The URL can be used to link to this page

HEX Agenda 06/13/2024COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Hearing Examiner AGENDA Growth Management Department Conference Rooms 609/610 2800 Horseshoe Drive North Naples, FL 34104 June 13, 2024 9: 00 AM Andrew W. J. Dickman, Esq., AICP Hearing Examiner Note: Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes unless otherwise waived by the Hearing Examiner. Persons Wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the hearing report packets must have that material submitted to County staff at Ailyn.Padron(a)CollierCountyFL.gov 10 days prior to the Hearing. All materials used during presentation at the hearing will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Hearing Examiner will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto, and therefore may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Decisions of the Hearing Examiner are final unless appealed to the Board of County Commissioners. Hearing Procedures will provide for presentation by the Applicant, presentation by staff, public comment and applicant rebuttal. The Hearing Examiner will render a decision within 30 days. Persons wishing to receive a copy of the decision by mail may supply County staff with their name, address, and a stamped, self-addressed envelope for that purpose. Persons wishing to receive an electronic copy of the decision may supply their email address. Collier County Hearing Examiner Page I Printed 61612024 June 2024 Pledge of Allegiance 2. Review of Agenda 3. Advertised Public Hearing A. PETITION NO. BD-PL20230008897 —148 Seabreeze Avenue - Request to allow the construction of a boathouse to be located upon a lawfully permitted boat dock for which the roof overhang will extend 3 feet beyond the maximum permitted protrusion of 20 feet for boat dock facilities on waterways 100 feet or greater in width pursuant to Section 5.03.06.F of the Land Development Code. The subject property is located at 148 Seabreeze Avenue, also known as Lot 21, Block D, Conner's Vanderbilt Beach Estates Unit No. 1, in Section 29, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: John Kelly, Planner III] Commission District 2 B. PETITION NO. BD-PL20230002187 —159 Tahiti Street - Request for a boathouse and a 10- foot boat dock extension over the maximum permitted protrusion of 20 feet for waterways greater than 100 feet in width, to allow construction of a boat dock facility and boathouse protruding a total of 30 feet into a waterway that is 149 feet wide. The subject property is located at 159 Tahiti Street, also known as Lot 285, Isles of Capri No. 2, in Section 32, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: John Kelly, Planner III] Commission District 5 C. PETITION NO. PDI PL20240000770 — Hammock Park Development, LLC - Collier Boulevard and Rattlesnake Hammock Road - requests an insubstantial change to the Hammock Park MPUD, Ordinance 07-30, as amended, for one deviation from the required parking for a multi -tenant commercial building, pursuant to Land Development Code (LDC) Section 4.05.04.G, Table 17, not meeting the LDC shopping center threshold, to be calculated based on the square footage of each use, to allow instead the parking for a multi - tenant commercial building containing a minimum of seven (7) tenants/units and a minimum floor area of at least 15,000 square feet to be calculated as a shopping center (e.g., at one (1) space per 250 square feet), pursuant and subject to LDC Section 4.05.04.G, Table 17, Shopping Center. The subject 2.75 +/- acre parcel is part of the 19.13 +/- acre MPUD and is located at the northeast corner of Collier Boulevard and Rattlesnake Hammock Road in Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida [Coordinator: Timothy Finn, Planner 111] Commissioner District 1 D. PETITION NO. PDI-PL20230016103 - Hacienda Lakes - Request for an insubstantial change to the Hacienda Lakes Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (RPUD), Ordinance No. 11-41, as amended, to decrease the minimum floor area size from 750 square feet to 650 square feet for multi -family dwelling units; and to remove the temporary 3:00 P.M. peak hour trip cap at the connection to Collier Boulevard by adding the following sentence to Transportation Commitment IV, "Upon the commitment of construction of Benfield Road [now known as Hacienda Blvd] for connectivity inn the north area, this restriction shall no longer be in effect." The subject f20-acre parcel is part of the f2,262-acre PUD; and sits on the east side of Collier Boulevard approximately 2,500 feet north of Hacienda Lakes Parkway in Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East in unincorporated Collier County. [Coordinator: Eric Ortman, Planner III] Commissioner District 1 4. Other Business Collier County Hearing Examiner Page 2 Printed 61612024 June 2024 5. Public Comments 6. Adjourn Collier County Hearing Examiner Page 3 Printed 61612024 3.A 06/13/2024 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Hearing Examiner Item Number: 3.A Doc ID: 29031 Item Summary: PETITION NO. BD-PL20230008897 — 148 Seabreeze Avenue - Request to allow the construction of a boathouse to be located upon a lawfully permitted boat dock for which the roof overhang will extend 3 feet beyond the maximum permitted protrusion of 20 feet for boat dock facilities on waterways 100 feet or greater in width pursuant to Section 5.03.06.F of the Land Development Code. The subject property is located at 148 Seabreeze Avenue, also known as Lot 21, Block D, Conner's Vanderbilt Beach Estates Unit No. 1, in Section 29, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: John Kelly, Planner III] Commission District 2 Meeting Date: 06/13/2024 Prepared by: Title: Planner — Zoning Name: John Kelly 05/28/2024 11:03 AM Submitted by: Title: Zoning Director — Zoning Name: Mike Bosi 05/28/2024 11:03 AM Approved By: Review: Growth Management Community Development Department Diane Lynch Operations & Regulatory Management Diane Lynch GMCDD Reviewer Unknown Jaime Cook GMCDD Reviewer Operations & Regulatory Management Michael Stark Review Item Hearing Examiner (GMD Approvers) David Merino Review Item Zoning Ray Bellows Review Item Zoning James Sabo Review Item Zoning Mike Bosi Division Director Hearing Examiner Andrew Dickman Meeting Pending GMD Approver Skipped 05/28/2024 3:37 PM Skipped 05/29/2024 12:13 PM Completed 06/03/2024 6:48 AM Completed 06/03/2024 12:23 PM Completed 06/03/2024 12:43 PM Completed 06/03/2024 1:48 PM Skipped 06/04/2024 4:20 PM Completed 06/05/2024 2:54 PM 06/13/2024 9:00 AM Packet Pg. 4 3.A.a -e Collier County STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FROM: ZONING DIVISION — ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: JUKE 13, 2024 SUBJECT: BD-PL20230008897, 148 SEABREEZE AVENUE — BOATHOUSE PROPERTY OWNER/APPLICANT: AGENT: Brandon M. Baker and Maria Vassilev-Baker 148 Seabreeze Ave Naples, FL 34108 REQUESTED ACTION: Mark Oreus Greg Orick II Marine Construction, Inc 3710 Prospect Ave. Naples, FL 34104 The petitioner requests to allow the construction of a 24-foot by 50-foot boathouse which will be M located upon a lawfully permitted boat dock, for which the roof overhang will extend three feet N beyond the maximum permitted protrusion of 20 feet for boat dock facilities on waterways 100 feet or greater in width, pursuant to Section 5.03.06.F of the Land Development Code (LDC). GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is located at 148 Seabreeze Avenue, also known as Lot 21, Block D, Conner's Vanderbilt Beach Estates Unit No. 1, in Section 29, Township 48 South, Range 25 East. Collier County, Florida. (See location map on the following page) PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The subject property comprises 0.22 acres located within a Single-Family-3 (RSF-3) Zoning District; said property has not been homesteaded. The subject boathouse is to be constructed over a dock that is presently under construction as per Building Permit No. PRMAR20230309503, issued on March 20, 2023, for which inspections have not yet commenced. As per LDC Section 5.03.061.2 the maximum protrusion for a boathouse is 25 percent of canal width or 20 feet, whichever is less; however, the roof alone may overhang no more than three feet into the waterway beyond the maximum protrusion and/or side setbacks. The boathouse will be constructed within the required 15-foot side setbacks and will be 15 feet high measured from the top of the seawall. Page 1 of 5 Packet Pg. 5 3.A.a i, AVE PROJECT LOCATION �~ � l 100th AVEN Sa i e 9171th AVEN iiiiTUM PineAVE 96th AVEN A &C IL Il Tir xT Location Map CROWN O MOTEL ANDERBILT AY CONDO Su6MER6E0 PH II uu°�Ewse oreasoeisn 45 21,10a fyl wel RT73RTO 44 Q ®v 24 25 �76 25 VANDERBILT Q BAY CONDO PH 1 d3 93 y�ccs� 35 as 37 3e SITE do 37 LOCATION 41 39 38 O p 41 40 25 dz AVEv4Uf- 2a SF�'gSiE'E� 22 � p za D 19 27 7a 6 97 18 18 19 17 RSF-3 e 7 72 11 10 0 9Q O 14 18 11 70 is p 14 73 12 GHA4dfS L lopNS 22 23 2° 21C 23 11a 19 z1 If, 17 18 79 20 17 Q C 1a is Petition Number: PL20230008897 Zoning Map Page 2 of 5 Packet Pg. 6 3.A.a SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: North: Seabreeze Avenue (Right -of -Way) then a Single-family dwelling in a Residential Single-Family-3 (RSF-3) Zoning District East: Single-family dwelling in a Residential Single-Family-3 (RSF-3) Zoning District South: Canal then a Single-family dwelling in a Residential Single-Family-3 (RSF-3) Zoning District West: Single-family dwelling in a Residential Single-Family-3 (RSF-3) Zoning District Aerial — Collier County GIS ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION: M O M N Environmental Planning Staff has reviewed this petition and has no objection to the granting of this request. The property is located adjacent to Vanderbilt Lagoon. The proposed docking facilities will be constructed waterward of the existing seawall. The shoreline does not contain native vegetation. A submerged resources survey provided by the applicant found no submerged resources in the area 200 feet beyond the proposed docking facility. This project does not require an Environmental Advisory Council Board (EAC) review, because this project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Chapter 2, Article VIII, Division 23, Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. Page 3 of 5 Packet Pg. 7 3.A.a STAFF ANALYSIS: In accordance with LDC Section 5.03.06.F., the Collier County Hearing Examiner shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny a Boathouse request based on certain criteria. Boathouses, including any roofed structure built on a dock, shall be reviewed by the Hearing Examiner according to the following criteria, all of which must be met in order for the Hearing Examiner to approve the request. Boathouse Criteria: 1. Minimum side setback requirement: Fifteen Feet. Criterion met: As per the submitted site plan, the boathouse will provide a 15-foot side yard/riparian setback on both the east and west sides. 2. Maximum protrusion into waterway: Twenty-five percent of canal width or 20 feet, whichever is less. The roof alone may overhang no more than 3 feet into the waterway beyond the maximum protrusion and/or side setbacks. Criterion met. The dock facility has a maximum protrusion of 20 feet, and the 3- foot roof overhang is allowable pursuant to LDC Section 5.03.06.17.2; therefore, the actual boathouse will protrude 23 feet into the waterway. 3. Maximum height: Fifteen feet as measured from the top of the seawall or bank, whichever is more restrictive, to the peak or highest elevation of the roof. r Criterion met: The proposed height is 15 feet above the seawall. N 4. Maximum number of boathouses or covered structures per site: One. Criterion met. Only one boathouse is to be built on this property. 5. All boathouses and covered structures shall be completely open on all four sides. Criterion met. The boathouse will be open on all four sides. 6. Roofing material and roof color shall be the same as materials and colors used on the principal structure or may be of a palm frond "chickee" style. A single- family dwelling unit must be constructed on the subject lot prior to, or simultaneously with, the construction of any boathouse or covered dock structure. Criterion met. The roofing material and color of the proposed boathouse will match that of the existing single-family residence serving as the principal structure at this location. Page 4 of 5 Packet Pg. 8 3.A.a 7. The boathouse or covered structure must be so located as to minimize the impact on the view of the adjacent neighbors to the greatest extent practical. Criterion met. The boathouse is located within the required side/riparian setbacks and is consistent with other similar facilities along the subject shoreline. Staff finds that this petition satisfies all seven of the required boathouse criteria. CONCURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS: There are no known concurrent land use petitions. APPEAL OF BOAT DOCK EXTENSION: As to any boat dock extension petition upon which the Hearing Examiner takes action, an aggrieved petitioner may appeal such final action. Such appeal shall be filed per Section 2-88 of the Collier County Code of Ordinances within 30 days of the Decision by the Hearing Examiner. An aggrieved non-party may appeal a decision of the Hearing Examiner to the Circuit Court of Collier County within 30 days of the decision. In the event that the petition has been approved by the Hearing Examiner, the applicant shall be advised that he/she proceed with construction at his/her own risk during this 30-day period. Any construction work completed ahead of the approval authorization shall be at their own risk. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Hearing Examiner APPROVE Petition BD-PL20230008897 to allow r for the permitting of the proposed boathouse as depicted within Attachments A and B, subject to the following conditions: 1. A Certificate of Completion cannot be obtained for the boathouse until after a Certificate of Completion has been issued for the underlying dock; Permit No. PRMAR20230309503. 2. The petitioner proceeds at their own risk if construction of the boathouse commences before the issuance of a Certificate of Completion for the dock. Attachments: A. Boathouse Plans B. Specific Purpose Survey C. Building Permit No. PRMAR20230309503 D. Applicant's Backup; Application and Supporting Documents E. Public Hearing Sign Posting Page 5 of 5 Packet Pg. 9 3.A.b C REG ORICK MARINE CONSTRUCTION, INC. (2239) 949-5588 50' 80' Property Width Name: Brandon Baker Address: 148 Seabreeze Ave Naples, FL 34108 Date: 5/11/2023 Approved Signature: Approved Date: Packet Pg. 10 1 3.A.b C REG ORICK MARINE CONSTRUCTION, INC. (2239) 949-5588 Name: Brandon Baker Address: 148 Seabreeze Ave Naples, FL 34108 Date: 12/13/2023 To Be Same As House :k Approved Signature: Approved Date: c �7 Packet Pg. 11 1 SCALE: 1" 40' 36 38 37 WATERWAY PREPARED FOR: BRANDON BAKER 3.A.c DATE OF FIELD SURVEY: FEBRUARY 22, 2023 AGNOU, BARBER & BRUNDAGE, INC. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS, PLANNERS & SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS sgned by Wayne D. A9noli, R. S. M. BY__ g"II"abbinc.— DN=RNayne D. Wayne i� noTi�F R. S. M.', 0='A9�di, Barba,& ge, Inc", L=Naples. S=Flodda, C=US 923.g2.2] 11:95:11-05'Og' WAYNE D. AGNOU, R.S.M., NO. 5335 DATE THIS SITE PLAN SURVEY MEETS THE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE SET FORTH BY THE FLORIDA BOARD OF LAND SURVEYORS IN CHAPTER 5J-17, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. PURSUANT TO SECTION 472.027. FLORIDA STATUTES THIS SITE PLAN SURVEY IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF THE FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS TO SURVEY MAPS OR REPORTS BY OTHER THAN THE SIGNING PARTIES WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE SIGNING PARTY OR PARTIES IS PROHIBITED BY CHAPTER 5J-17 FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. THIS SITE PLAN SURVEY IS CERTIFIED AS TO THE DATE OF FIELD SURVEY, N THE SIGNATURE DATE. GENERAL NOTES: 1. DIMENSIONS ARE IN FEET AND DECIMALS THEREOF. 2. BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE FLORIDA STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTI EAST ZONE, NAD 83/90 DATUM AND REFERENCED TO THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 21, BLOCK D, CONNERS VANDERBILT BCH. EST., UNI SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS BEING SOUTH 79' 29' 23" WEST. 3_HORIZONTAL COORDINATES WERE DERIVED BY CPS OBSERVATIONS USING A TRIMBLE DUAL FREQUENCY RECEIVER (MODEL R10), RECEIVING CORRECTION FROM TRIMBLE VRS NOW RTN (REAL TIME NETWORK) 4. VERTICAL: ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON THE NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DI OF 1988 (NAVD 88).ELEVATIONS WERE ESTABLISHED USING LONG TERM OBSERVATIONS WITH A TRIMBLE (MODEL R10) DUAL FREQUENCY RECEIVER (GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM). SURVEYOR'S NOTE: THE PURPOSE OF THE SURVEY IS TO LOCATE THE SEA AND THE WATERWARD EXISTING CONDITIONS ONLY. NO OTHER IMPROVEMENT HAVE BEEN LOCATED UNDER THE SCOPE OF THIS SURVEY. 148 SEABREEZE AVE. SPECIFIC PURPOSE SURVEY tor. BRANDON BAKER deaigl CONNER'S VANDERBILT BEACH ESTATES, UNIT N0. 1 SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH a RANGE 25 EAST (PLAT BOOK 3 a PAGE 91 .... 12^ ! 1 FEBRUP 0 GNOLI �� scale: uu 11111;;appRBER & cogo #:1 11ORUNDAGE,- D9 Prdess i Fey—' P. — Lend surveyors a —scaca Annn��s T. c.mn�ma,aw.eo„�.�axw,saxwa.amooexa r....a�� s peo-s� NI ATERW AY 3.A.0 I 148 SEABREEZE AVE. PROPOSED BOATHOUSE tor. BRANDON BAKER CONNER5 VANDERBILT BEACH ESTATES, UNIT N0. 1 SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP dS SOUTH & RANGE 25 EAST (PLAT BOOK 3 & PAGE 91 � XXX X%X PEBR oil Ui ��NOLI scale: ;;�AARBER& cogo#:� M-1-11BRUNDAGE,T. 04 Professional s,ym, Pia, Cana surveyors a �anascaca a,rnn�� m rn O t r O m L d m C. Q N N L M co 00 m 00 00 O O O M N O N J a 3.A.d COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PERMIT PERMIT #: PRMAR2023030950301 PERMIT TYPE: Marine DATE ISSUED: March 20, 2023 BUILDING CODE IN EFFECT: FBC 7th Edition 2020 w/ 2022 sup2 JOB ADDRESS: 148 Seabreeze AVE, Naples FOLIO #: JOB DESCRIPTION: Install 389 Sq Ft Dock + Lifts 148 Seabreeze AVE, Naples OWNER INFORMATION: BAKER, BRANDON M MARIA VASSILEV-BAKER 196 RESERVE ROAD HOPEWELL, NJ 08525 SETBACKS: FRONT: REAR: LEFT: RIGHT: FLOOD ZONE: AE SEWER: WATER: CONTRACTOR INFORMATION: CERTIFICATE #: GREG ORICK II MARINE CONSTRUCTION, INC C28961 1035 COLLIER CENTER WAY #1 NAPLES, FL 34110 (239) 289-0792 SUB CONTRACTOR INFORMATION: A GREG ORICK MARINE CONSTRUCTION INC. 27171 DRIFTWOOD DRIVE BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 (239) 289-0792 PRMAR20230309: 1 Packet Pg. 14 3.A.d PRMAR20230309 INSPECTION JOB CARD To schedule inspections call 239-252-3726 or visit https://cvportal.colliercountyfl.gov/cityviewweb FRONT: REAR: LEFT: RIGHT: 777L: FLOOD FZAE ZONE: INSPECTIONOUTCOME COMMENTS 115 - Building Final 502 - Electrical Final 506 - Underground Electrical Conduit 810 - Exotic Vegetation Removal OPEN CONDITIONS Condition Condition Notice of Commencement: Upload to the condition on the portal. Inspection Hold NOTE: If you are unable to schedule your inspection, please contact the inspection desk at 252-2400. NOISE ORDINANCE: Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances 54-92(f) Construction Sound. NOISE LIMITATIONS: in effect at all times. Work permitted, RESIDENTIAL Areas — 6:30 AM to 7:00 PM Monday thru Saturday; NON-RESIDEN' Areas (more than 500 feet from Residential Area) 6:OOAM to 8:OOPM Monday thru Saturday. No Work on Sundays or Holida RADIOS, LOUDSPEAKERS, ETC. — Must not disturb peace, quiet and comfort of neighboring inhabitants. FREE CABLE LOCATIONS — Call 48 Hours prior to digging/FPL 434-1222/UTS 1-800-542-0088/PalmerCATV 783-0638 and all other appli utilities. Per currently adopted building code ordinance, as it may be amended, all work must comply with all applicable laws, codes, ordinances, and any additional stipulations or conditions of this permit. This permit expires if work authorized by the permit commenced within six (6) months from the date of issuance of the permit. Additional fees for failing to obtain permits prior to commencement of construction may be imposed. Permittee(s) further understands that any contractor that may be employed be a licensed contractor and that the structure must not be used or occupied until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued. NOTICE: PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OF ASBESTOS PRODUCTS OR THE DEMOLITION OF A STRUCTURE, FEDE] AND STATE LAWS REQUIRE THE PERMITTEE (EITHER THE OWNER OR CONTRACTOR) TO SUBMIT A NOTIC] THE INTENDED WORK TO THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (DEP). FOR MORE INFORMATION, CONTACT DEP AT (239) 344-5600. NOTICE: In addition to the conditions of this permit, there may be additional restrictions applicable to this property that ma; found in the public records of this county, and there may be additional permits required from other governmental entities suc water management districts, state agencies, or federal agencies. WARNING TO OWNER: YOUR FAILURE TO RECORD A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MAY RESULT IN YOUR PAYING TWICE FOR IMPROVEMEN TO YOUR PROPERTY. A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MUST BE RECORDED AND POSTED ON THE JOB SITE BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION. IF YOU INTE TO OBTAIN FINANCING, CONSULT WITH YOUR LENDER OR AN ATTORNEY Packet Pg. 15 3.A.d BEFORE RECORDING YOUR NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. PRMAR20230309: Packet Pg. 16 coler County Growth Management Department INSTRUCTIONS FOR BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATI 2800 N. HORSESHOE DRIVE, NAPLES, FL 34104 (239) 252-2400 These Instructions are designed to assist and guide Permittees with completing the Building Permit Application. For your convenience, the Application is also available on http://www.colliercountyfl.gov as an interactive PDF. All sections, as noted, must be completed. A.1. Permit #: To be completed by Staff. Instructions for Section B. General Permit Information B.1. Primary Permit #: To be completed by the applicant, if applicable. i.e., the single-family home permit is the PRIMARY PERMIT for an accessory pool permit. B.2. Master Permit #: To be completed by the applicant, if applicable. A MASTER PERMIT is a set of documents pre -approved by the County to use for future permits. B.3. Building Type: Select one of the five options. SectionInstructions for •. C.1. Parcel/Folio #: These can be found on the Collier County Property Appraiser website: http://www.collierappraiser.com. C.2. Job Street Address: This is the physical address where the construction work will take place. C.3. Owner Name: Name of the property owner where the construction work will take place. C.4. Owner Phone: Phone number of the property owner where the construction work will take place. C.5. Owner Email: Email address of the property owner where the construction work will take place. C.6. Subdivision: The subdivision/lot/block/unit #'s can be found on the Collier County Property Appraiser website: http://www.collierapproiser.com C.7. Project Name: The name of the project, when applicable. C.8. SDP/PL#: Approved SDPs can be obtained by contacting the Collier County Records Room at GMDPublicRecordRepuest@colliercountyfl.gov. C.9. Jurisdiction: Select Option that applies. Instructions•r Section D. Contractor• • D.1. Permittee Type: Please check the applicable box. D.2. Contact Name: Name of the contractor's contact, if different than below. Owner Builder must state "SELF." D.3. License #: Contractors must provide their State (preferred) and/or County license numbers and business information. Owner Builder applicants must state "SELF." D.4. Company Name: Name of contractor's company performing the construction work. Owner Builder must state "SELF." D.5. Company Address: Address of the Contractor or Owner Builder. D.6. Qualifier Name: Provide the name of the qualifier. Owner Builder must state "SELF." D.7. Contractor Email: Email(s) of the Contractor or Owner Builder. D.7.A. For Contractors: Is Email your preferred method of contact. Please check YES box, if applicable. D.9. Company Phone: Phone Number of the Contractor or Owner Builder. D.10. Company Fax: Fax Number of the Contractor or Owner Builder. Instructions for Section E. Permit Information E.1. Declared Value: Identify the Declared Value of the construction. The Declared Value must be either the contract value OR the value established by the Items to Be Included, pg. 3 of the 50% Structural Improvement/Structural Damage Form. E.2. Permittee Type: Select a permit type from the supplied list. E.3. Description of Work: The Description of Work must convey a detailed account of the work identified on the construction plans. For a multi -story project, identify the floor/story where construction work will take place. In addition, for permit applications addressing a Code Enforcement violation, please include the case number. Do NOT state "Please see attached plans." The description of work must be included on the approved Permit. E.4. Occupancy Type: Identify the Occupancy Type from the list: Occupancy Types are established in Chapter 3 of the Florida Building Code. Amusement Parks, Stadium, Bleachers Assembly, Church Assembly, Arenas Assembly Niteclubs Assemby, Restaurants, Bars, BBanquet Halls Assembly Theaters, with Ogme Assembly Theaters, without Stage Business Chickee Non -Residential Chickee -Residential Day Care Factory - Industrial (Low Hazard) Factory - Industrial (Moderate Hazard) High Hazard (H-2) High Hazard - (H3) High Hazard (Hd) High Hazard, Explosives HPM Institutional Incapacitated Institutional Supervised Environment Mercantile Residential, Care/Assisted Residential, Residential, Residential 1&2 Family Special Purpose Storage Low Hazard Utility, Miscellaneous Udlr'ty Miscellaneous Living Facilities Hotels Multi -Family New or Guest House Industrial Commercial & MIF 12esidential E.S. Construction Type: Identify the Construction Type from the list: Construction Types are established in Chapter 6 of the Florida Building Code. Type IA I Type IIA (1 hour) I Type IIIA (1 hour)] Type IV Type VB (Unprotected) I Type IB Type 116 (Unprotected) I Type 11113 (Unprotected) I Type VA (1 hour) E.6. Is structure in flood zone: Identify whether the structure is located in a flood zone: No, Unknown, Yes. E.7. Fire Sprinkled: Identify whether the building is fire sprinkled: Yes or No. E.8. Type of Water Supply: Check the box that identifies the type of water supply. E.9. Sewage Disposal: Check the box that identifies the method of sewage disposal. E.10. Vegetation Removal: Identify whether clearing of vegetation will take place: Yes. Clearing will take place on site, or No. Clearing will not take place on site. E.11. Private Provider: Identify whether Private Provider services will be rendered: No or Plan Review & Inspection or Inspection Only. E.12. Threshold Building: Identify whether the structure is a threshold building, as defined by FBC Ch. 2 and F.S. 553.71(12): Yes or No. E.13. Repairs from Disaster Event: Identify whether these are repairs from a disaster event. Yes, Name of Event or No. E.14. Change of Occupancy: Please check Yes or No. E.15. Permit by Affidavit: Identify whether the permit is a Permit by Affidavit: Yes or No. E.16. Subcontractors: Check all the Subcontractors that will conduct work at the iob site. F. Identify number of stories in structure, floor where work is being performed, # of bedrooms/bathrooms. Supply interior/living sq.ft., additional sq.ft. being added, exterior/non-living sq. ft. and total square footage. Building Permit Application Instructions Pg. 1 (1.2020) Packet Pq. 17 Collier County Growth Management Department BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATWIN 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL 34104 (239) 252L_I.A.d PermittingDept@CollierCountyFL.gov Directions: Applicants must complete all fields. Please follow the Building Permit Application Instructions to complete this Application. B.3. Building Type: M 1&2 Family Dwell ing/Town house nRes. 3+Units/Multi-Family M Commercial rl Mobile/Manufactured Home nGuest House C.1. Parcel/Folio #: 27484000007 C.6. Subdivision Lot #: C.2. Job Street Address: 148 SEABREEZE AVE C.7. Project Name: C.3.Owner Name: BAKER, BRANDON M MARIA VASSILEV-BAKER C.8. SDP/PL#: CA. Owner Phone: 2399495588 C.9. Jurisdiction: ❑ Collier County [:]City of Everglades C.5. Email: Permits@orickmarine.com • . • • • D.1. Permittee Type: ❑x Contractor [:]Design Professional ❑ Owner Builder D.2. Contact Name: Mark Oreus D.3. License: C28961 DA. Company Name: GREG ORICK II MARINE CONSTRUCTION, INC D.S. Company Address: 2815 BAYVIEW DR, NAPLES, 34112 D.9. Company Phone: 239-949-5588 D.6. Qualifier Name: GREG ORICK II D.10. Fax #: D.7.Email: PERMITS@ORICKMARINE.COM For Contractors: The above email address is my preferred method of contact for all correspondence regarding this permit. ❑■ Yes Seclion• •*BuildinPermit ;e includes New umpsterTenant 20000 E.2.PermitType: ❑Alum Structure ❑Awnings❑Building*❑ Carport/Shed ❑Cell Tower❑ Demolition[] Detached Garage ❑Electrical❑Fence❑Fire ❑Gas ❑X Marine ❑Mechanical ❑Plumbing❑Pool ❑Roof ❑Shutters/Doors/Windows ❑Sales/Const.Trailer ❑Screen Enclosure ❑Solar❑Sign/Flagpole []Water Feature E.3. Description of Work: The Description of work must convey an account of work identified on the construction plans. Install 389 Sq Ft Dock + Lifts E.4. Occupancy Type: See Instructions E.5. Construction Type: ❑ 1A ❑ IB ❑ I1A ❑ IIB ❑ III A ❑ III B ❑ IV ❑ VA ❑ VB See Instructions E.6. Is Structure in a Flood Zone: ❑ No ❑ Unknown ❑ Yes, additional form required. See Instructions E.7. Is Structure Fire Sprinkled: ❑ No ❑ Yes E.8. Type of Water Supply: ❑ Collier County ❑Well ❑CityofNaples ❑Ave Maria ❑ City ofEverglades ❑Immokalee ❑Other E.9. Type of Sewage Disposal: ❑ Sewer ❑ Septic E.10. Vegetation Removal: ❑ Yes ❑ No A Vegetation Removal Affidavit is required for any new structure of addition on all parcels larger than 1 acre. E.11. Private Provider: ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ Plan Review & Inspections ❑ Inspections Only E.12. Threshold Building: ❑ No ❑ Yes E.13. Repairs from Disaster Event: ❑ No ❑ Yes Name of Disaster Event: E.14. Change of Occupancy: ❑ No ❑ Yes E.15. Is this a Permit by Affidavit: ❑ No ❑ Yes E.16. Subcontractors: Check All that Apply: [:]Electrical ❑ Plumbing ❑ Mechanical ❑ Roofing ❑ Septic ❑ Electric from house Only)Section F. Area of Construction Activity (Work Area Total Number of Stories: Floor (Story) work is being performed on: # Bedrooms: # Bathrooms: Living /Int. Sq. Ft.: Addt'I. Sq. Ft.: Non-Living/Ext. Sq. Ft.: Total Sq. Ft.: PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW, FOR STAFF USE ONLY PMR Date: Days Review: Sets of Plans: PAGE 2 1.2020 Page 2/4 1ll__I--& r!k- .40 3.A.d Co ��-County BUILDING PERMIT APPLIC 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL 34104 (239) 252-24nn C�tent Departnierit Perm ittingDept@co Ili ercountyfl.g Secton I. A Required Page for ALL Building Permit Applicatons ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF COLLIER COUNTY REGULATIONS BY OWNER OR AGENT OF OWNER _Q� NOTICE OF ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONS: In addition to the requirements of this permit, there may be additional restrictions applicable to this property that r be found in the public records of this County, and there may be additional permits required from other governmental enties such as the Water Managem District, State agencies, or Federal agencies. WARNING OF POSSIBLE DEED RESTRICTIONS: The land subject to this permit may be subject to deed, and other restrictions that may limit or impair landowner's rights. Collier County is not responsible for the enforcement of these restrictions, nor are Collier County employees authorized to provide lega business advice to the public relative to these restrictions. The landowner or any applicant acting on behalf of the landowner is cautioned to seek professic advice. WARNING OF WORK IN THE COUNTY RIGHT-OF-WAYS: This permit does not authorize construction or installation of any structure or utility, above or be ground, within any right of way or easement reserved for access, drainage or utility purposes. This restriction specifically prohibits fencing, sprinkler syste landscaping other than sod, signs, water, sewer, cable and drainage work therein. If such improvements are necessary; a separate permit for that purpose m be obtained from the Growth Management Department. NOTICE OF CLEARING RESTRICTIONS: The issuance of a building permit for a single-family dwelling allows up to one (1) acre of native vegetation to be clea Clearing more than one (1) acre may be allowed for accessory structures and requires a separate Vegetation Removal Permit. Properties located in the follov zoning district overlays may not be allowed to clear one (1) acre: Rural Fringe Mixed Use District (RFMU), Big Cypress Area of Concern (ACSC), and Spe Treatment Overlay (ST). There may be additional restrictions related to clearing native vegetation and impacts to wetlands or protected species found on the prop( State and Federal agency permits may be required. Contact the Growth Management Department's Environmental Services at (239) 252-2400 for additic information. Issuance of a Demolition Permit for a structure does not authorize removal of vegetation beyond the footprint of the structure. A Demo Permit is a clearing permit. WORK IN THE SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA: Be advised that Substantial Damage/Substantial Improvement requirements will apply to structures locz in the Special Flood Hazard Area with Finished Floor Elevations below the Base Flood Elevation. CERTIFICATION: Application is hereby made to obtain a permit to do the work and Installations as indicated. I, THE OWNER OR AGENT OF OWNER, ce c that no work or installation has commenced prior to the issuance of a permit and that all work will be performed to meet the standards of all laws regula m construction in this jurisdiction. The permit or application fee may have additional fees imposed for failing to obtain permits prior to commencemen c construction. The approved permit and/or permit application expires if work is not commenced within 180 days from the date of issuance. I, THE OWNER J AGENT OF OWNER understand that only licensed contractors may be employed and that the structure cannot be used or occupied until a certificate of occupa IL is issued. By signing this permit applications, I, THE OWNER OR AGENT OF OWNER, agree that I have retained the contractor identified on this applicatio provide contracting services for the trade for which he or she is listed. I understand it is the responsibility of the property owner to notify the Building Plan Review Cl) Inspection Division should the contractor responsible for providing said contracting services no longer be willing to provide his or her services. I, THE OWNER o AGENT OF OWNER, understand the review and issuing of this permit does not exempt me from complying with all County Codes and Ordinances. Furtherm N I, THE OWNER OR AGENT OF OWNER understand the owner is responsible for all construction work on the property. Job LreetAddress: 148 SEABREEZE AVE Greg Crick II Signature of COner or Agent of Owner (An original signature is required) Print Name of Owner or Agent of Owner State of Florida County of Collier The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by means of 0 physical presence or ❑ online notarization this 7 day of February 120 23 by (printed name of owner or agent of owner) Greg Crick II Such person(s) Notary Public must check applicable box: Are personally known tome © Has produced a current driv © Has produced Notary Signature: _641/T as identification. FerroYunet o�o�IRYgss0 NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF FLORIDA r r Comm# GG301498 1s"NCE 19�e Expires 2/13/2023 NOTICE OF COMMENCOENT INFORMATION Per Florida Statutes 713.135, a Notice of Commencement (NOC) is required for construction of improvements totaling more than $2,500 between an owner a a contractor related to improvements to real property consisting of single or multiple family dwellings up to and including four units. For A/C repairs or replacements, a notice of commencement is required for improvements more than or equal to $15,000. The applicant shall file with the issuing authority prior the first inspection either a certified copy of the recorded NOC or a notarized statement that the NOC has been filed for recording, along with a copy thereof order to comply with the state requirement, permits will be placed in inspection hold until proof of the NOC is filed with the building permitting and inspection department. The issuing authority shall not perform or approve subsequent inspections until the applicant files by mail, facsimile, hand delivery, email or any other means such as a certified copy with the issuing authority. WARNING TO OWNER: YOUR FAILURE TO RECORD A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MAY RESULT IN YOUR PAYING TWI FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO YOUR PROPERTY. CONSULT WITH YOUR LENDER OR AN ATTORNEY BEFORE RECORDING YO NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MUST BE RECORDED AND POSTED ON THE JOB SITE BEFC THE FIRST INSPECTION IF YOU INTEND TO OBTAIN FINANCING. Building Permit Application 7.2022 Packet Pg. 19 3.A.d A per County BUILDING PERMIT APPLIC — 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL 34104 (239) 252-2411^ G,mv0,Manaq- tDepartment Perm ittingDept@tolliercourig Secton I. A Required Page for ALL Building Permit Applicatons ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF COLLIER COUNTY REGULATIONS BY THE QUALIFIER m NOTICE OF ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONS: In addition to the requirements of this permit, there may be additional restrictions applicable to this property that n t r be found In the public records of this County, and there may be additional permits required from other governmental enties such as the Water Managem C District, State agencies, or Federal agencies. m WARNING OF POSSIBLE DEED RESTRICTIONS: The land subject to this permit may be subject to deed, and other restrictions that may limit or impair L a) landowner's rights. Collier County is not responsible for the enforcement of these restrictions, nor are Collier County employees authorized to provide legal M m business advice to the public relative to these restrictions. The landowner or any applicant acting on behalf of the landowner is cautioned to seek professio advice. C WARNING OF WORK IN THE COUNTY RIGHT-OF-WAYS: This permit does not authorize construction or installation of any structure or utility, above or bel Q ground, within any right of way or easement reserved for access, drainage or utility purposes. This restriction specifically prohibits fencing, sprinkler syste landscaping other than sod, signs, water, sewer, cable and drainage work therein. If such improvements are necessary, a separate permit for that purpose m N be obtained from the Growth Management Department. a� L NOTICE OF CLEARING RESTRICTIONS: The issuance of a building permit for a single-family dwelling allows up to one (1) acre of native vegetation to be cleat M Clearing more than one (1) acre may be allowed for accessory structures and requires a separate Vegetation Removal Permit. Properties located in the follov to zoning district overlays may not be allowed to clear one (1) acre: Rural Fringe Mixed Use District (RFMU), Big Cypress Area of Concern (ACSC), and Spe ap Treatment Overlay (ST). There may be additional restrictions related to clearing native vegetation and impacts to wetlands or protected species fourd on the prop( State and Federal agency permits may be required. Contact the Growth Management Department's Environmental Services at (239) 252-2400 for additie information. Issuance of a Demolition Permit for a structure does not authorize removal of vegetation beyond the footprint of the structure. A Demo Permit is m a clearing permit. ti Cn 0 WORK IN THE SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA: Be advised that Substantial Damage/Substantial Improvement requirements will apply to structures Iota o in the Special Flood Hazard Area with Finished Floor Elevations below the Base Flood Elevation. o 0 M CERTIFICATION: Application is hereby made to obtain a permit to do the work and installations as indicated. I, THE QUALIFIER, certify that I have not perforr o any work or installation prior to the issuance of a permit and that all work will be performed to meet the standards of all laws regulating construction in J jurisdiction. The permit or application fee may have additional fees imposed for failing to obtain permits prior to commencement of construction. The pei d application or approved permit expires if work is not commenced within 180 days from the date of issuance. I, THE QUALIFIER understand that the structure car . . be used or occupied until a certificate of occupancy is issued. By signing this permit application, I, THE QUALIFIER, agree that I have been retained by the prop M owner to provide contracting services for the trade for which I am listed. Furthermore, it is my responsibility to notify the Building Plan Review and Inspection Divi: o should I no longer be THE QUALIFIER responsible for providing said contracting services. I, THE QUALIFIER, agree that I understand the review and issuing of N permit does not exempt me from complying with all County Codes and Ordinances. `-' JobSt .et Address: 148 SEABREEZE AVE M Ln O Greg Crick II rn M Signature of Qu I 'er (An original signature is required) Print Name of Qualifier M N 0 State of Florida County of Collier C14 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me b means of 0 physical presence or y of g g g y p y p ❑online notarization this 7 day Q � February 20 23 , by (printed name of qualifier) Greg Orick II d Such person(s) Notary Public must check applicable box: ❑x Are personally known tome OtKRy Yunet Ferro ❑ Has produced a current driv se d NOTARY PUBLIC ElHas produced as identification. o j STATE OF FLORIDA y Comm# GG301498 Notary Signature: - °" E I -�% Expires 2/13/2023 NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT INFORMATION Per Florida Statutes 713.135, a Notice of Commencement (NOC) is required for construction of improvements totaling more than $2,500 between an owner a contractor related to improvements to real property consisting of single or multiple family dwellings up to and including four units. For A/C repairs or replacements, a notice of commencement is required for improvements more than or equal to $15,000. The applicant shall file with the issuing authority prior the first inspection either a certified copy of the recorded NOC or a notarized statement that the NOC has been filed for recording, along with a copy thereof. order to comply with the state requirement, permits will be placed in inspection hold until proof of the NOC is filed with the building permitting and inspection department. The issuing authority shall not perform or approve subsequent inspections until the applicant files by mail, facsimile, hand delivery, email or any other means such as a certified copy with the Issuing authority. WARNING TO OWNER: YOUR FAILURE TO RECORD A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MAY RESULT IN YOUR PAYING TWI FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO YOUR PROPERTY. CONSULT WITH YOUR LENDER OR AN ATTORNEY BEFORE RECORDING YO NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MUST BE RECORDED AND POSTED ON THE JOB SITE BEFG.,� THE FIRST INSPECTION IF YOU INTEND TO OBTAIN FINANCING. Building Permit Application 7.2022 Packet Pg. 20 I 3.A.d I Approval of Construction Documents, BuildingPlan Review & Inspection r p F(-- y 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr, Naples, FL 34104 239-252-2400 Build It! REVIEWED FOR CODE Residential Permits COMPLIANCE These electronic documents have been reviewed for Code Compliance by the Building Plan Review & Inspection Division of the Collier County Growth Management Department. The documents are available for download from the GMD Public Portal. These specific documents, listed as "Approved Plans (PR)" on the Portal, must be available for Inspectors to review on the job site in either electronic or paper form as the approved version in accordance with the Florida Building Code Section 107.3.1. Other supporting documents may be required on site as needed to meet code requirements. Permit Number: PRMAR2023030950301 Job Site Address: 148 Seabreeze AVE, Naples Permit Description: Install 389 Sq Ft Dock + Lifts 148 Seabreeze AVE, Naples Permit Issuance Date: 03/20/2023 Document List: Portal File Type Portal File NameLL 1. Approved Plans (PR) Construction Plans (148 Seabreeze Ave Dock Drawing - Prepared o (Received).pdf) Fl 2. Approved Plans (PR) Construction Plans (148 Seabreeze Ave Dock Electric Drawing for Permit - Prepared (Received).pdf) 3. Approved Plans (PR) Construction Plans (Salty Hoist Boat Lift Engineering - Prepared2 (Received).pdf) 4. Approved Plans (PR) Construction Plans (Typical Dock Construction-GOIIMC - Prepared2 (Received).pdf) 5. Approved Plans (PR) SUB2 Site Planning Document (148 SEABREEZE AVE-SP-DOCK- FINAL15MAR23-ESS.pdf) Packet Pg. 21 3.A.d East PL Proposed 7,000 # Proposed Dock Boat Lift 389 ftz 14' 7" 12' 3" 41 1 7" 11' ' 11" 151911 H.—i, 5„ 28' �1' ■ 11' 11 —16'�� Proposed 4' 20,000 # Boat Lift 20' C REG ORICK MARINE Name: Brandon Baker CONSTRUCTION, INC. Address: 148 Seabreeze Ave Naples, FL 34108 (239) 949-8888 Date: 3/7/2023 20' 771311 5' 9„ Approved Signature: Approved Date: m N d d L N 00 r M� W 00 00 O O O M N 0 N J West PL — a 15' — A4 Al Packet Pg. 22 r M 0 w 3.A.d X 6 11 \ 3 4, 5 11 11 � 12 11 3 2 3 12 2 3 3 3 3 3 GEM Remote Control w/ Disconnect Switch o- 20 amp 120v Duplex GFI Receptacle It 30 amp Shore Power Twist Lock Receptacle, w/ Inline Disconnect Switch D Lift Flood Light controlled by GEM Remote C REG ORICK MARINE CONSTRUCTION, INC. (2139) 949-5588 12 t i Goose Neck Style Overhead Light w/ Switch & GFCI Receptacle, pile mounted shining above Fish Table Over Water Adjustable LED Snook Light w/ Switch & GFCI Receptacle, pile mounted p Kichler 12v LED Half Moon Lights, mounted 18" above deck on each pile, controlled by Photocell Name: Brandon Baker Address: 148 Seabreeze Ave Naples, FL 34108 Date: 3/7/2023 1. PVC 1-Box 2. Gem Remote for Boat Lift 3. 12v LED Path Lights 4. Shore Power 30 amp Receptacle 5. 30 amp Receptacle Disconnect Switch 7 6. Fluorescent Flood Light on Lift 7. Overhead Flood Light 8. Over Water LED Fish Light 9. S.S. Transformer 10. Sub Panel (Existing) IOa.Install 30 amp 2 pole GFCI Breaker for 4 Motor Boal 1Ob.Install 20 amp 2 pole GFCI Breaker for 2 Motor Boal 10c.Install 20 amp 1 pole GFCI Breaker for Lights 10d.Install 30 amp 1 pole GFCI Breaker for Shore Power 11. Boat Lift Motors 12. Disc. $ and GFI Receptacle 13. 1/2" PVC w/ #12/3 THHN 14. 1/2" PVC w/ #12/4 THHN 15. 1/2" PVC w/ #12/7 THHN 16. 3/4" PVC w/ #10/3 THHN 17. 3/4" PVC w/ #10/4 THHN 18. 3/4" PVC w/ #10/4 & #12/3 THHN 19. 1-1/4" PVC w/ #10/7 & #12/7 THHN 20. #10/2 Low Voltage Landscape Wire NOTE: All dock electric circuits are GFCI protected in the electric sub -panel. Approved Signature: Approved Date: d N d d L N 00 r M� W It- CD 00 co O O O M N O N J a r M O O Packet Pg. 23 1 I 3.A.d I STRUCTURAL NOTES: GEIJERLL NOTES: DRAWINGS SHALL NOT BE SCALED. CONTACT THE ENGINEER OR ARCHITECT IF CLARIFICARON OF ANY DIMENSION IS REQUIRED. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE THE PROPER ERECTION PROCEDURES TO ENSURE THE SAFER' OF THE BUILDING AND RS COMPONENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION. IT IS SOLELY THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE SAFETY OF THE WORKERS DURING ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION AND FOR ADHERENCE TO ALL APPLICABLE LAWS AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING ON -SITE S4FETY PROCEDURES. DESM THE STRU RAL SYSTEMS FOR THE ATIACHED DRAWINGS WERE DESIGNED PER THE WIND LOADING PRESENTED IN SECTION 1609 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE Sth EDITION (BUILDING) AND ASCE 7-16: P.T. LUMBER REOUIREMENTS_ FMMMRS 1. ALL FASTENERS USED TO JOIN P.T. LUMBER (e.g. BUILT-UP MULTI PLY BEAM) OR FASTEN INTO P.T. LUMBER SHALL BE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING. A HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED. B. STAINLESS STEEL 304 OR 316). C. CERAMIC COATED COATING APPROVED FOR USE WITH ACQ LUMBER). 2. ALL FASTENERS MUST BE LIBELED AS APPROVED FOR USE WITH ACT? PRESSURE TREATED LUMBER. STEEL: 1. UNPROTECTED STEEL SHALL NOT BE USED WITH PRESSURE TREATED LUMBER. STEEL SHALL BE PROTECTED WITH ONE OF THE FOLLOWING. A HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED. B. STAINLESS STEEL (304 OR 316). ALIgNlRAI: 1. ALUMINUM SHALL NOT COME INTO CONTACT WITH PRESSURE TREATED LUMBER. THIS APPLIES FOR ANY GRADE OF ALUMINUM (STRUCTURAL OR NON-STRUCTURAL). ONE OF THE FOLLOWING METHODS SHALL BE USED WHEN FASTtNING ALUMINUM TO P.T. LUMBER: A A PHYSICAL BARRIER MAY BE APPLIED TO SEPARATE THE ALUMINUM FROM THE P.T. (e.g. FELT PAPER). FACTORY POWDER COATING MUST BE CERTIFIED BY THE MANUFACTURER AS AN ADEQUATE BARRIER. STRUCTURAL BEAMS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TO BE OF ALUMINUM CONSTRUCTION. ALL STRUCTURAL ALUMINUM SHALL BE 6061-T6 ALLOY OR BETTER ALL ALUMINUM STRUCTURES SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS HAVE BEEN DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ALUMINUM DESIGN MANUAL - SPECIFICATIONS AND GUIDELINES FOR ALUMINUM STRUCTURES' PUBLISHED BY THE ALUMINUM ASSOCIATION. THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS APPLY TO STRUCTURAL ALUMINUM IN CONTACT WITH CONCRETE OR STEEL. SEE 'P.T. LUMBER REQUIREMENTS' FOR SPECIFICATIONS REGARDING ALUMINUM IN CONTACT WITH PRESSURE TREATED LUMBER. ALL WELDED CONNECTIONS SHALL BE A MINIMUM 114- FULL FILLET WELD USING 5556 FILLER ALLOY. TMR- 1. ALUMINUM SHALL NOT BE LEFT IN CONTACT WITH STEEL FOR AN EXTENDED PERIOD OF TIME. ALL ALUMINUM SURFACES IN CONTACT WITH STEEL SHALL BE PROTECTED WITH ONE OF THE FOLLOWING METHODS: A ALUMINUM SURFACES SHALL BE PAINTED WITH ASPHALT PAINT OR ALKALI RESISTANT BITUMINOUS PAINT. B. A PHYSICAL BARRIER MAY BE APPLIED TO SEPARATE THE ALUMINUM FROM THE STEEL (e.g. FELT PAPER). C. STEEL SHALL BE 304 STAINLESS STEEL OR GREATER. FASFENER& 1. ALL FASTENERS SHALL BE 304 STAINLESS STEEL. ALL OTHER HARDWAR (NUTS, WASHERS, HURRICANE STRAPS, ETC.) SHALL ALSO BE 304 STAINLESS STEEL OR GREATER - NO EXCEPTIONS. 0R1G URA_ STEEL: STEEL COMPONENTS, WHEN PRESENT, SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH AISC 'MANUAL OF STEEL CONSTRUCTION' WITH THE FOLLOWING PROPERTIES: TUBE SECTIONS (ASTM A-500, GR. B) Fy = 46,000 PSI WIDE FLANGE BEAMS (GR. 50) Fy = 50,000 PSI CHANNELS. MISC. SHAPES (ASTM A-36) Fy = 36,000 PSI PIPE COLUMNS Fy = 36,000 PSI BOLTS, ASTM A325 Fy = 36,000 PSI ALL STRUCTURAL STEEL USED AS AN EXTERIOR APPLICATION (WHETHER WRAPPED WITH A FINISH MATERIAL OR LEFT EXPOSED) SHALL BE HOT - DIPPED GALVANIZED (G90). FASTENERS AND MECHANICAL CONNECTORS SHALL BE GALVANIZED. STRUCTURES SHALL HAVE FASTENERS EITHER. r) - HOT -DIPPED GALVANIZED WITH 1.5 OZ. ZINC PER 1 SQ.FT. - TRIPLE ZINC COATED PER ASTM A90. - STAINLESS STEEL WINO LOAD OUTEM ULTIMATE WIND SPEED 170 MPH NOMINAL. WIND SPEED 132 MPH RISK CATEGORY I WIND EXPOSURE CATEGORY D INTERNAL PRESSURE COEFFICIENT 30.00 (OPEN) MEAN ROOF HEIGHT N/A THESE PLANS HAVE BEEN ENGINEERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACCEPTABLE CODE AND STANDARDS AS SPECIFIED WITHIN THE STRUCTURAL NOTES. RDA CONSULTING ENGINEERS HAS NOT VISITED THE ASSOCIATED JOB SITE DESIGNS HEREIN HAVE BEEN ENGINEERED ON THE BASIS OF DATA AND SPECIFICATIONS PROVIDED BY THE LIFT MANUFACTURER. STRUCTURES CONTAINED HEREIN HAVE BEEN DESIGNED SUCH THAT THEY WILL WITHSTAND WIND LOADING ASSOCIATED WITH AN ULTIMATE WIND SPEED OF 17OMPH, BUILDING RISK CATEGORY I, AND WIND EXPOSURE CATEGORY D AS SPECIFIED IN FBC 2017 AND ASCE 7-16. THESE DESIGNS IN NO WAY REFLECT LOADS APPLIED TO STRUCTURES HEREIN WHILE BEING UTILIZED FOR BOAT STORAGE. IN THE EVENT REEVALUATE ITS WORK UPON DISCOVERY OF INFORMATION THAT IS INCONSISTENT WITH SITE CONDITIONS. NO WARRANTY ASSOCIATED WITH THIS DESIGN IS CONTAINED HEREIN. LIT IN TOP BEAM QUANTITY 8) CRADLE (0) 0 ) (E) (F) (G) 00 (1) CAPACITY (2ea.1 TOP BEAM OVERALL OF PILES CRADLE BEAM LENGTH BUNKS, CABLES DRIVE SHAFT MOTOR BEAR, GUIDE POST, BEARING ILBS) CHANNEL LENGTH (N) BEAM (IN) CARPETED (No. P&,W (GALVANIZED) CONFIG. TORQUE (LBS) HE 0KT INI CONFIG 4,500 4H x .15 150 (4) 8"-g" 6"H x 4'1N 132 2x8 (1) 5/16" 1.9" DIA. (2)-MOTOR S 3,000 60 (1EXTRU SOLID EXTRUSION 2W x .23 ,29/,ig LENGTH=144" x 16' SS 80 pIPE ea. 3/4 HP (6061-T6) 7,000 5H x .15 150 (4) 8"-9" 6"H x 4"W 144 2x8 (1) 5/16" 1.9" DIA. . (2)-MOTORS 4,000 60 (10)-3" SOLID EXTRUSION 2.25W x .26 •35 .21 / LENGTH=144" x 16' SS 80 PIPE ea. 1 HP (6061-T6) 10,000 6H x .17 150 (4) 9"-10 8"H x 5"W 150 2x8 6 (2) 5/16" 1.9" DIA. SCHED. (2)-MOTORS 4.000 80 (10)-3" SOLID EXTRUSION 2.5W x .29 35/.23 LENGTH=144" x 30' 80 PIPE ea. 1 HP (6061-T6) 13,000 6H x .21 1 150 (4) 9 -10 8"H x 5"W 150 2x8 5 16" 2)/ 1.9" DIA. SCHED. (2)-MOTORS 400p 80 (10)-3" SOLID EXTRUSION 3.25W x ,41/.25 LENGTH=144" x30SS 80 PIPE ea. 1 HP (6061-T6) 16,000 7H x .21 150 (4) 9"-10 10"H x 6"W 168 3x10 (2) 5/16" 1.9" DIA. SCHED. (2)-MOTORS 4000 120 (10)-3" SOLID EXTRUSION 3.5W x .38 .41/.25 LENGTH=144" x 30' SS 80 PIPE ea. 1 HP (6061-T6) 20,000 SH x .25 177 (6) 10" -12" 10"H x 6"W 192 3x10 (3) 5/16" 1.9" DIA. SCHED. (2)-MOTORS 4,000 120 (10)-3" SOLID EXTRUSION 3.75W x .41 41/.25 LENGTH=192" x 45' SS 80 PIPE ea. 1 HP (6061-T6) 24,000 8H x .25 192 (6) 10"-12" 10"H x 6"W 192 3x10 LENGTH=192" (3) 5/16" 1.g" DIA. SCHED. 2 -MOTORS () 4,000 120 (1EXTRU SOLID EXTRUSION 3.75W x .41 .50/.29 x 45' SS 80 PIPE ea. 1 HP (6061-T6) 16,000 x .17 48 (8) 9"-10" 10"H x 6"W 168 3x10 (2) 5/16" 1.9" (4)-MOTORS ()- 3,000 120 (1EXTRU SOLID EXTRUSION 2.5W x .29 .5 41 25 /. LENGTH=192" x 30' SS gp PIPE ea. 3/4 HP (6061-T6) 20,000 6H x .21 48 (8) 9 -10 10"H x 6"W 192 3x10 (2) 5/16" 1.9" DIA. SCHED. (4)-MOTORS 3,000 120 (12)-3" SOLID EXTRUSION 3.25W x .35 .41/.25 LENGTH=192" x 30' SS 80 PIPE ea. 3/4 HP (6061-T6) 24,000 7H x .21 48 (8) 10"-12" 10"H x 6"W 192 3x10 (2) 5/16" 1.9" DIA. SCHED. ()-MOTORS 3,000 120 (12)-3" SOLID EXTRUSION 3.5W x .38 .50/.29 LENGTH=192" x 30' SS 80 PIPE ea. 3/4 HP (6061-T6) 32,000 8H x .25 60 (8) 10"-12" 12"H x 7"W 192 30 (3) 5/16" 1.9" DIA. SCHED. MOTORS (4)-MOTORS 4,000 120 (1EXTRU SOLID EXTRUSION 3.75W x .41 .62/.31 LENGTH=192" x 45' SS PIPE ea. . 1 HP (6061-T6) LIFT CAPACITY 4,500 LB 7,000 LB 10,000 LB 13,000 LB 10,000 LB 20,000 LB 24,000 LB X/2 PILE CONFIG (4) 8-9 (4) 8-9 (4) 9"-10" (4) 9"-10" (4) 9"-10" (6) 10"-12" (6) 10"-12" X X/2 4/6-PILE UPPER BEAM (X) (IN) 147 147 147 147 147 174 189 CRADLE BEAM (Y) (IN) 132 144 150 150 168 192 192 CONFIGURATION LIFT CAPACITY 10,000 LB 20,000 LB 24,000 LB 3Z000 LB Idyl X PILE CONFIG (8) 9"-10" (8) 9"-10" (8) 10"-12" (8) 10"-12" a X X 8-PILE UPPER BEAM (X) (IN) 45 45 45 57 CRADLE BEAM (Y) (IN) 168 192 192 192 CONFIGURATION CRADLE BEAM (Z) (IN) 168 192 192 192 TO THE BEST OF MY KNOIYLEDGA AND BELIEF THESE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS CONFORM TO LOC. BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS RONNY DE AZA FLORIDA P.E. # 78411 PILES ARE TO BE No.2 GRADE PRESSURE TREATED WOOD. PENETRATION DEPTH INTO BASE SOIL SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE BASIS OF SUBSOIL CONDITIONS. MINIMUM PENETRATION DEPTH OF PILES INTO SANDY SOIL TO BE 10'-0". MINIMUM PENETRATION DEPTH MAY BE REDUCED ON THE BASIS OF A SUFFICIENT ROCK BED TO SUPPORT RUNGS AND OTHER SUBSOIL CONDITIONS UPON DISCOVERY. MARINE LUMBER AND DECKING SUPPLIES NAPLES, FL RDA Consulting Engineers CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION NUMBER: 31149 800 HARBOUR DRIVE, SUITE 210 NAPLES, FL. (239) 649-1551 DRAWN BY. C.M.W.DATE: 7/01/2020 SCALE: AS SHORN , DESIGNED BY: C.M.W. JOB NUMBER: RDA20410 ,APPROVED BY.- R.D.A. REFERENCE:RDA204- Packet Pg. 24 I 3.A.d I GREG ORICK MARINE CONSTRUCTION, INC. (239) 949-8588 Tvniral nnrk Construction s 9"+ Diameter, 2.5 CCA Marine Pressure Treated -Southern Yellow Pine (SYP) with Vinyl Pile Wrap lers - 3" x 8" .60 CCA Pressure Treated SYP - 2" x 8" .60 CCA Pressure Treated SYP (Joist spacing - 24' Max on Center) 'imhers - 3" x 8" .60 CCA Pressure Treated SYP ng - 2" x 6" .21 CA Pressure Treated #1 Dense S4S or Optional Composite Decking. ,rare - 5/8" diameter HDG Bolts minimum or Stainless Steel Upgrade Fasterners - 16d SS Ringshank Nail or #10 SS Deck Screws optional Typical Dock Construction Packet Pg. 25 3.A.d WATERWAY PREPARED FOR: BRANDON BAKER DATE OF FIELD SURVEY: FEBRUARY 22, 2023 AGNOLI, BARBER & BRUNDAGE, INC. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS, PLANNERS & SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS BY WAYNE D. AGNOLI, R.S.M., NO. 5335 DATE THIS SITE PLAN SURVEY MEETS THE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE SET FORTH BY THE FLORIDA BOARD OF LAND SURVEYORS IN CHAPTER 5J-17, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, PURSUANT TO SECTION 472.027, FLORIDA STATUTES THIS SITE PLAN SURVEY IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF THE FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS TO SURVEY MAPS OR REPORTS BY OTHER THAN THE SIGNING PARTIES WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE SIGNING PARTY OR PARTIES IS PROHIBITED BY CHAPTER 5J-17 FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. THIS SITE PLAN SURVEY IS CERTIFIED AS TO THE DATE OF FIELD SURVEY, NOT THE SIGNATURE DATE. GENERAL NOTES: DIMENSIONS ARE IN FEET AND DECIMALS THEREOF. 2. BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE FLORIDA STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM , EAST ZONE, NAD 83/90 DATUM AND REFERENCED TO THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 21, BLOCK D, CONNERS VANDERBILT BCH. EST., UNIT 1, SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS BEING SOUTH 79° 29' 23" WEST. 3. HORIZONTAL COORDINATES WERE DERIVED BY GPS OBSERVATIONS USING A TRIMBLE DUAL FREQUENCY RECEIVER (MODEL R10), RECEIVING CORRECTIONS FROM TRIMBLE VRS NOW RTN (REAL TIME NETWORK) 4. VERTICAL: ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON THE NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 (NAVD 88).ELEVATIONS WERE ESTABLISHED USING LONG TERM OBSERVATIONS WITH A TRIMBLE (MODEL R10) DUAL FREQUENCY RECEIVER GPS (GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM). SURVEYOR'S NOTE: THE PURPOSE OF THE SURVEY IS TO LOCATE THE SEAWALL AND THE WATERWARD EXISTING CONDITIONS ONLY. NO OTHER IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN LOCATED UNDER THE SCOPE OF THIS SURVEY. 148 SEABREEZE AVE. SPECIFIC PURPOSE SURVEY (lul.BRANDON BAKER 1 title: MAP OF SITE PLAN SURVEY OF LOT 21, BLOCK D CONNER'S VANDERBILT BEACH ESTATES, UNIT NO. 1 SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH & RANGE 25 EAST (PLAT BOOK 3 & PAGE 9) COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA iiii GNOLI 11BARBER & ■■■■■■IB Pg: date: MARCH 15, 2023 1288 1 scale: 1"=40' cogo #: 09-0086-1 ■■■■■■0 RUNDAGE,INC. Professional Engineers, Planners, Land Surveyors & Landscape Architects 7400 Trail Blvd., Suite 200, Naples, FL 34108 Ph.: (239)597-3111 Certificate of Authorization Nos. LB 3664 , EB 3664 & LC26000620 Fax: (239�%6-2203 acad #: I sheet #: Packet Pg. 26 3.A.d PROPOSED DOCK W/PILES -TEp W AAY o I 'o_ I I PROPOSED BOAT LIFT I� Iz Ir_ Im 148 SEABREEZE AVE. PROPOSED DOCK ( ""' BRANDON BAKER 1 title: MAP OF SITE PLAN SURVEY OF LOT 21, BLOCK D CONNER'S VANDERBILT BEACH ESTATES, UNIT NO. 1 SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH & RANGE 25 EAST (PLAT BOOK 3 & PAGE 9) COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA iiii GNOLI 11BARBER & ■■■■■■IB Pg: date: MARCH 15, 2023 1288 1 scale: 1"=20' cogo #: 09-0086-1 ■■■■■■0 RUNDAGE,INC. Professional Engineers, Planners, Land Surveyors & Landscape Architects 7400 Trail Blvd., Suite 200, Naples, FL 34108 Ph.: (239)597-3111 Certificate of Authorization Nos. LB 3664 , EB 3664 & LC26000620 Fax: (239�%6-2203 acad #: I sheet #: Packet Pg. 27 C,0 1 W County Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1036 1 Email: GMDClientServices@colliercountyfl.gov www.colliercountyfl.gov m Boat Dock Facility Extension OR Boathouse Establishment Petition Land Development Code Section 5.03.06 Chapter 3 B of the Administrative Code THIS PETITION IS FOR (check one): ❑ DOCK EXTENSION ❑X BOATHOUSE APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of Property Owner(s): BAKER, BRANDON M ASSILEV B9KER ---_ Name of Applicant if different than owner: Address: 148 Seabreeze Ave City_ Naples _State: FI ZIP: 34108 c Telephone: Cell: E-Mail Address: Name of Agent: Mark Oreus Firm: dreg Orick II Marine ConstELm1W 11nc __ Address: 3710. Prospect Ave City: Naples _ State: FI ZIP: 34104 Telephone: 2949_5.0a_ Cell: E-Mail Address: Perm its(&orickmarine.com PROPERTY LOCATION Section/TownshiP1R;1nae-- 29 / 48 / 25 Property I.D. Number: 27484000007 Subdivision: CONNERS VANDERBILT BCH EST #1 _ Unit: 1 Lot: 21 Block: D Address/ General Location of Subject Property: 148 Seabreeze Ave , Just E of Gulf Shore Dr Current Zoning and Land use of Subject Property: RSF-3 - Improved Residential 03/2023 Pa Packet Pg. 28 Coffer County 3.A.e Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1036 1 Email: GMDClientServices@colliercountyfl.gov www.colliercountyfl.gov BE AWARE THAT COLLIER COUNTY HAS LOBBYIST REGULATIONS. GUIDE YOURSELF ACCORDINGLY AND ENSURE THAT YOU ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THESE REGULATIONS. ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE Zoning N 233200 - CONNERS VANDERBILT BCH EST #1 S Land Use RSF - 3 - Residential Single Family E 233200 - CONNERS VANDERBILT BCH EST #1 RSF - 3 - Residential Single Family W 233200 - CONNERS VANDERBILT BCH EST #1 RSF - 3 - Residential Single Family M O DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT N Narrative description of project (indicate extent of work, new dock, replacement, addition to existing facility, any other 41 pertinent information): We are constructing a 24' X 50' boathouse to protect the docking facilites and to be located upon a lawfully Under Construction permitted boat dock (PRMAR20230309503) for which the roof overhang will extend 3 feet beyond the maximum permitted protrusion of 20 feet for boat dock facilities on waterways 100 feet or greater in width pursuant to Section 5.03.06.F of the Land Development Code. The proposed structure will not be higher than 15' and will have the same roof as the principal Under construction structure (PRFH2O220209432) . Boathouse will not effect any submerged land and will not require any mitigation. Boathouse will not disturb and Critical Habitats in the area. SITE INFORMATION 1. Water Width: 100 ft. Measurement from: ❑ plat ___ ft. other (specify) 2. Total Property Water Frontage: an ft. 3. Setbacks: Provided: 15 ft. Required: 15 ft. 4. Total Protrusion of Proposed Facility into Water: 23 5. Number and Lengths of Vessels to Use Facitlity: 18 ft. _37__ ft. E] survey ❑ visual estimate 6. If applicable, the distance between dock facilities per the Land Development Code section 5.03.06 H.1.d. ft. 7. List any additional dock facilities inclose proximity to the subject property and indicate the total protrusion into the waterway of each: 160 Seabreeze Ave - Dock protrusion max 20' 136 Seabreeze Ave - Dock Protrusion Max 20' 03/2023 Pa Packet Pg. 29 V[I Lley County Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1036 1 Email: GMDClientServices@colliercountyfl.gov www.colliercountyfl.gov 8. Signs are required to be posted for all petitions. On properties that are one (1) acre or larger in size, the applicant shall be responsible for erecting the required sign. What is the size of the petitioned property? 22 _ Acres 9. Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? Yes F-1 No (If yes, please provide copies.) DOCK EXTENSION PRIMARY CRITERIA The following criteria, pursuant to LDC section 5.03.06, shall be used as a guide by staff in determining its recommendation to the Office of the Hearing Examiner. The Hearing Examiner will utilize the following criteria as a guide in the decision to approve or deny a particular Dock Extension request. In order for the Hearing Examiner to approve the request, it must be determined that at least 4 of the 5 primary criteria, and at least 4 of the 6 secondary criteria, must be met. On separate sheets, please provide a narrative response to the listed criteria and/or questions. 1. Whether or not the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate in relation to the waterfront length, location, upland land use, and zoning of the subject property; consideration should be made of property on unbridged barrier islands, where vessels are the primary means of transportation to and from the property. (The number should be appropriate; typical, single-family use should be no more than two slips; typical multi -family use should be one slip per dwelling unit; in the case of unbridged barrier island docks, additional slips may be appropriate.) 2. Whether or not the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the general length, type, and draft as that described in the petitioner's application is unable to launch or moor at mean low tide (MLT). (The petitioner's application and survey should show that the water depth is too shallow to allov launch and mooring of the vessel(s) described without an extension.) 3. Whether or not the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation within an adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. (The facility should not intrude into any marked or charted navigable channel thus impeding vessel traffic in the channel.) 4. Whether or not the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25% of the width of the waterway, and whether or not a minimum of 50% of the waterway width between dock facilities on either side o the waterway is maintained for navigability. (The facility should maintain the required percentages.) 5. Whether or not the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the facility would not interfere with the use of neighboring docks. (The facility should not interfere with the use of legally permitte, neighboring docks.) 03/2023 Pa Packet Pg. 30 s' 3.A.e Co(11"er COUVIty Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1036 1 Email: GMDClientServices@colliercountyfl.gov www.colliercountyfl.gov DOCK EXTENSION SECONDARY CRITERIA 1. Whether or not there are special conditions, not involving water depth, related to the subject property or waterway, which justify the proposed dimensions and location of the proposed dock facility. (There must be at least one special condition related to the property; these may include type of shoreline reinforcement, shoreline configuration, mangrove growth, or seagrass beds.) 2. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe, access to the vessel for loading/ unloading and routine maintenance, without the use of excessive deck area not directly related to these functions. (The facility should not use excessive deck area.) 3. For single-family dock facilities, whether or not the length of the vessel, or vessels in combination, described by the petitioner exceeds 50 percent of the subject property's linear waterfront footage.(The applicable maximum percentage should be maintained.) 4. Whether or not the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view of neighboring waterfront property owners. (The facility should not have a major impact on the view of either property owner.) c rn N S. Whether or not seagrass beds are located within 200 feet of the proposed dock facility. (If seagrass beds are present, compliance with LDC subsection 5.03.06 J must be demonstrated.) c 6. Whether or not the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of LDC subsection 5.03.06 E.11. (If applicable, compliance with subsection 5.03.06.E.11 must be demonstrated.) BOATHOUSE CRITERIA The following criteria, pursuant to LDC section 5.03.06 determining its recommendation to the decision maker. criteria as a guide in the decision to approve or deny a request to be approved, all of the criteria must be narrative response to the listed criteria and/or questions. 1. Minimum side setback requirement: Fifteen feet. F, shall be used as a guide by staff in The decision maker will utilize the following particular Boathouse request. In order for the met. On separate sheets, please provide a 2. Maximum protrusion into waterway: Twenty-five percent of canal width or 20 feet, whichever is less. The roof alone mayoverhang no more than 3 feet into the waterway beyond the maximum protrusion and/or side setbacks. 3. Maximum height; Fifteen feet as measured from the top of the seawall or bank, whichever is more restrictive, to the peak or highest elevation of the roof. 4. Maximum number of boathouses and covered structures per site: One. 5. All boathouses and covered structures shall be completely open on all 4 sides. 6. Roofing material and roof color shall be the same as materials and colors used on principal structure or may be a palm frond "chickee" style. A single-family dwelling unit must ve constructed on the subject lot prior to, or simultaneously with, the construction of any boathouse or covered dock structure. 7. The boathouse or covered structure must be so located as to minimize the impact on the view of the adjacent neighbors to the gratest extent practical. 03/2023 Pa Packet Pg. 31 Collier County 3.A.e Growth Ma Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1036 1 Email: GMDClientServices@colliercountyfl.gov www.colliercountyfl.gov ASSOCIATIONS Complete the following for all registered Home Owner / Civic Association(s) that could be affected by this petition and located within 1,000 feet of the subject property. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Civic Associations and Communities page on the Board of County Commissioner's website. Applicant is responsible for and shall confirm the current mailing addresses for each association as registered by the Florida Department of State, Division of Corporations. Name of Homeowner / Civic Association: Mailing Address: _ Name of Homeowner / Civic Association: Mailing Address: City: City: Name of Homeowner / Civic Association: Mailing Address: City: Name of Homeowner / Civic Association: Mailing Address: City: Name of Homeowner / Civic Association: Mailing Address: State: ZIP: State• ZIP: State: ZIP: State: ZIP: City: 5tate: SIP: 03/2023 Pa Packet Pg.32 CoAler County Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1036 1 Email: GMDClientServices@colliercountyfl.gov www.colliercountyfl.gov m Pre -Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: ❑ Dock Extension ❑ Boathouse Chapter 3 B. of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement Checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting, and at time of application submittal. At time of submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted or processed. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Completed Application (download current form from County website) ✓ Property Ownership Disclosure Form ❑✓ Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized Q Completed Addressing Checklist Fv_1 Site plan illustration with the following: • Lot dimensions; • Required setbacks for the dock facility; • Cross section showing relation to MHW/MLW and shoreline ©/ El (bank, seawall, or rip -rap revetment); • Configuration, location, and dimensions of existing and proposed facility; • Water depth where proposed dock facility is to be located; • Distance of navigable channel; • Illustration of the contour of the property; and • Illustration of dock facility from both an aerial and side view. Signed and sealed survey _ �� `xisi� etc Ld` ❑ Chart of site waterway ❑ ❑ ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: • Following the completion of the review process by County review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. • Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. 03/2023 Pa Packet Pg. 33 Cov�Ner{?` County Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1036 1 Email: GMDClientServices@colliercountyfl.gov www.colliercountyfl.gov PLANNERS — INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: Bays hore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment: Executive Director Historical Review: ❑ Addressing: �] Parks and Recreation: ❑ City of Naples Planning Director ❑ School District (Residential Components): ❑ Conservancy of SWFL: Other: n__ / Emergency Management: Other: FEE REQUIREMENTS: RlBoat Dock Extension / Boathouse Petition fee: $1,500.00 16 J Pre -Application Meeting fee $500.00 ClEstimated Legal Advertising fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner: $1,125.00 C] If applicable, an additional fee for Property Owner Notifications will be billed to the applicant after Hearing J Examiner hearing date. (Variable) W- l Fire Planning Review fee: $100.00 All fees are collected at the time of application. Property Notification Letters, if required by The Land Development Code, will be invoiced after the petition is heard by the Board of County Commissioners. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. *Additional fee for the 5th and subsequent re -submittal will be accessed at 20% of the original fee, *The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Community Development Department I GMD Portal: https:Hcvportal.colliercountyfl.gov/cityviewweb Questions? Email: GMDclientservices@colliercountyfl.gov ia-13-a�a3 Signature qkretitioner or Agent Date -M CIrk o c eu.3 Printed Name 03/2023 Page 7 of 7 Packet Pg. 34 3.A.e Coif ier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 'ROPFRTY 01niniERCNia DISCLOc-1 iRF FnRnn This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: C Name and Address % of Ownership Brandon Baker 50 Maria Vassilev Baker 50 If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address I % of Ownership If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest: Name and Address I % of Ownership Created 9/28/2017 Page 1 of 3 Packet Pg. 35 Coif ier County 3.A.e COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners: e f [- Name and Address I % of Ownership If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the 'I I IL.CI J, a L U L.RI IUIUIn J, UCI ICI luau ICJ, UI f CII LI ICI J. Name and Address % of Ownership Date of Contract: If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust: Date subject property acquired ❑ Leased: Term of lease Name and Address years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Created 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 3 Packet Pg. 36 3.A.e COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net Date of option: CO GY County 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Date option terminates: , or Anticipated closing date: AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form. Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest -holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition's final public hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Agent/Owner-Signature Date MG�k bse�s Agent/Owner Name (please print) Created 9/28/2017 Page 3 of 3 Packet Pg. 37 F`amity Owpe~sl & Operated Ror Over 25 Years License #C28961 3.A.e Boathouse Narrative We are constructing a 24' X 50' boathouse to protect the docking facilites and to be located upon a lawfully Under Construction permitted boat dock (PRMAR20230309503) for which the roof overhang will extend 3 feet beyond the maximum permitted protrusion of 20 feet for boat dock facilities on waterways 100 feet or greater in width pursuant to Section 5.03.06.F of the Land Development Code. The proposed structure will not be higher than 15' and will have the same roof as the principal Under construction structure (PRFH20220209432) . Boathouse will not effect any submerged land and will not require any mitigation. Boathouse will not disturb and Critical Habitats in the area. 2815 Bayview Dr • Naples, FL 34112 Office: (239) 949 — 5588 • Fax: (239) 301— 2238 • E-Mail: info@orickmarine.com www.GregOrickMarineConstruction.com Packet Pg. 38 C1?F, G ORICIO.' MARINE IW1r'0I TIIIJI'W1V'TI0N Family Ownetisl & Operated For Over 25 Years License #C28961 Boathouse criteria under LDC Section 5.03.06(F): 1. Minimum side setback requirement: Fifteen feet. Response: Criterion has been met. The West side of the boathouse provides a setback of 15 feet from the Riparian line; the East side of the boathouse provides a setback of 15 feet from the East Riparian line. See Site Plan Survey. 2. Maximum protrusion into waterway: Twenty-five percent of canal width or 20 feet, whichever is less. The roof alone may overhang no more than 3 feet into the waterway beyond the maximum protrusion and/or side setbacks. Response: Criterion has been met. The actual proposed protrusion into the water way is 23 feet, with N a 3 foot being the roof overhang. See Site Plan Survey or Boathouse Cross Section a r 3. Maximum height: Fifteen feet as measured from the top of the seawall or bank, whichever is more restrictive, to the peak or highest elevation of the roof. N Response: Criterion has been met. The proposed actual height is 15 feet from the top of the seawall See Boathouse Cross Section. 4. Maximum number of boathouses or covered structures per site: One. Response: Criterion has been met. Only one boathouse will be built to cover both slips and no other Boathouse is proposed 5. All boathouses and covered structures shall be completely open on all 4 sides. Response: Criterion has been met. All 4 sides of the proposed boathouse are designed to be left open. 6. Roofing material and roof color shall be the same as materials and colors used on the principal structure or may be of a palm frond "chickee" style. A single-family dwelling unit must be constructed on the subject lot prior to, or simultaneously with, the construction of any boathouse or covered dock structure. Response: Criterion has been met. A single-family house has already been constructed on this lot, the proposed boathouse roof will be matching the same material and color as the existing house. 7. The boathouse or covered structure must be so located as to minimize the impact on the view of the adjacent neighbors to the greatest extent practical. Response: Criterion has been met. The proposed boathouse addition is consistent with existing facilities along that shoreline and does not impact the view of the adjacent neighbors. The proposed Boathouse is within the boundaries of the Riparian rights to avoid any negative impacts. 2815 Bayview Dr • Naples, FL 34112 Office: (239) 949 — 5588 • Fax: (239) 301— 2238 • E-Mail: info@orickmarine.com www.GregOrickMarineConstruction.com Packet Pg. 39 3.A.e AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PL20230008897 1 Brandon Baker (print name), as Owner (title, if applicable) of 1488eabreezeAve (company, If a plicable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner= applicant =contract purchaser=and that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. Well authorize Greg orick n Marine construction Inc. to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. *Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres. or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner" of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee". • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under pyMqes of perjury, I de I e that I ave read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the fa s stathd in it are true. ignature Date STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was acknowleged before me by means of 06hysical presence or [Donline notarization this 24 day of October 20 29 , by (printed name of owner or qualifier) Brandon Baker Such person(s) Notary Public must check applicable box: M Are personally known to me 1771 Has produced a current drivers license Has produced as identification. Notary Signature: CP\08-COA-00115\155 REV 3/4/2020 ;stein MAKERBY OREUS MY coMMiSSIoN # HH 182779 "; ra W f FSy 0q ber 6. 2025 lF,o'F N�Q: Bonded Thrurlotary Public Underwriters Packet Pg. 40 3.A.e AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PL20230008897 1, Male Vassilev Baker (print name), as Owner (title, if applicable) of 148 Seabreeze Ave (company, If applicable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner= applicant=contract purchaser=and that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. Well authorize Greg crick II Marine construction Inc to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. *Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres. or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the `general partner" of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee" • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the fa s ted in it are true. 3/13/2024 Signature Date STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was acknowleged before me by means of f7x physical presence or M online notarization this 13 _day of March 2024 , by (printed name of owner or qualifier) Male Vassilev Baker Such person(s) Notary Public must check applicable box: Are personally known to me Has produced a current drivers license 177 Has produced as identification. Notary Signature: Z� CP\08-COA-00115\155 REV 3/4/2020 MAK6RBY OREUS MY COMMISSION # HH 18277 EXPIRES: Gc., :ef 6, 202' Bondedthi, , 3e k e, MAKERBY OREUS MYCOMMISSION#HH182T79 w;; o EXPIRES: Ootoher 6, 2025 Bonded TNu Way Public Und6mfts Packet Pg. 41 3.A.e AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PL20230008897 1, Male Vassilev Baker (print name), as Owner (title, if applicable) of 148 Seabreeze Ave (company, If applicable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner= applicant=contract purchaser=and that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. Well authorize Greg crick II Marine construction Inc to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. *Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres. or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the `general partner" of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee" • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the fa s ted in it are true. 3/13/2024 Signature Date STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was acknowleged before me by means of f7x physical presence or M online notarization this 13 _day of March 2024 , by (printed name of owner or qualifier) Male Vassilev Baker Such person(s) Notary Public must check applicable box: Are personally known to me Has produced a current drivers license 177 Has produced as identification. Notary Signature: Z� CP\08-COA-00115\155 REV 3/4/2020 MAK6RBY OREUS MY COMMISSION # HH 18277 EXPIRES: Gc., :ef 6, 202' Bondedthi, , 3e k e, MAKERBY OREUS MYCOMMISSION#HH182T79 w;; o EXPIRES: Ootoher 6, 2025 Bonded TNu Way Public Und6mfts Packet Pg. 42 IJ-p 4L :lp : 114 Packet Pg. 43 3.A.e WATERWAY PREPARED FOR: BRANDON BAKER DATE OF FIELD SURVEY: FEBRUARY 22, 2023 AGNOLI, BARBER & BRUNDAGE, INC. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS, PLANNERS & SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS BY WAYNE D. AGNOLI, R.S.M., NO. 5335 DATE THIS SITE PLAN SURVEY MEETS THE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE SET FORTH BY THE FLORIDA BOARD OF LAND SURVEYORS IN CHAPTER 5J-17, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, PURSUANT TO SECTION 472.027, FLORIDA STATUTES THIS SITE PLAN SURVEY IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF THE FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS TO SURVEY MAPS OR REPORTS BY OTHER THAN THE SIGNING PARTIES WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE SIGNING PARTY OR PARTIES IS PROHIBITED BY CHAPTER 5J-17 FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. THIS SITE PLAN SURVEY IS CERTIFIED AS TO THE DATE OF FIELD SURVEY, NOT THE SIGNATURE DATE. GENERAL NOTES: DIMENSIONS ARE IN FEET AND DECIMALS THEREOF. 2. BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE FLORIDA STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM , EAST ZONE, NAD 83/90 DATUM AND REFERENCED TO THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 21, BLOCK D, CONNERS VANDERBILT BCH. EST., UNIT 1, SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS BEING SOUTH 79° 29' 23" WEST. 3. HORIZONTAL COORDINATES WERE DERIVED BY GPS OBSERVATIONS USING A TRIMBLE DUAL FREQUENCY RECEIVER (MODEL R10), RECEIVING CORRECTIONS FROM TRIMBLE VRS NOW RTN (REAL TIME NETWORK) 4. VERTICAL: ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON THE NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 (NAVD 88).ELEVATIONS WERE ESTABLISHED USING LONG TERM OBSERVATIONS WITH A TRIMBLE (MODEL R10) DUAL FREQUENCY RECEIVER GPS (GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM). SURVEYOR'S NOTE: THE PURPOSE OF THE SURVEY IS TO LOCATE THE SEAWALL AND THE WATERWARD EXISTING CONDITIONS ONLY. NO OTHER IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN LOCATED UNDER THE SCOPE OF THIS SURVEY. 148 SEABREEZE AVE. SPECIFIC PURPOSE SURVEY (lul.BRANDON BAKER 1 title: MAP OF SITE PLAN SURVEY OF LOT 21, BLOCK D CONNER'S VANDERBILT BEACH ESTATES, UNIT NO. 1 SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH & RANGE 25 EAST (PLAT BOOK 3 & PAGE 9) COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA iiii GNOLI 11BARBER & ■■■■■■IB Pg: date: FEBRUARY 23, 2023 1288 1 scale: 1"=40' cogo #: 09-0086-1 ■■■■■■0 RUNDAGE,INC. Professional Engineers, Planners, Land Surveyors & Landscape Architects 7400 Trail Blvd., Suite 200, Naples, FL 34108 Ph.: (239)597-3111 Certificate of Authorization Nos. LB 3664 , EB 3664 & LC26000620 Fax: (239�%6-2203 acad #: I sheet #: Packet Pg. 44 3.A.e SCALE: 1 "20' EXISTING SEAWALL EXISTING SEAWALL x GND 3 5M S\R 3.0 GND x 3: D PROPERTY LI PROPERTY LINE EXISTING SEAWALL 3.4 GND x 3.8 x GND g3 \ x 3.3 gM SIR h GND GND x 3.4 O 3.5 x GND 3.0' WATERWAY �1 '0 1 N 1 O I a0, 1 � �Z PROPOSED 24'X50' I z BOATHOUSE 148 SEABREEZE AVE. PROPOSED BOATHOUSE BRANDON BAKER title: MAP OF SITE PLAN SURVEY OF LOT 21, BLOCK D CONNER'S VANDERBILT BEACH ESTATES, UNIT NO. 1 SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH & RANGE 25 EAST (PLAT BOOK 3 & PAGE 9) COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Om GNOLI 11BARBER & ■■■■■■IB P9: date: FEBRUARY 8,2023 xxx XXX scale: ill =20' cogo #: 09-0086-1 ■■■■■■I RUNDAGE,INC. Professional Engineers, Planners, Land Surveyors & Landscape Architects 7400 Trail Blvd., Suite 200, Naples, FL 34108 Ph.: (239)597-3111 Certificate of Authorization Nos. LB 3664, EB 3664 & LC26000620 Fax: (239)566-2203 acad #_ I sheet #: L d Y m a N d i d N 00 0 m 00 00 O O O CO) N O N J a M O 0) Packet Pg. 45 3.A.e C REG ORICK MARINE CONSTRUCTION, INC. (2239) 949-5588 50' 80' Property Width Name: Brandon Baker Address: 148 Seabreeze Ave Naples, FL 34108 Date: 5/11/2023 Approved Signature: Approved Date: Packet Pg. 46 1 3.A.e C REG ORICK MARINE CONSTRUCTION, INC. (2239) 949-5588 Name: Brandon Baker Address: 148 Seabreeze Ave Naples, FL 34108 Date: 12/13/2023 To Be Same As House :k Approved Signature: Approved Date: c �7 Packet Pg. 47 1 I Ike I 148 Seabreeze Ave NAPLES, FL 34108 FOLIO # 27484000007 SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY REPORT SEPTEMBER 2023 PREPARED BY: TURRELL, HALL & ASSOCIATES, INC. >< Marine & Environmental Consulting PHONE:239-643-0166 WWW.THANAPLES.COM r M 0 cn Packet Pg. 48 I 3.A.e I Table of Contents 1 Introduction........................................................................................................................................1 2 Objective............................................................................................................................................. 2 3 Methodology...................................................................................................................................... 3 4 Results................................................................................................................................................. 4 5 Conclusion..........................................................................................................................................5 6 Photos.................................................................................................................................................. 6 Packet Pg. 49 I 3.A.e I 1 INTRODUCTION 148 Seabreeze Ave. Submerged Resource Survey September 2023 Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. (THA) has been contracted to provide environmental services in the form of a Submerged Resource Survey (SRS) at a property addressed as 148 Seabreeze Ave. in Naples, FL 34108 that can be identified by folio # 27484000007. This resource survey will provide planning assistance to both the property owner and regulating agencies during the review process for the proposed project. The subject property consists of a 0.22-acre parcel that can be found in Vanderbilt along Vanderbilt Lagoon that connects to the Gulf of Mexico through Wiggins Pass. The parcel is currently a single-family lot with a residence under construction. The property is neighbored to the east and west by o t h e r single- f a m i 1 y residences, to the south by Vanderbilt Lagoon, and to the north by Seabreeze Ave. The SRS was conducted on September 29, 2023, between approximately 1:30 p.m. and 2:15 p.m. Site conditions consisted of mostly sunny skies with a moderate southeast breeze. Water N clarity was fair/good which allowed approximately 12-15 inches of visibility. The ambient air y temperature was approximately 81 degrees Fahrenheit and wind speeds averaged 5-15 mph from the southeast. A low tide occurred before the site visit at approximately 7:38 a.m. and E reached approximately 0.4 feet above the Mean Low Water Mark. High tide was achieved c during the site visit at approximately 1:42 p.m., reaching approximately 3.5 feet above the Mean Low Water Mark. 1 Packet Pg. 50 I 3.A.e I 148 Seabreeze Ave. Submerged Resource Survey September 2023 2 OBJECTIVE The objective of the SRS was to identify and locate any existing submerged resources within 200 feet of the proposed docking facility expansion. Ordinarily, if seagrasses are present within the vicinity of a project area, an analysis will be required regarding species, percent coverage, and impacts projected by the proposed project. The presence of seagrasses may be ample cause for re- configuration of the design for projects over surface waters in order to minimize impacts. The general scope of work performed during a typical submerged resource survey is summarized below: • THA personnel will conduct a site visit and swim a series of transects within the project site in order to verify the location of any submerged resources. • THA personnel will identify submerged resources within the vicinity of the site and produce an estimate of the percent coverage of any resources found. • THA personnel will delineate the approximate limits of any submerged resources observed via a handheld GPS device. 2 Packet Pg. 51 1 I 3.A.e I 148 Seabreeze Ave. 3 METHODOLOGY Submerged Resource Survey September 2023 THA biologists intentionally designed the methodology of the SRS to cover not only the entire property shoreline for the proposed dock installation but also the area within 200 ft. of the proposed site. The components utilized for this survey included: • Reviewing aerial photography of the surveyed area. • Establishing survey transect lines (spaced approximately 10 feet apart) overlaid onto aerials. (See attached Exhibits) • Physically swimming the transects, GPS locating the limits of any submerged resources found, and determining the percentage coverage within the area. • Documenting and photographing all findings. 0 0 N The surveyed area was evaluated systematically by following the established transect lines y throughout the project site as shown on the attached exhibit. Neighboring properties, docking facilities, and other landmarks provided reference markers which assisted in maintaining correct E positioning over each transect. c During this SRS, one THA staff member swam the transect lines using snorkel equipment while a second remained on the shore taking notes and compiling findings on an aerial of the project site. Ordinarily, if any resources are found, they are photographed, GPS located, delineated, and analyzed for percent coverage within the area via a half meter square quadrat. 3 Packet Pg. 52 148 Seabreeze Ave. I 3.A.e I U RESULTS Submerged Resource Survey September 2023 The substrate found within the surveyed area consists of silty sand material with minimal shell debris. Depths were consistent extending throughout the entire surveyed area which was from the shoreline to the shoreline directly across the waterway from approximately four to six feet. During the submerged portion of the survey, no seagrasses, oysters, or other resources were observed in any capacity. Accordingly, no impacts to submerged resources are expected to occur as the result of the proposed project. A list of species observed during the SRS can be seen below in Table 1. Table 1: Observed species of wildlife and vegetation within the vicinity of the project site Common Name Scientific Name Striped Mullet Mugil cephalus Sheepshead I Archosargus probatocephalus Gray Snapper Lutjanus griseus 4 Packet Pg. 53 148 Seabreeze Ave. I Ike I 5 CONCLUSION Submerged Resource Survey September 2023 The submerged resource survey was conducted and completed throughout a 200-foot radius surrounding the project site and yielded few results. An existing concrete seawall is present along the shoreline with little to no barnacle or oyster growth due to it being newly constructed. There were no seagrasses or other resources that were observed anywhere within the vicinity of the project site. Accordingly, negative impacts to any submerged resources are not expected as a result of the proposed project. 5 Packet Pg. 54 I 3.A.e I M PHOTOS 148 Seabreeze Ave. Submerged Resource Survey September 2023 Photo 1: Single-family construction upland property Photo 2: View directly across from subject shoreline. Cel Packet Pg. 55 I Ike I 148 Seabreeze Ave. Photo 3: Typical muck/silt bottom sediment VA Submerged Resource Survey September 2023 Packet Pg. 56 I nk i s 1 ;1� W. - I 3.A.e I c c-_ . �v < X0 S A,, 0 20 40 s0 JCAI'Z 9NTZZ r TRANSECT — — NO SEAGRASSES 1A OBSERVED GROWII WITHIN 200 FT OF T PROPOSED PROJE( 2(o r1 'U'T'"' Hall & Associates, Inc. 14 8 S E A B R E FEE E A\/ FEEMarine & Environmental Consulting 3584ExchangeAve. Naples, FL34104-3732 SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY Email: tuna@thanaples.com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 —N. -1. )�w TYPICAL DIVE TRANSECT NOTES: THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. SURVEY COURTESY OF: "NO SURVEY DATA AVAILABLE" SURVEY DATED: MM-DD-YYYY DATL r� DESIGNED: JJR 'Ev« T M CD M N SECTION-29 T0WNSHIP-4SS packet Pg. 57 INSTR 6287714 OR 6156 PG 3533 E-RECORDED 7/26/2022 9:58 AM PAGES 2 CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT AND COMPTROLLER, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA Doc@.70 $0.70 REC $18.50 3.A.e Deed Prepared by and Return to: Law Office of Sam J. Saad III 2670 Airport Road South Naples, FL 34112 Parcel Identification Number Consideration: $100.00 Matter Number: 12386 Prepared without the benefit ***This Correcti` Official Instrumei of Collier County, This Quit Clai Co., LLC, a N Hopewell, NJ 0 whose post offs Witnesseth, th; and other good hereby acknowl assigns forever, described land, Lot 21, or plat ion of that certain Deed in ed 6/17/22 in the Public Records teal Estate Development ress is 196 Reserve Road, r-Baker, husband and wife, ,) N01100 DOLLARS ($10.00) ;rantee, the receipt whereof is ntee, and grantee's heirs and in and to the following ccording to the map of Collier County, Florida. Grantor warrants that at the time of this conveyance, the subWt prol homestead within the meaning set forth in the constitution f thesta contiguous to or a part of homestead property. _= To Have and to Hold, the same together with all and singular the appurtenanc< anywise appertaining, and all the estate, right, title, interest, lien, equity and claim either in law or equity, for the use, benefit and profit of the said grantee forever. erty is not the Grantor's e of Florida, nor is it longing or in of grantors, Packet Pg. 58 *** OR 6156 PG 3534 *** 3.A.e In Witness Whereof, the Grantor has hereunto set its hand and seal the day and year first above written. Signedd a, ed and (4blh ed in our presence. Brandon Real Estate Development Co., LLC, a New Jersey Limited Liability Company By. Brandon Balser, its Managing Member (as to STATE OF NEW JERSEY COUNTY OF Subscribed and sworn to before me by means of (il ,L day of May, 2022, by Brandon Balser, as Managing M Co., LLC, a New Jersey Limited Liability Company, who .QY'I�dQ.Y' Ljt-e (C as identification. (SEAL) Notary Printed My Cot nce or ( ) online notarization this ndon Real Estate Development known to me or ( ) has produced (!' -0 I r2 (c /fez - !f Packet Pg. 59 'Saw H 'S9703 "S 1hEF46&�� A \ f �!► Ai JU _J d r a Packet Pg. 61 a HE?MA SEA 561-775.9703 HE A.SEALNET • 0�c� a lfi 3.B 06/13/2024 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Hearing Examiner Item Number: 3.13 Doc ID: 29033 Item Summary: PETITION NO. BD-PL20230002187 — 159 Tahiti Street - Request for a boathouse and a 10-foot boat dock extension over the maximum permitted protrusion of 20 feet for waterways greater than 100 feet in width, to allow construction of a boat dock facility and boathouse protruding a total of 30 feet into a waterway that is 149 feet wide. The subject property is located at 159 Tahiti Street, also known as Lot 285, Isles of Capri No. 2, in Section 32, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: John Kelly, Planner III] Commission District 5 Meeting Date: 06/13/2024 Prepared by: Title: Planner — Zoning Name: John Kelly 05/28/2024 11:04 AM Submitted by: Title: Zoning Director — Zoning Name: Mike Bosi 05/28/2024 11:04 AM Approved By: Review: Growth Management Community Development Department Diane Lynch GMD Approver Skipped Unknown Jaime Cook GMCDD Reviewer Operations & Regulatory Management Michael Stark Review Item Hearing Examiner (GMD Approvers) David Merino Review Item Zoning Ray Bellows Review Item Zoning James Sabo Review Item Zoning Mike Bosi Division Director Hearing Examiner Andrew Dickman Meeting Pending 05/28/2024 3:50 PM Completed 06/03/2024 6:48 AM Completed 06/03/2024 12:27 PM Completed 06/03/2024 12:43 PM Completed 06/03/2024 1:40 PM Skipped 06/04/2024 4:19 PM Completed 06/06/2024 9:04 AM 06/13/2024 9:00 AM Packet Pg. 63 3.B.a -e Collier County STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FROM: ZONING DIVISION — ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: JUNE 13, 2024 SUBJECT: BD-PL20230002187, 159 TAHITI STREET — DOCK AND BOATHOUSE PROPERTY OWNER/APPLICANT: AGENT: Peter J. and Jacqueline A. Travisano 159 Tahiti St Naples, FL 34113 REQUESTED ACTION: Jeff Rogers Turrell, Hall and Associates, Inc. 3584 Exchange Ave Naples, FL 34104 The petitioner requests a boathouse pursuant to Land Development Code Section 5.03.06.F. and a 10-foot boat dock extension over the maximum permitted protrusion of 20 feet for waterways greater than 100 feet in width to allow the construction of a boat dock facility and boathouse protruding a total of 30 feet into a waterway that is 149 feet wide pursuant to LDC Section 5.03.06.E.1. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is located at 159 Tahiti Street, also known as Lot 285, Isles of Capri No. 2, in Section 32, Township 51 South, Range 26 East. Collier County, Florida. (See location map on the following page) PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The subject property comprises 0.19 acres located within a Single-Family-4 (RSF-4) Zoning District; said property has not been homesteaded. The subject BD is required as the petitioner desires to increase the existing dock and boathouse to accommodate a larger 26-foot vessel. The existing dock facility appears to be legal nonconforming; see permit numbers 1999060068, 1999112362, and 2000090941. The required 15-foot side/riparian setbacks will be satisfied. Staff notes the subject property was razed per Permit No. PRBD20180636355 and a new 3-story single- family residence have been approved per Permit No. PRFH2O230625810, issued on March 13, 2024; however, neither construction nor inspections have commenced. BD-PL20230002187 — 159 Tahiti St Page 1 of 8 May 24, 2024 Packet Pg. 64 3.B.a as PROJECT q` LOCATION a ST W belie$ S-F E Location Map Tr ad ST �441 SF A-S T „ R -4 SITE ao LOCATION 279 e, B Petition Number: PL20230002187 Zoning Map A-ST BD-PL20230002187 — 159 Tahiti Page 2 of 8 St May 24, 2024 Attachment: Staff Report 052424 [Revision 1] (29033 : PL20230002187 BD 159 Tahiti Street Travisano Dock Facility) Packet Pg. 65 3.B.a SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: North: Unimproved property within a Residential Single-Family-4 (RSF-4) Zoning District East: Johnson Bay South: Single-family dwelling in a Residential Single-Family-4 (RSF-4) Zoning District West: Tahiti Street cul-de-sac (Right -of -Way) then a single-family dwelling located within a Residential Single-Family-4 (RSF-4) Zoning District Aerial — Collier County GIS ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION: Environmental Planning Staff has reviewed this petition and has no objection to the granting of this request. The property is located adjacent to an ST overlay zone (Johnson Bay), which will require an ST permit for the proposed docking facilities prior to issuance of the building permits. The proposed docking facilities will be constructed waterward of the existing seawall and rip - rapped shoreline. The shoreline contains a mangrove fringe located along the north property boundary; any impacts to the mangroves will require a permit from the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). The submerged resources survey provided by the applicant found no submerged resources in the area. Exhibit sheet page 8 of 10 provides an aerial with a note stating that no seagrasses were observed within 200 feet. BD-PL20230002187 —159 Tahiti St Page 3 of 8 May 24, 2024 Packet Pg. 66 3.B.a This project does not require an Environmental Advisory Council Board (EAC) review because it did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Chapter 2, Article VIII, Division 23, Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. STAFF ANALYSIS: In accordance with LDC Section 5.03.06.H., the Collier County Hearing Examiner shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny a dock facility extension request based on certain criteria. In order for the Hearing Examiner to approve this request, at least four of the five primary criteria and four of the six secondary criteria must be met: Primary Criteria: 1. Whether the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate in relation to the waterfront length, location, upland land use and zoning of the subject property. Consideration should be made of property on unbridged barrier islands, where vessels are the primary means of transportation to and from the property. (The number should be appropriate; typical single-family use should be no more than two slips; typical multi -family use should be one slip per dwelling unit; in the case of unbridged barrier island docks, additional slips may be appropriate.) Criterion met. The property is located within a residential single-family zoning district; the proposed docking facility with a boathouse will have a single slip with a boat lift. 2. Whether the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the general length, type, and draft as that described in the petitioner's application is unable to launch or moor at mean low tide (MLT). (The petitioner's application and survey should establish that the water depth is too shallow to allow launching and mooring of the vessel(s) described without an extension.) Criterion not met. The applicant's agent states: The proposed boat dock project is to basically replace the existing docking facility onsite but increase the overall boathouse size and associated finger -piers to accommodate the applicant's vessel. There is riprap along the entire subject property shoreline except for within the boathouse slip, as indicated on the attached certified survey. Additionally, the survey has water depths which indicate that depths are sufficient on -site and therefore this criterion is not met." Staff concurs. 3. Whether the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation within an adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. (The facility should not intrude into any marked or charted navigable channel thus impeding vessel traffic in the channel.) Criterion met. The applicant states: "The proposed docking facility design is consistent with what is there today and has been in place prior to 1985. The dock is consistent with numerous other docks along the subject and adjacent waterways, as well as the overall protrusion. As proposed the dock and boathouse will not impact navigation as well as maintain the ingress/egress to both adjacent neighboring docks. There is no marked channel BD-PL20230002187 —159 Tahiti St May 24, 2024 Page 4 of 8 Packet Pg. 67 3.B.a within this section of Tarpon Bay, and as a result, there will not be any impacts to the existing navigation as a result of the proposed project." Staff concurs. 4. Whether the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25 percent of the width of the waterway and whether a minimum of 50 percent of the waterway width between dock facilities on either side is maintained for navigability. (The facility should maintain the required percentages.) Criterion met. The approximate waterway width at this location is 149 feet; therefore, the requested 30-foot protrusion would account for 20.13 percent of the waterway. As there is no dock facility on the opposite shore, 79.87 percent of the waterway remains open for navigation. 5. Whether the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the facility would not interfere with the use of neighboring docks. (The facility should not interfere with the use of legally permitted neighboring docks.) Criterion met. The proposed plans elicit no impact on the ingress/egress of neighboring dock facilities as the facility provides much greater than the minimum required side/riparian setbacks. Secondary Criteria: 1. Whether there are special conditions not involving water depth related to the subject property or waterway that justify the proposed dimensions and location of the proposed dock facility. (There must be at least one special condition related to the property; these may include type of shoreline reinforcement, shoreline configuration, mangrove growth, or seagrass beds.) Criterion met. The applicant's agent states: "The subject property shoreline consists of a concrete seawall with rip -rap along the entire 154 linear feet except for the boathouse slip. The proposed dock is basically a reconstruction of what is there today, other than modernizing the boathouse and associated finger piers to accommodate the applicant's vessel. Additionally, the width of the waterway and the fact the entire waterway is open for navigation allows for a dock to protrude out, which is consistent with ours within the subject waterway." Staff concurs. 2. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe access to the vessel for loading/unloading and routine maintenance, without the use of excessive deck area not directly related to these functions. (The facility should not use excessive deck area. Criterion met. The applicant's agent states, "The proposed docking facility has been fully minimized and still provides deck area for routine maintenance, safe access, and recreational activities like fishing. The total over -water square footage is 1,254 square feet, which is only an increase of 59 square feet from what is there today." Given that no changes BD-PL20230002187 —159 Tahiti St May 24, 2024 Page 5 of 8 Packet Pg. 68 3.B.a are proposed to what already exists for that portion of the dock that could be deemed excessive, staff is inclined to concur. 3. For single-family dock facilities, whether the length of the vessel or vessels in combination described by the petitioner exceeds 50 percent of the subject property's linear waterfront footage. (The applicable maximum percentage should be maintained.) Criterion met. This is a single -slip facility. The slip has been designed to accommodate a 26-foot vessel, and the shoreline is 134.4 feet; the vessel will, therefore, accommodate 19.35 percent of the property's linear water frontage. 4. Whether the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view of neighboring property owners. (The facility should not have a major impact on the view of a neighboring property owner.) Criterion met. "The applicant's agent states: "As proposed, the dock has been designed within the designated setbacks and is consistent with the existing docking facility that is there currently and has been there prior to 1985. There are no impacts to either adjacent property owner as their view will not change as the proposed overall facility is consistent with what is there today." Staff is inclined to concur as the provided side/riparian setbacks are much greater than the required 15 feet. Additionally, the facility's location is at the widest portion of the entry into a local canal. 5. Whether seagrass beds will be impacted by the proposed dock facility. (If seagrass beds are present, compliance with subsection 5.03.06.J of the LDC must be demonstrated.) Criterion met. The submerged resources survey provided indicates that no seagrass beds exist within the footprint of the dock. No seagrass beds will be impacted by the proposed dock facility. 6. Whether the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of subsection 5.03.06(E)(11) of this Code. (If applicable, compliance with section 5.03.06(E)(11) must be demonstrated. The criterion is not applicable. The provisions of the Collier County Manatee Protection Plan do not apply to docks behind individual residences. In accordance with LDC Section 5.03.06.F., the Collier County Hearing Examiner shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny a Boathouse request based on certain criteria. Boathouses, including any roofed structure built on a dock, shall be reviewed by the Hearing Examiner according to the following criteria, all of which must be met in order for the Hearing Examiner to approve the request. BD-PL20230002187 —159 Tahiti St May 24, 2024 Page 6 of 8 Packet Pg. 69 3.B.a Boathouse Criteria: 1. Minimum side setback requirement: Fifteen Feet. Criterion met: Per the submitted site plan, the boathouse will provide side/riparian setbacks greater than 15 feet. 2. Maximum protrusion into the waterway: Twenty-five percent of canal width or 20 feet, whichever is less. The roof alone may overhang no more than 3 feet into the waterway beyond the maximum protrusion and/or side setbacks. Criterion met. The subject BD is to allow for a 30-foot protrusion. The subject roof overhang is 1.5 feet, which is less than the allowable 3 feet; the maximum protrusion of the boathouse roof is 31.5 feet. 3. Maximum height: Fifteen feet as measured from the top of the seawall or bank, whichever is more restrictive, to the peak or highest elevation of the roof. Criterion met: The proposed height is 15 feet above the seawall. 4. Maximum number of boathouses or covered structures per site: One. Criterion met. Only one boathouse is to be built on this property. 5. All boathouses and covered structures shall be completely open on all four sides. Criterion met. The boathouse will be open on all four sides. 6. Roofing material and roof color shall be the same as materials and colors used on the principal structure or may be of a palm frond "chickee" style. A single-family dwelling unit must be constructed on the subject lot prior to, or simultaneously with, the construction of any boathouse or covered dock structure. Criterion met. The roofing material and color will match that of the upland principal structure. 7. The boathouse or covered structure must be so located as to minimize the impact on the view of the adjacent neighbors to the greatest extent practical. Criterion met. The boathouse is located within the required side/riparian setbacks and is consistent with other similar facilities along the subject shoreline. With respect to the BDE review, staff analysis finds that the petition satisfies four of the five Primary Criteria and five of the six Secondary Criteria, with the sixth criterion being not applicable. With respect to the Boathouse element of this project, the petition satisfies all seven of the required criteria. BD-PL20230002187 —159 Tahiti St May 24, 2024 Page 7 of 8 Packet Pg. 70 3.B.a CONCURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS: There are no concurrent land use applications under review at the present time. APPEAL OF BOAT DOCK EXTENSION: As to any boat dock extension petition upon which the Hearing Examiner takes action, an aggrieved petitioner may appeal such final action. Such appeal shall be fled per Section 2-88 of the Collier County Code of Ordinances within 30 days of the Decision by the Hearing Examiner. An aggrieved non-party may appeal a decision of the Hearing Examiner to the Circuit Court of Collier County within 30 days of the decision. In the event that the petition has been approved by the Hearing Examiner, the applicant shall be advised that he/she proceed with construction at his/her own risk during this 30-day period. Any construction work completed ahead of the approval authorization shall be at their own risk. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Hearing Examiner APPROVE Petition BD-PL20230002187 to allow for the permitting of the proposed boathouse as depicted within Attachments A and B, subject to the following condition of approval: A Certificate of Completion can not be obtained for the boathouse until after a Certificate of Occupancy has been issued for the principal structure; Permit No. PRFH2O2306258. Attachments: A. Dock and Boathouse Plans B. Specific Purpose Survey C. Building Permit No. 1999060068 D. Building Permit No. 1999112362 E. Building Permit No. 2000090941 F. Building Permit No. PRMAR20221152836 G. Applicant's Backup; Application and Supporting Documents H. Public Hearing Sign Posting BD-PL20230002187 —159 Tahiti St May 24, 2024 Page 8 of 8 Packet Pg. 71 1 3.B.b l STATE OF FLORI DA EVERGLADES CITY TAM PA FT.MYE0 APL S D, O KEY WEST COLLIER COUNTY M SUBJECT PROPERTY SITE ADDRESS: <> 159 TAHITI ST <> LATITUDE: N 25.978706 NAPLES, FL 34113 <> LONGITUDE: W-81.727889 NOTES: <> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. VICINITY MAP COUNTY AERIAL Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. T C T DESIGNED: ■ A 1--1 1 T 1 V ■ DRAWN BY a '. Maine &Environmental Consulting CREATED JOB NO.: 3584 Exchnge Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732 LOCATION MAP SHEET NO.. SHEETS 3 6,09 SHEETS O4-07, 10 Email: mnaCmlrell-assoclates.com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 SECTION- 32 iOWNSHIP- 5 S packet pg. 72 SUBJECT PROPERTY Ai �� PPR�PjE PP in � q�� EXISTING SEAWALL 3.B.b N Q -A- 1- in 0 20 40 8a t �v SCALT 9NTZZ r LO oo EXISTING BOATHOUSE V.- N O O O Cl) N O N J a EXISTING DOCK Cl) M O O N DESIGNED: JR i /\ Turlell, Hall &Associates, Inc. —1 S J TA H 1 T 1 S T CRAWNBY RMJ 2. Marine &Environmental Consulting CREATED: 03-29-23 3. JOB NO.: 23004.00 4. 3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732 1985 AERIAL SHEET NO.: 020E 10 5. Email: tuna atuttell-associates.com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 SECTION-32 TOWNSHIP- 51 S I Packet Pg. 73 1 I 3.B.b I X 4 O 0 0 0 z m m 0 A g5 SUBJECT PROPERTY V SITE ADDRESS: C / 159 TAHITI ST NAPLES, FL 34113 ` i MANGROVES EXISTING zs R MOORING PILE MLW c 6),,— E S 0 1 30 60 SCALT 9N9:EET 6 _ EXISTING BOATHOUSE N 25 AND BOAT LIFT TO BE co 3> +'6' REBUILT MLW m 8' co C1 MHW/MLW MOSTLY ABUTS 14 THE FACE OF THE SEAWALL 20, EXISTING FIXED DOCK TO BE REBUILT EXISTING RIPRAP 7 �� EXISTING q,� SEAWALL — Hall &Associates, Inc. Turrell, —1 S TA H 1 1 Marine & Environmental Consulting 3584ExchangeAve. Naples, FL34104-3732 EXISTING CONDITIONS Email: tuna atuttell-associates.com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 THESE DRAWINOSAREFOR PERM,TT,NGPURPOSES O—ANDARENOT,„,E„pEOFOR CONSTRUCTI NOTES: THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW SURVEY COURTESY OF: "COURT GREGORY SURVEYING, INC." • SURVEY DATED: 01.25.23 • APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF): 134.4' EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF): 1195 • WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX): 149' • TIDAL DATUM: •• MHW (NAND)= +0.35' MLW NAND = -1.66' DESIGNED: JR ST DRAWNN=BY: RL `ANGED ADDED SETBACKS SECTION-32 TOWNSHIP -!'IS Packet Pg. 74 I 3.B.b I ro 0 00 O 0 z PROPOSED 12'X12' 13K BOATLIFT RIPARIAN z8' LINE AA 05 k 26 6 EXISTING ` PILE TO BE REMOVED pop � a � SUBJECT PROPERTY !t� aEO b MANGROVES TO REMAIN Turrell, Hall &Associates, Inc. j Marine &Environmental Consulting 3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732 Email: tuna@tunell-associates.com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 9 N 0 10 20 40 t r PROPOSED LO BOATHOUSE (28'X15') o PROPOSED m FIXED DOCK o~o PROPOSED N HAND RAILING c M a� N O N 0 56' REFURBISHED a RIPRAP ® Cl) N PROPOSED SEAWALL PILE COUNT TYPE SIZE QUANTITY DOCK PILE 10" 27 BOAT LIFT PILE 12" 4 BOATHOUSE PILE 12" 4 N C R 29e a RIPARIAN y � LINE o 0 m NOTES: THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW SURVEY COURTESY OF: "COURT GREGORY SURVEYING, INC." •• SURVEY DATED: 01-25-23 APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF): 134.4' EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF): 1195 WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX): 149' TIDAL DATUM: •• MHW (NAND)- +0.35' •• MLW (NAND)- -1.66' PROPOSED OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF): 1254 TOTAL OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF): 1254 TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM PROPERTY LINE: 30' T T DESIGNED: JR �A H 1 I S CREATEDv03 JOB NO.: 23i PROPOSED DOCK -DIMENSIONS SHEET NO 04 CD SECTION-32 TOWNSHIP- 51 S r� C d 1= V Q C 1= t ev —NG— REV. WOW^ADDED •Ral^ANDVESSE I Packet Pg. 75 1 I 3.B.b I PROPOSED — BOATHOUSE PROPOSED 13K BOATLIFT RIPARIAN LINE 0 M E, i Ar tit C-' l , a ra 20 140 t t— SCpLE 9N FEES 0) L0 PROPOSED m FIXED DOCK ' 0000 PROPOSED PROPOSED o HAND RAILING HAND RAILING o 0 M M cm` N M ^ > REFURBISHED a. ^ %RIPRAP Cl) a) � Ea - J %y PROPOSED M SEAWALL MANGROVES SUBJECT PROPERTY it N to %V a RIPARIAN y LINE o o• � 0 c Y V 0 i NOTES: • THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. • ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW • SURVEY COURTESY OF: "COURT GREGORY SURVEYING, INC." • SURVEY DATED: 01.25.23 • • APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF): 134.4' • EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF): 1195 • WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX): 149' • TIDAL DATUM: •• MHW (NAVD)= +0.35' • MLW (NAVD)= -1.66' • • PROPOSED OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF): 1254 • TOTAL OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF): 1254 • TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM PROPERTY LINE: 30' AL Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. DESIGNED: JR TA H I T I S T DRAWN BY: Rh Marine & Environmental Consulting CREATED: 03 JOB NO.: 231 >7 �i-3584 Exchange ANaples, FL34104-3732 PROPOSED DOCK - DEPTHS SHEET NO.: 05 C E t U fC Q C d m ,E RoMJ 05f 4 23 c�JR II cTURNED oONoROOF, ADDED RAIL,, WOV Email: tuna@lumll-associates.com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 SECTION-32 TOWNSHIP- 5'I S E=Eo�w =AREFORPERMn��P RPoSEsoN rANoaRE�o, oEOFOR o s.a o� =E Packet Pg. 76 1 3.B.b l 0 0 m 0 z —11.5- CAP TIMBER (TYP) MHW = +0.35' NAVD 88 MLW = -1.66' NAVD 88 30' PROTRUSION FROM PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED ROOF (ROOF WILL _ BE SAME TYPE AND COLOR AS r THE PRINCIPLE STRUCTURE) r � -4 L Lj L H CD rn C m 1.5' I 26' T- I N O Q ROOF PILES (TYP) M � N 12' BOATLIFT O J d I � ALL PILINGS TO BE WRAPPED FROM 12" ABOVE MHW TO 6" BELOW SUBSTRATE DECKING � S AWALL PROPOSED N STRINGER (TYP) REFURBISHED RIPRAP 0 2 g r0 JC�(Cl: 9N �2:2:7 Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. w■ 4 DESIGNED: R RMJ 05-11-23 JR ADDED NOTE, OVERHANG DIM. ■ V TA H 1 T 1 S T DRAWN BY: RMJ 2. RMJ 07-18-23 TH REV. PROTRUSION DIMENSION Marine & Environmental Consulting CREATED 23004,0 3 JOB NO.: 23004.00 14, 1- 1- - 3584Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732 CROSS SECTION AA SHEET NO. 06 OF 10 15, 1 1 1 1- 39) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 SECTION- 32 TOWNSHIP- 51 S ��S��Aw��sAREFoaPERM�„��P�aaosEsoN�.a�oaaE�o.N,ENOEOFOR�oNs,R��,�o��s� Packet Pg. 77 I 3.B.b I 0 0 6�L-_Jkl' 4� 1w ell r 1 NOTE: THE DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE AND ARE TAKEN FROM THE AERIAL IMAGE. _ ,. �04 RECENTLY f,, APPROVED ti^ BDE a .Y y 14 Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. Marine & Environmental Consulting 3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732 ADJACENT DOCKS Email: tunaCatunell-associates.com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 ,„ESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERM, PROPOSED FIXED DOCK DESIGNED: JR ST DRAWN�BY: Rh t � —17' 00 N 0 0 0 M N O N ao a Cl) M 0 N a s a 0 50 faa zoo c d SCALE 9N'FEE'T t yyyea ?evn, RRMJ c 07f18-23 c„JR REV. E PROTRUSION DIMENSION SECTION-32 TOWNSHIP-! j! packet Pg. 78 9 m 0 0 0 M 0 c 0 A TYPICAL DIVE TRANSECT 1� 7 I �i I• SUBJECT PROPERTY Turrell, Hall &Associates, Inc. j Marine &Environmental Consulting 3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732 Email: tunaCatinell-associates.com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 M, 3.B.b c A Qi 6 0 N a 30 o r2a � H SCALE9N'FEET 0) m P- O - QO N O O CD M N TRANSECTS (TYP) a to C — NO SEAGRASSES WERE a OBSERVED GROWING WITHIN 200 FT OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT t O m c Y V O Q C d t - U fC r NOTES: r Q THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. SURVEY COURTESY OF: "COURT GREGORY SURVEYING, INC." SURVEY DATED: 01-25-23 F R ++ T T DESIGNED: ■ A H 1 T 1 ■ CREATED: SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY JOBNO.: SHEET .: JR �23 SECTION-32 TOWNSHIP-= Packet Pg. 79 7 A ?T' 71 p0 0 8 .00, a m PROPOSED FIXED DOCK D 3>), G y .. S cyn 0 30 60 1.20 t t— JCAGZ 9N FEE7 0) m _00 N O O O M N O N J a M Cl) O O N NOTE: THE DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE AND ARE TAKEN FROM THE AERIAL IMAGE. M111111"09 OF 1 /\\) Turl'ell, Hall &Associates, Inc. —1 S � TA H 1 T 1 S T DRAWN BY: R 1. MJ 2. Marine & Environmental Consulting CREATED: 03-29-23 3. WIDTH OF WATERWAY JOBNO.: 0 4. 7 �i-3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732 SHEET NO.: 09 OF 0 s. • • rwv `• �: � r "y JR IcREV. WIDTH OF WATERWAY tMJ I ADDED DIMENSION Email: tuna�1umll-associates.com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 SECTION-32 TOWNSHIP- 5'I S E=Eo�w =AREFORPERMn��P RPoSEso rANOARENo, oEOFOR o s.a o� =E Packet Pg. 80 I 3.B.b l o N � A IA. d ^ d 0 50 roo 200 v v m �' JC�(G� 9N �EE7 • • . s� 00w i MW w Tl._ — PROPOSED FIXED DOCK ST OVERLAY Terrell, DESIGNED: JR Hall &Associates, Inc. DRAWN BY: Rh TA H I T I S T Marine & Environmental Consulting CREATED: 03 JOB NO.: 23i 3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732 ST OVERLAY SHEET NO.: 10 d L :E O 0 m oo r N O O O M N O N J a M M O 0) N Email: tuna�tunell-associates.com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 SECTION-32 TOWNSHIP- 5 I S �E=Eo�w�N�sAaEFoaPE��n��P�RPoSEso��rANOARENo,��,��oEOFoR�o�=,a��,�o��=E Packet Pg. 81 NOTE: DIMENSIONS TO THE DOCK ARE MEASURED FROM THE SEAWALL CAP. BOUNDARY INFORMATION FURNISHED BY CLIENT. SCALE 1" = 30' RIP 1" IND IO #) CURVE TABLE CURVE 1 LENGTH 1 RADIUS 1 DELTA 1 CHORD DIR HOR CII 134.401 140.00 55-00-14" N07-10-54-E 129.30 C21 43.201 45.00 55-00-13" N07"10-55"E 41.56 ASS° FIR 5 8 8q 79. QO (NO ID #; Ov (610, Iy/` IN J � o S BENCHMARKI/�oI FPKNBD � (# 60D4) ELEV. =3.11' FIRC 5/6' (# 3964) (VACANT) LOT 286 22.6 FIRC SIB" (# 3984) I, I 12'xF FISH TABLE I TOP OF RIPRAPAT�- SEAWALL (IMPROVEMENTS NOT SHOWN) LOT 285 ZQ CONTAINS0.19ACRES plf W�ITy OF LAND MORE OR LESS. 2 �aF m Lb gIN F- I NOTE: M HW LINE / ELEV. =0.4 SIT ABUTS FACE OF SEAWALL �7)9S 9S`7� r'li�Y PANEL I 3 S so "DO•/A"(y I J LOT 284 TOP OF RIPRAP AT sEAwa L I / (NO ID #) APPROX. 149'4-TO MANGROVE OPPOSITE FRIN SHORE RIPARIAN LINE / \_r-(LINE ONLY) PILE MLW LINE ELEV. -1.T ) 25.T BOATHOUSE ROOF LINE (RIDGE LINE 1 x I 4V'3 ELEV. = 12.0') 262 DELAPIDATED 'Sg WOOD DOCK, METAL LIFT 8 BOATHOUSE MLW LINE (ELEV. -1.T ) 1.T WIDE GONG SEAWALL CAP(ELEV. TYP.) WATERWAY 2 DELAPIDATED WOOD 19.5POCK 2� 4 X=DENOTES SPOT ELEVATION (NAVD'88) 29.8' TOEOF RIPRAP RIPARIAN LINE (LINE ONLY) NOTES: 1.THE BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE CENTERLINE OF TAHI n STREET AS SHOWN IN PLAT BOOK 3 PAGE 46 OF COLLIER COUNTY, BEING NORTH 55D 19' 00" WEST. 2.IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN THOSE SHOWN ARE NOTA PART OF THIS SURVEY. 3.SAID DESCRIBED LAND IS SUBJECT TO ALL SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS, RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, ZONING AND RIGHTS -OF- WAY OF RECORD. 4.DATE OF FIELD SURVEY JANUARY 25, 2023. S.THIS SURVEY MAP IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS TO SURVEY MAPS OR REPORTS BY OTHER THAN THE SIGNING PARTY OR PARTIES IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE SIGNING PARTY OR PARTIES. B.SUSSURFACE AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS WERE NOT EXAMINED AS A PART OF THIS SURVEY. NO STATEMENT IS MADE CONCERNING THE EXISTENCE OF UNDERGROUND OR OVERHEAD CONTAINERS, UTILITIES OR FACILITIES THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OR DEVELOPMENT OF THIS PROPERTY. TELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE BASED ON NAMD. DATUM OF 1988. DESCRIPTION OF BENCHMARK IS AS FOLLOWS: FPKND#8004 IN EAST EDGE OF ROAD IN CUL-DE-SAC ELEV. = 3.11' 8.THE PURPOSE OF THIS SURVEY IS TO SHOW THE EXISTING SHORELINE STRUCTURES AND PARTIAL BATHYMETRIC WITH RESPECT TO THE PLATTED PROPERTY LINES.. 9.NO TITLE OPINION OR ABSTRACT TO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY HAS BEEN PROVIDED. ALL INFORMATION HAS BEEN SUPPLIED BY THE CLIENT. IT IS POSSIBLE THAT THERE ARE DEEDS, EASEMENTS, OR OTHER INSTRUMENTS (RECORDED OR UNRECORDED) WHICH MAY AFFECT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. NO SEARCH OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS HAS BEEN MADE BY THE SURVEYOR. REVISIONS LEGEND O = FOUND C) IRON ROD ( SURVEYOR ID #) (FIR) OQ = SET Ire IRON ROD (PSM #6004)(SIRC) . = SET 4" X 4" CONCRETE MONUMENT (PSM #6004)(SCM) E7 = FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT (SURVEYOR ID #)(FCM) H$�= BENCHMARK (FOUND OR SET) R/W= RIGHT OF WAY(R.O.W.) Q = FOUND NAIL OR PK NAIL AND DISC ( SURVEYOR ID #) (FPKN) Q=SET PK NAIL AND DISC (PSM #6004)(SPKNBD) FD.=FOUND FNBTT- FOUND NAIL AND TIN TAB BM -BENCHMARK (M)= FIELD MEASUREMENT (C)= CALCULATED MEASUREMENT P.C.P. = PERMANENT CONTROL POINT(#) C.L.- CENTERLINE P.R.M.=PERMANENT REFERENCE MONUMENT(#) (PG)=PAGE (P) OR (D) = PLAT OR RECORDED(DEED) MEASUREMENT (PB)=PLAT BOOK PL EXT- PROPERTY LINE EXTENDED CMP" CORRUGATED METAL PIPE CATV=CABLE TV F=FINISHED FLOOR U.T.S= UNITED TELEPHONE RISER =WELL GONG=CONCRETE CB= CATCH BASIN OR INLET = WATER/GATE VALVE R.C.P. =REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE S- SANITARY SEWER PROP = PROPERTY X=SPOT ELEVATION T B = TOP OF BANK TOE = TOP OF SLOPE EOW = EDGE OF WATEF BOB = BOTTOM OF RAW BOB - BOTTOM OF SLOPE EO = EDGE OF CBS -CONCRETE BLOCK B STUCCO VG=VALLEY GLITTER ELEC.- ELECTRIC TRANS 'TRANSFORMER JAC-JACUZZI DE= DRAINAGE EASEMENT SWE= SIDEWALK EASEMENT LBE= LANDSCAPE BUFFER EASEMENT IE=IRRIG. EASEMENT PUE = PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT UE - UTILITY EASEMENT LMA(E)- LAKE MAINTENANCE ACCESS EASEMENT LME = LAKE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT A.E = ACCESS EASEMENT CUE = COUNTY (U.EJ MAP OF I 3.B.c SPECIFIC PURPOSE svxvEr (EXISTING SHORELINE CONDITIONS) I LOT 285 OF ISLES OF CAPRIS NO.2 AS RECORDED IN r+ PLAT BOOK 3 PAGE(S) 46 d OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ram+ COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA (n 159 TAHITI STREET CERTIFY TO: TURRELL, HALL & ASSOCIATES a) r CERTIFICATION: m I CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY WAS MADE UNDER MY DIRECTION AND THAT IT MEETS THE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE SET FORTH BY THE BOARD OF PROFESSIO 0 LAND SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS IN CHAPTER 5J-17, r N FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, PURSUANT TO SEC' 472.027, FLORIDA 0 STATUTES. NOT A CERTIFICATION OF TITLE, ZONING, EASEMENT: O FREEDOM OF ENCUMBRANCES. p DN N N SIGNED o.3a EL COURT H. GREGORY PSM #6004 DATE 01/30/2023 M M DATE OF FIELD SURVEY 01/2512023 CD 04 a1 to 0 Q 3 V IF ci PSM # 6004 4) LB # 7112 y Co� m Court Gregory Surveying, 11 aa)) 761 Teton Court E Naples, Florida 34104 (239)643-7845 office Date 01/30/2023 ogs6004@comcast.net Job # EN40251M Q (239)272-3707 cell Fb MI-48 Pg 4 d E v R Q 3.B.d CD+ Permit Details Permit # Status Type Address Address # 1999060068 SUSPEND DOCK 159 TAHITI ST 136758 Master # Model ID Model Description WWP 1999060068 N COA # Contractor PG Owner Name Estimated Value SEBRING, LESLIE W N/A $7500.00 P Owner Address Fcc Code Fcc Code Description 5660 EMERSON WAY 329 STRUCT OTH THAN BLDG- POOL/SEAWALL/DOCK/FENC Owner Owner Owner E/SCRN Address City Address State Address Zip Applicant Applicant Name INDIANAPOLI INC032 462205377 Type S CN MARCO DOCK & LIFT, INC. Contact Name Contact Phone DUANE THOMAS (941)642-9500 Job Description Job Phone INSTALL 23 (941)642-9500 REINFORCEMENT PILES Certificate # DBA License # 19251 MARCO DOCK & LIFT, INC. Subdivision # Subdivision Description SDP # 961 Isles of Capri No. 2 FLN Property Block Lot TAZ Status 0000052395960007 A 285 168 Section Township Range 32 51 26 Surveyor Survey Date Benchmark Benchmark Location Elevation Flood Elevation Flood Map Flood Zoning 5/28/2024 3:06:55 AM Packet Pg. 83 3.B.d 0801 AE-10 Set Back Set Back Rear Set Back Left Set Back Lot Area Lot Acres Front Side Right Side Max Building Max FAR Planning Community Lot Width Lot Depth Height MI Set Back Special Zoning Atlas Page 1632N Zoning Zoning Description Zoning Overlay RSF-4 SINGLE FAMILY: 4 DU/GROSS ACRE. Dates Applied On Approved Approved By Issued Issued By 6/1/1999 6/1/1999 FONTAINE_S 6/1/1999 GARRETT_S CO COed By Finaled Finaled By Expiration 11 /28/1999 Extended Expired Expired By Canceled Canceled By Expiration Building Project # Calculated Construction Code Construction Code Job Value Description $8000.00 10 OTHER Living Sqft Non -Living Total Sqft Building Building Building Sqft Height Width Length Bedrooms Baths Stories Habital Floors Elevators Escalators Residential Commercial Porch Additional Information Units Units 0 0 N install 23 reinforcement piles on existing dock. SEE RE-APP 1999112362 NOC Plans Coastal COCC BCAI CCCL Required Construction Zone 5/28/2024 3:06:55 AM Packet Pg. 84 3.B.d Y Y N Y N Radon Plan Alterations N Enclosed Outside Total Parking Handicap Carport Parking Parking Spaces Parking Spaces Spaces Spaces N Permit Items Item Description Qty Amount MFSG MICROFILM SURCHARGE 2 $2.00 STRUCT STRUCTURAL FEE 8000 $59.00 Inspections Insp Code Description Request Date Schedule Insp Result Code Result 099 NOTICE OF COMMENCEM ENT 115 FINAL BUILDING Comments Comment SEE RE-APP 1999112362 Fee Details Transaction # Code 133343 08BPNP 133343 08MFSG COes MICR S" Result Last Updated Last Updated By 12/1/1999 FONTAINE_S Description Amount Due Date Paid Amount Paid Status BLDG $59.00 6/1/1999 $59.00 POSTE PERMITS - NAPLES MICROFILM $2.00 6/1/1999 $2.00 POSTE SURCHARGE CONbr Type Status Plan Reviews Review Review Status Release Department Remarks Issd Date Due Date Release Date In Date 5/28/2024 3:06:55 AM Out Dal Packet Pg. 85 3.B.d Remarks OFILM SURCHARGE TRUCTURAL FEE Date Inspector Remarks D View Details D View Details to 5/28/2024 3:06:55 AM Packet Pg. 86 3.B.d SubContractors Type Status Certificate DBA Status 5/28/2024 3:06:55 AM Certificate # Packet Pg. 87 3.B.d " 6 COLLIER C.OU .14ARD OF CGUKTY-C SSIONERS PERMIT PERMIT #: 1999060068 PERMIT DOCK VALID 068 ISSUED: 06-01-99 BY: GARRETT_3 APPLIED 06-01-99 APPROVAL DATE: 06-01-99 MASTER #: 1999060068 COA N/A JOB ADDRESS: 159 TAHITI ST JOB DESCRIPTION: INSTALL 23 REINFORCEMENT PILES JOB PHONE: (941)642-9500 LL SUBDIVISION #: 961 - Isles of Capri No. 2 BLOCK: LOT:285 a FLOOD MAP: 0801 ZONE: AE-10 ELEVATION: c FOLIO #: 0000052395960007 TOWNSHIP -RANGE -SECTION: N OWNER INFORMATION: SEBRING, LESLIE W 5660 EMERSON WAY INDIANAPOLIS, INCO32 462205377 CONTRACTOR INFORMATION: MARCO DOCK & LIFT, INC. 709 BALD EAGLE DRIVE MARCO ISLAND, FL 34145- CERTIFICATE #: 19251 PHONE: (941)642-9500 FCC CODE: 329 - STRUCT OTH THAN BLDG-POOL/SEAWALL/DOCK/F CONSTRUCTION CODE: 10 / OTHER JOB VALUE: 8,000.00 TOTAL SQFT: SETBACKS FRONT: REAR: SEWER: SEPTIC CONTACT NAME: DUANE THOMAS CONTACT PHONE: (941)642-9500 WATER: T,RFT RIGHT: WELL Per Collier County Ordinance No. 96-83. as amended, all work under the approved building permit shall comply with all applicable laws, codes, ordinances and additional stipulations and/or Conditions of Permit The approved permit expires if work authorized is not commenced within six (6) months from date of issue evidenced by the successful completion of the foundation inspections as stated in Ordinance No. 96-83 104.6.1.b as amended. Fee Resolution No. 96-594 provides for additional fees for failing to obtain permit. prior to commencing construction. The permittee further understands that only licensed contractors may be employed and that the structure shall not be used or occupied until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued. NOTICE: In addition to the requirements of this permit, there may be additional restrictions applicable to this property tha may be found in the public records of this county, and there may be additional permits required from other governmental entities such as water management districts, state agencies, or federal agencies. WARNING TO OWNER: YOUR FAILURE TO RECORD A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MAY RESULT IN YOUR PAYING TWICE FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO YOUR PROPERTY. IF YOU INTEND TO OBTAIN FINANCING CONSULT WITH YOUR LENDER OR AN ATTORNEY BEFORE RECORDING YOUR NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT Packet Pg. 88 3.B.d Official Receipt - Collier County Board of County Commissioners CDPR1103 - Official Receipt Trans Number Date I Post Date Payment Slip Nbr 133343 611199 1:44:27 PM 611199 IPT 1999060068 Address: 159 TAHITI ST Owner: SEBRING, LESLIE W COA #: N/A Permit Type: DOCK Job Desc: INSTALL 23 REINFORCEMENT PILES Applicant: MARCO DOCK & LIFT, INC. DBA: MARCO DOCK & LIFT, INC. Swr Meter: Wtr Meter: Payor : MARCO DOCK Fee Information Fee Code Description GL Account Amount Waived 08BPNP BLDG PERMITS - NAPLES 11313890032211000000 $59.00 08MFSG MICROFILM SURCHARGE 11313890034144200000 $2.00 Total 1 $61.00 Payments Payment Code I Account/Check Number Amount CHECK 721 $61.00 Memo: Collier County Board of County Commissioners CD -Plus for Windows 951NT Total Cash Total Non -Cash Total Paid $o.ao $61.00 $61.00 Cashierllocation: GARRETT_S 1 1 User: FONTAINE S Printed:611199 1:45.25 PM Packet Pg. 89 3Bd COLLIER • , 7Y EXPRES5'�Rt1iiT NO#M - IVZ� C0�'ER.N'hilrtiT APPLICATION FOR BUILD1h4G PERMIT 1 A CERTIFIED BLUE CHIP CONVAN . - COLLIER COUNTY, FLOPJDA 9C1403.2 0 Propertyi.D.:52395(a000� Application Dated_/,L/„ffApprov�ed Dste: II I CSA MR Temp t;ors-.. Trailer � VC Replacement lN'PT Residential Interior Well MRG Lawn Sprinklers ��-_GDWD Sliding Glass Doom/WindowsREAL A16'NG Awning CerporW+'t,�Alunv..dS t PLNG Pilings - Raidenhal NESN Sign -Non Electrical ELSN Sign-Eleetrital —CRPT CHKE Chickee - S/F •„+_PLAL plumbing RepairslAltrntiaru LPGT Propane Galt Tank System SLAB Concrete Slab `„POOL S!F Swimming Pool5pa T Combust Liquid Storage Tank OCK Dock & Davits REFR Refrigeration =ALRF � TPOL Elecdcal Service DEMO Demoiitioa Aluminum Roof Over -,�SHRF Shingle/Composite Roofing �T Tent fmdon ECK Wood Deck _KN-EL Minor Electrical Work EXHD Exhaust Hood System TLRF Tile Roofin= SEWL SeawalVNew/Repairs.Eng Rtq FXWL Exterior Will Alteration SCCG Screen Enclosurw3creen Raul SCPR Screen Roorn/Pan Roof + `SPTX Septic T".butallatio:mcpair SHTR Shutters ___�F',N'CE F"te"Privacy wall SCWR Screen RoonvVood Roof _ TNCT Tennis Court FALRSPK Fire Alum System SDNG Siding/Vinyt/AlurtsinuWVood , SWRT Sewer Tip FSPK Fire Supp:cler System FSUP Fite Strppretsion System SHED S/F Storage She —SLRH Solar Healing System LPG? Propane GIs Piping Only BROT Residential Other RESIDEATIAL - USE I OCC CODE - �_99E • ERpresS Residential Other Specify: --W�321 - Other Residential Buildings - Shed / Carport I & 2 Family Sq/Ft 329 - Structures other than buildings - Pool/Seawall/ Fence Sq/Ft 1', Specify: Address: CMG L G l City: State: zip'. Job Representative:_ T Pbane Number: {q�ll, {�p2., _ JC.70 Contracted Yalut of Improvement / Construction Praper of Record: Address: V —V-P% ,7 Phone ,Number: NON-RESMENTL{IL - USE / OCC CODE ,^,,,^_,999 - Express Non•Residendal Other Specify: S29.Other Non-Raidcntial Buildings Cooler / Freezer / Shed Specify: 529 • Snrtnres other than Buildings Fence / Ash / Seawall /'yank ! Tower ! tsZ Roof Structure 5peeify: Township: • i� l Rnge:--a k - - - oVParctl:,",� , Urslt: { Tract:,,,,` nenl Loeatlen: 1 2 3 4 S 6 7 8 9 30 11 12 13 nlag: R-5 F—L� :backs - Front... Rear LSide _.rL 99.Notice of Cont tens _201 Tubset 701 Final Pool — REVIEH'ED FOR CODE - _100 Footings ,^,,,,203 Sewer To 702 Pool Deck COMPLIANCE COUN-n' DEFTS. �101 Pile caps _204 Final Plumbing 800 Rightor-Way t.,1 4 D ;r -„103 Slab 205 1!riguion `301 Site Dminafe Zoning / Building [ , $� `104 Tit Be&-% _300 Mechanical Rough A/C 303 Parking -,_107 Shea.Nnj Metal Fas `301 Final Mechanical �900 Marco Fire Dept. Electric S `108 Framing 400 Rough Gas �901 East Naples Fire Dept. —I 1 Tie Down _401 Final Gas „�902 North Naples Fire Dept. Engineering $_ I Rooting in Progress __501 Electric Rough ,-,,, o Golden Gate Fire Dept. YI I S Final Building 502 Final Electrical 904 Little Hickory - Bonita Fire S „122 Spot Survey - 10 Da _503 Service Change �903 Ochopet Fire Dept. ,Wcrofllm 129 SeawslVEngr. Ceti. _506 Underground Elect. __906 Immokslet Fire Dept _-,,,134 Final Roofing 619 Pollution Control 907 Big Corkscrew Fire Dept SCAI S -200 Plumbing Rough �700 Pool Steel & Ground TOTAL PERAflT FEE S � µ'AA�L,}G- WORK IN COUNTY R1GKT-IF-WAY This permit does not autharlse construction or installation of any structure or mtility. above or below ground, wilhin any right-of-wey or easement reserved for ottest, drainage or utility purposes. This rsstriciloa eptcllkolly pr obibits fencing. sprinkler systems, landscaping other than sod, sling, water, sewer. table and drainage work thertla. if ruck Improvements are aeteasary, it separate permit for that porpese most bt obtained from Prof en Review Services. (941.443-4471) OVITER-BUILDER DLSCLOSURE STATEMENT Misregard if Applicant is eel to Owner•liullder) Stele Law and Collier County Ordinance requires eoestructloa to be dope by licensed toeeraciors- Ifyou are applying for it permit under an utmp- ttoa 10 that law, the eaeinption allows you, as the owner of ebe property, to Oct at year own Contractor even tbougb you do not ►awe a litensa. You must supervise the construction yourself. You may build or improve a ont-family or tyre -family raideace or a farm bvilding. The building mart be for your own use and Occupancy. It may not be bu1111for salt or !rage. lryou sell or lease a building you nave built yourself wilhln *Be (1) Year slier the construction Is complete, Theta* will presume that you built it for sale Or lase, wblcb t: a violation. of this esctpelem. Moreerrr, an builder mpplytag for, or receiving more than one (1) building permit for the temstmedem ore one-Gmily or two -(amity dwelliag in any three year period shall be prima lade evidence of bull dinecontiricting wHbout a ucenst which is a violation of the C011it County Coda. It Is your responsibility io make su►e that people employed by you hove licenses requirtd by state law sod by county or munl-lpal licensing ordlnaneoR Any person Marking in your building who is not licensed must work under your supervision and mutt be tstsployed by you, which means that you mull deduct F.I.C.A. and withholding tax and provide workers' compensation for that emplayte, sit as prescribed by law. Your construction must comply with all applicable aws, ordinances, building todet, and aaphug regulalioas. MTICE: n addiden tg the reguiremean oft is Permlit. 1 ere jmmv be additional r1grIctloel apoiltsbIt to thip siElegrty that may be found In thy lulitlS rmirdlikUthig.. ounty, and there mty be additional permits rtguIrediamother avernmental entllles su h at water manalitinent districts sate effiftelth or federal a en kpplicoot's Name {must be Hato Revetrotloe No. OfC ,oclal Setvrity No. (if Own 1pplleaalIs Slgpatgre_(musf be nets Stale of Florido, Cossq of Collier, ..,� - 'a` balldln�Ptrmlfl applltatlon was subscribed before we title f _ra A4o 1! 9�.......� y 4r who Is eswnatty knows to r prodmted s Idendfreatioo, and who Stated upon oath or otttrmadom (circle one Is Ii lading permit application, that the iofor metlop and lattments to this building permit application ere true to Use best of hlarher know[ a I the war dome Is oil by the owner. Qory Pubiie •�..,c Blake Wishart *�*my Commission CC826917 Expires April 14 2003 for r LL Y V 0 0 0 c H r as iE M H 0 0 m r` eo N 0 0 0 CO) N 0 N J a M Cl) 0 N Packet Pg. 90 i • . • a 01 .:A CA I CI) ij cn I 16ti Packet Pg. 91 1 m LL .Nd 0 0 0 ca O — m LO ov oo O O CD Cn O Cn O I I Packet Pg. 92 1 3.B.e CDPR2025 OLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION This Certificate is issued persuant to the requirments of the Standard Building Code certifying that at the time of issuance this structure was in compliance with the various ordinances of the county regulating building construction or use. For the following: PERMIT NBR: 1999112362 CO TYPE: COMP CO NBR: 155626 STATUS: ISSUED ISSUED DATE: March 16, 2000 ADDRESS: 159 TAHITI ST SUBDIVISION: 961 Isles of Capri No. 2 LOT: 285 BLOCK: T.R.S.: SLUC CODE: 1 UTILITY COMPANY: JOB DESC: RE-APP SEE #1999060068 NUMBER OF METERS: OWNER: SEBRING, LESLIE W 5660 EMERSON WAY INDIANAPOLIS INCO32 462205377 LEGAL DESCRIPTION ISLES OF CAPRI NO 2 LOT 285 Note: A new certificate is required if the use of the building or premises is changed, or if alterations are made to the building or property described. A new certificate voids any certificate of prior date. Collier County Board of County Commissioners Printed on: 03/16/200 2:07:24PM CD -Plus for Windows 95/NT Page 1 o Packet Pg. 93 3.B.e Official Receipt - Collier County Board of County Commissioners CDPR1103 - Official Receipt Trans Number Date I Post Date Payment Slip Nbr 168040 1113011999 4:10:00 PM 12/01/1999 PT 1999112362 Address: 159 TAHITI ST Owner: SEBRING, LESLIE W COA #: NIA Permit Type: DOCK Job Desc: RE-APP SEE #1999060068 Applicant: MARCO DOCK & LIFT, INC. DBA: MARCO DOCK & LIFT, INC. Swr Meter: Wtr Meter: Payor : MARCO ROCK Fee Information } Fee Code Description GL Account Amount Waived 08BPNP BLDG PERMITS - NAPLES 11313890032211000000 $59.00 08MFSG MICROFILM SURCHARGE 11313890034144200000 $3.00 Total 1 $62.00 Payments Payment Code AccountlCheck Number Amount CHECK 1554 $62.00 Memo: Collier County Board of County Commissioners CD -Plus for Windows 951NT Total Cash $0.00 Total Non -Cash $62.00 Total Paid $62.00 Cashierllocation: FROLOFF E 1 1 User: WARREN W Printed.11/30/1999 4:11:02 PM Ca U_ U O 0 0 A a L co''W^ r LO 0 m 00 N O O 0 M N O N J a M M O O N Packet Pg. 94 3.B.e COLLIER COuxry 0 i -EX RESS PER'►IId. COVEFLN'MEtiT nos'FOR BUILDING PERWT A CERTIFIED BLUE CHIP C60AhY COLLIER C0L TY, FLOR3DA 9S1.43.2400 Property Z.D.: „tea S9 5 5 l 2t.) 7 Application Date: ii / 0112Appro►�ed Date: 1 1 CSA w,,,_C7LR Temp Cons-.. Trailer RWN NC Replacement A -PT Rtsidentiatl interior Watl1 MRG Lawn Sprinklers ,,,,,,,,G>3WD Sliding G1eu Don indows AuTG Awning Gryorllu't,.,+:/Alurrv„dS t. "_,PLNG Pilings - Residential - r NESN Sign -Non Electrical „_,,,,, ELSN Sign► -Electrical _CRPT CHIDE Chickee • S/F PLAL plumbing Repairs/Altersdons LPGT Propane Gas Tank System —SLAB Concrete Slab �,,, SLAB S/F Swimming PaollSpa SIFEleS iningServi:e CLST Combust Liquid Stange Tank Dock fi Davits -,w,-REFR ReM=eration „�TPOL al —DOCK noli )ec ,,,,,,,_KN'EL _ALRF Aluminum Roof Over SHXF Shingle/Composite Roofing TENT Tent Erection Wood Deck Minor r__-_EXHD Minor Eleood s Work I Erxte tio! hood System TLRF Tile Roofing .DECK _,_„�,SEWL Seawill/New/Repairs•Eng Rtq 'L EXu1 Exterior Alteration `_SCCG Screen Enclosurtt/5creen Roof �,_ SCPR Screen RoonTin Roof _ iSPTK Septic Tank Iltstallap`o:t/Rtpair Shutters v3cyWal _-_FALR fireFenA Privuy Wall FALR fire Alarm System SCWR Screen Room/Wood Roof _SDNG Sid ingNinyl/Alurlsinurn/Wood w,,,_,SHTR TNCT Tettt:ls Court SWRTSewer Tap _ FSPK Fire Sprinkler System FSUP Fire Sapprrision System SHED S/FStoragt She ,_,__SLRH Solar Heating System LPG? Propane Gas Piping Oa1y RIOT Residential Other ecc.htyt:il_TuL - USE / OCC COD£ Express Residential Speeiiy: .., 321- Other Residential Buildin Shed / Carport I Sq/Ft-{� 329 • Struenres other than buildings Pool / Seawall / Dock / Fnce $q/FI wpm Spcci fy: Applicant: � � � Address: A t d "--,le Cure ---Stale: f Zip: Job Represtmadveu Phone Number: (W-i )..Ln�Z - 95o o Contracted Value of lmpru+'etnent / Construction: Prop4m. Address: Cut.-:-,L Phone Nt 99 N'064e of Commenc 20I Tubset —100 Footings .203 Sewer Tap 101 Pilc Gps ,204 Final Plumbing -„:205 „--„103 Slab - _Irrigation —104 Tie Beam _300 Nitchanicsl Rough NC -,-,_147 Shea:l irg Sletal Fis _301 Final Mechanical —IDS Framing �400 Rough Gas ,,,_,-I 10 Tic Down 401 final Gas _, 111 Roofing in Pro Cress „1SOI Electric Rough —I 13 Final Building Final Electricai 122 Spot Survey - 10 Do _502 _503 Service Change r,-,_129 SawaIVEngr. Ctrs. _506 Underground fltel, —134 Final Roofing _619 Pollution Control —200 Plumbing Rough _700 Pool Steel & Ground NON-R,E51DENMAL - USE / OCC CODE 999 - Express Non -Residential Other Spec*. 528 - Mee Nart•Residentiai Buildings Cooler / Freezer / Shod Specify: $29 • Structures other than Buildings Fence / Dish / Seawall / Tank / Tower / Roof Structure Specify: Section:-_„_,_,__,_Towashlp:—PAnge:,r,___ Block-_Lat/Parcel: a85 UNtt-_ '—rTraet:— Central Lotation: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 f 10 11 12 13 %backs - Fran _701 Final Pool 702 Pool Deck ,,,_,500 Right-of•Way _$01 Site Drainage • 103 Parking _900 Marco Fitt Dept. _901 Fast Naples Fire Dept. _902 North Naples Fitt Dept. ,903 Golden Gate Fire DtpL -_9W Little Hickory - Bonito _905 Ochopet Fits Dept. __906 Immokaiee Fire Dept. 907 Big Corkscrew Fire Dept T.A.2: xtor i-.5idt Rblde RENIE'WED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE COUNTY DEPTS. Initial Date Zoning 1 Building � ICA Electric S Engineering J S Fire 'S��- Mjri;i icrofilto � AL P1ERI►11T FEE This permit data not authorize tenstrusAan Orin J"' UWUS j Y RU41`1 I -tit -WAY sulliffon of any structure or rtlllry, above air below ground. within any right-of-wey or asement reeervrd for oeens, drainsgt or utility purposes, This restrictloa speelfieally prebiblb rearing. sprlakltr systems, tandseapfag other then sod, sagas, water, sewer, table and dralnegr work therein. If such lmprovemeoto are aeeeaaary, a separate permit for that psrpost roust be obtained from Project Revitw Str•Ices. (9414434471) OA NIER-BUILDER DUCLOSURE STATEMENT (Disregard if Applleast is sat so 0wrer•1yuIlder) State Law and Csllitr County Ordinaset requires eerstrrtllos to be dose by liceaaed aoatrattom If yell art applying far a permit voller on ssemp• lion to tilt law, the taempticas allows you, as the Owner of the property, to act as your awe castractor even though you do not have a lirrmsa. You Mull supervise the construction yourself. You may build or Improve s srtfamily or two-family residence or a farm building. The building moat be for your awn ose and octupanty. It may net be built for oite or least. If you sell or lease a butidlog you have bull% yourself witbla set (1) year after the construction Is eomplele, the law wlti prgtimc that you built It for sale or Lassa, wlalcb b a vfola%len of All escepttes. Moreover, so swoer- builder applying for, or rmoriviog more than one (1) building permit for the eoretrstdo■ Oro one -firmly or two-family dweliiag In any three year Period shall be prima facie evidence orbuilding/contreeting without a notes* whit! Is a vtslatlaa of the Collie County fade. It Isyaor respessibliity 10 make sure that people employed by you have licenses required by nett Ire and by county or muni;lpal licensing Ordinances. Any person working an your building he Is not licensed must work tinder your supervision and must be esnplayed by you, which means that you must deduct F.1.C.A. and k1thhotding tat and provide workers' compensation for the, emplayM all as prescribed by law. Your construction must comply with all applicable aws, ardlnsncee, ballding codes, and zoning regulations. SOTICE.- n Addithin t the r ulr•mrata aft !There maw be addlI141121MIZ1511061 10111leshle to this pEgotrty that rnav be found In th labile FeeeeA. r.Le. 1ppticart'a llama (must be Nocarlsed) Yt� �� M-f�S� Mate Itegietradea No. (If Ceatrselor) DOtlal Set gdty Nna At C4.mvr_A..tt.1..% Oplicart's Signature (must bit 54le of Fhrld4 Currey of colller, his building mis application wan aab+trribed before stir Ulu f' des; of �✓ 1f� y S earrsna known es r Prod god s IdentiricrtION cad who stated upon oath er eAlrmatlas (elrc ere t at tAbe has read this bvllding permit applleatlea, that tbo iaformatsap sod tateeaeats to this building permit sppilealiom ire tree to the best of ils1ker knowtedjt, "fiat the work to dome is motherland by he swtsar. No" ltailae .•'01 N Lynda E Wishart-White **MY Commission CC873141 Expires September 22, 2003 Packet Pg. 95 3.B.e COLLIER COUNTY BOA OF COUNTY COMMISSIRIERS PERMIT PERMIT #: 1999112362 PERMIT TYPE: DOCK VALID 362 ISSUED: 11-30-99 BY: FROLOFF E APPLIED DATE: 11-30-99 APPROVAL DATE: 11-30-99 MASTER #: COA : N/A JOB ADDRESS: 159 TAHITI ST w JOB DESCRIPTION: RE-APP SEE #1999060068 JOB PHONE: (941)642-9500 SUBDIVISION #: 961' - Isles of Cauri No. 2 BLOCK: FLOOD MAP: 0801 ZONE: AE-1G ELEVATION: FOLIO :_0000052395960007, SECTION -TOWNSHIP -RAN 32 51 26 OWNER INFORMATION: CONTRACTOR INFORMATION: SEBRING. LESLIE W MARCO DOCK & LIFT. INC. 5660 EMERSON WAY 709 BALD EAGLE DRIVE INDIANAPOLIS, INCO32 462205377 FCC CODE: 700 - RE-APP RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION CODE: 10 / OTHER JOB VALUE: 8.000.00 TOTAL SOFT: MARCO ISLAND, FL 34145- CERTIFICATE #: 19251 SETBACKS FRONT: REAR: LEFT: RIGHT: SEWER: SEPTIC WATER: WELL CONTACT NAME: DUANE THOMAS CONTACT PHONE: (941)642-9500 LOT:285 PHONE: (941)642-9500 Per Collier County Ordinance No. 96-83. as amended, all work under the approved building permit shall comply with all applicable laws, codes, ordinances and additional stipulations and/or Conditions of Permit. The approved permit expires if work authorized is not commenced within six (6) months from date of issue as evidenced by the successful completion of the foundation inspections as stated in Ordinance No. 96-83 104.6.1.b as amended. Fee Resolution No. 96-594 provides for additional fees for failing to obtain permits prior to commencing construction. The permittee further understands that only.licensed contractors may be employed and that the_structure shafl not.be used or occup16d until{a.C�,ftfficate.of Occupancy is issued,_' NOTICE:= Ln addition to the requirements -.of this permit, there-may,be additional. restrictions applicable to this property th may be found in the public records of this county, and there may be additional permits required from other governmental entities such as water management districts, state agencies, or federal agencies. WARNING TO OWNER: YOUR FAILURE TO RECORD A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MAY RESULT IN YOUR PAYING TWICE FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO YOUR PROPERTY IF YOU INTEND TO OBTAIN FINANCING CONSULT WITH YOUR LENDER OR AN ATTORNEY BEFORE RECORDING YOUR NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. Packet Pg. 96 Sol3.B.e COLLIER COUNTY BOA D OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PERMIT PERMIT #: 1999060068 PERMIT DOCK VALID 068 ISSUED: 06-01-99 BY: GARRETT_S APPLIED 06-01-99 APPROVAL DATE: 06-01-99 MASTER #: 1999060068 COA N/A JOB ADDRESS: 159 TAHITI ST r JOB DESCRIPTION: INSTALL 23 REINFORCEMENT PILES JOB PHONE: (941)642-9500 u_ SUBDIVISION #: 961 -Isles of Capri No. 2 BLOCK: LOT:2B5 0 FLOOD MAP: 0801 ZONE: AE-10 ELEVATION: FOLIO #: 0000052395960007 TOWNSHIP -RANGE -SECTION: N L OWNER INFORMATION: CONTRACTOR INFORMATION: ~ r SEBRING, LESLIE W MARCO DOCK & LIFT, INC. (D 5660 EMERSON WAY 709 BALD EAGLE DRIVE U) r t INDIANAPOLIS, INCO32 462205377 MARCO ISLAND, FL 34145- LO 0 CERTIFICATE #: 19251 PHONE: (941)642-9500 00 ti 00 FCC CODE: 329 - STRUCT OTH THAN BLDG-POOL/SEAWALL/DOCK/F c CONSTRUCTION _CODE:_- 10 Cl) JOB VALUE: 8,000.00 TOTAL SQFT: c N J (L SETBACKS FRONT: REAR: LEFT. RIGHT: SEWER: SEPTIC WATER: WELL Cl) M O CONTACT NAME: DUANE THOMAS N CONTACT PHONE: (941)642-9500 N M Per Collier County Ordinance No. 96-83. as amended, all work under the approved building permit shall compl: 04 with all applicable laws, codes,. ordinances and additional stipulations and/.,or Conditions of .Permit. The a) approved permit expires if work authorized is not commenced within six (6) months from date of issue as evidenced by the successful completion of the .foundation inspections as stated in Ordinance No. 96-83 -fl4:5:1-as amende R�so3uti��To: 96=9-pr-ovdes-for=ac�dt�onaees`oiai3ingo=obtain-permits= prior to commencing construction. The permittee further understands, that only licensed contractors may be (L employed and that the structure shall not be used or occupied until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued. a) c 2 ca NOTICE: In addition to the requirements of this permit, there may be additional restrictions applicable to this property tY may be found in the public records of this county, and there may be additional permits required from other governmental entities such as water management districts, state agencies, or federal. agencies. E t R WARNING TO OWNER: YOUR FAILURE TO RECORD A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MAY RESULT IN YOUR PAYING TWICE FOR. IMPROVEMENTS TO YOUR PROPERT` IF YOU INTEND TO OBTAIN FINANCING CONSULT WITH YOUR LENDER OR AN ATTORNEY BEFORE RECORDING YOUR NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. Packet Pg. 97 3.B.f CD+ Permit Details Permit # Status Type Address Address # 2000090941 COED DOCK 159 TAHITI ST 136758 Master # Model ID Model Description WWP 2000090941 N COA # N/A Fcc Code 329 Applicant Type OA Contact Name Contractor PG Owner Name Estimated Value SEBRING, LESLIE W $8500.00 P Owner Address Fcc Code Description 5660 EMERSON WAY STRUCT OTH THAN BLDG- POOL/SEAWALL/DOCK/FENC Owner Owner Owner E/SCRN Address City Address State Address Zip Applicant Name INDIANAPOLI IN 462205377 S LES SEBRING OWNER/BUILDER Job Description REBUILD EXISTING DOCK Certificate # DBA Contact Phone (941)389-2274 Job Phone (941)389-2274 License # Subdivision # Subdivision Description SDP # 961 Isles of Capri No. 2 FLN Property Block Lot TAZ Status 0000052395960007 A 285 168 Section Township Range 32 51 26 Surveyor Survey Date Benchmark Benchmark Location Elevation Flood Elevation Flood Map Flood Zoning 0801 AE-10 5/28/2024 2:12:59 AM Packet Pg. 98 3.B.f Set Back Set Back Rear Set Back Left Set Back Lot Area Lot Acres Front Side Right Side Max Building Max FAR Planning Community Lot Width Lot Depth Height MI Set Back Special Zoning Atlas Page EXISTING DOCK 1632N Zoning Zoning Description Zoning Overlay RSF-4 SINGLE FAMILY: 4 DU/GROSS ACRE. Dates Applied On Approved Approved By Issued Issued By 9/13/2000 9/13/2000 FONTAINE_S 9/13/2000 GARRETT_S CO Coed By Finaled Finaled By Expiration 7/8/2003 DOWDELL_D 3/12/2001 Extended Expired Expired By Canceled Canceled By Expiration Building Project # Calculated Construction Code Construction Code Job Value Description $8500.00 10 OTHER Living Sqft Non -Living Total Sqft Building Building Building Sqft Height Width Length Bedrooms Baths Stories Habital Floors Elevators Escalators Residential Commercial Porch Additional Information Units Units ON NOC Plans Coastal COCC BCAI CCCL Required Construction Zone Y Y N Y N Radon Plan Alterations 5/28/2024 2:12:59 AM Packet Pg. 99 3.B.f N Enclosed Outside Total Parking Handicap Carport Parking Parking Spaces Parking Spaces Spaces Spaces N Permit Items Item Description Qty Amount EDCM DATA CONVERSION CHARGE - MINIMUM 3 $3.00 DA CF STRUCT STRUCTURAL FEE 8500 $66.00 S- Inspections Insp Code Description Request Date Schedule Insp Result Code Result Result 099 NOTICE OF 11/28/2000 952 90 APPROVAL 11/1 COMMENCEM ENT 115 FINAL 11/27/2000 DOCK 90 APPROVAL 11/1 BUILDING Comments Comment Fee Details Transaction # Code 220528 08BPNP 220528 08MFSG COes CONbr Type 234273 COMP Last Updated Last Updated By Description Amount Due Date Paid Amount Paid Status BLDG $66.00 9/14/2000 $66.00 POSTE PERMITS - NAPLES MICROFILM $3.00 9/14/2000 $3.00 POSTE SURCHARGE Status ISSUED Plan Reviews Review Review Status Release Department Remarks Issd Date 7/8/2003 View Details Due Date Release Date In Date 5/28/2024 2:12:59 AM Out Dal Packet Pg. 100 3.B.f Remarks TA CONVERSION LARGE - MINIMUM TRUCTURALFEE Date Inspector Remarks 28/2000 HARRISON_G 11/28/00 OR 2721 PG 1431/DMD 27/2000 HARRISON G D View Details D View Details to 5/28/2024 2:12:59 AM Packet Pg. 101 3.B.f SubContractors Type Status Certificate DBA Status 5/28/2024 2:12:59 AM Certificate # Packet Pg. 102 COLLIER COUNTY t BOAT OF COUNTY COMMISSI, JERS PERMIT PERMIT #: 2000090941 PERMIT DOCK .VALID 941 ISSUED: 09-13-00 BY: GARRETT S APPLIED 09-13-00 APPROVAL DATE: 09-13-00 MASTER #: 2000090941 COA N/A JOB ADDRESS: 159 TAHITI ST JOB DESCRIPTION: REBUILD EXISTING DOCK JOB PHONE: (941)389-2274 SUBDIVISION #: 961 -Isles of Capri No. 2 BLOCK: LOT:285 FLOOD MAP: 0801 ZONE: AE-10 ELEVATION: FOLIO #: 0000052395960007 SECTION -TOWNSHIP -RAN 32 51 26 OWNER INFORMATION: SEBRING, LESLIE W 5660 EMERSON WAY INDIANAPOLIS, IN 462205377 CONTRACTOR INFORMATION: CERTIFICATE #: PHONE: FCC CODE: 329 - STRUCT OTH THAN BLDG-POOL/SEAWALL/DOCK/F CONSTRUCTION CODE: 10 / OTHER JOB VALUE: 8,500.00 TOTAL SOFT: SETBACKS FRONT: REAR: LEFT: RIGHT: SEWER: SEPTIC WATER: WELL CONTACT NAME: OWNER/BUILDER CONTACT PHONE: (941)389-2274 Per Collier County Ordinance No. 96-83. as amended, all work under the approved building permit shall comply with all applicable laws, codes, ordinances and additional stipulations and/or Conditions of Permit. The approved permit expires if work authorized is not commenced within six (6) months from date of issue as evidenced by the successful canpletion of the foundation inspections as stated in Ordinance No. 96-83 104.6.1.b as amended. Fee Resolution No. 96-594 provides for additional fees for failing to obtain permits prior to commencing construction. The permittee further understands that only licensed contractors may be employed and that the structure shall not be used or occupied until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued. NOTICE: In addition to the requirements of this permit, there may be additional restrictions applicable to this property the may be found in the public records of this county, and there may be additional permits required from other governmental entities such as water management districts, state agencies, or federal agencies. WARNING TO OWNER: YOUR FAILURE TO RECORD A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MAY RESULT IN YOUR PAYING TWICE FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO YOUR PROPERTY IF YOU INTEND TO OBTAIN FINANCING CONSULT WITH YOUR LENDER OR AN ATTORNEY BEFORE RECORDING YOUR NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENTS Packet Pg. 003 Official Receipt - Collier County Board of County Commissioners CDPR1103 - Official Receipt Trans Number Date Post Date I Payment Slip Nbr 1220528 09/13/2000 4:08:52 PM 1 09/14/2000 I PT 2000090941 Address: 159 TAHITI ST Owner: SEBRING, LESLIE W COA #: N/A Permit Type: DOCK Job Desc: REBUILD EXISTING DOCK Applicant: LES SEBRING DBA: Swr Meter: Wtr Meter: Payor : LES SEBRING Fee Information Fee Code Description GL Account Amount Waived 08BPNP BLDG PERMITS - NAPLES 11313890032211000000 $66.00 08MFSG MICROFILM SURCHARGE 11313890034144200000 $3.00 I otal 1 $69.00 Payments Payment Code Account/Check Number Amount CASH $69.00 Memo: Collier County Board of County Commissioners CD -Plus for Windows 95/NT Total Cash $69.00 Total Non -Cash $0.00 Total Paid $69.00 Cashier/location: GARRETT_S / 1 User: FONTAINE S Printed:09/13/2000 4:09:19 PM Packet Pg. 104 COLLIER COUNTY •. "' A GOVERNMF,*7 Property _ALRF Aluminum Roof Over _AWNG Awnings - Residential _CHKE Chickee - S/F _CLST Combust Liquid Storage Tank _CRPT Carport/Wood/Aluminum/CBS _CTLR Temp Construction Trailer _DECK Wood Deck _DEMO Demolition _DOCK Dock & Davits ,_EXHD Exhaust Hood System _EXWL Exterior Wall Alteration _FALR Fire Alarm System _FPMP Fire Pump System _FRPF Fireproofing �FRWL Fire Barrier Wall _FSPK Fire Sprinkler System FSPS Fire StandPipe System RESIDENTIAL - USE / OCC CODE _998 - Express Residential Other Specify:_ __328 - Other Residential Buildings Shed / Carport I & 2 Family Sq/Ft�_ _329 - Structures other th�� a Idin s Pool /Seawall / ock Fen e Sq/Ft EXPRESS PERMIT No.:4_� APPLICATION FOR `JIN IG PEMIT COLLIER COUNTY, FLOKIDA 941-403-2400 Application Date: /' PP on / t 3 / U(� Approval Date:__K/ /�CSA _FNC Fire Suppression System SCWR Screen ROOM/Wood Roof _ _ FNCE Fence SDNG Sidin _GDWD Sliding Glass Doors/Windows — g(Vt ip-rap New/R /Wood _SEWL Seawall/Rip-rap/New/Repairs-Eng. Req. ____INPT Residential Interior Wall SHED S/F Storage Shed —IRRG Lawn Sprinklers _SHED Shingle/Composite Roofing _LPGP Propane Gas Piping ONLY SHTC Shutters - Commercial LPGT Propane Gas Tank System SHTR Shutters - Residential __MNEL Minor Electrical Work SLAB Concrete Slab _PLAL Plumbing Repairs/Alterations SLRH Solar Heating System PLNC Pilings - Commercial SPTK Septic Tank Installation/Repair _PLNG Pilings - Residential SWRT Sewer Tap _POOL S/F Swimming Pool/Spa TENT Tent Erection —PRMV Pre -moving Inspection —TENT Tile Roofing — REAC A/C Replacement TPOL Electrical Service _REFR Refrigeration _ _UGFS U/G Private Fire Service/Water Main _SCCG Screen Enclosure/Screen Roof BCOT Commercial Other -Doclk) NON-RESIDENTIAL - USE / OCC CODE _999 - Express Non -Residential Other Specify: _�._528 - Other Non -Residential Buildings Cooler / Freezer / Shed Specify: _529 - Structures other than Buildings Fence / Dish/ Seawall / Tank / Tower Roof Structure 1_-no /�J Construction City=2i , CC, u n aZ Lt ! vState:_Tnl Zip: u1 - 53�"1 Job Representative: Subdivision: l[ 1 Q n �'f. r Phone Number: (- (']) z5 _S22 Z ( t 3 - 22 t Section: `% c�C Township: / it Coop rw 4�' Contracted Value of Construction/1—rovement: $ 5 `1 Block; Lot/Parcel: '7- Unit: Z w Tract: General Location: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Property Owner of Record: LD nl i o � h Address: (5 9 cA(t �� 5 f ~! City. It State: F L Phone Number: 3( r) Z S y- g -7 I q y �8 9 - Z 2-l-.t 99 Notice of Commence —100 Footings _101 Pile Caps _102 Grade Beam _103 Slab _104 Tie Beam ,107 Sheathing Metal Fascia _108 Framing _I 10 Tie Down _.____I I I Roofing in Progress _115 Final Building _122 Spot Survey - 10 Days _129 Seawall/Engr. Cert. 133 Monolithic Slab _134 Final Roofing 200 Plumbing Rough 201 Tubset _203 Sewer Tap _204 Final Plumbing _205 Irrigation 300 Mechanical Rough A/C _301 Final Mechanical _400 Rough Gas 401 Final Gas Zoning: T.A.Z.: - Front: _501 Electric Rough 502 Final Electrical 503 Service Change _506 Underground Elect. _618 Final Fire - _619 Pollution Control 700 Pool Steel & Ground .701 Final Pool _702 Pool Deck _800 Right -of --Way �801 Site Drainage _803 Parking, Rear: L.Side: R.Side: REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE COUNTY DEPTS. Iuttt' ate Eee Zoning /Building Electric $ Engineering $ Fire Plan Review $ Fire Inspection $ Data Conversion $ 3.00 BCAI _ i vi.�LL Yr KmIT FEE $ This permit does not authorize construction or Installation WARNING f any strutturre or uttiil ty, abue or bellow ground, within any right-of-way or easement reserved for access, drainage or utility purposes. This restriction specifically prohibits fencing, sprinkler systems, landscaping -other than sod, signs, water, sewer, cable and drainage work therein. If such improvements are necessary, a separate permit for that purpose must be obtained from Project Review Services. (941-643-8471) OWNER -BUILDER D1SCLOSURE STATEMENT State Law and Collier County Ordinance requires construction Applicantrd if ctionto be done by licensed contractors. tIf you are applying for a permit under an exemption to that law, the exemption allows you, as the owner of the property, to act as your own contractor even though you do not have a license. You must supervise the construction yourself. You may build or improve a one -family or two-family residence or a farm building. The building must be for your own use and occupancy. It may not be built for sale or lease. If you Nell or lease a building you have built your self within one (1) year after the construction is complete, the law will presume that you built it for sale or lease, which is a violation of this -exception. Moreover, an owner builder applying for, or receiving more than one (1) building permit for the construction of a one -family or two-family dwelling in any three year period stall be prima fade evidence of building/ contracting without a license which is a violation of Collier County Code. It is your responsibility to make sure that people employed by you have licenses required by state law and by county or municipal license ordinances. Any person working on your building who is not licensed must work under your supervision and must be employed by you, which means that you must deduct F.I.C.A. and withholding tax and provide workers' compensation for that employee, all as prescribed bylaw. Your construction must comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, building codes, and zoning regulations. NOTICE: In addition to the re uirem_ ents of this no —it *h. ..... a encies. Applicant's Name/Company:, State Registration No.'(ifCo Social Security No. (if Owner Co. Tom' Certificate #: Phone:_.') �I I -38r-t -22 -7 y s P� Mil appncauon was subscribed before me this � ------ by �who is knot` I�r (, r- dayof 20 G O as identification, and who stated upon oath or affirms (circle one) that he/she bast m this building building permit application are true to the best of his/her knowledge, and that the work to be done is autho 'zed by the owner. __— permit application, that the information and statements in this a'"�"'�. Lynda E Wishart-White *JW*My Commission CC873141 1�t��jir'� Expires Se to be Notary Public m r 22, 2003 (SEAL. ABOVE) L n r~ Printed, typed, or stamped Packet Pg. 105 09/06/2000 16:04 9416429507 SEPTEMBER 6, 2000 COLLIER COUNTY 3301 TAMIA.MI TRAIL EAST NAPLES, FL 34112 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: MARCO DOCK THIS LETTER IS TO NOTIFY YOU THAT 1, LES SEBRING, THE OWNER AT 1S9 TAHITI ST, NAPLES, FL., DO HEREBY CONSTITUTE AND APPOINT BLAKE WISHART MY TRUE AND LAWFUL ATTORNEY -IN -FACT TO APPLY FOR/RECEIVE AND SIGN FOR A BUILDING PERMIT FOR A DOCK AT THE AFOREMENTIONED ADDRESS FROM THE COLLIER COUNTY BUILDING SERVICES EFFECTIVE SEPTEM13ER 6, 2000. THANK YOU. SINCERELY, LES SEBRING PAGE 3.B.f Packet Pg. 106 3.B.f OOLPHI 'CINCL[ .•—•p••. •fl\ Y'••i. \ \*. r.♦ .�., �' � 1 t t 1 1 ! u a': •�� ♦� ` � \, ti . yid, .l. \� \ \ w ., .�'• a4 Y wr `� �\ � L[i A ,I� 1. h �y � hi' \. � ti � w♦ � ��: ` r \ 4 . / .+ \ \ � ` , 5 OCR., ti \.•. �. `�' 'y \ � +r 11 \ • • ti ti 04 . • �\ •� s:. b T 7 t W w w rt AgBr�, ' ��:`u IIr• ' •1 \ ''t r4 `; 4 �. 04 ��\ � �s •{ � �.}a ffi J 1 i }' t i �� •1 i• It ti •+4w•%' f. lr ll,r. ' is J�•11 .P,` � �1 4, Ls Z\ '�y• �" `. �, p0� - .r .} _ .i it }.r' ,I r it i ) :�}, 1 .ri. t O,i t i.lF'PD 1 \. ISLAND t3 d .y .• ODJ I q i" ,L CD I I 3 I I G :rf .1 _ 1 ' I / ` • pP� ,�� -% M \ ti r'' CprP�. ♦ ,,. r N .I I I I Ili t �' i 5 `'� S \ 1 N . LP ' b `s, ` \, t- CD � r I. i 7 u �c 1 I L!� •ab^ ,,- 1• '0; 1' � � �� M i\ � CD rn t 's ISLAND tt •\ 1t�'\ `\ �•�' I✓'• }' i. `-�fil,�l�\7. 1S'i3 .��II II I'II'( +•'�t ,,'• 1 liT\`r •v% �d•'•F' ,.\ �• ��`O rY04 Vf1 O i1 +cam \\ `\. •,r' �`' [�_ ~ �. ~-��1 1 • I II �� r i t f M t �1 [ n� -�` 4 `• \ 7,F�6 h L USINBSS ISLANC ',N T• `� ,-'•1v •� S. �p" ti�t.� i� ISLAND VZ • L ' r • ••, r,• \\ C •s S \l f a ` �t• i i •s Lr J' C 19 ` • /� `- . i• i V I a Packet Pg. 107 IL 2(f- 55 NN CD IL 135 VAR CD cc ,vo CD DL-u alo, - Packet Pg. 108 I gUIlD1N� DEPZ • COP' -ZE.VIEWLD FOR CODE COMPLIANICE Ion i ng Engineering Building Electrical. Mechanical Gas Plumolng Structural ) Fire Prev. Fie- th I Packet P79 - 100 97 1 3.B.g PRFH2O230625: 1 COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PERMIT PERMIT #: PRFH2O23062581001 PERMIT TYPE: Building DATE ISSUED: March 13, 2024 BUILDING CODE IN EFFECT: FBC 7th Edition 2020 w/ 2023 sup3 JOB ADDRESS: 159 Tahiti ST, Naples FOLIO #: JOB DESCRIPTION: 3,289 SF LIVING - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE FINISHED FLOOR AT MIN. 9.00' N.A.V.D. Demo: PRBD20180636355 159 Tahiti ST, Naples, Lot 285 4 Bedrooms & 3 W.C. OWNER INFORMATION: TRAVISANO, PETER J JACQUELINE A TRAVISANO 10817 GARDEN RIDGE CT DAVIE, FL 33328 I:R7C11101WAV619"mWel0NW61FA SETBACKS: FRONT: 25' REAR: 25' P / 10' A(if less than 4' abve top of seawall) LEFT: 7.5' RIGHT: 7.5' FLOOD ZONE: AE SEWER: Septic WATER: New CONTRACTOR INFORMATION: CERTIFICATE #: TOSCANA HOMES INC C25335 801 ANCHOR RODE DRIVE SUITE 203A NAPLES, FL 34103 (239) 261-0600 Packet Pg. 110 3.B.g INSPECTION JOB CARD To schedule inspections call 239-252-3726 or visit https://cvportal.colliercountyfl.gov/cityviewweb PRFH2O2306251 SETBACKS: FRONT: 25' REAR: 25' P / 10' A(if less than 4' a bve top of seawall) LEFT: 7.5' RIGHT: 7.5' SPECIAL: FLOOD ZONE: FZAE INSPECTION OUTCOME COMMENTS 100 - Footings To include the Utility Footing Rebar (UFR) 102 - Grade Beam 103 - Floating Slab Soil Treatment 104 - Tie Beam 106 - Columns 107 - Truss/Sheathing/Bucks 108 - Framing All rough trade inspections must be passed prior to scheduling. 109 - Insulation 111- Dry-in/Flashing 115 - Building Final 118 - Lintel Beam 119 - Fill Cells 120 - Flood Vent Relief 11 smart vent 1540-510 121 - Elevated Structural Deck 124 - Steel In Stairs 125 - Elevator Pit 131- Tenant Sep/ Rated Drywall 5/8" Type X Garage Ceiling 134 - Roofing Final 136 - Impact Glass 151- Shearwall/Nailing 152 - Shearwall/Water Barrier 153 - Shea rwall/Stucco Lath Packet Pg. 111 3.B.g PRFH2O2306251 154 - Soffit Coverings In progress Please do NOT complete Soffit installation prior to inspection. 200 - Plumbing Underground 201- Plumbing Rough -in When applicable a shower pan liner test is required. 203 - Sewer Tap 204 - Plumbing Final 300 - A/C Rough 301- A/C Final 501- Electrical Rough 502 - Electrical Final 505 - Temporary Power Residential 508 - TV/Telephone Rough 509 - TV/Telephone Final 801- Site Drainage Type I Stormwater Plan, signed and sealed by a PE. DiazDidier 12/26/2023 8:52 AM 802 - Landscaping 805 - Septic in Progress 810 - Exotic Vegetation Removal 813 - Final Septic 814 - Erosion/Silt The 814 - Erosion/Silt must be passed before any other inspection are scheduled. OPEN CONDITIONS Condition Type: Condition Description: Informational NOTICE OF CLEARING RESTRICTIONS: The issuance of a building permit for a single-family dwelling allows up 1 one (1) acre of native vegetation to be cleared. Clearing more than one (1) acre may be allowed for accessory structures and requires a separate Vegetation Removal Permit. Properties located in the following zoning district overlays may not be allowed to clear one (1) acre: Rural Fringe Mixed Use District (RFMU), Big Cypres Area of Concern (ACSC), and Special Treatment Overlay (ST). There may be additional restrictions related to clearing native vegetation and impacts to wetlands or protected species found on the property. State and Federal agency permits may be required. Contact the Growth Management Department?s Environmental Services at (239) 252-2400 for additional information. Inspection Hold Notice of Commencement: Upload to the condition on the portal. Informational BDT ? Blower Door Test will be uploadable after the PASS of the 109 insulation inspection. Per Plans Envelope Leakage no greater than 6.00 ACH50 U_ 0 0 0 c c� N L d m L s H rn 0 r 0 m o r N O O 0 M N O N J a M M 0 rn N 2 a 0 o LO N 0 0 M N O N 2 u. a r E L W a U_ Q Packet Pg. 112 3.B.g PRFH202306251 Informational Energy Calculation Summary Sheet will be uploadable after the PASS of the 109 insulation inspection. Informational FEMA - All equipment must be above flood plus one foot. Any materials used below flood level must comply with FEMA regulations a Informational LL A Survey is required and must verify that improvement(s) meet setbacks, easements, and elevation requirements per Chapter 62, Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. Throughout the duration of the c permit, please review the survey conditions for when to upload the survey. C c CO Hold Soil Compaction Test. Upload to the condition on the portal. a u Inspection Hold Permit is on inspection hold until the following deferred items are submitted as a revision: ***Truss Layout i for Floors and Roof*** CO Hold Engineering Certificate/Letter (Structural). Upload to the condition on the portal. L U, Engineers Letter/Certificate of Compliance and Inspection Reports required for pilings. a CO Hold until receipt of Engineers Report. L T Informational - All Auxiliary Permits must obtain Certificate of Completions (C.C.) - Satisfy all Required Conditions, including but not limited to approval of uploaded documents. - Payment of All Outstanding Fees r Informational Pool to be permitted separately. c a CO Hold Pursuant to the Floodplain Management Ordinance 2019-01 a Non -conversion Agreement shall be recorded c the public records of Collier County, FL prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy or certificate of CN_ completion for this permit. Once the Non -Conversion Agreement is recorded, upload to the condition on the a portal. a a For questions, contact the Floodplain Management section at 239-252-2942 or email a BuildingFloodDocs@colliercountyfl.gov. The form can be downloaded here: https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/home/showdocument?id=84981 a Informational Use the form located at a https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/home/showdocument?id=105797&t=63840398498455837O to request Permit extensions, cancellations, and changes/withdrawals of Contractors, Subcontractors and Qualifiers. a Instructions are provided with the form. Change/withdrawal of contractor does not apply to self -issued Lr permits. Contact Building Permit Resolution Services at 239-252-2493 for assistance completing the form. c Submit the form by clicking the Browse button below. C" CO Hold At the time of permit application, the permitted structure is in the special flood hazard area. An Under Construction Elevation Certificate is required within 10 days of passing a 103 or 133 inspection of slab or othE LL foundation system. Prior to obtaining County approval of the Under Construction Elevation Certificate, the a permit holder?s construction activities are at his/her own risk. Under Construction Elevation Certificates mus E verify the slab meets minimum elevations per the Florida Building Code and Chapter 62, Collier County Code a Laws and Ordinances (e.g., BFE +1 or 18? above the crown of the road, whichever is higher, and the elevatioi a established by the SFWMD permit). u c Flood zone: AE; BFE: 8 ft NAVD; COR: 3.11' NAVD (SP); 3 story SFH; Ground floor (S/P/A) with Garages Iw pt C E 6.83' NAVD(S1) & Storage with 11 smart vents 1540-510 (200 sqf cov ea) total 2200 sqf vs 2147 sqf required; X, Prop. Foyer FIFE: 9' NAVD(S1); 1st Living floor: 18.17' NAVD; FIR Materials below flood; Equipment Pad at 9 ' NAVD; Elevator compliance with TB#4. 4 CO Hold > Elevation Certificate c a E Flood zone: AE; BFE: 8 ft NAVD; COR: 3.11' NAVD (SP); 3 story SFH; Ground floor (S/P/A) with Garages Iw pt ( f 6.83' NAVD(S1) & Storage with 11 smart vents 1540-510 (200 sqf cov ea) total 2200 sqf vs 2147 sqf required; } Prop. Foyer FIFE: 9' NAVD(S1); 1st Living floor: 18.17' NAVD; FIR Materials below flood; Equipment Pad at 9 ' G NAVD; Elevator compliance with TB#4. Inspection Hold Sub Contractor (Electrical) Upload to the condition on portal. Inspection Hold Sub Contractor (Mechanical) Upload to the condition on portal. Packet Pg. 113 3.B.g PRFH2O230625: Inspection Hold I Sub Contractor (Plumbing) Upload to the condition on portal. CO Hold I Sub Contractor (Septic) Upload to the condition on portal. Inspection Hold I Sub Contractor (Roofing) Upload to the condition on portal. NOTE: If you are unable to schedule your inspection, please contact the inspection desk at 252-2400. NOISE ORDINANCE: Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances 54-92(f) Construction Sound. NOISE LIMITATIONS ; in effect at all times. Work permitted, RESIDENTIAL Areas — 6:30 AM to 7:00 PM Monday thru Saturday; NON-RESIDEN' Areas (more than 500 feet from Residential Area) 6:OOAM to 8:OOPM Monday thru Saturday. No Work on Sundays or Holida RADIOS, LOUDSPEAKERS, ETC. — Must not disturb peace, quiet and comfort of neighboring inhabitants. FREE CABLE LOCATIONS — Call 48 Hours prior to digging/FPL 434-1222/UTS 1-800-542-0088/PalmerCATV 783-0638 and all other appli utilities. Per currently adopted building code ordinance, as it may be amended, all work must comply with all applicable laws, codes, ordinances, and any additional stipulations or conditions of this permit. This permit expires if work authorized by the permit commenced within six (6) months from the date of issuance of the permit. Additional fees for failing to obtain permits prior to commencement of construction may be imposed. Permittee(s) further understands that any contractor that may be employed be a licensed contractor and that the structure must not be used or occupied until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued. NOTICE: PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OF ASBESTOS PRODUCTS OR THE DEMOLITION OF A STRUCTURE, FEDE] AND STATE LAWS REQUIRE THE PERMITTEE (EITHER THE OWNER OR CONTRACTOR) TO SUBMIT A NOTIC] THE INTENDED WORK TO THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (DEP). FOR MORE INFORMATION, CONTACT DEP AT (239) 344-5600. NOTICE: In addition to the conditions of this permit, there may be additional restrictions applicable to this property that ma; found in the public records of this county, and there may be additional permits required from other governmental entities suc water management districts, state agencies, or federal agencies. WARNING TO OWNER: YOUR FAILURE TO RECORD A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MAY RESULT IN YOUR PAYING TWICE FOR IMPROVEMEN TO YOUR PROPERTY. A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MUST BE RECORDED AND POSTED ON THE JOB SITE BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION. IF YOU INTE TO OBTAIN FINANCING, CONSULT WITH YOUR LENDER OR AN ATTORNEY BEFORE RECORDING YOUR NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. Packet Pg. 114 AlCROWN OF ROAD I A2PER COMMENT LETTER A3REVISE DRIVEWAY 3.B.g ZEASIONS BY: 6/29/2023 A. L 8-18-2023 DW 02-20-2024 DW [WATERWAY I A2 LEGAL LOT --------- 285 UNIT ---------- 2 ISLES OF CAPRI SUBDIVISION 159 TAHITI STREET COLLIER COUNTY, FL. DRAINAGE NOTE: EXISTING LOT IS LEVEL WITH SLIGHT PITCH TOWARD STREET. SIDE YARDS TO DRAIN INTO EASEMENTS ALONG PROPERTY LINES; PITCH REAR YARD TOWARDS EASEMENT; PITCH FRONT YARD TOWARDS SWALE AT RIGHT-OF-WAY. DRAINAGE INDICATED BY ARROWS: LANDSCAPING NOTE: PER COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE DIVISION 2.4, A MINIMUM OF (2) CANOPY TREES ARE REQUIRED: LOT AREA = 8,433 SF 0 2,500 SF PER TREE (MAX) = 3.37 4 REQUIRED TREES MINIMUM OF (2) TREES TO BE 10 FT IN HEIGHT, 1 3/4" CALIPER @ 12" ABOVE GRADE, AND 4 FT SPREAD; BALANCE TO BE MINIMUM OF 8 FT HEIGHT, 1 1/2" CALIPER, 3 FT SPREAD; ONE PALM TREE MAXIMUM TO SATISFY REQUIRED LANDSCAPING. SUGGESTED SPECIES: FICUS, GUMBO -LIMBO, LIVE OAK, AND MAHOGANY; MINIMUM OF (3) TREES TO BE NATIVE TO SOUTH FLORIDA. PROJECT INFORMATION BUILDING OCCUPANCY: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (GROUP R3) LIVE LOADS (PSA: FIRST FLOOR 50 PSF - SECOND FLOOR - N/A ING AREA: FIRST FLOOR - 2,060 SF - SECOND FLOOR - 1 TOTAL AREA (AC) 3.485 SF TOTAL AREA (NON -AC) 3,489 SF TOTAL AREA UNDER ROOF 6,974 SF FEMA FLOOD ZONE: AE 8 PER FIRM MAP OF 05-16-2012 GRADE ELEV. OF LOWEST FLR. 6.83' N.A.V.D. LOCATED (& GARAGE ELEVATION OF FIRST HABITABLE FLR. 9.00' N.A.V.D. HEIGHT OF BUILDING ABOVE GRADE: 39'-8" NO. OF STORIES 3 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION (FBC CLASSIFICATION):V UNPROTECTED PARKING SUMMARY: SPACES REOUIRED 2 SPACES PROVIDED 2 NOTE: THESE PLANS WERE PREPARED IN COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION R301 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE -RESIDENTIAL (FBC, 7th EDITION) NOTE: ALL WORK PERFORMED IN RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL COMPLY WITH DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR THE SUBDIVISION AND AS INDICATED ON R.O.W. PERMIT TO BE ISSUED BY COLLIER COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. FLOOD ZONE CONVERSION TABLE NAVD + 1.30' = NGVD SEPTIC SYSTEM CRITERIA TOTAL LIVING (A/C) S.F. AREA ------- 3,485 SF TOTAL # OF BEDROOMS ---------------- 4 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 10 20 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 10 ft. 510 0 w � w 0a Q O U W U Z Z w U w aw w 2z Oa UZ 00 ZLu aw Z> ww m 02 0 w U)ry wN aw OH 0 z LLJa Z w a W W F i z ' oLu 00 Q J V co > N N =_ Q a Q wDLu o DATE: 02-20-2024 SCALE: 1" = 10'-0" WN: DAVE W JOB: 2022-743 SHEET: Al LL Y O c O F_ L s F_ 0 m ti 00 N 0 0 0 M N O N J a M M 0 N OF 13 s 3.B.g REAR ELEVATION SCALE: 3/16" = P-0" .�� pF fiLo CRAV//z�p'� AR 93288 V %A. ED AR DATE: 05-2023 SCALE: 3/16" = P-0" DRAWN: A.LE A JOB: 2022-743 SHEET: A2 P.; LL Y V O G O C N R H a+ N d to F- a) 0 m 00 T N O O O M N O N J a M M O rn N OF 13 s 3.B.g BRONZE STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF LEFT SIDE ELEVATION SCALE: 3/16" = P-0" RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" CA, pF �Lp'.4 R� CRAV/L,/pR 93288 'ED ARG� DATE: 05-2023 SCALE: 1/4" = P-0" DRAWN: A.LE A JOB: 2022-743 ISHEET: A3 U. Y V O G O c �a N R H N d CD Lo 0 m co T N O O O m N O N J a M m O rn N OF 13 SHEETS Packet Pg. 117 I IO MECH.PAD AT 9.00' NAV� IO GENERATOR DECK SPA POOL ALL MATERIALS BELO BASE 1 FLOOD ELEVATION 5 ERIAL OF PER R322.1.8 OF FBC-RESIDENTIAL ALL ELEMENTS OF THE ELEVATOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ® FEMA TECHNICAL BULLETIN #4 STAIR DESIGN 4 R @ 6.25" = 2'-1" 3 T @ 11" EACH , UffiffigN"M ---------- N I HYDROSTATIC VENT CALCJ. FLOOD REQUIREMENTS FOR OPENI1 GS =1 SQUARE INCH PER 1 SQUARE FOaTT I OF ENCLOSED AREA 12,147 SQUARE INCHES REQUIRED PROVIDED ON MINIMUM OF TWO WALL PLANES INSTALL INSECT SCREENS AS REQUIRED WALL HATCH LEGEND MASONRY WALL- - - - - - FRAME WALL --------- INT. LOAD BEARING WALL ......... ..:::: NOTE: INTERIOR LOAD BEARING WALLS WILL BE LOCATED ON PLANS AFTER THE ROOF TRUSS ENGINEERING HAS BEEN COMPLETED. 10 COVERED LANAI ALL MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT FOR THE ELEVATOR SHALL BE LOCATED ABOVE 9.00' NAVD Ai O ELEVATOR FOYER(a) 9.00'NAVD FOYER 2-STORY VOLUME STAIR DESIGN 15 R @ 7.33" = 9'-2" 14 T @ 10" EACH ENTRY F STAIR WIDTH STAIR RAILING DETAIL* SCALE = 1/2" = P-0" DECK i I I o q Ai m GARAGE m HANDRAIL TO WITHSTAND 200# CONCENTRATED LOAD =z X. GUARDRMLING DETAIL* SCALE = 1/2" = P-0" * DETAILS NOT INTENDED TO PORTRAY ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN INTENT; DETAIL IS TO SHOW CODE COMPLIANCE PURPOSES ONLY STORAGE c SMART VENT #1540-510 CALC S . 11 SMART VENTS 200 SQ. IN. EA. 2,200 SQ. IN. TOTAL PROVIDED GROUND FLOOR PLAN W/ NOTES SCALE: 3/16" = F-0" AREA CALCULATIONS FOYER 196 SF 1st FLOOR LIVING 2,060 SF 2nd FLOOR LIVING 1,229 SF TOTAL LIVING 3,485 SF ENTRY 56 SF GARAGE/STORAGE 2,147 SF COVERED LANAI 358 SF FRONT TERRACE #1 125 SF FRONT TERRACE #2 125 SF COVERED LANAI #2 358 SF COVERED TERRACE 320 SF TOTAL ROOF AREA 6,974 SF POOL DECK 1,219 SF ZE AiPER COMMENT LETTER NOTE: EXTERIOR DOORS AND WINDOWS NOT USING IMPACT -RESISTANT GLAZING SHALL BE SHUTTERED WITH METAL PANELS, TO BE STORED IN GARAGE AND IDENTIFIED AS TO APPLICABLE OPENING; ALL HARDWARE TO BE PROVIDED FOR INSTALLATION (MANUFACTURER TO PROVIDE ENGINEERING & SPECS FOR SHUTTERS.) DOOR SCHEDULE MARK QTY. SIZE TYPE MANUFACTURER EXTERIOR OPENING PROTECTION 1 1 6'-0" x 8'-0" (2) 3080 DECORATIVE WROUGHT IRON ENTRY DOORS PCIW IMPACT GLASS 2 2 12'-0" x 8'-0" O.H. GARAGE DOORS CLOPAY RATED FOR 170 M.P.H. 3 1 20'-0" x 8'-0" ALUMN. FRAMED SGD W/ (4)60"x96" PANELS MARVIN IMPACT GLASS 8'- " ALUMN. FRAMED SGD W/ (2)48"x96" PANELS MARVIN IMPACT GLASS 5 1 3-0" x 8'-0" 3080 1 HR RATED SOLID CORE SWING DOOR PROVID F C O ING D VICE P R CTION 716 OF 2014 FBC 4 3'-W_ _x8'' 3080 INT. SWING DOORS RATED FOR 170 M.P.H. 7 2 64" x 8'-0" (2)2880 EXT. FRENCH DOORS MARVIN IMPACT GLASS 8 1 15'-0" x 8'-0" ALUMN. FRAMED SGD W/ (3)60"x96" PANELS MARVIN IMPACT GLASS 9 1 12'-0" x 8'-0" ALUMN. FRAMED SGD W/ (3)48"x96" PANELS MARVIN IMPACT GLASS 10 1 2'-8" x 8'-0" INT. SWING DOOR(1HR RATED W/SELFCLOSING DEVICE) 11 8 2'-8" x 8'-0" INT. SWING DOOR 1 5 2'-4" x 8'-0" INT. SWING DOOR 13 1 74' x 8'-0" INT. POCKET DOOR 1 1 20'-0" x 10'-0" ALUMN. FRAMED SGD W/ (4)60"x120" PANELS MARVIN IMPACT GLASS 1 2 8'-0" x 10'-0" ALUMN. FRAMED SGD W/ (2)48"x120" PANELS MARVIN IMPACT GLASS 16 CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY THE SIZE OF MASONRY OPENINGS REQUIRED WITH WINDOW MANUFACTURER. PROVIDE MATCHING SCREENS FOR OPERABLE UNITS NOT ENCLOSED BY POOL DECK SCREENING ALL HF,AD HF.TGHTS ARF, MF.ASTTRF,D FROM THE FLOOR THF, WINDOW TS LOCATF,D ON. ITNLF.SS OTHF,RWTSF. NOTED WINDOW SCHEDULE MARK QTY. SIZE TYPE MANUFACTURER EXTERIOR OPENING PROTECTION HEAD HEIGHT A 1 2'-0" x T-3" FIXED CASEMENT MARVIN IMPACT GLASS T-4" B 2 2'-0" x 3-0" FIXED CASEMENT MARVIN IMPACT GLASS 8'-0" C' 1 6-0" x 7-0" (2) 3070 FIXED CASEMENTS MARVIN IMPACT GLASS 10'-0" D 2 3-1" x 64' 37"x76" CASEMENT MARVIN IMPACT GLASS 8'-0" E 1 8'-0" x 8'-4" (2) 48"x76" FIXED CASEMENTS W/96"x24" TRANS MARVIN IMPACT GLASS 10'-0" F 1 64' x 8'-4" 32"x76" CASEMENTS W/64"x24" TRANSOM MARVIN IMPACT GLASS 10'-0" G H 1 5'-0" x 2'-0" TRANSOM MARVIN IMPACT GLASS 8'-0" 1 6-0" x 3-3" (2) 36"x39" FIXED CASEMENTS MARVIN IMPACT GLASS 8'-8" K 6 2'-4" x 2'-4" FIXED CASEMENT MARVIN IMPACT GLASS 8'-0" L 1 2'-4" x 2'-0" FIXED CASEMENT MARVIN IMPACT GLASS 8'-0" P Q S THESE PLANS HAVE BEEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION R301 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE - RESIDENTIAL (FBC, 7th EDITION); USING THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA: A) "MINIMUM DESIGN LOADS FOR BUILDINGS AND OTHER STRUCTUR SCE 7-16 USING "C & C" METHOD) BASIC �B) WIND COLLIER COUNTY B -SE ON FIGURPER E 16 PREPARED BY 6A) C) WIND EXPOSURE: EXPOSURE "C" D) INTERNAL PRESSURE COEFFICIENT: +/- 0.18 / ENCLOSED E) BUILDING RISK CATEGORY: II ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL R DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS CONTAINED IN SECTION R322 FLOOD RESISTANT CONSTRUCTION OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE � pF �L co. GF2AVI��p � C7 AR 93288 ��• C-) c'STFREo � f 1 F. 'OT P I.PP. �A jCE T DOUBLE OO OO SINK OID COOKTOP Ole — — — O.H. CABINETS BUILD -DOWN CLG. TO 1 BUILD -DOWN CLG. TO CLG. HEIGHT A.F.F. 1P-4" CLG. HEIGHT A.F.F. — — — — — — — — — — — — — —1I_4" 7 ---------1 I 1 COVERED LANAI#2 — — — — — — — — � � I 12'-0" CLG. HEIGHT I DINING RM. I 1 I I BUILD -DOWN CLG. To 12'-0" CLG. HEIGHT 11'-4" CLG. HEIGHT A.F.F. 1 I BUILD -DOWN CLG. TO l 11 A" ( T 11 T1 L'T/1T1T A U U 1 I411 L-------- I BUILD -DOWN CLG. TO 11'-4" CLG. HEIGHT A.F.F. KITCHEN BUILD -DOWN CLG. TO 1P-4" CLG. HEIGHT A.F.F. REF. 1 FRZR. D.O. BUILD -DOWN CLG. TO — — — I1'4' CLG. HEIGHT A.F.F. — — — — — — I I I I GREAT RM. 12'-0" CLG. HEIGHT 1 I BUILD -DOWN CLG. TO 11 11'4' CLG. HEIGHT A.P.P. A V MECH. 1 F I i TAI DESI N 2 R @ 8 1 "— — — — — — — BUILD -DOWN CLG. TO — — 1 T @ 10" EACH 11'-4" CLG. HEIGHT All O.H. CABINETS Up DOWN BAR TMMT,TM 10'-0" CLG. HEIGHT 11 r — — — — — I I I 1 WIC I BEDROOM #31 1 STEP CLG. FROM 10'-0" 1 ROD SHELF TO I F-0" A.F.F. LAV. W L-----J BATY 10'-0" CLG. HEIGHT 11 0 FRONT TERRACE 10'-0" CLG. HEIGHT PA: ELEViVT R I� TUB/ SHWP. OPEN TO FOYER BELOW 1st FLOOR PLAN W/ NOTES SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" LTCR 11 ID IW z I BEDROOM #1 1 z I 12'-0" CLG. HEIGHT FSHWR I Y WC m BATH L — — — — — — - BUILD -DOWN CLG. TO #1 LAV. 11'4' CLG. HEIGHT A.F.F. O 11 LNDRY. RM. 10'-0" CLG. HEIGHT TANKLESS W 11 r _ 10'-0"CLG. HEIGHT I 1 BEDROOM #2 1 as"TEP CLG. FROM 10'-0" 1 TO 11'-0" A.F.F. L-----J 10'-0" CLG. HEIGHT FRONT TERRACE 10'-0" CLG. HEIGHT "lIC �11 I I WALL HATCH LEGEND MASONRY WALL ------ FRAME WALL-------- OF FLOC -RAV/[�"o-9 ca 2 . AR 93288 C) ARG�� 0 m m r m u LL (m�T e DATE: 05-2023 SCALE: 3/16" = V-0" DP\.AWN: A.LE A JOB: 2022-743 SHEET: AJ) OF 13 SHEETS Packet Pg. 119 AiPER COMMENT LETTER I 3.B.g 8-18-2023 ID 0 0 ROD & SHELF SHOWER COVERED TERRACE - - - ---SN IV 1 9'-8" CLG. HEIGHT I I II — — — DS SINGBLE RE TUB I I I 8 ---� II 1 - 9'8" CLG. HEIGHT 9'-8" CLG. HEIGHT II 1 1 — — — — — — — — — — � — �--�---�--� I I WIC I 1 0 I I I I I II II I i1 MASTER BATHI---III-- 1 1 9'-8" CLG. HEIGHT 1 LAV. L- 1 1 I II II I 11 _ SITTING ROOM 1 I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 I M TER SUITE 1 1 STEP CLG FROM 9'-8" TO 1 1 9'-8" CLG. HEIGHT 1 I 1 TO 10'-8" A.F.F. 1 1 TO P:CL A.F.F. ROM 9'- " O 1 11 13 1 1 I II II I 11 ANKLESSW.H. 1 1 --H---H--� 11 1 1 1 wIC 1 MECH. RM. © 1 1 I I I I I I MINI SPLIT l CONDENSER 1 1 W LL== — _ _ 1 9'-8" CLG. HEIGH 11 I I I I I I AT 9.00' NAVD I ROD & SHELF DOWN © — — — — — — — 1 1 L ---- 9'-8" CLG. HEIGHT 1 1 �C� SUCTLESS MINI PLIT AT 10 0 All Ij �I I� �I I� �I I� �I I�Dil H2(111111 =111illys �I 0 �I �� II A, 0-------------- I L--------------- ------------ H ------------ --------------- 2ND FLOOR PLAN W/ NOTES SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" WALL HATCH LEGEND MASONRY WALL ------- FRAME WALL -------- `,�� OF 1 Lp39 CRAV//��0 ,9 ca _�_ 2• AR 93288 G� VTbED ARG�`� I1 — 00 m m on DATE: 05-2023 SCALE: 3/16" = V-0" DRAWN: AIE A JOB: 2022-743 SHEET: A6 r u m LL Y V O 0 O c �a rn H r a� L �a F- a) r 0 m ti 00 r N O 0 0 M N O N J d M M O o� OF 13 SHEETS Packet Pg. 120 3.B.g 68'-8" 4 3" 28'-6" " 1 '-8" 1 LT 1 '-5" 1 '-5" — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — O a = 10'-81 " 30'-01 " 7-4" - " " �s o o I = m F 't �o m - - _ 0t 11 0' "- - o� 81t _ II 17 3" 3" 1 '-0" I IT II 1 17_ C; _ �� 1 '-0" " '- 3" 3" 3" 3" �� -6" 1 '-8" 1 '-8" '-6" '-6" GROUND FLOOR PLAN - DIMENSIONS SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" OF FLOC RAVI[O.9 I 00 m m m rT� DATE: 05-2023 SCALE: 3/16" = P-0" TN: A.LE1A OB: 2022-743 u m U. Y V O a O C m N R H r O L �a Lo r 0 m ti Go r N O O O M N 0 N J d M M O rn N AR 93288 ice, C.) ARG�� SHEET: A7 OF 13 SHEETS 3.B.g Ist FLOOR PLAN - DIMENSIONS SCALE: 3/16" = V-0" No 00 m m m DATE: 05-2023 SCALE: 3/16" = V-0" DRAWN: AIE A JOB: 2022-743 r u m U. Y V O a O C N R H L �a Lo r 0 m ti Go r N O O O M N O N J d M M O on N AR 93288 c'sT�ED ARG�`� SHEET: A8 OF 13 SHEETS Packet Pg. 122 3.B.g I F II II II --- II II II II - = Cr II II II o II II II IL L — g;(" O" 0'_1" 13- ' 131- ' " "' 1 E 1 '_5" 1, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - rl _ " _ 4,, rr d,-4,,7 t 16-10" - I I I 18" " - 7-0 --- L --I �— „14" of I F-------- 17- I = \"r�4 I I II II II II I--I f-----I--� I = - I I I I� cc - „ir = - - = I I ' I I , — -A)- l� — }'— — — J — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ------------- ------------- %nd FLOOR PLAN - DIMENSIONS SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" T-7 N II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II �I -RAVI44�O-;9 — — , AR 93288 C.7 ED ARG�`� I1 — 00 m m on DATE: 05-2023 SCALE: 3/16" =1'-0" DRAWN: AIE A JOB: 2022-743 r u m LL Y V O 0 O c �a N H r a� L �a F- a) r 0 m ti r N O O 0 M N O N J a. M O o� N SHEET: A9 OF 13 SHEETS Packet Pg. 123 PANEL BOX A: 200 AMP MAIN BRKR. IN 200 AMP PANEL BOX W/ 42 SPACES TWO - #3 CU ONE - #4 CU ONE - #6 CU 70� 400 AMP COMBO METER; 200 AMP MAIN WITH 22 KW S SPACES 100 AMP GENSET TRANSFER SWITCH --, 00 BRKR 200 BRKR O SUB -PANEL FOR THREE - 4/0 AL TWO - #3 CU POOL EQUIPMENT;--", QUIPMENT; ONE - # 2 AL #2 CU ONE - #4 CU 90 AMP MAIN BREAKER IN PANEL BOX B: ONE - #6 CU 100 AMP RATED PANEL BOX W/ 12 SPACES 200 AMP MAIN BRKR. IN 200 AMP PANEL BOX W/ 42 S PACE S ELECTRICAL RISER DIAGRAM N.T.S. ELECTRICAL LEGEND HANGING/ SURFACE MOUNTED LED FIXTURE O 3.5" RECESSED LED FIXTURE 9 5.25" RECESSED LED FIXTURE WALL -MOUNTED LED G 5" RECESSED INCANDESCENT EYEBALL FIXTURE O LED PIN LIGHT HOLLYWOOD WALL -MOUNTED FIXTURES A.C.L. ABOVE CABINET LIGHTING U.C.L. UNDER CABINET LIGHTING T.K.L. TOE KICK LIGHTING FLUORESCENT LIGHTING FLUORESCENT LIGHTING W/ DIFFUSER STANDARD 110 VOLT DUPLEX OUTLET SINGLE 110 VOLT OUTLET FOR APPLIANCES HALF -SWITCHED 110 VOLT DUPLEX OUTLET ® CEILING OR FLOOR MOUNTED 110 VOLT OUTLET SINGLE 220 VOLT OUTLET $D STANDARD SWITCH; DIMMER SWITCH a $ 4 THREE-WAY OR FOUR-WAY SWITCH -01 CABLE TELEVISION PH> TELEPHONE OR FAX MACHINE JACK -0 cK Mss DOORBELL AND CHIMES ROUGH -IN FOR CEILING FAN (WIRING AND BRACING) SEE MANUFACTURER'S SPECS RE: RHEOSTATS EXHAUST FAN (WITHOUT LIGHT UNLESS NOTED) O SD SMOKE DETECTOR W/ CARBON MONOXIDE SENSOR TO BE INTERCONNECTED W/ BATTERY BACKUP (VERIFY LOCATIONS PER CODES) CIRCUIT PANEL (WITH RATING IN AMPS) ELECTRIC METER (VERIFY DROP LOCATION W/ UTILITY CO.) - _ _ - r❑ A/C DISCONNECT SWITCH HOSE BIBB VT WATER-RESISTANT FIXTURES AND OUTLETS GARAGE FLOOR PLAN - ELECTRICAL GFi OUTLETS ON GROUND FAULT INTERRUPTER CIRCUIT SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" NOTE: ALL ELECTRICAL WORK SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL CODES AND ORDINANCES IN ADDITION TO THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE (NEC-2017 EDITION) ELECTRICAL SERVICE SHALL BE LOCATED ABOVE THE FLOOD PLAIN PER FEMA REGULATIONS. NOTE: ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR OR SECURITY SYSTEM CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO ENSURE THAT ALL DOORS & WINDOWS PROVIDING DIRECT ACCESS FROM THE HOME TO THE POOL WILL BE EQUIPPED WITH AN EXIT ALARM THAT HAS A MINIMUM SOUND PRESSURE RATING OF 85 DECIBLES AT 10 FEET. ALARM TO BE HARDWIRED OR OF THE PLUG IN TYPE, PER THE REQUIREMENTS DESCRIBED IN FL. STATUTES SECTIONS 515.21 - 515.37, THE RESIDENTIAL SWIMMING POOL SAFETY ACT. NOTE: PROVIDE ELECTRICAL & WATER SERVICE TO SEAWALL AT DOCK AREA. NOTE: CONSULT OWNER AS TO LOCATION OF CENTRAL STEREO UNIT, SPEAKER/ VOLUME CONTROLS, AND SECURITY SYSTEM COMPONENTS. NOTE: ALL 120-VOLT, SINGLE PHASE, 15- AND 20-AMP BRANCH CIRCUITS SUPPLYING OUTLETS INSTALLED IN DWELLING UNIT IN FAMILY ROOMS, DINING ROOMS, LIVING ROOMS, PARLORS, LIBRARIES, DENS, SUN ROOMS, RECREATION ROOMS, CLOSETS, HALLWAYS, OR SIMILAR ROOMS OR AREAS SHALL BE PROTECTED BY A LISTED ARC -FAULT CIRCUIT INTERRUPTER, COMBINATION TYPE INSTALLED TO PROVIDE PROTECTION OF THE BRANCH CIRCUIT IN COMPLIANCE WITH ARTICLE 210-12, N.E.C. 2017 EDITION #4 CU TWO - #3 CU ONE - #4 CU ONE - #6 CU AR93288 � �isTFh'ED ARG�`� 3.B.g WE l 0 L tt131\_ — — — — — — — I FWRr WR WR L SPA DOCK AND REAR \ \ IIJAANDSCAPE LIGHTING TO BE \ OPERA '-*Q+A L+NR-Si'�TE-M 7- - - - \ i�EMOT ; VERIFY LOCATION W/ - - - - QWNE13/CONTRACTOR I I III II Lj \ II I I I I �S �I I WU' L — — — — — J No IIII I I I II 42" I I \ TO SWITCH TO SWITCH BELOW BELOW T &WR AWR Ist FLOOR PLAN - ELECTRICAL SCALE: 3/16" = I'-0" ,�� pF FLOC �;�� CRAV//4/o';9 AR 93288 G�S,T LED 1 on DATE: 05-2023 SCALE: 3/16" = V-0" DRAWN: AIE A JOB: 2022-743 SHEET: All r LL Y V O 0 O fC LL r r a� L t �a F- a) 0 m ti 00 N 0 0 0 M N 0 N J a. M O o� OF 13 SHEETS Packet Pg. 125 3.B.g II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II � II II II II II II II II II II II �L -ram ------------ � - - - - - - - - - - H --------- - �I II II I� .......... ----------------- 2nd FLOOR PLAN - ELECTRICAL SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" — — — J H PEE OF FL p'Qi CRAVt4�/o-9 AR 93288 QED AR No 00 m m m rT� Uj W DATE: 05-2023 SCALE: 3/16" = P-0" WN: A.LEiA OB: 2022-743 SHEET: Al2 OF 13 SHEETS r u m U. Y V O a O C N R H r O L �a Lo r 0 m ti Go N O O O M N O N J d M M O on 3.B.g ROOF PLAN SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" BEARING HEIGHTS 30.17BEARING r T T Ty TT yT- -IWJJ FLO CRAW44�o-9 AR 93288 ••� kL G� c'��FRED ARG�`� I 00 m m m DATE: 05-2023 SCALE: 1/4" = F-0" DRAWN: UE A JOB: 2022-743 SHEET: A13 r u m LL Y V O a O C N R H r O L �a F- a) LO r 0 m ti Oo r N O O O M N O N J d M M O o) N OF 13 SHEETS Packet Pg. 127 TABLE OF CONTENTS 3.B.g -Vi�D AD AT Ei. 6 SId 1,000 GAL. PROPANE TANK Al------------------ SITE PLAN A2 ------------------ FRONT AND REAR ELEVATIONS A3------------------ LEFT AND RIGHT SIDE ELEVATIONS A4------------------ GROUND FLOOR PLAN- NOTES A5------------------ 1 ST FLOOR PLAN- NOTES A6------------------ 2ND FLOOR PLAN- NOTES A7------------------ GROUND FLOOR PLAN- DIMENSIONS A8------------------ 1ST FLOOR PLAN- DIMENSIONS A9------------------ 2ND FLOOR PLAN- DIMENSIONS A10---------------- GROUND FLOOR PLAN- ELECTRICAL All---------------- 1ST FLOOR PLAN- ELECTRICAL Al2---------------- 2ND FLOOR PLAN- ELECTRICAL A13---------------- ROOFPLAN- WALL SECTIONS S1------------------ FOUNDATION PLAN S2------------------ FOUNDATION SECTIONS S3------------------ GROUND FLOOR BEAM PLAN S4------------------ 1 ST FLOOR BEAM PLAN S5------------------ 2ND FLOOR BEAM PLAN LEGAL S6------------------ GENERAL NOTES LOT --------- 285 S7------------------ GENERAL NOTES UNIT ---------- 2 ISLES OF CAPRI SUBDIVISION 159 TAHITI STREET COLLIER COUNTY, FL. DRAINAGE NOTE: EXISTING LOT IS LEVEL WITH SLIGHT PITCH TOWARD STREET. SIDE YARDS TO DRAIN INTO EASEMENTS ALONG PROPERTY LINES; PITCH REAR YARD TOWARDS EASEMENT; PITCH FRONT YARD TOWARDS SWALE AT RIGHT-OF-WAY. DRAINAGE INDICATED BY ARROWS: LANDSCAPING NOTE: PER COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE DIVISION 2.4, A MINIMUM OF (2) CANOPY TREES ARE REQUIRED: LOT AREA = 8,433 SF o 2,500 SF PER TREE (MAX) = 3.37 4 REQUIRED TREES MINIMUM OF (2) TREES TO BE 10 FT IN HEIGHT, 1 3/4" CALIPER @ 12" ABOVE GRADE, AND 4 FT SPREAD; BALANCE TO BE MINIMUM OF 8 FT HEIGHT, 1 1/2" CALIPER, 3 FT SPREAD; ONE PALM TREE MAXIMUM TO SATISFY REQUIRED LANDSCAPING. SUGGESTED SPECIES: FICUS, GUMBO -LIMBO, LIVE OAK, AND MAHOGANY; MINIMUM OF (3) TREES TO BE NATIVE TO SOUTH FLORIDA. PROJECT INFORMATION BUILDING OCCUPANCY: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (GROUP R3) LIVE LOADS (PSA: FIRST FLOOR 50 PSF - SECOND FLOOR - N/A BUILDING AREA: FIRST FLOOR - 2,060 SF - SECOND FLOOR - 1,229 TOTAL AREA (AC) 3,289 SF TOTAL AREA (NON -AC) 3,489 SF TOTAL AREA UNDER ROOF 6,974 SF FEMA FLOOD ZONE: AE 8 PER FIRM MAP OF 05-16-2012 GRADE ELEV. OF LOWEST FLR. 6.83' N.A.V.D. LOCATED (& GARAGE ELEVATION OF FIRST HABITABLE FLR. 9.00' N.A.V.D. HEIGHT OF BUILDING ABOVE GRADE: 39'-8" NO. OF STORIES 3 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION (FBC CLASSIFICATION):V UNPROTECTED PARKING SUMMARY: SPACES REOUIRED 2 SPACES PROVIDED 2 NOTE: THESE PLANS WERE PREPARED IN COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION R301 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE -RESIDENTIAL (FBC, 7th EDITION) NOTE: ALL WORK PERFORMED IN RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL COMPLY WITH DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR THE SUBDIVISION AND AS INDICATED ON R.O.W. PERMIT TO BE ISSUED BY COLLIER COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. FLOOD ZONE CONVERSION TABLE NAVD + 1.30' = NGVD SEPTIC SYSTEM CRITERIA TOTAL LIVING (A/C) S.F. AREA------3,485 SF TOTAL # OF BEDROOMS ---------------- 4 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 10 20 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 10 ft. 00 0 W NW Oa ZO 0 U U_ U Z 0 U WW oW 2Z ZQ OZ UO 00 Z LL aW Z> WW m �U) 02 0 W U00 WU) aW O H 0 z Fa Z Ix a J 00 Z C" =Y'L`, 2U o M 11111111,,,,,,,, �,,, W rrrrrirrrrrr,�V �,, _ Z -U' LLZ v`, li 6- �% `� '� LL W v Z) J 00o �J _ p� z O N ¢ O?Z = YLu !!1 !o 2 Z Job c PR LJi IIIII11111\\\\\\\\\\ DATE: 06-09-2023 CALF: 1" = 10'-0" WN: DC / DW JOB: 2023- 743 SHEET: Al LL Y V O G O A L F_ L to F_ 0 m ti 00 N O 0 0 M N O N J a eM M 0 j F K & Associates1, , In c. OF 13 s 3.B.g REAR ELEVATION SCALE: 3/16" = P-0" DATE: 05-2023 SCALE: 3/16" = P-0" m JOB: 2022-743 SHEET: A2 P.; LL Y V O G O C N R H a+ N d to F- a) 0 m 00 T N O O O M N O N J a M M O rn N OF 13 s 3.B.g BRONZE STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF 12 6 41.33' NAVD ROOF BEARING HEIGHT 31.67' NAVD 2ND STORY FIN. FLOOR HEIGHT 30.17' NAVD ROOF BEARING HEIGHT— — — — — — — — 28.17' NAVD ROOF BEARING HEIGHT— — — — — — — — i 18.17' NAVD 1ST STROY FIN. FLOOR HEIGHT — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 9.00'NAVD RE . FLOOD ELEVATION LEFT SIDE ELEVATION ---------------------------------------------------------------- SCALE: 3/16" = P-0" BRONZE STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF - 12 6� 41.33' NAVD ROOF BEARING HEIGHT -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - IL -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 31.67' NAVD 2ND STORY FIN. FLOOR HEIGHT 30.17' NAVD ROOF BEARING HEIGHT — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 28.17' NAVD ROOF BEARING HEIGHT — — C 18.17' NAVD 1ST STROY FIN. FLOOR HEIGHT off — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 9.00'NAVD REQ. FLOOD ELEVATION RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION ------------------------------------------------------------------- SCALE: 3/16" = P-0" DATE: 05-2023 SCALE: 1/4" = P-0" DRAWN: A.LE A JOB: 2022-743 SHEET: A3 U. Y V O G O c �a N R H N a� CD Lo 0 00 ti T N O O O m N O N J a M m O rn N OF 13 SHEETS Packet Pg. 130 3.B.g DFCK I �O MECH. PAD AT 9.00' NAND 0 GENERATOR CTARACTF SPA STAIR DESIGN 4 R @ 6.25" = 2'-l" 3T@11"EACH L7 HYDROSTATIC VENT CALCSI. FLOOD REQUIREMENTS FOR OPENINGS =1 SQUARE INCH PER 1 SQUARE FOOT OF ENCLOSED AREA 12,147 SQUARE INCHES REQUIRED PROVIDED ON MINIMUM OF TWO WALL PLANES INSTALL INSECT SCREENS AS REQUIRED _ I I WALL HATCH LEGEND MASONRY WALL ------ FRAME WALL -------- INT. LOAD BEARING WALL o0000000000000000 NOTE: INTERIOR LOAD BEARING WALLS WILL BE LOCATED ON PLANS AFTER THE ROOF TRUSS ENGINEERING HAS BEEN COMPLETED. POOT , COVERED ALL MATERIALS BELOW BASE FLOOD ELEVATION SHALL BE OF FLOOD RESISTANT MATERIALS PER R322.1.8 OF FBC-RESIDENTIAL PE � IIIIIII � 11 FOYER 9.00'NA FOYER 2-STORY VOLUME STAIR DESIGN 15 R @ 7.33" = 9'-2" 14 T @ 10" EACH ENTRY GROUND FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" I STAIR WIDTH DFCK ------ ��9 Al STAIR RAILING DETAIL* SCALE = 1/2" = P-0" HANDRAIL TO WITHSTAND 200# CONCENTRATED LOAD GUARDRAILING DETAIL* SCALE = 1/2" = 1'-0" * DETAILS NOT INTENDED TO PORTRAY ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN INTENT; DETAIL IS TO SHOW CODE COMPLIANCE PURPOSES ONLY r4--------- O STORAGE CTARACTF P4= c SMART VENT #1540-510 CALCS. 11 SMART VENTS c 200 SQ. IN. EA. _ 2,200 SQ. IN. TOTAL PROVIDED NOTES AREA CALCULATIONS FOYER 196 SF 1st FLOOR LIVING 2,060 SF 2nd FLOOR LIVING 1,229 SF TOTAL LIVING 3,485 SF ENTRY 56 SF GARAGE/STORAGE 2,147 SF COVERED LANAI 358 SF FRONT TERRACE #1 125 SF FRONT TERRACE #2 125 SF COVERED LANAI #2 358 SF COVERED TERRACE 320 SF TOTAL ROOF AREA 6,974 SF POOL DECK 1,219 SF NOTE: EXTERIOR DOORS AND WINDOWS NOT USING IMPACT -RESISTANT GLAZING SHALL BE SHUTTERED WITH METAL PANELS, TO BE STORED IN GARAGE AND IDENTIFIED AS TO APPLICABLE OPENING; ALL HARDWARE TO BE PROVIDED FOR INSTALLATION (MANUFACTURER TO PROVIDE ENGINEERING & SPECS FOR SHUTTERS.) DOOR SCHEDULE MARK QTY. SIZE TYPE MANUFACTURER EXTERIOR OPENING PROTECTION 1 1 6'-0" X 8'-0" (2) 3080 DECORATIVE WROUGHT IRON ENTRY DOORS PCIW IMPACT GLASS 2 2 12'-0" X 8'-0" O.H. GARAGE DOORS CLOPAY RATED FOR 170 M.P.H 3 1 20'-0" X 8'-0" ALUMN. FRAMED SGD W/ (4)60"X96" PANELS MARVIN IMPACT GLASS 4 1 8'-0" X 8'-0" ALUMN. FRAMED SGD W/ (2)48"X96" PANELS MARVIN IMPACT GLASS 5 1 6-0" X 8'-0" (2)3080 INT. SWING DOORS 6 5 3-0" X 8'-0" 3080 INT. SWING DOOR RATED FOR 170 M.P.H 7 2 64" X 8'-0" (2)2880 EXT. FRENCH DOORS MARVIN IMPACT GLASS 8 1 15'-0" X 8'-0" ALUMN. FRAMED SGD W/ (3)60"X96" PANELS MARVIN IMPACT GLASS 9 1 12'-0" X 8'-0" ALUMN. FRAMED SGD W/ (3)48"X96" PANELS MARVIN IMPACT GLASS 10 1 2'-8" X 8'-0" INT. SWING DOOR(1HR RATED W/SELFCLOSING DEVICE) 11 8 2'-8" X 8'-0" INT. SWING DOOR 1 5 2'-4" X 8'-0" INT. SWING DOOR 13 1 2'-4" X 8'-0" INT. POCKET DOOR 1 1 20'-0" X 10'-0" ALUMN. FRAMED SGD W/ (4)60"X120" PANELS MARVIN IMPACT GLASS 1 2 8'-0" X 10'-0" ALUMN. FRAMED SGD W/ (2)48"X120" PANELS MARVIN IMPACT GLASS 16 CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY THE SIZE OF MASONRY OPENINGS REQUIRED WITH WINDOW MANUFACTURER. PROVIDE MATCHING SCREENS FOR OPERABLE UNITS NOT ENCLOSED BY POOL DECK SCREENING All HFAD HFT0HTR ARF MFARTiRFD FROM THE FT,OOR THE WINDOW TR T,OCATF.D ON. ITNT,F.RR OTHFRWTRF NOTV.D WINDOW SCHEDULE MARK QTY. SIZE TYPE MANUFACTURER EXTERIOR OPENING PROTECTION HEAD HEIGHT ® 1 2'-0" X 4'-3" FIXED CASEMENT MARVIN IMPACT GLASS T-4" B 2 2'-0" X 3-0" FIXED CASEMENT MARVIN IMPACT GLASS 8'-0" CO 1 6'-0" X 7-0" (2) 3070 FIXED CASEMENTS MARVIN IMPACT GLASS 10'-0" OD 2 3-1" X 64" 37"X76" CASEMENT MARVIN IMPACT GLASS 8'-0" E 1 8'-0" X 8'-4" (2) 48"X76" FIXED CASEMENTS W/96"X24" TRANS MARVIN IMPACT GLASS 10'-0" F 1 64" X 8'-4" 32"X76" CASEMENTS W/64"X24" TRANSOM MARVIN IMPACT GLASS 10'-0" QH 1 5'-0" X 2'-0" TRANSOM MARVIN IMPACT GLASS 8'-0" 1 6-0" X 3-3" (2) 36"X39" FIXED CASEMENTS MARVIN IMPACT GLASS 8'-8" K 6 2'-4" X 2'-4" FIXED CASEMENT MARVIN IMPACT GLASS 8'-0" QL 1 2'-4" X 2'-0" FIXED CASEMENT MARVIN IMPACT GLASS 8'-0" P S THESE PLANS HAVE BEEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION R301 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE - RESIDENTIAL (FBC, 7th EDITION); USING THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA: A) "MINIMUM DESIGN LOADS FOR BUILDINGS AND OTHER STRUCTURES" (ASCE 7-16 USING "C & C" METHOD) B) BASIC WIND SPEED: 169 M.P.H. (PER MAPS PREPARED BY COLLIER COUNTY BASED ON FIGURE 1606A) C) WIND EXPOSURE: EXPOSURE "C" D) INTERNAL PRESSURE COEFFICIENT: +/- 0.18 / ENCLOSED E) BUILDING RISK CATEGORY: II ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS CONTAINED IN SECTION R322 FLOOD RESISTANT CONSTRUCTION OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE F—� DATE: 05-2023 SCALE: 3/16" = P-0" m JOB: 2022-743 SHEET: A4 U. Y V O G O C to cv CD H N d t H Lo m ti co rl O 0 CD m N O N J a m m O rn OF 13 s 3.B.g BUILD -DOWN CLG. TO 11'-4" CLG. HEIGHT A.F.F DINING RM. 12'-0" CLG. HEIGHT I L— — — — — -- BUILD-DOWN CLG. TO 11'-4" CLG. HEIGHT A.F.F o DOUBLE O O INK COOKTOP 010 ---------- BUILD-DOWN CLG. TO 11'-4" CLG. HEIGHT A.F.F. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — COVERED LANAI#2 12'-0" CLG. HEIGHT L— — — — — — — — — — — — BUILD -DOWN CLG. TO 1 11'-4" CLG. HEIGHT A.F.F. — — — — — — — J BUILD -DOWN CLG. TO 11'-4" CLG. HEIGHT A.F.F. 7777777 11 F-------- — — — 7 A/V MECH. z I I m z GREAT RM. 1 m SHWR 12'-0" CLG. HEIGHT 1 1 WC KITCHEN BUILD-DOWNNL TO 1P-4" CLG. HEIGHT A.F.F. IAI DESI N REF. FRZR. 1 T @ 10" EACH — — O.H. CABINETS D O O.H. CABINETS UP 10'-0" CLG. HEIGHT 11 F — — — — — PANTRY Q I ELEVATOR WIC 1 I BEDROOM #31 — J �P,7D TO 1 -0" A.F.F. OM 10'-0" £I SHELE 0 O I 0 -0" CLG. HEIGHT J L;\V. WC TUB/ 11 BATH SHWR #2 OPEN TO FOYER BELOW 7 O CO I FRONT TERRACE 1 10'-0" CLG. HEIGHT BUILD -DOWN CLG. TO 11'-4" CLG. HEIGHT A.F.F. BUILD -DOWN CLG. TO 11'-4" CLG. HEIGHT A.F.F. F- — — — — — — 7 BEDROOM #1 12'-0" CLG. HEIGHT 1 y z BATH L------J BUILD -DOWN CLG. TO 1 # 1 LAV. 1 V-4" CLG. HEIGHT A.F.F. O O - — — — — — — — I • I I WN CLG. TO Bl'-4" CLG HEIG T A.F.F. 11 DOWN BAR WIc I wII lst FLOOR PLAN W/ NOTES SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" I LC.R] Q 11 11 1 ID 10'-0" CLG. HEIGHT IW LNDRY. RM. 10'-0" CLG. HEIGHT TANKLESS W.H BEDROOM #2 STEP CLG. FROM 10'-0" TO 11'-0" A.F.F. L-----� 10'-0" CLG. HEIGHT 0 FRONT TERRACE 10'-0" CLG. HEIGHT WALL HATCH LEGEND MASONRY WALL ------ FRAME WALL-------- DATE: 05-2023 SCALE: 3/16" = P-0" DRAWN: A.LE A JOB: 2022-743 SHEET: A5 OF 13 SHUTS Packet Pg. 132 3.B.g � 0 D & SHELF SHOWER\FF 1 ABLEING II TUB 1 II 1 I WIC OMASTER BATH 1 9'-8" CLG. HEIGHT 1 LAV. L- II — II 9'-8" CLG. HEIGHT I 13 ANKLESS W.H. 1 WIC 1 MECH. RM. ROD & SHELF COVERED TERRACE 9'-8" CLG. HEIGHT _ — — — — — 9'-8" CLG. HEIGHT I SITTING ROOM STEP CLG FROM 9'-8" TO TO 10'-8" A.F.F. I I I -- — — — — — — — — - 9' 8" CLG. HEIGHV O 2ND FLOOR PLAN W/ NOTES SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" "CLG. HEIGHT F — II — P II J II II MI I TER SUI IE ST tP CLG FROM 9'- " O TO ll'-8" A.F.F. I II II I 11 I II II II II 9'-8" CLG. HEIGHT DUCTLESS MINI SPLIT AT 10'-0" A.F.F N I II I II I II II II II II II II II II II II II MINI SPLIT CONDENSER AT 9.00' NAVD I II WALL HATCH LEGEND MASONRY WALL ------ FRAME WALL-------- I- 1 an DATE: 05-2023 SCALE: 3/16" = I'-0" DRAWN: All A JOB: 2022-743 r u m LL Y V O a O c �a N H r a� L m F- a) L0 r 0 m ti 0 N 0 0 0 M N 0 N J d M M O o) SHEET: A6 OF 13 SHEETS Packet Pg. 133 3.B.g 68'-8" 4 6'-5" 8'-611 1 1_8" 111 11 " 1 1 5" n 1 5❑ n " n — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — = — — — — — — — = 11 O a — 11 11 CC g„ CC - Y 10'-81 " 30'-01 " " o = I - m= m f= l01_ " = _ II 11 II 11 r 11 1 8" _ �� m ot_ " _ - 4n �� — S, _ pn — — — I I IIIT-O — — — I _ �i _ = _ - 1 1_011 41_ ❑ - 1_011 �]1_ �1 1J " 31_ ❑ 31_ " - 41_ 11 ']1_ �1 J ']1 _ 11 J1-6" '_]1_ " J I_611 1 1_QII „ 1 1_8" 1 ❑ t 11 '_L�ii11 1 GROUND FLOOR PLAN - DIMENSIONS SCALE: 3/16" = P-0" v1 W DATE: 05-2023 SCALE: 3/16" = P-0" m JOB: 2022-743 SHEET: A7 P.; LL Y V O G O C L F— L to F- a) 0 m 00 T N O O O M N O N J a M M O rn N OF 13 s 3.B.g lst FLOOR PLAN - DIMENSIONS SCALE: 3/16" = P-0" DATE: 05-2023 SCALE: 3/16" = P-0" m JOB: 2022-743 SHEET: A8 P.; LL Y V O G O C N R H a+ N d to F- a) 0 m 00 T N O O O M N O N J a M M O rn N OF 13 s 3.B.g 0,_1„ 131- 13'- " T „ 1 '-5" 1 -5" „51 , It r LT II II II I� II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II �— CDII �I I I I I , ,, ,, „ , ,, I 7,_2„ I , ,, „ „ , Ir Ir -- ---- '-1— — — — — — — �"— — — — — — — — ,_�, --- --J --— — — — — — — II II II II 2nc� FLOOR PLAN - DIMENSIONS SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" _ lit I 4,_ „ I - I I N I I II II I I II II m _ I I I = = = Y V O O c �a N H r a� L r— rn r 0 m ti O N O 0 0 M N O N J M M O o� DATE: 05-2023 SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" DRAWN: A.LE A JOB: 2022-743 SHEET: A9 LL a. m OF 13 SHEETS Packet Pg. 136 3.B.g GARAGE FLOOR PLAN - ELECTRICAL SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" PANEL BOX A: 200 AMP MAIN BRKR. IN 200 AMP PANEL BOX W/ 42 SPACES TWO - #3 CU ONE - #4 CU ONE - #6 CU FO-0 SUB -PANEL FOR POOL EQUIPMENT; 90 AMP MAIN BREAKER IN 100 AMP RATED PANEL BOX W/ 12 SPACES T.K.L. t) $D $ 3 $ 4 PH> CHIMES B OSD r-❑ HB WR GFI 400 AMP COMBO METER; 200 AMP MAIN WITH 22 KW 8 SPACES,,,100 AMP GENSET TRANSFER SWITCH ---- THREE - 4/0 AL ONE -#2AL #2 CU PANEL BOX B:--" 200 AMP MAIN BRKR. IN 200 AMP PANEL BOX W/ 42 SPACES TWO - #3 CU ONE - #4 CU ONE - #6 CU ELECTRICAL RISER DIAGRAM N.T.S. ELECTRICAL LEGEND HANGING/ SURFACE MOUNTED LED FIXTURE 3.5" RECESSED LED FIXTURE 5.25" RECESSED LED FIXTURE WALL -MOUNTED LED 5" RECESSED INCANDESCENT EYEBALL FIXTURE LED PIN LIGHT HOLLYWOOD WALL -MOUNTED FIXTURES ABOVE CABINET LIGHTING UNDER CABINET LIGHTING TOE KICK LIGHTING FLUORESCENT LIGHTING FLUORESCENT LIGHTING W/ DIFFUSER STANDARD 110 VOLT DUPLEX OUTLET SINGLE 110 VOLT OUTLET FOR APPLIANCES HALF -SWITCHED 110 VOLT DUPLEX OUTLET CEILING OR FLOOR MOUNTED 110 VOLT OUTLET SINGLE 220 VOLT OUTLET STANDARD SWITCH; DIMMER SWITCH THREE-WAY OR FOUR-WAY SWITCH CABLE TELEVISION TELEPHONE OR FAX MACHINE JACK DOORBELL AND CHIMES ROUGH -IN FOR CEILING FAN (WIRING AND BRACING) SEE MANUFACTURER'S SPECS RE: RHEOSTATS EXHAUST FAN (WITHOUT LIGHT UNLESS NOTED) SMOKE DETECTOR W/ CARBON MONOXIDE SENSOR TO BE INTERCONNECTED W/ BATTERY BACKUP (VERIFY LOCATIONS PER CODES) CIRCUIT PANEL (WITH RATING IN AMPS) ELECTRIC METER (VERIFY DROP LOCATION W/ UTILITY CO.) A/C DISCONNECT SWITCH HOSE BIBB WATER-RESISTANT FIXTURES AND OUTLETS OUTLETS ON GROUND FAULT INTERRUPTER CIRCUIT NOTE: ALL ELECTRICAL WORK SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL CODES AND ORDINANCES IN ADDITION TO THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE (NEC-2017 EDITION) ELECTRICAL SERVICE SHALL BE LOCATED ABOVE THE FLOOD PLAIN PER FEMA REGULATIONS. NOTE: ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR OR SECURITY SYSTEM CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO ENSURE THAT ALL DOORS & WINDOWS PROVIDING DIRECT ACCESS FROM THE HOME TO THE POOL WILL BE EQUIPPED WITH AN EXIT ALARM THAT HAS A MINIMUM SOUND PRESSURE RATING OF 85 DECIBLES AT 10 FEET. ALARM TO BE HARDWIRED OR OF THE PLUG IN TYPE, PER THE REQUIREMENTS DESCRIBED IN FL. STATUTES SECTIONS 515.21 - 515.37, THE RESIDENTIAL SWIMMING POOL SAFETY ACT. NOTE: PROVIDE ELECTRICAL & WATER SERVICE TO SEAWALL AT DOCK AREA. NOTE: CONSULT OWNER AS TO LOCATION OF CENTRAL STEREO UNIT, SPEAKER/ VOLUME CONTROLS, AND SECURITY SYSTEM COMPONENTS. NOTE: ALL 120-VOLT, SINGLE PHASE, 15- AND 20-AMP BRANCH CIRCUITS SUPPLYING OUTLETS INSTALLED IN DWELLING UNIT IN FAMILY ROOMS, DINING ROOMS, LIVING ROOMS, PARLORS, LIBRARIES, DENS, SUN ROOMS, RECREATION ROOMS, CLOSETS, HALLWAYS, OR SIMILAR ROOMS OR AREAS SHALL BE PROTECTED BY A LISTED ARC -FAULT CIRCUIT INTERRUPTER, COMBINATION TYPE INSTALLED TO PROVIDE PROTECTION OF THE BRANCH CIRCUIT IN COMPLIANCE WITH ARTICLE 210-12, N.E.C. 2017 EDITION #4 CU TWO - #3 CU ONE - #4 CU ONE - #6 CU 110 co m U0 cm 61 m CST DATE: 05-2023 SCALE: 3/16" =1'-0" m OB: 2022-743 SHEET: A10 OF 13 SHLI 3.B.g f)sD 1-41 WP. WR WR \ \ I — �---- db OL, SPA, DOCK AND REAR t4ANDSCAPE LIGHTING TO BE \ OPERA D�-Y �� LfNY�—SY�TE�`I � �— — — — � / �� — — — — — — � TM(T URIEY LOCATION W/WNEI/CON CTOR II \ I db �SDdb �—--��----/----- 4GF1I — — L4GI3 � O n I I BC i ng�/ I IIII i I 11L ;FII — — — — — — TO SWITCH TO SWIM BELOW BELOW 4� GFT / 1st FLOOR PLAN - ELECTRICAL SCALE: 3/16" = P-0" 1 an DATE: 05-2023 SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" DRAWN: AIE A JOB: 2022-743 u m LL Y V O 0 O cc F— r a� L �a F- a) L0 0 m ti 00 N 0 0 0 M N O N J a. M O o� SHEET: All OF 13 SHEETS Packet Pg. 138 3.B.g I� II II II II II II II II II II II II II II I� z� i 2nd FLOOR PLAN - ELECTRICAL SCALE: 3/16" = P-0" N II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II �I I 00 m m m W DATE: 05-2023 SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" RAWN: AIE JOB: 2022-743 SHEET: Al2 r u m LL Y V O a O C N R H r O L �a F- a) L0 r 0 m ti 00 N O O O M N O N J d M M O o� OF 13 SHEETS 3.B.g ROOF PLAN SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" BEARING HEIGHTS 30.17BEARING r T T Ty TT yT- -IWJJ I 00 m m m DATE: 05-2023 SCALE: 1/4" = F-0" DRAWN: UE A JOB: 2022-743 SHEET: A13 r u m LL Y V O a O C N R H r O L �a F- a) L0 r 0 m ti 00 r N O O O M N O N J d M M O o) N OF 13 SHEETS Packet Pg. 140 3.B.g r l 4' 11 11 11 11 11 11 1' 61_ " 61_ " 61_ " 1_ " I I �`\ F_ — III I I I L_ I I I I B 11 L II � III '" F I 1 1' I I 11 , — � — —-1011 rigI � I III ELEV. 6.67'NAVD 111 1 I ' B 1 F_ —1 I I L__J 1_ n F_ � F_ � F_ � I I I I I I L__-1 L__J L__J 7' 211 61_ 11 61_ _ � � � � � � I t' 1' D " " y = I - - " n I g'_ '1 I I E - I- I !12'-8" - -' I D I — — — — '--- - - - D-LL II II I n II C C - II II I � II II I — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — I I I _1' 1 ' 7" I I_ K I K VB ELEV. 6.67'NADB I I K K — 1 D I I" I E B — — — — — — — — I I I I -------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - i — 10- ' — --- — 10- — IU_ --- n - - -�- 0 O— I I I I =, I I 1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ---- � 1' 17 17 1-7---- --_ _1' QO LA II o I 1 '011 DROP FOOTER 16" BET\VEEN PILINGS I I TO ALLOT- FOR ELEVATOR ELEV. 7.0' NAVD K K G I ELEV. 7.0' NAVD II _ n n n n n 11 1 '0" I I '_ n 111 I G I _ o CO - �— -- N NI I I I I ELEV. 5.83' N �) I ' I I --IL---1 �'- ----==F T-- Tj= ELEV.9.00'NAVp I �I y K I I K 7 I I 1 G' I I III 811 D I I I I I ELEV. 6.83' NAVD n ELEV. 8.67' NAVD = I I _ _ _ _ H .1 — — - C _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 16'_4" - — — — — 1 ----------- I I I = — — — — _j � oo 1 I N T 1 I I = II I I I - G I I ELEV. 6.83' NAV G C — I _ o N oo Ily ------- G -' I I I C I G � _I = - ' G — _ _ _ ' 8 I I - -, _ - _ I = I _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 411 1-411 3' 16'_4" 1 11 1 1 311 31 1_411 411 1_311 11 - 1011 ' 1' 8 31 _ " 11 " 11 31 _ 1' 11 1_611 4 1_81' 1_61' 681-811 HYDROSTATIC VENT CALCS. FLOOD REQUIREMENTS FOR OPENINGS =1 SQUARE INCH PER 1 SQUARE FOOT OF ENCLOSED AREA 2,147 SQUARE INCHES REQUIRED PROVIDED ON MINIMUM OF TWO WALL PLANES INSTALL INSECT SCREENS AS REQUIRED SMART VENT #1540-510 CALCS . 11 SMART VENTS 200 SQ. IN. EA. 2,200 SQ. IN. TOTAL PROVIDED TABLE OF CONTENTS 51------------------ FOUNDATION PLAN 52------------------ FOUNDATION SECTIONS 53------------------ GROUND FLOOR BEAM PLAN 54------------------ 1ST FLOOR BEAM PLAN 55------------------ 2ND FLOOR BEAM PLAN 56------------------ GENERAL NOTES S 7------------------ GENERAL NOTES LEGAL LOT --------- 285 UNIT ---------- 2 ISLES OF CAPRI SUBDIVISION 159 TAHITI STREET COLLIER COUNTY, FL. 0 w J LL1 In w oa Qo Lu U Z Z go In o U ww � J w w 0 In Z za oz 00 H z zLu �w a� ~w zm w 2 �U) 02 0 w co K H wZ o cD wco aw o H U oQ z Z J ' co ro __- " w tr) z m u O W 00 m 00 I m ON W T T� IIIIIIII,,,,,,, i, w rrririrrirrrrrr, �/j/ ''�, —Z - 1��'��/: �a 00 y 0 o_ 1 J = pz O lt') v~i4C :-Q LL" U J O b LL 111111W��``\\\ DATE: 06-09-2023 SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" DRAWN: DC / DW JOB: 2023- r m LL Y V O 0 O c �a T) •L I— L m I- 0 m 00 N 0 0 0 M N O N d M M O O) Associates, Inc. SHEET: S I OF 7 S11EETS 3.B.g #3 BARS @ 12" O.C. EACH WAY #5 BAR CONT.--\ # 5 BARS @ 4'-0" O.C. AND @ CORNERS — FILL CELLS (TYP.) SECTION - ELEV. 9.00' NAVD sx VAPOR BARRIER PILE SUPPORTED FILL 8" CON. BLOCK ELEV. 5.92' NAVD #3 TIES @ 36" O.0 6 - #5 BARS CONT. 10" X 10" R.C. PILING A -A #3 BARS @ 12" O.C. EACH WAY OPT. DECO DRAIN #5 BAR CONT>\ ELEV. 6.67' NAVD PILE SUPPORTED FILL"IL"'ll"'JII' III -III-III-III-II ° rIII-III-III -ill_,IIIIIIIII # 5 BARS @ T-0" O.C. AND @ CORNERS FILL CELLS (TYP.) d - a ° U d° ,1 All SECTION ELEV. VARIES (SEE PLANS) a° ,a X X X >n I-ITI-ITI-III- ° -ITI-ITI-I -1 l=1 1=1 l=III ° I -I I -I -I i 111-111=1 I' ° 11 11-III-III-I I a l-1 11=1 I III -III -I �' VAPOR BARRIER U I I —III —I II c� r------- i PILE SUPPORTED FILL #3 TIES @ 36" O.0 „ ELEV. 6.67' NAVD x ° �llLLr=-I VAPOR BARRIER PILE SUPPORTED FILL —12" CON. BLOCK ELEV. 5.92' NAVD #3 TIES @ 36" O.0 6 - #5 BARS CONT. 10" X 10" R.C. PILING E-E #3 BARS @ 12" O.C. EACH WAY l ll 4- #5 BARS CONTI. T PILIN 10" X 10" R.C. PILING SECTION J_j WAY BIER RTED FILL TYPICAL POOL WALL SECTION #3 BARS @ 12" O.C. EACH W. #5 BAR CONT. # 5 BARS @ T-0" O.C. AND @ CORNERS FILL CELLS (TYP.) WANE% SECTION ° MAX. 1/4" GAP TO BE CAULKED a ELEV. 6.00' NAVD a x a x x III=III-� VAPOR BARRIER ail 111 '�III�III #3 BARS AT 12" O. C. EA. WAY =TT1 -I PILE SUPPORTED FILL a v a m a SECTION ELEV. 6.67NAVD `III=1' III �I i' VAPOR ITI I BARRIER PILE SUPPORTED FILL 8" CON. BLOCK ELEV. 5.92' NAVD #3 TIES @ 36" O.0 6 - #5 BARS CONT. 10" X 10" R.C. PILING B-B ELEV. 7.00' NAVD SLOPED TO 6.83' NAVD �x-a4x II I -III -III VAPOR BARRIER �IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII-, 1=1 11=1 11=1 I i- I E1=1- 1=1=1= PILE SUPPORTED FILL =1=1= 1=1- =11�#3 BARS AT 12" O. C. EA. WAY _ #5 BARS AT 4 -0 O. C. AND AT CORNERS; FILL CELLS (TYP.) 8" CONCRETE BLOCK 12" CONCRETE BLOCK (IF NEEDED) ELEV. 4.58' NAVD #3 TIES AT 36" O. C. 6 - #5 BARS CONT. 10" X 10" R. C. PILING F-F APPLY 518" THICK TYPE "X" GYPSUM BOARD TO BOTH FACES OF STUDS AND CEILING OF GARAGE FASTEN WALLBOARD WITH TYPE 'IS" SCREWS OR 6d CEMENT -COATED NAILS (1 7/8" LONG) TO ALL STUDS AND 10 PLATES AT MAX. 7" SPACING COVER JOINTS WITH PAPER TAPE; APPLY JOINT COMPOUND OVER TAPE, NAILHEADS, AND SCREWS 2 X 4 STUDS AT 16" O. C. MAX. SIMPSON MSTA24 STRAPS FROM STUDS TO SILL PLATE AT 32" O. C. MAX. 2 X 4 P. T. SILL PLATE SEAL JOINT BETWEEN WALLBOARD /16 AND SLAB WITH FIRE -RATED CAULK ("FIRE BARRIER" CP25WB+ MADE BY 3M); MAX. 1/4" GAP TO BE CAULKED ELEV. 7.00' NAVD SLOPED TO 6.83' NAVD a ° ° x a x x VAPOR BARRIER 11 lll=Lll -LLI=LI l= #3 BARS BARS AT 12" O. C. EA. WAY =1I I -I I '-1111111 =1 PILE SUPPORTED FILL a I NOTE: THIS ASSEMBLY IS a DESIGNED AND RATED v FOR USE AS A BEARING m a WALL; USE FOR NON -LOAD BEARING APPLICATIONS IS ALSO PERMISSIBLE SEAL WALLBOARD JOINT AT CEILING (MAX. 1/4" GAP ALLOWED) WITH "FIRE BARRIER" CAULK INSULATE ALL WALLS BETWEEN CONDITIONED SPACES AND THOSE UNCONDITIONED WITH 3 1/2" FIBERGLASS BATTING BETWEEN STUDS (MIN. R-11) MIN. 1/2" DIAM. ANCHOR BOLTS AT 32" MAX. SPACING; MINIMUM EMBEDMENT INTO SLAB 7" #5 BAR CONT. ELEV. 9.00' NAVD ° X X _Lr—VAPOR BARRIER li PILE SUPPORTED FILL —#3 BARS AT 12" O. C. EA. WAY #5 BARS AT T-0" O. C. AND AT CORNERS; FILL CELLS (TYP.) 8" CONCRETE BLOCK 12" CONCRETE BLOCK (IF NEEDED) ELEV. 5.92' NAVD - #3 TIES AT 36" O. C. - 6 - #5 BARS CONT. - 10" X 10" R. C. PILING SECTION C-C NOTE: THE PARTITION CONSTRUCTION ABOVE THE SLAB MEETS THE STANDARDS FOR A ONE -HOUR RATED WALL ASSEMBLY AS PER UL DESIGN U359 (INDICATED BY THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 7th EDITION, FOR SEPARATION OF PARKING GARAGES FROM LIVING SPACES WITHIN SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL OCCUPANCIES) #3 BARS @ ' '" r` r v A (u w7 A v ELEV. 7.00' TO 6.83NA �n PILE SUPI " CLR. 3CLR. ELEV. VARIES OPT. DECO -DRAIN #3 BARS @ 12" O.C. EACH WAY ° ° ° ° (SEE PLANS) 1 (SECTION K'-K' ° d 0 d° d I dg ° d X i()1 °r- -- 5#513 S]-� a a �- - i -III ° -III-III- d° =111=11-III-III-III-11=1 11=1 i �I-III-III=III- III -III -III -II' VAPOR BARRIER PILE CUTOFF TO BE _4l 11 l 11 11 l lI I ° III±I II II II �' DETERMINED BY CONTR m ° a PILE SUPPORTED FILL #3 BARS TIES @ 36" O.0 4- #5 BARS CONT. SEC SECTION K-K #5 BARS @ 4'-O" O.C. AND @ CORNERS, ALSO 1 EA. SIDE OF OPENINGS AND 2 EA. SIDE OF OPENINGS OVER 8'-0" WIDE Z FILL CELLS AT ALL VERT. BARD (TYP.) �o w a ELEV. 9.00' NAVD a a x ° IC I I=I I I 1- ' d'— _1=1' - SEE OTHER SECTIONS TYP. WALL SECTION SIMPSON ETA22 OR EQUAL #5 BARS @ 4'-0" O.C. MAX. & @ CORNERS, ALSO ONE EACH SIDE OF OPENINGS 8'-0" WIDE OR LESS & TWO EACH SIDE OF OPENINGS THAT EXCEED 8'-0" WIDE SECTION 5 BARS @ T-0" O.C. AND @ )RNERS FILL CELLS (TYP.) "CON. BLOCK 2" CON. BLOCK (IF NEEDED) LEV. 5.92' NAVD #3 TIES @ 36" O.0 i - #5 BARS CONT. 0" X 10" R.C. PILING G-G - " ,x 4'-0" " CLR. 3' CLR. ° d ° ° ° ° ° A 7 #5 BARS d '4 --- 1, 1'-4''X 5 #5 BARS PILE CUTOFF TO BE ' " DETERMINED BY CONTR. 10" X 10" R.C. PILE WAY SECTION M-M 10" X 10" R.C. PILE STRUCTURAL NOTES: TION L-L 1 CONCRETE SHALL BE 3000 PSI AT 28 DAYS TYPICAL H U RRI CAN 2. REINFORCING STEEL SHALL BE GRADE 60. GRADE 40 MAY BE USED IN POOL SHELL ONLY 3. THERE WILL BE 69 PILES REQUIRED (10" X 10" REINFORCED CONCRETE). 4. SAFE BEARING LOAD FOR PILES IS 15 TONS. USE 15 TONS BEARING POOL AND SPA 5. RECESS AND CURBS FOR DOORS ARE NOT SHOWN. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL FLOOR PLAN FOR SIZE AND LOCATION 6. THIS STRUCTURE IS TO BE LOCATED IN THE COASTAL FLOOD HAZARD ZONE. ALL ELECTRICAL 8" X 16" CONT. TIE BEAM W/2 #5 AND MECHANICAL DEVICES SHALL BE LOCATED AT BARS TOP @ BOTT. THICKEN AS OR ABOVE THE FLOOD PLAIN ELEVATION REQUIRED OVER OPENINGS 7. COORDINATION OF CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING VERIFICATION OF DIMENSIONS AND FIELD NOTE: ITY OF HURRICANE STRAPPING FOR ALL CONTRACOTOI� ZANY DISCREPANCIES HALL BE GIRDER TRUSSES, ROOF BEAMS & BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE DESIGN LANAI SUPPORT CONNECTIONS PROFESSIONAL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. TO BE SUBMITTED BY BUILDER &g OWNER AND/OR CONTRACTOR TO DETERMINE DEPTH APPROVED BY ENGINEER OF POOL AND/OR SPA. THE ENGINEER SHALL NOT BE BEFORE CONSTRUCTION RESPONSIBLE FOR POOL OR SPA DEPTH 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AND FIELD LOCATE VENTILATION FOR RELIEF OF F HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE. E STRAPPING GARAGE SLAB. MINIMUM OF BOTTOM N. OF VEQNT ATOAF MAXIMUM OF 12 ABOVE FINISHED GRADE #3 BARS @ 12" O.C. EACH WAY OPT. DECO DRAIN ELEV. 9.00' NAVD 5 BAR CONTINUOUS ELEV. 8.67NAVD 4 5c 4 ° d x PILE SUPPORTED FILL ' I I -I I I -I I I -I I I �-III-III-III-I' '� I -I 11=1 I I -III-I 11=1 11=1 i' '-III-III ° III-III-III=1 I - 11 l �' VAPOR BARRIER 12" CON. BLOCK A,I Ill= I' III- PILE SUPPORTED FILL # 5 BARS @ 4'-0" O.C. AND @ CORNERS FILL CELLS (TYP.) ELEV. 5.92' NAVD d 7" 7" 7" I Hy - a v_ m 10" X 10" R.C. PILING I Hy v ° ° #3 TIES @ 36" O.0 m 6 - #5 BARS CONT. 10" X 10" R.C. PILING SECTION D-D #3 BARS @ 12" O.C. EACH WAY #5 BARS CONT. ELEV. 8.67NAVD 111 --�� 1011 loll (TYg•11 \—PILE SUPPORTED FILL # 5 BARS @ T-0" O.C. AND @ CORNERS FILL CELLS (TYP.) —ELEV. 5.92' NAVD d ° a , d° ° #3 TIES @ 36" O.0 6 - #5 BARS CONT. #4 BARS @ P-3" O.C. #5 BARS @ 8" O.C. SECTION H-H LEGAL LOT --------- 285 UNIT ---------- 2 ISLES OF CAPRI SUBDIVISION 159 TAHITI STREET COLLIER COUNTY, FL. 10. THESE PLANS HAVE BEEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION R301 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE - RESIDENTIAL (FBC, 7th EDITION); USING THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA: A) "MINIMUM DESIGN LOADS FOR BUILDINGS AND OTHER STRUCTURES" (ASCE 7-16 USING "C C" METHOD) B) BASIC WIND SPEED: 160 M.P.H. (PER MAPS PREPARED BY COLLIER COUNTY BASED ON FIGURE 1606A) C) WIND EXPOSURE: EXPOSURE "C" D) INTERNAL PRESSURE COEFFICIENT: +/- 0.18 / ENCLOSED E) BUILDING RISK CATEGORY: II j F K & cia w w J LL U O o ¢O v Lu Y W U H z zz = oFnw } w U Q m w� J o w Lu J In Z W z ¢ LL o °o W a o zw w z Z. W O z - J w m Q F U MR m 0 oof �ww WQa � o� LD x ww U w O H 0 w x w¢ w z ~ W a a . FF j'Co o _Z N N Y u' Lo "U o �Z y. les, Inc. to c� c� N �u � m W u Q LJ1 0 0 � N > d CST C t- Lo � o � m ti o v o W � o o M N CD op J a M 0 L I m v� la CL m o r I00 110 to Cm�T 11111111�,,,,,, ............... 3, _ z� O OJ pz co J_ o N * x ¢ O Z z- Y w *k N� ?��O�., "o z of _U J O ( nnu„„n"°�O�wly PR �' LL 111111111111`I`\``` DATE: 06-09-2023 SCALE: NTS DRAWN: DC / DW JOB: 2023- SHEET: S2 OF 7 SHEETS Packet Pg. 142 3.B.g 1y : STRUCTURAL HEADER PER CALLOUT; CONNECT TO STUDS WITH SIMPSON ST22 STRAP; CONNECT STUDS TO SLAB THRU BASE PLATE W/ SIMPSON HD-5A CO .,.. ___ CONNECT TO KING STUDS TO TOP PLA WITH SIMPSON MTS 12 TIE CUD HEADER FRAMING DETAIL O o �. 0 FRAMING NOTE: INT. LOAD BEARING WALL CONCRETE TILE ON PEEL & STICK MEMBRAN OVER 1/2" CDX PLYWOOD SHEATHING - 4-PLY SIMPSON MTS 16 STRAP @ EACH TRUSS (TYPICAL); ALSO REFER TO TRUSS PLAN I� 6 ELEV. VARIES / ALUMN. FASCIA PRE-ENGINEERED TRUSSES (EI2C) ON 2X6 SUB -FASCIA DOUBLE 2 x 4 TOP PLATE 7T4 1/2" STUCCO FINISH OVER MET 2 x 4 STUDS @ 16" O.C. OVER 30# FELT ON 1/2" CDX PLYW v 2 x 4 BOTTOM PLATE SIMPSON MSTA 36 STRAP @ 32" O.C. MAX. OVER PLATE TO SIDES OF STUDS 1/2" CDX PLYWOOD SHEATHING - 4-PLY SIMPSON MTS 16 STRAP @ EA. STUD 2 x 4 BETWEEN TRUSSES T 16" O.C. FOR LENGTH OF WALL SIMPSON HUS12 AT EA. SIDE PRE-ENGINEERED TRUSSES 8"X 16" CONCRETE BLOCK COLUMN W/ 245 BARS FRAMING ABOVE ROOF DETAIL CONT. FROM SLAB TO TIEBEAM AND FILLED CELLS; PROVIDE MINIMUM 30 BAR DIAMETER OVERLAP AT ANY SPLICED STEEL LOCATION 8"x 16"X 16" CONCRETE BLOCK COLUMN W/ 545 BARS CONT. FROM SLAB TO TIEBEAM AND FILLED CELLS; PROVIDE MINIMUM 30 BAR T . — DIAMETER OVERLAP AT ANY SPLICED STEEL LOCATION INTERIOR LOAD -BEARING WALLS TO BE CONSTRUCTED OF MIN. 2 X 4 STUDS AT 16" MAX. SPACING, NO.3 STANDARD GRADE (OR BETTER). PROVIDE DOUBLE TOP PLATE AND SINGLE PRESSURE -TREATED SILL PLATE SAME SIZE AS STUDS. ANCHOR SILL PLATE TO SLAB WITH MIN. 1/2" DIAM. BOLTS AT 32" MAX. SPACING, MIN. 7" EMBEDMENT INTO CONCRETE. INSTALL SIMPSON MSTA24 STRAPS AT TOP AND BOTTOM ENDS OF STUDS; WRAP OVER TOP PLATES AND BENEATH SILL PLATES AND FASTEN TO OPPOSITE EDGE OF STUDS USING (18)-lod NAILS PER STRAP AT HOLES PROVIDED BY MANUFACTURER. REFER TO SECTION 2306 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE FOR REQUIRED FRAMING FASTENERS AND TO SECTION 2308.7 FOR LIMITATIONS ON CUTTING, NOTCHING AND BORING OF HOLES THROUGH LOAD -BEARING FRAMING MEMBERS. O FILLED CELL �wi■v�.a� 1 16" (4)-#5 BARS #3 TIES @ 18" O.C. COLUMN C-1 TOP REINF. #3 STIRRUPS - (B - 3") X (H-3") 4 BOTTOM REINF. 1 1/2" CLEAR CONTRACTOR TO DETERMINE NUMBER OF BLOCK REQUIRED FOR PROPER COURSING. CUT BLOCK AS NECESSARY #5 VERT. REBAR AT 4'-0" O.C. 3T CONC. LINTEL REBAR CONTINUOUS BEAM SECTION NOTE: THIS DETAIL IS TYPICAL AT LOCATIONS WHERE THE DISTANCE FROM TOP OF OPENING TO TOP OF THE BEAM EXCEEDS THE DEPTH OF THE TIE BEAM AS NOTED IN THE BEAM SCHEDULE. THE TIE BEAMS SHOWN IN THE BEAM SCHEDULE ARE MINIMUM SIZES THAT MUST BE USED OVER THAT INDIVIDUAL OPENING. THEY MAY NOT NECESSARILY BE FULL HEIGHT IN WHICH CASE A LINTEL AND FILLER BLOCK, AS SHOWN ABOVE, MUST BE USED. FIRST LEVEL WOOD BEAM SCHEDULE MARK CLEAR I SPAN 1LEFT_ONGTH BEAM DESCRIPTION REMARKS 2B-2 2(Y 2" 2P-6" 3-PLY 1 3/4" X 16" LVL11 3 ROWS 10'd's @ 12" O.C. STAGGERED BOTH SIDES NOTE: REFER TO LOCATIONS MARKED AS "BEAM BY G. C." ON TRUSS LAYOUT FOR LOCATION OF INTERIOR WOODEN AND STEEL BEAMS CONCRETE BEAM SCHEDULE BEAM _p_1 MIDDLE BM BEAM DESCRIPTION EIO F. REINF. REINFFSPAN EACH END ® O.H. GARAGE DOOR 2 #5 BARS N/A 2 #5 BARS 12'-0" 8" 16" N/A N/A ® O.H. GARAGE DOOR 2 #5 BARS N/A 2 #5 BARS 12'-0" 8" 16" N/A N/A OENTRY SPANS 2 #5 BARS N/A 2 #5 BARS 10'-4" 8" 16" N/A N/A O ENTRY DOOR SPAN 2 #5 BARS N/A 2 #5 BARS 6'-0" 8" 16" N/A N/A O SGD SPAN 2 #6 BARS N/A 2 #8 BARS 20'-0" 8" 1 22" 7" CONT O SGD SPAN 2 #5 BARS N/A 2 #5 BARS 8'-0" 8" 16" N/A N/A OMECH PAD SPAN 2 #6 BARS N/A 2 #8 BARS 1T-4" 8" 20" 7" 11 OTYPICAL SHORT SPAN 2 #5 BARS N/A 2 #5 BARS 3'-0" 8" 16" N/A N/A O LANAI SPAN 2 #5 BARS N/A 2 #5 BARS 12'-5" 8" 16" N/A N/A O LANAI SPAN 2 #5 BARS N/A 2 #5 BARS 12'-5" 8" 16" N/A N/A OLANAI SPAN 2 #5 BARS N/A 2 #5 BARS 34' 8" 16" N/A N/A ® LANAI SPAN 2 #5 BARS N/A 2 #5 BARS 11'-4" 8" 16" N/A N/A NOTE: BEAMS SHOWN ALLOW FOR 2x4 P.T. BUCKING TO BE INSTALLED AT WINDOW AND DOOR HEADERS; BEAMS MAY BE MADE 6" DEEPER THAN SHOWN WITHOUT CHANGE NEEDED TO THE REINFORCEMENT SIZE SPACING OR QUANTITIES INDICATED. 1/2 S S S S S S S S S S S S 1/2 #5 REBAR S S EACH CELLt� I v C C v v n ° 4 ° 4 #5 REBAR ° 4 a 4 TOP REINFORCEMENT 4 ° ° ° 4 ° -a ° d vd 4 ° 4 4 4 4 v ° v BOTTOM REINFORCEMENT ° ° 4 4 ° 4 4 n 4 v v 4// � //// v v Av SPAN //z BEAM PROFILE 8" C.M.U. TOP REIN #3 STIRRUPS (B - 3") X (H BOTTOM REIP BEAM SECTION NOTES: 1. BEAMS DESIGNED PER ACI 318-14 & ACI 332-14 UTILIZING STRENGTH FACTORS 2. COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF CONCRETE SHALL BE A MIN. OF 3,000 PSI AT 28 DAYS. 3. REINFORCING STEEL SHALL BE GRADE 60. 4. DESIGN WIND SPEED IS 170 M .P. H. PER SECTION R613.6 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE -RESIDENTIAL, 7th EDITION (WIND VELOCITY AS PER MAPS PREPARED BY COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA. 5. PROVIDE STANDARD 3/8" HANGERS AT 12" O.C. (WHERE STIRRUPS ARE NOT SPECIFIED). 8" C.M.U. W a oW Qo U W U_ h Z Z00 < 0 � G U J c W p Fo W z a C Z u O U c o c zLL[] Qw >- Lu W 02 ' 0 W L U), p FF � a` 00 w V o a Ws o� 00 p w¢ u z u a J � K � Associates, In c. Co I m I 1111111111///�/, w = Z = 0 U- z !`�, lL 6- ✓ '� LL W v Z J 00 o of _ pz J_ O N _Q - - ¢ O?Z = Yui = !n !o Z I J 06 PRLi c U. IIIII11111\\\\\\\\\\ DATE: 06-09-2023 SCALE: 3/16" =1'-0" DRAWN: DC / DW JOB: 2023- SHEET: S3 OF 7 SHUTS Packet Pg. 143 3.B.g O PROVIDE MIN. (3) 2 X 4 STUDS IN WALL AT BEARING LOCATIONS; CONNECT HEADER TO STUDS WITH SIMPSON ST22 STRAP; CONNECT STUDS TO SLAB THRU BASE PLATE W/ SIMPSON HD-513 CONNECTOR /11 WdWWWA VA WA F1910 M 79 WA WA WA WA WA WA �rssr.�sr��r�a�►rrr� 0 FRAMING NOTE: INT. LOAD BEARING WALL INTERIOR LOAD -BEARING WALLS TO BE CONSTRUCTED OF MIN. 2 X 4 STUDS AT 16" MAX. SPACING, NO. 3 STANDARD GRADE (OR BETTER). PROVIDE DOUBLE TOP PLATE AND SINGLE PRESSURE -TREATED SILL PLATE SAME SIZE AS STUDS. ANCHOR SILL PLATE TO SLAB WITH MIN. 1/2" DIAM. BOLTS AT 32" MAX. SPACING, MIN. 7" EMBEDMENT INTO CONCRETE. INSTALL SIMPSON MSTA24 STRAPS AT TOP AND BOTTOM ENDS OF STUDS; WRAP OVER TOP PLATES AND BENEATH SILL PLATES AND FASTEN TO OPPOSITE EDGE OF STUDS USING (18)-lod NAILS PER STRAP AT HOLES PROVIDED BY MANUFACTURER. REFER TO SECTION 2306 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE FOR REQUIRED FRAMING FASTENERS AND TO SECTION 2308.7 FOR LIMITATIONS ON CUTTING, NOTCHING AND BORING OF HOLES THROUGH LOAD -BEARING FRAMING MEMBERS. PROVIDE MIN. (2) 2 X 4 STUDS IN WALL AT BEARING LOCATIONS; CONNECT HEADER TO STUDS WITH SIMPSON ST22 STRAP; CONNECT STUDS TO SLAB THRU BASE PLATE W/ SIMPSON D-5B CTOR WB-1 WB-2 WB-1 — �-3�ll-5ts �vlvlr� PROVIDE MIN. (5) 2 X 4 STUDS IN WALL AT BEARING LOCATIONS; CONNECT HEADER TO STUDS WITH SIMPSON ST22 STRAP; CONNECT STUDS TO SLAB THRU BASE PLATE W/ SIMPSON O HD-513 CONNECTOR _O_ Q I' I O •.t r.l � 8"X 16" CONCRETE BLOCK COLUMN W/ 245 BARS CONT. FROM SLAB TO TIEBEAM AND FILLED CELLS; PROVIDE MINIMUM 30 BAR DIAMETER OVERLAP AT ANY SPLICED STEEL LOCATION 8"X 16"X 16" CONCRETE BLOCK COLUMN W/ 545 BARS CONT. FROM SLAB TO TIEBEAM AND FILLED CELLS; PROVIDE MINIMUM 30 BAR — -- „ DIAMETER OVERLAP AT ANY SPLICED STEEL 0• '— LOCATION ® ® I•: I G IMPSON HGU 10-4 SIMPSON HUS26 PROVIDE MIN. (5) 2 X 4 STUDS IN WALL AT BEARING LOCATIONS; CONNECT HEADER TO STU WITH SIMPSON ST22 STRAP; CONNECT STUDS TO SLAB THRU BASE PLATE W/ SIMPSON PROVIDE MINX 4 STUDS IN WALL AT BEARING LOCATIONS; CONNECT HEADER TO STUDS WITH SIMPSON ST22 STRAP; CONNECT STUDS TO SLAB THRU BASE PLATE W/ SIMPSON HD-513 CONNECTOR WB-6 I. Q O O hi OI.� RO• PROVIDE MIN. (2) 2 X 4 STUDS IN WALL AT BEARING LOCATIONS; CONNECT HEADER TO STUDS WITH SIMPSON ST22 STRAP; CONNECT STUDS TO SLAB THRU BASE PLATE W/ SIMPSON HD-5B CONNECTOR I I TOP REINF. #3 STIRRUPS - (B - 3") X (H - 3") a a BOTTOM] 1 1/2" CLEAR TTT 1lT A l rT f !mil nn f Tl l UN -SUPPORTED TIE BEAM INTERSECTION DETAIL FIRST LEVEL WOOD BEAM SCHEDULE MARK FCLEAR SPAN TOOTAL ENGTH BEAM DESCRIPTION REMARKS WB-1 3 4' T-0" 3-PLY 2 X 12 LUMBER WB-2 3-0" 3-8" 3-PLY 2 X 12 LUMBER WB-3 2'-8" 3 4' 3-PLY 2 X 12 LUMBER WB-4 2f-411 3f-0" 3-PLY 2 X 12 LUMBER WB-5 5 -0 6-8" 4-PLY 1 3/4 X 16 LVL 3 ROWS 10 d s @ 12 O.C. STAGGERED BOTH SIDES WB-6 13-6" 4-PLY 13/4" X 16" LVL 3 ROWS 10'd's @ 12" O.C. STAGGERED BOTH SIDES WB-7 13'-0" M 4-PLY 13/4" X 16" LVL 3 ROWS 10'd's @ 12" O.C. STAGGERED BOTH SIDES WB-8 13'-0" 4-PLY 1 3/4" X 16" LVL 3 ROWS 10'd's @ 12" O.C. STAGGERED BOTH SIDES NOTE: REFER TO LOCATIONS MARKED AS "BEAM BY G. C." ON TRUSS LAYOUT FOR LOCATION OF INTERIOR WOODEN AND STEEL BEAMS CONTRACTOR TO DETERMINE NUMBER OF BLOCK REQUIRED FOR PROPER COURSING. CUT BLOCK AS NECESSARY #5 VERT. REBAR AT 4'-0" O.C. 3T CONC. LINTEL REBAR CONTINUOUS BEAM SECTION NOTE: THIS DETAIL IS TYPICAL AT LOCATIONS WHERE THE DISTANCE FROM TOP OF OPENING TO TOP OF THE BEAM EXCEEDS THE DEPTH OF THE TIE BEAM AS NOTED IN THE BEAM SCHEDULE. THE TIE BEAMS SHOWN IN THE BEAM SCHEDULE ARE MINIMUM SIZES THAT MUST BE USED OVER THAT INDIVIDUAL OPENING. THEY MAY NOT NECESSARILY BE FULL HEIGHT IN WHICH CASE A LINTEL AND FILLER BLOCK, AS SHOWN ABOVE, MUST BE USED. #5 REBAR _ EACH CELL ° #5 REBAR I C 8" C.M.U. TOP REIN #3 STIRRUPS (B - 3") X (H BOTTOM REIP 1/2 S 01A CONCRETE BEAM SCHEDULE BEAM BEAM DESCRIPTION F—TINF. MIDDLESTIRR. BREINPM === EF cps EAOCH END ® TERRACE SPANS 2 #5 BARS N/A 2 #6 BARS 164" 8" 16" 7 10 ® TERRACE SPANS 2 #5 BARS N/A 2 #6 BARS 164" 8" 16" 7" 10 OENTRY SPANS 2 #5 BARS N/A 2 #5 BARS 10'-4" 8" 16" N/A N/A O STAIR WINDOW 2 #5 BARS N/A 2 #5 BARS 6-0" 8" 16" N/A N/A O FRONT TERRACE DOORS 2 #5 BARS N/A 2 #5 BARS 64' 8" 16" N/A N/A O BEDROOM SGD SPAN 2 #5 BARS N/A 2 #5 BARS 8'-0" 8" 16" N/A N/A OGREAT ROOM SGD SPAN 2 #6 BARS N/A 2 #8 BARS 20'-0" 8" 22" 7" CONT O DINING SGD SPAN 2 #5 BARS N/A 2 #5 BARS 8'-0" 8" 16" N/A N/A O DINING WINDOW SPAN 2 #5 BARS N/A 2 #5 BARS 8'-0" 8" 16" N/A N/A K KITCHEN WINDOW SPAN 2 #5 BARS N/A 2 #5 BARS 64" 8" 16" N/A N/A (D LANAI SPAN 2 #5 BARS N/A 2 #5 BARS 12'-5" 8" 16" N/A N/A ® LANAI SPAN 2 #5 BARS N/A 2 #5 BARS 12'-5" 8" 16" N/A N/A © LANAI SPAN 2 #5 BARS N/A 2 #5 BARS 34" 8" 16" N/A N/A LANAI SPAN 2 #5 BARS N/A 2 #5 BARS 11'-4" 8" 16" N/A N/A ® LANAI SPAN 2 #5 BARS N/A 2 #5 BARS 4'-8" 8" 16" N/A N/A © TYPICAL SHORT SPAN 2 #5 BARS N/A 2 #5 BARS 3'-1" 8" 16" N/A N/A O WETDECK SPAN 2 #5 BARS N/A N/A NOTE: BEAMS SHOWN ALLOW FOR 2A P.T. BUCKING TO BE INSTALLED AT WINDOW AND DOOR HEADERS; BEAMS MAY BE MADE 6" DEEPER THAN SHOWN WITHOUT CHANGE NEEDED TO THE REINFORCEMENT SIZE SPACING OR QUANTITIES INDICATED. S S S S S S S S S S S I S Alle C C ° ° d n ° d C a TOP° REINFORCEMENT d °d d °a d BOTTOM REINFORCEMENT ° a a a ° ° a BEAM SECTION SPAN BEAM PROFILE NOTES: 1. BEAMS DESIGNED PER ACI 318-14 & ACI 332-14 UTILIZING STRENGTH FACTORS 2. COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF CONCRETE SHALL BE A MIN. OF 3,000 PSI AT 28 DAYS. 3. REINFORCING STEEL SHALL BE GRADE 60. 4. DESIGN WIND SPEED IS 170 M .P. H. PER SECTION R613.6 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE -RESIDENTIAL, 7th EDITION (WIND VELOCITY AS PER MAPS PREPARED BY COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA. 5. PROVIDE STANDARD 3/8" HANGERS AT 12" O.C. (WHERE STIRRUPS ARE NOT SPECIFIED). 1/2 S ° 8" C.M.U. 0 w lu a ow � Q O U W 2h Z Z < o of F o U o I c W uu a Foz c z 0oa c o c Lu0 Qw w ` w m �U u � U) o o� ° p W u D W a FD a` 00 w V o W C a o� C 00 p W Q z � a J � K � Associates, Irlc. O w _ Z li z !`�, u 6- �% ✓ '� u w 'IT CO J __ p z w JOU y lol r W-Q Lo T < o=Z _ YW 4t !!1 Cj Z o J c PR Luw Ll IIIII11111\\\\\\\\\\ DATE: 06-09-2023 SCALE: 3/16" =1'-0" DRAWN: DC / DW JOB: 2023- SHEET: S4 OF 7 SHUTS Packet Pg. 144 3.B.g 2x6 STUDS TO CREATE PROVIDE A MIN. OF (3) ! A ll! C 'Oh Tr. i FROM STUD TO BEAM 1D5A FROM BASE OF BELOW SECOND LEVEL WOOD BEAM SCHEDULE MARK SPAN LEONGTH BEAM DESCRIPTION REMARKS WB-1 2'-4" 3-0" 3-PLY 2 X 12 LUMBER WB-2 2'-4" 3-0" 4-PLY 2 X 12 LUMBER WB-3 6'4" 6-8" 4-PLY 2 X 12 LUMBER WB-4 12'-0" 12'-8" 3-PLY 2 X 12 LUMBER WB-5 15'-0" 15'-8" 3-PLY 2 X 12 LUMBER WB-6 5'-0" 5'-8" 4-PLY 2 X 12 LUMBER WB-7 12'-5" 13-1" 3-PLY 1 3/4" X 12" LVL WB-8 3-4" 4'4" 3-PLY 1 3/4" X 12" LVL WB-9 5'-8" 3-PLY 1 3/4" X 12" LVL WB-10 4'-8" 5'-4" 3-PLY 1 3/4" X 12" LVL NOTE: REFER TO LOCATIONS MARKED AS "BEAM BY G. C." ON TRUSS LAYOUT FOR LOCATION OF INTERIOR WOODEN AND STEEL BEAMS CONCRETE TILE ON PEEL & STICK MEM OVER 518" CDX PLYWOOD SHEATHING - SIMPSON MTS 16 STRAP @ EACH TRUSS _ (TYPICAL); ALSO REFER TO TRUSS PLAN GALVANIZED DRIP STRIP 41.33' N.A.V.D. Ix 4 FASCIA OVER Ix 8 FASCIA ON 2X6 SUB -FASCIA 5/8" STUCCO FINISH OVER METAL LATHJ SIMPSON MSTA 36 STRAP @ 32" O.C. MAX. - OVER PLATE TO SIDES OF STUDS 518" STUCCO FINISH OVER METAL LATH OVER 30# BUILDING PAPER TYVEK BUILDING PAPER OVER 1/2" 4-PLY CDX PLYWOOD SHEATHING FASTENED TO STUDS @ 6" O.0 ON THE PERIMETER AND 6" O.0 INTHE FIELD 31.67' N.A.V.D. HOLD BACK FLOOR TRUSSES MIN. 3/4'1-- FROM OUTER EDGE OF TIE -BEAM FOR SHEATHING & METAL LATH. 30.17' N.A.V.D. SIMPSON MSTA 36 STRAP @ 32" O.C. (STUDS TO TRUSS) SIMPSON META 22 STRAP AT EACH FLOOR TRUSS MIN. 8" x 16" CONCRETE TIE BEAM W/(4) #5 BARS CONT.; REFER TO BEAM SCHEDULE FOR - SPANS NEEDING ADDITIONAL REINF. #5 BARS @ T-0" O.C. MAX FILL CELLS W/ CONCRETE PRE-ENGINEERED TRUSSES AT 24" O.C. MAX. W/BRACING 5/8" GYPSUM BOARD R-19 SPRAY FOAM INSULATION 1X3 STRIPPING AT 16" O.C.; SHIM TO LEVEL CEILING DOUBLE 2 x 4 TOP PLATE 2 x 6 STUDS @ 16" O.C. 1/2" GYPSUM BOARD Z R-19 BATT. INSULATION (5.5") W U 0 2 x 4 BOTTOM PLATE - SIMPSON H2.5 CLIP AT EACH STUD TO BASE PLATE BASEBOARD 3/4" PLYWOOD SHEATHING FINISHED FLOORING v1 U - U1 U-)�O 4z = 5/8" GYPSUM BOARD 1X3 STRIPPING AT 16" O.C.; SHIM TO LEVEL CEILING 1/2" GYPSUM BOARD 8" CONCRETE BLOCK 2ND STORY WALL SECTION N.T.S. CONCRETE TILE ON PEEL & STICK MEMBRAM OVER 5/8" CDX PLYWOOD SHEATHING - 4-PLY SIMPSON META 20 STRAP AT EACH TRUSS (TYPICAL); ALSO REFER TO TRUSS PLAN — STARTER TILE AND CLOSURE STRIP DRIP STRIP gj)ELEV. VARIES :j (SEE PLANS) Ix 4 FASCIA OVER Ix 8 FASCIA ON 2X6 SUB-FASC 5/8" STUCCO FINISH OVER 4' METAL LATH WITH MIN. 8" X 12" CONCRETE TIE BEAM WA4) #5 BARS CONT.• REFER TO BEAM SCHEDULE FOR SPANSI NEEDING ADDITIONAL REINF. PROVIDE HORIZONTAL REINFORCEMENT AT EVERY THIRD COURSE OF MASONRY WHERE WALLS EXCEED 10'-0" HEIGHT FROM TOP OF SLAB TO BOTTOM OF TIE BEAM 518" STUCCO FINISH #5 BAR VERT. AT EACH SIDE OF OPENINGS, (2 #5 BARS AT OPENINGS 8'-0" & OVER) AT CORNERS ENDS AND AT 4'-0" O. C. MAX.; FILL CELLS *ITH CONCRETE ELEV. +0'-0" (9.00' N.A.V.D.) FINISH GRADE PRE-ENGINEERED TRUSSES AT 24" O. C. MAX. W/BRACING 12 6I *v R-19 SPRAY FOAM INSULATION 1 X 3 STRIPPING AT 16" O. C.; SHIM TO LEVEL CEILING (OPTIONAL) 5/8" GYPSUM BOARD 8" CONCRETE BLOCK 1/2" GYPSUM BOARD 1" BATT INSULATION (R-7.2) BETWEEN FURRING STRIPS 1 X 2 P.T. FURRING AT 16" O. C. BASEBOARD FINISH FLOOR COVERING REINF. CONCRETE SLAB ----------------- ��'O�IOOO�I�NI MIL VAPOR BARRIER SEE FOUNDATION PLAN FOR SPECS SINGLE -STORY WALL SECTION 0 J Lu 0 w i �QO� ! W U_ f z ZLu i 0 U , ] W J ] W W I f J Z Q I l O I ,F I C 0Lu w I ] z IL � Q Lu > i~W' w Co i 0 ` oWl i In of i = D F ooz �wV� > a w 1 0 H 0 I �w¢i z R a M' W W ulnlllll,��, w Z LL z LL W 00 o � J _ pz J_ 0 N _Q _ - 04 ¢ O?Z = YU) !!1 6o Lu Z 0 J ob LU c PRLl IJi IIIII11111\\\\\\\\\\ DATE: 06-09-2023 CALF: 3/16" = 11-0" WN: DC / DW JOB: 2023- SHEET: S 5 IL Y V O G O C N R F_ N L L f0 F_ 01 r p m ti 00 r N O O O M N O 04 J a M M O O� j F K & Associates1, , In c. OF 7 SHUTS Packet Pg. 145 Components & Cladding for Roof & Wall Openings, ASCE 7-16 General Information Roof Information 3.111 TYPICAL WINDLOAD CONNECTORS & FASTENING SCHEDULE MANUFACTURER PRODUCT UPLIFT MANUFACTURER PRODUCT CODE UPLIFT DESCRIPTION FASTENERS USP CONNECTORS HTA20 2,005 SIMPSON CONNECTORS HETA20 1,890 TRUSS ANCHOR, HIGH UPLIFT CONCRETE FOLLOW TRUSS CONNECTOR INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS USP CONNECTORS HTT-16 4,290 SIMPSON CONNECTORS HTT-16 4,175 TENSION TIE CONCRETE FOLLOW TRUSS CONNECTOR INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS USP CONNECTORS HTT-16 4,290 SIMPSON CONNECTORS HTT-16 4,175 TENSION TIE WOOD FOLLOW TRUSS CONNECTOR INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS USP CONNECTORS HTT-22 5,370 SIMPSON CONNECTORS HTT-22 5,260 TENSION TIE CONCRETE FOLLOW TRUSS CONNECTOR INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS USP CONNECTORS HTT-22 5,370 SIMPSON CONNECTORS HTT-22 51260 TENSION TIE WOOD FOLLOW TRUSS CONNECTOR INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS USP CONNECTORS HUGT2 9,505 SIMPSON CONNECTORS HGT2 10,980 TRUSS ANCHOR, HIGH UPLIFT CONCRETE/WOOD FOLLOW TRUSS CONNECTOR INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS USP CONNECTORS HUGT3 9,770 SIMPSON CONNECTORS HGT3 10,530 TRUSS ANCHOR, HIGH UPLIFT CONCRETE/WOOD FOLLOW TRUSS CONNECTOR INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS USP CONNECTORS HUGT4 9,770 SIMPSON CONNECTORS HUGT4 9,250 TRUSS ANCHOR, HIGH UPLIFT CONCRETE/WOOD FOLLOW TRUSS CONNECTOR INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS USP CONNECTORS CBS44 5,525 SIMPSON CONNECTORS CBS44 5,335 WOOD POST TO CONCRETE CONNECTION FOLLOW TRUSS CONNECTOR INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS USP CONNECTORS CBS66 5,525 SIMPSON CONNECTORS CBS66 5,335 WOOD POST TO CONCRETE CONNECTION FOLLOW TRUSS CONNECTOR INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS USP CONNECTORS HD2X 1,320 SIMPSON CONNECTORS H16 1,470 TRUSS/RAFTER ANCHOR JOIST CONCRETE/WOOD FOLLOW TRUSS CONNECTOR INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS USP CONNECTORS RT-16 1,030 SIMPSON CONNECTORS H10 990 TRUSS/RAFTER TIE DOWNS WOOD FOLLOW TRUSS CONNECTOR INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS USP CONNECTORS SHA6 4,255 SIMPSON CONNECTORS MGT 3,330 MAS. UPLIFT CONNECTOR CONCRETE 2-PLY FOLLOW TRUSS CONNECTOR INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS USP CONNECTORS SHA6 6,110 SIMPSON CONNECTORS MGT 3,330 MAS. UPLIFT CONNECTOR CONCRETE 3+-PLY'S FOLLOW TRUSS CONNECTOR INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS USP CONNECTORS RT-22F 1,225 SIMPSON CONNECTORS LSTA21 1,235 TRUSS/RAFTER TIE DOWNS WOOD FOLLOW TRUSS CONNECTOR INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS USP CONNECTORS RT-22T 1,225 SIMPSON CONNECTORS HST20 1,245 TRUSS/RAFTER TIE DOWNS WOOD FOLLOW TRUSS CONNECTOR INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS SIMPSON CONNECTORS FGTR 4,300 TRUSS ANCHOR, HIGH UPLIFT CONCRETE FOLLOW TRUSS CONNECTOR INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS SIMPSON CONNECTORS (2) FGTR'S 8,080 TRUSS ANCHOR, HIGH UPLIFT CONCRETE FOLLOW TRUSS CONNECTOR INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS USP CONNECTORS RT16 (A) 1,030 SIMPSON CONNECTORS H14 1,050 TRUSS/RAFTER TIE DOWNS WOOD FOLLOW TRUSS CONNECTOR INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS USP CONNECTORS LUGT2 1,945 SIMPSON CONNECTORS LGT2 1,785 TRUSS/RAFTER TIE DOWNS CONCRETE/WOOD FOLLOW TRUSS CONNECTOR INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS USP CONNECTORS PHD2 4,770 SIMPSON CONNECTORS PHD2 3,610 TRUSS/RAFTER TIE DOWNS CONCRETE/WOOD FOLLOW TRUSS CONNECTOR INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS USP CONNECTORS PHD6 7,155 SIMPSON CONNECTORS PHD6 5,860 TRUSS/RAFTER TIE DOWNS CONCRETE/WOOD FOLLOW TRUSS CONNECTOR INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS USP CONNECTORS RS150 5,115 SIMPSON CONNECTORS (3) CS16 5,115 TRUSS/RAFTER TIE DOWNS WOOD 2 X 8 P. T. ON BOTH SIDES OF OPENING WITH SIMPSON LS50 AT EACH - END NAILED TO BUCKING 2 X 8 P. T. BUCKING FASTENED TO MASONRY WITH 3/16" X 3 1/4" "TAPCON" SCREWS AT 18" O. C. MAX. (OR 2 1/4" CASE-HARDENED NAILS AT 6" SPACING); PLACE FIRST FASTENERS 4" FROM EACH END OF BUCKING CONCRETE TIE BEAM I (ABOVE OPENING) 2 X 8 P. T. STUDS AT 8" FROM MASONRY WALL AND AT 12" MAX. SIMPSON A33 ANGLE FASTENED TO BUCKING WITH (4)-lod NAILS SIMPSON LS50 WITH (8)-lod NAILS 4-PLY 15/32" CDX (OR BETTER) PLYWOOD FASTEN TO BLOCKING WITH (4)-lod NAILS ALONG UNDERSIDE OF OPENING 2 X 4 P. T. BLOCKING; CUT ENDS TO FIT ARC AS NEEDED; FASTEN TO ANGLED 2 X 8 MEMBER WITH (3)-lod NAILS; MAX. SPACING OF BLOCKING 6" O. C. APPLY 4-PLY 15/32" CDX (OR BETTER) PLYWOOD TO OUTER FACE OF ARCH; GLUE AND FASTEN TO ALL FRAMING MEMBERS WITH 8d NAILS AT 3" SPACING CONCRETE BLOCK; CELLS ADJACENT TO - OPENING REINF. AND FILLED W/CONCRETE ARCHED WINDOW FRAMING DETAIL (MAY ALSO BE USED FOR CIRCLEHEAD, SQUARE OR ELLIPTICAL UNITS) (OPENING DEPICTED IS FOR 72" WIDE UNIT WITH 18" RISE AT CENTERLINE; ACTUAL OPENINGS MAY HAVE MORE OR LESS STUDS AND BLOCKING) THIS DETAIL WAS PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE NOTE: CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION R301 OF COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 3,000 PSI AT 28 DAYS THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE - RESIDENTIAL (FBC, 7th EDITION) FOR A DESIGN WIND SPEED ALL FRAMING MEMBERS TO BE SOUTHERN OF 170 M.P.H. YELLOW PINE GRADE #2 (OR BETTER) NOTE: DRAWING HAS NOT BEEN MADE TO A PARTICULAR SCALE MASONRY OPENING 6 4' MAXIMUM DOUGH OPENING WINDOW SI 00 MASONRY? ( 1 X 3 P.T. FURRING #5 BAR IN \GYPSUM BOARD FINISH FILLED CELL WINDOW UNIT TO BE ATTACHED NOTE: THESE BUCKS MAY BE THROUGH BUCKING AND INTO MASONRY PLACED USING "CHEM-CAULK" SUBSTRATE PER MANUFACTURER'S ADHESIVE AND HARDENED RECOMMENDATIONS AND AS PER IMPACT NAILS (0.099" X 1.5") FLORIDA BUILDING CODE -RESIDENTIAL AT 6" O. C.; ALL BUCKING (7th EDITION) 3 1/2" OR WIDER MAY BE 1 X 4 P. T. BUCKING FASTENED APPLIED USING IMPACT NAILS W/ 3/16" X 2 1/2" "TAPCON" ONLY (NO ADHESIVE) SCREWS AT 18" O. C. ALONG FULL PERIMETER OF OPENING INSTALL SCREWS BEGINNING AT 6" FROM INSIDE CORNER OF OPENING THIS DETAIL WAS PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION R613.6 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE -RESIDENTIAL (FBC), 7th EDITION; THE DESIGN WIND SPEED IS 170 MPH WINDOW BUCKING DETAIL ROOF SHEATHING NAILING CRITERIA: PLACE #5 CORNER BARS ON TOP AND - I I BOTTOM OF THE OUTSIDE STEEL AT FOOTER CORNERS AND INTERSECTIONS AS SHOWN; PROVIDE A MIN. OF 40 BAR DIAMETER (25") OVERLAP TYPICAL CORNER BAR REINFORCEMENT DROP FOOTING DETAIL ALL ZONES FOR GABLE AND FLAT ROOFS 0-70: sheathing to be min. 51811 cdx 4 ply plywood attatched W/ 8d ring shank nails 6" o.c. on edges & 6" o.c. in centers of ply ALL ZONES FOR GABLE AND FLAT ROOFS 70< 0< 450: sheathing to be min. 51811 cdx 4 ply plywood attatched w/ 8d ring shank nails 6" o.c. on edges & 6" o.c. in centers of ply ALL ZONES FOR HIP ROOFS 70 < 0 < 450 sheathing to be min. 5/8" cdx 4 ply plywood attatched w/ 8d ring shank nails 4" o.c. on edges & 4" o.c. in centers of ply WALL & FLOOR SHEATHING NAILING CRITERIA: ZONE 4: sheathing to be min. 1/2" cdx 4 ply plywood attatched w/ 8d ring shank nails 6" o.c. on edges & 6" o.c. in centers of ply. ZONE 5: sheathing to be min. 1/2" cdx 4 ply plywood attatched w/ 8d ring shank nails 3" o.c. on edges & 6" o.c. in centers of ply. ERAMING NOTE: INTERIOR LOAD -BEARING WALLS TO BE CONSTRUCTED OF MIN. 2 X 4 STUDS AT 16" MAX. SPACING, NO. 3 STANDARD GRADE (OR BETTER). PROVIDE DOUBLE TOP PLATE AND SINGLE PRESSURE -TREATED SILL PLATE SAME SIZE AS STUDS. ANCHOR SILL PLATE TO SLAB WITH MIN. 1/2" DIAM. BOLTS AT 32" MAX. SPACING, MIN. 7" EMBEDMENT INTO CONCRETE. INSTALL SIMPSON MSTA24 STRAPS AT TOP AND BOTTOM ENDS OF STUDS; WRAP OVER TOP PLATES AND BENEATH SILL PLATES AND FASTEN TO OPPOSITE EDGE OF STUDS USING (18)-iod NAILS PER STRAP AT HOLES PROVIDED BY MANUFACTURER. REFER TO SECTION 2306 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE FOR REQUIRED FRAMING FASTENERS AND TO SECTION 2308 FOR TOP & BOTTOM PLATE REQUIREMENTS ,AND LIMITATIONS ON CUTTING, NOTCHING AND BORING OF HOLES THROUGH LOAD -BEARING FRAMING MEMBERS. MASONRY OPENING 6 4' MAXIMUM ROUGH OPENING THRESHOLD SHIM (3/8" MAX.) OUTSIDE OF SLADEEBD� El `7_1 771)�II J DOOR/ PANEL MASONRY 1 X 3 P.T. FURRING #5 BAR IN GYPSUM BOARD FINISH FILLED CELL DOOR FRAME TO BE ATTACHED 1. INSTALL HINGE SCREWS. THROUGH BUCKING AND INTO MASONRY (#10 X 2 1/2") IN TOP OF HINGE. SUBSTRATE W/ NO. 8 GALVANIZED FINISH 2. INSTALL LOCK SET. NAILS AT 12" O. C. FOR SINGLE -LEAF DOORS, 3. INSTALL SECURITY STRIKE SCREWS 3" O. C. FOR DOUBLE -LEAF DOORS. (#8 X 2 1/2") IN STRIKE PLATE; ADJUST STRIKE PLATE FOR SECURE DOOR FIT, 2 X 4 P.T. BUCKING FASTENED AND TIGHTEN SCREWS. W/ 3/16" X 4" "TAPCON" 4. SET ALL NAILS. SCREWS AT T C0. C. ALONG 5. DOORS MUST BE SOLID -CORE WOOD FULL PERIMETER C. OPENING OR METAL -CLAD EXTERIOR GRADE. FOR SINGLE -LEAF DOORS 6. TOP, MIDDLE AND BOTTOM LOCKING AT 12" O. C. FOR DOUBLE1EAF DOORS BOLTS REQUIRED FOR DOUBLE DOORS. INSTALL SCREWS BEGINNING AT 6" FROM INSIDE CORNER OF OPENING THIS DETAIL WAS PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION R613.6 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE -RESIDENTIAL (FBC), 7th EDITION; THE DESIGN WIND SPEED IS 170 MPH DOOR BUCKING DETAIL MASONRY OPENING 16-0" MAXIMUM DOOR on 3-0" 12'-0" TOP OF TIEBEAM TIEBEAM SIZE AND REINFORCING AS SPECIFIED ON S3 25" PRE -BENT BAR LAP SPLICE 12" X 12" CONCRETE BLOCK COLUMN W/4-#5'S VERTICAL & #2 TIES AT 16" O.C. & GROUT -FILLED CORE A TOP OF SLAB TOP OF FTG 0 6-#5'S EACH WAY TYP. LANAI COLUMN SECTION #5 BAR IN (2) CONSECUTIVE FILLED CELLS EACH SIDE MASONRY/ 1 X 3 P.T. FURRING 1 X 6 P.T. TRIM GYPSUM BOARD FINISH ATTACH OVERHEAD DOOR TRACKS TO STRUCTURE PER MANUFACTURER' SPECIFICATIONS. 2 X 6 P.T. BUCKING FASTENED W/ 1/2" EXPANSION BOLTS 4" LONG AT MAX. 24" O. C. ALONG SIDES AND MASONRY HEADER (IF APPLICABLE); INSTALL FIRST BOLTS 8" FROM EACH END. THIS DETAIL WAS PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION R613.6 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE -RESIDENTIAL (FBC), 7th EDITION; THE DESIGN WIND SPEED IS 170 MPH GARAGE DOOR OPENINGS SCALE: 3/4" = P-0" EXISTING 8" WIDE - TIE BEAM 2 X 8 P.T. TOP PLATE 518" STUCCO FINISH OVER METAL LATH OVER 30# BUILDING PAPER (STUCCO - FINISH TO MATCH EXISTING) Design Wind Speed Nominal Wind Velocity (mph) 170 Exposure C Internal Pressure Enclosed Building Information Height above ground, z (ft.) 2.00 Building Width (ft.) 68.67 Building Length (ft.) 49.50 Edge Strip, a (ft.) 4.95 Roof Type Hip Ridge Height, h, (ft) 58.50 Eave Height, h. (ft) 41.33 Parapet Along Roof Perimeter (ft.) 0.00 Mean Roof Height (h) - (ft.) 35.00 Roof Slope (x:12) 6.00 Roof Angle (degrees) 26.57 Toposraphic Information Hill Shape Flat- No Hill H, (ft.) 0.00 Lh, (ft.) 0•00 X, (ft.) 0.00 z, ft. 0•00 O Z APPLYING WIND LOAD FOR: ZONE OPENING ELEVATION (ft) WIDTH (in.) LENGTH (in.) EFFECTIVE WIND AREA (sq.ft.) Nominal Wind Load Pressures MAXIMUM POSITIVE PRESSURE (psf) MAXIMUM NEGATIVE PRESSURE (psf) DOOR 1 4 72.0 96.0 48.0 40.6 -44.4 DOOR 2 4 144.0 96.0 96.0 38.5 -42.4 DOOR 3 4 240.0 96.0 160.0 37.0 -40.9 • DOOR 4 5 96.0 96.0 64.0 39.7 -49.6 : DOOR 7 4 64.0 96.0 42.7 40.9 -44.7 DOOR 8 4 180.0 96.0 120.0 37.9 -41.7 DOOR 9 5 144.0 96.0 96.0 38.5 -47.2 DOOR 14 4 240.0 120.0 200.0 36.4 -40.2 DOOR 15 5 96.0 120.0 80.0 39.1 -48.3 WINDOW A 5 24.0 51.0 8.5 45.2 -60.5 WINDOW B 4 24.0 36.0 6.0 45.2 -49.0 WINDOW C 4 72.0 84.0 42.0 41.0 -44.8 WINDOW D 5 37.0 76.0 19.5 43.2 -56.6 WINDOW E 4 96.0 100.0 66.7 39.6 -43.4 WINDOW F 5 64.0 100.0 44.4 40.8 -51.7 WINDOW H 4 60.0 24.0 10.0 45.2 -49.0 WINDOW J 4 72.0 39.0 19.5 43.2 -47.0 WINDOW K 5 28.0 28.0 5.4 45.2 -60.5 WINDOW L 4 28.0 24.0 4.7 45.2 -49.0 PRE-ENGINEERED TRUS SEE TRUSS DWGS-� (2) SIMPSON H10 TIES PER EA. 2X6 BLOCK (2) 2 x 4 TOP PLATES CONTINUOUS (3) 16d NAILS @ EA. 2X6 2 x 4 VERT. STUDS @ 16" O.C. 3/4" CDX M. GRADE PLYWOC W/6d NAILS @ 3" O.C. 2 x 4 HORIZONTAL BLOCKING ATTACH TO VERT. STUDS - W/(3) 10d NAILS EA. END REFER TO DOOR AND WINDOW SCHEDULES FOR CALLOUT REFERENCES (2) 2X6 #2 SYP BLOCKING @ 24"O.C. W/(2) 16d NAILS EA. TRUSS (2) SIMPSON H10 TIES PER EA. 2X6 BLOCK (3) 16d NAILS AT EA. BLOCK 2 x 4 DIAGONAL BRACING @ 16" O.C. ALTERNATE DIRECTION @ EA. STUD 3/4" CDX EXT. GRADE PLYWOOD 2 LAYER 3/4" PLYWOOD GLUE &NAIL WITH 6d NAILS IN TWO ROWS @ 6" CENTERS FRAMING PARALLEL TO TRUSSES (2) SIMPSON H10 TIES @ EA. TRUSS (2) 2 x 4 TOP PLATES CONTINIinlfa (3) 16d NAILS @ EA. TRUSS 2 x 4 VERT. STUDS @ 16" O.C. 3/4" CDX EXT. GRADE PLYWOOD W/6d NAILS @ 3" O.C. HORIZONTAL BLOCKING ATTACH TO VERT. STUIi3- W/(3) iod NAILS FA. END HEADER SUPPORTED FROM TRUSSES ABOVE SLIDING DOORS AND MITERED WINDOWS PROVIDE 3/16" TAPCON, 3" LONG AT 16" O.C. R-19 BATT. INSULATION 1 X 2 P.T. FURRING AT 16" O. C. i� 1/2" GYPSUM BOARD 2 X 8 STUDS @ 16" O.C. - Q SIMPSON H2.5 CLIP AT EACH \0 W STUD TO BTTM. PLATE isa 2 X 8 BOTTOM PLATE 1/2" 4-PLY CDX PLYWOOD SHEATHING NEW SLIDING GLASS DOOR or WINDOW (SEE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS) 2 X 8 BOTTOM PLATE DOES NOT NEED ATTACHED AT ENDS DROPPED HEADER EXTENSION DETAIL N.T.S PRE-ENGINEERED TRUSSES SEE TRUSS DWGS. (2) SIMPSON HIO TIES @ EA. TRUSS (2) 2 x 4 TOP PLATES CONTINUOUS (3) 16d NAILS @ EA. TRUSS DIAGONAL BRACING @ 16" O.C. ALTERNATE DIRECTION @ EA. STUD 3/4" CDX EXT. GRADE PLYWOOD 2 LAYER 3/4" PLYWOOD GLUE & NAIL WITH 6D NAILS IN TWO ROWS @ 6" CENTERS FRAMING PERPENDICULAR TO TRUSSES #5 BARS @ 8" SPACING CANT. FROM UPPER DECK #4 BARS @ 12" SPACING #4 BARS @ EA.NOSE • #5 BARS @ 8" SPACING 1211 MIN PROVIDE MIN 30" SPLICE OVERLAP i 0 12" X 24" CONCRETE FOOTING, _ FULL WIDTH OF STAIRS REINFORCED WITH 4-#5 BARS CONT. 4" 01 CONCRETE STAIR CONSTRUCTIONS CTION SCALE: 3/4" = P-0" 0 w , J ow ao: U u W U F 6 Z oW U X J ww a i7)z c z a 00LC z agwe w ` wm - o m ° p w u U)W o FD ! a `- o0 w� w 5 a o�- Uo a wa S z a o. \11111. \ Co 00 Z N Y ' Ui In z X f) j F K & Associates, Inc. �i L!� W L!� 1111111�1��,''/� ',, '%, w r ..,�... /� % I = - Z O OJ pz * aoZ- Y�xt N� ?�O "LLz _U of o dLL L 111111111111`1`\``` DATE: 06-09-2023 SCALE: NTS DRAWN: DC / DW JOB: 2023- SHEET: S 6 LL Y V O 0 O C ca N .' N L s H CD L0 0 m O N 0 O O M C4 O N J a M M 0 M SCALE: 3/4" = 1'4' SCALE: 3/4" = P-0" OF 7 SHEETS Packet Pg. 146 DIVISION 4: MASONRY 3.B.g STRUCTURAL NOTES DIVISION l: GENERAL CODE REQUIREMENTS: THE BUILDING STRUCTURE IS DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 7TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE (FBC 7th EDITION - RESIDENTIAL) AND "MINIMUM DESIGN LOADS FOR BUILDINGS AND OTHER STRUCTURES", ASCE 7-16 USING "C & C" METHOD. FOLLOW ALL APPLICABLE PROVISIONS FOR ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION. SEE CHAPTER 35 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE FOR THE LIST OF ALL REFERENCED STANDARDS. DESIGN CRITERIA: DESIGN WAS BASED ON STRENGTH AND DEFLECTION CRITERIA OF THE LATEST EDITION OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODETIN ADDITION TO THE DEAD LOADS, THE FOLLOWING LOADS AND ALLOWABLES WERE USED FOR DESIGN: ROOF: WOOD TRUSSES GRAVITY WIND T L�SF TC9L__5 PSF TCDL 10 PSF BCDL 5 PSF BCDL 10 PSF TOTAL 40 -P-ST TO AL 10 PS FIRST FLOOR: 5" SLAB ON GRADE LL 100 PSF DL 50 PSF SECOND FLOOR: 18" WOOD FLOOR TRUSS SYSTEM LL 50 PSF DL 50 PSF THIRD FLOOR 18" WOOD FLOOR TRUSS SYSTEM LL 50 PSF DL 50 PSF STAIRS LL 50 PSF DL 50 PSF WIND SPEED (ULTIMATE) Vult = 170 MPH WIND SPEED (NOMINAL) Vasd = 131.7 MPH EXPOSURE C RISK CATEGORY CATEGORY II INTERNAL PRESSURE COEFF + / - 0.18 ENCLOSED (IMPACT RESISTANT PROTECTED ASSUMED SOIL BEARING CAPACITY 2000 PSF ALL DETAILS AND SECTIONS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS ARE TYPICAL AND APPLY TO ANY SIMILAR SITUATIONS ELSEWHERE EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE INDICATED. ADAPT REQUIREMENTS OF DETAILS, SECTIONS, PLANS, AND NOTES AT ALL LOCATIONS AT WHICH CONDITIONS ARE SIMILAR. STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS SHALL BE USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH JOB SPECIFICATIONS AND ARCHITECTURAL, MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING AND SITE DRAWINGS. CONSULT THESE DRAWINGS FOR SLEEVES, DEPRESSIONS, AND OTHER DETAILS NOT SHOWN ON STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS. THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF THE COMPLETED STRUCTURE DEPENDS ON INTERACTION OF VARIOUS CONNECTEDCOMPONENTS. PROVIDE ADEQUATE BRACING, SHORING, AND OTHER TEMPORARY SUPPORTS AS REQUIRED TO SAFELY COMPLETE THE WORK THE STRUCTURE SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS HAS BEEN DESIGNED FOR STABILITY UNDER FINAL CONFIGURATION ONLY. DIVISION 2: FOUNDATIONS IN THE ABSENCE OF A GEOTECHNICAL FOUNDATION REPORT, AND BASED ON SIMILAR ADJACENT SITE CONDITIONS, IT IS PROPOSED TO SUPPORT THIS STRUCTURE ON A DRIVEN CONCRETE PILE FOUNDATION. THE WORK SHALL CONSIST OF FURNISHING AND DRIVING 10" X 10" PRECAST CONCRETE PILES AT THE LOCATION SHOWN ON SHEET S1 AND TO THE REQUIRED ULTIMATE PILE CAPACITY OF 15 TONS PER PILE. TEST PILES WILL BE REQUIRED TO DETERMINE FINAL PILE BEARING CAPACITY, PRODUCTION PILE LENGTH AND TO DEVELOP "UNDER THE HAMMER" DRIVING CRITERION. FINAL NUMBER OF PRODUCTION PILES TO BE DETERMINED AFTER DRIVING TEST PILES. DIVISION 3: CONCRETE REINFORCED CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE FBC AND ACI 318 "BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS FORREINFORCED CONCRETE". CONCRETE STRENGTHS SHALL BE VERIFIED BY STANDARD 28-DAY CYLINDER TESTS PER ASTM C39, AND SHALL BEAS FOLLOWS: LOCATION STRENGTH FOUNDATIONS 3000 PSI SLABS ON GRADE 3000 PSI ELEVATED SLABS 3000 PSI EPICORE SLABS 4000 PSI BEAMS AND COLUMNS 3000 PSI CEMENT SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM C-150, TYPE 1, FLY ASH CONFORMING TO ASTM C618, TYPE F OR TYPE C, MAY BE USED TO REPLACE UP TO 20% OF THE CEMENT CONTENT, PROVIDED THAT THE MIX STRENGTH IS SUBSTANTIATED BY TEST DATA. COARSE AGGREGATE SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM C-33 WITH A MAXIMUM SIZE OF 4". FINE AGGREGATE TO BE CLEAN, DURABLE, NATURAL SAND CONFORMING TO ASTM C-33. SHORING AND RESHORING: SHORING AND RESHORING SHALL CONFORM TO ACI 347. SHORING AND SUPPORTING FORMWORK SHALL NOT BE REMOVED ROM HORIZONTAL MEMBERS BEFORE CONCRETE STRENGTH IS AT LEAST 70 PERCENT OF DESIGN STRENGTH, AS DETERMINED BY FIELD CURE CYLINDERS. IN ADDITION, SHORING SHALL NOT BE REMOVED SOONER THAN RECOMMENDED BYACI 347. FORMWORK SHALL NOT BE REMOVED IN LESS THAN TEN (10) DAYS. REINFORCING STEEL: REINFORCING STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A615, GRADE 60, FOR DEFORMED BAR AND ASTM A185 FOR SMOOTH W L WIRE FABRIC (WWF), UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. REINFORCING STEEL TO BE WELDED SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A706. REINFORCING STEEL SHALL BE SECURELY TIED IN PLACE WITH #16 ANNEALED IRON WIRE. GRADE 40 MAY BE USED IN POOL SHELL. REQUIRED CONCRETE COVER FOR REINFORCING STEEL (UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE): FOOTINGS 3" BOTTOM AND SIDES, 2" TOP INT SLABS AND WALL 4" (NOT EXPOSED TO GROUND OR WEATHER) COLUMNS 11" TO TIES BEAM li" TO STIRRUPS EXT SLABS AND WALL 1 (EXPOSED TO GROUND OR WEATHER, #5 OR SMALLER) EXT SLABS AND WALLS 2 (EXPOSED TO GROUND OR WEATHER, #6 OR LARGER) WEDGE STYLE ANCHORING: WEDGE STYLE ANCHORS SHALL BE USED IN SOLID CONCRETE OR GROUT -FILLED MASONRY APPLICATIONS. ACCP ANCHORS FOR CONCRETE ARE SIMPSON STRONG -BOLT, HILTI KWIK-BOLT-TZ, POWERS POWER-STUD+SD AND ACCEPTED ANCHORS FOR GROUT -FILLED MASONRY ARE SIMPSON WEDGE -ALL, HILTI KWIK-BOLT-3 OR POWERS POWER -STUD. INSTALLED IN LOCATIONS, DIAMETERS AND LENGTHS PER STRUCTURAL PLANS. MASONRY WALLS: MASONRY UNITS SHALL MEET ASTM C90. ASSEMBLIES SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF` m= 1500 PSI. MORTAR SHALL BE TYPE "M" OR "S" AND MEET ASTM C270. GROUT SHALL BE 3000 PSI MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH AND MEET ASTM C476. PERMISSIBLE SLUMP RANGE IS 8" TO 11". ALL CELLS CONTAINING VERTICAL BARS, BOND BEAMS, AND ALL CELLS BELOW GRADE SHALL BE FILLED WITH GROUT. MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF GROUT POUR ALLOWED IS 4'-O" UNLESS CLEAN -OUT OPENING IS PROVIDED AT BOTTOM OF CELLS TO BE FILLED. PROVIDE REINFORCING BARS AT CORNERS, INTERSECTIONS, EACH SIDE OF OPENINGS OVER 4 FEET WIDE, AND AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. PROVIDE HOOKED DOWELS INTO FOOTINGS AND STRUCTURE ABOVE AND/OR BELOW TO PROVIDE CONTINUITY. PROVIDE 9 GAUGE GALVANIZED LADDER TYPE HORIZONTAL JOINT REINFORCING (DUR-O-WALL) AT 16" O.C. FOR CMU WALLS OVER 10'-0" TIE BEAMS: TIE BEAMS SHALL BE CONCRETE, POURED AFTER THE BLOCK WALLS BELOW ARE IN PLACE. REINFORCING SHALL BE CONTINUOUS THROUGH TIE BEAMS WITH MINIMUM LAP SPLICES OF 48 BAR DIAMETERS AND BENT BARS AT CORNERS. USE METAL LATH, MORTAR, OR SPECIAL UNITS TO CONFINE CONCRETE TO AREA REQUIRED. PRECAST CONCRETE LINTELS: UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE, ALL LINTELS TO BE "U" TYPE PRECAST CONCRETE UNITS EQUAL TO UNITS MANUFACTURED BY CAST CRETE CORP. AND PRESTRESSED (AND ADDITIONALLY REINFORCED AS REQUIRED) IN ACCORDANCE WITH CAST CRETE CORP. "DESIGN MANUAL", LATEST EDITION, FOR THE SPAN AND LOADING CONDITION RELATIVE TO LINTEL LOCATION. PROVIDE 8" MINIMUM BEARING FOR LINTELS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. DIVISION 5: STRUCTURAL STEEL STRUCTURAL STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A992, GRADE 50. PLATES AND ANGLES SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A36. TUBES SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A500, GRADE B (Fy= 46KSI). PIPES SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A53 GRADE B (Fy = 35KSI). DESIGN, FABRICATION AND ERECTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE "AISC SPECIFICATION FOR THE DESIGN, FABRICATION AND ERECTION OF STRUCTURAL STEEL FOR BUILDINGS". ANCHOR BOLTS SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A307 OR A36. EPICORE MSR 20 GA. COMPOSIT DECK: THE COMPOSITE FLOOR DECK PANELS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S APPROVED ERECTION DRAWINGS, SDI PUBLICATION NO. 30, SDI MANUAL OF CONSTRUCTION WITH STEEL DECK. DESIGN IS BASED ON THE USE OF REGULAR WEIGHT CONCRETE (150 PCF) WITH A COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 4000 PSI. REINFORCING STEEL ,OTHER THAN THE EPICORE MSR, SHALL HAVE A YIELD STRENGTH OF 60,000 PSI.. MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE DEFLECTION UNDER THE TOTAL LOAD (LIVE + DEAD) IS LIMITED TO L/360. FOR SIMPLE SPANS NO REINFORCING STEEL, OTHER THAN EPICORE MSR, IS REQUIRED. FOR CONTINUOUS SPANS REINFORCING STEEL IS REQUIRED OVER INTERIOR SUPPORTS. TEMPERATURE AND SHRINKAGE REINFORCEMENT, CONSISTING OF WELDED WIRE FABRIC, SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 6X6-W1.4 X W1.4. ALL LISTED SPANS ARE TO BE MEASURED FROM CENTER TO CENTER OF THE SUPPORTS. DECK PANELS SHALL BE PLACED WITH ENDS HAVING A MINIMUM BEARING OF 12 INCHES ON THE SUPPORTING FRAMES. DIVISION 6: WOOD WOOD CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO AITC, NATIONAL DESIGN SPECIFICATION. STRUCTURAL WOOD COMPONENTS (BEAMS, JOISTS, RAFTERS, ETC.) SHALL HAVE THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM ALLOWABLE FIBER STRESS OF #2 SOUTHERN PINE AS FOLLOWS: SHEAR ALL Fv = 90 PSI BENDING 2X6 Fb = 1250 PSI BENDING 2X8 Fb = 1200 PSI BENDING 2X10 Fb = 1050 PSI BENDING 2X12 Fb = 975 PSI BENDING LVL Fb = 2400 PSI WOOD FRAMING CONNECTORS: CONNECTORS SHALL BE SIMPSON Z-MAX CODED OR EQUIVALENT. CONNECTOR MODEL NUMBERS SHOWN ARE STRONG -TIE CONNECTORS AS MANUFACTURED BY SIMPSON STRONG -TIE COMPANY. USG CONNECTORS ARE ACCEPTABLE SUBSTITUTIONS. UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE, INSTALL SIZE AND NUMBER OF FASTENERS SHOWN IN LATEST SIMPSON CATALOG. MISCELLANEOUS: THIS STRUCTURE IS TO BE LOCATED IN THE COASTAL FLOOD HAZARD ZONE. ALL ELECTRICAL AND MECHANICAL DEVICES SHALL BE LOCATED AT OR ABOVE THE FLOOD PLAIN ELEVATION. COORDINATION OF CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING VERIFICATION OF DIMENSIONS AND FIELD CONDITIONS, IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. OWNER AND/OR CONTRACTOR TO DETERMINE DEPTH OF POOL AND/OR SPA. THE ENGINEER SHALL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR POOL OR SPA DEPTH. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AND FIELD LOCATE VENTILATION FOR RELIEF OF HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE. PROVIDE MINIMUM OF 1 SQ. IN. PER 1 SQ. FT. OF GARAGE SLAB. INSTALL BOTTOM OF VENT AT A MAXIMUM OF 12" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. RECESS AND CURBS FOR DOORS ARE NOT SHOWN. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL FLOOR PLAN FOR SIZE AND LOCATION. 0 W ul 0 W ao: U u W U F zZ w U o O� J p W W p Z C z � oL 0 o p Z�� LL, w s wW m - U � o 02 W p �D LL z a- U) W EL o H C Uo p wa z a a Q w 00 m %, w F ............ � %, = Z LL Z Co 0 O J p z co ) zQ LLz _U of W DATE : 06-09-2023 SCALE: NTS DRAWN: DC / DW JOB: 2023- SHEET: S 7 LL Y 0 c 0 21) F_ �n s F_ a) 0 m ti 00 N O 0 0 M N O N J a M M O o� J � K & Associates, Inc. OF 7 SHEETS Packet Pg. 147 PL20230002187 3.B.h HEARING PACKAGE CHECKLIST A. Backup provided by the County Planner L The agent is responsible for all required data included in the digital file of information for the Hearing Examiner in (Hex) or the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC). DO ACCEPT DUPLICATES OF ANY DOCUMENTS. MAKE SURE ONLY THE LATEST, ACCEPTED/APPROVED COPY OF THE BELOW DOCUMENTATION. PLEASE CONFIRM THE rn DOCUMENTS ARE IN THE ORDER DESCRIBED IN 'BACKUP PROVIDED BY APPLICANT." r 0 Planner responsible for providing the County Attorney -drafted Ordinance for PUDs and placing in backupco m materials. AGENTS DO NOT INCLUDE THE PUD DOCUMENT — STAFF PROVIDES THIS TO THE COUNTY ATTORNEY N WHEN THE ORDINANCE IS DRAFTED FOR A PUD. THE FINAL PUD ORDINANCE/RESOLUTION IS THE FIRST ITEM o 0 AFTER THE STAFF REPORT. [FOR HEX, THE REQUESTED LANGUAGE/ PROPOSED PLAN IS THE FIRST ITEM AFTER THE N 0 STAFF REPORT] N a M B. Backup provided bV Applicant: CD N PLEASE PROVIDE THE DOCUMENTS IN THE ORDER DESCRIBED BELOW. DO NOT PROVIDE DUPLICATES OF ANY DOCUMENTS. PROVIDE ONLY THE LATEST, ACCEPTED/APPROVED COPY OF THE BELOW DOCUMENTATION. IF THE BACKUP PROVIDED BY APPLICANT IS IN DISARRAY -MEANING IT IS NOT IN THE PROPER ORDER AND/OR THE E APPLICANT PROVIDES MULTIPLE DUPLICATES -THE APPLICANT COULD LOSE ITS HEARING DATE. o X Application, to include but not limited to the following: X Narrative of request X Property Information X Property Ownership Disclosure Form X Any other documents required by the specific petition type; such as a variance, a boat dock extension; PUD amendment, rezone request, etc. X Disclosure of Property Ownership Interest (if there is additional documentation aside from disclosure form) Affidavit of Unified Control X Affidavit of Authorization X Drawings (may include Cross -Section (for BDEs generally), proposed Boat Dock(s) with Water depth, location maps etc.) NIM Information (Sign in sheet, notes, minutes and transcript/or summary) ✓ Include 3 thumbnail drives of video and/or audio Traffic Impact Study (TIS) Environmental Data Historical/Archeological Survey or Waiver Utility Letter X Deviation Justifications Revised5/18/2018 Provide to Agents G:\CDESPlanningServices\Current\Zoning Staff Information\JobAides orHelp Guides Packet Pg. 148 3.B.h X Boundary Survey X Other documents, as needed, on a case -by -case basis such as relevant prior Ordinances, Conditional Uses, historical documents, any "private or legal" agreements affecting the PUD etc. L X Submerged Resource Surveys may be included here if required. C� X flash drive with only one pdf file for all documents rn r I understand that by submitting the above materials, it is the agent's/applicant's responsibility to ensure all materials are in the same m ti order for flash dr'v must ontain the documents in one pdf file. It is the agent's responsibility to ensure no documentation is left out. o r N 5/15/2024 0 0 Signature of Agent Representative Date c N J Jeff Rogers a Printed Name of Signing Agent Representative cM', 0 rn N Revised5/18/2018 Provide to Agents G:\CDESPlanningServices\Current\Zoning Staff Information\Job Aides or Help Guides Packet Pg. 149 Co T County Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1036 1 Email: GMDClientServices@colliercountyfl.gov www.colliercountyfl.gov Boat Dock Facility Extension OR Boathouse Establishment Petition Land Development Code Section 5.03.06 Chapter 3 B of the Administrative Code THIS PETITION IS FOR (check one): �✓ DOCK EXTENSION Q✓ BOATHOUSE APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of Property Owner(s): Peter & Jacqueline Travisano Name of Applicant if different than owner: 3.B.h Address: 10817 Garden Ridge Court City: Davie State. FL Zip: 33328 Telephone: Cell: 410-400-2333 E-Mail Address: PTRAVISANO@TRAVISANOCONSTRUCTION.COM Name of Agent: Jeff Rogers Firm: Turrell - Hall & Associates, Inc. Address: 3584 Exchange Ave City: Naples State: FL ZIP: 34104 Telephone: 239-643-0166 Cell: 239-784-0081 E-Mail Address: Jeff@thanaples.com Section/Township/Range: 32 / 5,/ 26 PROPERTY LOCATION Property I.D. Number: 52395960007 Subdivision: Isles of Capri Unit: 2 Lot: 285 Block Address/ General Location of Subject Property: 159 Tahiti Street Naples, FL 34113 Current Zoning and Land use of Subject Property: RSF-4 and Vacant Land r m m L v/ r LO r 0 m ti co N O O O M N O N J d M M O O N 03/2023 Packet Pg. 150 Co er County Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1036 1 Email: GMDClientServices@colliercountyfl.gov www.colliercountyfl.gov BE AWARE THAT COLLIER COUNTY HAS LOBBYIST REGULATIONS. GUIDE YOURSELF ACCORDINGLY AND ENSURE THAT YOU ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THESE REGULATIONS. ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE Zoning Land Use N RSF-4 Vacant Land S RSF-4 Single -Family Residential E A-ST Tarpon Bay W RSF-4 Tahiti Street 3.B.h DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Narrative description of project (indicate extent of work, new dock, replacement, addition to existing facility, any other pertinent information): See Attached SITE INFORMATION 1. Water Width: 149 ft. Measurement from: E plat ft. other (specify) 2. Total Property Water Frontage: 134.4 ft. 3. Setbacks: Provided: 29.6 8d ft. Required: 15&15 ft. 4. Total Protrusion of Proposed Facility into Water: 30 S. Number and Lengths of Vessels to Use Facitlity: 1. 26 ft. 2. ft. ❑✓ survey ❑ visual estimate 6. If applicable, the distance between dock facilities per the Land Development Code section 5.03.06 H.1.d. 100 ft. 7. List any additional dock facilities inclose proximity to the subject property and indicate the total protrusion into the waterway of each: 37-foot dock on adjacent property to the SW, a 28-foot dock directly across the waterway, and 36-foot dock which was recently approved also across the subject canal. r m m L v/ r LO r m ti co N O O O M N O N J (L M M 0 a) N 03/2023 Pn` Packet Pg. 151 Ca er County Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1036 1 Email: GMDClientServices@colliercountyfl.gov www.colliercountyfl.gov 3.B.h 8. Signs are required to be posted for all petitions. On properties that are one (1) acre or larger in size, the applicant shall be responsible for erecting the required sign. What is the size of the petitioned property? 0.19 Acres 9. Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? ❑ Yes a No (If yes, please provide copies.) I DOCK EXTENSION PRIMARY CRITERIA I The following criteria, pursuant to LDC section 5.03.06, shall be used as a guide by staff in determining its recommendation to the Office of the Hearing Examiner. The Hearing Examiner will utilize the following criteria as a guide in the decision to approve or deny a particular Dock Extension request. In order for the Hearing Examiner to approve the request, it must be determined that at least 4 of the 5 primary criteria, and at least 4 of the 6 secondary criteria, must be met. On separate sheets, please provide a narrative response to the listed criteria and/or questions. 1. Whether or not the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate in relation to the waterfront length, location, upland land use, and zoning of the subject property; consideration should be made of property on unbridged barrier islands, where vessels are the primary means of transportation to and from the property. (The number should be appropriate; typical, single-family use should be no more than two slips; typical multi -family use should be one slip per dwelling unit; in the case of unbridged barrier island docks, additional slips may be appropriate.) 2. Whether or not the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the general length, type, and draft as that described in the petitioner's application is unable to launch or moor at mean low tide (MLT). (The petitioner's application and survey should show that the water depth is too shallow to allow launch and moorine of the vessel(s) described without an extension.) 3. Whether or not the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation within an adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. (The facility should not intrude into any marked or charted navigable channel thus impeding vessel traffic in the channel.) 4. Whether or not the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25% of the width of the waterway, and whether or not a minimum of 50% of the waterway width between dock facilities on either side of the waterway is maintained for navigability. (The facility should maintain the required percentages.) 5. Whether or not the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the facility would not interfere with the use of neighboring docks. (The facility should not interfere with the use of legally permitted neighboring docks.) r m m L r as LO r 0 m ti co N O O O M N O N J d M M O Cn 03/2023 Packet Pg. 152 Co e•r County 3.B.h Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1036 1 Email: GMDClientServices@colliercountyfl.gov www.colliercountyfl.gov DOCK EXTENSION SECONDARY CRITERIA 1. Whether or not there are special conditions, not involving water depth, related to the subject property or waterway, which justify the proposed dimensions and location of the proposed dock facility. (There must be at least one special condition related to the property; these may include type of shoreline reinforcement, shoreline configuration, mangrove growth, or seagrass beds.) 2. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe, access to the vessel for loading/ unloading and routine maintenance, without the use of excessive deck area not directly related to these functions. (The facility should not use excessive deck area.) 3. For single-family dock facilities, whether or not the length of the vessel, or vessels in combination, described by the petitioner exceeds 50 percent of the subject property's linear waterfront footage.(The applicable maximum percentage should be maintained.) 4. Whether or not the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view of neighboring waterfront property owners. (The facility should not have a major impact on the view of either property owner.) 5. Whether or not seagrass beds are located within 200 feet of the proposed dock facility. (If seagrass beds are present, compliance with LDC subsection 5.03.06 J must be demonstrated.) 6. Whether or not the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of LDC subsection 5.03.06 E.11. (If applicable, compliance with subsection 5.03.06.E.11 must be demonstrated.) BOATHOUSE CRITERIA The following criteria, pursuant to LDC section 5.03.06 determining its recommendation to the decision maker. criteria as a guide in the decision to approve or deny a request to be approved, all of the criteria must be narrative response to the listed criteria and/or questions. 1. Minimum side setback requirement: Fifteen feet. F, shall be used as a guide by staff in The decision maker will utilize the following particular Boathouse request. In order for the met. On separate sheets, please provide a 2. Maximum protrusion into waterway: Twenty-five percent of canal width or 20 feet, whichever is less. The roof alone may overhang no more than 3 feet into the waterway beyond the maximum protrusion and/or side setbacks. 3. Maximum height; Fifteen feet as measured from the top of the seawall or bank, whichever is more restrictive, to the peak or highest elevation of the roof. 4. Maximum number of boathouses and covered structures per site: One. 5. All boathouses and covered structures shall be completely open on all 4 sides. 6. Roofing material and roof color shall be the same as materials and colors used on principal structure or may be a palm frond "chickee" style. A single-family dwelling unit must ve constructed on the subject lot prior to, or simultaneously with, the construction of any boathouse or covered dock structure. 7. The boathouse or covered structure must be so located as to minimize the impact on the view of the adjacent neighbors to the gratest extent practical. r m m L v/ LO 0 m ti 00 N O 0 0 M N O N J a M M 0 0 N 03/2023 Par Packet Pg. 153 Cover County Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1036 1 Email: GMDClientServices@colliercountyfl.gov www.colliercountyfl.gov ASSOCIATIONS 3.B.h Complete the following for all registered Home Owner / Civic Association(s) that could be affected by this petition and located within 1,000 feet of the subject property. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Civic Associations and Communities page on the Board of County Commissioner's website. Applicant is responsible for and shall confirm the current mailing addresses for each association as registered by the Florida Department of State, Division of Corporations. Name of Homeowner / Civic Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner / Civic Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner / Civic Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner / Civic Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner / Civic Association: Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP: City: State: ZIP: City: City: State: ZIP: State: ZIP: City: State: SIP: r m m L v/ r as LO r m ti co N O O 0 M N 0 N J a M M 0 0 N 03/2023 Pag Packet Pg. 154 Co er County Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1036 1 Email: GMDClientServices@colliercountyfl.gov www.colliercountyfl.gov Pre -Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: ❑� Dock Extension ❑✓ Boathouse Chapter 3 B. of the Administrative Code 3.B.h The following Submittal Requirement Checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting, and at time of application submittal. At time of submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted or processed. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Completed Application (download current form from County website) Property Ownership Disclosure Form ❑✓ Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized ❑✓ Competed Addressing Checklist ✓ Site plan illustration with the following: • Lot dimensions; • Required setbacks for the dock facility; • Cross section showing relation to MHW/MLW and shoreline ❑ ❑ (bank, seawall, or rip -rap revetment); • Configuration, location, and dimensions of existing and proposed facility; • Water depth where proposed dock facility is to be located; • Distance of navigable channel; • Illustration of the contour of the property; and • Illustration of dock facility from both an aerial and side view. Signed and sealed survey ❑✓ ❑ Chart of site waterway ❑ I ❑ ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: • Following the completion of the review process by County review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. • Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. r m m L v/ LO 0 m r` 00 N O O O M N O N J d M M O O N 03/2023 Packet Pg. 155 Co 'er County Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1036 1 Email: GMDClientServices@colliercountyfl.gov www.colliercountyfl.gov PLANNERS — INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: 3.B.h Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment: Executive Director Historical Review: ❑ Addressing: Parks and Recreation: fl City of Naples Planning Director ❑ School District (Residential Components): ❑ Conservancy of SWFL: ❑ Other: Emergency Management: Other: ❑ ❑ FEE REQUIREMENTS: 7 Boat Dock Extension / Boathouse Petition fee: $1,500.00 Pre -Application Meeting fee $500.00 ❑� Estimated Legal Advertising fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner: $1,125.00 ❑� If applicable, an additional fee for Property Owner Notifications will be billed to the applicant after Hearing Examiner hearing date. (Variable) ZFire Planning Review fee: $100.00 All fees are collected at the time of application. Property Notification Letters, if required by The Land Development Code, will be invoiced after the petition is heard by the Board of County Commissioners. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, 1 attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. *Additional fee for the 5th and subsequent re -submittal will be accessed at 20% of the original fee. *The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Community Development Department I GMD Portal: https://cvporta1.coiliercountyfl.gov/cityviewweb Questions? Email: GMDclientservices@colliercountyfl.gov 7gnattri'of Petiti or Agent Printed Name Z to r m m L v/ r H as LO r m ti 00 N O O O M N 0 N J d M M O O N 03/2023 'a€ Packet Pg. 156 -, CoTer County 3.B.h COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliercountvfl.gov (239) 252-2400 Assigned Planner: Pre -Application Meeting Notes Petition Type: Boat Dock Extension & Boathouse (BD) Date and Time: Wednesday 3/l/23 at 1 : 30 PM John Kelly Engineering Manager (for PPL's and FP's): Project Information Project Name: 159 Tahiti St. (BD) PL#: 20230002187 Property ID #: 52395960007 Current Zoning: RSF-4 Project Address: 159 Tahiti St. City: Naples State: FL Zip: 34113 Applicant: Jeff Rogers, Turrell Hall & Associates,Inc. Agent Name: Jeff Rogers Phone: 239-643-0166 Agent/Firm Address: 3584 Exchange Ave. City: Naples State: FL Zip: 34113 Property Owner: Peter J. & Jacqueline A. Travisano Please provide the following, if applicable: i. Total Acreage: .19 Proposed # of Residential Units: Proposed Commercial Square Footage: For Amendments, indicate the original petition number: If there is an Ordinance or Resolution associated with this project, please indicate the type and number: vi. If the project is within a Plat, provide the name and AR#/PL#: Updated 1/12/2021 Page 1 1 of 5 r m m L in LO r 0 m ti Go r N O 0 0 M N O N J a M M O CD Packet Pg. 157 3.B.h lbe' r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliercountyfl.gov (239) 252-2400 Meeting Notes As of 10/16/2017 all Zoning applications have revised applications, and your associated Application is included in your notes; additionally a *new Property Ownership Disclosure Form is required for all applications. A copy of this new form is included in your pre-app Note — link is https://www.colliercountVfl.gov/Home/ShowDocument?id=75093 Z2LIAJfj � � I // 1� ♦ 17.1 i ' � �� v � G /� If Site is within the City of Naples Water Service Area please send to Naples Utilities and Planning Departments. Then, if the petition is submitted, we are to send it (by email) to the four persons below in their Utilities and Planning Depts. - along with a request that they send us a letter or email of "no objection" to the petition. Bob Middleton RMiddleton(o)naplesgov.com Allyson Holland AMHolland(a)naplesgov.com Robin Singer RSin eq r(Dnapllesgov.com Erica Martin emartinCoDnaplesgov.com Disclaimer: Information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required data. Updated 1/12/2021 Page 1 2 of 5 Packet Pg. 158 3.B.h Pre -Application Meeting Notes GMD - Zoning Services Planner: John Kelly (239)252-5719 John.kelly@colliercouniyfl.gov ✓ Boat Dock Extension • Complete the required application; respond to each question and sign • Refer to the Final Submittal Requirement Checklist and provide/submit required documents o All submitted plans must be legible when duplicated on 8.5" X 11" standard paper o The final recording of documents is in black & white; minimize the use of color • Provide a Boundary Survey to demonstrate lot dimensions, water frontage, and riparian lines as well as the principal use of the subject property • Either as part of the application, or on a separate sheet, provide a detailed Narrative Statement fully describing the project and what is being requested • On a sheet separate from the application, please provide persuasive and convincing responses to each of the Primary and Secondary Criteria contained within LDC Section 5.03.06.H o state if each criterion has been satisfied or not satisfied o provide sufficient evidence to support any claims such as insufficient water depth, unique characteristics of the property or waterfront, width of waterway and/or canal • Site/Dock Plans o Site Plans should be measured in feet o Note that the dock facility includes any docked vessel(s); show any vessel(s) on plan o Demonstrate width of property and/or the total property water frontage o Demonstrate side and/or riparian setbacks for the dock facility o Demonstrate amount of dock protrusion using such points of measure as are contained within LDC Section 5.03.06.C.1, Measurement of Dock Protrusion o Demonstrate width of waterway (MHWL to MHWL) and the width between the most waterward point of dock facilities if a dock facility is located on the opposite shore Note that dock facilities should be minimized to allow reasonable, safe access to the vessel(s) for loading, unloading, and routine maintenance without the use of excessive deck area Boathouse • See above for general information • On a sheet separate from the application, please provide persuasive and convincing responses to each of the Boathouse Criteria contained within LDC Section 5.03.06.F o state if each criterion has been satisfied or not satisfied o provide sufficient evidence to support any claims such as insufficient water depth, unique characteristics of the property or waterfront, width of waterway and/or canal • Site Plans o Demonstrate setback requirements from property and riparian lines, demonstrate the separation from other structures on the site, Demonstrate height of boathouse and type of roof, note that the roof alone may overhang up to 3 feet into the waterway beyond the maximum protrusion and/or setback (plans must show the amount of roof overhang) �h Packet Pg. 159 3.B.h Codie-r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliercountvfl.gov (239) 252-2400 Meeting Notes �N�/�2.ON-�tt2+vTl}L. - �t(, iJna�v �A�TTi�iCh�.� /(%U7"�S Y'✓�nc Crn.�t�G �ti� ch�c,k�.►s is 5,, 3 ilE £ &aen Q� ,-,,ag Other required documentation for submittal (not listed on application): Disclaimer: Information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required data. Updated 1/12/2021 Page 1 3 of 5 Packet Pg. 160 3.B.h ThomasClarkeVEN From: BrownCraig Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2023 2:35 PM To: ThomasClarkeVEN Subject: RE: Zoning Pre-App RESEARCH for 159 Tahiti St.(BD) - PL20230002187 - Zoom meeting tomorrow Attachments: Boat Dock Extension Checklist 2016.doc -k - C-N1/I 'V c)T'¢ S Thomas, Please provide a benthic survev with an exhibit to indicate the location of seaarasses or ovster beds within 200 feet of the proposed docking facility. LDC Section 5.03.06.J Please provide a description of the shoreline and any native vegetation present. Indicate any proposed impacts to the nath shoreline vegetation (approximate area in square feet to be impacted). Please provide complete answers to Secondary Criteria #5 and #6 See LDC section 5.03.06. H.2 If lighting is proposed, please provide a description of the type and locations on the docking facility. Please provide any written authorization from any state and federal agencies if any approvals have been obtained. Please provide written acknowledgment from The Conservancy of Southwest Florida or Homeowners Association. (if located within barefoot beach Subdivision or in a platted subdivision with a CE.) The property is located adjacent to an ST Overlay zone and will need an ST permit prior to the issuance of the building perr for the docking facility. (if located within an ST Overlay) Label the name of any natural waterbody in close proximity to the proposed docking facility. (as applicable). Craig Brown Environmental Supervisor Development Review Division (239) 252-2548. From: ThomasClarkeVEN <Thomas.Clarke@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2023 4:29 PM To: StoltsAnthony <Anthony.Stolts@colliercountyfl.gov>; AshtonHeidi <Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov>; Beard Laurie <Laurie.Beard @col liercountyfl.gov>; BrownCraig <Craig.Brown @col liercountyfl.gov>; CookJaime <Jaime.Cook@colliercountyfl.gov>; CrotteauKathynell <Kathynell.Crotteau@colliercountyfl.gov>; PerryDerek <Derek.Perry@colliercountyfl.gov>; OrtmanEric <Eric.Ortman@colliercountyfl.gov>; FaulknerSue <Sue.Faulkner@colliercountyfl.gov>; SantabarbaraGino <Gino.Santabarbara@colliercountyfl.gov>; EastleyKatherine <Katherine.Eastley@colliercountyfl.gov>; MoscaMichele <Michele.Mosca@colliercountyfl.gov>; OrthRichard <Richard.Orth@colliercountyfl.gov>; KlopfParker <Parker.Klopf@colliercountyfl.gov>; HansenRachel <Rachel.Hansen @colliercountyfl.gov>; SaboJames <James.Sabo@colliercountyfl.gov>; AshkarSally <Sally.Ashkar@colliercountyfl.gov>; HarringtonSarah <Sarah.Harrington@colliercountyfl.gov>; SawyerMichael <Michael.Sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov>; Templeton Mark <Mark.Templeton@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: KellyJohn <John.Kelly@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Zoning Pre-App RESEARCH for 159 Tahiti St.(BD) - PL20230002187 - Zoom meeting tomorrow Good Afternoon All, Please see the attached Pre-App Research for 159 Tahiti St.(BD) - PL20230002187. G 3 Packet Pg. 161 3.B.h Residential Boat Dock Extension Checklist Submerged Resources Survey Checklist 1. Is there an overlay? ST overlay needs an ST permit (much of Isle of Capri & Keewaydin has an ST Overlay over the water) 2. Seagrass or seagrass beds within 200 feet of any proposed dock facility shall be identified on an aerial photograph. (LDC 5.03.06 I) Provide a submerged resources survey from an Environmental Consultant done between April and October. P530 3. All proposed dock facilities shall be located and aligned to stay at least ten feet from any existing seagrass beds, or meet restrictions for continuous beds. (LDC 5.03.06 J.) P530 4. Provide complete answers to Secondary Criteria #5 & #6. (Use Misc in CV) 5. Demonstrate how negative impacts to seagrass beds and other native shoreline vegetation and hard bottom communities have been minimized. (LDC 5.03.06 J .4) P530 6. The dock shall be field adjusted to minimize impacts to mangroves. (LDC 5.03.06 I.2) Remove this checklist item — look at LDC? P530 7. Provide a clearing plan for removal of any vegetation related to the boat dock. This is simply an information exhibit being requested. (Use Misc in CV) 8. Are there any draft restrictions? Look at the MPP. (Use Misc in CV) Keewaydin: BDE not required for Keewaydin - Most always need an ST permit related to a Building Permit— water and land have ST Overlay Seagrass: Light penetration is needed to survive, usually in more shallow areas Submerged Resources Survey: - Read thoroughly - Check location description for street & waterway (if given) - Check to see if it was uploaded to CV - Indicate in CV "Comments box" if one was done & if it was uploaded to CV * * * * * SEE SUGGESTED FORMAT OF SUBMERGED RESOURCES SURVEY ON NEXT PAGE* `�� P Packet Pg. 162 3.B.h MULTI SLIP DOCKING FACILITY • Look at supplemental criteria in 5.05.02 o Port of the Islands uses different Rating system — see MPP See 5.03.06 E 11 and 5.05.02 for Manatee awareness requirements for multi -slip docking facilities Whether the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of subsection 5.03.06(E)(11) of this LDC. (If applicable, compliance with section 5.03.06(E)(11) must be demonstrated). SUGGESTION FORMAT AND INFORMATION TO INCLUDE IN SUBMERGED RESOURCES SURVEY ➢ Location of survey — property address and folio# o The survey shall indicate any seagrass or seagrass beds located within 200 feet on any proposed dock facility (5.03.06.J). In order for this to be accomplished, any within 200 feet of the proposed dock (within the riparian lines of the property and adjacent to the property) shall be surveyed. ➢ Who did the survey — which firm and their contact information including name, address, phone #, email ➢ What date was the survey conducted? Guidance from FWC is to do between April and October o Weather conditions, water temperature, low tide & high tide times ➢ Objective of Survey & Work done on the site o Was the site snorkeled? o What methodologies were used? o Was a GPS used? o Was an aerial photograph reviewed and used to establish survey transect lines? ➢ Results o What was found? Substrate and what kind? Seagrass, shell, oysters? o What was along the shoreline? Mangroves, seawall, etc? o Why does the consultant think no submerged resources were found? o Other observations ➢ When seagrass is found, include all requirements of LDC section 5.03.06. J. ➢ Conclusions o Were any submerged resources found? If yes, what? o Are any impacts to submerged resources expected or proposed? ➢ Pictures (suggested angles) o Looking toward and away from the shoreline o The proposed location of the boat access o Observations in the water - Any oyster debris, shell, seagrass 5.03.06. J. (LDC section up to date as of 2016) Protection of seagrass beds. Seagrass or seagrass beds within 200 feet of any proposed docks, dock facilities, or boathouses shall be protected through the following standards: 1. Where new docking facilities or boat dock extensions are proposed, the location and presence of seagrass or seagrass beds within 200 feet of any proposed dock facility shall be identified on an aerial photograph having a scale of 1 inch to 200 feet when available from the County, or a scale of 1 inch to 400 feet when such photographs are not available from the County. The location of seagrass beds shall be verified by the County Manager or designee prior to issuance of any project approval or permit. 2. All proposed dock facilities shall be located and aligned to stay at least 10 feet from any existing seagrass beds, except where a continuous bed of seagrasses exists off the shore of the property and adjacent to the property, and to minimize negative impacts to seagrasses and other native shoreline, emergent and submerged vegetation, and hard bottom communities. a� L co M CD W c m ti 00 N 0 0 0 M N 0 N J a M M O CD N Packet Pg. 163 3.B.h 3. Where a continuous bed of seagrasses exists off the shore of the property and adjacent to the property, the applicant shall be allowed to build a dock across the seagrass beds, or a docking facility within 10 feet of seagrass beds. Such docking facilities shall comply with the following conditions: a. The dock shall be at a height of at least 3.5 feet NGVD. b. The terminal platform area of the dock shall not exceed 160 square feet. CO c. The access dock shall not exceed a width of 4 feet. _ d. The access dock and terminal platform shall be sited to impact the smallest area of seagrass beds possible. M 4. The petitioner shall be required to demonstrate how negative impacts to seagrass beds and other native shoreline vegetation and hard bottom communities have been minimized prior to any project approval or permit o issuance. m ti 00 N O O O M N O N J d �� Packet Pg. 164 "3 a� Go -Mier County v X�\ "11 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliercountyfl.gov (239) 252-2400 Pre -Application Meeting Sign -in Sheet PL# 20230002187 Collier County Contact Information: 3.B.h Name Review Discipline Phone Email ❑ Maggie Acevedo North Collier Fire 252-2309 macevedo@northcollierfire.com ❑ Steve Baluch Transportation Planning 252-2361 stephen.baluch@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Shar A.Beddow MSM/Deputy Fire Marshal - Greater Naples Fire 241-1422 sbeddow@gnfire.org ❑ Ray Bellows Zoning, Planning Manager 252-2463 raymond.bellows@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Laurie Beard PUD Monitoring 252-5782 laurie.beard@colliercountyfl.gov Craig Brown Environmental Specialist 252-2548 craig.brown@colliercountyfl.gov El Heidi Ashton Cicko Managing Asst. County Attorney 252-8773 heidi.ashton@colliercountyfl.gov Lk_' Thomas Clarke Zoning Operations Analyst 252-2584 thomas.clarke@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jamie Cook Development Review Director 252-6290 Jaime.cook@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Gabriela Castro Zoning Principal Planner 252-4211 gabriela.castro@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Maggie DeMeo North Collier Fire 252-2308 pdemeo@northcollierfire.com ❑ Eric Fey, P.E. Utility Planning 252-1037 eric.fey@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Tim Finn, AICP Zoning Principal Planner 252-4312 timothy.finn @colliercountyfLgov ❑ Sue Faulkner GMP - Comprehensive Planning 252-5715 sue.faulkner@colliercountyfl.gov �I Michael Gibbons Structural/Residential Plan Review 252-2426 michael.gibbons@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Storm Gewirtz, P.E. Engineering Stormwater 252-2434 storm.gewirtz@colliercountyfl.gov 1 Cormac Giblin, AICP Development Review -Planning Manager 252-5095 Cormac.giblin@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Nancy Gundlach, AICP Zoning Principal Planner 252-2484 nancy.gundlach@colliercountyfl.gov Rachel Hansen GMP— Comprehensive Planning 252-1142 Rachel. hansen@colliercountyfLgov ❑ Richard Henderlong Zoning Principal Planner 252-2464 richard.henderlong@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ John Houldsworth Engineering Subdivision 252-5757 john.houldsworth@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Alicia Humphries Right -Of -Way Permitting 252-2326 alicia.humphries@colliercountyfl.gov Anita Jenkins Planning & Zoning Director 252-5095 Anita.jenkins@colliercountyfl.gov John Kelly Zoning Senior Planner 252-5719 john.kelly@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Parker Klopf GMP— Comprehensive Planning 252-2471 Parker.klopf@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Troy Komarowski North Collier Fire 252-2521 tkomarowski@northcollierfire.com ❑ Sean Lintz North Collier Fire 597-9227 slintz@northcollierfire.com F1 Diane Lynch Operations Analyst 252-8243 diane.lynch@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Thomas Mastroberto Greater Naples Fire 252-7348 thomas.mastroberto@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jack McKenna, P.E. Engineering Services 252-2911 jack. mckenna@colIiercountyfLgov Updated 1/12/2021 Page 1 4 of 5 Packet Pg. 165 3.B.h C0Mer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliercountyfl.gov (239) 252-2400 ❑ Matt McLean, P.E. Division Director - IF, CPP & PM 252-8279 matthew.mclean@colliercountyfl.gov I I Michele Mosca, AICP Capital Project Planning 252-2466 michele.mosca@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Richard Orth Stormwater Planning 252-5092 richard.orth@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Eric Ortman Zoning Principal Planner 252-1032 Eric. Ortman@colIiercountyfLgov ❑ Derek Perry Assistant County Attorney 252-8066 Derek. perry@colIiercountyfLgov ❑ Brandi Pollard Utility Impact fees 252-6237 bra ndi.pollard@colliercountyfLgov ❑ Todd Riggall North Collier Fire 597-9227 triggall@northcollierfire.com ❑ Brett Rosenblum, P.E. Development Review Principal Project Manager 252-2905 brett.rosenblum@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ James Sabo, AICP GMP, Comp Planning Manager 252-2708 james.sabo@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Michael Sawyer Transportation Planning 252-2926 michael.sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Corby Schmidt, AICP Comprehensive Planning 252-2944 corby.schmidt@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Linda Simmons North Collier Fire 252-2311 Linda.Simmons@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Peter Shawinsky Architectural Review 252-8523 peter.shawinsky@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Mark Templeton Landscape Review 252-2475 mark.templeton@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Connie Thomas Client Services Supervisor 252-6369 Consuela.thomas@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jessica Velasco Client Services 252-2584 jessica.velasco@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jon Walsh, P.E. Building Review 252-2962 jonathan.walsh@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Kirsten Wilkie Environmental Review Manager 252-5518 kirsten.wilkie@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Christine Willoughby Development Review -Zoning 1 252-5748 christine.willoughby@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Daniel Zunzunegui North Collier Fire 1 252-2310 1 Daniel.Zunzunegui@colliercountyfl.gov Additional Attendee Contact Information: Name Representing Phone Email 3aFF 12oG T' ccL etc c' hoc. 2-?q -c,1 -old Updated 1/12/2021 Page 1 5 of 5 Packet Pg. 166 3.B.h Applicant/Agent may also send site plans or conceptual plans for review in advance if desired. PL20230002187 - 159 Tahiti St. (BD) Planner: John Kelly Assigned Ops Staff: Thomas Clarke m r STAFF FORM FOR SUPPLEMENTAL PRE -APPLICATION MEETING INFORMATION I~ CD • Name and Number of who submitted pre-app request "' 0 m Jeff Rogers —Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. 00 239-643-0166 N Jeff@thanaples.com o M N O N J • Agent to list for PL# a M M O Jeff Rogers — Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. N • Owner of property (all owners for all parcels) Peter J. & Jacqueline A. Travisano • Confirm Purpose of Pre-App: Boat Dock Extension and Boathouse • Please list the density request of the project if applicable and number of homes/units/offices/docks (any that apply N/A • Details about Project: Boat dock extension and boathouse. REQUIRED Supplemental Information provided by: Name: Title: Email: Phone: Cancellation/Reschedule Requests: Contact Connie Thomas- Supervisor — Permitting Consuela.thomas@colliercountyfl.gov - Phone: 239-252-2473 Created April 5, 2017 Location: K:\CDES Planning Services\Current\Zoning Staff Information Packet Pg. 167 Coiner County Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1036 1 Email: GMDClientServices@colliercountyfl.gov www.colliercountyfl.gov Pre -Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: © Dock Extension 2 Boathouse Chapter 3 B. of the Administrative Code 3.B.h The following Submittal Requirement Checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting, and at time of application submittal. At time of submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted or processed. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Completed Application (download current form from County website) ✓ Property Ownership Disclosure Form ✓❑ Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized ✓❑ Completed Addressing Checklist Site plan illustration with the following: • Lot dimensions; • Required setbacks for the dock facility; • Cross section showing relation to MHW/MLW and shoreline E ❑ (bank, seawall, or rip -rap revetment); • Configuration, location, and dimensions of existing and proposed facility; • Water depth where proposed dock facility is to be located; • Distance of navigable channel; • Illustration of the contour of the property; and • Illustration of dock facility from both an aerial and side view. Signed and sealed survey 21 ❑ Chart of site waterway ❑ E ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: • Following the completion of the review process by County review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. • Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. m a� L r N Y rn LO 0 m 00 N Co 0 0 M N 0 N J a M M 0 CD N 08/2022 Pa Packet Pg. 168 (fleTC014ftty Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1036 ( Email: GMDClientServices@colliercountyfl.gov www.colliercountyfl.gov PLANNERS — INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: 3.B.h Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment: Executive Director Historical Review: ❑ Addressing: Parks and Recreation: ❑ City of Naples Planning Director ❑ School District (Residential Components): ❑ Conservancy of SWFL: ❑ Other: Emergency Management: Other: ❑ ❑ FEE REQUIREMENTS: ❑✓ Boat Dock Extension / Boathouse Petition fee: $1,500.00 �✓ Pre -Application Meeting fee $500.00 Estimated Legal Advertising fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner: $1,125.00 ❑� If applicable, an additional fee for Property Owner Notifications will be billed to the applicant after Hearing Examiner hearing date. (Variable) Fire Planning Review fee: $100.00 All fees are collected at the time of application. Property Notification Letters, if required by The Land Development Code, will be invoiced after the petition is heard by the Board of County Commissioners. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. *Additional fee for the 5th and subsequent re -submittal will be accessed at 20% of the original fee. *The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Community Development Department I GMD Portal: https://cvportal.colliercountyfl.gov/cityviewweb Questions? Email: GMDclientservices@colliercountyfl.gov Signature of Petitioner or Agent Printed Name Date m ;v H rn LO r m ti 00 r N O O O M N 0 N J IL M M O CD Zl. 08/2022 Pa Packet Pg. 169 3.B.h co ver County Growth Management Community Development Department ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following and upload via the CityView Portal with your submittal. Items marked with (*) are required for every application, other items are optional and may not apply to every project. Forms are valid for 6 months following their submittal; an updated form will be required for a new submittal after that timeframe and any time the properties within the project boundary are modified. Additional documents may be attached to this form and can include: - * LOCATION MAP and/or SURVEY showing the proposed project boundary. - List of additional folio numbers and associated legal descriptions. - E-mail from Addressing Official for any pre -approved project and/or street names. LOCATION INFORMATION *FOLIO (Property ID) Number(s) of subject property or properties. [Attach list if necessary] 52395960007 *LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties. [Attach list if necessary] ISLES OF CAPRI NO 2 LOT 285 STREET ADDRESS(ES) where applicable, if already assigned. 159 Tahiti St. Naples, FL 34102 PROJECT INFORMATION Acceptance of this form does not constitute project and/or street name approval and is subject to further review by the Addressing Official. Pre -Approval may be requested by contacting us at GMD_Add ressing@colliercountyfLgov or 239-252-2482 prior to your submittal. CURRENT PROJECT NAME PROPOSED PROJECT NAME PROPOSED STREET NAME(s) LATEST APPROVED PROJECT NUMBER [e.g., SDP-94-##, PPL-2002-AR-####, PL2017000####] Addressing Checklist (Rev 10/2022) Page 1 of 1 Operations & Regulatory Management Division • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 • 239-252-2400 www. col I ie rco u ntyfl. qov Packet Pg. 170 3.B.h 1 :m-lyApa., fs� r :M1 r MAP LEGEND Vapor Road& Street Names EJ Parcels y Aerials 202-2 Ufoan [VNI Aerials 2022 Rural 12FT] Golller County " ,,,,r ; Folio Number: 52395960007 qfA '�' Name: TRAVISANO. PETER J Street# 8, Name: 159 TAHM ST r Build# I Unit#: ' 285 �' ` � r"• Legal Description: ISLES 4F CRPRI NO 2 LOT 285 u r Attachment: Attachment G - Applicant's Backup, Application and Supporting Documents1 (29033 : PL20230002187 BD 159 Tahiti Street rr � C orri e* r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: C Name and Address % of Ownership Peter J Travisano 10817 Garden Ridge Ct. Davie, FL 33328 50 Jacqueline A Travisano 10817 Garden Ridge Ct. Davie, FL 33328 50 If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address I % of Ownership If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest: Name and Address I % of Ownership Created 9/28/2017 Page 1 of 3 Packet Pg. 172 C o i e* r County 3.B.h COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners: e f [* Name and Address I % of Ownership If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the 'I IIut=I J, JLUL.RI IUIUIn J, UCI ICI IL.IQI ICJ, UI PCII LI ICI J. Name and Address % of Ownership Date of Contract: If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust: Date subject property acquired ❑ Leased: Term of lease Name and Address years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Created 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 3 Packet Pg. 173 C o i e* r County 3.B.h COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Date of option: Date option terminates: or Anticipated closing date: AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form. Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest -holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition's final public hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to Growth Management Department ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 3/30/2023 Agent/Owner Signature Date Jeff Rogers Agent/Owner Name (please print) Created 9/28/2017 Page 3 of 3 Packet Pg. 174 3.B.h AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PL20230DO2187 I, � T --' -V-A-AS4'`t10 (print name), as (title, if applicable) of TAr�-HTt S r (company, If applicable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner applicant contract purchaser and that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. Well authorize Jeff Rogers - Turrell, Hall E, Associates. Inc. to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. *Notes: . If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. Ares. or v. pres. . If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner" of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee". • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that th7:ta teit are true. � f / Signature Date STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was acknowleged before me by means of 0physical presence or ❑online notarization this 1.5 day of N.-R-.. , 20z r by (printed name of owner or qualifier) Such person(s) Notary Public must check applicable box: 0 Are personally known to me ❑ Has produced a current drivers license ❑ Has produced Notary Signature: CL-1 M08-COA-0411511 ss REV 3/4/2020 as identification. =St&tBe of Florida es JoyceG 3osG573 Packet Pg. 175 3.B.h AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PL20230002187 4 • TP—Avt`}A c (print name), as (title, if applicable) of L FA-t+-t-r-I 3-r ' c—LLJCil - (company, If applicable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner applicant=contract purchaser=and that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approvals) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. Well authorize Jeff Rogers-Turreii, Hall a Associates, Inc to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. *Notes: e If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the carp. pres. or v. pres. If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member. " • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner" of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust then they must include the trustees name and the words "as trustee" • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under pe Ities of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts "fated in it are true �7 7 l Signature Date STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was acknowleged before me by means of [0physical presence or ❑online notarization this day of i 2QL� by (printed name of owner or qualifier) Such persons) Notary Public must check applicable box: © Are personally known to me 0 Has produced a current drivers license Q Has produced Notary Signature: CP108-COA-001151155 REV 3/4/2020 as identification. a llotary Pvbfic State of Florida Christopher James Joyce MY Commission GG 306857 Expires 06125f2023 Packet Pg. 176 W irefox https://www.collierapprai,er.conVrnain search/recorddetail.html?sid=&Map=No&FotioN... Copier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Parcel No 52395960007 Site Address 159 TAHITI ST Site City NAPLES *Disclaimer Name / Address TRAVISANO, PETER J JACQUELINE A TRAVISANO 10817 GARDEN RIDGE CT City DAVIE Map No. Strap No. 61332 426700 28561332 Legal ISLES OF CAPRI NO 2 LOT 285 Millage Area O 91 Sub./Condo 426700 - ISLES OF CAPRI UNIT 2 Use Code O 7 - Miscellaneous Residential State FL Section Township 32 51 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book -Page Amount 03/01/22 6097-1605 $ 1,800,000 04/28/21 5956-1806 $ 975,000 02/19/18 5480-3217 $ 800,000 03/26/99 2527-3098 $ 290,000 06/01/88 1356-137 $ 175,000 12/01/75 637-1496 $ 0 Site Zone *Note 34113 Zip 33328 Range Acres *Estimated 26 0.19 it age Raigs • 'Calculations School Other Total 4.459 6.5042 10.9632 2022 Certified Tax Roil (Subject to Change) Land Value $ 1,179,387 (+} Improved Value $ 17,457 (_} Market Value $ 1,196,844 (_} Assessed Value $ 1,196,844 (_} School Taxable Value $ 1,196,844 (�} Taxable Value $ 1,196,844 If all Values shown above equal o this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Elk I of 1 Attachment: Attachment G - Applicant's Backup, Application and Supporting Documents1 (29033 : PL20230002187 BD 159 Tahiti Street 17 pkt 3.B.h Narrative Description: The proposed Boat Dock Extension and Boathouse request is to basically rebuild an existing docking facility that was originally constructed prior to 1985. The subject dock and boathouse are for a single-family residential property with one boatlift located at 159 Tahiti St on Isles of Capri. The subject waterway is man-made and considered to be part of Tarpon Bay along the south side of Isles of Capri. The subject property has a seawall which is also where the property line is located as well as the Mean high-water line (MHWL) therefore is also considered the most restrictive point. The applicant is currently working on plans to construct a new single-family residence. The proposed dock requires a BDE as the dock and boathouse are proposed to increase in size as well as protrusion to accommodate the applicant's vessel on a boatlift. The remaining portion of the dock will remain exactly the way it is currently which also meets and exceeds the required side yard setback requirement. As proposed the dock will have one boatlift under the proposed boathouse to service a 26-foot vessel and the overall dock protrusion will be approximately 30-feet from the property line and the boathouse roof will overhang as allowed 1.5-feet further out. Therefore, the applicant is requesting a 10-foot extension over the allowed 20-feet into a waterway that is approximately 149-feet wide. Based off that the dock and boathouse as proposed would protrude approximately 21% into the subject waterway. The subject waterway is an unmarked waterway, but Tarpon Bay does have a marked channel which the proposed dock is immediately adjacent to. As proposed the dock and boathouse is consistent with others on the subject waterway and the ingress/egress to the proposed dock will not interfere with navigation within the waterway nor to any of the immediate adjacent docks. The proposed dock will provide 34-foot and 28-foot setbacks which is greater than what is required for lots with 60-feet of shoreline or greater being 15-feet. There is no impact to any submerged resources, the newly proposed decking area has been minimized and the remaining area is to be replaced within the existing footprint. The entire dock area allows for recreational activities, associated storage, and lay along mooring without protruding any further out. There are numerous other existing docking facilities on the subject waterway and as proposed the dock is consistent with the other existing surrounding docks. This can be seen on the attached BDE exhibits as a reference for your review. Packet Pg. 178 3.B.h Primary Criteria Whether or not the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate in relation to the waterfront length, location, upland land use, and zoning of the subject property; consideration should be made of property on unbridged barrier islands, where vessels are the primary means of transportation to and from the property. (The number should be appropriate; typical, single-family use should be no more than two slips; typical multi -family use should be one slip per dwelling unit; in the case of unbridged barrier island docks, additional slips may be appropriate.) The subject property is zoned for a single-family residential unit which warrants no more than 2 slips per the CC-LDC and the Collier County Manatee Protection Plan. The proposed docking facility consists of installing one boatlift and boathouse to accommodate a 26-foot LOA vessel. The proposed dock will extend out 30-feet from the platted property line which is 10-feet of protrusion past from the allowed 20-feet. Additionally, the proposed dock will provide 26.6-foot and 29.6-foot setbacks from both riparian lines and therefore will not interfere with the adjacent properties as the vessel ingress/egress the proposed boatlift. Criterion Met 2. Whether or not the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the general length, type, and draft as that described in the petitioner's application is unable to launch or moor at mean low tide (MLT). (The petitioner's application and survey should show that the water depth is too shallow to allow launch and mooring of the vessel (s) described without an extension.) The proposed boat dock project is to basically replace the existing docking facility onsite but increase the overall boathouse size and associated finger -piers to accommodate the applicant's vessel. There is riprap along the entire subject property shoreline except for within the boathouse slip as indicated on the attached certified survey. Additionally, the survey has water depths which indicate that depths are sufficient on -site and therefore this criterion is no met. 3. Whether or not the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation within an adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. (The facility should not intrude into any marked or charted navigable channel thus impeding vessel traffic in the channel.) The proposed docking facility design is consistent with what is there today and been in place prior to 1985. The dock is consistent with numerous other docks along the subject and adjacent waterways as well as the overall protrusion. As proposed the dock and boathouse will not impact navigation as well as maintain the ingress/egress to both adjacent neighboring docks. There is no marked channel within this section of Tarpon Bay and as a result there will not be any impacts to the existing navigation as a result from the proposed project. Criterion Met Packet Pg. 179 3.B.h 4. Whether or not the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25 percent of the width of the waterway, and whether or not a minimum of 50 percent of the waterway width between dock facilities on either side of the waterway is maintained for navigability. (The facility should maintain the required percentages.) The approximate waterway width is 149-feet wide. The proposed dock protrusion is 30-feet which is approximately 21% width of the waterway. Criterion Met 5. Whether or not the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the facility would not interfere with the use of neighboring docks. (The facility should not interfere with the use of legally permitted neighboring docks.) The proposed docking facility is consistent with the existing dock on -site and the other neighboring docks which accommodate larger vessels. As proposed the dock will be within the allowed buildable area by providing the required setbacks and therefore the views into the subject waterway by the adjacent property owners will not be impacted nor their access to their docks. Criterion Met Packet Pg. 180 3.B.h Secondary Criteria Whether or not there are special conditions, not involving water depth, related to the subject property or waterway, which justify the proposed dimensions and location of the proposed dock facility. (There must be at least one special condition related to the property; these may include type of shoreline reinforcement, shoreline configuration, mangrove growth, or seagrass beds.) The subject property shoreline consists of a concrete seawall with rip -rap along the entire 154-linear feet except for the boathouse slip. The proposed dock is basically a reconstruction of what is there today other than modernizing the boathouse and associated finger piers to accommodate the applicant's vessel. Additionally, the width of waterway and the fact the entire waterway is open for navigation allows for a dock to protrude out which is consistent with ours within the subject waterway. Criterion Met 2. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe, access to the vessel for loading/unloading and routine maintenance, without the use of excessive deck area not directly related to these functions. (The facility should not use excessive deck area.) The proposed docking facility has been fully minimized and still provides deck area for routine maintenance, safe access as well as recreational activities like fishing. The total over -water square footage is 1254 square feet which is only an increase of 59 square feet from what is there today. Criterion Met 3. For single-family dock facilities, whether or not the length of the vessel, or vessels in combination, described by the petitioner exceeds 50 percent of the subject property's linear waterfront footage. (The applicable maximum percentage should be maintained.) The docking facility has been designed to moor one vessel 26-feet in length and with the existing shoreline length being approximately 134.4-feet we are less than 50%. Criterion Met 4. Whether or not the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view of neighboring waterfront property owners. (The facility should not have a major impact on the view of either property owner.) As proposed the dock has been designed within the designated setbacks and is consistent with the existing docking facility that is there current and has been there prior to 1985. There are no impacts to either adjacent property owner as their view will not change as the proposed overall facility is consistent with that is there today. Criterion Met Packet Pg. 181 3.B.h 5. Whether or not seagrass beds are located within 200 feet of the proposed dock facility. (If seagrass beds are present, compliance with LDC subsection 5.03.06 I must be demonstrated.) There are no seagrass beds present on the property nor the neighboring properties within 200' of the existing dock structure. Criterion Met 6. Whether or not the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of LDC subsection 5.03.06 E.11. (If applicable, compliance with subsection 5.03.06.E.11 must be demonstrated.) The proposed work is a single-family dock facility and therefore not subject to Manatee Protection Requirements. Criterion Met Packet Pg. 182 3.B.h Boathouse Criteria LDC Section 5.03.06(F) 1. Minimum side setback requirement: Fifteen feet. As proposed the dock will provide a 26.6-foot setback and a 29.6-foot setback. Therefore, this criterion is met. 2. Maximum protrusion into waterway: Twenty-five percent of canal width or 20 feet, whichever is less. The roof alone may overhang no more than 3 feet into the waterway beyond the maximum protrusion and/or side setbacks. Please see attached exhibits, the cross-section view verifying the proposed boathouse roof will extend out into the waterway no more than 31.5-feet from the property line, which is less than 25% width of the subject waterway. As proposed the dock will extend out 30-feet and the boathouse roof will extend approximately 1.5-feet further out which is allowed per the LDC boathouse criteria. 3. Maximum height: Fifteen feet as measured from the top of the seawall or bank, whichever is more restrictive, to the peak or highest elevation of the roof. Please see attached exhibits indicating the proposed boathouse roof will be 15-feet above the top of dock. 4. Maximum number of boathouses or covered structures per site: One. This criterion is met. 5. All boathouses and covered structures shall be completely open on all 4 sides. This criterion is met. 6. Roofing material and roof color shall be the same as materials and colors used on the principal structure or may be of a palm frond "chickee" style. A single-family dwelling unit must be constructed on the subject lot prior to, or simultaneously with, the construction of any boathouse or covered dock structure. The proposed roofing material will match the upland principal structure therefore this criterion is met. 7. The boathouse or covered structure must be so located as to minimize the impact on the view of the adjacent neighbors to the greatest extent practical. The boathouse is located within the required side yard setbacks and is consistent with other existing previously approved boathouses on the subject waterway. Packet Pg. 183 STATE OF FLOFRI DA CITY TAM PA FT.MYE0 APL S D' O KEY WEST COLLIER COUNTY Iva SUBJECT PROPERTY SITE ADDRESS: <> 159 TAHITI ST <> LATITUDE: N 25.978706 NAPLES, FL 34113 <> LONGITUDE: W-81.727889 NOTES: <> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. VICINITY MAP COUNTY AERIAL DESIGNED: IJR 11, 1 RMJ 05-11-23 1 JR I SHEETS 3-6,09 TUl'1'ell, Hall &Associates, Inc. —1 S J TA H 1 T 1 S T DRAWN BY: RMJ 2 RMJ 07-18-23 JR SHEETS O4-07, 10 Marine & Environmental Consulting CREATED 03-29-23 3, JOB NO.: 123004.00 4, 3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732 LOCATION MAP SHEET NO: 01 OF 10 5 Email: -• _ „__ E Attachment: Attachment G - Applicant's Backup, Application and Supporting Documents1 (29033 : PL20230002187 BD 159 Tahiti Street - SUBJECT — PROPERTY jet Q EXISTING SEAWALL N s 0 20 40 8a SCALE 9N CEE7 EXISTING BOATHOUSE EXISTING DOCK DESIGNED: IJR 1 Turlell, Hall &Associates, Inc. —1 S J TA H 1 T 1 S T DRAWN BY Marine & Environmental Consulting CREATED: 03-29-23 3. JOB NO.: 23004.00 4. 3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732 1985 AERIAL SHEET NO.: 02OF 10 B. _ _ _ _ mail:.....-�......�� ° ... ....... .... E Attachment: Attachment G - Applicant's Backup, Application and Supporting Documents1 (29033 : PL20230002187 BD 159 Tahiti Street m x 4 z z c1 O 0 z 0 0 z �o 0 A i SUBJECT PROPERTY W SITE ADDRESS: NAPLES, FL 34113 i T' � \\ Y \ v _m C MANGROVES 0PFZ�P EXISTING ?9 i 7 MOORING PILE MLW E s 0 30 60 JCA('Z 9N77EE7 EXISTING BOATHOUSE AND BOAT LIFT TO BE +,s3� REBUILT MLW MHW/MLW MOSTLY ABUTS ►1/ ~/ 8. THE FACE OF THE SEAWALL r .0 EXISTING FIXED DOCK / TO BE REBUILT EXISTING `y o RIPRAP ®R I EXISTING SEAWALL NOTES: • THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. • ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW • SURVEY COURTESY OF: "COURT GREGORY SURVEYING, INC." • SURVEY DATED: 01.25-23 • APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF): 134.4' • EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF): 1195 • WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX): 149' • TIDAL DATUM: •• MHW (NAND)= -0.35' MLW (NAND)- -1.66, DESIGNED: IJR Il. I RMJ 05-11-23 1 JR I ADDED SETBACKS Turlell, Hall & Associates, Inc. —1 S J TA H 1 T 1 S T DRAWN BY: RMJ 2 Marine & Environmental Consulting CREATED: 03-29-23 3. JOB NO.: 23004.00 4. - - - - 3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732 EXISTING CONDITIONS SHEET NO.: 03 OF 10 5. - Email:...- - ., ,, ..., E Attachment: Attachment G - Applicant's Backup, Application and Supporting Documents1 (29033 : PL20230002187 BD 159 Tahiti Street PROPOSED 0 12'X12' z 13K BOATLIFT RIPARIAN LINE AA 05 26 6 0 EXISTING PILE TO BE Z REMOVED N a s w � = D� PROPOSED BOATHOUSE (28'X15') PROPOSED 3 FIXED DOCK 1 1 56' cn d MANGROVES TO REMAIN SUBJECT PROPERTY PROPOSED SEAWALL PILE COUNT TYPE SIZE QUANTITY DOCK PILE 10" 27 BOAT LIFT PILE 12" 4 BOATHOUSE PILE 12" 4 FJ tit 0 1 10 20 40 JCA 9N'FEE7 PROPOSED HAND RAILING REFURBISHED RIPRAP RIPARIAN LINE NOTES: THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW SURVEY COURTESY OF: "COURT GREGORY SURVEYING, INC." •• SURVEY DATED: 01-25-23 APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF): 134.4' EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF): 1195 WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX): 149' TIDAL DATUM: •• MHW (NAVD)- +0.35' •• MLW (NAVD)- -1.66' PROPOSED OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF): 1254 TOTAL OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF): 1254 TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM PROPERTY LINE: 30' ' Inc,DESIGNED: JR 1c n RMJ 05f11-23 c�JRlly cREVGSETBACKS:%VO%%. ADDED RAIL AND VESS /\\J Turrell, Hall & Associates, In—1 S c� TA " 1 T 1 S T DRAWN BY: RMJ 2, RMJ 07-18-23 JR REV. PROTRUSION DIMENSION Marine & Environmental Consulting CREATED 23004,0 3. JOB NO.: 23004.00 4. 3584Exchange Ave. Naples, FL34104-3732 PROPOSED DOCK - DIMENSIONS SHEET NO. 04OF10 5 Email:, __ ..._ ... __ ......__ E Attachment: Attachment G - Applicant's Backup, Application and Supporting Documents1 (29033 : PL20230002187 BD 159 Tahiti Street — PROPOSED — BOATHOUSE PROPOSED 13K BOATLIFT RIPARIAN LINE O \. 11 PROPOSED HAND RAILING CO �J id C N CID' MANGROVES 0000 SUBJECT PROPERTY PROPOSED FIXED DOCK MQ) J cb — PROPOSED ti SEAWALL �t C-' �Ix 0 10 20 40 NEL— SCALE9N CEE7 PROPOSED HAND RAILING REFURBISHED ^ry. RIPRAP \L ,V RIPARIAN n, LINE } I � NOTES: THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW SURVEY COURTESY OF: "COURT GREGORY SURVEYING, INC." • SURVEY DATED: 01.25.23 • APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF): 134.4' EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF): 1195 WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX): 149' TIDAL DATUM: •• MHW (NAVD)= +0.35' / •• MLW (NAVD)= -1.66' • PROPOSED OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF): 1254 • TOTAL OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF): 1254 • TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM PROPERTY LINE: 30' DESIGNED: JR 1E11RMJ 05f11-23 c"JR cTURNED ON ROOF, ADDED RAIL,W Turrell, Hall &Associates, Inc. —1 S J TA H 1 T 1 T DRAWN BY RMJ 2 RMJ 07-18-23 JR REV PROTRUSION DIMENSION P�� Marine &Environmental Consulting CREATED: 03-29-23 3. JOB NO.: 23004.00 4. - - - - 3584Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732 PROPOSED DOCK - DEPTHS SHEET NO.: -OF 10 5. Email:. _ _. ..11 1-1 11. 11 Attachment: Attachment G - Applicant's Backup, Application and Supporting Documents1 (29033 : PL20230002187 BD 159 Tahiti Street — —11.5, CAP TIMBER (TYP) MHW = +0.35' NAVD 88 MLW = -1.66' NAVD 88 30' PROTRUSION FROM PROPERTY LINE 26' 12' BOATLIFT ALL PILINGS TO BE WRAPPED FROM 12" ABOVE MHW TO 6" BELOW SUBSTRATE PROPOSED ROOF (ROOF WILL BE SAME TYPE AND COLOR AS THE PRINCIPLE STRUCTURE) DECKING STRINGER (TYP) REFURBISHED RIPRAP i 1.5' I~ ROOF PILES (TYP) PROPOSED SEAWALL 0 2 g ra SCALE 9N CEET Turrell, Hall &Associates, I11C. DESIGNED R RMJ 05-11-23 JR ADDED NOTE, OVERHANG DIM. TA H 1 T 1 S T DRAWN BY: RMJ 2. RMJ 07-18-23 TH REV. PROTRUSION DIMENSION Marine &Environmental Consulting CREATED: 03-29-23 3. JOB NO.: 23004.00 4. 3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732 CROSS SECTION AA SHEET NO.: 06 OF 10 5. _ _ _ _ mail:._ __.._-----"- ----- . ,. ,, . E — Attachment: Attachment G - Applicant's Backup, Application and Supporting Documents1 (29033 : PL20230002187 BD 159 Tahiti Street L % h.. , 3` r Y. look 41 o y/ ra ; /1 a RECENTLY�w,l'. ..� APPROVED Y v DE i ` PIlk PROPOSED FIXED DOCK r NOTE: o ga too 200 THE DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE AND ARE TAKEN FROM THE AERIAL IMAGE. SCAc'Z N�EEr N' TulTell, Hall &Associates, Inc, DESIGNED JR RRMJ DATE 07-18-23 c JR cREVE PROTRUSION DIMENSION 1--1 ' T' T DREATED. RMJ 2. Marine & Environmental Consulting CREATED JOB NO.: 03-29-23 23004,00 3 4. 3584Exchange Ave. Naples,FL34104-3732 ADJACENT DOCKS s EETNo: o7oR,o s ma{:, ... .. e Attachment: Attachment G - Applicant's Backup, Application and Supporting Documents1 (29033 : PL20230002187 BD 159 Tahiti Street N A TYPICAL DIVE TRANSECT t. s.� w 1 Ir PROPERTY 4; + �R 200, t T• 0 30 60 920 TRANSECTS (TYP) NO SEAGRASSES WERE OBSERVED GROWING WITHIN 200 FT OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT N NOTES: THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. SURVEY COURTESY OF: "COURT GREGORY SURVEYING, INC." SURVEY DATED: 01-25-23 Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. DESIGNED R ; °° 5 TA H 1 T 1 S T DRAWNBY: MJ 2. Marine & Environmental Consulting CREATED 03-29-23 3. g P SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY SHEETJOB 08 OF 10 4 3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732 SHEET NO: OS OF 10 s _ Email:, __ ..._ ... __ ......__ E Attachment: Attachment G - Applicant's Backup, Application and Supporting Documents1 (29033 : PL20230002187 BD 159 Tahiti Street — z 0 30 6o 20 SCALE 9N �EE7 PROPOSED FIXED DOCK NOTE: THE DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE AND ARE TAKEN FROM THE AERIAL IMAGE. DESIGNED: JR 1, RMJ 05-11-23 JR REV. WIDTH OF WATERWAY Turrell, Hall &Associates, Inc. —1 S TA H 1 T 1 T DRAWN BY RMJ 2 RMJ 07-18-23 RMJ ADDED DIMENSION Marine &Environmental Consulting JOECREATED: 03-29-23 3. WIDTH OF WATERWAY SHEET 09 OF 10 4 3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732 SHEET NO.: 09 OF 10 s _ Email: _ .,, ... ,.. „__ E Attachment: Attachment G - Applicant's Backup, Application and Supporting Documents1 (29033 : PL20230002187 BD 159 Tahiti Street "040 N r. A 0 50 100 200 0 m JCAZZ 9NTEET s o A41 �. t. aF - m f I.h '4f ► a P PROPOSED FIXED DOCK ST OVERLAY DESIGNED: JR 1 TulTell, Hall &Associates, Inc. —1 S J TA" 1 T 1 S T DRAWN BY: RMJ 2 = Marine & Environmental Consulting CREATED: 23004.0 3. JOB NO.: 23004.00 4. 3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732 ST OVERLAY SHEET NO.: 10OF 10 B. _ mail:. _ — _. ..11 1-1 11. 11- - Attachment: Attachment G - Applicant's Backup, Application and Supporting Documents1 (29033 : PL20230002187 BD 159 Tahiti Street E 3.B.h Boathouse Criteria LDC Section 5.03.06(F) 1. Minimum side setback requirement: Fifteen feet. As proposed the dock will provide a 26.6-foot setback and a 29.6-foot setback. Therefore, this criterion is met. 2. Maximum protrusion into waterway: Twenty-five percent of canal width or 20 feet, whichever is less. The roof alone may overhang no more than 3 feet into the waterway beyond the maximum protrusion and/or side setbacks. Please see attached exhibits, the cross-section view verifying the proposed boathouse roof will extend out into the waterway no more than 31.5-feet from the property line, which is less than 25% width of the subject waterway. As proposed the dock will extend out 30-feet and the boathouse roof will extend approximately 1.5-feet further out which is allowed per the LDC boathouse criteria. 3. Maximum height: Fifteen feet as measured from the top of the seawall or bank, whichever is more restrictive, to the peak or highest elevation of the roof. Please see attached exhibits indicating the proposed boathouse roof will be 15-feet above the top of dock. 4. Maximum number of boathouses or covered structures per site: One. This criterion is met. 5. All boathouses and covered structures shall be completely open on all 4 sides. This criterion is met. 6. Roofing material and roof color shall be the same as materials and colors used on the principal structure or may be of a palm frond "chickee" style. A single-family dwelling unit must be constructed on the subject lot prior to, or simultaneously with, the construction of any boathouse or covered dock structure. The proposed roofing material will match the upland principal structure therefore this criterion is met. 7. The boathouse or covered structure must be so located as to minimize the impact on the view of the adjacent neighbors to the greatest extent practical. The boathouse is located within the required side yard setbacks and is consistent with other existing previously approved boathouses on the subject waterway. Packet Pg. 194 NOTE: DIMENSIONS TO THE DOCK ARE MEASURED FROM THE SEAWALL CAP. BOUNDARY INFORMATION FURNISHED BY CLIENT. SCALE 1" = 30' CURVE TABLE CURVE 1 LENGTH 1 RADIUS DELTA I CHORD DIR HOR Ct 1 134.401 140.00 55-00-14" N07-10-54-E 129.30 C21 43.201 45.00 55-00-13" N07-10-55-El 41.56 RIP 1" IND IO #) �SiSo FIR 51W 84 19" (NO 100) 19s.00 /C� \ O r�O �� J (61 (NO ID#) / p500 �Pl I I P y.oG�oo Ic F� RK� rA� I BENCHMA \ I FPKN&D \ (# 6004) ELEV. = 3.11' FIRC 5B (# 3964) IIw )ZC (VACANT) LOT 286 22.6' FIRC SIB" (# 3984) I g I I FISH TABLE Top OF R PRAP AT.I- SEAWALLI (IMPROVEMENTS NOT SHOWN) LOT 285 0- -CONTAINS 0.19ACRES LU OF LAND MORE OR LESS. 2 aIM .06, ' k LOT 284 Lb gIN F- I NOTE: MHW LINE ELEV.=0.4 �! ABUTS FACE OF SEAWALL PANEL I 3 TOP OF RIPRAPAT 2; SEAWALL (NO ID #) 29.6 NOTES: MAP OF 1.THE BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE CENTERLINE OF TAH1 n STREET SPECIFIC PURPOSE SURVEY AS CHOWIJ TBOOK NPAGE 48 OLLIER OF COLLIER COUNTY, BEING NORTH 55D 19' 00' WEST. (EXISTING SHORELINE CONDITIONS) 2.IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN THOSE SHOWN ARE NOTA PART OF THIS SURVEY. LOT 285 3.SAID DESCRIBED LAND IS SUBJECT TO ALL SUBDIVISION OF REGULATIONS,RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, ZONING AND ISLES OF CAPRIS N0.2 RIGHTS -OF- WAY OF RECORD. 4.DATE OF FIELD SURVEY JANUARY 25, 2023. AS RECORDED IN S.THIS SURVEY MAP IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE PLAT BOOK 3 PAGE(S) 46 AND RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS TO SURVEY MAPS OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF OR REPORTS BY OTHER THAN THE SIGNING PARTY OR PARTIES IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA OF THE SIGNING PARTY OR PARTIES. 6.SUSSURFACE AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS WERE 159 TAHITI STREET NOT EXAMINED AS A PART OF THIS SURVEY. NO STATEMENT IS MADE CONCERNING THE EXISTENCE OF UNDERGROUND OR OVERHEAD CONTAINERS, UTILITIES OR FACILITIES THAT CERTIFY TO: \ MAY AFFECT THE USE OR DEVELOPMENT OF THIS PROPERTY. BASED ON NA.V.D. DATUM OF 1966. 191N TURRELL, HALL & ASSOCIATES DESCRIPTION OF BENCHMARK IS AS FOLLOWS: FPKNDOF DESCRIPTION F BENCHMARK EAST EDGE OF ROAD IN CUL-DE-SAC ELEV. = 3.11' �]\ APPROX. B.THE PURPOSE OF THIS SURVEY IS TO SHOW THE EXISTING MANGROVE 149 ' TO SHORELINE STRUCTURES AND PARTIAL BATHYMETRIC WITH CERTIFICATION: FNG OPPOSITE RESPECT TO THE PLATTED PROPERTY LINES.. I CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY WAS MADE UNDER MY SHORE RIPARIAN LINE 9.NO TITLE OPINION OR ABSTRACT TO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY DIRECTION AND THAT IT MEETS THE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE SET FORTH BY THE BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL LINE ONLY)HAS (BYTHE / BEEN PROVIDED. ALL INFORMATION HAS BEEN SUPPLIED CLIENT. IT IS POSSIBLE THAT THERE ARE DEEDS, LAND SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS IN CHAPTER 5J-17, g EASEMENTS, OR OTHER INSTRUMENTS (RECORDED OR FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, PURSUANT TO SECTION 284 gy{ WOOD UNRECORDED) WHICH MAY AFFECT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. 472.027, FLORIDA STATUTES. TOE O p\26.6. PILE NO SEARCH OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS HAS BEEN MADE BY THE FNOTRE CETF ENCUMBRANCES., ZONING, EASEMENTS OR \ RIPRAP \ MLW LINE ELEV. -i.T ) 0 � S 25.T BOATHOUSE ROOF LINE SIGNED (RIDGE LINE x I 4V ELEV. - 12.0') ?�� a REVISIONS COURTH.GREGORY PSM#6004 26.2 DATE 01/30/2023 DELAPIDATED DATE OF FIELD SURVEY 01/2512023 I S3 WOOD DOCK, METAL LIFT & BOATHOUSE I MLW LINE 3 (ELEV.-1.T) U 1.3' WIDE CONC SEAWALL CAP (ELEV. TYP.) WATERWAY DELAPIDATED WOOD 19.5POCK 4 X = DENOTES SPOT ELEVATION (NAVD'88) \TOEOF RIPRAP RIPARIAN LINE -(LINE ONLY) LEGEND O = FOUND C) IRON ROD ( SURVEYOR ID #) (FIR) OQ = SET 1!2" IRON ROD (PSM #6004)(SIRC) . = SET 4" X 4" CONCRETE MONUMENT (PSM #6004)(SCM) El = FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT (SURVEYOR ID #)(FCM) H$�= BENCHMARK (FOUND ORSET) R/W= RIGHT OF WAY(R.O.W.) O = FOUND NAIL OR PK NAIL AND DISC ( SURVEYOR ID #) (FPKN) Q=SET PK NAIL AND DISC (PSM #6004) (SPKN&D) FD.=FOUND FN&TT- FOUND NAIL AND TIN TAB BM -BENCHMARK (M)= FIELD MEASUREMENT (C)= CALCULATED MEASUREMENT P.C.P. = PERMANENT CONTROL POINT(#) C.L.- CENTERLINE P.R.M.=PERMANENT REFERENCE MONUMENT(#) (PG)=PAGE (P) OR (D) = PLAT OR RECORDED(DEED) MEASUREMENT (PB)=PLAT BOOK PL EXT- PROPERTY LINE EXTENDED CMP" CORRUGATED METAL PIPE CAN -CABLE TV F=FINISHED FLOOR U.T.S= UNITED TELEPHONE RISER =WELL CONC = CONCRETE CB= CATCH BASIN OR INLET = WATER/GATE VALVE R.C.P. =REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE S- SANITARY SEWER PROP = PROPERTY X=SPOT ELEVATION T B = TOP OF BANK TOS = TOP OF SLOPE EOW = EDGE OF WATEF BOS = BOTTOM OF RAW BOB - BOTTOM OF SLOPE EO = EDGE OF CBS -CONCRETE BLOCK& STUCCO VG=VALLEY GLITTER ELEC.- ELECTRIC TRANS 'TRANSFORMER JAC-JACUZZI DE= DRAINAGE EASEMENT SWE= SIDEWALK EASEMENT LBE= LANDSCAPE BUFFER EASEMENT IE=IRRIG. EASEMENT PUE = PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT UE - UTILITY EASEMENT LMA(E)- LAKE MAINTENANCE ACCESS EASEMENT LME = LAKE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT A.E = ACCESS EASEMENT CUE = COUNTY (U.EJ PSM # 6004 LB # 7112 Co� Gregory Surveying, Inc. 761 Teton Court Naples, Florida 34104 (239)643-7845 office Date 01/30/2023 ogs6004@comcast.net Job # EN40251M (239)272-3707 cell Fb MI-48 Pg 4 I 3.B.h I 159 TAHITI STREET NAPLES, FL 34113 FOLIO #52395960007 SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY REPORT MARCH 2O23 PREPARED BY: TURRELL, HALL & ASSOCIATES, INC. Marine & Environmental Consulting PHONE:239-643-0166 WWW.THANAPLES.COM Packet Pg. 196 1 I 3.B.h I Table of Contents 1 Introduction.......................................................................................................................................1 2 Objective.............................................................................................................................................2 3 Methodology......................................................................................................................................3 4 Results................................................................................................................................................. 4 5 Conclusion..........................................................................................................................................5 6 Photos.................................................................................................................................................. 6 r m c� rn LO r m ti 0 N O 0 0 M N O N J a. M M O O� N Packet Pg. 197 1 I 3.B.h I 159 Tahiti Street Submerged Resource Survey March 2023 1 INTRODUCTION Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. (THA) has been contracted to provide environmental permitting services which includes completing an onsite Submerged Resource Survey (SRS) at the subject property 159 Tahiti Street in Naples, FL 34113 that can be identified by folio #52395960007. This resource survey will provide planning assistance to both the property owner and regulating agencies during the review process for the proposed project. The subject property consists of a 0.19-acre parcel that can be found on the southeast side of Isle of Capri along Snook Bay just off Tarpon Bay. The subject waterway connects directly to the Gulf of Mexico through the Big Marco River. The upland parcel currently consists of vacant single- family lot that has an existing concrete seawall shoreline with scattered riprap, an existing docking facility which was danged by Hurricane Ian and a boathouse. There is also one small red mangrove growing adjacent to the boathouse on the northeast property line. The property is neighbored to the north and south by single family residences, to the east by the subject waterway, and to the west by Tahiti Street. The SRS was conducted on March 25, 2023, between approximately 1:30p.m. and 2:15 p.m. Site conditions on that day consisted of mostly sunny skies with a southwest breeze approximately 10-15mph. Water clarity was good to fair which allowed for approximately 18-24 inches of visibility. The ambient air temperature was approximately 77 degrees Fahrenheit with an incoming tide. Low tide occurred before the site visit at approximately 10:04 a.m. and reached approximately 0.8' feet above the Mean Low Water Mark. High tide was achieved after the site visit at approximately 3:52 p.m., reaching approximately 2.70 feet above the Mean Low Water Mark. 1 Packet Pg. 198 1 I 3.B.h I 159 Tahiti Street Submerged Resource Survey March 2023 2 OBJECTIVE The objective of the SRS was to identify and locate any existing submerged resources within 200 feet of the proposed dock and boathouse facility project. Ordinarily, if seagrasses are present within the vicinity of a project area, an analysis will be required regarding species, percent coverage, and impacts projected by the proposed project. The presence of seagrasses may be ample cause for re -configuration of the design for projects over surface waters in order to minimize impacts. The general scope of work performed during a typical submerged resource survey is summarized below: • THA personnel will conduct a site visit and swim a series of transects within the project site in order to verify the location of any submerged resources. • THA personnel will identify submerged resources within the vicinity of the site and produce an estimate of the percent coverage of any resources found. • THA personnel will delineate the approximate limits of any submerged resources observed via a handheld GPS device. 2 Packet Pg. 199 1 159 Tahiti Street I 3.B.h I Submerged Resource Survey March 2023 3 METHODOLOGY THA biologists intentionally designed the methodology of the SRS to cover not only the entire subject property shoreline for the proposed dock and boathouse installation but also the area within 200 ft. of the proposed site as required by the Collier County LDC. The components utilized for this survey included: • Reviewing aerial photography of the surveyed area. • Establishing survey transect lines (spaced approximately 10 feet apart) overlaid onto aerials. (See attached Exhibits) • Physically swimming the transects, GPS locating the limits of any submerged resources found, and determining the percent coverage within the area. • Documenting and photographing all findings The surveyed area was evaluated systematically by following the established transect lines throughout the project site as shown on the attached exhibit. Neighboring properties, adjacent docking facilities, and other landmarks provided reference markers which assisted in maintaining correct positioning over each transect. During this SRS, one THA staff member swam the transect lines using snorkel equipment while a second remained on the boat taking notes and compiling findings on an aerial of the project site. Ordinarily, if any resources are found, they are photographed, GPS located, delineated, and analyzed for percent coverage within the area via a half meter square quadrat. 3 Packet Pg. 200 159 Tahiti Street I 3.B.h I Submerged Resource Survey March 2023 4 RESULTS The substrate found within the surveyed area consists of 2 different characteristics one being a silty sand material with shell debris and the other was more of a slit muck material observed out in the deeper parts of the surveyed area. Depths increased gradually with distance from the shoreline to the middle of the waterway and then got shallower as we reached the other side of the waterway up along the mangrove shoreline with depths ranging from approximately 2 to 12 feet. During the submerged portion of the survey, no seagrasses, oysters, or other resources were observed in any capacity. Accordingly, no impacts to submerged resources are expected to occur as the result of the proposed project. A list of species observed during the SRS can be seen below in Table 1. Table 1: Observed species of wildlife and vegetation within the vicinity of the project site Common Name Scientific Name Eastern mudminnow Umbra pygmaea Shee shead Archosar us probatocephalus Bottle -nosed dolphin Tursio s truncatus Unknown tunicate A lidium spp. Greenback Oncorh nchus clarkii stomias H Packet Pg. 201 159 Tahiti Street I 3.B.h I Submerged Resource Survey March 2023 5 CONCLUSION The submerged resource survey was conducted and completed throughout a 200-foot radius surrounding the project site and yielded few results. An existing concrete seawall is present along the shoreline and docking facility with an associated boathouse. There were no seagrasses or other marine resources that were observed anywhere within the vicinity of the project site. There were significant amounts of barnacles and oyster debris observed in and around the mangrove roots, on docks piles, face of seawall and on the rip -rap which was all mostly contained up along the shoreline. Based off these observations it is THA opinion that the proposed project will not have any negative impacts to any submerged resources nor the subject waterway water quality. 61 Packet Pg. 202 159 Tahiti Street I 3.B.h I 6 PHOTOS Submerged Resource Survey March 2023 Photo 1: Existing property shoreline and dock. Photo 2: Boathouse and mangrove on NE property line 6 Packet Pg. 203 159 Tahiti Street I 3.B.h I Submerged Resource Survey March 2023 Photo 3: View of subject waterway. Photo 4: Existing Seawall and Dock piles with Barnacle growth. 7 Packet Pg. 204 159 Tahiti Street I 3.B.h I Submerged Resource Survey March 2023 176 Photo 5: View of rip -rap along shoreline. Photo 6: Typical sediment observed in survey area. Packet Pg. 205 I 3.B.h I 159 Tahiti Street Photo 7: View of typical bottom sediment. Ci Submerged Resource Survey March 2023 Packet Pg. 206 .r, U _ Y it - -. ,. awl r a PUBLIC HEA N FOR 159 Tahiti St. BOAT DOCK EXTENSION To Allow a 30-foot Protrusion Petition No. PL20230002187 Growth•ement Building 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, 609/610 it IN i C John r `4; e fr, 3.0 06/13/2024 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Hearing Examiner Item Number: 3.0 Doc ID: 28886 Item Summary: PETITION NO. PDI PL20240000770 — Hammock Park Development, LLC - Collier Boulevard and Rattlesnake Hammock Road - requests an insubstantial change to the Hammock Park MPUD, Ordinance 07-30, as amended, for one deviation from the required parking for a multi -tenant commercial building, pursuant to Land Development Code (LDC) Section 4.05.04.G, Table 17, not meeting the LDC shopping center threshold, to be calculated based on the square footage of each use, to allow instead the parking for a multi -tenant commercial building containing a minimum of seven (7) tenants/units and a minimum floor area of at least 15,000 square feet to be calculated as a shopping center (e.g., at one (1) space per 250 square feet), pursuant and subject to LDC Section 4.05.04.G, Table 17, Shopping Center. The subject 2.75 +/- acre parcel is part of the 19.13 +/- acre MPUD and is located at the northeast corner of Collier Boulevard and Rattlesnake Hammock Road in Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida [Coordinator: Timothy Finn, Planner III] Commissioner District 1 Meeting Date: 06/13/2024 Prepared by: Title: — Zoning Name: Tim Finn 05/21/2024 4:44 PM Submitted by: Title: Zoning Director — Zoning Name: Mike Bosi 05/21/2024 4:44 PM Approved By: Review: Growth Management Community Development Department Diane Lynch Hearing Examiner (GMD Approvers) Diane Lynch Review Item Operations & Regulatory Management Diane Lynch GMCDD Reviewer Unknown Jaime Cook GMCDD Reviewer Operations & Regulatory Management Michael Stark Review Item Zoning Ray Bellows Review Item Zoning Zoning Hearing Examiner James Sabo Review Item Mike Bosi Review Item Andrew Dickman Meeting Pending GMD Approver Skipped 05/28/2024 3:36 PM Completed 05/29/2024 12:02 PM Skipped 05/29/2024 12:11 PM Completed 06/03/2024 6:48 AM Completed 06/03/2024 12:12 PM Completed 06/03/2024 1:36 PM Completed 06/04/2024 4:22 PM Completed 06/05/2024 2:16 PM 06/13/2024 9:00 AM Packet Pg. 208 3.C.a Collier County STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FROM: ZONING DIVISION — ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: JUNE 13, 2024 SUBJECT: PDI-PL20240000770, HAMMOCK PARK PROPERTY OWNER/APPLICANT/AGENT: Property Owner/Applicant: Hammock Park Development, LLC 7742 Alico Road Fort Myers, FL 33912 REQUESTED ACTION: Agent: Jem Frantz, AICP RVI Planning + Landscape Architecture 28100 Bonita Grande Dr. Bonita Springs, FL 34135 The applicant requests that the Hearing Examiner (HEX) consider an insubstantial change to the Hammock Park MPUD, Ordinance 07-30, as amended, for one deviation from the required parking for a multitenant commercial building, pursuant to Land Development Code (LDC) Section 4.05.04.G, Table 17, not meeting the LDC shopping center threshold, to be calculated based on the square footage of each use, to allow instead the parking for a multitenant commercial building containing a minimum of seven (7) tenants/units and a minimum floor area of at least 15,000 square feet to be calculated as a shopping center (e.g. at one (1) space per 250 square feet), pursuant and subject to LDC Section 4.05.04.G, Table 17, Shopping Center. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject 2.75 +/- acre parcel is part of the 19.13 +/- acre MPUD and is located at the northeast corner of Collier Boulevard and Rattlesnake Hammock Road in Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. (See Location Map on the following page) PDI-PL20240000770, Hammock Park Last revised: 5/28/24 Hearing Examiner (HEX) Date: 6/13/24 Page 1 of 7 Packet Pg. 209 3.C.a K � t� JlLeR. Q HaciendaKWY Na es r7 PROJECT r. T Cl LOCATION i r `� ---� ark r R 09 o { 4 ya aclo TFRN lacio 'fER S Leh'' Cultu I PK Y L cello TER ucello YER r-aam ohns RD Location Map PDI-PL20240000770, Hammock Park Hearing Examiner (HEX) Date: 6/13/24 MI ®AMERISITE CB IiAP4J6 MPUD� GOOD TURN CENTER HAM M6C K'PAR K COMMERCE CENTER MPUD Petition Number: PL20240000770 Last revised: 5/28/24 SITE LOCATION CARMAN RPUD DRIVE 15 RPUD MPUD MPUD TCMULLEN TRACT Gp •• U-) MPUD HACIENDA LAKES Zoning Map Page 2 of 7 0 a 0 Ca L Y L a Y t� 0 E E to 2 0 n 0 0 0 0 N 0 N J a w co 00 00 a I fC IL 0 E E x 0 a U) E a I Packet Pg. 210 3.C.a PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The subject undeveloped property was originally rezoned from Rural Agricultural (A) to PUD in 2000 per Ordinance Number 00-79. In 2007, the subject property was rezoned from PUD to CPUD per Ordinance Number 07-30 to allow a maximum of 160,000 square feet of commercial retail and office uses. The CPUD was amended in 2014 per HEX Decision 2014-28 to allow for signage related to Hacienda Lakes of Naples PUD. The CPUD was amended again in 2016 per HEX Decision 2016-42 to allow for the construction of accessory structures. Per Ordinance No. 2020-39, approved by the Board of County Commissioners on October 27, 2020, the subject property was rezoned to a Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) to allow for a development option of 265 multi -family units and 80,000 SF of commercial uses. In March 2021, a 137-foot waiver from the minimum required separation of 500 feet between facilities with fuel pumps was granted via HEX decision 2021-13. In July 2021, the MPUD was amended, per HEX Decision 2021-28, to allow sign deviations. In September 2021, the MPUD was amended via HEX 2021-46 to allow for the height increase of a fence to eight (8) feet, to clarify the text pertaining to affordable housing, and to modify a commercial restaurant to allow outdoor seating. The applicant requests that the Hearing Examiner (HEX) consider an insubstantial change to the Hammock Park MPUD, Ordinance 07-30, as amended, for one deviation from the required parking for a multi -tenant commercial building, pursuant to LDC Section 4.05.04.G, Table 17, not meeting the LDC shopping center threshold, to be calculated based on the square footage of each use, to allow instead the parking for a multi -tenant commercial building containing a minimum of seven (7) tenants/units and a minimum floor area of at least 15,000 square feet to be calculated as a shopping center (e.g. at one (1) space per 250 square feet), pursuant and subject to LDC Section 4.05.04.G, Table 17, Shopping Center. The following are the changes proposed for this PDI: 1. Add a deviation to allow the parking for a multitenant commercial building containing a minimum of seven (7) tenants/units and a minimum floor area of at least 15,000 square feet to be calculated as a shopping center (e.g., at one (1) space per 250 square feet). Petitioner and Staff response: See the Deviation Discussion in the staff report. LAND USE AND ZONING: This section of the staff report identifies the land uses and zoning classifications for properties near the portion of the PUD affected by the request. North: Currently being developed as a 188-unit independent living facility with a zoning designation of Good Turn Center PUD, which allows 100,000 square feet of commercial land use and/or a variety of skilled nursing care facility uses with a maximum of 200 units East: Currently being developed with 265 multi -family units with a zoning designation of Hammock Park MPUD, which allows 265 multi -family rental dwelling units plus 80,000 s.f. of commercial development as an alternative to 160,000 s.f. of retail and office currently allowed PDI-PL20240000770, Hammock Park Last revised: 5/28/24 Page 3 of 7 Hearing Examiner (HEX) Date: 6/13/24 Packet Pg. 211 3.C.a South: Currently being developed with a gasoline service station with a zoning designation of Hammock Park MPUD, which allows 265 multi -family rental dwelling units plus 80,000 s.f. of commercial development as an alternative to 160,000 s.f. of retail and office currently allowed West: SFWMD 951 Canal, Collier Boulevard, a 6-lane divided roadway, and a developed commercial strip shopping center with a zoning designation of Naples Lakes Country Club PUD and a gross density of 1.67 dwelling units per acre. AERIAL PHOTO STAFF ANALYSIS: Rallksn�.e H�nn.a'* R{ Comprehensive Planning: Because this application is not adding uses or increasing the intensity of the previously approved uses in the Hammock Park MPUD, it is consistent with the GMP's Future Land Use Element (FLUE). (See Attachment D — Consistency Review Memo) Conservation and Coastal Management Element: Environmental staff has evaluated the proposed changes to the PUD documents and found no issue with consistency. Transportation Element: Transportation Planning staff has evaluated the proposed changes to the PUD documents and found no issue with consistency. PDI-PL20240000770, Hammock Park Last revised: 5/28/24 Page 4 of 7 Hearing Examiner (HEX) Date: 6/13/24 Packet Pg. 212 3.C.a LDC Sections 10.02.13.E.1 and 10.02.13.E.2 set forth the criteria by which insubstantial amendments to a PUD Master Plan and/or minor text changes to a PUD Document are to be reviewed before they can be approved. The criteria and a response to each have been listed as follows: LDC Section 10.02.13.E.1: a. Is there a proposed change in the boundary of the Planned Unit Development (PUD)? No, there is no proposed change in the boundary of the PUD. b. Is there a proposed increase in the total number of dwelling units, intensity of land use, or height of buildings within the development? No, there is no proposed increase in the number of dwelling units, intensity of land use, or height of buildings within the development. C. Is there a proposed decrease in preservation, conservation, recreation, or open space areas within the development in excess of 5% of the total acreage previously designated as such, or five acres in area? No, there is no proposed decrease in preservation, conservation, recreation, or open space areas within the development as designated on the approved Master Plan. d. Is there a proposed increase in the size of areas used for non-residential uses to include institutional, commercial, and industrial land uses (excluding preservation, conservation, or open space), or a proposed relocation of nonresidential land uses? There would be no increase to the size of areas used for non-residential uses and no relocation of non-residential areas. e. Is there a substantial increase in the impacts of the development, which may include, but are not limited to, increases in traffic generation, changes in traffic circulation, or impacts on other public facilities? No, there are no substantial impacts resulting from this amendment. f. Will the change result in land use activities that generate a higher level of vehicular traffic based upon the Trip Generation Manual published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers? No, there are no substantial impacts resulting from this amendment. g. Will the change result in a requirement for increased stormwater retention or otherwise increase stormwater discharge? No, the proposed changes will not impact or increase stormwater retention or increase stormwater discharge. PDI-PL20240000770, Hammock Park Last revised: 5/28/24 Page 5 of 7 Hearing Examiner (HEX) Date: 6/13/24 Packet Pg. 213 3.C.a h. Will the proposed change bring about a relationship to an abutting land use that would be incompatible with an adjacent land use? No. There will be no incompatible relationships with abutting land uses. i. Are there any modifications to the PUD Master Plan or PUD Document or amendment to a PUD ordinance which is inconsistent with the Future Land Use Element or other elements of the Growth Management Plan or which modification would increase the density of intensity of the permitted land uses? No. Comprehensive Planning staff determined the proposed changes to the PUD Document would be consistent with the FLUE of the GMP. Both environmental and transportation planning staff have reviewed this petition, and no changes to the PUD Document are proposed that would be deemed inconsistent with the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) or the Transportation Element of the GMP. This petition does not propose any increase in density or intensity of the permitted land uses. LDC Section 10.02.13.E.2: Does this petition change the analysis of the findings and criteria used for the original application? No, the proposed change does not affect the original analysis and findings for the most recent zoning action in Petition PUDA-PL20180002813. An excerpt from the staff report prepared for that petition is attached as Attachment B. DEVIATION DISCUSSION: The petitioner is seeking one deviation from the requirements of the LDC. The petitioner's rationale and staff analysis/recommendation are outlined below. Proposed Deviation #8 (Parking) "Deviation #8 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.05.04.G, Table 17, which requires parking for a multi - tenant commercial building, not meeting the LDC shopping center threshold, to be calculated based on the square footage of each use, to allow instead the parking for a multi -tenant commercial building a minimum of seven (7) tenants/units and a minimum floor area of at least 15,000 square feet to be calculated as a Shopping center (e.g., at least one (1) space per 250 square feet), pursuant and subject to LDC Section 4.05.04.G, Table 17, Shopping centers." Petitioner's Justification: The change will remove the unnecessary administrative burden of having to apply for a Site Development Plan Insubstantial Changes (SDPI) to recalculate parking every time a tenant changes for a commercial building that serves as a shopping center with various retail and service establishments within the same building. A shopping center is described by LDC Section 4.02.34.A. consisting of eight (8) or more retail business or service establishments containing a minimum total of 20, 000 square feet of floor area. The commerce center in this MPUD is one (1) establishment and 5,000 square feet of floor area less than the PDI-PL20240000770, Hammock Park Last revised: 5/28/24 Page 6 of 7 Hearing Examiner (HEX) Date: 6/13/24 Packet Pg. 214 3.C.a definition/threshold of a shopping center. As identified in the deviation limitations for shopping centers as identified in LDC Section 4.05.04, Table 17 would still apply. Uses such as restaurants which tend to create a greater need for parking are limited to 20% of the floor area of the development per LDC Section 4.05.04, parking for additional square footage over 20% of the development would still need to be provided. Additionally, the mixed -use nature of the project will encourage multi -modal access to the retail uses by the residents of the on -site multi- family units, which further supports the proposal for consolidated parking calculations that accommodate the `park once" operations of a shopping center. StaffAnalysis and Recommendation: LDC Section 4.02.34.A. states, "A shopping center must consist of eight (8) or more retail business or service establishments containing a minimum total of 20,000 square feet of floor area." The existing commercial center within the Hammock Park MPUD consists of seven (7) retail businesses or service establishments and contains a total of 15,000 square feet of floor area. Therefore, the request is one establishment and 5,000 square feet of floor area below the LDC shopping center category threshold. The mixed -use nature of the project will encourage multi - modal access to the retail uses by residents of the on -site multi -family units, and the site will provide five (5) bicycle spaces as required by LDC Section 4.05.08, both of which further support the proposal. Moreover, the deviation will remove the unnecessary administrative burden of having to apply for a SDPI to recalculate parking every time a tenant changes. As such, staff sees no detrimental effect if this deviation request is approved. Zoning staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation, finding that the deviation is in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety, and welfare of the community," and LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h, "justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to the literal application of such regulations." NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): The NIM was scheduled for Monday, May 20, 2024, at 5:30 pm at the Shepherd of Glades Church at 6020 Rattlesnake Hammock Rd, Naples, FL 34122. Four (4) members of the public were present. Josephine Medina and Alexis Crespo of RVI Planning + Landscape Architecture gave an overview of the petition and opened the meeting to the public. There were questions about the location of the petition and a proposed Costco. The agents explained they were not certain of a Costco or its location but did explain the location of the proposed deviation in the commercial area of the PUD. No commitments were made at this meeting. Attachment C- Backup Materials includes a copy of the NIM advertising and summary. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Collier County Hearing Examiner approve Petition PDI-PL20240000770 Attachments: A) Revised Section VI - PUD Document with Proposed Deviation B) Original Analysis and Findings C) Application -Backup Materials D) Consistency Review Memo PDI-PL20240000770, Hammock Park Last revised: 5/28/24 Page 7 of 7 Hearing Examiner (HEX) Date: 6/13/24 Packet Pg. 215 3.C.b SECTION VI', 2 & 3. a & s REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM THE LDC 1, 2& i3, a & s 6.1 DEVIATIONS' A. Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.04.G.2.a to allow the off -premises directional sign for the Hacienda Lakes PUD/DRI depicted on Exhibit A-1 to have a maximum of 38 square feet in sign area (total square footage of all sign copy areas, including the name of the project and insignias or mottos), rather than 12 square feet as limited in the LDC.1 B. Deviation #2 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.04.G.2.b to allow the off -premises directional sign for the Hacienda Lakes PUD/DRI depicted on Exhibit A-1 to have a maximum height of 13 feet above the lowest center grade of the roadway adjacent to the sign location, rather than 8 feet as limited in the LDC.1 C. Deviation #3 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.02.03.A, which requires accessory structures to be constructed simultaneously with or following the construction of the principal structure, to instead allow accessory structures to be constructed prior to construction of the principal structure. This deviation shall apply only to the two (2) accessory tower structures at the location depicted on Exhibit C-1, "Tower Locations," and further shown on Exhibit C-2, "Tower Renderings."2 D. Deviation #4 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.04.G.2.a, which allows for a maximum sign area of 12 square feet for off -premises directional signs, to allow for a maximum sign area of 64 square feet for the proposed temporary off -premises directional sign as depicted in Exhibit D-1 and referenced by Section 2.6.0 of the MPUD document. 3 E. Deviation #5 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.04.G.2.b, which allows for a maximum sign height of 8 feet for off -premises signs, to allow for a maximum sign height of 10 feet for the proposed off -premises sign as depicted in Exhibit D-1 and referenced by Section 2.6.0 of the MPUD document. 3 F. Deviation #6 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.04.G.2.e, which requires off -premises directional signs to be located no more than 1,000 feet from the use for which the sign is displayed, to allow the proposed temporary off -premises directional sign to be located no more than 1,320+/- feet from the use for which the sign is displayed as depicted in Exhibit D-1 and referenced by Section 2.6.0 of the MPUD document.3 G. Deviation #7 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.C, which allows for a maximum fence and wall height of 6 feet for residential zoning districts, to allow for a maximum fence and wall height of 8 feet around the multi -family residential portion on the C/MU (1) tract shown on the Hammock Park PUD master plan subject to approval from FPL and Collier County Public Utilities Department, where applicable.4 H. Deviation #8 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.05.04.G, Table 17, which requires parking for a multi -tenant commercial building, not meeting the LDC shopping center threshold, to be calculated based on the square footage of each use, to instead allow the parking for a Hammock Park MPUD — PDI-PL2024000077 Last Revised: April 17, 202 Q Words underlined are added; words stFuek thr-eugk are deleted Packet Pg. 216 3.C.b multi -tenant commercial building a minimum of 7 tenants/units and a minimum floor area of at least 15,000 square feet to be calculated as a Shopping center (e.g., at least 1 space per 250 square feet), pursuant and subject to LDC Section 4.05.04.G, Table 17, Shopping centers.s 1. Approved in HEX decision 2014-28. 2. err, deo-, sien 2U16-42 3. Pending approval per PL20200001952 Approved in HEX decision 2021-36. 4. Approved in HEX decision 2021-46 5. Pending approval per PL20240000770 Hammock Park MPUD — PDI-PL2024000077 S Last Revised: April 17, 202 Q Words underlined are added; words stFuek thr-eugk are deleted Packet Pg. 217 3.C.c Original Analysis and Findings — Hammock Park, PUDA-PL20180002813 REZONE FINDINGS: Staff offers the following analysis: 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the GMP. The Comprehensive Planning staff has indicated that the proposed PUD Amendment is consistent with all applicable elements of the FLUE of the GMP. See Attachment C — FLUE Consistency Review. 2. The existing land use pattern. As described in the "Surrounding Land Use and Zoning" portion of this report and discussed in the zoning review analysis, the neighborhood's existing land use pattern can be characterized as developed and undeveloped commercial, and undeveloped continuing care retirement communities. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. The subject parcel is of sufficient size that it will not result in an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. It is also comparable with expected land uses by virtue of its consistency with the FLUE of the GMP. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. The district boundaries are logically drawn as discussed in Items 2 and 3. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed rezone necessary. The proposed change is not necessary, but it is being requested in compliance with the LDC provisions to seek such changes because the petitioner wishes to develop the property with mixed - use and residential land uses. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. The proposed change from commercial development to mixed -use development consisting of multi -family residential and commercial development will reduce the overall intensity of land uses allowed by the current PUD. Therefore, the proposed change will not adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. Packet Pg. 218 3.C.c 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. The roadway infrastructure has adequate capacity to serve the proposed project at this time, i.e., the GMP is consistent at the time of rezoning as evaluated as part of the GMP Transportation Element consistency review. Operational impacts will be addressed at the time of the first development order (SDP or Plat). Additionally, the project's development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. The proposed development will not create a drainage problem. Furthermore, the project is subject to the requirements of Collier County and the South Florida Water Management District. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. It is anticipated that the proposed PUD Amendment will not reduce light and air to adjacent areas inside or outside the PUD. 10. Whether the proposed change would adversely affect property values in the adjacent area. This is a subjective determination based upon anticipated results, which may be internal or external to the subject property. Property valuation is affected by a host of factors including zoning; however, zoning by itself may or may not affect values, since value determination is driven by market value. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. The basic premise underlying all of the development standards in the LDC is that their sound application, when combined with the SDP and PPL approval process, gives reasonable assurance that a change in zoning will not result in deterrence to improvement or development of the adjacent property. Therefore, the proposed zoning change should not be a deterrent to the improvement of adjacent properties. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. The development complies with the GMP, which is a public policy statement supporting zoning actions when they are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. In light of this fact, the proposed Rezone does not constitute a grant of special privilege. Consistency with the FLUE is further determined to be a public welfare relationship because actions consistent with plans are in the public interest. Packet Pg. 219 3.C.c 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. The subject property can be used in accordance with existing zoning; however, the proposed uses cannot be achieved without rezoning the property. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county. The proposed PUD Amendment is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or County 15. Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. There may be other sites in the County that could accommodate the uses proposed. However, this is not the determining factor when evaluating the appropriateness of a zoning decision. The petition was reviewed on its own merit for compliance with the GMP and the LDC, and staff does not review other sites in conjunction with a specific petition. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. Any development anticipated by the PUD Document would require site alteration, and this project will undergo extensive evaluation relative to all federal, state, and local development regulations during the SDP and/or PPL processes, and as part of the building permit process. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County GMP and as defined and implemented through the Collier County adequate public facilities ordinance. The project will have to meet all applicable criteria set forth in LDC Section 6.02.00 regarding Adequate Public Facilities (APF), and the project will need to be consistent with all applicable goals and objectives of the GMP regarding adequate public facilities, except as maybe exempt by federal regulations. This petition has been reviewed by County staff responsible for jurisdictional elements of the GMP as part of the amendment process, and those staff persons have concluded that no Level of Service will be adversely impacted with the commitments contained in the PUD Document. The concurrency review for APT is determined at the time of SDP review. The activity proposed by this amendment will have no impact on public facility adequacy in regard to utilities. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. To be determined by the BCC during its advertised public hearing. Packet Pg. 220 3.C.c PUD FINDINGS: LDC Section 10.02.13.13.5 states that "In support of its recommendation, the CCPC shall make findings as to the PUD Master Plan's compliance with the following criteria:" 1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. Water distribution and wastewater collection mains are readily available along Rattlesnake Hammock Road and within the western portion of the PUD, and there are adequate water and wastewater treatment capacities to serve the proposed PUD as amended. 2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for Rezones in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Documents submitted with the application provided satisfactory evidence of unified control of the property. Additionally, the development will be required to gain SDP approval. These processes will ensure that appropriate stipulations for the provision of, continuing operation of, and maintenance of infrastructure will be provided by the developer. 3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives, and policies of the GMP. County staff has reviewed this petition and has offered an analysis of the relevant goals, objectives, and policies of the GMP within the GMP discussion of this staff report. Based on that analysis, staff has found this petition consistent with the overall GMP. 4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. The landscaping and buffering standards are compatible with the adjacent uses. 5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. The amount of open space set aside for this project meets the minimum requirement of the LDC 6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. The roadway infrastructure is sufficient to serve the proposed project, as noted in the Transportation Element consistency review. Operational impacts will be addressed at the time of Packet Pg. 221 3.C.c first development order (SDP or Plat), at which time a new TIS will be required to demonstrate turning movements for all site access points. Finally, the project's development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals, including but not limited to any SDPs or PPLs, are sought. The CCWSD has sufficient treatment capacities for water and wastewater services to the project. Conveyance capacities must be confirmed at the time of development permit application. 7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. The area has adequate supporting infrastructure, including readily available County water and wastewater mains, to accommodate this project. 8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. This criterion essentially requires an evaluation of the extent to which development standards and deviations proposed for this PUD depart from development standards that would be required for the most similar conventional zoning district. The petitioner is not seeking any new deviations. Packet Pg. 222 Coder county 3.C.d Collier County Planning Commission Agenda Packet Checklist for PUDs to be submitted by Applicants and Agents Please provide the following documents to support your petition request: Materials provided by Planner: • Staff Report • Complete Draft Ordinance /Resolution initialed by County Attorney Materials to be provided by applicant: Application • Narrative of rezone request • Property Information • Property Ownership and general description of site Disclosure of Interest ❑ Affidavit of Unified Control P1Affidavit of Representation ❑ NIM Information (Sign -in sheet, notes, minutes and/or summary, audio or video recording) ❑ Traffic Impact Study (TIS) ❑ Environmental Data ❑ Historical/Archeological Surveyor Waiver ❑ Utility Letter P1Deviation Justifications ❑ Boundary Survey P1Amended PUD Ordinance (the last submitted Ordinance with strikethrough — color preferred) WlOther documents (as needed, on a case -by -case basis) such as relevant prior ordinances, conditional uses, historical documents, any "private or legal" agreements affecting the PUD etc. Write details below. Warranty Deed, Original Rezone Staff Report, Ordinance 2020-039 & HEX Decision 2021-46 1 understand that by submitting the above materials, it is the agent/applicant's responsibility to ensure all materials are in the some order for all copies of backup materials to provide to the CCPC and the CD must contain the documents in one pdf file (not multiple files) in the some order as the printed materials. It is the agent's responsibility to ensure no documentation is left out. 05/15/2024 Signature of Agent Representative Date Josephine Medina, RVi Planning + Landscape Architecture Printed Name of Signing Agent Representative Packet Pg. 223 3.C.d HAMMOCK PARK MPUD Collier County Insubstantial Change to a PUD Application (PDI) PDI-PL20240000770 COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER PACKAGE Packet Pg. 224 3.C.d HAMMOCK PARK MPUD PDI-PL20240000770 COVERSH EET & NARRATIVE Packet Pg. 225 3.C.d April 17, 2024 Timmothy Finn, AICP Planning and Zoning Division Zoning Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 RE: Hammock Park MPUD Insubstantial Change to a Planned Unit Development (PDI) Dear Mr. Finn: Enclosed for your review is an application for an Insubstantial Change to a PUD in regard to the Hammock MPUD, a 19 +/- acre mixed use project generally located on the northeast corner of Collier Boulevard (CR 951) and Rattlesnake Hammock Road an incorporated Collier County. The Applicant is requesting one (1) new deviation (Deviation #8), specifically to allow a commercial center with 7 tenants/units and 15,000 SF of floor area or more to be treated as a shopping center for the purposes of parking calculations. The change will remove the unnecessary administrative burden of having to apply for a Site Development Plan Insubstantial Changes (SDPI) to recalculate parking every time a tenant changes. No changes to the PUD Master Plan are proposed. The revised PUD Document, Section VI, Requested Deviations from the LDC has been provided in strike through underline format adding the requested Deviation #8. BACKGROUND/PROJECT HISTORY The Hammock Park MPUD was originally rezoned from Agricultural to Planned Unit Development (PUD) in 2000 per Ordinance No. 00-79. In 2007, the Property was rezoned from PUD to Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) per Ordinance No. 07-30. The CPUD allowed the development of up to 160,000 SF of commercial uses. The CPUD was amended in 2014, per HEX decision 2014-28, to allow for ground signage associated with the Hacienda Lakes of Naples on the southwest corner of the property. A second PDI was issued in 2016 per HEX decision 2016-42 to allow for the construction of two (2) accessory tower structures 10 feet from the PUD boundary. Per Ordinance No. 2020-39, approved by the Board of County Commissioners on October 27, 2020, the subject property was rezoned to a Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) to allow for a development option of 265 multi -family units and 80,000 SF of commercial uses. The MPUD was amended in 2021, per HEX decision 2021-13 to waiver from the 500-foot separation requirement for automobile service stations to allow a 137 +/- foot separation between facilities. A PDI was issued per HEX decision 2021-46 to allow an increase in fence height to 8-feet, clarify affordable housing units are for Essential Service Providers earning 100% or less in than the County's medium income and allow outdoor seating areas for restaurants. REQUEST Hammock Park Development, LLC ("Applicant") is requesting Staff's approval of an insubstantial change to the Hammock Park MPUD to allow the parking for multitenant commercial building RV Planning + Landscape Architecture I Page 1 of 4 Hammock Park MPUD PDI Packet Pg. 226 3.C.d within the PUD to be calculated using the regulations of a shopping center at 1 parking space per 250 square feet. As further identified in the Justifications for Deviations the deviation will remove the unnecessary administrative burden of having to apply for a SDPI to recalculate parking every time a tenant changes. The change is not only burdensome but also unnecessary for a commercial building that serves as a shopping center with various retail and service establishments within the same building. Furthermore, the LDC Section 4.02.34.A. states "A shopping center must consist of eight (8) or more retail business or service establishments containing a minimum total of 20,000 square feet of floor area." The existing commercial center within the Hammock Park MPUD consists of seven (7) retail business or service establishments and contains a total of 15,000 square feet of floor area. Therefore, the request is one establishment and 5,000 square feet of floor area below the LDC shopping center category threshold. Moreover, the mixed use nature of the project will encourage multi -modal access to the retail uses by residents of the on -site multi -family units, which further supports the proposal. JUSTIFICATION/COMPLIANCE WITH LDC §10.02.13.E.1: The request complies with the thresholds for insubstantial changes to PUDs as outlined in LDC§ 10.02.13.E.1 as follows: a. A proposed change in the boundary of the PUD; No, the request will not impact the existing PUD boundary. b. A proposed increase in the total number of dwelling units or intensity of land use or height of buildings within the development; No, the request will not increase the approved density or intensity, or the height of proposed buildings. c. A proposed decrease in preservation, conservation, recreation, or open space areas within the development not to exceed 5 percent of the total acreage previously designated as such, or 5 acres in area; No, the request will not result in a decrease of preserve, conservation, recreation, or open space areas. d. A proposed increase in the size of areas used for nonresidential uses, to include institutional, commercial, and industrial land uses (excluding preservation, conservation, or open spaces), or a proposed relocation of nonresidential land uses; No, the request does not impact the size of non-residential areas or propose to relocate such use areas within the PUD boundary. e. A substantial increase in the impacts of the development which may include, but are not limited to, increases in traffic generation; changes in traffic circulation; or impacts on other public facilities; RV Planning + Landscape Architecture I Page 2 of 4 Hammock Park MPUD PDI Packet Pg. 227 3.C.d No, the request will not result in a substantial increase in the impact of the development. No change to traffic generation, traffic circulation or impacts on other facilities will result from this request. f. A change that will result in land use activities that generate a higher level of vehicular traffic based upon the Trip Generation Manual published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers; No, the request will not generate a higher level of vehicular traffic. No change in land use activities or intensities is being requested. g. A change that will result in a requirement for increased stormwater retention, or will otherwise increase stormwater discharges; No, the request will not result in increased requirements for stormwater retention or increase stormwater discharges. h. A change that will bring about a relationship to an abutting land use that would be incompatible with an adjacent land use; No, the request will not modify any existing uses or intensities, setbacks or buffers that would impact any surrounding land uses or that would be incompatible. i. Any modification to the PUD master plan or PUD document or amendment to a PUD ordinance which is inconsistent with the Future Land Use Element or other element of the Growth Management Plan or which modification would increase the density or intensity of the permitted land uses; No, the request does not impact the project's compliance with the Growth Management Plan (GMP). The proposed change is to a PUD district designated as a development of regional impact (DRI) and approved pursuant to F.S. § 380.06, where such change requires a determination and public hearing by Collier County pursuant to F.S. § 380.06(19). Any change that meets the criterion of F.S. § 380.06(19)(e)2, and any changes to a DRUPUD master plan that clearly do not create a substantial deviation shall be reviewed and approved by Collier County under this LDC section 10.02.13; or The Hammock Park MPUD is not designated as a development of regional impact (DRI). k. Any modification in the PUD master plan or PUD document or amendment to a PUD ordinance which impact(s) any consideration deemed to be a substantial modification as described under this LDC section 10.02.13. No, the request is not a substantial modification to the MPUD and may be processed as a PDI pursuant to the LDC and Administrative Code. The request complies with the thresholds for insubstantial changes to PUDs as outlined in LDC§ 10.02.13.E.2 as follows: 1. Does this petition change the analysis of findings and criteria used for the original application? RV Planning + Landscape Architecture I Page 3 of 4 Hammock Park MPUD PDI Packet Pg. 228 3.C.d As outlined in pages 9 through 15 of the original Staff Report for the PUD Rezoning of the subject MPUD the proposed petition has not modified the original analysis of findings and criteria. No change to the permitted land uses, intensities or compatibility with surrounding land uses are being requested as part of the petition. CONCLUSION: In summary, the proposed Insubstantial Change will reduce the administrative burden placed upon the property owner/tenants and County Staff to review a new SDPI every time a tenant use changes. Furthermore, the commercial building provides various retail and service needs and operates like a shopping center. The building is just one tenant/unit and 4,000 square feet of floor area below the LDC threshold for a shopping center. This application will not negatively impact public health, safety, or welfare, and the MPUD will remain consistent with the LDC and GMP. Should you require additional information or have any questions, please feel free to contact me directly at 239-908-3421 or JMedina(cDRViPlanning.com. Sincerely, RVi Planning + Landscape Architecture Jo ephine Medina, AICP, LEED Green Assoc. Project Manager Enclosures cc: Taylor Whitcomb, Hammock Park Development, LLC David E. Torres, Hammock Park Development, LLC RVi Planning + Landscape Architecture I Page 4 of 4 Hammock Park MPUD PDI Packet Pg. 229 3.C.d PDI APPLICATION HAMMOCK PARK MPUD PDI-PL20240000770 Packet Pg. 230 Need Help? 3.C.d Co ter County Growth Management Community Development Department GMCD Public Portal Online Payment Guide E-Permitting Guides Insubstantial Change to a PUD (PDI) LDC subsection 10 Chapter 3 of the Administrative Code Pursuant to LDC subsection 10, a PUD insubstantial change includes any change that is not considered a substantial or a minor change. A PUD insubstantial change to an approved PUD ordinance shall be based upon an evaluation of LDC subsection 10 and shall require the review and approval of the Hearing Examiner. The Hearing Examiner's approval shall be based on the findings and criteria used for the original application. APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Property Owner(s): Hammock Park Development, LLC Name of Applicant if different than owner: Address: 7742 Alico Road Telephone: 239.231.3308 City: Fort Myers State: FL ZIP: 33912 Cell: Fax: E-Mail Address: twhitcomb@fl-star.com Name of Agent: Josephine Medina, AICP Firm: RVI Planning + Landscape Architecture Address: 28100 Bonita Grande Drive City: Bonita Springs State: FL Zip: 34135 Telephone: 239.908.3421 Cell: Fax: E-Mail Address: jmedina@rviplanning.com DETAIL OF REQUEST On a separate sheet, attached to the application, describe the insubstantial change request. Identify how the request does not meet the PUD substantial change criteria established in LDC subsection 10.02.13 E.1. Revised 2024 Page 1 of 4 Division • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 •239-252-2400 Packet Pg. 231 w ww. co I l i e rco u n tvf I. a ov/ Need Help? I 3.C.d I Co ter County Growth Management Community Development Department PUD NAME: Hammock Park MPUD FOLIO NUMBER(S): 00416720000 GMCD Public Portal Online Payment Guide E-Permitting Guides ORDINANCE NUMBER: 20-039 Provide a legal (if PUD is recorded) or graphic description of area of amendment (this may be graphically illustrated on Amended PUD Master Plan). If applying for a portion of the PUD, provide a legal description for subject portion. Attach on a separate sheet, a written description of the map or text change. Does amendment comply with the Growth Management Plan? 0 Yes ❑ No If no, please explain: Has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? ❑ Yes x❑ No If yes, in whose name? Has any portion of the PUD been x❑ SOLD and/or x❑ DEVELOPED? Are any changes proposed for the area sold and/or developed? ❑ Yes x❑ No If yes, please describe on an attached separate sheet. Revised 2024 Page 2 of 4 Division • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 •239-252-2400 Packet Pg. 232 w ww. co I l i e rco u n tvf I. a ov/ Need Help? Co ter County Growth Management Community Development Department GMCD Public Portal Online Payment Guide E-Permitting Guides The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Completed Application (download current form from County website) Pre -Application Meeting notes ❑ Project Narrative, including a detailed description of proposed changes and why amendment is necessary ® ❑ Detail of request Current Master Plan & 1 Reduced Copy Revised Master Plan & 1 Reduced Copy Revised Text and any exhibits PUD document with changes crossed through & underlined PUD document as revised with amended Title Page with Ordinance # Warranty Deed Legal Description Boundary survey, if boundary of original PUD is amended If PUD is platted, include plat book pages List identifying Owner & all parties of corporation Affidavit of Authorization, signed & notarized Completed Addressing Checklist Property Ownership Disclosure Form Copy of 8 % in. x 11 in. graphic location map of site Electronic copy of all documents and plans *Please advise: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all materials to be submitted electronically in PDF format. ❑ EJ *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: • Following the completion of the review process by County Review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. • Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. Revised 2024 Division • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 • 239-252-2400 www. co I l i e rco u n tvf I. a ov/ Page 3 of 4 Packet Pg. 233 I 3.C.d I Co ter County Growth Management Community Development Department Need Help? GMCD Public Portal Online Payment Guide E-Permitting Guides PLANNERS — INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: ❑ School District (Residential Components): Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment: Executive Director Utilities Engineering: ❑ Parks and Recreation: ® Emergency Management: Naples Airport Authority: Conservancy of SWFL: Other: ® City of Naples: H Other: FEE REQUIREMENTS ki PUD Amendment Insubstantial (PDI): $1,500.00 Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 ❑ Estimated Legal Advertising fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner: $1,125.00 Same fee applies if the petition is referred to the Collier County Planning Commission, where the CCPC serves as the deciding authority instead of the HEX. ❑ Fire Planning Review Fee: $150.00 Fire Code Plans Review Fees are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. 03/05/2024 Agent/Owner Signature Date Josephine Medina Applicant/Owner Name (please print) Revised 2024 Page 4 of 4 Division • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 •239-252-2400 Packet Pg. 234 www. co I l i e rco u n tvf I. g ov/ 3.C.d l3v WARRANTY DEED HAMMOCK PARK MPUD PDI-PL20240000770 Packet Pg. 235 INSTR 5981436 OR 5872 PG 2283 E-RECORDED 1/7/2021 12:48 PM PAGES 3 CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT AND COMPTROLLER, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA Doc@.70 $0.70 REC $27.00 CONS $10.00 3.C.d This Warranty Deed Prepared Without Review or Opinion of Title by: Harold J. Webre, Esquire COLEMAN, YOVANOVICH & KOESTER, P.A. 4001 Tarniami Trail N., Suite 300 Naples, FL 34103 (239) 435-3535 Consideration: ; $10.#0 (NOTE. This transfer is between related entities for nominal consideration only) WARRANTY DEED M THIS WARRANTY 'DEI D is made this 0S day of �L � , 2020, between Wilton. Land Company, 'LL, a Florida limited liability company, whose address is 206 Dudley Road, Wilton, CT"66897 (`.Grantor"), and Hammock Park Apartments, LLC, a Florida limited liability compay, wose address is 7742 Alico Rd., Fort Myers, FL 33912 ("Grantee"). Grantor, in consideration of `t other good and valuable consideration which is hereby acknowledged, has gra successors and assigns forever, the fo Collier County, Florida, to wit: TEN AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($10.00) and ;cantor in hand paid by Grantee, the receipt of fined and sold to the said Grantee and Grantee's Gibed property, situated, lying and being in See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorpo ted herein by reference. PARCEL ID NUMBER: 00416720000 `t SUBJECT TO: (a) ad valorem and non ad valorem I property taxes for 2020 and subsequent years; (b) comprehensive land use pl honing, restrictions, prohibitions and other requirements imposed by govrs" ntal authority; (c) outstanding oil, gas and mineral interests of record, if - y a4' d, (d) covenants, easements, restrictions and other matters of record. 7 And said Grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said property; mid xV , I defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. Warranty Deed Page'No, i of Packet Pg. 236 OR 5872 PG 2284 3.C.d IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has executed and delivered this Warranty Deed the day and year first above written. Signed, in our r Witness 1 — Si Witness l - Printed Name Witness 2 — Signature Witness 2 - Printed Name STATE OF +-Wh COUNTY OF Lee — Wilton Land Company, LLC, a Florida limited liability company By: �i George P. Ba er, as Trustee of the George P. Bauer Revocable Trust dated July 20, 1990, its Manager (Company Seao The foregoing Warranty Deed was acknowledged '-b; e me by means of W physical presence or U online notarization, on this 2 �9 day of rz , 2020, by George P. Bauer, as Trustee of the George P. Bauer Revocable Trust date Jul 20, 1990, as Manager of Wilton Land Company, LLC, a Florida limited liability company: HT.-[ ] is personally known to me or [_J produced as identifica Qn,1 .. Notary Public State of Fonda charlotte M. walkup Kota Public - r My Commam GG 945456 � Jf Expires O 2t►2o24 Print Name: L Warranty Deed Page No. 2 of 2 Packet Pg. 237 *** OR 5872 PG 2285 *** 3.C.d EXHIBIT A South Half (S 1/2) of the Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4) of the Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4) of Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, LESS the West 100 feet, and LESthe land described in Warranty Deed filed in Official Records Book 4336, page 3 1. the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. and The West Eighty feet (80') of the South Half (S 1/2) of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of the Southwest Quarter (514} of Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, LESS(the-lard described in Warranty Deed filed in Official Records Book 4336, page 3681f tie Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Packet Pg. 238 3.C.d HAMMOCK PARK MPUD PDI-PL20240000770 ADDRESS CHECKLIST Packet Pg. 239 3.C.d COlfler county Growth Management Community Development Department ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following and upload via the CityView Portal with your submittal. Items marked with (*) are required for every application, other items are optional and may not apply to every project. Forms are valid for 6 months following their submittal; an updated form will be required for a new submittal after that timeframe and any time the properties within the project boundary are modified. Additional documents may be attached to this form and can include: - * LOCATION MAP and/or SURVEY showing the proposed project boundary. - List of additional folio numbers and associated legal descriptions. - E-mail from Addressing Official for any pre -approved project and/or street names. LOCATION INFORMATION *FOLIO (Property ID) Number(s) of subject property or properties. [Attach list if necessary] 00416720000 *LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties. [Attach list if necessary] 14 50 26 A PARCEL OF LAND AS DESC AS FOLLOWS: COM AT NW COR OF HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES TR G, TH N 65.4FT, N 326. STREET ADDRESS(ES) where applicable, if already assigned. 8582 COLLIER BLVD PROJECT INFORMATION Acceptance of this form does not constitute project and/or street name approval and is subject to further review by the Addressing Official. Pre -Approval may be requested by contacting us at GMD_Add ressing@colliercountyfLgov or 239-252-2482 prior to your submittal. CURRENT PROJECT NAME Hammock Park MPUD PROPOSED PROJECT NAME PROPOSED STREET NAME(s) LATEST APPROVED PROJECT NUMBER [e.g., SDP-94-##, PPL-2002-AR-####, PL2017000####] PL20230014514 Addressing Checklist (Rev 10/2022) Page 1 of 1 Operations & Regulatory Management Division • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 • 239-252-2400 www.coll iercountyfl.gov Packet Pg. 240 fV L-A :L J 3.C.d HAMMOCK PARK MPUD PDI-PL20240000770 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM Packet Pg. 242 CoVY COunty 3.C.d Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1036 1 Email: GMDClientServices@colliercountyfl.gov www.colliercountyfl.gov PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: 17 C. Name and Address I % of Ownership If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the ercentage oT stocK owneu Uy eacn: Name and Address I % of Ownership I If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest: Name and Address I % of Ownership 01/2023 Page 1 of 3 Packet Pg. 243 C;Aer County 3.C.d Beneficiary David E. Torres e f C Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1036 ( Email: GMDClientServices@colliercountyfl.gov www.colliercountyfl.gov If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners: Name and Address % of Ownership Hammock Park Development, LLC - 7742 Alico Road, Fort Myers, FL 33912 100% David E. Torres Revocable Trust 20% George P Bauer Revocable Trust 80% George P Bauer, Beneficiary If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the 11HU21J, JLUL.KIIUWUIJ, LJCIICIIL.IdIICJ, UI PdILIIt: IJ: Name and Address % of Ownership Date of Contract: If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or of I ILCI J, II d L.UI IJUI dLIUI I, Pdl LIICI JI lip/ UI LI uJL. Name and Address Date subject property acquired ❑ Leased: Term of lease 12/28/2020 years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: 01/2023 Page 2 of 3 Packet Pg. 244 Cof.r County 3.C.d Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1036 1 Email: GMDClientServices@colliercountyfl.gov www.colliercountyfl.gov Date of option: Date option terminates: Anticipated closing date: or AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form. Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest -holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition's final public hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. 1 understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. *The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Community Development Department I GMD Portal: https://cvportal.colliercountyfl.gov/cityviewweb Questions? Email: GMDclientservices@colliercountyfl.gov Agent/Owner Signa U David E Torres, e,,- Agent/Owner Name (please nt) Date 01/2023 Page 3 of 3 Packet Pg. 245 3.C.d HAMMOCK PARK MPUD PDI-PL20240000770 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION Packet Pg. 246 3.C.d AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PL20240000770 l David E. Torres (print name), as Managing Member (title, if applicable) of Hammock Park Development, LLc (company, If applicable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner applicant =contract purchaser=and that: 1. 1 have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 55. We/1 authorize RVi Planning+ Landscape Architecture to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. *Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pros. or v. pres. is If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member' • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner" of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee". • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts stated in it are trm°e1 , A, / Sig STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER Date The foregoing instrument was acknowleged before me by means of D]fphysical presence or ® online notarization this 7 day of Fc b , 20,al, by (printed name of owner or qualifier) f i -.(e5 Such person(s) Notary Public must check applicable box: PAre personally known to me El Has produced a current drivers license Has produced as identification. Notary Signature: o Lo�ym_�w\ L�C,�y SLR_ TAMELAM.SCHRODER MY COMMISSION # HH 121444 FL. Ei(PIRt~$; April 25, 2025 CPti08-CQA-00L151l55Bon�nru�Pu�ume�0rsREV 3/412020 Packet Pg. 247 3/6/24, 11:02 AM Detail by Entity Name DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS .J—`1� u►► ujfir[s►i 3fut� of Ilur�!!�e LspG�'!Iv Department of State / Division of Corporations / Search Records / Search by Entity Name / Detail by Entity Name Florida Limited Liability Company HAMMOCK PARK DEVELOPMENT, LLC Filing Information Document Number L20000166578 FEI/EIN Number 85-2289754 Date Filed 06/16/2020 Effective Date 06/16/2020 State FL Status ACTIVE Last Event LC NAME CHANGE Event Date Filed 08/26/2021 Event Effective Date NONE Principal Address 7742 ALICO RD FT MYERS, FL 33912 Mailing Address 7742 ALICO RD FT MYERS, FL 33912 Registered Agent Name & Address TORRES, DAVID E 7742 ALICO RD FT. MYERS, FL 33912 Authorized Persons) Detail Name & Address Title MGR TORRES, DAVID E 7742 ALICO RD FT. MYERS, FL 33912 Annual Reports Report Year Filed Date 2021 03/18/2021 2022 02/01 /2022 https://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=EntityName&directionType=Initial&searchNameOrd Packet Pg. 248 3/6/24, 11:02 AM 2023 02/02/2023 Detail by Entity Name Document Images 02/02/2023 --ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 02/01/2022 --ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 08/26/2021 -- LC Name Change View image in PDF format 03/18/2021 --ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 06/16/2020 -- Florida Limited Liability View image in PDF format Florida Department of State, Division of Corporations https://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=EntityName&directionType=Initial&searchNameOr Packet Pg. 249 3.C.d F,,ddlb�l 'w% A� (Requestor's Name) (Address) (Address) (City/State/Zip/Phone #) ❑ PICK-UP ❑ WAIT ❑ MAIL (Business Entity Name) (Document Number) Certified Copies Certificates of Status Special Instructions to Filing Officer: Office Use Only 300372327223 __I; -r; C17 Cl1 J ye r-� Z7- Packet Pg. 250 COVER LETTER 3.C.d TO: Registration Section Division of Corporations SUBJECT: CL+r rr-O C L I Nance of Limited Liability Cc The enclosed Articles of Amendment and fee(s) arc submitted for filing. Please return all correspondence concerning this matter to the following: cl (tm c_'(J5 , )JI C. y Name of Person ' f Firm/Company Address rktje,--� �� 2j, �� 12- City/State and Zip Came mail address: (to be used for future annual report notification) For further information concerning this matter, please call: �] at ��) z i L/- Name of Person Area Code Daytime 'telephone Number Enclose -is a check for the following amount: $25.00 Filing Fee ❑ S30.00 Filing Fee & Certificate of Status Mailine Address:. Registration Section Division of Corporations P.O. Box 6327 Tallahassee, FL 32314 ❑ $55.00 Filing Fee &. Certified Copy (additional copy is enclosed) ❑ $60.00 Filing Fee, Certificate of Status & Certified Copy (additional copy is enclosed) Street Address: Registration Section Division of Corporations The Centre of Tallahassee 2415 N. Monroe Street, Suite 810 Tallahassee, FL 32303 Packet Pg. 251 3.C.d ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT TO ARTICLES OF ORGANIZATION OF 1 , r.1YriC= C. 'PG The Articles of Organization for this Limited Liability Company were filed on 1,2- and assigned Florida document number L.,)-oocc) 1- % This amendment is submitted to amend the following: A. If amending name, enter the new name of the limited liability company here: l The new name must be distinguishable and contain the words "Limited Liability Company," the designation "LLC" or the abbreviation Enter new principal offices address, if applicable: o Princi al office address MUST BE A STREET ADDRESS �- -r t r r y Enter new mailing address, if applicable: --_ �- (Mailing address MAY BE A POST OFFICE BOX) Fn B. If amending the registered agent and/or registered office address on our records, enter the name of the new retistered agent and/or the new registered office address here: Name of New Registered Agent: New Registered Office Address: city New Registered Agent's Signature, if changing Registered Agent: F•nier Florida street address Florida 7.ip Code I herebv accept the appointment as registered agent and agree to act in this capacity. I further agree to comply with the provisions of all statutes relative to the proper and complete performance of my duties, and I am familiar with and accept the obligations of my position as registered agent as provided for in Chapter 605, F.S. Or, if this document is being filed to merely reflect a change in the registered office address, I hereby confirm that the limited liability company has been notified in writing of this change. If Changing Registered Agent, Signature of New Registered Agent Packet Pg. 252 3.C.d If ai'nendingAuthorized Person(s) authorized to manage, enter the title name and address of each person being added or removed from our records: MGR = Manager AMBR= Authorized Member Title Name Address Type of Action ❑ Add ❑ Remove ❑ Change ❑Add ❑ Rcmovc Cr. :arc-) � "�DChangc :;7� ❑Ads =� {" ❑Rcmovc ❑ Change ❑ Add ❑ Remove ❑Change ❑ Add ❑ Remove ❑ Change ❑ Add ❑ Rcmovc Packet Pg. 253 3.C.d D. if amending any other information, enter change(s) here: (Attach additional sheets, ifnecessarv.) r't C J E. Effective date, if other than the date of filing: (optional) (If an effective date is listed, the date must he specific and cannot be prior to date of filing or more than 90 days after filing.) Pursuant to 605.0207 (3)(b) Note: If the date inserted in this block does not meet the applicable statutory filing requirements, this date will not be listed as the document's effective date on the Department of States records. If the record specifics a delayed effective date, but not an effective time, at 12:01 a.m. on the earlier of, (b) The 90th day after the record is filed. Datedt of a member or authorized representative Typed or printed name of signee Packet Pg. 254 3.C.d HAMMOCK PARK MPUD PDI-PL20240000770 DEVIATION JUSTIFICATION Packet Pg. 255 3.C.d X Hammock Park MPUD PDI Justifications For Deviations Deviation 1-7: No changes Deviation 8: Deviation from LDC Section 4.05.04.G, Table 17, which requires parking for a multitenant commercial building, not meeting the LDC shopping center threshold, to be calculated based on the square footage of each use, to instead allow the parking for a multitenant commercial building a minimum of 7 tenants/units and a minimum floor area of at least 15,000 square feet to be calculated as a Shopping center (e.g., at least 1 space per 250 square feet), pursuant and subject to LDC Section 4.05.04.G, Table 17, Shopping centers. JUSTIFICATION: The change will remove the unnecessary administrative burden of having to apply for a Site Development Plan Insubstantial Changes (SDPI) to recalculate parking every time a tenant changes for a commercial building that serves as a shopping center with various retail and service establishments within the same building. A shopping center is described by LDC Section 4.02.34.A. consisting of eight (8) or more retail business or service establishments containing a minimum total of 20,000 square feet of floor area. The commerce center in this MPUD is one (1) establishment and 5,000 square feet of floor area less than the definition/threshold of a shopping center. As identified in the deviation limitations for shopping centers as identified in LDC Section 4.05.04, Table 17 would still apply. Uses such as restaurants which tend to create a greater need for parking are limited to 20% of the floor area of the development per LDC Section 4.05.04, parking for additional square footage over 20% of the development would still need to be provided. Additionally, the mixed -use nature of the project will encourage multi -modal access to the retail uses by the residents of the on -site multi -family units, which further supports the proposal for consolidated parking calculations that accommodate the "park once" operations of a shopping center. RV Planning + Landscape Architecture I Page 1 of 1 Hammock Park MPUD PDI Packet Pg. 256 3.C.d HAMMOCK PARK MPUD PDI-PL20240000770 AMENDED PUD ORDINANCE Packet Pg. 257 3.C.d SECTION VI', z & 3. a & 5 REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM THE LDC 1, 2& i3, a & 5 6.1 DEVIATIONS' A. Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.04.G.2.a to allow the off -premises directional sign for the Hacienda Lakes PUD/DRI depicted on Exhibit A-1 to have a maximum of 38 square feet in sign area (total square footage of all sign copy areas, including the name of the project and insignias or mottos), rather than 12 square feet as limited in the LDC.1 B. Deviation #2 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.04.G.2.b to allow the off -premises directional sign for the Hacienda Lakes PUD/DRI depicted on Exhibit A-1 to have a maximum height of 13 feet above the lowest center grade of the roadway adjacent to the sign location, rather than 8 feet as limited in the LDC.1 C. Deviation #3 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.02.03.A, which requires accessory structures to be constructed simultaneously with or following the construction of the principal structure, to instead allow accessory structures to be constructed prior to construction of the principal structure. This deviation shall apply only to the two (2) accessory tower structures at the location depicted on Exhibit C-1, "Tower Locations," and further shown on Exhibit C-2, "Tower Renderings."2 D. Deviation #4 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.04.G.2.a, which allows for a maximum sign area of 12 square feet for off -premises directional signs, to allow for a maximum sign area of 64 square feet for the proposed temporary off -premises directional sign as depicted in Exhibit D-1 and referenced by Section 2.6.0 of the MPUD document. 3 E. Deviation #5 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.04.G.2.b, which allows for a maximum sign height of 8 feet for off -premises signs, to allow for a maximum sign height of 10 feet for the proposed off -premises sign as depicted in Exhibit D-1 and referenced by Section 2.6.0 of the MPUD document. 3 F. Deviation #6 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.04.G.2.e, which requires off -premises directional signs to be located no more than 1,000 feet from the use for which the sign is displayed, to allow the proposed temporary off -premises directional sign to be located no more than 1,320+/- feet from the use for which the sign is displayed as depicted in Exhibit D-1 and referenced by Section 2.6.0 of the MPUD document.3 G. Deviation #7 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.C, which allows for a maximum fence and wall height of 6 feet for residential zoning districts, to allow for a maximum fence and wall height of 8 feet around the multi -family residential portion on the C/MU (1) tract shown on the Hammock Park PUD master plan subject to approval from FPL and Collier County Public Utilities Department, where applicable.4 H. Deviation #8 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.05.04.G. Table 17. which reauires barking for a multitenant commercial building„ not meeting the LDC shopping center threshold, to be calculated based on the square footage of each use, to instead allow the parkin Hammock Park MPUD — PDI-PL2024000077 Last Revised: April 17, 202 Words underlined are added; words stFuek thr-eugk are deleted Packet Pg. 258 3.C.d multitenant commercial buildiniz a minimum of 7 tenants/units and a minimum floor area of at least 15,000 square feet to be calculated as a Shopping center (e.g., at least 1 space per 250 square feet), pursuant and subject to LDC Section 4.05.04.G, Table 17, Shopping centers.' 1. Approved in HEX decision 2014-28. 2. Approved in HEX decision 2016-42. 3 Pending approval per- nr 2020000 9c- Approved in HEX decision 2021-36. 4. Approved in HEX decision 2021-46 5. Pending approval per PL20240000770 Hammock Park MPUD — PDI-PL2024000077 Last Revised: April 17, 202 Words underlined are added; words stFuek thr-eugk are deleted Packet Pg. 259 3.C.d ORDINANCE 2020-039 HAMMOCK PARK MPUD PDI-PL20240000770 0 a_ 0 a L a 0 E E Cu 0 0 0 0 0 N O N J d w 00 00 00 N N R �L CR G Q ci R m m ci .Q Q :� U Packet Pg. 260 3.C.d ORDINANCE NO.20- 3 9 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 07-30, THE HAMMOCK PARK COMMERCE CENTRE COMMERCIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (CPUD), TO ALLOW UP TO 265 MULTI -FAMILY RENTAL DWELLING UNITS PLUS 80,000 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO 160,000 SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL AND OFFICE CURRENTLY ALLOWED; BY CHANGING THE NAME OF THE CPUD FROM HAMMOCK PARK COMMERCE CENTRE TO THE HAMMOCK PARK MIXED -USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (MPUD); BY REVISING THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS; BY AMENDING THE MASTER PLAN AND REVISING DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK ROAD AND COLLIER BOULEVARD IN SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 19.13f ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PL20180002813] WHEREAS, WILTON LAND COMPANY LLC, represented by Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. and Alexis Crespo, AICP of Waldrop Engineering, P.A., petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to amend the CPUD and change the zoning classification of the additional herein described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: Zoning Classification. The PUD Document attached to Ordinance No. 07-30, is hereby amended for a 19± acre project to be now known as the Hammock Park Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development in accordance with the revised MPUD Document, attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. SECTION TWO: Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State and on the date that the Growth Management Plan Amendment in Ordinance No. 20-38 becomes effective. [I 9-CPS-0 1859/1575267/ 11169 Hammock Park\PL20180002813 Pagel of 2 10/21/20 Packet Pg. 261 3.C.d PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super -majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this day of Och 6�,r , 2020. ATTEST: CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK By: er lerk Attesf`a fa C i n S sit�naiur�.only: Approved as to form and legality: 4idi ton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney Attachments: Exhibit A - PUD Document [ 19-CPS-01859/1575267/11169 Hammock Park\ P1.,20180002813 10/21 /20 Page 2 of 2 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: Burt L. Saunders, Chairman This ordinance filed with the nary of S te's Office the day of�Z and ocknowledgeme that fili g receive this day of 61 sy r a E z U M Q� Packet Pg. 262 3.C.d PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DOCUMENT FOR .. .. . .. ..ANTP17M. GMP UD A GONWERC MIXED USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Prepared by: T"1►T W- T a Ivt_ "YN-:St'l, I'1Af,; -L. %, ! Tj JL • Phirmivrf , vl,"i"lfnr t'rve[ [�11;in-rrml • Snr,tving & tlapperr1 REVISED BY: HOLE r, ONTEe, PX; 950 ENCORE W AV NAP Ece FLORIDA 341W WALDROP ENGINEERING, P.A. 28100 BONITA GRANDE DR. #305 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135 AND COLEMAN. YOVANOVICH AND KOESTER, P.A. 4001 TAMIAMI TRAIL, SUITE 300 NAPLES, FL 34102 Hammock Park MPUD — PUDA-PL20180002F Last Revised: October 21, 2( Page 1 of Packet Pg. 263 3.C.d HAMMOCK PARK CONWEDGE CENTRE EMPUD TABLE OF CONTENTS STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE SECTION I Property Ownership & Description SECTION II Project Development SECTION III Eommunit-y Commercial- Mixed Use D+st-riet SECTION IV Preserve Area SECTION V General Development Commitments SECTION VI Requested Deviations from the LDC'- LIST OF EXHIBITS EXHIBIT "A" PUD Master Plan EXHIBIT "A-1" Off -Premises Directional Sign Location i EXHIBIT "C-1" Tower Locations z EXHIBIT "C-2" Tower Renderings 2 1. Approved in HEX decision 2014-28. 2. Approved in HEX decision 2016-42. Hammock Park MPUD — PUDA-PL20180002f Last Revised: October 21, 2( Page 2 of Packet Pg. 264 3.C.d STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE The development of approximately 20.23 19.13+/- acres of property in Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, as a Commer-eial Mixed Use Planned Unit Development to be known as Hammock Park G,....,mefee Gentr-e EMPUD will be in compliance with the planning goals and objectives of Collier County as set forth in the Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP). The retail commercial., a*4 office facilities and multi -family apartment development of the Hammock Park C,.Y...mer-ee Gef t~e EMPUD will be consistent with the growth policies, land development regulations, and applicable comprehensive planning objectives for the following reasons: The subject property is located within the northeast quadrant of the CR 95 1 /Rattlesnake Hammock Road Mixed Use Activity Center Land Use Designation as identified on the Future Land Use Map. The permitted uses are described in the Activity Center Sub -district of the Urban - Commercial District in the Future Land Use Element (FLUE). This category described in the FLUE permits a full mix of residential and non-residential land uses in this area. This strategic location allows the site superior access for the location of retail commercial and office land uses, and multi -family apartment development. 2. The subject property's location in relation to existing or proposed community facilities and services permits the development's intensity of land use as required in Objective 2 of the FLUE. 3. The project development is compatible with and complementary to existing and future surrounding land uses as required in Policy 5.4-6 of the FLUE. 4. The project shall be in compliance with all applicable County regulations including the GMP. 5. All final development orders for this project are subject to the Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, Code of Laws , as amended; as Set f ,.th in pelf y 3.1 f the F T it 6. The project has access from both CR 951 and Rattlesnake Hammock Road. Further, the access points will be consistent with the adopted Access Management Plan for Mixed Use Activity Center #7, which encourages shared access points along CR 951, and is further described in Policy 4.4 of the FLUE. 7. Where possible, Hammock Park C,,.. mere. Geatr-e will incorporate natural systems for water management in accordance with their natural functions and capabilities as may be required by Objective 1.5 of the Drainage Sub -Element of the Public Facilities Element. The project will be served by a complete range of services and utilities as approved by the County Hammock Park MPUD — PUDA-PL20180002f Last Revised: October 21, 2( Page 3 of Packet Pg. 265 3.C.d SECTION I PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND DESCRIPTION 1.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the location and ownership of the property, and to describe the existing conditions of the property proposed to be developed under the name of Hammock Park Commer-ee Centre GMPUD. 1.2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION >J ♦ Collier- County, L'lefi.1., being more aftieular-ly ,10.,,.ribed as f 11, ws- n v >I 573 Page 355 The AT fth one half (N V2) f the South , e half (S 1 ) of the Southwest one .,.-to.• (SW 1,14) of the Southwest one quafter (SW 1,14) less the West 100 feet of readway for Count-Y Read-951Seetien 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East Collier County Florid and South, Range 26 Ea , ,-age., 1667 The South 1/2 ef the South !Q of the Southwest i/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Seetion 14, Township 50 Sout4, Range 26 East, Collier- Caunt-y, Florida, less the west 100 feet ther- South Half (Sl/2) of the Southwest Quarter (SWI/4) of the Southwest Quarter (SWI/4) of Section 14 Township 50 South Range 26 East Collier County, Florida, LESS the West 100 feet and LESS the land described in Warranty Deed filed in Official Records Book 4336 page 3681 of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. and The West Eiehty feet (80') of the South Half (Sl/2) of the Southeast Quarter (SE1/4) of the Southwest Quarter (SWI/4) of Section 14 Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier Countv. Florida. LESS the land described in Warranty Deed filed in Official Records Book 4336 page 3681 of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Containing 20.2319.13 acres, more or less. Subject to easements, reservations or restrictions of record. Hammock Park MPUD — PUDA-PL201800021 Last Revised: October 21, 21 Page 4 of Packet Pg. 266 3.C.d 1.3 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP The subject property is currently owned by Wilton Land Company, LLC Sembler F iT,: P--at4nership #47 Ltd 1.4 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY AREA A. The subject property is located at the northeast quadrant of the intersection of Rattlesnake Hammock Road and CR 951 of unincorporated Collier County, Florida. The subject property is located within a Mixed Use Activity Center as designated on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM). B. The property is currently vacant. The entire site has Hammock Park C^„,w eFee Ge tFe MPUD Zoning. 1.5 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Hammock Park C v,.,me fee Gentfe CMPUD will include a mixture of land uses for retail commercial., a d office and multi-familyapartment land uses. The Hammock Park Commerce Centro GMPUD intends to establish guidelines and standards to ensure a high and consistent level of quality for proposed features and facilities. Uniform guidelines and standards will be created for such features and facilities as landscaping, signage, lighting, roadway treatments, fences and buffers. The Concept Plan is illustrated graphically on Exhibit "A", GMPUD Master Plan. A Land 1.6 SHORT TITLE This Ordinance shall be known and cited as the "Hammock Park C,.w.m eFee Cent~o Gemm6 Mixed Use Planned Unit Development Ordinance" Hammock Park MPUD — PUDA-PL2018000 Last Revised: October 21, 21 Page 5 of Packet Pg. 267 3.C.d SECTION II PROJECT DEVELOPMENT 2.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to delineate and generally describe the project plan of development, relationships to applicable County ordinances, the respective land uses of the tracts included in the project, as well as other project relationships. 2.2 GENERAL A. Regulations for development of the Hammock Park Commer-^e Gentr- GMPUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this Document, EMPUD - Gemof Mixed Use Planned Unit Development District, applicable sections and parts of the LDC and GMP in effect at the time of site development plan approval final leeal development ercdef—of building pefmit applieation. Where these regulations fail to provide developmental standards, then the provisions of the most similar district in the LDC shall apply. B. Unless otherwise noted, the definitions of all terms shall be the same as the definitions set forth in the LDC in effect at the date of adoption of this PUD. C. All conditions imposed and graphic material presented depicting restrictions for the development of the Hammock Park Commer-^e roa+r-o GMPUD shall become part of the regulations that govern the manner in which the EMPUD site may be developed. D. Unless specifically waived through any variance or waiver provisions from any other applicable regulations, the provisions of those regulations not otherwise provided for this EMPUD remain in full force and effect. 2.3 PROJECT PLAN AND PROPOSED LAND USES A. The project Master Plan is illustrated graphically by Exhibit "A", EMPUD Master Plan. B. Minor modifications to Exhibit "A" may be permitted at the time of Site Development Plan approval, subject to the provisions of the LDC, as amended, or as otherwise permitted by this EMPUD Document. C. In addition to the various areas and specific items shown in Exhibit "A", easements (such as utility, private and semi-public) shall be established and/or vacated within or along the properly, as may be necessary. Hammock Park MPUD — PUDA-PL201800021 Last Revised: October 21, 2( Page 6 of Packet Pg. 268 3.C.d 2.4 LAND USE A. Exhibit "A", EMPUD Master Plan, constitutes the required EMPUD Development Plan. Except as otherwise provided within this EMPUD Document, any division of the property and the development of the land shall be in compliance with the subdivision regulations and the platting laws of the State of Florida. B. Appropriate instruments will be provided at the time of infrastructure improvements regarding any dedications and the methodology for providing perpetual maintenance of common facilities. 2.5 NATIVE VEGETATION RETENTION REQUIREMENTS Pursuant to the LDC, as amended, 15% of the native vegetation on site shall be retained. The exact boundaries of the preserve may vary in order to accommodate final alignment of Rattlesnake Hammock Extension but a minimum of 1.63 acres of native preserve shall be provided for in accordance with the LDC. 2.6 SIGNS Signs shall be in accordance with the LDC, as amended except as provided herein and under Section 6.1. "Sign Deviations."I A. One (1) off -premises directional sign for the Hacienda Lakes PUD/DRI shall be permitted in the northeast quadrant of the intersection of C.R. 951 and Rattlesnake Hammock Road, as depicted and labeled per Exhibit A- 1. This off -premises sign shall be allowed in addition to other signage allowed by the LDC. The off -premises sign shall contain only the name of the overall project and the insignia or motto of the entire development. B. The off -premises directional sign for the Hacienda Lakes PUD/DRI shall be no greater than 13 feet in height, and total square footage of all sign copy areas (name of the project and insignias or mottos) shall not exceed 38 square feet (see Deviations #1 and #2 under Section 6.1. "Sign Deviations").! 1. Approved in HEX decision 2014-28. Hammock Park MPUD — PUDA-PL20180002f Last Revised: October 21, 2( Page 7 of Packet Pg. 269 3.C.d SECTION III COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL -MIXED USE DISTRICT 3.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this section is to identify permitted uses and development standards for areas within the Hammock Park ram,,... mere. Gentfe C'MPUD designated on Exhibit "A", GMPUD Master Plan as C/MU, "Commercial/Mixed Use". 3.2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION A. There is one area designated as C/MU, "Commercial/Mixed Use" on the Master Plan. This "Commercial/Mixed Use" area is intended to accommodate different ranges of retail and office uses, multi -family rental dwelling units, essential services, and customary accessory uses. A maximum of 80,000 square feet of commercial plus 265 multi -family rental residential dwelling units, or 160,000 square feet commercial only shall be permitted in the locations depicted on Exhibit `A' PUD Master Plan. All uses are subject to the trip cap in Section 5.5.N. B. The approximate acreage of the "Commercial/Mixed Use" parcel is as follows: Parcel: Acreage: Use: Tract 1 19.1395± Retail/aa+dOffice/Multi-Family Right-of-way outside of development area 1.18± Right-of-way Total 19.1324.-2-3t Actual acreage of all development tracts will be provided at the time of Site Development Plan r Preli..,inaFy Subdivision PW approvals in accordance with the LDC, as amended. Commercial/Mixed Use tracts are designed to accommodate internal roadways, open spaces, lakes, water management facilities, and other similar uses. C. Within the Hammock Park Gomme~^e Gan*ro GMPUD, up to a maximum of one hundred sixty thousand (160,000) square feet of retail and office uses are allowed subject to Section 3.2.A. Land uses for the development may be permitted as generally outlined below and suJect to the trip cap in Section 5.5.N. 3.3 PERMITTED USES AND STRUCTURES No building or structure or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Permitted Principal Uses and Structures Amusement and recreation services, Indoor only (Groups 7911-7941, 7991, 7993, Hammock Park MPUD — PUDA-PL201800021 Last Revised: October 21, 2( Page 8 of Packet Pg. 270 3.C.d 7997, 7999) 2. Apparel and accessory stores (Groups 5611, 5621, 5631, 5641, 5651, 5661, 5699) 3. Automotive repair, services and parking (Groups 7514, 7542) All uses are prohibited within 500 feet from the easterly right-of-way line of C.R. 951. 4. Auto and home supply stores (Group 5531) 5. Building construction - general contractors (groups 1521-1542). 6. Building materials, hardware, garden supply (Groups 5231, 5251, 5261) 7. Business services (Groups 7311, 7323, 7334, 7335, 7336, 7338, 7352, 7359, 7371-7379, 7384, 7389) 8. Communications (Groups 4832, 4833) 9. Construction - special trade contractors (Groups 1711-1793, 1796, 1799) 10. Depository institutions (Groups 6011-6099) 11. Eating and drinking places (Groups 5812, 5813 except contract feeding, food service and industrial feeding) 12. Engineering, accounting and management (Groups 8711-8721, 8741, 8742, 8748) 13. Food stores (Groups 5411, 5421, 5441, 5451, 5461, 5499) 14. Funeral service and crematories (Group 7261) 15. Gasoline service stations (5541 subject to the provisions of the LDC) 16. General merchandise stores (Groups 5311, 5331, 5399) 17. Hardware stores (5251) 18. Health services (Groups 8011-8059) 19. Home furniture, furnishings, and equipment stores (Groups 5712, 5713, 5714, 5719,5722,5731,5734,5735,5736) 20. Hospitals (Group 8062) 21. Hotels and motels (Group 7011) 22. Insurance agents, brokers and service (Group 6411) Hammock Park MPUD — PUDA-PL201800021 Last Revised: October 21, 21 Page 9 of Packet Pg. 271 3.C.d 23. Membership organizations (Groups 8641, 8661) 24. Miscellaneous repair services (Groups 7622, 7623, 7629, 7631, 7641) (Group 7699 with approval of County Manager, or his designee, who shall be guided by the objective of allowing uses that are compatible with existing development.) All uses are prohibited within 500 feet of the easterly right -of- way line of C.R. 951. 25. Miscellaneous retail (Groups 5912, 5921, 5932, 5941-5949, 5984, 5992, 5993, 5999) 26. Motion pictures (Groups 7832-7833) 27. Museum, art galleries (Group 8412) 28. Multi -family rental dwelling units. 29-9. Non -depository credit institutions (Groups 6141, 6159, 6162, 6163) 2430. Offices (All Groups) 310. Personal services (Groups 7211-7212, 7215, 7219, 7221, 7231, 7241, 7251, 7291) 32-. Restaurants (All Groups) 3-23. Real estate (Groups 6531, 6541, 6552) 3-34.Social services (Group 8351) 345.United States Postal Service (Group 4311) 366. Veterinarian's office (Group 0742, except no outside kenneling) 367. Any other use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses may be permitted subject to the procedures set forth in the LDC, as amended. 3.4 ACCESSORY USES AND STRUCTURES A. Uses and structures that are accessory and incidental to uses permitted. B. Any other accessory use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses may be permitted subject to the procedures set forth in the LDC, as amended. 3.5 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS (COMMERCIAL) A. Minimum lot area: Ten thousand (10,000) square feet. Hammock Park MPUD — PUDA-PL20180002i Last Revised: October 21, 2( Page 10 of Packet Pg. 272 3.C.d B. Minimum lot width: One hundred (100) feet. C. Minimum yard requirements: 1. Front yard: Twenty-five (25) feet. 2. Side yard: Zero for common or abutting walls, otherwise one-half the height of the building, but not less than ten (10) feet. 3. Rear yard: Twenty (20) feet. 4 Preserve: Twenty-five (25) feet (Principal) Ten (10) feet (Accessory) D. Distance between principal structures: The distance between any two principal structures on the same parcel shall be fifteen (15) feet or a distance equal to one half the sum of their heights, whichever is greater. E. Minimum floor area of principal structure: Seven hundred (700) square feet per building on the ground floor. F. Landscaping and off-street parking shall be in accordance with the LDC, as amended G. Maximum height: Fifty (50) feet. H. General application for setbacks: Front yard setbacks shall comply with the following: 1. If the parcel is served by a public or private right-of-way, the setback is measured from the adjacent right-of-way line. 2. If the parcel is served by a non -platted private drive, the setback is measured from the back of curb or edge of pavement. 3. If the parcel is served by a platted private drive, the setback is measured from the road easement or property line. I. All buildings, landscaping and visible infrastructures shall be architecturally and aesthetically unified. Said unified architectural theme shall include a similar architectural design and similar use of materials and colors on all of the buildings to be erected on site. Landscaping and streetscape materials shall also be similar in design throughout the site. A conceptual landscape plan for the entire site shall be submitted concurrent with the first application for site development plan approval. J. Outside storage or display of merchandise is prohibited unless it is ancillary to a permitted use and screened from view from adjacent public roadways. Outside storage may be approved by the County Manager, or his designee, as part of the approval of an SDP. K. The FP&L easement may be used for ancillary uses such as parking, storage, service drives, Hammock Park MPUD — PUDA-PL20180002f Last Revised: October 21, 2( Page 11 of Packet Pg. 273 3.C.d and water management, provided written authorization for those uses is obtained from FP&L and submitted with the application for SDP. L. The two accessory tower structures described in Deviation 3 shall have a minimum PUD perimeter setback of ten (10) feet, and a maximum actual height of thirty (30) feet for the southern tower and maximum actual height of fifteen (15) feet for the northern most tower.i (1) Approved in HEX decision 2016-42. 3.6 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS (RESIDENTIAL) PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES MULTI -FAMILY Min. Lot Area 1 acre Min. Lot Width N/A Min. Lot Depth N/A Front Yard(') 10 feet Side Yard 5 feet Min. Lake Maintenance Easement Tract Setback 0 feet Min. Setback from FPL Easement 0 feet Min. PUD Boundary Setback, excluding boundary abutting 25 feet FPL Easement Min. Distance Between Buildings 20 feet Rear Yard 10 feet Preserve 25 feet MAXIMUM HEIGHT Actual Zoned 60 feet 50 feet ACCESSORY STRUCTURES Front Yard SPS Side Yard SPS Rear Yard 5 feet Preserve 10 feet MAXIMUM HEIGHT Actual Zoned SPS SPS Footnotes: (1) Front setback is measured from the edge of pavement or back of curb except for public roads. GENERAL: Except as provided for herein all criteria set forth below shall be understood to be in relation to individual parcel or lot boundary lines or between structures Property owners' association boundaries shall not be utilized for determining development standards. Hammock Park MPUD — PUDA-PL20180002f Last Revised: October 21, 2( Page 12 of _ Packet Pg. 274 3.C.d SECTION IV PRESERVE AREA 4.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the development plan for areas designated as Preserve Area on Exhibit "A", GMPUD Master Plan. The primary function and purpose of this Tract is to preserve and protect vegetation and naturally functioning habitats, such as wetlands, including upland buffers, in their natural, and/or enhanced state. 4.2 USES PERMITTED No building or structure or part thereof, shall be erected altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following, subject to the issuance of regional, state and federal permits, when required: A. Permitted Principal Uses: 1) Na4*re-p1!reserves. B. Accessory Uses: 1) Water management structures. 2) Mitigation areas. 3) Hiking trails, boardwalks, shelters, or other such facilities constructed for the purposes of passage through or enjoyment of the site's natural attributes, subject to approval by the appropriate permitting agencies. Hammock Park MPUD — PUDA-PL20180002� Last Revised: October 21, 2( Page 13 of _ Packet Pg. 275 3.C.d SECTION V GENERAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS 5.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the standards for development of the project. 5.2 GENERAL A. All facilities shall be constructed in strict accordance with the Final Site Development Plans, Final Subdivision Pla4s, and all applicable State and local laws, codes, and regulations applicable to this GMPUD. Except where specifically noted or stated otherwise, the standards and specifications of the LDC, as amended, shall apply to this project even if the land within the EMPUD is not to be platted. B. The develepef, his sueeessef and assi ns, outlined in this Doeumertx. The developer-, his sueeesser- and assigns, shall fellew the stieeesser- ef assigns of the developef afe bound by the eaflifnitments within this egfeement. One entity(hereinafterthe Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close-out of the PUD and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this PUD approval the Managing Entity is the Wilton Land Company, LLC. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts the Managing Entityshall hall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing_ Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section When the PUD is closed -out then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments. C. Pursuant to Section 125.022(5) F S issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. D. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development. Hammock Park MPUD — PUDA-PL20180002f Last Revised: October 21, 2( Page 14 of . Packet Pg. 276 3.C.d E. A recorded and documented notification to residential renters or owners will be provided in all contracts to purchasers renters or leases regarding the location of the Swamp Buggy Grounds. 5.3 PUD MASTER PLAN A. Exhibit "A", CMPUD Master Plan illustrates the proposed development and is conceptual in nature. Proposed area, lot or land use boundaries or special land use boundaries shall not be construed to be final and may be varied at any subsequent approval phase such as final pleAting site development plan approval. Subject to the provisions of the LDC, amendments may be made from time to time. B. All necessary easements, dedications or other instruments shall be granted to ensure the continued operation and maintenance of all sewer utilities and all common areas in the project. 5.4 WATER MANAGEMENT A. Excavation permits shall be required for the proposed lakes in accordance with the LDC, as amended. Excavated material from the property is intended to be used within the project site. B. Detailed paving, grading and site drainage plans shall be submitted to Engineering Review Services staff for review. No construction permits shall be issued unless and until approval of the proposed construction in accordance with the submitted plans is granted by Engineering Review Services. C. In accordance with the Rules of the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), Chapters 40E-4 and 40E-40, this project shall be designed for a storm event of 3-day duration and 25-year frequency. D. The proposed stormwater management system for the project will outfall to the existing drainage canal running along the site's western boundary line. Commitment Completed 5.5 TRANSPORTATION A. The developer shall provide a fair share payment toward the capital improvements at the intersection of CR 951 and Rattlesnake Hammock Road. This shall occur at the time of first Certificate of Occupancy B. E The project entry from CR 951 shall be located at the northwest comer of the property and designed to provide shared access with the parcel to the north. All necessary dedications and easements shall be provided with the application for first development order. C. D: Following zoning approval, interconnections as shown on the Master Plan shall be designed Hammock Park MPUD — PUDA-PL201800021 Last Revised: October 21, 2( Page 15 of Packet Pg. 277 3.C.d and accommodated on the appropriate development order phase that may occur, or as directed by the Transportation Division. C • a fequested by Collier County. � IL 2 F. All leea4iens shall be in aeeefdanee with the Collier- Geuf4y Aeeess proposed median opening L LPG, it be Management Paliey (Resalkition No. 01 247), as it may be amended, Mid the as ffia�, IL Collier Getinty resefves the right to medify or elese an), fnedian epening existing at th amended. 0 E E h 0 • Neithef shall the existenee of a point of ingress,a peiiit ef egfesso 0 damages against the Geun�y by the o 0 ' its sueeessef in title, or- assignee. All e)i4efna4 aeeess N ' ifieluding both ' ' N J IL 0 0 development eFders. The numbef of aeeess poifits may be less th the number- depiested an the 0 Mastef Plan; howevef, no additional extefnal aeeess points shall be eensider-ed tinless a PUD N .7 ♦ P D insubstantial ♦ ♦ial ..han p N nrrr��a�'rrricrn�Tv�-rrraavaruir .,.....b:. ,., .�..1:.Y.., ..,.-. � 2 D. H-. If, in the sole opinion of Collier County, a traffic signal, or other traffic control device, sign or pavement marking improvement within a public right-of-way or easement is determined to be necessary, the cost of such improvement shall be borne by the developer Y and shall be paid to Collier County before the issuance of the first CO or within 60 days of 0 when requested by the County. m c 0 E. t- Payment in lieu of sidewalks and bike lanes for Collier Boulevard frontage shall be required. The amount shall be determined utilizing the FDOT 2004 Transportation Costs, as amended. Payment 2 shall be required within 60 days of written request of Collier County, or prior to site development n plan , whichever is first. Q v F. -J-. At the request of Collier County, the developer shall install or make payment in lieu of construction, _ at the discretion of the County, for a Collier Area Transit (CAT) bus stop with shelter. The exact E location shall be determined during site development plan review. M G. K-. The developer shall convey right-of-way along the project's south property line for the future Q extension of Rattlesnake Hammock Road. The required right-of-way shall be determined by Collier County. The dedications shall be provided no later than the earlier of (1) first issuance of the first certificate of occupancy with respect to this Development, or (2) within 365 days of a written request from Collier County. The developer shall convey a marketable title free of any liens, m encumbrances, exceptions, or qualifications, excluding those applicable to subsurface mineral Q rights and/or natural gas deposits, existing FP&L and County easements, and any other existing easements for utilities and drainage. The County agrees to condemn the easements described in Items 7 and 11 on Exhibit A, EMPUD Master Plan, if necessary, to obtain termination of such Hammock Park MPUD — PUDA-PL201800021 Last Revised: October 21, 2( Page 16 of _ Packet Pg. 278 3.C.d easements. Marketable title shall be determined according to applicable title standards adopted by the Florida Bar and in accordance with Florida law. Commitment Completed H. 1T The developer shall construct, at its sole expense, the canal crossing suitable for expansion and consistent with a four -lane design for the north half of the Rattlesnake Hammock future extension approach to CR 951. The canal crossing shall include all appropriate turn lanes. Commitment Completed I. M-. Should the developer permit a driveway on the Rattlesnake Hammock Road extension less than 600 feet from the intersection of Collier Boulevard, the County, at its sole discretion, may reduce the access point to a "right in" only if the County determines that the access point has an impact on health, safety, and welfare or traffic circulation. This reduction, if required, shall be at the developer's expense with no claim for damages to the County. Commitment Completed J. The maximum total daily trig generation for the PUD shall not exceed 577 two-way PM peak hour net trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA approval. K. Bridges providing pedestrian or vehicular traffic to the project will be brought (if existing) to County standards by the petitioner (Wilton Land Company LLC) or its successor at a time of Site Development Plan approval Unless County establishes a funding mechanism or County otherwise agrees owner as shown on the right -of -way -permit shall own and maintain the bridges that provide vehicular or pedestrian access to the MPUD. 5.6 UTILITIES A. Water distribution, sewage collection and transmission facilities to serve the project are to be designed, constructed, conveyed, owned and maintained in accordance with applicable Collier County Ordinance and other applicable County rules and regulations. B. Downstream wastewater Vstem capacity is available for a commercial only project. Downstream wastewater system capacity must be confirmed at the time of development permit (SDP) review for a mixed use project The capacity for a mixed -use project will be discussed at a mandatory pre -submittal conference with representatives from the Public Utilities Engineering and Project Management Division and the Growth Management Development Review Division. Anv improvements to the Collier County Water -Sewer District's wastewater collection/transmission system necessary to provide sufficient capacity to serve a mixed -use project will be the responsibility of the developer to design, Wrmit and construct and will be conveyed to the Collier County Water -Sewer District at no cost to the County at the time of utilities acceptance. 5.7 ENGINEERING A. Except as otherwise provided within this GMPUD Document, this project shall be required to meet all County ordinances in effect at the time final construction documents are submitted for development approval. Hammock Park MPUD - PUDA-PL201800021 Last Revised: October 21, 2( Page 17 of Packet Pg. 279 3.C.d B. The subdivision of property into three (3) or more parcels, shall conform with applicable laws pertaining to platting. 5.8 BUFFERS The Hammock Park GMPUD shall provide perimeter buffering consistent with the following table: Direction Adjacent Use Buffer Type North: Vacant ^ ,...idle"a"iz Mixed Use zen " " PER LDC AT TIME OF SDP OR PLAT South: Rattlesnake Hammock/Sports Park Rd. P- PER LDC AT TIME OF SDP OR PLA" East: Vacant Agfietihur-all�,_Mixed Use Zoned hand mo-' PER LDC AT TIME OF SDP OR PLAT West: CR 951 and canal "U" PER LDC AT TIME OF SDP OR PLAT 5.9 ENVIRONMENTAL A. The developer shall comply with the guidelines and recommendations of the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) regarding potential impacts to protected wildlife species. Where protected species are observed on site, a Habitat Management Plan for those protected species shall be submitted to Environmental Services Department Staff for review and approval prior to final site plan/construction plan approval. B. An exotic vegetation removal, monitoring, and maintenance (exotic -free) plan for the site, with emphasis on the conservation/preservation areas, shall be submitted to Environmental Services Department Staff for review and approval prior to final site plan/construction plan approval. D:C. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) addressing existing conditions and anticipated environmental impact(s) has been submitted as part of this EMPUD Document. I-D. All Category I invasive exotic plants, as defined by the Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council shall be removed from within the preserve areas and subsequent annual removal of these plants, in perpetuity, shall be the responsibility of the property owner. F-.E. A Preserve Management Plan shall be provided to Environmental Services Staff for approval prior to site/construction plan approval identifying methods to address treatment of invasive exotic species, fire management, and maintenance. Hammock Park MPUD - PUDA-PL201800021 Last Revised: October 21, 2( Page 18 of Packet Pg. 280 3.C.d F. The subject site will rovide 1.63 acres of native vegetation preserve. The native vegetation preservation requirement will be satisfied on -site in accordance with the Land Development Code Any replanting of native vegetation to meet preserve standards shall comply with all requirements set forth in LDC Section 3.05.07.H. G. Existing vegetation in the conservation easement along the east may be used to satisfy the landscape buffer requirements after exotic vegetation removal in accordance with LDC sections 4 06 02 and 4 06 05 E 1 Supplemental plantings with native plant materials shall be in accordance with LDC section 3 05 07 In the event that a Type "B" buffer is required along the east boundary, a minimum 6-foot-wide reservation located outside of the existing vegetation in the conservation easement along the east will be conveyed by owner to a homeowner's association, property owner's association or condominium association at time of SDP approval. In the event that the existing vegetation in the conservation easement along the east does not meet the buffer requirement after removal of exotics and supplemental planting in accordance with LDC Section 3 05 07 the owner will install landscgpe material in the reservation to meet the buffer requirements. H. Prior to the initiation of construction activities the developer will coordinate with Collier County and the USFWS with respect to the bald eagle nest regarding applicable guidelines and permitting requirements as described in the USFWS National Bald Eagle Management Guidelines (USFWS 2007 . 5.10 MISCELLANEOUS A. Developer shall make 48 units available for rent for Essential Service Personnel (ESP) only. A minimum of 27 of the 48 units will be income restricted to households earning 100% of Collier County's median income The income -restricted units will be offered for rent for a period of 30 years to ESP persons in the amount of the most current Collier County Board -approved Table of Rental Rates that establish the rental limits for the low-income category based on the number of bedrooms in the unit. B. The development is required to provide a minimum of 20,000 square feet of commercial uses, of which a minimum of 5,000 square feet shall be dedicated to Eating and Drinking Places, Sit Down/Quality Restaurants only (SIC 5812) A certificate of occupancy must be issued on a 5,000 SF restaurant prior to issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for the multi -family rental dwelling units. C. Storage Facilities such as mini -storage or self -storage shall be prohibited from this MPUD. D. One (1) Transfer of Development Right (TDR) per acre shall be required. Hammock Park MPUD — PUDA-PL20180002f 0 ti 0 0 0 0 N 0 N J a w 0 0 0 N- A 2 a 0 Y 0 m c 0 M a zo L Q Last Revised: October 21, 2( Page 19 of _ Packet Pg. 281 3.C.d SECTION VIr- REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM THE LDC! 6.1 DEVIATIONSi A. Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.04.G.2.a to allow the off -premises directional sign for the Hacienda Lakes P1JD/DRl depicted on Exhibit A-1 to have a maximum of 38 square feet in sign area (total square footage of all sign copy areas, including the name of the project and insignias or mottos), rather than 12 square feet as limited in the LDC.1 B. Deviation 92 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.04.G.2.b to allow the off -premises directional sign for the Hacienda Lakes PUD/DRI depicted on Exhibit A-1 to have anaximum height of 13 feet above the lowest center grade of the roadway adjacent to the sign location, rather than 8 feet as limited in the LDC.1 C. Deviation #3 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.02.03.A, which requires accessory structures to be constructed simultaneously with or following the construction of the principal structure, to instead allow accessory structures to be constructed prior to construction of the principal structure. This deviation shall apply only to the two (2) accessory tower structures at the location depicted on Exhibit C-1, "Tower Locations," and further shown on Exhibit C-2, "Tower Renderings."2 1. Approved in HEX decision 2014-28. 2. Approved in HEX decision 2016-42. Hammock Park MPUD — PUDA-PL20180002f Last Revised: October 21, 2( Page 20 of _ Packet Pg. 282 3.C.d 15 FOREST COUNTRY CLUB PROJECT LOCATION SIERRA MEADOWS :Tli_ICT T, W E LAlb use stirLAw rA.cr ,Aw r T mwadY�1® yr —.L' FYI [AOO.rr lr ./- r[11ff Tr NOPK w./-Am '�ZLlJ �• .w,r v it e.vrmt ,.ef ./- m arms lEMC `i✓' wwO/To r.er drY6 ,(gj4l nmAet J p S"Ll PARM llfm a1i16 Orr v ,ta aifflric Nrc .on -err j'$(1 YAC1fY pYJ NOTES �M Q1a M1rwuO 1eS wl r A rw,Awl OI rKA wvu w: YL lI.O6 ari [a,Om rM 1 rr�E1tY.1S aRfAFli 1 M rt111p r VMV>LWD >rwt OR Mf V,a a M awl�lDG� Yo� mjp@1Wl w`�M „Y,aeoan awL r m.Ra .+ aMR >v ArrwY.r, v, La411UC,1�], N.116 r Mt nM.m.l e 010 II.rIDI OClaO M MoIVrD wel fi fAT1fyY¢ / Tru �F As--- I 7---rmmm = y ri I )0' f10RID1 PoIIiR � AND LC/!I CASCYEM --I �:. 7)WT C- _ I LGr�t J P' I fU1tAYE •� j � ryKLiLT I. LEGAL DESCR/PWN (AOIR swory Aw Llwr Am101 PwRm MILS Ofmomw A60= LY' LAW LAW i W f L - IGien! r xvm LLSF Or cou" Oa ffb! a lA iarei v x rrm eoerm N • rorr.rr r.re sreru Pr • A7� fatit+ii� s Frl v . n' x'rii r NwrL 1 � xYl fi/lrxr, rKfilrvrcr H/YrOri feYn i Crl LOIAiI mMh, Ilri� �x Rlf —,K% ea.ormvxf,/f ox:,�vtri s,hv„w.•sH mw fw.x ..� i FAti aadw mim, nArfA. 1,) ac�nr�.al a�rltcw[� o K .arts Ife�er.'."v �r� P-) on rm iaRRxllb omoa r orr >u rrA.r aerr. ewrwrwr m fiai >K mYrwam rri fiir,a f+ba waft r r x rr v Ivor v x riwfc i ra 1® a L.f.� i ICILAx • ilWir awipR N lYw r ,amf Nil r lawn mw1 N>A ets�i ww mmii ni a.o u�i ai lnR r.rn � r�� wax n iN-v-rw ear rmen v rot A Irrrrr a r r® r u m >r. Ifi rnl v K rxi icaa r mtw mrlT. awA Li m rwan : l+fp a rrt-a-wr riort r ra v nra Ioa r ,in mrrrc A am �rrirt Ooe� w as m LOw IAr aAt Af wax n in-r�-r;Y �rf IrrR v i71 A IO A O" CO V Ya 00[ rt fM. O x NOC f� v m"w mrll na♦a pe 1v rAfra fD 1. Iq[lYt fAxaf r .fMFV-r q O 110 !xa r Gl MN[ if Ii rRa r K wit � v ontil mwn• Ntia Irr O •rIm A pYp l NOOn w iAOf r mtw 0rlr, NRfra i 1� Yalu r rYnr s®r es m fw, rr la r x wre ms v'6ata mirt nra Lr m r.wcn a Lib • treat . fAr r mta NArr wI Rfre -- — aIx Yard r Iarllr oewti a out m aibrAiF lq s x rxs ere P mlw am '. nra♦f N m Irm ,MD r fom w rAra r Nia Ifx1 r uan mw, • areA mrarr. ®rm ■ w m na RAr fa i tax n rrt-er-rr mar rmnrt v wa A xorer r r teem a aLL m an. Irt Iwo v x Nos ,®s r maw LrNRI rtrOa Irf m Tam � r f OIm n. s-Latrr FrrxT r frii r m`�v rao wwrl-v-ale Yale r a rule csf r mtn �fAroai r roof r uaro i si it w Rm r roar �m w i ire Nit DM r x NOr aab r mtw arawir. Rma i'R A IAwmf , /M f Cfq r dm aurreis aae b w tom .+ A OIMT r mrv,Anc frir i t rR too 1e 1 rrAiA,l x •---- Asrmra ru s AA riala. flAt fanrla n aae .oee R.Yn oor� s wo s.nc rA,rra easim r afffro ri ►a a x'fuc NAv oeoRxfv ' n!v farl wr w o Awiiwrn aria �[ IOferOi asa o >¢frr V I' I i j1 I� L i t W iO! YI. Yrr a LY .aNwN aC ri M A r R mO.= � (. 4--AC= I ; i � I " rx � tar G[ FJMM.'i art r A fulrr iC an ■ A tQr[r 6 v wrrr warnAccm IYnAli2a . CYWrli iw ttf. r.Y r ; L (raL)'w YZ rL _ ;; /eerw ). TOO) &52AY O- 200�. �_uit�ie� Pa.. _CwNne.se Cv -- ---- ---' --" ------ ------ rmr r wmw r IRux ufi nxr art I Iwm frQl GapprR r111Fv-r1 r R�iiir v rams ��y F a101tt dll ``T 1 , Y.Ywr arY etf.lm le !rl rr K IYIm R I[AarA w.s ti >v i arm a x rlaaaa ,m>< +or w ,w .o xw.r II 1 1 i (hrrl'f .ARm mn.r ii .ro Yri ..o EXHIBIT A G Pitl ie)en� 0001 fPW R.— A....0-- ._..f.I Oxumen+r-Fn F r uw.. Syr r+awi..IAnfs.s,rre SEMBLER FAMILY PARTNERSMP #42 HAMMOCK PARK COMMERCE CENTRE P`+�O Nyt MYH+r IF —otr m max L']'�FFp "" '^"^' IL Y.` 14 Nu.¢n>aam t Tnai r C CPUO MASTER PLAN E1HBIT A Y <4 a Y V O E E fC O ti O O O O CV O N J a 00 00 CD CV Packet Pg. 283 ICA NORTH Z I ' EXISTING 36" 79 a$ i4 f WATER MAIN CONSERVATION W ¢ jl EASEMENT W I i ACCESS EASEMENT OR5056, PG3544 Z i OR 4474, PG 1232 ZONING: MPUD BUFFER PER LDC OR 5705, PG148 EXISTING LAND USE: VACANT AT TIME OF Z< 11 } i } BUFFER PER LDC AT TIME (GOOD TURN CENTER MPUD) SDP OR PLAT W Y OF SDP OR PLAT FLU: URBAN RESIDENTIAL FRINGE scALH: I"=zoo'a v I { r MIXED USE ACTIVITY CENTER O 1 <. ? E EXIST1NcowER COUNTY ---------------------------- __________ ---+- 1 6'RESERVATION �----- ' M PRODUCTION WELL _ ________ ____ - --- ------ x x x � 'I (SEE NOTE 2) --Y---- JL i i i i t x m.. .� 1.63± AC I o I I I I I I ♦ I lD I :. I I IL i .,. i J{L i .•. i .•. i .•. i ..LL i .ILL i__JY_y--`i-_�-____ �_ __� II O I l 0' EXISTING USIDrALK ^ G z ZONING: PUD 04 I O v EXISTING LAND USE �+ N ZONING: PUD l i Q I F C EXISTING LAND USE: > 'I j w VACANT z N COMMERCIAL w rr'+I a (MCMULLEN PUD) J (NAPLES LAKES ( I w awi FLU: URBAN w Fi VILLAGE CENTER) DO Q I 1 " ZO W RESIDENTIAL EAL � W� Fa - FLU. URBAN I i Z C/M U I C/M U (1) L O O Q-1 F a� co RESIDENTIAL W U ' N m SUB -DISTRICT ..00 SUB -DISTRICT i � MIXED USE 00 XED MIUSE ACTIVITY O un T I ACTIVITY CENTER Fr�I W CENTER w I y \J EXISTING 12'�t I I 2 FORCE MAIN I I1 � i ii BUFFER PER LDC AT � i TIME OF SDP OR PLAT I BUFFER PER LDC AT xj Q i `TIME OF SDP OR PLAT — — -__ I s _ -. - EXISTING m 1 SIDEWALK --i � COLLIER COUNTY UTILITY EASEMENT RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RD OR 5201, PG2074 ti ° O OR 5201, PG2090 w w w w w R ______________________ —_ U U U U U __N _________________________________________ p ? j j 7 ! O O O O C ! U U U U U ZONING: PUD 1 LEGEND '' w fr w w w w V EXISTING LAND USE: ZONING: MPUD a a a a a a+ SIERRA MEADOWS EXISTING LAND USE: ¢ w w w w LL COMMERCIAL- { VACANT COM MERCIAL a> j j j j E RESIDENTIAL f (HACIENDA LAKES MPUD) INGRESS/ EGRESS w w w w a FLU: URBAN FLU: URBAN RESIDENTIAL a a a RESIDENTIAL i- f FRINGE SUB -DISTRICT MIXED V R SUB -DISTRICT I USE ACTIVITY CENTER > c Q MIXED USE i f PRESERVE ACTIVITY CENTER I j ? w rnm .rzm. az m FPLEASEMENT - DRY DETENTION I V --- TRACT LINE Q i SLT NUMdGK: 881-02-E SHLLI: i Packet Pg. 284 1 ' 71 SITE SUMMARY CATEGORY ACREAGE PERCENTAGE OF TOTALACREAGE PRESERVE 1.63 AC 8.52 % BUFFERS 1.31 AC 6.85 % FPL EASEMENT / DRY DETENTION 2.43 AC 12.70 % DEVELOPMENT TRACTS C/MU 8.02 AC 41.92 % PERVIOUS OPEN SPACE 5.74 AC 30.01 % TOTAL 19.13 AC 100.00 % LAND USE SUMMARY I 80,000 SF COMMERCIAL PLUS UP TO 265 DWELLING C/MU UNITS, OR 160,000 SF COMMERCIAL ONLY (1) RESIDENTIAL PERMITTED IN THIS AREA OPEN SPACE SUMMARY TOTAL REQUIRED (19.13 x 30%) 5.74 AC TOTAL PROVIDED 5.74 AC PRESERVE SUMMARY NATIVE PRESERVE REQUIRED: 1.63 AC NATIVE PRESERVE PROVIDED: 1.63 AC GENERALNOTES 1. THIS PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND IS SUBJECT TO MINOR MODIFICATION DUE TO AGENCY PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS. 2. PRESERVES MAY BE USED TO SATISFY THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS AFTER EXOTIC VEGETATION REMOVAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH LDC SECTIONS 4.06.02 AND 4.06.05.E.1. SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTINGS WITH NATIVE PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LDC SECTION 3.05.07. IN THE EVENT THAT A TYPE "B" BUFFER IS REQUIRED ALONG THE EAST BOUNDARY, A MINIMUM 6-FOOT-WIDE RESERVATION LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE PRESERVE WILL BE CONVEYED BY OWNER TO A HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, PROPERTY OWNER'S ASSOCIATION OR CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION AT TIME OF SDP APPROVAL. IN THE EVENT THAT THE PRESERVE DOES NOT MEET THE BUFFER REQUIREMENT AFTER REMOVAL OF EXOTICS AND SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING IN ACCORDANCE WITH LDC SECTION 3.05.07, THE OWNER WILL INSTALL LANDSCAPE MATERIAL IN THE RESERVATION TO MEET THE PLANT SIZE AND SPACING REQUIREMENTS OF THE BUFFER. 3. REFER TO THE BOUNDARY SURVEY FOR ALL EASEMENTS. W €€ gt z A-1 — Wh Y E U 8e E © � 2 0 ti Q � 0 � o 04 N O z N J a Q. m 000 0 00 aD Q � 0o c m O Z Z Z Z Z 2 Z� c 0 0 0 0 •— 0 0 0 o c c Q U U U U C: Z Z Z Z 2 Q 0 >0 0 0 0 0 c, U U U U C: W W W W LL a n o n n a+ o U o U c r W W W W LL N N w V >W >W >W >W LL � E cl� r a T NUMBEK: 881-02-E Packet Pg. 285 3.C.d Hh N 9 H161T AAl if I SE 20' BUFFER I ESMT. (TYP.) I I I SUBJECT � PROPERTY 100 CANAL R/W I F_ I ' PROPOSED HACIENDA LAKES OFF -PREMISES DIRECTIONAL SIGN 105 a 10' UTILITY I u — — — EASEMENT — I — -- L------— — — — — — — — — — - ... ..... .... .... ' ( 11.4' I � RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK ROAD 133' WIDE RIGHT-OF-WAY J a z a U 950 Enoon Wooyy Na�IOa F1. 34110 L Phonr. (23�� 254-2000 Flortdo Cort(fToate of 00mAuthorization No.1772 rP EXISTING HACIENDA LAKES BOUNDARY MARKER SIGN NDA LAKES UDIDRI I OFF -PREMISES DIRECTIONAL SIGN LOCATION 0 40 SCALE IN FEET a PROKa No. ocom RY : tiw. 2M4.04a DRAM BY t CAD FU NAME im E* Al DATE ; DHIBIT - MU as 4 Packet Pg. 286 3.C.d PREPARED FOR: HAMMOCK PARK MPUD EXHIBIT C-1 "TOWER LOCATIONS" NEENGINEERING ENGINEERING I PLANNING I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE WILTON LAND COMPANY, LLC 28100 BONITA GRANDE DMIVE - SURE 305 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135 P. 239-4057777 F: 239-405-7899 EMAIL: Info@waldmwndina.H—.... Packet Pg. 287 1 3.C.d 3 N 0 0 w N O C) V V1 c m U t x w 1v rn m of to O PREPARED FOR: Aluminum Pan with Rafter Inset Shutte Stucc Cost Sto Shutter Stone Secondary Tower Concept Aluminum Panel Roof with Rafter Details Inset Shutter Detaii Stucco Finish. Cast Stone Trim. Shutter DetaI ( 1 C{ Stone Finist; I C 30' Tower Concept HAMMOCK PARK MPUD EXHIBIT C-2 "TOWER RENDERINGS" WILTON LAND COMPANY, LLC `DESIGNS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AT TIME OF APPROVAL RF NMENGINEERING CIVIL ENGINEERING I PLANNING I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 28100 BONITA GRANDE DRIVE. SURE 305 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135 P: 239.405.7777 F. 239-405-7899 EMAIL: InfoQwalJropenglneering.wm Packet Pg. 288 3.C.d FLORIDA DEPARTMENT Of STATE RON DESANTIS Governor November 4, 2020 Ms. Ann Jennejohn, BMR Senior Deputy Clerk Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court & Comptroller of Collier County 3329 Tamiami Trail E, Suite #401 Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Ms. Jennejohn: LAUREL M.LEE Secretary of State Pursuant to the provisions of Section 125.66, Florida Statutes, this will acknowledge receipt of your electronic copy of Collier County Ordinance No. 20-39, which was filed in this office on November 4, 2020. Sincerely, Ernest L. Reddick Program Administrator ELR/lb R. A. Gray Building . 500 South Bronough Street • Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0250 Telephone: (850) 245-6270 Packet Pg. 289 3.C.d HAMMOCK PARK MPUD PDI-PL20240000770 HEX DECISION 2021-46 Packet Pg. 290 3.C.d ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO CLERK OF COURT'S OFFICE COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER Route to Addressee(s) (List in routing order) Office Initials Date Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office HD 10/15/21 PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION Normally the primary contact is the person who created'prepared the Document. Primary contact information is needed in the event there is a need for additional or missing information. Name of Primary Andrew Dickman, Esq. Phone Number Alternate Phone Number Contact Heather DeSanto, Paralegal 239-434-0840 239-302-2701 Hearing Examiner 9/23/21 Hearing Petition ID(s PDI-PL20210000895 Meeting Date Type of Document Agenda Decision Number of Original 1 Attached Back-up Documents Transcript Documents Attached PO number or account number if 131-138350-649030 document is to be recorded INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST Use the Check Box in the Yes column or mark "N/A" in the Not Applicable column, whichever is appropriate. Yes NIA 1. Does the decision amend an Ordinance? If yes, Ordinance Number Amended is 07-30, as amended ✓ 2 Other than the Hearing Examiner, documents are to be emailed to: Diane.Lvnchvii,colliercount •fl. 7ov; Patricia.Mill o coil iercount yfl. rov Has the date for the Hearing Examiner's signature line been entered as the 3. Final Decision date? Original document has been si ned/initialed for legal sufficiency? ✓ 4• The final decision is dated 10/15/21 I GMD\Zomng HEX\HEX Meeting Packets Packet Pg. 291 3.C.d HEX NO. 2021-46 HEARING EXAMINER DECISION DATE OF HEARING. September 23, 2021 PF.TITI"N PETITION NO. PDI-PL20210000895 — Hammock Park Apartments, LLC requests an insubstantial change to the Hammock Park MPUD, Ordinance No. 07-30, as amended, for (1) a deviation from LDC Section 5.03.02.0 to increase the maximum fence and wall height of 6 feet to 8 feet around the multi -family residential portion on the C/MU(1) tract shown on the Hammock Park PUD master plan subject to approval from FPL and Collier County Public Utilities Department, where applicable, and to revise the Hammock Park PUD master plan showing the maximum fence and wall height of 8 feet around the multi -family residential portion on the C/MU(1) tract; (2) the modification of General Development Commitment 5.10.A to clarify that the affordable housing units are for Essential Service Providers earning 100% or less than the County's median income; and (3) the modification of General Development Commitment 5.10.B to clarify that the 5,000 square feet of "Eating and Drinking Places, Sit Down/ Quality Restaurant" includes outdoor seating area. The subject property consists of 19.13 acres, at the northeast corner of Rattlesnake Hammock Road and Collier Boulevard in Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. GENERAL PURPOSE FOR THE PETITION. The subject property was rezoned to a Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) to allow for a development option of 265 multi -family units and 80,000 SF of commercial uses. The proposed for this PDI changes are to increase the fence to 8 feet, clarify the test pertaining to affordable housing, and modify the commercial restaurant to allow for outdoor seating. STAFF RECOMMENDATION. Approval with conditions. Ti INiDIN(i' C _ 1. The Hearing Examiner has jurisdiction over this Petitioner pursuant to Sec. 2-87 of the Collier County of Ordinances, Sec. 8.10.00 of the Land Development Code, and Chapter 9 of the County Administrative Code. 2. The public hearing for this Petition was properly noticed and conducted in accordance with all County and state requirements. Page 1 of 6 Packet Pg. 292 3.C.d 3. The public hearing was conducted electronically and in -person in accordance with Emergency/Executive Order 2020-04. 4. The Petitioner and/or Petitioner's representative executed the Hybrid Virtual Quasi -Judicial Public Hearing Waiver related to conducting the public hearing electronically and in -person. 5. The Petitioner and/or Petitioner's representative presented the Petition, followed by County staff and then public comment. There were no objections at the public hearing. 6. The Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) was held on August 9, 2021, at the Fairway Bible Church located at 3855 The Lords Way 15000 Livingston Road, Naples FL 34114. No members of the public were present or participating remotely and therefore no recording or transcript has been available. 7. This project does not require Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Section 2- 1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. However, Environmental Services staff recommend approval of the proposed petition. 8. The County's Land Development Code Sections 10.02.13.E.1 and 10.02.13.E.2 lists the criteria for an insubstantial change to an approved PUD Ordinance. The Hearing Examiner having the authority of the Planning Commission may approve a request for an insubstantial change to an approved PUD ordinance upon review and evaluation of the criteria in the Collier County Land Development Code.' Section 10.02.13.E.1 Criteria: 1. Is there a proposed change in the boundary of the Planned Unit Development (PUD)? The record from the public hearing reflects that there is no proposed change in the boundary of the PUD. 2. Is there a proposed increase in the total number of dwelling units or intensity of land use or height of buildings within the development? The record from the public hearing reflects that there is no proposed increase in the number of dwelling units or intensity of land use, or height of buildings within the development. 3. Is there a proposed decrease in preservation, conservation, recreation, or open space areas within the development in excess of five (5) percent of the total acreage previously designated as such, or five (5) acres in area? 'The Hearing Examiner's findings are italicized. Page 2 of 6 Packet Pg. 293 3.C.d The record from the public hearing reflects that there is no proposed decrease in preservation, conservation, recreation, or open space areas within the development as designated on the approved Master Plan. 4. Is there a proposed increase in the size of areas used for non-residential uses, to include institutional, commercial, and industrial land uses (excluding preservation, conservation or open space), or a proposed relocation of nonresidential land uses? The record from the public hearing reflects that there would be no increase to the size of areas used for non-residential uses and no relocation of non-residential areas. 5. Is there a substantial increase in the impacts of the development which may include, but are not limited to increases in traffic generation; changes in traffic circulation; or impacts on other public facilities? The record from the public hearing reflects that there are no substantial impacts resulting from this amendment. 6. Will the change result in land use activities that generate a higher level of vehicular traffic based upon the Trip Generation Manual published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers? The record from the public hearing reflects that there are no substantial impacts resulting from this amendment. 7. Will the change result in a requirement for increased stormwater retention, or otherwise increase stormwater discharge? The record from the public hearing reflects that the proposed changes will not impact or increase stormwater retention or increase stormwater discharge. 8. Will the proposed change bring about a relationship to an abutting land use that would be incompatible with an adjacent land use? The record from the public hearing reflects that there will be no incompatible relationships with abutting land uses. 9. Are there any modifications to the PUD Master Plan or PUD document or amendment to a PUD ordinance which is inconsistent with the Future Land Use Element or other elements of the Growth Management Plan or which modification would increase the density of intensity of the permitted land uses? The record from the public hearing reflects that the proposed changes to the PUD Document are consistent with the FLUE of the GMP. Both environmental and Transportation Planning staff reviewed this petition, and no changes to the PUD Document are proposed that would be deemed inconsistent with the CCME or the Transportation Page 3 of 6 Packet Pg. 294 3.C.d Element of the GMP. This petition does not propose any increase in density or intensity of the permitted land uses. Section 10.02.13.E.2 Criteria: Does this petition change the analysis of the findings and criteria used for the original application? The record from the public hearing reflects that the proposed change does not affect the original analysis and findings for the most recent zoning action in Petition PUDA- PL20180002813. Deviation: Proposed Deviation #7 (Fence/Wall): Deviation #7 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.C, which allows for a maximum fence and wall height of 6 feet for residential zoning districts, to allow for a maximum fence and wall height of 8 feet around the multi -family residential portion on the C/MU (1) tract shown on the Hammock Park PUD master plan subject to approval from FPL and Collier County Public Utilities Department, where applicable. Petitioner's Justification: The request will allow for an appropriate height of fence or wall around the multi -family residential area of the commercial/mixed-use (C/MU) parcel, to screen the residential uses from adjacent roadways and non-residential uses in the project. Due to the MPUD utilizing a residential and commercial mixed -use design, the additional height of a fence or wall will serve as a safety precaution and enhance compatibility between non-residential and residential uses within the project. It is anticipated the commercial portion of the property will have a large customer volume, particularly due to the gas station use proposed at the corner of Rattlesnake Hammock Road and Collier Blvd. Therefore, establishing a boundary for the multi -family residence supplemented by an eight -foot -tall fence/wall will allow for privacy, safety, and security of the residents. Additionally, the commercial portion of the property faces Collier Blvd, a major arterial facility with relatively high traffic volume. The proposed fence or wall will mitigate noise and light impacts generated by the roadway. Not only will the additional fence/wall height provide safety to the residents, but it will also provide an aesthetic enhancement to the project. The fence or wall will obstruct views of surface parking areas and service areas. The required landscape plantings will be provided on the exterior of the wall to further soften aesthetics. The proposed fence or wall will comply with local permitting requirements and will not impact any easements located on the property. The record from the public hearing reflects that the additional fence/wall height will allow for appropriate screening of the residential buildings from the adjacent public roadways, as well as the gas station being constructed in the MPUD along the Collier Blvd. frontage. This fence/wall height is consistent with approvals in other residential communities and will assist in blocking Page 4 of 6 Packet Pg. 295 3.C.d noise, lighting, and other potential influences from the adjacent land uses. The request will enhance compatibility and will be aesthetically pleasing via placement of landscape materials on the exterior side of the fence/wall. There will be no detrimental effect if this deviation request is approved. Zoning staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation, finding that in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community, " and LDC Section 10. 02.13.B. 5. h, the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is `justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. " ANALYSIS. Based on a review of the record including the Petition, application, exhibits, the County's staff report, and hearing comments and testimony from the Petitioner and/or the Petitioner's representative(s), County staff and any given by the public, the Hearing Examiner finds that there is enough competent, substantial evidence as applied to the criteria set forth in Sections 10.02.13.E.1 and 10.02.13.E.2 of the Land Development Code to approve Petition. DF.f TCTf1N The Hearing Examiner hereby APPROVES Petition Number PDI-PL20210000895, filed by Alexis Crespo, AICP of Waldrop Engineering, P.A. representing Hammock Park Apartments, LLC, with respect to the property in the Hammock Park MPUD Ordinance No. 07-30, as amended, and described as the property consisting of 19.13 acres, at the northeast corner of Rattlesnake Hammock Road and Collier Boulevard in Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, for the following: • An insubstantial change to the Hammock Park MPUD, Ordinance No. 07-30, as amended, for (1) a deviation from LDC Section 5.03.02.0 to increase the maximum fence and wall height of 6 feet to 8 feet around the multi -family residential portion on the C/MU(1) tract shown on the Hammock Park PUD master plan subject to approval from FPL and Collier County Public Utilities Department, where applicable, and to revise the Hammock Park PUD master plan showing the maximum fence and wall height of 8 feet around the multi- family residential portion on the C/MU(1) tract; (2) the modification of General Development Commitment 5.10.A to clarify that the affordable housing units are for Essential Service Providers earning 100% or less than the County's median income; and (3) the modification of General Development Commitment 5.10.B to clarify that the 5,000 square feet of "Eating and Drinking Places, Sit Down/ Quality Restaurant" includes outdoor seating area. Said changes are fully described in the revised PUD document and Master Plan attached as Exhibit "A" and are subject to the condition(s) set forth below. ATTACHMENTS. Exhibit A — Revised PUD Document and Master Plan Page 5 of 6 Packet Pg. 296 3.C.d LEGAL DESCRIPTION. See Ordinance No. 07-30, as amended, and described as the property consisting of 19.13 acres, at the northeast corner of Rattlesnake Hammock Road and Collier Boulevard in Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida CONDITIONS. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development. DISCLAIMER. Pursuant to Section 125.022(5) F.S., issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. APPEALS. This decision becomes effective on the date it is rendered. An appeal of this decision shall be done in accordance with applicable ordinances, codes and law. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AND EXHIBITS: SEE CLERK OF COURT, MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. DECISIONS OF THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR VARIANCES, CONDITIONAL USES, AND BOAT DOCK EXTENSIONS SHALL BE NOTED ON THE ZONING MAP FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES. Date Andrew Dickman, Esq., AICP Hearing Examiner Page 6 of 6 Packet Pg. 297 3.C.d EXHIBIT "A" Packet Pg. 298 3.C.d SECTION V GENERAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS 5.1 - 5.9 [NO CHANGES] 5.10 MISCELLANEOUS A. Developer shall make 48 units available for rent for Essential Service Personnel (ESP) e*. During periods where ESP occupancy is below 48 units, an ESP renter shall take priority over any other renter until such occupancy level is reached. A minimum of 27 of the 48 units will be income restricted to households eaming no more than 100% of Collier County' s median income. The income- restricted units will be offered for rent for a period of 30 years to ESP renters for an +n'the amount e€the that does not exceed the most current Collier County Beard appF Table of Rental Rates at the that established the rental limits for 100% of median income and the lew- ineeme eatege -y based on the number of bedrooms in the unit beingrented. B. The development is required to provide a minimum of 20,000 square feet of commercial uses, of which a minimum of 5,000 square feet shall be dedicated to Eating and Drinking Places, Sit Down/ Quality Restaurants only (SIC 5812). A certificate of occupancy must be issued on a 5,000 SF restaurant, which includes outdoor seating area, prior to issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for the multi- family rental dwelling units. C. Storage Facilities, such as mini- storage or self -storage, shall be prohibited from this MPUD. D. One (1) Transfer of Development Right (TDR) per acre shall be required. Hammock Park MPUD - PDI-PL2021000895 Last Revised: August 10, 2021 Words underlined are added; words stMe-k thFeug are deleted Packet Pg. 299 3.C.d SECTION VI', z & 3 REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM THE LDC' z & 3 6.1 DEVIATIONS' A. Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.04.G.2.a to allow the off -premises directional sign for the Hacienda Lakes PUD/DRI depicted on Exhibit A-1 to have a maximum of 38 square feet in sign area (total square footage of all sign copy areas, including the name of the project and insignias or mottos), rather than 12 square feet as limited in the LDC.' B. Deviation #2 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.04.G.2.b to allow the off -premises directional sign for the Hacienda Lakes PUD/DRI depicted on Exhibit A-1 to have a maximum height of 13 feet above the lowest center grade of the roadway adjacent to the sign location, rather than 8 feet as limited in the LDC.' C. Deviation #3 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.02.03.A, which requires accessory structures to be constructed simultaneously with or following the construction of the principal structure, to instead allow accessory structures to be constructed prior to construction of the principal structure. This deviation shall apply only to the two (2) accessory tower structures at the location depicted on Exhibit C-1, "Tower Locations," and further shown on Exhibit C-2, "Tower Renderings." Z D. Deviation #4 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.04.G.2.a, which allows for a maximum sign area of 12 square feet for off -premises directional signs, to allow for a maximum sign area of 64 square feet for the proposed temporary off -premises directional sign as depicted in Exhibit 13-1 and referenced by Section 2.6.0 of the MPUD document. 3 E. Deviation #5 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.04.G.2.b, which allows for a maximum sign height of 8 feet for off -premises signs, to allow for a maximum sign height of 10 feet for the proposed off -premises sign as depicted in Exhibit D-1 and referenced by Section 2.6.0 of the MPUD document. 3 F. Deviation #6 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.04.G.2.e, which requires off -premises directional signs to be located no more than 1,000 feet from the use for which the sign is displayed, to allow the proposed temporary off -premises directional sign to be located no more than 1,320+/- feet from the use for which the sign is displayed as depicted in Exhibit D- 1 and referenced by Section 2.6.0 of the MPUD document.3 G. Deviation #7 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.C, which allows for a maximum fence and wall height of 6 feet for residential zoning districts, to allow for a maximum fence and wall height of 8 feet around the multi -family residential portion on the C/MU (1) tract shown on the Hammock Park PUD master plan subject to approval from FPL and Collier County Public Utilities Department, where applicable. 1. Approved in HEX decision 2014-28. 2. Approved in HEX decision 2016-42. 3. Pending approval per PL20200001952. Hammock Park MPUD— PDI-PL2021000895 Last Revised: August 10, 2021 Words underlined are added; words seek -Neagh are deleted Packet Pg. 300 3.C.d 3 v j 4 i I } i ( I L EXISTING ICON WIFR l:OUNTY� PRODUCTION WELIi I } 01 EXIWING- ' V SIDE�NALK t � 0 ) ZONING PUD } G EXISTING LAND USE > COMMERCIAL ; j (NAPLES LAKES VILLAGE CENTER) O 0 ' -i FLU: URBAN i x Z RESIDENTIAL W Q SUB -DISTRICT :3 V MIXED USE ACTIVITY O rn CENTER V i � i U EXISTING 12' FORCE MAIN 1`� i i } i i I } I I ZONING: PUD EXISTING LAND USE SIERRA MEADOWS COMMERCIAL - RESIDENTIAL FLU URBAN RESIDENTIAL SUB -DISTRICT MIXED USE ACTIVITY CENTER ) 1 I EXISTING 36' WATER MAIN ACCESS EASEMENT OR 4474, PG 1232 OR 5705, PG148 rBUFFER PER LDC AT TIME / OF SDP OR PLAT EASEMENT OR5056, PG3544 ZONING. MPUD BUFFER PER LDC EXISTING LAND USE: VACANT AT TIME OF (GOOD TURN CENTER MPUD) SDP OR PLAT FLU: URBAN RESIDENTIAL FRINGE MIXED USE ACTIVITY CENTER _______________________ A7 m,.. mII& 4MU& 41WY 4MW& au 1.63± AC Im _u-IL ---- --- LL---- — ----'�------------ 1 I C/MU 1 I 1 BUFFER PER LDC AT I TIME OF SDP OR PLAT 1 -MAXIMUM 8' WALUFENCE MAXIMUM 8 WALUFENCE MAXIMUM 8' WALUFENCE MAXIMUM 8'� BUFFER PER LDC AT WALUFENCE TIME OF SDP OR PLAT . NORTH SCALE 1" 200' (SEE NOTE 2) ZONING PUD EXISTING LAND USE Z VACANT a (MCMULLEN PUD) FLU: URBAN RESIDENTIAL O FRINGE SUB -DISTRICT MIXED USE \ ACTIVITY CENTER SIDEWALK RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RD COLLIER COUNTY UTILITY EASEMENT OR 5201, PG2074 OR 5201, PG2090 -------------------------------- ZONING MPUD ( EXISTING LAND USE VACANT COMMERCIAL } (HACIENDA LAKES MPUD) FLU: URBAN RESIDENTIAL f FRINGE SUB -DISTRICT MIXED fUSE ACTIVITY CENTER i LEGEND INGRESS/ EGRESS Y PRESERVE ® FPL EASEMENT /DRY DETENTION TRACT L NE Y fC IZ Y E R O O O O O 04 O 04 J 11 w Do co co N 1_� f2 y z Z to Z fI- N P r- z F- Z Z W W W W W 0 E 0 0 f 00 0 0 0 U U U U U z z z z z Z Z Z Z Z > > 7 7 p7 U U U U U z of m a LU Wa i a a �lo l�lol�ll Packet Pg. 301 SITE SUMMARY CATEGORY ACREAGE PERCENTAGE OF TOTALACREAGE PRESERVE 1.63 AC 8.52 % BUFFERS 1.31 AC 6.85 % FPL EASEMENT / DRY DETENTION 2.43 AC 12.70 % DEVELOPMENT TRACTS C/MU 8.02 AC 41.92 % PERVIOUS OPEN SPACE 5.74 AC 30.01 % TOTAL 19.13 AC 100.00 % LAND USE SUMMARY C/MU 80,000 SF COMMERCIAL PLUS UP TO 265 DWELLING UNITS OR 160,000 SF COMMERCIAL ONLY (1) RESIDENTIAL PERMITTED IN THIS AREA OPEN SPACE SUMMARY TOTAL REQUIRED (19.13 x 30%) 5.74 AC TOTAL PROVIDED 5.74 AC PRESERVE SUMMARY NATIVE PRESERVE REQUIRED: 1.63 AC NATIVE PRESERVE PROVIDED: 1.63 AC GENERAL NOTES EjW 1' 1. THIS PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND IS SUBJECT TO MINOR MODIFICATION DUE TO AGENCY PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS. i 2. PRESERVES MAY BE USED TO SATISFY THE Q LANDSCAPE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS AFTER EXOTIC �D VEGETATION REMOVAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH LDC p SECTIONS 4.06.02 AND 4.06.05.E.1. SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTINGS WITH NATIVE PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE z IN ACCORDANCE WITH LDC SECTION 3.05.07. IN THE ¢ EVENT THAT A TYPE "B" BUFFER IS REQUIRED ALONG ¢ THE EAST BOUNDARY, A MINIMUM 6-FOOT-WIDE F a �m RESERVATION LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE PRESERVE < x WILL BE CONVEYED BY OWNER TO A HOMEOWNERS o ASSOCIATION, PROPERTY OWNER'S ASSOCIATION OR o= O CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION AT TIME OF SDP APPROVAL. IN THE EVENT THAT THE PRESERVE DOES NOT MEET THE BUFFER REQUIREMENT AFTER REMOVAL OF EXOTICS AND SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING IN ACCORDANCE WITH LDC SECTION 3.05.07, THE OWNER WILL INSTALL LANDSCAPE MATERIAL IN THE RESERVATION TO MEET THE PLANT SIZE AND SPACING REQUIREMENTS OF THE BUFFER. 3. REFER TO THE BOUNDARY SURVEY FOR ALL z W f 2 z W i 2 z W f f z z W W f m 2 2 EASEMENTS. 0 0 0 0 0 to z z z z z z S s �WWWW a U a s a s z W a a �I�I?IoIS Packet Pg. 302 3.C.d x HAMMOCK PARK MPUD PDI-PL20240000770 ORIGINAL PUD REZONE STAFF REPORT Packet Pg. 303 3.C.d C1o` =er County TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ZONING DIVISION — ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT - PLANNING & REGULATION HEARING DATE: AUGUST 6, 2020 SUBJECT: PUDA-PL20180002813 HAMMOCK PARK MIXED -USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (MPUD) — COMPANION TO ITEM GMPA- PL20180002804, HAMMOCK PARK GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT PROPERTY OWNER/APPLICANT AND AGENTS: Pronertv Owner/ADDlicant: David Torres c/o Wilton Land Company, LLC 206 Dudley Road Wilton, CT 06897 Agents: Alexis Crespo, AICP Waldrop Engineering, P.A. 28100 Bonita Grande Drive # 305 Bonita Springs, FL 34135 REQUESTED ACTION: Richard Yovanovich, Esquire Coleman, Yovanovich and Koester, P.A. 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 Naples, FL 34103 The petitioner requests that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider an Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance Number 07- 30, the Hammock Park Commerce Centre Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD), to allow up to 265 multi -family rental dwelling units plus 148,500 square feet of commercial development as an alternative to 160,000 square feet of retail and office currently allowed; by changing the name of the CPUD from Hammock Park Commerce Centre to the Hammock Park Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD); by revising the development standards; by amending the Master Plan and revising developer commitments and by providing an effective date. PUDA-PL20180002813 HAMMOCK PARK MPUD July 13, 2020 Page 1 of 14 Packet Pg. 304 3.C.d a A PROJECT LOCATION tlesnake im H — — 0 t� i fz Location Map Petition Number: PL20180002813 MUD__ C-4 All Uj W-11 MPUD CPUD .M Zoning Map - RI UD SITE LOCATION all MPUD Or M; w 00 00 00 Packet Pg. 305 3.C.d N CD CD I A i I i EXISTING COLLIER PRODUCTION WELLi I m EXISTING - SIDEWALK � 0 ZONING: POD < 7 EXISl1NG LAND USE' COMMERCIAL Lu (NAPLES LAKES wD VILLAGE CENTER) m -� FLU: URBAN _ RESIDENTIAL w SUB -DISTRICT J C] MIXED USE ACTVFY O m CENTER U i i U DISMNG I FORCE FAIN - EXISTING W WATER MAIN f! i CONSERVATION EASEMENT CCESS EASEMENT CR 056, PG3544 OR 4474, PG 1232 ZONING: MPUD OR 5705, PG 14B EXISTING LAND USE: VACANT f ,BUFFER PER LDC AT TIME (GOOD TURN CENTER MPUU) fjJ i OF SDP OR PLAT FLU: URBAN RESIDENTIAL FRINGE MIXED USE ACTIVITY CENTER i I C/mu ' I BUFFER PER LDC AT TIME OF SDP OR PLAT cmu (1) BUFFER PER LDC AT TIME OF SDP OR PLAT BUFFER PER LDC AT TIME OF SDP OR PLAT NORTH SCALE: 1" = 200' —6 RESERVATION (SEE NOTE 2) a zo ZONING: PUD IXISTING LAND USE Z VACANT Y w a (MC MULLEN PUD) FLU: URBAN ? �} RESIDENTIAL 6-¢ I FRINGE O SUB -DISTRICT MIXED USE ACTIVITY CENTER -- +\l - PJ A �I At -- - -- - __-- - L —� SIDEWALK _ -- ----- -" ------ _ i! RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RD COLLIER COUNTY uTIUTV EASEMENT OR 5241, PG2074 a� OR 5201, PG201.10 ---_-- -- —� __ ________ ___ _ __ _— _ - -- ZONING: PUD EXISTING LANDUSI' ZONING: MPUD SIERRA MEADOWS EXISTING LAND USE: COMMERCIAL* VACANT COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL (HACIENDA LAKES MPUD) FLU: URBAN FLU: URBAN RESIDENTIAL RESBDENTIAL I. FRINGE SUB -DISTRICT MIXED SUB -DISTRICT USE ACTIVITY CENTER MIXED USE ACTIVITY CENTER Y <Q a Y V O 2 O ti 0 0 0 O N O N J a CD 00 00 00 Packet Pg. 306 3.C.d SITE SUMMARY CATEGORY ACREAGE PERCENTAGE OF TOTALACREAGE PRESERVE 1.63 AC 8.52 % BUFFERS 1.31 AC 6.85 % FPL EASEMENT! DRY DETENTION 2.43 AC 12.70 % DEVELOPMENT TRACTS CIMU 8.02 AC 41.92 % PERVIOUS OPEN SPACE 5.74 AC 30.01 % TOTAL 19.13AC 100.00 % LAND USE SUMMARY 146,500 SF COMMERCIAL PLUS UP TO 265 DWELLING CIMU UNITS, OR 160,000 SF COMMERCIAL ONLY (1) RESIDENTIAL PERMITTED IN THIS AREA OPEN SPACE SUMMARY TOTAL REQUIRED (19.13 x 30%) 5.74 AC TOTAL PROVIDED �J4 AU PRESERVE SUMMARY NATIVE PRESERVE REQUIRED: 1.63 AC NATIVE PRESERVE PROVIDED: 1.63 AC 3 m QX0 APHIC LOCATION: GENERALNOTES 1, THIS PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND IS SUBJECT TO MINOR MODIFICATION DUE TO AGENCY PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS. 2. EXISTING VEGETATION IN THE CONSERVATION EASEMENT ALONG THE EAST MAY BE USED TO SATISFY THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS AFTER EXOTIC VEGETATION REMOVAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH LDC SECTIONS 4.06 42 AND 4,06.05.E.1. SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTINGS WITH NATIVE PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LDC SECTION 3.05.07. IN THE EVENT THAT A TYPE "B" BUFFER IS REQUIRED ALONG THE EAST BOUNDARY, A MINIMUM 6-FOOT-WIDE RESERVATION LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE EXISTING VEGETATION IN THE CONSERVATION EASEMENT ALONG THE EAST WILL BE CONVEYED BY OWNER TO A HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION, PROPERTY OWNER'S ASSOCIATION OR CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION AT TIME OF SDP APPROVAL. IN THE EVENT THAT THE EXISTING VEGETATION IN THE CONSERVATION EASEMENT ALONG THE EAST DOES NOT MEET THE BUFFER REQUIREMENT AFTER REMOVAL OF EXOTICS AND SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING IN ACCORDANCE WITH LDC SECTION 3.05.07, THE OWNER WILL INSTALL LANDSCAPE MATERIAL IN THE RESERVATION TO MEET THE PLANT SIZE AND SPACING REQUIREMENTS OF THE BUFFER. 3_ REFER TO THE BOUNDARY SURVEY FOR ALL EASEMENTS. The subject PUD, consisting of 19.13± acres, is located at the northeast corner of Rattlesnake Hammock Road (CR 864) and Collier Boulevard (CR 951) in Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. (See the Location Map on page 2 of this Staff Report.) PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The subject undeveloped property was originally rezoned from Rural Agricultural (A) to PUD in 2000 per Ordinance Number 00-79. In 2007, the subject property was rezoned from PUD to CPUD per Ordinance Number 07-30 to allow for a maximum of 160,000 square feet of commercial retail and office uses. The CPUD was amended in 2014 per HEX Decision 2014-28, to allow for signage related to Hacienda Lakes of Naples PUD. The CPUD was amended again in 2016 per HEX Decision 2016-42 to allow for the construction of accessory structures. See Attachment B-Previous Ordinances and Decisions. The petitioner proposes an alternative land use to add a maximum of 265 multi -family dwelling units, with a density of 13.85 dwelling units per acre, creating an MPUD from the current CPUD. If the 265 multi -family dwelling units are developed, the maximum amount of non-residential uses will be limited to 148,500 square feet, so as not to exceed the current trip count for the currently approved PUDA-PL20180002813 HAMMOCK PARK MPUD July 13, 2020 Page 4 of 14 Packet Pg. 307 3.C.d 160,000 square feet of commercial land uses, or 577 PM peak hour trips. See Attachment A — Proposed PUD Ordinance. SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: North: An undeveloped 9.5± acre parcel with a zoning designation of Good Turn Center PUD which allows 100,000 square feet of commercial land use and/or a variety of skilled nursing care facility uses with a maximum of 200 units. East: An undeveloped 19.32± acre parcel with a zoning designation of McMullen MPUD which allows 185,000 square feet of commercial and/or independent living, assisted living, and nursing home care units. South: An undeveloped 34.16± acre commercial parcel (which is part of a 2,262± acre DRI) with a zoning designation of Hacienda Lakes MPUD and a gross density of 0.78 dwelling units per acre. West: SFWMD 951 Canal, Collier Boulevard, a 6-lane divided roadway, and a developed commercial strip shopping center with a zoning designation of Naples Lakes Country Club PUD and a gross density of 1.67 dwelling unit per acre. Please see Attachment F-Density Exhibit. - R m o'-".'R- R - RD PUDA-PL20180002813 HAMMOCK PARK MPUD AERIAL PHOTO July 13, 2020 Page 5 of 14 Packet Pg. 308 3.C.d GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: Comprehensive Planning staff has reviewed the proposed PUD Amendment and has found it consistent with the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the GMP. See Attachment C — FLUE Consistency Review. Transportation Element: In evaluating this project, staff reviewed the applicant's May 30, 2019, Trip Generation Statement (TIS) for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP using the then applicable 2018 and the current 2019 Annual Update and Inventory Reports (AUIR). Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP states; "The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the 5-year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and c. For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project's significant impacts on all roadways. " Staff finding: According to the TIS provided with this petition, the requested PUD amendment proposes mixed -use development by adding 265 multi -family dwelling units along with 148,500 square feet of commercial uses; which represents a reduction of approximately 11,500 square feet of commercial uses. Both the original commercial development and the new proposed mixed -use development will generate a projected 577± PM peak hour, two-way trips that will occur on the following adjacent roadway network. The trips generated by this development will occur on the following adjacent roadway link: PUDA-PL20180002813 HAMMOCK PARK MPUD July 13, 2020 Page 6 of 14 Packet Pg. 309 3.C.d Link/Roadway Link 2018 2019 Current Peak 2018 2019 AUIR AUIR Hour Peak Remaining Remaining LOS LOS Direction Service Capacity Capacity Volume/Peak Direction 34.0/CR-951 Davis Blvd D D 3,000/North 834 580 Collier Blvd to Rattlesnake Hammock Road 35.0/CR-951 Rattlesnake C C 3,200/North 962 813 Collier Blvd Hammock Road to US-41 Tamiami Trail 75.0/Rattlesnake CR-951 B B 2,900/West 2,200 2,147 Hammock Road Collier Blvd to Santa Barbara Blvd Based on the 2019 AUIR, the adjacent roadway network will continue to have sufficient capacity to accommodate the proposed trips for this project within the 5-year planning period. Therefore, the subject rezoning can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP. Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental Planning staff found this project to be consistent with the CCME. Native vegetation required to be retained for the PUD was approved in accordance with Ordinance Number 07-30 (minimum 1.63 acres). A conservation easement for 1.66 acres of native vegetation has been placed under preservation and dedicated to Collier County (OR 4496, Page 258) and to South Florida Water Management District (OR 5056, Page 3544). GMP Conclusion: The proposed PUD Rezone may be deemed consistent with the FLUE of the GMP subject to the adoption of the companion GMP amendment. STAFF ANALYSIS: Staff completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition, including the criteria upon which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in Land Development Code (LDC) Section 10.02.13 B.5., Planning Commission Recommendation (commonly referred to as the "PUD Findings"), and Section 10.02.08 F., Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission Report (referred to as "Rezone Findings"), which establish the legal basis to support the CCPC recommendation. The CCPC uses these same criteria as the basis for their recommendation to the Board of Collier County Commissioners (BCC), who in turn use the criteria to support their action PUDA-PL20180002813 HAMMOCK PARK MPUD July 13, 2020 Page 7 of 14 Packet Pg. 310 3.C.d on the rezoning request. An evaluation relative to these subsections is discussed below, under the headings "Rezone Findings" and "PUD Findings." In addition, staff offers the following analysis: Environmental Review: Environmental Planning staff has reviewed this petition to address environmental concerns. The PUD preserve requirement is 1.63 acres, per Ordinance Number 07- 30; 1.66 acres of native vegetation has been placed in a conservation easement and dedicated to Collier County and South Florida Water Management District. No listed plant or animal species were observed on the property. The Environmental Data indicates the subject property falls within the USFWS Primary Florida Panther (Felis concolor coryi) Habitat. There were no observations of panther onsite and the USFWS issued a Biological Opinion on December 17, 2008, to address potential project -related impacts to the Florida panther or its habitat. A habitat management plan for protected species will be included at PPL or SDP review. An active bald eagle nest was documented approximately 20 feet north of the project site. Consultation with USFWS and FWCC regarding guidelines and permitting requirements will be required prior to construction. This project does require Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project does meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. Specifically, the project is within the 330-foot and 660-foot bald eagle nest protection zones. Transportation Review: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petition for compliance with the GMP and the LDC and recommends approval. Utilities Review: The project lies within the regional potable water service area and south wastewater service area of the Collier County Water -Sewer District (CCWSD). Water and wastewater services are readily available via connections to existing infrastructure on -site and within the adjacent right- of-way. Sufficient water and wastewater treatment capacities are available. Adequate downstream wastewater system capacity must be confirmed at the time of development permit ((Site Development Plan (SDP) or Plans and Plat (PPL)) review through a thorough engineering analysis, which will be discussed at a mandatory pre -submittal conference with representatives from the Public Utilities Engineering and Project Management Division and the Growth Management Development Review Division. As stated in subsection 5.6 of the PUD document, any improvements to the Collier County Water -Sewer District's wastewater collection/transmission system necessary to provide sufficient capacity to serve the project will be the responsibility of the owner/developer and will be conveyed to the Collier County Water -Sewer District at no cost to the County at the time of utility acceptance. School Board Review: At this time there is existing or planned capacity within the next five -years for the purposed development at the elementary, middle, and high school levels. At the time of SDP or PPL, the development would be reviewed for concurrency to ensure there is capacity either within the concurrency service area the development is located within or in adjacent concurrency service areas. Zoning and Land Development Review: FLUE Policy 5.4 requires new land uses to be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses. In reviewing the appropriateness of the PUDA-PL20180002813 HAMMOCK PARK MPUD July 13, 2020 Page 8 of 14 Packet Pg. 311 3.C.d requested uses and intensity on the subject site, the compatibility analysis included a review of the subject proposal comparing it to surrounding or nearby properties as to allowed use intensities and densities, development standards (building heights, setbacks, landscape buffers, etc.), building mass, building location and orientation, architectural features, amount and type of open space and location. Staff believes that the proposed development will be compatible with and complementary to the surrounding land uses. Staff offers the following analysis of this project: The Master Plan, located on page 3 of this Staff Report, depicts the area of proposed mixed -use (commercial and residential development). Residential development is permitted only in the eastern three-quarters of the PUD. An approximately 100-foot wide preserve area separates the area from the undeveloped Good Turn Center PUD to the north. A 170-foot wide FPL easement and an 80-foot wide conservation area along the eastern boundary separates the Hammock Park PUD from the McMullen MPUD to the east. To the south is Rattlesnake Hammock Road, an approximately 130-foot wide right- of-way and then the undeveloped commercial area of the Hacienda Lakes MPUD. To the west is an approximately 100-foot wide canal area and then Collier Boulevard, a 6-lane divided roadway, and then a developed commercial strip shopping center at Naples Lakes Country Club PUD. The proposed PUD boundary setback for the residential uses is 25 feet. (This does not include the area along the east boundary as there already is an FPL easement there.) The front yard, side yard, and rear yard setbacks are 10 feet, 5 feet, and 10 feet respectively. All other development standards are similar to the previously approved commercial development standards. The building height is the same, 50 feet zoned height. A minimum of 30% open space has been provided. The Developer has committed to providing a minimum of 48 rental units to Essential Service Personnel. A minimum of 27 of the 48 units will be income -restricted to households earning 100% of Collier County's median income. The development is required to provide a minimum of 20,000 square feet of commercial uses, of which a minimum of 5,000 square feet will be dedicated to Eating and Drinking Places, Restaurants (SIC 5812). Storage facilities, such as mini -storage and self -storage, are prohibited from the MPUD. CONCURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS: There are no concurrent land use applications under review at the present time. REZONE FINDINGS: Staff offers the following analysis: 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the GMP. The Comprehensive Planning staff has indicated that the proposed PUD Amendment is consistent with all applicable elements of the FLUE of the GMP. See Attachment C — FLUE Consistency Review. PUDA-PL20180002813 HAMMOCK PARK MPUD July 13, 2020 Page 9 of 14 Packet Pg. 312 3.C.d 2. The existing land use pattern. As described in the "Surrounding Land Use and Zoning" portion of this report and discussed in the zoning review analysis, the neighborhood's existing land use pattern can be characterized as developed and undeveloped commercial, and undeveloped continuing care retirement communities. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. The subject parcel is of sufficient size that it will not result in an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. It is also comparable with expected land uses by virtue of its consistency with the FLUE of the GMP. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. The district boundaries are logically drawn as discussed in Items 2 and 3. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed rezone necessary. The proposed change is not necessary, but it is being requested in compliance with the LDC provisions to seek such changes because the petitioner wishes to develop the property with mixed - use and residential land uses. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. The proposed change from commercial development to mixed -use development consisting of multi- family residential and commercial development will reduce the overall intensity of land uses allowed by the current PUD. Therefore, the proposed change will not adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. The roadway infrastructure has adequate capacity to serve the proposed project at this time, i.e., the GMP is consistent at the time of rezoning as evaluated as part of the GMP Transportation Element consistency review. Operational impacts will be addressed at the time of the first development order (SDP or Plat). Additionally, the project's development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. PUDA-PL20180002813 HAMMOCK PARK MPUD July 13, 2020 Page 10 of 14 Packet Pg. 313 3.C.d The proposed development will not create a drainage problem. Furthermore, the project is subject to the requirements of Collier County and the South Florida Water Management District. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. It is anticipated that the proposed PUD Amendment will not reduce light and air to adjacent areas inside or outside the PUD. 10. Whether the proposed change would adversely affect property values in the adjacent area. This is a subjective determination based upon anticipated results, which may be internal or external to the subject property. Property valuation is affected by a host of factors including zoning; however, zoning by itself may or may not affect values, since value determination is driven by market value. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. The basic premise underlying all of the development standards in the LDC is that their sound application, when combined with the SDP and PPL approval process, gives reasonable assurance that a change in zoning will not result in deterrence to improvement or development of the adjacent property. Therefore, the proposed zoning change should not be a deterrent to the improvement of adjacent properties. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. The development complies with the GMP, which is a public policy statement supporting zoning actions when they are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. In light of this fact, the proposed Rezone does not constitute a grant of special privilege. Consistency with the FLUE is further determined to be a public welfare relationship because actions consistent with plans are in the public interest. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. The subject property can be used in accordance with existing zoning; however, the proposed uses cannot be achieved without rezoning the property. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county. The proposed PUD Amendment is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or County 15. Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. There may be other sites in the County that could accommodate the uses proposed. However, this is not the determining factor when evaluating the appropriateness of a zoning decision. The petition PUDA-PL20180002813 HAMMOCK PARK MPUD July 13, 2020 Page 11 of 14 Packet Pg. 314 3.C.d was reviewed on its own merit for compliance with the GMP and the LDC, and staff does not review other sites in conjunction with a specific petition. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. Any development anticipated by the PUD Document would require site alteration, and this project will undergo extensive evaluation relative to all federal, state, and local development regulations during the SDP and/or PPL processes, and as part of the building permit process. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County GMP and as defined and implemented through the Collier County adequate public facilities ordinance. The project will have to meet all applicable criteria set forth in LDC Section 6.02.00 regarding Adequate Public Facilities (APF), and the project will need to be consistent with all applicable goals and objectives of the GMP regarding adequate public facilities, except as may be exempt by federal regulations. This petition has been reviewed by County staff responsible for jurisdictional elements of the GMP as part of the amendment process, and those staff persons have concluded that no Level of Service will be adversely impacted with the commitments contained in the PUD Document. The concurrency review for APF is determined at the time of SDP review. The activity proposed by this amendment will have no impact on public facility adequacy in regard to utilities. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. To be determined by the BCC during its advertised public hearing. PUD FINDINGS: LDC Section 10.02.13.13.5 states that "In support of its recommendation, the CCPC shall make findings as to the PUD Master Plan's compliance with the following criteria:" 1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. Water distribution and wastewater collection mains are readily available along Rattlesnake Hammock Road and within the western portion of the PUD, and there are adequate water and wastewater treatment capacities to serve the proposed PUD as amended. 2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for Rezones in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. PUDA-PL20180002813 HAMMOCK PARK MPUD July 13, 2020 Page 12 of 14 Packet Pg. 315 3.C.d Documents submitted with the application provided satisfactory evidence of unified control of the property. Additionally, the development will be required to gain SDP approval. These processes will ensure that appropriate stipulations for the provision of, continuing operation of, and maintenance of infrastructure will be provided by the developer. 3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives, and policies of the GMP. County staff has reviewed this petition and has offered an analysis of the relevant goals, objectives, and policies of the GMP within the GMP discussion of this staff report. Based on that analysis, staff has found this petition consistent with the overall GMP. 4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. The landscaping and buffering standards are compatible with the adjacent uses. 5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. The amount of open space set aside for this project meets the minimum requirement of the LDC 6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. The roadway infrastructure is sufficient to serve the proposed project, as noted in the Transportation Element consistency review. Operational impacts will be addressed at the time of first development order (SDP or Plat), at which time a new TIS will be required to demonstrate turning movements for all site access points. Finally, the project's development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals, including but not limited to any SDPs or PPLs, are sought. The CCWSD has sufficient treatment capacities for water and wastewater services to the project. Conveyance capacities must be confirmed at the time of development permit application. 7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. The area has adequate supporting infrastructure, including readily available County water and wastewater mains, to accommodate this project. 8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. PUDA-PL20180002813 HAMMOCK PARK MPUD July 13, 2020 Page 13 of 14 Packet Pg. 316 3.C.d This criterion essentially requires an evaluation of the extent to which development standards and deviations proposed for this PUD depart from development standards that would be required for the most similar conventional zoning district. The petitioner is not seeking any new deviations. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): The applicant conducted a NIM meeting on June 8065 Lely Cultural Parkway, Naples, Florida. along with the Agent's team and Applicant. Synopsis. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: 19, 2019, at the South Regional Library located at Approximately 11 residents attended the meeting For further information, see Attachment D - NIM The County Attorney Office has reviewed the Staff Report for this petition on July 13, 2020. RECOMMENDATION: Planning and Zoning Review staff recommends that the CCPC forward Petition PUDA- PL20180002813, Hammock Park MPUD to the BCC with a recommendation of approval. Attachments: Attachment A - Proposed PUD Ordinance Attachment B - Previous Ordinances and Decisions Attachment C - FLUE Consistency Review Attachment D - NIM Synopsis Attachment E -Application Attachment F - Density Exhibit PUDA-PL20180002813 HAMMOCK PARK MPUD July 13, 2020 Page 14 of 14 Packet Pg. 317 3.C.d ll Memorandum To: Timothy Finn, Collier County Zoning Division From: Josephine Medina, AICP, RVi Planning + Landscape Architecture, Inc. Date: May 22, 2024 Subject: Hammock Park MPUD PDI (PL20240000770) Neighborhood Information Meeting Summary RVI Planning + Landscape Architecture, Inc. and Hammock Park Development, LLC conducted a neighborhood informational meeting (NIM) for the Hammock Park Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) Insubstantial Change to a PUD (PDI). The meeting was held on Monday, May 20, 2024, at 5:30 p.m. at the Shepards of the Glades Church, 6020 Rattlesnake Hammock Road, Naples, FL 34113. Approximately eight (8) attendees came to the meeting, including Collier County Staff, the applicant and the applicant's project team. Additionally, two (2) attendees participated via Zoom. A copy of the legal notice, affidavit of publication, a copy of the letter sent to the surrounding property owners and a list of the surrounding property owners are attached as Exhibit "A". In person attendees were provided a presentation using the Master Concept Plan and an Aerial Location Map attached as Exhibit "B". Members who joined online were provided with a six (6) page slide attached as Exhibit "C". At the beginning of the meeting there was only one (1) member of the public present, then two (2) additional members joined online, followed by (1) member of the public appeared in person the project team was about to leave. David Torres, the applicant with Hammock Park Development, LLC, Josephine Medina & Alexis Crespo with RVi Planning + Landscape Architecture explained the application was a request for an insubstantial change to the Hammock Park PDI which meets certain criteria that does not require the change to have to go through the Planning Commission or Board of County Commissioners for approval. They explained that the request was to allow a multi -tenant commercial building's parking to be calculated based on the parking calculation for a Shopping Center instead of parking being calculated per individual tenant. The definition of a Shopping Center within the LDC is development with 20,000 square feet and 8 tenants which is not met by the proposed commercial building. The request would allow for the minimum 15,000 square foot and 7 tenant/unit building to not have to go through a County administrative review process to change the parking calculations every time there is a new tenant that leases out a space. The PDI process was explained including the anticipated HEX hearing date of June 13, 2024. RVi Planning + Landscape Architecture • 28100 Bonita Grande Drive, Sutie 305 • Bonita Springs, FL 34135 • 239. • www.rviplanning.com Packet Pg. 318 3.C.d Questions from the public included the following and no questions were asked within the virtual meeting chat box: 1. If this was the location of the proposed Costco? Response: It was identified that this was not the location of the Costco as this was only a 2.75 Acre property and would be too small to be the location of the Costco. 2. How many square feet is the proposed development? Response: Approximately 15,000 square feet. 3. What type of uses typically would be? Response: Neighborhood commercial uses such as nail salon. 4. What is the location of this request? Is this property located on the southside of Rattlesnake Hammock? Response: No. This property is located on the north side of Rattlesnake Hammock directly across from the Publix and to the north of the 7-11 gas station. The meeting concluded at approximately 5:45 pm. RM Planning + Landscape Architecture 1 2 of 2 Hammock Park MPUD PDI Packet Pg. 319 3.C.d NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING The public is invited to attend a neighborhood information meeting held by RVi Planning + Landscape Architecture, Inc. on behalf of Hammock Park Development, LLC at the following time and location: Monday, May 20, 2024, at 5:30 p.m. Shepherd of the Glades Church 6020 Rattlesnake Hammock Road, Naples, FL 34122 Attending virtually is also available via Zoom. Please visit www.zoom.us, click on "Join A Meeting" in the top right corner, and enter Zoom Meeting ID: 844 8688 4154, Passcode: 0000. Please be advised that Hammock Park Development, LLC has filed an application (PL20240000770) with Collier County. This application is seeking approval of an Insubstantial Change to a Planned Unit Development (PDI). The Application one (1) new deviation (Deviation #8), specifically to allow a commercial center with 7 tenants/units and 15,000 SF of floor area or more to be treated as a shopping center for the purposes of parking calculations. The portion of the Hammock Park MPUD which is subject to this request comprises of 2.75 +/- acres and is generally located on the northeast corner of Collier Boulevard (CR 951) and Rattlesnake Hammock Road an incorporated Collier County, Florida PROJECT LOCATION MAP ubjed Property WE VALUE YOUR INPUT The purpose and intent of this Neighborhood Information Meeting is to provide the public with notice of an impending zoning application and to foster communication between the applicant and the public. The expectation is that all attendees will conduct themselves in such a manner that their presence will not interfere with the orderly progress of the meeting. Packet Pg. 320 3.C.d Business and property owners and residents are welcome to attend the presentation and discuss the project with the owners' representatives. If you are unable to attend this meeting, but have questions or comments, they can be directed to: RVi Planning + Landscape Architecture, Inc. c/o Josephine Medina 28100 Bonita Grande Dr., Suite 305, Bonita Springs, FL 34135 (239) 908-3421 OR Jmedina(o)-RViPlan ning.com Packet Pg. 321 3.C.d LocaliQ Florida GANNETT AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Waldrop Engineering P.A. Alexis Crespo ATTN: Alexis Crespo RVI Planning, Inc 28100 Bonita Grande DR STE 305 Bonita Springs FL 34135-6219 STATE OF WISCONSIN, COUNTY OF BROWN Before the undersigned authority personally appeared, who on oath says that he or she is the Legal Advertising Representative of the Naples Daily News, a newspaper published in Collier County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being a Legal Ad in the matter of Classified Legal CLEGL, was published on the publicly accessible website of Collier and Lee Counties, Florida, or in a newspaper by print in the issues of, on: 05/05/2024 Affiant further says that the website or newspaper complies with all legal requirements for publication in chapter 50, Florida Statutes. Subscribed and sworn to before me, by the legal clerk, who is personally known to me, on 05/05/2024 Leg Jerk Notary, State un rown /C My commission expires Publication Cost: $707.60 Order No: 10142188 Customer No: 1125689 PO #: THIS IS NOT AN INVOICE! Please do not use this form for payment remittance. NANCY HEYRMAN Notary Public State of Wisconsin # of Copies: 1 PO Box 631244 Cincinnati, OH 45263-1244 Page 1 of 2 Packet Pg. 322 3.C.d NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING The public is invited to attend a neighborhood information meeting held by RM Planning + Landscape Architecture, Inc. on behalf of Hammock Park Development, LLC at the following time and location: Monday, May 20, 2024, at 5:30 p.m. Shepherd of the Glades Church 6020 Rattlesnake Hammock Road, Naples, FL 34122 Attending virtually is also available via Zoom. Please visit www zoom.us, click on "Join A Meeting" in the top right corner, and enter Zoom Meeting ID: 844 8688 4154, Passcode: 0000. Please be advised that Hammock Park Development, LLC has filed an application (PL20240000770) with Collier County_ This application is seeking approval of an Insubstantial Change to a Planned Unit Development (PDI). The Application one (1) new deviation (Deviation #8), specifically to allow a commercial center with 7 tenants/units and 15,000 SF of floor area or more to be treated as a shopping center for the purposes of parking calculations. The portion of the Hammock Park MPUD which is subject to this request comprises of 2.75 +/- acres and is generally located on the northeast corner of Collier Boulevard (CR 951) and Rattlesnake Hammock Road an incorporated Collier County, Florida WE VALUE YOUR INPUT The purpose and intent of this Neighborhood Information Meeting is to provide the public with notice of an impending zoning application and to foster communication between the applicant and the public. The expectation is that all attendees will conduct themselves in such a manner that their presence will not interfere with the orderly progress of the meeting. Business and property owners and residents are welcome to attend the presentation and discuss the project with the owners' representatives. If you are unable to attend this meeting, but have questions or comments, they can be directed to: RV Planning + Landscape Architecture, Inc. c/o Josephine Medina 6 28100 Bonita Grande Dr., Suite 305, Bonita Springs, FL 34135 (239) 908-3421 OR Jmedina@RViPlanning.com C a 0 D_ L M a U O E E fC O ti ti O O O O le N O N J Il O 00 00 O N to R •L 0) R Q 7 Y V m r C O r M V .Q Gl 'a a Packet Pg. 323 3.C.d ITV May 3, 2024 RE: Hammock Park MPUD PDI PDI-PL20240000770 Dear Property Owner: Please be advised that Hammock Park Development, LLC has filed an application (PL20240000770) with Collier County. This application is seeking approval of an Insubstantial Change to a Planned Unit Development (PDI). The Application one (1) new deviation (Deviation #8), specifically to allow a commercial center with 7 tenants/units and 15,000 SF of floor area or more to be treated as a shopping center for the purposes of parking calculations. The portion of the Hammock Park MPUD which is subject to this request comprises of 2.75 +/- acres and is generally located on the northeast corner of Collier Boulevard (CR 951) and Rattlesnake Hammock Road an incorporated Collier County, Florida (see attached project location map). In compliance with the Land Development Code requirements, a Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held to provide you an opportunity to hear a presentation about this application and ask questions. The Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held on Monday, May 20, 2024, at 5:30 p.m. at the Shepherd of the Glades Church, 6020 Rattlesnake Hammock Road, Naples, FL 34122. Attending virtually is also available via Zoom. Please visit www.zoom.us, click on "Join A Meeting" in the top right corner, and enter Zoom Meeting ID: 844 8688 4154, Passcode: 0000. The purpose and intent of this Neighborhood Information Meeting is to provide the public with notice of an impending zoning application and to foster communication between the applicant and the public. The expectation is that all attendees will conduct themselves in such a manner that their presence will not interfere with the orderly progress of the meeting. Should you have questions prior to the meeting, please contact me directly at (239) 908- 3421 or JMedinaaRViPlannina.com Thank you, RVii Planning + Landscape Architecture Josephine Medina, AICP Project Manager RVi Planning + Landscape Architecture • 28100 Bonita Grande Drive, Sutie 305 • Bonita Springs, FL 34135 • 239. • www.rviplanning.com Packet Pg. 324 3.C.d PROJECT LOCATION MAP Subject Property Rattlesnake Hammock Road RM Planning + Landscape Architecture 1 2 of 2 Hammock Park MPUD (PDI) PL20240000770 Packet Pg. 325 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING 3.C.d Notice: This data belongs to the Collier County Property Appraiser's Office (CCPA). Therefore, the recipient agrees not to represent this data to anyone as other than CCPA provided data. The recipient may not transfer this data to others without consent from the CCPA. Petition: PL20240000770 I Buffer: 1000' 1 Date: 5/1/24 Site Location: 00416720000 �NAME7 NAME2 NAME3 NAME4 he 4790 SHINNECOCK HILLS CT LLC 815 OCEAN BLVD HAMPTON, NH 03842 --- 0 526590062, 0 f ADKINS, WILLIAM F & MARY ELLEN 1010 SAINT ANDREWS CIR GENEVA, IL 60134 --- 0 526590061, BALDWIN, BARRY J & LINDA H 6006 BUENA VISTA ROAD GAP, PA 17527 --- 0 Y 5265900621 to BL KEMPER HOLDINGS INC 433 KINZER AVE #450 GE NEW HOLLAND, PA 17555 --- 0 526590093, 0 BOLES TR, BRUCE & LINDA BRUCE BOLES TRUST UTD 01/09/08 1316 SOUTH 185TH CIRCLE OMAHA, NE 68130 --- 0 5265900941 BRITTON (NAPLES) LLC 6688 NORTH CENTRAL SUITE 1400 DALLAS, TX 75206 --- 0 7362010061 E BROAD, PATRICK ANNE DETTMAN-BROAD 33 HIDDEN CREEK CT WILLIAMSVILLE, NY 14221 --- 0 52659006G _ CARMAN DRIVE 15 LLC 7742 ALICO RD FORT MYERS, FL 33912 --- 0 0041700001 CCMR RESPONSIVE LLC RLC RESPONSIVE LLC RLC RESPONSIVE PARTNERS LLC ATTN: BARRY J HASKELL 9777 VITRAIL LN DELRAY BEACH, FL 33446 --- 0 0041672011 O CLEVINGER, GARRY G GERALDINE K CLEVINGER 18 LASALLE CT SE NORTH CANTON, OH 44709 --- 0 526590090: ti COLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S NAPLES, FL 34104 --- 0 485860040: p COLLIER HMA INC % ALTUS GROUP PO BOX 92129 SOUTHLAKE, TX 76092 --- 0 0043344001 G CURRAN, KAREN M THOMAS E FEDELI 4810 SHINNECOCK HILLS CT #201 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 526590091 O DENNIS & BECKY BORN FAM TRUST 4810 SHINNECOCK HILLS CT #202 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 526590091, DICOLA, FRANK J & ANNEMARIE G 65 VANECK DR NEW ROCHELLE, NY 10804--- 1203 526590064: p DIVINAGRACIA, THOMAS & LINDA 4795 SHINNECOCK HILL CT # 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 526590062, N DJAG 8625 LLC 8625 COLLIER BLVD NAPLES, FL 34112---0 6203090021 fl DOUGLAS W MURPHY TRUST ANN M PRUNIER TRUST 4825 SHINNECOCK HILLS CT # 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 526590091� .. ELIZABETH M ENGLISH TRUST 2008 222 JEFFERSON BLVD #301 WARWICK, RI 02888 --- 0 526590093� co ESL NAPLES AL OWNER LLC 1550 MARKET ST SUITE 200 DENVER, CO 80202 --- 0 0041776011 00 FALVEY, THOMAS & DIANE 540 GAUGE ST PHOENIXVILLE, PA 19460 --- 0 526590060, pp FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO PROPERTY TAX DEPARTMENT 700 UNIVERSE BLVD, PSX/JB JUNO BEACH, FL 33408 --- 0 0041840061 04 HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES LLC 7742 ALICO RD FORT MYERS, FL 33912 --- 0 251160000: N HAMMOCK PARK APARTMENTS 7742 ALICO ROAD FT MYERS, FL 33912 --- 0 0041672001 HAMMOCK WOODS LLC 12580 UNIVERSITY DR STE 102 FORT MYERS, FL 33907--- 5686 736201004 i HAWKINS, EDWIN A & USE 4825 SHINNECOCK HILLS CT # 102 NAPLES, FL 34112--- 7991 5265900921 4) HIGDON, MARK W & PATRICIA M 4770 SHINNECOCK HILLS CT #201 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 5265900601 M HOUGH, JAMES E & JANE A 4825 SHINNECOCK HILLS CT #202 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 526590092, 2 JOE & SUSAN LIVING TRUST 4815 SHINNECOCK HILLS CT #102 NAPLES, FL 34112--- 7990 52659009Z CL KATHRYN A DIETZ LIV TRUST 4780 SHINNECOCK HILLS CT #202 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 5265900611 Y KINNER, ELIZABETH JANE 4805 SHINNECOCK HILLS CT # 102 NAPLES, FL 34112--- 7978 5265900931 tj KNIGHT, STEVEN R 210 SEQUOYAH TRL HENDERSONVILLE, TN 37075 --- 0 526590061: mi LAKE MICHIGAN CREDIT UNION PO BOX 2848 GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49501---0 620309003: LATIGO NAPLES LLC 11845 W OLYMPIC BLVD STE 515W LOS ANGELES, CA 90064 --- 0 0041680001 LOUGHERY, STEPHEN J CHRISTINE F LOUGHERY 3710 SAPHIRE COVE CIR NAPLES, FL 34114 --- 0 3137400161 �0—, MATSON III, DUFFIELD W & SARAH 4960 SUNSET DR MIAMI, FL 33143 --- 0 004184000, V MCCREEDY, EDWIN J & LINDA 67 THORNBROOKE DR SHREWSBURY, NJ 07702 --- 0 526590063, MENDOZA, RAUL & MONIQUE 48 HAMILTON ST ROCKVILLE CENTRE, NY 11570--- 2037 526590063� MENICHINI, MARIE L 27 BIG WOODS DR GLEN MILLS, PA 19342 --- 0 526590092' C MHP COLLIER LTD 601 BRICKEL KEY DR # 700 MIAMI, FL 33131 --- 0 251160005 , MHP FL VII LLLP 601 BRICKELL KEY DR #700 MIAMI, FL 3313 --- 0 251160004: u MICHAEL W VALENTE REV TRUST DOREEN S VALENTE REV TRUST 5433 EAST BERNEIL DR PARADISE VALLEY, AZ 85253 --- 0 5265900901 MILLER, ROBERT S & MARY C 1680 MEETING HOUSE RD HARTSVILLE, PA 18974 --- 0 526590091: MORGUELAN, JAMES S PAMELA S CARTER 4775 SHINNECOCK HILLS CT #202 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 526590064 t NAPELS LAKES COMM PROP LLC 2501 S MACDILL AVE TAMPA, FL 33629 --- 0 620309004 NAPLES COLLIER BLVD OWNER LLC 2500 BEE CAVES RD BLDG 1 STE 380 AUSTIN, TX 78746 --- 0 0041740001 L) NAPLES LAKES COMM PROP LLC 2501 S MACDILL AVE TAMPA, FL 33629 --- 0 620309004: �. NAPLES LAKES COUNTRY CLUB HOMEOWNERS ASSOC INC 4784 NAPLES LAKES BLVD NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 620300003� Q NAPLES LAKES COUNTRY CLUB INC 4784 NAPLES LAKES BLVD NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 620300000, r PATRICK J & RENEE D KEHOE TRST 4800 SHINNECOCK HILLS CT #202 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 526590090 r PAVENTO REV TRUST 4785 SHINNECOCK HILLS CT # 202 NAPLES, FL 34112--- 7976 5265900641 d PRO RESOURCE RESRC DEV INC PO BOX 768 EFFINGHAM, IL 62401 --- 0 620309002, E PUGLIESE, DANIEL M & ANGIE V 4790 SHINNECOCK HILLS CT #201 NAPLES, FL 34112--- 7992 526590062, v PX REALTY LLC 254 KATONAH AVE KATONAH, NY 10583 --- 0 620309000: w QUEENIN, JASON P JONATHAN QUEENIN 440 FALLEY DRIVE WESTFIELD, MA 01085 --- 0 5265900631 Q RACETRAC INC ATTN PROPERTY TAX DEPT 200 GALLERIA PARKWAY SE STE 900 ATLANTA, GA 30339 --- 0 736201005 RG AUT01 LLC 15275 COLLIER BLVD #201-542 NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 7362010051 ROBERT J MCKENNA REV TRUST 23702 SHANNONDELL DR AUDUBON, PA 19403 --- 0 52659006283 RODNEY P BARIKMO & MARILYN E BARIKMO REV TRUST 4815 SHINNECOCK HILLS CT #101 NAPLES, FL 34112--- 7990 52659009264 Hammock Park Mailing List Packet Pg. 326 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING 3.C.d SAPPHIRE COVE HO ASSOC INC 4670 CARDINAL WAY NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 31374000022 S-H NAPLES DEVELOPMENT PROPCO LLC % DISCOVERY MANAGEMENT GROUP 27599 RIVERVIEW CENTER BLVD STE 201 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 736201006: SHULL FAMILY TRUST 4810 SHINNECOCK HILLS CT UNIT 101 NAPLES, FL 34112--- 7984 5265900911 SIERRA MEADOWS LLC 15 PARADISE PLAZA #285 SARASOTA, FL 34239 --- 0 736201005' Y SIERRA MEADOWS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSN INC 24600 S TAMIAMI TRL # 212 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 736201006: L O SIERRA MEADOWS PROPERTY INC 12580 UNIVERSITY DR STE 102 FORT MYERS, FL 33907--- 5686 736201000: IZ SLATTERY, RICHARD B MARYELLEN SLATTERY 4780 SHINNECOCK HILLS CT NAPLES, FL 34112--- 7982 5265900611 Y STEVE P SLIFKO TRUST 6570 TELURIDE DR WHITE LAKES, MI 48383 --- 0 526590061; STOCKTON TR, EUGENE M BARBARA J STOCKTON TR 4775 SHINNECOCK HILLS CT #102 NAPLES, FL 34112--- 7968 O 526590064 0 TESI, JOSEPH J & JOANNE 4770 SHINNECOCK HILLS CT #101 NAPLES, FL 34112--- 7981 526590060: E TRACT L DEVELOPMENT LLC 7742 ALICO ROAD FORT MYERS, FL 33912 --- 0 0041776001 VANNELLI FAMILY REV TRUST 4775 SHINNECOCK HILLS CT #201 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 5265900641 = WALTRIP, GREG & DIANE WILMA VOGLINO 4800 SHINNECOCK HILLS CT # 102 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 526590090, WATSON, MICHAEL P & KRISTIN A 1030 LAKEVIEW DRIVE MISHAWAKA, IN 46545 --- 0 526590093, O WICKES, GWENDOLYN H 4795 SHINNECOCK HILLS CT # 201 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 526590063, ti WILMA J VOGLINO LIV TRUST 4815 SHINNECOCK HILLS CT #202 NAPLES, FL 34112--- 7990 526590093: O WILSON, JAMES K WILSON, JANIS L 4795 SHINNECOCK HILL CT #202 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 526590063: p ZAPPIA, RICCARDO 3714 SAPPHIRE COVE CIR NAPLES, FL 34114 --- 0 313740016, O STANG, PEGGY DIANE DOUGLAS JAMES STANG 11 LAGUNA PKWY #33 BRECHIN LOK 1 BO CANADA 313740016 N O N J a co 00 00 00 N Hammock Park Mailing List I Packet Pg. 327 4790 SHINNECOCK HILLS CT LLC 815 OCEAN BLVD HAMPTON, NH 03842 --- 0 BL KEMPER HOLDINGS INC 433 KINZER AVE #450 GE NEW HOLLAND, PA 17555 --- 0 BROAD, PATRICKANNE DETTMAN- BROAD 33 HIDDEN CREEK CT WILLIAMSVILLE, NY 14221 --- 0 CLEVINGER, GARRY G GERALDINE K CLEVINGER 18 LASALLE CT SE NORTH CANTON, OH 44709 --- 0 CURRAN, KAREN M THOMAS E FEDELI 4810 SHINNECOCK HILLS CT #201 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 DIVINAGRACIA, THOMAS & LINDA 4795 SHINNECOCK HILL CT # 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 ELIZABETH M ENGLISH TRUST 2008 222 JEFFERSON BLVD #301 WARWICK, RI 02888 --- 0 FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO PROPERTY TAX DEPARTMENT 700 UNIVERSE BLVD, PSX/JB JUNO BEACH, FL 33408 --- 0 HAMMOCK WOODS LLC 12580 UNIVERSITY DR STE 102 FORT MYERS, FL 33907--- 5686 HOUGH, JAMES E & JANE A 4825 SHINNECOCK HILLS CT #202 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 ADKINS, WILLIAM F & MARY ELLEN 1010 SAINTANDREWS CIR GENEVA, IL 60134 --- 0 BOLES TR, BRUCE & LINDA BRUCE BOLES TRUST UTD 01 /09/08 1316 SOUTH 185TH CIRCLE OMAHA, NE 68130 --- 0 CARMAN DRIVE 15 LLC 7742 ALICO RD FORT MYERS, FL 33912 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S NAPLES, FL 34104 --- 0 DENNIS & BECKY BORN FAM TRUST 4810 SHINNECOCK HILLS CT #202 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 DJAG 8625 LLC 8625 COLLIER BLVD NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 ESL NAPLES AL OWNER LLC 1550 MARKET ST SUITE 200 DENVER, CO 80202 --- 0 HACENDA LAKES OF NAPLES LLC 7742 ALICO RD FORT MYERS, FL 33912 --- 0 HAWKINS, EDWIN A & USE 4825 SHINNECOCK HILLS CT # 102 NAPLES, FL 34112--- 7991 JOE & SUSAN LIVING TRUST 4815 SHINNECOCK HILLS CT #102 NAPLES, FL 34112--- 7990 3.C.d BALDWIN, BARRYJ & LINDA H 6006 BUENA VISTA ROAD GAP, PA 17527 --- 0 BRITTON (NAPLES) LLC 6688 NORT CENTRAL SUITE 1400 DALLAS, TX 75206 --- 0 CCMR RESPONSIVE LLC RLC RESPONSIVE LLC 9777 VITRAIL LN DELRAY BEACH, FL 33446 --- 0 COLLIER HMA INC % ALTUS GROUT PO BOX 92129 SOUTHLAKE, TX 76092 --- 0 DICOLA, FRANK J & ANNEMARIE G VANECK DR NEW ROCHELLE, NY 10804 --- 120 DOUGLASW MURPHYTRUSTANN PRUNIER TRUST 4825 SHINNECOCK HILLS CT # 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 FALVEY, THOMAS & DIANE 540 GAUGE ST PHOENIXVILLE, PA 19460 --- 0 HAMMOCK PARK APARTMENTS 77Z ALICO ROAD FT MYERS, FL 33912 --- 0 HIGDON, MARK W & PATRICIA M 4770 SHINNECOCK HILLS CT #201 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 KATHRYN A DIETZ LIV TRUST 4780 SHINNECOCK HILLS CT #202 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 Packet Pg. 328 KINNER, ELIZABETH JANE 4805 SHINNECOCK HILLS CT# 102 NAPLES, FL 34112--- 7978 LATIGO NAPLES LLC 11845 W OLYMPIC BLVD STE 515W LOS ANGELES, CA 90064 --- 0 MCCREEDY, EDWIN J & LINDA 67 THORNBROOKE DR SHREWSBURY, NJ 07702 --- 0 MHP COLLIER LTD 601 BRICKEL KEY DR # 700 MIAMI, FL 33131 --- 0 MILLER, ROBERT S & MARY C 1680 MEETING HOUSE RD HARTSVILLE, PA 18974 --- 0 NAPLES COLLIER BLVD OWNER LLC 2500 BEE CAVES RD BLDG 1 STE 380 AUSTIN, TX 78746 --- 0 NAPLES LAKES COUNTRY CLUB INC 4784 NAPLES LAKES BLVD NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 PRO RESOURCE RESRC DEV INC PO BOX 768 EFFINGHAM, IL 62401 --- 0 QUEEN IN, JASON PJONATHAN QUEENIN 440 FALLEY DRIVE WESTFIELD, MA 01085 --- 0 ROBERT J MCKENNA REV TRUST 23702 SHANNONDELL DR AUDUBON, PA 19403 --- 0 KNIGHT, STEVEN R 210 SEQUOYAH TRL HENDERSONVILLE, TN 37075 --- 0 LOUGHERY, STEPHEN J CHRISTINE F LOUGHERY 3710 SAPHIRE COVE CIR NAPLES, FL 34114 --- 0 MENDOZA, RAUL & MONIQUE 48 HAMILTON ST ROCKVILLE CENTRE, NY 11570--- 2037 MHP FL VII LLLP 601 BRICKELL KEY DR #700 MIAMI, FL 3313 --- 0 MORGUELAN, LAMES S PAMELA S CARTER 4775 SHINNECOCK HILLS CT #202 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 NAPLES LAKES COMM PROP LLC 2501 S MAC DILL AVE TAMPA, FL 33629 --- 0 PATRICK J & RENEE D KEHOE TRST 4800 SHINNECOCK HILLS CT #202 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 PUGLIESE, DANIEL M &ANGIE V 4790 SHINNECOCK HILLS CT #201 NAPLES, FL 34112--- 7992 RAC ETRAC INC ATTN PROPERTY TAX DEPT 200 GALLERIA PARKWAY SE STE 900 ATLANTA, GA 30339 --- 0 RODNEY P BARIKMO & MARILYN E BARIKMO REV TRUST 4815 SHINNECOCK HILLS CT #101 NAPLES, FL 34112--- 7990 3.C.d LAKE MICHIGAN CREDIT UNION PO BOX 2848 GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49501 --- 0 MATSON III, DUFFIELD W & SARAH 4960 SUNSET DR MIAMI, FL 33143 --- 0 MENICHINI, MARIE L 27 BIG WOOF DR GLEN MILLS, PA 19342 --- 0 MICHAEL W VALENTE REV TRUST DOREEN S VALENTE REV TRUST 5433 EAST BERNEIL DR PARADISE VALLEY, AZ 85253 --- C NAPELS LAKES COMM PROP LLC 2501 S MAC DILL AVE TAMPA, FL 33629 --- 0 NAPLES LAKES COUNTRY CLUB HOMEOWNERS ASSOC INC 4784 NAPLES LAKES BLVD NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 PAVENTO REV TRUST 4785 SHINNECOCK HILLS CT # 202 NAPLES, FL 34112--- 7976 PX REALTY LLC 254 KATONAH AVE KATONAH, NY 10583 --- 0 RG AUTO1 LLC 15275 COLLIER BLV #201-542 NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 SAPPHIRE COVE HO ASSOC INC 4670 CARDINAL WAY NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 Packet Pg. 329 S-H NAPLES DEVELOPMENT PROPCO LLC 27599 RIVERVIEW CENTER BLVD STE 201 BONITASPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 SIERRA MEADOWS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSN INC 24600 S TAM IAM I TRL # 212 BONITASPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 STEVE P SLIFKO TRUST 6570 TELURIDE DR WHITE LAKES, MI 48383 --- 0 TRACT L DEVELOPMENT LLC 7742 ALICO ROAD FORT MYERS, FL 33912 --- 0 WATSON, MICHAEL P & KRISTIN A 1030 LAKEVIEW DRIVE MISHAWAKA, IN 46545 --- 0 WILSON, JAMES K WILSON, JANIS L 4795 SHINNECOCK HILL CT #202 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 SHULL FAMILY TRUST4810 SHINNECOCK HILLS CT UNIT 101 NAPLES, FL 34112--- 7984 SIERRA MEADOWS PROPERTY INC 12580 UNIVERSITY DR STE 102 FORT MYERS, FL 33907--- 5686 STOCKTON TR, EUGENE M BARBARA J STOCKTON TR 4775 SHINNECOCK HILLS CT #102 NAPLES, FL 34112--- 7968 VANNELLI FAMILY REV TRUST 4775 SHINNECOCK HILLS CT #201 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 WICKES, GWENDOLYN H 4795 SHINNECOCK HILLS CT # 201 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 ZAPPIA, RICCARDO 3714 SAPPHIRE COVE CIR NAPLES, FL 34114 --- 0 3.C.d SIERRA MEADOWS LLC 15 PARADISE PLAZA #285 SARASOTA, FL 34239 --- 0 SLATTERY, RICHARD B MARYELLEN SLATTERY 4780 SHINNECOCK HILLS CT NAPLES, FL 34112--- 7982 TESI, JOSEPH J & JOANNE 4770 SHINNECOCK HILLS CT #101 NAPLES, FL 34112--- 7981 WALTRIP, GREG & DIANE WILMA VOGLINO 4800 SHINNECOCK HILLS CT # 102 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 WILMA J VOGLINO LIV TRUST 4815 SHINNECOCK HILLS CT #202 NAPLES, FL 34112--- 7990 STANG, PEGGY DIANE DOUGLAS JAMES STANG 11 LAGUNA PKWY #33 BRECHIN LOK 1 BO CANADA Packet Pg. 330 EXHIBIT B J ICA I I I i EXISTING �OLLIER PRODUCTPN WEL ZONING: PUD EXISTING LAND USE: COMMERCIAL (NAPLES LAKES VILLAGE CENTER) FLU: URBAN I RESIDENTIAL SUB -DISTRICT MIXED USE ACTIVITY CENTER EXISTING 12"�_; FORCE MAIN ZONING: PUD EXISTING LAND USE: SIERRA MEADOWS COMMERCIAL+ RESIDENTIAL FLU: URBAN RESIDENTIAL SUB -DISTRICT MIXED USE ACTIVITY CENTER I � EXISTING 36" WATER MAIN 1 j ACCESS EASEMENT { OR 4474, PG 1232 OR 5705, PG148 { BUFFER PER LDC AT TIME OF SDP OR PLAT i I � I I I i I I C/MU i I I�BUFFER PER LDC AT I TIME OF SDP OR PLAT I I EASEMENT OR5056, PG3544 ZONING: MPUD EXISTING LAND USE: VACANT (GOOD TURN CENTER MPUD) FLU: URBAN RESIDENTIAL FRINGE MIXED USE ACTIVITY CENTER f--Y------ t t t t t t t t t J ILL UL I 4w-. .m 1.63± AC t t t t t t t t t t JIL JII• JIL -- .- JII• JII• -_-__- BUFFER PER LDC AT TIME OF SDP OR PLAT �Z;% bW 2Wcwn a Z O o C/MU (1) 1 L °Wo BUFFER PER LDC AT TIME OF SDP OR PLAT NORTH Z = =e �x W W _z Y Z p W SCALE: 1"=200' � Y V O _6' RESERVATION _ (SEE NOTE 2) O Q O O O a O ZONING: PUD N EXISTING LAND USE N VACANT ��1 (MCMULLEN PUD) w a d FLU: URBAN a/ RESIDENTIAL wl �400 a O FRINGE SUB -DISTRICT Qi co MIXED USE A a 00 v ACTIVITY CENTER Fr F lrl `O/ N a is `EXISTING —_�•.__j1 — ' SIDEWALK RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RD COLLIER COUNTY UTILITY EASEMENT OR 5201, PG2074— OR 5201, PG209090--------------------- ZONING: MPUD EXISTING LAND USE: VACANT COMMERCIAL (HACIENDA LAKES MPUD) FLU: URBAN RESIDENTIAL FRINGE SUB -DISTRICT MIXED USE ACTIVITY CENTER LEGEND INGRESS/ EGRESS PRESERVE FPLEASEMENT / DRY DETENTION TRACT LINE Z Z Z e w w w u 0 0 0 O O O C z z z 2 > > > _ O O O C U U U C w w w u a a a o Packet Pg. 331 I1 a, M i F ' r.. Gopywrite RVI 28100 Bonita Grande Drive Suite 305 Bonita Springs, FL 34135 Tel: 239.405.7777 www.rviplanning.com a Hammock Park MPUD v Collier County, FL . Date: 03/04/2024 RV124000292 a Hammock Park Development, LLC ICA .Z 9 0 200 FEI Information furnished regarding this propert from sources deemed reliable. RVi has not m...._ an independent investigation of these sources and no warranty is made as to the accuracy or completenehe approval.an Packet Pg. 332 EXHIBIT C AM 0 ti ti 0 0 0 0 N 0 N J a to HAMMOCK PAPK w o o N MPUD INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE (PDI) 9 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING MAY 207 2024 llxfi Open the Outdoors Packet Pg. 333 ❑ 2.75+/-acres of 19.13 +/- MPUD ❑ Access from Collier Boulevard ❑ Commercial multi -tenant building ❑ Zoning: Hammock Park Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) ❑ FLU: CR 951/Rattlesnake Hammock Road Mixed Use Activity Center HAMMOCK PARK MPUD PDI Packet Pg. 334 Open the Outdoors 3.C.d .. ❑ Approved in 2020, via Ordinance 2020-039 ❑ 19.13 +/- Acres ❑ Allowing for: ❑ 807000 SF of commercial and up to 265 multifamily dwelling units OR 160,000 SF of commercial ❑ Preserve 1.63 Acres F.Id i II f TV ffu�«G,� wlo� f w1TE\eWn I!/{ 4dRSE14YATl4r} F*C=.r, 4 NT NcrEss F�sEMEnr at�.P�., Ir pR acra. FC �237 ZOMG. MPL D @LFFPER PER LAG OR 37G6, PG W EXISTIN13 LAND USE: VACANT A7 TIME OF �ju BUFFER PER LPC AT TIME LGCOO TURN GErrrER MPL" SOP On PLAT OF SOP OR PLAT FLU. URBAN RESIDENTIAL FRINGE RGkLE r.. +1b' MIXED WE AiMyin Gfirc7EA - - ---'• aRESERwnnoe - ___-__._£---- y � ISEE NOTE ?} 1.63± AC .� .�. ___ ___...__ >-.04NCY Rd 1 immor '4 EXISnn41 sNo+JSE .45lU�FU7C! z .�� duCUU�L� r4rPl Feu u-nkN VMU (1FFUNGE1+1 RE f d0[ Rb NGE ' E4. aS _T WI%EO M A{TINTv {EFlTER IIhYhH4N6 lW{I.IFENCE SUFFER PER LDC A7 MAXINLANe' TIME OF SOP OR PLAT I &IJFIiR PER LCG ATWO&UFENCE TIME OF SOP OR PLILT I-------- ------------ ------- - —_____. _ PATTLE&NUE FummOCK kD Q ORwosc. unurruxrvar OR 17N..G5pT+ ar net..c.moo : MPUD INWrE fLee USG "t-MNOT, 0K[%kWUDU P_V UR91N RE WEWTI� FRFJ3E SUB-11MRICT MIXED USE N�WrrY GENTM 1NQkL%ejfiGAi S PRESERVE 7 ppr DETENTION "ACT LN! L HAMMOCK PARK MPUD PDI 13V i Open the Outdoors Packet Pg. 135 ❑ Request is specific to the NW corner parcel ❑ Request to allow for parking for a multitenant commercial building with at minimum 7 tenants/units and at least 15,000 SF to be to be calculated as a shopping center. (1 space per 250 SF). ❑ No change to intensity, density, preserve area, approved uses, trip generation or buffers is being requested. .1. , R attlru HAMMOCK PARK MPUD PDI Packet Pg. 336 Open the Outdoors ✓ Filed Insubstantial change to a PUD (PDI) application ✓ Found Sufficient by County Planning Staff ✓ Conduct Required Neighborhood Information Meeting • Hearing Examiner Hearing —June 13 COLLIER COUryry SAC,, GROwrH MANAGCOyERNMENT �'wW.[011ier �,n�MENT OEPARTMENi �RUp NORTH HORSESHbE pR14E INS faaal.i--an FA 3a1oa leCxu6 UBST"I"A'CHANgC TOAPUp Ax {23at rs2. sa xeerlpl t°,aI.13 E d not sndnt [n LOC sub Ch'3G.3 nl fhe gdminrewe Orden Lai_29d1� c°nsidered a su section 10A2.13 E2, aae eew and call be 6asetl ulPon an evaluatb PUDsuhstahan$e includes an On the fi pprOl'al of the Hearn ntial cha Y cha ndings and 8 Exa n of LDC suhsecti n8e tp an °$e that is diteri miner. °n 10.U2.13 appr°ved PUD P a used for the original Ppl a[ring aminer-s e 1 and shall require the ETITION NO ron. approval shall be based PROIE[T NAME DAZE pill,CESSED Tae� vrerrrarxarry Name A"LI[gNT[OWAnIN Of Property IVI Owner(xj; FORMATIDIR Address f Applicant if differem than owner; Telephone; E-Mail Adtlres-[e1L• -State: ZIP: t Name OfARen- Far: Firm; Address: _ Telephone: E-Mail Address: -Cell-Stater � DP: Dn as, ched DETAIL OF REQUEST suhsecti the eq a doe�r,°otthe application, describ 42,13 E ] meet the POD sups a the Insubstantial Reel tantial than Change request, �tl3/b/20]a $e criteria established in iDC Page t ot4 HAMMOCK PARK MPUD PDI 13V i Open the Outdoors Packet Pg. 337 3.C.d HAMMOCK PARK MPUD PDI lixf i Open the Outdoors Packet Pg. 338 3.C.e Collier County Growth Management Community Development Department Zoning Division CONSISTENCY REVIEW MEMORANDUM To: Tim Finn, Planner III, Zoning From: Jessica Malloy, Planner II, Comprehensive Planning Date: May 22, 2024 Subject: Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Consistency Review PETITION NUMBER: PL20240000770 PETITION NAME: Hammock Park MPUD (PDI) REQUEST: To amend the Hammock Park MPUD Master Plan, originally approved via Ordinance Number 2007-30, for the purposes of including a deviation to allow a multi -tenant commercial building to be calculated using the required parking for a Shopping Center as set by Land Development Code (LDC) 4.05.04 G. Table 17, Shopping Centers. This method of calculating parking is based on the square footage of the structure as opposed to the use of each individual unit. LOCATION: The ±19.0-acre Hammock Park MPUD is located on the northeast corner of Collier Boulevard (CR 951) and Rattlesnake Hammock Road (CR 864), in Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, in Collier County, Florida. COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMENTS: The subject property exists within the designated area of the Mixed Use Activity Center #7, as identified on the countywide Future Land Use Map (FLUM) of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). The Hammock Park MPUD and all subsequent amendments were found to be consistent with the Growth Management Plan. Specific to this petition, the FLUE does not specify any policies relative to parking requirements. Relevant FLUE Objectives and policies are stated below (in italics); each policy is followed by staff analysis [in bold]. FLUE Policy 5.6: New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code (Ordinance 04-41, adopted June 22, 2004, and effective Consistency Review Memorandum: Orange Tree PUD (PDI) Page 1 of 2 Growth Management Community Development • Planning & Zoning 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 • 239-252-2400 • www.colliercountvfl.,gov/ Packet Pg. 339 3.C.e October 18, 2004, as amended). [Comprehensive Planning staff leaves this determination to Zoning staff as part of their review of the petition in its entirety to perform the compatibility analysis.] FLUE Objective 7 and Relevant Policies Due to the minor changes proposed (no additions to permitted uses and no increase to intensities nor density) beyond the currently approved Hammock Park MPUD, staff finds that a re-evaluation of FLUE policies under Objective 7 (pertaining to access, interconnections, walkability, etc.) is not necessary. These policies were evaluated during staff's consistency review of the original Hammock Park MPUD petition. CONCLUSION: Based upon the above analysis, the proposed PDI may be deemed consistent with the Future Land Use Element. PETITION ON CITYVIEW cc: Mike Bosi, AICP, Director, Zoning Division James Sabo, AICP, Planning Manager, Comprehensive Planning Section Ray Bellows, Planning Manager, Zoning Services Section Consistency Review Memorandum: Orange Tree PUD (PDI) Page 2 of 2 Growth Management Community Development • Planning & Zoning 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 • 239-252-2400 • www.colliercountvfl.,gov/ Packet Pg. 340 3.C.f P town am oky" 11m vall"it (CHAPTER 8, COLLIER COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT) A zoning sign(s) must be posted by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent on the parcel for a minimum of fifteen (15) calendar days in advance of the first public hearing and said sign(s) must be maintained by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent through the Board of County Commissioners Hearing. Below are general guidelines for signs, however these guidelines should not be construed to supersede any requirement of the LDC. For specific sign requirements, please refer to the Administrative Code, Chapter 8 E. The sign(s) must be erected in full view of the public, not more than five (5) feet from the nearest street right-of-way or easement. The sign(s) must be securely affixed by nails, staples, or other means to a wood frame or to a wood panel and then fastened securely to a post, or other structure. The sign may not be affixed to a tree or other foliage. The petitioner or the petitioner's agent must maintain the sign(s) in place, and readable condition until the requested action has been heard and a final decision rendered. If the sign(s) is destroyed, lost, or rendered unreadable, the petitioner or the petitioner's agent must replace the sign(s NOTE: AFTER THE SIGN HAS BEEN POSTED, THIS AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE SHOULD BE RETURNED NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORKING DAYS BEFORE THE FIRST HEARING DATE TO THE ASSIGNED PLANNER AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER BEFORE THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, PERSONALLY APPEARED J�K CQ t.' ectnq WHO ON OATH SAYS THAT HE/SHE HAS POSTED PROPER NOTICE AS REQUI ED BY SECTION 10,03.00 OF THE QQL.LIERCQUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE ON THE PARCEL COVERED IN PETITION NUMBER. Z S 1' F APPLICANT OR AGENT �C�2P1n;i:Yve- [Y�e��vL� NAME (TYPED OR PRINTED) STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COMAERPINELLAS STREET OR P.O. BOX 80i+e— VS hr4a fyv-sl CITY, STATE ZIP `J The foregoing instrument was sworn to and subscribed before me this 29th day of May , 20 24 , by Josephine Medina , personally known to me or who produced is personally known to me as identification and who did/&dMM take an oath. tr 'r SANDRA KAY FABPJZIO ':� Notary Public State of Florida } Commission x HH 370063 a My Comm. Expires Mar 6, 2027 Bonded through National Notary Assn. My Commission Expires: (Stamp with serial number) Signature of Notary Public Sandra K. Fabrizio Printed Name of Notary Public c co d a 0 a at c �L M m w c m E t v Q c d E z a Rev. 3/4/2015 Packet Pg. 341 4 ti e HBO 8 Lh ID L-,.j & EJ EE �l !A jr dL IL IL J1 A A I 0 dr Poor- -PWL I pt Lr6 —ere % 11w, % % IL 4')CP4. r-'m. Z�' % ti ql -T. ;7kd 0 2w r rf k7' q, %1% r: % I % IL F I % lk. % 1� �6 -ef > k L % % .0 %.r %•% ?L % L L 0.%%.- 'j" - I n % % % % % 'Tel IL jr rZ'r.IL' r P. % % 16 �6 L A' % , % Y % X. r T- L 6 - c J7 % . I'. r % Y% t y l• M1r' L y r { 4 + Y e7•�' . t .Lis.• ?ram � i PUBLIC HF.AR11 HAMMOCK PAF PUD INSUBSTANTI, Petition No. PL20.e. HEX: June 13, 202d EE .E Collier County Growth FE c� INS 2800 North Horseshoe C Timothy Finn, Planner I 6 NU BUD unKir. III jV+� sy�F + �cJ•5 i}—- " r tip'• `� �'S 4 . :�.- �. i � •S•M1 �}f- - �' - L �' a •''� •r 's�711+. •� �'F x+, .TrL-'L�• �i{�F'• � `�j•�5�� T _ ; y • L l ''i� •�,.' .ate _ . rti � 'L w'�-} Ia ��V � 1 _ ' J •�.. - .�, , _. .�;y`_ -� j�.'. �+ 5�. � ,. �• f� �M1} .�1 Lk - -: - -`.� P. po C-A of . - _ _ �•. ' a _ - ?'_ .� k•'s �. .,fir• k��~!� - }� r �r- ti v job ��=i�k�� F ;� �k•#" j �_• h � or; •, Yt � yam• - ... � - Y �� ••rs' _ 'rr�'ti •'�'ti' �y�: -7�i '' _ ry: �. �,Y� CZ, 7 ;.�� 'C � ff� Ll�. ¢f�•• ar'' '•r' �� - + ti - I �.� ;4'• �r JY'. 'yr � +y ~ � .�•. SX r � - __ +� ,.Ilr J •1 S ��+` ! �•ir�cs�• �,�..+ �y5 r. i ' 4 rfhrli J i •r .L+! A r 1 I" 2 -.I �L'.�4 k y�Ly 4` '%LA tF,•.+ .r_ r ' • ••y_ ' '+r -. ' ' �S . I r' 1 _ 1'• +�L .r. .-R �•+ '�#''�•-.-4 _•�•_- L 1 + _ I �'i' f l %.l - iK+': F 'A._aY I K�.r;6 r-�•..�'��. k r';� i k• �. +'.I a a � � R . _ � . � •� •�• _ M1 � � �' ter.. � f _ �� ` �r'f I �: � L• � ~ �� I } - + _ .� � _ �' `• f � I -'F� F . _ 4�� {f�r� �t•' t r _ .� . � {'� •yr•_ •'•' _ , �� i. •— 'II f. ' ' .� y - .'L 1�r•' � .� • •k - � � '� '' - •� i'• y •,- - _ k -F' - 'IL •.r T ' i , -•L%' .ti M _z'r - '4,~••�• yl 1~ s. c `•r" `. i �• i• _ I •_I• .r,._.l?'+ t { _ !�`t. I •� I •�' si.•. �1` { � �, .. "I; ,. •�,—y! { = � --._�•• � {f_ �:.'• S :•�' �'�� • �- �.�} �ti �' �•. L:' .-k � Jy,i � 4 � � x,i •� ��. +3 •' 1-'f�`+ti '� 1._r• � 'ik �.r�i� �. � z.�y kr� II ,-a � i + � ',}�` I * i•� �74 � F �[ L J�• 'TM #!kJ �• L1/'� • f.'. � ',. •! ti �� _:. 1 . � L� r• c • • .�_�`. a ' � — fr ' i- •1J r.•,'' f i i f + v ` a S ' 11 fa _ r + + f { - +.' T E�� 4 �lM1 r'r 1 I �s .. ' rr � vl { 's -.!r 1 % . _ ■ ' v. \ 1 .'r F I- W 06/13/2024 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Hearing Examiner Item Number: 3.1) Doc ID: 29015 Item Summary: PETITION NO. PDI-PL20230016103 - Hacienda Lakes - Request for an insubstantial change to the Hacienda Lakes Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (RPUD), Ordinance No. 11-41, as amended, to decrease the minimum floor area size from 750 square feet to 650 square feet for multi -family dwelling units; and to remove the temporary 3:00 P.M. peak hour trip cap at the connection to Collier Boulevard by adding the following sentence to Transportation Commitment IV, "Upon the commitment of construction of Benfield Road [now known as Hacienda Blvd] for connectivity inn the north area, this restriction shall no longer be in effect." The subject f20- acre parcel is part of the f2,262-acre PUD; and sits on the east side of Collier Boulevard approximately 2,500 feet north of Hacienda Lakes Parkway in Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East in unincorporated Collier County. [Coordinator: Eric Ortman, Planner 111] Commissioner District 1 Meeting Date: 06/13/2024 Prepared by: Title: Principal Planner — Zoning Name: Eric Ortman 05/24/2024 9:15 AM Submitted by: Title: Zoning Director — Zoning Name: Mike Bosi 05/24/2024 9:15 AM Approved By: Review: Operations & Regulatory Management Diane Lynch GMCDD Reviewer Unknown Jaime Cook GMCDD Reviewer Zoning Ray Bellows Review Item Zoning Diane Lynch Review Item Operations & Regulatory Management Michael Stark Review Item Hearing Examiner (GMD Approvers) David Merino Review Item Zoning Mike Bosi Division Director Hearing Examiner Andrew Dickman Meeting Pending Skipped 05/29/2024 12:12 PM Completed 05/30/2024 9:15 AM Completed 05/31/20244:38 PM Skipped 05/31/2024 6:11 PM Completed 06/03/2024 12:09 PM Completed 06/03/2024 12:42 PM Completed 06/03/2024 2:23 PM 06/13/2024 9:00 AM Packet Pg. 344 3.D.a ic Collier County STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FROM: ZONING DIVISION — ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: JUNE 13, 2024 SUBJECT: PDI-PL20230016103, HACIENDA LAKES PUD APPLICANT/AGENT: Owner/Applicant: Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC 7742 Alico Road Fort Myers, FL. 34135 Agent: Josephine Medina Rvi Planning + Landscape Architecture 28100 Bonita Grande Drive Bonita Springs, FL. 34135 REQUESTED ACTION: The petitioner requests an insubstantial change (PDI) to Ordinance No. 2011-41, as amended, the Hacienda Lakes Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) to decrease the minimum floor area size from 750 square feet to 650 square feet for multi -family dwellings and to modify language to Transportation Commitment IV to remove the 3:00 P.M. peak hour trip limitation over the bridge connection to the North Area from Collier Boulevard. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject f20-acre parcel is part of the f2,262-acre PUD and sits on the east side of Collier Boulevard, approximately 2,500 feet north of Hacienda Lakes Parkway. The property is in Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, in unincorporated Collier County. (See location map on page 3 and aerial ofparcel on page 4). PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The ±2,262-acre Hacienda Lakes MPUD was originally approved by Ord. 11-41 in conjunction with the Hacienda Lakes Development of Regional Impact (DRI) approved by Res. 11-201. The MPUD/DRI allows for a maximum of 1,760 residential units, 327,500 square feet of commercial retail uses, 70,000 square feet of professional and medical office uses, 135 hotel rooms, 140,000 Packet Pg. 345 3.D.a square feet of business park/educational facilities, a public school, and continuation of the "swamp buggy" attraction. The MPUD may also develop senior housing units by a conversion factor of one residential unit, equating to four senior housing units. The MPUD has had five minor amendments (HEX 14-18, HEX 14-28, HEX 15-06, HEX 16-20, and HEX 21-33), including allowing additional signage, reduced front yard setbacks for secondary front yards, and affordable senior housing. This petition has two objectives. The first is to reduce the minimum floor area requirement for multi -family dwellings from 750 square feet to 650 square feet. The applicant's justification for this is that outdoor patio space will be provided for each unit, which is not counted toward minimum floor area requirements. Inclusive of the outdoor patio area, all units will meet the 750- square-foot requirement. Per the applicant, the "reduction allows for a variety of apartment layouts which provide different levels of affordability and needs for different end users," and "the provision of outdoor space for each unit allows for a better quality of life and private enjoyment of the Florida weather. " The second objective is to clarify that a developer commitment made in Ord. 11-41 was meant to be temporary, and its removal was contingent upon a commitment to the construction of Benfield Road (now Hacienda Boulevard) for connectivity in the North Area. The clarification is achieved by adding the following sentence. "Upon the commitment of construction of Benfield [now known as Hacienda Blvd] for connectivity in the north area, this restriction shall no longer be in effect." Attachment 1 shows both proposed changes as excerpts from Ord. 11-41. Intentionally Blank PDI-PL20230016103, Hacienda Lakes MPUD Page 2 of 7 Packet Pg. 346 3.D.a Location Map idr-T cp Lor LN MPUa cr r PIED ne{:� nCumsF Petition Number: PL20 3001 10 Zoning flap PDI-PL20230016103, Hacienda Lakes MPUD Attachment: Staff Report - Hacienda Lakes PDI (29015 : PL20230016103 - PDI - Hacienda Lakes) Page 3 of 7 Packet Pg. 347 3.D.a Aerial of Parcel LAND USE AND ZONING: This section of the staff report identifies the land uses and zoning classifications for properties near the portion of the PUD (blue polygon at center of graphic) affected by the request. The graphic to the right is approximately 8,000 feet east to west and 12,000 feet north to south and totals roughly 2,300 acres. The parcels in the white boxes outlined in purple are undeveloped, zoned agricultural (A) and total approximately 89 acres. All other parcels shown are in one of the many PUDs along both sides of Collier Boulevard. PDI-PL20230016103, Hacienda Lakes MPUD Page 4 of 7 Packet Pg. 348 3.D.a STAFF ANALYSIS: Comprehensive Planning: Because this application is not adding uses or increasing the intensity of the previously approved uses in the Hammock Park MPUD, it is consistent with the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the GMP. Conservation and Coastal Management Element: Environmental staff has evaluated the proposed changes to the PUD documents and found no issue with consistency. Transportation Element: Transportation Planning staff has evaluated the proposed changes. The changes present no transportation related issue with consistency. There is an internal road that links the northern and southern portions of the PUD, as well as additional access points on Collier Boulevard, which render the secondary, 300 PM peak hour trip cap to Collier Boulevard no longer necessary. There are no additional uses proposed, no changes that result in additional trip impacts, and no additional impacts on the adjacent roadways. Therefore, Transportation Planning staff finds the petition consistent with the GMP and recommends approval of the request. LDC Sections 10.02.13.E.1 and 10.02.13.E.2 set forth the criteria by which insubstantial amendments to a PUD Master Plan and/or minor text changes to a PUD document are to be reviewed before they can be approved. The criteria and a response to each are listed below. LDC Section 10.02.13.E.1: a. Is there a proposed change in the boundary of the Planned Unit Development (PUD)? No, there is no proposed change in the boundary of the PUD. b. Is there a proposed increase in the total number of dwelling units, intensity of land use, or height of buildings within the development? No, there is no proposed increase in the number of dwelling units, intensity of land use, or height of buildings within the development. c. Is there a proposed decrease in preservation, conservation, recreation, or open space areas within the development greater than 5% of the total acreage previously designated as such, or five acres in area? No, there is no proposed decrease in preservation, conservation, recreation, or open space areas within the development as designated on the approved Master Plan. d. Is there a proposed increase in the size of areas used for non-residential uses to include Institutional, commercial, and industrial land uses (excluding preservation, conservation, or open space) or a proposed relocation of nonresidential land uses? No, there is no proposed increase to the size of areas used for non-residential uses, and no relocation of non-residential areas. PDI-PL20230016103, Hacienda Lakes MPUD Page 5 of 7 Packet Pg. 349 3.D.a e. Is there a substantial increase in the impacts of the development, which may include but are not limited to increases in traffic generation, changes in traffic circulation, or impacts on other public facilities? No, there are no substantial impacts resulting from this amendment. f. Will the change result in land use activities that generate a higher level of vehicular traffic based upon the Trip Generation Manual published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers? Any additional traffic generated from this amendment will be di minimus. g. Will the change result in a requirement for increased stormwater retention or otherwise increase stormwater discharge? No, the proposed changes will not impact or increase stormwater retention or increase stormwater discharge. h. Will the proposed change bring about a relationship to an abutting land use that would be incompatible with an adjacent land use? No. There will be no incompatible relationships with abutting land uses as there is none proposed to the existing, approved land use. i. Are there any modifications to the PUD Master Plan or PUD Document or amendment to a PUD ordinance which is inconsistent with the Future Land Use Element or other elements of the Growth Management Plan or which modification would increase the density of intensity of the permitted land uses? No. Comprehensive Planning staff determined that Ord. 11-41 was consistent with the FLUE of the GMP (Attachment 2). There will be no change in the density or intensity of development and no change in the list of permitted uses. j. The proposed change is to a PUD district designated as a development of regional impact (DRI) and approved pursuant to F.S. § 380.06, where such change requires a determination and public hearing by Collier County pursuant to F.S. § 380.06(19). Any change that meets the criterion of F.S. §380.06(19)(e)2, and any changes to a DRI/PUD master plan that clearly do not create a substantial deviation shall be reviewed and approved by Collier County under this LDC section 10.02.13 or The PUD is already an approved DRI. This petition makes an insubstantial change to 20 of the ±2,262 acres of the PUD; therefore, the question is not applicable as the petition itself does not raise the level of a regional impact. PDI-PL20230016103, Hacienda Lakes MPUD Page 6 of 7 Packet Pg. 350 3.D.a k. Any modification in the PUD master plan or PUD document or amendment to a PUD ordinance which impact(s) any consideration deemed to be a substantial modification as described under this LDC section 10.02.13. No, this petition is for an insubstantial change to the Hacienda Lakes MPUD and seeks to decrease the minimum floor area requirement for multi -family dwellings and to clarify that Transportation Commitment IV is temporary and can be removed once the commitment is made to construct Hacienda Boulevard for connectivity in the North Area of the PUD. LDC Section 10.02.13.E.2: Insubstantial change determination. An insubstantial change includes any change that is not considered a substantial or minor change. An insubstantial change to an approved PUD ordinance shall be based upon an evaluation of LDC subsection 10.02.13 E.1 The petitioner is proposing to reduce the minimum floor area requirements for multi -family dwellings from 750 to 650 square feet and to clarify that a developer commitment is, in fact, temporary. As such, it is an insubstantial change and successfully meets the criteria of LDC 10.02.13 E.1. DEVIATION DISCUSSION: The petitioner is not seeking any deviations. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): RVi Planning and Landscape Architecture conducted a NIM at the Shepards of the Glades Church located at 6020 Rattlesnake Hammock Road at 5:30 p.m. on May 21, 2024. Approximately ten people attended the NIM in person and another three via Zoom. Questions were asked and answered about the density (not changing), the market rate for the apartments, and the surrounding development. Additional questions were on why the "temporary" restriction on the trip cap over the bridge was being removed and whether Seven Shores (neighboring development) would be finished before Hacienda Blvd. was finished. The meeting concluded shortly before 6:00 P.M. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Collier County Hearing Examiner approve Petition PDI- PL20230016103. Attachments: 1. Changes to Ord. 11-41 in Strikethrough-Underline 2. FLUE Consistency Memo 3. Applicant Backup Materials 4. Legal Ad and Sign Posting PDI-PL20230016103, Hacienda Lakes MPUD Page 7 of 7 Packet Pg. 351 3.D.b TABLE I RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SETBACK SINGLE FAMILY ZERO LOT TWO FAMILY/ TOWNHOUSE MULTI -FAMILY CLUB HOUSE/ RECREATION DETACHED LINE DUPLEX DWELLINGS BLDGS Principal Structures Minimum Lot Area 4,800 SF 4,000 SF 1 t 00 SF per 1,800 SF per lot 1 acre 10,000 SF Minimum Lot width 40' 35' 35' per lot 18' per lot or unit 150' N/A 15' or 15' or BH, 15' or BH, 15' or'/z BH, 15' or BH, 15' or BH, Minimum Distance From BH, whichever is whichever is whichever is whichever is whichever is MPUD Boundary ** whichever is greater. greater. greater. greater. greater. greater. 20" or 15' 20', or 15' 20', or 15' 20' or''/z BH, with side Front Yard Setback load kith side with side 20' whichever is N/A load garages load garages greater. garages Side Yard 5 0' or 10' 0' or 6' 0' or 6' /z BH N/A 15' or''/2 BH, Rear Yard 15' 15' 15' 15' whichever is N/A greater From Preserve 25' 25' 25' 25' 25' 25' Maximum Zoned Height 35' 35' 35' 45' 75' 40' Maximum Actual Height 42' 42' 42' 50' 85' 50' Floor Area Minimum (SF) 1200 SF 1000 SF 1000 SF 900 SF -650 SF N/A 15' or''/z Minimum Distance Between 12' 10, 12' 12' /2 SBH SBH, Principal Structures whichever is greater Accessory Structures Front SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS Side SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS Rear 5' 5' 5' 5' 5' 10, From Preserve 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, Minimum Distance Between Accessory Structures on 0' or 10' 0' or 10' 0' or 10' 0' or 10' 0' or 10' 0' or 10' same lot Minimum Distance Between Accessory and Principal 0' or 10' 0' or 10' 0' or 10' 0' or 10' 0' or 10' 0' or 10' Structures on same lot Maximum Zoned Height SPS SPS SPS SPS 35' SPS Maximum Actual Height SPS SPS SPS SPS 35' SPS 15' or''/2 15' or BH 15' or''/� BH 15' or''/� BH 15' or''/� BH 15' or %BH Minimum Distance From BH whichever is whichever is whichever is whichever is whichever is MPUD Boundary ** whichever greater greater greater greater greater is greater SPS: Same as Principal Structure LL: Lot Line BOC: Back of Curb Paseo: A pedestrian only access way to and from residences. N/A: Not Applicable BH: Zoned Building Height SBH: Sum of Building Heights "Principal and Accessory Uses shall not protrude or encroach into any required landscape buffer Hacienda Lakes MPUD PL20230016103 Last Revised: March 21, 2024 Words stfuek thr-e gl are deleted; Words underlined are added Page 2 Packet Pg. 352 3.D.b of construction, and shall include the fair market value of the land or easement when the Owner conveys the road right of way to the County, free and clear of liens and encumbrances. Fair market value has been determined to be $30,000 per acre. This improvement and the area allowed to develop upon completion of this improvement are depicted in Figure 3, below. Fifty percent (50%) of the cost of this improvement is deemed a site -related improvement. 3—kwun" litee GMI-Canmllmem MI :r.,lrurn~ hp 4qCanrt. xie�eesa+N+wn►a i ^^• ��v++n:+Imlnia.srra+MY6w„r..,�.n gas7rrl Kaman WCK [mMKied Ar%m PawM' 4rftknmd nA.r.14tX NVV� ,d NORTH AREA IV. With no improvement other than a bridge to be constructed by the Owner, at its sole cost and without road impact fee credit, over the water canal that runs parallel to C.R.951 at the northern project site access, the Owner shall be allowed to develop Residential Pod C (not to exceed 300 PM peak hour trips at the connection to C.R.951. Upon the commitment of construction of Benfield [now known as Hacienda Blvdl for connectivity in the north area. this restriction shall no longer be in effect). This improvement and the area allowed to develop upon completion of this improvement are depicted in Figure 4, below. At no time will the County accept ownership of this bridge. This improvement is a site related improvement. Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words s*riek tht! ttg-, are deleted; PL20230016103 Words underlined are added Last Revised: March 21, 2024 Page 5 Packet Pg. 353 3.D.c Co er Cou"ty Growth Management Community Development Department Zoning Division —Comprehensive Planning Section CONSISTENCY REVIEW MEMORANDUM To: Eric Ortman, Planner III, Zoning From: Jessica Malloy, Planner II, Comprehensive Planning Date: April 26, 2023 Subject: Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Consistency Review PETITION NUMBER: PL20230016103 PETITION NAME: Hacienda Lakes MPUD (PDI) REQUEST: This petition requests an Insubstantial Change to a Planned Unit Development (PDI) specifically to amend the Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ord. 2011-41 and Ord. 2022-18 to reduce the minimum floor area for multi -family dwellings and to remove 300 PM peak hour trips at the connection to CR 951 for North Area, Residential Pod C upon completion of the bridge access at Brighton Boulevard. LOCATION: The ±20.21-acre property (Tract FD-1 of the Hacienda North Phase 1 subdivision, parcel number 48590010041) is located on the east side of Collier Boulevard (C.R. 951) .82 miles north of Rattlesnake Hammock Road, in Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 25 East, of Collier County. COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMENTS: The subject property is designated Urban Mixed Use District — Urban Residential Fringe (URF) Subdistrict as identified in the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) and Future Land Use Map (FLUM) supplement of the Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP). The Hacienda Lakes MPUD, originally approved in 2011 and subsequently amended in 2022, were determined to be consistent with the GMP at the time. As the petition does not propose any changes to the density or intensity of the project, the prior determinations made would still apply. In reviewing Policies 5.6 and Objective 7 policies (shown as follows) of the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) staff provides the following analysis in [bracketed bold text.] Packet Pg. 354 3.D.c FLUE Policy 5.6: New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code (Ordinance 04-41, adopted June 22, 2004, and effective October 18, 2004, as amended). [Comprehensive Planning staff leaves this determination to Zoning staff as part of their review of the petition in its entirety to perform the compatibility analysis. FLUE Objective 7 and Relevant Policies: Due to the minor changes proposed (no changes in permitted uses, densities, or intensities) beyond the currently approval staff is of the opinion that a re-evaluation of FLUE policies under Objective 7 (pertaining to access, interconnections, walkability, etc.) is not necessary. CONCLUSION This petition may be deemed consistent with the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the Growth Management Plan. PETITION ON CITYVIEW Packet Pg. 355 Coder county 3.D.d Collier County Planning Commission Agenda Packet Checklist for PUDs to be submitted by Applicants and Agents Please provide the following documents to support your petition request: Materials provided by Planner: • Staff Report • Complete Draft Ordinance /Resolution initialed by County Attorney Materials to be provided by applicant: Application • Narrative of rezone request • Property Information • Property Ownership and general description of site Disclosure of Interest ❑ Affidavit of Unified Control P1Affidavit of Representation ❑ NIM Information (Sign -in sheet, notes, minutes and/or summary, audio or video recording) ❑ Traffic Impact Study (TIS) ❑ Environmental Data ❑ Historical/Archeological Surveyor Waiver ❑ Utility Letter P1Deviation Justifications ❑ Boundary Survey P1Amended PUD Ordinance (the last submitted Ordinance with strikethrough — color preferred) WlOther documents (as needed, on a case -by -case basis) such as relevant prior ordinances, conditional uses, historical documents, any "private or legal" agreements affecting the PUD etc. Write details below. Warranty Deed, Original Rezone Staff Report, Ordinance 2022-18 1 understand that by submitting the above materials, it is the agent/applicant's responsibility to ensure all materials are in the some order for all copies of backup materials to provide to the CCPC and the CD must contain the documents in one pdf file (not multiple files) in the some order as the printed materials. It is the agent's responsibility to ensure no documentation is left out. 05/15/2024 Signature of Agent Representative Date Josephine Medina, RVi Planning + Landscape Architecture Printed Name of Signing Agent Representative Packet Pg. 356 3.D.d HACIENDA LAKES MPUD Collier County Insubstantial Change to a PUD Application (PDI) PDI-PL20230016103 COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER PACKAGE Packet Pg. 357 3.D.d HACIENDA LAKES MPUD PDI-PL20230016103 COVERSHEET & NARRATIVE Packet Pg. 358 iv 3.D.d March 21, 2024 Mr. Eric Ortman, Planner III Planning and Zoning Division Zoning Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 RE: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Insubstantial Change to a Planned Unit Development (PDI) PDI-PL20230016103 Dear Mr. Ortman: Enclosed for your review is an application for an Insubstantial Change to a PUD in regard to the Hacienda Lakes MPUD to allow for the insubstantial change to the minimum floor area for multifamily to 650 square feet. To provide clarifying language identifying the temporary intent of Transportation Commitment 4's limitation of 300 PM peak hour trips at the connection to CR 951 for North Area for POD C until such time a commitment of the construction of Benfield (now known as Hacienda Blvd) has been made. No change to the PUD Master Plan or deviations are proposed with this application. BACKGROUND/EXISTING CONDITIONS In 2011, the Hacienda Lakes properties were rezoned from Rural Agriculture (A) and Agricultural Special Treatment Overlay (A-ST) to Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) pursuant to Ordinance 11-41. The MPUD allows for a maximum of 1,760 dwelling units, 327,500 square feet of commercial retail uses, 70,000 square feet of professional and medical office uses, 135 hotel rooms, 140,000 square feet of business park/educational facilities, a public school, and the Sports Park/swamp buggy attraction. The uses within the PUD are further limited by a trip cap of 3,328 PM peak hour trips. Several areas within the Hacienda Lakes MPUD have been sold and developed, however the 20.21± acre subject Property is currently undeveloped. Since 2011, the MPUD has been amended five times to accommodate ongoing development. See HEX Decisions 2014-18, 2015- 06, 2016-20, 2021-33, and Ordinance 2022-18. REQUEST Hacienda Lakes Apartments, LLC ("Applicant") is requesting Staff's approval of an insubstantial change to the Hacienda Lakes MPUD to allow the reduction of the minimum floor area from 750 to 650 square feet for multifamily dwellings in Table 1, Residential Development Standards. The request also proposes a revision to Transportation Commitment 4 approved per Ordinance 11- 41. The proposed request reduces to the minimum floor area for multifamily dwelling units within Table 1, Residential Development Standards from 750 square feet to 650 square feet. This reduction allows for a variety of apartment layouts which provide different levels of affordability and needs for different end users. Different layouts proposed may include increased or reduced balcony areas. The primary reason for the request is non -air-conditioned space is not counted towards meeting the minimum floor area requirements to arrive at 750 square feet. The Applicant RVi Planning + Landscape Architecture I Page 1 of 4 Hacienda Lakes MPUD PDI Packet Pg. 359 3.D.d is proposing to provide outdoor patio space for each unit, which is considered "outdoor living area" considering Florida's climate. Inclusive of the proposed patio area all the proposed multifamily units would meet the minimum of 750 square feet floor area requirement. The provision of an outdoor space for each unit allows for a better quality of life and private enjoyment of the Florida weather within a multifamily development. The proposed change to Transportation Commitment 4 would allow for the original temporary intended nature of the 330 PM peak trip limitation for the North Area, Pod C connection to CR 951 to go away once a commitment to construct to the north area of the Hacienda Lakes MPUD have been constructed. The request provides for greater clarification of the first sentence of the commitment which provides some idea of the original intent of this commitment and reads "With no improvement other than a bridge to be constructed by the Owner...". As identified by Mr. Nick Casalanguida in the provided email correspondence, the commitment was negotiated as part of the original rezoning as a temporary restriction to assure the development of this area was not solely dependent on the entry bridge. The existing commitment limitation allowed for phasing of the north area to development until the time that further transportation improvements in this area were constructed. The proposed revised commitment language identifies the restriction is to go away once the commitment of construction of Benfield (now known as Hacienda Blvd) for connectivity in the north area is provided. The PUD Developer commitment 7 already limits Residential Pod E from development until improvements to Benfield Road are completed. JUSTIFICATION/COMPLIANCE WITH LDC §10.02.13.E.1: The request complies with the thresholds for insubstantial changes to PUDs as outlined in LDC§ 10.02.13.E.1 as follows: a. A proposed change in the boundary of the PUD; No, the request will not impact the existing PUD boundary. b. A proposed increase in the total number of dwelling units or intensity of land use or height of buildings within the development; No, the request will not increase the approved density or intensity, or the height of proposed buildings. c. A proposed decrease in preservation, conservation, recreation, or open space areas within the development not to exceed 5 percent of the total acreage previously designated as such, or 5 acres in area; No, the request will not result in a decrease of preserve, conservation, recreation, or open space areas. d. A proposed increase in the size of areas used for nonresidential uses, to include institutional, commercial, and industrial land uses (excluding preservation, conservation, or open spaces), or a proposed relocation of nonresidential land uses; No, the request does not impact the size of non-residential areas or propose to relocate such use areas within the PUD boundary. e. A substantial increase in the impacts of the development which may include, but are not limited to, increases in traffic generation; changes in traffic circulation; or impacts on other public facilities; RVi Planning + Landscape Architecture I Page 2 of 4 Hacienda Lakes MPUD PDI Packet Pg. 360 3.D.d No, the request will not result in a substantial increase in the impact of the development. The trip cap of 3,328 PM peak hour for the development is not being requested to be increased or be removed. The Applicant is requesting a revision to Transportation Commitment 4 to clarify the intent for the limitation of 330 PM peak hour trips for Pod C was meant to be temporary in order to assure transportation improvements beyond the entry bridge were completed before further development of the north area. A change that will result in land use activities that generate a higher level of vehicular traffic based upon the Trip Generation Manual published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers; No, the request will not generate a higher level of vehicular traffic. No change in land use activities or intensities is being requested. g. A change that will result in a requirement for increased stormwater retention, or will otherwise increase stormwater discharges; No, the request will not result in increased requirements for stormwater retention or increase stormwater discharges. A change that will bring about a relationship to an abutting land use that would be incompatible with an adjacent land use; No, the request will not modify any existing uses or intensities, setbacks or buffers that would impact any surrounding land uses or that would be incompatible. Any modification to the PUD master plan or PUD document or amendment to a PUD ordinance which is inconsistent with the Future Land Use Element or other element of the Growth Management Plan or which modification would increase the density or intensity of the permitted land uses; No, the request does not impact the project's compliance with the Growth Management Plan (GMP). The proposed change is to a PUD district designated as a development of regional impact (DRI) and approved pursuant to F.S. § 380.06, where such change requires a determination and public hearing by Collier County pursuant to F.S. § 380.06(19). Any change that meets the criterion of F.S. § 380.06(19)(e)2, and any changes to a DRI/PUD master plan that clearly do not create a substantial deviation shall be reviewed and approved by Collier County under this LDC section 10.02.13; or No changes to the DRI/PUD master plan are proposed. The requested change does not constitute nor create a substantial deviation and does not propose any increase to the PUD trip cap of 3,328 PM peak hour trips. The request provides clarification of a PM peak hour trip limitation within the north area which was not intended to apply once other improvements beyond just the entry bridge in the north area of the development had been completed. k. Any modification in the PUD master plan or PUD document or amendment to a PUD ordinance which impact(s) any consideration deemed to be a substantial modification as described under this LDC section 10.02.13. RVi Planning + Landscape Architecture I Page 3 of 4 Hacienda Lakes MPUD PDI Packet Pg. 361 3.D.d No, the request is not a substantial modification to the MPUD and may be processed as a PDI pursuant to the LDC and Administrative Code. The request complies with the thresholds for insubstantial changes to PUDs as outlined in LDC§ 10.02.13.E.2 as follows: 1. Does this petition change the analysis of findings and criteria used for the original application? As outlined in pages 21 through 24 of the original Staff Report for the PUD Rezoning of the subject MPUD the proposed petition has not modified the original analysis of findings and criteria. No change to the permitted land uses, intensities or compatibility with surrounding land uses are being requested as part of the petition. The proposed change to the transportation commitment 4 is only to clarify a negotiated temporary limitation for the north area, Pod C of the development. CONCLUSION: In summary, the proposed Insubstantial Change to modify the Residential Development Standards table for multifamily to a minimum floor area of 650 square feet allows for greater flexibility and variety in the type of units offered to different demographics and end users within the County. The proposed revision to Transportation Commitment 4 provides for clarification of a temporary limitation that was negotiated between the Applicant and County staff at the time. No increase to the overall PM peak hour trip limitation for the MPUD development is being proposed. This application will not negatively impact public health, safety, or welfare, and the MPUD will remain consistent with the LDC and GMP. Should you require additional information or have any questions, please feel free to contact me directly at 239-908-3421 or JMedinaCcDRViPlanning.com. Sincerely, RVi Planning + Landscape Architecture Jo ephine Medina, AICP, LEED Green Assoc. Project Manager Enclosures cc: Alex Licata, Hacienda Lakes Apartments, LLC David E. Torres, Hacienda Lakes Apartments, LLC Norm Trebilcock, Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA RVi Planning + Landscape Architecture I Page 4 of 4 Hacienda Lakes MPUD PDI Packet Pg. 362 3.D.d PDI APPLICATION HACIENDA LAKES MPUD PDI-PL20230016103 M O t0 r O O M N O N J d Lo r O M N N C N E 7 u O Q 3 Y v m r C cC 2 Q Q M C N E t u R r r Q C N L t) Q Packet Pg. 363 Co ter County Growth Management Community Development Department Need Help? GMCD Public Portal Online Payment Guide E-Permitting Guides Insubstantial Change to a PUD (PDI) LDC subsection 10 Chapter 3 of the Administrative Code Pursuant to LDC subsection 10, a PUD insubstantial change includes any change that is not considered a substantial or a minor change. A PUD insubstantial change to an approved PUD ordinance shall be based upon an evaluation of LDC subsection 10 and shall require the review and approval of the Hearing Examiner. The Hearing Examiner's approval shall be based on the findings and criteria used for the original application. APPLICANT CONTACT'NFORMATION Name of Property Owner(s): Hacienda North Apartments, LLC Name of Applicant if different than owner: Address:7742 Alico Road Telephone: 239-732-5170 E-Mail Address: alicata@fl-star.com Cell: City: Fort Myers Name of Agent: Josephine Medina, AICP Firm: RVi Planning + Landscape Architecture State: FL ZIP:33912 Fax: Address: 28100 Bonita Grande Dr City: Bonita Springs State: FL Zip: 34135 Telephone: 239-908-3421 Cell: Josephine Medina, RVi Fax: E-Mail Address:Jmedina@rviplanning.com DETAIL OF REQUEST On a separate sheet, attached to the application, describe the insubstantial change request. Identify how the request does not meet the PUD substantial change criteria established in LDC subsection 10.02.13 E.1. Revised 2023 Division • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 • 239-252-2400 www.colliercountyfl.gov/ Page 1 of 4 Packet Pg. 364 Need Help? I 3.D.d I Co ierr County Growth Management Community Development Department PUD NAME: Hacienda Lakes FOLIO NUMBER(S): 48590010041 GMCD Public Portal Online Payment Guide E-Permittina Guides ORDINANCE NUMBER: 2022-18 Provide a legal (if PUD is recorded) or graphic description of area of amendment (this may be graphically illustrated on Amended PUD Master Plan). If applying for a portion of the PUD, provide a legal description for subject portion. Attach on a separate sheet, a written description of the map or text change. Does amendment comply with the Growth Management Plan? ❑■ Yes ❑ No If no, please explain: Has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? ❑ Yes ❑■ No If yes, in whose name? Has any portion of the PUD beenFM—] SOLD and/or ❑■ DEVELOPED? Are any changes proposed for the area sold and/or developed? ❑ Yes ❑■ No If yes, please describe on an attached separate sheet. Revised 2023 Page 2 of 4 Division • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 • 239-252-2400 Packet Pg. 365 www. toll iercountvfl.gov/ J 3.D.d I Co ler County Growth Management Community Development Department Need Help? GMCD Public Portal Online Payment Guide E-Permitting Guides The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Completed Application (download current form from County website) Pre -Application Meeting notes ❑ ✓® Project Narrative, including a detailed description of proposed changes and why amendment is necessary ❑ Detail of request Current Master Plan & 1 Reduced Copy Revised Master Plan & 1 Reduced Copy Revised Text and any exhibits PUD document with changes crossed through & underlined ✓ PUD document as revised with amended Title Page with Ordinance # ✓ ❑ Warranty Deed 7F ❑ Legal Description ❑ Boundary survey, if boundary of original PUD is amended Li If PUD is platted, include plat book pages ❑ List identifying Owner & all parties of corporation Affidavit of Authorization, signed & notarized Completed Addressing Checklist Property Ownership Disclosure Form Copy of 8 % in. x 11 in. graphic location map of site ✓ ❑ Electronic copy of all documents and plans *Please advise: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all materials to be submitted electronically in PDF format. ❑✓ ❑ *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: • Following the completion of the review process by County Review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. • Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. Revised 2023 Page 3 of 4 Division • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 • 239-252-2400 Packet Pg. 366 www. toll iercountvfl.gov/ 3.D.d Need Help? C O Ter C074nty GMCD Public Portal Online Pavment Guide Growth Management E-Permitting Guides Community Development Department PLANNERS — INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: ❑ School District (Residential Components): ❑ Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment: Executive Director ❑ Utilities Engineering: ❑ Parks and Recreation: ® Emergency Management: ❑ Naples Airport Authority: ❑ Conservancy of SWFL: TV Other: ® City of Naples: ❑ Other: FEE REQUIREMENTS ❑ PUD Amendment Insubstantial (PDI): $1,500.00 ❑ Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 ❑ Estimated Legal Advertising fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner: $1,125.00 Same fee applies if the petition is referred to the Collier County Planning Commission, where the CCPC serves as the deciding authority instead of the HEX. Fire Code Plans Review Fees are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. '5�4_ Agent/Owner ignat re Applicant/Owner Name (please print) Date Revised 2023 Page 4 of 4 Division • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 • 239-252-2400 Packet Pg. 367 www. toll iercountvfl.gov/ 3.D.d HACIENDA LAKES MPUD PDI-PL20230016103 7 M O r O r O O M N O N J d Q Packet Pg. 368 3.D.d This Instrument Prepared By: David E. Torres Hacienda North Apartments, LLC. 7742 Alico Rd Ft. Myers, FL 33912 (239) 208.4079 Parcel IDs: 48590010041 INSTR 6495789 OR 6320 PG 2572 RECORDED 1/10/2024 2:47 PM PAGES 2 CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT AND COMPTROLLEF COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA DOC@.70 $0.70 REG $18.50 CONS $10.00 Consideration: $ 10.00 (Note: The transfer is between related entities for nominal consideration only.) WARRANTY DEED t �A This Warranty Deed is made this 2i day of October, 2023, between HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC, a Florida limited liability company ("Grantor"), and HACIENDA NORTH APARTMENTS, LLC, a Florida limited liability company ("Grantee"), whose address is 7742 Alico Rd, Ft. Myers, FL 33912, The Grantor, in consideration of the sum of TEN AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($10.00) and other good and valuable considerations to said Grantor in hand paid by the Grantee, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to the said Grantee and Grantee's successors and assigns forever, the following described property, situated, lying and being in Collier County, Florida, to wit: Tract "FD1", Hacienda North — Phase 1, According to the Plat Thereof, Recorded in Plat Book 73 Pages 21 through 30, of the Public Records of Collier County, FL Subject to: (a) ad valorem and non ad valorem real property taxes for 2024 and subsequent years; (b) zoning, building code and other use restrictions imposed by governmental authority; (c) outstanding oil, gas and mineral interests of record, if any; and (d) covenants, conditions, reservations, easements and restrictions of record. Together with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. To Have and to Hold, the same in fee simple forever. And the Grantor hereby covenants with said Grantee that the Grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the Grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey Warranty Deed Page No. I of 2 Packet Pg. 369 3.D.d said land; and that the Grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has executed and delivered this Warranty Deed the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence: Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company 1� By: Witness 1 — Signature David E. orres, its 77y2-.u 'e rL 3Sg12- K. ��(� nK . W-4fuV Witness 1-,- Printed Name — Signature �-� �A fhhj-A� Witness 2 - Print�e(,,, kcl `7 7 �Y'ers F-C.. 337f 2- STATE OF j` COUNTY OF Lop - The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this RA day of October, 2023, by David E. Torres, as Manager of Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, who is personally known to me or who has produced as identification. (SEAL) NNotary Public State of FloridaCharlotte M. walkupMy Commission GG 945455 Expires01/2112024 0j4d.Q2Z U. Notary Public - Signature Print Name: 6&lek Wanantybeed Page Packet Pg. 370 3.D.d HACIENDA LAKES MPUD PDI-PL20230016103 M O r t0 r O ADDRESS CHECKLIST O M N O N J d LO r O M N N C N E 7 u O Q 3 Y v m r C cC 2 Q Q M C N E t u R r r Q C N L t) Q Packet Pg. 371 3.D.d COlfler county Growth Management Community Development Department ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following and upload via the CityView Portal with your submittal. Items marked with (*) are required for every application, other items are optional and may not apply to every project. Forms are valid for 6 months following their submittal; an updated form will be required for a new submittal after that timeframe and any time the properties within the project boundary are modified. Additional documents may be attached to this form and can include: - * LOCATION MAP and/or SURVEY showing the proposed project boundary. - List of additional folio numbers and associated legal descriptions. - E-mail from Addressing Official for any pre -approved project and/or street names. LOCATION INFORMATION *FOLIO (Property ID) Number(s) of subject property or properties. [Attach list if necessary] 48590010041 *LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties. [Attach list if necessary] See attached STREET ADDRESS(ES) where applicable, if already assigned. N/A PROJECT INFORMATION Acceptance of this form does not constitute project and/or street name approval and is subject to further review by the Addressing Official. Pre -Approval may be requested by contacting us at GMD_Add ressing@colliercountyfLgov or 239-252-2482 prior to your submittal. CURRENT PROJECT NAME Hacienda Lakes MPUD PROPOSED PROJECT NAME SAME PROPOSED STREET NAME(s) LATEST APPROVED PROJECT NUMBER [e.g., SDP-94-##, PPL-2002-AR-####, PL2017000####] PL20210001791,PL20210002454 Addressing Checklist (Rev 10/2022) Page 1 of 1 Operations & Regulatory Management Division • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 • 239-252-2400 www.coll iercountyfl.gov Packet Pg. 372 10/17/23, 5:25 PM Print Map IDA 2004. Collier County Property Appraiser. While the Collier County Property Appraiser is committed to providing the most accurate and up-to-date information, no warranties expressed or implied are provided for the data herein, its use, or its interpretation. https://maps.collierappraiser.com/mapprint.aspx?pagetitle=&orient=LANDSCAPE&paper=LETTER&minX=429616.172096894&minY=6 Packet Pg. 373 10/17/23, 5:26 PM Details Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Site Address Site Zone Parcel No 48590010041 *Disclaimer Site City NAPLES *Note 34114 Name / Address HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES LLC 7742 ALICO RD City I FORT MYERS State I FL Map No. Strap No. Section Township Range 5B14 393460 TR FD151314 14 50 26 Legal HACIENDA NORTH PH 1 TRACT FD-1 Millage Area 9 39 Sub./Condo 393460 - HACIENDA NORTH PH 1 Use Code 9 99 - ACREAGE NOT ZONED AGRICULTURAL Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date I Book -Page I Amount Zip 133912 Acres *Estimated 20.21 Millage Rates 9 *Calculations School Other Total 4.292 6.0197 10.3117 2023 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value $ 3,536,750 (+) Improved Value $ 0 (_) Market Value $ 3,536,750 (_) Assessed Value $ 3,536,750 (_) School Taxable Value $ 3,536,750 (_) Taxable Value $ 3,536,750 If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll https://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/recorddetail.html?sid=&Map=No&FolioNum=48590010041 I Packet Pg. 374 3.D.d HACIENDA LAKES MPUD PDI-PL20230016103 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM Packet Pg. 375 3.D.d CAA County Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1036 1 Email: GMDClientServices@colliercountyfl.gov www.colliercountyfl.gov PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: Name and Address % of Ownership b. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the iercentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address % of Ownership C. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the iercentage or interest: Name and Address % of Ownership 01/2023 Page 1 of 3 Packet Pg. 376 3.D.d .•� i Co er County Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1036 1 Email: GMDClientservices@colliercountyfl.gov www.colliercountyfl.gov If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners: Name and Address % of Ownership 7742 Alico dFt M ers, FL 33912 —140%� 33.33 e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the f 9. �I I ILCI Z), ::.LUk. IUIUCI :), UCI Itf I L I d I rC�, UI P d I LI ICI ). Name and Address % of Ownership Date of Contract: If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust: Date subject property acquired ❑ Leased: Term of lease years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: 01/2023 Page 2 of 3 Packet Pg. 377 3.D.d 0. Co er County Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone; (239) 252-1036 1 Email: GMDCIientServices@colliercountyfl.gov www.colliercountyfl.gov Date of option: Date option terminates: , or Anticipated closing date: AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form. Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest -holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition's final public hearing. As the authorized agent/applicont for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. 1 understand that failure to include oil necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. *The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Community Development Department i GMD Portal: https://cvportal.colliercountyfl.gov/cityviewweb Questions? Email: GMDclientservices@colliercountyfl.gov P44, Agent/Owner Signature David E. Torres Agent/Owner Name (please print) Z o 4( ro-�-z3 Date �a_�LLZ: 01/2023 Page 3 of 3 Packet Pg. 378 3.D.d HACIENDA LAKES MPUD PDI-PL20230016103 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION Packet Pg. 379 3.D.d AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PL20230016103 David E. Torres (print name), as Manager (title, if applicable) of Hacienda North Apartments, LLC (company, If applicable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner0 applicantQcontract purchaser=and that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. Well authorize RyiPlanning + Landscape Architecture to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. *Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres, or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner" of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee". • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties ofoerju� de�e that the facts stated i It are STATE OF FLORJDA COUNTY OF COLLIER the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that 3 rg/2-4. Date The foregoing instrument was acknowleged before me by means of physical presence or 0 online notarization this day of O�l(,V'Gh 201 , by (printed name of owner or qualifier) AW C ZOfi'ef Such person(s) Notary Public must check applicable box: re personally known to me 171 Has produced a current drivers license Has produced A as identification. Notary Signature: NVJ� AL W#�W CP\08-COA-00115\155 REV 3/4/2020 Notary Public State of Florida t Charlotte M. Walkup My. Commission HH 460908 Expires 1 /21 /2028 Packet Pg. 380 3.D.d HACIENDA LAKES MPUD PDI-PL20230016103 AMENDED PUD ORDINANCE Packet Pg. 381 3.D.d EXHIBIT A PERMITTED USES PROJECT LAND USE TRACTS TRACT TYPE UNITS. ACREAGE± TRACT "R" RESIDENTIAL 1,714 447.86 TRACT "R/MU" RESIDENTIAL/MEDICAL USE 25 min.* 38.82 TRACT "BP" BUSINESS PARK 1 35.38 TRACT "C" COMMERCIAL 17 min.* 34.16 TRACT "A" ATTRACTION 1 47.27 TRACT "P" PRESERVE 0 1,544.14 TRACT "PF" PUBLIC FACILITY 0 1.33 TRACT "JD" JUNIOR DEPUTY 2 21.62 TRACT "ROW" PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY 0 72.01 TRACT "S" SCHOOL 0 19.55 Total 1,760 2262.14 *: Denotes the minimum number of dwelling units that must be constructed in the associated land use tract. Given that Tract C may generate up to 55 residential dwelling units, thirty (30%) percent of those residential units (17 units) must be constructed in Tract C. Tract R/MU is required by this document to have no less than 25 residential dwelling units constructed within that Tract. The balance of the residential dwelling units generated from Tract C (13 units) must be constructed in either the R/MU Tract, or on a portion of Tract R, within one-third of one mile of the boundary of Tract C. GENERAL PERMITTED LAND USES Streets, alleys, water management facilities and structures, utilities and other infrastructure improvements are generally permitted anywhere within this MPUD except for in the P, Preserve Tract. II TRACT "R", RESIDENTIAL PERMITTED USES: Up to 1,760 residential units consisting of single family units and multi -family units are permitted in the entire PUD. No more than 1,232 units in the entire PUD shall be multi -family, as defined in the LDC. Residential units may be converted to senior housing units, where permitted, in accordance with the Land Use Conversion Factors in Exhibit B. Upon conversion, the residential units shall be reduced according to the Land Use Conversion Factors in Exhibit B. Developer and County shall each maintain a master list of converted uses for this PUD. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: Single family detached dwellings; 2. Zero lot line, detached dwellings; Two-family and duplex dwellings; Hacienda Lakes MPUD PL20210001791 Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page Packet Pg. 382 3.D.d 4. Single family attached dwellings, (including townhouses intended for fee simple conveyance including the platted lot associated with the residence); 5. Multi -family dwellings; 6. Senior housing for persons over age 55, limited to independent living facilities, assisted living facilities, skilled nursing facilities, and continuing care retirement communities. Senior housing facilities shall not be considered residential land uses for the purposes of density, but shall be derived from conversion from residential units in accordance with the Land Use Conversion Factors in Exhibit B. These land uses shall be developed in accordance the development standards set forth in Table II of Exhibit B. In no instance shall greater than 450 senior housing units be developed in the entire MPUD; 7. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the BZA, by the process outlined in the LDC. B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with principal uses permitted in this land use tract, including swimming pools, spas, docks, boat houses, and screen enclosures, recreational facilities designed to serve the development; 2. Model homes and model home centers including offices for project administration, construction, sales and marketing, apartment rental, as well as resale and rental of units within the MPUD in perpetuity (group 6531); Recreational facilities and structures to serve the PUD, including clubhouses, health and fitness facilities, pools, meeting rooms, community buildings, boardwalks, playgrounds, playfields, tennis courts, and similar uses intended to exclusively serve the residents of the PUD and their guests; 4. Horse stables and related equestrian facilities to serve the PUD that complement the MPUD's proximity to the Picayune Strand State Forest may be allowed on residential lands lying east of the proposed north/south public roadway, subject to applicable permitting. This private, non-commercial, accessory use is intended for stabling for residents of the PUD. Horse racing, dressage, or horse jumping events open to the public are prohibited; 5. Private stables on single-family lots greater than 43,560 square feet in lot area, on residential lands lying east of the proposed north/south public roadway are permitted to allow one horse for each 21,780 square feet of lot area; 6. Horse trails. Hacienda Lakes MPUD PL20210001791 Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page Packet Pg. 383 3.D.d III TRACT "R/MU", RESIDENTIAL/MEDICAL USE PERMITTED USES: Up to I,760 residential units consisting of single family units and multi -family units are permitted in the entire PUD. No more than 1,232 units in the entire PUD shall be multi -family as defined in the LDC. The residential units may be converted to senior housing units, where permitted, in accordance with the Land Use Conversion Factors in Exhibit B. Upon conversion, the residential units shall be reduced according to the Land Use Conversion Factors in Exhibit B. Up to 50,000 square feet of gross floor area of medical office related land uses are also allowed in this tract, less up to 50,000 square feet of gross floor area of medical related office land uses approved by plat or SDP in Tract C. Developer and County shall each maintain a master list of converted uses for this PUD. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or uses, or and used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: Single family detached dwellings; 2. Zero lot line, detached dwellings; Two-family and duplex dwellings; 4. Single family attached dwellings, (including townhouses intended for fee simple conveyance including the platted lot associated with the residence); 5. Multi -family dwellings; 6. Senior housing for persons over age 55, limited to independent living facilities, assisted living facilities, skilled nursing facilities, and continuing care retirement communities. Senior housing facilities shall not be considered residential land uses for the purposes of density, but shall be derived from conversion from residential units in accordance with the Land Use Conversion Factors in Exhibit B. These land uses shall be developed in accordance the development standards set forth in Table II of Exhibit B In no instance shall greater than 450 senior housing units be developed in the entire MPUD. 7. Drug Stores and Proprietary Stores (Group 5912). If this retail use is developed in the R/MU Tract then the square footage of gross floor area of this retail use shall reduce the square footage of gross floor area of retail uses permitted in Tract C.; 8. Health Services, (Groups 8011-8049, 8071-8072, 8082, and 8092-8099); 9. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals ("BZA") by the process outlined in the LDC. B. Accessory Uses: Hacienda Lakes MPUD PL20210001791 Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page Packet Pg. 384 3.D.d I. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with principal uses permitted in this land use tract, including swimming pools, spas, docks, boat houses, and screen enclosures, recreational facilities designed to serve the development; 2. Model homes and model home centers including offices for project administration, construction, sales and marketing; Recreational facilities and structures to serve the PUD including clubhouses, health and fitness facilities, pools, meeting rooms, community buildings, boardwalks, playgrounds, playfields, tennis courts, and similar uses intended to exclusively serve the residents of the PUD and their guests. IV TRACT `BP" BUSINESS PARK PERMITTED USES: Up to 140,000 square feet of gross floor area of business park land uses, and a hotel of up to 135 rooms capped at 92,000 square feet of gross floor area if a hotel is not developed in Tract C. However, if owner elects not to build a hotel on Tract C or BP, then the square footage limitation of business park land uses could be exceeded if a hotel conversion to business park of up to 60,000 square feet of gross floor area is used based on the land use conversions in Exhibit B. In place of the business park and hotel land uses, a school may be developed. If a hotel is constructed on Tract C or BP, based on an approved plat or SDP, then the hotel conversion shall terminate. Tract `BP" is located directly north of the Attraction Tract that accommodates the Swamp Buggy land uses and facilities. This acreage is meant to provide for a transition from the Attraction land uses to the Residential Tract and intended land uses further north. This Tract shall be permitted to be developed for either a business park or a school. If the Tract is developed as a school, only those uses permitted in Section XI shall be allowed. Should the 35.38 acre tract be proposed for development as a business park, no building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: Apparel and other finished products (groups 2311-2399); 2. Building construction (groups 1521-1542); Business services (group 7311); 4. Communications (groups 4812-4899, including communication towers limited in height to 100 feet); 5. Construction: Special trade contractors (groups 1711-1799); 6. Depository and non -depository institutions (groups 6081, 6082); 7. Drugs and medicines (groups 2833-2836); 8. Eating places (group 5812, not including fast foods, walk-up windows and drive- thru restaurants); 9. Educational services (groups 8221-8299); Hacienda Lakes MPUD PL20210001791 Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page Packet Pg. 385 3.D.d 10. Electronics and other electrical equipment manufacturing, indoor only (groups 3612- 3699); 11. Engineering, accounting, research, management, and related services (groups 8711- 8748); 12. Food manufacturing (groups 2034, 2038, 2053, 2064, 2066, 2068, 2096, 2098, 2099); 13. Furniture and fixtures manufacturing (groups 2511-2599); 14. Government offices/buildings (groups 9111-9222, 9224-9229, 9311, 9411-9451, 9511-9532, 9611-9661 ); 15. Health services (groups 8011-8049); 16. Industrial and commercial machinery and computer equipment (groups 3524, 3546, 3571 - 3579); 17. Industrial inorganic chemicals (groups 2833, and 2844); 18. Job training and vocational rehabilitation services (group 8331); 19. Leather and leather products (groups 3131-3199); 20. Measuring, analyzing, and controlling instruments; photographic, medical and optical goods; watches and clocks manufacturing (groups 3812-3873); 21. Medical laboratories and research and rehabilitative centers (groups 8071, 8072, 8092, 8093); 22. Miscellaneous manufacturing industries (groups 3911-3999); 23. Motion picture production (groups 7812-7819); 24. Motor freight transportation and warehousing (group 4225, mini- and self- storage warehousing only), subject to the following criteria: i. The use of metal roll -up garage doors located on the exterior of the perimeter buildings and walls of buildings which are visible from a public right-of-way is prohibited; and ii. Access to individual units whether direct or non -direct must be from the side of the building that is oriented internally; iii. No building shall exceed 100 feet in length when adjacent to a residential tract within the MPUD; iv. No outdoor storage of any kind is permitted, and v. Storage units shall be utilized for storage purposes only. 25. Printing, publishing and allied industries (groups 2711-2796); Hacienda Lakes MPUD PL20210001791 Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page Packet Pg. 386 3.D.d 26. Rubber and miscellaneous plastic products (groups 3021, 3052, 3053); 27. Security/commodity brokers (group 6211); 28. Transportation equipment (groups 3714, 3716, 3732, 3751, 3792, 3799); 29. U.S. Postal Service (group 4311); 30. Wholesale trade durable goods (groups 5021, 5031, 5043-5049, 5063-5078, 5091, 5092, 5094-5099); 31. Wholesale trade non durable goods (5111-5153, 5181, 5182, 5191, except that wholesale distribution of chemicals, fertilizers, insecticides, and pesticides shall be a minimum of 500 feet from a residential tract within the MPUD, 5192-5193); 32. Any other use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals. B. Limited Principal Uses: The following uses shall be limited to a maximum of 30 percent of the total acreage of the Business Park tract: 1. Business services (7312, 7313, 7319, 7331, 7334-7336, 7342, 7349, 7352, 7361, no labor pools, 7371-7384, 7389); 2. Child day care services (group 8351); Depository and non -depository institutions (groups 6021-6062, 6091, 6099, 6111- 6163); 4. Drug stores (group 5912, limited to drug stores and pharmacies) in conjunction with health service groups and medical laboratories/research/rehabilitative groups; 5. Hotels (group 7011) up to 135 rooms, capped at 92,000 square feet of gross floor area if a hotel is not developed in Tract C. Hotel square footage does not reduce the business park square footage cap. If the hotel conversion is applied to Tract BP, then a hotel is not permitted; 6. Membership organizations (group 8611); business associations (group 8621); professional organizations (8631); labor unions and similar labor organizations; 7. Personal services (groups 7215-7231, 7241); 8. Physical fitness facilities and bowling centers (groups 7991, 7933); 9. Professional offices; insurance agencies (group 6411); insurance carriers (groups 6311-6399); real estate (6531, 6541, 6552, 6553); holding and other investment offices (groups 6712-6799); attorneys (group 8111 ); 10. Travel agencies (group 4724). Hacienda Lakes MPUD PL20210001791 Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page Packet Pg. 387 3.D.d C. Uses Accessory to Principal and Limited Uses: Uses and structures that are accessory and incidental to uses permitted as of right; 2. One (1) caretaker's residence within Tract BP, Business Park Tract, subject to the following: i. The residence shall be constructed as an integral part of the principal structure and shall be entered from within the principal structure. Exits required to comply with fire code shall be permitted; ii. The caretaker's residence shall be an accessory use and shall be for the exclusive use of the property owner, tenant, or designated employee operating or maintaining the principal structure; iii. Off-street parking shall be as required for a single-family residence. For primary business park uses, retail sales and/or display areas as accessory to the principal uses shall not exceed an area greater than 20 percent of the gross floor area of the permitted principal use and is further subject to retail standards for landscaping, parking and open space. V TRACT "C", COMMERCIAL PERMITTED USES: Up to 327,500 square feet of gross floor area of retail land uses and up to 70,000 square feet of gross floor area of professional and medical office uses reduced by medical -related retail use square footages approved by SDP in Tract R/MU and reduced by up to 50,000 square feet of gross floor area of professional and medical office land use square footages approved by plat or SDP in Tract R/MU. The 70,000 square feet of professional and medical office may be exceeded if the retail land uses are converted to office thereby reducing the retail square footage, not to exceed 25% of the retail land use allocation. Additionally, a hotel of up to 135 rooms and up to 92,000 square feet of gross floor area shall be allowed in Tract C unless a hotel is developed within Tract BP or if the hotel use is converted to BP uses in Tract BP based on an approved plat or SDP. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: Single family attached dwellings, (including townhouses intended for fee simple conveyance including the platted lot associated with the residence); 2. Multi -family dwellings; Residential land uses integrated into commercial buildings with residential units located above commercial land uses to create a mixed -use building; 4. Accounting, auditing and bookkeeping services (group 8721); 5. Adjustment and collection services (group 7322); 6. Advertising agencies (group 7311); 7. Advertising- miscellaneous (group 7319); Hacienda Lakes MPUD PL20210001791 Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page Packet Pg. 388 3.D.d 8. Amusements and recreation services, indoor (groups 7911-7922, 7991, 7993, 7999, only billiard parlors, bingo parlors, martial arts and yoga instruction, bicycle and golf cart rentals); 9. Apparel and accessory stores with (groups 5611-5699); 10. Auto and home supply stores (groups 5211-5261, and 5531); 11. Automotive dealers, not elsewhere classified (group 5599); 12. Automobile parking (group 7521), including garages -automobile parking, parking structures, no towing yards; 13. Automotive repair, services and parking (groups 7513 - 7533, 7536-7549); 14. Barber shops (group 7241), except barber schools; 15. Beauty shops (7231), except beauty schools; 16. Boat dealers (5551); 17. Bookkeeping services (8721); 18. Bowling centers, indoor (7933); 19. Building construction - General contractors (groups 1521 - 1542); 20. Building materials, hardware and garden supplies (groups 5211-5261); 21. Business associations (group 8611); 22. Business consulting services (group 8748); 23. Business credit institutions (groups 6153-6159); 24. Business services (groups 7311-7353, 7359, except labor contractors, 7371-7379, 7381 except armored car and dog rental, 7382-7389 except auctioneering service, automobile recovery, automobile repossession, batik work, bottle exchanges, bronzing, cloth cutting, cosmetic kits, cotton inspection, cotton sampler, drive - away automobile, exhibits -building, filling pressure containers, field warehousing, fire extinguisher, floats -decoration, folding and refolding, gas systems, bottle labeling, liquidation services, metal slitting and shearing, packaging and labeling, patrol of electric transmission or gas lines, press clipping service, repossession service, rug binding, salvaging of damaged merchandise, scrap steel cutting and slitting, shrinking textiles, solvent recovery, sponging textiles, tape slitting, texture designers, textile folding, tobacco sheeting and window trimming service); 25. Cable and other pay television services (group 4841); 26. Senior housing for persons over age 55, limited to independent and assisted living facilities, continuing care retirement communities, and nursing homes. This Hacienda Lakes MPUD PL20210001791 Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page Packet Pg. 389 3.D.d housing is included in the retail square foot limitation and no greater than 450 senior housing units shall be developed in this entire MPUD; 27. Child day care services (8351); 28. Commercial printing (2752, excluding newspapers); 29. Civic, social and fraternal associations (group 8641); 30. Coin operated amusement devices, indoor (group 7993); 31. Communications (groups 4812-4841) including communications towers up to specified height, subject to LDC Section 5.05.09; 32. Construction - special trade contractors (groups 1711 - 1793, 1796, 1799); 33. Dance studios, schools and halls (group 7911); 34. Drug stores (group 5912); 35. Depository institutions (groups 6011-6099); 36. Eating and drinking establishments (group 5812, and group 5813) excluding bottle clubs. Outdoor amplified sound is prohibited; 37. Educational services (groups 8221, 8222, 8243 - 8249); 38. Engineering, accounting, research, management and related services (groups 8711- 8748); 39. Food stores (groups 5411-5499); 40. Gasoline service stations (group 5541 subject to LDC requirements); 41. General merchandise stores (groups 5311, 5331-5399); 42. Glass and glazing work (1793); 43. Health services (groups 8011-8049, 8051-8059, 8071-8072, 8082 and 8092-8099); 44. Home furniture, furnishing, and equipment (groups 5712-5736); 45. Hotels and motels (groups 7011, 7021, and 7041) only if a hotel is not built in Tract BP and the hotel conversion is not applied to Tract BP; 46. Insurance carriers, agents and brokers (groups 6311-6399, 6411); 47. Landscape architects, consulting and planning (group 0781); 48. Legal services (group 8111); Hacienda Lakes MPUD PL20210001791 Last Revised: January 28, 2022 d Y J cC c a� c� x 0 a M 0 co 0 0 M N 0 N J a LO 0 CD PC Page Packet Pg. 390 3.D.d 49. Libraries (group 8231); 50. Management and public relations services (groups 8741-8743, 8748); 51. Membership organizations (8611-8699); 52. Membership sports and recreation clubs, indoor (group 7997); 53. Miscellaneous personal services (7291, 7299, debt counseling only); 54. Miscellaneous repair services (groups 7622 - 7699); 55. Miscellaneous retail (groups 5912-5963, 5992-5999); 56. Motion picture theaters (group 7832); 57. Motorcycle dealers (group 5571); 58. Motor freight transportation and warehousing (group 4225 mini- and self -storage warehousing only); 59. Museums and art galleries (group 8412); 60. Non -depository credit institutions, and loan brokers (groups 6111-6163 ); 61. Offices for engineering, architectural, and surveying services (groups 0781, 8711- 8713); 62. Paint, glass and wallpaper stores (5231); 63. Passenger car leasing (group 7515); 64. Passenger car rental (group 7514); 65. Personal services (groups 7211, 7212, 7215, 7216 nonindustrial dry cleaning only, 7217, 7219, 7221-7251, no beauty or barber schools, 7261 except crematories, 7291, 7299, excluding massage parlors, escort services, steam baths, Turkish baths and tattoo parlors); 66. Photographic studios (7221); 67. Physical fitness facilities (7991); 68. Political organizations (group 8651); 69. Printing, publishing, and allied industries (groups 2711, 2721); 70. Professional membership organizations (group 8621); 71. Public Administration (groups 9111-9199, 9229, 9311, 9411-9451, 9511-9532, 9611-9661); Hacienda Lakes MPUD PL20210001791 Last Revised: January 28, 2022 d Y J c� c a� c� x 0 a M 0 co 0 Co M N 0 N J a LO 0 CD PC Page 1 Packet Pg. 391 3.D.d 72. Public or private parks and playgrounds; 73. Public relations services (group 8743); 74. Radio, television, and consumer electronics stores (group 5731); 75. Radio and television broadcasting stations (groups 4832, and 4833); 76. Real estate (group 6512, 6531-6552); 77. Record and prerecorded tape stores (group 5735), excluding adult oriented rentals and sales; 78. Recreational vehicle dealers (group 5561); 79. Religious organizations (group 8661); 80. Research, development, and testing services (group 8731-8734); 81. Retail nurseries, lawn and garden supply stores (group 5261); 82. Security and commodity brokers, dealer, exchanges and services (groups 6211- 6289); 83. Theatrical producers and miscellaneous theatrical services, indoor (groups 7922- 7929); 84. Tour operators (group 4725); 85. Travel agencies (group 4724); 86. United States Postal Service (4311 except major distribution center); 87. Veterinary services (groups 0742, 0752 excluding outside kenneling); 88. Videotape rental (7841), excluding adult oriented rental and sales; 89. Vocational schools (groups 8243-8299); 90. Any other commercial use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted uses and consistent with the purpose and intent statement of the district as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals. A. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: 1. Parking facilities and signage; Hacienda Lakes MPUD PL20210001791 Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 1 Packet Pg. 392 3.D.d 2. Eating/ Picnic Area; 3. One (1) caretaker's residence within the C, Commercial Tract; 4. Child care, outdoor play areas. Where play areas are constructed as an accessory use to a permitted use, the following conditions shall apply: a. A minimum five-foot, six-inch high reinforced fence shall be installed on all sides of the play area which are not open to the principal structure; b. Ingress to and egress from the play area shall be made only from the principal structure, however an emergency exit from the play area shall be provided which does not empty into the principal structure; C. The play equipment shall be set back a minimum distance of five feet from the required fence and from the principal structure. 5. Kiosks, that are small separate structures, often movable and open on one or more sides, used as a newsstand, vending stall, or other conveniences, Individual kiosks shall not to exceed 200 square feet.; VI TRACT "A" ATTRACTION PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: 1. "Swamp Buggy" race track (group 7948, swamp buggy track only); 2. County fair and similar expositions, including circuses, carnivals, and other recreation/entertainment activities; 3. Exhibition hall/community center; 4. Amateur soccer, softball, lacrosse, volleyball, football, and similar outdoor recreational sports and activities and shall not be limited in the number of occurrences; 5. Indoor target ranges, including archery; 6. Stock car, monster trucks, and motorized vehicle race track (group 7948, motorized vehicle race track only); 7. Motocross (including bicycle and motorcycle) race course (group 7948, motocross race course only); 8. Stadium, training, and practice facilities for professional baseball (group 7941). This use is allowed only if a Notice of Proposed Change or Substantial Deviation Application for Development Approval is processed in accordance with Section Hacienda Lakes MPUD PL20210001791 Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 1 Packet Pg. 393 3.D.d 380.06, F.S., or any successor statute, and the Hacienda Lakes DRI is amended. If state law changes such that DRI review or other state review is no longer required then this provision shall terminate; 9. Administrative offices and supportive service facilities; 10. Any other use or structure that is comparable in nature to the foregoing and that is approved by the Board of Zoning Appeals. B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: Any accessory uses and structures that are incidental to and customarily associated with those uses permitted herein; 2. Onsite water management, utility, and service facilities; Signs as permitted or required by the applicable Collier County Land Development Code at the time of application for construction permits; 4. Residential facilities (one (1) residential unit within the A, Attraction Tract) for housing of security personnel or caretakers whose work requires residence on the property; 5. Concessions, ticketing, bleachers, and other spectator -related facilities; 6. Picnicking and playground areas, as well as areas for camping that may be utilized only three days prior to, during, and three days after a major event weekend. C. Conditional Uses: Fuel storage and related facilities. VII TRACT "P" PRESERVE PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses Upland preserves; 2. Wetland preserves; B Accessory Uses and Structures Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: Hacienda Lakes MPUD PL20210001791 Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 1 Packet Pg. 394 3.D.d 1. Boardwalks, nature trails, horse trails, shelters, viewing platforms, educational signs, and information kiosks; 2. Water management structures; 3. Archaeological sites and associated research of said sites. a� VII TRACT "PF" PUBLIC FACILITY PERMITTED USES: J cC No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: c� x A. Principal Uses 0 a 1. Public safety facilities intended to provide emergency medical, ground transportation services. c co B. Accessory Uses c M N Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and N structures, including, but not limited to: a LO 1. Parking facilities and signage; CD 2. Administrative offices and support service facilities; c a� 3. Lighting or storm water management facilities and structures. E n IX TRACT "JD" JUNIOR DEPUTY PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: 1. Open space and outdoor recreational uses, including, but not limited to hiking, biking, fishing, boating, camping, picnicking and nature trails; 2. Sporting and recreational camps; 3. Caretaker's residence, limited to two for the JD, Junior Deputy Tract. B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: 1. Boardwalks, nature trails, shelters, pavilions, viewing piers, viewing platforms, educational signs, kiosks, and docks or platforms for launching and mooring or storage of non -motorized vessels utilizing movable storage racks; Hacienda Lakes MPUD PL20210001791 Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 1 Packet Pg. 395 3.D.d 2. Covered camping pavilion(s) (i.e.: concrete, or similar hard surface, that is roofed, and may, or may not be enclosed with screen/plastic sheeting, or walls), which may include kitchen/cooking facilities, office and restroom facilities; 3. Passive parks and passive recreational uses; 4. Pervious roads, driveways, and pervious and/or impervious parking facilities; 5. Project identification and directional signage; 6. Water management structures; 7. Restrooms/bath houses; 8. Roofed or unroofed storage for maintenance and recreational equipment; 9. Fencing and security gates, which may include barbed wire; 10. Archery and air rifle range(s). X TRACT "S" SCHOOLS PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: 1. Schools, public or private, including Educational Services (Group 82). B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: 1. Educational facilities; 2. Parking facilities and signage; 3. Administrative offices and support service facilities; 4. Lighting or storm water management facilities and structures; 5. Recreational facilities. XI SIGNS: A. Seven on -premise, ground signs shall be permitted on property corners fronting on existing, proposed, or future public roadways as depicted and labeled "Boundary Marker" on Sheets 3 and 4 of the MPUD Master Plan Set. These ground signs shall be allowed in addition to other signage allowed by Section 5.06.00 of the LDC. Each of these permitted signs shall Hacienda Lakes MPUD PL20210001791 Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 1 Packet Pg. 396 3.D.d only contain the name of the project or any major use, insignia or motto of the entire development (See Exhibit E, Deviation #3). B. One real estate sign shall be permitted in the Commercial Tract for the purposes of marketing residential products within the MPUD. This additional real estate signage may be utilized by any of the developers of the residential communities within the MPUD (See Exhibit E, Deviation #6). C. The existing Swamp Buggy sign located in the southeast corner of Rattlesnake Hammock road and Collier Boulevard shall be allowed to remain until new signage can be permitted in Tract C. (See Exhibit E, Deviation #7) D. Two entry signs along Collier Boulevard associated with the Hacienda Lakes - North Area shall be permitted to include multiple residential communities on a single sign to accommodate developments which share access to Collier Boulevard as depicted on Exhibit E-4, Hacienda Lakes — North Area Signage Deviation Exhibit, Sheet 2 of 2 (See Exhibit E, Deviations #14, 15, and 16). Hacienda Lakes MPUD PL20210001791 Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 1 Packet Pg. 397 3.D.d EXHIBIT B DEVELOPMENTSTANDARDS GENERAL: Development of the Hacienda Lakes MPUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this Ordinance and applicable sections of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) and Growth Management Plan (GMP) in effect at the time of issuance of any development order, such as, but not limited to, final subdivision plat, final site development plan, excavation permit, and preliminary work authorization, to which such regulations relate. Where these regulations fail to provide developmental standards, then the provisions of the most similar district in the LDC shall apply. Conversion of residential land use types are provided for below which may be utilized to apportion units to senior housing or recreational vehicle units relative to the mix of residential land uses within this MPUD and their relation to public facility impacts. Table I below, sets forth the development standards for residential land uses within the MPUD, including residential land uses that are required to be developed in Tracts C and R/MU. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or Subdivision plat. Figures 1 thru 7 generally depict typical development standards for the various residential products. Table II below, sets forth the development standards for commercial land uses, senior housing units, and public facility land uses within the MPUD, however these standards do not apply to the Collier County School District public schools. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or Subdivision plat. Table III below, sets forth the development standards for the business park land uses and school land uses within the MPUD, however these standards do not apply to the Collier County School District public schools. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or Subdivision plat. Table IV below, sets forth the development standards for the Attraction land uses and Junior Deputy passive recreation land uses within the MPUD. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or Subdivision plat. The facilities and improvements that are depicted on Exhibit C, the MPUD Master Plan shall be considered conceptual in nature. The design, location, and configuration of land improvements shall be defined at either site development plan, or construction plans and plat approval(s). Except as provided for herein, all criteria set forth below shall be understood to be in relation to individual parcel or lot boundary lines, or between structures. Condominium, and/or homeowners' association boundaries shall not be utilized for determining development standards. MAXIMUM DENSITY AND INTENSITY: Residential Density: This MPUD shall be limited to 1,760 residential dwelling units (du) that equates to a density of 0.78 dwelling units per gross acre. The 1,760 residential units are either single- or multi -family units as defined in the LDC. No more than 1,232 multi -family units may be constructed in the entire PUD. Caretakers residences shall be deducted from the 1,760 unit allocation. A minimum of 25 residential units shall be constructed in the R/MU Tract, and a minimum of 17 residential units shall be constructed in Tract Hacienda Lakes MPUD PL20210001791 Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 1 Packet Pg. 398 3.D.d C. The balance of the residential dwelling units generated from Tract C (13 units) must be constructed in either the R/MU Tract, or on a portion of Tract R, within one-third of one mile of the boundary of Tract C. LAND USE CONVERSION FACTORS Residential Density: 1.0 residential unit equates to 4 Senior Housing Units (not to exceed 450 Senior Housing Units in the entire PUD). Up to 1,232 of the total 1,760 residential units may be multi -family as defined in the Land Development Code. Commercial Intensity: Hacienda Lakes is intended to be developed with a mixture of commercial land uses that include 327,500 square feet of gross floor area of retail uses, 50,000 square feet of gross floor area of medical office uses, 20,000 square feet of gross floor area of general office uses, 140,000 square feet of gross floor area of business park land uses, and 135 hotel rooms. In no event shall the project exceed 3,328 PM Peak Hour Trips. Such maximum trip generation cap was developed based on 327,500 gross square feet of retail land uses, 50,000 gross square feet of medical office land uses, 20,000 gross square feet of general office land uses, 140,000 gross square feet of business park land uses, a primary school with a contemplated enrollment of 919 students, 135 hotel rooms, not to exceed 92,000 gross square feet, 704 single-family units, and 1,056 multi -family units. However, the hotel shall not count against the 140,000 square foot cap associated with the business park. Should the BP Tract not be developed as a business park but be developed as a school facility (excluding Collier County School District public schools), such facility shall not exceed the maximum 140,000 gross square feet allowed in that Tract. The developer shall be allowed to convert retail land uses to office land uses at a one to one (1:1) ratio, not to exceed 25% of the retail land use allocation, provided only if the converted use is an allowed use in the tract. The developer shall also be allowed to wholly convert the hotel development opportunity of 135 rooms not to exceed 92,000 square feet to 60,000 square feet of gross floor area of business park land uses. All existing land uses and facilities in the Attraction and Junior Deputy Tracts shall not count against the overall trip and land use cap. Senior Housing Intensity: The intensity of any senior housing project shall have a maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 0.60. The 1, 760 dwelling unit cap is only intended to limit the number of single family and multi -family residential units, as those units are defined in the Land Development Code. The development may include in excess of 1,760 residential units if some are developed as senior housing units. With the exception of senior housing development in the C, Commercial Tract, senior housing units shall be developed through the conversion of residential land uses. Residential units shall be allowed for conversion to senior housing units based on the Land Use Conversion Factors, above. However, 1 single-family dwelling unit equates to 1 single-family style independent living units. In no instance shall greater than 450 senior housing units be developed in the entire MPUD. Total Project Intensity: In no event shall the project exceed 3,328 pm Peak Hour Trips. Operational Characteristics for Senior Housing Senior housing may be composed of one or more types of care/housing facilities. These care/housing types are limited to independent living, assisted living, and skilled nursing units, each of which can have varying operational characteristics. The following characteristics of senior housing care units distinguish them from Hacienda Lakes MPUD PL20210001791 Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 1 Packet Pg. 399 3.D.d residential land uses, and all of the characteristics must be provided for and maintained to be considered a senior housing care unit: a. The facility shall be for residents 55 years of age and older; b. There shall be on -site dining facilities to the residents, with food service being on -site, or catered; c. Group transportation services shall be provided for the residents for the purposes of grocery and other types of shopping. Individual transportation services shall be coordinated for the residents needs, including but not limited to medical office visits; d. There shall be an onsite manager/activities coordinator to assist residents, who shall be responsible for planning and coordinating stimulating activities for the residents; e. An on -site wellness facility shall provide exercise and general fitness opportunities for the residents. f. Each unit shall be equipped with devices provided to notify emergency service providers in the event of a medical or other emergency; g. Independent living units shall be designed so that a resident is able to age in place. For example, kitchens may be easily retrofitted by lowering the sink to accommodate a wheelchair bound resident or bathrooms may be retrofitted by adding grab bars. h. Lands described as Hacienda Lakes Tracts G and I and designated as R/MU on the Master Plan are subject to the following: One Hundred Percent (100%) of the units will be restricted to households with 80% Annual Median Income (AMI) or less. This restriction shall remain in place for no less than thirty (30) years from the date issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. In combination with the commitment to affordability, the following operational characteristics apply to this project: a. The facility shall be for residents 62 years of age or older; b. There shall be an onsite manger/ activities coordinator to assist residents, who shall be responsible for planning and coordinating stimulating activities for the residents; c. An on -site wellness facility shall provide exercise and general fitness opportunities for the residents; d. Independent living units shall be designed so that a resident is able to age in place. For example, kitchens may be easily retrofitted by lowering the sink to accommodate a wheelchair bound resident or bathrooms may be retrofitted by adding grab bars. e. The TIS shall use ITE use code 252 Senior Living Attached due to the limited on -site services to better reflect projected trip generation. [HEX 2021-331 In addition to the above operational characteristics, the following site design characteristics apply to the Allegro at Hacienda Lakes project (lands described in PL20200001717): a. All principal structures on Tract I will be set back a minimum of 80 feet from the parcel boundary. fHEX2021-331 b. The one (1) dumpster external to the building on Tract I will be located on the east side of the principal structure and a minimum of 350 feet from the southern property line. The dumpster will be concrete block enclosure with gates and used for disposal of bulk household items only, such as furniture. Household refuse, such as food products, will be housed in trash compactors internal to the principal structure. fHEX2021-331 c. An enhanced 10-foot Type "A" buffer will be provided on Tract I along the portion of the southern property line adjacent to Esplanade at Hacienda Lakes meeting the following minimum specifications: 1. Total of 44 trees comprised of 11 canopy trees and 33 sabal palms. Hacienda Lakes MPUD PL20210001791 Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 1 Packet Pg. 400 3.D.d 2. Canopy trees shall be a minimum of 10 feet tall at the time of planting. 3. Sabal palm trees shall be a minimum of 15'-30' staggered height at time of planting grouped in clusters with a minimum of three (3) palms per cluster, 10 feet on center. [HEX2021-331 d. Temporary construction fencing with a minimum height of five (5) feet shall be installed along the southern and eastern property lines throughout the duration of construction activities and shall include screen mesh fabric. [HEX2021-331 e. A 6-foot-tall earthtone (brown or beige) PVC fence shall be installed along the southern portion of the eastern property line as shown on Exhibit C-1. [HEX2021-331 £ All light fixtures/poles will be limited to a maximum height of 25 feet and will be "Dark Skies" compliant. Exterior wall lighting, on the buildings shall not be located above the second story. [HEX2021-331 g. On -site security measures shall include a recorded license plate reader at the entrance to the Allegro at Hacienda Lakes. All recorded data is private and confidential and will be provided to law enforcement upon their request. fHEX2021-331 h. The developer/operator agrees to provide a Resident Assurance Check -In Program materially consistent Florida Housing Finance Corporation requirements as referenced below: The developer will provide and use an established system of checking in with each resident on a pre -determined basis not less than once per day, at no cost to the resident. Residents may opt out of this program with a written certificate that they choose not to participate. [HEX2021-331 Sign Development Standards Boundary Markers shall be no greater than 15 feet in height, and shall not exceed 64 square feet of sign content area (See Exhibit E, Deviation #3). Each of these permitted signs shall only contain the name of the project or any major use, insignia or motto of the entire development. Any signage proposed for identifying the on -site Swamp Buggy Attraction land use in the Commercial Tract may be illuminated and manually changeable so the traveling public may learn of upcoming events in the Attraction Tract. Any land uses permitted within the boundaries of the MPUD shall be considered on -site for the purposes of providing for signage within the Commercial Tract. Site Development, or Plat Approval • At the time of each development order application subsequent to rezone approval, the developer or its successors and assigns shall submit a list of previously approved land uses (approved via site development plan, or plat), and the trips, commercial square footage and residential units consumed to date. Developer shall also provide to County a copy of its master list of land uses and converted uses for this PUD with each SDP or plat application in the form attached as Exhibit G. Hacienda Lakes MPUD PL20210001791 Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 2 Packet Pg. 401 3.D.d TABLE I RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SETBACK SINGLE FAMILY ZERO LOT TWO FAMILY/ TOWNHOUSE MULTI -FAMILY CLUB HOUSE/ RECREATION DETACHED LINE DUPLEX DWELLINGS BLDGS Principal Structures Minimum Lot Area 4,800 SF 4,000 SF 1 t 00 SF per 1,800 SF per lot 1 acre 10,000 SF Minimum Lot width 40' 35' 35' per lot 18' per lot or unit 150' N/A 15' or 15' or BH, 15' or BH, 15' or'/z BH, 15' or BH, 15' or BH, Minimum Distance From BH, whichever is whichever is whichever is whichever is whichever is MPUD Boundary ** whichever is greater. greater. greater. greater. greater. greater. 20" or 15' 20', or 15' 20', or 15' 20' or''/z BH, with side Front Yard Setback load kith side with side 20' whichever is N/A load garages load garages greater. garages Side Yard 5 0' or 10' 0' or 6' 0' or 6' /z BH N/A 15' or''/2 BH, Rear Yard 15' 15' 15' 15' whichever is N/A greater From Preserve 25' 25' 25' 25' 25' 25' Maximum Zoned Height 35' 35' 35' 45' 75' 40' Maximum Actual Height 42' 42' 42' 50' 85' 50' Floor Area Minimum (SF) 1200 SF 1000 SF 1000 SF 900 SF -650 SF N/A 15' or''/z Minimum Distance Between 12' 10, 12' 12' /2 SBH SBH, Principal Structures whichever is greater Accessory Structures Front SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS Side SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS Rear 5' 5' 5' 5' 5' 10, From Preserve 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, Minimum Distance Between Accessory Structures on 0' or 10' 0' or 10' 0' or 10' 0' or 10' 0' or 10' 0' or 10' same lot Minimum Distance Between Accessory and Principal 0' or 10' 0' or 10' 0' or 10' 0' or 10' 0' or 10' 0' or 10' Structures on same lot Maximum Zoned Height SPS SPS SPS SPS 35' SPS Maximum Actual Height SPS SPS SPS SPS 35' SPS 15' or''/2 15' or BH 15' or''/� BH 15' or''/� BH 15' or''/� BH 15' or %BH Minimum Distance From BH whichever is whichever is whichever is whichever is whichever is MPUD Boundary ** whichever greater greater greater greater greater is greater SPS: Same as Principal Structure LL: Lot Line BOC: Back of Curb Paseo: A pedestrian only access way to and from residences. N/A: Not Applicable BH: Zoned Building Height SBH: Sum of Building Heights "Principal and Accessory Uses shall not protrude or encroach into any required landscape buffer Hacienda Lakes MPUD PL20230016103 Last Revised: March 21, 2024 Words stfuek thr-e gl are deleted; Words underlined are added Page 2 Packet Pg. 402 3.D.d i. If the parcel is served by a public or private road right-of-way, the setback is measured from the adjacent right-of-way line. ii. If the parcel is served by a non -platted private drive, the setback is measured from the back of curb or edge of pavement. iii. For corner lots, only one (1) front yard setback shall be required. The yard that does not contain the driveway/vehicular access to the residence shall provide 10' setback. This setback applies only to single family detached, zero lot line, and two family/duplex dwelling types with a maximum zoned building height of 35'. At the time of platting, intersections subject to the secondary front yard setback shall demonstrate compliance with sight distance triangles as set forth in LDC Section 6.06.05. [HEX 2015-06 & HEX 2016201 - Notes: 1) Structures adjacent to a lake may have no setback from the lake maintenance easement. 2) Entrance features (i.e.: guardhouse, clock towers and colonnades) are limited in height to no greater than 35 feet in actual height. 3) Two or three story multi -family structures may have terraced setbacks. Terraced setbacks shall be measured from the ground floor exterior wall, as long as a minimum 15-foot building wall setback is provided as depicted in Figure 1 below. 4) For all residential units, garages shall be located a minimum of 23 feet from the back of the sidewalk closest to the garage, except for side loaded garages, wherein a parking area 23 feet in depth must be provided perpendicular to the sidewalk to prevent vehicles being parked across a portion, or all of the referenced sidewalk. 5) No residential buildings greater than 50 feet in actual height shall be permitted west of the Florida Power and Light easement. 6) Minimum distance between principal structures for multi -family dwellings shall be 20 feet for multi -family buildings where both buildings have a zoned height less than 35 feet, or 1/2 SBH for multi -family buildings exceeding 35 feet in zoned height, only for multi -family buildings within Azure at Hacienda Lakes, as depicted on Exhibit B-2, attached hereto. [HEX 2016-201 7) In the event the property is developed as a unified development with the San Marino PUD in the area west of the FPL easement, a zero -foot setback shall be allowed along the common property PUD boundary and no landscape buffer shall be required (See deviation #18). 8) Where the property owner in the San Marino PUD agrees to the elimination of a buffer east of the FPL Easement, a ten -foot setback shall be allowed along the common property PUD boundary and no landscape buffer shall be required (See deviation #18). Hacienda Lakes MPUD PL20210001791 Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 2 Packet Pg. 403 3.D.d PROI LI Figure 1 Terraced Setbacks PRESERVE ' MIN. REAR YARD SACCESSORY STRUCTURE SETBACK 10 FOOT MINIMUM ACCESSORY STRUCTURE SETBACK I I FROM PRESERVE I I 15' MIN. REAR YARD PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK 25 FOOT MINIMUM PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK I ACC STR . FROM PRESERVE I F I 6' MIN. 12' MIN 8' MIN, 6' MIN. SIDE YARD PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK I PRINCIPAL I 23' MIN. STRUCTURE (NP.) I I I I FRONT YARD PRINCIPAL I `�12AIN FRONT YARD PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK I 15' MIN. •_ 23' MIN. STRUCTURE SETBACK ROW S' SIDEWALK—► BACK OF CURB 10' MIN. CENTERLINE i — — — — ACC. STR. - ACCESSORY STRUCTURE NOT TO SCALE NOT DRAWN PROPORTIONALLY Figure 2 Detached Single -Family Units Hacienda Lakes M UD PL20210001791 Last Revised: January 28, 2022 N d Y J cC C N cC 2 a M O O O O M N O N J a In 0 CD PC Page 2 Packet Pg. 404 3.D.d PRESERVE 5' MIN. REAR YARD ACCESSORY STRUCTURE SETBACK 10 FOOT MINIMUM ACCESSORY �_---------_-� ��---- STRUCTURE SETBACK I FROM PRESERVE I I I I 15' MIN. REAR YARD PRINCIPAL 1 I I STRUCTURE SETBACK 25 FOOT MINIMUM PRINCIPAL I ACC. I I 1 STRUCTURE SETBACK FROM PRESERVE I 1 I I I I I 10' MIN. 10' MIN. ' MIN. SIDE YARD PRINCIPAL 10' MIN. HTRUICTURE I SETBACK 1 1 PRINCIPAL 1 I 23' MIN. STRUCTURE I (n'P.) II 1 I F 1 F I FRONT YARD PRINCIPAL If i — I -I '—FRONT YARD PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK I I I 20 I Al STRUCTURE XrMM 15' MIN. MI . ROW —MIL 5' SIDEWALK— BACK OF CURB 10' MIN. CENTERLINE — — — — ACC. STIR. - ACCESSORY STRUCTURE NOT TO SCALE NOT DRAWN PROPORTIONALLY 10 FCIOT MINIMUM ACCESSORY -� STRUCTURE SETBACK FROM PRESERVE 25 FCOT WNIYW PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK FROM PRESERVE Figure 3 Detached Single-Family/Zero Lot Line Units `i PRESERVE J () 5' YIN. REAR YARD ACCESSORY ..��/./��./�✓•..�•��' STRVCIURE Si'1EiACK I I 1 I r 15' MIN. REAR YARD PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK ACC. STIR. ACC. M. I r I I MIN. � I 1 � r23' YIN. I i � ROW rROW rM0 PRINGPAL 1 i STRUCTURE SERICK I 15' MIN. 5' SIDEWALK----- WK OF W 10' YIN. CI]:TERUNE AM STA. - ACCESSORY STRUCTURE Hacienda Lakes MPUD PL20210001791 Last Revised: January 28, 2022 I i I I 12' YIN. Imo_ � 1 PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE (rep.) � r i I 20� 2 . NOT TO SCALE NOT DRAWN PROPORTIONALLY Figure 4 Duplex and Two -Family Units I I NO SIDE YARD REWIRED FOR F ATTACHED PRINCIPAL UNITS 1 I IS MIN, SIDE YARD PRINWAL STRUCTURE SETBACK f I N O) Y IC J fO C N U 2 a M O O O O M N O N J d II') r O O) N Page 2 Packet Pg. 405 3.D.d PRESERVE S' YIN. REAR YARD ACCESSORY STRUCTURE SETBACK 10 FM MMMUM ACCESSORY P MIN. REAR YARD PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACKpryyE I I I I STRUCTURE SETBACK FROM I I I I I I I OR 25 FOOT MINIMUM PRINCIPAL I I ATT SCHED YARO UOL UNIREDTS STRUCTURE SETBACK I FROM PRESERVE 12' 1 I MIN. PRINC�/4L STRUCTURE 6 YIN. SIDE YARD PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK I I I I FRONT YARD PRINCIPAL STRVCTURE SETBACK I I 44-L 20 MIN.M ROW I - - 5' SIDEWALK BACK OF CURB 10' MIN. CENTERLINE - __F - - - NOT TO SCALE NOT DRAWN PROPORTIONALLY Figure 5 Attached Single -Family and Townhouse Units TWV LINE IC FM YMIMUM SET600 fRW POCKPOE 26 FOOT INIIIIIRIY I PRMCPAL STTKJCium 9E76AC11 FAOY PRESERVE WE YAM PRHCPAL I SIRL 11NE SEIIMCc i TRICE LN1E�� MONT YARD PMNCWAL ! SRRRCRII¢ jE7BAp�— ACCESS FASEYQR/AW 5' SIOEIY" BAGS OF �a ACC. SM - ACCESSM STRUCTURE NM TO SCALE Wr DRAIIII PROPORI OW"Y Figure 6 Multi -Family Units Hacienda Lakes MPUD PL20210001791 Last Revised: January 28, 2022 15' WI• REAR YAM PfaNWAL SYAl1CTUK SETBACK Y fC J C 01 U fO 2 a M O to r O O M N O N J d LO r O Cn N Page 2 Packet Pg. 406 3.D.d TABLE II COMMERCIAL, INCLUDING MIXED USE BUILDINGS, PUBLIC FACILITY, AND SENIOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS DEVELOPMENTSTANDARD PRINCIPAL USES ACCESSORY USES 1NIMUM LOT AREA 10,000 SQUARE FEET N/A 1NIMUM LOT WIDTH 100 FEET N/A INIMUM YARDS (MEASURED FROM LOT BOUNDARY) 25 FEET OR %2 THE BUILDING HEIGHT, WHICHEVER IS GREATER* * * 10 FEET INIMUM YARDS (MEASURED FROM MPUD BOUNDARIES * * * * 25 FEET 10 FEET RESERVE SETBACK 25 FEET 10 FEET IN. DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES 15 FT. OR'/2 THE SUM OF BUILDING HEIGHTS* 10 FEET AXIMUM ZONED HEIGHT 50 FEET***** 25 FEET AXIMUM ACTUAL HEIGHT 60 FEET***** 30 FEET 1NIMUM FLOOR AREA — COMMERCIAL MINIMUM FLOOR AREA - SENIOR HOUSING MINIMUM FLOOR AREA - PUBLIC FACILITY 600 SQUARE FEET** 350 SQUARE FEET 1,500 SQUARE FEET N/A N/A N/A IN. GROSS FLOOR AREA PER UNIT 600 SQUARE FEET** 80 SQUARE FEET** * Whichever is greater ** Not applicable to kiosks *** General application for setbacks: Front yard setbacks shall comply with the following: i. If the parcel is served by a public or private road right-of-way, the setback is measured from the adjacent right-of-way line. ii. If the parcel is served by a non -platted private drive, the setback is measured from the back of curb or edge of pavement. **** Principal and Accessory Structures shall not protrude or encroach into any required landscape buffer. ***** except that a hotel, destination resort, senior housing or mixed use building maybe up to 75 feet in zoned height and 85 feet in actual height. Note: Any independent living unit proposed for development in a single-family type of configuration shall comply with the development standards for single-family land uses set forth in Table I. Hacienda Lakes MPUD PL20210001791 Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 2 Packet Pg. 407 3.D.d TABLE III BUSINESS PARK AND SCHOOL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS (EXCLUDES COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT PUBLIC SCHOOLS) DEVELOPMENTSTANDARD PRINCIPAL USES ACCESSORY USES INIMUM LOT AREA 8,000 SQUARE FEET N/A INIMUM LOT WIDTH 80 FEET N/A INIMUM YARDS (MEASURED FROM TRACT 50 FEET*** 10 FEET BOUNDARY)- BUSINESS PARK INIMUM YARDS (MEASURED FROM TRACT 50 FEET*** 25 FEET BOUNDARY) -SCHOOL INIMUM YARDS (MEASURED FROM MPUD N/A N/A BOUNDARIES RESERVE SETBACK 25 FEET 10 FEET IN. DISTANCE BETWEEN 15 FT. OR'/2 THE SUM OF 10 FEET STRUCTURES- BUSINESS PARK BUILDING HEIGHTS IN. DISTANCE BETWEEN OR 18 FEET 10 FEET STRUCTURES -SCHOOL AXIMUM ZONED HEIGHT - BUSINESS PARK 35 FEET 35 FEET AXIMUM ZONED HEIGHT - SCHOOL 50 FEET 50 FEET AXIMUM ACTUAL HEIGHT- BUSINESS PARK 50 FEET 35 FEET MAXIMUM ACTUAL HEIGHT - SCHOOL 60 FEET 60 FEET INIMUM FLOOR AREA- BUSINESS PARK 1000 SQUARE FEET N/A INIMUM FLOOR AREA - SCHOOL OR 350 SQUARE FEET 35 SQUARE FEET IN. GROSS FLOOR AREA PER UNIT BUSINESS PARK 500 SQUARE FEET 80 SQUARE FEET SCHOOL N/A N/A * Whichever is greater *** General application for setbacks: Front yard setbacks shall comply with the following: i. If the parcel is served by a public or private road right-of-way, the setback is measured from the adjacent right-of-way line. ii. If the parcel is served by a non -platted private drive, the setback is measured from the back of curb or edge of pavement. The Lord's Way Access Improvements: In the event that Tract BP is developed as a business park, the Lord's Way shall be improved by the Developer with roadway facilities as depicted by LDC Appendix B-4, a Commercial/Industrial typical roadway section, prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for a business park land use. In the event that Tract BP is developed as an educational facility, the Lord's Way shall be improved by the Developer as depicted by LDC Appendix 8-3, a Local Street typical roadway section. Hacienda Lakes MPUD PL20210001791 Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 2 Packet Pg. 408 3.D.d TABLE IV ATTRACTION AND JUNIOR DEPUTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PRINCIPAL USES ACCESSORY USES MINIMUM LOT AREA 1 ACRE N/A MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 100 FEET N/A MINIMUM YARDS (MEASURED FROM TRACT BOUNDARY) 20 FEET, PLUS 1 FOOT FOR EACH 2 FEET OF BLDG. HT. OVER50 FEET 20 FEET MINIMUM YARDS (MEASURED FROM MPUD BOUNDARIES 25 FEET 20 FEET PRESERVE SETBACK 25 FEET 10 FEET MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES 15 FT. OR'h THE SUM OF BUILDING HEIGHTS* 10 FEET MAXIMUM ZONED HEIGHT 50 FEET 50 FEET MAXIMUM ACTUAL HEIGHT 75 FEET 75 FEET MINIMUM FLOOR AREA 1000 SQUARE FEET** N/A * Whichever is greater ** Not applicable to modular units, trailers, towers, camping pavilion, and similar structures to support the utilization of the attraction facilities, which have no minimum floor area limitations Parking for Junior Deputy: Required parking for the JD designated areas of the MPUD shall be calculated at the rate of one parking space for each 1000 square feet of covered camping pavilion. Junior Deputy Target Orientation: Archery and air rifle ranges shall be oriented for a line of fire only to the east, or north, and shall have a back stop that shall be comprised of absorbing materials such as an earthen berm, hay bales, or similar treatments, each installed according to industry standards, to prohibit projectiles from exiting the range area. Hacienda Lakes MPUD PL20210001791 Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 2 Packet Pg. 409 3.D.d Approved by HEX Decision 2015-06 B_1 ESPLANADE AT HACIENDA LAKES PROJECT LOCATION MAP Exhibit B Page 3 of 3 Packet Pg. 410 Approved by HEX Decision 2016-20 EXHIBIT B-2 AZURE AT HACIENDA LAKES PROJECT LOCATION MAP Exhibit "l" Page 3 of 7 Packet Pg. 411 3.D.d Insert Exhibit B-3 EXHIBIT B-3 HACIENDA LAKES NORTH PROJECT LOCATION MAP ?R-E.PARED VOR' FLORIDA CERTIFICATE OF AUTH ROI2ATION 1,11611 `'`roll Brother, SECTION:14 TOWNSHIP:50 RANGE:26 WENGINEERING AM ERi CA'5 LIl%II RY HOME 8II ILOER` CMUER COUNTY, FLOR IDA nmi �nrr«¢an,c�-4-1—Dn rMI—iuxs 2420I WA WEN CENTER DRIVE, SOITL 2f4 BON[TASPRINGS.FLORIDA34134 F3LCNAME: I2R4i00E15 V"IT,$FRW�M°FL,�;05� R. 259b03TTTT 1: 23?603T9P4 PHONE: (239) 596-6600 SHEET: I OF 1 cxai: ��..nbroome..nae.aa. Hacienda Lakes MPUD PL20210001791 Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 3 Packet Pg. 412 3.D.d P, .PRESERVE TRACT LAND USE SUMMARY DESIGNATOR LAUD USE ACREAGE 'C'" COMMERCIAL 34.16t ACRES 'COMMERCIAL LANDS ENCUMBERED BY PUBLIC ROW TRACT ""2.513 ACRES "A" ATTRACTION 07.27t ACRES 'R' RESIDENTIAL 4474Bt ACRES BUSINESS PARK 35,3%ACRES 'P PRESERVE 1546.11t ACRES PUBLIC FACIUTY 1.33t ACRES 'JD" JUNIOR DEPUTY 21.62t ACRES "S" SCHOOL 1S.SSt ACRES "R/MU" RESIDENTIALJMEDICAL USE 138.8aACRES "ROW' I PUBLIC ROW/ EASEMENTS 17004tACRES TOTAL 1 2262.14t ACRES THE COMBINED TOTAL OF THESE TWO ACREAGES EQUALS THE ACTIVITY CENTER ACREAGE OF 38.87 EXCLUDE THIS ACREAGE WHEN TOTALING PROJECT AREA AS IT IS INCLUDED IN THE RICUITUR y ¢ - _ - _ 'ROW' TRACT B 0FED WLLGW RUN RPUD Y2 y n LEGEND w A - ArrnncnoN TRACT O'21 P - BUSINESS PARK R g = _ � R _ C - COMMERCIAL vAu - R L��JJ R UN RPUO P PRESERVE TRACT •9EE NOTE u PF PUBUC FACILITIES TRACT (EMS) R P, JO JUNIOR DEPUTY PRESERVE MBLY ioeA O R O f ' ` TRACT s _ SCHOOLS MMS BI SPUD ,1J/ •L 7 R RESIDENTIAL TRACT wAswAlwN — • _ • .• L " RIMU - RESIDENTIAL I MEDICAL USE ROW - PUBLIC ROW I EASEMENTS c �umru o. w" L _ IAQRICULTURE PROPOSED PUBIC R.O.W. A _.. - 11 SERVE_ r lR10EVELOPEO � RESERVATION sTbN ACT _ ED ACCESS EASES NOT EXISTING ACCESSED FORV VACATION PROPOSED FOR VACATION 7 11"11111111 1I IAGRICULTURE,''1"''IIIIII V .. A, AGRICULTURE a� Y J cC C N cC 2 IL M Q r r 0 M N 0 N J IL Lo 0 N Packet Pg. 413 3.D.d — --COLLIER REG OVAL C MEDICAL CENTER PCO L = RnAu 9 RPUD ROCKEDGE R /l L R L � R R L L A. AGRICULTURE ow HOMES AND PRIVATE + nm N AAGRILlATWE SERY USES H NGR'—TILY SS GNIMBbUSES ES �gN LAND USE SUMMARY DESIGNATOR IANOUBE ACREAGE "C' COMMERCILL S1.IBL ACRES 'COMMERCIAL lAN05 ENCUMBERED BY PUBLIC ROIN TRACT "2.SU ACRES ATTRACTION 47 27i ACRES RESIDENTIAL 447.Bh AMES 'BP BUSINESS PARK BB.BSB ACRES PRESERVE UuuLI1i ACRES "Pp PUBLIC FACILITY I. ACRES "IC JUNIOR DEPUTY CR 2162, AES "S' SCHOOL 19 XH ACRES 'EE RESIDENTIALIMECICAL USE 28.82a ACRES "ROW' PUBLIGROWIEASEMENT9 TO -ACRES TOTAL 2-1h ACRES Pf PUBLIC fAquTIEt TRACT IEMB1 T. K - - - -Z- ------------ � -TCH LINE -9EE SHEET 1 .. _ - AAGR CULTURE IINOF/ELOPED i — — — — TitLJCGwG • -TRACT!" - - -------------- N A AGRICULTURE UNDEVELOPED AI AGRICULTURE DEVELOPED A,AGRICU TUBE iMOEVELOPEO AAGRICULTWE A,AGRICULTORE GRED UNDEVELOPED — —P - — _ — — — AAGRICULTURE �E(ARCELR —�RRES£RVE",. — — — — — -• UNDEVELOPED 7i3dC,�' - P. -... PRESERVE TRACT A AGRICULTURE UNDEVELOPED 'A Packet Pg. 414 3.D.d HACIENDA LAKES NATIVE PRESERVE SUMMARY DESCRIPTION TOTAL URBAN(AC) RURAL(AC) PROJECT AREA 2262A4 625.07 1637.07 ON -SITE NATIVE VEGETATION 1721.97 295.38 1426S9 LESS THE NATIVE M WITHIN RATTLESNAKE HAMFt 1M 2.02 2.02 0.00 LESS THE NATIVE VEC WRHON THE LORDS WAY EST. OA2 0.42 0011 LESS THE NATIVE VEO WITHIN THE SWNEELD ROAD CORRICOR II'm 5.01 5.93 LESS THE NATIVE VEO WITHIN ARCHAEOLOGICAL PRPS'SRVES 6.07 1.06 5.02 NATIVE VEGETATION FOR REQUIREMENT CALCULATIONS 1702.46 286.87 1415+64 PERCENTAGE FOR REQUIRED NATIVE PRESERVE 25% REQUIRED NATIVE VEGETATION <921.09 71.71 -249.39 PRESERVED NATIVE VEGETATION-- 1395.33 d0.81 1354.54 COMPENSATENO NATIVE PRESERVE (k URP DEPIQT)^ 61.80 TOTAL PRESERVE AREA 1546.11 53.06 149305 NATIVE PRESERVE REQUIREMENT (LDC SUBSECTION 2.05.02 B.2.G.IIJ OF 90% WITHIN THE RFMUD SENDING LANDS EXCEEDS 60% OF THE TOTAL PROJECT RFMUD SENDING LANDS, THEREFORE, OVER 60% OF THE TOTAL PROJECT RFMUD SENDING LANDS SHALL BE THE REQUIRED RURAL NATIVE VEGETATION AREA COMPLIANCE WITH LDC SUBSECTION 3.05.07 H.A.A., REQUIRES NATIVE VEGETATION PLANTING ENHANCEMENT OF A MINIMUM OF 12.24 ACRES OF THE PROJECTS URF SUBDISTRICT PRESERVE TRACT. COMPLIANCE WITH 100%OF THE NATIVE VEGETATION PRESERVATION REQUIREMENT SHALL BE ACHIEVED THROUGH PRESERVING RFMUD PROJECT NATIVE VEGETATION IN AN AMOUNT TWO TIMES THE DEFICIENT NATIVE VEGETATION PRESERVE ACREAGE IN THE URF SUBDISTRICT PROJECT LANDS AS IS PROVIDED FOR THROUGH THE ADOPTED GMP AMENDMENT. MPUD MASTER PLAN NOTES: 1. WITHIN THE MPUD BOUNDARIES THERE WILL BE A MINIMUM OF 60% USEABLE OPEN SPACE. 2. THE FACILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PUD MASTER PLAN SHALL BE CONSIDERED CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE, 3. THE DESIGN, LOCATION, AND CONFIGURATION OF THE LAND IMPROVEMENTS, LAKES, AND/OR ENTRY POINTS SHALL BE DEFINED AT EITHER SDP OR CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND PLAT APPROVAL. 4. IF THE ROAD EASEMENTS IN THE PETITION PL20210002687 ARE VACATED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, THEN THESE ACCESS CONNECTIONS ARE ALLOWED. IF THE PETITION FOR VACATION IS NOT APPROVED, THEN THESE ACCESS CONNECTIONS ARE NOT ALLOWED. 5. SEE EXHIBIT C-2 FOR NORTH AREA DEVIATION LOCATIONS. MAXIMUM DENSITY AND INTENSITY RESIDENTIAL DENSITY: THIS MPUD SHALL BE UMITED TO 1,760 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS (DU) THAT EQUATES TO A DENSITY OF 0.78 DWELLING UNITS PER GROSS ACRE, THE 1,760 RESIDENTIAL UNITS ARE EITHER SINGLE OR MULTI -FAMILY UNITS AS DEFINED IN THE LOC. NO MORE THAN 1.232 MULTI -FAMILY UNITS MAY BE CONSTRUCTED IN THE ENTIRE PUD. CARETAKER'S RESIDENCES SHALL BE DEDUCTED FROM THE 1,780 UNIT ALLOCATION. A MINIMUM OF 25 RESIDENTIAL UNITS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN THE R/MU TRACT, AND A MINIMUM OF 17 RESIDENTIAL UNITS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN TRACT C. THE BALANCE OF THE RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS GENERATED FROM TRACT C (13 UNITS) MUST BE CONSTRUCTED IN EITHER THE R/MU TRACT, OR ON A PORTION OF TRACT R, WITHIN ONE-THIRD OF ONE MILE OF THE BOUNDARY OF TRACT C RESIDENTIAL DENSITY: 1.0 RESIDENTIAL UNIT EQUATES TO 4 SENIOR HOUSING UNITS (NOT TO EXCEED 450 SENIOR HOUSING UNITS IN THE ENTIRE PUD). UP TO 1.232 OF THE TOTAL 1,760 RESIDENTIAL UNITS MAY BE MULTI -FAMILY AS DEFINED IN THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. COMMERCIAL INTENSITY: HACIENDA LAKES IS INTENDED TO BE DEVELOPED WITH A MIXTURE OF COMMERCIAL LAND USES THAT INCLUDE 327,500 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF RETAIL USES, 50,000 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF MEDICAL OFFICE USES, 20,000 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF GENERAL OFFICE USES, 140,000 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF BUSINESS PARK LAND USES, AND 135 HOTEL ROOMS. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE PROJECT EXCEED 3,328 PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS. SUCH MAXIMUM TRIP GENERATION CAP WAS DEVELOPED BASED ON 327,500 GROSS SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL LAND USES, 50,000 GROSS SQUARE FEET OF MEDICAL OFFICE LAND USES, 20.000 GROSS SQUARE FEET OF GENERAL OFFICE LAND USES, 140,000 GROSS SQUARE FEET OF BUSINESS PARK LAND USES, A PRIMARY SCHOOL WITH A CONTEMPLATED ENROLLMENT OF 919 STUDENTS, 135 HOTEL ROOMS, NOT TO EXCEED 92,000 GROSS SQUARE FEET, 704 SINGLE-FAMILY UNITS, AND 1,056 MULTI -FAMILY UNITS. HOWEVER, THE HOTEL SHALL NOT COUNT AGAINST THE 140,000 SQUARE FOOT CAP ASSOCIATED WITH THE BUSINESS PARK. SHOULD THE BP TRACT NOT BE DEVELOPED AS A BUSINESS PARK BUT BE DEVELOPED AS A SCHOOL (EXCLUDING COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT PUBLIC SCHOOLS), SUCH FACILITY SHALL NOT EXCEED THE MAXIMUM 140,000 GROSS SQUARE FEET ALLOWED IN THAT TRACT. THE DEVELOPER SHALL BE ALLOWED TO CONVERT RETAIL LAND USES TO OFFICE LAND USES AT A ONE TO ONE (1:1) RATIO, NOT TO EXCEED 25% OF THE RETAIL LAND USE ALLOCATION PROVIDED ONLY IF THE CONVERTED USE IS AN ALLOWED USE IN THE TRACT. THE DEVELOPER SHALL. BE ALLOWED TO WHOLLY CONVERT THE HOTEL DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY OF 135 ROOMS NOT TO EXCEED 92,000 SQUARE FEET TO 60,000 SQUARE FEET OF BUSINESS PARK LAND USES. ALL EXISTING LAND USES AND FACILITIES IN THE ATTRACTION AND JUNIOR DEPUTY TRACTS SHALL NOT COUNT AGAINST THE OVERALL TRIP AND LAND USE CAP. SENIOR HOUSING INTENSITY: THE INTENSITY OF ANY SENIOR HOUSING PROJECT SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR) OF 0.50. THE DWELLING UNIT CAP IS ONLY INTENDED TO LIMIT THE NUMBER OF SINGLE-FAMILY AND MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL UNITS AS THOSE UNITS ARE DEFINED IN THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, THE DEVELOPMENT MAY INCLUDE IN EXCESS OF 1,760 RESIDENTIAL UNITS IF SOME ARE DEVELOPED AS SENIOR HOUSING UNITS, WATH THE EXCEPTION OF SENIOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT IN THE C COMMERCIAL TRACT, SENIOR HOUSING UNITS SHALL BE DEVELOPED THROUGH THE CONVERSION OF RESIDENTIAL LAND USES. RESIDENTIAL UNITS SHALL BE ALLOWED FOR CONVERSION TO SENIOR HOUSING UNITS BASED ON THE LAND USE CONVERSION FACTORS ABOVE. HOWEVER, 1 SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT EQUATES TO 1 SINGLE-FAMILY STYLE INDEPENDENT UVING UNITS. IN NO INSTANCE SHALL GREATER THAN 450 SENIOR HOUSING UNITS BE DEVELOPED IN THE MPUD. TOTAL PROJECT INTENSITY: IN NO EVENT SHALL THE PROJECT EXCEED 3.325 PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS. i :1 1 M 0 r r 0 0 M N 0 N J IL Ln 0 CD N i d 7 u O c CL V m m T C m 2 CL a M d E t m a CD E m a Packet Pg. 415 3.D.d LEGEND H INGRESS/EGRESS Approved by HEX Decision 2021-33 NORTH LAKE PROJECT AREA = 6.71t ACRES TRACT "C" = COMMERCIAL NOT TO SCA!F TRACT "R/MU" = RESIDENTIAL/MEDICAL USE TRACT "R" = RESIDENTIAL RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK ROAD TRACT ncn J TRACT IIR11 I — — — — "I COLLIER REGIONAL PALACIO MEDICAL CENTER TERRACE PALACIO NORTH TERRACE �"------------ WESTI l HACIENDA LAKES MPUD EXHIBIT C-1: R/MU ACCESS TO ' RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK ROAD'ENGINEERING PREPARED FOR: SECTION: TOWNSHIP: RANGE: I COLLIERCOUNTY Cl-ENGINEERING I PLANNING LANDSWE ARCNITECTUAE HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC 23 50 26 FLORIDA 28100 BONITO GRANDE DRIVE -SUITE 305 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34133 7742 ALICO ROAD REVISION DATE: 11/11/2020 P:739.405.7777F:R39-405.7899 FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912 SHEET: I OF 11 EMAI``'R1°`a aIdmpeREIRer,+RR.cm N d Y J C N u 0 M O to O M N O N J d r O O) Packet Pg. 416 Property line enhanced sobal palm buffer 115'-30' staggered ht.) existing 15' wide type'B" — code required canopy tree landscape buffer 110' ht.) ex. 6'wo1' - Esplanade at Allegro at i Hacienda Lakes Hacienda lakes I required 10' wide type 'A' landscape buffer enhanced 10' wide type 'A' landscape buffer existing 6' wall existing 15' wide type'B' landscape buffer SECTION ex. 15' wide type'B' jt t landscape buffer t - - - required 10' wide pork�ny ;` t type 'A' landscape t buffer t ' t — — existing 6' wall r� �1� I 1 i y 'I lake 1 I open 80"b1dg setback. space L C- J dF Oka t i 1 I / t a exisung ^�i homes S17E PLAN Southern h�l�e�=.-; D -a -a O CD Q Q 2 m 0 CD n N 0 N_ c� W IIIMCDowCt:� Attachment: Attachment 3 - Applicant Backup Documents (29015 : PL20230016103 - PDI - Hacienda Lakes) 3.D.d I I I I I I � I I I A, AGRICULTUF i UNDEVELOPEI I® i I ®® R �I rnI I® R RI w( ,ui m I i I w J l I FIRST j MINIS S I I o la z_ LU � 'Y LU IN LEGEND A - ATTRACTION TRACT ROW RUSLIC ROW/EASEMENTS YP - BUSNESSPARK Q DEVIATION LOCATION P - PRESERVETRACT PROPOSED, CROW. RESERVATION PP PUSLICFACILRIESTRACT(EMS) RELOCATED OR E%ISTINO R - RESIDENTIAL TRACT L� ACCESS EASEMENTS NOT PROPOSED FOR VACATION • IF THE ROAD EASEMENTS IN THE PETITION PLN110S038S] ARE VACATED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, THEN THESE ACCESS CONNECTIONS ARE ALLOWED. IF THE PETITION FOR VACATION IS NOT APPROVED. THEN THESE ACCESS CONNECTIONS ME NOT ALLOWED WILLOW RUN RPUD �' �� Q o I LL Z iw x LW 10 F- K Li of X F ILL F- J V% LU 1� 9 in w IX w ZDo i i w Q; X C` I R R L R L R 7® WILLOWIRUN RPUD L �* R I BP ABLY 35 38 AC, L R L PUD ROW 120' (� RESERVATION f� l I a EXISTING SWAMP f BUGGY BUILDING L% T .I b0' H ENDA �Lu i Z I I P w EXTENSIO A PRESERVE IJ---------- -w I I ., i I I i I EXISTING - 1I RACT d lu �----&-AGRf%fLTtJAE SWAMP SWAMP I I BUGGY ' j ( UNDEVE�OPEp TRACK d Y m J m C N .5 m 661 z �7 a N W � ' 0 �A r 0 N 0 --- ---- - N J OW�/`•' � RI, CC �zx u QA! E ''a¢¢o w x z 3 PRESERVE c° - , TRACT 3 A, AGRICULTURE UNDEVELOPED Packet Pg. 418 3.D.d EXHIBIT D LEGAL DESCRIPTION A TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF COLLIER, LYING IN SECTION I I THROUGH 14 AND 23 THROUGH 25, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST AND SECTION 19 AND 30, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING FURTHER BOUND AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 30; THENCE S.89°10'42"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION FOR 2835.68 FEET TO THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.89011'14"W. ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE FOR 2906.24 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 25; THENCE S.89°09'39"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION FOR 2693.18 FEET TO THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.89°II'01"W. ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE FOR 2693.80 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.00113'35"W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION FOR 2636.34 FEET TO THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.00014'15"W. ALONG SAID WEST LINE FOR 2637,01 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.87007'13"E. ALONG A LINE COMMON TO SAID SECTION 24 AND 25 FOR 1704.07 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 24; THENCE N.01108'02"E. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 684.58 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87012'28"E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 340.01 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.01004'1I"E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2052.01 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.87°28'21"W. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 2025.64 FEET TO THE QUARTER CORNER COMMON TO SAID SECTIONS 23 AND 24; THENCE S.89°01'58"W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23 FOR 1328.51 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.01018'52"W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 679.65 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE S.89022'00"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 663.28 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.01014'38"E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 675.75 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S.89°01'58"W. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 664.25 FEET; THENCE CONTINUE S.89001'58"W. ALONG SAID LINE FOR 627.16 FEET; THENCE N.01°01'15"E. FOR 1699.99 FEET; THENCE S.89°01'58"W. FOR 701.42 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF A 170 FOOT WIDE FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY EASEMENT; THENCE S.01°01'15"W. ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR 68.31 FEET; THENCE S.89001'58"W. FOR 1232.97 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF LANDS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 21, AT PAGE 183 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF SAID COLLIER COUNTY; THENCE N.00°51'54"E. ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR 956.27 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH A LINE 30.00 FEET SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH (AS MEASURED ON A PERPENDICULAR) THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE N.87037'31"E. ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE FOR 1237.00 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY EASEMENT; THENCE N.01001'15"E. ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR 30.05 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE N.87°37'31"E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1337.24 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE N.00148'00"E. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2683.32 TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.87031'38"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 334.19 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00048'I I"E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1341.38 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.8702842"W. ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE FOR 1002.41 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY EASEMENT; THENCE N.00048'45"E. ALONG SAID WEST Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 38 of 75 Packet Pg. 419 1 3.D.d AND EAST LINE FOR 335.13 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.87°27'58"W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1236.32 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID LANDS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 21, AT PAGE 183; THENCE N.00149'30"E. ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR 1004.62 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 11; THENCE N.00050'27"E. ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR 344.07 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE N.87°28'56"E. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 1235.95 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00°49'13"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 342.92 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE N.87125'45"E. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 1336.32 FEET TO THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE CONTINUE N.87025'45"E. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 668.16 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.00°47'37"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 671.11 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 14; THENCE N.87027'14"E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 668.22 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00047'14"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 671.39 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87°28'42"E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 14 1336.55 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE N,87030'06"E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1328.72 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00°38'50"E. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1345.26 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE N.00041'44"E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2707,07 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87140'34"E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1321.29 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00036'23"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2701.30 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION SAID POINT BEING THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE S.87°26'1 I"W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION FOR 662.90 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.00°35'02"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1345.93 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.87030'06"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 664.36 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND SAID SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.00°38'50"W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER FOR 672.63 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87°32'03"E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 665.09 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00035'02"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER FOR 672.97 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.87°33'59"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 665.81 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00038'5I"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER FOR 1345.10 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.87037'27"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 667.27 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.00°42'40"W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1344.51 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 24; THENCE N.87°40'54"E. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 2006.20 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE S.00056'29"W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1368.25 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87034'58"E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1343.68 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00041'32"E. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1365.31 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87°41'38"E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER FOR 1337.58 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.00026'32"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION FOR 1703.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 39 of75 Packet Pg. 420 3.D.d NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE S.87°33' 18"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 672.60 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE 5.00134'02"W. ALONG SAID WEST LINE FOR 1022.89 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87°28'21"E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 674.89 FEET TO THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 19; THENCE S.88°12'42"E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER FOR 3093.52 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.03°39'20"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2676.74 FEET TO THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.88°56'10"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2940.59 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE 5.87007'20"W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 25 FOR 2726.50 FEET TO THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.87°07'13"W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER FOR 807.16 FEET; THENCE S.03°18'31"E. FOR 1451.00 FEET; THENCE N.88056'54"E. FOR 1582.00 FEET; THENCE S.00031'35"E. FOR 1130.61 FEET; THENCE S.89015'59"E. FOR 1823.18 FEET TO THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.89157'58"E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SAID SECTION 30 FOR 2200,53 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.00037'14"W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1344.51 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.89034'43"E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 365.01 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF; THENCE S.00041'48"W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 671.03 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.89023'00"E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 364.14 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.89022'35"E, FOR 710.09 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF; THENCE N.00°52'45"E. FOR 1334.78 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF; THENCE S.89046'12"W, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 356.23 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00°49'34"E. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF FOR 668.60 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.89057'58"E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SAID SECTION 30 FOR 2497.82 FEET TO THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE 5.01 ° 12'08"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION FOR 2640.60 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 101,084,043 SQUARE FEET OR 2,320.E ACRES +/- LESS AND EXCEPT THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCELS: PARCEL "A" BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SAID SECTION 30; THENCE S.00059'10"W. FOR 1329.95 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF; THENCE S.89022'35"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 355.05 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00055'57"E. FOR 1332.36 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF; THENCE N.89046'12"E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 356.23 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 473,270 SQUARE FEET OR 10.9 ACRES +/- PARCEL "B" BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTEROF SAID SECTION 24; THENCE N.87°28'21 "E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1349.77 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00040' 10"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1361.17 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.87017'48"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1356.51 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00056'29"E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 40 of 75 Packet Pg. 421 3.D.d 682.86 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.87°23'02"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 338.41 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.01 000'20"E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 683.43 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87°28'21 "E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 337.61 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 2,072,100 SQUARE FEET OR 47.6 ACRES +/- Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 Page 41 of 75 BCC Approved 10/25/I l Packet Pg. 422 OR 4938 PG 2435 3.D.d Exhibit D-1 Esplanade at Hacienda Lakes Legal Description Approved by HEX Decision 2014-18 Exhibit "A" HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES TRACT A A TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING BOUNDED AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE 4 INCH SQUARE CONCRETE MONUMENT REFERENCED IN FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION CERTIFIED CORNER RECORD NUMBER 84343 MARKING THE EAST ONE QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST; THENCE ALONG THE EAST -WEST ONE QUARTER SECTION LINE OF SAID SECTION 23, SAID LINE BEING THE BASIS _ _ S DESCRIPTION, S.89°01'58"W., FOR 30.03 FEET y ON WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF BENFIELD RO THE POINT OF u NINING OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PARCEL; )A-.- '---. 1 THENCE CONTINUING N SECTION LINE, S.89001'58"W., FOR 1,298.4 " I1�NVN'OE P LB 6990 MARKING THE NORTHER RNER OF THE QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE QUARTET r SAID SECTIONNG THE EAST, SOUTH AND WEST LINES OFF ORUHEAST 0F THE NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER O QUARTER THE FOLLOWING THREE (3) COURSEST ' I!EfC 1!� 9,V � 1. THENCE S.01018'52"W., FOR 679.65 FEET TO A 518" IRON ROD WITH CAP LB 6990 MARKING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER; 2. THENCE S.89022'00"W., FOR 663.28 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD WITH CAP LB 6990 MARKING THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER; 3. THENCE N.01 °14'38"E., FOR 675.75 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD WITH CAP LB 6990 MARKING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER AND A POINT ON SAID EAST -WEST ONE QUARTER SECTION LINE; THENCE ALONG SAID EAST -WEST ONE QUARTER SECTION LINE S.89°01'58"W., FOR 664.25 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD WITH CAP LB 6990 MARKING THE CENTER OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID EAST -WEST ONE QUARTER SECTION LINE S.89°01'58"W., FOR 627.16 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD MARKING THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST ONE HALF OF THE EAST ONE HALF OF THE NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID EAST HALF N.01 °O1'15"E., FOR 1,699.99 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE S.88°5845"E., FOR 445.48 FEET; Page 42 of 75 Packet Pg. 423 3.D.d OR 4938 PG 2436 THENCE N.0100I'l5"E., FOR 400.00 FEET; THENCE S.88058'45"E., FOR 151.77 FEET; THENCE N.0 1 00 I'l 5"E., FOR 457.04 FEET TO A POINT ON THE FUTURE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE FOR RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK ROAD EXTENSION AND A POINT ON A CURVE; THENCE ALONG SAID FVTVRE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE THE FOLLOWING SIX (6) COURSES: 1. THENCE EASTERLY 268.58 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON -TANGENTIAL CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 949.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 16012'55" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS N.82044'27"E. FOR 267.68 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE; 2. THENCE EASTERLY 297.08 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A REVERSE CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 600.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 2802707" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS N.88049'03"E. FOR 294.05 FEET TO A POINT OF COMPWIRMUKYWMEDIF 3. THENCE EASTERLY 211.21��;Uf+ 0 A COMPOUND CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADDD- 1,040.00 FEET A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 11038'09" AND BEING SUB B S.71 01 0'49"E. FOR 210.84 FEET TO A POINT 4. THENCE EASTERLY 54 .8 E CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A P s ANGLE OF 27000'44" AND BEING SUB ED BY A CH O=:V S.78052'07"E. FOR 541.84 FEET; 5. THENCE N.87°37'31"E., FO:K_,�FEETTOAPATURE; 6. THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY '9'F,ES.A1AA'r�T �C OF A TANGENTIAL CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A R&MOB 0 WFEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 9005722" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS S.46053'48"E. FOR 71.30 FEET TO A POINT ON THE FUTURE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF BENFIELD ROAD AND A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE; THENCE ALONG SAID FUTURE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE THE FOLLOWING FOUR (4) COURSES: 1. THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 955.48 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A REVERSE CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,160.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 47011'39" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS S.25°00'56"E. FOR 928.70 FEET; 2. THENCE S.4803646"E., FOR 641.57 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; 3. THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 909.05 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A TANGENTIAL CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,040.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 50004'53" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS S.23034'19"E. FOR 880.38 FEET; 4. THENCE S.01028'07"W., FOR 239.01 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN. Page 43 of 75 Packet Pg. 424 3.D.d EXHIBIT E LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM LDC Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC Subsection 6.06.0l.B, related to streets in subdivisions, that requires subdivisions to have platted road rights -of -way for streets, to allow private streets to be provided by separate access easements rather than platted road rights -of way. Deviation #2 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.04.04.B.5.c that limits the number of model homes, to allow one model home for each variant of the residential product proposed in the various phases or communities within the project. The number of model homes may exceed five for each phase or community within the project, but shall not exceed a total of 60 models for the entire MPUD development. Deviation #3 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02 to allow "boundary marker" signage on property corners fronting on existing, proposed, or future public roadways that provide access to the MPUD. The sign content area for "boundary markers" to be located in the Residential Tract R may be 15 feet in height rather than 8 feet in height as limited in LDC Subsection 5.06.02B.6.b. Deviation #4 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.C.2. that limits fence or wall heights to six (6') feet, to allow fences or walls to be no greater than eight (8') feet throughout the development. Where associated with existing or future public roadways, or Tract A, a 20 foot tall visual screen may be installed as a wall, berm, or wall/berm combination. Deviation #5 seeks relief from LDC Sections 4.02.13 G., and 4.06.02 CS., that requires a six foot tall opaque architecturally finished masonry wall, or berm, or combination thereof be provided around the boundaries of a business park. Buffering around the proposed Business Park Tract would be as required by the entirety of the referenced sections of the LDC, but the six foot wall, or berm, or combination thereof will not be required on the Business Park Tract along the frontage of Lord's Way. Deviation #6 seeks to allow one real estate sign in addition to the real estate signage permitted in LDC Section 5.06.02 B.2., that would be erected off -site from the Residential Tract, in the Commercial Tract. Deviation #7 The existing Swamp Buggy sign located in the southeast corner of Rattlesnake Hammock road and Collier Boulevard shall be allowed to remain in the present location until: the sign is relocated to allow the construction of the bridge to extend Rattlesnake Hammock Road, and/or a new sign can be permitted in Tract C. Deviation #8 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.05.04 D. L that limits care unit Floor Area Ratio (FAR) to 0.45, to allow a care unit FAR of 0.60. Deviation #9 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.6, which allows two (2) ground or wall signs per entrance to a residential development with a maximum height of 8 feet, to allow for one (1) ground sign with a maximum height of 13 feet at the entrance to Esplanade at Hacienda Lakes as shown on Attachment E-2, Esplanade at Hacienda Lakes Entry Sign Location Map. [HEX 2014-181 Deviation #10 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.6, which allows for a maximum height of 8 feet for residential entry signs, to allow for a maximum sign height of 10 feet for residential entry signage at Azure at Hacienda Lakes as depicted on Exhibit E-3, Azure at Hacienda Lakes Primary Sign Plan Elevation Exhibit, Sheet 1 of 3, attached hereto. fHEX 2016-201 Hacienda Lakes MPUD PL20210001791 Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 4 Packet Pg. 425 3.D.d Deviation #11 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.6.b, which permits two (2) ground or wall signs per entrance to the development with a combined sign area of 64 square feet, to allow for one (1) total ground or wall sign with a maximum sign area of 80 square feet at the entrance to the Azure at Hacienda Lakes as depicted on Exhibit E-3, Azure at Hacienda Lakes Primary Sign Plan Elevation Exhibit, Sheet 1 of 3, attached hereto. [HEX 2016-201 Deviation #12 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.J, which prohibits dead-end streets, to allow one (1) dead-end street at the terminus of a local street within the Azure at Hacienda Lakes residential development, as depicted on Exhibit E-3, Sign Location Map, Sheet 3 of 3, attached hereto. fHEX 2016-201 Deviation #13 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.05.021, which requires that off-street parking must be arranged so that no motor vehicles have to back onto any street, excluding single-family and two-family residential dwellings and churches, to allow for back out parking from the proposed off-street parking for multi -family dwellings within the Azure at Hacienda Lakes residential development, as depicted on Exhibit B-2, attached hereto. [HEX 2016-201 Deviation #14 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.6, which allows for a maximum height of 8 feet for residential entry signs, to allow for a maximum sign height of 12 feet for residential entry signage at Hacienda Lakes — North Area as depicted on Exhibit E-4, Hacienda Lakes — North Area Sign Deviation Exhibit, Sheet 2 of 2, attached hereto. Deviation #15 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.6.b, which permits two (2) ground or wall signs per entrance to the development with a combined sign area of 64 square feet, to allow for two (2) ground or wall signs with a combined sign area of 128 square feet which include signage for each of the residential developments which share access to Collier Boulevard at the entrance to the Hacienda Lakes — North Area, as depicted on Exhibit E-4, Hacienda Lakes — North Area Sign Deviation Exhibit, Sheet 1 of 2, attached hereto. Deviation #16 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.14, which allows boundary marker signs to be a maximum of 24 square feet to allow for two boundary marker signs with a maximum of 32 square feet at the Hacienda Lakes — North Area, as depicted on Exhibit E-4, Hacienda Lakes — North Area Sign Deviation Exhibit, Sheet 1 of 2, attached hereto. Deviation #17 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.J, which prohibits dead-end streets except when designed as a cul-de-sac, to allow one (1) dead-end street at the terminus of a local street within the Hacienda Lakes — North Area residential development, as depicted on Exhibit E-4, Hacienda Lakes — North Area Sign Deviation Exhibit, Sheet 1 of 2, attached hereto. Deviation #18 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02, which requires landscape buffers to separate developments, to allow for no buffer along the northern PUD boundary in either or both of the following circumstances: 1) West of the FPL easement if the abutting properties are rezoned or amended to provide for a unified development plan of the northern property (currently Agriculture -zoned property) and the Hacienda Lakes - North Area properties prior to approval of an SDP or PPL; 2) East of the FPL easement if the abutting property to the north (currently Willow Run RPUD) is rezoned to provide for no adjacent buffer, as depicted on Exhibit C-2, attached hereto. Deviation #19 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.C.2, which permits a maximum fence/wall height of 6 feet in residential zoning districts, to instead allow for a decorative wall with maximum height of 14 feet in the location shown on Exhibit C-2, attached hereto. Hacienda Lakes MPUD PL20210001791 Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 4 Packet Pg. 426 3.D.d Approved by HEX Decision 2014-18 ATTACHMENT E-1 ESPLANADE AT HACIENDA LAKES PROJECT LOCATION MAP PDI-PL2014-0000973 Exhibit B Page 3 of 4 ■ Packet Pg. 427 3.D.d a� Y J Approved by HEX Decision 2014-18 ATTACHMENT E-2 f: ESPLANADE AT HACIENDA LAKES ENTRY SIGN LOCATION MAP PDI-PL2014-O000973 ENTRY IGN Sa _ ---- --- ._.. RATTLESNAKE � RATTlf -�µM^ HAMMOCK RD'��~ :1� M to r 04 LO ............ ...+`� • 1..... .. '2 04 ......... ............. Exhibit B --Page, 4 of 4 Packet Pg. 428 3.D.d Approved by HEX Decision 2016-20 Exhibit "1" - Page 0 OT / .mF+wi�ww.swa.i Deno ► iO 1:137NS �P'�ICarBSYt030Ri13"lld W l09U levels VIP= 'm Sue • LAM ZWWWD vmu Golu S2IMi ONO 1101 I I 9N1U N19N3 ZIOd ag"J"d i I 4 I N0IiVA3-M T NV1d N0IS AULN3 AVVMd f 30 1 I33HS 'E-3116IMS-S Y'll VQN310VH 1V 3111f1ZV S1N3WWOO A.LNnOO ONV 1N'lM3lDd 43SI1131i + BMPE SiT13WW0 AINnooQNV LN3no Had 0361A3H BNll2 gin L2l « 03111WSns-0OA3H S A' � w ,N p E:la � 1 W r v6 d ► � x Ct � � w c� I c`n+r' C z i a w Fr a s's 6tn 7. a� 0Mp•u01S-esng-KO LOg kZ-old )iA unO111g14Q u0114-0 u01S tilu3 L03.00 9 (—a mi — saxel epuepeW 00-9L v Packet Pg. 429 .a. . _ IDA Approved by HEX Decision 2016-20 Exhibit "l" Page 6 of 7 J R C R 2 d M O O r O O M N O N J d LO T" Co O N EXHIBIT E-3, SHEET 2 OF 3 AZURE AT HACIENDA LAKES EXHIBIT LOCATION MAP SECTION: TOWNSHIP. RANGE: ^°"°"�"'G`n°'"°^""'^^°""�" ENGINEERING PREPARED FOR: 14,23,24 50S 26E °M16EN0 W% 0 I KM-0I V$F*M "OW TOLL BROTHERS. AMERICASCOLLIER COUNTY, LUXURY FLORDA uioowwAwwn FL34wneaee FILENAME: 5T801E050I.dwg q� ��ysµu&76" SHFE F: 3 OF 4 Packet Pg. 430 3.D.d Approved by HEX Decision 2016-20 Exhibit "1" y7 of 7 III Z M QLLJ� o rn O F Y aaW J x a C PQ 82 98 d Y }~ � W h- Z�`� 2XX W z M LL 'Z^ V O a(n� r\ RUN' i iy ry ..... y �y y �� ty�,yKyt�ryry�"� �! R� R� . iR� . , a M 0 CO 0 0 M N O N J a 0 "V WMA oLWATA e.rtota�aoha�wa w+.o�wPe7 uo_ot uqy mroo'c4*A� I.ae wi -wn.o■o•.D aov�v.r Packet Pg. 431 3.D.d n fr I BOUNDARY MARKER (32 SF) FUTURE DEVELOPMENT ENTRY SIGN p ¢ ENTRY SIGN (64 SF) I v 1 DEVELOPMENT FUTURE t, i I MARKER _ _ SF) -PROPERTY BOUNDARY, TYPICAL n UREJ V E2, AMENITY CENTER� U 4 UJtE G � I—E 1 iArcE 0 ROAD CONECTION EXHIBIT E-4, HACIENDA LAKES - NORTH AREA SIGN DEVIATION EXHIBIT, SHEET I OF 2 ACCESS EASEMENT PROPOSED DEAD-END STREET (MAX. 150') a� Y J cC C N cC 2 a M 0 O O M N 0 N J Lo O N Packet Pg. 432 3.D.d ACCENT - WA LL OR PLANTER 10• EXHIBIT 38' ACCENT WALL (lr.Wo./doNEl 2Y TOTAL SIGN AREA S/ SF .._M �___.�___.__.._........ ((22) $ECECONOMYNNAE.1]SF) HACIENDA, NORTH I I NORTH__ J L------- - — — _ I SECONDARY NAME I 12' ' 9ECONDMY NAME L-- - - - - - - ---J 12' j—� SIGN ACCENT WALL SION AREA 32 SF r-----------i IHACIENDAl- WALL OR i NORTH PLANTER 12' 15' 3NDA LAKES - NORTH AREA SIGN DEVIATION EXHIBIT, SHEET 2 m Y R J R C R 2 M O r 0 0 M N 0 N J ui r 0 rn Packet Pg. 433 3.D.d EXHIBIT F LIST OF OWNER COMMITMENTS For the purposes of this PUD, the owner commitments set forth below are applicable to Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC, its successors, and/or assigns. The owner commitments below shall not be enforceable upon Swamp Buggy Days, Inc., nor Collier County Junior Deputies League, Inc. LEGAL A. Access to Parcel "A", as described in Exhibit D of this document and is not a part of this MPUD shall be accessible via a new roadway easement from Owner that shall be recorded in the public records of Collier County, and shall run in a north -south direction from the existing thirty-foot roadway easement recorded in O.R. Book 857, Page 1800. This easement shall be recorded within 90-days of approval of this PUD. B. Access to Parcel "B", as described in Exhibit D of this document and is not a part of this MPUD shall be accessible via the existing roadway and ingress/egress easements recorded in O.R. Book 271, Page 505, O.R. Book 622, Page 1609, O.R. Book 245, Page 124, and O.R. Book 287, Page 18. C. No existing public access/roadway easements shall be vacated to preclude access to off -site private and public lands without providing replacement access easements. This new roadway easement shall be equivalent to the existing easement and shall be recorded concurrently with the vacation. 11 ENVIRONMENTAL A. Native vegetation shall be preserved in this MPUD in accordance with the table below: Hacienda Lakes Native Preserve Summary Description I Total Urban (ac) I Rural (ac) Protect Area 1 2262.14 625.07 1 1637.07 i I I I I On -Site Native Vegetation 1 1721.97 295.38 1 1426.59 1 Less the Native Veg Within Rattlesnake Hammock Ext. 1 2.02 2.02 1 0.00 I Less the Native Veq Within The Lords Wav Ext. 1 0.42 0.42 i 0.00 1 Less the Native Veg Within the Benfield Road Corridor 1 12.91 5.01 I 7.90 I Less the Native Veg Within Archaeological Preserves 1 6.07 1.06 I 5.02 I Native Vegetation For Requirement Calculations 1 1700.54 286.87 1 1413.67 f Percentage for required Native Preserve - 25% I I I I Required Native Vegetation' 1 <921.09 1 71.71 1 <849.38 Preserved Native Vegetation "" 1395.35 40.81 1352.57 I Compensating Native Preserve 2x URF Deficit)- 61.80 Total Preserve Area 1544.14 53.06 1491.08 Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 BCC Approved 10/25/1 1 Page 53 of 75 Packet Pg. 434 3.D.d " Native Preserve Requirement (LDC Subsection 2.05.02.B.2.g.ii.) of 90% within the RFMUD Sending Lands exceeds 60% of the total project RFMUD Sending Lands. Therefore, over 60% of the total project RFMUD Sending Lands shall be the required Rural native vegetation area. " Compliance with LDC Subsection 3.05.07 H.1.a., requires native vegetation planting enhancement of a minimum of 12.24 acres of the project's URF Subdistrict Preserve Tract. Compliance with 100% of the native vegetation preservation requirement shall be achieved through preserving RFMUD project native vegetation in an amount two times the deficient native vegetation preserve acreage in the URF Subdistrict project lands as is provided for through the adopted GMP amendment. B. A Wetland Mitigation/Monitoring plan is to be submitted once approved from SFWMD, for County review. C. The MPUD shall be developed in accordance with the Wildlife Habitat Management Plan accepted by Collier County as contained in the Environmental Impact Statement. D. An updated listed species survey for the future development areas shall be submitted prior to the next development order approval. E. Installation of the Sabal Palm Road culvert crossings and spreader swales shall occur prior to the first preliminary acceptance. III ENGINEERING A. A SFWMD ROW permit will be required for widening the bridge at Rattlesnake Hammock/951 over the Henderson Creek Canal. IV ARCHAEOLOGICAL and HISTORIC RESOURCES A. The five archaeological sites identified within the Hacienda Lakes parcel are denoted AP, Archaeological Preserve on Sheets 3 -12 in the MPUD Master Plan Set. These sites must remain undeveloped. A public access easement around the archaeological sites for potential digs and further study has been provided. Disturbance to these five protected archaeological sites may only occur with County approval and approval of the State Division of Historical Resources, and any disturbance shall only be permitted under the direct supervision of a qualified archaeologist. B. Historical/archeological areas are not used to meet preserve requirements because if an archaeological dig is required, then native vegetation would have to be removed. V EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES A. In order to mitigate for the project impacts and demand on Emergency Medical Services (EMS), the developer shall provide a one acre parcel to Collier County. This public facility site is identified as "PF" on the MPUD Master Plan (Exhibit Q. The dedication of the one acre site shall be by deed to Collier County and is subject to an Emergency Medical Services Impact Fee credit based on the fair market value of the donated property. The valuation of the one acre site dedication has been determined to be $30,000 per acre, for the purposes of the Emergency Medical Services Impact Fee credit, and the conveyance shall occur no later than at the time the 5001h residential unit is included in a development order request (site development plan, or plat), subsequent to the adoption of the DRI Development Order. If Owner conveys to County mitigated land for the real property conveyances described in this paragraph, then Owner shall be entitled to an EMS impact fee credit for the value of the Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 54 of 75 Packet Pg. 435 3.D.d mitigation, as a cost of construction for public facilities. The value of the mitigation shall be a per acre value calculated at the total cost of state and federal mitigation of the environmental impacts including wetland and wildlife impacts divided by the impacted acreage of 718 acres. Developer shall provide documentation acceptable to the County to verify this cost. The total cost of State and Federal mitigation includes land costs for onsite preserves used for mitigation, environmental permitting costs, exotic removal, enhancement of preservation lands, creation of wildlife habitat, hydrological improvements and any mitigation activity required in the Army Corps of Engineers permit and South Florida Water Management District permit for the project in order to address the project's mitigation. State and Federal mitigation does not include County required mitigation. In lieu of EMS impact fee credits for environmental mitigation, the County reserves the right to transfer to Developer or Owner County -owned State or Federal panther and wetlands credits equal to the value of the EMS impact fee credits calculated pursuant to this paragraph. VI TRANSPORTATION For the purposes of the following commitments, it must be understood that the property was divided into three main areas: North area being north of The Lord's Way extension; South area being south of Rattlesnake Hammock Road plus School; Benfield Road Improvements. The South area commitments shall be constructed in a sequential manner. However, the rest of the commitments are not sequential and can be accomplished in no specific order. Similarly, the three areas identified above are not required to be developed in a sequential manner. SOUTH AREA The Owner shall construct (here forward to mean "constructed to meet minimum County requirements for acceptance"), at its sole expense without road impact fee credits, the initial two lanes (south side) of Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension from C.R.951 to Florida Power Line Easement (approximately 0.25 miles). In addition, the Owner shall construct the Collier Boulevard/Rattlesnake Hammock Road intersection interim geometry as shown in Figure 1, below and to improve the bridge on Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension over the canal to the interim geometry as shown in Figure 1, below. Upon completion (here forward to mean "completed construction to County minimum requirements, and reserved for future conveyance to the County at the County's request.") of all of such improvements, the Owner shall be allowed to develop up to 327,500 square feet of Retail Land Uses, or Residential Pod A, or some combination of the two land uses. However, the total number of gross trips to be generated by this portion of development shall not exceed 1,409 PM peak hour trips. In the event that Residential Pod A is developed, access to Pod A will be either an internal private roadway or via an extension of Rattlesnake Hammock Road to the entrance of Pod A. These improvements and the areas allowed to develop upon completion of these improvements are depicted in Figure 1, below. All of these improvements are site related improvements. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 55 of 75 Packet Pg. 436 3.D.d If. The Owner shall construct, at its own expense and without road impact fee credits, Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension from Florida Power Line Easement to the road leading into Swamp Buggy grounds (approximately 0.25 miles) and improve the bridge on Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension over the canal to the final geometry as shown is Figure 2, below. These improvements are site related improvements. Upon completion of such improvement, -the Owner -shall -be allowed-- -develop—the--following additional land uses: 20,000 Square Feet of General Office, and; 50,000 Square Feet of Medical Office, and; 135 Room Hotel, and; Remaining portion of the 327,500 Square Feet of Retail (if applicable pursuant to Commitment 1), and; Remaining portion of Residential Pod A (if applicable pursuant to Commitment 1), and; Required residential uses within Activity Center land use; Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/1 1 Page 56 of 75 Packet Pg. 437 3.D.d These improvements and the area allowed to develop upon completion of these improvements are depicted in Figure 2, below. Figure 2 — Nad&Wa Lakes DMI • CommMment II llt�N Existing Un*Vrurn Lanes t Lanes/Twn Lanes to be Constructed/Reconstructed ■ •� Roadway Segment Previously Constructed Roadway Segment to be Constructed Area Previously Developed — ❑ Area to be Developed 7p Potential Area to be Developed m 1 Rattkesnay Hammock R ettsl _ Retlkkntlsl t Pod A � s i Florida Power line Easement III. The Owner shall construct, at its sole expense, Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension from the road leading into Swamp Buggy grounds to the future Benfield Road as a two lane road, including construction of the Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension at Benfield Road intersection. Upon completion of such improvement, the Owner shall be allowed to develop the following additional land uses; 919 Student Elementary School, and; Residential Pod B. Since only a portion of the capacity to be provided by this two lane section will be consumed by the Hacienda Lakes PUD, the Owner shall receive road impact fee credits equal to 50% of the cost of this improvement. The cost of this improvement will be determined at the time Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/ 11 Page 57 of75 Packet Pg. 438 3.D.d of construction, and shall include the fair market value of the land or easement when the Owner conveys the road right of way to the County, free and clear of liens and encumbrances. Fair market value has been determined to be $30,000 per acre. This improvement and the area allowed to develop upon completion of this improvement are depicted in Figure 3, below. Fifty percent (50%) of the cost of this improvement is deemed a site -related improvement. 3—kwun" litee GMI-Canmllmem MI :r.,lrurn~ hp 4qCanrt. xie�eesa+N+wn►a i ^^• ��v++n:+Imlnia.srra+MY6w„r..,�.n gas7rrl Kaman WCK [mMKied Ar%m PawM' 4rftknmd nA.r.14tX NVV� ,d NORTH AREA IV. With no improvement other than a bridge to be constructed by the Owner, at its sole cost and without road impact fee credit, over the water canal that runs parallel to C.R.951 at the northern project site access, the Owner shall be allowed to develop Residential Pod C (not to exceed 300 PM peak hour trips at the connection to C.R.951. Upon the commitment of construction of Benfield [now known as Hacienda Blvdl for connectivity in the north area. this restriction shall no longer be in effect). This improvement and the area allowed to develop upon completion of this improvement are depicted in Figure 4, below. At no time will the County accept ownership of this bridge. This improvement is a site related improvement. Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words s*riek tht! ttg-, are deleted; PL20230016103 Words underlined are added Last Revised: March 21, 2024 Page 5 Packet Pg. 439 3.D.d V. The Owner shall, at its sole expense and without road impact fee credits, complete the reconstruction of The Lord's Way from C.R.951 to Florida Power Line Easement and construct the extension of The Lord's Way from Florida Power Line Easement to the west entrance to the Business Park with a two lane undivided cross section. In addition, when the Collier Boulevard at The Lord's Way intersection is signalized upon meeting warrants, the cost of the signalization of this intersection will be shared proportionately among the Owner and other developments located in the area (east and west of C.R.951) and at no cost to Collier County and without road impact fee credits. These improvements are site -related improvements. Upon completion of such road improvement, the Owner shall be allowed to develop the following additional land uses: Business Park, and; Residential Pod D. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/1 1 Page 59 of75 Packet Pg. 440 3.D.d These improvements and the area allowed to develop upon completion of these improvements are depicted in Figure 5, below. Figure S - Hadenda lakes DRI - Commitment V Florida Power line Easement Residential ►od C �� i } i Residential S° Pod 0 Thttord's Wa Rattlesnake mock R Residential Residential Pod B 1 n Pod A is�inQ aG I I -,:A \ {� Existing Lanes/Turn Lanes Laneoum lanes to be Constructed/Reconstructed Roadway Segment Previously Constructed Roadway Segment to be Constructed _ Area Previously Developed Area to be Developed a When the DR] has received certificates of occupancy for 66 percent of the total commercial and residential development authorized by the DR], Collier County will perform an evaluation and inform the Owner if it is necessary to convey road right of way to the County for the section of The Lord's Way Extension from the west entrance to the Business Park/School to Benfield Road. If Collier County requests the road right of way, the Owner shall convey by road easement to the County the needed road right of way up to a width of 60 feet, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances, and shall receive impact fee credits equal to 100 percent of the fair market value of the road easement conveyed to the County which has been determined to be $30,000 per acre. No further certificates of occupancy shall be issued until the road easement conveyance is recorded in the public records of Collier County. If this segment of The Lord's Way is not deemed necessary (through documentation, or lack thereof, in the LRTP or the CIE) by the time the development achieves 66 percent of the total approved development quantities, this commitment shall be considered_expired—..__.-- Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 Approved CCPC Consent - Rev. 09/15/11 Page 60 of 75 Packet Pg. 441 3.D.d BENFIELD ROAD IMPROVEMENTS VI. The Owner shall construct, at its sole expense Benfield Road from Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension to the entrance of Residential Pod E with a two lane undivided cross section and reserve the right of way necessary for the final 4 lane divided cross section. Residential Pod E shall be connected in a consistent manner with the County's right of way reservation plans or construction plans for future Benfield Road sections. Upon completion of such improvement and acceptance by Collier County of the improvements, the Owner shall convey to the County a road easement for the road right of way needed for this section of Benfield Road up to a width of 120 feet, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances. Upon recordation of the road easement in the public records of Collier County, the Owner shall receive road impact fee credits for 50% of the fair market value of the road easement necessary for this section of Benfield Road and for 100% of the increase in cost resulting from the construction of the road according to County Standards (arterial) instead of as a local subdivision road. The fair market value of 50% of the conveyance of the road right of way easement to the County has been determined to be $30,000 per acre. Fifty percent (50%) of the fair market value of the road right of way easement and the total cost of the improvements are site -related improvements. The Cost of this improvement will be determined at the time of construction. Upon completion of such improvement, the Owner shall be allowed to develop the following additional land uses: Residential Pod E. These improvements and the area allowed to develop upon completion of this improvement are depicted in Figure 6, below. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 61 of 75 Packet Pg. 442 3.D.d Florida Para Line Easement Resld@ntW i Pad C — Pod 0 Resider" Pod E RattlewmW Hammock \ Retsidaxsel ResrdertlHl Pod d +' Pod A {P Ewstarte LWWOwn Lines LLinn ro be Canuructed/rteconsrructed — Roadway Srenrrn Prrvr * ConWW%rd — NoadwaV Seynent to be Cw Irucled --- Area PratiroLAh 4r.*ngd 4ea to Dr Dr-Ap,d VII. Benfield Road South of Rattlesnake Hammock Extension and north of Residential Pod E connection to Benfield Road: the Owner will convey right of way to Collier County by road easement for Benfield Road on areas not to be built by Owner up to a width of 120 feet, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances. Upon such conveyance, Collier County will provide road impact fees credits for 100% of the fair market value of the road easement. The value of the right of way has been determined to be $30,000 per acre. The area to be conveyed is depicted in Figure 7, below, Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/1 1 Page 62 of 75 Packet Pg. 443 3.D.d r Florida Power Line Easement RetldrRtiM I "- -` �� Pod CWC Resdential "' - — Pod D . _F .. Residential Pod E Ratdesnabr J..1 % 4 T Re9derfial Pod e Pod A �eaor '. ---- y Ecntrlt LAm-,Murn Lanes L La trOum Lars to be Ctmtnxted/Reconstructed Roadway Hyment Rrevtovsq Constructed ROM of Way to be ►r.sa.ved Area fhevw14 or rdowd Mea to be OevwMwd V1II. Benfield Road South of Sabal Palm Road: the Owner shall convey by road easement to the County the right of way needed for the future construction of Benfield Road south of Sabal Palm Road (approximately 1.00 mile) up to a width of 120 feet free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and at no expense to the County. In addition, the Owner shall receive no impact fee credits for such right of way conveyance. This is a site -related improvement. The area to be dedicated is depicted in Figure 8, below. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/1 1 Page 63 of 75 Packet Pg. 444 3.D.d IX. As a part of its State and Federal permits, the Owner shall pay for mitigation required for State and or Federal environmental impacts arising from the permitting for portions of Benfield Road described in Commitments VI and VII. In addition to this commitment, the Owner shall at no cost to County either: (1) Convey drainage easement(s) to the County for their stormwater management facility needs free and clear of all liens and encumbrances, or (2) agree to accept stormwater from Benfield Road into the Project's stormwater management system. These are site -related contributions. X. At two thresholds during construction of this DRI, the Owner shall provide to Collier County a transportation analysis which compares the value of the Owner's contribution to the County's public road network against the DRI's proportionate share, (as defined in the State of Florida's HB 7207) of which this DRI impacts County and State road segments. If Owner's contribution is less than its impact based on the transportation analysis, then Owner shall pay to County the difference in three installments starting 90 days after the transportation analysis is agreed to by both parties, and then each 90 days thereafter until paid in full. The transportation contribution by the Developer shall be defined as the sum of all road impact fees paid to date, the costs of the non site -related transportation Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 Approved CCPC Consent - Rev. 09/15/11 Page 64 of 75 Packet Pg. 445 3.D.d improvements (those receiving road impact fee credits) on Rattlesnake Hammock Road, Benfield Road and the Lords Way, plus the value of any road right-of-way conveyance by donation to the County unless otherwise calculated as an impact fee credit. The first transportation analysis shall be submitted to the County when 33% of approved development trips (1,109 total gross trips) have been permitted based on building permit issuance, without projecting forward growth. The second transportation analysis will be submitted when 66% of the approved development trips (2,219 total gross trips) have been permitted based on building permit issuance, with a projection toward build out. The second analysis and reconciliation will finalize any transportation related assessments owed by the Developer for the build out of the Project. With the annual PUD monitoring report, Developer shall provide an annual trip generation analysis of trips approved by Site Development Plan approval and building permit issuance compared to total trips approved within the DRI. Upon triggering 33% or 66% as described above, Developer shall submit the transportation analysis described in this paragraph within six months. No certificates of occupancy shall be issued until the traffic analysis and annual trip generation analysis required by this paragraph and any payments due have been delivered to County, unless the BCC grants an extension. X1. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the first 75,000 square feet of retail land uses, the Owner shall construct, at its sole expense, a Collier Area Transit (CAT) stop/shelter fronting the Commercial Tract C that shall include a 10'x 20' pavilion shelter with benches and protection from the elements, and include a minimum of three (3) bike racks. Owner shall be responsible for maintenance of the bus stop/shelter unless Owner elects to convey to County at no cost to County an easement for the bus shelter. The location of the CAT shelter is generally depicted below on the Master Mobility Plan. This is a site -related contribution. X11. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the first 70,000 square feet of business park land uses, or prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for a school or educational facility in the Business Park Tract, the Owner shall construct, at its sole expense, a Collier Area Transit (CAT) stop/shelter fronting the Business Park Tract BP that shall include a 10'x 20' pavilion shelter with benches and protection from the elements, and include a minimum of three (3) bike racks. Owner shall be responsible for maintenance of the bus stop/shelter unless Owner elects to convey to County at no cost to County an easement for the bus shelter, The location of the CAT shelter is generally depicted below on the Master Mobility Plan. This is a site -related contribution. X111. DRI traffic studies identified an off -site impact at the interchange of 1-75 and S.R. 951 Ramps Intersection, specifically in the left -turn movement serving the northbound S.R. 951 to westbound (northbound) I-75 turning movement. Assessments of this operation in 2011 indicate that changes to lane usage and signage could augment the acceptable operation of the intersection and delay the impacts of the DRI. Hacienda Lakes traffic becomes significant (exceeds five percent of service volume) at this location at 46.2 percent of site traffic generation. When the first transportation analysis required under subsection X above is undertaken (e.g. at 33 percent of site traffic generation), the existing traffic flow and level of service at this location will be reviewed and projected to the build -out of the DRI. If the 2011 operational assessment is confirmed and the intersection is, or will be, operating at an unacceptable level of service as determined by County or FDOT, then the Developer will identify a solution to offset its impacts and/or restore acceptable operating conditions, and contribute its proportionate share, per subsection X above, of the cost of the improvement to the appropriate government agency. If a proportionate share payment is identified as needed, the owner shall receive road impact fee credits for 100 percent of this contribution. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 65 of 75 Packet Pg. 446 3.D.d XIV. If Owner conveys to County mitigated land for the real property conveyances that are eligible for impact fee credits described in Subsections III, V, VI and VII of this Article VI, Transportation, then Owner shall be entitled to a transportation impact fee credit for the value of the State and Federal environmental mitigation, as a cost of construction for public facilities. The value of the mitigation shall be a per acre value calculated at the total cost of state and federal mitigation of the environmental impacts including wetland and wildlife impacts divided by the impacted acreage of 718 acres. The total cost of State and Federal mitigation includes land costs for onsite preserves used for mitigation, environmental permitting costs, exotic removal, enhancement of preservation lands, creation of wildlife habitat, hydrological improvements and any mitigation activity required in the Army Corps of Engineers permit and South Florida Water Management District permit for the project in order to address the project's mitigation. State and Federal mitigation does not include County required mitigation. Developer shall provide documentation acceptable to the County to verify this cost. In lieu of transportation impact fee credits for environmental mitigation, the County reserves the right to transfer to Developer or Owner County -owned State or Federal panther and wetlands credits equal to the value of the transportation impact fee credits calculated pursuant to this Subsection XIV. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 BCC Approved 10/25/1 1 Page 66 of 75 Packet Pg. 447 3.D.d 1 1 1 Legend Land Use CAT STOPISHELTER _ Athol Tract --- Proposed CAT Route 4A 1. 4B Exlension rrri Business Park or Schell — Exislinu CAT Route 4A & 40 Commercial �i Existing CA7 Facility 4A r♦ Pnr—Trecl Exisling CAT Facility 4B Prlbllc Fncil'iaos Tract (EMS) — Existing CAT Rama 7 Junior Deputy Proposed Pedastnan F—hhos r♦ Schnnl -- Existing Shared Use Path Residential Tract Project Boundary - Residential I Medical Use Dnwopirent Boundary Public ROW Reservation W 1 J EXISTING CAT 1 ROUTE 7 (TO MARCO ISLAND) I Pademrlan Facllltias WIII reposed I 11, Extended Along All Access I I Inlari l Roads Evan If Not Shown I I I Prornr�u Accrc, 1 �^ DEVELOPER 1 PROPOSED CAT 1 STOPISHELTER 1 HACIENDA LAKES PKWY r POTENTIAL 1 CAT STOPISHELTER 1 PROPOSED 1 4A & 4B CAT 1 ROUTE EXTENSION 1 DEVELOPER Proposed PROPOSED Access CAT STOPISHELTER RATTLESNAKE 1 PROP. RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK R _ HAMMOCK RD. EXL 1 EXISTING r CAT ROUTE 4A won EXISTING EXISTIN EXISTING CAT CAT CAT FACILITY FACILITY ROUTE 4A 4A (TYP) 4B (TYP) &4B-, WD Hacienda Lakes dFaat Master Mobility Plan n (REVISED 11112f2l JW� N Hacienda Lakes MPUD PL20210001791 Last Revised: January 28, 2022 POTENTIAL CAT STOPISHELTER Petloslrldyt�Fncll"r WIII Bo Exten''yyLLCC��M{a Along All Internal Reads on t1 Not Shown STATE LANDS LAAl A" �t� orw�s.r e, awe r4x: rwrq.misdeene oleatlam_ 1 WwkYiaFsl WPMrA7iTraexY�.mrd Page 67 of 75 Packet Pg. 448 3.D.d VII PUBLIC UTILITIES A. Per the current 2008 Water and Sewer Master Plan Update, the majority area of this project is located within the Collier County Water -Sewer District Boundary; there are some areas of this project that currently are outside of the Collier County Water & Sewer District Boundary. The areas that are not part of Collier County Water -Sewer District also do not belong to any other Water -Sewer District. Since Public Utilities can provide service as requested by this project, Impact Fees will be applied to the entire area to be developed. B. The project shall connect to the CCWSD potable water system at a location to be determined by the CCWSD when capacity is available. C. The project shall connect to the CCWSD wastewater collection and conveyance system at a location determined by CCWSD, when capacity is available. D. This future development is located on the zone of the existing South Hawthorn Wellfield for the wellfield-SCRWTP expansion to 20 MGD. The Rules and Regulations for protection of well fields shall be followed. All well sites and pipeline easements located on and close to this development needs to be shown on all future site development plans, PPL or any other site plans applications. VIII PLANNING A. Prior to the issuance of the first residential Development Order in the Hacienda Lakes MPUD, the Base TDR Credits and Early Entry TDR Bonus Credits shall be severed and redeemed from all Sending Lands to be preserved within one mile of the Urban Residential Fringe and the filing of executed Limitation of Development Rights Agreement(s) shall occur for these same lands. B. A permanent conservation mechanism, including Limitation of Development Rights Agreement(s), [shall] be attached/applied to all Sending Lands to be preserved beyond one mile of the Urban Residential Fringe prior to final approval of the first Site Development Plan (SDP) for the Hacienda Lakes project. IX SWAMP BUGGY DAYS RECREATION AND SPORTS PARK PUD GENERAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS The following commitments shall only apply to the Attraction and Junior Deputy Tracts: General Provisions A. All motor racing shall normally be limited to weekends and holidays. No motor racing or practice will commence earlier than 9:00 a.m. and all racing shall be completed no later than 1 1:00 P.M. B. The shooting and archery ranges shall meet accepted design standards regarding safety and shall be operated and maintained in accordance with accepted safe practices. For security and safety, access to the shooting and archery range areas shall be limited by fencing or other suitable barriers. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 BCC Approved 10125111 Page 68 of 75 Packet Pg. 449 3.D.d C. Fencing and/or other suitable barriers will be provided on the site by the Owner for security, safety, and traffic control. Roadways and Traffic A. Roadways within the subject property shall be private roadways and shall be maintained by the Owner. Therefore, said roadways shall be constructed and surfaced in accordance with accepted practices and as permitted by the County Engineer. B. For special events such as the Swamp Buggy races, and as deemed necessary by the County Sheriff, the Owner will arrange for special traffic control at the intersection of the main entrance road with CR 951 and Rattlesnake Hammock Road. Utilities and Service Facilities A. The potable water supply source for the project shall be the County regional water system (now known as the Collier County Water Sewer District). B. Permanent sanitary facilities shall be provided for everyday use by administrative and other personnel. Treatment and disposal of wastewater from said facilities shall be by septic tank/drainfield, or as otherwise permitted by Florida Administrative Code and approved by the appropriate local and/or State regulatory agencies. C. Sanitary facilities for spectators and participants at scheduled events shall consist of portable toilets (provided by a licensed commercial service), or permanent restroom facilities, or both. Wastewater from any permanent facilities provided for spectator use shall be stored in a buried holding tank of suitable capacity and subsequently removed and disposed of offsite by a licensed commercial service; or as otherwise permitted by Florida Administrative Code and approved by the appropriate local and/or State regulatory agencies. D. Onsite water well or wells may be constructed (as permitted) for flooding of the Swamp Buggy track and other non -potable uses. X DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT A. One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD and DRI monitoring until close-out of the PUD and DRI, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD/DRI commitments until close-out of the PUD and DRI. At the time of this PUD approval, the Managing Entity is Hacienda Lakes of Naples LLC. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD and DRI by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 BCC Approved 10/25/1 1 Page 69 of 75 Packet Pg. 450 3.D.d Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD and DRI are closed -out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD and DRI commitments. CP110-CPS-01024\119 Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 70 of 75 Packet Pg. 451 3.D.d EXHIBIT HACIENDA LAKES PUD MASTER USE AND CONVERSION LIST FOR SDP / PLAT / BUILDING PERMITS APPROVED USES (including square footages) APPROVED RESIDENTIAL USES (SDP & PLAT & BUILDING PERMIT) TOTAL RESIDENTIAL MULTI -FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY MANDATED OR PROJECT DATE PERMIT # DISTRICT UNITS RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL NON -MANDATED TOTAL NOTE: IF BUILDING DUPLEX ON ONE LOT, ADD SECOND UNIT AT BUILDING PERMIT APPROVED COMMERCIAL USES IN GROSS FLOOR AREA (SDPs) TOTAL TOTAL PROJECT DATE PERMIT # DISTRICT RETAIL OFFICE TOTAL BP HOTEL TOTAL 1 of 5 Page 71 of 75 Packet Pg. 452 3.D.d APPROVED CONVERSIONS (SDPs & PLAT) FROM USE TO USE DATE PERMIT N (& QUANTITY) (& QUANTITY) FROM DISTRICT TO DISTRICT ATTACHMENTS: RESIDENTIAL WORKSHEET FOR EACH SDP /PLAT / BUILDING PERMIT COMMERCIAL WORKSHEET FOR EACH SDP 2 of 5 Page 72 of 75 Packet Pg. 453 3.D.d I,/:Ty1Die 117.11W.1►4*11a011 RESIDENTIAL WORKSHEET FOR EACH SDP/PLAT/BUILDING PERMIT TOTAL PROJECT RESIDENTIAL UNITS: 1,760 [UP TO 1,232 MAY BE MULTI -FAMILY] IUI:1\107:11$:K, UNITS BY GMP 17 IN C DISTRICT 13 IN R/MU FROM C 25 IN RMU 55 MANDATED RES UNITS NON -MANDATED UNITS: 1,705 UNITS [UP TO 1,232 MAY BE MULTI -FAMILY IN ENTIRE PUD] REDUCED BY: 1. CARETAKER'S RESIDENCES IN ENTIRE PUD 2. UNITS USED FOR CONVERSION TO SENIOR HOUSING [UP TO 112.50 RES UNITS FOR 450 SENIOR HOUSING UNITS IF DERIVED FROM RESIDENTIAL] 1 RES UNIT = 4 SENIOR HOUSING EXCEPT INDEPENDENT LIVING SINGLE FAMILY STYLE UNITS ARE 1 TO 1. AT SDP, DETERMINE WHICH MANDATED RES UNITS OR NON -MANDATED UNITS ARE MULTI -FAMILY AND WHICH ARE SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICTS THAT ALLOW RES: C DISTRICT: 17 RES UNITS (MANDATED) R DISTRICT: RMU DISTRICT: 38 UNITS (MANDATED) CONVERSIONS: TO SENIOR HOUSING: DEDUCT [UP TO 112.50 IF RES UNITS ARE DERIVED FROM RESIDENTIAL.] TOTAL: 1,760 Hacienda Lakes MPUD PL20210001791 Last Revised: January 28, 2022 Page 73 of 75 Packet Pg. 454 3.D.d HACIENDA LAKES PUD COMMERCIAL WORKSHEET FOR EACH SDP TOTAL PROJECT COMMERCIAL INTENSITY 327,500 RETAIL IN GROSS FLOOR AREA: 70,000 OFFICE 140,000 BP 92,000 HOTEL OF 135 ROOMS BP DISTRICT: (A) _ 140,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF BP USES; AND IF HOTEL BUILT HERE AND NOT IN C DISTRICT, ADD 92,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA FOR HOTEL UP TO 135 ROOMS (HOTEL CONVERSION DISAPPEARS) OR IF NO HOTEL IN BP & NO HOTEL IN C, ADD 60,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF BP USES (THIS IS HOTEL CONVERSION) ***************************************************** OR (B) PRIVATE OR PUBLIC SCHOOL UP TO 140,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA (EXCLUDES COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT PUBLIC SCHOOLS) ***************************************************** R/MU DISTRICT: UP TO 50,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF MEDICAL -RELATED USES [ALL USES ARE OFFICE USES EXCEPT FOR DRUG STORES AND PROPRIETORY STORES (GROUP 5912) WHICH IS RETAIL] [CHECK APPROVED RETAIL IN TRACT C — CAN'T GO OVER 327,500 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF RETAIL IN THE ENTIRE PUD] [CHECK OFFICE IN TRACT C — CAN'T GO OVER 70,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA IN ENTIRE PUD] ***************************************************** TRACT C: — 327,500 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF RETAIL; DEDUCT MEDICAL RETAIL APPROVED IN RMU 2. DEDUCT SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF SENIOR HOUSING NOT DERIVED FROM RESIDENTIAL UNITS [MAX 450 SENIOR HOUSING UNITS IN ENTIRE PUD] 4 of 5 Page 74 of 75 Packet Pg. 455 3.D.d 3. UP TO 81,875 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF RETAIL CAN BE CONVERTED TO OFFICE [= 25% OF TOTAL]; AND IF NO HOTEL IN BP & HOTEL CONVERSION NOT USED IN BP, ADD 92,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF HOTEL UP TO 135 ROOMS; AND 70,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF PROFESSIONAL AND GENERAL OFFICE USES DEDUCT UP TO 50,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF PROFESSIONAL AND GENERAL OFFICE IF APPROVED IN RMU DISTRICT CONVERSIONS IN TRACT C: UP TO 25% OF RETAIL CAN BE CONVERTED TO OFFICE [UP TO 81,875 SF] RETAIL TO OFFICE ON A ONE-TO-ONE BASIS [UP TO 81,875 SF] RETAIL TO SF SENIOR HOUSING ON A ONE-TO-ONE BASIS [MAY HAVE 450 SENIOR HOUSING UNITS IN ENTIRE PUD] ***************************************************** 5of5 Page 75 of 75 Packet Pg. 456 ORDINANCE 2022-18 3.D.d HACIENDA LAKES MPUD PDI-PL20230016103 Packet Pg. 457 3.D.d ORDINANCE NO. 2022- 18 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 11-41, THE HACIENDA LAKES MIXED USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, TO CHANGE THE BUSINESS PARK AND RESIDENTIAL TRACT LINES, REMOVE THE RV TRACT AND ADD ACCESS POINTS ALONG THE NORTHERN MPUD BOUNDARY; BY REVISING DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS; AND BY ADDING DEVIATIONS. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, CONSISTING OF 29262+/- ACRES IS LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF COLLIER BOULEVARD (C.R. 951) AT THE INTERSECTION OF COLLIER BOULEVARD AND RATTLESNAKE -HAMMOCK ROAD AND NORTH AND SOUTH OF SABAL PALM ROAD IN SECTIONS 11, 129 13, 14, 23, 24 AND 25, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, AND SECTIONS 19 AND 30, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PL20210001791] WHEREAS, on October 25, 2011, the Board of County Commissioners approved Ordinance No. 11-41, which created the Hacienda Lakes Mixed Use Planned Unit Development "(MPUD"); and WHEREAS, Alexis Crespo, AICP of RVI Planning + Landscape Architecture, Inc. and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. representing Toll FL XIII Limited Partnership, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to amend the MPUD. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: The MPUD Document attached as Exhibits "A" through "G" to Ordinance No. 11-41 is hereby amended in accordance with the revised PUD Document, attached hereto as Exhibits "A" through "G" and incorporated by reference herein. [21-CPS-02163/1715485/11152 Isles of Naples -Hacienda PUDA 1 of 2 4/22/22 Packet Pg. 458 3.D.d SECTION TWO: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super -majority vote of the Board of Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this a ay of / 6 i , 2022. ATTEST: CRYS TAI�;.oI1'E, CLERK By: f bgp Clerk Al es * to Clf� A Approved as to form and legality: H 'di Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney Attachments: Exhibit A — Permitted Uses Exhibit B — Development Standards County BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER CO DA 211A L. McDaniel, Jr., Chairman rsce fiied with th" This ordina ate,s QFfic© ti�a r t ry cf �' QA y of t :nt ONS and acknow, clay rece}�i�s � filing ived t Of , By o c Exhibit B-1— Esplanade at Hacienda Lakes Project Location Map [Hex 2015-06] Exhibit B-2— Azure at Hacienda Lakes Project Location Map [Hex 2016-20] Exhibit B-3— Hacienda Lakes North Area Project Location Map Exhibit C — Master Plan Exhibit C-1— R/MU Access to Rattlesnake Hammock Rd. and Southern Buffer Exhibit Project [Hex 2021-33] Exhibit C-2— Hacienda Lakes North Area -Enlargement of Master Plan Exhibit D — Legal Description Exhibit D-1— Hacienda Lakes of Naples Legal Description [Hex 2014-18 & 2015-06] Exhibit E — List of Requested Deviations Exhibit E-1— Esplanade at Hacienda Lakes Project Location Map [Hex 2014-18] Exhibit E-2— Esplanade at Hacienda Lakes Entry Sign Location Map [Hex 2014-18] Exhibit E-3— Azure at Hacienda Lakes Primary Entry Sign Plan and Elevation [Hex 2016-20] Exhibit E-4— Hacienda Lakes North Area Sign Deviation Exhibit Exhibit F — List of Owner Commitments includes Master Mobility Plan Exhibit G — Master Use and Conversion List [21-CPS-02163/1715485/11152 Isles of Naples -Hacienda PUDA 4/22/22 2 of 2 Packet Pg. 459 3.D.d II EXHIBIT A PERMITTED USES PROJECT LAND USE TRACTS TRACT TYPE UNITS. ACREAGE± TRACT "R" RESIDENTIAL 1,714 447.86 TRACT "R/MU" RESIDENTIAL/MEDICAL USE 25 min.* 38.82 TRACT "BP" BUSINESS PARK 1 35.38 TRACT "C" COMMERCIAL 17 min.* 34.16 TRACT "A" ATTRACTION 1 47.27 TRACT "P" PRESERVE 0 1,544.14 TRACT "PF" PUBLIC FACILITY 0 1.33 TRACT "JD" JUNIOR DEPUTY 2 21.62 TRACT "ROW" PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY 0 72.01 TRACT "S" SCHOOL 0 19.55 Total 1,760 2262.14 Denotes the minimum number of dwelling units that must be constructed in the associated land use tract. Given that Tract C may generate up to 55 residential dwelling units, thirty (30%) percent of those residential units (17 units) must be constructed in Tract C. Tract R/MU is required by this document to have no less than 25 residential dwelling units constructed within that Tract. The balance of the residential dwelling units generated from Tract C (13 units) must be constructed in either the R/MU Tract, or on a portion of Tract R, within one-third of one mile of the boundary of Tract C. GENERAL PERMITTED LAND USES Streets, alleys, water management facilities and structures, utilities and other infrastructure improvements are generally permitted anywhere within this MPUD except for in the P, Preserve Tract. TRACT "R", RESIDENTIAL PERMITTED USES: Up to 1,760 residential units consisting of single family units and multi -family units are permitted in the entire PUD. No more than 1,232 units in the entire PUD shall be multi -family, as defined in the LDC. Residential units may be converted to senior housing units ^r FeeFe tional ..oi ; 'e (RN„ eeits, where permitted, in accordance with the Land Use Conversion Factors in Exhibit B. Upon conversion, the residential units shall be reduced according to the Land Use Conversion Factors in Exhibit B. Developer and County shall each maintain a master list of converted uses for this PUD. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: Single family detached dwellings; 2. Zero lot line, detached dwellings; Two-family and duplex dwellings; Hacienda Lakes MPUD PL20210001791 Last Revised: April 21, 2022 Words str-uek thfough-are deleted; Words underlined are added Page 1 of 79 Packet Pg. 460 3.D.d 4. Single family attached dwellings, (including townhouses intended for fee simple conveyance including the platted lot associated with the residence); Multi -family dwellings; 6. Senior housing for persons over age 55, limited to independent living facilities, assisted living facilities, skilled nursing facilities, and continuing care retirement communities. Senior housing facilities shall not be considered residential land uses for the purposes of density, but shall be derived from conversion from residential units in accordance with the Land Use Conversion Factors in Exhibit B. These land uses shall be developed in accordance the development standards set forth in Table II of Exhibit B. In no instance shall greater than 450 senior housing units be developed in the entire MPUD; 7. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the BZA, by the process outlined in the LDC. B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: 1. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with principal uses permitted in this land use tract, including swimming pools, spas, docks, boat houses, and screen enclosures, recreational facilities designed to serve the development; 2. Model homes and model home centers including offices for project administration, construction, sales and marketing, apartment rental, as well as resale and rental of units within the MPUD in perpetuity (group 6531); 3. Recreational facilities and structures to serve the PUD, including clubhouses, health and fitness facilities, pools, meeting rooms, community buildings, boardwalks, playgrounds, playfields, tennis courts, and similar uses intended to exclusively serve the residents of the PUD and their guests; 4. Horse stables and related equestrian facilities to serve the PUD that complement the MPUD's proximity to the Picayune Strand State Forest may be allowed on residential lands lying east of the proposed north/south public roadway, subject to applicable permitting. This private, non-commercial, accessory use is intended for stabling for residents of the PUD. Horse racing, dressage, or horse jumping events open to the public are prohibited; 5. Private stables on single-family lots greater than 43,560 square feet in lot area, on residential lands lying east of the proposed north/south public roadway are permitted to allow one horse for each 21,780 square feet of lot area; 6. Horse trails. Hacienda Lakes MPUD PL20210001791 Last Revised: April 21, 2022 Words stfuek thr- ,ugh are deleted; Words underlined are added Page 2 of 79 Packet Pg. 461 3.D.d HI '-r-net "PIA -. _MIN.".. . .. . . . - z7. Aeaeessei=y e .. and sretu etistemaFily asseesimed with prineipal_, per-fflit4ed in this land use traet, ineluding swimming peels, spas, deeks, bem houses, alid seFeen ,.le .,r:., al f ilities designed to sen,e the de elopme„r• W III TRACT "R/MU", RESIDENTIAL/MEDICAL USE PERMITTED USES: Up to I,760 residential units consisting of single family units and multi -family units are permitted in the entire PUD. No more than 1,232 units in the entire PUD shall be multi -family as defined in the LDC. The residential units may be converted to senior housing units, where permitted, in accordance with the Land Use Conversion Factors in Exhibit B. Upon conversion, the residential units shall be reduced according to the Land Use Conversion Factors in Exhibit B. Up to 50,000 square feet of gross floor area of medical office related land uses are also allowed in this tract, less up to 50,000 square feet of gross floor area of medical related office land uses approved by plat or SDP in Tract C. Developer and County shall each maintain a master list of converted uses for this PUD. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or uses, or and used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: Single family detached dwellings; Zero lot line, detached dwellings; 3. Two-family and duplex dwellings; 4. Single family attached dwellings, (including townhouses intended for fee simple conveyance including the platted lot associated with the residence); 5. Multi -family dwellings; Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words stfuek rhfough-are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: April 21, 2022 Page 3 of 79 Packet Pg. 462 3.D.d IV 6. Senior housing for persons over age 55, limited to independent living facilities, assisted living facilities, skilled nursing facilities, and continuing care retirement communities. Senior housing facilities shall not be considered residential land uses for the purposes of density, but shall be derived from conversion from residential units in accordance with the Land Use Conversion Factors in Exhibit B. These land uses shall be developed in accordance the development standards set forth in Table II of Exhibit B In no instance shall greater than 450 senior housing units be developed in the entire MPUD. Drug Stores and Proprietary Stores (Group 5912). If this retail use is developed in the R/MU Tract then the square footage of gross floor area of this retail use shall reduce the square footage of gross floor area of retail uses permitted in Tract C.; Health Services, (Groups 8011-8049, 8071-8072, 8082, and 8092-8099); Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals ("BZA") by the process outlined in the LDC. B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with principal uses permitted in this land use tract, including swimming pools, spas, docks, boat houses, and screen enclosures, recreational facilities designed to serve the development; 2. Model homes and model home centers including offices for project administration, construction, sales and marketing; Recreational facilities and structures to serve the PUD including clubhouses, health and fitness facilities, pools, meeting rooms, community buildings, boardwalks, playgrounds, playfields, tennis courts, and similar uses intended to exclusively serve the residents of the PUD and their guests. TRACT "BP" BUSINESS PARK PERMITTED USES: Up to 140,000 square feet of gross floor area of business park land uses, and a hotel of up to 135 rooms capped at 92,000 square feet of gross floor area if a hotel is not developed in Tract C. However, if owner elects not to build a hotel on Tract C or BP, then the square footage limitation of business park land uses could be exceeded if a hotel conversion to business park of up to 60,000 square feet of gross floor area is used based on the land use conversions in Exhibit B. In place of the business park and hotel land uses, a school may be developed. If a hotel is constructed on Tract C or BP, based on an approved plat or SDP, then the hotel conversion shall terminate. Tract `BP" is located directly north of the Attraction Tract that accommodates the Swamp Buggy land uses and facilities. This acreage is meant to provide for a transition from the Attraction land uses to the Residential Tract and intended land uses further north. This Tract shall be permitted to be developed for either a business park or a school. If the Tract is developed as a school, only those uses permitted in Section XI shall be allowed. Should the 35.38 acre tract be proposed for development as a business park, no building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: Hacienda Lakes MPUD PL20210001791 Last Revised: April 21, 2022 Words str-ti k th, ettg1 are deleted; Words underlined are added Page 4 of 79 Packet Pg. 463 3.D.d A. Principal Uses: 1. Apparel and other finished products (groups 2311-2399); 2. Building construction (groups 1521-1542); 3. Business services (group 7311); 4. Communications (groups 4812-4899, including communication towers limited in height to 100 feet); 5. Construction: Special trade contractors (groups 1711-1799); 6. Depository and non -depository institutions (groups 6081, 6082); 7. Drugs and medicines (groups 2833-2836); 8. Eating places (group 5812, not including fast foods, walk-up windows and drive- thru restaurants); 9. Educational services (groups 8221-8299); 10. Electronics and other electrical equipment manufacturing, indoor only (groups 3612- 3699); 11. Engineering, accounting, research, management, and related services (groups 8711- 8748); 12. Food manufacturing (groups 2034, 2038, 2053, 2064, 2066, 2068, 2096, 2098, 2099); 13. Furniture and fixtures manufacturing (groups 2511-2599); 14. Government offices/buildings (groups 9111-9222, 9224-9229, 9311, 9411-9451, 9511-9532, 9611-9661 ); 15. Health services (groups 8011-8049); 16. Industrial and commercial machinery and computer equipment (groups 3524, 3546, 3571 - 3579); 17. Industrial inorganic chemicals (groups 2833, and 2844); 18. Job training and vocational rehabilitation services (group 8331); 19. Leather and leather products (groups 3131-3199); 20. Measuring, analyzing, and controlling instruments; photographic, medical and optical goods; watches and clocks manufacturing (groups 3812-3873); Hacienda Lakes MPUD PL20210001791 Last Revised: April 21, 2022 Words str-ue mare deleted; Words underlined are added Page 5 of 79 Packet Pg. 464 3.D.d 21. Medical laboratories and research and rehabilitative centers (groups 8071, 8072, 8092, 8093); 22. Miscellaneous manufacturing industries (groups 3911-3999); 23. Motion picture production (groups 7812-7819); 24. Motor freight transportation and warehousing (group 4225, mini- and self- storage warehousing only), subject to the following criteria: i. The use of metal roll -up garage doors located on the exterior of the perimeter buildings and walls of buildings which are visible from a public right-of-way is prohibited; and ii. Access to individual units whether direct or non -direct must be from the side of the building that is oriented internally; iii. No building shall exceed 100 feet in length when adjacent to a residential tract within the MPUD; iv. No outdoor storage of any kind is permitted, and v. Storage units shall be utilized for storage purposes only. 25. Printing, publishing and allied industries (groups 2711-2796); 26. Rubber and miscellaneous plastic products (groups 3021, 3052, 3053); 27. Security/commodity brokers (group 6211); 28. Transportation equipment (groups 3714, 3716, 3732, 3751, 3792, 3799); 29. U.S. Postal Service (group 4311); 30. Wholesale trade durable goods (groups 5021, 5031, 5043-5049, 5063-5078, 5091, 5092, 5094-5099); 31. Wholesale trade non durable goods (5111-5153, 5181, 5182, 5191, except that wholesale distribution of chemicals, fertilizers, insecticides, and pesticides shall be a minimum of 500 feet from a residential tract within or abutting the MPUD, 5192- 5193); 32. Any other use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals. B. Limited Principal Uses: The following uses shall be limited to a maximum of 30 percent of the total acreage of the Business Park tract: Business services (7312, 7313, 7319, 7331, 7334-7336, 7342, 7349, 7352, 7361, no labor pools, 7371-7384, 7389); 2. Child day care services (group 8351); Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words stftrsk thretigh-are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: April 21, 2022 Page 6 of 79 Packet Pg. 465 3.D.d Depository and non -depository institutions (groups 6021-6062, 6091, 6099, 6111- 6163); 4. Drug stores (group 5912, limited to drug stores and pharmacies) in conjunction with health service groups and medical laboratories/research/rehabilitative groups; Hotels (group 7011) up to 135 rooms, capped at 92,000 square feet of gross floor area if a hotel is not developed in Tract C. Hotel square footage does not reduce the business park square footage cap. If the hotel conversion is applied to Tract BP, then a hotel is not permitted; 6. Membership organizations (group 8611); business associations (group 8621); professional organizations (8631); labor unions and similar labor organizations; Personal services (groups 7215-7231, 7241); Physical fitness facilities and bowling centers (groups 7991, 7933); Professional offices; insurance agencies (group 6411); insurance carriers (groups 6311-6399); real estate (6531, 6541, 6552, 6553); holding and other investment offices (groups 6712-6799); attorneys (group 8111 ); 10. Travel agencies (group 4724). C. Uses Accessory to Principal and Limited Uses: Uses and structures that are accessory and incidental to uses permitted as of right; 2. One (1) caretaker's residence within Tract BP, Business Park Tract, subject to the following: i. The residence shall be constructed as an integral part of the principal structure and shall be entered from within the principal structure. Exits required to comply with fire code shall be permitted; ii. The caretaker's residence shall be an accessory use and shall be for the exclusive use of the property owner, tenant, or designated employee operating or maintaining the principal structure; iii. Off-street parking shall be as required for a single-family residence. 3. For primary business park uses, retail sales and/or display areas as accessory to the principal uses shall not exceed an area greater than 20 percent of the gross floor area of the permitted principal use and is further subject to retail standards for landscaping, parking and open space. V1E TRACT "C", COMMERCIAL PERMITTED USES: Up to 327,500 square feet of gross floor area of retail land uses and up to 70,000 square feet of gross floor area of professional and medical office uses reduced by medical -related retail use square footages approved by SDP in Tract R/MU and reduced by up to 50,000 square feet of gross floor area of professional and medical office land use square footages approved by plat or SDP in Tract R/MU. The 70,000 square feet of professional and medical office may be exceeded if the retail land uses are converted to office thereby reducing the retail square footage, not to exceed 25% of the Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words str-uek thfeugh are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: April 21, 2022 Page 7 of 79 Packet Pg. 466 3.D.d retail land use allocation. Additionally, a hotel of up to 135 rooms and up to 92,000 square feet of gross floor area shall be allowed in Tract C unless a hotel is developed within Tract BP or if the hotel use is converted to BP uses in Tract BP based on an approved plat or SDP. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: 1. Single family attached dwellings, (including townhouses intended for fee simple conveyance including the platted lot associated with the residence); 2. Multi -family dwellings; 3. Residential land uses integrated into commercial buildings with residential units located above commercial land uses to create a mixed -use building; 4. Accounting, auditing and bookkeeping services (group 8721); 5. Adjustment and collection services (group 7322); 6. Advertising agencies (group 7311); 7. Advertising- miscellaneous (group 7319); 8. Amusements and recreation services, indoor (groups 7911-7922, 7991, 7993, 7999, only billiard parlors, bingo parlors, martial arts and yoga instruction, bicycle and golf cart rentals); 9. Apparel and accessory stores with (groups 5611-5699); 10. Auto and home supply stores (groups 5211-5261, and 5531); 11. Automotive dealers, not elsewhere classified (group 5599); 12. Automobile parking (group 7521), including garages -automobile parking, parking structures, no towing yards; 13. Automotive repair, services and parking (groups 7513 - 7533, 7536-7549); 14. Barber shops (group 7241), except barber schools; 15. Beauty shops (7231), except beauty schools; 16. Boat dealers (5551); 17. Bookkeeping services (8721); 18. Bowling centers, indoor (7933); 19. Building construction - General contractors (groups 1521 - 1542); 20. Building materials, hardware and garden supplies (groups 5211-5261); Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words stfurak thre„gh-are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: April 21, 2022 Page 8 of 79 Packet Pg. 467 3.D.d 21. Business associations (group 8611); 22. Business consulting services (group 8748); 23. Business credit institutions (groups 6153-6159); 24. Business services (groups 7311-7353, 7359, except labor contractors, 7371-7379, 7381 except armored car and dog rental, 7382-7389 except auctioneering service, automobile recovery, automobile repossession, batik work, bottle exchanges, bronzing, cloth cutting, cosmetic kits, cotton inspection, cotton sampler, drive - away automobile, exhibits -building, filling pressure containers, field warehousing, fire extinguisher, floats -decoration, folding and refolding, gas systems, bottle labeling, liquidation services, metal slitting and shearing, packaging and labeling, patrol of electric transmission or gas lines, press clipping service, repossession service, rug binding, salvaging of damaged merchandise, scrap steel cutting and slitting, shrinking textiles, solvent recovery, sponging textiles, tape slitting, texture designers, textile folding, tobacco sheeting and window trimming service); 25. Cable and other pay television services (group 4841); 26. Senior housing for persons over age 55, limited to independent and assisted living facilities, continuing care retirement communities, and nursing homes. This housing is included in the retail square foot limitation and no greater than 450 senior housing units shall be developed in this entire MPUD; 27. Child day care services (8351); 28. Commercial printing (2752, excluding newspapers); 29. Civic, social and fraternal associations (group 8641); 30. Coin operated amusement devices, indoor (group 7993); 31. Communications (groups 4812-4841) including communications towers up to specified height, subject to LDC Section 5.05.09; 32. Construction - special trade contractors (groups 1711 - 1793, 1796, 1799); 33. Dance studios, schools and halls (group 7911); 34. Drug stores (group 5912); 35. Depository institutions (groups 6011-6099); 36. Eating and drinking establishments (group 5812, and group 5813) excluding bottle clubs. Outdoor amplified sound is prohibited; 37. Educational services (groups 8221, 8222, 8243 - 8249); Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words stfeek thfeughlare deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: April 21, 2022 Page 9 of 79 Packet Pg. 468 3.D.d 38. Engineering, accounting, research, management and related services (groups 8711- 8748); 39. Food stores (groups 5411-5499); 40. Gasoline service stations (group 5541 subject to LDC requirements); 41. General merchandise stores (groups 5311, 5331-5399); 42. Glass and glazing work (1793); 43. Health services (groups 8011-8049, 8051-8059, 8071-8072, 8082 and 8092-8099); 44. Home furniture, furnishing, and equipment (groups 5712-5736); 45. Hotels and motels (groups 7011, 7021, and 7041) only if a hotel is not built in Tract BP and the hotel conversion is not applied to Tract BP; 46. Insurance carriers, agents and brokers (groups 6311-6399, 6411); 47. Landscape architects, consulting and planning (group 0781); 48. Legal services (group 8111); 49. Libraries (group 8231); 50. Management and public relations services (groups 8741-8743, 8748); 51. Membership organizations (8611-8699); 52. Membership sports and recreation clubs, indoor (group 7997); 53. Miscellaneous personal services (7291, 7299, debt counseling only); 54. Miscellaneous repair services (groups 7622 - 7699); 55. Miscellaneous retail (groups 5912-5963, 5992-5999); 56. Motion picture theaters (group 7832); 57. Motorcycle dealers (group 5571); 58. Motor freight transportation and warehousing (group 4225 mini- and self -storage warehousing only); 59. Museums and art galleries (group 8412); 60. Non -depository credit institutions, and loan brokers (groups 6111-6163 ); 61. Offices for engineering, architectural, and surveying services (groups 0781, 8711- 8713); Hacienda Lakes MPUD PL20210001791 Last Revised: April 21, 2022 Words stfuek thr- ugh -are deleted; Words underlined are added Page 10 of 79 Packet Pg. 469 3.D.d 62. Paint, glass and wallpaper stores (5231); 63. Passenger car leasing (group 7515); 64. Passenger car rental (group 7514); Y 65. Personal services (groups 7211, 7212, 7215, 7216 nonindustrial dry cleaning only, R J 7217, 7219, 7221-7251, no beauty or barber schools, 7261 except crematories, c 7291, 7299, excluding massage parlors, escort services, steam baths, Turkish baths and tattoo parlors); f° x 66. Photographic studios (7221); o a 67. Physical fitness facilities (7991); c 68. Political organizations (group 8651); c M N 69. Printing, publishing, and allied industries (groups 2711, 2721); c N 70. Professional membership organizations (group 8621); J a- LO 71. Public Administration (groups 9111-9199, 9229, 9311, 9411-9451, 9511-9532, T" N 9611-9661); v 72. Public or private parks and playgrounds; 73. Public relations services (group 8743); 74. Radio, television, and consumer electronics stores (group 5731); 75. Radio and television broadcasting stations (groups 4832, and 4833); 76. Real estate (group 6512, 6531-6552); 77. Record and prerecorded tape stores (group 5735), excluding adult oriented rentals and sales; 78. Recreational vehicle dealers (group 5561); 79. Religious organizations (group 8661); 80. Research, development, and testing services (group 8731-8734); 81. Retail nurseries, lawn and garden supply stores (group 5261); 82. Security and commodity brokers, dealer, exchanges and services (groups 6211- 6289); 83. Theatrical producers and miscellaneous theatrical services, indoor (groups 7922- 7929); Hacienda Lakes MPUD PL20210001791 Last Revised: April 21, 2022 Words stftsk thr-eugh-are deleted; Words underlined are added Page 11 of 79 Packet Pg. 470 3.D.d 84. Tour operators (group 4725); 85. Travel agencies (group 4724); 86. United States Postal Service (4311 except major distribution center); 87. Veterinary services (groups 0742, 0752 excluding outside kenneling); 88. Videotape rental (7841), excluding adult oriented rental and sales; 89. Vocational schools (groups 8243-8299); 90. Any other commercial use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted uses and consistent with the purpose and intent statement of the district as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals. A. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: Parking facilities and signage; 2. Eating/ Picnic Area; 3. One (1) caretaker's residence within the C, Commercial Tract; Child care, outdoor play areas. Where play areas are constructed as an accessory use to a permitted use, the following conditions shall apply: a. A minimum five-foot, six-inch high reinforced fence shall be installed on all sides of the play area which are not open to the principal structure; b. Ingress to and egress from the play area shall be made only from the principal structure, however an emergency exit from the play area shall be provided which does not empty into the principal structure; C. The play equipment shall be set back a minimum distance of five feet from the required fence and from the principal structure. 5. Kiosks, that are small separate structures, often movable and open on one or more sides, used as a newsstand, vending stall, or other conveniences, Individual kiosks shall not to exceed 200 square feet.; VII TRACT "A" ATTRACTION PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words str-u k thr-ough-are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: April 21, 2022 Page 12 of 79 Packet Pg. 471 3.D.d A. Principal Uses: 1. "Swamp Buggy" race track (group 7948, swamp buggy track only); 2. County fair and similar expositions, including circuses, carnivals, and other recreation/entertainment activities; 3. Exhibition hall/community center; 4. Amateur soccer, softball, lacrosse, volleyball, football, and similar outdoor recreational sports and activities and shall not be limited in the number of occurrences; 5. Indoor target ranges, including archery; 6. Stock car, monster trucks, and motorized vehicle race track (group 7948, motorized vehicle race track only); 7. Motocross (including bicycle and motorcycle) race course (group 7948, motocross race course only); 8. Stadium, training, and practice facilities for professional baseball (group 7941). This use is allowed only if a Notice of Proposed Change or Substantial Deviation Application for Development Approval is processed in accordance with Section 380.06, F.S., or any successor statute, and the Hacienda Lakes DRI is amended. If state law changes such that DRI review or other state review is no longer required then this provision shall terminate; 9. Administrative offices and supportive service facilities; 10. Any other use or structure that is comparable in nature to the foregoing and that is approved by the Board of Zoning Appeals. B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: 1. Any accessory uses and structures that are incidental to and customarily associated with those uses permitted herein; 2. Onsite water management, utility, and service facilities; 3. Signs as permitted or required by the applicable Collier County Land Development Code at the time of application for construction permits; 4. Residential facilities (one (1) residential unit within the A, Attraction Tract) for housing of security personnel or caretakers whose work requires residence on the property; 5. Concessions, ticketing, bleachers, and other spectator -related facilities; Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words stfuek thfo„gh-are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: April 21, 2022 Page 13 of 79 Packet Pg. 472 3.D.d 6. Picnicking and playground areas, as well as areas for camping that may be utilized only three days prior to, during, and three days after a major event weekend. C. Conditional Uses: 1. Fuel storage and related facilities. m Y VIII TRACT "P" PRESERVE PERMITTED USES: c 2 No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or = in part, for other than the following: 0 a A. Principal Uses M O 1. Upland preserves; o 2. Wetland preserves; r O O N B Accessory Uses and Structures O N a Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and "' structures, including, but not limited to: CO N 1. Boardwalks, nature trails, horse trails, shelters, viewing platforms, educational signs, and information kiosks; 2. Water management structures; 3. Archaeological sites and associated research of said sites. VIIIX TRACT "PF" PUBLIC FACILITY PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses 1. Public safety facilities intended to provide emergency medical, ground transportation services. B. Accessory Uses Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: 1. Parking facilities and signage; 2. Administrative offices and support service facilities; 3. Lighting or storm water management facilities and structures. Hacienda Lakes MPUD PL20210001791 Last Revised: April 21, 2022 Words stfeek thfo gh-are deleted; Words underlined are added Page 14 of 79 Packet Pg. 473 3.D.d IX X1E TRACT "JD" JUNIOR DEPUTY PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: Open space and outdoor recreational uses, including, but not limited to hiking, biking, fishing, boating, camping, picnicking and nature trails; Sporting and recreational camps; Caretaker's residence, limited to two for the JD, Junior Deputy Tract. B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: Boardwalks, nature trails, shelters, pavilions, viewing piers, viewing platforms, educational signs, kiosks, and docks or platforms for launching and mooring or storage of non -motorized vessels utilizing movable storage racks; Covered camping pavilion(s) (i.e.: concrete, or similar hard surface, that is roofed, and may, or may not be enclosed with screen/plastic sheeting, or walls), which may include kitchen/cooking facilities, office and restroom facilities; Passive parks and passive recreational uses; 4. Pervious roads, driveways, and pervious and/or impervious parking facilities; 5. Project identification and directional signage; 6. Water management structures; 7. Restrooms/bath houses; 8. Roofed or unroofed storage for maintenance and recreational equipment; 9. Fencing and security gates, which may include barbed wire; 10. Archery and air rifle range(s). TRACT "S" SCHOOLS PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: Hacienda Lakes MPUD PL20210001791 Last Revised: April 21, 2022 Words stfuek-thfouglrare deleted; Words underlined are added Page 15 of 79 Packet Pg. 474 3.D.d Schools, public or private, including Educational Services (Group 82). B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: Educational facilities; Parking facilities and signage; 3. Administrative offices and support service facilities; 4. Lighting or storm water management facilities and structures; Recreational facilities. XI1 SIGNS: A. Seven on -premise, ground signs shall be permitted on property corners fronting on existing, proposed, or future public roadways as depicted and labeled "Boundary Marker" on Sheets 3 and 4 of the MPUD Master Plan Set. These ground signs shall be allowed in addition to other signage allowed by Section 5.06.00 of the LDC. Each of these permitted signs shall only contain the name of the project or any major use, insignia or motto of the entire development (See Exhibit E, Deviation #3). B. One real estate sign shall be permitted in the Commercial Tract for the purposes of marketing residential products within the MPUD. This additional real estate signage may be utilized by any of the developers of the residential communities within the MPUD (See Exhibit E, Deviation #6). C. The existing Swamp Buggy sign located in the southeast corner of Rattlesnake Hammock road and Collier Boulevard shall be allowed to remain until new signage can be permitted in Tract C. (See Exhibit E, Deviation #7) D. Two entr,signs g Collier Boulevard associated with the Hacienda Lakes - North Area shall be permitted to include multiple residential communities on a single sign to accommodate developments which share access to Collier Boulevard as depicted on Exhibit E-4, Hacienda Lakes — North Area Signage Deviation Exhibit, Sheet 2 of 2 (See Exhibit E, Deviations # 14, 15, and 16). Hacienda Lakes MPUD PL20210001791 Last Revised: April 21, 2022 Words stmek t#rettgh-are deleted; Words underlined are added Page 16 of 79 Packet Pg. 475 3.D.d EXHIBIT B DEVELOPMENTSTANDARDS GENERAL: Development of the Hacienda Lakes MPUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this Ordinance and applicable sections of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) and Growth Management Plan (GMP) in effect at the time of issuance of any development order, such as, but not limited to, final subdivision plat, final site development plan, excavation permit, and preliminary work authorization, to which such regulations relate. Where these regulations fail to provide developmental standards, then the provisions of the most similar district in the LDC shall apply. Conversion of residential land use types are provided for below which may be utilized to apportion units to senior housing or recreational vehicle units relative to the mix of residential land uses within this MPUD and their relation to public facility impacts. Table I below, sets forth the development standards for residential land uses within the MPUD, including residential land uses that are required to be developed in Tracts C and R/MU. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or Subdivision plat. Figures 1 thru 7 generally depict typical development standards for the various residential products. Table II below, sets forth the development standards for commercial land uses, senior housing units, and public facility land uses within the MPUD, however these standards do not apply to the Collier County School District public schools. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or Subdivision plat. Table III below, sets forth the development standards for the business park land uses and school land uses within the MPUD, however these standards do not apply to the Collier County School District public schools. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or Subdivision plat. Table IV below, sets forth the development standards for the Attraction land uses and Junior Deputy passive recreation land uses within the MPUD. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or Subdivision plat. The facilities and improvements that are depicted on Exhibit C, the MPUD Master Plan shall be considered conceptual in nature. The design, location, and configuration of land improvements shall be defined at either site development plan, or construction plans and plat approval(s). Except as provided for herein, all criteria set forth below shall be understood to be in relation to individual parcel or lot boundary lines, or between structures. Condominium, and/or homeowners' association boundaries shall not be utilized for determining development standards. MAXIMUM DENSITY AND INTENSITY: Residential Density: This MPUD shall be limited to 1,760 residential dwelling units (du) that equates to a density of 0.78 dwelling units per gross acre. The 1,760 residential units are either single- or multi -family units as defined in the LDC. No more than 1,232 multi -family units may be constructed in the entire PUD. Caretakers residences shall be deducted from the 1,760 unit allocation. A minimum of 25 residential units shall be constructed in the R/MU Tract, and a minimum of 17 residential units shall be constructed in Tract Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words stniek thr-ough are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: April 21, 2022 Page 17 of 79 Packet Pg. 476 3.D.d C. The balance of the residential dwelling units generated from Tract C (13 units) must be constructed in either the R/MU Tract, or on a portion of Tract R, within one-third of one mile of the boundary of Tract C. LAND USE CONVERSION FACTORS Residential Density: 1.0 residential unit equates to 4 Senior Housing Units (not to exceed 450 Senior Housing Units in the entire PUD). Up to 1,232 of the total 1,760 residential units may be multi -family as defined in the Land Development Code. Commercial Intensity: Hacienda Lakes is intended to be developed with a mixture of commercial land uses that include 327,500 square feet of gross floor area of retail uses, 50,000 square feet of gross floor area of medical office uses, 20,000 square feet of gross floor area of general office uses, 140,000 square feet of gross floor area of business park land uses, and 135 hotel rooms. In no event shall the project exceed 3,328 PM Peak Hour Trips. Such maximum trip generation cap was developed based on 327,500 gross square feet of retail land uses, 50,000 gross square feet of medical office land uses, 20,000 gross square feet of general office land uses, 140,000 gross square feet of business park land uses, a primary school with a contemplated enrollment of 919 students, 135 hotel rooms, not to exceed 92,000 gross square feet, 704 single-family units, and 1,056 multi -family units. However, the hotel shall not count against the 140,000 square foot cap associated with the business park. Should the BP Tract not be developed as a business park but be developed as a school facility (excluding Collier County School District public schools), such facility shall not exceed the maximum 140,000 gross square feet allowed in that Tract. The developer shall be allowed to convert retail land uses to office land uses at a one to one (1:1) ratio, not to exceed 25% of the retail land use allocation, provided only if the converted use is an allowed use in the tract. The developer shall also be allowed to wholly convert the hotel development opportunity of 135 rooms not to exceed 92,000 square feet to 60,000 square feet of gross floor area of business park land uses. All existing land uses and facilities in the Attraction and Junior Deputy Tracts shall not count against the overall trip and land use cap. Senior Housing Intensity: The intensity of any senior housing project shall have a maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 0.60. The 1, 760 dwelling unit cap is only intended to limit the number of single family and multi -family residential units, as those units are defined in the Land Development Code. The development may include in excess of 1,760 residential units if some are developed as senior housing units. With the exception of senior housing development in the C, Commercial Tract, senior housing units shall be developed through the conversion of residential land uses. Residential units shall be allowed for conversion to senior housing units based on the Land Use Conversion Factors, above. However, I single-family dwelling unit equates to 1 single-family style independent living units. In no instance shall greater than 450 senior housing units be developed in the entire MPUD. Total Project Intensity: In no event shall the project exceed 3,328 pm Peak Hour Trips. Operational Characteristics for Senior Housing Senior housing may be composed of one or more types of care/housing facilities. These care/housing types are limited to independent living, assisted living, and skilled nursing units, each of which can have varying operational characteristics. The following characteristics of senior housing care units distinguish them from Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words s*r��ough-are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: April 21, 2022 Page 18 of 79 Packet Pg. 477 3.D.d residential land uses, and all of the characteristics must be provided for and maintained to be considered a senior housing care unit: a. The facility shall be for residents 55 years of age and older; b. There shall be on -site dining facilities to the residents, with food service being on -site, or catered; c. Group transportation services shall be provided for the residents for the purposes of grocery and other types of shopping. Individual transportation services shall be coordinated for the residents needs, including but not limited to medical office visits; d. There shall be an onsite manager/activities coordinator to assist residents, who shall be responsible for planning and coordinating stimulating activities for the residents; e. An on -site wellness facility shall provide exercise and general fitness opportunities for the residents. f. Each unit shall be equipped with devices provided to notify emergency service providers in the event of a medical or other emergency; g. Independent living units shall be designed so that a resident is able to age in place. For example, kitchens may be easily retrofitted by lowering the sink to accommodate a wheelchair bound resident or bathrooms may be retrofitted by adding grab bars. h. Lands described as Hacienda Lakes Tracts G and I and designated as R/MU on the Master Plan are subject to the following: One Hundred Percent (100%) of the units will be restricted to households with 80% Annual Median Income (AMI) or less. This restriction shall remain in place for no less than thirty (30) years from the date issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. In combination with the commitment to affordability, the following operational characteristics apply to this project: a. The facility shall be for residents 62 years of age or older; b. There shall be an onsite manger/ activities coordinator to assist residents, who shall be responsible for planning and coordinating stimulating activities for the residents; c. An on -site wellness facility shall provide exercise and general fitness opportunities for the residents; d. Independent living units shall be designed so that a resident is able to age in place. For example, kitchens may be easily retrofitted by lowering the sink to accommodate a wheelchair bound resident or bathrooms may be retrofitted by adding grab bars. e. The TIS shall use ITE use code 252 Senior Living Attached due to the limited on -site services to better reflect projected trip generation. [HEX 2021-331 In addition to the above operational characteristics, the following site design characteristics apply to the Allegro at Hacienda Lakes project (lands described in PL20200001717): a. All principal structures on Tract I will be set back a minimum of 80 feet from the parcel boundary. [HEX2021-331 b. The one (1) dumpster external to the building on Tract I will be located on the east side of the principal structure and a minimum of 350 feet from the southern property line. The dumpster will be concrete block enclosure with gates and used for disposal of bulk household items only, such as furniture. Household refuse, such as food products, will be housed in trash compactors internal to the principal structure. [HEX2021-331 c. An enhanced 10-foot Type "A" buffer will be provided on Tract I along the portion of the southern property line adjacent to Esplanade at Hacienda Lakes meeting the following minimum specifications: 1. Total of 44 trees comprised of 11 canopy trees and 33 sabal palms. Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words stftisk thfougl-are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: April 21, 2022 Page 19 of 79 Packet Pg. 478 3.D.d 2. Canopy trees shall be a minimum of 10 feet tall at the time of planting. 3. Sabal palm trees shall be a minimum of 15'-30' staggered height at time of planting grouped in clusters with a minimum of three (3) palms per cluster, 10 feet on center. [HEX2021-331 d. Temporary construction fencing with a minimum height of five (5) feet shall be installed along the southern and eastern property lines throughout the duration of construction activities and shall include screen mesh fabric. [HEX2021-331 e. A 6-foot-tall earthtone (brown or beige) PVC fence shall be installed along the southern portion of the eastern property line as shown on Exhibit C-1. [HEX2021-331 f. All light fixtures/poles will be limited to a maximum height of 25 feet and will be "Dark Skies" compliant. Exterior wall lighting, on the buildings shall not be located above the second story. [HEX2021-33] g. On -site security measures shall include a recorded license plate reader at the entrance to the Allegro at Hacienda Lakes. All recorded data is private and confidential and will be provided to law enforcement upon their request. [HEX2021-331 h. The developer/operator agrees to provide a Resident Assurance Check -In Program materially consistent Florida Housing Finance Corporation requirements as referenced below: The developer will provide and use an established system of checking in with each resident on a pre -determined basis not less than once per day, at no cost to the resident. Residents may opt out of this program with a written certificate that they choose not to participate. FHEX2021-331 Sizn Development Standards • Boundary Markers shall be no greater than 15 feet in height, and shall not exceed 64 square feet of sign content area (See Exhibit E, Deviation #3). Each of these permitted signs shall only contain the name of the project or any major use, insignia or motto of the entire development. Hacienda Lakes MPUD PL20210001791 Last Revised: April 21, 2022 Words stfuek— hFougk-are deleted; Words underlined are added Page 20 of 79 Packet Pg. 479 3.D.d • Any signage proposed for identifying the on -site Swamp Buggy Attraction land use in the Commercial Tract may be illuminated and manually changeable so the traveling public may learn of upcoming events in the Attraction Tract. • Any land uses permitted within the boundaries of the MPUD shall be considered on -site for the purposes of providing for signage within the Commercial Tract, Site Development, or Plat Approval • At the time of each development order application subsequent to rezone approval, the developer or its successors and assigns shall submit a list of previously approved land uses (approved via site development plan, or plat), and the trips, commercial square footage and residential units consumed to date. Developer shall also provide to County a copy of its master list of land uses and converted uses for this PUD with each SDP or plat application in the form attached as Exhibit G. Hacienda Lakes MPUD PL20210001791 Last Revised: April 21, 2022 Words stfusk-thfough-are deleted; Words underlined are added Page 21 of 79 Packet Pg. 480 3.D.d TABLE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS CLUB SETBACK SINGLE FAMILY ZERO LOT TWO FAMILY/ TOWNHOUSE MULTI -FAMILY HOUSE/ REC F I01406 DETACHED LINE DUPLEX DWELLINGS REATION VERiEb6 BLDGS PARKS Principal Structures Minimum Lot Area 4,800 SF 4,000 SF 3,500 SF 1,800 SF per lot 1 acre 10,000 SF erlot Minimum Lot Width 40' 35' 35' per lot 18' per lot or 150' N/A 3-5-L unit 15'or%z 15'or%z 15'or%: 15'or%z Minimum Distance From BH, BH, BH, l5' or Y. 15' v BH MPUD Boundary "' whichever whichever whichever r isBH, whichever is r isBH, whichever is ch whichever a 3 is realer. is realer. is realer. greater. g reater. g. is greater. 20', or 15' 20', or 15' 20', or 15' with side with side with side 20' or %z BH, Front Yard Setback load load load 20' whichever is N/A 4-9- greater. garages garages garages Side Yard 6' 5' 0' or 10' 0' or 6' 0' or 6' %z BH N/A 15' or %z BH, Rear Yard 15, 15' 15, 15, whichever is N/A g' greater From Preserve 25' 25' 25' 25' 25' 25' Maximum Zoned Height 35' 35' 35' 45' 75' 40' 34)i Maximum Actual Height 42' 42' 42' 50' 85' 50' 1 351' Floor Area Minimum SF 1200 SF 1000 SF 1000 SF 900 SF 750 SF N/A N/A Minimum Distance 15' or''/z Between Principal 12' 10, 12' 12' %z SBH SBH, � Structures whichever is greater Accessory Structures Front SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS Side SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS Rear 5' 5' 5' 5' 5' 10, SPg From Preserve 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 4A'- Minimum Distance Between Accessory 0' or 10' 0' or 10' 0' or 10' 0' or 10' 0' or 10' 0' or 10' 4-01 Structures on same lot Minimum Distance Between Accessory and 0' or 10' 0' or 10' 0' or 10' 0' or 10' 0' or 10' 0' or 10' 0' of 10, PFineiple Principal Structures on same lot Maximum Zoned Height SPS SPS SPS SPS 35' SPS SPS Maximum Actual Height SPS SPS SPS SPS 35' SPS SPg 15'or%z 15'or%z 15'or%z 15'or% Minimum Distance From BH BH BH 15'or'/zBH 15'or%zBH BH 15,E„a4 MPUD Boundary "• whichever whichever whichever whichever is whichever is whichever =••`��,.�,�e.�-•-- is is greater is greater is greater greater greater is greater SPS: Same as Principal Structure LL: Lot Line BOC: Back of Curb Paseo: A pedestrian only access way to and from residences. N/A: Not Applicable BH: Zoned Building Height SBH: Sum of Building Heights "Principal and Accessory Uses shall not protrude or encroach into any required landscape buffer Hacienda Lakes MPUD PL20210001791 Last Revised: April 21, 2022 Words stfuek thfough are deleted; Words underlined are added Page 22 of 79 Packet Pg. 481 3.D.d General application of setbacks: Front yard setbacks shall comply with the following: i. If the parcel is served by a public or private road right-of-way, the setback is measured from the adjacent right-of-way line. ii. If the parcel is served by a non -platted private drive, the setback is measured from the back of curb or edge of pavement. iii. For corner lots, only one (1) front yard setback shall be required. The yard that does not contain the driveway/vehicular access to the residence shall provide 10' setback. This setback applies only to single family detached, zero lot line, and two family/duplex dwelling types with a maximum zoned building height of 35' within the Esplanade at 14asienda Lakes-prepei4y, as de}isted an Exhibit B 1, and the 4zuFe at 14mienda Lakes pfepeo" depieted an Exhibit B ' a4aes ed her -et. At the time of platting, intersections subject to the secondary front yard setback shall demonstrate compliance with sight distance triangles as set forth in LDC Section 6.06.05. [HEX 2015-06 & HEX 2016-201 Notes: 1) Structures adjacent to a lake may have no setback from the lake maintenance easement. 2) Entrance features (i.e.: guardhouse, clock towers and colonnades) are limited in height to no greater than 35 feet in actual height. 3) Two or three story multi -family structures may have terraced setbacks. Terraced setbacks shall be measured from the ground floor exterior wall, as long as a minimum 15-foot building wall setback is provided as depicted in Figure 1 below. 4) For all residential units, garages shall be located a minimum of 23 feet from the back of the sidewalk closest to the garage, except for side loaded garages, wherein a parking area 23 feet in depth must be provided perpendicular to the sidewalk to prevent vehicles being parked across a portion, or all of the referenced sidewalk. 5) No residential buildings greater than 50 feet in actual height shall be permitted west of the Florida Power and Light easement. 6) Minimum distance between principal structures for multi -family dwellings shall be 20 feet for multi -family buildings where both buildings have a zoned height less than 35 feet, or SBH for multi -family buildings exceeding 35 feet in zoned height, only for multi -family buildings within Azure at Hacienda Lakes, as depicted on Exhibit B-2, attached hereto. [HEX 2016-201 7) In the event the property is developed as a unified development with the San Marino PUD in the area west of the FPL easement, a zero -foot setback shall be allowed along the common property PUD boundary and no landscape buffer shall be required See deviation # 18). 8) Where the property owner in the San Marino PUD agrees to the elimination of a buffer east of the FPL Easement, a ten -foot setback shall be allowed along the common property PUD boundary and no landscape buffer shall be required (See deviation #18). Hacienda Lakes MPUD PL20210001791 Last Revised: April 21, 2022 Words stfusk thFeugh-are deleted; Words underlined are added Page 23 of 79 Packet Pg. 482 3.D.d PRO Figure 1 Terraced Setbacks i PRESERVE } sSTRUC►URE ✓�.��✓-�\l SETBM,KACCESSORY 10 FOOT MINIMUM ACCESSORY _ _ STRUCTURE SETBACK I FROM PRESERVE I 15' MIN. REAR YARD PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SEIBACK 25 FOOT MUM PRINWAL INM ACC. STR.' STRUCTURE SETBACK FROM PRESERVE I I I 61 MK 12' MIN.' MIN. 6' YIN. SIDE YARD PRINCIPAL I I STRUCTURE SETBACK PRINCPAL I 23' MIN. I I STRUCTURE (TYP-) I I FRONT YARD PRINCIPAL I4-1 �71 — — i FRONT YARD PRMCWAL STRUCTURE SETBACK I I STRUCTURE SETBACK 16' MIN. 11 �' MIN,3' YIN L ROW S' SIDEMIAIK—� — — — — BACK OF CURB 10' YIN CENTERLINE - I — — — — — ACC. SM - ACCESSORY STRUCTURE NOT TO SCALE NOT DRAWN PROPORTIONNIY Hacienda Lakes MPUD PL20210001791 Last Revised: April 21, 2022 Figure 2 Detached Single -Family Units Words stnask thr-o tgh-are deleted; Words underlined are added Page 24 of 79 Packet Pg. 483 3.D.d 10 FOOT MINIMUM ACCESSORY STRUCTURE SETBACK FROM PRESERVE 25 FOOT MINIMUM PRINCI STRUCTURE SEM FROM PRESEI PRESERVE MIN. REAR YARD ACCESSORY STRUCTURE SETBACK I 1 I 15' MIN. REAR YARD PRINCIPAL 1 STRUCTURE SETBACK ACC. STR. --r 10' MIN. 1 1 I23' TAN. I 1 I FRONT YARD PRINCIPAL 1 STRUCTURE SETBACK 1 Ts' ROW - 5' SIDEWALK - BACK OF CU 10' MN. CENTERLINE - ACC. STR. - ACCESSORY STRUCTURE 10 FOOT MNRIUM ACCESSORY -� STRUCI'M SEIGACK FROM PRESERVE 20 FOOT MINA N PRINCIPAL SIRUCRIRE SETBACK FROM PRESMA I I I I 1 10' MIN. VY MIN. 1 --'0' MN. SIDE YARD PRINCIPAL 1 1 1 STRUCTURE SETBACK 1 PRINCIPAL 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 FRONT YARD PRINCIPAL 1r_TT_ T 1 1 23' 1 ! STRUCTURE SETBACK NOT TO SCALE NOT DRAWN PROPORTIONALLY Figure 3 Detached Single-Family/Zero Lot Line Units PRCSER4E ✓J✓�.J �./�✓.N�./-� 3MIN WEAR YAM 511tl/CTJRE Si1BACkACCESSORY II I 1 rIV MN. REM YARD PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SUNAM AM, SM I ACC. SIX I 1 i 1 I ' TAR. I IY MN. I I I I 1 I I I PRINCIPAL I 1 23' MIN. I I STRUCnft I I I I 1 FRONT YAW PRINCIPAL ETRuCRIRE SET11ACK I -J I II ' / 1 1S, — �- — — — s, SIOCrAax— 9AM Of CU 10' MN. COITiA1JNE _ _.} - _ _ _ ACC. STIR. - ACCOSORI STRUCTURE NOT TO SCALE Nor DRAWN PAOPORTIONAUY Figure 4 Duplex and Two -Family Units Hacienda Lakes MPUD PL20210001791 Last Revised: April 21, 2022 NO SIDE YARD REQUIRED FOR ATTACHED PRINCIPAL UNITS W RANI. SDE YARD PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK N 0 Y R J R C R 2 d M O O 0 0 M N O N J d T_ O O N Words stfusk thr-augh-are deleted; Words underlined are added Page 25 of 79 Packet Pg. 484 3.D.d ,O FOOT kOHMN ACCESSORY FROM PRESERVE 25 FODT MINIMUM PFNWX---� 9FR FROM SETBACK FRONT YARD PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK ROM a' SIDEWAUi BACK OF CURE En�«x..• PRESERVE 1 1) W MIN. REM YARD ACCESSORY STRUCTURE SETBACK II I __/3TRUCTURE WtHACK 13PRIICIPN I I I I I WNNUMNI I ATTACHED PRINCIPAL UFITS I I ra' IM. SIDE YARD PRIKWAL STRIK TURF SIVRAM I I NOT TO SCALE NOT DRAWN PROPORTONALR.Y Figure 5 Attached Single -Family and Townhouse Units rwaon'[ e' YNA N rAAp ACC Smuc'lurll �atratac 10 rm keem !`-s�G.Sr�_`-G`�G�G✓- _ - - _ - TIMCi UK- - __ - - > IDACK n olF riltsnl 0 FM NIIMMJY 1 I ACC, IM ACC. M ,,,,COX frNUCNK SPOACN FrWM PAIk3M rit VADW NDOW WO" N[1PRE at Y _._ I Weer urt� It= Waim WK "M or — TB _ AM WX - AOCCCO Y l "%X"ft f Nor M pant Nor awm PAgpa"W LLr Figure 6 Multi -Family Units Hacienda Lakes MPUD PL20210001791 Last Revised: April 21, 2022 N d Y M J R C 2 0 R 2 EL M O r O O M N O N J CL LO r O CM N Words stfuek thfetigh are deleted; Words underlined are added Page 26 of 79 Packet Pg. 485 3.D.d TABLE II COMMERCIAL, INCLUDING MIXED USE BUILDINGS, PUBLIC FACILITY, AND SENIOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS DEVELOPMENTSTANDARD PRINCIPAL USES ACCESSORY USES INIMUM LOT AREA 10,000 SQUARE FEET N/A INIMUM LOT WIDTH 100 FEET N/A INIMUM YARDS (MEASURED FROM LOT BOUNDARY) 25 FEET OR'/z THE BUILDING HEIGHT, WHICHEVER IS GREATER* * * 10 FEET INIMUM YARDS (MEASURED FROM MPUD OUNDARIES * * * * 25 FEET 10 FEET RESERVE SETBACK 25 FEET 10 FEET IN. DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES 15 FT. OR'/z THE SUM OF BUILDING HEIGHTS* 10 FEET AXIMUM ZONED HEIGHT 50 FEET***** 25 FEET AXIMUM ACTUAL HEIGHT 60 FEET***** 30 FEET INIMUM FLOOR AREA — COMMERCIAL INIMUM FLOOR AREA - SENIOR HOUSING INIMUM FLOOR AREA - PUBLIC FACILITY 600 SQUARE FEET** 350 SQUARE FEET 1,500 SQUARE FEET N/A N/A N/A IN. GROSS FLOOR AREA PER UNIT 600 SQUARE FEET** 80 SQUARE FEET** * Whichever is greater ** Not applicable to kiosks *** General application for setbacks: Front yard setbacks shall comply with the following: i. If the parcel is served by a public or private road right-of-way, the setback is measured from the adjacent right-of-way line. ii. If the parcel is served by a non -platted private drive, the setback is measured from the back of curb or edge of pavement. **** Principal and Accessory Structures shall not protrude or encroach into any required landscape buffer. ***** except that a hotel, destination resort, senior housing or mixed use building may be up to 75 feet in zoned height and 85 feet in actual height. Note: Any independent living unit proposed for development in a single-family type of configuration shall comply with the development standards for single-family land uses set forth in Table I. Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words st eek thFough-are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: April 21, 2022 Page 27 of 79 Packet Pg. 486 3.D.d TABLE III BUSINESS PARK AND SCHOOL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS (EXCLUDES COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT PUBLIC SCHOOLS) DEVELOPMENTSTANDARD PRINCIPAL USES ACCESSORY USES INIMUM LOT AREA 8,000 SQUARE FEET N/A INIMUM LOT WIDTH 80 FEET N/A INIMUM YARDS (MEASURED FROM TRACT 50 FEET*** 10 FEET BOUNDARY)- BUSINESS PARK INIMUM YARDS (MEASURED FROM TRACT 50 FEET*** 25 FEET BOUNDARY) -SCHOOL INIMUM YARDS (MEASURED FROM MPUD NAA N,A OUNDARIES)- BUSINES PARK 50 FEET 10 FEET INIMUM YARDS MEASURED FROM MPUD 50 FEET 25 FEET OUNDARIES -SCHOOL RESERVE SETBACK 25 FEET 10 FEET IN. DISTANCE BETWEEN 15 FT. OR%: THE SUM OF 10 FEET STRUCTURES- BUSINESS PARK BUILDING HEIGHTS IN. DISTANCE BETWEEN OR 18 FEET 10 FEET STRUCTURES -SCHOOL AXIMUM ZONED HEIGHT - BUSINESS PARK 35 FEET 35 FEET AXIMUM ZONED HEIGHT - SCHOOL 50 FEET 50 FEET AXIMUM ACTUAL HEIGHT- BUSINESS PARK 50 FEET 35 FEET AXIMUM ACTUAL HEIGHT - SCHOOL 60 FEET 60 FEET INIMUM FLOOR AREA- BUSINESS PARK 1000 SQUARE FEET N/A INIMUM FLOOR AREA - SCHOOL OR 350 SQUARE FEET 35 SQUARE FEET IN. GROSS FLOOR AREA PER UNIT USINESS PARK 500 SQUARE FEET 80 SQUARE FEET SCHOOL N/A N/A * Whichever is greater *** General application for setbacks: Front yard setbacks shall comply with the following: i. If the parcel is served by a public or private road right-of-way, the setback is measured from the adjacent right-of-way line. ii. If the parcel is served by a non -platted private drive, the setback is measured from the back of curb or edge of pavement. The Lord's Way Access Improvements: In the event that Tract BP is developed as a business park, the Lord's Way shall be improved by the Developer with roadway facilities as depicted by LDC Appendix B-4, a Commercial/Industrial typical Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words stfusk thr-ough-are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: April 21, 2022 Page 28 of 79 Packet Pg. 487 3.D.d roadway section, prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for a business park land use. In the event that Tract BP is developed as an educational facility, the Lord's Way shall be improved by the Developer as depicted by LDC Appendix 8-3, a Local Street typical roadway section. TABLE IV ATTRACTION AND JUNIOR DEPUTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PRINCIPAL USES ACCESSORY USES MINIMUM LOT AREA 1 ACRE N/A MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 100 FEET N/A MINIMUM YARDS (MEASURED FROM TRACT BOUNDARY) 20 FEET, PLUS 1 FOOT FOR EACH 2 FEET OF BLDG. HT. OVER50 FEET 20 FEET MINIMUM YARDS (MEASURED FROM MPUD BOUNDARIES 25 FEET 20 FEET PRESERVE SETBACK 25 FEET 10 FEET MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES 15 FT. OR%: THE SUM OF BUILDING HEIGHTS* 10 FEET MAXIMUM ZONED HEIGHT 50 FEET 50 FEET MAXIMUM ACTUAL HEIGHT 75 FEET 75 FEET MINIMUM FLOOR AREA 1000 SQUARE FEET** N/A * Whichever is greater ** Not applicable to modular units, trailers, towers, camping pavilion, and similar structures to support the utilization of the attraction facilities, which have no minimum floor area limitations Parking for Junior Deputy: Required parking for the JD designated areas of the MPUD shall be calculated at the rate of one parking space for each 1000 square feet of covered camping pavilion. Junior Deputy Target Orientation: Archery and air rifle ranges shall be oriented for a line of fire only to the east, or north, and shall have a back stop that shall be comprised of absorbing materials such as an earthen berm, hay bales, or similar treatments, each installed according to industry standards, to prohibit projectiles from exiting the range area. Hacienda Lakes MPUD PL20210001791 Last Revised: April 21, 2022 Words stfusl eugh-are deleted; Words underlined are added Page 29 of 79 Packet Pg. 488 3.D.d Approved by HEX Decision 2015-06 B_1 ESPLANADE AT HACIENDA LAKES PROJECT LOCATION MAP Exhibit B Page 3 of 3 Packet Pg. 489 Approved by HEX Decision 2016-20 EXHIBIT B-2 AZURE AT HACIENDA LAKES PROJECT LOCATION MAP Exhibit "l" Page 3 of 7 Packet Pg. 490 3.D.d EXHIBIT B-3 HACIENDA LAKES NORTH PROJECT LOCATION MAP PREPARED FOR: FLORIDA CERTIFICATE OF AUTHROIZATION 48636 "IN ' 'roll Broth erS SECTION: 14 TOWNSHIP:50 RANGE:26 104"ENGINEERING AMERICA'S LUXURY HOME BUILDER' COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ENGINEERING I PLANNING I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 24201 WALDEN CENTER DRIVE, SUITE 204 BONITA SPRINGS, FLORIDA 34134 FILE NAME: 1284100E l5 28100 BONITA GRANDsPRING . FIL 34 SURE 305 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135 P: 239-4057777 F: 239-405.7899 PHONE: (239) 596-6600 SHEET: I OF 1 EMAIL Inlo@w Idropengl—eing— Packet Pg. 491 3.D.d Exhibit C 9 gg r4' o nz = a c �� of 6s �� --- s a g, f i i + I i if llit i"i ti rill j i T }tt i All�l��} Q take= �kEL Y� r ynE!e ♦ 4yfra; Is yyt: €d�p y#r o.jf 1 raat_�g NACIE;YDALAKESOF�'APLES,LLC / ACIENDA LAKES Imsa OVERALL MPL'D/DRI MPUD/DR/ • MASTER PLAN N as �a J 2 f7 a M 0 to 0 0 M N 0 N J iL r 0 o� Packet Pg. 492 3.D.d P, .PRESERVE TRACT LAND USE SUMMARY DESIGNATOR LAUD USE ACREAGE 'C'" COMMERCIAL 34.16t ACRES 'COMMERCIAL LANDS ENCUMBERED BY PUBLIC ROW TRACT ""2.513 ACRES "A" ATTRACTION 07.27t ACRES 'R' RESIDENTIAL 4474Bt ACRES BUSINESS PARK 35,3%ACRES 'P PRESERVE 1546.11t ACRES PUBLIC FACIUTY 1.33t ACRES 'JD" JUNIOR DEPUTY 21.62t ACRES "S" SCHOOL 1S.SSt ACRES "R/MU" RESIDENTIALJMEDICAL USE 138.8aACRES "ROW' I PUBLIC ROW/ EASEMENTS 17004tACRES TOTAL 1 2262.14t ACRES THE COMBINED TOTAL OF THESE TWO ACREAGES EQUALS THE ACTIVITY CENTER ACREAGE OF 38.87 EXCLUDE THIS ACREAGE WHEN TOTALING PROJECT AREA AS IT IS INCLUDED IN THE RICUITUR y ¢ - _ - _ 'ROW' TRACT B 0FED WLLGW RUN RPUD Y2 y n LEGEND w A - ArrnncnoN TRACT O'21 P - BUSINESS PARK R g = _ � R _ C - COMMERCIAL vAu - R L��JJ R UN RPUO P PRESERVE TRACT •9EE NOTE u PF PUBUC FACILITIES TRACT (EMS) R P, JO JUNIOR DEPUTY PRESERVE MBLY ioeA O R O f ' ` TRACT s _ SCHOOLS MMS BI SPUD ,1J/ •L 7 R RESIDENTIAL TRACT wAswAlwN — • _ • .• L " RIMU - RESIDENTIAL I MEDICAL USE ROW - PUBLIC ROW I EASEMENTS c �umru o. w" L _ IAQRICULTURE PROPOSED PUBIC R.O.W. A _.. - 11 SERVE_ r lR10EVELOPEO � RESERVATION sTbN ACT _ ED ACCESS EASES NOT EXISTING ACCESSED FORV VACATION PROPOSED FOR VACATION 7 11"11111111 1I IAGRICULTURE,''1"''IIIIII V .. A, AGRICULTURE a� Y J cC C N cC 2 IL M Q r r 0 M N 0 N J IL Lo 0 N Packet Pg. 493 3.D.d — --COLLIER REG OVAL C MEDICAL CENTER PCO L = RnAu 9 RPUD ROCKEDGE R /l L R L � R R L L A. AGRICULTURE ow HOMES AND PRIVATE + nm N AAGRILlATWE SERY USES H NGR'—TILY SS GNIMBbUSES ES �gN LAND USE SUMMARY DESIGNATOR IANOUBE ACREAGE "C' COMMERCILL S1.IBL ACRES 'COMMERCIAL lAN05 ENCUMBERED BY PUBLIC ROIN TRACT "2.SU ACRES ATTRACTION 47 27i ACRES RESIDENTIAL 447.Bh AMES 'BP BUSINESS PARK BB.BSB ACRES PRESERVE UuuLI1i ACRES "Pp PUBLIC FACILITY I. ACRES "IC JUNIOR DEPUTY CR 2162, AES "S' SCHOOL 19 XH ACRES 'EE RESIDENTIALIMECICAL USE 28.82a ACRES "ROW' PUBLIGROWIEASEMENT9 TO -ACRES TOTAL 2-1h ACRES Pf PUBLIC fAquTIEt TRACT IEMB1 T. K - - - -Z- ------------ � -TCH LINE -9EE SHEET 1 .. _ - AAGR CULTURE IINOF/ELOPED i — — — — TitLJCGwG • -TRACT!" - - -------------- N A AGRICULTURE UNDEVELOPED AI AGRICULTURE DEVELOPED A,AGRICU TUBE iMOEVELOPEO AAGRICULTWE A,AGRICULTORE GRED UNDEVELOPED — —P - — _ — — — AAGRICULTURE �E(ARCELR —�RRES£RVE",. — — — — — -• UNDEVELOPED 7i3dC,�' - P. -... PRESERVE TRACT A AGRICULTURE UNDEVELOPED 'A Packet Pg. 494 3.D.d HACIENDA LAKES NATIVE PRESERVE SUMMARY DESCRIPTION TOTAL URBAN(AC) RURAL(AC) PROJECT AREA 2262A4 625.07 1637.07 ON -SITE NATIVE VEGETATION 1721.97 295.38 1426S9 LESS THE NATIVE M WITHIN RATTLESNAKE HAMFt 1M 2.02 2.02 0.00 LESS THE NATIVE VEC WRHON THE LORDS WAY EST. OA2 0.42 0011 LESS THE NATIVE VEO WITHIN THE SWNEELD ROAD CORRICOR II'm 5.01 5.93 LESS THE NATIVE VEO WITHIN ARCHAEOLOGICAL PRPS'SRVES 6.07 1.06 5.02 NATIVE VEGETATION FOR REQUIREMENT CALCULATIONS 1702.46 286.87 1415+64 PERCENTAGE FOR REQUIRED NATIVE PRESERVE 25% REQUIRED NATIVE VEGETATION <921.09 71.71 -249.39 PRESERVED NATIVE VEGETATION-- 1395.33 d0.81 1354.54 COMPENSATENO NATIVE PRESERVE (k URP DEPIQT)^ 61.80 TOTAL PRESERVE AREA 1546.11 53.06 149305 NATIVE PRESERVE REQUIREMENT (LDC SUBSECTION 2.05.02 B.2.G.IIJ OF 90% WITHIN THE RFMUD SENDING LANDS EXCEEDS 60% OF THE TOTAL PROJECT RFMUD SENDING LANDS, THEREFORE, OVER 60% OF THE TOTAL PROJECT RFMUD SENDING LANDS SHALL BE THE REQUIRED RURAL NATIVE VEGETATION AREA COMPLIANCE WITH LDC SUBSECTION 3.05.07 H.A.A., REQUIRES NATIVE VEGETATION PLANTING ENHANCEMENT OF A MINIMUM OF 12.24 ACRES OF THE PROJECTS URF SUBDISTRICT PRESERVE TRACT. COMPLIANCE WITH 100%OF THE NATIVE VEGETATION PRESERVATION REQUIREMENT SHALL BE ACHIEVED THROUGH PRESERVING RFMUD PROJECT NATIVE VEGETATION IN AN AMOUNT TWO TIMES THE DEFICIENT NATIVE VEGETATION PRESERVE ACREAGE IN THE URF SUBDISTRICT PROJECT LANDS AS IS PROVIDED FOR THROUGH THE ADOPTED GMP AMENDMENT. MPUD MASTER PLAN NOTES: 1. WITHIN THE MPUD BOUNDARIES THERE WILL BE A MINIMUM OF 60% USEABLE OPEN SPACE. 2. THE FACILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PUD MASTER PLAN SHALL BE CONSIDERED CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE, 3. THE DESIGN, LOCATION, AND CONFIGURATION OF THE LAND IMPROVEMENTS, LAKES, AND/OR ENTRY POINTS SHALL BE DEFINED AT EITHER SDP OR CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND PLAT APPROVAL. 4. IF THE ROAD EASEMENTS IN THE PETITION PL20210002687 ARE VACATED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, THEN THESE ACCESS CONNECTIONS ARE ALLOWED. IF THE PETITION FOR VACATION IS NOT APPROVED, THEN THESE ACCESS CONNECTIONS ARE NOT ALLOWED. 5. SEE EXHIBIT C-2 FOR NORTH AREA DEVIATION LOCATIONS. MAXIMUM DENSITY AND INTENSITY RESIDENTIAL DENSITY: THIS MPUD SHALL BE UMITED TO 1,760 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS (DU) THAT EQUATES TO A DENSITY OF 0.78 DWELLING UNITS PER GROSS ACRE, THE 1,760 RESIDENTIAL UNITS ARE EITHER SINGLE OR MULTI -FAMILY UNITS AS DEFINED IN THE LOC. NO MORE THAN 1.232 MULTI -FAMILY UNITS MAY BE CONSTRUCTED IN THE ENTIRE PUD. CARETAKER'S RESIDENCES SHALL BE DEDUCTED FROM THE 1,780 UNIT ALLOCATION. A MINIMUM OF 25 RESIDENTIAL UNITS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN THE R/MU TRACT, AND A MINIMUM OF 17 RESIDENTIAL UNITS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN TRACT C. THE BALANCE OF THE RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS GENERATED FROM TRACT C (13 UNITS) MUST BE CONSTRUCTED IN EITHER THE R/MU TRACT, OR ON A PORTION OF TRACT R, WITHIN ONE-THIRD OF ONE MILE OF THE BOUNDARY OF TRACT C RESIDENTIAL DENSITY: 1.0 RESIDENTIAL UNIT EQUATES TO 4 SENIOR HOUSING UNITS (NOT TO EXCEED 450 SENIOR HOUSING UNITS IN THE ENTIRE PUD). UP TO 1.232 OF THE TOTAL 1,760 RESIDENTIAL UNITS MAY BE MULTI -FAMILY AS DEFINED IN THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. COMMERCIAL INTENSITY: HACIENDA LAKES IS INTENDED TO BE DEVELOPED WITH A MIXTURE OF COMMERCIAL LAND USES THAT INCLUDE 327,500 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF RETAIL USES, 50,000 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF MEDICAL OFFICE USES, 20,000 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF GENERAL OFFICE USES, 140,000 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF BUSINESS PARK LAND USES, AND 135 HOTEL ROOMS. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE PROJECT EXCEED 3,328 PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS. SUCH MAXIMUM TRIP GENERATION CAP WAS DEVELOPED BASED ON 327,500 GROSS SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL LAND USES, 50,000 GROSS SQUARE FEET OF MEDICAL OFFICE LAND USES, 20.000 GROSS SQUARE FEET OF GENERAL OFFICE LAND USES, 140,000 GROSS SQUARE FEET OF BUSINESS PARK LAND USES, A PRIMARY SCHOOL WITH A CONTEMPLATED ENROLLMENT OF 919 STUDENTS, 135 HOTEL ROOMS, NOT TO EXCEED 92,000 GROSS SQUARE FEET, 704 SINGLE-FAMILY UNITS, AND 1,056 MULTI -FAMILY UNITS. HOWEVER, THE HOTEL SHALL NOT COUNT AGAINST THE 140,000 SQUARE FOOT CAP ASSOCIATED WITH THE BUSINESS PARK. SHOULD THE BP TRACT NOT BE DEVELOPED AS A BUSINESS PARK BUT BE DEVELOPED AS A SCHOOL (EXCLUDING COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT PUBLIC SCHOOLS), SUCH FACILITY SHALL NOT EXCEED THE MAXIMUM 140,000 GROSS SQUARE FEET ALLOWED IN THAT TRACT. THE DEVELOPER SHALL BE ALLOWED TO CONVERT RETAIL LAND USES TO OFFICE LAND USES AT A ONE TO ONE (1:1) RATIO, NOT TO EXCEED 25% OF THE RETAIL LAND USE ALLOCATION PROVIDED ONLY IF THE CONVERTED USE IS AN ALLOWED USE IN THE TRACT. THE DEVELOPER SHALL. BE ALLOWED TO WHOLLY CONVERT THE HOTEL DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY OF 135 ROOMS NOT TO EXCEED 92,000 SQUARE FEET TO 60,000 SQUARE FEET OF BUSINESS PARK LAND USES. ALL EXISTING LAND USES AND FACILITIES IN THE ATTRACTION AND JUNIOR DEPUTY TRACTS SHALL NOT COUNT AGAINST THE OVERALL TRIP AND LAND USE CAP. SENIOR HOUSING INTENSITY: THE INTENSITY OF ANY SENIOR HOUSING PROJECT SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR) OF 0.50. THE DWELLING UNIT CAP IS ONLY INTENDED TO LIMIT THE NUMBER OF SINGLE-FAMILY AND MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL UNITS AS THOSE UNITS ARE DEFINED IN THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, THE DEVELOPMENT MAY INCLUDE IN EXCESS OF 1,760 RESIDENTIAL UNITS IF SOME ARE DEVELOPED AS SENIOR HOUSING UNITS, WATH THE EXCEPTION OF SENIOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT IN THE C COMMERCIAL TRACT, SENIOR HOUSING UNITS SHALL BE DEVELOPED THROUGH THE CONVERSION OF RESIDENTIAL LAND USES. RESIDENTIAL UNITS SHALL BE ALLOWED FOR CONVERSION TO SENIOR HOUSING UNITS BASED ON THE LAND USE CONVERSION FACTORS ABOVE. HOWEVER, 1 SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT EQUATES TO 1 SINGLE-FAMILY STYLE INDEPENDENT UVING UNITS. IN NO INSTANCE SHALL GREATER THAN 450 SENIOR HOUSING UNITS BE DEVELOPED IN THE MPUD. TOTAL PROJECT INTENSITY: IN NO EVENT SHALL THE PROJECT EXCEED 3.325 PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS. i :1 1 M 0 r r 0 0 M N 0 N J IL Ln 0 CD N i d 7 u O c CL V m m T C m 2 CL a M d E t m a CD E m a Packet Pg. 495 3.D.d LEGEND /- * INGRESS/EGRESS LAKE PROJECT AREA = 6.71t ACRES TRACT "C" = COMMERCIAL TRACT "R/MU" = RESIDENTIAL/MEDICAL USE TRACT "R" = RESIDENTIAL Approved by HEX Decision 2021-33 r — A RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK ROAD TRACT nCD COLLIER REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER PALAC I O 1 ERRACE WESTI Q P %/. VIALE !:% I WAY , TRACT 11RII PALACIO - TERRACE HACIENDA LAKES MPUD EXHIBIT C-1: R/MU ACCESS TO RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK ROAD ENGINEERING PREPARED FOR: SECTION: TOWNSHIP: RANGE: COLLIGRCOUNTY LIVIIENGINEERPIG I PLANNING LANDSCAPEARCNITECTURE HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC 23 50 26 FLORIDA TB 100 BONITA GRANITE DRIVE •SUITE 305 BONITA SPRINGS. FL 3a133 7742 ALICO ROAD REVISION DATE: 11/1 1/2020 p: 239405.7777 F:239•405.7899 FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912 SHEET: I OF I EM4IT: Ingo@waldMpengineedng.com N d �a J C u 2 0 a M O r O 0 0 M N O N J d r O O� Packet Pg. 496 property line enhanced sobal palm buffer 115'-30' staggered ht.) existing 15' wide type'B'— - - - code required canopy tree landscape buffer 110' ht.1 ex. 6' wal' Esplanade at - Allegro at a Hacienda Lakes Hacienda Lakes 1 SECTION D -s Proposed "70 building _ O Y' 15'wide !ype'B' landscape buffer � 1 07 fulure required 10' wide t parkng amenity parking _ ,1d _ t type'A'landscape 1 t buffer T t' t y - - existing 6' wall I 1 T 1 �' y � exlsting • �( '� lake requiredl0'wide open 80 billy setba,k _F i �• type'A' landscape space buffer - J Y �'YY.' f. ,7',' a ,•�" .y.1, p r,. : �' �,r, _ 0' {3p, � enhanced 10'snde lype'A' landscape ' s\ Q buffer existing 6' wall -- existing 15'wide type'B' landscape buffer t I !a xst ng 517E PLAN WALDROP..�«w r.Y r:•�II MaDOWEI Attachment: Attachment 3 - Applicant Backup Documents (29015 : PL20230016103 - PDI - Hacienda Lakes) I I I 1 I A, AGRICULTURI UNDEVELOPED I® , Al R rn I j I I J m 1 Jj FIRST F MINIST 0 J (V ------------------------- LU -- z - - i =I�-- W IG --- ----- --------------------I i i I LEGEND A ATTRACTION TRACT ROW PUBLIC ROW/EASEMENTS SR BUSINESS PARN Q DEVIATIONLOCATION F PRESERVE TRACT PROPOSED PUBIC R. O.W. RESERVATION FF PUBLIC FACILITIES TRACT(EMS) R - RES0ENTIALTRACT RELOCATED OR EAISTINO ACCESS EASEMENTS NOT PROPOSED FOR VACATION • IF THE ROAD EASEMENTS IN THE PETITION R-11-I887 ARE VACATED BY THE BOARD OF CWNTY COMMISSIONERS, THEN THESE ACCESS CONNECTIONS ARE ALLOWED. IF THE PETITION FOR VACATION IS NOT APPROVED, THEN THESE ACCESS CONNECTIONS ARE NOT ALLOWED. WILLOW RUN RPUD I U-I N WI 0 LL zIW Uwlo 1Z V ILL J Ln W I�I 0 En W 1� zl W Qi X Cl i R I R L R L R ® WILLOW`RUN RPUD 1* I � , I , BP U L ABLY 35.38 AC. L R PUD ROW �I PRESERVATION / EXISTING SWAMP - .i f BUGGY BUILDING L A I I' I EXISTING — ' SWAMP BUGGY TRACK I I i P, PRESERVE TRACT I P, PRESERVE -, TRACT A, AGRICULTURE UNDEVELOPED Packet Pg. 498 3.D.d EXHIBIT D LEGAL DESCRIPTION A TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF COLLIER, LYING IN SECTION 1 I THROUGH 14 AND 23 THROUGH 25, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST AND SECTION 19 AND 30, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING FURTHER BOUND AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 30; THENCE S.89° 10'42"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION FOR 2835.68 FEET TO THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.89011'14"W. ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE FOR 2906.24 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 25; THENCE S.89°09'39"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION FOR 2693.18 FEET TO THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.89° 11'01 "W. ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE FOR 2693.80 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.00°13'35"W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION FOR 2636.34 FEET TO THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.00014'15"W. ALONG SAID WEST LINE FOR 2637,01 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.87107'13"E. ALONG A LINE COMMON TO SAID SECTION 24 AND 25 FOR 1704.07 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 24; THENCE N.01°08'02"E. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 684.58 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87012'28"E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 340.01 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.01*04'11"E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2052.01 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.87°28'21"W. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 2025.64 FEET TO THE QUARTER CORNER COMMON TO SAID SECTIONS 23 AND 24; THENCE S.89001'58"W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23 FOR 1328.51 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.01018'52"W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 679.65 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE S.89022'00"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 663.28 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.01°14'38"E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 675.75 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S.89°01'58"W. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 664.25 FEET; THENCE CONTINUE S.89001'58"W. ALONG SAID LINE FOR 627.16 FEET; THENCE N.01'01'15"E. FOR 1699.99 FEET; THENCE S.89°01'58"W. FOR 701.42 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF A 170 FOOT WIDE FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY EASEMENT; THENCE S.01°01'15"W. ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR 68.31 FEET; THENCE S.89"01'58"W. FOR 1232.97 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF LANDS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 21, AT PAGE 183 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF SAID COLLIER COUNTY; THENCE N.00°51'54"E. ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR 956.27 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH A LINE 30.00 FEET SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH (AS MEASURED ON A PERPENDICULAR) THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE N.87037'3I"E. ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE FOR 1237.00 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY EASEMENT; THENCE N.01°01'15"E. ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR 30.05 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE N.87°37'31"E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1337.24 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE N.00°48'00"E. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2683.32 TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.87°31'38"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 334.19 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00148'll"E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1341.38 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.87°2842"W. ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE FOR 1002.41 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY EASEMENT; THENCE N.00°48'45"E. ALONG SAID WEST Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 BCC Approved 10/25/1 1 Page 40 of 79 Packet Pg. 499 1 3.D.d AND EAST LINE FOR 335.13 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.87°27'58"W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1236.32 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID LANDS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 21, AT PAGE 183; THENCE N.00°49'30"E. ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR 1004.62 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 11; THENCE N.00050'27"E. ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR 344.07 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE N.87°28'56"E. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 1235.95 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00°49'13"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 342.92 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE N.87°25'45"E. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 1336.32 FEET TO THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE CONTINUE N.87°25'45"E. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 668.16 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.00°47'37"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 671.11 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 14; THENCE N.87°27'14"E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 668.22 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00047'14"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 671.39 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87°28'42"E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 14 1336.55 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE N.87030'06"E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1328.72 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00038'50"E. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1345.26 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE N.00041'44"E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2707.07 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87°40'34"E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1321.29 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00°36'23"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2701,30 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION SAID POINT BEING THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE S,87°26'11"W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION FOR 662.90 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.00°35'02"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1345.93 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.87030'06"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 664.36 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND SAID SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.00°38'50"W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER FOR 672.63 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87°32'03"E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 665.09 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00035'02"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER FOR 672.97 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.87°33'59"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 665.81 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00038'51"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER FOR 1345.10 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.87°37'27"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 667.27 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.00042'40"W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1344.51 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 24; THENCE N.87040'54"E. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 2006.20 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE S.00°56'29"W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1368.25 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87°34'58"E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1343.68 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00041'32"E. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1365.31 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87°41'38"E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER FOR 1337.58 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.00026'32"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION FOR 1703.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 41 of79 Packet Pg. 500 3.D.d NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE S.87033'18"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 672.60 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE S.00034'02"W. ALONG SAID WEST LINE FOR 1022.89 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87°28'21"E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 674.89 FEET TO THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 19; THENCE S.88012'42"E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER FOR 3093.52 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.03039'20"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2676.74 FEET TO THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.88°56'10"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2940.59 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.87007'20"W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 25 FOR 2726.50 FEET TO THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.87°07'13"W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER FOR 807.16 FEET; THENCE S.03°18'31"E. FOR 1451.00 FEET; THENCE N.88056'54"E. FOR 1582.00 FEET; THENCE S.00131'35"E. FOR 1130.61 FEET; THENCE 5.89°15'59"E. FOR 1823.18 FEET TO THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.89057'58"E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SAID SECTION 30 FOR 2200.53 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.00037'14"W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1344.51 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.89°34'43"E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 365.01 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF; THENCE 5.00°41'48"W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 671.03 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.89023'00"E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 364.14 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.89°22'35"E. FOR 710.09 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF; THENCE N.00°52'45"E. FOR 1334.78 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF; THENCE S.89°46'12"W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 356.23 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00°49'34"E. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF FOR 668.60 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.89°57'58"E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SAID SECTION 30 FOR 2497.82 FEET TO THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.O1 ° 12'08"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION FOR 2640.60 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 101,084,043 SQUARE FEET OR 2,320.6 ACRES +/- LESS AND EXCEPT THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCELS: PARCEL "A" BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SAID SECTION 30; THENCE S.00059' 10"W. FOR 1329.95 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF; THENCE S.89022'35"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 355.05 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00°55'57"E. FOR 1332.36 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF; THENCE N.89°46'12"E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 356.23 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 473,270 SQUARE FEET OR 10.9 ACRES +/- PARCEL "B" BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTEROF SAID SECTION 24; THENCE N.87°28'21"E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1349.77 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00°40'10"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1361.17 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.87017'48"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1356.51 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00056'29"E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 42 of 79 Packet Pg. 501 3.D.d 682.86 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.87023'02"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 338.41 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.0I000'20"E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 683.43 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87°28'21 "E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 337.61 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 2,072,100 SQUARE FEET OR 47.6 ACRES +/- Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 Page 43 of 79 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Packet Pg. 502 3.D.d OR 4938 PG 2435 0 Exhibit D-1 Esplanade at Hacienda Lakes Legal Description Approved by HEX Decision 2014-18 Exbibit "A" HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES TRACT A A TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING BOUNDED AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE 4 INCH SQUARE CONCRETE MONUMENT REFERENCED IN FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION CERTIFIED CORNER RECORD NUMBER 84343 MARKING THE EAST ONE QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST; THENCE ALONG THE EAST -WEST ONE UARTER SECTION LINE OF SAID SECTION 23, SAID LINE BEING THE BASIS S DESCRIPTION, S.89"01'58"W., FOR 30.03 FEET ON WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF BENFIELD RO THE POINT OF ..'NING OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PARCEL; THENCE CONTINUING N F SECTION LINE, S.89001'58"W., FOR 1,298.4 N CAP LB 6990 MARKING THE NORTHEA RNER OF THE R NE QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE QUARTE AID SECTION ALONG THE EAST, SOUTH AND WEST LINES 0 ORTHEAST O TER OF THE NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER 0 QUARTER THE FOLLOWING THREE (3) COURSES: CT' - 1. THENCE S.01018'52"W., FOR 679.65 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD WITH CAP LB 6990 MARKING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER; 2. THENCE S.89022'00"W., FOR 663.28 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD WrM CAP LB 6990 MARKING THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER; 3. THENCE N.01 °14'38"E., FOR 675.75 FEET TO A 518" IRON ROD WITH CAP LB 6990 MARKING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER AND A POINT ON SAID EAST -WEST ONE QUARTER SECTION LINE; THENCE ALONG SAID EAST -WEST ONE QUARTER SECTION LINE S.89°01'58"W., FOR 664.25 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD WITH CAP LB 6990 MARKING THE CENTER OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID EAST -WEST ONE QUARTER SECTION LINE S.89°01'58"W., FOR 627.16 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD MARKING THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST ONE HALF OF THE EAST ONE HALF OF THE NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID EAST HALF N.01001'15"E., FOR 1,699.99 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE S.88°5845"E., FOR 445.48 FEET, Page 44 of 79 Packet Pg. 503 3.D.d OR 4938 PG 2436 U THENCE N.01001'15"E., FOR 400.00 FEET; U THENCE S.8805845"E., FOR 151.77 FEET; THENCE N.0100l'l5"E., FOR 457.04 FEET TO A POINT ON THE FUTURE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE FOR RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK ROAD EXTENSION AND A POINT ON A CURVE; THENCE ALONG SAID FUTURE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE THE FOLLOWING SIX (6) COURSES: 1. THENCE EASTERLY 268.58 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON -TANGENTIAL CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 949.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 16012'55" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS N.82044'27"E. FOR 267.68 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE; 2. THENCE EASTERLY 297.08 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A REVERSE CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 600.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 28022'07" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS N.88049'03"E. FOR 294.05 FEET TO A POINT OF COMP ; 3. THENCE EASTERLY 211.211 G T A COMPOUND CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RAD 1,040.00 A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 11038'09" AND BEING SUB A B S.71010'49"E. FOR 210.84 FEET TO A POINT 4. THENCE EASTERLY 54 .8 E CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A ANGLE OF 27000'44" AND BEING SUB ED BY A CHO S.78052'07"E. FOR 541.84 FEET; Q 5. THENCE N.87037'31 "E., FO FEET TO A PO NATURE; 6. THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY TC OF A TANGENTIAL CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RAWA8 W VTEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 9005722" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS S.46053'48"E. FOR 71.30 FEET TO A POINT ON THE FUTURE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF BENFIELD ROAD AND A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE; THENCE ALONG SAID FUTURE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE THE FOLLOWING FOUR (4) COURSES: 1. THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 955.48 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A REVERSE CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,160.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 47011'39" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS S.25°00'56"E. FOR 928.70 FEET; 2. THENCE S.4803646"E., FOR 641.57 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; 3. THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 909.05 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A TANGENTIAL CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,040.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 50004'53" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS S.23034'19"E. FOR 880.38 FEET; 4. THENCE S.01°28'07"W., FOR 239.01 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN. Page 45 of 79 Packet Pg. 504 3.D.d EXHIBIT E LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM LDC Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC Subsection 6.06.013, related to streets in subdivisions, that requires subdivisions to have platted road rights -of -way for streets, to allow private streets to be provided by separate access easements rather than platted road rights -of way. Deviation #2 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.04.04.B.5.c that limits the number of model homes, to allow one model home for each variant of the residential product proposed in the various phases or communities within the project. The number of model homes may exceed five for each phase or community within the project, but shall not exceed a total of 60 models for the entire MPUD development. Deviation #3 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02 to allow "boundary marker" signage on property corners fronting on existing, proposed, or future public roadways that provide access to the MPUD. The sign content area for "boundary markers" to be located in the Residential Tract R may be 15 feet in height rather than 8 feet in height as limited in LDC Subsection 5.06.02B.6.b. Deviation #4 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.C.2. that limits fence or wall heights to six (6') feet, to allow fences or walls to be no greater than eight (8') feet throughout the development. Where associated with existing or future public roadways, or Tract A, a 20 foot tall visual screen may be installed as a wall, berm, or wall/berm combination. Deviation #5 seeks relief from LDC Sections 4.02.13 G., and 4.06.02 CS., that requires a six foot tall opaque architecturally finished masonry wall, or berm, or combination thereof be provided around the boundaries of a business park. Buffering around the proposed Business Park Tract would be as required by the entirety of the referenced sections of the LDC, but the six foot wall, or berm, or combination thereof will not be required on the Business Park Tract along the frontage of Lord's Way. Deviation #6 seeks to allow one real estate sign in addition to the real estate signage permitted in LDC Section 5.06.02 B.2., that would be erected off -site from the Residential Tract, in the Commercial Tract. Deviation #7 The existing Swamp Buggy sign located in the southeast corner of Rattlesnake Hammock road and Collier Boulevard shall be allowed to remain in the present location until: the sign is relocated to allow the construction of the bridge to extend Rattlesnake Hammock Road, and/or a new sign can be permitted in Tract C. Deviation #8 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.05.04 D.1. that limits care unit Floor Area Ratio (FAR) to 0.45, to allow a care unit FAR of 0.60. Deviation #9 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.6, which allows two (2) ground or wall signs per entrance to a residential development with a maximum height of 8 feet, to allow for one (1) ground sign with a maximum height of 13 feet at the entrance to Esplanade at Hacienda Lakes as shown on Attachment E-2, Esplanade at Hacienda Lakes Entry Sign Location Map. [HEX 2014-181 Deviation #10 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.6, which allows for a maximum height of 8 feet for residential entry signs, to allow for a maximum sign height of 10 feet for residential entry signage at Azure at Hacienda Lakes as depicted on Exhibit E-3, Azure at Hacienda Lakes Primary Sign Plan Elevation Exhibit, Sheet 1 of 3, attached hereto. [HEX 2016-201 Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words st+ttsk thfough-are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: April 21, 2022 Page 46 of 79 Packet Pg. 505 3.D.d Deviation #11 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.6.b, which permits two (2) ground or wall signs per entrance to the development with a combined sign area of 64 square feet, to allow for one (1) total ground or wall sign with a maximum sign area of 80 square feet at the entrance to the Azure at Hacienda Lakes as depicted on Exhibit E-3, Azure at Hacienda Lakes Primary Sign Plan Elevation Exhibit, Sheet 1 of 3, attached hereto. [HEX 2016-201 Deviation #12 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.J, which prohibits dead-end streets, to allow one (1) dead-end street at the terminus of a local street within the Azure at Hacienda Lakes residential development, as depicted on Exhibit E-3, Sign Location Map, Sheet 3 of 3, attached hereto. [HEX 2016-201 Deviation #13 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.05.02.F, which requires that off-street parking must be arranged so that no motor vehicles have to back onto any street, excluding single-family and two-family residential dwellings and churches, to allow for back out parking from the proposed off-street parking for multi -family dwellings within the Azure at Hacienda Lakes residential development, as depicted on Exhibit B-2, attached hereto. [HEX 2016-201 _Deviation #14 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.6, which allows for a maximum height of 8 feet for residential entry signs, to allow for a maximum sign height of 12 feet for residential entry si ng a Hacienda Lakes — North Area as depicted on Exhibit E-4, Hacienda Lakes — North Area Sign Deviation Exhibit, Sheet 2 of 2, attached hereto. Deviation #15 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.6.b, which permits two (2) ground or wall signs per entrance to the development with a combined sign area of 64 square feet, to allow for two (2) ground or wall signs that are 64 square feet each. which include signage for each of the residential developments which share access to Collier Boulevard at the entrance to the Hacienda Lakes — North Area, as depicted on Exhibit E_-4 Hacienda Lakes — North Area Sign Deviation Exhibit, Sheet 1 of 2, attached hereto. This deviation is subject to conditions that secondargnage is specifically for the two "R" Tract properties labeled "Future Development" that are immediately fronting and adjacent to the intersection of the entry road with Collier Boulevard, and no other si nage for these two "R" Tract properties is permitted facing Collier Boulevard. Deviation #16 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.13.14, which allows boundary marker signs to be a maximum of 24 square feet to allow for two boundary marker signs with a maximum of 32 square feet at the Hacienda Lakes — North Area, as depicted on Exhibit EA Hacienda Lakes — North Area Sign Deviation Exhibit, Sheet 1 of 2, attached hereto. Deviation #17 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.J, which prohibits dead-end streets except when designed as a cul-de-sac, to allow one (1) dead-end street at the terminus of a local street within the Hacienda Lakes —North Area residential development, as depicted on Exhibit EA Hacienda Lakes —North Area Sign Deviation Exhibit, Sheet 1 of 2, attached hereto. Deviation #18 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02, which requires landscape buffers to separate developments, to allow for no buffer along the northern PUD boundary in either or both of the following circumstances: 1) West of the FPL easement if the abutting properties are rezoned or amended to provide for a unified development plan of the northern property (currently Agriculture -zoned property) and the Hacienda Lakes - North Area properties prior to approval of an SDP or PPL; 2) East of the FPL easement if the abutting property to the north (currently Willow Run RPUD) is rezoned to provide for no adjacent buffer, as depicted on Exhibit C-2, attached hereto. Hacienda Lakes MPUD PL20210001791 Last Revised: April 21, 2022 Words striisk thr-augh-are deleted; Words underlined are added Page 47 of 79 Packet Pg. 506 3.D.d Deviation #19 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.C.2 which permits a maximum fence/wall height of 6 feet in residential zoning districts, to instead allow for a decorative wall with maximum height of 14 feet in the location shown on Exhibit C-2, attached hereto. Hacienda Lakes MPUD PL20210001791 Last Revised: April 21, 2022 Words str-uek thfetigh-are deleted; Words underlined are added Page 48 of 79 Packet Pg. 507 3.D.d Approved by HEX Decision 2014-18 ATTACHMENT E-1 ESPLANADE AT HACIENDA LAKES PROJECT LOCATION MAP PDI-PL2014-0000973 Exhibit B Page 3 of 4 ■ Packet Pg. 508 3.D.d a� Y J Approved by HEX Decision 2014-18 ATTACHMENT E-2 f: ESPLANADE AT HACIENDA LAKES ENTRY SIGN LOCATION MAP PDI-PL2O14-O000973 ENTRY IGN Sa _ ---- --- ._.. RATTLESNAKE � RATTlf -�µM^ HAMMOCK RD'��~ :1� M to r 04 LO ............ ...+`� • 1..... .. '2 04 ......... ............. Exhibit B --Page, 4 of 4 Packet Pg. 509 3.D.d Approved by HEX Decision 2016-20 Exhibit "1" - Page 0 OT / .mF+wi�ww.swa.i Deno ► iO 1:137NS �P'�ICarBSYt030Ri13"lld W l09U levels VIP= 'm Sue • LAM ZWWWD vmu Golu S2IMi ONO 1101 I I 9N1U N19N3 ZIOd ag"J"d i I 4 I N0IiVA3-M T NV1d N0IS AULN3 AVVMd f 30 1 I33HS 'E-3116IMS-S Y'll VQN310VH 1V 3111f1ZV S1N3WWOO A.LNnOO ONV 1N'lM3lDd 43SI1131i + BMPE SiT13WW0 AINnooQNV LN3no Had 0361A3H BNll2 gin L2l « 03111WSns-0OA3H S A' � w ,N p E:la � 1 W r v6 d ► � x Ct � � w c� I c`n+r' C z i a w Fr a s's 6tn 7. a� 0Mp•u01S-esng-KO LOg kZ-old )iA unO111g14Q u0114-0 u01S tilu3 L03.00 9 (—a mi — saxel epuepeW 00-9L v Packet Pg. 510 .a. . _ IDA Approved by HEX Decision 2016-20 Exhibit "l" Page 6 of 7 J R C R 2 d M O O r O O M N O N J d LO T" Co O N EXHIBIT E-3, SHEET 2 OF 3 AZURE AT HACIENDA LAKES EXHIBIT LOCATION MAP SECTION: TOWNSHIP. RANGE: ^°"°"�"'G`n°'"°^""'^^°""�" ENGINEERING PREPARED FOR: 14,23,24 50S 26E °M16EN0 W% 0 I KM-0I V$F*M "OW TOLL BROTHERS. AMERICASCOLLIER COUNTY, LUXURY FLORDA uioowwAwwn FL34wneaee FILENAME: 5T801E050I.dwg q� ��ysµu&76" SHFE F: 3 OF 4 Packet Pg. 511 3.D.d Approved by HEX Decision 2016-20 Exhibit "1" y7 of 7 III Z M QLLJ� o rn O F Y aaW J x a C PQ 82 98 d Y }~ � W h- Z�`� 2XX W z M LL 'Z^ V O a(n� r\ RUN' i iy ry ..... y �y y �� ty�,yKyt�ryry�"� �! R� R� . iR� . , a M 0 CO 0 0 M N O N J a 0 "V WMA oLWATA e.rtota�aoha�wa w+.o�wPe7 uo_ot uqy mroo'c4*A� I.ae wi -wn.o■o•.D aov�v.r Packet Pg. 512 3.D.d n fr I BOUNDARY MARKER (32 SF) FUTURE DEVELOPMENT ENTRY SIGN p ¢ ENTRY SIGN (64 SF) I v 1 DEVELOPMENT FUTURE t, i I MARKER _ _ SF) -PROPERTY BOUNDARY, TYPICAL n UREJ V E2, AMENITY CENTER� U 4 UJtE G � I—E 1 iArcE 0 ROAD CONECTION EXHIBIT E-4, HACIENDA LAKES - NORTH AREA SIGN DEVIATION EXHIBIT, SHEET I OF 2 ACCESS EASEMENT PROPOSED DEAD-END STREET (MAX. 150') a� Y J cC C N cC 2 a M 0 O O M N 0 N J Lo O N Packet Pg. 513 3.D.d ACCENT - WA LL OR PLANTER 10• EXHIBIT 38' ACCENT WALL (lr.Wo./doNEl 2Y TOTAL SIGN AREA S/ SF .._M �___.�___.__.._........ ((22) $ECECONOMYNNAE.1]SF) HACIENDA, NORTH I I NORTH__ J L------- - — — _ I SECONDARY NAME I 12' ' 9ECONDMY NAME L-- - - - - - - ---J 12' j—� SIGN ACCENT WALL SION AREA 32 SF r-----------i IHACIENDAl- WALL OR i NORTH PLANTER 12' 15' 3NDA LAKES - NORTH AREA SIGN DEVIATION EXHIBIT, SHEET 2 m Y R J R C R 2 M O r 0 0 M N 0 N J ui r 0 rn Packet Pg. 514 3.D.d EXHIBIT F LIST OF OWNER COMMITMENTS For the purposes of this PUD, the owner commitments set forth below are applicable to Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC, its successors, and/or assigns. The owner commitments below shall not be enforceable upon Swamp Buggy Days, Inc., nor Collier County Junior Deputies League, Inc. LEGAL A. Access to Parcel "A", as described in Exhibit D of this document and is not a part of this MPUD shall be accessible via a new roadway easement from Owner that shall be recorded in the public records of Collier County, and shall run in a north -south direction from the existing thirty-foot roadway easement recorded in O.R. Book 857, Page 1800. This easement shall be recorded within 90-days of approval of this PUD. B. Access to Parcel "B", as described in Exhibit D of this document and is not a part of this MPUD shall be accessible via the existing roadway and ingress/egress easements recorded in O.R. Book 271, Page 505, O.R. Book 622, Page 1609, O.R. Book 245, Page 124, and O.R. Book 287, Page 18. C. No existing public access/roadway easements shall be vacated to preclude access to off -site private and public lands without providing replacement access easements. This new roadway easement shall be equivalent to the existing easement and shall be recorded concurrently with the vacation. II ENVIRONMENTAL A. Native vegetation shall be preserved in this MPUD in accordance with the table below: Hacienda Lakes Native Preserve Summary Description Total Urban ac Rural ac Project Area 2262.14 625.07 1637.07 On -Site Native Ve etation 1721.97 295.38 1426.69 Less the Native Veg Within Rattlesnake Hammock Ext. 2.02 2.02 0.00 Less the Native Veg Within The Lords Way Ext. 0.42 0.42 0.00 Less the Native Veg Within the Benfield Road Corridor 12.91 5.01 7.90 Less the Native Veg Within Archaeological Preserves 6.07 1.06 5.02 Native Vegetation For Requirement Calculations 1700.54 286.87 1413.67 Percentage for required Native Preserve - 25% ` Required Native Vegetation* <921.09 71.71 <849.38 Preserved Native Vegetation `" 1395.35 40.81 1352.57 Compensating Native Preserve 2x URF Deficit)" 61.80 Total Preserve Area 1 1544.14 53.06 1491.08 Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 56 of 79 Packet Pg. 515 3.D.d " Native Preserve Requirement (LDC Subsection 2.05.02.B.2.g.ii.) of 90% within the RFMUD Sending Lands exceeds 60% of the total project RFMUD Sending Lands. Therefore, over 60% of the total project RFMUD Sending Lands shall be the required Rural native vegetation area. ** Compliance with LDC Subsection 3.05.07 H.1.a., requires native vegetation planting enhancement of a minimum of 12.24 acres of the project's URF Subdistrict Preserve Tract. Compliance with 100% of the native vegetation preservation requirement shall be achieved through preserving RFMUD project native vegetation in an amount two times the deficient native vegetation preserve acreage in the URF Subdistrict project lands as is provided for through the adopted GMP amendment. B. A Wetland Mitigation/Monitoring plan is to be submitted once approved from SFWMD, for County review. C. The MPUD shall be developed in accordance with the Wildlife Habitat Management Plan accepted by Collier County as contained in the Environmental Impact Statement. D. An updated listed species survey for the future development areas shall be submitted prior to the next development order approval. E. Installation of the Sabal Palm Road culvert crossings and spreader swales shall occur prior to the first preliminary acceptance. III ENGINEERING A. A SFWMD ROW permit will be required for widening the bridge at Rattlesnake Hammock/951 over the Henderson Creek Canal. IV ARCHAEOLOGICAL and HISTORIC RESOURCES A. The five archaeological sites identified within the Hacienda Lakes parcel are denoted AP, Archaeological Preserve on Sheets 3 -12 in the MPUD Master Plan Set. These sites must remain undeveloped. A public access easement around the archaeological sites for potential digs and further study has been provided. Disturbance to these five protected archaeological sites may only occur with County approval and approval of the State Division of Historical Resources, and any disturbance shall only be permitted under the direct supervision of a qualified archaeologist. B. Historical/archeological areas are not used to meet preserve requirements because if an archaeological dig is required, then native vegetation would have to be removed. V EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES A. In order to mitigate for the project impacts and demand on Emergency Medical Services (EMS), the developer shall provide a one acre parcel to Collier County. This public facility site is identified as "PF" on the MPUD Master Plan (Exhibit Q. The dedication of the one acre site shall be by deed to Collier County and is subject to an Emergency Medical Services Impact Fee credit based on the fair market value of the donated property. The valuation of the one acre site dedication has been determined to be $30,000 per acre, for the purposes of the Emergency Medical Services Impact Fee credit, and the conveyance shall occur no later than at the time the 5001" residential unit is included in a development order request (site development plan, or plat), subsequent to the adoption of the DRI Development Order. If Owner conveys to County mitigated land for the real property conveyances described in this paragraph, then Owner shall be entitled to an EMS impact fee credit for the value of the Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 BCC Approved 10/25/1 l Page 57 of 79 Packet Pg. 516 3.D.d mitigation, as a cost of construction for public facilities. The value of the mitigation shall be a per acre value calculated at the total cost of state and federal mitigation of the environmental impacts including wetland and wildlife impacts divided by the impacted acreage of 718 acres. Developer shall provide documentation acceptable to the County to verify this cost. The total cost of State and Federal mitigation includes land costs for onsite preserves used for mitigation, environmental permitting costs, exotic removal, enhancement of preservation lands, creation of wildlife habitat, hydrological improvements and any mitigation activity required in the Army Corps of Engineers permit and South Florida Water Management District permit for the project in order to address the project's mitigation. State and Federal mitigation does not include County required mitigation. In lieu of EMS impact fee credits for environmental mitigation, the County reserves the right to transfer to Developer or Owner County -owned State or Federal panther and wetlands credits equal to the value of the EMS impact fee credits calculated pursuant to this paragraph. VI TRANSPORTATION For the purposes of the following commitments, it must be understood that the property was divided into three main areas: North area being north of The Lord's Way extension; South area being south of Rattlesnake Hammock Road plus School; Benfield Road Improvements. The South area commitments shall be constructed in a sequential manner. However, the rest of the commitments are not sequential and can be accomplished in no specific order. Similarly, the three areas identified above are not required to be developed in a sequential manner. SOUTH AREA The Owner shall construct (here forward to mean "constructed to meet minimum County requirements for acceptance"), at its sole expense without road impact fee credits, the initial two lanes (south side) of Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension from C.R.951 to Florida Power Line Easement (approximately 0.25 miles). In addition, the Owner shall construct the Collier Boulevard/Rattlesnake Hammock Road intersection interim geometry as shown in Figure 1, below and to improve the bridge on Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension over the canal to the interim geometry as shown in Figure 1, below. Upon completion (here forward to mean "completed construction to County minimum requirements, and reserved for future conveyance to the County at the County's request.") of all of such improvements, the Owner shall be allowed to develop up to 327,500 square feet of Retail Land Uses, or Residential Pod A, or some combination of the two land uses. However, the total number of gross trips to be generated by this portion of development shall not exceed 1,409 PM peak hour trips. In the event that Residential Pod A is developed, access to Pod A will be either an internal private roadway or via an extension of Rattlesnake Hammock Road to the entrance of Pod A. These improvements and the areas allowed to develop upon completion of these improvements are depicted in Figure 1, below. All of these improvements are site related improvements. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 58 of 79 Packet Pg. 517 3.D.d 11. The Owner shall construct, at its own expense and without road impact fee credits, Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension from Florida Power Line Easement to the road leading into Swamp Buggy grounds (approximately 0.25 miles) and improve the bridge on Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension over the canal to the final geometry as shown is Figure 2, below. These improvements are site related improvements. Upon completion of -such-improvement,-the-Owner-shalt-be allowed-to--develop-the--foitowing additional land uses: 20,000 Square Feet of General Office, and; 50,000 Square Feet of Medical Office, and; 135 Room Hotel, and; Remaining portion of the 327,500 Square Feet of Retail (if applicable pursuant to Commitment 1), and; Remaining portion of Residential Pod A (if applicable pursuant to Commitment 1), and; Required residential uses within Activity Center land use; Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 Approved CCPC Consent - Rev. 09/ 15/ 11 Page 59 of 79 Packet Pg. 518 3.D.d These improvements and the area allowed to develop upon completion of these improvements are depicted in Figure 2, below. Figure 2 - NadeMa Lakes DIG . Commitment If 11* lid Existing Lanes/Turn lanes _1L lanes/Turn lanes to be Constructed/ReconttrWed ■ •� Roadway Segment Previously Constructed —� Roadway Segment to be Constructed — �...� Area Previously Developed Area to be Developed Potential Area to be Developed J Y, Rattksn* Hammock R ensl .. _ Residential l ` • Pod A \ /-- � s ir Florida Power line Easement III. The Owner shall construct, at its sole expense, Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension from the road leading into Swamp Buggy grounds to the future Benfield Road as a two lane road, including construction of the Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension at Benfield Road intersection. Upon completion of such improvement, the Owner shall be allowed to develop the following additional land uses: 919 Student Elementary School, and; Residential Pod B. Since only a portion of the capacity to be provided by this two lane section will be consumed by the Hacienda Lakes PUD, the Owner shall receive road impact fee credits equal to 50% of the cost of this improvement. The cost of this improvement will be determined at the time Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/ 11 Page 60 of 79 Packet Pg. 519 3.D.d of construction, and shall include the fair market value of the land or easement when the Owner conveys the road right of way to the County, free and clear of liens and encumbrances. Fair market value has been determined to be $30,000 per acre. This improvement and the area allowed to develop upon completion of this improvement are depicted in Figure 3, below. Fifty percent (50%) of the cost of this improvement is deemed a site -related improvement. NORTH AREA IV. With no improvement other than a bridge to be constructed by the Owner, at its sole cost and without road impact fee credit, over the water canal that runs parallel to C.R.951 at the northern project site access, the Owner shall be allowed to develop Residential Pod C (not to exceed 300 PM peak hour trips at the connection to C.R.951). This improvement and the area allowed to develop upon completion of this improvement are depicted in Figure 4, below. At no time will the County accept ownership of this bridge. This improvement is a site related improvement. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-A R- 10 146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/11 Page 61 of 79 Packet Pg. 520 3.D.d V. The Owner shall, at its sole expense and without road impact fee credits, complete the reconstruction of The Lord's Way from C.R.951 to Florida Power Line Easement and construct the extension of The Lord's Way from Florida Power Line Easement to the west entrance to the Business Park with a two lane undivided cross section. In addition, when the Collier Boulevard at The Lord's Way intersection is signalized upon meeting warrants, the cost of the signalization of this intersection will be shared proportionately among the Owner and other developments located in the area (east and west of C.R.951) and at no cost to Collier County and without road impact fee credits. These improvements are site -related improvements. Upon completion of such road improvement, the Owner shall be allowed to develop the following additional land uses: Business Park, and; Residential Pod D. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/11 Page 62 of 79 Packet Pg. 521 3.D.d These improvements and the area allowed to develop upon completion of these improvements are depicted in Figure 5, below. Flaure S — Hacienda lakes DRI - Commitment V Florida Power line Easement Residential Pad C i Residential Pod 0 Thttord's Wa J _ Rattlesnake mock R Residential i Residential Pod B 1 Pod A {� Existing Lanes/Turn lanes lanev Turn lanes to be constructed/Reconstructed Roadway Segment Previously Constructed Roadway Segment to be Constructed Area Previously Developed Area to be Developed When the DRI has received certificates of occupancy for 66 percent of the total commercial and residential development authorized by the DRI, Collier County will perform an evaluation and inform the Owner if it is necessary to convey road right of way to the County for the section of The Lord's Way Extension from the west entrance to the Business Park/School to Benfield Road. If Collier County requests the road right of way, the Owner shall convey by road easement to the County the needed road right of way up to a width of 60 feet, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances, and shall receive impact fee credits equal to 100 percent of the fair market value of the road easement conveyed to the County which has been determined to be $30,000 per acre. No further certificates of occupancy shall be issued until the road easement conveyance is recorded in the public records of Collier County. If this segment of The Lord's Way is not deemed necessary (through documentation, or lack thereof, in the LRTP or the CIE) by the time the development achieves 66 percent of the total approved development quantities, this commitment shall be consider�cLexpired-._._. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 Approved CCPC Consent - Rev. 09/15/11 Page 63 of 79 Packet Pg. 522 3.D.d BENFIELD ROAD IMPROVEMENTS VI. The Owner shall construct, at its sole expense Benfield Road from Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension to the entrance of Residential Pod E with a two lane undivided cross section and reserve the right of way necessary for the final 4 lane divided cross section. Residential Pod E shall be connected in a consistent manner with the County's right of way reservation plans or construction plans for future Benfield Road sections. Upon completion of such improvement and acceptance by Collier County of the improvements, the Owner shall convey to the County a road easement for the road right of way needed for this section of Benfield Road up to a width of 120 feet, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances. Upon recordation of the road easement in the public records of Collier County, the Owner shall receive road impact fee credits for 50% of the fair market value of the road easement necessary for this section of Benfield Road and for 100% of the increase in cost resulting from the construction of the road according to County Standards (arterial) instead of as a local subdivision road. The fair market value of 50% of the conveyance of the road right of way easement to the County has been determined to be $30,000 per acre. Fifty percent (50%) of the fair market value of the road right of way easement and the total cost of the improvements are site -related improvements. The Cost of this improvement will be determined at the time of construction. Upon completion of such improvement, the Owner shall be allowed to develop the following additional land uses: Residential Pod E. These improvements and the area allowed to develop upon completion of this improvement are depicted in Figure 6, below. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 64 of 79 Packet Pg. 523 3.D.d — Florida Para Line Easement Rfsld@ntW i Pod C — Pod 0 Resider" Pod E Rattlesnay Hammock ,v r ResldettlHl ` .i R Ibd d I Pad {P Ews" unes/fum ones ` 1*160wn Law a Lobe Comtructed/Recoostructeo — Roadway See, Wo 1 Preaously Constructed Roadway Sepnent to be Constructed Area Pr*%4-4 y Dvvrioped l i Area to be Desaloped VII. Benfield Road South of Rattlesnake Hammock Extension and north of Residential Pod E connection to Benfield Road: the Owner will convey right of way to Collier County by road easement for Benfield Road on areas not to be built by Owner up to a width of 120 feet, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances. Upon such conveyance, Collier County will provide road impact fees credits for 100% of the fair market value of the road easement. The value of the right of way has been determined to be $30,000 per acre. The area to be conveyed is depicted in Figure 7, below, Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 Approved CCPC Consent— Rev. 09/15/11 Page 65 of 79 Packet Pg. 524 3.D.d Florida Power Line Easement RetfdeRtiel i _ ` y �; Pod C OK ! Resden" Pod G Residential Pod E Thetord's RattlesnalK Residential rode � ;i Pod A E 3410e Uneourn Lanes __ .. .... L LMWVTum Laren to be Constructed/Reconstructed Roadway seernent t+veaoustr Constructed annom RoOt of Way to be ►reserved Area Prevwu* Developed Area to be Developed VIII. Benfield Road South of Sabal Palm Road: the Owner shall convey by road easement to the County the right of way needed for the future construction of Benfield Road south of Sabal Palm Road (approximately 1.00 mile) up to a width of 120 feet free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and at no expense to the County. In addition, the Owner shall receive no impact fee credits for such right of way conveyance. This is a site -related improvement. The area to be dedicated is depicted in Figure 8, below. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/11 Page 66 of 79 Packet Pg. 525 3.D.d IX. As a part of its State and Federal permits, the Owner shall pay for mitigation required for State and or Federal environmental impacts arising from the permitting for portions of Benfield Road described in Commitments VI and VII. In addition to this commitment, the Owner shall at no cost to County either: (1) Convey drainage easement(s) to the County for their stormwater management facility needs free and clear of all liens and encumbrances, or (2) agree to accept stormwater from Benfield Road into the Project's stormwater management system. These are site -related contributions. X. At two thresholds during construction of this DRI, the Owner shall provide to Collier County a transportation analysis which compares the value of the Owner's contribution to the County's public road network against the DRI's proportionate share, (as defined in the State of Florida's HB 7207) of which this DRI impacts County and State road segments. If Owner's contribution is less than its impact based on the transportation analysis, then Owner shall pay to County the difference in three installments starting 90 days after the transportation analysis is agreed to by both parties, and then each 90 days thereafter until paid in full. The transportation contribution by the Developer shall be defined as the sum of all road impact fees paid to date, the costs of the non site -related transportation Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/11 Page 67 of 79 Packet Pg. 526 3.D.d improvements (those receiving road impact fee credits) on Rattlesnake Hammock Road, Benfield Road and the Lords Way, plus the value of any road right-of-way conveyance by donation to the County unless otherwise calculated as an impact fee credit. The first transportation analysis shall be submitted to the County when 33% of approved development trips (1,109 total gross trips) have been permitted based on building permit issuance, without projecting forward growth. The second transportation analysis will be submitted when 66% of the approved development trips (2,219 total gross trips) have been permitted based on building permit issuance, with a projection toward build out. The second analysis and reconciliation will finalize any transportation related assessments owed by the Developer for the build out of the Project. With the annual PUD monitoring report, Developer shall provide an annual trip generation analysis of trips approved by Site Development Plan approval and building permit issuance compared to total trips approved within the DRI. Upon triggering 33% or 66% as described above, Developer shall submit the transportation analysis described in this paragraph within six months. No certificates of occupancy shall be issued until the traffic analysis and annual trip generation analysis required by this paragraph and any payments due have been delivered to County, unless the BCC grants an extension. XI. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the first 75,000 square feet of retail land uses, the Owner shall construct, at its sole expense, a Collier Area Transit (CAT) stop/shelter fronting the Commercial Tract C that shall include a 10'x 20' pavilion shelter with benches and protection from the elements, and include a minimum of three (3) bike racks. Owner shall be responsible for maintenance of the bus stop/shelter unless Owner elects to convey to County at no cost to County an easement for the bus shelter. The location of the CAT shelter is generally depicted below on the Master Mobility Plan. This is a site -related contribution. XII. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the first 70,000 square feet of business park land uses, or prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for a school or educational facility in the Business Park Tract, the Owner shall construct, at its sole expense, a Collier Area Transit (CAT) stop/shelter fronting the Business Park Tract BP that shall include a 10'x 20' pavilion shelter with benches and protection from the elements, and include a minimum of three (3) bike racks. Owner shall be responsible for maintenance of the bus stop/shelter unless Owner elects to convey to County at no cost to County an easement for the bus shelter. The location of the CAT shelter is generally depicted below on the Master Mobility Plan. This is a site -related contribution. XIII. DRI traffic studies identified an off -site impact at the interchange of I-75 and S.R. 951 Ramps Intersection, specifically in the left -turn movement serving the northbound S.R. 951 to westbound (northbound) I-75 turning movement. Assessments of this operation in 2011 indicate that changes to lane usage and signage could augment the acceptable operation of the intersection and delay the impacts of the DRI. Hacienda Lakes traffic becomes significant (exceeds five percent of service volume) at this location at 46.2 percent of site traffic generation. When the first transportation analysis required under subsection X above is undertaken (e.g. at 33 percent of site traffic generation), the existing traffic flow and level of service at this location will be reviewed and projected to the build -out of the DRI. If the 2011 operational assessment is confirmed and the intersection is, or will be, operating at an unacceptable level of service as determined by County or FDOT, then the Developer will identify a solution to offset its impacts and/or restore acceptable operating conditions, and contribute its proportionate share, per subsection X above, of the cost of the improvement to the appropriate government agency. If a proportionate share payment is identified as needed, the owner shall receive road impact fee credits for 100 percent of this contribution. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 BCC Approved 10125/1 t Page 68 of 79 Packet Pg. 527 3.D.d XIV. If Owner conveys to County mitigated land for the real property conveyances that are eligible for impact fee credits described in Subsections III, V, VI and VI1 of this Article VI, Transportation, then Owner shall be entitled to a transportation impact fee credit for the value of the State and Federal environmental mitigation, as a cost of construction for public facilities. The value of the mitigation shall be a per acre value calculated at the total cost of state and federal mitigation of the environmental impacts including wetland and wildlife impacts divided by the impacted acreage of 718 acres. The total cost of State and Federal mitigation includes land costs for onsite preserves used for mitigation, environmental permitting costs, exotic removal, enhancement of preservation lands, creation of wildlife habitat, hydrological improvements and any mitigation activity required in the Army Corps of Engineers permit and South Florida Water Management District permit for the project in order to address the project's mitigation. State and Federal mitigation does not include County required mitigation. Developer shall provide documentation acceptable to the County to verify this cost. In lieu of transportation impact fee credits for environmental mitigation, the County reserves the right to transfer to Developer or Owner County -owned State or Federal panther and wetlands credits equal to the value of the transportation impact fee credits calculated pursuant to this Subsection XIV. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 69 of 79 Packet Pg. 528 3.D.d 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 tin m 1 z u 1 1 1 a � 1 J 1 1 1 � Legend Land Use eCAT STOPISHELTER ® Attraction Tract --- Proposed CAT Route 4A & 4B Extension - Business Park or School Existing CAT Route 4A & 48 Comrwrcial 0 Existing CAT Facility 4A Preserve Tract (Q, Existing CAT Facility 48 Public Facilidas Tract (EMS) - Existing CAT Route 7 Junior Deputy Proposed Pedestrian FaHlibos - School -- Existing Shared Use Path Residential Tract OProjoct Boundary Residential / Medical Use ODevelopment Boundary Public ROW Reservation W J J 1 XISTING CAT 1 ROUTE 7 (TO CO ISLAND) Proposed \ Access I 1 DEVELOPER 1 PROPOSED CAT 1 STOPISHELTER THE LORD'S WAY 1 POTENTIAL 1 CAT STOP/SHELTER 1 PROPOSED 1 4A&4BCAT 1 ROUTE EXTENSION 1 DEVELOPER 1 Proposed Access PROPOSED 1 CAT STOP/SHELTER 1 RATTLESNAKE I PROP. RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCKIIIIIHAMMOCK RD. EXT. 11 EXISTING j CAT ROUTE 4A y 1 Q EXISTIN EXISTING 'EXISTING CAT CAT CAT FAC TY FACILITY ROUTE 4A 4 YP) 4B (TYP) & 4B -- HadendalAkes Master Ull Plan 19fpdated 08/27/20 lb Pedestrian Facilities WIII Be Extended Aloag All Internal Roads Even if Not St 500 t 000 A� A POTENNAL CAT STOPISRELTER Padoslrl acllltles Will Be ExtenQ Along All Internal Roads E an If Not Shown STATE LANDS MAIN' i `Y r1 .1• Prererca 6Y: rMoneo PMnq dale: Oebbw e.I010 Fxa: T!rhq.clWt005N5 Or50.02.07 HnticrNr.aYeslGMf^Rt^ATTrrnY11MP m.0 Page 70 of 79 Packet Pg. 529 3.D.d Legend Land Use CAT STOPISHELTER - Attraction Tract --- Proposed CAT Route 4A & 46 Extension - Business Park or School �• Existing CAT Route 4A & 48 Commercial Existing CAT Facility 4A - Preserve Tract Existing CAT Facility 48 Pudic Facilidos Tract (EMS) Existing CAT Route 7 Junior Deputy Proposed Pedestrian Facilities - School •• Existing Shared Use Path Residential Tract QProject Boundary - Residential I Medical Use QDevelopment Boundary Public ROW Reservation W 3 J u I EXISTING CAT Proposed , ROUTE 7 Access �(TO MARCOISLAND) I Proposed, I Access I I I � DEVELOPER PROPOSED CAT STOP/SHELTER HACIENDA LAKES PKWY .i •ads. POTENTIAL CAT STOPISHELTER' PROPOSED 4A & 4B CAT ROUTE EXTENSION DEVELOPER Proposed PROPOSED Access ; /CAT STOPISHELTER RATTLESNAKE PROP. RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK Rn HAMMOCK RD. EXT. I I EXISTING i j CAT ROUTE 4A r / 1 tp� �! l EXISTING\ EXISTIN 07EXISTING CAT CAT CAT FACILITY FACILITY ROUTE 4A 4A (TYP) 413(TYP) &48, Hacienda Lakes Master Mobility Plan (REVISED (0112012022) Pedestrian Facilities WIII Be Extended Along All Internal Roads Even if Not Shown PA[cekr POTENTIAL CAT STOPISHELTER Pedostrld�I ecilltlec Will Bc Extenq Alonp All Internal Roads E en If Not Shown STATE LANDS DIVA �., PnpbeO By: rnl— PMip0a o""e. WI0 Fke: TIRpix I02005x15 DIM 02.01 H 1[rMnLxkmIGMPRCMTiren�IMP.maE Page 71 of 79 ly Y R J R C 2 0 2 d M O r O O M N O N J (L 1141) O C0 Packet Pg. 530 3.D.d VII PUBLIC UTILITIES A. Per the current 2008 Water and Sewer Master Plan Update, the majority area of this project is located within the Collier County Water -Sewer District Boundary; there are some areas of this project that currently are outside of the Collier County Water & Sewer District Boundary. The areas that are not part of Collier County Water -Sewer District also do not belong to any other Water -Sewer District. Since Public Utilities can provide service as requested by this project, Impact Fees will be applied to the entire area to be developed. B. The project shall connect to the CCWSD potable water system at a location to be determined by the CCWSD when capacity is available. C. The project shall connect to the CCWSD wastewater collection and conveyance system at a location determined by CCWSD, when capacity is available. D. This future development is located on the zone of the existing South Hawthorn Wellfield for the wellfield-SCRWTP expansion to 20 MGD. The Rules and Regulations for protection of well fields shall be followed. All well sites and pipeline easements located on and close to this development needs to be shown on all future site development plans, PPL or any other site plans applications. VIII PLANNING A. Prior to the issuance of the first residential Development Order in the Hacienda Lakes MPUD, the Base TDR Credits and Early Entry TDR Bonus Credits shall be severed and redeemed from all Sending Lands to be preserved within one mile of the Urban Residential Fringe and the filing of executed Limitation of Development Rights Agreement(s) shall occur for these same lands. B. A permanent conservation mechanism, including Limitation of Development Rights Agreement(s), [shall] be attached/applied to all Sending Lands to be preserved beyond one mile of the Urban Residential Fringe prior to final approval of the first Site Development Plan (SDP) for the Hacienda Lakes project. IX SWAMP BUGGY DAYS RECREATION AND SPORTS PARK PUD GENERAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS The following commitments shall only apply to the Attraction and Junior Deputy Tracts: General Provisions A. All motor racing shall normally be limited to weekends and holidays. No motor racing or practice will commence earlier than 9:00 a.m. and all racing shall be completed no later than 1 1:00 P.M. B. The shooting and archery ranges shall meet accepted design standards regarding safety and shall be operated and maintained in accordance with accepted safe practices. For security and safety, access to the shooting and archery range areas shall be limited by fencing or other suitable barriers. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 72 of 79 Packet Pg. 531 3.D.d C. Fencing and/or other suitable barriers will be provided on the site by the Owner for security, safety, and traffic control. Roadways and Traffic A. Roadways within the subject property shall be private roadways and shall be maintained by the Owner. Therefore, said roadways shall be constructed and surfaced in accordance with accepted practices and as permitted by the County Engineer. B. For special events such as the Swamp Buggy races, and as deemed necessary by the County Sheriff, the Owner will arrange for special traffic control at the intersection of the main entrance road with CR 951 and Rattlesnake Hammock Road. Utilities and Service Facilities A. The potable water supply source for the project shall be the County regional water system (now known as the Collier County Water Sewer District). B. Permanent sanitary facilities shall be provided for everyday use by administrative and other personnel. Treatment and disposal of wastewater from said facilities shall be by septic tank/drainfield, or as otherwise permitted by Florida Administrative Code and approved by the appropriate local and/or State regulatory agencies. C. Sanitary facilities for spectators and participants at scheduled events shall consist of portable toilets (provided by a licensed commercial service), or permanent restroom facilities, or both. Wastewater from any permanent facilities provided for spectator use shall be stored in a buried holding tank of suitable capacity and subsequently removed and disposed of offsite by a licensed commercial service; or as otherwise permitted by Florida Administrative Code and approved by the appropriate local and/or State regulatory agencies. D. Onsite water well or wells may be constructed (as permitted) for flooding of the Swamp Buggy track and other non -potable uses. X DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT A. One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD and DRI monitoring until close-out of the PUD and DR[, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD/DRI commitments until close-out of the PUD and DRI. At the time of this PUD approval, the Managing Entity is Hacienda Lakes of Naples LLC. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD and DRI by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 Page 73 of 79 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Packet Pg. 532 3.D.d Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD and DRI are closed -out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD and DRI commitments. CP\ I 0-CPS-01024\ 119 Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 74 of 79 Packet Pg. 533 3.D.d EXHIBIT HACIENDA LAKES PUD MASTER USE AND CONVERSION LIST FOR SDP / PLAT / BUILDING PERMITS APPROVED USES (including square footages) APPROVED RESIDENTIAL USES (SDP & PLAT & BUILDING PERMIT) TOTAL RESIDENTIAL MULTI -FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY MANDATED OR PROJECT DATE PERMIT # DISTRICT UNITS RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL NON -MANDATED TOTAL NOTE: IF BUILDING DUPLEX ON ONE LOT, ADD SECOND UNIT AT BUILDING PERMIT APPROVED COMMERCIAL USES IN GROSS FLOOR AREA (SDPs) TOTAL TOTAL PROJECT DATE PERMIT # DISTRICT RETAIL OFFICE TOTAL BP HOTEL TOTAL 1 of 5 Page 75 of 79 Packet Pg. 534 3.D.d APPROVED CONVERSIONS (SDPs & PLAT) FROM USE TO USE DATE PERMIT # (& QUANTITY) (& QUANTITY) FROM DISTRICT TO DISTRICT ATTACHMENTS: RESIDENTIAL WORKSHEET FOR EACH SDP /PLAT / BUILDING PERMIT COMMERCIAL WORKSHEET FOR EACH SDP 2 of 5 Page 76 of 79 Packet Pg. 535 3.D.d HACIENDA LAKES PUD RESIDENTIAL WORKSHEET FOR EACH SDP/PLAT/BUILDING PERMIT TOTAL PROJECT RESIDENTIAL UNITS: 1,760 [UP TO 1,232 MAY BE MULTI -FAMILY] MANDATED UNITS BY GMP 17 IN C DISTRICT 13 IN R/MU FROM C 25 IN RMU 55 MANDATED RES UNITS NON -MANDATED UNITS: 1,705 UNITS [UP TO 1,232 MAY BE MULTI -FAMILY IN ENTIRE PUD] REDUCED BY: 1. CARETAKER'S RESIDENCES IN ENTIRE PUD 2 r n.IITS U S E D nnn r ,nrn1Ezn SIGN TO RV UP TO 1 n6- v T~ S i NITS 1F 29 RV T 441TS A UL' DEVELOPED! 1 RES UNIT - 2.73 UNITS 3r. 2. UNITS USED FOR CONVERSION TO SENIOR HOUSING [UP TO 112.50 RES UNITS FOR 450 SENIOR HOUSING UNITS IF DERIVED FROM RESIDENTIAL] 1 RES UNIT = 4 SENIOR HOUSING EXCEPT INDEPENDENT LIVING SINGLE FAMILY STYLE UNITS ARE 1 TO 1. AT SDP, DETERMINE WHICH MANDATED RES UNITS OR NON -MANDATED UNITS ARE MULTI -FAMILY AND WHICH ARE SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICTS THAT ALLOW RES: C DISTRICT: 17 RES UNITS (MANDATED) R DISTRICT: RMU DISTRICT: 38 UNITS (MANDATED) CONVERSIONS: TO SENIOR HOUSING: DEDUCT [UP TO 112.50 IF RES UNITS ARE DERIVED FROM RESIDENTIAL.] TOTAL: 1,760 Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck thfou^" are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: April 21, 2022 Page 77 of 79 Packet Pg. 536 3.D.d HACIENDA LAKES PUD COMMERCIAL WORKSHEET FOR EACH SDP TOTAL PROJECT COMMERCIAL INTENSITY 327,500 RETAIL IN GROSS FLOOR AREA: 70,000 OFFICE 140,000 BP 92,000 HOTEL OF 135 ROOMS BP DISTRICT: (A) _ 140,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF BP USES; AND IF HOTEL BUILT HERE AND NOT IN C DISTRICT, ADD 92,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA FOR HOTEL UP TO 135 ROOMS (HOTEL CONVERSION DISAPPEARS) OR IF NO HOTEL IN BP & NO HOTEL IN C, ADD 60,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF BP USES (THIS IS HOTEL CONVERSION) ***************************************************** OR (B) PRIVATE OR PUBLIC SCHOOL UP TO 140,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA (EXCLUDES COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT PUBLIC SCHOOLS) R/MU DISTRICT: UP TO 50,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF MEDICAL -RELATED USES [ALL USES ARE OFFICE USES EXCEPT FOR DRUG STORES AND PROPRIETORY STORES (GROUP 5912) WHICH IS RETAIL] [CHECK APPROVED RETAIL IN TRACT C — CAN'T GO OVER 327,500 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF RETAIL IN THE ENTIRE PUD] [CHECK OFFICE IN TRACT C — CAN'T GO OVER 70,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA IN ENTIRE PUD] TRACT C: — 327,500 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF RETAIL; DEDUCT MEDICAL RETAIL APPROVED IN RMU 2. DEDUCT SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF SENIOR HOUSING NOT DERIVED FROM RESIDENTIAL UNITS [MAX 450 SENIOR HOUSING UNITS IN ENTIRE PUD] 4 of 5 Page 78 of 79 Packet Pg. 537 3.D.d 3. UP TO 81,875 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF RETAIL CAN BE CONVERTED TO OFFICE [= 25% OF TOTAL]; AND IF NO HOTEL IN BP & HOTEL CONVERSION NOT USED IN BP, ADD 92,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF HOTEL UP TO 135 ROOMS; AND 70,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF PROFESSIONAL AND GENERAL OFFICE USES DEDUCT UP TO 50,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF PROFESSIONAL AND GENERAL OFFICE IF APPROVED IN RMU DISTRICT CONVERSIONS IN TRACT C: UP TO 25% OF RETAIL CAN BE CONVERTED TO OFFICE [UP TO 81,875 SF] RETAIL TO OFFICE ON A ONE-TO-ONE BASIS [UP TO 81,875 SF] RETAIL TO SF SENIOR HOUSING ON A ONE-TO-ONE BASIS [MAY HAVE 450 SENIOR HOUSING UNITS IN ENTIRE PUD] ***************************************************** 5of5 Page 79 of 79 Packet Pg. 538 3.D.d [FIE. ;) N�• :y,7C j: �!; t. J FLORIDA DEPARTMENT Of STATE -, RON DESANTIS Governor May 31, 2022 Martha S. Vergara, BMR & VAB Senior Deputy Clerk Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court & Comptroller of Collier County 3329 Tamiami Trail E, Suite #401 Naples, Florida 34112 Attention: Ann Jennejohn Dear Martha Vergara: LAUREL M.LEE Secretary of State Pursuant to the provisions of Section 125.66, Florida Statutes, this will acknowledge receipt of your electronic copy of Collier County Ordinance No. 2022-18, which was filed in this office on May 27, 2022. Sincerely, Anya Owens Program Administrator ACO/mas R. A. Gray Building • 500 South Bronough Street • Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0250 Telephone: (850) 245-6270 Packet Pg. 539 3.D.d HACIENDA LAKES MPUD PDI-PL20230016103 ORIGINAL PUD REZONE STAFF REPORT Packet Pg. 540 ._...__ 3.D.d 10/2512011Item 8. C, AGEN Eon it t:tri 3w 10� TO: CALA�-r COty STAFF REPORT COLLTER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ZONrNG SERVICES —LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION —PLANNING & REGULATION HEARIN DATE: JUL 21, 2011 RE: PETITIO O: PUD-2006-AR-10146; HACIENDA LAKES MPUD {COUPANION I'iEMS: DRI-20WAR-10147, AND CP-2006-11 APPLI NT{AGENT : Applicant+ Agents: Raeieada Lakes of Naples, LLC Dwight Nadeau do David Toms RWA Consultant, Inc. 12600 Biscayne Court 6610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34105 Naples, F l,. 34109 REQUESTED A010N. Richard D_ Yovanovicb, Esq. Coleman, Yovanovioh & Koester, P,A Northem Trust Bank Building 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 Maples, FL 34103 The petitioner is asking the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) to consider an application for a rezone frorn the Agricultural (A), Agricultural -Special Treatment Overlay (A- ST) and PL]D zoning district (Sw mp Buggy Days PUD) to the Mixed Use Planned Unit Development WUD) zoning district, far a project tQ be known as the Hacienda Lakes UTUD. GEOGRAPHIC ROGATION: The subject property, consisting of 2262+1- acres is located on the east side of Collier Boulevard (C.R. 951) at the intersection of Collier boulevard and Rattlesnake -Hammock Road and north and south of SaW Palm Road in Sections 11, 12, 13, 14, 23, 24 and 25, TownsMp 50 South, Range 26 East, and Sections 19 and 30, Towmhip 50 South, image 27 East, Collier County, Florida (See location map and proposed PLTD Master Plan on the fallowing pages.) PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT; Approval of this project to allow for a mix of residential, commercial (retail and office), hotel, business park or education facility uses as well as the continuation of existing junior deputies passive recreation and existing swamp buggy attraction uses. Hadersda Lakes MP€JD, PU13Z-20D&AR-10146 Page 1 of 26 July 21, 2011 CCPC Revised: 7113111 Packet Page -158- Packet Pg. 541 7m �I mu u� ki 94,ux�LlY �WORi rV 2r - 4 � 4 1 MknllilF r4 IR4 air WL MA2.5 1Kui 4+N 1iitaYr yVr i L,ai, Ga I e SGP+r a X�R[f I {uj ua f.,lwlkf hLLl +III 3X1 NJIp —it xAHl Ja —� I 14 SNPm1pQ .+ r x,a.A 11 PROJECT IT _ !} Uq Kr u — fD ,hr�.Lw•a !r�}�sCK _ ul I CQ'.l!GS itr16� �r e 34 I .L ua i�8 23 a s, Lk*. Rlr�r �mra�n ]e I 37 34 C�arll }I d3 �q I LOCATION IVIP Y PETITION 0PUDZ-200B-AR-10146 ZONING MAP t � Q ; OG Packet Pg. 542 3.D.d C) Q LO C�J mpu la MIIAl1 or fo-1 Lrs,u I..n.wl Lrif� }Ar i 4'1i�hLL GAY . 54s SwF 9141 �[ LYgo- m I.Ne urar.w MyyxR wx I Iw.r ri•u3t i8 r. L�rYI• K ol� min �n rw ump hoR nR '.+,P 4�M�„L ia`n ur SPn�•AP R m 'LO &4.c oK r+n n[. r+c�s � � r•sea w � e vrrow enoa wn w L�r O 1 �L'pWL99KYi7M.0.Q.49k N I.r itaz-rJ.ar Lwf rams ro �Ari wLF-rwa, n.ls. ui ,.r� [i�Yi,l4�a v{�ayr u.yvwr pa � it E�' f FNI. M + ![� �4Jl,r dl! �+A! IW� ip 4[[m •SO >{K.4 y dd; txn NY �.1 —�l wl dl wM LMd, a iwi nM1W1n+'4 w�{ vnlrr a I� tl CXLD 21P W w S 0 ,K L4,�r ROL M + :L A K+Y,�. GVL I M ?.Mr 1} 4UM .H 'iK,l �dx4 urw wrr a V 3nr P 1 �jr W Pl}'f R 4p 4Rx HOr�P9d fm0� 3 � ono n xlJ 14orS pal V 445J n-0P +rSt f+ 9W+[nL PrA[ rlrf. +I1g4 ++4f Lwrt 493. !JD �H �II 9G4�' 4R� RQ w 4106s +Ilp Q7M—%-O— Ci „Wru.�ifo io,o o, al r [ wo iL4MW +t �eacr'P s+WL E[ 4LPrGa ,4 �±oln Vrri[ L+W 4.96 � K,LL L�.B 491i [R fM, alw �xw Ktl v anlx wo wrs. »S-seo- a.Y nK ra�t�ro-o- ucc a ra.u4ct ,a IK Ifsil. wren Y141L PJlhA� 1W1 !ii P' Sfl'C! 4//.6 lQ MLP-J,61 t [6Mlf� p KY! Wd ulii 1d1 LJ4. PU,G z4h 90S Or ,K aru sw 4z 4L[!Mw s t4wvR�o to Wfai wu vri, of ru4mn I.hB Err'r:k 4 - ray RY4 A[, tol IYI! Aef. 44 q]ISk flf` Rrl 4ni 4ea. +hG M2 ,p'Jt m �! �4 4n4 neS A! Plot r[[1 QCU ..S •Y �L aq.l �qRa fLOLt Mr [imm 4fAP1 16vA[ pl tt 4F.f6! h8fw uu �nn� mr �4ato m mr;ri io- ma iay ooT. +�4r,� N'I,l9F ti� ,uq t+A4 W4CMG nee Tv{� V •Q cvRr}Qrp o,k I �t �4rR Sri +� r.. a`•"4! qa� �u,r A!F w 4+o]r R4Y V E9 a,ra LS.F LSs: MIG hh S,Y iiwf ��ii n< ��wr Jim +iRr 9f �Kv1 QR 4n4 VPIR Q L1 '9P� . ryr '4YK liil o� �441 +tr P R�116S •+„f W.W liG6 � � � Q r p M t FIN .' r a� (D l Packet Pg. 543 3.D.d 10/25/2011Item B.C. The petitioner is requesting approval of this PUD for Hacienda Lakes to allow development as shown on the table on the following page. LAND USE SUMMARY DESICNATCR LAND USE ACREAGE OMMF--�GLAL ,34,10± ORES •CWWE48CIAL LftW UCA- DMF-D 9Y PVMJC ROW T 7 02,59!� ACRES "A" ATTRACTION 47.27-± ACRES 'W REDDENTIIAL 447.86:1-- ACRES W 0R Sn BU fNE S PANIC -OR SCHODL 35.38m6 A1DRE -P" PRESERVE 15".14:!1: ACRES "FF" PUBLIC FAA LITG' l .33t ACRES *JD" J'LP IOR DE J- ( l .0 t ACRES "S°" ISCHOOL 19.55± A RE "R/Mu" RESIDENTtkL/ ED1CAL USE 5,52:� ACRES -Row" PUBLIC ROW J EASEMENTS 72.Dt:t ACRES TONAL. 2 14 t ACFES * ll-r CW9 NED TOTAL OF TIME TW4 RgCE4- S TKE ACM-M cufFER ocRLmE OF 56.57 •• EXCL" T"5 ACRD9 wHM TUTPUNG PRw-CT AREA All IT fS In1CWDED Rr THE -RW 7kR (Note: Since this document was prepared, the designator "BP OR S" has been changed to just "BP') As proposed the, project will be developed in one eight -year phase tha is to be divided into two stages (201 - 016 and 015- 019 as shown below as an excerpt from Master Plan), Mth development to begin in 2012. Buildout is projected to occur in 2019. This PLID application is one of three applications under consideration for the subject site. Companion to this application are a Comprehensive Plan Amenc3srtent (GMPA) and an Application for Development Approval (ADA) of a Development of Regional Impact (DFU). The Swamp Buggy Days lands are included within this project. The project incorporates most of the Swamp Buggy Days PUD (Ordinance #84-2. uses. That will allow the uses that were permitted in that project to continue, or be estabiiahed if they have not been, Please refer to Section VI. Tract "A" Attraction Permitted Uses," and IX. "Swamp Buggy Days Recreation and Sports Park PUD General Development Commitments." SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING {Please refer to the Zoning Nl ap I- Alorth: Agricultural (A), undeveloped areas and mining operations South: Agricultural {A), residential and agricultural uses along Dorgan Road, Beagle Lake Road, Brandy Lane and several other roadways north of Sabal Palm Road, then larger agricultural operations to the south of Sabal )halm Komi, with undeveloped tracts scattered throughout the areas Hacienda takes MPUD. PU L)Z-2006-AR- 10146 ,July 21. 2011 CC PC Revised: 7M3111 Page 2 of 26 Packet Page -161- Packet Pg. 544 IDA 10l l 011 Item S.C. West: a variety of uses and zoning districts along the cast side of CR 951. such as PTJM (First Assembly of God PUD, approved at a maximum density of 7.83 multi -family dwelling units per acre [upa]; and l ockedge RPUD, approved for multi -family development at'a maximum density of 5.3 upa; and Winding Cypress DRIIPUD, approved for a variety of residential zoning dwelling unit types at a maximum density of L2 upa), and C-3, -5 (developed with various commercial uses, including a hospital. several churches), TTRVC (developed as a travel trailer/RV park), and Agricultural zoning azd uses as well as undeveloped tracts, then CR 951 East. Agricultural (A), undeveloped areas GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLATY GMP 'DNSYSTENCY; Future Land Use Element (FLUE): The ounty's Future Land Use Map designates [approxiniWIy I,637 acres] of the subject site as Rural Fringe Mixed Use District (RFMUD) Sending Lands, Belle Meade Natural Resource Protection Area (NRPA.) Overlay. The balance of the site has the fixture land use designations of the Turban Residential Fringe (U) Subdistrict, and fixed Use Activity Center (MUAC) No_ 7. Policies and Provisions for test-, designations are located in the FLUE and the COME of the Growth Management Plan. There is a companion Growth Management Plan amendment, Petition P-006-11, as noted below, approval of this PUD rezone is subject to approval of that petition. Comprehensive Planning staff has prepared an analysis and recommendation memorandum x-. (dated July 12, 2011) that has been attached. To summarize, Comprehensive Planning staff has identified several areas of concern and is rec mmending that this petition may be found consistent with the G P (as amended via P 006-11) subject to the following: A. Modify PUD Ordinance Exhibit materials to include provisions/standards fox, human scale development, pedestrian orientation and focus, and pedestrian and bicycle facilities for Activity Center No. 7 ujnd its interconnected portions of the project. A project of this size and complexity should contain a bicycle/pedestrian and transit master plain that identifies ttw following: • Connections from each residenial neighborhood and commercial development between each component of the project and to the established C -951 Greenway and the existing or planned transit system; • Expanded transit shelters to accommodate existing and future demand_ Staff recommends several trmsit shelters that are adequately sized and afford seaming (Pavilion shelters at a minimum size of 20'x fl, protection from the elements, bike racks or storage facilities, and immediate access to the bicycle/pedestrian network. B. Modify PUTS Ordinance Exhibit materials in Exhibit B, Development_ Standards: Maximum Density+ and intensity Section, residential Density, additionally in Fxhibit F, UsUst of Qwwr Commitments and elsewhere as necessary to include statements committing to develop a3 minimum of 13 residential units in the nearest portion of the adjacent "R", Residential Tract. fappears only in are asterisked informational note, on p ! of Exhibit A]; Hacienda Lakes MPUD , PUDF-2006-AR-10146 Ady 21, 2011 CCPC Revised: 7l13111 Page 3 of 26 Packet Page -162- Packet Pg. 545 10/2 /2011 1te C. Remove the wholesale distribution use presently proposed in Exhibit A, Permitted Uses � for the "11MU", Residential/Medical Use Tract* Consider the recommendations presented above, as matters suggesting change, revision or other action, encouraged in support of the pro}eat prior to fxmal consideration: Transportation Element: Transportation planning staff has reviewed the petitioner's "Traffic Impact Statement (Ti) and has determined that this project can be found consistent with policies 5_1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan with approval of the proposed mitigation. Please refer to the Transportation Review comments for details about the mitigation. Significantly Impacted Links: Multiple roadway links are significantly impacted by this development. These impacts are s=marized in the excerpt from the 2010 AUIR, shown an the next page, in Table 1 (project specific impacts are noted in the most recent Traffic .Impact .Study, and are not shown): In general, the analysis of trips Sc!neratcd by this devOopmenl indicates that the existing roadway network can accommodate the impacts that are produced, if certain mitigation is proposed. All mitigatiou is listed in Exhibit F, Section VI of the PUD document, and is considered sufficient to bring this proposed PUD into compliance with policy 5A of the Transportation Element of the GMT. Mitigating factors for this development include multiple proportionate share allowances, multiple right-of-way conveyances and construction contributions, and also certain development limitations that are dependent upon network improvements. in general terms, the future `Benfield Road' corridor (identified as a need in the 2030 LRT? and subsequently wnfirmed in the current 2035 LRTP), as well as pertinent connections to this corridor such as Rattlesnake Hammock Road Exwasion and The Lords Way, are created or are made viable for future Public [County] ownership. These facilities, along with their respective designfcanstructionlmitigation costs, are borne by the developer as part of the developer commitments. Hacienda Lakes MPUD, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 July21, 2011 GC PC Re+nsed= 7113111 Page 4 of 26 Packet Page -163- Packet Pg. 546 3.D.d 2010 U]R; Existing Network Receiving Significant Impacts from Hacienda Lakes Development IDW Link From To Min Stttd Peak Hour Peak Di, _ Servict V6111121e Peak Haar Peak Di r Total _ Volume Remaining Ca acid LOS Yo1U111C 16-2 Davis boulevard Radio Rd. Collier Boulevard D 1530 998 1771 -241 1a 31-0 Collier Boulevard Golden Gnu, Boulevard C'rolden Crate Boulevard reen Blvd Pine Ridge Road _ D 2180 1924 1824 - 1824 2134 134 2134 46 E T{ 31-1 Collier Boulevard ID D 2450 2450 316 E 31.2 Collier Boulevard Pine Ridge Road Orem 316 E 32-1 Collier Boulevard Green Boulevard Golden Crate Pwky D 2360 — 1458 1212 212.0 2170 2.163 3049 2645 190 287 -49 1l D F 32.2 310 Collier Boulevard Golden [=rate Fwk 1-75 D 2450 -- 3000 Collier Boulevard I-75 Davis Boulevard Rattlesnake Hammock M. — D 34.0 Collier Boulevard Davis Boulevard R 8,.��- D ry p — 3270 3330 2370 1894 x 625 B B 35.0 36,1 36.2 Coll ieT Boulevard Rattlesnake Hammock Rd Tam iami Trail 1569 2053 1277 Collier Boulevard Tamiami Trail al -Mart Driveway- - 1489 1&7 491 $ Co I]ier Boulevard al -Mart Driveway . Manatee Rd- 1970 1560 1392 1950 1787 20 803 E C 37-0 Collier Boulevard �..Y Manatee Road Mahsail Dr D 2590 70.0 Radio Road Livia ton Road Santa Barbara D 212.0 1139 1214 906 C 71.0 Radio load Santa Barbara Boulevard _Boulevard Davis Boulevard D 2100 _ 490 773 1327 B 72-0 Rattlesnake Hummock Rd Tarniami Trail Charlemagne Boulevard i) 1946 ] 613 1745 105 C 73-0 Rattlesnake Hammock Rd Charlemagne Boulevard County Barn load PqQy Avenue D D 1940 2340 1099 368 563 --- 12_21 9G7 836 719 B 74.0 Rattlesnake Hammock Rd. Coup Barn RoadY 073 D 75.D Ratt lesnakc How mock Rd. PD11y Avenue Collier Boulevard D Mavis Boulevard �- l; Rattlesnake Hammock Rd 3200 2370 � $ A 78.0 Santa Barbara Boulevard Radio Road 3250 3250 895 1214 0 2036 3250 79.0 Santa Barbara Extension Davis Boulevard 91,E Tamiami Trsi] East T, Y Tamiami Trail East Davis Boulevard Air rt Rd E 2750 1821. --- — — 2491 2038 2024 726 C; 92.0 Airport Road w Rattlesnake l larrlinock Rd Rattlesnake Hammock Rd Triangle $oulevard E - 3200 2846 2743 354 D 93,0 Tamiami Trail Fast E 3500 797 C 94.0 Tamiami''rail[last� Triangle Boulevard Collier B3 ulevard -- T C0IlierBoulevard E 3200 1705 2232 969 � -- 95-0 Tamiami Trail East Ran Marcy Drive C 1075 754 1186 -lit F Hacienda Lakes MPUD, PUOZ-2005-AR-10146 July 21. 2411 CC PC Revised: 7113111 Page 5 o126 a OD Packet Pg. 547 3.D.d 10/25/2011 Ite C'omervation and Coastal Management Element (CME): Environmental staff has evaluated the proposed PUD for compliance with the COME. Environmental review staff has determined the Hacienda Lakes PUD may be found consistent with the Future Land Use Element and Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan, as would be arn,ended by companion petition CP-006-11. MP Conclusion: The GMP is the prevailing document to support land use decisions such as Ns proposed rezoning to CPUD. Staff is required to make a recommendation regarding a finding of consistency or inconsistency with the overall GMP as part of the recommendation for approval, approval with conditions, or denial of any rezoning petition. A finding of consistency with the FLUE and FLTJ`M designations is a portion of the overall finding that is required, and staff' believes the petition is consistent with the Collier County Growth anagemment Plan as discussed move and as further limited in the Zoning Review Section to analysis of FLUE Policy 5.4. The proposed rezone is consistent with the GMP Transportation Element as prc%iously discussed. Environmental staff also recommends that the petition be found consistent with the COME. Therefore, zoning staff` recommends that the petition be found consistent with the goals, objective and policies of the overall GMP if the conditions recommended by staff are adopted as part of any approval, ANALYI: Staff has completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition including the criteria upon which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in Land Development Code ep (LD ) Subsection I O.02.13.B.5, Planning Commission Recommendation (commonly referred to as the "PUD Findings") and Subsection 10.03.05.I, Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission Report (referred to as "Rezone Findings), which establish the legal bases to support the CCP 's recommendation, The CCPC uses these same criteria as the basses for their re mmendafion to the Board of County Commissioners BCC), who in turn use the criteria to support its action on the rezoning or arnendmmt request. Arm evaluation relative to these subsections is discussed below, under the heading "Zoning Services Analysis." In addition, staff;' offers the foilowing analyses: Environmental Revie-w: Environments! Services staff is recommending approval subject to the Environmental conditions contained in Exhibit F of the PUD document. Please refer to the EAC staff report for details about this projects environmental issues. T'ra sportation Rerie : Transportation Division staff has reviewed the petition and the PUD document and Master Plan for right-of-way and aceess issues as well as roadway capacity, and recommends approval subject to the Developer/owner mmmitrnents as provided in Exhibit F of the MPUD ord4umce. Zoning Services Review: The Master Plan shows the areas proposed for development provided in the Land Use Summary and Legend shown on the Master Plan. Additionally, right-of-way areas are generally depicted. Due to the size of the project and the length of time for build out pursuant to the DRI, building orientation, location and other details are not shown on the Master Plan, but typical drawing have been provided in the PUD document for the various residential type units. Haclenda Lakes MPL)D, RUDZ-2006-AR-10146 Page 6 of 26 Jul} 21, 2011 CCPC RQvWed= 7113111 Packet Page -165- Packet Pg. 548 10/25/2011 I# 3.D.d FLUE Policy 5.4 requires new land uses to be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses. In reviewing the appropriateness of the requested uses on the subject site, the compatibility analysis might include a review of loth the subject proposal and surrounding or nearby properties as to allowed use intensities and densities, development standards (building heights, setbacks, landscape buffers, etc.), building mass, building location and orientation, architectural features, amount and type of open space and location, traffic generationlattrs-ction, etc. There has to be a balance bet►veen the adjacent existing uses and what is allowable by the GMP. The residential Development Standards (Table I) indicate a maximum zoned height of 75 feet would be allowable for multi -family dwellings while ether residential uses would be limited to 35 feet to 45 feet in height. Table II kr Commercial, Public Facilities, aDd Care Unit Development Standards also allows uses up to 75 feet of zoned height. Staff compared this project's proposed height to the adj"rtt Collier Regional Medical Center PLTD wherein the Hospital Subdistrict allows structures up to 100 Beet in height and the Medical Office Subdistrict that allows a maximum height of 75 feet, Staff also cornpared this proposed height to the First Assembly Ministries PLTD that abuts this site north of The Lords Way. That FUD allows a five story/ 7 feet zoned building height for certain uses, Zoning Staff could find the proposed M U-D to be wrnpafible and would have no objection to the proposed height for the Commercial area, as it is adjacent to the Medical Center P€ D, and for the residential uses ONLY IF the multi -family uses above 45 feet in height are located in the RIMU tract or within 400 feet of the First Assembly PUD. Other areas of the site are not sear any project of similar height. The ex#reme northern and eastern residential tracts are adjacent to rural agricultural zoned tracts. `Faller structures are not appropriate in those areas. Additionally, staff is concerned about the proposed "horse stable and related equestri,a� facilities" accessory use in the residential areas. "Related equestrian facilities" is not defined, therefore staff t;annot support that use, Perhaps the horse stable use might be appropriate in certain areas of the site, as alluded to in the description, "Horse stables and related equestrian facilities that complement the IvlPLID's proximity to the Picayune Strand State Forest." Staff is not comfortable with the limitation of "proximity," Staff is of the opinion that the proposed use would only be appropriate for a tract that is within a specified distance of the Strand. The petitioner proposes that private stables on single family lots that are a minimum 10,000 square feet (or 0.23 acres) be permitted. The LDC strictly prohibits horses in any residential district with the statement; Prohibited animals to residential districts. The following animals are to be considered farm animals and are not permitted to be kept in residential districts cxcept as provided for in zoning district regulations: turkeys, chickens, ducks, geese, pigs, horses, cows, goats, hogs, and the like. Horses are a permitted accessory use in the Estates zoning district, which is described in the LDC as a zoning district designed "to provide lands for low density residential development in a Hacienda Lakes MPUD, P UDZ-2006-AR-1 0146 July 21, 2011 CCPC Revised: 7l13171 Page 7 of 26 Packet Page -lb6- Packet Pg. 549 10/25/ 011 Ite r semi -rural to rural environment, with limited agricultural activities." However the Estates zoning district further limits the horse use to no more than two horses for each acre. The petitioner's proposed 10,000 square foot horse lot falls far short of the Estates horse allowance, and the petitioner's proposed use does not limit the number of horses that could be kept per lot. Staff' could support the horse stable use only if the, use was limited to lots that are a minimum of 30,000 square feet, which is more in keeping with the 21,780 square feet allowance per horse in the Estates inning district. Further, the use should be limited to no more than one horse per lot. The petitioner proposes recreational Vehicle Parks as a permitted use in the residential area of the site, as depicted on the site plan. Staff' does not relieve the Recreational Vehicle Ilse is an appropriate use within a residential subdistrict. The LDC nomenclature, in Section 2.02.02.C, defines a TTRVC as a commercial use, as shown below: Where the phrases "commercial districts," "zoned cornrnercially," "commemiaily zoned," "commercial zoning," or phraseology of similar intent, are used in this LDC, the phrases shall be consaucted to include: C-1, C-2, C-3, C•-4, C-5, TTRVC, and commercial components in PUDs. The petitioner proposes to allow all uses permitted by Standard Industrial Ctassification (SIC) code 7033 whieb is described as: Establishments primarily engaged in providing overnight or short-term site for recreational vehicles, trailers, campers or tents. /01 The use categary includes Campgrounds, Campsites for Transients, Recreational Vehicle Parks, and Trailer Park for Transients. LDC Section 2,03.03,E sets forth the requirements for a Travel Trailer -Recreational Vehicle Campground (TTRVC) District U e; LDC Section 4.0 .06 provides special buffer requirements for the TTRVC Zoning District; LDC Section. 5,05.10 includes additional design standards for Travel Trailer and Recreation Vehicle Parks; LDC Section 4.02.01.A.. Table 2.1 includes special setbacks for the TTRVC District also as shown below; TrRVC District - additional yard requirements. setback frvrn exterior boundary of park = 50 ft_; setback from an external street = 50 ft., setback: from an internal street = 25 ft,; setback from any building or other structure = 10 ft. By listing this use within the residential component of this MUPD there is no requirement that the use be governed the requirements of those LDC Section as other c ommemial RV perks would be governed. This TTRVC zoning district contains requirements for internal street access, screen room facilities, and sanitary facilities, such as trash containers, and pump out facilities. The petitioner has offered to limit the RV use to no more than 12 RV units per acre. Staff` has concerns that this density could be well above any adjacent residential density. The petitioner has oiff'ered a 25-foot landscape buffer to separate the, RV use from any other residential use. The PUD document is silent as to the components of the buffer. There is no description as to whether Hacienda Lakes MPUD. PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 Page 8 of 26 July 21, 2011 CCPC Revived. 7113111 Packet Page -167- Packet Pg. 550 10/2 /20'11 Item B.C. it will include a wail; there is nc mention of what Plant materials will comprise the buffer or at what intensity. Staff is concemed that establishing a carnmerciai use --an RV park, with very few limitations and clarifications within 25 feet of residential uses could create a compatibility issue. Staff does not support the RV use within the residential Tract. Any RV use should be set aside as its own tract within the commercial area and a labeled as TTRVC use and be subject to all LDC requirements for the uses, Depending upon the location of the 'ITRVC use within the wmmercial tract, consideration should be given to also limiting the use to RV units such as Class A motor coaches or park model units. However at this time, staff does not support the kV use within Hacienda Dukes PUD. Staff does trot believe the proposed 50-foot zoned and 60-foot actual height proposed in the Business District of this PUD is in accordance with the pwTose and intent of that district that states, "It is intended that the BP district be designed in an attractive park -like envirorument, with low structural density and large landscaped areas for both the functional use of buffering and enjoyment by the a piovees of the BP district." The BP Zoning District allows a 35-foot maximum height and requires 0-foot front, side, and rear yard setbacks. The petitioner proposes ordy Half that distance for all setbacks,-- 5 feet. In the "Narrative Basis for Approval" provided by the petitioner, the petitioner indicates that the BP tract "will provide a transition of land uses" between the Swamp Buggy facilities and the residential uses. Although staff` understands the Swamp Buggy facilities are a unique use and a very intense use, sty' does not agree with that statement the BP tract is transitional because the BP Zoning District is part of LDC Section 2..03.04, Industrial Zoning Districts. Industrial zoning districts are usually NOT located adjacent to residential areas. At best, an office use is usually deemed a "transition" between retail and residential uses, but an industrial use is not commonly considered a viable transition to separate any use fronn a residential use due to the intensity of the industrial uses. An industrial use is more commonly a use for which a transition is required to separate it from residential uses. The applicant is proposing the use Building Construction (Groups 15 1-1542) within the BP tract (IV.A.3.). This use is not included in the allowable uses within the LDC BP Zoning District and should be stricken. The petitioner proposes the use Mcdical, Dental, and Hospital Equipment and Supplies (Ciroup 5047) within the "Rl 1U" ResidentiabMedical Use Tract (R! U). According to the SIC code manual, this use is located within a general category that allmks wholesale distribution of such products. Wholesale uses of this type go beyond the Iitnited scope intended for this limited area around the hospital. Uses in that area are supposed to service the nearby medical community, not reach out to provide service to other county, state and national areas. A use of that size and caliber would be more suitably located within this project's project Business Park area- Thus staff does not support this use and recomrnends that it be removed from the RI U tract's list of uses, Hacienda lakes MPUD, PUaZ-2 6rAR-10146 Page 9 of 26 July 21, 2011 CC PC Ravrsed_ T13l11 Packet Page -i58- Packet Pg. 551 3.D.d 10/2 /2011 Ite le Staff recommends that the BP district structures be limited to a maximum of 35-foot of actual height and all setbacks be required to be a minimum of 50 feet, except boundaries that are shared with residential uses, in which case the setbacks should be increased to 100 feet, Zoning Staff and the County Attorneys office have concems with the proposed "Land Use Conversion Factors" listed on page 18 of the PUD document- The conversions make it difficult to ascertain the exact scope of the finished project, The conversions add too many variables. The applicant assuzes staff that the trade PM Peak Hour Trips limitation that was based upon the projected maximums identified and reviewed in the DRI and PLTD document will limit the project's intensity. however, traa�,pvrtativn planning Aaff has indicated that it may nut be wise to use a conversion table if using conversion ratios if they will be tied to trips. Different types &f commercial uses ufien have different trip generation razes that are not linear in their conversion (i-e, they are logarithmic; the bigger some commercial developments get, the ftwer trips they create per thousand square feet because they become mare efficient through the use of transit services). So, if there is a conversion rate between uses, there would also need to be a zap on trip generation based on the most intense uses). No such cap has been proposed. To date, staff has only supported the use of conversion ratios in conjunction with uses that utilized floor area ratios (FAR) such as oommercial tracts within a mixed use plaruned unit development that is located outside an activity center; hotels, motels and destination resorts; and group housing (LDC Section 5.05.04); and some components of business park developments. In more recent PUD zoning actions, the conversion ratio use was limited to group tare facilities being converted to residential uses and vice versa, using some standardized traffic count ' information to derive the applicable ratios. The petitioner has formulated a requirement to ensure compliance with the conversion ratios on page 19 of the PUD document, ander the title, "Site Development or Plat Approval." The section would require the developer to submit a list of trips consumed to date so the project will not exceed the PM Peak Hour Trig allotment. Staff is concerned that, at any given time, the amount and type of allowable development remaining would become indiscernible to staff and the general public. Trying to monitor a development containing the potent.Wly constantly moving numbers would become too difficult. Therefore staff does not support any conversion ratio use for this project other than care units, group housing, and group housing units. Section X of the PUD document needs to be revised such that the responsible party is clearly discernable. Throughout the life of this development, one entity needs to be held accountable to address any issues that arise. The current language nods to be replaced with the R)IJcwiPg- (one entity *reftafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD and DRI monitoring until close-out of the PUD and DRI, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all P DID-Rf commitments until close-out of the PUD and DRI. At the time of this PUD approval, the Afanaging Entity is hacienda Lakes of Naples LLC'. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a Hacienda Lakes MPUD, PUDZ-2 D06-AR- 10 146 Page 10 of26 July 21. 2011 CCPC Revised; 7113111 Packet Page -169- Packet Pg. 552 EEJ 10/2512011 Item O.C. successor entity, their it roast provide a copy of u legally banding document that reeds to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. Lifter such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the P LTD and DR I by the riew owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity droll not be relieved of its responsibility under this ,Section. When the PLED and DRl are closed -out, then the Managing Entity is no longerresponsible for the monitoring andfulffllm ent of PUD and DR} commitments. To summarize, Zoning Staff` could find the proposed MPUD to be compatible and complementary to the surround land uses subject to the following conditions of approval, 1) The proposed height for the residential uses above 45 *et in height in the Commercial area shall be located in the RiMU tract or within 400 feet of the First Assembly PUD; 2) Horse stable ar)d related equestrian facilities as accessory use in the residential areas are prohibited; 3 Recreational Vehicles Park use is prohibited; 4) The use Building Construction (Groups 1521-1542) within the BP tract is prohibited; 5 The BP district structures shall be limited to a maximum of 35-faot of actual height and all setbacks shall be a minimum of 50 feet, except boundaries that are shared with residential uses, in which case the setbacks shall be a minimum of 100 feet, 6) The, PUD document shall be revised to remove conversion ratios for all uses except care units, group housing, and group housing units. Modify PUB Ordinance Exhibit materials to include provisions/standards for human scale development, pedestrian orientation and focus, and pedestrian and bicycle facilities for Activity Center lira. 7 and its interconnected portions of the project, A project of this size and complexity should contain a bicycle/pedestrian and transit master plan that identifies the fallowing: • Connections from each residential neighborhood and commercial development between each component of the project and to the established CR-9 1 Greenway and the existing or plarmed transit system; • Expanded transit shelters to accommodate existing and futuro demand. Staff recommends several transit shelters that are adequately sued and afford seating (Pavilion shelters at a minimum of 20'x2W), protection from the elements, bike racks or storage facilities, and immediate access to the bicycle/pedestrian network, ) Modify PUD Ordinance Exhibit materials in Exhibit B. Development Standards: Maximum Density and Intensity Section, Residential Density, additionally in Exhibit 1, List of Owner Commitments and elsewhere as necessary to include statements committing to deveiop a minimum of 13 residential units in the nearest portion of the adjacent "T', Residential Tract, [appears only in an asterisked informational note, on pg. 1 of 1Jhibit A]. HKienda Lakes MPUD. PU DZ-2006-AR-1 0146 July21, 2011 CCPC Revksed= 7113111 Page 11 of 26 Packet Page -170 Packet Pg. 553 3.D.d 10/2 /2011 Ito 9) Remove the wholesale distribution use (Medical, Dental, and Hospital Equipment and � Supplies (Group 5047)) presently proposed in Exhibit A, PerF-dw d Uses for the `R'IVIU", Residential/Medical Use Tract. 10) Section X of the PUD document needs to be revised to state the following: One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD and DRI monitoring until close-out of the PLTD and DRI, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD/DRI commitments until close-out of the LAUD and DRI_ At the time of this PUD approval, the Merging Entity is Hacienda Lakes of Naples LL . Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal suf kiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer b County staff, and the successor entity shall became the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managumg Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowiedgement of the commitments required by the PUD and DRI by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitmemts through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD and DRI are closed -out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring amd fulfilSment of PUD and DRI commitments, Consider the recommendations presented above, as matters suggesting changes, revisions or other actions, encouraged in support of the project prior to final comsideratioa, With limitations proposed by staff, staff is of the opinion that this project will be compactible with � the ad aunt uses and zoning in the area. Deviation Discussion: The petitioner is seeking nine deviations from the requirements of the LD. The deviations are listed in PUD Exhibit E with the petitioners' rationale provided to support each deviation provided in the Narrative & Basis for Approval document that is included in the application material. Deviations are a normal off shoot of the PLFD rezoning process following the purpose and intent of the PUD zoning district as set forth in LDC Section 2.03.06 which says in part: It is further the purpose and Intent of these PUD regulations to encourage ingenuity, innovation and IrnaginW on in the planning, design, and development or redevelopment of relatively large tracts of laird under unified ownership or control, P UDs , , . , may depart from the strict application of setback freight, and minimum lot requirements of conventional zoning districts while maintaining minimum sfunrdards by which flexibility may be accomplished, and while protecting the public interest. , - - Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC Subsection 5.03.02.1A.1.. related to alteration of ground where a fence or wall is to be installed, which prohibits alteration of existing ground levels for the purpose of increasing the height of a proposed fence or wall, to allow fences or walls to be installed on top of berms. Fence or wall blights shall comply with Deviation #5. Hacienda takes MPUD, PUDZ-2066-Aft-1 D146 Page 12 of 26 JdY 21. 2011 CCPC Revised: 7113111 packet Page -171- Packet Pg. 554 IDA 10/2 /2011 Item EEC, Petitioner's Radonale: The applicant states in his justification that "this deviation is contemplated for the subject property far compatibility with the surrounding land uses and to provide for a taller road noise attenuation barrier to separate vehicular movernent on future private and public roadways, as well as to provide for compatibility between the various permitted land uses. This ground alteration in the location of proposed fences and walls provides for an efficient use of the development land area and provides an effective means of minimizing roadway related impacts on land uses adjacea to roadways, whether public or private." Staff and Recanwwndadon: This deviation would allow the developer to measure fences and walls from something other than what the LDC allows as shown below: Fence and wall design standards in all districts. 1, Measurement offence or wall #eight: a_ aisting ground levels shall not be altered for the purpose of increasing the height of a proposed ,fence or wall except as provided for in this section and section 4.06 00, b. Determination of ground level. The height of a fence or wall shall be rnearured from the ground level at the fence or wall locatiom 77re Courdy Manager or designee shall determine zhe ground level for the purposes of meuraxring the height when it has been determined that the ground level has been altered for the purposes of increasing the freight_ In such determinations, the County Manager or designee may consider, but is not limited to, the following facts: i. General ground elevation of the entire lot, u_ In the case of a lot with varying ground elevations, the average elevation over the length of the fence or wall and at paints in the 'vicinity of the fence or wall, c. The ground elevation on both sides of the fence or wall. In measuring the height, the ground elevation on the side of the fence or wall location that is at the lowest elevation shall be used as a point from which the height is to be measured. This deviation exceeds the intent of deviations that are to allow for PUD dimensional variations. Deviations are not to be used to change bow something is measured. The petitioner has sought deviation 45 to allow for increased height of fences or walls; that deviation is the appropriate ni mechasm to seek approval of taller fences or walls. If the petitioner wants taller fences or walls than what is being sought in deviation #5, then deviation 95 needs to be revised. Therefore, this deviation seems imppropriate. Zoning and Land Developxnent Review staff would recommend DENIAL of this deviation finding that in compliance .with LDC Section 10, _13_A.3. the petitioner has NOT dumon5vaed that "the clement may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health safety and welfare of the c munit " and LDC Section 10,0 .1 .S,5.lti the peitioner has NOT demonstrated that the deviation is "'ustified as meeting public VurDoses to a deggee at least eguivalent to literal Mlication of such regulatioms." Hacienda talon MPUD, P UDZ-2NG-AR- 10146 ,icily 21, 2011 CC PC Revised; 7113111 Page 13 of 26 Packet Page -172 Packet Pg. 555 Deviation K seeks relief from LDC Subsection 6.06.0 LB, related to streets in subdivisions, that � requires subdivisions to have platted road rights -of -way for streets, to allow private streets to be Provided by sgxxaate access easements rather than platted road rights -of way. Petitioner's Rationale: The petitioner provided the following justification for this deviation: Some of the multi -family residential development scenarios provided for in this ILTD are compact in design, and the desire to plat the individual lots necessitates the use of access easements rather than right-of-way tracts as is required by LDC. This deviation from LDC requirements is innocuous given that the internal streets will function more as driveways, sirniisr to condorninium projects, and will be privately maintained by the future home owners association. The platting of the lots intended to be sold in a fee simple manner will provide a greater sense of pride in ownership and will be consistent and Compatible with the future, neighboring subdivisions within, and beyond the boundaries of the MPUD. Staff Analysis and Recommendation. The deviation is an oft -sought alternative, The LDC Section 6.06.01.0 allows developers of any type (zoned) project to seek alternatives pursuant to LDC Section 6.06.01,0 at the time of platting. Those requests must be accompanied b "documentation and justification for the alternate section based on sound engineering principals and practices" These alternative designs are often sought as part of the zoning process so the developer can have some assurances that the proposed Master Concept Plan is viable if the Master Plan siting was calculated using an altemative design. The PUD deviation process provides a way for the petitioner to arquire that assurance Aithout being required to submit the alternative design in compliance with LDC Section 6.0 .01.0. Staff concurs with the applicant's assessment of the situation for this particular project. Staff sees no detrimental effect if this deviation request is accommodated. Zoning and Land Develoymen.t Review staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation, finding that in cowliance Aith LDC Section 10-0,13,A-3, the pdtiouer has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community " and LDC Section 10.0 .13.B.51the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is `;"nod. as meting_public pumoses to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such re cations." Deviation 93 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.04.04.B,5.c that limits the number of model homes, to allow one model borne for each variant of the residential product proposed in the various phases or communities within the project. The number of model homes may exceed five for each phase or community within the project. but shall not exceed a total of 60 models for the entire MPUD development. Petitioner's RWianale: The petitioner provided the following justification for this deviation: A project of this size may be broken into several communities, with each community potentially providing a variety of residence types, styles and floor plans, it is essential not to arbitrarily limit the opportunity of a home buyer to see the creativity of the architecture proposed in a development. This deviation is appropriate, and does not negatively affect Hacienda Lakes MPUD. PUDZ-200&-AR-10146 July 21. 2011 CCPC Revised; 7113111 Page 14 of 26 Packet Page -173- Packet Pg. 556 3.D.d 10l 12011 Item the health and safety, Dr weifare of the future residents of the development. A reasonable limitation on the number of models (e.g.. not to exceed 60 models for the entire MPUD) has been provided for in the MPUD Document, Staff Analysis and Pecommendadon flue to the size of the project, staff agrees that some allowance can be made to allow additional model units. Staff concurs with the applicant's assessment of the situation for this particular project. Staff sees no detrimental effect if this deviation request is accommodated. However, staff suggests that the developer be required to provide documentation at each development order stating how many models are in operation to ensure the total of 60 is not exceeded, Zoning and Land Development Review staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation with the stipplation that the develo rovide the number of existing model horn.eluGnits as M of the application material for every developrrxent ord_et, finding that: in_Lomphance with LDC Section 10,0 ,13,A.3 the petitioner has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the heal safety and welfare of the e4nm nunity," and LDC Section 10.02.133,514 the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is Justified as meekblic MMoscs to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such _re lations." Deviation #4 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02 to allow "boundary marker" signage on property corners fronting on existing, proposed, or future public roadways that provide access to the MPUD. The sign content area for "boundary markers" to be located in the residential Tract R may be 15 feet in height rather than 8 feet in height for ground signs as I n ited in LDC Subsection 5.06.02E_6,b. Pe ener's Ratioivale: The petitioner provided the following justification for this deviation: This deviation is requested primarily for safety and welfare reasons. Given existing traffic conditions on Collier BoWevard, and in anticipation of travel conditions on future public roadways, the requested signage will help motorists identify the entrance location from a distance that is sufficient to allow them to safely gain access to the property. The sign content area for boundary markers to be located in the residential Tract R may be 15 feet in height rather than 8 feet as limited in LDC Sub con 5,06,02.B. .b. This additional sign height is deemed necessary due to the elevations of the existing and future public roadways. ,Staff Analysis and Reco mendw on. Due to the sire of the project, stag' agrees that some additional sigttage may be appropriate; however the term "boundary marker" is not a defined term. In order for staff to adequately understand and enforce the provisions of this PUD, the terra heeds to be clearly defined. In speaking with the appiicant's agent, a boundary Mwker sign is to be a sign located at project comers of roadways_ Also, it was expiairied to staff that the sign copy would be limited to the name of the overall project —Hacienda Lakes —not individual tracts within the overall project, Also the sign copy could include the project;'s logo. These signs would be in addition to any other signs permitted by the LDC Staff could support this deviation if the deviation is limited such that the sign copy is limited to the overall project natne and its logo. and further limited to placement only on roadways that Hacienda Ickes MPUD, PUDZ.2006-AFC-10146 July 21, 2011 CCPG Revised, 7113111 Page 15 of 26 Packet page -174 Packet Pg. 557 3.D.d 10/2 /2011 ate s function as ar eria►l or collector roadways, given the potential increased traffic and possible higher speeds of that traffic over a local or a private roadway. These limitations would need to be added into the PUD document. Zoning and Land Development. Review staff` recornrmends APPROVAL of this deviation if the limitations noted above are incpoorated into the PUD dogument,. finding that, in compliance with LDC Section. 10.02..13.A.3 the etitioner has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and - welfare of the commmunity." and LDC Smtion 10. 2,13 3B 51. the oetitioner has demonstrated that the deN iaRion i justified as meeting public purposes to a► donee at least equivalent t.(> literal Uphration of such reguladons." Deviation #5 seeks relief from LDC Seution 5.03,OIC.2, that limits fence or wall heights to six (6') feet., to allow' fences or walls to be no greater than eight (8') feet throughout the development. Where associated with existing or biture public roadways, or Tract A, a 0-fovt- tall visual screen may be installed as a wall, berm, or wailPberrn combination. Petitioner's Rafionde. The petitioner provided the following justification for this deviation: This deviation is requested to provide for separation screening between the various residential communities that may be oreated throughout the MFUD, as well as between units as privacy walls. Where associated with existing or future public roadways, or the swamp baggy track within the Attraction Tract, a 20 foot tall visual and sound attenuating screen may be instaRed as a wall, berm, or walllherm combination. The LDC � limitation of six foot fences and walls do not provide for the necessary screening and sound attenuation desired for the development. Staff- Analysis and Reconmwndadon. Staff finds the petitioner's deviation and rationale supportable for this project, A twenty -foot high wall sums appropriate given the uses proposed in the Attraction tract, Zoning and Land Development Review staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation, findin that, in compliance with LDC Section 10,02,1;3. theyetitioner has demonstrated that "the element rmayr_ be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community;' and LDC Section 10.0 .13.B.5.h, the petitioner has..immsitAted that the,sleyiatio is "justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least a uivalent to literal application of such re ations." Deviation #6 seeks relief from LDC Sections 4,02 . 13 G., and 4.06.0 .5_, that requires a six foot taI] opaque architecturally finished masonry wall, or berm, or combination thereof be provided around the boundaries of a business park. Buffering around the proposed Business Park Tract would be as required by the entirety of the referenced sectious of the LDC, but the six foot wall, or berm. or combination thereof would only be required where the Business Park Tract abuts the Residential Tract_ Petitioner's Rationale: The petitioner provided the following justification for this deviation: Haclende Lakes MPUD, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 .truly 21, 2011 CCPC Revised, 7113111 Page 16 of 26 Packet Page -175- Packet Pg. 558 3.D.d 'i 0/2 5/2 011 Its N This deviation is appropriate given the specific characteristics of the existing and proposed land uses that would be proximate to the future business park land uses. The required buffer is most appropriate between the Business Park Tract and the Residential Tract, and furthers the intended compatibility assurance that would be achieved through such separation and buffering. The Applicant finds that the land uses permitted in the Attraction Tract would not be &usceptibieto significant impacts from noise,, odor, or glare impacts that may emanate from future business park lard uses given that the character of the lard uses permitted in the Attraction 'Tract may be complementary to those land uses that may be developed in the Business Park Tract. The primary land use of the Attraction Tract being periodic swamp buggy and other nwtoriztd vehicle competitions may garner fabrication or other mechanical support services from future business park land uses. While the spatial and landscape buffer requirements of the LDC would be upheld, the requirement to construct wall or berm to a height of six feet would not apply to the boundaries of the Business Park Tract abutting the Attraction Tract and Preserve Tract. No land alterations or structures are permitted in the Preserve Tract that would require compatibility buffering from future land uses that may be developed in the Business Park Tract, therefore, no wall or berm is required along this common botiadary. Staff Analysis and RecomrrrertriFa&a. The Business Park (BP) does not appear to abut any Preserve Tracts, In fact, the abutting tracts are Resideatial ( and Public Facilities (PF). The tract also has frontage along The Lord's Way, with the Attraction Tract located on the other side of The Loi-d's Way. given the extensive list of potential uses and lack of any detail as to the site design (location of buildings or other appurtenances such as communication towers) and the information presented in other areas of this staff report, staff cannot support this deviation, Staff does not believe a reduction of the wall requirement would be in keeping with the purpose and intent of the BP Zoning District. Zoning and Land Develooment Review staff recommends DENIAL of this deviation. f"indin that in com liance with LDC Section 10.02.13-A-3 the pqAtioner has NOT demonstrated that "the element my be waived without a detrimental effect on the health s4fety and welfare of the community." and LDC Seetion__10.0-13,R-5.h, the petitioner has NOT demonstrated_ that the deviation is "iustified as meetintz uublic uurooses to a degree at least equivalent to literal lication of such regWations." Deviation #7 seeks to allow one real estate sign in addition to the real estate signage permitted in LDC Section 5.06.0 B.2., that would be erected off -site from the residential Tract, in the Commercial Tract. Peed on is Rationale, The petitioner provided the following jUsti firation I'or this deviation: This deviation is intended to provide exposure of the residential marketing efforts for communities in the bhPUD that lie east of the corwriemial portion of the Project through off -site real estate signage to be located in the Commercial Tract. This one addirional real estate sign, of the height and dimensions of LDC Section 5-06.02 B,2-c., would be more evident to the motoring public either on Collier Boulevard, or on the future extension of Haci%da takes MPUD, PUDZ-2 AR-10146 Ally 21. 2011 CCP Revised; 7113111 Page 17 Df 26 Packet Page -176- Packet Pg. 559 10/2 512 011 1 teLIE:] Rattlesnake Hammock Road. This deviation is appropriate given the distance that the residential development areas are from the major public roadway accesses to the MPUD. Staff Anufysis and Re ommendatiom Staff finds the petitioner's deviation and rationale supportable for this project. Zoning and Land Development Review staff recommends APPROVAL of ibis devia49A finding that in compliance with LDC Section 10,02.13,A.3. the pefitioner has deronstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health safety and welfare of the community " and LDC Section 10.02,133.51the pg1iftionerhas demonstrated that the deviation is "Justified as meeting ublic pmMoses to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulatiyn5," Deiiation #8 The existing Swamp Buggy sign located in the southeast corner of Rattlesnake Hammock Road and Collier Boulevard shall be allowed to remain in the present location until, the sign is relocated to allow the construction of the bridge to extend Rattlesnake Hammock Road, and/or a new sign can he pern fitted in Tract C. .Petitioner's Rationale: The petitioner provided the following justification for this deviation_ The existing Swamp Buggy sign located in the southeast corner of Rattlesnake Hammock road and Collier Boulevard shall be allowed to remain until a new sign can be permitted in Tract C. This deviation is consistent with Resolution Number 011-57, that approved � an after the fact sign variance for the existing Florida Sports P arkISwarnp Buggy Races sign. Staff Analysis and Recommendation. Staff finds the petitioner's deviation and rationale supportable for this project, Zonkg and Land Development review staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation, finding that, in compliance with LDC Section 10-02.13-A-3. the petitioner has demonstrated that "the element rnav be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community," and LDC Section 10.0 .13.B,5.h, the petitioner has dem pristrated that the deviation is `°iustified as rneetin2 public Durvoses to a degree at least ecuivalent to literal amlicatkm of such re ations," Deviation 49 seeks relief frorn LDC Section 5.05.04 D.I . that limits care unit Floor Area Ratio (FAR) to 0.45, to allow a care unit FAR of 0.60. Peddoner's Rationale. The petitioner provided the folluMng justification for this deviation, This deviation is consistent with past approvals for floor area ratios associated with "case units" that provide housing for senior citizens. This deviation will allow for efficiency in design of care unit land uses while providing for the supporting infrastructure and open space within a development parcel. r Hacienda Lakes MPUD. P UDZ-20M-AR-1 0 146 Page 18 of 26 July 21, 2011 CCPC Revised, 7113111 Packet Page -177- Packet Pg. 560 IDA 10/2 /2011 tM�111 03�0. eahN Staff Analysis and Recammendu�lon. Star` finds the Y petitioner's deviation and rationale supportable for this project. Zonine and Land Develo ment Review staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation finding that, in compliance with LDC Section 10,0 .13,A.3. the nelifioner has demonstrated that "the element ma be waived without a detrimental effect on the health. safety and welfare of the communi " and LDC Section 10.0 .13.B.5.h the petitioner has demonstated that the deviation is "Justified as meefing joublic pnoses to a degree at least a ui- alent to literal APRUcation of such re fations." FINDINGS OF FACT: PUD Findings: LDC Subsection 10.0 ,13,B.5 states that, "In �upport of its recommendation, the CCPC shall make findings as to the PUD Master Plan's compliance with the following criteria" (Staffs responses to these criteria are provided in bold font), I, The suitability of the area for the type amdpattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the lanc4 surrounding areas, traffk and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities, Staff his reviewed the proposed rezout and believes the uses and property development regulations are compatible with the development approved in the area as limited by staff. If staffs limitations are accepted, the commitments made by the applicant should provide adequate assurances that the proposed change should not adversely affect living couditioas in the area. 2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements. coWracts, or other insimnsents, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense_ Documents submitted with the application, which were reviewed by the County Attvrney's Office, demonstrate unified control of the property. additionally, the development will be required to gain platting and/or site development approval. Both processes will ensure that appropriate stipulations for the provision of and continuing operation and maintenance of infrastructure will be provided by the developer. 3, Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). Staff has reviewed this petition and has offered an analysis of the relevant goals, objectives and policies of the G?4P within the GMP discussion and the attached report from Comprehensive Planning staff and the zoning analysis of this staff report. Based on those staff analyses, planning zoning staff is of the opinion that this petition may be found consistent with the overall GMP with the staff recommended limitations. 4. The internal and external compatibility ofproposed apses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, resirictionrs on design, and buffering and screening requirements_ Hacienda Lakes MPUD, PUD -2ow-AR-1o14e Page 10 of 26 .tiny 21. 2011 CCP Revised; 7113111 Packet Page -17 - Packet Pg. 561 3.D.d Staff has provided a review of the proposed uses and Relieves that the project will be compatible with the surrounding area, subject to approval of the recommended limitation of staff, the proposed development standards and project commitments. .5. Me adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. The amount of native preserve aside for this project meets the minimum requirement of the LDC. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvemerrrs and faciliries, both public andprivat,�, The developer has proposed that this project will be developed in one, eight -year long phase and has provided the following breakdown as found in the DRI DO Map% H-2 4)- ESTNATED DEVELOPMEW SCHEDULE aae One yr ON p R� p�� C Sin leY �W Cry F w-Fa unwJ AOA U6Lca R P&I F 2012 50 Urns 29 Uryr� 30 LM 2754D SF 0.0 SF U.D SF 2U13 200 Unb SOD uft 100 LIN% IS O SF 20�DW SF OD SF M4 290 U[� 1UD WAS 100 unit 15Ef 000 SF' 25OW SF 4U 000 SF M5 250 Units a 100 Unit. 150 Ms OJO SF 250m SF OA SF 2016 250 UnIb HN UMS 150 Urdu DJ0 SF 0.0 SF U_4 S 95DLMb 429 UnKS 530 Urns Wion SF I 700W SF I 410M SF I ESTIMATED DEVELOPMEWT SCHEDULE Swe Two eer a ausimess Fork 1t" 2015 25 UKT9 U UNF3 25 unra 0.0 SF 0.0 SF MOM 9F 919 S XIef lg 2M6 25 UN19 C Unhs 25 LInZ 0.0 SF O.D SF 20 004 9F 21F 275 UrLb SUD UrINS 175 UIIiCS 10.0 Sr 0.0 SF mono 8F 2we 275 Una 10 Unts 175 Uf tt9 10J0 SF 0.0 $F 20,000 8F 2 I 21D l 64 Units126 kkft QJD 8F 0.0 SF SF 810 294 Undo ra26 Units U1 0 I 100 DW S1' 1 919 8kzMrdB T*tels: fm unh TU [hits t,45G unds 327,594 SF 70,ON 5F Ham SF M ShKkft 'l lie 135 RMM rde41s pm9m 10 o he Gadenped a Ptrm Ono. an 2014_ The DRI DO document addresses the phasing of the project as to determixnations of any substantial deviation if the phasing schedule is violated, in compliance with Florida Statutes, ', The ability of the subject property and o .surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. The area has adequate supporting infrastructure sucb as read capacity, wastewater disposal system, and potable water supplies (with the mitigation provided in the PUD document and the DRI DO) to accommodate this project based upon the commitments made by the petitioner and the fact that adequate public facilities requirements will be addressed when devclopmcnt approvals are sought. _ Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modi icarions of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at 16ast equivalent to literal application of such reg-RIations. Hacienda Lakes MPUD, PUDZ-20D�AR-10146 Page 20 of 26 Juty 21, 2011 CCPC Revised. 1113111 Packet Page -17 Packet Pg. 562 10/25/2011 Item 8. . The petitioner is seeking nine deviations to allow design flexibility in complian with the purpose and intent of the Planned Unit Development Districts (LDC Section 2.03.06.A). This criterion requires an evaluation of the extent to which development standards and deviations proposed for this PUD depart from development standards that would be rewired for the most similar conventional zoning district. Staff has provided an analysis of the deviation requests in the Deviation Discossion portion of this staff report, and is recommending support of Deviations 2, 5, 7, 8 and 9; support with limitations of Deviation 3 and 4; and Denial of Deviations l and 6 as explained in the deviation section of this staff` report. Rezone Findings: LDC S'ubsecrion 10.03.0S,I. states,-Vvherl pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations to the planning commission to the Board of County ommissivnem... shall show that the planning commission has studied and considered proposed change in relation to the following whm applicable" (Staffs responses to these criteria are provided in bold ont)- 1. Whether the proposed change will be consisrera with the goals, objectives, car policies o the Future Land Use Map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan. The zoning analysis provides an in-depth review of the proposed project. Staff is of the opinion that the project as proposed is consistent with GMP FLUE Policy 5.4 requiring the project to be compatible with neighborhood development. Staff recommends that this petition be deemed consistent with the FLUE of the GMP if staffs conditions of approval are adopted. The petition can also be deemed consistent with the C ME. Therefore, staff recommends that this petition be deemed consistent with the GMY gubject to sta►ff's conditions of approval. - The existing 1, rmd use pattern; Staff has described the existing land use pattern in the "Surrounding Land Use and Zoning" portion of this report and discussed it at length in the zoning review analysis. Staff believes the proposed rezone is appropriate given the existing land use pattern, and development restrictions included in the PUD. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts; The proposed PUD rezone) would net create an isolated zoning district because there are lands to the west along CR 951 that are also zoned PUD (see Zoning Map). 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the propertyproposedfor change. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed district boundaries are logically drawn given the current property ownership boundaries. The rezoning does create one, isolated pocket; however that site is a state-owned preservation aria upon which no development is planned. The proposed uses around this pocket are shown as preserve. 5. Whether changed or changing eonditioru make the passage of the proposed rezoning necessary- Hi9denda Cakes MPUD, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 July 21. 2011 CCPC Revised: 7f13111 Page 21 of 26 Packet Page -180- Packet Pg. 563 3.D.d 10/2 /2011 1te r The proposed rezone is not necessary, Per se; but it is being requested in compliance with the LDC provisions to seek such the rezone to allow the owner the opportunity to develop the land with uses other than what the existing zoning district would allow. Without rezoning, the agriculturally zoned tracts could not be developed with the proposed uses or with the proposed property development regulations. The applicant's request is consistent with the proposed GMPA. 6 Whether the proposed charge will adversely influence living conditions in the ire ighhorhood; Staff is of the opinion that the proposed rezone, with the commitments made by the applicant, can been deemed consistent ounty's land use policies that are reflected by the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the GMP. The project includes amincrvus restrictions and standards that are designed to address compatibility of the project. Development in compliance with the proposed PUD rezone should not adversely impact living conditions in the area. 7 nether the proposed change will create or excessivdy increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic is deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because o ,peak volumes or projected types of vehic-ular traffre, including activity during construcrion pleases of the development or otherwise affect public safely. The roadway infrastructure has adequate capacity to serve the proposed project with the mitigation that will be provided by the developer. Staff believes the petition can be deemed le consistent with all elements of the G P if the mitigation is included in any recommendation of approval. 8, nether the pr-oposed change will create a drainage problem; The proposed rezone will not create drainage or surface water problems. The developer of the project will be required to obtain a surface water management permit from the SFNVMD prior to approval of a local site development plan. The conceptual master plan identifies the conceptual location of the water management areas which will be a component of the water management system. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas; If this rezone petition is approved, any sub"uent development would need to comply with the applicable LDC standards for development or as outlined in the PUD document. The location of the proposed buildings, combined with the setbacks and project buffers will help insure that light and air to adjacent areas will not be reduced. 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent area, This is a subjective determination based upon anticipated results, which may be internal or exterusl to the subject property. property valuation is affected by a host of factors including zoning; however zoning by itself may or way not affect values, since value determination is driven by market conditions. HadeMa Lakes MPUD, PUDZ-2005-AR-10146 Page 22 of 26 July 21, 2011 CCPC Reviser 7113M I Packet: Page -191- Packet Pg. 564 3.D.d 10/ 5/ 011 ltem GOO 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or develop nera of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations; The proposed zoning change should not be a deterrent to the improvement of adjacent properties. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasting with thepublic we}are; The proposed develupment complies with the Growth Management Plan which is a public policy statement supporting zoning action: when they are consistent with said amprehensive Plan. In light of this fact, the proposed change does not constitute a grant of special privilege. Consistency with the FLUE is further determined to be a public welfare relationship because actions consistent with plans are in the public interest. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why Me properly cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning; The subject property could be developed within the parameters of the existing zoning designations; however, the petitioner is seeking this rezone in compliance with LD provisions for such action. The petition can he evaluated and action taken as deemed appropriate through the public hearing process. Staff believes the proposed rezone meets the intent of the PUD district, if staffs conditions of approval are adopted, and further, believes the public interest will be maintained. 1¢_ Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the County, The petitioner proposes to develop a large, multi -faceted, mixed use development on 2,262:� acres. The new non-residential uses will be located nearer to the intersection of Rattlesnake Hammock and CR 951, which is consistent with the current non-residential use trend in the area, and consistent with the proposed GMFA. Residential uses will be located west of the proposed public right of way reservation in the northern. portion of the project and along both sides of the project in the area south of the proposed Rattlesnake Hammock extension. Preserve areas are located on the eastern project perimeter. The overall project density of 0.78 units per acre makes the project a low density project The project has been evaluated for compliance with the GNtP and found to be consistent with the GMP requirements, as amended, if staffs conditions of approval are adopted. The GMP is a policy statement, which has evaluated the scale, density, and intensity of land uses deemed to be acceptable throughout the urban -designated areas of Collier County. Staff is of the opinion that the development standards and the developer commitments will ensure that the project is not out of scale with the needs of the community if the stab stipulations are adopted. 15. Whether is it impossible to find wher adequate sins in the County for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. The petition was reviewed on its own merit for compliance with the GMP and the LDC; and staff does not review other sites in conjunction with a specific petition. The proposed Hacienda Lakes MPUD, P UDZ-2CC6-AR- 10146 July 21. 2011 DCPC Revised; 7113111 Page 23 of 26 Packet Page -18 Packet Pg. 565 IDA 10/25/2011 It mn . . rezone is consistent with the GNP as it is proposed to he amended as discussed in other portions of the staff report. 16_ The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration, which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. Most new development anticipated by the PUD document would require considerable site alteration. This project will undergo extensive evaluation relative to all federal, state, aud local development regulations darlug the site development plan or platting approval process and main Inter as part of the building permit process. 17. The impact of development are the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels o service adopted in the Collier County Growth Afanagement,flan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, as atnerrded This petition bas been reviewed by county staff that is responsible for jurisdictional elements of the GMIP as part of the rezone process and those staff persons have concluded that no )bevel of Service will be adversely impacted with the commitments contained in the PUD document and the DRI DO, 18, Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners (BCC shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and evedare. To be determined try the BCC during its advertised public hearing. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING { I.M) Dwight Nadeau, Planning Manager of RWA, began the NIM meeting at 5:30prn. Dwight introduced himself; David Torres, Manager of Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC; Richard Yovan.ovich of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P-A,; and Bob Mulhere of Mulhere Associates. Collier County Staff— Kay Deselem & Corby Schmidt were also present. Dwight presented a general project overview and provided a fact sheet which included pertinent development information related to residential yield non-residential land use intensities, recreational and attraction land uses, and preservation cress. Dwight provided the current status of the, project with respect to future hearing dates for adoption and also explained the process of netxfying the surm nding property owners of the Neighborhood Information Meeting NIM). The following concerns were raised by the property owners and addressed by the applicant and agent team, Preserve Area — Now will this development impact wildlife and their horses? Many residents go horseback riding. Will the Agricultural zoning remain the same? David scared, the conservation land would not he affected. Public Agencies are involved, i.e. the Florida Fish and Wildlife Commission are also concerned and would ultimately be the governing parry. Affordable Housing — is there a provision for Affordable Housing? David stared, No, Affordable housing is not a component of this PUD Hacienda tabus MPUD. PU DZ-200&AR- 10146 Page 24 of 26 July 21. 2011 rCPC Revised; 7113111 Paget Page -183- Packet Pg. 566 �D.d 10/2 /2011 It rn tl—%% Eenfield Corridor — Will the BenfieId Corridor start up again and if so, will Hacienda be expected to fund the development. Rich stated, We, do not know what the future haids, but we are not required to fumd the future roadway. Ti a line for Construction — -Rich starer!, they are currently going through Mate Agency approvals. Construction would begin when the market deemed it appropriate. ENVIRONMINTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAQ RE OMMENDATIOX: The Environmental Advisory Council {EAR) reviewed this project on June 1, 2011. The EAC voted 5 tO 0 to recommend approval subject to the conditions of approval contained in the EAC Staff Deport which are listed below: 1) The developer shall submit are updated listed species survcy prior to the next Development Order_ The developer shall coordinate installation of the Sabal Palm culvert crossings and associated spreader swales with Collier County and the South Florida Water Iv magement District and to occur prior to the first pre]irninary acceptance. Conditions reflecting those requirements have been included in the PUD document as 6e recommendation from the EAC was the same for both the DRI and the PUD petitions. Sty' and the applicant are of the opinion that it is more appropriate to place these requirements in the PUD docummt. as the issues being addressed arc loca.i issues, COUNTY ATTDY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney Office has reviewed the staff report for this petition on July 6, 2011, RECOMMENDATION-. Zoning and Land Development Review Services staff recommends that the Coilier County Planning Commission forward Petition PUDZ-PUDZ-A-10146 to the BCC with a recommendation of approval subject to stab's conditions of approval as listed beginning on page 11, and ffiyher limited to the following actions on the deviations: Appro-val of Deviations 2, 5, 7, 8 and ; Approval with Deviation 3 with the stipulation that the developer provide the number of existing model home/units as part of the application mated a] for every development order; Approval of Deviation 4 with the stipulation that the boundary marker signs sha11 be limited such that the sign copy is limited to the overall project name and its logo, and further limited to placement only on roadways that function as arterial or collector roadways; Denial of Deviations ## 1 and b. Hadenda Lakes MPUD, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 July 21. 2011 CCPC Revised; 'III 3111 Page 25 of 20 Packet Page -194- Packet Pg. 567 3.D.d 10/2512011 Ite PREPARED BY: JAY DVSELFM, AICP, mINCIPAL PLANNER DEPARTMENT OF LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REVIEWED BY: RA ND V. BELLOWS, ZONING MANAGER DEPARTMENT OF LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ijo�,, -, z��L L LLkM D. 1,01tlNZ, M, F.E.. DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES APPROVED BY: III ASAL4�N TDA, DE TRAT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DI ISION f DATE i —(i DATE 07.1.2o DATE DATE r Tentatively scheduled for the September 13, 011 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Hacienda Lakes MPUD, PUDZ-2O06-AR-10146 July 21. 2U11 C PC Revised; 7(7111 Packet Page -185- Page B of 26 Packet Pg. 568 3.D.e NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING The public is invited to attend a neighborhood information meeting held by RVi Planning + Landscape Architecture, Inc. on behalf of Hacienda North Apartments, LLC at the following time and location: Monday, April 22, 2024, at 5:30 p.m. Collier County South Regional Library 8065 Lely Cultural Pkwy #9005, Naples, FL 34113 Meeting Room A Attending virtually is also available via Zoom. Please visit www.zoom.us, click on "Join A Meeting" in the top right corner, and enter Zoom Meeting ID: 859 9359 9294, Passcode: 0000. Please be advised that Hacienda North Apartments, LLC has filed an application (PL20230016103) with Collier County. This application is seeking approval of an Insubstantial Change to a Planned Unit Development (PDI). The Application will allow for the reduction of the minimum square footage allowed for multifamily units to 650 square feet and to provide for clarifying language to a transportation commitment that was intended to be temporary. The portion of the Hacienda Lakes MPUD which is subject to this request comprises of 20.21 +/- acres and is generally located on the northeast corner of the intersection of Collier Boulevard and Brighton Boulevard in unincorporated Collier County, Florida. PROJECT LOCATION MAP M LL Subject Property Oc 11 14 WE VALUE YOUR INPUT The purpose and intent of this Neighborhood Information Meeting is to provide the public with notice of an impending zoning application and to foster communication between the applicant and the public. The expectation is that all attendees will conduct themselves in such a manner that their presence will not interfere with the orderly progress of the meeting. Business and property owners and residents are welcome to attend the presentation and discuss the project with the owners' representatives. If you are unable to attend this meeting, but have questions or comments, they can be directed to: RVi Planning + Landscape Architecture, Inc. c/o Josephine Medina 28100 Bonita Grande Dr., Suite 305, Bonita Springs, FL 34135 (239) 908-3421 OR JmedinaQRVi Planning. com m c� J c a� c� x 0 a M O r O O O M N O N J a LO r 0 rn N Packet Pg. 569 3.D.e IV April 5, 2024 RE: Hacienda Lakes MPUD PDI PDI-PL20230016103 Dear Property Owner Please be advised that Hacienda North Apartments, LLC has filed an application (PL20230016103) with Collier County. This application is seeking approval of an Insubstantial Change to a Planned Unit Development (PDI). The Application will allow for the reduction of the minimum square footage allowed for multifamily units to 650 square feet and to provide for clarifying language to a transportation commitment that was intended to be temporary. The portion of the Hacienda Lakes MPUD which is subject to this request comprises of 20.21 +/- acres and is generally located on the northeast corner of the intersection of Collier Boulevard and Brighton Boulevard in unincorporated Collier County, Florida (see attached project location map). In compliance with the Land Development Code requirements, a Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held to provide you an opportunity to hear a presentation about this application and ask questions. The Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held on Monday April 22, 2024, at 5:30 p.m. at the Collier County South Regional Library, 8065 Lely Cultural Pkwy #9005, Naples, FL 34113, Meeting Room A. Attending virtually is also available via Zoom. Please visit www.zoom.us, click on "Join A Meeting" in the top right corner, and enter Zoom Meeting ID: 859 9359 9294, Passcode: 0000. The purpose and intent of this Neighborhood Information Meeting is to provide the public with notice of an impending zoning application and to foster communication between the applicant and the public. The expectation is that all attendees will conduct themselves in such a manner that their presence will not interfere with the orderly progress of the meeting. Should you have questions prior to the meeting, please contact me directly at (239) 908- 3421 or JMedina(a-)_RViPlanning.com Thank you, RVi Planning + Landscape Architecture Josephine Medina, AICP Project Manager RV Planning + Landscape Architecture • 28100 Bonita Grande Drive, Sutie 305 • Bonita Springs, FL 34135 • 239. • www.rviplanning.com Packet Pg. 570 3.D.e C= PROJECT LOCATION MAP L-S Subject Property 1 Azalea ParkCilr i � RM Planning + Landscape Architecture 1 2 of 2 Hacienda Lakes MPUD (PDI) PL20230016103 Packet Pg. 571 3.D.e ll Memorandum To: Eric Ortman, Collier County Zoning Division From: Josephine Medina, AICP, RVi Planning + Landscape Architecture, Inc. Date: May 23, 2024 Subject: Hacienda Lakes MPUD PDI (PL20230016103) Neighborhood Information Meeting Summary RVI Planning + Landscape Architecture, Inc. and Hacienda North Apartments, LLC conducted a neighborhood informational meeting (NIM) for the Hacienda Lakes Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) Insubstantial Change to a PUD (PDI). The meeting was held on Monday, May 21, 2024, at 5:30 p.m. at the Shepards of the Glades Church, 6020 Rattlesnake Hammock Road, Naples, FL 34113. Approximately ten (10) attendees came to the meeting, including Collier County Staff, the applicant and the applicant's project team. Additionally, three (3) attendees participated via Zoom. A copy of the legal notice, affidavit of publication, a copy of the letter sent to the surrounding property owners and a list of the surrounding property owners are attached as Exhibit "B". Aerial Map and Master Concept Plan Boards attached as Exhibit "C" were presented at the meeting. Josephine Medina with RVi Planning + Landscape Architecture went through a eight (8) page slide, Exhibit "D" was run through identifying the location of the request, the existing MPUD approved, the request to reduce the minimum floor area from 750 SF to 650 SF and to allow for clarification of a temporary condition that limited the Hacienda Lakes North POD C area to 300 PM Peak hour trips to go away subject to the commitment to construct Benfield (known as Hacienda Boulevard). The process for PDI application was explained including and anticipated HEX hearing date of June 13, 2024. The following questions were asked as part of the meeting (Zoom meeting questions and responses have been provided as Exhibit "A"): 1. What does this request do as far as density how many more apartment units can you get with this? Response: It just makes a better design building and how the floor plan is laid out giving more outdoor living space. The unit count is already established by the approved zoning. No change in density. RVi Planning + Landscape Architecture • 28100 Bonita Grande Drive, Sutie 305 • Bonita Springs, FL 34135 • 239. • www.rviplanning.com Packet Pg. 572 3.D.e 2. What is the density of the particular community? Response: 300 total units. Six buildings total 40-60 units per building 3. Will the building next to it be the same size with same amount of affordable? Response: Actually, a small percentage of them are affordable the most prominent are market rate 4. What is the market rate of the units? Response: 1-bedroom like around $2,000. And a discussion regarding affordable housing occurred regarding whether these units would be rented to people who live in Collier County and if this was truly for first responders. 5. Questions about surrounding development were asked. Response: The explained the green buildings north of the 7-11 east of Collier Boulevard was to be An assisted living facility. 6. Asked about the temporary restriction on PM Peak hour trips and proposed connection? Response: Make sure that Hacienda Boulevard gets established before the temporary restriction goes away they want to make sure there is better interconnectivity in the community. Once this section of road is connected ultimately Hacienda Boulevard will be a connected roadway. 7. Is the road going to be finished before Seven Shores finishes their development. I was told that was going to be another 5 years. Response: It was indicated that a section adjacent to Seven Shores was going to be required to be developed but nothing further north would be built out as part of the requirement for Seven Shores. The south area of the Hacienda Boulevard is required to be built in order to open certain units on further southeast of the request. 8. Questions regarding the surrounding development were asked. Response: Developments around the property were addressed to the best of the project team's ability. This included questions regarding a Costco that has been announced to be developed in the area which the project team identified they had no information on. The public was provided with contact information of the project team to help address any questions that may come up from now and the HEX hearing date. The meeting concluded at approximately 5:50 pm. RVi Planning + Landscape Architecture 1 2 of 2 Hacienda Lakes MPUD PDI Packet Pg. 573 3.D.e EXHIBIT A 11 ZOOM Chat Transcript 17:47:36 From Mary Gould to Everyone: Where will we be able to view the recording 17:48:02 From Josephine Medina to Everyone: Yes. If you leave your email I can send it to you 17:48:29 From Mary Gould to Josephine Medina(direct message): Mmgl354@gmail.com 17:48:36 From Josephine Medina to Everyone: or you can email me at Jmedina@rviplanning.com 17:51:12 From Norine McDevitt to Everyone: how tall are the buildings and will each only have 50 units. 17:52:32 From Josephine Medina to Everyone: roof height 45 feet 17:53:58 From Josephine Medina to Everyone: 300 units 6 buildings about it will be a mix around 48 and 55 each 17.55:00 From Mary Gould to Josephine Medina(direct message): Has costco purchased the land 17:55:05 From Norine McDevitt to Everyone: thank you 17.55:39 From Mary Gould to Everyone: Has Costco purchased the land 17:56:26 From Josephine Medina to Mary Gould(direct message): We do not have any knowledge of the Costco development unfortunately to relay any information RVi Planning + Landscape Architecture • 28100 Bonita Grande Drive, Sutie 305 • Bonita Springs, FL 34135 • 239. • www.rviplanning.com Packet Pg. 574 EXHIBIT BEXHIBIT B NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING 3.D.e The public is invited to attend a neighborhood information meeting held by RVi Planning + Landscape Architecture, Inc. on behalf of Hacienda North Apartments, LLC at the following time and location: Tuesday, May 21, 2024, at 5:30 p.m. Shepherd of the Glades Church 6020 Rattlesnake Hammock Road, Naples, FL 34122 Attending virtually is also available via Zoom. Please visit www.zoom.us, click on "Join A Meeting" in the top right corner, and enter Zoom Meeting ID: 859 9359 9294, Passcode: 0000. Please be advised that Hacienda North Apartments, LLC has filed an application (PL20230016103) with Collier County. This application is seeking approval of an Insubstantial Change to a Planned Unit Development (PDI). The Application will allow for the reduction of the minimum square footage allowed for multifamily units to 650 square feet and to provide for clarifying language to a transportation commitment that was intended to be temporary. The portion of the Hacienda Lakes MPUD which is subject to this request comprises of 20.21 +/- acres and is generally located on the northeast corner of the intersection of Collier Boulevard and Brighton Boulevard in unincorporated Collier County, Florida. PROJECT LOCATION MAP II I L-� Subject Property WE VALUE YOUR INPUT The purpose and intent of this Neighborhood Information Meeting is to provide the public with notice of an impending zoning application and to foster communication between the applicant and the public. The expectation is that all attendees will conduct themselves in such a manner that their presence will not interfere with the orderly progress of the meeting. Business and property owners and residents are welcome to attend the presentation and discuss the project with the owners' representatives. If you are unable to attend this meeting, but have questions or comments, they can be directed to: RVi Planning + Landscape Architecture, Inc. c/o Josephine Medina 28100 Bonita Grande Dr., Suite 305, Bonita Springs, FL 34135 (239) 908-3421 OR Jmedina(@RViPlannina.com m c� J c� c a� c� x 0 a M O r O O O M N O N J a LO r O OD N Packet Pg. 575 3.D.e LocaliQ Florida GANNETT AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Waldrop Engineering P.A. Alexis Crespo ATTN: Alexis Crespo RVI Planning, Inc 28100 Bonita Grande DR STE 305 Bonita Springs FL 34135-6219 STATE OF WISCONSIN, COUNTY OF BROWN Before the undersigned authority personally appeared, who on oath says that he or she is the Legal Advertising Representative of the Naples Daily News, a newspaper published in Collier County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being a Legal Ad in the matter of Classified Legal CLEGL, was published on the publicly accessible website of Collier and Lee Counties, Florida, or in a newspaper by print in the issues of, on: 05/05/2024 Affiant further says that the website or newspaper complies with all legal requirements for publication in chapter 50, Florida Statutes. Subscribed and sworn to before me, by the legal clerk, who is personally known to me, on 05/05/2024 Leg Jerk Notary, State un rown /C My commission expires Publication Cost: $707.60 Order No: 10142188 Customer No: 1125689 PO #: THIS IS NOT AN INVOICE! Please do not use this form for payment remittance. NANCY HEYRMAN Notary Public State of Wisconsin # of Copies: 1 PO Box 631244 Cincinnati, OH 45263-1244 Page 1 of 2 Packet Pg. 576 3.D.e NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING The public is invited to attend a neighborhood information meeting held by RM Planning + Landscape Architecture, Inc. on behalf of Hammock Park Development, LLC at the following time and location: Monday, May 20, 2024, at 5:30 p.m. Shepherd of the Glades Church 6020 Rattlesnake Hammock Road, Naples, FL 34122 Attending virtually is also available via Zoom. Please visit www zoom.us, click on "Join A Meeting" in the top right corner, and enter Zoom Meeting ID: 844 8688 4154, Passcode: 0000. Please be advised that Hammock Park Development, LLC has filed an application (PL20240000770) with Collier County_ This application is seeking approval of an Insubstantial Change to a Planned Unit Development (PDI). The Application one (1) new deviation (Deviation #8), specifically to allow a commercial center with 7 tenants/units and 15,000 SF of floor area or more to be treated as a shopping center for the purposes of parking calculations. The portion of the Hammock Park MPUD which is subject to this request comprises of 2.75 +/- acres and is generally located on the northeast corner of Collier Boulevard (CR 951) and Rattlesnake Hammock Road an incorporated Collier County, Florida WE VALUE YOUR INPUT The purpose and intent of this Neighborhood Information Meeting is to provide the public with notice of an impending zoning application and to foster communication between the applicant and the public. The expectation is that all attendees will conduct themselves in such a manner that their presence will not interfere with the orderly progress of the meeting. Business and property owners and residents are welcome to attend the presentation and discuss the project with the owners' representatives. If you are unable to attend this meeting, but have questions or comments, they can be directed to: RV Planning + Landscape Architecture, Inc. c/o Josephine Medina 6 28100 Bonita Grande Dr., Suite 305, Bonita Springs, FL 34135 (239) 908-3421 OR Jmedina@RViPlanning.com M O O T O O M N O N J a II r Q Packet Pg. 577 3.D.e ITV May 3, 2024 RE: Hacienda Lakes MPUD PDI PDI-PL20230016103 Dear Property Owner: Please be advised that Hacienda North Apartments, LLC has filed an application (PL20230016103) with Collier County. This application is seeking approval of an Insubstantial Change to a Planned Unit Development (PDI). The Application will allow for the reduction of the minimum square footage allowed for multifamily units to 650 square feet and to provide for clarifying language to a transportation commitment that was intended to be temporary. The portion of the Hacienda Lakes MPUD which is subject to this request comprises of 20.21 +/- acres and is generally located on the northeast corner of the intersection of Collier Boulevard and Brighton Boulevard in unincorporated Collier County, Florida (see attached project location map). In compliance with the Land Development Code requirements, a Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held to provide you an opportunity to hear a presentation about this application and ask questions. The Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held on Tuesday, May 21, 2024, at 5:30 p.m. at the Shepherd of the Glades Church, 6020 Rattlesnake Hammock Road, Naples, FL 34122. Attending virtually is also available via Zoom. Please visit www.zoom.us, click on "Join A Meeting" in the top right corner, and enter Zoom Meeting ID: 859 9359 9294, Passcode: 0000. The purpose and intent of this Neighborhood Information Meeting is to provide the public with notice of an impending zoning application and to foster communication between the applicant and the public. The expectation is that all attendees will conduct themselves in such a manner that their presence will not interfere with the orderly progress of the meeting. Should you have questions prior to the meeting, please contact me directly at (239) 908- 3421 or JMedinaa-RViPlannina.com Thank you, RVi Planning + Landscape Architecture Josephine Medina, AICP Project Manager RVi Planning + Landscape Architecture • 28100 Bonita Grande Drive, Sutie 305 • Bonita Springs, FL 34135 • 239. • www.rviplanning.com Packet Pg. 578 3.D.e C= PROJECT LOCATION MAP L-S Subject Property 1 Azalea ParkCilr i � RVi Planning + Landscape Architecture 1 2 of 2 Hacienda Lakes MPUD (PDI) PL20230016103 Packet Pg. 579 3.D.e BHEG SEVEN SHORES LLC FORT WASHINGTON, PA 19034 --- 0 HACIENDA NORTH APARTMENTS LLC FORT MYERS, FL 33912 --- 0 SD SAN MARINO LLC STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 VERONAWALK HOMEOWNERS ASSO INC NAPLES, FL 34114 --- 0 BRIGHTON LAND LLC FORT MYERS, FL 33912 --- 0 HARTLEY LAND LLC FT MYERS, FL 33192 --- 0 TOLL SOUTHEAST LP COMPANY INC BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 SAPPHIRE COVE HO ASSOC INC NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S NAPLES, FL 34104 --- 0 NAPLES CLUB ESTATES % ASSET RECOVERY GROUP 2520 CORAL WAY #2515 CORAL GABLES, FL 33145 --- 0 BONITA FLORES I LLC KITCHENER N2E OH2 CANADA AZURE AT HACIENDA LAKES NAPLES, FL 34114 Packet Pg. 580 3.D.e Notice: This data belongs to the Collier County Property Appraiser's Office (CCPA). Therefore, the recipient agrees not to represent this data to anyone as other than CCPA provided data The recipient may not transfer this data to others without consent from the CCPA. Petition: PL20230016103 I Buffer: 500' 1 Date: 5/2/24 1 Site Location: 48590010041 � NAME1 � NAME2 NAME3 NAME4 NAM NAME6 BHEG SEVEN SHORES LLC 1140 VIRGINIA DR FORT WASHINGTON, PA 19034 --- 0 BRIGHTON LAND LLC 7742 ALICO RD FORT MYERS, FL 33912 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S NAPLES, FL 34104 --- 0 HACIENDA NORTH APARTMENTS LLC 7742 ALICO RD FORT MYERS, FL 33912 --- 0 HARTLEY LAND LLC 7742 ALICO ROAD FT MYERS, FL 33912 --- 0 NAPLES CLUB ESTATES HOMEOWNERS'S ASSOCIATION INC % ASSET RECOVERY GROUP 2520 CORAL WAY #2515 CORAL GABLES, FL 33145 --- 0 SD SAN MARINO LLC 2639 PROFESSIONAL CIR STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 TOLL SOUTHEAST LP COMPANY INC 24201 WALDEN CENTER DR #204 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 BONITA FLORES I LLC #1-35 TRILLIUM DR KITCHENER N2E OH2 CANADA VERONAWALK HOMEOWNERS ASSO IN 8090 SORRENTO LANE #1 NAPLES, FL 34114 --- 0 SAPPHIRE COVE HO ASSOC INC 4670 CARDINAL WAY NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 AZURE AT HACIENDA LAKES 8808 SANIT LUCIA DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34114 m ca J cC c a� .v ca 2 d M 0 r O O O M N O N J d LO r O OD F4 Packet Pg. 581 Hacienda Lakes MPUD mailing list EXHIBIT CEXHIBIT B 3.D.e HACIENDA LAKES MPUD INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE (PDI) NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING MAY 217 2024 PDI llxfi Open the Outdoors Packet Pg. 582 PROPERTY OVERVIEW % k:%A 1� AWAA A Ar - [I Hacienda Lakes MPUD/DRI — 2,262 acres ❑ Currently approved for: ❑ 1,760 Residential Dwelling Units ❑ Conversions for RV Park and Senior Housing/Assisted Living ❑ 327,500 sq ft Retail Commercial ❑ 70,000 sq ft Professional/Medical Office ❑ 135 Hotel Rooms ❑ 140,000 sq ft Business Park or Education Facility ❑ Public School, Swamp Buggy Attraction, Junior Deputy HACIENDA LAKES MPUD- I �`�' PDI Open the Outdoors Project Location , D1!V I!I FA0WE01 I I I � I 1 I I I I ' r•— — P. _PRESERVE TRACT .4,NDD iv . gat - - - - -J_TUREI JNDEVELD?ED' ' NUMRLIN RPUD t '1 O - - - - - L R Ll1 l R R R' �. R WILLOWRUN RPUD L 'SEENOTE84 R • R PRESERVE y FlSU6LY 5AC. R �. x+- TRACT I MINLT�Ig^PUD MCIENDh LI(1(ESPIt'A'y.. ... ... .. ..... �/ !� � -.m de D.f - bl�' sp• � 'y I-7JRE s�•� A y uA.AGYtlraEvaDPED �5 1. A�Fm'nsnvi 1.- ' Vm Y�I - — 1' ti nEvELOPT I LwevELOPEO 41, • wg�I..� i'.. AAGRICILTIIiE UNDEVELOPED 01 LAND USE SUMMARY DESIGNATOR LAND USE ACREAGE "C" `I COMMERCIAL 34.16* ACRES 'COM MERCL4L LANDS ENCUMBERED BY PUBLIC ROW TRACT 11251t ACRES 'A' ATTRACTION 47.27t AC R ES RESIDENTIAL 447.86d ACRES "BP" BUSINESS PARK 35.38t ACRES "P` PRESERVE 1546.11t ACRES "PF" PUBLIC FACILITY 1.33t ACRES "J D" JUNIOR DEPUTY 21.62i ACRES "S' SCHOOL ID.55t ACRES "RR.1U" RESIDENTIALIMEDICAL USE 36.82i ACRES "ROW" PU BL IC ROW I EASEMENTS 7D.D4t ACRES TOTAL 2292.14t ACRES ' THE COMBINED TOTAL OF THESE TWO ACREAGES EQUALS THE ACTNIY CENTER ACREAGE OF 38.07 " EXCLUDE THIS ACREAGE WHEN TOTALING PROJ ECT AREA AS IT ISINCLUDED IN THE .ROW'TRACT LEGEND A - ATTRACTIO N TRACT BP - BUSINESS PARK C - COMMERCIAL P - PRESERVE TRACT PF - PUBLIC FACILITIES TRACT (EMS) JD - JUNIOR DEPUTY S SCHOOLS R - RESIDENTIAL TRACT RaAU - RESIDENTIAL! MEDICAL USE ROW - PUBLIC ROW! EASEMENTS PROPOSED PUBIC R.O.W. RESERVATION OR EXISTING ®RELOCATED ACCESS EASEMENTS HOT PROPOSED FOR VACATION cERrBx . � `` IC AGYtlCULTURE I ' � `�'1 � � UNDEVELOPED 111 Iw.wracx Pnarc Nnn,ue�Nn.o JD 1 S L L W .......K.�.�,.®..... C D R7AU L J /AMAICI1LlI1RE .` L ---- — -- -- — — — — — — — — — ..»— -- 1 — �—� � rx � rr � � -- MATCH LINE =SEE SHEET ------------------ gin_+ i HACIENDA LAKES MPUD- PDI lixf i Open the Outdoors ❑ A reduction to the minimum Floor Area (SF) for Multi -family Dwelling units from 750 SF to 650 SF. ❑ The County's definition does not include non - air -conditioned living areas such outdoor patios in the minimum floor area calculation. �l HACIENDA LAKES MPUD- RVi PDI Open the Outdoors ❑ To allow for a clarification language of a temporary condition placed on POC C limiting it 300 PM Peak Hour Trips to go away upon the commitment to construct Benfield (known as Hacienda Boulevard) ❑ No change increase in density, intensity or uses is being proposed therefore no change to overall approved trip generation will occur. 13V i Open the Outdoors pod C 4 1#,t u 9 W� Power L1(w Eamment ersnarr_Hamrn'ack � nsion - ' '9 '' " ' ' . . N 't P1W A T l L Un ft q m WFm W be C*f• V %rctimWRetonYV,. cti 0 �t RDWwrr Sep.■ cq PfrviwsiV Canrtvrtsu Road wrr kgff` "t to tw Const• a cied I AMI ftyvoumpk.Vaoped Am* tot* Dr*%kvW HACIENDA LAKES MPUD- PDI 7 ✓ Filed Insubstantial change to a PUD (PDI) application ✓ Found Sufficient by County Planning Staff ✓ Conduct Required Neighborhood Information Meeting • Hearing Examiner Hearing —June 13 COLLIER COUryry SAC,, GROwrH MANAGCOyERNMENT �'wW.[011ier �,n�MENT OEPARTMENi �RUp NORTH HORSESHbE pR14E INS faaal.i--an FA 3a1oa leCxu6 UBST"I"A'CHANgC TOAPUp Ax {23at rs2. sa xeerlpl t°,aI.13 E d not sndnt [n LOC sub Ch'3G.3 nl fhe gdminrewe Orden Lai_29d1� c°nsidered a su section 10A2.13 E2, aae eew and call be 6asetl ulPon an evaluatb PUDsuhstahan$e includes an On the fi pprOl'al of the Hearn ntial cha Y cha ndings and 8 Exa n of LDC suhsecti n8e tp an °$e that is diteri miner. °n 10.U2.13 appr°ved PUD P a used for the original Ppl a[ring aminer-s e 1 and shall require the ETITION NO ron. approval shall be based PROIE[T NAME DAZE pill,CESSED Tae� vrerrrarxarry Name A"LI[gNT[OWAnIN Of Property IVI Owner(xj; FORMATIDIR Address f Applicant if differem than owner; Telephone; E-Mail Adtlres-[e1L• -State: ZIP: t Name OfARen- Far: Firm; Address: _ Telephone: E-Mail Address: -Cell-Stater � DP: Dn as, ched DETAIL OF REQUEST suhsecti the eq a doe�r,°otthe application, describ 42,13 E ] meet the POD sups a the Insubstantial Reel tantial than Change request, �tl3/b/20]a $e criteria established in iDC Page 1 ot4 HACIENDA LAKES MPUD- 13V' PDI Open the Outdoors HACIENDA LAKES MPUD- PDI lixf i Open the Outdoors EXHIBIT D I 3.D.e I 1' .41 49 4l 'ov Or'.. A&M 6t4 A. awl 411 e al ew all m 1A rC � 7 pill kit Wool , PA I mill • 1 . - .1 1A, PA tJ AF alm pop 4q a l4t- it 4 millyy It �,. , � PK HACIENDA LAKES pKWY LL Al A 411 . oll lit Me— IN ill's RATTLE SNAKE__ HAMMOCK ROAD Al 4 . 76is k'A Am, Ilk irk Vill L- ke j 40 V 4#j JR lot 41 low go Packet Pg. 590 3.D.e U t r z Cu U O N V 00 W L!? .N N U n, O N I I i I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I � I I 1 j A, AGRICULTUREI UNDEVELOPED', WILLOW RUN RPUD I I i I I i I I M I II I I I I R �! II R I L L l L I I R L R �; i R 0I R of L I I I I > I I w I I II BP FIRST PSSIEMBLY 35.38 AC. n R L MINIST,RIFS PUD I I O U I I j I L I I I I PF HACIE_ NDL_ KE_S P_ K_WY---_---- I __----_-I -I-----------i----r--- _ -------- EXISTING SWAMP Q BUGGY BUILDING zrz \I1 z 1 !60' HAC;IEND4 jI OIj -----ti -- - ! LAKESPKWY I I w jU I w EXTENSION; Az RESERVATION I o Iw �' I '�---I - ---- - - i I I I \ w w _ �I � ! ! j j EXISTING w a j I I SWAMP ��----A;-fkGf�IEi�tTURE I I BUGGY 1 �----------------------------------� I UN D EV ELO P ED j j TRACK I I I I---------- J------------ i L--------- - --------- II �' L_- - i ' II GOOD TURN 1 I PRESERV�I L TRACT CENTER MPUD ---tI ---- I L_____________ _ _,- i I 0 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I P, PRESERVE I I TRACT �I wl �i o (D LL Z If w (D ILL H wJ IQ o C) w i� w : -- E o z I LLI QI X C Nm I G I..V I WILLOW RUN RPUD I *SEE NOTE #4 P PRESERVE I ; I ; TRACT I „ 120' RESERVATION I I L- ,�� 1�� 1_ =- PR1I__ EIII S1I__ ERI_ VE\,- RACT-1- I I ID IHAMMOCKPARK j '! MCMULLEN S _ COMMERCE I II UNDEVELOPED !1 1 CENTER CPUD --RARATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK EXT. --- - - - - ----------� - -- -- L Now I , I L j I R/M U L L I c I c R \ R I I I \ L \ \\\ I I I I L I I R I A, AGRICULTURE UNDEVELOPED A, AGRICULTURE UNDEVELOPED P =, 7 PRESERVE TRACT RI I I I I ' A, AGRICULTURE UNDEVELOPED LAND USE SUMMARY DESIGNATOR LAND USE ACREAGE licit * COMMERCIAL 34.16± ACRES *COMMERCIAL LANDS ENCUMBERED BY PUBLIC ROW TRACT **2.51± ACRES "A" ATTRACTION 47.27± ACRES "R11 RESIDENTIAL 447.86± ACRES "BP" BUSINESS PARK 35.38± ACRES "Pit PRESERVE 1546.11 ± ACRES "PF" PUBLIC FACILITY 1.33± ACRES "JD" JUNIOR DEPUTY 21.62± ACRES "Sit SCHOOL 19.55± ACRES "R/MU" RESIDENTIAL/MEDICAL USE 38.82± ACRES "ROW" PUBLIC ROW / EASEMENTS 70.04± ACRES TOTAL 2262.14± ACRES * THE COMBINED TOTAL OF THESE TWO ACREAGES EQUALS THE ACTIVITY CENTER ACREAGE OF 36.67 ** EXCLUDE THIS ACREAGE WHEN TOTALING PROJECT AREA AS IT IS INCLUDED IN THE "ROW" TRACT LEGEND A - ATTRACTION TRACT BP - BUSINESS PARK C - COMMERCIAL P - PRESERVE TRACT PF - PUBLIC FACILITIES TRACT (EMS) JD - JUNIOR DEPUTY S - SCHOOLS R - RESIDENTIAL TRACT R/MU - RESIDENTIAL / MEDICAL USE ROW - PUBLIC ROW / EASEMENTS PROPOSED PUBIC R.O.W. RESERVATION RELOCATED OR EXISTING ACCESS EASEMENTS NOT PROPOSED FOR VACATION z 0 A, AGRICULTURE UNDEVELOPED I°" Z W W Z Z W 3 unL� M Q H W ,GO �ul �o o� W � M Z N Q� Z� mo o� O M OQ N N a 0 300 600 1200 SCALE IN FEET FLORIDA CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION 48636 MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET 2 SET NUMBER: SHEET 363-15-E03 1 Packet Pg. 591 J I 6A 1 FRIDAY, MAY 24, 2024 1 NAPLES DAILY NEWS NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Hearing Examiner (HEX) at 9:00 A.M., June 13, 2024, in the Hearing Examiner's meeting room, at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Room 609/610, Naples FL 34104, to consider: PETITION NO. PDI PL20240000770 — HAMMOCK PARK DEVELOPMENT, LLC REQUESTS AN INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO THE HAMMOCK PARK MPUD, ORDINANCE 07-30, AS AMENDED, FOR ONE DEVIATION FROM THE REQUIRED PARKING FOR A MULTITENANT COMMERCIAL BUILDING, PURSUANT TO LDC SECTION 4.05.04.6, TABLE 17, NOT MEETING THE LDC SHOPPING CENTER THRESHOLD, TO BE CALCULATED BASED ON THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EACH USE, TO INSTEAD ALLOW THE PARKING FOR A MULTITENANT COMMERCIAL BUILDING CONTAINING A MINIMUM OF 7 TENANTS/UNITS AND A MINIMUM FLOOR AREA OF AT LEAST 15,000 SQUARE FEET TO BE CALCULATED AS A SHOPPING CENTER (E.G. AT 1 SPACE PER 250 SQUARE FEET), PURSUANT AND SUBJECT TO LDC SECTION 4.05.04.G, TABLE 17, SHOPPING CENTER. THE SUBJECT Z75 +/- ACRE PARCEL IS PART OF THE 19.13 +/- ACRE MPUD AND IS LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF COLLIER BOULEVARD AND RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK ROAD IN SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COWER COUNTY, FLORIDA. Project Location All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. All materials used in presentation before the Hearing Examiner will become a permanent part of the record. Copies of staff report are available one (1) week prior to the hearing. The file can be reviewed at the Collier County Growth Management Community Development Department, Zoning Division; 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL 34104. As to any petition upon which the Hearing Examiner takes action, an aggrieved petitioner may appeal such final action. Such appeal shall be filed per Section 2-88 of the Collier County Code of laws and Ordinances within 30 days of the decision by the Hearing Examiner. An aggrieved non-party may appeal a decision by the Hearing Examiner to the Circuit Court of Collier County within 30 days of the decision. In the event that the petition has been approved by the Hearing Examiner, the applicant shall be advised that he/she proceeds with construction at his/her own risk during this 30-day period. Any construction work completed ahead of the approval authorization shall be at their own risk. As part of an ongoing initiative to encourage public involvement, the public will have the opportunity to provide public comments remotely, as well as in person, during this proceeding. Individuals who would like to participate remotely should register through the link provided within the specific event/meeting entry on the Calendar of Events on the County website at www.colliercountyfl.gov/our-county/visitors/calendar-of-events after the agenda is posted on the County webste. Registration should be done in advance of the public meeting, or any deadline specified within the public meeting notice. Individuals who register Will receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how they can participate remotely in this meeting. Remote participation is provided as a courtesy and is at the user's risk. The County is not responsible for technical issues. For additional information about the meeting, please call Ray Bellows at 252-2463 or email to Ray.Bellows@cclliercountyn.gov. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceetling, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Zoning Division located at 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr, Naples, Florida 34104, (239) 252- 2400, at least two (2) days prior to the meeting. Andrew W. J. Dickman, Esq., AICP Chief Hearing Examiner Collier County, Florida NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice Is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Hearing Examiner (HEX) at 9.00 A.M., June 13. 2024, in the Hearing Examiner's meeting room, at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Room 6091610, Naples FL 341 L. to consider: PETITION NO. PDI PL20230016103 - REQUEST FOR AN INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO THE HACIENDA LAKES MIXED USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD), ORDINANCE NO. 11-41, AS AMENDED, TO DECREASE THE MINIMUM FLOOR AREA SIZE FROM 750 SQUARE FEET TO 650 SQUARE FEET FOR MULTI -FAMILY DWELLING UNITS; AND TO REMOVE THE TEMPORARY 300 PM PEAK HOUR TRIP CAP AT THE CONNECTION TO COWER BOULEVARD BY ADDING THE FOLLOWING SENTENCE TO TRANSPORTATION COMMITMENT N, "UPON THE COMMITMENT OF CONSTRUCTION OF 13ENFIELD ROAD [NOW KNOWN AS HACIENDA BLVD] FOR CONNECTIVITY IN THE NORTH AREA, THIS RESTRICTION SHALL NO LONGERBE IN EFFECT." THE SUBJECT s20-ACRE PARCEL IS PART OF THE s2,262-ACRE MPUD; AND SITS ON THE EAST SIDE OF COWER BOULEVARD IN SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST IN UNINCORPORATED COLLIER COUNTY. A m > Project m Location o Tn c Rattlesnake Hammock RD m d .o C) e All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. All materials used in presentation before the Hearing Examiner will become a permanent part of the record. Copies of staff report are available one (1) week priorto the hearing. The file can be reviewed at the Collier County Growth Management Community Development Department, Zoning Division, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL 34104. As to any petition upon which the Hearing Examiner takes action, an aggrieved petitioner may appeal such final action. Such appeal shall be filed per Section 2-88 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances within 30 days of the decision by the Hearing Examiner An aggrieved non-party may appeal a decision by the Hearing Examiner to the Circuit Court of Collier County within 30 days of the decision. In the event that the petition has been approved by the Hearing Examiner, the applicant shall be advised that he/she proceeds with construction at his/her own risk during this 30-day period. Any construction work completed ahead of the approval authorization shall be at their own risk. As part of an ongoing Initiative to encourage public involvement, the public will have the opportunity to pmvide public comments remotely, as well as in person, during this proceeding. Individuals who would like to participate remotely should register through the link provided within the specific went/meeting entry on the Calendar of Events on the County website at www.eollie=untyfl.gov/our ounty/visaors/mlendar-of-events after the agenda is posted on the County website. Registration should be done in advance of the public meeting, or any deadline specified within the public meeting notice. Individuals who register will receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how they can Participate remotely in this meeting. Remote participation is provided as a courtesy and is at the user's risk. The County Is not responsible for technical Issues. For additional information about the meeting, please call Ray Bellows at 252-2463 or email to Ray.Bellows®colliescountyn.gov. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate In this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Zoning Division located at 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr, Naples, Florda 34104, (239) 252- 2400. at least two (2) days prior to the meeting. Andrew W. J. Dickman, Esq., AICP mu Chief Hearing Examiner Collier County, Florida L I. 3.D.f Packet Pg. 592 3.D.f (CHAPTER 8, COLLIER COUNTY ADMINTISTRATIVE CODE FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT) A zoning sign(s) must be posted by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent on the parcel for a minimum of fifteen (15) calendar days in advance of the first public hearing and said sign(s) must be maintained by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent through the Board of County Commissioners Hearing. Below are general guidelines for signs, however these guidelines should not be construed to supersede any requirement of the LDC. For specific sign requirements, please refer to the Administrative Code, Chapter 8 E. 1. The sign(s) must be erected in full view of the public, not more than five (5) feet from the nearest street right-of-way or easement. 2. The sign(s) must be securely affixed by nails, staples, or other means to a wood frame or to a wood panel and then fastened securely to a post, or other structure. The sign may not be affixed to a tree or other foliage. 3. The petitioner or the petitioner's agent must maintain the sign(s) in place, and readable condition until the requested action has been heard and a final decision rendered. I€ the sign(s) is destroyed, lost, or rendered unreadable, the petitioner or the petitioner's agent must replace the sign(s NOTE: AFTER THE SIGN HAS BEEN POSTED, THIS AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE SHOULD BE RETURNED NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORKING DAYS BEFORE THE FIRST HEARING DATE TO THE ASSIGNED PLANNER. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER BEFORE THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, PERSONALLY APPEARED i WHO ON OATH SAYS THAT HE/SHE HAS POSTED PROPER NOTICE AS REQU 4'1) BY SECTION 10.03,00 O COLLIER COUNTY LAN DEVELOPMENT CODE ON THE PARCEL COVERED IN PETITION NUMBER 20 00 Cbp chi GVava�e &Qe �kirte AT 6P�PLICANR'AGENT STREET OR P.U. BOX us NAME ITYPED OR PRINTED) CITY, STATE ZIP STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF GOLMRPINELLAS The foregoing instrument was sworn to and subscribed before me this 29th day of May , 2024 , by Josephine Medina , personally known to me or who produced is personals known to me as identification and who di.d/AKW take an oath. ,t►ia� "'• SANDRA KAY FABRM0 p Notary Public - State of Florida Commission # HH 370063 or My Comm. Expires Afar 6, 2027 Bonded through National Notary Assn. My Commission Expires: (Stamp with serial number) Signature of Notary Public Sandra_K. Fabrizio Printed Name of Notary Public Q Rev. 3/4/2015 Packet Pg. 593 i 1 F •� " - -• •�. ti ,� ti T' : +� L } �+ - M k ; �'� - r'—J+`$, ff.- •�. '- sl ' ' ' 'k �'+{_•I'7. 4 1 Y Jrf_ r,'f A�Ni rf r Y tr�smay' �''T f Li R ry. f� '.ti fir` ti.(a+•� F J ti 1' r _'ti,,,,•_ - i' t , f Y • '.� +{ r #� ";sy^. ,�� ' r ' �, _ r `4 _ r +� k• ' sJ •�. i. Al ILI r'a/ Y f litityr i} It qrt' { �4r ,k,At p IPUBLIC HEARING NOTICE - y� HACIENDA LAKES MPLID i INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE ; Petition No. PL20230016103 1 + j. } FYEric 44;h ..o Collier County Growth Management Planner ! F rI s - 1032 •4L ^ _ F Jv _. t +y ' v *. ' •� {, v i� + •- v } J r y — �. - J � 1ti�� +'--!'? _J+R v }', T j. �T ..,� .' r _ r I .. y :r��G•'L�.-�ti l •- 1 _ ti� - w ,' �4r•y� .y •r'•,r - }'-x" •r. �`-'•_ x �M1#� — 'r -vim - �I -.' _ _ F r , All v�.. v ~•� i '� �• •i1 I ••. r r '� - .� _ ' , .11 L t , .. .. y .r � } i - ._ • - -j I 1 ' � t h r + t. L ' •• � . � i�' • J � v , rr � _ ,.,�' � � i Fr.. � - r 3 1�,', ''�' I• - � F �•i •' ` J.r - � .' _ �,I : .� ;r+k �i�fy � �'.r S +iF � •J' ` ' �� •' _?'~h 1 - v; I 1 ' , F}• f _� F k ki 1 1 t 1, t 1. L-, 'J .'•f .1�• S•,-� tiJ+•�'J' f •'� r, •,{ A �. ' I , i:'a •y h�v f. I ''� "", Ja r _ ,• .. r' L `•.' kJy7 L, '��. S •+M1� ti +� II r �' s,"f• k ✓ 1 f } , ; �� - F v _ + � } ' +L •' �i I :'. �.. +�•v• r 1 i •• ' � � • �f r �kJe� 'S• _ _ � k _ I . � _ r � , ��',� . •� r,• . .s{ .i _ f ' Li r � �I • r J � � .. . ^rt•� 11 �^ �; + • � I F I� I v. �• ' 'tiy�j � � � � .. "'F • r - � ' ti'1 � �'' _; .� - _ - +, �, M1+• .. •� �ti• � _� � �, ••y , k _ .+ J•} �5 ��:1 �y_17}.� ti•'3-_ � .?�yY' _,�V;q s h, I ' ;• ter' ' ,} ki•{'•.'• r .y,' r•y j ;r k ti y•, x� 1•:' .�! _ F,• 7 • tom$ f! �^ + '' L•k , y•�f I r 5• •I I_'�,'_ _., y _ ' S - .'' Il •� 11' - +,�T;.c —,•t� •S ••'�+� ,I `, -: �•� .yv 4` -:•�' ' .. ,rr �•J' � � �f � 1;. � � i; i ,•r . '� :y• 1 a � s r � • 'j 'S', 'J, r• �Y .��', �.: f'• �,M": � + �i .. �M1�, •I•f t'r `��7'jY''�. � .+"'•C t•r� y• ~. I �• '--'ti �''L' 'I ti,, _r• t ' j1]]�f��3 ' r �; } M1 . iL•' L� ' +#,+ Y ,r�}.} ' +� . •I .4 *Y1 �iYr �F h ..\ �L .�4YL• y S f LF �{•} _ }, �lrl•+{Li•-"� 'F•IArl.l 7iv ev� i ` - 1' L 441 • , FN Y ,a+L i rr �•• R r' S � �{,r �r�� .!!':r r�•iLrr+R. '.�;: ••��•••i�' .�`.�� r � - M1•.�• '' �;'4.��, ��•� - '}r•'� '{ '�' l•� j l' �1', _•+r •: •' •ti, . .1' Ilk r , •�'}. ! _ 5 Z. 7� '�� 'I�y JT�i� �•� k' Y +�•4f - �l• � • - i � 4 ter' � -� JI7}y� •- - •. � j' - o- �5 � � .�, •' -' a I _ , •+ �+, j .. I _ f }` 3• 'fps > r ' , i - - . _ti r� �.ti � .•yt ti - T. L?,.. r' ,•;� �. �•; 'x- yy ti +•Y•_ i �y1 rely 'yy � y •3 � 5lF _ y r+' - �' - _ ,,'., ��hM1 ��+�■C7 y � �. ��? r•T•. •��' � {T S 'j �_K7y� - r e� , - -- Y•., '. � F v F - �I_r ��' A S _ v�,•� �3/ `y, •� 4 �' a. � �S �+h t•� } ,,}R � ••F�.. ,y��j �-+h7iw� �; ti"11'.k., :�� _ :til } # �k .}.� # r F .,� ' y �- ' rJ,iti k? 1—Y , .r�• ti� y I r ' ,.J—. -r rl4 n'. ; 'yyjy�Ty_. ^F� ti * LL'�L }. .1'`•,ya'z -�.- L• 't .}�.•?,}_•: +t' ••r• } 4� , r Y {� `� �4t r-i *' f - t•�R { %� F y L17FM' •�M1;tir+ d .F'� . 1 f'r,+ F N'. f y kk i %p I� 7iKi +�i � +. + r,.. �h, �J �� { } �••4i � �' tit'�� r�'•�'' z � + ; ��7 r tia�`• ' �' _ � � + �I if -r � ' �: � }} -t ;i•� a I '�-ti� ^ - # F_•Jr"'++ r �1.� '�4�4 ti. JLP'+ , f r�a 4. r. Fr�y� � r f� lf�G .. _ � rts -_ i r rd� �' � �' ',� ,••�� L ry�� * '� YY 'sL • � 5 J i ' h J110 'Z r I ;F !q A. % % 'k k w I 0 EAR IDA LA 3STAN' Vo. PL2 a 1-3- 2C a hr % %I PT A C" 0 % !47' I f XX k0i; AL7 % Ve r NG NOTICE u I I I Rf w ILr F. '6 -6 AL % % aw .44 vi6 -z L FL Jpr r % % A66 % AA A, A 7r 4 % % W%14— I Wk 6R L % I 06. J117 Oro - AP p % lb A4L L %-L % % Sri .P 4 % % .1 %L . 1,QW. 0 k- % Ir M-- L Lr L Sf %L % "A <v4L % % i\e 7. % 'ALI. L p ? t %