HEX Agenda 09/26/2024Collier County Hearing Examiner Page 1 Printed 9/19/2024
COLLIER COUNTY
Collier County Hearing Examiner
AGENDA
Growth Management Department
Conference Rooms 609/610
2800 Horseshoe Drive North
Naples, FL 34104
September 26, 2024
1: 00 PM
Andrew W. J. Dickman, Esq., AICP
Hearing Examiner
Note: Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes unless otherwise waived by the Hearing
Examiner. Persons Wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the hearing report
packets must have that material submitted to County staff at Ailyn.Padron@CollierCountyFL.gov
10 days prior to the Hearing. All materials used during presentation at the hearing will become a
permanent part of the record.
Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Hearing Examiner will need a record of the
proceedings pertaining thereto, and therefore may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the
proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to
be based. Decisions of the Hearing Examiner are final unless appealed to the Board of County
Commissioners.
Hearing Procedures will provide for presentation by the Applicant, presentation by staff, public
comment and applicant rebuttal. The Hearing Examiner will render a decision within 30 days.
Persons wishing to receive a copy of the decision by mail may supply County staff with their name,
address, and a stamped, self-addressed envelope for that purpose. Persons wishing to receive an
electronic copy of the decision may supply their email address.
September 2024
Collier County Hearing Examiner Page 2 Printed 9/19/2024
1. Pledge of Allegiance
2. Review of Agenda
3. Advertised Public Hearing
A. Petition No. PDI-PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons – Vanderbilt Way and Buckstone
Drive - Request for an insubstantial change to Ordinance No. 2019-34, the Vanderbilt
Commons Planned Unit Development (PUD), to amend Section 5.17.C so that the section no
longer applies to Lots 5 and 6. The Vanderbilt Commons PUD was originally established as
the Carolina Village PUD under Ordinance No. 2005-19, as amended. The PUD name was
changed to the Vanderbilt Commons PUD by Ordinance No. 2017-47, as amended. The
±2.51-acre subject property is within the ±14.49-acre PUD and located in the northwest
quadrant of the intersection of Vanderbilt Way and Buckstone Drive in Section 34,
Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Eric Ortman,
Planner III] (Commissioner District 3)
B. Petition No. PDI-PL20240004116 – Naples Preserve Villas, LLC - Santa Barbara
Boulevard, approximately one-half mile north of Rattlesnake-Hammock Road - Requests
an insubstantial change to the Onyx RPUD, Ordinance 16-24 for (1), the modification to
Exhibit B Table 1 – Residential Development Standards to add internal development
standards for a platted townhouse development; and (2) a deviation from LDC 4.07.02.G.1,
Open Space Requirements, which requires Residential PUD districts to provide a minimum
of 60% useable open space to allow 40% useable open space. The subject 8.72 +/- acre
parcel is located on the east side of Santa Barbara Boulevard, approximately one-half mile
north of Rattlesnake-Hammock Road in Section 16, Township 50 South, Range 26 East,
Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Timothy Finn, Planner III] (Commissioner District
1)
C. Petition No. SV-PL20240007875 – One Naples MPUD – Southbay Drive north of Vanderbilt
Beach Road and east of Gulf Shore Drive - Request for a variance from the Land
Development Code Section 5.06.04.F.9, which requires “On Premises Directional Signs”
located internal to the subdivision or development shall maintain a minimum setback of 10
feet from the property line, to instead allow for directional signs for public parking for
commercial uses located in the One Naples MPUD MU Tract 1, along Southbay Drive north
of Vanderbilt Beach Road and east of Gulf Shore Drive, to be located a minimum of 5 feet
from the property line in Section 32, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County,
Florida. [Coordinator: Sean Sammon, Planner III] (Commissioner District 2)
4. Other Business
5. Public Comments
6. Adjourn
09/26/2024
COLLIER COUNTY
Collier County Hearing Examiner
Item Number: 3.A
Doc ID: 29844
Item Summary: Petition No. PDI-PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons – Vanderbilt Way and Buckstone
Drive - Request for an insubstantial change to Ordinance No. 2019-34, the Vanderbilt Commons Planned Unit
Development (PUD), to amend Section 5.17.C so that the section no longer applies to Lots 5 and 6. The Vanderbilt
Commons PUD was originally established as the Carolina Village PUD under Ordinance No. 2005 -19, as amended.
The PUD name was changed to the Vanderbilt Commons PUD by Ordinance No. 2017-47, as amended. The ±2.51-
acre subject property is within the ±14.49-acre PUD and located in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of
Vanderbilt Way and Buckstone Drive in Section 34, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida.
[Coordinator: Eric Ortman, Planner III] (Commissioner District 3)
Meeting Date: 09/26/2024
Prepared by:
Title: Principal Planner – Zoning
Name: Eric Ortman
09/13/2024 2:08 PM
Submitted by:
Title: Zoning Director – Zoning
Name: Mike Bosi
09/13/2024 2:08 PM
Approved By:
Review:
Hearing Examiner (GMD Approvers) Diane Lynch Review Item Completed 09/16/2024 4:10 PM
Transportation Management Operations Support Evelyn Trimino GMCDD Reviewer Completed
09/17/2024 10:51 AM
Zoning Diane Lynch Review Item Skipped 09/17/2024 12:14 PM
Zoning Ray Bellows Review Item Completed 09/17/2024 12:29 PM
Unknown Jaime Cook GMCDD Reviewer Completed 09/18/2024 11:11 AM
Zoning Mike Bosi Division Director Completed 09/18/2024 2:09 PM
Hearing Examiner Andrew Dickman Meeting Pending 09/26/2024 1:00 PM
3.A
Packet Pg. 3
STAFF REPORT
TO: COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER
FROM: ZONING DIVISION – ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH
MANAGEMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
HEARING DATE: SEPTEMBER 26, 2024
SUBJECT: PDI-PL20240007161, VANDERBILT COMMONS RPUD
APPLICANT/AGENT:
Owner: Agent:
Vanderbilt 951 Apartments, LLC Patrick Vanasse
7742 Alico Road The Neighborhood Company
Fort Myers, FL. 33912 5618 Whispering Willow Way
Fort Myers, FL. 33908
REQUESTED ACTION:
The petitioner requests an insubstantial change (PDI) to Ordinance No. 2019-34 for the Vanderbilt
Commons Planned Unit Development (PUD) to amend Section 5.17.C so that the section no longer applies
to Lots 5 and 6 (Attachment 1).
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION:
The subject parcel ±2.7-acre parcel is part of the ±15-acre PUD, which is in the northwest quadrant of the
intersection of Vanderbilt Way and Buckstone Drive, approximately 1,200 feet west of Collier Boulevard.
The property is in Section 34 Township 48 South, Range 26 East, in unincorporated Collier County. (See
location map on page 2).
PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
The Vanderbilt Commons PUD was originally established as the Carolina Village PUD under Ord. 05-19.
No amendments were made to the PUD until Ord. 17-47, when, among other items, the PUD name was
changed to Vanderbilt Commons.
A Site Development Plan (SDP-PL20190001947) for 48 multi-family units on Lots 5 and 6 of the PUD
was initially submitted on December 4, 2019, and approved on December 6, 2023. The site plan did not
include garages for the ground floor units as required by Ord. 19 -34. At the time the SDP was submitted,
the property was owned by Vanderbilt Way Apartments, LLC.
The property was purchased by the current owner, Vanderbilt 951 Apartments, LLC, on July 14, 2021.
Vanderbilt 951 Apartments, LLC constructed the 48 multi-family units pursuant to SDP-PL20190003366;
the ground-floor units were constructed without garages. The Final Site Acceptance Letter was issued by
the Collier County Development Review on December 6, 2023; a Certificate of Occupancy was issued on
February 2, 2024 (Attachment 2). The applicant wishes to remove the commitment that first floor units must
3.A.a
Packet Pg. 4 Attachment: Staff Report Vanderbilt Commons (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
PDI-PL20240007161, Vanderbilt Commons PUD Page 2 of 5
have garages for just Lots 5 and 6. This will bring the PUD document to match what has already been
approved and constructed.
LAND USE AND ZONING:
This section of the staff report
identifies the land uses and
zoning classifications for
properties near the portion of the
PUD affected by the request.
North: Wolf Creek PUD
(residential)
East: Buckstone Dr., then
Mission Hills PUD (commercial)
South: Vanderbilt Beach Road,
then Estates zoning (residential)
West: Wolf Creek PUD
(residential)
3.A.a
Packet Pg. 5 Attachment: Staff Report Vanderbilt Commons (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
PDI-PL20240007161, Vanderbilt Commons PUD Page 3 of 5
STAFF ANALYSIS: LDC Sections 10.02.13.E.1 and 10.02.13.E.2 set forth the criteria by which
insubstantial amendments to a PUD Master Plan and/or minor text changes to a PUD document are to be
reviewed before they can be approved. The criteria and a response to each have been listed as follows:
LDC Section 10.02.13.E.1:
a. Is there a proposed change in the boundary of the Planned Unit Development (PUD)?
No, there is no proposed change in the boundary of the PUD.
b. Is there a proposed increase in the total number of dwelling units, intensity of land use, or height
of buildings within the development?
No, there is no proposed increase in the number of dwelling units, intensity of land use, or height
of buildings within the development.
c. Is there a proposed decrease in preservation, conservation, recreation, or open space areas within
the development greater than 5% of the total acreage previously designated as such, or five acres
in area?
No, there is no proposed decrease in preservation, conservation, recreation, or open space areas
within the development as designated on the approved Master Plan.
d. Is there a proposed increase in the size of areas used for non-residential uses to include
institutional, commercial, and industrial land uses (excluding preservation, conservation, or open
space), or a proposed relocation of nonresidential land uses?
No, there is no proposed increase to the size of areas used for non-residential uses and no relocation
of non-residential areas.
e. Is there a substantial increase in the impacts of the development, which may include, but are
not limited to increases in traffic generation, changes in traffic circulation, or impacts on
other public facilities?
No, there are no substantial impacts resulting from this amendment.
f. Will the change result in land use activities that generate a higher level of vehicular traffic
based upon the Trip Generation Manual published by the Institute of Transportation
Engineers?
No additional traffic will be generated from this amendment.
g. Will the change result in a requirement for increased stormwater retention or otherwise
increase stormwater discharge?
No, the proposed change is to the ordinance text and will not include any physical changes to the
subject property.
3.A.a
Packet Pg. 6 Attachment: Staff Report Vanderbilt Commons (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
PDI-PL20240007161, Vanderbilt Commons PUD Page 4 of 5
h. Will the proposed change bring about a relationship to an abutting land use that would be
incompatible with an adjacent land use?
No, the proposed change is to the ordinance text and will not include any physical changes to the
subject property; therefore, there will be no impacts to abutting landowners.
i. Are there any modifications to the PUD Master Plan or PUD Document or amendments to a
PUD ordinance, which is inconsistent with the Future Land Use Element or other elements
of the Growth Management Plan or which modification would increase the density of
intensity of the permitted land uses?
No. Comprehensive Planning staff determined that Ord. 05-19, the ordinance which approved the
PUD was consistent with the FLUE of the GMP. There will be no change in the density or intensity of
development and no change in the list of permitted uses.
j. The proposed change is to a PUD district designated as a development of regional impact
(DRI) and approved pursuant to F.S. § 380.06, where such change requires a determination
and public hearing by Collier County pursuant to F.S. § 380.06(19). Any change that meets
the criterion of F.S. §380.06(19)(e)2, and any changes to a DRI/PUD master plan that clearly
do not create a substantial deviation shall be reviewed and approved by Collier County
under this LDC section 10.02.13; or
This question is not applicable as the development does not rise to the level of a regional impact.
k. Any modification in the PUD master plan or PUD document or amendment to a PUD
ordinance which impact(s) any consideration deemed to be a substantial modification as
described under this LDC section 10.02.13.
No, there is no change to the master plan; there is only a textual change to the PUD document to reflect
actions that have already been approved and constructed.
LDC Section 10.02.13.E.2: Insubstantial change determination. An insubstantial change includes any
change that is not considered a substantial or minor change. An insubstantial change to an approved
PUD Ordinance shall be based upon an evaluation of LDC subsection 10.02.13 E.1
The petition is modifying the requirement for garages to be built for first floor units to reflect what has
previously been approved and built. As such, it is an insubstantial change and successfully meets the criteria
of LDC 10.02.13 E.1.
DEVIATION DISCUSSION:
The petitioner is not seeking any deviations.
NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM):
A NIM was held at 5:30 p.m. on August 27, 2024, at the Greater Naples Fire Station #73, located at 14575
Collier Boulevard. No members of the public attended in person or via Zoom.
3.A.a
Packet Pg. 7 Attachment: Staff Report Vanderbilt Commons (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
PDI-PL20240007161, Vanderbilt Commons PUD Page 5 of 5
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Collier County Hearing Examiner approve Petition PDI-PL20240007161.
Attachments:
1. Proposed Text Changes to Section 5.17.C of Ord. 19-34
2. SDP (PL-20190001947), Excerpts from Ord. 19—34, Vanderbilt 951 Apt. Deed
3. Applicant Backup Materials
4. Legal Ad and Sign Posting
3.A.a
Packet Pg. 8 Attachment: Staff Report Vanderbilt Commons (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
Attachment 1
Proposed Text Changes to Ord. No. 2019—34
3.A.b
Packet Pg. 9 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Proposed PUD Text Changes (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
Attachment 2 Site Development Plan (PL20190001947) (SDP does not include any garages.) Excerpts from Ord. 19-34 and Deed, Vanderbilt 951 Apartments, LLC 3.A.c
Packet Pg. 10 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Excerpts from Ord. 19-34 and SDP-PL20190001947 (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
Section 5.17 – Miscellaneous * * * * * * * * * * * * * C. In residential-only buildings, except on Lots 5 and 6, garages shall be provided for ground-floor units. 3.A.c
Packet Pg. 11 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Excerpts from Ord. 19-34 and SDP-PL20190001947 (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
ORDINANCE NO. 19 - 34
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO.
2005-19, AS AMENDED, THE VANDERBILT COMMONS PLANNED
UNIT DEVELOPMENT; BY REMOVING THE REQUIREMENT
THAT RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS BE LOCATED IN MIXED-
USE BUILDINGS WITH COMMERCIAL ON THE FIRST FLOOR
AND ALLOWING STAND-ALONE RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS; BY
REDUCING THE DENSITY TO 53 DWELLING UNITS; BY REVISING
THE MASTER PLAN; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE
SUBJECT PROPERTY, CONSISTING OF 14.49+/- ACRES, IS
LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD
AND APPROXIMATELY 1/4 MILE WEST OF COLLIER
BOULEVARD IN SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26
EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. [PL20180003366]
WHEREAS, on April 26, 2005, the Board of County Commissioners approved Ordinance
No. 2005-19, which established the Carolina Village Planned Unit Development (PUD); and
WHEREAS, on December 12, 2017, the Board of County Commissioners approved
Ordinance No. 17-47, which changed the name of the PUD to Vanderbilt Commons PUD among
other changes; and
WHEREAS, Lindsay F. Robin, MPA of Waldrop Engineering, P.A. and Jeffrey Wright
of Henderson, Franklin, Starnes and Holt, P.A. representing Vanderbilt Way Apartments, LLC,
petitioned the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, to amend Ordinance
2005-19, as amended.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that:
SECTION ONE: Amendments to the PUD Document attached as Exhibit A to Ordinance
Number 2005-19, as amended, now known as Vanderbilt Commons
Planned Unit Development.
The PUD Document attached as Exhibit A to Ordinance Number 2005-19, as amended,
now known as Vanderbilt Commons Planned Unit Development, is hereby amended and
replaced with the PUD Document attached hereto as Exhibit A.
19-CPS-01878/1497474/I] 104 Page 1 of 2
Vanderbilt Commons/PUDA-PL20180003366
9/12/19
3.A.c
Packet Pg. 12 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Excerpts from Ord. 19-34 and SDP-PL20190001947 (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
5.15 LIGHTING
Lighting provided at the rear of any building and structure adjacent to the Black Bear Ridge
Subdivision, for development on lots 5 and 6, (as shown on the Vanderbilt Commons Subdivision
Plat,recorded in Plat Book 60,Page 31 of the Public Records of Collier County)shall be in the form of
shielded structure mounted sconces.These shielded structures shall be placed no higher than 10-
feet measured from finished floor of the building or structure. The areas identified shall be free of
pole lighting".
5.16 ADDITIONAL SCREENING
Owner(s) shall construct a 6-foot wall at the rear of lots 5 and 6; abutting the Black Bear Ridge
Subdivision (as shown on the Vanderbilt Commons Subdivision Plat, recorded in Plat Book 60, Page
31 of the Public Records of Collier County). No wall will be located along Tract C,the Preserve Area.
MZ MISCELLANEOUS
A. Pursuant to Section 125.022(5) F.S., issuance of a development permit by a county does not in
any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal
agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the
applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal
agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law.
B, In residential-only buildings, dwelling units shall be rented for no less than 12-month periods.
C— In residential-only buildings,garages shall be provided for ground-floor units.
l2 In residential-only buildings, only two and three bedroom units shall be permitted. Two-bedroom
units shall be a minimum of 800 square feet, and three-bedroom units shall be a minimum of
1,200 square feet.
In residential-only buildings, no exterior balconies are permitted.
E. In residential-only buildings, ground-floor patios will be located on the south side of the building
Cz If all residential is built on Lots 5&6, the remaining unbuilt commercial square footage of the Vanderbilt
Commons MPUD would not be used beyond that which is permitted as of the effective date hereof, and
shall not exceed 175,000 square feet.
All other state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development.
Vanderbilt Commons MPUD—PL20180003366
Last Revised:August 15,2019 Struck through items have been deleted,Items Underlined have been added
Page 23 of 23
3.A.c
Packet Pg. 13 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Excerpts from Ord. 19-34 and SDP-PL20190001947 (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
December 06, 2023
Atwell Group
28100 Bonita Grande DR #305
Bonita Springs, FL 34135
Re:Final Site Acceptance Letter
Project Number: PL20190001947
Project Name: Vanderbilt Way Apartments (SDP)
Dear Applicant:
Development Review Staff has reviewed the final certifications and record drawings for
this project;conducted an onsite inspection on 11/29/2023;and determined your
project’s final acceptance as it is in substantial conformance with approved plans,
permits, and specifications.
As the Engineer of Record,you are obligated to familiarize the owner with the operation
of the infrastructure components of the site.The owner is responsible for site
maintenance.
If you should have any questions or if we may be of assistance,please advise us at 239-
252-2417.
Sincerely,
Development Review Division
Growth Management Department
2800 N. Horseshoe Dr.
Naples, Florida 34104
239-252-2400
3.A.c
Packet Pg. 14 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Excerpts from Ord. 19-34 and SDP-PL20190001947 (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
3.A.cPacket Pg. 15Attachment: Attachment 2 - Excerpts from Ord. 19-34 and SDP-PL20190001947 (29844 : PL20240007161 –
3.A.cPacket Pg. 16Attachment: Attachment 2 - Excerpts from Ord. 19-34 and SDP-PL20190001947 (29844 : PL20240007161 –
TRACT A - VANDERBILT WAY R.O.W / A.E. / P.U.E. / D.E. / C.U.E.
RPUD
WOLF CREEK
(PRESERVE)
TRACT C (PRESERVE AREA, C.E.)
LOT #6LOT #5
TRACT B
(WATER
MANAGEMENT)
LOT #4
LOT #1 LOT #2 LOT #3
LIFT
STATION
LOCATION
VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD (RIGHT-OF-WAY)PRISTINE DRIVE (RIGHT-OF-WAY)BUCKSTONE DRIVE (RIGHT-OF-WAY)PUD
MISSION HILLS
TRACT 1
(COMMERCIAL)
PUD
MISSION HILLS
TRACT 5
(COMMERCIAL)
RPUD
WOLF CREEK
(RESIDENTIAL)
RPUD
WOLF CREEK
(RESIDENTIAL)
20' TYPE D LANDSCAPE BUFFER 20' TYPE D LANDSCAPEBUFFER10' TYPE D LANDSCAPE
BUFFER 20' TYPE D LANDSCAPE BUFFER10' TYPE D LANDSCAPE
BUFFER
10' TYPE A LANDSCAPE
BUFFER
10' TYPE A LANDSCAPE
BUFFER
10' TYPE D LANDSCAPE
BUFFER
10' TYPE D LANDSCAPE
BUFFER
20' TYPE D LANDSCAPE BUFFER20' TYPE D LANDSCAPE BUFFER6 FOOT HIGH WALL
10' TYPE A LANDSCAPE
BUFFER
4 FOOT HIGH WALL
4 FOOT HIGH WALL20' TYPE D LANDSCAPE BUFFERB:\Projects\949-001 (Studio+) Vanderbilt Way Apartments - Planning\Drawings-Exhibits\949-001-01 MCP\Current Plans\9490010101.dwgDEVIATIONS
DEVIATION FROM LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE (LDC) SECTION 5.06.04.G TO ALLOW ONE
DOUBLE-FACED OFF-PREMISES SIGN WITH A MAXIMUM OF 8 FEET IN HEIGHT AND 32 SQUARE FEET
IN AREA, LOCATED IN THE ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY (LABELED PRISTINE DRIVE ON EXHIBIT "A"). THE
SIGN WILL BE LIMITED TO NO MORE THAN 3 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN THE ABUTTING
WOLF CREEK PUD. THE PROPOSED SIGN MUST MEET ALL VEHICULAR SAFETY SIGHT DISTANCES
STANDARDS FOR COLLIER COUNTY AND HAVE A MINIMUM 10-FOOT SETBACK FROM VANDERBILT
BEACH ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY. THE PROPOSED SIGN MUST BE EXTERNALLY ILLUMINATED ONLY.
ONCE PRISTINE DRIVE IS ACCEPTED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AS A PUBLIC
ROAD, ANY STRUCTURAL CHANGES TO THE SIGN SHALL REQUIRE A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT. THE
SIGNAGE SHALL BE PERPETUALLY MAINTAINED BY THE THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATIONS OF THE
DEVELOPMENTS NAMED ON THE SIGN. THE COUNTY AT THE TIME AFTER THE ROAD BECOMES
PUBLIC MAY REQUIRE THE SIGN TO BE RELOCATED FOR ROAD EXPANSION OR TO ADDRESS
CAPACITY OR SAFETY ISSUES.
DEVIATION FROM LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE (LDC) SECTION 5.03.02 H.1.b, WHICH REQUIRES A
WALL IF LOCATED ON A PROPERTY OPPOSITE A RESIDENTIALLY ZONED DISTRICT BUT FRONTING
ON A LOCAL STREET OR ROADWAY, OR THE PROPERTIES ARE SEPARATED BY A PLATTED ALLEY,
THEN HEIGHT SHALL BE 4 FEET AND PLACEMENT SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 3 FEET FROM THE REAR
OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY LANDSCAPE BUFFER LINE, TO INSTEAD REMOVE THE REQUIREMENT TO
PLACE A WALL ALONG VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD.
DEVIATION FROM LDC SECTION 4.06.05.C. “BUILDING FOUNDATION PLANTING REQUIREMENTS”,
WHICH REQUIRES BUILDING FOUNDATION PLANTING BEDS FOR BUILDING FOOTPRINTS OVER
10,000 SQUARE FEET TO BE A MINIMUM WIDTH OF 10-FEET, TO ALLOW THE MINIMUM WIDTH OF THE
PLANTING BEDS TO BE 8-FEET. THE APPLICANT WILL PROVIDE AN ADDITIONAL FIVE (5) SOLITAIRE
PALMS PLANTED WITH 10-FOOT CLEAR TRUNK TO SUPPLEMENT THE AREA OF FOUNDATION
PLANTINGS AND NUMBER OF TREES REQUIRED BY LDC SECTION 4.06.05.C. THIS DEVIATION SHALL
ONLY APPLY TO LOTS 5 AND 6 OF THE MPUD.
1
2
MPUD SUMMARY
THE VANDERBILT COMMONS MIXED USE PUD IS A PROJECT COMPRISED OF
14.49 ACRES DESIGNATED FOR COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL LAND USES
AND THE COMMERCIAL USES ARE LIMITED TO A MAXIMUM OF 200,000 SQUARE
FEET OF GROSS LEASABLE AREA AND THE RESIDENTIAL LAND USES ARE LIMITED
TO A MAXIMUM OF 58 DWELLING UNITS. ALL RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS SHALL
BE LOCATED IN MIXED-USE BUILDINGS WITH COMMERCIAL USES SITUATED ON AT
LEAST THE FIRST FLOOR. COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL LAND USES AND
SIGNAGE ARE DESIGNED TO BE HARMONIOUS WITH ONE ANOTHER IN A NATURAL
SETTING BY USING COMMON ARCHITECTURE, QUALITY SCREENING/
BUFFERING AND NATIVE VEGETATION.
ACCESS TO ALL PARCELS, WITHIN THE VANDERBILT COMMONS SUBDIVISION PLAT,
RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 60, PAGE 31 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER
COUNTY, OR AS AMENDED, SHALL BE FROM VANDERBILT WAY.
MPUD LAND USE SUMMARY
USE
WATER MANAGEMENT (TRACT B)
PRESERVE AREA (TRACT C)
LANDSCAPE BUFFERS
UTILITY EASEMENT/ VANDERBILT WAY R.O.W.
DEVELOPABLE AREA (LOTS 1-6)
TOTAL SITE AREA
ACRES
+/- 1.28 AC
+/- 0.18 AC
+/- 1.44 AC
+/- 1.71 AC
+/- 9.88 AC
+/- 14.49 AC
SET NUMBER:
SHEET :1
949-001-01PLAN REVISIONSFLORIDA CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION #8636WALDROPENGINEERINGLAND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS28100 BONITA GRANDE DRIVE - SUITE 305 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135VANDERBILT COMMONSMPUDCLIENT: VANDERBILT WAY APARTMENTS, LLCPUD MASTER PLANREVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS06/14/19213
1 2 2
3 3
0
SCALE IN FEET
100 200 400REVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS04/17/193.A.c
Packet Pg. 17 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Excerpts from Ord. 19-34 and SDP-PL20190001947 (29844 : PL20240007161 –
REF.REF.A B
C
UP
REF.REF.REF.REF.REF.REF.REF.REF.REF.AREA AAREA BAREA AAREA B39'-3 1/2" 9'-8 3/8" 12'-11 5/8" 21'-9 3/8" 12'-11 5/8"20'-11 3/8" 12'-11 5/8" 21'-9 3/8" 12'-11 5/8" 20'-11 3/8" 12'-11 5/8" 21'-9 3/8" 12'-11 5/8" 9'-8 3/8" 39'-3 3/8"
283'-0 1/8"27'-7"9'-9 3/4"8'-2 1/2"9'-9 3/4"27'-6"82'-11"3 BED UNIT
102
ADA 2 BED UNIT
104 2 BED UNIT
106
2 BED UNIT
108
2 BED UNIT
110
2 BED UNIT
112
ADA 2 BED UNIT
114
2 BED UNIT
116
ADA 3 BED UNIT
115ADA 2 BED UNIT
113
2 BED UNIT
111
2 BED UNIT
109
2 BED UNIT
107
2 BED UNIT
105
ADA 2 BED UNIT
103
3 BED UNIT
101
CORRIDOR
1000
ELEC. #1
1002
STAIR #1
S-1-1
ELEVATOR
E-1
STAIR #2
S-2-1
TRASH CHUTE
1001
A-201-SDP3
A-201-SDP
1
A-201-SDP
2
BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE - PER FBC CALC METHOD
SQUARE FOOTAGEDESCRIPTION
1ST FLOOR
SUPPORT AREAS
RESIDENTIAL UNITS
COVERED ENTRIES
ELEVATOR / STAIRS
2,349 SF
17,175 SF
123 SF
433 SF
1ST FLOOR TOTAL
2ND FLOOR
SUPPORT AREAS
RESIDENTIAL UNITS
3RD FLOOR
SUPPORT AREAS
RESIDENTIAL UNITS
2ND FLOOR TOTAL
3RD FLOOR TOTAL
TOTAL AREA UNDER ROOF
AREA, BUILDING .
THE AREA INCLUDED WITHIN SURROUNDING EXTERIOR WALLS (OR EXTERIOR WALLS AND FIRE WALLS) EXCLUSIVE OF VENT SHAFTS AND COURTS. AREAS OF THE BUILDING
NOT PROVIDED WITH SURROUNDING WALLS SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE BUILDING AREA IF SUCH AREAS ARE INCLUDED WITHIN THE HORIZONTAL PROJECTION OF THE ROOF
OR FLOOR ABOVE.
20,080 SF
2,254 SF
17,319 SF
20,006 SF
2,254 SF
17,319 SF
20,006 SF
60,092 SF
CALIFORNIA | FLORIDA
ISSUED DATE:
PROJECT NUMBER:
12271 TOWNE LAKE DRIVE, FT. MYERS, FL 33913
P: 239.357.4983 AA26002372
REVISIONS:
PROJECT ADDRESS:
SHEET TITLE:
PROJECT TITLE:
c Studio+ 2019
DATE:
TRUE NORTH
WALDROP ENGINEERING
CIVIL/PLANNING/ LANDSCAPE
28100 BONITA GRANDE DR #305
BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135
P:(239) 405-7777
LICENSE#: LC26000385
SELECT STRUCTURAL
STRUCTURAL
12573 NEW BRITTANY BLVD
FORT MYERS, FL 33907
P:(239) 244-1242
LICENSE#: CA 28357
BURGESS BRANT, CONSULTING ENGINEERS
MPFE
12995 SOUTH CLEVELAND AVENUE
SUITE 229
FORT MYERS, FL 33907
P:(239) 274-0020
LICENSE#: 6032
BA
KEY PLAN
ARCHITECT OF RECORD:
CARLOS ARTURO MARCET, AIA, ACHA,
LEED AP
AR0009477
05.08.2020
A-101-SDP
FIRST FLOOR OVERALL
PLAN
RCAM HOLDINGS LLC
VANDERBILT WAY
APARTMENT BUILDING
FL 18050
05.08.2020
7245 & 7265 VANDERBILT WAY F/K/A
CAROLINA WAY
COLLIER COUNTY
NAPLES, FL 34119
GENERAL NOTES
1 ALL DOCUMENTS AND DRAWINGS INCLUDED HEREWITH ARE INTENDED TO BE IN
CONFORMANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND BUILDING REGULATIONS HAVING
JURISDICTION OVER THIS TYPE OF FACILITY AND OCCUPANCY. IF A CONFLICT BETWEEN
SUCH REQUIREMENTS OCCUR, THE MOST STRINGENT WILL GOVERN.
2 GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO FIELD VERIFY AND DOCUMENT ALL
EXISTING FIELD CONDITIONS. ANY DEVIATIONS FROM THE EXISTING CONDITION
DRAWINGS WILL BE ADDRESSED IMMEDIATELY WITH THE ARCHITECT.
3 PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY WORK THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO
VERIFY THE LOCATION OF ALL UTILITY POINTS OF CONNECTION.
4 ALL SMOKE AND FIRE RATED WALLS WILL BE LABELED ABOVE THE CEILING FINISH WITH
RED, PAINTED STENCILED LETTERING IDENTIFYING THE WALL RATING AND STATING
"PROTECT ALL PENETRATIONS." STENCILED LABELING WILL OCCUR ON BOTH SIDES OF
EACH SMOKE AND FIRE RATED WALL AT NOT MORE THAN 20 FEET ON CENTER AND ALL
WALL TERMINATIONS OR CHANGES IN DIRECTION WILL BE DESIGNATED WITH A VERTICAL
LINE.
5 SHOP DRAWINGS AND / OR SUBMITTALS FOR PRODUCTS, MATERIALS, ASSEMBLIES, AND
SYSTEMS SPECIFIED IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS WILL BE SUBMITTED BY THE
GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO FABRICATION IN ORDER TO
VERIFY GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. SHOP DRAWINGS
AND SUBMITTALS MUST BEAR A REVIEW STAMP FROM THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR
PRIOR TO BEING SUBMITTED TO THE ARCHITECT. SHOP DRAWING REVIEW WILL NOT
RELIEVE ANY PARTY FROM MAINTAINING COMPLIANCE WITH THE CONTRACT
DOCUMENTS.
6 DETAILS MARKED AS 'TYP' OR 'TYPICAL' WILL APPLY IN ALL CASES UNLESS OTHERWISE
NOTED.
7 ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TAKEN FROM GRID LINES OR FINISHED FACE OF WALL / PARTITION
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
8 WALL FINISHES SHALL MEET CLASS C REQUIREMENTS WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH ASTM E84. PER FFPMC NFPA 101; SECTION 38.3.3.2.
10 CONSTRUCTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH FBC CHAPTER 33 SAFE GUARDS DURING
CONSTRUCTION.
3/32" = 1'-0"
1FIRST FLOOR OVERALL PLAN
BUILDING INFORMATION
STRAP SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 48S, RANGE 26E -
COLLIER COUNTY, NAPLES, FLORIDA
STRAP NUMBER 683220 53834
WIND ZONE 160 MPH
PLANNING ZONE CPUD
FLOOD ZONE X
FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION 16.50 NAVD
CONSTRUCTION TYPE TYPE IIB (FBC), TYPE II (000) FPPC
AUTOMATIC SPRINKLERS YES
NUMBER OF STORIES 3-STORIES
GROSS AREA REFER TO BUILDING AREA CALCULATIONS
OCCUPANCY TYPE/USE (FBC CH 3) RESIDENTIAL: R-2
SCOPE OF WORK - TOTAL GROSS AREA REFER TO SCOPE AND CODE ANALYSIS
SHEET FOR SCOPE OF WORK
PROPOSED FUNCTION OF SPACE (FBC
TABLE 1004.1.2)
RESIDENTIAL (200 GROSS)
NO DESCRIPTION DATE
3.A.c
Packet Pg. 18 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Excerpts from Ord. 19-34 and SDP-PL20190001947 (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
3.A.c
Packet Pg. 19 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Excerpts from Ord. 19-34 and SDP-PL20190001947 (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
3.A.c
Packet Pg. 20 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Excerpts from Ord. 19-34 and SDP-PL20190001947 (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
3.A.d
Packet Pg. 21 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Applicant Backup (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
3.A.d
Packet Pg. 22 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Applicant Backup (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
3.A.d
Packet Pg. 23 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Applicant Backup (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
3.A.d
Packet Pg. 24 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Applicant Backup (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
3.A.d
Packet Pg. 25 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Applicant Backup (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
3.A.d
Packet Pg. 26 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Applicant Backup (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
3.A.d
Packet Pg. 27 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Applicant Backup (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
3.A.d
Packet Pg. 28 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Applicant Backup (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
3.A.d
Packet Pg. 29 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Applicant Backup (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
3.A.d
Packet Pg. 30 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Applicant Backup (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
3.A.d
Packet Pg. 31 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Applicant Backup (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
3.A.d
Packet Pg. 32 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Applicant Backup (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
3.A.d
Packet Pg. 33 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Applicant Backup (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
3.A.d
Packet Pg. 34 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Applicant Backup (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
3.A.d
Packet Pg. 35 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Applicant Backup (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
3.A.d
Packet Pg. 36 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Applicant Backup (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
3.A.d
Packet Pg. 37 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Applicant Backup (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
3.A.d
Packet Pg. 38 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Applicant Backup (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
3.A.d
Packet Pg. 39 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Applicant Backup (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
3.A.d
Packet Pg. 40 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Applicant Backup (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
3.A.d
Packet Pg. 41 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Applicant Backup (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
3.A.d
Packet Pg. 42 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Applicant Backup (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
3.A.d
Packet Pg. 43 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Applicant Backup (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
3.A.d
Packet Pg. 44 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Applicant Backup (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
3.A.d
Packet Pg. 45 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Applicant Backup (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
3.A.d
Packet Pg. 46 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Applicant Backup (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
3.A.d
Packet Pg. 47 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Applicant Backup (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
3.A.d
Packet Pg. 48 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Applicant Backup (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
3.A.d
Packet Pg. 49 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Applicant Backup (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
3.A.d
Packet Pg. 50 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Applicant Backup (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
3.A.d
Packet Pg. 51 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Applicant Backup (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
3.A.d
Packet Pg. 52 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Applicant Backup (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
3.A.d
Packet Pg. 53 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Applicant Backup (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
3.A.d
Packet Pg. 54 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Applicant Backup (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
3.A.d
Packet Pg. 55 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Applicant Backup (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
3.A.d
Packet Pg. 56 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Applicant Backup (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
3.A.d
Packet Pg. 57 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Applicant Backup (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
3.A.d
Packet Pg. 58 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Applicant Backup (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
3.A.d
Packet Pg. 59 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Applicant Backup (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
3.A.d
Packet Pg. 60 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Applicant Backup (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
3.A.d
Packet Pg. 61 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Applicant Backup (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
3.A.d
Packet Pg. 62 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Applicant Backup (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
3.A.dPacket Pg. 63Attachment: Attachment 3 - Applicant Backup (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
3.A.d
Packet Pg. 64 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Applicant Backup (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
3.A.d
Packet Pg. 65 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Applicant Backup (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
3.A.d
Packet Pg. 66 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Applicant Backup (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
3.A.d
Packet Pg. 67 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Applicant Backup (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
3.A.d
Packet Pg. 68 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Applicant Backup (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
3.A.d
Packet Pg. 69 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Applicant Backup (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
3.A.d
Packet Pg. 70 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Applicant Backup (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
3.A.d
Packet Pg. 71 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Applicant Backup (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
3.A.d
Packet Pg. 72 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Applicant Backup (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
3.A.d
Packet Pg. 73 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Applicant Backup (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
3.A.d
Packet Pg. 74 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Applicant Backup (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
3.A.d
Packet Pg. 75 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Applicant Backup (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
3.A.d
Packet Pg. 76 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Applicant Backup (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
3.A.d
Packet Pg. 77 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Applicant Backup (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
3.A.d
Packet Pg. 78 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Applicant Backup (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
Attachment 4 Legal Ad Sign Posting 3.A.e
Packet Pg. 79 Attachment: Attachment 4 Legal Ad Sign Posting (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
Naples Daily News - 09/06/2024 Page : A13
September 6, 2024 2:51 pm (GMT -4:00) Powered by TECNAVIA
+NAPLESNEWS.COM | FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 6, 2024 |13A
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Hearing Examiner
(HEX) at 1:00 P.M., September 26, 2024, in the Hearing Examiner’s Meeting Room, at 2800 North
Horseshoe Drive, Room 609/610, Naples |FL 34104, to consider:
PETITION NO. PDI-PL20240007161- REQUEST FOR AN INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE
TO ORDINANCE NO. 2019-34, THE VANDERBILT COMMONS PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT (PUD), TO AMEND SECTION 5.17.C SO THAT THE SECTION NO LONGER
APPLIES TO LOTS 5 AND 6. THE VANDERBILT COMMONS PUD WAS ORIGINALLY
ESTABLISHED AS THE CAROLINA VILLAGE PUD UNDER ORDINANCE NO. 2005-19, AS
AMENDED. THE PUD NAME WAS CHANGED TO THE VANDERBILT COMMONS PUD BY
ORDINANCE NO. 2017-47, AS AMENDED. THE ±2.51-ACRE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS
WITHIN THE ±14.49-ACRE PUD AND LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUADRANT
OF THE INTERSECTION OF VANDERBILT 8": AND BUCKSTONE DRIVE IN
SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA.
All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. All materials used in presentation before the Hearing
Examiner will become a permanent part of the record.
Copies of staff report are available one (1) week prior to the hearing. The file can be reviewed at the Collier
County Growth Management Community Development Department, Zoning Division, 2800 North Horseshoe
Drive, Naples, FL 34104.
As to any petition upon which the Hearing Examiner takes action, an aggrieved petitioner may appeal such
final action. Such appeal shall be filed per Section 2-88 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances
within 30 days of the decision by the Hearing Examiner. An aggrieved non-party may appeal a decision by the
Hearing Examiner to the Circuit Court of Collier County within 30 days of the decision. In the event that the
petition has been approved by the Hearing Examiner, the applicant shall be advised that he/she proceeds with
construction at his/her own risk during this 30-day period. Any construction work completed ahead of the
approval authorization shall be at their own risk.
As part of an ongoing initiative to encourage public involvement, the public will have the opportunity to
provide public comments remotely, as well as in person, during this proceeding. Individuals who would
like to participate remotely should register through the link provided within the specific event/meeting
entry on the Calendar of Events on the County website at www.colliercountyfl.gov/our-county/visitors/
calendar-of-events after the agenda is posted on the County website. Registration should be done in
advance of the public meeting, or any deadline specified within the public meeting notice. Individuals who
register will receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how they can participate remotely
in this meeting. Remote participation is provided as a courtesy and is at the user’s risk. The County is not
responsible for technical issues. For additional information about the meeting, please call Ray Bellows at
252-2463 or email to Ray. Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov.
If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding,
you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County
Zoning Division located at 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr, Naples, Florida 34104, (239) 252- 2400, at least two (2)
days prior to the meeting.
Andrew W. J. Dickman, Esq., AICP Chief Hearing Examiner
Collier County, Florida ND-40166771
Ambros ia
LNIslandwalk CIRMission Hills DR
Acorn WAY
Collier BLVDAnguilla
WAY
Acorn
WAY
BuckstoneDRVander bil t Beach RD SonomaOaksDRVanderbilt
WAY
7 th AVE NW
!I
Project
Location
ND-40166784
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Hearing Examiner (HEX) at
1:00 P.M., September 26, 2024, in the Hearing Examiner’s Meeting Room, at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive,
Room 609/610, Naples FL 34104, to consider:
PETITION NO. SV-PL20240007875 – REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE
SECTION 5.06.04.F.9 WHICH REQUIRES “ON PREMISES DIRECTIONAL SIGNS” LOCATED INTERNAL
TO THE SUBDIVISION OR DEVELOPMENT SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM SETBACK OF 10 FEET FROM
THE PROPERTY LINE, TO INSTEAD ALLOW FOR DIRECTIONAL SIGNS FOR PUBLIC PARKING FOR
COMMERCIAL USES LOCATED IN THE ONE NAPLES MPUD MU TRACT 1, ALONG SOUTHBAY DRIVE
NORTH OF VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD AND EAST OF GULF SHORE DRIVE, TO BE LOCATED A MINIMUM
OF 5 FEET FROM THE PROPERTY LINE IN SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA. Vanderbilt DRPalm
CT
91 s t
AVE N
92 nd
AVE N
9 3 rd
AVE NGulf Shore DRVanderbilt
B
e
a
c
h
R
D
Southbay
DR
RitzCarltonDR!I
Project
Location
All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. All materials used in presentation before the
Hearing Examiner will become a permanent part of the record.
Copies of staff report are available one (1) week prior to the hearing. The file can be reviewed at the Collier
County Growth Management Community Development Department, Zoning Division, 2800 North Horseshoe
Drive, Naples, FL 34104.
As to any petition upon which the Hearing Examiner takes action, an aggrieved petitioner may appeal such
final action. Such appeal shall be filed per Section 2-88 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances
within 30 days of the decision by the Hearing Examiner. An aggrieved non-party may appeal a decision by
the Hearing Examiner to the Circuit Court of Collier County within 30 days of the decision. In the event that
the petition has been approved by the Hearing Examiner, the applicant shall be advised that he/she proceeds
with construction at his/her own risk during this 30-day period. Any construction work completed ahead of
the approval authorization shall be at their own risk.
As part of an ongoing initiative to encourage public involvement, the public will have the opportunity to
provide public comments remotely, as well as in person, during this proceeding. Individuals who would like
to participate remotely should register through the link provided within the specific event/meeting entry on
the Calendar of Events on the County website at www.colliercountyfl.gov/our-county/visitors/calendar-of-
events after the agenda is posted on the County website. Registration should be done in advance of the
public meeting, or any deadline specified within the public meeting notice. Individuals who register will
receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how they can participate remotely in this meeting.
Remote participation is provided as a courtesy and is at the user’s risk. The County is not responsible for
technical issues. For additional information about the meeting, please call Ray Bellows at 252-2463 or email
to Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov.
If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding,
you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County
Zoning Division located at 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr, Naples, Florida 34104, (239) 252- 2400, at least two (2)
days prior to the meeting.
Andrew W. J. Dickman, Esq., AICP
Chief Hearing Examiner
Collier County, Florida
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGNotice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Hearing Examiner (HEX) at 1:00 P.M., September 26, 2024, in the Hearing Examiner’s Meeting Room, at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Room 609/610, Naples FL 34104, to consider:PETITION NO. PDI PL20240004116 – NAPLES PRESERVE VILLAS, LLC REQUESTS AN INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO THE ONYX RPUD, ORDINANCE 16-24 FOR (1), THE MODIFICATION TO EXHIBIT B TABLE 1 – RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TO ADD INTERNAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR A PLATTED TOWNHOUSE DEVELOPMENT; AND (2) A DEVIATION FROM LDC 4.07.02.G.1, OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS, WHICH REQUIRES RESIDENTIAL PUD DISTRICTS TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 60% USEABLE OPEN SPACE TO ALLOW 40% USEABLE OPEN SPACE. THE SUBJECT 8.72 +/- ACRE PARCEL IS LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF SANTA BARBARA BOULEVARD APPROXIMATELY ONE-HALF MILE NORTH OF RATTLESNAKE-HAMMOCK ROAD IN SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. All materials used in presentation before the Hearing Examiner will become a permanent part of the record.Copies of staff report are available one (1) week prior to the hearing. The file can be reviewed at the Collier County Growth Management Community Development Department, Zoning Division, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL 34104.As to any petition upon which the Hearing Examiner takes action, an aggrieved petitioner may appeal such final action. Such appeal shall be filed per Section 2-88 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances within 30 days of the decision by the Hearing Examiner. An aggrieved non-party may appeal a decision by the Hearing Examiner to the Circuit Court of Collier County within 30 days of the decision. In the event that the petition has been approved by the Hearing Examiner, the applicant shall be advised that he/she proceeds with construction at his/her own risk during this 30-day period. Any construction work completed ahead of the approval authorization shall be at their own risk.As part of an ongoing initiative to encourage public involvement, the public will have the opportunity to provide public comments remotely, as well as in person, during this proceeding. Individuals who would like to participate remotely should register through the link provided within the specific event/meeting entry on the Calendar of Events on the County website at www.colliercountyfl.gov/our-county/visitors/calendar-of-events after the agenda is posted on the County website. Registration should be done in advance of the public meeting, or any deadline specified within the public meeting notice. Individuals who register will receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how they can participate remotely in this meeting. Remote participation is provided as a courtesy and is at the user’s risk. The County is not responsible for technical issues. For additional information about the meeting, please call Ray Bellows at 252-2463 or email to Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov.If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Zoning Division located at 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr, Naples, Florida 34104, (239) 252- 2400, at least two (2) days prior to the meeting.Andrew W. J. Dickman, Esq., AICP
Chief Hearing Examiner
Collier County, Florida Santa Barbara BLVDAdkins AVE Sunset BLVDCo bbl e s t on e LN RoyalWoodBLVDPolly AVEAmherstDROnyxCIRAdkins AVEEverett ST !IProjectLocationPARIS – French President Emman-uel Macron appointed Michel Barnier,the EU’s former Brexit negotiator, as hisnew prime minister on Thursday, task-ing him with unifying France and end-ing the political paralysis that followedan inconclusive snap election.The discreet, conservative politicianwill have the daunting challenge of try-ing to push reforms, and the 2025 bud-get, through a bitterly divided Parlia-ment, under the constant threat of avote of no confidence.At 73, Barnier is the oldest primeminister in France’s modern politicalhistory, taking over from Gabriel Attal,who was the youngest. It took Macrontwo months to appoint him, after theelection failed to yield a clear majority.The left – which placed first in theelection but without an absolute major-ity – made clear it would be a staunchopponent.“The election was stolen from theFrench people,” hard-left leader Jean-Luc Melenchon said, calling for streetprotests on Saturday. Another hard-leftlawmaker, Mathilde Panot, called it an“unacceptable democratic coup.”Much will depend on the far-rightNational Rally, Parliament’s biggestsingle party, which indicated it wouldnot block Barnier for now, but could doso later if demands were not met.“We will plead for the major emer-gencies of the French – the cost of liv-ing, security, immigration – to finally beaddressed, and we reserve all politicalmeans of action if this is not the case inthe coming weeks,” National Rally lead-er Jordan Bardella said.Barnier is a staunch pro-Europeanand a moderate career politician,though he toughened his discourseconsiderably during a failed 2021 bid tobecome his conservative party’s presi-dential nominee, saying immigrationwas out of control.Barnier first became a lawmaker atage 27, and held roles in several Frenchgovernments, including foreign minis-ter and agriculture minister, though hehas been out of political office in Francefor 15 years, spending most of that timeat EU headquarters in Brussels.He is best known abroad for havingled the EU’s talks with Britain over itsexit from the bloc.Macron had considered a string ofpotential prime ministers in recentweeks, none of whom musteredenough support to guarantee a stablegovernment.French bank sharesedged up, governmentborrowing costs fellslightly, and the euronudged higher, in posi-tive signs from financialmarkets following theappointment.Barnier’s politicalviews are overall close to Macron’s, andit was crucial for the French presidentthat his new prime minister not try toundo reforms pushed through over thepast years, in particular pensionchanges that angered the left.It remains unclear if Barnier willfully try to implement Macron’s politi-cal agenda or bring in new proposals.He will need in any case to negotiatewith other parties to get legislationadopted in Parliament.As Macron’s hunt for a prime minis-ter dragged on, public finances deterio-rated, and outgoing Finance MinisterBruno Le Maire has said that tens of bil-lions of euros in budget cuts are neededto plug the hole.Macron’s gamble to call the snapparliamentary election backfired, withhis centrist coalition losing dozens ofseats and no party winning an absolutemajority. Voters did, however, rally todeny the National Rally a victory.National Rally lawmaker Laurent Ja-cobelli said a condition for not oustingBarnier would be that Parliament bedissolved as soon as possible – whichwould be next July. Macron names Brexitnegotiator new PMDivided Parliament a challenge for Barnier Elizabeth Pineau and Ingrid MelanderREUTERSBarnier
3.A.e
Packet Pg. 80 Attachment: Attachment 4 Legal Ad Sign Posting (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
3.A.ePacket Pg. 81Attachment: Attachment 4 Legal Ad Sign Posting (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
3.A.e
Packet Pg. 82 Attachment: Attachment 4 Legal Ad Sign Posting (29844 : PL20240007161 – Vanderbilt Commons PDI)
09/26/2024
COLLIER COUNTY
Collier County Hearing Examiner
Item Number: 3.B
Doc ID: 29788
Item Summary: Petition No. PDI-PL20240004116 – Naples Preserve Villas, LLC - Santa Barbara Boulevard,
approximately one-half mile north of Rattlesnake-Hammock Road - Requests an insubstantial change to the Onyx
RPUD, Ordinance 16-24 for (1), the modification to Exhibit B Table 1 – Residential Development Standards to add
internal development standards for a platted townhouse development; and (2) a deviation from LDC 4.07.02.G.1,
Open Space Requirements, which requires Residential PUD districts to provide a minimum of 60% useable open
space to allow 40% useable open space. The subject 8.72 +/- acre parcel is located on the east side of Santa Barbara
Boulevard, approximately one-half mile north of Rattlesnake-Hammock Road in Section 16, Township 50 South,
Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Timothy Finn, Planner III] (Commissioner District 1)
Meeting Date: 09/26/2024
Prepared by:
Title: – Zoning
Name: Tim Finn
08/28/2024 3:31 PM
Submitted by:
Title: Zoning Director – Zoning
Name: Mike Bosi
08/28/2024 3:31 PM
Approved By:
Review:
Hearing Examiner (GMD Approvers) Diane Lynch Review Item Completed 09/16/2024 3:03 PM
Transportation Management Operations Support Evelyn Trimino GMCDD Reviewer Completed
09/17/2024 10:52 AM
Zoning Ray Bellows Review Item Completed 09/17/2024 12:35 PM
Unknown Jaime Cook GMCDD Reviewer Completed 09/18/2024 11:09 AM
Zoning Mike Bosi Review Item Completed 09/18/2024 2:15 PM
Hearing Examiner Andrew Dickman Meeting Pending 09/26/2024 1:00 PM
3.B
Packet Pg. 83
PDI-PL20240004116, Onyx Last revised: 9/12/24 Page 1 of 9
Hearing Examiner (HEX) Date: 9/26/24
STAFF REPORT
TO: COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER
FROM: ZONING DIVISION – ZONING SERVICES SECTION
GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
HEARING DATE: SEPTEMBER 26, 2024
SUBJECT: PDI-PL20240004116, ONYX
PROPERTY OWNER/APPLICANT/AGENT:
Property Owner/Applicant: Agent:
Naples Preserve Villas, LLC Margaret Emblidge, AICP
2385 NW Executive Center Dr., #370 LJA Engineering, Inc.
Boca Raton, FL 33431 7400 Trail Boulevard, Ste. 200
Naples, FL 34108
REQUESTED ACTION:
The applicant requests that the Hearing Examiner consider an insubstantial change to the Onyx RPUD,
Ordinance 16-24 for (1) the modification to Exhibit B Table 1 – Residential Development Standards to
add development standards for platted townhouses and (2) a deviation from LDC 4.07.02.G.1, Open
Space Requirements, which requires Residential PUD districts to provide a minimum of 60% useable
open space to allow 40% useable open space.
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION:
The subject 8.72 +/- acre parcel is located on the east side of Santa Barbara Boulevard, approximately
one-half mile north of Rattlesnake-Hammock Road in Section 16, Township 50 South, Range 26 East,
Collier County, Florida (See Location Map on the following page.)
3.B.a
Packet Pg. 84 Attachment: Staff Report - Onyx PDI [Revision 2] (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
PDI-PL20240004116, Onyx Last revised: 9/12/24 Page 2 of 9
Hearing Examiner (HEX) Date: 9/26/24
3.B.aPacket Pg. 85Attachment: Staff Report - Onyx PDI [Revision 2] (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
PDI-PL20240004116, Onyx Last revised: 9/12/24 Page 3 of 9
Hearing Examiner (HEX) Date: 9/26/24
PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
In 2016, the subject property was rezoned from the Residential RMF-6 Zoning District to a Residential
Planned Unit Development (RPUD) to allow development of up to 48 single family and/or multi-family
dwelling units.
In June 2024, the applicant applied for an insubstantial change to the Onyx RPUD, Ordinance 16-24
for (1) the modification to Exhibit B Table 1 – Residential Development Standards to add internal
development regulations for a platted townhouse development and (2) a deviation from LDC
4.07.02.G.1, Open Space Requirements, which requires Residential PUD districts to provide a
minimum of 60% useable open space to allow 40% useable open space to address the challenges created
by the platting regulations and the definition of useable open space. The following are the changes
proposed for this PDI:
1. The modification to Exhibit B Table 1 – Residential Development Standards to add development
standards for Townhouses. (See Staff Analysis Zoning section of staff report)
2. Add a deviation from the Open Space Requirements, which requires Residential PUD districts to
provide a minimum of 60% useable open space to allow 40% useable open space . (See Deviation
Discussion section in staff report)
LAND USE AND ZONING:
This section of the staff report identifies the land uses and zoning classifications for properties near the
portion of the PUD affected by the request.
North: Adkins Avenue, a two-lane arterial, then farther north is a water management area,
zoned Rural Agricultural (A)
East: Sunset Boulevard, a two-lane arterial, then farther east is single-family residential,
zoned A [0.2 dwelling units per acre (1 du/5 acres)]
South: Polly Avenue, a two-lane arterial, then a vacant parcel, and farther south is single-family
residential, zoned A [0.2 dwelling units per acre (1 du/5 acres)]
West: Santa Barbara Boulevard, a six-lane arterial, then farther west is Tract N (drainage
easement) of Royal Woods Golf and Country Club, zoned PUD (3.34 dwelling units per
acre)
3.B.a
Packet Pg. 86 Attachment: Staff Report - Onyx PDI [Revision 2] (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
PDI-PL20240004116, Onyx Last revised: 9/12/24 Page 4 of 9
Hearing Examiner (HEX) Date: 9/26/24
Source: LJA Engineering, Inc.
STAFF ANALYSIS:
Comprehensive Planning: Because this application does not add uses or increase the intensity of the
previously approved uses in the Onyx RPUD, it is consistent with the Future Land Use Element (FLUE)
of the GMP.
Conservation and Coastal Management Element: Environmental staff has evaluated the proposed
changes to the PUD documents and found no issue with consistency.
Transportation Element: Transportation Planning staff has evaluated the proposed changes to the PUD
documents and found no issue with consistency.
Zoning: The Onyx RPUD was approved on September 13, 2016, via Ordinance 16-24 for the
development of up to 48 single family, zero lot line, townhouse and/or multi-family dwelling units. A
SFWMD Permit No. 11-100683-P was approved on October 22, 2018, and was subsequently modified
on December 6, 2023. A Site Development Plan (SDP) was approved on March 3, 2020. The SDP was
based on developing a condominium style community.
3.B.a
Packet Pg. 87 Attachment: Staff Report - Onyx PDI [Revision 2] (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
PDI-PL20240004116, Onyx Last revised: 9/12/24 Page 5 of 9
Hearing Examiner (HEX) Date: 9/26/24
The original owner started construction of two of the townhouse buildings and the clubhouse. Only the
slabs and walls were complete. Due to a number of issues, construction stopped, and the applicant,
Naples Preserve Villas, LLC, purchased the property. The applicant has demolished the existing
improvements to construct a similar building product. As such, the applicant is requesting to revise
Exhibit B, Table I Development Regulations Table, to specify internal development regulations for a
platted townhouse development. The existing RPUD did not account for some of the regulations
associated with a platted development, and the proposed differences only apply to internal setbacks,
building separation, lot widths, and useable open space. All other elements remain the same. The
following proposed changes are:
1. Minimum lot area of 1,800 SF is added to reflect the minimum platted lot size. None was
previously provided for a Townhouse.
2. A 20ft. minimum lot width is proposed for each platted Townhouse unit. The existing 60ft. for
multi-family and townhouse does not work for the typical platted attached townhouse product.
3. The minimum floor area per unit is 1,400 SF.
4. Setbacks from Polly Avenue, Sunset Avenue, Santa Barbara, and Adkins Avenue remain the
same as previously approved.
5. The minimum 20ft. distance between structures applies at two locations. (See Attachment C,
Development Standards Locations, illustrative purposes only). This separation will continue to
accommodate emergency services and fire truck access, creating no safety issues. Accessory
structures will meet a 10ft. separation.
6. Proposed minimum Townhouse unit internal setbacks (See Attachment C, Development
Standards Locations, Attachment D – Corner Lot, Unit Setbacks, and Attachment E - Clubhouse
Detail, illustrative purposes only):
a. Front Yard – On lots that front on two rights-of-way, the front yard setback will be a
minimum of 20 ft from the lot line on the side of the structure that has the driveway and the
front yard setback of 6 ft. when adjacent to the side of the structure that does not have a
driveway. The purpose of this differentiation is due to the plat creating a parcel line that ends
at the platted rights-of-way and not the edge of pavement. A minimum 20ft distance from
the structure’s exterior wall to the edge of pavement will be the same as the previously
approved SDP setback (See Attachment D – Corner Lot, Unit Setbacks, illustrative purposes
only). A 23ft. driveway will be maintained and includes the minimum front yard of 20ft. and
the distance between the lot line and the sidewalk.
b. Side Yard – A zero ft. side yard applies to the shared walls of the Townhouse units. The 6ft.
setback applies to the side of the structure that does not have a driveway.
c. Rear Yard – A 10 ft. rear yard setback is measured from the rear wall of the unit to the platted
lot line while maintaining a 20ft. perimeter setback.
7. Accessory structures - will have the same setbacks as the principal structures.
8. The Clubhouse parcel setbacks (See Attachment E - Clubhouse Detail, illustrative purposes
only).
a. The clubhouse parcel will meet a 10ft. setback on the front, side, and rear to its parcel line
and maintain the 20ft. setback from the perimeter.
9. Setbacks from landscape buffer easements (See Attachment D – Corner Lot, Unit Setbacks, and
Attachment E – Clubhouse Detail, illustrative purposes only).
a. Townhouse units, Clubhouse, and Accessory structures will have a 10ft. setback from
perimeter buffers and a zero ft. setback from internal buffers.
3.B.a
Packet Pg. 88 Attachment: Staff Report - Onyx PDI [Revision 2] (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
PDI-PL20240004116, Onyx Last revised: 9/12/24 Page 6 of 9
Hearing Examiner (HEX) Date: 9/26/24
It is important to note that the development layout is essentially the same as the approved site
development plan (Attachment F – Approved SDP PL20190002911, illustrative purposes only), which
was based on a condominium-style development. Attachment G – Draft Plat Plan PL20240002384, for
illustrative purposes only, is the draft Plat plan that depicts the same layout as the previously approved
SDP. There are no changes to the perimeter elements, including the perimeter setbacks to the adjacent
County rights-of-way, stormwater and preserve areas, and buffers. There are no new external impacts;
therefore, compatibility will remain as previously approved, and all other requirements will be met.
The deviation request is based on a conflict between plats and the definition of useable open space.
However, as detailed below, the project will still provide the previously approved 4.67 +/- acres of
open space.
LDC Sections 10.02.13.E.1 and 10.02.13.E.2 set forth the criteria by which insubstantial amendments
to a PUD Master Plan and/or minor text changes to a PUD Document are to be reviewed before they
can be approved. The criteria and a response to each have been listed as follows:
LDC Section 10.02.13.E.1:
a. Is there a proposed change in the boundary of the Planned Unit Development (PUD)?
No, there is no proposed change in the boundary of the PUD.
b. Is there a proposed increase in the total number of dwelling units, intensity of land use,
or height of buildings within the development?
No, there is no proposed increase in the number of dwelling units, intensity of land use, or
height of buildings within the development.
c. Is there a proposed decrease in preservation, conservation, recreation, or open space areas
within the development in excess of 5% of the total acreage previously designated as such,
or five acres in area?
No, there is no proposed decrease in preservation, conservation, recreation, or open space areas
within the development as designated on the approved Master Plan.
d. Is there a proposed increase in the size of areas used for non-residential uses, including
institutional, commercial, and industrial land uses (excluding preservation, conservation,
or open space), or a proposed relocation of nonresidential land uses?
There would be no increase to the size of areas used for non-residential uses and no relocation
of non-residential areas.
e. Is there a substantial increase in the impacts of the development, which may include, but
are not limited to, increases in traffic generation, changes in traffic circulation, or impacts
on other public facilities?
No, there are no substantial impacts resulting from this amendment.
3.B.a
Packet Pg. 89 Attachment: Staff Report - Onyx PDI [Revision 2] (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
PDI-PL20240004116, Onyx Last revised: 9/12/24 Page 7 of 9
Hearing Examiner (HEX) Date: 9/26/24
f. Will the change result in land use activities that generate a higher level of vehicular traffic
based upon the Trip Generation Manual published by the Institute of Transportation
Engineers?
No, there are no substantial impacts resulting from this amendment.
g. Will the change result in a requirement for increased stormwater retention or otherwise
increase stormwater discharge?
No, the proposed changes will not impact or increase stormwater retention or increase
stormwater discharge.
h. Will the proposed change bring about a relationship to an abutting land use that would
be incompatible with an adjacent land use?
No. There will be no incompatible relationships with abutting land uses.
i. Are there any modifications to the PUD Master Plan or PUD Document or amendment to
a PUD ordinance that is inconsistent with the Future Land Use Element or other elements
of the Growth Management Plan, or which modification would increase the density of
intensity of the permitted land uses?
No. Comprehensive Planning staff determined the proposed changes to the PUD Document
would be consistent with the FLUE of the GMP. Both environmental and transportation
planning staff have reviewed this petition, and no changes to the PUD Document are proposed
that would be deemed inconsistent with the Conservation and Coastal Management Element
(CCME) or the Transportation Element of the GMP. This petition does not propose any
increase in density or intensity of the permitted land uses.
LDC Section 10.02.13.E.2:
Does this petition change the analysis of the findings and criteria used for the original
application?
No, the proposed change does not affect the original analysis and findings for the most recent
zoning action in Petition PUDZ-PL20140000890. An excerpt from the staff report prepared for
that petition is attached as Attachment I.
DEVIATION DISCUSSION:
The petitioner is seeking one deviation from the requirements of the LDC. The petitioner’s rationale
and staff analysis/recommendation are outlined below.
Proposed Deviation #4 (Open space requirements)
“Deviation #4 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.07.02.G.1, Open space requirements, which requires
residential PUD districts to provide a minimum of 60% useable open space to allow 40% useable open
space.”
3.B.a
Packet Pg. 90 Attachment: Staff Report - Onyx PDI [Revision 2] (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
PDI-PL20240004116, Onyx Last revised: 9/12/24 Page 8 of 9
Hearing Examiner (HEX) Date: 9/26/24
Petitioner’s Justification: As stated, the Applicant is requesting a deviation from the 60% open space
requirement to allow 40% open space to address the conflict created by the platting regulations and
with the definition of useable open space.
The LDC definition of useable open space:
Open space, usable: Active or passive recreation areas such as parks, playgrounds, tennis courts, golf
courses, beach frontage, waterways, lakes, lagoons, floodplains, nature trails, and other similar open
spaces. Usable open space areas shall also include those portions of areas set aside for the
preservation of native vegetation, required yards (setbacks), and landscaped areas that are accessible
to and usable by residents of an individual lot, the development, or the general public. Open water
area beyond the perimeter of the site, street rights-of-way, driveways, off-street parking and loading
areas, shall not be counted towards required Usable Open Space.
This last sentence is what creates the conflict. The platting of the project results in privately owned
street rights-of-way that coincides with the platted residential unit’s lot lines. The sidewalks and some
of the greenspace/landscape areas are located within the platted rights of way. These elements were
included in the open space calculations on the SDP. This request is to simply allow the same elements
to be included in the useable open space calculations on the Townhouse Site Plan and Plat. Attachment
G - Draft Plat Plan – PL20240002384, illustrative purposes only, depicts this scenario. The approved
(SDP PL20190002911 – Attachment F) and the (Draft Plat Plan – Attachment G) have the same layout
with the similar amount of open space of 4.67 acres. The following open space table approved for the
SDP notes that the preserve, green space, sidewalk, & pool deck are included in the open space table.
Since the plat layout is essentially the same as the SDP, the open space required and provided will be
exactly the same 4.67 acres when the sidewalks and green space within the private platted rights-of-
way are included. Attachment H, Open Space Elements of Deviation 4, illustrative purposes only,
depicts the open space elements that are within the platted rights-of-way.
Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Similar deviation requests have been approved with other
zoning petitions; as such, staff sees no detrimental effect if this deviation request is approved. Zoning
and Development Review staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation, finding that in compliance
with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has demonstrated that “the element may be waived
without a detrimental effect on the health, safety, and welfare of the community.” LDC Section
10.02.13.B.5.h, the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is “justified as meeting public
purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations.”
3.B.a
Packet Pg. 91 Attachment: Staff Report - Onyx PDI [Revision 2] (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
PDI-PL20240004116, Onyx Last revised: 9/12/24 Page 9 of 9
Hearing Examiner (HEX) Date: 9/26/24
NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM):
The applicant conducted a NIM on September 10, 2024, at South Regional Library, located at 8065
Lely Cultural Pkwy, Naples, FL. The meeting commenced at approximately 5:31 p.m. and ended at
6:02 p.m. Margaret Emblidge, the agent, conducted the meeting by introducing the consultant team and
staff and giving a PowerPoint presentation. The presentation consisted of an overview of the proposed
PDI application. Following the agent’s presentation, the meeting was open to attendees to make
comments and ask the consultant team questions regarding the proposed development. The issues
discussed were public access, dry retention area, removal of exotics from the preserve, building height,
lighting, maintenance of the preserve, timeline of the project, bedrooms in each unit, unit price, and
detention area drainage. Margaret and the consultant team answered all concerns. The agent also
confirmed that there will be no additional new materials submitted between the NIM and the September
26 HEX hearing. No commitments were made. A copy of the NIM Summary, sign-in sheet, and NIM
PowerPoint presentation are included in Attachment K.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Collier County Hearing Examiner approve Petition PDI-PL20240004116.
Attachments:
A) Revised PUD Exhibit B – Development Regulations Table 1 – To be adopted with HEX
decision
B) Revised PUD Exhibit E – Deviations – To be adopted with HEX decision
C) Development Standards Locations – Illustrative purposes only
D) Corner Lot – Unit Setbacks - Illustrative purposes only
E) Clubhouse Detail - Illustrative purposes only
F) Approved Site Development Plan PL20190002911 - Illustrative purposes only
G) Draft Plat Plan PL20240002384 - Illustrative purposes only
H) Open Space Elements of Deviation 4 - Illustrative purposes only
I) Original Analysis and Findings
J) Application – Backup Materials
K) NIM Materials
L) Hearing Advertising Signs
3.B.a
Packet Pg. 92 Attachment: Staff Report - Onyx PDI [Revision 2] (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
Page 1 of 3
Revised July 15,2024
EXHIBIT B DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS:
Table I below sets forth the development standards for Single-Family and Multi-Family Residential land
uses within the proposed Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD). Standards not specifically set
forth within this application shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the
date of approval of the SDP or Subdivision plat.
TABLE I - RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
MULTI-FAMILY
DWELLING &
TOWNHOUSE
(R)
TOWNHOUSE
(R)
SINGLE-FAMILY
DWELLING/
ZERO LOT LINE
(R)
AMENITY
CENTER
(AC)
ACCESSORY
STRUCTURES
MINIMUM LOT AREA N/A 1,800 square feet 3,500 square feet N/A N/A
MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 60 Feet 20 Feet 35 Feet N/A N/A
MINIMUM FLOOR AREA
OF BUILDINGS
1,400 square
feet (per unit) 1,400 square
feet per Unit
1,400 square feet
750 square
feet
N/A
MINIMUM BUILDING
SETBACK (From Polly Avenue)
70 feet 70 feet 70 feet NA 35 feet
MINIMUM BUILDING
SETBACK
(From Sunset Avenue)
150 feet 150 feet 150 feet 150 feet 150 feet
MINIMUM BUILDING
SETBACK (From Santa Barbara Avenue)
30 feet 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet
MINIMUM BUILDING
SETBACK (From Adkins Ave ROW)
20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet
3.B.b
Packet Pg. 93 Attachment: Attachment A - Revised PUD Exhibit B - Development Regulations Table 1 - To be adopted
Page 2 of 3
Revised July 15,2024
MULTI-FAMILY
DWELLING &
TOWNHOUSE
(R)
TOWNHOUSE
(R)
SINGLE-FAMILY
DWELLING/
ZERO LOT LINE
(R)
AMENITY
CENTER (AC)
ACCESSORY
STRUCTURES
MINIMUM DISTANCE
BETWEEN STRUCTURES
Principal Structure Accessory Structure
25 feet 15 feet
20 feet
10 feet
12 feet 0 or 10 feet
N/A
10 feet
SPS
MINIMUM INTERNAL
SETBACKS
Front Yard
Side Yard
Rear Yard
20 feet
20 feet
20 feet
20/6 feet
(2)(5)
0/6 feet (4)
10 feet
20 feet
6 feet, or 0' on one
side and 12'on the
other
20 feet
20 10 feet
10/15 feet(6)
20 10 feet
SPS
20 feet
10 feet
20 feet
SETBACKS FROM
LANDSCAPE BUFFER
EASEMENT (L.B.E.) (3)
10 feet
10 feet
Perimeter
Buffer
0 feet
Internal
Buffer
10 feet 10 feet
10 feet
Perimeter
Buffer
0 feet
Internal
Buffer
10 feet
10 feet
Perimeter
Buffer
0 feet
Internal
Buffer
PRESERVE SETBACK 25 feet 10 feet
MAXIMUM ZONED
HEIGHT
2 stories & 35
feet 2 stories & 35
feet
2 stories & 35 feet 1 story & 25
feet 35 feet
MAXIMUM ACTUAL
HEIGHT
2 stories & 42
feet 2 stories & 42
feet
2 stories & 42 feet 1 story & 25
feet 42 feet
3.B.b
Packet Pg. 94 Attachment: Attachment A - Revised PUD Exhibit B - Development Regulations Table 1 - To be adopted
Page 3 of 3
Revised July 15,2024
Footnotes apply as noted to all tracts and lots in the PUD:
1. If the parcel is directly accessed by a private driveway, setback is measured from the back of curb (if
curbed) or edge-of-pavement (if not curbed). This would apply to multi- family development tracts that
do not have platted road rights-of-way.
2. Front yard setback from the back of sidewalk to the face of the garage door must be a minimum of 23
feet for internal private roads.
3. All L.B.E.'s shall be platted as separate tracts or easements on the Plat.or shown as separate tracts on the SDP.
4. 0/6 side yard – Zero (0) ft. for shared walls and six (6) ft. for exterior side walls of the units from a lot line.
5. Lots that have more than one front yard may reduce the front yard adjacent to the side of the structure that does
not have a driveway, to six (6) ft. from a lot line.
6. Amenity Center - A 15ft. setback is required only at the south property line/tract line.
3.B.b
Packet Pg. 95 Attachment: Attachment A - Revised PUD Exhibit B - Development Regulations Table 1 - To be adopted
Onyx RPUD Ordinance No. 16-24 - Insubstantial Change to a PUD (PDI) PL20240004116
Last Revised June 5, 2024
Words underlined are added.
EXHIBIT E
DEVIATIONS:
Nothing in this PUD Document shall approve a deviation to the LDC unless it is listed in this
Exhibit E.
1. A deviation from LDC Section 6.06.02. A.2 which requires that a 5-foot wide sidewalk be
provided on both sides of public and private rights-of-way or easements which are internal to
the site, to instead provide a 5-foot wide sidewalk on one side of the private right-of-way as
depicted in the master plan (Exhibit C). The sidewalk may only be omitted on one side of a
street which is immediately adjacent to the rear of the structures and where no driveway
accesses are provided. When residential units front on or have driveway access to both
sides of a street, sidewalks shall be provided on both sides of the right of way. Where the
sidewalk is omitted, the owner shall install Type D landscape material in its place. A
landscape buffer easement is not required for these plantings.
2. A deviation from LDC Section 2.03.07 D.4.g which requires, upon the issuance of approval
of a site development plan or subdivision plat that is part of a PUD or DRI, TDR credits and
TDR Bonus credits shall be redeemed at a rate proportional to percentage of the PUD or
DRl's approved gross density that is derived through TOR credits and TOR Bonus credits, to
instead permit the developer to construct all units from base density (35 units) before
requiring application of TDR credits.
3. A deviation from LDC Section 6.06.01.N which establishes the minimum right-of-way width
of 60 feet be utilized, to instead establish that all internal roadways, if platted, may be
reduced to a 50 foot right-of-way configuration in accordance with the right- of-way cross
section attached to the Master Plan Exhibit C.
4. A deviation from LDC Section 4.07.02.G.1, Open space requirements, which requires Residential
PUD districts to provide a minimum of 60% useable open space to allow 40% useable open
space.
3.B.c
Packet Pg. 96 Attachment: Attachment B - Revised PUD Exhibt E - Deviations - To be adopted with HEX decision (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
10' BUFFER
100.67'13.84'17.89'30.00'
PER PUD
150.00'
PER PUD
70.00'PER PUD30.13'
152.40'70.00'(70.0' MIN. REQD.)70.02'(70.0' MIN. REQD.)150.03'44444444311111111122333333333333333333355POLLY AVE.SANTA BARBARA BLVD.4SUNSET BLVD.ADKINS AVE.4PRESERVE1.12 ac.20' BUFFER
STORMWATER1.07 ac.PROJECT NAME:DRAWING TITLE:ACAD FILE NAME:
PLOT VIEW \ LAYOUT
SHEET
OF
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
DATE:REVISIONSNO.DATEBYDATUM:
LJA PROJECT #CLIENT NAME:ACAD FILE #
01
01ONXY RPUD23-0145
.Sobel CompanyMr. Tirso San JoseV. President of Residential Development2385 N.W. Executive Center Dr., Suite 370Boca Raton, Fl 33431....................................................N1" = 120'23-0145 (ONYK)
MK.I
LJA
BLB
ME
JAC
April 2024
N/A
PLAN
LEGEND:
1 - 20 ft. minimum lot width
2 - 20 ft. minimum between
structures
3 - 0 ft. between units and 6 ft
minimum internal side yard
setback
4 - 10 ft. minimum rear setback
5 - 0 ft. setback from internal
landscape buffer easements ORDINANCE 2016-24INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGEEXHIBIT A - TOWNHOME PLAT DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS LOCATIONS 3.B.d
Packet Pg. 97 Attachment: Attachment C - Development Standards Locations - Illustrative purposes only [Revision 1]
LL
L
L
L
20' BUILDING
SETBACK
6' BUILDING SETBACK50' R.O.W.6' BUILDING SETBACK10' BUILDING
SETBACK
10' BUILDING
SETBACK50' R.O.W.
50' R.O.W.20' SETBACKTO CURB20' SETBACKTO CURB23' SETBACK
TO SIDEWALK
PROJECT NAME:DRAWING TITLE:ACAD FILE NAME:
PLOT VIEW \ LAYOUT
SHEET
OF
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
DATE:REVISIONSNO.DATEBYDATUM:
LJA PROJECT #CLIENT NAME:ACAD FILE #
N1" = 30'23-0145 (ONYK)
MK.I
LJA
BLB
ME
JAC
May 2024
N/A
CORNER UNIT
01
01ONXY RPUD23-0145
.SOBEL COMPANYMR.TIRSOSAN JOSEV.PRES OF RRESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT2385 N.W. EXECUTIVE CENTER DR., SUITE 370BOCA RATON, FL 33431....................................................EXHIBIT A.2
CORNER LOT3.B.e
Packet Pg. 98 Attachment: Attachment D - Corner Lot - Unit Setbacks - Illustrative purposes only [Revision 1] (29788 :
E5000FD
MJ
J
J
J
J J J
J
J
J
J
FD
Clubroom
867 SF / 15 NET (ASSEMBLY UNCONCENTRATED
TABLES AND CHAIRS) = 57 OCCUPANTS
Fitness
290 SF / 50 GROSS (EXERCISE ROOM)
= 5 OCCUPANTS
MAILING ROOM
147 SF / 300 GROSS (SHIPPING AREA)
= 1 OCCUPANT
Office
233 SF / 150 GROSS = 2 OCCUPANTS
Card Room
233 SF / 15 NET (ASSEMBLY UNCONCENTRATED
TABLES AND CHAIRS) = 15 OCCUPANTS
20' BUFFER10' BUILDING SETBACK10' BUILDING SETBACK
10' BUFFER
SIDEWALKLANDSCAPING55'
R.O.W SIDEWALKLANDSCAPINGSIDEWALKSIDEWALK10' BUFFER0' BUILDING SETBACK (FROM BUFFER)CLUBHOUSE
50' R.O.W.
6' BUILDING SETBACK
15' TYPE "B" BUFFER
50' R.O.W.PROJECT NAME:DRAWING TITLE:ACAD FILE NAME:
PLOT VIEW \ LAYOUT
SHEET
OF
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
DATE:REVISIONSNO.DATEBYDATUM:
LJA PROJECT #CLIENT NAME:ACAD FILE #
N1" = 30'23-0145 (ONYK)
MK.I
LJA
BLB
ME
JAC
May 2024
N/A
CLUB HOUSE
01
01ONXY RPUD23-0145
.SOBEL COMPANYMR. TIRSOSAN JOSEV. PRES OF RRESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT2385 N.W. EXECUTIVE CENTER DR., SUITE 370BOCA RATON, FL 33431....................................................CLUB HOUSEEXHIBIT A.3
3.B.f
Packet Pg. 99 Attachment: Attachment E - Clubhouse Detail - Illustrative purposes only [Revision 1] (29788 :
Date:Reviewed and Approved For:Permit IssuancePL2019000291103/03/2020EXHIBIT C - ONYX TOWNHOME VILLAS APPROVED SDP PL2019000029113.B.gPacket Pg. 100Attachment: Attachment F - Approved SDP PL20190002911 - Illustrative purposes only (29788 :
EXHIBIT B - DRAFT PLAT PLAN PL20240002384
3.B.h
Packet Pg. 101 Attachment: Attachment G - Draft Plat Plan PL20240002384 - Illustrative purposes only (29788 :
L
L
L
L LE5000FD
MJ
J
J
J
J J J
J
J
J
J
FD
Clubroom
867 SF / 15 NET (ASSEMBLY UNCONCENTRATED
TABLES AND CHAIRS) = 57 OCCUPANTS
Fitness
290 SF / 50 GROSS (EXERCISE ROOM)
= 5 OCCUPANTS
MAILING ROOM
147 SF / 300 GROSS (SHIPPING AREA)
= 1 OCCUPANT
Office
233 SF / 150 GROSS = 2 OCCUPANTS
Card Room
233 SF / 15 NET (ASSEMBLY UNCONCENTRATED
TABLES AND CHAIRS) = 15 OCCUPANTS
55' R.O.WSIDEWALKLANDSCAPING SIDEWALKLANDSCAPINGSIDEWALKSIDEWALK50' R.O.W.
50' R.O.W.PROJECT NAME:DRAWING TITLE:ACAD FILE NAME:
PLOT VIEW \ LAYOUT
SHEET
OF
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
DATE:REVISIONSNO.DATEBYDATUM:
LJA PROJECT #CLIENT NAME:ACAD FILE #
N1" = 30'23-0145 (ONYK)
MK.I
LJA
BLB
ME
JAC
May 2024
N/A
ROW
01
01ONXY RPUD23-0145
.SOBEL COMPANYMR.TIRSOSAN JOSEV.PRES OF RRESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT2385 N.W. EXECUTIVE CENTER DR., SUITE 370BOCA RATON, FL 33431....................................................LEGEND:
Landscaped Areas
(Useable Open Space)
Sidewalks
(Useable Open Space)R.O.W. WITHOPEN SPACE ELEMENTSEXHIBIT E - OPEN SPACE DEVIATION
3.B.i
Packet Pg. 102 Attachment: Attachment H - Open Space Elements of Deviation 4 - Ilustrative purposes only [Revision 1]
Original Analysis and Findings – Onyx RPUD PUDZ-PL20140000890
PUD FINDINGS:
LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5 states that, “In support of its recommendation, the CCPC shall make
findings as to the PUD Master Plan’s compliance with the following criteria in addition to the
findings in LDC Section 10.02.08”:
1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in
relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access,
drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities.
Potable water and sanitary sewer lines are in the vicinity of the subject parcel. The master
plan shows there is an existing eight (8)-inch water main and eight (8)-inch sanitary sewer
line within the Santa Barbara Boulevard right-of-way. The master plan also shows the
location of the existing six (6)-inch force main as well. The project proposes two (2) points
of vehicular ingress/egress along Adkins Avenue.
2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements,
contracts, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly
as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing
operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or
maintained at public expense.
Documents submitted with the application, which were reviewed by the County Attorney’s
Office, demonstrate unified control of the property. The applicant states the property is
under the unified control of the current property owner, “whose sole beneficiary is Jorge
Savloff, Managing Member.”
3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives, and
policies of the Growth Management Plan (GMP).
County staff has reviewed this petition and has offered an analysis of the relevant goals,
objectives, and policies of the GMP within the GMP Consistency section of this staff report
(or within an accompanying memorandum).
4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may
include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering
and screening requirements.
The applicant has responded to this criterion by stating as follows: “In addition to the use
of native vegetation, buffering, increased setbacks, and building height limitations, the
owner has agreed to ensure that each unit will include one attached garage. This self-
imposed requirement is intended to ensure that apartment-style development with a high
amount of at-grade parking lots will not be developed in this location. This commitment
has been made in concert with the neighbors who have participated in the public process
to date.”
3.B.j
Packet Pg. 103 Attachment: Attachment I - Original Analysis and Findings (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the
development.
The total area required for open space is sixty percent (60%) or 4.67 acres. The land use
summary in the master plan indicates that 3.32 acres would be open space. This equates to
42.6%, which is less than the minimum required. The applicant states the project would
be compliant by “utilizing active or passive recreation areas as well as required yards and
landscape areas which will meet or exceed the sixty percent (60%) requirement.
Compliance with open space requirements must be demonstrated at the time of platting.
6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of
available improvements and facilities, both public and private.
The applicant has responded to this criterion by stating as follows: “The development may
be phased over the course of 2-3 years, and adequacy of roadway capacity, water and sewer
availability, school capacity and fire/EMS service has been shown to be available.” The
proposed rezoning petition represents a net increase in the number of peak hour trips;
however, as noted in the GMP Consistency section of this staff report, the adjacent roadway
network has sufficient capacity to accommodate the proposed new trips. Operational
impacts will be addressed at time of first development order (SDP or Plat). Additionally,
the project’s development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management
regulations when development approvals are sought.
7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate
expansion.
The area has adequate supporting infrastructure, such as wastewater systems and potable
water supplies to accommodate this project based upon the commitments made by the
petitioner and the fact that adequate public facilities requirements will be addressed when
development approvals are sought.
8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations
in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as
meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such
regulations.
Two (2) deviations are being requested with this petition. Staff supports both deviations.
Rezone Findings:
LDC Subsection 10.02.08.F states, “When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and
recommendations to the planning commission to the Board of County Commissioners…shall show
that the planning commission has studied and considered proposed change in relation to the
following when applicable”:
1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies
of the Future Land Use Map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan.
3.B.j
Packet Pg. 104 Attachment: Attachment I - Original Analysis and Findings (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
Comprehensive Planning staff determined the subject petition is consistent with the goals,
objectives, and policies of the FLUM and elements of the GMP.
2. The existing land use pattern.
The existing land use pattern (of the adjacent properties) is described in the Surrounding
Land Use and Zoning section of this staff report. Staff determined the proposed uses are
appropriate for this area of the County. The PUD density would be approximately 5.5
dwelling units per acre, which is consistent with the density rating system in the FLUE of
the GMP and would further the County’s TDR Program.
3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts.
The Official Zoning Map shows the parcels are directly adjacent to Waterford Estates PUD
and the Royal Wood Golf and Country Club PUD. Therefore, it is staff’s opinion that
rezoning these parcels from RMF-6 to RPUD would not create an isolated district unrelated
to adjacent and nearby districts.
4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing
conditions on the property proposed for change.
The subject parcel is currently owned by the Polly Ave, LLC. The square-shaped boundary
of the new RPUD is not illogically drawn.
5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed rezoning
necessary.
The proposed change is not necessary, per se; but it is being requested in compliance with
the LDC provisions to seek such changes. The rezoning to RPUD also allows for the two
(2) deviations.
6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the
neighborhood.
Staff does not anticipate the new uses would adversely impact living conditions in the
neighboring community.
7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or
create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of
peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during
construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety.
The proposed rezoning represents a net increase in the number of peak hour trips; however,
the adjacent roadway network has sufficient capacity to accommodate the proposed new
trips. The project’s development must also comply with all other applicable concurrency
management regulations and operational improvements when development approvals are
sought at time of SDP or PPL review.
8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem.
3.B.j
Packet Pg. 105 Attachment: Attachment I - Original Analysis and Findings (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
The proposed change will not create a drainage problem as the applicant will be required
to submit a SFWMD permit and all required stormwater documentation to County staff to
be evaluated during the development review process.
9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas.
It is not anticipated that this amendment would significantly reduce light or air to the
adjacent areas.
10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent
area.
This is a subjective determination based upon anticipated results, which may be internal or
external to the subject property. Property valuation is affected by a host of factors including
zoning; however, zoning by itself may or may not affect values, since value determination
is driven by market value. There is no guarantee that the project will be marketed in a
manner comparable to the surrounding developments.
11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development
of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations.
Staff does not anticipate the rezoning to RPUD would be a deterrent to the improvement
or development of the vacant property to the south of Polly Avenue; neither would it have
any effect on the adjacent water management area to the north; nor the adjacent properties
to the west; nor in connection with the Royal Wood Golf and Country Club PUD; nor the
adjacent properties to the east, which have already been developed with residential uses.
12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an
individual owner as contrasting with the public welfare.
If the proposed development complies with the GMP through the proposed amendment,
then that constitutes a public policy statement supporting zoning actions when they are
consistent with said Comprehensive Plan. In light of this fact, the proposed change does
not constitute a grant of special privilege. Consistency with the FLUE is further determined
to be a public welfare relationship because actions consistent with plans are in the public
interest.
13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance
with existing zoning.
The property may still be developed within the parameters of the current RMF-6 zoning district
at a density cap of 3.2 units per acre; however, the petitioner is requesting a density bonus,
which is allowed under the GMP. A density bonus requires a rezoni ng and therefore, the
petition can be evaluated and action taken as deemed appropriate through the public hearing
process.
3.B.j
Packet Pg. 106 Attachment: Attachment I - Original Analysis and Findings (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or
the County.
It is staff’s opinion the proposed uses and associated development standards will ensure
that the project is not out of scale with the needs of the community.
15. Whether is it impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed
use in districts already permitting such use.
The petition was reviewed on its own merit for compliance with the GMP and the LDC,
and staff does not specifically review other sites in conjunction with a specific petition.
16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration, which
would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses
under the proposed zoning classification.
Any development anticipated by the PUD Document would require considerable site
alteration, and this project will undergo extensive evaluation relative to all federal, state,
and local development regulations during the platting or SDP process, and again later as
part of the building permit process.
17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and
services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth
Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County
Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, as amended.
The project will have to meet all applicable criteria set forth in LDC Section 6.02.00
regarding Adequate Public Facilities (APF) and the project will need to be consistent with
all applicable goals and objectives of the GMP regarding adequate public facilities, except
as may be exempt by federal regulations. This petition has been reviewed by County staff
responsible for jurisdictional elements of the GMP as part of the amendment process and
those staff persons have concluded that no Level of Service will be adversely impacted
with the commitments contained in the PUD Document. The concurrency review for APF
is determined at the time of PPL or SDP review.
18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners
(BCC) shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare.
To be determined by the BCC during their advertised public hearing.
3.B.j
Packet Pg. 107 Attachment: Attachment I - Original Analysis and Findings (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
Qovtnt!
Growth Management Community Development Department
2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104
Phone : (2391 252-1036 | E ma i I : G M DClientSe rvices @col I i e rcou ntyfl .gov
www.co I I ierco u ntyf l. gov
Collier County Planning Commission Agenda Packet Checklist for PUDs
to be submitted by Applicants and Agents
Materials provided by Planner:
o Staff Report
o Complete Draft Ordinance /Resolution initialed by County Attorney
Materials to be provided by applicant:
V
a
Va
V
Application
o Narrative of rezone request
o Property lnformation
o Property Ownership and general description of site
Disclosure of lnterest
Affidavit of Unified Control N/A
Affidavit of Representation
NIM lnformation (Sign-in sheet, notes, minutes and/or summary, audio or video recordingl NIM will be held on 9ll0l24 -
we will provide on9ll1l24
Traffic lmpact Study (TlS) N/A
Environmental Data N/A
Historical/Archeological Survey or Waiver N/A
Utility Letter
Deviation J ustifications
Boundary Survey
Amended PUD Ordinan ce (the last submitted Ordinonce with strikethrough - color preferred)
Other documents /os needed, on o cose-by-cose bosis) such as relevant prior ordinances, conditionaluses,
historical documents, any "private or legal" agreements affecting the PUD etc. Write details below.
I understond thot by submitting the above moteriols, it is the ogent/opplicont's responsibility to ensure oll moteriols ore in the some
order for oll copies of bockup materiols to provide to the CCPC ond the CD must contoin the documents in one pdf file (not multiple
files) in the some order os the printed moteriols. lt is the ogent's responsibility to ensure no documentotion is left out.
M a rg a re t E m b I i d g e 3 :','j:'rryr;;ifr:,?,, X,1':,1f lffi i
o n "Auwst23.2024
DateSignature of Agent Representative
AICP
ame
{
0e12022
ng prese
Page 1 of 1
Please provide the followinF documents to support your petition request:
3.B.k
Packet Pg. 108 Attachment: Attachment J - Application-Backup Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
C,Rfr,Corawry
Need Help?
GMCD Public Portal
Online Pavment Guide
E-Permittinq GuidesGrowth Management
Community Development Department
Pursuant to LDC subsection 10, a PUD insubstantial change includes any change that is not
considered a substantial or a minor change. A PUD insubstantial change to an approved PUD
ordinance shall be based upon an evaluation of LDC subsection 10 and shall require the review
and approval of the Hearing Examiner. The Hearing Examiner's approval shall be based on the
findings and criteria used for the original application
APPLICANT CONTACT ! NFORMATION
Name of Property Owner(s):Naples Preserve Villas, LLC
Name of Applicant if different than owner:
Address: 2385 NW Executive Center Dr., #370 6i1y.Boca Raton Clala.FL 7t p: 33431
Telephone: 661) 994-3434 Cell: _Fax: _
E-MailAddress:tsanjose@sobelco.com
Name of Agent:Margaret Emblidge, AICP
Firm:LJA Engineering,Inc.
Address: 7400 Trail Boulevard, Ste. 200 City: Naples State FL
Telephone:59',7 -31t1 Cell:
E-MailAddress:memblidge@lja.com
7t P: 34108
DETAIL OF REQUEST
On a separate sheet, attached to the application, describe the insubstantial change request.
ldentify how the request does not meet the PUD substantial change criteria established in LDC
subsection 10.02.13 E.1.
Revised 2024 Paqe 1 of 4
Division .2800 North Horseshoe Drive . Naples, FL34104.239-252-2400
www.colliercounM.qov/
lnsubstantial Change to a PUD (PDl)
LDC subsection 10
Chaoter 3 of the Administrative Gode
3.B.k
Packet Pg. 109 Attachment: Attachment J - Application-Backup Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
C,Rff",Covrnty
Growth Management
Community Development Department
PUD NAME: OnyT RPUD ORDINANCENUMBER: 16-24
FOIIO NUMBER(S): See attached list
Provide a legal (if PUD is recorded) or graphic description of area of amendment (this may be
graphically illustrated on Amended PUD Master Plan). lf applying for a portion of the PUD, provide a
legal description for subject portion.
Attach on a separate sheet, a written description of the map or text change.
Does amendment comply with the Growth Management Plan?x Yes Er,lo
Has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? ! v"t x No
Has any portion of the PUD been x SOLD and/or x DEVELO P E D?
Are any changes proposed for the area sold and/or developed? ! Ves
lf yes, please describe on an attached separate sheet.
x No
Need Help?
GMCD Public Portal
Online Pavment Guide
E-Permittinq Guides
Revised 2024
Division .2800 North Horseshoe Drive . Naples, FL 34'104 .239-252-2400
w!wv.col,iercounM.aov/
Paa,e 2 ot 4
lf no, please explain: _
lf yes, in whose name?
3.B.k
Packet Pg. 110 Attachment: Attachment J - Application-Backup Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
C,Rft,Covrnql
Need Help?
GMCD Public Portal
Online Pavment Guide
E-Permittinq GuidesGrowth Management
Community Development Department
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS:
. FollowinB the com pletion of the review process by County Review staff, the applica nt shall su bmit
all materials electronically to the designated project manager.
. Pleasecontacttheprojectmanagertoconfirmthenumberofadditional copies required.
REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW REQUIRED NOT
REQUIRED
Completed Application (download current form from County website)
Pre-Application Meeting notes
Project Narrative, including a detailed description of proposed changes
and why amendment is necessary
Detail of request X
Current Master Plan & l Reduced Copy
Revised Master Plan & L Reduced Copy N/A - not beins revised X
Revised Text and any exhibits x
PUD document with chan crossed through & u nderlined x
PUD document as revised with amended Title Page with Ordinance #x
Warranty Deed I
Legal Description x
Boundarysurvey, if boundaryof original PUDisamended N.\
lf PUD is platted, include plat book pages N/A - Not platted yet
List identifying Owner & all parties of corporation See Annual R ort x
Affidavit of Authorization, sisned & notarized x
X
X
Copy of I % in. x 11 in. gra phic location map of site x
Electronic copy of all documents and plans
+Please advise: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requ ires all materials
to be su bmitted electronicall in PDF format.
ilf located in lmmokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal
requirement.
Revised 2024
Division .2800 North Horseshoe Drive . Naples,FL34104 - 239-252-2400
w!wv.colliercounh/fl .oov/
Paqe 3 of 4
The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre-Application Meeting and at
time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the
application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets
attached to each section. lncomplete submittals will not be accepted.
n
Completed Addressins Checklist
Propertv OwnershiD Disclosure Form
n tr
lr-r-fr
ffi
tf_lTtf
I
--uF
t-
t_l
-r-
--T_-f
f-Er
3.B.k
Packet Pg. 111 Attachment: Attachment J - Application-Backup Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
Couttty
Growth Management
Community Development Department
Age r Signature
TZ,et o SAp roJC
Applicant/Owner Name (please print)
Need Help?
GMCD Public Portal
Online Pavment Guide
E-Permittino Guides
PLANNERS - !NDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOW!NG REVIEWERS:
FEE REQUIREMENTS
E PUDAmendmentlnsubstantial (PDI): 5L,500.00
D Pre-Application Meeting: SSOO.OO (Paid Prior to Prc-Application Mccting)
E Estimated LegalAdvertising fee forthe Office of the Hearing Examiner: 5L,125.00
Same fee applies if the petition is referred to the Collier County Planning Commission, where the
CCPC serves as the deciding authority instead of the HEX.
X Fire Planning Review Fee: $t50.OO
Fire Code Plons Review Fees are collected ot the time of opplication submission and those fees dre set
forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Lond Development Code requires Neighborhood
Notification moilers for Applicotions heoded to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to heoring.
As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this
checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal
information may result in the delay of processing this petition.
Naples Preserve Villas, LLC
By:
!School District (Residential Components):Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment:
Executive Director
tr Utilities Engineering:Parks and Recreation
Emergency Management:Naples Airport Authority:
Conservancy of SWFL:Other:
City of Naples Other:
Revised 2024 Pase 4ol 4
Division . 2800 North Horseshoe Drive . Naples, FL 34104 . 239-252-2400
www. colliercountvfl . oov/
-4laflto*Date I
n
tr
ft
t-l
f
3.B.k
Packet Pg. 112 Attachment: Attachment J - Application-Backup Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
64637000024
64637000040
64637000066
64637000082
64637000105
64637000r21
64637000147
64637000163
64637000189
64637000202
64637000228
64637000244
64637000260
64637000286
64637000309
64637000325
6463700034t
64637000367
64637000383
64637000406
64637000422
64637000448
64637000464
64637000480
Naples Preserve Villas, LLC (Santa Barbara Place Villas)
Folio Numbers
64637000503
64637000529
64637000545
64637000s61
64637000587
64637000600
64637000626
64637000642
64637000668
64637000684
64637000707
64637000723
64637000749
64637000765
6463 7000781
64637000804
64637000820
64637000846
64637000862
64637000888
6463 7000901
64637000927
64637000943
64637000969
3.B.k
Packet Pg. 113 Attachment: Attachment J - Application-Backup Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
Naples Preserve Villas, LLC
2385 NW Executive Center Drive
Suite 370
Boca Raton, F1,33431
Main Line (551) 994-3434
Letter of Authorization
Naples Preserve Villas, LLC
Whose Address is:
2385 NW Executive Center Drive
Suite 370
Boca Raton, Ft" 33431
Hereby designates:
Tirso San Jose
2385 NW Executive Center Drive
Suite 370
Boca Raton, Fl- 33431
To act on behalf of Naples Preserve Villas, LLC for the purpose of submitting any application needed for permitting, zoning or
construction contracts on property located at:
Parcel One:
The East 1/2 of the Southwest U4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 16, Township 50 South, Range 26 Eas!
Less the North 30 Feet, the East 30 Feet and the South 30 Feet thereof, Collier County, Florida.
AND
Parcel Two:
The West {2 ofthe Southwest L/4 otthe southwest Tl4ofthe Northwest 1/4 of Section 15, Township 50 South, Range 26
East, less the North 30 Feet and the South 30 Feet, Collier County, Florida.
Parcel lD# of 528080 1015816, Containing approximately 8,7 total acres (378,972 Square feet) of land zoned multifamily around
address 5950 Onyx Cir, Naples, FL,34L72
More commonly known as:
Naples Preserve Villas, LLC
Signed this 11th
Naplesr7reserve
a.Fbrida limited
By:
Jeffrey E. Sobel
Its: Member
?
Name
NOTilftY'S as to Owner or reVAil
or Produced I dentif ication_Personally
of ldentification Produced_
*)
3.B.k
Packet Pg. 114 Attachment: Attachment J - Application-Backup Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
ONYX RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE
PROJECT NARRATIVE & DETAIL OF REQUEST
NARRATIVE
The Applicant, Naples Preserve Villas, LLC, is a requesting to amend the Onyx RPUD Ordinance No. 16-24
pursuant to LDC Section 10.02.1-3.E.2. lnsubstantial Change.
Specifically, this request is to revise RPUD Exhibit B, Table I Development Regulations Table to specify
internaldevelopment regulations for a platted townhome developm€nt. The existing RPUD did not account
for some of the regulations associated with a platted development. The differences only apply to internal
setbacks, building separation, lot widths and useable open space. All other elements remain the same.
ln addition to the Development Regulations, the Applicant is requesting a deviation from the 60% open
space requirement to allow 40% open space to address the challenges created by the platting regulations
and the definition of useable open space. see detailed requests below.
H istory
The Onyx RPUD was approved on September 13,2015, see enclosed ordinance. A SFWMD permit No. 11-
100683-P was approved Odober 22,2018, and was subsequently modified on Decem ber 6, 2023. A Site
Development Plan (SDP) was approved on March 3, 2020 (see Exhibit C). The SDP was based on developing
a condominium style community.
The original owner started construction of two of townhome buildings and the clu bhouse. Only the slabs
and walls were complete. Due to a number of issues construction stopped and the property was purchased
by the applicant, Naples Preserve Villas, LLC. The current owner has demolished the existing improvements
to construct a similar building product.
DETAIL OF REQUEST
Development Regulations
As depicted on the enclosed Revised RPUD Exhibit B, Table I Development Regulations Table and Exhibits A,
A.2, and A.3 a new set of development regulations are proposed to specifically apply to a platted townhome
development. The following standards are proposed:
1. Minimum lot area of 1,800 SF is added to reflect the minimum platted lot size. None was previously
provided for a Townhome.
2. A20ft. minimum lot width is proposed for each platted Townhome unit. The existing 60ft. for multi-
family and townhome does not work for the typical platted attached townhome product.
3. The minimum floor area per unit, setbacks from polly Avenue, Sunset Avenue, Santa Barbara, and
Adkins Avenue remain the same as previously approved.
4. The minimum 20ft. distance between structures applies at two locations as depicted on Exhibit A.
This separation will continue to accommodate emergency services and fire truck access creating no
safety issues. Accessory structures will meet a Loft. separation.
3.B.k
Packet Pg. 115 Attachment: Attachment J - Application-Backup Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
5. Proposed minimum Townhome unit internal setbacks (See Exhibits A, A.2 and A.3):
. Front Yard - On lots that front on two rights-of-way, the front yard setback will be a
minimum of 20 ft from the lot line on the side ofthe structure that has the driveway and the
front yard setback of 6 ft. when adjacent to the side of the structu re that does not have
a d riveway. The pu rpose of this differentiation is d ue to the plat creating a pa rcel line
that ends at the platted rights-of-way and not the edge of pavement. A minimum 20ft
distance from the structure's exterior wall to the edge of pavement will be the same as the
SDP setback (See Exhibit A.2). A 23ft. driveway will be maintained and includes the minimum
front yard of 20ft. and the distance between the lot line and the sidewalk.
. Side Yard - A zero ft. side yard applies to the shared walls of the Townhome units. The 6ft.
setback applies to the side ofthe structure that does not have a driveway.. Rear Yard - A 10 ft. rear ya rd setback is measu red from the rear wall of the unit to the platted
lot Iine while maintaining a 20ft. perimeter setback.
6. Accessory structures - will have the same setbacks as the principal structures.
7. The Clubhouse parcel setbacks (See Exhibit A.3).
o The clubhouse parcel will meet a 10ft. setback on the front, side and rear to its parcel line
and maintain the 20ft. setback from the perimeter.
8. S€tbacks from landscape buffer easements (See Exhibits A.2 and A.3).
. Townhome units, Clubhouse and Accessory structures will have a 10ft. setback from
perimeter buffers and a zero ft. setback from internal buffers.
It is important to note that the development layout is essentially the same as the approved site
development plan (Exhibit C) which was based on a condominium style development. Exhibit D is the draft
Plat plans that depicts the same layout. There are no changes to the perimeter elements including the
perimeter setbacks to the ad.iacent County rights-of-way, stormwater and preserve areas, and buffers. There
are no new external impacts therefore compatibility will remain as previously approved, and all other
requirements will be met. The following deviation request is based on a conflict between plats and the
definition of useable open space. However, as detailed below, the project will still provide the previously
approved 4.67 +/- acres of open space.
Open Space Deviation Request
Requesting relieffrom LDC Section 4.07.02.G.1,, Open space requirements, which requires Residential PUD
districts to provide a minimum of 60% useable open space to allow 40% useable open space.
Justification
As stated, the Applicant is requesting a deviation from the 60% open space requirement to allow 40% open
space to address the conflict created by the platting regulations and with the definition of useable open
space.
The definition of useable open space:
Open spoce, usdble: Active or possive recreotion oreos such os porks, ploygrounds, tennis courts, golf
courses, beoch frontoge, waterwdys, lokes, logoons, floodploins, noture troils and other similar open spoces-
Usoble open space areos sholl olso include those portions of oreos set oside for preservotion of notive
vegetotion, required yords (setbacks)ond londscoped dreas, which ore accessible to ond usoble by residents
3.B.k
Packet Pg. 116 Attachment: Attachment J - Application-Backup Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
oI dn individuol lot, the development, or the generol public. Open woter oreo bevond the oerimeter of the
site. street rio hts-o wo v.drivewavs. off-street Dorkino ond loodina oreos. s holl not be counted towordsf-
reo uired Usoble Open Spoce
This last sentence is what creates the conflict. The platting of the project results in privately owned street
rights-of-way that coincides with the platted residential unit's lot lines. The sidewalks and some of the
gree ns pa ce/la ndsca pe areas are located within the platted rights of way. These elements were included in
the open space calculations on the SDP. This request is to simply allow the same elements to be included in
the useable open space calculations on the Townhouse Site Plan and Plat. Exhibit B - Draft Plat Plan depicts
this scenario. The approved SDP P120190002911 -Exhibit C and the Draft Plat Plan have the same layout
with the similar amount of open space of 4.67 acres. The following open space table approved for the sDP
notes that the preserve, green space, sidewalk, & pool deck are included in the open space table.
f
USABU OPEH SPACE REQUIREMENT PER LDC 1.08.02
MIX UsE l]m
4,67 50,}6
TOTAL PROVIDEDT 4.67 6e/6
r ( PRESERVE+GRE EN 5 PA CE+SI DEWALK+0E66171 r. 79 AC)
Since the plat layout is essentially the same as the SDP, the open space required and provided will be
exactly the same 4.67 acres when the sidewalks and green space within the private platted rights-of-way
are included. See Exhibit E which depicts the open space elements that are within the platted rights-of-way
COMPLIANCE WITH LDC SECTION 10.02.13 E.
Based on the following findings, the request is not a substantial modification and may be processed as a
PUD lnsubstantial Change.
E. Changes and amendments. There are three types of changes to a PUD Ordinance: Substantial,
lnsubstantial, and Minor.
1. Substantial changes. Any substantial change(s) to an approved PUD Ordinance shall require the review
and recommendation of the Planning Commission and approval by the Board of County Commissioners as a
PUD amendment prior to implementation. Applicants shall be required to submit and process a new
application complete with pertinent supporting data, as set forth in the Administrative Code. For the
purpose ofthis section, a substantial change shall be deemed to exist where:
a. A proposed change in the boundary of the pUD;
The request does not include a change in the boundary of the pUD.
I
I
I)
i)
I
/+.H/4\/6\
AC
TOTAL REQUTRED {7,79 AC X 0.5)
3.B.k
Packet Pg. 117 Attachment: Attachment J - Application-Backup Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
b. A proposed increase in the total number of dwelling units or intensity of land use or height of buildings
within the development;
c. A proposed decrease in preservation, conservation, recreation, or open space areas within the
development not to exceed 5 percent of the total acreage previously designated as such, or 5 acres in area;
The request does not change the preservation, conservation, recreation, or open space areas.
d. A proposed increase in the size of areas used for nonresidential uses, to include institutional, commercial,
and industrial land uses (excluding preservation, conservation, or open spaces), or a proposed relocation of
nonresidential Iand uses;
The request will not modify any existing uses or intensities that would impact surrounding Iand uses or
that would be incompatible. All committed perimeter buffers and setbacks remain the same. The
conservation area (preserve) has been recorded in OR Book 5605 Page 1241 as part of the SDP approval.
e. A substantial increase in the impacts ofthe development which may include, but are not limited to,
increases in traffic generation; changes in traffic circulation; or impacts on other public facilities;
There are no changes that would increase the impacts previously assessed and addressed.
i A change that will result in land use activities that generate a higher level of vehicular traffic based upon
the Trip Generation Manual published by the lnstitute of Transportation Engineers;
The request does not change the approved land uses and nor will it generate additional traffic. Pursuant
to Ordinance No. 2015-24 the maximum trip teneration allowed by the proposed uses (both primary and
ancillary) may not exceed 33 PM Peak Hour, two way trips. This commitment will not change.
g. A change that will result in a requirement for increased stormwater retention, or will otherwise increase
stormwater discharges;
The request does not result in increased stormwater retention or increased stormwater discharges. The
stormwater volume as permitted by the SFWMD and the SDP will remain the same.
h. A change that will bring about a relationship to an abutting land use that would be incompatible with an
adjacent land use;
The request to reduce internal setbacks does not create an incompatibility with, or negatively impact,
adjacent land uses. The development will still meet the required perimeter setbacks and buffering
requirements.
i. Any modification to the PUD master plan or PUD document or amendment to a PUD ordinance which is
inconsistent with the Future Land Use Element or other element of the Growth Management plan or which
modification would increase the density or intensity of the permitted land uses;
No, the request will not generate a higher level of vehicular traffic. There is no change to the approved
48 residential units and development commitments pursuant to Ordinance No, 16-24.
3.B.k
Packet Pg. 118 Attachment: Attachment J - Application-Backup Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
There are no changes that would create an inconsistency with the Growth Management plan.
j. The proposed change is to a PUD district designated as a development of regional impact (DRI) and
approved pursuant to F.S. S 380.06, where such change requires a determination and public hearing by
Collier County pursuant to F.S. 5 380.06(19). Any change that meets the criterion of F.S. 5 380.06(19)(e)2,
and any changes to a DRI/PUD master plan that clearly do not create a substantial deviation shall be
reviewed and approved by Collier County under this LDC section 10.02.13; or
The request is not located within a DRl.
k. Any modification in the PUD master plan or PUD document or amendment to a PUD ordinance which
impact(s) any consideration deemed to be a substantial modification as described under this LDC section
10.02.13.
There are no substantial modifications as noted above.
CONCLUSION
This petition provides development regulations for a platted Townhouse development by establishing
specific development standards for this typ€ of residential product. ln addition, a deviation requested for the
open space requirement is necessary to address a conflict between the definition of useable open space and
the reBulations for a platted development. The Townhouse Plat Plan (See Exhibit B.) proposes the same land
use coverage as the approved Site Development Plan (See Exhibit C.), which provides 60% open space. The
deviation is requested to document that the sidewalks and open space elements within the private platted
rights-of-way are included in the useable open space calculation on the Townhouse Site Plan.
3.B.k
Packet Pg. 119 Attachment: Attachment J - Application-Backup Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
239.597.311 1
FBPR:31200
FDACS:188416
www.LJA.com
7400 Trail Blvd. Suite 200, Naples, Florida 34108
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
ALL THAT PART SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COTINTY, FLORIDA,
BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 16;
THENCE S 89'l 8'5 1 ', E ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE
SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION I6 A DISTANCE OF 67.00 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION
WITH THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SANTA BARBARA BOULEVARD (R.O.W. VARTES);
THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTH LINE N OOOIO'IO'' E ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE A
DISTANCE OF 3O.OO FEET TO TTM POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL TMREIN BEING
DESCRIBED;
THENCE CONTINUING AIONG SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE N OOOIO'IO' E A DISTANCE OF 604.49
FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH TriE SOUTH RrGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF ADKINS AVENUE (60'
R.O.W.);
THENCE S 89'20'16'' E ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 560.75 FEET TO AN
INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SLINSET BOULEVARD (60' R.O.W.);
THENCE S OOOO3'32'W ALONG SAID WEST zuGHT-OF-WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 604.73 FEET TO AN
INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF pOLLy AVENUE (60' R.O.W.);
THENCE N 89" I 8'5 I '' W ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT.OF-WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 56I .92 FEET TO
THE POINT OF BEGINMNG OF THE PARCEL HEREIN DESCzuBED.
CONTAINING A TOTAL AREA OF APPROXIMATELY 7.79 ACRES
REF. LJA DWG #I3763-PLAT
3.B.k
Packet Pg. 120 Attachment: Attachment J - Application-Backup Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
INSTR 6500502 oR 6323 PG 3983 E-RECoRDED L/24/2O24 4:33 pM PAGES 3
CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT AND COMPTROLLER, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA
Doc@.70 $35,540.00 REc $27.00
coNs $5,220,000-00
Proparcd Bv:
Craig M. Domg Esq.
Cnig M, Dome, PA.
2655 S. Lc Jeunc Rd PH 2C
Coral Gables, FL 33134
After Rccordine Retum To;
Jacob H. Piomrar; Esq.
Akcrman LLP
98 Soulheast Seventh Str€et
SuiG tl00
Miami, FL 33131
Above This Line For Recording I)efa'l
(Whenever
individuals,
THIS SPECIAL
limited liability company
Hallandale Beach, FL 33009, aud
called the "GIAntee"), whose post office
used hcroin tbc terms "Grantor{ and
and lhe successors and assigns of
That the Gruutor, for and in consideration
valuable consideration, to the Grantor in hand paid
acknowledged, has granted, bargainod, sold and
the Grantee, and the Grantee's successors and assigns
being in Collier County, Florida, to-wit;
ecial'Warranty Deed
is marle this 23'd day of January,2024,by POLLY AVE, LLC, a Florida
"-GrA$oI'), whose post office address is 800 SE 4th Avenuo, Suite 704,
VILLAS, LLC, a Florida timited liability company @ereinafter
NW Executive Center Drive, Suite 370, Boca Raton, FL33431
tho parties to this instrument and thc heirs, legal reprcsentatives, and assigns of
and other entities.)
AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($10.00), and other good and
Condominlum Unit Nos. 101, I02, I03, 104, 105, 106,
303,304, 401,402,403,404,405, 406 4A7 r 408,501, 502,
AND
605, 606, 701, 702, 703, 704, 801, 802, 803, 804, of
CONDOMINfUM, according to the Declaration of
O,R. Book 5608, Page 1943, and all exhibits and
County, Florida.
NI<IA
Parcel One:
The East Yt of the Southrvest % of the Southwest % of the Northrvest % of
South, Range 26 East, less the North 30 X'eet, the East 30 Feet and the South
County, Florida,
the receipt and sulEcienoy of which are hereby
presents does grant batgain, sell and transfer unto
described land (the "&sper1y"), sifuate, lying and
202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 301, 302,
506, 507, 508, 601, 602, 603,604,
TOWNIIOME VILLAS, A
recorded March 18,2019 in
Public Records of Collier
Torvnship 50
Collier
Parcel Two:
The West Yz of. tb,e Southrvest % of the Southwest % oI the Northvest % of Section 16, Torvnship 50
South, Range 26 East, Ie.ss the North 30 Feet and the South 30 X'eet, Collier County, f,'lor.itla.
Parcel Identification Number: 64637000024;64631000040; 64637000066; 64537000087; 64637000105;
64637000127; 64637000141;64637000163; 64637000189; 64631000202i 64637000228; 64637000244i
64637000260; 64$7A00286i 64637000309; 64637000325; 64637000341; 64637000367i 64637000383;
64637000422; 64637000448i 64637000464;64637000480; 64637000503; 64637000529i 64637000545;
64637000561i 6C637000587; 64637000600; 64631000626; 64637000642i 64637000668; 64637000684;
64637000701; 64$7A00723; 64637000749; 64637000765t 64637000781; 64637000804;64637000820;
{nta nrCam llnn I Ft. A?Q1 2 aQA -h.7el.l-4e,1 ?_haoA _Oapp,,4,oL2 1 Ap,\
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
3.B.k
Packet Pg. 121 Attachment: Attachment J - Application-Backup Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
oR 6323 PG 3984
64$70A0846i 64637000862; 64637000888; 64537000901;
64637000969; and 64637000406
64637000927; 64$7A00943i
TOGETHER WITII all t[e tenements, hereditamonts aBd apputenances, with every privilege, right, title, interest
and estate, reversion, remainder and easementthereto belonging or iu anywise appertaining,
TOHAVE HOLD the same in fee simple forever.
SUBJECT reservations and easements of record, if any, and only to the extent that the same may
this reference, reimposing same, (2) taxes for the year 2024 and subsequentyears, whichstill be in force and
aro not yet due and Order of the Collier County Code Enforcement Board (the "Board") recot'ded on
Public Records ofCollier County, Florida, aud (4) that oertain Order ofthe BoardMay23,2A22n ORB 6130,
recorded on March 77, 2023 n PG 912 in the Public Records of Collier County, Florida,
AND the Grantor hereby the Grantee tha! except as to those matters speciffed above, at the time of
the delivery of this dee4 the from all encumbrances made by the Grantor; the Grantor.is lawfully seized of
the Property in fee simple; thatthe good right and lawfuI authority to sell and coavey the ProPerfy; that the Grantor
hereby fi.rlly waffants the title to the
through or undet the Grantor.
defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons claiming by,
on the Followiug Pagel
.r.,..t.
Vnta nr(la m l.tnn I l-t, /. ?e 1 2neA_h7e0-de,l 2-he oA -O o aA.la 12 1 AA E,
Special Wananty Deed- pagc 2
rl
3.B.k
Packet Pg. 122 Attachment: Attachment J - Application-Backup Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
*** oR 6323 PG 3gg5 ***
[Sipatue Page to Special V/arranty Deed]
IN WITNESS WIIEREOF, the Grautor has hereuuto set the Grantor's hand and seal the day and year fust above
written.
Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence:
PoLLY AvE, LLC, a Florida limited liability company
Wifness
Printed
P.O. Addess:
P.O. Address:
t36O P"st Oat< e|vd. S
ST-{TE OI'\'IRCINL,1.
COL}TY OT RO.{TOi{E
The foregoing instnunent was aclanowledged before me
day of Jauuary, 2024 by Victor G. Bazzano Ambrosoni,
behalf of the company, who [_] is personally knowa or
[Seal]
sy: iltblor O. fuzzzza,4nlrusoru
Victor G. Binaro Ambrosoni, Manager
physical presence or gl2online notarization, this 23
Ave, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, otr
as identification.
Uruguay I dentification
,9tate Of
I'arfle: P&flessa
,{ct*g,ir tlte
-|Il' (orrrnlssbn Er?:--
using 2-nal Audiof ideo
VANESSA PAIZ
Electronlc Notary Publlc
Commonwealth of Virglnia
Reglstratlon No. 7783998
My Commlssion Expires Jun 30, 2026
\l^ta n/(l. m l-lnn I lt. aae 1 2 nq{-h,7e0_4e 1 2_haeA _lrnaRA aA7 1 AR 4
Spccial Wananty Dced - Page 3
Roanoke
3.B.k
Packet Pg. 123 Attachment: Attachment J - Application-Backup Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
C-aunty
Growth Management Community Development Department
2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104
Phone: (2391 252-L036 | Emai!: G M DClientServices@col liercountyfl .gov
www,col liercou ntyf l.gov
PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM
This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification
Letters.
Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the
date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the
applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form.
Please complete the following, use additionalsheets if necessary.
a. lf the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in
common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the
perce of such interest
b. lf the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the
percen of stock owned each
c.lf the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the
perce of interest
Name and Address % of Ownership
Name and Address % of Ownership
Naples Preserve Villas, LLC 100%,
2385 NW Executive Center Drive, #370
Boca Raton, FL 33431
Persons with Equitable lnterest: Jeffrey E. Sobel and Samuel R. Sobel
Name and Address % of Ownership
oLl2023 Page 1 of 3
3.B.k
Packet Pg. 124 Attachment: Attachment J - Application-Backup Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
e
Growth Management Community Development Department
2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104
Phone: 12391 252-LO35 | Emai!: G M DC|ientServices@co| IiercountyfLgov
www.col liercou ntyfl.gov
d. lf the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the
ral an or limited rtners
lf there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation,
Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the
officers, stockhold beneficiaries, or a rtners:
Date of Contract:
f. lf any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or
officers, if a co rtnershi or trust:
g. Date subject property acquired 112312024
! teased: Term of lease years /months
lf, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following:
Name and Address % of Ownership
Name and Address % of Ownership
Name and Address
otl2023
Page 2 of 3
3.B.k
Packet Pg. 125 Attachment: Attachment J - Application-Backup Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
Crounty
Growth Management Community Development Department
2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, tlorida 34104
Phone: (239) 252-1036 | Email: GMDClientServices@colliercountyfl.gov
www.colliercountW,gov
Date option terminates: _, or
AFFIRM PROPERW OWNERSHIP INFORMATION
Any petition required to have Property Ownershlp Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form.
Requirements for petition types are located on the associated applicatlon form. Any change in ownership whether
individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest-holdlng party, must be dlsclosed to Collier County
immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition's final public hearing,
As the outhorized ogent/opplicont for this petition, I ottest thot oll ol the inlormation indicoted on this checklist is
included in this submittol pockoge. I understand thot foilure to include oll necessory submittol inJormdtion moy
result in the deloy of processing this petition.
*The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to:
Growth Management Community Development Department I GMD Portal:
https://cvportal.col liercountyf l.gov/cityviewweb
Questions? Email: GM Dclientservices@colliercountyfl .gov
Naples Preserve Villas, LLC
By f/>-t f z't?
Age nt/Owner Signature Date
Tz,$o sAp/oie
Atent/Owner Name (please print)
otl2023 Page 3 of 3
Date of option: _
Anticipated closing date: _
3.B.k
Packet Pg. 126 Attachment: Attachment J - Application-Backup Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
2024 FLORIDA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY ANNUAL REPORT
DOCU MENT# L23OOO538OB4
Entity Name: NAPLES PRESERVE VILLAS, LLC
Current Principal Place of Business:
2385 NW EXECUTIVE CENTER DR
STE 370
BOCA RATON, FL 33431
FILED
Apr 25, 2024
Secretary of State
50668'17180CC
Current Mailing Address:
2385 NW EXECUTIVE CENTER DR
STE 370
BOCA RATON, FL 33431 US
FEI Number:93-4761162
Name and Address of Current Registered Agent:
SOBEL, JEFFREY E
2385 NW EXECUTIVE CENTER DR
STE 370
BOCA RATON, FL 33431 US
Certificate of Status Desired: No
Electronic Signature of Registered Agent
Authorized Person(s) Detail :
Title AUTHORIZED MEMBER
Name SOBEL, JEFFREY E
Address 2385 NW EXECUTIVE CENTER DR
STE 370
City-State-Zip: BOCA RATON FL 33431
Date
Title
Name
Address
City-State-Zip:
AUTHORIZED MEMBER
SOBEL, SAMUEL R
2385 NW EXECUTIVE CENTER DR
sTE 370
BOCA RATON FL 3343,1
Title
Name
Address
City-State-Zip:
AUTHORIZED MEMBER
NAPLES PRESERVE VILLAS
DEVELOPMENT LLC
2385 NW EXECUTIVE CENTER DR
STE 370
BOCA RATON FL 33431
that my name appeas above, or on an attachment with all other like empowered,
SIGNATURE: JEFFREY E. SOBEL AUTHORIZED MEMBER 0412512024
Electronic Signature of Signing Authorized person(s) Detail Date
The above named entity submits this statement for the purpose of changing rts registered office or registered agent, or both, in the State of Florida.
SIGNATURE:
3.B.k
Packet Pg. 127 Attachment: Attachment J - Application-Backup Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
Naples Preserve Villas, LtC
2385 NW Executive Center Drive
Suite 370
Boca Raton, FL, 33431
Main Line (551) 994-3434
Letter oI Authorization
Naples Preserve Villas, LLC
Whose Address is:
2385 NW Executive Center Drive
Suite 370
Boca Raton, Fl- 33431
Hereby designates:
Tlrso San Jose
2385 NW Executive Center Drive
Suite 370
Boca Raton, Fl- 33431
To act on behalf of Naples Preserve Villas, LLC for the purpose of submitting any application needed for permitting, zoning or
construction contracts on property located at:
ParcelOne:
The East 1/2 ofthe Southwest ,4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Sectlon 16, Township 50 South, Range 26 East,
Less the North 30 Feet, the East 30 Feet and the South 30 Feetthereof, Collier County, Florida.
AND
ParcelTwo:
The West V2 ofthe Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest V4 of the Northwest V4 of Section 15, Township 50 South, Range 26
East, lessthe North 30 Feet and the South 30 Feet, Collier County, Florida,
Parcel lD# of 528080 1015816, Containlng approximately 8.7 total acres (378,972 Square feet) of land zoned mu ltifamily around
address 5950 Onyx Clr, Naples, Fl- 34112
More commonly known as:
Naples Preserve Villas, LLC
By:
Jeffrey E. sobel
Its: Member
N S SIGNA Owner or re
Name (Printe
Personally Kn or Produced ldentification_
v RE as to Fet,
,--ffi EVAN YNFANTE
Not.rv Pulillc-Sl.ta o( Florld.
co;milslon I HH 61603
Erpirr!
2021
0mc SSrOnml
o8N
?
of ldentification P.oduced_
3.B.k
Packet Pg. 128 Attachment: Attachment J - Application-Backup Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION
/ l{r7>-s,(print name), as
FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S}
-
PL202400041t6
(title, if
lfa licable), swear or affirm
and that
t,Z
applicable) of
under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner applicant
{,-J
(company,
ct purchase
I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on
the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the county in accordance with this
applicatjon and the Land Development Gode;
All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter
attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true;
I have authorized the statf of Colljer County to enter upon the property during normal working hours
for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this applicationi and that
The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and
restrictions imposed by the approved action
We/l authorize LJA Engineering, Inc.to act as our/my representative
in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above.
*Notes:
. lf the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres. or v. pres.. lf the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should
typically be signed by the Company's 'Managing Member.". lf the applicant is a painership, then typically a painer can sign on behalf of the paftnership.. lf the aPplicant is a limited partnership, then the general paftner must sign and be identified as the 'general
paftnef' of the named painership.
. ff the applicant is a trust then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee".. ln each instance, first determine the applicant's stafus, e.g., individual, corponte, trust, partnership, and then
use tho appropriate format tor that ownership.
Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that
the facts stated in it true.
Signature
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF COLLIER
2
4
5
\
The foregoing inslrument was acknowleged before me by means of flfphys?O 6.t s1 APRZL ,20!1, iy (prinrea n"." ot o*n", o, firit,"4
ical presence or Eonline notarization thisf Zrcs " .fa ". 7ct1'6
Notary Signature
Commis!ion ErPirss
EVA NY
bllc-
NTA EFN
d.Fttt6 loriofsuNotr
6 360HHtm!oomc
cP\08-coa-00115\l5s
REV 3/41020
ot//3o/Zattt
Da/e
Such person(s) Notary Public must check applicable box:
El Are personally known lo me
I Has produced a current drivers license
E Has produced _ as identirication.
/l
3.B.k
Packet Pg. 129 Attachment: Attachment J - Application-Backup Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
PL20240004116
Naples Preserve Villas, IIC
2385 NW Executive Center Drive
Suite 370
Boca Raton, F1,33431
Main Line (561) 994-3434
Letter of Authorization
Naples Preserve Villas, LLC
Whose Address is:
2385 NW Executive Center Drive
Suite 370
Boca Raton, Fl.33431
Hereby designates:
Tirso San Jose
2385 NW Executive Center Drive
Suite 370
Boca Raton, FL,33431
To act on beha lf of Naples Preserve Villas, LLC for the purpose of submitting a ny application needed for permitting zoning or
construction contracts on property located at:
Parcel One:
The East 7/2 ol the Southwest 7/4 of the Southwest L/4 ol the Northwest 1/4 of Section 16, Township 50 South, Range 26 East,
Less the North 30 Feet, the East 30 Feet and the South 30 Feet thereof, Collier County, Florida.
AND
Parcel Two:
The West V2 of the Southwest t/4 of the Southwest 7/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 15, Township 50 South, Range 26
East, less the North 30 Feet and the South 30 Feet, Collier County, Florida.
Parcel lD# of 528080 1015816, Containing approximately 8.7 total acres (378,972 Square feet) of land zoned multifamily around
address 5950 Onyx Cir, Naples, FL,34L12
More commonly known as:
Naples Preserve Villas, LLC
Signed this 11th
limited
By:
Jeffrey E. Sobel
Its: Member
?
NOT{RY'S RE as to Owner orVAt{
or Produced I dentif ication_
re
Name
Personally
of ldentification Produced_
)
3.B.k
Packet Pg. 130 Attachment: Attachment J - Application-Backup Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
c,ffi*Covmty
Public Utilities Department
Engineering & Project Management DivisionAptil L2,2024
Kyle Poorman
Land Development
7400 Trail Blvd., Suite 200
Naples, FL 34108
Su bject:
Project:
Parcel #:
VIA: E-MAIL
kpoorman @ lja.com
Water and Wastewater Service Availability
Na ples Preserve Villas
64537000959
Dear Kyle:
The subject project is in the service areas of the Collier County Water-Sewer District's (CCWSD) regional potable
water system and South Collier Water Reclamation Facility. Connection to the CCWSD's water distribution and
wastewater collection systems will be permitted only after the GMD Development Review Division's approval
of hydraulic calculations prepared by the Developer's Engineer of Record in accordance with the Design Criteria
found in Section 1 of the Collier County Water-Sewer District Utilities Standards Manual. Adequate capacity to
this project is not guaranteed until the project receives a commitment for service.
Water service is available to the site via a 10" PVC water line running along Santa Barbara BLVD and 8" pVC
along the north side of Adkins Ave. Potable water is available for domestic use, fire protection, and irrigation,
subiect to the provisions of LDC 4.03.08 C, the Collier County lrrigation Ordinance l2OL5-77],, and other
applicable rules and regulations. Potablewatersourcepressureshallbeverifiedbytheresultsof afireflowtest
not older than six months, in accordance with subsection 2.2.1, paragraph A.
Wastewater service is available to the site via 30" PVC force main running along the north side of Polly Ave.
Please contact the Wastewater Engineering Section (WasteWaterEngineerinq@colliercountvfl.gov) to confirm
downstream wastewater transmission system capacity and force main connection pressure.
A preliminary utility plan must be reviewed and discussed at a pre-submittal conference with representatives
of the Public Utilities Department and the Growth Management Department, as required by Sec. 134-58,
paragraph (bX2) of the Code of Ordinances. This conference may be conducted by email at the discretion of the
Public Utilities Department. Please contact Joanna Nicholson (Joanna. N icholson@colliercountvfl.eov) for
assistance with this requ irement.
Ptl'b uflibs ErqnesirE & Prcied lllaEgelrE{Il Dil/tul ' 3339 TamEmi rrail East. suile 303 . Naptes, Fto nda u112-5&1 Q3g-2524285 , FiU.23g-252-5378
3.B.k
Packet Pg. 131 Attachment: Attachment J - Application-Backup Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
See the attached GIS screenshot for approximate utility locations. Record drawings for CCWSD utility
infrastructure can be requested by emailing Utility Planning (UtilitvPlannins lliercou ntvfl.sov).
Respectfully,
Va rg a s C 9:?t:['"il',1:"",
Iaudia ?ii;;','i!;ffi;i;
Claudia Vargas
Pu blic Utilities Department
Operations Support Specialist ll, Engineering and Project Management
CC Howard Brogdon, Division Director, PUD/WD; Robert Von Holle, Division Director, pUD/WWD; Matthew
Mclean, Division Director, PUD/EPMD; Joe Bellone, Division Director, pUD/FOSD; Craig pajer, Division
Director, PUD/SRU; Ben Bullert, Supervisor Project Manager (Licensed) - Water, pUD/EpMD; Shon
Fandrich, Supervisor Project Manager (Licensed) - Wastewater, pUD/EpMD; Brett Rosenblum,
Supervisor Project Manager (Licensed), GMD/DRD; Joanna Nicholson, Site plans Reviewer , GMD/DRD;
Utility Pla nning Section
3.B.k
Packet Pg. 132 Attachment: Attachment J - Application-Backup Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
G lS Screenshot (Overview)
A-\5 I
I I
!
+
l]
5975
5927
5950
5963
595 1
I
- J_' -Ln--.i
Ill
.I
3.B.k
Packet Pg. 133 Attachment: Attachment J - Application-Backup Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
GIS Screenshot (Water Connection)
I
e
o IL
,,59?5
5527
I
595 1
oz
+
597 5
wS, 5iamrratE_O03so79
1
T
-l*
-.-Y 5963
E
5990
5950
3.B.k
Packet Pg. 134 Attachment: Attachment J - Application-Backup Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
GIS Screenshot (Wastewater Con nection )
ssMan I
LJ vtLVJ64Ai,i&= !II
vc
'qq
-------I
f
=-
3.B.k
Packet Pg. 135 Attachment: Attachment J - Application-Backup Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
ONYX RPUD PDI
J ustifications for Deviations
Deviations 1-3 No Changes
Deviation 4: A deviation from LDC Section 4.07 .02.G.L, Open space
requirements, which requires Residential PUD districts to provide a minimum of
60% useable open space to allow 40% useable open space.
Justification:
As stated, the Applicant is requesting a deviation from the 60% open space
requirement to allow 40% open space to address the conflict created by the
platting regulations and with the definition of useable open space.
The LDC definition of useable open space:
Open spoce, usoble: Active or possive recreotion oreos such as parks, ploygrounds,
tennis courts, golf courses, beach frontoge, woterwoys, lokes, lagoons,
floodploins, noture troils ond other similor open spoces. usable open spoce oreos
sholl olso include those portions of areas set oside for preservation of notive
vegetotion, required yards (setbocks) ond londscaped oreos, which ore occessible
to and usable by residents of on individual lot, the development, or the general
public. Open woter oreo beyond the perimeter of the site, street rights-of-way,
drivewoys, off-street porking ond loading oreas, shall not be counted towords
required Usoble Open Space.
This last sentence is what creates the conflict. The platting ofthe project results
in privately owned street rights-of-way that coincides with the platted residential
unit's lot lines. The sidewalks and some of the gree n space/la ndsca pe areas are
located within the platted rights of way. These elements were included in the
open space calculations on the SDP. This request is to simply allow the same
elements to be included in the useable open space calculations on the
Townhouse Site Plan and Plat. Exhibit B - Draft Plat Plan depicts this scenario. The
approved SDP P120190002911 -Exhibit C and the Draft plat plan have the same
layout with the similar amount of open space of 4.67 acres. The following open
space table approved for the SDP notes that the preserve, green space, sidewalk,
& pool deck are included in the open space table.
Onyx RPUD Ordinance No. 16-24 - Insubstantial Change to a pUD (pDl) qL2O24OOO4:I16
Last Revised June 5, 2024
3.B.k
Packet Pg. 136 Attachment: Attachment J - Application-Backup Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
USABTT OPEH SPACE REQUIREMENT PER LDC LO8,O2
MIX USE AC otto
ToTAL REQUTRED (7.79 AC X 0.6)4.67 6tr/6
TOTAL PROVIDEDI'4,67 6tr/6
r ( PRESERVE+GREEN SPACE+SI DEWALK+DECK)/( 7,79 AC)
A
Since the plat layout is essentially the same as the SDP, the open space required
and provided will be exactly the same 4.67 acres when the sidewalks and green
space within the private platted rights-of-way are included. See Exhibit E which
depicts the open space elements that are within the platted rights-of-way.
Onyx RPUD Ordinance No. 16-24 - Insubstantial Change to a PUD (pDD pL20240004116
Last Revised June 5,2024
3.B.k
Packet Pg. 137 Attachment: Attachment J - Application-Backup Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
:R
E:T
o;6
E}
t3
I
68
o {
e
zo
zI{
!d
o
2kt.5
SHIR 01
0l
&
ot i
TalLg:_-_:_:
I
EXHIBIT E . OPEN SPACE DEVIATION I
+_
I
I
I.EGEND:
tlr
Londscoped Areos
(Useoble Open Spoce)
Sidewolks
(Useoble Open Spoce)
59 R.O.W
50 LOW
5d 8.OW
lIt
I
.t
,:l-i ,'l
-i,:ll-r t l_-l_J--t
I
I
.t
L
, . t,
{.t-
I
t
I it
z.;
t
t-
t
I
:l
I
I
{
t
I
r-l
=--rt +
= .l- ilr
-2-l
-Jlr
I
I
I
t
,t
E
23{lr (oNfr)
3.B.k
Packet Pg. 138 Attachment: Attachment J - Application-Backup Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
- soBEL FUND tV LLc lr"*"h ^Lr suwrY* ltu()M1ffiIVLU8 T M* lldd! lL.@atMtEiL.^
n
t
-HM*:.-ffiffi
--
-
16-
sozs'ES
p
I ---IEM 9CW*RVANN EA$MENII A@K 5605 PAG 1211
FH
$x
9d
3B
-
E;
HU
s1.92'(C)
CWNft RM*$TANN
SYMAOLS LECEND
o - Fm !A' no @/cp
a-FmxiILlog
o. Fm ffiE ra*rt
. - sI 5A'm mrcP
fl-&amAI
-_wmtEm
X- l E VAE
--Sa-ffiI&G
a-srwM
B . U(M UNUfr SM UP
a'4ffi
m ' UcEc er
-m--@saM
VICINITY MAP
CMER
0v
N$.f*nr/.6E$r/1aEw'4, Eqr.,reu€
RAN. ruAN OINHR 8W 5/6t PG t67J OAVO ANO AAREARA L
BALLAROI BW tt26 Pe 2217
I nal Pmr gcns 16, Totgrp & sB,
2a E SI C(raR @Nry RffDl, aEftC rmEPMNOffLY EffiEO S Ffuffi
_trc M_, ffis ucm6 uE
BIS BfuNOARY SRWY NEEE BE STAIOTROS T PRACNCE SEI Fff} BY N€
FLCTDA BOARo g LANO $f,EyffiS il qfTEn 5J-17, fufilD^ lorNtSR nEcor, PURgNT r0 *cns.r7.o7r, F-@DA sr tuEs
hrs adiDffy 9aEy 15 Nor v&o sroI re ga^w sD ftE mo(agAL S H€ tr60^ sGM gRWU A0 !ffi. mrnfiS q EEnilSrc IREY vE m ntmE 0y oBn BA nE gN{C p*n€s s@t n€mftx 6$xr c DE sdr6 pmry m pfnEs E md&m gy qApBil-t, RffioA efismlnf ffi.
BIS BONDARY $R[Y IS CERNFED AS IO HE DAE S FIEO SRWi NOT
I
I
N
A
I'p
qI
lB
ss;8
c'gu.
8**
$HE
dH
$s:
BA6 CdiXUTNO ALCC sro EASr ftSr-f-wly urEN @1dld E A DISTAW ff 5O'4C FEEI rc ANINES'Nq {B ftE S@N RHI-tr-WAY U{E GqrNs
^ENU[
(60 RO.s)iilENd S !9701r'E ALSC SAD Ufr Rrer S-*Ay
TNE A OSING tr $O,75 FEI IO AN IiEXgCNilsfr E fsr irdt-6-u^r uNt s $NsTBOUV& (ao',RO.X):
frENE S @rJ?' ' {SC STM A OSIANG q @,7J FET
'O
A ilERgCNd,D 1 ffirH RCH| O -I^r UNt O PGLY A[ruF
ti;Et)!r."0,'w
^LoNc
sxD Nnfr *sr-s-r^y
LrM A Orsrde s $1a2 fEt rc ilE Porr s
AEONNIIC 6 BE PMEI AEREIN OE$RIBEO,
cilTAMNC l ror^t el s ApmoxuAELy ,.x AGEq
.€. - ACGSS fAStENtT.l€. = EYPffiARY A@$ EAtrYtflL
D.E. . MANAC EASUENTl.E. - LldnNO EAsxENr
rL,E, - ffiAiY LNDSCAPI EASU'NI.
U.E. - UNUP EASEIENI
a. E&i6 lE @NlEs e€ A SD S B€ [mA SIr[ RAt ffiD.E^sr adr, 0^0 ^or:ilEftr.5. ACCCDING IO ftOERAL EM€RENCY HANAGIENI AEICY!25rS, rlm TNSURANe R^t MAp NIIBER t202lc,$MIX H, OAI OF FIRX INDET IAY I€, 2012, frE SUMCT PREERft LES NzN $. sn l alg [@ ELEv^nd 6 t.
Ar frt nrE tr E9n6 s Hrs sEt nB aEy^ fiFrunoHM ftOI MIN SUATIIE TO frE LEI EU MG^LSnI L@ Al @O[S m m frrA eB6rB RECmNC BEvtDn ANo $FAO!*CY S ffrS Erl OrTA. BER mMff $OD *
BTAINED PRIS IO ruLYNC OT N6 OATA, CNTACI fuB CONTY GROWil
!,i$ryi!lr3.iafl!:!j: 2m N. ffisE$G DirE. raPrs. nmo^ J4ro..
nrs lRwY w s PruPAR@ sn H mEFrr tr A nu c*rrilE{r reaRED
BY 40 @U&C NAnq[ nU fi$RrNG frpNi ryrrffEXr f,u*oml4a77r. durilENr oaE trffi [. 202J. hq ftE sGtoult t-n. ffEltuosxc EtGPnils &E gm ao oENnoo d frls $REy 3. 9-torxePnss 1-5. 7-6 Bofl fficr aur {t aoI tuonr& BLMI N NArunreD r-r2 AiE NOI PLOftA8E.
CERNNEO rc: SEL ruNO V, LLCI dO REfuBLIC NANO& NtrE IN$RANC
cilPANY. NAPUS PftSW VtrAa [C, A tlffro^ Lryttro L[AuTyC*NYi CRrE r. mlE. P.A.r XAUAN [P
HS rS TO @nF! hAt HS tp O Ut S0 nE Mf,y d s0 rT rsaAsD ffi x& il Am^E tfi fft Mt rrtw sTAom dTeft&naaE m [t^Ags t& [M $REE Eity 6r&$0 N@Eo ay &rr aD f,$i riD r@Es rErs r-{ {d, (Dn. {d. C r,r!, ra ra a0 E f t & A fift6 BE nEoffi XAs cmfrO C
orE tr 4Ar fi rp: xNUeY 12, 202a:s.dr"*
ewnhil4ffiHffir
:t.
F
POLLY AVENUE 60'
--r
@ 80u 620t
2022 LLC
PC 2J52
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
+
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
B
0
d
\
U
h-
I
I
I (r.re NE eB)t
)
sl
I
.l
I
I
l
t
t
I
I
I
(I
Tl
l\
FEETsWH JO FEEI ANO hE ftSf 67'd H€REff, cquER @Nft. 4@IoA.
r,9 r
\::
J. tfv nGs & arso d NAW olrur.
3.B.k
Packet Pg. 139 Attachment: Attachment J - Application-Backup Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
EXHIBIT E
DEVIATIONS:
Nothing in this PUD Document shall approve a deviation to the LDC unless it is listed in this
Exhibit E.
1. A deviation from LDC Section 6.06.02. A.2 which requires that a S-foot wide sidewalk be
provided on both sides of public and private rights-of-way or easements which are internal to
the site, to instead provide a S-foot wide sidewalk on one side of the private right-of-way as
depicted in the master plan (Exhibit C). The sidewalk may only be omitted on one side of a
street which is immediately adjacent to the rear of the structures and where no driveway
accesses are provided. When residential units front on or have driveway access to both
sides of a street, sidewalks shall be provided on both sides of the right of way. Where the
sidewalk is omitted, the owner shall installType D landscape material in its place. A
landscape buffer easement is not required for these plantings.
2. A deviation from LDC Section 2.03.07 D.4.9 which requires, upon the issuance of approval
of a site development plan or subdivision plat that is part of a PUD or DRl, TDR credits and
TDR Bonus credits shall be redeemed at a rate proportionalto percentage of the PUD or
DRI's approved gross density that is derived through TOR credits and TOR Bonus credits, to
instead permit the developer to construct all units from base density (35 units) before
requiring application of TDR credits.
3. A deviation from LDC Section 6.06.01.N which establishes the minimum right-of-way width
of 60 feet be utilized, to instead establish that all internal roadways, if platted, may be
reduced to a 50 foot right-of-way configuration in accordance with the right- of-way cross
section attached to the l/aster Plan Exhibit C.
4.A deviation from LDC Section 4.07.02.G.1. Ooen sDace reouirements.which requires Residential
PUD districts to provide a minimum of 60% u ble open space to allow 40% useable open
space.
Onyx RPUD Ordinance No. 1 6-24 - Insubstantial Change to a PUD (PDI) PL202400041 1 6
Last Revised ltne 5,2024
Words underlined are added.
3.B.k
Packet Pg. 140 Attachment: Attachment J - Application-Backup Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
EXHIBIT B DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS:
Table I below sets forth the development standards for Single-Family and tr/ulti-Family Residential land
uses within the proposed Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD). Standards not specifically set
forth within this application shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the
date of approval of the SDP or Subdivision plat.
TABLE I -RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
M!tr+l+Adr{lt+
DWEttING &
TEWNHEUSE
(R)
TOWNHOUSE
LRl
SINGLE-FAMILY
DWELLING/
ZERO LOT LINE
(R)
AMENIry
CENTER
(AC)
ACCESSORY
STRUCTURES
MINIMUM LOT AREA NIA 1.800 souare
feet
3,500 square feet N/A N/A
MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 6e-Feet 20 Feet 35 Feet N/A N/A
MINIMUM FLOOR AREA
OF BUILDINGS
f;+eO-s+are-
fee+{pe+++*)1.400 square
feet oer Unit
1,400 square feet 750 square
feet
N/A
MINIMUM BUILDING
SETBACK
(From Pollv Avenue)
TeJeet 70 feet 70 feet NA 35 feet
MINIMUM BUILDING
SETBACK
(From Sunset Avenue)
1€O-f€et 150 feet 150 feet 150 feet 150 feet
MINIMUM BUILDING
SETBACK
(From Santa Barbara
Avenue)
3etuet 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet
MINIMUM BUILDING
SETBACK
(From Adkins Ave ROW)
2eJeet 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet
Page 1 of 3
Revised July 15,2024
3.B.k
Packet Pg. 141 Attachment: Attachment J - Application-Backup Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
MUtI FNMTY
DWEItING &
TOWNHEUSE
a)
TOWNHOUSE
G)
SINGLE-FATUILY
DWELLING/
ZERO LOT LINE
(R)
AMENITY
CENTER (AC)
ACCESSORY
STRUCTURES
MINIMUM DISTANCE
BETWEEN STRUCTURES
Principal Structure
Accessory Structure
25{ee+
{Sfieet
20 feet
10 feet 12 leet
0 or 10 feet
N/A
10 feet
SPS
MINIMUM INTERNAL
SETBACKS
Front Yard
Side Yard
Rear Yard
2€Jee+
2e-fee+
2eJee+
20/6 feet
(2X5)
0/6 feet (4)
10 feet
20 feet
6 feet, or 0'on one
side and 12' on the
other
20 feet
2O 10 feet
10/15 feet(6)
2O 10 feet
SPS
Z0jeet
{9bet
20jee{
SETBACKS FROM
LANDSCAPE BUFFER
EASEMENT (L.B.E.) 13)
{-O{eet 10 feet
Perimeter
Buffer
0 feet
lnternal
Buffer
10 feet 4{I{ee+
10 feet
Perimeter
Buffer
0 feet
lntemal
Buffer
{4tue+
10 feet
Perimeter
Buffer
0 feet
lnternal
Buffer
PRESERVE SETBACK 25 feet 10 feet
MAXIMUM ZONED
HEIGHT
2-steries-&€5
feet 2 stories & 35
feet
2 stories & 35 feet 1 story & 25
feet 35 feet
MAXIMUM ACTUAL
HEIGHT
2-ste+ies*an
f€et 2 stories & 42
feet
2 stories & 42 feet 1 story & 25
feet 42feet
Page 2 of 3
Revised July 15,2024
3.B.k
Packet Pg. 142 Attachment: Attachment J - Application-Backup Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
Footnotes apply as noted M:
zurbed) er edge ef pavement (if net eurbed), This weuld apply te multi- family develepment traets that
2. Front yard setback from the back of sidewalk to the face of the garage door must be a minimum of 23
feet for internal private roads.
3.AllL.B.E.'sshallbeplaftedaSseparatetractsoreasementsonthePlat.
4. 0/6 side vard - Zero (0) ft. for shared walls and six (6) ft. for exterior side walls of the units from a lot line.
5. Lots that have more than one front vard mav reduce the front vard adiacent to the side of the structure that does
not have a drivewav. to six (6) ft. from a lot line.
6. Amenifu Center - A 15ft. setback is reouired onlv at the south orooertv line/tract line.
Page 3 of 3
Revised July 15,2024
3.B.k
Packet Pg. 143 Attachment: Attachment J - Application-Backup Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
Re:
239.597.3111
FBPE: 31 200
FDACS: LBB41 6
www.LJAcom
7400 Trail Blvd. Suite 200, Naples, Florida 34108
September 11,2024
The Intake Team
Collier County Growth Management Division
2800 North Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
Via E-Permitting
Onyx RPUD Ordinance No.16-24 - Insubstantial Change to a PUD (PDI)
PL20240004116
Neighborhood Information Meeting Compliance
Dear Intake Team
Attached to this cover letter are the following documents in accordance with Collier County's
Neighborhood Information Meeting requirements :
o Affidavit of Compliance
. Neighborhood Information Meeting Advertisement as shown inthe Naples Daily News. Neighborhood Information Meeting Property Owner Letterso Property Owner Mailing List
o Affidavit of Publication from the Naples Daily Newso Neighborhood Information Meeting Summaryo Neighborhood Information Meeting Sign-ln Sheeto PowerPoint Presentation (in PDF format)
o Recording of the Neighborhood Information Meeting (uploacled separately at an Mp|.file)
If you have any questions, you may reach me by telephone or email at memblidge@lja.com.
Sincerely,
LJA ENGINEERING,INC.
l4wgar6tmbl,idaet
Margaret E. Emblidge, AICP
Planning Director
MEB/drr
Enclosures
K:\2023tr3-0145 Santa Barbara Place Villas\Correspondences\DocumentsU.JIM (PDl)\Compliance\Cover Letter.docx
3.B.l
Packet Pg. 144 Attachment: Attachment K - NIM Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
Neighborhood lnformation Meeting Affidavit of Compliance
I hereby certifu that pursuant to Ordinance 200441, of the Collier County Land Development Code, I did
cause the attached newspaper advertisement to appe and I did give notice by mail to the following
property owners and/or condominium and civic associations whose memben may be affected by the
proposed land use changes of an application request for a rezoning, PUD amendment, or conditional use, at
least 15 days prior to the scheduled Neighborhood Information Meeting. For the purposes of this
requiremmt, the names and addresses of property otners shall be deemed those appearing on the latest tax
rolls of Collier Counly and any other persons or entities who have made a formal request of the
County to be noti,fied. The said notice contained the la)rmen's description of the site property of
proposed change and the date, time, and place of a Neighborhood Information Meeting.
Per the attached letters, property owner's list, and copy of newspaper advertisement which are hereby made
a part of this Affidavit of Compliance
(Signature of plicant)
STATE OF FLORI
The foregping in
tnt4daay ot
DA, COUNW OF COTTIER
strument was acknowledg
August ,2024,by
ed before me by means of
Margaret Emblidge
physical presence or !online registration
who is
as identification
ature o Nota Public
Denise R. Rakich
Print Name of Notary Public
or [has produced
J,
lgn
iffi:DEt{tsE R. MXrS
CdnnlsCor t Hll 2',lt0
ESl!! ffey 2{, ,()AC
Z personally known to me
3.B.l
Packet Pg. 145 Attachment: Attachment K - NIM Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
PETITION2 PL20240004116 - Onyx PDI (Insubstantial Change to PUD)
The public is invited to attend a neighborhood information meeting in person or via Zoom
held by Margaret Emblidge, AICP, of LJA Engineering, Inc.
Tuesday, September 10,2024, at 5:30 PM
Collier County - South Regional Library*
8065 Lely Cultural Parkway
Naples, FL 34113
*The Collier County Public Library does not sponsor or endorse this program.
Subject Property: Parcel No 00418680009
The property owner is petitioning Collier County to approve the revision of PUD Exhibit B, Table I, to specify
internal development standards for a platted townhouse development and request a deviation on the subject
property.
WE VALUE YOUR INPUT
Business and property owners, residents and visitors are welcome to attend the presentation, review project
materials and discuss the project with the owner and Collier County staff. If you are unable to attend this
meeting but have questions or comments, they can be directed by mail, phone or e-mail to:
Margaret Emblidge, AICP
LJA Engineering,Inc.
7400 Trail Boulevard, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34108
Telephone: (239) 597 -3Lll
Email: memblidge@LJA.com
Project
Location
\tlLinr.\\ [.
J
NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING
Zoom Meeting Link: https.,llljazoom.us/j/84846516060?pwd:LmhVttoyQEGYIzlLaEiTnAYnJk5XtN.l
Meting ID: 848 4651 6060
Passcode:988153
+
3.B.l
Packet Pg. 146 Attachment: Attachment K - NIM Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
239.597.31't1
FBPR:31200
FDACS:188416
www.LJA.com
7400 Trail Blvd. Suite 200, Naples, Florida 34108
Dear Property Owner:
Please be advised that a formal application has been submitted to Collier County seeking approval of an Insubstantial
Change to PUD under PL20240004116. The applicant is petitioning Collier County to approve the revision of PUD
Exhibit B, Table l, to specify internal development standards for a platted townhouse development and request a
deviation on the subject property.
In compliance with the Collier County Land Development Code requirements, a Neighborhood Information Meeting
will be held on Tuesday, September 1012024, at 5:30 pm at the Collier County South Regional Library, Meeting
Room B, 8065 Lely Cultural Parkway, Naples, FL 34113. (The Collier County Public Library does not sponsor
or endorse this program.)
Subject Property: Parcel No 00418680009
The subject property is located on the east side of Santa Barbara Boulevard abutting Adkins Avenue on the north and
Polly Avenue on the south.
The purpose and intent of this Neighborhood Information Meeting is to provide the public with notice of an
impending zoningapplication and to foster communication between the applicant and the public. The expectation is
that all attendees will conduct themselves in such a manner that their presence will not interfere with the orderly
progress of the meeting. At this meeting, the petitioner will explain the project in detail, record your input as an
interested neighbor and answer any questions you may have.
If you have any questions, comments or do not feel comfortable attending the meeting in person, you do have the
opportunity to participate virtually via an online Zoom meeting. Please note that remote participation is provided as
a courtesy and is at the user's risk. The petitioner and LJA Engineering are not responsible for technical issues. The
link and passcode for the online zoom meeting are shown below.
Zoom Meeting Link: https://lja.zoom.us/j 184846516060?pwd:LmhVttoyQEGYIzILaEiTnAYnJk5XtN.l
Meeting ID: 848 4651 6060
Passcode: 988153
LJA ENGINEERING,INC.
l,largardCml>l,idao
Margaret Emblidge, AICP
Planning Director
7400 Trail Boulevard, Suite 200
Naples, FL 34108
Telephone: (239) 597 -31 ll
Email: memblidge@lja.com
ProJect
Location
.il-
I
I
I
3.B.l
Packet Pg. 147 Attachment: Attachment K - NIM Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
Public Notices Public Notices
Naples Daily News - 0412212024
Yoll] Source
for the latest...
Your Source Your Source
Page:DIo
Public Notices
NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING
PETITION: PL20240004116 - Onyx PDI
(lnsubstantial Change to PUD)
The public is invited to attend a neighborhood information
meeting in person or via Zoom held by Margaret Emblidge,
AICB of LJA Engineering, lnc.
Tuesday, September 10,2024, at 5:30 PM
Collier County - South Regional Library*
8065 Lely Cultural Parkway
Naples, FL 341 13
.The Collier County Public Library does not sponsor
or endorse this program.
Subject Property: Parcel No 00418680009
Projecl
Location
td/
The property owner is petitioning Collier County to approve
the revision of PUD Exhibit B, Table l, to specify internal
development standards for a platted townhouse development
and request a deviation on the subject property.
WE VALUE YOUR INPUT
Business and property owners, residents and visitors
are welcome to attend the presentation, review pro.ject
materials and discuss the project with the owner and
Collier County staff. lf you are unable to attend this
meeting but have questions or comments, they can be
directed by mail, phone or e-mail to:
Margaret Emblidge, AICP
LJA Engineering, lnc.
7400 Trail Boulevard, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34108
Telephone: (239) 597-31 1 1
Email: memblidge@LJA,com
Zoom Meetin g Link: https ://l ja. zoom.us/j/ 848465 1 6060?
pwd=LmhVttoyQEGYlzlLaEiTnAYnJk5XtN. 1
Meting !D: 848 4651 6060
Passcode: 988153
August 23,2024 5:57 pm (GMT-4:00)Powered by TECNAVIA
for the latest...for the latest.,.
I 1
=s#,F/
3.B.l
Packet Pg. 148 Attachment: Attachment K - NIM Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
ONYX PDI NIM
Notice: This data belongs to the collier County Property Appraiser's Office (CGPA). Therefore, the recipient agrees not to represent this data to anyone as other thanCCPA provided data' The recipient may not transfer this data to others without consent from the ccpA.rtkr I't.tHftI3rft l artu # i tlkiiliftlEr t tilrt.Dffi mrffiB
..
BALLARD, DAVID H & BARBARA L -__ 60'9 POLLVAVE
BARCELO, DAGOBERTO ALEJANDRO BARCELO 6090 EVERETTST
BARCELO, DAGOBERTO ALEJANDRO BARCELO 6090 EVERETTST
BCLMCJ LLC 6 CASTLE DR
BLOOM, JAMES&SAMANTHA 6072 POLLYAVE
BLOOM, JAMES STEWART 6072 POLLYAVE
BLOOM, JAMESSTEWART SAMANTHA BLOOM 6072 POLLYAVE
BONNER, WILLIAM J & CHERYL C 1460 BLUE COURSE DR APT 14
CLAUSELL, ANTONIO & CECILIA 1 5913 SW 43RD STREET
coLLlER CNTY TRANSpoRTATIoN RtcHT-oF-wAy zBBs HoRSESHoE DRrvE s
COUPLAND, GENE ALAN HELYN CHRISTINE COUPLAND 3953 ROYAL WOOD BLVD
DIAZ, KENNYYUSET 6067 POLLYAVE
ELBA DEVELOPMENT CORP 600 5TH AVE S STE 207
ELBA DEVELOPMENT CORP 600 5TH AVE S STE 207
EVELY FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST 6080 EVERETT ST
FONTAINE, SUZANNE O 3865 ROYALWOOD BLVD
GALDAMEZ, DAVID ULISES AGNERYS CANIZAREZ 6098 EVERETT ST
GONZALEZ, MADERLINE 6066ADKINSAVE
GOREY, PAUL J PAUL J GoREY II 3733 RoYAL WooD BLVD
HINGSTON, SHIRLEY 3755 ROYAL WOOD BLVD
IM, RICHARD J & HELEN 3843 ROYAL WOOD BLVD
JONES, ROBERTO 6100 POLLYAVE
JONES, WILLIAM L & BARBARA F 3OOO COUNTY BARN RDKNOTCOLDLLC 12CRESCENTAVE
LAKE & WETLAND MANAGEMENT-WEST COAST INC 938 TROPIC BLVD
LANNING, SUSAN M ROBERT K GRISDALE 3982 ROYAL WOOD BLVDLAPORTE, DONALD J & PATRICIA A 2OO1 MARINA DR #410LUTZ,MARYM 3931 ROYALWOODBLVD
MATTHEW&TERYLS KOONMEN REVOCABLETRUST 3887 ROYALWOOD BLVD
MICHAEL S SCHOESSEL REV TRUST KERI LYNNE SCHOESSEL REV TRUST 4314 SUNSET BLVD
MURPHY, LANCE W & MAUREEN A 4O1O ROYAL WOOD BLVD
NAPLES PRESERVE VILLAS LLC 2385 NW EXECUTIVE CENTER DR STE#370
NAPLES PRESERVE VILLAS LLC 2385 NW EXECUTIVE CENTER DR STE#370
NAPLES PRESERVE VILLAS LLC 2385 NW EXECUTIVE CENTER DR STE #370
NAPLES PRESERVE VILLAS LLC 2385 NW EXECUTIVE CENTER DR STE #370
NAPLES PRESERVE VILLAS LLC 2385 NW EXECUTIVE CENTER DR STE #370
NAPLES PRESERVE VILLAS LLC 2385 NW EXECUTIVE CENTER DR STE #370
NAiIEI NAME6 NAME6
NAPLES, FL 34112..-2985
NAPLES, FL 34112---0
NAPLES, FL 34112---0
WILMINGTON, MA 0,I887.--0
NAPLES, FL 34112---0
NAPLES, FL 341 12...2946
NAPLES, FL 34112..-0
STATE COLLEGE, PA 1680,I.--O
MtAMt, FL 33185---0
NAPLES, FL 34104---O
NAPLES, FL 34112---8842
NAPLES, FL 34112_-O
NAPLES, FL 34102...6642
NAPLES, FL 34102-_6642
NAPLES, FL 34112--2938
NAPLES, FL 34112---2853
NAPLES, FL 34112-..0
NAPLES, FL 34112---2979
NAPLES, FL 34112---8840
NAPLES, FL 34112---8840
NAPLES, FL 34112--0
NAPLES, FL 34112.-.0
NAPLES, FL 34112---5438
WINDHAM, ME 04062--.0
DELRAY BEACH, FL 33483--0
NAPLES, FL 34112.--0
QU|NCY, MA 02171---0
NAPLES, FL 34112---8842
NAPLES, FL 34112---0
NAPLES, FL 34112___2959
NAPLES, FL 34112---8843
BOCA RATON, FL 33431---O
BOCA RATON, FL 33431---O
BOCA RATON, FL 33431---0
BOCA RATON, FL 33431_-O
BOCA RATON, FL 33431---0
BOCA RATON. FL 33431--O
Onyx PDI NIM - Property Owner List 500 Feet
1
3.B.l
Packet Pg. 149 Attachment: Attachment K - NIM Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
2
NAPLES PRESERVE VILLAS LLC
NAPLES PRESERVE VILLAS LLC
NAPLES PRESERVE VILLAS LLC
NAPLES PRESERVE VILLAS LLC
NAPLES PRESERVE VILLAS LLC
NAPLES PRESERVE VILTAS LLC
NAPLES PRESERVE VILLAS LLC
NAPLES PRESERVE VILLAS LLC
NAPLES PRESERVE VILLAS LLC
NAPLES PRESERVE VILLAS LLC
NAPLES PRESERVE VILLAS LLC
NAPLES PRESERVE VILLAS LLC
NAPLES PRESERVE VILLAS LLC
NAPLES PRESERVE VILLAS LLC
NAPLES PRESERVE VILLAS LLC
NAPLES PRESERVE VILLAS LLC
NAPLES PRESERVE VILLAS LLC
NAPLES PRESERVE VILLAS LLC
NAPLES PRESERVE VILLAS LLC
NAPLES PRESERVE VILLAS LLC
NAPLES PRESERVE VILLAS LLC
NAPLES PRESERVE VILLAS LLC
NAPLES PRESERVE VILLAS LLC
NAPLES PRESERVE VILLAS LLC
NAPLES PRESERVE VILLAS LLC
NAPLES PRESERVE VILLAS LLC
NAPLES PRESERVE VILLAS LLC
NAPLES PRESERVE VILLAS LLC
NAPLES PRESERVE VILLAS LLC
NAPLES PRESERVE VILLAS LLC
NAPLES PRESERVE VILLAS LLC
NAPLES PRESERVE VILLAS LLC
NAPLES PRESERVE VILLAS LLC
NAPLES PRESERVE VILLAS LLC
NAPLES PRESERVE VILLAS LLC
NAPLES PRESERVE VILLAS LLC
NAPLES PRESERVE VILLAS LLC
NAPLES PRESERVE VILLAS LLC
NAPLES PRESERVE VILLAS LLC
NAPLES PRESERVE VILLAS LLC
NAPLES PRESERVE VILLAS LLC
NAPLES PRESERVE VILTAS LLC
NELSON FAI\4ILY REVOCABLE TRUST
BOCA RATON, FL 33431-O
BOCA RATON, FL 33431-.0
BOCA RATON, FL 33431_-O
BOCA RATON, FL 33431_-0
BOCA RATON, FL 3343,1--0
BOCA RATON, FL 33431--0
BOCA RATON, FL 33431_-0
BOCA RATON, FL 33431_-0
BOCA RATON, FL 33431-0
BOCA RATON, FL 33431-_O
BOCA RATON, FL 33431-_O
AOCA RATON. FL 33431-.0
BOCA RATON. FL 33431.-0
BOCA RATON. FL 33431-.0
BOCA RATON. FL 3343,1--0
BOCA RATON, FL 33431--0
BOCA RATON, FL 33431_0
BOCA RATON, FL 3343'1_0
BOCA RATON, FL 33431-0
BOCA RATON, FL 33431-0
BOCA RATON, FL 33431-O
BOCA RATON, FL 33431..0
BOCA RATON, FL 33431--O
BOCA RATON, FL 33431--0
BOCA RATON, FL 33431---0
BOCA RATON, FL 33431---0
BOCA RATON, FL 33431---0
BOCA RATON, FL 3343'1--O
BOCA RATON, FL 33431-.0
BOCA RATON. FL 33431...0
BOCA RATON, FL 33431-.0
BOCA RATON, FL 33431-0
BOCA RATON, FL 33431-0
BOCA RATON, FL 33431-_O
BOCA RATON, FL 33431_O
BOCA RATON, FL 3343I---O
BOCA RATON, FL 33431-_0
BOCA RATON, FL 33431-_0
BOCA RATON, FL 33431---O
BOCA RAION, FL 33431-_0
BOCA RATON, FL 33431.-0
BOCA RATON, FL 33431_0
NAPLES, FL 34113-4019
STE #370
STE #370
STE #370
STE #370
STE #370
STE #370
STE #370
sTE #370
STE #370
STE #370
sTE #370
STE #370
sTE #370
STE #370
sTE #370
sTE #370
STE #370
STE #370
STE #370
STE #370
STE #370
STE #370
srE #370
srE #370
srE #370
STE #370
STE #370
STE #370
STE #370
STE #370
STE #370
STE #370
STE #370
STE #370
STE #370
sTE #370
sTE #370
STE #370
STE #370
sTE #370
sTE #370
sTE #370
Onyx PDI Nllvl - Property Owner List 500 Feet
2385 NW EXECUTIVE CENTER DR
2385 NW EXECUTIVE CENTER DR
2385 NW EXECUTIVE CENTER DR
2385 NW EXECUTIVE CENTER DR
2385 NW EXECUTIVE CENTER DR
2385 NW EXECUTIVE CENTER DR
2385 NW EXECUTIVE CENTER DR
2385 NW EXECUTIVE CENTER DR
2385 NW EXECUTIVE CENTER DR
2385 NW EXECUTIVE CENTER DR
2385 NW EXECUTIVE CENTER DR
2385 NW EXECUTIVE CENTER DR
2385 NW EXECUTIVE CENTER DR
2385 NW EXECUTIVE CENTER DR
2385 NW EXECUTIVE CENTER DR
2385 NW EXECUTIVE CENTER DR
2385 NW EXECUTIVE CENTER DR
2385 NW EXECUTIVE CENTER DR
2385 NW EXECUTIVE CENTER DR
2385 NW EXECUTIVE CENTER DR
2385 NW EXECUTIVE CENTER DR
2385 NW EXECUTIVE CENTER DR
2385 NW EXECUTIVE CENTER DR
2385 NW EXECUTIVE CENTER DR
2385 NW EXECUTIVE CENTER DR
2385 NW EXECUTIVE CENTER DR
2385 NW EXECUTIVE CENTER DR
2385 NW EXECUTIVE CENTER DR
2385 NW EXECUTIVE CENTER DR
2385 NW EXECUTIVE CENTER DR
2385 NW EXECUTIVE CENTER DR
2385 NW EXECUTIVE CENTER DR
2385 NW EXECUTIVE CENTER DR
2385 NW EXECUTIVE CENTER DR
2385 NW EXECUTIVE CENTER DR
2385 NW EXECUTIVE CENTER DR
2385 NW EXECUTIVE CENTER DR
2385 NW EXECUIIVE CENTER DR
2385 NW EXECUTIVE CENTER DR
2385 NW EXECUTIVE CENTER DR
2385 NW EXECUTIVE CENTER DR
2385 NW EXECUTIVE CENTER DR
23 PELICAN ST E
3.B.l
Packet Pg. 150 Attachment: Attachment K - NIM Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
3
PHELPS. BRADA
PHYLLIS T BOND TRUST
RHODES, ELIZABETH ANN
RIPPINGER, DENISE L
ROMAN, ALEXANDER QUINN
ROYAL WOOD MASTER ASSOC INC
ROYAL WOOD N,,IASTER ASSOC INC
SANTA BARBARA 2022 LLC
STEPHANIE L RUBINO REV TRUST
SIEPHEN HIIVISEL REV TRUSI
THOI\4AS J FITZPATRICK 2019
TRAN, TUAN DINH
VIGILIO, JOHN ERIK
ONYX TOWNHOI\4E VILLAS A C
3777 ROYAL WOOD BLVD
HAROLD H BOND JR TRUST
43OO SUNSET BLVD
3645 ROYAL WOOD BLVD
6050 EVERETT ST
43OO ROYAL WOOD BLVD
43OO ROYAL WOOD BLVD
14OO GULFSHORE BLVD N
4016 ROYAL WOOD BLVD
4538 NORTH STATEROAD 39
LIVING TRUST
HUYEN CHINH CAO
678 RIVERSIDE AVE
ON DO I\4IN IU I\4
3821 ROYAL WOOD BLVD
106
371,1 ROYAL WOOD BLVD
6051 POLLY AVE
DANVILLE, IN 46122--O
NAPLES, FL 34112_BA4O
NAPLES, FL 34112_O
NORWALK, CT 06850-_0
NAPLES,
NAPLES,
NAPLES,
NAPLES,
NAPLES,
NAPLES,
NAPLES,
NAPLES,
NAPLES,
112-A
112-0
112-2958
112*0
112--D
112--0
112--8A24
102-0
112-O
FL 34
FL 34
FL 34
FL 34
FL 34
FL 34
FL 34
FL 34
FL 34
Onyx PDI NIM - Propedy Owner List 500 Feet
3.B.l
Packet Pg. 151 Attachment: Attachment K - NIM Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
* LocaliQ
Florida
GANNETT
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBI-ICATION
Agnoli Barber Bmndage Inc
LJA Engineering Inc.?
7400]iail BLVD # 200
Naples FL 14108-2855
STATE OF WISCONSIN. COUNTY OF BROWN
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared, who
on oath says that he or she is the Legal Advertlsing
Representative of the Naples Daily News, a newspaper
published in Collier County, Florida; that the attached copy
of advertisement, being a Legal Ad in the matter of
Classified Legal CLEGI. was published on the publicly
accessible website of Collier and Lee Counties, Florida, or in
a newspaper by print in the issues oi on:
08127/2024
Affiant further says that the website or newspaper complies
with all legal requirements for publication in chapter 50,
Florida Statutes.
Subscribed and sworn to before me, by the legal clerk, who
is personally known to me, on 08/22/2024
PO Box 631244 Cincinnati, OH 45253-1244
otary of I,Brown
My commission expires
PublicationCost: $1413.20
Tax Amount $0.00
Payment Cost $1413.20
Order No: 10491989
Customer No: 1125687
PO #:
THIS IS NOT AN II.[/OICE!
Ple asr do not $e thitlonn{ot Wneniemittance
# of Copies
0
NANCY
Nota
HEYRMAN
ry Pubtic
State of Wlsco nsin Page 1 ol 2
5/5-fl
3.B.l
Packet Pg. 152 Attachment: Attachment K - NIM Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
NEIGHBO HOOD INFORMATIO N MEETING
PETITION: P[2O24O00,4116 - Onyx PDI
(lnsubstantial Change to PUD)
The public is invited to attend a neighborhood information
meeting in person or via Zoom held by Margaret Emblidge,
AICP, of LIA Engineering, lnc.
Tuesday, September 10,2024, at 5:30 PM
Collier County - South Regional Library*
8065 Lely Cultural Parkway
Naples, FL 34113
.The Collier County Public Library does not sponsor
or endorse this program.
Subject Property: Parcel No 00418680009
The property owner is petitioning Collier County to approve
the revision of PUD Exhibit B, Table l, to specify internal
development standards for a platted townhouse development
and request a deviation on the subject property.
WE VALUE YOUR INPUT
Business and property owners, residents and visitors
are welcome to attend the presentation, review project
materials and discuss the project with the owner and
Collier County staff. lf you are unable to attend this
meeting but have questions or comments, they can be
directed by mail, phone or e-mail to:
Margaret Emblidge, AlCp
LJA Engineering, lnc.
74OO Trail Boulevard, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34109
Telephone: (299) S9Z-91 1 I
Email: memblidge@LJA.com
Zoom Meeting Link: https://lja.zoom. uVj/848465 1 6060?
pwd=LmhWoyQEGYtzt LaEiTnAynJ k5XtN..1
Meting lD: 848 4651 6060
Passcode: 988153
I
Prol6ct
Location I
3i
tJH -rll
3.B.l
Packet Pg. 153 Attachment: Attachment K - NIM Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
239.597.3111
FBPR:31200
FDACS: LBB41 6
www.LJA.com
7400 Trail Blvd. Suite 200, Naples, Florida 34108
Date: Septemberll,2024
To: Tim Finn, Collier County
From: Margaret Emblidge, AICP, Planning Director
Re: NeighborhoodlnformationMeeting
PL20240004116 - Onyx PDI (Insubstantial Change to PUD)
Meeting Summary
The Neighborhood Information MeetingforPL20240004116 - Onyx PDI (Insubstantial Change to PUD)
was held on Tuesday, September 10,2024, at 5:30 PM at the Collier County - South Regional Library
located at 8065 Lely Cultural Parkway, Naples, Florida 34113.
Margaret Emblidge, AICP, Planning Director for LJA Engineering, introduced herself and the other project
team in attendance:
Jim Carr, P.E., LJA Engineering, Inc.
Kyle Castillo, SobelCo
Brent Bolde, Designer, LJA Engineering, Inc.
Elise Wilcox, LJA Engineering, Inc.
There were six (6) neighbors that attended in person, and no one called in through the Zoom link. The sign-
in sheets are attached.
Margaret presented the attached PowerPoint explaining the project:
The Applicant, Naples Preserve Villas, LLC, is a requesting to amend the Onyx RPUD Ordinance No
l6-24 pursuant to LDC Section 10.02.13.8.2.
The following are proposed for this PUD Insubstantial Change:
1. The modification to Exhibit B Table I - Residential Development Standards to add internal
development regulations for a fee simple ownership platted townhouse development; and
2. A deviation from LDC 4.07.02.G-1, Open Space Requirements, which requires Residential PUD
districts to provide a minimum of 60%o useable open space to allow 40% useable open space to
address the challenges created by the platting regulations and the definition ofuseable open space.
A history of the project was presented. It was explained that the current plan for the project is to construct
a platted subdivision insteadof the previously planned condominium style development. An exhibit was
reviewed that depicts the similarity of Uottr layouts. This included the buffers, wall and preserve to remain
3.B.l
Packet Pg. 154 Attachment: Attachment K - NIM Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
the same as the previous plan. Also noted was the request will not increase the number of units (48) nor
create external impacts.
The revised internal development standards for the platted fee simple ownership townhouse product were
reviewed.
The requested deviation regarding open space was explained that it would address the conflict between the
definition and the actual useable open space being provided. The sidewalks and open space elements within
the private platted rights-of-way are technically not included in the useable open space. However, these
elements are still provided and would result in the Townhouse Site Plan providing 4.67 acres of useable
open : 60%. Exhibits depicting these elements were presented along with the overall landscape and buffer
plan.
The next steps were reviewed regarding the scheduled HEX meeting which will be held September 26,
2024, at I pm at the Growth Management Department located at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Room
6091610.
Questions from the attendees:
1. Confirmed the single access from Adkins Avenue.
2. What would be done with the existing wall? - The wall will be repaired where needed.
3. Who will be responsible for the maintenance of the preserve area? - The owner has entered into an
agreement with the County and SFWMD regarding the maintenance into perpetuity.
4. Asked what the height of the buildings will be - Confirmed they are two-story units with a zoned
height of 35ft.
5. Asked about lighting - Confirmed that the development will meet the County requirements that
includes shielded lamps, and the lighting plan will be submitted by a photometric consultant.
6. Asked about the outfall of the drainage system - The stormwater system will have an outfall into
the Santa Barbara drainage swales and will not outfall anywhere else.
Margaret Emblidge, AICP
Planning Director
LJA Engineering, Inc.
memblidge@lja.com
(239) s97-3111
3.B.l
Packet Pg. 155 Attachment: Attachment K - NIM Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING
PETITION; PL2O24OOO4L16 - ONYX PDI (INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO PUD)
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 10, 2O24t AT 5:3O PM
COLLIER COUNTY . SOUTH REGIONAL LIBRARY
8065 LELY CULTURAL PARKWAY
NAPLES, FL 34113
MEETING SIGN.IN
NAME ADDRESS
<rL"< 1 ts--<'" Cc-\ocf(d *1 r.t r*r-t Bt-4
PHONE EMAIL
jl,rrs b[",^ (eo l' r oa'L
r\\? -7J F*o"SY (tA Pz1 s .1<Lc".<o*
Snn3bont 6(/4 3\il M ,Mk{V'ilI l^{xr-x)sv
3.B.l
Packet Pg. 156 Attachment: Attachment K - NIM Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
NAME
NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING
PETITION: PL2O24OOO4116 - ONYX PDI (INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO PUD)
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 10, 2024, AT 5:3O PM
COLLIER COUNTY - SOUTH REGIONAL LIBRARY
8065 LELY CULTURAL PARKWAY
NAPLES, FL 34113
MEETING SIGN.IN
ADDRESS PHONE EMAIL
6Tv I I..)r]Oce tlwvLnt B".lttey.-( I Pr ,., me-
3.B.l
Packet Pg. 157 Attachment: Attachment K - NIM Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
o
NAME
lJoevukt\) €',,
Tx6.-
NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING
PETITION: PL2O24OOO4116 - ONYX PDI (INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO PUD)
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER LO,2024, AT 5:3O PM
COLLIER COUNTY - SOUTH REGIONAL LIBRARY
8065 LELY CULTURAL PARKWAY
NAPLES, FL 34113
MEETING SIGN.IN
ADDRESS PHONE EMAIL
Aogo Eueeetr zsl^sVl- o /J-O?tt1A.l Zu
26ou l"L*L. )--Zsl - Zsz-9lr,r-T,urr" r ,[4*- 6c.l[,"-r-*{XPl. cu^
e-o kr.1
.1-
I
3.B.l
Packet Pg. 158 Attachment: Attachment K - NIM Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
\\\-\
\<-I
ONYX PUDI
INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE
PL202400041 16
,ab
$.r
rf
;{PLANNING &
LANDSCAPE
ARCH!TECTURE
I
I
J I UI
rrgir,\.\U
t-x
t*?t1$t'.
ttl
\
I
5
=
L'
L
\!
L
lL\
\
t,rt
r\t
,\N \
I /
d
YE
3.B.l
Packet Pg. 159 Attachment: Attachment K - NIM Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
PROJECT TEAM
Applicant and Owner: Naples Preserve Villas, LLC
Land Use Planner: Margaret Emblidge, AICP - LJA, Engineering, lnc.
Project Engineer: Jim Carr, P.E. - LJA, Engineering, Inc.
tJ \HHi&t*
3.B.l
Packet Pg. 160 Attachment: Attachment K - NIM Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
o.
=zo
-ktJoJ
s
\
l!
d,
.IHE
g5E
29ii24()
ist
E
H
E
F.t
I
't
E
I3.B.lPacket Pg. 161Attachment: Attachment K - NIM Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
IJA\PLANNING &
LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECTURE
The Applican! Naples Preserve Villa+ ttC, is a rcquesting to amend the Onyx RPUD
Ordinance No. 15-24 pursuant to LDC Section 10.02.13.E.2.
The foltowing are proposed for this PUD lnsubstantial Change:
1 the modification to Exhibit B Table 1 - Residential Development Standards to add
internal development regulations for a fee simple ownership platted townhouse
development; and
2. a deviation from tDC 4.07.02.G.1, Open Space Requirements, which requires
Residential PUD districts to provide a minimum of 6O% useable oPen space to allow
40% useable open space to address the challenges created by the platting
regulations and the definition of useable oPen space.
REQUEST
3.B.l
Packet Pg. 162 Attachment: Attachment K - NIM Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
The onyx RPUD was approved on september 1 l, zo1i.
A SFWMD Permit No. 11-100683-P was approved October 22,2018, and was
subsequently extended on December G, ZOZ}.
A site Development Plan (SDP) was approved on March 3, zozo. The sDp was based
on developing a condominium style community.
The original owner started construction of two condominium building+ the
clubhouse and perimeter wall. Due to a number of issues construction stopped.
The property was purchased by the applicant, Naples prcserve Villas, LLC. who has
demolished the existing improvements except the perimeter wall which will remain.
tJA\',ffHi&i,..HISTORY
3.B.l
Packet Pg. 163 Attachment: Attachment K - NIM Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
PLAT vs. CONDOMINIUM
The Plat creates 48 individual lots, one for each Townhouse, a tract for the Amenity
Centeti and tracts for private right-of-way, common areas and Preserve. The front,
rear and side yard setbacks for structures are measured to the internal Townhouse lot
lines.
Vs.
A Condominium development is one big parcel of land. The front, reor and side yard
setbacks for structures are meosured to the lot lines of the Condominium development
porcel. There are no internol property lines.
tJA\HHHfti,".
3.B.l
Packet Pg. 164 Attachment: Attachment K - NIM Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
IIlIIIIIlaIII
I
F
I
l
I
I
I
Lc
B
IIlIIl:E
E<
la*
I
I
I
_ L(rot frtu,og)zJo-
F
J
o.
'-rl--
,
------J
f
I
-;---
I
-..,\'9{!trr.-{}1r..
S
z
Ja.
UIF
ln
!
i7
i'ii
liiri
/:, )
I
1a-..'r
l l:
:1
{
Ei
a
lil
s
\
H
SHEz(Jl-
29.=z=o
ist
;::;8,,
iltI.t:j
.-B
z
Jo.
l-
Jo.
oullnoo.o&o.
d
zJa.Fzrll
=a.oJ
UI
UIo
EIF
-ln
olrl
o&o.o.
III
I
l3.B.lPacket Pg. 165Attachment: Attachment K - NIM Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
EXHIBIT B DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS:
Table I below sets forth the development standards for Single-Family and Multi-Family Residential land
uses within the proposed Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD). Standards not specifically set
forth within this application shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the
date of approval of the SDP or Subdivision plat.
TABLE I . RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
[4lltIliEAl,lltY-
E[AtEtUAr€F-&
TgWt.IHEUSE
(R)
TOWNHOUSE
a)
SINGLE-FAMILY
DWELLING/
ZERO LOT LINE
(R)
AMENITY
CENTER
(Ac)
ACCESSORY
STRUCTURES
MINIMUM LOT AREA AIIA 1.800 souare
feet
3,500 square feet N/A N/A
MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 6e-Feel 20 Feet 35 Feet N/A N/A
MINIMUM FLOOR AREA
OF BUILDINGS
+rqgg+,que+e-
+eet-{per-unit)1.400 souare
feet per Unit
1,400 square feet 750 square
feet
N/A
MINIMUM BUILOING
SETBACK
(From Pollv Avenue)
Tejee+70 feet 70 feet NA 35 feet
MINIMUM BUILDING
SETBACK
lFrom Sunset Avenuel
45e+eet 1 50 feet 150 feet 150 feet 1 50 feet
MINIMUM BUILDING
SETBACK(From Santa Barbara
Avenue)
3€Jeet 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet
MINIMUM BUILDING
SETBACK(From Adkins Ave ROW)
2O-{6€t 20 feet 2O feet 20 feet 20 feet
Page 1 of 3
Revised July 15,2024
. ,I I PLANNING &LrtAi ffi*i?€8f,".
3.B.l
Packet Pg. 166 Attachment: Attachment K - NIM Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
DEVELOPM ENT STAN DARDS CONT.
li{Utr+l+Aii{ltY.
DWEtt|NG &
TEWNHoUSE
{R}
TOWNHOUSE
a}
SINGLE-FAMILY
DWELLING/
ZERO LOT LINE
(R)
AMENIry
CENTER (AC)
ACCESSORY
STRUCTURES
MINIMUM DISTANCE
BETWEEN STRUCTURES
Structure 2s-feet
JSJeet
20 feet
10 feet 12feet
O or 10 feet
N/A
1O feet
SPS
MINIMUM INTERNAL
SETBACKS
Front Yard
Side Yard
Rear Yard
estur
SeJeet
eeJeet
20/6 feet
(2X5)
0/6 feet (4)
10 feet
20 feet
6 feet, or 0'on one
side and 12'on the
other
20 feet
3e 10 feet
1 0ll5 feet(6)
?el! feet
SPS
2OJe€t
J$fraet
2e+eet
SETBACKS FROM
LANDSCAPE BUFFER
EASEMENT (L.B.E.)I3i
{4.feet 10 feet
Perimeter
Buffer
0 feet
lntemal
Buffer
10 feet l+te€t
l9-feet
PgiCIelel
Buffer
O feet
lnternal
Buffer
d$feet
'10 feet
Perimeter
Mg
0 feet
lnternal
Buffer
25leet 10 feet
MAXIMUM ZONED
HEIGHT
3e,lerie€{.3,S
{eet 2 stories & 35
feet
2 stories & 35 feet '1 story & 25
feet 35 feet
MAXIMUM ACTUAL
HEIGHT
S+terie€"&a+
tuet 2 stories & 42
feet
2 stories & 42 feet
'l story & 25
feet 42feet
Foolnoles apply lglgl l+il'{rects-end-l0t}.in-S€+Ug:
'1, lf lhe psrel is dirsdy a€ttsoei bfa privat€ Crivevay; 8s$e6h is measureC ksm UE ba* ef 6u{b (i{
@
2. Front yad seback ftom he bacl of sidewalk to ltp face oftre gange door musl be a minimum ol 23
feel for intarnal private roads.
3 All L.B.E.! shall be phtted as sepaate lmcts or eassmenls on he Pla[@
4 0/6 side vard - Zem [0] fl. for shared walls and six 16) fr. fa exteior srde walls of tlre units from a lot line.
5. Lols hal have rttile Uun one lont vard rnav r€duce fie fr001 liard adiacenl lo the side 0f the strucbre tiat does
nol luve a dnveyray. to srx 16) fl. ftom a hl line,
6. Amenrttl Cenlsr - A 15ft. setbad is reouired onh atthe south orooertv linenractline.
Page 2 of 3
Revised July 15,2024
tJA\',ffHi&i,.=
3.B.l
Packet Pg. 167 Attachment: Attachment K - NIM Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
obar.st ,, ui rI$*SEEE:tEg$ig E us ES:; u ur
B-:= t S tEE'* s
[E il$$I$:E $
EE* i$EIIEEI E
:EE HEEF$EF$$
oaa
l-tnEI3dIIIu
zoIh
:
UIa
lu
IE
euEzoF
z=o
ist
s
\3.B.lPacket Pg. 168Attachment: Attachment K - NIM Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
IJA\PLANNING &
LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECTURE
. The last sentence of the definition of useable o pen space is what creates the
conflict.
. The platting of the project results in privately owned street rights-of-way
that coincides with the platted residential unit's lot lines vs. tlie rights ofway
that are not platted in a condominium development.. The sidewalks and some of the greenspace/landscape areas are located
within the plafted rights of way which based on the definition would not be
considered useable open space. Howeve[ these elements were included in
the open space calculations on the Condominium SDP.
. This request is to simply allow the same elements to be included in the
useable open space calculations on the Townhouse Site Plan and Plat.
DEVIATION J USTI FI CATION
3.B.l
Packet Pg. 169 Attachment: Attachment K - NIM Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
s!!ii{ Itli sdt lrNo E )oiI ,86
tq
I
ac
66t-& '*<b 6E6,oofio I q,
.E€ ;€!o oo
l3 63
EI IIzo
F
=tlto
tltI
o.ta
z
UILo
I
llt
tso
Ixlll
FIEII.Lxul
zo
Ih
I
lJla
lII
TJ
dln
zul
o.o
g6.
__t_
rr
--+-
rl
T-
I
I
I
I
L_
,l
I
l
I
I
tq
L-
I
.,,
I
I
li
l
I
li
-
_t
N
.'0
lr
rUiifl
rl
F:I
'lHr$
3
II
---t
r
I
I
ulc
EEEzoF
=o=2=O
I3t
s
\3.B.lPacket Pg. 170Attachment: Attachment K - NIM Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
tl@
i
t6
! :. =!. !. rri!!
rfJ?1jSN]h DNd YWIIW YTNYS
iiEB
E!ai
IIIlt
fiif,i
I9!H
Nfd llts ltY& o
s
,
:l
3
Irrie
EI
a
r t r -, llt I t:l tt
tl
,
I
I
!r
:ia r
;ilT
I
a
:
tI
e6*.r
rereE lJ 'NorvE v)orotE 3rns t^rxou31N3) 3^tln)fn 'AN 98tZ'f l.l'sylIrA l^dls3ud sildvN
rd
r l3 t
lliiII: i
II rlti3
=
II
";.ii*t:f'
,
I
II
aiill
.E!
r
I
!!
I
J
I
!
i
I
I
i
I
IIt
:l
:l
a
:
6
E
dt
it
?a
!
zJa.&ull&t&3E
fi
rII
a.
Ulnoz
J
JJ
&EI
o
H
s3E29=z=o
ist
I
:l
-l
rl
:l-l:t.l
I
,
-- .- -!-- -- *.-
., . i
l
I
s
\3.B.lPacket Pg. 171Attachment: Attachment K - NIM Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
coNcLUsloNs
The request complies with LDc section 10.02.13.E.2. - lnsubstantialchange:
. There is no increase in the number of approved residential units = 48
. There are no external impacts. The previous approved buffers will be provided'
. All changes are internal to the development.
. The deviation as requested would address the conflict between the definition and the actual
useable open space being provided. The sidewalks and open space elements within the
private platted rights-of-way are technically useable open space. lncluding these elements
would result in the Townhouse Site Plan providing 4.67 acres of useable open = 60%
l,lA\'ffH}ffi.",
3.B.l
Packet Pg. 172 Attachment: Attachment K - NIM Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
IJA\PLANNING &
LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECTURE NEXT STEPS
HEX Meeting: September 26,2024 - 1:00pm
Growth Management Department
2800 North Horseshoe Dr., Room 6091610
Contacts:
Ma rgaret Emblidge, AICP
mem lid aeI a m
239.597.3 11
Tim Finn, AICP
Timoth Finn colliercoun ova
239.252.4312
3.B.l
Packet Pg. 173 Attachment: Attachment K - NIM Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
E T
I
o(,
33
@'l
r/t 17t7
77
=
oi- g : -* .gE HaF HEE EB- if,sEEEr €Et Ee:r*EESESE EEi:iBEsESEEEE 'EE EE- E
daaaoa
€
,.a
'x,
U
l|l
e,
SHEzo'-29=z=o
ist
s
\
\.ilnl9z
T&UIozul&
J
&3FIJ
UIl-T
IIIJ&
i r
FI
II
t
IL
go
o
gD6'6
o
rf
\
\
,l
g
I.
r,''J
'1r3.B.lPacket Pg. 174Attachment: Attachment K - NIM Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
ul
u,
s5E
=ur=z=o
ist
s
\
o.
I
zo
-kIJoJ3.B.lPacket Pg. 175Attachment: Attachment K - NIM Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
ORIGINAL PUD MASTER CONCEPT PLANIJA\',ffHifri,..
LAND USE SUMMARY
ACREAGECATEGORY PERCENTAGE
OF TOTAL
ROW EASEMENT
(SANTABT.RMRA BLVD.)
INTERNAL ROW
RESIO€NTIAL AREA (R)
AUENITY CENIER (AC}
OPEN SPACE
WATER IiIANAGEMENT
PRESERVE (P)
PERIMETER BUFFERS
ADOITIONAL OPEN SPACE
0.93
'1.28
2.69
0.32
10.7%
14.5%
33.'l%
3.7
1.4'l
1.12
0.37
0.12
1e2%
12.8ft
1.21,
4.8%
TOTAL PROJECT 4.72 100%
9E
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CI(il
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
tr6EIF
ErU
I
:---'l
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
PROVED MCP PL2O1 4OOOO89O
t
x
q
t
ruYAEMlridl
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
!t
.FINAL ROW WIDTH SHALL BE IN
ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION
6,06.01.N OF THE LANO
OEVELOPMENT CODE.
PI.ANNING NOTES
CURRENT ZONING: RMF-6
PROPOSED ZONING: RPUO
CURRENT LAND USE: VACANT
PROPOSEO LANO USE: RESIOENTIAL
uslELE leEllSeAeE*-BEgUlEEllENl
7.79 AC x 60',6 = 4.67 AC
PIE9ERlG,EEO-UIBEUE-NT:
7.il6AC r 15% = 1.12 AC
\l
"t{l
8ldl
I
I
Q st"nt""Onyx RPUD Moster Plon Exhibit C #. I
)t\
r)
POLLY AVENUE, LtC
3.B.l
Packet Pg. 176 Attachment: Attachment K - NIM Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
F
t!
,l
'!
!
lrl
d,
snE2e6
i3ts
\
+IGI I
=(,z
IzoN3.B.lPacket Pg. 177Attachment: Attachment K - NIM Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
fI
I
I
luc
AHEzoF
:z9=.z=o
ist
s
\
,''l trtLitI\,\
\,
I
,'"\
^lt [/
r
Ir
7
7f
/\
Il-tzulvtUI&o.lII&
ofn
.,
,i
f
I
4(
t7
I
a
t
(q,l A-
ft
)
E
!
It
J
\
\
\I
F
o 03.B.lPacket Pg. 178Attachment: Attachment K - NIM Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
tJA\',ffHi&i,..
I
a{\a \
I PLANT SCHEDL,I.E BULDING 1ryPE 8 INII
sYm ffi ow rcTAutME qmME W !E
sYm ffi ow
q49! @eE Sr
soqs@
[-l* 7.1r2d s@tudtuFbrh.Ms.&!hd d
REFERENCE NOTES SCHEDT'-E BULDING 1ryPE 8 I.ATT
olffim
9l!@! pE$Rm
ffAMME
Wdtutu-Uh'
elEffi@@
MTAI&AL ME
htuMd ascd.
E cBr 60d
oircNw ff
UDO@h !!d,
Y*tu fF.
@mM scE
@l
E'
9A!
9A!
cE t&
Sffi
-(^?,il @. HT
@ @)ffANR %
$=@ilh Jfl,JU JT ;J h *'eJ1.., ,.,J1
tdrfktuqtE
rm
Mtu-ffiffidbe
aEu!
sq!fl
d
I
c4E9!
[J4-il
9r!
355 f
9g)tr
Gi :;{+a
TYHCAL zuILDING 1 ryFE8 UNIT
1"='lO P LA MT SC HED I..I.E B tI-O T'IG I TY P E 6 UIIT
OPEN SPACE DEVIATION EXHIBIT
i
I
UI@INGmt
uNrS
,.4\w-r
ffim
3.B.l
Packet Pg. 179 Attachment: Attachment K - NIM Materials (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
SIGN POSTTNG INSTRUCTIONS
(CHAPTER 8, COLLIER COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT)
A zoning sign(s) must be posted by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent on thc parccl for a minimum of fifteen (15) calendar
days in advance of the frst public hearing and said sign(s) must be maintained by ihe petitioner or the petitioner,s agent througbthe Board of County Commissioners Hearing. Belorv are general guidelines for signs, howelrr these guidelines- should n-otbe conskued to supersede any requirement of the LDC. For specific sign requireirents, please refer to the Administrative
Code, Chapter 8 E.
l. The sign(s) must be erected in full view of the public, not more than five (5) feet from the nearest street righl-of-$ay or
easement.
2. The sigrr(s) must be securely affixed by nails, staples, or other means to a wood frame or to a wood panel and then fastened
securely to a post, or other strucfure. The sign may not be affixed to a tree or other foliage.3. The petitioner or the petitioner's agent must maintain the sign(s) in place, and readable condition until the requested action
has been heard and a final decision rendered. Ifthe sign(s) is destroyed, los! or rendered unreadable, the peiitioner or the
petitioner's agent must replace the sign(s
NOTE: AFTER TIIE SIGN HAS BEEN POSTED, THIS AFFIDAI.IT
RETURI{ED NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORKING DAYS BEFORE
ASSIGNED PLANNER.
OF POSTNG NOTICE SHOULD BE
TIIE T'IRST HEARING DATE TO THE
AI.'TIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF COLLIER
BEFORE THE TNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, PERSONALLY APPEARED MATUATET EMbIidtE
WHO ON OATH SAYS TITAT HEiSHE HAS POSTED PROPER NOTTCE AS REQUIRED By SECTION 10.03.00 OF THE
THE PARCEL COVERED IN PETITION \\JMBERCOLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE ON
PL202UnO411
LJA Engineering,Inc.
Z+=09=Irqrl eorrtevard. Suite 2qA,
STREET OR P.O. BOXAGENT
Margaret Emblidge, AICP Nr FL 34108
ATENAME (TYPED OR PRNTED)
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF COLLIER
The
this
My Comnrission Expires:
(Stamp with seriat number)
-"{l'.;to% DENTSERRAIccH
Lwi H;$ixtflr
,/'
of t/_)frrysical presence or _ online notarization
is t/ personally known to me or who has produced
of
Rev.3/4/2015
3.B.m
Packet Pg. 180 Attachment: Attachment L - Hearing Advertisment Signs (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
7'
FE OntTRPUO
PllD hrutrLntld Chrngr
p0t&o{rl* lBelloff}.rr6
HIX S.$r*mh*r
'4.
litl ! fil*,n
Gcl'rlmrprrl.ll Orprtd
lfiO lorfr ilq'{tcr or, irr6 lE|ltofhri. fL ,110.
rva\
fhuDy I1*: i
3.B.m
Packet Pg. 181 Attachment: Attachment L - Hearing Advertisment Signs (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
Onyx RPUD
PUD lnsubstantial Change
Petition No. ?02400O41 16
HEX: Soplemtror 2'6, 2o2i. - l:00 p.m
Groryth l{rnegmont Orp.rtm.nt
2B0O t*o{th }lor*rhor I}r.. Room 6091810
Hrphr. FL t410.
PUBLIC HEA ING HOTICE
Timothy
a
'f
r'trf
t,
.C..'
I
I
j,f'U,CI
{
f
I
f
$t,b
..?
f
h
)r
v
rl
t-"i
' rrlr. t{vl'. .*; +-l"-tr
I
I
3.B.m
Packet Pg. 182 Attachment: Attachment L - Hearing Advertisment Signs (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
t
{.'*r\
t-')*a
,.r i
rl ..rf;I
;{ I t!,.t', t'
-Iv
t:,
&
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
Onyx RPUD
PUD lnsubstantlal Change
Petition No. ?024@04116
HEX: September 26, 202t1 - 1:00 P'm'
Growtft Urntgan€nt O.Parlmrnr
2E0O North Horg.-ho. D... Room 609'610
Neplc.. FL t410'
Timolhy Flnni 239-252{312
rl'
.lI
'-^
t.
3.B.m
Packet Pg. 183 Attachment: Attachment L - Hearing Advertisment Signs (29788 : PL20240004116 - Onyx RPUD (PDI))
09/26/2024
COLLIER COUNTY
Collier County Hearing Examiner
Item Number: 3.C
Doc ID: 29842
Item Summary: Petition No. SV-PL20240007875 – One Naples MPUD – Southbay Drive north of Vanderbilt
Beach Road and east of Gulf Shore Drive - Request for a variance from the Land Development Code Section
5.06.04.F.9, which requires “On Premises Directional Signs” located internal to the subdivision or development
shall maintain a minimum setback of 10 feet from the property line, to instead allow for directional signs for public
parking for commercial uses located in the One Naples MPUD MU Tract 1, along Southbay Drive north of
Vanderbilt Beach Road and east of Gulf Shore Drive, to be located a minimum of 5 feet from the property line in
Section 32, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Sean Sammon, Planner III]
(Commissioner District 2)
Meeting Date: 09/26/2024
Prepared by:
Title: Principal Planner – Zoning
Name: Sean Sammon
09/03/2024 4:16 PM
Submitted by:
Title: Zoning Director – Zoning
Name: Mike Bosi
09/03/2024 4:16 PM
Approved By:
Review:
Operations & Regulatory Management Michael Stark Review Item Completed 09/09/2024 10:19 AM
Growth Management Community Development Department Diane Lynch GMD Approver Skipped
09/13/2024 2:04 PM
Hearing Examiner (GMD Approvers) Diane Lynch Review Item Completed 09/16/2024 3:41 PM
Zoning Sean Sammon Review Item Skipped 09/03/2024 4:09 PM
Zoning Ray Bellows Review Item Completed 09/17/2024 10:26 AM
Unknown Jaime Cook GMCDD Reviewer Completed 09/18/2024 11:24 AM
Zoning Mike Bosi Division Director Completed 09/18/2024 2:23 PM
Hearing Examiner Andrew Dickman Meeting Pending 09/26/2024 1:00 PM
3.C
Packet Pg. 184
SV-PL202400007875, ONE NAPLES MPUD SIGN VARIANCE
September 3, 2024
Page 1 of 7
STAFF REPORT
TO: COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER
FROM: PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION GROWTH MANAGEMENT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
HEARING DATE: SEPTEMBER 26, 2024
SUBJECT: PETITION SV-PL20240007875, ONE NAPLES MPUD SIGN VARIANCE
______________________________________________________________________________
PROPERTY OWNER/AGENT:
Owner: Keith Gelder, Vice President Agent: Robert Mulhere, FAICP, Senior Vice President
Vanderbilt Naples Holdings, LLC Bowman Consulting Group
2639 Professional Circle, Ste 101 950 Encore Way
Naples, FL 34119 Naples, FL 34110
REQUESTED ACTION:
The applicant is requesting a variance from the Land Development Code Section 5.06.04.F.9, which
requires “On Premises Directional Signs” located internal to the subdivision or development shall
maintain a minimum setback of 10 feet from the property line to instead allow for directional signs for
public parking for commercial uses located in the One Naples MPUD MU Tract 1, along Southbay
Drive north of Vanderbilt Beach Road and east of Gulf Shore Drive, to be located a minimum of 5 feet
from the property line.
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION:
The approximate 5.42 acres subject property is located within the One Naples Mixed-Use Planned Unit
Development (MPUD), Ordinance 21-09, as amended, located at folios 79120840003 and 79120280003,
or 250 Center Street, Naples, FL 34108, also known as Vanderbilt Beach Center Block B in Section 32,
Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (Please see the location map on the
following page)
3.C.a
Packet Pg. 185 Attachment: Staff Report - SV-PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
SV-PL202400007875, ONE NAPLES MPUD SIGN VARIANCE
September 3, 2024
Page 2 of 7
3.C.aPacket Pg. 186Attachment: Staff Report - SV-PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples
SV-PL202400007875, ONE NAPLES MPUD SIGN VARIANCE
September 3, 2024
Page 3 of 7
PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
The subject property is located within the One Naples MPUD, located at the northeast corner of the
intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Shore Drive. The specific location for the requested
directional signs, for the two commercial uses of the Café Parking and the W. Raveis Parking, that this
sign variance petition is located in the One Naples MPUD, MU Tract 1, along Southbay Drive (as seen
in the image below).
Proposed directional signs for the commercial use parking areas; Source: Bowman Consulting Group, 2024.
The request is to allow for directional signs along Southbay Drive to be located 5 feet from the property
line while also being located 19 feet from the back-of-curb. The justification to allow the sign variance
request of the reduced setback to 5 feet from the property line is that this location is still 19 feet from the
back-of-curb because being greater than 10 feet from the back-of-curb meets the policy objective for the
setback request.
The necessity for the sign variance request is to improve wayfinding and reduce traffic conflicts for the
patrons who will visit these two commercial businesses. The MPUD Master plan identifies the locations
of ingress and egress to the project, with the primary access to the tower component located on
Vanderbilt Beach Road. Access to several of the midrise structures is located on Southbay Dr. The
commercial units face Gulf Shore Drive, however, parking and access to parking for these uses is
located on Southbay Dr.; therefore, directional signage for this project is imperative.
The location of the directional signs will require a reduction from the setback from the property line.
However, the back-of-curb will still be 19 feet as well as 25 feet from the actual travel lane. Allowing
the directional sign locations will help traffic flow when turning onto Southbay since it will direct the
traffic to the required parking for the commercial businesses. This will reduce any potential traffic
conflicts that confused driving may have caused when looking for parking for the commercial
businesses facing Gulf Shore Drive.
3.C.a
Packet Pg. 187 Attachment: Staff Report - SV-PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
SV-PL202400007875, ONE NAPLES MPUD SIGN VARIANCE
September 3, 2024
Page 4 of 7
AERIAL PHOTO
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING:
North: Vanderbilt Lagoon waterway with a zoning designation of Residential Single-Family-3
(RSF-3) zoning district.
South: Vanderbilt Beach Road (C.R. 862) Right-of-Way (R.O.W.) and then a mix of county parking
and the Ritz Carlton Hotel with a zoning designation of Pelican Bay Planned Unit
Development (PUD).
East: Southbay Drive R.O.W. and Center Street and then a Vanderbilt Palms Condominium,
Barefoot Pelican Condominium, a mixed commercial office building with a zoning designation
of Commercial Intermediate (C-3) zoning district.
West: Gulfshore Drive R.O.W., and then The Beechmoor Condominium and Phoenician Sands
Condominium, and then the Gulf of Mexico with a zoning designation of Residential Tourist
(RT) within the Vanderbilt Beach Residential Tourist Overlay Zoning District (VBRTO).
SUBJECT PROPERTY
3.C.a
Packet Pg. 188 Attachment: Staff Report - SV-PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
SV-PL202400007875, ONE NAPLES MPUD SIGN VARIANCE
September 3, 2024
Page 5 of 7
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY:
The subject property is located in the Urban Residential Subdistrict of the Future Land Use Map
(FLUM) of the GMP. The GMP does not address individual variance requests but focuses on the larger
issue of the actual use. The One Naples MPUD is consistent with the FLUM.
Based upon the above analysis, staff concludes that the proposed use for the subject site is consistent
with the Future Land Use Element (FLUE), although the variance request is not addressed by the GMP.
STAFF ANALYSIS OF SIGN VARIANCE CRITERIA UNDER LDC SECTION 5.06.08 B.1:
a. That special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure, or
building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same
district.
Yes, the subject property is a high traffic area, especially during season, because this location is less than
a few hundred feet to the beach and specifically has proximity to the County’s public beach access and
parking garage. Providing an efficient waypoint for parking access to the subject property’s commercial
businesses is essential for public health, safety, and welfare and for consistent traffic flow.
b. That literal interpretation of the provisions of the sign code would deprive the applicant of
rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district and would place
unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant.
Yes, the required setback for Directory Signs located adjacent to a R.O.W. in a “Residential District” is
10 feet measured from “a minimum of 10 feet from the edge of the roadway, paved surface or back of
the curb, as applicable”. The required setback is to be measured from different points under certain
circumstances such as the roadway, edge of pavement, or the back of curb. The basis for the 10-foot
setback for directional signs is for aesthetic purposes and safety reasons. However, the requirement for
setbacks for directional signs in residential and nonresidential districts is different, even though the
public policy objective is the same. Thus, the ability to locate directional signs in a safe and reasonable
location is necessary for wayfinding for guests and clients of commercial uses. Nevertheless, since the
request is to reduce the 10-foot setback to 5 feet from the property line, the setback from the back-of-
curb will still be a minimum of 19 feet.
c. That the special conditions and circumstances peculiar to the land, structure, or building do
not result from the actions of the applicant.
3.C.a
Packet Pg. 189 Attachment: Staff Report - SV-PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
SV-PL202400007875, ONE NAPLES MPUD SIGN VARIANCE
September 3, 2024
Page 6 of 7
The developer agreed under a condition of approval of the MPUD for significant enhancements to help
maintain the flow of traffic, including the precise location of the design and installation of improvements
to South Bay Drive, including the installation of a closed drainage system, 10-foot travel lanes, 4-foot
bike lanes, and 5-foot sidewalk on both sides of the road. The proposed directional signs are to be
located along South Bay Drive with these prior conditions approved for the MPUD before this
applicant’s request.
d. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that
is denied by this sign code to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same zoning district.
This sign variance will be applied to the location proposed for the type of signs within the MPUD
zoning district. Any other developer can apply for a sign variance if necessary for any other
development in the MPUD zoning district.
e. That the variance granted is the minimum relief that will make possible the reasonable use of
the land, building or structure.
Yes, this is the minimum relief relative to the sign variance request since the requested variance does not
increase the number or size of permitted signs and is consistent with the purpose and intent of the
County’s “Sign Code.” The request is to vary from the required 10-foot setback from the property line
for the proposed two directional signs directing the public to the parking areas for these commercial
uses, allowing instead for a minimum 19-foot setback from the back of curb and a setback for the travel
lane of slightly greater than 25 feet, fulfilling the achievement of the public policy objective for the
aforementioned setbacks.
f. That the granting of the variance will be consistent with the general intent and purpose of the
Collier County Sign Code and the Growth Management Plan and will not be injurious to adjacent
properties or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare.
The location of the proposed sign is not injurious to adjacent properties or otherwise is not detrimental
to the public welfare. The general intent and purpose of the proposed directional signs will improve
wayfinding and reduce the confusion on the part of visitors who are looking for these parking areas,
which will help improve the efficiency of traffic flow by reducing conflicts.
Moreover, the variance request will not increase the number or size of permitted signs and will remain
consistent with the County’s “Sign Code.” The purpose and intent of the “Sign Code” are:
(1) to provide minimum control of signs necessary to promote the health, safety, and general welfare of
the citizens of Collier County;
(2) to lessen hazards to pedestrians and vehicular traffic;
(3) to preserve property values;
(4) to prevent unsightly and detrimental signs that detract from the aesthetic appeal of the county and
lead to economic decline and blight;
(5) to prevent signs from reaching such excessive size and numbers that they obscure one another to the
detriment of the county;
3.C.a
Packet Pg. 190 Attachment: Staff Report - SV-PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
SV-PL202400007875, ONE NAPLES MPUD SIGN VARIANCE
September 3, 2024
Page 7 of 7
(6) to assure good and attractive design that will strengthen the county's appearance and economic base;
and
(7) to preserve the right of free speech and expression in the display of signs.
It is staff’s opinion that the request for the location of the two directional signs, to be 5 feet from the
property line but also 19 feet from the back of curb, as well as being 25 feet from the travel lane, meets
the intent of the LDC and thus is also consistent with the GMP.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Collier County Hearing Examiner render a decision to approve Petition SV-
PL20240007875 as requested by the Applicant, with the following condition:
1. The applicant is responsible for maintaining and replacing everything in the County’s Right-Of-
Way.
Attachments:
A) HEX Backup Package
B) Sign Variance Location & Details
C) Transportation Staff Email for Condition
D) Legal Ad & HEX Sign Posting
3.C.a
Packet Pg. 191 Attachment: Staff Report - SV-PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.bPacket Pg. 192Attachment: Attachment A - Backup Package (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.bPacket Pg. 193Attachment: Attachment A - Backup Package (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.bPacket Pg. 194Attachment: Attachment A - Backup Package (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.bPacket Pg. 195Attachment: Attachment A - Backup Package (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.bPacket Pg. 196Attachment: Attachment A - Backup Package (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.bPacket Pg. 197Attachment: Attachment A - Backup Package (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.bPacket Pg. 198Attachment: Attachment A - Backup Package (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.bPacket Pg. 199Attachment: Attachment A - Backup Package (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.bPacket Pg. 200Attachment: Attachment A - Backup Package (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.bPacket Pg. 201Attachment: Attachment A - Backup Package (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.bPacket Pg. 202Attachment: Attachment A - Backup Package (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.bPacket Pg. 203Attachment: Attachment A - Backup Package (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.bPacket Pg. 204Attachment: Attachment A - Backup Package (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.bPacket Pg. 205Attachment: Attachment A - Backup Package (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.bPacket Pg. 206Attachment: Attachment A - Backup Package (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.bPacket Pg. 207Attachment: Attachment A - Backup Package (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.bPacket Pg. 208Attachment: Attachment A - Backup Package (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.bPacket Pg. 209Attachment: Attachment A - Backup Package (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.bPacket Pg. 210Attachment: Attachment A - Backup Package (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.bPacket Pg. 211Attachment: Attachment A - Backup Package (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.bPacket Pg. 212Attachment: Attachment A - Backup Package (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.bPacket Pg. 213Attachment: Attachment A - Backup Package (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.bPacket Pg. 214Attachment: Attachment A - Backup Package (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.bPacket Pg. 215Attachment: Attachment A - Backup Package (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.bPacket Pg. 216Attachment: Attachment A - Backup Package (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.bPacket Pg. 217Attachment: Attachment A - Backup Package (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.bPacket Pg. 218Attachment: Attachment A - Backup Package (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.bPacket Pg. 219Attachment: Attachment A - Backup Package (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.b
Packet Pg. 220 Attachment: Attachment A - Backup Package (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.bPacket Pg. 221Attachment: Attachment A - Backup Package (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.bPacket Pg. 222Attachment: Attachment A - Backup Package (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.bPacket Pg. 223Attachment: Attachment A - Backup Package (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.bPacket Pg. 224Attachment: Attachment A - Backup Package (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.bPacket Pg. 225Attachment: Attachment A - Backup Package (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.bPacket Pg. 226Attachment: Attachment A - Backup Package (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.bPacket Pg. 227Attachment: Attachment A - Backup Package (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.bPacket Pg. 228Attachment: Attachment A - Backup Package (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.bPacket Pg. 229Attachment: Attachment A - Backup Package (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.bPacket Pg. 230Attachment: Attachment A - Backup Package (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.bPacket Pg. 231Attachment: Attachment A - Backup Package (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.bPacket Pg. 232Attachment: Attachment A - Backup Package (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.bPacket Pg. 233Attachment: Attachment A - Backup Package (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.bPacket Pg. 234Attachment: Attachment A - Backup Package (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.bPacket Pg. 235Attachment: Attachment A - Backup Package (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.bPacket Pg. 236Attachment: Attachment A - Backup Package (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.bPacket Pg. 237Attachment: Attachment A - Backup Package (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.bPacket Pg. 238Attachment: Attachment A - Backup Package (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.bPacket Pg. 239Attachment: Attachment A - Backup Package (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.bPacket Pg. 240Attachment: Attachment A - Backup Package (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.bPacket Pg. 241Attachment: Attachment A - Backup Package (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.bPacket Pg. 242Attachment: Attachment A - Backup Package (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.bPacket Pg. 243Attachment: Attachment A - Backup Package (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.bPacket Pg. 244Attachment: Attachment A - Backup Package (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.bPacket Pg. 245Attachment: Attachment A - Backup Package (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.bPacket Pg. 246Attachment: Attachment A - Backup Package (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.bPacket Pg. 247Attachment: Attachment A - Backup Package (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.bPacket Pg. 248Attachment: Attachment A - Backup Package (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.bPacket Pg. 249Attachment: Attachment A - Backup Package (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.bPacket Pg. 250Attachment: Attachment A - Backup Package (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.bPacket Pg. 251Attachment: Attachment A - Backup Package (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.bPacket Pg. 252Attachment: Attachment A - Backup Package (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.bPacket Pg. 253Attachment: Attachment A - Backup Package (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.bPacket Pg. 254Attachment: Attachment A - Backup Package (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.bPacket Pg. 255Attachment: Attachment A - Backup Package (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.bPacket Pg. 256Attachment: Attachment A - Backup Package (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.bPacket Pg. 257Attachment: Attachment A - Backup Package (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.bPacket Pg. 258Attachment: Attachment A - Backup Package (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
PL20240007875 – ONE NAPLES MPUD: SIGN VARIANCE DETAILS
One Naples MPUD Sign Variance – Aerial & Location; Source: Bowman, 2024
One Naples MPUD Sign Variance – Proposed Directional Signs Location; Source: Bowman, 2024
3.C.c
Packet Pg. 259 Attachment: Attachment B - Sign Variance Location & Details (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
One Naples MPUD Sign Variance – Signs Details & Dimension; Source: Bowman, 2024
3.C.c
Packet Pg. 260 Attachment: Attachment B - Sign Variance Location & Details (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
1
Sean Sammon
From:Michael Sawyer
Sent:Friday, August 23, 2024 11:48 AM
To:Sean Sammon
Cc:Derek Perry; Kathynell Crotteau
Subject:RE: (SV) PL20240007875 - ONE NAPLES MPUD - Draft Title
Sean,
Thanks so much for keeping this one active...on my must-dos!
We’ve reviewed it and discussed it with Derek this morning. We do not have issues with the proposed
change. There are no plans to change or expand this roadway; the applicant is responsible for maintaining and
replacing everything in our/the ROW. The proposed signs will be located closer to our ROW but will be within the
development(s) parcel(s).
Transportation Planning has no objection to this request.
Please let me know if you have any additional questions or concerns.
Respectfully,
Michael Sawyer
Project Manager II
Transportation Management Services Department
Transportation Planning
2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Suite 103
Naples, Florida 34104
239-252-2926
michael.sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov
Michael Sawyer
Project Manager II
Capital Project Planning, Impact Fees and Program Management
Office:239-252-2926
Michael.Sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov
From: Sean Sammon <Sean.Sammon@colliercountyfl.gov>
Sent: Friday, August 23, 2024 10:27 AM
To: Michael Sawyer <Michael.Sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov>
Cc: Derek Perry <Derek.Perry@colliercountyfl.gov>; Kathynell Crotteau <Kathynell.Crotteau@colliercountyfl.gov>
Subject: FW: (SV) PL20240007875 - ONE NAPLES MPUD - Draft Title
3.C.d
Packet Pg. 261 Attachment: Attachment C - Transportation Staff Email for Condition (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
2
Good morning Mike,
I’m sorry to keep pestering you about this petition, but we had a title made for this and it needs to be published by
Tuesday, Aug 27th. Any chance you can confirm if there are any road maintenance issues related to their request?
Thank you Mike, have a great day.
Sean Sammon
Planner III
Zoning
Office:239-252-8422
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
Sean.Sammon@colliercountyfl.gov
From: Sean Sammon <Sean.Sammon@colliercountyfl.gov>
Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2024 2:48 PM
To: Michael Sawyer <Michael.Sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov>
Cc: Ray Bellows <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov>
Subject: RE: (SV) PL20240007875 - ONE NAPLES MPUD - Draft Title
Mike,
When you finish reviewing, can you please CC Derek just so he’s aware if there’s anymore issues uncovered?
Thank you.
Sean Sammon
Planner III
Zoning
Office:239-252-8422
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
Sean.Sammon@colliercountyfl.gov
From: Sean Sammon <Sean.Sammon@colliercountyfl.gov>
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2024 11:07 AM
To: Michael Sawyer <Michael.Sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov>
Cc: Ray Bellows <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov>
Subject: FW: (SV) PL20240007875 - ONE NAPLES MPUD - Draft Title
Mike,
3.C.d
Packet Pg. 262 Attachment: Attachment C - Transportation Staff Email for Condition (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3
FYI, from the latest monitoring report:
3.C.d
Packet Pg. 263 Attachment: Attachment C - Transportation Staff Email for Condition (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
4
Sean Sammon
Planner III
Zoning
Office:239-252-8422
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
Sean.Sammon@colliercountyfl.gov
From: Ray Bellows <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov>
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2024 9:22 AM
To: Sean Sammon <Sean.Sammon@colliercountyfl.gov>
Subject: RE: (SV) PL20240007875 - ONE NAPLES MPUD - Draft Title
Yes.
Ray Bellows
Manager - Planning
Zoning
Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov
From: Sean Sammon <Sean.Sammon@colliercountyfl.gov>
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2024 8:31 AM
To: Ray Bellows <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov>
Subject: FW: (SV) PL20240007875 - ONE NAPLES MPUD - Draft Title
Ray, are you free at 10am for a call with them?
Sean Sammon
Planner III
Zoning
Office:239-252-8422
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
Sean.Sammon@colliercountyfl.gov
3.C.d
Packet Pg. 264 Attachment: Attachment C - Transportation Staff Email for Condition (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
5
From: Michael Sawyer <Michael.Sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov>
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2024 4:56 PM
To: Derek Perry <Derek.Perry@colliercountyfl.gov>; Sean Sammon <Sean.Sammon@colliercountyfl.gov>
Cc: Kathynell Crotteau <Kathynell.Crotteau@colliercountyfl.gov>; Heidi Ashton <Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov>
Subject: RE: (SV) PL20240007875 - ONE NAPLES MPUD - Draft Title
We/I need to review the landscape maintenance agreement. Is the applicant responsible for ALL
maintenance/replacement...including signage?
I’m available until 11:00 and can check the agreement ahead of time...
Mike
Michael Sawyer
Project Manager II
Capital Project Planning, Impact Fees and Program Management
Office:239-252-2926
Michael.Sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov
From: Derek Perry <Derek.Perry@colliercountyfl.gov>
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2024 4:40 PM
To: Sean Sammon <Sean.Sammon@colliercountyfl.gov>
Cc: Kathynell Crotteau <Kathynell.Crotteau@colliercountyfl.gov>; Michael Sawyer
<Michael.Sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov>; Heidi Ashton <Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov>
Subject: RE: (SV) PL20240007875 - ONE NAPLES MPUD - Draft Title
Sean,
I looked at the scheduler to see when we could all meet on this tomorrow; you have conflicts throughout the
morning (otherwise us three appear to be open between 10-11am). If so, 4:00pm is open on all of our
schedules. Otherwise, we are all generally available on Friday to meet.
Derek D. Perry
Assistant County Attorney
(239) 252-8066
From: Heidi Ashton <Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov>
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2024 4:37 PM
To: Sean Sammon <Sean.Sammon@colliercountyfl.gov>; Derek Perry <Derek.Perry@colliercountyfl.gov>
Cc: Kathynell Crotteau <Kathynell.Crotteau@colliercountyfl.gov>; Michael Sawyer
<Michael.Sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov>
Subject: RE: (SV) PL20240007875 - ONE NAPLES MPUD - Draft Title
Sean,
Can you please send the application and sign Exhibits to Mike Sawyer and ask him if a 5 foot sign setback on SouthBay
Drive is acceptable to staff? I’ve copied him for his awareness. Thanks.
3.C.d
Packet Pg. 265 Attachment: Attachment C - Transportation Staff Email for Condition (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
6
Heidi Ashton-Cicko
Managing Assistant County Attorney
Office of the County Attorney
2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Suite 301
Naples, FL 34104
(239) 252-8773
From: Sean Sammon <Sean.Sammon@colliercountyfl.gov>
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2024 4:24 PM
To: Heidi Ashton <Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov>; Derek Perry <Derek.Perry@colliercountyfl.gov>
Cc: Kathynell Crotteau <Kathynell.Crotteau@colliercountyfl.gov>
Subject: RE: (SV) PL20240007875 - ONE NAPLES MPUD - Draft Title
Mike S hasn’t, I just forward to him to gather his input.
Sean Sammon
Planner III
Zoning
Office:239-252-8422
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
Sean.Sammon@colliercountyfl.gov
From: Heidi Ashton <Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov>
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2024 4:19 PM
To: Derek Perry <Derek.Perry@colliercountyfl.gov>; Sean Sammon <Sean.Sammon@colliercountyfl.gov>
Cc: Kathynell Crotteau <Kathynell.Crotteau@colliercountyfl.gov>
Subject: RE: (SV) PL20240007875 - ONE NAPLES MPUD - Draft Title
I don’t recall if SouthBay Drive is still a public road. I am not in favor of 5 foot setbacks on county roads for signage. If it
is the County’s signage that is different. Has Mike Sawyer okayed this? Thanks.
Heidi Ashton-Cicko
Managing Assistant County Attorney
Office of the County Attorney
2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Suite 301
Naples, FL 34104
(239) 252-8773
From: Derek Perry <Derek.Perry@colliercountyfl.gov>
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2024 3:26 PM
To: Heidi Ashton <Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov>; Sean Sammon <Sean.Sammon@colliercountyfl.gov>
Cc: Kathynell Crotteau <Kathynell.Crotteau@colliercountyfl.gov>
Subject: RE: (SV) PL20240007875 - ONE NAPLES MPUD - Draft Title
Heidi,
3.C.d
Packet Pg. 266 Attachment: Attachment C - Transportation Staff Email for Condition (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
7
I thought of it as more a condition/caveat that the developer is offering; that it is a variance from code (10 feet
down to 5 feet); but is set back 19 feet visually.
Derek D. Perry
Assistant County Attorney
(239) 252-8066
From: Heidi Ashton <Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov>
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2024 1:34 PM
To: Sean Sammon <Sean.Sammon@colliercountyfl.gov>; Derek Perry <Derek.Perry@colliercountyfl.gov>
Cc: Kathynell Crotteau <Kathynell.Crotteau@colliercountyfl.gov>
Subject: RE: (SV) PL20240007875 - ONE NAPLES MPUD - Draft Title
Sean,
I don’t believe we have a backup of curb requirement in the LDC. The second must be a deviation from the PUD. I am in
a meeting but we need to chat about this. thanks.
Heidi Ashton-Cicko
Managing Assistant County Attorney
Office of the County Attorney
2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Suite 301
Naples, FL 34104
(239) 252-8773
From: Sean Sammon <Sean.Sammon@colliercountyfl.gov>
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2024 9:03 AM
To: Derek Perry <Derek.Perry@colliercountyfl.gov>
Cc: Kathynell Crotteau <Kathynell.Crotteau@colliercountyfl.gov>; Heidi Ashton <Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov>
Subject: FW: (SV) PL20240007875 - ONE NAPLES MPUD - Draft Title
Derek,
Attached is the draft title for the One Naples Sign Variance. Bob’s suggested Title is highlighted in the email below.
Please provide guidance on how this title should be drafted as soon as you can, I’m trying to schedule their HEX for
September, this needs to be done by the end of tomorrow, August 21st.
Sean Sammon
Planner III
Zoning
Office:239-252-8422
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
Sean.Sammon@colliercountyfl.gov
From: Robert Mulhere <rmulhere@bowman.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2024 8:33 AM
To: Sean Sammon <Sean.Sammon@colliercountyfl.gov>
3.C.d
Packet Pg. 267 Attachment: Attachment C - Transportation Staff Email for Condition (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
8
Cc: Stephanie Karol <skarol@bowman.com>
Subject: RE: (SV) PL20240007875 - ONE NAPLES MPUD - Draft Title
EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme
caution when opening attachments or clicking links.
My only question is whether we need to specify the address. I think they may change when the buildings are CO’d.
Can you see if Heidi is ok with the title below?
HEX TITLE - SIGN VARIANCE (SV)
PETITION NO. SV-PL20240007875 – Request for a variance from the Land Development Code Section 5.06.04.F.9
which requires “On Premises Directional Signs” located internal to the subdivision or development shall maintain
a minimum setback of 10 feet from the property line, to instead allow for directional signs for public parking for
commercial uses located in the One Naples MPUD MU Tract 1, along Southbay Drive, to be located a minimum of
5 feet from the property line and 19 feet from the back of curb.
BOB MULHERE, FAICP
Senior Vice President | BOWMAN
O: (239) 254-2000 | D: (239) 254-2026 | M: (239) 825-9373
rmulhere@bowman.com
From: Sean Sammon <Sean.Sammon@colliercountyfl.gov>
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2024 8:25 AM
To: Robert Mulhere <rmulhere@bowman.com>
Cc: Stephanie Karol <skarol@bowman.com>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] (SV) PL20240007875 - ONE NAPLES MPUD - Draft Title
Good morning Bob, Attached is the draft Title for PL20240007875, Sign Variance request for the One Naples MPUD. Please review, offer any necessary corrections, otherwise, please let me know if you approve it. I will then forward to CAO for their review, once CAO approves, we can
Good morning Bob,
Attached is the draft Title for PL20240007875, Sign Variance request for the One Naples MPUD. Please review, offer any
necessary corrections, otherwise, please let me know if you approve it. I will then forward to CAO for their review, once
CAO approves, we can schedule the HEX hearing. Please let me know if you have any questions, have a great day.
3.C.d
Packet Pg. 268 Attachment: Attachment C - Transportation Staff Email for Condition (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
9
Sean Sammon
Planner III
Zoning
Office:239-252-8422
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
Sean.Sammon@colliercountyfl.gov
Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a
public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing.
3.C.d
Packet Pg. 269 Attachment: Attachment C - Transportation Staff Email for Condition (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
Vanderbilt DRPalmCT
91 s tAVEN
92 ndAVEN
9 3rdAVENGulf Shore DRVanderbilt Beach RD
Southbay DR
RitzCarl
tonDR!I
Projec tLocation 3.C.e
Packet Pg. 270 Attach
Naples Daily News - 09/06/2024 Page : A13
September 6, 2024 3:07 pm (GMT -4:00) Powered by TECNAVIA
+NAPLESNEWS.COM | FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 6, 2024 |13A
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Hearing Examiner
(HEX) at 1:00 P.M., September 26, 2024, in the Hearing Examiner’s Meeting Room, at 2800 North
Horseshoe Drive, Room 609/610, Naples |FL 34104, to consider:
PETITION NO. PDI-PL20240007161- REQUEST FOR AN INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE
TO ORDINANCE NO. 2019-34, THE VANDERBILT COMMONS PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT (PUD), TO AMEND SECTION 5.17.C SO THAT THE SECTION NO LONGER
APPLIES TO LOTS 5 AND 6. THE VANDERBILT COMMONS PUD WAS ORIGINALLY
ESTABLISHED AS THE CAROLINA VILLAGE PUD UNDER ORDINANCE NO. 2005-19, AS
AMENDED. THE PUD NAME WAS CHANGED TO THE VANDERBILT COMMONS PUD BY
ORDINANCE NO. 2017-47, AS AMENDED. THE ±2.51-ACRE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS
WITHIN THE ±14.49-ACRE PUD AND LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUADRANT
OF THE INTERSECTION OF VANDERBILT 8": AND BUCKSTONE DRIVE IN
SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA.
All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. All materials used in presentation before the Hearing
Examiner will become a permanent part of the record.
Copies of staff report are available one (1) week prior to the hearing. The file can be reviewed at the Collier
County Growth Management Community Development Department, Zoning Division, 2800 North Horseshoe
Drive, Naples, FL 34104.
As to any petition upon which the Hearing Examiner takes action, an aggrieved petitioner may appeal such
final action. Such appeal shall be filed per Section 2-88 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances
within 30 days of the decision by the Hearing Examiner. An aggrieved non-party may appeal a decision by the
Hearing Examiner to the Circuit Court of Collier County within 30 days of the decision. In the event that the
petition has been approved by the Hearing Examiner, the applicant shall be advised that he/she proceeds with
construction at his/her own risk during this 30-day period. Any construction work completed ahead of the
approval authorization shall be at their own risk.
As part of an ongoing initiative to encourage public involvement, the public will have the opportunity to
provide public comments remotely, as well as in person, during this proceeding. Individuals who would
like to participate remotely should register through the link provided within the specific event/meeting
entry on the Calendar of Events on the County website at www.colliercountyfl.gov/our-county/visitors/
calendar-of-events after the agenda is posted on the County website. Registration should be done in
advance of the public meeting, or any deadline specified within the public meeting notice. Individuals who
register will receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how they can participate remotely
in this meeting. Remote participation is provided as a courtesy and is at the user’s risk. The County is not
responsible for technical issues. For additional information about the meeting, please call Ray Bellows at
252-2463 or email to Ray. Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov.
If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding,
you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County
Zoning Division located at 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr, Naples, Florida 34104, (239) 252- 2400, at least two (2)
days prior to the meeting.
Andrew W. J. Dickman, Esq., AICP Chief Hearing Examiner
Collier County, Florida ND-40166771
Ambros ia
LNIslandwalk CIRMission Hills DR
Acorn WAY
Collier BLVDAnguilla
WAY
Acorn
WAY
BuckstoneDRVander bil t Beach RD SonomaOaksDRVanderbil t
WAY
7 th AVE NW
!I
Project
Location
ND-40166784
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Hearing Examiner (HEX) at
1:00 P.M., September 26, 2024, in the Hearing Examiner’s Meeting Room, at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive,
Room 609/610, Naples FL 34104, to consider:
PETITION NO. SV-PL20240007875 – REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE
SECTION 5.06.04.F.9 WHICH REQUIRES “ON PREMISES DIRECTIONAL SIGNS” LOCATED INTERNAL
TO THE SUBDIVISION OR DEVELOPMENT SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM SETBACK OF 10 FEET FROM
THE PROPERTY LINE, TO INSTEAD ALLOW FOR DIRECTIONAL SIGNS FOR PUBLIC PARKING FOR
COMMERCIAL USES LOCATED IN THE ONE NAPLES MPUD MU TRACT 1, ALONG SOUTHBAY DRIVE
NORTH OF VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD AND EAST OF GULF SHORE DRIVE, TO BE LOCATED A MINIMUM
OF 5 FEET FROM THE PROPERTY LINE IN SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA. Vanderbilt DRPalm
CT
9 1 s t
AVE N
92 nd
AVE N
9 3rd
AVE NGulf Shore DRVanderbilt
B
e
a
c
h
R
D
Southbay
DR
RitzCarltonDR!I
Project
Location
All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. All materials used in presentation before the
Hearing Examiner will become a permanent part of the record.
Copies of staff report are available one (1) week prior to the hearing. The file can be reviewed at the Collier
County Growth Management Community Development Department, Zoning Division, 2800 North Horseshoe
Drive, Naples, FL 34104.
As to any petition upon which the Hearing Examiner takes action, an aggrieved petitioner may appeal such
final action. Such appeal shall be filed per Section 2-88 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances
within 30 days of the decision by the Hearing Examiner. An aggrieved non-party may appeal a decision by
the Hearing Examiner to the Circuit Court of Collier County within 30 days of the decision. In the event that
the petition has been approved by the Hearing Examiner, the applicant shall be advised that he/she proceeds
with construction at his/her own risk during this 30-day period. Any construction work completed ahead of
the approval authorization shall be at their own risk.
As part of an ongoing initiative to encourage public involvement, the public will have the opportunity to
provide public comments remotely, as well as in person, during this proceeding. Individuals who would like
to participate remotely should register through the link provided within the specific event/meeting entry on
the Calendar of Events on the County website at www.colliercountyfl.gov/our-county/visitors/calendar-of-
events after the agenda is posted on the County website. Registration should be done in advance of the
public meeting, or any deadline specified within the public meeting notice. Individuals who register will
receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how they can participate remotely in this meeting.
Remote participation is provided as a courtesy and is at the user’s risk. The County is not responsible for
technical issues. For additional information about the meeting, please call Ray Bellows at 252-2463 or email
to Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov.
If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding,
you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County
Zoning Division located at 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr, Naples, Florida 34104, (239) 252- 2400, at least two (2)
days prior to the meeting.
Andrew W. J. Dickman, Esq., AICP
Chief Hearing Examiner
Collier County, Florida
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGNotice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Hearing Examiner (HEX) at 1:00 P.M., September 26, 2024, in the Hearing Examiner’s Meeting Room, at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Room 609/610, Naples FL 34104, to consider:PETITION NO. PDI PL20240004116 – NAPLES PRESERVE VILLAS, LLC REQUESTS AN INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO THE ONYX RPUD, ORDINANCE 16-24 FOR (1), THE MODIFICATION TO EXHIBIT B TABLE 1 – RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TO ADD INTERNAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR A PLATTED TOWNHOUSE DEVELOPMENT; AND (2) A DEVIATION FROM LDC 4.07.02.G.1, OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS, WHICH REQUIRES RESIDENTIAL PUD DISTRICTS TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 60% USEABLE OPEN SPACE TO ALLOW 40% USEABLE OPEN SPACE. THE SUBJECT 8.72 +/- ACRE PARCEL IS LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF SANTA BARBARA BOULEVARD APPROXIMATELY ONE-HALF MILE NORTH OF RATTLESNAKE-HAMMOCK ROAD IN SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. All materials used in presentation before the Hearing Examiner will become a permanent part of the record.Copies of staff report are available one (1) week prior to the hearing. The file can be reviewed at the Collier County Growth Management Community Development Department, Zoning Division, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL 34104.As to any petition upon which the Hearing Examiner takes action, an aggrieved petitioner may appeal such final action. Such appeal shall be filed per Section 2-88 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances within 30 days of the decision by the Hearing Examiner. An aggrieved non-party may appeal a decision by the Hearing Examiner to the Circuit Court of Collier County within 30 days of the decision. In the event that the petition has been approved by the Hearing Examiner, the applicant shall be advised that he/she proceeds with construction at his/her own risk during this 30-day period. Any construction work completed ahead of the approval authorization shall be at their own risk.As part of an ongoing initiative to encourage public involvement, the public will have the opportunity to provide public comments remotely, as well as in person, during this proceeding. Individuals who would like to participate remotely should register through the link provided within the specific event/meeting entry on the Calendar of Events on the County website at www.colliercountyfl.gov/our-county/visitors/calendar-of-events after the agenda is posted on the County website. Registration should be done in advance of the public meeting, or any deadline specified within the public meeting notice. Individuals who register will receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how they can participate remotely in this meeting. Remote participation is provided as a courtesy and is at the user’s risk. The County is not responsible for technical issues. For additional information about the meeting, please call Ray Bellows at 252-2463 or email to Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov.If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Zoning Division located at 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr, Naples, Florida 34104, (239) 252- 2400, at least two (2) days prior to the meeting.Andrew W. J. Dickman, Esq., AICP
Chief Hearing Examiner
Collier County, Florida Santa Barbara BLVDAdkins AVE Sunset BLVDCo bbl e s t on e LN RoyalWoodBLVDPolly AVEAmherstDROnyxCIRAdkins AVEEverett ST !IProjectLocationPARIS – French President Emman-uel Macron appointed Michel Barnier,the EU’s former Brexit negotiator, as hisnew prime minister on Thursday, task-ing him with unifying France and end-ing the political paralysis that followedan inconclusive snap election.The discreet, conservative politicianwill have the daunting challenge of try-ing to push reforms, and the 2025 bud-get, through a bitterly divided Parlia-ment, under the constant threat of avote of no confidence.At 73, Barnier is the oldest primeminister in France’s modern politicalhistory, taking over from Gabriel Attal,who was the youngest. It took Macrontwo months to appoint him, after theelection failed to yield a clear majority.The left – which placed first in theelection but without an absolute major-ity – made clear it would be a staunchopponent.“The election was stolen from theFrench people,” hard-left leader Jean-Luc Melenchon said, calling for streetprotests on Saturday. Another hard-leftlawmaker, Mathilde Panot, called it an“unacceptable democratic coup.”Much will depend on the far-rightNational Rally, Parliament’s biggestsingle party, which indicated it wouldnot block Barnier for now, but could doso later if demands were not met.“We will plead for the major emer-gencies of the French – the cost of liv-ing, security, immigration – to finally beaddressed, and we reserve all politicalmeans of action if this is not the case inthe coming weeks,” National Rally lead-er Jordan Bardella said.Barnier is a staunch pro-Europeanand a moderate career politician,though he toughened his discourseconsiderably during a failed 2021 bid tobecome his conservative party’s presi-dential nominee, saying immigration was out of control.Barnier first became a lawmaker atage 27, and held roles in several Frenchgovernments, including foreign minis-ter and agriculture minister, though hehas been out of political office in Francefor 15 years, spending most of that timeat EU headquarters in Brussels.He is best known abroad for havingled the EU’s talks with Britain over itsexit from the bloc.Macron had considered a string ofpotential prime ministers in recentweeks, none of whom musteredenough support to guarantee a stablegovernment.French bank sharesedged up, governmentborrowing costs fellslightly, and the euronudged higher, in posi-tive signs from financialmarkets following theappointment.Barnier’s politicalviews are overall close to Macron’s, andit was crucial for the French presidentthat his new prime minister not try toundo reforms pushed through over thepast years, in particular pensionchanges that angered the left.It remains unclear if Barnier willfully try to implement Macron’s politi-cal agenda or bring in new proposals.He will need in any case to negotiatewith other parties to get legislationadopted in Parliament.As Macron’s hunt for a prime minis-ter dragged on, public finances deterio-rated, and outgoing Finance MinisterBruno Le Maire has said that tens of bil-lions of euros in budget cuts are neededto plug the hole.Macron’s gamble to call the snapparliamentary election backfired, withhis centrist coalition losing dozens ofseats and no party winning an absolutemajority. Voters did, however, rally todeny the National Rally a victory.National Rally lawmaker Laurent Ja-cobelli said a condition for not oustingBarnier would be that Parliament bedissolved as soon as possible – whichwould be next July. Macron names Brexitnegotiator new PMDivided Parliament a challenge for Barnier Elizabeth Pineau and Ingrid MelanderREUTERS Barnier
3.C.e
Packet Pg. 271 Attachment: Attachment D - Legal Ad & HEX Sign Posting (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.ePacket Pg. 272Attachment: Attachment D - Legal Ad & HEX Sign Posting (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD (SV))
3.C.e
Packet Pg. 273 Attachment: Attachment D - Legal Ad & HEX Sign Posting (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD
3.C.e
Packet Pg. 274 Attachment: Attachment D - Legal Ad & HEX Sign Posting (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD
3.C.e
Packet Pg. 275 Attachment: Attachment D - Legal Ad & HEX Sign Posting (29842 : PL20240007875 - One Naples MPUD