BCC Minutes 09/19/2024 BSeptember 19, 2024
Page 1
TRANSCRIPT OF THE MEETING OF THE
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Naples, Florida, September 19, 2024
BUDGET HEARING
LET IT BE REMEMBERED that the Board of County
Commissioners, in and for the County of Collier, and also acting as
the Board of Zoning Appeals and as the governing board(s) of such
special districts as have been created according to law and having
conducted business herein, met on this date at 5:05 p.m. in SPECIAL
SESSION in Building "F" of the Government Complex, East Naples,
Florida, with the following Board members present:
Chairman: Chris Hal
Dan Kowal
William L. McDaniel, Jr.
Burt L. Saunders
Rick LoCastro (Absent)
ALSO PRESENT:
Amy Patterson, County Manager
Edward Finn, Deputy County Manager
Jeffrey A. Klatzkow, County Attorney
Troy Miller, Communications & Customer Relations
September 19, 2024
Page 2
MS. PATTERSON: Chair, you have a live mic.
CHAIRMAN HALL: All right. Welcome to the final budget
hearing. Let's get this Pledge of Allegiance rolling.
Commissioner McDaniel, would you lead us please, sir.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: I'd be honored, sir.
(The Pledge of Allegiance was recited in unison.)
MS. PATTERSON: Commissioners, I'm going to hand it over
to Mr. Johnson to start the presentation.
MR. JOHNSON: Good evening Commissioners. For the
record, Christopher Johnson, your director of Corporate, Financial,
and Management Services.
Welcome to our final public budget hearing on the Collier
County Government Fiscal Year '24/'25 budget, which begins
October 1st, 2024, and runs through September 30th, 2025.
Tonight we're going to be discussing the FY '24/'25 millage rates
and the increases over the rolled-back millage rates, we're going to
review and discuss amendments to the tentative budget that was
approved on September 5th, we're going to adopt a resolution
amending that tentative budget, we're going to announce the millage
rates and the percentage changes in property tax rates, then we're
going to adopt a resolution setting the millage rates, followed by the
adoption of the final budget via resolution.
Before I begin the required TRIM processes, I'm going to just
give you one last -- and I promise this time -- one last quick outline
of where we've been on this journey towards the final public hearing.
As you can see on this slide, we started with our first annual
strategic plan AUIR budget policy workshop where we discuss the
utilization of priority-based budgeting approach leveraging the
ResourceX software solution and had discussions on policy
guidelines, including compliance and millage rates.
In March, the Board adopted their budget policy. This policy
September 19, 2024
Page 3
provided the framework for departments to build the budget. In June
at the budget workshop, the County Manager presented the Board
with her recommended budget, and the Board heard presentations
from ResourceX on the progress with our priority-based budget
approach to date.
On July 1st, we received our final taxable value. On July 9th,
the Board adopted the tentative FY '25 millage rates. On July 12th,
the Board received the tentative FY '25 budget document. On
August 13th, we had a discussion on ResourceX priority-based
budgeting return-on-investment report, and staff provided a
presentation on the progress and potential future insight
implementations.
On August 19th, the TRIM notices were sent to all property
owners within the county. On August 27th, we had further
discussion with ResourceX on next steps and the review of the
organizational structure along with a refresher on the tentative budget
in anticipation of the meeting on the 5th.
On September 5th, we had our first public budget hearing where
the Board adopted tentative millage rates including countywide and
unincorporated area millage rates at the rolled-back rate and adopted
the tentative budget. And today we are here for our final budget
hearing.
This slide depicts our agenda for today. The final public budget
hearing must follow a specific format pursuant to the truth in millage
guidelines. Your agenda contains a specific sequence of agenda
items to be covered pursuant to Florida Statute Chapter 200. The
required advertisement for this hearing was published in the Naples
Daily News on Monday, September 16th, 2024.
Agenda and speaker slips are available in the hallway. Anyone
interested in addressing the Board regarding the county budget must
complete a speaker slip. Following some remarks regarding tax
September 19, 2024
Page 4
rates and changes to the tentative budget that was approved at our
previous budget hearing on September 5th, there will be an
opportunity for public comment. That be under Item 1C.
Item #1A
DISCUSSION OF THE FY '24/'25 MILLAGE RATES AND THE
INCREASES OVER THE ROLLED-BACK MILLAGE RATES -
PRESENTED BY CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON – DIVISION
DIRECTOR – CORPORATE FINANCIAL & MANAGEMENT
SERVICES
MR. JOHNSON: With that, I will dive right into Item 1A, a
discussion of the FY '24/'25 millage rates and increases over the
rolled-back millage rates.
With that said, the millage rates in your packet, we have had one
change, and, Mr. County Attorney, if you don't mind just giving a
brief explanation of what we've had to do, because one of these votes
required a unanimous Board vote.
MR. KLATZKOW: There is one MSTU that, because of the
increase in the millage rates, would require five commissioners to
vote. We've talked to Chris. He's going to reduce it down to a
lower number.
MR. JOHNSON: And that millage rate is for Haldeman Creek
Dredging MSTU. I'll try to see if I can use my mouse here to get to
it. We have reduced it from a millage-neutral rate of 1 to a millage
rate of .9480. That represents the rate that can have a two-thirds or
supermajority vote.
So I will start now. State law requires that the first issues to be
discussed are percent increases in millage over rolled-back rate
needed to fund the budget and reasons ad valorem tax revenue above
September 19, 2024
Page 5
the rolled-back rate as calculated on the state DR-420 forms are being
increased.
Rolled-back rate is defined as the tax rate necessary to generate
prior year tax revenues, and this tax rate is calculated not including
taxable values associated with new construction, additions, deletions,
and rehabilitative improvements.
The Board adopted tentative rolled-back millage rates on
September 5th at the budget hearing for the countywide tax rates and
the Unincorporated General Fund. For the General Fund, the
rolled-back rate is 3.0107 per thousand dollars of taxable value; the
Water Pollution Control rolled-back rate is 0.0246 per thousand
dollars of taxable value; the Conservation Collier rolled-back rate is
0.2096 dollars per thousand dollars of taxable value; and for the
Unincorporated Area General Fund, the rolled-back rate is 0.6844 per
thousand dollars of taxable value.
The MSTU millage rates were established per budget policy,
and these budgets were established to cover the operational needs for
FY '25 and any planned capital allocations. Of note, at your last
budget hearing, we also reduced the private road emergency repair
MSTU to zero mils, and as stated earlier, in this roster of millage
rates, you will see Haldeman Creek has reduced to 0.9480 from
1 mil. That is the proposed change.
Tax levies for the General Fund, Conservation Collier, and
Unincorporated Area General Fund together represent the majority of
the total aggregate taxes levied across all county government taxing
authorities for FY '25.
The FY '25 tentative General Fund and Unincorporated Area
General Fund operating and capital budgets, as presented, are based
upon Board-adopted budget policy. Both the General Fund and
Unincorporated Area General Fund proposed tax rates are at the
rolled-back rate.
September 19, 2024
Page 6
Collier County taxable value has increased for FY '25 by
10.33 percent and 10.51 percent within the General Fund and
Unincorporated Area General Fund respectively. Within an
increasing taxable value environment, under rolled-back operating
capital policy guidelines, the rolled-back rate will be lower than the
millage-neutral rate. This is the case for FY '25.
The cumulative aggregate rolled-back rate for all Collier County
taxing authorities, exclusive of debt services, totals 3.7702 dollars per
thousand dollars of taxable value. The proposed aggregate rate for
all Collier County taxing authorities is 3.7672 dollars per thousand
dollars of taxable value. And that, again, is updated based on the
Haldeman Creek MSTU.
And this overall represents a decrease of .08 percent over the
aggregate rolled-back rate. And with that, are there any other
questions on the millage rates before we move on to Item 1B?
(No response.)
Item #1B
DISCUSSION OF FURTHER AMENDMENTS TO THE
TENTATIVE BUDGET – PRESENTED BY CHRISTOPHER
JOHNSON – DIVISION DIRECTOR – CORPORATE FINANCIAL
& MANAGEMENT SERVICES
MR. JOHNSON: All right. Item 1B, review and discussion of
changes to the tentative budget. For tonight's hearing, changes from
the FY '25 tentative budget adopted at our last budget hearing on
September 5th, 2024, as noted in Exhibit 1B -- and, actually, I'm
going to put an updated version here on the visualizer, as we've had
to update this with the changes that are included in Haldeman Creek.
Sorry.
September 19, 2024
Page 7
All right. And these changes are mainly due to a decrease in
the FY '22 forecast loan to the Disaster Fund and the re-appropriation
of those loans in FY '25. Other changes include a few position
transfers and reclassifications and, again, the millage rate associated
with Haldeman Creek.
These budget changes total $25 million. Again, that's due to
the reestablishment of those loans to our disaster fund to aid with the
continuing recovery from Hurricane Ian.
Any questions on any of those changes?
(No response.)
MR. JOHNSON: And I'm just going to put one more thing up
on the visualizer, as it wasn't included in the packet. This is going to
be the budget resolution for Haldeman Creek. And what we've done
here is we've reduced the ad valorem tax, reduced the forecast in the
previous year, and increased the carryforward to account for the
reduction from ad valorem coming into the fund.
Any questions on that at all?
(No response.)
Item #1C
PUBLIC COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS
MR. JOHNSON: All right. And with that, we can move on to
Item 1C, which is public comment.
MS. PATTERSON: Troy, I messed up the computer.
MR. MILLER: Oh, okay. All right. Let me do a couple
things here, then. We're going to start with Michele Lenhard, and
she will be followed by Andy Wells-Bean.
MS. LENHARD: Good evening, Commissioners. I'm
Michele Lenhard, chair of Conservation Collier Land Acquisition
September 19, 2024
Page 8
Advisory Committee, and I thank you for the opportunity to comment
on FY '25 tentative budget.
As the budget process concludes this evening after many months
of work, I focus my comments on the public expectations of the
program supported over the last 20 years. We are tasked with
aligning funding decisions to meet them.
There is an established need. When the first phase of
acquisition totaling 4,055 acres concluded in 2011, this board
authorized the use of maintenance funds to purchase an additional
three properties totaling 237 acres at a cost of $3.1 million. These
funds were repaid after the passage of the '21 referendum.
During the referendum, presentations made before this board on
January 28th, 2020, estimated the potential acreage for acquisition
within the county, and it was totaling 98,951 acres. It included
39,719 acres that are within the RSLA program and that are not
protected with an SSA designation.
There is value to our program, the quality of life. Population
growth predictions for the county continually are outperforming
much of the state. One unique attribute and draw to the area is the
quantity and quality of open space in the county.
There is trust for a long-term funding source. Since 2022, the
acquisition program has ramped up and been streamlined. Trust
fund balances are critical. According to the annual report for
Conservation Collier, goals for maintenance fundings are at
$32 million alone. I encourage us to look at funding as -- beyond
our current year and to provide the resources for the coming years so
that available parcels may be acquired.
On behalf of the committee, I request that you support the full
rolled-back millage rate for this program, and I request that funds
transferred in FY '24 be repaid to assure the long-term financial
health of Conservation Collier.
September 19, 2024
Page 9
Thank you.
MR. MILLER: Your next speaker is Andy Wells-Bean. He'll
be followed by Gary Bromley.
MR. WELLS-BEAN: Good evening. I'm glad to be able to
speak with you-all again. I appreciate the opportunity to weigh in on
this year's budget.
I have read the Conservation Collier draft annual report, and I
have followed closely the Board of County Commissioners'
discussion and votes with regards to Conservation Collier and
broader conservation policies, and I'm very pleased with the hard
work on behalf of the wildlife and wild places that I've seen over the
last year. The efficiency changes and the renewed energy behind
land acquisition are all very promising. And I think that from our
look, the budget looks sufficient for short-term needs. And I see lots
of good opportunities to repay the borrowed money needed for the
long term coming soon.
So I would encourage this board to approve the budget with
regards to Conservation Collier as it is currently written but also
make a plan to repay those borrowed monies. Whether it happens a
little bit, little by little, or whether it happens by extending the
program or some other creative solution, we encourage that to -- a
plan to be put into place so that we can ensure the health of that
program for the long term, both for the wildlife, the wild places, and
for all the people in Collier County who love them.
Thank you very much.
MR. MILLER: Your next speaker is Gary Bromley, and he
will be followed by Brad Cornell.
MR. BROMLEY: Good afternoon, commissioners, and thank
you for the opportunity. I'm always grateful to have the opportunity
to speak with you.
Last time I was here at the last budget meeting, I talked about
September 19, 2024
Page 10
my enthusiasm 11 years ago to find out this enlightened program of
Conservation Collier existed. And it was something that I found I
could immediately and fully support for all the kinds of reasons that
the two previous speakers have noted.
So what I've noticed at the last budget meeting is there seemed
to be somewhat of a drift back; discussion about replenishing the
funds for Conservation Collier. I was somewhat hopeful in the very
beginning that there was an acknowledgment that that would be an
appropriate thing to do, but then when I listened to the discussion that
took place on the commission at the last budget meeting, I started to
get a whole different feel for it in terms of it seems like there's an
interest in maybe not moving forward with replenishment at all or
maybe just for a year's period of time to see how things go.
It doesn't -- I'm a contributor, like everybody in Collier County,
in terms of the program. And I don't mind that there's a lot of money
sitting. I have a personal portfolio where I have a substantial amount
of money in government treasuries. And why do I do that? Is
because if all my other investments go caput, I think that's one of the
safest ways I can come out of the -- out of the dust if that would
happen.
So that money is at a rate that's not keeping up with inflation,
but I'm okay with that. So it's the same kind of idea that, you know,
waiting is not -- let me rephrase. I'm thinking that when I first heard
of the program and that money was going to be put aside according to
the electorate wanting it to be put aside, that was huge. And to me
that's dedicated funds, and transferring the money away, you know,
and not replenishing it doesn't seem consistent with what the
electorate was interested in doing here. And I think most people are
like me and that they would be surprised to learn that there's been this
transfer of money and there's a consideration that it will not be
replenished.
September 19, 2024
Page 11
Thank you for your time.
MR. MILLER: Perfectly timed.
Your next speaker is Brad Cornell. He will be followed by
Gaylene Vasaturo.
MR. CORNELL: Good evening, Mr. Chair and
Commissioners. Thank you for the chance to weigh in on the
budget. I'm Brad Cornell, and I'm here on behalf of Audubon
Florida and Audubon Western Everglades.
First, I want to thank you also, as Andy Wells-Bean did, for
your constructive revision of the ordinance back in March. It was an
important step for making this more efficient program, and that's
been really, really important. So thank you for that support of this
program through that strategy.
And as evidence, I just want to cite a few statistics. Since 2022,
the program has bought 90 properties that total 683 acres for about 15
and a half million dollars. And pending now, that has accelerated.
There are now 2,337 acres pending acquisition that are valued at
about $26.6 million, and those are 25 properties, including the
Williams farm, 1,400 acres that Conservation Collier is buying. So
this is tremendous. That's a lot of great conservation land, and we
need it. We need more than that.
The budget resources for Conservation Collier appear adequate
for this coming year and for the maintenance in the short-term;
however, there is a recurring commitment needed, and Audubon is
concerned resources are not sufficient for the long-term
responsibilities in completing vital, complex local ecosystem
acquisitions.
Only Conservation Collier is working on projects like the Horse
Pen Strand in north Golden Gate Estates, which is vital for wildfire
protection and water supply there and the habitat corridor links
between the panther refuge and through the Bob Gore Preserve,
September 19, 2024
Page 12
several hundred acres, across Everglades Boulevard to the thousands
of acres of Rural Fringe Mixed-Use District conservation easements
all the way to the North Belle Meade Preserve lands, and then those
all connect to the 55,000-acre Picayune Strand restoration project
south of I-75. It's a big ecosystem that's all connected, and you guys
are the only ones working on the Golden Gate Estates/North Belle
Meade parts of that.
Audubon Western Everglades and Audubon Florida support a
continued robust levy of the maximum millage rate for this program
and repayment of the land maintenance trust fund. There are many
ways to do that. If it were up to me, I would recommend you do an
incremental approach sooner than later for interest-generating
purposes. You know, the sooner we get it in there, the more interest
we can generate. But whatever you do, let's make a plan now.
Thank you for your continued support of this popular and
essential Collier County conservation program that works for every
single Collier County citizen.
Thanks.
CHAIRMAN HALL: Hey, Brad. I've got a quick question.
Since 2022, 683 acres, was that 15 million?
MR. CORNELL: 15.5 million, that's right.
CHAIRMAN HALL: Thanks.
MR. MILLER: Your next speaker is Gaylene Vasaturo. She'll
be followed by John Meo, Jr.
MS. VASATURO: Good evening, commissioners.
At the last budget meeting, we anticipated that the Board might
set up a plan to pay back the $30 million taken from Conservation
Collier. Instead, the discussion we heard was that the Board may not
pay back the 30 million or it might pay it back years later. Also, the
Board rolled back the millage rate for Conservation Collier to even
less than last year.
September 19, 2024
Page 13
So as the cost of land is going up, Conservation Collier's
purchasing power is going down. And as you know, in 2020
residents voted resoundingly yes, tax us to continue funding
Conservation Collier to acquire and manage environmentally
sensitive properties for protection of water quality, water resources,
wildlife habitat, and public open space.
Having voted for this program three times, voters clearly place a
high value on preserving land for these purposes. We recognize this
is important for our quality of life.
So I ask, please fully fund Conservation Collier at .25 mils.
The voters agreed to this. Secondly -- and this was to respond to
Commissioner LoCastro, who may not be on, but others of you have
commented about the funds just sitting in the account wasting away,
accumulating. We hope that funds do build up to a sufficient level
over the remaining seven years to be able to manage the preserves
into perpetuity and also to be able to have adequate funds on hand to
acquire a large or expensive but important parcel if such parcel -- and
when such parcel comes up.
Draining the acquisition account is not a goal. We support the
program accumulating funds so that it has money to acquire a really
significant parcel if such a parcel should become available, a parcel
that can reassemble fragmented landscapes to restore and protect
wetland flowways and the wildlife corridors that Brad talked about, a
parcel that can work with nature to help -- to help clean our water and
to provide flood protection.
So we are concerned that the Board borrowed 30 million from
Conservation Collier and has not committed to repaying the funds nor
set up a plan to begin paying back the funds. Next time you ask us
to vote for a sales tax increase or something like that, we will
remember what you did with Conservation Collier money, and we
also -- what you do going forward.
September 19, 2024
Page 14
So please start paying back the 30 million. Thank you. Thank
you for listening.
MR. MILLER: Your next speaker is John Meo. Is it Meo?
Am I saying it right? John Meo, Jr., and he will be followed by
Kathi Meo.
MR. MEO: Hi. Good evening, Commissioners. I'm John
Meo, 2925 Coco Lakes Drive.
I'm going to take a different tact. So far most of the speakers
are for paying the money back. I'm going to take it from the point of
view that -- and I'm not as well educated on conservation issues, but
I'm simply aware that every time you remove a piece of land from
private hands and put it into the hands of the municipality, the
taxpayer, myself, is burdened with maintaining that.
And to me, as a -- maybe the voters voted for this six,
seven -- six, seven years ago, but I'd really wish the Commission
would understand that most people don't have reserves like the other
fellow mentioned. So they're living on a day-to-day budget, even
here in Collier County, which is one of the wealthiest counties in
Florida.
So if this money was to be paid back, I saw no evidence of that
in the prior hearings. So what I'd like to say and sum it up in this
way is that I think that protecting the population of Collier by not
raising taxes is the best thing that we can do as we move forward.
We have inflation that's at an all-time rate [sic]. People go to Publix,
and they're astounded by what a few groceries cost.
And I understand -- I'm not anti-conservation, love conservation,
but at this point I think we need to get a sense of priority, and the
priority right now is we have an extremely inflationary economy, and
on the horizon, we may have, you know, a great deal of emergency
issues that might arise in this county. And I think it's how you
would utilize the monies you have to the best ability.
September 19, 2024
Page 15
It appears to me from the meetings that previously took place
that Collier has -- Conservation Collier has sufficient funds and, with
the interest rates where they are, that's able to maintain their expenses
as an organization.
So at this point, I would ask you that -- review your last meeting
notes of this where it was said that we were going to pay something
back, and if you can show evidence of that, then fine, but my
recollection is there was no mention of paying any of this money
back. So I thank you, and I appreciate if you can consider the
taxpayers in this community.
Thank you very much.
MR. MILLER: Your next speaker is Kathi Meo. She will be
followed on Zoom by Gordon Brumwell.
MS. MEO: Thank you, Commissioners. I also -- Kathi Meo.
Do you want my address?
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: We already have it.
MS. MEO: You already know it. You know where to find me.
Okay.
I'd like to commend all of you for your recent vote to keep our
taxes down. We really appreciate that.
But going to the issue of the Conservation Collier, when this
was talked about and voted on last year -- and we were very involved
with it at that time -- I don't remember any talk about replenishing
anything whatsoever, no repayment.
And I know it's been previously mentioned in your prior
meeting on the 5th that there's plenty of money in that fund, and it's
very well-funded. It's fully funded. It's healthy.
And as my husband just mentioned, just the interest alone with
the rate that it's getting -- I think it makes over a million a year -- that
is more than enough to pay the maintenance and -- or, you know, that
they have. But, you know, the maintenance, as I understand, is very,
September 19, 2024
Page 16
very expensive. And every time you have another parcel of land
taken out of the tax roll, that's less taxes coming into the county, and
the maintenance with the exotics and so forth that are on there
becomes very, very expensive.
Yes, the taxpayers did vote for up to -- was it .25 mils or 2.5
mils, but it doesn't mean you have to fund to the maximum. You
could give them 0. You could give them .1. It doesn't mandate that
you have to fund it.
And it's also my understanding that the reserves in Collier
County are very low and -- due to Hurricane Ian and all that you had
to do for that. We're still in hurricane season. Who knows what
other emergencies are going to be coming up.
So that money should be kept for other very important things
that are mandatory that you will have to do. This is not mandatory.
You do not have to pay it back. You didn't borrow it. You took it,
but you do not have to pay it back. That's my understanding.
So I thank you for your consideration.
MR. MILLER: Your next speaker on Zoom is Gordon
Brumwell, and he will be followed by Joseph Foster.
Gordon, I see you're unmuted. Gordon, you have three
minutes.
MR. BRUMWELL: Can you hear me now?
MR. MILLER: Yes, sir.
MR. BRUMWELL: Hi, Gordon Brumwell here. I'll expand
on a pastor's thoughts on Conservation Collier from prior meetings.
God said, "Let the land produce vegetation according to their various
kinds." That's biodiversity. God saw it was good.
God made wild animals according to their kinds. That's
biodiversity. God saw it was good.
God said, "I give you every seed-bearing plant." This is a
priority. The longer the time horizon, the more a portfolio should be
September 19, 2024
Page 17
diversified.
Creation is God's well-diversified asset allocated trust fund for
us. God saw it was very good.
So imagine God's disappointment as we dismantle this brightest
point of light to binge at the crack of consumerism and the ecstasy of
expansion. Wow, pretty heavy, huh? Imagine God's
disappointment as we externalize the costs of our addictions and so
make the rest of creation pay.
The plants and panthers, God love them, but they're dumb. We
are smart. We can budget. We can help our fellow man who is in,
perhaps, unlucky straits. Science suggests we do better in proximity
to green space, supporting the idea that it was good. There should be
green space near all of us. Conservation Collier helps steward
creation and increase our exposure to it.
To, yes, acquire/protect sensitive lands, but it's also mandated to
acquire sensitive lands with the best human value, including equitable
distribution.
Seventy-seven percent -- and I'm looking at a ballot -- or .25, not
up to, that's a vision of creation integrated into the built environment
as God intended.
We are preserving properties faster, but the electorate senses we
are so far behind, which is why people are okay with conservation
funds stacking up temporarily. We have a vision. The .25 versus
the proposal, check my math, results in about $9 extra. Losing it
sums to 6 million, about.
We can figure out how to budget $9 as smart people, but the
land loss to not collecting the 6 million is irreplaceable because we're
not smart enough to create creation, thus making this a priority. It
was good.
So please increase the rate just a tad today, and please lock in
returning the 30 million. Leaving it to some random board down the
September 19, 2024
Page 18
road risks it never happening.
Thank you very much.
MR. MILLER: Your next speaker is Joseph Foster, and he is
our final speaker of the day.
Mr. Foster, you're being prompted to unmute yourself, if you'll
do that at this time. Mr. Foster, we are prompting you to unmute.
I've always wanted to do this. Going once, going twice.
Back to you, sir.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Is that Judge Foster?
MR. MILLER: It just says "Joseph Foster." I don't know, sir.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: He might have been calling
in wanting us to send more money to the Court system.
CHAIRMAN HALL: Mr. Johnson.
MR. JOHNSON: All right, Commissioners. Any discussion
before we move into the resolution to adopt the tentative budget?
(No response.)
Item #1D
RESOLUTION 2024-170: RESOLUTION AMENDING THE
TENTATIVE BUDGET - MOTION TO ADOPT BY
COMMISSIONER MCDANIEL; SECONDED BY
COMMISSIONER SAUNDERS – ADOPTED (COMMISSIONER
LOCASTRO ABSENT)
MR. JOHNSON: All right. Commissioners, under Item 1D is
a resolution amending the tentative budget incorporating the previous
discussed changes including the last change to Haldeman Creek. At
this time, staff would request a motion to approve the resolution
amending the tentative budgets.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: So moved.
September 19, 2024
Page 19
COMMISSIONER SAUNDERS: Second.
CHAIRMAN HALL: Moved and seconded. All in favor, say
aye.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Aye.
CHAIRMAN HALL: Aye.
COMMISSIONER SAUNDERS: Aye.
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: Aye.
CHAIRMAN HALL: All opposed?
(No response.)
MR. JOHNSON: All right. Now the fun part.
Item #1E
PUBLIC READING OF THE MILLAGE RATES, ROLLED-BACK
MILLAGE RATE, AND PERCENT CHANGE FROM THE
ROLLED-BACK MILLAGE RATES - READ INTO THE RECORD
BY CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON, DIVISION DIRECTOR,
CORPORATE FINANCIAL & MANAGEMENT SERVICES
MR. JOHNSON: That takes us to Item 1E, announcement of
the millage rates. As I'm sure you are aware, the Florida TRIM
statute requires that the millage rates, rolled-back millage rate, and
percent change from the rolled-back millage rates be read into the
record prior to the adoption of the millage rates under Agenda
Item 1F.
If it pleases the Board, I can begin. If you want to follow along,
I'll have the millage rates on the screen. Again, the millage rate for
Haldeman Creek has changed and will be different than what's in
your packet.
CHAIRMAN HALL: Rapid fire.
MR. JOHNSON: I would try, but then Terri is going to not be
September 19, 2024
Page 20
happy with me, so...
All right. Here we go.
General Fund 00001, the proposed millage rate is 3.0107; the
rolled-back millage rate is 3.0107. The percent change from the
rolled-back rate is 0 percent.
Water Pollution Control Fund 1017, the proposed millage rate is
0.0246; the rolled-back millage rate is 0.0246. The percent change
from the rolled-back rate is 0 percent.
Conservation Collier Fund 1061, the proposed millage rate is
0.2096; the rolled-back millage rate is 0.2096. The percent change
from the rolled-back rate is 0 percent.
Unincorporated General Fund 1011, the proposed millage rate is
0.6844; the rolled-back millage rate is 0.6844. The percent change
from the rolled-back rate is 0 percent.
Golden Gate Community Center Fund 1605, the proposed
millage rate is 0.1862; the rolled-back millage rate is 0.1756. The
percent change from the rolled-back rate is 6.04 percent.
Victoria Park Drainage Fund 1608, the proposed millage rate is
0.3814; the rolled-back millage rate is 0.3567. The percent change
from the rolled-back rate is 6.92 percent.
Naples Park Drainage Fund 1613, the proposed millage rate is
0.0041; the rolled-back millage rate is 0.0038. The percent change
from the rolled-back rate is 7.89 percent.
Vanderbilt Beach MSTU Fund 1617, the proposed millage rate
is 0.4650; the rolled-back millage rate is 0.4650. The percent
change from the rolled-back rate is 0 percent.
Ochopee Fire Control Fund 1040, the proposed millage rate is
4.0000; the rolled-back millage rate is 3.7079. The percent change
from the rolled-back rate is 7.88 percent.
Goodland/Horrs Island Fire MSTU 1041, the proposed millage
rate is 1.2760; the rolled-back millage rate is 1.1955. The percent
September 19, 2024
Page 21
change from the rolled-back rate is 6.73 percent.
Sabal Palm Road MSTU Fund 1619, the proposed millage rate
is 0.0000; the rolled-back millage rate is 0.0000. The percent
change from the rolled-back rate is 0.
Lely Golf Estates Beautification MSTU Fund 1620, proposed
millage rate is 2.0000; the rolled-back millage rate is 1.8994. The
percent change from the rolled-back rate is 5.3 percent.
Golden Gate Parkway Beautification MSTU Fund 1621, the
proposed millage rate is 0.5000; the rolled-back millage rate is
0.4644. The percent change from the rolled-back rate is
7.67 percent.
Hawksridge Stormwater Pumping MSTU Fund 1622, the
proposed millage rate is 0.0318; the rolled-back millage rate is
0.0298. The percent change from the rolled-back rate is
6.71 percent.
Radio Road Beautification MSTU Fund 1625, the proposed
millage rate is 0.1000; the rolled-back millage rate is 0.0000. This is
a reinstated millage, so there is no percent change over rolled-back.
Forest Lakes Roadway and Drainage MSTU Fund 1626, the
proposed millage rate is 4.0000; the rolled-back millage rate is
3.7201. The percent change from the rolled-back rate is
7.52 percent.
Immokalee Beautification MSTU Fund 1629, the proposed
millage rate is 1.0000; the rolled-back millage rate is 0.9521. The
percent change from the rolled-back rate is 5.03 percent.
Bayshore/Avalon Beautification MSTU Fund 1630, the
proposed millage rate is 2.1104; the rolled-back millage rate is
1.8030. The percent change from the rolled-back rate is
17.05 percent.
Haldeman Creek Dredging MSTU Fund 1631, the proposed
millage rate is 0.9480; the rolled-back millage rate is 0.8154. The
September 19, 2024
Page 22
percent change from the rolled-back rate is 16.26 percent.
Rock Road MSTU Fund 1632, the proposed millage rate is
0.7224; the rolled-back millage rate is 0.7224. The percent change
from the rolled-back rate is 0 percent.
Vanderbilt Waterways MSTU Fund 1635, the proposed millage
rate is 0.3000; the rolled-back millage rate is 0.2798. The percent
change from the rolled-back rate is 7.22 percent.
Forest Lakes Debt Service Fund 2014, the proposed millage rate
is 0.0000; the rolled-back millage rate is 0.0000. The percent
change from the rolled-back rate is 0 percent.
Blue Sage MSTU Fund 3080, the proposed millage rate is
3.0000; the rolled-back millage rate is 2.8690. The percent change
from the rolled-back rate is 4.57 percent.
Collier County Lighting Fund 1601, proposed millage rate is
0.1025; the rolled-back millage rate is 0.0960. The percent change
from the rolled-back rate is 6.77 percent.
42nd Avenue Southeast MSTU Fund 1637, the proposed millage
rate is 1.0000; the rolled-back millage rate is 0.9858. The percent
change from the rolled-back rate is 1.44 percent.
Palm River Sidewalk MSTU Fund 1638, proposed millage rate
is 0.5000; the rolled-back millage rate is 0.4777. The percent
change from the rolled-back rate is 4.67 percent.
Private Road Emergency Repair MSTU Fund 1639, the
proposed millage rate is 0.0000. The rolled-back millage rate is
0.0000. This is a new MSTU. There's no calculated change from
rolled-back rate.
Pelican Bay MSTBU Fund 1008, proposed millage rate is
0.0857; the rolled-back millage rate is 0.0792. The percent change
from the rolled-back rate is 8.21 percent.
Commissioners, the aggregate millage rate proposed is 3.7672,
the rolled-back rate is 3.7702, and the percent change from the
September 19, 2024
Page 23
rolled-back rate is negative .08 percent.
And I'm going to look around to make sure I got all those right.
All right. And from there, there's just one more thing I want to
put on the projector because this did change the tax amounts as well
ever so slightly. So this is your new tax table. Looking here,
Haldeman Creek was reduced to 312,239, and the total aggregate
taxes will be 573,558,544.
Item #1F
RESOLUTION 2024-171: ADOPTION OF THE RESOLUTION
SETTING THE MILLAGE RATES. NOTE: A SEPARATE
MOTION IS REQUIRED FOR THE DEPENDENT DISTRICT
MILLAGE RATES: AND A SEPARATE MOTION IS REQUIRED
FOR THE REMAINING MILLAGE RATES - MOTION TO
ADOPT DEPENDENT DISTRICT MILLAGE RATE BY
COMMISSIONER SAUNDERS: SECONDED BY
COMMISSIONER MCDANIEL; ADOPTED (COMMISSIONER
LOCASTRO ABSENT); MOTION TO ADOPT REMAINING
MILLAGE RATE BY COMMISSIONER SAUNDERS;
SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER KOWAL – ADOPTED
(COMMISSIONER LOCASTRO ABSENT)
All right. Mr. Chairman, Commissioners, Item 1F on your
agenda is the adoption of the resolution setting the FY '24/'25 millage
rates. And if I may, a separate motion is required for the dependent
district millage rates and the remaining millage rates. So if we could
have two separate motions, the first motion being adopting the
dependent taxing district millage rates.
COMMISSIONER SAUNDERS: Mr. Chairman, I'll move for
approval.
September 19, 2024
Page 24
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: I'll second it.
CHAIRMAN HALL: Moved and seconded. All in favor, say
aye.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Aye.
CHAIRMAN HALL: Aye.
COMMISSIONER SAUNDERS: Aye.
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: Aye.
MR. JOHNSON: The second motion adopting the remaining
millage rates.
COMMISSIONER SAUNDERS: Mr. Chairman, I'll make a
motion to approve the remaining millage rates.
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: Second.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Second -- third.
CHAIRMAN HALL: Fourth. All in favor, say aye.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Aye.
CHAIRMAN HALL: Aye.
COMMISSIONER SAUNDERS: Aye.
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: Aye.
Item #1G
RESOLUTION 2024-172: RESOLUTION TO ADOPT THE
FINAL BUDGET BY FUND. NOTE: A SEPARATE MOTION IS
REQUIRED FOR THE DEPENDENT DISTRICT MILLAGE
RATES; AND A SEPARATE MOTION IS REQUIRED FOR THE
REMAINING MILLAGE RATES. MOTION TO ADOPT
DEPENDENT DISTRICT MILLAGE RATES BY
COMMISSIONER MCDANIEL; SECONDED BY
COMMISSIONER SAUNDERS – ADOPTED (COMMISSIONER
LOCASTRO ABSENT) - MOTION TO ADOPT REMAINING
MILLAGE RATE BY COMMISSIONER MCDANIEL;
September 19, 2024
Page 25
SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER KOWAL – ADOPTED
(COMMISSIONER LOCASTRO ABSENT)
MR. JOHNSON: All right. Commissioners, that brings us on
to the resolution to adopt the final budget. This is Item 1G. This
action requires a separate motion, again, for the dependent district
budgets and a separate motion for the remaining budgets. The first
motion, adopting the dependent districts budgets by fund.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: So moved.
COMMISSIONER SAUNDERS: Second.
CHAIRMAN HALL: Moved and seconded. All in favor, say
aye.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Aye.
CHAIRMAN HALL: Aye.
COMMISSIONER SAUNDERS: Aye.
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: Aye.
CHAIRMAN HALL: Moving right along.
MR. JOHNSON: And a second motion adopting the final
budgets for the remaining funds.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: So moved.
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: Second.
CHAIRMAN HALL: Moved and seconded. All in favor for
that, say aye.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Aye.
CHAIRMAN HALL: Aye.
COMMISSIONER SAUNDERS: Aye.
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: Aye.
MR. JOHNSON: And, Commissioners, if I may, before we
adjourn, I would like to take this opportunity to first thank the Board
for your vision on developing a FY '25 budget a little differently,
using the priority-based budget process this year, and supporting staff
September 19, 2024
Page 26
through what was a very, very long budget cycle, as it always is.
I'd also like to thank the County Manager and the Deputy
County Manager and all the professionals in the agency for their
dedication and hard work developing the budget this year.
We also need to thank the constitutional officers, including the
Sheriff, the Clerk, the Tax Collector, Property Appraiser, and the
Supervisor of Elections. I need to thank Court Administration as
well and the staff at the County Attorney's Office. And last, but not
least, I'd like to thank the staff of the budget office sitting behind here
today and watching from home.
And with that, Mr. Chairman, that concludes our budget
presentation.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: We've dubbed them "the fab
four."
MR. JOHNSON: There we go. There we go.
CHAIRMAN HALL: You got a unanimous head nod, too,
after you finished all those numbers. All of them said, one, two,
three --
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: At the same time, they
were --
MR. JOHNSON: We've been practicing all day. The
only -- until we had to change the other one, we had to do it again,
so...
CHAIRMAN HALL: Well, Mr. Johnson, job well done. And
I am not going to miss you reading the timeline for the 19th time,
until it's time to do it again.
So with that, we're adjourned -- oh, go ahead.
COMMISSIONER SAUNDERS: I'd like to make a couple
comments.
CHAIRMAN HALL: Oh, I don't have a thing, so I didn't know
you --
September 19, 2024
Page 27
COMMISSIONER SAUNDERS: Oh, I'm sorry. I thought
you did.
CHAIRMAN HALL: Nope.
COMMISSIONER SAUNDERS: Just real quick, I want to
thank staff for everything that you've done in terms of the budget.
Tremendous job. And I want to thank Commissioner Hall for really
introducing us to ResourceX and taking a look at the budget in a
different way, and I appreciate that. That's a job well done.
CHAIRMAN HALL: Thank you.
COMMISSIONER SAUNDERS: I also want to just make a
couple comments in reference to Conservation Collier and to our
budget in general.
Obviously, today we are looking at the issues dealing with
inflation and things of that nature, and we have reduced the millage
rate to the rolled-back millage rate. That's the second year in a row
that that's occurred. And so we are looking at the needs of our
current taxpayers.
At the same time, we need to keep in mind our future taxpayers
and our future residents long after we're gone, and that's one of the
purposes of Conservation Collier. I know that that is -- that there's
some issues here with some folks in terms of is this a
well-thought-out program? Is it something that we should continue?
Should we repay the money that was taken out of the program? I
think that it's important for us to look to the future as well as looking
to the present. And so I'm encouraging the Board to keep that in
mind.
Conservation Collier's a 10-year program only in the sense that
it's a 10-year program for collections of taxes. That doesn't mean
that taxes are collected in 10 years, and they're all spent in that same
10-year period. If at the end of the 10-year period we have $50
million, $75 million still in the bank, we're looking at purchases into
September 19, 2024
Page 28
the long-term future as well as the maintenance.
So as important as it is to take care of our current taxpayers and
to keep taxes as low as possible, it's also important to keep in mind
that in the long-term future, this type of a program is -- I believe is
critically important.
So I'm hoping that we do ultimately put those funds back into
Conservation Collier. I hope that we ultimately continue just putting
that program in a position of importance going forward.
So thank you, Mr. Chairman.
CHAIRMAN HALL: You bet.
Commissioner McDaniel.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Yes. You know -- I'm going
to keep my comments because we're shy Commissioner LoCastro
today, and I don't want us to be -- I don't think it's fair. He got tied
up in travel, and I don't want us to be debating a circumstance that we
know we're going to have to deal with.
One of the things that I'd like to say is I -- we know what the
budget process is and the timelines. And so what I would like to do
is engage in more in-depth discussions at our commission meetings.
I don't think we need to have a workshop, because at workshops we
get to sit around and talk about things and not take any votes.
So I would -- I would suggest that in -- because when do we
start the '25/'26 budget process?
MR. JOHNSON: I think it's 10/1, but...
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Exactly. So we just adopted
the budget for '24/'25, and we start the next year on October 1st.
So my suggestion is belay the discussions tonight with regard to
how we're going to do what we're going to do, but let's make a
commitment to the community that these conversations are going to
come forth on a more regular basis so that we can reach a consensus
on how we do what we do.
September 19, 2024
Page 29
CHAIRMAN HALL: You good?
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: I'm good.
CHAIRMAN HALL: All right. Thank you, Commissioner
McDaniel, Commissioner Saunders.
With that, we're adjourned.
*******
September 19, 2024
There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned
by order of the Chair at 5:56 p.m.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS/EX
OFFICIO GOVERNING BOARD(S) OF
SPECIAL DISTRICTS UNDER ITS CONTROL
kvatok
CHRIS L, CHAIRMAN
ATTEST
CRYSTAL'K. KINZEL, CLERK
These minutes approved by the Board on is , as presented IV
or as corrected
TRANSCRIPT PREPARED ON BEHALF OF FORT MYERS COURT REPORTING
BY TERRI L. LEWIS, REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL COURT REPORTER, FPR-C,
AND NOTARY PUBLIC.
Page 20