The URL can be used to link to this page

Agenda 09/24/2024 Item # 9C (Resolution- Petition CU-PL20220003008)9/24/2024 Item # 9.C. ID#: 2024-758 Executive Summary This item requires that Commission members provide ex-parte disclosure. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve a Resolution of the Board of Zoning Appeals of Collier County, Florida, providing for the establishment of a conditional use to allow a communications tower on lands zoned Estates (E) within the Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan pursuant to section 2.03.01.B.1.c.12 and sections 5.05.09.E.1 and 5.05.09.H of the Collier County Land Development Code on +0.39 acres of a +5.15 acre tract located at 3147 31st Avenue NE (Parcel 40171120002), at the northeast corner of the intersection of NE 31st Avenue and Everglades Boulevard North, in Section 20, Township 48 South, Range 28 East, Collier County, Florida. (CU-PL20220003008) OBJECTIVE: To have the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) review staff's findings and recommendations along with the recommendations of the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) regarding the above-referenced petition and render a decision regarding the petition and ensure the project is in harmony with all the applicable codes and regulations in order to ensure that the community's interests are maintained. Per Policy 1.1.8 of the Rural Estates Sub Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan adopted in the Growth Management Plan (GMP), to obtain conditional use approval, a super-majority vote (minimum of 4 votes) by the Board of Zoning Appeals is required for approval of this item. CONSIDERATIONS: The request is to install a 180-foot-tall self-supporting telecommunications tower (plus a 4-foot lighting rod) with an associated 50-foot by 50-foot walled compound area at the base of the tower for accessory equipment. The parent parcel is ±5.15 acres and is occupied by a single-family home built in 2022. The site is zoned Estates, and the Future Land Use Map designation is Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict within the Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element in the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. To the north, south, east, and west are single-family residential homes and undeveloped lots, all zoned Estates (E). Access to the tower will be provided off 31st Avenue NE via a 12-foot-wide access drive within a 20-foot-wide access and utility easement, with a second option to access from Everglades Boulevard North via a 20-foot-wide access and utility easement. At the time of the original submittal of this petition, the tower did not meet all of the separation distance requirements applicable to communication towers per the LDC, and a companion Variance petition (PL20220006738) was submitted seeking relief from the required 450-foot separations (2.5 times tower height) to the northern southern, and eastern residential properties. On February 27, 2024, Collier County adopted Ordinance 2024-05, an LDC Amendment related to wireless communication facilities. The LDC was amended to allow “alternative” tower structures to be separated from off-site abutting Residential or Estate uses by 50% of the tower height. Alternative tower structures are defined in LDC Section 5.05.09.D. as manmade trees, clock towers, bell towers, steeples, light poles, and similar alternative mounting structures that accommodate, camouflage, minimize, or conceal the wireless communication facility equipment. In May 2024, the petitioner revised the tower design from a lattice style to an alternative tower structure (monopine), and the required separation distance is now 90 feet, which can be attained on the site. The companion Variance petition is no longer necessary and has been withdrawn. The proposed separation distances now meet or exceed the minimum requirements of the LDC and exceed the fall zone radius of 130 feet per the Certification Letter dated September 21, 2022 (see Attachment B). The tower design has a minimum capability for four service users/carrier’s equipment. FISCAL IMPACT: The conditional use (CU) by and of itself will have no fiscal impact on Collier County. There is no guarantee that the project, at build-out, will maximize its authorized level of development. However, if the CU is approved, a portion of the land could be developed, and the new development will result in an impact on Collier County public facilities. The County collects impact fees prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy to help offset the impact of each new Page 923 of 4908 development on public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund projects identified in the Capital Improvement Element of the GMP as needed to maintain the adopted Level of Service (LOS) for public facilities. Other fees collected prior to issuance of a building permit include building permit review fees. Please note that impact fees and taxes collected were not included in the criteria used by staff and the CCPC to analyze this petition. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: The subject site is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Everglades Blvd. and 31st Ave. NE. It is designated Estates, Mixed Use District, and Residential Estates Subdistrict. The subject site is within the Rural Golden Gate Estates, which is a sub-element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP). According to the Sub-Element, conditional use of a cellular tower is allowed in the Estates Zoning District only on parcels no smaller than 2.25 acres and adjacent to a roadway classified within the Transportation Element as a Collector or Arterial. Based on available information, the lot appears to be just over 5 acres. It is located adjacent to Everglades Blvd., which is classified as a minor collector, allowing the conditional use process without an amendment to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. Staff would also like to note that the existing 5.15-acre parcel is able to be split into two buildable lots, and should a lot split ever be considered in the future, the cell tower must be on property with frontage on Everglades Blvd. so as not to create a non-conformity. Staff recommends as a condition of approval #3: The parent tract shall not be split or altered in any way that would render the tower location to become non-compliant with the conditional use Locational Criteria of the Rural Estates Sub-Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan of the GMP. This proposed project, as conditioned, is consistent with the Golden Gate Area Master Plan of the GMP. According to the information provided by the applicant, the proposed tower facility will generate a de minimis number of maintenance-related trips monthly. Therefore, the conditional use is found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP. Environmental review staff has found this project to be consistent with the Conservation & Coastal Management Element (CCME). The project site consists of 5.15 acres of previously cleared property. The GMP is the prevailing document to support land use decisions, such as this proposed conditional use. Staff is required to make a recommendation regarding a finding of consistency or inconsistency with the overall GMP as part of the recommendation for approval, approval with conditions, or denial of any conditional use petition. Based on the review above, this request, as conditioned, can be found consistent with the GMP. Federal Law It should be noted that Section 704 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, codified at 47 USC 332(c)(7)(B)(iv) (attached in part as Attachment G to this Executive Summary), prohibits environmental concerns (or health concerns) as a reason for denial of cell towers by a local jurisdiction. If denied, it should not be based on health effect, but rather one of the findings specified in LDC Section 10.08.00.D: (1) Consistency with the LDC and GMP; (2) Ingress and egress to the property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe; (3) The effect the conditional use would have on neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects; (4) Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPC) RECOMMENDATION: The CCPC heard Petition CU- PL20220003008 on August 1, 2024, and recommended approval by a vote of 5-1, with Commissioner Schumacher opposed. Commissioner Schumacher summarized that he dissented because the monopine would be incompatible, considering there are no other towers and no substantial foliage in the surrounding area and because there was no solid evidence that the service is failing in the area. Two property owners spoke in opposition to the petition with concerns about health impacts and property values. One property owner noted that cellular service failures are not an issue at his home down the street from the proposed tower location. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: Before you, there is a recommendation by the CCPC for approval of a conditional use authorizing a telecommunications tower within the Estates (E) zoning district. A conditional use is a use that is permitted in a particular zoning district subject to certain restrictions. All testimony given must be under oath. The attached report and recommendations of the CCPC are advisory only and are not binding on you. The petitioner has the burden of demonstrating that the necessary requirements have been met, and you may question the petitioner or staff to satisfy yourself that the necessary criteria have been satisfied. In addition to meeting the necessary criteria, you may Page 924 of 4908 place such conditions and safeguards as you deem appropriate to allow the use, provided that there is competent, substantial evidence that these additional conditions and safeguards are necessary to promote the public health, safety, welfare, morals, order, comfort, convenience, appearance, or the general welfare of the neighborhood. As a further condition of approval of the conditional use, you may require that suitable areas for streets, public rights-of-way, schools, parks, and other public facilities be set aside, improved, and/or dedicated for public use, subject to appropriate impact fee credits. Approval or denial of the petition is by Resolution. Should this item be denied, Florida Statutes section 125.022(3) requires the County to provide written notice to the applicant citing applicable portions of an ordinance, rule, statute, or other legal authority for the denial. This item has been approved as to form and legality, and requires an affirmative vote of four for BZA approval. (HFAC) RECOMMENDATIONS: To approve Petition CU-PL20220003008, subject to the three conditions as recommended by the CCPC and incorporated in the Resolution. PREPARED BY: Ray Bellows, Zoning Manager ATTACHMENTS: 1. Staff Report CCPC 2. Att A - Resolution 3. Att B - 25 9747_Palmetto Ridge_Fall Letter_09_21_22 (1) 4. Att C - Mosquito Control correspondence - 9-12-2022 5. Att D -02 US FL 5283 Palmetto Ridge Diligent Search Aff 6. Att E - Applicants Backup 7. Att F - NIM correspondence & documentation 8. Att G - Telecommunications Act - in part 9. Att H - applicants prop value study - bridger tower corporation (Temp) (Converted) 10. Affidavit and Sign Photos 11. legal ads - agenda ID 29728 (24-758) Bridger Tower Corp CU-PL20220003008 Page 925 of 4908 CU-PL20220003008 PALMETTO RIDGE 2 TOWER CONDITIONAL USE Page 1 of 13 August 15, 2024 STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ZONING DIVISION – ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: AUGUST 1, 2024 SUBJECT: PL20220003008; PALMETTO RIDGE 2 TOWER CONDITIONAL USE PROPERTY OWNER/AGENT: Owner: Carlos J Meran Agent(s): Mattaniah S. Jahn, Esq. 3147 31st Ave NE Mattaniah S. Jahn, P.A. Naples, FL 34120 935 Main Street, Suite C4 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 Petitioner: Bridger Tower Corporation 1951 East 400th Road Lecompton, KS 66050 ** Ordinance 2024-05, adopted at the February 27, 2024, Board of County Commissioner meeting, includes updates to Wireless Communication Facilities Land Development Code (LDC) 5.05.09. To view the Ordinance, please refer to the LDC's Home page under Adopted Ordinances Not Yet Codified . REQUESTED ACTION: The petitioner requests that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider a Conditional Use petition to allow a wireless communication facility on lands zoned Estates within the Rural Golden Gate Estates, pursuant to Section 2.03.01 B.1.c.12 and Section 5.05.09 E.1 and 5.05.09.H. of the Land Development Code (LDC). Per Policy 1.1.8 of the Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan adopted in the Growth Management Plan, to obtain conditional use approval, a super-majority vote (minimum of 4 votes) by the Board of Zoning Appeals shall be required. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The site is located at 3147 31st Avenue NE (Parcel No. 40171120002), at the northeast corner of the intersection of NE 31st Avenue and Everglades Boulevard North in Section 20, Township 48 South, Range 28 East, Collier County, Florida. (See location map on the following page.) Page 926 of 4908 CU-PL20220003008 PALMETTO RIDGE 2 TOWER CONDITIONAL USE Page 2 of 13 August 15, 2024 Page 927 of 4908 CU-PL20220003008 PALMETTO RIDGE 2 TOWER CONDITIONAL USE Page 3 of 13 August 15, 2024 PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The petitioner seeks a Conditional Use for a telecommunications tower per LDC Section 2.03.01 B.1.c.12, subject to LDC Section 5.05.09. The request is to install a 180-ft self-supporting telecommunications tower (plus a 4-foot lighting rod) with an associated 50-foot by 50-foot walled compound area at the base of the tower for accessory equipment. The parent parcel is ±5.15 acres and is occupied with a single-family home built in 2022. The site is zoned Estates, and the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) designation is Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict within the Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element in the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP). The proposed tower is expected to generate minimal traffic, with site technicians anticipated making approximately 10 to 12 trips per year for regular maintenance. Access to the tower will be provided off 31st Avenue NE via a 12-foot-wide access drive within a 20-foot-wide access and utility easement, with a second option to access from Everglades Boulevard North via a 20-foot-wide access and utility easement. At the time of the original submittal of this petition, the tower did not meet all of the separation distance requirements applicable to communication towers per the LDC, and a companion Variance petition, PL20220006738, was submitted seeking relief from the required 450-foot separations (2.5 times tower height) to the northern southern, and eastern residential properties. On February 27, 2024, Collier County adopted Ordinance 2024-05, an LDC Amendment related to wireless communication facilities. The LDC was amended to allow “alternative” tower structures to be separated from off-site abutting Residential or Estate uses by 50% of the tower height. Alternative tower structures are defined in the LDC Section 5.05.09.D. as manmade trees, clock towers, bell towers, steeples, light poles, and similar alternative mounting structures that accommodate, camouflage, minimize, or conceal the wireless communication facility equipment. In May 2024, the petitioner revised the tower design from a lattice style to an alternative tower structure (monopine), and the required separation distance is now 90-feet, which can be attained on the site. Due to these changes, the companion Variance petition is no longer necessary and has been withdrawn. The proposed separation distances now meet or exceed the LDC's minimum requirements and the fall zone radius of 130 feet per the Certification Letter dated September 21, 2022 (see Attachment B). Separation from: Past LDC Minimum Separation per 5.05.09.G.7.b and c Current LDC Minimum Separation Per 5.05.09. F.2. c. Proposed Separation Property to North (Estates / residential) 180’ x 2.5 = 450’ 180’ x 0.5 = 90’ 147’-10” Property to East (Estates / residential) 180’ x 2.5 = 450’ 180’ x 0.5 = 90’ 197’-9” Property to West (Estates / residential) 180’ x 2.5 = 450’ 180’ x 0.5 = 90’ 477’-9” Property to South (Estates / residential) 180’ x 2.5 = 450’ 180’ x 0.5 = 90’ 177’-8” On-site residence n/a n/a 215’ Page 928 of 4908 CU-PL20220003008 PALMETTO RIDGE 2 TOWER CONDITIONAL USE Page 4 of 13 August 15, 2024 Page 929 of 4908 CU-PL20220003008 PALMETTO RIDGE 2 TOWER CONDITIONAL USE Page 5 of 13 August 15, 2024 SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: This section of the staff report identifies the land uses and zoning classifications for properties surrounding the boundaries of the subject property, which is developed with a single-family home and zoned Estates (E): North: Single-family residential, zoned Estates (E) East: Single-family residential, zoned Estates (E) South: Single-family residential and vacant/undeveloped residential, zoned Estates (E) West: Single-family residential and vacant/undeveloped residential, zoned Estates (E) Page 930 of 4908 CU-PL20220003008 PALMETTO RIDGE 2 TOWER CONDITIONAL USE Page 6 of 13 August 15, 2024 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: Future Land Use Element (FLUE): The subject site is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Everglades Blvd. and 31st Ave. NE. It is designated Estates, Mixed Use District, and Residential Estates Subdistrict. The subject site is within the Rural Golden Gate Estates, which is a sub- element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP). According to the Sub-Element, a Conditional Use for a cellular tower is allowed in the Estates Zoning District only on parcels not smaller than ±2.25-acres and adjacent to a roadway classified within the Transportation Element as a Collector or Arterial. Based on available information, the lot is 5.15 acres and is located adjacent to Everglades Blvd., which is classified as a Minor Collector, allowing the Conditional Use process without an amendment to the GGAMP. Staff would also like to note that the existing ±5.15-acre parcel is able to be split into two buildable lots, and should a lot split ever be considered in the future, the cell tower must be on property with frontage on Everglades Blvd. so as not to create a non-conformity. Staff recommends as a condition of approval #3: The parent tract shall not be split or altered in any way that would render the tower location to become non-compliant with the Conditional Use Locational Criteria of the Rural Estates Sub -Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan of the Growth Management Plan. This proposed project, as conditioned, is consistent with the Golden Gate Area Master Plan of the Growth Management Plan. Transportation Element: The project is consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan, which states, “The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and c. For all other links, the project traffic is considered significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project’s significant impacts on all roadways.” This proposed communication tower is like other un-manned tower facilities that generate a de minimis number of monthly maintenance-related trips. Usually, this can be ±6 monthly trips, depending on the Page 931 of 4908 CU-PL20220003008 PALMETTO RIDGE 2 TOWER CONDITIONAL USE Page 7 of 13 August 15, 2024 facility. Therefore, the subject Conditional Use is found to be consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan. Conservation & Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental review staff has found this project to be consistent with the Conservation & Coastal Management Element (CCME). The project site consists of ±5.15-acres of previously cleared property. Federal Law It should be noted that Section 704 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, codified at 47 USC 332(c)(7)(B)(iv), prohibits environmental concerns (or health concerns) as a reason for denial of cell towers by a local jurisdiction. If the CCPC recommends denial of the petition, it should not be based on health effects but rather on one of the five areas of analysis below for Conditional Use. STAFF ANALYSIS: Staff has completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition, including the criteria on which a recommendation must be based. This evaluation is completed as part of the Conditional Use Findings provided below. In addition, staff offers the following analyses: Environmental Review: Environmental Services staff has reviewed the Conditional Use petition to address environmental concerns. The property had been historically cleared and maintained clear of native vegetation with an existing single-family home. The PUD Master Plan does not show a Preserve since no minimum preservation is required. No listed animal species were observed on the property. Environmental Services staff recommends approval. Transportation Review: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petition request and is recommending approval. Landscape Review: Buffers labeled on the Conceptual Site Plan are consistent with the LDC. Final fence/wall and landscaping plans are reviewed at the time of site development plan permitting. Mosquito Control District Review: Per LDC Section 5.05.09.I.3., because the proposed tower is greater than 150 feet in height, the applicant must supply a copy of the application to the Collier Mosquito Control District or designee. The application was supplied as required, see Attachment C. Per the submitted correspondence with Collier Mosquito Control District Executive Director, staff recommends as condition of approval #1: The petitioner shall submit proof of notice to the Collier County Mosquito Control District of the project commencement date when known prior to issuance of a building permit. Conditional Use Findings: Before any conditional use recommendation can be offered to the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA), the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) must make findings that: 1) approval of the conditional use will not adversely affect the public, and 2) all specific requirements for the individual conditional use will be met; and 3) satisfactory provisions have been made concerning the following matters, where applicable Page 932 of 4908 CU-PL20220003008 PALMETTO RIDGE 2 TOWER CONDITIONAL USE Page 8 of 13 August 15, 2024 1. Section 2.03.01 B.1.c.12 of the LDC permits communication towers as conditional uses, subject to LDC Section 5.05.09. The requested use for a wireless communication facility is allowed as a conditional use in the Estates zoning district, subject to the standards and procedures established in Section 10. 08.00, Conditional Uses Procedures, and 5.05.09, Wireless Communication Facilities, of the LDC. 2. Consistency with the Land Development Code (LDC) and the Growth Management Plan (GMP). Staff has found this request is consistent with the Growth Management Plan (GMP). The development of conditional uses shall be in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Land Development Code (LDC). Per LDC Section 5.05.09.F.2.b., the maximum allowable tower height is dependent upon the number of providers accommodated on the tower. The tower is designed to support up to four providers (Verizon plus three others), which corresponds to a maximum height of 185- feet. Lightning rods may exceed the height limitation provided the rods are no greater than 10 -feet in length. The proposed height of 180-feet plus a 4-foot lightning rod conforms to the LDC. Per LDC Section 5.05.09.F.2.c., separation requirements from off-site abutting uses are 100% of tower height or 50% of tower height if an alternative tower structure is proposed. Because the tower is proposed as a monopine design, the minimum separation requirement is 90 feet, and the proposed separation distances meet or exceed the minimum requirements of the LDC . The proposed separation distances also exceed the fall zone radius of 130-feet per the Certification Letter dated September 21, 2022, which the agent advised is still applicable to the monopine structure. Screening, landscaping, and parking standards are enumerated in LDC Sections 5.05.09.F.2.g., h. and i. The proposed 8-foot-tall wall around the 50’ by 50’ compound meets the screening standards. Overall height of ground-mounted equipment shall not exceed 12-feet. Dimensions of the equipment cabinets are reviewed against this standard at the time of site development plan and building permitting. The proposed 15-foot-wide landscape buffer will meet the landscaping requirement of a minimum 10-foot-wide Type A buffer that includes a 3-foot high, continuous hedge planted 3 feet on center with trees at least 12-feet in height at time of planting along the outside perimeter of the wall. Final fence/wall and landscaping plans are reviewed against these standards at the time of site development plan permitting. The proposed access easement and single parking space meet the requirement for towers that are 185-feet in height or less. Additional standards apply to wireless communication facilities in the Estates Zoning District. These standards are found in LDC Section 5.05.09.H. and are evaluated below: a. The parcel is a minimum ±2.25 acres and adjacent to an arterial or collector road. This criterion is met because the parcel is ±5.15 acres and is located adjacent to Everglades Blvd N., which is classified on the FDOT District One – Map B3, Federal Functional Classification Map as a Minor Collector. Page 933 of 4908 CU-PL20220003008 PALMETTO RIDGE 2 TOWER CONDITIONAL USE Page 9 of 13 August 15, 2024 b. The wireless communication facility’s provider has provided evidence that the service provider's search radius for the tower location requires placement of the tower in the Estates Zoning District to meet its coverage requirements and that the wireless communication facility cannot be co-located on an existing tower and provide the same quality service coverage. Per LDC Section 5.05.09 D.4, the search radius area means the limited area certified by the provider’s Radio Frequency Engineer within which the proposed wireless communication facility needs to be located in order to resolve the provider’s coverage and/or capacity issues in the surrounding area. There is no standard numeric distance for a search radius; instead, the search radius for a particular site depends on many factors, including, but not limited to, the population to be served, geography, and topography. See Attachment D for the petitioner’s required “No Alternative Towers Affidavit” with supporting documents identifying search radii for Verizon (Anchor Tenant) and AT&T. The Radio Frequency (RF) Justification Package includes an explanation for the need to place the tower in the Estates Zoning District to provide adequate service and address customer complaints due to coverage and capacity issues. The petitioner asserts that “The proposed site will significantly enhance the coverage and capacity need in the area and will bring significant network performance improvements to the existing and future residents of this area. There are no existing structures in the area that could support the installation of the Verizon Wireless equipment needed.” Supplemental application requirements apply to wireless communication facilities in the Estates Zoning District. These requirements are found in LDC Section 5.05.09.I.1. and are evaluated below: a. Evidence from a Radio Frequency Engineer that the proposed facilities cannot be installed on another structure in Collier County and shall be located at the proposed site to meet coverage requirements with a composite propagation study illustrating, graphically, existing and proposed coverage in industry-accepted median received signal ranges. See Attachment D for the petitioner’s required “No Alternative Towers Affidavit” with supporting Radio Frequency (RF) Justification Package, which includes an explanation for the need to place the tower in the Estates Zoning District to provide adequate service and address customer complaints due to coverage and capacity issues. The RF Justification Package includes graphics illustrating existing and proposed coverage and asserts that “The proposed site will significantly enhance the coverage and capacity need in the area and will bring significant network performance improvements to the existing and future residents of this area. There are no existing structures in the area that could support the installation of the Verizon Wireless equipment needed.” b. If co-location is not available, the applicant shall submit an affidavit stating that the applicant made diligent efforts for permission to install or co-locate the Wireless Communication Facility (WCF) on all existing support structures located within the search radius for the proposed tower. The applicant shall establish in the application that they are unable to provide service at existing sites nearby, no other existing tower is available (including utility poles); and that no Page 934 of 4908 CU-PL20220003008 PALMETTO RIDGE 2 TOWER CONDITIONAL USE Page 10 of 13 August 15, 2024 reasonable alternative technology can accommodate the WCF due to one or more of the following factors: (six factors are listed but not re-stated here for brevity) See Attachment D for the petitioner’s required “No Alternative Towers Affidavit” with supporting Radio Frequency (RF) Justification Package, which states, “There are no existing structures in the area that could support the installation of the Verizon Wireless equipment needed.” The Affidavit indicates the limiting factor for co-location is no facilities with sufficient height are in the geographic search area to meet Verizon Wireless’ RF objectives. Per LDC Section 5.05.09.I.3. Because the proposed tower is greater than 150 feet in height, the applicant must supply a copy of the application to the Collier Mosquito Control District or designee. Per the submitted correspondence with the Collier Mosquito Control District Executive Director, the District requests the petitioner advise of the project commencement date when known , which staff recommends as a condition of approval #1. 3. Ingress and egress to the property and proposed structures thereon, with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe. Ingress/egress is proposed via a 20-foot-wide access and utility easement off 31st Avenue NE, with a secondary access option off Everglades Boulevard North along the northern property line. The applicant states that the use will generate approximately 10 to 12 anticipated trips per year by site technicians. The 50-foot by 50-foot compound at the base of the tower is proposed to have gates for security. 4. The effect the Conditional Use would have on neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects. The communication tower is an unmanned facility and is not anticipated to generate noise, odor, or glare. No signals, lighting, or illumination is permitted on towers unless required by the FAA or other applicable authority. Site lighting cannot be more than 20-feet above grade, must be fully shielded, and directed downward away from neighboring properties. The tower is not proposed to be illuminated, and the design of the tower is proposed as a monopine to ameliorate the visual impact upon the surrounding properties. The tower is anticipated to improve wireless communication capacity and service levels in the area, which not only positively affects economic opportunities but also increases safety within the area with improved coverage and call stability for emergency situations. 5. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other properties in the district. The 130-foot projected fall zone radius for the tower is completely contained within the boundaries of the parent parcel and is outside of the existing single-family dwelling on the parent parcel. A tower will generate far fewer trips than other uses that are permitted or conditional in the Estates zoning district. The applicant has attempted to ameliorate the visual impact of the tower by proposing a monopine type of tower. The applicant provided several photo simulation images to portray the appearance of the tower from different vantage points. One view is below from the intersection of Everglades Blvd and 31st Avenue NE, looking northeast. Page 935 of 4908 CU-PL20220003008 PALMETTO RIDGE 2 TOWER CONDITIONAL USE Page 11 of 13 August 15, 2024 Minimum separation distances are established in the LDC to address compatibility with abutting uses in proximity to a proposed tower. The proposed tower complies with the newly adopted minimum separation distance requirements from abutting uses per LDC Section 5.05.09.F.2.c.. Towers within the Estates Zoning District must be separated from the property line of abutting uses by at least 100% of the tower height unless an alternative tower structure is proposed, whereby the separation distances shall be reduced to 50% of the tower height. The petitioner is proposing a 180- ft tall monopine tower design which is classified as an “alternative tower structure” since it camouflages and minimizes the presence of wireless communication facility equipment. As such, the minimum required separation distance is 90 feet from abutting property lines; the proposed tower meets this requirement in all directions. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) RECOMMENDATION: This project does not require an Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as it did not meet the EAC's scope of land development project reviews as identified in Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): The NIM was held on February 8, 2024, at Big Corkscrew Island Regional Park Community Center, 810 39th Ave NE. Approximately 12 members of the public attended. Virtual attendance was also available via Zoom, although there were no Zoom participants. The meeting commenced at 6:00 p.m. and ended at 7:04 p.m. The petitioner’s agent, Mattaniah S. Jahn, presented information about the proposed wireless communication facility and the justification for the Conditional Use and Variance approvals. [NOTE: At Page 936 of 4908 CU-PL20220003008 PALMETTO RIDGE 2 TOWER CONDITIONAL USE Page 12 of 13 August 15, 2024 the time of the NIM, the applicant was still proposing a 180-ft tall lattice-style tower, which required a distance separation of 2.5 times the height of the tower prior to the adoption of Ordinance 2024-05]. The agent explained the challenges in meeting the communication tower separation requirements from the abutting residential parcels due to the lack of larger parcels in the surrounding area within the Estates zoning district. Attendees asked how many communication tower projects the applicant has in Collier County and how many within the Estates zoning district. Concerns were raised about potential impacts from radio frequency (RF) waves on surrounding residents and the unsightliness of the tower in the neighborhood. Other concerns were raised regarding the impact on property values, the marketability of property near a tower, and the aesthetics of the area. Some attendees expressed support for the possibility of cell phone coverage but concern about potential radiation and the safety of the community. Some attendees expressed interest in a tower designed to look like a tree, similar to a recently constructed tower at 4111 Green Boulevard near Golden Gate City. In response to comments from attendees, the agent committed to follow-up to address these topics: - Information on RF safety - Request the commissioning of a Non-Ionizing Electromagnetic Radiation (NIER) Report to show how the signal broadcasts - Determine if the design could be changed from lattice to a treelike design, similar to the tower on Green Boulevard at the edge of Golden Gate City. The agent followed up by email to an attendee of the NIM on May 9, 2024, indicating that Verizon didn’t authorize a full NIER study for the project but shared a link to the Federal Communications Commission webpage on communication tower and wireless device safety for the public. Also, the agent advised that the design of the project changed from a lattice to a monopine, like the Green Boulevard tower, and provided new photo-simulations of the monopine design and revised plans for the monopine design. See Attachment F for the documentation of the NIM, including the follow-up by the agent to address concerns raised at the NIM. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney's Office reviewed this staff report on July 2, 2024. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) recommend approval of Petition CU-20220003008, Palmetto Ridge 2 Tower, to the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA), subject to the following conditions: 1. The petitioner shall submit proof of notice to the Collier County Mosquito Control District of the project commencement date when known prior to issuance of a building permit. 2. Bridger Tower Corporation, its successors, or assigns shall maintain the tower as a monopine style tower, and shall maintain the tower (including, but not limited to, the tree branch canopy) in good condition and repair in accordance with the appearance and condition at time of installation. Page 937 of 4908 CU-PL20220003008 PALMETTO RIDGE 2 TOWER CONDITIONAL USE Page 13 of 13 August 15, 2024 3. The leased area designated for the location of the cellular tower and access to the cellular tower is on a 5.15-acre parent tract, which conforms to the Conditional Use Locational Criteria of the Rural Estates Sub-Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan of the Growth Management Plan because the parcel is no smaller than 2.25 acres and is adjacent to Everglades Blvd, which is classified as a minor collector. The parent tract shall not be split or altered in any way that would render the tower location to become non-compliant with the Conditional Use Locational Criteria of the Rural Estates Sub-Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan of the Growth Management Plan. Attachments: A. Draft Resolution B. Fall Zone Certification Letter dated September 21, 2022 C. Mosquito Control District correspondence D. Petitioner’s No Alternative Towers Affidavit, including RF Justification Package E. Application/Backup documents F. NIM Documentation Page 938 of 4908 [22-CPS-02289/1876197/1]63 Bridger – Palmetto Ridge II PL20220003008 7/2/24R 1 of 2 RESOLUTION NO. 2024- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CONDITIONAL USE TO ALLOW A WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY ON LANDS ZONED ESTATES (E) WITHIN THE RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SUB-ELEMENT OF THE GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN ELEMENT OF THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN PURSUANT TO SECTION 2.03.01.B.1.c.12 AND SECTIONS 5.05.09.E.1 AND 5.05.09.H OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE ON .39± ACRES OF A 5.15+/- ACRE TRACT LOCATED AT 3147 31ST AVENUE NE (PARCEL 40171120002), AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF NE 31ST AVENUE AND EVERGLADES BOULEVARD NORTH, IN SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. (PL20220003008) WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 67–1246, Laws of Florida, and Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on Collier County the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended) which includes a Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance establishing regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of Conditional Uses; and WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Appeals (Board), being the duly appointed and constituted planning board for the area hereby affected, has held a public hearing after notice as in said regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisability of a Conditional Use to allow a wireless communications facility on lands zoned Estates (E) within the Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan pursuant to Section 2.03.01.B.1.c.12 and Sections 5.05.09.E.1 and 5.05.09.H of the Collier County Land Development Code on the property hereinafter described, and the Collier County Planning Commission has made findings that the granting of the Conditional Use will not adversely affect the public interest and the specific requirements governing the Conditional Use have been met and that satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations and in accordance with Subsection 10.08.00.D. of the Land Development Code; and Page 939 of 4908 WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this Board in a public meeting assembled and the Board having considered all matters presented. NOW. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF COLLIER COLINTY, FLORIDA that: Petition Number PL20220003008 filed by Bridger Tower Corp., with respect to the property hereinafter described in Exhibit A, be and the same is hereby approved for a Conditional Use to allow a wireless communications facility on lands zoned Estates (E) within the Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan pursuant 1o Section 2.03.01 .B. I .c.12 and Sections 5.05.09.8.1 and 5.05.09.H olthe Collier County Land Development Code, in accordance with the Conceptual Site Plan described in Exhibit B, and subject to the conditions in Exhibit C. Exhibits A, B, and C are attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of this Board. This Resolution adopted after motion, second, and super-majority vote, this _ day of 2024. ATTEST: CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK By , Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legality: Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attomey Attachments: Exhibit A - Legal Description Exhibit B - Conceptual Site plan Exhibit C - Conditions of Approval fzz-cYs-ozzts t nt e st r rlot Bridger - Palmetto Ridge II PL20220003008 1/2/24 BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS COLLIER COLJNTY, FLORIDA By: Chris Hall. Chairman 2of2 Page 940 of 4908 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION: 75'X75' BRIDGER CELL ASSETS, LLC LEASE AREA (AS REQUESTED BY CLIENT) A PARCEL OF LAND LYING WITHIN SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST LINE OF TRACT 15, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT NO. 68, PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 90, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AND THE NORTH ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT LINE OF 31ST AVENUE NE, BEING MARKED BY A FOUND 5/8" IRON ROD (NO IDENTIFICATION); THENCE S89°35'44"W, DEPARTING THE EAST LINE OF SAID TRACT 15, AND ALONG THE NORTH ROAD RIGHT- OF-WAY EASEMENT LINE OF SAID 31ST AVENUE NE, A DISTANCE OF 190.18 FEET; THENCE CONTINUE S89º35'44"W, ALONG THE NORTH ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT LINE OF SAID 31ST AVENUE NW, A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET; THENCE N00°24'16"W, DEPARTING THE NORTH ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT LINE OF SAID 31ST AVENUE NE, A DISTANCE OF 112.60 FEET; THENCE S89°35'44"W, A DISTANCE OF 27.50 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE N00°24'16"W, A DISTANCE OF 75.00 FEET; THENCE N89°35'44"E, A DISTANCE OF 75.00 FEET; THENCE S00°24'16"E, A DISTANCE OF 75.00 FEET; THENCE S89°35'44"W, A DISTANCE OF 75.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PROPOSED 75'X75' BRIDGER CELL ASSETS, LLC LEASE AREA CONTAINING 5,625 SQUARE FEET. DESCRIPTION: 20' WIDE NON-EXCLUSIVE BRIDGER CELL ASSETS, LLC ACCESS & UTILITY EASEMENT "A" (AS REQUESTED BY CLIENT) A STRIP OF LAND LYING WITHIN SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST LINE OF TRACT 15, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT NO. 68, PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 90, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AND THE NORTH ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT LINE OF 31ST AVENUE NE, BEING MARKED BY A FOUND 5/8" IRON ROD (NO IDENTIFICATION); THENCE S89°35'44"W, DEPARTING THE EAST LINE OF SAID TRACT 15, AND ALONG THE NORTH ROAD RIGHT- OF-WAY EASEMENT LINE OF SAID 31ST AVENUE NE, A DISTANCE OF 190.18 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE S89°35'44"W, ALONG THE NORTH ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT LINE OF SAID 31ST AVENUE NE, A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET; THENCE N00°24'16"W, DEPARTING THE NORTH ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT LINE OF SAID 31ST AVENUE NE, A DISTANCE OF 112.60 FEET; THENCE N89°35'44"E, A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET; THENCE S00°24'16"E, A DISTANCE OF 112.60 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID 20' WIDE NON-EXCLUSIVE BRIDGER CELL ASSETS, LLC ACCESS & UTILITY EASEMENT "A" CONTAINING 2,252 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. DESCRIPTION: 20' WIDE NON-EXCLUSIVE BRIDGER CELL ASSETS, LLC ACCESS & UTILITY EASEMENT "B" (AS REQUESTED BY CLIENT) Page 1 of 3 Page 941 of 4908 A STRIP OF LAND LYING WITHIN SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST LINE OF TRACT 15, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT NO. 68, PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 90, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AND THE NORTH ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT LINE OF 31ST AVENUE NE, BEING MARKED BY A FOUND 5/8" IRON ROD (NO IDENTIFICATION); THENCE S89°35'44"W, DEPARTING THE EAST LINE OF SAID TRACT 15, AND ALONG THE NORTH ROAD RIGHT- OF-WAY EASEMENT LINE OF SAID 31ST AVENUE NE, A DISTANCE OF 190.18 FEET; THENCE CONTINUE S89º35'44"W, ALONG THE NORTH ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT LINE OF SAID 31ST AVENUE NW, A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET; THENCE N00°24'16"W, DEPARTING THE NORTH ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT LINE OF SAID 31ST AVENUE NE, A DISTANCE OF 112.60 FEET; THENCE S89°35'44"W, A DISTANCE OF 27.50 FEET; THENCE N00°24'16"W, A DISTANCE OF 75.00 FEET; THENCE N89º35'44"E, A DISTANCE OF 27.50 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE N00°24'40"W, A DISTANCE OF 92.60 FEET; THENCE S89°35'20"W, A DISTANCE OF 350.70 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT LINE OF EVERGLADES BOULEVARD N, PER OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 4312, PAGE 3966, INSTRUMENT NUMBER 4107945, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE N00°26'54"W, ALONG THE EAST ROAD RIGHT-OF- WAY EASEMENT LINE OF SAID EVERGLADES BOULEVARD N, A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 15, BEING MARKED BY A FOUND 5/8" IRON ROD LB 8357; THENCE N89°35'20"E, DEPARTING THE EAST ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT LINE OF SAID EVERGLADES BOULEVARD N, AND ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 15, A DISTANCE OF 370.72 FEET; THENCE S00°24'40"E, DEPARTING THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 15, A DISTANCE OF 112.60 FEET; THENCE S89°35'44"W, A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID 20' WIDE NON-EXCLUSIVE BRIDGER CELL ASSETS, LLC ACCESS & UTILITY EASEMENT "B" CONTAINING 9,266 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. Page 2 of 3 Page 942 of 4908 Page 3 of 3Page 943 of 4908 Page 944 of 4908 TOWER ELEVATIONIT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON,UNLESS THEY ARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTIONOF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER,TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.ISSUED FOR:US-FL-5283PALMETTO RIDGE 2TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALSOFFICE: (313) 425-1570TAMPA, FL 336105906 BRECKENRIDGE PARKWAYwww.tepgroup.netSEAL:SHEET TITLE:SHEET NUMBER: REVISION:TEP #:258947.4852518603-17-23NMC3147 31ST AVE. NENAPLES, FL 34120(COLLIER COUNTY)PL20220003008PL20220006738REVISED ZONINGREVISED ZONINGREVISED ZONINGNMCNMCNMCNMCNMC7806-19-2305-07-24SUITE A05-07-24REVISED ZONINGNMCAUW402-03-23REVISED ZONING NMCAUW5 03-07-23Z-5TOWER ELEVATIONTOWER NOTES:Page 945 of 4908 2 J Exhibit C Conditions of ApproYal The petitioner shall submit to County proof of written notice ofthe project commencement date to the Collier County Mosquito Control District prior to issuance of a building permit. Bridger Tower Corporation, its successors or assigns, shall maintain the tower as a monopine style tower, (including, but not limited to, the tree branch canopy) in good condition and repair in accordance with the appearance and condition at the time of installation. The leased area designated for location ofthe cellular tower and access to the cellular tower is on a .39* acre area of a 5. I S-acre parent tract which conforms to the Conditional Use Locational Criteria of the Rural Estates Sub Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan of the Growth Management Plan, because the parcel is no smaller than 2.25 acres and is adjacent to Everglades Blvd, which is classified as a minor collector. The parent tract shall not be split or altered in any way that would render the tower location to become noncompliant with the Conditional Use Locational Criteria of the Rural Estates Sub Element ol the Golden Gate Area Master Plan of the Growth Management Plan. 122 -CP S -O22A9 h A7 5259 t 1 16 1 7 t2124 Page 946 of 4908 September 21, 2022 Chad Krahel B+T Group Bridger Cell Assets LLC 1717 S. Boulder, Suite 300 750 Park Of Commerce Drive, Suite 200 Tulsa, OK 74119 Boca Raton, Florida 33487 (918) 587-4630 btwo@btgrp.com Subject: Fall Certification Letter Arcosa Designation: Arcosa Project Number: 9747 Arcosa Site Name: Palmetto Ridge (US-FL-5283) Engineering Firm Designation: B+T Group Project Number: 165667.001.01 Site Data: Palmetto Ridge (US-FL-5283) 180’ Self Support Tower To Whom it May Concern: As Requested by Arcosa Telecom Structures on behalf of Bridger Cell Assets LLC, B+T Group is pleased to submit this “Fall Certification Letter” for the 180’ Self Support Tower to be constructed at the Palmetto Ridge (US-FL-5283) site. This tower will be designed in accordance with the TIA 222-H standard for Collier County, FL. The tower will be designed to support antennas and transmission lines for five wireless carriers. The design criteria are more particularly described as follows: Design Wind Speed: 156mph 3-sec gust (no ice) Structure Class: II Exposure Category: C Topographic Category: 1 180’—Wireless Carrier 1 (CaAa= 40,000 sq in w/ (12) 1 5/8” transmission lines 170’—Wireless Carrier 2 (CaAa= 30,000 sq in w/ (12) 1 5/8” transmission lines 160’—Wireless Carrier 3 (CaAa= 30,000 sq in w/ (12) 1 5/8” transmission lines 150’—Wireless Carrier 4 (CaAa= 30,000 sq in w/ (12) 1 5/8” transmission lines 140’—Wireless Carrier 5 (CaAa= 20,000 sq in w/ (12) 1 5/8” transmission lines It is our understanding that this Self Support Tower structure will be designed such that, if a failure were to occur due to a significant storm or other event, the tower would fall within a radius of 130’ from the base of the structure. Although the tower would not be designed to fail, stronger sections that required by analysis would be provided in the lower sections of the tower, resulting in an increased safety factor in the lower sections. In the highly unlikely event that this tower were to experience operational failure due to catastrophic wind loading, the design would enable the tower to fail through compression buckling. Failure in this manner would result in the upper portion of the tower buckling and folding over the lower portion, resulting in a fall radius of 130’ from the base of the tower. It should be understood that this opinion does not consider unpredictable extreme catastrophic events for which the structure is not designed. However, any damage to surrounding property caused by the tower failing during such an event would be relatively insignificant when compared to the damage caused to the surrounding property by the event itself. Please contact us should you have any questions concerning the safety and design of the self support tower. Fall certification letter prepared by: Isaac Fulton Respectfully submitted by: B+T Engineering, Inc Chad Tuttle P.E. Page 947 of 4908 1 Nick Constantine From:Patrick Linn <PLinn@cmcd.org> on behalf of Patrick Linn Sent:Monday, September 12, 2022 11:33 AM To:Nick Constantine Cc:Robin King; Kevin Dunleavy; Keira Lucas; Mark Prince Subject:RE: Cell Tower in Collier County Good afternoon Nick: Per our phone conversation of Friday, this note will serve as the Collier Mosquito Control District’s (the District) approval of the cell tower construction plans you sent on the same day. As we discussed, the District’s only concerns regarding projects such as this one relate to the safety of aerial mosquito control activities in the area of the newly constructed tower. We thank you for including the construction plans and location information for this project. Please advise of the project commencement date when known. Thanks for reaching out and best for a pleasant day, Patrick Linn, MS, MSHAPI Executive Director Collier Mosquito Control District 600 North Road, Naples, FL 34104 239.434.4646 | Direct 239.436.1000 | Main 239.436.1005 | Fax www.cmcd.org Under Florida law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by phone or in writing. From: Nick Constantine <nconstantine@tepgroup.net> Sent: Friday, September 9, 2022 12:43 PM To: Patrick Linn <PLinn@cmcd.org> Cc: Robin King <RKing@cmcd.org>; Kevin Dunleavy <KDunleavy@cmcd.org>; Keira Lucas <klucas@cmcd.org>; Mark Prince <MPrince@cmcd.org> Subject: RE: Cell Tower in Collier County Patrick, Page 948 of 4908 2 Not sure if I should just submit this letter to the County with the rest of our submittal docs or if I should send this to you first for you to provide approval and or comments. Just noticed county comments said provide Mosquito Control “Approval” so sending to you first for review/approval. Thanks _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Nicholas M. Constantine, P.E. Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. (www.tepgroup.net) 500 East 84th Ave, Unit C-10, Thornton, CO 80229 |Office: (303) 566-9918 | Fax: (303) 566-9916 |Mobile: (518) 852-1175 Civil|Surveying|Environmental|PM&E|Structural|Inspections|Geotechnical and Material Testing|Construction|Renewable Energy|Fiber|Site Acquisition From: Patrick Linn <PLinn@cmcd.org> Sent: Friday, September 9, 2022 7:59 AM To: Nick Constantine <nconstantine@tepgroup.net> Cc: Robin King <RKing@cmcd.org>; Kevin Dunleavy <KDunleavy@cmcd.org>; Keira Lucas <klucas@cmcd.org>; Mark Prince <MPrince@cmcd.org> Subject: Re: Cell Tower in Collier County Sounds good. Keep in touch. Thanks, Patrick Sent from my iPhone On Sep 9, 2022, at 9:56 AM, Nick Constantine <nconstantine@tepgroup.net> wrote: Thanks. So as far as our “Control Plan” we don’t necessarily need to detail proposed treatments at this time just provide info from your website for the contractor when it is built for how to report mosquitoes and requesting a field technician if needed along with the info below. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Nicholas M. Constantine, P.E. Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. (www.tepgroup.net) 500 East 84th Ave, Unit C-10, Thornton, CO 80229 |Office: (303) 566-9918 | Fax: (303) 566- 9916 |Mobile: (518) 852-1175 Civil|Surveying|Environmental|PM&E|Structural|Inspections|Geotechnical and Material Testing|Construction|Renewable Energy|Fiber|Site Acquisition From: Patrick Linn <PLinn@cmcd.org> Sent: Friday, September 9, 2022 7:51 AM To: nconstantine@tepgroup.net Cc: Robin King <RKing@cmcd.org>; Kevin Dunleavy <KDunleavy@cmcd.org>; Keira Lucas <klucas@cmcd.org>; Mark Prince <MPrince@cmcd.org> Subject: Cell Tower in Collier County Page 949 of 4908 3 Hi Nick: No particular format is necessary for us. All we really need to have is (information regarding) precise location, height, whether or not it will be lit (and how), and a timeline for construction. We very much appreciate you reaching out regarding the project and look forward to updates as you have them. Please visit our website at www.cmcd.org for information on our operations and more. Also, Please don’t hesitate to contact me directly with any questions or concerns. Best for a successful project, Patrick Linn Executive Director Collier Mosquito Control District From: Nick Constantine <nconstantine@tepgroup.net> Date: Thursday, September 8, 2022 at 10:59 AM To: Info <info@cmcd.org> Subject: Proposed Cell Tower ‐ Mosquito Control Plan We are submitting a proposal for a cell tower in Collier County and were requested to submit a mosquite control plan as well. Do you have a typical format or what you want for a Mosquito Control Plan for a typical cell tower that is being installed? _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Nicholas M. Constantine, P.E. - Director - Rocky Mountain Region Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. (www.tepgroup.net) 500 East 84th Ave, Unit C-10, Thornton, CO 80229 |Office: (303) 566-9918 | Fax: (303) 566- 9916 |Mobile: (518) 852-1175 Civil|Surveying|Environmental|PM&E|Structural|Inspections|Geotechnical and Material Testing|Construction|Renewable Energy|Fiber|Site Acquisition Sent from my iPhone Page 950 of 4908 Page 951 of 4908 Page 952 of 4908 RF Justification Package Everglades and 31st Ave NE with proposed zoning approved Golden Gate Boat Prepared by Verizon Wireless RF Engineering William Compton August 15th, 2023 Page 953 of 4908 Capacity is the need for more wireless resources.Cell sites have a limited amount of resources to handle voice calls,data connections,and data volume.When these limits are reached,user experience quickly degrades.This could mean customers may no longer be able to make/receive calls nor be able to browse the internet.It could also mean that webpages will be very slow to download. Coverage is the need to expand wireless service into an area that either has no service or bad service. The request for service often comes from customers or emergency personnel. Expansion of service could mean improving the signal levels in a large apartment complex or new residential community. It could also mean providing new service along a newly built highway. Introduction: There are two main drivers that prompt the need for a new cell site.One is coverage and the other is capacity. Page 954 of 4908 Capacity is the amount of resources a cell site has to handle customer demand. We utilize sophisticated programs that use current usage trends to forecast future capacity needs. Since it takes an average of (1-3) years to complete a cell site project, we have to start the acquisition process several years in advance to ensure the new cell site is in place before the existing cell site hits capacity limits. Location, Location, Location. A capacity cell site needs to be as close as possible to the center of the user population and network demand as that ensures a more even traffic distribution around the cell. A typical cell site is configured in a circular pie shape, with each slice (aka. sector) holding 33% of the total cell site resources. Optimal performance is achieved when traffic is evenly distributed across the 3 sectors. A new site placed too close to an existing cell site generates unwanted interference to existing customers and does not offload far away traffic and is therefore an ineffective capacity offload solution. Page 955 of 4908 Need Case for: Everglades and 31st Ave NE The existing network in eastern Collier County near the intersection of Oil Well Road and Everglades Blvd has coverage and resulting capacity issues. The proposed site will be surrounded by single family residential buildout on large wooded lots which are very difficult to provide adequate service. This area generates significant numbers of customer complaints due to coverage and capacity issues. The proposed site will significantly enhance the coverage and capacity need in the area and will bring significant network performance improvements to the existing and future residents of this area. There are no existing structures in the area that could support the installation of the Verizon Wireless equipment needed . Note: The internal Verizon Wireless site name for this project is Desoto and Oil Well which describes the initial design area for the site. Subsequent zoning changes allowed a move to the much better solution discussed here. The following maps will use the VzW site name. Page 956 of 4908 LTE AWS (Capacity Band) Current Coverage Zoning Approved not in service site Zoning Proposed not in service site Page 957 of 4908 LTE AWS (Capacity Band) Proposed Coverage Zoning Approved not in service site Zoning Proposed not in service site Page 958 of 4908 LTE AWS (Capacity Band) Proposed Coverage Zoning Approved not in service site Zoning Proposed not in service site Page 959 of 4908 Neighbor Sites with VzW Installations and Distance G F E C B A I H D 5.6miles 6.7miles 9.0miles 8.6miles 7.5miles 5.6miles 3.6miles 3.3miles Z 6.8miles 3.9miles Page 960 of 4908 First Tier Neighbors Zoning Approved and Proposed Site Information Map Label Latitude Longitude FCC ASR FCC Structure Owner Structure Max Height (ft)Structure Type VzW Centerline (ft)VzW Site Name A 26.36748 -81.56982 1204878 SBA 280 Lattice 182 ACME Immokalee B 26.32213 -81.44313 1268378 SBA 100 Unipole 65 Ave Maria Utility C 26.3102 -81.40051 1217351 ATC 250 Lattice 150 Ave Maria D 26.17012 -81.50412 1213946 ATC 400 Guyed 235 Lucky Lake E 26.18312 -81.57482 1020484 Alpert Tower 1017 Guyed 220 Alpine Broadcasting F 26.22841 -81.63218 1208812 Golden Gate Fire Control 160 Lattice 143 Baker G 26.25444 -81.62508 1022178 CCATT LLC 281 Lattice 140 Crown Rock Road H 26.27644 -81.6011 1238039 ATC 200 Monopole 182 Forth Island Zoning Approved Site Z 26.22971 -81.57235 TBD Vertical Bridge 140 Monopine 135 Golden Gate Boat Proposed Site 26.28931 -81.54423 TBD 184 Lattice 176 Page 961 of 4908 Initial Search Ring (Work Around due to Estates Zoning Limitations) Coordinates: 26.294 -81.5138 Radius 1 mile Page 962 of 4908 Acceptable Placement Area (With new Estates Zoning in Place) Center Coordinates: 26.288009° -81.530461° radius 2mi north to south radius 1.1m east to west Page 963 of 4908 Additional Information Page 964 of 4908 At Verizon Wireless RF Justification maps are created based on the internal project justifications for the project. Typically there are not instances where neighboring sites that meet those 2 very different RF Justification criteria exist, but the uniqueness of Golden Gate Estates in eastern Collier County and the extreme delays in building solutions for the area has resulted in just such a case. The RF Justification criteria are either Coverage or Capacity. Coverage sites are justified based on the primary need for the site is RF Coverage, Capacity sites are justified based on the primary need for the site is to offload capacity issues from neighboring sites. The Golden Gate and Everglades site was internally identified and budgeted as a Coverage justified site and therefore the frequency band used for the RF propagation maps chosen is the 700Mhz (Coverage oriented) frequency band. The Everglades Ave and 31st site was internally identified and budgeted as a Capacity site and therefore, the frequency band chosen for the propagation maps default to our primary capacity layer which is the 2,100Mhz/AWS (Capacity oriented) frequency band. The different frequency bands propagate very differently due to the physics of RF wave theory and therefore the resulting RF “coverage” maps produced will vary greatly. Coverage Map Differences Between RF Justification Presentations Page 965 of 4908 Page 966 of 4908 Page 1 of 25 Laura DeJohn Collier County Growth Management Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 Re: Site Acquisition Methodology for US-FL-5283 Palmetto Ridge II Dear Ms. DeJohn, I lead the site acquisition process on site US-FL-5283 Palmetto Ridge II (“Palmetto Ridge II”) for Bridger Tower Corporation (“Bridger”). Palmetto Ridge II is a 180’ AGL lattice style communication tower proposed at 3147 31St Ave NE, in Collier County, Florida, (Parcel No. 40171120002 to solve a gap in service for Verizon in and around the area of Everglades Blvd, 31st Avenue, and Oil Well Road. Verizon will be the anchor tenant and their proposed coverage will serve an area with an estimated general population of 5,000 persons. Verizon is experiencing a gap in service that consists primarily of a lack of capacity, brought on by a lack of coverage of higher capacity radio bands licensed to Verizon. Verizon originally requested a 250’ AGL self- support style communication tower. I began site acquisition work for Palmetto Ridge II on 07/19/2020. During that time, I pursued 12 parcels to more advanced stages of negotiations and drove the entire search ring numerous times, looking for different locations while searching for a suitable property that met the requirements of the County’s Land Development Code (LDC), met Verizon’s RF objectives, and had a landlord willing to lease their land. The site acquisition search lasted until 11/09/2021, when Bridger secured a lease on the 3147 31St Ave NE, property. The site acquisition process ultimately took 16 months. The site acquisition process begins when I receive the anchor tenant’s structure requirements and search area. These parameters are informed by the carrier’s RF needs. After I review the anchor’s parameters, I then map the search area to identify any existing towers that may be within it. Then I perform a reconnaissance drive, which confirms whether there are unregistered towers or structures of adequate height that could be viable for colocation. If neither of those are present, I also begin identifying potential locations for a new tower during the reconnaissance drive. The process of identifying the appropriate landowner “contact” varies from search area to search area. It can be as short as a few days or, in extreme cases, it can last many months. During that time, I contact candidate properties via phone, email, and websites; physically visit locations; and send letters to property owners of record. Once contact is established, I am often “bounced” around within organizations until the appropriate decision maker is identified. In many cases, once I speak with a potential “contact,” they immediately decline the proposal. When an interested landowner wishes to pursue the proposal, communication can continue for months as information and lease negotiations are shared with boards, family members, and other stakeholders. Unfortunately, the majority of the time, the proposal will be declined. Below is a list of all parcels located within the search area that qualify under the Collier County Land Page 967 of 4908 Page 2 of 25 Development Code. Analyzed parcels located within the search ring are organized by major road. Aerials for each major street, as well as an overall aerial showing the search area, are below. Image of the Verizon and AT&T Search Areas. The Verizon Search area is outlined in Yellow while the AT&T Search area is outlined in blue. The portion of the AT&T Search Area that does not overlap with the Verizon Search Area is not included in this analysis as AT&T is not the Anchor Tenant. Therefore, the site cannot be located outside of the Verizon Search Area. NOTE: Some of the parcels below were evaluated utilizing Collier County GIS Zoning Maps Page 968 of 4908 Page 3 of 25 Everglades Blvd, North of Oil Well Rd Everglades Blvd Parcel Map This segment Everglades Blvd consists of 60 qualifying parcels within the search ring: 39770840008 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. Page 969 of 4908 Page 4 of 25 39770800006 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39770760007 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39770720005 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39770640004 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39843200009 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39843240001 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39843080009 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39770400008 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39770320007 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. Page 970 of 4908 Page 5 of 25 39770360009 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39770200004 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39843000005 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39843040007 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39842920005 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39842840004 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39842800002 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39842680002 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39770160102 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. Page 971 of 4908 Page 6 of 25 39770120003 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39770080004 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39770040002 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39951240003 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39951160109 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39951160002 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39842560009 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39842440006 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39902280009 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. Page 972 of 4908 Page 7 of 25 39902080005 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39951120000 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39951040009 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39950920007 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39950800004 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39950840006 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39902000001 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39901880002 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39901920001 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. Page 973 of 4908 Page 8 of 25 39901840000 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39901800008 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39901760009 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39950760005 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39950720003 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39950640002 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39950560001 • Explanation – This parcel would not be able to provide setbacks from Estates zoned lands that are equal to or larger than the selected parcel. 39902000001 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39901880002 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. Page 974 of 4908 Page 9 of 25 39901920001 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39901840000 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39901800008 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39901760009 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39901600004 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39901640006 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39901560005 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39901520003 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39901520100 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. Page 975 of 4908 Page 10 of 25 39901440002 • Explanation – This parcel would not be able to provide setbacks from Estates zoned lands that are equal to or larger than the selected parcel. 39950440008 • Explanation – I attempted to contact the property owner but did not receive a response. We would find ourselves in an identical zoning situation on this parcel as we currently find ourselves. 39950400006 • Explanation – This parcel is developed entirely as a water retention pond. 39901280000 Explanation – This parcel would not be able to provide setbacks from Estates zoned lands that are equal to or larger than the selected parcel. 39901200006 • Explanation – This parcel would not be able to provide setbacks from Estates zoned lands that are equal to or larger than the selected parcel. Therefore, no feasible alternate sites exist along this major road. Page 976 of 4908 Page 11 of 25 Everglades Blvd, Between Randall Blvd and Oil Well Rd Everglades Blvd Parcel Map This segment of Everglades Blvd consists of 38 qualifying parcels: 39950080002 • Explanation –This parcel does not provide setbacks from existing structures that would be equal to or greater than the parent parcel. 40171120002 • Explanation –This is the parcel that was selected. Page 977 of 4908 Page 12 of 25 39901000109 • Explanation –I attempted to contact the property owner but did not receive a response. 39901000002 • Explanation –I attempted to contact the property owner but did not receive a response. 40244480006 • Explanation –I attempted to contact the property owner but did not receive a response. 40244440004 • Explanation –I attempted to contact the property owner but did not receive a response. 40244320001 • Explanation –This parcel has inadequate space for the tower site. 40171080003 • Explanation – I attempted to contact the property owner but did not receive a response. 40171000009 • Explanation – I attempted to contact the property owner but did not receive a response. 40170920009 • Explanation – I attempted to contact the property owner but did not receive a response. 40170920106 • Explanation –I attempted to contact the property owner but did not receive a response. 40170840008 • Explanation – This parcel does not provide setbacks from existing structures that would be equal to or greater than the parent parcel. 40170880000 • Explanation – Parcel does not allow setbacks from existing structures No access 40244240000 • Explanation –I attempted to contact the property owner but did not receive a response. 40244200008 • Explanation –I attempted to contact the property owner but did not receive a response. Page 978 of 4908 Page 13 of 25 40243960006 • Explanation – This parcel does not provide setbacks from existing structures that would be equal to or greater than the parent parcel and lacks a usable access point. 40244000004 • Explanation –I attempted to contact the property owner but did not receive a response. 40170760007 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40170680006 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40170640004 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40170520001 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40243520006 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40243480007 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40243440005 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. Page 979 of 4908 Page 14 of 25 40243360004 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40243400003 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40170480002 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40170440000 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40170360009 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40170400008 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40170280008 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40170200004 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40243320002 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. Page 980 of 4908 Page 15 of 25 40243320002 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40243240001 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40243040007 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. Therefore, no feasible alternate sites exist along this major road. Page 981 of 4908 Page 16 of 25 Everglades Blvd, South of Randall Blvd Everglades Blvd Parcel Map This segment of Everglades Blvd consists of 32 qualifying parcels: 40170160005 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40170080004 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. Page 982 of 4908 Page 17 of 25 40351400005 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40243000005 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40304200003 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40304160004 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40351320004 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40351280005 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40351000007 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40304120002 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. Page 983 of 4908 Page 18 of 25 40304000009 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40303920009 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40303960001 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40303880107 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40350960009 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40350600000 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40303800006 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40303760007 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40303720102 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. Page 984 of 4908 Page 19 of 25 40303720005 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40303680006 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40303640004 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40350560001 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40350200109 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40303520001 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40303560003 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40303440000 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40303480002 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. Page 985 of 4908 Page 20 of 25 40303400008 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40350160003 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40350120001 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40303360106 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. Therefore, no feasible alternate sites exist along this major road. Page 986 of 4908 Page 21 of 25 Oil Well Road Oil Well Road Parcel Map Oil Well Road consists of 14 qualifying parcels, within the search ring: 39900880003 • Explanation – This parcel would not be able to provide setbacks from Estates zoned lands that are equal to or larger than the selected parcel. 39900840001 • Explanation – This parcel would not be able to provide setbacks from Estates zoned lands that are equal to or larger than the selected parcel. 39900960004 • Explanation –This is inadequate space on this parcel because it is fully occupied by the parent use. 40010600007 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. Page 987 of 4908 Page 22 of 25 40010680001 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 73650000102 • Explanation –This parcel is planned to be used for a future right of way expansion. 73650000267 • Explanation –This parcel is within a floodplain. 73650000241 • Explanation –I attempted to contact the property owner but did not receive a response. 73650000063 • Explanation –I attempted to contact the property owner but did not receive a response. 73650000225 • Explanation –I attempted to contact the property owner but did not receive a response. 73650000021 • Explanation –I attempted to contact the property owner but did not receive a response. 73650000283 • Explanation –I attempted to contact the property owner but did not receive a response. 73650000089 • Explanation –I attempted to contact the property owner but did not receive a response. 73650000047 • Explanation –This parcel is within a floodplain. Therefore, no feasible alternate sites exist along this major road. Page 988 of 4908 Page 23 of 25 Randall Blvd and Sabal Palm Middle School Randall Blvd Parcel Map Page 989 of 4908 Page 24 of 25 Sabal Palm Parcel Map Randall Blvd consists of 3 qualifying parcels and one potentially qualifying parcel within the search ring: 40243080009 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40243080009 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40242960007 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. Page 990 of 4908 Page 991 of 4908 Page 992 of 4908 Page 993 of 4908 Page 994 of 4908 Page 995 of 4908 Page 996 of 4908 Page 997 of 4908 Page 998 of 4908 Page 999 of 4908 Page 1000 of 4908 Page 1001 of 4908 Page 1002 of 4908 Page 1003 of 4908 Page 1004 of 4908 Page 1005 of 4908 Page 1006 of 4908 Page 1007 of 4908 Page 1008 of 4908 Page 1009 of 4908 Page 1010 of 4908 Page 1011 of 4908 Page 1012 of 4908 Page 1013 of 4908 Page 1014 of 4908 Page 1015 of 4908 Page 1016 of 4908 Page 1017 of 4908 Page 1018 of 4908 Page 1019 of 4908 Page 1020 of 4908 Page 1021 of 4908 Page 1022 of 4908 Page 1023 of 4908 $ 170,000$ 9,900$ 0$ 13,500$ 0 $ 57,534 $ 0 $ 57,534 $ 30,486 $ 27,048 $ 57,534 Collier County Proper ty AppraiserProperty Summar y ParcelNo 40171120002 SiteAddress*Disclaimer 314731STAVENE SiteCity NAPLES SiteZone*Note 34120 Name /Address MERAN, CARLOS J 202 GOLDEN GATE BLVD W City NAPLES State FL Zip 34120 Map No.Strap No.Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3D20 346900 1503D20 20 48 28 5.15 Legal GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 68 TR 15 MillageArea 138 Millage Rates *Calculations Sub./Condo 346900 - GOLDEN GATE ESTUNIT 68 School Other Total Use Code 0 - VACANT RESIDENTIAL 4.889 8.7793 13.6683 Latest Sales Histor y (Not all Sales are listed due toConfidentiality)Date Book-Page Amount03/31/21 5920-384005/25/12 4814-305006/04/12 4814-304702/09/91 1591-55906/01/77 690-1889 2021 Cer tified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value (+) Improved Value (=) Market Value (-) 10% Cap (=) Assessed Value (=) School Taxable Page 1024 of 4908 $ 27,048Value (=) Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 thisparcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Page 1025 of 4908 Page 1026 of 4908 Page 1027 of 4908 DESCRIPTION: PARENT TRACT (AS PROVIDED BY CLIENT) ALL OF TRACT 15, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT NO. 68, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 90, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. DESCRIPTION: 75'X75' BRIDGER CELL ASSETS, LLC LEASE AREA (AS REQUESTED BY CLIENT) A PARCEL OF LAND LYING WITHIN SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST LINE OF TRACT 15, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT NO. 68, PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 90, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AND THE NORTH ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT LINE OF 31ST AVENUE NE, BEING MARKED BY A FOUND 5/8" IRON ROD (NO IDENTIFICATION); THENCE S89°35'44"W, DEPARTING THE EAST LINE OF SAID TRACT 15, AND ALONG THE NORTH ROAD RIGHT- OF-WAY EASEMENT LINE OF SAID 31ST AVENUE NE, A DISTANCE OF 190.18 FEET; THENCE CONTINUE S89º35'44"W, ALONG THE NORTH ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT LINE OF SAID 31ST AVENUE NW, A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET; THENCE N00°24'16"W, DEPARTING THE NORTH ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT LINE OF SAID 31ST AVENUE NE, A DISTANCE OF 112.60 FEET; THENCE S89°35'44"W, A DISTANCE OF 27.50 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE N00°24'16"W, A DISTANCE OF 75.00 FEET; THENCE N89°35'44"E, A DISTANCE OF 75.00 FEET; THENCE S00°24'16"E, A DISTANCE OF 75.00 FEET; THENCE S89°35'44"W, A DISTANCE OF 75.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PROPOSED 75'X75' BRIDGER CELL ASSETS, LLC LEASE AREA CONTAINING 5,625 SQUARE FEET. DESCRIPTION: 20' WIDE NON-EXCLUSIVE BRIDGER CELL ASSETS, LLC ACCESS & UTILITY EASEMENT "A" (AS REQUESTED BY CLIENT) A STRIP OF LAND LYING WITHIN SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST LINE OF TRACT 15, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT NO. 68, PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 90, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AND THE NORTH ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT LINE OF 31ST AVENUE NE, BEING MARKED BY A FOUND 5/8" IRON ROD (NO IDENTIFICATION); THENCE S89°35'44"W, DEPARTING THE EAST LINE OF SAID TRACT 15, AND ALONG THE NORTH ROAD RIGHT- OF-WAY EASEMENT LINE OF SAID 31ST AVENUE NE, A DISTANCE OF 190.18 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE S89°35'44"W, ALONG THE NORTH ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT LINE OF SAID 31ST AVENUE NE, A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET; THENCE N00°24'16"W, DEPARTING THE NORTH ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT LINE OF SAID 31ST AVENUE NE, A DISTANCE OF 112.60 FEET; THENCE N89°35'44"E, A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET; THENCE S00°24'16"E, A DISTANCE OF 112.60 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID 20' WIDE NON-EXCLUSIVE BRIDGER CELL ASSETS, LLC ACCESS & UTILITY EASEMENT "A" CONTAINING 2,252 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. Page 1028 of 4908 DESCRIPTION: 20' WIDE NON-EXCLUSIVE BRIDGER CELL ASSETS, LLC ACCESS & UTILITY EASEMENT "B" (AS REQUESTED BY CLIENT) A STRIP OF LAND LYING WITHIN SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST LINE OF TRACT 15, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT NO. 68, PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 90, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AND THE NORTH ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT LINE OF 31ST AVENUE NE, BEING MARKED BY A FOUND 5/8" IRON ROD (NO IDENTIFICATION); THENCE S89°35'44"W, DEPARTING THE EAST LINE OF SAID TRACT 15, AND ALONG THE NORTH ROAD RIGHT- OF-WAY EASEMENT LINE OF SAID 31ST AVENUE NE, A DISTANCE OF 190.18 FEET; THENCE CONTINUE S89º35'44"W, ALONG THE NORTH ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT LINE OF SAID 31ST AVENUE NW, A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET; THENCE N00°24'16"W, DEPARTING THE NORTH ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT LINE OF SAID 31ST AVENUE NE, A DISTANCE OF 112.60 FEET; THENCE S89°35'44"W, A DISTANCE OF 27.50 FEET; THENCE N00°24'16"W, A DISTANCE OF 75.00 FEET; THENCE N89º35'44"E, A DISTANCE OF 27.50 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE N00°24'40"W, A DISTANCE OF 92.60 FEET; THENCE S89°35'20"W, A DISTANCE OF 350.70 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT LINE OF EVERGLADES BOULEVARD N, PER OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 4312, PAGE 3966, INSTRUMENT NUMBER 4107945, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE N00°26'54"W, ALONG THE EAST ROAD RIGHT-OF- WAY EASEMENT LINE OF SAID EVERGLADES BOULEVARD N, A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 15, BEING MARKED BY A FOUND 5/8" IRON ROD LB 8357; THENCE N89°35'20"E, DEPARTING THE EAST ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT LINE OF SAID EVERGLADES BOULEVARD N, AND ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 15, A DISTANCE OF 370.72 FEET; THENCE S00°24'40"E, DEPARTING THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 15, A DISTANCE OF 112.60 FEET; THENCE S89°35'44"W, A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID 20' WIDE NON-EXCLUSIVE BRIDGER CELL ASSETS, LLC ACCESS & UTILITY EASEMENT "B" CONTAINING 9,266 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. Page 1029 of 4908 Page 1030 of 4908 Page 1031 of 4908 Page 1032 of 4908 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Created 9/28/2017 Page 1 of 3 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: Name and Address % of Ownership b. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address % of Ownership c. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest: Name and Address % of Ownership Page 1033 of 4908 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Created 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 3 d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners: Name and Address % of Ownership e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners: Name and Address % of Ownership Date of Contract: ___________ f. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust: Name and Address g. Date subject property acquired _______________ Leased: Term of lease ____________ years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Page 1034 of 4908 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Created 9/28/2017 Page 3 of 3 Date of option: _________________________ Date option terminates: __________________, or Anticipated closing date: ________________ AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form. Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest-holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition’s final public hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 ____________________________________________ ____________ Agent/Owner Signature Date ____________________________________________ Agent/Owner Name (please print) Page 1035 of 4908 Page 1036 of 4908 Page 1037 of 4908 Page 1038 of 4908 Page 1039 of 4908 US‐FL‐5283_PalmettoRidge2_ Traffic Impact Statement Bridger Tower Corp, Telecommunication Facility 180’ Self‐Support Tower 1 September 9, 2022 Attn: Planning and Zoning Collier County 2800 Horseshoe Drive North Naples, FL 34104 RE: Traffic Impact Statement To Whom It May Concern, This letter is in regards to the imposed traffic at the proposed Bridger Tower Corp telecommunications facility located at the corner of Everglades Blvd North and 31st Ave NE, on parcel No. 40171120002, as identified by the Collier County, FL. The proposed project will involve the use of a proposed access road off of 31st Ave NE. The proposed gravel access road will be installed with a 15” culvert along the roadside ditch (matching the size of nearby residential driveway) and be approximately 130’ long up to the site. The access drive will only be utilized by Site Technicians 10‐12 times a year (plus any power outages or unforeseen maintenance issues). Site Techs have all‐terrain vehicles, with only two axles and are trained in accessing sites in poor conditions. A map of the proposed location can be found on the site plan provided by TEP (project #: 258947.485251). There will be no interruption to traffic along 31st Ave NE or Everglades Blvd North during construction of the access drive. Construction of the site shall be complete within 4‐5 weeks of start date, with a peak hour volume of no more than 2 per hour. 31st Ave NE is a local improved surface road with no marked speed limit and has no recorded traffic data. Everglades Blvd is a divided asphalt road with 6 lanes north of 31st Ave NE and 4 lanes south of 31st Ave NE. with a 45 mph speed limit and AADT average of 6300 (Annual Average Daily Traffic. Values determined from the Florida DOT traffic count maps. The increased traffic of 10‐12 vehicles per year will not affect the current road volumes. Regards, Nicholas M. Constantine, P.E Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. 5906 Breckenridge Parkway, Suite A Tampa, FL 33610 Office: (813) 4252-1570 Cell: (518) 852-1175 Email: nconstantine@tepgroup.net Page 1040 of 4908 US‐FL‐5283_PalmettoRidge2_ Traffic Impact Statement Bridger Tower Corp, Telecommunication Facility 180’ Self‐Support Tower 2 FDOT Traffic Count Page 1041 of 4908 US‐FL‐5283_PalmettoRidge2_ Traffic Impact Statement Bridger Tower Corp, Telecommunication Facility 180’ Self‐Support Tower 3 Existing 31st Ave NE Views View Looking East View Looking West at Access Road Page 1042 of 4908 US‐FL‐5283_PalmettoRidge2_ Traffic Impact Statement Bridger Tower Corp, Telecommunication Facility 180’ Self‐Support Tower 4 Existing Access Road Culvert Existing Residence Drive Existing Culvert Page 1043 of 4908 US‐FL‐5283_PalmettoRidge2_ Traffic Impact Statement Bridger Tower Corp, Telecommunication Facility 180’ Self‐Support Tower 5 Existing Everglades Blvd View Looking South from Oil Well Road Intersection View Looking East from 31st Ave NE and Everglades Blvd Intersection Page 1044 of 4908 US‐FL‐5283_PalmettoRidge2_ Traffic Impact Statement Bridger Tower Corp, Telecommunication Facility 180’ Self‐Support Tower 6 Site Plan Page 1045 of 4908 FCC NEPA COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST PROPOSED 180-FT AGL (184-FT AGL OVERALL) SELF- SUPPORT COMMUNICATIONS TOWER SITE NAME:PALMETTO RIDGE 2 (US-FL-5283) 31ST AVENUE NE NAPLES,FL 34120 (COLLIER COUNTY) LATITUDE:N 26°17’22.00²± LONGITUDE:W 81°32’38.24²± DATE OF SITE INSPECTION:JUNE 21, 2022 DATE NEPA ISSUED:SEPTEMBER 12,2022 Page 1046 of 4908 Project Site Specific NEPA Compliance Checklist Bridger Tower Corporation Palmetto Ridge 2 (US-FL-5283) Page 1047 of 4908 September 12,2022 326 Tryon Road,Raleigh, NC 27603-3530 O) 919.661.6351 F) 919.661.6350 rmalek@tepgroup.net Bridger Tower Corporation 1951 East 400th Road Lecompton, KS 66050 Re:FCC NEPA Checklist Palmetto Ridge 2 (US-FL-5283) 31st Avenue NE Naples, Florida (Collier County) To Whom it May Concern: Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. (TEP)completed an FCC National Environmental Policy Act Compliance Checklist (NEPA) for the proposed development of a 180-ft (184-ft overall)AGL Self-Support Communications Tower for the site designated as Palmetto Ridge 2 (US-FL-5283)and is pleased to submit the findings to Bridger Tower Corporation.The proposed self-support tower site is located on a parcel of real estate in Collier County,FL identified as Parcel ID:40171120002 by the Collier County Tax Assessors Office.At the time of inspection, the parent property was primarily occupied by agricultural land uses. The NEPA Checklist research conducted by TEP indicates that the site is not: located in an officially designated wilderness area; located in an officially designated wildlife preserve;located in a floodplain and proposed to be constructed less than 1-ft above the base flood elevation (BFE);located in a residential zoned area and is anticipated to be unlit;and will not: affect threatened or endangered species or their designated critical habitats; affect districts, sites, buildings, structures or objects listed or eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places;affect Indian religious sites or involve significant changes to surface features. TEP conducted the Section 106 of the NHPA portion of the NEPA checklist and the Native American consultation. TEP filed the proposed Palmetto Ridge 2 (US-FL-5283)tower site with the FCC Tower Construction Notification System (TCNS) on 06/03/2022 and was assigned TCNS Identification Number 250040.TEP has received correspondence from all the applicable tribes with known ancestral and/or aboriginal rights to Collier County,FL as per FCC TCNS. The results of the NEPA Checklist conducted by TEP conclude that no further investigation (i.e. NEPA Environmental Assessment) is warranted or recommended for the Palmetto Ridge 2 (US-FL-5283)site. This NEPA Checklist is limited to the location of the proposed 180-ft (184-ft overall)AGL self-support communications tower as depicted on the “Extended Site Plan,Z-4”zoning drawings dated 03/29/2022,which were completed by TEP for Bridger Tower Corporation. Any future or additional access and/or utility easements not depicted on the aforementioned site plan were not assessed as part of this NEPA Checklist and are not warranted with this document. Sincerely Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. Ryan A. Malek Environmental Division Manager Page 1048 of 4908 FCC NEPA COMPLIANCE AUDIT CHECKLIST BRIDGER TOWER CORPORATION PALMETTO RIDGE 2 (US-FL-5283)SITE PROPOSED 180-FT AGL (184-FT AGL OVERALL)SELF-SUPPORT TOWER 31ST AVENUE NE NAPLES,FL 61420 COLLIER COUNTY 1.Is the proposed facility located in an officially designated wilderness area?No 2.Is the proposed facility located in an officially designated wildlife preserve?No 3.Will the proposed facility likely adversely affect threatened or endangered species or designated critical habitats; or likely jeopardize the continued existence of any proposed endangered or threatened species; or likely result in the destruction or adverse modification of proposed critical habitats (as determined by the Endangered Species Act or 1973)?No 4.Will the proposed facility affect districts,sites, buildings, structures or objects significant in American history, architecture, archeology, engineering or culture, that are listed (or eligible for listing) in the National Register of Historic Places?No 5.Will the proposed facility affect Indian religious sites?No 6.Is the proposed facility located in a floodplain and proposed to be constructed less than 1-ft above the base flood elevation (BFE)?No 7.Will construction of the proposed facility involve significant change in surface features (e.g., wetland fill, deforestation or water diversion)?No 8.Is the proposed facility located in a residential neighborhood and is required to be equipped with high intensity white lights (as defined by local zoning law)?No If any of the above questions result in an answer of “yes”, then construction may not start on any of these sites prior to receipt of a finding of no significant impact by FCC. RF Exposure Screening Under NEPA 9A.Will the proposed NON-ROOFTOP facility equal or exceed total power (of all channels) of 2000 watts ERP (3280 Watts EIRP) and have antennas located less than 10 meters above ground level?No 9B.Will the proposed ROOFTOP facility equal or exceed total power (of all channels)of 2000 watts ERP (3280 Watts EIRP)?N/A IF “yes” is the answer to either of the two RF exposure questions, an evaluation must be performed to determine if Bridger Tower Corporation exceeds the FCC’s exposure limits. TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS, INC.Date:September 12, 2022 Print Name: Ryan A. Malek Signature: Page 1049 of 4908 The following provides additional information concerning each item on the checklist. 1.Designated Wilderness Areas –Based on a review of the National Wilderness Institute Map of Wilderness Areas, dated June 2, 2022, the US National Wilderness Preservation System Map webmapper, the National Park Service map of National Natural Landmarks, the Wild & Scenic Rivers webmapper, and the National Scenic and Historic Trails webmapper,the proposed tower site is not located within an officially designated wilderness area. 2.Designated Wildlife Preserves –Based on a review of the US Fish and Wildlife Service: National Wildlife Refuge System Map, dated January 27,2020, the proposed tower site is not located within an officially designated wildlife preserve. 3A.Listed Threatened or Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitats –Based on a review of protected species obtained from the USFWS –Collier County –Official Species List (Project Code: 2022-0067150) dated July 25, 2022,information obtained from the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, and an on-site investigation,it is the opinion of TEP that the proposed communications tower will have “no effect” on federally or state listed threatened or endangered species or their designated critical habitats, as no suitable or critical habitats were observed in the vicinity of the proposed project area.TEP solicited comments on the proposed undertaking from the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service –Florida Ecological Services Field Office (USFWS)and the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC)on 07/29/2022.No response has been received to date from the USFWS.A response from USFWS for a “no effect”determination is not required per Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA).Laura DiGruttolo, Biological Administrator with FWC responded to TEP’s invitation to comment letter on 08/08/2022; stating that the FWC has “no comments, recommendations, or objections related to state-listed species and their habitat or other fish and wildlife resources to offer on this project.” 3B.Proposed Threatened or Endangered Species or Proposed Critical Habitats –Based on a review of protected species obtained from the USFWS –Collier County –Official Species List (Project Code: 2022-0067150) dated July 25, 2022,it is the opinion of TEP that the proposed communications tower will have “no effect” on federally listed proposed threatened or endangered species or their proposed designated critical habitats, as none were listed on the Official Species List. 4.Historical Places –Based on the results of our coordination with the Florida Department of State’s Division of Historic Resources (FL SHPO),the proposed tower will have “no effect”on properties listed on or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, as none were identified in the APE.The FL SHPO provided concurrence to TEP’s determination on August 4, 2022.TEP also provided written correspondence to the Collier County Planning Department, the City of Naples Planning Department, the Naples Historical Society, and the Florida Historical Society on July 11, 2022.The Collier County Planning Department responded on July 12, 2022; stating that there are no historic properties identified within the APE for the proposed tower site.No other responses have been received to date. 5.Indian Religious Sites –Based upon a review of available information obtained from the Bureau of Indian Affairs-Indian Reservations in the Continental United States, dated 5/96, and the responses to the FCC- Tower Construction Notification ID #250040,filed 06/03/2022,no known Indian religious sites will be affected by the proposed tower site. 6.Floodplains –According to the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) Panel #12021C0245H dated 05/16/2012,the proposed project area is mapped in Zone AH –areas with 1% annual chance of shallow flooding, usually in the form of a pond, with an average depth ranging from 1 to 3 feet. These areas have a 26% chance of flooding over the life of a 30-year mortgage. The base flood elevation (BFE) derived for this area is determined to be approximately 16-ft AMSL.It is recommended that the pertinent equipment associated with the proposed communications tower facility be elevated at least 1-ft above the determined BFE of approximately 16-ft AGL.Also, for the purposes of the rule, equipment is considered broadly to includes, for example, carrier cabinets, electrical service entrances, back-up power sources, Page 1050 of 4908 back-up fuel, and FAA lighting systems. Any other component likely to be damaged, destroyed, or otherwise fail in the event of a flood should also be elevated.At the time of issuance of this NEPA Checklist, there is no pertinent equipment proposed for installation associated with the proposed tower facility; therefore, the proposed action is in compliance. Any future pertinent equipment must be elevated at least 1-ft above the determined BFE of approximately 16-ft AGL.Additionally,TEP recommends contacting the local Floodplain Administrator prior to construction to inquire if the proposed action would require a flood study and/or Development Permit. 7.Surface Features –According to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service -National Wetlands Inventory map, the USGS 7.5-Minute Corkscrew SE, FL topographic quadrangle, and an on-site inspection performed by TEP, construction of the proposed site will not result in a significant change or modification to surface features such as fill in jurisdictional wetlands, deforestation, or water diversion. At the time of inspection on July 14, 2022, the parent parcel and neighboring properties were inundated with surface water from a recent significant rain event. However, no dominant hydrophytic vegetation was noted in the proposed project area.Per the historical aerial photographs, the parent property appears to have incurred significant man- made hydrological alterations between 1952 and 1962 with the installation of numerous east-to-west spanning lateral ditches spaced approximately 100-ft apart that potentially converted any previous wetland areas to upland. Therefore, it is the opinion of TEP that construction of the proposed communications tower will not result in a significant change or modification to surface features such as fill in jurisdictional wetlands, deforestation, or water diversion. 8.Zoning/High Intensity White Lights –The proposed tower is anticipated to be unlit. 9A.Radio Frequency Emissions –Based on the specified elevation of the proposed antennas (>10 meters) and because the site will be located within a restricted area,no further study concerning radio frequency emissions is required. Page 1051 of 4908 LOCATION MAPNDRIVING DIRECTIONSCONTACT INFORMATIONINDEX OF SHEETSSHEETDESCRIPTIONT-121-A COORDINATES 31ST AVE NE,NAPLES, FL 34120(COLLIER COUNTY)SITE NAME:US-FL-5283PALMETTO RIDGE 2PL20210000117258947.485251PROJECT INFORMATIONSITE NAME:PROJECT DESCRIPTION:TOWER TYPE:SITE ADDRESS:(E911 ADDRESS TBD)184' SELF-SUPPORT TOWERUS-FL-5283 PALMETTORIDGE 2AREA OF CONSTRUCTION:ZONING:PARCEL #:10,000 ± SQ. FT.TOWER OWNER:BRIDGER TOWER CORPORATION1951 EAST 400TH ROADLECOMPTON, KS 66050DEREK DYE, PRESIDENT(785) 764-6682SITE APPLICANT:PROPERTY OWNER:CIVIL ENGINEER:ELECTRICAL ENGINEER:NAME:ADDRESS:CITY, STATE, ZIP:CONTACT:PHONE:NAME:ADDRESS:CITY, STATE, ZIP:CONTACT:PHONE:NAME:ADDRESS:CITY, STATE, ZIP:CONTACT:PHONE:NAME:ADDRESS:CITY, STATE, ZIP:CONTACT:PHONE:W 81° 32' 39.23" (NAD '83)N 26° 17' 21.52" (NAD '83)LATITUDELONGITUDEGROUND ELEVATION = 6,382.68' (NAVD '88)40171120002PROPOSED TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITYTOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS500 E. 84TH AVE, SUITE C10THORNTON, CO 80229OFFICE: (303) 566-9914www.tepgroup.netBRIDGER TOWER CORPORATION1951 EAST 400TH ROADLECOMPTON, KS 66050DEREK DYE(785) 764-6682CODE COMPLIANCEALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE PERFORMED AND INSTALLED INACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWING CODESAS ADOPTED BY THE LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES. NOTHING IN THESEPLANS IS TO BE CONSTRUED TO PERMIT WORK NOT CONFORMING TO THELATEST EDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWING:1.INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE(2018 EDITION)2.INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL3.ANSI/TIA/EIA-222-H4.NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE(2017 EDITION)5.CITY/COUNTY ORDINANCES6.IBC 2020 WINDZONE CODECALL FOR UNDERGROUNDUTILITIES PRIOR TO DIGGING(800) 424-5555EMERGENCY:CALL 911UTILITIES:POWER COMPANY:ADDRESS:CONTACT:PHONE:TELEPHONE COMPANY:CONTACT:PHONE:TBDFLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO751 39TH AVE NE, NAPLES, FL34120CUSTOMER SERVICE(239) 262-1322001-14-21ZONINGJFMNMCREVPROJECT DESCRIPTION & NOTESCONSTRUCTION OF A TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITY, CONSISTING OF ANTENNAS& ASSOCIATED APPURTENANCES ON A PROPOSED SELF-SUPPORT TOWER,FENCED COMPOUND & SERVICE EQUIPMENT FOR FUTURE CARRIERS. NO WATEROR SEWER IS REQUIRED.1.FACILITY DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE W/ COLLIER COUNTY REGULATIONS.2. THIS IS AN UNMANNED FACILITY WHICH WILL NOT REQUIRE ANY WATER ORSEWER FACILITIES.3. TRAFFIC WILL CONSIST ONLY OF MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL, VISITING THE SITEAPPROXIMATELY TWICE A MONTH.DRIVING SOUTH ON I-75 TAKE EXIT 111 TO IMMOKALEE RD. STAY IMMOKALEE RD FOR13.2 MILES. TURN RIGHT ONTO RANDALL BLVD AND STAY ON FOR 3.4 MILES. TURNLEFT ONTO EVERGLADES BLVD. THEN TURN RIGHT ONTO 31ST AVE NE. THEN THESITE WILL BE ON THE LEFT HAND SIDE OF THE ROAD.E - ESTATES ZONING JURISDICTION:COLLIER COUNTYLEGAL DESCRIPTION:GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 68TR 15 OR 1591 PG 55931ST AVE. NENAPLES, FL 34120(COLLIER COUNTY)REALTOR FOR TALBOT FOREST VIEW PROPERTIES, LLC8955 FONTANA DEL SOL WAYNAPLES, FL 34109BILL DUFFY(239) 641-7634SITESURVEYORNAME:ADDRESS:CITY, STATE, ZIP:CONTACT:PHONE:TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS, INC.326 TRYON RD.RALEIGH, NC 27603GRAYSON PHILLIPS(919) 661-6351BRIDGER TOWER CORPORATIONT1TITLE SHEETZ1WELL FIELD LOCATION222Z2PROPOSED TOWER LOCATIONSIGNAGEZ82LANDSCAPING PLANZ92DO NOT USE FORC O N S T R U C T I O NPRELIMINARYTOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS, INC.326 TRYON RD.RALEIGH, NC 27603GRAHAM M. ANDRES, PE(919) 661-6351TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS, INC.326 TRYON RD.RALEIGH, NC 27603GRAHAM M. ANDRES, P.E.(919) 661-6351112-19-21ZONING203-29-22ZONINGNAME:ADDRESS:CITY, STATE, ZIP:CONTACT:PHONE:LAW OFFICE:AGENT OF RECORDAERIAL2Z3EXTENDED SITE PLAN2Z4COMPOUND DETAIL2Z5TOWER ELEVATION2Z6FENCE DETAILS2Z7Page 1052 of 4908 001-14-21ZONINGUS-FL-5283 PALMETTO RIDGE 2258947.4852512TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS500 E. 84TH AVE, SUITE C10THORNTON, CO 80229OFFICE: (303) 566-9914www.tepgroup.netBRIDGER TOWER CORPORATION1951 EAST 400TH ROADLECOMPTON, KS 66050OFFICE: (785) 764-6682DO NOT USE FORCONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY112-19-21ZONING203-29-22ZONINGZ-1PROPOSED TOWERLOCATIONJFMNMCPROPOSED TOWER LOCATIONPage 1053 of 4908 001-14-21ZONINGUS-FL-5283 PALMETTO RIDGE 2258947.4852512TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS500 E. 84TH AVE, SUITE C10THORNTON, CO 80229OFFICE: (303) 566-9914www.tepgroup.netBRIDGER TOWER CORPORATION1951 EAST 400TH ROADLECOMPTON, KS 66050OFFICE: (785) 764-6682DO NOT USE FORCONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY112-19-21ZONING203-29-22ZONINGZ-2WELL FIELD OVERLAYJFMNMCWELL FIELD OVERLAYPage 1054 of 4908 001-14-21ZONINGUS-FL-5283 PALMETTO RIDGE 2258947.4852512TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS500 E. 84TH AVE, SUITE C10THORNTON, CO 80229OFFICE: (303) 566-9914www.tepgroup.netBRIDGER TOWER CORPORATION1951 EAST 400TH ROADLECOMPTON, KS 66050OFFICE: (785) 764-6682DO NOT USE FORCONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY112-19-21ZONING203-29-22ZONINGZ-3AERIALJFMNMCAERIALPage 1055 of 4908 31ST AVE. NE001-14-21ZONINGUS-FL-5283 PALMETTO RIDGE 2258947.4852512TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS500 E. 84TH AVE, SUITE C10THORNTON, CO 80229OFFICE: (303) 566-9914www.tepgroup.netBRIDGER TOWER CORPORATION1951 EAST 400TH ROADLECOMPTON, KS 66050OFFICE: (785) 764-6682DO NOT USE FORCONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY112-19-21ZONING203-29-22ZONINGZ-4EXTENDEDSITE PLANJFMNMCLEGENDNOTES:TOWER SETBACKSSITE PLANEVERGLADES BLVD. N Page 1056 of 4908 001-14-21ZONINGUS-FL-5283 PALMETTO RIDGE 2258947.4852512TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS500 E. 84TH AVE, SUITE C10THORNTON, CO 80229OFFICE: (303) 566-9914www.tepgroup.netBRIDGER TOWER CORPORATION1951 EAST 400TH ROADLECOMPTON, KS 66050OFFICE: (785) 764-6682DO NOT USE FORCONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY112-19-21ZONING203-29-22ZONINGJFMNMCZ-5COMPOUND DETAILCOMPOUNDDETAILPage 1057 of 4908 TOWER NOTES:001-14-21ZONINGUS-FL-5283 PALMETTO RIDGE 2258947.4852512TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS500 E. 84TH AVE, SUITE C10THORNTON, CO 80229OFFICE: (303) 566-9914www.tepgroup.netBRIDGER TOWER CORPORATION1951 EAST 400TH ROADLECOMPTON, KS 66050OFFICE: (785) 764-6682DO NOT USE FORCONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY112-19-21ZONING203-29-22ZONINGTOWER ELEVATIONZ-6TOWER ELEVATIONJFMNMCPage 1058 of 4908 ATTACHMENT 1 OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED WILDERNESS AREAS Page 1059 of 4908 Page 1060 of 4908 National Wilderness Preservation System‐ Florida https://databasin.org/maps/b00f45a4f0b345589e3870df4b1520a3/active Page 1061 of 4908 National Natural Landmarks‐ Florida https://www.nps.gov/subjects/nnlandmarks/state.htm?State=FL Page 1062 of 4908 Page 1063 of 4908 Page 1064 of 4908 Page 1065 of 4908 Page 1066 of 4908 Page 1067 of 4908 Wild & Scenic Rivers‐ Florida https://www.rivers.gov/river‐app/index.html?state=FL Page 1068 of 4908 Page 1069 of 4908 ATTACHMENT 2 OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED WILDLIFE PRESERVES Page 1070 of 4908 Region 1 Region 6 Region 3 Region 2 Region 5 Region 4 Region 8 Pend Oreill e C o l u m bia R Columbia R Hungry Horse Reservoir Milk Flathead Lake Madison R YellowstoneLake JacksonLake Y e l l o w s to n e Fort PeckLake LakeOahe N iob ra ra River LakeSakakawea Lake Francis Case P latte North R iv e r South Platte Green R Colorado River SeminoeReservoir PathfinderReservoir Arkansas River Tuttle CreekLakeWillamette R Snake GreatSalt Lake UtahLake LakePowell L i ttl e Col o rad o River Gila Peco s River AmistadReservoir Grand e Pyramid Lake Lake Tahoe SaltonSea Colorado LakeMead San Juan River Rio Grande C an a d i a n R iv e r Red Arkans as R i ve r B r a z o s River LakeTexoma Lake of the Woods Rainy R UpperRed LakeLowerRed Lake LeechLake Mi s sissippi Minnesota River R Men o mi nee St John River Moosehead Lake LakeChamplain R R Susquehanna R Illinois River Wabash River River N e w R James R Potomac R Roanoke R River Mi s s our i R i v e r Lake of theOzarks Table Rock Lake Bull ShoalsLake NorforkLake EufaulaLake W hite River R Red S a bin e R Sam RayburnReservoir Mississippi River Lake OkeechobeeSt J o h ns R Chattahoochee R MartinLake Alabama R Tombigbee R Yazoo R KentuckyLake LakeBarkley R Dale Hollow Lake HartwellLake Lake Sidney Lanier S avannah R iv e r American Fa l l s Res River Missouri River Rive r RiverRiverR LakeMcConaughy Lake LakeKoocanusa D es Moi nes St Croix Ohio Allegheny R Walter F George Lake Leaf R Snake R R River Marias Harry S TrumanRes LakeWinnebago Cumberland Connecticut Hudson C ape Fear R Tennessee RiverMilfordLake Flaming GorgeReservoir GooseLake Elephant ButteReservoir ShastaLake LakeLivingston J Strom Thurmond Lake MonoLake Robert S KerrRes Lewis SmithLake John H KerrRes WeissLake Lake O' TheCherokees NavajoReservoir HoneyLake LakeWinnibigoshish StocktonLake Carlyle Lake Owyhee Res Sun River RiverR i v e r Ri v e r Pla t t e Ri v e r RedRiver Rive r Muskegon RiverPortlan d Lakewood Albuquerque Hadley Atlanta HEADQUARTERS Washington, D . C . Bloomington Sacra m e n t o MAINE VERMON T NEW HAMPSHI R E NEW YORK MASSACH U S E T T S CONNECT I C U T RI PENNSYLVA N I A NEW JERSEY DEL MARYLAND VIRGINIA WEST VIRGINIA OHIOINDIANA ILLINOIS WISCONSIN KENTUCKY TENNESSEE NORTH CAR O L I N A SOUTH CARO L I N A GEORGIA ALABAMA FLORIDA MISSISSIPPI LOUISIANA TEXAS ARKANSAS MISSOURI IOWA MINNESOTANORTH DAKOTA SOUTH DAKOTA NEBRASKA KANSAS OKLAHOMA NEW MEXICO COLORADO WYOMING MONTANA IDAHO UTAH ARIZONA NEVAD A CALIF O R N I A OREG O N WASHI N G T O N DC M I C H I GAn TeshekpukLake Kobu k R Noatak R Colville R Yukon RiverYu k o n RR Tanana R Cop p e r RSusitnaR IliamnaLake BecharofLake R LakeClark K o y u k u k R Kuskokwim P orcupine Region 7 1 1 4 4 FWS Regions Regional OfficeanIo 70 70 145 o B E A U F O R T S E A AR C T I C O C E Barrow N Midway Atoll NWR C H 30 o U K C H Papahānaumokuākea MNM e mtiir Prudhoe Bay a M Alaska I Hawaiian Islands NWR S E A RUSSIA Marianas Trench MNM (Island Unit) TROPIC OF CANCER t )i U n o 65 cAlaska Marit i m e cArctic l (V o Honolulu HAWAII M NM55 20 o o Mariana Arc of Fire NWR / Marianas TrenchSee inset map of Hawaii below ARCTIC CIRCLE KoGuam NWR tNORTHERN MARIANA zeb Alaska Maritime ISLANDS u et (UNITED STATES) iSao Alaska Maritime Yukon Flats rSelawik utn d B ering SJohnston Atoll NWR and NK anuti Pacific Remote Islands MNM AMariana Trench NWR / Marianas Trench MNM (Trench Unit) ECO 10 No MARSHALL ISLAND S CIFKoyukuk IPACFairbanks C A N A D A Nome Kingman Reef NWR and FEDERATED STATES OF MICRONESIA Pacific Remote Islands MNM Palmyra Atoll NWR and Al ask Pacific Remote Islands MNM Innoko a ALASKA N o rto n S o u n d MSt. Lawre n c e aritimIsland e KIRITIMATI o (KIRIBATI) 60 Innoko Tetlin EQUATOR 0 o Baker Island NWR and a Pacific Remote Islands MNM e AlaskMaritim Al aska Mari65 o Jarvis Island NWR and Pacific Remote Islands MNM St. Matth e w I s l a n d Anchorage Yukon Delta timP A P U A N E W G U I N E A Valdez e Nelson Island Nunivak Island 50 Anchorage o TUVALU Bethel tCook InleSOLOMON ISLANDS Delt Yukon a TOKELAU10 So Alaska Marit i m e (NEW ZEALAND) Kenai Al aska Mari timCOOK ISLANDS (NEW ZEALAND) Juneau A e U e timS Alaska Maritime Togiak MariT R A L I A AMERICANSAMOA Rose Atoll NWR and Rose Atoll MNM SAMOA Alaska FUTUNA VA N U A T U (FRANCE) G U L F O F A A S K A Chichagof Is l a n d m e Alaska Maritime tiira 60 o Sitka M aAlaska Maritime kBecharof Alaska Mari t i m e sAl aska Mari timalAAttu I B ayAfognak Island BER I N G S E A Baranof Isl a n d Pribilof I s l a n d s o 55 B ristol Alaska Peninsula Ketchikan Alaska Mari t i m e e PACIFIC OCEAN Prince of Wales Islan d Kodiak Island Alaska Peninsula Alaska Mari t i m e A emtiirL E U T I A N I S L A N D S a MaskaMaritime Kisk a I s l a n d Alk IzembeAlaska Unimak Island PACIFIC O C E A N Shumagin laska M a riti m e Amch i t k a Islands M aritim e Island 45 Ao A la ska Alaska Maritime Unalaska Unalaska Isla n d Adak Isl a n d Umnak Atka Isl a n d Island 3255 mi5238 km 15 5 7 m i 25 0 6 k m 50 o 50 o 3032 mi4880 km 4840 mi 7789 km Flatter y R o c k s 3812 mi6135 km Quillay u t e N e e d l e s NSan Juan I s lDungen e s s Aands C A N EProtect i o n I s l a n d A D C5 OCopalis Kootenai C2599 mi4183 kmIP A C IFSeattle Grays H a r b o r Little Pen d Oreille Olympi a Aroostook Creedman Cou l e eWillapa Lost Trail Julia Bu t l e r H a n s e n R Lake Thibadea u Billy Fra n k J r . N i s q u a l Spokane 90 Black Coulee Lewis an d C l a r k Rabb Lake for the C o l u m b i a n School Section Lake efuge ly Willow Lake Swan River Turnbull Hewitt Lake Oregon I s l a n d s White-T a i l e d D e e r Crosby WMD Northwest UpperDes Lacs Medicine Lake Rock Lake J. ClarkLake Zahl Mon WMD tana Pablo Columbia Bowdoin WMD Lostwood WMD 45 Swan Valley C A Souris SalyerToppenis h Brumba15 Bowdoin o Rocky Mountain F r o n t C A Northeast Montana WM D Lords Lake WMD Cape M e a r Saddle M o u n Ridgef i e l d Lostwood Nine-Pipe Snyder Lake Three A r c h R o c k s J. Clark Salyer o 45 es North Dakotatain National Bis o n R a n g Benton Lake McNary Conboy L a k e UL Bend Pleasan t Lake 95 Lake Alice Shell Lake Nestucc a B a y 90 Pierce WMA Portland Benton Lake WMD e Silver Lake Oregon I s l a n d s 82 29 Wapa Lake to Buffalo Lake Hiddenwood Wintering River Sullys Hill McNary Blackfoot L a k e S u p e r i o r Franz L a k e Missoula 84 Siletz B a y Steiger w a l d L a k e Cottonwood Lake Moosehor n Tualati n R i v e r Valley CA Grand Fo rks Umatilla McLean Lake Otis Charles M. Russell Cross Isla n d Sunkhaze M e a d o w s Camp Lake Wood Lake Cold Spri n g s Charles M. Russell W M D Audubon Baskett S l o u g h Lee Metcalf Johnson Lake Sheyenne Lake Lake Nettie War Horse Carlton Po n d W P A Lake Ilo Bangor Salem Oregon Audubon WMD McKay Cr e e k Sibley Lake Helena Ankeny Lost Lake Silvio O. Co nt e Islands Flor ence Lake Petit M a n a n Seal Islan d Arr o w w ood Lake Mason Umbagog Huron Arrowwood WMD Canfield Lake William L . F i n l e Hutchinson Lake 90 Tomahawk NFWR Chase Lake Prairie Project WMD Missisquoi Chase Lake Lamesteer Augusta Bismarck 94 Butte Hobart Lake Long Lake WMD y Duluth Petit Ma n a n 5 Half-Way Lake Harbor Island Dakota Grassland CA White Lake Seney Slade Valley CityHailstone Eugene Lake Geor g e Oregon I s l a n d s Long Lake Silvio O. Co n t e WMD Rice Whittlesey Creek P Frond Island anklin Isla n d St on e y Sl ou gh Grass Lake 94 Lake Patricia 75 Lak e Appert Lake Bone Hill Bandon M a r 35 Billings Stewart Lake Sunburst Lake NFWR Storm LakeKulm WMD Burlington Springwater Pretty Rock sh Montpelier Tewaukon L Portland 93 Wild Rice Lake Maple River Michigan Islands WMD Mille Lacs Rachel Carson aDakota Lake Red Rock Te w auk on kDeer Flat Oreg o n89 Sand Lake Dakot a Tallgr ass Green Bay Dakota Grassland CA eLakes Sherburne John Hay Michigan Islands Deer Flat Prairie WMA Gravel Island Sand Lake WMD 87 H90 Waubay Great Bay 29 Concord Parker Rive r 84 Kirtlands Warbler s Big St one Klamath M a r s h Thacher Isla n d St. Croix WMD l Waubay WMD andsLitchfield WMD oL k e M i c h i g a n 95 Silvio O. Co n t e 81 Dakota Tallgrass Prairie WMA Boise i Minneapolis WMA Camas Castle R o c k 93 Malheur St Paul u Great Mead o w s Wapack rUpper Kl a m a 15 NFWR Deer Flat aOxbow r o n tth Boston Green Bay Bear Va l l e y O nAssabet Rive r 91 Kirtlands Warbler a k e Syracuse Lower Kl a m a Hart Mou n Massasoit Minnesota Trempealeau Albany 75 Michigan Islands Bear Butte Minnesot a Necedah 43 Valleytain Pierre Lth National A n t e l o p e R a n g WMA IroquoisNational Elk Trus Sachuestom Pondt Point Monomo Nantuck y et 90 Providence WMD Montezuma Huron WMD Valley Springfield 25 Tule Refuge Humbol d t B a 94 90 88 Rapid City Mashpee Clear Lak Grays Lake Silvio O. Co n t ee Lake Necedah Hartford e F ox Riv er y Minidoka Madison WMD Buffalo NFWR Shiawassee WMA Modoc Pocatello 90 Horicon 95 John H. Chaf e e Nomans La n d 35 Sheldon Great Thicke t Upper Mississippi River 86 Shawangunk Ninigret Leopold WMD Island Grand Rapids 69 40 Block Islan d NWFR Grasslands o 91 o Amagansett Stewart B. Lansing 94 40 Oxford Sloug h W P 86 Iowa WMD Lacreek WMD 75 r i eLake Andes WMD Casper McKinney A 84 Conscience P oi n t Milwaukee 96 Lacreek Madison Elizabeth A. M o r t o n Lak e Andes Bear Lake Michigan WMD Oyster Bay Target Rock Bear River W a t e r s h e d C A E Scranton Northeast C a n y o ns Detroit River Karl E. Mundt Fort Niobrara Wallkill River Driftless Area Detroit and Seam o u nt s M N M Pathfinder 43 International Wertheim Cokeville 84 94 eSeatuck Seedskadee Wildlife Refuge Meadows Erie k94 Hackmatack 80 New York Cherry Valley aValentine West Sister Island 90 Great Swam p Sacram e n t o Bear River Upper Mississippi River Sacrame n t o R i v e r LCedar Point 79 Migratory Bird R e f u g e Cleveland North Platte Chicago NWFR Willow C r e e k - L u r l i n e W M A Toledo Delevan 90 Ottawa Anaho Isl a n d 80 80 John W. and Louise Seier 90 80 Cedar Rapids 81 Trenton Crescent Lake Colusa P ort Louisa A T L A N T IC O C E A N Butte Si n k W M A Philadelphia Edwin B. For s y t h e Bamforth Fallon 80 76 Ohio River Isla n d s North C e n 80 Des Moines 88 Mortenson Lake Harrisburg Sutter John Heinz N W R Reno 76 Salt Lake City Ruby Lake tral Vall e y W M A Neal Smith 5 Cheyenne Fort Wayne 99 at Tinicum SupawanaHutton Lake 71 Pittsburgh Browns Park 80 Stillwater Chautauqua 75 80 Carson Ci t y 83 Port Louisa Meadows 69 San Pab l o B a y Colorado River W M A Susquehanna Bombay Hoo kArapaho 74 Kankakee Ohio River Island s 80 77 Sacrame n t o Provo Farallon I s l a n d s Marin Is l a n d s 80 65 Fish Springs 55 39 Cape May NWR and CA Stone La k e s 76 Baltimore Fort Collins Peoria Ouray 70 Dover Eastern Neck Patuxent Rese a r c h R e f u g e Prime Hook 68 57 Columbus Chautauqua Antioc h D u n e s Rainwater Basin WMD 70 NN ortheasortheas t Cant Canyy onsons Oakland San Fran c i s c o Annapolis Rocky Flats and Seamounand Seamounts MNts MN MM Don Ed w a r d s - Emiquon35 15 74 Elizabeth Hart w el l San Fra n c i s c o B a y Gr ea t Riv er San Joaq u i n R i v Washington Two Ponds Rocky Mountain Arsenal Ohio River Island s Canaan Valley 66 Meredosia 79 Mason San Jose Occoquan Bay er Indianapolis Blackwater Ellicott S l o u g h Chincoteagu e Denver Springfield Colorado River WM A Featherstone San Luis Neck S w an Lak e Cincinnati 74 P A C I F I C O C E A N Salinas R i v Martin Wallops Islan d 72 Merced 25 70 Big Oaks Kir win er Chincoteagu e Rappahannock Ri v e r V a l l e y 95 70 55 Gr ea t Riv er Grasslan d s W M A 29 RivColorer WMA ado Muscatatuck70 81 Clarence Cannon E Fisherman Isl a n d astern Shore o f Vi r gi ni a Two Rivers Charleston Ohio River A N Fresno Huntington Richmond Kansas City Islands 75 Kansas City 71 70 Pahranagat Patoka River Big Muddy NFWR Presquile 64 64 64 Frankfort James River St Louis Plum Tree Isla n d Virginia Bea c h Norfolk MiddleFl in t Hill s Jefferson City Louisville Lexington Back Ba Macka yy Island Moapa MississippiLeg acy CA Desert Nansemond 77 64 Pueblo 35 Evansville AshPixley Blue Rid g Valley Fl in t Hill s River 35 Currituck Baca Great Dismal S w a m p o Meadows 5 85 e O C E Kern Quivi r a Crab o 15 35 Tulare Ba s i n W M A Monte Vista Orchard Alligator Rive r Alamosa RoNipomo D u n e s Guadalu p e - anLas Vegas oPilot Knob Cypress ke River Wichita 44 Sangre de Cristo CA 65 Pea Island Creek 95 Bakersfiel d Ozark Cavefish Mountain Bogs Greensboro Mingo Mattamuske e t Pocosin Lake s Bitter Cr e e k Springfield Raleigh Clarks 81 Winston-Salem Swanquarter 15 River Maxwell 75 Cedar Island Cross Creeks Optima Knoxville Salt Plains Hopper M o u n Reelfoot Nashville tain 55 Los Angel e s 25 40 Lake Isom Asheville Tennessee Rio Mora NWR and CA Pee Dee 40 Havasu Charlotte 40 Flagstaff 75 San Bernar d i n o Santa Fe Chickasaw 26 Big Lake Seal Beac h Las Vegas 40 Lo wer Hatchie Carolina Sandhil l s 40 Coachella V Hatchie Wilmington Greenville Washita Wapanocca Chattanooga Deep Fork Sequoyah 24 alley Bill Williams R i v Albuquerque 40 Bald 65 40 Amarillo Oklahoma City 85 Holla Cache River er Valle de Oro 77 K nob Fort Smith Memphis 10 5 Fern Cave Key Cave Bend 40 15 17 Sonn Salty Bono on Sea Buffalo Lake Sauta Cibola Columbia San Dieg San Dieg o Ba o y San Diego Phoenix Sevilleta Cave Waccamaw Wheeler 95 20 10 Kofa 27 Little Rock Wichita Mountains 35 55 Santee 59 Tijuana Sl o u g h Dale Bumpers Mountain8 Tishomingo Grulla Imperial Coldwater River 30 White River Cape Romain Bosque del Apache Muleshoe Longleaf Atlanta Ernest F. Holling s 20 Yuma Little River Watercress Darter Tallahatchie A N T I C 8 ACE Basin 26 Pond Creek Dahomey Cabeza Prieta Charleston Birmingham Bitter Lake 25 Lubbock Roswell Piedmont Hagerman Sam D. Hamilton 85 F elsen thal Mathews Brake Macon Holt Bond Swamp Cahaba River Noxubee Morgan Brake Pinckney Island Collier Overflow Hillside Tucson Yaz oo Savannah Tybee R ed Riv er 16 Theodore Roosevelt 30 San Andres o Columbus Wassaw Upper Ouachita Savannah Handy Brake o 30 Panther Swamp 19 Montgomery 10 Black Bayou Lake Harris Neck Buenos Aires D'Arbonne Leslie Canyon Meridian Eufaula Caddo Lake Fort Worth 75 Blackbeard Islan d Shreveport A T L20 20 20 65 Jackson 95 San Bernardino Tensas Riv er Wolf Island El Paso R ed Riv er 49 Choctaw R ed Riv er Bayou Cocodrie Banks Lake R ed Riv er Catahoula Okefenokee 20 Jacksonville St. Catherine Creek Lake Ophelia Mississippi55 Mobile Tallahassee SandhillCat Island 10 10 Grand Cote Bogue Chitto Crane Grand Bay 59 75 St. Marks 35 Biloxi Baton Rouge Atchafalaya 12 Bon Secour 10 Big Branch Marsh Bayou Sauvage Lake Woodru f f Lac assine 10 St. Vincent Sabine Lower Suwannee New Orleans eton Cedar Keys Bayou Teche Cameron Prairie rB Merritt Island St. Johns Anahuac Te x as P oin t Crystal River 10 Mandalay McF addin Everglades Head w a t e r s N W R a n d C A Delta Orlando Shell Keys Chassahowitzka San Antonio Archie Carr Pelican Island Lake Wa les R idge Tampa M E X I C O 4 95 37 GULF OF CALI FORNI A 35 Pinellas Hobe Sound Egmont Key Passage Key BAHAMAS Arthur R. Marsh a l l -25 o Caloosahatchee Corpus Christi Island Bay Loxahatchee o 25 Matlacha Pass Pine Island J. N. "Ding" Darli n g Florida Panther 75 Miami Ten Thousand Islands Lo w er Rio Gr ande 25 Valley Crocodile Lake CARIB B E Ponce National Key De e r 18 30'o G U L F O F M E X I C O A Great White Hero n N SEA Key West 17 30'o TROPIC OF CANCER TROPIC OF CANCE R C U B A U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service National Wildlife Refuge System 150 145o150 155 160 165 170 175 E o175 W 170 165 160 155 140 135 130 o125 o 120 115 oo o oo o o oo o oo o o o oo180 A aiMOLOKA’I Kakahai‘a MAUI 170 o 180 175 W 170 165 160 155 150 145165 175 E o Kellys Slough Stump Lake Little Goose Marais des PACIFIC ISLANDS 0 200 400 MILES 0 300 600 KILOMETERS SCALE 1:29,000,000 o oAlbers equal area projection, standard parallels 7 S and 20 N, ocentral meridian 174 30' E Wake Atoll NWR and Pacific Remote Islands MN M Nowitna Howland Island NWR and Pacific Remote Islands MNMTARAWA (KIRIBATI) NAURU WALLIS (FRANCE) L150 o 160 o 170 o E 180 o 170 o W 160 o Kodiak Alaska Maritimeo o o160 158 156 Hanalei Kilauea Point ALASKA22o Hulē‘ia James Campbell KodiakKAUA’I SCALE 1:7,500,000NI’IHAU O’AHU o oAlbers equal area projection, standard parallels 55 N and 65 N,O'ahu Forest Pearl Harbor ocentral meridian 154 WHonolulu LĀNA’I Keālia Pond KAHO’OLAWE 20o Hakalau ForestPrincipal Islands of Hilo HAWAII Kona Forest UnitHAWAI’ISCALE 1:7,500,000 o oAlbers equal area projection, standard parallels 8 N and 18 N, central meridian 157o W Fairbanks 140 135o o ooo o o o Washington o oo 125 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 o70 65o o oo o o o o o oo o120 San JuanGuam Honolulu A American Samoa Beltrami WMA AgassizArdoch Devils Lake WMD Rose Lake Lambs Lake RydellGlacial Ridge Hamden Slough Tamarac Fargo Tamarac WMD Detroit Lakes WMD Fergus Falls WMD Crane Meado ws Morris WMD 94Northern Tallgrass Prairie BigStone WMD Northern Tallgr ass Prairie Windom WMD 90 Sioux Falls Union Slough Northern Tallgrass Prairie Sioux City -7-7 -6-60°0° -6-69°9° -6-68°8° -6-67°7° 6°6°-7-71°1° 40°40°42°42°41°41°39°39° Desoto Boyer Chut e Omaha Lincoln Loess Bluffs SCSCALE 1:10,000,000ALE 1:10,000,000 Topeka Cygnes Ozark Refuge units ofPlateau Red Rock LakesLogan Ca veTulsa 20,000 acres or more Refuge units of less Washitathan 20,000 acres Wetland Management Fergus Falls WMDDistrict Offices Waterfowl Production Carlton Pond WPAAreas Marine National Monuments Some refuges are represented as dots where easement acreage exceeds 20,000 acres. Refuges as shown may contain inholdings. Abbreviations CA: Conservation Area MNM: Marine National Monument* NFWR: National Fish and Wildlife RefugeDallas NWFR: National Wildlife and Fish RefugeLittle Sandy NWR: National Wildlife Refuge WMA: Wildlife Management Area Neches River WMD: Wetland Management District Office** WPA : Waterfowl Production Area * Marine National Monuments are conservation areas established through the Antiquities Act, managed by the USFWS in cooperation with other45 federal, state, territorial and private partners. Balcones Can yonlands ** WMD offices manage Waterfowl Production Areas which are not shown due to scale. Please visit http://gis.fws.gov/WPA_Mapper/ for an interactive map to view WPAs and Refuges in more detail. Austin Trinity Riv er HoustonAttw ater Prairie Chicken Moody 10 City State Capital Intersta te Freeway National Capital StatesWhen President Theodore Roosevelt made Florida's tiny Pelican Island a refuge for birds in 1903, he wrote the first chapter of a great American conservation success story. Entering its second century, the National Wildlife Refuge System comprises 150 million Brazoria San BernardBig Boggyacres, protected within more than 566 Refuges and thousands of small prairie wetlands that serve as waterfowl breeding and nesting areas. There are wildlife refuges in every state, and at least one within an hour's drive of every major American city, providing SCALE 1:7,500,000 Download a copy at: www.fws.gov/refuges/maps/ Aransas 0 100 200 300 400 MILES refuge for people as well as wildlife. 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 KILOMETERSNational Wildlife Refuges are far more than havens for wild plants and animals. In fact, visitors–more than 40 million each year–are welcome on 98 percent of wildlife refuges,where they are encouraged to take part in outdoor pursuits designated by law as priority activities offered by the National Wildlife Refuge System. From environmental education and interpretation to hunting and fishing to photography and wildlife watching, o o oAlbers equal area projection, standard parallels 29 30'N and 45 30'N, central meridian 96 W 68o 66o 64o Produced in the Division of Realty, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service A T LA N T I C O C E A Nrefuges offer visitors a truly natural and wild outdoor experience, teaching millions the o18 30' San Juan Desecheo Culebra USBase Map Source: U.S. Geological Surveyimportance of taking care of our natural resources. UK Laguna Cartagena Buck Island76oLaguna Atascosa 75o 74o Navassa IslandJanuary 3, 2018 ViequesThis map shows lands and waters managed in the National Wildlife Refuge System. Private holdings exist within some of these boundaries. Green CayLower Rio Gr ande Valley Cabo RojoSanta Ana Sandy Point C A R I B B E A N S E AHAITI o17 30' JAMAICAThe U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service is a Federal Agency whose mission, working with others, is to conserve fish and wildlife and their habitats for the continuing benefit of theAmerican people. Puerto Rico and the Virgin IslandsNavassa Island SCALE 1:7,500,000SCALE 1:7,500,000 o oAlbers equal area projection, standard parallels 8 N and 18 N, central meridian 66 30'Wo Same projection parameters as Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands inset map 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75o oo o oo o oo Page 1071 of 4908 USFWS National Wildlife Refuges‐ Florida https://www.fws.gov/refuges/refugelocatormaps/Florida.html Page 1072 of 4908 ATTACHMENT 3 LISTED/PROPOSED THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES Page 1073 of 4908 8/9/22, 7:44 AM Tower Engineering Professionals Mail - Proposed Telecommunications Tower Undertaking “Palmetto Ridge 2 (US-FL-5283)” in Coll… https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=4a95b507f6&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1740620639420395846&simpl=msg-f%3A17406206394…1/2 Logan Michel <lmichel@tepgroup.net> Proposed Telecommunications Tower Undertaking “Palmetto Ridge 2 (US-FL-5283)” in Collier County 1 message DiGruttolo, Laura <Laura.DiGruttolo@myfwc.com>Mon, Aug 8, 2022 at 12:59 PM To: "lmichel@tepgroup.net" <lmichel@tepgroup.net> Cc: Conservation Planning Services <conservationplanningservices@myfwc.com>, "Cucinella, Josh" <Josh.Cucinella@myfwc.com>, "Calyniuk, Cori" <Cori.Calyniuk@myfwc.com> Dear Mr. Michel: Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) staff received your group’s request for review regarding a proposed “Palmetto Ridge 2 (US-FL-5283)” wireless telecommunications tower within the vicinity of 31st Avenue NE, Naples, Collier County. We have no comments, recommendations, or objections related to state-listed species and their habitat or other fish and wildlife resources to offer on this project. The liability to not impact or cause “take” of listed species, migratory wildlife, and other regulated species of wildlife is the responsibility of the applicant or developer associated with this site. Please refer to the Chapter 68A-27, Florida Administrative Code, for definitions of “take” and a list of species. If listed species are observed onsite in the future, FWC staff are available to provide decision support information or assist in obtaining the appropriate permits. For additional information regarding projects like this, you may also want to review resources provided by other agencies regarding potential requirements for this project: https://www.fws.gov/story/incidental-take-beneficial-practices-communication-towers If you need further information or review, please let us know. Requests for further information or review can be sent to ConservationPlanningServices@MyFWC.com and we will ensure your request is received by the appropriate staff. Thank you for contacting the FWC. Sincerely, Laura DiGruttolo Biological Administrator II Office of Conservation Planning Services Page 1074 of 4908 8/9/22, 7:44 AM Tower Engineering Professionals Mail - Proposed Telecommunications Tower Undertaking “Palmetto Ridge 2 (US-FL-5283)” in Coll… https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=4a95b507f6&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1740620639420395846&simpl=msg-f%3A17406206394…2/2 Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission 620 S. Meridian Street, MS 5B5 Tallahassee, FL 32399-1600 (850) 728-5147 Page 1075 of 4908 COMMUNICATIONS TOWER SITE EVALUATION FORM 1.Location (Provide maps if possible):31st Ave. NE State:FL County:Collier Latitude/Longitude/GPS Grid:26°17’21.52” N,81°32’39.23” W City and Highway Direction:Driving directions from the South Florida Ecological Services Field Office:Head south on County Road 605/Old Dixie Hwy toward 19th Place for 2.5-miles, then turn left onto 1st street for 0.3-miles, then turn right onto US-1 S for 3.4-miles, then keep right to continue to Turnpike Feeder Rd. for 3.6-miles, then continue onto FL-713 S. In 5.2-miles, take a slight left turn onto FL-713 and proceed straight for 1.9-miles before turning right onto FL- 70 W. In 30.8-miles, turn left onto SE 3rd Ave for 0.2-miles then turn right onto SE 3rd Street for 0.1-miles. Turn left at the 2nd cross street onto US-441 S/US-98 S/S Parrott Ave for 3-miles, then turn right onto FL-78 W for 34.2-miles, then turn left onto US-27 S for 7.3-miles, then exit onto FL-80 W toward La Belle/Ft. Meyers. In 3.3-miles turn left onto County Rd. 833 S. for 20.2- miles, then continue straight onto County Rd. 846 for 11.2-miles, then turn left onto County Line Rd. for 7.7-miles (County Line Rd. turns right and becomes Oil Well Rd., proceed on this road for 17.4-miles), then turn left onto Everglades Blvd N.for 0.3-miles, then turn left at the 2st cross street onto 31st Ave. NE.In approximately 300-ft, the proposed tower compound will be on the left. 2.Elevation above mean sea level:6,382.68-ft.AMSL 3.Will the equipment be co-located on an existing FCC licensed tower or other existing structure (building, water tank, etc)?NO.If yes, type of structure:N/A 4.If yes, will the compound be expanded:N/A If yes,will the tower be extended:N/A 5.If No, provide proposed specifications for the new tower: Height:180-ft (184-ft overall with appurtenances) Construction Type (lattice, monopole, etc.):Self-support Guyed-Wire?NO.Bands:0 Total No. Wires:0 Lighting (Security and Aviation):The proposed tower is anticipated to be unlit. 6.Area of tower footprint in acres or square feet:Tower compound lease area:approximately 10,000-sq.ft.(~0.23-acres) Access & Utility easement:Option #1:approximately 2,320-sq.ft.(~0.053-acres); option #2: approximately 10,400-sq-ft. (~0.239-acres). 7.Length and width of access road in feet:Option #1: the proposed 20-ft wide access and utility easement will proceed north from a portion of 31st Ave. NE for approximately 116-ft before reaching the proposed tower compound facility.The proposed access and utility easement will proceed through an existing cleared/agricultural area before reaching the proposed tower compound; Option #2: the proposed 20-ft wide access and utility easement will proceed east from a portion of Everglades Blvd. N. for approximately 400-ft, then proceed south for approximately 120-ft until reaching the proposed tower compound facility. Page 1076 of 4908 8.General description of terrain (mountains,rolling hills, flat, flat to undulating, etc.).Photographs of the site and surrounding area are beneficial:generally flat agricultural land. 9.Meteorological conditions (incidence of fog, low ceilings, rain, etc.):June 21, 2022;clear skies, approximately 85°F, with clear visibility. 10.Soil Type(s):According to the USDA Web Soil Survey of Collier County, FL,soil within the proposed lease area is identified as Immokalee fine sand-Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes. Immokalee fine-sand-Urban land complex is described as poorly drained, found on flatwoods on marine terraces, and formed from sandy marine deposits. A typical profile for Immokalee fine sand- Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes consists of fine sand from 0 to 80-inches below ground surface (BGS). 11.Habitat types and land use on and adjacent to the site: Habitat Type:Acreage:Percentage of Total: Undeveloped/agricultural land ~0.255 90% Maintained grass lawn ~0.029 10% Adjacent land use:low-density residential,sparsely forested, agricultural, and swamp land. 12.Dominant vegetative species in each habitat type:Agricultural field 13.Average diameter breast height of dominant tree species in forested areas:~2 to 4-inches 14.Will construction at this site cause fragmentation of a larger block of habitat into two or more smaller blocks? Y/N NO If yes, describe: 15.Is evidence of bird roosts or rookeries present? Y/N NO If yes, describe:None in immediate vicinity of proposed action area. 16.Distance to nearest wetland area (forested swamp, marsh, riparian, marine,etc.), and coastline, if applicable:According to the USFWS NWI Mapper,the closest surface water feature is described as a freshwater emergent wetland and is located approximately 760-ft.east of the proposed tower centerline. 17.Distance to nearest telecommunications tower:According to the FCC Antenna Structure Registration search,the closest registered structure is located approximately 6.8-miles east- northeast from the proposed tower. 18.Potential for co-location of antennas on existing towers or other structures:Unknown 19.Have measures been incorporated for minimizing impacts to migratory birds? Y/N YES If yes, describe:The proposed tower will be under 200-ft tall,will not utilize guy wires,and will not be located within a wetland, forested area, mountaintop, ridgeline, coastline,or in any other area known to have frequent foggy conditions. 20.Has an evaluation been made to determine if the proposed facility may affect listed or proposed endangered or threatened species or their habitats as required by FCC regulations at 47 CFR 1.1307(a)(3)? Y/N YES If yes, present findings:The Official Species List for the project (Project Code: 2022-0067150) dated July 25, 2022 indicated the possible presence of seven (7) federally endangered terrestrial species:Florida bonneted bat (Eumops floridanus),Florida panther (Puma Page 1077 of 4908 concolor coryi),Everglade snail kite (Rostrhamus sociabilis plumbeus),Bartram's hairstreak butterfly (Strymon acis bartrami),Florida leafwing butterfly (Anaea troglodyta floridalis),Miami blue butterfly (Cyclargus thomasi bethunebakeri),Florida prairie-clover (Dalea carthagenensis floridana);one (1)federally listed threatened terrestrial species due to similarity of appearance: puma (Puma concolor: all subsp.except coryi); one (1) federally listed threatened aquatic species due to similarity of appearance:American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis);two (2) threatened terrestrial species:Audubon's crested caracara (Polyborus plancus audubonii)and wood stork (Mycteria americana);and two (2) federally threatened aquatic species:loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta) and Atlantic Sturgeon (gulf Subspecies)(Acipenser oxyrhynchus).No officially designated critical habitats were identified on or in the vicinity of the proposed action area. The site inspection performed on June 21, 2022 consisted of a pedestrian inspection of the proposed action area and immediate vicinity for indications of the presence of federally listed species and/or their critical habitats and preferred/suitable habitats, as described by the USFWS. At the time of the June 21,2022 site inspection, the proposed action area was observed to have been previously disturbed by cleared/agricultural operations. Therefore, given the previous disturbances observed and the lack of suitable habitat present at the time of the site inspection, it is the opinion of TEP that the proposed action will have no effect on federally endangered and threatened species. Summary of effects on federally listed endangered terrestrial species Florida bonneted bat (Eumops floridanus): According to the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC), the Florida bonneted bat roosts colonially. Roost sites are poorly understood for this species, but have included buildings and other man-made structures and tree cavities. Based on the habitat description, it appears no suitable roosting habitat exists within the vicinity of the proposed action area. Therefore,it is the opinion of TEP that the proposed undertaking will have no effect on the Florida bonneted bat. Florida panther (Puma concolor coryi): According to the FFWCC, the Florida panther occurs in peninsular Floriday primarily south of Orlando. They use all habitat types to some degree but rely upon forested areas that provide dense understory vegetation for rest sites, den sites, and stalking cover.Based on the habitat description, it appears no suitable roosting habitat exists within the vicinity of the proposed action area. Therefore,it is the opinion of TEP that the proposed undertaking will have no effect on the Florida panther. Everglade snail kite (Rostrhamus sociabilis plumbeus): According to the FFWCC, Everglade snail kites inhabit shallow freshwater marshes and shallow grassy shorelines of lakes. They can primarily be found in the Kissimmee Valley, St. Johns River headwaters, Lake Okeechobee, Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge, Water Conservation Areas 2A, 2B, 3A, 3B, in Broward, Palm Beach and Dade counties; and sections of Big Cypress National Preserve and Everglades National Park.Due to the habitat description and proximity of the proposed tower compound to freshwater marshes and shallow grassy shorelines of lakes, is the opinion of TEP that the proposed undertaking will have no effect on Everglade snail kite. Bartram's hairstreak butterfly (Strymon acis bartrami): According to the National Park Service (NPS), the Bartram's scrub-hairstreak once occurred in pine rockland habitat throughout Miami- Dade and Monroe counties. Over time,their populations have declined throughout their historic range for various reasons. This species can still be found in a few pine rockland fragments in Miami-Dade County and on Big Pine Key in the lower Florida Keys. Based on the habitat description and lack of pine rockland fragments within the vicinity of the APE, it is the opinion of TEP that the proposed undertaking will have no effect on Bartram’s hairstreak butterfly. Page 1078 of 4908 Florida leafwing butterfly (Anaea troglodyta floridalis): According to the NPS, the Florida leafwing is native to the pine rockland habitat of south Florida. However, similar to the Everglade snail kite, their historic population range has declined and their distribution is now extremely limited. This species has not been seen outside of Everglades NP since 2007—scientists now believe that Everglades NP is the only place in the world where the Florida leafwing is found. Based on habitat descriptions and presumed species distribution,it is the opinion of TEP that the proposed undertaking will have no effect on Florida leafwing butterfly. Miami blue butterfly (Cyclargus thomasi bethunebakeri): According to the FFWCC, the Miami blue butterfly inhabits tropial hardwood hammocks, tropical pine rocklands, and beachside scrub in Florida. This species was presumed to have disappeared from the mainland by the 1980s, but was rediscovered in Key West National Wildlife Refugre in 2006.Based on habitat descriptions and presumed species distribution,it is the opinion of TEP that the proposed undertaking will have no effect on Miami blue butterfly. Florida Prairie-clover (Dalea carthagenensis floridana): According to the Lady Bird Johnosn Wildflower Center of the University of Texas at Austin, this species occurs in pine rocklands, edges of rockland hammocks, coastal uplands,and marl prairie.Based on the habitat description, it appears no suitable habitat exists within or in the vicinity of the proposed action area. Therefore,it is the opinion of TEP that the proposed undertaking will have no effect on the Florida prairie-clover. Summary of effects on federally listed threatened terrestrial species due to similarity of appearance Puma (Puma concolor: all subsp.except coryi): According to the U.S. Forest Service,in North America substantial mountain lion populations occur only in the western United States and Canada, and these ranges have been reduced from pre-settlement times.Isolated populations and incidental sightings have been reported in the central and eastern United States.At present the only known mountain lion population east of Texas exists in southern Florida,although a small population may exist in western Arkansas and eastern Oklahoma.Based on habitat descriptions and presumed species distribution,it is the opinion of TEP that the proposed undertaking will have no effect on the Puma (Puma concolor: all subsp.except coryi). Summary of effects on federally listed threatened aquatic species due to similarity of appearance: American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis): According to the National Wildlife Federation, American alligators can be found in the coastal wetlands of the U.S. Southeast, as far north as North Carolina and as far west as eastern Texas. Their range extends down to southern Florida and includes the Everglades. These reptiles are usually found in slow-moving freshwater rivers, but also inhabit swamps, marshes, and lakes.Based on the habitat description and lack of aquatic habitats within the vicinity of the APE, it is the opinion of TEP that the proposed undertaking will have no effect on American alligator. Summary of effects on federally listed threatened terrestrial species Audubon's crested caracara (Polyborus plancus audubonii): According to the FFWCC, the crested caracara inhabits wet prairies with cabbage palms. It may also be found in wooded areas with saw palmetto, cypress, scrub oaks and pastures. This species is found throughout south- central Florida and also occurs in Texas, Arkansas,Mexico, Cuba, and Panama.Based on the habitat description,it appears no suitable habitat exists within or in the vicinity of the proposed Page 1079 of 4908 action area. Therefore,it is the opinion of TEP that the proposed undertaking will have no effect on Audubon’s crested caracara, Wood stork (Mycteria americana): According to Audubon, this species is typically found in cypress swamps (nesting colonies), marshes, ponds, and lagoons. They typically forage in fresh water, including shallow marshes,flooded farm fields, ponds,and ditches.They typically nest in stands of tall cypress and sometimes in mangroves and dead trees in flooded impoundments. Based on the habitat description,it appears no suitable habitat exists within or in the vicinity of the proposed action area. Therefore,it is the opinion of TEP that the proposed undertaking will have no effect on the wood stork. Summary of effects on federally listed threatened aquatic species: Loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta):According to the Texas Department of Parks and Wildlife (TPWD),Loggerheads are capable of living in a variety of environments, such as in brackish waters of coastal lagoons, river mouths, and tropical and temperate waters above 50 degrees Fahrenheit.Based on the habitat description and lack of aquatic habitats within the vicinity of the APE, it is the opinion of TEP that the proposed undertaking will have no effect on loggerhead sea turtle. Atlantic Sturgeon (gulf Subspecies)(Acipenser oxyrhynchus): According to the Florida Museum, gulf sturgeons have a limited habitat, living in the Gulf of Mexico most of the time, and then swimming up rivers to spawn.Based on the habitat description and lack of aquatic habitats within the vicinity of the APE, it is the opinion of TEP that the proposed undertaking will have no effect on gulf sturgeon. Additionally, TEP personnel reviewed the FFWCC’s state list of threatened and endangered species and identified thirty-nine (39) state threatened species and one (1) state species of special concern (SSC) as occurring within the State of Florida.Given the previous disturbances observed within the proposed action area associated with the historic agricultural use of this property, it is the opinion of TEP that the proposed action will have no effect on state protected species. Minimizing Impacts to Migratory Birds protected under the MBTA: The following siting and construction details were implemented in an attempt to comply with the recommendations of the Memorandum of Understanding, directed by the President of the U.S. under the Executive Order 13186, for minimizing impacts to migratory birds protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the USFWS Interim Guidelines for Recommendations on Communications Tower Siting, Construction,Operation, and Decommissioning.The proposed tower is less than 200-ft AGL and will not utilize guy wires, minimizing the impacts to migratory birds.The tower will also not be located in a wetland or in an area with high incidence of fog (e.g.,forested area, mountaintop, ridgeline, coastline).Additionally, with regards to the Bald Eagle & Golden Eagle Protection Act,no active or abandoned nests were observed in the vicinity of the proposed action area at the time of inspection. Page 1080 of 4908 July 25, 2022 United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Florida Ecological Services Field Office FL Email Address: fw4flesregs@fws.gov https://www.fws.gov/office/florida-ecological-services In Reply Refer To: Project Code: 2022-0067150 Project Name: Palmetto Ridge 2 (US-FL-5283) Subject:List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project location or may be affected by your proposed project To Whom It May Concern: The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Feel free to contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical habitat. Please include your Project Code, listed at the top of this letter, in all subsequent correspondence regarding this project. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list. The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or designated critical habitat. Page 1081 of 4908 07/25/2022 2 A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2) (c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biological evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12. If a Federal agency determines, based on the Biological Assessment or biological evaluation, that listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected by the proposed project, the agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service recommends that candidate species, proposed species and proposed critical habitat be addressed within the consultation. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7 consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, can be found in the "Endangered Species Consultation Handbook" at: http://www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/TOC-GLOS.PDF Migratory Birds: In addition to responsibilities to protect threatened and endangered species under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), there are additional responsibilities under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) to protect native birds from project-related impacts. Any activity, intentional or unintentional, resulting in take of migratory birds, including eagles, is prohibited unless otherwise permitted by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)). For more information regarding these Acts see https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations.php. The MBTA has no provision for allowing take of migratory birds that may be unintentionally killed or injured by otherwise lawful activities. It is the responsibility of the project proponent to comply with these Acts by identifying potential impacts to migratory birds and eagles within applicable NEPA documents (when there is a federal nexus) or a Bird/Eagle Conservation Plan (when there is no federal nexus). Proponents should implement conservation measures to avoid or minimize the production of project-related stressors or minimize the exposure of birds and their resources to the project-related stressors. For more information on avian stressors and recommended conservation measures see https://www.fws.gov/birds/bird-enthusiasts/threats-to- birds.php. In addition to MBTA and BGEPA, Executive Order 13186: Responsibilities of Federal Agencies to Protect Migratory Birds, obligates all Federal agencies that engage in or authorize activities that might affect migratory birds, to minimize those effects and encourage conservation measures that will improve bird populations. Executive Order 13186 provides for the protection of both migratory birds and migratory bird habitat. For information regarding the implementation of Executive Order 13186, please visit https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations/ executive-orders/e0-13186.php. We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Code in the header of Page 1082 of 4908 07/25/2022 3 ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project that you submit to our office. Attachment(s): Official Species List USFWS National Wildlife Refuges and Fish Hatcheries Migratory Birds Wetlands Page 1083 of 4908 07/25/2022 1 Official Species List This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed action". This species list is provided by: Florida Ecological Services Field Office , FL Page 1084 of 4908 07/25/2022 2 Project Summary Project Code:2022-0067150 Project Name:Palmetto Ridge 2 (US-FL-5283) Project Type:Communication Tower New Construction Project Description:Proposed construction of a 180-ft AGL (184-ft AGL overall) self-support telecommunications tower, to be located within a proposed 10,000-sq.ft. tower compound lease area and its associated approximately 20-ft wide x 100-ft long access and utility easement, and a proposed approximately 20- ft wide x 450-ft long access and utility easement. The proposed telecommunications facility will be located on the south-central portion of an approximately 5.15-acre parcel identified as Parcel ID 40171120002 by the Collier County, FL Assessor's Office. Total area of potential effect totals approximately 21,000-sq.ft. (~0.48-acres). Project Location: Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https:// www.google.com/maps/@26.28943635,-81.54423171779119,14z Counties:Collier County, Florida Page 1085 of 4908 07/25/2022 3 1. Endangered Species Act Species There is a total of 17 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list. Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species list because a project could affect downstream species. IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA Fisheries , as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the Department of Commerce. See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office if you have questions. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce. Mammals NAME STATUS Florida Bonneted Bat Eumops floridanus There is proposed critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8630 Endangered Florida Panther Puma (=Felis) concolor coryi No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1763 Endangered Puma (=mountain Lion) Puma (=Felis) concolor (all subsp. except coryi) Population: FL No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6049 Similarity of Appearance (Threatened) 1 Page 1086 of 4908 07/25/2022 4 Birds NAME STATUS Audubon's Crested Caracara Polyborus plancus audubonii Population: FL pop. No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8250 Threatened Eastern Black Rail Laterallus jamaicensis ssp. jamaicensis No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10477 Threatened Everglade Snail Kite Rostrhamus sociabilis plumbeus There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7713 Endangered Wood Stork Mycteria americana Population: AL, FL, GA, MS, NC, SC No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8477 General project design guidelines: https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/project/CROPHQPU3REJZFMX2GYRFDC6D4/documents/ generated/6954.pdf Threatened Reptiles NAME STATUS American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/776 Similarity of Appearance (Threatened) Eastern Indigo Snake Drymarchon couperi No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/646 Threatened Green Sea Turtle Chelonia mydas Population: North Atlantic DPS There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6199 Threatened Loggerhead Sea Turtle Caretta caretta Population: Northwest Atlantic Ocean DPS There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1110 Threatened Fishes NAME STATUS Gulf Sturgeon Acipenser oxyrinchus (=oxyrhynchus) desotoi There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/651 Threatened Page 1087 of 4908 07/25/2022 5 Insects NAME STATUS Bartram's Hairstreak Butterfly Strymon acis bartrami There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4837 Endangered Florida Leafwing Butterfly Anaea troglodyta floridalis There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6652 Endangered Miami Blue Butterfly Cyclargus (=Hemiargus) thomasi bethunebakeri No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3797 Endangered Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743 Candidate Flowering Plants NAME STATUS Florida Prairie-clover Dalea carthagenensis floridana Population: No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2300 Endangered Critical habitats THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S JURISDICTION. Page 1088 of 4908 07/25/2022 1 USFWS National Wildlife Refuge Lands And Fish Hatcheries Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a 'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to discuss any questions or concerns. THERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS OR FISH HATCHERIES WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA. Page 1089 of 4908 07/25/2022 1 1. 2. 3. Migratory Birds Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act . Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a) The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be found below. For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and breeding in your project area. NAME BREEDING SEASON American Kestrel Falco sparverius paulus This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9587 Breeds Apr 1 to Aug 31 Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities. Breeds Sep 1 to Jul 31 1 2 Page 1090 of 4908 07/25/2022 2 NAME BREEDING SEASON Great Blue Heron Ardea herodias occidentalis This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA Breeds Jan 1 to Dec 31 Gull-billed Tern Gelochelidon nilotica This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9501 Breeds May 1 to Jul 31 Lesser Yellowlegs Tringa flavipes This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9679 Breeds elsewhere Painted Bunting Passerina ciris This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA Breeds Apr 25 to Aug 15 Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. Breeds May 1 to Jul 31 Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. Breeds May 10 to Sep 10 Swallow-tailed Kite Elanoides forficatus This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8938 Breeds Mar 10 to Jun 30 Probability Of Presence Summary The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting to interpret this report. Probability of Presence () Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high. Page 1091 of 4908 07/25/2022 3 1. 2. 3. no data survey effort breeding season probability of presence How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps: The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is 0.25. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the probability of presence score. Breeding Season () Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time-frame inside which the bird breeds across its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project area. Survey Effort () Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys. No Data () A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week. Survey Timeframe Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse. SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC American Kestrel BCC - BCR Bald Eagle Non-BCC Vulnerable Page 1092 of 4908 07/25/2022 4 ▪ ▪ ▪ Great Blue Heron BCC - BCR Gull-billed Tern BCC Rangewide (CON) Lesser Yellowlegs BCC Rangewide (CON) Painted Bunting BCC - BCR Prairie Warbler BCC Rangewide (CON) Red-headed Woodpecker BCC Rangewide (CON) Swallow-tailed Kite BCC Rangewide (CON) Additional information can be found using the following links: Birds of Conservation Concern https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-birds/species Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/library/ collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take-migratory-birds Nationwide conservation measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/ documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-measures.pdf Migratory Birds FAQ Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds. Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or bird species present on your project site. What does IPaC use to generate the list of migratory birds that potentially occur in my specified location? The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location. Page 1093 of 4908 07/25/2022 5 1. 2. 3. The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or development. Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the Rapid Avian Information Locator (RAIL) Tool. What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location? The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets. Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these graphs" link. How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering or migrating in my area? To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering, migrating or year-round), you may query your location using the RAIL Tool and look at the range maps provided for birds in your area at the bottom of the profiles provided for each bird in your results. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area. What are the levels of concern for migratory birds? Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern: "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands); "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and "Non-BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non-eagles) potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities (e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing). Page 1094 of 4908 07/25/2022 6 Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics. Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf project webpage. Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring. What if I have eagles on my list? If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur. Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities, should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page. Page 1095 of 4908 07/25/2022 1 Wetlands Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes. For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of Engineers District. Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to update our NWI data set. We recommend you verify these results with a site visit to determine the actual extent of wetlands on site. THERE ARE NO WETLANDS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA. Page 1096 of 4908 07/25/2022 2 IPaC User Contact Information Agency:Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. Name:Logan Michel Address:500 E 84th Ave Address Line 2:Suite C10 City:Thornton State:CO Zip:80229 Email lmichel@tepgroup.net Phone:3035669929 Page 1097 of 4908 9/6/22, 1:30 PM Tower Engineering Professionals Mail - another from Stevies email https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=4a95b507f6&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1742590430029029014&simpl=msg-f%3A17425904300…1/3 Logan Michel <lmichel@tepgroup.net> another from Stevies email 1 message Ryan Malek <rmalek@tepgroup.net> To: Logan Michel <lmichel@tepgroup.net> DiGruttolo, Laura <Laura.DiGruttolo@myfwc.com> to Josh, Cori, me, Conservation Dear Mr. Pearlman: Based on geographic information system (GIS) data, the following table includes listed and managed species have the potential to occur in Collier County. Publicly availa Biodiversity Matrix Map Server (https://www.fnai.org/biointro.cfm), provide access to rare species occurrence information statewide. Additional resources include the FW maps/gtmapping/gtpermitmap.html), the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) system (https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/), and FWC at https://geodata.myfwc.com/pages/upland. Requests for further information can be sent to ConservationPlanningServices@MyFWC.com. Thank you for contacting the FWC. Sincerely, Laura DiGruttolo Biological Administrator II Office of Conservation Planning Services Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission 620 S. Meridian Street, MS 5B5 Tallahassee, FL 32399-1600 (850) 728-5147 Federally Listed and Managed Species Common Name Scientific Name Listing Status Everglade snail kite Rostrhamus sociabilis plumbeus FE Bachman’s wood warbler Vermivora bachmanii FE Smalltooth sawfish Pristis pectinatata FE Florida manatee Trichechus manatus FE Green sea turtle Chelonia mydas FE Leatherback sea turtle Dermochelys coriacea FE Kemp’s ridley sea turtle Lepidochelys kempii FE Hawksbill sea turtle Eretmochelys imbricata FE Page 1098 of 4908 9/6/22, 1:30 PM Tower Engineering Professionals Mail - another from Stevies email https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=4a95b507f6&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1742590430029029014&simpl=msg-f%3A17425904300…2/3 Red-cockaded woodpecker Picoides borealis FE Florida panther Puma concolor coryi FE Florida bonneted bat Eumops floridanus FE Loggerhead sea turtle Caretta caretta FT Florida scrub-jay Aphelocoma coerulescens FT Audubon’s crested caracara Polyborus plancus audubonii FT Florida grasshopper sparrow Ammodramus savannarum floridanus FT Eastern black rail Laterallus jamaicensis jamaicensis FT Rufa red knot Calidris canutus rufa FT Piping plover Charadrius melodus FT Wood stork Mycteria americana FT Eastern indigo snake Drymarchon corais couperi FT Bald eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus State-listed and Managed Species Common Name Scientific Name Listing Status Gopher tortoise Gopherus polyphemus ST Big Cypress fox squirrel Sciurus niger avicennia ST Everglades mink Neovison vison evergladensis ST Sherman’s short-tailed shrew Blarina shermani ST Southeastern American kestrel Falco sparverius paulus ST Florida sandhill crane Antigone canadensis pratensis ST Florida burrowing owl Athene cunicularia floridana ST White-crowned pigeon Patagioenas leucocephala ST Little blue heron Egretta caerulea ST Tricolored heron Egretta tricolor ST Roseate spoonbill Platalea ajaja ST Reddish egret Egretta rufescens ST Black skimmer Rynchops niger ST Least tern Sternula antillarum ST Snowy plover Charadrius nivosus ST Page 1099 of 4908 9/6/22, 1:30 PM Tower Engineering Professionals Mail - another from Stevies email https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=4a95b507f6&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1742590430029029014&simpl=msg-f%3A17425904300…3/3 American oystercatcher Haematopus palliates ST Florida black bear Ursus americanus floridanus Listing Status Key: FE = Federally Endangered, FT = Federally Threatened, and ST = State Threatened Thanks, _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Ryan A. Malek Environmental Division Manager | Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. (www.tepgroup.net) 326 Tryon Road|Raleigh, NC 27603-3530|Office: (919) 661-6351 Ext. 5325|Fax: (919) 661-6350|Mobile: (919) 332-1917 Page 1100 of 4908 500 E 84th Avenue, Ste. C10, Thornton, CO 80229 O) 303.590.5496 lmichel@tepgroup.net July 29, 2022 1339 20th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960-3559 Re: Request for comments regarding the construction of a proposed 180-ft AGL overall (184-ft AGL overall w/ appurtenances) Self-Support Communications Tower 31st Ave. NE Naples, FL 34120 Site Name: Palmetto Ridge 2 (US-FL-5283) To Whom It May Concern, Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. has been contracted by Bridger Tower Corporation to provide environmental services for the aforementioned proposed telecommunications facility. TEP personnel’s investigation of the site has determined that the site will have no effect on federally listed and proposed threatened and endangered species and their listed/proposed critical habitats. Concurrence from the Service for “no effect” determinations is not required under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act; however, we are submitting the following information for your review and comments regarding impacts to protected species for the purpose of completing an FCC NEPA Environmental Compliance Checklist for the following telecommunications tower. The intent of the checklist is to establish the basis for a Categorical Exclusion for the proposed tower. If we do not receive any comments within 30 days, we will proceed on the basis that there are no objections to the project. Correspondence was also sent to the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) with regards to impacts to state protected species. The characteristics of the site and the vicinity are described as follows: Palmetto Ridge 2 Site Location and Specifics: The proposed communications tower facility is located north of a portion of 31st Ave NE, east of a portion of Everglades Boulevard N, northeast of the City of Naples, in Collier County, Florida. The proposed lease area will be located on the south-central portion of an approximately 5.15-acre parcel identified as Parcel ID 40171120002 by the Collier County, FL Tax Assessors Office. A proposed 20-ft wide access and utility easement will proceed generally north from 31st Ave. NE for approximately 100- ft. before reaching the proposed approximately 10,000-sq.ft. tower compound construction area, as well as a 20-ft wide access and utility easement that will proceed generally east from a portion of Everglades Blvd. N. for approximately 350-ft then proceed south for approximately 100-ft until reaching the proposed tower compound facility. These areas are herein referred to as the proposed action area and total approximately 21,000-sq.ft. (~0.48-acres). The proposed action area is located in a portion of Collier County, FL primarily occupied by low-density residential land uses. At the time of inspection on June 21, 2022, the proposed action area was primarily occupied by an unmaintained grassland with sparse shrubs. The site inspection consisted of a pedestrian inspection of the proposed action area and those areas located within the proposed project’s vicinity for indications of preferred habitat and occurrences of listed species, as described by the USFWS species profiles. According to the USGS 7.5-Minute Corkscrew SE, Page 1101 of 4908 500 E 84th Avenue, Ste. C10, Thornton, CO 80229 O) 303.590.5496 lmichel@tepgroup.net FL Topographic Quadrangle, the nearest surface water feature is a freshwater emergent wetland located approximately 760-ft. east of the proposed tower centerline. The approximate coordinates of the tower location are as follows: Latitude: N 26° 17’ 22.00” (NAD 83) Longitude: W 81° 32’ 38.24” (NAD 83) Action Area Description and Effects: The proposed action area is anticipated to include the proposed 20-ft wide x ~100-ft long access and utility easement, the proposed 20-ft wide x ~450 long access and utility easement, as well as the approximately 2,500-sq.ft. tower compound lease area within a proposed 10,000-sq-ft. construction area. According to the USDA Web Soil Survey of Collier County, FL, soil within the proposed lease area is identified as Immokalee fine sand-Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes. Immokalee fine-sand- Urban land complex is described as poorly drained, found on flatwoods on marine terraces, and formed from sandy marine deposits. A typical profile for Immokalee fine sand-Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes consists of fine sand from 0 to 80-inches below ground surface (BGS). According to the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) online mapper, the closest surface water feature is described as a freshwater emergent wetland and is located approximately 760-ft. east of the proposed tower centerline. The Official Species List for the project (Project Code: 2022-0067150) dated July 25, 2021 indicated the possible presence of seven (7) federally endangered terrestrial species: Florida bonneted bat (Eumops floridanus), Florida panther (Puma concolor coryi), Everglade snail kite (Rostrhamus sociabilis plumbeus), Bartram's hairstreak butterfly (Strymon acis bartrami), Florida leafwing butterfly (Anaea troglodyta floridalis), Miami blue butterfly (Cyclargus thomasi bethunebakeri), and Florida prairie-clover (Dalea carthagenensis floridana); one (1) federally listed threatened terrestrial species due to similarity of appearance: puma (Puma concolor: all subsp. except coryi); one (1) federally listed threatened aquatic species due to similarity of appearance: American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis); four (4) threatened terrestrial species: Audubon's crested caracara (Polyborus plancus audubonii), wood stork (Mycteria americana), Eastern black rail (Laterallus jamaicensis jamaicensis), and Eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon couperi); three (3) federally threatened aquatic species: loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta), gulf sturgeon (Acipenser oxyrinchus desotoi), and green sea turtle (Chelonia mydas); and one (1) federal candidate species: monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus). No officially designated critical habitats were identified on or in the vicinity of the proposed action area. The site inspection performed on June 21, 2022 consisted of a pedestrian inspection of the proposed action area and immediate vicinity for indications of the presence of federally listed species and/or their critical habitats and preferred/suitable habitats, as described by the USFWS. At the time of the June 21, 2022 site inspection, the proposed action area was observed to be an unmaintained grassland with sparse shrubs. Therefore, given the previous disturbances observed and the lack of suitable habitat present at the time of the site inspection, it is the opinion of TEP that the proposed action will have no effect on federally endangered and threatened species. Page 1102 of 4908 500 E 84th Avenue, Ste. C10, Thornton, CO 80229 O) 303.590.5496 lmichel@tepgroup.net Summary of effects on federally listed endangered terrestrial species Florida bonneted bat (Eumops floridanus): According to the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC), the Florida bonneted bat roosts colonially. Roost sites are poorly understood for this species, but have included buildings and other man-made structures and tree cavities. Based on the habitat description, it appears no suitable roosting habitat exists within the vicinity of the proposed action area. Therefore, it is the opinion of TEP that the proposed undertaking will have no effect on the Florida bonneted bat. Florida panther (Puma concolor coryi): According to the FWC, the Florida panther occurs in peninsular Florida primarily south of Orlando. They use all habitat types to some degree but rely upon forested areas that provide dense understory vegetation for rest sites, den sites, and stalking cover. Based on the habitat description, it appears no suitable habitat exists within the vicinity of the proposed action area. Therefore, it is the opinion of TEP that the proposed undertaking will have no effect on the Florida panther. Everglade snail kite (Rostrhamus sociabilis plumbeus): According to the FWC, Everglade snail kites inhabit shallow freshwater marshes and shallow grassy shorelines of lakes. They can primarily be found in the Kissimmee Valley, St. Johns River headwaters, Lake Okeechobee, Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge, Water Conservation Areas 2A, 2B, 3A, 3B, in Broward, Palm Beach and Dade counties; and sections of Big Cypress National Preserve and Everglades National Park. Due to the habitat description and proximity of the proposed tower compound to freshwater marshes and shallow grassy shorelines of lakes, is the opinion of TEP that the proposed undertaking will have no effect on Everglade snail kite. Bartram's hairstreak butterfly (Strymon acis bartrami): According to the National Park Service (NPS), the Bartram's scrub-hairstreak once occurred in pine rockland habitat throughout Miami-Dade and Monroe counties. Over time, their populations have declined throughout their historic range for various reasons. This species can still be found in a few pine rockland fragments in Miami-Dade County and on Big Pine Key in the lower Florida Keys. Based on the habitat description and lack of pine rockland fragments within the vicinity of the APE, it is the opinion of TEP that the proposed undertaking will have no effect on Bartram’s hairstreak butterfly. Florida leafwing butterfly (Anaea troglodyta floridalis): According to the NPS, the Florida leafwing is native to the pine rockland habitat of south Florida. However, similar to the Everglade snail kite, their historic population range has declined and their distribution is now extremely limited. This species has not been seen outside of Everglades NP since 2007—scientists now believe that Everglades NP is the only place in the world where the Florida leafwing is found. Based on habitat descriptions and presumed species distribution, it is the opinion of TEP that the proposed undertaking will have no effect on Florida leafwing butterfly. Miami blue butterfly (Cyclargus thomasi bethunebakeri): According to the FWC, the Miami blue butterfly inhabits tropial hardwood hammocks, tropical pine rocklands, and beachside scrub in Florida. This species was presumed to have disappeared from the mainland by the 1980s, but was rediscovered in Key West National Wildlife Refugre in 2006. Based on habitat descriptions and presumed species distribution, it is the opinion of TEP that the proposed undertaking will have no effect on Miami blue butterfly. Page 1103 of 4908 500 E 84th Avenue, Ste. C10, Thornton, CO 80229 O) 303.590.5496 lmichel@tepgroup.net Florida Prairie-clover (Dalea carthagenensis floridana): According to the Floristic Inventory of South Florida, this species occurs in pine rocklands, edges of rockland hammocks, coastal uplands, and marl prairie. Based on the habitat description, it appears no suitable habitat exists within or in the vicinity of the proposed action area. Therefore, it is the opinion of TEP that the proposed undertaking will have no effect on the Florida prairie-clover. Summary of effects on federally listed threatened terrestrial species due to similarity of appearance Puma (Puma concolor: all subsp. except coryi): According to the U.S. Forest Service, in North America substantial mountain lion populations occur only in the western United States and Canada, and these ranges have been reduced from pre-settlement times. Isolated populations and incidental sightings have been reported in the central and eastern United States. At present the only known mountain lion population east of Texas exists in southern Florida, although a small population may exist in western Arkansas and eastern Oklahoma. Based on habitat descriptions and presumed species distribution, it is the opinion of TEP that the proposed undertaking will have no effect on the Puma (Puma concolor: all subsp. except coryi). Summary of effects on federally listed threatened aquatic species due to similarity of appearance: American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis): According to the National Wildlife Federation, American alligators can be found in the coastal wetlands of the U.S. Southeast, as far north as North Carolina and as far west as eastern Texas. Their range extends down to southern Florida and includes the Everglades. These reptiles are usually found in slow-moving freshwater rivers, but also inhabit swamps, marshes, and lakes. Based on the habitat description and lack of aquatic habitats within the vicinity of the APE, it is the opinion of TEP that the proposed undertaking will have no effect on American alligator. Summary of effects on federally listed threatened terrestrial species Audubon's crested caracara (Polyborus plancus audubonii): According to the FWC, the crested caracara inhabits wet prairies with cabbage palms. It may also be found in wooded areas with saw palmetto, cypress, scrub oaks and pastures. This species is found throughout south-central Florida and also occurs in Texas, Arkansas, Mexico, Cuba, and Panama. Based on the habitat description, it appears no suitable habitat exists within or in the vicinity of the proposed action area. Therefore, it is the opinion of TEP that the proposed undertaking will have no effect on Audubon’s crested caracara, Wood stork (Mycteria americana): According to Audubon, this species is typically found in cypress swamps (nesting colonies), marshes, ponds, and lagoons. They typically forage in fre sh water, including shallow marshes, flooded farm fields, ponds, and ditches. They typically nest in stands of tall cypress and sometimes in mangroves and dead trees in flooded impoundments. Based on the habitat description, it appears no suitable habitat exists within or in the vicinity of the proposed action area. Therefore, it is the opinion of TEP that the proposed undertaking will have no effect on the wood stork. Eastern black rail (Laterallus jamaicensis jamaicensis): According to Audubon, this species is typically found in tidal marshes and salicornia on the coast and grassy marshes further inland. The Eastern black rail favors very shallow water, or damp soil with scattered puddles. In the coastal marsh, this species prefers upper limits of the highest tides; inland, mostly wet meadows. Eastern black rail is typically found in dense stands of spartina and other grasses, salicornia, rushes, and sedges. Based on the habitat description, it appears no suitable habitat exists within or in the vicinity of the proposed action area. Page 1104 of 4908 500 E 84th Avenue, Ste. C10, Thornton, CO 80229 O) 303.590.5496 lmichel@tepgroup.net Therefore, it is the opinion of TEP that the proposed undertaking will have no effect on the Eastern black rail. Eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon couperi): According to the FWC, this species inhabits pine flatwoods, hardwood forests, moist hammocks, and areas that surround cypress swamps. They can be found throughout Peninsular Florida and southeastern Georgia. Based on the habitat description, it appears no suitable habitat exists within or in the vicinity of the proposed action area. Therefore, it is the opinion of TEP that the proposed undertaking will have no effect on the Eastern indigo snake. Summary of effects on federally listed threatened aquatic species: Loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta): According to the Texas Department of Parks and Wildlife (TPWD), Loggerheads are capable of living in a variety of environments, such as in brackish waters of coastal lagoons, river mouths, and tropical and temperate waters above 50 degrees Fahrenheit. Based on the habitat description and lack of aquatic habitats within the vicinity of the APE, it is the opinion of TEP that the proposed undertaking will have no effect on loggerhead sea turtle. Gulf sturgeon (Acipenser oxyrinchus desotoi): According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association (NOAA), this species currently spans from Lake Pontchartrain and the Pearl River system in Louisiana and Mississippi respectively, east to the Suwannee River in Florida. Based on the habitat description and lack of aquatic habitats within the vicinity of the APE, it is the opinion of TEP that the proposed undertaking will have no effect on gulf sturgeon. Green sea turtle (Chelonia mydas): According to the NOAA, this species is found worldwide primarily in subtropical and temperate regions of the Atlantic, Pacific, and Indian Oceans, and in the Mediterranean Sea. Based on the habitat description and lack of aquatic habitats within the vicinity of the APE, it is the opinion of TEP that the proposed undertaking will have no effect on green sea turtle. Minimizing Impacts to Migratory Birds protected under the MBTA: The following siting and construction details were implemented in an attempt to comply with the recommendations of the Memorandum of Understanding, directed by the President of the U.S. under the Executive Order 13186, for minimizing impacts to migratory birds protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the USFWS Interim Guidelines for Recommendations on Communications Tower Siting, Construction, Operation, and Decommissioning. The proposed tower is less than 200-ft AGL and will not utilize guy wires, minimizing the impacts to migratory birds. The tower will also not be located in a wetland or in an area with high incidence of fog (e.g., forested area, mountaintop, ridgeline, coastline) where migratory birds are typically found. Additionally, with regards to the Bald Eagle & Golden Eagle Protection Act, no active or abandoned nests were observed in the vicinity of the proposed action area at the time of inspection. Page 1105 of 4908 500 E 84th Avenue, Ste. C10, Thornton, CO 80229 O) 303.590.5496 lmichel@tepgroup.net We have enclosed a portion of the pertinent USGS 7.5-Minute Corkscrew SE, FL Topographic Quadrangle, site plans, and site photographs. We request any comments you may have regarding the proposed action’s potential effect on federal and state protected species for the purpose of completing an FCC NEPA compliance checklist for the proposed tower. Please provide any comments within 30 days of receipt of this letter. Correspondence has also been sent to the FWC. If there are any questions or if further information is needed for the processing of this request, please don’t hesitate to call. Thank you for your cooperation and your assistance. Sincerely, Logan Michel Western U.S. Environmental Manager Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. Page 1106 of 4908 500 E 84th Avenue,Ste. C10,Thornton, CO 80229 O) 303.566.9914 lmichel@tepgroup.net July 29, 2022 Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission –South Regional Office 8535 Northlake Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33412 Re:Request for comments regarding the construction of a proposed 180-ft AGL overall (184- ft AGL overall w/ appurtenances)Self-Support Communications Tower 31st Ave. NE Naples, FL 34120 Site Name:Palmetto Ridge 2 (US-FL-5283) To Whom It May Concern, Tower Engineering Professionals,Inc. has been contracted by Bridger Tower Corporation to provide environmental services for the aforementioned proposed telecommunications facility. TEP personnel’s investigation of the site has determined that the site will have no effect on federally listed or state listed and proposed threatened and endangered species and their listed/proposed critical habitats.Concurrence from the Service for “no effect” determinations is not required under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act; however, we are submitting the following information for your review and comments regarding impacts to protected species for the purpose of completing an FCC NEPA Environmental Compliance Checklist for the following telecommunications tower. The intent of the checklist is to establish the basis for a Categorical Exclusion for the proposed tower.If we do not receive any comments within 30 days, we will proceed on the basis that there are no objections to the project. Correspondence was also sent to United States Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS)with regards to impacts to federally protected species. The characteristics of the site and the vicinity are described as follows: Palmetto Ridge 2 Site Location and Specifics: The proposed communications tower facility is located north of a portion of 31st Ave NE, east of a portion of Everglades Boulevard N, northeast of the City of Naples, in Collier County, Florida. The proposed lease area will be located on the south-central portion of an approximately 5.15- acre parcel identified as Parcel ID 40171120002 by the Collier County, FL Tax Assessors Office. The proposed 20-ft wide access and utility easement (option #1)will proceed generally north from 31st Ave. NE for approximately 160-ft. before reaching the approximately 10,000-sq.ft. proposed tower compound construction area.These areas are herein referred to as the proposed action area and total approximately 11,200-sq.ft.(~0.258-acres). The proposed tower site is primarily occupied by cleared/agricultural.The proposed action area is located in a portion of Collier County,FL primarily occupied by low-density residential land uses.At the time of inspection on June 21, 2022,the proposed action area was primarily occupied by undeveloped/agricultural land.The site inspection consisted of a pedestrian inspection of the Page 1107 of 4908 500 E 84th Avenue,Ste. C10,Thornton, CO 80229 O) 303.566.9914 lmichel@tepgroup.net proposed action area and those areas located within the proposed project’s vicinity for indications of preferred habitat and occurrences of listed species, as described by the USFWS species profiles.According to the USGS 7.5-Minute Corkscrew SE, FL Topographic Quadrangle, the nearest surface water feature is a freshwater emergent wetland located approximately 760-ft. east of the proposed tower centerline. The approximate coordinates of the tower location are as follows: Latitude:N 26°17’21.52”(NAD 83) Longitude:W 81°32’39.23” (NAD 83) Action Area Description and Effects: The proposed action area is anticipated to include the proposed 20-ft wide x ~116-ft long access and utility easement (secondary option:20-ft wide x ~400-ft and 20-ft wide x ~120-ft)and an approximately 2,500-sq.ft. tower compound lease area within a proposed 10,000-sq-ft. construction area.According to the USDA Web Soil Survey of Collier County, FL, soil within the proposed lease area is identified as Immokalee fine sand-Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes.Immokalee fine-sand-Urban land complex is described as poorly drained, found on flatwoods on marine terraces, and formed from sandy marine deposits. A typical profile for Immokalee fine sand-Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes consists of fine sand from 0 to 80-inches below ground surface (BGS). The Official Species List for the project (Project Code: 2022-0067150) dated July 25, 2022 indicated the possible presence of seven (7) federally endangered terrestrial species:Florida bonneted bat (Eumops floridanus),Florida panther (Puma concolor coryi),Everglade snail kite (Rostrhamus sociabilis plumbeus),Bartram's hairstreak butterfly (Strymon acis bartrami),Florida leafwing butterfly (Anaea troglodyta floridalis),Miami blue butterfly (Cyclargus thomasi bethunebakeri),Florida prairie-clover (Dalea carthagenensis floridana);one (1)federally listed threatened terrestrial species due to similarity of appearance:puma (Puma concolor: all subsp. except coryi); one (1) federally listed threatened aquatic species due to similarity of appearance: American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis);two (2) threatened terrestrial species:Audubon's crested caracara (Polyborus plancus audubonii)and wood stork (Mycteria americana);and two (2) federally threatened aquatic species:loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta) and Atlantic Sturgeon (gulf Subspecies)(Acipenser oxyrhynchus).No officially designated critical habitats were identified on or in the vicinity of the proposed action area. The site inspection performed on June 21, 2022 consisted of a pedestrian inspection of the proposed action area and immediate vicinity for indications of the presence of federally listed species and/or their critical habitats and preferred/suitable habitats, as described by the USFWS.At the time of the June 21,2022 site inspection, the proposed action area was observed to have been previously disturbed by cleared/agricultural operations. Therefore, given the previous disturbances observed and the lack of suitable habitat present at the time of the site inspection, it is the opinion of TEP that the proposed action will have no effect on federally endangered and threatened species. Page 1108 of 4908 500 E 84th Avenue,Ste. C10,Thornton, CO 80229 O) 303.566.9914 lmichel@tepgroup.net Summary of effects on federally listed endangered terrestrial species Florida bonneted bat (Eumops floridanus):According to the FWC, the Florida bonneted bat roosts colonially. Roost sites are poorly understood for this species, but have included buildings and other man-made structures and tree cavities. Based on the habitat description, it appears no suitable roosting habitat exists within the vicinity of the proposed action area. Therefore,it is the opinion of TEP that the proposed undertaking will have no effect on the Florida bonneted bat. Florida panther (Puma concolor coryi): According to the FWC, the Florida panther occurs in peninsular Floriday primarily south of Orlando. They use all habitat types to some degree but rely upon forested areas that provide dense understory vegetation for rest sites, den sites, and stalking cover.Based on the habitat description, it appears no suitable roosting habitat exists within the vicinity of the proposed action area. Therefore,it is the opinion of TEP that the proposed undertaking will have no effect on the Florida panther. Everglade snail kite (Rostrhamus sociabilis plumbeus): According to the FWC, Everglade snail kites inhabit shallow freshwater marshes and shallow grassy shorelines of lakes. They can primarily be found in the Kissimmee Valley, St. Johns River headwaters, Lake Okeechobee, Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge, Water Conservation Areas 2A, 2B, 3A, 3B, in Broward, Palm Beach and Dade counties; and sections of Big Cypress National Preserve and Everglades National Park.Due to the habitat description and proximity of the proposed tower compound to freshwater marshes and shallow grassy shorelines of lakes, is the opinion of TEP that the proposed undertaking will have no effect on Everglade snail kite. Bartram's hairstreak butterfly (Strymon acis bartrami): According to the National Park Service (NPS), the Bartram's scrub-hairstreak once occurred in pine rockland habitat throughout Miami- Dade and Monroe counties. Over time,their populations have declined throughout their historic range for various reasons. This species can still be found in a few pine rockland fragments in Miami-Dade County and on Big Pine Key in the lower Florida Keys. Based on the habitat description and lack of pine rockland fragments within the vicinity of the APE, it is the opinion of TEP that the proposed undertaking will have no effect on Bartram’s hairstreak butterfly. Florida leafwing butterfly (Anaea troglodyta floridalis): According to the NPS, the Florida leafwing is native to the pine rockland habitat of south Florida. However, similar to the Everglade snail kite, their historic population range has declined and their distribution is now extremely limited. This species has not been seen outside of Everglades NP since 2007—scientists now believe that Everglades NP is the only place in the world where the Florida leafwing is found. Based on habitat descriptions and presumed species distribution,it is the opinion of TEP that the proposed undertaking will have no effect on Florida leafwing butterfly. Miami blue butterfly (Cyclargus thomasi bethunebakeri): According to the FWC, the Miami blue butterfly inhabits tropial hardwood hammocks, tropical pine rocklands, and beachside scrub in Florida. This species was presumed to have disappeared from the mainland by the 1980s, but was rediscovered in Key West National Wildlife Refugre in 2006.Based on habitat descriptions and Page 1109 of 4908 500 E 84th Avenue,Ste. C10,Thornton, CO 80229 O) 303.566.9914 lmichel@tepgroup.net presumed species distribution,it is the opinion of TEP that the proposed undertaking will have no effect on Miami blue butterfly. Florida Prairie-clover (Dalea carthagenensis floridana): According to the Lady Bird Johnosn Wildflower Center of the University of Texas at Austin, this species occurs in pine rocklands, edges of rockland hammocks, coastal uplands,and marl prairie.Based on the habitat description, it appears no suitable habitat exists within or in the vicinity of the proposed action area. Therefore,it is the opinion of TEP that the proposed undertaking will have no effect on the Florida prairie-clover. Summary of effects on federally listed threatened terrestrial species due to similarity of appearance Puma (Puma concolor: all subsp.except coryi): According to the U.S. Forest Service, in North America substantial mountain lion populations occur only in the western United States and Canada, and these ranges have been reduced from pre-settlement times.Isolated populations and incidental sightings have been reported in the central and eastern United States.At present the only known mountain lion population east of Texas exists in southern Florida,although a small population may exist in western Arkansas and eastern Oklahoma.Based on habitat descriptions and presumed species distribution,it is the opinion of TEP that the proposed undertaking will have no effect on the Puma (Puma concolor: all subsp.except coryi). Summary of effects on federally listed threatened aquatic species due to similarity of appearance: American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis): According to the National Wildlife Federation, American alligators can be found in the coastal wetlands of the U.S. Southeast, as far north as North Carolina and as far west as eastern Texas. Their range extends down to southern Florida and includes the Everglades. These reptiles are usually found in slow-moving freshwater rivers, but also inhabit swamps, marshes, and lakes.Based on the habitat description and lack of aquatic habitats within the vicinity of the APE, it is the opinion of TEP that the proposed undertaking will have no effect on American alligator. Summary of effects on federally listed threatened terrestrial species Audubon's crested caracara (Polyborus plancus audubonii): According to the FWC, the crested caracara inhabits wet prairies with cabbage palms. It may also be found in wooded areas with saw palmetto, cypress, scrub oaks and pastures. This species is found throughout south-central Florida and also occurs in Texas, Arkansas,Mexico, Cuba, and Panama.Based on the habitat description, it appears no suitable habitat exists within or in the vicinity of the proposed action area. Therefore,it is the opinion of TEP that the proposed undertaking will have no effect on Audubon’s crested caracara, Wood stork (Mycteria americana): According to Audubon, this species is typically found in cypress swamps (nesting colonies), marshes, ponds, and lagoons. They typically forage in fresh water, including shallow marshes,flooded farm fields, ponds,and ditches.They typically nest in stands of tall cypress and sometimes in mangroves and dead trees in flooded impoundments. Page 1110 of 4908 500 E 84th Avenue,Ste. C10,Thornton, CO 80229 O) 303.566.9914 lmichel@tepgroup.net Based on the habitat description,it appears no suitable habitat exists within or in the vicinity of the proposed action area. Therefore,it is the opinion of TEP that the proposed undertaking will have no effect on the wood stork. Summary of effects on federally listed threatened aquatic species: Loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta):According to the Texas Department of Parks and Wildlife (TPWD),Loggerheads are capable of living in a variety of environments, such as in brackish waters of coastal lagoons, river mouths, and tropical and temperate waters above 50 degrees Fahrenheit.Based on the habitat description and lack of aquatic habitats within the vicinity of the APE, it is the opinion of TEP that the proposed undertaking will have no effect on loggerhead sea turtle. Atlantic Sturgeon (gulf Subspecies)(Acipenser oxyrhynchus): According to the Florida Museum, gulf sturgeons have a limited habitat,living in the Gulf of Mexico most of the time, and then swimming up rivers to spawn.Based on the habitat description and lack of aquatic habitats within the vicinity of the APE,it is the opinion of TEP that the proposed undertaking will have no effect on gulf sturgeon. Minimizing Impacts to Migratory Birds protected under the MBTA: The following siting and construction details were implemented in an attempt to comply with the recommendations of the Memorandum of Understanding, directed by the President of the U.S. under the Executive Order 13186, for minimizing impacts to migratory birds protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the USFWS Interim Guidelines for Recommendations on Communications Tower Siting, Construction,Operation, and Decommissioning.The proposed tower is less than 200-ft AGL and will not utilize guy wires, minimizing the impacts to migratory birds.The tower will also not be located in a wetland or in an area with high incidence of fog (e.g.,forested area, mountaintop, ridgeline, coastline).Additionally, with regards to the Bald Eagle & Golden Eagle Protection Act,no active or abandoned nests were observed in the vicinity of the proposed action area at the time of inspection. We have enclosed a portion of the pertinent USGS 7.5-Minute Corkscrew SE, FL Topographic Quadrangle, site plans, and site photographs.We request any comments you may have regarding the proposed action’s potential effect on federal and state protected species for the purpose of completing an FCC NEPA compliance checklist for the proposed tower.Please provide any comments within 30 days of receipt of this letter. Correspondence has also been sent to the U.S.Fish &Wildlife Service’s Florida Ecological Field Services Office. If there are any questions or if further information is needed for the processing of this request, please don’t hesitate to call. Thank you for your cooperation and your assistance. Sincerely, Page 1111 of 4908 500 E 84th Avenue,Ste. C10,Thornton, CO 80229 O) 303.566.9914 lmichel@tepgroup.net Logan Michel Western U.S.Environmental Manager Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. Page 1112 of 4908 ATTACHMENT 4 SECTION 106 – SHPO Page 1113 of 4908 RON DESANTIS Governor CORD BYRD Secretary of State Division of Historical Resources R.A. Gray Building • 500 South Bronough Street• Tallahassee, Florida 32399 850.245.6300 • 850.245.6436 (Fax) • FLHeritage.com Corissa Wittholt August 4, 2022 326 Tryon Road, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27603 tcns@tepgroup.net (919) 661-6351 RE: DHR Project File No.: 202204855, Received by DHR: July 21st, 2022 Project: Palmetto Ridge 2, NE 31st Avenue, Naples, Florida, 34120. County: Collier To Whom It May Concern, Thank you for your transmittal regarding the above referenced project. The Florida State Historic Preservation Officer reviewed the referenced project for possible effects on historic properties listed, or eligible for listing, in the National Register of Historic Places. The review was conducted in accordance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, and its implementing regulations in 36 CFR Part 800: Protection of Historic Properties. Based on the information provided, it is the opinion of this office that the proposed project will have NO EFFECT on historic properties listed, or eligible for listing, in the NRHP. If you have any questions, please contact Dr. Kyra Lucas, Historic Preservationist II, by email at kyra.lucas@dos.myflorida.com, or by telephone at 850.245.6339. Sincerely, Alissa Lotane Director, Division of Historical Resources & State Historic Preservation Officer Page 1114 of 4908 Florida Master Site File / Div. of Historical Resources / R.A. Gray Bldg / 500 S Bronough St., Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0250 HR6E066R0319, effective 05/2016 Rule 1A-46.001, F.A.C. Phone 850.245.6440, Fax 850.245.6439, Email: SiteFile@dos.myflorida.com Page 1 Ent D (FMSF only) __________ Survey Log Sheet Survey # (FMSF only) ___________ Florida Master Site File Version 5.0 3/19 Consult Guide to the Survey Log Sheet for detailed instructions. Manuscript Information Survey Project (name and project phase) Report Title (exactly as on title page) Report Authors (as on title page) 1._______________________________ 3. _____________________________ 2._______________________________ 4. _____________________________ Publication Year __________ Number of Pages in Report (do not include site forms) ___________ Publication Information (Give series, number in series, publisher and city. For article or chapter, cite page numbers. Use the style of American Antiquity.) Supervisors of Fieldwork (even if same as author) Names _____________________________________________________ Affiliation of Fieldworkers: Organization _____________________________________ City ______________________ Key Words/Phrases (Don’t use county name, or common words like archaeology, structure, survey, architecture, etc.) 1.___________________ 3.___________________ 5. ___________________ 7.____________________ 2.___________________ 4.___________________ 6. ___________________ 8.____________________ Survey Sponsors (corporation, government unit, organization, or person funding fieldwork) Name. ____________________________________ Organization. ______________________________________ Address/Phone/E-mail. __________________________________________________________________________ Recorder of Log Sheet _________________________________________ Date Log Sheet Completed ___________ Is this survey or project a continuation of a previous project? q No q Yes: Previous survey #s (FMSF only) _______________ Project Area Mapping Counties (select every county in which field survey was done; attach additional sheet if necessary) 1.___________________________ 3. ____________________________ 5. ___________________________ 2.___________________________ 4. ____________________________ 6. ___________________________ USGS 1:24,000 Map Names/Year of Latest Revision (attach additional sheet if necessary) 1.Name ____________________________ Year_____4.Name _____________________________ Year_____ 2.Name ____________________________ Year_____5.Name _____________________________ Year_____ 3.Name ____________________________ Year_____6.Name _____________________________ Year_____ Field Dates and Project Area Description Fieldwork Dates: Start __________ End __________ Total Area Surveyed (fill in one) ________hectares ________acres Number of Distinct Tracts or Areas Surveyed _________ If Corridor (fill in one for each) Width: _______meters _______feet Length: _______kilometers _______miles Page 1115 of 4908 Florida Master Site File / Div. of Historical Resources / R.A. Gray Bldg / 500 S Bronough St., Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0250 HR6E066R0718, effective 05/2016 Rule 1A-46.001, F.A.C. Phone 850.245.6440, Fax 850.245.6439, Email: SiteFile@dos.myflorida.com Page 2 Survey Log Sheet Survey #__________ Research and Field Methods Types of Survey (select all that apply): archaeological architectural historical/archival underwater damage assessment monitoring report other(describe):. _________________________ Scope/Intensity/Procedures Preliminary Methods (select as many as apply to the project as a whole) q Florida Archives (Gray Building)q library research- local public q local property or tax records q other historic maps q Florida Photo Archives (Gray Building) q library-special collection q newspaper files q soils maps or dataq Site File property search q Public Lands Survey (maps at DEP) q literature search q windshield surveyq Site File survey search q local informant(s)q Sanborn Insurance maps q aerial photography q other (describe):. ______________________________________________________________________________ Archaeological Methods (select as many as apply to the project as a whole) q Check here if NO archaeological methods were used.q surface collection, controlled q shovel test-other screen sizeq surface collection, uncontrolled q water screenq shovel test-1/4”screen q posthole testsq shovel test-1/8” screen q auger testsq shovel test 1/16”screen q coringq shovel test-unscreened q test excavation (at least 1x2 m) q block excavation (at least 2x2 m) q soil resistivityq magnetometerq side scan sonarq ground penetrating radar (GPR)q LIDAR q other (describe):. _______________________________________________________________________________ Historical/Architectural Methods (select as many as apply to the project as a whole) q Check here if NO historical/architectural methods were used.q building permits q demolition permits q neighbor interview q subdivision mapsq commercial permits q occupant interview q tax recordsq interior documentation q windshield surveyq local property records q occupation permits q unknown q other (describe):. _______________________________________________________________________________ Survey Results Resource Significance Evaluated? q Yes q No Count of Previously Recorded Resources____________ Count of Newly Recorded Resources____________ List Previously Recorded Site ID#s with Site File Forms Completed (attach additional pages if necessary) List Newly Recorded Site ID#s (attach additional pages if necessary) Site Forms Used: q Site File Paper Forms q Site File PDF Forms REQUIRED: Attach Map of Survey or Project Area Boundary SHPO USE ONLY SHPO USE ONLY SHPO USE ONLY Origin of Report: 872 Public Lands UW 1A32 # Academic Contract Avocational Grant Project # Compliance Review: CRAT # Type of Document: Archaeological Survey Historical/Architectural Survey Marine Survey Cell Tower CRAS Monitoring Report Overview Excavation Report Multi-Site Excavation Report Structure Detailed Report Library, Hist. or Archival Doc MPS MRA TG Other: Document Destination: ______________________________ Plotability: ___________________________________________ LIDAR other remote sensing pedestrian survey unknown metal detector other remote sensing Desktop Analysis Page 1116 of 4908 Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. 326 Tryon Road Raleigh, North Carolina 27603 (919) 661-6351 Fax (919) 661-6350 July 11, 2022 Florida Division of Historical Resources R.A. Gray Building 500 South Bronough Street Tallahassee, Florida 32399 Subject: Proposed 180-ft (184-ft with appurtenances) AGL self-support communications tower Bridger Tower Corporation Site: Palmetto Ridge 2 (US-FL-5283) FCC TCNS #250040, Date Filed: 6/3/2022 31st Ave NE Naples, FL 61420 (Collier County) To Whom it May Concern, Attached herein is the FCC 620 Review Packet for the proposed Bridger Tower Corporation site identified as Palmetto Ridge 2 (US-FL-5283). Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. (TEP) is submitting the FCC Form 620 to the Florida Division of Historical Resources utilizing standard mail in order to satisfy the requirements of Section 106 Review of the National Historic Preservation Act for the proposed tower site. Bridger Tower Corporation proposes the construction of a 180-ft (184-ft with appurtenances) AGL self-support communications tower facility to be located at 31st Ave NE, northeast of the City of Naples, in Collier County, Florida. The proposed self-support tower is located on Collier County Parcel ID 40171120002 by the Collier County Tax Assessor Office. It is the opinion of TEP that the proposed action will have no effect on historic properties, and we request your concurrence with our findings. Please provide all correspondence to TEP at the address stated below or via email to tcns@tepgroup.net. Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. Attn: Corissa Wittholt 326 Tryon Road Raleigh, NC 27603-3530 Sincerely, Corissa Wittholt , MA, RPA Cultural Resources Project Archaeologist Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. Page 1117 of 4908 Page 1118 of 4908 Page 1119 of 4908 Page 1120 of 4908 Page 1121 of 4908 Page 1122 of 4908 Page 1123 of 4908 Page 1124 of 4908 Page 1125 of 4908 Page 1126 of 4908 Page 1127 of 4908 Page 1128 of 4908 Page 1129 of 4908 Page 1130 of 4908 Page 1131 of 4908 Page 1132 of 4908 NT SUBMISSION PACKET – FCC FORM 620 Attachments Attachment 1. Résumés/Vitae See attached resumes Secretary of the Interior Qualified archaeologist Corissa Wittholt, and William Turner, Secretary of the Interior Qualified Archaeologist and Architectural Historian. Attachment 2. Additional Site Information Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. (TEP) is assisting Bridger Tower Corporation with the construction of a proposed 180- ft (184-ft overall with appurtenances) AGL self-support communications tower, a proposed 100-ft x 100-ft tower compound lease area containing a 50-ft x 50-ft fenced tower compound and a proposed gravel vehicle turnaround area, a proposed 20-ft x ~100-ft access & utility easement, and a proposed 20-ft x ~450-ft access & utility easement. These areas are herein referred to the direct area of potential effect (APE) total approximately 21,000-ft² (~0.48-acres). The project area is generally flat. The proposed action area is located on a property which is occupied primarily by agricultural land. The site is located in a portion of Collier County where the majority of the surrounding area is occupied by low-density residential, forested, agricultural, and swamp land. Attachment 3. Tribal and NHO Involvement Tower Engineering Professionals filed the proposed facility with the FCC – Tower Construction Notification System (TCNS) on 6/3/2022 and was assigned TCNS #250040. In addition, TEP personnel sent correspondence to all the applicable tribes on 7/11/2022. Attachment 4. Local Government Involvement TEP contacted the Collier County Planning Department and the City of Naples Planning Department on July 11, 2022 and invited them to be consulting parties regarding the proposed tower site. Attachment 5. Public Notice TEP placed a Public Notice in the “Naples Daily News” newspaper that was advertised on June 16, 2022. Attachment 6. Local Historical Societies TEP contacted the Naples Historical Society and the Florida Historical Society on July 11, 2022 requesting any comments they may have regarding the proposed undertaking within 30 days of receipt of the correspondence. Attachment 7. Analyses of the APEs a. The geographic area, scale and nature of the undertaking and subsequent effects of the proposed project were analyzed to determine the APE for direct effects. The area of potential disturbance associated with the proposed tower compound and access & utility easements, is anticipated to total approximately 21,000-ft² (~0.48-acres). See attached Site Plan. b. The geographic area, scale, and nature of the undertaking and subsequent effects of the proposed project were analyzed to determine the APE for visual effects. Further, required background research and suggested standards in the FCC NEPA were reviewed to determine the APE for visual effects for the proposed project. The FCC designated APE for visual effects for towers below 200-ft is a 0.50-mile radius from the proposed tower centerline. The determined APE for visual effects is currently primarily occupied by low-density residential, forested, agricultural, and swamp land. Page 1133 of 4908 Attachment 8. Historic Properties Identified in the APE for Visual Effects a. No (0) historic properties eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) was identified within the determined FCC 0.50-mile APE for visual effects. b. As of 7/11/2022, TEP has not been made aware of any properties identified by comment in the determined APE for visual effects. c. No (0) listed or eligible properties that are no longer eligible were identified in the determined APE for visual effects during the research completed on the Florida Master File Search. Attachment 9. Historic Properties Identified in the APE for Direct Effects a. No (0) property listed on or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places was located within the APE for direct effects. b. N/A c. TEP performed an archaeological investigation of the proposed tower compound and access & utility easements on June 22, 2022. No (0) cultural materials or features were identified in the direct APE. The report has been included for your review. Attachment 10. Effects on Identified Properties a. No Effect – No historic properties were identified in the visual or direct APEs. b. None c. N/A Attachment 11. Photographs a. See attached site photographs and attached Cultural Resources Report completed by TEP. b. N/A c. N/A d. See attached aerial photograph Attachment 12. Maps a. See attached b. See attached c. See attached d. See attached Page 1134 of 4908 US-FL-5283 PALMETTO RIDGE 2 TOWER SITE COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT REPORT 6/22/2022 Signature of Principal Investigator Date Prepared by: Corissa Wittholt, MA, RPA Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. 326 Tryon Road Raleigh, NC 27603-3530 919-661-6351 cwittholt@tepgroup.net Prepared for: Bridger Tower Corporation 1951 East 400th Road LeCompton, KS 6605 (785 -764-6682) Lead Agency: FCC TCNS #250040 June 22, 2022 Page 1135 of 4908 Final Report Table of Contents MANAGEMENT SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................... iii INTRODUCTION TO THE PROJECT ................................................................................................................. 1 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ........................................................................................................................... 6 Florida Master Site File Search Results/Previous Research .................................................................... 11 Florida Cultural Background ................................................................................................................... 11 FIELD METHODS/SURVEY RESULTS ............................................................................................................. 17 Evaluation of Direct Effects ..................................................................................................................... 17 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................................................................................... 20 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................................................ 21 Page 1136 of 4908 MANAGEMENT SUMMARY Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. (TEP) is assisting Bridger Tower Corporation with the construction of a proposed 180-ft AGL (184-ft AGL overall with appurtenances) self-support communications tower. The proposed tower will be located at 31st Ave NE, northeast of the City of Naples, in Collier County, Florida. This project is located on Collier County Parcel ID #40171120002. Installation of the tower and telecommunication facility is regulated by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). TEP conducted a cultural resources assessment of the project’s direct and visual effects to meet the requirements of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Nationwide Programmatic Agreement (NPA) of October 4, 2004. This letter report summarizes the results of TEP’s cultural resource assessment. The assessment resulted in the identification of no (0) historic properties within the visual Area of Potential Effect (APE). An archaeological investigation was conducted on June 22, 2022. No (0) cultural resources were discovered within the Direct APE. No avoidance or further work is recommended for the proposed project. Page 1137 of 4908 US-FL-5283 Palmetto Ridge 2 Tower Cultural Resources Assessment Report Page | 1 INTRODUCTION TO THE PROJECT Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. (TEP) is assisting Bridger Tower Corporation with the construction of a proposed 180-ft AGL (184-ft AGL overall with appurtenances) self-support communications tower. The proposed tower will be located at 31st Ave NE, northeast of the City of Naples, in Collier County, Florida. This project is located on Collier County Parcel ID #40171120002. Installation of the tower and telecommunication facility is regulated by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) (Figures 1-2). The proposed undertaking (Figure 3-4) consists of the aforementioned tower that will be located within a 50-ft x 50-ft fenced tower compound within a 100-ft x 100-ft tower compound lease area and will be accessed by a two (2) proposed 20-ft wide access & utility easements. The southern proposed 20-ft wide access & utility easement will proceed north from a portion of 31th Avenue NE for approximately 100-ft before reaching the 100-ft x 100-ft lease area and will contain a 12- ft wide gravel access drive. The northern proposed access and utility easement will proceed east from Everglades Blvd N for approximately360-ft before turning to proceed south for approximately 90-ft before reaching the 100-ft x 100-ft lease area. These areas are herein referred to as the direct area of potential effect (APE) and total approximately 21,000-ft² (~ 0.8-acres). On June 21, 2022, William Turner, an SOI Qualified Archaeologist, requested a search of the Florida Master Site File to determine if any historic properties are located within a 0.50-mi radius. No (0) historic properties were identified within the visual or direct APE. An archaeological assessment of the project’s direct effects was conducted on June 22, 2022 by SOI Qualified Archaeologist Corissa Wittholt, to meet the requirements of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Nationwide Programmatic Agreement (NPA) of October 4, 2004. This document is being submitted in compliance with the Federal Communications Nationwide Programmatic Agreement for Review of Effects on Historic Properties for Certain Undertakings Approved by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC 2004). Also pursuant to the Nationwide PA (FCC 2004), the APE for visual effects is the geographic area in which the undertaking has the potential to introduce visual elements that diminish or alter the setting, including the landscape, where the setting is a character-defined feature of a historic property that makes it eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places (National Register). For towers under 200-ft tall, the FCC designated visual APE is a 0.50-mile radius from the proposed tower centerline. No (0) historic properties were identified within the 0.50-mi search radius/visual APE. No (0) previously recorded cultural resources were identified within the APE for direct effects. Page 1138 of 4908 US-FL-5283 Palmetto Ridge 2 Tower Cultural Resources Assessment Report Page | 2 Figure 1: Project Location (Corkscrew SE, FL USGS 7.5-Minute Topographic Quadrangle). Page 1139 of 4908 US-FL-5283 Palmetto Ridge 2 Tower Cultural Resources Assessment Report Page | 3 Figure 2: Aerial Photograph. Page 1140 of 4908 US-FL-5283 Palmetto Ridge 2 Tower Cultural Resources Assessment Report Page | 4 Figure 3: Overall Site Plan Page 1141 of 4908 US-FL-5283 Palmetto Ridge 2 Tower Cultural Resources Assessment Report Page | 5 Figure 4. Compound Detail Page 1142 of 4908 US-FL-5283 Palmetto Ridge 2 Tower Cultural Resources Assessment Report Page | 6 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING According to the U.S. EPA Level III and IV Ecoregions Map, the proposed project is located within the Southwestern Florida Flatwoods (75b) ecoregion of the Southern Coastal Plain (75) region of Florida. The Southwestern Flatwoods include barrier islands, Gulf coastal flatlands, and gently sloping coastal plain terraces at higher elevations. The elevations range from sea level to 150 feet. Much of the pine flatwoods and wet and dry grassland prairies have been converted to extensive areas of pasture, rangeland, and young citrus groves. Coastal areas are rapidly urbanizing. Lakes in this region range from slightly acidic to alkaline, but almost all are eutrophic and have dark colored water. Some lakes at the higher elevations near the upland ridges have more moderate levels of nutrients and color, similar to the Lake Wales Ridge Transition region (Griffith et.al. 2002). The South Atlantic Coastal Plain (75) ecoregion encompasses more than 23 million acres across three states, including the southern portion of South Carolina, southeastern Georgia and northeastern Florida. The ecoregion is bordered to the east by the Atlantic Ocean, and to the northwest by the Fall Line (a geologically distinct zone corresponding to the interface between the relatively flat coastal plain and the topographically varied Piedmont). It is bordered on the northeast by the Mid-Atlantic Coastal Plain, on the west by the East Gulf Coastal Plain, on the south by the Florida Peninsula and on the north by the Piedmont. Though changes in topography may be slight, the South Atlantic Coastal Plain is extremely rich in both species’ diversity and ecological community diversity. The many ecological systems found in the South Atlantic Coastal Plain ecoregion range from fall-line sandhills to rolling longleaf pine uplands to wet pine flatwoods; from small streams to large river systems to rich estuaries; from isolated depression wetlands to Carolina bays to the Okefenokee Swamp. Other ecological systems in the ecoregion include maritime forests on barrier islands, pitcher plant seepage bogs and Altamaha grit (sandstone) outcrops (Griffith et.al. 2002). The proposed project area is located on agricultural land (Figures 5- 12). The project area is generally flat. The parent property is surrounded by low-density residential, sparsely forested, agricultural, and swamp land. The closest water source is an unnamed manmade pond approximately 0.21-mi northwest of the proposed project area. According to the USDA Web Soil Survey of Collier County, FL, soil within the proposed lease area is identified as Immokalee fine sand-Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes, (Table 1). Immokalee fine-sand-Urban land complex is described as poorly drained, found on flatwoods on marine terraces, and formed from sandy marine deposits. A typical profile for Immokalee fine sand- Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes consists of fine sand from 0 to 80-inches. Table 1: Project Area Soil Soil Name Code Slope Drainage Location Immokalee fine sand-Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes 117 0-2% Poorly drained flatwoods on marine terraces Page 1143 of 4908 US-FL-5283 Palmetto Ridge 2 Tower Cultural Resources Assessment Report Page | 7 Figure 5: View north towards proposed tower centerline. Figure 6: View east towards proposed tower centerline. Page 1144 of 4908 US-FL-5283 Palmetto Ridge 2 Tower Cultural Resources Assessment Report Page | 8 Figure 7: View south towards proposed tower centerline. Figure 8: View west towards proposed tower centerline. Page 1145 of 4908 US-FL-5283 Palmetto Ridge 2 Tower Cultural Resources Assessment Report Page | 9 Figure 9: View south along the southern proposed access & utility easement. Figure 10: View North along the northern proposed access & utility easement. Page 1146 of 4908 US-FL-5283 Palmetto Ridge 2 Tower Cultural Resources Assessment Report Page | 10 Figure 11: View northwest along the northern proposed access & utility easement. Figure 12: View north along the northern proposed access & utility easement. Page 1147 of 4908 US-FL-5283 Palmetto Ridge 2 Tower Cultural Resources Assessment Report Page | 11 ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND CULTURAL BACKGROUND Florida Master Site File Search Results/Previous Research On June 21, 2022 William Turner, SOI Qualified Archaeologist, requested a search of the Florida Master Site File to determine if any historic properties are located within a 0.50-mi radius. No (0) historic properties were identified within the visual effects APE (Figure 13). No (0) eligible or listed historic properties were identified within the direct APE. Figure 13: Previously Recorded Cultural Resources (Florida Master Site File) Florida Cultural Background The region’s prehistory is divided into seven cultural periods: Paleoindian, Archaic, Pseudo- Woodland, Mississippian, First Spanish Period, British Period, and the Second Spanish Period. The prehistoric cultural chronology of Florida was developed based on the excavation and stratified archaeological sites and was first compiled by Ripley P. Bullen and his wife Adelaide Kendall Bullen (1952). Later archaeological studies, including John Goggin and Charles H. Fairbanks. The prehistory of Florida spans a period of at least 12,000 years, during which time native (Indian) cultures developed, flourished, and changed. Their technologies also changed, as is readily evident in the varieties of such items as arrowheads (projectile points) and pottery (Murphree, 2012). Paleoindian Period – 12,000+ to 9,500 BCE Page 1148 of 4908 US-FL-5283 Palmetto Ridge 2 Tower Cultural Resources Assessment Report Page | 12 Indigenous people entered what is the present-day state of Florida sometime between 11,000 and 13,000 years ago. They were representative of the Paleoindian cultural phase, nomadic hunters traveling in small bands of mostly related families. Like other American Indians, they are thought to descend from nomadic hunters who crossed the Bering Land Bridge perhaps as early as 35,000 years ago. These hunters are presumed to have followed caribou herds into the Americans, trudging on after prey animals and never knowing that they were entering two joined continents devoid of human habitation. Over thousands of years the descendants of these first immigrants fanned out across both continents, eventually exploiting virtually every econiche presented, often in quite marginal environments (Murphree, 2012) The Florida peninsula at that time was much larger, with shores extending perhaps as much as another 50-miles into the Atlantic Ocean and the Gulf of Mexico. The importance of this cannot be overestimated. When considering the possibility of human habitation before the accepted date, there is little in the way of artifact evidence. The possibility of habitable land later flooded by rising ocean waters after 13,000 CE means that evidence of human settlement earlier than that date cannot be dismissed, although it might be inaccessible (Murphree, 2012). Archaic Period 9,500 BCE – 4,000 BCE This shift to a more labor-intensive daily hunt for food necessitated some social changes as well. Over time, fertile fishing grounds attracted semi-permanent settlements, as did reliable freshwater sources. In fact, the rise of sea levels at the end of the last ice age led to the phenomenon of sinkholes turning into wellsprings for new lakes and rivers. With freshwater in more abundance, ecosystems changed, and more animal diversity attracted some shore dwellers to explore settlement in the interior of the state. By about 5,000 years ago, aboriginal Floridians were exploiting every econiche, fanning out across the region. While natural increase boosted their populations, they still retained sparse settlement patterns, not overtaxing an area’s carrying capacity (the number of people and animals that a given environment can tolerate without losing species of plants of animals). They were learning to strike a balance with nature as it existed in Florida (Murphree, 2012) Pseudo-Woodland Period (1000 BCE – 1000 C.E) Also, about 5,000 years ago, Florida’s now-indigenous people began to intervene in the life cycles of native plants, increasing supplies by scaring off animals they competed with for the vegetation. Although full-scale cultivation was only feasible in some parts of the state, when it developed it tended towards the farming of maize (corn), with much smaller-scale agriculture based upon legumes and cucurbits. By about 1,000 years ago, the harvests of maize in the north were so large that storage buildings had to be constructed. Trade networks developed by which produce was traded for fish and other meats, linking the farmers and the fishers throughout the state (Murphree, 2012). The transitional period between the Woodland period and Mississippian periods in Florida have been a longstanding interest for Southeastern archaeologists. This is particularly true on Florida’s west-central Gulf Coast. The Weeden Island (8PI1), a Woodland era cultural center, and Safety Harbor (8PI2), a Mississippian cultural complex, are linking chronologically but the transition Page 1149 of 4908 US-FL-5283 Palmetto Ridge 2 Tower Cultural Resources Assessment Report Page | 13 remains obscure. The Bayshore Homes (8PI41) site complex temporally spans the period between the Middle Woodland era and the Early Mississippian era. Originally, Bayshore Homes consisted of a large, flat-topped, pyramid shaped mound with a ramp and two smaller mounds surrounded by a horseshoe shaped midden paralleling the shore. The earliest occupation of Bayshore Homes site is dated between A.D. 1450 and 565 and is associated with the Woodland period Manasota culture (Austin and Mitchem 2014). Mississippian Period Although Florida never supported villages or towns as large and highly populated as the riverside urban centers at Spiro, Cahokia, Moundville, and Ocmulgee, the role of religion was present in the peninsula as well. The first of the three definitive traits of the Southeastern Ceremonial Complex (SCC) found in Florida were ceremonial mounds. Archaeological excavations have uncovered evidence of the building of temple mounds, artificially elevated domes of earth reserved for the abode of the settlement’s leader, a kind of chief priest whose duties probably included civic as well as ceremonial tasks. They would have been advised by select elders from the village who would have helped him maintain intervillage trade. In large towns the chief and his council would have also managed the deployment of warriors in times of conflict and the collection of tribute state (Murphree, 2012). The second hallmark trait of southeastern indigenous cultures was (and is) the use of a ceremonial “Black Drink” in the same ways that other SCC peoples did. Ilex vomitoria, a drink made from Yaupon Holly, served as a purgative, causing vomiting, diarrhea, and excessive urination. Since the drink rapidly depleted the body of potassium, it could induce hallucinations and other physical and mental symptoms translated as religious experience by believers. It was also used to purify both body and spirit for some rites of passage and to prepare for war state (Murphree, 2012). Third, and the reason for the alternate names for the SCC, was the importance attached to death, the dead, and proper funerary customs. Burial mounds were present in some Florida sites when excavated professionally, however, treasure hunters and farmers have significantly reduced the state’s archaeological patrimony. What can be gleaned is that Florida’s indigenous people in the late Mississippian phase attached similar ceremony to preparation of the dead and burial as did their more northern counterparts (Murphree, 2012). Some Mississippian-era sites, such as the River Styx site (8AL458) and Lake Jackson (8LE1) are indicative of funerary customs within Florida. The River Styx site, in north-central Florida, was a Middle Woodland ceremonial center that consisted of a low sand burial mound surrounded by a 100-m-long horseshoe-shaped earthen embankment. The site ostensibly marks the beginning of year-round inhabitation of the region and the establishment of centralized villages. These first permutant inhabitants seem to have been the founders of the distinctive Cades Pond archaeological culture, which thrived among the extensive wetland environments of north-central Florida until the 7th century (Wallis, Cordell, and Stoltman 2014). Lake Jackson (8LE1) is located near Tallahassee, Florida and has long been considered to be a frontier Mississippian center. This assertion is primarily based on elaborate burial goods recovered during salvage excavating in the 1970s. lake Jackson has seven mounds, several of which have Page 1150 of 4908 US-FL-5283 Palmetto Ridge 2 Tower Cultural Resources Assessment Report Page | 14 been damaged over the years by modern earthmoving and looting. The association of the site with a wider Mississippian interaction network is primarily based off artifacts recovered from salvage excavations of Mound 3. Lake Jackson likely arose concurrently with the development of Fort Walton pottery tradition in northern Florida and southern Georgia. The population of Lake Jackson were likely influenced by interregional interactions with other groups participating in Mississippian practices. The Fort Walton period (A.D. 1000-1600) featured the return of sites with large-scale monumental architecture. Lake Jackson and other Fort Walton mound centers were abandoned by approximately A.D. 1450. Historical accounts from the early sixteenth century Spanish incursions do not mention mound sites. Rather, they describe Apalachee villages consisting of small, scattered households surrounded by trees and large cultivated fields. This pattern is mirrored in the archaeological record (Seinfield, Bigman, Stauffer, and Nowak 2015). First Spanish Period On April 2, 1513, Spanish explorer Juan Ponce de Leon’s crew first sighted land on the Atlantic shore of northern Florida. They had left Puerto Rico with three ships. There were three large Native cultures in Florida at the time: the Timucua in northeast and central Florida, the Apalachee in the Big Bend area, and the Calusa in South Florida. The Timucuas of 1513 were farmers of the sea and literal maize farmers. They traded for foodstuffs among their villages, ensuring a balanced and varied diet. They wore little clothing, in keeping with the hot humid climate, and adorned themselves with elaborate tattoos and jewelry made from shells (Murphree, 2012). The Spanish next discovered the Tequesta Indians, their settlements located near the southern half of present-day Miami on the Biscayne Bay. With a marine hunter-gatherer culture still in place in the early 1500s, the Tequestas had not grown to as large a population or as complex a social structure as the inland Calusas. The Tequesta were at first guardedly friendly toward the Spanish explorers, the Tequestas would suffer the same diseases-related population decline as other Florida natives (Murphree, 2012). Ponce de Leon’s expedition ventured on to the land of the Calusas. The Calusa reputation for ferocity was well known by the conquistadores before they ventured west. The reputation was also well deserved. These indigenous southwest and west-central peninsular Indians were the descendants of the Caloosahatchee culture. Population estimates range from 20,000 to more than 50,000 at the time of contact. Adapted to a marine environment, they were hunter-gatherers who relied heavily on the sea. Most of their utensils and weapons were fashioned from shell, wood, or stone. Calusa resistance shortened the conquistadores’ first planned sojourn, and Ponce de Leon forces fell back to familiar island territory. The Calusa would eventually fall to disease-related population decline (Murphree, 2012). The Apalachee Indians were organized into a stratified society, or a chiefdom. Occupying the richest agricultural zone in Florida, the north-central region, the Apalachees prospered in large- scale farming. When both Narvaez and de Soto came to the Apalachee homelands, they were met with constant attacks. The sustained exposure to infectious disease, enslavement, and brutal warfare that de Soto’s forces brought to the Florida Indians accelerated the loss of population started with Ponce de Leon (Murphree, 2012). Page 1151 of 4908 US-FL-5283 Palmetto Ridge 2 Tower Cultural Resources Assessment Report Page | 15 Indian Rebellion of 1656 In 1656 the Timucuas made their last stand, rebelling and attempting to turn back the Spanish. It was far too late for that, as they soon came to realize. The rebellion put the Spanish on alert, and with the continuing worry over the English and possible French encroachment, San Augustinians demanded more permanent protection than was afforded by the wooden fort that had been burned down numerous times. In 1672, African runaways and Timucua slaves began construction on the coquina fort, Castillo de San Marcos. In 1702, British forces allied with Creek Confederacy member tribes began a thrust into Florida to burn the Spanish missions. Within two years the missions trail was in ruins, and the Spanish mission system in Florida died with it. So-called Mission Indians had long been forced into affiliation with these missions. To a large extent Spain abandoned Florida at that point. A formal handover of control would have to wait for six more decades (Murphree, 2012). British Period Much of the British period in Florida was rife with the anticipation of rebellion from the colonies. The British saw the Florida Indians as little threat in the early 18th century, being far more concerned about the free blacks. However, it was refuge among the Indians that had first brought these former slaves to La Florida, and the Indians continued to be an integrating force in helping the runaways to acclimate. With relatively few indigenous Floridan’s left, this integrating function was increasingly more often performed by the dissident Creeks, themselves refugees from the Creek Confederacy. The Spanish had refereed to them as cimarrones, a term meaning “something wild” in the sense of something fully a part of nature. In their Muscogean language, the approximation of this was Siminoli, or Seminole (Murphree, 2012). Siminolis The enigma of the Seminoles is that they are not a genetically indigenous people, but they are culturally indigenous. That is to say, what became a unique Seminole culture developed in Florida, even if the people of that culture are descendants of tribes from father north. To the west in the north-central part of the state, a group of refugee Indians from the colony of Georgia was settling on a grassy flatland near present-day Gainesville. These were the people of the Alachia savanna, a band of early Seminole headed by Ahaya, or Cowkeeper. They had left Georgia as the Oconees, a name that locates their ancestral homeland near present-day Milledgeville. The Oconees lived first along there that Ahaya grew to adulthood, becoming a headman in his mid-20s (Murphree, 2012). Second Spanish Period In 1783, Britain returned Florida to Spain. Although the Spanish were again in control of Florida, they were left with a difficult gift to maintain. American victory over Britain had dropped Florida back into Spanish control but the Spanish had no economic or administrative grounds to control the newly returned colony (Murphree, 2012). First Seminole War 1816-1818 Page 1152 of 4908 US-FL-5283 Palmetto Ridge 2 Tower Cultural Resources Assessment Report Page | 16 The internal conflict that had been sending refugee Creeks into Florida for decades came to a head as a result of the War of 1812. Factions had developed in the Creek Confederacy that were known as the White Sticks and the Red Sticks. White Sticks were in favor of peace with the Americans, less out of true feelings of friendliness than out of abject fear. The Red Sticks were in favor of war against the Americans, really a continuation of the War of 1812. Civil war erupted among the Creeks in the Red Stick War (Creek Civil War) in 1813. There was actually a third faction among the Creeks, perhaps best described as the No Sticks. They were Native Americans who neither wanted to fight the Americans nor acculturate to their ways; they chose self-imposed exile. It was this final wave of refugee Creeks that cemented the future of the Seminoles and Micosukees in Florida. Andrew Jackson was in charge of American forces in the Red Stick War and contained that role during the First Seminole War. The incursion was given cause to punish the Seminoles for harboring runaways and actually gave Jackson the opportunity to force the hand of President Madison (Murphree, 2012). Second Seminole War 1835-1842 Guerrilla warfare was the Seminoles forte, and they would wage it for the next seven years across the peninsula and parts of the panhandle. American troops were at a distinct disadvantage. The Second Seminole War would become the costliest to date and would only be later eclipsed by the Vietnam War. In the midst of the Second Seminole War a people hunted fled from one thicket to another, from one swamp to another. Throughout 1839-1842 Seminoles and federal troops skirmished, but it had become increasingly clear that there would be no definite victor. The revolving door of command in Florida had now opened for Colonel Willian Jenkins Worth. His troops drove the Seminoles who remained north of Lake Okeechobee to the south, consolidating them in the Everglades. By the end of summer of 1842, hostilities had ceased informally, and Congress passed an act to permit white settlement of the southern peninsula. Millions or dollars had been spent, thousands of lives had been lost, and an untold amount of property had been destroyed. Somewhere around 500 Seminoles were thought to be left in Florida, and the cost per person for the removal of the others to Indian Territory had been immense. Florida no longer beckoned to runaways as aa safe haven. Statehood came to Florida in 1845, and Florida quietly assimilated into the other slave states of the South (Murphree, 2012). Collier County At the time of Spanish contact in the 16th century, southwest Florida, including Collier County, was the domain of the Calusa, a complex, sedentary, ranked society. It was ruled by a paramount chief, whose political alliances extended throughout much of southern and eastern Florida. The Calusa were the most important group in south Florida in terms of population size, political importance, and influence on neighboring tribes. They controlled the coast from Charlotte Harbor south at least to the Ten Thousand Islands, but their influence extended throughout south Florida in the form of relations of politics, marriage, and exchange. The paramount chief lived in the capital town of Calos, believed to be near present day Fort Myers Beach. The Calusa chose a sedentary lifestyle, which led to rapid population growth. They were thought to have based their sedentary existence on highly productive fishing, not on horticulture (Marquardt 1986). Page 1153 of 4908 US-FL-5283 Palmetto Ridge 2 Tower Cultural Resources Assessment Report Page | 17 The proposed tower site is approximately 8-mi northwest from the Big Cypress Swamp National Preserve. This preserve is rich in history. Humans have made the Big Cypress Swamp their home for almost 3,000 years. Within the wetland region of South Florida, people known as the “Glades People” were living on the margins of the Big Cypress Swamp. They supplemented their economy with food and other products from the swamp and coastal waters. Shell tools and weapons, along with simple and sometimes decorated pottery have been found on many of the naturally elevated “islands” in the swamp. There is no evidence of agriculture. Game, including white-tailed deer, marsh rabbits, and all kinds of fish and reptiles were plentiful. Evidence from prehistoric trash middens suggests both fish and reptiles made up the largest part of the Glades diet (Schwadron 2000). FIELD METHODS/SURVEY RESULTS Evaluation of Direct Effects On June 22 Corissa Wittholt, of TEP, who meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for archaeology, conducted a Phase I survey of the APE for direct effects, spending four and half hours in the field. A total of eighteen (18) shovel tests were conducted in the project area (Figure 17). A pedestrian inspection was conducted within the project area. Thirteen (13) shovel tests were conducted within the two proposed access and utility easements. Five (5) shovel tests were excavated within the proposed tower compound lease area. Excavated shovel tests measured approximately 50-cm x 50-cm and were excavated only ~60cm down due to inundation. Soils were screened through ¼” hardwire mesh. Soils were consistent throughout the project area (Figure 14). Subsoil was not reached, therefore all shovel tests were terminated at approximately 60 cm below surface. A summary of the shovel testing data is located in Appendix A. All shovel tests showed signed at inundation at 60 cm (~2- ft). Shovel testing was stopped when water was reached as per archaeological standards. This could indicate a possible wetland. Two trenches were observed in the direct APE. The trenches were possibly constructed as a flood control measure. No significant artifacts, features, or other signs of historic or prehistoric cultural activities were observed during the pedestrian inspection and subsurface testing. Page 1154 of 4908 US-FL-5283 Palmetto Ridge 2 Tower Cultural Resources Assessment Report Page | 18 Figure 14: Typical soil profile (STP #1). Figure 15: Trench observed within a portion of the northern access & utility easement. Page 1155 of 4908 US-FL-5283 Palmetto Ridge 2 Tower Cultural Resources Assessment Report Page | 19 Figure 16: Trench observed south of the 50’ x 50’ fenced compound. Figure 17: Shovel Test Plan Page 1156 of 4908 US-FL-5283 Palmetto Ridge 2 Tower Cultural Resources Assessment Report Page | 20 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS On June 22, 2022, TEP conducted a cultural resources investigation in accordance with Section 106 of the proposed a proposed 180-ft AGL (184-ft AGL overall with appurtenances) self-support communications tower. The proposed tower will be located at 31st Ave NE, northeast of the City of Naples, in Collier County, Florida. This project is located on Collier County Parcel ID #40171120002. It is the opinion of TEP that there are no historic properties in the project APE. However, Inundation was found at 60 cm (2-ft) in all shovel test pits tested. This could indicate a possible wetland. If the boundary or location of the proposed tower site change, additional archaeological investigations may be necessary, as determined in consultation with the SHPO per the FCC Nationwide Programmatic Agreement. All field notes and documentation will be stored at the Raleigh office of Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. In the event of an unanticipated find, including human remains, according to Chapter 872.05, Florida Statutes, all activity that may disturb the unmarked human burial shall cease immediately, and the district medical examiner shall be notified. Chapter 872, Florida Statutes, decrees that all human burials and human skeletal remains be accorded equal treatment and respect based upon common human dignity without reference to ethnic origin, cultural background or religious affiliation. Principal Investigator/SOI Qualified Archaeologist Corissa Wittholt, MA RPA Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. 326 Tryon Road Raleigh, NC 27603 Page 1157 of 4908 US-FL-5283 Palmetto Ridge 2 Tower Cultural Resources Assessment Report Page | 21 REFERENCES Austin, Robert & Jeffrey M. Mitchem 2014 “CHRONOLOGY, SITE FORMATION, AND THE WOODLAND-MISSISSIPPIAN TRANSITION AT BAYSHORE HOMES, FLORIDA” Southeastern Archaeology, 33:1, 68-86. Fisher, Keith 2001 Hernandez Trail: Site Number BR1766. Carl Survey of St. Sebastian River SBP. Florida Bureau of Archaeological Research. Griffith, G.E., Omernik, J.M., Comstock, J.A., Schafale, M.P., McNab, W.H., Lenat, D.R., MacPherson, T.F., Glover, J.B., and Shelburne, V.B. 2002 Ecoregions of Florida (color poster with map, descriptive text, summary tables, and photographs): Reston, Virginia, U.S. Geological Survey (map scale 1:1,500,000). Marquardt, William H. 1986 The Development of Cultural complexity in Southwest Florida: Elements of a Critique. In Southeastern Archaeology, Vol. 5, No. 1 (Summer 1986), pp. 63-70. Taylor & Francis, Ltd. On behalf of the Southeastern Archaeological Conference. Murphree, Daniel and Cynthia R. Kasee 2012 Native America: A State-by-State Historical Encyclopedia, edited by Daniel S. Murphree, ABC-CLIO, LLC, 2012. ProQuest Ebook Central, http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ugalib/detail.action?docID=871455. Natural Resources Conservation Services (NRCS) 2020 Collier County Soil Survey. http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/ Accessed June 20, 2022. Neill J. Wallis, Ann S. Cordell & James B. Stoltman 2014 “FOUNDATIONS OF THE CADES POND CULTURE IN NORTH-CENTRAL FLORIDA: THE RIVER STYX SITE (8AL458)” Southeastern Archaeology, 33:2, 168- 188 O’Sullivan, Becky 2014 Site Seeing: Paleoindians at the Harney Flats Site. Florida Public Archaeology Network West Central. <http://www.flpublicarchaeology.org/blog/wcrc/2014/03/12/site-seeing- paleoindians-at-the-harney-flats-site/>. Accessed June, 20, 2022. Schwadron, Margo. 2000 Precolumbian People of Big Cypress. Big Cypress National Preserve Archaeological Assessment. National Park Service. Page 1158 of 4908 US-FL-5283 Palmetto Ridge 2 Tower Cultural Resources Assessment Report Page | 22 Appendix A Shovel Test Results* STP# Area Depth (cmbs) Color Description Comments 1 Tower Center 0-50 50-65 5YR 6/1 Gray 5 YR 8/1White Fine sand Fine sand Negative Inundation at 60 cm 2 Northeast Corner of Lease Area 0-45 45-68 5YR 6/1 Gray 5 YR 8/1White Fine sand Fine sand Negative Inundation at 60 cm 3 Northwest Corner of Lease Area 0-43 43-65 5YR 6/1 Gray 5 YR 8/1White Fine sand Fine sand Negative Inundation at 60 cm 4 Southeast Corner of Lease Area 0-39 39-50 5YR 6/1 Gray 5 YR 8/1White Fine sand Fine sand Negative Inundation at 60 cm 5 Southwest Corner Of the Lease Area 0-30 30-67 5YR 6/1 Gray 5 YR 8/1White Fine sand Fine sand Negative Inundation at 60 cm 6 Access and Utility Easement - 1 0-50 50-62 5YR 6/1 Gray 5 YR 8/1White Fine sand Fine sand Negative Inundation at 60 cm 7 Access and Utility Easement -1 0-50 50-63 5YR 6/1 Gray 5 YR 8/1White Fine sand Fine sand Negative Inundation at 60 cm 8 Access and Utility Easement -2 0-48 48-62 5YR 6/1 Gray 5 YR 8/1White Fine sand Fine sand Negative Inundation at 60 cm 9 Access and Utility Easement- 2 0-50 50-63 5YR 6/1 Gray 5 YR 8/1White Fine sand Fine sand Negative Inundation at 60 cm 10 Access and Utility Easement- 2 0-43 43-65 5YR 6/1 Gray 5 YR 8/1White Fine sand Fine sand Negative Inundation at 60 cm 11 Access and Utility Easement -2 0-50 50-65 5YR 6/1 Gray 5 YR 8/1White Fine sand Fine sand Negative Inundation at 60 cm 12 Access and Utility Easement- 2 0-45 45-66 5YR 6/1 Gray 5 YR 8/1White Fine sand Fine sand Negative Inundation at 60 cm 13 Access and Utility Easement -2 0-50 50-65 5YR 6/1 Gray 5 YR 8/1White Fine sand Fine sand Negative Inundation at 60 cm 14 Access and Utility Easement -2 0-52 52-62 5YR 6/1 Gray 5 YR 8/1White Fine sand Fine sand Negative Inundation at 60 cm Page 1159 of 4908 US-FL-5283 Palmetto Ridge 2 Tower Cultural Resources Assessment Report Page | 23 15 Access and Utility Easement -2 0-48 48-65 5YR 6/1 Gray 5 YR 8/1White Fine sand Fine sand Negative Inundation at 60 cm 16 Access and Utility Easement -2 0-50 50-64 5YR 6/1 Gray 5 YR 8/1White Fine sand Fine sand Negative Inundation at 60 cm 17 Access and Utility Easement -2 0-50 50-63 5YR 6/1 Gray 5 YR 8/1White Fine sand Fine sand Negative Inundation at 60 cm 18 Access and Utility Easement -2 0-50 50-66 5YR 6/1 Gray 5 YR 8/1White Fine sand Fine sand Negative Inundation at 60 cm ** See Figure 17 for shovel test locations. All shovel tests measured approximately 50-cm x 50-cm Page 1160 of 4908 Corissa Wittholt, M.A., RPA Cultural Resources Project Archaeologist EDUCATION______________________________________________________________________ Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru Lima, Peru Degree: Master of Arts (2015) Major: Archaeology with specialty in Amer-Indian Osteoarchaeology and Funerary Studies Hendrix College Conway, AR Degree: Bachelor of Arts (2010) Major: History WORK_SUMMARY________________________________________________________________ Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. Charlotte, NC (March 2022 – present) -Cultural Resources Project Archaeologist Completed Section 106 Compliance Surveys, archaeology and visual assessments and reports for Federal Communication Commission projects throughout the U.S. Conducted background research Conducted artifact analysis and curation Authored cultural resources management reports Tribal and SHPO consultation for section 106 projects Conducted fieldwork in various states and territories Dynamic Environmental Associates, Remote (October 2021-Februrary 2022) - Senior Archaeologist/ Principal Investigator Complete Section 106 Compliance reports for Federal Communication Commission projects throughout the U.S. Architectural Historian review for Section 106 Completed background research Dealt directly with telecommunications clients Reviewed work of staff archaeologists and signed off on forms Terracon, Columbia, SC (February 2021-August 2021) -Staff Archaeologist/ Field Director Conduct artifact analysis and curation Author cultural resources management reports Field Director: Conduct fieldwork in various states and territories (Phases I-III) Telecommunications Fieldwork Rescom Environmental Corp, Little Rock, AR (January 2017-February 2021) - On-Call Project Archaeologist On-Call Project Archaeologist for AR, LA, MS, MO, TN Fieldwork for Phase I-II Authored Cultural Resource Reports Page 1161 of 4908 6/3/22, 1:28 PM Tower Construction Notification https://wireless2.fcc.gov/TribalHistoricNotification/asrConfirmation.htm 1/1 FCC Home | Search | Updates | E-Filing | Initiatives | For Consumers | Find People Tower Construction Notification FCC > WTB > Tower Construction Notification FCC Site Map Logged In: (Log Out) Section 106 Tower Construction Notification New Notification Notifications Home Your Notification has been successfully submitted to the FCC. The date for this Notification is 06/03/2022. Your Notification ID number is 250040. Please make a note of this Notification ID — print out this page for your records. A confirmation of this submitted notification will also be emailed to the email address specified in your notification. This system is intended to facilitate consultation under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act by providing early notification of proposed construction to Tribes and State Historic Preservation officers. This system is not to be used in place of Section 106 consultation, and use of this notification system in itself does not satisfy parties' obligations with respect to historic preservation review under the Commission's rules. Please note: the submission of this notification is NOT to be considered a submission for Antenna Structure Registration. Tower Structures that require antenna structure registration based on FCC Rules 47 C.F.R. Part 17 must complete FCC Form 854 after FAA clearance is obtained. ASR Help ASR License Glossary - FAQ - Online Help - Documentation - Technical Support ASR Online Systems TOWAIR- CORES/ASR Registration - ASR Online Filing - Application Search - Registration Search About ASR Privacy Statement - About ASR - ASR Home Federal Communications Commission 45 L Street NE Washington, DC 20554 More FCC Contact Information... Phone: 1-877-480-3201 TTY: 1-717-338-2824 Fax: 1-866-418-0232 Submit Help Request - Web Policies & Privacy Statement - Required Browser Plug-ins - Customer Service Standards - Freedom of Information Act Page 1162 of 4908 Page 1163 of 4908 Page 1164 of 4908 Page 1165 of 4908 Page 1166 of 4908 Page 1167 of 4908 326 Tryon Road, Raleigh, NC 27603-3530 O) (919) 661-6351 F) (919) 661-6350 tcns@tepgroup.net July 11, 2022 Subject: Proposed 180-ft (184-ft with appurtenances) AGL self-support communications tower Bridger Tower Corporation Site: Palmetto Ridge 2 (US-FL-5283) FCC TCNS #250040, Date Filed: 6/3/2022 31st Ave NE Naples, FL 61420 (Collier County) To Whom It May Concern: Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. has been contracted by Bridger Tower Corporation to complete a NEPA Checklist (FCC Compliance Audit) for the aforementioned proposed 180-ft (184-ft with appurtenances) AGL self-support communications tower. The proposed undertaking consists of the aforementioned tower which will be located within a proposed 100-ft x 100- ft tower compound lease area containing a 50-ft x 50-ft fenced tower compound and a proposed gravel vehicle turnaround area, a proposed 20-ft x ~100-ft access & utility easement, and a proposed 20-ft x ~450-ft access & utility easement. These areas are herein referred to the direct area of potential effect (APE) total approximately 21,000-ft² (~0.48-acres). The proposed project area is to be located at 31st Ave NE, northeast of the City of Naples, in Collier County, Florida. The proposed self-support tower is located on Collier County Parcel ID 40171120002 by the Collier County Tax Assessor Office. The proposed project area is located within agricultural land. The project area is generally flat. The project area is generally surrounded by low- density residential, forested, agricultural, and swamp land. The 1-A coordinates of the self-support communications tower location are as follows: Latitude: N 26° 17’ 22.00” (NAD 83) Longitude: W 81° 32’ 38.24” (NAD 83) On June 21, 2022, TEP’s SOI Qualified Archaeologist William Turner requested a search of the Florida Master Site File to determine if any historic properties were within the visual APE. The FCC designated APE for visual effects for towers under 200-ft tall is a 0.50-mile radius from the proposed tower centerline. No (0) historic properties were identified within the visual or direct APEs. Additionally, an archaeological assessment of the project’s direct effects was conducted by TEP’s SOI Qualified Archaeologist Corissa Wittholt on June 22, 2022, to meet the requirements of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Nationwide Programmatic Agreement (NPA) of October 4, 2004. The survey resulted in the identification of no (0) archaeological artifacts or sites. Based on the results of the direct assessment and background research completed by TEP on June 21, 2022, and June 22, 2022, we recommend that the project will have no effect on historic properties. It is the position of TEP that the proposed tower site does not appear to pose a threat to Native American sites of religious or cultural significance; however, we are requesting confirmation of our findings. The FCC Form 620 and attachments have been included for your review. If there are any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Thank you for your assistance and cooperation. Sincerely, Corissa Wittholt, M.A., RPA Cultural Resources Project Archaeologist Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. Page 1168 of 4908 500 E. 84th Ave., Suite C10, Thornton, CO 80229 O) (303) 566-9929 F) (919) 661-6350 tcns@tepgroup.net July 11, 2022 City of Naples Planning Department 295 Riverside Circle Naples, FL 34102 Subject: Proposed 180-ft (184-ft with appurtenances) AGL self-support communications tower Bridger Tower Corporation Site: Palmetto Ridge 2 (US-FL-5283) FCC TCNS #250040, Date Filed: 6/3/2022 31st Ave NE Naples, FL 61420 (Collier County) To Whom It May Concern: Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc., (TEP) is assisting Bridger Tower Corporation to complete a NEPA Checklist (FCC Compliance Act) for a proposed 180-ft AGL (184-ft AGL with appurtenances) self-support telecommunications tower and its associated telecommunications tower compound facility to be located at 31st Ave NE, east of a portion of Everglades Blvd N, south of a portion of 33rd Ave NE, in the eastern portion of the City of Naples, within Collier County, Florida (Parcel No. 40171120002). Please find enclosed for your review documents that describe this project, including a USGS Quadrangle map, descriptive project or site plan, and an aerial photograph of the proposed telecommunications tower site. Bridger Tower Corporation is reaching out to invite you to participate and provide input in the federally mandated review of the potential effects the proposed facility could have on historic properties. This review is conducted by Bridger Tower Corporation under the oversight of the FCC and includes input from interested federally recognized Tribes, and the public. The focus of this review is twofold: (1) whether or not any historic properties may exist in the area of this project; and (2) if so, whether the project may cause any effects to such properties. If you wish to participate in this historic review process, you are entitled to be a consulting party as envisioned by the National Historic Preservation Act. As a consulting party, you would be provided with copies of all documents and submissions made to the Florida SHPO, be notified of developments in historic review process, be entitled to consult and comment on the identification of historic properties in the designated area of potential effects (“APE”), provide input on any potential effects to historic properties, and the resolution of any adverse effects. Your participation would bring an additional perspective to the process. Please respond no later than August 10, 2022: 1) whether you wish to become a consulting party or if you do not wish to become a consulting party. If you chose not to become a consulting party, your comments are still welcome and should be provided by August 10, 2022. In addition, please feel free to reach out if you have any questions or would like further information about this particular project or historic review process. Thank you in advance for your consideration of this request and your attention to this matter. Sincerely, Corissa Wittholt , MA, RPA Cultural Resources Project Archaeologist Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. Page 1169 of 4908 500 E. 84th Ave., Suite C10, Thornton, CO 80229 O) (303) 566-9929 F) (919) 661-6350 tcns@tepgroup.net July 11, 2022 Mr. Timothy Finn, AICP Principal Planner 2800 North Horseshoe Drive North Naples, FL 34104 Subject: Proposed 180-ft (184-ft with appurtenances) AGL self-support communications tower Bridger Tower Corporation Site: Palmetto Ridge 2 (US-FL-5283) FCC TCNS #250040, Date Filed: 6/3/2022 31st Ave NE Naples, FL 61420 (Collier County) To Whom It May Concern: Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc., (TEP) is assisting Bridger Tower Corporation to complete a NEPA Checklist (FCC Compliance Act) for a proposed 180-ft AGL (184-ft AGL with appurtenances) self-support telecommunications tower and its associated telecommunications tower compound facility to be located at 31st Ave NE, east of a portion of Everglades Blvd N, south of a portion of 33rd Ave NE, in the eastern portion of the City of Naples, within Collier County, Florida (Parcel No. 40171120002). Please find enclosed for your review documents that describe this project, including a USGS Quadrangle map, descriptive project or site plan, and an aerial photograph of the proposed telecommunications tower site. Bridger Tower Corporation is reaching out to invite you to participate and provide input in the federally mandated review of the potential effects the proposed facility could have on historic properties. This review is conducted by Bridger Tower Corporation under the oversight of the FCC and includes input from interested federally recognized Tribes, and the public. The focus of this review is twofold: (1) whether or not any historic properties may exist in the area of this project; and (2) if so, whether the project may cause any effects to such properties. If you wish to participate in this historic review process, you are entitled to be a consulting party as envisioned by the National Historic Preservation Act. As a consulting party, you would be provided with copies of all documents and submissions made to the Florida SHPO, be notified of developments in historic review process, be entitled to consult and comment on the identification of historic properties in the designated area of potential effects (“APE”), provide input on any potential effects to historic properties, and the resolution of any adverse effects. Your participation would bring an additional perspective to the process. Please respond no later than August 10, 2022: 1) whether you wish to become a consulting party or if you do not wish to become a consulting party. If you chose not to become a consulting party, your comments are still welcome and should be provided by August 10, 2022. In addition, please feel free to reach out if you have any questions or would like further information about this particular project or historic review process. Thank you in advance for your consideration of this request and your attention to this matter. Sincerely, Corissa Wittholt , MA, RPA Cultural Resources Project Archaeologist Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. Page 1170 of 4908 Page 1171 of 4908 500 E. 84th Ave., Suite C10, Thornton, CO 80229 O) (303) 566-9929 F) (919) 661-6350 tcns@tepgroup.net July 11, 2022 Florida Historical Society 435 Brevard Avenue Cocoa, FL 32922 Subject: Proposed 180-ft (184-ft with appurtenances) AGL self-support communications tower Bridger Tower Corporation Site: Palmetto Ridge 2 (US-FL-5283) FCC TCNS #250040, Date Filed: 6/3/2022 31st Ave NE Naples, FL 61420 (Collier County) To Whom It May Concern: Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc., (TEP) is assisting Bridger Tower Corporation to complete a NEPA Checklist (FCC Compliance Act) for a proposed 180-ft AGL (184-ft AGL with appurtenances) self-support telecommunications tower and its associated telecommunications tower compound facility to be located at 31st Ave NE, east of a portion of Everglades Blvd N, south of a portion of 33rd Ave NE, in the eastern portion of the City of Naples, within Collier County, Florida (Parcel No. 40171120002). Please find enclosed for your review documents that describe this project, including a USGS Quadrangle map, descriptive project or site plan, and an aerial photograph of the proposed telecommunications tower site. Bridger Tower Corporation is reaching out to invite you to participate and provide input in the federally mandated review of the potential effects the proposed facility could have on historic properties. This review is conducted by Bridger Tower Corporation under the oversight of the FCC and includes input from interested federally recognized Tribes, and the public. The focus of this review is twofold: (1) whether or not any historic properties may exist in the area of this project; and (2) if so, whether the project may cause any effects to such properties. If you wish to participate in this historic review process, you are entitled to be a consulting party as envisioned by the National Historic Preservation Act. As a consulting party, you would be provided with copies of all documents and submissions made to the Florida SHPO, be notified of developments in historic review process, be entitled to consult and comment on the identification of historic properties in the designated area of potential effects (“APE”), provide input on any potential effects to historic properties, and the resolution of any adverse effects. Your participation would bring an additional perspective to the process. Please respond no later than August 10, 2022: 1) whether you wish to become a consulting party or if you do not wish to become a consulting party. If you chose not to become a consulting party, your comments are still welcome and should be provided by August 10, 2022. In addition, please feel free to reach out if you have any questions or would like further information about this particular project or historic review process. Thank you in advance for your consideration of this request and your attention to this matter. Sincerely, Corissa Wittholt , MA, RPA Cultural Resources Project Archaeologist Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. Page 1172 of 4908 500 E. 84th Ave., Suite C10, Thornton, CO 80229 O) (303) 566-9929 F) (919) 661-6350 tcns@tepgroup.net July 11, 2022 Naples Historical Society P.O. Box 201 Naples, FL 34106 Subject: Proposed 180-ft (184-ft with appurtenances) AGL self-support communications tower Bridger Tower Corporation Site: Palmetto Ridge 2 (US-FL-5283) FCC TCNS #250040, Date Filed: 6/3/2022 31st Ave NE Naples, FL 61420 (Collier County) To Whom It May Concern: Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc., (TEP) is assisting Bridger Tower Corporation to complete a NEPA Checklist (FCC Compliance Act) for a proposed 180-ft AGL (184-ft AGL with appurtenances) self-support telecommunications tower and its associated telecommunications tower compound facility to be located at 31st Ave NE, east of a portion of Everglades Blvd N, south of a portion of 33rd Ave NE, in the eastern portion of the City of Naples, within Collier County, Florida (Parcel No. 40171120002). Please find enclosed for your review documents that describe this project, including a USGS Quadrangle map, descriptive project or site plan, and an aerial photograph of the proposed telecommunications tower site. Bridger Tower Corporation is reaching out to invite you to participate and provide input in the federally mandated review of the potential effects the proposed facility could have on historic properties. This review is conducted by Bridger Tower Corporation under the oversight of the FCC and includes input from interested federally recognized Tribes, and the public. The focus of this review is twofold: (1) whether or not any historic properties may exist in the area of this project; and (2) if so, whether the project may cause any effects to such properties. If you wish to participate in this historic review process, you are entitled to be a consulting party as envisioned by the National Historic Preservation Act. As a consulting party, you would be provided with copies of all documents and submissions made to the Florida SHPO, be notified of developments in historic review process, be entitled to consult and comment on the identification of historic properties in the designated area of potential effects (“APE”), provide input on any potential effects to historic properties, and the resolution of any adverse effects. Your participation would bring an additional perspective to the process. Please respond no later than August 10, 2022: 1) whether you wish to become a consulting party or if you do not wish to become a consulting party. If you chose not to become a consulting party, your comments are still welcome and should be provided by August 10, 2022. In addition, please feel free to reach out if you have any questions or would like further information about this particular project or historic review process. Thank you in advance for your consideration of this request and your attention to this matter. Sincerely, Corissa Wittholt , MA, RPA Cultural Resources Project Archaeologist Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. Page 1173 of 4908 7/14/22, 4:29 PM Tower Engineering Professionals Mail - Invitation to Comment on TCNS #250040 https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=fc236889c4&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a%3Ar7449563360467079526&simpl=msg-a%3Ar-57474067…1/1 TEP-TCNS inbox <tcns@tepgroup.net> Invitation to Comment on TCNS #250040 2 messages TEP-TCNS inbox <tcns@tepgroup.net>Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 2:06 PM To: timothy.finn@colliercountyfl.gov Good afternoon, Please find attached a review packet for a proposed telecommunications project to be located in Collier County, FL. Please provide any comments within thirty (30) days and feel free to reach out with any questions about the site or the project. Thank you in advance for your time and consideration. PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS IS NOT A ZONING OR PERMIT APPLICATION. ANY SUCH REQUIRED PROCESSES WILL BE HANDLED AT ANOTHER TIME BY OTHERS, IF APPLICABLE. -- Best, Tower Engineering Professionals: Environmental Division Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. (www.tepgroup.net) Bridger Tower_Palmetto Ridge 2_City of Naples Packet_7.11.2022.pdf 9293K FinnTimothy <Timothy.Finn@colliercountyfl.gov>Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 7:22 AM To: TEP-TCNS inbox <tcns@tepgroup.net> Hello, Based on our GIS Historical Probability Maps there are no Historical Structures , Historical Districts, Historical/Archaeological Probability Areas, or Archaeological Sites on the area proposed for the telecommunications project. From: cbeam@tepgroup.net <cbeam@tepgroup.net> On Behalf Of TEP-TCNS inbox Sent: Monday, July 11, 2022 4:07 PM To: FinnTimothy <Timothy.Finn@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Invitation to Comment on TCNS #250040 EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. [Quoted text hidden] Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Page 1174 of 4908 LOCATION MAPNDRIVING DIRECTIONSCONTACT INFORMATIONINDEX OF SHEETSSHEETDESCRIPTIONT-121-A COORDINATES 31ST AVE NE,NAPLES, FL 34120(COLLIER COUNTY)SITE NAME:US-FL-5283PALMETTO RIDGE 2PL20210000117258947.485251PROJECT INFORMATIONSITE NAME:PROJECT DESCRIPTION:TOWER TYPE:SITE ADDRESS:(E911 ADDRESS TBD)184' SELF-SUPPORT TOWERUS-FL-5283 PALMETTORIDGE 2AREA OF CONSTRUCTION:ZONING:PARCEL #:10,000 ± SQ. FT.TOWER OWNER:BRIDGER TOWER CORPORATION1951 EAST 400TH ROADLECOMPTON, KS 66050DEREK DYE, PRESIDENT(785) 764-6682SITE APPLICANT:PROPERTY OWNER:CIVIL ENGINEER:ELECTRICAL ENGINEER:NAME:ADDRESS:CITY, STATE, ZIP:CONTACT:PHONE:NAME:ADDRESS:CITY, STATE, ZIP:CONTACT:PHONE:NAME:ADDRESS:CITY, STATE, ZIP:CONTACT:PHONE:NAME:ADDRESS:CITY, STATE, ZIP:CONTACT:PHONE:W 81° 32' 39.23" (NAD '83)N 26° 17' 21.52" (NAD '83)LATITUDELONGITUDEGROUND ELEVATION = 6,382.68' (NAVD '88)40171120002PROPOSED TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITYTOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS500 E. 84TH AVE, SUITE C10THORNTON, CO 80229OFFICE: (303) 566-9914www.tepgroup.netBRIDGER TOWER CORPORATION1951 EAST 400TH ROADLECOMPTON, KS 66050DEREK DYE(785) 764-6682CODE COMPLIANCEALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE PERFORMED AND INSTALLED INACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWING CODESAS ADOPTED BY THE LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES. NOTHING IN THESEPLANS IS TO BE CONSTRUED TO PERMIT WORK NOT CONFORMING TO THELATEST EDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWING:1.INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE(2018 EDITION)2.INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL3.ANSI/TIA/EIA-222-H4.NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE(2017 EDITION)5.CITY/COUNTY ORDINANCES6.IBC 2020 WINDZONE CODECALL FOR UNDERGROUNDUTILITIES PRIOR TO DIGGING(800) 424-5555EMERGENCY:CALL 911UTILITIES:POWER COMPANY:ADDRESS:CONTACT:PHONE:TELEPHONE COMPANY:CONTACT:PHONE:TBDFLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO751 39TH AVE NE, NAPLES, FL34120CUSTOMER SERVICE(239) 262-1322001-14-21ZONINGJFMNMCREVPROJECT DESCRIPTION & NOTESCONSTRUCTION OF A TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITY, CONSISTING OF ANTENNAS& ASSOCIATED APPURTENANCES ON A PROPOSED SELF-SUPPORT TOWER,FENCED COMPOUND & SERVICE EQUIPMENT FOR FUTURE CARRIERS. NO WATEROR SEWER IS REQUIRED.1.FACILITY DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE W/ COLLIER COUNTY REGULATIONS.2. THIS IS AN UNMANNED FACILITY WHICH WILL NOT REQUIRE ANY WATER ORSEWER FACILITIES.3. TRAFFIC WILL CONSIST ONLY OF MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL, VISITING THE SITEAPPROXIMATELY TWICE A MONTH.DRIVING SOUTH ON I-75 TAKE EXIT 111 TO IMMOKALEE RD. STAY IMMOKALEE RD FOR13.2 MILES. TURN RIGHT ONTO RANDALL BLVD AND STAY ON FOR 3.4 MILES. TURNLEFT ONTO EVERGLADES BLVD. THEN TURN RIGHT ONTO 31ST AVE NE. THEN THESITE WILL BE ON THE LEFT HAND SIDE OF THE ROAD.E - ESTATES ZONING JURISDICTION:COLLIER COUNTYLEGAL DESCRIPTION:GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 68TR 15 OR 1591 PG 55931ST AVE. NENAPLES, FL 34120(COLLIER COUNTY)REALTOR FOR TALBOT FOREST VIEW PROPERTIES, LLC8955 FONTANA DEL SOL WAYNAPLES, FL 34109BILL DUFFY(239) 641-7634SITESURVEYORNAME:ADDRESS:CITY, STATE, ZIP:CONTACT:PHONE:TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS, INC.326 TRYON RD.RALEIGH, NC 27603GRAYSON PHILLIPS(919) 661-6351BRIDGER TOWER CORPORATIONT1TITLE SHEETZ1WELL FIELD LOCATION222Z2PROPOSED TOWER LOCATIONSIGNAGEZ82LANDSCAPING PLANZ92DO NOT USE FORC O N S T R U C T I O NPRELIMINARYTOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS, INC.326 TRYON RD.RALEIGH, NC 27603GRAHAM M. ANDRES, PE(919) 661-6351TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS, INC.326 TRYON RD.RALEIGH, NC 27603GRAHAM M. ANDRES, P.E.(919) 661-6351112-19-21ZONING203-29-22ZONINGNAME:ADDRESS:CITY, STATE, ZIP:CONTACT:PHONE:LAW OFFICE:AGENT OF RECORDAERIAL2Z3EXTENDED SITE PLAN2Z4COMPOUND DETAIL2Z5TOWER ELEVATION2Z6FENCE DETAILS2Z7Page 1175 of 4908 001-14-21ZONINGUS-FL-5283 PALMETTO RIDGE 2258947.4852512TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS500 E. 84TH AVE, SUITE C10THORNTON, CO 80229OFFICE: (303) 566-9914www.tepgroup.netBRIDGER TOWER CORPORATION1951 EAST 400TH ROADLECOMPTON, KS 66050OFFICE: (785) 764-6682DO NOT USE FORCONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY112-19-21ZONING203-29-22ZONINGZ-1PROPOSED TOWERLOCATIONJFMNMCPROPOSED TOWER LOCATIONPage 1176 of 4908 001-14-21ZONINGUS-FL-5283 PALMETTO RIDGE 2258947.4852512TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS500 E. 84TH AVE, SUITE C10THORNTON, CO 80229OFFICE: (303) 566-9914www.tepgroup.netBRIDGER TOWER CORPORATION1951 EAST 400TH ROADLECOMPTON, KS 66050OFFICE: (785) 764-6682DO NOT USE FORCONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY112-19-21ZONING203-29-22ZONINGZ-2WELL FIELD OVERLAYJFMNMCWELL FIELD OVERLAYPage 1177 of 4908 001-14-21ZONINGUS-FL-5283 PALMETTO RIDGE 2258947.4852512TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS500 E. 84TH AVE, SUITE C10THORNTON, CO 80229OFFICE: (303) 566-9914www.tepgroup.netBRIDGER TOWER CORPORATION1951 EAST 400TH ROADLECOMPTON, KS 66050OFFICE: (785) 764-6682DO NOT USE FORCONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY112-19-21ZONING203-29-22ZONINGZ-3AERIALJFMNMCAERIALPage 1178 of 4908 31ST AVE. NE001-14-21ZONINGUS-FL-5283 PALMETTO RIDGE 2258947.4852512TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS500 E. 84TH AVE, SUITE C10THORNTON, CO 80229OFFICE: (303) 566-9914www.tepgroup.netBRIDGER TOWER CORPORATION1951 EAST 400TH ROADLECOMPTON, KS 66050OFFICE: (785) 764-6682DO NOT USE FORCONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY112-19-21ZONING203-29-22ZONINGZ-4EXTENDEDSITE PLANJFMNMCLEGENDNOTES:TOWER SETBACKSSITE PLANEVERGLADES BLVD. N Page 1179 of 4908 001-14-21ZONINGUS-FL-5283 PALMETTO RIDGE 2258947.4852512TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS500 E. 84TH AVE, SUITE C10THORNTON, CO 80229OFFICE: (303) 566-9914www.tepgroup.netBRIDGER TOWER CORPORATION1951 EAST 400TH ROADLECOMPTON, KS 66050OFFICE: (785) 764-6682DO NOT USE FORCONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY112-19-21ZONING203-29-22ZONINGJFMNMCZ-5COMPOUND DETAILCOMPOUNDDETAILPage 1180 of 4908 TOWER NOTES:001-14-21ZONINGUS-FL-5283 PALMETTO RIDGE 2258947.4852512TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS500 E. 84TH AVE, SUITE C10THORNTON, CO 80229OFFICE: (303) 566-9914www.tepgroup.netBRIDGER TOWER CORPORATION1951 EAST 400TH ROADLECOMPTON, KS 66050OFFICE: (785) 764-6682DO NOT USE FORCONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY112-19-21ZONING203-29-22ZONINGTOWER ELEVATIONZ-6TOWER ELEVATIONJFMNMCPage 1181 of 4908 001-14-21ZONINGUS-FL-5283 PALMETTO RIDGE 2258947.4852512TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS500 E. 84TH AVE, SUITE C10THORNTON, CO 80229OFFICE: (303) 566-9914www.tepgroup.netBRIDGER TOWER CORPORATION1951 EAST 400TH ROADLECOMPTON, KS 66050OFFICE: (785) 764-6682DO NOT USE FORCONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY112-19-21ZONING203-29-22ZONING NMCZ-7GATE STOP / KEEPER DETAILFENCEDETAILSTYPICAL FENCE ELEVATIONFENCE / BARBED WIRE ARM DETAILJFMGROUNDING AT GATE POSTGATE DETENT DETAILNOTE:Page 1182 of 4908 001-14-21ZONINGUS-FL-5283 PALMETTO RIDGE 2258947.4852512TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS500 E. 84TH AVE, SUITE C10THORNTON, CO 80229OFFICE: (303) 566-9914www.tepgroup.netBRIDGER TOWER CORPORATION1951 EAST 400TH ROADLECOMPTON, KS 66050OFFICE: (785) 764-6682DO NOT USE FORCONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY112-19-21ZONING203-29-22ZONINGZ-8PROPOSED SIGNAGEJFMNMCPROPOSED SIGNAGENOTICERadio frequency fields beyondthis point may exceed the FCCgeneral public exposure limit. Obey all posted signs and site guidelinesfor working in radio frequencyenvironments.SITE NAME:SITE NUMBER:FCC TOWER ID:Owned by: BRIDGER TOWER CORPORATIONTelephone: 785 - 764 - 6682NO TRESPASSINGPALMETTO RIDGE 2US-FL-5283US-FL-5283Page 1183 of 4908 GENERAL LANDSCAPING NOTESTREE DETAILSTREE PLANTING NOTES:ITEMQTY.COMMON NAMEBOTANICAL NAMEREMARKSTREESSPACINGPLANTING SCHEDULETAXODIUM DISTICHUMHEIGHTREQ.SPREAD/CALIPERMULCH-SHRUBS-001-14-21ZONINGUS-FL-5283 PALMETTO RIDGE 2258947.4852512TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS500 E. 84TH AVE, SUITE C10THORNTON, CO 80229OFFICE: (303) 566-9914www.tepgroup.netBRIDGER TOWER CORPORATION1951 EAST 400TH ROADLECOMPTON, KS 66050OFFICE: (785) 764-6682DO NOT USE FORCONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY112-19-21ZONING203-29-22ZONINGC-9LANDSCAPINGPLANLANDSCAPING PLANKESNMCPage 1184 of 4908 1108 16859 16859 20017 26985 27371Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community Page 1185 of 4908 Page 1186 of 4908 SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Figure 1: View north towards proposed tower centerline. Figure 2: View east towards proposed tower centerline. Page 1187 of 4908 Figure 3: View south towards proposed tower centerline. Figure 4: View west towards proposed tower centerline. Page 1188 of 4908 Figure 5: View south along the southern proposed access & utility easement. Figure 6: View North along the northern proposed access & utility easement. Page 1189 of 4908 Figure 7: View northwest along the northern proposed access & utility easement. Figure 8: View north along the northern proposed access & utility easement. Page 1190 of 4908 Page 1191 of 4908 ATTACHMENT 5 SECTION 106 – INDIAN RELIGIOUS SITES Page 1192 of 4908 Client: Bridger Tower Corporation Site Name: Palmetto Ridge 2 (US-FL-5283) TCNS# 250040 Date Filed: 06/03/2022 Date Notified by TCNS: 06/10/2022 Tribe/Nation Date Tribes Notified by TCNS Response Date FCC Form 620 Sent Date Concurrence/Response Received FCC Referral Date Additional Comments Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida 6/10/2022 If applicant/tower builder receives no response from the Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida within 30 days after notification through TCNS, the Miccosukee Tribe has no intereset in participating in pre-construction review of the proposed site. N/A N/A N/A No response by 07/10/2022; pre- construction obligations are discharged and project may proceed. Seminole Tribe of Florida 6/10/2022 No procedures listed in NOO.7/11/2022 N/A 08/18/2022, 15 days to respond if interested No response by 09/03/2022; pre- construction obligations are discharged and project may proceed. Seminole Nation of Oklahoma 6/10/2022 If applicant/tower builder receives no response from the Seminole Nation of Oklahoma within 30 days after notification through TCNS, the Seminole Nation of Oklahoma has no intereset in participating in pre-construction review of the proposed site. N/A N/A N/A No response by 07/10/2022; pre- construction obligations are discharged and project may proceed. Muscogee (Creek) Nation 6/10/2022 No procedures listed in NOO.7/11/2022 8/3/2022 N/A Concurrence received. Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma 6/10/2022 Send information via standard mail.7/11/2022 6/18/2022 N/A No Adverse Effect finding received. Thlopthlocco Tribal Town 6/10/2022 Send information via electronic mail.7/11/2022 N/A 08/18/2022, 15 days to respond if interested No response by 09/03/2022; pre- construction obligations are discharged and project may proceed. Local Gov't / Historic Preservation Collier County Planning Department Mailed and emailed review packet on 07/11/2022 07/12/2022 - no historic properties, historic districts, or archaeological sites identified within the APE. City of Naples Planning Department Mailed and emailed review packet on 07/11/2022 No response within 30-day review request timeframe Naples Historical Society Mailed and emailed review packet on 07/11/2022 No response within 30-day review request timeframe Florida Historical Society Mailed and emailed review packet on 07/11/2022 No response within 30-day review request timeframe Page 1193 of 4908 6/3/22, 1:28 PM Tower Construction Notification https://wireless2.fcc.gov/TribalHistoricNotification/asrConfirmation.htm 1/1 FCC Home | Search | Updates | E-Filing | Initiatives | For Consumers | Find People Tower Construction Notification FCC > WTB > Tower Construction Notification FCC Site Map Logged In: (Log Out) Section 106 Tower Construction Notification New Notification Notifications Home Your Notification has been successfully submitted to the FCC. The date for this Notification is 06/03/2022. Your Notification ID number is 250040. Please make a note of this Notification ID — print out this page for your records. A confirmation of this submitted notification will also be emailed to the email address specified in your notification. This system is intended to facilitate consultation under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act by providing early notification of proposed construction to Tribes and State Historic Preservation officers. This system is not to be used in place of Section 106 consultation, and use of this notification system in itself does not satisfy parties' obligations with respect to historic preservation review under the Commission's rules. Please note: the submission of this notification is NOT to be considered a submission for Antenna Structure Registration. Tower Structures that require antenna structure registration based on FCC Rules 47 C.F.R. Part 17 must complete FCC Form 854 after FAA clearance is obtained. ASR Help ASR License Glossary - FAQ - Online Help - Documentation - Technical Support ASR Online Systems TOWAIR- CORES/ASR Registration - ASR Online Filing - Application Search - Registration Search About ASR Privacy Statement - About ASR - ASR Home Federal Communications Commission 45 L Street NE Washington, DC 20554 More FCC Contact Information... Phone: 1-877-480-3201 TTY: 1-717-338-2824 Fax: 1-866-418-0232 Submit Help Request - Web Policies & Privacy Statement - Required Browser Plug-ins - Customer Service Standards - Freedom of Information Act Page 1194 of 4908 6/7/22, 9:42 AM Tower Engineering Professionals Mail - Proposed Tower Structure Info - Email ID #8164703 https://mail.google.com/mail/u/2/?ik=fc236889c4&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1734643010684926019&simpl=msg-f%3A17346430106…1/1 TEP-TCNS inbox <tcns@tepgroup.net> Proposed Tower Structure Info - Email ID #8164703 1 message towernotifyinfo@fcc.gov <towernotifyinfo@fcc.gov>Fri, Jun 3, 2022 at 1:27 PM To: tcns@tepgroup.net Dear Ryan A Malek, Thank you for submitting a notification regarding your proposed construction via the Tower Construction Notification System. Note that the system has assigned a unique Notification ID number for this proposed construction. You will need to reference this Notification ID number when you update your project's Status with us. Below are the details you provided for the construction you have proposed: Notification Received: 06/03/2022 Notification ID: 250040 Tower Owner Individual or Entity Name: TEP for Bridger Tower Corporation Consultant Name: Ryan A Malek Street Address: 326 Tryon Rd. City: Raleigh State: NORTH CAROLINA Zip Code: 27603 Phone: 919-661-6351 Email: tcns@tepgroup.net Structure Type: LTOWER - Lattice Tower Latitude: 26 deg 17 min 22.0 sec N Longitude: 81 deg 32 min 38.2 sec W Location Description: 31st Ave Ne City: Naples State: FLORIDA County: COLLIER Detailed Description of Project: Proposed construction of a 180-ft AGL (184-ft AGL overall) self support telecommunications tower and its associated tower compound facility. Ground Elevation: 4.7 meters Support Structure: 54.9 meters above ground level Overall Structure: 56.1 meters above ground level Overall Height AMSL: 60.8 meters above mean sea level Page 1195 of 4908 6/12/22, 4:04 PM Tower Engineering Professionals Mail - NOTICE OF ORGANIZATION(S) WHICH WERE SENT PROPOSED TOWER CONSTRU… https://mail.google.com/mail/u/2/?ik=fc236889c4&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1735230172091074371&simpl=msg-f%3A17352301720…1/4 TEP-TCNS inbox <tcns@tepgroup.net> NOTICE OF ORGANIZATION(S) WHICH WERE SENT PROPOSED TOWER CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION INFORMATION - Email ID #8167004 1 message towernotifyinfo@fcc.gov <towernotifyinfo@fcc.gov>Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 1:00 AM To: tcns@tepgroup.net Cc: tcnsweekly@fcc.gov Dear Applicant: Thank you for using the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) Tower Construction Notification System (TCNS). The purpose of this electronic mail message is to inform you that the following authorized persons were sent the notification that you provided through TCNS, which relates to your proposed antenna structure. The information was forwarded by the FCC to authorized TCNS users by electronic mail and/or regular mail (letter). We note that the review period for all parties begins upon receipt of the Submission Packet pursuant to Section VII.A of the NPA and notifications that do not provide this serve as information only. Persons who have received the notification that you provided include leaders or their designees of federally-recognized American Indian Tribes, including Alaska Native Villages (collectively "Tribal Nations"), Native Hawaiian Organizations (NHOs), and State Historic Preservation Officers (SHPOs). For your convenience in identifying the referenced Tribal Nations and NHOs and in making further contacts, the City and State of the Seat of Government for each Tribal Nation and NHO, as well as the designated contact person, is included in the listing below. We note that Tribal Nations may have Section 106 cultural interests in ancestral homelands or other locations that are far removed from their current Seat of Government. Pursuant to the Commission's rules as set forth in the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement for Review of Effects on Historic Properties for Certain Undertakings Approved by the Federal Communications Commission (NPA), all Tribal Nations and NHOs listed below must be afforded a reasonable opportunity to respond to this notification, consistent with the procedures set forth below, unless the proposed construction falls within an exclusion designated by the Tribal Nation or NHO. (NPA, Section IV.F.4). The notification that you provided was forwarded to the following Tribal Nations and NHOs. A Tribal Nation or NHO may not respond until a full Submission Packet is provided. If, upon receipt, the Tribal Nation or NHO does not respond within a reasonable time, you should make a reasonable effort at follow-up contact, unless the Tribal Nation or NHO has agreed to different procedures (NPA, Section IV.F.5). In the event a Tribal Nation or NHO does not respond to a follow-up inquiry, or if a substantive or procedural disagreement arises between you and a Tribal Nation or NHO, you must seek guidance from the Commission (NPA, Section IV.G). These procedures are further set forth in the FCC's Second Report and Order released on March 30, 2018 (FCC 18-30). 1. Real Estate Director Kevin Donaldson - Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida - Tamiami Station (PO Box: 440021) Miami, FL - hopel@miccosukeetribe.com - 305-223-8380 (ext: 2246) - regular mail If the applicant/tower builder receives no response from the Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida within 30 days after notification through TCNS, the Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida has no interest in participating in pre-construction review for the proposed site. The Applicant/tower builder, however, must immediately notify the Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida in the event archaeological properties or human remains are discovered during construction, consistent with Section IX of the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement and applicable law. 2. Compliance Review Supervisor THPO Compliance - Seminole Tribe of Florida - 30290 Josie Billie Hwy PMB 1004 Clewiston, FL - THPOcompliance@semtribe.com - 863-983-6549 (ext: 12245) - electronic mail Page 1196 of 4908 6/12/22, 4:04 PM Tower Engineering Professionals Mail - NOTICE OF ORGANIZATION(S) WHICH WERE SENT PROPOSED TOWER CONSTRU… https://mail.google.com/mail/u/2/?ik=fc236889c4&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1735230172091074371&simpl=msg-f%3A17352301720…2/4 3. Tribal Historic Preservation Officer Ben Yahola - Seminole Nation of Oklahoma - (PO Box: 1498) Wewoka, OK - tcns- sno@sno-nsn.gov - 405-234-5218 - electronic mail Exclusions: Please send all inquiries to email address: tcns-sno@sno-nsn.gov If the applicant/tower builder receives no response from the Seminole Nation of Oklahoma within 30 days after notification through TCNS, the Seminole Nation of Oklahoma has no interest in participating in pre-construction review for the proposed site. The Applicant/tower builder, however, must immediately notify the Seminole Nation of Oklahoma in the event archaeological properties or human remains are discovered during construction, consistent with Section IX of the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement and applicable law. 4. TCNS Coordinator Anne Edwards-Martel Ms - Muscogee (Creek) Nation - Highway 75 & Loop 56 (PO Box: 580) Okmulgee, OK - mcntcns@mcn-nsn.gov; section106@mcn-nsn.gov - 918-732-7639 - regular mail 5. Cell Tower Coordinator Kelly Nelson - Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma - 70500 East 128 Road Wyandotte, OK - celltower@estoo.net - 918-238-5151 (ext: 1861) - regular mail Exclusions: DO NOT EMAIL DOCUMENTATION; it will be deleted without being opened. Submit one printed color copy by US postal mail or other parcel carrier of all documentation to: Eastern Shawnee Tribe Attn: CellTower Program 70500 E. 128 Rd. Wyandotte, OK 74370 Provide a 1-page cover letter with the following information: a. TCNS Number b. Company Name c. Project Name, City, County, State d. Project type e. Project coordinates f. Contact information The Eastern Shawnee Procedures document is available and highly recommended for guidance; send an email to celltower@estoo.net requesting our most current copy. 6. Mekko Ryan Morrow - Thlopthlocco Tribal Town - P.O. Box 188 Okemah, OK - thpo@tttown.org - 000-000-0000 - electronic mail Exclusions: Thlopthlocco Tribal Town requests that all initial review materials required by applicable law be submitted by email directly to thpo@tttown.org. In addition, in the event archeological or cultural materials or human remains are discovered at any time during this undertaking, please notify Thlopthlocco Tribal Town immediately. The notification that you provided was also forwarded to the following SHPOs in the State in which you propose to construct and neighboring States. The information was provided to these SHPOs as a courtesy for their information and planning. You need make no effort at this time to follow up with any SHPO that does not respond to this notification. Prior to construction, you must provide the SHPO of the State in which you propose to construct (or the Tribal Historic Preservation Officer, if the project will be located on certain Tribal lands), with a Submission Packet pursuant to Section VII.A of the NPA unless the project is excluded from SHPO review under Section III D or E of the NPA. Page 1197 of 4908 6/12/22, 4:04 PM Tower Engineering Professionals Mail - NOTICE OF ORGANIZATION(S) WHICH WERE SENT PROPOSED TOWER CONSTRU… https://mail.google.com/mail/u/2/?ik=fc236889c4&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1735230172091074371&simpl=msg-f%3A17352301720…3/4 7. SHPO Lee Warner - Alabama Historical Commission - 468 South Perry Street Montgomery, AL - lwarner@mail.preserveala.org - 334-242-3184 - electronic mail 8. Deputy SHPO Elizabeth Ann Brown - Alabama Historical Commission - 468 South Perry Street Montgomery, AL - ebrown@mail.preserveala.org - 334-242-3185 - electronic mail 9. Deputy SHPO Compliance Review Laura A Kammerer - Div of Historical Resources, Dept of State - 500 S. Bronough St. Tallahassee, FL - lkammerer@dos.state.fl.us - 850-245-6333 - electronic mail 10. Historic Preservationist Corey Lentz - Florida Division of Historical Resources - 500 S. Bronough Street Tallahasse, FL - Corey.Lentz@dos.myflorida.com - 850-245-6333 - electronic mail TCNS automatically forwards all notifications to all Tribal Nations and SHPOs that have an expressed interest in the geographic area of a proposal. However, if a proposal for PTC wayside poles falls within a designated exclusion, you need not expect any response and need not pursue any additional process with that Tribal Nation or SHPO. In addition, a particular Tribal Nation or SHPO may also set forth policies or procedures within its details box that exclude from review certain facilities (for example, a statement that it does not review collocations with no ground disturbance; or that indicates that no response within 30 days indicates no interest in participating in pre-construction review). Please be advised that the FCC cannot guarantee that the contact(s) listed above have opened and reviewed an electronic or regular mail notification. If you learn that any of the above contact information is no longer valid, please contact the FCC by emailing tcnshelp@fcc.gov. The following information relating to the proposed tower was forwarded to the person(s) listed above: Notification Received: 06/03/2022 Notification ID: 250040 Excluded from SHPO Review: No Tower Owner Individual or Entity Name: TEP for Bridger Tower Corporation Consultant Name: Ryan A Malek Street Address: 326 Tryon Rd. City: Raleigh State: NORTH CAROLINA Zip Code: 27603 Phone: 919-661-6351 Email: tcns@tepgroup.net Structure Type: LTOWER - Lattice Tower Latitude: 26 deg 17 min 22.0 sec N Longitude: 81 deg 32 min 38.2 sec W Location Description: 31st Ave Ne City: Naples State: FLORIDA County: COLLIER Detailed Description of Project: Proposed construction of a 180-ft AGL (184-ft AGL overall) self support telecommunications tower and its associated tower compound facility. Ground Elevation: 4.7 meters Support Structure: 54.9 meters above ground level Overall Structure: 56.1 meters above ground level Overall Height AMSL: 60.8 meters above mean sea level If you have any questions or comments regarding this notice, please contact the FCC using the electronic Help Request form located on the FCC's website at: Page 1198 of 4908 6/12/22, 4:04 PM Tower Engineering Professionals Mail - NOTICE OF ORGANIZATION(S) WHICH WERE SENT PROPOSED TOWER CONSTRU… https://mail.google.com/mail/u/2/?ik=fc236889c4&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1735230172091074371&simpl=msg-f%3A17352301720…4/4 https://www.fcc.gov/wireless/available-support-services You may also call the FCC Support Center at (877) 480-3201 (TTY 717-338-2824). Hours are from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday through Friday (except Federal holidays). To provide quality service and ensure security, all telephone calls are recorded. Thank you, Federal Communications Commission Page 1199 of 4908 8/19/22, 11:43 AM Tower Engineering Professionals Mail - Proposed Construction of Communications Facilities Notification of Final Contacts - Emai… https://mail.google.com/mail/u/1/?ik=fc236889c4&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1741504016857530771&simpl=msg-f%3A17415040168…1/2 TEP-TCNS inbox <tcns@tepgroup.net> Proposed Construction of Communications Facilities Notification of Final Contacts - Email ID #32231 1 message towernotifyinfo@fcc.gov <towernotifyinfo@fcc.gov>Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 7:00 AM To: tcns@tepgroup.net Cc: tcnsweekly@fcc.gov TEP for U.S. Cellular Corporation Ryan A Malek 326 Tryon Rd. Raleigh, NC 27603 Dear Applicant: This letter addresses the proposed communications facilities listed below that you have referred to the Federal Communications Commission (Commission) for purposes of contacting federally recognized Indian Tribes, including Alaska Native Villages (collectively Indian Tribes), and Native Hawaiian Organizations (NHOs), as specified by Section IV.G of the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement (NPA). Consistent with the procedures outlined in the Commission's Wireless Infrastructure Second Report and Order (1), we have contacted the Indian Tribes or NHOs identified in the attached Table for the projects listed in the attached Table. You referred these projects to us between 08/11/2022 and 08/18/2022. Our contact with these Tribal Nations or NHOs was sent on 08/18/2022. Thus, as described in the Wireless Infrastructure Second Report and Order (2), if you or Commission staff do not receive a statement of interest regarding a particular project from any Tribe or NHO within 15 calendar days of 08/18/2022, your obligations under Section IV of the NPA with respect to these Tribal Nations or NHOs are complete. If a Tribal Nation or NHO responds that it has concerns about a historic property of traditional religious and cultural significance that may be affected by the proposed construction within the 15 calendar day period, the Applicant must involve it in the review as set forth in the NPA, and may not begin construction until the process set forth in the NPA is completed. You are reminded that Section IX of the NPA imposes independent obligations on an Applicant when a previously unidentified site that may be a historic property, including an archeological property, is discovered during construction or after the completion of review. In such instances, the Applicant must cease construction and promptly notify, among others, any potentially affected Tribal Nation or NHO. A Tribal Nation's or NHO's failure to express interest in participating in pre-construction review of an undertaking does not necessarily mean it is not interested in archeological properties or human remains that may inadvertently be discovered during construction. Hence, an Applicant is still required to notify any potentially affected Tribal Nation or NHO of any such finds pursuant to Section IX or other applicable law. Sincerely, Jill Springer Federal Preservation Officer Federal Communications Commission jill.springer@fcc.gov _______________________________________ 1) See Accelerating Wireless Broadband Deployment by Removing Barriers to Infrastructure Deployment, Second Report and Order, FCC 18-30 (Mar. 30, 2018) (Wireless Infrastructure Second Report and Order). 2) See id. at paras. 111-112. LIST OF PROPOSED COMMUNICATIONS TOWERS TCNS# 250564 Referred Date: 08/16/2022 Location: Garrett Hwy, Oakland, MD Detailed Description of Project: Proposed 195-ft (199-ft overall with appurtenances) AGL self-support communications tower. Tribe Name: Delaware Nation Tribe Name: Seneca-Cayuga Nation Tribe Name: Wyandotte Nation Page 1200 of 4908 8/19/22, 11:43 AM Tower Engineering Professionals Mail - Proposed Construction of Communications Facilities Notification of Final Contacts - Emai… https://mail.google.com/mail/u/1/?ik=fc236889c4&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1741504016857530771&simpl=msg-f%3A17415040168…2/2 TCNS# 250568 Referred Date: 08/16/2022 Location: 494 New Gravel Hill Rd, Friendsville, MD Detailed Description of Project: Proposed 195-ft (199-ft overall with appurtenances) self-support communications tower. Tribe Name: Seneca-Cayuga Nation TCNS# 250040 Referred Date: 08/15/2022 Location: 31st Ave Ne, Naples, FL Detailed Description of Project: Proposed construction of a 180-ft AGL (184-ft AGL overall) self support telecommunications tower and its associated tower compound facility. Tribe Name: Seminole Tribe of Florida Tribe Name: Thlopthlocco Tribal Town LEGEND: * - Notification numbers are assigned by the Commission staff for sites where initial contact was not made through TCNS. Page 1201 of 4908 August 3, 2022 Corissa Wittholt Tower Engineering Professionals 326 Tryon Road Raleigh, NC 27603-3530 RE: TCNS #250040 PALMETTO RIDGE 2 (US-FL-5283) 31ST Ave NE Naples, Collier County, FL Ms. Wittholt, Thank you for the correspondence regarding TCNS 250040. Collier County is outside of the Muscogee (Creek) Nation historic area of interest. We respectfully defer to the other Tribes that have been contacted. Should further information or comment be required please do not hesitate to contact me at (918) 732-7835, fax: (918) 758-0649, or by e-mail: clowe@mcn-nsn.gov Sincerely, Ms. Corain Lowe-Zepeda TCNS Manager Historic and Cultural Preservation Department Muscogee (Creek) Nation P.O. Box 580 l Okmulgee, OK 74447 T: 918-732-7835 E-Mail: clowe@mcn-nsn.gov HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION P.O. BOX 580 | OKMULGEE, OK 74447 T 918.732.7835 | F 918.758.0649 Page 1202 of 4908 Page 1203 of 4908 Page 1204 of 4908 Page 1205 of 4908 Indian Reservations in the Continental United States MAP INDEX Full Size Map (PDF) 1R'DWD $%6(17((6+$:1((* $&20$ $*8$&$/,(17( $/$%$0$&286+$77$ $/$%$0$48$66$57( &5((.6* $//(*$1< $3$&+(* %$'5,9(5 %$521$5$1&+ %$77/(02817$,1 %$<0,//6 %(17213$,87( %(55<&5((. %,*%(1' %,*&<35(66 %,*/$*221 %,*3,1( %,*9$//(< +8$/$3$, ,1$-$ ,2:$* ,6$%(//$ ,6/(7$ -$&.621 -(0(= -,&$5,//$ .$,%$% .$/,63(/ .$:* .,$/(*((&5((.* .,&.$322* .,2:$* ./$0$7+* .227(1$, / $16( /$&&2857( 25(,//(6 /$&'8)/$0%($8 5('&/,)) 5('/$.( 5(1263$5.6 5,1&21 52$5,1*&5((. 52&.<%2<6 526(%8' 5281'9$//(< 5806(< 6$&$1')2; 6$/75,9(5 6$1',$ 6$1'</$.( 6$17$$1$ 6$17$&/$5$ 6$17$'20,1*2 6$17$526$ 6$17$526$1257+ 6$17$<1(= Home Frequently Asked Questions Law and Regulations Online Databases Grants Training Notices Documents and Publications Review Committee Special Topics Contact National NAGPRA Page 1206 of 4908 %,6+23 %/$&.)((7 %5,'*(3257 %5,*+721 %85163$,87(&2/21< &$%(=21 &$''2* &$+8,//$ &$032 &$039(5'( &$121&,72 &$3,7$1*5$1'( &$5621 &$7$:%$ &$77$5$8*86 &$<8*$* &('$59,//( &+(+$/,6 &+(0(+8(9, &+(52.((* &+(<(11($5$3$+2(* &+(<(11(5,9(5 &+,&.$6$:* &+,7,0$&+$ &+2&7$:* &,7,=(1%$1'2) 327$:$720,* &2&+,7, &2(85' $/(1( &2/'635,1*6 /$&9,(8;'(6(57 /$*81$ /$69(*$6 /$<7219,//( /$-2//$ /$3267$ /,.(/< /21(3,1( /22.287 /26&2<27(6 /29(/2&.&2/21< /2:(5%58/( /2:(5(/:$+ /2:(56,28; /800, 0$.$+ 0$1&+(67(5 0$1=$1,7$ 0$5,&23$ 0$6+$178&.(7 3(4827 0$77$321, 0(120,1(( 0(6&$/(52 0,$0,* 0,&&268.(( 0,''/(72:1 0,//(/$&6 0,66,21 02$3$ 6$17$<6$%(/ 6$17(( 6$1&$5/26 6$1)(/,3( 6$1,/'()2162 6$1-8$1 6$10$18$/ 6$13$648$/ 6$1;$9,(5 6$8.68,$77/( 6(0,12/(* 6(1(&$&$<8*$* 6(48$1 6+$*7,&2.( 6+$.23(( 6+((35$1&+ 6+(5:22'9$//(< 6+,1*/(635,1* 6+,11(&2&. 6+2$/:$7(5 6+26+21( 6,/(7= 6,66(721 6.2.20,6+ 6.8//9$//(< 62%2%$ 6287+(5187( 632.$1( 648$;21,6/$1' 67&52,; Page 1207 of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age 1208 of 4908 )257%(/.1$3 )257%(57+2/' )257%,':(// )257+$// )257,1'(3(1'(1&( )2570&'(50,77 )2570&'2:(// )25702+$9( )2573(&. )257<80$ )76,//$3$&+(* *,/$%(1' *,/$5,9(5 *26+87( *5$1'(521'( *5$1'3257$*( *5$1'75$9(56( *5($7(5/((&+/$.( *5,1'6721( +$11$+9,//( +$9$683$, +2+ +2//<:22' +223$9$//(< +23, +28/7210$/,6((76 3$66$0$482''< 3$8&$7$8.3(4827 3$8*86(77 3$:1((* 3(&+$1*$ 3(12%6&27 3(25,$* 3,&85,6 3,1(5,'*( 32$5&+&5((. 32-2$48( 321&$* 3226(3$78&. 3257*$0%/( 32570$',621 327$:$720, 35$,5,(,6/( 38(572&,72 38<$//83 3<5$0,'/$.( 48$3$:* 48,//$<87( 48,1$8/7 5$0$+ 5$021$ 9(50,/,21/$.( 9,(-$6 :$/.(55,9(5 :$50635,1*6 :$6+2( :(67&2&23$+ :+,7(($57+ :,&+,7$* :,1'5,9(5 :,11(%$*2 :,11(08&&$ :22')25',1',$1 &20081,7< :<$1'277(* ;/5$1&+ <$.$0$ <$1.721 <$9$3$, <(5,1*721 <20%$ <6/(7$'(/685 <852. =,$ =81, 300 Page 1209 of 4908 ATTACHMENT 6 FLOODPLAIN MAP Page 1210 of 4908 National Flood Hazard Layer FIRMette 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000250 Feet Ü SEE FIS REPORT FOR DETAILED LEGEND AND INDEX MAP FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS Without Base Flood Elevation (BFE) Zone A, V, A99 With BFE or DepthZone AE, AO, AH, VE, AR Regulatory Floodway 0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard, Areas of 1% annual chance flood with average depth less than one foot or with drainage areas of less than one square mileZone X Future Conditions 1% Annual Chance Flood HazardZone X Area with Reduced Flood Risk due to Levee. See Notes.Zone X Area with Flood Risk due to LeveeZone D NO SCREEN Area of Minimal Flood Hazard Zone X Area of Undetermined Flood HazardZone D Channel, Culvert, or Storm Sewer Levee, Dike, or Floodwall Cross Sections with 1% Annual Chance 17.5 Water Surface Elevation Coastal Transect Coastal Transect Baseline Profile Baseline Hydrographic Feature Base Flood Elevation Line (BFE) Effective LOMRs Limit of Study Jurisdiction Boundary Digital Data Available No Digital Data Available Unmapped This map complies with FEMA's standards for the use of digital flood maps if it is not void as described below. The basemap shown complies with FEMA's basemap accuracy standards The flood hazard information is derived directly from the authoritative NFHL web services provided by FEMA. This map was exported on 9/6/2022 at 2:52 PM and does not reflect changes or amendments subsequent to this date and time. The NFHL and effective information may change or become superseded by new data over time. This map image is void if the one or more of the following map elements do not appear: basemap imagery, flood zone labels, legend, scale bar, map creation date, community identifiers, FIRM panel number, and FIRM effective date. Map images for unmapped and unmodernized areas cannot be used for regulatory purposes. Legend OTHER AREAS OF FLOOD HAZARD OTHER AREAS GENERAL STRUCTURES OTHER FEATURES MAP PANELS 8 B 20.2 The pin displayed on the map is an approximate point selected by the user and does not represent an authoritative property location. 1:6,000 81°32'52"W 26°17'38"N 81°32'15"W 26°17'6"N Basemap: USGS National Map: Orthoimagery: Data refreshed October, 2020 Page 1211 of 4908 LOCATION MAPNDRIVING DIRECTIONSCONTACT INFORMATIONINDEX OF SHEETSSHEETDESCRIPTIONT-121-A COORDINATES 31ST AVE NE,NAPLES, FL 34120(COLLIER COUNTY)SITE NAME:US-FL-5283PALMETTO RIDGE 2PL20210000117258947.485251PROJECT INFORMATIONSITE NAME:PROJECT DESCRIPTION:TOWER TYPE:SITE ADDRESS:(E911 ADDRESS TBD)184' SELF-SUPPORT TOWERUS-FL-5283 PALMETTORIDGE 2AREA OF CONSTRUCTION:ZONING:PARCEL #:10,000 ± SQ. FT.TOWER OWNER:BRIDGER TOWER CORPORATION1951 EAST 400TH ROADLECOMPTON, KS 66050DEREK DYE, PRESIDENT(785) 764-6682SITE APPLICANT:PROPERTY OWNER:CIVIL ENGINEER:ELECTRICAL ENGINEER:NAME:ADDRESS:CITY, STATE, ZIP:CONTACT:PHONE:NAME:ADDRESS:CITY, STATE, ZIP:CONTACT:PHONE:NAME:ADDRESS:CITY, STATE, ZIP:CONTACT:PHONE:NAME:ADDRESS:CITY, STATE, ZIP:CONTACT:PHONE:W 81° 32' 39.23" (NAD '83)N 26° 17' 21.52" (NAD '83)LATITUDELONGITUDEGROUND ELEVATION = 6,382.68' (NAVD '88)40171120002PROPOSED TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITYTOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS500 E. 84TH AVE, SUITE C10THORNTON, CO 80229OFFICE: (303) 566-9914www.tepgroup.netBRIDGER TOWER CORPORATION1951 EAST 400TH ROADLECOMPTON, KS 66050DEREK DYE(785) 764-6682CODE COMPLIANCEALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE PERFORMED AND INSTALLED INACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWING CODESAS ADOPTED BY THE LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES. NOTHING IN THESEPLANS IS TO BE CONSTRUED TO PERMIT WORK NOT CONFORMING TO THELATEST EDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWING:1.INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE(2018 EDITION)2.INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL3.ANSI/TIA/EIA-222-H4.NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE(2017 EDITION)5.CITY/COUNTY ORDINANCES6.IBC 2020 WINDZONE CODECALL FOR UNDERGROUNDUTILITIES PRIOR TO DIGGING(800) 424-5555EMERGENCY:CALL 911UTILITIES:POWER COMPANY:ADDRESS:CONTACT:PHONE:TELEPHONE COMPANY:CONTACT:PHONE:TBDFLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO751 39TH AVE NE, NAPLES, FL34120CUSTOMER SERVICE(239) 262-1322001-14-21ZONINGJFMNMCREVPROJECT DESCRIPTION & NOTESCONSTRUCTION OF A TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITY, CONSISTING OF ANTENNAS& ASSOCIATED APPURTENANCES ON A PROPOSED SELF-SUPPORT TOWER,FENCED COMPOUND & SERVICE EQUIPMENT FOR FUTURE CARRIERS. NO WATEROR SEWER IS REQUIRED.1.FACILITY DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE W/ COLLIER COUNTY REGULATIONS.2. THIS IS AN UNMANNED FACILITY WHICH WILL NOT REQUIRE ANY WATER ORSEWER FACILITIES.3. TRAFFIC WILL CONSIST ONLY OF MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL, VISITING THE SITEAPPROXIMATELY TWICE A MONTH.DRIVING SOUTH ON I-75 TAKE EXIT 111 TO IMMOKALEE RD. STAY IMMOKALEE RD FOR13.2 MILES. TURN RIGHT ONTO RANDALL BLVD AND STAY ON FOR 3.4 MILES. TURNLEFT ONTO EVERGLADES BLVD. THEN TURN RIGHT ONTO 31ST AVE NE. THEN THESITE WILL BE ON THE LEFT HAND SIDE OF THE ROAD.E - ESTATES ZONING JURISDICTION:COLLIER COUNTYLEGAL DESCRIPTION:GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 68TR 15 OR 1591 PG 55931ST AVE. NENAPLES, FL 34120(COLLIER COUNTY)REALTOR FOR TALBOT FOREST VIEW PROPERTIES, LLC8955 FONTANA DEL SOL WAYNAPLES, FL 34109BILL DUFFY(239) 641-7634SITESURVEYORNAME:ADDRESS:CITY, STATE, ZIP:CONTACT:PHONE:TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS, INC.326 TRYON RD.RALEIGH, NC 27603GRAYSON PHILLIPS(919) 661-6351BRIDGER TOWER CORPORATIONT1TITLE SHEETZ1WELL FIELD LOCATION222Z2PROPOSED TOWER LOCATIONSIGNAGEZ82LANDSCAPING PLANZ92DO NOT USE FORC O N S T R U C T I O NPRELIMINARYTOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS, INC.326 TRYON RD.RALEIGH, NC 27603GRAHAM M. ANDRES, PE(919) 661-6351TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS, INC.326 TRYON RD.RALEIGH, NC 27603GRAHAM M. ANDRES, P.E.(919) 661-6351112-19-21ZONING203-29-22ZONINGNAME:ADDRESS:CITY, STATE, ZIP:CONTACT:PHONE:LAW OFFICE:AGENT OF RECORDAERIAL2Z3EXTENDED SITE PLAN2Z4COMPOUND DETAIL2Z5TOWER ELEVATION2Z6FENCE DETAILS2Z7Page 1212 of 4908 001-14-21ZONINGUS-FL-5283 PALMETTO RIDGE 2258947.4852512TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS500 E. 84TH AVE, SUITE C10THORNTON, CO 80229OFFICE: (303) 566-9914www.tepgroup.netBRIDGER TOWER CORPORATION1951 EAST 400TH ROADLECOMPTON, KS 66050OFFICE: (785) 764-6682DO NOT USE FORCONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY112-19-21ZONING203-29-22ZONINGZ-1PROPOSED TOWERLOCATIONJFMNMCPROPOSED TOWER LOCATIONPage 1213 of 4908 001-14-21ZONINGUS-FL-5283 PALMETTO RIDGE 2258947.4852512TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS500 E. 84TH AVE, SUITE C10THORNTON, CO 80229OFFICE: (303) 566-9914www.tepgroup.netBRIDGER TOWER CORPORATION1951 EAST 400TH ROADLECOMPTON, KS 66050OFFICE: (785) 764-6682DO NOT USE FORCONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY112-19-21ZONING203-29-22ZONINGZ-2WELL FIELD OVERLAYJFMNMCWELL FIELD OVERLAYPage 1214 of 4908 001-14-21ZONINGUS-FL-5283 PALMETTO RIDGE 2258947.4852512TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS500 E. 84TH AVE, SUITE C10THORNTON, CO 80229OFFICE: (303) 566-9914www.tepgroup.netBRIDGER TOWER CORPORATION1951 EAST 400TH ROADLECOMPTON, KS 66050OFFICE: (785) 764-6682DO NOT USE FORCONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY112-19-21ZONING203-29-22ZONINGZ-3AERIALJFMNMCAERIALPage 1215 of 4908 31ST AVE. NE001-14-21ZONINGUS-FL-5283 PALMETTO RIDGE 2258947.4852512TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS500 E. 84TH AVE, SUITE C10THORNTON, CO 80229OFFICE: (303) 566-9914www.tepgroup.netBRIDGER TOWER CORPORATION1951 EAST 400TH ROADLECOMPTON, KS 66050OFFICE: (785) 764-6682DO NOT USE FORCONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY112-19-21ZONING203-29-22ZONINGZ-4EXTENDEDSITE PLANJFMNMCLEGENDNOTES:TOWER SETBACKSSITE PLANEVERGLADES BLVD. N Page 1216 of 4908 001-14-21ZONINGUS-FL-5283 PALMETTO RIDGE 2258947.4852512TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS500 E. 84TH AVE, SUITE C10THORNTON, CO 80229OFFICE: (303) 566-9914www.tepgroup.netBRIDGER TOWER CORPORATION1951 EAST 400TH ROADLECOMPTON, KS 66050OFFICE: (785) 764-6682DO NOT USE FORCONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY112-19-21ZONING203-29-22ZONINGJFMNMCZ-5COMPOUND DETAILCOMPOUNDDETAILPage 1217 of 4908 TOWER NOTES:001-14-21ZONINGUS-FL-5283 PALMETTO RIDGE 2258947.4852512TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS500 E. 84TH AVE, SUITE C10THORNTON, CO 80229OFFICE: (303) 566-9914www.tepgroup.netBRIDGER TOWER CORPORATION1951 EAST 400TH ROADLECOMPTON, KS 66050OFFICE: (785) 764-6682DO NOT USE FORCONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY112-19-21ZONING203-29-22ZONINGTOWER ELEVATIONZ-6TOWER ELEVATIONJFMNMCPage 1218 of 4908 001-14-21ZONINGUS-FL-5283 PALMETTO RIDGE 2258947.4852512TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS500 E. 84TH AVE, SUITE C10THORNTON, CO 80229OFFICE: (303) 566-9914www.tepgroup.netBRIDGER TOWER CORPORATION1951 EAST 400TH ROADLECOMPTON, KS 66050OFFICE: (785) 764-6682DO NOT USE FORCONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY112-19-21ZONING203-29-22ZONING NMCZ-7GATE STOP / KEEPER DETAILFENCEDETAILSTYPICAL FENCE ELEVATIONFENCE / BARBED WIRE ARM DETAILJFMGROUNDING AT GATE POSTGATE DETENT DETAILNOTE:Page 1219 of 4908 001-14-21ZONINGUS-FL-5283 PALMETTO RIDGE 2258947.4852512TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS500 E. 84TH AVE, SUITE C10THORNTON, CO 80229OFFICE: (303) 566-9914www.tepgroup.netBRIDGER TOWER CORPORATION1951 EAST 400TH ROADLECOMPTON, KS 66050OFFICE: (785) 764-6682DO NOT USE FORCONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY112-19-21ZONING203-29-22ZONINGZ-8PROPOSED SIGNAGEJFMNMCPROPOSED SIGNAGENOTICERadio frequency fields beyondthis point may exceed the FCCgeneral public exposure limit. Obey all posted signs and site guidelinesfor working in radio frequencyenvironments.SITE NAME:SITE NUMBER:FCC TOWER ID:Owned by: BRIDGER TOWER CORPORATIONTelephone: 785 - 764 - 6682NO TRESPASSINGPALMETTO RIDGE 2US-FL-5283US-FL-5283Page 1220 of 4908 GENERAL LANDSCAPING NOTESTREE DETAILSTREE PLANTING NOTES:ITEMQTY.COMMON NAMEBOTANICAL NAMEREMARKSTREESSPACINGPLANTING SCHEDULETAXODIUM DISTICHUMHEIGHTREQ.SPREAD/CALIPERMULCH-SHRUBS-001-14-21ZONINGUS-FL-5283 PALMETTO RIDGE 2258947.4852512TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS500 E. 84TH AVE, SUITE C10THORNTON, CO 80229OFFICE: (303) 566-9914www.tepgroup.netBRIDGER TOWER CORPORATION1951 EAST 400TH ROADLECOMPTON, KS 66050OFFICE: (785) 764-6682DO NOT USE FORCONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY112-19-21ZONING203-29-22ZONINGC-9LANDSCAPINGPLANLANDSCAPING PLANKESNMCPage 1221 of 4908 ATTACHMENT 7 SURFACE FEATURES (WETLANDS, DEFORESTATION, WATER DIVERSION) Page 1222 of 4908 Palmetto Ridge II NWI Map Source: Esri, Maxar, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community Wetlands Estuarine and Marine Deepwater Estuarine and Marine Wetland Freshwater Emergent Wetland Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland Freshwater Pond Lake Other Riverine March 4, 2021 0 0.1 0.20.05 mi 0 0.15 0.30.075 km 1:7,218 This page was produced by the NWI mapper National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) This map is for general reference only. The US Fish and Wildlife Service is not responsible for the accuracy or currentness of the base data shown on this map. All wetlands related data should be used in accordance with the layer metadata found on the Wetlands Mapper web site. Page 1223 of 4908 USGS 7.5-Minute Corkscrew SE, FL Topograhpic Quadrangle 3000 ft N➤➤N Page 1224 of 4908 Page 1225 of 4908 Page 1226 of 4908 RF Justification Package Everglades and 31st Ave NE with proposed zoning approved Golden Gate Boat Prepared by Verizon Wireless RF Engineering William Compton August 15th, 2023 Page 1227 of 4908 Capacity is the need for more wireless resources.Cell sites have a limited amount of resources to handle voice calls,data connections,and data volume.When these limits are reached,user experience quickly degrades.This could mean customers may no longer be able to make/receive calls nor be able to browse the internet.It could also mean that webpages will be very slow to download. Coverage is the need to expand wireless service into an area that either has no service or bad service. The request for service often comes from customers or emergency personnel. Expansion of service could mean improving the signal levels in a large apartment complex or new residential community. It could also mean providing new service along a newly built highway. Introduction: There are two main drivers that prompt the need for a new cell site.One is coverage and the other is capacity. Page 1228 of 4908 Capacity is the amount of resources a cell site has to handle customer demand. We utilize sophisticated programs that use current usage trends to forecast future capacity needs. Since it takes an average of (1-3) years to complete a cell site project, we have to start the acquisition process several years in advance to ensure the new cell site is in place before the existing cell site hits capacity limits. Location, Location, Location. A capacity cell site needs to be as close as possible to the center of the user population and network demand as that ensures a more even traffic distribution around the cell. A typical cell site is configured in a circular pie shape, with each slice (aka. sector) holding 33% of the total cell site resources. Optimal performance is achieved when traffic is evenly distributed across the 3 sectors. A new site placed too close to an existing cell site generates unwanted interference to existing customers and does not offload far away traffic and is therefore an ineffective capacity offload solution. Page 1229 of 4908 Need Case for: Everglades and 31st Ave NE The existing network in eastern Collier County near the intersection of Oil Well Road and Everglades Blvd has coverage and resulting capacity issues. The proposed site will be surrounded by single family residential buildout on large wooded lots which are very difficult to provide adequate service. This area generates significant numbers of customer complaints due to coverage and capacity issues. The proposed site will significantly enhance the coverage and capacity need in the area and will bring significant network performance improvements to the existing and future residents of this area. There are no existing structures in the area that could support the installation of the Verizon Wireless equipment needed . Note: The internal Verizon Wireless site name for this project is Desoto and Oil Well which describes the initial design area for the site. Subsequent zoning changes allowed a move to the much better solution discussed here. The following maps will use the VzW site name. Page 1230 of 4908 LTE AWS (Capacity Band) Current Coverage Zoning Approved not in service site Zoning Proposed not in service site Page 1231 of 4908 LTE AWS (Capacity Band) Proposed Coverage Zoning Approved not in service site Zoning Proposed not in service site Page 1232 of 4908 LTE AWS (Capacity Band) Proposed Coverage Zoning Approved not in service site Zoning Proposed not in service site Page 1233 of 4908 Neighbor Sites with VzW Installations and Distance G F E C B A I H D 5.6miles 6.7miles 9.0miles 8.6miles 7.5miles 5.6miles 3.6miles 3.3miles Z 6.8miles 3.9miles Page 1234 of 4908 First Tier Neighbors Zoning Approved and Proposed Site Information Map Label Latitude Longitude FCC ASR FCC Structure Owner Structure Max Height (ft)Structure Type VzW Centerline (ft)VzW Site Name A 26.36748 -81.56982 1204878 SBA 280 Lattice 182 ACME Immokalee B 26.32213 -81.44313 1268378 SBA 100 Unipole 65 Ave Maria Utility C 26.3102 -81.40051 1217351 ATC 250 Lattice 150 Ave Maria D 26.17012 -81.50412 1213946 ATC 400 Guyed 235 Lucky Lake E 26.18312 -81.57482 1020484 Alpert Tower 1017 Guyed 220 Alpine Broadcasting F 26.22841 -81.63218 1208812 Golden Gate Fire Control 160 Lattice 143 Baker G 26.25444 -81.62508 1022178 CCATT LLC 281 Lattice 140 Crown Rock Road H 26.27644 -81.6011 1238039 ATC 200 Monopole 182 Forth Island Zoning Approved Site Z 26.22971 -81.57235 TBD Vertical Bridge 140 Monopine 135 Golden Gate Boat Proposed Site 26.28931 -81.54423 TBD 184 Lattice 176 Page 1235 of 4908 Initial Search Ring (Work Around due to Estates Zoning Limitations) Coordinates: 26.294 -81.5138 Radius 1 mile Page 1236 of 4908 Acceptable Placement Area (With new Estates Zoning in Place) Center Coordinates: 26.288009° -81.530461° radius 2mi north to south radius 1.1m east to west Page 1237 of 4908 Additional Information Page 1238 of 4908 At Verizon Wireless RF Justification maps are created based on the internal project justifications for the project. Typically there are not instances where neighboring sites that meet those 2 very different RF Justification criteria exist, but the uniqueness of Golden Gate Estates in eastern Collier County and the extreme delays in building solutions for the area has resulted in just such a case. The RF Justification criteria are either Coverage or Capacity. Coverage sites are justified based on the primary need for the site is RF Coverage, Capacity sites are justified based on the primary need for the site is to offload capacity issues from neighboring sites. The Golden Gate and Everglades site was internally identified and budgeted as a Coverage justified site and therefore the frequency band used for the RF propagation maps chosen is the 700Mhz (Coverage oriented) frequency band. The Everglades Ave and 31st site was internally identified and budgeted as a Capacity site and therefore, the frequency band chosen for the propagation maps default to our primary capacity layer which is the 2,100Mhz/AWS (Capacity oriented) frequency band. The different frequency bands propagate very differently due to the physics of RF wave theory and therefore the resulting RF “coverage” maps produced will vary greatly. Coverage Map Differences Between RF Justification Presentations Page 1239 of 4908 AT&T Mobility 5395 NE 14th Ave Ft Lauderdale, FL 33334 Collier County, October 4, 2023 RE: Letter in support of need for new AT&T site at or near the location of the proposed Vertical Bridge tower build “US-FL-5283 Palmetto Ridge” in Collier County, FL. Summary AT&T has an existing and ongoing need for a new facility in the vicinity of the proposed Vertical Bridge tower build to improve coverage, capacity and service experience for our customers in the vicinity. The required improvements to coverage and service quality cannot be accomplished through modifications to AT&Ts existing sites. If the proposed Vertical Bridge tower were built, AT&T would consider it a good candidate to improve service in the area and would explore co-location on the tower. The following page shows AT&Ts desired search ring for this site. Sincerely, Maiko Llanes, RF Design Engineer AT&T Mobility Page 1240 of 4908 AT&T Mobility 5395 NE 14th Ave Ft Lauderdale, FL 33334 Page 1241 of 4908 Page 1242 of 4908 Page 1243 of 4908 RF Justification Package Everglades and 31st Ave NE with proposed zoning approved Golden Gate Boat Prepared by Verizon Wireless RF Engineering William Compton August 15th, 2023 Page 1244 of 4908 Capacity is the need for more wireless resources.Cell sites have a limited amount of resources to handle voice calls,data connections,and data volume.When these limits are reached,user experience quickly degrades.This could mean customers may no longer be able to make/receive calls nor be able to browse the internet.It could also mean that webpages will be very slow to download. Coverage is the need to expand wireless service into an area that either has no service or bad service. The request for service often comes from customers or emergency personnel. Expansion of service could mean improving the signal levels in a large apartment complex or new residential community. It could also mean providing new service along a newly built highway. Introduction: There are two main drivers that prompt the need for a new cell site.One is coverage and the other is capacity. Page 1245 of 4908 Capacity is the amount of resources a cell site has to handle customer demand. We utilize sophisticated programs that use current usage trends to forecast future capacity needs. Since it takes an average of (1-3) years to complete a cell site project, we have to start the acquisition process several years in advance to ensure the new cell site is in place before the existing cell site hits capacity limits. Location, Location, Location. A capacity cell site needs to be as close as possible to the center of the user population and network demand as that ensures a more even traffic distribution around the cell. A typical cell site is configured in a circular pie shape, with each slice (aka. sector) holding 33% of the total cell site resources. Optimal performance is achieved when traffic is evenly distributed across the 3 sectors. A new site placed too close to an existing cell site generates unwanted interference to existing customers and does not offload far away traffic and is therefore an ineffective capacity offload solution. Page 1246 of 4908 Need Case for: Everglades and 31st Ave NE The existing network in eastern Collier County near the intersection of Oil Well Road and Everglades Blvd has coverage and resulting capacity issues. The proposed site will be surrounded by single family residential buildout on large wooded lots which are very difficult to provide adequate service. This area generates significant numbers of customer complaints due to coverage and capacity issues. The proposed site will significantly enhance the coverage and capacity need in the area and will bring significant network performance improvements to the existing and future residents of this area. There are no existing structures in the area that could support the installation of the Verizon Wireless equipment needed . Note: The internal Verizon Wireless site name for this project is Desoto and Oil Well which describes the initial design area for the site. Subsequent zoning changes allowed a move to the much better solution discussed here. The following maps will use the VzW site name. Page 1247 of 4908 LTE AWS (Capacity Band) Current Coverage Zoning Approved not in service site Zoning Proposed not in service site Page 1248 of 4908 LTE AWS (Capacity Band) Proposed Coverage Zoning Approved not in service site Zoning Proposed not in service site Page 1249 of 4908 LTE AWS (Capacity Band) Proposed Coverage Zoning Approved not in service site Zoning Proposed not in service site Page 1250 of 4908 Neighbor Sites with VzW Installations and Distance G F E C B A I H D 5.6miles 6.7miles 9.0miles 8.6miles 7.5miles 5.6miles 3.6miles 3.3miles Z 6.8miles 3.9miles Page 1251 of 4908 First Tier Neighbors Zoning Approved and Proposed Site Information Map Label Latitude Longitude FCC ASR FCC Structure Owner Structure Max Height (ft)Structure Type VzW Centerline (ft)VzW Site Name A 26.36748 -81.56982 1204878 SBA 280 Lattice 182 ACME Immokalee B 26.32213 -81.44313 1268378 SBA 100 Unipole 65 Ave Maria Utility C 26.3102 -81.40051 1217351 ATC 250 Lattice 150 Ave Maria D 26.17012 -81.50412 1213946 ATC 400 Guyed 235 Lucky Lake E 26.18312 -81.57482 1020484 Alpert Tower 1017 Guyed 220 Alpine Broadcasting F 26.22841 -81.63218 1208812 Golden Gate Fire Control 160 Lattice 143 Baker G 26.25444 -81.62508 1022178 CCATT LLC 281 Lattice 140 Crown Rock Road H 26.27644 -81.6011 1238039 ATC 200 Monopole 182 Forth Island Zoning Approved Site Z 26.22971 -81.57235 TBD Vertical Bridge 140 Monopine 135 Golden Gate Boat Proposed Site 26.28931 -81.54423 TBD 184 Lattice 176 Page 1252 of 4908 Initial Search Ring (Work Around due to Estates Zoning Limitations) Coordinates: 26.294 -81.5138 Radius 1 mile Page 1253 of 4908 Acceptable Placement Area (With new Estates Zoning in Place) Center Coordinates: 26.288009° -81.530461° radius 2mi north to south radius 1.1m east to west Page 1254 of 4908 Additional Information Page 1255 of 4908 At Verizon Wireless RF Justification maps are created based on the internal project justifications for the project. Typically there are not instances where neighboring sites that meet those 2 very different RF Justification criteria exist, but the uniqueness of Golden Gate Estates in eastern Collier County and the extreme delays in building solutions for the area has resulted in just such a case. The RF Justification criteria are either Coverage or Capacity. Coverage sites are justified based on the primary need for the site is RF Coverage, Capacity sites are justified based on the primary need for the site is to offload capacity issues from neighboring sites. The Golden Gate and Everglades site was internally identified and budgeted as a Coverage justified site and therefore the frequency band used for the RF propagation maps chosen is the 700Mhz (Coverage oriented) frequency band. The Everglades Ave and 31st site was internally identified and budgeted as a Capacity site and therefore, the frequency band chosen for the propagation maps default to our primary capacity layer which is the 2,100Mhz/AWS (Capacity oriented) frequency band. The different frequency bands propagate very differently due to the physics of RF wave theory and therefore the resulting RF “coverage” maps produced will vary greatly. Coverage Map Differences Between RF Justification Presentations Page 1256 of 4908 Page 1257 of 4908 Page 1 of 25 Laura DeJohn Collier County Growth Management Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 Re: Site Acquisition Methodology for US-FL-5283 Palmetto Ridge II Dear Ms. DeJohn, I lead the site acquisition process on site US-FL-5283 Palmetto Ridge II (“Palmetto Ridge II”) for Bridger Tower Corporation (“Bridger”). Palmetto Ridge II is a 180’ AGL lattice style communication tower proposed at 3147 31St Ave NE, in Collier County, Florida, (Parcel No. 40171120002 to solve a gap in service for Verizon in and around the area of Everglades Blvd, 31st Avenue, and Oil Well Road. Verizon will be the anchor tenant and their proposed coverage will serve an area with an estimated general population of 5,000 persons. Verizon is experiencing a gap in service that consists primarily of a lack of capacity, brought on by a lack of coverage of higher capacity radio bands licensed to Verizon. Verizon originally requested a 250’ AGL self- support style communication tower. I began site acquisition work for Palmetto Ridge II on 07/19/2020. During that time, I pursued 12 parcels to more advanced stages of negotiations and drove the entire search ring numerous times, looking for different locations while searching for a suitable property that met the requirements of the County’s Land Development Code (LDC), met Verizon’s RF objectives, and had a landlord willing to lease their land. The site acquisition search lasted until 11/09/2021, when Bridger secured a lease on the 3147 31St Ave NE, property. The site acquisition process ultimately took 16 months. The site acquisition process begins when I receive the anchor tenant’s structure requirements and search area. These parameters are informed by the carrier’s RF needs. After I review the anchor’s parameters, I then map the search area to identify any existing towers that may be within it. Then I perform a reconnaissance drive, which confirms whether there are unregistered towers or structures of adequate height that could be viable for colocation. If neither of those are present, I also begin identifying potential locations for a new tower during the reconnaissance drive. The process of identifying the appropriate landowner “contact” varies from search area to search area. It can be as short as a few days or, in extreme cases, it can last many months. During that time, I contact candidate properties via phone, email, and websites; physically visit locations; and send letters to property owners of record. Once contact is established, I am often “bounced” around within organizations until the appropriate decision maker is identified. In many cases, once I speak with a potential “contact,” they immediately decline the proposal. When an interested landowner wishes to pursue the proposal, communication can continue for months as information and lease negotiations are shared with boards, family members, and other stakeholders. Unfortunately, the majority of the time, the proposal will be declined. Below is a list of all parcels located within the search area that qualify under the Collier County Land Page 1258 of 4908 Page 2 of 25 Development Code. Analyzed parcels located within the search ring are organized by major road. Aerials for each major street, as well as an overall aerial showing the search area, are below. Image of the Verizon and AT&T Search Areas. The Verizon Search area is outlined in Yellow while the AT&T Search area is outlined in blue. The portion of the AT&T Search Area that does not overlap with the Verizon Search Area is not included in this analysis as AT&T is not the Anchor Tenant. Therefore, the site cannot be located outside of the Verizon Search Area. NOTE: Some of the parcels below were evaluated utilizing Collier County GIS Zoning Maps Page 1259 of 4908 Page 3 of 25 Everglades Blvd, North of Oil Well Rd Everglades Blvd Parcel Map This segment Everglades Blvd consists of 60 qualifying parcels within the search ring: 39770840008 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. Page 1260 of 4908 Page 4 of 25 39770800006 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39770760007 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39770720005 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39770640004 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39843200009 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39843240001 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39843080009 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39770400008 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39770320007 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. Page 1261 of 4908 Page 5 of 25 39770360009 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39770200004 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39843000005 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39843040007 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39842920005 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39842840004 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39842800002 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39842680002 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39770160102 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. Page 1262 of 4908 Page 6 of 25 39770120003 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39770080004 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39770040002 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39951240003 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39951160109 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39951160002 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39842560009 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39842440006 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39902280009 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. Page 1263 of 4908 Page 7 of 25 39902080005 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39951120000 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39951040009 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39950920007 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39950800004 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39950840006 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39902000001 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39901880002 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39901920001 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. Page 1264 of 4908 Page 8 of 25 39901840000 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39901800008 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39901760009 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39950760005 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39950720003 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39950640002 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39950560001 • Explanation – This parcel would not be able to provide setbacks from Estates zoned lands that are equal to or larger than the selected parcel. 39902000001 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39901880002 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. Page 1265 of 4908 Page 9 of 25 39901920001 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39901840000 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39901800008 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39901760009 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39901600004 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39901640006 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39901560005 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39901520003 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39901520100 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. Page 1266 of 4908 Page 10 of 25 39901440002 • Explanation – This parcel would not be able to provide setbacks from Estates zoned lands that are equal to or larger than the selected parcel. 39950440008 • Explanation – I attempted to contact the property owner but did not receive a response. We would find ourselves in an identical zoning situation on this parcel as we currently find ourselves. 39950400006 • Explanation – This parcel is developed entirely as a water retention pond. 39901280000 Explanation – This parcel would not be able to provide setbacks from Estates zoned lands that are equal to or larger than the selected parcel. 39901200006 • Explanation – This parcel would not be able to provide setbacks from Estates zoned lands that are equal to or larger than the selected parcel. Therefore, no feasible alternate sites exist along this major road. Page 1267 of 4908 Page 11 of 25 Everglades Blvd, Between Randall Blvd and Oil Well Rd Everglades Blvd Parcel Map This segment of Everglades Blvd consists of 38 qualifying parcels: 39950080002 • Explanation –This parcel does not provide setbacks from existing structures that would be equal to or greater than the parent parcel. 40171120002 • Explanation –This is the parcel that was selected. Page 1268 of 4908 Page 12 of 25 39901000109 • Explanation –I attempted to contact the property owner but did not receive a response. 39901000002 • Explanation –I attempted to contact the property owner but did not receive a response. 40244480006 • Explanation –I attempted to contact the property owner but did not receive a response. 40244440004 • Explanation –I attempted to contact the property owner but did not receive a response. 40244320001 • Explanation –This parcel has inadequate space for the tower site. 40171080003 • Explanation – I attempted to contact the property owner but did not receive a response. 40171000009 • Explanation – I attempted to contact the property owner but did not receive a response. 40170920009 • Explanation – I attempted to contact the property owner but did not receive a response. 40170920106 • Explanation –I attempted to contact the property owner but did not receive a response. 40170840008 • Explanation – This parcel does not provide setbacks from existing structures that would be equal to or greater than the parent parcel. 40170880000 • Explanation – Parcel does not allow setbacks from existing structures No access 40244240000 • Explanation –I attempted to contact the property owner but did not receive a response. 40244200008 • Explanation –I attempted to contact the property owner but did not receive a response. Page 1269 of 4908 Page 13 of 25 40243960006 • Explanation – This parcel does not provide setbacks from existing structures that would be equal to or greater than the parent parcel and lacks a usable access point. 40244000004 • Explanation –I attempted to contact the property owner but did not receive a response. 40170760007 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40170680006 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40170640004 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40170520001 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40243520006 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40243480007 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40243440005 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. Page 1270 of 4908 Page 14 of 25 40243360004 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40243400003 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40170480002 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40170440000 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40170360009 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40170400008 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40170280008 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40170200004 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40243320002 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. Page 1271 of 4908 Page 15 of 25 40243320002 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40243240001 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40243040007 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. Therefore, no feasible alternate sites exist along this major road. Page 1272 of 4908 Page 16 of 25 Everglades Blvd, South of Randall Blvd Everglades Blvd Parcel Map This segment of Everglades Blvd consists of 32 qualifying parcels: 40170160005 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40170080004 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. Page 1273 of 4908 Page 17 of 25 40351400005 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40243000005 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40304200003 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40304160004 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40351320004 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40351280005 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40351000007 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40304120002 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. Page 1274 of 4908 Page 18 of 25 40304000009 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40303920009 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40303960001 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40303880107 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40350960009 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40350600000 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40303800006 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40303760007 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40303720102 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. Page 1275 of 4908 Page 19 of 25 40303720005 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40303680006 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40303640004 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40350560001 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40350200109 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40303520001 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40303560003 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40303440000 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40303480002 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. Page 1276 of 4908 Page 20 of 25 40303400008 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40350160003 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40350120001 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40303360106 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. Therefore, no feasible alternate sites exist along this major road. Page 1277 of 4908 Page 21 of 25 Oil Well Road Oil Well Road Parcel Map Oil Well Road consists of 14 qualifying parcels, within the search ring: 39900880003 • Explanation – This parcel would not be able to provide setbacks from Estates zoned lands that are equal to or larger than the selected parcel. 39900840001 • Explanation – This parcel would not be able to provide setbacks from Estates zoned lands that are equal to or larger than the selected parcel. 39900960004 • Explanation –This is inadequate space on this parcel because it is fully occupied by the parent use. 40010600007 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. Page 1278 of 4908 Page 22 of 25 40010680001 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 73650000102 • Explanation –This parcel is planned to be used for a future right of way expansion. 73650000267 • Explanation –This parcel is within a floodplain. 73650000241 • Explanation –I attempted to contact the property owner but did not receive a response. 73650000063 • Explanation –I attempted to contact the property owner but did not receive a response. 73650000225 • Explanation –I attempted to contact the property owner but did not receive a response. 73650000021 • Explanation –I attempted to contact the property owner but did not receive a response. 73650000283 • Explanation –I attempted to contact the property owner but did not receive a response. 73650000089 • Explanation –I attempted to contact the property owner but did not receive a response. 73650000047 • Explanation –This parcel is within a floodplain. Therefore, no feasible alternate sites exist along this major road. Page 1279 of 4908 Page 23 of 25 Randall Blvd and Sabal Palm Middle School Randall Blvd Parcel Map Page 1280 of 4908 Page 24 of 25 Sabal Palm Parcel Map Randall Blvd consists of 3 qualifying parcels and one potentially qualifying parcel within the search ring: 40243080009 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40243080009 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40242960007 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. Page 1281 of 4908 Page 1282 of 4908 Page 1 of 25 Laura DeJohn Collier County Growth Management Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 Re: Site Acquisition Methodology for US-FL-5283 Palmetto Ridge II Dear Ms. DeJohn, I lead the site acquisition process on site US-FL-5283 Palmetto Ridge II (“Palmetto Ridge II”) for Bridger Tower Corporation (“Bridger”). Palmetto Ridge II is a 180’ AGL lattice style communication tower proposed at 3147 31St Ave NE, in Collier County, Florida, (Parcel No. 40171120002 to solve a gap in service for Verizon in and around the area of Everglades Blvd, 31st Avenue, and Oil Well Road. Verizon will be the anchor tenant and their proposed coverage will serve an area with an estimated general population of 5,000 persons. Verizon is experiencing a gap in service that consists primarily of a lack of capacity, brought on by a lack of coverage of higher capacity radio bands licensed to Verizon. Verizon originally requested a 250’ AGL self- support style communication tower. I began site acquisition work for Palmetto Ridge II on 07/19/2020. During that time, I pursued 12 parcels to more advanced stages of negotiations and drove the entire search ring numerous times, looking for different locations while searching for a suitable property that met the requirements of the County’s Land Development Code (LDC), met Verizon’s RF objectives, and had a landlord willing to lease their land. The site acquisition search lasted until 11/09/2021, when Bridger secured a lease on the 3147 31St Ave NE, property. The site acquisition process ultimately took 16 months. The site acquisition process begins when I receive the anchor tenant’s structure requirements and search area. These parameters are informed by the carrier’s RF needs. After I review the anchor’s parameters, I then map the search area to identify any existing towers that may be within it. Then I perform a reconnaissance drive, which confirms whether there are unregistered towers or structures of adequate height that could be viable for colocation. If neither of those are present, I also begin identifying potential locations for a new tower during the reconnaissance drive. The process of identifying the appropriate landowner “contact” varies from search area to search area. It can be as short as a few days or, in extreme cases, it can last many months. During that time, I contact candidate properties via phone, email, and websites; physically visit locations; and send letters to property owners of record. Once contact is established, I am often “bounced” around within organizations until the appropriate decision maker is identified. In many cases, once I speak with a potential “contact,” they immediately decline the proposal. When an interested landowner wishes to pursue the proposal, communication can continue for months as information and lease negotiations are shared with boards, family members, and other stakeholders. Unfortunately, the majority of the time, the proposal will be declined. Below is a list of all parcels located within the search area that qualify under the Collier County Land Page 1283 of 4908 Page 2 of 25 Development Code. Analyzed parcels located within the search ring are organized by major road. Aerials for each major street, as well as an overall aerial showing the search area, are below. Image of the Verizon and AT&T Search Areas. The Verizon Search area is outlined in Yellow while the AT&T Search area is outlined in blue. The portion of the AT&T Search Area that does not overlap with the Verizon Search Area is not included in this analysis as AT&T is not the Anchor Tenant. Therefore, the site cannot be located outside of the Verizon Search Area. NOTE: Some of the parcels below were evaluated utilizing Collier County GIS Zoning Maps Page 1284 of 4908 Page 3 of 25 Everglades Blvd, North of Oil Well Rd Everglades Blvd Parcel Map This segment Everglades Blvd consists of 60 qualifying parcels within the search ring: 39770840008 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. Page 1285 of 4908 Page 4 of 25 39770800006 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39770760007 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39770720005 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39770640004 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39843200009 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39843240001 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39843080009 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39770400008 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39770320007 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. Page 1286 of 4908 Page 5 of 25 39770360009 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39770200004 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39843000005 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39843040007 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39842920005 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39842840004 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39842800002 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39842680002 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39770160102 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. Page 1287 of 4908 Page 6 of 25 39770120003 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39770080004 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39770040002 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39951240003 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39951160109 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39951160002 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39842560009 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39842440006 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39902280009 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. Page 1288 of 4908 Page 7 of 25 39902080005 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39951120000 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39951040009 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39950920007 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39950800004 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39950840006 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39902000001 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39901880002 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39901920001 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. Page 1289 of 4908 Page 8 of 25 39901840000 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39901800008 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39901760009 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39950760005 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39950720003 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39950640002 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39950560001 • Explanation – This parcel would not be able to provide setbacks from Estates zoned lands that are equal to or larger than the selected parcel. 39902000001 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39901880002 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. Page 1290 of 4908 Page 9 of 25 39901920001 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39901840000 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39901800008 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39901760009 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39901600004 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39901640006 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39901560005 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39901520003 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 39901520100 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. Page 1291 of 4908 Page 10 of 25 39901440002 • Explanation – This parcel would not be able to provide setbacks from Estates zoned lands that are equal to or larger than the selected parcel. 39950440008 • Explanation – I attempted to contact the property owner but did not receive a response. We would find ourselves in an identical zoning situation on this parcel as we currently find ourselves. 39950400006 • Explanation – This parcel is developed entirely as a water retention pond. 39901280000 Explanation – This parcel would not be able to provide setbacks from Estates zoned lands that are equal to or larger than the selected parcel. 39901200006 • Explanation – This parcel would not be able to provide setbacks from Estates zoned lands that are equal to or larger than the selected parcel. Therefore, no feasible alternate sites exist along this major road. Page 1292 of 4908 Page 11 of 25 Everglades Blvd, Between Randall Blvd and Oil Well Rd Everglades Blvd Parcel Map This segment of Everglades Blvd consists of 38 qualifying parcels: 39950080002 • Explanation –This parcel does not provide setbacks from existing structures that would be equal to or greater than the parent parcel. 40171120002 • Explanation –This is the parcel that was selected. Page 1293 of 4908 Page 12 of 25 39901000109 • Explanation –I attempted to contact the property owner but did not receive a response. 39901000002 • Explanation –I attempted to contact the property owner but did not receive a response. 40244480006 • Explanation –I attempted to contact the property owner but did not receive a response. 40244440004 • Explanation –I attempted to contact the property owner but did not receive a response. 40244320001 • Explanation –This parcel has inadequate space for the tower site. 40171080003 • Explanation – I attempted to contact the property owner but did not receive a response. 40171000009 • Explanation – I attempted to contact the property owner but did not receive a response. 40170920009 • Explanation – I attempted to contact the property owner but did not receive a response. 40170920106 • Explanation –I attempted to contact the property owner but did not receive a response. 40170840008 • Explanation – This parcel does not provide setbacks from existing structures that would be equal to or greater than the parent parcel. 40170880000 • Explanation – Parcel does not allow setbacks from existing structures No access 40244240000 • Explanation –I attempted to contact the property owner but did not receive a response. 40244200008 • Explanation –I attempted to contact the property owner but did not receive a response. Page 1294 of 4908 Page 13 of 25 40243960006 • Explanation – This parcel does not provide setbacks from existing structures that would be equal to or greater than the parent parcel and lacks a usable access point. 40244000004 • Explanation –I attempted to contact the property owner but did not receive a response. 40170760007 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40170680006 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40170640004 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40170520001 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40243520006 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40243480007 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40243440005 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. Page 1295 of 4908 Page 14 of 25 40243360004 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40243400003 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40170480002 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40170440000 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40170360009 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40170400008 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40170280008 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40170200004 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40243320002 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. Page 1296 of 4908 Page 15 of 25 40243320002 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40243240001 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40243040007 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. Therefore, no feasible alternate sites exist along this major road. Page 1297 of 4908 Page 16 of 25 Everglades Blvd, South of Randall Blvd Everglades Blvd Parcel Map This segment of Everglades Blvd consists of 32 qualifying parcels: 40170160005 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40170080004 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. Page 1298 of 4908 Page 17 of 25 40351400005 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40243000005 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40304200003 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40304160004 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40351320004 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40351280005 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40351000007 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40304120002 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. Page 1299 of 4908 Page 18 of 25 40304000009 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40303920009 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40303960001 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40303880107 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40350960009 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40350600000 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40303800006 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40303760007 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40303720102 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. Page 1300 of 4908 Page 19 of 25 40303720005 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40303680006 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40303640004 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40350560001 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40350200109 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40303520001 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40303560003 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40303440000 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40303480002 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. Page 1301 of 4908 Page 20 of 25 40303400008 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40350160003 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40350120001 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40303360106 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. Therefore, no feasible alternate sites exist along this major road. Page 1302 of 4908 Page 21 of 25 Oil Well Road Oil Well Road Parcel Map Oil Well Road consists of 14 qualifying parcels, within the search ring: 39900880003 • Explanation – This parcel would not be able to provide setbacks from Estates zoned lands that are equal to or larger than the selected parcel. 39900840001 • Explanation – This parcel would not be able to provide setbacks from Estates zoned lands that are equal to or larger than the selected parcel. 39900960004 • Explanation –This is inadequate space on this parcel because it is fully occupied by the parent use. 40010600007 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. Page 1303 of 4908 Page 22 of 25 40010680001 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 73650000102 • Explanation –This parcel is planned to be used for a future right of way expansion. 73650000267 • Explanation –This parcel is within a floodplain. 73650000241 • Explanation –I attempted to contact the property owner but did not receive a response. 73650000063 • Explanation –I attempted to contact the property owner but did not receive a response. 73650000225 • Explanation –I attempted to contact the property owner but did not receive a response. 73650000021 • Explanation –I attempted to contact the property owner but did not receive a response. 73650000283 • Explanation –I attempted to contact the property owner but did not receive a response. 73650000089 • Explanation –I attempted to contact the property owner but did not receive a response. 73650000047 • Explanation –This parcel is within a floodplain. Therefore, no feasible alternate sites exist along this major road. Page 1304 of 4908 Page 23 of 25 Randall Blvd and Sabal Palm Middle School Randall Blvd Parcel Map Page 1305 of 4908 Page 24 of 25 Sabal Palm Parcel Map Randall Blvd consists of 3 qualifying parcels and one potentially qualifying parcel within the search ring: 40243080009 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40243080009 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. 40242960007 • Explanation – This parcel is within the Verizon’s search ring area but outside of AT&T’s search ring area. Therefore, no contact was made as it would not be able to solve AT&T’s gap in service. Page 1306 of 4908 Page 1307 of 4908 Page 1308 of 4908 PROPOSED TOWER LOCATION& WELL FIELD OVERLAYIT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON,UNLESS THEY ARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTIONOF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER,TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.ISSUED FOR:US-FL-5283PALMETTO RIDGE 2TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALSOFFICE: (313) 425-1570TAMPA, FL 336105906 BRECKENRIDGE PARKWAYwww.tepgroup.netSEAL:SHEET TITLE:SHEET NUMBER: REVISION:TEP #:258947.4852518603-17-23NMC3147 31ST AVE. NENAPLES, FL 34120(COLLIER COUNTY)PL20220003008PL20220006738REVISED ZONINGREVISED ZONINGREVISED ZONINGNMCNMCNMCNMCNMC7806-19-2305-07-24SUITE A05-07-24REVISED ZONINGNMCAUW402-03-23REVISED ZONING NMCAUW5 03-07-23Z-1WELL FIELD OVERLAYPage 1309 of 4908 AERIALIT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON,UNLESS THEY ARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTIONOF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER,TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.ISSUED FOR:US-FL-5283PALMETTO RIDGE 2TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALSOFFICE: (313) 425-1570TAMPA, FL 336105906 BRECKENRIDGE PARKWAYwww.tepgroup.netSEAL:SHEET TITLE:SHEET NUMBER: REVISION:TEP #:258947.4852518603-17-23NMC3147 31ST AVE. NENAPLES, FL 34120(COLLIER COUNTY)PL20220003008PL20220006738REVISED ZONINGREVISED ZONINGREVISED ZONINGNMCNMCNMCNMCNMC7806-19-2305-07-24SUITE A05-07-24REVISED ZONINGNMCAUW402-03-23REVISED ZONING NMCAUW5 03-07-23Z-2AERIAL (IMAGERY DATE: 10/2/2022)Page 1310 of 4908 Page 1311 of 4908 Page 1312 of 4908 TOWER ELEVATIONIT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON,UNLESS THEY ARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTIONOF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER,TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.ISSUED FOR:US-FL-5283PALMETTO RIDGE 2TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALSOFFICE: (313) 425-1570TAMPA, FL 336105906 BRECKENRIDGE PARKWAYwww.tepgroup.netSEAL:SHEET TITLE:SHEET NUMBER: REVISION:TEP #:258947.4852518603-17-23NMC3147 31ST AVE. NENAPLES, FL 34120(COLLIER COUNTY)PL20220003008PL20220006738REVISED ZONINGREVISED ZONINGREVISED ZONINGNMCNMCNMCNMCNMC7806-19-2305-07-24SUITE A05-07-24REVISED ZONINGNMCAUW402-03-23REVISED ZONING NMCAUW5 03-07-23Z-5TOWER ELEVATIONTOWER NOTES:Page 1313 of 4908 NOTES:········COMPOUND WALL& GATE DETAILSZ-6WALL REINFORCEMENTGATE STOPPER DETAILGATE DETENT DETAILWALL PLANWALL SIDE ELEVATIONNOTE:TYPICAL WALL ELEVATIONIT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON,UNLESS THEY ARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTIONOF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER,TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.ISSUED FOR:US-FL-5283PALMETTO RIDGE 2TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALSOFFICE: (313) 425-1570TAMPA, FL 336105906 BRECKENRIDGE PARKWAYwww.tepgroup.netSEAL:SHEET TITLE:SHEET NUMBER: REVISION:TEP #:258947.4852518603-17-23NMC3147 31ST AVE. NENAPLES, FL 34120(COLLIER COUNTY)PL20220003008PL20220006738REVISED ZONINGREVISED ZONINGREVISED ZONINGNMCNMCNMCNMCNMC7806-19-2305-07-24SUITE A05-07-24REVISED ZONINGNMCAUW402-03-23REVISED ZONING NMCAUW5 03-07-23Page 1314 of 4908 IT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON,UNLESS THEY ARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTIONOF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER,TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.ISSUED FOR:US-FL-5283PALMETTO RIDGE 2TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALSOFFICE: (313) 425-1570TAMPA, FL 336105906 BRECKENRIDGE PARKWAYwww.tepgroup.netSEAL:SHEET TITLE:SHEET NUMBER: REVISION:TEP #:258947.4852518603-17-23NMC3147 31ST AVE. NENAPLES, FL 34120(COLLIER COUNTY)PL20220003008PL20220006738REVISED ZONINGREVISED ZONINGREVISED ZONINGNMCNMCNMCNMCNMC7806-19-2305-07-24SUITE A05-07-24REVISED ZONINGNMCAUW402-03-23REVISED ZONING NMCAUW5 03-07-23PROPOSEDSIGNAGEZ-7PROPOSED SIGNAGENOTICERadio frequency fields beyondthis point may exceed the FCCgeneral public exposure limit. Obey all posted signs and site guidelinesfor working in radio frequencyenvironments.SITE NAME:SITE NUMBER:FCC TOWER ID:Owned by: BRIDGER TOWER CORPORATIONTelephone: 785 - 764 - 6682NO TRESPASSINGPALMETTO RIDGE 2US-FL-5283US-FL-5283Page 1315 of 4908 IT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON,UNLESS THEY ARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTIONOF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER,TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.ISSUED FOR:US-FL-5283PALMETTO RIDGE 2TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALSOFFICE: (313) 425-1570TAMPA, FL 336105906 BRECKENRIDGE PARKWAYwww.tepgroup.netSEAL:SHEET TITLE:SHEET NUMBER: REVISION:TEP #:258947.4852518603-17-23NMC3147 31ST AVE. NENAPLES, FL 34120(COLLIER COUNTY)PL20220003008PL20220006738REVISED ZONINGREVISED ZONINGREVISED ZONINGNMCNMCNMCNMCNMC7806-19-2305-07-24SUITE A05-07-24REVISED ZONINGNMCAUW402-03-23REVISED ZONINGNMCAUW5 03-07-23FLUCCS MAPZ-8FLUCCS MAPPage 1316 of 4908 1 LauraDeJohnVEN From:Mattaniah Jahn <mjahn@thelawmpowered.com> Sent:Thursday, May 9, 2024 3:42 PM To:LauraDeJohnVEN Cc:Cindy Jean LeBlanc Subject:FW: Bridger - Evergaldes and 31st Ave NE - Follow Up on 02/08/24 NIM (PL20220006738 and PL20220003008) EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Laura, Here’s the response from Ms. Figueroa. Thanks, M Mattaniah S. Jahn, Esq. Firm Practicing in Florida and Georgia Law Office of Mattaniah S. Jahn, PA WE HAVE MOVED! 935 Main Street., Suite C4 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 T: 727.773.2221 F: 727.773.2616 C: 941.685.3770 E: mjahn@thelawmpowered.com FL Bar No: 105256 GA Bar No: 354372 NOTICE: This is privileged and confidential and intended only for those named to receive it. If you are not one of them, then any use, dissemination, distribution, reading, forwarding, printing, or copying of this is strictly prohibited, and you are requested to notify ME immediately by calling me collect at the number above or emailing me at the address above. DISCLAIMER: Although this email and any attachments are believed to be free of any VIRUS or other defect that might affect any computer system into which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and I accept no responsibility for any loss or damage. From: Jessica Fig <jessicasellsnaples@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, May 9, 2024 3:37 PM Page 1317 of 4908 2 To: Mattaniah Jahn <mjahn@thelawmpowered.com> Subject: Re: Bridger - Evergaldes and 31st Ave NE - Follow Up on 02/08/24 NIM (PL20220006738 and PL20220003008) I appreciate you speaking out on our behalf and so happy to see it will not be an eye sore! Thank you! Best Regards, Jessica Figueroa Direct: 239-272-0970 On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 3:20 PM Mattaniah Jahn <mjahn@thelawmpowered.com> wrote: Jessica, I hope you and your family are well. Thank you for your time on the evening of February 8 to discuss the Everglades and 31ST Ave NE. Its taken a little while for me to get all my homework done from the meeting so, just as a refresher, I presented a project for a 184’ tall lattice style communication tower that would support antennas for Verizon and AT&T. You asked for information on RF safety and if we could revise the tower to a tree design, like the tower on Green Blvd down on the Northern edge of Golden Gate City. I said I would try to get a Non-Ionizing Electromagnetic Radiation (NIER) report commissioned for the project and that I would talk with both Bridger Tower Corporation (they will be the tower owner) and Verizon to see if monopine style camouflaging would be possible. Verizon didn’t authorize a full NIER study for the project, but they do want me to share the following link to FCC page on communication tower and wireless device safety for the public. The link for the FCC is: https://www.fcc.gov/engineering-technology/electromagnetic-compatibility-division/radio-frequency- safety/faq/rf-safety. Also, I am please to be able to say that Bridger is changing the design of the project from a lattice to a monopine, like the Green Blvd. Tower. I am attaching copies of the previous photo- simulations of the tower as a lattice, new photo-simulations of the monopine design, and revised plans for the monopine design for your information. I will also forward the simulations and plans to Laura DeJohn (she was the county representative at the meeting) so the application can be revised. I hope I’ve adequately addressed your concerns from the meeting, please let me know if you have any questions. Have a great day. Thanks, Page 1318 of 4908 3 M Mattaniah S. Jahn, Esq. Firm Practicing in Florida and Georgia Law Office of Mattaniah S. Jahn, PA WE HAVE MOVED! 935 Main Street., Suite C4 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 T: 727.773.2221 F: 727.773.2616 C: 941.685.3770 E: mjahn@thelawmpowered.com FL Bar No: 105256 GA Bar No: 354372 NOTICE: This is privileged and confidential and intended only for those named to receive it. If you are not one of them, then any use, dissemination, distribution, reading, forwarding, printing, or copying of this is strictly prohibited, and you are requested to notify ME immediately by calling me collect at the number above or emailing me at the address above. DISCLAIMER: Although this email and any attachments are believed to be free of any VIRUS or other defect that might affect any computer system into which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and I accept no responsibility for any loss or damage. Page 1319 of 4908 Photo Locations Palmetto Ridge 2 (US-FL-5283) 31st Ave NE Naples, FL 34120 Page 1320 of 4908 Self-Support Tower Simulation 184-ft AGL Photo #1 - approx. 1,597’ NNW of site Palmetto Ridge 2 (US-FL-5283) 31st Ave NE Naples, FL 34120 Page 1321 of 4908 Self-Support Tower Simulation 184-ft AGL Photo #2 - approx. 1,180’ NNE of site Palmetto Ridge 2 (US-FL-5283) 31st Ave NE Naples, FL 34120 Page 1322 of 4908 Self-Support Tower Simulation 184-ft AGL Photo #3 - approx. 1,140’ E of site Palmetto Ridge 2 (US-FL-5283) 31st Ave NE Naples, FL 34120 Page 1323 of 4908 Self-Support Tower Simulation 184-ft AGL Photo #4 - approx. 225’ S of site Palmetto Ridge 2 (US-FL-5283) 31st Ave NE Naples, FL 34120 Page 1324 of 4908 Self-Support Tower Simulation 184-ft AGL Photo #5 - approx. 1,578’ SSW of site Palmetto Ridge 2 (US-FL-5283) 31st Ave NE Naples, FL 34120 Page 1325 of 4908 Self-Support Tower Simulation 184-ft AGL Photo #6 - approx. 387’ W of site Palmetto Ridge 2 (US-FL-5283) 31st Ave NE Naples, FL 34120 Page 1326 of 4908 Self-Support Tower Simulation 184-ft AGL Photo #7 - approx. 1,843’ W of site Palmetto Ridge 2 (US-FL-5283) 31st Ave NE Naples, FL 34120 Page 1327 of 4908 Self-Support Tower Simulation 184-ft AGL Photo #8 - approx. 2,955’ NW of site Palmetto Ridge 2 (US-FL-5283) 31st Ave NE Naples, FL 34120 Page 1328 of 4908 Photo Locations Palmetto Ridge 2 (US-FL-5283) 31st Ave NE Naples, FL 34120 Page 1329 of 4908 Monopine Tower Simulation 184-ft AGL Photo #1 - approx. 1,597’ NNW of site Palmetto Ridge 2 (US-FL-5283) 31st Ave NE Naples, FL 34120 Page 1330 of 4908 Monopine Tower Simulation 184-ft AGL Photo #2 - approx. 1,180’ NNE of site Palmetto Ridge 2 (US-FL-5283) 31st Ave NE Naples, FL 34120 Page 1331 of 4908 Monopine Tower Simulation 184-ft AGL Photo #3 - approx. 1,140’ E of site Palmetto Ridge 2 (US-FL-5283) 31st Ave NE Naples, FL 34120 Page 1332 of 4908 Monopine Tower Simulation 184-ft AGL Photo #4 - approx. 225’ S of site Palmetto Ridge 2 (US-FL-5283) 31st Ave NE Naples, FL 34120 Page 1333 of 4908 Monopine Tower Simulation 184-ft AGL Photo #5 - approx. 1,578’ SSW of site Palmetto Ridge 2 (US-FL-5283) 31st Ave NE Naples, FL 34120 Page 1334 of 4908 Monopine Tower Simulation 184-ft AGL Photo #6 - approx. 387’ W of site Palmetto Ridge 2 (US-FL-5283) 31st Ave NE Naples, FL 34120 Page 1335 of 4908 Monopine Tower Simulation 184-ft AGL Photo #7 - approx. 1,843’ W of site Palmetto Ridge 2 (US-FL-5283) 31st Ave NE Naples, FL 34120 Page 1336 of 4908 Monopine Tower Simulation 184-ft AGL Photo #8 - approx. 2,955’ NW of site Palmetto Ridge 2 (US-FL-5283) 31st Ave NE Naples, FL 34120 Page 1337 of 4908 IT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON,UNLESS THEY ARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTIONOF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER,TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.ISSUED FOR:US-FL-5283PALMETTO RIDGE 2TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALSOFFICE: (313) 425-1570TAMPA, FL 336105906 BRECKENRIDGE PARKWAYwww.tepgroup.netSEAL:SHEET TITLE:SHEET NUMBER:REVISION:TEP #:258947.4852518603-17-23NMC3147 31ST AVE. NENAPLES, FL 34120(COLLIER COUNTY)PL20220003008PL20220006738REVISED ZONINGREVISED ZONINGREVISED ZONINGNMCNMCNMCNMCNMC7806-19-2305-07-24SUITE A05-07-24REVISED ZONINGNMCAUW402-03-23REVISED ZONINGNMCAUW503-07-23TITLE SHEETT-1T-1LOCATION MAPNDRIVING DIRECTIONSCONTACT INFORMATIONINDEX OF SHEETSSHEETDESCRIPTIONT1TITLE SHEET1A COORDINATESCONCEPTUAL SITE PLANZ3TOWER ELEVATONZ2COMPOUND DETAIL3147 31ST AVE NE,NAPLES, FL 34120(COLLIER COUNTY)SITE NAME:US-FL-5283PALMETTO RIDGE 2PL20220003008PL20220006738PROJECT INFORMATIONSITE NAME:PROJECT DESCRIPTION:TOWER TYPE:SITE ADDRESS:180' MONOPINE TOWER184' T/LIGHTNING ROD/BRANCHESUS-FL-5283 PALMETTO RIDGE 2AREA OFCONSTRUCTION:LEGAL DESCRIPTION:10,000 ± SQ. FT.TOWER OWNER:BRIDGER TOWER CORPORATION1951 EAST 400TH ROADLECOMPTON, KS 66050DEREK DYE, PRESIDENT(785) 764-6682SITE APPLICANT:ORIGINAL SURVEYOR:CIVIL ENGINEER:TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS, INC.326 TRYON RD.RALEIGH, NC 27603JOSHUA H. CARDEN(919) 661-6351ELECTRICAL ENGINEER:NAME:ADDRESS:CITY, STATE, ZIP:CONTACT:PHONE:PROPERTY OWNER:NAME:ADDRESS:CITY, STATE, ZIP:CONTACT:PHONE:NAME:ADDRESS:CITY, STATE, ZIP:CONTACT:PHONE:NAME:ADDRESS:CITY, STATE, ZIP:CONTACT:PHONE:NAME:ADDRESS:CITY, STATE, ZIP:CONTACT:PHONE:NAME:ADDRESS:CITY, STATE, ZIP:CONTACT:PHONE:W 81° 32' 32.24" (NAD '83) *N 26° 17' 22.0" (NAD '83) *LATITUDE:LONGITUDE:GROUND ELEVATION:SMW ENGINEERING GROUP INC.12979 N TELECOM PARKWAYTAMPA, FL 33637JOHNNY FLASKAMP(813)615-1422GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 68TR 15 OR 1591 PG 5593147 31ST AVE. NENAPLES, FL 34120(COLLIER COUNTY)CODE COMPLIANCE1.INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE(2018 EDITION)2.INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL3.ANSI/TIA/EIA-222-H4.NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE(2017 EDITION)5.CITY/COUNTY ORDINANCES6. IBC 2020 WINDZONE CODECALL FOR UNDERGROUNDUTILITIES PRIOR TO DIGGING(800) 424-5555EMERGENCY:CALL 911UTILITIES:POWER COMPANY:ADDRESS:CONTACT:PHONE:TELEPHONE COMPANY:CONTACT:PHONE:LAW OFFICE:T.B.D.UNKNOWNUNKNOWNAGENT OF RECORDFLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO751 39TH AVE NE, NAPLES, FL 34120CUSTOMER SERVICE(239) 262-13228REVPROJECT DESCRIPTION & NOTESCONSTRUCTION OF A TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITY, CONSISTING OFANTENNAS & ASSOCIATED APPURTENANCES ON A PROPOSED MONOPINETOWER, FENCED COMPOUND & SERVICE EQUIPMENT FOR FUTURE CARRIERS. NOWATER OR SEWER IS REQUIRED.1.FACILITY DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH COLLIER COUNTY REGULATIONS.2.THIS IS AN UNMANNED FACILITY WHICH WILL NOT REQUIRE ANY WATER ORSEWER FACILITIES.3.TRAFFIC WILL CONSIST ONLY OF MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL, VISITING THESITE APPROXIMATELY TWICE A MONTH.DRIVING SOUTH ON I-75 TAKE EXIT 111 TO IMMOKALEE RD. STAY IMMOKALEE RDFOR 13.2 MILES. TURN RIGHT ONTO RANDALL BLVD AND STAY ON FOR 3.4 MILES.TURN LEFT ONTO EVERGLADES BLVD. THEN TURN RIGHT ONTO 31ST AVE NE.THEN THE SITE WILL BE ON THE LEFT HAND SIDE OF THE ROAD.MATTANIAH S. JAHN, PA935 MAIN ST, SUITE C4SAFETY HARBOR, FL 56 34695MATTANIAH JAHN(727) 773-2221PARCEL #:40171120002ZONING:E - ESTATES* INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE FORM OF A 1A CERTIFICATION BY SMWENGINEERING GROUP, INC. DATED MAY 5, 2022.ZONING JURISDICTION:COLLIER COUNTYZ1PROPOSED TELECOMMUNICATIONSFACILITY15.4" (NAVD '88) *Z4AREA PLANTOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS, INC.326 TRYON RD.RALEIGH, NC 27603JOSHUA H. CARDEN(919)661-6351CARLOS J. MERAW202 GOLDEN GATE BLVD WESTNAPLES, FL 34120CARLOS J. MERAW(239) 825-3231SIGNAGEZ5ALL WORK & MATERIALS SHALL BE PERFORMED AND INSTALLED INACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWINGCODES AS ADOPTED BY THE LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES.NOTHING IN THESE PLANS IS TO BE CONSTRUED TO PERMIT WORKNOT CONFORMING TO THE LATEST EDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWING:SITEPROPOSED TOWER LOCATION & WELL FIELD LOCATIONFENCE DETAILSZ6Z78888888FLUCCS BIOLOGIST TRANSECTSZ88Page 1338 of 4908 PROPOSED TOWER LOCATION& WELL FIELD OVERLAYIT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON,UNLESS THEY ARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTIONOF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER,TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.ISSUED FOR:US-FL-5283PALMETTO RIDGE 2TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALSOFFICE: (313) 425-1570TAMPA, FL 336105906 BRECKENRIDGE PARKWAYwww.tepgroup.netSEAL:SHEET TITLE:SHEET NUMBER:REVISION:TEP #:258947.4852518603-17-23NMC3147 31ST AVE. NENAPLES, FL 34120(COLLIER COUNTY)PL20220003008PL20220006738REVISED ZONINGREVISED ZONINGREVISED ZONINGNMCNMCNMCNMCNMC7806-19-2305-07-24SUITE A05-07-24REVISED ZONINGNMCAUW402-03-23REVISED ZONINGNMCAUW503-07-23Z-1WELL FIELD OVERLAYPage 1339 of 4908 AERIALIT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON,UNLESS THEY ARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTIONOF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER,TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.ISSUED FOR:US-FL-5283PALMETTO RIDGE 2TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALSOFFICE: (313) 425-1570TAMPA, FL 336105906 BRECKENRIDGE PARKWAYwww.tepgroup.netSEAL:SHEET TITLE:SHEET NUMBER:REVISION:TEP #:258947.4852518603-17-23NMC3147 31ST AVE. NENAPLES, FL 34120(COLLIER COUNTY)PL20220003008PL20220006738REVISED ZONINGREVISED ZONINGREVISED ZONINGNMCNMCNMCNMCNMC7806-19-2305-07-24SUITE A05-07-24REVISED ZONINGNMCAUW402-03-23REVISED ZONINGNMCAUW503-07-23Z-2AERIAL (IMAGERY DATE: 10/2/2022)Page 1340 of 4908 CONCEPTUALSITE PLANIT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON,UNLESS THEY ARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTIONOF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER,TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.ISSUED FOR:US-FL-5283PALMETTO RIDGE 2TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALSOFFICE: (313) 425-1570TAMPA, FL 336105906 BRECKENRIDGE PARKWAYwww.tepgroup.netSEAL:SHEET TITLE:SHEET NUMBER:REVISION:TEP #:258947.4852518603-17-23NMC3147 31ST AVE. NENAPLES, FL 34120(COLLIER COUNTY)PL20220003008PL20220006738REVISED ZONINGREVISED ZONINGREVISED ZONINGNMCNMCNMCNMCNMC7806-19-2305-07-24SUITE A05-07-24REVISED ZONINGNMCAUW402-03-23REVISED ZONINGNMCAUW503-07-23Z-3CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN31ST AVENUE NELEGEND1-A COORDINATESTOWER SETBACKSNOTES:SOUTH BOUND LANESEVERGLADES BOULEVARD NMOSQUITO CONTROL NOTES:RESIDENTIAL SEPARATIONSRESIDENTIAL SETBACK NOTE:Page 1341 of 4908 Page 1342 of 4908 TOWER ELEVATIONIT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON,UNLESS THEY ARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTIONOF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER,TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.ISSUED FOR:US-FL-5283PALMETTO RIDGE 2TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALSOFFICE: (313) 425-1570TAMPA, FL 336105906 BRECKENRIDGE PARKWAYwww.tepgroup.netSEAL:SHEET TITLE:SHEET NUMBER:REVISION:TEP #:258947.4852518603-17-23NMC3147 31ST AVE. NENAPLES, FL 34120(COLLIER COUNTY)PL20220003008PL20220006738REVISED ZONINGREVISED ZONINGREVISED ZONINGNMCNMCNMCNMCNMC7806-19-2305-07-24SUITE A05-07-24REVISED ZONINGNMCAUW402-03-23REVISED ZONINGNMCAUW503-07-23Z-5TOWER ELEVATIONTOWER NOTES:Page 1343 of 4908 NOTES:········COMPOUND WALL& GATE DETAILSZ-6WALL REINFORCEMENTGATE STOPPER DETAILGATE DETENT DETAILWALL PLANWALL SIDE ELEVATIONNOTE:TYPICAL WALL ELEVATIONIT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON,UNLESS THEY ARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTIONOF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER,TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.ISSUED FOR:US-FL-5283PALMETTO RIDGE 2TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALSOFFICE: (313) 425-1570TAMPA, FL 336105906 BRECKENRIDGE PARKWAYwww.tepgroup.netSEAL:SHEET TITLE:SHEET NUMBER:REVISION:TEP #:258947.4852518603-17-23NMC3147 31ST AVE. NENAPLES, FL 34120(COLLIER COUNTY)PL20220003008PL20220006738REVISED ZONINGREVISED ZONINGREVISED ZONINGNMCNMCNMCNMCNMC7806-19-2305-07-24SUITE A05-07-24REVISED ZONINGNMCAUW402-03-23REVISED ZONINGNMCAUW503-07-23Page 1344 of 4908 IT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON,UNLESS THEY ARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTIONOF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER,TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.ISSUED FOR:US-FL-5283PALMETTO RIDGE 2TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALSOFFICE: (313) 425-1570TAMPA, FL 336105906 BRECKENRIDGE PARKWAYwww.tepgroup.netSEAL:SHEET TITLE:SHEET NUMBER:REVISION:TEP #:258947.4852518603-17-23NMC3147 31ST AVE. NENAPLES, FL 34120(COLLIER COUNTY)PL20220003008PL20220006738REVISED ZONINGREVISED ZONINGREVISED ZONINGNMCNMCNMCNMCNMC7806-19-2305-07-24SUITE A05-07-24REVISED ZONINGNMCAUW402-03-23REVISED ZONINGNMCAUW503-07-23PROPOSEDSIGNAGEZ-7PROPOSED SIGNAGENOTICERadio frequency fields beyondthis point may exceed the FCCgeneral public exposure limit. Obey all posted signs and site guidelinesfor working in radio frequencyenvironments.SITE NAME:SITE NUMBER:FCC TOWER ID:Owned by: BRIDGER TOWER CORPORATIONTelephone: 785 - 764 - 6682NO TRESPASSINGPALMETTO RIDGE 2US-FL-5283US-FL-5283Page 1345 of 4908 IT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON,UNLESS THEY ARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTIONOF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER,TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.ISSUED FOR:US-FL-5283PALMETTO RIDGE 2TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALSOFFICE: (313) 425-1570TAMPA, FL 336105906 BRECKENRIDGE PARKWAYwww.tepgroup.netSEAL:SHEET TITLE:SHEET NUMBER:REVISION:TEP #:258947.4852518603-17-23NMC3147 31ST AVE. NENAPLES, FL 34120(COLLIER COUNTY)PL20220003008PL20220006738REVISED ZONINGREVISED ZONINGREVISED ZONINGNMCNMCNMCNMCNMC7806-19-2305-07-24SUITE A05-07-24REVISED ZONINGNMCAUW402-03-23REVISED ZONINGNMCAUW503-07-23FLUCCS MAPZ-8FLUCCS MAPPage 1346 of 4908 Page 1347 of 4908 Page 1 of 19 NIM – 2/8/2024 – Summary of Recording – Time started - 6:00 P.M. Mattaniah S. Jahn: Ok. Good evening, everybody. I’m Mattaniah Jahn. I’m a Zoning Land use attorney based out of Safety Harbor, Florida, and I work on cell tower projects. Before we go any further I just need to let you know that by County regulations I have to record this meeting. So we have the recording turned on up there and I have a back up mic over here. Anyways this is a neighborhood information meeting for a project that we call Palmetto Ridge, that I call Palmetto Ridge II. It’s actually located near 31st Street NE and Everglades Boulevard. What we’re having tonight is a Neighborhood Information Meeting. Man: Excuse me, 31st Street or 31st Avenue? Mattaniah S. Jahn: 31st Ave., my apologies. Man: Big difference. Mattaniah S. Jahn: Alright so, before we start, I have a disclosure to read to you from the County Administrative Code. The County has put forth rules of decorum. The purpose and intent of Neighborhood Information Meeting Ordinance is to provide the public with notice of the impending land use petition and to foster communication between the petitioner, me, and the public. To promote increased participation and convenience to the interested members of the public, all NIM’s shall be conducted at a physical location, where we are tonight at Big Corksrew Park Community Center, and then also provided over the internet via video conferencing. I’m sorry I started my week in Covington, Georgia. Anyways, so there’s two ways to attend. You have all chosen to be here in person. The expectation is that all NIM attendees will conduct themselves in such a manner as their presence will not interfere with the orderly progress of the meeting. The petitioner is encouraged to buy licensed, qualified security detail for in person meetings, which will be at the petitioner’s expense. If the petitioner or staff determines that the NIM cannot be completed due to the disorderly conduct of the members of the public. I don’t think that’s going to happen tonight. The petitioner shall have the right to adjourn the NIM but will be required to conduct another newly advertised NIM either in person or via video conferencing technology or both at the petitioner’s discretion. Now I’m going to go into why I’m taking up part of your evening, if that’s ok. This is a project for 184’ tall lattice style communication tower at 31st Avenue and Everglades. Just to go into a primer for why the tower is needed. I’m sure I’m telling you stuff that you already know. There’s a lot of development that’s been happening out in east Collier County in the estates, traffic over the wireless networks has increased. And also, we use our phones in different places. For example, my father was a traveling salesman in Sarasota/Manatee County and he used to take and stop at the payphone every so often when he could find one. Check in with my mother while I was young and growing up. That later turned into him having a cell phone, right. And that’s where we used them when we were out in cars and such on major roads. And then as it went along we started using them in more places. Now we use them in our homes in place of wired line connections and different devices connect to the network. So smart watches, those connect to the network, and take space on the network. This tablet right here has the ability to connect to the Page 1348 of 4908 Page 2 of 19 network and run off of it. And we really use our wireless network, our cellular network, as our way to connect for our personal use, business use, education, and of course 911 purposes. Alright, let’s go forwards. So, not what I’ve gone through the basics, obviously there’s a lack of coverage out in the estates. I don’t think anyone doubts that. Man: *inaudible* Mattaniah S. Jahn: And then of course with all the people moving in, just like with how the roads are getting bogged down with traffic, it also happens on the cellular network. The cell towers function just like roads. They have so much traffic that they can take. We call it capacity and as you load them up with more and more connections you burden them just like the roads you travel every day around the county. Next. So, half of the challenge with putting in, at least on the eastern side of Collier County, is setting up coverage and the other half is setting ahead of the traffic. You don’t want to take and run out of capacity on towers because then you can’t take new connections. You may have noticed that when you go to call, and you go straight to voicemail. Or if you’re just going along and you get a “beep, beep, beep” sometimes that’s because you have a weak signal, but if you got four bars that’s because the tower no longer has the capacity to keep you call going. If you’re navigating and the map starts spinning, the tower lost capacity usually in those instances. Next. So, Considerations when placing a tower. In order for it to it’s job all towers are inherently local to the area that they serve and they have to be spread out. So just like the lights in this room. You have a room that has these 2 foot square lights all around it. If I were to take and put all the lights on that end of the room, like how I have the ones that are turned on right now. The area (I should not get away from the microphone, I’ve done that in the past). The area in the back gets dark. So you have to spread them out if you want to evenly light the room. Alright, so next you have to take into account balancing that and neighboring properties. In the estates the way that code currently defaults doing that (Mattaniah paused while new guests entered and got settled in). Mattaniah S. Jahn: So, currently the county code ideally you’d be able to provide two and a half times tower height separation from the nearest property that’s residential. That’s not the case in the estates because for as far as the eye can see the lots are all too small in order to provide that separation. So, in the estates the way the code directs us is to parcels that have frontage along, that abut major roads like Everglades Boulevard. And you always obviously look for the biggest parcel you can find. Man: *inaudible* Mattaniah S. Jahn: Yes, it is. Next, Please. The other thing and I went a little bit out of order because I started with “located near the traffic source” all towers are local. And you can see it with this room, you know? The lights on the front half the room are off to allow my projector to work. Page 1349 of 4908 Page 3 of 19 If we turn those lights on the room’s evenly lit. If we move the lights over to the other end. Like how we just did by essentially turning off the lights, only part of the room is way. The last thing to keep in mind is that the towers work together as a network. I grew up in a radio station in Sarasota. And from City Island in Sarasota, that tower could reach, send music out to people, to Saint Petersburg to the north and Venice to the south. So about 30- 40 miles in either direction, because it's just sending music to a car radio or to a house radio. But because cell phones, essentially function almost like, they’re like a smart walkie talkie really. A cell tower can't reach that far. And I'll have propagation maps to show you the coverage. Man: *inaudible* Mattaniah S. Jahn: Correct. Here is an aerial from Google Earth, just showing the area around the parent parcel and on our parent parcel where the tower will be located is 3147 31st Avenue Northeast. I have put an orange arrow over it. There's currently a house on the western side. You can see to the north running east west we have Oil Well Road. And then in the middle of running north south, we have Everglades Boulevard. Next, please. This is just a closer view. Next, please. And this is closer. This was before the house was constructed. I have another aerial that shows the house that’s on the parent parcel. And like I said before, the tower is going to be centered on the eastern side of the parent parcel. Next, please. What’s proposed? Next.184 ft. tall lattice style tower and the lattice tower has ironworks that support it. It’s see through. You can look through it. It doesn't have guyed wires extending out of them. There will be antennas mounted on the upper end of the tower. This will be designed so that way it can collocate up to 4 users. They can collocate multiple users starting first with Verizon Wireless because they're the ones who are trying to solve a gap in their service to everyone in this area. AT&T also has interest in collocating on the tower underneath Verizon. Man: There are no others. Mattaniah S. Jahn: Right now, no. But in the Estates, towers that are built are basically expected to attract most, if not all carriers. There's only four carriers in the US, so that would leave T-mobile. Man: Who are they? Name them for me. Page 1350 of 4908 Page 4 of 19 Mattaniah S. Jahn: Yes. So, the four national carriers, that pretty much all your other cellular services work off of, they just might rebrand their signal are Verizon Wireless, AT&T, T-Mobile, and Dish Wireless. You may remember the name Sprint from back in the day, they actually merged with T-Mobile, and as part of that, because the FCC considers the cellular network to basically be infrastructure and they want a competitive market. They didn't allow the merger. They only allowed the merger once Dish was ready to join the market, so that way there would be more competitors. We’re going for a Conditional Use process. We are requesting a waiver from the 2.5 times tower height separation to the north side to the east side and the south side of the tower. The next parcel to the West, not the house that's on the parent parcel. If that was a separate property, it would be subject to a waiver just like this one. So, it's similar distance of the landlord's property. But the next parcel is on the other side of Everglades Boulevard and that direction does meet the 2.5 times tower height separation. I'm not asking for any other variances from the County’s code. That's all I'm asking for. Man: So explain that again, what is the variance you’re asking for? Mattaniah S. Jahn: I'm asking for a waiver, as part of a conditional use, and it's to reduce the 2.5 times tower height residential separation to the north of the tower, to the east of the tower, and to the south of the tower. Man: Is this your only project in Collier County? 2nd Man: Not even close. … Laura DeJohn: I’m here on behalf of Collier County. Doing the Zoning Review, I’m required here to make sure things go smooth. The main thing I just want to mention is this is recorded and the Planning Commission wants to hear what goes on in the Neighborhood Meeting we need, like it's a small group. It's cool to just ask questions, but for the record, please say your name and and say your question as loud as you can. So anyone listening to this in three or four or five months understands what is going on. OK? Tim Porter: Yeah, my name is Tim Porter. I live in the area. Is this your only project in Collier County? Mattaniah S. Jahn: This is Mattaniah Jahn, and no, I have other tower projects in Collier County. Tim Porter: How many? Mattaniah S. Jahn: I don't have an accurate count right now. Tim Porter: I've seen a lot of notices in the paper for variances on cell towers throughout the county and I just wondering what's going on. Page 1351 of 4908 Page 5 of 19 Mattaniah S. Jahn: At least for my perspective as someone who works in the tower industry. What's happened is for the longest time the Estates really wasn't connected to the cellular grid. And recently the carriers have been trying to construct in the Estates to provide wireless service as the population in the Estates has increased. Tim Porter: So let me ask you another question, and I'll rephrase my original question. How many of your projects are in the Estates? Mattaniah S. Jahn: I have at least one other project that is within Estate's platting, and I've done at least one other project before this that was within the Estates zoning, OK? Tim Porter: Now how will this project improve access to the internet? Mattaniah S. Jahn: So it will. It will actually allow you to achieve an internet connection. Tim Porter: If you have a cell phone provider? Mattaniah S. Jahn: Correct. Tim Porter: You have two open spots. You have no prospects? Mattaniah S. Jahn: Not right now, there may be negotiations going on above my head. But right now, the carriers that have shown interest and provided documentation are Verizon Wireless, they're the ones who are holding Bridger Tower Corporation’s hand through the process. They need it that badly. And then also AT&T, who has provided a letter, saying if this gets constructed, we'd like to go on. Man: Would you like to save questions for the end or do you want to have us keep interrupt you because I have a ton of questions? And they’re related to yours, but I don't wanna get to the end here and then have somebody say this meeting’s over. Mattaniah S. Jahn: No, I'll be entertaining questions at the end, and I might be able to answer some of your questions just by completing my presentation. And I apologize. There is going to be a lighting requirement. There will be red lights on the tower. There is a scrivenor’s error on that slide. Woman: Will you clarify? Is it lighting… Mattaniah S. Jahn: Correct. The Collier County Mosquito Control requires that we put red marker lights on any tower that's over 150ft. They have something called Fresnel lenses. If that name sounds familiar, we learned about Fresnel in high school. He had the prism lenses they had been using in the lighthouses since the 1800’s and that points the life out and upwards towards the aircraft. Next please. Next. Next. All right, so I'm just gonna show a couple of sheets from the site plan. If you want full copy. Page 1352 of 4908 Page 6 of 19 Please email me. I have business cards and I can send you a full copy of the plans or contact Miss DeJohn. She has the county's copy of the plans and all the other documents that I've given to the County. First, I have an aerial sheet and unfortunately, the engineer chose to draw the black lines because that's just the way engineers like to do these things. But you can see the parcel that the tower is on is this rectangle and you can see Everglades Boulevard going north-south and 31st Avenue, Northeast going East West. You can see the house on the western side and on the eastern side, you can see two squares. The outer squares. The edge of what would be the landscape buffer around the tower. The inner square is the equipment compound. The equipment compound is a space that is walled off with an 8 ft. Tall concrete block wall that will either be block or be precast, like what you see around subdivisions. Outside of that is a landscape buffer. Inside of that are cabinets like what you see controlling traffic lights. Those cameras have the computers that run the antennas and radios at the top. And then there's also usually a backup generator inside a sound dampening box that meets your Noise Ordinance. And for those times when the power goes out. These facilities aren't staffed. They're completely automated. So, they don't generate any meaningful traffic. One trip per carrier per month in a pickup truck size vehicle is my rule of thumb. Because back in the day before these were fully automated, and they actually reported back, they report diagnostics back to the control centers, the technicians were required by federal law to come out and inspect. Now we're able to monitor them remotely. So, I stick with the one trip per carrier month because they actually come out less often than that. Next please. And this Orange arrow points to the equipment compound, and you see the triangle inside that. That is where the lattice would be located. Next please. This is sheet Z3 of our plans, and it shows the parent parcel. And that's the dark black line that you see. It actually goes underneath 31st Avenue Northeast and Everglades Boulevard. Pretty much all the street in the Estates are easement roads instead of fee simple right of way, meaning the county knows the dirt. You can see on the left-hand side the house. And on the right-hand side is the equipment compound I was talking about. You can see a gray outline box. That's the landscape buffer that's located on what that's required under the code. Next to that would be the wall and then inside there, you can see the upper left- hand corner is T Mobile's equipment pad. It's a space where you can put the cabinets, and you can also see that there's enough space in there, that if four carriers collocate on the tower, they all have space to put their compound equipment at the base. You can also see the driveway extending south from the compound to 31st Avenue. The other thing that this towers designed with is 130 ft Fall Zone Radius and a Falls Zone Radius means that if the tower were to structurally fail, it would actually fold over upon itself and be contained on the parent parcel. Page 1353 of 4908 Page 7 of 19 This tower would be designed for the 2023 Florida building codes, the latest revision that we have and also the national it's called the TIA-EIA code. That’s the national standard for communication towers and and then also your radio infrastructure. So it would be compliant with both of those codes. And it will be designed for the wind zones in Collier County. Next. This is an elevation of what a lattice looks like. This is what this lattice would look like. And you can see it gets narrow as we go up, but at the very top is where Verizon's antennas would be. And the down below that is where you'll end up seeing AT&T’s antennas and antennas for anybody else who collocates on the tower. The tower will be all gray and then, of course, it has those red lights in the evening because of mosquito control. Next, please. This is just a sheet showing that the concrete wall that will be around the base of the communication tower that keeps it secure, it hides the equipment, it's required by the county and federal law, there's a fence. You won't be able to see through the wall. Next, please. That's a picture of a lattice that exists currently. Next, please. And I'll just run through photo simulations. All right. I'm gonna run clockwise around the site. Starting with the intersection of Everglades Boulevard and Oil Well Road. This is the view from Oil Well and Everglades and the tower is the gray structure that you see in the middle peeking up over top the Brazillian peppers. Next, please. This is from 33rd Avenue Northeast. So you go south a couple more blocks, and you can see there's a clearer view of it. On the base of the tower is… **Brief interruption as a new citizen enters and gets settled in.** This is from 33rd Avenue and the base of the tower is obscured by trees, and you can see the trees that are on the property in front of us would be able to block it. And when there aren’t trees, there is visability. This is down 31st Avenue Northeast looking west. And you can see the tower is poking out of the tree line a little bit taller than the power poles. This is the shot from essentially the driveway for the tower. It's a little bit off to the right of it, so 31st Avenue northeast from the front of the property. This is your clearest visibility of the tower. This is from Everglades and 29th Avenue Northeast. Man: Did you Photoshop this? Page 1354 of 4908 Page 8 of 19 Mattaniah S. Jahn: Yes Woman: It's not there now. Mattaniah S. Jahn: Correct. These are photo stimulations. A simulation is basically geometry applied. I’m going to simplify this or people that do photo simulations are going to be mad at me. But basically geometry that's applied to photos. There's a couple of ways to do it. You can either fly a balloon and take pictures and superimpose a picture of a tower over it. Or you can take an established reference objects in your view shed and your distance from them, and I apologize. I said geometry, it's probably actually calculus. I became a lawyer because I don’t like to do math things. But then I got into one of the math-ier practices of law. Um, but with that, you can set your scale. So, that's how these are prepared. Laura DeJohn, Collier County: So you can point out that the top left is the true today and they’re showing you… Man: Yeah, I used to work for…I’m a building inspector. David Pfaff: Yeah. Based on the reference points, you can calculate height and things. Mattaniah S. Jahn: All right. So, um, that commenter was David Pfaff. This is the intersection of Everglades and 31st. And you can see the property owner ’s house in the foreground and what the lattice will look like in the background. This was actually produced using a balloon and you can see the balloon on the upper lefthand corner. Next, please. This is from 31st Avenue west of Everglades, looking back east. You can see as you go away objects get smaller and they scale down, so in the upper left hand corner you have the picture of the balloon that was flown and down in the middle you have a picture of the tower. Next, please. And then this is from Oil Well Road specifically, there's a church campus there looking back. Woman: I'm sorry because I came in late. Where exactly is the tower going be placed? Mattaniah S. Jahn: It will be on a parcel that's at the intersection of Everglades Boulevard and 31st Avenue Northeast. Woman: Ok. Mattaniah S. Jahn: Coverage maps. Because there's no point in doing any of this or taking any of your time without actually providing wireless service. Basically Verizon has been trying to provide… Woman: Yes! Mattaniah S. Jahn: …service to the Estates since before towers were really allowed in the Estates. They actually were trying to originally reach in from the agricultural lands out to the East. Weren't Page 1355 of 4908 Page 9 of 19 able to find anything out that way and candidly the signal would not, the capacity signal that takes the traffic, would not be able to reach far enough. That's before we get talking about Town of Big Cyprus burdening the cellular network in the future. Woman: Oh yeah. Mattaniah S. Jahn: So this shows all the towers that are around our area, so you can see in the middle there's a black dot that all the red arrows are pointing to. That is our proposed tower and then you can see dots all the way around with A through I. Those are Verizon towers. They range about five to six miles away. We have a couple to the west that are in the three-mile range. So that's what's currently trying to serve you right now. And they're not doing the job. Woman: No, it's absolutely awful. Mattaniah S. Jahn: I have an orange arrow pointing to where the proposed tower will be. Next, please. This is Verizon's current coverage that is shown. (inaudible conversation in the background) So what they do is they can model basically how their signal propagates. Red is reliable, green is unreliable. That's how they set up their parameters. Man: **inaudible** Woman: Other way around, reliable is green. Mattaniah S. Jahn: I'm sorry. Green is reliable. Red is unreliable. My apologies for my misstatement. Um so anyways, green is reliable and red is unreliable. You can see that there's a scattering of signal heading down south of Oil Well Road, but not a whole lot. There's also a yellow dot off to the Southwest. That's another tower called Golden Gate Boat that was put up recently. You were asking about receiving notices and the like, you may have actually received a letter from I don't know that might be outside the range. Man: What was it called? Mattaniah S. Jahn: But that was another project in the Estates. I was not part of it. That's part of Verizon's overall effort to try to serve the estates Woman: Did that just go up or? Mattaniah S. Jahn: I believe it hasn't actually been constructed yet. Woman: I was going to say because my grandparents are on that side and they have horrible service. Man: What was the third word in the name? Mattaniah S. Jahn: Golden Gate Boat. Man: Boat? Page 1356 of 4908 Page 10 of 19 Mattaniah S. Jahn: Yes, I don't know why they end up with a name like Boat. **inaudible** Mattaniah S. Jahn: I don't have the address. Laura DeJohn, Collier County: I think it's 1680 Golden Gate Boulevard East Man: So are we forgetting about the one they just built on Benton Road? 500’ from the other one. Mattaniah S. Jahn: I was involved in that one. Um, and that one can't reach up this far. Man: I'm not worried about that one. You continue. **inaudible** Mattaniah S. Jahn: Okay. Next. So the orange arrow points to the proposed tower. Next, please. And then you can see the proposed coverage. And you can see that the the signal that they use for picking up traffic capacity just doesn't travel that far. So to the East you reach to out about the Estates, the edge of the Estates. To the West, you're making it about to the edge of the communities that are built around this park, the big platted subdivisions. And then going south, you get about as far south as Randall Boulevard. Next. And then also this is showing Golden Gate Boat, the other tower that Verizon’s been working on. It's ahead of us in this All right. Next. So just to go through the process, we are requesting a Conditional Use and a Variance. And I apologize. I misspoke earlier saying that the setback reduction was a Conditional Use Waiver. It is a Variance. Staff is reviewing the application. Miss DeJohn has been unfortunately stuck with putting up with me for the staff reviews and going through and pointing out where things need to be better. Um, hopefully we will be wrapping that up soon. And then, um, tonight we're having this Neighborhood Information Meeting, but we're talking. That had mailed public notice and a newspaper app. After this after this meeting, and after the last of the comments are resolved. This will ultimately be set for a hearing before your Planning Commission. And then your Board of County Commissioners, so two hearings. Each hearing will be publicly noticed, and you'll be able to come and participate and speak. There will be mailed notice like the letter that you got, um for this meeting, except it will come from the County. And then there will also be a newspaper ad. And in addition to that, there'll be a four by eight wood sign on the property giving information as well as contact information for Ms. DeJohn and I believe also myself. Page 1357 of 4908 Page 11 of 19 The Planning Commission makes a recommendation. The Board of County Commissioners makes the final decision. Contact information. Collier County Growth Management Staff The assigned planner who has to unfortunately has to put up with me through this project is Laura DeJohn. Her information is shown here. Her phone number is 239-252-5587 Her email address is Laura, L-A-U-R-A, dot DeJohn, D-E-J-O-H-N, at Collier County F-L dot gov and I am Mattaniah Jahn. … Mattaniah is spelled M-A-T-T-A-N-I-A-H. My last name is Jahn, J-A-H-N. My phone number is 727-773-2221. And then my email address is M-J-A-H-N at -T-H-E-L-A-W, the letter M, P-O-W- E-R-E-D dot com. It should read as mjahn@thelawmpowered.com. All right, so that includes my presentation. And now we're going to move into the question section. And I would ask you to take turns. If you just raise your hand, we'll just go one at a time. I’ll start with this gentleman here with the Marines hat. Vito J. Congine, Jr.: Hi, my name is Vito Congine. I live on 31st Ave NE Mattaniah S. Jahn: All right. Vito J. Congine, Jr.: First of all, so the person that’s looking to lease for $1000 a month or whatever you’re going to pay again, does he live here or is he from another state? Mattaniah S. Jahn: So he built this house for his daughter. Vito J. Congine, Jr.: Does he realize that our rf waves do cause cancer and the recommended distance is 12-1300 feet away, which is just roughly over a quarter of a mile. And actually published stories have been done that suggest a half a mile is better if you have underlying conditions such as electrical or hypersensitivity to radio frequency waves. Mattaniah S. Jahn: So as far as that goes, I mean, you can find a lot of stuff on the internet but cell towers don’t create radiation like what you're thinking. Vito J. Congine, Jr.: And who determines that? The cell tower company? Because the FCC has stopped doing any studies on this since 1990. Now they have to be done by third parties. Mattaniah S. Jahn: Actually, the FCC re-evaluated its rules for RF standards in 2019 and decided to maintain to keep them the same. Vito J. Congine, Jr.: Yeah, well, let’s see, it says right here, 1990 or 2018 National Environmental Health Science did a toxicology program found that in fact, there is evidence of cancer causing from cell phone and cell tower radiation. Mattaniah S. Jahn: So the American Cancer Society and the W-H-O disagree with you. They’re more… Page 1358 of 4908 Page 12 of 19 Vito J. Congine, Jr.: We just lost the…Another Cancer Society, Environmental Health Sciences, National Toxicology Program, and there are several others but we won’t get into all those. I’m just letting everybody know. Woman: I will state that as an RN that is actually true that cell phones can cause cancer. When you have them, they tell you not to sleep with them in your room because of the that the radiation. Vito J. Congine, Jr.: *inaudible* Mattaniah S. Jahn: I'm not here to make any statements about… Vito J. Congine, Jr.: I’m just letting you know. That’s what everybody here should be aware, okay? The 1300 foot rule. Now the tower is going to be an eyesore. That will drop your property value by a minimum of 15%. That’s been proven. Mattaniah S. Jahn: Do you have other questions for? Vito J. Congine, Jr.: Yes. Is there a insurance policy that you're going to provide long term? Mattaniah S. Jahn: Yes, so Bridger and, T Mobile maintain insurance on their facilities. Vito J. Congine, Jr.: For health insurance? For people who have claims against them? Mattaniah S. Jahn: There are there is insurance on their property, for, like you would have for any other business. Vito J. Congine, Jr.: So no health insurance? **inaudible background** Unknown Person: You keep mentioning T-Mobile, but here you’re telling us this is a Verizon tower. Mattaniah S. Jahn: My apologies. It is Verizon. So Bridger and Verizon have they each have insurance on the tower. Vito J. Congine, Jr.: Okay. Another question. Why here on this parcel instead of by the open woods?**inaudible Mattaniah S. Jahn: So before I answer that question, I’m going to ask the room if anybody else has any questions since we've had … questions from you. Man: How much is the owner going to get a month from Verizon for leasing the space. For example and is the county getting any additional tax revenue because of building up, big improvements on the project. Mattaniah S. Jahn: Yeah. So, as far as lease terms. I can't go into them and keep my job and my BAR license unfortunately. Verizon doesn't pay the property owner directly. Verizon pays Bridger Tower Corporation that will construct and maintain the tower and they in turn, pay a land lease to the property owner. As far as tax revenue, whenever you build anything on land it's usually taxed by the Property Appraiser. I'd have to double check with Collier County's Property Appraiser, but Page 1359 of 4908 Page 13 of 19 when that tax is assessed Bridger’s responsible. If you want I can take and look that up after the meeting and run it to ground. This gentleman over here in the green hat. Tim Porter: Tim Porter speaking again. You never answered his question a while ago is the property owner absent or does his daughter live there or? Mattaniah S. Jahn: So the property owner's daughter lives on the property. The property owner himself I understand to be local to this part of Florida. Tim Porter: 5G network, you bringing that in on it? Mattaniah S. Jahn: All communication towers are 5G now. … **inaudible** Unknown Person: Tell me about 5G. Doesn't the signal require closer interval? You have to be like, what is the interval? Mattaniah S. Jahn: 5G signal. That means the fifth generation of… Unknown Person: They just gone down the street. I live on 33rd Avenue Northeast on the other side of the canal and they've gone down my street with that wiring for 5G. How close, how far away can I be from the 5G and still get a signal? Mattaniah S. Jahn: They usually reach, rule of thumb about a mile. Unknown Person: A mile, wow. Unknown Person: So there's only gonna be one transmitter on my street? Mattaniah S. Jahn: If you're if you're talking about something else called a small cell deployment, those only reach about 500 ft, but that's a completely different tool. Unknown Person: So, if I do get a signal will that be from this new tower? Mattaniah S. Jahn: So if you get a signal, and you’re on Verizon. You will likely pick it up from this tower. Unknown Person: I won't need it. I won’t need a five hundred feet transmitter. Mattaniah S. Jahn: I don't know what the… Unknown Person: The coverage map that you showed was terrible. It was like a bird’s eye view from that point so far away the street names so I have no idea where my house is in the green and the red, I don’t know, where am I? Mattaniah S. Jahn: I will ask Verizon to provide me, I will see if they can provide a closer view. Unknown Person: **inaudible** Mattaniah S. Jahn: All right. Gentleman in the back with the red hat. Page 1360 of 4908 Page 14 of 19 Man: My name is Bob(?). I actually live directly across the street from the project. I was wondering if there were any recourses because I kind of moved to the area to get away from all that…I have two small children and I’m concerned about cancer rates. And it’s going to be an eyesore. I’d rather move out the area, so…recourse?...just a thought? **inaudible** Mattaniah S. Jahn: So, prior to even going that far to when it goes up, you can participate in the public hearing process. You can speak to the Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners as to why you think the project shouldn’t be approved. Information should be routed through Ms. DeJohn. And you can show up at the hearing. Once it's constructed, I mean, they’re a neighbor of yours. It will be a neighbor of you, assuming it’s approved. Yes? Woman: So I did get extremely excited. I'm not gonna lie because I have the worst service possible. But since it’s 5G and whatnot, I do wanna make sure there's coverage. But I also wanna make sure that for the safety of the population that it is far enough from any household so I am completely for it as long as it's at the distance as the gentleman is saying that it doesn't interfere with radiation activity for the population. Mattaniah S. Jahn: So we can actually, let me ask Bridger, if it would be possible to produce something called a nier report. N-I-E-R - non ionizing electromagnetic radiation. And what nier is is energy that goes through through any open space. For example, we're being baked in nier right now. It's light from the lights. They can map that. It is uncommon to get nier reports, but I will ask them if it would be possible to have one. If I can have one prepared , if you give me your information, I will share. Woman: Yes, it's just important because it is just like the when you're around the electrical, like the FPL, you know, setup, towers, whatever it is. It’s been proven up north people that have been raised in areas like that, the high cancer rate is incredible. So it is concerning but it also is concerning that there is no cell phone service. Um, so if there's an emergency, we can't contact people, especially where I'm at. I'm only on 35th Northeast, so it's kind of like a double edged sword. But it would be great to have it in an area where it doesn't affect the population and still gives us service. Mattaniah S. Jahn: Let me see if I can get a nier report together so that you can see how the signal broadcasts and basically, why it would be safe to be around. I, the best I can do is ask them. This gentleman in the back with the red hat raised his hand first, and I'll go to the gentleman in the front with the blue shirt, and then I'll go to the gentleman with the Marines hat. Man:… **inaudible** property value… Mattaniah S. Jahn: So with the property values the way that the data has shown because we’ve looked into that before is that the value of homes don’t not decrease or increase because the presence of a cell tower. In the panhandle the concern is often reversed, it’s are you going to raise my property taxes because the property values are going to go up. Man: …make it hard to sell **inaudible** eyesore ** as far as, for example I don’t want to live across from a school because of noise and traffic. This might be an eyesore for somebody who’s… **inaudible** Page 1361 of 4908 Page 15 of 19 Mattaniah S. Jahn: Everybody has their own proclivity. You know their own, what they're looking for in a house like, for example, I have a I have an ex whose mother believed in the house should have good feng shui, right? And one of the tenants that you can't see out the back of the house from the front door. So, that eliminates, that eliminates the vast majority of houses in Florida for her as a buyer. She's just not gonna be interested in them or she's gonna, you know, make a decision about that, so everyone has their personal choices about what they want out of their house. But when you look at the information as far as what the houses sell for times a sale, it does not change because of proximity to a tower. Man: But does the…support that…as far as…I know sometimes they can say they’ll buy the whole block…**inaudible** Mattaniah S. Jahn: Unfortunately, I'm afraid I’m not a New York State developer, so. Man: So are you the actual applicant? You’re representing the party of interest? **inaudible** Mattaniah S. Jahn: So I represent the applicant, so Bridger Tower Corporation Man: Is the applicant? Mattaniah S. Jahn: They are the applicant. And when you look at cell tower projects, these are these are pieces of infrastructure. They aren't the types of projects that buy up entire blocks no matter who is the company doing it. Sir, you had a question. Man: Um, why haven't you located the cell tower on this huge parcel of land that…the city? Mattaniah S. Jahn: So let's go back to the maps. Man: … Mattaniah S. Jahn: This is the map that shows the surrounding towers, right? And you can see actually a dirt area to the Northwest and that’s roughly the fairgrounds and … and the short answer is physics, the signal won’t reach that far. Let’s go to the next screen. As you can see, for example, with the Forth Island Tower, the tower that’s to the West, it only reaches so far. And if you were to go over a bit more, it wouldn’t be able to reach over into the area they are trying to serve. No w that’s from a coverage standpoint. The other side that doesn’t show up on maps is capacity. So this tower that is proposed meant to soak up traffic off the Everglades Boulevard and Oil Well corridors, the area around that area. Woman: … Mattaniah S. Jahn: There is a whole bunch of traffic as you go back towards Immokalee Road. Um, And if you put the tower over there, it's gonna soak up that traffic and not have resources for your traffic. And I would imagine that in the future, you will see another tower over there long term to pick up that traffic. Again. I can't map capacity that shows up as a bar charts. So, not as interesting to look at. Man: … Mattaniah S. Jahn: You will be after this lady, sir. Page 1362 of 4908 Page 16 of 19 Man: My perspective is that we need … you can’t make cell calls. There’s now emergency service quality. Wifi calling is the sh*ts, pardon my French. So to me, it’s a go. You go to El Salvador, Central America, they’ve got better cell coverage than we do here in the states. My vote is we go ahead and put it in. *inaudible* enough of my comments. Mattaniah S. Jahn: Okay…and are you… Unknown Man: …move here that we live in the Estates. You’re not supposed to have multi-family and you’re supposed to be able to live your life out here in a rural environment. We’re changing the whole aesthetics of our area. I keep going to county meetings and I keep espousing we want to keep that rural concept of the Estates. It’s gone. Okay and anybody who thinks that that tower’s not going to happen. Think again because my mother lives right next to the tower you just did on … and everyone in the neighborhood rejected it and they did it anyway. Unknown Person: You're absolutely right. Unknown Man: And why in the world would you want to put one when nobody wants it? Other than the person who’s going to get some kind of pittance of a… … Unknown Person: … that actually is in the middle of a big hole that no certain… Unknown Man: Then go over to DeSoto where… Mattaniah S. Jahn: Okay, coming back answer… Unknown Person: Housing development planned there. Unknown Man: So they live there now? We do. Mattaniah S. Jahn: To answer your questions. Unknown Person: …from Oil Well all the way down to the boulevard, it's gonna be housing. Unknown Man: And we all understand that a lot of people to make that decision once it's built. We’ve already bought homes here. We are making decisions for where we presently live. Not where we want to move to, but where we presently live. Those issues are not just property builders, it's our health. I have a spouse that has high energy sensitivity. She woke up the other day, just off of the power lines. Now you're going into intensify that with a tower. Mattaniah S. Jahn: Like I was saying earlier, I'm going to answer his question and then I'll come to you, but like I said, I will ask Brider Tower Corporation to see if they can have a nier report put together and, um Unknown Man: One other thing, this line of site. I have a bad problem. I'm very astute, but radio waves – intense and that there is no reason that that tower over Randall Road and Immokalee, could not get this tower. That’s line of site. There’s nothing here. You wouldn’t have any of us complaining about it. Keep it out of our backyards and this problem goes away. Page 1363 of 4908 Page 17 of 19 Mattaniah S. Jahn: I respect that’s your opinion, but based on the RF modeling that Verizon does, they can't serve from here. That's likely going to be it’s own tower even if you you could get the signal that far the traffic will be soaking up. Yes? Jessica Figuera: So, um, I'm glad and I hope that they do give that out, that information. As for the eye sore as you were all discussing on Green Boulevard. Oh, sorry. My name is Jessica Figuera. I'm sorry. I know this is a pain. Um, off of Green Boulevard and Tellier, there is a tower there. I believe the cell tower and it looks like a Christmas tree. So they made it look like a pine tree, so there is no eyesore, and that's really in the middle of the hood. So I don't see why they couldn’t do that for us, and then it wouldn't be an eyesore. Unknown Man: Like that.*inaudible* Jessica Figuera: No. Mattaniah S. Jahn: I was involved in that site, and that one's a 150. I will ask Bridger if it's possible to change it to be a monopine. Unknown Man: That would be awesome! I’m in favor of the pine tree. Jessica Figuera That makes everybody happy! That way it’s not an eyesore, it looks like a pine tree, and everybody’s happy. So it shouldn't be that expensive for Verizon. Mattaniah S. Jahn: I will ask them, they'll go back to Verizon. That’s a conversation that they have to dig further into. So, Um… Jessica Figuera: If they did it for the hood, they can do it for us. *laughter* I’m just stating a fact. Mattaniah S. Jahn: I’ll relay that as well. All right, the gentleman in the red jacket. David Pfaff: Your name sir? Shane Wise: I'm also a real estate agent. Two things I’ll address, the first one would be not only am I real estate, I'm also a cancer patient. Um, it is extremely important to consider people like me, this gentleman’s spouse, and anyone else that might not be in these chairs tonight. Their health and well being. Uh, you're talking and you're hearing the voice of someone has cancer. It’s extremely important to just keep someone like me in your thoughts when you guys build something like this because there is a distance where it can be done. Where we can still have cell phone service so we can communicate effectively amongst each other, whether it's casually or an emergency situation without killing me in 12 weeks. Mattaniah S. Jahn: Let me see about getting the nier report over to you. Shane Wise: Thank you. For the real estate side of it. I've been in several different markets with several different towers. The good news is it hasn't affected anyone's property value. From a standpoint of personal opinion, some people love them because they have great cell phone service, and some people will not live anywhere near them because they don't like the electromagnetic waves. It really does, I've been in real estate for 12 years, 13 years this year. I've served over 500 Page 1364 of 4908 Page 18 of 19 families. Um, it really does boil down to the opinion of the person who either likes or dislikes the tower, but I’ve never seen in affect the … *inaudible* Just to give you some assurance. Unknown Man: Actually, I don’t need some assurance, my mother just tried to sell it. Three people came and looked at it. Saw the new cell tower they just built and turned around and walked. Shane Wise: Because they don’t like it. Jessica Figuera: Electromagnetic. Unknown Man: They don’t want to live next to the cell tower. We just eliminated that 100% of people that came and looked at her house just said no. Shane Wise: I do agree because I've had clients who have said that they won't live anywhere near one. And these are… Jessica Figuera: I’m one of them. I don’t want to live near one because of radiation. Shane Wise: Multi-million dollar clients who won’t buy near one. But it's it's not. It's not everyone, though. Unknown Man: *inaudible* Shane Wise: You're absolutely right. Uh, but just for some of on my own personal experience, having served so many families, some of them say that they don't mind at all because they enjoy the service and all the internet capacity that they get from it, and it doesn't bother them and others won’t live anywhere near them. So I, I agree, but I also want to provide a little bit of reassurance for anyone who is concerned about the actual value of the home itself versus the people that are coming to see it. So thank you for allowing me to share my personal knowledge with you and to make sure that you as an attorney, understand the risk that these towers can create for someone like me. Mattaniah S. Jahn: Yes, sir. Thank you for sharing. Do I have any other questions from anyone else? Well, if that's everything, Uh, let's go back to my contact information, so that way it's available to everyone, so that way they can get a hold of me or Ms. DeJohn. Sir, you stepped out of the room when I asked if anyone had any questions. Laura DeJohn: Can you please state out loud if there were any zoom participants? David Pfaff: There are no zoom participants on this zoom tonight. Unknown Man: What is the timeline? Mattaniah S. Jahn: Assuming that there were no changes in designs or continuances, you’d be looking at this going to hearing maybe in April for it’s first hearing and then maybe May for it’s second hearing. Ms. DeJohn just said May & June more likely. Obviously I was having a fever dream thinking how fast I could get through the process. But after that then it has to go through something called Site Development Plan Review and that’s for technical compliance to make sure the project comforms with County standards for things like the driveway, the landscaping, make sure that the project complies with any commitments I make during the zoning review process. Page 1365 of 4908 Page 19 of 19 Like if the design were to be able to change to the monopine. And then it finally goes to Building Permit Review where it’s reviewed to make sure it complies with Florida Building Code. Site Development Plan process in it’s day, my experience in Collier County, takes 6-8 months best case. I have projects that have been in Site Development Plan for a year easy. Then the Building Permit process takes about 4-6 weeks easy. Unknown Man: You brought up a great point. The Building Department issued them. Is this on wetlands? Because that floods all the time. Mattaniah S. Jahn: No, it’s not on wetlands. Unknown Man: It’s not considered wetlands at all? It does not hold water? Mattaniah S. Jahn: It's not consider wetlands. So, um, they still have to comply with state law for stormwater runoff and also county code which goes beyond that. And that usually means that not only are they designed to hold water, um to take in, hold and percolate water through the gravel that's in the equipment compound, so that way it doesn't run off. But they usually often have a dry swale in the landscape buffer. I've been seeing a lot of that again that way, it doesn't send water off the property. Collier County is very stringent. It goes over the state standards and is more strict than most counties. Jessica Figuera: The monopine will also blend in with the landscaping being rural. It goes perfect. Unknown Man: I would love to see that. Jessica Figuera: Because I don't even know why they made a monopine here because it's in the middle of the city. But over there it actually will blend in with the actual landscape. Unknown Man: Collier County should…disguised…they’re so ugly… *inaudible* Mattaniah S. Jahn: Well, unless there's any other questions, and of course you have my contact information if you come up with any other questions afterwards. I will not keep you from the rest of your evening. Thank you, everyone. We started this NIM at 6pm and are adjourning at 7:04 P.M. Time ended – 7:04 P.M. Page 1366 of 4908 Date: February 8, 2024 Site Name/ Case Number: Bridger FL 5283 COMMUNITY lVIEETING SIGN-IN SHEET Name Address Email Address 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. Page 1367 of 4908 Date: February 8, 2024 Site Name/ Case Number: Bridger FL 5283 COMMUNITY MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET Name Address Email Address 8.5/4{)J'!L W / '5g;';> 6 97 ;,:>-A {/-tie_ /UE, /(JCIP/45 Siovte,<'.'.;,..,�'.'.:_;;_� 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17.Page 1368 of 4908 Bridger Tower Palmetto Ridge II Project Parcel ID: 40171120109 Page 1369 of 4908 Reasons a new tower is needed: Coverage: Existing holes in the area need to be filled Capacity: Just like roads, towers have a limited amount of capacity before they can’t handle any more “traffic” When a tower reaches capacity, it can’t receive new calls Page 1370 of 4908 Considerations when placing a tower: Neighboring towers Too Close, and the new tower will interfere with the next tower over Too Far away, and there will be a hole in coverage + it won’t offload traffic Neighboring Properties Collier County’s code requires separations from residential and other properties (2.5 x tower height) Height dictated by need –shorter = insufficient coverage/offload Located near the traffic source Towers must be near the cellular users to serve them Not like old AM/FM radio stations… far side of the county Page 1371 of 4908 Page 1372 of 4908 Page 1373 of 4908 Page 1374 of 4908 What’s proposed? 184’ Lattice Style Tower (Lattice) Lattice = 1 support structure, no ironworks or guy wires Antennas mounted on upper side of Tower Bridger is requesting a reduction of the 2.5 times tower height separation requirement to the North, South & East The Lattice meets or exceeds all other required standards of the Collier County’s Code The Lattice will provide 100% tower height distance to the West This Lattice will be completely dark at night This Lattice will be designed to hold antennas for up to 4 carriers Verizon will be the first carrier The remaining 3 will be made available for colocation Page 1375 of 4908 Why are we Building a Tower Here? Page 1376 of 4908 Explanation of Wireless Data Growth Page 1377 of 4908 Site Plan Location & Facility Layout Page 1378 of 4908 Page 1379 of 4908 Z-3 Page 1380 of 4908 Z5 Page 1381 of 4908 Z6 Page 1382 of 4908 Page 1383 of 4908 Photo Simulations Page 1384 of 4908 Page 1385 of 4908 Page 1386 of 4908 Page 1387 of 4908 Page 1388 of 4908 Page 1389 of 4908 Page 1390 of 4908 Page 1391 of 4908 Page 1392 of 4908 Page 1393 of 4908 Verizon Wireless Coverage Maps Page 1394 of 4908 Page 1395 of 4908 Page 1396 of 4908 Page 1397 of 4908 What’s the Process? Bridger Tower has filed for Conditional Use & Variance Permit applications with Collier County County Staff is reviewing the applications for compliance with the City Code Mailed Public notice & Newspaper Ad has been sent out for the community meeting today Collier County Planning & Zoning will be holding a hearing on this application in the near future Another notice will be sent out Page 1398 of 4908 Contact Information: Collier County Growth Management Staff: Laura DeJohn P: 239.252.5587 E: laura.dejohn@colliercountyfl.gov Applicant: Mattaniah S. Jahn P: 727.773.2221 E: mjahn@thelawmpowered.com Page 1399 of 4908 Thank You For Your Time Page 1400 of 4908 Page 1401 of 4908 Page 1402 of 4908 Page 1403 of 4908 Radio Emission Safety Page 1404 of 4908 Page 1405 of 4908 Safety E911 •Verizon Wireless has battery backup at a majority of its facilities. This is a critical element to keeping a site operating during a natural disaster or other emergency. •76% of 911 calls originate from a cell phone (National Highway Traffic Administration, February, 2016) •240 million 911 calls are made annually from wireless phones. (Answers, March 2015) •It is common that emergency services can have a 3:1 usages of wireless devices. They can utilize phones (as they are more reliable than some radio services), aircards for their incar computers, and feeds to cameras in snow plows. •Verizon Wireless is the primary communication source for numerous federal, state, and local emergency service organizations. It is critical that these groups have the coverage and capacity in their wireless networks to meet their E911 and other needs. Page 1406 of 4908 RF Safety FCC: http://www.fcc.gov/encyclopedia/faqs-wireless-phones#safe http://www.fcc.gov/guides/wireless-devices-and-health-concerns FDA:http://www.fda.gov/Radiation-EmittingProducts/RadiationEmitting ProductsandProcedures/HomeBusiness andEntertainment/CellPhones/ucm116335.htm World Health Organization:http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/ fs193/en/ The National Cancer Institute:http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/causes- prevention/risk-factors/radiation/cell-phones-fact-sheet Page 1407 of 4908 Page 1408 of 4908 Page 1409 of 4908 Page 1 of 1 January 20, 2024 Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) for: Variance # PL20220006738 and Conditional Use # PL20220003008 MCDERMOTT, CAROLYN O 1 VINTON DR PENACOOK NH 03303 Dear Property Owner: Please be advised that a formal application has been submitted to Collier County seeking approval of a Conditional Use and Variance for property located at 3147 31st Avenue NE, also described as: The northeast corner of Everglades Blvd. N. and 31st Avenue NE., Parcel # 40171120002. The petitioner is asking the County to approve this application to allow development of a 180’ Tall Self Support Telecommunication Tower on the described property. In compliance with the Land Development Code requirements, a Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held to provide you an opportunity to become fully aware of our development intentions and to give you an opportunity to influence the form of development. The Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held on February 8th, 2024, at 6:00 p.m. at Big Corkscrew Island Community Center, 810 39th Ave. NE, Naples, FL 34120. At this meeting the petitioner will make every effort to illustrate how the property will be developed and to answer any questions. Should you have questions prior to the meeting, please contact me at 727.773.2221. Sincerely, Mattaniah S. Jahn, Esq. MSJ/cjlb Page 1410 of 4908 Page 1411 of 4908 NAME1 NAME 2 NAME 3 NAME 4 NAME 5 CITY STATE COUNTRY ZIP MCDERMOTT, CAROLYN O 1 VINTON DR PENACOOK NH UNITED STATES 03303 COLLIER CNTY 3335 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34112 COLLIER SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT 14700 IMMOKALEE RD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34112 PULIDO, SARA 8252 NW 6TH TERRACE #246 MIAMI FL UNITED STATES 33126 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34112 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34112 ROCHASSE, ROSELORE 12355 COLLIER BLVD #D NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34116 AUST, WILLIAM CAROL J GIORGI 5863 PRIVATE RD PO BOX 242 LAHASKA PA UNITED STATES 18931 BERRY, CHRISTOPHER W KONRD M BERRY 4327 SW 125TH LN 4327 MIRAMAR FL UNITED STATES 33027 TREMBLAY, SERGE 4 DU BELVEDERE DOMAINE DES HAUTS-BOIS STE JULIE QC CANADA J3E 3M 5 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34112 CASASIERRA REALTY LLC 5800 PINE TREE RD PARKLAND FL UNITED STATES 33067 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34112 MOONEY ET AL, THOMAS JORJA V THOMAS MURCIA CARMEN M HANKINS COLON 308 WILLRICH CIR #E FOREST HILL MD UNITED STATES 21050 COLLIER CNTY 3335 TAMIAMIA TRL E STE 101 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34112 COLLIER CNTY 3335 TAMIAMI TRL E STE 101 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34112 THOMPSON, MARIA V CONSTANTINOS A LEVANOS 23941 ADDISON PLACE CT BONITA SPRINGS FL UNITED STATES 34134 COLLIER CNTY 3335 TAMIAMI TRAIL E STE 101 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34112 ALVAREZ, ANDY VANESSA DIAZ 3245 39TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 PHAN, NAM V 45 HARTFORD AVE DRACUT MA UNITED STATES 01826 HC & SONS LLC 25211 PINSON DR BONITA SPRINGS FL UNITED STATES 34135 K&M RIVENBURG REV TRUST 3199 39TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 PRUITT, TANKER D & LUCY 2995 39TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 IGNATENKO, MIGUEL D 2975 39TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MONTOYA, RICARDO ANTONIO MONTOYA GAMBOA 2965 39TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 HITE, TRAVIS JULIANA GARCIA 2935 39TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 VILLAFRANCA, ARNALDO BARBARA VILLAFRANCA 6930 SW 178TH AVE SOUTHWEST RANCHE FL UNITED STATES 33331 PEZZINO, RICHARD ANTHONY 2875 39TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ROMULUS, ROBERSON JUNIOR 2865 39TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ZAMORA, YAIMA 2857 39TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 GUILLAUME, WILFRIDO BRENDA MAHLALELA 2845 39TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 LYNCH, TIMOTHY R & DIANE S 2795 39TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MORA, ARTURO MORALES LETICIA SANCHEZ 3964 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 BARBA, YOEL ZEQUEIRA 3965 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ROJAS, JUDITH MICHEL HERRERA-MACIAS 3920 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 PEREZ, JOSE LUIS NENYS TORO 3945 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 BARROSO, BARBARO G ANA MARIA LIRIANO 3935 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 PEREZ, PEDRO DENISSE CALDERON OTAMENDY 6365 COLLINS AVENUE UNIT 3406 MIAMI BEACH FL UNITED STATES 33141 SAN RAFAEL LLC 3020 S W 30TH AVE PEMBROKRE PPINE FL UNITED STATES 33009 BRANGUS CATTLE LLC 1998 NW 18TH AVE PEMBROOKE PINES FL UNITED STATES 33028 DEL ASSET HOLDING LLC 6722 NW 108TH AVE PARKLAND FL UNITED STATES 33076 PORCO, TROY & CHRISTINE 2705 BROOKMERE RD CHARLOTTESVILLE VA UNITED STATES 22901 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34112 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34112 COLLIER COUNTY 3335 TAMIAMI TRAIL E STE 102 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34112 COLLIER CNTY 3335 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34112 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34112 KRAMER, ELWANDA H 93 KUNZE DR SAINT CHARLES MO UNITED STATES 63303 TALAVERA, JOSE L RAMIRO DIAZ 2707 NW 7TH TER CAPE CORAL FL UNITED STATES 33993 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34112 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34112 ZENAIDA GATTAMOTA REV TRUST 2295 SW 133RD CT MIAMI FL UNITED STATES 33175 COLLIER COUNTY 3335 TAMIAMI TRAIL E STE 101 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34112 Page 1412 of 4908 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34112 KRINCE LIVING TRUST LINDA M KRINCE TR 7137 ERIE DR MENTOR OH UNITED STATES 44060 CUMANA, DANIEL & MARTA 9079 NW 121ST ST HIALEAH GARDENS FL UNITED STATES 33018 COLLIER COUNTY 3335 TAMIAMI TR E STE #102 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34112 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34112 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34112 COLLIER CNTY 3335 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34112 CLERMONT, JAMES STEPHANIE DUMEL 5350 TRAMMEL ST NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34113 SILVA JR, RICHARD 1141 SW 44TH TERRACE CAPE CORAL FL UNITED STATES 33914 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34112 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34112 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34112 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34112 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34112 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34112 THOMPSON, MARIA V CONSTANTINOS A LEVANOS 23941 ADDISON PLACE CT BONITA SPRINGS FL UNITED STATES 34134 ROJAS, RAUL A & ELVIA 1687 SW 136TH PL MIAMI FL UNITED STATES 33175 MOW INVESTMENTS LLC 311 8TH ST NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 RICARDO, RACQUEL ANN 3200 39TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 DOUROUNTOUDAKIS, NICK 1515 146TH PL WHITESTONE NY UNITED STATES 11357 MASSEY, CAROL 2322 WOODBRIDGE AVE EDISON NJ UNITED STATES 08817 LINDLEY II, STUART DEAN 2990 39TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 DORTA JR, RAMON & OLGA LIDIA 2970 39TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MORENO, LEOSVEL MONTANO 2940 39TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 FERNANDEZ JR, FRANCISCO R YANELY FERNANDEZ 2930 39TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 JOSEPH, HERCULE CELANNE DORISCAR JOSEPH 2920 39TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 WIELAND, MONA 187 MOUNTAIN AVE N CALDWELL NJ UNITED STATES 07006 DIEPPA, REINALDO & CARIDAD 640 E 10TH AVE HIALEAH FL UNITED STATES 33010 SANCHEZ, DAHILL DAVID REYES 2880 39TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 AGUIRRE, JESUS 706 PINE CREST LN NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34104 LEON, ADIENE FACENDA 2854 39TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 RE PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC 1885 GRIFFIN RD #B428 DANIA BEACH FL UNITED STATES 33004 BLUME, STEPHEN L 2820 39TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 LUSK III, HAL H & CRYSTAL G 2810 39TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 GG 64 LLC 7154 LAUREL LN MIAMI LAKES FL UNITED STATES 33014 GONZALEZ, RAFAEL 2760 39TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 SURANYI, FERENC 2744 39TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 SILVERIO, ALEXEY GARCIA ELAINE A MARTINEZ RODRIGUEZ 2730 39TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 RANKIN, YALLEN AGUILA 2720 39TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 BARRERA, LAURA SAYONARA GUSTAVO HUMBERTO PERILLA 2696 39TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 SCHWAB, CHARLES M & DOROTHY M 12859 AXLINE RD LOVETTSVILLE DC UNITED STATES 20180 CAMARGO, IDANIA CABRERA ISRAEL RODRIGUEZ DELGADO 2646 39TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 CHERUBIN, BEAUCHAMP ALTAGRACE CHERUBIN 3875 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 DELGADO, ILEANA D 3865 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 SHAVER, JEREMY SCOTT JULIA LEE SHAVER 3840 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 PALACIOS, MILSA S JUAN M PALACIOS 3843 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 TEJADA, PAOLA ANDREA 3840 EVER GLADES BLVD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 PADRON, ARMANDO E & PAULA O 12851 NW 2ND ST MIAMI FL UNITED STATES 33182 WYNESS, ROBERT J & PEGGY A 3825 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ZEPPA INGINO, JOAN ERNEST T INGINO 3785 37TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 GONZALEZ, GRETTEL OSCAR GARCIA 3765 37TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 THOMAS E & CYNTHIA A BAKER DECLARATION OF TRUST 853 LAMBTON CIR W LANCASTER OH UNITED STATES 43130 URBINA, ADALID 3735 37TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 AYALA, GUADALUPE JUAN LEON AYALA 3725 37TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MEDINA, FREDY A & MARLEN R 3711 37TH AVE N E NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 Page 1413 of 4908 GONZALEZ, ROBERTO MEDINILLA 3685 37TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MURPHY, MARK GEOFFREY DEBRA LYNN MURPHY 3677 37TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 JOYCE A CULVER REVOCABLE TRUST 2837 LAKE BALDWIN LN #A402 ORLANDO FL UNITED STATES 32814 JEANNOT, WALNA 3707 JUSTICE CIR IMMOKALEE FL UNITED STATES 34142 COLLIER CNTY 3335 TAMIAMI TRL E NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34112 COLLIER COUNTY 3335 TAMIAMI TR E STE #102 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34112 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34112 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34112 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34112 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34112 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34112 WILSON, REBECCA A 1711 W NELSON ST CHICAGO IL UNITED STATES 60657 J & D INVEST LLC 3840 28TH AVE SE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34117 COLLIER SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT 14700 IMMOKALEE RD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34112 GARCIA, ROGERIO J 1701 SW DESERT AVE PORT SAINT LUCIE FL UNITED STATES 34953 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34112 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34112 PETITFORT, DONNA 2727 46TH ST SW NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34116 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34112 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34112 HIGDON TR, GAREY D TR DTD 8-5-88 PO BOX 221769 LOUISVILLE KY UNITED STATES 40252 FERNANDEZ, ERIK C TERRATRUST LLC 13721 SW 13TH ST MIAMI FL UNITED STATES 33928 COLLIER CNTY 3335 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34112 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34112 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34112 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34112 CALVO, JORGE A JEANNETTE CALVO 4703 S LISBON CT AURORA CO UNITED STATES 80015 COLLIER COUNTY 3335 TAMIAMI TR E STE #102 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34112 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34112 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34112 COLLIER COUNTY 3335 TAMIAMI TRAIL E NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34112 BRUNA, JUAN M & BLANCA JUAN C BRUNA ANGELA M BRUNA 860 E 38TH ST HIALEAH FL UNITED STATES 33013 COLLIER CNTY 3335 TAMIAMI TRL E STE 101 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34112 GAMEZ, FELIPE MARIA ANGEL SERRANO HERNANDEZ 3235 37TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 RUIZ, ERIC A CAMPOS 3225 37TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 RAMIREZ, AIDA MARIA MENDOZA 5882 W 2ND CT HIALEAH FL UNITED STATES 33012 PALACIO, JUANITA M JOAQUIN C PALACIO JUANA PALACIO 622 E RIDGE VILLAGE DR CUTLER BAY FL UNITED STATES 33157 VASQUEZ, DIEGO JOSELIN MELENDEZ VASQUEZ 3787 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 SUNSHINE FL DEVELOPMENT INC 158 7TH ST NW NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 TEREKHOV, SERGEY 3580 2ND AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34117 VIERA, LUIS ALBERTO 142 SANTA CLARA DR #1 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34104 CHERNIAVSKI, ELENA 6052 NICHOLAS DR WEST BLOOMFIELD MI UNITED STATES 48322 ARREGUIN, ANTONIO 2925 37TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 STECKMAN, NICKOLAS ERIC ERICA BACHER STECKMAN 2925 37TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MARIN, PABLO DARIO GLORIA ELENA MARIN 8204 N W 105 AVE TAMARAC FL UNITED STATES 33321 LEAL, JUSTIN JAVIER CHELSEA BEASLEY 2885 37TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 BARTON, D R PO BOX 105 EVERGLADES CITY FL UNITED STATES 34139 BAUTISTA, VERONICA RAMIREZ 2865 37TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 CEPEDA, ALI R VALBUENA DANYELA C SILVA 2841 37TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 CONTRERAS, SERGIO JEANETTA G CONTRERAS 2833 37TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ALVAREZ, JOSE PEREZ ISABEL HERNANDEZ 2821 37TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MIRAVISTA DEV CORP 4099 TAMIAMI TRAIL N #403 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34103 CARVAJAL JR, JORGE A LOURDES CARVAJAL 2765 37TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 PIERRETTE, MAX LUDERNE SAINT PREUX PIERETTE 2735 37TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 Page 1414 of 4908 BEVARS, JANICE R GARY ATKINSON 2725 37TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MARIN, PABLO DARIO GLORIA ELENA MARIN 8204 N 2 105 AVE TAMARAC FL UNITED STATES 33321 WOODSIDE, WILLIAM P & AMANDA J 2703 37TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MONTOYA, PEDRO & ZENAIDA PO BOX 163321 MIAMI FL UNITED STATES 33116 FERNANDEZ, DOMINGO DANIA PERAZA 2681 37TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 REYES, MARTHA ROCHE ELPIDIO NARANJO 2675 37TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ALONSO, JOSEPH & MICHELLE 2645 37TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 RODRIGUEZ, EMIL LADY JOHANA RODRIGUEZ 2627 37TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 TORRES, FRANCISCO LIDIA ESCOBAR 2605 37TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 BERMAN, MATTHEW D & CARRIE L 5355 CORAL WOOD DR NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34119 S S RAKEL FITZGERALD TRUST 131 HAWKS RIDGE CIR LOVELAND OH UNITED STATES 45140 ACOSTA,CARLOS J JAZMIN MOLINA-ACOSTA 2565 37TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 PALICIER, ILODY GUERLINE J PALICIER KENSON PALISSIER 2545 37TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 LARA, ARMANDO J CASTILLO SILVIA LARA GALVAN 2535 37TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 PELIER, EUDY DURAN ANAVEL ESTEVEZ TIRADO 2525 37TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 HERNANDEZ, LAZARO BELKIS RIVES 3780 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 RODRIGUEZ, FERDINAND VIRGINIA RODRIGUEZ 7426 SURREY WOOD LN APOLLO BEACH FL UNITED STATES 33572 SCHWALM, MARION K & JEFFREY 3775 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 DIRIENZO, LEONARDO & MICHELLE 1949 ANDERSON LN NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 HUTSON, AUSTIN R 2481 SOUTH URBANA LISBON RD SOUTH CHARLESTON OH UNITED STATES 45368 LAPORTE, SARA EMILY & KEVIN J 3165 37TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 POGAN, WILLIAM C TEAGAN J DOYLE 3735 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 RODRIGUEZ, JAVIER & ANA 2931 52ND AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 RAUDNER, HANNES M ANGEL MARIA RAUDNER 3850 37TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 BLANCO, JORGE ALBERTO SICILIA YULIET PEREZ PEREZ 3842 37TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 CAPOTE, GUILLERMINA & KARIM 3830 37TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 JEREMIE, JEAN PATRICK JESULA LINDOR 3820 37TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 O'BRIEN, CHARLES F 3814 37TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ACOSTA, JEISY MALIA FERNANDEZ VILLALON 3802 37TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MONROIG, LETICIA 3780 37TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 CASTELLANOS, FABIO A CINDY J CAST 3770 37TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 PIRGU, ARMAND & RIANNE 3760 37TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ULLOA, YADIEL GOMEZ 3730 37TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ULLOA, YADIEL GOMEZ 3730 37TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 GUTIERREZ, ELIZABETH & CARLOS 3720 37TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ESCOBAR-BARRIENTOS, LUIS F PIEDAD DEL CARMEN MARULANDA 3690 37TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 SAINTHEARD, SMITH ISADORA DEJERVIL 3680 37TH AVENUE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 LYNCH, ANDRE 3210 14TH AVE SE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34117 LYNCH, ANDRE 3210 14TH AVE SE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34117 OFARRIL, MARIBEL IN DER GANDSTRASSE 12 ZUMIKON 8126 SWITZERLAND SAA, MARITZA LUIS J MALATESTA 80-45 KEW GARDEN RD #404 KEW GARDEN NY UNITED STATES 11415 MUNOZ, RAFAEL 4102 TRENTON AVE HOLLYWOOD FL UNITED STATES 33026 BAILEY, SCOTT KENT CHRISTOPHER ROGER BAILEY 371 CROSSROADS CHURCH RD ROCKMART GA UNITED STATES 30153 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34112 COLLIER CNTY 3335 TAMIAMI TRAIL E STE 101 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34112 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34112 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34112 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34112 FARINAS, VICTOR 9795 SW 114 ST MIAMI FL UNITED STATES 33176 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34112 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34112 COLLIER COUNTY 3335 TAMIAMI TR E NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34112 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34112 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34112 PIIRAK, AILEEN K ENE PIIRAK 132 MAYWOOD DR SYRACUSE NY UNITED STATES 13205 Page 1415 of 4908 VICTOR, NADIA JEAN BAZELAIS JEAN 4091 20TH PLACE S W NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34116 FELIX SR, GERALD D MARIE THERESE LOUIS GERALD GERALD D FELIX JR SEAN FELIX 21464 WHITEHALL TER QUEENS VILLAGE NY UNITED STATES 11427 FELIX SR, GERALD D MARIE THERESE LOUIS GERALD D FELIX JR SEAN FELIX 21464 WHITEHALL TER QUEENS VILLAGE NY UNITED STATES 11427 COLLIER CNTY 3335 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34112 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34112 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34112 JARVIS, ROBERT C JENNIFER J URNESS 9351 SUMMER PL NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34109 FOULDS JR EST, JOHN L 1963 ART SCHOOL RD CHESTER SPRINGS PA UNITED STATES 19425 SINCIC, STEVEN J & DENISE L 4465 RANCH RD WILLIAMSBURG MI UNITED STATES 49690 DENNIS J SHANKS REV TRUST MARY JO SHANKS REV TRUST 42W030 HUGHES RD ELBURN IL UNITED STATES 60119 WOOLFORK, RONNIE 3286 37TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 NAFEH, ZAMIRA IAN MICHAEL BOWLES 3280 37TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 DESIR, MARIE 3260 37TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 GUZMAN, IRMA 3240 37TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 RAUTIO, SANDRA JEAN AMY JEAN RABER 3230 37TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 HAUVER EST, THOMAS C/O ESTHER SW HAUVER FENG 917 N SPOEDE RD SAINT LOUIS MO UNITED STATES 63146 GOLDEN GATE OF NAPLES INC 1687 EVERGLADES BLVD S NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34117 PARMAR, KIRPAL S SARBJEET K PARMAR 3660 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 SHEIKH, MAHAMMED S SHAMIM SHEIKH 205 NW 128 AVE MIAMI FL UNITED STATES 33182 PARMENTER, JOSHUA M 2992 37TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 DIAZ, ALEXANDER GOYES DEISY RODRIGUEZ 2972 37TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 FAZIO, WENDY A 2940 37TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 DEVISSE, VIRGINIA 10701 GULF SHORE DR #201 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34108 RODRIGUEZ, MARTHA FABIAN FLORES ZAMARRIPA 2920 37TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 HOLMACHEA, YANET CABRERA 2910 37TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 BARACK, GEORGE J JANICE NIXON KAREN M LAPOINT 4515 BRUENING DR PARMA OH UNITED STATES 44134 ALSLIMAN, MOHAMMAD 860 RABBIT RD SANIBEL FL UNITED STATES 33957 SYNERGY INVEST LLC 5934 PREMIER WAY #2162 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34109 RODRIGUEZ, CARLINA E IRIBARREN ESTEBAN DEJESUS SARABIA 2832 37TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 LUTHER, GEORGE E & SUSAN JOY 2820 37TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 PEREZ, LISSETTE 2788 37TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 GURREA, STEVEN MICHAEL THUSSANNEE LAPSOPA 2770 37TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 LEE, GARY W 20082 US HIGHWAY 81 ARLINGTON SD UNITED STATES 57212 WALTERS, RICHARD & SHELLY 2740 37TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 POOLE ZACHARY T & MELISSA D 2710 37TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 EVOLUTION ELEVEN INVSTMNTS LLC 1222 SE 47TH ST #202 CAPE CORAL FL UNITED STATES 33904 CORREA, YENNY V MIGUEL MONTES DELGADO 2680 37TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 COLLINS, HOMER M % DAVE COLLINS 12749 S HAGAN CT OLATHE KS UNITED STATES 66062 ALONSO, RODNEY JUANA RAQUEL GUTIERREZ BARRERA 2644 37TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 GILL, INDERBIR & NAVNEET KAUR 1126 HILLCREST AVE PASADENA CA UNITED STATES 91106 WATSON, DAVID WADE & JOYCE A 816 FOSTER RD GUTHRIE OK UNITED STATES 73044 MARTINEZ, ELIGIO & YULIET 2580 37TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MCKENZIE, HECTOR MARCIA HANIFORD MCKENZIE 4367 WICKHAM AVE BRONX NY UNITED STATES 10466 ELLIOTT, PRESTON ANN-MARIE CRUICKSHANK 46 CARSTAIRS RD VALLEY STREAM NY UNITED STATES 11581 MV MULTISERVICE INC 6823 LOCHNESS DRIVE MIAMI LAKES FL UNITED STATES 33014 CRUZ, LUIS J MARIA PEREIRA JUNNIO FREIXA 6090 W 15TH CT HIALEAH FL UNITED STATES 33012 ALVAREZ, MARIA G MORENO JAIME LOPEZ LEON 2488 37TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 HOLMER IV, GEORGE E & CASSIE A 2470 37TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MIRANDA, CHARLES 2460 37TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 GOMEZ FAMILY TRUST % FANNY GOMEZ 7950 NW 13TH ST PEMBROKE PINES FL UNITED STATES 33024 CASTRO REVOCABLE TRUST 5861 WAXMYRTLE WAY NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34109 ROSS, MARK L & GRETCHEN J 3636 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 LA ESPERIA DAVEY LLC 4991 BONITA BAY BLVD #1401 BONITA SPRINGS FL UNITED STATES 34134 LUGONES, OILDA M 2146 DESOTO BLVD S NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34117 BARBARA J KLINK REV TRUST 3845 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 Page 1416 of 4908 PROPER MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC 6188 MIRAMAR PKWY MIRAMAR FL UNITED STATES 33023 JACQUES, JUAN F 3821 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 COLLINS, DANIELLE MARIE 3811 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 GARCIA, DEYMI 3789 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 CORREIA ET UX, RICHARD W PO BOX 265 ORRS ISLAND ME UNITED STATES 04066 GONZALEZ, JUAN CARLOS SANCHEZ EMILIA VANESSA AGUIRRE 3775 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MARCIA J SMITH LIVING TRUST 3761 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MARTINEZ, WILMER & ELDA 3753 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 FERRELL, DOUGLAS J SHAWNA L FERRELL 735 CORAL DR CAPE CORAL FL UNITED STATES 33904 GAVILANES, LUIS A CAROLINE SOTO 3725 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 BANOS, YORKY LINARES IRAIMY GARCIA BORROTO 3711 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 KEPPLE, JESSICA FIGUEROA 3697 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 TORRES, LUIS E LEANEZ THAMARA T ROMERO LOPEZ 3681 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 PERERA, JULIO SANDRA ANGARITA 3675 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 JOSEPH, PAULEUS & ROSEMANE 3665 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 BORCHERS, JOHN & JACQUELINE 3635 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MATA, JOSE REYES 3060 NW 98TH ST MIAMI FL UNITED STATES 33147 SUNNY HOME SOLUTION LLC TR SUNNY HOME SOLUTION LLC UTD 1/1/04 407 PINEWOOD DR OLDSMAR FL UNITED STATES 34677 ZULUAGA MARTINEZ, SEBASTIAN 28900 VERSOL DR #101 BONITA SPRINGS FL UNITED STATES 34135 BENIMADHO, ARMAND PHARMASING 11221 NW 46TH LN DORAL FL UNITED STATES 33178 R P & M D BELL REV TRUST 58 NORTH COLLIER BLVD #414 MARCO ISLAND FL UNITED STATES 34145 KHAN, KHAIRULLA & FREEZA 6525 UTOPIA PKWY FRESH MEADOWS NY UNITED STATES 11365 BALDWIN, MATTHEW JAMES DIANE CAROL BALDWIN 2892 ARMSTRONG DR LAKE ORION MI UNITED STATES 48360 SCOTT, I W & MARGARET 4401 WATERBURY RD RALEIGH NC UNITED STATES 27604 STROETER, ASHLEY NICOLE CLARK P STROETER 3525 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 AMAYA JR, RAFAEL A 1827 SW 21ST STREET #1 FORT LAUDERDALE FL UNITED STATES 33315 SANTAMARIA, GISELLE DEL CARMEN 12205 180TH AVE CT E BONNEY LAKE WA UNITED STATES 98391 VELASCO, ALBERTO & MARTHA 240 20TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 TOLEDO, VIRVES & JUANA 3395 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MORALES, RONALD A 10101 SANDY HOLLOW LN #107 BONITA SPRINGS FL UNITED STATES 34135 TOLEDO SR, VIRVES & JUANA L 3395 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ALVAREZ, ANDREA DANIEL CERRADA 3385 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 FLORES, MARIA MARCELA 3375 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ESTRADA, FRANCISCO 3355 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 LEBON, FRITZ P 3345 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 JFD NAPLES LLC 11693 BALD EAGLE WAY NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 KERLUS, PRUDISE 3323 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 RODRIGUEZ, JAVIER & ERIKO M 3311 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 PETTES, MARSHAWN D 18234 COYLE ST DETROIT MI UNITED STATES 48235 SARNA, JULIUS G & ADELINE M % G WHITE 3452 MONO DR RIVERSIDE CA UNITED STATES 92506 MARTINEZ, BASILIO R & DIGNORA 3520 E 9TH CT HIALEAH FL UNITED STATES 33013 RAMOS, OLGA 5178 GENOA ST AVE MARIA FL UNITED STATES 34142 3247 35 AVE NE LLC 8805 NW 149 TER MIAMI LAKES FL UNITED STATES 33018 BELL, MITCHELL N 803 E 1ST AVE NEW SMYRNA BEACH FL UNITED STATES 32169 JOHN F LEWIS TRUST 2760 MARSH POINT LN SE SOUTHPORT NC UNITED STATES 28461 LORRAINE V MCKAY REV TRUST GEORGE W MCKAY REV TRUST 1163 FRANK WHITEMAN BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34103 CHARLES, GUERDA C 3210 BERMUDA ISLE CIR #1218 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34109 PICHARDO, JHONY N YOSELYN J NUNEZ 6911 ENIVRON BLVD #1K LAUDERHILL FL UNITED STATES 33319 ARCISZEWSKI, SCOTT 2991 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 RAUBA, CORD 9653 OGDEN CT THORNTON CO UNITED STATES 80029 DAVIS, KENNETH R & JOYLETT Y KENYA Y DAVIS 1160 16TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 BARBOSA, AMELIDA & EDMUNDO 2945 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 COLINDRES, EDGAR AUGUSTO MARIA GRACE LYNCH GARMENDEZ 5721 A CENTER LN #203 FALLS CHURCH VA UNITED STATES 22042 GARCIA, Y EMILIO RODRIGUEZ 2911 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 BARKES, DEBRA A JAMES M CARTER 5690 TAYLOR RD HARTSVILLE IN UNITED STATES 47224 Page 1417 of 4908 VELAZQUEZ DEL TORO, KATIA ROBERTO PEREZ 2885 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 VALLEJO, CARLOS 2875 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 PEREZ, ANTONIO & ERMIZ 2865 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 VIERA, TERESA 6255 REVELRY CT AVE MARIA FL UNITED STATES 34142 BRYANT, BENJAMIN ISAIAH BARINA MARQUET BRYANT 2835 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 GODOY, ALAN CINDY N SANTOS 2540 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 VOGEL NORMAN IRVING LISA RUTH WEGWEISER VOGEL 2807 35TH AVE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 HORSFORD, JACQUELINE L 872 E 59TH ST BROOKLYN NY UNITED STATES 11234 ALENS, SANDRA M 2779 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 DOEHRING, JAMES R & JUDY A 7136 CURTIS DR DARDENNE PRAIRIE MO UNITED STATES 63368 HERNANDEZ, LUCIA C RAMON DIAZ 2765 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34108 AURIA INC 5091 GENOVA ST AVE MARIA FL UNITED STATES 34142 MONTEZ, MIGUEL A & ESMERALDA D 2725 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 DELGADO, TERESA 2685 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 HERRERA, JORGE ENRIQUE ZAMORA 115 MIAMI GARDENS RD WEST PARK FL UNITED STATES 33023 AMAYA, SANTOS V 2665 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 GIBSON, KAMILAH 17420 SW 108 AVE MIAMI FL UNITED STATES 33157 PEREZ, MIRTHA 2625 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 IBALMEA, YOSEM LAUZARDO ZULEYMIS RIESGO CARDOSO 2615 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 THOMPSON, LISA ANN & PAUL W 2595 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 CAMACHO, VICENTE 220 1ST ST NW NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 PEREZ, ESTRELLA YANLHEISER R GONZALEZ 2575 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 CRUZ, HECTOR I & IDALMIS 2565 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 DIAZ, MARCO LOPEZ ALIET GAMEZ DIAZ 2545 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 HERNANDEZ, JOSE SOCCORO 2535 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 DAYTON, LYNN E 2525 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 TSCHUPP, EDWARD W CAROLYN LESLIE PHELPS TSCHUPP 2485 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 RODRIGUEZ TR, JUAN C ZENAIDA M RODRIGUEZ TR 12425 SW 88TH CT MIAMI FL UNITED STATES 33176 DORCELIAN, LOUIS & ANGELENE 2441 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34112 OJEDA, FRANCISCO 2431 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 EMERITA ASSOCIATED USA INC ATTN DANA BEHAR 744 BROAD ST STE 406 NEWARK NJ UNITED STATES 07102 CROWLEY, MICHAEL & DANIELLE 2391 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 JOEL, DAVID & MARISSA 2381 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 HERRERA, JUAN Y 3540 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 BARRON, THOMAS A & ROANNE 285 TADS TRAIL OLDSMAR FL UNITED STATES 34677 MUINO, ALIEN ROY 3528 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 PATEL, PRAKASH N 16309 ABERDEEN WY NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34110 STORWICK, TONY PETER LIBNY STORWICK 3517 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 GONZALEZ, ANTONIO 3045 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 NELSON, JULIUS MICHELINE DENIZE NELSON 1291 NW 16TH AVE HOLLYWOOD FL UNITED STATES 33028 LOPEZ, RICARDO MAGANA 3840 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 LAZO, OSNAIVY 3830 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 DIAZ, JOSE LUIS CUBILLAS MARIA ELENA RIVERA CLAVIJO BARBARA A GARCIA ARTIGAS YANIEL RODRIGUEZ 3822 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 BREMER, CHRISTOPHER C JENNIFER BREMER 785-F MEADOWLAND DR NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34108 HUMES, STEVEN G & MERCEDES 3790 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 BARROSO, ELIGIO MARTINEZ 2580 37TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 WILSON TR, GEORGE G RITA M WILSON TR KIM M SHERMAN TR UTD 6/16/05 10220 FAIRWAY DR ELLICOTT CITY MD UNITED STATES 21042 PEREZ, JOSE 2141 NE 179TH ST N MIAMI BCH FL UNITED STATES 33162 GARCIA JR, RONALD W & NICOLE 3720 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 PINEDA, MARIA FERNANDA 5527 NW 125TH TER CORAL SPRINGS FL UNITED STATES 33076 WIGGINS, CHRISTOPHER KRISTEN ANN SUMMERALLS 3670 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MOROTTO TR, JOHN GOLDEN GATE EST REALTY TRUST 122 LEXINGTON ST WOBURN MA UNITED STATES 01801 JASS FL INVESTMENTS LLC 716 LANDOVER CIR #201 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34104 TAYLOR SR, RODNEY L LISA MARIE TAYLOR 3630 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 GASPAR, ELIEZER J ALYSSA ROSE MUNOZ 3620 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 Page 1418 of 4908 SOTOLONGO, DANI 3610 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 HUYNH, LOAN 1276 ENBROOK LOOP NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34114 BRETOS, TOMAS D & EULALIA C 1220 SW 143RD AVE MIAMI FL UNITED STATES 33184 VALDEZ, EDGAR 5350 WARREN ST NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34113 VICE INVESTMENT CORP 16845 NW 78TH AVE MIAMI LAKES FL UNITED STATES 33016 GONZALEZ, GONZALO E ERIC GONZALEZ 299 E 39TH PL HIALEAH FL UNITED STATES 33013 MOLINA, AURORA 13737 SW 9TH TER MIAMI FL UNITED STATES 33184 DENIS CARPENTRY LLC 4274 6TH AVE S E NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34117 P&J FLORIDA LLC 175 GREAT NECK RD STE 407 GREAT NECK NY UNITED STATES 11021 HELMER TR, JAMES & MARTA A HELMER FAMILY TRUST UTD 11/19/04 1780 HILLCREST DR VENTURA CA UNITED STATES 93001 CALZADILLA, A LEONEL CARRILLO YAMILEIDIS GARCIA LIRIANO 3480 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ARREDONDO, R CARLOS GARCIA 3470 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 SEGURA, GERMAN D 8101 SW 24TH CT UNIT 407 DAVIE FL UNITED STATES 33324 RAMIREZ, MARIA L 3440 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 BLONDO, ALFREDO MIRELLA SERINO 3430 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 VALDES, JONATAN ALAYNA MARIE PEREIRO 3422 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MGJ INVESTMENTS LLC 3022 2ND ST NW NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 FERNANDEZ, RAUL M 3360 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 COLLINS EST, DOROTHY M C/O P L COLLINS JENSEN PR 1322 JOHNS BLVD RAYMORE MO UNITED STATES 64083 AIME, DAVILES BIEN ROSELINE PETIT FRERE 3352 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 LEJA EST, ADAM % HOPE EASTERLY PR 3340 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 PALMA, ALEX ERICA VELASQUEZ 3330 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 HERNANDEZ, KYRA 3322 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MARTINEZ, JESUS IGNACIO 70 ISLE OF ST THOMAS NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34114 MENENDEZ, LUIS ELVIRA ROMERO 3290 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ABASCAL, ARTURO A ALINA ABASCAL 408 W 16TH ST HIALEAH FL UNITED STATES 33010 JAMES, ABASI & MAEVA 3272 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 BETANCOURT, JAVIER ANDRES 2781 6TH AVE SE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34117 PALECEK, EDWARD J & MARILYN R PO BOX 535 LINTHICUM HTS MD UNITED STATES 21090 ADAMIK, PETER LUDMILA KREK 10333 HERITAGE BAY BLVD #1712 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 EDON INC 3210 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 LYNCH JR, EDWIN M 3210 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 JOSEPH & MARY PRUSH TRUST 665 VINTAGE RESERVE CIR #9C NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34119 SARDINAS, PABLO 20261 SW 316 ST HOMESTEAD FL UNITED STATES 33030 DELGADO, ROXANA 2990 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 CURBELO, JORGE L FLORES ANISLEIDY GUERRA VALDES 2980 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 FAMULARE, EDWARD J & KATHLEEN 2970 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 GRANT, PAUL 2940 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 LINDSEY, MIRACLE ANTHONY CADET 2930 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 VALYKEO, EDWARD ALLEN 2920 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 THOMSON, ANDREA 1075 SPACE PARK WAY #221 MOUNTAIN VIEW CA UNITED STATES 94043 COLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34104 ANEETA SHAILESH LIVING TRUST 3029 NEWPORT DR SPRINGFIELD IL UNITED STATES 62702 SOTO JR, RUPERTO ADELAIDA SOTO 2830 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 SOTO JR, ROBERTO & ADELAIDA 2830 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 GUTIERREZ, RADIEL 2782 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 GONGORA, PEDRO F 2760 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 RAMOS, ARIEL DUNIA GARCIA RAMIRES 2748 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 SUAREZ, ENRIQUE ALBERTO M 2740 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 OBERLIES EST, DEBORAH L 2730 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ORTEGA, HECTOR F 2720 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 CUBAS, LUIS GUILLERMO YOLANDA CORTIJO CUBAS 17011 N BAY RD APT 801 SUNNY ISLES BEAC FL UNITED STATES 33160 BAUMGART II, RONALD ALFRED RACHELLE A P BAUMGART 2670 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 RENA LOU WILSON 6035 NORTH WATERBURY ROAD DES MOINES IA UNITED STATES 50312 MUSLIMANI, RAY PO BOX 110127 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34108 Page 1419 of 4908 GUZMELI, BARBARA 2618 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 GARCIA, MARIO 5730 W 14TH AVE HIALEAH FL UNITED STATES 33012 GODOY, ALAN & CINDY 2540 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 GODOY, ALEXIS & TAYME 2540 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 GODOY JR, ALEX CORINA FELICIA GODOY 2540 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 NUNEZ, JUAN J & VIVIAN 2480 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MENEJIAS, MARCELO MARICELA MENEJIAS LORENZO 2460 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 GONZALEZ, ZUZEL ANTONIA R GARCIA LOZANO 2440 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ARIAS DEOLIVARES, EVANGELINA 2430 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 HERNANDEZ, ELIECER OLANO 2420 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 FERNANDEZ, DAISY MARINA 2390 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 PARMAR REV LIVING TRUST 1464 SUTTER BUTTES ST CHULA VISTA CA UNITED STATES 91913 PEREZ, ARMANDO T 2330 35TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 SCHMIDT, LADONNA K KEVIN J SCHMIDT 106 BLOOMINGFIELD DR BRANDON FL UNITED STATES 33511 GRMD INVESTMENTS LLC 11400 SW 43 TERR MIAMI FL UNITED STATES 33165 COLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34104 NOEL, JOSEPH ROSE JEAN 3445 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 WENDEL, WILLIAM ROY 3431 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 RIBISI, CHRISTIAN & NORMA 3415 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 COLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34104 COLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34104 COLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34104 COLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34104 COLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34104 COLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34104 BALSEMO, FRANCESCO CARMEN UZCATEGUL 14743 INDIGO LAKES CIR NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34119 PORTER, TIMOTHY ALFREDO D FERNANDEZ 3915 33RD AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 SUNSHINE FL APARTMENTS INC 158 7TH ST NW NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 SUNSHINE FL APARTMENTS INC 158 7TH ST NW NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 VARGHESE, GEORGE CHECHAMMA GEORGE 703 SHERMAN AVE THORNWOOD NY UNITED STATES 10594 VARGHESE, GEORGE CHECHAMMA GEORGE 703 SHERMAN AVE THORNWOOD NY UNITED STATES 10594 ALVARADO, ANA ALEX PINTO KEVIN ALEXIS PINTO 3671 33RD AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 RIVAS-RIVERA, CARLOS A JACLYN PROFFITT 5111 GENOA ST AVE MARIA FL UNITED STATES 34142 JOSE & JUANITA PINEDA R/TRUST 3585 33RD AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 OBREGON, ANTHONY JOSEPH WALSH IVONNE ROSAS LOPEZ 4905 BARCELONA CIR NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34112 SANJAY DEO REV TRUST MANISH NAGPAL ASHISH DHAM 4836 CHARDONNAY DR CORAL SPRINGS FL UNITED STATES 33067 GALLARDO, EUGENIO 3822 SW 171 AVE MIRAMAR FL UNITED STATES 33027 FERNANDEZ, JULIO L & GINAKARNA 3333 33RD AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 HITTINGER TR, HELMUT & LYNDA HELMUT HITTINGER R/T 4-29-91 530 RIDGEWOOD ST ALTAMONTE SPRING FL UNITED STATES 32701 HITTINGER TR, HELMUT & LYNDA HELMUT HITTINGER R/T 4-29-91 530 RIDGEWOOD ST ALTAMONTE SPRING FL UNITED STATES 32701 HITTINGER TR, HELMUT & LYNDA HELMUT HITTINGER R/T 4-29-91 533 RIDGEWOOD ST ALTAMONTE SPRNGS FL UNITED STATES 32701 HITTINGER TR, HELMUT & LYNDA HELMUT HITTINGER R/T 4-29-91 530 RIDGEWOOD ST ALTAMONTE SPRNGS FL UNITED STATES 32701 EVEROIL LLC 613 CORBEL DR NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34110 FLEMING, LANCE J & TAMMI S 3040 OIL WELL RD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 SAN LAZARO INVESTMENTS LLC 3506 E 23RD ST ALVA FL UNITED STATES 33920 SAN LAZARO INVESTMENTS LLC 3506 E 23RD ST ALVA FL UNITED STATES 33920 EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH OF NA INC 777 MOORING LINE DR NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34102 EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH OF NAPLES INC 777 MOORING LINE DR NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34102 EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH OF NAPLES INC 777 MOORING LINE DR NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34102 EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH OF NAPLES INC 777 MOORING LINE DR NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34102 ROBERTS, MARK 2660 OIL WELL RD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 WALSH, BONNIE L JOLLY 2400 OIL WELL RD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ILAGAN, EMILIANO & LOLITA 6906 LA MIRADA DR HOUSTON TX UNITED STATES 77083 QUENALLATA, LUIS FERNANDO ANA OROZCO 14634 SW 132ND AVE MIAMI FL UNITED STATES 33186 KIBRIA FAMILY TRUST 5741 GOLDEN OAKS LN NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34119 Page 1420 of 4908 QUENALLATA, LUIS FERNANDO ANA OROZCO 14634 SW 132ND AVE MIAMI FL UNITED STATES 33186 HERNANDEZ, IRASHEMA PO BOX 1344 ESTERO FL UNITED STATES 33929 COOK, ANNE GARRIS 3930 33RD AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 HAIM BENZINO REV LIV TRUST 10777 W SAMPLE RD #716 CORAL SPRINGS FL UNITED STATES 33065 ALEMAN, DABEIBA ROBERTO SANCHEZ 19471 NW 7TH ST PEMBROKE PINES FL UNITED STATES 33029 ALVAREZ, ANGELA ALVAREZ, MIGUEL & CHRISTINE 8025 NW 185 TERR MIAMI FL UNITED STATES 33015 CAMPS, YANEISY & JUAN A 3830 33RD AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 CARRASCO, ISAEL 3790 33RD AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 CARRASCO, ISAEL 3790 33RD AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 STEVES, LORENZO RAMIREZ ELIDA LOPEZ 3782 33RD AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 SANTOS, KAREN GANZO JULIO H SOTO SWABY 3770 33RD AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ARIE, EDUARDO E 3760 33RD AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 FERNANDEZ, JOANNA JUAN R FERNANDEZ 3746 33RD AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 BLACKBURN, DONNA L 3730 33RD AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 GAUT, MARTIN EDWARD TINA RENEE WARREN 3710 33RD AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 CASTANO, ELIZABETH R 3680 33RD AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 E S & P C PISANO REV LIV TRUST 3660 33RD AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 OSORIO SANCIPRIAN, PEDRO 3646 33RD AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 GUERRERO, ROLANDO HERRERA 3630 33RD AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 HC & SONS LLC 25211 PINSON DR BONITA SPRINGS FL UNITED STATES 34135 MEZA, PEDRO 3845 41ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 TRIPI, LEWIS N9189 WEST RD WATERTOWN WI UNITED STATES 53094 YAKIMO, ALLEN & KATHLEEN 264 N ROUTE 183 POTTSVILLE PA UNITED STATES 17901 GARCIA, LUBIA ALVAREZ JORGE LUIS ROGRIGUEZ LIMA 3540 33RD AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 JUSTE, BERNADE B 3530 33RD AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 SAAVEDRA, JAVIER ELSA ABARCA 18860 NW 78TH PL HIALEAH FL UNITED STATES 33015 PINEDA SR, JOSE G 3585 33RD AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 CABRERA, ANA D 79 SUMMER ST SALEM MA UNITED STATES 01970 HARRIS, KENNETH R 1701 S OLIVE AVE WEST PALM BEACH FL UNITED STATES 33401 STEWART, KEATON C 3470 33RD AVENUE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 JENNETTE, SARA JANE 7023 BELLARD CT RALEIGH NC UNITED STATES 27617 PRIETO, PEDRO PABLO YAIMA GONZALEZ PENA 3432 33RD AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 QUINTERO, ANA C 17111 BISCAYNE BLVD N MIAMI BCH FL UNITED STATES 33160 CADAVID,ALEJANDRO JASON JIMENEZ 5201 RISING COMET LANE LAKE WORTH FL UNITED STATES 33463 GONZALEZ, ROY 3390 33RD AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 KLEIN, LILA JOSE TRINIDAD 1931 NE 188TH ST MIAMI FL UNITED STATES 33179 SANTILLI, MARLENE J 224 OWL CT FREMONT CA UNITED STATES 94539 FLOOD, BENJAMIN P & MEGAN J 3360 33RD AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 NAFDOF PRIVATE SERIES 1 LLC 2316 PINE RIDGE RD #453 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34109 REYES, GILBERTO ROBERTO REYES 3330 33RD AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 TALLEYRAND, ROMANE NADINE B TALLEYRAND 3320 33RD AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ABOVE HOMES CORPORATION 6836 IL REGALO CIR NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34109 JOHNSON, CHRISTOPHER L CECILI M JOHNSON 3280 33RD AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 PRAT, MARIA ESTHER 4430 WILSON BLVD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 CHARLES, EMMANUELLA GUERRIER 3264 33RD AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 BAADER, FRANK 3256 33RD AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 CHASTAIN, RODNEY G 3240 33RD AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 SAINI, HARVINDERSINGH H 3230 33RD AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 KRONZ, JONATHAN CHRISTOPHER 3224 33RD AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 WERSHING ET UX, R J 4710 POWERS FERRY RD ATLANTA GA UNITED STATES 30327 MARTINEZ MORENO, ARNALDO BARBARITA VALDES SANTOVENIA 3290 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 RICHARD FRANKLIN BERMAN TRUST 611 1ST ST SW NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34117 EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH OF NA INC 777 MOORING LINE DR NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34102 EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH OF NAPLES INC 777 MOORING LINE DR NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34102 DE ZAYAS, FIDEL GOMEZ D CAROLINA SOLANO ESCOBAR 2680 OIL WELL RD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 Page 1421 of 4908 ILAGAN, EMILIANO & LOLITA 6906 LA MIRADA DR HOUSTON TX UNITED STATES 77083 QUENALLATA, LUIS FERNANDO ANA OROZCO 14634 SW 132ND AVE MIAMI FL UNITED STATES 33186 CASEY, JOHN R & MARIA 3280 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 COBO, ALEXANDRA XIMEDA PINEDA GABRIEL R ALONSO 3270 EVERGLADES BLD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 HC & SONS LLC 25211 PINSON DR BONITA SPRINGS FL UNITED STATES 34135 MENA, JOSE CASTRO YOAIMA MIRANDA NARDO 3240 EVERGLADES BVLD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 WGA HOMES INC 3210 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ALONSO, GUILLERMO 3210 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 SCAGLIA, PABLO & VANESSA 674 NW 134TH PL MIAMI FL UNITED STATES 33182 PBMB & LB INVESTMENTS INC 10630 NW 37TH TER DORAL FL UNITED STATES 33178 LOPEZ, PEDRO 3957 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 SOUTHWEST PERMACULTURE LLC 2921 SHERMAN AVE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ABSI, PHILIP E & GLORIA T 3790 S OLD 3C HWY GALENA OH UNITED STATES 43021 HERNANDEZ, ESTELA 3845 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 LOPEZ, SUSANA 39 STONEHURST LN DIX HILLS NY UNITED STATES 11746 SOLIS, VALIA 3795 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 SOLIS, VALIA 3790 33RD AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ALVAREZ, ERNESTO 3775 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ALVAREZ, ERNESTO 3775 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 FERREIRA, JOHN H BEATRIZ REYES 14694 SW 46TH TER MIAMI FL UNITED STATES 33175 CHARLES, CEDERNE MISLAINE GASPARD 5419 19TH PL SW NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34116 LORIGA, NELVYS DUQUE 3725 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 VALDES-LOPEZ, ALFREDO ASTRY MONTES 3695 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 CALCIANO, MICHAEL D DANIELA S CALCIANO 3685 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 FERNANDEZ, EDENY 3015 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 COHEN, ORLANDO DIANA FIGUEROA VEGA DAVID SALOMON COHEN 3645 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 RAMOS, JOSE M & MARIA A 3635 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 CRUZ, DANIEL JAQUELINE I HERNANDEZ ROBLERO 3625 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MARAGH, RAMA N & LOUISE L 7451 SW 132ND AVE MIAMI FL UNITED STATES 33183 RIVERA, ANTONIA 3595 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 HERNANDEZ, ELBIS 3575 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 TASSY, ROBENS 3565 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MONTALBAN, ANGEL 3545 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MONTALBAN, ANGEL 3545 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MONTALBAN, ANGEL 3545 31ST NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 BOERO, LEYSITH 3491 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 GARCIA, RAMON 2730 6TH AVENUE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 DUNCKLEY, JASON & LAURA 171 KIRKLAND DR NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34110 PRZYGODSKI, JOEL DONNY PRZYGODSKI LESLEE PRZYGODSKI 513 RED MAPLE DR TECUMSEN MI UNITED STATES 49286 ARIAS, DAX OMAR PECHO 5290 GOLDEN GATE PKWY NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34116 ARIAS, DAX OMAR PECHO 5290 GOLDEN GATE PKWY NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34116 VALENTINO, CLAIRE JAMES L EGOLF 2011 LIV TRUST 11764 NEW BUFFALO RD NORTH LIMA OH UNITED STATES 44452 HERRERA, MIGUEL F & NORMA C 3317 S TOWNER ST SANTA ANA CA UNITED STATES 92707 EDWARDS, LINCOLN PAUL 1810 GLOVER ST REDLANDS CA UNITED STATES 92374 FRANCO, GABY S YASIEL DEPEW FERNANDEZ 3335 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 DEL SOL, JORGE LUIS GRANEY MOREJON PINO 3319 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 AVILA, GILBERTO TORO DAYRIS SOCARRAS 3315 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 HARRADEN, JONATHAN M 3295 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 SHEPHERD, LANNY CARL 8 EAGLE GLENN COVE LITTLE ROCK AR UNITED STATES 72223 HERNANDEZ, JULIA & GEORGE PO BOX 227584 12254 SW 1ST ST MIAMI FL UNITED STATES 33222 ALFANO, DANIEL & THERESA 726 AVENUE T BROOKLYN NY UNITED STATES 11223 SMITH, TINA JOY CHAD ERIC BROWN 3245 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 HERNANDEZ, LUIS 3235 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MEJIA, RUBEN DIANA CRUZ 3225 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 JEAN LOUIS, MIRLENE BERNADIN JORDANIS JEAN LOUIS 3211 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 Page 1422 of 4908 OCAMPO SR, EDGARDO & ELVIRA 2904 UNIVERSITY AVE WAUKEGAN IL UNITED STATES 60085 FLEMING, LANCE J & TAMI S 3040 OIL WELL RD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 BUSSARD, DANIEL A & AMANDA D 2995 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ROJAS, ARLEY LOPEZ KATIUSKA BALBERAN ALMEIDA 2985 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 RODRIGUEZ, YULEINY CERVANTES 2975 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 TORO GRADING CORP 3315 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH OF NA INC 777 MOORING LINE DR NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34102 EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH OF NA INC 777 MOORING LINE DR NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34102 EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH OF NA INC 777 MOORING LINE DR NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34102 KATOUCHIS, JOHN 2899 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 SOSA, PEDRO A & ISABEL M 940 W 43RD ST HIALEAH FL UNITED STATES 33012 GALVIN, LINDA L 2845 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MARTINEZ, ANTONIO 2835 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MCDONALD, SHANE 2795 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 GOEDEKE, MARGARITA MADERA 2785 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 WILLIAMS JR, MICHAEL C 165 CORNERSTONE DR FRANKLIN NC UNITED STATES 27525 PADILLA, JAIME L 3413 TISDALE DR LEXINGTON KY UNITED STATES 40503 FERRERA, HUMBERTO 2731 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 AZUA, ROGELIO & MAGDA ELENA 2725 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 KIRNON, ANNA LOUISE ANTOINE ALDRIC KIRNON 2685 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 JOSEPH, BOBBY 2595 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 SUNSHINE HOME CLNG & CARE LLC 2575 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 OGDEN, MARGARET M 11 N HONEYMAN RD WHITE HSE STA NJ UNITED STATES 08889 HINES, MICHAEL & TAMARA 2525 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MACIER, JERRY D 2495 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MAGUR, GEORGE P MARILYN A MAGUR EDWARD G MAGUR ANN MARIE MAGUR 16 VISTAVIEW LN #119 ENDWELL NY UNITED STATES 13760 TROMBLEYJENNIFER 1436 KIWI COURT PUNTA GORDA FL UNITED STATES 33950 MEDINA, JUAN ARIEL SARIAM JACOMINO 2461 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 EUBANKS, NADINE 2443 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ZALAZAR, RITA EVANGELINA 2435 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 CESAR, MARIE L 2421 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 CARTER, KENNETH BRIAN TRACEY JEAN CARTER 2405 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 LD NAPLES TRUCKING INC 531 13TH ST NW NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 RODRIGUEZ, CAMILO 2385 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 GORDON SR, STEVEN J & ROBIN L 2365 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 IMONDI, PAIGE & CHARLES A 2345 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 PHL CAPITAL INC 1241 19TH ST SW NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34117 INNOCENT, DAVIDSON 3174 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 FLEMING, LANCE & TAMI 3040 OIL WELL ROAD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 RODRIGUEZ, JORGE L & ANABEL 3160 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MERAN, CARLOS J 3147 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 CARRILLO, CONSTAIN 8760 SW 133RD AVE RD #418 MIAMI FL UNITED STATES 33183 JOHNSON, WALFI M & ELMA I % JULIE WILSON 227 BROOKSIDE BLVD HINCKLEY OH UNITED STATES 44233 MARCELO & LILLIAM MERCADO REVOCABLE TRUST 3125 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 CARLYLE, KEVIN TRICIA YOUMANS 4566 N LAKE DR SARASOTA FL UNITED STATES 34232 MOORE EST, HOMER W % ANITA CLAIR PRICE 1040 LOWER BELLBROOK RD XENIA OH UNITED STATES 45385 FORCE, TIMOTHY WAYNE DENISE ANN FORCE 3960 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 LUTHER, CHRISTOPHER JOHN 3940 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 TESAURO III, JOSEPH F 1163 TRENTON HARBOURTON RD TITUSYVILLE NJ UNITED STATES 08560 DORVAL, TERRY J ROSELYNE CADET 3840 45TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 RIVAS, RAUDEL DIANA AGUSTIN 3830 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ROBERTS, WILLIAM & CHARITY 3790 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 PAOLETTI, LOUIS A LISA CHAIKA 3780 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 HO EST, JIMMY YU LANG % ANDREA HO STEIN & DINAH H CARROLL TRUSTEES 2854 RANCHO CORTES CARLSBAD CA UNITED STATES 92009 DELEON, DOUGLAS 3740 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 Page 1423 of 4908 SANCHEZ, SILVIA & RICARDO 3730 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 LEITH, ROGER D & SUE E 3720 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 GARCIA, JOSE R VASQUEZ GLENDA C CASTRO GUZMAN 3690 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 VALDES, JOSE FONTE 3680 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 FONTE, JOSE IRIS ARBOLAEZ 3680 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 LYLES, DEBORAH J MICHAEL A LYLES 3660 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 GARCIA, RAMON & MARGARITA 3640 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 VAN WINKLE, MAURINE 6833 FERSTEL RD NEWBURGH IN UNITED STATES 47630 ABOVE HOMES CORPORATION 6836 IL REGALO CIR NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34109 REGALADO, MARLENE DE LA C Z MIRIEL PULIDO GUERRA 3590 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 FAN FAN, GAMALIEL 3570 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 LITTAU ET UX, WM 1205 W 26TH ST S INDEPENDENCE MO UNITED STATES 64052 LORI JEAN DIMMICK LIV TRUST 3360 CAYMAN LANE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34119 GUCIK, SIGISMUND 5310 MCBRIDE AVE CLEVELAND OH UNITED STATES 44127 KENNEDY, JOSEPH E 85PARK AVE ROCHESTER NY UNITED STATES 14607 WILLIAMSON EST, J A % SUSAN E SMITH 932 PATTERSON RD DOURD DUMMER ON CANADA K0L 2H0 SOLORIO, JOSE GARCIA 3282 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 BATISTA, RAMON ALINA CASTELLANOS 3470 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MELUCCI, MARIO MICHAEL 3460 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 HC & SONS LLC 25211 PINSON DR BONITA SPRINGS FL UNITED STATES 34135 SOLA, ELSA MADIAN I LOPEZ GRACIELA M GOMEZ 6641 SW 5TH ST PEMBROKE PINES FL UNITED STATES 33023 ROMERO RAMOS, LILI MARLENY LUIS ARMANDO ROMERO AREVALO 732 LONG LINES LN LEHIGH ACRES FL UNITED STATES 33974 ROE, MICHAEL ALAN & TARA JEAN 3390 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ROBERSON, CHAD M & DANIELLE D 3380 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ARANGUREN, JUAN C HERNANDEZ CRISTINA ZAMORA 3370 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 HTH GROUP INC 5455 SW 8TH STREET STE 210 MIAMI FL UNITED STATES 33134 MARTINEZ, JORGE L 3125 52ND ST SW NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34116 PLANTIN, JUNIOR 3330 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 PEREZ, RICHARD S LUZIA DOS REIS PEREZ 5820 NE 22ND WAY #603 FORT LAUDERDALE FL UNITED STATES 33308 CABALLERO, CYNTHIA 1511 N 70TH WAY HOLLYWOOD FL UNITED STATES 33024 GARCIA, JOSE 3282 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 LOPEZ, ILAN RODRIGUEZ ARIAGNA CORDERO ORTIZ 3274 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ROTTIERS, RAFAEL & FELICITAS V 3268 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MCGOWAN, ROBERT WILLIAM MARIA ELENA MCGOWAN 3260 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 VARELA, DARIEL RAMOS 3240 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 CERVANTES, YAUMEL GLORYSELL FIORES 3234 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 GALLAGHER, KEVIN & KRISTEN 11807 KENT GROVE DR SPRING HILL FL UNITED STATES 34610 PAZ, LINDA L 755 NW 80TH ST MIAMI FL UNITED STATES 33150 BEDARD, DWINELL & ALISSA 3170 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 CASTILLO, GABRIEL & MARIA I 5406 TRAMMEL ST NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34113 M&M LAND TRUST 8260 SW 182ND ST PALMETTO BAY FL UNITED STATES 33157 KUNTZ, JOHN E & MARY A 260 WESTBROOK DR TOMS RIVER NJ UNITED STATES 08757 RENTERIA, MARIA G HILARIO ROGRIGUEZ-MENDEZ 2980 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ROMERO, KATHERINE M CELINA M MIJANGO 3745 41ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 GONZALEZ, BEATRIZ M HERNANDEZ HUGO HERNANDEZ VAZQUEZ 121 20TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ROMERO, C MARISELA MIJANGO 3745 41ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 LINDOR, FRANTZ STEVENSON 2926 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 PEREZ, JUAN MIGUEL 2914 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 CONGINE JR, VITO J & TRUDY L 2894 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 CONGINE JR, VITO J & TRUDY L 2894 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 REYMARRE CORP 821 NW 32 CT MIAMI FL UNITED STATES 33125 HARRIS, STEVEN N 2840 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 GAVINA, JESUS CANO RAQUEL CANO 2830 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 PEREZ, RAFAEL 17220 SW 146TH CT MIAMI FL UNITED STATES 33177 CATALANO, CHRISTOPHER 3645 CITRUS TRACE UNIT 6 DAVIE FL UNITED STATES 33328 Page 1424 of 4908 SANCHEZ, FRANCISCO ACOSTA MARLON J ACOSTA 2786 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 GRAY, TYLER 2770 31ST ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 CUNNINGHAM, BEVERLEY CARENE N CUNNINGHAM DONNA GINTER 2760 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 CUEVAS, LILLIAN 2740 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ST CYR, JOSUE & MALIA FAUSTIN DANIEL LOUIS MARIE MAGDALA HILAIRE 2730 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ULTIMATE REALTY INVESTS LLC 1240 23RD ST SW NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34117 LAURORE, SANDY 2680 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 DEL VALLE, MARCOS U 2672 31ST AVE N E NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 SELVA, CELESTE V HENRY B SELVA JR PO BOX 830669 MIAMI FL UNITED STATES 33283 JOHNSON, GARY E 2640 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 HAM, EMILIO A & EDA E 12221 SW 24TH TER MIAMI FL UNITED STATES 33175 DOGER FAMILY TRUST 1441 SW 139TH AVE MIAMI FL UNITED STATES 33184 NACHAMPASSAK, ANOUVONG PHETHOUDONE L NACHAMPASSAK 2550 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 2540 31ST AVE NE LLC 3430 13TH AVE SW NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34117 BURTON, RAE ANN 2530 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 WOOD II, MICHAEL M & LAURA N 2520 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 GARCIA, DIANA C 2480 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 GLORIA ESTHER CRUZ TRUST 600 BILTMORE WAY APT 709 CORAL GABLES FL UNITED STATES 33134 BEDOYA, MAURICIO A JULIANA A OROZCO 2460 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 SULLIVAN, CORNELIUS 2440 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 CRUZ, JUAN 560 E 58TH ST HIALEAH FL UNITED STATES 33013 MORAN, SANDRA GERALDO ORTIZ 2416 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MOODY, ERIC DAVID NORMA AGNES MOODY 2404 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 RODRIGUEZ, FRANCISCO 2390 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 RUZ, DULCE M 2380 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ANGELO, JUSTIN 2370 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 HAYES, JAMES DOUGLAS SHELLI JO HAYES 2362 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 LESLIE, BRIAN & NATALIA 2322 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 PARDO, PEDRO & MERCEDES D 2910 GOLDEN GATE BLVD W NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MICHAELIS, PAOLA MENDEZ 411 18TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 GAMA, LAURA JASON MATTHEW HAMMOND 3045 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 RAMIREZ, BARBARA 3030 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 LOPEZ, MARLON CASTRO KAILIN AYALA ARMERO 3025 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ROBERT L HILL JR FAMILY TRUST 985 1ST AVE S NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34102 FERNANDEZ, EDENY 3015 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MARTINEZ, RUBEN & GLORIA 3005 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34116 HOUSE TRUST 3943 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ROBERTS, JEFFERY L LISA M WOFFINDEN 6036 JAPONICA CT NEW PT RICHEY FL UNITED STATES 34655 RODRIGUEZ, NEARELYS JULIO C RODRIGUEZ 3931 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 RAMIREZ, SAMUEL & ELISA PO BOX 1830 IMMOKALEE FL UNITED STATES 34143 DE LA ROSA, LISSETT JOSE LUIS DE LA ROSA 3865 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 CARLOS L & VILMA M RIVERA TRST 3845 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 SOUTHWEST NETWORK SUPPORT INC 401K PROFIT SHARING PLAN TRUST 2921 SHERMAN AVE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 PEAK, DENZIL & ROSE 837 NW 130TH TER SUNRISE FL UNITED STATES 33325 GATOR INVESTMENT OF SW FLA INC 4184 6TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MAPES, MARIBEL F RYAN M SANTOS 3783 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 LENTO, DOMINICK & ALYCIA 3775 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 TALLEY, APRIL NICHOLL 3765 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ACOSTA, FIDEL DAVID ACOSTA, MARIA E & FIDEL 3745 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 PENTZ, BETHANN 15 RED MILL ROAD ETTERS PA UNITED STATES 17319 DUNN, CONOR CAROLINE C COVONE 3715 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 DUBRAVA, LAWRENCE 25 SORGHUM RD SHELTON CT UNITED STATES 06484 KOELSCH, LINDA 7506 W 5 MILE RD # A FRANKSVILLE WI UNITED STATES 53126 NICOLAS, BENCHY & MILDRED 3675 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MERZEAU, GRACIELA 3665 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 Page 1425 of 4908 PEREZ, ELIADES & ANA 3645 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34117 ZALDIVAR, LEONEL 15316 MARKHAM DR CLERMONT FL UNITED STATES 34714 MGJ INVESTMENTS LLC 3022 2ND ST SW NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ZUFERRI, EDUARDO J & AIDA L 3591 29TH AVE N E NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 FASCHING, SAMANTHA 3585 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 VAN HORN, SANDRA H & ROBERT M 3573 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ADIR, MARYLEXIS 3565 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 KOBLEUR JR, RICHARD & MARIA 3545 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 OLSZEWSKI, DARIUSZ BOGUSLAW URSULA OLSZEWSKI 18406 ARAPAHOE CIR PORT CHARLOTTE FL UNITED STATES 33948 FERDOWSIEPOUR, GHOLAM NOOSHI SALEHI 1312 NW 89TH TER PEMBROKE PINES FL UNITED STATES 33024 LEODAN LLC 591 SEAVIEW CT #402 MARCO ISLAND FL UNITED STATES 34145 JORAWAR-BHIMSEN, URMILLA 226 BURNS ST SOMERSET NJ UNITED STATES 08873 ALVAREZ, OSCAR 2840 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 RODRIGUEZ, YADIR LAURA DELGADO 2930 TROPICANA BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34116 STANLEY, SUZANNE S & BRYAN D 3415 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 KRUEGER, JAMES A 120 N HOWARD RD CURTICE OH UNITED STATES 43412 RAMIREZ, JOSE R & NEYSI 460 24TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 NACIUS, THONISE IBERNA LOMME 3375 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 CAMACHO, ERICK YAIMA FINOL 3345 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 DAVILA, LUIS 3325 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 LAROSE, GRANT T & SHEILA M 3295 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 FORTE, JUANA M ANGELA FORTE 3285 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 RUBIO, LUZ LAZO CATHERINE RUBIO CACHO 3275 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MAY, LAWRENCE E 4405 MACNISH ST APT 2D ELMHURST NY UNITED STATES 11373 REYES, PAOLA A 3245 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 BROWN, ROBERT ANDREW 419 WESTSIDE BLVD CATONSVILLE MD UNITED STATES 21228 RODRIGUEZ, LAZARA MUNOZ 3229 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ALMODOVAR, ANTONIO LISA EMILY THOMAS 3225 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 RENDA, MICHAEL & MARIA 11 PEARL ST WHITE HSE STA NJ UNITED STATES 08889 MUNOZ HOMES LLC 12751 SW 47TH TERR MIAMI FL UNITED STATES 33175 RAMIREZ, MITCHELL 3650 15TH AVE S W NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34117 SANDSTEDT, MELISSA 2967 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 BLOCKER EST, BRUCE % DEAN M BLOCKER PR 1303 NEW MARKET RD W IMMOKALEE FL UNITED STATES 34142 MOORE LIVING TRUST THE 13 ROSEDALE APTS HERSHEY PA UNITED STATES 17033 GUTIERREZ, ANDREA ALEJANDRA GUTIERREZ 2925 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MATAMOROS, MARCIO BLADIMIR 2911 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ROBINSON, PAUL & ALDITH 2895 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 SANCHEZ, MERCEDES 2885 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 PINEDA, MARIO A 2875 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 CONTRERAS OLIVO, YORVIN G 310 4TH ST SE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34117 HERRERA, NIURKA 2835 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 HERRERA, NIURKA JOSE R RODRIGUEZ 2835 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MADRIGAL, HECTOR MANUEL JANNIS MADRIGAL 2825 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 SABINA, GILBERTO LUZ M CALERO 14256 SW 23RD ST MIAMI FL UNITED STATES 33175 BERMUDEZ, VICTOR R & JESSICA 2785 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ALVAREZ, ANAIS 2775 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ESPINOSA, HEIKEL MILENA Y VILR LAUZAO 2745 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 RUTEAGA, ISAAC 2735 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 VILAR, DUNIA PRIETO ROSA E VILLAR 11706 SW 106 TERR MIAMI FL UNITED STATES 33186 KEMM, CHRISTOPHER E 2685 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 CHAMBERLAND, ROLAND J 2665 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MIRAMAR SOLUTION GROUP INC 2791 GOLDEN GATE BLVD E NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 CONIGLIARO, GIOVANNI 14629 BEAUFORT CIR NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34119 ALMAGUER BATISTA, ALCIDES 2585 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 SHEPARD, MOLLY LYNNE RYAN M SHEPARD 2565 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 Page 1426 of 4908 MARRERO, DAYAN AREIDA MARRERO 2557 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 GARCIA, ALBERTO, A & NOEMI 2545 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MENDEZ, JUAN M MARIA I RAMIREZ-SANTANA 2535 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 PORRAS, CRISTOBAL MARIA DE LOS ANGELES GONZALEZ 4500 28 AVE SW NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34116 BANUELOS, LEOBARDO 2497 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 VANNATTEN, DENISE 2475 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 INFANTE, ROLANDO DASHIELL 2469 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 NELSON, RODNEY R & KATHLEEN L 2443 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MACIAS, JOSE M & MYRA 2435 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 WASILEWSKI, DAVID J DEBORAH A WASILEWSKI 2421 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 STOVALL, STEVEN M CYNTHIA HERRERA STOVALL PAMELA WOOD 2385 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 LAWRENCE TR, L C 3870 25TH AVE SW NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34117 MIXAN ET AL, JACOB D ROSEMARY H CHURCH CHARLES MIXAN ANTHONY MIXAN 6050 SEWARD ST OMAHA NE UNITED STATES 68104 DALBY FAMILY TRUST 9319 FIELDSTONE LN NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 TANQUILUT, MARLENE J 34446 N EASTINGS WAY GURNEE IL UNITED STATES 60031 FREDERICKS, HAROLD E JUSTINE WILLIAMS 2944 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 CHARLES MARIE L LEONCE SYLVESTRE 5419 19TH PL SW NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34116 CANEL, JACKENSON PIERRE FRADNA SEPPE 2941 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 JULIAN, CLIFFORD A 2930 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 SCHMITT, LAREEN ANN ANDREW MICHAEL SCHMITT 2931 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 GONZALEZ, MARTA REINALDO MARTINEZ 2923 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 BOCIK, GEORGE A 3936 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 RAMIREZ, JOSE R & NEYSI 460 24TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 CITY OF NAPLES 735 8TH ST S NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34102 EPSTEIN, EDWARD R 3844 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 DE HERRERA, YESSICA PENA 3820 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 TEJEDA, JOSE ANTONIO 3790 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 JOHNSON, RYAN ANDREW JESSICA GUIANG JOHNSON 3780 NE 29TH AVE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 GUEVARA, NILSA G JOSE CALVILLO 5436 28TH AVE SW NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34116 LOPEZ, LUIS E VEGA YANET MARTIN PAJON 3762 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 WOLL, STEVEN JAMES WOLL SUSAN THOMPSON 20 WHITTIER ST LYNBROOK NY UNITED STATES 11563 CABRERA, SERGIO E & RITA E 3730 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 OLD TOWNE CONSULTING INC 14991 SAVANNAH DR NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34119 TURNIPSEED, MARLIN E KATHY J LOCKE-TURNIPSEED 3680 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 TURNIPSEED, MARLIN E KATHY J LOCKE-TURNIPSEED 3680 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 TURNIPSEED, MARLIN E & KATHY J 3680 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 COSIMANO, JOSEPH & LAUREN 3662 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ENCARNACION, ELENA CASTRO 3172 18TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 CAIN, MICHELLE LYNN KENNETH FORREST 3630 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 HEREDIA, DANIEL DARIO 3622 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MARTINEZ, ASHLEY 28060 DOVEWOOD CT APT 105 BONITA SPRINGS FL UNITED STATES 34135 FERNANDEZ, LAZARO & YENEY D 3594 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 RIVERO, OSVALDO & YAQUELIN JESSICA RIVERO EDY MONTERO 3580 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34117 GARCIA ROMERO, ALAN FRANCISCO 3039 ELICE WAY NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34119 KIDD, LINDA M 36 LOWER LANE BERLIN CT UNITED STATES 06037 WORKMAN II, DAVID L 2010 WHITE OAK DR MORGANSTOWN WV UNITED STATES 26505 ROSADO, BRANDYN NICOLE 3522 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 CASTILLO, JOSE M & ANGELICA 3510 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MANKINS, DEREK 3490 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 LOPEZ, JUAN FRANCISCO ISRAEL PACHECO 570 NW 123 AVE MIAMI FL UNITED STATES 33182 HENRY, GREG ANTHONIO 3466 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 AMEY, JENNIFER 3440 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 VAIRO, VANESSA J 3430 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 LLOYD, RANDALL S 3420 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 GLORICH HOLDINGS INC PO BOX 170332 HIALEAH FL UNITED STATES 33017 Page 1427 of 4908 GARCIA, ESPERANZA CONTRERAS YOLANDA LLANAS 1530 23RD ST SW NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34117 NUNEZ, DAISY 488 NE 18TH ST #4501 MIAMI FL UNITED STATES 33132 GALICIA, MILTON MARISOL GALICIA 3340 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MONZON, JORGE 3332 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 FERIA, ARTHUR 3320 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 FERIA, ARTHUR & YANARA 3320 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 FERNANDEZ, FRANCISCO E KITTY SHAMEE FERNANDEZ 3290 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 GARCIA, MATTHEW D VIVIAN VALDES 3282 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 AVILEZ, ALLAN & MELISSA 3270 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 SUAREZ SR, ARMANDO & LICY S 3260 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ALFARO, ZULIMA JOSE H ALFARO 3240 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 WEST, ANDREW RICHARD GERREN MARIE WEST 3230 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MARTINEZ, MILDER DELGADO VIRGINIA CADETE LA O 3226 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 GAMARRA, WESLEY D GLORIA RINCON 3220 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 RAMOS PENA, DAVID A 2888 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ADAMS, JIMMY & BRENDA 1228 SANE RD SE DALTON GA UNITED STATES 30721 HANSEN, THOMAS JINE M LESLIE 2988 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MARTINEZ, BASILIO R & DIGNORA 3520 E 9TH CT HIALEAH FL UNITED STATES 33013 VAZQUEZ, JESSIC HECTOR MANUEL VAZQUEZ MARQUEZ 18493 SEBRING RD FORT MYERS FL UNITED STATES 33967 WILLIAM E BROWN REV TRUST 2940 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 CHAVEZ, DEYSI GABRIEL CHAVEZ 2932 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MORENO, MARIO MARITZA MILAGROS MORENO 2920 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 LEDESMA, BEATRIZ HERNANDEZ ORLANDO CAMEJO CARMONA 2912 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 JUREK, NATALIE BLANCO STEPHEN R JUREK 2890 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MADERA, IRAN MUNOZ MAYULI OTERO MEDINA 2880 29TH AVE N E NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 VARGO, BENJAMIN WILLIAM JAMIE MARIE ANDREWS 2870 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 REYES, PERFECTO L & MARTA R 3670 6TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ALVAREZ, COSME D & MARIA I 2840 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 GONZALEZ, OMAYDA DANIEL AYERBE 2830 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 LIGONDE, MARIE L 2824 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 RICO, JOHNNY RICARDO VICTORIA SOLORIO ARREGUIN 2810 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ANDERSON, ROBERT A NANCY JANE ANDERSON 2780 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ECHEMENDIA, VICTOR 2774 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 LINARES, CRISALIDA JOHAN RAFAEL GARTEROI PARRA 2756 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 LOPEZ, GILBERTO & MARIA 11049 SW 3RD ST MIAMI FL UNITED STATES 33174 LOPEZ, LUIS A & JENNIFER GLYNN 2696 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 FRANCOIS, HEROLD 2680 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 TRIANA FAMILY REV LIV TRUST 4150 SW 112TH AVE MIAMI FL UNITED STATES 33165 TRIANA FAMILY REV/LIV TRUST 4150 SW 112TH AVE MIAMI FL UNITED STATES 33165 RIVERA, MONICA FABIOLA 2670 OIL WELL RD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 KLOTZ, APRIL DAWN 2632 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 CARCAMO, SERGIO & FRANCIS A 2620 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MATHEW, LIZZAMMA & JENNIS 8345 PHOENICIAN COURT DAVIE FL UNITED STATES 33328 RODRIGUEZ, ALBERTO & JUANA M 2560 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 GRAY, THOMAS J & SANDRA 2540 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ORTEGA, CHRISTOPHER J 19 FRANK ST AGAWAM MA UNITED STATES 01001 RODRIGUEZ, ROSA A 2520 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MOCK, ZACHERY A 2480 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 BERMUDEZ, MARISA C BERMUDEZ HELEN A & SERGIO 2460 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 SANCHEZ, JESUS YAKELI PADRON GONZALEZ 2442 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 FERAN, JAMES 2430 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 GONZALEZ, CARLOS A 2660 8TH AVE SE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34117 MATHEW REVOCABLE TRUST 830 8TH ST SE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34117 GATOR INVESTMENT OF SW FLA INC 26354 8TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 THOMAS, JANICE JIMMY M THOMAS 7130 BREWSTER LN MISSOURI CITY TX UNITED STATES 77459 Page 1428 of 4908 MATHEW, JOHN JACOB JOHN MATHEW 82 CHESTNUT ST LIVINGSTON NJ UNITED STATES 07039 CIRKSENA, JULIE ANN JENNIFER LEIGH ARON JAMES RICHARD NELSON 16330 BOSTON PKWY CLIVE IA UNITED STATES 50325 LOPEZ, MIRIAM 2870 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 LAKHANI, MEHBOOB 14760 ASHLAND PL DAVIE FL UNITED STATES 33325 GERTRUDE POINT LLC 515 SW 63RD CT MIAMI FL UNITED STATES 33144 GONZALEZ, MICHEL L & EVELYN 2863 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 PIMENTEL, JOSEPH & THANH-THUY 4620 SW 148TH TER MIRAMAR FL UNITED STATES 33027 JUNE D LONG FAMILY TRUST PO BOX 3216 JACKSON WY UNITED STATES 83001 BATISTA JR, PAULO J & NANCY S 101 FAWN LAKE DR DINGMANS FERRY PA UNITED STATES 18328 MONTALVO, DAVID & MARIA B 2827 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ROHWEDER, MICHAEL & CLAIRE 2066 MINNEHAHA AVE E SAINT PAUL MN UNITED STATES 55119 GUTIERREZ, DIONISIO L LEYVA 3845 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 SEVERE, SERGIO & JOHANNA MISSA 3835 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MANNARI, KIMBERLY C & EUGENE 3825 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 CUBAS, ORLANDO EMMA E ALVAREZ 3785 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ABREU SR, SILVIO DORA TORIBIO 3775 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 LOYD, MARILYN J 3765 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 WAGNER, STEVEN R & KAREN M 3745 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ARBOS, REINALDO GICELA ANDRACA 4375 3RD AVE SW N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34117 GUCIK, SIGISMUND 5310 MCBRIDE AVE CLEVELAND OH UNITED STATES 44127 MENENDEZ, JOAQUIN JOAQUIN MENENDEZ JR 3711 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 LOCKE, MICHAEL P 3685 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 IZQUIERDO, DANAYS EDGAR M FLORES 3675 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 PISTORIO EST, ANGELINE 7980 N NOB HILL RD APT 108 TAMARAC FL UNITED STATES 33321 ROWE, CHRISTINE C ROBERT N ROWE JR 4417 RED HOLLY CT CHARLOTTE NC UNITED STATES 28215 JACKO JR ET UX, ANDREW 1306 FRANKLIN LN ROCKAWAY NJ UNITED STATES 07866 TERRERO, RAIZA 3682 YOSEMITE CT NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34116 PAVLOVSKY, VIKTOR MARINALURYE 29 PANTANO DR VAUGHAN ON CANADA L4J0A9 JENKINS, KOBY G LOURDES LOPEZ JENKINS 3595 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 FERNANDEZ, AUGUSTO 3585 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 CHAGNON REVOCABLE TRUST 3575 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 RINER, JAMES C 3565 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 GREEN, GIZELY 3543 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 VAZQUEZ, CHRISTIAN M AMANDA R VAZQUEZ 3533 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MORALES, FRANCISCO 3523 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ERCOLANI, JOSEPH P JOSEPH F ERCOLANI 6017 PINE RIDGE RD #70 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34119 DEL VALLE, NANCY VICTOR M AVILES 3485 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 GARCIA, OMAR & MARIAM 3473 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 RAMOS, BEATRIZ TATIANA BARRIOS 3459 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 WENDT, MATTHEW & MINDY L 3445 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 JAMES, JERRY L & PEGGY L 1627 PRIMROSE LN FAIRBORN OH UNITED STATES 45324 GARCIA, ROGELIO PO BOX 10673 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34101 MISAS, ALBA M 12862 SW 134TH ST MIAMI FL UNITED STATES 33186 RAMIREZ, YOANDRY E 3365 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MAZZOTTA, SEBASTAIN JENNIFER MAZZOTTA 7005 ROMANA WAY #1706 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34119 VO, LONG T & OANH H 3042 TALKING ROCK DR FAIRFAX VA UNITED STATES 22031 ALONSO, LUIS J 3740 NW 13TH ST MIAMI FL UNITED STATES 33126 PHAM, NHAN T BACH LIEU THI HUYNH 3285 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 AVDYLLARI, BARDHYL 2571 GOLDEN GATE BLVD E NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 M DOUYON DE AZEVEDO MEDICINE SOCIETE PROFESSIONNELLE 310 OLMSTEAD OTTAWA ON CANADA K1L 7K3 GARCIA, RENE & ASTRID 3250 CYPRESS GLEN WAY APT 405 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34109 MARTINEZ, JORGE M DAYRON J MARTINEZ 3225 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ESTATE MANAGEMENT INVEST INC 6017 PINE RIDGE RD P O BOX 241 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34119 GONZALEZ, PORFIRIO RICHARD GONZALEZ 2785 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 PALACIOS, PEDRO D & LUDY V 201 PORTER STREET NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34113 Page 1429 of 4908 GABELA, LUIS OMAR SYLVYA MILENA AYALA CAMILA NICOLE GABELA 7984 BRISTOL CIR NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 HERNANDEZ, ROLISBEL 1912 45TH ST SW NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34116 MUSE FAMILY TRUST 3736 ROBERT M GRISSOM PKWY #322 MYRTLE BEACH SC UNITED STATES 29577 SHAW, RACQUEL ALECIA OMARIO HUBERT SHAW 2923 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 GUSTAFSON, JENNIFER L 2915 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 SUAREZ, NELSON 2895 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ESTEVEZ, LAZARO Y EBANKS 2885 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 SANCHEZ, JESUS 2442 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 BATISTA, PETER & MIREYA 20504 SW 127TH PL MIAMI FL UNITED STATES 33177 CASTELLON, TERESA L PAOLA BARRIOS ARMANDO BARRIOS MENDEZ JR 4318 CICADO WAY LAS VEGAS NV UNITED STATES 89121 REYES, JENNEXIS C 2785 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 TAUNK, PUSHPAK SILPA THAIVALAPPIL TAUNK 3421 W. HORATIO ST #112 TAMPA FL UNITED STATES 33609 FLORES JR, FELIX & DAISY 18123 SW 87TH PL PALMETTO BAY FL UNITED STATES 33157 FLORES, FELIX & DAISY 18123 SW 87TH PL PALMETTO BAY FL UNITED STATES 33157 IGLESIAS, IVAN 2695 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 SOSA, ROSA JOSE OLIVIA VASQUEZ 2679 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 GRELA, HERMIS OSMIN GARCIA 2665 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 QUINONES, REYNALDO & LILIANA 2645 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MOSKAL, ERIK LOUIS SAMANTHA AMBER MOSKAL 2633 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 NOVOA, FABIANA ANDREINA MATTHEW CHRISTOPHER DUNHAM 2625 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 DE SOUSA, QUINTINO C 2605 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 DE SOUSA, QUINTINO 812 96TH AVE N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34108 HINLEY, PATRICIA LEE 2585 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 PINTO, JOSE E & CECILIA 2575 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 CARRILLO, MICHELLE 2561 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 VANDERPLOEG, DUSTIN D YESENIA PEREZ VANDERPLOEG 2545 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 GALVAN, ALFREDO 2535 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 WHITE, SILVIA 9 DIAS CREEK RD CAPE MAY COURTHO NJ UNITED STATES 08108 LARIOS, EDUARDO A GALINA YUDINOVA 2513 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 VITALE, SALVATORE LAUREN DEBORAH ERSNER 2485 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 CRESPO, YADIEL SUAREZ 2471 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 PRIETO, FELIX U & CHRISTINA A 2445 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 PRIETO, FELIX FELIX U PRIETO 2445 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 GUEDES, ERNESTO R CRISTINA A PASQUALI 2411 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 HOLT EST, BARBARA F % DENISE DAVENE LAPE 816 AMETHYST WAY VALRICO FL UNITED STATES 33594 CASTELLANO, YOANDY VAZQUEZ ROSA SANCHEZ GARCIA 2385 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MORGAN, JOSEPH M 2365 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 DIAZ, XIOMARA SOCARRAS 2846 EVERFGLADES BLVD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 GONZALEZ, RICHARD P MILADYS GONZALEZ 2775 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 CEKO, LOUIE & TANYA 2840 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 SALCEDO, FERNANDO & JOANN 10304 NW 7TH CT PLANTATION FL UNITED STATES 33324 COUNTRY HOME LLC PO BOX 2407 MARCO ISLAND FL UNITED STATES 34145 CARDENAS, JESUS A 3165 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 DROP, JACOB ALEXANDER KAROL VANESSA DROP 831 NW 84TH DR CORAL SPRINGS FL UNITED STATES 33071 GOLDEN DREAM INVESTORS LLC 2087 WEST 76TH ST HIALEAH FL UNITED STATES 33016 CITY OF NAPLES 735 8TH ST S NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34102 GATOR INVESTMENT OF SW FL INC 4184 6TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 QUESADA, ROLANDO 3835 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MENDEZ, MAIDE MICHAEL ANTHONY BEATTY 3826 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ALVAREZ, RAUL IGLESIAS MAILYN RODRIGUEZ LUQUE 3780 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 AMPARO, JUANA 3770 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 DIAZ, LUCY JESUS ESTRADA DANIEL GONZALEZ-LAUZAN 3929 SW 60TH AVE MIAMI FL UNITED STATES 33155 WOODWORTH, WESLEY J & IRENE A 3897 W MAPLE RD WIXOM MI UNITED STATES 48393 MORENO, CARLOS M 3740 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 BLANCO, ELIZABET PO BOX 990465 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34116 Page 1430 of 4908 FERMANIAN, STEPHEN & SHERRY 3438 BUSS DR COMMERCE TOWNSHI MI UNITED STATES 48390 STEVENSON JR, MICHAEL D AMBER R STEVENSON 6587 WEST ATLANTIC AVE HUDSON NY UNITED STATES 12534 AGRENOT, JOAQUIN & GARDENIA 30605 SW 152ND CT HOMESTEAD FL UNITED STATES 33033 FUENTES, ROBERTO & ANA 3680 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 FERNANDEZ, JULIO CESAR MARIAMNE GARCIA 3670 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 REID, LOUISE MARGOT & ANDREW 3660 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 GARCIA, PEDRO MA GUADALUPE GARCIA VILLAGOMEZ 3644 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MC CRILLIS EST, GEORGE R % CHANTELLE MILLER 26465 COUNTY RD 74 EATON CO UNITED STATES 80615 JANUARIS LLC 2053 FAIRMONT LN NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 DELGADO, BELINDA 3610 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 STEVENSON, DAVID J & PAULA A 3590 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 VAZQUEZ, IDOLIDIA LEIRA M TORRES 9071 SW 172TH AVE MIAMI FL UNITED STATES 33196 BALASA, ALEXANDRU OLGA I BALASA 3570 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 LARUSSO, GIOVANNI MAY-LING ENEDINA AGUILERA 3560 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 GREENE, GORDON LLOYD GEORGIA DEVOST BONNY SEKI 104 60 JANE ST BOLTON ON CANADA L7E 2T1 MARTINEZ, CARLOS 4679 EVERGLADES BLVD NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 GASTON, MICHAEL T & LAURA L 541 FISHER RD CABOT PA UNITED STATES 16023 LEINWEBER, ARNAUD W 3496 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ASTOLA, ALEN CALLE PONTE VEDRA #306 URBANIZACION LA ESTANCIA LAMOLINA-LIMA PERU ELLOTT, LINFORD & DOROTHY 3470 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 D GREENFIELD TRUST 3460 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ACOSTA, GEORGETTE DIAZ JASIEL SUAREZ 3440 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 FOIANINI, ANDRES 1345 CHARLESTON SQUARE DR #201 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34110 HERNANDEZ, E EZEQUIEL RIVERA ALEXANDREA E RIVERA 3426 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 VALDES, ROBERTO ERLIANIS RIVES MEDEROS 3420 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 RIVADENEIRA, FERNANDO 3390 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MICHEL, CHARLINE 3382 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 LOPEZ, MARIA D CASTILLO JORGE MATAMOROS BLANCO 3370 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 PHAM, DUC THANH & HOA THI 3360 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 TALADRO ENTERPRISE LLC 12555 ORANGE DRIVE #220 FORT LAUDERDALE FL UNITED STATES 33330 UNICASA DEVELOPMENT INC 12555 ORANGE DRIVE UNIT 220 FORT LAUDERDALE FL UNITED STATES 33330 AIMARO, JASON A & DANA L 3290 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 BESSE, RICHARD L & BRIDGET 144 ROYAL PALM DR STE 218 MARCO ISLAND FL UNITED STATES 34145 ELIAS, ZONSOLES FELIPE ALEJANDRO PICO HERNANDEZ 3274 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 GONGORA, ANTONIO ALEJANDRO ANGELICA M BRINEZ AGUILERA 3260 27TH AVE N E NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 PRESTIGE VISION DEVT LLC 2920 NW 56TH AVE APT B411 LAUDERHILL FL UNITED STATES 33313 CROUSHORE, TERRY A DIONAIKA M CROUSHORE 3230 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 CROUSHORE, TERRY A DIONAIKA CROUSHORE 3230 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 CROUSHORE, TERRY & DIONAIKA 3230 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 WILLIS, JUSTIN & KALLEY 2680 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 RAMIREZ, ALFREDO E TANIA LISET FLORES ALEJANDRO E RAMIREZ 2545 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 PEREZ, ANGEL & TANIA ROSA PEREZ 2980 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 PEREZ, ANGEL & TANIA 2970 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 RIVERA, IVAN R & ELIZABETH C PO BOX 139 SABANA SECA PR UNITED STATES 00952 M & P HOME CONSTRUCTION LLC 1681 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 FLEMING, LANCE & TAMI 3040 OIL WELL RD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MALAGA, JOSE L & PATRICIA L 2930 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 PEREZ, DAREINE 2920 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MOLINA, ALEJANDRO 2910 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 2896 27TH AVENUE NE LLC 2711 ORANGE GROVE TRAIL NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 GRASSO, JOSEPH MICHELLE GRASSO 2870 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 PERALTA, RAFAEL A & DIONISIA 2848 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ARMAS, ELBA 1980 KEANE AVE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34117 TRIMBLE, DONALD G 2830 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 GARCIA, ALBERTO JOSEFINA Y MARTIN 2820 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 Page 1431 of 4908 PEREZ, OMAR DIAS LUZ CASTRO 2780 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 HOLCOMB, JASON C & JOAN 2770 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 STRAUTS, KRISTAPS CATALINA MARIA STRAUTS 2764 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 COLOME, ENELIDO A INGRID COLOME 1875 SW 22ND TER MIAMI FL UNITED STATES 33145 FRANCOIS, EDDIE K ANIA THAMAR BREVIL FRANCOIS 2732 27TH AVENUE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MONZON, ABIGAIL MARIE LUIS GERARDO MONZON-MARTINEZ 2720 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 PEREZ, OSCAR OSMAYDY FERNANDEZ DANIELA PEREZ FERNANDEZ 2710 27TH AVE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ENSELL, RANDY 2690 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 LEZCANO, TERESA ANA MARIA LEZCANO MADELIN LEZCANO 3140 S OCEAN DR APT 1108 HALLANDALE BEACH FL UNITED STATES 33009 XIQUES, SYLVIA ENRIQUE XIQUES 6031 NW 201ST ST HIALEAH FL UNITED STATES 33015 CERRA, MARIA TERESA JUAN A LOPEZ 2644 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MARTINEZ, WILLIAM 2616 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MINAYA, AYMEE JAVIER O MILLAN 2590 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 FUENTES, ROBERTO C YEREMIS FURENTES 2570 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 GARCIA RIVERA, JOSE A ERIKA DEL VALLE 2562 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 SAUNDERS, HALEY & JAYSON 2540 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ROJAS, DAVID F ADRIANA ESTEVEZ 2530 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MCKEOWN SIMONSON, DENISE ROBERT SIMONSON 2514 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 CLIS HOLDING GROUP LLC ANGEL CABRERA 4870 GOLDEN GATE PKWY NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34116 PAPOLCZY, HEIDI E 2480 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 DEVISSE, VIRGINIA 2472 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 CHAVEZ, LAZARA ELIODORO CHAVEZ 2460 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 LLANES, LISET ALFONSO 2440 27TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 HAVI LLC 2098 COVE LN WESTON FL UNITED STATES 33326 RAPHAEL, MARIE M WILLY EDOUARD 288020TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 REGALADO, RAQUEL 9517 SW 138 PLACE #9517 MIAMI FL UNITED STATES 33186 TRAN, CHAU N & OANH T 909 S WESTHILL CT BLOOMINGTON IN UNITED STATES 47403 MAGDALENO, ADRIAN & MARIBEL 2631 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 RODRIGUEZ, PRAXEDIS 2640 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MERVEILLE, ELISABETH ISABEL MARTHA DESLOUCHES 2645 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ELIAS, DULCE NATALI IVAN ELIAS MARTINEZ 25808 COCKLESHELL DR #217 BONITA SPRINGS FL UNITED STATES 34135 MAGDALENO, ADRIAN & MARIBEL 2631 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 FUENTES, JULIA 2621 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ARMARIO-ALVAREZ, YUNEISI 3311 7TH AVE SW NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34117 LAZO, YAMIL 3811 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 SWANSON, BARBARA E MARK R SWANSON BRETT D SWANSON 2502 NW LAKE JEFFERY RD LAKE CITY FL UNITED STATES 32055 EVANS, NATHANAEL J FLORINA R PASKA EVANS 3767 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 TREVINO, MINERVA 3755 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ULLOA, NELSON MIREYSIS TORNA 3745 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ARREGUIN, FERMIN DAMIAN ARREGUIN 3735 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 AMAYA, LUIS MIRIAM PONCE 3725 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ORTIZ, YANDY 3715 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 HYLTON, KATHLEEN M 3695 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 EXECUTIVE CARPENTRY INC 2361 2ND AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 RODRIGUEZ JR, ANGEL M ANGEL RODRIGUEZ SR 3675 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 GIRALDO, CLAUDIA LUCIA JUAN DAVID MARULANDA GIRALDO 3665 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 RODRIGUEZ, ALEJANDRO GOYES 3645 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 KLEIN, DEVON CHARLES LEA NICOLE ELAINE KLEIN 3627 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 VARGAS, GERMAN ALBERTO JAILENE MARIE HERNANDEZ 181 22ND AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 RIOL, GIRLONG MILIAN 3615 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 PERDOMO, ALIER ROSANGELA COCCHELLA 7891 BRISTOL CR NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 GALARZA, MINERVA 3581 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 JOSE, PONCIANO VENTURA 2331 DELLA DR NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 HERNANDEZ, SEBASTIANA PO BOX 11346 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34101 CASTRO, GEORGE V 7211 MIRAMAR PKWY MIRAMAR FL UNITED STATES 33023 Page 1432 of 4908 ECHEVERRIA, ARIEL AGUILA MARGARITA RODRIGUEZ GONZALEZ 3515 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 PARSONS, DAILIS 3491 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 JACKSON, JONATHAN LEON JENNA LYNN JACKSON 3485 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 JAHASKE-KLESEN, PATRICIA 1611 CAMBERLEY CT UNIT 4 BARTLETT IL UNITED STATES 60103 OLIVERA, OSDEYMI YANIURKI MADRIGAL CASTRO 3451 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 SALDARRIAGA, DIANY 3445 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 SIFRE, CHARLES A GIOVANNA QUINTANA 3435 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MARTINEZ ACOSTA, ANGELICA KARLA LLANAS MARTINEZ 3421 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 FERNANDEZ, ERWIN LEYDISBEL JAIME ROBAINA 3397 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 BRIMMER, LOGAN JON EATON NICOLE BRIMMER 3385 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ROSADO, OMAR & VICTORIA N 3375 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 AYALA, PEDRO & ALMADELIA 3361 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 URIBE, PEDRO AYALA ALMADELIA AYALA 3361 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 AVILES, FLOR A MORALES DIOGENES ARRIETA 3335 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 FONTAINE, WILMA S 240 WAGON TRACE LN KERNERSVILLE NC UNITED STATES 27284 DIAZ, JULIO CESAR CARAVIA 1743 JUNG BLVD E NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 LAGO, PAUEL & YUGLIS 3293 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 LJBR LLC 12691 AAVIANO DR NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34105 CLARK, COURTNEY F LISSETTE GARCIA 3275 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 TINIZHANAY, LUIS A MARGARET MONENTE 22 KING EIDER WAY TAYLORS SC UNITED STATES 29687 ARGUEDAS, CLAUDIO R ORMENO 3245 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 PEREZ, YUNIEL 961 15TH ST SW NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34117 WANG, SAI YU 560 25TH ST S W NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34117 DONALDSON, WILLIAM & BARDINA 15060 92ND CT N WEST PALM BEACH FL UNITED STATES 33412 BILARDELLO, DANN J 2590 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY-SAINTS 50 E NORTH TEMPLE ST 22ND FLOOR SALT LAKE CITY UT UNITED STATES 84150 CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS 50 EAST NORTH TEMPLE 22ND FLR SALT LAKE CITY UT UNITED STATES 84101 DE RENDON, PATRICIA G PRIMO 3027 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 VAZQUEZ, JIOVANNI 2995 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 GALLEGOS, LLOLANDA & JOSE A 2985 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 KELLMAN, ELISE O WILCY O BRATHWAITE 2975 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 FERNANDEZ, MIRYAN 13841 HEANEY AVE ORLANDO FL UNITED STATES 32827 GARCIA, JUSTO N & ROSA M 2945 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 SCHUMACHER, HERMANN & ILZE BECKSTR 53 DARMSTADT GERMANY 64287 GUERRA, NOEL & NORMA 2895 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 DIAZ, MAVIS Y 2885 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 KURTH, AARON & ANJULEE 2865 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 REYES, TOMAS A & JUANA R 2845 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 SANCHEZ CAMARGO, YANDY 2829 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 BARBARA F JONES TRUST 3000 COUNTY BARN RD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34112 MARTINEZ, CARLOS 4679 EVERGLADES BLVD NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 SOTOLONGO, JAVIER 2765 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 TENDERO, JENNIFER MAYQUEL SALGADO 2735 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 LOPEZ, JUAN M & NYDIA 2715 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 CARTAYA, RAFAEL I 4280 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 VANNAVONG, POUIE & BOUALOM 2665 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 CARBALLO, ORLANDO 2635 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 CARBALLO, ORLANDO & GLADYS 2635 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 CARBALLO JR, ORLANDO & YENEISY 2625 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ALFONSO, IDALMIS 1925 N MONTICELLO AVE CHICAGO IL UNITED STATES 60647 GONZALEZ, RUBEN C & BELKYS C 2585 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 DINNEEN, SILVIA MARCOS SANTOS REYES 2383 BEAR CREEK DR #204 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34109 CHAVARRIA, LUIS J & MAGALY T 2549 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 CAMILLE, JEAN DIEUMES NATACHA CAMILLE CARIUS 2545 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 BALMACEDA, MARIA 550 SW 115TH AVE UNIT 904E MIAMI FL UNITED STATES 33174 Page 1433 of 4908 SCOTT, JOHN EDMUND KATHLEEN BENZ SCOTT 2525 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 VALDES, ARACELIS 2495 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 GAINZA, YOAS MATOS 2485 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ADRIEL CORP 1895 NE 198TH TER NORTH MIAMI BEAC FL UNITED STATES 33179 KLASS, RICHARD 8 STONEHENGE LN EAST NORTHPORT NY UNITED STATES 11731 VIOREL TOADER TRUST 6688 HUNTERS RD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34109 RADFORD, TRAVIS W & ROMINA 3726 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ALLEN, ANTON DYLAN NOREAL TINA MARIE ALLEN 3714 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 VIERA, DUNIESKY ALMANZA JANY A LUGO CORDOVE 3690 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 BROWN, MONICA K LESHAUNE L LAWRENCE 3682 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 GAYNAIR, PAULINE H 3674 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 SANCHEZ REVOCABLE TRUST 3660 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 GASTELU, MARIA LEONOR 13707 SW 66TH ST APT C-204 MIAMI FL UNITED STATES 33183 PATTERSON, BRIAN K & BRIANNE L 3630 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ELE PROPERTIES LLC 14020 SW 92ND AVE MIAMI FL UNITED STATES 33176 SOZA, MARITZA 3610 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 LALIBERTE JR, CHARLES A 3590 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 SENA. RAFAEL NERETTE DIANA J ARRECHEA ROJAS 3580 RANDALL BLVD E NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 BATHOLD, VIOLET 3572 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 CESAR, ADELINE NESTER CHARLES 3560 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 PARRA, A ALBERTO QUINTERO JOSELYN C SANCHEZ SANCHEZ 3548 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 TSCHUDY, RANDOLPH B PAULETTE K TSCHUDY 5007 STATE ROUTE 416 SE NEW PHILADELPHIA OH UNITED STATES 44663 FRANCOIS, CARLO & EDWIGE M 3516 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 SANTIAGO, ROSALBA LOPEZ 3490 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 PORTUGUEZ, LEONARDO MILDRED ENRIQUEZ RODRIGUEZ 3484 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 VADON ET AL, JO ANN VINCENT L CALABRESE % JOHN LEAVENS 2358 SHADE TREE LN CLEARWATER FL UNITED STATES 33759 GABOT, MANUEL JULISSA ACOSTA ANGEL GABOT 3466 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 SORIS, MARLEN BEJERANO 3450 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 SERRANO, OMAR & MELISSA 3440 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 PEREZ, CARLOS & MARIA A 3430 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 AVILES REVOCABLE TRUST 1232 CYPRESS WOODS DR NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34103 MARIA ROCIO MORA REV TRUST 1460 39TH ST SW NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34117 FRANCO, VIRGILIO PABLO JUAREZ 14747 COUNTY RD #858 IMMOKALEE FL UNITED STATES 34142 AURORA14 LLC 2155 KHASIA PT NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34110 QUINTERO, KARISSA 3362 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 BERTALAN, BERTA 5900 ARMSTRONG AVE #105 CSL QC CANADA H4W 2Z5 CANCINO, MAYKOL IBRAIN LOPEZ ANA M CANCINO SANCHEZ 3330 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 GARCIA, EHOLIA KATIUSKA 3320 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 LOPEZ, LAZARO JULIO IDARMIS GARCIA 3310 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 RIVERA, KRYSTINA J 3290 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 RIVERA, TOMAS 3290 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MCMILLION, ALICE J MARVIN CHARLES MCMILLION ARELYS MARIA MORTO 3270 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MARGARET I LOMANDO LIV TRUST 34617 HEAVENLY LN DADE CITY FL UNITED STATES 33525 AURORA 14 LLC 2155 KHASIA POINT NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34119 OLIVA, MAYLA 3230 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 HC & SONS LLC 25211 PINSON DR BONITA SPRINGS FL UNITED STATES 34135 ILOTZ LLC 2148 GROVE DR NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 VIOREL TOADER TRUST 6688 HUNTERS RD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34109 HORTA, ANDRES EDUARDINA HORTA MILAGROS AMARILIS IGLESIAS 445 NW 20TH AVE MIAMI FL UNITED STATES 33125 ALDANA, JORGE Y GUTIERREZ 3042 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 GARCIA, HECTOR ELISEO 3030 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MELLUL, LISA 3020 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 VILORIA, JUAN J & SONNIA 2990 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 SOTOMAYOR, JORGE A CHRISTINE SOTOMAYOR 2980 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ALTUHOV, BENJAMIN & MARIA 2970 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 Page 1434 of 4908 ROBLES JR, CHRISTINO & TATIANA 2940 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 THOMPSON, DOROTHY KISHIA 2920 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 BROOKER, ESMEE E 134 ACK LA E BRAMHALL CHESHIR ENGLAND SK7 2AB OLIVA, ENRIQUE 2890 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 KOOPMAN, GEORGE MICHAEL VICKI LYNN KOOPMAN 2880 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 HERNANDEZ, HUSSEIN 2872 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 RODRIGUEZ, ABRAHAM MELENDEZ MARISOL MELENDEZ MAYRA ROMERO MELENDEZ SENON ROMERO HERNANDEZ 2860 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 OFER, ABRAHAM JACOB CYNTHIA ANNE OFER 154 FARRINGTON AVE SLEEPY HOLLOW NY UNITED STATES 10591 MAGEE, JAMES & YAHAIRA 2830 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 LAURA L BOWLING REV TRUST 2820 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 NAFDOF PRIVATE SERIES I 2316 PINE RIDGE RD #453 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34109 MIRAMAR SOLUTION GROUP INC 2791 GOLDEN GATE BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MARCIAL, RICARDO SOLANGEL J MARCIAL 2740 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 L CONSTRUCTION LLC 3594 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 PEREZ, DIANE & AURELIO 2710 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 VANEK, MICHAEL A & JOY A 4514 S EMERALD AVE CHICAGO IL UNITED STATES 60609 COHEN, PATRICIA A JAMES C COHEN 2650 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 TOLEDO, ROBERTO & MADELIN 131 E 36TH ST HIALEAH FL UNITED STATES 33013 FORS, CARLOS 2951 SW 136 CT MIAMI FL UNITED STATES 33175 BERTEMATTI, ANDRES A & MARKIA 9721 SW 32ND ST MIAMI FL UNITED STATES 33165 MORAN, LAZARO ALBERTO ESSY ELIANET SANCHEZ DE LA TORRE, RAUL & BARBARA 2530 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 FRANCO, CESAR A 2420 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 CRUZ, JESUS S DIAZ ELGUIS CRESPO PEREZ 3581 24TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 PAGACH, MARK S 1615 S 58TH ST MILWAUKEE WI UNITED STATES 53214 THOMAS, GEORGE BABITHA KURIAKOSE 630 KYLEMORE DRIVE DES PLAINES IL UNITED STATES 60016 GONZALEZ, MAGALY DAMIAN GONZALEZ 3541 24TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 PEREZ, KIRSTEN NICOLE MANUEL PEREZ 3521 24TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 SOSA, MINERVA MARIA DAVID C QUINTERO 2223 SW 137TH PL MIAMI FL UNITED STATES 33175 COLINA, DENNIS 3495 24TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 RAMOS, JUAN A & BERDARDINA 1175 NW 79TH ST LOT B19 MIAMI FL UNITED STATES 33150 MIRELES, JESSICA ANGEL MARTINEZ 3473 24TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 SANTILLI, MARLENE 224 OWL CT FREMONT CA UNITED STATES 94539 SANCHEZ, JOHANA D & FELIPE L 3431 24TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 PINERA, ALIUSKA 3421 24TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 FERRER,INES OVIDIO FERRER 3411 24TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 JEAN-BAPTISTE, JOSUE MARTINE SAINT-FLEUR 3393 24TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 GELPI, RICARDO & YENY 3381 24TH AVE N E NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 BITTNER, PIERCE R 3371 24TH AVE N E NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 WALLACE, KENNETH 3361 24TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 JOSEPH, JEAN S & DIEULA 3341 24TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 DUNN FAMILY REV LIV TRUST 231 CASCO CT SE PALM BAY FL UNITED STATES 32909 EMILIA CASTRO TRUST 1121 14TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 FRANCOIS, JOHN GARY 4523 31ST AVE SW NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34116 WILLIAMS, YVONNE P 5546 113TH ST SEMINOLE FL UNITED STATES 33772 FUENTES, JULIA 2621 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 VAZQUEZ, LUDWIG J ALINA SANTANA HERNANDEZ 3271 24TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ORTIZ, JUAN M & TAMARA D 3261 24TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MORAGA, JOSE A CARMEN PEREIRA 3231 24TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MORAGA, JOSE A CARMEN PEREIRA 3231 24TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 FEBLES, YONNIE FUNDORA CARIDAD SIERRA LEYVA 3221 24TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 PEREZ, JORGE LUIS GONZALEZ DIANA WALESKA VARGAS 3211 24TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MIRELES SERVICES LLC 1121 11TH ST SW NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34117 PENKALA, FRANCES C/O CHERYL JANAKUS 18W521 S FRONTAGE RD LEMONT IL UNITED STATES 60439 PIRIZ, MONICA RODRIGUEZ 2991 24TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 PEREZ, ELIO 2981 24TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 Page 1435 of 4908 ESQUIJAROSA, ANGEL 2971 24TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 BEAUMONT, PAUL G & CLEOFINA M 2961 24TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 TOBY USA LLC 1445 LUDINTON AVE WESLEY CHAPEL FL UNITED STATES 33543 RODRIGUEZ TORREZ, BRENDA L 1310 NW 131ST ST NORTH MIAMI FL UNITED STATES 33167 GONZALEZ, HENIE & RAFAEL 2481 22ND AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 LUBARS, MICHELLE M 2911 24TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 HARPER, ALFREDO C & FRANCES F 2881 24TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 OLCEAN, IOAN MARIUS MARIA CLAUDIA PRADA 4430 FOREST HILLS BLVD PARMA OH UNITED STATES 44134 GONZALEZ, BLANCA E 2865 24TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ANDERSON, JOAN STEPHEN ANDERSON PO BOX 44 GRAND CAYMAN CAYMAN ISLANDS KY1-1601 MURRAY, RICHARD & MARIA I 2841 24TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 HOVLAND, JODY LYNN 2831 24TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 HUGHES, LISSA 2821 24TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ALVARADO JR, ALPHONSO 2781 24TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ARRIETA, FRANCISCO ALVARADO ANA ACUNA 90 25TH AVE NW NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34102 PALUMBO, LOUISE 148 RAFF AVE MINEOLA NY UNITED STATES 11501 HIDALGO, FRANCISCO J FIORELLA S CIEZA DE LEON PO BOX 960461 MIAMI FL UNITED STATES 33296 PENDER, FAYE YOUNG 2145 WOODBERRY RUN DR SNELLVILLE GA UNITED STATES 30078 CIFMORE, LEE 2721 24TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 BALON, DANIEL RODRIGUEZ MARILYN CRUZ VALIDO 2482 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 YECK TRUST 315 JACKSON ST PARIS TN UNITED STATES 38242 GUISAO-SENQUIZ, CARMEN G EFREN AROCHO RIVERA 2471 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 SERPA, JEANNE & LAUREOLO A 2460 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 DONATE, PEDRO P MEJIAS YARELY URRUTIA MACHIN 241 BENSON ST NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34113 OCHOA, JOSE ANTONIO MEJIA REBECA VAZQUEZ ZEPEDA 2436 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MARY RADOS REVOCABLE TRUST 555 18TH AVE S NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34102 BARRALAGA, L FERNANDO SALAZAR ESLY MAGALI MORAN 3115 24TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 UNICASA DEVELOPMENT INC 12555 ORANGE DRIVE UNIT 220 FORT LAUDERDALE FL UNITED STATES 33330 EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH OF NAPLES INC 777 MOORING LINE DR NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34102 EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH OF NAPLES INC 777 MOORING LINE DR NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34102 EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH OF NAPLES INC 777 MOORING LINE DR NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34102 EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH OF NAPLES INC 777 MOORING LINE DR NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34102 MERVEILLE, RONALD MARIE YVES R C MERVEILLE 3950 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 FONTAINE, WILMA S 240 WAGON TRACE LN KERNERSVILLE NC UNITED STATES 27284 UNICASA DEVELOPMENT INC 12555 ORANGE DRIVE UNIT 220 FORT LAUDERDALE FL UNITED STATES 33330 SANTOS, CHRISTOPHER A MONICA FABIOLA RIVERA 2670 OIL WELL RD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH 777 MOORING LINE DR NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34102 ALEMAN, DABEIBA ROBERTO SANCHEZ 19471 NW 7TH ST PEMBROKE PINES FL UNITED STATES 33029 R F BERMAN REV TRUST OF 2012 611 1ST SW NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34117 SOUTHWEST PERMACULTURE LLC 2921 SHERMAN AVENUE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 QUENALLATA, LUIS FERNANDO ANA OROZCO 14634 SW 132ND AVE MIAMI FL UNITED STATES 33186 RODRIGUEZ, ARIAN ANA C JUSTINIANO 2323 31ST AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 CARDOSA, MARCIO A MARICELA CARDOSO 2541 PICKARD LN NORTH PORT FL UNITED STATES 34286 ALVAREZ, JUAN ALBERTO JUAN CARLOS ALVAREZ 1555 W 44TH PL #343 HIALEAH FL UNITED STATES 33012 ALVAREZ, JUAN ALBERTO JUAN CARLOS ALVAREZ 1555 W 44TH PL #343 HIALEAH FL UNITED STATES 33012 BCSA PROPERTIES LLC 5920 ENGLISH OAKS LN NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34119 CACHO, DANILO C 2485 OIL WELL RD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 VEGA EST, PABLO C 2325 OIL WELL RD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 RENDA, MICHAEL & MARIA 11 PEARL ST WHITE HSE STA NJ UNITED STATES 08889 FERRER, MARLENE SANDRA LATA 10001 NW 135TH ST HIALEAH FL UNITED STATES 33018 UPLAND CAPITAL GROUP LLC 587 DRAYTON RD WINTER HAVEN FL UNITED STATES 33884 CAPITAL HOMES INVEST & ALL LLC ARM S A LLC 3211 10TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 TIMOTHY M TALBOTT JR REV TRUST 2626 OIL WELL RD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 PARMAR, KIRPAL S & SARBJEST 3660 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 SWFL ROMAJI LLC 4951 TAMIAMI TRAIL N STE 103 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34103 Page 1436 of 4908 DUPREE, R TERRY 108 CROSS CREEK BLVD PO BOX 238 TAMPA FL UNITED STATES 33647 LINK, CHRISTOPHER & KATHERINE 10209 SOUTH GOLDEN ELM DR ESTERO FL UNITED STATES 33928 LOZANO, JAIME ANDRES 1165 EVERGLADES BLVD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 PEREZ, HENRY 2042 MANDARIN LN NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 BT INVESTMENTS 01 LLC 2400 OIL WELL RD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 HINES, GARFIELD EDELL HINES 4665 8TH ST NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 XRS INVESTMENTS LLC 3961 SW 145 AVE MIRAMAR FL UNITED STATES 33027 SMITH, JOHN R KRISTEL RABORN 2775 OIL WELL RD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 DE MOMBLACK, KELY DURAN 5337 BRIN WAY AVE MARIA FL UNITED STATES 34142 LEANDRE, WESLY & CARLINE 3585 2ND AVE SE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34117 FORTES, HUGO LAZARO JESSIE FORTES 14752 SW 169TH LN MIAMI FL UNITED STATES 33187 MENENDEZ, PEDRO ISRAEL FERNANDEZ 7005 SW 21ST ST MIAMI FL UNITED STATES 33155 NAPLES OIL WELL LLC 555 NE 15TH ST APT 33A MIAMI FL UNITED STATES 33134 EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH OF NAPLES INC 777 MOORING LINE DR NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34102 MADHU, DAISY % O'CONNOR LAW FIRM 2240 BELLEAIR RD STE 115 CLEARWATER FL UNITED STATES 33764 JOLLY, CANDICE M NEIL P ELLIOTT 2560 OIL WELL RD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 MARRERO, LEONARDO & LIDIA 3045 OIL WELL RD NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 DEVRIES, TIMOTHY G & HELEN J 3591 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 BOROW, ORQUIDEA 3885 29TH AVE NE NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 ANDRACA, WILLIAM & YENEY 3944 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 AL WAALI LLC 100 LAKEVIEW DR #109 WESTON FL UNITED STATES 33326 DALBY FAMILY TRUST 9319 FIELDSTONE LN NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34120 VARGAS, DIEGO A CORREDOR MARIA I ARIZA SERRANO 4222 SIDERNO CT NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34119 NEAL COMMUNITIES OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA LLC 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD SARASOTA FL UNITED STATES 34240 NEAL COMMUNITIES OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA LLC 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD SARASOTA FL UNITED STATES 34240 NEAL COMMUNITIES OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA LLC 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD SARASOTA FL UNITED STATES 34240 NEAL COMMUNITIES OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA LLC 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD SARASOTA FL UNITED STATES 34240 NEAL COMMUNITIES OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA LLC 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD SARASOTA FL UNITED STATES 34240 NEAL COMMUNITIES OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA LLC 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD SARASOTA FL UNITED STATES 34240 NEAL COMMUNITIES OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA LLC 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD SARASOTA FL UNITED STATES 34240 NEAL COMMUNITIES OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA LLC 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD SARASOTA FL UNITED STATES 34240 NEAL COMMUNITIES OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA LLC 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD SARASOTA FL UNITED STATES 34240 NEAL COMMUNITIES OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA LLC 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD SARASOTA FL UNITED STATES 34240 NEAL COMMUNITIES OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA LLC 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD SARASOTA FL UNITED STATES 34240 NEAL COMMUNITIES OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA LLC 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD SARASOTA FL UNITED STATES 34240 NEAL COMMUNITIES OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA LLC 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD SARASOTA FL UNITED STATES 34240 NEAL COMMUNITIES OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA LLC 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD SARASOTA FL UNITED STATES 34240 NEAL COMMUNITIES OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA LLC 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD SARASOTA FL UNITED STATES 34240 NEAL COMMUNITIES OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA LLC 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD SARASOTA FL UNITED STATES 34240 NEAL COMMUNITIES OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA LLC 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD SARASOTA FL UNITED STATES 34240 NEAL COMMUNITIES OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA LLC 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD SARASOTA FL UNITED STATES 34240 NEAL COMMUNITIES OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA LLC 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD SARASOTA FL UNITED STATES 34240 NEAL COMMUNITIES OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA LLC 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD SARASOTA FL UNITED STATES 34240 NEAL COMMUNITIES OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA LLC 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD SARASOTA FL UNITED STATES 34240 NEAL COMMUNITIES OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA LLC 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD SARASOTA FL UNITED STATES 34240 NEAL COMMUNITIES OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA LLC 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD SARASOTA FL UNITED STATES 34240 NEAL COMMUNITIES OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA LLC 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD SARASOTA FL UNITED STATES 34240 NEAL COMMUNITIES OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA LLC 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD SARASOTA FL UNITED STATES 34240 NEAL COMMUNITIES OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA LLC 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD SARASOTA FL UNITED STATES 34240 NEAL COMMUNITIES OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA LLC 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD SARASOTA FL UNITED STATES 34240 NEAL COMMUNITIES OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA LLC 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD SARASOTA FL UNITED STATES 34240 NEAL COMMUNITIES OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA LLC 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD SARASOTA FL UNITED STATES 34240 NEAL COMMUNITIES OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA LLC 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD SARASOTA FL UNITED STATES 34240 NEAL COMMUNITIES OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA LLC 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD SARASOTA FL UNITED STATES 34240 NEAL COMMUNITIES OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA LLC 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD SARASOTA FL UNITED STATES 34240 Page 1437 of 4908 NEAL COMMUNITIES OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA LLC 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD SARASOTA FL UNITED STATES 34240 NEAL COMMUNITIES OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA LLC 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD SARASOTA FL UNITED STATES 34240 NEAL COMMUNITIES OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA LLC 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD SARASOTA FL UNITED STATES 34240 NEAL COMMUNITIES OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA LLC 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD SARASOTA FL UNITED STATES 34240 NEAL COMMUNITIES OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA LLC 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD SARASOTA FL UNITED STATES 34240 NEAL COMMUNITIES OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA LLC 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD SARASOTA FL UNITED STATES 34240 COLLIER CNTY 3299 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST OFFICES OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY STE 800 NAPLES FL UNITED STATES 34112 NEAL COMMUNITIES OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA LLC 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD SARASOTA FL UNITED STATES 34240 MADHU, DAISY % O'CONNOR LAW FIRM 2240 BELLEAIR RD STE 115 CLEARWATER FL UNITED STATES 33764 Golden Estates Area Civic Association 2631 4TH ST NW NAPLES FL 34120 Page 1438 of 4908 S 332. Mobile services,47 USCA S 332 United States Code Annotated Title 47. Telecommunications (Refs & Annos) Chapter 5. Wire or Radio Communication (Refs & Annos) Subchapter III. Special Provisions Relating to Radio (Refs & Annos) Part L General Prorisions Keycite Yellow lilaS - Negalive Treament islation 4Z U.S.CA. $ 332 $ 332. Mobile services Effective: March 23, zorS (a) Factors rvhich Commission must consider (c) Regulator]' treatment of nlobile services (l) Common carrier lreatmeDt of commercial mobile sen'ices (7) Preserr'ation of local zoning authority (A) General authorit]' (B) Limitations (i) The regulation ofthe placement, constmction, and modification ofpersonal wireless service facilities by any State or Except as provided in this paragaph, nothing in this chapter shall limit or affect the authority ofa State or local government or instrumentality thereof ovei dicisions regarding the placement, construction, and modification of personal wireless service facilities. wEsTLAwO2o2lThomsonReuters.NoclaimtooriginalU'SGovernmentWorks Page 1439 of 4908 S 332. Mobile services, 47 USCA S 332 local govemment or instrum€ntalirj* thereof- (I) shall not unreasonably discriminate amons Providers of functionally equivalent services; and (Il) shall not prohibit or have the effect ofprohibiting the provision of personal wireless services. (ii) A State or local government or instrumentality thereofshall act on any request for authorization to place, construct, or modifo personal wireless service facilities rvithin a reasonable period of time after the request is duly filed with such govemment or instumentality, taking into account the nature and scope ofsuch request. (iii) Any decision by a State or local government or insEumentalir)- thereofto deny a request to place, construct, or modiry personal rvireless service facilities shall be in uriting and supported by substantial evidence contained in a written record. (ir') No State or local govemment or instrumentality thereof may regulate the placement, construction, and modification ofpersonal wireless service facilities on the basis ofthe environmental effects of radio frequency emissions to the extent that such facilities comply with the Commission's regulations conceming such emissions. (v) Any person adversely affected by any final action or failwe to act by a State or local govemment or any instrumentality thereof that is inconsistent with this subparagraph may, within 30 days after such action or failure to act, commence an action in any court of competent jurisdiction. The court shall hear and decide such action on an expedited basis. Any person adversely affected by an act or failure to act by a State or local government or any instrumentality thereof that is inconsistent \yith clause (iv) may petition the Commission for relief. (C) Definitions For purposes of this paragraph- (i) the term "personal wireless services" means commercial mobile services, unlicensed wireless services, and common carrier wireless exchange access services: (iii) the term "unlicensed rvireless service" means the oflering of telecommunications services using duly aurhorized devices which do not require individual licenses, but does nol mean the provision of direct-to-home sateilite services (as dehned in section 303(v) ofthis title). WESTLAW O 2021 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works 2 (ii) the term "personal rvireless service facilities" means facilities for the provision ofpersonal wireless services; and Page 1440 of 4908 S 332. Mobile services,47 USCA S 332 47 U.S.C.A. $ 332, 47 USCA $ 332 Cunent through P.L. I l6-259. Some statute sections may be more curren t, see credits for details End ofl)ocumrnt @ 2021 Thomson Reuters No claim to origiral U.S. Govemment Work WESTLAW O 2021 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works 3 Page 1441 of 4908 Page 1442 of 4908 Page 1443 of 4908 Page 1444 of 4908 Page 1445 of 4908 Page 1446 of 4908 Page 1447 of 4908 Page 1448 of 4908 Page 1449 of 4908 Page 1450 of 4908 Page 1451 of 4908 Page 1452 of 4908 Page 1453 of 4908 Page 1454 of 4908 Page 1455 of 4908 Page 1456 of 4908 Page 1457 of 4908 Page 1458 of 4908 Page 1459 of 4908 Page 1460 of 4908 Page 1461 of 4908 Page 1462 of 4908 Page 1463 of 4908 Page 1464 of 4908 Page 1465 of 4908 Page 1466 of 4908 Page 1467 of 4908 Page 1468 of 4908 Page 1469 of 4908 Page 1470 of 4908 Page 1471 of 4908 Page 1472 of 4908 Page 1473 of 4908 Page 1474 of 4908 Page 1475 of 4908 Page 1476 of 4908 Page 1477 of 4908 Page 1478 of 4908 Page 1479 of 4908 Page 1480 of 4908 Page 1481 of 4908 Page 1482 of 4908 Page 1483 of 4908 Page 1484 of 4908 Page 1485 of 4908 Page 1486 of 4908 Page 1487 of 4908 Page 1488 of 4908 Page 1489 of 4908 Page 1490 of 4908 Page 1491 of 4908 Page 1492 of 4908 Page 1493 of 4908 Page 1494 of 4908 Page 1495 of 4908 Page 1496 of 4908 Page 1497 of 4908 Page 1498 of 4908 Page 1499 of 4908 Page 1500 of 4908 Page 1501 of 4908 Page 1502 of 4908 Page 1503 of 4908 Page 1504 of 4908 Page 1505 of 4908 Page 1506 of 4908 Page 1507 of 4908 Page 1508 of 4908 Page 1509 of 4908 Page 1510 of 4908 Page 1511 of 4908 Page 1512 of 4908 Page 1513 of 4908 Page 1514 of 4908 Page 1515 of 4908 Page 1516 of 4908 Page 1517 of 4908 Page 1518 of 4908 Page 1519 of 4908 Page 1520 of 4908 Page 1521 of 4908 Page 1522 of 4908 Page 1523 of 4908 Page 1524 of 4908 Page 1525 of 4908 Page 1526 of 4908 Page 1527 of 4908 Page 1528 of 4908 Page 1529 of 4908 Page 1530 of 4908 Page 1531 of 4908 Page 1532 of 4908 Page 1533 of 4908 Page 1534 of 4908 Page 1535 of 4908 Page 1536 of 4908 Page 1537 of 4908 Page 1538 of 4908 Page 1539 of 4908 Page 1540 of 4908 Page 1541 of 4908 Page 1542 of 4908 Page 1543 of 4908 Page 1544 of 4908 Page 1545 of 4908 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) at 9:00 A.M. on September 24, 2024, in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room, Third Floor, Collier Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Naples FL to consider: A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CONDITIONAL USE TO ALLOW A WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY ON LANDS ZONED ESTATES (E) WITHIN THE RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SUB-ELEMENT OF THE GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN ELEMENT OF THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN PURSUANT TO SECTION 2.03.01.B.1.c.12 AND SECTIONS 5.05.09.E.1 AND 5.05.09.H OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE ON .39± ACRES OF A 5.15+/- ACRE TRACT LOCATED AT 3147 31ST AVENUE NE (PARCEL 40171120002), AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF NE 31ST AVENUE AND EVERGLADES BOULEVARD NORTH, IN SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. [PL20220003008] (See Map Below) A copy of the proposed Resolution is on file with the Clerk to the Board and is available for inspection. All interested parties are invited to attend and be heard. All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County Manager prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to three (3) minutes on any item. The selection of any individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted ten (10) minutes to speak on an item. Written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. All materials used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. As part of an ongoing initiative to encourage public involvement, the public will have the opportunity to provide public comments remotely, as well as in person, during this proceeding. Individuals who would like to participate remotely should register through the link provided within the specific event/meeting entry on the Calendar of Events on the County website at www.colliercountyfl.gov/our-county/visitors/calendar-of-events after the agenda is posted on the County website. Registration should be done in advance of the public meeting, or any deadline specified within the public meeting notice. Individuals who register will receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how they can participate remotely in this meeting. Remote participation is provided as a courtesy and is at the user’s risk. The County is not responsible for technical issues. For additional information about the meeting, please call Geoffrey Willig at 252-8369 or email to Geoffrey.Willig@colliercountyfl.gov. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two (2) days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. Page 1546 of 4908 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA CHRIS HALL, CHAIRMAN CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK By: Yani Fernandez, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) Page 1547 of 4908 29thAVENE31stAVENEOil Well RDEverglades BLVD N33rdAVENEOil Well RD31stAVENE29thAVENE!IProjectLocationPage 1548 of 4908 Page 1549 of 4908 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCES Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) at 9:00 A.M. on September 24, 2024, in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room, Third Floor, Collier Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Naples FL to consider: AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AMENDING ORDINANCE 89-05, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT AND MAP SERIES BY CHANGING THE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF PROPERTY FROM URBAN, MIXED USE DISTRICT, URBAN RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT TO MATTSON AT VANDERBILT RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT, TO ALLOW A MAXIMUM DENSITY OF 150 MULTIFAMILY RENTAL UNITS WITH AFFORDABLE HOUSING, AND FURTHERMORE DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE ADOPTED AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 828 FEET FROM THE INTERSECTION OF VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD AND LIVINGSTON ROAD, IN SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 5.88± ACRES. [PL20220001010] AND AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM A RURAL AGRICULTURAL (A) ZONING DISTRICT TO A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) ZONING DISTRICT FOR THE PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS MATTSON AT VANDERBILT RPUD, TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF UP TO 150 MULTI-FAMILY RENTAL UNITS WITH AFFORDABLE HOUSING ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 828 FEET FROM THE INTERSECTION OF VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD AND LIVINGSTON ROAD, IN SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, CONSISTING OF 5.88± ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PL20220001011] (See Map Below) A copy of the proposed Ordinances is on file with the Clerk to the Board and is available for inspection. All interested parties are invited to attend and be heard. Page 1550 of 4908 All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County Manager prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to three (3) minutes on any item. The selection of any individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted ten (10) minutes to speak on an item. Written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. All materials used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. As part of an ongoing initiative to encourage public involvement, the public will have the opportunity to provide public comments remotely, as well as in person, during this proceeding. Individuals who would like to participate remotely should register through the link provided within the specific event/meeting entry on the Calendar of Events on the County website at www.colliercountyfl.gov/our-county/visitors/calendar-of-events after the agenda is posted on the County website. Registration should be done in advance of the public meeting, or any deadline specified within the public meeting notice. Individuals who register will receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how they can participate remotely in this meeting. Remote participation is provided as a courtesy and is at the user’s risk. The County is not responsible for technical issues. For additional information about the meeting, please call Geoffrey Willig at 252-8369 or email to Geoffrey.Willig@colliercountyfl.gov. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two (2) days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA CHRIS HALL, CHAIRMAN CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK By: Yani Fernandez, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) Page 1551 of 4908 Livingston RDVanderbiltBeachRDI-7 5 NI-7 5 S Livingston RD GrovesRDVillageWalk CIRMontalvoCTVenturaCTSanCarloCTSanPabloCTDonosoCTBeniciaCTCerritoCTM a rs a la W A Y !IProjectLocationPage 1552 of 4908 Page 1553 of 4908 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCES Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) at 9:00 A.M. on September 24, 2024, in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room, Third Floor, Collier Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Naples FL to consider: AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AMENDING ORDINANCE 89-05, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT AND MAP SERIES BY CHANGING THE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF PROPERTY FROM URBAN, MIXED USE DISTRICT, URBAN RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT TO MATTSON AT VANDERBILT RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT, TO ALLOW A MAXIMUM DENSITY OF 150 MULTIFAMILY RENTAL UNITS WITH AFFORDABLE HOUSING, AND FURTHERMORE DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE ADOPTED AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 828 FEET FROM THE INTERSECTION OF VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD AND LIVINGSTON ROAD, IN SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 5.88± ACRES. [PL20220001010] AND AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM A RURAL AGRICULTURAL (A) ZONING DISTRICT TO A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) ZONING DISTRICT FOR THE PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS MATTSON AT VANDERBILT RPUD, TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF UP TO 150 MULTI-FAMILY RENTAL UNITS WITH AFFORDABLE HOUSING ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 828 FEET FROM THE INTERSECTION OF VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD AND LIVINGSTON ROAD, IN SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, CONSISTING OF 5.88± ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PL20220001011] (See Map Below) A copy of the proposed Ordinances is on file with the Clerk to the Board and is available for inspection. All interested parties are invited to attend and be heard. Page 1554 of 4908 All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County Manager prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to three (3) minutes on any item. The selection of any individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted ten (10) minutes to speak on an item. Written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. All materials used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. As part of an ongoing initiative to encourage public involvement, the public will have the opportunity to provide public comments remotely, as well as in person, during this proceeding. Individuals who would like to participate remotely should register through the link provided within the specific event/meeting entry on the Calendar of Events on the County website at www.colliercountyfl.gov/our-county/visitors/calendar-of-events after the agenda is posted on the County website. Registration should be done in advance of the public meeting, or any deadline specified within the public meeting notice. Individuals who register will receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how they can participate remotely in this meeting. Remote participation is provided as a courtesy and is at the user’s risk. The County is not responsible for technical issues. For additional information about the meeting, please call Geoffrey Willig at 252-8369 or email to Geoffrey.Willig@colliercountyfl.gov. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two (2) days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA CHRIS HALL, CHAIRMAN CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK By: Yani Fernandez, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) Page 1555 of 4908 Livingston RDVanderbiltBeachRDI-7 5 NI-7 5 S Livingston RD GrovesRDVillageWalk CIRMontalvoCTVenturaCTSanCarloCTSanPabloCTDonosoCTBeniciaCTCerritoCTM a rs a la W A Y !IProjectLocationPage 1556 of 4908 Page 1557 of 4908