The URL can be used to link to this page

HEX Agenda 12/12/2024COLLIER COUNTY Hearing Examiner AGENDA Growth Management Department Conference Rooms 609/610 2800 Horseshoe Drive North Naples, FL 34104 December 12, 2024 1:00 PM Andrew W. J. Dickman, Esq., AICP Hearing Examiner Note: Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes unless otherwise waived by the Hearing Examiner. Persons Wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the hearing report packets must have that material submitted to County staff at Ailyn.Padron@CollierCountyFL.gov 10 days prior to the Hearing. All materials used during presentation at the hearing will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Hearing Examiner will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto, and therefore may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Decisions of the Hearing Examiner are final unless appealed to the Board of County Commissioners. Hearing Procedures will provide for presentation by the Applicant, presentation by staff, public comment and applicant rebuttal. The Hearing Examiner will render a decision within 30 days. Persons wishing to receive a copy of the decision by mail may supply County staff with their name, address, and a stamped, self-addressed envelope for that purpose. Persons wishing to receive an electronic copy of the decision may supply their email address. 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Review of Agenda 3. Advertised Public Hearing 3.A. PETITION NO. CU-PL20240006001 - 3144 Santa Barbara Boulevard - Request for approval of a Conditional Use for the Fun Time Early Childhood Academy to allow for on-site food preparation for the school children and staff only, through the expansion of the existing kitchen area, superseding Resolution No. 88-76 and pursuant to subsection 2.03.02(C)(1)(c)(1) of the Collier County Land Development Code, on 1.11± acres located at 3144 Santa Barbara Boulevard in Section 28, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Timothy Finn, Planner III] Commission District 3 (2024-1991) 3.B. PETITION NO. PDI-PL20240002891 – Immokalee Road, approximately 1000 feet west of Page 1 of 590 Juliet Boulevard - Aspire Living, LLC requests an insubstantial change to the Blue Coral Apartments RPUD, Ordinance 21-31 for (1), the addition to Exhibit A, Tract B, Accessory Uses to allow a fenced dog park and sunshade structures; and (2) the addition of a footnote to Table 1 – Development Standards, Accessory Uses adding a north minimum yard requirement for a dog park and sunshade structures. The subject 9.35 +/- acre parcel is located on the south side of Immokalee Road, approximately 1000 feet west of Juliet Boulevard, in Section 30, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida [Coordinator: Timothy Finn, Planner III] Commissioner District 2 (2024-1992) 3.C. PETITION NO. VA-PL20240001659 –824 and 828 98th Ave North - Request for a variance from Land Development Code Section 5.03.02.C.2.b to increase the required RMF-6 zoned fence height from 6 feet to 8 feet on the west and east side property lines and the south rear property line on approximately 0.38 acres located at 824 and 828 98th Ave North, also known as Lots 37, 38 and part of Lot 39, Block 64 of the Naples Park Unit 5 subdivision in Section 28, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Sean Sammon, Planner III] Commissioner District 2 (2024-2035) 3.D. PETITION NO. SV-PL20220006266 – Northtide Naples – 3120 North Road - Request for an after-the-fact sign variance from Land Development Code Section 5.06.04.F.1.a. to increase the allowable sign height from 15 feet to 17 feet and from Section 5.06.04.F.1.b to decrease the required setback from 10 feet to 2.7 feet to allow a pole sign for Northtide Naples RV Resort. The subject property is located at the southwest corner of Airport Road and North Road, at 3120 North Road, in Section 2, Township 50 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (Coordinator: John Kelly, Planner III) (Commissioner District 4) (2024-2150) 3.E. PETITION NO. BD-PL20240006028 – 62 Dolphin Circle – Request for a 103-foot boat dock extension from the maximum permitted protrusion of 20 feet allowed by Section 5.03.06.E.1 of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) for waterways greater than 100 feet in width, to allow a boat docking facility protruding a total of 123 feet into a waterway that is 1,064± feet wide, pursuant to LDC Section 5.03.06.H. The subject property is located at 62 Dolphin Circle and is further described as Lot 92, Isles of Capri No. 1, in Section 31, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. (Coordinator: John Kelly, Planner III) (Commissioner District 1) (2024-2151) 3.F. PETITION NO. VA-PL20240007332 – 203 Goodland Dr E – Request for a variance from Land Development Code Section 5.03.06.E.6 to reduce the minimum side yard riparian setbacks from 7.5 feet to zero feet on both side yards for a proposed dock facility on an unplatted boat dock lot with 20± feet of water frontage within a Residential Single-Family-4 Zoning District and the Goodland Zoning Overlay (RSF-4- GZO). The subject property is deeded with and located north and immediately across Pettit Drive from 203 Goodland Drive East in Section 18, Township 52 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. (Companion to BD-PL20240003998) (Coordinator: John Kelly, Planner III) (Commissioner District 1) (2024- 2152) 3.G. PETITION NO. BD-PL20240003998 – 203 Goodland Dr. E – Request for a 13-foot boat dock extension, over the maximum 20 feet allowed by Section 5.03.06.E.1 of the Collier County Land Development Code for waterways 100 feet or greater in width, to construct a new dock facility that will protrude a total of 33 feet into a waterway that is 100± feet wide. The subject property is an unplatted boat dock lot deeded with and located north and immediately across Pettit Drive from 203 Goodland Drive East in Section 18, Township 52 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. (Companion to VA- PL20240007332) (Coordinator: John Kelly, Page 2 of 590 Planner III) (Commissioner District 1) (2024-2153) 4. New Business 5. Old Business 6. Public Comments 7. Adjourn Page 3 of 590 12/12/2024 Item # 3.A ID# 2024-1991 PETITION NO. CU-PL20240006001 - 3144 Santa Barbara Boulevard - Request for approval of a Conditional Use for the Fun Time Early Childhood Academy to allow for on-site food preparation for the school children and staff only, through the expansion of the existing kitchen area, superseding Resolution No. 88-76 and pursuant to subsection 2.03.02(C)(1)(c)(1) of the Collier County Land Development Code, on 1.11± acres located at 3144 Santa Barbara Boulevard in Section 28, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Timothy Finn, Planner III] Commission District 3 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Staff Report - Fun Time Early Childhood Academy CU 2. Attachment A - Concept Plan - Kitchen Expansion, revised 11-11-24, prepared by Fun Time Early Childhood Academy - To be adopted with HEX decision 3. Attachment B - Conditions of Approval - Modified Stipluations of Resolution No 88-76 - Ex B - To be adopted with HEX decision 4. Attachment C - Strikethrough-Underline Conditions of Resolution No 88-76 - Ex B 5. Attachment D - Resolution 88-76 6. Attachment E - Application-Backup Materials 7. Attachment F - Hearing Advertising Sign 8. Attachment G - NIM Materials Page 4 of 590 [21-CPS-02166/1760177/1] CU-PL20240006001, FUN TIME EARLY CHILDHOOD ACADEMY Revised Date: November 19, 2024 Page 1 of 10 STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FROM: ZONING DIVISION – ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: DECEMBER 12, 2024 SUBJECT: CU-PL20240006001; FUN TIME EARLY CHILDHOOD ACADEMY ______________________________________________________________________________ PROPERTY OWNER/AGENT: Owner/Applicant: Jessica Campbell Fun Time Early Childhood Academy Inc. 3144 Santa Barbara Boulevard Naples, FL 34116 REQUESTED ACTION: To have the Collier County Hearing Examiner (HEX) consider an application for approval of a Conditional Use (CU) for the Fun Time Early Childhood Academy to allow for on-site food preparation for the school children and staff only through the expansion of the existing kitchen area, superseding Resolution No. 88-76 and pursuant to subsection 2.03.02(C)(1)(c)(1) of the Collier County Land Development Code. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property comprises 1.11± acres and is located at 3144 Santa Barbara Boulevard in Section 28, Township 49 South Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. (See location map on page 3) PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The subject property is 1.11+/- acres in size and is located at 3144 Santa Barbara Boulevard. The property is located in the Urban Residential Subdistrict of the Urban Mixed-Use District of the Page 5 of 590 [21-CPS-02166/1760177/1] CU-PL20240006001, FUN TIME EARLY CHILDHOOD ACADEMY Revised Date: November 19, 2024 Page 2 of 10 Golden Gate City Sub-Element as described in the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP). The property is zoned Residential Multi-Family (RMF-12) district. 1988 Resolution 88-76 was memorialized providing a childcare facility. In 2024, Fun Time Early Childhood Academy is requesting a new conditional use to allow on-site food preparation for the school children and staff only through the expansion of the existing kitchen area. This is a conditional use for a “childcare facility” in the RMF-12 zoning district from Land Development Code (LDC) 2.03.02(C)(1)(c)(1). The revised concept plan in support of the application depicts the location of the existing building, parking areas, open spaces, and access locations. The site currently is served by County potable water and an on-site sanitary sewer septic subsystem with an onsite drain field. The revised concept plan shows the proposed kitchen expansion and proposed buffers, which will be provided to the greatest extent practical. The property is bounded on two sides by roadways: Santa Barbara Boulevard and 32nd Avenue SW. Per the original approved CU site plan, the only access to the site is Santa Barbara Boulevard. There will be no changes to this access or any other changes to the site parking areas with the modified CU. The existing childcare facility, as identified on the original site plan per Resolution 88-76, is separated from the east side nearest residential properties by a 20 ft access roadway. Additionally, the east side of the property is separated from the east side residential properties by a solid fence barrier at the center of the site, vacant land at the south end, and a 50-ft-wide stormwater retention area at the north end. A strikethrough/underline of the original conditional use’s conditions compared to what is proposed is attached for reference; see attachment C. Fun Time Early Childhood Academy is a not-for-profit childcare facility providing needed services to the local community. The proposed on-site food service is intended to serve the children and staff of the childcare facility exclusively. The food service will be fully internal, serving only those already present at the facility. Fun Time Early Childhood Academy needs to be able to prepare and serve balanced, healthy meals to children because nutrition plays a crucial role in their overall development, learning, and well-being. This ensures that children are well-fed and ready to focus on learning activities throughout the day. Proper nutrition is essential for physical growth, cognitive development, and maintaining energy levels, all of which are critical during the early years of education. Many children served by Fun Time come from low-income families, where access to nutritious meals may be limited. In the past, Fun Time Early Childhood Academy, previously known as Childs Path, was not able to prepare food on-site and had to outsource meals through a caterer. This was not only expensive but also limited the control over the nutritional content and meal quality. By preparing food in-house, Fun Time Early Childhood Academy can significantly reduce costs while ensuring that meals meet the highest nutritional standards, benefiting both the children and the Academy’s budget. Page 6 of 590 [21-CPS-02166/1760177/1] CU-PL20240006001, FUN TIME EARLY CHILDHOOD ACADEMY Revised Date: November 19, 2024 Page 3 of 10 Page 7 of 590 [21-CPS-02166/1760177/1] CU-PL20240006001, FUN TIME EARLY CHILDHOOD ACADEMY Revised Date: November 19, 2024 Page 4 of 10 Page 8 of 590 [21-CPS-02166/1760177/1] CU-PL20240006001, FUN TIME EARLY CHILDHOOD ACADEMY Revised Date: November 19, 2024 Page 5 of 10 SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: This section of the staff report identifies the land uses and zoning classifications for properties surrounding the boundaries of the subject property, which is developed with a childhood care facility and zoned Residential Multi-Family (RMF-12) zoning district: North: Developed with multi-family residential, with a current zoning designation of Residential Multi-Family (RMF-12) zoning district East: Developed with single and multi-family residential, with a current zoning designation of Residential Multi-Family (RMF-6) zoning district South: 32nd Avenue SW (two-lane local road), then developed with single-family residential, with a current zoning designation of Residential Single Family (RSF-3) zoning district West: Santa Barbara Boulevard (six-lane arterial) then developed with single-family residential, with a current zoning designation of Estates (E) zoning district Aerial (Collier County Appraiser) Page 9 of 590 [21-CPS-02166/1760177/1] CU-PL20240006001, FUN TIME EARLY CHILDHOOD ACADEMY Revised Date: November 19, 2024 Page 6 of 10 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: Comprehensive Planning staff has reviewed this request and offered the following comments: Future Land Use Element (FLUE): According to the Future Land Us Map (FLUE), the subject property is in the Urban residential sub-district of the Urban mixed-use district of the Golden Gate City sub-element as described in the Golden Gate City Master Plan. It is intended that Urban Designated areas accommodate most population growth and that the new intensive land uses be located within them. The Urban Designation will also accommodate future non- residential uses, including childcare facilities such as the existing facility onsite. Per the determination of the Comprehensive Planning staff, the proposed modification to the original conditional use permit is consistent with the FLUE and does not require any amendment to the GGAMP. Transportation Element: Transportation Planning staff reviewed the application and found this project consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). There is no proposed increase in the number of children and no additional traffic generation for this childcare facility. Additionally, the applicant is providing a condition that requires traffic control by law enforcement or an approved service provider if stacking or other traffic conflicts cause delays on Santa Barbara Boulevard. Finally, the development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals, including but not limited to any plats and or site development plans or amendments, are sought. Therefore, the subject amendment can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP. Transportation Review: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petition for compliance with the GMP and the LDC and recommends approval of this development. Stormwater Review: The proposed conditional use expansion request is not anticipated to create drainage problems or adverse stormwater management impacts to surrounding properties. Stormwater best management practices, treatment, and storage will be addressed through the environmental resource permitting (ERP) process with the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) and the Site Development Plan process to ensure consistency with the Collier County LDC. Additionally, the same Best Management Practices, Erosion Control Measures, and Pollution Prevention Plan associated with the current permitted operation will continue to be used for the proposed expansion. Landscape Review: The buffers labeled on the Master Concept Plan are consistent with the LDC. Utility Review: The project lies within the regional potable water service area and the Golden Gate wastewater service area of the Collier County Water-Sewer District (CCWSD). A water main is available north of 32nd Ave SW. There is adequate water treatment capacity to serve the project. Water services are available via existing infrastructure within the adjacent right-of-way. The project will be served by a private septic system, as connections to CCWSD services are not readily available. Any improvements to the CCWSD’s water or wastewater systems necessary to Page 10 of 590 [21-CPS-02166/1760177/1] CU-PL20240006001, FUN TIME EARLY CHILDHOOD ACADEMY Revised Date: November 19, 2024 Page 7 of 10 provide sufficient capacity to serve the project will be the responsibility of the owner/developer and will be conveyed to the CCWSD at no cost to the County at the time of utility acceptance. The development will have to meet all applicable criteria set forth in the LDC regarding Adequate Public Facilities. The project must also be consistent with all applicable goals and objectives of the GMP regarding adequate public facilities. This petition has been reviewed by county staff responsible for jurisdictional elements of the GMP as part of the rezoning process, and staff has concluded that the developer has provided appropriate commitments so that the impacts to the Level of Service (LOS) will be minimized. Environmental Review: Environmental Planning staff has reviewed this petition. The property has been developed and cleared of native vegetation. Therefore, the Master Plan does not show a preserve since no minimum preservation is required. No listed animal species were observed on the property. This project does not require an Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. Environmental Services staff recommend approval of the proposed petition. Conservation & Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental staff evaluated the petition. The property is 1.12 acres; the project is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the CCME. STAFF ANALYSIS: When considering a Conditional Use petition, the HEX must make findings that: 1) approval of the Conditional Use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other properties of uses in the same district of the neighborhood; 2) all specific requirements for the individual Conditional Use will be met; and 3) satisfactory provisions have been made concerning the following matters, where applicable 1. Section 2.03.02(C)(1)(c)(1) of the LDC permits conditional uses in the Residential Multi- Family (RMF-12) zoning district The requested use for a childcare center is allowed as a conditional use in the Residential Multi-Family (RMF-12) zoning district, subject to the standards and procedures established in section 10.08.00, conditional uses procedures, of the LDC. 2. Consistency with the Land Development Code (LDC) and the Growth Management Plan (GMP). This request is consistent with the GMP and with the conditions proposed by staff; this project will be in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Land Development Code (LDC). Page 11 of 590 [21-CPS-02166/1760177/1] CU-PL20240006001, FUN TIME EARLY CHILDHOOD ACADEMY Revised Date: November 19, 2024 Page 8 of 10 3. Ingress and egress to the property and proposed structures thereon, with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe. Per the original CU, turn lanes have been provided on Santa Barbara Boulevard. With this modification to the original CU, there will be no changes to the internal parking area or driveways, which have already been configured to allow emergency vehicle access. The current traffic generated by the childcare facility primarily consists of parents/guardians dropping off and picking up children, as well as staff commuting to and from work. Providing food on-site is expected to enhance operational efficiency by reducing the need for parents/guardians to make additional stops for meals before and after drop-off and pick-up, potentially further stabilizing traffic flow. 4. The effect the Conditional Use would have on neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects. The existing childcare facility has negligible impact on neighboring properties. The CU modification will allow for a proposed kitchen expansion for on-site food preparation for the children and staff of the childcare facility. The expansion will be located at the front of the existing building facing Santa Barbara Boulevard. There is one neighboring home located north of the property. The childcare facility will provide any additional appropriate buffering to the greatest extent practical based on on-site conditions as required by the LDC. The childcare facility kitchen expansion will produce no additional odors or noise that would be inappropriate for this location. 5. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other properties in the district. If the proposed Conditions of Approval are adopted, the proposed childcare facility kitchen expansion can be found to be compatible with adjacent properties and other properties in the immediate area. Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with stipulations as outlined in this staff report, be recommended for approval. It is important to note that the conditions of approval from the existing Conditional Use adopted via Resolution 88-76 (Attachment D) will be modified per the following as described in the Proposed Conditions of Approval (Attachment B). NOVEMBER 25, 2024, NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): The NIM was scheduled for Monday, November 25, 2024, at 5:30 p.m. at the Fun Time Early Childhood Academy located at 3144 Santa Barbara Boulevard, Naples. FL. No members of the public were present or participated remotely; however, the applicant provided a PowerPoint presentation as a courtesy. No commitments were made. A copy of the NIM advertising and PowerPoint presentation is included in Attachment G. Page 12 of 590 [21-CPS-02166/1760177/1] CU-PL20240006001, FUN TIME EARLY CHILDHOOD ACADEMY Revised Date: November 19, 2024 Page 9 of 10 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Collier County Hearing Examiner (HEX) approve Petition CU- PL20240006001, subject to the following conditions: a) The new construction shall be limited to what is depicted on the “Concept Plan – Kitchen Expansion, revised 11/11/2024,” prepared by Fun Time Early Childhood Academy, Inc. b) Should stacking or other traffic conflicts cause delays on Santa Barbara Boulevard, the property owner shall provide traffic control by law enforcement or a law enforcement- approved service provider, with appropriate staffing and at sufficient location(s), as determined by the County Manager or their designee. c) Food may be prepared on-site for staff and students only. d) The three (3) lots involved in this petition shall each have 6-foot easements along their side and rear lot lines. Any buildings within the easements shall be prohibited unless or until the easements are vacated. e) The proposed childcare use shall be limited to a maximum number of one hundred children. f) Any new construction associated with the revised conditional use permit, including the proposed kitchen expansion, shall conform to the new 2024 Collier County FEMA Firm map. g) An updated Landscape Plan shall be submitted with plans and details of the existing landscape for any future additions or enlargements to the existing structure (SDP). The proposed landscape Buffer areas are shown on the Concept Plan and will be provided to the greatest extent practical based on existing site conditions. h) Landscaping/Buffers: The revised Concept Plan shows the addition of buffers along the property lines (e.g., 15-foot Type B along the eastern and northern sides, 15-foot Type D buffer along the western side, and 10-foot Type D buffer along the southern side). Due to the existing site conditions—including but not limited to stormwater retention areas, utility and drainage easements, and asphalt parking areas—the proposed buffers will be provided only to the greatest extent practical. Buffers will include existing healthy mature canopy trees. Landscape buffering shall not impact stormwater retention areas or septic system drain field operation or reduce the size of any existing asphalt parking or driveway. Attachments: A) Concept Plan – Kitchen Expansion, revised 11/11/2024, prepared by Fun Time Early Childhood Academy - To be adopted with HEX decision B) Conditions of Approval – Modified Stipulations of Resolution No. 88-76 – Ex B - To be adopted with HEX decision Page 13 of 590 [21-CPS-02166/1760177/1] CU-PL20240006001, FUN TIME EARLY CHILDHOOD ACADEMY Revised Date: November 19, 2024 Page 10 of 10 C) Strikethrough-Underline Conditions of Resolution No. 88-76 – Ex B - Illustrative purposes only D) Resolution 88-76 - Illustrative purposes only E) Application/Backup Materials F) Hearing Advertising Sign G) NIM Materials Page 14 of 590 13.012.411.911.510.89.89.99.59.39.79.89.710.410.69.810.210.610.810.810.611.011.211.111.011.211.010.811.011.09.710.011.111.312.812.512.913.012.813.013.213.013.513.713.513.413.212.913.413.613.613.513.110.510.010.810.910.910.811.411.211.211.011.211.611.911.211.711.011.311.311.010.99.89.810.310.210.69.39.99.69.19.111.19.610.911.011.211.711.112.012.312.311.711.111.611.512.211.211.810.610.711.010.711.710.010.210.99.811.79.39.511.610.511.211.010.910.910.811.312.312.612.712.412.212.411.911.911.611.111.211.311.311.411.511.611.111.111.110.910.811.412.111.611.711.511.811.612.011.010.09.79.79.79.89.610.19.69.79.810.09.89.910.510.110.910.110.69.89.99.69.89.510.09.69.59.99.89.69.511.711.310.310.18.88.010.511.18.98.810.811.211.311.48.99.19.011.511.48.98.48.59.111.511.411.511.411.411.811.812.012.412.111.911.812.212.112.212.411.712.8412.7812.79OHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUS0331’01"E 126.98’(D)S0333’43"E 126.97’(S)32.9’18.4’4.9’59.7’5.0’18.4’32.8’18.3’13.4’21.8’9.0’16.3’9.0’21.3’13.4’18.3’16.3’3.2’3.2’SANTA BARBARA BOULEVARDRIGHT OF WAY VARIES32ND AVENUE S.W.60’ RIGHT OF WAY3144 SANTA BARBARABOULEVARDEXISTING ONESTORY COMMERCIALSTRUCTUREASPHALTPARKINGASPHALTPARKINGPLAYGROUNDPLAYGROUND12.4’X16.4’WOODPAVILIONTIKIHUT7.6’X9.6’ SHED IS1.30’ WEST OFPROPERTY LINE7.6’X9.6’SHEDS0201’59"E 59.99’(S)N8824’56"E 125.07’(P)N8753’06"E 99.26’(S)N0022’38"E 415.00’(P)N0009’12"W 415.00’(S)N8824’56"E 125.07’(P)N8753’06"E 125.07’(S)N0022’38"E 253.35’(P)N0009’47"W 253.36’(S)L1N0007’35"W 134.04’(D)N0008’23"W 134.04’(S)C1C25.00’120.07’L2N8753’06"E 120.93’(S)LOT 28BLOCK 269(OCCUPIED)LOT 27BLOCK 269(OCCUPIED)LOT 26BLOCK 269(OCCUPIED)LOT 25BLOCK 269(OCCUPIED)LOT 24BLOCK 269(OCCUPIED)LOT 23BLOCK 269(OCCUPIED)LOT 4BLOCK 269(OCCUPIED)LOT 3BLOCK 269LOT 2BLOCK 269LOT 1BLOCK 269A/CPADA/CPADPLATTED 20’ WIDEWALLYCORNER OF VINYL FENCEIS 0.3’ EAST OFPROPERTY LINECORNER OF VINYL FENCEIS 0.1’ WEST OFPROPERTY LINE34.3’34.2’36.3’36.3’PLATTED 6’ WIDE DRAINAGEAND UTILITY EASEMENTPLATTED 6’ WIDE DRAINAGEAND UTILITY EASEMENTPLATTED 6’ WIDE DRAINAGEAND UTILITY EASEMENTPLATTED 6’ WIDE DRAINAGEAND UTILITY EASEMENTPLATTED 6’ WIDE DRAINAGEAND UTILITY EASEMENT (TYP.) CLIENT:TITLE:FILE NO.:SHEET OFNO.REVISION DESCRIPTIONDATE BY28421 BONITA CROSSINGS BOULEVARDCOASTAL AND MARINE ENGINEERINGENVIRONMENTAL AND GEOLOGICAL SERVICESLAND AND MARINE SURVEY AND MAPPINGBONITA SPRINGS, FLORIDA 34135 PHONE: (239)643-2324 FAX: (239)643-1143www.coastalengineering.comE-Mail: info@cecifl.comServing Florida Since 1977THIS DOCUMENT, AND THE CONCEPTS AND DESIGNS PRESENTED HEREIN, AS AN INSTRUMENT OFSERVICE, IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE AND CLIENT FOR WHICH IT WAS PREPARED.REUSE OF AND IMPROPER RELIANCE ON THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION ANDADAPTATION BY COASTAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. (CECI) OR ITS SUBSIDIARIES SHALL BEWITHOUT LIABILITY TO CECI OR ITS SUBSIDIARIES.CHECKED:F.B.ACAD NO.PG.DRAWN:DATE:REF. NO.SCALE:SEC. TWP. RNG.24.03511FUN TIME EARLY CHILDHOOD ACADEMY, INC.1" = 30’G69367-6926E49S24.03524.03503/08/24MMWRJE28LEGAL DESCRIPTIONLOT 1, 2 AND 3, BLOCK 269, GOLDEN GATE UNIT 7, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLATTHEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 135, LESS AND EXCEPT ROAD RIGHT OFWAY AS SET FORTH IN ORDER OF TAKING RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 4088, PAGE 85,PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.THE ABOVE DESCRIBES AN AREA OF APPROXIMATELY 48,957 SQUARE FEET OR 1.12ACRES OF LAND.GENERAL NOTES1. = FOUND 4"X4" CONCRETE MONUMENT.2. = FOUND 5/8" IRON PIN AS NOTED.3. = FOUND PK NAIL AND DISC.4. = SET 5/8" IRON PIN AND CAP STAMPED CEC LB 2464.5. BEARINGS BASED ON A GRID BEARING OF N8753’06"E ON THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF 32ND AVENUE S.W.6. DESCRIBED PROPERTY LIES IN FLOOD ZONE X, PER F.I.R.M. COMMUNITY PANEL NO. 120067 MAP NO. 12021C 0412J DATED FEBRUARY 08, 2024.7. ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE RELATIVE TO NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM 1988 (N.A.V.D. 88).8. ELEVATIONS AND DISTANCES SHOWN HEREON ARE IN FEET AND DECIMALS THEREOF.9. THIS SURVEY IS CERTIFIED TO THE DATE OF THE FIELD SURVEY, NOT THE DATE OF SIGNATURE.LEGEND(P) = PLAT DATA(S) = SURVEY DATA(D) = DESCRIPTION DATA(C) = CALCULATED DATA(TYP.) = TYPICALOHU = OVERHEAD UTILITY LINESCALE: 1" = 30’306030150ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY OF LOT 1, 2 AND 3,BLOCK 269, GOLDEN GATE UNIT 7, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF ASRECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 135, LESS AND EXCEPT ROAD RIGHT OF WAY ASSET FORTH IN ORDER OF TAKING RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 4088, PAGE 85, PUBLICRECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.CXX - CURVE TABLECURVEC1(D)C2(D)RADIUS25.00’25.00’DELTA0428’28"LENGTH1.95’39.90’CHORD1.95’35.80’BEARINGN8950’45"WN4152’52"WC1(S)C2(S)25.00’25.00’1.95’39.90’1.95’35.80’N8951’33"WN4153’40"W9127’17"LXX - LINE TABLELINEL1(D)L2(D)BEARINGN8952’25"ES1902’33"EDISTANCE4.61’35.94’L1(S)L2(S)N8951’37"ES1903’21"E4.61’35.94’FLORIDA BUSINESS AUTHORIZATION NO. LB 2464COASTAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC.DATE OF FIELD SURVEY: 03/07/2024FLORIDA CERTIFICATE NO. 5295PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPERTHE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDANOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE ANDLICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPERDATE OF SIGNATURE: RICHARD J. EWING, PSMFOR THE BENEFIT OFFUN TIME EARLY CHILDHOOD ACADEMY, INC.FIRST FOUNDATION BANKSTEWARD TITLEQUARLES & BRADYDigitally signed by Richard J Ewing DN: c=US, o=Florida, dnQualifier=A01410C0000018C5EA79233000F018D, cn=Richard J Ewing Date: 2024.03.14 07:45:38 -04'00'Proposed Food Preparation Kitchen Expansion - Approx. 19' x 14'Current Kitchen food storage area.Stormwaterrunoff retentionareasSolid 6 ft. high fence *Buffers to be provided to the greatest extent practical. Existing utility access area for septic system and fence back gate. - approx. 20 ft. wide.Existing SchoolMarqueeExisting access roadway - 20 ft. wide..Fun Time Early Childhood Academy, Inc. - Santa Barbara LocationConcept Plan - Kitchen Expansion - Rev. 2 - 11/11/2024CU-PL20240006001*15' Type B Buffer*15' Type D Buffer*15' Type D Buffer*15' Type D Buffer*15' Type B Buffer*10' Type D BufferSeptic System DrainfieldPage 1 of 1, Rev. 2NoPreservationRequired.Page 15 of 590 Fun Time Early Childhood Academy | CU-PL20240006001 11/11/2024 Page 1 of 1 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL [Modified Stipulations Provided for by Resolution No. 88-76, Exhibit “B”] a. The new construction shall be limited to what is depicted on the “Concept Plan – Kitchen Expansion, revised 11/11/2024,” prepared by Fun Time Early Childhood Academy, Inc. b. Should stacking or other traffic conflicts cause delays on Santa Barbara, the property owner shall provide traffic control by law enforcement or a law enforcement-approved service provider, with appropriate staffing and at sufficient location(s), as determined by the County Manager or their designee. c. Food may be prepared on site for staff and students only. d. The three (3) lots involved in this petition shall each have 6-foot easements along their side and rear lot lines. Any buildings within the easements shall be prohibited unless or until the easements are vacated. e. The proposed child care use shall be limited to a maximum number of one hundred children. f. Any new construction associated with the revised conditional use permit, including the proposed kitchen expansion, shall conform to the new 2024 Collier County FEMA Firm map. g. An updated Landscape Plan shall be submitted with plans and details of existing landscape for any future additions or enlargements to the existing structure (SDP). The proposed landscape Buffer areas are shown on the Concept Plan and will be provided to the greatest extent practical based on existing site conditions. h. Landscaping/Buffers: The revised Concept Plan shows the addition of buffers along the property lines (e.g., 15-foot Type B along the eastern and northern sides; 15-foot Type D buffer along the western side; and 10-foot Type D buffer along the southern side). Due to the existing site conditions—including but not limited to, storm water retention areas, utility and drainage easements, and asphalt parking areas—the proposed buffers will be provided only to the greatest extent practical. Buffers will include existing healthy mature canopy trees. Landscape buffering shall not impact storm water retention areas, septic system drain field operation, or reduce the size of any existing asphalt parking or driveway. Page 16 of 590 Fun Time Early Childhood Academy | CU-PL20240006001 10/11/2024 Page 1 of 3 Stipulations Provided for by Resolution No. 88-76, Exhibit “B”: a. Petitioner shall be subject to Ordinance 75-21 [or the tree/vegetation removal ordinance in existence at the time of permitting], requiring the acquisition of a tree removal permit prior to any land clearing. A site clearing plan shall be submitted to the National Resources Management Department and the Community Development Division for their review and approval prior to any substantial work on the site. This plan may be submitted in phases to coincide with the development schedule. The site clearing plan shall clearly depict how the final site layout incorporates retained native vegetation to the maximum extent possible and how roads, buildings, lakes, parking lots, and other facilities have been oriented to accommodate this goal. b. Native species shall be utilized, where available, to the maximum extent possible in the site landscaping design. A landscaping plan will be submitted to the Natural Resources Management Department and the Community Development Division for their review and approval. This plan will depict the incorporation of native species and their mix with other species, if any. The goal of the site landscaping shall be the re-creation of native vegetation and habitat characteristics lost on the site during construction or due to past activities. c. All exotic plants, as defined in the County Code, call be removed during each phase of construction from development areas, open space areas, and preserve areas. Following site development a maintenance program shall be implemented to prevent reinvasion of the site by such exotic species. This plan, which will describe control techniques and inspection intervals, shall be filed with and approved by the Natural Resources Management Department and the Community Development Division. d. If during the course of site clearing, excavation, or other constructional activities, an archaeological or historical site, artifact, or other indicator is discovered, all development at that location shall be immediately stopped and the National Resources Management Department notified. Development will be suspended for a sufficient length of time to enable the Natural Resources Management Department or a designated consultant to assess the find and determine the proper course of action in regard to its salvageability. The Natural Resources Management Department will respond to any such notification in a timely and efficient manner so as to provide only a minimal interruption to any constructional activities. e. Detailed site drainage plans shall be submitted to the County Engineer for review. No construction permits shall be issued unless and until approval of the proposed construction in accordance with the submitted plans is granted by the County Engineer. The water management design shall provide for water quality treatment of stormwater by retaining a minimum of one inch of runoff from the project. Page 17 of 590 Fun Time Early Childhood Academy | CU-PL20240006001 10/11/2024 Page 2 of 3 f. The developer shall provide left and right turn lanes on Santa Barbara Boulevard in accordance with the requirements of Ordinance 82-91. The southbound left turn lane shall be a concurrent improvement and the northbound right turn lane shall be required at such time as traffic volumes warrant in accordance with the requirements set forth in the Ordinances unless waived by the County Engineer. g.b.Should it become apparent that employees or clients of the project are causing problems by driving across the median to gain access to or from the site, the petitioner shall be required to provide median curbing on one or both sides of the median, depending upon the nature of the problem, from the existing median opening to a point 100 feet north of the northern access.Should stacking or other traffic conflicts cause delays on Santa Barbara, the property owner shall provide traffic control by law enforcement or a law enforcement-approved service provider, with appropriate staffing and at sufficient location(s), as determined by the County Manager or their designee. h. These improvements are considered “site related” as defined in Ordinance 85-55 and shall not be applied as credits toward any impact fees required by that ordinance. i. No showers shall be routinely provided on site. j.c.No meals shall Food may be prepared on site for staff and students only, but shall be served. k. Access to the site shall be in accordance with Ordinance 82-91. l.d.The three (3) lots involved in this petition shall each have 6- foot easements along their side and rear lot lines. Any buildings within the easements shall be prohibited unless or until the easements are vacated. m.e.The proposed child care use shall be limited to a maximum number of one hundred children. n.f.The Children’s outdoor activity area shall be buffered with a solid, opaque, fence structure in accordance with Section 8.37 of the Zoning Ordinance 82-2. g. Any new construction associated with the revised conditional use permit, including the proposed kitchen expansion, shall conform to the new 2024 Collier County FEMA Firm map. h. An updated Landscape Plan shall be submitted with plans and details of existing landscape for any future additions or enlargements to the existing structure (SDP). The proposed landscape Buffer areas are shown on the Concept Plan and will be provided to the greatest extent practical based on existing site conditions. Page 18 of 590 Fun Time Early Childhood Academy | CU-PL20240006001 10/11/2024 Page 3 of 3 i. Landscaping/Buffers: The revised Concept Plan shows the addition of buffers along the property lines (e.g., 15-foot Type B along the eastern and northern sides; 15-foot Type D buffer along the western side; and 10-foot Type D buffer along the southern side). Due to the existing site conditions—including but not limited to, storm water retention areas, utility and drainage easements, and asphalt parking areas—the proposed buffers will be provided only to the greatest extent practical. Buffers will include existing healthy mature canopy trees. Landscape buffering shall not impact storm water retention areas, septic system drain field operation, or reduce the size of any existing asphalt parking or driveway. Page 19 of 590 Page 20 of 590 Page 21 of 590 Page 22 of 590 Page 23 of 590 Page 24 of 590 Page 25 of 590 Page 26 of 590 Page 27 of 590 Page 28 of 590 Page 29 of 590 Page 30 of 590 Page 31 of 590 Page 32 of 590 Page 33 of 590 Page 34 of 590 Page 35 of 590 Page 36 of 590 Page 37 of 590 Page 38 of 590 Page 39 of 590 Page 40 of 590 Page 41 of 590 Appendix 3 FUN TIME EARLY CHILDHOOD ACADEMY 3144 SANTA BARBARA BLVD. Conditional Use Application – PL#: 20240006001 Property ID #: 36458960009 WARRANTY DEED Page 42 of 590 Page 43 of 590 Page 44 of 590 Page 45 of 590 Page 46 of 590 Page 47 of 590 Page 48 of 590 Page 49 of 590 Page 50 of 590 Page 51 of 590 Page 52 of 590 Page 53 of 590 Page 54 of 590 Appendix 7 FUN TIME EARLY CHILDHOOD ACADEMY 3144 SANTA BARBARA BLVD. Conditional Use Application – PL#: 20240006001 Property ID #: 36458960009 CURRENT AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH OF EXISTING SITE AND BUILDING Page 55 of 590 Fun Time Early Childhood Academy3144 Santa Barbara Blvd.Page 56 of 590 Page 57 of 590 Page 58 of 590 Page 59 of 590 Page 60 of 590 Page 61 of 590 Page 62 of 590 Page 63 of 590 Page 64 of 590 Page 65 of 590 Appendix 8 FUN TIME EARLY CHILDHOOD ACADEMY 3144 SANTA BARBARA BLVD. Conditional Use Application – PL#: 20240006001 Property ID #: 36458960009 STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS INFORMATION AND SKETCHES OF EXISTING SEPTIC SYSTEM PERMIT 88-1712 Page 66 of 590 FUN TIME EARLY CHILDHOOD ACADEMY 3144 SANTA BARBARA BLVD. Conditional Use Application – PL#: 20240006001 Property ID #: 36458960009 STATEMENT: THE BUILDING IS CURRENTLY SERVICED BY THE COUNTY WATER UTILITY AND A SEPARATE ON-SITE SEPTIC SYSTEM FOR SANITARY WASTE NO CHANGES WILL BE MADE TO THESE SYSTEMS WITH THIS CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION REQUEST. Page 67 of 590 Page 68 of 590 Page 69 of 590 Page 70 of 590 Page 71 of 590 Page 72 of 590 Page 73 of 590 Page 74 of 590 Page 75 of 590 Page 76 of 590 Page 77 of 590 Page 78 of 590 Page 79 of 590 Page 80 of 590 Page 81 of 590 Appendix 4 FUN TIME EARLY CHILDHOOD ACADEMY 3144 SANTA BARBARA BLVD. Conditional Use Application – PL#: 20240006001 Property ID #: 36458960009 BOUNDARY SURVEY Page 82 of 590 13.012.411.911.510.89.89.99.59.39.79.89.710.410.69.810.210.610.810.810.611.011.211.111.011.211.010.811.011.09.710.011.111.312.812.512.913.012.813.013.213.013.513.713.513.413.212.913.413.613.613.513.110.510.010.810.910.910.811.411.211.211.011.211.611.911.211.711.011.311.311.010.99.89.810.310.210.69.39.99.69.19.111.19.610.911.011.211.711.112.012.312.311.711.111.611.512.211.211.810.610.711.010.711.710.010.210.99.811.79.39.511.610.511.211.010.910.910.811.312.312.612.712.412.212.411.911.911.611.111.211.311.311.411.511.611.111.111.110.910.811.412.111.611.711.511.811.612.011.010.09.79.79.79.89.610.19.69.79.810.09.89.910.510.110.910.110.69.89.99.69.89.510.09.69.59.99.89.69.511.711.310.310.18.88.010.511.18.98.810.811.211.311.48.99.19.011.511.48.98.48.59.111.511.411.511.411.411.811.812.012.412.111.911.812.212.112.212.411.712.8412.7812.79OHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUS03°31'01"E 126.98'(D)S03°33'43"E 126.97'(S)32.9'18.4'4.9'59.7'5.0'18.4'32.8'18.3'13.4'21.8'9.0'16.3'9.0'21.3'13.4'18.3'16.3'3.2'3.2'SANTA BARBARA BOULEVARDRIGHT OF WAY VARIES32ND AVENUE S.W.60' RIGHT OF WAY3144 SANTA BARBARABOULEVARDEXISTING ONESTORY COMMERCIALSTRUCTUREASPHALTPARKINGASPHALTPARKINGPLAYGROUNDPLAYGROUND12.4'X16.4'WOODPAVILIONTIKIHUT7.6'X9.6' SHED IS1.30' WEST OFPROPERTY LINE7.6'X9.6'SHEDS02°01'59"E 59.99'(S)N88°24'56"E 125.07'(P)N87°53'06"E 99.26'(S)N00°22'38"E 415.00'(P)N00°09'12"W 415.00'(S)N88°24'56"E 125.07'(P)N87°53'06"E 125.07'(S)N00°22'38"E 253.35'(P)N00°09'47"W 253.36'(S)L1N00°07'35"W 134.04'(D)N00°08'23"W 134.04'(S)C1C25.00'120.07'L2N87°53'06"E 120.93'(S)LOT 28BLOCK 269(OCCUPIED)LOT 27BLOCK 269(OCCUPIED)LOT 26BLOCK 269(OCCUPIED)LOT 25BLOCK 269(OCCUPIED)LOT 24BLOCK 269(OCCUPIED)LOT 23BLOCK 269(OCCUPIED)LOT 4BLOCK 269(OCCUPIED)LOT 3BLOCK 269LOT 2BLOCK 269LOT 1BLOCK 269A/CPADA/CPADPLATTED 20' WIDEWALLYCORNER OF VINYL FENCEIS 0.3' EAST OFPROPERTY LINECORNER OF VINYL FENCEIS 0.1' WEST OFPROPERTY LINE34.3'34.2'36.3'36.3'PLATTED 6' WIDE DRAINAGEAND UTILITY EASEMENTPLATTED 6' WIDE DRAINAGEAND UTILITY EASEMENTPLATTED 6' WIDE DRAINAGEAND UTILITY EASEMENTPLATTED 6' WIDE DRAINAGEAND UTILITY EASEMENTPLATTED 6' WIDE DRAINAGEAND UTILITY EASEMENT (TYP.) CLIENT:TITLE:FILE NO.:SHEET OFNO.REVISION DESCRIPTIONDATE BY28421 BONITA CROSSINGS BOULEVARDCOASTAL AND MARINE ENGINEERINGENVIRONMENTAL AND GEOLOGICAL SERVICESLAND AND MARINE SURVEY AND MAPPINGBONITA SPRINGS, FLORIDA 34135 PHONE: (239)643-2324 FAX: (239)643-1143www.coastalengineering.comE-Mail: info@cecifl.comServing Florida Since 1977THIS DOCUMENT, AND THE CONCEPTS AND DESIGNS PRESENTED HEREIN, AS AN INSTRUMENT OFSERVICE, IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE AND CLIENT FOR WHICH IT WAS PREPARED.REUSE OF AND IMPROPER RELIANCE ON THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION ANDADAPTATION BY COASTAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. (CECI) OR ITS SUBSIDIARIES SHALL BEWITHOUT LIABILITY TO CECI OR ITS SUBSIDIARIES.CHECKED:F.B.ACAD NO.PG.DRAWN:DATE:REF. NO.SCALE:SEC. TWP. RNG.24.03511FUN TIME EARLY CHILDHOOD ACADEMY, INC.1" = 30'G69367-6926E49S24.03524.03503/08/24MMWRJE28LEGAL DESCRIPTIONLOT 1, 2 AND 3, BLOCK 269, GOLDEN GATE UNIT 7, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLATTHEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 135, LESS AND EXCEPT ROAD RIGHT OFWAY AS SET FORTH IN ORDER OF TAKING RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 4088, PAGE 85,PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.THE ABOVE DESCRIBES AN AREA OF APPROXIMATELY 48,957 SQUARE FEET OR 1.12ACRES OF LAND.GENERAL NOTES1. = FOUND 4"X4" CONCRETE MONUMENT.2. = FOUND 5/8" IRON PIN AS NOTED.3. = FOUND PK NAIL AND DISC.4. = SET 5/8" IRON PIN AND CAP STAMPED CEC LB 2464.5. BEARINGS BASED ON A GRID BEARING OF N87°53'06"E ON THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF 32ND AVENUE S.W.6. DESCRIBED PROPERTY LIES IN FLOOD ZONE X, PER F.I.R.M. COMMUNITY PANEL NO. 120067 MAP NO. 12021C 0412J DATED FEBRUARY 08, 2024.7. ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE RELATIVE TO NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM 1988 (N.A.V.D. 88).8. ELEVATIONS AND DISTANCES SHOWN HEREON ARE IN FEET AND DECIMALS THEREOF.9. THIS SURVEY IS CERTIFIED TO THE DATE OF THE FIELD SURVEY, NOT THE DATE OF SIGNATURE.LEGEND(P) = PLAT DATA(S) = SURVEY DATA(D) = DESCRIPTION DATA(C) = CALCULATED DATA(TYP.) = TYPICALOHU = OVERHEAD UTILITY LINESCALE: 1" = 30'306030150ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY OF LOT 1, 2 AND 3,BLOCK 269, GOLDEN GATE UNIT 7, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF ASRECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 135, LESS AND EXCEPT ROAD RIGHT OF WAY ASSET FORTH IN ORDER OF TAKING RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 4088, PAGE 85, PUBLICRECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.CXX - CURVE TABLECURVEC1(D)C2(D)RADIUS25.00'25.00'DELTA04°28'28"LENGTH1.95'39.90'CHORD1.95'35.80'BEARINGN89°50'45"WN41°52'52"WC1(S)C2(S)25.00'25.00'1.95'39.90'1.95'35.80'N89°51'33"WN41°53'40"W91°27'17"LXX - LINE TABLELINEL1(D)L2(D)BEARINGN89°52'25"ES19°02'33"EDISTANCE4.61'35.94'L1(S)L2(S)N89°51'37"ES19°03'21"E4.61'35.94'FLORIDA BUSINESS AUTHORIZATION NO. LB 2464COASTAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC.DATE OF FIELD SURVEY: 03/07/2024FLORIDA CERTIFICATE NO. 5295PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPERTHE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDANOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE ANDLICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPERDATE OF SIGNATURE: RICHARD J. EWING, PSMFOR THE BENEFIT OFFUN TIME EARLY CHILDHOOD ACADEMY, INC.FIRST FOUNDATION BANKSTEWARD TITLEQUARLES & BRADYDigitally signed by Richard J Ewing DN: c=US, o=Florida, dnQualifier=A01410C0000018C5EA79233000F018D, cn=Richard J Ewing Date: 2024.03.14 07:45:38 -04'00'Page 83 of 590 Page 84 of 590 Page 85 of 590 Page 86 of 590 Page 87 of 590 Page 88 of 590 Page 89 of 590 Page 90 of 590 Page 91 of 590 Page 92 of 590 Page 93 of 590 Page 94 of 590 Page 95 of 590 Appendix 1 FUN TIME EARLY CHILDHOOD ACADEMY 3144 SANTA BARBARA BLVD. Conditional Use Application – PL#: 20240006001 Property ID #: 36458960009 ORIGINAL RESOLUTION 88-76 SHOWING REQUESTED DELETION OF ITEM 4 (j) OF AGREEMENT Page 96 of 590 ORIGINAL RESOLUTION FOR CHILD'S PATH SCHOOL. SEE LAST PAGE FOR REQUESTED AGREEMENT DELETION. Page 97 of 590 Page 98 of 590 Page 99 of 590 Page 100 of 590 Conditional Use Application requesting deletion of Item j. to allow food preparation within building. Page 101 of 590 Appendix 6 FUN TIME EARLY CHILDHOOD ACADEMY 3144 SANTA BARBARA BLVD. Conditional Use Application – PL#: 20240006001 Property ID #: 36458960009 ORIGINAL PLAN SHOWING LANDSCAPING AND TREES PROTECTED BY COUNTY REGULATIONS Page 102 of 590 Master Concept Plan to include statement that "noPreservation RequiredPage 103 of 590 Page 104 of 590 Page 105 of 590 Page 106 of 590 Page 107 of 590 Page 108 of 590 FUN TIME EARLY CHILDHOOD ACADEMY, INC. Date: September 16, 2024 Mr. Timothy Finn, AICP Principal Planner Collier County Growth Management Division/ Planning and Regulation Land Development Services Department Comprehensive Planning Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 RE: CU-PL20240006001; Fun Time Early Childhood Academy Review 1 - Response to Review Comments Dear Mr. Finn: This correspondence is our formal response to the comment review letter provided to us on August 28, 2024. Responses to staff comments have been provided in bold. a. Rejected Review: Engineering Stormwater Review Reviewed By: Jocelyn Nageon de Lestang Correction Comment 1: Rev-1 Advisory comment only. Applicant is advised that Collier County FEMA FIRM map was updated in February 2024. New proposed Building Finished Floor Elevations (FFE) shall be held to latest FEMA Base Flood Elevation (BFE) plus 1 foot, or the 100yr 3-day design flood elevation - whichever is highest. Please Note! Any proposed additions or enlargements to an existing structure with FFE below the current Collier County minimum requirement (BFE +1') will be subject to the limitations imposed by FEMA's 50% rule. Response: Upon approval of this CU modification, we will move forward with plans and details for the future kitchen expansion of the existing structure. These future plans will take into account the FEMA Base Flood Elevation of February 2024 criteria before any building permit application (SDP) is submitted to the County. Please note that per the new FEMA maps the property is located in Zone X. b. Rejected Review: Landscape Review Reviewed By: Mark Templeton Correction Comment 1: It appears that there have been changes to the site based on what is shown on the site /landscape plan submitted. The plans show an island on either side of the entrance into the building. Based on streetview, these islands are not existing. And there appears to be other areas that are impervious that were shown as pervious on the previous approved plan. And the black olives have been replaced with live oaks. There is no need to show existing landscaping on the CU Concept Plan. Condition a. in the original CU is that a clearing plan showing how existing vegetation is to be retained to the greatest extent practical must be submitted at time of permitting (SDP). Since landscape plans are reviewed at time of SDP to verify compliance with all landscape requirements, please use an Page 109 of 590 Mr. Timothy Finn, AICP RE: CU-PL20240006001; Fun Time Early Childhood Academy , Review 1 Response September 16, 2024 Page 2 of 5 existing plan that does not show landscape as the CU Plan. It appears that this will need to be updated as there are pervious areas on the plan that appear to be impervious based on streetview. Staff recommends that the applicant conduct a site visit to document current existing conditions to ensure that what is shown on the plan accurately depicts the current site layout. On the updated concept plan please label the buffers as noted in the pre-app notes. Response: We understand that changes have occurred over time since the original landscape plan was submitted with the original permit. Upon approval of this CU modification, we will move forward with plans and details for the future kitchen expansion to the existing structure (SDP). As part of that submittal, we will develop a revised Landscaping Plan which will detail actual impervious areas and existing landscaping. The existing landscape will be incorporated into the proposed buffers which are shown on the revised Concept Plan provided with this submittal. Due to the existing site conditions including: storm water retention areas; utility and drainage easements; asphalt parking areas, the proposed buffers will be provided to the greatest extent practical. c. Rejected Review: Transportation Planning Review Reviewed By: Michael Sawyer Correction Comment 1: Additional Items that need to be addressed for Transportation Operations Review: Rev.1: Please remove condition f. of the current CU. This condition is Not Applicable due to County improvements/expansion of Santa Barbara Response: Item "f" has been removed as noted on the New CU Agreement and the deletion (strikethrough) of this item "f" is shown on the current Resolution 88-76 CU Agreement. Both documents are provided with this submittal. Correction Comment 2: Additional Items that need to be addressed for Transportation Operations Review: Rev.1: Please modify condition g. of the current CU to use current/preferred condition language: "Should stacking or other traffic conflicts cause delays on Santa Barbara, as determined by Collier County staff, the property owner shall provide traffic control by law enforcement or a law enforcement-approved service provider as directed by Collier County staff, with staffing and at location(s) as directed by the Collier County Transportation Administrator or his designee." Response: Item "g" has been removed as noted on the New CU agreement and the change of this item "g" has also been shown on the current Resolution 88-76 CU Agreement. Both documents are provided with this submittal. Page 110 of 590 Mr. Timothy Finn, AICP RE: CU-PL20240006001; Fun Time Early Childhood Academy , Review 1 Response September 16, 2024 Page 3 of 5 Correction Comment 3: Additional Items that need to be addressed for Transportation Operations Review: Rev.1: Please remove condition h. of the current CU. This is a duplication of current ordinance/minimum code requirements. Response: Item "h" has been removed as noted on the New CU agreement and the deletion (strikethrough) of this item "h" is shown on the current Resolution 88-76 CU Agreement. Both documents are provided with this submittal. Correction Comment 4: Additional Items that need to be addressed for Transportation Operations Review: Rev.1: Please remove condition k. of the current CU. This is a duplication of current ordinance/minimum code requirements. Response: Item "k" has been removed as noted on the New CU agreement and the deletion (strikethrough) of this item "k" is shown on the current Resolution 88-76 CU Agreement. Both documents are provided with this submittal. d. Rejected Review: Zoning Review Reviewed By: Timothy Finn Correction Comment 1: Cover Letter - Add evaluation criteria (a through e) responses to this cover letter, please see Evaluation Criteria sheet from another petition (Christ the King Church) as a guide to craft these criteria, sent by planner. In this narrative also add that this is a conditional use for a "childcare center" in the RMF-12 zoning district from LDC Section 2.03.02(C)(1)(c)(1). Response: A new Evaluation Criteria document has been provided with this submittal which incorporates information provided in the above comment and previously provided information from the pre-app meeting notes. All items, a through e, have been addressed. Correction Comment 2: Exhibit B, Conditions of Approval, please adhere to the following: - As to condition a, please contact Landscape Review, Mark Templeton as to any modifications for this condition. - Remove the following conditions: b, c, d, e, f, h, i, j, k, and n. - Rewrite and alphabetize all remaining conditions of approval into a new sheet. Incorporate any suggested modifications by staff into these remaining conditions of approval as well. As a guide in crafting this new sheet, please see the Golden Gate Water Reclamation Facility Conditional Use - Proposed Conditions of Approval sheet, sent by planner. Page 111 of 590 Mr. Timothy Finn, AICP RE: CU-PL20240006001; Fun Time Early Childhood Academy , Review 1 Response September 16, 2024 Page 4 of 5 Response: All listed conditions have been shown deleted (strikethrough), except for item "j", on the current Resolution 88-76 CU Agreement. We have prepared a new Condition Use agreement incorporating changes recommended by the staff. Item "j" has been revised to say "Food may be prepared on site for staff and students only". This revision has been shown on the current Resolution 88-76 CU Agreement and on the new Condition Use agreement. Both documents are provided with this submittal. e. Rejected Review: County Attorney Review Reviewed By: Derek Perry Correction Comment 1: On the property ownership disclosure form; because the entity is a not for profit corporation, please state such. Further, please list all board members on the form. Response: We have incorporated the “not-for-profit” comment and listed all current board members on the revised property disclosure form provided with this submittal. Correction Comment 2: For the affidavit of authorization, please provide evidence of signing authority (e.g., a resolution, secretary’s certificate, etc.). In Florida, only the president, vice president, or CEO has apparent authority. Please update with the full legal name of FUN TIME EARLY CHILDHOOD ACADEMY, INC. Response: The evidence of signing authority and revised Affidavit of Authorization, which includes the full legal name and the words "not-for-profit", are provided with this submittal Correction Comment 3: Please work with assigned planner Timothy Finn to ensure that the removal of the existing condition does not create any unintended consequences; and discuss whether modifying the condition or specifying the nature of the condition would be more appropriate (such as a condition allowing food to be prepared on site for staff and students only). Additionally, please contemplate other safe guards; such as the dumper storage of food waste and the receiving of food trucks (what times deliveries will be made), to ensure compatibility with the surrounding community. Please feel free to give me a call if you have any questions or need additional information. Response: Item "j" of the current Resolution 88-76 CU Agreement has been revised to state: “Food may be prepared on site for staff and students only". This is noted on the New CU agreement and changes are shown on the current Resolution 88-76 CU Agreement. Both documents are provided with this submittal. Page 112 of 590 Mr. Timothy Finn, AICP RE: CU-PL20240006001; Fun Time Early Childhood Academy , Review 1 Response September 16, 2024 Page 5 of 5 In regards to safe guards, food deliveries will be during normal business hours as is currently done. There is a current dumpster that should accommodate additional waste from the food preparation. Please feel free to contact me should you have any questions. Fun Time Early Childhood Academy, Inc. Jessica Campbell, Executive Director 3144 Santa Barbara Blvd. Naples, FL 34116 Page 113 of 590 Page 114 of 590 Page 115 of 590 Page 116 of 590 Page 117 of 590 Page 118 of 590 Page 119 of 590 Page 120 of 590 Page 121 of 590 Page 122 of 590 Page 123 of 590 Page 124 of 590 Page 125 of 590 Page 126 of 590 Page 127 of 590 Page 128 of 590 Page 129 of 590 Page 130 of 590 Page 131 of 590 Page 132 of 590 12/12/2024 Item # 3.B ID# 2024-1992 PETITION NO. PDI-PL20240002891 – Immokalee Road, approximately 1000 feet west of Juliet Boulevard - Aspire Living, LLC requests an insubstantial change to the Blue Coral Apartments RPUD, Ordinance 21-31 for (1), the addition to Exhibit A, Tract B, Accessory Uses to allow a fenced dog park and sunshade structures; and (2) the addition of a footnote to Table 1 – Development Standards, Accessory Uses adding a north minimum yard requirement for a dog park and sunshade structures. The subject 9.35 +/- acre parcel is located on the south side of Immokalee Road, approximately 1000 feet west of Juliet Boulevard, in Section 30, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida [Coordinator: Timothy Finn, Planner III] Commissioner District 2 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Staff Report - Blue Coral Apartments PDI 2. Attachment A - PUD EXHIBIT A - Revised Permitted Uses - To be adopted with HEX decision 3. Attachment B - PUD EXHIBIT B - Revised Development Standards - To be adopted with HEX decision 4. Attachment C - Consistency Review Memo 5. Attachment D - Original Analysis and Findings 6. Attachment E - ROW Drainage Utility Easement BK6219 PG332 7. Attachment F - Application-Backup Materials 8. Attachment G - Hearing Advertising Signs 9. Attachment H - NIM Materials Page 133 of 590 PDI-PL20240002891, Blue Coral Apartments RPUD Last revised: 11/25/24 Page 1 of 7 Hearing Examiner (HEX) Date: 12/12/24 STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FROM: ZONING DIVISION – ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE:DECEMBER 12, 2024 SUBJECT:PDI-PL20240002891, BLUE CORAL APARTMENTS RPUD PROPERTY OWNER/APPLICANT/AGENT: Property Owner/Applicant: Agent: Aspire Living, LLC Ronald M. Edenfield, P.E. 525 Vine St., Suite #1605 RMEC, LLC Cincinnati, OH 45202 2223 McGregor Blvd. Fort Myers, FL 33901 REQUESTED ACTION: The applicant requests that the Hearing Examiner consider an insubstantial change to the Blue Coral Apartments RPUD, Ordinance 21-31, for (1), the addition to Exhibit A, Tract B, Accessory Uses to allow a fenced dog park and sunshade structures; and (2) the addition of a footnote to Table 1 – Development Standards, Accessory Uses adding a north minimum yard requirement for a dog park and sunshade structures. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject 9.35 +/- acre parcel is located on the south side of Immokalee Road, approximately 1000 feet west of Juliet Boulevard, in Section 30, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. (See Location Map on the following page.) Page 134 of 590 PDI-PL20240002891, Blue Coral Apartments RPUD Last revised: 11/25/24 Page 2 of 7 Hearing Examiner (HEX) Date: 12/12/24 Page 135 of 590 PDI-PL20240002891, Blue Coral Apartments RPUD Last revised: 11/25/24 Page 3 of 7 Hearing Examiner (HEX) Date: 12/12/24 PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: In 2021, the subject property was rezoned from Agricultural (A) Zoning District to Residential Planned Unit Development RPUD per Ordinance Number 21-31 to allow development of up to 234 multi- family rental units, of which 70 are rent restricted as affordable. Currently, 233 units are under construction and the development will be known as Aspire. The applicant requests that the Hearing Examiner consider an insubstantial change to the Blue Coral Apartments RPUD, Ordinance 21-31, for (1), the addition to Exhibit A, Tract B, Accessory Uses to allow a fenced dog park and sunshade structures; and (2) the addition of a footnote to Table 1 – Development Standards, Accessory Uses adding a north minimum yard requirement for a dog park and sunshade structures. LAND USE AND ZONING: This section of the staff report identifies the land uses and zoning classifications for properties adjacent to the PUD. North:Collier Boulevard, a six-lane arterial roadway, then developed residential, with a current zoning designation of Carlton Lakes PUD (3.4 DU/AC), which is approved for residential, commercial, recreational, conservation and water management uses East: Undeveloped land, with current zoning designation of Germain Immokalee CPUD (80,000 SF Gross Floor Area), which is approved for a new and used automotive dealership South: Developed multi-family residential, with a current zoning designation of Livingston Lakes RPUD (6.99 DU/AC), which is approved for multi-family residential units and currently developed at 4.92 DU/AC. West: Developed multi-family residential, with a current zoning designation of Eboli PUD AKA Bermuda Palms Condominiums (8.92 DU/AC), which is approved for multi- family residential units Page 136 of 590 PDI-PL20240002891, Blue Coral Apartments RPUD Last revised: 11/25/24 Page 4 of 7 Hearing Examiner (HEX) Date: 12/12/24 Aerial Map (Property Appraiser GIS) STAFF ANALYSIS: Comprehensive Planning: Because this application is not adding uses or increasing the intensity of the previously approved uses in the Blue Coral Apartments RPUD, it is consistent with the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the GMP. (See Attachment C – Consistency Review Memo) Conservation and Coastal Management Element: Environmental staff has evaluated the proposed changes to the PUD documents and found no issue with consistency. Transportation Element: Transportation Planning staff has evaluated the proposed changes to the PUD documents and found no issue with consistency. LDC Sections 10.02.13.E.1 and 10.02.13.E.2 set forth the criteria by which insubstantial amendments to a PUD Master Plan and/or minor text changes to a PUD Document are to be reviewed before they can be approved. The criteria and a response to each have been listed as follows: LDC Section 10.02.13.E.1: a. Is there a proposed change in the boundary of the Planned Unit Development (PUD)? No, there is no proposed change in the boundary of the PUD. Page 137 of 590 PDI-PL20240002891, Blue Coral Apartments RPUD Last revised: 11/25/24 Page 5 of 7 Hearing Examiner (HEX) Date: 12/12/24 b. Is there a proposed increase in the total number of dwelling units or intensity of land use or height of buildings within the development? No, there is no proposed increase in the number of dwelling units or intensity of land use or height of buildings within the development. c. Is there a proposed decrease in preservation, conservation, recreation, or open space areas within the development in excess of 5% of the total acreage previously designated as such, or five acres in area? No, there is no proposed decrease in preservation, conservation, recreation, or open space areas within the development as designated on the approved Master Plan. d. Is there a proposed increase in the size of areas used for non-residential uses, to include institutional, commercial and industrial land uses (excluding preservation, conservation or open space), or a proposed relocation of nonresidential land uses? There would be no increase to the size of areas used for non-residential uses and no relocation of non-residential areas. e. Is there a substantial increase in the impacts of the development which may include, but are not limited to increases in traffic generation; changes in traffic circulation; or impacts on other public facilities? No, there are no substantial impacts resulting from this amendment. f. Will the change result in land use activities that generate a higher level of vehicular traffic based upon the Trip Generation Manual published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers? No, there are no substantial impacts resulting from this amendment. g. Will the change result in a requirement for increased stormwater retention, or otherwise increase stormwater discharge? No, the proposed changes will not impact or increase stormwater retention or increase stormwater discharge. It should be noted that since the “Compensating ROW Easement” came after the setbacks shown in PUD Exhibit B, a case can be made that this ROW easement is part of a public acquisition. This action supports the applicant’s contention that the new 15’ compensating ROW is an easement adjacent to the ROW, not a new ROW line. The PUD Master Plan is specific to building locations. As such, it is staffs opinion that the proposed footnote in Exhibit B is acceptable. (See Attachment E – ROW Drainage Utility Easement BK6219 PG332) h. Will the proposed change bring about a relationship to an abutting land use that would be incompatible with an adjacent land use? No. There will be no incompatible relationships with abutting land uses. Page 138 of 590 PDI-PL20240002891, Blue Coral Apartments RPUD Last revised: 11/25/24 Page 6 of 7 Hearing Examiner (HEX) Date: 12/12/24 i. Are there any modifications to the PUD Master Plan or PUD Document or amendment to a PUD ordinance which is inconsistent with the Future Land Use Element or other elements of the Growth Management Plan or which modification would increase the density of intensity of the permitted land uses? No. Comprehensive Planning staff determined the proposed changes to the PUD Document would be consistent with the FLUE of the GMP. Both environmental and transportation planning staff have reviewed this petition, and no changes to the PUD Document are proposed that would be deemed inconsistent with the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) or the Transportation Element of the GMP. This petition does not propose any increase in density or intensity of the permitted land uses. LDC Section 10.02.13.E.2: Does this petition change the analysis of the findings and criteria used for the original application? No, the proposed change does not affect the original analysis and findings for the most recent zoning action in Petition PUDZ-PL20190001600. An excerpt from the staff report prepared for that petition is attached as Attachment D. DEVIATION DISCUSSION: No deviations are being requested as part of this application. NOVEMBER 22, 2024, NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): The applicant conducted a NIM on November 22, 2024, at Towne Place Suites, located at 5425 Juliet Blvd, Naples, FL. The meeting commenced at approximately 5:34 p.m. and ended at 6:12 p.m. Joe Harmon, the agent, conducted the meeting with introductions of the consultant and staff, and gave a PowerPoint. The presentation consisted of an overview of the proposed PDI application. Following the agent’s presentation, the meeting was opened to attendees to make comments and ask the consultant questions regarding the proposed development. The issues discussed were hours of operation, capacity, number of dogs allowed, dog weight restrictions, drainage, size of dog park, location of dog park, surface of dog park, preserve location, dog park rule enforcement, dog waste removal, enhanced buffers, fence type, noise mitigation, and timing of when residences will move in. Most concerns were answered by Joe. Regarding the dog park, Joe discussed that these concerns have been vetted at the SDP stage and were guided under the policies of the original approval of Blue Coral Apartments RPUD via Ordinance 21-31. This PDI petition is for the approval of the shade structures. No commitments were made, and the written NIM summary provided by the agent is accurate. A copy of the NIM Summary, sign-in sheet, and NIM PowerPoint presentation are included in Attachment H. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Collier County Hearing Examiner approve Petition PDI-PL20240002891. Attachments: A) Exhibit A – Revised Permitted Uses B) Exhibit B – Revised Development Standards Page 139 of 590 PDI-PL20240002891, Blue Coral Apartments RPUD Last revised: 11/25/24 Page 7 of 7 Hearing Examiner (HEX) Date: 12/12/24 C) Consistency Review Memo D) Original Analysis and Findings E) ROW Drainage Utility Easement BK6219 PG332 F) Application-Backup Materials G) Hearing Advertising Signs H) NIM Materials Page 140 of 590 EXHIBIT"A" Permitted Uses: The Blue Coral Apartments shall be developed as a Residential use project, which will include studio, one bedroom, two bedroom and three-bedroom apartments with a density of 25 units per acre. The maximum unit total for this PUD shall be 234. Regulations for development of this PUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this document and all applicable sections of the Growth Management Plan (GMD), the Land Development Code (LDC), and the AdministrativeCode in effect at the time of approval of the first Site Development Plan (SDP) or plat. Where the PUD ordinance does not provide development standards, then the provision of thespecific sections of the LDC that are otherwise applicable shall apply. Tract A A. Principal Uses: 1. Preserve B. Accessory Uses: The only accessory uses allowed in the preserve area would be those permitted under LDC sections 4.06.02,•4.06.05.E.I and 3.05.07. Tract B A. Principal Uses: 1. Multi-Family Rental Units 2.Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by Hearing Examiner or the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) by the process outlined in the LDC. B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures including, but not limited to: 1 . Parking garage limited to residents and their guests. 2. Leasing Center 3. Fitness Facility limited to residents and their guests. 4. Clubhouse limited to residents and their guests. 5. Pools/Hot Tubs limited to residents and their guests. 6. Uses and Structures that are accessory and incidental to the Multifamily Residential use. Page 1 of 10 PL20190001600 Blue Coral Apartments PUDZ 9/27/2021 Page 141 of 590 EXHIBIT B DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: Table I below sets forth the development standards for land uses within the proposed Blue Coral Apartments. Standards not specifically set forth within this application shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or Subdivision plat, consistent with RMF-16 zoning. TABLE I DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS PRINCIPAL USES ACCESSORY USES MINIMUM LOT AREA 43,560 Sq. Ft. N/A MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 150 Ft. NIA MINIMUM YARDS (External)* From North 150 Ft. SPS From South 150 Ft. SPS From West 80 Ft. SPS From East 25 Ft. SPS MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN 50% of the bldg. height, not SPS STRUCTURES less than 15' MAXIMUM HEIGHT* Zoned 50 Ft. Actual 50 Ft. Zoned 30 Ft. Actual 30 Ft. MINIMUM FLOOR AREA Studio=450 sf 1 BR=600 sf 2+BR=750 sf Preserve 25' 10' The proposed parking garage is considered an accessory use/structure whether it is attached or detached from the principal structure. It will meet accessory use development standards above. If the parking garage is constructed under the principal structure, the combined height may not exceed the actual height of 50 feet. Page 2 of 10 PL20190001600 Blue Coral Apartments PUDZ 9/27/2021 Page 142 of 590 Growth Management Community Development Department Zoning Division—Comprehensive Planning Section C O N S I S T E N C Y R E V I E W M E M O R A N D U M To: Tim Finn, Planner III, Zoning From: Austin Grubb, Planner III, Comprehensive Planning Date: August 30, 2024 Subject: Immoklee Interchange Residential Infill Subdistrict to the Urban Mixed Use District, PUDI Request for a Dog Park and Two Accessory Sun Shade Structures to be Located in the Existing 150 Foot Setback from Immoklee Road PETITION NUMBER: PL20240002891 PETITION NAME: Aspire Naples, FKA Blue Coral Apartments for an Insubstantial Change to an RPUD. REQUEST: An Insubstantial Change to an RPUD for a dog park with two accessory sun shades within the existing/approved 150 ft. front setback. LOCATION: The 9.35 ± acre parcel is located in the W ½ of the E ½ of the NW ¼ of Section 30, T48, R36, Collier County, Florida less the N 100 feet. The address is 5035 Aspire Way. COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMENTS: The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide for infill multi-family residential development at a density of up to 25 units per acre and to provide affordable residential units to accommodate the workforce in Collier County, thereby advancing the intent of Goal 1 of the Housing Element. The proposed amendment does not affect the applicability of the GMP language, therefore the proposed PDI is consistent with the Future Land Use Designation. CONCLUSION: The policies of the Future Land Use Element of the GMP have been reviewed and applied to this proposal. Staff finds that this use/proposal is insubstantial and a reasonable accessory amenity to the approved principal use of the property and consistent with the GMP and the Subdistrict. PETITION ON CITYVIEW Page 143 of 590 Original Analysis and Findings – Blue Coral Apartments RPUD PUDZ – PL20190001600 PUD FINDINGS: LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5 states that “In support of its recommendation, the CCPC shall make findings as to the PUD Master Plan’s compliance with the following criteria in addition to the findings in LDC Section 10.02.08”: (Zoning Division staff responses in non-bold). 1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. The nearby properties are developed or have been approved for uses of a similar nature. Water and wastewater transmission mains are readily available along Immokalee Road, and a water distribution main is available near the northwest corner of the PUD. A future water distribution main will be made available for looping when the adjacent Germain Immokalee PUD is developed. There are adequate water and wastewater treatment capacities to serve the proposed PUD. 2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contracts, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Documents submitted with the application were reviewed by the County Attorney’s Office and demonstrate unified control. 3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). Comprehensive Planning staff has reviewed the petition and analyzed it for consistency with goals, objectives, and policies of the GMP. They have found the proposed rezoning to be consistent with the GMP, if the companion amendment is approved. 4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on the location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. There are no deviations being requested from the buffering and screening requirements. Compliance with approved standards would be demonstrated at the time of SDP. 5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. There is no deviation from the required usable open space as submitted. Compliance with approved standards would be demonstrated at the time of SDP. Page 144 of 590 6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of ensuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. Compliance with all other applicable concurrency management regulations is required, including but not limited to, plat plans or site development plans. The Public Utilities Division states that the area has adequate supporting infrastructure, including readily available County water and wastewater mains, to accommodate this project. As noted above, Transportation Planning staff finds this petition consistent with the GMP. Operational impacts will be addressed at time of first development order (SDP or Plat), at which time a new TIS will be required to demonstrate turning movements for all site access points. Finally, the project’s development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals, including but not limited to any plats and or site development plans, are sought. 7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. As noted above, Transportation Planning staff finds this petition consistent with the GMP. Operational impacts will be addressed at time of first development order (SDP or Plat). Additionally, the project’s development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought. 8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on a determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to the literal application of such regulations. There are no deviations proposed for the requested RPUD. REZONE FINDINGS: LDC Subsection 10.02.08 F. states, “When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations to the Planning Commission to the Board of County Commissioners…shall show that the Planning Commission has studied and considered the proposed change in relation to the following when applicable.” Zoning Division staff responses are in non-bold: 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) and the elements of the GMP. Comprehensive Planning staff has determined the petition is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the FLUM and other elements of the GMP, if the companion small scale amendment is approved. Page 145 of 590 2. The existing land use pattern. The existing land use pattern related to surrounding properties is described in the Surrounding Land Use and Zoning section of this report. The proposed uses will not change the existing land use patterns in the area. There are various multifamily developments within the surrounding properties. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. The property is zoned A – Rural Agricultural. The application is to rezone to a residential PUD (RPUD), would not create an isolated district. The site, with exception to the properties to the commercial PUD approved to the east, is surrounded by residential PUDs. The current zoning district itself is an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. The existing district boundaries are logically drawn. The proposed PUD boundaries are logical and appropriate. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed rezoning necessary. The proposed change is not necessary. It is a request to rezone by the property owner. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. The proposed change will not adversely influence living conditions within the neighborhood. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. The area has adequate supporting infrastructure, including readily available County water and wastewater mains, to accommodate this project. The Transportation Division states that the roadway infrastructure has adequate capacity to serve the proposed project at this time, i.e., GMP consistent at the time of rezoning as evaluated as part of the GMP Transportation Element consistency review. Operational impacts will be addressed at time of first development order (SDP or Plat). Additionally, the project’s development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. It is not anticipated that the rezone request to RPUD will create drainage problems in the Page 146 of 590 area. Stormwater best management practices, treatment, and storage for this project will be addressed through Environmental Resource Permitting (ERP) with the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). County environmental staff will evaluate the stormwater management system and design criteria at the time of SDP. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. As existing the property is undeveloped, if approved with the recommended maximum zoned height of 55 feet and maximum actual height of 60 feet, there would be a reduction of light and air to adjacent properties. The height of the conceptual building envelope would seriously reduce light and air to adjacent properties particularly to the west and east of the proposed development. The submitted illustrative masterplan and project narrative conceptually proposes the breaking up of the building massing with two large courtyards and a built-in parking garage at a 35 foot maximum actual height within the overall principal building structure facing the Eboli PUD to the west mitigate to some extent the reduction of air and light this change would provide to adjacent area. The location of the proposed 1.18-acre preservation area in the southernmost portion of the property as illustrated as Tract A in the masterplan mitigates to some extent the reduction of air and light the Livingston Lakes PUD. Staff opines that the mentioned mitigations would be more effective with a reduction to the maximum actual zoned height from 60 to 50 feet. 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent areas. This is a subjective determination based upon anticipated results, which may be internal or external to the subject property. Property valuation is affected by a host of factors including zoning; however, zoning by itself may or may not affect values, since value determination is driven by market value. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. Most of the adjacent properties are already developed for commercial or residential uses. The approval of the rezone request from Rural Agricultural District (A) to RPUD is not likely to deter development activity of surrounding property. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasting with the public welfare. If the proposed rezone to RPUD complies with the GMP (if companion amendment is approved) and is found consistent, then it is consistent with public policy and the change does not result in the granting of a special privilege. Consistency with the FLUE is determined to be consistent with public welfare. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. The subject property can be used in accordance with existing zoning; however, the Page 147 of 590 applicant wishes to develop the property for a residential multifamily use and at a greater density than would be allowed be the current zoning. The applicant finds the rezoning to be necessary. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the County. The Zoning Division staff determination is that at the proposed height the multifamily use is out of scale with the needs of the community; the proposed maximum actual height for the principal structure of 60 feet compared to the surrounding two-story residential structures at 35 feet. The adjacent undeveloped commercial parcel known as Germain Immokalee CPUD to the east was approved with a maximum actual height of 60 feet and maximum zoned height of 55 feet for the principal structure. A reduction of maximum height by 10 feet to 50 feet actual height for this development would create a more appropriate transition in scale from commercial to the existing two-story multifamily developments in the neighborhood. 15. Whether is it impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. The application was reviewed and found compliant with the GMP (if the companion amendment is approved) and the LDC. The Zoning Division staff does not review other sites related to a specific petition. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration, which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. Any development anticipated by the RPUD Document would require considerable site alteration, and this project will undergo extensive evaluation relative to all federal, state, and local development regulations during the SDP and/or platting processes, and again later as part of the building permit process. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, as amended. This petition has been reviewed by County staff responsible for jurisdictional elements of the GMP as part of the amendment process and those staff persons have concluded that no Level of Service will be adversely impacted. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. To be determined by the BCC during its advertised public hearing. Page 148 of 590 INSTR 6368195 0R 6219 PG 332 RECORDED 2/2712023 2:42 pr\,t PAGES I CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT AND COIIIPTROLLER CCLLIER COUNTY FLCRIDA DOC@.70 S0 70 REC $69 50 coNS s10.00 THIS INS'I'RI.,}IENT PREPART]I) B}' .t RETUR'lo: (;REGORY K. LA\1'RENCE, ESQT]IRE DEAN, NIE,,\D, EGER'I'oN, BLOODWORl'II, CAPOtTAN() & BOZI\RTH. P.A. .t20 s. oRANCE AVE\tr[, St]tTE 700 ORLAN-DO. FLORI l)A -1280 I PARCEL t.t). # 00191t000006 THls CONVEYANCE ACCEPTED BY:THE BOARO OF COTJNTY COMMISSIONERS, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS oF RESOLUTION NO. 201S39 sp,\( r. ,\lto\'E Ttlts Lt\E toR PRo{ Esst\c t).\T,\SP,\('T: \BO\ E TIIIS LI\E T-oR RE(-ORDI\G t}ATi\ ROAD RIGH'I'-0I'-WAY. DRAINACE, AND UTII,ITY EASENIENT THIS EASEMENT is gsanted this 29th day of Noverrbe? , 2022. by CIG NAPLES' LLC, a Florida limited liability company (hereinafter, "Crantor"), whose address is 525 Vine Street, Suitc 1605, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202, kr COLLIIIR COUNTY, FLORIDA, a political subtlivision of thc State of Florida (hcrcinafter "Grantee"), rvhose address is 3299 Tamiami Trail East, c/o thc Ofllce ofthe County Attorncy, Suite 800, Naples, FL 34112. (Whcrcver usetl herein in the terms "Grantor" and "(irantee" include all the parties to this instrument and their rcspective heirs, legal reprcscntative, successors, and assigns. Grantor and Grantee are used fbr singular or plural, as the contcxt recluires-) WHEREAS, Grantee desires to obtain an casement over, under, upon and across a portion olGrantor's property. NOW THEREITORE, in consitleration of Tcn Dollars ($10.00) and othcr valuable consideration paid by Grantee, the reccipt and sulliciency of uhich is hcrcby acknorvledged. Grantor hereby grants Grantee a perpetual. non-cxclnsive roatl right-ot--way, drainage, and utility casement (the "Eascnrcnt") encumbering the portion of (irantor's propertv dcscribed on Exhibit "A" attachcd hereto (the "Eascnlcnt Arca"). Thc Easeurent shall be tbr road right-of-way, drainagc, and utility purposes and includes the right to cntcr upon aud use thc Easemcnt Area to a) construct, opcratc. nraintain. rcpair, rcplacc and removc (i) roadrvays. drivcways. curbs. sidcrvalks, bikc paths, *'alking trails, bus shellers, lighting, and all structures and other irnprovcmcnts arrcillary to any of thc fbrcgoing, fbr use by thc gcncral public to the extcnt samc is maintaincd as suchl (ii) canals, ditchcs, srvales, carthcn bcrrns, rip-rap, rctaining rvalls and othcr retaining systcms, undcrground pipes, irrigation lines and other typcs of watcr control structures and fhcilitics; and (iii) public utilitics and, rvith lhc Grantee's prior rvrittcn conscnt, privatc utility t'acilitics includes, without [irnitation, fhcilities fbr clcctricity, gas, conlnlunication cablesl and b) place, excavate. use, storc. plant, re'move and dispose olsoil, trccs, Iandscaping, and othcr matcrials and improvcmcnts, including thc removal 1 ( ) l()-ll t:l \ I Qto WHEREAS, Crantor orvns certain real propcrty by virtue of a Trustee's Deed recorded in OR Book 6083 Page 3067, Ofllcial Records of Collier County, Florida; and Page 149 of 590 and disposal of any and all property. real and/or personal, not owned by Grantee to the extent it interferes rvith Grantee's rights hereundcr, without tiabitity to the owner of such property; all as deemed ncccssary or appropriate from time to time by Crantee. The Easement rights granted to Crantee are subject to existing easements, restrictions, rescrvations, and other matters ofrecord, ifany. This Easement constitutes an easement "running with the land" and shall insure to the benellt of Grantee and bc binding upon Grantor and Grantor's successors-in-title. Grantor represents that Grantor's property is not homestead property, not is it contiguous thereto. ISICNATURES APPEAR ON TTIE FOLLOWING PACEI IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has cxccutcd this instrunrcnt on thc day and ycar first written above. 2Ol9-17327.! I \o Page 150 of 590 Sign, sealed and delivered in the presence ol: WITNESSES t(I,{4oal0 Printcd Namc: Printcd N AIIIC: STATE OF ot COLTNTY OF [kt.-r \t"^ GRAN'I'OR: CIG NAPLES, LLC, a Florida timitcd liability company By: CEII MANAGER, LLC, a Florida limitcd liability company, as its Manager uv Dav astos. Manager.I The tbregoing instrument.was acknowledged before me by means of E physical presence or E online norarizarion, this !l\_]uow*J*- .2022, by DAVID J. BASTOS, in his capacity as the Manager of CEII MANAGER, LLC, a F-lorida limited liability company, in its capacity as the Manager of Cp NAPLES, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, on bchalf of the company.whoisMpersonallyknowntomcorEhasproduced-as identit'ication. Gr-5 i:6$&:1 egps Print Name t:.- C.\cJ i'r, ;\:'11. ..,' t l'v\PL€5 INotarySoaU srJ ! of oh{o ay Comm Erpire! Octobar 15, 2027 Notary Public, Strte ol' Commission No.: ;Ot1 -- Ll)-]'i 5 My Corlrmission Expircs: \ C't5 zr Approved as to firnn and L sIl tctl Nanrc: Derpk D Pe Assistant County Attorney oYo3039.17327.v I Page 151 of 590 Consent of Lienholder First Guaranty Bank, a Louisiana banking corporation ("Lienholder"), hereby consents to the grant of the foregoing Road Right-Of-Way, Drainage and Utility Easement by CIC Naples' LLC, a Florida limited liability company, in favor of Collier County, Florida to be recorded in the public records of Collier County, Florida, and joins in the execution hereof to subordinate (i) that certain Open-End Mortgage, Assignment or Rents, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing recorded February 11,2022 in OR Book 6083 Page 3075 and (ii) that certain Open-End Mortgage, Assignment of Rents, Secudty Agreement and Fixture Filing recorded May 22,2022 in OR Book 6130 Page 1337, both in the Public Records of collier county, Florida to said Road Right-of- Way, Drainage and Utility Easement and Lienholder further agtees that in the event of the foreclosure of either of said mortgages or other sale of said property described in the aforesaid mortgages, under judicial or non-judicial proceedings, the same shall be sold subject to said Road Right-Of-Way, Drainage and Utility Easement. SIGNED AND EXECUTED this day of =h.n*'2023 FIRSTGUARANTY BANK By: e.c Title: R The foregoing instrument online notarization, by voluntarily signed the foregoing document for the purpose stated therein. of First G produced uaranty Bank, on behalf of said WITNESS my hand and Notarial Seal this the lQ*ll. day o was acknowl before me by means or the K rat bank, who is e/personally known to me, or o who as identification and who acknowledged that he f Grt..a-,2023 (s!r.{L) ra fa-oay' otary Public, State of rareeaoqy6lf R-/?J at I .rttrlltllrt,f, ..s)^. 49iltii.,.. -..+-g i.. (v ur rj;-lczg, ,r :i ;. " ttoIABY o;'. - - =ti,- rl';h'l' jE: ffiliE*t' 039,17591.v2 CAO Print Name: ta-+k STATE oF 'i(" l-.. t^ , COUNTYC,FJ't.-R;,--?- v lvry Comrni:siorr Expires: Page 152 of 590 Congent JAZ Automotive Properties, LLC, an Ohio limited liability company (*Easement Holder')' hereby consents to the grant of the foregoing Road Right-Of-Way, Drainage and Utility Easement by CIG Naples, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, in favor of Collier County, Florida to be recorded in the public records of Collier County, Florida, and joins in the execution hereof to subordinate that certain Mutual Grant of Easement and Shared Access recorded July l, 2022 in OR Book 6148 Page 1220, Public Records of Collier County, Florida to said Road Right-Of'Way, Drainage and Utility Easement. SIGNED AND EXECUTED this STATE OF Flon d!* COI.]NTY OF JAZ AUTOMOTIVE PRO Ohio limited liability company By Print Name:'1.^.) ; o Title: le 2 LLC, an of JAZ Automotive Properties, LLC, an Ohio limited liability company, on behalf of said limited liability @mpany, who is y' personally known to me, or o who produced The forcgoing instrumeflt was acknowledged before me by means ofJ physical presence or tr online notarization, by . the as identification and who acknowledged that he voluntarily signed the foregoing docunent for the purpose stated therein. * of Aru 202 (SEAL)tate of al My Commission Expires:6>t1 qo -.q'{{x2ffi DENISE SOVKO Notsrv Publlc-Slat6 ot Florid. commi!sion I HH 209980 My Commi!3ion ExPirss F6biulry 17, 2026 03984937.v1 day of WITNESS my hand and Notarial Seal this the Page 153 of 590 EXHIlil',t'*.\* (SEE NTTACHED) O19.t7l17.vl A-1 o 7o Page 154 of 590 f,y:iitEtT A Page_-l otl_ s89'58',32'E 660 05 P.O.C. sEcrDN 30 r .3.s R.26E It\4I\4OKALEE ROAD R-O-W VARIES : R o w EASEMENT o R Boox 17ioPG 139ri lnLrfr € SEM€N! O R 300k.06 t2 sa-o"5832'E 325 05 AERM! OA PAIMS, A CONDOMINIUM s:crDN3a N89',58',32"W 330 00 PROPOSSO iSCONpENSAi N(j ! llc -PARcFr NO 00r,04000006 r BEARINGS ARE BASEOON ITIE NORTH LINE OF sA o sEcTtoN 30 sEtNG solTH s9.sa36' FAST . Tt] S SKETCH MAY HAVE BEENEEOUCED S AND RFsIRICTIONS . SEEATTACHIIENI FOR SEPARAIE LEGAL E I FAx 239 26i t7e7 Eurr. Nro@PEN ENC COir V/EBSIIE.wW PEN€NG COU LEGENOI POC = POINTOF COMMENCEMENT PO B =POINTOF BEGINNING Of,"O R =OFFICIAL RECOROS R.OW = RTGHIOF WAY Ptu 0 60 lgcllEEBlL!@ IS NOI A SURVEY*' SCALE IN FEET 9 CIG NAPLES LLC P-CtG-001 1 1 S-ClG-001.dwg p t't1 SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION OF PART OF'THE NW 1/4 SECTION 30 T]8 S, R.26-E, COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA PENINSU;S. ENGINEERING ! o c o-h" Page 155 of 590 Containing 0.114 acres more or less. Subject to easements and restrictions of record. Bearings are based on the North line of the Northwest Quarter Section 30, Township 48 South, Range 26 East.Collier Cou , Flori da, being Sogrflr 89'58'32" East. PENINSULA& tdrt",t /1 I i$-.i-q*.:, 'h.ffi*$ J n rti P. filaloney, P.S.M. #LS4493 ficate of Authorization #LB-8479 rE{ce: Blue Coral Apartments Comp '{'"' D ED: November 11 , 2022 I ng R-O-Widwg \ AlPage | 1 E};iitglT-. h Page )-_sfz_ LEGAL DESCRIPTION BEING A PART OF THE NORTHWEST OUARTER, OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, (BLUE CORAL APARTMENTS COMPENASTI NG RIGHT-OF-WAY) LEGAL DESCRIPTION Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Section 30, Thence alone the North line of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 30, South 89'58'32" East 660.05 feet to the Northwest corner of the West half of East half the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 30; Thence along the West line of the West half of East half the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 30, South 02'05'43' East 160.10 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and a point on the South line of a 10' Perpetual non-exclusive road R-O-W, drainage and utili$ easement recorded in official records book 4065, page 2897 of the public records of Collier County, Florida; Thence along said line South 89'58'32' East 325.05 feet to a point of the East line of said easement; Thence along said East line North 00"04'48" East 10.00 feet to a point on the South line of a 50' R-O-W Easement recorded in official records book 1719, pages 1396 -'1398 of the public records of Collier County, Florida; Thence along said south line South 89"58'19" East 4.58 feet to a point on the East Line of the West half of East half the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 30; Thence along said East line South 02"05'18" East 25.02 feet; Thence leaving said East line North 89'58'32" West 330.00 feet to a point on the West line of the West half of East half the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 30; Thence along said line North 02"0543' West '15.01 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. il- 2600 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples. Florida, 3:1105 Office 239 401 6700 Far 219.261.1797 Fla Engineer cA 28275 Fla Landscape CA 1C26000632 Fla Surveyor/Mapper 188479 Page 156 of 590 Page 157 of 590 Page 158 of 590 Page 159 of 590 Page 160 of 590 RMEC, LLC 2223 McGregor Blvd., Fort Myers, FL 33901 (239) 789-1951 | www.RMEC-LLC.com INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO RPUD ORDINANCE 2021-31 APPLICATION NARRATIVE The applicant proposes an Insubstantial Change to a RPUD known as Blue Coral Apartments RPUD, Ordinance No. 2021-31, a 9.35+/- acre residential project located on the south side of Immokalee Road just east of Livingston Road. REQUEST The applicant is requesting one (1) change, specifically to allow the use of a dog park with associated shade structures within the required accessory use setback. No changes to the PUD Master Plan are proposed. The revised PUD Document Exhibits A and B have been provided in underline format indicating the change requested. BACKGROUND/PROJECT HISTORY The Blue Coral Apartments RPUD was rezoned from Agricultural to Planned Unit Development (PUD) in 2021 per Ordinance No. 2021-31. The RPUD allows the development of up to 234 multi-family rental units. The Future Land Use designation for the subject property is Urban Residential. The proposed use appears consistent with the Future Land Use Element (FLUE). POLICY LIST AND ADDRESSING FLUE Policy 5.6: New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code. This project and its amenities are compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses by providing a multi-family product similar to our neighbors to the north, south and west. The surrounding land uses to the north, south and west are all residential multi-story, multi-family housing developments, with similar amenities as are provided by this project. FLUE Policy 7.1: The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. Page 161 of 590 Aspire Naples - Blue Coral Apartments PUD, PDI-PL20240002891 September 17, 2024 Immokalee Road, Naples, FL Page 2 of 5 RMEC, LLC 2223 McGregor Blvd., Fort Myers, FL 33901 (239) 789-1951 | www.RMEC-LLC.com This project is connected to a fronting arterial road, Immokalee Road. Internal sidewalks directly connect to the existing sidewalk along the south side of Immokalee Road. FLUE Policy 7.2: The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals. This project incorporates an internal access and a looped driveway configuration as well as a new right turn lane into the property, which negates the need for a traffic signal. FLUE Policy 7.3: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and/or interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. The interconnection of local streets between developments is also addressed in Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element. This project was designed with a point of interconnectivity with our neighbor to the east. This eastern connection was designed as a shared access point to Immokalee Road and an entrance into both properties. FLUE Policy 7.4: The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. This project has provided a completely walkable community with two different types of multi-family housing (apartments and carriage-homes), common open space, and amenity spaces. Amenity spaces include pools, spas, picnic areas, recreation spaces, a dog park and community gathering spaces. The project also has provided a range of housing prices and types by committing a substantial percentage of apartment units as “affordable housing”, targeting first responders and hospital workers. JUSTIFICATION/COMPLIANCE WITH LDC §10.02.13. E.1 The request complies with the thresholds for insubstantial changes to PUDs as outlined in LDC§ 0.02.13.E.1 as follows: a. A proposed change in the boundary of the PUD; No, the request will not impact the existing PUD boundary. b. A proposed increase in the total number of dwelling units or intensity of land use or height of buildings within the development; Page 162 of 590 Aspire Naples - Blue Coral Apartments PUD, PDI-PL20240002891 September 17, 2024 Immokalee Road, Naples, FL Page 3 of 5 RMEC, LLC 2223 McGregor Blvd., Fort Myers, FL 33901 (239) 789-1951 | www.RMEC-LLC.com No, the request will not increase the approved density or intensity, or the height of proposed buildings. c. A proposed decrease in preservation, conservation, recreation, or open space areas within the development not to exceed 5 percent of the total acreage previously designated as such, or 5 acres in area; No, the request will not result in a decrease of preservation, conservation, recreation, or open space areas. d. A proposed increase in the size of areas used for nonresidential uses, to include institutional, commercial, and industrial land uses (excluding preservation, conservation, or open spaces), or a proposed relocation of nonresidential land uses; No, the request does not impact the size of non-residential areas or propose to relocate such use areas within the PUD boundary. e. A substantial increase in the impacts of the development which may include, but are not limited to, increases in traffic generation; changes in traffic circulation; or impacts on other public facilities; No, the request will not result in a substantial increase in the impact of the development. No change to traffic generation, traffic circulation or impacts on other facilities will result from this request. f. A change that will result in land use activities that generate a higher level of vehicular traffic based upon the Trip Generation Manual published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers; No, the request will not generate a higher level of vehicular traffic. No change in land use activities or intensities is being requested. g. A change that will result in a requirement for increased stormwater retention, or will otherwise increase stormwater discharges; No, the request will not result in increased requirements for stormwater retention or increase stormwater discharges. h. A change that will bring about a relationship to an abutting land use that would be incompatible with an adjacent land use; Page 163 of 590 Aspire Naples - Blue Coral Apartments PUD, PDI-PL20240002891 September 17, 2024 Immokalee Road, Naples, FL Page 4 of 5 RMEC, LLC 2223 McGregor Blvd., Fort Myers, FL 33901 (239) 789-1951 | www.RMEC-LLC.com No, the request will not modify any existing uses or intensities, setbacks or buffers that would negatively impact any surrounding land uses or that would be incompatible. i. Any modification to the PUD master plan or PUD document or amendment to a PUD ordinance which is inconsistent with the Future Land Use Element or other element of the Growth Management Plan, or which modification would increase the density or intensity of the permitted land uses; No, the request does not impact the project’s compliance with the Growth Management Plan (GMP). j. The proposed change is to a PUD district designated as a development of regional impact (DRI) and approved pursuant to F.S. § 380.06, where such change requires a determination and public hearing by Collier County pursuant to F.S. § 380.06(19). Any change that meets the criterion of F.S. § 380.06(19)(e)2, and any changes to a DRI/PUD master plan that clearly do not create a substantial deviation shall be reviewed and approved by Collier County under this LDC section 10.02.13; or The Blue Coral RPUD is not designated as a development of regional impact (DRI). k. Any modification in the PUD master plan or PUD document or amendment to a PUD ordinance which impact(s) any consideration deemed to be a substantial modification as described under this LDC section 10.02.13. No, the request is not a substantial modification to the RPUD and may be processed as a PDI pursuant to the LDC and Administrative Code. The request complies with the thresholds for insubstantial changes to PUDs as outlined in LDC§ 10.02.13.E.2 as follows: 1. Does this petition change the analysis of findings and criteria used for the original application? No, the proposed petition does not modify the original analysis of findings and criteria. No change to the permitted land uses, intensities or compatibility with surrounding land uses are being requested as part of the petition. Page 164 of 590 Aspire Naples - Blue Coral Apartments PUD, PDI-PL20240002891 September 17, 2024 Immokalee Road, Naples, FL Page 5 of 5 RMEC, LLC 2223 McGregor Blvd., Fort Myers, FL 33901 (239) 789-1951 | www.RMEC-LLC.com CONCLUSION In summary, the proposed Insubstantial Change will not create any adverse impacts on the RPUD or surrounding land uses. Furthermore, the proposed Insubstantial Change will create a more inviting and effective use of the property amenities. This application will not negatively impact public health, safety, or welfare, and the RPUD will remain consistent with the LDC and GMP. Page 165 of 590 Addressing Checklist (Rev 10/2022) Page 1 of 1 Operations & Regulatory Management Division ● 2800 North Horseshoe Drive ● Naples, FL 34104 ● 239-252-2400 www.colliercountyfl.gov ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following and upload via the CityView Portal with your submittal. Items marked with (*) are required for every application, other items are optional and may not apply to every project. Forms are valid for 6 months following their submittal; an updated form will be required for a new submittal after that timeframe and any time the properties within the project boundary are modified. Additional documents may be attached to this form and can include: -* LOCATION MAP and/or SURVEY showing the proposed project boundary. -List of additional folio numbers and associated legal descriptions. - E-mail from Addressing Official for any pre-approved project and/or street names. LOCATION INFORMATION *FOLIO (Property ID) Number(s) of subject property or properties. [Attach list if necessary] *LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties. [Attach list if necessary] STREET ADDRESS(ES) where applicable, if already assigned. PROJECT INFORMATION Acceptance of this form does not constitute project and/or street name approval and is subject to further review by the Addressing Official. Pre-Approval may be requested by contacting us at GMD_Addressing@colliercountyfl.gov or 239-252-2482 prior to your submittal. CURRENT PROJECT NAME PROPOSED PROJECT NAME PROPOSED STREET NAME(s) LATEST APPROVED PROJECT NUMBER [e.g., SDP-94-##, PPL-2002-AR-####, PL2017000####] Page 166 of 590 Page 167 of 590 Page 168 of 590 Page 169 of 590 Page 170 of 590 Page 171 of 590 Page 172 of 590 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a.If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: Name and Address % of Ownership b.If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address % of Ownership c.If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest: Name and Address % of Ownership Docusign Envelope ID: 9878DEE5-0CD9-42B5-8B99-298E272D3FAD Page 173 of 590 d.If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners: Name and Address % of Ownership e.If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners: Name and Address % of Ownership Date of Contract: ___________ f.If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust: Name and Address g.Date subject property acquired _______________ Leased: Term of lease ____________ years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Viking Partners Naples, LLC/8044 Montgumery Rd, Cincinnati, OH 45236 57.5% CIG Naples, LLC/525 Vine St, Suite 1605, Cincinnati, OH 45202 40% RAHJ Investments, LLC/5661 Independence, Suite 1, Fort Myers, FL 33912 2.5% ASPIRE LIVING, LLC/525 Vine St, Suite 1605, Cincinnati, OH 45202 =100% 02/04/2022 Docusign Envelope ID: 9878DEE5-0CD9-42B5-8B99-298E272D3FAD Page 174 of 590 Date of option: _________________________ Date option terminates: __________________, or Anticipated closing date: ________________ AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form. Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest-holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition’s final public hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. ____________________________________________ ____________ Agent/Owner Signature Date ____________________________________________ Agent/Owner Name (please print) *The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Community Development Department | GMD Portal: https://cvportal.colliercountyfl.gov/cityviewweb Questions? Email: GMDclientservices@colliercountyfl.gov David Bastos Docusign Envelope ID: 9878DEE5-0CD9-42B5-8B99-298E272D3FAD 10/1/2024 Page 175 of 590 Docusign Envelope ID: 9878DEE5-0CD9-42B5-8B99-298E272D3FAD Page 176 of 590 Page 177 of 590 ORDINANCE NO. 2021 - 31 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM AN AGRICULTURAL (A) ZONING DISTRICT TO A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) ZONING DISTRICT FOR THE PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS BLUE CORAL APARTMENTS RPUD, TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT OF UP TO 234 MULTI-FAMILY RENTAL UNITS, OF WHICH 70 WILL BE RENT RESTRICTED AS AFFORDABLE. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF IMMOKALEE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 1000 FEET WEST OF JULIET BOULEVARD, IN SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 9.35± ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PL20190001600] WHEREAS, CIG, LLC, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, to change the zoning classification of the herein described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: The zoning classification of the herein described real property located in Section 30, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from Agricultural (A) Zoning District to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) for a 9.35± acre project to be known as Blue Coral Apartments RPUD, to allow 234 multi-family rental units, in accordance with Exhibits A through F-1 attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps, as described in Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, 20-CPS-01987/1635840/1] 170 Blue Coral Apartments/PL20190001600 09/28/21 Page 1 Page 178 of 590 the Collier County Land Development Code, is/are hereby amended accordingly. SECTION TWO: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State and on the date that the Growth Management Plan Amendment in Ordinance No. 2021 -32 becomes effective. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super-majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this day of p m(- 2021.111 ATTEST:BOARD O COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CRYSTAL i KINZEL, CLERK COLLIE C TY, FLORID By; ,, f _; ' L( QC . By: st a D ty Clerk Penny aylor, Chairman Signr,'M on Y Approved as o f'o;rin and legality: H idi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney Attachments: Exhibit A- List of Permitted Uses Exhibit B - Development and Design Standards Exhibit C - Master Concept Plan Exhibit D - Legal Description Exhibit E - Deviations Exhibit F - Development Commitments Exhibit F-1- Buffer Exhibit This ordinance filed with the e Atary of t1 t t tfic_e the 100'v D- day of and acknowiedgeme t that fili -ceived •is 0 day of Wet h.Il41 20-CPS-01987/1635840/1] 170 By Blue Coral Apartments/PL20190001600 Gouty 09/28/21 Page 2 Page 179 of 590 EXHIBIT"A" Permitted Uses: The Blue Coral Apartments shall be developed as a Residential use project, which will include studio, one bedroom, two bedroom and three-bedroom apartments with a density of 25 units per acre. The maximum unit total for this PUD shall be 234. Regulations for development of this PUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this document and all applicable sections of the Growth Management Plan (GMD), the Land Development Code (LDC), and the AdministrativeCode in effect at the time of approval of the first Site Development Plan (SDP) or plat. Where the PUD ordinance does not provide development standards, then the provision of thespecific sections of the LDC that are otherwise applicable shall apply. Tract A A. Principal Uses: 1. Preserve B. Accessory Uses: The only accessory uses allowed in the preserve area would be those permitted under LDC sections 4.06.02,•4.06.05.E.I and 3.05.07. Tract B A. Principal Uses: 1. Multi-Family Rental Units 2.Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by Hearing Examiner or the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) by the process outlined in the LDC. B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures including, but not limited to: 1 . Parking garage limited to residents and their guests. 2. Leasing Center 3. Fitness Facility limited to residents and their guests. 4. Clubhouse limited to residents and their guests. 5. Pools/Hot Tubs limited to residents and their guests. 6. Uses and Structures that are accessory and incidental to the Multifamily Residential use. Page 1 of 10 PL20190001600 Blue Coral Apartments PUDZ 9/27/2021 Page 180 of 590 EXHIBIT B DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: Table I below sets forth the development standards for land uses within the proposed Blue Coral Apartments. Standards not specifically set forth within this application shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or Subdivision plat, consistent with RMF-16 zoning. TABLE I DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS PRINCIPAL USES ACCESSORY USES MINIMUM LOT AREA 43,560 Sq. Ft. N/A MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 150 Ft. NIA MINIMUM YARDS (External)* From North 150 Ft. SPS From South 150 Ft. SPS From West 80 Ft. SPS From East 25 Ft. SPS MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN 50% of the bldg. height, not SPS STRUCTURES less than 15' MAXIMUM HEIGHT* Zoned 50 Ft. Actual 50 Ft. Zoned 30 Ft. Actual 30 Ft. MINIMUM FLOOR AREA Studio=450 sf 1 BR=600 sf 2+BR=750 sf Preserve 25' 10' The proposed parking garage is considered an accessory use/structure whether it is attached or detached from the principal structure. It will meet accessory use development standards above. If the parking garage is constructed under the principal structure, the combined height may not exceed the actual height of 50 feet. Page 2 of 10 PL20190001600 Blue Coral Apartments PUDZ 9/27/2021 Page 181 of 590 rs3 ' 3 j _ ..4 l aril arum A 0 Z. a y f r P, >t D 1 S i c a a. a 1 1 •owiasrraa4u.s- i l 11 1 R i U€ i i UI I. i ; I I•H s #.2A1iR `- 1 ' ' 1 g is g ie )0 Z F. II 1 i yN 41 3 yq pQ, i m s =w 1 p FA" _, 1 i i , ?/' I 1 gl A 5 i I - •; I a amaAeyI :. ,;i a 1 7O F ; °' 1 1 II e I 1 a m n I l li a 3Z t 1 Q \-11 1 i I 1 1 1 T m OVIVI j G m 7 1 O 4 1 l I n ft 6' I • z 1 I11 yo CAD 41 i m r R-- iis. 11 114' Iii a; a C 1 , i i j ; I is 5 o1 6 , Q ii it :si 12 1 yl a t m Z ra' 1 1, i m 1 1 z Iaw,auoa, 1]' 11 3 x o -o Jac-3 p mNbi.$oQ ova! I,. sJu Page 3 of 10 PL20190001600 Blue Coral Apartments PUDZ 9/27/2021 Page 182 of 590 Exhibit D LEGAL DESCRIPTION (O.R. 5460, PAGE 32) SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 48-RANGE 26 W 1/ 2 OF EA OF NW% OF NW1%, LESS N 100 FT R/W COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA. Page 4 of 10 PL20190001600 Blue Coral Apartments PUDZ 9/27/2021 Page 183 of 590 Exhibit"E" No deviations are requested. Page 5 of 10 PL20190001600 Blue Coral Apartments PUDZ Page 184 of 590 EXHIBIT F LIST OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS PURPOSE The purposed of this Section is to set forth the development commitments for the development of this project. GENERAL 1. One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close-out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUDcommitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this PUD approval, the Managing Entity is CIG Naples, LLC., or its assigns. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by theCounty Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed-out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments. 2. Issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights onthe part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federalagency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law." (Section 125.022, FS) 3. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement ofthe development. 1 of 4 Page 6 of 10 PL20190001600 Blue Coral Apartments PUDZ Page 185 of 590 4. The Master Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit C (Agnoli Barber& Brundage Project No. 20-0003)is an illustrative preliminary development plan. The design elements and layoutillustrated on the Master Plan shall be understood to be flexible, so that the final design may satisfy the Developer's criteria and comply with all applicable requirements of this Ordinance. Changes may be made in accordance with the LDC. TRANSPORTATION 1. The maximum vehicle trip generation for the PUD shall not exceed 100 two-way PM peakhour net new external trips based on the use codes in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual in effect at the time of application for SDP or plat approval. 2. Access to the project will be via a shared access with the property to the east (currently owned by JAZ Automotive Properties LLC) on the eastern property line of this project. If the shared access split by the property line is not granted, a single access will be provided on the subject property only. Developer shall not be required to provide interconnection to the adjacent property to the west or adjacent properties to the east, but commits to cooperating with said adjacent property owners, if, at some time in the future, all of the above referenced adjacent property owners request an interconnection to the subject property. Design, permitting and construction of the shared access shall be at the time of the first SDP or Plat. 3. Access points shown on the PUD Master Plan are considered to be conceptual. Nothing depicted on any such Master Plan shall vest any right of access at any specific point along any property boundary. The number of access points constructed may be less than the number depicted on the Master Plan; however, no additional access points shall be considered unless a PUD amendment is approved. 4. All internal roads, driveways, alleys, pathways, sidewalks, interconnections to adjacent developments shall be operated and maintained by an entity created by the developer in accordance with the applicable regulations of the State of Florida. Collier County shall have no responsibility for maintenance of any such facilities. 5. If any required turn lane improvement requires the use of any existing County rights of way or easement(s), then compensating right-of-way shall be provided at no cost to CollierCounty as a consequence of such improvement(s). 6. Fifteen (15) feet of the northernmost portion of the property just west of the proposed shared access shall be dedicated to Collier County in the form of a road easement in orderto accommodate a right-in eastbound turn lane. Owner shall convey the fifteen (15) foot easement to Collier County at no cost to the County at Page 7 of 10 PL20190001600 Blue Coral Apartments PUDZ 9/27/2021 Page 186 of 590 the time of Site Development Plan approval, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances. ENVIRONMENTAL 1. The southernmost portion of the property shall have a designated preserve. The area of thepreserve shall equate to 15% of the native vegetation on the site. Total native vegetation on the site is 7.89 acres(Passarella &Associates, Inc, Project No. 20CJG3219). 7.89 acresx 15% =1 .18 acre preserve. 2. Preserves may be used to satisfy the landscape buffer requirements after exotic vegetation removal in accordance with LDC sections 4.06.02 and 4.06.05.E. I Supplemental plantings with native plant materials shall be in accordance with LDC section 3.05.07. 3. Ten (10) feet of the southernmost portion of the southern twenty five (25) foot principal setback from the preserve shall have no site alteration, placement of fill, grading, plant alteration or removal or similar activity abutting the preserve. WATER MANAGEMENT 1. Storm water shall not be discharged into the preserve area until it has been fully treated inaccordance with Collier County and Water Management District standards. PUBLIC UTILITIES 1. The developer shall complete a minimum 8" water main loop between the adjacent Eboli(AKA Bermuda Palms) and Germain Immokalee PUDs.The water main shall connect the existing 8" water main serving Bermuda Palms to a future 8" water main to be extended through Germain Immokalee from an existing 8" water main stub-out at Useppa Way. Ifa point of connection at Germain Immokalee does not exist at the time of project development, the water main shall be terminated at the property line with an automatic water main flushing device, as shown in detail W- 2 of the Collier County Utilities Standards Manual, ordinance No. 2004-31. If a connection to the existing 8" water main serving Bermuda Palms is deemed infeasible by Collier County staff at the time of project development, the developer shall instead connect to the existing 20" water main on the north side of Immokalee Road. The water main will be conveyed to the Collier County Water- Sewer District within a County Utility Easement (CUE) at least 15 feet in width, in accordance with the Collier County Utilities Standards and Procedures Ordinance, at no cost to the County or District, and free and clear of all liens and encumbrances, prior to or concurrent with preliminary acceptance of utilities. Page 8 of 10 PL20190001600 Blue Coral Apartments PUDZ 9/27/2021 Page 187 of 590 AFFORDABLE HOUSING 1. Thirty percent (30%) of the total units (70 units) will be rented to Essential Services Personnel ("ESP"). ESP means natural persons or families at least one of whom is employed as police or fire personnel, a child care worker, a teacher or other education personnel, health care personnel or a public employee. Any time that a unit becomes vacant, assuming that less than 70 units are occupied by ESP, the next available unit will be offered to ESP. In the event that no ESP rents the available unit within forty five 45)days of advertisement of its availability, then the unit may be offered to the general public (non-ESP) but shall be restricted to those incomes and rents identified in paragraph 2. below. This commitment to ESP shall remain in effect for a period of time that is 30 years from the date that the development receives its final certificate of occupancy. 2. Notwithstanding paragraph 1 above, these seventy (70) units will be income and rent restricted. Of those seventy units (70), thirty-five (35) of the units will be designated for those households whose incomes are less than 80% of the AMI for Collier County and thirty-five (35) of the units will be designated for households whose incomes are between 80% and 100% of the AMI for Collier County. These units will be committed for a period of 30 years and AMI rent limit adjustments will be made on an annual basis according to the most recent Collier County Board approved Table of Rental Rates for each income category and the number of bedrooms in the unit. LANDSCAPING 1. An enhanced 15' Type "B" Buffer will be provided along the western property boundary, as depicted in Exhibit F-1. The buffer will contain a single row of canopy trees, which shall be a minimum of twenty feet (20') in height at time of planting and shall be spaced twenty-five feet (25') on center; a midstory of two clustered Dahoon Holly trees offset between canopy trees, which shall be 12' in height at the time of planting ,and spaced twenty-five feet on center; and a sixty inch (60") hedge with #10 shrubs spaced four feet (4') on center. The hedge shall be located a maximum of 10' from the western property line. Page 9 of 10 PL20190001600 Blue Coral Apartments PUDZ 9/27/2021 Page 188 of 590 1ll nc1mxON015'PERIMETER DooIBUFFER8r7kDZNZGx o Z7 -.r0 m mom C I 1_ S< FJuiiij O GI _Ix 0 Z m zLl 1 I ti 6V;' ''' 4 Ili R.,' Y Z ^ m6;i4144P N t TI in7,O wx T f, aO t mZ ^ m N T L X oR m O6)V m m o 1A DN nIf Pa w O y Q AST .. z Cm' i S () m 0 ED I o co r m ?. 5'PUE c ao I p 1 rA M o rnZ y xi m @'Prig, 0 D Z 1 CON Dn •c. z C) c m Ei 0...,,,,..:: rn z- -n m 70G7 co in m m T 7a —I 43u5 n- C Q T m Z pQ m A Crcom0jIs•m Zl m o Z O-kV Z-9 0 mooch A I zo rn T D c m 4'" 8- 03 I_ m m Z 0 Page 10 of 10 PL20190001600 Blue Coral Apartments PUDZ 9/27/2021Page 189 of 590 ttil . r. 4,s.Ot :-.:f. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT Of STATE RON DESANTIS LAUREL M.LEE Governor Secretary of State October 6, 2021 Ms. Ann P. Jennejohn, BMR Senior Deputy Clerk II Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court Comptroller of Collier County 3329 Tamiami Trail E, Suite #401 Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Ms. Jennejohn: Pursuant to the provisions of Section 125.66, Florida Statutes, this will acknowledge receipt of your electronic copy of Collier County Ordinance No. 2021-31, which was filed in this office on October 6, 2021. Sincerely, Anya Owens Program Administrator AO/lb R. A. Gray Building • 500 South Bronough Street • Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0250 Telephone: (850) 245-6270 Page 190 of 590 Page 191 of 590 PART OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 48S, RANGE 26E,5035 ASPIRE WAYNAPLES, FLORIDA 34119COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDAPREPARED FOR/OWNED BY:CIG NAPLES, LLC525 VINE STREET, SUITE 1605CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202CONSTRUCTION TYPE PER FLORIDA BUILDING CODE (1&2) building 3f.b.c. occupancy groupSQUARE FOOTAGE BUILDING 1SQUARE FOOTAGE BUILDING 2SQUARE FOOTAGE CARRIAGE HOMESAIR CONDITIONED/NON-AIR CONDITIONEDSPRINKLERED (OR NON-SPRINKLERED)BUILDING HEIGHTLEGAL DESCRIPTIONPROPERTY IDENTIFICATIONBUILDING INFORMATIONSITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS FORPROPERTY ZONING INFOPARCEL STRAP: 000100-030-3B30 FOLIO: 00198000006PUDPLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(rezoned from agricultural)zoning ordinance 2021-31gmp ordinance 2021-32ELEVATIONS BASED ON NORTH AMERICAN VERTICALDATUM OF 1988 (NAVD88). CONVERSION FROM NAVD88TO NGVD29: NAVD88 + 1.224 = NGDV29.PROJECT SITE MAPNOT TO SCALEPROJECT LOCATION MAPNOT TO SCALEREVISIONSNO.DATEREVISION2223 McGREGOR BOULEVARDFORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33901Tel (239) 789-1951http://www.rmec-llc.comCA#32266RMEC, LLC2021-042PROJECT No:SHEET No:Engineering | Water Resources | Environmentaliiiavar-2160,440 SF159,508 SF 10,496 SFA/CYES49.5'SHEET INDEXSheetNumberSheet TitleC-01COVER SHEETC-02NOTES, LEGENDS AND ABBREVIATIONSC-03EXISTING CONDITIONS, TOPO, AERIAL MAP AND CLEARING PLANC-04SITE PLANC-05SITE DETAILC-05ATURN LANE PLANSC-06PAVING AND GRADING PLANC-07DRAINAGE PLANC-08PAVING AND DRAINAGE DETAILSC-09SECTIONS AND DETAILSC-09ASECTIONSC-10UTILITY SITE PLANC-10APLAN AND PROFILESC-11UTILITY DETAILSC-12UTILITY DETAILS 2C-13EROSION CONTROL PLANASPIRE NAPLESPLAN NOTEFEMA FLOOD ZONE DESIGNATION:ZONE "X", "AE" AND "AH"C-01PLANS are ISSUED FOR constructionNOTICE TO ALL CONTRACTORS:IT'S THE LAW IN FLORIDA.2 BUSINESS DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG CALLSUNSHINE 1-800-432-4770.STATE, COUNTIES AND CITIES ARE NOTPART OF THE ONE CALL SYSTEM; THEYMUST BE CALLED INDEPENDENTLY.STOP ! CALL BEFORE YOU DIG !VERTICAL DATUM NOTETHIS ITEM HAS BEEN ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED AND SEALED BYR.M.EDENFIELD, P.E. ON THE DATE ADJACENT TO THE SEAL USING A SHAAUTHORIZATION CODE. PRINTED COPIES OF THIS DOCUMENT ARE NOTCONSIDERED SIGNED AND SEALED AND THE SHA AUTHORIZATION CODEMUST BE VERIFIED ON ANY ELECTRONIC COPIESCOLLIER COUNTYCOLLIER COUNTYCOLLIER COUNTYPROJECTLOCATIONSITE LOCATIONIMMOKALEE ROADINTERSTATE 75 LIVINGSTON ROAD Property area: 9.35 acresflusuburban residentialJULIET BLVD.collier county sdp: 20210002818-sdpSDP#19800006sdpi #pl20230007099 TO sdp-20210002818attachment:XB-1FIRE TRUCK MOVEMENT ACCESS EXHIBITRE-SUBMITTAL #1DATED: 6/8/2216/8/22PER COUNTY RAI #1 LETTER DATED 4/21/22RE-SUBMITTAL #2DATED: 7/28/2227/28/22PER COUNTY RAI #2 LETTER DATED 7/7/2239/15/22PER COUNTY RAI #3 LETTER DATED 9/7/22RE-SUBMITTAL #3DATED: 9/15/22412/23/22MINOR REVISIONS BY OWNERNAP / SDPIDATED: 11/29/22OWNER REVISIONS #5DATED: 4/12/22(FORMERLY KNOWN AS BLUE CORAL APARTMENTS)52/2023per county SDPI rai letter dated 1/20/23611/20/23MINOR REVISION BY OWNEROWNER REVISIONS #6DATED: 6/16/23666Page 192 of 590 D-X D-X XXXXXXXXXXXXXX // // //// //// // //// //// //////////////XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX// //// //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// // //XXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXSHEET NUMBERDATE:PROJECT NO:DATUM:SCALE:SHEET TITLE:PROJECT:CLIENT: NO.DESCRIPTION DATE REVISIONS Engineering | Water Resources | Environmental 2223 McGREGOR BOULEVARD Fort Myers, FL 33901 (239) 789-1951 | CA#32266 RONALD M. EDENFIELD, P.E. FLORIDA LICENSE NO. 45200C-043/9/222021-042NAVD 881" = 60'SITE PLAN ASPIRE NAPLES 5035 ASPIRE WAY NAPLES, FLORIDA 34119 SDP # 19800006 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 525 VINE STREET, SUITE 1605 CINCINNATI, OHIO 452024 STORY APARTMENTBUILDING #1AMENITYCENTER4 STORY APARTMENTBUILDING #2PRESERVE AREA1.18 ACRESCOURTYARDAREA #2COURTYARDAREA #1IMMOKALEE ROADDOG PARK2 STORY CARRIAGE HOMES - BUILDING #3GERMAIN LEXUSPUDBERMUDA PALMSPUDLAND USE TABLETYPEAREA (ACRES) ±PERCENTAGEBUILDINGS2.0321.7%IMPERVIOUS PAVEMENT3.7440.0%OPEN GREEN SPACE2.0221.6%PRESERVE AREA1.1812.6%AREA WITHIN R.O.W. (IMPERVIOUS)0.384.1%TOTAL PROPERTY AREA9.35100.0%PARKING CALCULATION TABLEDESCRIPTIONQUANTITYUNITSREQUIRED CALCSSPACES REQUIREDEFFICIENCIES15APTS1.5PER UNIT231 BEDROOM86APTS1.75PER UNIT1512-3 BEDROOM132APTS2.0PER UNIT264INDOOR RECREATION5000SF.005PER SQ FT25OFFICE/ADMIN2000SF.005PER SQ FT10TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED====>472TOTAL SPACES PROVIDED====>* 392TOTAL HCP SPACESREQUIRED / PROVIDED====>9 / 11BUILDING HEIGHT TABLEBUILDING HEIGHTALLOWED BY PERMITMAXIMUM ALLOWED4 STORY50'PROPOSED BUILDING4 STORY49.5'SETBACK TABLEYARDNORTHWESTEASTSOUTHPRESERVEMINIMUM PUD SET BACK150 FEET80 FEET25 FEET150 FEET25 FEETPROPOSED SETBACKS197 FEET84.9 FEET25.3 FEET181.2 FEET25.25 FEETSURVEY NOTE:SURVEY AND TOPOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION ON THISSHEET WAS TAKEN FROM A SURVEY PERFORMED BYPORTELLA & ASSOCIATES, LLC, LB#7304, DATED 2-2-22.DATUM NOTE:ALL ELEVATIONS REFERENCE NAVD88 VERTICAL DATUM.APPROXIMATE CONVERSION FOR THIS PROJECT:NAVD88 + 1.224' = NGVD29ANY DATUM CONVERSIONS SHALL BE CONFIRMED BY ALICENSED SURVEYOR.PRESERVE AREA MANAGEMENT NOTES:1.NON-NATIVE VEGETATION AND NUISANCE OR INVASIVE PLANTS SHALL BE COMPLETELY REMOVED FROM ALL PRESERVES AND BUFFERS.2.ALL EXOTIC VEGETATION, AS DEFINED BY COUNTY CODES, AND ALL CATEGORY 1 INVASIVE EXOTIC PLANTS, AS DEFINED BY THE FLORIDAEXOTIC PEST PLANT COUNCIL, SHALL BE REMOVED FROM WITHIN PRESERVE AREAS AND SUBSEQUENT ANNUAL REMOVAL OF THESEPLANTS (IN PERPETUITY) SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PROPERTY OWNER.3.TRASH AND REFUSE REMOVAL WILL ALSO TAKE PLACE DURING THE ANNUAL EXOTIC MAINTENANCE EVENTS.4.PRESCRIBED BURNS ARE NOT PERMITTED WITHIN PRESERVE AREAS DUE TO THE PROXIMITY TO RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS.5.PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION (FOR CLEARING PURPOSES), THE PERIMETER OF THE PRESERVE AREAS SHALL BESTAKED/ROPED TO PREVENT ENCROACHMENT INTO PROTECTED AREAS. STAKING/ROPING SHALL STAY IN PLACE UNTIL ADJACENTCONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES ARE COMPLETE.6.SETBACKS FROM EXISTING PRESERVE AREAS ARE SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS.BUILDING UNIT TABLEBUILDING NUMBERUNITS INBUILDINGBUILDING #1107BUILDING #2120BUILDING #36TOTAL233COUNTY PUBLIC ROAD (150' R/W)ASPIRE WAYASPIRE WAY ASPIRE WAY ASPIRE WAYASPIRE WAYASPIRE WAYASPIRE WAYASPIRE WAYEV-1EV-2EV-3EV-4EV-5EV-6EV-7EV-8EV-9EV-10EV-11EV-12EV-13EV-144444466666Page 193 of 590 // // //// ////// //// // // // //// // //// ////////////////////XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX //////// // // // ////////////////////////////////////////////////////// // //////////////////////// ////// ////XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX SHEET NUMBERDATE:PROJECT NO:DATUM:SCALE:SHEET TITLE:PROJECT:CLIENT: NO.DESCRIPTION DATE REVISIONS Engineering | Water Resources | Environmental 2223 McGREGOR BOULEVARD Fort Myers, FL 33901 (239) 789-1951 | CA#32266 RONALD M. EDENFIELD, P.E. FLORIDA LICENSE NO. 45200C-053/9/222021-042NAVD 881" = 40'SITE DETAIL ASPIRE NAPLES 5035 ASPIRE WAY NAPLES, FLORIDA 34119 SDP # 19800006 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 525 VINE STREET, SUITE 1605 CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202 COUNTY PUBLIC ROAD (150' R/W)IMMOKALEE ROAD4-STORYAPARTMENT BUILDING #1FINISHED FLOORELEV = 16.30'FF1F1EDEBGGHAICMATCHLINEMATCHLINEAMENITY CENTERFINISHED FLOOR ELEV = 16.30'4-STORYAPARTMENT BUILDING #2FINISHED FLOORELEV = 16.30'PRESERVE AREA1.18 ACRES102284899551091010101071010710101061010101091010127910810D2 STORY CARRIAGE HOMES - BUILDING #3FINISHED FLOOR ELEV = 16.30'COURTYARDAREA #2(SEE LANDSCAPE PLANSFOR DETAILS)DOGPARK61099851111SURVEY NOTE:SURVEY AND TOPOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION ON THISSHEET WAS TAKEN FROM A SURVEY PERFORMED BYPORTELLA & ASSOCIATES, LLC, LB#7304, DATED 2-2-22.DATUM NOTE:ALL ELEVATIONS REFERENCE NAVD88 VERTICAL DATUM.APPROXIMATE CONVERSION FOR THIS PROJECT:NAVD88 + 1.224' = NGVD29ANY DATUM CONVERSIONS SHALL BE CONFIRMED BY ALICENSED SURVEYOR.SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT NOTES:1.ALL SIGNING AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE F.D.O.T. STANDARDS FOR ROAD AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION, LATESTEDITION, THE F.D.O.T. ROADWAY AND TRAFFIC DESIGN STANDARDS, LATEST EDITION, THE MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES.1.1.PAVEMENT MARKINGS IN COLLIER COUNT RIGHTS-OF-WAY SHALL BE PERMANENT REFLECTIVE TRAFFIC PAINT WITH GLASS BEADS IN ACCORDANCEWITH F.D.O.T. STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS SECTION 710.1.2.PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE PERMANENT REFLECTIVE TRAFFIC PAINT WITHOUT GLASS BEADS WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE STOP BARS,CROSSWALKS, HANDICAP PARKING STRIPES, AND HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE AISLES WHICH SHALL BE PERMANENT REFLECTIVE TRAFFIC PAINT WITHGLASS BEADS, IN ACCORDANCE WITH FDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS SECTION 710.2.MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT MARKINGS AT EXISTING ROADS.3.REMOVE ANY EXISTING SIGNS OR PAVEMENT MARKINGS IN CONFLICT WITH THOSE SHOWN ON PLANS.4.ALL STOP SIGN LOCATIONS SHALL INCLUDE A 24" PAINTED WHITE STOP BAR UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.5.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH THE "STATE OF FLORIDA MANUAL OF TRAFFIC CONTROL AND SAFE PRACTICES FOR STREET AND HIGHWAYCONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE, AND UTILITY OPERATIONS" AND WITH THE "MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES".6.ALL SIGNING, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, STREET NAME SIGNS, ETC. ARE TO BE INCLUDED IN THE LUMP SUM PRICE FOR SIGNING AND MARKING.7.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH AND INSTALL STREET NAME SIGNS IN ACCORDANCE WITH COUNTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. IF POSSIBLE, STREETNAME SIGNAGE TO BE ATOP ALL STOP SIGNS.8.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL BLUE/BLUE RPM'S IN THE CENTER OF THE LANE ADJACENT TO ALL FIRE HYDRANTS.9.THE LOCATION, QUANTITY AND SIZE OF PARCEL SIGNAGE AND ENTRY FEATURES MAY BE MODIFIED WITHIN THE REQUIREMENTS OF COLLIER COUNTY.7KJJCOURTYARDAREA #1(SEE LANDSCAPE PLANSFOR DETAILS)EV-1EV-2EV-3EV-4EV-5EV-6EV-7EV-8EV-9EV-10EV-11EV-12EV-13EV-146A1666Page 194 of 590 SCALE: 1" = 10'SECTION A-ANORTH PROPERTY LINEEXISTINGR/WPROPOSEDR/WEXISTINGEOPFFFFSCALE: 1" = 3'SECTION X-XCURBED ISLAND DRAINAGE FLUMESP/LSCALE: 1" = 10'SECTION E-EEAST PROPERTY LINE AT PARKING LOTP/LSCALE: 1" = 10'SECTION F-FEAST PROPERTY LINE PRESERVEP/LSCALE: 1" = 10'SECTION G-GWEST PROPERTY LINE AT PARKING LOT / BUILDING3:1 MAXFFE = 16.30'P/LSCALE: 1" = 10'SECTION F1PROPERTY LINE AT PRESERVEP/LSCALE: 1" = 10'SECTION D-DEAST PROPERTY LINE AT BUILDINGFFE = 16.3'P/LSCALE: 1" = 10'SECTION H-HWEST PROPERTY LINE AT TRASH COMPACTOR3:1SCALE: 1" = 10'SECTION I-ISOUTH BUILDING TO PRESERVEFFE = 16.30'3:1 MAXP/LSCALE: 1" = 10'SECTION C-CEAST PROPERTY LINE AT SIDEWALKP/LSCALE: 1" = 10'SECTION B-BEAST PROPERTY LINE AT ENTRANCE DRIVE3:1 MAXSCALE: 1" = 10'SECTION J-JPARKING LOT / DRIVE AISLES WITH CHAMBERSFFE = 16.30'FFE = 16.30'SCALE: 1" = 10'SECTION K-KENTRANCE DRIVEEXISTINGR/WPROPOSEDR/WEXISTINGEOPSHEET NUMBERDATE:PROJECT NO:DATUM:SCALE:SHEET TITLE:PROJECT:CLIENT: NO.DESCRIPTION DATE REVISIONS Engineering | Water Resources | Environmental 2223 McGREGOR BOULEVARD Fort Myers, FL 33901 (239) 789-1951 | CA#32266 RONALD M. EDENFIELD, P.E. FLORIDA LICENSE NO. 45200C-093/9/222021-042NAVD 88AS NOTEDSECTIONS AND DETAILS ASPIRE NAPLES 5035 ASPIRE WAY NAPLES, FLORIDA 34119 SDP # 19800006 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 525 VINE STREET, SUITE 1605 CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202 SCALE: 1" = 200'SITE SECTIONS KEY MAPBA1CDEFGHGF1F1XIDESCALE: 1" = 10'TYPICAL HCP RAMP DETAIL 1SCALE: 1" = 10'TYPICAL HCP RAMP DETAIL 2JKSCALE: 1" = 3'EV CHARGER DETAIL4A6Page 195 of 590 Page 196 of 590 Page 197 of 590 RMEC, LLC 2223 McGregor Blvd., Fort Myers, FL 33901 (239) 789-1951 | www.RMEC-LLC.com November 25, 2024 The Intake Team Via E-Permitting Collier County Growth Management Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples ,FL 34104 RE: Blue Coral Apartments RPUD Ordinance No. 21-31 Insubstantial Change to a PUD (PDI) – PL20240002891 Neighborhood Information Meeting Compliance Dear Intake Team: Attached to this cover letter are the following documents in accordance with Collier County’s Neighborhood Information Meeting requirements:  Affidavit of Compliance  Neighborhood Information Meeting Advertisement as shown in the Naples Daily News  Neighborhood Information Meeting Property Owner Letters  Property Owner Mailing List  Affidavit of Publication from the Naples Daily News  Neighborhood Information Meeting Summary  Neighborhood Information Meeting Sign-in Sheet  PowerPoint Presentation (in PDF format)  Recording of the Neighborhood Information Meeting (uploaded separately as an Mp4 file) If you have any questions, you may reach me by telephone or email at joe@rmec-llc.com. Sincerely, RMEC, LLC Joseph Harmon, Vice President Page 198 of 590 Page 199 of 590 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING Petition PDI-PL20240002891 Blue Coral Apartments RPUD The public is invited to attend a neighborhood meeting held by Joseph Harmon, Vice President, of RMEC, LLC and Gregg Fusaro representing Aspire Naples, LLC. on: Friday, November 22, 2024, 5:30 pm at TownePlace Suites, 5425 Juliet Blvd., Naples, FL 34109 Or, join via Zoom: Meeting ID 823 482 6907, Passcode: 0000. The subject property is comprised of approximately 9.35± acres, and is located on the south side of Immokalee Road, approximately 1000 feet west of Julliet Boulevard, in Section 30, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. Aspire Naples, LLC is asking the County to approve this application, which proposes to add ‘dog park’ to our list of proposed uses and to permit shade structures in the dog park, all within the front yard setback. Business and property owners, residents and visitors are welcome to attend the presentation. The Neighborhood Information Meeting is for informational purposes only, it is not a public hearing. If you have questions or comments, they can be directed by mail, phone, fax or e-mail to: RMEC, LLC, c/o Joseph Harmon 2223 McGregor Blvd., Fort Myers, Florida 33901 Phone: 239-771-8834 or email: joe@rmec-llc.com Page 200 of 590 RMEC, LLC 2223 McGregor Blvd., Fort Myers, FL 33901 (239) 789-1951 | www.RMEC-LLC.com November 1, 2024 RE: Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) PDI-PL20240002891, Blue Coral Apartments Dear Property Owner: Please be advised that Aspire Naples, LLC has filed an application (PL20240002891) with Collier County. This Application is seeking approval of an Insubstantial Change to a Planned Unit Development (PDI). The Application requests one (1) change, specifically to allow for the use of a fenced dog park with shade structures within the front yard setback. The subject property is comprised of approximately 9.35± acres, and is located on the south side of Immokalee Road, approximately 1000 feet west of Julliet Boulevard, in Section 30, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. In compliance with the Land Development Code requirements, a Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held to provide you with an opportunity to hear a presentation about this application and ask questions. The purpose and intent of this Neighborhood Information Meeting is to provide the public with notice of an impending zoning application and to foster communication between the applicant and the public. The Neighborhood Information Meeting is for informational purposes only, it is not considered a public hearing. The Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held on Friday, November 22, 2024, 5:30 pm at TownePlace Suites, 5425 Juliet Blvd., Naples, Florida 34109. Online attendance is also available via Zoom. Please visit www.zoom.us, click on “Join” in the top right corner, and enter Zoom Meeting ID: 823 482 6907, Passcode: 0000. If you have questions or comments, they can be directed by e-mail, or phone to : joe@rmec-llc.com, phone 239-771-8834. Sincerely, Joseph Harmon Vice President / Project Manager Page 201 of 590 RMEC, LLC 2223 McGregor Blvd., Fort Myers, FL 33901 (239) 789-1951 | www.RMEC-LLC.com LOCATION MAP Page 202 of 590 1 NAME1 NAME2 NAME3 NAME4 NAME5 NAME6 15165 BUTLER LAKE DR #2-202 REALTY TRUST 8 PUMPKIN PATCH WAY HANOVER, MA 02339---0 15193 BUTLER LAKE DRIVE LLC 583 RIDGEWOOD AVE GLEN RIDGE, NJ 07028---0 4940 COUGAR COURT LLC 212 SAN MATEO DRIVE BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134---0 4940 COUGAR CT SOUTH #101 LLC 212 SAN MATEO DRIVE BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134---0 4945 COUGAR COURT S #101 LLC 212 SAN MATEO DR BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134---8537 4945 COUGAR CT S #102 LLC 212 SAN MATEO DR BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134---8537 4965 SANDRA BAY DRIVE #101 LLC 212 SAN MATEO DRIVE BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134---0 ANDERSON, KENNETH D DOUGLAS B ANDERS 6720 RIVERVIEW AVE MIDDLETON, OH 45042---0 ANITA L VELLA TRUST 605 MIDDLE ST #13 BRAINTREE, MA 02184---0 ARR INVESTMENTS AND CONSTRUCTION LLC 3740 13TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34117---0 ASPIRE LIVING LLC 525 VINE ST #1605 CINCINNATI, OH 45202---0 B P DEVCO LLC 2190 J AND C BLVD NAPLES, FL 34109---2001 BALANICA, ADRIAN MARIA CONTRERAS 15161 PALMER LAKE CIRCLE #1-202 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 BALL FAMILY TRUST 15152 PALMER LAKE CIR #201 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 BERMUDA PALMS UNIT #105 LLC C/O STEVE MECKSTROTH 212 SAN MATEO DR BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134---8537 BERMUDA PALMS UNIT #202 LLC % STEVE MECKSTROTH 212 SAN MATEO DR BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134---8537 BIELECKY JR, EDWARD J MARIA T LEONE 7 THORMAN LN HUNTINGTON, NY 11743---0 BIENER, NEAL & LISA M 15140 PALMER LAKE CIR #101 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 BOVERMAN FAMILY RESTATED &AMENDED TRUST 15205 BUTLER LAKE DR #102 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 BOWEN, ROSANNE E 15157 PALMER LAKE CIRCLE UNIT 202 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 BRANDO, DENNIS LYLE 15173 BUTLER LAKE DR UNIT 102 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 BROCCOLI SR, STEVEN J MARIA E BROCCOLI 9 TABER LN UTICA, NY 13501---0 BROWN II, WILLIAM ELLSWORTH KRISTA BROWN 10808 E. 27TH AVENUE DENVER, CO 80238---0 BROWNSTONE TOWER LLC 5810 LONG PRAIRIE RD #700 PMB 144 FLOWER MOUND, TX 75028---0 BUNCH, W THOMAS & GAIL M 115 ASHTON GROVE PATH #110 GEORGETOWN, KY 40324---0 BUONOCORE, DENNIS JOANN TAVORMINA-BUONOCORE 3035 HORIZON LN #2206 NAPLES, FL 34106---0 BUTLER LAKE DRIVE LLC 271 ROUTE 46W STE H106-107 FAIRFIELD, NJ 07004---0 CACCHIONE, NANCY 4910 COUGAR CT N #1-204 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 CALDWELL, RONALD D 15184 BUTLER LAKE DRIVE #203 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 CAMPANALE, FRANK 3508 ERIE DRIVE ORCHARD LAKE, MI 48324---0 CAMPOBASSO, MARINA ROSA 4965 SANDRA BAY DRIVE #201 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 CAPRIOTTI, JOSEPH E & EILEEN M 15197 BUTLER LAKE DR #201 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 CARDARELLI, ROBERT DANTE 15141 PALMER LAKE CIR #102 NAPLES, FL 34109---9041 CARDONA, ARIEL 15161 PALMER LAKE CIR #102 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 CARLTON LAKES MASTER ASSN INC 8910 TERRENE CT STE 200 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135---0 CARLTON LAKES MASTER ASSN INC 8910 TERRENE CT STE 200 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135---0 CARLTON LAKES MASTER ASSN INC 8910 TERRENE CT STE 200 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135---0 CARLTON LAKES MASTER ASSN INC 8910 TERRENE CT STE 200 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135---0 CAROLLO, CARMEN J 2034 MACARTHUR CT DUNEDIN, FL 34698---0 CAROLYN MONACO TRUST 15188 BUTLER LAKE DR #102 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 CASIMINI, ALEXA ROSE 4970 DEERFIELD WAY #F204 NAPLES, FL 34110---0 CHARBONNEAU, CHERYL 4925 SANDRA BAY DR #2-101 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 CHASING PARADISE LLC 2025 TEAGARDEN LANE NAPLES, FL 34110---0 CHEGWIDDEN, NIALL KENNETH CHERYL NOLLEEN CHEGWIDDEN 4940 DEERFIELD WAY APT 201 NAPLES, FL 34110---2308 CHRIST, ANN JOHN COBB 4925 SANDRA BAY DR #204 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 CIANTI, KIRSTIN 4965 SANDRA BAY DRIVE #203 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 CIOCCA, MARK & LISA 15188 BUTLER LAKE DRIVE #201 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 CKV REAL ESTATE LLC 28280 OLD 41 RD #4 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135---0 CLARK, JEFFREY A & LISA F 15209 BUTLER LAKE DR #201 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 CLEARY FAMILY LLC 56 BAGNELL DR PEBROKE, MA 02359---0 COLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S NAPLES, FL 34104---0 CONLEY INVEST TRUST 15156 PALMER LAKE CIR #201 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 COOK, SUZAN 15148 PALMER LAKE CIR #202 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 CORE TRUST 216 S MOUNTAINVIEW RD BISHOP, CA 93514---0 CORE TRUST DIANE M DOHERTY 4945 COUGAR CT S #105 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 CORMIER, CHRISTA H 16110 JACARANDA WAY LOS GATOS, CA 95032---0 CRESTO, DIANE M 15144 PALMER LAKE CIR #101 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 CROSS, BARBARA & HERBERT L 1021 CLOVER RIDGE MCGREGOR, TX 76657---0 Notice: This data belongs to the Collier County Property Appraiser's Office (CCPA). Therefore, the recipient agrees not to represent this data to anyone as other than CCPA provided data. The recipient may not transfer this data to others without consent from the CCPA. Petition: PL20240002891 | Buffer: 500' | Date: 10/16/2024 | Site Location: 00198000006 POList_500.xls Page 203 of 590 2 CUCINOTTA, JAMI M 15141 PALMER LAKE CIR #202 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 CUNY, JULIA F 15185 BUTLER LAKE DR #201 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 DARRAH, LORIE 15188 BUTLER LAKE DR #203 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 DEBARBIERI, LAURIE A 4910 DEERFIELD WAY APT A101 NAPLES, FL 34110---1395 DEEA LLC 215 WEST 78TH ST APT B NEW YORK, NY 10024---0 DENNIS & LINDA RITCHIE REVOC LIVING TRUST 17511 BUTLER DR #101 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 DIORIO, JASON N 15193 BUTLER LAKE DR #102 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 DONNELLY ET AL, JANE D 4910 DEERFIELD WAY #203 NAPLES, FL 34110---1395 DUFF, NATALIE R 4920 DEERFIELD WAY APT 104 NAPLES, FL 34110---1396 DUGAN, CHELSEA LYNNE 15205 BUTLER LAKE DR #201 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 DUMAS, ROBERT F & THERESA J 39 SHERWOOD DRIVE BROCKPORT, NY 14420---0 DUMITRESCU, SONIA F 4710 NAVASSA LN NAPLES, FL 34119---0 DURKEE, LINDA C 4985 SANDRA BAY DR #104 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 DYCHES, MARTHA L 4925 SANDRA BAY DR #202 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 ELAINE DAMIANI REV TRUST 15177 BUTLER LAKE DR #5 102 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 F & S HAGSPIEL REV TRUST 4910 DEERFIELD WAY #201 NAPLES, FL 34110---1395 FERNANDEZ, RUBEN DARIO MARGARITA DIAZ 4975 SANDRA BAY DR #7-103 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 FERRARA HORVATH, DANA ADAM J HORVATH 2443 POLHEMUS ROAD TOM RIVER, NJ 08753---0 FICHERA, ANNA & FRANK 13214 RINELLA ST VENICE, FL 34293---0 FLANAGAN, PHUONG 13770 CALLISTO AVE NAPLES, FL 34109---0 FLOWER OF LIFE LLC 4940 COUGAR COURT SOUTH #5-204 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 FOLEY, CHERYL ANN MILAINE DE DIEGO 4985 SANDRA BAY DR #204 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 FORRER, JAMES D & ANNE 15193 BUTLER LAKE DR #202 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 FRANK, DIANA M 15136 PALMER LAKE CIRCLE #202 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 FRANKLIN, CATHERINE F 4950 DEERFIELD WAY D 101 NAPLES, FL 34110---0 FUHRO, BRIAN D & CYNTHIA M 2 MISTY RIDGE CIR KINNELON, NJ 07405---0 FURLONG, ELEANOR 15149 PALMER LAKE CIR #101 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 G M & P A WILSON FAMILY TRUST 38 HIGH ROCK AVE APT 5G SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY 12866---0 G&M GIUNTA PROPERTIES LLC 1646 SERRANO CIR NAPLES, FL 34105---0 GARDENA DE FLORES AT LIVINGSTON LLC 6475 CAREMA LN NAPLES, FL 34113---0 GARY A LUNDSBERG LIVING TRUST 801 CHALMERS CT LAKE FOREST, IL 60045---0 GLENDENING, RENE ELIZABETH 15156 PALMER LAKE CIR #202 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 GOHARI, BEHNAZ Y 15153 PALMER LAKE CIR #201 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 GORRAN, MARLO TRACY 15209 BUTLER LAKE DR #101 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 GOTSZLING, MIROSLAWA & MAREK 24519 PARADISE RD MARYVILLE, MO 64468---0 GREENLER, DANIEL P & LISA A 1740 WATERLEAF DR SEWICKLEY, PA 15143---0 GRIFFIN, ROSANNE 4975 SANDRA BAY DR #102 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 GRUBB, DEBORAH ANN & PAUL 422 PRIMROSE DR GREENSBURG, PA 15601---0 HAIKAL, JOHN & HIAM 374 W GLEN EAGLE DR HIGHLAND HEIGHTS, OH 44143---0 HAVEMEIER, KEVIN M 15148 PALMER LAKE CIR #103 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 HEDWORTH, JAMES NICHOLAS 15137 PALMER LAKE CIR #203 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 HEMRICK, PHILIP F & BARBARA 195 SLEEPY HOLLOW ROAD #1295 ATHENS, NY 12015---0 HENDLER, CAROL A & SAM 15213 BUTLER LAKE DR #102 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 HERNANDEZ, MARIA 3344 93RD ST APT 1X JACKSON HEIGHTS, NY 11372---1921 HINGORANI, SANJAY PRADIP TANDON 3185 ST IVES COUNTRY CLUB PKWY DULUTH, GA 30097---2099 HORROCKS, KIRK D & KATHLEEN JO 2431 HEARTH STONE DR GRAND LEDGE, MI 48837---0 HOSKINS, JESSE E PHYLLIS GONZALES HOSKINS 15165 BUTLER LAKE DR #102 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 IDA C KOREY RESIDENCE TRUST 15144 PALMER LAKE CIR #103 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 INNES MCDONALD FAM TRUST 22711 INSPIRATION POINT CANYON LAKE, CA 92587---0 IZZO, JOSEPH M 4935 SANDRA BAY DR #203 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 JACOBS, STEPHEN C & KUM S 26621 BONITA FAIRWAYS BLVD BLDG 35 #105 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135---0 JACOBS, STEPHEN C & KUM S 26621 BONITA FAIRWAYS BLVD BLDG 35 #105 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135---0 JAGELS, ALBERT B 4935 SANDRA BAY DR #3-101 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 JAMICICH III, JOHN KIMBERLY ANN JAMICICH 15173 BUTTLER LAKE DR #4-202 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 JANICE W THOMPSON DEC OF TRUST 123 WESTCHESTER DRIVE AMHERST, OH 44001---3423 JAZ AUTOMOTIVE PROPERTIES LLC 3295 PINE RIDGE ROAD NAPLES, FL 34109---0 JAZ AUTOMOTIVE PROPERTIES LLC 4250 MORSE CROSSING COLUMBUS, OH 43219---0 JE ANDREW GST EX R/E TRUST 15145 PALMER LAKE CIR #19-201 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 JEAN L AULETTA REV TRUST 15141 PALMER LAKE CIR #203 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 JEAN T MCENERY REV LIV TRUST 10433 LONG AVENUE OAK LAWN, IL 60453---4644 JEFFREY K STOLTZNER TRUST LAUREL J STOLTZNER TRUST 1445 DENNISON HOFFMAN ESTATES, IL 60169---4833 JEREMIAS, LAWRENCE 4960 DEERFIELD WAY UNIT 201 NAPLES, FL 34103---0 JIMENEZ GORDO, CARLOS F DIANA POLA JIMENEZ 4860 SW 94TH AVE MIAMI, FL 33165---0 POList_500.xls Page 204 of 590 3 JOHN LOOS IRREV TRUST 4755 TAMIAMI TRAIL N STE #115 NAPLES, FL 34103---0 JOHN, DYLAN E A 7998 HELENA CT AVE MARIA, FL 34142---0 JOSEPH L & CLAIRE M BOTELHO JOINT LIVING TRUST 4965 SANDRA BAY DR #6-102 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 JOYCE E MELKONIAN FAM TRUST 33 BEACON ST STONEHAM, MA 02180---0 JSF USEPPA WAY CMPII LLC %EXTRA SPACE STORAGE, INC PO BOX 71870 6890 S 2300 E SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84171---0 KAUFIELD REVOCABLE TRUST 15137 PALMER LAKE CIR #202 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 KEDZIOR, JANINA 4975 SANDRA BAY DR #104 NAPLES, FL 34109---2683 KERTSER, ALEXANDER TATYANA POSTNAYA 3214 BENICIA CT NAPLES, FL 34109---0 KERTSER, ALEXANDER TATYANA POSTNAYA 3214 BENICIA CT NAPLES, FL 34109---0 KNOTT JR, ROBERT JOSEPH ELIZABETH ANN KNOTT 15173 BUTLER LAKE DR #101 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 KOTTMAN, GARY & MARY 15152 PALMER LAKE CIRCLE #203 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 KRELL, SCOTT M & KATHLEEN A 8303 SUMMIT CEDAR LANE LIVERPOOL, NY 13090---0 KUMIN, GERALD & JUNE 15148 PALMER LAKE CIRCLE #101 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 LAKEVIEW AT CARLTON LAKES COMMOMS ASSOCIATION INC 6704 LONE OAK BLVD NAPLES, FL 34109---0 LAVAGGI, AUDREY CARMEN DI DOMENICO 15181 BUTLER LAKES DR #102 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 LENNERT, CONSTANCE J 4970 DEERFIELD WAY #F-101 NAPLES, FL 34110---2324 LEONARD, JOHN D & SHARON A 4920 DEERFIELD WAY #201 NAPLES, FL 34110---0 LEWANDOWSKI, DAVID & SHARON 15429 LAGUNA HILLS DR FORT MYERS, FL 33908---0 LEWANDOWSKI, DAVID R SHARON A LEWANDOWSKI 15429 LAGUNA HILLS DR FORT MYERS, FL 33908---0 LINDA LANZETTA REV TRUST 15149 PALMER LAKE CIR #103 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 LIUCCI, ROBERT T & CAROL A 4960 DEERFIELD WAY #104 NAPLES, FL 34110---0 LIVINGSTON LAKES CONDO ASSN 24301 WALDEN CENTER RD BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134---0 LIVINGSTON LAKES CONDO ASSN 24301 WALDEN CENTER RD BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134---0 LIVINGSTON LAKES CONDO ASSN 24301 WALDEN CENTER RD BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134---0 LLERENA, LEIDIANA 15209 BUTLER LAKE DR #102 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 LOPRESTI, ALICE 4940 DEERFIELD WAY APT 103 NAPLES, FL 34110---2308 LORD FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST FRANCIS R LORD III 15181 BUTLER LAKE DR #202 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 LOZANO, MARIA ALEX M LOPEZ 4945 COUGAR CT S #4-103 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 MAGDALENA CASTRO REV TRUST 15189 BUTLER LAKE DR NAPLES, FL 34109---0 MALONOUKOS, KAREN T 15145 PALMER LAKE CIR #103 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 MARCA, WILLIAM L & SANDRA H 55 WESTWOOD DRIVE JOHNSON CITY, NY 13790---0 MARGARET A GARRETT REV TRUST 15137 PALMER LAKE CIRCLE #102 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 MARK JOHN MCKNIGHT TRUST 15144 PALMER LAKE CIR #202 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 MARTINEZ, MARIANO & ELISABETH 4975 SANDRA BAY DR #101 NAPLES, FL 34109---2684 MARY REDDICK REV TRUST 4910 DEERFIELD WAY #A102 NAPLES, FL 34110---1395 MASSAI, CLAUDIO & ARIEL 1380 ABBOTT BLVD FORT LEE, NJ 07024---0 MATAJ, XHEMAL 4940 DEERFIELD WAY #102 NAPLES, FL 34110---0 MATHENEY TR, A GROVER LAND TRUST AGREEMENT UTD 06/29/88 PMB PTY 3977/1601 NW 97TH AVE PO BOX 25207 MIAMI, FL 33102---0 MATHENEY TR, A GROVER LAND TRUST AGREEMENT UTD 06/29/88 PMB PTY 3977/1601 NW 97TH AVE PO BOX 25207 MIAMI, FL 33102---5207 MCCLENNING, RICHARD & CINDY 155 COUNTY RD 44 ARGYLE, NY 12809---0 MCGEE, DAVID & CHARLINA 8805 TAMIAMI TR N #324 NAPLES, FL 34108---0 MCKENZIE, PATRICIA A 12142 FINGERBOARD RD MONROVIA, MD 21770---0 MCLEAN, MICHAEL D MELANIE SUE MCLEAN 540 NEAPOLITAN WAY NAPLES, FL 34103---0 MCLEOD, WAYNE LEWIS 4965 SANDRA BAY DR #103 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 MICHAEL P SISAK REV TRUST 15145 PALMER LAKE CIRCLE #101 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 MICK, LAUREN JEAN 4950 DEERFIELD WAY # D-103 NAPLES, FL 34110---0 MOLINA REY, BENJAMMIN 15149 PALMER LAKE CIR #202 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 MORRELL, MICHAEL THOMAS 4910 DEERFIELD WAY #A204 NAPLES, FL 34110---0 MUMFORD, LARRY & CAROL 15197 BUTLER LAKE DR #101 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 NEEL, DEBRA J 15156 PALMER LAKE CIRCLE #23-103 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 NELSON, CHARLTON J ERLINDA RAMOS NELSON 4935 SANDRA BAY DR #3202 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 NOCERA, CARL & ARLENE 15153 PALMER LAKE CIR #101 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 OAKES FARMS INC % FRANCIS A OAKES 7695 SANTA CRUZ COURT NAPLES, FL 34109---0 OMENS, MARK A & ILANA B 1303 HUBER LN GLENVIEW, IL 60026---0 ONEIL, BETHANY A TOM S CHMELIK 7528 CORDOBA CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34109---0 OZSOY, ALP NATALIA N VILLAGRA 16188 ABERDEEN AVE NAPLES, FL 34110---0 PAL, SAMANTHA E 15136 PALMER LAKE CIRCLE #201 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 PALACIO, MARIA JOSE 4935 SANDRA BAY DR #103 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 PALMITANO, SEBASTIAN JOHN MARY PALMITANO 4910 COUGAR CT N #202 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 PAPIROV, ALEXANDER & MARINA 12 KEATING ST STATEN ISLAND, NY 10309---0 PARENTE, DIANE H & JOHN M 4338 MAPLE GROVE DR ERIE, PA 16510---0 PATEL, USHA 15137 PALMER LAKE CIR #201 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 PATRICIA F PEDERSEN REV TRUST 15152 PALMER LAKE CIR #101 NAPLES, FL 34109---9048 POList_500.xls Page 205 of 590 4 PAUL L WESTBROOK REV TRUST ELIZABETH Y WESTBROOK RV TRUST 15161 PALMER LAKE CIR #101 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 PAUL, BEVERLY A 15141 PALMER LAKE CIR #101 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 PAVIA, MICHAEL J & MICHELLE L 58 LAKE ST REHOBOTH, MA 02769---0 PAYETTE, MAUREEN DAVID JORDAN 15137 PALMER LAKE CIR #101 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 PEARL, RONALD L CANDICE A MADISON-PEARL 15177 BUTLER LAKE DRIVE #5-202 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 PENSWICK, MARY F ROBERT F PENSWICK 15156 PALMER LAKE CIR #101 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 PETRONE, ANTHONY GARY SONJA PETRONE 15157 PALMER LAKE CIR #103 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 PHELPS REVOCABLE TRUST 13157 POND APPLE DR E NAPLES, FL 34119---0 PINERO, EDELIA ELISA 27012 ADRIANA CIR #101 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135---0 POSCH, ROBERT L CHRISTINE M LEONETTI 15181 BUTLER LAKE DR #201 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 POTTER, DAVID G 272 GLEN EAGLE CIR NAPLES, FL 34104---5715 PRESCOTT, ASHLEY ELIZABETH 15177 BUTLER LAKE DR #201 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 QUARLES, MARISA 15189 BUTLER LAKE DR #201 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 RAMASKEVICIUS, GINTAUTAS 1242 SW 4TH CT CAPE CORAL, FL 33991---0 RAMOS, DIANA PATRICIA 4925 SANDRA BAY DR #2-103 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 RANDY & RENEE BRENON FAM TRUST 254 SAWGRASS CT NAPLES, FL 34110---0 RANDY & RENEE BRENON FAM TRUST 254 SAWGRASS CT NAPLES, FL 34110---0 RANDY & RENEE BRENON FAM TRUST 6978 HIDDEN OAK DRIVE LOCKPORT, NY 14094---7934 RASHBAUM, MINDY TRACY E LEONARD 15136 PALMER LAKE CIR #102 #102 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 RASMUSSEN, LAUREN ANN OLAF JAMES RASMUSSEN 4935 SANDRA BAY DRIVE #3-204 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 REIDY REVOCABLE TRUST 15188 BUTLER LAKE DR #103 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 REIDY REVOCABLE TRUST 15188 BUTLER LAKE DR #103 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 REILLY, NANCY J 15156 PALMER LAKE CIRCLE #102 NAPLES, FL 34109---9047 REYES ORAMA, YAILIN YUNIESKY MIRABAL GARCIA 4985 SANDRA BAY DR #8-103 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 RICHARD A RECORDS REV TRUST 4985 SANDRA BAY DR #105 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 RICHARDSON, KENNETH R 6381 BOTTLEVBRUSH LN NAPLES, FL 34109---0 RISSOLO, LUCELLY 4945 COUGAR CT S #202 NAPLES, FL 34109---2675 RIVERA, MELVIN & ARADI 4935 SANDRA BAY DR #104 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 ROBERT J DELCO TRUST 11642 UPPER PENINSULA PLACE SAINT JOHN, IN 46373---0 ROCHE, DENIS JAMES KIMBER ANN OBERG 15184 BUTLER LAKE DR #101 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 RODRIGUEZ, JHON JAIRO MARTHA MONICA CARDENAS MORENO 3534 ZANZIBAR WAY NAPLES, FL 34119---0 ROMERO, PATRICIA 4965 SANDRA BAY DR #202 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 RONALD A SEKULICH & NANCY J SEKULICH LIVING TRUST 4940 DEERFIELD WAY #104 NAPLES, FL 34110---2308 ROSALIE LINDBERG REV TRUST 15213 BUTLER LAKE DR #101 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 ROSE, JULIA 4985 SANDRA BAY DR #8-101 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 ROSEN, KYLE RICHMAN 315 CYPRESS WAY W NAPLES, FL 34110---0 RUBINOFF, MARK R SALLY A RUBINOFF 4950 DEERFIELD WAY D201 NAPLES, FL 34110---2306 RUIZ, ANTONIO & MARIA A 10114 PREMIER ST FREDERICKSBURG, VA 22408---0 RUSSELL REVOCABLE TRUST 4940 DEERFIELD WAY #101 NAPLES, FL 34110---0 RUSSO, DOMINICK & KIMBERLY A 4985 SANDRA BAY DR #202 NAPLES, FL 34109---2686 SABADASHKA, VOLODYMYR 4940 DEERFIELD WAY #203 NAPLES, FL 34110---0 SANDRA LYNNE GRATTON REV TRUST 15140 PALMER LAKE CIR #102 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 SANZONE, VINCENZO ELENA G SANZONE 9054 LINDSTORM PLACE MECHANICSVILLE, VA 23111---0 SCHAER, ALFRED E & MARY 15149 PALMER CIR #20-201 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 SCHARF, DANIEL E & RENA D 506 DAWES AVE UTICA, NY 13502---0 SCHUETTE, ROBERT 15201 BUTLER LAKE DR #102 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 SHOEMAKER, LORY J 15149 PALMER LAKE CIRCLE #20-203 NAPLES, FL 34117---0 SHTERENTAL, ZINAYIDA LEON KAYSER 30223 VIEWCREST COURT NOVI, MI 48377---0 SINEGAR, DOREEN 38640 TERRELL DR NORTH RIDGEVILLE, OH 44039---0 SISK, RON & DEBRA 15205 BUTLER LAKE DRIVE #202 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 SKREJPKOVA FLORIDA TRUST 15145 PALMER LAKE CIR #19-202 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 SRAMEK, JANICE ZUKAWSKI 4910 COUGAR CT N #102 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 STANLEY G ADAMCHEK TRUST 15157 PALMER LAKE CIR #102 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 STELLER, JENNIFER L 4940 COUGAR CT S #102 NAPLES, FL 34109---2673 STEPHEN G MATTHEWS LIV TRUST 15 MARIANO DRIVE READING, MA 01867---0 STEPHENS JR, THOMAS SCOTT 4985 SANDRA BAY DR #205 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 STEWART JR, DENNIS RAY VENESA STEWART 3029 WOLF LAKE BLVD NEW ALBANY, IN 47150---0 STOCKWELL, GEORGE M SANDRA K STOCKWELL 57 BENNETTS BRIDGE RD SANDY HOOK, CT 06482---1440 SWEENY, SHARON E JOHNSTON 142 DUCKPOND DR N WANTAGH, NY 11793---0 TARANTINO, JASON S 15153 PALMER LAKE CIR #202 NAPLES, FL 34109---9043 TETZLAFF, ELIANA JEAN 4960 DEERFIELD WAY #203 NAPLES, FL 34110---0 THOMAS & DARYL DURHAM REVOCABLE TRUST 4940 DEERFIELD WAY #204 NAPLES, FL 34110---0 THOMAS E BRIGHAM TRUST PO BOX 560 CHAMPAIGN, IL 61824---0 POList_500.xls Page 206 of 590 5 THOMAS S NAREKIAN TRUST 28413 VERDE LANE BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135---0 TIITF /DOT /ST OF FL PO BOX 1249 TALLAHASSEE, FL 32399---3000 TORRENS, NAILA 15161 PALMER LAKE CIR #201 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 TOWER, KATHERINE C FORREST R TOWER 1322 S WABASH #909 CHICAGO, IL 60605---0 TRAUNERO, EZIO 15201 BUTLER LAKE DR NAPLES, FL 34109---0 TRUDY M CONRY FAMILY TRUST 17121 MARYLAND AVE SOUTH HOLLAND, IL 60473---3449 URAK TRUST 8674 BONVIEW TERR WILLIAMSVILLE, NY 14221---0 V E & K E GUSTAFSON REV TRUST 54691 BELLINGHAM DR SHELBY TOWNSHIP, MI 48316---1299 VASSILIOU, AIMILIA 122 SINGWORTH ST OYSTER BAY, NY 11771---0 VICKERS, JAMES A & SUSAN J 15153 PALMER LAKE CIR #203 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 VILLAFAN, ERIKA 4985 SANDRA BAY DR #201 NAPLES, FL 34109---2686 WALKER, DANIEL O & JILL A 1993 ILER STREET S SALEM, OR 97302---0 WALKER, KELLY E & ELIZABETH A 21502 SHANNONDELL DR AUDUBON, PA 19403---0 WALLACE, PAUL J KATHLEEN M LANT 146 NEW HACKENSACK RD WAPPINGERS FALLS, NY 12590---0 WILLIAM & JULIE HATHAWAY TRUST 15201 BUTLER LAKE DR #101 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 WILLIAMS, RHYS T & GERILYN 28 DYER RD WANTAGE, NJ 07461---0 WINDSONG CLUB APTS LLC 4706 18TH AVE BROOKLYN, NY 11204---0 WINNIK, AGATA 4450 BOTANICAL PLACE CIR # 102 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 WISE, JENNIFER R 15144 PALMER LAKE CIR #203 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 WOJCICKI, CAROL A 356 CHRISTY ROAD EIGHTY FOUR, PA 15330---0 WOLF, MICHAEL A & ELINA M 4920 DEERFIELD WAY #B204 NAPLES, FL 34110---0 XING, YI XUAN 15140 PALMER LAKE CIR #202 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 YATES, CHERYL H CAROLYN S HOFFACKER 15185 BUTLER LAKE DR #101 NAPLES, FL 34109---9030 YOUHANA, ASHOOR ALAN SHARON HOU 15152 PALMER LAKE CIR #102 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 ZAHR, SAMEER 4041 GULF SHORE BLVD N #1004 NAPLES, FL 34103---0 ZASA, DOREEN A 15184 BUTLER LAKE DR #102 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 ZIEGLER, RONALD JANET KURNICK ZIEGLER 4970 DEERFIELD WAY NAPLES, FL 34110---0 ZIZZO, MARY CATHERINE 4970 DEERFIELD WAY #102 NAPLES, FL 34110---0 574732 ONTARIO LIMITED 15 NORTH SERVICE RD DUNSFORD K0M 1L0 CANADA BELL, DEBORAH 133 RUE CHARLESWOOD HUDSON J0P 1H0 CANADA BERMUDA PALMS 2-205 LAND TRUST 28 ROUTE DE VENCE TOURRETTES/LOUP 06140 FRANCE BERMUDA PALMS 3-205 LAND TRUST 11 RUE DE COLMAR CANNES 06400 FRANCE JOSEPH TRIUMBARI INVSTMNT LTD 3 MANSWOOD CRES BRAMPTON L6T 0A3 CANADA MCCULLOUGH EST, ROBERT HENRY % DAVID MCCULLOUGH PR % SUSAN HIND PR 2051 ANGUS COURT BURLINGTON L7M 4X9 CANADA MEIXNER, RAIMUND & IRENE MITTELEHRENBACH 201 LEUTENBACH 91359 GERMANY NAITO, SHINOBA #606 9-7-7 AKASAKA MINATO TOKYO 1070052 JAPAN NASHAT INVESTMENTS LLC 2141 MANOR HILL DRIVE MISSISSAUGA L5M 5H9 CANADA SMITH, KEVIN LUCY RIOLINO 3376 WHISPERING WOODS TER RIDGEWAY L0S 1N0 CANADA THOMSON, JOHN & ROSLYNE FAIRVIEW OF CRAIGIE WHITECAIRNS AB23 8XE UNITED KINGDOM TIPPMANN, GERD & URSULA MATTHAEUSSTR 50 MUELHEIM KAERLIC 56218 GERMANY VASILE, SEBASTIAN MAGDALENA MARA VASILE 111 AVDELL AVE WOODEDGE L4H 1H3 CANADA BERMUDA PALMS A CONDOMIN IUM CARRIAGE HOMES AT LIVING STON LAKES A CONDOMINIUM COACH HOMES AT LIVINGSTO N LAKES A CONDOMINIUM LAKEVIEW I AT CARLTON LA KES A CONDOMINIUM LAKEVIEW II AT CARLTON L AKES A CONDOMINIUM POList_500.xls Page 207 of 590 Page 208 of 590 Page 209 of 590 RMEC, LLC 2223 McGregor Blvd., Fort Myers, FL 33901 (239) 789-1951 | www.RMEC-LLC.com Date: November 25, 2024 To: Timothy Finn, Collier County From: Joseph Harmon, V.P., Project Manager Re: Blue Coral Apartments RPUD Ordinance No. 21-31 Insubstantial Change to a PUD (PDI) – PL20240002891 Neighborhood Information Meeting Compliance Meeting Summary The Neighborhood Information Meeting for PL20240002891 – Blue Coral Apartments PDI (Insubstantial Change to PUD) was held on Friday, November 22, 2024 at 5:30 PM at the TownePlace Suites located at 5425 Juliet Blvd., Naples, FL 34109. Joseph Harmon, Vice President and Project Manager for RMEC, LLC, introduced himself as the person conducting the meeting. There were (2) neighbors that attended in person and (4) four others who attended through the Zoom link. The sign-in sheet is attached. The PowerPoint presentation and Zoom meeting were both started at 5:30 PM. A brief Zoom tutorial was given, asking users to mute their microphones, and to type questions into the Chat tool to be answered at the end. Joseph presented the attached PowerPoint explaining the project. It was explained that the language of the original PUD did not specifically address a “dog park” as an approved use, however it was approved in the SPD. Shade structures were never addressed in the PUD and therefore a PDI was required to include them into the project. A slide was presented that shows that the applicant, Aspire Naples, LLC is requesting to amend the Blue Coral RPUD with (2) two revisions to the Permitted Uses list, and Development Standards Table. 1. The modification to Exhibit “A”, Permitted Uses:, to add language to specifically allow verbiage to include “Fenced dog park and sun shade structures”. 2. The modification to Exhibit “B”, Development Standards Table:, to allow “Minimum Front Yard setback to be reduced down to 35 feet for the accessory uses of Dog Park and Sunshade Structures.” The PowerPoint presentation depicted the location of the Dog Park within the site and provided sample images of fencing and examples of shade structures. It was explained that the park is for residents only with no access for the public. Locations of trash receptacles, doggie waste removal stations, and watering stations were noted. Page 210 of 590 Page 2 of 2 The next steps were reviewed regarding the scheduled HEX meeting, then final determination. Questions from the attendees: 1. What are the hours that the dog park will be open? 2. What is the allowable capacity of the park? 3. What is the policy on number of pets allowed per apartment? 4. Is there a weight and/or breed restriction? 5. What type of surface is being proposed? – Artificial Turf. 6. What will the sound level be, and who enforces noise complaints? – The development will be managed by a property manager that will deal with all on-site issues. 7. How is noise from the park being mitigated? – There are landscape buffers surrounding the park, surrounding the pump station, and surrounding the trash compactor. Then a final enhanced landscape buffer is on the property line separating this project from Bermuda Palms to our west. 8. What happens if a dog escapes the park? – Same as any other similar incident, police and/or animal control can be called. 9. What ensures the structures won’t be blown away in a hurricane? – Structures need to be permitted through the building department and will be designed per code. 10. What is the size of the park? – Approximately 150’ by 25’. 11. What prevents the outside public from using this park? – The project has gated access. 12. Who will clean up any waste? – The residents are responsible for cleaning up after their pets, and the property management company can enforce compliance. 13. When will the project be leasing to residents? – The property management company will be pre-leasing in January 2025. Joseph Harmon, Vice President RMEC, LLC joe@rmec-llc.com (239) 771-8834 Page 211 of 590 Page 212 of 590 ASPIRE NAPLES PDI INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO RPUD PL20240002891 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING NOVEMBER 22, 2024 Page 213 of 590 Agenda Introduction Zoom Tutorial Property Overview PDI Request Questions and Closing Page 214 of 590 ZOOM TUTORIAL Welcome to our HYBRID ZOOM Neighborhood Meeting! Please keep your speaker on MUTE during our brief presentation Following the presentation, we will open the meeting for Q&A Please type in questions using “Chat” tool – we will read these aloud and respond after the presentation is complete Page 215 of 590 ZOOM TUTORIAL Page 216 of 590 Property Overview •9.35 acres •Approved rezone RPUD in 2021 •Approved SDP in 10/2022 •Currently under Construction IMMOKALEE RD INTERSTATE 75LIVINGSTON RDPROJECT SITE Page 217 of 590 Property Overview •Fenced Dog Park •(2) Fabric Shade Structures •Landscape Buffered •Water Stations, benches, waste stations •For Residents only IMMOKALEE RD PROJECT SITE DOG PARK LOCATION Page 218 of 590 PDI Request Request has been made to specifically allow the accessory use of “Dog Park” to our RPUD Allow the use of “Dog Park” and “Shade Structures” in the dog park, within the front yard setback Page 219 of 590 PDI Request – Site Plan Fenced Dog Park and Shade Structures within 35’ of Right of Way IMMOKALEE RD Page 220 of 590 PDI Request – Dog Park Plan Page 221 of 590 PDI Request – Fence & Shade Structure Page 222 of 590 PDI Request – Fence & Shade Structure Page 223 of 590 PDI Request – Fence & Shade Structure Page 224 of 590 Steps to be taken File RPUD PDI application Review and sufficiency by County Planning Staff Conduct Neighborhood Information Meeting Hearing Examiner Approval Page 225 of 590 Final Questions & takeaways Questions from in person attendees Questions from Zoom attendees Page 226 of 590 THANK YOU Joseph Harmon, RMEC, LLC 239-789-1951 Joe@rmec-llc.com www.rmec-llc.com Page 227 of 590 12/12/2024 Item # 3.C ID# 2024-2035 PETITION NO. VA-PL20240001659 –824 and 828 98th Ave North - Request for a variance from Land Development Code Section 5.03.02.C.2.b to increase the required RMF-6 zoned fence height from 6 feet to 8 feet on the west and east side property lines and the south rear property line on approximately 0.38 acres located at 824 and 828 98th Ave North, also known as Lots 37, 38 and part of Lot 39, Block 64 of the Naples Park Unit 5 subdivision in Section 28, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Sean Sammon, Planner III] Commissioner District 2 ATTACHMENTS: 1. PL20240001659 - Staff Report - 824 & 828 98th Ave N(VA) 2. Attachment A - Backup Package 3. Attachment B - Conceptual Site Plan 4. Attachment C - Combined Permits & Certificates of Occupancy 5. Attachment D - Retaining Wall Engineering Letter 6. Attachment E - Legal Ad and HEX Sign Posting Page 228 of 590 VA-PL20240001659 – 824 & 828 98th AVE N Page 1 of 9 November 19, 2024 STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FROM: ZONING DIVISION – ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: DECEMBER 12, 2024 SUBJECT: PETITION VA-PL20240001659; 824 & 828 98th AVE N _____________________________________________________________________________ PROPERTY OWNER/AGENT: Applicant/Owner: Chris Moran 180 1st Avenue N, #3706 St. Petersburg, FL 33701 REQUESTED ACTION: To have the Collier County Hearing Examiner (HEX) consider a request for a variance from Land Development Code (LDC) Section 5.03.02.C.2.b to increase the required RMF-6 zoned fence height from 6 feet to 8 feet on the west and east side property lines and the south rear property line. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is ±0.38 acres located at 824 and 828 98th Ave North, also known as Lots 37, 38 and part of Lot 39, Block 64 of the Naples Park Unit 5 subdivision in Section 28, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (See location map on page 2). Page 229 of 590 VA-PL20240001659 – 824 & 828 98th AVE N Page 2 of 9 November 19, 2024 SITE LOCATION MAP Page 230 of 590 VA-PL20240001659 – 824 & 828 98th AVE N Page 3 of 9 November 19, 2024 PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The subject property is approximately ±0.38-acres, a total of two ±0.19-acres legal conforming lots located in the Residential Multi-Family-6 (RMF-6) zoning district. The owner requests to increase the maximum fence/wall height for the RMF-6 zoned subject property from what is allowed in the LDC Section 5.03.02.C.2.b., which is 6 feet for non-waterfront interior lots that are 1 acre or less. The subject property is currently developed and located approximately 700 feet west of the intersection of US-41 and 98th Avenue N at 824 and 828 98th Avenue N, Naples, FL 34108, and within the Urban Residential Subdistrict as part of the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) of Collier County (See attachment B, Conceptual Site Plan). Historically, the subject property was originally developed and permitted for a duplex residence on January 13, 1972, under permit number 72-118, and a Certificate of Occupancy (CO) was completed on June 26, 1972. The current owner, Mr. Christopher Moran, acquired the property on July 29, 2021. The subject property lot was split into the two lots as it currently exists on January 26, 2022, into two folios 62775920000 and 62775940006. Accordingly, each lot on the subject property has obtained all necessary permits in reference to the project: 62775920000/824 98th Ave Permit Type Permit Date CO Date 72-118 Original Duplex Residence 1/13/1972 6/26/1972 PRBD20210943553 Residence Demolition 9/26/2021 4/8/2024 PRFH20220631317 Residence 8/25/2022 10/3/2024 PRSPL20230102591 Pool 11/15/2023 10/3/2024 PRFW20240309750 Retaining Wall 5/22/2024 7/19/2024 62775940006/828 98th Ave Permit Type Permit Date CO Date PRFH20220731810 Residence 8/22/2022 8/2/2024 PRSPL20230102592 Pool 3/13/2023 8/2/2024 PRFW20240309748 Retaining Wall 5/22/2024 7/19/2024 Tables 1 & 2 list the permit numbers and types, along with the permit issued date and the date of the Certificate of Occupancy for both lots on the subject property. Since then, Mr. Moran has developed both properties with new homes and accessory pools on each lot. Neither the homes nor pools yield any encroachments into the setbacks. In 2024, the two houses were built to a higher elevation, approximately 2 feet higher than the adjacent neighbors, with retaining walls, in order to increase the elevation for the homes and to maintain a similarly elevated yard without a drastic and varying pitch or slope. Since the owner decided to alter the grade of the subject property, the determination of ground level in order to provide the overall height for the fence is subject to LDC Section 5.03.02.F.1.c: “The ground elevation on both sides of the fence or wall. In measuring the height, the ground elevation on the side of the fence or wall location that is at the lowest elevation shall be used as a point from which the height is to be measured.” Page 231 of 590 VA-PL20240001659 – 824 & 828 98th AVE N Page 4 of 9 November 19, 2024 Mr. Moran seeks to build privacy fences but to meet code standards according to LDC Sec. 5.03.02.C.2.b., only a 4-foot fence on the subject property is allowed. However, this won’t provide much privacy on the subject property since it’s short. A 6-foot fence will provide for the desired privacy; however, according to code, the overall height is the combination of the retaining wall and fence, which yields a total of 8 feet. Therefore, the 2-foot increase from what the code allows will provide the owner with the desired privacy and will be consistent with the requested 8-foot fence in the rear yard through the Public Utility Easement (PUE). The owner obtained the necessary Letters of No Objection from both utility holders, Comcast, on October 14, 2024, and from Florida Power & Light (FPL) on October 25, 2024. 824 (left) & 828 (right) 98th Ave N properties. The red lines represent the proposed 6-foot fence in combination with 2-foot retaining walls on the side property lines, and the yellow line is the proposed 8-foot fence in the PUE. Staff recognizes the need for a variance for the principal use for the fence and retaining wall combination on the subject property. Further staff analysis is in response to the variance criteria Page 232 of 590 VA-PL20240001659 – 824 & 828 98th AVE N Page 5 of 9 November 19, 2024 and is included below in the Zoning Division Analysis section. Overall, the owner is requesting what the code allows with a 6-foot fence. However, it will be 2 feet higher due to the permitted retaining walls on which the fence will be installed for the subject property. SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: North: 98th Avenue N and then developed single-family residential with a zoning designation of Residential Multi-Family-6 (RMF-6) zoning district. East: Developed single-family residential with a zoning designation of Residential Multi-Family-6 (RMF-6) zoning district. South: Developed single-family residential with a zoning designation of Residential Multi-Family-6 (RMF-6) zoning district. West: Developed single-family residential with a zoning designation of Residential Multi-Family-6 (RMF-6) zoning district. Aerial Map – Collier County Property Appraiser SUBJECT PROPERTY Page 233 of 590 VA-PL20240001659 – 824 & 828 98th AVE N Page 6 of 9 November 19, 2024 Base Zoning Map – Collier County GIS/ESRI SUBJECT PROPERTY Page 234 of 590 VA-PL20240001659 – 824 & 828 98th AVE N Page 7 of 9 November 19, 2024 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: The subject property is located in the Residential Multi-Family-6 (RMF-6) Zoning District and the Urban Residential Subdistrict designated area as identified in the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) of the GMP. The GMP does not address individual variance requests but deals with the larger issue of the actual use. As previously noted, the subject petition seeks a variance for a privacy fence/wall for the subject property’s use of a single-family home and an accessory swimming pool, which is an authorized use in this land use designation. This land use category is designed to accommodate residential uses, including single-family. The two single-family homes' use and accessories are consistent with the Future Land Use Map of the GMP. As stated, the applicant seeks a Variance for an 8-foot fence in combination with a retaining wall for the RMF-6 zoned subject property, which is an authorized land use. The Growth Management Plan (GMP) does not address individual variance requests related to land use. However, the current use and petition for the subject property is consistent with the GMP. ZONING DIVISION ANALYSIS: The decision to grant a variance is based on the criteria in LDC Section 9.04.03. Staff have analyzed this petition relative to these provisions and offer the following responses: a. Are there special conditions and circumstances existing, which are peculiar to the location, size, and characteristics of the land, structure, or building involved? There is an existing 5-foot public utility easement (P.U.E.) located in the rear of the two adjacent lots. Other than that, no other special conditions and circumstances exist that are peculiar to the location, size, and characteristics of the land, structure, or building involved. b. Are there special conditions and circumstances which do not result from the action of the applicant, such as pre-existing conditions relative to the property, which are the subject of the Variance request? No, there are no special conditions and circumstances that result from the applicant's action, such as pre-existing conditions relative to the property, which is the subject of the variance request. c. Will a literal interpretation of the provisions of this zoning code work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant or create practical difficulties for the applicant? Yes, according to the LDC Sec. 5.03.02.C.2.b code will only allow the owner to install a 4- foot fence on the side property lines. The home and property are at an elevation where the fence is too short to provide efficient privacy. d. Will the Variance, if granted, be the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building, or structure and which promotes standards of health, safety, and welfare? Yes, the variance, if granted, will be the minimum variance that will make possible the Page 235 of 590 VA-PL20240001659 – 824 & 828 98th AVE N Page 8 of 9 November 19, 2024 reasonable use of the land. The owner had to elevate their yard for a newly constructed home on two adjacent properties side by side. A 4-foot fence will not be tall enough to maintain privacy from the adjacent neighbors. The code allows a maximum 6-foot fence for the subject property; however, this becomes 8 feet when combined with the 2-foot retaining wall. A typical 6-foot fence on the side property lines, in combination with a 2- foot retaining wall, and an 8-foot fence along the rear property line, will make it possible for privacy. e. Will granting the Variance confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by these zoning regulations to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district? No, granting this variance will not allow a special privilege when compared to other properties in the same zoning district. Every residence in the RMF-6 zoning district is permitted to install a fence on their property as needed. f. Will granting the Variance be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of this Land Development Code and not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare? Yes, granting the variance will be in harmony with the intent and purpose of this zoning code and not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. The 6-foot fence in the side yards and the 8-foot fence in the rear yard P.U.E. within property lines will not cause injury or harm to the neighborhood. It will also allow privacy for both adjacent properties as well as the neighboring houses since the fence will be a uniform height all around. g. Are there natural conditions or physically induced conditions that ameliorate the goals and objectives of the regulation, such as natural preserves, lakes, golf courses, etc.? No, building an 8-foot fence on the original grade behind the house will not impact the goals and objectives of the regulation, such as natural preserves, lakes, golf courses, etc. It will remain within property lines and won’t impact its surroundings. It will keep the fence at a uniform, consistent height, in line with the overall height of the fence on the sides of the houses. h. Will granting the Variance be consistent with the Growth Management Plan? Granting this regulation would be consistent with the GMP. The Urban Residential Subdistrict, according to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE), single-family residential structures with accessories are permitted uses for the subject property. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) RECOMMENDATION: The EAC does not normally hear variance petitions. Since the subject variance does not impact any preserve area, the EAC did not hear this petition. Page 236 of 590 VA-PL20240001659 – 824 & 828 98th AVE N Page 9 of 9 November 19, 2024 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Collier County Hearing Examiner approve variance petition PL20230014809, a request for a variance from Land Development Code Section 5.03.02.C.2.b to increase the required RMF-6 zoned fence height from 6 feet to 8 feet on the west and east side property lines and the south rear property line., as depicted within Attachment B. Attachments: Attachment A: Backup Package Attachment B: Conceptual Site Plan Attachment C: Combined Permits & Certificates of Occupancy Attachment D: Retaining Wall Engineering Letter Attachment E: Legal Ad and HEX Sign Posting Page 237 of 590 Page 238 of 590 Page 239 of 590 Page 240 of 590 Page 241 of 590 Page 242 of 590 Page 243 of 590 Page 244 of 590 Page 245 of 590 824 & 828 Avenue N. Naples, FL 34108 10/4/2024 Fence Variance request: I am requesting to build a 6’ fence on top of my new yard which has been raised approximately 2’ from original grade. This will allow me to retain privacy from my new yard. This will make my fence elevation appear to be 8’ from the viewpoint of my neighbors. Therefore I am asking for permission. I purchased the original lot with a duplex on 7/29/2021. I was able to split it in two lots. I have built a new home with pool on each new lot. I also build a 2’ retaining wall to maintain a similar elevated yard without drastic pitch/slope. There will be no encroachment into my setbacks or neighbors yard. However my new homes are built at a higher elevation with my yard now approximately 2’ higher than the surrounding neighbors. The two builds were just recently completed in 2024. Because my house and pool deck are raised, I’d like to build a fence for privacy. Due to code I am only permitted to build a 4’ fence on my 2’ raised yard (equaling 6’ total from my neighbors viewpoint). I spoke with my side neighbors and they are in agreement that a 4’ fence would not give privacy since the fence will be too short. A standard 6’ fence in my new yard would allow us this privacy. I am also requesting to add an 8’ fence in the PUE area behind my homes. This will maintain the same overall height of my fence over the connecting area of my 2’ raised yard and the PUE which is still at the original elevation. My yard is now approximately 2’ higher than neighboring yards and my PUE area. This is why I would like to add a 8’ fence in the PUE area so the fence elevation will match the 6’ fence in my yard and maintain that continuous total elevation. Thank you, Chris Moran Page 246 of 590 Page 247 of 590 Page 248 of 590 Page 249 of 590 Nature of Petition 1. Detailed explanation of request: I am requesting to build a 6’ fence on top of my new yard which has been raised approximately 2’ from original grade. This will allow me to retain privacy from my new yard. This will make my fence elevation appear to be 8’ from the viewpoint of my neighbors. Therefore I am asking for permission. I purchased the original lot with a duplex on 7/29/2021. I was able to split it in two lots. I have built a new home with pool on each new lot. I also build a 2’ retaining wall to maintain a similar elevated yard without drastic pitch/slope. There will be no encroachment into my setbacks or neighbors yard. However my new homes are built at a higher elevation with my yard now approximately 2’ higher than the surrounding neighbors. The two builds were just recently completed in 2024. Because my house and pool deck are raised, I’d like to build a fence for privacy. Due to code I am only permitted to build a 4’ fence on my 2’ raised yard (equaling 6’ total from my neighbors viewpoint). I spoke with my side neighbors and they are in agreement that a 4’ fence would not give privacy since the fence will be too short. A standard 6’ fence in my new yard would allow us this privacy. I am also requesting to add an 8’ fence in the PUE area behind my homes. This will maintain the same overall height of my fence over the connecting area of my 2’ raised yard and the PUE which is still at the original elevation. a. Building Permit Numbers: 2. Detailed description of site alterations, including any dredging and filling a. No dredging or filling will be required. 3. Criteria Explanations: a. No – there are no special conditions and circumstances existing which are peculiar to location, size, and characteristics of land, structure, or building involved. b. No – there are no special conditions and circumstances which result from the action of the applicant such as pre-existing conditions relative to the property which is the subject of the variance request. c. No – a literal interpretation of the provisions of this zoning code will not work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant. It will not create practical difficulties on the applicant. d. Yes – the variance, if granted, will be the minimum variance that will make it possible the reasonable use of the land. I had to elevate my yard for a new build home on 2 properties side by side. A 4’ fence will not be tall enough to maintain privacy from neighbors. A typical 6’ fence will make it possible for privacy. Page 250 of 590 e. I do not believe this will allow any special privilege. f. Yes – granting the variance will be in harmony with the intent and purpose of this zoning code, and not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. The 6’ fence in my yard and 8-foot fence in the PUE. within property lines, will not cause injury or harm to the neighborhood. It will also allow privacy to the two properties as well as the neighboring houses since the fence will be a uniform height all around. g. No – building an 8-foot wall behind the house will not impact the goals and objectives of the regulation such as natural preserves, lakes, golf course, etc. It will remain within property lines and not impact its surroundings. It will keep the fence at a uniform, consistent height, in line with the height of the fence on the sides of the houses. h. Yes – granting the variance will be consistent with the Growth Management Plan. Page 251 of 590 1 Lisa Jung To:Chris Moran Subject:RE: Review Comment Letter 1 Follow Up From: Eric Ortman <Eric.Ortman@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2024 10:33 AM To: Chris Moran <cmoran@brightviewfs.com> Subject: Review Comment Letter 1 Follow Up Chris, The CAO deems you as pro se meaning affidavits of authorizaƟon are not needed for Hayden Sloss and Ma Ʃhew Moran. Sorry for the confusion. Respecƞully, Eric Eric Ortman Planner III Zoning Office:239-252-1032 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34114 Eric.Ortman@colliercountyfl.gov Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Page 252 of 590 October 25th, 2024 Chris Moran 824 98th AVE N NAPLES Re: Fence Agreement 824 98TH AVE N NAPLES FL 34108 Name: Chris Moran Thank you for contacting FPL about a fence installation in the utility easement. FPL has no objection to this fence installation and recommends easily removable fence sections at the access area(s). If access to the easement is necessary for any utility work, the homeowner is responsible for the removal and re-installation of the fence. Prior to any digging you must contact Sunshine State One Call of Florida . Contact them either by telephone toll free at 1-800-432-4770 or by e-mail at www.callsunshine.com, forty-eight hours in advance of construction. Sunshine State One Call of Florida will schedule a locator to perform the necessary locates for you at no cost. If I can be of any further assistance, please contact me at 239-367-4156. Sincerely, Orlando Fernandez Engineer II A NEXTera ENERGY Company Florida Power & Light Company, 4105 15th AVE SW, NAPLES, FL 34116 239-353-6090 Page 253 of 590 October 25th, 2024 Chris Moran 828 98th AVE N NAPLES Re: Fence Agreement 828 98TH AVE N NAPLES FL 34108 Name: Chris Moran Thank you for contacting FPL about a fence installation in the utility easement. FPL has no objection to this fence installation and recommends easily removable fence sections at the access area(s). If access to the easement is necessary for any utility work, the homeowner is responsible for the removal and re-installation of the fence. Prior to any digging you must contact Sunshine State One Call of Florida . Contact them either by telephone toll free at 1-800-432-4770 or by e-mail at www.callsunshine.com, forty-eight hours in advance of construction. Sunshine State One Call of Florida will schedule a locator to perform the necessary locates for you at no cost. If I can be of any further assistance, please contact me at 239-367-4156. Sincerely, Orlando Fernandez Engineer II A NEXTera ENERGY Company Florida Power & Light Company, 4105 15th AVE SW, NAPLES, FL 34116 239-353-6090 Page 254 of 590 October 14, 2024 Attn: Chris Moran RE-LONO 824 98th Ave DearLisa, Thank you for contacting Comcast regarding your proposed objection. This is to inform you that Comcast Cable has facilities in the South of Public Utility Easement (PUE). We have no objection of the encroachment into the easement recorded 824 98th Ave N, Naples, FL, 34108. If Comcast facilities are found and/or damaged within the area as described, the Applicant will bear the cost of repairs of said facilities. If you have any further question or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me at If you have any further question or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me at (941) 914-7814. Sincerely, David Lescrynski Manager, Construction SWFL 12600 Westlinks Dr. Suite #4 Fort Myers, FL 33913 Cell (941) 914-7814 David_Lescrynski@Comcast.com Page 255 of 590 October 14, 2024 Attn: Chris Moran RE-LONO 828 98th Ave DearLisa, Thank you for contacting Comcast regarding your proposed objection. This is to inform you that Comcast Cable has facilities in the South of Public Utility Easement (PUE). We have no objection of the encroachment into the easement recorded 824 98th Ave N, Naples, FL, 34108. If Comcast facilities are found and/or damaged within the area as described, the Applicant will bear the cost of repairs of said facilities. If you have any further question or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me at If you have any further question or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me at (941) 914-7814. Sincerely, David Lescrynski Manager, Construction SWFL 12600 Westlinks Dr. Suite #4 Fort Myers, FL 33913 Cell (941) 914-7814 David_Lescrynski@Comcast.com Page 256 of 590 POINTS OF INTEREST:FENCES ARE OVER 5' PUBLIC U.E. Property Address: MAP OF BOUNDARY SURVEY 824 & 826 98TH AVE N NAPLES, FL 34108 15271 NW 60 AVE, Suite 206 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 www.OnlineLandSurveyors.Com SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION : I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS “BOUNDARY SURVEY” IS A TRUE AND CORRECT REPRESENTATION OF A SURVEY PREPARED UNDER MY DIRECTION. THIS COMPLIES WITH THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL STANDARDS, AS SET FORTH BY THE STATE OF FLORIDA BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS AND MAPPER IN CHAPTER 5J-17.051, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE PURSUANT TO SECTION 472.027, FLORIDA STATUTES. SIGNED _________________________ FOR THE FIRM NOT VALID WITHOUT AN AUTHENTIC ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE AND AUTHENTICATED ELECTRONIC SEAL AND/OR THIS MAP IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A LICENSE SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. GUILLERMO A. GUERRERO STATE OF FLORIDA P.S.M. No. 6453 Survey Code:Page 1 of 2 Not valid without all pages.O-7890710/7/2021Survey Date:Page 257 of 590 CHRISTOPHER MORAN ITS'SUCCESSORS AND/OR ASSIGNS AS THEIR INTEREST MAY APPEAR. CERTIFIED TO: LEGAL DESCRIPTION PROVIDED BY OTHERS. EXAMINATION OF THE ABSTRACT OF TITLE WILL HAVE TO BE MADE TO DETERMINE RECORDED INSTRUMENTS, IF ANY, AFFECTING PROPERTY. THE LANDS SHOWN HEREON WERE NOT ABSTRACTED FOR EASEMENT OR OTHER RECORDED ENCUMBERANCES NOT SHOWN ON THE PLAT. THE PURPOSE OF THIS SURVEY IS FOR USE IN OBTAINING TITLE INSURANCE AND FINANCING AND SHOULD NOT BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION, PERMITTING DESIGN, OR ANY OTHER PURPOSE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF ONLINE LAND SURVEYORS INC. UNDERGROUND PORTIONS OF FOOTINGS, FOUNDATIONS OR OTHER IMPROVEMENTS WERE NOT LOCATED. ONLY VISIBLE AND ABOVE GROUND ENCROACHMENTS LOCATED. FENCE OWNERSHIP NOT DETERMINED. WALL TIES ARE TO THE FACE OF THE WALL. BEARINGS ARE BASE ON AN ASSUMED MERIDIAN. BOUNDARY SURVEY MEANS A DRAWING AND/OR GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION OF THE SURVEY WORK PERFORMED IN THE FIELD, COULD BE DRAWN AT A SHOWN SCALE AND/OR NOT TO SCALE. NO IDENTIFICATION FOUND ON PROPERTY CORNERS UNLESS NOTED. NOT VALID UNLESS SEALED WITH THE SIGNING SURVEYORS EMBOSSED OR ELECTRONIC SEAL. DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE PLAT AND MEASURED UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN. ELEVATIONS IF SHOWN ARE BASED UPON N.G.V.D. 1929 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. THIS IS A BOUNDARY SURVEY UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. THIS BOUNDARY SURVEY HAS BEEN PREPARED FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF THE ENTITIES NAMED HEREON, THE CERTIFICATIONS DO NOT EXTEND TO ANY UNNAMED PARTIES. GENERAL NOTES: 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) 9) 10) 11) 12) 13) 14) 15) 16) COLLIER COUNTY UNIC 120067 12021C0193H H 5/16/2012 AH 11.0 10/7/2021Date of Survey: Base Flood Elevation: Flood Zone: Date of Firm Index: Suffix: Panel Number: Community Number: FLOOD INFORMATION: LOT 37 AND 38 AND THE WEST 1/2 OF LOT 39, BLOCK 64, OF NAPLES PARK UNIT NO. 5, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 14, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. 15271 NW 60 AVE, Suite 206 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Phone: (305) 910-0123 Fax: (305) 675-0999 www.OnlineLandSurveyors.Com LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PROPERTY FRONT VIEWLOCATION MAP N.T.S. DRAWN BY: FIELD WORK: FINAL REVISION: COMPLETED: SCALE: SURVEY CODE: V.P. 1" = 30' 10/7/2021 10/07/2021 10/6/2021 O-78907 LB# 7904 G.A.G.CHECKED BY: Survey Code:Page 2 of 2 Not valid without all pages.O-7890710/7/2021Survey Date:Page 258 of 590 additional review notes: Setbacks okay, house, FFE 11.94' NAVD, CL 10.21', digital signature verified. PRFH20220631317 Page 259 of 590 Page 260 of 590 3/7/24, 1:09 PM Print Map https://maps.collierappraiser.com/mapprint.aspx?pagetitle=824 98th aerial&orient=LANDSCAPE&paper=LETTER&minX=392337.144780034&minY=…1/1 824 98th aerial Folio Number: 62775920000 Name: MORAN, CHRISTOPHER Street# & Name: 824 98TH AVE N Build# / Unit#: 64 / 37 Legal Description: NAPLES PARK UNIT 5 BLK 64 LOT 37 & W 12.5FT OF LOT 38 2004. Collier County Property Appraiser. While the Collier County Property Appraiser is committed to providing the most accurate and up-to-date information, no warranties expressed or implied are provided for the data herein, its use, or its interpretation. Page 261 of 590 3/7/24, 1:10 PM Collier County Property Appraiser https://www.collierappraiser.com 1/1 Collier County Proper ty AppraiserProperty Aerial Parcel No 62775940006 Site Address*Disclaimer 828 98TH AVE N Site City NAPLES Site Zone*Note 34108 Open GIS in a New Window with More Features. Page 262 of 590 Page 263 of 590 Page 264 of 590 Page 265 of 590 Page 266 of 590 Page 267 of 590 Page 268 of 590 COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PERMIT PERMIT #: PRBD2021094355301 PERMIT TYPE: DE ISSUED: 10-07-21 BY: APPLIED DATE: 09-14-21 APPROVAL DATE: 09-26-21 MASTER #: COA: JOB ADDRESS: 824 98th AVE N, Building, Unit, Naples826 98th AVE N, Building, Unit, Naples JOB DESCRIPTION: demolition Per Permit Application: demolition of Duplex/Single family, FPL will be capping all electric prior to demo, All structures including pool will be demolished. 824 and 826 98th AVE N JOB PHONE: SUBDIVISION #: BLOCK: LOT: FLOOD MAP: ZONE: ELEVATION: FOLIO #: 62775920000 SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE: 28-48-25 OWNER INFORMATION:CONTRACTOR INFORMATION: CHRISTOPHER MORAN 788 104TH AVE. N NAPLES, FL 34108 APEX SITE AND DEMOLITION CORP. 2240 CORPORATION BLVD. NAPLES, FL 34109 CERTIFICATE #:: LCC20150003839 PHONE: FCC CODE: CONSTRUCTION CODE: 0221 JOB VALUE: $11,000.00 TOTAL RES SQFT: 0 TOTAL COMM SQFT: 0 SETBACKS FRONT: REAR: LEFT: RIGHT: SEWER: WATER: CONTACT NAME: CONTACT PHONE: Per Collier County Ordinance No. 2002-01, as it may be amended, all work must comply with all applicable laws, codes, ordinances, and any additional stipulations or conditions of this permit. This permit expires if work authorized by the permit is not commenced within six (6) months from the date of issuance of the permit. Additional fees for failing to obtain permits prior to the commencement of construction may be imposed. Permittee(s) further understands that any contractor that may be employed must be a licensed contractor and that the structure must not be used or occupied until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued. NOTICE: PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OF ASBESTOS PRODUCTS OR THE DEMOLITION OF A STRUCTURE, FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS REQUIRE THE PERMITTEE (EITHER THE OWNER OR CONTRACTOR) TO SUBMIT A NOTICE OF THE INTENDED WORK TO THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (DEP). FOR MORE INFORMATION, CONTACT DEP AT (239) 344-5600. NOTICE: In addition to the conditions of this permit, there may be additional restrictions applicable to this property that may be found in the public records of this county, and there may be additional permits required from other governmental entities such as water management districts, state agencies, or federal agencies. WARNING TO OWNER: YOUR FAILURE TO RECORD A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MAY RESULT IN YOUR PAYING TWICE FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO YOUR PROPERTY. A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MUST BE RECORDED AND POSTED ON THE JOB SITE BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION. IF YOU INTEND TO OBTAIN FINANCING, CONSULT WITH YOUR LENDER OR AN ATTORNEY BEFORE RECORDING YOUR NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. Page 269 of 590 PRFH2022063131701 COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PERMIT PERMIT #: PRFH2022063131701 PERMIT TYPE: Building DATE ISSUED: August 25, 2022 BUILDING CODE IN EFFECT: FBC 7th Edition 2020 JOB ADDRESS: 824 98th AVE N, (Unit) , Naples FOLIO #: 62775920000 JOB DESCRIPTION: New SFR (ROW:PRROW20220631407) 824 98th AVE N, Unit, Naples, Single Family 4 bed/ 4 bath (4wc) OWNER INFORMATION: MORAN, CHRISTOPHER HAYDEN SLOSS 788 104TH AVE N NAPLES, FL 34108 AREA OF WORK (SQFT): 3504 SETBACKS: FRONT: 25' REAR: 20' P / A LEFT: 7.5' RIGHT: 7.5' FLOOD ZONE: AH SEWER: Sewer WATER: Existing CONTRACTOR INFORMATION:CERTIFICATE #: SCHOLTEN CONSTRUCTION LLC 3940 RADIO RD. SUITE #104 NAPLES, FL 34104 (239) 434-7667 LCC20150001514 SUB CONTRACTOR INFORMATION: STONEWOOD CONSTRUCTION INC 3944 EVERGLADE BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120 (239) 304-9869 Page 270 of 590 PRFH2022063131701 INSPECTION JOB CARD To schedule inspections call 239-252-3726 or visit https://cvportal.colliercountyfl.gov/cityviewweb SETBACKS: FRONT:25'REAR:20' P / A LEFT:7.5'RIGHT:7.5'SPECIAL:FLOOD ZONE: FZAH INSPECTION OUTCOME COMMENTS 115 - Building Final 134 - Roofing Final 203 - Sewer Tap 204 - Plumbing Final 301 - A/C Final 502 - Electrical Final 509 - TV/Telephone Final 801 - Site Drainage Type II Stormwater Plan. Signed & Sealed by PE. MummeChristian 08/01/2022 11:55 AM 802 - Landscaping 810 - Exotic Vegetation Removal OPEN CONDITIONS Condition Type:Condition Description: CO Hold Waiting for Blower Door Test documentation. Upload to the condition on the portal. Per plans not greater than 5.0 ACH50 CO Hold Waiting for Final Energy Calc Summary Sheet. Upload to the condition on the portal. Informational FEMA - All equipment must be above flood plus one foot. Any materials used below flood level must comply with FEMA regulations CO Hold Soil Compaction Test. Upload to the condition on the portal. CO Hold Any required County impact fees will be due prior to issuance of a temporary or final Certificate of Occupancy CO Hold > Elevation Certificate Flood zone AH 11 NAVD; prop FFE=12.6' NAVD; COR=10.21 NAVD; Garage (LP) 12.1' NAVD per SW plan stamped 6/24/22 (Wunder); Garage meets BFE+1 foot at LP; CO Hold This building permit has a Type II stormwater management plan, signed and sealed by a registered Florida Professional Engineer as was reviewed by Development Review. Prior to scheduling the 801 inspection, please upload the signed and sealed stormwater certification letter to the condition in the portal. If you have further questions, please contact Engineering Services at 239-252-2417. Informational Use the form located at https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/home/showdocument?id=105797&t=638403984984558370 to request Page 271 of 590 PRFH2022063131701 Permit extensions, cancellations, and changes/withdrawals of Contractors, Subcontractors and Qualifiers. Instructions are provided with the form. Change/withdrawal of contractor does not apply to self-issued permits. Contact Building Permit Resolution Services at 239-252-2493 for assistance completing the form. Submit the form by clicking the Browse button below. Inspection Hold Sub Contractor (Plumbing) Upload to the condition on portal. Inspection Hold Sub Contractor (Electrical) Upload to the condition on portal. Inspection Hold Sub Contractor (Mechanical) Upload to the condition on portal. Inspection Hold Inspection hold until change of contractor fee has been paid. NOTE: If you are unable to schedule your inspection, please contact the inspection desk at 252-2400. NOISE ORDINANCE: Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances 54-92(f) Construction Sound. NOISE LIMITATIONS are in effect at all times. Work permitted, RESIDENTIAL Areas – 6:30 AM to 7:00 PM Monday thru Saturday; NON-RESIDENTIAL Areas (more than 500 feet from Residential Area) 6:00AM to 8:00PM Monday thru Saturday. No Work on Sundays or Holidays. RADIOS, LOUDSPEAKERS, ETC. – Must not disturb peace, quiet and comfort of neighboring inhabitants. FREE CABLE LOCATIONS – Call 48 Hours prior to digging/FPL 434-1222/UTS 1-800-542-0088/PalmerCATV 783-0638 and all other applicable utilities. Per currently adopted building code ordinance, as it may be amended, all work must comply with all applicable laws, codes, ordinances, and any additional stipulations or conditions of this permit. This permit expires if work authorized by the permit is not commenced within six (6) months from the date of issuance of the permit. Additional fees for failing to obtain permits prior to the commencement of construction may be imposed. Permittee(s) further understands that any contractor that may be employed must be a licensed contractor and that the structure must not be used or occupied until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued. NOTICE: PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OF ASBESTOS PRODUCTS OR THE DEMOLITION OF A STRUCTURE, FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS REQUIRE THE PERMITTEE (EITHER THE OWNER OR CONTRACTOR) TO SUBMIT A NOTICE OF THE INTENDED WORK TO THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (DEP). FOR MORE INFORMATION, CONTACT DEP AT (239) 344-5600. NOTICE: In addition to the conditions of this permit, there may be additional restrictions applicable to this property that may be found in the public records of this county, and there may be additional permits required from other governmental entities such as water management districts, state agencies, or federal agencies. WARNING TO OWNER: YOUR FAILURE TO RECORD A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MAY RESULT IN YOUR PAYING TWICE FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO YOUR PROPERTY. A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MUST BE RECORDED AND POSTED ON THE JOB SITE BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION. IF YOU INTEND TO OBTAIN FINANCING, CONSULT WITH YOUR LENDER OR AN ATTORNEY BEFORE RECORDING YOUR NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. Page 272 of 590 CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY The described portion of the structure has been inspected for compliance with the requirements of the FBC 7th Edition 2020 for the occupancy and division of occupancy and the use for which the proposed occupancy is classified.For buildings and structures in flood hazard areas, documentation of the as-built lowest floor elevation has been provided and is retained in the records of the authority having jurisdiction. Note: A new certificate is required if the use of the building or premises is changed, or if alterations are made to the building or property described. A new certificate voids any certificate or prior date. Page 1 of 1 This Certificate is issued pursuant to the requirements of the Florida Building Code, certifying that at the time of issuance this structure was in compliance with the various ordinances of the County regulating building construction for use for the following: Permit Number: PRFH20220631317 Date Issued: October 03, 2024 Permitted Address: 824 98th AVE N, (Unit) , Naples Parcel: 62775920000 Owner Information:MORAN, CHRISTOPHER HAYDEN SLOSS 788 104TH AVE N NAPLES, FL 34108 Use & Occupancy: R-3 Design Occupant Load: Construction Type: Type VB (Unprotected)Automatic Sprinkler System: Building Official: Fred Clum Number of Electrical Meters: 1 Job Description: New SFR (ROW:PRROW20220631407) REV01- CHANGE OF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT & ROOF FROM SHINGLES TO TILE 824 98th AVE N, Unit, Naples, Single Family 4 bed/ 4 bath (4wc) Page 273 of 590 PRSPL2023010259101 COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PERMIT PERMIT #: PRSPL2023010259101 PERMIT TYPE: Pool DATE ISSUED: November 15, 2023 BUILDING CODE IN EFFECT: FBC 7th Edition 2020 w/ 2022 sup2 JOB ADDRESS: 824 98th AVE N, (Unit) , Naples FOLIO #: JOB DESCRIPTION: Installation of 16x32 pool with sunshelf and 5x8 spa, no niche color led lights, sand set paver deck, 3hp VS pump, 200' filter, salt generator, 135k btu heat pump, automation, 1.5hp blower, pool guard safety. Fence by others 824 98th AVE N, (Unit) , Naples OWNER INFORMATION: MORAN, CHRISTOPHER HAYDEN SLOSS 788 104TH AVE N NAPLES, FL 34108 AREA OF WORK (SQFT): 0 SETBACKS: FRONT: REAR: LEFT: RIGHT: FLOOD ZONE: AH SEWER: WATER: CONTRACTOR INFORMATION:CERTIFICATE #: EDGEWATER POOL AND SPA SERVICES, LLC 1076 INDUSTRIAL BLVD Naples, FL 34104 (239) 961-1432 LCC20210002491 Page 274 of 590 PRSPL2023010259101 INSPECTION JOB CARD To schedule inspections call 239-252-3726 or visit https://cvportal.colliercountyfl.gov/cityviewweb SETBACKS: FRONT:REAR:LEFT:RIGHT:SPECIAL:FLOOD ZONE: FZAH INSPECTION OUTCOME COMMENTS 700 - Pool Bonding 701 - Pool Final 704 - Pool Shell Reinforcement (NOTE:Survey may be required within 10 days) 706 - Pool Plumbing Rough Pentair Intelliflo 3.0 hp VS Pump W/ 3 In. Brach drain 707 - Pool Plumbing Final 708 - Pool Electrical Final 709 - Pool Pipe Pressure Test 711 - Pool Footings 714 - Pool Equipotential Bonding Grid OPEN CONDITIONS Condition Type:Condition Description: Informational NOTICE OF CLEARING RESTRICTIONS: The issuance of a building permit for a single-family dwelling allows up to one (1) acre of native vegetation to be cleared. Clearing more than one (1) acre may be allowed for accessory structures and requires a separate Vegetation Removal Permit. Properties located in the following zoning district overlays may not be allowed to clear one (1) acre: Rural Fringe Mixed Use District (RFMU), Big Cypress Area of Concern (ACSC), and Special Treatment Overlay (ST). There may be additional restrictions related to clearing native vegetation and impacts to wetlands or protected species found on the property. State and Federal agency permits may be required. Contact the Growth Management Department?s Environmental Services at (239) 252-2400 for additional information. Informational Expired permit(s) have been identified with this address. An expired permit(s) may impact your ability to apply for a permit(s) at a future date and/or impact the sale of your property. PRBD20210943553 Informational FEMA - All equipment must be above flood plus one foot. Any materials used below flood level must comply with FEMA regulations Informational A Survey is required and must verify that improvement(s) meet setbacks, easements, and elevation requirements per Chapter 62, Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. Throughout the duration of the permit, please review the survey conditions for when to upload the survey. CO Hold At the time of permit application, the permitted structure is in the special flood hazard area. An Under Construction Elevation Certificate is required within 10 days of passing a 103 or 133 inspection of slab or other foundation system. Prior to obtaining County approval of the Under Construction Elevation Certificate, the Page 275 of 590 PRSPL2023010259101 permit holder?s construction activities are at his/her own risk. Under Construction Elevation Certificates must verify the slab meets minimum elevations per the Florida Building Code and Chapter 62, Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances (e.g., BFE +1 or 18? above the crown of the road, whichever is higher, and the elevation established by the SFWMD permit). CO Hold > Elevation Certificate Inspection Hold Sub Contractor (Electrical) Upload to the condition on portal. NOTE: If you are unable to schedule your inspection, please contact the inspection desk at 252-2400. NOISE ORDINANCE: Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances 54-92(f) Construction Sound. NOISE LIMITATIONS are in effect at all times. Work permitted, RESIDENTIAL Areas – 6:30 AM to 7:00 PM Monday thru Saturday; NON-RESIDENTIAL Areas (more than 500 feet from Residential Area) 6:00AM to 8:00PM Monday thru Saturday. No Work on Sundays or Holidays. RADIOS, LOUDSPEAKERS, ETC. – Must not disturb peace, quiet and comfort of neighboring inhabitants. FREE CABLE LOCATIONS – Call 48 Hours prior to digging/FPL 434-1222/UTS 1-800-542-0088/PalmerCATV 783-0638 and all other applicable utilities. Per currently adopted building code ordinance, as it may be amended, all work must comply with all applicable laws, codes, ordinances, and any additional stipulations or conditions of this permit. This permit expires if work authorized by the permit is not commenced within six (6) months from the date of issuance of the permit. Additional fees for failing to obtain permits prior to the commencement of construction may be imposed. Permittee(s) further understands that any contractor that may be employed must be a licensed contractor and that the structure must not be used or occupied until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued. NOTICE: PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OF ASBESTOS PRODUCTS OR THE DEMOLITION OF A STRUCTURE, FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS REQUIRE THE PERMITTEE (EITHER THE OWNER OR CONTRACTOR) TO SUBMIT A NOTICE OF THE INTENDED WORK TO THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (DEP). FOR MORE INFORMATION, CONTACT DEP AT (239) 344-5600. NOTICE: In addition to the conditions of this permit, there may be additional restrictions applicable to this property that may be found in the public records of this county, and there may be additional permits required from other governmental entities such as water management districts, state agencies, or federal agencies. WARNING TO OWNER: YOUR FAILURE TO RECORD A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MAY RESULT IN YOUR PAYING TWICE FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO YOUR PROPERTY. A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MUST BE RECORDED AND POSTED ON THE JOB SITE BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION. IF YOU INTEND TO OBTAIN FINANCING, CONSULT WITH YOUR LENDER OR AN ATTORNEY BEFORE RECORDING YOUR NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. Page 276 of 590 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION The described portion of the structure has been inspected for compliance with the requirements of the FBC 7th Edition 2020 w/2022 sup2 for the occupancy and division of occupancy and the use for which the proposed occupancy is classified.For buildings and structures in flood hazard areas,documentation of the as-built lowest floor elevation has been provided and is retained in the records of the authority having jurisdiction.Note:A new certificate is required if the use of the building or premises is changed,or if alterations are made to the building or property described. A new certificate voids any certificate or prior date. Page 1 of 1 This Certificate is issued pursuant to the requirements of the Florida Building Code, certifying that at the time of issuance this structure was in compliance with the various ordinances of the County regulating building construction for use for the following: Per FBC section 111.5, a certificate of completion is proof that a structure or system is complete and for certain types of permits is released for use and may be connected to a utility system. This certificate does not grant authority to occupy a building, such as shell building, prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. Permit Number: PRSPL20230102591 Date Issued: October 03, 2024 Permitted Address: 824 98th AVE N, (Unit) , Naples Parcel: 62775920000 Owner Information: MORAN, CHRISTOPHER HAYDEN SLOSS 788 104TH AVE N NAPLES, FL 34108 Building Official: Fred Clum Job Description: Installation of 16x32 pool with sunshelf and 5x8 spa, no niche color led lights, sand set paver deck, 3hp VS pump, 200' filter, salt generator, 135k btu heat pump, automation, 1.5hp blower, pool guard safety. Fence by others REV01-Revision to stormwater plan 824 98th AVE N, (Unit) , Naples Number of Electrical Meters: Page 277 of 590 PRFH2022073181001 COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PERMIT PERMIT #: PRFH2022073181001 PERMIT TYPE: Building DATE ISSUED: August 22, 2022 BUILDING CODE IN EFFECT: FBC 7th Edition 2020 JOB ADDRESS: 828 98th AVE N, (Unit) , Naples FOLIO #: 62775940006 JOB DESCRIPTION: New Single Family Home PRROW20220731802 (ROW) 828 98th AVE N Lot 38 4 Bedrooms & 4 W.C. OWNER INFORMATION: MORAN, CHRISTOPHER MATTHEW MORAN 788 104TH AVE N NAPLES, FL 34108 AREA OF WORK (SQFT): 3504 SETBACKS: FRONT: 25' REAR: 20' P / 10' A LEFT: 7.5' RIGHT: 7.5' FLOOD ZONE: AH SEWER: Sewer WATER: New CONTRACTOR INFORMATION:CERTIFICATE #: SCHOLTEN CONSTRUCTION LLC 3940 RADIO RD. SUITE #104 NAPLES, FL 34104 (239) 434-7667 LCC20150001514 Page 278 of 590 PRFH2022073181001 INSPECTION JOB CARD To schedule inspections call 239-252-3726 or visit https://cvportal.colliercountyfl.gov/cityviewweb SETBACKS: FRONT:25'REAR:20' P / 10' A LEFT:7.5'RIGHT:7.5'SPECIAL:FLOOD ZONE: FZAH INSPECTION OUTCOME COMMENTS 111 - Dry-in/Flashing 115 - Building Final 134 - Roofing Final 154 - Soffit Coverings In progress Please do NOT complete Soffit installation prior to inspection. 203 - Sewer Tap 204 - Plumbing Final 301 - A/C Final 502 - Electrical Final 509 - TV/Telephone Final 801 - Site Drainage Type II Stormwater Plan, signed and sealed by a PE. DiazDidier 08/02/2022 3:11 PM 802 - Landscaping 810 - Exotic Vegetation Removal OPEN CONDITIONS Condition Type:Condition Description: CO Hold Waiting for Blower Door Test documentation. Upload to the condition on the portal. Per Plans Envelope Leakage no greater than 5.00 ACH50 CO Hold Waiting for Final Energy Calc Summary Sheet. Upload to the condition on the portal. Informational FEMA - All equipment must be above flood plus one foot. Any materials used below flood level must comply with FEMA regulations CO Hold A Spot Survey will be required within ten days of passing a 704 shell reinforcement or 103/133 inspection of slab. Prior to obtaining County approval of the Spot Survey, the permit holder?s construction activities are at his/her own risk. After 10 days an "Inspection HOLD" will be placed on this Permit for survey review. NOTE: A Spot Survey must verify slab meets setbacks and minimum elevation per Chapter 62, Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances, e.g., 18? above the crown of the road or the elevation established by the SFWMD permit. CO Hold Any required County impact fees will be due prior to issuance of a temporary or final Certificate of Occupancy CO Hold > Elevation Certificate Page 279 of 590 PRFH2022073181001 Flood zone AH 11 NAVD; prop FFE=12.6' NAVD; COR=10.37 NAVD; Garage LP 12.1' NAVD per Drainage Plan stamped 6/30/22 (Wunder); Garage meets BFE+1 foot at LP; CO Hold This building permit has a Type II stormwater management plan, signed and sealed by a registered Florida Professional Engineer as was reviewed by Development Review. Prior to scheduling the 801 inspection, please upload the signed and sealed stormwater certification letter to the condition in the portal. If you have further questions, please contact Engineering Services at 239-252-2417. CO Hold Please contact the Inspection/CO section at 239-252-2406 or email us at inspections@colliercountyfl.gov to have this condition resolved prior to paying CO fees. This will generate the Mandatory Curbside Solid Waste Collection fee based on the total permit fees due. CO Hold Please upload a Final Spot Survey demonstrating that the improvement listed on the permit meets the required setbacks, easements, and minimum elevation per Chapter 62, Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances as applicable. Informational Use the form located at https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/home/showdocument?id=105797&t=638403984984558370 to request Permit extensions, cancellations, and changes/withdrawals of Contractors, Subcontractors and Qualifiers. Instructions are provided with the form. Change/withdrawal of contractor does not apply to self-issued permits. Contact Building Permit Resolution Services at 239-252-2493 for assistance completing the form. Submit the form by clicking the Browse button below. Inspection Hold Notice of Commencement: Upload to the condition on the portal. Inspection Hold Sub Contractor (Roofing) Upload to the condition on portal. Inspection Hold Sub Contractor (Plumbing) Upload to the condition on portal. Inspection Hold Sub Contractor (Mechanical) Upload to the condition on portal. Inspection Hold Sub Contractor (Electrical) Upload to the condition on portal. Inspection Hold Inspection hold until change of contractor fee has been paid. NOTE: If you are unable to schedule your inspection, please contact the inspection desk at 252-2400. NOISE ORDINANCE: Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances 54-92(f) Construction Sound. NOISE LIMITATIONS are in effect at all times. Work permitted, RESIDENTIAL Areas – 6:30 AM to 7:00 PM Monday thru Saturday; NON-RESIDENTIAL Areas (more than 500 feet from Residential Area) 6:00AM to 8:00PM Monday thru Saturday. No Work on Sundays or Holidays. RADIOS, LOUDSPEAKERS, ETC. – Must not disturb peace, quiet and comfort of neighboring inhabitants. FREE CABLE LOCATIONS – Call 48 Hours prior to digging/FPL 434-1222/UTS 1-800-542-0088/PalmerCATV 783-0638 and all other applicable utilities. Per currently adopted building code ordinance, as it may be amended, all work must comply with all applicable laws, codes, ordinances, and any additional stipulations or conditions of this permit. This permit expires if work authorized by the permit is not commenced within six (6) months from the date of issuance of the permit. Additional fees for failing to obtain permits prior to the commencement of construction may be imposed. Permittee(s) further understands that any contractor that may be employed must be a licensed contractor and that the structure must not be used or occupied until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued. NOTICE: PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OF ASBESTOS PRODUCTS OR THE DEMOLITION OF A STRUCTURE, FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS REQUIRE THE PERMITTEE (EITHER THE OWNER OR CONTRACTOR) TO SUBMIT A NOTICE OF THE INTENDED WORK TO THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (DEP). FOR MORE INFORMATION, CONTACT DEP AT (239) 344-5600. NOTICE: In addition to the conditions of this permit, there may be additional restrictions applicable to this property that may be found in the public records of this county, and there may be additional permits required from other governmental entities such as water management districts, state agencies, or federal agencies. WARNING TO OWNER: YOUR FAILURE TO RECORD A NOTICE OF Page 280 of 590 PRFH2022073181001 COMMENCEMENT MAY RESULT IN YOUR PAYING TWICE FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO YOUR PROPERTY. A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MUST BE RECORDED AND POSTED ON THE JOB SITE BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION. IF YOU INTEND TO OBTAIN FINANCING, CONSULT WITH YOUR LENDER OR AN ATTORNEY BEFORE RECORDING YOUR NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. Page 281 of 590 Building Plan Review & Inspection Division CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY The described portion of the structure has been inspected for compliance with the requirements of the FBC 7th Edition 2020 for the occupancy and division of occupancy and the use for which the proposed occupancy is classified.For buildings and structures in flood hazard areas, documentation of the as-built lowest floor elevation has been provided and is retained in the records of the authority having jurisdiction. Note: A new certificate is required if the use of the building or premises is changed, or if alterations are made to the building or property described. A new certificate voids any certificate or prior date. Page 1 of 1 This Certificate is issued pursuant to the requirements of the Florida Building Code, certifying that at the time of issuance this structure was in compliance with the various ordinances of the County regulating building construction for use for the following: Permit Number: PRFH20220731810 Date Issued: August 02, 2024 Permitted Address: 828 98th AVE N, (Unit) , Naples Parcel: 62775940006 Owner Information:MORAN, CHRISTOPHER MATTHEW MORAN 788 104TH AVE N NAPLES, FL 34108 Use & Occupancy: R-3 Design Occupant Load: Construction Type: Type VB (Unprotected)Automatic Sprinkler System: Building Official: Fred Clum Number of Electrical Meters: 1 Job Description: New Single Family Home PRROW20220731802 (ROW) REV01-CHANGE TO UNDERLAYMENT MATERIAL AND FROM SHINGLE ROOF TO METAL ROOF 828 98th AVE N Lot 38 4 Bedrooms & 4 W.C. Page 282 of 590 PRSPL2023010259201 COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PERMIT PERMIT #: PRSPL2023010259201 PERMIT TYPE: Pool DATE ISSUED: March 13, 2023 BUILDING CODE IN EFFECT: FBC 7th Edition 2020 w/ 2022 sup2 JOB ADDRESS: 828 98th AVE N, (Unit) , Naples FOLIO #: JOB DESCRIPTION: Install a 16x32 pool with sunshelf and a 5x8 spa. No niche color led lights. Sand set paver deck, 3hp VS pump, 200' filter, salt generator, 135k btu heat pump, automation, 1.5hp blower, pool guard safety. Fence by others {REF: PRFH20220731810} 828 98th AVE N, (Unit) , Naples OWNER INFORMATION: MORAN, CHRISTOPHER MATTHEW MORAN 788 104TH AVE N NAPLES, FL 34108 AREA OF WORK (SQFT): 0 SETBACKS: FRONT: REAR: 10? A LEFT: 7.5' RIGHT: 7.5' FLOOD ZONE: AH SEWER: WATER: CONTRACTOR INFORMATION:CERTIFICATE #: EDGEWATER POOL AND SPA SERVICES, LLC 1076 INDUSTRIAL BLVD Naples, FL 34104 (239) 961-1432 LCC20210002491 Page 283 of 590 PRSPL2023010259201 INSPECTION JOB CARD To schedule inspections call 239-252-3726 or visit https://cvportal.colliercountyfl.gov/cityviewweb SETBACKS: FRONT:REAR:10? A LEFT:7.5'RIGHT:7.5'SPECIAL:FLOOD ZONE: FZAH INSPECTION OUTCOME COMMENTS 700 - Pool Bonding 701 - Pool Final 704 - Pool Shell Reinforcement (NOTE:Survey may be required within 10 days) 706 - Pool Plumbing Rough Pentair Intelliflo 3.0 Hp Vs pump W/ 3 In Branch drain 707 - Pool Plumbing Final 708 - Pool Electrical Final 709 - Pool Pipe Pressure Test 711 - Pool Footings 714 - Pool Equipotential Bonding Grid OPEN CONDITIONS Condition Type:Condition Description: Informational NOTICE OF CLEARING RESTRICTIONS: The issuance of a building permit for a single-family dwelling allows up to one (1) acre of native vegetation to be cleared. Clearing more than one (1) acre may be allowed for accessory structures and requires a separate Vegetation Removal Permit. Properties located in the following zoning district overlays may not be allowed to clear one (1) acre: Rural Fringe Mixed Use District (RFMU), Big Cypress Area of Concern (ACSC), and Special Treatment Overlay (ST). There may be additional restrictions related to clearing native vegetation and impacts to wetlands or protected species found on the property. State and Federal agency permits may be required. Contact the Growth Management Department?s Environmental Services at (239) 252-2400 for additional information. Inspection Hold Notice of Commencement: Upload to the condition on the portal. Informational FEMA - All equipment must be above flood plus one foot. Any materials used below flood level must comply with FEMA regulations Informational A Survey is required and must verify that improvement(s) meet setbacks, easements, and elevation requirements per Chapter 62, Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. Throughout the duration of the permit, please review the survey conditions for when to upload the survey. CO Hold At the time of permit application, the permitted structure is in the special flood hazard area. An Under Construction Elevation Certificate is required within 10 days of passing a 103 or 133 inspection of slab or other foundation system. Prior to obtaining County approval of the Under Construction Elevation Certificate, the Page 284 of 590 PRSPL2023010259201 permit holder?s construction activities are at his/her own risk. Under Construction Elevation Certificates must verify the slab meets minimum elevations per the Florida Building Code and Chapter 62, Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances (e.g., BFE +1 or 18? above the crown of the road, whichever is higher, and the elevation established by the SFWMD permit). CO Hold > Elevation Certificate AH 11.0 NAVD FLOOD ZONE, ALL EQUIPMENT MUST BE ABOVE BFE +1 Ft. Inspection Hold Sub Contractor (Electrical) Upload to the condition on portal. NOTE: If you are unable to schedule your inspection, please contact the inspection desk at 252-2400. NOISE ORDINANCE: Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances 54-92(f) Construction Sound. NOISE LIMITATIONS are in effect at all times. Work permitted, RESIDENTIAL Areas – 6:30 AM to 7:00 PM Monday thru Saturday; NON-RESIDENTIAL Areas (more than 500 feet from Residential Area) 6:00AM to 8:00PM Monday thru Saturday. No Work on Sundays or Holidays. RADIOS, LOUDSPEAKERS, ETC. – Must not disturb peace, quiet and comfort of neighboring inhabitants. FREE CABLE LOCATIONS – Call 48 Hours prior to digging/FPL 434-1222/UTS 1-800-542-0088/PalmerCATV 783-0638 and all other applicable utilities. Per currently adopted building code ordinance, as it may be amended, all work must comply with all applicable laws, codes, ordinances, and any additional stipulations or conditions of this permit. This permit expires if work authorized by the permit is not commenced within six (6) months from the date of issuance of the permit. Additional fees for failing to obtain permits prior to the commencement of construction may be imposed. Permittee(s) further understands that any contractor that may be employed must be a licensed contractor and that the structure must not be used or occupied until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued. NOTICE: PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OF ASBESTOS PRODUCTS OR THE DEMOLITION OF A STRUCTURE, FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS REQUIRE THE PERMITTEE (EITHER THE OWNER OR CONTRACTOR) TO SUBMIT A NOTICE OF THE INTENDED WORK TO THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (DEP). FOR MORE INFORMATION, CONTACT DEP AT (239) 344-5600. NOTICE: In addition to the conditions of this permit, there may be additional restrictions applicable to this property that may be found in the public records of this county, and there may be additional permits required from other governmental entities such as water management districts, state agencies, or federal agencies. WARNING TO OWNER: YOUR FAILURE TO RECORD A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MAY RESULT IN YOUR PAYING TWICE FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO YOUR PROPERTY. A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MUST BE RECORDED AND POSTED ON THE JOB SITE BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION. IF YOU INTEND TO OBTAIN FINANCING, CONSULT WITH YOUR LENDER OR AN ATTORNEY BEFORE RECORDING YOUR NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. Page 285 of 590 Building Plan Review & Inspection Division CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION The described portion of the structure has been inspected for compliance with the requirements of the FBC 7th Edition 2020 w/2022 sup2 for the occupancy and division of occupancy and the use for which the proposed occupancy is classified.For buildings and structures in flood hazard areas,documentation of the as-built lowest floor elevation has been provided and is retained in the records of the authority having jurisdiction.Note:A new certificate is required if the use of the building or premises is changed,or if alterations are made to the building or property described. A new certificate voids any certificate or prior date. Page 1 of 1 This Certificate is issued pursuant to the requirements of the Florida Building Code, certifying that at the time of issuance this structure was in compliance with the various ordinances of the County regulating building construction for use for the following: Per FBC section 111.5, a certificate of completion is proof that a structure or system is complete and for certain types of permits is released for use and may be connected to a utility system. This certificate does not grant authority to occupy a building, such as shell building, prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. Permit Number: PRSPL20230102592 Date Issued: August 02, 2024 Permitted Address: 828 98th AVE N, (Unit) , Naples Parcel: 62775940006 Owner Information: MORAN, CHRISTOPHER MATTHEW MORAN 788 104TH AVE N NAPLES, FL 34108 Building Official: Fred Clum Job Description: Install a 16x32 pool with sunshelf and a 5x8 spa. No niche color led lights. Sand set paver deck, 3hp VS pump, 200' filter, salt generator, 135k btu heat pump, automation, 1.5hp blower, pool guard safety. Fence by others REV01-Revision to stormwater plan {REF: PRFH20220731810} 828 98th AVE N, (Unit) , Naples Number of Electrical Meters: Page 286 of 590 PRFW2024030974801 COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PERMIT PERMIT #: PRFW2024030974801 PERMIT TYPE: Fence DATE ISSUED: May 22, 2024 BUILDING CODE IN EFFECT: FBC 8th Edition 2023 JOB ADDRESS: 828 98th AVE N, (Unit) , Naples FOLIO #: JOB DESCRIPTION: Add 2' retaining wall around east and south of property entirely on owner's lot ( PRFW20240206460 Add a 4' fence around perimeter of pool. Will be 18" minimum off of pool and attached to pavers. ) 828 98th AVE N, (Unit) , Naples OWNER INFORMATION: MORAN, CHRISTOPHER MATTHEW MORAN 100 1ST AVE N #3706 ST PETERSBURG, FL 33701 AREA OF WORK (SQFT): 0 SETBACKS: FRONT: REAR: LEFT: RIGHT: FLOOD ZONE: AE SEWER: WATER: CONTRACTOR INFORMATION:CERTIFICATE #: Page 287 of 590 PRFW2024030974801 INSPECTION JOB CARD To schedule inspections call 239-252-3726 or visit https://cvportal.colliercountyfl.gov/cityviewweb SETBACKS: FRONT:REAR:LEFT:RIGHT:SPECIAL:FLOOD ZONE: FZAE INSPECTION OUTCOME COMMENTS 115 - Building Final 161 - Fence Footing 162 - Fence Fill Cell OPEN CONDITIONS Condition Type:Condition Description: Informational NOTICE OF CLEARING RESTRICTIONS: The issuance of a building permit for a single-family dwelling allows up to one (1) acre of native vegetation to be cleared. Clearing more than one (1) acre may be allowed for accessory structures and requires a separate Vegetation Removal Permit. Properties located in the following zoning district overlays may not be allowed to clear one (1) acre: Rural Fringe Mixed Use District (RFMU), Big Cypress Area of Concern (ACSC), and Special Treatment Overlay (ST). There may be additional restrictions related to clearing native vegetation and impacts to wetlands or protected species found on the property. State and Federal agency permits may be required. Contact the Growth Management Department?s Environmental Services at (239) 252-2400 for additional information. Informational Use the form located at https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/home/showdocument?id=105797&t=638403984984558370 to request Permit extensions, cancellations, and changes/withdrawals of Contractors, Subcontractors and Qualifiers. Instructions are provided with the form. Right-of-Way (ROW) and Well permits may only use this process for cancellations. Change/withdrawal of contractor does not apply to self-issued permits. Contact Building Permit Resolution Services at 239-252-2493 for assistance completing the form. Submit the form by clicking the Browse button below. NOTE: If you are unable to schedule your inspection, please contact the inspection desk at 252-2400. NOISE ORDINANCE: Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances 54-92(f) Construction Sound. NOISE LIMITATIONS are in effect at all times. Work permitted, RESIDENTIAL Areas – 6:30 AM to 7:00 PM Monday thru Saturday; NON-RESIDENTIAL Areas (more than 500 feet from Residential Area) 6:00AM to 8:00PM Monday thru Saturday. No Work on Sundays or Holidays. RADIOS, LOUDSPEAKERS, ETC. – Must not disturb peace, quiet and comfort of neighboring inhabitants. FREE CABLE LOCATIONS – Call 48 Hours prior to digging/FPL 434-1222/UTS 1-800-542-0088/PalmerCATV 783-0638 and all other applicable utilities. Per currently adopted building code ordinance, as it may be amended, all work must comply with all applicable laws, codes, ordinances, and any additional stipulations or conditions of this permit. This permit expires if work authorized by the permit is not commenced within six (6) months from the date of issuance of the permit. Additional fees for failing to obtain permits prior to the commencement of construction may be imposed. Permittee(s) further understands that any contractor that may be employed must be a licensed contractor and that the structure must not be used or occupied until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued. NOTICE: PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OF ASBESTOS PRODUCTS OR THE DEMOLITION OF A STRUCTURE, FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS REQUIRE THE PERMITTEE (EITHER THE OWNER OR CONTRACTOR) TO SUBMIT A NOTICE OF THE INTENDED WORK TO THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (DEP). FOR MORE INFORMATION, CONTACT DEP AT (239) 344-5600. NOTICE: In addition to the conditions of this permit, there may be additional restrictions applicable to this property that may be Page 288 of 590 PRFW2024030974801 found in the public records of this county, and there may be additional permits required from other governmental entities such as water management districts, state agencies, or federal agencies. WARNING TO OWNER: YOUR FAILURE TO RECORD A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MAY RESULT IN YOUR PAYING TWICE FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO YOUR PROPERTY. A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MUST BE RECORDED AND POSTED ON THE JOB SITE BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION. IF YOU INTEND TO OBTAIN FINANCING, CONSULT WITH YOUR LENDER OR AN ATTORNEY BEFORE RECORDING YOUR NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. Page 289 of 590 Building Plan Review & Inspection Division CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION The described portion of the structure has been inspected for compliance with the requirements of the FBC 8th Edition 2023 for the occupancy and division of occupancy and the use for which the proposed occupancy is classified.For buildings and structures in flood hazard areas,documentation of the as-built lowest floor elevation has been provided and is retained in the records of the authority having jurisdiction.Note:A new certificate is required if the use of the building or premises is changed,or if alterations are made to the building or property described. A new certificate voids any certificate or prior date. Page 1 of 1 This Certificate is issued pursuant to the requirements of the Florida Building Code, certifying that at the time of issuance this structure was in compliance with the various ordinances of the County regulating building construction for use for the following: Per FBC section 111.5, a certificate of completion is proof that a structure or system is complete and for certain types of permits is released for use and may be connected to a utility system. This certificate does not grant authority to occupy a building, such as shell building, prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. Permit Number: PRFW20240309748 Date Issued: July 19, 2024 Permitted Address: 828 98th AVE N, (Unit) , Naples Parcel: 62775940006 Owner Information: MORAN, CHRISTOPHER MATTHEW MORAN 100 1ST AVE N #3706 ST PETERSBURG, FL 33701 Building Official: Fred Clum Job Description: Add 2' retaining wall around east and south of property entirely on owner's lot ( PRFW20240206460 Add a 4' fence around perimeter of pool. Will be 18" minimum off of pool and attached to pavers. ) 828 98th AVE N, (Unit) , Naples Number of Electrical Meters: Page 290 of 590 PRFW2024030975001 COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PERMIT PERMIT #: PRFW2024030975001 PERMIT TYPE: Fence DATE ISSUED: May 22, 2024 BUILDING CODE IN EFFECT: FBC 8th Edition 2023 JOB ADDRESS: 824 98th AVE N, (Unit) , Naples FOLIO #: JOB DESCRIPTION: Add 2' retaining wall along west and south sides of property to maintain yard elevation. ( HOUSE-PRFH20220631317) ( NOT FOR POOL PROTECTION ) 824 98th AVE N, (Unit) , Naples OWNER INFORMATION: MORAN, CHRISTOPHER HAYDEN SLOSS 100 1ST AVE N #3706 ST PETERSBURG, FL 33701 AREA OF WORK (SQFT): 0 SETBACKS: FRONT: REAR: LEFT: RIGHT: FLOOD ZONE: AE SEWER: WATER: CONTRACTOR INFORMATION:CERTIFICATE #: Page 291 of 590 PRFW2024030975001 INSPECTION JOB CARD To schedule inspections call 239-252-3726 or visit https://cvportal.colliercountyfl.gov/cityviewweb SETBACKS: FRONT:REAR:LEFT:RIGHT:SPECIAL:FLOOD ZONE: FZAE INSPECTION OUTCOME COMMENTS 100 - Footings 115 - Building Final 119 - Fill Cells OPEN CONDITIONS Condition Type:Condition Description: Informational NOTICE OF CLEARING RESTRICTIONS: The issuance of a building permit for a single-family dwelling allows up to one (1) acre of native vegetation to be cleared. Clearing more than one (1) acre may be allowed for accessory structures and requires a separate Vegetation Removal Permit. Properties located in the following zoning district overlays may not be allowed to clear one (1) acre: Rural Fringe Mixed Use District (RFMU), Big Cypress Area of Concern (ACSC), and Special Treatment Overlay (ST). There may be additional restrictions related to clearing native vegetation and impacts to wetlands or protected species found on the property. State and Federal agency permits may be required. Contact the Growth Management Department?s Environmental Services at (239) 252-2400 for additional information. Informational Use the form located at https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/home/showdocument?id=105797&t=638403984984558370 to request Permit extensions, cancellations, and changes/withdrawals of Contractors, Subcontractors and Qualifiers. Instructions are provided with the form. Right-of-Way (ROW) and Well permits may only use this process for cancellations. Change/withdrawal of contractor does not apply to self-issued permits. Contact Building Permit Resolution Services at 239-252-2493 for assistance completing the form. Submit the form by clicking the Browse button below. Informational Expired permit(s) have been identified with this property. An expired permit(s) may impact your ability to apply for a permit(s) at a future date and/or impact the sale of your property. REF-PRBD20210943553 NOTE: If you are unable to schedule your inspection, please contact the inspection desk at 252-2400. NOISE ORDINANCE: Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances 54-92(f) Construction Sound. NOISE LIMITATIONS are in effect at all times. Work permitted, RESIDENTIAL Areas – 6:30 AM to 7:00 PM Monday thru Saturday; NON-RESIDENTIAL Areas (more than 500 feet from Residential Area) 6:00AM to 8:00PM Monday thru Saturday. No Work on Sundays or Holidays. RADIOS, LOUDSPEAKERS, ETC. – Must not disturb peace, quiet and comfort of neighboring inhabitants. FREE CABLE LOCATIONS – Call 48 Hours prior to digging/FPL 434-1222/UTS 1-800-542-0088/PalmerCATV 783-0638 and all other applicable utilities. Per currently adopted building code ordinance, as it may be amended, all work must comply with all applicable laws, codes, ordinances, and any additional stipulations or conditions of this permit. This permit expires if work authorized by the permit is not commenced within six (6) months from the date of issuance of the permit. Additional fees for failing to obtain permits prior to the commencement of construction may be imposed. Permittee(s) further understands that any contractor that may be employed must be a licensed contractor and that the structure must not be used or occupied until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued. NOTICE: PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OF ASBESTOS PRODUCTS OR THE DEMOLITION OF A STRUCTURE, FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS REQUIRE THE PERMITTEE (EITHER THE OWNER OR CONTRACTOR) TO SUBMIT A NOTICE OF THE INTENDED WORK TO THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (DEP). FOR MORE INFORMATION, CONTACT DEP AT (239) 344-5600. Page 292 of 590 PRFW2024030975001 NOTICE: In addition to the conditions of this permit, there may be additional restrictions applicable to this property that may be found in the public records of this county, and there may be additional permits required from other governmental entities such as water management districts, state agencies, or federal agencies. WARNING TO OWNER: YOUR FAILURE TO RECORD A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MAY RESULT IN YOUR PAYING TWICE FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO YOUR PROPERTY. A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MUST BE RECORDED AND POSTED ON THE JOB SITE BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION. IF YOU INTEND TO OBTAIN FINANCING, CONSULT WITH YOUR LENDER OR AN ATTORNEY BEFORE RECORDING YOUR NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. Page 293 of 590 Building Plan Review & Inspection Division CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION The described portion of the structure has been inspected for compliance with the requirements of the FBC 8th Edition 2023 for the occupancy and division of occupancy and the use for which the proposed occupancy is classified.For buildings and structures in flood hazard areas,documentation of the as-built lowest floor elevation has been provided and is retained in the records of the authority having jurisdiction.Note:A new certificate is required if the use of the building or premises is changed,or if alterations are made to the building or property described. A new certificate voids any certificate or prior date. Page 1 of 1 This Certificate is issued pursuant to the requirements of the Florida Building Code, certifying that at the time of issuance this structure was in compliance with the various ordinances of the County regulating building construction for use for the following: Per FBC section 111.5, a certificate of completion is proof that a structure or system is complete and for certain types of permits is released for use and may be connected to a utility system. This certificate does not grant authority to occupy a building, such as shell building, prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. Permit Number: PRFW20240309750 Date Issued: July 19, 2024 Permitted Address: 824 98th AVE N, (Unit) , Naples Parcel: 62775920000 Owner Information: MORAN, CHRISTOPHER HAYDEN SLOSS 100 1ST AVE N #3706 ST PETERSBURG, FL 33701 Building Official: Fred Clum Job Description: Add 2' retaining wall along west and south sides of property to maintain yard elevation. ( HOUSE-PRFH20220631317) ( NOT FOR POOL PROTECTION ) 824 98th AVE N, (Unit) , Naples Number of Electrical Meters: Page 294 of 590 Info@FloridaMarineConsulting.com • 239-412-3247 • Naples, FL June 12, 2024 RE: 824 & 828 98th Ave – Retaining Wall Permit #: PRFW20240309750 & PRFW20240309748 Collier County Inspections #: 100 – Footings, 119 – Fill Cells, 115 – Building Final To Whom it May Concern, I, Julien Devisse, have inspected the retaining walls on June 6, 2024, for these homes as well as pictures from the owner showing the footers, rebar, block and poured concrete and certify the integrity of these walls. Based on the site inspection and photos, I determined that the retaining walls were constructed per 2023 Florida Building code and local ordinances. Below is a description and detail as to how the walls are constructed: • 3-courses stem-wall with CMU block. • Footer was installed with a 16’’ wide by 8’’ thick footer with (2) #5 rebar continuous. • Dowels are every 4’ on center using # 5 rebar with a 10’’ hook. Vertical dowels tied at top course, running (1) #5 rebar horizontal continuous. • There are (2) #5 corner bars at 30’’x 30’’at each 90-degree angle in footer. Top course of Stem wall also has (1) corner bar at each 90-degree angle. • All ceils were ﬁlled full with 3,000 psi pump mix. • Each house will have approximately 168 linear feet of retaining wall After performing a site visit and reviewing the construction the retaining walls, I certify that the retaining walls were constructed in accordance with 2023 Florida Building Code. I agree to indemnify and hold harmless the County for the construction of the stem wall. Regards, Julien Devisse, P.E. FMEC Page 295 of 590 See reverse for more information PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE 824 & 828 98th AVE (VA) Petition Type: Variance Petition No.: PL20240001659 Planner Name: Sean Sammon Phone: (239) 252-8422 Hearing Examiner: Date: 12/12/2024 Time: 01:00 PM Location: GMCD Conference Room 609/610 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr, Naples, FL 34104 This is to advise you of an upcoming public hearing because you may have interest in the proceedings, or you own property located near the vicinity of the following property. For more information, or to register to participate remotely: https://bit.ly/Public__Hearings *Remote participation is provided as a courtesy and is at the user’s risk. The County is not responsible for technical issues For difficulties registering please call Ailyn Padron at (239) 252-5187 or email to ailyn.padron@CollierCountyFL.Gov. Meeting information: Individual speakers may be limited to five (5) minutes on any item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the agenda packets must submit materials a minimum of ten (10) days prior to the respective public hearing, to the county staff member noted above. All material used in presentations before the Hearing Examiner will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Hearing Examiner will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Zoning Division, located at 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL 34104, (239) 252- 2400, at least two (2) days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available upon request. This petition and other pertinent information related to this petition is kept on file and may be reviewed at the Growth Management Community Development Department building located at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104. Page 296 of 590 Hearing Examiner to consider the following: PETITION NO. PL20240001659 VA – REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE FROM LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 5.03.02.C.2.B TO INCREASE THE REQUIRED RMF- 6 ZONED FENCE HEIGHT FROM 6 FEET TO 8 FEET ON THE WEST AND EAST SIDE PROPERTY LINES AND THE SOUTH REAR PROPERTY LINE ON APPROXIMATELY 0.38 ACRES LOCATED AT 824 AND 828 98TH AVE NORTH, ALSO KNOWN AS LOTS 37, 38 AND PART OF LOT 39, BLOCK 64 OF THE NAPLES PARK UNIT 5 SUBDIVISION IN SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. Page 297 of 590 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Hearing Examiner (HEX) at 1:00 P.M., December 12, 2024, in the Hearing Examiner’s meeting room, at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Room 609/610, Naples FL 34104, to consider: PETITION NO. PL20240001659 VA – REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE FROM LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 5.03.02.C.2.B TO INCREASE THE REQUIRED RMF- 6 ZONED FENCE HEIGHT FROM 6 FEET TO 8 FEET ON THE WEST AND EAST SIDE PROPERTY LINES AND THE SOUTH REAR PROPERTY LINE ON APPROXIMATELY 0.38 ACRES LOCATED AT 824 AND 828 98TH AVE NORTH, ALSO KNOWN AS LOTS 37, 38 AND PART OF LOT 39, BLOCK 64 OF THE NAPLES PARK UNIT 5 SUBDIVISION IN SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. All materials used in presentation before the Hearing Examiner will become a permanent part of the record. Page 298 of 590 Copies of staff report are available one (1) week prior to the hearing. The file can be reviewed at the Collier County Growth Management Community Development Department, Zoning Division, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL 34104. As to any petition upon which the Hearing Examiner takes action, an aggrieved petitioner may appeal such final action. Such appeal shall be filed per Section 2-88 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances within 30 days of the decision by the Hearing Examiner. An aggrieved non-party may appeal a decision by the Hearing Examiner to the Circuit Court of Collier County within 30 days of the decision. In the event that the petition has been approved by the Hearing Examiner, the applicant shall be advised that he/she proceeds with construction at his/her own risk during this 30-day period. Any construction work completed ahead of the approval authorization shall be at their own risk. As part of an ongoing initiative to encourage public involvement, the public will have the opportunity to provide public comments remotely, as well as in person, during this proceeding. Individuals who would like to participate remotely should register through the link provided within the specific event/meeting entry on the Calendar of Events on the County website at www.colliercountyfl.gov/our-county/visitors/calendar- of-events after the agenda is posted on the County website. Registration should be done i n advance of the public meeting, or any deadline specified within the public meeting notice. Individuals who register will receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how they can participate remotely in this meeting. Remote participation is provided as a courtesy and is at the user’s risk. The County is not responsible for technical issues. For additional information about the meeting, please call Ray Bellows at 252-2463 or email to Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Zoning Division located at 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr, Naples, Florida 34104, (239) 252- 2400, at least two (2) days prior to the meeting. Andrew W. J. Dickman, Esq., AICP Chief Hearing Examiner Collier County, Florida Page 299 of 590 Page 300 of 590 Page 301 of 590 Page 302 of 590 Page 303 of 590 December 3, 2024 RE: 824&828 Perimeter Fence To whomever it may concern, I am a neighbor bordering the back yard area of Mr. Moran's new residence at 824&828 98th Ave N. Naples, FL 34108. I am in favor of Mr. Moran building an 8'fence in the back of his yard to provide both of us privacy when using our outdoor space. Due to Mr. Moran increasing his yard elevation by 2', a 6'fence would not provide that privacy between our adjoining back yards. Thank you, Signature Erig WilKinson Print name g55 97A,4v ►\ . NJapILj. , FL, 3L1i0 3G December 3, 2024 RE: 824&828 Perimeter Fence To whomever it may concern, I am a neighbor bordering the back yard area of Mr. Moran's new residence at 824&828 98th Ave N. Naples, FL 34108. I am in favor of Mr. Moran building an 8'fence in the back of his yard to provide both of us privacy when using our outdoor space. Due to Mr. Moran increasing his yard elevation by 2', a 6'fence would not provide that privacy between our adjoining back yards. Thank you, Jason Moore, 829 97th, N. Naples, FL 34108 December 3, 2024 RE: 824&828 Perimeter Fence To whomever it may concern, I am a neighbor bordering the back yard area of Mr. Moran's new residence at 824&828 98th Ave N. Naples, FL 34108. I am in favor of Mr. Moran building an 8'fence in the back of his yard to provide both of us privacy when using our outdoor space. Due to Mr. Moran increasing his yard elevation by 2', a 6'fence would not provide that privacy between our adjoining backyards. Thank you, kW) L Signature lArco,, \C r- -i )iV. Print name )-c q� AV( N N . N cirit s , Fi, 3`f l 08 December 3, 2024 RE: 824&828 Perimeter Fence To whomever it may concern, We are the neighbors to the east side of 828 98`h Ave N. Naples, FL 34108.We have discussed at length with Mr. Moran about building a 6'fence on top of his 2'elevated yard.We are in favor of Mr. Moran building this 6'fence and excited for the privacy that this will provide for us. Due to the new elevations, a 4'fence will not provide that privacy. Thank you, Signature Signature 7a � ,? - "� , �� Print name L ,- 1--2. C' ' Print name g a s 181i1 74vc N k ; , E gz-t i o w December 7, 2024 Hex Petition Hearing Request VA-PL20240001659 824/828 98th Avenue N. Naples, FL 34108 I unfortunately will be traveling out of the country and unable to be present at the petition hearing on December 12, 2024. Please accept this letter to appoint my business partner Alister Munro to represent these properties on the variance request. I will attempt to join via zoom if possible from my hotel. Thank you, ) , Chris Moran • getee4qe GARY A. ROBERTS & ASSOCIATES, LLC A Limited Liability Company GARY A.ROBERTS,ESQ. TIFFANI N.BROWN,ESQ. December 9, 2024 Sent via certified mail and electronic mail to: Collier County Growth Management Community Development Planning& Zoning Division 2800 North Horseshow Drive Naples, Florida 34104 ailyn.padron@colliercounofi.gov Tracking No.: 9407 1118 9876 5452 0086 30 RE: Objection to Request for Variance Petition No. PL20240001659 Public Hearing Date: December 12, 2024 at 1:00 pm Dear Sir/Madam: Our law firm has been retained to represent Vadim Muchnik and Olga Muchnik (hereinafter "Clients") regarding the Public Hearing Notice (hereinafter "Hearing Notice") from Collier County Growth Management Community Development (hereinafter "The County") pertaining to an upcoming public hearing regarding your neighbor's, Christopher Moran (hereinafter "Mr. Moran") request for a variance to increase the fence height from 6 feet to 8 feet. Please direct future communications and any other related items regarding this matter to our attention. Our Clients whose property is located at 820 98th Avenue, Naples, Florida 34108 (hereinafter "Property") received the Hearing Notice regarding the upcoming public hearing scheduled to be held on December 12, 2024, at 1:00 pm regarding Mr. Moran's request for variance from Land Development Code Section 5.03.02.C.2b to increase the required RMF-6 zoned fence height from 6 feet to 8 feet on the west and east side property lines and the south rear property line on approximately 0.38 acres located at 824 and 828 98`l'Avenue North,Naples,Florida 34108 (hereinafter"Neighboring Property"). Unfortunately, our Clients will be unable to attend the hearing in person; however, our Clients respectfully submit this formal objection to the proposed variance and request that the application be denied for the following reasons: Blocking of Sunlight: The requested 8-foot fence would significantly block the natural sunlight that currently reaches our Clients'property. This obstruction would negatively affect Gary A.Roberts&Associates,LLC 130 Salem Court • Tallahassee,Florida 32301 •Telephone: 850-513-0505 • Fax: 850-513-0318 Page 1 of 2 our Clients' enjoyment of their property, particularly in terms of lighting and the overall atmosphere of their home. Aesthetic Impact on a Modest Home: Our Clients' home is relatively modest in size and significantly lower in elevation compared to the neighboring property. An 8-foot fence would overpower the visual balance of the property and ruin the aesthetic integrity of our Clients home,which is of considerable importance to them. Encroachment Concerns: Should the fence height be reduced, our Clients request that any new structure be placed entirely within the property lines of the neighboring property. It is crucial to ensure that no portion of the fence encroaches upon our Clients property, as this would create a significant legal issue. Given these concerns, our Clients respectfully urge the Collier County Planning and Zoning Department to deny the requested variance for the increased fence height. We trust the Department will carefully consider the potential negative impacts on our Clients Property and the surrounding neighborhood. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter and request confirmation of the receipt of this letter. Please do not hesitate to reach out to our office at (850) 513-0505 or via e-mail at tiffani@garyrobertslaw.com and cc: tangi@garyrobertslaw.com, should you wish to further discuss. Sincerely, Isl r�arr�is. Tiffani Brown,Esq. Managing Attorney Gary A. Roberts &Associates, LLC Attorneys for Vadim and Olga Muchnik Vadim and Olga Muchnik I Demand Letter Page 2 of 2 12/12/2024 Item # 3.D ID# 2024-2150 PETITION NO. SV-PL20220006266 – Northtide Naples – 3120 North Road - Request for an after-the-fact sign variance from Land Development Code Section 5.06.04.F.1.a. to increase the allowable sign height from 15 feet to 17 feet and from Section 5.06.04.F.1.b to decrease the required setback from 10 feet to 2.7 feet to allow a pole sign for Northtide Naples RV Resort. The subject property is located at the southwest corner of Airport Road and North Road, at 3120 North Road, in Section 2, Township 50 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (Coordinator: John Kelly, Planner III) (Commissioner District 4) ATTACHMENTS: 1. Staff Report SV-PL20220006266 11212024 2. Attachment A - Site and Sign Plans 3. Attachment B - Survey 4. Attachment C - Applicant's Backup Page 304 of 590 SV-PL20220006266 – Northtide Naples RV Resort Page 1 of 7 November 21, 2024 MEMORANDUM TO: COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FROM: ZONING DIVISION-ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING: DECEMBER 12, 2024 SUBJECT: SV-PL20220006266, NORTHTIDE NAPLES RV RESORT–3120 NORTH ROAD ______________________________________________________________________________ PROPERTY OWNER/APPLICANT: AGENT: CPI Rock Creek Owner LLC Addie Mentry 1001 Pennsylvania Ave NW AMLU Consulting Washington, DC 20004 PO Box 332 Odessa, FL 33556 REQUESTED ACTION: The petitioner requests an after-the-fact Sign Variance from Land Development Code Section 5.06.04.F.1.a to increase the allowable sign height from 15 feet to 17 feet and from Section 5.06.04.F.1.b to decrease the required setback from 10 feet to 2.7 feet to allow a pole sign for Northtide Naples RV Resort. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is located at the southwest corner of Airport Road South North Road, at 3120 North Road, in Section 2, Township 50 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The subject 3.18-acre parcel is located within the Northtide Naples RV Resort, a 55+ community and recreational facility serving both full and part-time residents, located within a Travel Trailer Recreational Vehicle Campground (TTRVC) Zoning District. Signs within this district are allowed subject to LDC Section 5.06.00. The applicant seeks the subject sign variance to allow for the permitting and continued existence of a pole sign that was constructed without the benefit of a building permit. Specifically, the applicant seeks to reduce the required setback from 10 feet to 2.7 feet from the property line per LDC Section 5.06.04.F.1.b and to increase the allowable height from 15 feet to a maximum of 17 feet per LDC Section 5.06.04.F.1.a. Page 305 of 590 SV-PL20220006266 – Northtide Naples RV Resort Page 2 of 7 November 21, 2024 Page 306 of 590 SV-PL20220006266 – Northtide Naples RV Resort Page 3 of 7 November 21, 2024 Page 307 of 590 SV-PL20220006266 – Northtide Naples RV Resort Page 4 of 7 November 21, 2024 SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: North: North Road (Right-of-Way), then Naples Airport located in the City of Naples East: Preserve area located within a General Commercial (C-4) Zoning District South: Rock Creek, then preserve area within the Meridian Village MPUD West: Mobile Home Park located within a Travel Trailer Recreational Vehicle Campground (TTRVC) Zoning District Aerial Photo (Collier County GIS) Street View – Airport Rd N southbound at North Rd – Google Earth Page 308 of 590 SV-PL20220006266 – Northtide Naples RV Resort Page 5 of 7 November 21, 2024 Street View – Looking northwest from SB Airport Rd N– Google Earth GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: The subject property is located within the Urban Residential Subdistrict of the County’s Future Land Use Map (FLUM) of the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the GMP. The GMP does not address individual Variance requests but deals with the larger issue of the actual use. The property is presently used as a 55+ RV resort and recreational facility serving both full and part- time residents. The subject use is consistent with the FLUM of the GMP. As previously noted, the petitioner is requesting a Sign Variance (SV) to reduce the required setback and to increase the allowable height of a pole sign. The requested SV does not have any impact on this property's consistency with the County's GMP. STAFF ANALYSIS OF SIGN VARIANCE CRITERIA UNDER LDC SECTION 5.06.08 B.1: a. That special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure, or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district. The applicant’s agent states: “The unique characteristics of the entrance feature, the absence of an alternative visible location, and the necessity of maintaining visibility and safety for this senior living community create special conditions and circumstances for this variance request. The sign currently sits in a location that is part of an entrance feature. The entrance feature contains decorative boulders, a fountain, and the pole sign. The entrance feature was originally designed to be a prominent element of the identification for the RV park. The entrance feature was treated as a landmark for the site and has been used in conversation as a location indicator for the RV park. The existing pole sign is in place and refurbished with a new cabinet. The work was completed as such because, with the Page 309 of 590 SV-PL20220006266 – Northtide Naples RV Resort Page 6 of 7 November 21, 2024 decorative boulders and fountain, there is no other location that is visible for identification or wayfinding. Because of the location and configuration of the boulders and fountain, a new sign would have to be installed behind those features. This would ensure the setback would meet LDC requirements; however, it would render the sign to not be visible or safe to travelers driving East on North Rd or North on Airport Pulling Rd. Northtide Naples serves a senior community, and it is imperative for ensuring safety and accessibility that the sign has clear identification.” Zoning staff concurs and notes that at this location, Airport Road comprises three lanes in each direction, plus turn lanes, b. That literal interpretation of the provisions of the sign code would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district and would work an unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant. The applicant’s agent states: “The literal interpretation of the sign code would impose undue hardship on the applicant. Based on a visibility study of the RV park and neighboring sites, it appears Northtide has a site configuration and sign location that none of the adjacent properties have. Other sites in the corridor along Airport-Pulling Road have signs that are directly next to their entrance and there are few corner lots with signage. We believe utilizing the existing signage for alteration instead of removing and replacing the sign brings consistency to the corridor while providing essential identification.” Zoning staff concurs. The referenced Visibility study is contained in Attachment C. c. That the special conditions and circumstances which are peculiar to the land, structure or building do not result from the actions of the applicant. The applicant’s agent states: “We acknowledge that the request may technically be a result of the alteration of the sign. However, it is contended that the change of LDC requirements is not a direct result of the applicant’s actions. It is essential to recognize that the alteration took place to address the evolving needs of the community and to ensure public safety and accessibility. Strict enforcement of the code in this scenario would be unjust to the senior community that the site serves and could pose potential safety and traffic risks.” Zoning staff is unaware of an LDC change that would have impacted sign setbacks or sign heights at this location; however, the width of the adjoining right-of-way may have changed over time. d. That granting the Variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this sign code to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same zoning district. A Sign Variance, by definition, confers some dimensional relief from the zoning regulations specific to a site. LDC Section 5.06.08 allows others relief through the same Sign Variance process that has been undertaken by the applicant. Each Sign Variance project is reviewed individually based on its own merits. Staff believes the applicant has justified their need to engage in the Sign Variance process. e. That the Variance granted is the minimum relief that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building or structure. Page 310 of 590 SV-PL20220006266 – Northtide Naples RV Resort Page 7 of 7 November 21, 2024 The subject petition is for an after-the-fact sign variance. As the sign has already been constructed, the requested deviations are the minimum required to bring the existing sign into compliance with the LDC. f. That the granting of the Variance will be consistent with the general intent and purpose of the Collier County Sign Code and the Growth Management Plan, and will not be injurious to adjacent properties or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. Section 5.06.01.A. of the LDC states that the purpose and intent of the sign code is to provide minimum control of signs necessary to promote the health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of Collier County, Florida, by: 1. Lessening hazards to pedestrians and vehicular traffic; 2. Preserving property values; 3. Preventing unsightly and detrimental signs that detract from the aesthetic appeal of the county and lead to economic decline and blight; 4. Preventing signs from reaching such excessive size and numbers that they obscure one another to the detriment of the county; 5 Assuring good and attractive design that will strengthen the county's appearance and economic base, and; 6. Preserving the right of free speech and expression in the display of signs. Staff concurs that the subject Sign Variance request satisfies established criteria. This Sign Variance is consistent with the general intent and purpose of the LDC and GMP. LDC Section 10.03.06.F.2.a requires the agent for sign variance petitions send an “agent letter” to property owners and associations located within 150 feet of the area covered by the petition. The agent for this project sent said agent letter on or about November 14, 2024, as evidenced by a notarized affidavit and mailing information contained within Attachment C. CONCURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS: There are no concurrent land use applications under review at present. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Collier County Hearing Examiner render a Decision to approve Petition SV-PL20220006266 to reduce the required sign setback from 10 feet to 2.7 feet from the property line per LDC Section 5.06.04.F.1.b and to increase the allowable height from 15 feet to a maximum of 17 feet per LDC Section 5.06.04.F.1.a., at the subject location. Attachments: A. Sign Plan B. Pine Air Lakes CPUD, Ordinance 07-32 C. Applicant’s Application and Backup Materials Page 311 of 590 Approved as noted Approved NORTHTIDE NAPLES 3100 North Road Naples Collier County, FL 206972 02-24-2024 PROJECT: Account Manager: SITE ADDRESS Quote: Project Manager / Project Leader Alexis Barry XXX DRB Designer: Revision: No. Date Description 01 03-26-2024 09-25-2024 customer up-date DRB up-date DRB Approval: This Drawing and all reproductions thereof are the property of Creative Sign Designs and may not be reproduced, published, changed or used in any way without written consent Sheet: Date: 12801 Commodity Place Tampa, Florida 33626 Phone: 813-818-7100 Fax: 813-749-2311 www.creativesigndesigns.com 02 03 04 05 05 1 1 of 2 Scale: 1/2”=1’-0” New Pole Covers for Existing D/F Sign Fabricated two-part pole cover, 2”x 2” aluminum angle inner frame with sheet aluminum filler, painted to match existing wood posts. 7’-5”6’-6” 2'-2"2'-2" Proposed Updated Conditions 8’-2” 0’-8”0’-8”16'-9 3/8"9’-4 3/8”Page 312 of 590 Approved as noted Approved NORTHTIDE NAPLES 3100 North Road Naples Collier County, FL 206972 02-24-2024 PROJECT: Account Manager: SITE ADDRESS Quote: Project Manager / Project Leader Alexis Barry XXX DRB Designer: Revision: No. Date Description 01 03-26-2024 09-25-2024 customer up-date DRB up-date DRB Approval: This Drawing and all reproductions thereof are the property of Creative Sign Designs and may not be reproduced, published, changed or used in any way without written consent Sheet: Date: 12801 Commodity Place Tampa, Florida 33626 Phone: 813-818-7100 Fax: 813-749-2311 www.creativesigndesigns.com 02 03 04 05 05 2 2 of 216’-9 3/8”6’-6”7’-5’15’-0"Page 313 of 590 Page 314 of 590 Page 315 of 590 Page 316 of 590 Page 317 of 590 Page 318 of 590 Revised 5/18/2018 Provide to Agents G:\CDES Planning Services\Current\Zoning Staff Information\Job Aides or Help Guides HEARING PACKAGE CHECKLIST A. Backup provided by the County Planner The agent is responsible for all required data included in the digital file of information for the Hearing Examiner (Hex) or the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC). DO NOT ACCEPT DUPLICATES OF ANY DOCUMENTS. MAKE SURE ONLY THE LATEST, ACCEPTED/APPROVED COPY OF THE BELOW DOCUMENTATION. PLEASE CONFIRM THE DOCUMENTS ARE IN THE ORDER DESCRIBED IN “BACKUP PROVIDED BY APPLICANT.” Planner responsible for providing the County Attorney-drafted Ordinance for PUDs and placing in backup materials. AGENTS DO NOT INCLUDE THE PUD DOCUMENT – STAFF PROVIDES THIS TO THE COUNTY ATTORNEY WHEN THE ORDINANCE IS DRAFTED FOR A PUD. THE FINAL PUD ORDINANCE/RESOLUTION IS THE FIRST ITEM AFTER THE STAFF REPORT. [FOR HEX, THE REQUESTED LANGUAGE/ PROPOSED PLAN IS THE FIRST ITEM AFTER THE STAFF REPORT] B. Backup provided by Applicant: PLEASE PROVIDE THE DOCUMENTS IN THE ORDER DESCRIBED BELOW. DO NOT PROVIDE DUPLICATES OF ANY DOCUMENTS. PROVIDE ONLY THE LATEST, ACCEPTED/APPROVED COPY OF THE BELOW DOCUMENTATION. IF THE BACKUP PROVIDED BY APPLICANT IS IN DISARRAY-MEANING IT IS NOT IN THE PROPER ORDER AND/OR THE APPLICANT PROVIDES MULTIPLE DUPLICATES-THE APPLICANT COULD LOSE ITS HEARING DATE. _X__ Application, to include but not limited to the following: _ X__ Narrative of request _ X__ Property Information _ X__ Property Ownership Disclosure Form _ X__ Any other documents required by the specific petition type; such as a variance, a boat dock extension; PUD amendment, rezone request, etc. _ X__ Disclosure of Property Ownership Interest (if there is additional documentation aside from disclosure form) ____ Affidavit of Unified Control _ X__ Affidavit of Representation _ X__ Drawings (may include Cross-Section (for BDEs generally), proposed Boat Dock(s) with Water depth, location maps etc.) _ X__ NIM Information (Sign in sheet, notes, minutes and transcript/or summary)  Include 3 thumbnail drives of video and/or audio Agent Letter Info ____ Traffic Impact Study (TIS) ____ Environmental Data ____ Historical/Archeological Survey or Waiver ____ Utility Letter ____ Deviation Justifications Page 319 of 590 Revised 5/18/2018 Provide to Agents G:\CDES Planning Services\Current\Zoning Staff Information\Job Aides or Help Guides _X__ Boundary Survey _ X__ Other documents, as needed, on a case-by-case basis such as relevant prior Ordinances, Conditional Uses, historical documents, any “private or legal” agreements affecting the PUD etc. ___ Submerged Resource Surveys may be included here if required. _ X__ flash drive with only one pdf file for all documents I understand that by submitting the above materials, it is the agent’s/applicant’s responsibility to ensure all materials are in the same order for flash drive must contain the documents in one pdf file. It is the agent’s responsibility to ensure no documentation is left out. ________________________________________ ____________________ Signature of Agent Representative Date ________________________________________ Printed Name of Signing Agent Representative Page 320 of 590 Variance: 1. Request for a reduction is allowable setback from 10 feet to 2.7 feet from the property line. LDC Sec. 5.06.04.F(1)(b) 2. Request to increase height from 15 feet to a maximum of 17 feet. 5.06.04.F(1)(a) Justification Narrative: The request for this setback variance arises from modifications to the existing identification sign for Northtide Naples RV Resort, a 55+ community and recreational facility that serves both full-time and part-time residents. Clear and eƯective signage is crucial for wayfinding and identification within the community. The existing sign, a pole sign located at the northeast corner of the site at the intersection of North Rd and Airport Rd, required alterations due to the deteriorated condition of its cabinet. The cabinet, which was in disrepair, has been replaced using the original pole supports. The sign has been in this location for over two decades, but its current position and height do not comply with the Land Development Code (LDC) standards—specifically Sec. 5.06.04.F(1)(b) and Sec. 5.06.04.F(1)(a). Additionally, the area where the sign is located includes a decorative fountain and boulder feature. Due to the presence of these elements, relocating the sign to comply with LDC standards would significantly reduce its visibility to vehicular traƯic approaching the site. Therefore, we are requesting a reduction in the setback requirement from 10 feet to 2.7 feet, along with an increase in the allowable sign height by 2 feet from the centerline of the road to the sign’s location. This variance is specifically requested for the North elevation along North Rd. The setback and height adjustments are necessary to maintain eƯective wayfinding and identification for residents and visitors of Northtide Naples RV Park. Page 321 of 590 Page 322 of 590 Written Consent In Lieu of a Special Meeting of the Sole Member of CPI Rock Creek Owner, L.L.C. The undersigned, being the sole member of CPI Rock Creek Owner, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company (the “Company”), hereby take the following actions and adopt the following resolutions on the Company’s behalf: RESOLVED, that each of the following persons are hereby elected to the offices of the Company set opposite their respective names, to hold such offices until their successors shall be duly elected and qualified: OFFICERS TITLE Robert G. Stuckey President John F. Adams, Jr. Vice President Jonathan Bard Vice President Paul B. Brady Vice President Timothy Bruning Vice President Adam Buchwald Vice President Zachary Crowe Vice President Seth Davis Vice President Sarah Epps Vice President James Grippi Vice President Jason Hart Vice President Scott Jenkins Vice President Leo Krusius Vice President Thomas Levy Vice President Christopher S. Lippman Vice President Samira Madhany Vice President Page 323 of 590 Ryan Morrison Vice President Barbara Murphy Vice President Brian D. Nelsen Vice President Jade Newburn Vice President Richard Plackter Vice President Paul Randazzo Vice President John Rock Vice President Edward V. Samek Vice President Mark J. Schoenfeld Vice President Scott Weir Vice President James Williams Vice President Sanket Patel Secretary and Treasurer RESOLVED, that the President, any Vice President, Secretary, and Treasurer of the Company (in such capacity, each a “Designated Officer”) be, and each of them hereby is, authorized, empowered and directed, in the name and on behalf of the Company, to execute and deliver all such documents, certificates, notices or instruments as such Designated Officers may deem necessary or appropriate in furtherance of or in connection with each of the foregoing resolutions and to effectuate fully the purposes and intent thereof collectively, and further, that it be, and it is hereby, confirmed that all such actions taken by such Designated Officers are taken by such Designated Officers as representatives of the Company and not in their personal capacity. RESOLVED, that the Secretary of the Company be, and hereby is, authorized and directed to procure, or to authorize the procurement of, all books required by the laws of the State of Delaware or necessary and appropriate in connection with the business of the Company. RESOLVED, that the Designated Officers be, and each of them hereby is, authorized and directed to pay, or to authorize the payment of, all charges and expenses incident to or arising out of the organization of the Company, including fees and expenses of counsel, and to reimburse any person who has made any disbursements in respect thereof. RESOLVED, that the Designated Officers be, and each of them hereby is, authorized for and on behalf of the Company to designate from time to time one or more banks, Page 324 of 590 trust companies or other banking institutions (any thereof being hereinafter referred to as a “bank”) to act as depository or depositories for the funds of the Company for and during such period as he may from time deem necessary or desirable in the interests of the Company and to open or close out from time to time accounts in any such depositary so selected or reselected. RESOLVED, that the Designated Officers be, and each of them hereby is, authorized (a) to designate officers and employees who shall have authority to sign checks drawn against, and all orders for the payment or transfer of monies from, funds of the Company on deposit with any of the aforesaid banks, and (b) to revoke the authority of officers and employees now or hereafter authorized to sign such checks and orders. RESOLVED, that the Secretary and any other officer of the Company be, and each of them hereby is, authorized to certify to any of the aforesaid banks that the foregoing resolutions have been duly adopted and that they are in conformity with the certificate of formation and the limited liability company agreement of the Company. RESOLVED, that any of the foregoing actions taken by each such Designated Officer prior to the date hereof be and hereby is approved and ratified in all respects. Page 325 of 590 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this consent as of the 1st day of January, 2023. Sole Member: Carlyle Property Investors (Master REIT), L.L.C. By: _________________________________ Name: Jade Newburn Title: Vice President Page 326 of 590 Page 327 of 590 Page 328 of 590 Approved as noted Approved NORTHTIDE NAPLES 3100 North Road Naples Collier County, FL 206972 02-24-2024 PROJECT: Account Manager: SITE ADDRESS Quote: Project Manager / Project Leader Alexis Barry XXX DRB Designer: Revision: No. Date Description 01 03-26-2024 09-25-2024 customer up-date DRB up-date DRB Approval: This Drawing and all reproductions thereof are the property of Creative Sign Designs and may not be reproduced, published, changed or used in any way without written consent Sheet: Date: 12801 Commodity Place Tampa, Florida 33626 Phone: 813-818-7100 Fax: 813-749-2311 www.creativesigndesigns.com 02 03 04 05 05 1 1 of 2 Scale: 1/2”=1’-0” New Pole Covers for Existing D/F Sign Fabricated two-part pole cover, 2”x 2” aluminum angle inner frame with sheet aluminum filler, painted to match existing wood posts. 7’-5”6’-6” 2'-2"2'-2" Proposed Updated Conditions 8’-2” 0’-8”0’-8”16'-9 3/8"9’-4 3/8”Page 329 of 590 Approved as noted Approved NORTHTIDE NAPLES 3100 North Road Naples Collier County, FL 206972 02-24-2024 PROJECT: Account Manager: SITE ADDRESS Quote: Project Manager / Project Leader Alexis Barry XXX DRB Designer: Revision: No. Date Description 01 03-26-2024 09-25-2024 customer up-date DRB up-date DRB Approval: This Drawing and all reproductions thereof are the property of Creative Sign Designs and may not be reproduced, published, changed or used in any way without written consent Sheet: Date: 12801 Commodity Place Tampa, Florida 33626 Phone: 813-818-7100 Fax: 813-749-2311 www.creativesigndesigns.com 02 03 04 05 05 2 2 of 216’-9 3/8”6’-6”7’-5’15’-0"Page 330 of 590 VICINITY MAP - NOT TO SCALEMISCELLANEOUS NOTESSIGNIFICANT OBSERVATIONSITEMS CORRESPONDING TO SCHEDULE B-IIFLOOD NOTEZONING INFORMATION5RECORD DESCRIPTION6789101112LEGEND OF SYMBOLS & ABBREVIATIONS TVT(R)(M)POWER POLELIGHT POLEGUY WIREELECTRIC MANHOLEELECTRIC METERELECTRIC VAULTTRANSFORMERAIR CONDITIONER UNITTELEPHONE MANHOLETELEPHONE PEDESTALCABLE BOXSTORM DRAIN MANHOLESTORM DRAIN INLETSTORM PIPEGREASE TRAPTRAFFIC SIGNAL BOXSIGNAL LIGHT POLESIGNAL LIGHTVAULTSIGN (AS NOTED)TOWERMONITORING WELLFLAG POLEWATER VALVEFIRE HYDRANTSIAMESE FIRE HYDRANTWATER MANHOLEBACKFLOW PREVENTERWATER METERWELL HEADPOINT OF ACCESSEVOLPGO.R.SDSOHEGASWATER LINESTORM DRAIN LINESEWER LINEUNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINEGAS LINEOVERHEAD WIRESWW(P)P.B.F.D.O.T.SITE NO. 1That part of Section 2, Township 50 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, formerly described as Blocks F, G and H, of ROCK CREEK TERRACE, excepting therefrom the West100 feet, according to Plat Book 1, Page 40, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida.LESS THE NORTH 30 FEET THEREOF FOR ROAD RIGHT OF WAY.TOGETHER WITH VACATED ROCK CREEK DRIVE AND BURNHAM BOULEVARD, LYING SOUTH OF NORTH ROAD, NORTH OF ROCK CREEK AND BETWEEN BLOCKS F, G AND H, ROCKCREEK TERRACE, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 40, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.TOGETHER WITH:The Westerly 100 ft. of that part of ROCK CREEK TERRACE, a Subdivision according to the map or Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 1, Page 40, Collier County, Florida lying Northof Rock Creek, being the Westerly 100 ft. of vacated Blocks F and G of said subdivision, together with the part of Rock Creek Drive lying between the Westerly 100 feet of saidBlock, which drive was vacated by Resolution of Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida on April 4, 1950.LESS THE NORTH 30 FEET THEREOF FOR ROAD RIGHT OF WAY.AND FURTHER LESS AND EXCEPT the following described Parcel:A parcel of land being a part of vacated Blocks F, G and H of ROCK CREEK TERRACE, as recorded in Plat Book 1, Page 40 of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida lying Northof Rock Creek except the North 30 feet, which parcel of land is more particularly described as follows:Commencing at the Northwest corner of said vacated ROCK CREEK TERRACE, as recorded in Plat Book 1, Page 40 of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida; thence South00°43'45" East 224.00 feet along the West line of said ROCK CREEK TERRACE to the Point of Beginning; thence continue South 00°43'45" East along said West line of ROCK CREEKTERRACE to the mean high water line of Rock Creek; thence return to the Point of Beginning and run North 89°16'15" East 120.00 feet; thence South 00°43'45" East to the meanhigh water line of Rock Creek; thence along the mean high water line of Rock Creek to the West line of said ROCK CREEK TERRACE; said lands situate, lying and being in CollierCounty, Florida.SITE NO. 2A parcel of land being a part of vacated Blocks F, G and H of ROCK CREEK TERRACE, as recorded in Plat Book 1, Page 40 of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida lying Northof Rock Creek except the North 30 feet, which parcel of land is more particularly described as follows:Commencing at the Northwest corner of said vacated ROCK CREEK TERRACE, as recorded in Plat Book 1, Page 40, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida; thence South00°43'45" East 224.00 feet along the West line of said ROCK CREEK TERRACE to the Point of Beginning; thence continue South 00°43'45" East along said West line of ROCK CREEKTERRACE to the mean high water line of Rock Creek; thence return to the Point of Beginning and run North 89°16'15" East 120.00 feet; thence South 00°43'45" East to the meanhigh water line of Rock Creek; thence along the mean high water line of Rock Creek to the West line of said ROCK CREEK TERRACE; said lands situate, lying and being in CollierCounty, Florida.SITE NO. 3Parcel 1:Lots 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15, C.W. HUDDLESTON'S SUBDIVISION, according to the Plat recorded in Plat Book 2, Page 100, of the Public Records of Collier County,Florida, together with the following vacated rights-of-ways, to wit:The 60 foot Right-of-Way East of the Easterly lot line of Lot 11 of said C.W. HUDDLESTON'S SUBDIVISION and the 60 foot Right-of-Way between Lots 5 and 15 of the said C.W.HUDDLESTON'S SUBDIVISION, and that portion of Creek Avenue lying Westerly of the Easterly lot line of Lot 12 of C.W. HUDDLESTON'S SUBDIVISION; AND THAT 60 FOOT BY 60FOOT PORTION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY LYING BETWEEN THE NORTHERLY EXTENSIONS OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 11 AND THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 12, ALL AS VACATED BYRESOLUTION NO. 94-470, RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 1965, PAGE 2311, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.Parcel 2:INTENTIONALLY DELETED.Parcel 3:That portion of Lot 18 of NAPLES GROVES AND TRUCK COMPANY'S LITTLE FARMS NO. 2, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, lying North of Rock Creek, which isreplatted as a portion of Lot 12 of C.W. HUDDLESTON'S SUBDIVISION, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 2, Page 100, of the Public Records of Collier County,Florida; said land having as its boundaries as follows:1. North Boundary Line:North lines of Lot 18, of NAPLES GROVES AND TRUCK COMPANY'S LITTLE FARMS NO. 2;2. East and West Boundary Lines:The East and West Line of Lot 12 of C.W. HUDDLESTON'S SUBDIVISION extending South of the North line of Lot 18 of NAPLES GROVES AND TRUCK COMPANY'S LITTLE FARMS NO. 2 to the center of Rock Creek;3. South Boundary line:The Center of Rock Creek.Parcel 4:A portion of Lot 18, NAPLES GROVES AND TRUCK COMPANY'S LITTLE FARMS NO. 2, as recorded in Plat Book 1, Page 27, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, being moreparticularly described as follows:Commencing at the Northwest corner of Lot 18 of said NAPLES GROVES AND TRUCK COMPANY'S LITTLE FARMS NO. 2; thence North 89° 37' 11" East along the North Line of saidLot 18 for 183.16 feet to the Point of Beginning; thence continuing along the North Line of said Lot 18, North 89° 37'11" East 170.68 Feet; thence South 00° 37' 53" East 44.29 feet;thence run along the following three courses along the center line of Rock Creek: Course No. 1: South 77° 31' 00" West for 36.72 feet; Course No. 2: North 76° 59' 03" West for61.79 feet; Course No. 3: North 63° 39' 46" West for 83.80 feet to the Point of Beginning; less and except that part thereof conveyed by Deed recorded in Official Records Book665, Page 1935, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida.SITE NO. 4The East 60 feet of Lots 21 and 22 of NAPLES GROVES AND TRUCK COMPANY'S LITTLE FARMS NO. 2, as recorded in Plat Book 1, Page 27, of the Public Records of Collier County,Florida, lying North of Rock Creek, less the North 248.47 feet thereof.SITE NO. 5The East 238 feet of Lots 21 and 22, lying North of Rock Creek plus the West 25 feet of the vacated right-of-way along the East side of the subject property of that certainsubdivision in Section 2, Township 50 South, Range 25 East, known as NAPLES GROVES AND TRUCK COMPANY'S LITTLE FARMS, NO. 2, according to the plat thereof recorded inPlat Book 1, Page 27, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, less and except the following described parcel:The East 60 feet of Lots 21 and 22, less the North 248.47 feet of NAPLES GROVES AND TRUCK COMPANY'S LITTLE FARMS, NO. 2, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book1, Page 27, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida.All of said lands situate, lying and being in Collier County, Florida.(CONTINUED TO LEFT IN "AS SURVEYED METES AND BOUNDS")SANITARY MANHOLE CLEAN OUT GAS MANHOLEGAS VALVE GAS METER HANDICAPPED PARKINGMITERED END SECTIONBENCHMARKRECORD MEASURED PLATVOLUMEPAGEOFFICIAL RECORDSPLAT BOOKFLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION(D)DESCRIPTIONThe lands surveyed, shown and described hereon are the same lands as described in Fidelity National Title Insurance Company'sCommitment No. 8758146 bearing an effective date of December 19, 2020, as revised by Revision Number: # 6 - December 29, 2020.PER PZR REPORT FOR:ROCK CREEK CAMPGROUNDDATE: DRAFT - 12/28/2020PZR SITE NUMBER: 142639-1JURISDICTION: COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDAZONING DESIGNATION: "TTRVC" TRAVEL TRAILER-RECREATIONALVEHICLE CAMPGROUND DISTRICTBUILDING SETBACK LINES:FRONT: 15 FEETSIDE: 5 FEET FOR NON-WATERFRONT; 10 FEET FOR WATERFRONT(5 FEET REQUIRED)REAR: 8 FEET FOR NON-WATERFRONT; 10 FEET FOR WATERFRONT(10 FEET REQUIRED)EXTERIOR BOUNDARY OF PARK: 50 FEETEXTERNAL STREET: 50 FEETINTERNAL STREET: 25 FEETANY BUILDING OR OTHER STRUCTURE: 10 FEETMAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: 30 FEETBUILDING DENSITY: NONE SPECIFIEDPARKING SPACES REQUIRED: 237BY GRAPHIC PLOTTING ONLY, THIS ENTIRE PROPERTY IS IN ZONE AE OF THE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP,COMMUNITY NO. 120067, MAP NUMBER 12021C0394H WHICH BEARS AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF MAY 16, 2012AND IS IN A SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA. AS SHOWN ON THE FEMA WEBSITE (HTTP://MSC.FEMA.GOV) WEHAVE LEARNED THIS COMMUNITY DOES CURRENTLY PARTICIPATE IN THE PROGRAM. NO FIELD SURVEYINGWAS PERFORMED TO DETERMINE THIS ZONE. AND A FLOOD ELEVATION CERTIFICATE MAY BE NEEDED TOVERIFY THIS DETERMINATION OR APPLY FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENTAGENCY.In the State of FloridaDate of Plat or Map: 12/30/2020JA ME SDENNISBRAYPSM6507STATE OFFLORIDAProfessionalSurveyorand M apper Lic e nseNumberJames D. BrayRegistered Land Surveyor No. 6507DESCRIPTIONDRAFTED: SAHFIELD WORK: WBCHECKED BY: JBDATEPROJECT REVISION RECORDDESCRIPTIONDATEFB & PG: N/AforRock Creek RV Resort3100 North Road, Naples, FL 34104BASED UPON TITLE COMMITMENT NO. 8758146, REVISION 6OF FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANYBEARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF DECEMBER 19, 2020 @ 8:00 A.M.Surveyor's CertificationTo: Fidelity National Title Insurance Company; CPI Rock Creek Owner, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company; Western-Southern LifeAssurance Company, its successors and/or assigns; Pircher, Nichols and Meeks LLP and Integrity Life Insurance Company, an Ohiocorporation, and its successors and/or assigns:THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP OR PLAT AND THE SURVEY ON WHICH IT IS BASED WERE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2016MINIMUM STANDARD DETAIL REQUIREMENTS FOR ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEYS, JOINTLY ESTABLISHED AND ADOPTED BY ALTA ANDNSPS, AND INCLUDES ITEMS 1, 2, 3, 4, 6a, 6b, 7a, 7c, 8, 9, 13, 16, 19, 20 and 21 OF TABLE A THEREOF. THE FIELD WORK WAS COMPLETEDON DECEMBER 30, 2020.ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEYSHEET 1 OF 5MN1MN2MN3MN4MN5MN6MN7MN8MN9MN10MN11MN12MN13MN14Some features shown on this plat may be shown out of scale for clarity.Dimensions on this plat are expressed in feet and decimal parts thereof unlessotherwise noted. Monuments were found at points where indicated.Bearings are based on the South Right-of-way line of North Road being: N89°37'41"E(ASSUMED).There are 0 striped parking spaces on the surveyed property. However, surveyorobserved that there is at least one parking space available for each pad site.At the time of the ALTA Survey, there was no observable evidence of earth movingwork, building construction or building additions within recent months.At the time of the ALTA Survey there were no changes in street right-of-way lineseither completed or proposed, and available from the controlling jurisdiction orobservable evidence of recent street or sidewalk construction repairs.At the time of the ALTA Survey there was no observed evidence of substantial areas ofrefuse.The surveyed property has access to North Road as indicated by the arrows (--->) onthe drawing.Subject property shown hereon contains 702,870 square feet or 16.1357 acres, moreor less.Utilities shown hereon are shown based on observable aboveground evidence only.The surveyor was not provided any documentation, was not made aware and did notobserve any ground markings on the subject property with regards to wetlands on thesurveyed property.At the time of the ALTA Survey there was no observable evidence of site use ascemeteries, grave sites, and/or burial groundsThis ALTA Survey is "Not Valid" without the signature and the original raised seal of thisFlorida licensed Surveyor and Mapper, unless provided with electronic signature andability to validate. (See: www.altamaxsurveying.com for instructions on signaturevalidation). The seal appearing on this document was authorized by the signingProfessional Surveyor and Mapper on the Date of the electronic signature.Address 3100 North Road was disclosed in Record Documents and observed whileconducting the survey.Elevations are based on Benchmark designation BM 4 RESET, being: 7.091 feet,NAVD88, published by Florida Department of Transportation District One. Elevationsare shown in the areas specified by client.Site contains 241 Mobile Home pads, as shown with the aid of brochure provided byRock Creek RV Resort.INTENTIONALLY DELETEDINTENTIONALLY DELETEDINTENTIONALLY DELETEDResolution No. 92-151 by Collier County as to those lands lying totally or partially within the airportnoise zone pursuant to Ordinance No. 91-40, recorded on June 15, 1992 in Official Records Book 1725,Page 2111, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. (ON SUBJECT PROPERTY, BLANKET INNATURE.)Right-of-way Easement granted to Collier County over the North 30 feet of the East 238 feet of Lot 21 ofNAPLES GROVES AND TRUCK COMPANY'S LITTLE FARMS NO. 2 attached to Resolution No. 95-458 byCollier County, recorded on August 22, 1995 in Official Records Book 2092, Page 444, of the PublicRecords of Collier County, Florida. (ON SITE NO. 5, SHOWN HEREON.)Easement granted to Florida Power & Light Company, recorded in Official Records Book 2259, Page 362,of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. (ON SITE NOS. 4 & 5, BLANKET IN NATURE. RECORDEDDOCUMENT DOES NOT DEFINE THE LOCATION OF THE EASEMENT)Easement for Cable Television and Communications Service granted to Time Warner Cable, Inc.,recorded on August 29, 2005 in Official Records Book 3878, Page 502, of the Public Records of CollierCounty, Florida. (ON SITE'S NO. 1, 2, AND 4, ON SITE 3, PARCELS 1, 2 AND 3, BLANKET IN NATURE.)Rights of tenants occupying all or part of the insured land under unrecorded leases or rentalagreements. (Not a survey matter.)The insured "Land" as defined by the policy shall not include any mobile home or recreational vehiclewhich may be affixed to or located on the Land, and title to any such mobile home is not insured. (Not asurvey matter.)Any claim that any portion of the insured land is sovereign lands of the State of Florida, includingsubmerged, filled or artificially exposed lands accreted to such land. (Not a survey matter.)The nature, extent or existence of riparian rights or littoral rights is not insured. (Not a survey matter.)Title to any submerged land included within the land described in this Policy is not insured. (Not asurvey matter.)Notwithstanding the legal description in Schedule A, this Policy does not insure title to any lands lyingbelow the mean or ordinary high water line of any navigable or tidally influenced waters. (Not a surveymatter.)Rights of upper and lower stream owners in and to the use of the waters of Rock Creek and to thecontinued uninterrupted flow thereof. (Not a survey matter.)Deed of Conservation Easement in favor of South Florida Water Management District (grantee), datedMarch 24, 2003, recorded on March 27, 2003 in Official Records Book 3250, Page 807, of the PublicRecords of Collier County, Florida. (ON SITE NO. 3, SHOWN HEREON.)13141516171819 - WOOD DOCK FALLS WITHIN CONSERVATION EASEMENT, OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 3250, PAGE 807NORTH RDSITEPREACHER CT ESTEY AVESHADOWLAWN DR AIRPORT-PULLING RD MN15MN16AS SURVEYED METES AND BOUNDS(CONTINUED FROM, SEE RIGHT "RECORD DESCRIPTION")ALL OF THE ABOVE BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS:BEGIN AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 15, C.W. HUDDLESTON'S SUBDIVISION, ASRECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 2, PAGE 100, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; RUNTHENCE N89°37'41”E, ALONG THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF NORTH ROAD, A DISTANCEOF 1316.92 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF BLOCK “H”, ROCK CREEK TERRACE, AS RECORDED IN PLATBOOK 1, PAGE 40, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS VACATED BY RESOLUTIONNO. 11278, IN MINUTE BOOK 3, PAGE 268 AND DEED BOOK 16, PAGE 288, PUBLIC RECORDS OFCOLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE S00°30'11”E, ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF BLOCK “H”, ADISTANCE OF 26 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE MEAN HIGH WATER LINE OF ROCK CREEK; THENCEWESTERLY ALONG SAID MEAN HIGH WATER LINE OF ROCK CREEK TO THE EAST LINE OF LOT 5 OFSAID C.W. HUDDLESTON'S SUBDIVISION; THENCE S00°43'40”E, ALONG SAID EAST LINE OFLOT 5 TO THE CENTER OF ROCK CREEK; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID CENTER OF ROCK CREEKTO THE WEST LINE OF LOT 14 OF SAID C.W. HUDDLESTON'S SUBDIVISION; THENCEN00°37'43”W, ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF LOT 14 TO SAID MEAN HIGH WATER LINE OF ROCKCREEK; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID MEAN HIGH WATER LINE OF ROCK CREEK TO THE WESTLINE OF THE EAST 238 FEET OF LOT 22, NAPLES GROVES AND TRUCK CO'S LITTLE FARMS NO. 2,AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 27, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIERCOUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE N00°37'43”W, ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF THE EAST 238 FEET OFLOT 22 AND THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 238 FEET OF LOT 21 OF SAID NAPLES GROVES ANDTRUCK CO'S LITTLE FARMS NO. 2, A DISTANCE OF 570 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE SOUTH RIGHTOF WAY LINE OF SAID NORTH ROAD, PER OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK, 2092, PAGE 444, PUBLICRECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE N89°37'41”E, ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT OFWAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 263.14 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.TBTOP OF BANKA - WOOD DOCK AND BOAT SLIP CROSS SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY LINE - WOOD DOCK CROSSES SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY LINE - FOUNTAIN, BRICK PAVERS, CONCRETE WALK AND VINYL FENCE CROSS NORTHERLY BOUNDARYBCDClient Comments01/07/2021Certification2/23/2021Add boundary ties to sign5/30/2023910 Belle Avenue, Suite 1100Casselberry, FL 32708Phone: 407-677-0200Licensed Business No. 7833www.altamaxsurveying.comAltamax SurveyingJames@altamaxsurveying.comSpot Elevations around sign1/30/2024Page 331 of 590 APPROXIMATE CENTERLINEROCK CREEKC.W. HUDDLESTON'S SUBDIVISIONPB 2, PG 100LOT 15PB 2, PG 100LOT 5PB 2, PG 100LOT 13PB 2, PG 100LOT 12PB 2, PG 100LOT 11PB 2, PG 100LOT 10PB 2, PG 100LOT 9PB 2, PG 100LOT 8PB 2, PG 100LOT 7PB 2, PG 100LOT 6PB 2, PG 100LOT 20NAPLES GROVES AND TRUCK CO'SLITTLE FARMS NO. 2PB 1, PG 27LOT 19NAPLES GROVES AND TRUCK CO'SLITTLE FARMS NO. 2PB 1, PG 27LOT18NAPLES GROVES AND TRUCK CO'SLITTLE FARMS NO. 2PB 1, PG 27PARCEL 1ORB 3365, PG 2406E 60', LOTS 21 & 22LESS N 248.47'LANDS DESCRIBEDORB 3471, PG 1463SITE NO. 3PARCEL 1E. LINE, LOT 11 PB 2, PG 100 E. LINE, LOT 12PB 2, PG 100SITE NO. 3PARCEL 1, TOGETHER WITHVACATED 60' R/WE. OF E'LY LINE, LOT 11ORB 984, PG 221ORB 1965, PG 2311SITE NO. 3PARCEL 1SITE NO. 3 PARCEL 1, TOGETHER WITH VACATED 60' R/W BETWEEN LOTS 5 & 15 ORB 984, PG 221 ORB 1965, PG 2311SITE NO. 3PARCEL 1, TOGETHER WITHVACATED 60' R/WW'LY. OF E'LY LINE, LOT 11ORB 1965, PG 2311SITE NO. 3PARCEL 3(CROSS HATCHED)SITE NO. 3PARCEL 4 (LESS)DB 665, PG 1935N. LINE, LOT 18PB 1, PG 27P.O.C.SITE NO. 3PARCEL 4NW CORNER, LOT 18PB 1, PG 27N89°37'11"E 183.16'P.O.B.SITE NO. 3PARCEL 4N89°37'11"E170.68'S 7 7 ° 3 1 ' 0 0 "W 3 6 . 7 2 'N76°59'03"W 61.79'LOT 21NAPLES GROVES AND TRUCK CO'SLITTLE FARMS NO. 2PB 1, PG 27LOT 22NAPLES GROVES AND TRUCK CO'SLITTLE FARMS NO. 2PB 1, PG 27E. 60', LOT 21PB 1, PG 27E. 60', LOT 22PB 1, PG 27SITE NO. 4SITE NO. 5(LESS)SITE NO. 4LESS N. 248.47'TBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBT B T B T B T B TBTBTB TB T B TB TB TB TB T BTBTBTBTBTBTBTBT B TB TB TBTBTBT B TB TB TB TBT B T B TB TB T B 1 5 ' 1 5 . 1 '17.1'17'1 STORY BLOCKMAINTENANCEHEIGHT=12.1'±36'18.1'31'27'1 STORY BLOCK(C2)WOODDECK75.1'50'12.9'8.4'1 STORY BLOCKCLUB HOUSEHEIGHT=18.3'±EEOHOHOHOHOHOHFOUND 3"x3"CONCRETE MONUMENTNO #ALSOFND 1" IRON PIPENO #(0.41'N, 0.08'E)FOUND 5/8" CAPPED IRON ROADILLEGIBLE(0.42'S, 1.04'W)P.O.B(AS SURVEYED METES AND BOUNDS)NW CORNER, LOT 15PB 2, PG 100FOUND NAIL AND DISKILLEGIBLEWOODDOCKTBCAMERA POLEEDGE OF PAVEMENTEDGE OF PAVEMENTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALT ASPHALT AS P H A L T ASPHALT A S P H A L T ASPHALTASPHALTEDGE OF PAVEMENTEDGE OF PAVEMENTEDGE OF PAVEMENTEDGE OF PAVEMENTE D G E O F P A V EM EN T EDGE OF PAVEMENT COVEREDCONCRETECONCRETE PADCONCRETE PADCOVEREDCONCRETECONCRETE PADCONCRETE PADCONCRETE PAD 6' WOOD FENCEEDGE OF PAVEMENTSTOP BAR (TYPICAL)LOT 14PB 2, PG 100CONCRETEWOODDOCKBRICKPAVERSWOODDOCKWOODDOCKWOODDOCKCONCRETE1 STORY BLOCK(C2)1 STORY BLOCK(C1)WOODDOCK3' VINYL FENCEBRICKPAVERS12.3'x4.1' SHED6.9'x6.9' SHEDBRICKPAVERSCOVEREDBRICKPAVERS4' CHAIN LINK FENCE10' WOOD FENCE6' VINYL FENCE POOLGATEGATECONCRETECONCRETECONCRETE STEPS (TYPICAL)CONCRETE BLOCK WALL (TYPICAL)COVERED CONCRETE COVERED CONCRETECOVEREDCONCRETECONCRETECOLUMN(TYPICAL)CONCRETE6' WOODFENCE4 ' W O O D F E N C E 8' WOOD FENCEE. LINE, LOT 12PB 2, PG 100W. LINE, LOT 12PB 2, PG 100SITE NO. 3PARCEL 4E. 238' LOT 22PB 1, PG 27E. 238' LOT 21PB 1, PG 27SITE NO. 5SITE NO. 3PARCEL 1, TOGETHER WITHVACATED 60' R/WORB 1965, PG 231130' R/W PERORB 2092, PG 44425'25'SITE NO. 5W. 25' VACATED R/WORB 2092, PG 444 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OFCONSERVATION EASEMENTORB 3250, PG 80719SD SDTOP=3.43E. INV=2.57S. INV=2.32SDO 6" PVC SDO6" PVCSDSDSD SDOSDO 15" RCP15" RCP15" RCP TOP=3.62W. INV=0.96SE INV=0.91TOP=4.39S. INV=1.59NW INV=1.46SD12" PVCSDOTOP=2.11W. INV=0.618" PVCINV=-0.46TOP=3.76BOTTOM=-0.76N63°39'46"W 83.80'CONCRETE PADCONCRETE PAD10.1'x8.9'1 STORY BLOCKPUMP HOUSEGAZEBOSTEPS12.1'21.9'9.9'13.1'8.8'2.2'SHED EϬϬΣϯϳΖϰϯΗtϱϳϬΖц EϴϵΣϯϳΖϰϭΗϭϯϭϲ͘ϵϮΖ0.2'W0.5'E0.5'W0.5'E20.1'INV=-1.82(30" RCP)CONCRETEHEAD WALL20.6'NORTH ROADVARIABLE WIDTH PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAYS. R/W LINE(BEARING BASIS)EEEEEEEETIRRIGATIONVALVEVIRRIGATIONVALVETTTIRRIGATIONVALVEEEELIFT STATION5.644.844.674.672.122.122.202.203.023.020.252.200.180.182.502.502.632.632.632.430.060.061.241.352.520.151.552.181.791.171.171.180.490.611.583.380.440.951.231.080.200.431.571.500.440.440.230.231.030.522.082.082.080.530.212.292.292.550.540.540.543.320.182.440.370.370.372.440.540.092.340.350.110.111.990.350.102.660.080.082.500.690.690.27TB TB TB TB TBTBTBTBTBTBIRRIGATIONVALVEVTTTTTTTTWOODDOCKWOODDOCKWOODDOCKHEADWALLCOVEREDBOAT SLIPCOVEREDBOAT SLIPCOVEREDBOAT SLIPWOODDOCKWOODDOCKWOODDOCKWOODDOCKWOODDOCKWOODDOCKLOT18NAPLES GROVES AND TRUCK CO'SLITTLE FARMS NO. 2PB 1, PG 27MEAN HIGH WATERELEVATION=0.3'ROCK CREEKROCK CREEK 50' ROAD PERPB 1, PG 27E. 1/2 OF ROAD REPLATTED INTOLOTS PER BP 2, PG 100 VACATED 25' R/WORB 2092, PG 444 R/W PERPB 1, PG 2730' R/WPB 2, PG 100N. LINE, LOT 18PB 1, PG 27S00°37'53"E 44.29'WOODDOCK30' R/WPB 2, PG 100WES T E R L YWESTERLYWESTERLYWESTERLYWESTERLYWESTERLYWESTERLYWESTERLYW. LINE, LOT 14PB 2, PG 100EϬϬΣϯϳΖϰϯΗtMEAN HIGH WATERELEVATION=0.3'W. LINE, E. 238', LOT 22PB 1, PG 27S. R/W LINEORB 2092, PG 444EϴϵΣϯϳΖϰϭΗϮϲϯ͘ϭϰΖ10' BUILDING SETBACK LINE10' BUILDING SETBACK LINE10' BUILDING SETBACK LINE5' BUILDING SETBACK LINE AB10.2'C0.6'SAPPROXIMATE CENTERLINEROCK CREEKBM #1SHEET 2 OF 5SCALE : 1" = 0'20'40'80'40'LEGEND OF SYMBOLS & ABBREVIATIONS TVT(R)(M)POWER POLELIGHT POLEGUY WIREELECTRIC MANHOLEELECTRIC METERELECTRIC VAULTTRANSFORMERAIR CONDITIONER UNITTELEPHONE MANHOLETELEPHONE PEDESTALCABLE BOXSTORM DRAIN MANHOLESTORM DRAIN INLETSTORM PIPEGREASE TRAPTRAFFIC SIGNAL BOXSIGNAL LIGHT POLESIGNAL LIGHTVAULTSIGN (AS NOTED)TOWERMONITORING WELLFLAG POLEWATER VALVEFIRE HYDRANTSIAMESE FIRE HYDRANTWATER MANHOLEBACKFLOW PREVENTERWATER METERWELL HEADPOINT OF ACCESSEVOLPGO.R.SDSOHEGASWATER LINESTORM DRAIN LINESEWER LINEUNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINEGAS LINEOVERHEAD WIRESWW(P)P.B.F.D.O.T.SANITARY MANHOLE CLEAN OUT GAS MANHOLEGAS VALVE GAS METER HANDICAPPED PARKINGMITERED END SECTIONBENCHMARKRECORD MEASURED PLATVOLUMEPAGEOFFICIAL RECORDSPLAT BOOKFLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION(D)DESCRIPTIONMATCH LINE - SHEET 3 OF 3 TBTOP OF BANK910 Belle Avenue, Suite 1100Casselberry, FL 32708Phone: 407-677-0200Licensed Business No. 7833www.altamaxsurveying.comAltamax SurveyingJames@altamaxsurveying.comPage 332 of 590 LOT 1BLOCK "H"PB 1, PG 40LOT 2BLOCK "H"PB 1, PG 40LOT 3BLOCK "H"PB 1, PG 40LOT 4BLOCK "H"PB 1, PG 40LOT 5BLOCK "H"PB 1, PG 40LOT 1BLOCK "G"PB 1, PG 40LOT 3BLOCK "G"PB 1, PG 40LOT 5BLOCK "G"PB 1, PG 40LOT 6BLOCK "G"PB 1, PG 40BURNHAM BOULEVARD (60' VACATED R/W) PB 1, PG 40ROCK CREEK DRIVE (60 ' VACATED R/W) (VACATED BY RESOLUT ION DATED APR IL 4 , 1950)PB 1 , PG 40LOT 6BLOCK "F"PB 1, PG 40LOT 5BLOCK "F"PB 1, PG 40LOT 4BLOCK "F"PB 1, PG 40LOT 3BLOCK "F"PB 1, PG 40LOT 1BLOCK "F"PB 1, PG 40LOT 2BLOCK "F"PB 1, PG 40SITE NO. 1 (LESS W. 100')SITE NO. 1 (TOGETHER WITH W'LY 100')PARCEL IIW'LY, 100', BLOCK'S "F", "G" & "H"ORB 3474, PG 2610 N'LY SHORE ROCK CREEKAS SHOWN ON PB 1, PG 40MEAN HIGH WATER LINE, ROCK CREEKS'LY BOUNDARY FOR LESS OUTP.O.CSITE NO. 1(LESS AND EXCEPT)SITE NO. 2NW CORNERPB 1, PG 40W. LINE, PB 1, PG 40P.O.BSITE NO. 1(LESS AND EXCEPT)SITE NO. 2EXCEPTING NORTH 30'NO DOCUMENTATIONAPPROXIMATE CENTERLINEROCK CREEKROCK CREEK TERRACEPB 1, PG 40LOT 5PB 2, PG 100LOT 9PB 2, PG 100LOT 8PB 2, PG 100LOT 7PB 2, PG 100LOT 6PB 2, PG 100LOT18NAPLES GROVES AND TRUCK CO'SLITTLE FARMS NO. 2PB 1, PG 27SITE NO. 1SITE NO. 2SITE NO. 1(LESS AND EXCEPT)TRACT 1MERIDIAN VILLAGE PHASE 2PB 55, PG 94TRACT 2MERIDIAN VILLAGE PHASE 2PB 55, PG 94S00°43'45"E 224.00'S00°43'45"E N89°16'15"E 120.00'S00°43'45"ESITE NO. 3PARCEL 1, TOGETHER WITHVACATED 60' R/WE. OF E'LY LINE, LOT 11ORB 984, PG 221ORB 1965, PG 2311SITE NO. 3PARCEL 1, TOGETHER WITHVACATED 60' R/WBETWEEN LOTS 5 & 15ORB 984, PG 221ORB 1965, PG 2311N. LINE, LOT 18PB 1, PG 27TB TB TB TB TBTBTB TB TB TB TB TB TB TB TB TB TB TBTBTBTBTBTBTBT B TB T B T B T B TBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBT B TBTB TB TBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTB TB TB TB TBTB TB TB TB TB TB TB15'15.1'17.1'17'1 STORY BLOCKMAINTENANCEHEIGHT=12.1'±14.4'53'39.7'12.1'62.7'9.7'21.8'8'8'0.4'3.4'1 STORY BLOCKAND FRAME(OFFICE)HEIGHT=12.3'±75.1'50'12.9'22.2'4.1'8.4'5.8'1 STORY BLOCKCLUB HOUSEHEIGHT=18.3'±WOODSHEDEEEOH OHOHOHOHOHOHOHOH FOUND 3"x3" CONCRETE MONUMENTNO #FOUND NAIL AND DISKLB #43(0.21'S, 0.76'E)EDGE OF PAVEMENTEDGE OF PAVEMENTEDGE OF PAVEMENTEDGE OF PAVEMENT ASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALT ASPHALTASPHALTASPHALT ASPHALT ASPHALT ASPHALT ASPHALTASPHALTEDGE OF PAVEMENTEDGE OF PAVEMENT CONCRETE PADCONCRETE PADCONCRETE PAD 6' WOOD FENCEEDGE OF PAVEMENTCONCRETE PADCONCRETE PADBRICKPAVERSBRICKPAVERSSTOP BAR (TYPICAL)STOP BAR (TYPICAL)2' CONCRETE CURB & GUTTERLOT 4BLOCK "G"PB 1, PG 40LOT 2BLOCK "G"PB 1, PG 40TB TBCONCRETE BLOCKWALL (TYPICAL)POOLFOUNTAIN GATEGATECONCRETECONCRETECONCRETESTEPS (TYPICAL)CONCRETE BLOCKWALL (TYPICAL)COVEREDCONCRETECOVERED CONCRETECOVEREDCONCRETECONCRETECOLUMN(TYPICAL)CONCRETE6' WOODFENCE4' WOODFENCE 4' WIREFENCE6' WOODFENCELSATOP=3.76BOTTOM=-0.76SDINV=0.99TOP=2.49N. INV=1.01S. INV=0.996" PVC SDOSD12" PVCTOP=2.81SE INV=1.71SDOINV=0.13(8" PVC)INV=0.86(8" PVC)4' WOOD FENCEBRICKPAVERS4' WOOD FENCE4' WOOD FENCEBOLLARD (TYPICAL)CONCRETEHEAD WALLCONCRETEHEAD WALLCONCRETEHEAD WALLCONCRETEHEAD WALL4' WOOD FENCE4' WOOD FENCEINV=-2.27(42" RCP)INV=-2.50(42" RCP)INV=-2.62(42" RCP)CONCRETE WALKCONCRETE WALK CONCRETEBLOCK WALLFOUNTAINBRICKPAVERSCONCRETEWALK4' VINYL FENCECONCRETE PADGUARD RAILPEDESTRIAN SIGNAL POLEFIBER OPTIC CABLE BOXSIGN42.3'34.5'7.3'6'33.1'30.2'60.2'6.2'CONCRETEPADCOVEREDCONCRETECOVEREDCONCRETE 12'x4.7'WOOD SHEDCONCRETECONCRETE PAD2 STORYFRAMEHEIGHT=13.4'±BRICKPAVERSCONCRETE PADCONCRETE PAD10.1'x8.9'1 STORY BLOCKPUMP HOUSEEϴϵΣϯϳΖϰϭΗϭϯϭϲ͘ϵϮΖ^ϬϬΣϯϬΖϭϭΗϮϲΖц20.6' 19.1'2.4'7.9'NORTH ROADVARIABLE WIDTH PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAYS. R/W LINE(BEARING BASIS)EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEVIRRIGATIONVALVETIRRIGATIONVALVEELIFT STATIONTELIFT STATION5.642.172.205.153.933.921.841.842.032.032.392.392.392.392.392.392.392.392.392.392.292.292.292.822.042.042.042.042.042.042.044.844.844.674.672.122.122.202.203.023.020.252.200.180.182.502.502.632.632.632.430.060.061.552.18TEEEEEETWOODDOCKCOVEREDBOAT SLIPCOVEREDBOAT SLIPCOVEREDBOAT SLIPWOODDOCKWOODDOCKWOODDOCKWOODDOCKWOODDOCKWOODDOCK1.630.74INV=0.74INV=1.6312" PVCCONCRETE PADMEAN HIGH WATERELEVATION=0.3'AIRPORT-PULLING ROAD VARIABLE WIDTH PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAYROCK CREEKROCK CREEK30' R/WPB 2, PG 100E. LINE, BLOCK "H"PB 1, PG 40W E S T E R L YWE S T E R L YWESTERLYE. LINE, LOT 5PB 2, PG 100^ϬϬΣϰϯΖϰϬΗWESTERLYWESTERLY 10' BUILDING SETBACK LINE10' BUILDING SETBACK LINE5' BUILDING SETBACK LINE10' BUILDING SETBACK LINE10' INGRESS/EGRESSORB 3474, PG 2610ORB 5571, PG 385B10.2'C0.6'SD17.1'2.7'26.9'EPEPCONCMEDIANBM #1BM #2SITE BENCHMARK #ELEVATION = DATUM = NAVD 881BM N&D4.65SITE BENCHMARK #ELEVATION = DATUM = NAVD 882BM N&D3.68SCALE : 1" = 0'20'40'80'40'SHEET 3 OF 5LEGEND OF SYMBOLS & ABBREVIATIONS TVT(R)(M)POWER POLELIGHT POLEGUY WIREELECTRIC MANHOLEELECTRIC METERELECTRIC VAULTTRANSFORMERAIR CONDITIONER UNITTELEPHONE MANHOLETELEPHONE PEDESTALCABLE BOXSTORM DRAIN MANHOLESTORM DRAIN INLETSTORM PIPEGREASE TRAPTRAFFIC SIGNAL BOXSIGNAL LIGHT POLESIGNAL LIGHTVAULTSIGN (AS NOTED)TOWERMONITORING WELLFLAG POLEWATER VALVEFIRE HYDRANTSIAMESE FIRE HYDRANTWATER MANHOLEBACKFLOW PREVENTERWATER METERWELL HEADPOINT OF ACCESSEVOLPGO.R.SDSOHEGASWATER LINESTORM DRAIN LINESEWER LINEUNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINEGAS LINEOVERHEAD WIRESWW(P)P.B.F.D.O.T.SANITARY MANHOLE CLEAN OUT GAS MANHOLEGAS VALVE GAS METER HANDICAPPED PARKINGMITERED END SECTIONBENCHMARKRECORD MEASURED PLATVOLUMEPAGEOFFICIAL RECORDSPLAT BOOKFLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION(D)DESCRIPTIONMATCH LINE - SHEET 2 OF 3 TBTOP OF BANK910 Belle Avenue, Suite 1100Casselberry, FL 32708Phone: 407-677-0200Licensed Business No. 7833www.altamaxsurveying.comAltamax SurveyingJames@altamaxsurveying.comPage 333 of 590 APPROXIMATE CENTERLINEROCK CREEKC.W. HUDDLESTON'S SUBDIVISIONPB 2, PG 100LOT 15PB 2, PG 100LOT 5PB 2, PG 100LOT 13PB 2, PG 100LOT 12PB 2, PG 100LOT 11PB 2, PG 100LOT 10PB 2, PG 100LOT 9PB 2, PG 100LOT 8PB 2, PG 100LOT 7PB 2, PG 100LOT 6PB 2, PG 100LOT 20NAPLES GROVES AND TRUCK CO'SLITTLE FARMS NO. 2PB 1, PG 27LOT 19NAPLES GROVES AND TRUCK CO'SLITTLE FARMS NO. 2PB 1, PG 27LOT18NAPLES GROVES AND TRUCK CO'SLITTLE FARMS NO. 2PB 1, PG 27PARCEL 1ORB 3365, PG 2406E 60', LOTS 21 & 22LESS N 248.47'LANDS DESCRIBEDORB 3471, PG 1463SITE NO. 3PARCEL 1E. LINE, LOT 11 PB 2, PG 100 E. LINE, LOT 12PB 2, PG 100SITE NO. 3PARCEL 1, TOGETHER WITHVACATED 60' R/WE. OF E'LY LINE, LOT 11ORB 984, PG 221ORB 1965, PG 2311SITE NO. 3PARCEL 1SITE NO. 3 PARCEL 1, TOGETHER WITH VACATED 60' R/W BETWEEN LOTS 5 & 15 ORB 984, PG 221 ORB 1965, PG 2311SITE NO. 3PARCEL 1, TOGETHER WITHVACATED 60' R/WW'LY. OF E'LY LINE, LOT 11ORB 1965, PG 2311SITE NO. 3PARCEL 3(CROSS HATCHED)SITE NO. 3PARCEL 4 (LESS)DB 665, PG 1935N. LINE, LOT 18PB 1, PG 27P.O.C.SITE NO. 3PARCEL 4NW CORNER, LOT 18PB 1, PG 27N89°37'11"E 183.16'P.O.B.SITE NO. 3PARCEL 4N89°37'11"E170.68'S 7 7 ° 3 1 ' 0 0 "W 3 6 . 7 2 'N76°59'03"W 61.79'LOT 21NAPLES GROVES AND TRUCK CO'SLITTLE FARMS NO. 2PB 1, PG 27LOT 22NAPLES GROVES AND TRUCK CO'SLITTLE FARMS NO. 2PB 1, PG 27E. 60', LOT 21PB 1, PG 27E. 60', LOT 22PB 1, PG 27SITE NO. 4SITE NO. 5(LESS)SITE NO. 4LESS N. 248.47'TBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBT B T B T B T B TBTBTB TB T B TB TB TB TB T BTBTBTBTBTBTBTBT B TB TB TBTBTBT B TB TB TB TBT B T B TB TB T B 1 5 ' 1 5 . 1 '17.1'17'1 STORY BLOCKMAINTENANCEHEIGHT=12.1'±36'18.1'31'27'1 STORY BLOCK(C2)WOODDECK75.1'50'12.9'8.4'1 STORY BLOCKCLUB HOUSEHEIGHT=18.3'±EEOHOHOHOHOHOHFOUND 3"x3"CONCRETE MONUMENTNO #ALSOFND 1" IRON PIPENO #(0.41'N, 0.08'E)FOUND 5/8" CAPPED IRON ROADILLEGIBLE(0.42'S, 1.04'W)P.O.B(AS SURVEYED METES AND BOUNDS)NW CORNER, LOT 15PB 2, PG 100FOUND NAIL AND DISKILLEGIBLEWOODDOCKTBCAMERA POLEEDGE OF PAVEMENTEDGE OF PAVEMENTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALT ASPHALT AS P H A L T ASPHALT A S P H A L T ASPHALTASPHALTEDGE OF PAVEMENTEDGE OF PAVEMENTEDGE OF PAVEMENTEDGE OF PAVEMENTE D G E O F P A V EM EN T EDGE OF PAVEMENT COVEREDCONCRETECONCRETE PADCONCRETE PADCOVEREDCONCRETECONCRETE PADCONCRETE PADCONCRETE PAD 6' WOOD FENCEEDGE OF PAVEMENTSTOP BAR (TYPICAL)LOT 14PB 2, PG 100CONCRETEWOODDOCKBRICKPAVERSWOODDOCKWOODDOCKWOODDOCKCONCRETE1 STORY BLOCK(C2)1 STORY BLOCK(C1)WOODDOCK3' VINYL FENCEBRICKPAVERS12.3'x4.1' SHED6.9'x6.9' SHEDBRICKPAVERSCOVEREDBRICKPAVERS4' CHAIN LINK FENCE10' WOOD FENCE6' VINYL FENCE POOLGATEGATECONCRETECONCRETECONCRETE STEPS (TYPICAL)CONCRETE BLOCK WALL (TYPICAL)COVERED CONCRETE COVERED CONCRETECOVEREDCONCRETECONCRETECOLUMN(TYPICAL)CONCRETE6' WOODFENCE4 ' W O O D F E N C E 8' WOOD FENCEE. LINE, LOT 12PB 2, PG 100W. LINE, LOT 12PB 2, PG 100SITE NO. 3PARCEL 4E. 238' LOT 22PB 1, PG 27E. 238' LOT 21PB 1, PG 27SITE NO. 5SITE NO. 3PARCEL 1, TOGETHER WITHVACATED 60' R/WORB 1965, PG 231130' R/W PERORB 2092, PG 44425'25'SITE NO. 5W. 25' VACATED R/WORB 2092, PG 444 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OFCONSERVATION EASEMENTORB 3250, PG 80719SD SDTOP=3.43E. INV=2.57S. INV=2.32SDO 6" PVC SDO6" PVCSDSDSD SDOSDO 15" RCP15" RCP15" RCP TOP=3.62W. INV=0.96SE INV=0.91TOP=4.39S. INV=1.59NW INV=1.46SD12" PVCSDOTOP=2.11W. INV=0.618" PVCINV=-0.46TOP=3.76BOTTOM=-0.76N63°39'46"W 83.80'CONCRETE PADCONCRETE PAD10.1'x8.9'1 STORY BLOCKPUMP HOUSEGAZEBOSTEPS12.1'21.9'9.9'13.1'8.8'2.2'SHED EϬϬΣϯϳΖϰϯΗtϱϳϬΖц EϴϵΣϯϳΖϰϭΗϭϯϭϲ͘ϵϮΖ0.2'W0.5'E0.5'W0.5'E20.1'INV=-1.82(30" RCP)CONCRETEHEAD WALL20.6'NORTH ROADVARIABLE WIDTH PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAYS. R/W LINE(BEARING BASIS)EEEEEEEETIRRIGATIONVALVEVIRRIGATIONVALVETTTIRRIGATIONVALVEEEELIFT STATION5.644.844.674.672.122.122.202.203.023.020.252.200.180.182.502.502.632.632.632.430.060.061.241.352.520.151.552.181.791.171.171.180.490.611.583.380.440.951.231.080.200.431.571.500.440.440.230.231.030.522.082.082.080.530.212.292.292.550.540.540.543.320.182.440.370.370.372.440.540.092.340.350.110.111.990.350.102.660.080.082.500.690.690.27TB TB TB TB TBTBTBTBTBTBIRRIGATIONVALVEVTTTTTTTTWOODDOCKWOODDOCKWOODDOCKHEADWALLCOVEREDBOAT SLIPCOVEREDBOAT SLIPCOVEREDBOAT SLIPWOODDOCKWOODDOCKWOODDOCKWOODDOCKWOODDOCKWOODDOCKLOT18NAPLES GROVES AND TRUCK CO'SLITTLE FARMS NO. 2PB 1, PG 27MEAN HIGH WATERELEVATION=0.3'ROCK CREEKROCK CREEK 50' ROAD PERPB 1, PG 27E. 1/2 OF ROAD REPLATTED INTOLOTS PER BP 2, PG 100 VACATED 25' R/WORB 2092, PG 444 R/W PERPB 1, PG 2730' R/WPB 2, PG 100N. LINE, LOT 18PB 1, PG 27S00°37'53"E 44.29'WOODDOCK30' R/WPB 2, PG 100WES T E R L YWESTERLYWESTERLYWESTERLYWESTERLYWESTERLYWESTERLYWESTERLYW. LINE, LOT 14PB 2, PG 100EϬϬΣϯϳΖϰϯΗtMEAN HIGH WATERELEVATION=0.3'W. LINE, E. 238', LOT 22PB 1, PG 27S. R/W LINEORB 2092, PG 444EϴϵΣϯϳΖϰϭΗϮϲϯ͘ϭϰΖ10' BUILDING SETBACK LINE10' BUILDING SETBACK LINE10' BUILDING SETBACK LINE5' BUILDING SETBACK LINE AB10.2'C0.6'SAPPROXIMATE CENTERLINEROCK CREEKBM #1SHEET 4 OF 5SCALE : 1" = 0'20'40'80'40'LEGEND OF SYMBOLS & ABBREVIATIONS TVT(R)(M)POWER POLELIGHT POLEGUY WIREELECTRIC MANHOLEELECTRIC METERELECTRIC VAULTTRANSFORMERAIR CONDITIONER UNITTELEPHONE MANHOLETELEPHONE PEDESTALCABLE BOXSTORM DRAIN MANHOLESTORM DRAIN INLETSTORM PIPEGREASE TRAPTRAFFIC SIGNAL BOXSIGNAL LIGHT POLESIGNAL LIGHTVAULTSIGN (AS NOTED)TOWERMONITORING WELLFLAG POLEWATER VALVEFIRE HYDRANTSIAMESE FIRE HYDRANTWATER MANHOLEBACKFLOW PREVENTERWATER METERWELL HEADPOINT OF ACCESSEVOLPGO.R.SDSOHEGASWATER LINESTORM DRAIN LINESEWER LINEUNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINEGAS LINEOVERHEAD WIRESWW(P)P.B.F.D.O.T.SANITARY MANHOLE CLEAN OUT GAS MANHOLEGAS VALVE GAS METER HANDICAPPED PARKINGMITERED END SECTIONBENCHMARKRECORD MEASURED PLATVOLUMEPAGEOFFICIAL RECORDSPLAT BOOKFLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION(D)DESCRIPTIONMATCH LINE - SHEET 3 OF 3 TBTOP OF BANK910 Belle Avenue, Suite 1100Casselberry, FL 32708Phone: 407-677-0200Licensed Business No. 7833www.altamaxsurveying.comAltamax SurveyingJames@altamaxsurveying.comPage 334 of 590 LOT 1BLOCK "H"PB 1, PG 40LOT 2BLOCK "H"PB 1, PG 40LOT 3BLOCK "H"PB 1, PG 40LOT 4BLOCK "H"PB 1, PG 40LOT 5BLOCK "H"PB 1, PG 40LOT 1BLOCK "G"PB 1, PG 40LOT 3BLOCK "G"PB 1, PG 40LOT 5BLOCK "G"PB 1, PG 40LOT 6BLOCK "G"PB 1, PG 40BURNHAM BOULEVARD (60' VACATED R/W) PB 1, PG 40ROCK CREEK DRIVE (60 ' VACATED R/W )(VACATED BY RESOLUT ION DATED APR IL 4 , 1950 )PB 1 , PG 40LOT 6BLOCK "F"PB 1, PG 40LOT 5BLOCK "F"PB 1, PG 40LOT 4BLOCK "F"PB 1, PG 40LOT 3BLOCK "F"PB 1, PG 40LOT 1BLOCK "F"PB 1, PG 40LOT 2BLOCK "F"PB 1, PG 40SITE NO. 1 (LESS W. 100')SITE NO. 1 (TOGETHER WITH W'LY 100')PARCEL IIW'LY, 100', BLOCK'S "F", "G" & "H"ORB 3474, PG 2610 N'LY SHORE ROCK CREEKAS SHOWN ON PB 1, PG 40MEAN HIGH WATER LINE, ROCK CREEKS'LY BOUNDARY FOR LESS OUTP.O.CSITE NO. 1(LESS AND EXCEPT)SITE NO. 2NW CORNERPB 1, PG 40W. LINE, PB 1, PG 40P.O.BSITE NO. 1(LESS AND EXCEPT)SITE NO. 2EXCEPTING NORTH 30'NO DOCUMENTATIONAPPROXIMATE CENTERLINEROCK CREEKROCK CREEK TERRACEPB 1, PG 40LOT 5PB 2, PG 100LOT 9PB 2, PG 100LOT 8PB 2, PG 100LOT 7PB 2, PG 100LOT 6PB 2, PG 100LOT18NAPLES GROVES AND TRUCK CO'SLITTLE FARMS NO. 2PB 1, PG 27SITE NO. 1SITE NO. 2SITE NO. 1(LESS AND EXCEPT)TRACT 1MERIDIAN VILLAGE PHASE 2PB 55, PG 94TRACT 2MERIDIAN VILLAGE PHASE 2PB 55, PG 94S00°43'45"E 224.00'S00°43'45"E N89°16'15"E 120.00'S00°43'45"ESITE NO. 3PARCEL 1, TOGETHER WITHVACATED 60' R/WE. OF E'LY LINE, LOT 11ORB 984, PG 221ORB 1965, PG 2311SITE NO. 3PARCEL 1, TOGETHER WITHVACATED 60' R/WBETWEEN LOTS 5 & 15ORB 984, PG 221ORB 1965, PG 2311N. LINE, LOT 18PB 1, PG 27TB TB TB TB TBTBTB TB TB TB TB TB TB TBTBTB TB TBTBTBTBTBTBTBT B TB T B T B T B TBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBT B TB TB TBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTB TB TB TB TBTB TB TB TB TB TB TB15'15.1'17.1'17'1 STORY BLOCKMAINTENANCEHEIGHT=12.1'±14.4'53'39.7'12.1'62.7'9.7'21.8'8'8'0.4'3.4'1 STORY BLOCKAND FRAME(OFFICE)HEIGHT=12.3'±75.1'50'12.9'22.2'4.1'8.4'5.8'1 STORY BLOCKCLUB HOUSEHEIGHT=18.3'±WOODSHEDEEEOH OHOHOHOHOHOHOHOH FOUND 3"x3" CONCRETE MONUMENTNO #FOUND NAIL AND DISKLB #43(0.21'S, 0.76'E)EDGE OF PAVEMENTEDGE OF PAVEMENTEDGE OF PAVEMENTEDGE OF PAVEMENT ASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALT ASPHALTASPHALTASPHALT ASPHALT ASPHALT ASPHALT ASPHALTASPHALTEDGE OF PAVEMENTEDGE OF PAVEMENT CONCRETE PADCONCRETE PADCONCRETE PAD 6' WOOD FENCEEDGE OF PAVEMENTCONCRETE PADCONCRETE PADBRICKPAVERSBRICKPAVERSSTOP BAR (TYPICAL)STOP BAR (TYPICAL)2' CONCRETE CURB & GUTTERLOT 4BLOCK "G"PB 1, PG 40LOT 2BLOCK "G"PB 1, PG 40TB TBCONCRETE BLOCKWALL (TYPICAL)POOLFOUNTAIN GATEGATECONCRETECONCRETECONCRETESTEPS (TYPICAL)CONCRETE BLOCKWALL (TYPICAL)COVEREDCONCRETECOVERED CONCRETECOVEREDCONCRETECONCRETECOLUMN(TYPICAL)CONCRETE6' WOODFENCE4' WOODFENCE 4' WIREFENCE6' WOODFENCELSATOP=3.76BOTTOM=-0.76SDINV=0.99TOP=2.49N. INV=1.01S. INV=0.996" PVC SDOSD12" PVCTOP=2.81SE INV=1.71SDOINV=0.13(8" PVC)INV=0.86(8" PVC)4' WOOD FENCEBRICKPAVERS4' WOOD FENCE4' WOOD FENCEBOLLARD (TYPICAL)CONCRETEHEAD WALLCONCRETEHEAD WALLCONCRETEHEAD WALLCONCRETEHEAD WALL4' WOOD FENCE4' WOOD FENCEINV=-2.27(42" RCP)INV=-2.50(42" RCP)INV=-2.62(42" RCP)CONCRETE WALKCONCRETE WALK CONCRETEBLOCK WALLFOUNTAINBRICKPAVERSCONCRETEWALK4' VINYL FENCECONCRETE PADGUARD RAILPEDESTRIAN SIGNAL POLEFIBER OPTIC CABLE BOXSIGN42.3'34.5'7.3'6'33.1'30.2'60.2'6.2'CONCRETEPADCOVEREDCONCRETECOVEREDCONCRETE 12'x4.7'WOOD SHEDCONCRETECONCRETE PAD2 STORYFRAMEHEIGHT=13.4'±BRICKPAVERSCONCRETE PADCONCRETE PAD10.1'x8.9'1 STORY BLOCKPUMP HOUSEEϴϵΣϯϳΖϰϭΗϭϯϭϲ͘ϵϮΖ^ϬϬΣϯϬΖϭϭΗϮϲΖц20.6' 19.1'2.4'7.9'NORTH ROADVARIABLE WIDTH PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAYS. R/W LINE(BEARING BASIS)EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEVIRRIGATIONVALVETIRRIGATIONVALVEELIFT STATIONTELIFT STATION5.642.172.205.153.933.921.841.842.032.032.392.392.392.392.392.392.392.392.392.392.292.292.292.822.042.042.042.042.042.042.044.844.844.674.672.122.122.202.203.023.020.252.200.180.182.502.502.632.632.632.430.060.061.55TEEEEEETWOODDOCKCOVEREDBOAT SLIPCOVEREDBOAT SLIPCOVEREDBOAT SLIPWOODDOCKWOODDOCKWOODDOCKWOODDOCKWOODDOCKWOODDOCK1.630.74INV=0.74INV=1.6312" PVCCONCRETE PADMEAN HIGH WATERELEVATION=0.3'AIRPORT-PULLING ROAD VARIABLE WIDTH PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAYROCK CREEKROCK CREEK30' R/WPB 2, PG 100E. LINE, BLOCK "H"PB 1, PG 40W E S T E R L YWE S T E R L YWESTERLYE. LINE, LOT 5PB 2, PG 100^ϬϬΣϰϯΖϰϬΗWESTERLYWESTERLY 10' BUILDING SETBACK LINE10' BUILDING SETBACK LINE5' BUILDING SETBACK LINE10' BUILDING SETBACK LINE10' INGRESS/EGRESSORB 3474, PG 2610ORB 5571, PG 385B10.2'C0.6'SD17.1'2.7'26.9'EPEPCONC CURBPAVERSEPEPCONCMEDIANBM #1BM #2SITE BENCHMARK #ELEVATION = DATUM = NAVD 881BM N&D4.65SITE BENCHMARK #ELEVATION = DATUM = NAVD 882BM N&D3.68SCALE : 1" = 0'20'40'80'40'SHEET 5 OF 5LEGEND OF SYMBOLS & ABBREVIATIONS TVT(R)(M)POWER POLELIGHT POLEGUY WIREELECTRIC MANHOLEELECTRIC METERELECTRIC VAULTTRANSFORMERAIR CONDITIONER UNITTELEPHONE MANHOLETELEPHONE PEDESTALCABLE BOXSTORM DRAIN MANHOLESTORM DRAIN INLETSTORM PIPEGREASE TRAPTRAFFIC SIGNAL BOXSIGNAL LIGHT POLESIGNAL LIGHTVAULTSIGN (AS NOTED)TOWERMONITORING WELLFLAG POLEWATER VALVEFIRE HYDRANTSIAMESE FIRE HYDRANTWATER MANHOLEBACKFLOW PREVENTERWATER METERWELL HEADPOINT OF ACCESSEVOLPGO.R.SDSOHEGASWATER LINESTORM DRAIN LINESEWER LINEUNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINEGAS LINEOVERHEAD WIRESWW(P)P.B.F.D.O.T.SANITARY MANHOLE CLEAN OUT GAS MANHOLEGAS VALVE GAS METER HANDICAPPED PARKINGMITERED END SECTIONBENCHMARKRECORD MEASURED PLATVOLUMEPAGEOFFICIAL RECORDSPLAT BOOKFLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION(D)DESCRIPTIONMATCH LINE - SHEET 2 OF 3 TBTOP OF BANK910 Belle Avenue, Suite 1100Casselberry, FL 32708Phone: 407-677-0200Licensed Business No. 7833www.altamaxsurveying.comAltamax SurveyingJames@altamaxsurveying.comPage 335 of 590 APPROXIMATE CENTERLINEROCK CREEKC.W. HUDDLESTON'S SUBDIVISIONPB 2, PG 100LOT 15PB 2, PG 100LOT 5PB 2, PG 100LOT 13PB 2, PG 100LOT 12PB 2, PG 100LOT 11PB 2, PG 100LOT 10PB 2, PG 100LOT 9PB 2, PG 100LOT 8PB 2, PG 100LOT 7PB 2, PG 100LOT 6PB 2, PG 100LOT 20NAPLES GROVES AND TRUCK CO'SLITTLE FARMS NO. 2PB 1, PG 27LOT 19NAPLES GROVES AND TRUCK CO'SLITTLE FARMS NO. 2PB 1, PG 27LOT18NAPLES GROVES AND TRUCK CO'SLITTLE FARMS NO. 2PB 1, PG 27PARCEL 1ORB 3365, PG 2406E 60', LOTS 21 & 22LESS N 248.47'LANDS DESCRIBEDORB 3471, PG 1463SITE NO. 3PARCEL 1E. LINE, LOT 11 PB 2, PG 100 E. LINE, LOT 12PB 2, PG 100SITE NO. 3PARCEL 1, TOGETHER WITHVACATED 60' R/WE. OF E'LY LINE, LOT 11ORB 984, PG 221ORB 1965, PG 2311SITE NO. 3PARCEL 1SITE NO. 3 PARCEL 1, TOGETHER WITH VACATED 60' R/W BETWEEN LOTS 5 & 15 ORB 984, PG 221 ORB 1965, PG 2311SITE NO. 3PARCEL 1, TOGETHER WITHVACATED 60' R/WW'LY. OF E'LY LINE, LOT 11ORB 1965, PG 2311SITE NO. 3PARCEL 3(CROSS HATCHED)SITE NO. 3PARCEL 4 (LESS)DB 665, PG 1935N. LINE, LOT 18PB 1, PG 27P.O.C.SITE NO. 3PARCEL 4NW CORNER, LOT 18PB 1, PG 27N89°37'11"E 183.16'P.O.B.SITE NO. 3PARCEL 4N89°37'11"E170.68'S77°31 '00"W36.72 'N76°59'03"W 61.79'LOT 21NAPLES GROVES AND TRUCK CO'SLITTLE FARMS NO. 2PB 1, PG 27LOT 22NAPLES GROVES AND TRUCK CO'SLITTLE FARMS NO. 2PB 1, PG 27E. 60', LOT 21PB 1, PG 27E. 60', LOT 22PB 1, PG 27SITE NO. 4SITE NO. 5(LESS)SITE NO. 4LESS N. 248.47'TBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTB TB TB TB T BTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTB TB TBTBTBTBTB TB TB TBTB TB TB TB TB 15'15.1'17.1'17'1 STORY BLOCKMAINTENANCEHEIGHT=12.1'±36'18.1'31'27'1 STORY BLOCK(C2)WOODDECK75.1'50'12.9'8.4'1 STORY BLOCKCLUB HOUSEHEIGHT=18.3'±EEOHOHOHOHOHOHFOUND 3"x3"CONCRETE MONUMENTNO #ALSOFND 1" IRON PIPENO #(0.41'N, 0.08'E)FOUND 5/8" CAPPED IRON ROADILLEGIBLE(0.42'S, 1.04'W)P.O.B(AS SURVEYED METES AND BOUNDS)NW CORNER, LOT 15PB 2, PG 100FOUND NAIL AND DISKILLEGIBLEWOODDOCKTBCAMERA POLEEDGE OF PAVEMENTEDGE OF PAVEMENTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALT ASPHALT ASPHALT AS P H A L T ASPHALT ASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTEDGE OF PAVEMENTEDGE OF PAVEMENTEDGE OF PAVEMENTEDGE OF PAVEMENTEDGE OF PAVEMENT EDGE OF PAVEMENT COVEREDCONCRETECONCRETE PADCONCRETE PADCOVEREDCONCRETECONCRETE PADCONCRETE PADCONCRETE PAD 6' WOOD FENCEEDGE OF PAVEMENTSTOP BAR (TYPICAL)LOT 14PB 2, PG 100CONCRETEWOODDOCKBRICKPAVERSWOODDOCKWOODDOCKWOODDOCKCONCRETE1 STORY BLOCK(C2)1 STORY BLOCK(C1)WOODDOCK3' VINYL FENCEBRICKPAVERS12.3'x4.1' SHED6.9'x6.9' SHEDBRICKPAVERSCOVEREDBRICKPAVERS4' CHAIN LINK FENCE6' VINYL FENCE POOLGATEGATECONCRETECONCRETECONCRETE STEPS (TYPICAL)CONCRETE BLOCK WALL (TYPICAL)COVERED CONCRETE COVERED CONCRETECOVEREDCONCRETECONCRETECOLUMN(TYPICAL)CONCRETE6' WOODFENCE4' WOOD FENC E 8' WOOD FENCEE. LINE, LOT 12PB 2, PG 100W. LINE, LOT 12PB 2, PG 100SITE NO. 3PARCEL 4E. 238' LOT 22PB 1, PG 27PB 1, PG 27SITE NO. 5SITE NO. 3PARCEL 1, TOGETHER WITHVACATED 60' R/WORB 1965, PG 231125'25'SITE NO. 5W. 25' VACATED R/WORB 2092, PG 444 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OFCONSERVATION EASEMENTORB 3250, PG 80719SD SDTOP=3.43E. INV=2.57S. INV=2.32SDO 6" PVC SDO6" PVCSDSDSD SDOSDO 15" RCP15" RCP15" RCP TOP=3.62W. INV=0.96SE INV=0.91TOP=4.39S. INV=1.59NW INV=1.46SD12" PVCSDOTOP=2.11W. INV=0.618" PVCINV=-0.46TOP=3.76BOTTOM=-0.76N63°39'46"W 83.80'CONCRETE PADCONCRETE PAD10.1'x8.9'1 STORY BLOCKPUMP HOUSEGAZEBOSTEPS12.1'21.9'9.9'13.1'8.8'2.2'SHED EϬϬΣϯϳΖϰϯΗtϱϳϬΖц EϴϵΣϯϳΖϰϭΗϭϯϭϲ͘ϵϮΖ0.2'W0.5'E0.5'W0.5'E20.1'INV=-1.82(30" RCP)CONCRETEHEAD WALL20.6'NORTH ROADVARIABLE WIDTH PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAYS. R/W LINEEEEEEEEETVIRRIGATIONVALVETTTIRRIGATIONVALVEEEELIFT STATION5.644.844.674.672.122.122.202.203.023.020.252.200.180.182.502.502.632.632.632.430.060.061.241.352.520.151.552.181.791.171.171.180.490.611.583.380.440.951.231.080.200.431.571.500.440.440.230.231.030.522.082.082.080.530.212.292.292.550.540.540.543.320.182.440.370.370.372.440.540.092.340.350.110.111.990.350.102.660.080.082.500.690.690.27TB TB TB TB TBTBTBTBTBTBIRRIGATIONVALVEVTTTTTTTTWOODDOCKWOODDOCKWOODDOCKHEADWALLCOVEREDBOAT SLIPCOVEREDBOAT SLIPCOVEREDBOAT SLIPWOODDOCKWOODDOCKWOODDOCKWOODDOCKWOODDOCKWOODDOCKLOT18NAPLES GROVES AND TRUCK CO'SLITTLE FARMS NO. 2PB 1, PG 27MEAN HIGH WATERELEVATION=0.3'ROCK CREEKROCK CREEK 50' ROAD PERPB 1, PG 27E. 1/2 OF ROAD REPLATTED INTOLOTS PER BP 2, PG 100 VACATED 25' R/WORB 2092, PG 444 R/W PERPB 1, PG 2730' R/WPB 2, PG 100N. LINE, LOT 18PB 1, PG 27S00°37'53"E 44.29'WOODDOCK30' R/WPB 2, PG 100WES T E R L YWESTERLYWESTERLYWESTERLYWESTERLYWESTERLYWESTERLYWESTERLYW. LINE, LOT 14PB 2, PG 100EϬϬΣϯϳΖϰϯΗtMEAN HIGH WATERELEVATION=0.3'W. LINE, E. 238', LOT 22PB 1, PG 27EϴϵΣϯϳΖϰϭΗϮϲϯ͘ϭϰΖ10' BUILDING SETBACK LINE10' BUILDING SETBACK LINE5' BUILDING SETBACK LINE AB10.2'C0.6'SAPPROXIMATE CENTERLINEROCK CREEKBM #1MATCH LINE - SHEET 3 OF 3 LOT 1BLOCK "H"PB 1, PG 40LOT 2BLOCK "H"PB 1, PG 40LOT 3BLOCK "H"PB 1, PG 40LOT 4BLOCK "H"PB 1, PG 40LOT 5BLOCK "H"PB 1, PG 40LOT 1BLOCK "G"PB 1, PG 40LOT 3BLOCK "G"PB 1, PG 40LOT 5BLOCK "G"PB 1, PG 40LOT 6BLOCK "G"PB 1, PG 40BURNHAM BOULEVARD (60' VACATED R/W) PB 1, PG 40ROCK CREEK DR IVE (60 ' VACATED R/W )(VACATED BY RESOLUT ION DATED APR IL 4 , 1950 )PB 1 , PG 40LOT 6BLOCK "F"PB 1, PG 40LOT 5BLOCK "F"PB 1, PG 40LOT 4BLOCK "F"PB 1, PG 40LOT 3BLOCK "F"PB 1, PG 40LOT 1BLOCK "F"PB 1, PG 40LOT 2BLOCK "F"PB 1, PG 40SITE NO. 1 (LESS W. 100') SITE NO. 1 (TOGETHER WITH W'LY 100') PARCEL II W'LY, 100', BLOCK'S "F", "G" & "H" ORB 3474, PG 2610 N'LY SHORE ROCK CREEKAS SHOWN ON PB 1, PG 40MEAN HIGH WATER LINE, ROCK CREEKS'LY BOUNDARY FOR LESS OUTP.O.CSITE NO. 1(LESS AND EXCEPT)SITE NO. 2NW CORNERPB 1, PG 40W. LINE, PB 1, PG 40P.O.BSITE NO. 1(LESS AND EXCEPT)SITE NO. 2EXCEPTING NORTH 30'NO DOCUMENTATIONAPPROXIMATE CENTERLINEROCK CREEKROCK CREEK TERRACEPB 1, PG 40LOT 5PB 2, PG 100LOT 9PB 2, PG 100LOT 8PB 2, PG 100LOT 7PB 2, PG 100LOT 6PB 2, PG 100LOT18NAPLES GROVES AND TRUCK CO'SLITTLE FARMS NO. 2PB 1, PG 27SITE NO. 1SITE NO. 2SITE NO. 1(LESS AND EXCEPT)TRACT 2MERIDIAN VILLAGE PHASE 2PB 55, PG 94S00°43'45"E 224.00'S00°43'45"E N89°16'15"E 120.00'S00°43'45"ESITE NO. 3PARCEL 1, TOGETHER WITHVACATED 60' R/WE. OF E'LY LINE, LOT 11ORB 984, PG 221ORB 1965, PG 2311SITE NO. 3 PARCEL 1, TOGETHER WITH VACATED 60' R/W BETWEEN LOTS 5 & 15 ORB 984, PG 221 ORB 1965, PG 2311N. LINE, LOT 18PB 1, PG 27T B T B T B TBTBTBTB TB TB TB TB TB TBTBTB TB TBTBTBTBTBTBTBTB TB TBTB TB TBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTB TB TBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTB TB TB TBTB TB TB TB T B TB TB15'15.1'17.1'17'1 STORY BLOCKMAINTENANCEHEIGHT=12.1'±14.4'53'39.7'12.1'62.7'9.7'21.8'8'8'0.4'3.4'1 STORY BLOCKAND FRAME(OFFICE)HEIGHT=12.3'±75.1'50'12.9'22.2'4.1'8.4'5.8'1 STORY BLOCKCLUB HOUSEHEIGHT=18.3'±WOODSHEDEEEOH OH OHOHOHOHOHOHOHFOUND 3"x3" CONCRETE MONUMENTNO #FOUND NAIL AND DISKLB #43(0.21'S, 0.76'E)EDGE OF PAVEMENTEDGE OF PAVEMENTEDGE OF PAVEMENTEDGE OF PAVEMENT ASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTAS PHA L T ASPHALTASPHALT ASPHALT ASPHALT ASPHALT ASPHALT ASPHALTASPHALTEDGE OF PAVEMENTEDG E O F PAV EM EN T CONCRETE PADCONCRETE PADCONCRETE PAD 6' WOOD FENCEEDGE OF PAVEMENTCONCRETE PADCONCRETE PADBRICKPAVERSBRICKPAVERSSTOP BAR (TYPICAL)STOP BAR (TYPICAL)2' CONCRETE CURB & GUTTERLOT 4BLOCK "G"PB 1, PG 40LOT 2BLOCK "G"PB 1, PG 40TB TBCONCRETE BLOCKWALL (TYPICAL)POOLFOUNTAIN GATEGATECONCRETECONCRETECONCRETE STEPS (TYPICAL)CONCRETE BLOCK WALL (TYPICAL)COVERED CONCRETE COVERED CONCRETECOVEREDCONCRETECONCRETECOLUMN(TYPICAL)CONCRETE6' WOODFENCE4 ' WOOD F EN C E 4' WIREFENCE6' WOODFENCELSATOP=3.76BOTTOM=-0.76SD INV=0.99TOP=2.49N. INV=1.01S. INV=0.996" PVC SDOSD12" PVCTOP=2.81SE INV=1.71SDOINV=0.13(8" PVC)INV=0.86(8" PVC)4' WOOD FENCEBRICKPAVERS4' WOOD FENCE4' WOOD FENCEBOLLARD (TYPICAL)CONCRETEHEAD WALLCONCRETEHEAD WALLCONCRETEHEAD WALLCONCRETEHEAD WALL4' WOOD FENCE4' WOOD FENCEINV=-2.27(42" RCP)INV=-2.50(42" RCP)INV=-2.62(42" RCP)CONCRETE WALKCONCRETE WALK CONCRETEBLOCK WALLFOUNTAINBRICKPAVERSCONCRETEWALK4' VINYL FENCECONCRETE PADGUARD RAILPEDESTRIAN SIGNAL POLEFIBER OPTIC CABLE BOXSIGN42.3'34.5 '7.3 '6'33.1 '30.2'60.2 '6.2'CONCRETEPADCOVEREDCONCRETECOVERED CONCRETE 12'x4.7'WOOD SHEDCONCRETECONCRETE PAD2 STORYFRAMEHEIGHT=13.4'±BRICKPAVERSCONCRETE PADCONCRETE PAD10.1'x8.9'1 STORY BLOCKPUMP HOUSEEϴϵΣϯϳΖϰϭΗϭϯϭϲ͘ϵϮΖ^ϬϬΣϯϬΖϭϭΗϮϲΖц19.1'2.4'7.9'NORTH ROADVARIABLE WIDTH PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAYS. R/W LINE(BEARING BASIS)EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEVIRRIGATIONVALVETIRRIGATIONVALVEELIFT STATIONTELIFT STATION5.642.172.205.153.933.921.841.842.032.032.392.392.392.392.392.392.392.392.392.392.292.292.292.822.042.042.042.042.042.042.044.844.844.674.672.122.122.202.203.023.020.252.200.180.182.502.502.632.632.632.430.060.06TEEEEEETWOODDOCKCOVEREDBOAT SLIPCOVEREDBOAT SLIPCOVEREDBOAT SLIPWOODDOCKWOODDOCKWOODDOCKWOODDOCKWOODDOCKWOODDOCK1.630.74INV=0.74INV=1.6312" PVCCONCRETE PADMEAN HIGH WATERELEVATION=0.3'AIRPORT-PULLING ROAD VARIABLE WIDTH PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAYROCK CREEKROCK CREEK30' R/WPB 2, PG 100E. LINE, BLOCK "H"PB 1, PG 40W E S T E R L YWESTERLYWESTERLYE. LINE, LOT 5PB 2, PG 100^ϬϬΣϰϯΖϰϬΗWES T E R L YWESTERLY 10' BUILDING SETBACK LINE10' BUILDING SETBACK LINE5' BUILDING SETBACK LINE10' BUILDING SETBACK LINE10' INGRESS/EGRESSORB 3474, PG 2610ORB 5571, PG 385B10.2'C0.6'SD17.1'2.7'26.9'EPEPCONC CURBPAVERSEPEPCONCMEDIANBM #1BM #2SITE BENCHMARK #ELEVATION = DATUM = NAVD 881BM N&D4.65SITE BENCHMARK #ELEVATION = DATUM = NAVD 882BM N&D3.68MATCH LINE - SHEET 2 OF 3 Page 336 of 590 LOT 1BLOCK "H"PB 1, PG 40LOT 2BLOCK "H"PB 1, PG 40LOT 3BLOCK "H"PB 1, PG 40LOT 4BLOCK "H"PB 1, PG 40LOT 5BLOCK "H"PB 1, PG 40LOT 1BLOCK "G"PB 1, PG 40LOT 3BLOCK "G"PB 1, PG 40LOT 5BLOCK "G"PB 1, PG 40LOT 6BLOCK "G"PB 1, PG 40BURNHAM BOULEVARD (60' VACATED R/W)PB 1, PG 40ROCK CREEK DRIVE (60' VACATED R/W)(VACATED BY RESOLUTION DATED APRIL 4, 1950)PB 1, PG 40LOT 6BLOCK "F"PB 1, PG 40LOT 5BLOCK "F"PB 1, PG 40LOT 4BLOCK "F"PB 1, PG 40LOT 3BLOCK "F"PB 1, PG 40LOT 1BLOCK "F"PB 1, PG 40LOT 2BLOCK "F"PB 1, PG 40SITE NO. 1 (LESS W. 100')SITE NO. 1 (TOGETHER WITH W'LY 100')PARCEL IIW'LY, 100', BLOCK'S "F", "G" & "H"ORB 3474, PG 2610N'LY SHORE ROCK CREEKAS SHOWN ON PB 1, PG 40MEAN HIGH WATER LINE, ROCK CREEKS'LY BOUNDARY FOR LESS OUTP.O.CSITE NO. 1(LESS AND EXCEPT)SITE NO. 2NW CORNERPB 1, PG 40W. LINE, PB 1, PG 40P.O.BSITE NO. 1(LESS AND EXCEPT)SITE NO. 2EXCEPTING NORTH 30'NO DOCUMENTATIONAPPROXIMATE CENTERLINEROCK CREEKROCK CREEK TERRACEPB 1, PG 40LOT 5PB 2, PG 100LOT 9PB 2, PG 100LOT 8PB 2, PG 100LOT 7PB 2, PG 100LOT 6PB 2, PG 100LOT18NAPLES GROVES AND TRUCK CO'SLITTLE FARMS NO. 2PB 1, PG 27SITE NO. 1SITE NO. 2SITE NO. 1(LESS AND EXCEPT)TRACT 1MERIDIAN VILLAGE PHASE 2PB 55, PG 94TRACT 2MERIDIAN VILLAGE PHASE 2PB 55, PG 94S00°43'45"E 224.00'S00°43'45"E N89°16'15"E 120.00'S00°43'45"ESITE NO. 3PARCEL 1, TOGETHER WITHVACATED 60' R/WE. OF E'LY LINE, LOT 11ORB 984, PG 221ORB 1965, PG 2311SITE NO. 3PARCEL 1, TOGETHER WITHVACATED 60' R/WBETWEEN LOTS 5 & 15ORB 984, PG 221ORB 1965, PG 2311N. LINE, LOT 18PB 1, PG 27TB TB TB TB TBTBTB TB TB TB TB TB TB TB TB TB TB TBTBTBTBTBTBTBTB TB TB TB TB TBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTB TB TB TB TBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTB TB TB TB TBTB TB TB TB TB TB TB15'15.1'17.1'17'1 STORY BLOCKMAINTENANCEHEIGHT=12.1'±14.4'53'39.7'12.1'62.7'9.7'21.8'8'8'0.4'3.4'1 STORY BLOCKAND FRAME(OFFICE)HEIGHT=12.3'±75.1'50'12.9'22.2'4.1'8.4'5.8'1 STORY BLOCKCLUB HOUSEHEIGHT=18.3'±WOODSHEDEEEOH OHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHFOUND NAIL AND DISKLB #43(0.21'S, 0.76'E)EDGE OF PAVEMENTEDGE OF PAVEMENTEDGE OF PAVEMENT ASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALT ASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTEDGE OF PAVEMENTEDGE OF PAVEMENT CONCRETE PADCONCRETE PADCONCRETE PAD 6' WOOD FENCEEDGE OF PAVEMENTCONCRETE PADCONCRETE PADBRICKPAVERSBRICKPAVERSSTOP BAR (TYPICAL)STOP BAR (TYPICAL)LOT 4BLOCK "G"PB 1, PG 40LOT 2BLOCK "G"PB 1, PG 40TB TBCONCRETE BLOCKWALL (TYPICAL)POOLFOUNTAIN GATEGATECONCRETECONCRETECONCRETESTEPS (TYPICAL)CONCRETE BLOCKWALL (TYPICAL)COVEREDCONCRETECOVERED CONCRETECOVEREDCONCRETECONCRETECOLUMN(TYPICAL)CONCRETE6' WOODFENCE4' WOODFENCE 4' WIREFENCE6' WOODFENCELSATOP=3.76BOTTOM=-0.76SDINV=0.99TOP=2.49N. INV=1.01S. INV=0.996" PVC SDOSD12" PVCTOP=2.81SE INV=1.71SDOINV=0.13(8" PVC)INV=0.86(8" PVC)4' WOOD FENCEBRICKPAVERS4' WOOD FENCE4' WOOD FENCEBOLLARD (TYPICAL)CONCRETEHEAD WALLCONCRETEHEAD WALLCONCRETEHEAD WALLCONCRETEHEAD WALL4' WOOD FENCE4' WOOD FENCEINV=-2.27(42" RCP)INV=-2.50(42" RCP)INV=-2.62(42" RCP)CONCRETE WALKCONCRETE WALK CONCRETEBLOCK WALLFOUNTAINBRICKPAVERSCONCRETEWALK4' VINYL FENCEGUARD RAILSIGN42.3'34.5'7.3'6'33.1'30.2'60.2'6.2'CONCRETEPADCOVEREDCONCRETECOVEREDCONCRETE 12'x4.7'WOOD SHEDCONCRETECONCRETE PAD2 STORYFRAMEHEIGHT=13.4'±BRICKPAVERSCONCRETE PADCONCRETE PAD10.1'x8.9'1 STORY BLOCKPUMP HOUSEEϴϵΣϯϳΖϰϭΗϭϯϭϲ͘ϵϮΖ^ϬϬΣϯϬΖϭϭΗϮϲΖц20.6'19.1'2.4'7.9'NORTH ROADVARIABLE WIDTH PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAYS. R/W LINE(BEARING BASIS)EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEVIRRIGATIONVALVETIRRIGATIONVALVEELIFT STATIONTELIFT STATION5.642.172.205.153.933.921.841.842.032.032.392.392.392.392.392.392.392.392.392.392.292.292.292.822.042.042.042.042.042.042.044.844.844.674.672.122.122.202.203.023.020.252.200.180.182.502.502.632.632.632.430.060.061.55TEEEEEETWOODDOCKCOVEREDBOAT SLIPCOVEREDBOAT SLIPCOVEREDBOAT SLIPWOODDOCKWOODDOCKWOODDOCKWOODDOCKWOODDOCKWOODDOCK1.630.74INV=0.74INV=1.6312" PVCCONCRETE PADMEAN HIGH WATERELEVATION=0.3'AIRPORT-PULLING ROADVARIABLE WIDTH PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAYROCK CREEKROCK CREEK30' R/WPB 2, PG 100WESTERLYWESTERLYWESTERLYE. LINE, LOT 5PB 2, PG 100^ϬϬΣϰϯΖϰϬΗWESTERLYWESTERLY 10' BUILDING SETBACK LINE10' BUILDING SETBACK LINE5' BUILDING SETBACK LINE10' BUILDING SETBACK LINE10' INGRESS/EGRESSORB 3474, PG 2610ORB 5571, PG 385B10.2'C0.6'SD17.1'2.7'26.9'EPEPCONC CURBPAVERSEPEPCONCMEDIANBM #1BM #2SCALE : 1" = 0'20'40'80'40'SHEET 5 OF 5MATCH LINE - SHEET 2 OF 3910 Belle Avenue, Suite 1100Casselberry, FL 32708Phone: 407-677-0200Licensed Business No. 7833www.altamaxsurveying.comAltamax SurveyingJames@altamaxsurveying.comPage 337 of 590 Page 338 of 590 Page 339 of 590 Page 340 of 590 Page 341 of 590 Page 342 of 590 Page 343 of 590 Page 344 of 590 Page 345 of 590 Page 346 of 590 Page 347 of 590 Page 348 of 590 Page 349 of 590 1 NAME1 NAME2 NAME3 NAME4 NAME5 NAME6 LEGAL1 LEGAL2 LEGAL3 LEGAL4 FOLIO ADDRESSTYPE CITY OF NAPLES AIRPORT ATHRTY 160 AVIATION DR N NAPLES, FL 34104---3568 UNPLATTED LANDS N1/2 SEC 2 TWP 50 RNG 25 AND S1/2 SEC 35 TWP 49 RNG 25, LESS R/W, LESS LEASED PARCELS 20764680005 U COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 COCONUT CREEK UNIT 1 THAT POR-TION OF LOT 15 DESC AS FOLL:BEG SW CNR OF LOT 15 THENCE ALG E R/W LI N 0DEG 29'W 26430740008 U COMMERCIAL PRODUCTIONS LLC 6180 HIDDEN OAKS LN NAPLES, FL 34119---0 NAPLES VILLA BLK A LOTS 7-11 63500320007 U CPF LIVING COMMUNITIES II BEACH HOUSE LLC 980 N MICHIGAN AVE STE 1998 CHICAGO, IL 60611---0 MERIDIAN VILLAGE PHASE 2 TRACT 1 60090000128 U CPI ROCK CREEK OWNER LLC % THE CARLYLE GROUP 1001 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW WASHINGTON, DC 20004---0 2 50 25 SLY 100FT OF W 120FT OF VACATED BLKS F & G ROCK CREEK TERRACE VACATED IN DB 16 PG 288 00386760006 U CPI ROCK CREEK OWNER LLC % THE CARLYLE GROUP 1001 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW WASHINGTON, DC 20004---0 2 50 25 FORMALLY DESCRIBED AS BLKS F,G AND H ROCK CREEK TERRACE LESS SLY 100FT OF WLY 120FT 00386761351 U CPI ROCK CREEK OWNER LLC % THE CARLYLE GROUP 1001 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW WASHINGTON, DC 20004---0 C W HUDDLESTONS LOTS 5 THRU 15 AND VACATED CREEK AVENUE,VACATED RESOLUTION NO 94-470,AND WESTERLY 35FT OF LOT 50990040007 U FAYARD JR, AL'D 106 CAMERON DR GRETNA, LA 70056---7313 NAPLES VILLAS BLK A LOTS 1-3 ALL LESS E 125 FT OR 843 PG 1273 63500080004 U MERIDIAN VILLAGE PROPERY OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC 2670 HORSESHOE DR N STE 201 NAPLES, FL 34104---0 MERIDIAN VILLAGE PHASE 2 TRACT 2 60090000144 U Notice: This data belongs to the Collier County Property Appraiser's Office (CCPA). Therefore, the recipient agrees not to represent this data to anyone as other than CCPA provided data. The recipient may not transfer this data to others without consent from the CCPA. Petition: PL20220006266 | Buffer: 150' | Date: 11/13/2024 | Site Location: 00386761351 Copy of POList_150 Page 350 of 590 Page 351 of 590 Page 352 of 590 Page 353 of 590 Page 354 of 590 Page 355 of 590 12/12/2024 Item # 3.E ID# 2024-2151 PETITION NO. BD-PL20240006028 – 62 Dolphin Circle – Request for a 103-foot boat dock extension from the maximum permitted protrusion of 20 feet allowed by Section 5.03.06.E.1 of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) for waterways greater than 100 feet in width, to allow a boat docking facility protruding a total of 123 feet into a waterway that is 1,064± feet wide, pursuant to LDC Section 5.03.06.H. The subject property is located at 62 Dolphin Circle and is further described as Lot 92, Isles of Capri No. 1, in Section 31, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. (Coordinator: John Kelly, Planner III) (Commissioner District 1) ATTACHMENTS: 1. Staff Report 11212024 2. Attachment A - Site and Dock Plans 3. Attachment B - Specific Purpose Survey 4. Attachment C - Applicant's Backup 5. Attachment D - Sign Posting 11262024 Page 356 of 590 BD-PL20240006028 – 62 Dolphin Cir Page 1 of 8 November 20, 2024 STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FROM: ZONING DIVISION – ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: DECEMBER 12, 2024 SUBJECT: BD-PL20240006028, 62 DOLPHIN CIRCLE - BRUNO DOCK _________________________________________________________________________ PROPERTY OWNER/APPLICANT: AGENT: Francis M. Bruno Jeff Rogers 62 Dolphin Cir Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. Naples, FL 34113 3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104 REQUESTED ACTION: The petitioner requests a 103-foot boat dock extension from the maximum permitted protrusion of 20 feet allowed by Section 5.03.06.E.1 of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) for waterways 100 feet or greater in width to allow a new boat dock facility protruding a total of 123 feet into a waterway that is 1,064± feet wide, pursuant to LDC Section 5.03.06.H. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is located at 62 Dolphin Circle, also known as Lot 92, Isles of Capri No. 1, in Section 31, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. (See location map on the following page) PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The subject 0.18-acre property is located within a Residential-Single Family – 4 (RSF-4) zoning district and supports a single-family dwelling adjacent to Pompano Bay located within the Rookery Bay Aquatic Preserve. The petitioner desires to remove the existing dock and boathouse to allow for a new residential dock facility with two slips, each with a boatlift: one for a 30-foot vessel and the other for two Personal Watercraft (PWCs). The property has approximately 65 feet of rip-rap shoreline with scattered mangroves; therefore, 15-foot side setbacks are required. The requested 103-foot protrusion is necessary due to water depths and the inability to dredge within the preserve. Page 357 of 590 BD-PL20240006028 – 62 Dolphin Cir Page 2 of 8 November 20, 2024 Page 358 of 590 BD-PL20240006028 – 62 Dolphin Cir Page 3 of 8 November 20, 2024 SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: North: Single-family dwelling, Residential Single-Family-4 (RSF-4) zoning district East: Single-family dwelling, Residential Single-Family-4 (RSF-4) zoning district South: Pompano Bay, Rural-Agricultural zoning district with a Special Treatment Overlay (A-ST) West: Dolphin Circle (Right-of-Way) then a single-family dwelling, Residential Single- Family-4 (RSF-4) zoning district Aerial – Collier County GIS Page 359 of 590 BD-PL20240006028 – 62 Dolphin Cir Page 4 of 8 November 20, 2024 Aerial – Collier County GIS ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION: Environmental Planning Staff has reviewed this petition and has no objection to the granting of this request. The proposed docking facilities will be constructed waterward of the existing rip- rapped shoreline. The property contains mangroves and any impacts on the mangroves will require a permit from the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). The submerged resources survey provided by the applicant found no submerged resources in the area Exhibit sheet page 8 of 9 provides an aerial with a note stating that no seagrasses were observed within 200 feet. This project does not require an Environmental Advisory Council Board (EAC) review because this project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Chapter 2, Article VIII, Division 23, Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. Page 360 of 590 BD-PL20240006028 – 62 Dolphin Cir Page 5 of 8 November 20, 2024 STAFF ANALYSIS: In accordance with LDC Section 5.03.06.H., the Collier County Hearing Examiner shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny a dock facility extension request based on certain criteria. In order for the Hearing Examiner to approve this request, at least four of the five primary criteria and four of the six secondary criteria must be met: Primary Criteria: 1. Whether the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate in relation to the waterfront length, location, upland land use and zoning of the subject property. Consideration should be made of property on unbridged barrier islands, where vessels are the primary means of transportation to and from the property. (The number should be appropriate; typical single-family use should be no more than two slips; typical multi-family use should be one slip per dwelling unit; in the case of unbridged barrier island docks, additional slips may be appropriate.) Criterion met. The subject property is located within an RSF-4 zoning district and supports a single-family dwelling for which the LDC allows two boat slips. The proposed project consists of removing the existing dock and boathouse to allow for a new residential docking facility with two slips, each with a boatlift; one for a 30-foot vessel, and the other is 5.5 feet by 20 feet for two PWCs. 2. Whether the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the general length, type, and draft as that described in the petitioner’s application is unable to launch or moor at mean low tide (MLT). (The petitioner’s application and survey should establish that the water depth is too shallow to allow launching and mooring of the vessel(s) described without an extension.) Criterion met. The applicant’s agent states: “The proposed boat dock extension is necessary to extend out to sufficient water depths but is also limited by the State’s aquatic preserve rules on the allowed overall protrusion being limited to terminating at the -4’ MLW contour line, as the subject property is within the Rookery Bay Aquatic Preserve. Additionally, the aquatic preserve will not allow for any new dredging activities, which would limit the overall protrusion to reach sufficient water depths or create sufficient depths to reduce the overall proposed dock protrusion. Based on the owner’s vessel and existing on-site water depths the BDE is needed to reach sufficient depths as shown on the attached BDE exhibits.” Zoning staff concurs. 3. Whether the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation within an adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. (The facility should not intrude into any marked or charted navigable channel thus impeding vessel traffic in the channel.) Criterion met. The applicant’s agent states: “The proposed docking facility design is consistent with numerous other existing docking facilities along the subject and adjacent Page 361 of 590 BD-PL20240006028 – 62 Dolphin Cir Page 6 of 8 November 20, 2024 waterways. As proposed, the dock and boatlifts will not impact navigation within the subject waterway, nor will they alter the existing ingress/egress to both adjacent neighboring docks and the associated slips. There is no marked channel within Pompano Bay; therefore, the entire waterway provides safe navigation between the docking facilities, and no new impacts to navigation will result from the proposed project.” Zoning staff concurs. 4. Whether the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25 percent of the width of the waterway and whether a minimum of 50 percent of the waterway width between dock facilities on either side is maintained for navigability. (The facility should maintain the required percentages.) Criterion met. The approximate waterway width is 1,064 feet. The requested total dock protrusion is 123-feet which is 11.56 percent of the width of the waterway. The clear distance between the subject dock facility and that on the opposite shore is 941 feet. Therefore, 88.44 percent of the waterway is open for navigation. 5. Whether the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the facility would not interfere with the use of neighboring docks. (The facility should not interfere with the use of legally permitted neighboring docks.) Criterion met. The applicant’s agent states: “The proposed docking facility design and overall location will not interfere with the existing adjacent dock facilities. As proposed, the dock will be within the allowed buildable area by providing the required setbacks, and therefore, the views into the subject waterway by the adjacent property owners will not be impacted nor their access to their docks.” Zoning staff concurs that the existing boathouse is to be removed. Additionally, the adjoining property owner to the south provided a” Letter of Concurrence for Setback Waiver” as part of the applicant’s application to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), essentially acknowledging the subject dock facility without objection; see attachments. Secondary Criteria: 1. Whether there are special conditions not involving water depth related to the subject property or waterway which justify the proposed dimensions and location of the proposed dock facility. (There must be at least one special condition related to the property; these may include type of shoreline reinforcement, shoreline configuration, mangrove growth, or seagrass beds.) Criterion met. The applicant’s agent states: “The subject property is located within the Rookery Bay Aquatic Preserve, which has not been historically dredged within the proposed area of Pompano Bay. Due to this, the subject property shoreline would be considered a natural shoreline, consisting of riprap, scattered mangroves, and shallow water depths compared to most other adjacent waterways. Additionally, the aquatic preserve will not allow any dredging activities to occur; therefore, the dock must protrude further out to reach adequate water depths, which is limited to a -4’ MLW contour line Page 362 of 590 BD-PL20240006028 – 62 Dolphin Cir Page 7 of 8 November 20, 2024 due to aquatic preserve dock design rules.” Given the agent’s explanation of the State’s aquatic preserve rules, Zoning staff concurs. 2. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe access to the vessel for loading/unloading and routine maintenance, without the use of excessive deck area not directly related to these functions. (The facility should not use excessive deck area.) Criterion met. The applicant’s agent states: “The proposed docking facility has been fully minimized to the fullest extent possible and still provides deck area for routine maintenance, safe access as well as recreational activities like fishing plus storage for these activities the dock provides. The total over-water square footage is 899 square feet.” Zoning staff concurs. 3. For single-family dock facilities, whether the length of the vessel or vessels in combination described by the petitioner exceeds 50 percent of the subject property’s linear waterfront footage. (The applicable maximum percentage should be maintained.) Criterion not met. The proposed dock facility has been designed for mooring a 30-foot vessel and two 12-foot PWCs; thus, the vessels total 54 feet. The total shoreline at this location is 65 feet; therefore, the vessels will exceed the 50 percent threshold. 4. Whether the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view of neighboring property owners. (The facility should not have a major impact on the view of a neighboring property owner.) Criterion met. The applicant’s agent states: “The existing on-site conditions consist of a grandfathered docking facility with a boathouse, so both adjacent neighboring property owners are used to having a dock along the subject property shoreline. As proposed, the dock has been designed within the designated setbacks and is consistent with the other existing boat docks within the subject waterway, which are perpendicular to the shoreline in order to remain within the riparian area. Both adjacent properties have docking facilities as well, and it’s our opinion that there will be no new impacts on either adjacent property owner. Additionally, this is a boating community; therefore, docks are all part of the overall atmosphere in the community.” Absent evidence to the contrary, Zoning staff concurs. 5. Whether seagrass beds will be impacted by the proposed dock facility. (If seagrass beds are present, compliance with subsection 5.03.06(I) of the LDC must be demonstrated.) Criterion met. There is no seagrass beds present on the property nor the neighboring properties within 200-feet of the existing dock structure. Page 363 of 590 BD-PL20240006028 – 62 Dolphin Cir Page 8 of 8 November 20, 2024 6. Whether the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of subsection 5.03.06(E)(11) of this Code. (If applicable, compliance with section 5.03.06(E)(11) must be demonstrated.) Criterion is not applicable. Criterion not applicable. The provisions of the Collier County Manatee Protection Plan do not apply to single-family dock facilities except for those within the seawalled basin of Port of the Islands; the subject property is not located within Port of the Islands. Staff analysis finds this request complies with five of the five primary criteria. With respect to the six secondary criteria, one of the criteria is found to be not applicable; the request meets four of the remaining five secondary criteria. CONCURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS: There are no concurrent land use applications under review at the present time. APPEAL OF BOAT DOCK EXTENSION: As to any boat dock extension petition upon which the Hearing Examiner takes action, an aggrieved party may appeal such final action. Such appeal shall be filed per Section 2-88 of the Collier County Code of Ordinances within 30 days of the Decision by the Hearing Examiner. An aggrieved non-party may appeal a decision of the Hearing Examiner to the Circuit Court of Collier County within 30 days of the decision. In the event that the petition has been approved by the Hearing Examiner, the applicant shall be advised that he/she proceed with construction at his/her own risk during this 30-day period. Any construction work completed ahead of the approval authorization shall be at their own risk. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Based on the above findings, staff recommends that the Hearing Examiner APPROVE Petition BD-PL20240006028, to allow for the permitting and construction of the proposed dock facility as depicted within the plans contained in Attachment A. Attachments: A) Proposed Site and Dock Plans B) Specific Purpose Survey C) Applicant’s Backup; Application and Supporting Documents D) Public Hearing Sign Posting Page 364 of 590 STATE OF FLORIDACOUNTY AERIAL VICINITY MAPSTATE OF FLORIDACOUNTY AERIAL VICINITY MAPNOTES:<> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SUBJECTPROPERTYSUBJECTPROPERTY<> LATITUDE:N 25.978921<> LONGITUDE:W -81.734137SITE ADDRESS:<> 62 DOLPHIN CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34113Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\23106.00 imperial master file\23106.01 62 dolphin circle\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\23106-BDE.dwg LOCATION MAP 9/16/2024THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ09-16-2423106-312662 DOLPHIN CIRCLELOCATION MAP51-------------------01 OF 09COLLIER COUNTYCOLLIER COUNTYGULF OF MEXICOGULF OF MEXICO8588288641MARCOISLANDEVERGLADESCITY9329846NAPLES90908399483783784129292983983992887846951862I-758486431856850846890896NESWKEY WESTTAMPAFT.MYERSMIAMINAPLESSUBJECTPROPERTYPage 365 of 590 0.0-1.2-3.0-2.3-2.3-3.1-4.9-4.1-2.9-2.4-2.3-2.0-2.4-3.3-3.1-2.9-1.4-0.5-0.8-1.7-3.2-2.4-3.0-2.9-2.9-3.1-3.1-2.9-2.2-2.4-1.7-2.3-1.5-2.4-2.1-2.4-3.2-4.1-4.1-4.1-4.1-4.1-4.1-2.7-2.7-3.2-3.1-2.9-2.5-2.5-3.4-3.3-1.9-1.8-1.6-1.8-1.6-1.3-1.8-1.6-2.6-2.2-2.0-2.8-2.1-2.1-2.9-1.4-1.3-0.1-0.9-1.5-2.0-2.5-2.7-2.5-2.2-2.4-2.4-2.0-1.7-0.7-0.1-0.30.0-0.7-0.7-0.3-1.6-1.5-0.5-1.7-0.4-1.9-2.1-2.3-2.4-2.5-2.8-2.4-2.3-2.2-5.7-2.3-2.2-2.2-2.5-2.2-2.5-2.3-2.4-1.9-1.8-2.4NESW0153060SCALE IN FEETSITE ADDRESS:,62 DOLPHIN CIRCLENAPLESFL34113Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\23106.00 imperial master file\23106.01 62 dolphin circle\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\23106-BDE.dwg EXISTING AERIAL 9/16/2024THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ09-16-2423106-312662 DOLPHIN CIRCLEEXISTING AERIAL51-------------------02 OF 09·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOTINTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.·ALL WATER DEPTHS AND DREDGE ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO MLW·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF):·EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX):·TIDAL DATUM:··MHW (NAVD)=··MLW (NAVD)=NOTES:"COURT GREGORY SURVEYING, INC."10-12-23-1.63'+0.43'65'6621,064'MANGROVEMANGROVEMHWLMLWLEXISTINGRIPRAPEXISTINGDOCK ANDBOATHOUSE131'65'140'65'-4 MLW CONTOURPROPERTYBOUNDARYORIGINALPLATTEDPROPERTYLINE21'30'66'Page 366 of 590 p:\23106.00 imperial master file\23106.01 62 dolphin circle\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\23106-BDE.dwg 9/16/2024NESW0102040SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\23106.00 imperial master file\23106.01 62 dolphin circle\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\23106-BDE.dwg PROPOSED DOCK - DIMENSIONS 9/16/2024THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ09-16-2423106-312662 DOLPHIN CIRCLEPROPOSED DOCK - DIMENSIONS51-------------------03 OF 09PILE COUNTTYPESIZEQUANTITYWOOD PILE10"21WOOD PILE12"8PILES IN WATER IMPACTS = 13 SF (QTY: 19)-4 MLW CONTOURRIPARIAN LINESETBACKRIPARIAN LINERIPARIAN LINESETBACKRIPARIAN LINEFIXED DOCK12'X12'BOAT LIFT123'MANGROVEMANGROVEPROPERTYBOUNDARY15'EXISTING ADJACENTDOCK AND LIFTSEXISTING ADJACENTDOCK AND LIFTS30'VESSEL25'98'MHWLMLWLEXISTINGRIPRAP65'6'TERMINALPLATFORM(120 SF)5'JET-SKI LIFT(5.5' X 20')AA0520'NOTES:<> NEW LIFTS TO BE INSTALLED, N.T.E. 32,000 LB·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOTINTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.·ALL WATER DEPTHS AND DREDGE ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO MLW·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF):·EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX):·TIDAL DATUM:··MHW (NAVD)=··MLW (NAVD)=NOTES:·PROPOSED OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·TOTAL OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM PROPERTY LINE:"COURT GREGORY SURVEYING, INC."10-12-23-1.63'+0.43'65'6621,064'508508123'ORIGINALPLATTEDPROPERTYLINEPage 367 of 590 0.0-1.2-3.0-2.3-2.3-3.1-4.9-4.1-2.9-2.4-2.3-2.0-2.4-3.3-3.1-2.9-1.4-0.5-0.8-1.7-3.2-2.4-3.0-2.9-2.9-3.1-3.1-2.9-2.2-2.4-1.7-2.3-1.5-2.4-2.1-2.4-3.2-4.1-4.1-4.1-4.1-4.1-4.1-2.7-2.7-3.2-3.1-2.9-2.5-2.5-3.4-3.3-1.9-1.8-1.6-1.8-1.6-1.3-1.8-1.6-2.6-2.2-2.0-2.8-2.1-2.1-2.9-1.4-1.3-0.1-0.9-1.5-2.0-2.5-2.7-2.5-2.2-2.4-2.4-2.0-1.7-0.7-0.1-0.30.0-0.7-0.7-0.3-1.6-1.5-0.5-1.7-0.4-1.9-2.1-2.3-2.4-2.5-2.8-2.4-2.3-2.2-5.7-2.3-2.2-2.2-2.5-2.2-2.5-2.3-2.4-1.9-1.8-2.4p:\23106.00 imperial master file\23106.01 62 dolphin circle\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\23106-BDE.dwg 9/16/2024NESW0102040SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\23106.00 imperial master file\23106.01 62 dolphin circle\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\23106-BDE.dwg PROPOSED DOCK - DEPTHS 9/16/2024THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ09-16-2423106-312662 DOLPHIN CIRCLEPROPOSED DOCK - DEPTHS51-------------------04 OF 09-4 MLW CONTOURRIPARIAN LINERIPARIAN LINESETBACKRIPARIAN LINEFIXED DOCK12'X12' BOATLIFTPROPERTYBOUNDARYEXISTING ADJACENTDOCK AND LIFTSEXISTING ADJACENTDOCK AND LIFTSRIPARIAN LINESETBACKJET-SKI LIFT(5.5' X 20')·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOTINTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.·ALL WATER DEPTHS AND DREDGE ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO MLW·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF):·EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX):·TIDAL DATUM:··MHW (NAVD)=··MLW (NAVD)=NOTES:·PROPOSED OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·TOTAL OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM PROPERTY LINE:"COURT GREGORY SURVEYING, INC."10-12-23-1.63'+0.43'65'6621,064'508508123'ORIGINALPLATTEDPROPERTYLINEPage 368 of 590 -2. 1 -2 . 5 -4 . 0 -2 . 5 -2 . 0 -0 . 7 -2 . 0 081530SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\23106.00 imperial master file\23106.01 62 dolphin circle\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\23106-BDE.dwg CROSS SECTION AA 9/16/2024THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ09-16-2423106-312662 DOLPHIN CIRCLECROSS SECTION AA51-------------------05 OF 09FIXEDDOCKALL PILES TO BE WRAPPEDFROM 12" ABOVE MHWL TO6" BELOW SUBSTRATE36"12'MLW = -1.63'NAVD88MHW = +0.43'NAVD8898' PROTRUSION FROM MHWL123' PROTRUSION FROM PROPERTY LINEPage 369 of 590 NESW0100200400SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\23106.00 imperial master file\23106.01 62 dolphin circle\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\23106-BDE.dwg ADJACENT DOCKS 9/16/2024THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ09-16-2423106-312662 DOLPHIN CIRCLEADJACENT DOCKS51-------------------06 OF 09PROPERTYBOUNDARYNOTE:THE DIMENSIONS SHOWN AREAPPROXIMATE AND ARE TAKENFROM THE AERIAL IMAGE.64 ' 32' 23' 48' 48' 48' 24' 20' 44' 55 ' 83 ' 96 '123'136'102'30' 2 0 ' 60' 55' 86' 68' 27'56'65'63'29'17'39'82'115'145'115'Page 370 of 590 NESW03060120SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\23106.00 imperial master file\23106.01 62 dolphin circle\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\23106-BDE.dwg ST OVERLAY 9/16/2024THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ09-16-2423106-312662 DOLPHIN CIRCLEST OVERLAY51-------------------07 OF 09PROPERTYBOUNDARYPROPOSEDDOCKSTOVERLAYPage 371 of 590 NESW0204080SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\23106.00 imperial master file\23106.01 62 dolphin circle\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\23106-BDE.dwg SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY 9/16/2024THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ09-16-2423106-312662 DOLPHIN CIRCLESUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY51-------------------08 OF 09TYPICAL DIVE TRANSECTNO SEAGRASSES WEREOBSERVED GROWINGWITHIN 200 FT OF THEPROPOSED PROJECTTRANSECTPROPERTYBOUNDARY200'200'10'Page 372 of 590 NESW0100200400SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\23106.00 imperial master file\23106.01 62 dolphin circle\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\23106-BDE.dwg WIDTH OF WATERWAY 9/16/2024THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ09-16-2423106-312662 DOLPHIN CIRCLEWIDTH OF WATERWAY51-------------------09 OF 09PROPERTYBOUNDARYPROPOSEDDOCK1064'1105'NOTE:THE DIMENSIONS SHOWN AREAPPROXIMATE AND ARE TAKENFROM THE AERIAL IMAGE.941'Page 373 of 590 09/09/2024Digitally signed by Court Gregory DN: cn=Court Gregory, o=Court Gregory Surveying Inc, ou, email=cgs6004@comcast.net, c=US Date: 2024.09.09 08:53:45 -04'00'Page 374 of 590 09/09/2024Digitally signed by Court Gregory DN: cn=Court Gregory, o=Court Gregory Surveying Inc, ou, email=cgs6004@comcast.net, c=US Date: 2024.09.09 08:54:26 -04'00'Page 375 of 590 Revised 5/18/2018 Provide to Agents G:\CDES Planning Services\Current\Zoning Staff Information\Job Aides or Help Guides HEARING PACKAGE CHECKLIST A.Backup provided by the County Planner The agent is responsible for all required data included in the digital file of information for the Hearing Examiner (Hex) or the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC). DO NOT ACCEPT DUPLICATES OF ANY DOCUMENTS. MAKE SURE ONLY THE LATEST, ACCEPTED/APPROVED COPY OF THE BELOW DOCUMENTATION. PLEASE CONFIRM THE DOCUMENTS ARE IN THE ORDER DESCRIBED IN “BACKUP PROVIDED BY APPLICANT.” Planner responsible for providing the County Attorney-drafted Ordinance for PUDs and placing in backup materials. AGENTS DO NOT INCLUDE THE PUD DOCUMENT – STAFF PROVIDES THIS TO THE COUNTY ATTORNEY WHEN THE ORDINANCE IS DRAFTED FOR A PUD. THE FINAL PUD ORDINANCE/RESOLUTION IS THE FIRST ITEM AFTER THE STAFF REPORT. [FOR HEX, THE REQUESTED LANGUAGE/ PROPOSED PLAN IS THE FIRST ITEM AFTER THE STAFF REPORT] B.Backup provided by Applicant: PLEASE PROVIDE THE DOCUMENTS IN THE ORDER DESCRIBED BELOW. DO NOT PROVIDE DUPLICATES OF ANY DOCUMENTS. PROVIDE ONLY THE LATEST, ACCEPTED/APPROVED COPY OF THE BELOW DOCUMENTATION. IF THE BACKUP PROVIDED BY APPLICANT IS IN DISARRAY-MEANING IT IS NOT IN THE PROPER ORDER AND/OR THE APPLICANT PROVIDES MULTIPLE DUPLICATES-THE APPLICANT COULD LOSE ITS HEARING DATE. _X__ Application, to include but not limited to the following: _ X__ Narrative of request _ X__ Property Information _ X__ Property Ownership Disclosure Form _ X__ Any other documents required by the specific petition type; such as a variance, a boat dock extension; PUD amendment, rezone request, etc. _ X__ Disclosure of Property Ownership Interest (if there is additional documentation aside from disclosure form) ____ Affidavit of Unified Control _ X__ Affidavit of Representation Authorization _ X__ Drawings (may include Cross-Section (for BDEs generally), proposed Boat Dock(s) with Water depth, location maps etc.) _ ___ NIM Information (Sign in sheet, notes, minutes and transcript/or summary) Include 3 thumbnail drives of video and/or audio Agent Letter Pkg. ____ Traffic Impact Study (TIS) ____ Environmental Data ____ Historical/Archeological Survey or Waiver ____ Utility Letter _ X__ Deviation Justifications BD-PL20240006028 - 62 Dolphin Cir Page 376 of 590 Revised 5/18/2018 Provide to Agents G:\CDES Planning Services\Current\Zoning Staff Information\Job Aides or Help Guides _ X__ Boundary Survey _ X__ Other documents, as needed, on a case-by-case basis such as relevant prior Ordinances, Conditional Uses, historical documents, any “private or legal” agreements affecting the PUD etc. _ X_ Submerged Resource Surveys may be included here if required. _ X __ flash drive with only one pdf file for all documents OR e-mailed .pdf file I understand that by submitting the above materials, it is the agent’s/applicant’s responsibility to ensure all materials are in the same order for flash drive must contain the documents in one pdf file. It is the agent’s responsibility to ensure no documentation is left out. ________________________________________ ____________________ Signature of Agent Representative Date ________________________________________ Printed Name of Signing Agent Representative 11/21/2024 Jeff Rogers Page 377 of 590 Page 378 of 590 Page 379 of 590 Page 380 of 590 Page 381 of 590 Page 382 of 590 Page 383 of 590 Page 384 of 590 Narrative Description: The proposed Boat Dock Extension request is to remove the existing dock and associated boathouse to then construct a new single-family docking facility with two boatlifts and a new boatlift canopy cover for the larger slip located at 62 Dolphin Circle on Isles of Capri. The subject waterway is considered Pompano Bay just off Johnson Bay along the north side of Isles of Capri. This section of Pompano Bay is considered state lands which also means in this case is located within the Rookery Bay Aquatic Preserve and therefore subject to the associated aquatic preserve dock rules. The subject property has approximately 65 linear feet of rip-rap shoreline which also has a few scattered mangroves and is naturally shallow due to limitations to dredge due to being within the aquatic preserve. Additionally, the subject platted property line is landward of the mean high-water line therefore is the most restrictive point and due to shoreline length, the required setbacks are 15-feet from each property riparian line. The proposed dock as designed will require a BDE to accommodate the applicant’s 30-foot LOA vessel as well as (2) PWC, both of which will be moored on boatlifts at the proposed docking facility. Due to the existing site conditions and being located within the aquatic preserve the proposed dock will protrude approximately 123-feet from the property line and therefore we are requesting a 103-foot extension over the allowed 20-feet. The reason for the proposed overall protrusion is due to shallow water depths which the applicant is not allowed to dredge being the subject waterway is classified as a natural waterway located within the aquatic preserve. Dredging is not permitted unless we are able to provide evidence of historic dredging activities that have occurred on-site which, based off our research and state records, have not previously occurred. Additionally, the subject waterway is approximately 1,064-feet wide and as proposed the dock and boat lifts would protrude 12% into the subject waterway. The subject waterway is an unmarked waterway and completely open to navigation therefore no impacts to navigation within the area will result from the proposed dock. The proposed dock will provide the required side yard setback being 15-feet from the south riparian line and 25-feet from the north riparian line as required for lots with 60-feet of shoreline or greater. There are no impacts to any submerged resources, the decking area has been minimized and still provides sufficient surface area for recreational activities, routine maintenance, and associated storage. Also, the proposed dock design and overall protrusion is consistent with the other previously approved docking facilities on the subject waterway as there are not many docks designs that are allowed due to the more restrictive aquatic preserve rules. Page 385 of 590 PRIMARY CRITERIA The following criteria, pursuant to LDC section 5.03.06, shall be used as a guide by staff in determining its recommendation to the Office of the Hearing Examiner. The Hearing Examiner will utilize the following criteria as a guide in the decision to approve or deny a particular Dock Extension request. In order for the Hearing Examiner to approve the request, it must be determined that at least 4 of the 5 primary criteria, and at least 4 of the 6 secondary criteria, must be met. On separate sheets, please provide a narrative response to the listed criteria and/or questions. 1. Whether or not the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate in relation to the waterfront length, location, upland land use, and zoning of the subject property; consideration should be made of property on unbridged barrier islands, where vessels are the primary means of transportation to and from the property. (The number should be appropriate; typical, single-family use should be no more than two slips; typical multi-family use should be one slip per dwelling unit; in the case of unbridged barrier island docks, additional slips may be appropriate.) The subject property is zoned for a single-family residential unit which warrants no more than 2 slips per the CC-LDC. The proposed docking facility consists of installing two boatlifts one to accommodate a 30-foot LOA vessel and the other is a 5.5’ x 20’ jet-ski lift for 2 PWC’s. The proposed dock will extend out 123-feet from the plated property line which is 103-feet of protrusion past the allowed 20-feet, therefore we are requesting for a 103-foot extension. Additionally, the proposed dock will provide and exceed the required 15-foot setbacks from both riparian lines and therefore will not interfere with the adjacent properties as the vessel’s ingress/egress the proposed boatlifts. As proposed the docking facility is appropriate for the typical single-family residential use. Criterion Met 2. Whether or not the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the general length, type, and draft as that described in the petitioner’s application is unable to launch or moor at mean low tide (MLT). (The petitioner’s application and survey should show that the water depth is too shallow to allow launch and mooring of the vessel (s) described without an extension.) The proposed boat dock extension is necessary to extend out to sufficient water depths but is also limited by the State’s aquatic preserve rules on the allowed overall protrusion being limited to terminating at the -4’ MLW contour line, as the subject property is within the Rookery Bay Aquatic Preserve. Additionally, the aquatic preserve will not allow for any new dredging activities which would limit the overall protrusion to reach sufficient water depths or create sufficient depths to reduce the overall proposed dock protrusion. Based on the owner’s vessel and existing on-site water depths the BDE is needed to reach sufficient depths as shown on the attached BDE exhibits. Page 386 of 590 Criterion Met 3. Whether or not the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation within an adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. (The facility should not intrude into any marked or charted navigable channel thus impeding vessel traffic in the channel.) The proposed docking facility design is consistent with numerous other existing docking facilities along the subject and adjacent waterways. As proposed the dock and boatlifts will not impact navigation within the subject waterway nor will it alter the existing ingress/egress to both adjacent neighboring docks and the associated slips. There is no marked channel within Pompano Bay therefore the entire waterway provides safe navigation between the docking facilities and no new impacts to any navigation will result from the proposed project. Criterion Met 4. Whether or not the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25 percent of the width of the waterway, and whether or not a minimum of 50 percent of the waterway width between dock facilities on either side of the waterway is maintained for navigability. (The facility should maintain the required percentages.) The approximate waterway width is 1,064-feet wide. The proposed dock protrusion is 123-feet which is under 12% width of the waterway. Criterion Met 5. Whether or not the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the facility would not interfere with the use of neighboring docks. (The facility should not interfere with the use of legally permitted neighboring docks.) The proposed docking facility design and overall location will not interfere with the existing adjacent docking facilities. As proposed the dock will be within the allowed buildable area by providing the required setbacks and therefore the views into the subject waterway by the adjacent property owners will not be impacted nor their access to their docks. Criterion Met Page 387 of 590 SECONDARY CRITERIA 1. Whether or not there are special conditions, not involving water depth, related to the subject property or waterway, which justify the proposed dimensions and location of the proposed dock facility. (There must be at least one special condition related to the property; these may include type of shoreline reinforcement, shoreline configuration, mangrove growth, or seagrass beds.) The subject property is located within the Rooker Bay Aquatic Preserve which has not been historically dredged within the proposed area of Pompano Bay. Due to this the subject property shoreline would be considered a natural shoreline which consist of rip-rap, some scattered mangroves and shallow water depths compared to most other adjacent waterways. Additionally, the aquatic preserve will not allow any dredging activities to occur therefore the dock must protrude further out to reach adequate water depths which is limited to -4’ MLW contour line due to aquatic preserve dock design rules. Criterion Met 2. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe, access to the vessel for loading/unloading and routine maintenance, without the use of excessive deck area not directly related to these functions. (The facility should not use excessive deck area.) The proposed docking facility has been minimized to the fullest extent possible and still provides deck area for routine maintenance, safe access as well as recreational activities like fishing plus storage for these activities the dock provides. The total over-water square footage is 899 square feet. Criterion Met 3. For single-family dock facilities, whether or not the length of the vessel, or vessels in combination, described by the petitioner exceeds 50 percent of the subject property’s linear waterfront footage. (The applicable maximum percentage should be maintained.) The existing docking facility has been designed to moor two vessels, one being approximately 30-feet in length and the other being 2 PWC’s. The subject property’s shoreline length is approximately 65-feet and therefore this criterion is not met. 4. Whether or not the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view of neighboring waterfront property owners. (The facility should not have a major impact on the view of either property owner.) The existing on-site conditions consist of a grandfathered docking facility with a boathouse, so both adjacent neighboring property owners are used to having a dock along the subject property shoreline. As proposed the dock has been designed within Page 388 of 590 the designated setbacks and is consistent with the other existing boat docks on the subject waterway. Both adjacent properties have docking facilities as well and it’s our opinion that there are no new impacts to either adjacent property owner. Additionally, this is a boating community therefore docks are all part of the overall atmosphere in this community. Criterion Met 5. Whether or not seagrass beds are located within 200 feet of the proposed dock facility. (If seagrass beds are present, compliance with LDC subsection 5.03.06 I must be demonstrated.) There are no seagrass beds present on the property nor the neighboring properties within 200’ of the existing dock structure. Criterion Met 6. Whether or not the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of LDC subsection 5.03.06 E.11. (If applicable, compliance with subsection 5.03.06.E.11 must be demonstrated.) The proposed work is a single-family dock facility and therefore not subject to Manatee Protection Requirements. N/A Page 389 of 590 Page 390 of 590 Page 391 of 590 Page 392 of 590 Page 393 of 590 STATE OF FLORIDACOUNTY AERIAL VICINITY MAPSTATE OF FLORIDACOUNTY AERIAL VICINITY MAPNOTES:<> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SUBJECTPROPERTYSUBJECTPROPERTY<> LATITUDE:N 25.978921<> LONGITUDE:W -81.734137SITE ADDRESS:<> 62 DOLPHIN CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34113Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\23106.00 imperial master file\23106.01 62 dolphin circle\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\23106-BDE.dwg LOCATION MAP 9/16/2024THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ09-16-2423106-312662 DOLPHIN CIRCLELOCATION MAP51-------------------01 OF 09COLLIER COUNTYCOLLIER COUNTYGULF OF MEXICOGULF OF MEXICO8588288641MARCOISLANDEVERGLADESCITY9329846NAPLES90908399483783784129292983983992887846951862I-758486431856850846890896NESWKEY WESTTAMPAFT.MYERSMIAMINAPLESSUBJECTPROPERTYPage 394 of 590 0.0-1.2-3.0-2.3-2.3-3.1-4.9-4.1-2.9-2.4-2.3-2.0-2.4-3.3-3.1-2.9-1.4-0.5-0.8-1.7-3.2-2.4-3.0-2.9-2.9-3.1-3.1-2.9-2.2-2.4-1.7-2.3-1.5-2.4-2.1-2.4-3.2-4.1-4.1-4.1-4.1-4.1-4.1-2.7-2.7-3.2-3.1-2.9-2.5-2.5-3.4-3.3-1.9-1.8-1.6-1.8-1.6-1.3-1.8-1.6-2.6-2.2-2.0-2.8-2.1-2.1-2.9-1.4-1.3-0.1-0.9-1.5-2.0-2.5-2.7-2.5-2.2-2.4-2.4-2.0-1.7-0.7-0.1-0.30.0-0.7-0.7-0.3-1.6-1.5-0.5-1.7-0.4-1.9-2.1-2.3-2.4-2.5-2.8-2.4-2.3-2.2-5.7-2.3-2.2-2.2-2.5-2.2-2.5-2.3-2.4-1.9-1.8-2.4NESW0153060SCALE IN FEETSITE ADDRESS:,62 DOLPHIN CIRCLENAPLESFL34113Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\23106.00 imperial master file\23106.01 62 dolphin circle\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\23106-BDE.dwg EXISTING AERIAL 9/16/2024THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ09-16-2423106-312662 DOLPHIN CIRCLEEXISTING AERIAL51-------------------02 OF 09·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOTINTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.·ALL WATER DEPTHS AND DREDGE ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO MLW·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF):·EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX):·TIDAL DATUM:··MHW (NAVD)=··MLW (NAVD)=NOTES:"COURT GREGORY SURVEYING, INC."10-12-23-1.63'+0.43'65'6621,064'MANGROVEMANGROVEMHWLMLWLEXISTINGRIPRAPEXISTINGDOCK ANDBOATHOUSE131'65'140'65'-4 MLW CONTOURPROPERTYBOUNDARYORIGINALPLATTEDPROPERTYLINE21'30'66'Page 395 of 590 p:\23106.00 imperial master file\23106.01 62 dolphin circle\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\23106-BDE.dwg 9/16/2024NESW0102040SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\23106.00 imperial master file\23106.01 62 dolphin circle\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\23106-BDE.dwg PROPOSED DOCK - DIMENSIONS 9/16/2024THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ09-16-2423106-312662 DOLPHIN CIRCLEPROPOSED DOCK - DIMENSIONS51-------------------03 OF 09PILE COUNTTYPESIZEQUANTITYWOOD PILE10"21WOOD PILE12"8PILES IN WATER IMPACTS = 13 SF (QTY: 19)-4 MLW CONTOURRIPARIAN LINESETBACKRIPARIAN LINERIPARIAN LINESETBACKRIPARIAN LINEFIXED DOCK12'X12'BOAT LIFT123'MANGROVEMANGROVEPROPERTYBOUNDARY15'EXISTING ADJACENTDOCK AND LIFTSEXISTING ADJACENTDOCK AND LIFTS30'VESSEL25'98'MHWLMLWLEXISTINGRIPRAP65'6'TERMINALPLATFORM(120 SF)5'JET-SKI LIFT(5.5' X 20')AA0520'NOTES:<> NEW LIFTS TO BE INSTALLED, N.T.E. 32,000 LB·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOTINTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.·ALL WATER DEPTHS AND DREDGE ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO MLW·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF):·EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX):·TIDAL DATUM:··MHW (NAVD)=··MLW (NAVD)=NOTES:·PROPOSED OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·TOTAL OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM PROPERTY LINE:"COURT GREGORY SURVEYING, INC."10-12-23-1.63'+0.43'65'6621,064'508508123'ORIGINALPLATTEDPROPERTYLINEPage 396 of 590 0.0-1.2-3.0-2.3-2.3-3.1-4.9-4.1-2.9-2.4-2.3-2.0-2.4-3.3-3.1-2.9-1.4-0.5-0.8-1.7-3.2-2.4-3.0-2.9-2.9-3.1-3.1-2.9-2.2-2.4-1.7-2.3-1.5-2.4-2.1-2.4-3.2-4.1-4.1-4.1-4.1-4.1-4.1-2.7-2.7-3.2-3.1-2.9-2.5-2.5-3.4-3.3-1.9-1.8-1.6-1.8-1.6-1.3-1.8-1.6-2.6-2.2-2.0-2.8-2.1-2.1-2.9-1.4-1.3-0.1-0.9-1.5-2.0-2.5-2.7-2.5-2.2-2.4-2.4-2.0-1.7-0.7-0.1-0.30.0-0.7-0.7-0.3-1.6-1.5-0.5-1.7-0.4-1.9-2.1-2.3-2.4-2.5-2.8-2.4-2.3-2.2-5.7-2.3-2.2-2.2-2.5-2.2-2.5-2.3-2.4-1.9-1.8-2.4p:\23106.00 imperial master file\23106.01 62 dolphin circle\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\23106-BDE.dwg 9/16/2024NESW0102040SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\23106.00 imperial master file\23106.01 62 dolphin circle\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\23106-BDE.dwg PROPOSED DOCK - DEPTHS 9/16/2024THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ09-16-2423106-312662 DOLPHIN CIRCLEPROPOSED DOCK - DEPTHS51-------------------04 OF 09-4 MLW CONTOURRIPARIAN LINERIPARIAN LINESETBACKRIPARIAN LINEFIXED DOCK12'X12' BOATLIFTPROPERTYBOUNDARYEXISTING ADJACENTDOCK AND LIFTSEXISTING ADJACENTDOCK AND LIFTSRIPARIAN LINESETBACKJET-SKI LIFT(5.5' X 20')·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOTINTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.·ALL WATER DEPTHS AND DREDGE ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO MLW·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF):·EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX):·TIDAL DATUM:··MHW (NAVD)=··MLW (NAVD)=NOTES:·PROPOSED OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·TOTAL OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM PROPERTY LINE:"COURT GREGORY SURVEYING, INC."10-12-23-1.63'+0.43'65'6621,064'508508123'ORIGINALPLATTEDPROPERTYLINEPage 397 of 590 -2. 1 -2 . 5 -4 . 0 -2 . 5 -2 . 0 -0 . 7 -2 . 0 081530SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\23106.00 imperial master file\23106.01 62 dolphin circle\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\23106-BDE.dwg CROSS SECTION AA 9/16/2024THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ09-16-2423106-312662 DOLPHIN CIRCLECROSS SECTION AA51-------------------05 OF 09FIXEDDOCKALL PILES TO BE WRAPPEDFROM 12" ABOVE MHWL TO6" BELOW SUBSTRATE36"12'MLW = -1.63'NAVD88MHW = +0.43'NAVD8898' PROTRUSION FROM MHWL123' PROTRUSION FROM PROPERTY LINEPage 398 of 590 NESW0100200400SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\23106.00 imperial master file\23106.01 62 dolphin circle\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\23106-BDE.dwg ADJACENT DOCKS 9/16/2024THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ09-16-2423106-312662 DOLPHIN CIRCLEADJACENT DOCKS51-------------------06 OF 09PROPERTYBOUNDARYNOTE:THE DIMENSIONS SHOWN AREAPPROXIMATE AND ARE TAKENFROM THE AERIAL IMAGE.64 ' 32' 23' 48' 48' 48' 24' 20' 44' 55 ' 83 ' 96 '123'136'102'30' 2 0 ' 60' 55' 86' 68' 27'56'65'63'29'17'39'82'115'145'115'Page 399 of 590 NESW03060120SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\23106.00 imperial master file\23106.01 62 dolphin circle\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\23106-BDE.dwg ST OVERLAY 9/16/2024THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ09-16-2423106-312662 DOLPHIN CIRCLEST OVERLAY51-------------------07 OF 09PROPERTYBOUNDARYPROPOSEDDOCKSTOVERLAYPage 400 of 590 NESW0204080SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\23106.00 imperial master file\23106.01 62 dolphin circle\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\23106-BDE.dwg SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY 9/16/2024THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ09-16-2423106-312662 DOLPHIN CIRCLESUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY51-------------------08 OF 09TYPICAL DIVE TRANSECTNO SEAGRASSES WEREOBSERVED GROWINGWITHIN 200 FT OF THEPROPOSED PROJECTTRANSECTPROPERTYBOUNDARY200'200'10'Page 401 of 590 NESW0100200400SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\23106.00 imperial master file\23106.01 62 dolphin circle\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\23106-BDE.dwg WIDTH OF WATERWAY 9/16/2024THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ09-16-2423106-312662 DOLPHIN CIRCLEWIDTH OF WATERWAY51-------------------09 OF 09PROPERTYBOUNDARYPROPOSEDDOCK1064'1105'NOTE:THE DIMENSIONS SHOWN AREAPPROXIMATE AND ARE TAKENFROM THE AERIAL IMAGE.941'Page 402 of 590 62 DOLPHIN CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34113 FOLIO #52343480005 SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY REPORT MAY 2024 PREPARED BY: Page 403 of 590 Table of Contents 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Objective ............................................................................................................................................. 2 3 Methodology ...................................................................................................................................... 3 4 Results ................................................................................................................................................. 4 5 Conclusion .......................................................................................................................................... 5 6 Photos .................................................................................................................................................. 6 Page 404 of 590 62 Dolphin Circle Submerged Resource Survey May 2024 1 1 INTRODUCTION Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. (THA) has been contracted to provide environmental permitting services for the proposed dock which includes completing an onsite Submerged Resource Survey (SRS) at the subject property located at 62 Dolphin Circle in Isles of Capri, FL 34113. The subject property can be identified by folio #52343480005. This resource survey provides planning assistance to avoid any potential impacts to submerged resources located in and around the proposed project to both the property owner and regulating agencies during the review process for the proposed docking facility. The subject property consists of a 0.18-acre single-family parcel that can be found on the southwestern side of Isle of Capri just off Johnson Bay/Capri Pass. The subject waterway is considered a natural waterway that is located within the Rookery Bay Aquatic Preserve which connects directly to the Gulf of Mexico through Capri Pass and the Big Marco River. The upland parcel currently consists of a single-family residence which has an existing riprap and mangrove shoreline with an existing dock and boathouse. The property is neighbored to the north and south by single family residences, to the east by the subject waterway, and to the west by Dolphin Circle. The SRS was conducted on May 17, 2024, between 9:30a.m. and 10:45 a.m. Site conditions on that day consisted of mostly cloudy skies with a southeast breeze approximately 5 mph. Water clarity was good which allowed for approximately 18-24 inches of visibility. The ambient air temperature was approximately 89 degrees Fahrenheit with an outgoing tide. High tide occurred before the site visit at approximately 9:18 a.m. and reached approximately 2.40 feet above the Mean Low Water Mark. Low tide was achieved after the site visit at approximately 3:39 p.m., reaching approximately 1.06 feet above the Mean Low Water Mark. Page 405 of 590 62 Dolphin Circle Submerged Resource Survey May 2024 2 2 OBJECTIVE The objective of the SRS was to identify and locate any existing submerged resources within 200 feet of the proposed dock project. Ordinarily, if seagrasses are present within the vicinity of a project area, an analysis will be required regarding species, percent coverage, and impacts projected by the proposed project. The presence of seagrasses may be ample cause for re- configuration of the design for projects over surface waters in order to minimize impacts. The general scope of work performed during a typical submerged resource survey is summarized below: • THA personnel will conduct a site visit and swim a series of transects within the project site in order to verify the location of any submerged resources. • THA personnel will identify submerged resources within the vicinity of the site and produce an estimate of the percent coverage of any resources found. • THA personnel will delineate the approximate limits of any submerged resources observed via a handheld GPS device. Page 406 of 590 62 Dolphin Circle Submerged Resource Survey May 2024 3 3 METHODOLOGY THA biologists intentionally designed the methodology of the SRS to cover not only the entire subject property shoreline for the proposed dock but also the area within 200 ft. of the proposed site as required by the Collier County LDC. The components utilized for this survey included: • Reviewing aerial photography of the surveyed area. • Establishing survey transect lines (spaced approximately 10 feet apart) overlaid onto aerials. (See attached Exhibits) • Physically swimming the transects, GPS locating the limits of any submerged resources found, and determining the percent coverage within the area. • Documenting and photographing all findings The surveyed area was evaluated systematically by following the established transect lines throughout the project site as shown on the attached exhibit. Neighboring properties, adjacent docking facilities, and other landmarks provided reference markers which assisted in maintaining correct positioning over each transect. During this SRS, one THA staff member swam the transect lines using snorkel equipment while a second remained on the shoreline and within a kayak taking notes and compiling findings on an aerial of the project site. Ordinarily, if any resources are found, they are photographed, GPS located, delineated, and analyzed for percent coverage within the area via a half meter square quadrat. Page 407 of 590 62 Dolphin Circle Submerged Resource Survey May 2024 4 4 RESULTS The substrate found within the surveyed area consists of silty sand material and shell debris. Depths increased gradually with distance from the shoreline to the middle of the waterway from approximately one to six feet. During the submerged portion of the survey, no seagrasses, oysters, or other resources were observed in any capacity. Accordingly, no impacts to submerged resources are expected to occur as the result of the proposed project. Numerous red mangroves are scattered along the shoreline which provide additional habitat and cover for fish as well as a natural buffer from high water. A list of species observed during the SRS can be seen below in Table 1. Table 1: Observed species of wildlife and vegetation within the vicinity of the project site Common Name Scientific Name Eastern mudminnow Umbra pygmaea Sheepshead Archosargus probatocephalus Bottle-nosed dolphin Tursiops truncatus Common Snook Centropomus undecimalis Gray Snapper Lutjanus griseus Greenback Oncorhynchus clarkii stomias Page 408 of 590 62 Dolphin Circle Submerged Resource Survey May 2024 5 5 CONCLUSION The submerged resource survey was conducted and completed throughout a 200-foot radius surrounding the project site and yielded few results. An existing docking facility and riprap shoreline provided surface area for barnacles and a few oysters to grow with numerous fish swimming about. At the time of the survey there were no seagrasses or other marine resources that were observed anywhere within the vicinity of the project site. Based off these observations it is THA opinion that the proposed project will not have any negative impacts to any submerged resources nor the subject waterway water quality. Page 409 of 590 62 Dolphin Circle Submerged Resource Survey May 2024 6 6 PHOTOS Photo 1: Existing dock and boathouse. Photo 2: View to the NE of subject waterway. Page 410 of 590 62 Dolphin Circle Submerged Resource Survey May 2024 7 Photo 3: Existing mangrove & riprap shoreline. Photo 4: Typical sediment observed in survey area. Page 411 of 590 Page 412 of 590 Page 413 of 590 Page 414 of 590 Page 415 of 590 Page 416 of 590 Page 417 of 590 Page 418 of 590 Page 419 of 590 Page 420 of 590 Page 421 of 590 Page 422 of 590 Page 423 of 590 Page 424 of 590 Page 425 of 590 Page 426 of 590 Page 427 of 590 Page 428 of 590 Page 429 of 590 Page 430 of 590 Page 431 of 590 Page 432 of 590 Page 433 of 590 1 John Kelly From:Sean Sammon Sent:Tuesday, November 26, 2024 10:21 AM To:John Kelly Subject:FW: 62 Dolphin - John K's Pics Attachments:20241126_084235.jpg; 20241126_084207.jpg; 20241126_084234.jpg John, see attached for your pics for 62 Dolphin. Sean Sammon Planner III Zoning Office:239-252-8422 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Sean.Sammon@colliercountyfl.gov From: Sean Sammon <ssback39@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2024 8:49 AM To: Sean Sammon <Sean.Sammon@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: 62 Dolphin - John K's Pics EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Attached Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Page 434 of 590 Page 435 of 590 Page 436 of 590 VA-PL20240007332 203 E Goodland Drive Attachment Fl Letter of Objection '4 7! ... if 311 •.- - . . ir • Ng • ore wav . • �7 r.�,., . iaf :,N,M1:_> ,l y • x i 52". . '4, 414' 2 • c - fZn 2; :9 1. • t>35' 414 • - • Unit:ti - ''' gg [ . ..,i. • t }' ' Zoning: • • • + _; - -Z0� i$ !� �V R-GZO • ' ,Iiif, " w 2P Pettit DR in •�' 39 '• r•:f HD.-1 - • '' - i . • _ r 4 R4F4 GZO� _'d'f�+ 7O8 t=. - O311 Pettit Drive, Keyla and Rick Smotryski John Kelly From: Keyla Smotryski <keylasmotryski@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, December 6, 2024 9:18 AM To: John Kelly Subject: RE:VA-PL20240007332 and BD-PL20240003998 - 203 Goodland Drive E - Objections EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Good morning, Mr. Kelly, We are one of the property owners near the requested variance. We are opposed to the variance and have many concerns about it if granted. This is an excessive ask and an intrusive design. In negotiations, the developer often asks for something unreasonable, hoping the county will counter by giving up something smaller.This may be the case here, as the variance is so significant as to be unreasonable. This is bad behavior and should not be reinforced. We do not feel the variance is necessary. It will restrict neighboring properties to such an extent that all neighbors will come clamoring to the county for a similar variance. It sets a bad precedent. Please forward my email to whoever you think is necessary and register our objection. Thank you for your time. Keyla and Rick Smotryski 311 Pettit Drive Trust 1 12/12/2024 Item # 3.F ID# 2024-2152 PETITION NO. VA-PL20240007332 – 203 Goodland Dr E – Request for a variance from Land Development Code Section 5.03.06.E.6 to reduce the minimum side yard riparian setbacks from 7.5 feet to zero feet on both side yards for a proposed dock facility on an unplatted boat dock lot with 20± feet of water frontage within a Residential Single-Family-4 Zoning District and the Goodland Zoning Overlay (RSF-4- GZO). The subject property is deeded with and located north and immediately across Pettit Drive from 203 Goodland Drive East in Section 18, Township 52 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. (Companion to BD-PL20240003998) (Coordinator: John Kelly, Planner III) (Commissioner District 1) ATTACHMENTS: 1. Staff Report VA-PL20240007332 11202024 2. Attachment A - Legal Description 3. Attachment B - Site and Dock Plans 4. Attachment C - Map of Boundary Survey 5. Attachment D - Applicant's Backup 6. Attachment E - Sign Posting 11262024 7. Attachment F - Letter of Objection Page 437 of 590 VA-PL20240007332; 203 Goodland Dr E Page 1 of 7 November 20, 2024 STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FROM: ZONING DIVISION – ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: DECEMBER 12, 2024 SUBJECT: VA-PL20240007332, 203 GOODLAND DRIVE EAST – GOODLAND, COMPANION TO BD- PL20240003998 _____________________________________________________________________________ PROPERTY OWNER/APPLICANT: AGENT: Noble & Noble Investments, LLC Nick Pearson 24556 Betts Pond Rd Bayshore Marine Consulting, LLC Millsboro, DE 19966 2025 Monroe Ave. Naples, FL 34112 REQUESTED ACTION: To have the Collier County Hearing Examiner (HEX) consider a variance from Section 5.03.06.E.6 of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) to reduce the minimum side yard riparian setbacks for dock facilities on lots with less than 60 feet of water frontage from 7.5 feet to 0 (zero) feet on both sides for a new dock facility on a lot with 20± feet of water frontage, subject to the approval of a companion Boat Dock Extension petition. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is an unplatted boat dock lot deeded with and located north and immediately across Petit Drive from 203 Goodland Drive East in Section 18, Township 52 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. (see location map on the following page) PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The subject property comprises 0.13 acres, located in a Residential Single-Family-4 (RSF-4) Zoning District within the Goodland Zoning Overlay (GZO), which has historically been used as a boat dock lot that is deeded with an upland single-family dwelling directly across the road; see Attachment A – Legal Description. The subject property is nonconforming with respect to lot area and width and is too small to support a principal structure; however, it has been deeded together with an upland property across Pettit Drive, thereby authorizing its historical use as a boat dock lot (an accessory use). As the proposed dock will protrude 33 feet into the waterway, a companion Boat Dock Extension (BD) is also required. Page 438 of 590 VA-PL20240007332; 203 Goodland Dr E Page 2 of 7 November 20, 2024 Page 439 of 590 VA-PL20240007332; 203 Goodland Dr E Page 3 of 7 November 20, 2024 SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: North: Waterway/canal then unimproved property within an RSF-4-GZO zoning district East: Goodland Drive East (Right-of-Way), then a single-family residence located within an RSF-4-GZO zoning district South: A single-family residence located within an RSF-4-GZO zoning district West: A single-family residence located within an RSF-4-GZO zoning district Aerial (Collier County GIS) Page 440 of 590 VA-PL20240007332; 203 Goodland Dr E Page 4 of 7 November 20, 2024 Aerial (Collier County GIS) GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: The subject property is located within the Urban -– Coastal Fringe Subdistrict of the Urban Mixed-Use District and is also located within the Coastal High Hazard Area on the County’s Future Land Use Map (FLUM) of the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the GMP. The GMP does not address individual Variance requests but deals with the larger issue of the actual use. The existing single-family use is consistent with the FLUM of the GMP. The requested variance does not have any impact on this property's consistency with the County's GMP. ZONING ANALYSIS: The decision to grant a variance is based on the criteria in LDC Section 9.04.03.A–H (in bold font below). Staff has analyzed this petition relative to these provisions and offers the following responses: a.Are there special conditions and circumstances existing that are peculiar to the location, size, and characteristics of the land, structure, or building involved? Yes. The subject property is legally nonconforming with respect to the required lot area and width and is not capable of supporting any listed permitted use within the RSF-4 zoning area in which it is located. As a result, the subject property has historically been used as a boat dock lot. Said use is authorized as the subject property is deeded together with an upland lot that supports a single-family dwelling (a principal use); the combined lots are separated by Pettit Drive. There are several other similar lots in the immediate vicinity; all Page 441 of 590 VA-PL20240007332; 203 Goodland Dr E Page 5 of 7 November 20, 2024 used similarly; however, staff did not research how their use was authorized. b. Are there special conditions and circumstances that do not result from the action of the applicant, such as pre-existing conditions relative to the property, which are the subject of the Variance request? Yes. As per records obtained from the Property Appraiser’s Office, the existing dock was first observed in 1991, prior to the transfer of ownership to the current owner. Said dock is to be removed to allow for the subject replacement. c. Will a literal interpretation of the provisions of this zoning code work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant or create practical difficulties for the applicant? The applicant’s agent states: “Yes, denial of a side setback variance for this property would severely limit the buildability and use of the lot, particularly in comparison to the neighboring boat slip lots.” Zoning staff agrees that denial of this petition would create practical difficulties for the applicant. d. Will the Variance, if granted, be the minimum Variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building or structure and which promote standards of health, safety and welfare? The applicant’s agent states: “The applicant is proposing to only utilize the space within their riparian area and is proposing the same side setbacks as many of the nearby boat slip lots. And it is our opinion that a side setback variance of 0’ is reasonable for the circumstances.” Zoning staff concurs; however, I must note that the Zoning Atlas yields no information pertaining to the use or setbacks currently enjoyed by the other property owners. e. Will granting the Variance confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by these zoning regulations to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district? By definition, a Variance bestows some dimensional relief from the zoning regulations specific to a site. LDC Section 9.04.02 allows relief through the Variance process for any dimensional development standard. As such, other properties facing a similar hardship would be entitled to make a similar request and would be conferred equal consideration on a case-by-case basis. f. Will granting the Variance be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Land Development Code and not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare? Yes, the applicant’s agent states: “The dock facility code as outlined in Chapter 5.03.06A. states that: “Docks and the like are primarily intended to adequately secure moored vessels and provide safe access for routine maintenance and use, while Page 442 of 590 VA-PL20240007332; 203 Goodland Dr E Page 6 of 7 November 20, 2024 minimally impacting navigation within any adjacent navigable channel, the use of the waterway, the use of neighboring docks, the native marine habitat, manatees, and the view of the waterway by the neighboring property owners.” The dock design as proposed (a 4-foot by 30-foot finger pier) is too narrow to provide any other function but to access and maintain the vessel that will be on the attached boat lift. The project will protrude only 7 feet into the platted waterway and will leave ample space within the platted waterway for navigation. Neither should the dock impact submerged resources and, by extension, manatees. Considering that the project as proposed is consistent with the general area’s uses and other docks in the vicinity, we do not believe views will be impacted either. Therefore, our opinion is that the proposed dock is in harmony with the intent and purpose of the zoning code.” Zoning staff concurs. g. Are there natural conditions or physically induced conditions that ameliorate the goals and objectives of the regulation, such as natural preserves, lakes, golf courses, etc.? Yes, the applicant’s agent states: “The area which the proposed structures would cover per this variance petition consists of the surface waters of a tidally connected man-made waterway. Construction within the riparian lines, as proposed, will have no effect on the water and has been designed to be compliant with the applicable state and federal restrictions for this location. Additionally, the proposed project has already been authorized at the state and federal levels of government.” Zoning staff concurs. h. Will granting the Variance be consistent with the Growth Management Plan? Yes, approval of this Variance will not affect or change the requirements of the GMP with respect to density, intensity, compatibility, access/connectivity, or any other applicable provisions. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) RECOMMENDATION: The EAC does not normally hear variance petitions. Since the subject variance doesn’t impact any preserve area, the EAC did not hear this petition. CONCURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS: • Companion Petition No. BD- PL20240003998, to allow the proposed boat dock facility to protrude a total of 33 feet into a waterway that is 100± feet wide. PUBLIC NOTICE: Notice Requirements for variance petitions are contained within LDC Section 10.03.06.F.2. The required Agent Letter was sent to all property owners located within 150 feet of the subject property on or about November 1, 2024, as evidenced by an executed Affidavit of Compliance contained within Attachment D. Page 443 of 590 VA-PL20240007332; 203 Goodland Dr E Page 7 of 7 November 20, 2024 Notice of the Hearing Examiner meeting was provided by posting on the Clerk of Court’s website and through a mailed notice to owners within 500 feet of the site on or about November 22, 2024, and a public notice sign was placed on the property by staff 15 days before the scheduled hearing. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Collier County Hearing Examiner APPROVE Petition VA- PL20240007332 to reduce the minimum side/riparian setback from 7.5 feet to 0 (zero) on both sides, as depicted within the “Proposed Project” plan contained within Attachment B, subject to the following conditions of approval: 1. This dock is private in nature and shall not be used for rental purposes; and 2. This dock shall not be used for any commercial purposes, including the mooring of commercial boats, unless specifically permitted within the Goodland Zoning Overlay (GZO). Attachments: A.Legal Description B.Site and Dock Plans C.Map of Boundary Survey D.Applicant’s Backup; Application, Narrative, Authorizations, etc. E.Posting of Public Hearing Sign F.Letter of Objection Page 444 of 590 Legal Description LOT 13, OF PETTIT SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 2, PAGE 88, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND A PARCEL LYING IN GOVERNMENT LOT 14, SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 52 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, TALLAHASSEE MERIDIAN, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS: COMMENCING AT A 4" X 4" CONCRETE MONUMENT WITH A 3/4" GALVANIZED IRON PIPE MARKING THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF PETTIT SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 2, PAGE 88, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROCEED SOUTH 88° 07' 30" EAST FOLLOWING THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID PETTIT SUBDIVISION FOR 246.00 FEET TO A 3/4" GALVANIZED IRON PIPE, THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE SOUTH 88° 07' 30" EAST FOLLOWING SAID BOUNDARY 20.00 FEET TO A 3/4" GALVANIZED IRON PIPE; THENCE RUN NORTH 1° 52' 30" EAST FOR 19.00 FEET TO A 3/4" GALVANIZED IRON PIPE ON THE BANK OF A CANAL FROM GOODLAND BAY; THENCE CONTINUE NORTH 1° 52' 30" EAST FOR 21.81 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID CANAL; THENCE PROCEED WESTERLY FOLLOWING THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID CANAL ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 130.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00° 48' 21" FOR A DISTANCE OF 1.83 FEET TO POINT OF TANGENCY, THE TANGENT AT LAST AFORESAID POINT OF BEARING NORTH 77° 22' 11" WEST; THENCE CONTINUE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY CANAL BOUNDARY NORTH 76° 33' 50" WEST FOR 18.17 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE RUN SOUTH 01° 52' 30" WEST FOR 24.89 FEET TO A 3/4" GALVANIZED IRON PIPE ON SAID CANAL BANK; SAID PIPE BEING NORTH 85° 16' 30" WEST 20.04 FEET FROM LAST AFORESAID 3/4" GALVANIZED IRON PIPE ON SAID CANAL BANK; THENCE CONTINUE SOUTH 01° 52' 30" WEST FOR 20.00 FEET TO POINT OF BEGINNING. Page 445 of 590 NOTES:THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTINGPURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDEDFOR CONSTRUCTION USE.LATITUDE:N 25.9263092LONGITUDE:W -81.6448954SITE ADDRESS:203 GOODLAND DR. EGOODLAND, FL 34140CREATED:JOB NO.:DESIGNED:C:\Bayshore Marine Consulting\2411 - Aquamarine-Noble, 203 Goodland Dr. E\CAD\CC\Collier variance set-R1.dwg LOCATION MAP 12/4/2024SHEET NO.:01 OF 05LOCATION MAPNOBLE DOCK241112-04-24N.S.P.COLLIER COUNTYSUBJECT PROPERTYSTATE OF FLORIDANESWPID #:66680320005SECTION:18TOWNSHIP:52 SCOUNTY:COLLIERRANGE:27 EGOODLANDMARCO ISLANDPage 446 of 590 PROPERTYBOUNDARYEXISTING FIXED DOCKSCALE IN FEET8040200CREATED:JOB NO.:DESIGNED:C:\Bayshore Marine Consulting\2411 - Aquamarine-Noble, 203 Goodland Dr. E\CAD\CC\Collier variance set-R1.dwg EXISTING CONDITIONS 12/4/2024SHEET NO.:NESWN.S.P.12-04-24241102 OF 05NOBLE DOCKEXISTING CONDITIONS·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPRX. LF):·EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPRX. SF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPRX. LF):NOTES:·EXISTING PROTRUSION FROM MHWL:2076100'20'SITE ADDRESS:203 E. GOODLAND DR.34140,GOODLANDFLGOODLAND DR. EPETIT DR.RIPARIAN LINERIPARIANLINE41' 45'20'20'MHWLEXISTING RIP RAPEXISTINGNEIGHBORINGDOCKS20'100'55'100'55'4'5' SIDESETBACK10' SIDESETBACK7.5' RIPARIANSETBACKSPage 447 of 590 C:\Bayshore Marine Consulting\2411 - Aquamarine-Noble, 203 Goodland Dr. E\CAD\CC\Collier variance set-R1.dwg 12/4/2024AA04PROPERTYBOUNDARYSCALE IN FEET201050CREATED:JOB NO.:DESIGNED:C:\Bayshore Marine Consulting\2411 - Aquamarine-Noble, 203 Goodland Dr. E\CAD\CC\Collier variance set-R1.dwg PROPOSED DOCK 12/4/2024SHEET NO.:NESWPROPOSED PROJECTNOBLE DOCK03 OF 05241112-04-24N.S.P.PROPOSED DOCKAND BOATLIFTSRIPARIAN LINEESTIMATEDRIPARIAN LINE·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPRX. LF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPRX):NOTES:·PROPOSED OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPRX SF):·TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM MHWL:33150100205'12.5'7'EXISTINGNEIGHBORINGDOCKEXISTINGNEIGHBORINGDOCKSMHWLSURVEYED LOTBOUNDARY LINES0.5' SIDESETBACK0.5' SIDESETBACK33' MAX. PROTRUSION FROM MHWL 30' 31'20'EXISTINGRIP RAP6'Page 448 of 590 C:\Bayshore Marine Consulting\2411 - Aquamarine-Noble, 203 Goodland Dr. E\CAD\CC\Collier variance set-R1.dwg 12/4/2024DIMENSIONS SHOWN AREAPPROXIMATED BASED OFFTHE AERIAL IMAGE AND ARESUBJECT TO MINOR ERRORSCALE IN FEET200100500CREATED:JOB NO.:DESIGNED:C:\Bayshore Marine Consulting\2411 - Aquamarine-Noble, 203 Goodland Dr. E\CAD\CC\Collier variance set-R1.dwg ADJACENT DOCKS 12/4/2024SHEET NO.:NESWADJACENT DOCKSNOBLE DOCK04 OF 05241112-04-24N.S.P.95' 22' 28'74'3 0 ' 24'23'19'26'33'Page 449 of 590 C:\Bayshore Marine Consulting\2411 - Aquamarine-Noble, 203 Goodland Dr. E\CAD\CC\Collier variance set-R1.dwg 12/4/2024PROPOSED DOCKAND BOATLIFTSRIPARIAN LINEESTIMATEDRIPARIAN LINEEXISTINGNEIGHBORINGDOCKEXISTINGNEIGHBORINGDOCKSMHWLPROPERTYBOUNDARYSCALE IN FEET201050CREATED:JOB NO.:DESIGNED:C:\Bayshore Marine Consulting\2411 - Aquamarine-Noble, 203 Goodland Dr. E\CAD\CC\Collier variance set-R1.dwg ALTERNATE DESIGN 12/4/2024SHEET NO.:NESWALTERNATE DESIGNNOBLE DOCK05 OF 05241112-04-24N.S.P.·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPRX. LF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPRX):NOTES:·PROPOSED OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPRX SF):·TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM MHWL:331301002020'EXISTINGRIP RAP30' 31' 33' MAX. PROTRUSION FROM MHW L 7'12.5'0' SIDESETBACK8.3'2.7'5.6'4'10'5'22'SURVEYED LOTBOUNDARY LINESPage 450 of 590 PETTIT DRIVE FND 1 2" IR, NO IDS88°07'30"E 246.00'RADIAL LINESET 5 8" IRC ,LB7324 WITNESS CORNER SET 5 8" IRC, LB7324 MHWL LOCATED 4/3/24 EL: 0.67' NAVD 88 POINT OF COMMENCEMENT NW'LY CORNER OF PETTIT SUB. FND 5/8" IR, NO ID 10.00'10.00'9.00'10.00'S88°07'30"E 20.00'N01°52'30"E 21.81'N76°33' 5 0 " W 18.17' ( D ) 1 8 . 5 8 ' ( C )S01°52'30"W 24.89'N01°52'30"E 19.00'S01°52'30"W 20.00'L: 1.83' R: 130.00' Δ: 0°48'21"N12°37'49"EDOCK PARCEL BOUNDARY LINE (TYP) LEGEND: (C) CALCULATED CCR COLLIER COUNTY RECORDS C/L CENTER LINE (D) DEED FND FOUND IR(C) IRON ROD (& CAP) LB LICENSED BUSINESS MHW(L) MEAN HIGH WATER (LINE) MLW(L) MEAN LOW WATER (LINE) NAVD 88 NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 ORB OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK PG PAGE PSM PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER TYP TYPICAL SPECIFIC PURPOSE SURVEY SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 52 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AQUA MARINECONSTRUCTIONTERRAQUATIC, INCPREPARED FOR / SITE ADDRESSPREPARED BY:DATE: 7/29/24DRAWING: 203 GOODLAND DR PERMIT.dwgDRAWN BY: BLSCALE: 1" = 10'JOB No.: 24-1836CHECKED BY: JRLSHEET 1 OF 2REV: 7/29/24 UPDATED NOTES PER CNTY CMNTS.CERTIFICATION: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ATTACHED SPECIFIC PURPOSE SURVEY IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF AS SURVEYED UNDER MY DIRECTION ON 4/3/24. I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT THIS SPECIFIC PURPOSE SURVEY MEETS THE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE AS SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 5J-17 ADOPTED BY THE FLORIDA BOARD OF SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS PURSUANT TO FLORIDA STATUTE 472.027.JOSHUA LEE, PSM - FLORIDA REGISTRATION NUMBER 7322 VICINITY MAPS NOT TO SCALE PROJECTLOCATION SURVEY SITE SURVEY NOTES: 1. THIS IS A SPECIFIC PURPOSE SURVEY AS DEFINED IN THE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE FOR SURVEYING AND MAPPING IN CHAPTER 5J-17 FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. 2. THIS SURVEY IS CERTIFIED TO AQUA MARINE CONSTRUCTION, BAYSHORE MARINE CONSULTING AND NOBLE & NOBLE INVESTMENTS, LLC. 3. THIS SURVEY IS INTENDED EXCLUSIVELY FOR THE USE BY THOSE TO WHOM IT IS CERTIFIED. IT IS NOT TO BE USED BY OTHERS FOR CONSTRUCTION, PERMITTING, DESIGN OR ANY OTHER USE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF TERRAQUATIC, INC. 4. THIS SURVEY, AND ANY REPRODUCTION THEREOF, IS NOT VALID WITHOUT AN ORIGINAL OR VERIFIED DIGITAL SIGNATURE AND SEAL OF A FLORIDA REGISTERED SURVEYOR. ADDITIONALLY, THIS SURVEY IS NOT VALID IF PRINTED BEARING A DIGITAL SIGNATURE AND SEAL. 5. OTHER THAN THOSE SHOWN ON THE REFERENCED PLAT, NO SEARCH OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS WAS PERFORMED FOR EASEMENTS, ENCUMBRANCES OR OTHER INSTRUMENTS OF RECORD WHICH MAY AFFECT THIS PARCEL OF LAND. 6. THIS MAP IS INTENDED TO BE DISPLAYED AT A SCALE OF 1 INCH = 20 FEET OR SMALLER. 7. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WERE NOT LOCATED AS PART OF THIS SURVEY. 8. BEARING AND DISTANCES SHOWN HERON ARE RELATIVE TO THE NORTH AMERICA DATUM OF 1983, 1990 ADJUSTMENT (NAD 83/90), FLORIDA STATE PLANE, EAST ZONE (0901), TRANSVERSE MERCATOR PROJECTION IN THE U.S. SURVEY FOOT UNIT OF MEASUREMENT. 9. BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE RELATIVE TO A GRID BEARING OF S88°07'30"E ALONG THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF PETTIT SUBDIVISION PER OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 321, PAGE 2572 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY PUBLIC RECORDS. 10. LOCATIONS WERE OBTAINED USING REAL TIME KINEMATIC GPS METHODOLOGIES WITH BROADCAST CORRECTIONS FROM THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION REFERENCE NETWORK AND ARE ACCURATE TO THIRD ORDER, CLASS II. 11. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, FIELD BEARINGS AND DISTANCES ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE RECORD DEED. 12. THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE OF THIS SURVEY IS TO PROVIDE THE NECESSARY INFORMATION FOR A DOCK PERMIT. 13. THE BOUNDARY INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON IS LIMITED TO THE "AND" PARCEL LYING IN GOVERNMENT LOT 14 AS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 6321 AT PAGE 2572, OF THE COLLIER COUNTY PUBLIC RECORDS, AND HEREIN REFERRED TO AS THE "DOCK PARCEL". AS SUCH, LOT 13, AS DESCRIBED IN SAID DEED, IS NOT PART OF THIS SURVEY. LEGAL DESCRIPTION (RECORD DEED, O.R.B. 6321, PG. 2572, C.C.R.) LOT 13, OF PETTIT SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 2, PAGE 88, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND A PARCEL LYING IN GOVERNMENT LOT 14, SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 52 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, TALLAHASSEE MERIDIAN, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS: COMMENCING AT A 4" X 4" CONCRETE MONUMENT WITH A 3/4" GALVANIZED IRON PIPE MARKING THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF PETTIT SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 2, PAGE 88, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROCEED SOUTH 88° 07' 30" EAST FOLLOWING THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID PETTIT SUBDIVISION FOR 246.00 FEET TO A 3/4" GALVANIZED IRON PIPE,THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE SOUTH 88° 07' 30" EAST FOLLOWING SAID BOUNDARY 20.00 FEET TO A 3/4" GALVANIZED IRON PIPE; THENCE RUN NORTH 1° 52' 30" EAST FOR 19.00 FEET TO A 3/4" GALVANIZED IRON PIPE ON THE BANK OF A CANAL FROM GOODLAND BAY; THENCE CONTINUE NORTH 1° 52' 30" EAST FOR 21.81 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID CANAL; THENCE PROCEED WESTERLY FOLLOWING THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID CANAL ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 130.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00° 48' 21" FOR A DISTANCE OF 1.83 FEET TO POINT OF TANGENCY, THE TANGENT AT LAST AFORESAID POINT OF BEARING NORTH 77° 22' 11" WEST; THENCE CONTINUE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY CANAL BOUNDARY NORTH 76° 33' 50" WEST FOR 18.17 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE RUN SOUTH 01° 52' 30" WEST FOR 24.89 FEET TO A 3/4" GALVANIZED IRON PIPE ON SAID CANAL BANK; SAID PIPE BEING NORTH 85° 16' 30" WEST 20.04 FEET FROM LAST AFORESAID 3/4" GALVANIZED IRON PIPE ON SAID CANAL BANK; THENCE CONTINUE SOUTH 01° 52' 30" WEST FOR 20.00 FEET TO POINT OF BEGINNING.    HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1" = 10' 10'5'0' Page 451 of 590 3.1'·3.2'·3.1'·3.1'·3.2'·3. 3 '·3. 5 '·3.8'·3.2'·2.5'·1.6'·0.5'·0.3'·0.7'·0.4'·0.0'·0.9'·1.6'·2.1'·2.8'·3.4'·3.4'·3. 3 '·3.3'·3.2'·3.1'·3.1'·2.9'·2.8'·2.6'·2.7'·2.0'·2.4'·2.8'·2.7'·2.9'·3.0'·3.2'·3. 1 '·3.3'·3.2'·3.3'·3.3'·3.3'·3.4'·3. 3 '·3.5'·3.1'·3.1'·2.5'·2.5'·1.8'·1.9'·1.3'·1.4'·0.6'·0.7'·0.1'·0.5'·   HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1" = 20' 20'10'0'TERRAQUATIC, INCPREPARED BY:DRAWN BY: BLSCALE: 1" = 20' CHECKED BY: JRLSHEET 2 OF 2REV:AQUA MARINECONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FOR / SITE ADDRESSDATE: 7/29/24DRAWING: 203 GOODLAND DR PERMIT.dwgJOB No.: 24-1836DETAIL (N.T.S.) HYDROGRAPHIC DATA ARE RELATIVE TO MEAN LOW WATER. DATUMS PROVIDED BY THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION LOCAL VERTICAL DATUM DIAGRAM NAVD-88 MLW -1.88' MHW +0.67' Page 452 of 590 Revised 5/18/2018 Provide to Agents G:\CDES Planning Services\Current\Zoning Staff Information\Job Aides or Help Guides HEARING PACKAGE CHECKLIST A. Backup provided by the County Planner The agent is responsible for all required data included in the digital file of information for the Hearing Examiner (Hex) or the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC). DO NOT ACCEPT DUPLICATES OF ANY DOCUMENTS. MAKE SURE ONLY THE LATEST, ACCEPTED/APPROVED COPY OF THE BELOW DOCUMENTATION. PLEASE CONFIRM THE DOCUMENTS ARE IN THE ORDER DESCRIBED IN “BACKUP PROVIDED BY APPLICANT.” Planner responsible for providing the County Attorney-drafted Ordinance for PUDs and placing in backup materials. AGENTS DO NOT INCLUDE THE PUD DOCUMENT – STAFF PROVIDES THIS TO THE COUNTY ATTORNEY WHEN THE ORDINANCE IS DRAFTED FOR A PUD. THE FINAL PUD ORDINANCE/RESOLUTION IS THE FIRST ITEM AFTER THE STAFF REPORT. [FOR HEX, THE REQUESTED LANGUAGE/ PROPOSED PLAN IS THE FIRST ITEM AFTER THE STAFF REPORT] B. Backup provided by Applicant: PLEASE PROVIDE THE DOCUMENTS IN THE ORDER DESCRIBED BELOW. DO NOT PROVIDE DUPLICATES OF ANY DOCUMENTS. PROVIDE ONLY THE LATEST, ACCEPTED/APPROVED COPY OF THE BELOW DOCUMENTATION. IF THE BACKUP PROVIDED BY APPLICANT IS IN DISARRAY-MEANING IT IS NOT IN THE PROPER ORDER AND/OR THE APPLICANT PROVIDES MULTIPLE DUPLICATES-THE APPLICANT COULD LOSE ITS HEARING DATE. _X_ Application, to include but not limited to the following: _X_ Narrative of request _X_ Property Information _X_ Property Ownership Disclosure Form _X_ Any other documents required by the specific petition type; such as a variance, a boat dock extension; PUD amendment, rezone request, etc. ____ Disclosure of Property Ownership Interest (if there is additional documentation aside from disclosure form) ____ Affidavit of Unified Control _X__ Affidavit of Representation Authorization _X__ Drawings (may include Cross-Section (for BDEs generally), proposed Boat Dock(s) with Water depth, location maps etc.) _X__ NIM Information (Sign in sheet, notes, minutes and transcript/or summary)  Include 3 thumbnail drives of video and/or audio Agent Letter & Mailing List ____ Traffic Impact Study (TIS) ____ Environmental Data ____ Historical/Archeological Survey or Waiver ____ Utility Letter _X__ Deviation Justifications Page 453 of 590 Revised 5/18/2018 Provide to Agents G:\CDES Planning Services\Current\Zoning Staff Information\Job Aides or Help Guides _X__ Boundary Survey ____ Other documents, as needed, on a case-by-case basis such as relevant prior Ordinances, Conditional Uses, historical documents, any “private or legal” agreements affecting the PUD etc. ___ Submerged Resource Surveys may be included here if required. _X__ flash drive with only one pdf file for all documents I understand that by submitting the above materials, it is the agent’s/applicant’s responsibility to ensure all materials are in the same order for flash drive must contain the documents in one pdf file. It is the agent’s responsibility to ensure no documentation is left out. ________________________________________ ____________________ Signature of Agent Representative Date ________________________________________ Printed Name of Signing Agent Representative 11-21-2024 Nick Pearson Page 454 of 590 Application Form Page 455 of 590 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252‐2400 FAX: (239) 252‐6358 4/27/2018 Page 1 of 6 VARIANCE PETITION APPLICATION Variance from Setbacks Required for a Particular Zoning District LDC section 9.04.00 & Code of Laws section 2‐83 – 2‐90 Chapter 3 J. of the Administrative Code PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT NAME DATE PROCESSED APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Property Owner(s): ______________________________________________________ Name of Applicant if different than owner: __________________________________________ Address: _________________________City: ________________ State: _______ ZIP: ________ Telephone: ___________________ Cell: ____________________ Fax: ____________________ E‐Mail Address: ________________________________________________________________ Name of Agent: ________________________________________________________________ Firm: _________________________________________________________________________ Address: ___________________________City: ________________ State: _______ ZIP: ______ Telephone: ____________________ Cell: ___________________ Fax: ____________________ E‐Mail Address: ________________________________________________________________ BE AWARE THAT COLLIER COUNTY HAS LOBBYIST REGULATIONS. GUIDE YOURSELF ACCORDINGLY AND ENSURE THAT YOU ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THESE REGULATIONS. To be completed by staff Noble & Noble Investments, LLC Joesph Noble Nick Pearson Bayshore Marine Consulting, LLC 2025 Monroe Ave. Naples FL 34112 239-404-7982 Nick@Bayshoremarineconsulting.com 24556 Betts Pond Dr. Millsboro DE 19966 Page 456 of 590 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 4/27/2018 Page 2 of 6 PROPERTY INFORMATION Provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the application: (If space is inadequate, attach on separate page) Property I.D. Number: ____________________ Section/Township/Range: / / Subdivision: _____________________________________ Unit: _____Lot: Block: Metes & Bounds Description: __________________________________ Total Acreage: ______ Address/ General Location of Subject Property: ______________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE Zoning Land Use N S E W Minimum Yard Requirements for Subject Property: Front: Corner Lot: Yes No Side: Waterfront Lot: Yes No Rear: Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code requires that the applicant must remove their public hearing advertising sign(s) after final action is taken by the Board of County Commissioners. Based on the Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing advertising sign(s) immediately. Page 457 of 590 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 4/27/2018 Page 3 of 6 ASSOCIATIONS Complete the following for all registered Association(s) that could be affected by this petition. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Board of County Commissioner’s website at http://www.colliergov.net/Index.aspx?page=774. Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: _____ NATURE OF PETITION On a separate sheet, attached to the application, please provide the following: 1.A detailed explanation of the request including what structures are existing and what is proposed; the amount of encroachment proposed using numbers, i.e. reduce front setback from 25 ft. to 18 ft.; when property owner purchased property; when existing prin cipal structure was built (include building permit number(s) if possible); why encroachment is necessary; how existing encroachment came to be; etc. 2.For projects authorized under LDC Section 9.04.02, provide a detailed description of site alterations, including any dredging and filling. 3.Pursuant to LDC section 9.04.00, staff shall be guided in their recommendation to the Hearing Examiner, and the Hearing Examiner shall be guided in the determination to approve or deny a variance petition by the criteria (a-h) listed below. Please address the following criteria: a)Are there special conditions and circumstances existing which are peculiar to the location, size and characteristics of the land, structure, or building involved. Page 458 of 590 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 4/27/2018 Page 4 of 6 b)Are there special conditions and circumstances which do not result from the action of the applicant such as pre-existing conditions relative to the property which is the subject of the variance request. c)Will a literal interpretation of the provisions of this zoning code work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant or create practical difficulties on the applicant. d)Will the variance, if granted, be the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building or structure and which promote standards of health, safety or welfare. e)Will granting the variance requested confer on the petitioner any special privilege that is denied by these zoning regulations to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district. f)Will granting the variance be in harmony with the intent and purpose of this zoning code, and not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. g)Are there natural conditions or physically induced conditions that ameliorate the goals and objectives of the regulation such as natural preserves, lakes, golf course, etc. h)Will granting the variance be consistent with the Growth Management Plan? 4.Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? Yes No If yes, please provide copies. Page 459 of 590 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 4/27/2018 Page 5 of 6 Pre-Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: Variance Chapter 3 J. of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement Checklist is to be utilized during the Pre-Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At time of submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW # OF COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Completed Application (download current form from County website) Pre-Application Meeting Notes 1 Project Narrative Completed Addressing Checklist 1 Property Ownership Disclosure Form 1 Conceptual Site Plan 24” x 36” and one 8 ½ ” x 11” copy Survey of property showing the encroachment (measured in feet) 2 Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 2 Deeds/Legal’s 3 Location map 1 Current aerial photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial 5 Historical Survey or waiver request 1 Environmental Data Requirements or exemption justification 3 Once the first set of review comments are posted, provide the assigned planner the Property Owner Advisory Letter and Certification 1 Electronic copy of all documents and plans *Please advise: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all materials to be submitted electronically in PDF format. 1 ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: •Following the completion of the review process by County review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. •Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. Page 460 of 590 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 4/27/2018 Page 6 of 6 Planners: Indicate if the petition needs to be routed to the following reviewers: Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment: Executive Director Historical Review City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director Immokalee Water/Sewer District Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Ryan Parks and Recreation: David Berra Emergency Management: Dan Summers; and/or EMS: Artie Bay School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart Other: FEE REQUIREMENTS  Pre-Application Meeting: $500.00  Variance Petition: o Residential- $2,000.00 o Non-Residential- $5,000.00 o 5th and Subsequent Review- 20% of original fee  Estimated Legal Advertising Fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner: $1,125.00  After The Fact Zoning/Land Use Petitions: 2x the normal petition fee  Listed Species Survey (if EIS is not required): $1,000.00 Fire Code Plans Review Fees are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and the permit fee shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department Zoning Division ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 __________________________________ ____________________ Applicant Signature Date __________________________________ Printed Name Page 461 of 590 Narrative Statement Page 462 of 590 Variance Petition #PL20240007332 Nature of the Petition 1. A detailed explanation of the request including what structures are existing and what is proposed; the amount of encroachment proposed using numbers, i.e. reduce front setback from 25 ft. to 18 ft.; when property owner purchased property; when existing principal structure was built (include building permit number(s) if possible); why encroachment is necessary; how existing encroachment came to be; etc. The property at 203 Goodland Dr. E, owned by Joseph Noble through his own corporation, Noble & Noble Investments, LLC since December of 2023, is an unconventional type of lot consisting of 2 distinct parcels, one of which is land locked on the south side of Goodland Dr and that contains a single-family residence, and a second smaller parcel with water frontage on the North side of Goodland Dr. that includes only a dock facility. Both parcels are located within the Petit subdivision of Goodland. The larger parcel is a 55’ by 100’ parallelogram shaped lot which, as previously mentioned, contains a single-family residence. The smaller lot is 20’ wide by 41’ to 45’ deep and contains a 4’ wide by 20’ long dock facility and a rip rap shoreline. The platted boundary of the smaller parcel extends into the waterway approximately 23’ to 26’, making the land area of the plot only 20’ wide by 17.5 to 19’ deep. This causes the platted waterway to be approximately 68’ wide, but the actual waterway width from MHWL to MHWL is approximately 100’ wide. The property is zoned RSF-4, which is intended for development with single-family residences. However, because of the smaller parcel’s size, it cannot by itself support a principle structure. Rather, its apparent sole purpose is for boat dockage. As such, the parcel is currently vacant with exception to the rip rap and dock. The subject property and its riparian area was originally dredged from land per the enclosed historic aerial overlay. We propose to remove the existing dock and replace it with a new dock facility measuring 4’ wide by 30’ long which would protrude (with vessel included) 33’ from the MHWL (which is the most restrictive point) and provide access to a single boatlift oriented in a shore normal configuration. The boatlift would provide access to (1) 31’ LOA vessel. The max protrusion of the facility would be equal to 33’, or 13’ beyond the typically allowed 20’ of protrusion for this site. The proposed overwater structure will amount to a total of 150 square feet. The boatlift piles for the lift on either side of the proposed dock would require 0’ side setbacks from both riparian lines in order to legally be constructed, or a 7.5’ setback variance from the typically required 7.5’ riparian setbacks required for this location. Considering the small riparian area of this lot, and the frequency on this street for which this size of setback has been approved in other cases, we believe that this is not an unreasonable ask and that the project should not otherwise cause or create any adverse effects to the neighbors or the surrounding waterway. 2. For projects authorized under LDC Section 9.04.02, provide a detailed description of site alterations, including any dredging and filling. The only alterations proposed under Section 9.04.02 include the construction of a private, recreational pile supported boat dock facility with 1 boatlift that will encroach upon the normally required 7.5’ side setbacks from the riparian lines. No dredging or filling is proposed as part of this project. 3. Pursuant to LDC section 9.04.00, staff shall be guided in their recommendation to the Hearing Examiner, and the Hearing Examiner shall be guided in the determination to approve or deny a variance petition by the criteria (a-h) listed below. Please address the following criteria: a. Are there special conditions and circumstances existing which are peculiar to the location, size and characteristics of the land, structure, or building involved. The parcel on which this project is located is essentially a dedicated boat slip lot. It is too small to fit a principal structure on it and so has essentially been dedicated solely as a boat-slip lot. There are several other “small” lots on this street of comparable size and they would all require side-setback variances under the current L.D.C. in order for docks with moorings to legally exist. Furthermore, the standard side setbacks combined with the typical protrusion limit for this lot would severely limit the buildable area for its intended use should this petition not be approved. Page 463 of 590 b. Are there special conditions and circumstances which do not result from the action of the applicant such as pre-existing conditions relative to the property which is the subject of the variance request. Please see the response to the previous criteria. The size of this lot combined with the county’s typical side setback requirements (7.5’ from each riparian line) and 20’ protrusion limit makes construction of an ample sized dock facility with mooring at this location that doesn’t require a BDE or setback variance nearly impossible. Furthermore, denial of this setback variance petition would create a disparity between this lot and the adjacent boat slip lots which mostly all appear to already have side setback approvals or grandfathered status. c. Will a literal interpretation of the provisions of this zoning code work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant or create practical difficulties on the applicant. Yes, denial of a side setback variance for this property would severely limit the buildability and use of the lot, particularly in comparison to the neighboring boat slip lots. d. Will the variance, if granted, be the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building or structure and which promote standards of health, safety or welfare. The applicant is proposing to only utilize the space within their riparian area and is proposing the same side setbacks as many of the nearby boat slip lots. And it is our opinion that a side setback variance of 0’ is reasonable for the circumstances. e. Will granting the variance requested confer on the petitioner any special privilege that is denied by these zoning regulations to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district. No, on the contrary, not approving this side setback variance would grant this property with less usability than many of the adjacent lots. The project should not affect any of the neighbors and should only serve to provide better riparian access to the dock’s slip owners. f. Will granting the variance be in harmony with the intent and purpose of this zoning code, and not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. The dock facility code as outlined in Chapter 5.03.06A. states that: “Docks and the like are primarily intended to adequately secure moored vessels and provide safe access for routine maintenance and use, while minimally impacting navigation within any adjacent navigable channel, the use of the waterway, the use of neighboring docks, the native marine habitat, manatees, and the view of the waterway by the neighboring property owners.” The dock design as proposed (a 5’ x 30’ finger pier) is too narrow to provide any other function but to access and maintenance the vessel that will be on the attached boat lift. The project will protrude only 7’ into the platted waterway and will leave ample space within the platted waterway for navigation. Neither should the dock impact submerged resources and by extension manatees. Considering that the project as proposed is consistent with the general area’s uses and other docks in the vicinity, we do not believe views will be impacted either. Therefore, our opinion is that the proposed dock is in harmony with the intent and purpose of the zoning code. g. Are there natural conditions or physically induced conditions that ameliorate the goals and objectives of the regulation such as natural preserves, lakes, golf course, etc. The area which the proposed structures would cover per this variance petition consists of the surface waters of a tidally connected man-made waterway. Construction within the riparian lines as proposed will have no effect on the water and has been designed to be compliant with the applicable state and federal restrictions for this location. Additionally, the proposed project has already been authorized at the state and federal levels of government. Page 464 of 590 h. Will granting the variance be consistent with the Growth Management Plan? Yes, besides the dock’s side setbacks and protrusions, all other design criteria will be met. Granting of a side setback variance in this instance will therefore be consistent with the Growth Management Plan. 4. Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? To our knowledge, an official interpretation or zoning verification has not been rendered on this property within the last year. Page 465 of 590 Property Information Page 466 of 590 Page 467 of 590 Page 468 of 590 Page 469 of 590 Page 470 of 590 Warranty Deed Page 471 of 590 Page 472 of 590 Page 473 of 590 Corporation Information Page 474 of 590 Page 475 of 590 Ownership Disclosure Form Page 476 of 590 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a.If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: Name and Address % of Ownership b.If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address % of Ownership c.If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest: Name and Address % of Ownership Page 477 of 590 d.If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners: Name and Address % of Ownership e.If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners: Name and Address % of Ownership Date of Contract: ___________ f.If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust: Name and Address g.Date subject property acquired _______________ Leased: Term of lease ____________ years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Page 478 of 590 Date of option: _________________________ Date option terminates: __________________, or Anticipated closing date: ________________ AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form. Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest-holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition’s final public hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. ____________________________________________ ____________ Agent/Owner Signature Date ____________________________________________ Agent/Owner Name (please print) *The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Community Development Department | GMD Portal: https://cvportal.colliercountyfl.gov/cityviewweb Questions? Email: GMDclientservices@colliercountyfl.gov Page 479 of 590 Affidavit of Authorization Page 480 of 590 PL20240003998 and PL20240007332 Page 481 of 590 Petition Exhibits Page 482 of 590 NOTES:THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTINGPURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDEDFOR CONSTRUCTION USE.LATITUDE:N 25.9263092LONGITUDE:W -81.6448954SITE ADDRESS:203 GOODLAND DR. EGOODLAND, FL 34140CREATED:JOB NO.:DESIGNED:C:\Bayshore Marine Consulting\2411 - Aquamarine-Noble, 203 Goodland Dr. E\CAD\CC\Collier variance set.dwg LOCATION MAP 6/21/2024SHEET NO.:01 OF 04LOCATION MAPNOBLE DOCK241106-11-24N.S.P.COLLIER COUNTYSUBJECT PROPERTYSTATE OF FLORIDANESWPID #:66680320005SECTION:18TOWNSHIP:52 SCOUNTY:COLLIERRANGE:27 EGOODLANDMARCO ISLANDPage 483 of 590 PROPERTYBOUNDARYEXISTING FIXED DOCKSCALE IN FEET8040200CREATED:JOB NO.:DESIGNED:C:\Bayshore Marine Consulting\2411 - Aquamarine-Noble, 203 Goodland Dr. E\CAD\CC\Collier variance set.dwg EXISTING CONDITIONS 6/21/2024SHEET NO.:NESWN.S.P.06-11-24241102 OF 04NOBLE DOCKEXISTING CONDITIONS·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPRX. LF):·EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPRX. SF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPRX. LF):NOTES:·EXISTING PROTRUSION FROM MHWL:2076100'20'SITE ADDRESS:203 E. GOODLAND DR.34140,GOODLANDFLGOODLAND DR. EPETIT DR.RIPARIAN LINERIPARIANLINEPLATTED WATERWAYBOUNDARY41' 45'20'20'MHWLEXISTING RIP RAPEXISTINGNEIGHBORINGDOCKS20'100'55'100'55'4'5' SIDESETBACK10' SIDESETBACK7.5' RIPARIANSETBACKSPage 484 of 590 C:\Bayshore Marine Consulting\2411 - Aquamarine-Noble, 203 Goodland Dr. E\CAD\CC\Collier variance set.dwg 6/21/2024AA04PROPERTYBOUNDARYSCALE IN FEET201050CREATED:JOB NO.:DESIGNED:C:\Bayshore Marine Consulting\2411 - Aquamarine-Noble, 203 Goodland Dr. E\CAD\CC\Collier variance set.dwg PROPOSED DOCK 6/21/2024SHEET NO.:NESWPROPOSED PROJECTNOBLE DOCK03 OF 04241106-11-24N.S.P.PROPOSED DOCKAND BOATLIFTSRIPARIAN LINEESTIMATEDRIPARIAN LINE·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPRX. LF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPRX):NOTES:·PROPOSED OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPRX SF):·TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM MHWL:33150100205'12.5'7'EXISTINGNEIGHBORINGDOCKEXISTINGNEIGHBORINGDOCKSMHWLPLATTED WATERWAYBOUNDARY0.5' SIDESETBACK0.5' SIDESETBACK33' MAX. PROTRUSION FROM MHWL 30' 31'20'EXISTINGRIP RAPPage 485 of 590 C:\Bayshore Marine Consulting\2411 - Aquamarine-Noble, 203 Goodland Dr. E\CAD\CC\Collier variance set.dwg 6/21/2024DIMENSIONS SHOWN AREAPPROXIMATED BASED OFFTHE AERIAL IMAGE AND ARESUBJECT TO MINOR ERRORSCALE IN FEET200100500CREATED:JOB NO.:DESIGNED:C:\Bayshore Marine Consulting\2411 - Aquamarine-Noble, 203 Goodland Dr. E\CAD\CC\Collier variance set.dwg ADJACENT DOCKS 6/21/2024SHEET NO.:NESWADJACENT DOCKSNOBLE DOCK04 OF 04241106-11-24N.S.P.95' 22' 28'74'3 0 ' 24'23'19'26'33'Page 486 of 590 Agent Letter and Mailing List Page 487 of 590 BAYSHORE MARINE CONSULTING, LLC www.Bayshore-Marine.com ● NICK@BAYSHOREMARINECONSULTING.COM ● 239-404-7982 Page 1 of 1 Letter of Notification for Variance Petition to Property Owners and Associations within 150 feet October 25, 2024 RE: Planning Application # PL20240007332 203 Goodland Dr. E (PID #66680320005) Goodland FL, 34140 Dear Property Owner: Please be advised that the owner of the above property has made a formal application to Collier County for a variance from the requirements of the zoning regulations as they apply to the following described property: 203 Goodland Dr. E (Identifiable by PID # 66680320005) Goodland FL, 34140 Also known as: Pettit Lot 13 and OR 608 Pg 1722 A/K/A unrecorded parcel 14 OR 1508 Pg 322 It is our intent to ask the County to allow us a variance from Land Development Code Section 5.03.06.E.6 to reduce the required side yard riparian setback of 7.5 feet to 0 feet from both riparian lines for a dock facility on a lot with less than 60 feet of water frontage on the aforementioned property. You are encouraged to contact the sender of this letter in the event you would like additional explanation or further information. In any event, please be advised that we are interested in assuring you that our request should not adversely affect your property interest. Please direct all questions and inquiries to Nick Pearson of Bayshore Marine Consulting, LLC, reachable via telephone at 239-404-7982 or via email at Nick@Bayshoremarineconsulting.com. Any mailed comments or questions can be sent to the address in the letterhead. Sincerely, Nick Pearson Bayshore Marine Consulting, LLC Page 488 of 590 NOTES:THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTINGPURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDEDFOR CONSTRUCTION USE.LATITUDE:N 25.9263092LONGITUDE:W -81.6448954SITE ADDRESS:203 GOODLAND DR. EGOODLAND, FL 34140CREATED:JOB NO.:DESIGNED:C:\Bayshore Marine Consulting\2411 - Aquamarine-Noble, 203 Goodland Dr. E\CAD\CC\Collier variance set.dwg LOCATION MAP 6/21/2024SHEET NO.:01 OF 04LOCATION MAPNOBLE DOCK241106-11-24N.S.P.COLLIER COUNTYSUBJECT PROPERTYSTATE OF FLORIDANESWPID #:66680320005SECTION:18TOWNSHIP:52 SCOUNTY:COLLIERRANGE:27 EGOODLANDMARCO ISLANDPage 489 of 590 PROPERTYBOUNDARYEXISTING FIXED DOCKSCALE IN FEET8040200CREATED:JOB NO.:DESIGNED:C:\Bayshore Marine Consulting\2411 - Aquamarine-Noble, 203 Goodland Dr. E\CAD\CC\Collier variance set.dwg EXISTING CONDITIONS 6/21/2024SHEET NO.:NESWN.S.P.06-11-24241102 OF 04NOBLE DOCKEXISTING CONDITIONS·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPRX. LF):·EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPRX. SF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPRX. LF):NOTES:·EXISTING PROTRUSION FROM MHWL:2076100'20'SITE ADDRESS:203 E. GOODLAND DR.34140,GOODLANDFLGOODLAND DR. EPETIT DR.RIPARIAN LINERIPARIANLINEPLATTED WATERWAYBOUNDARY41' 45'20'20'MHWLEXISTING RIP RAPEXISTINGNEIGHBORINGDOCKS20'100'55'100'55'4'5' SIDESETBACK10' SIDESETBACK7.5' RIPARIANSETBACKSPage 490 of 590 C:\Bayshore Marine Consulting\2411 - Aquamarine-Noble, 203 Goodland Dr. E\CAD\CC\Collier variance set.dwg 6/21/2024AA04PROPERTYBOUNDARYSCALE IN FEET201050CREATED:JOB NO.:DESIGNED:C:\Bayshore Marine Consulting\2411 - Aquamarine-Noble, 203 Goodland Dr. E\CAD\CC\Collier variance set.dwg PROPOSED DOCK 6/21/2024SHEET NO.:NESWPROPOSED PROJECTNOBLE DOCK03 OF 04241106-11-24N.S.P.PROPOSED DOCKAND BOATLIFTSRIPARIAN LINEESTIMATEDRIPARIAN LINE·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPRX. LF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPRX):NOTES:·PROPOSED OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPRX SF):·TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM MHWL:33150100205'12.5'7'EXISTINGNEIGHBORINGDOCKEXISTINGNEIGHBORINGDOCKSMHWLPLATTED WATERWAYBOUNDARY0.5' SIDESETBACK0.5' SIDESETBACK33' MAX. PROTRUSION FROM MHWL 30' 31'20'EXISTINGRIP RAPPage 491 of 590 C:\Bayshore Marine Consulting\2411 - Aquamarine-Noble, 203 Goodland Dr. E\CAD\CC\Collier variance set.dwg 6/21/2024DIMENSIONS SHOWN AREAPPROXIMATED BASED OFFTHE AERIAL IMAGE AND ARESUBJECT TO MINOR ERRORSCALE IN FEET200100500CREATED:JOB NO.:DESIGNED:C:\Bayshore Marine Consulting\2411 - Aquamarine-Noble, 203 Goodland Dr. E\CAD\CC\Collier variance set.dwg ADJACENT DOCKS 6/21/2024SHEET NO.:NESWADJACENT DOCKSNOBLE DOCK04 OF 04241106-11-24N.S.P.95' 22' 28'74'3 0 ' 24'23'19'26'33'Page 492 of 590 1NAME1 NAME2 NAME3 NAME4 NAME5 NAME6 LEGAL1 LEGAL2 LEGAL3 LEGAL4 FOLIO ADDRESSTYPE205 GOODLAND LLC 307 PETTIT DRGOODLAND, FL 34140---0 PETTIT LOT 14 + N1/2 OF LOT 1566680360007 U205 GOODLAND LLC PO BOX 12GOODLAND, FL 34140---0 18 52 27 PARCEL IN LOT 14 AS DESC IN DB 47 PG 10301057400005 U311 PETITT DRIVE TRUST 824 HILLCREST DRBRADENTON, FL 34209---0 18 52 27 E 60FT OF FOLL DESC PROP, COMM NW CNR OF PETTIT SUBD W 14FT TO POB, E 135FT, N 64FT, W 91FT, SWLY 100FT TO 01057240003 UBELCZAK, KENNETH J & DONNA H 6912 NICHOLS LANEJOHNSTOWN, OH 43031---0 18 52 27 PARCEL IN LOT 14, DB 46-42501057320004 UBELCZAK, KENNETH J & DONNA H 6912 NICHOLS LANEJOHNSTOWN, OH 43031---0 18 52 27 PARCEL IN LOT 14, DB 47 PG 5101057760004 UBELCZAK, KENNETH J & DONNA H 6912 NICHOLS LANEJOHNSTOWN, OH 43031---0 PETTIT LOTS 7 + 866680160003 UCARTWRIGHT JR, JOHN PO BOX 32GOODLAND, FL 34140---32 PETTIT LOT 2 & 3; AND PORTION OF LOT 1 AS DESC IN OR 5636 PG 123266680080002 UCARTWRIGHT, JOHN A PO BOX 692GOODLAND, FL 34140---692 PETTIT LOT 1 + THAT PORT OF VACATED PETTIT DR OR 564 PG 781 OR 926 PG 538, LESS PORT AS DESC IN OR 5636 PG 1232 66680040000 UCOLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 PETTIT LOTS 4-6 AND THAT PORT- ION OF 30FT VACATED ALLEY AS DESC IN OR 4545 PG 1554 BY RESOL 10-53 66680120001 UCOLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 PETTIT LOTS 9 + 1066680200002 UJUERGEN M TESSARZIK REV TRUST ILSE E TESSARZIK REV TRUST PO BOX 65 GOODLAND, FL 34140---0 18 52 27 COMM SE CNR PETIT PROP, N31 DEG W 253.4FT, N39 DEG W175FT, S 64 DEG W100FT, N39 DEG W35 FT TO POB, N39 01057480106 UJUERGEN M TESSARZIK REV TRUST ILSE E TESSARZIK REV TRUST PO BOX 65 GOODLAND, FL 34140---65 18 52 27 NORTHERLY 40FT OF PROP DESC AS COMM SE CNR PETIT PROP, N31 DEG W 253.4FT, N39 W 175FT, S64 DEGW 100FT, 01057480009 UMILLER, MARY M & JACK H PO BOX 521GOODLAND, FL 34140---521 PETTIT S1/2 OF LOT 15 + ALL LOT 1666680400006 UNANCY M CRITTENDEN REV TR PO BOX 158GOODLAND, FL 34140---0 18 52 27 TWO PARCELS IN LOT 14 OR 916 PG 162801056520009 UNOBLE & NOBLE INVESTMENTS LLC 24556 BETTS POND RD MILLSBORO, DE 19966---0 PETTIT LOT 13 AND OR 608 PG 1722 A/K/A UNREC'D PARCEL 14 OR 1508 PG 322 66680320005 USEAMAN III, HARRY & LOREN B PO BOX 756GOODLAND, FL 34140---756 18 52 27 PARCEL IN LOT 14, DB. 48-317 DESC AS:COMM AT NW CNR PETTIT SUB, S88DEG E 121FT & POB, S88DEG E 100FT, N 50FT, 01057280005 USHORT, TAMMY 475 15TH STREET SW NAPLES, FL 34117---0 18 52 27 PARCEL SE OF CANAL NW OF DESC IN DB 14- 255, SW1/4 OF BAY, N OF DR IN PETTIT SUB + E OF JOSEPH P 01057440007 USTOLLE, DAVE PO BOX 751026DAYTON, OH 45475---1026 18 52 27 PARCEL BOUNDED BY YOURSTONE AS IN DB. 51-292, GOODLAND BAY + CANAL 01056400006 USTOLLE, DAVID L PO BOX 751026DAYTON, OH 45475---1026 18 52 27 TWO PARCELS IN LOT 14 DESC IN OR 1836 PG 165501056480000 UTESSARZIK, JUERGEN M TERRENCE TESSARZIK PO BOX 65 GOODLAND, FL 34140---65 18 52 27 PARCEL B DESC AS: COMM AT SE CNR OF PETTIT SUB,S 88DEG E 197.3FT N 31DEG W 253.15FT, N 35DEG W 105FT, & 01057560000 UTESSARZIK, TERRY & AMANDA PO BOX 12GOODLAND, FL 34140---0 18 52 27 LOTS IN GOVT LOT 14 DESC IN DB 10-320 + DB 11-435 + 14-243 + DB 14-244 +DB 10 PG 316 FUTHER DESC AS: BEG AT PT 01057600009 UNotice: This data belongs to the Collier County Property Appraiser's Office (CCPA). Therefore, the recipient agrees not to represent this data to anyone as other than CCPA provided data. The recipient may not transfer this data to others without consent from the CCPA.Petition: PL20240007332 | Buffer: 150' | Date: 9/20/24 | Site Location: 66680320005POList_150 (1)Page 493 of 590 Page 494 of 590 Boundary Survey Page 495 of 590 PETTIT DRIVE FND 1 2" IR, NO IDS88°07'30"E 246.00'RADIAL LINESET 5 8" IRC ,LB7324 WITNESS CORNER SET 5 8" IRC, LB7324 MHWL LOCATED 4/3/24 EL: 0.67' NAVD 88 POINT OF COMMENCEMENT NW'LY CORNER OF PETTIT SUB. FND 5/8" IR, NO ID 10.00'10.00'9.00'10.00'S88°07'30"E 20.00'N01°52'30"E 21.81'N76°33' 5 0 " W 18.17' ( D ) 1 8 . 5 8 ' ( C )S01°52'30"W 24.89'N01°52'30"E 19.00'S01°52'30"W 20.00'L: 1.83' R: 130.00' Δ: 0°48'21"N12°37'49"EDOCK PARCEL BOUNDARY LINE (TYP) LEGEND: (C) CALCULATED CCR COLLIER COUNTY RECORDS C/L CENTER LINE (D) DEED FND FOUND IR(C) IRON ROD (& CAP) LB LICENSED BUSINESS MHW(L) MEAN HIGH WATER (LINE) MLW(L) MEAN LOW WATER (LINE) NAVD 88 NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 ORB OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK PG PAGE PSM PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER TYP TYPICAL SPECIFIC PURPOSE SURVEY SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 52 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AQUA MARINECONSTRUCTIONTERRAQUATIC, INCPREPARED FOR / SITE ADDRESSPREPARED BY:DATE: 7/29/24DRAWING: 203 GOODLAND DR PERMIT.dwgDRAWN BY: BLSCALE: 1" = 10'JOB No.: 24-1836CHECKED BY: JRLSHEET 1 OF 2REV: 7/29/24 UPDATED NOTES PER CNTY CMNTS.CERTIFICATION: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ATTACHED SPECIFIC PURPOSE SURVEY IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF AS SURVEYED UNDER MY DIRECTION ON 4/3/24. I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT THIS SPECIFIC PURPOSE SURVEY MEETS THE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE AS SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 5J-17 ADOPTED BY THE FLORIDA BOARD OF SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS PURSUANT TO FLORIDA STATUTE 472.027.JOSHUA LEE, PSM - FLORIDA REGISTRATION NUMBER 7322 VICINITY MAPS NOT TO SCALE PROJECTLOCATION SURVEY SITE SURVEY NOTES: 1. THIS IS A SPECIFIC PURPOSE SURVEY AS DEFINED IN THE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE FOR SURVEYING AND MAPPING IN CHAPTER 5J-17 FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. 2. THIS SURVEY IS CERTIFIED TO AQUA MARINE CONSTRUCTION, BAYSHORE MARINE CONSULTING AND NOBLE & NOBLE INVESTMENTS, LLC. 3. THIS SURVEY IS INTENDED EXCLUSIVELY FOR THE USE BY THOSE TO WHOM IT IS CERTIFIED. IT IS NOT TO BE USED BY OTHERS FOR CONSTRUCTION, PERMITTING, DESIGN OR ANY OTHER USE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF TERRAQUATIC, INC. 4. THIS SURVEY, AND ANY REPRODUCTION THEREOF, IS NOT VALID WITHOUT AN ORIGINAL OR VERIFIED DIGITAL SIGNATURE AND SEAL OF A FLORIDA REGISTERED SURVEYOR. ADDITIONALLY, THIS SURVEY IS NOT VALID IF PRINTED BEARING A DIGITAL SIGNATURE AND SEAL. 5. OTHER THAN THOSE SHOWN ON THE REFERENCED PLAT, NO SEARCH OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS WAS PERFORMED FOR EASEMENTS, ENCUMBRANCES OR OTHER INSTRUMENTS OF RECORD WHICH MAY AFFECT THIS PARCEL OF LAND. 6. THIS MAP IS INTENDED TO BE DISPLAYED AT A SCALE OF 1 INCH = 20 FEET OR SMALLER. 7. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WERE NOT LOCATED AS PART OF THIS SURVEY. 8. BEARING AND DISTANCES SHOWN HERON ARE RELATIVE TO THE NORTH AMERICA DATUM OF 1983, 1990 ADJUSTMENT (NAD 83/90), FLORIDA STATE PLANE, EAST ZONE (0901), TRANSVERSE MERCATOR PROJECTION IN THE U.S. SURVEY FOOT UNIT OF MEASUREMENT. 9. BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE RELATIVE TO A GRID BEARING OF S88°07'30"E ALONG THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF PETTIT SUBDIVISION PER OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 321, PAGE 2572 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY PUBLIC RECORDS. 10. LOCATIONS WERE OBTAINED USING REAL TIME KINEMATIC GPS METHODOLOGIES WITH BROADCAST CORRECTIONS FROM THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION REFERENCE NETWORK AND ARE ACCURATE TO THIRD ORDER, CLASS II. 11. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, FIELD BEARINGS AND DISTANCES ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE RECORD DEED. 12. THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE OF THIS SURVEY IS TO PROVIDE THE NECESSARY INFORMATION FOR A DOCK PERMIT. 13. THE BOUNDARY INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON IS LIMITED TO THE "AND" PARCEL LYING IN GOVERNMENT LOT 14 AS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 6321 AT PAGE 2572, OF THE COLLIER COUNTY PUBLIC RECORDS, AND HEREIN REFERRED TO AS THE "DOCK PARCEL". AS SUCH, LOT 13, AS DESCRIBED IN SAID DEED, IS NOT PART OF THIS SURVEY. LEGAL DESCRIPTION (RECORD DEED, O.R.B. 6321, PG. 2572, C.C.R.) LOT 13, OF PETTIT SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 2, PAGE 88, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND A PARCEL LYING IN GOVERNMENT LOT 14, SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 52 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, TALLAHASSEE MERIDIAN, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS: COMMENCING AT A 4" X 4" CONCRETE MONUMENT WITH A 3/4" GALVANIZED IRON PIPE MARKING THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF PETTIT SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 2, PAGE 88, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROCEED SOUTH 88° 07' 30" EAST FOLLOWING THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID PETTIT SUBDIVISION FOR 246.00 FEET TO A 3/4" GALVANIZED IRON PIPE,THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE SOUTH 88° 07' 30" EAST FOLLOWING SAID BOUNDARY 20.00 FEET TO A 3/4" GALVANIZED IRON PIPE; THENCE RUN NORTH 1° 52' 30" EAST FOR 19.00 FEET TO A 3/4" GALVANIZED IRON PIPE ON THE BANK OF A CANAL FROM GOODLAND BAY; THENCE CONTINUE NORTH 1° 52' 30" EAST FOR 21.81 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID CANAL; THENCE PROCEED WESTERLY FOLLOWING THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID CANAL ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 130.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00° 48' 21" FOR A DISTANCE OF 1.83 FEET TO POINT OF TANGENCY, THE TANGENT AT LAST AFORESAID POINT OF BEARING NORTH 77° 22' 11" WEST; THENCE CONTINUE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY CANAL BOUNDARY NORTH 76° 33' 50" WEST FOR 18.17 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE RUN SOUTH 01° 52' 30" WEST FOR 24.89 FEET TO A 3/4" GALVANIZED IRON PIPE ON SAID CANAL BANK; SAID PIPE BEING NORTH 85° 16' 30" WEST 20.04 FEET FROM LAST AFORESAID 3/4" GALVANIZED IRON PIPE ON SAID CANAL BANK; THENCE CONTINUE SOUTH 01° 52' 30" WEST FOR 20.00 FEET TO POINT OF BEGINNING.    HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1" = 10' 10'5'0' Page 496 of 590 3.1'·3.2'·3.1'·3.1'·3.2'·3. 3 '·3. 5 '·3.8'·3.2'·2.5'·1.6'·0.5'·0.3'·0.7'·0.4'·0.0'·0.9'·1.6'·2.1'·2.8'·3.4'·3.4'·3. 3 '·3.3'·3.2'·3.1'·3.1'·2.9'·2.8'·2.6'·2.7'·2.0'·2.4'·2.8'·2.7'·2.9'·3.0'·3.2'·3. 1 '·3.3'·3.2'·3.3'·3.3'·3.3'·3.4'·3. 3 '·3.5'·3.1'·3.1'·2.5'·2.5'·1.8'·1.9'·1.3'·1.4'·0.6'·0.7'·0.1'·0.5'·   HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1" = 20' 20'10'0'TERRAQUATIC, INCPREPARED BY:DRAWN BY: BLSCALE: 1" = 20' CHECKED BY: JRLSHEET 2 OF 2REV:AQUA MARINECONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FOR / SITE ADDRESSDATE: 7/29/24DRAWING: 203 GOODLAND DR PERMIT.dwgJOB No.: 24-1836DETAIL (N.T.S.) HYDROGRAPHIC DATA ARE RELATIVE TO MEAN LOW WATER. DATUMS PROVIDED BY THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION LOCAL VERTICAL DATUM DIAGRAM NAVD-88 MLW -1.88' MHW +0.67' Page 497 of 590 Historical Aerial Imagery Page 498 of 590 Page 499 of 590 Page 500 of 590 1 John Kelly From:Sean Sammon Sent:Tuesday, November 26, 2024 10:24 AM To:John Kelly Subject:FW: 203 Goodland Dr Attachments:20241126_091432.jpg; 20241126_091421.jpg; 20241126_091412.jpg John, Here’s your 203 goodland pics, you may want to crop my finger out of the close up photo. This property is so rocky, I found a spot that the sign could go halfway in, hope it holds. Sean Sammon Planner III Zoning Office:239-252-8422 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Sean.Sammon@colliercountyfl.gov From: Sean Sammon <ssback39@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2024 10:19 AM To: Sean Sammon <Sean.Sammon@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: 203 Goodland Dr EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Attached Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Page 501 of 590 Page 502 of 590 Page 503 of 590 December 5, 2024 To whom it may concern, In regards to :VA-PL20240007332 and BD-PL20240003998 - 203 Goodland Drive E I am writing on behalf of the adjacent neighboring parcel 01057400005- 205 Goodland Drive East, located immediately east of the site location for the referenced petition. The submitted drawings, for the stated location, are not at all favorable for us/ our property, and we oppose those plans. We oppose those plans, due to the fact that they are requesting a .5’ setback for the proposed dock facility- leaving us barley enough space to slip in a kayak, on the west side of our existing dock. Leaving the west side of our dock inaccessible. We had met with the owner, Noble & Noble LLC, and have come to an agreement to a change in the plans. The agreement in the redesign on the referenced petition, is labeled as the “alternate design”. As it shows, in the “alternate design”, the setbacks that would be considered for VA-PL20240007332 have increased, allowing us (205 Goodland Dr) more room, to be able to continue to have access to the west side of our dock. We understand the logistics of the county setbacks, and as property owners, we believe in the rules for the setbacks, and respect those rules. Also, we understand why variances are granted, in some cases. We are additionally concerned regarding the dock extension : BD-PL20240003998. We are concerned that the proposed extension, will limit the ability to maneuver into our boat slip, when the many factors of boating present themselves: wind, tide, currents, etc. We don’t necessarily oppose the extension, but have concerns that it will negatively impact the in and out of our access on the west side of our dock. We feel the importance of this letter, is for the Hearing Examiner to take the “alternate design” plan, that we (property owners) have agreed on, into consideration, when making a decision. To be sure that the new/ alternate plan is the plan that gets considered, and be “THE PLAN” rather then the plan that has been initially submitted. Thank you Terry Tessarzik Hank Seaman Amanda Tessarzik 205 Goodland Dr East Page 504 of 590 VA-PL20240007332 203 E Goodland Drive Attachment Fl Letter of Objection T , i ore WAY �:jiiii • All / nl , A. U4nlitlE. g•-i 2:-. 4 '4'41•-J:4:: ' V Mi ff TI y —41'tibt, i. . 1_ i K. ,/ 460 '414' 4 • • is 8 • • .. Umt;fil ii. ! . • -•t°- Unit-.3 - - AL-GL0 • _ Pettit DR i- i5 '` 4 l06 "vy '. .. Goo • • J• t • r -! 39 Ezc:; ` • 208 y h V. 37• •� � u)YFLrm ) : 7. . Iiiiie _ . , F ` 4.1 O 311 Pettit Drive, Keyla and Rick Smotryski John Kelly From: Keyla Smotryski <keylasmotryski@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, December 6, 2024 9:18 AM To: John Kelly Subject: RE: VA-PL20240007332 and BD-PL20240003998 - 203 Goodland Drive E - Objections EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Good morning, Mr. Kelly, We are one of the property owners near the requested variance. We are opposed to the variance and have many concerns about it if granted. This is an excessive ask and an intrusive design. In negotiations, the developer often asks for something unreasonable, hoping the county will counter by giving up something smaller. This may be the case here, as the variance is so significant as to be unreasonable. This is bad behavior and should not be reinforced. We do not feel the variance is necessary. It will restrict neighboring properties to such an extent that all neighbors will come clamoring to the county for a similar variance. It sets a bad precedent. Please forward my email to whoever you think is necessary and register our objection. Thank you for your time. Keyla and Rick Smotryski 311 Pettit Drive Trust i 12/12/2024 Item # 3.G ID# 2024-2153 PETITION NO. BD-PL20240003998 – 203 Goodland Dr. E – Request for a 13-foot boat dock extension, over the maximum 20 feet allowed by Section 5.03.06.E.1 of the Collier County Land Development Code for waterways 100 feet or greater in width, to construct a new dock facility that will protrude a total of 33 feet into a waterway that is 100± feet wide. The subject property is an unplatted boat dock lot deeded with and located north and immediately across Pettit Drive from 203 Goodland Drive East in Section 18, Township 52 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. (Companion to VA- PL20240007332) (Coordinator: John Kelly, Planner III) (Commissioner District 1) ATTACHMENTS: 1. Staff Report BD-PL20240003998 11202024 2. Attachment A - Legal Description 3. Attachment B - Site and Dock Plans 4. Attachment C - Map of Specific Purpose Survey 5. Attachment D - Applicant's Backup 6. Attachment E - Sign Posting 11262024 7. Attachment F - Letters of Objection Page 505 of 590 BDE-PL20240003998, 203 Goodland Dr E Page 1 of 8 November 20, 2024 STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FROM: ZONING DIVISION – ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: DECEMBER 12, 2024 SUBJECT: BD-PL20240003998, 203 GOODLAND DRIVE EAST – GOODLAND, COMPANION TO VA-PL20240007332 ____________________________________________________________________________ PROPERTY OWNER/APPLICANT: AGENT: Noble & Noble Investments, LLC Nick Pearson 24556 Betts Pond Rd Bayshore Marine Consulting, LLC Millsboro, DE 19966 2025 Monroe Ave. Naples, FL 34112 REQUESTED ACTION: The petitioner is requesting a 13-foot boat dock extension from the maximum permitted protrusion of 20 feet allowed by Section 5.03.06.E.1 of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) for waterways greater than 100 feet in width to allow a new boat docking facility that will protrude a total of 33 feet into a waterway that is 100± feet wide pursuant to LDC Section 5.03.06.H. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is an unplatted boat dock lot deeded with and located north and immediately across Petit Drive from 203 Goodland Drive East in Section 18, Township 52 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. (see location map on the following page) PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The subject property comprises 0.13 acres and is located in a Residential Single-Family-4 (RSF-4) Zoning District within the Goodland Zoning Overlay (GZO), which has historically been used as a boat dock lot that is deeded with an upland single-family dwelling directly across the road; see Attachment A – Legal Description. The petitioner desires to remove the existing dock facility and construct a new docking facility comprising a 5-foot by 30-foot-long finger pier with a single boat lift for the mooring of a 31-foot vessel. The subject portion of the property has a 20-foot riprap shoreline, which requires side/riparian setbacks of 7.5 feet. A companion Variance is required as the petitioner desires to reduce the side/riparian setbacks to zero. The driving factor for the requested protrusion is limited water depth. Page 506 of 590 BDE-PL20240003998, 203 Goodland Dr E Page 2 of 8 November 20, 2024 Page 507 of 590 BDE-PL20240003998, 203 Goodland Dr E Page 3 of 8 November 20, 2024 SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: North: Waterway/canal then unimproved property within an RSF-4-GZO zoning district East: Goodland Drive East (Right-of-Way), then a single-family residence located within an RSF-4-GZO zoning district South: A single-family residence located within an RSF-4-GZO zoning district West: A single-family residence located within an RSF-4-GZO zoning district Aerial (Collier County GIS) Page 508 of 590 BDE-PL20240003998, 203 Goodland Dr E Page 4 of 8 November 20, 2024 Aerial (Collier County GIS) ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION: Environmental Planning Staff has reviewed this petition and has no objection to granting this request. The proposed docking facilities will be constructed waterward of the existing rip-rapped shoreline. The applicant's submerged resources survey found no submerged resources in the area; the exhibit sheet, page 6 of 8, provides an aerial with a note stating that no seagrasses were observed within 200 feet. This project does not require an Environmental Advisory Council Board (EAC) review because this project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Chapter 2, Article VIII, Division 23, Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. STAFF ANALYSIS: In accordance with LDC Section 5.03.06.H., the Collier County Hearing Examiner shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny a dock facility extension request based on certain criteria. In order for the Hearing Examiner to approve this request, at least four of the five primary criteria and four of the six secondary criteria must be met: Primary Criteria: 1. Whether the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate in relation to the waterfront length, location, upland land use and zoning of the subject property. Consideration should be made of property on unbridged barrier islands, Page 509 of 590 BDE-PL20240003998, 203 Goodland Dr E Page 5 of 8 November 20, 2024 where vessels are the primary means of transportation to and from the property. (The number should be appropriate; typical single-family use should be no more than two slips; typical multi-family use should be one slip per dwelling unit; in the case of unbridged barrier island docks, additional slips may be appropriate.) Criterion met. The subject property is located within a residential single-family zoning district; the proposed docking facility comprises a finger pier with a single boat lift for the mooring of a single vessel. 2. Whether the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the general length, type, and draft as described in the petitioner’s application is unable to launch or moor at mean low tide (MLT). (The petitioner’s application and survey should establish that the water depth is too shallow to allow launching and mooring of the vessel(s) described without an extension.) Criterion met. The applicant’s agent states: “Most boatlifts vary between 10 feet and 15 feet in length and width on the lift pile centers. If a lift of this general size were installed inside the 20-foot protrusion limit per the Collier County LDC, this lift would be placed in a maximum of approximately 2.2 feet of water at low tide per exhibit 04 of 08. This depth of water (at low tide) is not sufficient to allow ingress or egress of the applicant’s vessel from a boatlift, as most vessels of this size require about 1.5 feet to 2 feet of water above the lift bunks in order to launch.” Zoning staff concurs and notes that the existing dock facility is to be removed and replaced by the proposed facility. 3. Whether the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation within an adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. (The facility should not intrude into any marked or charted navigable channel thus impeding vessel traffic in the channel.) Criterion met. The applicant’s agent states: “There is no marked or charted channel at or adjacent to the project location. Therefore, no marked or charted channels will be affected by the proposed project.” Zoning staff concurs. 4. Whether the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25 percent of the width of the waterway and whether a minimum of 50 percent of the waterway width between dock facilities on either side is maintained for navigability. (The facility should maintain the required percentages.) Criterion not met. The applicant’s agent states: “The width of the waterway at this location between property lines is approximately 68 feet wide. However, the actual Mean High-Water Line (MHWL) to MHWL measurement is significantly larger at 100 feet. The applicant is proposing a dock and vessel that will protrude 33 feet into the waterway from the MHWL, which exceeds the 25% criteria. However, only 7 feet of protrusion will occur outside the applicant’s property boundary, which does not exceed the 25% criteria. Identifying whether this criterion is met or not is, therefore, somewhat problematic because it depends on how the waterway is being measured. And, whichever waterway measurement is utilized, 50% of the waterway will remain for navigation. In the interest of being conservative, this petition will Page 510 of 590 BDE-PL20240003998, 203 Goodland Dr E Page 6 of 8 November 20, 2024 consider this criterion as being not met unless county staff opine otherwise.” Zoning staff concurs. 5. Whether the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the facility would not interfere with the use of neighboring docks. (The facility should not interfere with the use of legally permitted neighboring docks.) Criterion met. The applicant’s agent states: “This dock facility is oriented in the same direction as the neighboring docks along this portion of the waterway, which is in a shore-normal configuration. Neither the proposed side setbacks nor the proposed protrusion is atypical for the area, and no neighboring docks should be affected by the project as proposed.” Zoning staff concurs. Secondary Criteria: 1. Whether there are special conditions not involving water depth related to the subject property or waterway that justify the proposed dimensions and location of the proposed dock facility. (There must be at least one special condition related to the property; these may include type of shoreline reinforcement, shoreline configuration, mangrove growth, or seagrass beds.) Criterion met. The applicant’s agent states: “The parcel on which the proposed project is located is an unconventional sized lot that is too small for a principal structure to be located and is intended essentially exclusively for the use of boat mooring. The lot is also too narrow (especially considering the standard 7.5 foot side setbacks from both riparian lines) to reasonably moor a boat in a shore normal configuration, which all but requires mooring in a configuration A, shore normal configuration within the standard protrusion limit per the Collier County’s LDC limits the property owner to mooring boats of 20 feet LOA or less, which severely restricts the overall and intended use of the lot. Furthermore, numerous of the adjacent boat slip lots already have docks with similar configurations, protrusions, and provided side setbacks.” Zoning staff notes that the subject property is not the only “boat dock lot” in the immediate vicinity and concurs that all such lots are too small to support an allowable principal structure; however, staff did not research how use was authorized as in the case of the subject property it is deeded with an upland structure immediately across Pettit Drive. The fact that the two properties are deeded together essentially creates a single lot despite being split by a street; therefore, the required principal use is on the upland portion of the subject property, and the accessory residential dock use is subsequently allowed. Staff concurs that the above constitutes a special condition and, therefore, concurs with the applicant’s agent. 2. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe access to the vessel for loading/unloading and routine maintenance, without the use of excessive deck area not directly related to these functions. (The facility should not use excessive deck area.) Criterion met. The applicant’s agent states: “The proposed facility will utilize a single 5-foot wide by 30-foot-long area of decking, which totals 150 total square feet. This square footage is substantially less than many of the surrounding docks and is, in our opinion, not excessive.” Zoning staff concurs. Page 511 of 590 BDE-PL20240003998, 203 Goodland Dr E Page 7 of 8 November 20, 2024 3. For single-family dock facilities, whether the length of the vessel or vessels in combination described by the petitioner exceeds 50 percent of the subject property’s linear waterfront footage. (The applicable maximum percentage should be maintained.) Criterion not met. The subject property has only 20 feet of water frontage, and the proposed dock facility was designed to accommodate a single 31-foot LOA vessel, which exceeds the 50 percent threshold. However, Zoning staff notes that this lot has historically been used as a nonconforming boat dock lot. 4. Whether the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view of neighboring property owners. (The facility should not have a major impact on the view of a neighboring property owner.) Criterion met. The applicant’s agent states: “The proposed dock configuration is the same as the existing structure, only 10 feet longer (13 feet with the vessel included). This design will remain in line with the neighboring docking facilities. Additionally, the use of the facility for private recreational purposes will be consistent with the surrounding area as well. Therefore, the proposed project should not constitute a major impact to views of the neighbors.” Zoning staff concurs. 5. Whether seagrass beds will be impacted by the proposed dock facility. (If seagrass beds are present, compliance with subsection 5.03.06.J of the LDC must be demonstrated.) Criterion met. The submerged resources survey provided indicates that no seagrass beds exist within the footprint of the dock. No seagrass beds will be impacted by the proposed dock facility. 6. Whether the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of subsection 5.03.06(E)(11) of this Code. (If applicable, compliance with section 5.03.06(E)(11) must be demonstrated.) Criterion is not applicable. The provisions of the Collier County Manatee Protection Plan do not apply to single-family dock facilities except for those within the sea-walled basin of Port of the Islands; the subject property is not located within Port of the Islands. Staff analysis finds that the subject BDE petition satisfies four of the five Primary Criteria and four of the six Secondary Criteria with the sixth criterion being not applicable. CONCURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS: • Variance, PL20240007332, to allow the side/riparian setback to be reduced to zero on both sides of the subject dock facility. Page 512 of 590 BDE-PL20240003998, 203 Goodland Dr E Page 8 of 8 November 20, 2024 APPEAL OF BOAT DOCK EXTENSION TO BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS: As to any boat dock extension petition upon which the Hearing Examiner takes action, an aggrieved petitioner may appeal such final action. Such appeal shall be filed per Section 2-88 of the Collier County Code of Ordinances within 30 days of the Decision by the Hearing Examiner. An aggrieved non-party may appeal a decision of the Hearing Examiner to the Circuit Court of Collier County within 30 days of the decision. In the event that the petition has been approved by the Hearing Examiner, the applicant shall be advised that he/she proceed with construction at his/her own risk during this 30-day period. Any construction work completed ahead of the approval authorization shall be at their own risk. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Based on the above findings, staff recommends that the Hearing Examiner APPROVE Petition BD- PL20240003998 to allow for the construction of the proposed dock facility as depicted within the plans contained in Attachment B subject to the following conditions of approval: 1. Approval is predicated upon the approval of the companion Variance, PL20240007332, by the Hearing Examiner; absent such approval, this BE is void. 2. Prior to or concurrent with obtaining a building permit for the dock, a Right-of-Way permit shall be obtained for access improvements to prevent damage to the roadway and drainage system if not previously obtained. 3. This dock is private in nature and shall not be used for rental purposes. 4. This dock shall not be used for any commercial purposes, including the mooring of commercial boats, unless specifically permitted within the Goodland Zoning Overlay (GZO). Attachments: A.Legal Description B.Site and Dock Plans C.Map of Specific Purpose Survey D.Applicant’s Backup; application and supporting documents E.Public Hearing Sign Posting F.Letters of Objection Page 513 of 590 Legal Description LOT 13, OF PETTIT SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 2, PAGE 88, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND A PARCEL LYING IN GOVERNMENT LOT 14, SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 52 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, TALLAHASSEE MERIDIAN, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS: COMMENCING AT A 4" X 4" CONCRETE MONUMENT WITH A 3/4" GALVANIZED IRON PIPE MARKING THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF PETTIT SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 2, PAGE 88, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROCEED SOUTH 88° 07' 30" EAST FOLLOWING THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID PETTIT SUBDIVISION FOR 246.00 FEET TO A 3/4" GALVANIZED IRON PIPE, THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE SOUTH 88° 07' 30" EAST FOLLOWING SAID BOUNDARY 20.00 FEET TO A 3/4" GALVANIZED IRON PIPE; THENCE RUN NORTH 1° 52' 30" EAST FOR 19.00 FEET TO A 3/4" GALVANIZED IRON PIPE ON THE BANK OF A CANAL FROM GOODLAND BAY; THENCE CONTINUE NORTH 1° 52' 30" EAST FOR 21.81 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID CANAL; THENCE PROCEED WESTERLY FOLLOWING THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID CANAL ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 130.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00° 48' 21" FOR A DISTANCE OF 1.83 FEET TO POINT OF TANGENCY, THE TANGENT AT LAST AFORESAID POINT OF BEARING NORTH 77° 22' 11" WEST; THENCE CONTINUE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY CANAL BOUNDARY NORTH 76° 33' 50" WEST FOR 18.17 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE RUN SOUTH 01° 52' 30" WEST FOR 24.89 FEET TO A 3/4" GALVANIZED IRON PIPE ON SAID CANAL BANK; SAID PIPE BEING NORTH 85° 16' 30" WEST 20.04 FEET FROM LAST AFORESAID 3/4" GALVANIZED IRON PIPE ON SAID CANAL BANK; THENCE CONTINUE SOUTH 01° 52' 30" WEST FOR 20.00 FEET TO POINT OF BEGINNING. Page 514 of 590 NOTES:THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTINGPURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDEDFOR CONSTRUCTION USE.LATITUDE:N 25.9263092LONGITUDE:W -81.6448954SITE ADDRESS:203 GOODLAND DR. EGOODLAND, FL 34140CREATED:JOB NO.:DESIGNED:C:\Bayshore Marine Consulting\2411 - Aquamarine-Noble, 203 Goodland Dr. E\CAD\CC\Collier BDE set 8-1-2024.dwg LOCATION MAP 8/1/2024SHEET NO.:01 OF 08LOCATION MAPNOBLE DOCK241106-11-24N.S.P.COLLIER COUNTYSUBJECT PROPERTYSTATE OF FLORIDANESWPID #:66680320005SECTION:18TOWNSHIP:52 SCOUNTY:COLLIERRANGE:27 EGOODLANDMARCO ISLANDPage 515 of 590 0.5'3.2'3.3'1.3'0.1'3.1'3.2'3.2'0.3'·0.4'2.1'3.3'3.1'2.6'2.7'3.3'2.5'SURVEYEDPROPERTYBOUNDARYEXISTING FIXED DOCKSCALE IN FEET8040200CREATED:JOB NO.:DESIGNED:C:\Bayshore Marine Consulting\2411 - Aquamarine-Noble, 203 Goodland Dr. E\CAD\CC\Collier BDE set 8-1-2024.dwg EXISTING CONDITIONS 8/1/2024SHEET NO.:NESWN.S.P.06-11-24241102 OF 08NOBLE DOCKEXISTING CONDITIONS·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPRX. LF):·EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPRX. SF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPRX. LF):NOTES:·EXISTING PROTRUSION FROM MHWL:2076100'20'SITE ADDRESS:203 E. GOODLAND DR.34140,GOODLANDFLGOODLAND DR. EPETIT DR.RIPARIAN LINERIPARIANLINEAPPROXIMATE PROPERTYBOUNDARIES PER THEPROPERTY APPRAISER41' 45'20'20'MHWLEXISTING RIP RAPEXISTINGNEIGHBORINGDOCKS20'100'55'100'55'4'DEPTHS AT MLW19.2' 17.5'Page 516 of 590 C:\Bayshore Marine Consulting\2411 - Aquamarine-Noble, 203 Goodland Dr. E\CAD\CC\Collier BDE set 8-1-2024.dwg 8/1/2024AA04SURVEYEDPROPERTYBOUNDARYSCALE IN FEET201050CREATED:JOB NO.:DESIGNED:C:\Bayshore Marine Consulting\2411 - Aquamarine-Noble, 203 Goodland Dr. E\CAD\CC\Collier BDE set 8-1-2024.dwg PROPOSED DOCK 8/1/2024SHEET NO.:NESWPROPOSED PROJECTNOBLE DOCK03 OF 08241106-11-24N.S.P.PROPOSED DOCKAND BOATLIFTSRIPARIAN LINEESTIMATEDRIPARIAN LINE·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPRX. LF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPRX):NOTES:·PROPOSED OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPRX SF):·TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM MHWL:30150100205'12.5'7'EXISTINGNEIGHBORINGDOCKEXISTINGNEIGHBORINGDOCKSMHWLAPPROXIMATEPROPERTY BOUNDARYPER THE PROPERTYAPPRAISER0.5' SIDESETBACK0.5' SIDESETBACK33' MAX. PROTRUSION FROM MHWL 30' 31'20'EXISTINGRIP RAPPage 517 of 590 3.3'3.3' 3. 1 ' 2. 5 ' 1. 8 ' 1. 3 ' 0. 6 ' 0. 1 'PROPOSEDDOCKMHWL +0.67' NAVDMLWL -1.88' NAVDSTRINGERCAPTIMBEREXISTINGRIP RAPSCALE IN FEET1052.50CREATED:JOB NO.:DESIGNED:C:\Bayshore Marine Consulting\2411 - Aquamarine-Noble, 203 Goodland Dr. E\CAD\CC\Collier BDE set 8-1-2024.dwg CROSS SECTION AA 8/1/2024SHEET NO.:CROSS SECTION AANOBLE DOCK04 OF 08241106-11-24N.S.P.DOCK PILEDECKING33' PROTRUSIONFROM MHWLBOAT LIFTWATER DEPTHSAT MLW31'2.2'20'PROTRUSIONCONTOUR13'Page 518 of 590 SCALE IN FEET10420CREATED:JOB NO.:DESIGNED:C:\Bayshore Marine Consulting\2411 - Aquamarine-Noble, 203 Goodland Dr. E\CAD\CC\Collier BDE set 8-1-2024.dwg CROSS SECTION BB 8/1/2024SHEET NO.:CROSS SECTION BBNOBLE DOCK05 OF 08241106-11-24N.S.P.20'5'12.5'STRINGERCAPTIMBERDOCK PILEDECKINGBOAT LIFTPROPERTYBOUNDARYPROPERTYBOUNDARY3.3' AT MLW.5' PROVIDED SETBACK.5' PROVIDED SETBACKMHWL +0.67' NAVDMLWL -1.88' NAVDPage 519 of 590 C:\Bayshore Marine Consulting\2411 - Aquamarine-Noble, 203 Goodland Dr. E\CAD\CC\Collier BDE set 8-1-2024.dwg 8/1/2024PROPOSED DOCKAND BOATLIFTSTYPICALTRANSECTPROPERTYBOUNDARYSCALE IN FEET10050250CREATED:JOB NO.:DESIGNED:C:\Bayshore Marine Consulting\2411 - Aquamarine-Noble, 203 Goodland Dr. E\CAD\CC\Collier BDE set 8-1-2024.dwg SRS 8/1/2024SHEET NO.:NESWSUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEYNOBLE DOCK06 OF 08241106-11-24N.S.P.10'200'NO SEAGRASSESOBSERVED WITHINSURVEY AREAPage 520 of 590 C:\Bayshore Marine Consulting\2411 - Aquamarine-Noble, 203 Goodland Dr. E\CAD\CC\Collier BDE set 8-1-2024.dwg 8/1/2024DIMENSIONS SHOWN AREAPPROXIMATED BASED OFFTHE AERIAL IMAGE AND ARESUBJECT TO MINOR ERRORSCALE IN FEET200100500CREATED:JOB NO.:DESIGNED:C:\Bayshore Marine Consulting\2411 - Aquamarine-Noble, 203 Goodland Dr. E\CAD\CC\Collier BDE set 8-1-2024.dwg ADJACENT DOCKS 8/1/2024SHEET NO.:NESWADJACENT DOCKSNOBLE DOCK07 OF 08241106-11-24N.S.P.95' 22' 28'74'3 0 ' 24'23'19'26'33'Page 521 of 590 C:\Bayshore Marine Consulting\2411 - Aquamarine-Noble, 203 Goodland Dr. E\CAD\CC\Collier BDE set 8-1-2024.dwg 8/1/2024SCALE IN FEET8040200CREATED:JOB NO.:DESIGNED:C:\Bayshore Marine Consulting\2411 - Aquamarine-Noble, 203 Goodland Dr. E\CAD\CC\Collier BDE set 8-1-2024.dwg WATERWAY 8/1/2024SHEET NO.:NESWWATERWAY WIDTHNOBLE DOCK08 OF 08241106-11-24N.S.P.100' MH W L TO MH W L 68' BE T W E E N APPA R E N T PROP E R T Y L I N E S 48'61'Page 522 of 590 PETTIT DRIVE FND 1 2" IR, NO IDS88°07'30"E 246.00'RADIAL LINESET 5 8" IRC ,LB7324 WITNESS CORNER SET 5 8" IRC, LB7324 MHWL LOCATED 4/3/24 EL: 0.67' NAVD 88 POINT OF COMMENCEMENT NW'LY CORNER OF PETTIT SUB. FND 5/8" IR, NO ID 10.00'10.00'9.00'10.00'S88°07'30"E 20.00'N01°52'30"E 21.81'N76°33' 5 0 " W 18.17' ( D ) 1 8 . 5 8 ' ( C )S01°52'30"W 24.89'N01°52'30"E 19.00'S01°52'30"W 20.00'L: 1.83' R: 130.00' Δ: 0°48'21"N12°37'49"EDOCK PARCEL BOUNDARY LINE (TYP) LEGEND: (C) CALCULATED CCR COLLIER COUNTY RECORDS C/L CENTER LINE (D) DEED FND FOUND IR(C) IRON ROD (& CAP) LB LICENSED BUSINESS MHW(L) MEAN HIGH WATER (LINE) MLW(L) MEAN LOW WATER (LINE) NAVD 88 NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 ORB OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK PG PAGE PSM PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER TYP TYPICAL SPECIFIC PURPOSE SURVEY SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 52 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AQUA MARINECONSTRUCTIONTERRAQUATIC, INCPREPARED FOR / SITE ADDRESSPREPARED BY:DATE: 7/29/24DRAWING: 203 GOODLAND DR PERMIT.dwgDRAWN BY: BLSCALE: 1" = 10'JOB No.: 24-1836CHECKED BY: JRLSHEET 1 OF 2REV: 7/29/24 UPDATED NOTES PER CNTY CMNTS.CERTIFICATION: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ATTACHED SPECIFIC PURPOSE SURVEY IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF AS SURVEYED UNDER MY DIRECTION ON 4/3/24. I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT THIS SPECIFIC PURPOSE SURVEY MEETS THE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE AS SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 5J-17 ADOPTED BY THE FLORIDA BOARD OF SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS PURSUANT TO FLORIDA STATUTE 472.027.JOSHUA LEE, PSM - FLORIDA REGISTRATION NUMBER 7322 VICINITY MAPS NOT TO SCALE PROJECTLOCATION SURVEY SITE SURVEY NOTES: 1. THIS IS A SPECIFIC PURPOSE SURVEY AS DEFINED IN THE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE FOR SURVEYING AND MAPPING IN CHAPTER 5J-17 FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. 2. THIS SURVEY IS CERTIFIED TO AQUA MARINE CONSTRUCTION, BAYSHORE MARINE CONSULTING AND NOBLE & NOBLE INVESTMENTS, LLC. 3. THIS SURVEY IS INTENDED EXCLUSIVELY FOR THE USE BY THOSE TO WHOM IT IS CERTIFIED. IT IS NOT TO BE USED BY OTHERS FOR CONSTRUCTION, PERMITTING, DESIGN OR ANY OTHER USE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF TERRAQUATIC, INC. 4. THIS SURVEY, AND ANY REPRODUCTION THEREOF, IS NOT VALID WITHOUT AN ORIGINAL OR VERIFIED DIGITAL SIGNATURE AND SEAL OF A FLORIDA REGISTERED SURVEYOR. ADDITIONALLY, THIS SURVEY IS NOT VALID IF PRINTED BEARING A DIGITAL SIGNATURE AND SEAL. 5. OTHER THAN THOSE SHOWN ON THE REFERENCED PLAT, NO SEARCH OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS WAS PERFORMED FOR EASEMENTS, ENCUMBRANCES OR OTHER INSTRUMENTS OF RECORD WHICH MAY AFFECT THIS PARCEL OF LAND. 6. THIS MAP IS INTENDED TO BE DISPLAYED AT A SCALE OF 1 INCH = 20 FEET OR SMALLER. 7. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WERE NOT LOCATED AS PART OF THIS SURVEY. 8. BEARING AND DISTANCES SHOWN HERON ARE RELATIVE TO THE NORTH AMERICA DATUM OF 1983, 1990 ADJUSTMENT (NAD 83/90), FLORIDA STATE PLANE, EAST ZONE (0901), TRANSVERSE MERCATOR PROJECTION IN THE U.S. SURVEY FOOT UNIT OF MEASUREMENT. 9. BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE RELATIVE TO A GRID BEARING OF S88°07'30"E ALONG THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF PETTIT SUBDIVISION PER OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 321, PAGE 2572 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY PUBLIC RECORDS. 10. LOCATIONS WERE OBTAINED USING REAL TIME KINEMATIC GPS METHODOLOGIES WITH BROADCAST CORRECTIONS FROM THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION REFERENCE NETWORK AND ARE ACCURATE TO THIRD ORDER, CLASS II. 11. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, FIELD BEARINGS AND DISTANCES ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE RECORD DEED. 12. THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE OF THIS SURVEY IS TO PROVIDE THE NECESSARY INFORMATION FOR A DOCK PERMIT. 13. THE BOUNDARY INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON IS LIMITED TO THE "AND" PARCEL LYING IN GOVERNMENT LOT 14 AS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 6321 AT PAGE 2572, OF THE COLLIER COUNTY PUBLIC RECORDS, AND HEREIN REFERRED TO AS THE "DOCK PARCEL". AS SUCH, LOT 13, AS DESCRIBED IN SAID DEED, IS NOT PART OF THIS SURVEY. LEGAL DESCRIPTION (RECORD DEED, O.R.B. 6321, PG. 2572, C.C.R.) LOT 13, OF PETTIT SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 2, PAGE 88, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND A PARCEL LYING IN GOVERNMENT LOT 14, SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 52 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, TALLAHASSEE MERIDIAN, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS: COMMENCING AT A 4" X 4" CONCRETE MONUMENT WITH A 3/4" GALVANIZED IRON PIPE MARKING THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF PETTIT SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 2, PAGE 88, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROCEED SOUTH 88° 07' 30" EAST FOLLOWING THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID PETTIT SUBDIVISION FOR 246.00 FEET TO A 3/4" GALVANIZED IRON PIPE,THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE SOUTH 88° 07' 30" EAST FOLLOWING SAID BOUNDARY 20.00 FEET TO A 3/4" GALVANIZED IRON PIPE; THENCE RUN NORTH 1° 52' 30" EAST FOR 19.00 FEET TO A 3/4" GALVANIZED IRON PIPE ON THE BANK OF A CANAL FROM GOODLAND BAY; THENCE CONTINUE NORTH 1° 52' 30" EAST FOR 21.81 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID CANAL; THENCE PROCEED WESTERLY FOLLOWING THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID CANAL ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 130.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00° 48' 21" FOR A DISTANCE OF 1.83 FEET TO POINT OF TANGENCY, THE TANGENT AT LAST AFORESAID POINT OF BEARING NORTH 77° 22' 11" WEST; THENCE CONTINUE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY CANAL BOUNDARY NORTH 76° 33' 50" WEST FOR 18.17 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE RUN SOUTH 01° 52' 30" WEST FOR 24.89 FEET TO A 3/4" GALVANIZED IRON PIPE ON SAID CANAL BANK; SAID PIPE BEING NORTH 85° 16' 30" WEST 20.04 FEET FROM LAST AFORESAID 3/4" GALVANIZED IRON PIPE ON SAID CANAL BANK; THENCE CONTINUE SOUTH 01° 52' 30" WEST FOR 20.00 FEET TO POINT OF BEGINNING.    HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1" = 10' 10'5'0' Page 523 of 590 3.1'·3.2'·3.1'·3.1'·3.2'·3. 3 '·3. 5 '·3.8'·3.2'·2.5'·1.6'·0.5'·0.3'·0.7'·0.4'·0.0'·0.9'·1.6'·2.1'·2.8'·3.4'·3.4'·3. 3 '·3.3'·3.2'·3.1'·3.1'·2.9'·2.8'·2.6'·2.7'·2.0'·2.4'·2.8'·2.7'·2.9'·3.0'·3.2'·3. 1 '·3.3'·3.2'·3.3'·3.3'·3.3'·3.4'·3. 3 '·3.5'·3.1'·3.1'·2.5'·2.5'·1.8'·1.9'·1.3'·1.4'·0.6'·0.7'·0.1'·0.5'·   HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1" = 20' 20'10'0'TERRAQUATIC, INCPREPARED BY:DRAWN BY: BLSCALE: 1" = 20' CHECKED BY: JRLSHEET 2 OF 2REV:AQUA MARINECONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FOR / SITE ADDRESSDATE: 7/29/24DRAWING: 203 GOODLAND DR PERMIT.dwgJOB No.: 24-1836DETAIL (N.T.S.) HYDROGRAPHIC DATA ARE RELATIVE TO MEAN LOW WATER. DATUMS PROVIDED BY THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION LOCAL VERTICAL DATUM DIAGRAM NAVD-88 MLW -1.88' MHW +0.67' Page 524 of 590 Revised 5/18/2018 Provide to Agents G:\CDES Planning Services\Current\Zoning Staff Information\Job Aides or Help Guides HEARING PACKAGE CHECKLIST A. Backup provided by the County Planner The agent is responsible for all required data included in the digital file of information for the Hearing Examiner (Hex) or the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC). DO NOT ACCEPT DUPLICATES OF ANY DOCUMENTS. MAKE SURE ONLY THE LATEST, ACCEPTED/APPROVED COPY OF THE BELOW DOCUMENTATION. PLEASE CONFIRM THE DOCUMENTS ARE IN THE ORDER DESCRIBED IN “BACKUP PROVIDED BY APPLICANT.” Planner responsible for providing the County Attorney-drafted Ordinance for PUDs and placing in backup materials. AGENTS DO NOT INCLUDE THE PUD DOCUMENT – STAFF PROVIDES THIS TO THE COUNTY ATTORNEY WHEN THE ORDINANCE IS DRAFTED FOR A PUD. THE FINAL PUD ORDINANCE/RESOLUTION IS THE FIRST ITEM AFTER THE STAFF REPORT. [FOR HEX, THE REQUESTED LANGUAGE/ PROPOSED PLAN IS THE FIRST ITEM AFTER THE STAFF REPORT] B. Backup provided by Applicant: PLEASE PROVIDE THE DOCUMENTS IN THE ORDER DESCRIBED BELOW. DO NOT PROVIDE DUPLICATES OF ANY DOCUMENTS. PROVIDE ONLY THE LATEST, ACCEPTED/APPROVED COPY OF THE BELOW DOCUMENTATION. IF THE BACKUP PROVIDED BY APPLICANT IS IN DISARRAY-MEANING IT IS NOT IN THE PROPER ORDER AND/OR THE APPLICANT PROVIDES MULTIPLE DUPLICATES-THE APPLICANT COULD LOSE ITS HEARING DATE. _X__ Application, to include but not limited to the following: _ X__ Narrative of request _ X__ Property Information _ X__ Property Ownership Disclosure Form _ X__ Any other documents required by the specific petition type; such as a variance, a boat dock extension; PUD amendment, rezone request, etc. _ X__ Disclosure of Property Ownership Interest (if there is additional documentation aside from disclosure form) ____ Affidavit of Unified Control _ X__ Affidavit of Representation Authorization _ X__ Drawings (may include Cross-Section (for BDEs generally), proposed Boat Dock(s) with Water depth, location maps etc.) _ ___ NIM Information (Sign in sheet, notes, minutes and transcript/or summary)  Include 3 thumbnail drives of video and/or audio Agent Letter Pkg. ____ Traffic Impact Study (TIS) ____ Environmental Data ____ Historical/Archeological Survey or Waiver ____ Utility Letter _ X__ Deviation Justifications Page 525 of 590 Revised 5/18/2018 Provide to Agents G:\CDES Planning Services\Current\Zoning Staff Information\Job Aides or Help Guides _ X__ Boundary Survey _ X__ Other documents, as needed, on a case-by-case basis such as relevant prior Ordinances, Conditional Uses, historical documents, any “private or legal” agreements affecting the PUD etc. _ X_ Submerged Resource Surveys may be included here if required. _ X __ flash drive with only one pdf file for all documents OR e-mailed .pdf file I understand that by submitting the above materials, it is the agent’s/applicant’s responsibility to ensure all materials are in the same order for flash drive must contain the documents in one pdf file. It is the agent’s responsibility to ensure no documentation is left out. ________________________________________ ____________________ Signature of Agent Representative Date ________________________________________ Printed Name of Signing Agent Representative Nick Pearson 11-21-2024 Page 526 of 590 Application Form Page 527 of 590 THIS PETITION IS FOR (check one): DOCK EXTENSION BOATHOUSE APPLICANT INFORMATION PROPERTY LOCATION Section/Township/Range: / / Subdivision: Property I.D. Number: Lot: Block: Address/ General Location of Subject Property: Current Zoning and Land use of Subject Property: Boat Dock Facility Extension OR Boathouse Establishment Petition Land Development Code Section 5.03.06 Chapter 3 B of the Administrative Code State: Name of Property Owner(s): Name of Applicant if different than owner: Address: Telephone: E-Mail Address: Name of Agent: Firm: Address: Telephone: E-Mail Address: City:City: State:State: ZIP:ZIP: Cell:Cell: City:City: ZIP:ZIP: Cell:Cell: Unit: Page 528 of 590 BE AWARE THAT COLLIER COUNTY HAS LOBBYIST REGULATIONS. GUIDE YOURSELF ACCORDINGLY AND ENSURE THAT YOU ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THESE REGULATIONS. ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE Zoning Land Use N S E W DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Narrative description of project (indicate extent of work, new dock, replacement, addition to existing facility, any other pertinent information): SITE INFORMATION ft. Measurement from: plat survey ft. other (specify) Provided: ft. Required: ft. ft. 1.ft. 2.ft. 4.Total Protrusion of Proposed Facility into Water: visual estimate 6.If applicable, the distance between dock facilities per the Land Development Code section 5.03.06 H.1.d. ft. 7.List any additional dock facilities in close proximity to the subject property and indicate the total protrusion into the waterway of each: 5.Number and Lengths of Vessels to Use Facitlity: 1.Water Width: 2.Total Property Water Frontage: 3.Setbacks: Page 529 of 590 To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? Yes No (If yes, please provide copies.) DOCK EXTENSION PRIMARY CRITERIA The following criteria, pursuant to LDC section 5.03.06, shall be used as a guide by staff in determining its recommendation to the Office of the Hearing Examiner. The Hearing Examiner will utilize the following criteria as a guide in the decision to approve or deny a particular Dock Extension request. In order for the Hearing Examiner to approve the request, it must be determined that at least 4 of the 5 primary criteria, and at least 4 of the 6 secondary criteria, must be met. On separate sheets, please provide a narrative response to the listed criteria and/or questions. 1.Whether or not the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate in relation to the waterfront length, location, upland land use, and zoning of the subject property; consideration should be made of property on unbridged barrier islands, where vessels are the primary means of transportation to and from the property. (The number should be appropriate; typical, single-family use should be no more than two slips; typical multi-family use should be one slip per dwelling unit; in the case of unbridged barrier island docks, additional slips may be appropriate.) 2.Whether or not the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the general length, type, and draft as that described in the petitioner’s application is unable to launch or moor at mean low tide (MLT). (The petitioner’s application and survey should show that the water depth is too shallow to allow launch and mooring of the vessel(s) described without an extension.) 3.Whether or not the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation within an adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. (The facility should not intrude into any marked or charted navigable channel thus impeding vessel traffic in the channel.) 4.Whether or not the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25% of the width of the waterway, and whether or not a minimum of 50% of the waterway width between dock facilities on either side of the waterway is maintained for navigability. (The facility should maintain the required percentages.) 5.Whether or not the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the facility would not interfere with the use of neighboring docks. (The facility should not interfere with the use of legally permitted neighboring docks.) 9. Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: 8. Signs are required to be posted for all petitions. On properties that are one (1) acre or larger in size, the applicant shall be responsible for erecting the required sign. What is the size of the petitioned property? Acres Page 530 of 590 BOATHOUSE CRITERIA The following criteria, pursuant to LDC section 5.03.06 F, shall be used as a guide by staff in determining its recommendation to the decision maker. The decision maker will utilize the following criteria as a guide in the decision to approve or deny a particular Boathouse request. In order for the request to be approved, all of the criteria must be met. On separate sheets, please provide a narrative response to the listed criteria and/or questions. DOCK EXTENSION SECONDARY CRITERIA 1.Whether or not there are special conditions, not involving water depth, related to the subject property or waterway, which justify the proposed dimensions and location of the proposed dock facility. (There must be at least one special condition related to the property; these may include type of shoreline reinforcement, shoreline configuration, mangrove growth, or seagrass beds.) 2.Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe, access to the vessel for loading/ unloading and routine maintenance, without the use of excessive deck area not directly related to these functions. (The facility should not use excessive deck area.) 3.For single-family dock facilities, whether or not the length of the vessel, or vessels in combination, described by the petitioner exceeds 50 percent of the subject property’s linear waterfront footage.(The applicable maximum percentage should be maintained.) 4.Whether or not the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view of neighboring waterfront property owners. (The facility should not have a major impact on the view of either property owner.) 5.Whether or not seagrass beds are located within 200 feet of the proposed dock facility. (If seagrass beds are present, compliance with LDC subsection 5.03.06 J must be demonstrated.) 6.Whether or not the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of LDC subsection 5.03.06 E.11. (If applicable, compliance with subsection 5.03.06.E.11 must be demonstrated.) 1.Minimum side setback requirement: Fifteen feet. 2.Maximum protrusion into waterway: Twenty-five percent of canal width or 20 feet, whichever is less. The roof alone may overhang no more than 3 feet into the waterway beyond the maximum protrusion and/or side setbacks. 3.Maximum height; Fifteen feet as measured from the top of the seawall or bank, whichever is more restrictive, to the peak or highest elevation of the roof. 4.Maximum number of boathouses and covered structures per site: One. 5.All boathouses and covered structures shall be completely open on all 4 sides. 6.Roofing material and roof color shall be the same as materials and colors used on principal structure or may be a palm frond “chickee” style. A single-family dwelling unit must ve constructed on the subject lot prior to, or simultaneously with, the construction of any boathouse or covered dock structure. 7.The boathouse or covered structure must be so located as to minimize the impact on the view of the adjacent neighbors to the gratest extent practical. Page 531 of 590 ASSOCIATIONS Complete the following for all registered Home Owner / Civic Association(s) that could be affected by this petition and located within 1,000 feet of the subject property. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Civic Associations and Communities page on the Board of County Commissioner’s website. Applicant is responsible for and shall confirm the current mailing addresses for each association as registered by the Florida Department of State, Division of Corporations. City: State: ZIP: City: State: ZIP: City: State: ZIP: City:State: ZIP: Name of Homeowner / Civic Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner / Civic Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner / Civic Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner / Civic Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner / Civic Association: Mailing Address: City:State: ZIP: Page 532 of 590 Pre-Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: Dock Extension Boathouse Chapter 3 B. of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement Checklist is to be utilized during the Pre-Application Meeting, and at time of application submittal. At time of submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted or processed. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Completed Application (download current form from County website) Property Ownership Disclosure Form Signed and sealed survey Chart of site waterway Site plan illustration with the following: •Lot dimensions; •Required setbacks for the dock facility; •Cross section showing relation to MHW/MLW and shoreline (bank, seawall, or rip-rap revetment); •Configuration, location, and dimensions of existing and proposed facility; •Water depth where proposed dock facility is to be located; •Distance of navigable channel; •Illustration of the contour of the property; and •Illustration of dock facility from both an aerial and side view. Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized Completed Addressing Checklist ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: •Following the completion of the review process by County review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. •Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. Page 533 of 590 PLANNERS – INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment: Executive Director Historical Review: Addressing: Parks and Recreation: City of Naples Planning Director School District (Residential Components): Conservancy of SWFL: Other: Emergency Management: Other: FEE REQUIREMENTS: Boat Dock Extension / Boathouse Petition fee: $1,500.00 Pre-Application Meeting fee $500.00 Estimated Legal Advertising fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner: $1,125.00 If applicable, an additional fee for Property Owner Notifications will be billed to the applicant after Hearing Examiner hearing date. (Variable) Fire Planning Review fee: $100.00 *The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Community Development Department | GMD Portal: https://cvportal.colliercountyfl.gov/cityviewweb Questions? Email: GMDclientservices@colliercountyfl.gov Signature of Petitioner or Agent Date All fees are collected at the time of application. Property Notification Letters, if required by The Land Development Code, will be invoiced after the petition is heard by the Board of County Commissioners. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. *Additional fee for the 5th and subsequent re-submittal will be accessed at 20% of the original fee. Printed Name Page 534 of 590 Narrative Statement Page 535 of 590 BAYSHORE MARINE CONSULTING, LLC www.Bayshore-Marine.com ● NICK@BAYSHOREMARINECONSULTING.COM ● 239-404-7982 Page 1 of 2 203 Goodand Dr. E - BDE Petition #PL20240003998 Narrative Description of Project Narrative description of project: (indicate extent of work, new dock, replacement, addition to existing facility, any other pertinent information): The property at 203 Goodland Dr E, owned by Joesph Noble through his corporation: Noble & Noble Investments LLC since December 23rd of 2023, is an unconventional property comprised of 2 separate parcels. The larger of the 2 parcels is land-locked on the south side of Goodland Dr. and contains a single-family residence. The smaller parcel is an approximately 20’ by 41’-45’ waterfront lot. The larger parcel is platted as part of the Petit subdivision of Goodland and the smaller parcel is apparently not platted. The rip rap shoreline on site was constructed landward of the property boundary, and so the depth of land within the parcel fluctuates from only 17.5’ to 19’. The rip rap shoreline matches the lot width at 20 linear feet. The lot is zoned RSF-4, which is intended for development with single-family residences. However, because of the lot’s small size, it cannot support a principle structure by itself, and boat docking is effectively the only use for the plot. As such, the lot is currently vacant with exception to the rip rap and existing dock. The subject property’s riparian area was originally dredged from land per the enclosed historic aerial overlay. We propose to construct a single 5’ wide by 30’ long finger pier that would extend from the MHWL (which is the most restrictive point) and provide access to a single boatlift. The boatlift would provide access to a single, 31’ LOA vessel. The max protrusion of the facility would be equal to 33’ with the vessel included. The proposed overwater structure will amount to a total of 150 square feet. This would allow for 13’ of protrusion beyond the normally allowed 20’ of protrusion for this location. This design will also require a side setback variance from both side lot lines. The typical side setbacks required for properties with less than 60’ of water frontage is 7.5’. The existing dock provides a 5’ side setback on the west side, and a 0’ side setback on the east side with boatslip included. The proposed dock would allow for 0’ side setbacks from both riparian lines. The side setbacks proposed per this design will be addressed by a separate, companion variance petition. The waterway width between property boundaries at this location is approximately 68’ in width and the actual waterway width (from MHWL to MHWL) is 100’. The proposed dock would protrude 30’ from the MHWL, and only 7’ beyond the rear property line. The remaining waterway should be sufficient for navigation to occur and so the proposed project should not cause navigational issues. Views should not be majorly affected either considering that the project is actually typical for the area. Per exhibit 07 of 08, Several other docks present larger protrusion amounts, and cover more area of the water. Lastly, there are no seagrasses or other resources growing within the vicinity of the project site. Therefore, there is no reason to believe this project will cause any environmental impacts either. Considering the details above, we believe that this BDE would therefore allow the property owner to make reasonable use of the waterway and docking facility for mooring and other water-based Page 536 of 590 Page 2 of 2 recreational activities while also maintaining the ability to safely ingress and egress with the applicant’s vessels. Page 537 of 590 Property Information Page 538 of 590 Page 539 of 590 Page 540 of 590 Page 541 of 590 Page 542 of 590 Warranty Deed Page 543 of 590 Page 544 of 590 Page 545 of 590 Corporation Information Page 546 of 590 Page 547 of 590 Ownership Disclosure Form Page 548 of 590 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a.If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: Name and Address % of Ownership b.If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address % of Ownership c.If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest: Name and Address % of Ownership Page 549 of 590 d.If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners: Name and Address % of Ownership e.If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners: Name and Address % of Ownership Date of Contract: ___________ f.If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust: Name and Address g.Date subject property acquired _______________ Leased: Term of lease ____________ years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Page 550 of 590 Date of option: _________________________ Date option terminates: __________________, or Anticipated closing date: ________________ AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form. Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest-holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition’s final public hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. ____________________________________________ ____________ Agent/Owner Signature Date ____________________________________________ Agent/Owner Name (please print) *The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Community Development Department | GMD Portal: https://cvportal.colliercountyfl.gov/cityviewweb Questions? Email: GMDclientservices@colliercountyfl.gov Page 551 of 590 Affidavit of Authorization Page 552 of 590 PL20240003998 and PL20240007332 Page 553 of 590 Petition Exhibits Page 554 of 590 NOTES:THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTINGPURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDEDFOR CONSTRUCTION USE.LATITUDE:N 25.9263092LONGITUDE:W -81.6448954SITE ADDRESS:203 GOODLAND DR. EGOODLAND, FL 34140CREATED:JOB NO.:DESIGNED:C:\Bayshore Marine Consulting\2411 - Aquamarine-Noble, 203 Goodland Dr. E\CAD\CC\Collier BDE set 8-1-2024.dwg LOCATION MAP 8/1/2024SHEET NO.:01 OF 08LOCATION MAPNOBLE DOCK241106-11-24N.S.P.COLLIER COUNTYSUBJECT PROPERTYSTATE OF FLORIDANESWPID #:66680320005SECTION:18TOWNSHIP:52 SCOUNTY:COLLIERRANGE:27 EGOODLANDMARCO ISLANDPage 555 of 590 0.5'3.2'3.3'1.3'0.1'3.1'3.2'3.2'0.3'·0.4'2.1'3.3'3.1'2.6'2.7'3.3'2.5'SURVEYEDPROPERTYBOUNDARYEXISTING FIXED DOCKSCALE IN FEET8040200CREATED:JOB NO.:DESIGNED:C:\Bayshore Marine Consulting\2411 - Aquamarine-Noble, 203 Goodland Dr. E\CAD\CC\Collier BDE set 8-1-2024.dwg EXISTING CONDITIONS 8/1/2024SHEET NO.:NESWN.S.P.06-11-24241102 OF 08NOBLE DOCKEXISTING CONDITIONS·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPRX. LF):·EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPRX. SF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPRX. LF):NOTES:·EXISTING PROTRUSION FROM MHWL:2076100'20'SITE ADDRESS:203 E. GOODLAND DR.34140,GOODLANDFLGOODLAND DR. EPETIT DR.RIPARIAN LINERIPARIANLINEAPPROXIMATE PROPERTYBOUNDARIES PER THEPROPERTY APPRAISER41' 45'20'20'MHWLEXISTING RIP RAPEXISTINGNEIGHBORINGDOCKS20'100'55'100'55'4'DEPTHS AT MLW19.2' 17.5'Page 556 of 590 C:\Bayshore Marine Consulting\2411 - Aquamarine-Noble, 203 Goodland Dr. E\CAD\CC\Collier BDE set 8-1-2024.dwg 8/1/2024AA04SURVEYEDPROPERTYBOUNDARYSCALE IN FEET201050CREATED:JOB NO.:DESIGNED:C:\Bayshore Marine Consulting\2411 - Aquamarine-Noble, 203 Goodland Dr. E\CAD\CC\Collier BDE set 8-1-2024.dwg PROPOSED DOCK 8/1/2024SHEET NO.:NESWPROPOSED PROJECTNOBLE DOCK03 OF 08241106-11-24N.S.P.PROPOSED DOCKAND BOATLIFTSRIPARIAN LINEESTIMATEDRIPARIAN LINE·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPRX. LF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPRX):NOTES:·PROPOSED OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPRX SF):·TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM MHWL:30150100205'12.5'7'EXISTINGNEIGHBORINGDOCKEXISTINGNEIGHBORINGDOCKSMHWLAPPROXIMATEPROPERTY BOUNDARYPER THE PROPERTYAPPRAISER0.5' SIDESETBACK0.5' SIDESETBACK33' MAX. PROTRUSION FROM MHWL 30' 31'20'EXISTINGRIP RAPPage 557 of 590 3.3'3.3' 3. 1 ' 2. 5 ' 1. 8 ' 1. 3 ' 0. 6 ' 0. 1 'PROPOSEDDOCKMHWL +0.67' NAVDMLWL -1.88' NAVDSTRINGERCAPTIMBEREXISTINGRIP RAPSCALE IN FEET1052.50CREATED:JOB NO.:DESIGNED:C:\Bayshore Marine Consulting\2411 - Aquamarine-Noble, 203 Goodland Dr. E\CAD\CC\Collier BDE set 8-1-2024.dwg CROSS SECTION AA 8/1/2024SHEET NO.:CROSS SECTION AANOBLE DOCK04 OF 08241106-11-24N.S.P.DOCK PILEDECKING33' PROTRUSIONFROM MHWLBOAT LIFTWATER DEPTHSAT MLW31'2.2'20'PROTRUSIONCONTOUR13'Page 558 of 590 SCALE IN FEET10420CREATED:JOB NO.:DESIGNED:C:\Bayshore Marine Consulting\2411 - Aquamarine-Noble, 203 Goodland Dr. E\CAD\CC\Collier BDE set 8-1-2024.dwg CROSS SECTION BB 8/1/2024SHEET NO.:CROSS SECTION BBNOBLE DOCK05 OF 08241106-11-24N.S.P.20'5'12.5'STRINGERCAPTIMBERDOCK PILEDECKINGBOAT LIFTPROPERTYBOUNDARYPROPERTYBOUNDARY3.3' AT MLW.5' PROVIDED SETBACK.5' PROVIDED SETBACKMHWL +0.67' NAVDMLWL -1.88' NAVDPage 559 of 590 C:\Bayshore Marine Consulting\2411 - Aquamarine-Noble, 203 Goodland Dr. E\CAD\CC\Collier BDE set 8-1-2024.dwg 8/1/2024PROPOSED DOCKAND BOATLIFTSTYPICALTRANSECTPROPERTYBOUNDARYSCALE IN FEET10050250CREATED:JOB NO.:DESIGNED:C:\Bayshore Marine Consulting\2411 - Aquamarine-Noble, 203 Goodland Dr. E\CAD\CC\Collier BDE set 8-1-2024.dwg SRS 8/1/2024SHEET NO.:NESWSUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEYNOBLE DOCK06 OF 08241106-11-24N.S.P.10'200'NO SEAGRASSESOBSERVED WITHINSURVEY AREAPage 560 of 590 C:\Bayshore Marine Consulting\2411 - Aquamarine-Noble, 203 Goodland Dr. E\CAD\CC\Collier BDE set 8-1-2024.dwg 8/1/2024DIMENSIONS SHOWN AREAPPROXIMATED BASED OFFTHE AERIAL IMAGE AND ARESUBJECT TO MINOR ERRORSCALE IN FEET200100500CREATED:JOB NO.:DESIGNED:C:\Bayshore Marine Consulting\2411 - Aquamarine-Noble, 203 Goodland Dr. E\CAD\CC\Collier BDE set 8-1-2024.dwg ADJACENT DOCKS 8/1/2024SHEET NO.:NESWADJACENT DOCKSNOBLE DOCK07 OF 08241106-11-24N.S.P.95' 22' 28'74'3 0 ' 24'23'19'26'33'Page 561 of 590 C:\Bayshore Marine Consulting\2411 - Aquamarine-Noble, 203 Goodland Dr. E\CAD\CC\Collier BDE set 8-1-2024.dwg 8/1/2024SCALE IN FEET8040200CREATED:JOB NO.:DESIGNED:C:\Bayshore Marine Consulting\2411 - Aquamarine-Noble, 203 Goodland Dr. E\CAD\CC\Collier BDE set 8-1-2024.dwg WATERWAY 8/1/2024SHEET NO.:NESWWATERWAY WIDTHNOBLE DOCK08 OF 08241106-11-24N.S.P.100' MH W L TO MH W L 68' BE T W E E N APPA R E N T PROP E R T Y L I N E S 48'61'Page 562 of 590 Primary Criteria Page 563 of 590 Page 1 of 2 PRIMARY CRITERIA The following criteria, pursuant to LDC section 5.03.06, shall be used as a guide by staff in determining its recommendation to the Office of the Hearing Examiner. The Hearing Examiner will utilize the following criteria as a guide in the decision to approve or deny a particular Dock Extension request. In order for the Hearing Examiner to approve the request, it must be determined that at least 4 of the 5 primary criteria, and at least 4 of the 6 secondary criteria, must be met. On separate sheets, please provide a narrative response to the listed criteria and/or questions. 1. Whether or not the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate in relation to the waterfront length, location, upland land use, and zoning of the subject property; consideration should be made of property on unbridged barrier islands, where vessels are the primary means of transportation to and from the property. (The number should be appropriate; typical, single-family use should be no more than two slips; typical multi-family use should be one slip per dwelling unit; in the case of unbridged barrier island docks, additional slips may be appropriate.) The subject property is zoned RSF-4 for and is used currently as a single-family residential property which warrants no more than 2 slips per the CC-LDC. The proposed project consists of a single dock with 1 boat lift. This criteria is therefore met. 2. Whether or not the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the general length, type, and draft as that described in the petitioner’s application is unable to launch or moor at mean low tide (MLT). (The petitioner’s application and survey should show that the water depth is too shallow to allow launch and mooring of the vessel (s) described without an extension.) Most boatlifts vary between 10’ and 15’ in length and width on the lift pile centers. If a lift of this general size was installed inside the 20’ protrusion limit per Collier County’s L.D.C., then this lift would be placed in a maximum of approximately 2.2’ of water at low tide per exhibit 04 of 08. This depth of water (at low tide) is not sufficient to allow ingress or egress of the applicant’s vessel from a boatlift, as most vessels of this size require about 1.5’ to 2’ of water above the lift bunks in order to launch. This criteria is therefore met. 3. Whether or not the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation within an adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. (The facility should not intrude into any marked or charted navigable channel thus impeding vessel traffic in the channel.) There is no marked or charted channel at or adjacent to the proposed project location. Therefore, no marked or charted channels will be affected by the proposed project and this criteria is met. 4. Whether or not the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25 percent of the width of the waterway, and whether a minimum of 50 percent of the waterway width between dock facilities on either side of the waterway is maintained for navigability. (The facility should maintain the required percentages.) The width of waterway at this location between property lines is approximately 68’ wide. However, the actual waterway match, and so the MHWL to MHWL measurement is significantly larger, at 100’. The applicant is proposing a dock and vessel that will protrude 33’ into the waterway from the MHWL, which exceeds the 25% criteria. But, only 7’ of protrusion will occur outside of the applicant’s owned property boundary, which does not exceed the 25% criteria. Identifying whether this criteria is met or not is therefore somewhat problematic, because it depends on how the waterway is being measured. And, whichever waterway measurement is utilized, 50% of the waterway will remain for navigation. In the interest of being conservative, this petition will consider this criteria as being not met unless county staff opine otherwise. Page 564 of 590 Page 2 of 2 5. Whether or not the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the facility would not interfere with the use of neighboring docks. (The facility should not interfere with the use of legally permitted neighboring docks.) This dock facility is oriented in the same direction as the neighboring docks along this portion of the waterway, which is in a shore-normal configuration. Neither the proposed side setbacks nor the protrusion being proposed is atypical for the area, and no neighboring docks should be affected by the project as proposed. This criteria is therefore met. Page 565 of 590 Secondary Criteria Page 566 of 590 Page 1 of 2 SECONDARY CRITERIA 1. Whether or not there are special conditions, not involving water depth, related to the subject property or waterway, which justify the proposed dimensions and location of the proposed dock facility. (There must be at least one special condition related to the property; these may include type of shoreline reinforcement, shoreline configuration, mangrove growth, or seagrass beds.) The parcel on which the proposed project is located is an unconventional sized lot that is too small for a principal structure to be located, and is intended essentially exclusively for the use of boat mooring. The lot is also too narrow (especially when considering the standard 7.5’ side setbacks from both riparian lines) to reasonably moor a boat in a shore parallel configuration, which all but requires mooring in a shore-normal configuration. A shore normal configuration within the standard protrusion limit per Collier County’s L.D.C. limits the property owner to mooring boats of 20’ LOA or less, which severely restricts the overall and intended use of the lot. Furthermore, numerous of the adjacent boat slip lots already have docks with similar configurations, protrusions, and provided side setbacks. This criteria is therefore met. 2. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe, access to the vessel for loading/unloading and routine maintenance, without the use of excessive deck area not directly related to these functions. (The facility should not use excessive deck area.) The proposed facility will utilize only a single 5’ wide by 30’ long area of decking which totals 150 total square feet. This square footage is substantially less than many of the surrounding docks and is, in our opinion, not excessive. This criteria is therefore met. 3. For single-family dock facilities, whether or not the length of the vessel, or vessels in combination, described by the petitioner exceeds 50 percent of the subject property’s linear waterfront footage. (The applicable maximum percentage should be maintained.) In order to meet this criteria, the applicant would need to propose mooring of only a single vessel of 10’ LOA or less, which would be in our opinion, excessively restrictive for the site’s intended use. However, the length of the vessel proposed (31’) in this petition nevertheless does still exceed 50% of the property’s 20’ of shoreline. This criteria is therefore not met. 4. Whether or not the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view of neighboring waterfront property owners. (The facility should not have a major impact on the view of either property owner.) The proposed dock configuration is the same as the existing structure, only 10’ longer (13’ with vessel included). This design will remain in line with the neighboring docking facilities. Additionally, the use of the facility for private, recreational purposes will be consistent with the surrounding area as well. Therefore, the proposed project should not constitute a major impact to views of the neighbors. This criteria is therefore met. 5. Whether or not seagrass beds are located within 200 feet of the proposed dock facility. (If seagrass beds are present, compliance with LDC subsection 5.03.06 J must be demonstrated.) There are no seagrass beds present within a 200’ area surrounding the subject property and so no impacts to seagrasses are expected as a result of the proposed project. This criteria is therefore met. 6. Whether or not the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of LDC subsection 5.03.06 E.11. (If applicable, compliance with subsection 5.03.06.E.11 must be demonstrated.) Section 5.03.06 of Collier County’s Land Development Code (LDC) stipulates that “multi-slip docking facilities with 10 or more slips will be reviewed for consistency with the Manatee Protection plan (MPP)”. Page 567 of 590 Page 2 of 2 The proposed project is for a private, recreational 1-slip dock associated with a single-family zoned lot in Goodland. The proposed facility does not have more than 10 slips and so is not subject to review for consistency with Collier County’s MPP. This criteria is therefore not applicable per county staff’s usual interpretation of the LDC. Page 568 of 590 Boundary Survey Page 569 of 590 PETTIT DRIVE FND 1 2" IR, NO IDS88°07'30"E 246.00'RADIAL LINESET 5 8" IRC ,LB7324 WITNESS CORNER SET 5 8" IRC, LB7324 MHWL LOCATED 4/3/24 EL: 0.67' NAVD 88 POINT OF COMMENCEMENT NW'LY CORNER OF PETTIT SUB. FND 5/8" IR, NO ID 10.00'10.00'9.00'10.00'S88°07'30"E 20.00'N01°52'30"E 21.81'N76°33' 5 0 " W 18.17' ( D ) 1 8 . 5 8 ' ( C )S01°52'30"W 24.89'N01°52'30"E 19.00'S01°52'30"W 20.00'L: 1.83' R: 130.00' Δ: 0°48'21"N12°37'49"EDOCK PARCEL BOUNDARY LINE (TYP) LEGEND: (C) CALCULATED CCR COLLIER COUNTY RECORDS C/L CENTER LINE (D) DEED FND FOUND IR(C) IRON ROD (& CAP) LB LICENSED BUSINESS MHW(L) MEAN HIGH WATER (LINE) MLW(L) MEAN LOW WATER (LINE) NAVD 88 NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 ORB OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK PG PAGE PSM PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER TYP TYPICAL SPECIFIC PURPOSE SURVEY SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 52 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AQUA MARINECONSTRUCTIONTERRAQUATIC, INCPREPARED FOR / SITE ADDRESSPREPARED BY:DATE: 7/29/24DRAWING: 203 GOODLAND DR PERMIT.dwgDRAWN BY: BLSCALE: 1" = 10'JOB No.: 24-1836CHECKED BY: JRLSHEET 1 OF 2REV: 7/29/24 UPDATED NOTES PER CNTY CMNTS.CERTIFICATION: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ATTACHED SPECIFIC PURPOSE SURVEY IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF AS SURVEYED UNDER MY DIRECTION ON 4/3/24. I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT THIS SPECIFIC PURPOSE SURVEY MEETS THE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE AS SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 5J-17 ADOPTED BY THE FLORIDA BOARD OF SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS PURSUANT TO FLORIDA STATUTE 472.027.JOSHUA LEE, PSM - FLORIDA REGISTRATION NUMBER 7322 VICINITY MAPS NOT TO SCALE PROJECTLOCATION SURVEY SITE SURVEY NOTES: 1. THIS IS A SPECIFIC PURPOSE SURVEY AS DEFINED IN THE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE FOR SURVEYING AND MAPPING IN CHAPTER 5J-17 FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. 2. THIS SURVEY IS CERTIFIED TO AQUA MARINE CONSTRUCTION, BAYSHORE MARINE CONSULTING AND NOBLE & NOBLE INVESTMENTS, LLC. 3. THIS SURVEY IS INTENDED EXCLUSIVELY FOR THE USE BY THOSE TO WHOM IT IS CERTIFIED. IT IS NOT TO BE USED BY OTHERS FOR CONSTRUCTION, PERMITTING, DESIGN OR ANY OTHER USE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF TERRAQUATIC, INC. 4. THIS SURVEY, AND ANY REPRODUCTION THEREOF, IS NOT VALID WITHOUT AN ORIGINAL OR VERIFIED DIGITAL SIGNATURE AND SEAL OF A FLORIDA REGISTERED SURVEYOR. ADDITIONALLY, THIS SURVEY IS NOT VALID IF PRINTED BEARING A DIGITAL SIGNATURE AND SEAL. 5. OTHER THAN THOSE SHOWN ON THE REFERENCED PLAT, NO SEARCH OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS WAS PERFORMED FOR EASEMENTS, ENCUMBRANCES OR OTHER INSTRUMENTS OF RECORD WHICH MAY AFFECT THIS PARCEL OF LAND. 6. THIS MAP IS INTENDED TO BE DISPLAYED AT A SCALE OF 1 INCH = 20 FEET OR SMALLER. 7. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WERE NOT LOCATED AS PART OF THIS SURVEY. 8. BEARING AND DISTANCES SHOWN HERON ARE RELATIVE TO THE NORTH AMERICA DATUM OF 1983, 1990 ADJUSTMENT (NAD 83/90), FLORIDA STATE PLANE, EAST ZONE (0901), TRANSVERSE MERCATOR PROJECTION IN THE U.S. SURVEY FOOT UNIT OF MEASUREMENT. 9. BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE RELATIVE TO A GRID BEARING OF S88°07'30"E ALONG THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF PETTIT SUBDIVISION PER OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 321, PAGE 2572 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY PUBLIC RECORDS. 10. LOCATIONS WERE OBTAINED USING REAL TIME KINEMATIC GPS METHODOLOGIES WITH BROADCAST CORRECTIONS FROM THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION REFERENCE NETWORK AND ARE ACCURATE TO THIRD ORDER, CLASS II. 11. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, FIELD BEARINGS AND DISTANCES ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE RECORD DEED. 12. THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE OF THIS SURVEY IS TO PROVIDE THE NECESSARY INFORMATION FOR A DOCK PERMIT. 13. THE BOUNDARY INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON IS LIMITED TO THE "AND" PARCEL LYING IN GOVERNMENT LOT 14 AS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 6321 AT PAGE 2572, OF THE COLLIER COUNTY PUBLIC RECORDS, AND HEREIN REFERRED TO AS THE "DOCK PARCEL". AS SUCH, LOT 13, AS DESCRIBED IN SAID DEED, IS NOT PART OF THIS SURVEY. LEGAL DESCRIPTION (RECORD DEED, O.R.B. 6321, PG. 2572, C.C.R.) LOT 13, OF PETTIT SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 2, PAGE 88, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND A PARCEL LYING IN GOVERNMENT LOT 14, SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 52 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, TALLAHASSEE MERIDIAN, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS: COMMENCING AT A 4" X 4" CONCRETE MONUMENT WITH A 3/4" GALVANIZED IRON PIPE MARKING THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF PETTIT SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 2, PAGE 88, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROCEED SOUTH 88° 07' 30" EAST FOLLOWING THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID PETTIT SUBDIVISION FOR 246.00 FEET TO A 3/4" GALVANIZED IRON PIPE,THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE SOUTH 88° 07' 30" EAST FOLLOWING SAID BOUNDARY 20.00 FEET TO A 3/4" GALVANIZED IRON PIPE; THENCE RUN NORTH 1° 52' 30" EAST FOR 19.00 FEET TO A 3/4" GALVANIZED IRON PIPE ON THE BANK OF A CANAL FROM GOODLAND BAY; THENCE CONTINUE NORTH 1° 52' 30" EAST FOR 21.81 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID CANAL; THENCE PROCEED WESTERLY FOLLOWING THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID CANAL ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 130.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00° 48' 21" FOR A DISTANCE OF 1.83 FEET TO POINT OF TANGENCY, THE TANGENT AT LAST AFORESAID POINT OF BEARING NORTH 77° 22' 11" WEST; THENCE CONTINUE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY CANAL BOUNDARY NORTH 76° 33' 50" WEST FOR 18.17 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE RUN SOUTH 01° 52' 30" WEST FOR 24.89 FEET TO A 3/4" GALVANIZED IRON PIPE ON SAID CANAL BANK; SAID PIPE BEING NORTH 85° 16' 30" WEST 20.04 FEET FROM LAST AFORESAID 3/4" GALVANIZED IRON PIPE ON SAID CANAL BANK; THENCE CONTINUE SOUTH 01° 52' 30" WEST FOR 20.00 FEET TO POINT OF BEGINNING.    HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1" = 10' 10'5'0' Page 570 of 590 3.1'·3.2'·3.1'·3.1'·3.2'·3. 3 '·3. 5 '·3.8'·3.2'·2.5'·1.6'·0.5'·0.3'·0.7'·0.4'·0.0'·0.9'·1.6'·2.1'·2.8'·3.4'·3.4'·3. 3 '·3.3'·3.2'·3.1'·3.1'·2.9'·2.8'·2.6'·2.7'·2.0'·2.4'·2.8'·2.7'·2.9'·3.0'·3.2'·3. 1 '·3.3'·3.2'·3.3'·3.3'·3.3'·3.4'·3. 3 '·3.5'·3.1'·3.1'·2.5'·2.5'·1.8'·1.9'·1.3'·1.4'·0.6'·0.7'·0.1'·0.5'·   HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1" = 20' 20'10'0'TERRAQUATIC, INCPREPARED BY:DRAWN BY: BLSCALE: 1" = 20' CHECKED BY: JRLSHEET 2 OF 2REV:AQUA MARINECONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FOR / SITE ADDRESSDATE: 7/29/24DRAWING: 203 GOODLAND DR PERMIT.dwgJOB No.: 24-1836DETAIL (N.T.S.) HYDROGRAPHIC DATA ARE RELATIVE TO MEAN LOW WATER. DATUMS PROVIDED BY THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION LOCAL VERTICAL DATUM DIAGRAM NAVD-88 MLW -1.88' MHW +0.67' Page 571 of 590 Submerged Resource Survey Page 572 of 590 SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY REPORT JUNE 2024 203 GOODLAND DR. E. NAPLES, FL 34140 FOLIO #66680320005 Page 573 of 590 203 Goodland Dr. E Submerged Resource Survey June 2024 1 1 INTRODUCTION Bayshore Marine Consulting, LLC (BMC) has been contracted to provide environmental services in the form of a Submerged Resource Survey (SRS) at 203 Goodland Dr. E in Goodland, FL 34140. The site is located within Section 18, Township 52 S, and Range 27 E of Collier County and can be identified by folio #66680320005. This resource survey will provide planning assistance to both the property owner and regulating agencies during any project review process. The subject property consists of 2 separate but adjacent parcels that together comprise approximately 0.13 acres of area near the north side of Goodland. The larger parcel is landlocked and contains a single-family residence. The smaller parcel abuts a man-made canal and is vacant besides a 4’ by 20’ long dock that connects against 20’ of rip rap shoreline. The subject properties are neighbored to the south, east, and west by single-family residences, and to the north by a canal. The SRS was conducted on June 17th, 2024, between approximately 3:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. Site conditions consisted of overcast skies with moderate winds. Water clarity was poor, allowing for submerged visibility of approximately 1 to 2 feet. The ambient air temperature was approximately 85 degrees Fahrenheit and wind speeds averaged 15 - 20 mph from the west. The average ambient water temperature was approximately 80 degrees Fahrenheit. High tide occurred prior to the site visit at approximately 10:09 a.m. and reached approximately 2.6 feet above the Mean Low-Water Line. Low tide was achieved following the site visit at approximately 5:22 p.m. reaching approximately 0.3 feet above the Mean Low Water Line. 2 OBJECTIVE The objective of the SRS was to identify and locate any existing submerged resources within or around the riparian area of the subject property. Ordinarily, if seagrasses are present within the vicinity of a proposed project area, an analysis will be required regarding species, percent coverage, and impacts projected by the project. The presence of seagrasses may be cause for re-configuration of the project design so as to minimize impacts. The scope of work performed during a typical submerged resource survey is summarized below: • BMC personnel will conduct a site visit, follow a series of transects within the designated survey area, and observe the underlying submerged lands so as to verify the location of any submerged resources that may be present. • BMC personnel will identify submerged resources within the vicinity of the project site and delineate the approximate boundary limit of the resources. • BMC personnel will produce an estimate of the percent coverage of any resources found. 3 METHODOLOGY Page 574 of 590 203 Goodland Dr. E Submerged Resource Survey June 2024 2 BMC has designed the methodology of the SRS to cover the entire property’s shoreline and riparian area. The components utilized for this survey included: • Reviewing aerial photography of the surveyed area. • Establishing survey transect lines (spaced approximately 10 feet apart) overlaid onto aerials. (See attached Exhibits) • Physically walking, swimming, or otherwise following the transects so as to observe, locate and record the limits and percent coverage of any submerged resources found. • Documenting all findings into this report The surveyed area was evaluated by following the established transect lines throughout the project site as shown on the attached exhibit. Neighboring properties, docking facilities, and other landmarks provided reference markers which assisted in maintaining correct positioning over each transect. 4 RESULTS The substrate found within the surveyed area consists of silty muck material. Depths increased gradually with distance from the shoreline from approximately 3 to 5 feet. During the submerged portion of the survey, no seagrasses, shellfish, or other resources were observed in any capacity on the benthic surface with exception to some mangroves along the shoreline. Oyster debris could be seen on some of the dock piles and rip rap within the survey area. Accordingly, no impacts to submerged resources on the benthic surface are expected to occur as the result of a dock project at the subject property. A list of species observed during the SRS can be seen below in Table 1. Table 1: Observed species of wildlife and vegetation within the vicinity of the project site Common Name Scientific Name Eastern oyster Crassostrea virginica Common barnacle Balanus sp. Striped mullet Mugil cephalus 5 CONCLUSION The submerged resource survey was conducted and completed throughout the riparian area of the subject property and yielded no results besides mangroves on adjacent parcels and oysters on dock piles. No seagrasses or other resources were observed on the benthic surface within the vicinity of the survey area. Accordingly, negative impacts to submerged resources are not expected as the result of a dock project at this location. Page 575 of 590 203 Goodland Dr. E Submerged Resource Survey June 2024 3 6 PHOTOS Photo 1: Shoreline and dock facilities within the survey area. Photo 2: View of shoreline at subject property Page 576 of 590 NOTES:THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTINGPURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDEDFOR CONSTRUCTION USE.LATITUDE:N 25.9263088LONGITUDE:W -81.6448998SITE ADDRESS:203 GOODLAND DR. EGOODLAND, FL 34140CREATED:JOB NO.:DESIGNED:C:\Bayshore Marine Consulting\2411 - Aquamarine-Noble, 203 Goodland Dr. E\CAD\SRS\SRS-Set.dwg LOCATION MAP 6/16/2024SHEET NO.:01 OF 03LOCATION MAPSUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY241106-16-24N.S.P.COLLIER COUNTYSUBJECT PROPERTYSTATE OF FLORIDANESWPID #:66680320005SECTION:18TOWNSHIP:52 SCOUNTY:COLLIERRANGE:27 EGOODLANDPage 577 of 590 GOODLAND DR. ERIPARIAN LINERIPARIAN LINEPROPERTYBOUNDARYEXISTINGDOCKSCALE IN FEET8040200CREATED:JOB NO.:DESIGNED:C:\Bayshore Marine Consulting\2411 - Aquamarine-Noble, 203 Goodland Dr. E\CAD\SRS\SRS-Set.dwg EXISTING CONDITIONS 6/16/2024SHEET NO.:NESWN.S.P.06-16-24241102 OF 03SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEYEXISTING CONDITIONS20'41' 45'20'SITE ADDRESS:,34140FLGOODLAND203 E. GOODLAND DR.55'100'100'55'PETIT DR.PLATTEDWATERWAYBOUNDARYPage 578 of 590 C:\Bayshore Marine Consulting\2411 - Aquamarine-Noble, 203 Goodland Dr. E\CAD\SRS\SRS-Set.dwg 6/16/2024PROPERTYBOUNDARYSCALE IN FEET10050250CREATED:JOB NO.:DESIGNED:C:\Bayshore Marine Consulting\2411 - Aquamarine-Noble, 203 Goodland Dr. E\CAD\SRS\SRS-Set.dwg RESOURCE MAP 6/16/2024SHEET NO.:NESWRESOURCE MAPSUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY03 OF 03241106-16-24N.S.P.200'10'TYPICALTRANSECTNO SEAGRASSESOBSERVED WITHINSURVEY AREAPage 579 of 590 Historical Aerial Imagery Page 580 of 590 Page 581 of 590 Page 582 of 590 1 John Kelly From:Sean Sammon Sent:Tuesday, November 26, 2024 10:24 AM To:John Kelly Subject:FW: 203 Goodland Dr Attachments:20241126_091432.jpg; 20241126_091421.jpg; 20241126_091412.jpg John, Here’s your 203 goodland pics, you may want to crop my finger out of the close up photo. This property is so rocky, I found a spot that the sign could go halfway in, hope it holds. Sean Sammon Planner III Zoning Office:239-252-8422 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Sean.Sammon@colliercountyfl.gov From: Sean Sammon <ssback39@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2024 10:19 AM To: Sean Sammon <Sean.Sammon@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: 203 Goodland Dr EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Attached Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Page 583 of 590 Page 584 of 590 Page 585 of 590 Halt The Proposed lil-Foot Dock Extension Threatening Our Canal Access ,r'r*tf The Issue Our comer of paradise, houskrg 63 trailers and 1 I homes, sustains a unique harmony wtth nature and a{cessibltty to the Gulf of Mo&o- Our daily exp€riefl€es and lirrlihoods are laced with the ebb and flow of the canal ttrat constitrtes our communityS lifelin€- A proposed l3-foot dod stension thrcirt€rE $is bahme, hindering not just nryseff, but all in our "neighborhood of vyater' ftom nat lgable access through our canal. Our environment is notjust an asthetic comerstone but a crucial component of local e€onomieq induding fishing tourism. and other marine{ehted professions, Statistics ra/eal that the Gulf of Ma(ico shores, wedands, and waters, along with their millioniollar industries, are tundamental to our regional €conorny (source: NOAA Fishedes). Pmposed constuction could havE sltnificad detrirDental implications on this, causing e@logical imbalances and simuttaneously hampering daily routines, recreational actMtles, and 6ren, possibly, our li\€lihoods. The dock qtension ostensibly appears minot but the impact is not. Every inch of expansion poses a sEnmcant risk to our communivs tranquility and accessibility. LetS work colledirely to hah this construction- The preparatiorE for tomorrow stan with the d€cisions lye make today. Please, sign thts pedtion to prevent the dock's 1 lfoot expansion beyond fie 20 feet allof,ed and safeguard our canal! free navigabllity- LetS keep our watert our $,aF of life, unobstructed, F Reen a polaoviol.tof o/,e-# utrl 4/ /a a?7- 31/- a- 0 L d )9- os-6 -7-171Q 3t5 - b5'l-il-yl)-/Y> Vo-zzg't1L/ ?16 -5 7, - r.ro e 3S - qgo -6fro 5aa - e45 - C+1 3 8f,1 'tYz - ^7t5 -- a4 5G 1-Lo5 tooS - t{zl3 /XozosS nnal/7tr'/l,"ft-s7,r' / Jt V.l;a,z,l-rlzr-4,t/. [!a ro.t + SUh' + 'aU t- I It+ PL c v?L3 os.e 0 o,rtr '/\r{- -\r\r/r/ y\ ]v/ {bP 1rv Pq SLlt 6..c- !o u, r.,-\.,,1\ ",.- oN.;a ^J t0 Qvn5It A Ar,t ln 2l// orA{/ ut'n.1' t,10 *rp L(q ooBN ll*^,rroup \ t-l € lt4 rc WWD a :7;tD l)^*.,'-.^-' I Page 586 of 590 Halt The Proposed l3-Foot Dock ElGension Threatening Our Canal Access The Issue ourCornerofparadise,hoEing53trailefsandllhomes,sustaimaUniqueharmonywtthnatureanda€cessibilitytothe Guf of M€ldco. Our daily experhfl€es and lit €lihoods are laced with the ebb and flow of the canal that constitutes our communityslifelhe.AplopoEedlootdockoftensi.onth]eatensdlisbalance,htnderingnotjust]q,s.,f,butallinour "neighborhood of water' ffom navigable access through our (anal' our environment is not iust an aesd|edc comer$one but a Cru(lal cornponent of lo(al economies, includinq fishing, tourlsm, and other marine'rclated professioos. stadsics reveal that the Gulf of Mexico shores, wedands, and waters, along with their millaon-dollar industries, are fundamental to our regaonal €conomy (source: NOAA Fisheries), Proposed Constructi,on@uldhar,esignifiCantd€tr€ntalimPlicationsonthis,causingecologicalimbalancesandsimu]taneously hamperlng dait routines, recreational activities, and even. possibly' our livelihoods' The dock extension odensibty app€ars mino[ but the impact is not. Every inch of e)Qansion Poses a signmcant risk to our communit},,stranquilityandac(essibility.LetSworkcollectivelytohaltthisconstruction.Thepreparationsfortomo'Tow start wi0t d|e decisiom un mafe toOay. ehase, sign thts petition to prettnt the dock's 1lfoot expansion bq/ond the 20 feet allo$red and safegu.td our canal! free navigability' Letl keeP our waters' our tra)ls of lif€' unobstructed' F R€@n i ooiid violat@ ,l/thnr- /ob"'l S, Edmunc{l 11 /t^ 6tzztt-/26') btz-v8b'7elb 267-2a7"{3s7 6?-8oa' lz)s -70)--o77CLta Erdz6' Afi P.,A1 GrxJ l.ri "'. Sl FL Unt y1 3L/l ,/ oC1---1 4, €*.*"- Lllr( ?a *rL ur$ )l ofrYa,tuil.-- 4ry' V+/.ryz, 6zal t "od/a*/ H, q- 6*,1 fLU/ I Page 587 of 590 Page 588 of 590 Halt The Proposed l3-Foot Dock Elcension Threatening The Issue our comer of paradise, housing 63 trailers and I t homes, sustaim a unique harmony with nature and accessibility to the Guf of Mexko- Our daily experiefl(G and livelihoods are laced with the ebb and flol{ of the canal that constiojtes our communityt lifeline- A proposed , 3-foot dod extension threatens this balance. hindering not jtEt mysef. but all in our 'neighborhood of lyater' from na\rigable accrss thrDugh our (anal- Our erNimnment is not iust an aesthetic comer*ooe but a crucial component of local economies, includlng fishing, tourism, and other rnarine.rchted professions. Stadsdcs reveal that dre Gulf of Modco shores, rf,etlands, and waters. along with their millioniollar industries, are fundamental to our reqional economy (sourte: NOAA Fisheries), Proposed construction could have sir.lnificant d€trimental implkudons on this, causing e@logical imbalanc6 and simuttaneousty hampering daily routines, r€qeaional actMties. and ev€n, possibly, our livelihoods. The dock o(ension ostendbly appears minq but dl€ lmpact is not. Every inch of expansion pose5 a significant risk to our communiq6 tranqulllty and accessibility. Lett wort collectively to hah this consmldon. The preparatirns for tomorrow start wi$ dle decisbrE we make today- Please, sign thE petition to prarant the dodCs l }foot expansion beyond fie 20 feet allaved and safeguad our canalS fr€e na\rigability. lets keep our waters, our wa)E of lifu, unokucted' ?,,/*, l/*; Vlhilo' 26220? /ss7 d CrPrcesf , ttr7 Our Canal Access F 89slE-edielJ&h!q! - Page 589 of 590 December 5, 2024 To whom it may concern, In regards to :VA-PL20240007332 and BD-PL20240003998 - 203 Goodland Drive E I am writing on behalf of the adjacent neighboring parcel 01057400005- 205 Goodland Drive East, located immediately east of the site location for the referenced petition. The submitted drawings, for the stated location, are not at all favorable for us/ our property, and we oppose those plans. We oppose those plans, due to the fact that they are requesting a .5’ setback for the proposed dock facility- leaving us barley enough space to slip in a kayak, on the west side of our existing dock. Leaving the west side of our dock inaccessible. We had met with the owner, Noble & Noble LLC, and have come to an agreement to a change in the plans. The agreement in the redesign on the referenced petition, is labeled as the “alternate design”. As it shows, in the “alternate design”, the setbacks that would be considered for VA-PL20240007332 have increased, allowing us (205 Goodland Dr) more room, to be able to continue to have access to the west side of our dock. We understand the logistics of the county setbacks, and as property owners, we believe in the rules for the setbacks, and respect those rules. Also, we understand why variances are granted, in some cases. We are additionally concerned regarding the dock extension : BD-PL20240003998. We are concerned that the proposed extension, will limit the ability to maneuver into our boat slip, when the many factors of boating present themselves: wind, tide, currents, etc. We don’t necessarily oppose the extension, but have concerns that it will negatively impact the in and out of our access on the west side of our dock. We feel the importance of this letter, is for the Hearing Examiner to take the “alternate design” plan, that we (property owners) have agreed on, into consideration, when making a decision. To be sure that the new/ alternate plan is the plan that gets considered, and be “THE PLAN” rather then the plan that has been initially submitted. Thank you Terry Tessarzik Hank Seaman Amanda Tessarzik 205 Goodland Dr East Page 590 of 590 AGENDA COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER WILL HOLD A HEARING AT 1:00 PM ON THURSDAY, DECEMBER 12, 2024, IN CONFERENCE ROOMS 609/610 AT THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING & REGULATION BUILDING, 2800 N. HORSESHOE DRIVE, NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104. THE PUBLIC WILL HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO PROVIDE PUBLIC COMMENTS REMOTE LY, AS WELL AS IN PERSON, DURING THIS PROCEEDING. INDIVIDUALS WHO WOULD LIKE TO PARTICIPATE REMOTELY SHOULD REGISTER AT: https://bit.ly/121224HEX ANY TIME AFTER THE AGENDA IS POSTED ON THE COUNTY WEBSITE, WHICH IS 6 DAYS BEFORE THE MEETING OR THROUGH THE LINK: https://colliercofl.portal.civicclerk.com/ INDIVIDUALS WHO REGISTER WILL RECEIVE AN EMAIL IN ADVANCE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING DETAILING HOW THEY CAN PARTICIPATE REMOTELY IN THIS MEETING. FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE MEETING, EMAIL AILYN PADRON AT Ailyn.Padron@colliercountyfl.gov INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO 5 MINUTES UNLESS OTHERWISE WAIVED BY THE HEARING EXAMINER. PERSONS WISHING TO HAVE WRITTEN OR GRAPHIC MATERIALS INCLUDED IN THE HEARING REPORT PACKETS MUST HAVE THAT MATERIAL SUBMITTED TO COUNTY STAFF 10 DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING. ALL MATERIALS USED DURING THE PRESENTATION AT THE HEARING WILL BECOME A PERMANENT PART OF THE RECORD. ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THE HEARING EXAMINER WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO AND, THEREFORE, MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. DECISIONS OF THE HEARING EXAMINER ARE FINAL UNLESS APPEALED TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS. HEARING PROCEDURES WILL PROVIDE FOR PRESENTATION BY THE APPLICANT, PRESENTATION BY STAFF, PUBLIC COMMENT, AND APPLICANT REBUTTAL. THE HEARING EXAMINER WILL RENDER A DECISION WITHIN 30 DAYS. PERSONS WISHING TO RECEIVE A COPY OF THE DECISION BY MAIL MAY SUPPLY COUNTY STAFF WITH THEIR NAME, ADDRESS, AND A STAMPED, SELF-ADDRESSED ENVELOPE FOR THAT PURPOSE. PERSONS WISHING TO RECEIVE AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF THE DECISION MAY SUPPLY THEIR EMAIL ADDRESS. 1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. REVIEW OF AGENDA 3. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Petition No. CU-PL20240006001 – Fun Time Early Childhood Academy - 3144 Santa Barbara Boulevard – Request for approval of a Conditional Use for the Fun Time Early Childhood Academy to allow for on-site food preparation for the school children and staff only through the expansion of the existing kitchen area, superseding Resolution No. 88-76 and pursuant to subsection 2.03.02(C)(1)(c)(1) of the Collier County Land Development Code, on 1.11± acres located at 3144 Santa Barbara Boulevard in Section 28, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. (Coordinator: Timothy Finn, Planner III) (Commissioner District 3) B. Petition No. PDI-PL20240002891 – Blue Coral Apartments RPUD – 2650 Lamb Lane - Request for a non-conforming use alteration pursuant to LDC Section 9.03.03.B to allow the replacement of a non-conforming manufactured home which was damaged beyond repair in the 2023 31st Street fire. The subject property is ±5 acres and located at 2650 Lamb Lane, approximately 350 feet north of the intersection of Benton Road and Lamb Lane, in Section 24, Township 49 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. (Coordinator: Timothy Finn, Planner III) (Commissioner District 2) C. Petition No. VA-PL20240001659 – 824 & 828 98th AVE – Request for a variance from Land Development Code Section 5.03.02.C.2.b to increase the required RMF-6 zoned fence height from 6 feet to 8 feet on the west and east side property lines and the south rear property line on approximately 0.38 acres located at 824 and 828 98th Ave North, also known as Lots 37, 38 and part of Lot 39, Block 64 of the Naples Park Unit 5 subdivision in Section 28, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (Coordinator: Sean Sammon, Planner III) (Commissioner District 2) D. Petition No. SV-PL20220006266 – Northtide Naples – 3120 North Road - Request for an after-the-fact sign variance from Land Development Code Section 5.06.04.F.1.a. to increase the allowable sign height from 15 feet to 17 feet and from Section 5.06.04.F.1.b to decrease the required setback from 10 feet to 2.7 feet to allow a pole sign for Northtide Naples RV Resort. The subject property is located at the southwest corner of Airport Road and North Road, at 3120 North Road, in Section 2, Township 50 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (Coordinator: John Kelly, Planner III) (Commissioner District 4) E. Petition No. BD-PL20240006028 – 62 Dolphin Circle – Request for a 103-foot boat dock extension from the maximum permitted protrusion of 20 feet allowed by Section 5.03.06.E.1 of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) for waterways greater than 100 feet in width, to allow a boat docking facility protruding a total of 123 feet into a waterway that is 1,064± feet wide, pursuant to LDC Section 5.03.06.H. The subject property is located at 62 Dolphin Circle and is further described as Lot 92, Isles of Capri No. 1, in Section 31, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. (Coordinator: John Kelly, Planner III) (Commissioner District 1) F. Petition No. VA-PL20240007332 – 203 Goodland Dr E – Request for a variance from Land Development Code Section 5.03.06.E.6 to reduce the minimum side yard riparian setbacks from 7.5 feet to zero feet on both side yards for a proposed dock facility on an unplatted boat dock lot with 20± feet of water frontage within a Residential Single- Family-4 Zoning District and the Goodland Zoning Overlay (RSF-4- GZO). The subject property is deeded with and located north and immediately across Pettit Drive from 203 Goodland Drive East in Section 18, Township 52 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. (Companion to BD-PL20240003998) (Coordinator: John Kelly, Planner III) (Commissioner District 1) G. Petition No. BD-PL20240003998 – 203 Goodland Dr. E – Request for a 13-foot boat dock extension, over the maximum 20 feet allowed by Section 5.03.06.E.1 of the Collier County Land Development Code for waterways 100 feet or greater in width, to construct a new dock facility that will protrude a total of 33 feet into a waterway that is 100± feet wide. The subject property is an unplatted boat dock lot deeded with and located north and immediately across Pettit Drive from 203 Goodland Drive East in Section 18, Township 52 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. (Companion to VA- PL20240007332) (Coordinator: John Kelly, Planner III) (Commissioner District 1) 4. OTHER BUSINESS 5. PUBLIC COMMENTS 6. ADJOURN