The URL can be used to link to this page

CCLAAC Backup 07/03/2024Conservation Collier Cycle 10, 11, 12, and 2024 Property Status Updated June 26, 28.A.d SUMMARY PAGE ACQUISITION SUMMARY OF ALL CYCLE 10, 11A, 11B, and 12A PROPERTIES Appraised or Purchase Price Total number of Total Acres Estimate or Estimated Value* Value* properties ACQUIRED PROPERTIES 615.60 $14,210,295 $13,833,625 73 (CYCLE 10, 11A, 11B, and 12A) PROPERTIES PENDING ACQUISITION* (CYCLE 11B, 12A, 12B, and 2024) 2,472.30 $31,428,590 $31,389,654 41 *Estimated Value used in calculations until Purchase Agreement is signed by Seller and scheduled for Collier County Board of County Commissioners meeting Packet Pg. 409 Conservation Collier Cycle 10, 11, 12, and 2024 Property Status Update 28.A.d CYCLE 10 AAL APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ON JANUARY 25, 2022 CYCLE 10 ACQUIRED PROPERTIES Property Name Preserve Size (ac) Appraised Value Closing Amount Acquisition Status Aguilar, Jorge Panther Walk 1.14 $40,000 $40,000 Closed 2/13/23 Preserve Arias, Eladio Dr. Robert H. Gore 3.16 $63,000 $52,900 Closed 9/22/23 III Preserve Arias, Eladio Dr. Robert H. Gore 3.78 $66,000 $63,200 Closed 9/22/23 III Preserve Arnay, Henrietta Panther Walk 1.14 $30,000 $30,000 Closed 6/16/23 Preserve Bailey, Charles E Dr. Robert H. Gore 1.14 $25,000 $25,000 Closed 9/20/23 III Preserve Behnke, Lois Panther Walk 1.14 $57,000 $57,000 Closed 6/16/23 Preserve Blocker, Brian Pepper Ranch 24.50 $220,000 $220,000 Closed 7/7/23 Preserve Burns, Sandra Panther Walk 1.14 $30,000 $30,000 Closed 1/30/23 Preserve Caberera, Mercedes Red Maple Swamp 9.16 $114,500 $114,500 Closed 3/21/22 Preserve Castillo, Jose Red Maple Swamp 5.41 $89,300 $84,835 Closed 7/14/23 Preserve Charles, Paulette Dr. Robert H. Gore 1.14 $25,100 $22,500 Closed 6/30/23 III Preserve Craparo, Stephen Dr. Robert H. Gore 1.64 $44,000 $39,600 Closed 9/15/23 III Preserve D & 1 Investors Panther Walk 1.14 $40,000 $40,000 Closed 6/9/23 Preserve Dessing, Carol A. Winchester Head 1.14 $18,810 $18,810 Closed 3/28/22 Preserve Fesser, Ivan Winchester Head 2.27 $56,800 $53,960 Closed 9/1/23 Preserve Fleming, Albert Dr. Robert H. Gore 1.64 $39,000 $37,500 Closed 9/15/23 III Preserve Gonzalez, Isabel Panther Walk 1.14 $50,000 $50,000 Closed 6/16/22 Preserve Gorman, Herman and Alice Winchester Head 1.14 $18,810 $18,810 Closed 9/26/22 Preserve Grossman, Barry Panther Walk 2.73 $63,000 $63,000 Closed 6/16/23 Preserve Guerra, Sigrid Red Maple Swamp 1.14 $20,500 $20,500 Closed 7/7/23 Preserve Hackmann, Charles Panther Walk 2.73 $70,000 $63,000 Closed 12/15/23 Preserve Hofmann, Adelaida Dr. Robert H. Gore 1.59 $36,000 $36,000 Closed 2/27/23 III Preserve Hussey Trust North Belle Meade 256.00 $2,072,500 $2,072,500 Closed 11/14/22 Preserve Johnson, Tim R Panther Walk 1.14 $30,000 $30,000 Closed 1/30/23 Preserve Joyce, David Panther Walk 2.27 $52,000 $52,000 Closed 6/9/23 Preserve Joyce, Martin and Elizabeth Panther Walk 2.27 $61,300 $55,170 Closed 8/17/23 Preserve Martinez, Abel Chavez Red Maple Swamp 2.27 $40,900 $36,000 Closed 8/17/23 Preserve Packet Pg. 410 Conservation Collier Cycle 10, 11, 12, and 2024 Property Status Update 28.A.d CYCLE 10 AAL APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ON JANUARY 25, 2022 CYCLE 10 ACQUIRED PROPERTIES, cont'd Property Name Preserve Size (ac) Appraised Value Closing Amount Acquisition Status McLaughlin Trust, Geraldine Red Maple Swamp 4.61 $57,625 $57,625 Closed 3/21/22 Preserve Meyer Trust Panther Walk 1.59 $72,000 $72,000 Closed 1/30/23 Preserve Moody Crawford, Jim H Pepper Ranch 59.79 $505,000 $505,000 Closed 9/22/23 Preserve Pena, John Panther Walk 2.27 $52,000 $52,000 Closed 2/13/23 Preserve Popp, Joe Rivers Road 19.40 $630,000 $630,000 Closed 9/26/22 Preserve Quevedo, Odalys Dr. Robert H. Gore 1.14 $28,000 $26,600 Closed 7/14/23 III Preserve Rodriguez (f.k.a. Lopez), Terri Panther Walk 1.59 $42,900 $38,610 Closed 8/17/23 Preserve Ruben Trust Winchester Head 1.59 $39,800 $39,800 Closed 7/7/23 Preserve Rudnick, Carol -Donation Dr. Robert H. Gore 1.59 N/A N/A Closed 6/30/22 III Preserve Salgado, Julio Panther Walk 2.73 $73,700 $70,110 Closed 8/17/23 Preserve Sanchez, PS & NE Panther Walk 2.73 $63,000 $63,000 Closed 1/30/23 Preserve Selvig, Maribeth - Donation Panther Walk 1.14 N/A N/A Closed 9/26/22 Preserve Setser, Carrie, Larry, and Ruby Red Maple Swamp 5.00 $62,500 $62,500 Closed 3/21/22 Preserve Sparkman Tamara Gibson Panther Walk 1.14 $33,000 $33,000 Closed 7/14/23 Preserve Thommen, William F Panther Walk 5.00 $100,000 $100,000 Closed 1/30/23 Preserve Toro, Michael Winchester Head 1.59 $39,800 $35,820 Closed 6/30/23 Preserve Trofatter, Frederick Winchester Head 1.14 $28,000 $25,650 Closed 9/7/23 Preserve Varney, Gail Red Maple Swamp 1.14 $14,250 $14,250 Closed 2/14/22 Preserve Wright, David Panther Walk 1.14 $30,000 $30,000 Closed 1/30/23 Preserve Zani, Paul Dr. Robert H. Gore 2.27 $49,900 $49,900 Closed 7/7/23 III Preserve Zhuang, Joseph Panther Walk 2.73 $63,000 $63,000 Closed 1/30/23 Preserve TOTAL CYCLE 10 ACQUIRED PROPERTIES 456.42 $5,457,995 $5,395,650 Total number of properties = 48 Packet Pg. 411 Conservation Collier Cycle 10, 11, 12, and 2024 Property Status Update 28.A.d CYCLE 10 AAL APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ON JANUARY 25, 2022 CYCLE 10 A -LIST PROPERTIES THAT WILL NOT BE ACQUIRED AT THIS TIME Property Name Preserve Size (ac) Appraised Value Final Offer Amount Acquisition Status Amaranth Trust, Forrest G N/A 71.16 N/A N/A Property withdrawn Anderson, Charles Panther Walk 2.27 $64,000 $64,000 Offer not accepted Preserve Anderson, Charles Panther Walk 1.14 N/A N/A Sold to another Preserve Argay, Lorraine D Dr. Robert H. Gore 7.05 $81,000 $81,000 Offer not accepted III Preserve Arnold, Emily Pepper Ranch 5.00 N/A N/A Property withdrawn Preserve Arnold, Vanette Panther Walk 1.14 $30,000 $30,000 Offer not accepted Preserve Big Hammock - Area I (Barron Pepper Ranch 257.3 $900,000 $900,000 Offer not accepted Collier Partnership) Preserve Casasierra Realty LLC Winchester Head 1.14 $25,650 $25,650 Property withdrawn Preserve Cedeno, Kenneth Dr. Robert H. Gore 2.81 $56,000 $56,000 Offer not accepted III Preserve Dahche, Ahmand Panther Walk 5.00 $130,000 $130,000 Offer not accepted Preserve D'Angelo, Eugene Dr. Robert H. Gore 5.00 $100,000 $100,000 Offer not accepted III Preserve Erjavec, Eugene Rivers Road 4.92 $200,000 $200,000 Offer not accepted Preserve Eschuk, Shari Rivers Road 4.78 $180,000 $180,000 Offer not accepted Preserve Fernandez, Erik Winchester Head 1.59 $39,800 $39,800 Offer not accepted Preserve Fischer Trust, Addison Marco Island 0.63 N/A N/A Property withdrawn Naughton, Veronica Panther Walk 2.73 N/A N/A Sold to another Preserve Higdon Trust, Garey D Winchester Head 1.59 $39,800 $35,820 Selling to another Preserve Macrina, Kathleen Panther Walk 1.14 N/A N/A Sold to another Preserve Magdalener, Josef Shell Island 18.73 N/A N/A Property withdrawn Preserve Moylan, Paul E Panther Walk 2.73 $63,000 $63,000 Offer not accepted Preserve Ortega, Gerardo Panther Walk 1.14 $30,000 $30,000 Property withdrawn Preserve Three Brothers Panther Walk 2.73 $63,000 $63,000 Offer not accepted Preserve WISC Investment - Inlet Dr Marco Island 0.39 $429,000 $429,000 Purchase Agreement not approved by BCC TOTAL CYCLE 10 A -LIST PROPERTIES THAT WILL NOT BE 402.11 $2,431,250 $2,427,270 Total number of properties = 23 ACQUIRED Packet Pg. 412 Conservation Collier Cycle 10, 11, 12, and 2024 Property Status Upda 28.A.Cl CYCLE 11A AAL APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ON DECEMBER 13, 2022 CYCLE 11A ACQUIRED PROPERTIES Size (ac) Appraised Value Closing Amount Annecy Marco LLC / Barfield Marco Island 2.13 $3,140,000 $3,140,000 Closed 1/5/24 Berman Trust, R F Dr. Robert H. Gore III 1.14 $30,000 $28,500 Closed 9/15/23 Preserve Fontela, Maricel Aleu Dr. Robert H. Gore III 1.14 $25,700 $25,700 Closed 12/8/23 Preserve Geren, Jonathan North Belle Meade 7.84 $129,500 $129,500 Closed 1/12/24 Preserve Gutierrez, Michael North Belle Meade 4.88 $85,400 $81,100 Closed 1/12/24 Preserve McGinnis, Patricia Panther Walk Preserve 1.14 $45,000 $42,800 Closed 11/17/23 Perez Castro, Pedro Dr. Robert H. Gore III 1.17 $29,000 $27,600 Closed 1/5/24 Preserve Perona, Barbara Winchester Head 1.59 $39,800 $39,800 Closed 12/1/23 Preserve Repola, Andrea Panther Walk Preserve 1.14 $45,000 $42,800 Closed 9/15/23 Scalley, William J and Martha Panther Walk Preserve 1.14 $45,000 $42,800 Closed 11/17/23 Scotti, Mary North Belle Meade 8.74 $135,500 $128,700 Closed 12/1/23 Preserve South Terra Corp Marco Island 0.56 $1,720,000 $1,620,000 Closed 1/5/24 Sponseller, Robert North Belle Meade 5.00 $90,000 $90,000 Closed 12/8/23 Preserve Trigoura, Delsina Dr. Robert H. Gore III 1.14 $30,000 $30,000 Closed 11/17/23 Preserve VanCleave, Matthew Rivers Road Preserve 0.50 $52,500 $52,500 Closed 12/8/23 Vaz, Maurice J Panther Walk Preserve 1.59 $57,500 $57,000 Closed 9/15/23 TOTAL CYCLE 11A ACQUIRED PROPERTIES 40.84 $5,699,900 $5,578,800 Total number of properties = 16 CYCLE 11A A -LIST PROPERTIES THAT WILL NOT BE ACQUIRED AT THIS TIME Size (ac) Appraised Value Final Offer Amount Agua Colina Marco Island 0.63 $1,120,000 $1,120,000 Purchase Agreement not approved by Board Berman Rev Trust, R F Panther Walk Preserve 1.17 $46,000 $43,700 No longer interested in selling Chestnut, Diane Marco Island 0.53 $627,500 $627,500 Offer not accepted Colon, Donna &Patricia Mack Dr. Robert H. Gore III Preserve 2.27 $39,500 $39,500 Selling to another S & B Properties of Marco LLC Marco Island 0.50 $570,000 $570,000 Offer not accepted Starnes, Hugh Caracara Prairie Preserve 4.54 $250,000 $250,000 Offer not accepted TOTAL CYCLE 11A A -LIST PROPERTIES THAT WILL NOT BE ACQUIRED 9.64 $2,653,000 $2,650,700 Total number of properties = 6 q N O N cl 21 7 d d r r E E O U O to Q C O N t� Q C O J a Packet Pg. 413 Conservation Collier Cycle 10, 11, 12, and 2024 Property Status Upda 28.A.d CYCLE 11B AAL APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ON FEBRUARY 28, 2023 CYCLE 11B ACQUIRED PROPERTIES Size (ac) Appraised Value Closing Amount Bailey, Scott and Christopher Winchester Head 1.59 $39,800 $38,500 Closed 1/19/24 Preserve Brewer, Richard N/A 14.78 $451,000 $405,900 Closed 12/15/23 Dibala Wood Trust Dr. Robert H. Gore III 18.28 $275,000 $261,300 Closed 12/15/23 Preserve Dredge Management Assoc LLC Shell Island Preserve 18.73 $1,592,500 $1,512,875 Closed 1/19/24 English Trust Pepper Ranch Preserve 59.01 $515,000 $463,500 Closed 1/19/24 Mooney/Hankins-Colon Winchester Head 1.59 $39,800 $39,800 Closed 2/16/24 Preserve Weir Trust, Celine Dr. Robert H. Gore III 2.27 $39,500 $37,500 Closed 12/8/23 Preserve Williams Nancy Payton Preserve 0.50 $60,000 $60,000 Closed 1/19/24 Wilson Trust Winchester Head 1.59 $39,800 $39,800 Closed 12/8/23 Preserve TOTAL CYCLE 11B ACQUIRED PROPERTIES 118.34 $3,052,400 $2,859,175 Total number of properties = 9 CYCLE 11B PROPERTIES PENDING ACQUISITION Appraised/Estimated Purchase Price/Estimated Property Name Preserve Size (ac) Value Value Acquisition Status Buckley Enterprises Nancy Payton Preserve 80.00 $780,000 $780,000 Offer Made; Seller response pending Descoteau, Donn & Donna* Dr. Robert H. Gore III 1.14 $25,100 $25,100 Offer accepted; Purchase Agreement pending Preserve probate TOTAL CYCLE 11B PROPERTIES PENDING ACQUISITION 81.14 $805,100 $805,100 Total number of properties = 2 CYCLE 11B A -LIST PROPERTIES THAT WILL NOT BE ACQUIRED AT THIS TIME Appraised/Estimated Final Offer Property Name Preserve Size (ac) Value Amount/Estimated Value Acquisition Status Khoury Otter Mound Preserve 0.43 N/A N/A Sold to another Lie, Run He Nancy Payton Preserve 0.50 $80,000 $80,000 Offer not accepted Owl Hammock N/A 7,378.00 TBD TBD On -hold pending State of Florida acquisition Relevant Radio, Inc. Mcllvane Marsh 10.46 $126,350 $126,350 Offer not accepted Preserve Sit/Chew Nancy Payton Preserve 3.00 $390,000 $390,000 Offer not accepted Smith & Montgomery Dr. Robert H. Gore III 2.73 N/A N/A Property withdrawn Preserve TOTAL CYCLE 11B A -LIST PROPERTIES THAT WILL NOT BE 7,395.12 $596,350 $596,350 Total number of properties = 6 ACQUIRED * Estimated Value used in calculations until Purchase Agreement is signed by Seller and scheduled for Collier County Board of County Commissioners meeting Packet Pg. 414 Conservation Collier Cycle 10, 11, 12, 2024 Property Status Updated June 2 28.A.Cl CYCLE 12A AAL APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ON OCTOBER 10, 2023 CYCLE 12A ACQUIRED PROPERTIES Property Name Preserve Size (ac) Appraised Value Closing Amount A & T Kleinberger Rev Trust Dr. Robert H. Gore III Preserve 5.00 $110,000 $104,500 Closed 3/15/24 TOTAL CYCLE 12A ACQUIRED PROPERTIES 5.00 $110,000 $104,500 Total number of properties =1 CYCLE 12A PROPERTIES PENDING ACQUISITION Appraised/Estimated Purchase Property Name Preserve Size (ac) Value Price/Estimated Acquisition Status Arnold Trust Dr. Robert H. Gore 7.16 $148,570 $141,140 Purchase Agreement approved by BCC 6/11/24; III Preserve Closine sched Beckert, Marc & Dr. Robert H. Gore 1.14 $26,220 $24,910 Purchase Agreement approved by BCC 6/11/24; Elizabeth III Preserve Closine Dendine CDL Naples Investment Dr. Robert H. Gore 2.73 $62,790 $59,650 Purchase Agreement approved by BCC 6/11/24, LLC III Preserve Closine Dendine Granados, Nelson Dr. Robert H. Gore 5.15 $106,860 $106,860 Purchase Agreement approved by BCC 6/11/24; III Preserve Closine Dendine JA Moulton Trust Dr. Robert H. Gore 7.17 $148,780 $141,340 Purchase Agreement approved by BCC 6/11/24; III Preserve Closine Dendine Land Genie LLC Dr. Robert H. Gore 2.73 $62,790 $62,790 Purchase Agreement approved by BCC 6/11/24; III Preserve Closine Dendine Langell Trust Dr. Robert H. Gore 2.81 $61,120 $58,060 Purchase Agreement approved by BCC 6/25/24; III Preserve Closine Dendine Murawski Trust North Belle Meade 4.87 $45,000 $42,750 Purchase Agreement approved by BCC 5/14/24; Preserve Closine scheduled for 7/24/24 Rodriguez, Mario & Panther Walk 5.46 $158,400 $158,400 Purchase Agreement approved by BCC 5/14/24; Gisela Preserve Closine scheduled for 7/12/24 Sardinas, Martha Dr. Robert H. Gore 2.34 $53,820 $53,820 Purchase Agreement approved by BCC 6/25/24; III Preserve Closine Dendine Taylor, Ernesto & Ana Dr. Robert H. Gore 5.00 $103,750 $98,650 Purchase Agreement approved by BCC 6/11/24; III Preserve Closine Dendine Volpe Trust North Belle Meade 8.50 $109,000 $103,550 Purchase Agreement approved by BCC 5/14/24; Preserve Closing scheduled for 7/24/24 Walsh, Nancy Red Maple Swamp 1.14 $20,520 $19,494 Purchase Agreement approved by BCC 6/11/24; Preserve Closine Dendine Whittingham Panther Walk 1.59 $46,110 $45,990 Purchase Agreement approved by BCC 5/14/24; Corporation Preserve Closing scheduled for8/16/24 Woodworth, Richard Dr. Robert H. Gore 2.27 $52,210 $49,600 Purchase Agreement approved by BCC 6/11/24; III Preserve Closine Dendine Subtotal - Properties with Board Approved 60.06 $1,205,940 $1,167,004 Subtotal number of properties = 15 Purchase Agreements Aristizabal Mcllvane Marsh 5.00 $20,000 $20,000 Offer accepted; Purchase Agreement scheduled Preserve for7/23/24 BCC Arndt, Linda* Winchester Head 1.14 $29,000 $29,000 Offer accepted; Purchase Agreement pending Preserve Ayra, Anacely Dr, Robert H. Gore 3.18 $65,190 $65,190 Offer accepted; Purchase Agreement scheduled III Preserve for 7/23/24 BCC Cassity, Cina Lu* Panther Walk 1.59 $50,400 $50,400 Offer accepted; Purchase Agreement pending Preserve Ebanks, Marvin* Winchester Head 1.14 $29,000 $29,000 Offer accepted; Purchase Agreement pending Preserve Hughes, Jeffrey & Panther Walk 1.59 $46,110 $46,110 Offer accepted; Purchase Agreement scheduled Melissa Preserve for 7/9/24 BCC Symphony Properties* N/A 150.00 $7,100,000 $7,100,000 Offer accepted; Purchase Agreement pending Veneziano, Steve* Panther Walk 1.14 $36,140 $36,140 Offer accepted; Purchase Agreement pending Preserve Vikon Corporation* Panther Walk 1.59 $50,400 $50,400 Offer made; Awaiting response Preserve Wilson, Kyle & Lisa Panther Walk 1.59 $46,110 $46,110 Offer accepted; Purchase Agreement scheduled Mason Preserve for 7/9/24 BCC Subtotal- Properties with Board Approval of 167.96 $7,472,350 $7,472,350 Subtotal number of properties = 10 Purchase Agreements Pending TOTAL CYCLE 12A PROPERTIES PENDING 228.02 $8,678,290 $8,639,354 Total number of properties = 25 ACQUISITION CYCLE 12A A -LIST PROPERTIES THAT WILL NOT BE ACQUIRED AT THIS TIME Property Name Preserve Size (ac) Appraised/Estimated Final Offer Acquisition Status Value Amount/Estimate Bleka, Joseph & Dr. Robert H. Gore 2.34 $53,820 $53,820 On -hold until title is clear Christina III Preserve TOTAL CYCLE 12A A -LIST PROPERTIES THAT 2.34 $53,820 $53,820 Total number of properties =1 WILL NOT BE ACQUIRED * Estimated Value used in calculations until Purchase Agreement is signed by Seller and scheduled for Collier County Board of County Commissioners meeting q N O N cM 2+ 7 d r r E E O U O N Q C O r .N M IS t,1 Q C O J a Packet Pg. 415 Conservation Collier Cycle 10, 11, 12, 2024 Property Status Updated June 26, 2$•A•d CYCLE 12B AAL APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ON JULY 25, 2024 CYCLE 12B ACQUIRED PROPERTIES Property Name Preserve Size (ac) Appraised Value Closing Amount TOTAL CYCLE 12A ACQUIRED PROPERTIES 0.00 $0 $0 Total number of properties = 0 CYCLE 12B PROPERTIES PENDING ACQUISITION Property Name Preserve Size (ac) Appraised/Estimated Purchase Acquisition Status Value Price/Estimated Subtotal - Properties with Board Approved 0.00 $0 $0 Subtotal number of properties = 0 Purchase Agreements Cypress Cove Dr. Robert H. Gore 10.00 $585,000 $585,000 Appraisal Ordered Conservancy* III Preserve Offer Made; Seller response pending Eid* Dr. Robert H. Gore 2.27 $46,000 $46,000 III Preserve Erickson* Dr. Robert H. Gore 1.14 $24,000 $24,000 Offer Made; Seller response pending III Preserve Hendrix House* N/A 17.66 $503,000 $503,000 Appraisal Ordered HK Investment* Marco Island 0.37 $800,000 $800,000 Appraisal Ordered Offer Made; Seller response pending Lynch* Winchester Head 1.14 $29,000 $29,000 Preserve Parraga* Dr. Robert H. Gore 2.81 $54,000 $54,000 Offer Made; Seller response pending III Preserve Pritchard* Dr. Robert H. Gore 2.27 $46,000 $46,000 Offer Made; Seller response pending III Preserve Seepersad* Dr. Robert H. Gore 1.14 $24,000 $24,000 Offer Made; Seller response pending III Preserve Sunny Florida Dr. Robert H. Gore 1.14 $24,000 $24,000 Offer Made; Seller response pending Investments, Inc* III Preserve Van Cleef* Marco Island 0.43 $950,000 $950,000 Appraisal Ordered Wildcat Acres* N/A 73.60 $1,357,800 $1,357,800 Appraisal Ordered Wildflowerz Ranch* N/A 639.17 $5,522,400 $5,522,400 Appraisal Ordered Subtotal - Properties with Board Approval of 753.14 $9,965,200 $9,965,200 Subtotal number of properties = 13 Purchase Agreements Pending TOTAL CYCLE 12B PROPERTIES PENDING 753.14 $9,965,200 $9,965,200 Total number of properties =13 ACQUISITION CYCLE 12B A -LIST PROPERTIES THAT WILL NOT BE ACQUIRED AT THIS TIME Appraised/Estimated Final Offer Property Name Preserve Size (ac) Value Amount/Estimate Acquisition Status TOTAL CYCLE 12B A -LIST PROPERTIES THAT 0.00 $0 $0 Total number of properties = 0 WILL NOT BE ACQUIRED * Estimated Value used in calculations until Purchase Agreement is signed by Seller and scheduled for Collier County Board of County Commissioners meeting. Packet Pg. 416 Conservation Collier Cycle 10, 11, 12, and 2024 Property Status June 26, 28.A.d 2024 CYCLE 2024 CYCLE ACQUIRED PROPERTIES Property Name Preserve Size (ac) Appraised Value Closing Amount TOTAL CYCLE 12A ACQUIRED PROPERTIES 0.00 $0 $0 Total number of properties = 0 2024 CYCLE PROPERTIES PENDING ACQUISITION Appraised/Estimated Purchase Property Name Preserve Size (ac) Value Price/Estimated Acquisition Status Williams Farms N/A 1,410.00 $11,980,000 $11,980,000 Purchase Agreement approved by BCC 5/28/24; Closing pending Subtotal - Properties with Board Approved 1,410.00 $11,980,000 $11,980,000 Subtotal number of properties = 1 Purchase Agreements Subtotal - Properties with Board Approval of 0.00 $0 $0 Subtotal number of properties = 0 Purchase Agreements Pending TOTAL CYCLE 12A PROPERTIES PENDING 1,410.00 $11,980,000 $11,980,000 Total number of properties = 1 ACQUISITION CYCLE 12A A -LIST PROPERTIES THAT WILL NOT BE ACQUIRED AT THIS TIME Appraised/Estimated Final Offer Property Name Preserve Size (ac) Acquisition Status Value Amount/Estimate TOTAL CYCLE 12A A -LIST PROPERTIES THAT 0.00 $0 $0 0 WILL NOT BE ACQUIRED Total number of properties = Q N O N CO) 3 d O E E O U O rn Q C O T is v a J a+ Q Packet Pg. 417 28.A.e Conservation Collier Initial Criteria Screening Report B and G Landholdings 29TH AVE SW rr 0 31STAVESVV w 32ND AVE SW ? m w_ O s y WHITE LAKFg �_ J RADIO RD Q y BECK BLVD LVD 175 B C 3u4 RD 71 � � a �a m m �< tr �� m U SNAKE Rp D Z ° 0 CLUB ESTATES Picayune Strand � DR Z J State Forest 62ND AVE SE Ej THE LORDS WAY 68FH AVE SE RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RD G) 0 o J m z ¢ > a o Q SABAL PALM RD ° T p A 2 m Q FO = z W K 1 O N 0 0.5 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Miles B&G LANDHOLDINGS LLC County property Acquisition Pending Conservation Collier Preserve Managed Conservation Areas Other Conservation Areas Owner Name: B and G Landholdings LLC Size: 21.68 acres Folio Number: 00331520000, 00458240506, 00460960007, 00467320802 Staff Report Date: July 3, 2024 Total Score: 195/400 180 160 160 140 120 100 87 80 80 80 80 80 60 40 26 20 2 0 1 - Ecological Value 2 - Human Value 3 - Restoration and 4 - Vulnerability Management ■Awarded Points ❑Possible Points Q Packet Pg. 418 28.A.e Initial Criteria Screening Report — B and G Landholdings Folio No: multiple Owner Name(S): B and G Landholdings LLC Date: 7/3/24 Table of Contents Tableof Contents......................................................................................................................................... 2 1. Introduction........................................................................................................................................... 4 2. Summary of Property............................................................................................................................ 5 Figure 1 - Parcel Location Overview...........................................................................................5 Figure 2a — North Parcel Close-up..............................................................................................6 Figure 2b—South Parcels Close-up............................................................................................7 2.1 Summary of Property Information....................................................................................................8 Table 1— Summary of Property Information..............................................................................8 Figure 3 - Secondary Criteria Score............................................................................................9 Table 2 - Secondary Criteria Score Summary.............................................................................9 2.2 Summary of Assessed Value and Property Cost Estimates........................................................... 10 Table 3. Assessed & Estimated Value...................................................................................... 10 2.2.1 Zoning, Growth Management and Conservation Overlays ................................................. 10 2.3 Summary of Initial Screening Criteria Satisfaction (Ord. 2002-63, as amended, Sec. 12) ........... 11 3. Initial Screening Criteria......................................................................................................................13 3.1 Ecological Values............................................................................................................................. 13 3.1.1 Vegetative Communities....................................................................................................... 13 Figure 4a — North Parcel CLIP4 Priority Natural Communities ................................................ 14 Figure 4b—South Parcels CLIP4 Priority Natural Communities ............................................... 15 Figure 5a — North Parcel Florida Cooperative Land Cover Classification System .................... 16 Figure 5b—South Parcels Florida Cooperative Land Cover Classification System ................... 17 Figure 6 — Cypress/Cabbage Palm that has been subjected to stand replacing wildfire ......... 18 3.1.2 Wildlife Communities............................................................................................................ 18 Table 4 — Listed Wildlife Detected........................................................................................... 18 Figure 7a — North Parcel Wildlife Spatial Data (i.e., telemetry, roosts, etc) ............................ 19 Figure 7b—South Parcels Wildlife Spatial Data (i.e., telemetry, roosts, etc) ........................... 20 Figure 8a — North Parcel CLIP4 Potential Habitat Richness ..................................................... 21 Figure 8b—South Parcels CLIP4 Potential Habitat Richness ................................................... 22 3.1.3 Water Resources................................................................................................................... 23 Figure 9a — North Parcel CLIP Aquifer Recharge Priority and Wellfield Protection Zones....... 24 Figure 9b—South Parcels CLIP Aquifer Recharge Priority and Wellfield Protection Zones..... 25 Figure 10a — North Parcel Collier County Soil Survey.............................................................. 26 2 Q Packet Pg. 419 28.A.e Initial Criteria Screening Report — B and G Landholdings Owner Name(S): B and G Landholdings LLC Folio No: multiple Date:7/3/24 Figure 10b — South Parcels Collier County Soil Survey .................................................. Figure 11a — North Parcel LIDAR Elevation Map........................................................... Figure 11b—South Parcels LIDAR Elevation Map .......................................................... 3.1.4 Ecosystem Connectivity.............................................................................................. Figure 12 - Conservation Lands............................................................................... 3.2 Human Values................................................................................................................. 3.2.1 Recreation............................................................................................................. 3.2.2 Accessibility........................................................................................................... 3.2.3 Aesthetic/Cultural Enhancement......................................................................... 3.3 Restoration and Management....................................................................................... 3.3.1 Vegetation Management...................................................................................... 3.3.1.1 Invasive Vegetation..................................................................................... 3.3.1.2 Prescribed Fire............................................................................................ 3.3.2 Remediation and Site Security.............................................................................. 3.3.3 Assistance.............................................................................................................. 3.4 Vulnerability.................................................................................................................... 3.4.1 Zoning and Land Use............................................................................................. Figure 13a — North Parcel Zoning............................................................................ Figure 13b - South Parcels Zoning........................................................................... Figure 14a — North Parcel Zoning Overlays............................................................. Figure 14b — South Parcels Zoning Overlays............................................................ Figure 15a — North Parcel Future Land Use............................................................. Figure 15b—South Parcels Future Land Use........................................................... 3.4.2 Development Plans............................................................................................... 4. Acquisition Considerations........................................................................................................ 5. Management Needs and Costs.................................................................................................... Table 5 - Estimated Costs of Site Remediation, Improvements, and Management 27 ...... 28 ...... 29 ...... 30 ...... 33 ...... 33 ...... 33 ...... 33 ...... 33 ...... 33 ...... 35 ...... 36 ...... 37 ...... 38 6. Potential for Matching Funds..............................................................................................................41 7. Secondary Criteria Scoring Form.........................................................................................................42 8. Additional Site Photos............................................................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. APPENDIX 1— Critical Lands and Water Identification Maps (CLIP) Definitions......................................49 39 40 41 41 3 Packet Pg. 420 28.A.e Initial Criteria Screening Report — B and G Landholdings Folio No: multiple Owner Name(S): B and G Landholdings LLC Date: 7/3/24 1. Introduction The Conservation Collier Program (Program) is an environmentally sensitive land acquisition and management program approved by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners (Board) in 2002 and by Collier County Voters in 2002 and 2006. The Program was active in acquisition between 2003 and 2011, under the terms of the referendum. Between 2011 and 2016, the Program was in management mode. In 2017, the Collier County Board reauthorized Conservation Collier to seek additional lands (2/14/17, Agenda Item 11B). On November 3, 2020, the Collier County electors approved the Conservation Collier Re-establishment referendum with a 76.5% majority. This Initial Criteria Screening Report (ICSR) has been prepared for the Conservation Collier Program to meet requirements specified in the Conservation Collier Implementation Ordinance, 2002-63, as amended, and for purposes of the Conservation Collier Program. The sole purpose of this report is to provide objective data to demonstrate how properties meet the criteria defined by the ordinance. The following sections characterize the property location and assessed value, elaborate on the initial and secondary screening criteria scoring, and describe potential funding sources, appropriate use, site improvements, and estimated management costs. m Q C N E t V 2 r Q 4 Packet Pg. 421 28.A.e Initial Criteria Screening Report — B and G Landholdings Owner Name(S): B and G Landholdings LLC 2. Summary of Property Folio No: multiple Date:7/3/24 29TH AVE SW 0 . 1 ❑ 31STAVE SW N w 32NDAVE SW m ?rp w s 9!� � � IT 5 wHlrC LAItE _ � `_� U ❑ 0 RADIO RD BLVD �� BECK BLVD f �- 175" BL,''CKBIJ ' RD u] ❑ Nt Off! m� LL w O! LL Q ❑ !� w w r Q^ L J ■ Cf) U SNAKE RD D z I D CLUB ESTATES DR Picayune Strand z State Forest 62ND AVE SE THE LORDS WAY 68TH AVE SE RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RD O ❑ z m rG z O C Q SABAL PALM RD [ifz 0 m O = z w of 0 0 0.5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Miles - B&G LANDHOLDINGS LLC ' County property Acquisition Pending Conservation Collier Preserve Managed Conservation Areas Other Conservation Areas Figure 1 - Parcel Location Overview CON ATION LLIER CA", County a 5 Packet Pg. 422 Initial Criteria Screening Report — B and G Landholdings Owner Name(S): B and G Landholdings LLC 28.A.e Folio No: multiple Date:7/3/24 0 " I I` 0 0.05 0.1 a Miles x County property (Hussey Acquisition) B&G HOLDINGS LLC (1.67 acres) 0 c ca m X Q I6 c a� CONS-E-R�'ATION E — C WE R U v Coder County Q Figure 2a — North Parcel Close-up 6 Packet Pg. 423 28.A.e Initial Criteria Screening Report — B and G Landholdings Folio No: multiple Owner Name(S): B and G Landholdings LLC Date: 7/3/24 0 0.5 1 2 3 Miles B&G LANDHOLDINGS LLC Figure 2b — South Parcels Close-up n Ui �ONSER ATION E C LLIER t� cC Go ev Couvxty � ~'�' r Q 4 Packet Pg. 424 28.A.e Initial Criteria Screening Report — B and G Landholdings Folio No: multiple Owner Name(S): B and G Landholdings LLC Date: 7/3/24 2.1 Summary of Property Information Table 1 — Summary of Property Information Characteristic Value Comments Name B & G Landholdings B and G Landholdings LLC Folio Number four 00331520000, 00458240506, 460960007, 467320802 Target Protection Area RFMUD Sending Not within a Target Protection Mailing Area Size 21.68 acres 4 non-contiguous parcels totaling 21.68 acres Section, Township, and 529; Twn49; R27 & 515, 21, 30; Twn 1.67-acre parcel north of 1-75; 3 parcels south of 1-75 Range 50; R27 Agricultural base zoning in Rural Fringe Mixed Use District (RFMUD) — 1 parcel north of 1-75 is Sending with A-RFMUD-Sending- the North Belle Meade Overlay (NBMO); 3 parcels south Zoning Category/TDRs of 1-75 are Sending within a Natural Resource Protection NBMO-NRPA Area (NRPA). All parcels have had, or are in the process of having, their first 2 TDRs/5 acres stripped, greatly reducing development potential Primarily AH — area close to water hazard that has a 1% chance of experiencing shallow flooding between 1-3 FEMA Flood Map feet each year; About X AE -area that has a 1% annual AH, AE, X500 chance of flooding and a 26/ chance over the life of a Category 30-year mortgage; Small portion is X500 - area inundated by 1% annual chance flooding with average depths of less than 1 foot Owner would remove metal storage container and tree Existing structures None house prior to County acquisition The parcels to the south are surrounded by Picayune Strand State Forest and undeveloped private parcels, the Undeveloped, northwestern parcel is adjacent kitty-corner on its SE Adjoining properties Conservation, Rural corner to a rural developed parcel with some clearing, a and their Uses Developed structure and a pond; The one parcel to the north is adjacent to undeveloped property on all sides, with the County's recently acquired Hussey property adjacent to the south and east. Development Plans Submitted None The 3 southern -most parcels are Picayune Strand State Forest in -holdings that are within the state's Florida Known Property Location Forever Acquisition boundary; however, the state is not Irregularities actively acquiring small parcels within Picayune at this time. Other County Dept None known Interest d c a� E z U M r Q Packet Pg. 425 28.A.e Initial Criteria Screening Report — B and G Landholdings Owner Name(S): B and G Landholdings LLC 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 160 1- Ecological Value Total Score: 195/400 80 80 80 26 a 1 2 - Human Value 3 - Restoration and Management ■ Awarded Points ❑ Possible Points Figure 3 - Secondary Criteria Score Table 2 - Secondary Criteria Score Summary Folio No: multiple Date:7/3/24 80 2 4 - Vulnerability Criteria Awarded Weighted Points Possible Weighted Points Awarded/Possible Points 1 - Ecological Value 87 160 54% 1.1 - Vegetative Communities 32 53 60% 1.2 - Wildlife Communities 24 27 90% 1.3 - Water Resources 13 27 50% 1.4 - Ecosystem Connectivity 17 53 33% 2 - Human Values 26 80 32% 2.1 - Recreation 11 34 33% 2.2 - Accessibility 14 34 42% 2.3 - Aesthetics/Cultural Enhancement 0 11 0% 3 - Restoration and Management 80 80 100% 3.1 - Vegetation Management 55 55 100% 3.2 - Remediation and Site Security 23 23 100% 3.3 - Assistance 2 2 100% 4 - Vulnerability 2 80 3% 4.1 - Zoning and Land Use 2 58 4% 4.2 - Development Plans 0 22 0% Total 195 400 49% 0 Q Packet Pg. 426 28.A.e Initial Criteria Screening Report — B and G Landholdings Folio No: multiple Owner Name(S): B and G Landholdings LLC Date: 7/3/24 2.2 Summary of Assessed Value and Property Cost Estimates The interest being appraised is fee simple "as is" for the purchase of the site. A value of the parcels was estimated using only one of the three traditional approaches to value, the sales comparison approach. It is based on the principal of substitution that an informed purchaser would pay no more for the rights in acquiring a particular real property than the cost of acquiring, without undue delay, an equally desirable one. Three properties were selected for comparison, each with similar site characteristics, utility availability, zoning classification and road access. No inspection was made of the properties or comparables used in this report and the Real Estate Services Department staff relied upon information solely provided by program staff. The valuation conclusion is limited only by the reported assumptions and conditions that no other known or unknown adverse conditions exist. If the Board of County Commissioners choose to acquire these properties, an appraisal by an independent Real Estate Appraiser will be obtained at that time. Pursuant to the Conservation Collier Purchase Policy, one appraisal is required for the B & G Landholdings parcels, which have an initial estimated valuation less than $500,000; 1 independent Real Estate Appraiser will value the subject properties and that appraisal report will be used to determine the offer made to the seller. Table 3. Assessed & Estimated Value Property owner Address Acreage Assessed EstimatedValue* Value** B & G Holdings LLC— FLN 00331520000 No address 1.67 $10,740 TBD B & G Landholdings LLC— FLN 00458240506 No address 4.82 $12,050 TBD B & G Landholdings LLC— FLN 00460960007 No address 10.19 $55,485 TBD B & G Landholdings LLC— FLN 00467320802 No address 5.00 $24,360 TBD TOTAL 21.68 $102,635 TBD * Assessed Value is obtained from the Property Appraiser's Website. The Assessed Value is based off the current use of the properties. **The Estimated Value for the parcels will be obtained from the Collier County Real Estate Services Department prior to BCC ranking. 2.2.1 Zoning, Growth Management and Conservation Overlays Zoning, growth management and conservation overlays will affect the value of a parcel. These parcels have a base zoning of Agriculture and are within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District (RFMUD) — Sending. within the North Belle Meade Overlay (NBMO), and within a Natural Resource Protection Area (NRPA). The one parcel north of 1-75 is within the North Belle Meade Overlay (NBMO); the three parcels south of 1-75 are Sending within a Natural Resource Protection Area (NRPA). All parcels have had, or are in the process of having, their first 2 TDRs/5 acres stripped, greatly reducing development potential. 10 m d Ln c a) U 2 r a Packet Pg. 427 28.A.e Initial Criteria Screening Report — B and G Landholdings Owner Name(S): B and G Landholdings LLC Folio No: multiple Date:7/3/24 2.3 Summary of Initial Screening Criteria Satisfaction (Ord. 2002-63, as amended, Sec. 12) Criteria 1: CLIP Prioritv 1 Natural Commun Does the property contain Upland Hardwood Forest, Scrub, Coastal Upland, Dry Prairie, or Upland Pine? NO Criteria 2: CLIP Priority 2 Natural Community Does the property contain Pine Flatwoods or Coastal Wetlands? YES Parcels contain Hydric Flatwoods Criteria 3: Other Native, Natural Communities Does the property contain other native, natural communities? N/A The parcels do contain Other Native Natural Communities, but already contain Hydric Flatwoods. Criteria 4: Human Social Values Does the property offer cultural values, appropriate access for natural resource -based recreation, and the enhancement of the aesthetic setting of Collier County? YES The northern parcel is adjacent to County owned property that will one day allow access to the parcel, which is currently only accessible along a rough trail behind a locked gate. The parcels to the south are within Picayune have existing trails through or near them. Criteria 5: Water Resources Does the property offer opportunities for protection of water resource values, including aquifer recharge, water quality enhancement, protection of wetland dependent species habitat, wildfire risk reduction, storm surge protection, and flood control? YES All the parcels, except one of the southern parcels, are mapped as containing hydric soils. All three of the southern parcels hold water during the wet season. Two of the four parcels are mapped as contributing significantly to aquifer recharge. Criteria 6: Biological and Ecological Value Does the property offer significant biological values, including biodiversity and listed species habitat? YES Panther telemetry points have been captured on and/or around all four parcels and all are within historic red -cockaded woodpecker habitat. Individually their small size does not offer significant biological values, but the three parcels to the south are contiguous to the larger Picayune Strand State Preserve. 11 d Ln r_ aD E M U 2 r a Packet Pg. 428 28.A.e Initial Criteria Screening Report — B and G Landholdings Folio No: multiple Owner Name(S): B and G Landholdings LLC Date: 7/3/24 Criteria 7: Enhancement of Current Conservation Lands Does the property enhance and/or protect the environmental value of current conservation lands through function as a buffer, ecological link, or habitat corridor? YES The parcels to the south are surrounded by Picayune Strand State Forest. Criteria 8: Target Area Is the property within a Board -approved target protection mailing area? NO The B & G Landholdings parcels met 5 out of the 8 Initial Screening Criteria. d c a� E M U 2 a 12 Packet Pg. 429 28.A.e Initial Criteria Screening Report — B and G Landholdings Folio No: multiple Owner Name(S): B and G Landholdings LLC Date: 7/3/24 3. Initial Screening Criteria 3.1 Ecological Values 3.1.1 Vegetative Communities The three southern B & G Landholdings parcels were inaccessible due to high water levels. Based upon the GIS map layer, aerial, and surrounding parcels, they appear to contain, Cypress, Cypress/Pine/Cabbage Palm, Wet Flatwoods. The northern parcel consists of Cypress/Pine Cabbage Palm. The Cypress/Cabbage Palm plant community has a mix of cypress (Taxodium spp.), Florida slash pine (Pinus elliotti var. densa), and cabbage palm (Saba) palmetto). Midstory is dominated by cabbage palm with some oak (Quercus sp.). Muscadine grape (Vitis rotundifolia) was observed in the groundcover. The Cypress community has a cypress canopy with some Carolina willow (Salix caroliniana) in the midstory and primarily sawgrass (Cladium jamaicense) in the groundcover. Wet flatwoods contain little canopy with sparse Florida slash pine and wax myrtle (Morelia cerifera) in the midstory and wire grass (Aristida stricta) and blue maidencane (Amphicarpum muehlenbergianum) in the groundcover. Invasive plants encountered include melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenervia), Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolia), and earleaf acacia (Acacia auriculiformis). The density of these exotics appeared to be approximately 20 — 25%. No listed plant species were observed during the site visit. d c a� E U 2 r a 13 Packet Pg. 430 28.A.e Initial Criteria Screening Report — B and G Landholdings Folio No: multiple Owner Name(S): B and G Landholdings LLC Date: 7/3/24 0 0.125 0.25 Miles 0 B&G HOLDINGS LLC (1.67 acres) CLIP4 Priority Natural Communities - C9 Priority 1 (highest) Priority 2 f° Priority 3 m Priority 4 � Q c a� CON ,R ATION t LLIER V M Coux o er Cty Figure 4a — North Parcel CLIP4 Priority Natural Communities 14 Packet Pg. 431 28.A.e Initial Criteria Screening Report — B and G Landholdings Folio No: multiple Owner Name(S): B and G Landholdings LLC Date: 7/3/24 I. 0 0.5 1 2 Miles Q B&G LANDHOLDINGS LLC CLIP4 Priority Natural Communities Priority 1 (highest) Priority 2 Priority 3 Priority 4 Figure 4b — South Parcels CLIP4 Priority Natural Communities 0 CONS-E-RVATION N C LLIfR t Go ev County � �'`, r V�3e Q 21 15 Packet Pg. 432 28.A.e Initial Criteria Screening Report - B and G Landholdings Folio No: multiple Owner Name(S): B and G Landholdings LLC Date: 7/3/24 0 0.125 0.25 Miles B&G HOLDINGS LLC (1.67 acres) Land Cover Cypress Hydric Pine Flatwoods - Mesic Flatwoods f° - Mixed Hardwood Coniferous Swamps m �- Mixed Scrub -Shrub Wetland Q Ui c d CONSE11_ ATION t LLIER C� cC Ca er Couxty �' Q Figure 5a - North Parcel Florida Cooperative Land Cover Classification System 16 Packet Pg. 433 28.A.e Initial Criteria Screening Report — B and G Landholdings Folio No: multiple Owner Name(S): B and G Landholdings LLC Date: 7/3/24 0 0.5 1 2 Miles B&G LANDHOLDINGS LLC Land Cover Artificial Impoundment/Reservoir Basin Marsh Cypress/Pine/Cabbage Palm Cypress/Tupelo(incl Cy/Tu mixed) Dome Swamp Exotic Wetland Hardwoods Extractive Fallow Cropland Glades Marsh Hydric Hammock Low Intensity Urban Mesic Flatwoods Mesic Hammock I Natural Rivers and Streams Residential, Low Density River Floodplain Lake/Swamp Lake Rural Open Rural Structures Strand Swamp Transportation Wet Flatwoods Wet Prairie Figure 5b — South Porcels Florida Cooperative Land Cover Classification System (ONS-E-RvATION r C LLIER Co ev Couvety 17 Q c a� E t U 2 r Q Packet Pg. 434 28.A.e Initial Criteria Screening Report — B and G Landholdings Folio No: multiple Owner Name(S): B and G Landholdings LLC Date: 7/3/24 Figure 6 — Representative Hydric Flatwoods within Picayune Strand State Forest 3.1.2 Wildlife Communities CLIP4 Species Richness Maps show potential for 2-13 focal species to utilize the parcels including federally endangered Florida panther, red -cockaded woodpecker, Florida bonneted bat, and state - threatened gopher tortoise and Big Cypress fox squirrel. Table 4 — Listed Wildlife Detected State Federal Common Name Scientific Name Mode of Detection Status Status Florida Panther Puma concolar coryi Endangered Endangered Telemetry 18 m d c as E U r a Packet Pg. 435 Initial Criteria Screening Report — B and G Landholdings Owner Name(S): B and G Landholdings LLC 28.A.e Folio No: multiple Date:7/3/24 A m m 0 z o m Uj 0 - 0 Q m 0 0 z A 0 A 0 0 AA 0 A 0 A 0 0 0 0 0 Q KEARNEYAVE E:f 0 0 0� A � g A o o o 0 90 0 0 o A 0 0 0 0 A A • 0 0.475 Miles Q B&G HOLDINGS LLC (1.67 acres) Red -cockaded Woodpecker Observation Locations A Florida Panther Telemetry 0 Black Bear Telemetry Figure 7a — North Parcel Wildlife Spatial Data (i.e., telemetry, roosts, etc) U N c 0.95 0 x c c� J 0 I � c a� CON�I��ALLI R ON E �a m 0' Couxty Q 19 Packet Pg. 436 28.A.e Initial Criteria Screening Report — B and G Landholdings Folio No: multiple Owner Name(S): B and G Landholdings LLC Date: 7/3/24 1 0 0.5 1 2 3 Miles ® B&G LANDHOLDINGS LLC Q Florida Panther Telemetry Black Bear Telemetry Figure 7b —South Parcels Wildlife Spatial Data (i.e., telemetry, roosts, etc) U C O N S-E-R ATI O N t CA10LUIR Go er Gouxty f ra' , cOC 20 Packet Pg. 437 28.A.e Initial Criteria Screening Report — B and G Landholdings Owner Name(S): B and G Landholdings LLC A ■ 0 0.125 Miles Q B&G HOLDINGS LLC (1.67 acres) VALUE ' 1 species 2-4 species 5-6 species 7 species 8-13 species Figure 8a — North Parcel CLIP4 Potential Habitat Richness Folio No: multiple Date:7/3/24 0.25 CONSEiRVATION C�DLLIER Co er Couxty 21 M Q Packet Pg. 438 28.A.e Initial Criteria Screening Report — B and G Landholdings Folio No: multiple Owner Name(S): B and G Landholdings LLC Date: 7/3/24 ■ ■ ■ i PL ti i %` .. ■ �' Z ■ 1 7y ■ . JFW.`LENrm W. �r LE 0 ■ ■ 1• .r 1 �i,• ■ ■ j� - - M■ o r 5ABALPAI_'M RD r ■ r • • ■ IL 7 ■ • f ,■"� • M% a , ■fir ; ■ ■ L 7 • Pi �• L • 1 i " i% ti fr 0 0.5 1 Miles B&G LANDHOLDINGS LLC VALUE 1 species 2-4 species 5-6 species 7 species 8-13 species Figure 8b —South Parcels CLIP4 Potential Habitat Richness 191 n CON5-E-RV�ATION C LLIER CAer Comity 22 Packet Pg. 439 28.A.e Initial Criteria Screening Report — B and G Landholdings Folio No: multiple Owner Name(S): B and G Landholdings LLC Date: 7/3/24 3.1.3 Water Resources All the parcels, except one of the southern parcels, are mapped as containing hydric soils. All three of the southern parcels, and most likely the northern parcel, hold water during the wet season. Two of the four parcels are mapped as contributing significantly to aquifer recharge. d c a� E M U 2 r a 23 Packet Pg. 440 28.A.e Initial Criteria Screening Report — B and G Landholdings Owner Name(S): B and G Landholdings LLC Folio No: multiple Date:7/3/24 0 0.125 0.25 Miles Q B&G HOLDINGS LLC (1.67 acres) Wellfield Protection Zones 1-YEAR 2-YEAR 5-YEAR - - - 20-YEAR CLIP4 Aquifer Recharge x Priority 1- HIGHEST — Priority 2 - Priority 3 F— Priority 4 CON R ATION Priority 5 rrIrR Priority 6 Figure 9a — North Parcel CLIP Aquifer Recharge Priority and Wellfield Protection Zones 24 Q Packet Pg. 441 28.A.e Initial Criteria Screening Report — B and G Landholdings Folio No: multiple Owner Name(S): B and G Landholdings LLC Date: 7/3/24 0 0.5 1 2 3 Miles 0 B&G LANDHOLDINGS LLC Wellfield Protection Zones 1-YEAR 2-YEAR 5-YEAR - _ - 20-Y EAR CLIP4 Aquifer Recharge Priority 1- HIGHEST Priority 2 Priority 3 1— Priority 4 Priority 5 Priority 6 CONS-ER�ATION C LLIER Colter CauHt V Figure 9b — South Parcels CLIP Aquifer Recharge Priority and Wellfield Protection Zones 25 M Q Ui c d t c� r Q Packet Pg. 442 28.A.e Initial Criteria Screening Report — B and G Landholdings Folio No: multiple Owner Name(S): B and G Landholdings LLC Date: 7/3/24 0 0.125 0.25 Miles B&G HOLDINGS LLC (1.67 acres) Collier County Soils BOCA FINE SAND OLDSMAR FINE SAND, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM f° RIVIERA FINE SAND, LIMESTONE m SUBSTRATUM Figure 10a — North Parcel Collier County Soil Survey CONSEiRVATION E COLLIER V Co er County Q b. 26 Packet Pg. 443 28.A.e Initial Criteria Screening Report — B and G Landholdings Folio No: multiple Owner Name(S): B and G Landholdings LLC Date: 7/3/24 0 0.5 1 2 3 B&G LANDHOLDINGS LLC Collier County Soils [ BOCA FINE SAND BOCA, RIVIERA, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM AND COPELAND FS, DEPRESSIONAL HALLANDALE AND BOCA FINE SANDS HALLANDALE FINE SAND HOLOPAW FINE SAND, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM OCHOPEE FINE SANDY LOAM OCHOPEE FINE SANDY LOAM, LOW OLDSMAR FINE SAND, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM Miles PENNSUCCO SILT LOAM PINEDA FINE SAND, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM RIVIERA FINE SAND, LIMESTON SUBSTRATUM 4 Figure 10b —South Parcels Collier County Soil Survey IN CON ATION LLIER Go er County ty F 27 M Q c a� E t U r Q Packet Pg. 444 28.A.e Initial Criteria Screening Report — B and G Landholdings Owner Name(S): B and G Landholdings LLC Folio No: multiple Date:7/3/24 0 0.125 0.25 Miles Q B&G HOLDINGS LLC (1.67 acres) LIDAR Value --- High : 104.644 - Low: -4.11745 Figure 11a — North Parcel LIDAR Elevation Map H CON TION t LLIER V C:a ev (:'a city Q 28 Packet Pg. 445 28.A.e Initial Criteria Screening Report — B and G Landholdings Folio No: multiple Owner Name(S): B and G Landholdings LLC Date: 7/3/24 /1 1 0 0 J M co Of Ui n Z Q SABAL PALM RD 0.5 1 Miles = B&G LANDHOLDINGS LLC LIDAR Value High : 104.644 Low: -4.11745 Figure 11b —South Parcels LIDAR Elevation Map CONS, ATION LLIER Cnty Fljc�YO' 29 a Packet Pg. 446 28.A.e Initial Criteria Screening Report — B and G Landholdings Folio No: multiple Owner Name(S): B and G Landholdings LLC Date: 7/3/24 3.1.4 Ecosystem Connectivity The three southern parcels are in -holdings within Picayune Strand State Forest, surrounded by conservation parcels or undeveloped private lands. The northern -most parcel is surrounded by undeveloped, private land and undeveloped, County -owned land. 30 Packet Pg. 447 28.A.e Initial Criteria Screening Report — B and G Landholdings Owner Name(S): B and G Landholdings LLC Folio No: multiple Date:7/3/24 29THAVE SW ❑ rr ❑ 31STAVE SW N w 32ND AVE SW m z W w - 11711BLACKBURNN O ❑ rY 9<1 o 7 v '75 VVH'TE LAKE �r RADIO RD �� BECK BLVD BLVL) �`�—� RD ❑ W OLL ``� W W J W CO 0 W J O SNAKE RD D z a r< CLUB ESTATES DR Picayune Strand z State Forest 62ND AVE SE THE LORDS WAY RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RD 68TH AVE SE O ❑ o Z J m rG w z z a Q (D z SABAL PALM RD O )0E- = Z p J 0 m Q Ui O U) 0 0.5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Miles i B&G LANDHOLDINGS LLC County property Acquisition Pending Conservation Collier Preserve Managed Conservation Areas Other Conservation Areas Figure 12 - Conservation Lands CON ATION LLIER Q 31 Packet Pg. 448 28.A.e Initial Criteria Screening Report — B and G Landholdings Folio No: multiple Owner Name(S): B and G Landholdings LLC Date: 7/3/24 3.2 Human Values 3.2.1 Recreation The northern parcel is adjacent to County owned property that will one day allow access to the parcel, which is currently only accessible along a rough trail behind a locked gate. The parcels to the south are within Picayune State Forest and have existing, non -vehicular trails through or near them. 3.2.2 Accessibility The parcels are accessed via existing trails and are accessible seasonally, as they hold water during the wet season. 3.2.3 Aesthetic/Cultural Enhancement These parcels provide no outstanding Aesthetic/Cultural Enhancement. d c a� E M U 2 r a 32 Packet Pg. 449 28.A.e Initial Criteria Screening Report — B and G Landholdings Folio No: multiple Owner Name(S): B and G Landholdings LLC Date: 7/3/24 3.3 Restoration and Management 3.3.1 Vegetation Management 3.3.1.1 Invasive Vegetation Invasive vegetation infestation rates appear to be relatively low on these parcels, based on surrounding lands. Invasive plants encountered include melaleuca, Brazilian pepper, and earleaf acacia 3.3.1.2 Prescribed Fire These parcels would benefit from regular prescribed burning. However, it would not be practical to burn these small, stand-alone parcels individually. Conservation Collier would coordinate with the Florida Forest Service during any adjacent prescribed burns. 3.3.2 Remediation and Site Security Cabbage palm thinning on the northern parcel and invasive species control on all parcels would be recommended. The remoteness of the parcels limits trespass. 3.3.3 Assistance Prescribed fire assistance from the Florida Forest Service is predicted should that agency burn adjacent lands. 3.4 Vulnerability 3.4.1 Zoning and Land Use These parcels are within the RFMUD - Sending. All parcels have had, or are in the process of having, the first 2 TDRs/5 acres stripped. Therefore, the development of a dwelling unit is no longer an allowable use on any of the parcels. Below are the remaining potential uses on the parcels: 1. Agricultural uses consistent with Sections 163.3162 and 823.14(6) Florida Statutes (Florida Right to Farm Act), including water management facilities, to the extent and intensity that such operations exist at the date of any transfer of development rights. 2. Cattle grazing on unimproved pasture where no clearing is required; 3. Habitat preservation and conservation uses. 4. Passive parks and passive recreational uses. 5. Those essential services identified in section 2.01.03 B. (Private wells and septic tanks, utility lines, sewer lines and lift stations only if within already cleared existing rights of way or easements, water pumping stations, Conservation Collier lands, and Aviation related uses as approved in the September 11, 2001 Memorandum of Understanding between Collier County Airport Authority and the Intervenor Signatories to the Deltona Settlement Agreement (July 20, 1982)). 6. Oil and gas exploration, subject to applicable state and federal drilling permits and Collier County non -environmental site development plan review procedures. Directional -drilling and/or previously cleared or disturbed areas shall be utilized in order to minimize impacts to native habitats, where determined to be practicable. This requirement shall be deemed satisfied upon issuance of a state permit in compliance with the criteria established in Chapter 62C-25 through 62C-30, F.A.C., as those rules existed on Oct. 3, 2005 [the effective date of this provision], regardless of whether the activity occurs within the Big Cypress Watershed, as 33 d Ln c a) E U 2 r a Packet Pg. 450 28.A.e Initial Criteria Screening Report — B and G Landholdings Folio No: multiple Owner Name(S): B and G Landholdings LLC Date: 7/3/24 defined in Rule 62C-30.001(2), F.A.C. All applicable Collier County environmental permitting requirements shall be considered satisfied by evidence of the issuance of all applicable federal and/or state oil and gas permits for proposed oil and gas activities in Collier County, so long as the state permits comply with the requirements of Chapter 62C-25 through 62C-30, F.A.C. For those areas of Collier County outside the boundary of the Big Cypress Watershed, the applicant shall be responsible for convening the Big Cypress Swamp Advisory Committee as set forth in Section 377.42, F.S., to assure compliance with Chapter 62C-25 through 62C-30, F.A.C., even if outside the defined Big Cypress Watershed. All oil and gas access roads shall be constructed and protected from unauthorized uses according to the standards established in Rule 62C- 30.005(2)(a)(1) through (12), F.A.C. 7. Mitigation in conjunction with any County, state, or federal permitting. d c a� E z U 2 r Q 34 Packet Pg. 451 28.A.e Initial Criteria Screening Report — B and G Landholdings Owner Name(S): B and G Landholdings LLC I B&G HOLDINGS LLC (1.67 acres) Zoning General A Figure 13a — North Parcel Zoning Folio No: multiple Date:7/3/24 0.125 0.25 Miles '\ I CON ATION LLIER Co er Cmitty 35 Q Packet Pg. 452 28.A.e Initial Criteria Screening Report — B and G Landholdings Folio No: multiple Owner Name(S): B and G Landholdings LLC Date: 7/3/24 0 0.5 1 2 3 Miles = B&G LANDHOLDINGS LLC Zoning General A MPUD Figure 13b - South Parcels Zoning U H CON �WwATION t NO LLIER V Co e-r County Q 36 Packet Pg. 453 28.A.e Initial Criteria Screening Report — B and G Landholdings Folio No: multiple Owner Name(S): B and G Landholdings LLC Date: 7/3/24 0 0.125 0.25 Miles WILLIAM & MARTHADIVELEY TRUST Zoning Overlay RFMUO-NRPA-NBMO-SENDING Figure 14a — North Parcel Zoning Overlays �. H Q I I d CONSEAA ATION E C LLIER C� cC Ca er Couxty �' Q 37 Packet Pg. 454 28.A.e Initial Criteria Screening Report — B and G Landholdings Folio No: multiple Owner Name(S): B and G Landholdings LLC Date: 7/3/24 0 0.5 1 2 3 Miles F. B&G LANDHOLDINGS LLC Zoning Overlay RFMUO-NRPA-SENDING RFMUO-SENDING Figure 24b —South Parcels Zoning Overlays L CONSERVATION E � t� C LLIER 38 Packet Pg. 455 28.A.e Initial Criteria Screening Report — B and G Landholdings Folio No: multiple Owner Name(S): B and G Landholdings LLC Date: 7/3/24 0 0.125 0.25 Miles B&G HOLDINGS LLC (1.67 acres) Future Land Use r RF-Receiving L RF-Sending Figure 15a — North Parcel Future Land Use COHSE-R- ATION t C LLIER V 39 Packet Pg. 456 28.A.e Initial Criteria Screening Report — B and G Landholdings Folio No: multiple Owner Name(S): B and G Landholdings LLC Date: 7/3/24 0 0.5 1 2 Miles B&G LANDHOLDINGS LLC Future Land Use Agricultural I Mural Designation RF-Sending Figure 15b —South Parcels Future Land Use J N e I d CON WATION t LLIER V M co e-r GmHty a 40 Packet Pg. 457 28.A.e Initial Criteria Screening Report — B and G Landholdings Folio No: multiple Owner Name(S): B and G Landholdings LLC Date: 7/3/24 3.4.2 Development Plans Currently, no development is planned for the parcels. Because the first level of TDRs have been stripped, no homes could be built on the parcels. 4. Acquisition Considerations Staff would like to bring the following items to the attention of the Advisory Committee during the review of this property. The following does not affect the scoring. The following are items that will be addressed in the Executive Summary to the Board of County Commissioners if this property moves forward for ranking. The southern parcels are inholdings within Picayune Strand State Forest and are within the State's Florida Forever boundary. Conservation Collier contacted the Florida Division of State Lands Bureau of Real Estate Services to see whether the state would be interested in acquiring these parcels. The state is not currently targeting parcels in this area for acquisition. Additionally, the development of a dwelling unit is no longer an allowable use on any of the parcels. 5. Management Needs and Costs Table S - Estimated Costs of Site Remediation, Improvements, and Management Management Initial Annual Comments Element Cost Recurring Cost Invasive Vegetation $4,300 $3,250 $200/acre initial, $150/acre recurring; 21.68 acres Removal Cabbage Palm $6,700 N/A $400/acre within 1.67 acres Treatment Total j $11,000 j $3,250 6. Potential for Matching Funds There are no known matching funds or partnership opportunities for acquisition in this area. d c a� E U 2 r a 41 Packet Pg. 458 28.A.e Initial Criteria Screening Report — B and G Landholdings Folio No: multiple Owner Name(S): B and G Landholdings LLC Date: 7/3/24 7. Secondary Criteria Scoring Form Property Name: B & G Landholdings Target Protection Mailing Area: N/A Folio(s): 00331520000, 00458240506, 00460960007, 00467320802 Secondary Criteria Scoring Possible Points Awarded Points percentage 1 - Ecological Value 160 87 54 2 - Human Value 80 26 32 3 - Restoration and Management 80 80 100 4 - Vulnerability 80 2 3 TOTALSCORE 400 195 49 1 - ECOLOGICAL VALUES (40% of total) Possible Awarded Comments Points Points 1.1 VEGETATIVE COMMUNITIES 200 120 1.1.1- Priority natural communities (Select highest score) a. Parcel contains CLIP4 Priority 1 communities (1130 - Rockland Hammock, 1210 - Scrub, 1213 - Sand Pine Scrub, 1214 - Coastal Scrub, 1312 - Scrubby Flatwoods, 1610 - Beach Dune, 1620 - Coastal Berm, 100 1630 - Coastal Grasslands, 1640 - Coastal Strand, or 1650 - Maritime Hammock) b. Parcel contains CLIP4 Priority 2 communities (22211 - Hydric Pine Hydric Flatwoods, 2221 - Wet Flatwoods, or 1311- Mesic Flatwoods) 60 60 Flatwoods c. Parcel contains CLIP4 Priority 3 communities (5250 - Mangrove Swamp, or 5240 - Salt Marsh) 50 d. Parcel contains CLIP4 Priority 4 communities (5250 - Mangrove Swamp) 25 1.1.2 - Plant community diversity (Select the highest score) a. Parcel has >_ 3 CLC native plant communities (Florida Cooperative Land Cover Classification System native plant communities) 20 20 b. Parcel has <_ 2 CLC native plant communities 10 c. Parcel has 0 CLC native plant communities 0 1.1.3 - Listed plant species (excluding commercially exploited species) (Select the highest score) a. Parcel has >_5 CLC listed plant species 30 b. Parcel has 3-4 CLC listed plant species 20 c. Parcel has <_ 2 CLC listed plant species 10 d. Parcel has 0 CLC listed plant species 0 0 none observed 1.1.4 - Invasive Plant Infestation (Select highest score) a. 0 - 10% infestation 50 b. 10 - 25% infestation 40 40 estimate c. 25 - 50% infestation 30 42 Q c a� E z U M r Q Packet Pg. 459 28.A.e Initial Criteria Screening Report — B and G Landholdings Folio No: multiple Owner Name(S): B and G Landholdings LLC Date: 7/3/24 d. 50 - 75% infestation 20 e. >_75% infestation 10 1.2 - WILDLIFE COMMUNITIES 100 90 1.2.1- Listed wildlife species (Select the highest score) a. Listed wildlife species documented on the parcel 80 80 FL panther b. Listed wildlife species documented on adjacent property 60 c CLIP Potential Habitat Richness >_5 species 40 d. No listed wildlife documented near parcel 0 1.2.2 - Significant wildlife habitat (Rookeries, roosts, denning sites, nesting grounds, high population densities, etc) (Select highest score) a. Parcel protects significant wildlife habitat (Please describe) 20 b. Parcel enhances adjacent to significant wildlife habitat (Please describe) 10 10 adjacent to Picayune c. Parcel does not enhance significant wildlife habitat 0 1.3 - WATER RESOURCES 100 50 1.3.1- Aquifer recharge (Select the highest score) a. Parcel is located within a wellfield protection zone or within a CLIP4 Aquifer Recharge Priority 1 area 40 b. Parcel is located within a CLIP4 Aquifer Recharge Priority 2 or 3 area 30 c. Parcel is located within a CLIP4 Aquifer Recharge Priority 4 or 5 area 20 20 2 parcels in 6 1 in 4 and 1 in 3 d. Parcel is located within a CLIP4 Aquifer Recharge Priority 6 area 0 1.3.2 - Surface Water Protection (Select the highest score) a. Parcel is contiguous with and provides buffering for an Outstanding Florida Waterbody 30 b. Parcel is contiguous with and provides buffering for a creek, river, lake, canal or other surface water body 20 c. Parcel is contiguous with and provides buffering for an identified flowway 15 d. Wetlands exist on site 10 10 e. Parcel does not provide opportunities for surface water quality enhancement 0 1.3.3 - Floodplain Management (Select all that apply) a. Parcel has depressional or slough soils 10 10 b. Parcel has known history of flooding and is likely to provide onsite water attenuation 10 10 c. Parcel provides storm surge buffering 10 d. Parcel does not provide floodplain management benefits 0 1.4 - ECOSYSTEM CONNECTIVITY 200 65 1.4.1 - Acreage (Select Highest Score) a. Parcel is >_ 300 acres 150 b. Parcel is >_ 100 acres 100 43 d Ln c aD E z U 2 r Q Packet Pg. 460 28.A.e Initial Criteria Screening Report — B and G Landholdings Folio No: multiple Owner Name(S): B and G Landholdings LLC Date: 7/3/24 b. Parcel is >_ 50 acres 75 c. Parcel is >_ 25 acres 25 d. Parcel is >_ 10 acres 15 15 e. Parcel is < 10 acres 0 1.4.2 - Connectivity (Select highest score) a. Parcel is immediately contiguous with conservation lands 50 50 b. Parcel is not immediately contiguous, but parcels between it and nearby conservation lands are undeveloped 25 c. Parcel is isolated from conservation land 0 ECOLOGICAL VALUES TOTAL POINTS 600 325 ECOLOGICAL VALUES WEIGHTED SCORE (Awarded Points/Possible Points*160) 160 87 2 - HUMAN VALUES (20%) Possible Points Awarded Points Comments 2.1 - RECREATION 120 40 2.1.1- Compatible recreation activities (Select all that apply) a. Hunting 20 20 b. Fishing 20 c. Water -based recreation (paddling, swimming, etc) 20 d. Biking 20 e. Equestrian 20 f. Passive natural -resource based recreation (Hiking, photography, wildlife watching, environmental education, etc) 20 20 g. Parcel is incompatible with nature -based recreation 0 2.2 - ACCESSIBILITY 120 50 2.2.1- Seasonality (Select the highest score) a. Parcel accessible for land -based recreation year round 20 b. Parcel accessible for land -based recreation seasonally 10 10 c. Parcel is inaccessible for land -based recreation 0 2.2.2 - Vehicle access (Select the highest score) a. Public access via paved road 50 b. Public access via unpaved road 30 c. Public access via private road 20 20 d. No public access 0 2.2.3 - Parking Availability (Select the highest score) a. Minor improvements necessary to provide on -site parking 40 b. Major improvements necessary to provide on -site parking (Requires site development plan) 25 b. Public parking available nearby or on adjacent preserve 20 20 c. Street parking available 10 d No public parking available 0 44 Q v; c aD E z U 2 r Q Packet Pg. 461 28.A.e Initial Criteria Screening Report — B and G Landholdings Folio No: multiple Owner Name(S): B and G Landholdings LLC Date: 7/3/24 2.2.4 - Pedestrian access (Select the highest score) a. Parcel is easily accessible to pedestrians (within walking distance of housing development) 10 b. Parcel is not easily accessible to pedestrians 0 0 2.3 - AESTHETICS/CULTURAL ENHANCEMENT 40 0 2.3.1- Aesthetic/cultural value (Choose all that apply) a. Mature/outstanding native vegetation 5 b. Scenic vistas 5 c. Frontage enhances aesthetics of public thoroughfare 10 d. Archaeological/historical structures present 15 e. Other (Please describe) 5 f. None 0 0 HUMAN VALUES TOTAL SCORE 280 90 HUMAN VALUES WEIGHTED SCORE (Awarded Points/Possible Points*80) 80 26 3 - RESTORATION AND MANAGEMENT (20%) Possible Awarded Comments Points Points 3.1 - VEGETATION MANAGEMENT 120 120 3.1.1- Invasive plant management needs (Select the highest score) a. Minimal invasive/nuisance plant management necessary to restore Based on and maintain native plant communities (<30%) 100 100 surrounding lands b. Moderate invasive/nuisance plant management necessary to restore and maintain native plant communities (30-65%) 75 c. Major invasive/nuisance plant management necessary to restore and maintain native plant communities (>65%) 50 d. Major invasive/nuisance plant management and replanting necessary to restore and maintain native plant communities (>65%) 25 e. Restoration of native plant community not feasible 0 3.1.2 - Prescribed fire necessity and compatibility (Select the highest score) a. Parcel contains fire dependent plant communities and is compatible with prescribed fire or parcel does not contain fire dependent plant 20 20 communities b. Parcel contains fire dependent plant communities and is incompatible with prescribed fire 0 3.2 - REMEDIATION AND SITE SECURITY 50 50 3.2.1- Site remediation and human conflict potential (Dumping, contamination, trespassing, vandalism, other) (Select the highest score) a. Minimal site remediation or human conflict issues predicted 50 50 b. Moderate site remediation or human conflict issues predicted (Please describe) 20 45 d v; c aD E z U 2 r Q Packet Pg. 462 28.A.e Initial Criteria Screening Report — B and G Landholdings Folio No: multiple Owner Name(S): B and G Landholdings LLC Date: 7/3/24 c. Major site remediation or human conflict issues predicted (Please 5 describe) d. Resolving site remediation or human conflict issues not feasible 0 3.3 - ASSISTANCE 5 5 3.4.1- Management assistance by other entity FFS a. Management assistance by other entity likely 5 5 prescribed fire b. Management assistance by other entity unlikely 0 RESTORATION AND MANAGEMENT TOTAL SCORE 175 175 RESTORATION AND MANAGEMENT WEIGHTED SCORE (Awarded 80 80 Points/Possible Points*80) 4 - VULNERABILITY (20%) &�� Possible Points Awarded Points Comments 4.1- ZONING AND LAND USE 130 5 4.1.1- Zoning and land use designation (Select the highest score) a. Zoning allows for Single Family, Multifamily, industrial or commercial 100 b. Zoning allows for density of no greater than 1 unit per 5 acres 75 c. Zoning allows for agricultural use /density of no greater than 1 unit per 40 acres 50 d. Zoning favors stewardship or conservation 0 0 4.1.2 - Future Land Use Type (Select the highest score) a. Parcel designated Urban 30 b. Parcel designated Estates, Rural Fringe Receiving and Neutral, Agriculture 25 c. Parcel designated Rural Fringe Sending, Rural Lands Stewardship Area 5 5 d. Parcel is designated Conservation 0 4.2 - DEVELOPMENT PLANS 50 0 4.2.1- Development plans (Select the highest score) a. Parcel has been approved for development 20 b. SFWMD and/or USACOE permit has been applied for or SDP application has been submitted 15 c. Parcel has no current development plans 0 0 4.2.2 - Site characteristics amenable to development (Select all that apply) a. Parcel is primarily upland 10 b. Parcel is along a major roadway 10 c. Parcel is >10 acres 5 d. Parcel is within 1 mile of a current or planned commercial or multi- unit residential development 5 VULNERABILITY TOTAL SCORE 180 5 VULNERABILITY WEIGHTED SCORE (Awarded Points/Possible Points*80) 80 2 W. d Ln c W E z U 2 r Q Packet Pg. 463 28.A.e Initial Criteria Screening Report — B and G Landholdings Folio No: multiple Owner Name(S): B and G Landholdings LLC Date: 7/3/24 Northern 1.67-acre parcel — Cypress/Pine/Cabbage Palm Representative Cypress within Picayune Strand State Forest Q c a� E z U 2 r Q 47 Packet Pg. 464 28.A.e Initial Criteria Screening Report — B and G Landholdings Owner Name(S): B and G Landholdings LLC Impassible trail leading to one of the southern parcels Folio No: multiple Date:7/3/24 d c as E M U 2 r a Packet Pg. 465 28.A.e Initial Criteria Screening Report — B and G Landholdings Folio No: multiple Owner Name(S): B and G Landholdings LLC Date: 7/3/24 APPENDIX 1— Critical Lands and Water Identification Maps (CLIP) Definitions This report makes use of data layers from the Florida Natural Areas Inventory and University of Florida Critical Lands and Waters Identification Project (CLIP4). CLIP4 is a collection of spatial data that identify statewide priorities for a broad range of natural resources in Florida. It was developed through a collaborative effort between the Florida Areas Natural Inventory (FNAI), the University of Florida GeoPlan Center and Center for Landscape Conservation Planning, and the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC). It is used in the Florida Forever Program to evaluate properties for acquisition. CLIP4 is organized into a set of core natural resource data layers which are representative of 5 resource categories: biodiversity, landscapes, surface water, groundwater and marine. The first 3 categories have also been combined into the Aggregated layer, which identifies 5 priority levels for natural resource conservation. Below is a description of each of the three CLIP4 data layers used in this report. Fieures 4a and 4b - CLIP4 Prioritv Natural Communities Consists of 12 priority natural community types: upland glades, pine rocklands, seepage slopes, scrub, sandhill, sandhill upland lakes, rockland hammock, coastal uplands, imperiled coastal lakes, dry prairie, upland pine, pine flatwoods, upland hardwood forest, or coastal wetlands. These natural communities are prioritized by a combination of their heritage global status rank (G-rank) and landscape context, based on the Land Use Intensity Index (subset of CLIP Landscape Integrity Index) and FNAI Potential Natural Areas. Priority 1 includes G1-G3 communities with Very High or High landscape context. Priority 2 includes G1-G3 Medium and G4 Very High/High. Priority 3 includes G4 Medium and G5 Very High/High. Priority 5 is G5 Medium. This data layer was created by FNAI originally to inform the Florida Forever environmental land acquisition program. The natural communities were mapped primarily based on the FNAI/FWC Cooperative Land Cover (CLC) data layer, which is a compilation of best -available land cover data for the entire state. The CLC is based on both remote -sensed (from aerial photography, primarily from water management district FLUCCS data) and ground-truthed (from field surveys on many conservation lands) data. Fieures 8a and 8b - CLIP4 Potential Habitat Richness This CLIP version 4.0 data layer is unchanged from CLIP v3.0. FWC Potential Habitat Richness. Because Strategic Habitat Conservation Areas (SHCA)s do not address species richness, FWC also developed the q Ln potential habitat richness layer to identify areas of overlapping vertebrate species habitat. FWC c created a statewide potential habitat model for each species included in their analysis. In some cases, E only a portion of the potential habitat was ultimately designated as SHCA for each species. The U Potential Habitat Richness layer includes the entire potential habitat model for each species and a provides a count of the number of species habitat models occurring at each location. The highest number of focal species co-occurring at any location in the model is 13. 49 Packet Pg. 466 28.A.e Initial Criteria Screening Report — B and G Landholdings Folio No: multiple Owner Name(S): B and G Landholdings LLC Date: 7/3/24 Figures 9a and 9b - CLIP4 Aquifer Recharge Priority and Wellfield Protection Zones High priorities indicate high potential for recharge to an underlying aquifer system (typically the Floridan aquifer but could be intermediate or surficial aquifers in some portions of the state). The highest priorities indicate high potential for recharge to springs or public water supplies. This figure also includes Wellfield Protection Zones. Collier County Wellfield Protection Zones are referenced in the Land Development Code and updated in 2010 by Pollution Control and Prevention Department Staff. The public water supply wellfields, identified in section 3.06.06 and permitted by the SFWMD for potable water to withdraw a minimum of 100,000 average gallons per day (GPD), are identified as protected wellfields, around which specific land use and activity (regulated development) shall be regulated under this section. d c as E M U 2 r a 50 Packet Pg. 467 28.A.f CONSERVATION COLLIER PROPOSED 2024 TARGET PROTECTION AREAS Prepared for: The Conservation Collier Land Acquisition and Advisory Committee July 3, 2024 Packet Pg. 468 28.A.f Conservation Collier Cycle 12 Target Protection Mailing Areas (TPMA) TABLE OF CONTENTS # on Page 3 Overview Map Description Page # N/A 2024 Target Protection Mailing Areas 3 N/A Conservation Collier Preserves and Target Protection Mailing Areas Overview Map 4 N/A Conservation Collier Preserves and Target Protection Mailing Areas Overview Map by Commission District 5 1 Caracara Prairie Preserve 6 2 Pepper Ranch Preserve 8 3 Immokalee 10 4 Railhead Scrub Preserve 12 5 Rivers Road Preserve 14 6 Brewers Landing 16 7 Redroot Preserve 18 8 Panther Walk Preserve 20 9 Gordon River Greenway 22 10 Nancy Payton Preserve 24 11 North Belle Meade Preserve 26 12 I-75 & Everglades Blvd. 28 13 Dr. Robert H. Gore III Preserve 30 14 Bayshore Area 32 15 Rattlesnake Hammock Preserve 34 16 Shell Island Preserve 36 17 Mcllvane Marsh Preserve 38 18 Marco Island 40 Supplement 1- Selection Strategy 2024 Target Protection Area Parcel Selection Strategy 42 Conservation Collier Potential Acquisition Lands 2019 43 Distribution of CLIP Priority Natural Communities in Collier County 44 2024 Target Protection Mailing Area Priority Natural Communities Present 45 Packet Pg. 469 28.A.f 2024 Target Protection Mailing Areas (TPMA) # on Page 3 Overview Map Target Protection Mailing Area Parcels Acreage 2021 TPMA (Cycle 10) 2022 TPMA (Cycle 11) 2023 TPMA (Cycle 12) 14 Bayshore Area 3 71.6 YES YES YES 6 Brewers Landing 1 2.7 No No No 1 Caracara Prairie 7 240.4 YES YES YES 13 Dr. Robert H. Gore III Preserve 84 190.4 YES YES YES 9 Gordon River 5 4.3 YES YES YES 12 1-75 & Everglades 182 551.3 No No YES 3 Immokalee 6 1,610.4 No No YES 18 Marco Island 36 18.8 No YES YES 17 Mcllvane Marsh 7 365.5 YES YES YES 10 Nancy Payton 39 274.9 YES YES YES 11 North Belle Meade Preserve 34 262.1 No YES No 8 Panther Walk 35 72.9 YES YES YES 2 Pepper Ranch 3 74.4 YES YES YES 4 Railhead Scrub Preserve 2 18.8 YES YES 15 Rattlesnake Hammock Preserve 1 4.2 YES YES YES 7 Redroot Preserve 2 24.0 No No YES 5 Rivers Road Preserve 22 89.4 YES YES YES 16 Shell Island Preserve 5 144.9 YES YES YES TOTAL 474 4,021.0 c a� E U Q Page 3 of 45 Packet Pg. 470 Q Oo N E AJOSinpV uoi;isinboV pue- : OZV6Z) VZOZ-E-L OVV-100 - sb'Wdl pasodoad tiZOZ '8'S :;uGwLj3ejjv a) j 13{ o v L7 m Q) N o � a c� a n i i AL n II n��i Illillnl� .. �I II IIINII�111lnlll n�llll��nl�l �I Il !�! � m� I�ln� MM i � • i All 1 ,M. P. III _ L ~� j ffi lmI w Air, Al @IMF frr. T r1''F N Q a q {• Mi Q ■= O NZ6 2N y N h [+ ' r (�] w ¢ d C d N O Q N d L ❑ o p� 0. ❑ -0 - 1 l� Sti i 1 � � � � ❑ � J [� lV j � � �] -" � Y C ca � (53 ' �� '` ' r G1 N ❑ N O Q' d N m � I _a O C Cn y N C •` ❑ C T ❑ L ❑ f T n 0,C L ca Q7 . - C -2 0 [5$ Z 0 Z L N (Si L ❑ (0 Q7 Ll a d' m ita o N� Ln(6 � r .. !S err O 0. u CD It N o N i(aosinpV uoi;isinboV pue-1 m a' ,F, u L pl 0 o � � m 0 (D� o Lo o Q) a 'E Ua E 0 Q co N 0 ca •� � N 00 a� a, 0 L •N N_ •E E N u Q� OZV6Z) tiZOZ-£-L OVV-130 - SVWdl pasodoJd VZOZ '8'S :;uauayoeUV Z r N a r� aJ � I P L _ d V �a a t� 0 w � 2 PUB-1 OZV6Z) tiZOZ-E-L :DVV-100 - SVWdl pasodoad VZOZ '8'S .IuauayaePv61.7 M Q N 06 al Q O O +�+ N d U } O c0 'L a% CO M (1) � U) CO C a) CD CDO O U� i O �'� O Q_ N N H a- Q U Q a E a a- a- [� V Z U) 0 Uj,1" iN4rr1 Sw' � 4 � 45 9wy - C ROM n _ Z.T. Jam► 1 Yh � •L � 1 Zvi � ��..,.__ � • ¢ s U _ ZA� _ .. U - - - " Q x ` Jsi 4.:.. O tiT 1- - J f �j • Cq J `l LU LO t r 5 C: ° I Q 06 N u PUB-1 OZV6Z) i I I I tiZOZ-E-L :DVV-100 - SVWdl pasodoJd VZOZ ITS :IUGW43eI}y C: < < L� co U-a ° ❑ Q O r -` COO Z .. .,r LL- ® hl 0 z a %. 00 [7tlaNl303 HOW . 06 dOln N34flIHM -C") LO 0 r- N (0 d Q 06 N 70 O O O Qi (a U U) U N co c Co Q C nO a� �/�O L L L PUB- OZV6Z) tiZOZ-E-L :DVV-100 - SVWdl pasodoad VZOZ ITS :IUGW43L'I}y N j -� Q O N Q O U co U m Q M Q - i cA N N .O — O a)0 oa UU O UQ LLJ 1 A ; - , •� (N CO .0 a O O O a 0 z M N as llVH ... u 31 21071AVi as WUV=l aa03=IVmi Z � 2131 SNlddll � w �C to U M a. Q Q x O 0 ao N 0 ' N MW U) N 0 00 m m a PUB-1 OZV6Z) tiZOZ-E-L :DVV-100 - SVWdl pasodOJd VZOZ ITS :luaw43B V q'i2ao 06 N < O a J J CO:j M: co � a Q J Q] U}} LLLn _ ,� < d Y N {`? :�- 02d IIVH o LL_ iK 2i cei U7 � � m W O o al Lu "n r W r 4WD LLJ z dd J = O a- 4� ff] � Q J it J u} Q Y a LO O O 0) (B d i i i i PUB-1 OZV6Z) tiZOZ-£-L :DVV-10: - SVWdl pasodoad VZOZ '8'S :IU9W43BPV Q N 06 N U co 'L _ M �0 � M � C6 •L •L •L N N �0 0 O 0)0 0 a. 0 oa UQ a a�a a [� vzc°� 0 00 u v) '. az1 31,11810 . 3a` HE) 33MdnaIL CN U J _ F Rre x N < �tO, ; 4 tom• 711 YYYk F co AS 1„s c si' N co (Q r r V cooOMO y s� p G w EL i o w o w `® °Q '3^m w CD N ram' O aAl9 Q 06 N < c.� PUB-1 OZt,6Z) a?m-4�� Lp•R :I �U)°p cR C3 � WU u] a lk tiZOZ-£-L OVV-100 - SVVUdl pasodoJd VZOZ •8.5 :luau. 43BPV p <ddd d CIO co U) J J J ( _J c a ❑ = T= T D D ❑ CM� 7 7 7F� 0 o D 2 a CE ¢ <� .�.¢<<¢.- 0. N 0003 m . cc _ 30t UO 3AMdria U x J - < .•,' . ❑T i Q S Vf J a D EL u � Q a OL V � Of O O < Q I 'w y z I w V — LU d to CA-19 MNVdaIV — _mik - O 06 C*4 V) _0 0 0 m LL W C: n C) _0 > U) =3 m U) 0 M m n 75; cq 00 PUB-1 OZt,6Z) I I I VZOZ-C-L OVV-133 SVWdl posodOJd VZOZ 'B'S :IUGW1VL'UV a- a- CN M U) ch cn a) C,4LLL CD 0 0 0 a) af- E .0 0).0 0 iE L- L- c,j L) 0 L) a. L a_ a_ E 0 z Uo Ir "44$ L -T GOBS N-1 INISNo-) sFRES OT, TWAYA� LU 0 U) NI mnsoi LU) ui CR At LU z w ILL 0: Lu U) w 0 z = �o LU lo VSOWIW z (in) SAIJVW iNIVS 13 N31ju fo M--] PUB- OZV6Z) tiZOZ-E-L :DVV-100 - SVWdl pasodOJd VZOZ EFS :IuauayaePv c Q Cu N Q o U) a a H ( 0 .� M V V a CLL C) C? UU .O a_ UFE = N OAP 5� G CD � 0 y y co Z LL NIINISaOO U) �p� d cc N J �yo� Q GO >Q FRESCOTT WAY r U C m J Q W � � n v`Ov� O IL :3 (L � N U AVM 0I10218 N U) N o � U c ,m � r VJ w (^�1 Wco Q qJ CY Z �/ ry W tY Z OR z BULL RUN w Lb h U a j F V CO) J (U/) 2' LLI co W a w d �y0� a0 M O� O U 1� t/SOWIW Q p GOP d Q � 1� SA2lt/W 1NIb�S w �� y 2z �`�� U a m 1 y Ln Q d Q UN (PRPOCOvgOR U N R TAMIAMI TRL N U GRgy FOX d U m D a a o a o a 06 C*4 LL Qi r Q) cu cu 0 U) 0 > 7> 00 co a) C\l C14 I I I I PUB-1 0ZV6Z) VZOZ-C-LOW-100 - SVWdi posodOJd VZOVES :luGW43L'llV CN > a) a) 0 0 co m C14 a_ C) ?- o L I •r r CU a0 0) 0 C14 C14 a) m CD N 0 0 0 a. C) qNT E C\j M HUI A ca z z z MOULDER DR IS SCINVH t'j, I . t,-;4 I tL RIVERS RD i A N, ,r C; C-4 LO C) =Z--- Q 06 N O N r a3 a] to a) L N n" V} �Ly W pus-1 : OZt,6Z) VZOZ-£-L OVV-133 - SVWdl posodoJd VZOZ 'B'S :IUGWLI3L'UV 'tl] < D m z (wr a IL 0LD ❑ a Q 0 LL. U- f1 u < a i I mow ........ .............. ................. .... .. ..... . .......... .... .. .. m ........................... ... ........ .... .... ........... .. .. __.. ... __ .....__.. _.. _...__.. __.. __.. __..._._. ... ................................ ......... ... .. .. MO U LOF-R DR .rn ....RLjRa ku :::.:::.... ................... KRAPE RD ::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ... A _. .0 N I --- — XISM i i ------------ ............................................................ .... O . Q. ............ ........................................................... .......----.......-..__........__..__.. ::� ....................,: u . :a .. .......................,......................,............. .......... ....................... o ...... -•- --•-••---•- �, r MEW 4— LO 0 LO 0 0) M a PUB-1 OZV6Z) tiZOZ-E-L :DVV-100 - SVWdl pasodOJd VZOZ •8•S :IUGW1 L'IIV Q � N Q L p Q N mch c= m L a p � U U U Q i E i a E 0 0zu v t:. .»,.Y d .Slr r Lu Vithi J LO a 0- i N .r N •• _ N (]nl9 NOSIIM N 11 A. 3 Q U 3 w z i > 73 y w # 'T'fi wrm l-) - CV C) - CD M co a a PUB-1 OZV6Z) tiZOZ-E-L :DVV-100 - SVWdl pasodoad VZOZ EFS :IuauayaePv Q � i co N Q O a M N La O he L 2 N UU ,�QQui a N w w z z � w > 'a a � x F O N Q LO C N c O n W i N 0AI8 NOSIIM z z � 0) w a C: � � v C cn (z J N N L m O Q i i i PUB-1 OZt,6Z) tiZOZ-£-L :DVV-10: - SVWdl pasodoad VZOZ '8'S :lU9W43BPV N C a C Q a) .0 +�+ N H UQ ma ,0 m N N� C:= c`� a o0).o a� 0 N c�� Q a E a�a /At ry € LO M ',y r 0 LU Qom, w 75 J 16s. $ cC fF l , r e'. N ab A2!` ni3N S_, re cam" 'ti Al _ N O LO 00 a NO SPE LO O 00 N cn m a_ a 06 N C a n Q) N U) a� n O v pus- OZV6Z) VZOZ-£-L OVV-133 - SVWdl posodoJd t ZOZ '8'S :lUGW1 L4lV 2 z Q .LD l N LU CL I - N au AsvntaNros/Zz — n v ch W to 00 a m a 299 ti 00 Cb a a� Y V a 0 0 N c6 a- Q 06 N CD C ��v++ 'V CL a] N rn a) L- CL v c IL cv PUB-1 OZV6Z) c > } C: co a im �4yy4 ! icy C L tiZOZ-E-L :DVV-100 - SVWdl pasodoJd VZOZ ITS :lUGW43el}y f W Q D d d 1 i L CO U) CDC r r. �7 ' �r, < < < C� w C-) U) J its X nt z w x x i x x z cl w w w w�+ rL rx- r °z = r I I ...F� MOW z k�• o z a NI dlHSa 13RJ-4 a I r �C) 4- LO 0 N N 0) m 0- PUB-1 OZV6Z) tiZOZ-E-L :DVV-100 - SVWdl pasodoad VZOZ '8'S :1uauay3ePv W: CID Q N (D _ > Q a) o v°', .0- co Lm ^ r CO U ?-a Lo N CO N C= C a)CL 0 cm 0 0 d O CDa U U U Qa. a s f� n La 1 0Zu A I U LO Q j s Ul R� C�R d 1 � ` , o Ho ' `V� .a v , NT d 400MT i„ � , r r 21� � � '' ,t,� a?��- ..ztr.. 5• � r� N7 NBAIN NOCINOJ i .` . . }•� L 0 •O 70 . m �r o; Uw" Q 14� N1SH1S6 /VI ', �^ j '� ill • �N��I 0 Y W Lu Wcn _ Y L y ~ a «" is '�iX O --- � - N ON )1MdNd-31131a009LO it N 1S HM O m< a# Z 2 W N cu • t ST N5 v 4 r. � H PUB-1 OZV6Z) tiZOZ-E-L :DVV-100 - SVWdl pasodoJd VZOZ EFS :IuauayaePv Q as c a) N < c a) n he s°c° .�-c c. uuZ-aa0�w0� cl� 0� o N - CD a7 � O - N d r) m C V Q) C C 0 , ' _0 `. � � w J [L -z 1;TH5TN LL LL LL as fiHlaa31H LL U7 m � I 0 z w - - - — ' Ln M w o � N C.) U moo pUe- OZt,6Z) tiZOZ-£-L :DVV-10: - SVWdl posodOJd VZOZ '8'S :Iu9wLl3elly r q CIA > N (n o o >+ y a o 2 0ZZ - d -0 a) RL = m Ci cn N N� tea- mLn �c a � oa,o a 0 oN C\l UU mQ UQ a a�a J m O p C) Z C) U � A F�-I �� ^ `� �� :t ➢ kY H ; � ➢;� W fir, Lu i °SQ_ a t #.�•aa• a.� �r•0 Jms is CV IV 'fit s ,�, 1 ,� � � � ➢ i � �+ .� _ to O �� l _ ' �{, � i- € �`I , � SCE. � �..,r � ;•r � . �aa aN�ad� /3\ Yf yl,r�-.yl� 1 I. �e•re4K"7'+y yr. 1.1is — }, f r N (a � S qP � ➢mac-::. N A � L • N� Ej) N 0 S (alU I 8 1 A Fn cu Lo c: co 'Abaft LO KIM ILWOO �cMcMIN (a ^`d 0 of as nods 3ma as ayes ama UY-,,. �4'��y l(') ,� - (q 1 i vi ➢n wr",S�R,s w ➢n �, ,, N LU > v <0 pus-1 : OZt,6Z) VZOZ-£-L OVV-133 - sVWdl posodoJd t ZOZ '8'S :lUGWLl3L4lV a 1pr -OW 1 N < D e0 j 0 [G Q} C. 2 _ C EL < d ❑ '2 (n Q Q d LL L.L N V and af d w do DR A uu a a ui a MS 13 OHEZ LU 7 Q w z u�] Y ❑a 0NV-laVO Nl ONOSON113 l� N73A as Niaoa' . . 1>ass�3a�❑ k wW. l J ' '0 �, IN � x, Zia 39vs W-10 � 4 �i _W PUBS : OZt,6Z) tiZOZ-£-L :DVV-10: - SVWdl pasodoad VZOZ EFS :Iuauauaelly M 06 L N Q O U) Q O N a N C= L C p p co d O Oo c� UU o cn � UQ a a� m 0 0 m Z U U U_ U 1 N , 4 j O t t � m 5(D C IMOO!, Mali e Z � t Y xi, ® 1 ►`� U ,LOyr L a _LO N .13 PUB-1 OZV6Z) tiZOZ-E-L :DVV-100 - SVWdl pasodoJd tiZOZ '8'S :IuauayaePv a] Q L O U) Q� N W — a) � O� U) I I C) C) U N L C O I 2 2 U oN UU E E O U�) Q EE 'V N d O 75 1� ILI zLNEE X1 c a � k� 1-1 a 06 N 0 0 H U U) W 0 0 t� H \� ^1 / W m N U �L T W }' � cY? LO LO N c6 U Q N co N U C6 n pus- OZt'6Z) VZOZ-£-L OVV-133 - SVWdl posodOJd VZOZ 'B'S :IUGW1 L'U IV a Q ! N C� _0 } O 0- V j U Q '� 4w N N N 2 U) N a a� N NH 00 m a a UZUDO LLl LLl W i .., W ws <.� k - fn CO (n < 3 cn W "'ct W W W W- Ii A£�. z o N N c c° W ro c m l LLI wLLI a a a a,� o x Z x M M 0 CM S aura SMV-10b3n3 w LU S PUB-1 OZV6Z) tiZOZ-E-L :DVV-100 - SVWdl pasodoJd VZOZ EFS :IuauayaePv 06 N _ 0 > < <� m U ca, no'-❑ Of m— r w hl co I W d 4 d _ 0 } m C" qL W ui u L J W M 0) W 4 F V� SS ❑AIS i1y W W � d 7 w to W T H ?t LU Q - N LO O K x �� pUe- OZt,6Z) tiZOZ-£-L :DVV-10: - SVWdl pasodoJd VZOZ EFS :Iuauauaelly o Q N N O / > N N tq N m a N N H 0 O O m- a . U Z U a� 0 z a� L Co Q� ^L n f o �L 0 fL �L V 2p N0 cm L.L � N QL U Q Q p co N U i Ca � O > O a� z O PUB-1 OZV6Z) tiZOZ-E-L :DVV-100 - SVWdl pasodoad VZOZ '8'S :IuauayaePv 00 ¢ v a) 06 N - a Q _ � J < ++ CL (D fn U 0 J he cm r # a. C) ❑ ❑ cn r—_ d W LL _ tom! i ILN O O - 0 0 a C 3 4 I T I{I{ UI 1i S (DA79 O1O5�0 L I � �i ��• w QJ w _ = ua w N a w LO Lli M � N 0) � f6 Q 06 N PUB-1 OZV6Z) tiZOZ-E-L :DVV-100 - SVWdl pasodoJd VZOZ '8'S :IUGW43eI}y N Q a) O N a_ w L C, ? 0 N M N M C6 N� o�' a L �oa,00 L L 0 CD a- 0 00 [� 0 Z u t � � } C i �M• i t a ne Q 06 N 0) 0 Q7 L O V) M m PUB-1 OZV6Z) tiZOZ-E-L :DVV-100 - SVWdl pasodoad VZOZ ITS :IUGW43eI}y H U- •��y J V N a �0 3�14HS11'd0 ' C% L W } d J i ti 0 C LO 0 M Cl) f6 a PUB-1 OZt,6Z) VZOZ-£-L OVV-133 - SVWdl posodOJd VZOZ 'B'S :IUGWLI3L'UV q 06 > > f N Q O O .O N I H .L 0 CO c - o O o c O a � ° o •° N a NH �� a a •a' a�a a_ E Mzu000 cn lOS3ab TL a� LL LL \ � aU AVMA�iS N U Y h U () •�' > Q Q W " NAPLES HERIE ORLU O L W Y Y 7 E a a � U° Y W G U fn z NI AdNVS Q Q F } w Y �_! rf Q J F O W W 4'k i� OAlB 13Sf1S Np Q Q a--• t ;E F 0 z J _ - N r r� cc `v L W J O LU LU G (Ury 0 BEN z w < a a' 1 �,, 1CO �r' O) , 0� Nl N3003HS (6Al Q U•� �ID�5� e' �'> ��ej r 0� o QM'll/iyn wa � � . U � � .. U •��yaF } 4^'TZ i'r-. Z Q O G W LU x.-_.. = z N a s,. 08 NVG k1Nno } J 0: t ? a } QLU ' jlt ' aQ 37713S21bW � 211 OOMN3� �J ,; k U B �J� �0� 1 LO €. �12113J`d1R13H co . tEl-L OR 4 r 8 f ,� c snom1J A711(]b'O91d.. ✓ rESJra s '��.4� ` r � �QO�� .,�,., I �- 0 �SANREMOCIR„'1 i t 21C] A218bW OAlB 31NIOd NM021O PUB-1 OZV6Z) tiZOZ-E-L :DVV-100 - SVWdl pasodoad VZOZ EYS :lUGW1 ael}y Q O 06 C3 N < C � � I o U3 u3 U) l C � ,� ¢ of . WE N� J r I C n a u7 Cli 0 aLL _ u3 = X W x CD u7 LL U3 N O LO a m a 0 LO M N 0) (6 a- Q 06 N L Ccu G co U) >� (a U) Co 2 L 70 L- C: .O IT..L CO � N U Q M _� 7 i co 0- pus- OZV6Z) tiZOZ-E-L :DVV-100 - SVWdl pasodoad VZOZ ITS :IUGW43eI}y �. (D N_ > Q .0 co L co 'i 1+ M U �a O •r C N N c= c a) a 2 cm p 0 oa UU UQ E a. a!a J O n ' C) Z C) NIAaa3alnw All +JQg m W "O G W W V eT V' W N LIJ W * W w��j al�3JiVla00M; w� r =r ' 1� 3JVRRIV� � i-. :a, o Nl 3A00 ) SVWOHIlINIVS'dO 3lSl 7bN1p21b0J.- �Qy S "S NOOw- � z;+- a r 1� NVRIOO = 1S SORT OHOO - Fes, e. W U % \ ? - as SVNIIVS 13 lORIVH� i O � OAlB 21311100 i _ Lq C) Z LO O M N Q 06 N PUB-1 OZV6Z) tiZOZ-E-L :DVV-100 - SVWdl pasodoad VZOZ ITS :IUGW43eI}y 2 n i z z ❑ ❑ LL 00 00 5ELCo C) C3 2i L a W W ® o N a iL W U ? Nl A�la3H�f1W W 4 W O Ct (n4O0, W W W Z L7 ui 7 [} LU w aid ElSIVIOOpAh w 0 3AO0 7bNr ��y� svhoD u iNIVS �0 3lsl i � 5� cola N►f1214D IS SDIb CH30 e� b❑ SV NI-Ivs a O 4 a � 13loluvH3 a nn')e H311103 z� s F'- o � U - r _GE V7 Q 06 N Lj cn N O L O O L.L N S- U U) 'L i i co 7 N +- c6 U) U 7 m G p O �L In In CO M N L U a ti U L n I I PUB- 0ZV6Z) tiZOZ-E-L :DVV-100 - SVWdl posodOJd VZOZ ES :lUGW43L'l}y N > -� r L Q N Q O ate+ N N C C p p p O N a U U O U Q a 62 E ❑ LLJ I VZV w Oa HDNV"N olmy F 0 ,% Wm co i 0 0 N CURCIE RD - N MIR .r, L() O 00 M lv Q 06 N 14J� 1 V CL- ai En a) CL Ln L A� W a. PUB-1 OZV6Z) tiZOZ-E-L :DVV-100 - SVWdl pasodoad VZOZ ITS :IUGW43eI}y < car, m 0 ( U �-� zwU) IL oaa L DD� 1 C)C �LD=2�� z �Z)L C> 0 0 LL LL LL o a = :D a- (0 A- rV .............. f .... - <:: ::_- z :::.....,:....._...:......._.. 0 CURCIE RO as WHVA sl xis - is �D a a m a. LL_ a :;. a� a Z J ll�,Iaa moi4va`olnv d C to 0 LO a a LO 0 rn Cl) N 0) f6 D_ 4- pus- OZt,6Z) VZOZ-£-L OVV-133 - SVWdl posodOJd VZOZ 'B'S :IUGWLI3L'UV Q (D 06 > N Q O O O > V.,N a a c� ^' O N Nc C CU O O 00 O CD Oa UU aQ UQ a aa a ® I uZ0o � �Q U O L r r \ E �L co 70 - (a }, co O (u �� ►� n _ co K/ A"-, ! i "�� _• . v�i '. w I i Z 28.A.f 2024 Target Protection Mailing Area Parcel Selection Strategy The goal of the Conservation Collier Program is to protect and conserve the remaining greenspaces within Collier County. Several factors limit how much land can be acquired; therefore, the program must selectively target the most valuable of these remaining lands. The Conservation Collier Implementation Ordinance identifies eight initial criteria to evaluate parcels for acquisition. The most limiting criterion among remaining available parcels is the presence of lands identified as Priority 1, 2, 3, or bythe Critical Lands and Water Identification Project (CLIP). The CLIP is a collection of spatial data that identify priorities for a broad range of natural resources in Florida. The CLIP Priority Natural Communities layer was developed by the Florida Natural Areas Inventory using the Florida Cooperative Land Cover System for the Florida Forever Conservation and Recreation Land Acquisition Program. Florida Forever uses this layer, among others, to create a statewide blueprint for conserving natural resources. Natural communities within this layer are prioritized using a combination of their global conservation status rank and their landscape context. The priority natural communities identified within Collier County by this layer are listed in Table 1. In addition to these communities, the layer prioritizes pine flatwoods in our region. Undeveloped parcels within the potential acquisition lands were considered for acquisition based primarily on whether they contained priority natural communities, but also if they enhanced current conservation lands, were at risk of development, were "large", or were currently listed for sale (Figures 1 & 2). The results are summarized in Table 2. Table 1. Collier County CLIP Priority Natural Communities and Their Priorities Habitat CLIP Priority Natural Community Priority Scrub Scrub 1 Scrubby Flatwoods Scrub 1 Beach Dune Coastal Uplands 1 Coastal Berm Coastal Uplands 1 Coastal Strand Coastal Uplands 1 Maritime Hammock Coastal Uplands 1 Shell Mound Coastal Uplands 1 Mesic Hammock Upland Hardwood Forest 1-2 Pine Flatwoods Pine Flatwoods 2-4 Mesic Flatwoods Pine Flatwoods 2-4 Hydric Pine Flatwoods Pine Flatwoods 2-4 Salt Marsh Coastal Wetlands 2-4 Mangrove Swamp Coastal Wetlands 2-4 Page 42 of 45 1 Packet Pg. 509 28.A.f Figure 1. Conservation Collier Potential Acquisition Lands 2019 Figure C-1. DRAFT Conservation Collier Potential Acquisition Lands 'r Legend - Conservation Collier Preserves - Other Preserve Areas Potential Acquisition Lands ` Collier County Boundary sum Major Roads Land Use Designations Conservation r - North Golden Gate Estates Urban +4 8 , -•; = 4 - I Agriculturah f Rural Rural Fringe Mixed Use District = Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay s. Area of Critical State Concern '�i. `. J` I �a �4' r .1 - rrwwArenee sraaao sane a crPues &aoa T�`I'i,E �� aaese9vE '-1'•iJ .' C/,aF•POrNe�.T�N L!!�ll�ry"'�'_•"+PS l ,....,. Map fs a draft document and shmld not he used for decision making purposes. Source: CclNer County C—Mahon Collier. 10-7-2019. Conservation ColrierfiMapahkequisiNon PlanMk,,RingM.pAndShapefilesf10-7-18/P6orityAreas10.7-19 Q 5 14 Miles I I I Iq N O N M I, - IL a� N O tZ O L IL N O N m 6 r-� C N E t V R r-r Q Page 43 of 45 1 Packet Pg. 510 Figure 2. Distribution of CLIP Priority Natural Communities in Collier County 28.A.f CLIP4 Priority Natural Communities in Collier County 0 25 50 Miles CAS ty m wi Q Page 44 of 45 1 Packet Pg. 511 28.A.f Table 2. 2024 Target Protection Mailing Areas Target Protection Mailing Area Parcels Acreage Priority Natural Communities Present Bayshore Area 3 71.6 Hydric Pine Flatwoods, Salt Marsh Brewers Landing 1 2.7 None Caracara Prairie Preserve 7 240.4 Mesic Flatwoods Dr. Robert H. Gore III Preserve 84 190.4 None Gordon River Greenway 5 4.3 Mangrove Swamp 1-75 & Everglades Blvd. 182 551.3 Mesic Flatwoods, Hydric Pine Flatwoods Immokalee 6 1,610.4 Mesic Flatwoods Marco Island 36 18.8 Scrub, Maritime Hammock* Mcllvane Marsh Preserve 7 365.5 Hydric Pine Flatwoods, Salt Marsh, Mangrove Swamp Nancy Payton Preserve 39 274.9 Mesic Flatwoods, Hydric Pine Flatwoods North Belle Meade Preserve 34 262.1 Mesic Flatwoods, Hydric Pine Flatwoods Panther Walk Preserve 35 72.9 Mesic Flatwoods, Hydric Pine Flatwoods Pepper Ranch Preserve 3 74.4 Mesic Flatwoods, Hydric Pine Flatwoods Railhead Scrub Preserve 2 18.8 Hydric Pine Flatwoods, Scrub Rattlesnake Hammock Preserve 1 4.2 Hydric Pine Flatwoods Redroot Preserve 2 24.0 Mesic Flatwoods Rivers Road Preserve 22 89.4 Hydric Pine Flatwoods Shell Island Preserve 5 144.9 Salt Marsh Total 474 4,021.0 * Not identified by layer but presumed present ca Wi Q Page 45 of 45 1 Packet Pg. 512 Za A y re— . b' 5: - Vy J _ �'✓ - � �. y. rya - 1 28.A.g Conservation Collier Brewer's Landing Preserve Interim Land Management Plan Table of Contents Land Management Plan Executive Summary........................................................................ 4 ParcelDescription................................................................................................................. 6 1. Location.............................................................................................................................. 6 1.1. Description................................................................................................................... 6 Figure 1.1.1. Overview map of Brewer's Landing Preserve and surrounding conservation areas............................................................................................................................... 7 Figure 1.1.2. 2022 Aerial close-up................................................................................... 8 2. Physiography...................................................................................................................... 9 2.1. Description................................................................................................................... 9 Figure 2.1.1. Topographical Map (LIDAR)......................................................................10 Figure 2.1.2. Aquifer Map (CLIP4 Aquifer Priority Map and Wellfield Protection Zones) .11 Figure 2.1.3. Hydric Soils Map (Collier County Soils Survey)..........................................12 3. Historical Land Use...........................................................................................................13 3.1. Description.................................................................................................................13 0 Q Photoset 3.1.1. Historical Aerial Imagery ........................................................................13 4. Adjacent Land Use............................................................................................................15 CU J 4.1. Description..................................................................................................................15 0 5. Acquisition and Expansion.................................................................................................15 a� 5.1. Acquisition Description................................................................................................15 a 5.2. Potential Preserve Expansion.....................................................................................15 a� Management.........................................................................................................................15 a 6. Vegetation Management....................................................................................................15 6.1. Current Vegetative Community Conditions..................................................................15 Figure 6.1.1. Cooperative Land Cover Classification Map..............................................17 J N Table 6.1.2. Threatened and Endangered Plant Species Table......................................18 L d L 6.1.3. Vegetation Management Concerns.......................................................................18 00 U 6.2. Desired Future Conditions...........................................................................................18 L6 6.3. Management Tools.....................................................................................................18 r E 6.3.1. Invasive Plant Removal........................................................................................18 6.3.2. Native Plant Restoration.......................................................................................18 r 6.3.3. Hydrological Restoration.......................................................................................18 6.4. Partnership Opportunities............................................................................................19 2 Packet Pg. 514 28.A.g Conservation Collier Brewer's Landing Preserve Interim Land Management Plan 7. Wildlife Management.........................................................................................................19 7.1. Current Wildlife Community Conditions.......................................................................19 Table 7.1.1. Observed Wildlife Species Table .................. Error! Bookmark not defined. Table 7.1.2. Potential Threatened and Endangered Species Table................................19 7.1.2. Wildlife Management Concerns............................................................................19 N 40 N 7.2. Desired Future Conditions...........................................................................................20 li 21 7.3. Management Tools.....................................................................................................20 7 7.3.1. Habitat Improvements...........................................................................................20 7.3.2. Connectivity..........................................................................................................20 E Figure 7.3.2. — Florida Panther Telemetry Locations......................................................21 0 U L 7.3.4. Monitoring.............................................................................................................22 0 7.4. Partnership Opportunities............................................................................................22 Q 8. Recreation Management...................................................................................................22 0 8.1. Current Recreational Opportunity Conditions..............................................................22 Ln Figure 8.1.1. — CREW Bird Rookery Swamp Trail..........................................................23 a Q 9. Preserve Safety and Security Management.......................................................................24 9.1. Current/Predicted Human Conflict Conditions.............................................................24 CU 9.2. Desired Future Conditions...........................................................................................24 0 N a� N 9.3. Management Tools.....................................................................................................24 a 9.3.1. Site Security Improvements..................................................................................24 9.4. Partnership Opportunities............................................................................................24 N 10. Additional Resource Use Management............................................................................24 a� a 10.1. Current Additional Resource Use Conditions............................................................24 a, S 11. Budget.............................................................................................................................24 J Table 11.1. Projected Expenditures Table......................................................................24 12. Appendix.........................................................................................................................25 a� Table 12.1. Legal Description.........................................................................................25 m v 12.2. Public Meeting Comments and Staff Responses...................................................25 r c m E 0 r r Q 3 Packet Pg. 515 Conservation Collier Brewer's Landing Preserve Interim Land Management Plan 28.A.g Land Management Plan Executive Summary Lead Agency: Conservation Collier, Development Review Division, Growth Management Community Development Department, Collier County Properties included in this Plan: The Brewer's Landing Preserve lands consist of 4 parcels located within Section 10, Township 48, and Range 27 in Collier County, Florida. Full legal descriptions are provided in the appendix (Table 12.2). Total Acreage: 14.78 Management Responsibilities: Collier County Conservation Collier program staff Designated Land Use: Conservation Unique Features: Brewer's Landing Preserve is an excellent example of cypress and mixed scrub -shrub wetland forest plant communities and contains many mature pop ash and cypress trees and provides an important stopover location for migrating birds. Desired Future Conditions: Vegetation: A preserve with high quality cypress/mixed scrub -shrub wetland forest and less than 10% infestation of non-native species. Wildlife: A preserve with the appropriate vegetative communities, resource use, and connectivity to support wildlife species native to that habitat. Recreation: This preserve is not compatible with public recreation. Preserve Safety and Security: A preserve free of littering, dumping, illicit activities, neighbor disturbances, unauthorized vehicles, and after-hours trespass. Public Involvement As part of the Interim Land Management Plan drafting process, a public meeting will be held in **** 2024, to gather input from members of the public and preserve stakeholders. 0 Packet Pg. 516 Conservation Collier Brewer's Landing Preserve Interim Land Management Plan 28.A.g Introduction The 14.78-acre preserve was approved for acquisition by the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) on September 26, 2023. The Brewer's Landing Preserve is a nature preserve located in the North Golden Gate Estates (NGGE) Unit 53. It is largely comprised of mixed scrub -shrub and cypress wetlands as identified by the Cooperative Land Cover Classification System. The preserve is designated as resource protection and will remain closed to the public, as it supports one of the larger swallow-tailed kite roosts in Collier County. The County holds fee simple title. The Conservation Collier Program manages this parcel under authority granted by the Conservation Collier Ordinance 2002-63, as amended (available from www.municode.com). Management activities allowed are those necessary to preserve and maintain this environmentally sensitive land for the benefit of present and future generations. Conservation Collier: Land Acquisition Program and Management Authority The Conservation Collier program was originally approved by voters in November 2002 and subsequently confirmed in the November 2006 and 2020 ballot referendums. Both voter - approved referendums enable the program to acquire environmentally sensitive lands within Collier County, Florida (Ordinance 2002-63, as amended). Properties must support at least two of the following qualities to qualify for consideration: rare habitat, aquifer recharge, flood control, water quality protection, and listed species habitat. The BCC appointed the Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Advisory Committee (CCLAAC) to consider any selected or nominated properties that an owner has indicated a willingness to sell. The committee recommends property purchases for final approval by the BCC. Lands acquired with Conservation Collier funds are titled to "COLLIER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, by and through its Conservation Collier program." The BCC established the Conservation Collier Program to implement the program and to manage acquired lands. As such, Conservation Collier holds management authority for the Brewer's Landing Preserve. Purpose and Scope of Plan The purpose of the interim management plan is to provide long term management direction for the Brewer's Landing Preserve by identifying the desired future conditions of each element and the appropriate tools to achieve these conditions. This plan seeks to balance the various facets of natural resource conservation (listed species protection, habitat restoration, and invasive species management). This plan is divided into sections that include an introduction, parcel description, management element conditions, objectives, potential tools, and a projected budget. 5 Packet Pg. 517 Conservation Collier Brewer's Landing Preserve Interim Land Management Plan 28.A.g Parcel Description 1. Location 1.1. Description The Preserve is in the North Golden Gates Estates Unit 53 area of Collier County, FL in Section 8, Township 48, and Range 27. The Preserve is situated east of CREW Bird Rookery Swamp, along Wilson Blvd. N. (Figure 1.1.1). The Preserve is comprised of 4 parcels totaling 14.78 acres (Table 12.1). The preserve is bisected by the Corkscrew Canal. Lei Packet Pg. 518 Conservation Collier Brewer's Landing Preserve Interim Land Management Plan 28.A.g ONITA BEACH ❑ IMMOKALEE RD �} z 0 (7 z VANDERBILT BEACH RD F rL J m �,� w 494 ❑ OIL WELL RD a CD Cr W LU w ❑ J in 0 Q w JAP GOLDEN GATE BLVD h 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Miles - Preserve Boundary Conservation Collier Preserve Managed Conservation Area - Other Conservation Area l Co .o.T10N LLIER Zf Figure 1.1.1. Overview map of Brewer's Landing Preserve and surrounding conservation areas N r Q Packet Pg. 519 28.A.g Conservation Collier Brewer's Landing Preserve Interim Land Management Plan Miles Preserve Boundary Conservation Area Figure 1.1.2. 2022 Aerial close-up 0.25 CS]N ATION ON L Packet Pg. 520 Conservation Collier Brewer's Landing Preserve Interim Land Management Plan 28.A.g 2. Physiography 2.1. Description LIDAR and Surface Waters A Light Detection and Ranging (LIDAR) map provides information about the elevation of the Earth's surface. The topographical map of the Preserve (Figure 2.1.1) indicates surface features of lower elevation in deepening shades of blue. The preserve is an example of mixed scrub -shrub and cypress forest wetland plant communities where most, if not all, of the preserve experiences surface water ponding at some point during the year. Aquifer Recharge Potential The preserve is within a Priority 6 CLIP4 Aquifer Recharge designation and is not within a wellfield protection zone as designated by Collier County Utilities Golden Gate Wellfield (Figure 2.1.2). The preserve protects portions of the surficial aquifer that are sensitive to contamination. Soils There are two hydric soil types mapped within the preserve (Figure 2.1.3). Hydric soil present consists of holopaw and copeland depressional fine sands. A hydric soil is formed under conditions of saturation, flooding, or ponding long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper part (Federal Register, 1994). 9 Packet Pg. 521 28.A.g Conservation Collier Brewer's Landing Preserve Interim Land Management Plan Q Preserve Boundary LIDAR Value High : 104.644 Low :-4.11745 Figure 2.1.1. Topographical Map (LIDAR) 10 0.25 a CON YEit- ATION p� LLIER Ca ier Cou.ty Packet Pg. 522 Conservation Collier Brewer's Landing Preserve Interim Land Management Plan 28.A.g CJ 47TH AVE NW 47TH AVE NE z 0 m z 0 7J_ 7 45THAVE NW 45THAVE NE 0 0.5 Q Preserve Boundary Wellfield Protection Zones -.. - 1-YEAR 2-YEAR 5-YEAR = 20-Y EAR CLIP4 Aquifer Recharge _ Priority 1- HIGHEST ® Priority 2 - Priority 3 Priority 4 CO, ATION 0 Priority 5 Priority 6 L-n v C --L, Figure 2.1.2. Aquifer Map (CLIP4 Aquifer Priority Map and Wellfield Protection Zones) 11 Packet Pg. 523 28.A.g Conservation Collier Brewer's Landing Preserve Interim Land Management Plan Preserve Boundary Soil Type BOCA, RIVIERA, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM AND COPELAND FS, DEPRESSIONAL HOLOPAW FINE SAND Figure 2.1.3. Hydric Soils Map (Collier County Soils Survey) 12 0.25 CONS'I:f? ATION C LLILR CO 'F@Y CO..ty Packet Pg. 524 Conservation Collier Brewer's Landing Preserve Interim Land Management Plan 28.A.g 3. Historical Land Use 3.1. Description Aerial imagery (Photoset 3.1.1) dating back to 1969 shows significant alteration to nearby lands surrounding the preserve. Adjacent lands to the south and east are part of the North Golden Gates Estates area and are zoned for residential development. The Corkscrew Canal bisects the preserve into eastern and western halves. North and west of the preserve consists of a network of public and private conservation lands that comprise the 60,000-acre CREW (Corkscrew Regional Ecosystem Watershed) watershed; these CREW lands have generally remained intact, however development along the watershed periphery has increased as evidenced by the aerial imagery photoset. Photoset 3.1.1. Historical Aerial Imagery December 1985 13 Packet Pg. 525 A Crew Wildlife and Envepnmenlal Areag Autlubcn Corks S.vamp-5 t ry.ONLINIll SKz.., CREW Wildlife and Emi-onmental Area , - 7 �s t ��Li i _ I ,CRE •FLLn1IP�s ne 1,ads_ E - '"+ ` Ap. RdoK"rys T - ' � .Y {S rery Isla tl � r � 'T 02raeLee� sky. tr + �Pd IIxySuPer Marx I rr Tnsfi a a S a ¢ e p r •j 'y 1 { �T- 'ice q'�'rr IV -It 1 Af ,r y' Crew Wdtlli(e antl Enmronmenlal Area - •, `-' 2 :. Autluhon Corkscrew Swamp 5anclua�y.ONLINE TICi(EF5. -�F e CREW Wildlife and Environmental Area E iii¢'9Fa3n Tafs"'—' _E'ig f' � AI Nark I s, f —�, � _ .. 4 � Y !•. - ��omFa Bay C! bNsp`fas �y • -' - O:angetree F ra t., I _ Conservation Collier Brewer's Landing Preserve Interim Land Management Plan 28.A.g 4. Adjacent Land Use 4.1. Description Brewer's Landing Preserve is adjacent to South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) lands to the north and west. To the south and east, the preserve is bordered by Golden Gate Estates zoned property (Figure 1.1.1). 5. Acquisition and Expansion 5.1. Acquisition Description On September 26, 2023, the BCC approved the 4-parcel preserve for acquisition. 5.2. Potential Preserve Expansion Conservation Collier could target adjacent parcels for expansion. Management 6. Vegetation Management 6.1. Current Vegetative Community Conditions The following are the Cooperative Land Cover Classification System habitats identified. Non- native species are denoted with an *. Plant communities identified statewide under this cooperative land cover system partially rely on aerial imagery for plant community classification. Two plant communities have been identified across Brewer's Landing Preserve — these plant communities, along with general descriptions, can be found below. 2112 Mixed Scrub -Shrub Wetlands — Wetlands that are dominated by woody vegetation less than 20ft in height. This can occur in many situations, but in most cases involves transitional or disturbed communities on dried sites. Persistent examples of shrub wetlands include shrub bogs and willow swamps. Maior Canopy Components: Pop ash (Fraxinus caroliniana), Carolina willow (Salix caroliniana), buttonbush (Cephalanthus occidentalis), swamp dogwood (Corpus foemina) Maior Midstory Components: Brazilian pepper* (Schinus terebinthifolia) Maior Understory Components: swamp fern (Blechnum serrulatum), broomsedge (Andropogon spp.), sawgrass (Cladium jamaicense), pickerel weed (Pontederia cordata) 15 Packet Pg. 527 Conservation Collier Brewer's Landing Preserve Interim Land Management Plan 28.A.g 2211 Cypress - Dominated entirely by cypress, or these species important in the canopy; long hydroperiod. Major Canopy Components: Cypress (Taxodium distichum), cabbage palm (Saba) palmetto), cardinal airplant (Tillandsia fasciculata) Major Midstory Components: Pop ash (Fraxinus caroliniana), Brazilian pepper* (Schinus terebinthifolia), cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto), wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera), pond apple (Annona glabra), dahoon holly (Ilex cassine) Major Understory Components: Sawgrass (Cladium jamaicense), royal fern (Osmunda regalis), swamp fern (Blechnum serrulatum), crinum lily (Crinum americanum), peppervine (Ampelopsis arborea), false nettle (Boehmeria cylindrica), whitevine (Funastrum clausum), greenbriar (Smilax spp.), poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans), pickerel weed (Pontederia cordata) 16 Packet Pg. 528 28.A.g Conservation Collier Brewer's Landing Preserve Interim Land Management Plan Preserve Boundary Land Cover Canal - Cultural - Lacustrine F Cypress Mixed Hardwood Coniferous Swamps PF- Residential, Low Density Transportation Figure 6.1.1. Cooperative Land Cover Classification Map `VA 0.25 CON HWATION COLLIER Ca fev County Packet Pg. 529 Conservation Collier Brewer's Landing Preserve Interim Land Management Plan 28.A.g Table 6.1.2. Threatened and Endangered Plant Species Table Imperiled Plant Species Conservation Status Common Name Scientific Name State Federal Giant airplant Tillandsia utriculata Endangered Not Listed 6.1.3. Vegetation Management Concerns Maintaining the integrity of the kite roost site is the primary vegetation management concern on this preserve. It is unclear what vegetative factors influence the kite's utilization of this area Excessive growth of invasive vegetation threatens to negatively alter the character of the roost. Dramatic removal of the existing vegetation may negatively impact the roost as well. Old-world climbing fern may engulf the roost trees if left unchecked, Brazilian pepper shades out the understory and prevents recruitment of new roost trees. Various other non-native species compete for limited space with more desirable native vegetation. 6.2. Desired Future Conditions A preserve with a matrix of hydric plant communities, various age class roost trees, and a low infestation of invasive vegetation where practicable. 6.3. Management Tools 6.3.1. Invasive Plant Removal The preserve is sparsely infested with non-native, invasive plants, primarily Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolia) and Lygodium spp. In areas of the preserve with less canopy cover, Caesar weed (Urena lobata) and Peruvian primrose willow (Ludwigia peruviana) is also found. Herbicidal treatments will be the primary method used to control Category I and II invasive species. A limited herbicide application targeting Brazilian pepper occurred while under private ownership. Monitoring of the site shall consist of a walk-through by staff at semi-annual intervals. Conservation Collier shall be responsible for invasive plant treatment with tasks contracted out as deemed necessary. 6.3.2. Native Plant Restoration Native plantings will be appropriately utilized should management deem vegetative restoration necessary. 6.3.3. Hydrological Restoration The preserve sits on the edge of the Corkscrew Regional Ecosystem Watershed. Despite land alterations adjacent to the preserve (a canal bisects the preserve), it receives substantial inundation during the wet season which continues to promote the wetland plant communities W. Packet Pg. 530 Conservation Collier Brewer's Landing Preserve Interim Land Management Plan 28.A.g found across the preserve. Currently, no hydrological restoration projects are being considered. However, when situations arise where preserves could be part of a water management/restoration plan, Conservation Collier will support these plans if they don't negatively affect the preserve. 6.4. Partnership Opportunities Conservation Collier will pursue grants and funding assistance to cover the costs of vegetation maintenance. 7. Wildlife Management 7.1. Current Wildlife Community Conditions The preserve serves as one of the larger pre -migratory roost sites for the swallow-tailed kite. State and federally listed imperiled species observed utilizing the nearby Red Maple Swamp Preserve lands include the woodstork (Mycteria americana), little blue heron (Egretta caeru/ea), Florida panther (Puma concolor coryi), Florida bonneted bat (Eumops floridanus), and American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis). The seasonally inundated portions of the property provide habitat for a variety of imperiled wading birds, reptiles, and amphibians. Table 7.1.1. Potential Threatened and Endangered Species Table Type Common Name Species Protection Status Mammals Big Cypress fox squirrel Sciurus niger avicennia State Threatened Florida panther Puma concolor coryi Federally Endangered Florida bonneted bat Eumops floridanus Federally Endangered Birds Everglade's snail kite Rostrhamus sociabilis Federally plumbeus Endangered Crested caracara Caracara cheriway Federally Threatened Roseate spoonbill Platalea ajaja State Threatened Little blue heron Egretta caerulea State Threatened Tricolored heron Egretta tricolor State Threatened 7.1.2. Wildlife Management Concerns Due to the proximity to the CREW watershed, a 60,000-acre conglomerate of public and private land, the 14.78-acre preserve provides outstanding pre -migratory roosting habitat for the swallow- tailed kite before their annual migration to South America. Before this preserve was under county ownership, Richard Brewer bought the four parcels to guarantee protection of this important roost site. Since 2009, he and his colleagues have collected long term monitoring data regarding the abundance of swallow-tailed kites using this roost on an annual basis. An average of 210 birds/year have utilized the roost between 2009 and 2022. Of the kites tracked with GPS 19 Packet Pg. 531 Conservation Collier Brewer's Landing Preserve Interim Land Management Plan 28.A.g technology, most only utilized the roost for one night before their flight across the Gulf of Mexico. The roost and the surrounding CREW lands provide the kites with important ephemeral food sources that allow them to put on fat reserves before the dangerous migration ahead. GPS tracked kites from Louisiana, South Carolina, and Georgia have been documented using this roost as their final stopover before migrating across the Gulf of Mexico. 7.2. Desired Future Conditions A preserve with the appropriate vegetative communities, resource use, and connectivity to support wildlife species native to the habitat. 7.3. Management Tools 7.3.1. Habitat Improvements Treatment and removal of invasive plant species, primarily Brazilian pepper and Lygodium spp., will allow desired native species to recover. Effort will be made to keep these parcels as unchanged as possible due to their vital importance as a swallow-tailed kite, pre -migratory roost stie. 7.3.2. Connectivity Land to the south and east of the preserve is zoned for residential development. Lands to the west and north of the preserve consist of a network of conservation lands under permanent protection. These lands have a well -documented history of Florida panther (Puma concolor coryi) observations (Figure 7.3.2). Maintaining these connected lands allows for panthers to disperse north out of the Golden Gate Estates area without having to cross a multitude of highways. c Packet Pg. 532 28.A.g Conservation Collier Brewer's Landing Preserve Interim Land Management Plan Preserve Boundary Q Florida Panther Mortality Q Florida Panther Telemetry ® Black Bear Telemetry Figure 7.3.2. — Florida Panther Telemetry Locations 21 *IATIONR Cacy Packet Pg. 533 Conservation Collier Brewer's Landing Preserve Interim Land Management Plan 28.A.g 7.3.4. Monitoring It is presumed that several listed species, such as Florida bonneted bats, Big Cypress fox squirrels, and wood storks will be documented on the preserve. Conservation Collier staff will deploy trail cameras on the preserve to monitor wildlife utilization. In addition to listed species, Conservation Collier will continue to monitor the roost utilization of swallow-tailed kites at this preserve. 7.4. Partnership Opportunities Conservation Collier staff will continue to partner with the FWC, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), and Avian Research and Conservation Institute to monitor the kites. Grant funding may be available to enhance imperiled wildlife species habitat such as the USFWS Partners Grant. Staff will continue to partner with organizations such as the fStop Foundation for monitoring and outreach opportunities. Staff will seek opportunities to partner with researchers from higher education institutions to enhance conservation efforts of the wildlife species that utilize the preserve. 8. Recreation Management 8.1. Current Recreational Opportunity Conditions The preserve will remain closed to the public. The preserve is too small, too wet, and too sensitive to support public recreation of any kind. The head of the 12-mile-long Bird Rookery Swamp Trail (Figure 8.1.1) is only 2 miles from the preserve and tracks through comparable habitats. Even if they were appropriate, additional recreational features would be redundant on this preserve. PA Packet Pg. 534 Conservation Collier Brewer's Landing Preserve Interim Land Management Plan 28.A.g CF,EW Bird Reektry Swamp D,all � -R MMID � 295 �addy Hallow Mid. W, NWes, FL 34120 3 ZA 4f ir 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 Total Loup is 12 miles 1 REfuen oe Point drstanoes to A 1_25 ml les A to D 0.90miles a to 0 1.72mlles C to D 2.04 m1125 U to E ZODmiles E to a Ltthe r he F, uple Trad is3 1 rnik[UP WFlIrit PeriS�dffalisMal[[ �� s rraillnformadion Uap IIeT SCIE! ► ctiuitics TOUT Trall WsUht! Trail Reference Palnts Baking 12milEs Boardwalk W F Trailhead Parlong �8k�reskud+� A.d�l. � z P40C r ■■■ Gmiaeh�8 Trails maybesEesonallywet M81nTred IWeing — Bird RoakerySwamp Ocundary o o.s ani�r. Running PurpleTraI to CREW Flint Pen Strand Em4RkWai1937. Pori OR: collies asUrdle mIr.Ni i rlotrmh carer. Fobw tho Uwe No Tract pnnop Ms: Fockh a, pock Pt cue. ,rr+v..[AEriYrmvar� Figure 8.1.1. — CREW Bird Rookery Swamp Trail 23 a Packet Pg. 535 Conservation Collier Brewer's Landing Preserve Interim Land Management Plan 28.A.g 9. Preserve Safety and Security Management 9.1. Current/Predicted Human Conflict Conditions Like other secluded, public properties, the preserve may attract those wishing to trespass and engage in illicit activities. The preserve could also be utilized by people looking to poach game. With the network of conservation lands in the immediate area, FWC Law Enforcement does provide some security at the preserve. The presence of large and consistent groups of bird watchers may disturb the roost kites or force them to roost elsewhere. Disturbance during this time limits the kite's ability to build energy reserves and may compromise their impending migration. The roost is already known in the birdwatching community. To prevent this preserve from being "loved to death" it is critical to avoid further publicizing its presence. 9.2. Desired Future Conditions A preserve free of littering, dumping, illicit activities, neighbor disturbances, unauthorized vehicles, and after-hours trespass. 9.3. Management Tools 9.3.1. Site Security Improvements Staff will monitor for signs of trespass/illegal activities. Staff will collaborate with adjacent landowners and FWC Law Enforcement to address issues as they arise. Site security may be enhanced by increasing law enforcement presence in the area. 9.4. Partnership Opportunities Staff will collaborate with both the Collier County Sheriff's Office and FWC Law Enforcement to both prevent and respond to any criminal site security and safety issues as they present themselves. 10. Additional Resource Use Management 10.1. Current Additional Resource Use Conditions Currently there are no sanctioned commercial uses on the Preserve. 11. Budget Table 11.1. Projected Expenditures Table Projected Operating Costs 2024 2025 2025 2026 2027 Vegetation Treatment $6,000 $0 $6,000 $0 $6,000 Total Projected Costs $6,000 $0 $6,000 $0 $6,000 24 Packet Pg. 536 Conservation Collier Brewer's Landing Preserve Interim Land Management Plan 28.A.g 12. Appendix Table 12.1. Legal Description Folio Calculated Acres Legal Description 00209681000 4.09 10 48 27 ALL THAT PART OF SEC 10 AS DESC IN OR 1547 PG 859, LESS THAT PORTION AS DESC IN OR 6016 PG 658 38601360001 5.15 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 38 TR 14 OR 468 PG 749 38601320106 1 2.73 1 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 38 S1/2 OF TR 13 38601280000 1 2.81 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 38 N 180FT OF TR 12 12.2. Public Meeting Comments and Staff Responses 25 Packet Pg. 537 4OU41V a-J N C6 Z N Q Ln co a- a N E C O L W w N C6 cn ai v ai Ln Qj aell!Lu aoo iGoslnpV uol;lsmbod pue-1 : OZV6Z) NSOI s6ulpl04pue-1 9 V 8 •d•g 4uaWii sdN LO NWQ= WCz Y Q � IL Ha Hom AvH j� O �I N OH Z3NI N U (6 0 co Lfi L O C U (6 Q C O L C L O I..L co CO L VJ co (1) Co co d Q CO Lri 0) U co Z U) m (n u O U Uco co O Q Qco M C rJ O V co L ^X L U 'C W Q J O m . . 111112-- 7�Z] a c R N O Lo U � :!! QI N +� Q � 2 OH HIIAs M NJ -� Y OH Ol3LN38 If4prol I N ." NI AONVHB W OH 9=HnEl 3l U m w w 32 a ygPJ�� Q OH NVOHOW m 01 m � m �00� o Nl m O1N3HHOS T Z . N M O O U 0^ an-19 H31-1l03 MARKET gS OAl9 H31110D ¢ 2P 21q 3NHOHIMVH LO p m O d o � j y a z a o' ao soave W w ¢ Z .N 07 y w o p z GRAND LELY DR .6 o 0 c ro s a 4a cc >gs w mU¢U�O / , 1 N �J\5P o �`' OfSANDY LN F r1' aell!Lu aoo d.ioslnpV uol;lsinbotl puel : OZb6Z) NSOI OUIP104puBl 019 8 V'S :;uawyoe;;y O F oo 41 C N � Rt c CO a- n !_ cu C O O F 0 � d O O O O00 co \LnLn c6 Ln O L d m El v O ro *' c ci c a ro F= v 4-j O � N 2 L N Q N (B > O �O ro r-I u I� O O u W r-I O O O O O O O O O O m l0 ::I, N O w l0 ::J- N r-I r-I r-I r-I r-I r 0 0 ti 00 I a, U .0) 0 0 w U) 0 0 J aell!Lu aoo d.ioslnpV uoipslnboy pue-1 : OZ176Z) NSOI s6ulploypue-1 0 +g 8 -V's :;uawyoe;;d o 0 0 0 -1:r o 0 o m u► CO M Ln m 0 a a) .N 0 a a ar ca 3 Q o m m kD m N N Ln C .O a a, s an ar Vf H 0 a 00 m N r-I -I � .O a a, s an aj a) Q C) C +�+ U C U m U E O > u U E > v v +� a) U aIO V O v c>o N O 0 U > > > W —I N M r-I r-I r-I c-I r-I L U)_ Cll co .O Cll O U � -co 0Cll -a > � O L (o Q (D L (a ) Q L O C 0)O L (D c� D O }; CN U Cll (6 UU _0 � L Cll Q i N O_ L 4 (6 L Co O co U (n ._ to M4-1 U O �� N LL L L '� (o 0) +-, fn L -0 LL O Cll (n > C — � 4—ci CO Eca COS cn� aU) ELL O u cn �+1 C C� O O V� �O 02 >� �U �� C) U N M Co _ CU E � �_ Co Co co ?j E 0 C6 0.0 W n O ` 0 T O O CO N I a, ^n W aa;;iwuaoo iGosinPV Uoi;i N 0 M M N O 'O a a, .y N 0 a a� -a ca 3 Q 'o a v s wo v H 0 a N. -I IZIM O 'O a a, swo a, Q 4-1 c v v U c ca w U U U N t E U a)Q u a N N N N C � � O U N L4- 0-0 p N U) U N O N U (6 -0 10 V U cn .- (� L O i (n 0-070 2 O M L (� N^ L U -^' W O W = W N cn L L � > _ L O cocn O • � t� v 4- 0 M 070o N N (6 Q O Q (6 MIN ■ 0 T 0 0 C) _V N L '0 V) E a) C� G (a 0 4-0 i 0 U) N 0 0 J Lai aa;;lu woo A.aosinpd uoi;isinbod pue-1 : OZV6Z) NSOI s6ulploypue-1 E) +g 8 -Ts; :}uauayoe;;d O O O10 O 0 0 0 +N+ O O 0 0 0 0 a cu CA O a m W 3 Q O u7 M N ,� �O a ar s ar CA 0 a N +' 000 u 1 N O a .a aj s .a aj L 3 Q c aj v E +, Q) aj Ln cu ca c � in °1 m o '+� c o m cu v o > v rl N m M (h M (v1 1= ca o Z L) U N O >+ LL LL (6 s? U L Z, N U E OX m O N S? to O U O }' Q— caa�� c cac O U O O N O O E U v� 4- •� . L CD O cm O N 0 .N M LO N 6) IL z 1 U m a r1' aa;;lu woo A oslnpV uoi;isinbod pue-1 : OZV6Z) NSOI s6ulploypue-1 E) +g 8 -Ts; :}uauayoe;;d N \ o 0 C O a v 72 N LA O a cu 3 a O 00 [V 4a 00 Ln fV C O a v s Qj 3 a, 72 N kn O a kn N N O C_ O a v s nn v Q v cu d U � � � � v E an 0 L � v _ 0 N j N � a L ( O N Q U) O Z3 U O cn O 0); N N U �/� n C Q � Q C -0 i = 0- 0 z m 2 Z _� N O Dz i mcoE C m D 2E CL J u 0) -C N � Q LL m m Q 0 �'- (n O •� L L E N o-o 9941!Lu aoo iGoslnpV uol;lsmbod pue- : OZV6Z) NSOI s6ulploypue-1 E) +g g •yS WOWLJoe;;y s 'O d Y C Q N z ❑ N � a as N°m wvH R IL � H LmLr = a� ❑ m ro « Df u � � 'a a � d _ m Oa Z3NI as Hilns C, a m w x aaa-13HN3a CN wo as sa3ne 3� o� N� AaNvaa � m 3Y m yOP� a as Nv°aow a a Y 00, T ,m NlolNaaaos ante a31-1100 ,, S °Ala a31��OD w w V MP�K a r HD3NaOH1MVH C aO1pab8 m w w z GRAND LELY DR C r Ql O w O S/ oz \>\5P a 76p ¢ F c SANDY LN cu H~ U) U) L U) O L -0 U) O o o (1) LL LL c o ca �--� m 5, += o () U � CU 7C3 o �� a) c E E c m i o °6 M c CO 0 CD d . - aa;;iwwoD iGosinpy uoi;isinboy pue-1 : OZV6Z) tZ-9-9 se4epdn uoi;ismbov :;uewyoe44V - aa;;iu WOD d.iosinpV uoi;ismboy puel : OZ176Z) bZ-9-9 se4epdn uoipsinbov quempe;;y ca E 0 v � E 7 fl M Ln C O L Y Q U -a Ln Q1 d � * t0 ei W N m M �p 00 Lr i W > en W O O a ei L1 M ih a Q 0 a`�i N Ln O C ro O rn m ,E co L +, c6 N L!1 m Q LU ei Q 4^ iA Q N cI —1 cu Q Ln O U Q Ln06 W +7+ U H N U Q LL O iE Z Q _ Oa c� G N W eNi H Z 0~C cf a u m O a m Q m O N U1 d' ei ei z0. O N O LV Q o a m w V Q H w > w V u a O cc a v ro O_ Z) C O .Ll v Q rn c v E v Q Q J v v It N O N N - aa;;iu WOD d.iosinpV uoi;ismboy pue-1 : OZb6Z) bZ-9-9 se4epdn uoipsinbov quempe;;y Q N N N ti N O 00 N V♦ LO V♦ W CO U ` Q (0 U U v W w m H ~ w a 0 a 0 a c O ■� a J J J a U N N � Q 0) .) CIO N U) i N N _ C'7 N c� p �_ � � N � v Cr NM \ V- N 00 N 00 v � j N \ CD N o T" ♦+ V N N 0)-0 -0 Lo -0 N °' O CU > U N �. U)Q E N > > o > o .5 o y 0 L Q L o O Q y) �, u7 Z3 m Q Q Q Q Q s V a� n Q Co O N Q M I- C 07 LL c m U 0 N U U U m E U U U U oo p Q cu Uo 4- m o O ca cnU — — Um m m U)N M 0 � a� as L N Q i a) Q 0- m V o Q o o o U o a� a a o a LO _0 NT a >+ >+ >+ CV >+ N >, m N U U U U U N 00 It LO 6) IL z 1 U m a It 0 N M - 0841!L WOD d.iosinpV uoi;ismboy pue-1 : OZb6Z) bZ-9-9 se4epdn uoipsinbov quempe;;y Q Cd N W 0 U �U oU � m L 0 W 4-- U) W 0 U� Q N � U U) cn 4-0 E W E o Q U 0 -0 �--� n C: N ry U U m 2 N N N N N N N N N N N 00 00 m w w H H H rl Ln Ln N N N N N ` ` ` ` ` ` Crl L-n L-n Ln LLn L-n lO l0 L0 L0 L0 l0 u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u m m m m m m m m m m m m I- M L0 �t M Ln 't ^ O � H M N I� 1! rl I� rl rl rl O M 00 U! N N r" H N Ln H I" Ln N N H Z Ln� w O V) Ln 0< v~i w w D W w p Q D-i Ei Z l7 ~ w o Z ~ F w m z < O Q J= Ln W O Z O W J Ln J U ' U) Q O w O0 � Q W J O O J O Q O Q ui ui z O O J LU l� u O W O 0 N Ln 00 a) N u (6 MR - aa;;iu WOD d.iosinpV uoi;ismboy pue- : OZb6Z) bZ-9-9 se4epdn uoipsinbov quempe;;y LO Q LO 6) N d m Y C> R a - aa;;iu WOD d.iosinpV uoi;ismboy puel : OZ176Z) bZ-9-9 se4epdn uoipsinbov quempe;;y AMEN m 13 CL L m CL ■ ENEM *010 O 00 CM E i 4-0 co r W U) ^N I..L N rL V 2 L 0 w z N Q O Qo O U) N O N O M O U) N O N .� z E N Q — O L (.0 O 0z M 1 � N I N > r a (n ^a O I..L U) A, Co ^-W, /I a M C: 0- m a i . N N N Lo N E 4-0 -I--& N i O 00 W L U) a) E C/) W W riI . N O N N Lo N L N O co L U) N 2 ^L^'' ' VJ i • II N 0 00 T, RaoslnpV uoipslnboV pue-1 : OZ176Z) VZOZ dWl eA.aasaad Oulpue-1 sJOmOJ13 :4uauay3e44V Q� C6 �L N N N 6) IL z 1 U m a RaoslnpV uoipslnboV pue-1 OZV6Z) VZOZ dVil eA.aasaad Bulpue-1 SJOMOJ8 :4uauay3e44V \ \ \ \ M N LO \\ \ \ \ a \\ \ \ \ \ D IL W f' Q 4--i o o 5 a E E Q) �M Q) �� 0 �C 0c m o N �4-1 C- N U E s o l� E > � T \ cn (D Q) Q) 0 i(.wslnpV uol;lslnboVF pue-1 : OZb6Z) bZOZ dWl 0/uOSOJd Bulpue-1 siomeig :;u0wy3e}}y ro V a LO uO IL z 1 U m a RaoslnpV uoipslnboV pue-1 OZV6Z) VZOZ dVil eA.aasaad Bulpue-1 SJOMOJ8 :4uauay3e44V \ � i I i � I I i I I � + • C O 1 :, T in m CD S 0 L Zj O u O }O U c� E O O O O U) U cn cn Q CO LO m L � m +O J 0-- LO LO LO a� a CD 1 U m a Raoslnpd uoipslnboV pue-1 : OZb6Z) bZOZ dWl 0na0s0.ad 6ulpue-1 siomeig :4u0wy3e}}y +-+ O f6 0 a- a--j 0 - � O O � O N �a--+ > C6 0 > V) O _U � N >------------- 4 co LO uO 6) IL z 1 U m a RaoslnpV uoipslnboV pue-1 OZV6Z) VZOZ dVil eA.aasaad Bulpue-1 s.IOMGJg :;uawyoeUV ti LO uO 6) IL z 1 U m a RaoslnpV uoipslnboV pue-1 : OZ176Z) VZOZ dWl eA.aasaad Oulpue-1 sJOmOJ13 :4uauay3e44V cn vi c6 O (1) N U) N c� N L U) O L U s +� s O }, \ �E E E ' eo`------------- I RaoslnpV uoipslnboV pue-1 : OZ176Z) VZOZ dWl eA.aasaad Oulpue-1 sJOmOJ13 :4uauay3e44V O O N O O O N (-D N LA O O N O O O N (1D QD � � Ln N O R* O O O O O N QO QO -V� N N O V }' NO rCL +��+ O V W .� O V a! O a > rn LO u) 6) IL z 1 U m a 28.A.k Intrnductinn The Capital Project Planning, Impact Fees, and Program Management Division of Transportation Management Services Department (TMSD) is submitting this written petition to the County Manager requesting an Interest in Program Lands, specifically 6.9 acres (at the lake maintenance easement boundary, 4.8 acres at control elevation and 7.2 acres at the limit of construction line) of conservation lands within the Railhead Scrub Preserve. For the purpose of this petition, the lake maintenance size of 6.9 acres will be used and referred to as the interested Program Lands. In 2004, the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) approved the acquisition of 80.33 acres in North Naples through the Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Program to form the Railhead Scrub Preserve. An additional 55.03 acres was acquired in 2007, expanding the preserve to its current acreage of 135.36. In accordance with Ordinance 2006-58 known as the Conservation Collier Exceptional Benefits Ordinance, TMSD is requesting the interested Program Lands be used as part of the Veterans Memorial Boulevard Extension Project for a stormwater drainage pond. PETITION A. State the public purpose for which the Other -use Dedication is being required. 0 TMSD is responsible for planning transportation facilities such as roadways, pathways, and I* CD bicycle facilities to address the transportation needs of the community. This petition is requesting N an Other -Use Determination of 6.9 acres of Conservation Collier Lands within the Railhead Scrub 14 N Preserve to construct a stormwater pond necessary to construct Veterans Memorial Boulevard 14 Extension (VMB Ext.). The objective of this petition is to explain the need for the Program Lands and seek a determination that it is a Public Interest to allow the Program Lands to be acquired by m and transferred to the TMSD for the pond site. 0 A portion of the Conservation Collier parcel located in the Railhead Scrub preserve is required for a drainage pond necessary for the construction of the Veterans Memorial Boulevard extension to connect US 41 to Livingston Rd. The extension of Veteran's Memorial Blvd. (historically referred L to as Livingston Rd. E/W) has been an established need in the Long -Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) since the 2025 LRTP, adopted in January 2001. Since the adoption of the 2025 LRTP, c there have been numerous studies and planning documents all confirming the need for Veteran's 0 Memorial Blvd. as well as the need for sidewalks and shared use pathways along this corridor. With the completion of the Aubrey Rogers High School, the need has increased. a The proposed project will improve the multimodal connection inside the County's urbanized area, v will relieve traffic congestion, and provide for the safe and efficient movement of people, goods, and services. The additional capacity will provide for a more efficient connection between many community assets including existing neighborhoods, schools, and commercial businesses. The project will also reduce road maintenance needs, reduce delays by the added capacity and improve overall traffic operations. Documentation of VMB Ext.'s public purpose is available upon request. Q The VMB Ext. project has established overwhelming instances of a valid public purpose. To construct the project, Collier County must build a pond site for drainage. The pond site infrastructure is as vital to the project as the roadway lanes and cannot be considered a separate or Page 1 of 6 Packet Pg. 560 28.A.k independent effort. Therefore, all statements related to future right-of-way are intended to include all infrastructure improvements for the road, including the pond site. It is noted that this reasoning is memorialized in recent Conservation Collier Purchase Agreements which ensure Collier County Transportation can purchase a portion of the properties from Conservation Collier for future right- of-way, if and when needed, at the original per -acre acquisition cost, thereby creating an exception to the Exceptional Benefits Ordinance. B. Provide a history and discussion of alternatives to requesting the specific interest in Program Lands and demonstrate with supporting documentation as to why other alternatives are not acceptable. The VMB Ext. is a documented need and planned transportation improvement. The project appears in Collier County's Long -Range Transportation Plan and is documented in the Capital Budget as part of the Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) as a planned improvement. The VMB Ext. Project was divided into two segments to allow the portion serving the Aubrey Rogers High School to be completed when the school opened in 2023. Phase I extended the roadway from Livingston Road to Aubrey Rogers High School and Phase II extends the roadway from Aubrey Rogers High School to Old 41 Road and US 41. Collier County hired RWA Engineering (RWA) to evaluate and perform a pond siting analysis. The Veterans Memorial Boulevard Improvements Preliminary Drainage & Alternative Pond Siting Analysis (Report) was finalized in February 2020 and is part of the documentation for this petition. The Report was used for identifying the location and pond sizes for Phase I and Phase II. The direction provided to RWA, was to consider vacant property adjacent to the road corridor when considering locations for pond siting. Adjacent parcels with established businesses (commercial) or residential homes were not considered. The Report recommended Pond Site 1 as the 1st choice and concluded that Pond Site 1 was the most logical choice based on the proximity to the drainage basin and the Pond Siting Matrix scores. Pond Site 1 is the Program Land Site. The construction of Phase I is complete and the roadway is open to the public. The excess stormwater availability from the pond site used for Phase I has been calculated and accounted for N in the pond acreage needed for Phase II. An additional pond site for Phase II is required. In May 2023, Collier County acquired Pond Site 5 for the VMB Ext. Project as right-of-way and will be used for roadway and a stormwater pond site. This location was evaluated in the Report, and > ranked 3rd. The excess land has been accounted for in the pond acreage need for Phase II. The ,o existing County owned right-of-way in this corridor cannot accommodate the attenuation and c water quality treatment requirements for VMB Ext. improvements, and an additional acquisition process is required for Phase II of the project. Phase II requires an additional pond site, west of the a railroad, totaling approximately 6.9 acres. v After coordination and site visits with Conservation Collier staff, members of the RWA consulting team developed a conceptual pond site on Pond Site 1 (Parcel ID 00152600002) to demonstrate E the willingness to work together to reduce environmental impacts to wildlife species and scrub habitat located within the targeted pond site area. See attached Proposed Pond Site Exhibit. The Q pond site concept was refined and designed to demonstrate the continued coordination and the intent to minimize impacts to the area. The following Pond Sites were evaluated in the Report and are briefly summarized below. Page 2 of 6 Packet Pg. 561 28.A.k Pond Site I is located on the south side of the proposed roadway west of the existing railroad right-of-way. The pond would be on the north side of Parcel 00152600002 owned by Collier County and dedicated preserve land of Conservation Collier. The area is known as Railhead Scrub Preserve and was acquired as a separate 60 acres of the preserve area. As stated in the Report, Pond Site 1 was determined to be the most desirable based on the proximity to the drainage basin and the matrix scores. It is noted that, this specific parcel was purchased by the County with Conservation Collier land acquisition funds in full transparency that the future VMB Ext. would be located adjacent to the acquired parcels. As noted in recent purchase agreements utilizing Conservation Collier program funds, acquisitions in a future planned county road project corridor would have an exception to the Exceptional Benefits Ordinance. Pond Site 2 is located on the north side of Parcel 00153160004 which is the south side of the proposed roadway east of the existing railroad right-of-way. It is currently owned by N A Realty Trust, Inc. This site has two existing pond systems situated within 500ft and 1500 ft of the road footprint spanning approximately 7 acres and 11 acres, respectively of the parcel footprint. This site is an existing PUD Ordinance 1982-81 for 430 multi -family dwellings and is currently going through a PUD Amendment under application PL20150001695. As stated in the Report, this site is not located within the existing natural drainage basin (and proposed project drainage basins) that have been established by the existing railroad crossing. This pond site was determined to be less desirable from an engineering and environmental perspective and was ranked 5th by the Report. Pond Site 3 is located on the west side of Old US 41 south of the future roadway alignment and is a portion of Parcel 00152240006 owned by Tri I Assoc, LLC. The only available land on this parcel is currently under a wetland conservation easement that would need to be vacated and mitigated in another location. This pond site was determined to be less desirable from an environmental perspective and ranked 41h by the Report. Pond Site 4 is located on the west side of Old US 41 north of the future roadway alignment and is a portion of Parcel 00145280002 owned by Meadow Brook Preserve, LLC. The only available land on this parcel is currently under a South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) conservation easement that would need to be vacated and mitigated in another location. The Report determined that this site was less suitable for the project and ranked this site as 2°d. In order to pursue this site, the County would need to demonstrate no other options were available, including the #1 ranked Conservation Collier property. Pond Site 5 is located directly adjacent to Tamiami Trail North (US 41). The County purchased a Parcel 00154600000 in May 2023 for this project. The parcel will be used for the road and the 6 remainder will be used for a small portion of stormwater pond. The site is too small to be the only offsite pond location but has been included in the stormwater capacity calculations. This site was ranked 3rd by the Report. E The development of this project requires approximately 6.9 acres off -site ponds for drainage. The Q Report noted that the use of one single pond site is preferable to the use of two disconnected sites when maintenance, operation and monitoring are considered. The additional costs associated with acquisition and right-of-way permitting with two sites adds additional costs with no additional benefit. Page 3 of 6 Packet Pg. 562 28.A.k As discussed in the Report, the other alternative locations are less desirable, and the Report recommended siting the drainage pond within the Railhead Scrub Preserve. In addition, other pond sites have been acquired to decrease the required acreage necessary from the Program Lands. C. Demonstrate with supporting documentation that the requested Other -use Dedications of portion of Program Lands takes the minimum acreage and, to the maximum extent possible, minimizes deleterious intrusion, preserves higher quality or acreage of lands than those sought if a land exchange is being offered, impact the lowest quality habitat, and avoids habitat fragmentation, noise and light pollution that would adversely affect the adjacent remaining Program Lands. Pond Site 1 was deemed to be the most favorable based on the Report evaluation and analysis. To minimize the area needed from the Conservation Collier land, the County has done an advanced acquisition of Pond Site 5. In addition, the County is expanding the pond area associated with the Phase 1 improvements for the benefit of the Phase II project improvements. Therefore, the least amount of Conservation Collier land has been used in the pond site need calculation. At the time of acquisition of the lands by Conservation Collier, it was acknowledged a roadway would traverse the parcel. The alternatives developed and documented in the Report include evaluation of alternatives and consideration of environmental impacts. Staff carefully considered the recommendations of the Report, which included limiting, to the greatest extent possible, the acreage needed for the VMB Ext. Coordination with Conservation Collier staff indicated that the methodology to follow when evaluating habitats was to give the highest priority to tortoises, then scrub habitat then wetlands. This guidance was used in evaluating and identifying the general pond site location on the Program Lands. The pond site concept was refined after coordination with Conservation Collier Staff and the preliminary design takes into consideration the minimum acreage needed and demonstrates the intent to minimize impacts to the area. D. Demonstrate with supporting documentation a substantial public need for the particular interest in the Program Lands requested, why there are no acceptable alternatives to meet the need, why the competing public use must occur at that location, and how the Other -use Dedications of portion of Program Lands will be offset to ensure an Exceptional Benefit to the Program. The adopted LRTP's, the AUIR, studies and analysis, the existing and expected deficiencies in the c transportation roadway network demonstrate a substantial public need for the VMB Ext. project. The pond site within the Program Preserve Lands is necessary for the road project and an a Exceptional Benefit to the community. Alternatives to siting the pond on Conservation Collier 6 land have been discussed above and in the Report. In addition, acquisition of the Program Lands within the preserve was completed with knowledge of a future roadway. Sidewalk access provided by the future roadway was incorporated into the long-range public access plan for Conservation r Collier. The road is being built for the betterment of the community and will provide improved access to the Conservation Collier lands by allowing residents and visitors roadside access to enjoy Q and appreciate the natural beauty and wildlife it has to offer. This will encourage outdoor activities such as hiking, birdwatching, and nature exploration, and foster a deeper connection between individuals and the environment. Page 4 of 6 Packet Pg. 563 28.A.k The Exceptional Benefit of public access to Conservation Collier lands is an essential element of the Conservation Collier Program and the management plan. The VMB Ext. project will provide public access to Conservation Collier lands which they currently do not have. The Railhead Scrub Preserve Land Management Plan indicates a need for improved access and notes considerable constraints with current access via private roads and a railroad crossing. The construction of Veterans Memorial Phase I and Aubrey Rogers High School near a portion of the Railhead Scrub Preserve offers a unique opportunity to educate Collier County high schoolers and the public about the rarity and imperiled nature of this rosemary scrub ecosystem. The Conservation Collier staff has documented the trespassing concern. This project and the access created by it will restrict unauthorized and detrimental access. Creating a safe, necessary, and legal managed public access for education on the southern property while creating a boundary with the road to protect the northern lands is an exceptional benefit to the program. There is currently no legal physical access to the property. The use of the Program Lands for the road and pond would create public access. The Conservation area was intended for compatible nature -based public access and passive opportunities such as for hiking trails, education programs and research. The construction of VMB Ext. and the pond provides the exceptional benefit of public access not currently available on the Program Lands but included in the goals of the program. E. Demonstrate how the Other -use Dedications of portions of Program Lands will not adversely affect any State or Federally listed species. All work within this area will be permitted and in compliance with all Federal, State and Local permitting agencies, as appropriate. Those agencies may include the US Army Corp. of Engineers, Florida Department of Environmental Protection and SFWMD. The Environmental Resource Permitting process has begun as part of this project. All laws, ordinances, regulations and required compliance activities will be adhered to during all phases of the Project. F. Demonstrate that the proposed compensation meets the goals and purposes of the Program and provides an Exceptional Benefit to the Program. Safe, managed, and legal public access is a goal of Conservation Collier that is not currently available on the Railhead Preserve. As mentioned above, improved access to the Conservation Collier lands is an exceptional benefit to the program. This project will help encourage and manage a outdoor activities such as hiking, birdwatching, and nature exploration, and foster a deeper connection between individuals and the environment. 6 c To ensure the conveyance of the interest in program lands results in an exceptional benefit to the E program, this petition proposes to offset the acquisition and transfer of land through a financial compensation based on a certified appraisal of the property. TMSD Staff recommends an appraisal 2 of the Program Lands to establish reasonable value of the property and existing market conditions. Q Compensation into the Conservation Collier fund could allow for increased future acquisitions. The financial compensation for the acquisition has the potential to help Conservation Collier preserve, restore and manage protected land. Page 5 of 6 Packet Pg. 564 28.A.k In addition to the financial compensation established by the appraisal, TMSD recommends contributing the following exceptional benefits to the program: • Providing a small pipe (minimum 18 inches in diameter) set at -grade. • A financial contribution of $35,000 to Conservation Collier for use at the preserve. • Coordination meetings at key project milestones. G. Include the current value of the land to be acquired as provided for in Section 4.02 [of the Ordinance]. For consideration, if the Railhead Preserve Property was acquired today, it would have been exempt from the Exceptional Benefits clause and Collier County's TMSD would reimburse Conservation Collier for the acreage in the Program Land at the original per -acre acquisition cost. Calculated at $10,650,000 divided by 60 acres and total approximately $177,500 per acre 6.9 acres would total approximately $1,224,750. Based on the Ordinance, the value is based on the current land value. According to the Collier County Property Appraiser website record for Folio # 0015260002, the Program Land is shown to be 60 acres with a total land value of $6,000,000. When divided, the value is $100,000 per acre. The 6.9 acres would be estimated at a value of approximately $690,000. An appraisal of the property is recommended to determine the current value of the Program Land to be used for the pond site. TMSD, at their expense will have the property appraised by a certified appraiser. U Ui a Page 6 of 6 Packet Pg. 565 28.A.1 Rural Fringe Mixed Use District - North Belle Meade Natural Resource Protection Area Undeveloped Sending Parcels NBMO-NRPA TDR Agreements or Conservation Parcels Acres Easements (CEs) Parcels with TDR Agreement or CE 329 3,485.1 Parcels without TDR Agreement or CE 270 1,722.8 Total 599 5,207.9 NBMO-NRPA TDR Agreements Parcels Acres Parcels with TDR Agreement 287 2,012.0 Parcels without TDR Agreement 312 3,195.9 Totall 5991 5,207.9 NBMO-NRPA Conservation Easements Parcels Acres Parcels with Conservation Easement 145 2,241.4 Parcels without Conservation Easement 454 2,966.5 Tota 11 5991 5,207.9 NBMO-NRPA TDR Agreements and CEs Parcels Acres Parcels with both TDR Agreement and CE 103 770.1 Parcels without both TDR Agreement and CE 496 4,437.8 Total 599 5,207.9 Packet Pg. 566 Q 06 N AJOSinpV uoi;isinboV pUe-1 : OZV6Z) dew lowed epeeW elleg 4:PoN :}uaw'43L' V w LO 6 CM-1 Z 0 co ' a to LO z � a o v Y V cv a. O U 1W CD z_ C� LU z_ (p ❑ O z w m 1,9z oQ 2in >, m 0� ca z z O O > O LLLL 0 N a� U L 70 0- O O 0) m C _0) p � 2 %+ (D C U U) O aD E N - N Q C W U O m i> N C O O O U z U n n - � � U E Q N O L QJ C CO L ❑ O O U Q My 0 OD LO N Lq O O V Z 0 z w co 75 m z ry z 6 D 7-5 LL