Agenda 07/09/2024 Item #16B12 (To Approve the submittal of the LGFR beach and Inlet Applications to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) for FY2025/2026007/09/2024
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to approve and authorize the Chairman to execute the submittal of the Local Government
Funding Request (LGFR) Beach Project Applications to the Florida Department of Environmental
Protection (FDEP) for Fiscal Year 2025/2026.
OBJECTIVE: To approve the submittal of the LGFR Beach and Inlet Applications to the Florida Department of
Environmental Protection (FDEP) for long range budget plan requests for beach renourishment projects for fiscal
year 2025/2026.
CONSIDERATION: On February 27, 2024, (Agenda Item 16BI), the Board of County Commissioners (the
"Board"), awarded a Work Order to APTIM Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc., under Contract No. 18-7432-CZ
to assist the County with the preparation of the 2025/2026 LGFR applications for Collier County's coastal
protection projects.
APTIM Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc., assessed all the elements of the County's coastal projects required by
Chapter 6213-36, F.A.C., the LGFR applications, and guidance documents in order to increase the County's FDEP
ranking and cost -sharing opportunities. The evaluation was completed for the County's coastal protection projects:
South Marco Island, Collier Beach Renourishment Projects, and the County's inlet projects: Wiggins Pass and
Doctors Pass.
The Fiscal Year 2025/2026 applications will entail the following locations and funding requests:
South Marco Island - Design, Permitting, Monitoring (Physical & Turtle) and Beach Tilling
Collier County Beaches - Doctors Pass Design, Sub -surface Investigation, Permitting, Construction,
Monitoring (Physical, Biological, Shorebirds, and Turtles) and Beach Tilling
Wiggins Pass Inlet - Permitting (Full Channel Dredging), Construction (Full Channel Dredging),
Monitoring (Physical & Environmental), and Beach Tilling
This item is consistent with the Quality of Place Objectives of the County's Strategic Plan.
FISCAL IMPACT: The Local Government Funding Requests are prepared yearly for anticipated state cost share
funding reimbursement. The requests are estimates based on project scope, funding availability, ranking, and other
state and federal funding. Projections for future years are also included in the requests for informational purposes.
FDEP determines the final cost share ratio at the time of award and generally will cost share up to 50% for beach
projects and up to 75% for inlet projects of the non -Federal project cost.
The total FY 2025/2026 estimated total costs ($4,397,500) include:
BEACH
STATE SHARE
LOCALSHARE
FUNDING REQUEST
South Marco Island
$100,300
$272,200
$372,500
Collier County Beaches
$934,500
$1,270,500
$2,205,000
Wiggins Pass Inlet
$910,000
$910,000
$1,820,000
Total Request
$1,944,800
$2,452,700
$4,397,500
Tourist Development Tax funds are currently available within the TDC Beach Renourishment Fund (1105) to
accomplish this work. State approval may lead to future state cost share participation on these projects through
FDEP grant agreement and contract.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: This item is consistent with the Conservation and Coastal Management
Packet Pg. 508
07/09/2024
Element of the Growth Management Plan.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item is approved as to form and legality and requires majority vote for
approval. - CMG
RIECOMMENDATION: To approve and authorize the Chairman to execute the submittal of the Local
Government Funding Request (LGFR) Beach Project Applications to the Florida Department of Envirom-nental
Protection (FDEP) for Fiscal Year 2025/2026.
Prepared by: Andrew Miller, Coastal Zone Management, Capital Project Planning, Impact Fees, and Program
Management
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. [LINKED] FY25-26 — LGFR-Beach Application (PDF)
2. FY25-26—LGFR-Beach Application -South Marco Island (PDF)
3. FY25-26—LGFR-hilet Application -Wiggins (PDF)
I Packet Pg. 509
07/09/2024
COLLIER COUNTY
Board of County Commissioners
Item Number: 16.B.12
Doe ID: 293 10
Item Summary: Recommendation to approve and authorize the Chairman to execute the submittal of the Local
Government Funding Request (LGFR) Beach Project Applications to the Florida Department of Environmental
Protection (FDEP) for Fiscal Year 2025/2026.
Meeting Date: 07/09/2024
Prepared by:
Title: — Capital Project Planning, Impact Fees, and Program Management
Name: Maria Becerra
06/25/2024 12:09 PM
Submitted by:
Title: Division Director - Capital Proj Plan, Impact Fees — Capital Project Planning, Impact Fees, and Program
Management
Name: Beth Johnssen
06/25/2024 12:09 PM
Approved By:
Review:
Transportation Management Services Department Jeanne Marcella
Department
Road Maintenance Jeanne Marcella TMSD Reviewer
Capital Project Planning, Impact Fees, and Program Management Gloria Herrera
Capital Project Planning, Impact Fees, and Program Management Andrew Miller
Capital Project Planning, Impact Fees, and Program Management Beth Johnssen
Transportation Management Operations Support Tara Castillo
Transportation Management Operations Support Brandy Otero
County Attorney's Office Colleen Greene Level 2 Attorney Review
Transportation Management Services Department Trinity Scott
Grants
Office of Management and Budget
County Attorney's Office
Grants
Community & Human Services
County Manager's Office
Joanna Partyniewicz Level 2 Grants Review
Debra Windsor Level 3 OMB Gatekeeper Review
Jeffrey A. Klatzkow Level 3 County Attorney's Office Review
Therese Stanley OMB Reviewer
Maggie Lopez OMB Reviewer
Amy Patterson Level 4 County Manager Review
Transportation Management Services
Completed 06/26/2024 8:57 AM
Skipped 06/26/2024 8:57 AM
TMSD Reviewer Completed
06/26/2024 9:06 AM
TMSD Reviewer Completed
06/26/2024 10:01 AM
TMSD Reviewer Completed
06/26/2024 10:05 AM
TMSD Reviewer Completed
06/26/2024 10:32 AM
TMSD Reviewer Completed
06/26/2024 1:43 PM
Completed 06/26/2024 2:32 PM
Transportation Completed
06/27/2024 11:59 AM
Completed 07/01/2024 8:23 AM
Completed 07/01/2024 8:32 AM
Completed 07/01/2024 9:07 AM
Completed 07/01/2024 12:07 PM
Completed 07/01/2024 2:39 PM
Completed 07/02/2024 5:22 PM
I Packet Pg. 510 1
07/09/2024
Board of County Commissioners Geoffrey Willig Meeting Pending 07/09/2024 9:00 AM
I Packet Pg. 511 1
Beach Management Funding Assistance Program
Local Government Funding Request
Fiscal Year 2025/2026
Beach Projects Application
PART 1. GENERAL INFORMATION
Local Sponsor I Collier County Coastal Management Program
Federal ID Number (FEID) 159-6000558
Primary Contact Name lAndrew Miller Title [M::anager
Mailing Address Line 1 12685 South Horseshoe Drive, Unit 103
Mailing Address Line 2 1
city INaples I Zip CodeF34104 Telephone Number 1239-252-2922
Email Address landrew.miller@colliercountyfl.com
Additional Contact Information
PART III: CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that all information provided with this application is true and complete to the best of my knowledge.
Signature of Local Sponsor I
Electronic or scanned signatures accepted.
Printed Name Date
ATTEST
CRYSTAL K KINZEL, CLERK
Approved as to form and legality
U
2
Assistant County Attomey
F Packet Pg. 512
Beach Management Funding Assistance Program
Local Government Funding Request
Fiscal Year 2025/2026
Beach Projects Application
PART III: EVALUATION CRITERIA
1. Project Name: (as listed in the Strategic Beach Management Plan)
JCollier County Beach Renourishment
2. Project Description; Include county, location with reference to DEP range monuments, brief project history, and description of
proposed activities.
The project includes nourishment and monitoring of the Collier County beaches, dredging of Doctors
Pass and erosion control structures for sand retention.
The project is located between FIDEP R-22+300 to R-37, R-42 — R-54+400, and R-58A to R-79, and
includes three reaches, Vanderbilt Beach, Park Shore, and Naples. Dunes will be restored to pre -storm
conditions when damaged. Permit design is to a 100 ft. wide beach in Vanderbilt and Naples Beaches
and a 85 ft. wide beach in Park Shore, with a 6-year project design life.
Between 2017 and 2020 approximately 38,000 cubic material was placed from Clam Pass onto the
beaches on either side of the inlet and an additional 20,000 cy was placed in the newly permitted
segment.
Park Shore Beach was nourished with approximately 130,000 cubic yards of sand as part of the 2019
project.
Naples Beach received approximately 30,000 cubic yards of sand dredged from Doctors Pass in 2018
placed in the nearshore.
The reach from the Doctors Pass south jetty to R-60 was nourished with sand in late 2020. Vanderbilt
Beach (R-22 to R-32, 77,340 cy), Pelican Bay (R-33 to R-36, 20,000 cy) and Naples Beach (R-62 to
R-74, 57,330 cy) were nourished in 2021 through Truck Haul. In Spring 2022 Doctors Pass was
dredged with material placed at Lowdermilk Park from R-60 to R-62,
Following the passage of Hurricane Ian, an emergency berm project restored portions of the dry beach
within the project areas in spring/summer 2023. The South Naples portion (R-79 to R-89) of the
emergency project is planned for fall 2024.
The County plans to conduct a regular renourishment of the Park Shore beaches (R-44 to R-54) in the
fall of 2024.
Historically, the County has utilized upland sand mines and conducted truck haul projects to renourish
their beaches; however, the County will continue to pursue the potential use of offshore borrow areas
through further investigations in upcoming years.
K" �_
FPacket Pg. 513
Beach Management Funding Assistance Program
Local Government Funding Request
Fiscal Year 2025/2026
Beach Projects Application
3. Use of Requested Program Funds: Provide a brief description of tasks to be completed in each requested phase (Feasibility,
Design, Construction, Monitoring, or USACE Multiphase). Indicate which tasks are cost reimbursement from previous fiscal years.
IFY 2023/2024
Construction - FEMA Berm Project
IFY 2024/2025
Design/Construction - Hurricane Ian Post Storm Restoration Ph 2.
Design/Construction - Park Shore Renourishment
FY 2025/2026
Construction - Doctors Pass Dredging Construction and Sand Bypassing
Design - Borrow Area Survey & Investigation, Doctors Pass Dredging Rock Removal Channel
Re -Alignment, Sub -Surface Investigation Design and Permitting
Monitoring - Physical, Biological, Shorebirds, Turtles, Tilling
4. Map: Provide as an attachment. The map(s) of the project area must be formatted at a minimum of 1" = 200'scale and include a
compass rose and legend.
Map elements must include:
1. Project boundary: DEP reference monuments and shoreline designated as critically eroded
2. Eligibility: Indicate lengths of eligible shoreline based on criteria outlined in Chapter 6213-36.007, F.A.C.
a. Beach access locations: indicate primary or secondary access, and include the shoreline length, number and location
of auto parking spaces, mass transit stops, bike parking spaces, and public restroorn facilities within 1/4 mile walking distance
of each access
b. Public lodging establishments: include the length fronting the project shoreline, and include the length of
street -side frontage for lodging within 1/4 mile walking distance of a secondary beach access location
3. Recreational benefits: Comprehensive list of current land use designations of properties fronting the project shoreline
4. Value of upland property: Include one -quarter mile buffer and provide a comprehensive list of the values of properties
(data from year 2023) that are enclosed or intersected by the buffer, The 2023 property value tax roll data and ArcGIS
shapefiles can be obtained from the Department of Revenue website: https;//floridarevenue.corn/property/Pages/
DataPortal—RequestAssessmentRoliGlSData.aspx, See Guidance Document for more information.
Vanderbilt: R-22+300 to R-37 = $5,344,157,776
Park Shore: R-42 to R-54+400 = $8,049,857;259
Naples: 58A to R-79 = $528,694,128
South Naples: R-79 to R-89 (Since there is no established ECL in this area the PV was
not determined)
S. Project length: Total restored project length (in feet) of the critically eroded area
(as listed in the Strategic Beach Management Plan).
-Van derb It: R-22+300 to R-37 = 14,985 feet
Park Shore: R-42 to R-54+400 = 12,976 feet
Naples: 58A to R-79 = 19,103 feet
South Naples: R-79 to R-89 = 9,960 feet
67'A Q�
F—Packet Pg. 514
Beach Management Funding Assistance Program
Local Government Funding Request
Fiscal Year 2025/2026
Beach Projects Application
Eligibility: Required for all beach projects pursuant to Chapter 6213-36.007, F.A.C. Provide as a separate attachment, if needed.
Location/Access Name: Use the official name of the park or road that Is associated with the public access,
DEP Reference Monument: Use the DEP monument that is closest to the main public access location.
Type of Access: Indicate Primary or Secondary beach access in accordance with the definitions in Chapter 6213-36, F.A.C.
Width of Access/Frontage: The length of the legal boundary (in feet) of the public access or lodging along the beach project
shoreline. For public lodging establishments that do not front the beach, indicate the street -side length of the legal property
boundary (in feet) that is used as the main access to the establishment,
Number of Eligible Units: A unit is defined as one automobile parking space, one rental unit in a public lodging establishment, one
mass transit stop, or four bicycle parking spots.
Additional Width from Eligible Units: Total distance (feet) added to the Width of Access/Frontage. If there are multiple types of
eligibility units used for this calculation, show the calculation separately for each.
Total Eligible Shoreline. Sum of the Width of Access/Frontage and Additional Width from Eligible Units columns. Eligible shorelines
cannot overlap.
Website Link for DBPR License: Provide the link to the Department of Business and Professional Regulation (DBPR) website for
proof of licensure for any public lodging establishments used for eligibility or the Recreational Benefits ranking criteria.
Location/
Access Name
DEP Reference
Monument
Type of Access
Width of
Access/
Frontage (ft)
Number of
Eligible Units
Additional
Width from
Eligible Units
(ft)
Total Eligible
Shoreline (ft)
Website Link
for DBPR
License
See Attached
J
F—Packet Pg. 515
Location/Name
R-Monumewit
Type of
� Access
Widthaf
I Access/Frontage
Total Public Units or
Parking Spaces
I
I Additional width from
Eligibility Unift
SEligIble
horeane
Ifeet)
Website Link for IDBPR License
Vanderbilt Segment
Dolnor Mggirs; State
Recreation
R-22
Primary
6G
340
2,64o
2,700
NA
Bluabill Beach Access
R-22
Secondary
60
0
0
60
MA
L. Pl.y. Beach Resort
R-26
Public
Lodging
597
189
0
597
ittPS://www.myfloridalicense.com/LicenseDetail.asp?Sit)
�&1&6C 136 F49EDE D(:B7 B2 DA35 1`01311303 FF871
Vimd-blft Beach Blvd.
R-29
Primary
130
340
2,640
2,770
NA
Ritz Carlton Hotel
R-30
Pub:lc
Lodg ng
742
350
Overlap
I
https://www.mvfloridalicense.com/LicenseDetall.asp?SID
=&id=513298F412824 BC8458810C0178RAWK
Park Share Segment
Clam P-s Park
R-44
Primary
3345
171
5,280
8,625
MA
Seagate Drive North and
South)
R-45.5
Se,.nd.,y
100
3B
2,006
Overlap
NA
Horizon Way
U-52
Secondary
60
36
1,901
1,961
NA
Vedado Way
R-53
Secondary
60
40
2,112
2,172
NA
Via Mtramar
R-56
Secondary
60
40
2,112
7,172
NA
Naples Segment
Location/Name
R-Monument
Type of
Access
Width of
AccesslFroatage
Total Public Units or
Parking Spaces
Addit Width from
E�lgiblllity Unit
Eligible
Shoreline
(feet)
Websfte Link forDBPR License
Edgewater Beach Hotel
R 59
Public
lodging
265
0
0
265
httos://www.mvfloe'idaticense.com/LicenseDetall.ast)?Sl D
=&Id=5575452E59C2CC7C6775BBE7289DF24B
Lowdermilk Park
H-61
Primary
920
200
5,280
6,?,Go
NA
Eour Seasons Hotel
R-63
Public
Lodging
939
319
Overlap
Overlap
htti)s:/ILNw rnyfloridalicensexom/License Detail. asp?Sl D
—&id-63331099AAF2lB5550704309C7498BOF
8' Ave N (S. Golf)
R-63.5
Secondary
60
40
2,112
1,380
NA
7' AV. N
H-64
Secondary
60
12
634
694
NA
N—th Lk. AV.
R-G&5
Secondary
60
40
2,112
60
NA
eAve N
R-65
Secondary
60
12
634
60
NA
4' Ave N
R-66
Secondary
60
16
845
905
1 NA
31d Ave N
R-66.5
Secondary
(0
16
845
60
NA
Z' Ave N
R-67
Secondary
69
16
845
905
NA
I" Ave N
R-67.5
Secondary
69
17
B98
W
NA
CentralAve
R-68
Secondary
fi(I
12
634
60
NA
I" Ave S
R-68.5
Secondary
69
12
634
60
NA
2" Ave S
R-69
S.00tid.ry
60
12
634
694
NA
Y'Ave S
R-69.5
Secondary
60
634
22
NA
4' Ave S
R-70
S—Acl-y
60
634
NA
4)
4)
4)
x
4)
0
C
W
E
(D
:E
(D
0
C
M
CD
0
CL
CL
M
0
C
0
M
C
CD
E
E
0
0
(D
z
:3
C
CD
E
M
0
M
(C-AQ)
FPacket Pg. 516
5� AV. S
R-70.5
Secondary
60
12
634
1,380
NA
Hotel Escalanle
R-71
'u blic
Wging
150
10
overlap
Overlap
https://www.mvfloridalicense.com/Licenset)etaii,asp?SID
=&id=441346OF722FFE31272B68944987DBIA
6' AV. 5
R-71
Secondary
60
12
634
694
MA
7' Ave 5
R-71.5
Secondary
60
16
945
905
N A
Ave S
9-72
Secondary
60
12
634
694
MA
Ave S.
R-72.5
secondary
60
12
634
694
MA
10' Ave.%
R-73
Secondary
60
12
634
694
NA
11' Av.S
R-73.5
Secondary
60
12
634
694
NA
Broad Ave
R-74
Secondary
60
31
1,637
3,6q7
NA
12' Ave 5
R-74.5
Primary
60
100
5,290
5,340
NA
13' Ave $
R-IS
Secondary
60
12
634
694
WA
14' Ave S
R-75.5
Secondary
60
31
1,637
1,697
NA
15�' Ave $
R-76
Secondary
60
12
634
694
NA
16' Ave S
R-76.5
secondary
60
0
0
60
NA
17' Ave S
R-77
secondary
60
0
0
60
NA
le Ave S
R-77.5
Secondary
60
0
0
60
NA
&h Ave S / Shell AN
R-78.5
Secondary
60
0
0
60
NA
21" Ave 5
R-7&5
Secondary
GO
0
0
60
NA
31nd
R-82
Secondary
60
12
634
694
NA
33nd Ave 1c,.1i,
R-83
Seconda�
60
12
614
694
NA
4)
4)
4)
x
4)
0
C
w
E
(D
:E
(D
0
C
M
CD
0
I-
CL
CL
M
0
C
0
M
E
E
0
CD
C%4
z
:3
C
CD
E
M
0
M
— (C—Iqn�
FPacket Pg. 517
Beach Management Funding Assistance Program
Local Government Funding Request
Fiscal Year 2025/2026
Beach Projects Application
7. Schedule and Budget: Provide as a separate attachment, if needed. Clearly indicate project phase: Feasibility (F), Design (D),
Construction (C), Monitoring (M), or USACE Multiphase (USACE). Include the year of post -construction monitoring in the description.
8. Cost Reimbursement: Specify eligible costs incurred during the three years prior to the current application's fiscal year that are
not in a current DEP agreement and have not been reimbursed (this includes fiscal years 22/23, 23/24, and 24/25). Eligible costs will
be added to the current funding request,
9. Current and Future Costs- Specify eligible costs for the current application's fiscal year that are not in a current DEP agreement
and have not been reimbursed as well as the estimated costs for the next 4 years. Note: If Construction costs are requested in the.
current fiscal year, then the Year I Post -Construction Monitoring costs will be added to the current funding..request
Fiscal
Year
Project Phase
Description
Federal Cost
State Cost
Local Cost
Tota I Cost
22/23
23/23
22/23
23/24
Construction
FEMA Berm Project
TBD
TBD
TBD
$ 21,906,100
24/25
Design
Hurricane Ian Post Storm Restoration Ph 2.
$0
TBD
TBD
$54,136.50
24/25
Construction
Hurricane Ian Post Storm Restoration Ph 2.
$0
TBD
TBD
$2,382,600
24/25
Design
Park Shore Renourishment
$0
$43,300
$58,818
$102,118
24/25
Construction
Park Shore Renourishment
$0
$2.794,900
$3,799,976
$6,594,876
25/26
Construction
DoGtors Pass Dredging construction and Sand Bypassing
$0
$400,500
$544,500
$945,000
25/26
Design
Rk R1�—1 &b�d 11p�n Dn�..P 0
$0
$63,600
$86,400
$150,000
25/26
Monitoring
Physical, Biological, Shorebirds, Turtles, Tilling
$0
$194,900
$265,100
$460,000
25/26
Design
Borrow Area Survey & Investigation
$0
$275,500
$374,500
$650,000
26/27
Monitoring
Physical, Biological, Shorebirds, Turtles, T illing
$0
$212,500
$288,900
$501,
( OA
F—Packet Pg. 518
Beach Management Funding Assistance Program
Local Government Funding Request
Fiscal Year 2025/2026
Beach Projects Application
Fiscal
Year
Project Phase
Description
Federal Cost
State Cost
Local Cost
Total Cost
27/28
Design
Beach Renourishment Design R23-R89
$0
$50,900
$69,100
$120,000
27/28
Monitoring
Physical, Biological, Shorebirds, Turtles, Tilling
$0
$231,600
$314,900
$546,500
27/28
28/29
Construction
Beach Renourishment Construction R23-R89
$0
$4,026,100
$5,473,900
$9,500,000
211/29
Monitoring
Physical, Biological, Shorebirds, Turtles, Tilling
$0
$252,500
$343,200
$595,700
28/29
29/30
Construction
Doctors Pass Rock Removal and Realignment Dredging
$0
$1,483,300
$2,016,700
$3,500,000
29/30
Monitoring
Physical, Biological, Shorebirds, Turtles, Tilling
$0
$275,200
$374,100
$649,300
29/30
8. Tourism -related impacts: Criteria is calculated by the Department using 2023 data. For reference, tax data can be obtained from
the Department of Revenue website: http s.-//f I orid a rove n u e.com /Data Porta I/Pa ges/TaxResearch,as px See Guidance Document
for more information,
(-- Current funding request includes construction and year one post -construction monitoring
(- Project is managed by two or more counties
Additional comments
Local Option Sales Tax Coll. July 2022 through June 2023= $117,092,827
Tourist Development Tax July 2022 through June 2023 = $43,656,650
Line 39 of Form 10 April 2023 through end of March 2024 = $82,393,635.83
9. Federal involverneft The documentation to verify authorization, federal cost share percentage, and status of funding award
must be provided with the application materials for the award of points.
Is the project Federally authorized bythe USACE?
Authorization Year: Fxpiration Year:
Does this project have a signed USACE Chiefs report or Civil Works Congressional authorization for the
requested phase?
USACE federal cost share percentage for this project (excluding FCCE): 1 -1
(CAO)
Packet Pg. 519
Beach Management Funding Assistance Program
Local Government Funding Request
Fiscal Year 2025/2026
Beach Projects Application
Select all that apply for the requested project phase(s) and include documentation with application materials.
Executed USACE project agreement
Included in USACE work plan
Approved FEMA Project Worksheet
included in Congressional Appropriations Act
(-- Other documentation:
C�111.,C—ty.ndllr. USAGE have xmtcul fad.ra I IV funded fee sib!] Itystudy and the prejac I is I i sled in a corrent federal budget d—mant.
10. Storm damage reduction benefits: Criteria is calculated by the Department,
What is the volume (cy) of advanced nourishment lost since the last sand placement event of (See Below)
a beach restoration or nourishment project as measured above the Mean High Water
contour? Data should be consistent with the annual post -construction monitoring reports.
For restoration projects, what is the historical erosion rate? 1-0.61 foot/year
11. Cost effectiveness: Criteria is calculated by the Department. A project design analysis and supporting documentation must be
provided with the application materials for the award of points. See Guidance Document for more information.
What is the proposed sand placement volume (cy)?
What is the nourishment interval (years)?
Select all that apply for the current project funding request:
FEmergency berm: 45,000 tons, Park Shore: Approx. 100,000 cy
16
C Enhanced longevity; Propose structural or design components that could extend the beach nourishment interval
Dune addition: Incorporate new or enhanced dune structures or new or existing dune restoration and revegetation
projects
Innovative technology: Propose innovative technologies designed to reduce project costs
C Regionalization: Two or more local sponsors manage projects together or projects propose regional sediment
management strategies to conserve sand resources or reduce project costs
Upland Volume Change 1/12 to 1/22
Vanderbilt Beach: R-22 to R-30.8 :-- 41,110 cy
Pelican Bay Beach: R-30.8 to R-37 = 16,560 cy
Additional comments
for storm damage South of Clam Pass: Pass to R-43 = -700 cy
reduction benefits and North Park Shore Beach: R-43 to R-48 = 4,900 cy
cost effectiveness Park Shore Beach: R-48 to R-55 = 730 cy
Naples Beach Doctors: Pass to R-60 = -4,610 cy
Naples Beach: R-60 to R-79 = 58,720 cy
I Packet Pg. 520 1
Beach Management Funding Assistance Program
Local Government Funding Request
Fiscal Year 2025/2026
Beach Projects Application
12. Previous state commitment
Has the Department previously reviewed, approved, and cost -shared on a feasibility or design phase for this project
Has the current proposed project phase(s) received a partial state appropriation within 3 years of phase completion?F—O —1
Additional comments
13. Accessible beach area: Criteria is calculated by the Department. Provide additional information for consideration,
Describe the landward and seaward edge of the
accessible beach width
Provide the project boundaries (R-monuments)
Provide citations of reference sources
14. Recreational benefits: Provide the percentage of
linear footage within the project boundaries which
is zoned recreational or open space; for commercial
use; or to allow for public lodging establishment, or
the equivalent. Provide additional documentation
and DBPR website link in a separate attachment, if
needed.
V�.�Il R-22.300t. R�7 � U ft.fAd-o-d N-d�!aot R10og - f I �2
6 of Mom Pass R42 to RA 3 = 9 5 n of Ad—oad N�d shmall Remaining Is of $122
N� Pak Shot. 13—h R-44 to RIO - 99 It w—d N.fth—MRr" as of I R2
Park Sh— 13� R49 to R.� =IGO ft.fAd--d N-Mhoo-I R ... loing .. .1 IM
N�p1�Oe2O�R41%R-79-139R,f",,�dNmi�,tR ... r," - of I �2
Vanderbilt: R-22+300 to R-37, Park Shore: R-42 to R-54+400,
Naples: 58A to R-79, South Naples: R-79 to R-89
-------------- —
Humiston & Moore Engineers COLLIER COUNTY BEACH
NOURISHMENT PROJECT, 2021 POST -CONSTRUCTION
ANNUAL MONITORING SUMMARY
-----------
Vanderbilt 1,866 ft, 12%
Park Shore 2,544 ft, 20%
Naples 929 ft, 5%
15. Mitigation of inlet effects: Criteria is calculated by the Department.
Approximately 37,600 cy were dredged from Doctors Pass and bypassed south with
nearshore disposal of Naples Beach in 2018. Utilizing volumes from the Department's
Additional comments Annual Inlet Report (2023) the volume of inlet sand bypassing between 1997 and 2023 has
been approximately 7,335 cy/yr. Supplemental nourishment is achieved by Collier County
via beach nourishment sand placement events to mitigate for the bypassing deficit.
16. Successive unfunded requests
Is the current proposed project phase(s) a successive, unfunded request? If so, how many years of
successive request(s) is the current application?
Does the successive request add the construction phase?
K No
FPacket
Beach Management Funding Assistance Program
Local Government Funding Request
Fiscal Year 2025/2026
Beach Projects Application
17. Environmental habitat enhancement: Criteria is calculated by the Department. See Guidance Document for rnore information
Is the project within a designated critical habitat area for threatened or endangered species that is subject No
to extensive shoreline armoring? I
Is the project within a non -designated area where extensive shoreline armoring threatens the habitat of
No
threatened or endangered species?
If yes to either of the above, does the project exceed best management practices to incorporate turtle -
F
friendly designs and management strategies to protect resources or benefit critical habitat preservation?
The project proposes a dune addition.
Provide an explanation and
supporting documentation
for the strategies which
exceed best management
practices
18. Readiness to construct
Does the project have an active state permit? LesA
Permitnumber Fo331817-001-ic
Authorization date
Expiration date
Oct. 2, 2
Oct. 2, 2
Does the project have an active federal permit? Yes
Permit number I SAJ-2003-12405
Authorization date
Expiration date
lApril 6, 2016 1
I April 6, 2031 1
Have all necessary easements been acquired for the upcoming or proposed construction phase?
Has the necessary local funding been secured for the proposed project? If so, provide a copy of the
draft Resolution.
Is an Erosion Control Line established along the project length?
Additional
comments for
readiness to
construct
Packet:�g:. 5=22
Beach Management Funding Assistance Program
Local Government Funding Request
Fiscal Year 2025/2026
Beach Projects Application
Provide additional information and comments below or attach supporting documents.
I Packet Pg. 523 1
— — ?`7 — , 1 f — -- — -t
41
ru
Ar, W 0)
u
0 0
Ej Q�
m
u u
(D
N
0
>1
>
0
F= 0
ry)
ID d Lu
lot C
E
E
At 0
as .0
0 1
orl
LL
cn a
C�
LO
CN
E
ET
LU
U, z
17-
17
0 u
c
E
2m -
p E E
-b �� 8�
4
--------------------------
- (CltO)
FPacket Pg. 524
NJ
. 1ro
O)l
di
a
F
rj
fu
(U
Co
10 E
13) Cn
jq
6
co a)
a) Ln
0)
(3
Z
IN
ar
,6
0 U-
Lplu
cn
.0
U,
e k
q
Z.
r9
E-
A.-
E b E
9
aT
LR -E -E
aR-u
---------------------------------
CCA 0)
F Packet Pg. 525
.7
LE
CU
10 E
0 0) 9 eta a
(u V) '3w
ru
Z
Ak\
so
Cl
J�
ro-
4V,
Xu
CR
4
C
I rL E
Cu
LU m
fG
g7
LW
_jj '13
E2t
RA
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ZI -i r�
ZI-N,
Packet Pg.
u CL
Co
lu E
c,
In
0 0) Ln
S= a)
(V —
jo
LL
E
Cl)
PL d w
Ch
Cv Cu
S
t
CL CL
E
CIL
Li Jj
W E-
E
H--W
L 46 0
C�T B
M CLA2m
, E
E
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - �4 r�
(Z)
Packet Pg. 527
D
Im
LL
2
I
- - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
X
%
U rL 4�
U (1)
E
co 0) 0,2 i0o� ai
0 Cn n
75
LU
�-u 0
rq
CL
E
,LA >� 0 :C,
016
2 E
E 8 -p
U
a
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 4 fli
- rc�())
FPacket Pg. 528
u
M
a) Cu
ru E
cn
(1)
G
RR
� Z
::3
'd
0
U
L-
L IJ a
ru
>
0 Z
U 0
-i
cn
IL
lit d ku
In
- ml
E
C-4 Z
J2
r 0. tA
JA C 'PC
,
�;! 0
E
a-
Im,
C,
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I
zi
k I M I
I Packet Pg.��9771
17!�, -.7
ru
Cn 2
E- Co o)
, rlli7�-
, , m (1) V)
-N Cn (A 6
ru
LL
4
or\l,
A
2! ', t. ,
Cn
qv 09
IV
1 LU
OM
(LU
Ln
..........
Cc
79 S
m 6
4- 0 .9
ME E
m
r4
----------------------------------
Packet
- - - - - - - - - - - -
2
Co
(1)
::3 43) V)
8 0) tn
(u
ga
z
31
io -
IN
LL
OiC
lu
orj
01
Is
rL LE
A
S
I H
LU
gj
'eu
V) N
FL
0 v CL
x
(D E
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Packet Pg. 531
cn
41
g
ro
CD
E ca (1)
Z
ch (n
L Ll CL
z
Qj
0
0
LU
L E 2�-
U9 LT
o
v E:
E
79
a
2 E
46
z
o LL
0
FPacket Pg. 532
M
m E
C;)
21
U)
0 (n
U
U 0
LU
;5 r
E
LU
En
m
E ?t-
L9 U�
IM
lu
E
2 E
E
ri
Packet Pg. 533
:3
1:n
U-
4�
Cu
Co
(U E
0) Ch
m (D
0) U)
lu
E
u
CL
A
rq t�
y
rn
3
E
M4 >, 2:1
�i63 E
U-6 " C 6�
.rm,� � gZ5
CS
4 r4
Q
6
z
a
I Packet Pg.��477]
il — - )
7T —Zhr
IF ilk
to
41
U QJ
E
9,T i� E� 6
73 (U (1) 9 12
0
U
L)
f6
Cj
.-77-7-
i,, tj
C-4
to �A
E
Ar
LL Cn
LE
rx
rn rol
E 2-
R2
E
l.v
4
4. 0
Cu
0.0
E
M- A
L
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I �4 fli
rr 7w�
Packet Pg. 535
---- -- --j-7
1p
� E
M
0
0 u
----------------------------------
4�
U
QR
03 a)
E
0 V)
U a)
0
u
U 0
uj P,
w
m
T
.2
13
"I'll
2
E 2�
02 E
b 42
(C70)
FPacket Pg. 536
Ju
"wom
41
Ca
0 cn
Cl
41.
N M
E
IE
I
3�
........................... ............... ...... ..... ............. ...........
PIN- M"
aid I
ALI
gvg ice
4- 0
0
2 E E 2
-----------------------------
(CO
[1000g.537
Cu
V) 3
ro
%�ry
k-
10
va"
LU
Cyl
IS
rL
41
E
Cx
E
LT
E �u E
-117
E
Ll- 0
rz E
ai
----------------------------------
Packet Pg.
r iL
,imp
'APO
CL 4�
C;
U
E
Cn
E m Q)
0 Ln
-'4
2A
e"
JB';Z�
.2 -- i�
�9
T
zi
z
L
Qj
E
0
Cr
0
2:
Co
LU
Cn
Im
17L
LT_
CLJ
w
ru
LU
fl 0
4
.............................
LE
4u 's
Cn q
t
F=
2
r
lu
0 u
" 2 ro .0
— —
— — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — —
2 -tf
z
Packet Pg.
4-
m g��:j
p q,
E
T
L 1 40
-4k
7:
d�
Leu
Ou-
W
48, <
lu m
.0
........ ....
LU
2H
4- 0
-0
E-
----------------------------
Packet Pg. 540
FL
Cw
4H:
C
U
4�
fu
co u
ro
8)
q �z
a 9 ---
C: M (1)
Z3 a) U)
z
0
U
u
EL
M
Z
C)
CL
M
Lu
tu
PL
01
LT
c
�j
m
.�n
o
E:V E,
2;
.6,96
ce
A
C
ZI
LT
-- /11-�
F�acket Pg. 541
LL.
u Q)
E
sp� Z
0 0) V,
U C:
UPIJ
:31
t;n:
:17L
LLI
27
E
A2
U in
I Ch 'E
to
pu E
E? M.0 -0
-----------------------------
-- (C";O�
FFacket Pg. 542
--- -----------
- - - - - - - - - - -It
ru 41
0)
Co (L)
(3) U)
0
(D
0 76
U 0
02
.
ow
a
m
5
8
Iku
Im
LE
:iE
ru
M
tu
LU
0 1
E E
r4
r
-----------------------------------
I
__,�Il
Packet Pg.��377]
LLa,
fD 1
L
C: R
-T
CL 41
93 -r- C
U
m
Ch
E
0
2
LU
P,
it
0
A
d)
Ch
M tn
(U G
0 C
i r9
r, I—n,�
Packet Pg. 544
----------------------------------------------------
U
Ch
U�
IM
a) E
R
M Ln
0)
z
ei
"0
go
ut
4:
a)
IA
p
ro
E
Eb
M, >� 70 --r
CC
2' 6
------------------------------
(CAO)
FPacket Pg. 545
E
m Ln
aj
0
ai
d
U u
16. LL
lb
Lu d uj
ui
E So
&! j2- 2
-LU qj
r
VON -6
(0q)
L9
..g,3
4- 0
0 u
4-
tD 2
E
Effl
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - z
(CAO)
FPacket Pg. 546 1
---------------------- T --------------------------- --- I
rL r_
eA
-AA
(o t-n
c m Lr) P z
0 cn,—
LU
0
aw-
C3 u
CA
Y. 4A
I r t MU N ET
o u 2 0
cx t
CiT
-----------------------------
- Q)
FPacket Pg. 547
v
otpl' Aill
0
2
LD
- - - - - - - - - - Ob - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I
41
b E x
m En
a)
Co V)
a)
(V
_0
C
cc
IL
=o Lu
a u 2
ch
i7n
p
7�
.2
E
ME
a
C� IT
48
( 7CA �,
Packet Pg. 548
0
2
LD
- - - - - - - - - - Ob - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I
41
b E x
m En
a)
Co V)
a)
(V
_0
C
cc
IL
=o Lu
a u 2
ch
i7n
p
7�
.2
E
ME
a
C� IT
48
( 7CA �,
Packet Pg. 548
--------------
-------------
41
u a.
ra
m 0)
a) (v
m V)
'00
0 U-
0
cq
m
CL
CR
F;
m
d)
0
:E
u
CL a.
Lc"k d C'3
...... ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . ...
12
Ea
lu
AR
46 0
Lj
4-
.9 2
X
lu
- - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
(C-AO I
FPacket Pg. 549 1
yj
0 u
----------------------------------
C: �?
12 4�
u (a. r-
GJ
r_
u E
fu
m Ln
:3 w ±:!
IS, I :
_0
0
u
0 L) a
Z) S;
Ln a u III
11-u
f
r4
.p r
E5
E-
- C"-
FPacketpg. 550
..........
4- 0
O.0
----------------------------------
41
L) =
v
�we
0 cn
L) C:
U
C)
;5 V.
E
CL
cn
I
S
Si
c
A
FS
F
PI
2
lz
2 1 m
E-
0
IT 2 H
li fli
Packet Pg.��1771
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Lr
U CL
ru (U
E
0
U
A2
w IL
fL
0
ml
Im
7C
tu
.5h
23
4- 0
O.0 rA t
4- a, v
ME m
ZMa
Ca Z 2 0
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - �4
(C, � lo�
Packet Pg. 552
------ -----------------------------------------------
4�
E
a) IV
co m
aj
0
z
U
aj
>
ra
0
LL
0
7- V)
C)
0
cn
LZ
w LLJ LU
J3
eq
r=
0
m
EIg E
AD
rg
Not
2
mE
a
w
z
FPacket Pg. 553
I------------------------------------------------------
U CL C:
ai
cn
Li:
cl
CL
�v E
L
.LA
aj
>
6
D
c
in OT 0
N
nop
F—packet Pg. 554
---------------
--------------------- ------
LL
4-
u 0- r-
(13 U)
W
i2 'n �,a 0" 4)
00 U-) Z x
z
0 8 0
L)
fo 43 E
0
40
N
.2-
0
0
CL
0
Ir
0
u
IM
CD
CD
0
.2
E' u
'T
LL
to
C�
LO
CN
LU
E
d
z
.1 -D "C'
O.0 L8
4- X
2 E
E
I t K u
I z
------------------------------
- �61'-) -
FPacket Pg. iii
---- --------- ---------------------
u CL r--
b E
M Ln
w
0
U
"
a) _0
m
u U
40
LE
PL
4�,Jj U.. -J"v Ig
N'. a ECL'
fy
11 wii
igloo- - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I 4-�
FPacket Pg. 556
m
Lr
a
u
a) E
0)
fu
0 ch
U
a)
CL
Lti
in
41�
b
FL
E E
c,
c5
O.v
A
X
mE
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - -
'T
4 r4
LL
C14
ncxo
FPacket Pg. 557 1
----------------------------
ql
ff-Zl
47-4
im
4�
u
ro
fu 0)
V)
(1)
"
zz
o Ch
U 0
Jr-
.2
0
u 0
—i
0
LU
70
CL
X
fn
0 2
2 -b- 9E
Ig
E
ol
- - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - I
z
A fli
I Packet Pg.��8771
-------------------------
(13
(1) r- r=
co U
ru
(k) 12)
M V)
ai
0 0)0
_S4
0
8
40
u
Er
LT
tu
IM
rq
'i�
LT
C,
r Ln
CA
E
jA
'9
t
4- X
Iz,
- - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
FPacket Pg. 559
4�
(D E
m
CU
0 (5)
U
Lf)
C4
N
m
0
4,
E
E -2.-
M (n
A
c4
z
VON
I P(o
C" D
z
CCA'O)
FPacket Pg. 560
51
4- 0
0 L)
4- X
(ij
im 0
U
0 u m
L.) CL
0
—j
0- 0-
w Lu
Q,
E
E
LO
S
C
R
CL
3n
F-L
E.b
U-0 48
SC: CC
-OQ 15
ME m
E
LL
(CA o
FPacket Pg. 561
ir, — — — — — — — — — — - - - - - -- �rl - - - - - -
Ch
LZ
ru
M cn
0 CD
U c _r
U)
00
Ama
-AiL
AW
4L .4 1
r
LIU
IR
rL-
Qj
E-
CL
41.
C3
goo
sn u
-Eg
CFZ t
01 ----------------------------------- I
(CAO�
FPacket Pg. 562
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1
1117 1
r- m
Vft
igg
40
LL
A
"flit
IEJ
u 2
L-L
14)
P4 a.
rL
F=
O.0
4- X
--- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 2:1 �4 4
FPacket Pg. 563
'A g
am) - E
a) a)
M Ln
a) a)
o
fu
0 OL
'05
7R
LL
t7
IJITI
o-
r i,
S
Lr
0
0
u
Lu
in
c
:or-
M
J."
46 0 mE A t
Lb-
0
CML
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
FPacket
i�4
4�
ai
E
C) til
u o
Ln M
E
I KR�
j
0
0 M
1-101
>
0
oq
C.
E
cn
LE E
0
CD
G CV)
CL
0 a)
04
42 0
a Lu
M M
6 u
c
F
0
C LL
to
C�
LO
C14
LU
0 u 2> 'd
4- UT t
Sc d o w E
u
42
C3
------------------------------ I r4
FPacket Pg. 565
Mw E
u 0)
Ln
W
0 C3) 0
u C:
... . . . . . . .
CL) Lr)
m
10
aff
zr
0
o LL
>
0
.0
ui
Fq
E
E
.9 E
lwl- 0
u
T
CD
CV)
04
LT '9 0
12 G
m
fq
c cq LL
0
C14
Cc LU
E
E! z
E
u
HN w
40
ZI P:j
. 8
- - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- LAO )
FPacket Pg. 566
Zu
Cn U
CO tn
(tj a)
0
U 0
C)
ru
u U CL
LL
14
>1
LU
M 75
IT
ej 0 u a
u
IM:
IF 7
Co
(n u
uj
MA w 'm
'm oj
Kv
�E
2.2
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - z
I Packet Pg. 567
Beach Management Funding Assistance Program
Local Government Funding Request
Fiscal Year 2025/2026
Beach Projects Application
PART I: GENERAL INFORMATION
Local Sponsor I Collier County Coastal Management Program
Federal ID Number (FEID) 159-6000558 _7
Primary Contact Name FAndrew Killer Title Manager
Mailing Address Line 1 12685 South Horseshoe Drive, Unit 103
Mailing Address Line 2 1
city INaples I Zip Code r34104 Telephone Number 1239-252-2
Email Address land rew. miller@colliercountyfl.com
Additional Contact Information
PART 1111: CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that all Information provided with this application is true and complete to the best of my knowledge.
Signature of Local Sponsor I
Electronic or scanned signatures accepted
Printed Name
ATTEST
CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK
BY:
Date I
Approved as to forin and legality
Assistant County ALIC'I'lley
(CA �0
FPacket Pg. 568
Beach Management Funding Assistance Program
Local Government Funding Request
Fiscal Year 2025/2026
Beach Projects Application
PART III: EVALUATION CRITERIA
1. Project Name: (as listed in the Strategic Beach Management Plan)
South Marco Island Beach Renourishment Project
2. Project Description: include county, location with reference to DEP range monuments, brief project history, and description of
proposed activities.
The South Marco Island Beach Renourishment Project is located on the southwest Florida coastline of
Collier County between Florida Department of Environmental Protection monuments from reference
monument R-1 44 to R-1 48+600 (G-4).
The project's borrow area is the Caxambas Pass Borrow Area with upland sand mines permitted as
supplemental sand sources. Structural repair of five existing erosion control structures was completed
in 2013114.
The South Marco Island Beach Renourishment Project was then renourished through truck haul
methods in November of 2016 with approximately 13,200 cubic yards of beach compatible material to
offset storm damages caused by Tropical Storm Debby.
Approximately 80,000 cy of dredged material from Caxambas Pass W2S placed in the South Marco
Island Beach project area in March of 2020.
Additionally, emergency sand placement occurred on the dry beach in June 2023 following the passage
of Hurricane Ian.
This project includes yearly physical beach monitoring, beach tilling, and environmental monitoring as
required by FDEP and USACE permits. FIDEP staff has previously determined that 53.96% of the
project is eligible for state cost share.
Cost share for the engineering design and plans and specification creation are required in anticipation
of the 2027/2028 construction.
- � C,�,, )
F Packet Pg. 569
Beach Management Funding Assistance Program
Local Government Funding Request
Fiscal Year 2025/2026
Beach Projects Application
3. Use of Requested Program Funds: Provide a brief description of tasks to be completed in each requested phase (Feasibility,
Design, Construction, Monitoring, or USACE Multiphase). Indicate which tasks are cost reimbursement from previous fiscal years.
Monitoring - Physical and turtle monitoring and beach tilling funds.
Design - Engineering, design, plans and specifications.
4. Map: Provide as an attachment. The map(s) of the project area must be formatted at a minimum of 1 200'scale and include a
compass rose and legend.
Map elements must include:
1. Project boundary: DEP reference monuments and shoreline designated as critically eroded
2. Eligibility: Indicate lengths of eligible shoreline based on criteria outlined in Chapter 6213-36,007, F.A.C.
a. Beach access locations: indicate primary or secondary access, and include the shoreline length, number and location
of auto parking spaces, mass transit stops, bike parking spaces, and public restroom facilities within 1/4 mile walking distance
of each access
b. Public lodging establishments: include the length fronting the project shoreline, and include the length of
street -side frontage for lodging within 1/4 mile walking distance of a secondary beach access location
3. Recreational benefits: Comprehensive list of current land use designations of properties fronting the project shoreline
(see attached maps)
4. Value of upland property: Include one -quarter mile buffer and provide a comprehensive list of the values of properties
(data from year 2023) that are enclosed or intersected by the buffer. The 2023 property value tax roll data and ArcGIS
shapefiles can be obtained from the Department of Revenue website: https://floridarevenue.com/property/Pages/
Data Portal—Req uestAssessmentRolIGI SData.aspx. See Guidance Document for more information.
5. Project length; Total restored project length (in feet) of the critically eroded area
(as listed in the Strategic Beach Management Plan).
$2,729,086,034
4,130 feet
C.A.0
F Packet Pg. 570
Beach Management Funding Assistance Program
Local Government FundIng Request
Fiscal Year 2025/2026
Beach Projects Application
6. Eligibility: Required for all beach projects pursuant to Chapter 6213-36.007, F.A.C. Provide as a separate attachment, if needed.
- Location/Access Name: Use the official name of the park or road that is associated with the public access.
DEP Reference Monument: Use the DEP monument that is closest to the main public access location.
Type of Access: Indicate Primary or Secondary beach access in accordance with the definitions in Chapter 628-36, F.A.C,
Width of Access/Frontage: The length of the legal boundary (in feet) of the public access or lodging along the beach project
shoreline, For public lodging establishments that do not front the beach, indicate the street -side length of the legal property
boundary (in feet) that is used as the main access to the establishment.
Number of Eligible Units; A unit is defined as one automobile parking space, one rental unit in a public lodging establishment, one
mass transit stop, or four bicycle parking spots.
Additional Width from Eligible Units: Total distance (feet) added to the Width of Access/Frontage. If there are multiple types of
eligibility units used for this calculation, show the calculation separately for each.
Total Eligible Shoreline: Sum of the Width of Access/Frontage and Additional Width from Eligible Units columns, Eligible shorelines
cannot overlap.
Website Link for DBPR License: Provide the link to the Department of Business and Professional Regulation QBPR) website for
proof of licensure for any public lodging establishments used for eligibility or the Recreational Benefits ranking criteria.
Location/
Access Name
DEP Reference
Monument
Type of Access
Width of
Access/
Frontage (ft)
Number of
Eligible Units
Additional
Width from
EligibleUnits
(ft)
Total Eligible
Shoreline Ift)
Website Link
for DBPR
License
Marco Beach Ocean Resort
R-143
�seconclary
117
60
0
117
Hilton Marco Island Beach
R-144
JSecondary
500
320
0
500
Ciho South 13-ch Nblin &sess
R-144
Secondary
20
90
45752
47772
N/A
Marriott Crystal Sbores
R- 144.2
Secondary
362
71
0
362
d� .�
Marea Beach Vacation Suites
R-147
400
30
0
400
N/A
Swallow Ave
R-148
Secondary
20
70
31696
2,680
N/A
L-7-1-
J
CAO)
F—Packet Pg. 571
Beach Management Funding Assistance Program
Local Government Funding Request
Fiscal Year 2025/2026
Beach Projects Application
7. Schedule and Budget: Provide as a separate attachment, if needed. Clearly indicate project phase: Feasibility (F), Design (D),
Construction (C), Monitoring (M), or USACE Multiphase (USACE). Include the year of post -construction monitoring in the description.
8. Cost Reimbursement: Specify eligible costs incurred during the three years prior to the current application's fiscal year that are
not in a current DEP agreement and have not been reimbursed (this includes fiscal years 22/23, 23/24, and 24/25). Eligible costs will
be added to the current funding request.
9. Current and Future Costs: Specify eligible costs for the current application's fiscal year that are not in a current DEP agreement
and have not been reimbursed as well as the estimated costs for the next 4 years. Note: If Construction costs are requested in the .
current fiscal year, then the Year 1 Post -Construction Monitoring costs will be added to the current funding request
Fiscal
Year
Project Phase
Description
Federal Cost
State Cost
Local Cost
Total Cost
22/23
22/23
22/23
23/24
23/24
23/24
24/25
24/25
24/25
25/26
Design
Engineering Design, P&S
$0
$67,300
$182,700
$250,000
25/26
Monitoring
Physical, Turtle, Shorebird, Tilling
$0
$33,000
$89,500
$122,500
25/26
26/27
1 Monitoring
Physical, Turtle, Shorebird, Tilling
$0
$36,000
$97,500
$133,500
26/27
26/27
..... . . .... . ..... . ........... .
Packet Pg.�72J
Beach Management Funding Assistance Program
Local Government Funding Request
Fiscal Year 2025/2026
Beach Projects Application
Fiscal
Year
Project Phase
Description
Federal Cost
State Cost
Local Cost
Total Cost
27/28
Construction
Beach Nourishment and Services
$0
$673,300
$1,826�700
$2,500,000
27/28
Monitoring
Physical, Turtle, Shorebird, Tilling
$0
$39,200
$106,300
$145,500
27/28
28/29
Monitoring
Physical, Turtle, Shorebird, Tilling
$0
$42,700
$115,900
$158,600
28/29
28/29
29/30
Monitoring
Physical, Turtle, Shorebird, Tilling
$0
$46,600
$126,300
$172,900
29/30
29/30
8. Tourism -related impacts: Criteria is calculated by the Department using 2023 data. For reference, tax data can be obtained from
the Department of Revenue website: https://floridarevenue.com/DataPortal/Pages/TaxResearch.aspx See Guidance Document
for more information.
('n Current funding request includes construction and year one post -construction monitoring
('i Project is managed by two or more counties
Additional comments
Local Option Sales Tax Coll. July 2022 through June 2023= $117,092,827
Tourist Development Tax July 2022 through June 2023 = $43,656,650
Line 39 of Form 10 April 2023 through end of March 2024 = $82,393,635.83
9. Federal involvement: The documentation to verify authorization, federal cost share percentage, and status of funding award
must be provided with the application materials for the award of points.
Is the project Federally authorized by the USACE? N Eo]
Authorization Year: Expiration Year:
Does this project have a signed USACE Chief s report or Civil Works Congressional authorization for the
requested phase?
USACE federal cost share percentage for this project (excluding FCCE): 10%
I Packet Pg. 573 1
Beach Management Funding Assistance Program
Local Government Funding Request
Fiscal Year 2025/2026
Beach Projects Application
Select all that apply for the requested project phase(s) and include documentation with application materials,
(7.; Executed U5ACE project agreement
Included in USACE work plan
Approved FEMA Project Worksheet
(7. Included in Congressional Appropriations Act
(—, Other documentation:
10. Storm damage reduction benefits: Criteria is calculated by the Department.
What is the volume (cy) of advanced nourishment lost since the last sand placement event of -24,490 CY
a beach restoration or nourishment project as measured above the Mean High Water
contour? Data should be consistent with the annual post -construction monitoring reports.
For restoration projects, what is the historical erosion rate? /yr
11. Cost effectiveness: Criteria is calculated by the Department. A project design analysis and supporting documentation must be
provided with the application materials for the award of points. See Guidance Document for more information.
What is the proposed sand placement volume (cy)?
What is the nourishment interval (years)?
Select all that apply for the current project funding request:
180,000 CY
16
(7 Enhanced longevity: Propose structural or design components that could extend the beach nourishment interval
Dune addition: Incorporate new or enhanced dune structures or new or existing dune restoration and revegetation
projects
C Innovative technology: Propose innovative technologies designed to reduce project costs
Reg lona I ization: Two or more local sponsors manage projects together or projects propose regional sediment
management strategies to conserve sand resources or reduce project costs
Additional commerr
for storm damage
reduction benefits a
cost effectiveness
_0
C
0
0
.2
U
Beach Management Funding Assistance Program
Local Government Funding Request
Fiscal Year 2025/2026
Beach Projects Application
12. Previous state commitment
Has the Department previously reviewed, approved, and cost -shared on a feasibility or design phase for this project
Has the current proposed project phase(s) received a partial state appropriation within 3 years of phase completion?Ko
Additional comments
13. Accessible beach area: Criteria is calculated bythe Department. Provide additional information for consideration.
Describe the landward and seaward edge of the
accessible beach width
Provide the project boundaries (R-monuments)
Provide citations of reference sources
14. Recreational benefits: Provide the percentage of
linear footage within the project boundaries which
is zoned recreational or open space; for commercial
use; or to allow for public lodging establishment, or
the equivalent. Provide additional documentation
and DBPR website link in a separate attachment, if
needed.
The 2020 project area (R-146 to G-4) lost 29 feet between the
April 2020 (post con) and the Jan. 2022 (2-year) monitoring.
R-144 to R-148+600 (G-4)
HUMISTON & MOORE ENGINEERS (April 2022).2020 SOUTH MARCO BEACH
NOURISHMENT PROJECT, TWO-YEAR POST -CONSTRUCTION ANNUAL
MONITORING SUMMARY.
The project length is 4,130 feet. A total of 1,559 feet are
designated as commercial and recreational, therefore
37.7% of total project length.
15. Mitigation of inlet effects: Criteria is calculated by the Department.
The Marco Island project is nourished through material from Caxambas Pass
navigation dredging and meets objectives outlined in the SBMP.
Additional comments
16. S uccessive unf u ncled req uests
Is the current proposed project phase(s) a successive, unfunded request? If so, how many years of
successive request(s) is the current application?
Does the successive request add the construction phase?
L)
Packet Pg. 575
Beach Management Funding Assistance Program
Local Government Funding Request
Fiscal Year 2025/2026
Beach Projects Application
17. Environmental habitat enhancement: Criteria is calculated by the Department. See Guidance Document for more information,
Is the project within a designated critical habitat area for threatened or endangered species that is subject No
to extensive shoreline armoring?
Is the project within a non -designated area where extensive shoreline armoring threatens the habitat of
No
threatened or endangered species?
If yes to either of the above, does the project exceed best management practices to incorporate turtle -
friendly designs and management strategies to protect resources or benefit critical habitat preservation?
Provide an explanation and
supporting documentation
for the strategies which
exceed best management
practices
18. Readiness to construct
Does the project have an active state permit? Yes
Permit number 10235209-008-JM
Authorization date
Expiration date
19/27/2016
110/11/2027
Does the project have an active federal permit? Yes
Permit number I SAJ-1 996- 02789
Authorization date
Expiration date
13/9/2016
13/9/2026
Have all necessary easements been acquired for the upcoming or proposed construction phase?
Has the necessary local funding been secured for the proposed project? If so, provide a copy of the
draft Resolution.
Is an Erosion Control Line established along the project length?
Additional
comments for
readiness to
construct
I Packet Pg. 576 1
Beach Management Funding Assistance Program
Local Government Funding Request
Fiscal Year 2025/2026
Beach Projects Application
Provide additional information and comments below or attach supporting documents.
I Packet Pg. 577 1
I,-
4— 0
0 u
4&1 -------------------------
ol
WE
ua
Z
j 4�
0
L)
L
>
U
0
,10
tL
z
0
LU
jc�
'Z3
Q)
2.
E
Is 2-
E
v
C LT
E
8
di A
L3
-An
0
C CL
VC!
E
L9
AD lu
E 0
r
20
E
Packet Pg. 578
2M
U
m
(1) ro zi
Co
. A NpA -.
(D
ro
OF
LL
Cq
Or\
a
;5
C 0- CL
tu LU
>,
E 13
,p w
uri
4ai
m q5
'u -6 (q)
ED
jh 7or
FL
E
E
Mn >,
w
E
o
CU 2 2
i �4
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Packet
� I-=
U
ai
cn
Q) 1=
L V)
409
g An
NO
12
E
N 0.
Pr
o
FL
E
p
An u
M lu w
46
ch
B
2 E
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - -
zi
C,4
FPacket Pg. 580 1
�I.m
----- ------- -------- --------
u a-
(u
8 4�
0
u
40-
a LL
rr
LLJ M
a u 0
L� LU LL
PL c
u
PL
m
C-4
C
Ln >,
----------
- (0,10)
FPacket Pg. 581
- ------------------- --------------------
ro
MIU
E
m
w
ir -
(D
04
CA
CD
E
E
0
Lu
LE
Cl)
cu C)
'M CN
m CL
0 u 2
A
0
44 u
L.
w
ca
0,
cl
w E
N i3l
u
(D
LL
2'r
o o
FL C�
F= LO
C14
0
.3E u
cl (w)
�4 r4
FPacket Pg. 582
Beach Management Funding Assistance Program
Local Government Funding Request
Fiscal Year 2025/2026
Inlet Projects Application
PART 1: GENERAL INFORMATION
Local Sponsor I Collier County Coastal Management Program
Federal ID Number (FEID) 159-6000558 =71
Title FManager
Primary Contact Name AndrewKiller
F
Mailing Address Line 1 12685 South Horseshoe Drive, Unit 103
Mailing Address Line 2 1
City JNap[es ZipCode 34104 Telephone Number
i F 1239-252-2922
Email Address I andrew.miller@colliercountyfl.com
Additional Contact Information
PART II: CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that all information provided with this application is true and complete to the best of my knowledge.
Signature of Local Sponsor I I
0ectronic or scanned signo tures accepted.
Printed Name Date
ATTEST
CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK
BY:
Approved as to form and legality
q7— �Assistant Cou�nty At�tomeY��
FIRacket Pg. 583
Beach Management Funding Assistance Program
Local Government Funding Request
Fiscal Year 2025/2026
Inlet Projects Application
PART III: EVALUATION CRITERIA
1. Project Name: As listed in the Inlet Management Plan (IMP) or Strategic Beach Management Plan (SBMP)
Wiggins Pass Inlet Management
2. Project Description: Include county, location with reference to DEP range monuments, brief project history, and description of
proposed activities.
The Wiggins Pass Project is located on the southwest Florida coastline in Collier County between
FIDEP monuments R-1 6 and R-1 7.
The initial phase of the latest Inlet Management Plan Study was implemented in 2013 for maintenance
dredging and initial realignment of the channel.
In 2015, an interim maintenance dredging project cleared the shoal across the main inlet entrance
channel. Material was placed in the ebb shoal disposal area north of the channel and within the flood
shoal disposal.
In Spring 2018, dredging split 2/3 of the total volume to the north and 1/3 of the total volume to the
south to maintain the navigation of the inlet, refine and reinforce the alignment begun with the 2013
project.
In March 2020 the County conducted a small interim dredging project, but due to storms since this
project completion, the County needed an emergency dredging project to remove shoals that impeded
navigation. As such, Wiggins Pass was dredged between January 26, 2022 and March 10, 2022.
The County anticipates conducting a full channel dredging in 2025/2026.
The requested funds are for construction, permitting and monitoring. FIDEP staff have determined that
the project is eligible for a 50% state cost share.
I Packet Pg. 584 1
Beach Management Funding Assistance Program
Local Government Funding Request
Fiscal Year 2025/2026
Inlet Projects Application
3. Use of Requested Program Funds: Provide a brief description of tasks to be completed in each requested phase (Feasibility,
Designr Construction, or Monitoring). indicate which tasks are cost reimbursement from previous fiscal years,
The requested funds are for construction, permitting and monitoring. No requests from previous years
4. Map: Provide as an attachment.
Format: The project area must be formatted at a minimum of I 200'scale and include a compass rose and legend.
Required elements: Project boundary, DEP reference monuments, shoreline designated as critically eroded, area of inlet
influence, and permitted sand bypassing placement area
5. Project length: Total restored project boundary (in feet) as listed in the IMP or SBMP. F10,560 feet
6. Schedule and Budget: Provide as a separate attachment, if needed, Clearly indicate project phase: Feasibility (F), Design (D),
Construction (C), or Monitoring (M). Include the year of post -construction monitoring in the description.
7. Cost Reimbursement: Specify eligible costs incurred during the three years prior to the current application's fiscal year that are
not in a current DEP agreement and have not been reimbursed (this includes fiscal years 22/23, 23/24, and 24/25). Eligible costNvill
be added to the current funding request.
8. Current and Future Costs- Specify eligible costs for the current application's fiscal year that are not in a current DEP agreement
and have not been reimbursed as well as the estimated costs for the next 4 years. Note: If Construction costs are requested in the
current fiscal year, then the Year I Post -Construction Monitoring costs will be added to the current funding request.
Fiscal
Year
Project Phase
Description
Federal Cost
State Cost
Local Cost
Total Cost
22/23
22/23
22/23
23/24
23/24
23/24
I Packet Pg.
Beach Management Funding Assistance Program
Local Government Funding Request
Fiscal Year 2025/2026
Inlet Projects Application
Fiscal
Year
Project Phase
Description
Federal Cost
State Cost
LocalCost
Total Cost
24/25
24/25
i
1
24/25
25/26
Construction
Full Channel Dredging Construction
$0
$800,000
$800,000
$1,600,000
25/26
Permitting
Permitting
$0
$50,000
$50,000
$100,000
2S/26
Monitoring
Environmental & Physical Monitoring, and Tilling
$0
$60,000
$60,000
$120,000
26/27
Design
Interim Dredging Design
$0
$75,000
$75,000
$150,000
26/27
Monitoring
Environmental & Physical Monitoring, and Tilling
$0
$65,500
$65,500
$131,000
26/27
27/28
Construction
Interim Dredging Design
$0
$400,000
$400,000
$800,000
27/28
Monitoring
Environmental & Physical Monitoring, and Tilling
$0
$71,400
$71,400
$142,800
27/28
28/29
Design
Full Channel Dredge Design
$0
$84,000
$84,000
$168,000
28/29
Monitoring
Environmental & Physical Monitoring, and Tilling
$0
$78,000
$78,000
$156,000
28/29
29/30
Construction
Full Channel Dredging Construction
$0
$900,400
$900,400
$1,800,800
29/30
Monitoring
Environmental & Physical Monitoring, and Tilling
$0
$67,500
$67,500
$135,000
F29/30
F�acket Pg. 586
Beach Management Funding Assistance Program
Local Government Funding Request
Fiscal Year 2025/2026
Inlet Projects Application
7. Sand reaching the inlet
Provide the estimated annual quantity (cubic yards) of beach quality sand reaching the 20,600 cubic yards per year.
updrift boundary of the improved jetty or inlet channel:
8. Severity of erosion
Provide the annual bypassing objective (cubic yards/year) adopted by the IMP or S8MP or 20,600cy/yr (1/3 south,2/3 north)
as determined by a Department -approved study;
9. Balancing the sediment budget
Provide the current annual average of bypassed material (cubic yards) since the adoption 40,225 cy since 2018
of a bypass objective:
Provide a brief description of when the last
sediment budget engineering analysis was
completed for the inlet and area of inlet
influence. Discuss any proposals to update
the sediment budget,
Dredging:
2011, 49,900 cy removed from Wiggins Pass.
2013, 107,370 cy removed from Wiggins Pass
2015, 9,400 cy removed from Wiggins Pass and channel.
2018, 96,000 cy removed from Wiggins Pass and channel.
2020, 48,041 cy removed from Wiggins Pass.
2022, 66,033 cy removed from Wiggins Pass and channel.
The 1995 Inlet Management Study and corresponding strategic beach
management plan was implemented starting in 2001.
A new study was completed in 2012, permitted and initiated in 2013, FIDEP
approved the final plan in April 2018.
Since adoption, the bypassing objectives have been met.
FIRacket Pg. 587
Beach Management Funding Assistance Program
Local Government Funding Request
Fiscal Year 2025/2026
Inlet Projects Application
Historical bypassing volumes: In the table below, provide the annual bypassing volumes (cubic yards/year), for the previous ten
years (from the last calendar year or the most recent calculation). Attach additional documentation as needed.
Year
Quantity Bypassed
(cy) - Sand Transfer
Plant
Quantity Bypassed
(cy) - Dredging
Dredge Location
Placement or Disposal Area
2012
2013
661064
Ebb Shoal (rernaining dredged material not bypassed)
R1 2-R1 6
2014
201S
93400
Ebb Shoal and Interior Channel
R1 5.5-R1 6
2016
2017
2018
531396
Ebb Shoal and Interior Channel
R1 2-R1 4
2019
2020
481041
Ebb Shoal
R12-R14 and R18-R20
2021
2022
66,033
Ebb Shoal and Interior Channel
R1 8 and R20
2023
Total per
method
0
242)934
Total bypass volume:
Years since IMP adoption
Annual average bypass:
Bypass objective
242,934 cy
6 years (201
40,489cy/yr
20,600 cy/yr
Percentage of bypass objective:1 196.55% ( SO
FPacket Pg. 5 ig
Beach Management Funding Assistance Program
Local Government Funding Request
Fiscal Year 2025/2026
Inlet Projects Application
10. Increased bypassing and cost-effectiveness
Provide the estimated increase in annual bypassing of sand (cubic None proposed at this time
yards/year) proposed for the project:
Provide the estimated shortfall of annual bypassing of sand (cubic None
yards/year) within the inlet system:
Is the proposed project requesting construction phase funds for a major inlet management project component?
If yes, and for the award of points for the cost-effectiveness of using inlet sand criteria, provide an opinion of probable cost
per unit volume of the inlet and all other sand sources, certified by a licensed professional engineer.
11. Inlet Management Plans
Select all that apply:
61 Existing IMP: The proposed project has an existing IMP or completed Inlet Management Study that
has been approved by the Department.
Updated IMP: The Department has received and approved an update to an existing IMP in the
C' form of a current Inlet Management Study/sediment budget analysis within the previous five years,
or there is an update proposed to an existing IMP in the current application,
New IMP: A new inlet management study is proposed for submission to the Department for an
adoption in an IMP.
12. Enhanced longevity of proximate beach nourishment projects
Annualized beach nourishment volume of proximate beach
nourishment project;
13. Active permits
Does the project have an active state permit?
Yes
Permit number: OF142538-015-JN
Authorization date: 1/2/2013
Expiration date: 1/2/2028
57, 910 cy/yr
Does the project have an active federal permit? Yes I
Permit number:
Authorization date:
Expiration date:
C
SAJ-2004-07621 (IP-MJD) 0
1 E
U
2/13/2013
F2/1 3/2025
FPacket Pg. 589
Beach Management Funding Assistance Program
Local Government Funding Request
Fiscal Year 2025/2026
Inlet Projects Application
14. Federal funds available
Does the proposed project have federal funds available? If so, provide supporting documentation
15. Secured local funds
Has the necessary local funding been secured for the proposed project? If so, provide a copy of the
draft Resolution.
Additional
comments
----- ---------------- ----- -----------------------
L
En
Co U Ln
m ro
ie,F�9�
2
(Ij a-
Lf)
T
75
0
U.9
10
.9
0
0 0
E :.0
LT
2L
Ln
Qj >
os
Rm 7E
E
4-
---------------------------------
Packet Pg. 591
/ " 0., �,
Packet Pg. 592
lit
I
Z
LU
m
o
rq
N
'?j E E
E-
E
e
Aa
0 LL
0
C-4
ra, n
Packet Pg. 593
- - - - - -
- - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - -
Lr
G
,
40
0
m
Ln
u
E
m
Qj
0
ly
dL CL
LLI Lu
0 -f2
ol
00
Ci
1
E t E
9,9
2-.
55
-0
Lo
lip
- - -
- - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - -
Packet Pg.
4- 0
Q.0
---------------------------------
u
M
U Ln
0 Ova
U c:
L
75 M
u
C:� LL
CD
7-
T,
0
0
CL 0-
LU
0
CL
E
M
L Su
N
FPacketpg. 595
--------------------
P
ell.
I
rrrrrr ;JAC- GI
55
co
L)
0
j-w
44
-4Z 1 A t",
4N;A
ip
LL
ZI :
LU LU
LL
2 E
fq
ME
.0
F
J9
cx I
0 Ip 3c;
Of
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
FFacket Pg. 596