The URL can be used to link to this page

CCLAAC Backup 04/03/2024Conservation Collier Cycle 10, 11, and 12 Property Status Updated March 26, 2024 Total Acres Appraised or Estimate Value* Purchase Price or Estimated Value* Total number of properties 615.60 $14,210,295 $13,833,625 73 280.90 $8,723,050 $8,715,230 15 SUMMARY PAGE PROPERTIES PENDING ACQUISITION* (CYCLE 11B, and 12A) ACQUISITION SUMMARY OF ALL CYCLE 10, 11A, 11B, and 12A PROPERTIES *Estimated Value used in calculations until Purchase Agreement is signed by Seller and scheduled for Collier County Board of County Commissioners meeting ACQUIRED PROPERTIES (CYCLE 10, 11A, 11B, and 12A) 28.A.4 Packet Pg. 589 Attachment: 4.A. AAL status of all properties (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Conservation Collier Cycle 10, 11, and 12 Property Status Updated March 26, 2024 Property Name Preserve Size (ac)Appraised Value Closing Amount Acquisition Status Aguilar, Jorge Panther Walk Preserve 1.14 $40,000 $40,000 Closed 2/13/23 Arias, Eladio Dr. Robert H. Gore III Preserve 3.16 $63,000 $52,900 Closed 9/22/23 Arias, Eladio Dr. Robert H. Gore III Preserve 3.78 $66,000 $63,200 Closed 9/22/23 Arnay, Henrietta Panther Walk Preserve 1.14 $30,000 $30,000 Closed 6/16/23 Bailey, Charles E Dr. Robert H. Gore III Preserve 1.14 $25,000 $25,000 Closed 9/20/23 Behnke, Lois Panther Walk Preserve 1.14 $57,000 $57,000 Closed 6/16/23 Blocker, Brian Pepper Ranch Preserve 24.50 $220,000 $220,000 Closed 7/7/23 Burns, Sandra Panther Walk Preserve 1.14 $30,000 $30,000 Closed 1/30/23 Caberera, Mercedes Red Maple Swamp Preserve 9.16 $114,500 $114,500 Closed 3/21/22 Castillo, Jose Red Maple Swamp Preserve 5.41 $89,300 $84,835 Closed 7/14/23 Charles, Paulette Dr. Robert H. Gore III Preserve 1.14 $25,100 $22,500 Closed 6/30/23 Craparo, Stephen Dr. Robert H. Gore III Preserve 1.64 $44,000 $39,600 Closed 9/15/23 D & J Investors Panther Walk Preserve 1.14 $40,000 $40,000 Closed 6/9/23 Dessing, Carol A.Winchester Head Preserve 1.14 $18,810 $18,810 Closed 3/28/22 Fesser, Ivan Winchester Head Preserve 2.27 $56,800 $53,960 Closed 9/1/23 Fleming, Albert Dr. Robert H. Gore III Preserve 1.64 $39,000 $37,500 Closed 9/15/23 Gonzalez, Isabel Panther Walk Preserve 1.14 $50,000 $50,000 Closed 6/16/22 Gorman, Herman and Alice Winchester Head Preserve 1.14 $18,810 $18,810 Closed 9/26/22 Grossman, Barry Panther Walk Preserve 2.73 $63,000 $63,000 Closed 6/16/23 Guerra, Sigrid Red Maple Swamp Preserve 1.14 $20,500 $20,500 Closed 7/7/23 Hackmann, Charles Panther Walk Preserve 2.73 $70,000 $63,000 Closed 12/15/23 Hofmann, Adelaida Dr. Robert H. Gore III Preserve 1.59 $36,000 $36,000 Closed 2/27/23 Hussey Trust North Belle Meade Preserve 256.00 $2,072,500 $2,072,500 Closed 11/14/22 Johnson, Tim R Panther Walk Preserve 1.14 $30,000 $30,000 Closed 1/30/23 Joyce, David Panther Walk Preserve 2.27 $52,000 $52,000 Closed 6/9/23 Joyce, Martin and Elizabeth Panther Walk Preserve 2.27 $61,300 $55,170 Closed 8/17/23 Martinez, Abel Chavez Red Maple Swamp Preserve 2.27 $40,900 $36,000 Closed 8/17/23 CYCLE 10 AAL APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ON JANUARY 25, 2022 CYCLE 10 ACQUIRED PROPERTIES 2 28.A.4 Packet Pg. 590 Attachment: 4.A. AAL status of all properties (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Conservation Collier Cycle 10, 11, and 12 Property Status Updated March 26, 2024 Property Name Preserve Size (ac)Appraised Value Closing Amount Acquisition Status McLaughlin Trust, Geraldine Red Maple Swamp Preserve 4.61 $57,625 $57,625 Closed 3/21/22 Meyer Trust Panther Walk Preserve 1.59 $72,000 $72,000 Closed 1/30/23 Moody Crawford, Jim H Pepper Ranch Preserve 59.79 $505,000 $505,000 Closed 9/22/23 Pena, John Panther Walk Preserve 2.27 $52,000 $52,000 Closed 2/13/23 Popp, Joe Rivers Road Preserve 19.40 $630,000 $630,000 Closed 9/26/22 Quevedo, Odalys Dr. Robert H. Gore III Preserve 1.14 $28,000 $26,600 Closed 7/14/23 Rodriguez (f.k.a. Lopez), Terri Panther Walk Preserve 1.59 $42,900 $38,610 Closed 8/17/23 Ruben Trust Winchester Head Preserve 1.59 $39,800 $39,800 Closed 7/7/23 Rudnick, Carol - Donation Dr. Robert H. Gore III Preserve 1.59 N/A N/A Closed 6/30/22 Salgado, Julio Panther Walk Preserve 2.73 $73,700 $70,110 Closed 8/17/23 Sanchez, PS & NE Panther Walk Preserve 2.73 $63,000 $63,000 Closed 1/30/23 Selvig, Maribeth - Donation Panther Walk Preserve 1.14 N/A N/A Closed 9/26/22 Setser, Carrie, Larry, and Ruby Red Maple Swamp Preserve 5.00 $62,500 $62,500 Closed 3/21/22 Sparkman Tamara Gibson Panther Walk Preserve 1.14 $33,000 $33,000 Closed 7/14/23 Thommen, William F Panther Walk Preserve 5.00 $100,000 $100,000 Closed 1/30/23 Toro, Michael Winchester Head Preserve 1.59 $39,800 $35,820 Closed 6/30/23 Trofatter, Frederick Winchester Head Preserve 1.14 $28,000 $25,650 Closed 9/7/23 Varney, Gail Red Maple Swamp Preserve 1.14 $14,250 $14,250 Closed 2/14/22 Wright, David Panther Walk Preserve 1.14 $30,000 $30,000 Closed 1/30/23 Zani, Paul Dr. Robert H. Gore III Preserve 2.27 $49,900 $49,900 Closed 7/7/23 Zhuang, Joseph Panther Walk Preserve 2.73 $63,000 $63,000 Closed 1/30/23 456.42 $5,457,995 $5,395,650 Total number of properties = 48TOTAL CYCLE 10 ACQUIRED PROPERTIES CYCLE 10 AAL APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ON JANUARY 25, 2022 CYCLE 10 ACQUIRED PROPERTIES, cont'd 3 28.A.4 Packet Pg. 591 Attachment: 4.A. AAL status of all properties (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Conservation Collier Cycle 10, 11, and 12 Property Status Updated March 26, 2024 Property Name Preserve Size (ac)Appraised Value Final Offer Amount Acquisition Status Amaranth Trust, Forrest G N/A 71.16 N/A N/A Property withdrawn Anderson, Charles Panther Walk Preserve 2.27 $64,000 $64,000 Offer not accepted Anderson, Charles Panther Walk Preserve 1.14 N/A N/A Sold to another Argay, Lorraine D Dr. Robert H. Gore III Preserve 7.05 $81,000 $81,000 Offer not accepted Arnold, Emily Pepper Ranch Preserve 5.00 N/A N/A Property withdrawn Arnold, Vanette Panther Walk Preserve 1.14 $30,000 $30,000 Offer not accepted Big Hammock - Area I (Barron Collier Partnership) Pepper Ranch Preserve 257.3 $900,000 $900,000 Offer not accepted Casasierra Realty LLC Winchester Head Preserve 1.14 $25,650 $25,650 Property withdrawn Cedeno, Kenneth Dr. Robert H. Gore III Preserve 2.81 $56,000 $56,000 Offer not accepted Dahche, Ahmand Panther Walk Preserve 5.00 $130,000 $130,000 Offer not accepted D'Angelo, Eugene Dr. Robert H. Gore III Preserve 5.00 $100,000 $100,000 Offer not accepted Erjavec, Eugene Rivers Road Preserve 4.92 $200,000 $200,000 Offer not accepted Eschuk, Shari Rivers Road Preserve 4.78 $180,000 $180,000 Offer not accepted Fernandez, Erik Winchester Head Preserve 1.59 $39,800 $39,800 Offer not accepted Fischer Trust, Addison Marco Island 0.63 N/A N/A Property withdrawn Haughton, Veronica Panther Walk Preserve 2.73 N/A N/A Sold to another Higdon Trust, Garey D Winchester Head Preserve 1.59 $39,800 $35,820 Selling to another Macrina, Kathleen Panther Walk Preserve 1.14 N/A N/A Sold to another Magdalener, Josef Shell Island Preserve 18.73 N/A N/A Property withdrawn Moylan, Paul E Panther Walk Preserve 2.73 $63,000 $63,000 Offer not accepted Ortega, Berardo Panther Walk Preserve 1.14 $30,000 $30,000 Property withdrawn Three Brothers Panther Walk Preserve 2.73 $63,000 $63,000 Offer not accepted WISC Investment - Inlet Dr Marco Island 0.39 $429,000 $429,000 Purchase Agreement not approved by BCC 402.11 $2,431,250 $2,427,270 Total number of properties = 23TOTAL CYCLE 10 A-LIST PROPERTIES THAT WILL NOT BE ACQUIRED CYCLE 10 A-LIST PROPERTIES THAT WILL NOT BE ACQUIRED CYCLE 10 AAL APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ON JANUARY 25, 2022 4 28.A.4 Packet Pg. 592 Attachment: 4.A. AAL status of all properties (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Conservation Collier Cycle 10, 11, and 12 Property Status Updated March 26, 2024 Size (ac)Appraised Value Closing Amount Annecy Marco LLC / Barfield Marco Island 2.13 $3,140,000 $3,140,000 Closed 1/5/24 Berman Trust, R F Dr. Robert H. Gore III Preserve 1.14 $30,000 $28,500 Closed 9/15/23 Fontela, Maricel Aleu Dr. Robert H. Gore III Preserve 1.14 $25,700 $25,700 Closed 12/8/23 Geren, Jonathan North Belle Meade Preserve 7.84 $129,500 $129,500 Closed 1/12/24 Gutierrez, Michael North Belle Meade Preserve 4.88 $85,400 $81,100 Closed 1/12/24 McGinnis, Patricia Panther Walk Preserve 1.14 $45,000 $42,800 Closed 11/17/23 Perez Castro, Pedro Dr. Robert H. Gore III Preserve 1.17 $29,000 $27,600 Closed 1/5/24 Perona, Barbara Winchester Head Preserve 1.59 $39,800 $39,800 Closed 12/1/23 Repola, Andrea Panther Walk Preserve 1.14 $45,000 $42,800 Closed 9/15/23 Scalley, William J and Martha Panther Walk Preserve 1.14 $45,000 $42,800 Closed 11/17/23 Scotti, Mary North Belle Meade Preserve 8.74 $135,500 $128,700 Closed 12/1/23 South Terra Corp Marco Island 0.56 $1,720,000 $1,620,000 Closed 1/5/24 Sponseller, Robert North Belle Meade Preserve 5.00 $90,000 $90,000 Closed 12/8/23 Trigoura, Delsina Dr. Robert H. Gore III Preserve 1.14 $30,000 $30,000 Closed 11/17/23 VanCleave, Matthew Rivers Road Preserve 0.50 $52,500 $52,500 Closed 12/8/23 Vaz, Maurice J Panther Walk Preserve 1.59 $57,500 $57,000 Closed 9/15/23 40.84 $5,699,900 $5,578,800 Total number of properties = 16 Size (ac)Appraised Value Final Offer Amount Agua Colina Marco Island 0.63 $1,120,000 $1,120,000 Purchase Agreement not approved by Board Berman Rev Trust, R F Panther Walk Preserve 1.17 $46,000 $43,700 No longer interested in selling Chestnut, Diane Marco Island 0.53 $627,500 $627,500 Offer not accepted Colon, Donna & Patricia Mack Dr. Robert H. Gore III Preserve 2.27 $39,500 $39,500 Selling to another S & B Properties of Marco LLC Marco Island 0.50 $570,000 $570,000 Offer not accepted Starnes, Hugh Caracara Prairie Preserve 4.54 $250,000 $250,000 Offer not accepted 9.64 $2,653,000 $2,650,700 Total number of properties = 6TOTAL CYCLE 11A A-LIST PROPERTIES THAT WILL NOT BE ACQUIRED CYCLE 11A AAL APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ON DECEMBER 13, 2022 CYCLE 11A ACQUIRED PROPERTIES TOTAL CYCLE 11A ACQUIRED PROPERTIES CYCLE 11A A-LIST PROPERTIES THAT WILL NOT BE ACQUIRED 5 28.A.4 Packet Pg. 593 Attachment: 4.A. AAL status of all properties (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Conservation Collier Cycle 10, 11, and 12 Property Status Updated March 26, 2024 Size (ac)Appraised Value Closing Amount Bailey, Scott and Christopher Winchester Head Preserve 1.59 $39,800 $38,500 Closed 1/19/24 Brewer, Richard N/A 14.78 $451,000 $405,900 Closed 12/15/23 Dibala Wood Trust Dr. Robert H. Gore III Preserve 18.28 $275,000 $261,300 Closed 12/15/23 Dredge Management Assoc LLC Shell Island Preserve 18.73 $1,592,500 $1,512,875 Closed 1/19/24 English Trust Pepper Ranch Preserve 59.01 $515,000 $463,500 Closed 1/19/24 Mooney/Hankins-Colon Winchester Head Preserve 1.59 $39,800 $39,800 Closed 2/16/24 Weir Trust, Celine Dr. Robert H. Gore III Preserve 2.27 $39,500 $37,500 Closed 12/8/23 Williams Nancy Payton Preserve 0.50 $60,000 $60,000 Closed 1/19/24 Wilson Trust Winchester Head Preserve 1.59 $39,800 $39,800 Closed 12/8/23 118.34 $3,052,400 $2,859,175 Total number of properties = 9 Property Name Preserve Size (ac)Appraised/Estimated Value Purchase Price/Estimated Value Acquisition Status Descoteau, Donn & Donna*Dr. Robert H. Gore III Preserve 1.14 $25,100 $25,100 Offer accepted; Purchase Agreement pending Buckley Enterprises*Nancy Payton Preserve 80.00 $640,000 $640,000 Appraisal ordered 81.14 $665,100 $665,100 Total number of properties = 2 Property Name Preserve Size (ac)Appraised/Estimated Value Final Offer Amount/Estimated Value Acquisition Status Khoury Otter Mound Preserve 0.43 N/A N/A Sold to another Lie, Run He Nancy Payton Preserve 0.50 $80,000 $80,000 Offer not accepted Owl Hammock N/A 7,378.00 TBD TBD On-hold pending State of Florida acquisition Relevant Radio, Inc.McIlvane Marsh Preserve 10.46 $126,350 $126,350 Offer not accepted Sit/Chew Nancy Payton Preserve 3.00 $390,000 $390,000 Offer not accepted Smith & Montgomery Dr. Robert H. Gore III Preserve 2.73 N/A N/A Property withdrawn 7,395.12 $596,350 $596,350 Total number of properties = 6 * Estimated Value used in calculations until Purchase Agreement is signed by Seller and scheduled for Collier County Board of County Commissioners meeting CYCLE 11B AAL APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ON FEBRUARY 28, 2023 TOTAL CYCLE 11B A-LIST PROPERTIES THAT WILL NOT BE ACQUIRED CYCLE 11B ACQUIRED PROPERTIES TOTAL CYCLE 11B ACQUIRED PROPERTIES CYCLE 11B PROPERTIES PENDING ACQUISITION TOTAL CYCLE 11B PROPERTIES PENDING ACQUISITION CYCLE 11B A-LIST PROPERTIES THAT WILL NOT BE ACQUIRED 6 28.A.4 Packet Pg. 594 Attachment: 4.A. AAL status of all properties (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Conservation Collier Cycle 10,11, and 12 Property Status Updated March 26, 2024 Size (ac)Appraised Value Closing Amount A & T Kleinberger Rev Trust Dr. Robert H. Gore III Preserve 5.00 $110,000 $104,500 Closed 3/15/24 5.00 $110,000 $104,500 Total number of properties = 1 Property Name Preserve Size (ac)Appraised/Estimated Value Purchase Price/Estimated Acquisition Status Arnold Trust*Dr. Robert H. Gore III Preserve 7.16 $146,780 $146,780 Offer accepted; Purchase Agreement pending Beckert, Marc & Elizabeth* Dr. Robert H. Gore III Preserve 1.14 $23,370 $23,370 Offer accepted; Purchase Agreement pending CDL Naples Investment LLC* Dr. Robert H. Gore III Preserve 2.73 $55,965 $55,965 Offer accepted; Purchase Agreement pending JA Moulton Trust*Dr. Robert H. Gore III Preserve 7.17 $146,985 $146,985 Offer accepted; Purchase Agreement pending Land Genie LLC*Dr. Robert H. Gore III Preserve 2.73 $55,965 $55,965 Offer accepted; Purchase Agreement pending Murawski Trust North Belle Meade Preserve 4.87 $45,000 $42,750 Offer accepted; Purchase Agreement scheduled for 4/9/24 BCC Symphony Properties*N/A 150.00 $7,100,000 $7,100,000 Appraisal Under Review Rodriguez, Mario & Gisela Panther Walk Preserve 5.46 $158,400 $158,400 Offer accepted; Purchase Agreement scheduled for 3/26/24 BCC Taylor, Ernesto & Ana*Dr. Robert H. Gore III Preserve 5.00 $102,500 $102,500 Offer accepted; Purchase Agreement pending Volpe Trust North Belle Meade Preserve 8.50 $109,000 $103,550 Offer accepted; Purchase Agreement scheduled for 4/9/24 BCC Walsh, Nancy*Red Maple Swamp Preserve 1.14 $21,340 $21,340 Offer accepted; Purchase Agreement pending Whittingham Corporation Panther Walk Preserve 1.59 $46,110 $45,990 Offer accepted; Purchase Agreement scheduled for 3/26/24 BCC Woodworth, Richard*Dr. Robert H. Gore III Preserve 2.27 $46,535 $46,535 Offer accepted; Purchase Agreement pending 199.76 $8,057,950 $8,050,130 Total number of properties = 13 Size (ac)Appraised Value Final Offer Amount Aristizabal McIlvane Marsh Preserve 5.00 $20,000 $20,000 Offer declined 5.00 $20,000 $20,000 Total number of properties = 1 * Estimated Value used in calculations until Purchase Agreement is signed by Seller and scheduled for Collier County Board of County Commissioners meeting TOTAL CYCLE 12A PROPERTIES PENDING ACQUISITION CYCLE 12A A-LIST PROPERTIES THAT WILL NOT BE ACQUIRED TOTAL CYCLE 12A A-LIST PROPERTIES THAT WILL NOT BE ACQUIRED CYCLE 12A AAL APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ON OCTOBER 10, 2023 CYCLE 12A ACQUIRED PROPERTIES TOTAL CYCLE 12A ACQUIRED PROPERTIES CYCLE 12A PROPERTIES PENDING ACQUISITION 28.A.4 Packet Pg. 595 Attachment: 4.A. AAL status of all properties (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) 28.A.5 Packet Pg. 596 Attachment: 4.B. Conservation Collier Ordinance 03.26.2024 Adopted Version (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) 28.A.5 Packet Pg. 597 Attachment: 4.B. Conservation Collier Ordinance 03.26.2024 Adopted Version (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) 28.A.5 Packet Pg. 598 Attachment: 4.B. Conservation Collier Ordinance 03.26.2024 Adopted Version (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) 28.A.5 Packet Pg. 599 Attachment: 4.B. Conservation Collier Ordinance 03.26.2024 Adopted Version (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) 28.A.5 Packet Pg. 600 Attachment: 4.B. Conservation Collier Ordinance 03.26.2024 Adopted Version (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) 28.A.5 Packet Pg. 601 Attachment: 4.B. Conservation Collier Ordinance 03.26.2024 Adopted Version (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) 28.A.5 Packet Pg. 602 Attachment: 4.B. Conservation Collier Ordinance 03.26.2024 Adopted Version (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) 28.A.5 Packet Pg. 603 Attachment: 4.B. Conservation Collier Ordinance 03.26.2024 Adopted Version (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) 28.A.5 Packet Pg. 604 Attachment: 4.B. Conservation Collier Ordinance 03.26.2024 Adopted Version (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) 28.A.5 Packet Pg. 605 Attachment: 4.B. Conservation Collier Ordinance 03.26.2024 Adopted Version (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) 28.A.5 Packet Pg. 606 Attachment: 4.B. Conservation Collier Ordinance 03.26.2024 Adopted Version (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) 28.A.5 Packet Pg. 607 Attachment: 4.B. Conservation Collier Ordinance 03.26.2024 Adopted Version (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) 28.A.5 Packet Pg. 608 Attachment: 4.B. Conservation Collier Ordinance 03.26.2024 Adopted Version (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) 28.A.5 Packet Pg. 609 Attachment: 4.B. Conservation Collier Ordinance 03.26.2024 Adopted Version (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) 28.A.5 Packet Pg. 610 Attachment: 4.B. Conservation Collier Ordinance 03.26.2024 Adopted Version (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) 28.A.5 Packet Pg. 611 Attachment: 4.B. Conservation Collier Ordinance 03.26.2024 Adopted Version (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) 28.A.5 Packet Pg. 612 Attachment: 4.B. Conservation Collier Ordinance 03.26.2024 Adopted Version (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) 28.A.5 Packet Pg. 613 Attachment: 4.B. Conservation Collier Ordinance 03.26.2024 Adopted Version (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Advisory Board Application Form Collier County Government 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 800 Naples, FL 34112 (239) 252-8400 Application was received on: 3/19/2024 5:42:50 PM. Name: Bradley Edward Funk Home Phone: 608-963-1785 Home Address: 6070 Hollow Dr City: Naples Zip Code: 34112 Phone Numbers Business: 239-261-6100 E-Mail Address: bradleyefunk@icloud.com Board or Committee: Land Acquisition Advisory Committee Category: Place of Employment: Lutgert Companies How long have you lived in Collier County: 4-5 How many months out of the year do you reside in Collier County: I am a year-round resident Have you been convicted or found guilty of a criminal offense (any level felony or first degree misdemeanor only)? No Not Indicated Do you or your employer do business with the County? No Not Indicated NOTE: All advisory board members must update their profile and notify the Board of County Commissioners in the event that their relationship changes relating to memberships of organizations that may benefit them in the outcome of advisory board recommendations or they enter into contracts with the County. Would you and/or any organizations with which you are affiliated benefit from decisions or 28.A.6 Packet Pg. 614 Attachment: 5.B. Bradley E Funk - App & Supp Questions (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) recommendations made by this advisory board? No Not Indicated Are you a registered voter in Collier County? Yes Do you currently hold an elected office? No Do you now serve, or have you ever served on a Collier County board or committee? No Not Indicated Please list your community activities and positions held: Education: B.A. Experience / Background - 3 years working with the Environmental Protection Agency in developing an Ocean Side Condominium - 3 Years building & developing within the standards of LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) 28.A.6 Packet Pg. 615 Attachment: 5.B. Bradley E Funk - App & Supp Questions (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Applicant Supplemental Information Applicant Name:____Bradley Edward Funk___ Representation of Interests: Please explain your relationship with and business interests relating to the following topics. • Environmental and Conservation: My relationship with environmental and conservation stretch back 36 years. Weekly walks with my Nana through Wisconsin state forests and learning the importance of maintaining a natural habitat for all wildlife became the foundation for my love of the outdoors. Growing up learning to respect the environment carried into my own practices as I began using the trails for training for the sports I participated in. Making sure to always bring a little bag with me as I picked up bottles or wrappers found along my runs to ensure the parks were left better than I found them. Our current home’s back yard currently butts up next to the Rattlesnake Hammock Preserve. While observing the wildlife and plant life over the past 2 years, we can see firsthand the importance of conversation in Collier County. • Agricultural and Business: Agriculture has been a family business for over 100 years. Running a successful farm is learning to plant crops that replenish the soil with nutrients after there’s a harvest of crops that used all the prior nutrients up. This is a natural way boost productivity without having the need for fertilizers that can get into the waterways and seep into the oceans causing unnecessary harm. My experience in business has been a cross between retail, development, and construction. Most recently development and construction in Vero Beach, where our company had acquired a parcel of land that was up for auction by the Township. We’ve since worked with the EPA and local authorities in developing an ocean side community consisting of 12 single family residences and a 12 unit condominium. • Educational: Associates degree from University of Wisconsin B.A. from Florida Gulf Coast University • General Civic and Citizen: General civic activities are currently in community engagement. I enjoy making holiday cards and sending them out to the nursing homes. My fiancé and I have been wanting to get involved more in the coral reef transplant schedule in the keys. It’s not necessarily local to Collier but it’s a special place for us. 28.A.6 Packet Pg. 616 Attachment: 5.B. Bradley E Funk - App & Supp Questions (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Individual Member Expertise, Knowledge or Interest: Please elaborate on any experience, knowledge or interest you have in the following subjects. • Ecology : Education in ecology is continuous although the main amount of learning occurred in late high school/early college. Currently learning about the ecology in the ocean as I hope to help in replenishing food sources for manatee and intercoastal fish. • Conservation: Experience with the conservation includes working with the local community to clean up preservations to ensure they continue to thrive. Knowledge depth in conservation is still at a novice level although my interest to expand that knowledge is tremendous. • Real Estate or Land Acquisition: Real estate has been more of a hobby on a small scale for myself. Scouting small parcels of land that serve as investments. Understanding the full process of land acquisition would be a very high interest. • Land Appraisal: Understanding land appraisal would be a very high interest. As market shifts the only markers I have to go by are from friend’s insights who are in real estate or by taking a sample of land in general area. • Land Management: Working with the EPA and local environmental authorities thru the conception phases, infrastructure development and finally the actual construction. Items include sea turtle approved lighting and windows, soil testing, cognizant of the nesting season in regards to work performed around the designated areas. • Eco-Tourism: Eco-Tourism is one of my favorite topics. My first major experience was a trip to Alaska that took us through the center of the state visiting Denali National Park and proceeded to several fantastic areas that allowed us to view whales, seals, and bears in their natural habitats. Although I have never worked in eco-tourism it is definitely something I fully enjoy. Providing insight to others about how our wildlife survive the environment they live in while simultaneously teaching them how to be better stewards of preservations themselves. 28.A.6 Packet Pg. 617 Attachment: 5.B. Bradley E Funk - App & Supp Questions (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) • Environmental Education: Formal academic education in environmental studies took place late high school/early college. Always willing to broaden the knowledge when provided an opportunity. 28.A.6 Packet Pg. 618 Attachment: 5.B. Bradley E Funk - App & Supp Questions (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Advisory Board Application Form Collier County Government 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 800 Naples, FL 34112 (239) 252-8400 Application was received on: 3/23/2024 1:20:55 PM. Name: Carolyn McAlear-Feingold Home Phone: 239-682-8727 Home Address: 3740 18th Ave NE City: Naples Zip Code: 34120 Phone Numbers Business: 239-377-2493 E-Mail Address: Carolynsjam@outlook.com Board or Committee: Land Acquisition Advisory Committee Category: Environmental Educator Place of Employment: Collier County Public Schools How long have you lived in Collier County: more than 15 How many months out of the year do you reside in Collier County: I am a year-round resident Have you been convicted or found guilty of a criminal offense (any level felony or first degree misdemeanor only)? No Not Indicated Do you or your employer do business with the County? No Not Indicated NOTE: All advisory board members must update their profile and notify the Board of County Commissioners in the event that their relationship changes relating to memberships of organizations that may benefit them in the outcome of advisory board recommendations or they enter into contracts with the County. Would you and/or any organizations with which you are affiliated benefit from decisions or 28.A.7 Packet Pg. 619 Attachment: 5.B. Carolyn McAlear-Feingold- Application (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) recommendations made by this advisory board? No Not Indicated Are you a registered voter in Collier County? Yes Do you currently hold an elected office? No Do you now serve, or have you ever served on a Collier County board or committee? No Not Indicated Please list your community activities and positions held: I'm a high school teacher who has run science honor societies, student government, and I currently advise our junior Class as well as run a biology club. I'm a member at Corkscrew Swamp Sanctuary and love the boardwalk there. I have never held a public office, but I serve our school on the School Advisory Council. Education: I have a BS in Biology and Secondary Education. I've spent three years in post graduate studies ranging from cell and molecular Biology to ecological Restoration. Experience / Background I was born and raised here in Naples in Golden Gate Estates, and my parents still live in the house where I grew up. I've seen this county change so much. I've been a teacher here in this county for 19 years after growing up in our public school system. I love this community and the wonders surrounding us. I'll like the opportunity to serve on this board as an educator, parent, citizen, and advocate. 28.A.7 Packet Pg. 620 Attachment: 5.B. Carolyn McAlear-Feingold- Application (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Advisory Board Application Form Collier County Government 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 800 Naples, FL 34112 (239) 252-8400 Application was received on: 3/25/2024 2:43:03 PM. Name: Christopher Satter Home Phone: 9546956338 Home Address: 3870 4th Ave Se City: Naples Zip Code: 34117 Phone Numbers Business: E-Mail Address: christopher.satter@myfwc.com Board or Committee: Land Acquisition Advisory Committee Category: Wildlife Ecologist Place of Employment: Florida Fish and Wildlife Research Institute How long have you lived in Collier County: 5-10 How many months out of the year do you reside in Collier County: I am a year-round resident Have you been convicted or found guilty of a criminal offense (any level felony or first degree misdemeanor only)? No Not Indicated Do you or your employer do business with the County? No Not Indicated NOTE: All advisory board members must update their profile and notify the Board of County Commissioners in the event that their relationship changes relating to memberships of organizations that may benefit them in the outcome of advisory board recommendations or they enter into contracts with the County. Would you and/or any organizations with which you are affiliated benefit from decisions or 28.A.8 Packet Pg. 621 Attachment: 5.B. Christopher B. Satter - App & Supp Questions (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) recommendations made by this advisory board? No Not Indicated Are you a registered voter in Collier County? Yes Do you currently hold an elected office? No Do you now serve, or have you ever served on a Collier County board or committee? No Not Indicated Please list your community activities and positions held: Research Associate - Florida Panther Project. Education: M.S., PHD.in Fisheries and Wildlife Experience / Background My expertise lies in modeling wildlife population dynamics (e.g., abundance, density, survival, and per capita recruitment), as well as spatial ecology (e.g., movement behavior, home range, and habitat selection). 28.A.8 Packet Pg. 622 Attachment: 5.B. Christopher B. Satter - App & Supp Questions (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Applicant Supplemental Information Applicant Name: _Christopher B. Satter_____ Representation of Interests: Please explain your relationship with and business interests relating to the following topics. • Environmental and Conservation: I am a wildlife ecologist currently working as a Research Associate on the Florida Panther Project for the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. • Agricultural and Business: I have no agricultural or business involvements. • Educational: I possess graduate-level education in fisheries and wildlife ecology. This background has equipped me with a deeper understanding of animal population dynamics and spatial ecology, including factors influencing population fluctuations such as survival rates, habitat selection, landscape heterogeneity, and urban development. • General Civic and Citizen: I have a strong interest in speaking to the public regarding human-wildlife coexistence and the impacts carnivores have on the ecosystems that people care about. I actively participate in giving lectures to undergraduate students at the university level and at wildlife conferences both nationally and internationally. Individual Member Expertise, Knowledge or Interest: Please elaborate on any experience, knowledge or interest you have in the following subjects. • Ecology: I have broad expertise in ecology, including the ways in which species utilize the landscape for survival, dispersal, and reproduction. Furthermore, I have a profound understanding of the top- down and bottom-up regulatory processes necessary for maintaining ecosystem balance and health. • Conservation: My current position of the Florida panther project places me on the front lines of wildlife conservation. As a scientist, my passion has equipped me to approach dealing with large carnivores on the landscape with impartiality, especially when engaging with stakeholders with differing priorities and agendas. However, carnivores paly a crucial role in maintaining ecosystems balance, and I believe it’s absolutely necessary to convey the message of conserving species because of their intrinsic value to exist, as well as their important ecological functions. 28.A.8 Packet Pg. 623 Attachment: 5.B. Christopher B. Satter - App & Supp Questions (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) • Real Estate or Land Acquisition: I have limited experience in this area. However, I am eager to broaden my knowledge and skills in land acquisition. I am a landowner and homeowner in Golden Gate Estates for the past 7 years, so I have some experience navigating property appraisal, DEP reports, and real estate in general. My current position with FWC involves flying over the landscape twice a month, providing me with an opportunity to identify areas of habitat fragmentation and assess where connectivity or acquisition would be most valuable for Florisa’s wildlife and land conservation efforts. • Land Appraisal: I have limited experience and expertise in this area. However, I have a strong interest in broadening my knowledge and skills in this area. • Land Management: I possess expertise in land management, particularly in fire management, hydrology, and native vegetation ecology. My understanding extends to identifying beneficial habitat types and landscape configurations for ecological systems. • Eco-Tourism: I don’t have a lot of experience in eco-tourism; however, I recognize its potential as a vital tool for wildlife conservation. It’s imperative, however, the eco-tourism is managed effectively to prevent any negative effects on wildlife. • Environmental Education: I am a strong advocate for environmental education. I enjoy teaching children and the public about the environment and its significance to human health and well-being. 28.A.8 Packet Pg. 624 Attachment: 5.B. Christopher B. Satter - App & Supp Questions (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Advisory Board Application Form Collier County Government 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 800 Naples, FL 34112 (239) 252-8400 Application was received on: 3/19/2024 5:50:38 PM. Name: Joan M Scharf Home Phone: 440-520-2749 Home Address: 15538 Mark Lane, 4108 City: Naples Zip Code: 34119 Phone Numbers Business: E-Mail Address: scharf_joan@yahoo.com Board or Committee: Land Acquisition Advisory Committee Category: Place of Employment: How long have you lived in Collier County: 3-4 How many months out of the year do you reside in Collier County: I am a year-round resident Have you been convicted or found guilty of a criminal offense (any level felony or first degree misdemeanor only)? No Not Indicated Do you or your employer do business with the County? No Not Indicated NOTE: All advisory board members must update their profile and notify the Board of County Commissioners in the event that their relationship changes relating to memberships of organizations that may benefit them in the outcome of advisory board recommendations or they enter into contracts with the County. Would you and/or any organizations with which you are affiliated benefit from decisions or 28.A.9 Packet Pg. 625 Attachment: 5.B. Joan Scharf - App & Supp Questions (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) recommendations made by this advisory board? No Not Indicated Are you a registered voter in Collier County? Yes Do you currently hold an elected office? No Do you now serve, or have you ever served on a Collier County board or committee? No Not Indicated Please list your community activities and positions held: volunteer at cat sanctuary Education: Ohio State University 1972 Experience / Background retired physician assistant, retired vet tech, advocate for wildlife and environment, retired volunteer at animal shelter in Ohio 28.A.9 Packet Pg. 626 Attachment: 5.B. Joan Scharf - App & Supp Questions (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Applicant Supplemental Information Applicant Name: Joan Scharf Representation of Interests: Please explain your relationship with and business interests relating to the following topics. • Environmental and Conservation: for over 35 years I have been advocating for the environment and our land, protecting wildlife from critical extinction. I have done this by emailing, petitioning, calling, and most importantly speaking out to people who I encounter while out birding and conducting tours. In the last 5 years, I have influenced many people to appreciate the wildlife, and many have become photographers who sell their work to raise money for causes, • Agricultural and Business • Educational: • General Civic and Citizen: Individual Member Expertise, Knowledge or Interest: Please elaborate on any experience, knowledge or interest you have in the following subjects. • Ecology : • Conservation: • Real Estate or Land Acquisition: • Land Appraisal: • Land Management: • Eco-Tourism: • Environmental Education: 28.A.9 Packet Pg. 627 Attachment: 5.B. Joan Scharf - App & Supp Questions (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Board of County Commissioners 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Suite 800 Naples, FL 34112 (239) 252-8400 Application for Advisory Committees/Boards Name:______________________________________________________________________________________ E-Mail Address: _____________________________________________________________________________ Home Address: _________________________________________________________Zip Code:_____________ Primary Phone:_____________________________ Secondary Phone:_____________________________ Board or Committee Applied for: ____________________________________________________________ Category (if applicable):____________________________________________________________________ Example: Commission District, Developer, environmentalist, lay person, etc. How long have you lived in Collier County: ____ How many months out of the year do you reside in Collier County: _____ Have you ever been convicted or found guilty of a criminal offense (any level felony or first degree misdemeanor only)? Yes _____ No _____ If yes, explain: ___________________________________________________________________________________________ Place of Employment:______________________________________________________________________ Do you or your employer do business with the County? Yes _____ No _____ If yes, explain:______________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________ Would you and/or any organizations with which you are affiliated benefit from decisions or recommendations made by this advisory board? Yes____No____If yes, explain: ________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________ NOTE: All advisory board members must update their profile and notify the Board of County Commissioners in the event that their relationship changes relating to memberships of organizations that may benefit them in the outcome of advisory board recommendations or they enter into contracts with the County. Are you a registered voter in Collier County: Yes _____ No _____ Do you currently hold public office? Yes _____ No _____If so, what is that office? ___________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________ Kaylyn Glenn kaylyn.glenn15@gmail.com 2700 68th St SW Naples, FL 34105 2394040819 Land Acquisition Advisory Committee 15+ years Year Round X Conservation Florida x X X X 28.A.10 Packet Pg. 628 Attachment: 5.B. Kaylyn Glenn - Application (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Do you now serve, or have you ever served, on a Collier County board or committee? Yes _____ No _____ If yes, please list the committees/boards: _____________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Please list your community activities (civic clubs, neighborhood associations, etc. and positions held: ________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________ Education:_______________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________ Experience:______________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________ Please attach any additional information you feel pertinent. This application should be forwarded to DL-AdvisoryBoardOn-LineApplications@colliercountyfl.gov, or by mail or in person to: Advisory Board Coordinator, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Suite #800, Naples, FL 34112. Thank you for your interest in serving the citizens of Collier County. X I have recently re-immersed myself in the community after pursuing my master’s degree at the University of Florida, having previously lived North Florida. During this time, I remained deeply connected to the Everglades City community, actively engaging with the various environmental. and land management issues that impact our region. As I re-engage with the community,I am eager to take on more leadership roles that align with my passion for storytelling and advocacy for our natural resources and historical culture, which are integral to this area. who served as a surveyor and played a crucial role in mapping out the existing Collier County boundary that we still utilize today. These personal connections fuel my dedication to preserving and enhancing our community’s heritage and natural landscapes. Naples High, Class of 2013 Florida Gulf Coast University, AA in Environmental Science Florida International University, B.S. Natural Resources and the Environment Pursuant: University of Florida, M.S Forest Resources and Conservation University of Oregon, Forests and Climate Graduate Certificate Growing up in Naples, Florida, I embarked on an academic journey in natural resource management that began locally before expertise in land management and regenerative expanding to universities across the country. This educational pursuit allowed me to gain agriculture, focusing on sustainable practices that promote environmental health and resilience. Throughout my professional trajectory, I have actively collaborated with landowners and the private forestry industry, gaining valuable insights into the intricacies of agricultural product markets. his hands-on experience has provided me with a deep understanding of their pivotal role in supporting the protection and sustainable management of working lands. One notable milestone in my career was my recent appointment as the land protection manager at Conservation Florida, where I spearheaded initiatives to safeguard vital ecosystems and promote biodiversity. In this role, I leveraged my expertise in land management , policy development, and stakeholder engagement to drive impactful conservation efforts.What sets me apart is not just my academic and professional background but also my proactive approach in addressing landowners' needs and challenges. I am dedicated to fostering collaborative partnerships and implementing holistic conservation practices that balance environmental preservation with economic viability and community well-being. My track record includes successful projects such as preventing forest cover loss, improving habitat quality, and championing sustainability initiatives that benefit both landowners and the environment. These experiences have reinforced my commitment to responsible land use and reinforced my understanding of the interconnectedness between natural resource management, sustainable agriculture, and land protection. I am excited about the opportunity to contribute my knowledge, skills, and passion for holistic conservation practices to the land acquisition acquisition advisory committee in Collier County. Together, we can work towards preserving and enhancing our region's natural treasures for current and future generations. Considering my background and commitment to community engagement, I am keen on contributing my skills and experiences to the Land Acquisition Committee in Collier County. I believe that my perspective as an advocate for our unique environmental and cultural legacy can greatly benefit the committee’s efforts in responsible land management and conservation. 28.A.10 Packet Pg. 629 Attachment: 5.B. Kaylyn Glenn - Application (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) 28.A.10 Packet Pg. 630 Attachment: 5.B. Kaylyn Glenn - Application (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Advisory Board Application Form Collier County Government 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 800 Naples, FL 34112 (239) 252-8400 Application was received on: 3/19/2024 4:35:46 PM. Name: Kelli DeFedericis Home Phone: 239-300-5867 Home Address: 3419 boca ciega drive City: Naples Zip Code: 34114 Phone Numbers Business: E-Mail Address: Kdefedericis@hotmail.com Board or Committee: Land Acquisition Advisory Committee Category: Certified Floodplain Manager Place of Employment: City of Marco Island How long have you lived in Collier County: more than 15 How many months out of the year do you reside in Collier County: I am a year-round resident Have you been convicted or found guilty of a criminal offense (any level felony or first degree misdemeanor only)? Yes DUI 2017 Do you or your employer do business with the County? Yes I have been the certified floodplain manager for the City if Marco Island since 2016. NOTE: All advisory board members must update their profile and notify the Board of County Commissioners in the event that their relationship changes relating to memberships of organizations that may benefit them in the outcome of advisory board recommendations or they enter into contracts with the County. Would you and/or any organizations with which you are affiliated benefit from decisions or 28.A.11 Packet Pg. 631 Attachment: 5.B. Kelli DeFedericis - App & Supp Questions (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) recommendations made by this advisory board? No Not Indicated Are you a registered voter in Collier County? Yes Do you currently hold an elected office? No Do you now serve, or have you ever served on a Collier County board or committee? No Not Indicated Please list your community activities and positions held: I am on the floodplain managers committee in Collier County I am the vice chair for the local mitigation strategy working group of collier county. Education: Experience / Background As a certified floodplain manager for Marco Island for the last 8.5 years and having worked in the environmental industry since 2006 I believe I have a lot of experience and knowledge that would help this committee. 28.A.11 Packet Pg. 632 Attachment: 5.B. Kelli DeFedericis - App & Supp Questions (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Applicant Supplemental Information Applicant Name: __ Kelli DeFedericis Representation of Interests: Please explain your relationship with and business interests relating to the following topics. • Environmental and Conservation: Open space preservation for floodplain management and natural habitat is important. • Agricultural and Business: Outreach plays a huge role in education. I prepare literature and do presentations to educate the public on the importance of floodplain management. • Educational: Through a proclamation requestion, the last three years, Governor Ron DeSantis has issued a proclamation in honor Flood Awareness week in the state of Florida. I will continue to submit this request in hopes the education will bring awareness and it because a state recognized week. General Civic and Citizen: I have lived and worked within the environmental construction field in Collier County since 2006. I have spoken to and worked with the public for the last 8.5 years on Marco Island. I understand the dynamics of the residents in Collier County. Individual Member Expertise, Knowledge, or Interest: Please elaborate on any experience, knowledge or interest you have in the following subjects. • Ecology : • Conservation: I work diligently for the protection of Marco Island’s natural function. In the recent Floodplain Ordinance update, we increased the protection of the dune system and mangrove protection to exceed the federal and state regulations for alterations. • Real Estate or Land Acquisition: I have floodplain knowledge, with regard to acquisition requirements through the federal government for flooding. • Land Appraisal: • Land Management: • Eco-Tourism: • Environmental Education: Education is key. Education is a big piece of floodplain management. I am the social medial coordinator for Florida Floodplain Managers Association. 28.A.11 Packet Pg. 633 Attachment: 5.B. Kelli DeFedericis - App & Supp Questions (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Page 1 of 6 Introduction The Capital Project Planning, Impact Fees, and Program Management Division of Transportation Management Services Department (TMSD) is submitting this written petition to the County Manager requesting an Interest in Program Lands, specifically 6.9 acres (at the lake maintenance easement boundary, 4.8 acres at control elevation and 7.2 acres at the limit of construction line) of conservation lands within the Railhead Scrub Preserve. For the purpose of this petition, the lake maintenance size of 6.9 acres will be used and referred to as the interested Program Lands. In 2004, the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) approved the acquisition of 80.33 acres in North Naples through the Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Program to form the Railhead Scrub Preserve. An additional 55.03 acres was acquired in 2007, expanding the preserve to its current acreage of 135.36. In accordance with Ordinance 2006-58 known as the Conservation Collier Exceptional Benefits Ordinance, TMSD is requesting the interested Program Lands be used as part of the Veterans Memorial Boulevard Extension Project for a stormwater drainage pond. PETITION A. State the public purpose for which the Other-use Dedication is being required. TMSD is responsible for planning transportation facilities such as roadways, pathways, and bicycle facilities to address the transportation needs of the community. This petition is requesting an Other-Use Determination of 6.9 acres of Conservation Collier Lands within the Railhead Scrub Preserve to construct a stormwater pond necessary to construct Veterans Memorial Boulevard Extension (VMB Ext.). The objective of this petition is to explain the need for the Program Lands and seek a determination that it is a Public Interest to allow the Program Lands to be acquired by and transferred to the TMSD for the pond site. A portion of the Conservation Collier parcel located in the Railhead Scrub preserve is required for a drainage pond necessary for the construction of the Veterans Memorial Boulevard extension to connect US 41 to Livingston Rd. The extension of Veteran’s Memorial Blvd. (historically referred to as Livingston Rd. E/W) has been an established need in the Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) since the 2025 LRTP, adopted in January 2001. Since the adoption of the 2025 LRTP, there have been numerous studies and planning documents all confirming the need for Veteran’s Memorial Blvd. as well as the need for sidewalks and shared use pathways along this corridor. With the completion of the Aubrey Rogers High School, the need has increased. The proposed project will improve the multimodal connection inside the County’s urbanized area, will relieve traffic congestion, and provide for the safe and efficient movement of people, goods, and services. The additional capacity will provide for a more efficient connection between many community assets including existing neighborhoods, schools, and commercial businesses. The project will also reduce road maintenance needs, reduce delays by the added capacity and improve overall traffic operations. Documentation of VMB Ext.’s public purpose is available upon request. The VMB Ext. project has established overwhelming instances of a valid public purpose. To construct the project, Collier County must build a pond site for drainage. The pond site infrastructure is as vital to the project as the roadway lanes and cannot be considered a separate or 28.A.12 Packet Pg. 634 Attachment: 5.C. Petition for Veterans Memorial Blvd 4-3-24 (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Page 2 of 6 independent effort. Therefore, all statements related to future right-of-way are intended to include all infrastructure improvements for the road, including the pond site. It is noted that this reasoning is memorialized in recent Conservation Collier Purchase Agreements which ensure Collier County Transportation can purchase a portion of the properties from Conservation Collier for future right- of-way, if and when needed, at the original per-acre acquisition cost, thereby creating an exception to the Exceptional Benefits Ordinance. B. Provide a history and discussion of alternatives to requesting the specific interest in Program Lands and demonstrate with supporting documentation as to why other alternatives are not acceptable. The VMB Ext. is a documented need and planned transportation improvement. The project appears in Collier County’s Long-Range Transportation Plan and is documented in the Capital Budget as part of the Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) as a planned improvement. The VMB Ext. Project was divided into two segments to allow the portion serving the Aubrey Rogers High School to be completed when the school opened in 2023. Phase I extended the roadway from Livingston Road to Aubrey Rogers High School and Phase II extends the roadway from Aubrey Rogers High School to Old 41 Road and US 41. Collier County hired RWA Engineering (RWA) to evaluate and perform a pond siting analysis. The Veterans Memorial Boulevard Improvements Preliminary Drainage & Alternative Pond Siting Analysis (Report) was finalized in February 2020 and is part of the documentation for this petition. The Report was used for identifying the location and pond sizes for Phase I and Phase II. The direction provided to RWA, was to consider vacant property adjacent to the road corridor when considering locations for pond siting. Adjacent parcels with established businesses (commercial) or residential homes were not considered. The Report recommended Pond Site 1 as the 1st choice and concluded that Pond Site 1 was the most logical choice based on the proximity to the drainage basin and the Pond Siting Matrix scores. Pond Site 1 is the Program Land Site. The construction of Phase I is complete and the roadway is open to the public. The excess stormwater availability from the pond site used for Phase I has been calculated and accounted for in the pond acreage needed for Phase II. An additional pond site for Phase II is required. In May 2023, Collier County acquired Pond Site 5 for the VMB Ext. Project as right-of-way and will be used for roadway and a stormwater pond site. This location was evaluated in the Report, and ranked 3rd. The excess land has been accounted for in the pond acreage need for Phase II. The existing County owned right-of-way in this corridor cannot accommodate the attenuation and water quality treatment requirements for VMB Ext. improvements, and an additional acquisition process is required for Phase II of the project. Phase II requires an additional pond site, west of the railroad, totaling approximately 6.9 acres. After coordination and site visits with Conservation Collier staff, members of the RWA consulting team developed a conceptual pond site on Pond Site 1 (Parcel ID 00152600002) to demonstrate the willingness to work together to reduce environmental impacts to wildlife species and scrub habitat located within the targeted pond site area. See attached Proposed Pond Site Exhibit. The pond site concept was refined and designed to demonstrate the continued coordination and the intent to minimize impacts to the area. The following Pond Sites were evaluated in the Report and are briefly summarized below. 28.A.12 Packet Pg. 635 Attachment: 5.C. Petition for Veterans Memorial Blvd 4-3-24 (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Page 3 of 6 Pond Site 1 is located on the south side of the proposed roadway west of the existing railroad right-of-way. The pond would be on the north side of Parcel 00152600002 owned by Collier County and dedicated preserve land of Conservation Collier. The area is known as Railhead Scrub Preserve and was acquired as a separate 60 acres of the preserve area. As stated in the Report, Pond Site 1 was determined to be the most desirable based on the proximity to the drainage basin and the matrix scores. It is noted that, this specific parcel was purchased by the County with Conservation Collier land acquisition funds in full transparency that the future VMB Ext. would be located adjacent to the acquired parcels. As noted in recent purchase agreements utilizing Conservation Collier program funds, acquisitions in a future planned county road project corridor would have an exception to the Exceptional Benefits Ordinance. Pond Site 2 is located on the north side of Parcel 00153160004 which is the south side of the proposed roadway east of the existing railroad right-of-way. It is currently owned by N A Realty Trust, Inc. This site has two existing pond systems situated within 500ft and 1500 ft of the road footprint spanning approximately 7 acres and 11 acres, respectively of the parcel footprint. This site is an existing PUD Ordinance 1982-81 for 430 multi-family dwellings and is currently going through a PUD Amendment under application PL20150001695. As stated in the Report, this site is not located within the existing natural drainage basin (and proposed project drainage basins) that have been established by the existing railroad crossing. This pond site was determined to be less desirable from an engineering and environmental perspective and was ranked 5th by the Report. Pond Site 3 is located on the west side of Old US 41 south of the future roadway alignment and is a portion of Parcel 00152240006 owned by Tri I Assoc, LLC. The only available land on this parcel is currently under a wetland conservation easement that would need to be vacated and mitigated in another location. This pond site was determined to be less desirable from an environmental perspective and ranked 4th by the Report. Pond Site 4 is located on the west side of Old US 41 north of the future roadway alignment and is a portion of Parcel 00145280002 owned by Meadow Brook Preserve, LLC. The only available land on this parcel is currently under a South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) conservation easement that would need to be vacated and mitigated in another location. The Report determined that this site was less suitable for the project and ranked this site as 2nd. In order to pursue this site, the County would need to demonstrate no other options were available, including the #1 ranked Conservation Collier property. Pond Site 5 is located directly adjacent to Tamiami Trail North (US 41). The County purchased Parcel 00154600000 in May 2023 for this project. The parcel will be used for the road and the remainder will be used for a small portion of stormwater pond. The site is too small to be the only offsite pond location but has been included in the stormwater capacity calculations. This site was ranked 3rd by the Report. The development of this project requires approximately 6.9 acres off-site ponds for drainage. The Report noted that the use of one single pond site is preferable to the use of two disconnected sites when maintenance, operation and monitoring are considered. The additional costs associated with acquisition and right-of-way permitting with two sites adds additional costs with no additional benefit. 28.A.12 Packet Pg. 636 Attachment: 5.C. Petition for Veterans Memorial Blvd 4-3-24 (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Page 4 of 6 As discussed in the Report, the other alternative locations are less desirable, and the Report recommended siting the drainage pond within the Railhead Scrub Preserve. In addition, other pond sites have been acquired to decrease the required acreage necessary from the Program Lands. C. Demonstrate with supporting documentation that the requested Other-use Dedications of portion of Program Lands takes the minimum acreage and, to the maximum extent possible, minimizes deleterious intrusion, preserves higher quality or acreage of lands than those sought if a land exchange is being offered, impact the lowest quality habitat, and avoids habitat fragmentation, noise and light pollution that would adversely affect the adjacent remaining Program Lands. Pond Site 1 was deemed to be the most favorable based on the Report evaluation and analysis. To minimize the area needed from the Conservation Collier land, the County has done an advanced acquisition of Pond Site 5. In addition, the County is expanding the pond area associated with the Phase 1 improvements for the benefit of the Phase II project improvements. Therefore, the least amount of Conservation Collier land has been used in the pond site need calculation. At the time of acquisition of the lands by Conservation Collier, it was acknowledged a roadway would traverse the parcel. The alternatives developed and documented in the Report include evaluation of alternatives and consideration of environmental impacts. Staff carefully considered the recommendations of the Report, which included limiting, to the greatest extent possible, the acreage needed for the VMB Ext. Coordination with Conservation Collier staff indicated that the methodology to follow when evaluating habitats was to give the highest priority to tortoises, then scrub habitat then wetlands. This guidance was used in evaluating and identifying the general pond site location on the Program Lands. The pond site concept was refined after coordination with Conservation Collier Staff and the preliminary design takes into consideration the minimum acreage needed and demonstrates the intent to minimize impacts to the area. D. Demonstrate with supporting documentation a substantial public need for the particular interest in the Program Lands requested, why there are no acceptable alternatives to meet the need, why the competing public use must occur at that location, and how the Other-use Dedications of portion of Program Lands will be offset to ensure an Exceptional Benefit to the Program. The adopted LRTP’s, the AUIR, studies and analysis, the existing and expected deficiencies in the transportation roadway network demonstrate a substantial public need for the VMB Ext. project. The pond site within the Program Preserve Lands is necessary for the road project and an Exceptional Benefit to the community. Alternatives to siting the pond on Conservation Collier land have been discussed above and in the Report. In addition, acquisition of the Program Lands within the preserve was completed with knowledge of a future roadway. Sidewalk access provided by the future roadway was incorporated into the long-range public access plan for Conservation Collier. The road is being built for the betterment of the community and will provide improved access to the Conservation Collier lands by allowing residents and visitors roadside access to enjoy and appreciate the natural beauty and wildlife it has to offer. This will encourage outdoor activities such as hiking, birdwatching, and nature exploration, and foster a deeper connection between individuals and the environment. 28.A.12 Packet Pg. 637 Attachment: 5.C. Petition for Veterans Memorial Blvd 4-3-24 (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Page 5 of 6 The Exceptional Benefit of public access to Conservation Collier lands is an essential element of the Conservation Collier Program and the management plan. The VMB Ext. project will provide public access to Conservation Collier lands which they currently do not have. The Railhead Scrub Preserve Land Management Plan indicates a need for improved access and notes considerable constraints with current access via private roads and a railroad crossing. The construction of Veterans Memorial Phase I and Aubrey Rogers High School near a portion of the Railhead Scrub Preserve offers a unique opportunity to educate Collier County high schoolers and the public about the rarity and imperiled nature of this rosemary scrub ecosystem. The Conservation Collier staff has documented the trespassing concern. This project and the access created by it will restrict unauthorized and detrimental access. Creating a safe, necessary, and legal managed public access for education on the southern property while creating a boundary with the road to protect the northern lands is an exceptional benefit to the program. There is currently no legal physical access to the property. The use of the Program Lands for the road and pond would create public access. The Conservation area was intended for compatible nature-based public access and passive opportunities such as for hiking trails, education programs and research. The construction of VMB Ext. and the pond provides the exceptional benefit of public access not currently available on the Program Lands but included in the goals of the program. E. Demonstrate how the Other-use Dedications of portions of Program Lands will not adversely affect any State or Federally listed species. All work within this area will be permitted and in compliance with all Federal, State and Local permitting agencies, as appropriate. Those agencies may include the US Army Corp. of Engineers, Florida Department of Environmental Protection and SFWMD. The Environmental Resource Permitting process has begun as part of this project. All laws, ordinances, regulations and required compliance activities will be adhered to during all phases of the Project. F. Demonstrate that the proposed compensation meets the goals and purposes of the Program and provides an Exceptional Benefit to the Program. Safe, managed, and legal public access is a goal of Conservation Collier that is not currently available on the Railhead Preserve. As mentioned above, improved access to the Conservation Collier lands is an exceptional benefit to the program. This project will help encourage and manage outdoor activities such as hiking, birdwatching, and nature exploration, and foster a deeper connection between individuals and the environment. To ensure the conveyance of the interest in program lands results in an exceptional benefit to the program, this petition proposes to offset the acquisition and transfer of land through a financial compensation based on a certified appraisal of the property. TMSD Staff recommends an appraisal of the Program Lands to establish reasonable value of the property and existing market conditions. Compensation into the Conservation Collier fund could allow for increased future acquisitions. The financial compensation for the acquisition has the potential to help Conservation Collier preserve, restore and manage protected land. 28.A.12 Packet Pg. 638 Attachment: 5.C. Petition for Veterans Memorial Blvd 4-3-24 (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Page 6 of 6 In addition to the financial compensation established by the appraisal, TMSD recommends contributing the following exceptional benefits to the program: x Providing a small pipe (minimum 18 inches in diameter) set at-grade. x A financial contribution of $35,000 to Conservation Collier for use at the preserve. x Coordination meetings at key project milestones. G. Include the current value of the land to be acquired as provided for in Section 4.02 [of the Ordinance]. For consideration, if the Railhead Preserve Property was acquired today, it would have been exempt from the Exceptional Benefits clause and Collier County’s TMSD would reimburse Conservation Collier for the acreage in the Program Land at the original per-acre acquisition cost. Calculated at $10,650,000 divided by 60 acres and total approximately $177,500 per acre 6.9 acres would total approximately $1,224,750. Based on the Ordinance, the value is based on the current land value. According to the Collier County Property Appraiser website record for Folio # 0015260002, the Program Land is shown to be 60 acres with a total land value of $6,000,000. When divided, the value is $100,000 per acre. The 6.9 acres would be estimated at a value of approximately $690,000. An appraisal of the property is recommended to determine the current value of the Program Land to be used for the pond site. TMSD, at their expense will have the property appraised by a certified appraiser. 28.A.12 Packet Pg. 639 Attachment: 5.C. Petition for Veterans Memorial Blvd 4-3-24 (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) 411/321E1621 OLD US 41US 41OLD US 41830 112 150 625E1 231231231231231 230230230230230 229229229229229 228228228228228226226226226226 224224224224224 223223223223223 217217217217217216216216216216 215215215215215 214214214214214 213213213213213 212212212212212 209209209209209 205205205205205 185185185185185 184184184184184 181181181181181 175175175175175 174174174174174 165165165165165 156156156156156 149149149149149 146146146146146145145145145145143143143143143 142142142142142 140140140140140139139139139139 138138138138138 137137137137137 135135135135135 134134134134134 132132132132132 131131131131131 129129129129129128128128128128127127127127127 126126126126126124124124124124123123123123123 119119119119119 118118118118118 116116116116116 111111111111111 9595959595 7777777777 624E3 624E1 411 OSW 625E4 112 150 238238238238238 237237237237237 236236236236236 235235235235235 234234234234234 233233233233233 232232232232232231231231231231 230230230230230 229229229229229 228228228228228226226226226226 224224224224224 223223223223223 221221221221221 220220220220220 219219219219219 218218218218218 7676767676 757575757574747474747373737373 72727272727171717171 7070707070 6868686868 6767676767 6666666666 6565656565 6464646464 6363636363 6262626262 606060606059595959595858585858 5656565656 5353535353 5151515151 4949494949 4848484848 4747474747 4646464646 4545454545 4343434343 4242424242 414141414139393939393838383838 3232323232 2525252525 1616161616 1313131313 12121212121111111111 88888 77777 6666655555 4444433333 22222 11111 Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. Email: tuna@thanaples.com 3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732 Marine & Environmental Consulting Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 REV#: CREATED: DRAWN BY: JOB NO.: SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE- DESIGNED: THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.S E 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED: SHEET NO.: RY NO. 5875 MN RMJ 02-27-24 19094.02 - 10 & 11 25 VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD EXT. PH II OVERALL LISTED SPECIES MAP 48 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -05 OF 13 N E S W 0 200 400 800 SCALE IN FEET US 41TORTOISE LOCATIONS -WEST PROPERTY AREA SCALE: 1" = 400' TORTOISE LOCATIONS -EAST PROPERTY AREA SCALE: 1" = 400' TORTOISE BURROWS AND CAVITY TREES SYMBOL DESCRIPTION QUANTITY POTENTIALLY OCCUPIED ONSITE 193 POTENTIALLY OCCUPIED w/in 25 FT OF SITE 12 ABANDONED 19 TOTAL BURROWS WITHIN PROJECT FOOTPRINT 224 CAVITY TREE 2 28.A.13 Packet Pg. 640 Attachment: 5.C. Exhibit - Listed Species (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) 1054+00 1055+00 1056+00 1057+00 1058+00 1059+00 1060+00 1061+001053+50 1054+50 1055+50 1056+50 1057+50 1058+50 1059+50 1060+508.887.878.597.8216.758.06 8. 5 6 8. 2 6 8.537. 7 5 8.208.007.439. 3 2 5. 5 5 8. 9 0 15.398.159.198.068. 2 5 9. 1 07.949. 4 1 8.347. 8 6 9. 1 0 8. 9 3 8.167.757.908.638.668.698. 9 8 8.758.968.968.208. 6 4 8.147. 6 5 1 7 . 4 2 8. 1 68.821 1 . 0 29.577.851 0 . 4 0 8. 7 9 8.278.479. 0 6 R2 5 ' R51' R 2 5 ' R51'27.25'20' 20'20' LME 10'10'6' 20'10'10' 6' APPROXIMATECANAL TOP OF BANK7.528.30 8.708.989.42 10.41 11.22 11.41 12.3013.3213.018.58 9.01 9.419.80 10.3010.63 10.91 11.6411.71 12.2211.3810.849.519.6010.3610.2410.039. 2 3 9. 8 2 1 0 . 2 3 9.478. 9 6 9. 8 9 9.491 0 . 0 2 1 0 . 0 9 10.128. 4 4 8.948. 9 8 8. 8 6 8.498.4411.0010.811 1 . 7 511.021 0 . 7 0 INACTIVE TORTOISE BURROWTORTOISE BURROWTORTOISE BURROWINACTIVE TORTOISE BURROWTORTOISE BURROW TORTOISE BURROWTORTOISE BURROWINACTIVE TORTOISE BURROW TORTOISE BURROW TORTOISE BURROW TORTOISE BURROW INACTIVE TORTOISE BURROW INACTIVE TORTOISE BURROW INACTIVE TORTOISE BURROW TORTOISE BURROW TORTOISE BURROW TORTOISE BURROW TORTOISE BURROW 12.810.0 13.313.513.510.5 12.8 8.58.58.5 13.513.013.0 10.5 9.013.010.59.08.513.513.08.58.58.513.58.513.010.59.08.513.513.010.520'20' LMEPROPOSED LAKE 4.81 ACRES @ CONTROL 5.82 ACRES @ TOP OF BANK APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION Feet04080TITLE:CLIENT:PROJECT:PROJECT NO.:FILE NAME:February 16, 2024 11:24 AM K:\2019\190062.00.01 Veteran's Memorial Extension - Phase 2\016 Master Drainage Infrastructure Plan\Current Plans\Design Files\M3 1900620001.dwgVETERAN'S MEMORIAL EXTENSION PHASE 2 COLLIER COUNTY 190062.00.01M3 1900620001PROPOSED POND12800 University Drive, Suite 175 Fort Myers, Florida 33907 (239) 597-0575 FAX: (239) 597-0578www.consult-rwa.comFlorida Certificates of AuthorizationEB 7663 LB695228.A.14Packet Pg. 641Attachment: 5.C. Exhibit - Pond (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Veterans Memorial Blvd. Extension Project Location Map of Phase 1 and Phase 2 28.A.15 Packet Pg. 642 Attachment: 5.C. General Location Map of Phase 1 and 2 (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - W-XW-XW-XW-XW-XW-XW-XF-XF-XF-XF-XF-XF-XF-XF-XF-XF-XF-XF-XF-X F-XF-XF-X2:1 MAX.4:1 MAX.UN-COMPACTEDNATIVE GROUND 2:1 MAX. 4:1 MAX. TOP OF BA N K LO C A T IO N & EL E V A TI O N WILL VARY D E PE N D I NG O N EX I S T I NG GROUND E L E V AT I O N . NOTES : UN-COM P A C TE DNATIVE GROUN D 2:1 MAX.4:1 MAX.UN-COMPAC T E DNATIVE GROU N D 4:1 MAX. 12.8 UN-COMPAC T E DNATIVE GROU N D R/W 9.5 12.8 13.513.010.59.02:1 MAX.4:1 MAX.UN-COMPACTEDNATIVE GROUND 13.513.012.810.02:1 MAX.4:1 MAX.UN-COMPACTEDNATIVE GROUND 13.513.010.59.0 20:1 MAX.4:1 MAX.20:1 MAX.12.82% MAX.R/W20:1 MAX.4:1 MAX.4:1 MAX.4:1 MAX.P/L±9.223BASIN 3BASIN 2PHASE 2OUTFALLLOCATIONSBASIN 1PHASE 1OUTFALLLOCATIONSPHASE 1PHASE 2BASIN 11HORIZ. SCALE (FULL):DATECHECKEDDRAWNRGE:TWP:SEC:DATE:TITLE:CLIENT:PROJECT:OFPROJECT NO.:SHEET NUMBER:REVISIONREV #HORIZ. SCALE (HALF):DESIGNED:DRAWN:VERT. SCALE (FULL):VERT. SCALE (HALF):FILE NAME:FLORIDA LICENSE NO.March 28, 2024 9:28 AM K:\2019\190062.00.01 Veteran's Memorial Extension - Phase 2\016 Master Drainage Infrastructure Plan\Exhibits\Veterans Memorial Potential Pond Sites.dwgROADWAY IMPROVEMENTSVETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD.COLLIER COUNTY11190062.00.00SEPTEMBER 20191" = 500'1" = 1000'......LASSCBN/AN/A190062.00.00 EX0265023KEISHA M. WESTBROOK, P.E.EXHIBIT 2 - AERIAL PROJECT LIMITS AND POND SITE LOCATIONS6610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200Naples, Florida 34109(239) 597-0575 FAX: (239) 597-0578www.consult-rwa.comFlorida Certificates of AuthorizationEB 7663 LB695228.A.16Packet Pg. 643Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting locations 03-28-24 (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) HORIZ. SCALE (FULL):DATECHECKEDDRAWNRGE:TWP:SEC:DATE:TITLE:CLIENT:PROJECT:OFPROJECT NO.:SHEET NUMBER:REVISIONREV #HORIZ. SCALE (HALF):DESIGNED:DRAWN:VERT. SCALE (FULL):VERT. SCALE (HALF):FILE NAME:FLORIDA LICENSE NO.ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTSVETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD.COLLIER COUNT<%2$5'2)&200,66,21(5611190062.00.00SEPTEMBER 20191" = 500'1" = 1000'.. .. ..KMWSCBN/AN/A190062.00.00 EX0265023KEISHA M. WESTBROOK, P.E.EXHIBIT 2 - AERIAL PROJECT LIMITS AND POND SITE LOCATIONS6610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200Naples, Florida 34109(239) 597-0575 FAX: (239) 597-0578www.consult-rwa.comFlorida Certificates of AuthorizationEB 7663 LB695228.A.17Packet Pg. 644Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting options (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) VETERANS MEMORIAL BOULEVARD IMPROVEMENTS PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE & ALTERNATIVE POND SITING ANALYSIS (Contract #13-6164CE, Project #60198) Prepared for: COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING DIVISION 2885 Horseshoe Drive S Naples, Florida 34104 Prepared by: 6610 Willow Park Drive Suite 200 Naples, FL 34109 November 2019 Revised January 2020 Revised February 2020 ______________________ Keisha M. Westbrook, P.E. Florida License No. 65023 dŚŝƐ ŝƚĞŵ ŚĂƐ ďĞĞŶ ĚŝŐŝƚĂůůǇ ƐŝŐŶĞĚ ĂŶĚ ƐĞĂůĞĚ͘ WƌŝŶƚĞĚĐŽƉŝĞƐŽĨƚŚŝƐĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚĂƌĞŶŽƚĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĞĚ ƐŝŐŶĞĚĂŶĚƐĞĂůĞĚĂŶĚƚŚĞƐŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞŵƵƐƚďĞǀĞƌŝĨŝĞĚ ŽŶĂŶǇĞůĞĐƚƌŽŶŝĐĐŽƉŝĞƐ͘ Digitally signed by Keisha M. Westbrook, P.E. #65023 State of Florida DN: c=US, st=Florida, l=Naples, o=RWA Inc., email=kwestbrook@co nsult-rwa.com, cn=Keisha M. Westbrook, P.E. #65023 State of Florida Date: 2020.02.26 13:58:59 -05'00' 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 645 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Page | 2 Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................4 Background...............................................................................................................................................4 Project Location........................................................................................................................................4 Existing Right-of-Way Conditions ................................................................................................................4 Preliminary Survey Data............................................................................................................................4 Land Use Description................................................................................................................................5 Habitat Assessment ..................................................................................................................................5 Seasonal High-Water Elevation (SHWE) ...................................................................................................5 100 Year Floodplain ..................................................................................................................................6 Historical and Archeological Assessment .................................................................................................6 Existing Utilities.........................................................................................................................................6 Hazardous Material Assessment...............................................................................................................6 Geology and Hydrogeology.......................................................................................................................7 Proposed Roadway Improvements .............................................................................................................7 Phased Design, Construction and Permitting Approach...........................................................................7 Phased Roadway Improvements ..............................................................................................................7 Drainage Analysis Criteria ............................................................................................................................8 Design Criteria and Regulatory Issues.......................................................................................................8 Drainage Analysis & Stormwater Management System ...........................................................................12 Existing Drainage Basins (Predevelopment)...........................................................................................12 Project Outfall Identification...................................................................................................................12 Post Development Conditions................................................................................................................13 Proposed Drainage Basins.......................................................................................................................13 Phased Approach to Stormwater Management.....................................................................................14 Design Storm Water Quality and Attenuation Volume Requirements...................................................15 Alternative Pond Siting Analysis ................................................................................................................16 Adjacent Development Residential Community Joint Use Research .....................................................16 Pond Siting Selection Criteria & Alternative Analysis.............................................................................16 General Location of Proposed Alternative Pond Sites............................................................................17 Alternative Pond Site Configurations......................................................................................................18 Existing Utility Conflicts for Alternative Pond Sites................................................................................18 Preliminary Opinion of Cost for Alternative Pond Sites..........................................................................19 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 646 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Page | 3 Right of Way Acquisition Costs...............................................................................................................19 Alternative Pond Site Recommendations...............................................................................................19 Conclusions .................................................................................................................................................20 EXHIBIT 1 Project Location Map ................................................................................................................21 EXHIBIT 2 Aerial Project Limits and Pond Site Locations .........................................................................22 EXHIBIT 3 Location Map and Pond Configurations ...................................................................................23 EXHIBIT 4 FLUCFCS Map and Soils Map .....................................................................................................24 EXHIBIT 5 Preliminary Survey Data............................................................................................................25 EXHIBIT 6 Preliminary Horizontal and Vertical Geometry Plan ................................................................26 EXHIBIT 7 Imperial Lakes RPUD Master Plan.............................................................................................27 EXHIBIT 8 Property Appraiser Data ...........................................................................................................28 EXHIBIT 9 Hydrologic Rainfall Data............................................................................................................29 EXHIBIT 10 Zoning Map Exhibit .................................................................................................................30 EXHIBIT 11 Land Use Exhibit ......................................................................................................................31 EXHIBIT 12 FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM)..............................................................................32 EXHIBIT 13 Floodplain Compensation Calculations ..................................................................................33 EXHIBIT 14 Listed Species Survey and Wetlands Assessment ..................................................................34 EXHIBIT 15 Existing Drainage Patterns and ERPs ......................................................................................35 EXHIBIT 16 Alternative Pond Site Configurations .....................................................................................36 EXHIBIT 17 Storm Water Management Calculations ................................................................................37 EXHIBIT 18 ICPR Data and Simulation Results...........................................................................................38 EXHIBIT 19 Opinion of Probable Cost of Collection System Design Alternatives ....................................39 EXHIBIT 20 Pond Siting Matrix ..................................................................................................................40 EXHIBIT 21 Phase One Jurisdictional Determination Submitted to the USACOE.....................................41 EXHIBIT 22 Preliminary Historical and Archeological Data .......................................................................42 EXHIBIT 23 Potential Outfall Locations......................................................................................................43 EXHIBIT 24 Road Drainage Schematic .......................................................................................................44 EXHIBIT 25 Preliminary Plans for Proposed High School ..........................................................................45 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 647 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Page | 4 Introduction This report presents a detention and water quality treatment pond site selection and drainage analysis for the roadway extension of Veterans Memorial Boulevardfrom Livingston Road to Old US 41. This report presents preliminary design calculations for the necessary water quality treatment and water quantity peak discharge attenuation. The report provides a description of the parameters considered and the analyses that were performed as required to provide a recommendation for the location of thealternative pond site and associated facilities. Background The Collier County long range transportation element of the Growth Management Plan indicates that Veterans Memorial Boulevard will require improvementsand the Capital Improvement Element show the project being funded for construction between Fiscal Years 2019-2023. The Collier County School Board has presented a proposal for the construction of a new school facility located on Veterans Memorial Boulevard west of Livingston Road. The proposed facility will require an extension of the existing roadway to allow access to the school. The school is on an accelerated design, permitting and construction schedule. As such, the construction of theroadwayproject will be completed in two phasesto accommodate their needs. These phases are described in more detail later in this report. See Exhibit 25 – Preliminary Plans for Proposed High School. Project Location The overall project limits and the pond sites considered in this analysis are shown on Exhibit 1 – Project Location Map and Exhibit 2 – Aerial Project Limits and Pond Site Locations. The general project location extends from Livingston Road to Old US 41, in the existing Veterans Memorial Boulevard Right-of-Way. There are alternative pond sites proposed west of Old US 41 which will be discussed in further detail below. Existing Right-of-Way Conditions Preliminary Survey Data As a part of the effort to identify drainage conditions and additional Right-of-Way required along the subject corridor, survey tasks were performed. These items include a base map, a control survey, a preliminary topographic survey and a 60% Right-of-Way map. The preliminary topographic survey provided spot elevations at intervals of 1,000 feet in non-obscured areas and at critical locations along the corridor. The survey maps are attached and can be found in Exhibit 5 – Preliminary Survey Data. The existing conditions for the proposed roadway consist of roughly 75% undeveloped land, with 25% being previously constructed roadway improvements within the Veterans Memorial Boulevard Right-of- Way. The previously constructed roadway geometry consists of a two-lane roadway to allow access to the existing elementary school and surrounding residential communities. As a result of the Right-of-Way mapping effort, there appears to be a small notch in the Right of Way, yet to be acquired. It falls at station 67+85 and is approximately 30 feet by 50 feet. County staff is currently researching the issue and may have to obtain title work to supplement the findings. 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 648 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Page | 5 During the initial planning and proposal stage of this project, it was anticipated that all the alternative pond sites would be directly adjacent to the limits of the existing Collier County Right-of-Way east of Old US 41. After further analysis, it was determined that capturing the stormwater for roadway improvements in DB1 was not feasible within project limits, thereforeadditional areas were identifiedwest of Old US 41. Additional topographic information will be obtained for the portion of the project west of Old US 41 as a part of a separate contract with Collier County Transportation Planning as this was not anticipated as part of the scope of the work for this effort. Land Use Description The zoning designations surrounding the project limits consist of Planned Unit Developments with predominantly single family, multi-family and manufactured housing residential land uses. There are two school sites on Agriculturally zoned properties on the eastern portion of the proposed roadway. On the western portion of the right of way there is an industrial PUD on the north side of the Right-of-Way as well. The area also contains shopping centers and commercial developments. A portion of the adjacent land remains in an undeveloped state and includes wetland and upland areas. The zoning designations are shown in Exhibit 10 – Zoning Map Exhibit and the current land uses are shown in Exhibit 11 – Land Use Exhibit. Habitat Assessment The project team included Turrell, Hall & Associates (THA) who was responsible for environmental assessment including Habitat, Species and Wetland Assessments. The results of the initial habitat assessment are presented in Exhibit 4 - FLUCFCS Map and Soils Map. The preliminary assessment of habitat shows the FLUCFCS designations for the entire right of way and soil types based on 1998 United State Department of Agriculture Soil Survey of Collier County Area, FL (SCS). Additional assessments will need to be performed west of Old US 41 under separate contract as this was not anticipated to be a part of the scope of this effort. A listed Species Survey and Wetland Assessment effort is currently being completed by THA, this data will be provided in Exhibit 14 – Listed Species Survey and Wetlands Assessment. This will discuss any possible listed species that are present in the area and wetlands that will need to be mitigated. This document also presents seasonal high-water information for each of the basin areas. Please refer to these documents for all information associated with environmental conditions, species and water table estimates. Seasonal High-Water Elevation (SHWE) THA also analyzed the SHWE for the corridor. The results of their analysis are presented in Exhibit 14 – Listed Species Survey and Wetlands Assessment. Based on Turrell, Hall & Associates’ findings, an elevation of 10.5’ NAVD has been determined as the seasonal high water table for use in the design for Drainage Basin 2 (DB 2) which is the basin east of the existing railroad crossing and 9.0’ NAVD for Drainage Basin 1 which is west of the existing railroad crossing. Note that the SHWE for DB 1 will need to be adjusted to 8.3’ NAVD to match the existing permitted elevation on that site if Alternative Pond Site 5 is chosen. Additional assessments will need to be performed west of Old US 41 under separate contract as this was not anticipated to be a part of the scope of this effort. 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 649 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Page | 6 100 Year Floodplain The pond sites and the Right-of-Way areas were analyzed with respect to project encroachment into areas designated as floodplains. Exhibit 12 - Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM)indicates the flood zone designations for the subject area. The roadway expansion is primarily within an AH flood zone with base flood elevations (BFEs) ranging from 12.5’ NAVD on the east end to 10.5’ on the west end and portions are within an X flood zone as indicated on the maps. All alternative pond sites are within an AH flood zone designation with BFEs between 10.5’ and 10’ NAVD. The flood zones and Base Flood Elevations (BFEs) designated by FEMA for the project are based on the elevation to which a flood is anticipated to rise during the base (100-year) flood event. Floodplain compensation for these types of events is considered a regulatory requirement. In this case, floodplain compensation calculations have been performed for the roadway and resulted in the roadway being an exporter, as shown in Exhibit 13 -Floodplain Compensation Calculations. Since the roadway is considered an exporter, no floodplain compensation action will need to be taken. Historical and Archeological Assessment A letter was requested from the Florida Master Site File and it shows there may be unrecorded archaeological sites, historical structures or other resources within the project limits. It appears that during the previous development of the Imperial Lakes property, the developer was going to request a resource survey waiver from the state, started the paperwork, but it seems that they did not follow through as the project went on hold. This effort will need to be completed prior to additional permitting. Please see Exhibit 22 – Preliminary Historical and Archeological Data. Existing Utilities There are limited existing utilities within the Veteran's Right-of-Way such as water, sewer, electric, cable, and telephone. On the west end of the project near the intersection of Old US 41, there are two transmission lines. One FPL overhead power transmission line is on the north side and the other on the south side of the existing Right-of-Way. There is also an FPL overhead power distribution line running along the southern limits of the right of way in the same area. These overhead power lines are installed within the existing Right-of-Way and severely limit the options of any open linear detention between the railroad and Old US 41. On the eastern limits of the project adjacent to the elementary school and Secoya Reserve there is an existing overhead power distribution line along the southern Right-of-Way line. These utilities do not conflict with the proposed improvements along that section of the roadway. These existing utility locations can be found in Exhibit 5 – Preliminary Survey Data. Hazardous Material Assessment No hazardous material assessment was performed as a part of the efforts for this section of roadway between Livingston Road and Old US 41. Based on the additional assessment required for the alternative pond locations on the west side of Old US 41 under separate County contract, this is something that should be included in the final design efforts if it has not already been done. 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 650 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Page | 7 Geology and Hydrogeology No analysis of geology and hydrogeology was performed as a part of the efforts for this section of roadway between Livingston Road and Old US 41. Based on the additional assessment required for the alternative pond locations on the west side of Old US 41 under separate County contract, this is something that should be included in the final design efforts if it has not already been done. Proposed Roadway Improvements Phased Design, Construction and Permitting Approach It is anticipated that this project will be permitted in two phases through the SFWMD and the USACOE. The reason for phasing the project stems from coordination with CCPS regarding their accelerated schedule. The school is scheduled to open in the Fall of 2023. In order to give the school a construction access by the third quarter of 2021, an approach was derived to accommodate the roadway extension up to the eastern school entrance by taking a two phased approach with USACOE and SFWMD. During preliminary analysis of the wetlands, it appeared that there were only non-jurisdictional wetlands east of the drive as it related to the USACOE standards. That is when it was decided to go into the USACOE with a request for a “no permit required letter” for the first phase and an individual permit for the second phase. If this approach proves out, the Phase 1 portion of the road would be permitted in September 2020 and constructed within 9 months of that date giving the school a construction access by their construction start date. See permitting above and phasing discussion below for further information on this approach. Phased Roadway Improvements 1. Phase One Roadway Improvements This phase includes the design and permitting of approximately 7,000 L.F. of four-lane divided roadway. This roadway extension will allow for a construction access to the eastern entrance of the proposed high school parcel. This is to allow for the construction of the school campus to be underway during the Army Corps of Engineers permitting process required for wetlands that lie east of Phase One. The proposed roadway improvements will include intersection and signalization improvements at Livingston Road. At the western limit of phase one there will be two westbound left turn lanes constructed at the eastern entrance to the proposed high school. These turn lanes have been coordinated with CCPS. Also, dual westbound left turn lanes, a single westbound left turn lane and two eastbound right turns lane will be constructed at the entrances to the existing elementary school which will need further coordination with CCPS to ensure that they meet their capacity requirements. In addition to the schools, an eastbound right turn lane will be constructed at the entrance to Secoya Reserve. The need for a westbound left turn lane will be evaluated during construction plan preparation. The existing two-lane access road curves north as it extends to the west past the Secoya Reserve residential community. This existing curve in the roadway will need to be corrected in the 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 651 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Page | 8 proposed construction plan documents to allow for proper horizontal alignment of the new roadway section from the west termination point to a point just east of the entrance to Secoya Reserve as well as drainage improvements to the existing flume and ditch system if desired. The proposed roadway preliminary horizontal and vertical alignments are shown in Exhibit 6 – Preliminary Horizontal and Vertical Geometry Plans. 2. Phase Two Roadway Improvements This phase will be implemented once the Army Corps of Engineers permit is received. Phase two includes the design and permitting of approximately 5,200 L.F. of four-lane roadway to Old US 41 as shown in Exhibit 6 – Preliminary Horizontal and Vertical Geometry Plans. This roadway extension will cross an existing railroad which will need to be coordinated with Seminole Gulf Railroad prior to design. The proposed roadway improvements will include intersection and signalization improvements at Old US41 and a signalized intersection at the eastern-most entrance of the proposed high school. There will also be a single eastbound right turn lane to the eastern entrance. A single westbound left turn lane and eastbound right turn lane will be constructed at the western entrance of the proposed high school. All water quality and attenuation of drainage from the turn lanes from the school will be accommodated in the school’s water management system. All other future turn lanes for undeveloped parcels will be constructed by the property owners during development of the parcels and will require compensating right of way. This turn lane construction will likely require some revision to the dry detention within the Right-of-Way by the developer unless something is worked out prior to construction of the proposed roadway improvements. The proposed roadway preliminary horizontal and vertical alignments are shown in Exhibit 6 – Preliminary Horizontal and Vertical Geometry Plans. Drainage Analysis Criteria Design Criteria and Regulatory Issues 1. Design Guidelines The South Florida Water Management District “Environmental Resource Permit Information Manual 2014” is the document used to obtain the design criteria for the surface water management system. In addition, the Florida Department of Transportation “2019 Drainage Manual”is being used for design criteria. The bullets below outline the different parameters used to prepare the preliminary design and analyze the alternative pond sites for this project. x Pipe Material: reinforced concrete pipe. x Design storm frequency: 25-year 3-day storm. x Design tail water: Based on surrounding SFWMD ERP permits, surveyed elevations of high water lines/marks, and local tidal information. x Hydrologic analysis: Unit Hydrograph Method and South Florida Water Management District Rainfall Graphs 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 652 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Page | 9 x Pond Side Slopes: Side slopes will be no greater than 4:1. x Control Elevation: Based on surrounding SFWMD ERP permits (DB 1) and site specific Seasonal High Water information provided by Turrell, Hall & Associates (DB 2). x Time of Concentration: 10 minutes minimum x Excluding minor losses, the storm sewer system shall provide a minimum clearance of 1 foot from the Hydraulic Grade Line (HGL) to the gutter elevation. This will not apply to ditch bottom inlets where temporary ponding is not objectionable. If all minor losses are considered, then it is acceptable that the HGL reached the gutter elevation. x The minimum velocity shall be 2.5 feet per second (fps) in the storm sewer pipes x Outlet Velocity: if it exceeds 6 fps then erosion protection and/or energy dissipation shall be considered x Manning’s coefficients: 0.012 for concrete pipe x The minimum pipe diameter shall be 18 inches x Maximum distance between pipe access shall be 300 feet for pipe diameters of 18 inches, 400 feet for pipe diameters of 24 to 36 inches and 500 feet for pipe diameters of 42 inches or larger. x Using an intensity of 4 inches per hour, the calculated spread at each curb inlet shall be less than one half of the width of the outside travel lane x Minimum vertical clearance from other utilities shall be a minimum 1 foot unless otherwise specified by the utility standards 2. Seasonal High-Water (SHWT) Determination The Seasonal High-Water Elevation is one of the parameters necessary in order to accurately set control elevations for the project. The control elevation is defined as the lowest elevation that water can leave the system. The control elevation is also set to conserve the health of wetlands in the area of the project and to protect the freshwater resource. The Seasonal High-Water Elevation is one of the factors used in setting the control elevation and more importantly in protecting the roadway base from saturation. As discussed above, THA analyzed the SHWE for the corridor. The results of their analysis are presented in Exhibit 14 – Listed Species Survey and Wetlands Assessment. Based on their findings, an elevation of 10.5’ NAVD has been determined as the seasonal high water table for use in the design for Drainage Basin 2 (DB 2) which is the basin east of the existing railroad crossing and 9.0’ NAVD for Drainage Basin 1 which is west of the existing railroad crossing. Note that the SHWE for DB 1 will need to be adjusted based upon the pond site that is chosen as a result of this report. It is the opinion of RWA, Inc. that the best location for additional storage would be on the land east of the railroad right of way that is owned by Conservation Collier (Pond Site 1). If this does not prove to be a feasible option, then the SHWE would have to be adjusted to match the control elevation of the existing system for the site that is ultimately selected. Additional assessments will need to be performed west of Old US 41 under separate contract as this was not anticipated to be a part of the scope of this effort. 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 653 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Page | 10 3. Hydrologic Data The hydrologic rainfall data used for the preliminary design of the pond is presented in Exhibit 9 – Hydrologic Rainfall Data. 4. Regulatory Issues The following are a list of the regulatory agencies that will be involved with the permitting and construction of the roadway. Additional assessments will need to be completed for the alternative pond sites west of Old US 41 prior to Phase Two permitting. That area was not considered to be a part of this study and will be performed under separate contract prior to submitting the Phase Two permits. x United States Army Corp of Engineers (USACOE) The USACOE regulates dredge and fill activities in federal wetlands. However, the USACOE doesnot regulate surface or groundwater. After assessing the wetlands within the project boundary and adjacent areas, it was determined that a two-phase approach to environmental permitting would be the best path forward. This phased approach will be discussed further in the report below. THA has preliminarily stated that it is likely that Phase One of the project will not impact federally regulated wetlands. A request for a Jurisdictional Determination was submitted to the local USACOE office by THA on October 15, 2019 for the first phase of the permit process. The application can be found in Exhibit 21 –Phase One Jurisdictional Determination Submitted to the USACOE. If this “no permit required” letter is obtained, the two-phase approach will be implemented. In the phased approach described, Phase Two construction will require an Individual Permit (IP) be obtained for federally regulated wetland impacts for significant projects with complex issues. Further discussion about project phasing can be found later in this report. x South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) SFWMD regulates surface and groundwater resources in the project area. In addition, the SFWMD reviews projects for environmental impacts that include wetland and wildlife impacts. Review includes primary, secondary and cumulative impacts. The project will require permitting through South Florida Water Management District to address impacts to surface and groundwater resources as well as impacts to wetlands and wildlife. This site will require an Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) from SFWMD. The pre- application meeting with SFWMD was held early in the development process, but the exact methodology was not determined at that time. An additional permit submittal 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 654 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Page | 11 coordination meeting with South Florida Water Management District will be conducted once the final pond site has been selected and design documents are further along in the permitting process. At this time the meeting is expected to take place in early December. Further discussion with SFWMD permitting staff has led to the two-phase approach discussed above in the USACE section. Since all wetlands that are within the limits of phase one are isolated and not connected to navigable waterways, they will not be deemed jurisdictional by the USACE, but they will be state regulated by SFWMD and require minimal mitigation. SFWMD staff has determined that the elementary school Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) is expired and cannot be modified. The decision was madeto remove the existing flows from theschool’s system and have a single permit for the entire section of roadway. Therefore, the first phase would be reviewed as a new individual permit and would include the existing improvements completed by the elementary school and Secoya Reserve at the eastern limit of the project within the existing Collier County Right-of-Way. It is assumed that the remainder of Phase Two improvements would be shown as future development area so that the ERP could simply be modified to add the improvements within Phase Two. This will be verified with SFWMD during the permit submittal coordination meeting discussed above. Phase Two of the SFWMD permitting would include the western portion of the project described in more detail below. This would be completed in conjunction with the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE) Individual Permit for the remaining jurisdictional impacts to federal wetlands as described above. This two-phase approach to the ERP applications has been developed based on the timing of the school construction and is predicated on the premise that the USACOE will issue a “No Permit Required” letter for the limits of Phase One. x Species Assessment and Permitting Agencies Both phases of the project will include some level of involvement related to listed species from both the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission(FWC) on the state level and the US Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) at the federal level. Further discussion will be presented in Exhibit 14 – Listed Species Survey and Wetlands Assessment when it is completed by THA. x Seminole Gulf Railroad A license agreement to construct improvements within and across the Seminole Gulf Railroad will be needed for the roadway as well as any pipe crossings that are anticipated as part of the stormwater management system, although no stormwater crossings are anticipated as the project is currently proposed. County staff is currently coordinating with the Railroad Company representatives to obtain permission to construct the at grade and public utilities within the 180’ railroad Right-of-Way. x Other Permitting Agencies (items not a primary focus of this report and to be undertaken during the design phase of the roadway project) 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 655 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Page | 12 Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) for hazardous materials disposal (if required), water main extension, wastewater collection/distribution components and stormwater discharge from construction activities. SFWMD for construction dewatering activities. SFWMD for irrigation source permitting. 5. Existing Environmental Resource Permits The project area is adjacent to or within the drainage areas of several existing ERPs previously issued by the SFWMD. Please see Exhibit 15 - Existing Drainage Patterns and ERPs for locations and additional information on the existing permits. If the roadway improvements impact any of these existing permits that are still active, a modification will be required prior to construction. These may include modifications to the Mediterra permit to reroute discharge, a modification to the Imperial Golf Estates permit for use of a ditch that is part of the stormwater management system and also to the permits that are west of the Old US 41 right of way as discussed in the Pond Siting section later on this report. Drainage Analysis & Stormwater Management System Existing Drainage Basins (Predevelopment) This section describes the existing drainage patterns and drainage system for the Right-of-Way and the pond sites. Existing drainage patterns are shown in Exhibit 15 – Existing Drainage Patterns and ERPs. Two outfalls from the Mediterra residential community to the north currently discharge through the site in open drainage swales to the south and east. Everything east of the western Mediterra discharge point currently flows east to the ditch that is located between the elementary school and Imperial Golf Estates. Existing flows from between the Seminole Railroad Right-of-Way and the western Mediterra discharge point currently flow to the southwest to an existing swale along the eastern edge of the railroad and to a discharge structure to the south of Imperial Lakes and connects to the Imperial Golf Estates drainage system. Existing flows west of the Seminole Railroad Right-of-Way flow west into a low area in the County owned Right-of-Way and eventually make their way across Old US 41 into the ditch on the west side. This ditch flows south and west to an eventual outfall on the west side of US 41. Project Outfall Identification As a part of the preliminary efforts for this drainage analysis and pond siting report, potential project outfalls were identified along the project corridor. These outfall locations were presented to County staff at a coordination meeting and can be found in Exhibit 23 - Potential Outfall Locations. After further analysis of existing drainage patterns and information obtained from County staff on capacity availability in existing drainage ways, outfalls 2, 3 and 4 were ruled out. Outfall 2 would require cooperation from Collier County Public Schools (CCPS) to discharge through their site which ultimately dischargessouth into Imperial Golf Estates.Outfall 3 would require cooperation from the developer currently working on a plan 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 656 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Page | 13 for Imperial Lakes and would discharge to a portion of Imperial Golf Estates that has had historic capacity issues. Outfall 4 is a historic ditch in an FPL easement that is enclosed for a short stretch on private property. This outfall has no capacity for additional runoff of any kind. Therefore, it was determined that Outfalls 1 and 5 had the most existing capacity and/or could be upgraded if needed to accommodate additional capacity. It should be noted that the existing drainage basin line that is located at the western discharge point from Mediterra shown in Exhibit 15 - Existing Drainage Patterns and ERPs. Everything east of that line flows to the southeast to Outfall 1. Everything west of that line flows to the southwest overland to outfalls 2, 3 and 4. The proposed drainage scheme would alter that basin line to take additional water to the east to Outfall 1 from just east of the Seminole Railroad Right-of-Way. Approximately 9 acres of additional land area will be flowing to Outfall 1 in the proposed scenario. Although this additional area will not significantly impact the system during the design storm event, it is the opinion of RWA that further assessment of this regional drainage basin should be performed by Collier County to assess the current condition of the drainage structures and flow ways and determine the need for maintenance and/or improvements. There will need to be box culverts installed under the roadway between the two conservation Collier sites to maintain the flow-way for flows travelling north to south along the undeveloped properties. These should be installed on the east side of the Railroad Right-of-Way prior to the Imperial Lakes property. Post Development Conditions The roadway improvements will include primary stormwater management facilities to provide for water quality treatment and water quantity attenuation. The land uses and associated pervious and impervious area quantities, limited to the Right-of-Way and quantified with respect to pavement and pervious areas is presented in Exhibit 17 –Storm Water Management Calculations and Exhibit 18 –ICPR Input Data and Simulation Results. The roadway drainage will be routed by a series of curb inlets and roadside detention areas. The general intent is to direct the runoff from the proposed impervious area to the stormwater management facilities. Proposed Drainage Basins There are two separate drainage basins for this project. The extent and ultimate receiving water body for each of the drainage basins is described below: 1. Drainage Basin 1 (DB 1) This is the basin west of the railroad, the drainage will be conveyed via a series of pipes to an offsite wet pond. With existing utilities and a limited right-of-way width, a roadside detention area for this basin is not plausible. The primary water management system and associated secondary collection system is the Cocohatchee River as the existing ditch along Imperial Lakes residential development ultimately discharges there. The proposed drainage scheme would alter the existing drainage basin line to take additional water to the east to Outfall 1 from just east of the Seminole Railroad Right-of-Way. Approximately 9 acres of additional land area will be flowing to Outfall 1 in the proposed scenario. Therefore, this outfall ditch will need to be maintained and the outfall may need to be adjusted for the 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 657 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Page | 14 additional drainage. An additional study of the ditch and discharge facility is being conducted under separate contract with Collier County Stormwater. 2. Drainage Basin 2 (DB 2) This is the basin east of the railroad, each roadside swale will be interconnected to one centrally located wet pond north of the proposed school and roadway. DB 2 can accommodate all water quality and storage requirements within the confines of the existing County owned Right-of-Way. The primary water management system and associated secondary collection system is the Cocohatchee River as the existing ditch along the west side of Old US 41 ultimately discharges there. Although they were unable to provide documentation and/or existing models, the capacity of the receiving water body has been verbally verified by Collier County Stormwater staff and has no downstream constrictions. Phased Approach to Stormwater Management 1. Phase One Drainage The Phase One improvements fall entirely within Drainage Basin 2 (DB 2). The stormwater management for the roadway extension in Phase One will include a detention swale along the north side of the roadway. This swale will be connected directly to a wet detention pond located northof the proposed high schooland roadway. This will discharge to the south along the eastern limit of the Imperial Golf Estates property through a ditch which discharges into the Imperial Drainage Outlet Basin and then eventually into the Cocohatchee River. Two outfalls from the Mediterra residential community to the north currently discharge through the Right-of-Way through open swale systems. These outfalls will need to be re-routed and piped beneath the proposed roadway to their existing outfall locations. These flows will not be routed through the proposed lakes for the roadway, they will bypass the system. The construction of the bypass will be permitted during Phase One construction. The controlled discharge from the Lake in DB 1 will combine with the bypass pipe from the western Mediterra outfall and continue south to the ditch along the north side of Imperial Golf Estate property and flow to the east and then to the South to the discharge weir on the south end of the eastern ditch. The eastern Mediterra Outfall will bypass the system through a pipe to the south and into the eastern ditch and flow to the south to the same discharge weir on the south end of the ditch. See Exhibit 24 – Proposed Drainage Schematic for a map of the proposed basin and flow directions. 2. Phase Two Drainage The Phase Two roadway improvements have components that are within both drainage basins. The railroad will serve as the boundary between DB 1 and DB 2. The stormwater management system for the roadway extension east of the railroad (DB 2) will flow to a detention swale along the south side of the roadway. This swale will be connected directly to an expanded wet detention pond located north of the proposed high school and will discharge as discussed in Phase One. The stormwater management west of railroad (DB 1) will include interconnected pipes to the west. As the two alternative pond sites on the east side of Old US 41 are not viable options as 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 658 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Page | 15 discussed later in this report, the discharge will need to be extended to the west under Old US 41, cross the existing canal west of the roadway to one of the three alternative pond sites (3, 4 and 5).The construction of this connection will need to be analyzed once topographic data is obtained for the portion west of Old US 41. This system will discharge to the east into the existing roadside canal and flow south to eventually discharge into the Cocohatchee River. See Exhibit 24 – Proposed Drainage Schematic for a map of the proposed basin and flow directions. Design Storm Water Quality and Attenuation Volume Requirements The design storm, water quality requirements, attenuation volumes and the details of the computer modeling and analysis are presented in Exhibit 17 – Storm Water Management Calculations and Exhibit 18 – ICPR Input Data and Simulation Results. Presented below is the summary of the water quality treatment and water quantity attenuation calculations for the project. This project is split into two construction phases and two drainage basins. Therefore, the information will be presented as such. The required water quality treatment volume for wet detention is the greater of 1 inch over the entire Right-of-Way or 2.5 inches times the percent impervious area for the project limits calculated in accordance with SFWMD criteria. This project is a continuation of an existing roadway and includes the expansion and alteration of existing pavement areas. As the current SFWMD permit is expired for the existing two-lane roadway, the existing pavement surfaces will be included in water quality treatment and attenuation calculations for the current phased approach in Phase One construction within DB 2. Stormwater treatment facilities that are already providing treatment and peak discharge attenuation will be replaced with equivalent volume treatment in the Phase One permit application within DB 2. In the existing condition, runoff from areas between Livingston and Old US 41 naturally flow to the southwest. Newly constructed pavement areas increase the amount of impervious area that will receive water quality treatment in accordance with current criteria. Dilution of the existing water quality treatment should not occur, so as a result any pavement surface added will receive 2.5 inches times the percent impervious area of treatment as the base treatment. Although some of the project does not directly discharge into the Cocohatchee River, both drainage basins include increasing the base water quality treatment by 50% for a total of 150% treatment due to the proximity of these sensitive waters. The required and provided water quality volume requirements for the two drainage basins are presented in Exhibit 17 – Storm Water Management Calculations. The water quantity criteria are dictated by basin discharge limitations. The project is located within the general Collier County Basin which specifies 0.12 cubic feet per second (CFS) per acre discharge amount for the 25 year/3-day storm event. A summary of site and roadway parameters related to design stormelevations can be found in Exhibit 17 –Storm Water Management Calculations and Exhibit 18 – ICPR Input Data and Simulation Results. ICPR 4.0 software was used to simulate the design storms and design the stormwater management system to meet the water quantity criteria. Input dataand parameters used in the model are presented in Exhibit 18 – ICPR Input Data and Simulation Results. 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 659 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Page | 16 Alternative Pond Siting Analysis Adjacent Development Residential Community Joint Use Research Research was completed to assess the ability to connect to existing community systems adjacent to the existing Veterans Memorial Boulevard Right-of-Way. The first step in this process was to research all existing ERPs through SFWMD to see if there was available storage within any of the existing adjacent stormwater management systems (SWMS). See Exhibit 15 – Existing Drainage Patterns and ERPs for adjacent SWMS that were found. 1. It was found that Mediterra is not a viable option for detention since there is no available volume in the constructed system. Sending the drainage to their system would require a significant revision to the system as it is currently designed. 2. Imperial Golf Estates has had long standing flooding problems since the control elevation is approximately 3-5 feet lower than any of the adjacent systems. This system was ruled out for any treatment or attenuation due to that issue. The controlled discharge for DB 1 of the roadway will be passing through their system as it was required that they convey offsite flows. 3. Imperial Lakes was ruled out after a meeting with the developer to discuss opportunities for treatment and attenuation ontheir site. After that coordination meeting, County Staff statedthat the developer had been unresponsive regardingthese opportunities.There is still a possibility that this would be a viable option for the Phase II portion of the project. This would not be ideal for storage for DB1 as it would require crossing the railroad to convey stormwater. 4. County staff had multiple discussions with Conservation Collier who owns and maintains the properties north and south of the Right-of-Way corridor between Mediterra and the Railroad, between Imperial Lakes and the Railroad and between Landmark Estates and the Railroad. They stated that they would not allow construction of a water quality and attenuation lake on property that they own for a roadway project. 5. After all properties directly adjacent to the Right-of-Way between Livingston Road and Old US 41 were ruled out, we began looking for opportunities for storage on the west side of Old US 41 east of US 41. There were multiple Right-of-Way reservations for a future roadway extension in that area, but none were ever acquired. We looked at areas outside of any future roadway extension that could be used for storage and expanded for future needs. Further analysis of the Pond sites can be found below. Pond Siting Selection Criteria & Alternative Analysis In addition to the detention and retention areas proposed within the Veteran’s Memorial Boulevard Rights-of Way currently owned by the County, four alternative pond sites were selected. A general location of the selected sites is presented below and shown in Exhibit 2 – Aerial Project Limits and Pond Site Locations and further detailed in Exhibit 3 – Location Map and Pond Configurations. 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 660 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Page | 17 The pond site selection criteria were based on conservation of environmental resources and conservation of financial resources. The pond siting matrix and alternative analysis is presented as Exhibit 20 - Pond Siting Matrix. This exhibit defines all the parameters used in evaluating the alternative pond sites being considered. In coordination with adjacent property owners, pond sites 1 and 2 were ruled out as viable alternatives as discussed above. Therefore, no costs were considered for these alternative pond sites. If desired, a pond siting matrix can be provided for these two sites if the County wishes to further pursue these options. General Location of Proposed Alternative Pond Sites The existing County owned right of way cannot accommodate the attenuation and water quality treatment requirements for the improvements proposed from Livingston Road to the west to Old US 41. There will be Right-of-Way acquisition needs of private property for additional pond sitesrequired for the roadway expansion. Each of these sites are outlined below: 1. Pond Site 1 Site 1 is located on the south side of the proposed roadway west of the existing railroad Right-of- Way on the north side of Parcel 00152600002 owned by Collier County and dedicated land of Conservation Collier. At this time, Conservation Collier has stated that it will not relinquish property to accommodate drainage requirements for a roadway project. 2. Pond Site 2 Site 2 is located on the south side of the proposed roadway east of the existing railroad Right-of- Way on the north side of Parcel 0053160004 currently owned by N A Realty Trust, Inc. This site is an existing PUD Ordinance 82-81 for 430 multi-family dwellings and is currently going through a PUD amendment under application PL20150001695. Please see Exhibit 7 – Imperial Lakes RPUD Master Plan for the uses in the area proposed for Pond Site 2. As this site is already through entitlement, obtaining property on this site would be difficult as the current owner would likely ask for payment for any lost revenue if units are lost as a result. 3. Pond Site 3 Site 3 is located outside of the study limits on the west side of Old US 41 south of the future roadway alignment and is a portion of Parcel 00152240006 owned by Tri I Assoc, LLC. The only available land on this parcel is currently under a wetland conservation easement that would need to be vacated and mitigated in another location. 4. Pond Site 4 Site 4 is located outside of the study limits on the west side of Old US 41 north of the future roadway alignment and is a portion of Parcel 00145280002 owned by Meadow Brook Preserve, LLC. The only available land on this parcel is currently under a preservation easement that would need to be vacated and mitigated in another location. 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 661 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Page | 18 5. Pond Site 5 Site 5 is located outside of the study limits directly adjacent to Tamiami Trail, N (US 41) which would require the complete purchase of Parcel 00154600000 owned by A L Dougherty Co., Inc. This parcel would likely be too small to be the only offsite pond location, but we did not want to rule it out as an option as the site is currently undeveloped but is zoned commercial. See Exhibit 8 – Property Appraiser Data for additional details on each of the parcels described above. Alternative Pond Site Configurations Two separate alternative pond site configurations were considered. The template sites are shown as square and reflect the minimum size necessary to achieve the expected water quality treatment and water quantity attenuation requirements. The two pond site alternatives are presented in Exhibit 16 - Alternative Pond Sites, Template Ponds. The differencebetween these two alternatives is the cross section proposed. The first pond site is a typical cross section with characteristics in accordance with the Collier County Excavation Ordinance. The template design includes littoral shelf plantings in general accordance with Collier County standards and in accordance with similar detention facilities recently constructed by FDOT. The second alternative includes a cross section that creates a baffle in the pond site which allows for a sedimentation trap and additional best management practices for water quality treatment. A pond was recently designed and constructed with this additional water quality treatment best management practice on US 41 near the intersection of US 41 and Rattlesnake Hammock Road. Either alternative is acceptable, but the second alternative may provide additional treatment benefits and may be useful in the permitting process. Both alternatives include schematic littoral zone plantings which should be considered for aesthetic and environmental benefits. Existing Utility Conflicts for Alternative Pond Sites RWA has completed the analysis for potentialutility conflictsandhas concluded that there are no existing utilities within the five alternative pond sites. However, drainage conveyance to and from each pond site will likely have potential conflicts. Generally, each pond site will have drainage pipe from the roadway to the pond and from the pond to the outfall. Pond Site 1 and 2 are located near the project site so conveyance pipe from the road to the pond site would be minimal. However, Pond Site 1 and 2 also require an outfall pipe to the drainage ditch along the west side of Old US 41. Potential Alternative Pond 2 is also located on the eastern side of the railroad and would require two drainage pipes to be directionally drilled beneath the railroad for both drainage to and from the pond. Pond Sites 3, 4 and 5 would require a drainage pipe from the proposed roadway and routed below Old US 41 as well as the drainage ditch on the west side of the road. This will require that the storm pipe be installed extremely deep to go below the bottom of the existing ditch. We do not know the exact depth as there was no survey completed west of Old US 41. This will be completed under a separate contract through Collier County. 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 662 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Page | 19 All the conveyance systems to and from each pond site on the west side of Old US 41 will have a potential impact to existing utilities within the Old US 41 corridor. Based on the information given in this section, Pond Site 1 will have the least potential impact to existing utilities, followed by Pond Site 2, and Pond Sites 3, 4 and 5 will have the greatest impact on existing utilities. Preliminary Opinion of Cost for Alternative Pond Sites Since the design of the collection system for the main roadway does not have an impact on the cost of the infrastructure associated with the three viable alternative pond sites, a preliminary opinion of cost has not been prepared for the common collection system design. A preliminary opinion of cost has been completed for the additional pipe required to carry the discharge from DB 1 to the alternative pond sites. The estimates for each pond site have been provided and are included in Exhibit 19– Opinion of Probable Cost of Collection System Design Alternatives. Right of Way Acquisition Costs The Right-of-Way acquisition costs were estimated from the appraised value of the land based on the data provided on the Collier County Property Appraiser’s website. Additional data can be obtained from Collier County Real Property if desired. Alternative Pond Site Recommendations The analysis presented in the report and summarized in the Pond Siting Matrix indicates that the sites are ranked as follows: 1st – Pond 1 2nd – Pond 5 3rd – Pond 4 4th – Pond 3 5th – Pond 2 Though Pond 1 is the most logical choice based on the proximity to the drainage basin and the matrix scores, it could prove challenging to obtain property as it is part of a conservation area plan. Of the remaining pond sites, Pond 5 appears to be the correct choice as it pertains to the matrix scores, Pond 4 is by far the most logical choice out of the sites that remain considering there are already future Right-of- Way needs on this parcel and there is plenty of room for expansion for the future roadway construction. Additionally, it is very likely that Pond 5 will require the purchase of additional land as it is not large enough to support the stormwater infrastructure needed for both DB 1 and the future expansion of the roadway between Old US 41 and US 41. Therefore, it would seem that Pond 4 would be a more desirable selection with all considerations made, but additional study must be completed in the area west of Old US 41 to prove this out. 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 663 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Page | 20 Therefore, our final recommendations for pond site locations required for DB 1 based on all the information obtained is as follows: 1st – Pond 1 2nd – Pond 4 3rd –Pond5 4th – Pond 3 5th – Pond 2 Conclusions The drainage analysis and pond siting analysis performed produced favorable results for the water quality treatment and attenuation needs for the proposed roadway corridor between Livingston Road and Old US 41. East of the Seminole Gulf Railroad to Livingston Road, there is ample space within the existing County-owned Rights-of-Way for the proposed project needs based on the initial drainage calculations. An alternative pond siting analysis was completed for the portion of the project west of the Railroad as existing overhead lines made storage within the Right-of-Way impossible without relocating the FPL transmission lines. As stated above, additional information must be obtained between US 41 and Old US 41 to further develop the overall property needs for that portion of roadway. This will be completed under a separate contract with Collier County Transportation planning prior to applying for the permits for the western section of the roadway through SFWMD and USACOE. A two-phased approached is recommended for the South Florida Water Management District ERP and the US Army Corp of Engineers IP applications due to the timing of the school project. Phase One as discussed earlier in this report would provide construction access according to the School’s accelerated schedule by March of 2021 and allow time to work out the permit from the Seminole Gulf Railroad and the additional Right-of-Way needs for the alternative pond site West of Old US 41. The Phase Two design, permitting and construction process would provide access from the eastern school entrance to Old US 41 and would give the school permanent access for both the east and west drives as show on the attached site plan exhibit provided by CCPS prior to the projected opening date for the school in August of 2023. 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 664 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) WĂŐĞͮϮϭ y,//dϭ WZK:d>Kd/KEDW 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 665 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) SCALE:RGE:TWP:SEC:DATE:TITLE:CLIENT:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:PROJECTSHEETFILENUMBER:NUMBER:NUMBER:OF6610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200 | Naples, Florida 34109(239) 597-0575 FAX: (239) 597-0578www.consult-rwa.comFlorida Certificates of Authorization EB 7663 LB 6952COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF &200,66,21(56VETERANS MEMORIAL BOULEVARDROADWAY IMPROVEMENTSEXHIBIT - PROJECT LIMITS10/19CustomJSHKMWXX XX XX11COUNTYBARN RDSANTA BARBARA BLVDGOLDENGATE PKWY28.A.18Packet Pg. 666Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, WĂŐĞͮϮϮ y,//dϮ Z/>WZK:d>/D/d^ EWKE^/d>Kd/KE^ 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 667 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) HORIZ. SCALE (FULL):DATECHECKEDDRAWNRGE:TWP:SEC:DATE:TITLE:CLIENT:PROJECT:OFPROJECT NO.:SHEET NUMBER:REVISIONREV #HORIZ. SCALE (HALF):DESIGNED:DRAWN:VERT. SCALE (FULL):VERT. SCALE (HALF):FILE NAME:FLORIDA LICENSE NO.ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTSVETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD.COLLIER COUNT<%2$5'2)&200,66,21(5611190062.00.00SEPTEMBER 20191" = 500'1" = 1000'.. .. ..KMWSCBN/AN/A190062.00.00 EX0265023KEISHA M. WESTBROOK, P.E.EXHIBIT 2 - AERIAL PROJECT LIMITS AND POND SITE LOCATIONS6610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200Naples, Florida 34109(239) 597-0575 FAX: (239) 597-0578www.consult-rwa.comFlorida Certificates of AuthorizationEB 7663 LB695228.A.18Packet Pg. 668Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, WĂŐĞͮϮϯ y,//dϯ >Kd/KEDWE WKEKE&/'hZd/KE^ 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 669 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Feet 0 100 200 TITLE: CLIENT: PROJECT FILE NUMBER: NUMBER: COLLIER COUNTY%2$5'2)&200,66,21(56 ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD. POTENTIAL OFFSITE POND LOCATION6610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200 / Naples, Florida 34109 (239) 597-0575 FAX: (239) 597-0578 www.consult-rwa.com Florida Certificates of Authorization EB 7663 / LB6952 EXHIBIT 3- LOCATION MAP AND POND SITE CONFIGURATION POND ONE 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 670 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Feet 0 100 200 TITLE: CLIENT: PROJECT FILE NUMBER: NUMBER: COLLIER COUNTY £ ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD. POTENTIAL OFFSITE POND LOCATION6610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200 / Naples, Florida 34109 (239) 597-0575 FAX: (239) 597-0578 www.consult-rwa.com Florida Certificates of Authorization EB 7663 / LB6952 EXHIBIT 3- LOCATION MAP AND POND SITE CONFIGURATION POND TWO 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 671 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Feet 0 100 200 TITLE: CLIENT: PROJECT FILE NUMBER: NUMBER: COLLIER COUNTY £ ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD. POTENTIAL OFFSITE POND LOCATION6610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200 / Naples, Florida 34109 (239) 597-0575 FAX: (239) 597-0578 www.consult-rwa.com Florida Certificates of Authorization EB 7663 / LB6952 EXHIBIT 3- LOCATION MAP AND POND SITE CONFIGURATION POND THREE & FOUR 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 672 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Feet 0 100 200 TITLE: CLIENT: PROJECT FILE NUMBER: NUMBER: COLLIER COUNTY £ ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD. POTENTIAL OFFSITE POND LOCATION6610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200 / Naples, Florida 34109 (239) 597-0575 FAX: (239) 597-0578 www.consult-rwa.com Florida Certificates of Authorization EB 7663 / LB6952 EXHIBIT 3- LOCATION MAP AND POND SITE CONFIGURATION POND FIVE 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 673 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) WĂŐĞͮϮϰ y,//dϰ &>h&^DWE^K/>^DW 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 674 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) <> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SUBJECTPROPERTYSUBJECTPROPERTY<> LATITUDE: N 26.302220<> LONGITUDE: W 81.778059<> 00146640104,00145720106,00146080007NAPLES, FL 34110REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:DESIGNED:p:\19094.00 veteran memorial blvd extension\CAD\PERMIT-STATE\19094-STATE-FULL.dwg LOCATION 1/29/2020 THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:MNRMJ01-29-2019094-LOCATION MAP-------------------01 OF 07NESW      8588288641MARCOISLANDEVERGLADESCITY9329846NAPLES90908399483783784129292983983992887846951862I-758486431856850846890896KEY WESTTAMPAFT.MYERSMIAMINAPLESSUBJECTPROPERTY28.A.18Packet Pg. 675Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 621NESW0 300 6001200SCALE IN FEETREV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:DESIGNED:p:\19094.00 veteran memorial blvd extension\CAD\PERMIT-STATE\19094-STATE-FULL.dwg FLUCFCS 1/29/2020 THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:MNRMJ01-29-2019094-FLUCFCS MAP-------------------02 OF 07xSURVEY COURTESY OF:xxSURVEY DATED:NOTES:xTHESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE."RWA, INC."09-03-19624617624411E1411E1624621814PROPERTYLINE411E2411416625E4(2.94 AC.)621(0.12 AC.)411E2625621641814411625E4322411E1621621625E4OSW624E2621740740322D742HAREA "A"AREA "B"AREA "C"AREA "D"624E2621E4625E3411E4625E4411SEE SHEET 5 FOR TABLES1941947441941896SWALE1941896194AREA "B" EXISTING ROAD AREAMATCHLINE ABOVE VIEWMATCHLINE BELOW VIEW28.A.18Packet Pg. 676Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, NESW0 150 300600SCALE IN FEETREV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:DESIGNED:p:\19094.00 veteran memorial blvd extension\CAD\PERMIT-STATE\19094-STATE-FULL.dwg FLUCFCS DET-EAST 1/29/2020 THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:MNRMJ01-29-2019094-FLUCFCS AREAS 'A' & 'B'-------------------03 OF 07411E1617624SCALE: 1" = 300'AREA 'A'SCALE: 1" = 300'AREA 'B'416411PROPERTYLINEPROPERTYLINE411E1411E1624624621814411E2MATCHLINEAREA "A"1112345109678MATCHLINEAREA "C"SEE SHEET 5 FOR TABLESMATCHLINEAREA "B"xSURVEY COURTESY OF:xxSURVEY DATED:NOTES:xTHESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE."RWA, INC."09-03-19MATCLINETO EXISTINGROAD28.A.18Packet Pg. 677Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 621NESW0150300 600SCALE IN FEETREV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:DESIGNED:p:\19094.00 veteran memorial blvd extension\CAD\PERMIT-STATE\19094-STATE-FULL.dwg FLUCFCS DET-WEST 1/29/2020 THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:MNRMJ01-29-2019094-FLUCFCS AREAS 'C' & 'D'-------------------04 OF 08SCALE: 1" = 300'AREA 'C'SCALE: 1" = 300'AREA 'D'PROPERTYLINEPROPERTYLINE12OFFSITEFLUFCFS411621411625E4621322625E4OSW641621E4625E3411E4624E2624E2621625322D411E1621740740742H1115141617182021222324252627624E219SEE SHEET 5 FOR TABLESMATCHLINEAREA "D"MATCHLINEAREA "B"MATCHLINEAREA "C"625E4625E4624E213xSURVEY COURTESY OF:xxSURVEY DATED:NOTES:xTHESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE."RWA, INC."09-03-1928.A.18Packet Pg. 678Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:DESIGNED:p:\19094.00 veteran memorial blvd extension\CAD\PERMIT-STATE\19094-STATE-FULL.dwg FLUCFCS TABLES 1/29/2020 THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:MNRMJ01-29-2019094-FLUCFCS TABLES-------------------05 OF 07FLUCFCS AREAS 'A' & 'B'IDFLUCFCSDESCRIPTIONAREA(AC)1411E1PINE FLATWOODS (EXOTICS 0-25%)17.012624CYPRESS - PINE - CABBAGE PALM0.013617 MIXED WETLAND HARDWOODS0.314 624CYPRESS - PINE - CABBAGE PALM0.085814ROADS AND HIGHWAYS0.156411E2PINE FLATWOODS (EXOTICS 25-50%)2.917411PINE FLATWOODS1.748416SCRUBBY FLATWOODS0.719621CYPRESS0.3210 624CYPRESS - PINE - CABBAGE PALM0.35TOTAL23.59FLUCFCS AREAS 'C' & 'D'IDFLUCFCSDESCRIPTIONAREA(AC)11625 HYDRIC PINE FLATWOODS0.2012621E4CYPRESS (EXOTICS 75-100%)0.3913 624E2CYPRESS - PINE - CABBAGE PALM(EXOTICS 25-50%)0.0214641FRESHWATER MARSH0.1515 621CYPRESS0.8816 625E3HYDRIC PINE FLATWOODS (EXOTICS50-75%)0.7517624E2CYPRESS - PINE - CABBAGE PALM(EXOTICS 25-50%)1.5418411PINE FLATWOODS0.5519 411E4PINE FLATWOODS (EXOTICS 75-100%)0.2220621CYPRESS0.6721625E4HYDRIC PINE FLATWOODS (EXOTICS75-100%)0.9522 411 PINE FLATWOODS1.5823 625E4HYDRIC PINE FLATWOODS (EXOTICS75-100%)0.1724322DCOASTAL SCRUB (DISTURBED)3.4025OSW OTHER SURFACE WATER0.2426 740DISTURBED LANDS5.6727 742HBORROW AREAS (HYDRIC)3.17TOTAL 20.55UPLAND (ACRES):WETLAND (ACRES):PROJECT (ACRES):UPLAND (ACRES):WETLAND (ACRES):PROJECT (ACRES):WATER (ACRES):28.A.18Packet Pg. 679Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, NESW0150300 600SCALE IN FEETREV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:DESIGNED:p:\19094.00 veteran memorial blvd extension\CAD\PERMIT-STATE\19094-STATE-FULL.dwg FLUCFCS DET (2) 1/29/2020 THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:THRMJ01-29-2019094-EXISTING ROADWAY FLUCFCS-------------------06 OF 07SCALE: 1" = 300'EXISTING ROADWAY FLUCFCSPROPERTYLINE19428UPLAND (ACRES):WETLAND (ACRES):PROJECT (ACRES):xSURVEY COURTESY OF:xxSURVEY DATED:NOTES:xTHESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE."RWA, INC."09-03-19EXISTING ROADWAY FLUCFCSIDFLUCFCSDESCRIPTIONAREA(AC)28 194OTHER OPEN LAND5.9929 194OTHER OPEN LAND0.2630744FILL AREAS (ROADWAYS)0.2531 194 OTHER OPEN LAND 1.61321896 OTHER RECREATION - SIDEWALK0.02331896 OTHER RECREATION - SIDEWALK0.0634SWALESWALE0.0735194OTHER OPEN LAND0.1936194OTHER OPEN LAND0.5137 1896OTHER RECREATION - SIDEWALK0.11388144 COUNTY MAINTAINED ROADWAY 1.9739194 OTHER OPEN LAND0.2340 1896OTHER RECREATION - SIDEWALK0.0941194OTHER OPEN LAND0.19TOTAL 11.55744301942919431189632189633SWALE3418963519437361941896404119481443839194LIVINGSTON RDMATCHLINEAREA "A"28.A.18Packet Pg. 680Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, NESW0 600 12002400SCALE IN FEETREV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:DESIGNED:p:\19094.00 veteran memorial blvd extension\CAD\PERMIT-STATE\19094-STATE-FULL.dwg SOILS 1/29/2020 THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:MNRMJ01-29-2019094-SOILS MAP-------------------07 OF 07xSURVEY COURTESY OF:xxSURVEY DATED:NOTES:xTHESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.xSOIL DATA PROVIDED BY:1998 UNITED STATES DEPT OF AGRICULTURESOIL SURVEY OF COLLIER COUNTY AREA, FL"RWA, INC."09-03-1914332125397187CODEDESCRIPTIONHYDRIC7 IMMOKALEE FINE SAND14PINEDA FINE SAND, LIMESTONESUBSTRATUMYES18RIVIERA FINE SAND, LIMESTONESUBSTRATUMYES21BOCA FINE SAND25BOCA, RIVIERA, LIMESTONESUBSTRATUM, AND COPELAND FINESANDS, DEPRESSIONALYES33URBAN LAND-HOLOPAW-BASINGERCOMPLEX38URBAN LAND-MATLACHA-BOCACOMPLEX39 SATELLITE FINE SAND2714314PROPERTYLINEPROPERTYLINE28.A.18Packet Pg. 681Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, WĂŐĞͮϮϱ y,//dϱ WZ>/D/EZz^hZszd 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 682 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) HORIZ. SCALE (FULL):DATECHECKEDDRAWNRGE:TWP:SEC:DATE:TITLE:CLIENT:PROJECT:OFWORK PROJECT NO.:SHEET NUMBER:REVISIONREV #HORIZ. SCALE (HALF):FIELD CREWDRAWN:FIELD BOOK/PAGESFILE NAME: VETERANS MEMORIAL BOULEVARDCOLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENTBOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERSCONTROLSURVEY16160092.00.009/12/19 1"=###'1"=####'10-1548S 25ECSL, MKVDAM 9/12/19496/3, 499/49-5203 CS REV01_________________________________________________________∆/PW28.A.18Packet Pg. 683Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, HORIZ. SCALE (FULL):DATECHECKEDDRAWNRGE:TWP:SEC:DATE:TITLE:CLIENT:PROJECT:OFWORK PROJECT NO.:SHEET NUMBER:REVISIONREV #HORIZ. SCALE (HALF):FIELD CREWDRAWN:FIELD BOOK/PAGESFILE NAME: VETERANS MEMORIAL BOULEVARDCOLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENTBOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERSCONTROLSURVEY26160092.00.009/12/19 1"=100'1"=200'10-1548S 25ECSL, MKVDAM 9/12/19496/3, 499/49-5203 CS REV0128.A.18Packet Pg. 684Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, HORIZ. SCALE (FULL):DATECHECKEDDRAWNRGE:TWP:SEC:DATE:TITLE:CLIENT:PROJECT:OFWORK PROJECT NO.:SHEET NUMBER:REVISIONREV #HORIZ. SCALE (HALF):FIELD CREWDRAWN:FIELD BOOK/PAGESFILE NAME: VETERANS MEMORIAL BOULEVARDCOLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENTBOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERSCONTROLSURVEY36160092.00.009/12/19 1"=100'1"=200'10-1548S 25ECSL, MKVDAM 9/12/19496/3, 499/49-5203 CS REV0128.A.18Packet Pg. 685Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, HORIZ. SCALE (FULL):DATECHECKEDDRAWNRGE:TWP:SEC:DATE:TITLE:CLIENT:PROJECT:OFWORK PROJECT NO.:SHEET NUMBER:REVISIONREV #HORIZ. SCALE (HALF):FIELD CREWDRAWN:FIELD BOOK/PAGESFILE NAME: VETERANS MEMORIAL BOULEVARDCOLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENTBOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERSCONTROLSURVEY46160092.00.009/12/19 1"=100'1"=200'10-1548S 25ECSL, MKVDAM 9/12/19496/3, 499/49-5203 CS REV0128.A.18Packet Pg. 686Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, HORIZ. SCALE (FULL):DATECHECKEDDRAWNRGE:TWP:SEC:DATE:TITLE:CLIENT:PROJECT:OFWORK PROJECT NO.:SHEET NUMBER:REVISIONREV #HORIZ. SCALE (HALF):FIELD CREWDRAWN:FIELD BOOK/PAGESFILE NAME: VETERANS MEMORIAL BOULEVARDCOLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENTBOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERSCONTROLSURVEY56160092.00.009/12/19 1"=100'1"=200'10-1548S 25ECSL, MKVDAM 9/12/19496/3, 499/49-5203 CS REV0128.A.18Packet Pg. 687Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, HORIZ. SCALE (FULL):DATECHECKEDDRAWNRGE:TWP:SEC:DATE:TITLE:CLIENT:PROJECT:OFWORK PROJECT NO.:SHEET NUMBER:REVISIONREV #HORIZ. SCALE (HALF):FIELD CREWDRAWN:FIELD BOOK/PAGESFILE NAME: VETERANS MEMORIAL BOULEVARDCOLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENTBOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERSCONTROLSURVEY66160092.00.009/12/19 1"=100'1"=200'10-1548S 25ECSL, MKVDAM 9/12/19496/3, 499/49-5203 CS REV0128.A.18Packet Pg. 688Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, HORIZ. SCALE (FULL):DATECHECKEDDRAWNRGE:TWP:SEC:DATE:TITLE:CLIENT:PROJECT:OFWORK PROJECT NO.:SHEET NUMBER:REVISIONREV #HORIZ. SCALE (HALF):FIELD CREWDRAWN:FIELD BOOK/PAGESFILE NAME: VETERANS MEMORIAL BOULEVARDCOLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENTBOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERSRIGHT OF WAY MAPCOVER SHEET111160092.00.009/12/19 1"=NA'1"=NA'10-1548S 25ECSL, MKVDAM 9/12/19496/3, 499/49-5207 RW REV01∆28.A.18Packet Pg. 689Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, HORIZ. SCALE (FULL):DATECHECKEDDRAWNRGE:TWP:SEC:DATE:TITLE:CLIENT:PROJECT:OFWORK PROJECT NO.:SHEET NUMBER:REVISIONREV #HORIZ. SCALE (HALF):FIELD CREWDRAWN:FIELD BOOK/PAGESFILE NAME: VETERANS MEMORIAL BOULEVARDCOLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENTBOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERSRIGHT OF WAY MAPSTA. 39+65.85 TO 52+00211160092.00.009/12/19 1"=50'1"=100'10-1548S 25ECSL, MKVDAM 9/12/19496/3, 499/49-5207 RW REV0128.A.18Packet Pg. 690Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, HORIZ. SCALE (FULL):DATECHECKEDDRAWNRGE:TWP:SEC:DATE:TITLE:CLIENT:PROJECT:OFWORK PROJECT NO.:SHEET NUMBER:REVISIONREV #HORIZ. SCALE (HALF):FIELD CREWDRAWN:FIELD BOOK/PAGESFILE NAME: VETERANS MEMORIAL BOULEVARDCOLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENTBOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERSRIGHT OF WAY MAPSTA. 52+00 TO 64+00311160092.00.009/12/19 1"=50'1"=100.0001'10-1548S 25ECSL, MKVDAM 9/12/19496/3, 499/49-5207 RW REV0128.A.18Packet Pg. 691Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, HORIZ. SCALE (FULL):DATECHECKEDDRAWNRGE:TWP:SEC:DATE:TITLE:CLIENT:PROJECT:OFWORK PROJECT NO.:SHEET NUMBER:REVISIONREV #HORIZ. SCALE (HALF):FIELD CREWDRAWN:FIELD BOOK/PAGESFILE NAME: VETERANS MEMORIAL BOULEVARDC.R. ###, PHASE ??COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENTBOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERSRIGHT OF WAY MAPSTA. 64+00 TO 76+00411160092.00.009/12/19 1"=50'1"=100.0001'10-1548S 25ECSL, MKVDAM 9/12/19496/3, 499/49-5207 RW REV0128.A.18Packet Pg. 692Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, HORIZ. SCALE (FULL):DATECHECKEDDRAWNRGE:TWP:SEC:DATE:TITLE:CLIENT:PROJECT:OFWORK PROJECT NO.:SHEET NUMBER:REVISIONREV #HORIZ. SCALE (HALF):FIELD CREWDRAWN:FIELD BOOK/PAGESFILE NAME: VETERANS MEMORIAL BOULEVARDCOLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENTBOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERSRIGHT OF WAY MAPSTA. 76+00 TO 88+00511160092.00.009/12/19 1"=50'1"=100.0001'10-1548S 25ECSL, MKVDAM 9/12/19496/3, 499/49-5207 RW REV0128.A.18Packet Pg. 693Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, HORIZ. SCALE (FULL):DATECHECKEDDRAWNRGE:TWP:SEC:DATE:TITLE:CLIENT:PROJECT:OFWORK PROJECT NO.:SHEET NUMBER:REVISIONREV #HORIZ. SCALE (HALF):FIELD CREWDRAWN:FIELD BOOK/PAGESFILE NAME: VETERANS MEMORIAL BOULEVARDCOLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENTBOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERSRIGHT OF WAY MAPSTA. 88+00 TO 100+00611160092.00.009/12/19 1"=50'1"=100.0001'10-1548S 25ECSL, MKVDAM 9/12/19496/3, 499/49-5207 RW REV0128.A.18Packet Pg. 694Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, HORIZ. SCALE (FULL):DATECHECKEDDRAWNRGE:TWP:SEC:DATE:TITLE:CLIENT:PROJECT:OFWORK PROJECT NO.:SHEET NUMBER:REVISIONREV #HORIZ. SCALE (HALF):FIELD CREWDRAWN:FIELD BOOK/PAGESFILE NAME: VETERANS MEMORIAL BOULEVARDCOLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENTBOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERSRIGHT OF WAY MAPSTA. 100+00 TO 112+00711160092.00.009/12/19 1"=50'1"=100.0001'10-1548S 25ECSL, MKVDAM 9/12/19496/3, 499/49-5207 RW REV0128.A.18Packet Pg. 695Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, HORIZ. SCALE (FULL):DATECHECKEDDRAWNRGE:TWP:SEC:DATE:TITLE:CLIENT:PROJECT:OFWORK PROJECT NO.:SHEET NUMBER:REVISIONREV #HORIZ. SCALE (HALF):FIELD CREWDRAWN:FIELD BOOK/PAGESFILE NAME: VETERANS MEMORIAL BOULEVARDCOLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENTBOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERSRIGHT OF WAY MAPSTA. 112+00 TO 124+00811160092.00.009/12/19 1"=50'1"=100.0001'10-1548S 25ECSL, MKVDAM 9/12/19496/3, 499/49-5207 RW REV0128.A.18Packet Pg. 696Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, HORIZ. SCALE (FULL):DATECHECKEDDRAWNRGE:TWP:SEC:DATE:TITLE:CLIENT:PROJECT:OFWORK PROJECT NO.:SHEET NUMBER:REVISIONREV #HORIZ. SCALE (HALF):FIELD CREWDRAWN:FIELD BOOK/PAGESFILE NAME: VETERANS MEMORIAL BOULEVARDCOLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENTBOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERSRIGHT OF WAY MAPSTA. 124+00 TO 136+00911160092.00.009/12/19 1"=50'1"=100.0001'10-1548S 25ECSL, MKVDAM 9/12/19496/3, 499/49-5207 RW REV0128.A.18Packet Pg. 697Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, HORIZ. SCALE (FULL):DATECHECKEDDRAWNRGE:TWP:SEC:DATE:TITLE:CLIENT:PROJECT:OFWORK PROJECT NO.:SHEET NUMBER:REVISIONREV #HORIZ. SCALE (HALF):FIELD CREWDRAWN:FIELD BOOK/PAGESFILE NAME: VETERANS MEMORIAL BOULEVARDCOLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENTBOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERSRIGHT OF WAY MAPSTA. 136+00 TO 148+0010 11160092.00.009/12/19 1"=50'1"=100.0001'10-1548S 25ECSL, MKVDAM 9/12/19496/3, 499/49-5207 RW REV0128.A.18Packet Pg. 698Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, HORIZ. SCALE (FULL):DATECHECKEDDRAWNRGE:TWP:SEC:DATE:TITLE:CLIENT:PROJECT:OFWORK PROJECT NO.:SHEET NUMBER:REVISIONREV #HORIZ. SCALE (HALF):FIELD CREWDRAWN:FIELD BOOK/PAGESFILE NAME: VETERANS MEMORIAL BOULEVARDCOLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENTBOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERSRIGHT OF WAY MAPSTA. 148+00 TO 160+4611 11160092.00.009/12/19 1"=50'1"=100.0001'10-1548S 25ECSL, MKVDAM 9/12/19496/3, 499/49-5207 RW REV0128.A.18Packet Pg. 699Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, HORIZ. SCALE (FULL):DATECHECKEDDRAWNRGE:TWP:SEC:DATE:TITLE:CLIENT:PROJECT:OFWORK PROJECT NO.:SHEET NUMBER:REVISIONREV #HORIZ. SCALE (HALF):FIELD CREWDRAWN:FIELD BOOK/PAGESFILE NAME: VETERANS MEMORIAL BOULEVARDC.R. ###, PHASE ??COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENTBOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERSRIGHT OF WAY MAPCOVER SHEET111160092.00.009/12/19 1"=NA'1"=NA'10-1548S 25ECSL, MKVDAM 9/12/19496/3, 499/49-5207 RW∆DRAFT28.A.18Packet Pg. 700Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, HORIZ. SCALE (FULL):DATECHECKEDDRAWNRGE:TWP:SEC:DATE:TITLE:CLIENT:PROJECT:OFWORK PROJECT NO.:SHEET NUMBER:REVISIONREV #HORIZ. SCALE (HALF):FIELD CREWDRAWN:FIELD BOOK/PAGESFILE NAME: VETERANS MEMORIAL BOULEVARDC.R. ###, PHASE ??COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENTBOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERSRIGHT OF WAY MAPSTA. 39+65.85 TO 52+00211160092.00.009/12/19 1"=50'1"=100'10-1548S 25ECSL, MKVDAM 9/12/19496/3, 499/49-5207 RWDRAFT28.A.18Packet Pg. 701Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, HORIZ. SCALE (FULL):DATECHECKEDDRAWNRGE:TWP:SEC:DATE:TITLE:CLIENT:PROJECT:OFWORK PROJECT NO.:SHEET NUMBER:REVISIONREV #HORIZ. SCALE (HALF):FIELD CREWDRAWN:FIELD BOOK/PAGESFILE NAME: VETERANS MEMORIAL BOULEVARDC.R. ###, PHASE ??COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENTBOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERSRIGHT OF WAY MAPSTA. 52+00 TO 64+00311160092.00.009/12/19 1"=50'1"=100.0001'10-1548S 25ECSL, MKVDAM 9/12/19496/3, 499/49-5207 RWDRAFT28.A.18Packet Pg. 702Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, HORIZ. SCALE (FULL):DATECHECKEDDRAWNRGE:TWP:SEC:DATE:TITLE:CLIENT:PROJECT:OFWORK PROJECT NO.:SHEET NUMBER:REVISIONREV #HORIZ. SCALE (HALF):FIELD CREWDRAWN:FIELD BOOK/PAGESFILE NAME: VETERANS MEMORIAL BOULEVARDC.R. ###, PHASE ??COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENTBOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERSRIGHT OF WAY MAPSTA. 64+00 TO 76+00411160092.00.009/12/19 1"=50'1"=100.0001'10-1548S 25ECSL, MKVDAM 9/12/19496/3, 499/49-5207 RWDRAFT28.A.18Packet Pg. 703Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, HORIZ. SCALE (FULL):DATECHECKEDDRAWNRGE:TWP:SEC:DATE:TITLE:CLIENT:PROJECT:OFWORK PROJECT NO.:SHEET NUMBER:REVISIONREV #HORIZ. SCALE (HALF):FIELD CREWDRAWN:FIELD BOOK/PAGESFILE NAME: VETERANS MEMORIAL BOULEVARDC.R. ###, PHASE ??COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENTBOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERSRIGHT OF WAY MAPSTA. 76+00 TO 88+00511160092.00.009/12/19 1"=50'1"=100.0001'10-1548S 25ECSL, MKVDAM 9/12/19496/3, 499/49-5207 RWDRAFT28.A.18Packet Pg. 704Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, HORIZ. SCALE (FULL):DATECHECKEDDRAWNRGE:TWP:SEC:DATE:TITLE:CLIENT:PROJECT:OFWORK PROJECT NO.:SHEET NUMBER:REVISIONREV #HORIZ. SCALE (HALF):FIELD CREWDRAWN:FIELD BOOK/PAGESFILE NAME: VETERANS MEMORIAL BOULEVARDC.R. ###, PHASE ??COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENTBOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERSRIGHT OF WAY MAPSTA. 88+00 TO 100+00611160092.00.009/12/19 1"=50'1"=100.0001'10-1548S 25ECSL, MKVDAM 9/12/19496/3, 499/49-5207 RWDRAFT28.A.18Packet Pg. 705Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, HORIZ. SCALE (FULL):DATECHECKEDDRAWNRGE:TWP:SEC:DATE:TITLE:CLIENT:PROJECT:OFWORK PROJECT NO.:SHEET NUMBER:REVISIONREV #HORIZ. SCALE (HALF):FIELD CREWDRAWN:FIELD BOOK/PAGESFILE NAME: VETERANS MEMORIAL BOULEVARDC.R. ###, PHASE ??COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENTBOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERSRIGHT OF WAY MAPSTA. 100+00 TO 112+00711160092.00.009/12/19 1"=50'1"=100.0001'10-1548S 25ECSL, MKVDAM 9/12/19496/3, 499/49-5207 RWDRAFT28.A.18Packet Pg. 706Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, HORIZ. SCALE (FULL):DATECHECKEDDRAWNRGE:TWP:SEC:DATE:TITLE:CLIENT:PROJECT:OFWORK PROJECT NO.:SHEET NUMBER:REVISIONREV #HORIZ. SCALE (HALF):FIELD CREWDRAWN:FIELD BOOK/PAGESFILE NAME: VETERANS MEMORIAL BOULEVARDC.R. ###, PHASE ??COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENTBOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERSRIGHT OF WAY MAPSTA. 112+00 TO 124+00811160092.00.009/12/19 1"=50'1"=100.0001'10-1548S 25ECSL, MKVDAM 9/12/19496/3, 499/49-5207 RWDRAFT28.A.18Packet Pg. 707Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, HORIZ. SCALE (FULL):DATECHECKEDDRAWNRGE:TWP:SEC:DATE:TITLE:CLIENT:PROJECT:OFWORK PROJECT NO.:SHEET NUMBER:REVISIONREV #HORIZ. SCALE (HALF):FIELD CREWDRAWN:FIELD BOOK/PAGESFILE NAME: VETERANS MEMORIAL BOULEVARDC.R. ###, PHASE ??COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENTBOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERSRIGHT OF WAY MAPSTA. 124+00 TO 136+00911160092.00.009/12/19 1"=50'1"=100.0001'10-1548S 25ECSL, MKVDAM 9/12/19496/3, 499/49-5207 RWDRAFT28.A.18Packet Pg. 708Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, HORIZ. SCALE (FULL):DATECHECKEDDRAWNRGE:TWP:SEC:DATE:TITLE:CLIENT:PROJECT:OFWORK PROJECT NO.:SHEET NUMBER:REVISIONREV #HORIZ. SCALE (HALF):FIELD CREWDRAWN:FIELD BOOK/PAGESFILE NAME: VETERANS MEMORIAL BOULEVARDC.R. ###, PHASE ??COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENTBOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERSRIGHT OF WAY MAPSTA. 136+00 TO 148+0010 11160092.00.009/12/19 1"=50'1"=100.0001'10-1548S 25ECSL, MKVDAM 9/12/19496/3, 499/49-5207 RWDRAFT28.A.18Packet Pg. 709Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, HORIZ. SCALE (FULL):DATECHECKEDDRAWNRGE:TWP:SEC:DATE:TITLE:CLIENT:PROJECT:OFWORK PROJECT NO.:SHEET NUMBER:REVISIONREV #HORIZ. SCALE (HALF):FIELD CREWDRAWN:FIELD BOOK/PAGESFILE NAME: VETERANS MEMORIAL BOULEVARDC.R. ###, PHASE ??COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENTBOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERSRIGHT OF WAY MAPSTA. 148+00 TO 160+4611 11160092.00.009/12/19 1"=50'1"=100.0001'10-1548S 25ECSL, MKVDAM 9/12/19496/3, 499/49-5207 RWDRAFT28.A.18Packet Pg. 710Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, WĂŐĞͮϮϲ y,//dϲ WZ>/D/EZz,KZ/KEd>E sZd/>'KDdZzW>E 28.A.18Packet Pg. 711Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, ENGINEER'S SEAL:February 12, 2020 2:22 PM K:\2019\190062.00.00 Veterans Memorial Boulevard\014 Environmental Resource Permit (erp) Application\currentplansrestored\current Plans\sheet Files\01 1900620000W CS01.dwgPROJECT No.:DATE:OFSHEET No.:6610 Willow Park DriveSuite 200Naples, FL 341094983 Royal Gulf Circle Fort Myers, FL 3396619503 S West Villages PkwyUnit A5Venice, FL 34293Office: (239) 597-0575Fax: (239) 597-0578www.consult-rwa.comFlorida Certificates ofAuthorizationEB 7663 LB 69522885 S HORSESHOE DRBEGIN PROJECT IMPROVEMENTSSTA. 38+25.00END PROJECT IMPROVEMENTSSTA. 158+89.00SHEET LIST TABLESHEET NUMBERSHEET TITLE1COVER SHEET2TYPICAL SECTIONS 013TYPICAL SECTIONS 024TYPICAL SECTIONS 035VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD STA 38+25-46+006VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD STA 46+00-56+007VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD STA 56+00-66+008VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD STA 66+00-76+009VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD STA 76+00-86+0010VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD STA 86+00-96+0011VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD STA 96+00-106+0012VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD STA 106+00-116+0013VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD STA 116+00-126+0014VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD STA 126+00-137+0015VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD STA 136+00-146+0016VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD STA 146+00-158+8917INTERSECTION PLAN 0118INTERSECTION PLAN 0219LAKE PLAN28.A.18Packet Pg. 712Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, HORIZ. SCALE (FULL):DATECHECKEDDRAWNRGE:TWP:SEC:DATE:TITLE:CLIENT:PROJECT:OFPROJECT NO.:SHEET NUMBER:REVISIONREV #HORIZ. SCALE (HALF):DESIGNED:DRAWN:VERT. SCALE (FULL):VERT. SCALE (HALF):FILE NAME:FLORIDA LICENSE NO.VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD.£COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS219190062.00.002019-08-15Custom1" = 13 1/8'10/11 48 25KMWJSHN/AN/A02 1900620000W TS0165023KEISH M. WESTBROOK, P.E.TYPICAL SECTIONS6610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200Naples, Florida 34109(239) 597-0575 FAX: (239) 597-0578www.consult-rwa.comFlorida Certificates of AuthorizationEB 7663 LB695228.A.18Packet Pg. 713Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, HORIZ. SCALE (FULL):DATECHECKEDDRAWNRGE:TWP:SEC:DATE:TITLE:CLIENT:PROJECT:OFPROJECT NO.:SHEET NUMBER:REVISIONREV #HORIZ. SCALE (HALF):DESIGNED:DRAWN:VERT. SCALE (FULL):VERT. SCALE (HALF):FILE NAME:FLORIDA LICENSE NO.VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD.£COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS319190062.00.002019-08-15Custom1" = 13 1/8'10/11 48 25KMWJSHN/AN/A03 1900620000W TS0265023KEISH M. WESTBROOK, P.E.TYPICAL SECTIONS6610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200Naples, Florida 34109(239) 597-0575 FAX: (239) 597-0578www.consult-rwa.comFlorida Certificates of AuthorizationEB 7663 LB695228.A.18Packet Pg. 714Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, HORIZ. SCALE (FULL):DATECHECKEDDRAWNRGE:TWP:SEC:DATE:TITLE:CLIENT:PROJECT:OFPROJECT NO.:SHEET NUMBER:REVISIONREV #HORIZ. SCALE (HALF):DESIGNED:DRAWN:VERT. SCALE (FULL):VERT. SCALE (HALF):FILE NAME:FLORIDA LICENSE NO.VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD.£COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS419190062.00.002019-08-15N/AN/A10/11 48 25KMWJSHN/AN/A04 1900620000W TS0365023KEISH M. WESTBROOK, P.E.RAILROAD CROSS SECTION6610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200Naples, Florida 34109(239) 597-0575 FAX: (239) 597-0578www.consult-rwa.comFlorida Certificates of AuthorizationEB 7663 LB6952060120HORIZONTAL SCALE : 1"= 1'VERTICAL SCALE : 1"= 1'28.A.18Packet Pg. 715Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, HORIZ. SCALE (FULL):DATECHECKEDDRAWNRGE:TWP:SEC:DATE:TITLE:CLIENT:PROJECT:OFPROJECT NO.:SHEET NUMBER:REVISIONREV #HORIZ. SCALE (HALF):DESIGNED:DRAWN:VERT. SCALE (FULL):VERT. SCALE (HALF):FILE NAME:FLORIDA LICENSE NO.VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD.£COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS519190062.00.002019-08-151" = 40'1" = 80'10/11 48 25KMWJSHN/AN/A05 1900620000W PP0165023KEISH M. WESTBROOK, P.E.VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD STA 38+25-46+00Feet040806610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200Naples, Florida 34109(239) 597-0575 FAX: (239) 597-0578www.consult-rwa.comFlorida Certificates of AuthorizationEB 7663 LB6952PLANS AND PROFILE SHEET INDEX28.A.18Packet Pg. 716Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, HORIZ. SCALE (FULL):DATECHECKEDDRAWNRGE:TWP:SEC:DATE:TITLE:CLIENT:PROJECT:OFPROJECT NO.:SHEET NUMBER:REVISIONREV #HORIZ. SCALE (HALF):DESIGNED:DRAWN:VERT. SCALE (FULL):VERT. SCALE (HALF):FILE NAME:FLORIDA LICENSE NO.VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD.£COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS619190062.00.002019-08-151" = 40'1" = 80'10/11 48 25KMWJSHN/AN/A06 1900620000W PP0265023KEISH M. WESTBROOK, P.E.VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD STA 46+00-56+00Feet040806610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200Naples, Florida 34109(239) 597-0575 FAX: (239) 597-0578www.consult-rwa.comFlorida Certificates of AuthorizationEB 7663 LB6952PLANS AND PROFILE SHEET INDEX28.A.18Packet Pg. 717Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, HORIZ. SCALE (FULL):DATECHECKEDDRAWNRGE:TWP:SEC:DATE:TITLE:CLIENT:PROJECT:OFPROJECT NO.:SHEET NUMBER:REVISIONREV #HORIZ. SCALE (HALF):DESIGNED:DRAWN:VERT. SCALE (FULL):VERT. SCALE (HALF):FILE NAME:FLORIDA LICENSE NO.VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD.£COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS719190062.00.002019-08-151" = 40'1" = 80'10/11 48 25KMWJSHN/AN/A07 1900620000W PP0365023KEISH M. WESTBROOK, P.E.VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD STA 56+00-66+00Feet040806610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200Naples, Florida 34109(239) 597-0575 FAX: (239) 597-0578www.consult-rwa.comFlorida Certificates of AuthorizationEB 7663 LB6952PLANS AND PROFILE SHEET INDEX28.A.18Packet Pg. 718Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, HORIZ. SCALE (FULL):DATECHECKEDDRAWNRGE:TWP:SEC:DATE:TITLE:CLIENT:PROJECT:OFPROJECT NO.:SHEET NUMBER:REVISIONREV #HORIZ. SCALE (HALF):DESIGNED:DRAWN:VERT. SCALE (FULL):VERT. SCALE (HALF):FILE NAME:FLORIDA LICENSE NO.VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD.£COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS819190062.00.002019-08-151" = 40'1" = 80'10/11 48 25KMWJSHN/AN/A08 1900620000W PP0465023KEISH M. WESTBROOK, P.E.VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD STA 66+00-76+00Feet040806610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200Naples, Florida 34109(239) 597-0575 FAX: (239) 597-0578www.consult-rwa.comFlorida Certificates of AuthorizationEB 7663 LB6952PLANS AND PROFILE SHEET INDEX28.A.18Packet Pg. 719Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, HORIZ. SCALE (FULL):DATECHECKEDDRAWNRGE:TWP:SEC:DATE:TITLE:CLIENT:PROJECT:OFPROJECT NO.:SHEET NUMBER:REVISIONREV #HORIZ. SCALE (HALF):DESIGNED:DRAWN:VERT. SCALE (FULL):VERT. SCALE (HALF):FILE NAME:FLORIDA LICENSE NO.VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD.£COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS919190062.00.002019-08-151" = 40'1" = 80'10/11 48 25KMWJSHN/AN/A09 1900620000W PP0565023KEISH M. WESTBROOK, P.E.VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD STA 76+00-86+00Feet040806610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200Naples, Florida 34109(239) 597-0575 FAX: (239) 597-0578www.consult-rwa.comFlorida Certificates of AuthorizationEB 7663 LB6952PLANS AND PROFILE SHEET INDEX28.A.18Packet Pg. 720Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, HORIZ. SCALE (FULL):DATECHECKEDDRAWNRGE:TWP:SEC:DATE:TITLE:CLIENT:PROJECT:OFPROJECT NO.:SHEET NUMBER:REVISIONREV #HORIZ. SCALE (HALF):DESIGNED:DRAWN:VERT. SCALE (FULL):VERT. SCALE (HALF):FILE NAME:FLORIDA LICENSE NO.VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD.£COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS10 19190062.00.002019-08-151" = 40'1" = 80'10/11 48 25KMWJSHN/AN/A10 1900620000W PP0665023KEISH M. WESTBROOK, P.E.VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD STA 86+00-96+00Feet040806610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200Naples, Florida 34109(239) 597-0575 FAX: (239) 597-0578www.consult-rwa.comFlorida Certificates of AuthorizationEB 7663 LB6952PLANS AND PROFILE SHEET INDEX28.A.18Packet Pg. 721Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, HORIZ. SCALE (FULL):DATECHECKEDDRAWNRGE:TWP:SEC:DATE:TITLE:CLIENT:PROJECT:OFPROJECT NO.:SHEET NUMBER:REVISIONREV #HORIZ. SCALE (HALF):DESIGNED:DRAWN:VERT. SCALE (FULL):VERT. SCALE (HALF):FILE NAME:FLORIDA LICENSE NO.VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD.£COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS11 19190062.00.002019-08-151" = 40'1" = 80'10/11 48 25KMWJSHN/AN/A11 1900620000W PP0765023KEISH M. WESTBROOK, P.E.VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD STA 96+00-106+00Feet040806610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200Naples, Florida 34109(239) 597-0575 FAX: (239) 597-0578www.consult-rwa.comFlorida Certificates of AuthorizationEB 7663 LB6952PLANS AND PROFILE SHEET INDEX28.A.18Packet Pg. 722Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, HORIZ. SCALE (FULL):DATECHECKEDDRAWNRGE:TWP:SEC:DATE:TITLE:CLIENT:PROJECT:OFPROJECT NO.:SHEET NUMBER:REVISIONREV #HORIZ. SCALE (HALF):DESIGNED:DRAWN:VERT. SCALE (FULL):VERT. SCALE (HALF):FILE NAME:FLORIDA LICENSE NO.VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD.£COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS12 19190062.00.002019-08-151" = 40'1" = 80'10/11 48 25KMWJSHN/AN/A12 1900620000W PP0865023KEISH M. WESTBROOK, P.E.VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD STA 106+00-116+00Feet040806610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200Naples, Florida 34109(239) 597-0575 FAX: (239) 597-0578www.consult-rwa.comFlorida Certificates of AuthorizationEB 7663 LB6952PLANS AND PROFILE SHEET INDEX28.A.18Packet Pg. 723Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, HORIZ. SCALE (FULL):DATECHECKEDDRAWNRGE:TWP:SEC:DATE:TITLE:CLIENT:PROJECT:OFPROJECT NO.:SHEET NUMBER:REVISIONREV #HORIZ. SCALE (HALF):DESIGNED:DRAWN:VERT. SCALE (FULL):VERT. SCALE (HALF):FILE NAME:FLORIDA LICENSE NO.VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD.£COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS13 19190062.00.002019-08-151" = 40'1" = 80'10/11 48 25KMWJSHN/AN/A13 1900620000W PP0965023KEISH M. WESTBROOK, P.E.VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD STA 116+00-126+00Feet040806610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200Naples, Florida 34109(239) 597-0575 FAX: (239) 597-0578www.consult-rwa.comFlorida Certificates of AuthorizationEB 7663 LB6952PLANS AND PROFILE SHEET INDEX28.A.18Packet Pg. 724Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, HORIZ. SCALE (FULL):DATECHECKEDDRAWNRGE:TWP:SEC:DATE:TITLE:CLIENT:PROJECT:OFPROJECT NO.:SHEET NUMBER:REVISIONREV #HORIZ. SCALE (HALF):DESIGNED:DRAWN:VERT. SCALE (FULL):VERT. SCALE (HALF):FILE NAME:FLORIDA LICENSE NO.VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD.£COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS14 19190062.00.002019-08-151" = 40'1" = 80'10/11 48 25KMWJSHN/AN/A14 1900620000W PP1065023KEISH M. WESTBROOK, P.E.VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD STA 126+00-137+00Feet040806610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200Naples, Florida 34109(239) 597-0575 FAX: (239) 597-0578www.consult-rwa.comFlorida Certificates of AuthorizationEB 7663 LB6952PLANS AND PROFILE SHEET INDEX28.A.18Packet Pg. 725Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, HORIZ. SCALE (FULL):DATECHECKEDDRAWNRGE:TWP:SEC:DATE:TITLE:CLIENT:PROJECT:OFPROJECT NO.:SHEET NUMBER:REVISIONREV #HORIZ. SCALE (HALF):DESIGNED:DRAWN:VERT. SCALE (FULL):VERT. SCALE (HALF):FILE NAME:FLORIDA LICENSE NO.VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD.£COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS15 19190062.00.002019-08-151" = 40'1" = 80'10/11 48 25KMWJSHN/AN/A15 1900620000W PP1165023KEISH M. WESTBROOK, P.E.VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD STA 136+00-146+00Feet040806610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200Naples, Florida 34109(239) 597-0575 FAX: (239) 597-0578www.consult-rwa.comFlorida Certificates of AuthorizationEB 7663 LB6952PLANS AND PROFILE SHEET INDEX28.A.18Packet Pg. 726Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, HORIZ. SCALE (FULL):DATECHECKEDDRAWNRGE:TWP:SEC:DATE:TITLE:CLIENT:PROJECT:OFPROJECT NO.:SHEET NUMBER:REVISIONREV #HORIZ. SCALE (HALF):DESIGNED:DRAWN:VERT. SCALE (FULL):VERT. SCALE (HALF):FILE NAME:FLORIDA LICENSE NO.VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD.£COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS16 19190062.00.002019-08-151" = 40'1" = 80'10/11 48 25KMWJSHN/AN/A16 1900620000W PP1265023KEISH M. WESTBROOK, P.E.VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD STA 146+00-158+89Feet040806610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200Naples, Florida 34109(239) 597-0575 FAX: (239) 597-0578www.consult-rwa.comFlorida Certificates of AuthorizationEB 7663 LB6952PLANS AND PROFILE SHEET INDEX28.A.18Packet Pg. 727Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, HORIZ. SCALE (FULL):DATECHECKEDDRAWNRGE:TWP:SEC:DATE:TITLE:CLIENT:PROJECT:OFPROJECT NO.:SHEET NUMBER:REVISIONREV #HORIZ. SCALE (HALF):DESIGNED:DRAWN:VERT. SCALE (FULL):VERT. SCALE (HALF):FILE NAME:FLORIDA LICENSE NO.VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD.COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS17 18190062.00.002019-08-151" = 40'1" = 80'10/11 48 25KMWJHN/AN/A17 - INTERSECTION PLAN 0165023KEISH M. WESTBROOK, P.E.PRELIMINARY INTERSECTION PLAN OLD US 41Feet040806610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200Naples, Florida 34109(239) 597-0575 FAX: (239) 597-0578www.consult-rwa.comFlorida Certificates of AuthorizationEB 7663 LB6952NOTE:EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS INOLD 41 SHOWN PER PLAN.NO SURVEY DATA OBTAINED28.A.18Packet Pg. 728Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, HORIZ. SCALE (FULL):DATECHECKEDDRAWNRGE:TWP:SEC:DATE:TITLE:CLIENT:PROJECT:OFPROJECT NO.:SHEET NUMBER:REVISIONREV #HORIZ. SCALE (HALF):DESIGNED:DRAWN:VERT. SCALE (FULL):VERT. SCALE (HALF):FILE NAME:FLORIDA LICENSE NO.VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD.£COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS18 18190062.00.002019-08-151" = 40'1" = 80'10/11 48 25KMWJHN/AN/A18 - INTERSECTION PLAN 0265023KEISH M. WESTBROOK, P.E.PRELIMINARY INTERSECTION PLAN LIVINGSTON RD.Feet040806610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200Naples, Florida 34109(239) 597-0575 FAX: (239) 597-0578www.consult-rwa.comFlorida Certificates of AuthorizationEB 7663 LB6952NOTE:EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS INLIVINGSTON RD. SHOWN PER PLAN.NO SURVEY DATA OBTAINED28.A.18Packet Pg. 729Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, HORIZ. SCALE (FULL):DATECHECKEDDRAWNRGE:TWP:SEC:DATE:TITLE:CLIENT:PROJECT:OFPROJECT NO.:SHEET NUMBER:REVISIONREV #HORIZ. SCALE (HALF):DESIGNED:DRAWN:VERT. SCALE (FULL):VERT. SCALE (HALF):FILE NAME:FLORIDA LICENSE NO.VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD.£COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS19 19190062.00.002019-08-151" = 50'1" = 100'10/11 48 25KMWJSHN/AN/A19 1900620000W IP0365023KEISH M. WESTBROOK, P.E.LAKE PLANFeet0501006610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200Naples, Florida 34109(239) 597-0575 FAX: (239) 597-0578www.consult-rwa.comFlorida Certificates of AuthorizationEB 7663 LB695228.A.18Packet Pg. 730Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, WĂŐĞͮϮϳ y,//dϳ /DWZ/>><^ZWhD^dZW>E 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 731 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) P R FUTURE VETERANS MEMORIAL BOULEVARD (50') EXISTING 15' DRAINAGE EASEMENT PB 39, PG 81-82 EXISTING 25' CONSERVATION/ PRESERVE EASEMENT PB 39 PG 81-82 15' WIDE TYPE 'B' LANDSCAPE BUFFER ZONE: I UNDEVELOPED EXISTING 60' ROADWAY EASEMENT OR 238 PG 913 EXISTING 50' DRAINAGE EASEMENT OR 1864 PG 455 P P P PP L L RR R RR R R ZONED: A UNDEVELOPED TRACT "B" CASTLEWOOD AT IMPERIAL PUD PB39 PG 81-82 RESIDENTIAL ZONED: A UNDEVELOPED ZONED: A UNDEVELOPED AA ZONED: GC IMPERIAL GOLF CLUB 10' WIDE TYPE 'A' LANDSCAPE BUFFER PROJECT BOUNDARY 15' WIDE TYPE 'D' LANDSCAPE BUFFER15' WIDE TYPE 'D' LANDSCAPE BUFFER RNO BUFFER REQUIRED 10' WIDE TYPE 'A' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 50' ROADWAY EASEMENT OR 1051 PG 1686 0 500'250' SCALE: 1" = 250' GradyMinor Civil Engineers ●Land Surveyors ●Planners ●Landscape Architects Cert. of Auth. EB 0005151 Cert. of Auth. LB 0005151 Business LC 26000266 Bonita Springs: 239.947.1144 Fort Myers: 239.690.4380 REVISED 06/12/2017 LEGEND # DEVIATION R RESIDENTIAL AA AMENITY AREA L LAKE P PRESERVE 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 732 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) WĂŐĞͮϮϴ y,//dϴ WZKWZdzWWZ/^Zd 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 733 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) / $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,505,000 $ 880,700 $ 3,424,200 $ 0 $ 3,424,200 $ 3,424,200 $ 3,424,200 $ 3,424,200 Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Summary Parcel No 00153160004 SiteAddress*Disclaimer Site City Site Zone*Note Name / Address N A REALTY TRUST INC 3470 CLUB CENTER BLVD 3470 CLUB CENTER BLVD City NAPLES State FL Zip 34114 Map No. Strap No. Section Township Range Acres£ *Estimated 3A15 000100 010 3A15 15 48 25 78.48 Legal 15 48 25 E1/2 OF NE1/4 LESS N50FT 69.97 AC OR 1365 PG 1357 Millage Area 143 Millage Rates £ *Calculations Sub./Condo 100 - ACREAGE HEADER School Other Total Use Code 99 - ACREAGE NOT ZONED AGRICULTURAL 5.083 5.8071 10.8901 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 07/07/88 1365-1357 05/01/88 1347-2018 05/01/85 1136-315 10/01/82 992-207 2019 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value (+) Improved Value (=) Market Value (=) Assessed Value (=) School Taxable Value (=) Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after theFinal Tax Roll 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 734 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) / $ 10,650,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 65,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 6,000,000 $ 0 $ 6,000,000 $ 6,000,000 $ 0 $ 0 Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Summary Parcel No 00152600002 SiteAddress*Disclaimer 14510 OLD41 Site City NAPLES Site Zone*Note 34110 Name / Address COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 City NAPLES State FL Zip 34112 Map No. Strap No. Section Township Range Acres£ *Estimated 3A15 000100 009 13A15 15 48 25 60 Legal 15 48 25 THE N 2030 FT OF THE W1/2 OF THE NE1/4 LYING W OF THE ACLRAILRAOD R/W LESS THE N 50FT THEREOF AND 15 48 25 THE N 2337 FT OF THEW1/2 OF THE NE1/4 LYING E OF ACL RAILRAOD R/W LESS THE E 30FT OF THE N780FT AND LESS THE N 50FT THEREOF. Millage Area 143 Millage Rates £ *Calculations Sub./Condo 100 - ACREAGE HEADER School Other Total Use Code 86 - COUNTIES INCLUDING NON-MUNICIPAL GOV.5.083 5.8071 10.8901 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 06/22/07 4248-1732 09/16/04 3644-652 01/15/02 2963-3018 12/29/95 2133-1899 04/01/94 1933-811 08/01/92 1747-2163 07/01/74 597-1026 2019 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value (+) Improved Value (=) Market Value (=) Assessed Value (=) School Taxable Value (=) Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after theFinal Tax Roll 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 735 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) / $ 22,000,000 $ 12,000,000 $ 100 $ 2,061,000 $ 1,600,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 8,040,000 $ 17,235,227 $ 25,275,227 $ 287,631 $ 24,987,596 $ 25,275,227 $ 24,987,596 Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Summary Parcel No 00145280002 SiteAddress*Disclaimer 1130TURTLECREEKBLVD Site City NAPLES Site Zone*Note 34110 Name / Address MEADOW BROOK PRESERVE LLC % ATLAS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS 226 FIFTH AVENUE 3RD FLR City NEW YORK State NY Zip 10010 Map No. Strap No. Section Township Range Acres£ *Estimated 3A10 000100 041 3A10 10 48 25 36.27 Legal 10 48 25 BEG AT SW CNR OF SEC 10 N 3DEG W 1318.46FT, N89DEG E 1753.41FT,S31DEG W 1005.23 FT, N90DEG W 559.65FT, S11DEG E 21.33FT, S02DEG E134.53FT, S 20DEG W 138.74FT, S03 DEG W 44FT, S89DEG E 398.24FT, S 31 DEGW 152.07FT, N 89 DEG W 878.25FT TO POB Millage Area 143 Millage Rates £ *Calculations Sub./Condo 100 - ACREAGE HEADER School Other Total Use Code 3 - MULTI-FAMILY 10 UNITS OR MORE 5.083 5.8071 10.8901 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 08/16/12 4829-2543 10/13/10 4614-3268 04/26/10 4564-1574 04/04/96 2167-51 10/01/86 1221-981 10/01/83 1046-1068 09/01/80 882-358 2019 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value (+) Improved Value (=) Market Value (-) 10% Cap (=) Assessed Value (=) School Taxable Value (=) Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after theFinal Tax Roll 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 736 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) / $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 3,400,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 549,600 $ 97,400 $ 3,481,670 $ 4,935,671 $ 8,417,341 $ 8,417,341 $ 8,417,341 $ 8,417,341 Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Summary Parcel No 00152240006 SiteAddress*Disclaimer 14250TAMIAMITRL N Site City NAPLES Site Zone*Note 34110 Name / Address TRI I ASSOC LLC 7878 COOPER CREEK BLVD City UNIVERSITY PARK State FL Zip 34201 Map No. Strap No. Section Township Range Acres£ *Estimated 3A15 000100 002 3A15 15 48 25 18.86 Legal 15 48 25 NW1/4 OF NW1/4 LYING W OF US-41, AND SEC 16 48 25 N1/2 OFNE1/4, LESS N268.54FT, LESS PORTION WEST OF US 41 AND US 41 R/W, LESSTHAT PORTION OF SECS 15 & 16 IN TWP 48 RNG 25 AS DESC IN OR 4611 PG2633 Millage Area 143 Millage Rates £ *Calculations Sub./Condo 100 - ACREAGE HEADER School Other Total Use Code 16 - COMMUNITY SHOPPING CENTERS 5.083 5.8071 10.8901 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 10/18/12 4865-2395 02/05/10 4606-1194 04/28/08 4468-297 04/14/08 4468-295 04/28/08 4468-293 04/11/08 4468-291 04/11/09 4468-289 04/11/09 4468-287 04/11/09 4468-285 03/20/00 2653-738 07/29/84 1093-2018 06/01/84 1086-1821 07/01/81 928-1221 02/01/71 386-755 2019 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value (+) Improved Value (=) Market Value (=) Assessed Value (=) School Taxable Value (=) Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after theFinal Tax Roll 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 737 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) / $ 0 $ 2,108,304 $ 0 $ 2,108,304 $ 941,119 $ 1,167,185 $ 2,108,304 $ 1,167,185 Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Summary Parcel No 00154600000 SiteAddress*Disclaimer Site City Site Zone*Note Name / Address A L DOUGHERTY CO INC C/O DOUGHERTY GROUP 1385 WARREN AVE STE B City DOWNERS GROVE State IL Zip 60515-3466 Map No. Strap No. Section Township Range Acres£ *Estimated 3A16 000100 001 3A16 16 48 25 2.42 Legal 16 48 25 N 268.54FT OF NE1/4 LYING ELY OF US 41 LESS RW Millage Area 143 Millage Rates £ *Calculations Sub./Condo 100 - ACREAGE HEADER School Other Total Use Code 10 - VACANT COMMERCIAL 5.083 5.8071 10.8901 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 01/12/75 610-1174 2019 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value (+) Improved Value (=) Market Value (-) 10% Cap (=) Assessed Value (=) School Taxable Value (=) Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after theFinal Tax Roll 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 738 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) WĂŐĞͮϮϵ y,//dϵ ,zZK>K'/Z/E&>>d 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 739 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) TITLE: CLIENT: PROJECT FILE NUMBER:NUMBER: COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF &200,66,21(56 VETERANS MEMORIAL BOULEVARD ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS EXHIBIT XX - RAINFALL DATA6610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200 / Naples, Florida 34109 (239) 597-0575 FAX: (239) 597-0578 www.consult-rwa.com Florida Certificates of Authorization EB 7663 / LB6952 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 740 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) WĂŐĞͮϯϬ y,//dϭϬ KE/E'DWy,//d 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 741 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF &200,66,21(56TITLE:CLIENT:PROJECT:PROJECT NO.:6610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200Naples, Florida 34109(239) 597-0575 FAX: (239) 597-0578www.consult-rwa.comFlorida Certificates of AuthorizationEB 7663 LB 6952FILE NAME:190062.00.00VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD.190062.00.00Zoning Map ExhibitEXHIBIT 10 - ZONING MAPPOND 4 PARCELPOND 5 PARCELPOND 2 PARCELPOND 1 PARCELPOND 3 PARCEL28.A.18Packet Pg. 742Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, WĂŐĞͮϯϭ y,//dϭϭ >Eh^y,//d 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 743 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) TITLE: CLIENT: PROJECT FILE NUMBER:NUMBER: COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF &200,66,21(56 VETERANS MEMORIAL BOULEVARD ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS EXHIBIT XX - LAND USE DESIGNATIONS6610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200 / Naples, Florida 34109 (239) 597-0575 FAX: (239) 597-0578 www.consult-rwa.com Florida Certificates of Authorization EB 7663 / LB6952 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 744 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) WĂŐĞͮϯϮ y,//dϭϮ &ĞĚĞƌĂůŵĞƌŐĞŶĐǇDĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚŐĞŶĐǇ;&DͿ&ůŽŽĚ /ŶƐƵƌĂŶĐĞZĂƚĞDĂƉƐ;&/ZDͿ 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 745 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) 28.A.18Packet Pg. 746Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 1234528.A.18Packet Pg. 747Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, WĂŐĞͮϯϯ y,//dϭϯ &>KKW>/EKDWE^d/KE>h>d/KE^ 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 748 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Project Proj. #: Calculated By:SCB Date: 24-Oct-19 Checked By:KMW Date:24-Oct-19 A. PRE DEVELOPMENT 1. Site Pre-Development 100-year 3-day Storm Runoff Volume Calculation Assumptions: The 100 year 3 day rainfall amount is equal to:15 inches See SFWMD ERP Information Manual Development area (Only disturbed project area):38.48 acres Vol II, Appendix A-18 Curve Number (CN) =80 Avg Existing Ground Elev (Topo) =10.00 NAVD Storage Capacity of soil (S)=1000 Control Elevation =10.5 NAVD CN (S) =2.50 Calculate the total runoff (Q) in inches resulting from the rainfall (P) (Q) =(P-0.2S)2 (P+0.8S) (Q) =12.37 inches Calculate the total runoff volume produced Total Runoff Volume ==39.66 ac-ft 2. Site Pre-Development Storage Available to the basin during the 100-yr flood The amount of runoff volume that can be stored on site was calculated: From Avg Exist Ground Elev=10.00 NAVD Based on Topographic Data To Floodplain Elevation =11.5 NAVD Average per FIRM Map Number:12021C0192H May 16, 2012 Volume between existing ground elevation or control elevation, whichever is higher and the 100 year floodplain elevation Avg Existing Ground Elevation Volume =62,081 c.y.=38.48 ac-ft 3. Difference between items A1 & A2 above (Site Predevelopment Total Runoff Volume) - ( Site Predevelopment Storage Volume Provided) Difference =39.66 -38.48 =1.18 ac-ft B. Exporter or Importer - CN number is based on soil storage in SFWMD Information Manual Design Aids Appendix F-1 for Coastal Uncompressed as a function of depth to water table The site is considered an EXPORTER (Positive A3)Keisha Westbrook, P.E. #65023 -10 - The Collier County FEMA flood insurance study last completed in 2012, was used to establish flood elevations for the 2012 FIRM Maps. According to the study, LIDAR topographic data was utilized to establish existing ground elevations for modeling purposes. Development Area x Q Veterans Memorial BLVD 190062.00.00 Veterans Memorial Boulevard Floodplain Compensation Importer/Exporter Calculations See SFWMD ERP Information Manual - Design Aids V-1 to 7 State of Florida Business Certificate No. EB-0007663 RWA, Inc. 6610 Willow Park Drive, Ste 200 Naples, Florida 34109 Phone: (239) 597-0575 Fax: (239) 597-0578 10/24/2019 K:\2019\190062.00.00 Veterans Memorial Boulevard\014 Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) Application\Calculations\Water Management\Working Docs\2019-08-22 FloodPlain Importer Exporter 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 749 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) WĂŐĞͮϯϰ y,//dϭϰ >/^d^W/^^hZszE td>E^^^^^DEd 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 750 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD EXTENSION: EXISTING VEGETATION ASSOCIATIONS (FLUCFCS) AND LISTED SPECIES SURVEY October 2019 Prepared By: 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 751 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) 1. INTRODUCTION Collier County (applicant) seeks to extend the existing Veterans Memorial Blvd. roadway from its current terminus approximately 1.75 miles to Old US 41. Due to timing and ROW acquisition issues, the project is being undertaken in two phases. The first phase includes expanding the roadway from 2 lanes to 4 lanes from Livingston Road to the current terminus and extending the road an additional 0.85 mile to accommodate a new high school project. The second phase of the project will include extension from the high school site, across the railroad ROW, and through to Old US 41. This report is for the first phase of the project which is currently under design and which will be submitted for permitting shortly. The project area associate with this report includes approximately 11.77 acres of existing road and Right-of-Way (ROW) and 23.59 acres of acres of undeveloped land contained within the County’s ROW. The roadway will provide access to two schools, a golf course maintenance area and an existing residential development. The project is located 1 mile south of the Collier and Lee county boundary, between Livingston Road and Old US 41. Driving directions to the project site would start from Exit 111 from Interstate 75. Head west on Immokalee Road (CR846) to the Livingston Road intersection. Turn north on Livingston Road and travel approximately 2.25 miles to the project intersection on the west side of the road. The Project area is currently a mix of active roadway and undeveloped land (Figure 2). This first phase of the project impacts three small wetland areas. Because of the isolated nature of these three areas, they are not jurisdictional to the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and therefore this first phase of the roadway will not require USACE permitting. The listed species survey information will be provided to the US Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) through their technical assistance coordination process to ensure that no listed species will be impacted as a result of the project. This report documents the results of FLUCFCS mapping efforts. It further documents the results of the listed species/wildlife surveys conducted by Turrell, Hall and Associates (THA). In reviewing this report, the reader should refer to the various Figures (drawings) contained at the end of the report. The referenced figures include: x Figure 1 - Location Map. x Figure 2 - Existing FLUCFCS and Wetlands. x Figure 3 – Gopher Tortoise Burrows Map x Figure 4 – Cavity Tree Location Map. x Figure 5 – Soils Map. 2. EXISTING VEGETATION ASSOCIATIONS, LAND FORMS, & LAND USES (FLUCFCS) 2.1 METHODOLOGY Vegetation associations, land forms, and land uses (FLUCFCS categories) present on and near the project lands were mapped using direct field observations and interpretation of aerial photographs. Field observations were conducted primarily during the period from July 2019 through October 2019. These observations included pedestrian transects across the lands recording vegetation community characteristics as well as recording location points along the boundaries of certain communities/land forms using handheld GPS units. 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 752 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) The methods and class descriptions found in the Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS) manual (FDOT, 1999) were generally followed when delineating areas and assigning areas to an appropriate FLUCFCS category (class) or “code”. Level III classifications were generally employed. Certain modifications and/or additions were made to the FLUCFCS class definitions and numeric codes presented in this manual in order to better describe and differentiate both plant communities and land uses. Since an emphasis was placed on plant communities and the type and quality of habitats formed by these communities, the vegetation association present was given more weight than the prevailing land use in some cases. The sections that follow list and describe the FLUCFCS categories mapped within the project lands and in other adjacent lands. Major FLUCFCS categories are presented first. The FLUCFCS code number for each category is indicated followed by the brief name (description) of the category. If applicable, plants common to each significant vegetation stratum present are indicated. A general description of the FLUCFCS category is then provided together with any nuances specific to the project site that are worthy of mention. Following the major categories, FLUCFCS category modifiers may also be included. For example, the major FLUCFCS category of 621 (cypress forest) might be modified by using the suffix codes “D” and “E2”. In this example, a FLUCFCS code shown as 621 D, E2 would indicate a cypress forest which has been disturbed (the “D” modifier) and has exotic plants present which form a cover ranging from 25 to 49 percent (the “E2” modifier). Modifiers are used when the effects of disturbance or exotic species have significantly altered common characteristics of a major FLUCFCS class. One should note that the standard FLUCFCS system labels certain groups of vegetation associations (FLUCFCS categories) as “uplands” and others as “wetlands”. In assigning FLUCFCS categories, THA uses the FLUCFCS category which best describes the dominant vegetation association, generally without regard to whether the FLUCFCS system considers the community as an “upland” or “wetland”. 2.2 MAJOR FLUCFCS CATEGORIES Figure 2 illustrates detailed FLUCFCS map polygons present on the project lands. A FLUCFCS map unit is a unique area (or polygon) mapped using either a major FLUCFCS category code only (ex., FLUCFCS 621) or a major FLUCFCS category code together with one or more modifiers (ex., FLUCFCS 621 E2). Table 1 lists each of the FLUCFCS map unit codes present on the property and total acreage encompassed by each unique FLUCFCS type. Of the total 35.36 acres contained within the project boundary, 97% classify as uplands (34.3 ac.) and 3% classify as wetlands (1.1 ac). The majority of the project area consists of undeveloped forested land. There are no rare or exceptional vegetation associations present on any of the project lands. The following sub-sections describe each major FLUCFCS category mapped on the project lands. Modifiers attached to these categories are included in the description for the overall category. One should read both the major FLUCFCS categories and their modifiers to understand the FLUCFCS map units present. 411: Pine Flatwoods Canopy - generally greater than 80% cover. Subcanopy – Dense in areas with coverages ranging between 20% and 80% Ground Cover –scarce and sparse, but can include widely scattered various graminoids, forbs, woody species, and ferns. 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 753 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Comments: Areas mapped as FLUCFCS 411 are mesic pine forests with varying degrees of exotic infestation. Brazilian pepper, melaleuca, and earleaf acacia are all present in varying degrees. Areas infested between 10 and 25% are identified with the E1 modifier and areas infested between 25% and 50 % are identified with the E2 modifier. 411 – Pine Flatwoods, 21.66 acres Slash pine Pinus elliottii C & M Dominant Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto C, M & G Dominant Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolia C, M & G Occasional Melaleuca Melaleuca quinquinervia C, M & G Occasional Sand live oak Quercus geminate C Occasional Earleaf acacia Acacia auriculiformis C Occasional Myrsine Myrsine guianensis M & G Common Wax myrtle Myrica cerifera M & G Occasional Caesar weed Urena lobate G Occasional Wire grass Aristida stricta G Common Broom grass Andropogon virginicus G Common Saw palmetto Serenoa repens G Occasional Greenbriar Smilax spp. V Occasional Grapevine Vitis rotundifolia V Occasional 416: Scrubby Pine Flatwoods Canopy - generally less than 50% cover. Subcanopy – Relatively open with coverages ranging between 10% and 60% Ground Cover – very dense in areas with saw palmetto a major component. Comments: Areas mapped as FLUCFCS 416 are more xeric pine forests with varying degrees of exotic infestation mostly Brazilian pepper and earleaf acacia in minor degrees. 416 –Scrubby Pine Flatwood, 0.71 acre Slash pine Pinus elliottii C & M Dominant Saw palmetto Serenoa repens G Dominant Tarflower Bejaria racemosa G Occasional Florida rosemary Ceratiola ericoides G Common Gallberry Ilex glabra G Occasional Rusty lyonia Lyonia fruticose G Occasional Scrub oak Quercus inopina G Occasional Pennyroyal Piloblephis rigida G Occasional 617: Mixed Wetland Hardwoods Canopy – approximately 75% to 80% cover. Subcanopy – fairly open with scattered exotics Ground Cover – dense with ground ferns Comments: Areas mapped as FLUCFCS 617 are essentially a hydric oak community with a dense fern 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 754 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) understory. 617 – Mixed Wetland Hardwoods – 0.31 acre Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia C & M Dominant Melaleuca Melaleuca quiquinervia C & M Occasional Swamp Bay Persea palustris C & M Occasional Sabal Palm Sabal palmetto C & M Occasional Brazilian Pepper Schinus terebinthifolia M Common Myrsine Myrsine guianensis M Common Southern Shield Fern Thelypteris kunthii G Common Swamp Fern Blechnum serrulatum G Common 621: Cypress Forest Canopy – approximately 60% to 80% cover. Subcanopy – Generally sparse, less than 40% coverage Ground Cover – very limited Comments: These areas are dominated by cypress and Brazilian pepper. The subcanopy is relatively open with scattered Brazilian pepper, coastal willow, and cabbage palm. 621 – Cypress – 0.32 acre Cypress Taxodium distichum C & M Dominant Melaleuca Melaleuca quiquinervia C, M & G Common Carolina Willow Salix caroliniana M & G Common Sabal Palm Sabal palmetto C & M Occasional Brazilian Pepper Schinus terebinthifolia M Common Swamp fern Blechnum serrulatum G Common 624: Cypress – Pine – Cabbage Palm Flatwoods Canopy - generally greater than 80% cover. Subcanopy – Dense in areas with coverages ranging between 20% and 80% Ground Cover –scarce and sparse, but can include widely scattered various graminoids, forbs, woody species, and ferns. Comments: Areas mapped as FLUCFCS 624 are hydric pine forests with co-dominant cypress and palm components as well as varying degrees of exotic infestation. Brazilian pepper and melaleuca are also present in varying degrees. Areas infested between 10 and 25% are identified with the E1 modifier and areas infested between 25% and 50 % are identified with the E2 modifier. 624 – Cypress-Pine-Cabbage Palm – 0.44 acre Cypress Taxodium distichum C, M, & G Dominant Slash Pine Pinus elliottii C & M Occasional Melaleuca Melaleuca quinquenervia C, M & G Common Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto C & M Common Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolia M & G Common Myrsine Myrsine guianensis M Common 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 755 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Swamp fern Blechnum serrulatum G Dominant Sawgrass Cladium jamaicense G Occasional Southern Shield Fern Thelypteris kunthii G Common 814: Trails and roadways Canopy – none. Subcanopy - none. Ground Cover - barren areas mixed with areas dominated by various graminoids and ruderals such as bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum), bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon), bluestems (Andropogon spp.), panicums (Panicum spp.), dog-fennel (Eupatorium spp.), beggar-ticks (Bidens spp.), etc. Comments: Lands mapped FLUCFCS 814 are areas that have been used for vehicular passage. Both paved and dirt roads are present in the project area. 2.3 FLUCFCS CATEGORY MODIFIERS (FLUCFCS SUFFIXES) Exotic Plant Invasion (FLUCFCS Modifiers E1, E2, E3, & E4) An “E” modifier following a FLUCFCS category indicates the area has been invaded by a significant number of exotic (e.g., non-native) invasive plants. Four levels of exotic plant infestation are employed in mapping; E1, E2, E3, and E4. The levels are assigned based on the total percent cover accounted for by the exotic species. When dealing with exotic trees such as melaleuca and Australian pine, any tree having a diameter at breast height (DBH) of 1 inch or greater is counted in the percent cover estimate while trees smaller than this are excluded. This typically accounts for trees in the canopy and/or subcanopy strata but excludes most saplings in the ground cover stratum. When dealing with exotic “shrubs” such as Brazilian pepper and downy rose myrtle, any plant over about 4.5 feet in height is counted in the percent cover estimates while others are excluded. This typically accounts for shrubs in the subcanopy strata but excludes many young plants in the ground cover stratum. If the invaded plant community has no native canopy and subcanopy strata (less than 10% cover in either strata), then all exotic trees, shrubs, and groundcover species are counted in the percent cover estimates. When an “E” modifier is attached to a particular FLUCFCS category, the reader should assume that the normal description of the vegetation association (FLUCFCS category) is changed in accordance with the general guidelines provided below for the four “E” levels. x E1 - 10 to 24 percent cover by exotic species. Exotics have little effect on the characteristics of the native plant community unless the area is naturally without canopy and subcanopy strata. x E2 - 25 to 49 percent cover by exotic species. In forested or shrub dominated systems, exotics may be co-dominant species in subcanopy or canopy. A slight to significant reduction in native ground cover can result from exotics along with a possible reduction in the number of native subcanopy species. In other systems, exotics are dominant species and number and diversity of native plants are reduced. x E3 - 50 to 75 percent cover by exotic species. In forested or shrub dominated systems, exotics are often dominant in the subcanopy and 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 756 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) can be the dominant or co-dominant species in the canopy. The native ground cover is significantly reduced, and exotics may be the dominant species. Species diversity and numbers are significantly reduced in the subcanopy and, to a lesser degree, in the canopy. Growth of native woody species is reduced. In other systems, exotics are the dominant species and the number and diversity of native plants are severely reduced. x E4 - >75 percent cover by exotic species. In forested or shrub dominated systems, exotics are typically dominant in the subcanopy and, in the case of exotic trees, are the dominant or co-dominant species in the canopy. Ground cover is highly restricted. The population of native species in the subcanopy is drastically reduced and diversity is lowered. The population of native species in the canopy is also severely restricted and diversity may be reduced. Exotics are often the dominant ground cover species. Species richness and diversity in the ground cover stratum are greatly diminished. In other systems, exotics are the dominant species and would typically be classified as a monoculture of the exotic species involved. x Exotic Monocultures - Once exotic species completely dominate the area, such an area is given a FLUCFCS designation appropriate to the dominant exotic rather than using the FLUCFCS code for the native vegetation association replaced by the exotic together with an “E” modifier. Examples of such exotic “monocultures” are FLUCFCS 422 (Brazilian pepper) and 424 (Melaleuca). Areas are mapped using an exotic monoculture FLUCFCS code where there is less than a 15 percent cover by native species in the canopy or upper-most stratum and where the percent cover by exotic species exceeds approximately 85 percent. One should note that the standard FLUCFCS system states that once a particular species accounts for 66 percent or more of the dominant stratum’s cover, the area should be classified in accordance with this dominant species. Thus, using the standard system, some areas mapped with an E3 modifier and most areas mapped with an E4 modifier would be classified according to the dominant exotic rather than the remnant native community. On the project lands E1 and E2 modifiers were typically used to map invasion primarily by Brazilian pepper, and to a lesser extent, melaleuca and earleaf acacia. Hydric Areas (FLUCFCS Modifier “H”) In certain instances, the most appropriate major FLUCFCS code to assign to an area may be a code that generally implies the area is an upland or otherwise does not seem to indicate the area may be a wetland. There are cases where the particular area may indeed classify as a wetland, however. When this occurs and there is no proper existing wetland FLUCFCS code available, the best fitting FLUCFCS code is assigned but is also given a suffix of "H" indicating hydric conditions are present and the area likely classifies as a wetland. For example, there can be actively managed areas within larger fallow fields (FLUCFCS 216) that are depressions. Some of these depressions can have wetland characteristics and may have several wetland plant species present. Such depressions would be mapped as FLUCFCS 216 H indicating these areas are part of a fallow field but have hydric characteristics. There are no habitats on the project lands with an H qualifier. 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 757 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) 3. LISTED SPECIES SURVEYS Wildlife and listed species surveys were conducted by THA on the project lands. As used herein, the term "listed animal species" refers to those animals listed as endangered or threatened by the US Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) or the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) as well as those animal species listed as species of special concern by the FWC. The term "listed plant species" refers to those plants listed as endangered or threatened by the FWS. Several animal species listed by FWC are also classified (listed) by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) as wetland dependent species. THA’s wildlife/listed species surveys were supplemented by research concerning listed species. The following subsections document these efforts and the results of these efforts. 3.1 DATABASE RESEARCH Prior to field investigations, aerial photos, soils maps, and prior mapping for the Estancia property were reviewed to identify the various vegetation associations potentially present on and adjacent to project lands. Various publications and databases were reviewed to determine listed plant and wildlife species which could occur and those that had been previously documented on or near the project lands as well as to gather information concerning listed species (see listed references in Section 4). Based on the habitat types identified, existing knowledge of the project area, contacts with other consultants, and review of publications and databases, a preliminary list of listed plant and animal species with the potential to occur within or near the project lands was determined. 3.2 FIELD BIOTIC SURVEY METHODOLOGY Biotic and listed species surveys for the proposed project were conducted by THA in from July through October 2019. Table 4 provides the specific dates and times of these surveys, the total number of man- hours spent surveying on a given date, and the ecologists who conducted the surveys on a given date. Surveys were conducted such that observations included time periods ranging from sunrise to sunset. Barring seasonal considerations, the survey dates allowed for observations during likely times of probable occurrence for the majority of the listed animal species which could occur on or immediately adjacent to the project lands. The field surveys consisted of ecologists walking relatively straight and meandering transects through the various habitats found on the project lands. Space between transects usually varied, depending on type of habitat, visibility limits, and density of vegetation. Observers were equipped with compass, aerials, wildlife and plant identification books and notes, binoculars, field notebooks, and hand- held GPS units. Along the transects, the biologists periodically stopped, looked for wildlife and signs of wildlife, looked for listed plant species in appropriate habitats, and listened for wildlife vocalizations. The approximate location of observed listed wildlife and plant species and their numbers were mapped on aerials and recorded in field notebooks on a daily basis as were signs of listed wildlife species that were noted. In the same fashion, observed non-listed wildlife species encountered or signs of such species were recorded daily. When performing pedestrian transects through appropriate habitats, particular consideration was given to looking for signs of gopher tortoises, Big Cypress fox squirrels, and potential Florida bonneted bat roosts. Potentially suitable gopher tortoise habitats were surveyed for gopher tortoise tracks, scat, burrows, and individuals while potentially suitable forested habitats were examined for cavities and squirrel day beds. These efforts included examining habitats immediately adjacent to the project lands. 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 758 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) The field survey methodologies utilized on the project lands were generally consistent with those prescribed by the FWC (GFC, 1988). The following provides a discussion of how the methodologies employed deviated from the specific subcategories of wildlife survey methods recommended in the referenced FWC (formerly GFC) document. "Wetland Surveys" Methods used were consistent except for: (1) most wetland areas received greater than five days of surveying; (2) Surveys addressed more species than those listed in the 1988 GFC publication. "Upland Surveys" Methods used were consistent except for: (1) the density of transects surveyed exceeded the recommended density; (2) Surveys addressed more species than those listed in the 1988 GFC publication. "Small Mammal Sampling" No small mammal trapping was performed. None of the species listed under this methodology could be reasonably expected to occur on the project lands due to inappropriate habitat and/or the range of the species not extending into the project area. "Herpetofaunal Surveys" Methods used were consistent except the funnel trapping recommended was not conducted. Only two of the species listed, indigo snake and gopher frog, could reasonably be expected to occur on the project lands. It is possible that indigo snakes exist but were not encountered during pedestrian transect surveys due to their elusive nature. Gopher frogs could theoretically exist in limited areas; however this is extremely unlikely. "Gopher Tortoise Burrow Surveys" Methods used were consistent except for: (1) surveys included covering habitat types not listed in the GFC publication; (2) survey transects occupied a higher density of transects than is recommended plus covered a higher percentage of potentially suitable habitats than is recommended; (3) survey transects included habitat types not normally considered appropriate for gopher tortoises. The surveys were performed by the following THA personnel: Tim Hall Education: B.S. in Forest Resources and Conservation, M.S. in Wildlife Ecology. Experience: 30 years as an environmental consultant with emphasis on listed species surveys and management plans, environmental impact analyses and assessments, wetland delineation, environmental permitting, and various other environmental topics. Arielle Poulos Education: B.A. in Biology and Environmental Studies. Experience: 9 years as a biologist employed by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection and 5 years of professional environmental consulting and ecological studies experience in Florida including performing wetland delineations, listed species/wildlife surveys, marine studies and surveys, habitat mapping, and environmental permitting. Nick Pearson Education: B.S. in Marine Science. Experience: 4 years as a professional environmental consultant and ecologist with emphasis on ecological assessments, wildlife surveys, environmental permitting, habitat restoration plans, environmental assessments and impact 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 759 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) statements. 3.3 RESULTS 3.3.1 Research Results The review conducted of the various existing databases concerning documented listed species (FWC, FWS, FNAI) did not reveal records of any listed plant species documented on the project lands. Conversations with FWC personnel indicated that black bears were suspected of crossing the property for transient passage, though this use has decreased with all of the development that has occurred in the area. THA's review of these existing databases included searching records for documented listed species occurring within approximately 5,000 feet of the subject property boundary. Other listed animal species previously documented outside the project lands but within 5,000 feet of the project site included gopher tortoise, little blue heron, tricolored heron, and bald eagle. There were no records of any listed plant species occurring in the query area. 3.3.2 Listed Animal Species Observed Several different animal species, including four protected species, were observed during the course of THA's wildlife/listed species surveys. Table 3 provides a listing of all the wildlife (animal) species observed on the project site during the course of THA’s surveys. Surveys specific to the bonneted bat resulted in no observations of roosting activities though 14 cavity trees were documented on the project lands. These trees will need follow-up observations prior to clearing the property to ensure that no bonneted bats have taken up residence prior to construction. Surveys specific to gopher tortoises resulted in location of 2 tortoise burrows located on the project lands. Permits from the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) will be required to relocate the tortoises prior to construction on the project site. The following subsections briefly address the listed animal species observed on-site or immediately adjacent (i.e. within the ROW boundary). Snowy Egret Snowy egrets (Egretta thula) were observed foraging along the drainage swale to the south of the ROW. No snowy egret nests or signs of nesting were observed on-site or in the adjacent areas. White Ibis Several white ibis (Eudocimus albus) were observed on different occasions foraging within the open trails and grassed areas on the north and south sides of the ROW. White ibis were also observed perching in cypress trees immediately to the west of the Phase 1 project boundary. No white ibis nests or signs of nesting were observed on-site or in adjacent areas. Little Blue Heron Little blue herons (Egretta caerulea) were also documented foraging along the shorelines of the southern drainage swale. No heron nests or signs of nesting were observed on-site or in adjacent areas. Wood Stork A single wood stork (Mycteria americana) was observed within the drainage swale to the south of the ROW. No wood stork nests or signs of nesting were observed on-site or in adjacent areas. 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 760 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Bald Eagle A bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) was observed flying over the project site on two separate occasions during the survey time-frame. No evidence of any foraging or nesting was documented within or immediately adjacent to the ROW. A known eagle nest is located approximately 2,000 feet southwest of the western project boundary. Active nesting has also been documented in the past approximately 1.5 miles southwest of the project site (CO001) and approximately 0.5 mile south of the project site (CO047). Gopher Tortoise Gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) burrows were observed predominately in the scrubby habitat in the western portion of the Phase 1 project area. Two active burrows were located and flagged within the ROW boundary. Additional burrows are located in the Phase 2 area but those burrows will be permitted separately for relocation due to the time frames anticipated between the two construction events. 3.3.3 Listed Animal Species Which Have the Potential to Occur but Were Not Observed Although not observed on the project lands during the listed species surveys, additional state and/or federally listed faunal species could potentially occur on the project site or on lands adjacent to the property. Based on habitats present within these areas, land uses, species observed near the project during biotic surveys, habitats present in the general area, review of various sources of information previously, and personal experience of project ecologists, assessments were made as to the probability of occurrence of other listed species on the project lands. Three species of mammals, 1 species of reptile, 1 amphibian species, and 1 species of birds were considered to have some potential for occurring on the roadway property. These species are listed in Table 4. This table provides the state and federal designation status of each species along with a generalized rating as to the probability for each species to occur on project lands. By "occur", it is meant that the species could either utilize project lands for hunting/foraging purposes, traverse/pass through project lands, directly reside on the project lands (unlikely), or use the lands for nests, burrows, or dens as applicable to the species. The following sub-sections address the identified species. Big Cypress Fox Squirrel The Big Cypress fox squirrel (Sciurus niger avicennia) (BCFS) is considered a threatened species by the FWC and is classified as a wetland dependent species by SFWMD. BCFS typically reside in pine flatwoods and mixed pine and cypress forests and prefer mature forests that are open and “park-like” (e.g., have a scattered subcanopy and a ground cover not dominated by woody species or vines). BCFS can also be found in melaleuca infested forests provided some desirable habitat remains in the general area and can also forage areas containing hardwoods such as oaks and cabbage palms. During the course of the listed species/wildlife surveys, no BCFS individuals were observed on-site though it is known that individuals have been observed on the golf course lands both north and south of the ROW. Given this and the presence of suitable habitats, the potential for BCFS residing on the project lands or utilizing the project lands for foraging activities is judged to be high. Florida Black Bear The Florida black bear (Ursus americanus floridanus) was recently delisted from threatened status by the FWC and is classified as a wetland dependent species by SFWMD. Black bears are known to travel great distances to forage and mate. The range of habitat types used and traversed by the 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 761 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Florida black bear is very broad and could theoretically encompass the project lands. Personal conversations with FWC staff revealed several records within 5 miles of the project lands. During the course of THA's biotic surveys, staff did not find any Florida black bears or positive signs of this species’ presence. It is extremely unlikely that any black bears would den on the project lands due to the relatively small size and proximity to adjacent development. Suitability of the majority of the project lands for bear foraging is very low due to the exotic vegetation infestation, thus it is anticipated that chances of bears using the project lands to any significant degree are limited. There is a fair chance that black bears may occasionally roam through portions of the project lands considering the sightings within 5 miles of the project. Florida Bonneted Bat The Florida bonneted bat (Eumops floridanus) was listed as endangered by FWS in December 2013. There is very little information regarding the life history or distribution of the Florida bonneted bat. The majority of roosts are found in non-native habitat or artificial roosts such as bat houses. Typically, the colonies are small consisting of one male and several females. Roosting can occur in tree cavities or in artificial structures such as bat houses or buildings. Foraging typically occurs over native habitats including hardwoods, pinelands and mangrove habitats, but golf courses and neighborhoods may also be utilized. A thorough survey of the project lands was conducted to search for tree cavities or other structure that could be utilized by bonneted bats. A total of 14 cavities were located throughout the project site. These cavities will be peeped with a small camera and monitor system prior to construction to make sure that they are unoccupied prior to being cut down. No other evidence of any bat utilization was observed on the project site. Gopher Frog Gopher frogs (Rana capito), listed as a Species of Special Concern (SSC) by the FWC, are potential commensals with gopher tortoises. Two gopher tortoises were found on within the ROW lands and additional burrows are known to be present on adjacent lands so it is possible that gopher frogs could also be present. Special care will be taken when relocating tortoises to ensure that gopher frogs or other commensals are not harmed during the relocation efforts. Although gopher frogs are highly dependent upon gopher tortoise burrows for shelter, they occasionally also find refuge in other burrows (crayfish, rodent) and features such as stump holes. Such features are also present on the ROW lands, however the on-site wetlands are not highly suitable gopher frog habitats and appropriate nearby wetlands are a necessary component of the frog's life cycle. Eastern Indigo Snake The eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon corais couperi) is listed as threatened by FWS and FWC. Generally, this species lives and hunts in a wide variety of habitats and its territory can cover large areas. They can be associated with gopher tortoise burrows (as a commensal) and favor pine flatwoods, palmetto prairies, and scrub habitats as well as wetland edges. They are relatively reclusive in nature and observations in the wild are rather rare. There would seem to be a moderate probability that one or more eastern indigo snakes may occasionally utilize any number of different habitats present in the project lands. It seems unlikely that such snakes actually reside on the property given the restricted access due to past disturbances and surrounding development. Indigo snakes could theoretically reside on the property; however, chances seem remote. Southeastern American Kestrel American kestrels are represented in south Florida by two subspecies. The year-round resident, the Southeastern American kestrel (Falco sparverius paulus), is listed by FWC as threatened, while the second subspecies, the Eastern American kestrel (F. sparverius sparverius) migrates to Florida 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 762 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) in the winter months and is not listed by the FWC. Kestrels typically forage for insects and lizards in pastures, open fields, and park-like landscapes with a relatively open midstory and canopy and short herbaceous groundcover (Stys, 1993). They typically nest in dead trees in cavities created by other avian species. The nest trees are usually in close proximity to suitable foraging areas. Listed kestrels may infrequently spend time hunting the open fairways of the golf courses around the project site, as well as the open areas along the existing roadway in the eastern half of the project area. Although listed kestrels may forage in such areas on occasion, it is unlikely that any reside on the property. No listed kestrels were seen on or adjacent to the property nor were signs of possible kestrel nests observed. 3.3.4 Listed Animal General Wildlife Observations During the biotic surveys conducted on the project lands, ecologists recorded sightings and signs of non-listed wildlife in addition to listed species. Table 3 contains all wildlife observed on the project lands. Signs of larger mammals, such as white-tailed deer, were observed in portions of the ROW property. Other mammals actually observed during the survey efforts were armadillo, raccoon, and gray squirrels. Observations of non-listed bird species were generally widely scattered and low in number and were particularly infrequent in the interior of the site. Although several species of non-listed birds are indicated in Table 3, the actual number of individuals and number of species observed during any given period of wildlife observations was typically low. A few of the non-migratory bird species may reside on the project lands, however very few nests were observed. 3.3.5 Listed Plant Species According to the FWS, no federally listed plant species have been documented in Collier County (USFWS, 2015). No listed plant species were observed on the project lands during the course of the listed species/wildlife surveys conducted and a review of pertinent databases concerning listed plant species found no records of such plants occurring on project lands or within 5,000 feet of these lands. Considering these points, it seems highly improbable that any plant species currently listed by FWS may be present on project lands. 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 763 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) 4. REFERENCES Chafin, L.G. 2000. Field guide to the rare plants of Florida. Florida Natural Areas Inventory, Tallahassee, Florida. Deyrup, Mark and R. Franz (ed.). 1994. Rare and endangered biota of Florida, Volume IV, invertebrates. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). 1999. Florida land use, cover, and forms classification system. FDOT, Tallahassee, FL. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC). 2013. Florida’s endangered species, threatened species, and species of special concern - official lists. FWC, Tallahassee, Florida. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC). 2014. Florida panther telemetry data, 2/23/1981 through 7/24/2014 – GIS database. FWC, Tallahassee, FL. FWC. 2015. Florida panther mortality data, 2/13/1972 through 12/31/2015 – GIS database. FWC, Tallahassee, FL. FWC. 2015. Florida black bear nuisance report data, 1980 through 2014 – GIS database. FWC, Tallahassee, FL. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC). 2015. Florida's waterbird colony locator. FWC, Tallahassee, FL. Available online: http://atoll.floridamarine.org/WaterBirds/ (Accessed June, 2015) FWC. 2015. FWC eagle nest locator; data for 2000 through 20014. FWC, Tallahassee, FL. Available online: http://myfwc.com/eagle/eaglenests. (Accessed June, 2015) Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission (GFC). 1988. Wildlife methodology guidelines for section 18.D of the Application for Development Approval. GFC, Tallahassee, FL. Florida Natural Areas Inventory (FNAI). 2014. Species and natural communities tracking list for Collier County, Florida. FNAI, Tallahassee, FL. Available online: http://www.fnai.org/trackinglist.cfm (accessed June, 2015) Gilbert, C.R. 1992. Rare and endangered biota of Florida, Volume II, fishes. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. Hipes, D., D.R. Jackson, K. NeSmith, D. Printiss, and K. Brandt. 2000. Field guide to the rare animals of Florida. Florida Natural Areas Inventory, Tallahassee, Florida. Humphrey, Stephen R. (ed.). 1992. Rare and endangered biota of Florida, Volume I, Mammals. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. Kautz, R., R. Kawula, T. Hoctor, J. Comiskey, D. Jansen, D. Jennings, J. Kasbohm, F. Mazzotti, R. McBride, L. Johnson, and K. Root. 2006. How much is enough? Landscape-scale conservation for the Florida panther. Biological Conservation 130, 118-133. 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 764 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Moler, Paul E. (ed.). 1992. Rare and endangered biota of Florida, Volume III, amphibians and reptiles. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. Morrison, Joan L. 2001. Recommended management practices and survey protocols for Audubon’s crested caracara (Caracara cheriway audubonii) in Florida. Technical Report No. 18. FWC, Bureau of Wildlife Diversity Conservation, Tallahassee, FL. Multi-Species/Ecosystem Recovery Implementation Team (MERIT) for South Florida, Florida Panther Subteam. 2002. Landscape conservation strategy for the Florida panther in south Florida. USFWS, Vero Beach, FL. Rodgers, J.A, H.W. Kale, and H.T. Smith (ed.). 1996. Rare and endangered biota of Florida, Volume V, birds. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. Runde, D.E., J.A. Gore, J.A. Hovis, M.S. Robson, and P.D. Southall. 1991. The Florida atlas of breeding sites for herons and their allies. Nongame wildlife program technical report No. 10. Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, Tallahassee, FL. South Florida Water Management District. June, 2005. Basis of review for environmental resource permit applications within the South Florida Water Management District - Table 4.2.7-1: Listed wildlife species that are aquatic or wetland dependent and that use upland habitats for nesting or denning. SFWMD, West Palm Beach, Florida. Stys, Beth. 1993. Ecology and habitat protection needs of the Southeastern American kestrel on large- scale development sites in Florida. Nongame Wildlife Technical Report #13. FWC, Tallahassee, FL. US Fish and Wildlife Service. 1999. South Florida multi-species recovery plan. USFWS, Vero Beach, FL. US Fish and Wildlife Service. 2002. Habitat management guidelines for Audubon’s crested caracara in central and southern Florida. USFWS, Vero Beach, FL. US Fish and Wildlife Service. 2015. Federally listed and candidate species in Collier County, Florida, Vero Beach, FL. Available online: http://www.fws.gov/verobeach/ (Accessed June, 2015). Ward, Daniel B. (ed.). 1991. Rare and endangered biota of Florida, Volume V, plants. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 765 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) APPENDIX 1 Table 1. Existing FLUCFCS categories present on the Veterans Memorial Blvd Extension property. FLUCFCS Code FLUCFCS Description Acres % of Total Property 411 Pine Flatwoods 1.56 4.6 411 E1 Pine Flatwoods 10% – 25% exotics 17.01 49.7 411 E2 Pine Flatwoods 25% – 50% exotics 2.13 6.2 416 Scrubby Pine Flatwoods 0.71 2.1 617 Mixed Wetland Hardwoods 0.31 0.9 621 Cypress 0.32 0.9 624 Cypress / Pine / Palm 0.44 1.3 814 Roads and Trails 11.72 34.3 TOTAL ACRES 34.20 Table 2. Information for the dates listed species/general wildlife surveys were conducted for the proposed Veterans Memorial Blvd Extension property. Survey Date Survey Staff Weather Conditions Survey Time Period Total Survey Man-Hours 07/15/2019 AP, NP Partly cloudy to overcast. Slight Breeze. Low 77° High 95° 0930 – 1830 16 07/17/2019 AP, NP Overcast to light rain. Slight Breeze. Low 76° High 94° 0730 – 1830 22 07/18/2019 AP, NP Fair to Partly cloudy. Slight Breeze. Low 75° High 89° 0730 – 1830 22 08/16/2019 TH Partly Cloudy and Gusty. Low 73° High 85° 1300 – 2000 7 09/17/2019 TH Clear. Slight breeze Low 76° High 90° 0630 – 1200 5.5 10/08/2019 TH Fair to Partly cloudy. Calm Low 80° High 87° 1400 – 1930 5.5 Total Survey Man-Hours 78.0 TH = Tim Hall, AP = Arielle Poulos, NP = Nick Pearson 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 766 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Table 3. Wildlife species observed on or immediately adjacent to the Veterans Memorial Blvd Extension property. COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME STATUS FWC FWS SFWMD REPTILES & AMPHIBIANS Brown anole Anolis sagrei -- -- -- Southern black racer Coluber constrictor priapus -- -- -- Gopher Tortoise Gopherus polyphemus T -- -- Red rat snake Pantherophis guttatus -- -- -- BIRDS Great blue heron* Ardea herodias -- -- -- Cattle egret Bubulcus ibis -- -- -- Red-shouldered hawk Buteo lineatus -- -- -- Northern cardinal Cardinalis cardinalis -- -- -- Turkey vulture* Cathartes aura -- -- -- Black vulture* Coragyps atratus -- -- -- Yellow-rumped warbler Dendroica coronata -- -- -- Pileated woodpecker Dryocopus pileatus -- -- -- Gray catbird Dumetella carolinensis Swallow-tailed kite* Elanoides forficatus -- -- -- White ibis Eudocimus albus SSC -- WDS Little blue heron* Egretta caerulea SSC -- WDS Snowy egret* Egretta thula SSC -- WDS Bald Eagle* Haliaeetus leucocephalus -- -- WDS Loggerhead shrike Lanius ludovicianus -- -- -- Red-bellied woodpecker Melanerpes carolinus -- -- -- Northern mockingbird Mimus polyglottos -- -- -- Boat-tailed grackle Quiscalus major -- -- -- Carolina wren Thryothorus ludovicianus -- -- -- Mourning dove Zenaida macroura -- -- -- MAMMALS Feral dog (Coyote?)* Canis spp. -- -- -- Nine-banded armadillo Dasypus novemcinctus -- -- -- White-tailed deer* Odocoileus virginianus -- -- -- Raccoon Procyon lotor -- -- -- Gray squirrel Sciurus carolinensis -- -- -- FWC = Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission FWS = United States Fish and Wildlife Service SFWMD = South Florida Water Management District E = Endangered SSC = Species of Special Concern T = Threatened T (S/A) = Threatened (due to similarity of appearance to crocodile) WDS = Wetland dependent species -- = Not Listed * = Indicates species not directly observed but signs of the species (i.e. scat, tracks, etc.) were documented. Note: This table is based the results of listed species/wildlife surveys conducted by THA, Inc. 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 767 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Table 4. Animal species listed by FWS and FWC that were not observed on-site but could utilize or reside on the Veterans Memorial Blvd Extension property, along with their relative probability of occurrence. COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME STATUS PROBABILITY OF OCCURRENCE FWS FWC REPTILES & AMPHIBIANS Eastern indigo snake Drymarchon corais couperi T T Moderate Gopher frog Rana capito -- SSC Very Low BIRDS Southeastern American kestrel Falco sparverius paulus -- T Moderate MAMMALS Florida bonneted bat Eumops floridanus E E Very Low Big Cypress fox squirrel Sciurus niger avicennia -- T High Florida black bear Ursus americanus floridanus -- -- Moderate FWC = Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission FWS = United States Fish and Wildlife Service E = Endangered SSC = Species of Special Concern T = Threatened -- = Not Listed PROBABILITY OF OCCURRENCE = Relative probability of indicated species inhabiting or utilizing the sites as based on the following scale: Very High, High, Moderate, Low, Very Low. A rating of "none" indicates it is highly unlikely that the species may inhabit or utilize the area (no probability). 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 768 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Appendix 1: Tables Table 1. Existing FLUCFCS categories present on the Estancia property. FLUCFCS Code FLUCFCS Description Acres % of Total Property 190 Open Land 23.5 3.8 214 Row Crops 374.1 60.4 216 Fallow Ag Land 54.0 8.7 216H Hydric Fallow Ag Land 5.1 0.8 241 Tree Nursery 15.0 2.4 422/429 Brazilian Pepper / Wax Myrtle 2.1 0.3 619/433 Exotic Wetland Hardwoods / Hydric Hardwoods 16.1 2.6 619/618 Exotic Wetland Hardwoods / Willow 5.9 1.0 621/619 Cypress / Exotic Wetland Hardwoods 8.1 1.3 740 Disturbed Lands / Berms / Filled 79.9 12.9 OSW Agricultural Ditches 36.0 5.8 TOTAL ACRES 619.8 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 769 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Appendix 1: Tables Table 2. Information for the dates listed species/general wildlife surveys were conducted for the proposed Estancia project. Survey Date Survey Staff Weather Conditions Survey Time Period Total Survey Man-Hours 10/18/2013 TH, LG Windy, Partly cloudy. Low 72° High 79° 0800 – 1000 4 10/23/2013 TH Partly cloudy to overcast. Low 71° High 82° 0700 – 1300 6 10/28/2013 LG Clear and breezy Low 77° High 87° 1000 – 1800 8 11/04/2013 TH, JR Partly cloudy and breezy Low 80° High 86° 1400 – 1800 8 11/09/2013 TH Clear and calm Low 63° High 77° 0700 – 1100 4 12/29/2014 TH, JR Clear to partly cloudy. Low 65° High 79° 0645 – 1800 22.5 01/05/2015 TH Partly cloudy to overcast. Low 70° High 81° 0630 – 1900 12.5 01/20/2015 TH Partly cloudy to overcast. Low 64° High 71° 0700 – 1500 8 01/26/2015 TH Partly cloudy to overcast some light rain. Low 65° High 71° 1430 – 1830 4 02/13/2015 TH Clear and breezy Low 57° High 66° 1300 – 1830 5.5 02/20/2015 TH Clear and Calm. Low 37° High 57° 0645 – 1400 7.25 02/23/2015 TH Clear and Sunny. Low 51° High 67° 0630 – 1130 5 03/09/2015 TH Partly cloudy to overcast. Low 75° High 82° 1330 – 1830 5 03/16/2015 TH Clear to Partly cloudy. Low 77° High 81° 1200 – 2000 8 05/08/2015 TH Clear and Breezy. Low 84° High 87° 1400 – 1930 5.5 05/26/2015 TH Partly cloudy to overcast. Gusty. Low 86° High 91° 1000 – 1700 7 06/04/2015 TH Clear to Partly cloudy. Low 71° High 90° 0630 – 1500 8.5 Total Survey Man-Hours 128.75 TH = Tim Hall JR = Jeff Rogers LG = Lauren Gibson 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 770 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Appendix 1: Tables Table 3. Wildlife species observed on the Estancia property and/or within the project's off-site mitigation areas. COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME STATUS FWC FWS SFWMD REPTILES & AMPHIBIANS Cottonmouth Agkistrodon piscivorus -- -- -- American alligator Alligator mississippiensis SSC T(S/A) WDS Green anole Anolis carolinensis -- -- -- Brown anole Anolis sagrei -- -- -- Oak toad Bufo quercicus -- -- -- Southern toad Bufo terrestris -- -- -- Southern black racer Coluber constrictor priapus -- -- -- American crocodile Crocodylus acutus T T WDS Florida chicken turtle Deirochelys reticularia chrysea -- -- -- Green treefrog Hyla cinerea -- -- -- Florida red-bellied turtle Pseudemys nelsoni -- -- -- Pig frog Rana grylio -- -- -- Leopard frog Rana sphenocephala -- -- -- Common musk turtle Sternotherus odoratus -- -- -- BIRDS Red-winged blackbird Agelaius phoeniceus -- -- -- Anhinga Anhinga anhinga -- -- -- Great blue heron Ardea herodias -- -- -- Cattle egret Bubulcus ibis -- -- -- Red-tailed hawk Buteo jamaicensis -- -- -- Red-shouldered hawk Buteo lineatus -- -- -- Green heron Butorides virescens -- -- -- Chuck-will’s-widow Caprimulgus carolinensis -- -- -- Northern cardinal Cardinalis cardinalis -- -- -- Turkey vulture Cathartes aura -- -- -- Common killdeer Charadrius vociferus -- -- -- Ground dove Columbina passerina -- -- -- Black vulture Coragyps atratus -- -- -- American crow Corvus brachyrhynchos -- -- -- Great egret Egretta alba -- -- -- Little blue heron Egretta caerulea SSC -- WDS Snowy egret Egretta thula SSC -- WDS Tricolored heron Egretta tricolor SSC -- WDS Swallow-tailed kite Elanoides forficatus -- -- -- White ibis Eudocimus albus SSC -- WDS Common yellowthroat Geothlypsis trichas -- -- -- Florida sandhill crane Grus canadensis pratensis T -- WDS Bald eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Red-bellied woodpecker Melanerpes carolinus -- -- -- Northern mockingbird Mimus polyglottos -- -- -- Wood stork Mycteria americana E E WDS 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 771 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Appendix 1: Tables COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME STATUS FWC FWS SFWMD House sparrow Passer domesticus -- -- -- Double-crested cormorant Phalacrocorax auritus -- -- -- Boat-tailed grackle Quiscalus major -- -- -- Carolina wren Thryothorus ludovicianus -- -- -- Mourning dove Zenaida macroura -- -- -- MAMMALS Feral dog (Coyote?)* Canis spp. -- -- -- Nine-banded armadillo* Dasypus novemcinctus -- -- -- Virginia opossum Didelphis virginiana -- -- -- Bobcat* Felis rufus -- -- -- White-tailed deer* Odocoileus virginianus -- -- -- Raccoon Procyon lotor -- -- -- Gray squirrel Sciurus carolinensis -- -- -- Marsh rabbit Sylvilagus palustris -- -- -- FISH Chain pickerel Esox niger -- -- -- Mosquitofish Gambusia spp. -- -- -- Topminnow Fundulus sp. -- -- -- Least killifish Heterandria Formosa -- -- -- Redear sunfish Lepomis microlophus -- -- -- FWC = Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission FWS = United States Fish and Wildlife Service SFWM = South Florida Water Management District E = Endangered SSC = Species of Special Concern T = Threatened T (S/A) = Threatened (due to similarity of appearance to crocodile) WDS = Wetland dependent species -- = Not Listed * = Indicates species not directly observed but signs of the species (i.e. scat, were documentedNote: This table is based on species the results of listed species/wildlife surveys conducted by THA, Inc. 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 772 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Appendix 1: Tables Table 4. Animal species listed by FWS and FWC that were not observed on-site but could utilize or reside on the Estancia property, along with their relative probability of occurrence. COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME STATUS PROBABILITY OF OCCURRENCE FWS FWC REPTILES & AMPHIBIANS Eastern indigo snake Drymarchon corais couperi T T Moderate Gopher tortoise Gopherus polyphemus -- SSC Low / Very Low Gopher frog Rana capito -- SSC Very Low BIRDS Roseate spoonbill Ajaja ajaja -- SSC Low Limpkin Aramus guarauna -- SSC Moderate Burrowing owl Athene cunicularia -- SSC Low / Very Low Crested caracara Caracara cheriway T T Moderate / Low Peregrine falcon Falco peregrinus -- E Low Southeastern American Falco sparverius paulus -- T Moderate / Very MAMMALS Florida panther Puma concolor coryi E E Low Big Cypress fox squirrel Sciurus niger avicennia -- T Very Low Florida black bear Ursus americanus floridanus -- T Moderate FWC = Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation FWS = United States Fish and Wildlife Service E = Endangered SSC = Species of Special Concern T = Threatened -- =Not ListedProbability of Occurrence = Relative probability of indicated species inhabiting or utilizing the sites as based on the following scale: Very High, High, Moderate, Low, Very Low. A rating of "none" indicates it is highly unlikely that the species may inhabit or utilize the area (no probability). 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 773 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) <> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SUBJECTPROPERTYSUBJECTPROPERTY<> LATITUDE: N 26° 17' 53.976"<> LONGITUDE: W 81° 47' 16.283"<> 00146640104,00145720106,00146080007,00153160004NAPLES, FL 34110REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:DESIGNED:p:\19094.00 veteran memorial blvd extension\CAD\PERMIT-FEDERAL\19094-FED.dwg LOCATION 11/12/2019 THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:THRMJ11-12-1919094-LOCATION MAP-------------------01 OF 05NESW     8588288641MARCOISLANDEVERGLADESCITY9329846NAPLES90908399483783784129292983983992887846951862I-758486431856850846890896KEY WESTTAMPAFT.MYERSMIAMINAPLESSUBJECTPROPERTY28.A.18Packet Pg. 774Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, NESW0250500 1000SCALE IN FEETREV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:DESIGNED:p:\19094.00 veteran memorial blvd extension\CAD\PERMIT-FEDERAL\19094-FED.dwg FLUCFCS 11/12/2019 THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:THRMJ11-12-1919094-FLUCFCS MAP-------------------02 OF 05xSURVEY COURTESY OF:xxSURVEY DATED:NOTES:xTHESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE."RWA, INC."09-03-19624617624411E1411E1624621814PROPERTYLINE411E2411416UPLAND (ACRES):WETLAND (ACRES):PROJECT (ACRES):8141234510967811LIVINGSTON RDFLUCFCS AREAS 'A' & 'B'IDFLUCFCSDESCRIPTIONAREA(AC)1411E1PINE FLATWOODS (EXOTICS 0-25%)17.012624CYPRESS - PINE - CABBAGE PALM0.013617 MIXED WETLAND HARDWOODS0.314624CYPRESS - PINE - CABBAGE PALM0.085814ROADS AND HIGHWAYS0.126411E2PINE FLATWOODS (EXOTICS 25-50%)2.137411PINE FLATWOODS1.568416SCRUBBY FLATWOODS0.719621CYPRESS0.3210 624CYPRESS - PINE - CABBAGE PALM0.3511814ROADS AND HIGHWAYS11.60TOTAL34.2028.A.18Packet Pg. 775Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, NESW0 150 300600SCALE IN FEETREV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:DESIGNED:p:\19094.00 veteran memorial blvd extension\CAD\PERMIT-FEDERAL\19094-FED.dwg TORT DET-EAST 11/12/2019 THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:THRMJ11-12-1919094-TORTOISE BURROW MAP-------------------03 OF 05SCALE: 1" = 300'AREA 'A'SCALE: 1" = 300'AREA 'B'PROPERTYLINEPROPERTYLINEMATCHLINEAREA "A"MATCHLINEAREA "B"xSURVEY COURTESY OF:xxSURVEY DATED:NOTES:xTHESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE."RWA, INC."09-03-19297296294295ACTIVE TORTOISE BURROWABANDONED TORTOISE BURROW28.A.18Packet Pg. 776Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, NESW0 150 300600SCALE IN FEETREV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:DESIGNED:p:\19094.00 veteran memorial blvd extension\CAD\PERMIT-FEDERAL\19094-FED.dwg CAVITIES DET-EAST 11/12/2019 THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:THRMJ11-12-1919094-TREE CAVITIES MAP-------------------04 OF 05SCALE: 1" = 300'AREA 'A'SCALE: 1" = 300'AREA 'B'PROPERTYLINEPROPERTYLINEMATCHLINEAREA "A"MATCHLINEAREA "B"xSURVEY COURTESY OF:xxSURVEY DATED:NOTES:xTHESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE."RWA, INC."09-03-19309308307306305304303300299298287289288290293291292TREE CAVITIES28.A.18Packet Pg. 777Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, NESW0 600 12002400SCALE IN FEETREV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:DESIGNED:p:\19094.00 veteran memorial blvd extension\CAD\PERMIT-FEDERAL\19094-FED.dwg SOILS 11/12/2019 THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:THRMJ11-12-1919094-SOILS MAP-------------------05 OF 05xSURVEY COURTESY OF:xxSURVEY DATED:NOTES:xTHESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.xSOIL DATA PROVIDED BY:1998 UNITED STATES DEPT OF AGRICULTURESOIL SURVEY OF COLLIER COUNTY AREA, FL"RWA, INC."09-03-1914332125PROPERTYBOUNDARYPROPERTYBOUNDARY397187CODEDESCRIPTIONHYDRIC3MALABAR FINE SANDYES7IMMOKALEE FINE SAND14PINEDA FINE SAND, LIMESTONESUBSTRATUMYES18RIVIERA FINE SAND, LIMESTONESUBSTRATUMYES21BOCA FINE SAND25BOCA, RIVIERA, LIMESTONESUBSTRATUM, AND COPELAND FINESANDS, DEPRESSIONALYES33URBAN LAND-HOLOPAW-BASINGERCOMPLEX38URBAN LAND-MATLACHA-BOCACOMPLEX39SATELLITE FINE SAND2731428.A.18Packet Pg. 778Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, WĂŐĞͮϯϱ y,//dϭϱ y/^d/E'Z/E'WddZE^EZWƐ 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 779 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) HORIZ. SCALE (FULL):DATECHECKEDDRAWNRGE:TWP:SEC:DATE:TITLE:CLIENT:PROJECT:OFPROJECT NO.:SHEET NUMBER:REVISIONREV #HORIZ. SCALE (HALF):DESIGNED:DRAWN:VERT. SCALE (FULL):VERT. SCALE (HALF):FILE NAME:FLORIDA LICENSE NO.ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTSVETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD.COLLIER COUNTY%2$5'2)&200,66,21(5611190062.00.00AUGUST 20191" = 400'1" = 800'.. .. ..KMWSCBN/AN/A190062.00.00 EX0165023KEISHA M. WESTBROOK, P.E.EXHIBIT 15 - EXISTING DRAINAGE PATTERNS AND ERPSFeet0 60 1206610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200Naples, Florida 34109(239) 597-0575 FAX: (239) 597-0578www.consult-rwa.comFlorida Certificates of AuthorizationEB 7663 LB695228.A.18Packet Pg. 780Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, WĂŐĞͮϯϲ y,//dϭϲ >dZEd/sWKE^/dKE&/'hZd/KE^ 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 781 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Feet02040SCALE:RGE:TWP:SEC:DATE:TITLE:CLIENT:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:PROJECTSHEETFILENUMBER:NUMBER:NUMBER:OF6610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200 | Naples, Florida 34109(239) 597-0575 FAX: (239) 597-0578www.consult-rwa.comFlorida Certificates of Authorization EB 7663 LB 6952COLLIER COUNTY %2$5'2)&200,66,21(56VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD POND SITE REPORTPOND SECTION OPTION 110/191" = 40'JSHKMW3 51S 26E12LITTORAL ZONE PLANTING LISTZONE 1 SPECIES: ELEV. CONTROL TO 2' BELOWCONTROLHERBACEOUS SPECIESJOINTGRASS (PASPALUM VAGINATUM)WIREGRASS (ARISTIDA STRICTA)ARROW ARUM (PELTANDRA VIRGINICA)MAIDENCANE (PANICUM HEMITOMON)SOFT RUSH (JUNCUS EFFUSUS)BLUE FLAG IRIS (IRIS HEXAGONA)GOLDEN CANNA (CANNA FLACCIDA)SAND CORDGRASS (SPARTINA BAKERRII)SWAMP LILY (CRINUM AMERICANUM)SMARTWEED (POLYGONUM SPP.)SPIDER LILY (HYMENOCALLIS PALMERI)GIANT BULRUSH (SCIRPUS CALIFORNICUS)TREES AND SHRUBSRED MAPLE (ACER RUBRUM)CYPRESS (TAXODIUM DISTICHUM, T. ASCENDEMS)LAUREL OAK (QUERCUS LAURIFOLIA)POPASH (FRAVINUS CAROLINIANA)WILLOW (SALIX CAROLINIANA)WAX MYRTLE (MYRICA CERIFERA)DAHOON HOLLY (ILEX CASSINE)BUTTON BUSH (CEPHALANTHUS OCCIDENTALIS)MYRSINE (MYRSINE GUIANENSIS)POND APPLE (ANNONA GLABRA)ELDERBERRY (SAMBUCUS CANADENSIS)ZONE 2 SPECIES: 2' BELOW CONTROL TO 3' BELOWCONTROLPICKERELWEED (PONTEDERIA CORDATA)COMMON ARROWHEAD (SAGITTARIA LATIFOLIA)COASTAL ARROWHEAD (SAGITTARIA GRAMINEA)SOFT-STEM BULRUSH (SCIRPUS CALIFORNICUS, S.VALIDUS)SPIKE RUSH (ELEOCHARIS SPP.)FIRE FLAG (THALIA GENICULATA)SAWGRASS (CLADIUM JAMAICENSE)LITTORAL PLANTING NOTES:2. PLANTED SPECIES MAY DEVIATE FROMTHOSE LISTED DEPENDING UPON SITECONDITIONS AND AVAILABILITY OFSTOCK. 28.A.18Packet Pg. 782Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, Feet02040SCALE:RGE:TWP:SEC:DATE:TITLE:CLIENT:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:PROJECTSHEETFILENUMBER:NUMBER:NUMBER:OF6610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200 | Naples, Florida 34109(239) 597-0575 FAX: (239) 597-0578www.consult-rwa.comFlorida Certificates of Authorization EB 7663 LB 6952COLLIER COUNTY DEPT. TRANSPORTATION£VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD POND SITE REPORTPOND SECTION OPTION 210/191" = 40'JSHKMW3 51S 26E22LITTORAL ZONE PLANTING LISTZONE 1 SPECIES: ELEV. CONTROL TO 2'BELOW CONTROLHERBACEOUS SPECIESJOINTGRASS (PASPALUM VAGINATUM)WIREGRASS (ARISTIDA STRICTA)ARROW ARUM (PELTANDRA VIRGINICA)MAIDENCANE (PANICUM HEMITOMON)SOFT RUSH (JUNCUS EFFUSUS)BLUE FLAG IRIS (IRIS HEXAGONA)GOLDEN CANNA (CANNA FLACCIDA)SAND CORDGRASS (SPARTINA BAKERRII)SWAMP LILY (CRINUM AMERICANUM)SMARTWEED (POLYGONUM SPP.)SPIDER LILY (HYMENOCALLIS PALMERI)GIANT BULRUSH (SCIRPUS CALIFORNICUS)TREES AND SHRUBSRED MAPLE (ACER RUBRUM)CYPRESS (TAXODIUM DISTICHUM, T.ASCENDEMS)LAUREL OAK (QUERCUS LAURIFOLIA)POPASH (FRAVINUS CAROLINIANA)WILLOW (SALIX CAROLINIANA)WAX MYRTLE (MYRICA CERIFERA)DAHOON HOLLY (ILEX CASSINE)BUTTON BUSH (CEPHALANTHUSOCCIDENTALIS)MYRSINE (MYRSINE GUIANENSIS)POND APPLE (ANNONA GLABRA)ELDERBERRY (SAMBUCUS CANADENSIS)ZONE 2 SPECIES: 2' BELOW CONTROL TO 3'BELOW CONTROLPICKERELWEED (PONTEDERIA CORDATA)COMMON ARROWHEAD (SAGITTARIALATIFOLIA)COASTAL ARROWHEAD (SAGITTARIAGRAMINEA)SOFT-STEM BULRUSH (SCIRPUSCALIFORNICUS, S. VALIDUS)SPIKE RUSH (ELEOCHARIS SPP.)FIRE FLAG (THALIA GENICULATA)SAWGRASS (CLADIUM JAMAICENSE)LITTORAL PLANTING NOTES:2. PLANTED SPECIES MAY DEVIATEFROM THOSE LISTED DEPENDINGUPON SITE CONDITIONS ANDAVAILABILITY OF STOCK. 28.A.18Packet Pg. 783Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, WĂŐĞͮϯϳ y,//dϭϳ ^dKZDtdZDE'DEd>h>d/KE^ 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 784 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) 3URMHFW 3URM7DVN &DOFXODWHG%\6&%'DWH1RY &KHFNHG%\.0:'DWH1RY &RQWHQWV 6WDII5HSRUW'DWD 2Q6LWH/DQG8VH&DOFXODWLRQV 6XE%DVLQ&DOFXODWLRQV :DWHU4XDOLW\&DOFXODWLRQV Veterans Memorial BLVD Roadway Improvements - Phase 1 :DWHU0DQDJHPHQW&DOFXODWLRQV 9HWHUDQV0HPRULDO%/9',PSURYHPHQWV 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 785 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April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acket Pg. 786 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April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acket Pg. 787 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) 7RWDO6XE%DVLQ$UHD$F 3DYHPHQW 2SHQ6SDFH3HUYLRXV 3UHVHUYH /DNH$UHD /DNH%DQN$UHD 'HWHQWLRQ$UHD 'HWHQWLRQ%DQN$UHD 7RWDO3DYHPHQW 7RWDO2SHQ6SDFH3HUYLRXV 7RWDO6XE%DVLQ$UHD$F 9HWHUDQV0HPRULDO%/9'5RDGZD\,PSURYHPHQWV3KDVH 2Q6LWH/DQG8VH&DOFXODWLRQV 6XE%DVLQ 6XE%DVLQ 6XE%DVLQ 3URMHFW7RWDO .??9HWHUDQV0HPRULDO%RXOHYDUG?(QYLURQPHQWDO5HVRXUFH3HUPLW(53$SSOLFDWLRQ?&DOFXODWLRQV?:DWHU0DQDJHPHQW?:RUNLQJ'RFV? :DWHU0DQDJHPHQW&DOFV%DVLQ3KDVH MMV RI 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 788 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April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acket Pg. 789 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April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acket Pg. 790 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April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acket Pg. 791 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April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required / ((( Atop + Abottom ) / 2 ) x ( Etop - Ebottom )))x ( Etop - Ebottom )) + Ebottom %OHHGHU&DOFXODWLRQV 1/2 in x 1ft/12in x [(Area - Lake) (ac)] = Volume (ac-ft) 'LVFKDUJH9ROXPH DFIW SHUKU Volume (ac-ft) x 1 day/24hours x 1hr/60min x 1min/60sec = Discharge (cfs) 'LVFKDUJH5DWH4FIV %OHHGHU2ULILFH6L]LQJ %OHHGHU2ULILFH6L]LQJ 4 $+A4 $+A &LUFXODU$ ʌ K&LUFXODU$ ʌ K $VVXPLQJKLQ $VVXPLQJKLQ +IW+IW $VTIW$VTIW ELQ4FIV 4FIV 9HWHUDQV0HPRULDO%/9'5RDGZD\,PSURYHPHQWV3KDVH :DWHU4XDOLW\&DOFXODWLRQV &RQWUROVDQGDZDWHUTXDOLW\YROXPHRI .??9HWHUDQV0HPRULDO%RXOHYDUG?(QYLURQPHQWDO5HVRXUFH3HUPLW(53$SSOLFDWLRQ?&DOFXODWLRQV?:DWHU0DQDJHPHQW?:RUNLQJ'RFV?:DWHU0DQDJHPHQW&DOFV%DVLQ3KDVH MMV RI 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 792 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) 3URMHFW 3URM7DVN &DOFXODWHG%\6&%'DWH2FW &KHFNHG%\.0:'DWH &RQWHQWV 6WDII5HSRUW'DWD 2Q6LWH/DQG8VH&DOFXODWLRQV 6XE%DVLQ&DOFXODWLRQV :DWHU4XDOLW\&DOFXODWLRQV 9HWHUDQV0HPRULDO%/9',PSURYHPHQWV Phase 2 Overall - Drainage Basin 1 9HWHUDQV0HPRULDO%/9',PSURYHPHQWV :DWHU0DQDJHPHQW&DOFXODWLRQV .??9HWHUDQV0HPRULDO%RXOHYDUG?(QYLURQPHQWDO5HVRXUFH3HUPLW(53$SSOLFDWLRQ?&DOFXODWLRQV?:DWHU0DQDJHPHQW?:RUNLQJ'RFV?:DWHU0DQDJHPHQW&DOFV6PDOO6LWH 7DE6XPPDU\ 3DJHRI 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 793 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April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acket Pg. 794 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April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acket Pg. 795 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) 7RWDO6XE%DVLQ$UHD$F %XLOGLQJ 'ULYHZD\V3RRO'HFN 3DUNLQJ 3DYHPHQW6LGHZDON /DNH%DQN$UHD 3UHVHUYH /DNH$UHD 7RWDO%XLOGLQJ 7RWDO3DYHPHQW 7RWDO2SHQ6SDFH3HUYLRXV 7RWDO6XE%DVLQ$UHD$F 9HWHUDQV0HPRULDO%RXOHYDUG,PSURYHPHQWV %DVLQ 2Q6LWH7RWDO 2Q6LWH,PSHUYLRXV3HUYLRXV&DOFXODWLRQV .??9HWHUDQV0HPRULDO%RXOHYDUG?(QYLURQPHQWDO5HVRXUFH3HUPLW(53$SSOLFDWLRQ?&DOFXODWLRQV?:DWHU0DQDJHPHQW?:RUNLQJ'RFV?:DWHU0DQDJHPHQW&DOFV6PDOO6LWH 7DE,PSHUY3HUY&DOF 3DJHRI 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 796 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April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acket Pg. 797 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April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olume (ac-ft) = 1/2 in x 1ft/12in x [(Area - Lake) (ac)] 'LVFKDUJH9ROXPH DFIW SHUKU Discharge (cfs) = Volume (ac-ft) x 1 day/24hours x 1hr/60min x 1min/60sec 'LVFKDUJH5DWH4 FIV $VVXPLQJK LQFK LQFK +IW $VTIW E LQFK %OHHGHU2ULILFH6L]LQJ %OHHGHU2ULILFH6L]LQJ 9HWHUDQV0HPRULDO%RXOHYDUG,PSURYHPHQWV :DWHU4XDOLW\&DOFXODWLRQV &RQWUROVDQGDZDWHUTXDOLW\YROXPHRI (OHYDWLRQ /DNH $UHDDF $YDORQRI1DSOHV 2II6LWH7XUQ/DQH $VTIW 4FIV Q = 4.8 A H^1/2 Q = 4.8 A H^1/2 5HFWDQJXODU$ K E &LUFXODU$ ʌ K $VVXPLQJK +IW .??9HWHUDQV0HPRULDO%RXOHYDUG?(QYLURQPHQWDO5HVRXUFH3HUPLW(53$SSOLFDWLRQ?&DOFXODWLRQV?:DWHU0DQDJHPHQW?:RUNLQJ'RFV?:DWHU0DQDJHPHQW&DOFV6PDOO6LWH 7DE:4 3DJHRI 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 798 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) 3URMHFW 3URM7DVN &DOFXODWHG%\6&%'DWH1RY &KHFNHG%\.0:'DWH &RQWHQWV 6WDII5HSRUW'DWD 2Q6LWH/DQG8VH&DOFXODWLRQV 6XE%DVLQ&DOFXODWLRQV :DWHU4XDOLW\&DOFXODWLRQV 9HWHUDQV0HPRULDO%/9',PSURYHPHQWV Phase 2 Overall - Drainage Basin 2 :DWHU0DQDJHPHQW&DOFXODWLRQV 9HWHUDQV0HPRULDO%/9',PSURYHPHQWV 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 799 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April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acket Pg. 800 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April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acket Pg. 801 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) 7RWDO6XE%DVLQ$UHD$F 3DYHPHQW 2SHQ6SDFH3HUYLRXV 3UHVHUYH /DNH$UHD /DNH%DQN$UHD 'HWHQWLRQ$UHD 'HWHQWLRQ%DQN$UHD 7RWDO3DYHPHQW 7RWDO2SHQ6SDFH3HUYLRXV 7RWDO6XE%DVLQ$UHD$F 9HWHUDQV0HPRULDO%/9',PSURYHPHQWV 2Q6LWH/DQG8VH&DOFXODWLRQV 6XE%DVLQ 6XE%DVLQ 6XE%DVLQ3URMHFW7RWDO6XE%DVLQ .??9HWHUDQV0HPRULDO%RXOHYDUG?(QYLURQPHQWDO5HVRXUFH3HUPLW(53$SSOLFDWLRQ?&DOFXODWLRQV?:DWHU0DQDJHPHQW?:RUNLQJ'RFV?:DWHU0DQDJHPHQW&DOFV %DVLQ MMV RI 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 802 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April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acket Pg. 803 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) $YHUDJH6LWH*UDGH $YJ(OHY $UHD 2SHQ6SDFH 5RDGZD\ /DNH%DQN 'HWHQWLRQ%DQN $YJ6LWH*UDGH 6RLO6WRUDJH 6XE%DVLQ$UHD 3HUYLRXV$UHD $YHUDJH6LWH*UDGHIW &RQWURO(OHYDWLRQIW $YHUDJH'HSWKWR:DWHU7DEOHIW 6RLO&RPSDFWLRQ)DFWRULH 'HYHORSHG6WRUDJH$YDLODEOHLQ)URP6):0'%DVLVIRU5HYLHZ9ROXPH,9 $YDLODEOH6RLO6WRUDJH 'HYHORSHG6WRUDJH$YDLODEOH[3HUYLRXV$UHDLQFKHVIW 6LWH:LGH6RLO6WRUDJH6$YDLODEOH6RLO6WRUDJH6LWH$UHD[LQFKHVIW &1IRU6XE%DVLQ &1 6 6WDJH6WRUDJH 6WDJH$UHD$F $UHD /DNH 'HWHQWLRQ 2SHQ6SDFH 5RDGZD\ /DNH%DQN 'HWHQWLRQ%DQN 6WDJH9ROXPH$) $UHD /DNH 2SHQ6SDFH 5RDGZD\ /DNH%DQN (OHYDWLRQ5DQJH (OHYDWLRQ5DQJH 9HWHUDQV0HPRULDO%/9',PSURYHPHQWV 68%%$6,1&$/&8/$7,216 (OHYDWLRQ5DQJH $UHD[$YJ(OHY .??9HWHUDQV0HPRULDO%RXOHYDUG?(QYLURQPHQWDO5HVRXUFH3HUPLW(53$SSOLFDWLRQ?&DOFXODWLRQV?:DWHU0DQDJHPHQW?:RUNLQJ'RFV?:DWHU 0DQDJHPHQW&DOFV%DVLQ MMV RI 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 804 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April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acket Pg. 805 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April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acket Pg. 806 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April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required / ((( Atop + Abottom ) / 2 ) x ( Etop - Ebottom )))x ( Etop - Ebottom )) + Ebottom %OHHGHU&DOFXODWLRQV 1/2 in x 1ft/12in x [(Area - Lake) (ac)] = Volume (ac-ft) 'LVFKDUJH9ROXPH DFIW SHUKU Volume (ac-ft) x 1 day/24hours x 1hr/60min x 1min/60sec = Discharge (cfs) 'LVFKDUJH5DWH4FIV %OHHGHU2ULILFH6L]LQJ 4 $+A &LUFXODU$ ʌ K $VVXPLQJKLQ +IW $VTIW 4FIV 9HWHUDQV0HPRULDO%/9',PSURYHPHQWV :DWHU4XDOLW\&DOFXODWLRQV &RQWUROVDQGDZDWHUTXDOLW\YROXPHRI .??9HWHUDQV0HPRULDO%RXOHYDUG?(QYLURQPHQWDO5HVRXUFH3HUPLW(53$SSOLFDWLRQ?&DOFXODWLRQV?:DWHU0DQDJHPHQW?:RUNLQJ'RFV?:DWHU0DQDJHPHQW&DOFV%DVLQ MMV RI 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 807 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) WĂŐĞͮϯϴ y,//dϭϴ /WZdE^/Dh>d/KEZ^h>d^ 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 808 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) 1 C:\Users\sball\Desktop\Veterans Memorial East of Railroad 3 basin ICPR\11/5/2019 14:17 Simple Basin: Basin 2 Scenario: Scenario1 Node: Wet Pond 1 Hydrograph Method: NRCS Unit Hydrograph Infiltration Method: Curve Number Time of Concentration: 10.0000 min Max Allowable Q: 0.00 cfs Time Shift: 0.0000 hr Unit Hydrograph: UH256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Area: 3.2600 ac Curve Number: 89.4 % Impervious: 0.00 % DCIA: 0.00 % Direct: 0.00 Rainfall Name: ~SFWMD-72 Comment: Simple Basin: Basin 3 Scenario: Scenario1 Node: Detention 2 Hydrograph Method: NRCS Unit Hydrograph Infiltration Method: Curve Number Time of Concentration: 10.0000 min Max Allowable Q: 0.00 cfs Time Shift: 0.0000 hr Unit Hydrograph: UH256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Area: 17.6300 ac Curve Number: 83.0 % Impervious: 0.00 % DCIA: 0.00 % Direct: 0.00 Rainfall Name: ~SFWMD-72 Comment: Simple Basin: Basin 4 Scenario: Scenario1 Node: Detention 3 Hydrograph Method: NRCS Unit Hydrograph Infiltration Method: Curve Number Time of Concentration: 10.0000 min Max Allowable Q: 0.00 cfs 1IBTF*OQVU1BSBNFUFST 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 809 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) 2 C:\Users\sball\Desktop\Veterans Memorial East of Railroad 3 basin ICPR\11/5/2019 14:17 Time Shift: 0.0000 hr Unit Hydrograph: UH256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Area: 8.7500 ac Curve Number: 79.4 % Impervious: 0.00 % DCIA: 0.00 % Direct: 0.00 Rainfall Name: ~SFWMD-72 Comment: Node: Detention 2 Scenario: Scenario1 Type: Stage/Area Base Flow: 0.00 cfs Initial Stage: 10.50 ft Warning Stage: 0.00 ft Stage [ft]Area [ac]Area [ft2] 10.50 0.0000 0 11.50 4.0200 175111 12.50 5.0400 219542 13.40 5.9600 259618 14.20 12.6300 550163 14.80 17.6300 767963 15.60 17.6300 767963 Comment: Node: Detention 3 Scenario: Scenario1 Type: Stage/Area Base Flow: 0.00 cfs Initial Stage: 10.50 ft Warning Stage: 0.00 ft Stage [ft]Area [ac]Area [ft2] 10.50 0.0000 0 11.50 1.9600 85378 12.50 2.2900 99752 13.40 2.5900 112820 14.20 2.8500 124146 14.80 5.3800 234353 15.60 8.7500 381150 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 810 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) 3 C:\Users\sball\Desktop\Veterans Memorial East of Railroad 3 basin ICPR\11/5/2019 14:17 Comment: Node: Outfall 1 Scenario: Scenario1 Type: Time/Stage Base Flow: 0.00 cfs Initial Stage: 6.00 ft Warning Stage: 0.00 ft Boundary Stage: Year Month Day Hour Stage [ft] 0 0 0 0.0000 6.00 0 0 0 72.0000 8.00 0 0 0 360.0000 6.00 Comment: Node: Wet Pond 1 Scenario: Scenario1 Type: Stage/Area Base Flow: 0.00 cfs Initial Stage: 10.50 ft Warning Stage: 0.00 ft Stage [ft]Area [ac]Area [ft2] 10.50 1.5900 69260 11.50 1.7200 74923 12.50 1.8600 81022 13.40 1.9800 86249 14.20 2.7100 118048 14.80 3.2600 142006 15.60 3.2600 142006 Comment: Drop Structure Link: CS-1 Scenario: Scenario1 From Node: Wet Pond 1 To Node: Outfall 1 Link Count: 1 Flow Direction: Both Upstream Pipe Downstream Pipe Invert: 8.00 ft Invert: 8.00 ft Manning's N: 0.0120 Manning's N: 0.0120 Geometry: Circular Geometry: Circular Max Depth: 1.50 ft Max Depth: 1.50 ft Bottom Clip 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 811 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) 4 C:\Users\sball\Desktop\Veterans Memorial East of Railroad 3 basin ICPR\11/5/2019 14:17 Solution: Combine Increments: 0 Pipe Count: 1 Damping: 0.0000 ft Length: 150.00 ft FHWA Code: 0 Entr Loss Coef: 0.00 Exit Loss Coef: 0.00 Bend Loss Coef: 0.00 Bend Location: 0.00 ft Energy Switch: Energy Default: 0.00 ft Default: 0.00 ft Op Table:Op Table: Ref Node:Ref Node: Manning's N: 0.0000 Manning's N: 0.0000 Top Clip Default: 0.00 ft Default: 0.00 ft Op Table:Op Table: Ref Node:Ref Node: Manning's N: 0.0000 Manning's N: 0.0000 Pipe Comment: Weir Component Weir: 1 Weir Count: 1 Weir Flow Direction: Both Damping: 0.0000 ft Weir Type: Sharp Crested Vertical Geometry Type: Circular Invert: 10.50 ft Control Elevation: 10.50 ft Max Depth: 0.33 ft Bottom Clip Default: 0.00 ft Op Table: Ref Node: Top Clip Default: 0.00 ft Op Table: Ref Node: Discharge Coefficients Weir Default: 3.200 Weir Table: Orifice Default: 0.600 Orifice Table: Weir Comment: Weir Component Weir: 2 Weir Count: 1 Weir Flow Direction: Both Damping: 0.0000 ft Weir Type: Sharp Crested Vertical Geometry Type: Rectangular Invert: 11.96 ft Control Elevation: 10.50 ft Max Depth: 0.50 ft Max Width: 1.25 ft Fillet: 0.00 ft Bottom Clip Default: 0.00 ft Op Table: Ref Node: Top Clip Default: 0.00 ft Op Table: Ref Node: Discharge Coefficients Weir Default: 3.200 Weir Table: Orifice Default: 0.600 Orifice Table: Weir Comment: Drop Structure Comment: 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 812 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) 5 C:\Users\sball\Desktop\Veterans Memorial East of Railroad 3 basin ICPR\11/5/2019 14:17 Pipe Link: Interconnect 2 Scenario: Scenario1 From Node: Wet Pond 1 To Node: Detention 2 Link Count: 1 Flow Direction: Both Damping: 0.0000 ft Length: 20.00 ft FHWA Code: 0 Entr Loss Coef: 0.00 Exit Loss Coef: 0.00 Bend Loss Coef: 0.00 Bend Location: 0.00 ft Energy Switch: Energy Upstream Downstream Invert: 10.50 ft Invert: 10.50 ft Manning's N: 0.0120 Manning's N: 0.0120 Geometry: Circular Geometry: Circular Max Depth: 2.50 ft Max Depth: 2.50 ft Bottom Clip Default: 0.00 ft Default: 0.00 ft Op Table:Op Table: Ref Node:Ref Node: Manning's N: 0.0000 Manning's N: 0.0000 Top Clip Default: 0.00 ft Default: 0.00 ft Op Table:Op Table: Ref Node:Ref Node: Manning's N: 0.0000 Manning's N: 0.0000 Comment: Pipe Link: Interconnect 3 Scenario: Scenario1 From Node: Detention 2 To Node: Detention 3 Link Count: 1 Flow Direction: Both Damping: 0.0000 ft Length: 49.64 ft FHWA Code: 0 Entr Loss Coef: 0.00 Exit Loss Coef: 0.00 Bend Loss Coef: 0.00 Bend Location: 0.00 ft Energy Switch: Energy Upstream Downstream Invert: 10.50 ft Invert: 10.50 ft Manning's N: 0.0120 Manning's N: 0.0120 Geometry: Vertical Ellipse Geometry: Circular Max Depth: 2.50 ft Max Depth: 2.50 ft Bottom Clip Default: 0.00 ft Default: 0.00 ft Op Table:Op Table: Ref Node:Ref Node: Manning's N: 0.0000 Manning's N: 0.0000 Top Clip Default: 0.00 ft Default: 0.00 ft Op Table:Op Table: Ref Node:Ref Node: Manning's N: 0.0000 Manning's N: 0.0000 Comment: Simulation: 100 year 3 day Scenario: Scenario1 Run Date/Time: 9/16/2019 8:19:42 AM Program Version: ICPR4 4.05.02 General Run Mode: Normal Year Month Day Hour [hr] Start Time:0 0 0 0.0000 End Time:0 0 0 360.0000 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 813 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) 6 C:\Users\sball\Desktop\Veterans Memorial East of Railroad 3 basin ICPR\11/5/2019 14:17 Hydrology [sec]Surface Hydraulics [sec] Min Calculation Time:60.0000 0.1000 Max Calculation Time:30.0000 Output Time Increments Hydrology Year Month Day Hour [hr]Time Increment [min] 0 0 0 0.0000 15.0000 Surface Hydraulics Year Month Day Hour [hr]Time Increment [min] 0 0 0 0.0000 15.0000 Restart File Save Restart: False Resources & Lookup Tables Resources Lookup Tables Rainfall Folder:Boundary Stage Set: Extern Hydrograph Set: Unit Hydrograph Folder:Curve Number Set: Green-Ampt Set: Vertical Layers Set: Impervious Set: Tolerances & Options Time Marching: SAOR IA Recovery Time: 24.0000 hr Max Iterations: 6 Over-Relax Weight Fact: 0.5 dec dZ Tolerance: 0.0010 ft Smp/Man Basin Rain Opt: Global Max dZ: 1.0000 ft Link Optimizer Tol: 0.0001 ft Rainfall Name: ~SFWMD-72 Rainfall Amount: 15.00 in Edge Length Option: Automatic Storm Duration: 72.0000 hr Dflt Damping (1D): 0.0050 ft Min Node Srf Area (1D): 100 ft2 Energy Switch (1D): Energy Comment: 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 814 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) 7 C:\Users\sball\Desktop\Veterans Memorial East of Railroad 3 basin ICPR\11/5/2019 14:17 Simulation: 25 year 3 Day Scenario: Scenario1 Run Date/Time: 11/5/2019 1:48:18 PM Program Version: ICPR4 4.05.02 General Run Mode: Normal Year Month Day Hour [hr] Start Time: 0 0 0 0.0000 End Time: 0 0 0 360.0000 Hydrology [sec] Surface Hydraulics [sec] Min Calculation Time:60.0000 0.1000 Max Calculation Time:30.0000 Output Time Increments Hydrology Year Month Day Hour [hr]Time Increment [min] 0 0 0 0.0000 30.0000 Surface Hydraulics Year Month Day Hour [hr]Time Increment [min] 0 0 0 0.0000 30.0000 Restart File Save Restart: False Resources & Lookup Tables Resources Lookup Tables Rainfall Folder:Boundary Stage Set: Extern Hydrograph Set: Unit Hydrograph Folder:Curve Number Set: Green-Ampt Set: Vertical Layers Set: Impervious Set: Tolerances & Options Time Marching: SAOR IA Recovery Time: 24.0000 hr Max Iterations: 6 Over-Relax Weight Fact: 0.5 dec dZ Tolerance: 0.0010 ft Smp/Man Basin Rain Opt: Global Max dZ: 1.0000 ft Link Optimizer Tol: 0.0001 ft Rainfall Name: ~SFWMD-72 Rainfall Amount: 11.50 in 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 815 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) 8 C:\Users\sball\Desktop\Veterans Memorial East of Railroad 3 basin ICPR\11/5/2019 14:17 Edge Length Option: Automatic Storm Duration: 72.0000 hr Dflt Damping (1D): 0.0050 ft Min Node Srf Area (1D): 100 ft2 Energy Switch (1D): Energy Comment: 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 816 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) 1 C:\Users\sball\Desktop\Single Basin\10/3/2019 15:24 Simple Basin: Basin 1 Scenario: Scenario1 Node: Lake 2 Hydrograph Method: NRCS Unit Hydrograph Infiltration Method: Curve Number Time of Concentration: 10.0000 min Max Allowable Q: 0.00 cfs Time Shift: 0.0000 hr Unit Hydrograph: UH256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Area: 9.5700 ac Curve Number: 82.2 % Impervious: 0.00 % DCIA: 0.00 % Direct: 0.00 Rainfall Name: ~SFWMD-72 Comment: Node: Lake 2 Scenario: Scenario1 Type: Stage/Area Base Flow: 0.00 cfs Initial Stage: 9.00 ft Warning Stage: 0.00 ft Stage [ft]Area [ac]Area [ft2] 9.00 2.2000 95832 10.00 2.5900 112820 10.90 2.4200 105415 11.50 2.4900 108464 12.00 2.5000 108900 12.50 4.2700 186001 13.10 9.5700 416869 Comment: Node: Outfall Scenario: Scenario1 Type: Time/Stage Base Flow: 0.00 cfs Initial Stage: 9.00 ft Warning Stage: 0.00 ft Boundary Stage: 1IBTF0WFSBMM*OQVU1BSBNFUFST%SBJOBHF#BTJO 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 817 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) 2 C:\Users\sball\Desktop\Single Basin\10/3/2019 15:24 Year Month Day Hour Stage [ft] 0 0 0 0.0000 7.00 0 0 0 72.0000 9.00 0 0 0 360.0000 7.00 Comment: Drop Structure Link: Interconnect Scenario: Scenario1 From Node: Lake 2 To Node: Outfall Link Count: 1 Flow Direction: Both Solution: Combine Increments: 0 Pipe Count: 1 Damping: 0.0000 ft Length: 27.26 ft FHWA Code: 0 Entr Loss Coef: 0.00 Exit Loss Coef: 0.00 Bend Loss Coef: 0.00 Bend Location: 0.00 ft Energy Switch: Energy Upstream Pipe Downstream Pipe Invert: 9.00 ft Invert: 9.00 ft Manning's N: 0.0120 Manning's N: 0.0120 Geometry: Circular Geometry: Circular Max Depth: 3.00 ft Max Depth: 3.00 ft Bottom Clip Default: 0.00 ft Default: 0.00 ft Op Table:Op Table: Ref Node:Ref Node: Manning's N: 0.0000 Manning's N: 0.0000 Top Clip Default: 0.00 ft Default: 0.00 ft Op Table:Op Table: Ref Node:Ref Node: Manning's N: 0.0000 Manning's N: 0.0000 Pipe Comment: Weir Component Weir: 1 Weir Count: 1 Weir Flow Direction: Both Damping: 0.0000 ft Weir Type: Sharp Crested Vertical Geometry Type: Circular Invert: 9.00 ft Control Elevation: 9.00 ft Max Depth: 0.21 ft Bottom Clip Default: 0.00 ft Op Table: Ref Node: Top Clip Default: 0.00 ft Op Table: Ref Node: Discharge Coefficients Weir Default: 3.200 Weir Table: Orifice Default: 0.600 Orifice Table: Weir Comment: Weir Component Weir: 2 Weir Count: 1 Weir Flow Direction: Both Damping: 0.0000 ft Bottom Clip Default: 0.00 ft Op Table: Ref Node: 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 818 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) 3 C:\Users\sball\Desktop\Single Basin\10/3/2019 15:24 Weir Type: Sharp Crested Vertical Geometry Type: Rectangular Invert: 9.59 ft Control Elevation: 9.00 ft Max Depth: 0.25 ft Max Width: 0.54 ft Fillet: 0.00 ft Top Clip Default: 0.00 ft Op Table: Ref Node: Discharge Coefficients Weir Default: 3.200 Weir Table: Orifice Default: 0.600 Orifice Table: Weir Comment: Drop Structure Comment: Simulation: 25 year 3 day Scenario: Scenario1 Run Date/Time: 9/18/2019 3:13:54 PM Program Version: ICPR4 4.05.02 General Run Mode: Normal Year Month Day Hour [hr] Start Time: 0 0 0 0.0000 End Time: 0 0 0 360.0000 Hydrology [sec] Surface Hydraulics [sec] Min Calculation Time:60.0000 0.1000 Max Calculation Time:30.0000 Output Time Increments Hydrology Year Month Day Hour [hr]Time Increment [min] 0 0 0 0.0000 15.0000 Surface Hydraulics Year Month Day Hour [hr]Time Increment [min] 0 0 0 0.0000 15.0000 Restart File Save Restart: False Resources & Lookup Tables 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 819 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) 4 C:\Users\sball\Desktop\Single Basin\10/3/2019 15:24 Resources Lookup Tables Rainfall Folder:Boundary Stage Set: Extern Hydrograph Set: Unit Hydrograph Folder:Curve Number Set: Green-Ampt Set: Vertical Layers Set: Impervious Set: Tolerances & Options Time Marching: SAOR IA Recovery Time: 24.0000 hr Max Iterations: 6 Over-Relax Weight Fact: 0.5 dec dZ Tolerance: 0.0010 ft Smp/Man Basin Rain Opt: Global Max dZ: 1.0000 ft Link Optimizer Tol: 0.0001 ft Rainfall Name: ~SFWMD-72 Rainfall Amount: 11.50 in Edge Length Option: Automatic Storm Duration: 72.0000 hr Dflt Damping (1D): 0.0050 ft Min Node Srf Area (1D): 100 ft2 Energy Switch (1D): Energy Comment: 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 820 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) 1 C:\Users\sball\Desktop\Veterans Memorial East of Railroad ICPR\11/12/2019 08:33 Simple Basin: Sub-Basin 1 Scenario: Scenario1 Node: Detention 1 Hydrograph Method: NRCS Unit Hydrograph Infiltration Method: Curve Number Time of Concentration: 10.0000 min Max Allowable Q: 0.00 cfs Time Shift: 0.0000 hr Unit Hydrograph: UH256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Area: 5.0600 ac Curve Number: 77.6 % Impervious: 0.00 % DCIA: 0.00 % Direct: 0.00 Rainfall Name: ~SFWMD-72 Comment: Simple Basin: Sub-Basin 2 Scenario: Scenario1 Node: Wet Pond 1 Hydrograph Method: NRCS Unit Hydrograph Infiltration Method: Curve Number Time of Concentration: 10.0000 min Max Allowable Q: 0.00 cfs Time Shift: 0.0000 hr Unit Hydrograph: UH256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Area: 9.3200 ac Curve Number: 87.0 % Impervious: 0.00 % DCIA: 0.00 % Direct: 0.00 Rainfall Name: ~SFWMD-72 Comment: Simple Basin: Sub-Basin 3 Scenario: Scenario1 Node: Detention 2 Hydrograph Method: NRCS Unit Hydrograph Infiltration Method: Curve Number Time of Concentration: 10.0000 min Max Allowable Q: 0.00 cfs 1IBTF0WFSBMM*OQVU1BSBNFUFST%SBJOBHF#BTJO 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 821 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) 2 C:\Users\sball\Desktop\Veterans Memorial East of Railroad ICPR\11/12/2019 08:33 Time Shift: 0.0000 hr Unit Hydrograph: UH256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Area: 17.6300 ac Curve Number: 83.2 % Impervious: 0.00 % DCIA: 0.00 % Direct: 0.00 Rainfall Name: ~SFWMD-72 Comment: Simple Basin: Sub-Basin 4 Scenario: Scenario1 Node: Detention 3 Hydrograph Method: NRCS Unit Hydrograph Infiltration Method: Curve Number Time of Concentration: 10.0000 min Max Allowable Q: 0.00 cfs Time Shift: 0.0000 hr Unit Hydrograph: UH256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Area: 8.7700 ac Curve Number: 77.8 % Impervious: 0.00 % DCIA: 0.00 % Direct: 0.00 Rainfall Name: ~SFWMD-72 Comment: Node: Detention 1 Scenario: Scenario1 Type: Stage/Area Base Flow: 0.00 cfs Initial Stage: 10.50 ft Warning Stage: 0.00 ft Stage [ft]Area [ac]Area [ft2] 10.50 0.0000 0 11.50 0.3900 16988 11.70 0.4500 19602 13.40 0.9800 42689 14.20 3.3100 144184 14.80 5.0600 220414 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 822 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) 3 C:\Users\sball\Desktop\Veterans Memorial East of Railroad ICPR\11/12/2019 08:33 Stage [ft]Area [ac]Area [ft2] 15.60 5.0600 220414 Comment: Node: Detention 2 Scenario: Scenario1 Type: Stage/Area Base Flow: 0.00 cfs Initial Stage: 10.50 ft Warning Stage: 0.00 ft Stage [ft]Area [ac]Area [ft2] 10.50 0.0000 0 11.50 4.4200 192535 11.70 4.5800 199505 13.40 5.9600 259618 14.20 12.6300 550163 14.80 17.6300 767963 15.60 17.6300 767963 Comment: Node: Detention 3 Scenario: Scenario1 Type: Stage/Area Base Flow: 0.00 cfs Initial Stage: 10.50 ft Warning Stage: 0.00 ft Stage [ft]Area [ac]Area [ft2] 10.50 0.0000 0 11.50 2.1300 92783 11.70 2.1800 94961 13.40 2.6200 114127 14.20 2.8300 123275 14.80 5.3800 234353 15.60 8.7700 382021 Comment: Node: Outfall 1 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 823 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) 4 C:\Users\sball\Desktop\Veterans Memorial East of Railroad ICPR\11/12/2019 08:33 Scenario: Scenario1 Type: Time/Stage Base Flow: 0.00 cfs Initial Stage: 6.00 ft Warning Stage: 0.00 ft Boundary Stage: Year Month Day Hour Stage [ft] 0 0 0 0.0000 6.00 0 0 0 72.0000 8.00 0 0 0 360.0000 6.00 Comment: Node: Wet Pond 1 Scenario: Scenario1 Type: Stage/Area Base Flow: 0.00 cfs Initial Stage: 10.50 ft Warning Stage: 0.00 ft Stage [ft]Area [ac]Area [ft2] 10.50 4.2800 186437 11.50 4.5400 197762 11.70 4.5900 199940 13.40 5.0400 219542 14.20 7.4900 326264 14.80 9.3200 405979 15.60 9.3200 405979 Comment: Drop Structure Link: CS-1 Scenario: Scenario1 From Node: Wet Pond 1 To Node: Outfall 1 Link Count: 1 Flow Direction: Both Solution: Combine Increments: 0 Pipe Count: 1 Damping: 0.0000 ft Length: 150.00 ft FHWA Code: 0 Entr Loss Coef: 0.00 Upstream Pipe Downstream Pipe Invert: 8.00 ft Invert: 8.00 ft Manning's N: 0.0120 Manning's N: 0.0120 Geometry: Circular Geometry: Circular Max Depth: 1.50 ft Max Depth: 1.50 ft Bottom Clip Default: 0.00 ft Default: 0.00 ft Op Table:Op Table: Ref Node:Ref Node: Manning's N: 0.0000 Manning's N: 0.0000 Top Clip Default: 0.00 ft Default: 0.00 ft Op Table:Op Table: 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 824 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) 5 C:\Users\sball\Desktop\Veterans Memorial East of Railroad ICPR\11/12/2019 08:33 Exit Loss Coef: 0.00 Bend Loss Coef: 0.00 Bend Location: 0.00 ft Energy Switch: Energy Ref Node:Ref Node: Manning's N: 0.0000 Manning's N: 0.0000 Pipe Comment: Weir Component Weir: 1 Weir Count: 1 Weir Flow Direction: Both Damping: 0.0000 ft Weir Type: Sharp Crested Vertical Geometry Type: Circular Invert: 10.50 ft Control Elevation: 10.50 ft Max Depth: 0.46 ft Bottom Clip Default: 0.00 ft Op Table: Ref Node: Top Clip Default: 0.00 ft Op Table: Ref Node: Discharge Coefficients Weir Default: 3.200 Weir Table: Orifice Default: 0.600 Orifice Table: Weir Comment: Weir Component Weir: 2 Weir Count: 1 Weir Flow Direction: Both Damping: 0.0000 ft Weir Type: Sharp Crested Vertical Geometry Type: Rectangular Invert: 11.71 ft Control Elevation: 10.50 ft Max Depth: 0.50 ft Max Width: 1.50 ft Fillet: 0.00 ft Bottom Clip Default: 0.00 ft Op Table: Ref Node: Top Clip Default: 0.00 ft Op Table: Ref Node: Discharge Coefficients Weir Default: 3.200 Weir Table: Orifice Default: 0.600 Orifice Table: Weir Comment: Drop Structure Comment: Pipe Link: Interconnect 1 Scenario: Scenario1 From Node: Detention 1 To Node: Wet Pond 1 Link Count: 1 Flow Direction: Both Damping: 0.0000 ft Upstream Downstream Invert: 10.80 ft Invert: 10.80 ft Manning's N: 0.0120 Manning's N: 0.0120 Geometry: Circular Geometry: Circular Max Depth: 2.50 ft Max Depth: 2.50 ft Bottom Clip Default: 0.00 ft Default: 0.00 ft 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 825 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) 6 C:\Users\sball\Desktop\Veterans Memorial East of Railroad ICPR\11/12/2019 08:33 Length: 150.00 ft FHWA Code: 0 Entr Loss Coef: 0.00 Exit Loss Coef: 0.00 Bend Loss Coef: 0.00 Bend Location: 0.00 ft Energy Switch: Energy Op Table:Op Table: Ref Node:Ref Node: Manning's N: 0.0000 Manning's N: 0.0000 Top Clip Default: 0.00 ft Default: 0.00 ft Op Table:Op Table: Ref Node:Ref Node: Manning's N: 0.0000 Manning's N: 0.0000 Comment: Pipe Link: Interconnect 2 Scenario: Scenario1 From Node: Wet Pond 1 To Node: Detention 2 Link Count: 1 Flow Direction: Both Damping: 0.0000 ft Length: 20.00 ft FHWA Code: 0 Entr Loss Coef: 0.00 Exit Loss Coef: 0.00 Bend Loss Coef: 0.00 Bend Location: 0.00 ft Energy Switch: Energy Upstream Downstream Invert: 10.80 ft Invert: 10.80 ft Manning's N: 0.0120 Manning's N: 0.0120 Geometry: Circular Geometry: Circular Max Depth: 2.50 ft Max Depth: 2.50 ft Bottom Clip Default: 0.00 ft Default: 0.00 ft Op Table:Op Table: Ref Node:Ref Node: Manning's N: 0.0000 Manning's N: 0.0000 Top Clip Default: 0.00 ft Default: 0.00 ft Op Table:Op Table: Ref Node:Ref Node: Manning's N: 0.0000 Manning's N: 0.0000 Comment: Pipe Link: Interconnect 3 Scenario: Scenario1 From Node: Detention 2 To Node: Detention 3 Link Count: 1 Flow Direction: Both Damping: 0.0000 ft Length: 49.64 ft FHWA Code: 0 Entr Loss Coef: 0.00 Exit Loss Coef: 0.00 Bend Loss Coef: 0.00 Bend Location: 0.00 ft Energy Switch: Energy Upstream Downstream Invert: 10.80 ft Invert: 10.80 ft Manning's N: 0.0120 Manning's N: 0.0120 Geometry: Circular Geometry: Circular Max Depth: 2.50 ft Max Depth: 2.50 ft Bottom Clip Default: 0.00 ft Default: 0.00 ft Op Table:Op Table: Ref Node:Ref Node: Manning's N: 0.0000 Manning's N: 0.0000 Top Clip Default: 0.00 ft Default: 0.00 ft Op Table:Op Table: Ref Node:Ref Node: Manning's N: 0.0000 Manning's N: 0.0000 Comment: 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 826 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) 7 C:\Users\sball\Desktop\Veterans Memorial East of Railroad ICPR\11/12/2019 08:33 Simulation: 100 year 3 day Scenario: Scenario1 Run Date/Time: 9/16/2019 8:19:42 AM Program Version: ICPR4 4.05.02 General Run Mode: Normal Year Month Day Hour [hr] Start Time: 0 0 0 0.0000 End Time: 0 0 0 360.0000 Hydrology [sec] Surface Hydraulics [sec] Min Calculation Time: 60.0000 0.1000 Max Calculation Time:30.0000 Output Time Increments Hydrology Year Month Day Hour [hr]Time Increment [min] 0 0 0 0.0000 15.0000 Surface Hydraulics Year Month Day Hour [hr]Time Increment [min] 0 0 0 0.0000 15.0000 Restart File Save Restart: False Resources & Lookup Tables Resources Lookup Tables Rainfall Folder:Boundary Stage Set: Extern Hydrograph Set: Unit Hydrograph Folder: Curve Number Set: Green-Ampt Set: Vertical Layers Set: Impervious Set: Tolerances & Options Time Marching: SAOR IA Recovery Time: 24.0000 hr Max Iterations: 6 Over-Relax Weight Fact: 0.5 dec dZ Tolerance: 0.0010 ft Smp/Man Basin Rain Global 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 827 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) 8 C:\Users\sball\Desktop\Veterans Memorial East of Railroad ICPR\11/12/2019 08:33 Opt: Max dZ: 1.0000 ft Link Optimizer Tol: 0.0001 ft Rainfall Name: ~SFWMD-72 Rainfall Amount: 15.00 in Edge Length Option: Automatic Storm Duration: 72.0000 hr Dflt Damping (1D): 0.0050 ft Min Node Srf Area (1D): 100 ft2 Energy Switch (1D): Energy Comment: Simulation: 25 year 3 Day Scenario: Scenario1 Run Date/Time: 11/11/2019 7:20:31 AM Program Version: ICPR4 4.05.02 General Run Mode: Normal Year Month Day Hour [hr] Start Time:0 0 0 0.0000 End Time:0 0 0 360.0000 Hydrology [sec] Surface Hydraulics [sec] Min Calculation Time: 60.0000 0.1000 Max Calculation Time:30.0000 Output Time Increments Hydrology Year Month Day Hour [hr]Time Increment [min] 0 0 0 0.0000 30.0000 Surface Hydraulics Year Month Day Hour [hr]Time Increment [min] 0 0 0 0.0000 30.0000 Restart File Save Restart: False Resources & Lookup Tables 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 828 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) 9 C:\Users\sball\Desktop\Veterans Memorial East of Railroad ICPR\11/12/2019 08:33 Resources Lookup Tables Rainfall Folder:Boundary Stage Set: Extern Hydrograph Set: Unit Hydrograph Folder: Curve Number Set: Green-Ampt Set: Vertical Layers Set: Impervious Set: Tolerances & Options Time Marching: SAOR IA Recovery Time: 24.0000 hr Max Iterations: 6 Over-Relax Weight Fact: 0.5 dec dZ Tolerance: 0.0010 ft Smp/Man Basin Rain Opt: Global Max dZ: 1.0000 ft Link Optimizer Tol: 0.0001 ft Rainfall Name: ~SFWMD-72 Rainfall Amount: 11.50 in Edge Length Option: Automatic Storm Duration: 72.0000 hr Dflt Damping (1D): 0.0050 ft Min Node Srf Area (1D): 100 ft2 Energy Switch (1D): Energy Comment: 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 829 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) WĂŐĞͮϯϵ y,//dϭϵ KW/E/KEK&WZK>K^dK&K>>d/KE ^z^dD^/'E>dZEd/s^ 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 830 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) WƌŽũĞĐƚ͗sĞƚĞƌĂŶƐDĞŵŽƌŝĂůŽƵůĞǀĂƌĚ ĂƚĞ͗KĐƚŽďĞƌϮϰ͕ϮϬϭϵ ƐƚŝŵĂƚĞĚǇ͗^ƚĞǀĞŶĂůů ŚĞĐŬĞĚǇ͗<ĞŝƐŚĂtĞƐƚďƌŽŽŬ ^dKZDZ/E'ͲWKEϯ ^Z/Wd/KE hE/d YhEd/dz hE/d K^d dKd> Ͳϭ ϲΖǆϲΖ:ƵŶĐƚŝŽŶŽǆͬ/ŶůĞƚ Ϯ Ψϲ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϭϮ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ͲϮ ϰϮΗZW >& ϱϰϯ ΨϭϱϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϴϭ͕ϰϱϬ͘ϬϬ Ͳϯ ϰϮΗ&^ ϭ Ψϱ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϱ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ͳϰ ϮϰΗZW >& ϴϰ ΨϲϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϱ͕ϬϰϬ͘ϬϬ Ͳϱ ŽŶƚƌŽů^ƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ ϭ Ψϱ͕ϵϱϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϱ͕ϵϱϬ͘ϬϬ ^ƚŽƌŵƌĂŝŶĂŐĞ^ƵďͲdŽƚĂů ΨϭϬϵ͕ϰϰϬ͘ϬϬ ^dKZDZ/E'ͲWKEϰ ^Z/Wd/KE hE/d YhEd/dz hE/d K^d dKd> Ͳϭ ϲΖǆϲΖ:ƵŶĐƚŝŽŶŽǆͬ/ŶůĞƚ Ϯ Ψϲ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϭϮ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ͲϮ ϰϮΗZW >& ϭ͕ϬϳϬ ΨϭϱϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϭϲϬ͕ϱϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ͳϯ ϰϮΗ&^ ϭ Ψϱ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϱ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ͳϰ ϰΖǆϰΖ:ƵŶĐƚŝŽŶŽǆͬ/ŶůĞƚ ϭ Ψϰ͕ϱϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϰ͕ϱϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ͳϱ ϮϰΗZW >& ϱϵϮ ΨϲϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϯϱ͕ϱϮϬ͘ϬϬ Ͳϲ ŽŶƚƌŽů^ƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ ϭ Ψϱ͕ϵϱϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϱ͕ϵϱϬ͘ϬϬ ^ƚŽƌŵƌĂŝŶĂŐĞ^ƵďͲdŽƚĂů ΨϮϮϯ͕ϰϳϬ͘ϬϬ KƵƚĨůŽǁ ^ƚĂƚĞŽĨ&ůŽƌŝĚĂƵƐŝŶĞƐƐĞƌƚŝĨŝĐĂƚĞEŽ͘ͲϬϬϬϳϲϲϯ ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌΖƐKƉŝŶŝŽŶŽĨWƌŽďĂďůĞŽƐƚƐ KƵƚĨůŽǁ /ŶĨůŽǁ /ŶĨůŽǁ <͗ͰϮϬϭϵͰϭϵϬϬϲϮ͘ϬϬ͘ϬϬsĞƚĞƌĂŶƐDĞŵŽƌŝĂůŽƵůĞǀĂƌĚͰϬϬϵWŽŶĚ^ŝƚŝŶŐZĞƉŽƌƚͰYƵĂŶŝƚŝĞƐͰϮϬϭϵͲϭϬͲϮϰKĨĨƐŝƚĞWŽŶĚKW ^ƚŽƌŵƌĂŝŶĂŐĞ ϭͬϮϳͬϮϬϮϬ ϯ͗ϯϬWD 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 831 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) ^dKZDZ/E'ͲWKEϱ ^Z/Wd/KE hE/d YhEd/dz hE/d K^d dKd> Ͳϭ ϲΖǆϲΖ:ƵŶĐƚŝŽŶŽǆͬ/ŶůĞƚ Ϯ Ψϲ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϭϮ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ͲϮ ϰϮΗZW >& ϵϴϱ ΨϭϱϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϭϰϳ͕ϳϱϬ͘ϬϬ Ͳϯ ϰϮΗ&^ ϭ Ψϱ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϱ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ͳϰ ϰΖǆϰΖ:ƵŶĐƚŝŽŶŽǆͬ/ŶůĞƚ ϭ Ψϰ͕ϱϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϰ͕ϱϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ͳϱ ϮϰΗZW >& ϴϭϮ ΨϲϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϰϴ͕ϳϮϬ͘ϬϬ Ͳϲ ŽŶƚƌŽů^ƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ/ŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐ ϭ Ψϰ͕ϱϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϰ͕ϱϬϬ͘ϬϬ ^ƚŽƌŵƌĂŝŶĂŐĞ^ƵďͲdŽƚĂů ΨϮϮϮ͕ϰϳϬ͘ϬϬ /ŶĨůŽǁ KƵƚĨůŽǁ <͗ͰϮϬϭϵͰϭϵϬϬϲϮ͘ϬϬ͘ϬϬsĞƚĞƌĂŶƐDĞŵŽƌŝĂůŽƵůĞǀĂƌĚͰϬϬϵWŽŶĚ^ŝƚŝŶŐZĞƉŽƌƚͰYƵĂŶŝƚŝĞƐͰϮϬϭϵͲϭϬͲϮϰKĨĨƐŝƚĞWŽŶĚKW ^ƚŽƌŵƌĂŝŶĂŐĞ ϭͬϮϳͬϮϬϮϬ ϯ͗ϯϬWD 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 832 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) WĂŐĞͮϰϬ y,//dϮϬ WKE^/d/E'DdZ/y 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 833 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) WŽŶĚ^ŝƚŝŶŐDĂƚƌŝǆ ĂƚĞ͗ ϮͬϳͬϮϬϮϬ /ŵƉĂĐƚ'ƌĂĚĞ͗ ϯͲ,ŝŐŚ/ŵƉĂĐƚ ϮͲDĞĚŝƵŵ/ŵƉĂĐƚ ϭͲ>Žǁ/ŵƉĂĐƚ ϬͲEŽ/ŵƉĂĐƚ >dZEd/s^Z/Wd/KEͬ/^^h^dKKE^/Z WŽŶĚϭ ŽƐƚ /ŵƉĂĐƚ'ƌĂĚĞ ZŝŐŚƚͲŽĨͲtĂǇ;ŽŶŝŶŐ͕WĂƌĐĞůEŽ͕͘ĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ŝƐƐƵĞƐ͕ZĞůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶƐ͕ƵƐŝŶĞƐƐĂŶĚͬŽƌZĞƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĂů /ŵƉĂĐƚƐ͕ĞƚĐ͘Ϳ WĂƌĐĞů/ϬϬϭϱϮϲϬϬϬϬϮ͗KƌŝŐŝŶĂůWĂƌĐĞů^ŝǌĞŝƐϲϬĂĐƌĞƐ͕hƐĂďůĞWŽŶĚ^ŝǌĞŝƐϮ͘ϱĐƌĞƐ͘ ŽŶƐĞƌǀĂƚŝŽŶ>ĂŶĚhƐĞĚĞƐŝŐŶĂƚŝŽŶ͘ŽŶƐĞƌǀĂƚŝŽŶŽůůŝĞƌŽǁŶĞƌ͘Ψϯϳϱ͕ϬϬϬ Ϯ tĞƚůĂŶĚŝŵƉĂĐƚƐ;,ŝŐŚ͕DĞĚŝƵŵŽƌ>ŽǁǀĂůƵĞ͕ DŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶĐŽƐƚƐͿ dŚŝƐĂƌĞĂŚĂƐŶŽƚďĞĞŶĂƐƐĞƐƐĞĚďǇd,ĂƐŝƚǁĂƐŶŽƚŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚŝŶƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚůŝŵŝƚƐ͘ dŚĞƌĞĂƌĞůŝŬĞůǇǁĞƚůĂŶĚƐƚŚĂƚǁŝůůďĞŝŵƉĂĐƚĞĚ͘Ψϭϴϳ͕ϱϬϬ Ϯ WƵďůŝĐ>ĂŶĚƐ dŚŝƐŝƐĐƵƌƌĞŶƚůǇĂĐŽŶƐĞƌǀĂƚŝŽŶĂƌĞĂ͘ Eͬ ϯ tŝůĚůŝĨĞŝŵƉĂĐƚƐ;dŚƌĞĂƚĞŶĞĚ͕ŶĚĂŶŐĞƌĞĚŽƌ ^ŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚ͕DŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶĐŽƐƚƐͿ dŚĞƌĞǁŝůůůŝŬĞůǇďĞŝŵƉĂĐƚƐ͕ďƵƚĂƐƚƵĚǇŚĂƐŶŽƚďĞĞŶĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞĚĨŽƌƚŚŝƐƉĂƌĐĞůĂƐŝƚŝƐ ŽƵƚƐŝĚĞƚŚĞƐƚƵĚǇĂƌĞĂ͘'ŽƉŚĞƌdŽƌƚŽŝƐĞŵĂǇďĞĂŶŝƐƐƵĞ͘ΨϭϬϬ͕ϬϬϬ ϭ ƵůƚƵƌĂůZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐ;ƌĐŚĂĞŽůŽŐŝĐĂů͕ŚŝƐƚŽƌŝĐĂů ƐŝƚĞƐͿ EŽƐƚƵĚǇĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞĚ͘EͬϬ ŽŶƚĂŵŝŶĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚ,ĂǌĂƌĚŽƵƐ ŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐ EŽƚƐƚƵĚŝĞĚĂƐĂƉĂƌƚŽĨƚŚŝƐĞĨĨŽƌƚ͘/ƚŝƐĂŶƵŶĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞĚƉƌŽƉĞƌƚǇ͘tĞĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞ ƚŚĞƌĞǁŝůůďĞŶŽŽŶƐŝƚĞĐŽŶƚĂŵŝŶĂƚŝŽŶ͘EͬϬ ƌĂŝŶĂŐĞŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƐ;ŽƵƚĨĂůůůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶ͕ ƉŝƉŝŶŐŶĞĞĚƐ͕ƉŽŶĚůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶŝŶďĂƐŝŶ͕ĨůŽŽĚƉůĂŝŶ ŝŵƉĂĐƚƐ͕ĞƚĐ͘Ϳ Ϯ͘ϱĂĐƌĞƉŽŶĚŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐϮϬΖŵĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞďĞƌŵ͘&DĨůŽŽĚǌŽŶĞ,ĂŶĚy͕EŽ ŝŵƉĂĐƚƐƚŽĨůŽŽĚƉůĂŝŶĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚ͘ǀĞŶƚƵĂůŽƵƚĨĂůůƚŽŽĐĂŚĂƚĐŚĞĞZŝǀĞƌǀŝĂƌŽĂĚƐŝĚĞ ĐĂŶĂůĂůŽŶŐKůĚh^ϰϭĂƐƚŽĨƚŚĞƐŝƚĞ͘ŽŶŶĞĐƚŝŶŐƚŽƌŽĂĚƐŝĚĞĐĂŶĂůǁŝůůƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĂ ƉŝƉĞĐŽŶŶĞĐƚŝŽŶ͘ŽĞƐŶŽƚƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĂŶŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚǇĨŽƌĨƵƚƵƌĞĞǆƉĂŶƐŝŽŶĨŽƌ ĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚĞǆƚĞŶƐŝŽŶďĞƚǁĞĞŶKůĚh^ϰϭĂŶĚh^ϰϭ͘ ΨϱϬ͕ϬϬϬ ϭ ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶŝƐƐƵĞƐ EŽĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶŝƐƐƵĞƐĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚ͘ Eͬ Ϭ DĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞŝƐƐƵĞƐ dǇƉŝĐĂůƌĞŽĐĐƵƌŝŶŐŵĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞŝƐĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚ͘ŽƐƚŝƐEͬĨŽƌƚǇƉŝĐĂůŵĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞ ĐŽƐƚƐ͘Eͬ Ϭ hƚŝůŝƚǇŝƐƐƵĞƐ EŽƵƚŝůŝƚǇĐŽŶĨůŝĐƚƐǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞƉŽŶĚƐŝƚĞ͘dŚĞƌĞǁŝůůďĞƵƚŝůŝƚǇĐŽŶĨůŝĐƚƐƚŽƌŽƵƚĞ ƐƚŽƌŵǁĂƚĞƌƚŽĂŶĚĨƌŽŵƚŚĞƉŽŶĚƐŝƚĞ͘Eͬ ϭ WƵďůŝĐtĞůů&ŝĞůĚ EŽƉƵďůŝĐǁĞůůĨŝĞůĚƐŝŶĂƌĞĂ͘ Eͬ Ϭ WƵďůŝĐKƉŝŶŝŽŶ;>ŽĐĂƚŝŽŶ͕ĞƐƚŚĞƚŝĐƐͿ WƵďůŝĐŽƉƉŽƐŝƚŝŽŶŝƐĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚĂƐƚŚŝƐŝƐǁŝƚŚŝŶŽŶƐĞƌǀĂƚŝŽŶŽůůŝĞƌůĂŶĚ͘ Eͬ Ϯ dŽƚĂůƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞŽƐƚƐ ΨϳϭϮ͕ϱϬϬ dŽƚĂů^ĐŽƌĞ ϭϮ ZĂŶŬŝŶŐ ϰ ZĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĂƚŝŽŶ ͲEŽŝƐĞĂŶĚĞƐƚŚĞƚŝĐƐǁĞƌĞŶŽƚŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚĂƐƉŽŶĚƐŝƚŝŶŐƐĞůĞĐƚŝŽŶĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ &ĂĐƚŽƌ WƌŽũĞĐƚĞƐĐƌŝƉƚŝŽŶ sĞƚĞƌĂŶƐDĞŵŽƌŝĂůŽƵůĞǀĂƌĚǆƚĞŶƐŝŽŶĨƌŽŵ>ŝǀŝŶŐƐƚŽŶZŽĂĚƚŽKůĚh^ϰϭ WŽŶĚ^ŝƚĞ ϭ ĂƐŝŶĞƐĐƌŝƉƚŝŽŶ ĂƐƚͲtĞƐƚĨƌŽŵĂƉƉƌŽǆŝŵĂƚĞůǇϮϬϬΖĞĂƐƚŽĨƚŚĞ^ĞŵŝŶŽůĞ'ƵůĨZĂŝůƌŽĂĚƚŽƚŚĞ /ŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚŝŽŶǁŝƚŚKůĚh^ϰϭ͘ƉƉƌŽǆŝŵĂƚĞůǇϮ͕ϲϱϬĨƚŽĨĨŽƵƌůĂŶĞŚŝŐŚǁĂǇ͘ 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 834 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) WŽŶĚ^ŝƚŝŶŐDĂƚƌŝǆ ĂƚĞ͗ ϮͬϳͬϮϬϮϬ /ŵƉĂĐƚ'ƌĂĚĞ͗ ϯͲ,ŝŐŚ/ŵƉĂĐƚ ϮͲDĞĚŝƵŵ/ŵƉĂĐƚ ϭͲ>Žǁ/ŵƉĂĐƚ ϬͲEŽ/ŵƉĂĐƚ >dZEd/s^Z/Wd/KEͬ/^^h^dKKE^/Z WŽŶĚϮ ŽƐƚ /ŵƉĂĐƚ'ƌĂĚĞ ZŝŐŚƚͲŽĨͲtĂǇ;ŽŶŝŶŐ͕WĂƌĐĞůEŽ͕͘ĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ŝƐƐƵĞƐ͕ZĞůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶƐ͕ƵƐŝŶĞƐƐĂŶĚͬŽƌZĞƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĂů /ŵƉĂĐƚƐ͕ĞƚĐ͘Ϳ WĂƌĐĞů/ϬϬϭϱϯϭϲϬϬϬϰ͗KƌŝŐŝŶĂůWĂƌĐĞů^ŝǌĞŝƐϳϴ͘ϰϴĂĐƌĞƐ͕hƐĂďůĞWŽŶĚ^ŝǌĞŝƐϮ͘ϱ ĐƌĞƐ͘ǆŝƐƚŝŶŐƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĂůZWhĚĞƐŝŐŶĂƚŝŽŶ͘WƌŝǀĂƚĞŽǁŶĞƌ͘ΨϳϱϬ͕ϬϬϬ Ϯ tĞƚůĂŶĚŝŵƉĂĐƚƐ;,ŝŐŚ͕DĞĚŝƵŵŽƌ>ŽǁǀĂůƵĞ͕ DŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶĐŽƐƚƐͿ dŚŝƐĂƌĞĂŚĂƐŶŽƚďĞĞŶĂƐƐĞƐƐĞĚďǇd,ĂƐŝƚǁĂƐŶŽƚŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚŝŶƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚůŝŵŝƚƐ͘ dŚĞƌĞĂƌĞůŝŬĞůǇǁĞƚůĂŶĚƐƚŚĂƚǁŝůůďĞŝŵƉĂĐƚĞĚ͘Ψϭϵϱ͕ϬϬϬ Ϯ WƵďůŝĐ>ĂŶĚƐ WƵďůŝĐ>ĂŶĚŝŵƉĂĐƚƐĂƌĞŶŽƚĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚ͘ Eͬ ϭ tŝůĚůŝĨĞŝŵƉĂĐƚƐ;dŚƌĞĂƚĞŶĞĚ͕ŶĚĂŶŐĞƌĞĚŽƌ ^ŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚ͕DŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶĐŽƐƚƐͿ dŚĞƌĞǁŝůůůŝŬĞůǇďĞŝŵƉĂĐƚƐ͕ďƵƚĂƐƚƵĚǇŚĂƐŶŽƚďĞĞŶĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞĚĨŽƌƚŚŝƐƉĂƌĐĞůĂƐŝƚŝƐ ŽƵƚƐŝĚĞƚŚĞƐƚƵĚǇĂƌĞĂ͘'ŽƉŚĞƌdŽƌƚŽŝƐĞŵĂǇďĞĂŶŝƐƐƵĞ͘ΨϴϬ͕ϬϬϬ ϭ ƵůƚƵƌĂůZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐ;ƌĐŚĂĞŽůŽŐŝĐĂů͕ŚŝƐƚŽƌŝĐĂů ƐŝƚĞƐͿ EŽƐƚƵĚǇĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞĚ͘EͬϬ ŽŶƚĂŵŝŶĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚ,ĂǌĂƌĚŽƵƐ ŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐ EŽƚƐƚƵĚŝĞĚĂƐĂƉĂƌƚŽĨƚŚŝƐĞĨĨŽƌƚ͘/ƚŝƐĂŶƵŶĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞĚƉƌŽƉĞƌƚǇ͘tĞĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞ ƚŚĞƌĞǁŝůůďĞŶŽŽŶƐŝƚĞĐŽŶƚĂŵŝŶĂƚŝŽŶ͘EͬϬ ƌĂŝŶĂŐĞŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƐ;ŽƵƚĨĂůůůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶ͕ ƉŝƉŝŶŐŶĞĞĚƐ͕ƉŽŶĚůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶŝŶďĂƐŝŶ͕ĨůŽŽĚƉůĂŝŶ ŝŵƉĂĐƚƐ͕ĞƚĐ͘Ϳ Ϯ͘ϱĂĐƌĞƉŽŶĚŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐϮϬΖŵĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞďĞƌŵ͘&DĨůŽŽĚǌŽŶĞ,ĂŶĚy͕EŽ ŝŵƉĂĐƚƐƚŽĨůŽŽĚƉůĂŝŶĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚ͘ǀĞŶƚƵĂůŽƵƚĨĂůůƚŽŽĐĂŚĂƚĐŚĞĞZŝǀĞƌǀŝĂƌŽĂĚƐŝĚĞ ĐĂŶĂůĂůŽŶŐKůĚh^ϰϭĂƐƚŽĨƚŚĞƐŝƚĞ͘ŽŶŶĞĐƚŝŶŐƚŽƌŽĂĚƐŝĚĞĐĂŶĂůǁŝůůƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĂ ƉŝƉĞĐŽŶŶĞĐƚŝŽŶĂŶĚǁŝůůƌĞƋƵŝƌĞƚǁŽƉŝƉĞƐďŽƌĞĚďĞŶĞĂƚŚƚŚĞƌĂŝůƌŽĂĚ͘ŽĞƐŶŽƚ ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĂŶŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚǇĨŽƌĨƵƚƵƌĞĞǆƉĂŶƐŝŽŶĨŽƌĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚĞǆƚĞŶƐŝŽŶďĞƚǁĞĞŶKůĚ h^ϰϭĂŶĚh^ϰϭ͘ ΨϴϬ͕ϬϬϬ ϯ ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶŝƐƐƵĞƐ ŽƌŝŶŐďĞŶĞĂƚŚƚŚĞƌĂŝůƌŽĂĚǁŝůůƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĂůĂƌŐĞƉŝƉĞĂƚŐŽŽĚĚĞƉƚŚ͘WĞƌŵŝƚŝŶŐĨĞĞƐ ŶŽƚŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚ͘ΨϭϱϬ͕ϬϬϬ Ϯ DĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞŝƐƐƵĞƐ dǇƉŝĐĂůƌĞŽĐĐƵƌŝŶŐŵĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞŝƐĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚ͘ŽƐƚŝƐEͬĨŽƌƚǇƉŝĐĂůŵĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞ ĐŽƐƚƐ͘Eͬ Ϭ hƚŝůŝƚǇŝƐƐƵĞƐ EŽƵƚŝůŝƚǇĐŽŶĨůŝĐƚƐǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞƉŽŶĚƐŝƚĞ͘dŚĞƌĞǁŝůůďĞƵƚŝůŝƚǇĐŽŶĨůŝĐƚƐƚŽƌŽƵƚĞ ƐƚŽƌŵǁĂƚĞƌƚŽĂŶĚĨƌŽŵƚŚĞƉŽŶĚƐŝƚĞ͘Eͬ ϭ WƵďůŝĐtĞůů&ŝĞůĚ EŽƉƵďůŝĐǁĞůůĨŝĞůĚƐŝŶĂƌĞĂ͘ Eͬ Ϭ WƵďůŝĐKƉŝŶŝŽŶ;>ŽĐĂƚŝŽŶ͕ĞƐƚŚĞƚŝĐƐͿ DŝŶŝŵĂůƉƵďůŝĐŽƉƉŽƐŝƚŝŽŶŝƐĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚ͘Eͬϭ dŽƚĂůƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞŽƐƚƐ Ψϭ͕Ϯϱϱ͕ϬϬϬ dŽƚĂů^ĐŽƌĞ ϭϯ ZĂŶŬŝŶŐ ϱ ZĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĂƚŝŽŶ ͲEŽŝƐĞĂŶĚĞƐƚŚĞƚŝĐƐǁĞƌĞŶŽƚŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚĂƐƉŽŶĚƐŝƚŝŶŐƐĞůĞĐƚŝŽŶĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ &ĂĐƚŽƌ WƌŽũĞĐƚĞƐĐƌŝƉƚŝŽŶ sĞƚĞƌĂŶƐDĞŵŽƌŝĂůŽƵůĞǀĂƌĚǆƚĞŶƐŝŽŶĨƌŽŵ>ŝǀŝŶŐƐƚŽŶZŽĂĚƚŽKůĚh^ϰϭ WŽŶĚ^ŝƚĞ Ϯ ĂƐŝŶĞƐĐƌŝƉƚŝŽŶ ĂƐƚͲtĞƐƚĨƌŽŵĂƉƉƌŽǆŝŵĂƚĞůǇϮϬϬΖĞĂƐƚŽĨƚŚĞ^ĞŵŝŶŽůĞ'ƵůĨZĂŝůƌŽĂĚƚŽƚŚĞ /ŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚŝŽŶǁŝƚŚKůĚh^ϰϭ͘ƉƉƌŽǆŝŵĂƚĞůǇϮ͕ϲϱϬĨƚŽĨĨŽƵƌůĂŶĞŚŝŐŚǁĂǇ͘ 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 835 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) WŽŶĚ^ŝƚŝŶŐDĂƚƌŝǆ ĂƚĞ͗ ϮͬϳͬϮϬϮϬ /ŵƉĂĐƚ'ƌĂĚĞ͗ ϯͲ,ŝŐŚ/ŵƉĂĐƚ ϮͲDĞĚŝƵŵ/ŵƉĂĐƚ ϭͲ>Žǁ/ŵƉĂĐƚ ϬͲEŽ/ŵƉĂĐƚ >dZEd/s^Z/Wd/KEͬ/^^h^dKKE^/Z WŽŶĚϯ ŽƐƚ /ŵƉĂĐƚ'ƌĂĚĞ ZŝŐŚƚͲŽĨͲtĂǇ;ŽŶŝŶŐ͕WĂƌĐĞůEŽ͕͘ĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ŝƐƐƵĞƐ͕ZĞůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶƐ͕ƵƐŝŶĞƐƐĂŶĚͬŽƌZĞƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĂů /ŵƉĂĐƚƐ͕ĞƚĐ͘Ϳ WĂƌĐĞů/ϬϬϭϱϮϮϰϬϬϬϲ͗KƌŝŐŝŶĂůWĂƌĐĞů^ŝǌĞŝƐϭϴ͘ϴϲĂĐƌĞƐ͕hƐĂďůĞWŽŶĚ^ŝǌĞŝƐϮ͘ϱ ĐƌĞƐ͘ǆŝƐƚŝŶŐWƌĞƐĞƌǀĞ>ĂŶĚhƐĞĚĞƐŝŐŶĂƚŝŽŶ͕ƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚZKtĚĞƐŝŐŶĂƚŝŽŶ͘WĂƌƚŽĨ ƚŚĞĐŽŶƐĞƌǀĂƚŝŽŶĨŽƌƚŚĞdƌŝĂŶŐůĞWĂƌĐĞů͘WƌŝǀĂƚĞŽǁŶĞƌ͘ ΨϵϬϬ͕ϬϬϬ Ϯ tĞƚůĂŶĚŝŵƉĂĐƚƐ;,ŝŐŚ͕DĞĚŝƵŵŽƌ>ŽǁǀĂůƵĞ͕ DŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶĐŽƐƚƐͿ dŚŝƐĂƌĞĂŚĂƐŶŽƚďĞĞŶĂƐƐĞƐƐĞĚďǇd,ĂƐŝƚǁĂƐŶŽƚŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚŝŶƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚůŝŵŝƚƐ͘ dŚĞƌĞĂƌĞůŝŬĞůǇǁĞƚůĂŶĚƐƚŚĂƚǁŝůůďĞŝŵƉĂĐƚĞĚ͘ΨϰϬϬ͕ϬϬϬ Ϯ WƵďůŝĐ>ĂŶĚƐ dŚŝƐŝƐĐƵƌƌĞŶƚůǇĂĐŽŶƐĞƌǀĂƚŝŽŶĂƌĞĂ͘ Eͬ Ϯ tŝůĚůŝĨĞŝŵƉĂĐƚƐ;dŚƌĞĂƚĞŶĞĚ͕ŶĚĂŶŐĞƌĞĚŽƌ ^ŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚ͕DŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶĐŽƐƚƐͿ dŚĞƌĞǁŝůůůŝŬĞůǇďĞŝŵƉĂĐƚƐ͕ďƵƚĂƐƚƵĚǇŚĂƐŶŽƚďĞĞŶĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞĚĨŽƌƚŚŝƐƉĂƌĐĞůĂƐŝƚŝƐ ŽƵƚƐŝĚĞƚŚĞƐƚƵĚǇĂƌĞĂ͘'ŽƉŚĞƌdŽƌƚŽŝƐĞŵĂǇďĞĂŶŝƐƐƵĞ͘ΨϱϬ͕ϬϬϬ ϭ ƵůƚƵƌĂůZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐ;ƌĐŚĂĞŽůŽŐŝĐĂů͕ŚŝƐƚŽƌŝĐĂů ƐŝƚĞƐͿ EŽƐƚƵĚǇĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞĚ͘EͬϬ ŽŶƚĂŵŝŶĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚ,ĂǌĂƌĚŽƵƐ ŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐ EŽƚƐƚƵĚŝĞĚĂƐĂƉĂƌƚŽĨƚŚŝƐĞĨĨŽƌƚ͘/ƚŝƐĂŶƵŶĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞĚƉƌŽƉĞƌƚǇ͘tĞĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞ ƚŚĞƌĞǁŝůůďĞŶŽŽŶƐŝƚĞĐŽŶƚĂŵŝŶĂƚŝŽŶ͘EͬϬ ƌĂŝŶĂŐĞŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƐ;ŽƵƚĨĂůůůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶ͕ ƉŝƉŝŶŐŶĞĞĚƐ͕ƉŽŶĚůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶŝŶďĂƐŝŶ͕ĨůŽŽĚƉůĂŝŶ ŝŵƉĂĐƚƐ͕ĞƚĐ͘Ϳ Ϯ͘ϱĂĐƌĞƉŽŶĚŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐϮϬΖŵĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞďĞƌŵ͘&DĨůŽŽĚǌŽŶĞ,ĂŶĚy͕EŽ ŝŵƉĂĐƚƐƚŽĨůŽŽĚƉůĂŝŶĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚ͘ǀĞŶƚƵĂůŽƵƚĨĂůůƚŽŽĐĂŚĂƚĐŚĞĞZŝǀĞƌǀŝĂƌŽĂĚƐŝĚĞ ĐĂŶĂůĂůŽŶŐKůĚh^ϰϭĂƐƚŽĨƚŚĞƐŝƚĞ͘ŽŶŶĞĐƚŝŶŐƚŽƌŽĂĚƐŝĚĞĐĂŶĂůǁŝůůƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĂ ƉŝƉĞĐŽŶŶĞĐƚŝŽŶĂŶĚŵĂǇƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĂŶĞĂƐĞŵĞŶƚ͘ŽĞƐŶŽƚƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĂŶŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚǇĨŽƌ ĨƵƚƵƌĞĞǆƉĂŶƐŝŽŶĨŽƌĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚĞǆƚĞŶƐŝŽŶďĞƚǁĞĞŶKůĚh^ϰϭĂŶĚh^ϰϭ͘ ΨϭϬϵ͕ϰϰϬ ϭ ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶŝƐƐƵĞƐ EŽĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶŝƐƐƵĞƐĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚ͘EͬϬ DĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞŝƐƐƵĞƐ dǇƉŝĐĂůƌĞŽĐĐƵƌŝŶŐŵĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞŝƐĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚ͘ŽƐƚŝƐEͬĨŽƌƚǇƉŝĐĂůŵĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞ ĐŽƐƚƐ͘EͬϬ hƚŝůŝƚǇŝƐƐƵĞƐ EŽƵƚŝůŝƚǇĐŽŶĨůŝĐƚƐǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞƉŽŶĚƐŝƚĞ͘dŚĞƌĞǁŝůůďĞƵƚŝůŝƚǇĐŽŶĨůŝĐƚƐƚŽƌŽƵƚĞ ƐƚŽƌŵǁĂƚĞƌƚŽĂŶĚĨƌŽŵƚŚĞƉŽŶĚƐŝƚĞ͘Eͬϭ WƵďůŝĐtĞůů&ŝĞůĚ EŽƉƵďůŝĐǁĞůůĨŝĞůĚƐŝŶĂƌĞĂ͘EͬϬ WƵďůŝĐKƉŝŶŝŽŶ;>ŽĐĂƚŝŽŶ͕ĞƐƚŚĞƚŝĐƐͿ WƵďůŝĐŽƉƉŽƐŝƚŝŽŶŝƐĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚĂƐƚŚŝƐŝƐĂƉƌĞƐĞƌǀĞĂŶĚůŝŬĞůǇǁĞƚůĂŶĚƐ͘ Eͬ Ϯ dŽƚĂůƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞŽƐƚƐ Ψϭ͕ϰϱϵ͕ϰϰϬ dŽƚĂů^ĐŽƌĞ ϭϭ ZĂŶŬŝŶŐ ϯ ZĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĂƚŝŽŶ ͲEŽŝƐĞĂŶĚĞƐƚŚĞƚŝĐƐǁĞƌĞŶŽƚŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚĂƐƉŽŶĚƐŝƚŝŶŐƐĞůĞĐƚŝŽŶĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ &ĂĐƚŽƌ WƌŽũĞĐƚĞƐĐƌŝƉƚŝŽŶ sĞƚĞƌĂŶƐDĞŵŽƌŝĂůŽƵůĞǀĂƌĚǆƚĞŶƐŝŽŶĨƌŽŵ>ŝǀŝŶŐƐƚŽŶZŽĂĚƚŽKůĚh^ϰϭ WŽŶĚ^ŝƚĞ ϯ ĂƐŝŶĞƐĐƌŝƉƚŝŽŶ ĂƐƚͲtĞƐƚĨƌŽŵĂƉƉƌŽǆŝŵĂƚĞůǇϮϬϬΖĞĂƐƚŽĨƚŚĞ^ĞŵŝŶŽůĞ'ƵůĨZĂŝůƌŽĂĚƚŽƚŚĞ /ŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚŝŽŶǁŝƚŚKůĚh^ϰϭ͘ƉƉƌŽǆŝŵĂƚĞůǇϮ͕ϲϱϬĨƚŽĨĨŽƵƌůĂŶĞŚŝŐŚǁĂǇ͘ 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 836 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) WŽŶĚ^ŝƚŝŶŐDĂƚƌŝǆ ĂƚĞ͗ ϮͬϳͬϮϬϮϬ /ŵƉĂĐƚ 'ƌĂĚĞ͗ϯͲ,ŝŐŚ/ŵƉĂĐƚ ϮͲDĞĚŝƵŵ/ŵƉĂĐƚ ϭͲ>Žǁ/ŵƉĂĐƚ ϬͲEŽ/ŵƉĂĐƚ >dZEd/s^Z/Wd/KEͬ/^^h^dKKE^/Z WŽŶĚϰ ŽƐƚ /ŵƉĂĐƚ'ƌĂĚĞ ZŝŐŚƚͲŽĨͲtĂǇ;ŽŶŝŶŐ͕WĂƌĐĞůEŽ͕͘ĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ŝƐƐƵĞƐ͕ZĞůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶƐ͕ƵƐŝŶĞƐƐĂŶĚͬŽƌZĞƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĂů /ŵƉĂĐƚƐ͕ĞƚĐ͘Ϳ WĂƌĐĞů/ϬϬϭϱϮϮϰϬϬϬϲ͗KƌŝŐŝŶĂůWĂƌĐĞů^ŝǌĞŝƐϯ͘ϴϯĂĐƌĞƐ͕hƐĂďůĞWŽŶĚ^ŝǌĞŝƐϮ͘ϱ ĐƌĞƐ͘ǆŝƐƚŝŶŐWƌĞƐĞƌǀĞ>ĂŶĚhƐĞĚĞƐŝŐŶĂƚŝŽŶ͕ƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚZKtĚĞƐŝŐŶĂƚŝŽŶ͘WĂƌƚŽĨ ƚŚĞƉƌĞƐĞƌǀĞĨŽƌƚŚĞdƵƌƚůĞƌĞĞŬWh͘ůƌĞĂĚǇŶĞĞĚZKtƚĂŬĞŽŶƚŚŝƐƉĂƌĐĞůĨŽƌ ƌŽĂĚǁĂǇŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐ͘WƌŝǀĂƚĞŽǁŶĞƌ͘ ΨϱϬϬ͕ϬϬϬ ϭ tĞƚůĂŶĚŝŵƉĂĐƚƐ;,ŝŐŚ͕DĞĚŝƵŵŽƌ>ŽǁǀĂůƵĞ͕ DŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶĐŽƐƚƐͿ dŚŝƐĂƌĞĂŚĂƐŶŽƚďĞĞŶĂƐƐĞƐƐĞĚďǇd,ĂƐŝƚǁĂƐŶŽƚŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚŝŶƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚůŝŵŝƚƐ͘ dŚĞƌĞĂƌĞůŝŬĞůǇǁĞƚůĂŶĚƐƚŚĂƚǁŝůůďĞŝŵƉĂĐƚĞĚ͘ΨϯϱϬ͕ϬϬϬ Ϯ WƵďůŝĐ>ĂŶĚƐ dŚŝƐŝƐĐƵƌƌĞŶƚůǇĂƉƌĞƐĞƌǀĞĂƌĞĂ͘ Eͬ Ϯ tŝůĚůŝĨĞŝŵƉĂĐƚƐ;dŚƌĞĂƚĞŶĞĚ͕ŶĚĂŶŐĞƌĞĚŽƌ ^ŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚ͕DŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶĐŽƐƚƐͿ dŚĞƌĞǁŝůůůŝŬĞůǇďĞŝŵƉĂĐƚƐ͕ďƵƚĂƐƚƵĚǇŚĂƐŶŽƚďĞĞŶĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞĚĨŽƌƚŚŝƐƉĂƌĐĞůĂƐŝƚ ŝƐŽƵƚƐŝĚĞƚŚĞƐƚƵĚǇĂƌĞĂ͘'ŽƉŚĞƌdŽƌƚŽŝƐĞŵĂǇďĞĂŶŝƐƐƵĞ͘ΨϱϬ͕ϬϬϬ ϭ ƵůƚƵƌĂůZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐ;ƌĐŚĂĞŽůŽŐŝĐĂů͕ŚŝƐƚŽƌŝĐĂů ƐŝƚĞƐͿ EŽƐƚƵĚǇĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞĚ͘EͬϬ ŽŶƚĂŵŝŶĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚ,ĂǌĂƌĚŽƵƐ ŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐ EŽƚƐƚƵĚŝĞĚĂƐĂƉĂƌƚŽĨƚŚŝƐĞĨĨŽƌƚ͘/ƚŝƐĂŶƵŶĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞĚƉƌŽƉĞƌƚǇ͘tĞĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞ ƚŚĞƌĞǁŝůůďĞŶŽŽŶƐŝƚĞĐŽŶƚĂŵŝŶĂƚŝŽŶ͘ΨϬ Ϭ ƌĂŝŶĂŐĞŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƐ;ŽƵƚĨĂůůůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶ͕ ƉŝƉŝŶŐŶĞĞĚƐ͕ƉŽŶĚůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶŝŶďĂƐŝŶ͕ĨůŽŽĚƉůĂŝŶ ŝŵƉĂĐƚƐ͕ĞƚĐ͘Ϳ Ϯ͘ϱĂĐƌĞƉŽŶĚŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐϮϬΖŵĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞďĞƌŵ͘&DĨůŽŽĚǌŽŶĞ,ĂŶĚy͕EŽ ŝŵƉĂĐƚƐƚŽĨůŽŽĚƉůĂŝŶĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚ͘ǀĞŶƚƵĂůŽƵƚĨĂůůƚŽŽĐĂŚĂƚĐŚĞĞZŝǀĞƌǀŝĂ ƌŽĂĚƐŝĚĞĐĂŶĂůĂůŽŶŐKůĚh^ϰϭĂƐƚŽĨƚŚĞƐŝƚĞ͘ŽŶŶĞĐƚŝŶŐƚŽƌŽĂĚƐŝĚĞĐĂŶĂůǁŝůů ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĂƉŝƉĞĐŽŶŶĞĐƚŝŽŶĂŶĚŵĂǇƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĂŶĞĂƐĞŵĞŶƚ͘WƌŽǀŝĚĞƐŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚǇĨŽƌ ĨƵƚƵƌĞĞǆƉĂŶƐŝŽŶĨŽƌĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚĞǆƚĞŶƐŝŽŶďĞƚǁĞĞŶKůĚh^ϰϭĂŶĚh^ϰϭ͘ ΨϮϮϯ͕ϰϳϬ ϭ ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶŝƐƐƵĞƐ EŽĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶŝƐƐƵĞƐĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚ͘ Eͬ Ϭ DĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞŝƐƐƵĞƐ dǇƉŝĐĂůƌĞŽĐĐƵƌŝŶŐŵĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞŝƐĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚ͘ŽƐƚŝƐEͬĨŽƌƚǇƉŝĐĂůŵĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞ ĐŽƐƚƐ͘Eͬ Ϭ hƚŝůŝƚǇŝƐƐƵĞƐ EŽƵƚŝůŝƚǇĐŽŶĨůŝĐƚƐǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞƉŽŶĚƐŝƚĞ͘dŚĞƌĞǁŝůůďĞƵƚŝůŝƚǇĐŽŶĨůŝĐƚƐƚŽƌŽƵƚĞ ƐƚŽƌŵǁĂƚĞƌƚŽĂŶĚĨƌŽŵƚŚĞƉŽŶĚƐŝƚĞ͘Eͬ ϭ WƵďůŝĐtĞůů&ŝĞůĚ EŽƉƵďůŝĐǁĞůůĨŝĞůĚƐŝŶĂƌĞĂ͘ Eͬ Ϭ WƵďůŝĐKƉŝŶŝŽŶ;>ŽĐĂƚŝŽŶ͕ĞƐƚŚĞƚŝĐƐͿ WƵďůŝĐŽƉƉŽƐŝƚŝŽŶŝƐĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚĂƐƚŚŝƐŝƐĂƉƌĞƐĞƌǀĞĂŶĚůŝŬĞůǇǁĞƚůĂŶĚƐ͘ Eͬ Ϯ dŽƚĂůƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞŽƐƚƐ Ψϭ͕ϭϮϯ͕ϰϳϬ dŽƚĂů^ĐŽƌĞ ϭϬ ZĂŶŬŝŶŐ Ϯ ZĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĂƚŝŽŶ ͲEŽŝƐĞĂŶĚĞƐƚŚĞƚŝĐƐǁĞƌĞŶŽƚŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚĂƐƉŽŶĚƐŝƚŝŶŐƐĞůĞĐƚŝŽŶĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ &ĂĐƚŽƌ WƌŽũĞĐƚĞƐĐƌŝƉƚŝŽŶ sĞƚĞƌĂŶƐDĞŵŽƌŝĂůŽƵůĞǀĂƌĚǆƚĞŶƐŝŽŶĨƌŽŵ>ŝǀŝŶŐƐƚŽŶZŽĂĚƚŽKůĚh^ϰϭ WŽŶĚ^ŝƚĞ ϰ ĂƐŝŶĞƐĐƌŝƉƚŝŽŶ ĂƐƚͲtĞƐƚĨƌŽŵĂƉƉƌŽǆŝŵĂƚĞůǇϮϬϬΖĞĂƐƚŽĨƚŚĞ^ĞŵŝŶŽůĞ'ƵůĨZĂŝůƌŽĂĚƚŽƚŚĞ /ŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚŝŽŶǁŝƚŚKůĚh^ϰϭ͘ƉƉƌŽǆŝŵĂƚĞůǇϮ͕ϲϱϬĨƚŽĨĨŽƵƌůĂŶĞŚŝŐŚǁĂǇ͘ 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 837 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) WŽŶĚ^ŝƚŝŶŐDĂƚƌŝǆ ĂƚĞ͗ ϮͬϳͬϮϬϮϬ /ŵƉĂĐƚ'ƌĂĚĞ͗ ϯͲ,ŝŐŚ/ŵƉĂĐƚ ϮͲDĞĚŝƵŵ/ŵƉĂĐƚ ϭͲ>Žǁ/ŵƉĂĐƚ ϬͲEŽ/ŵƉĂĐƚ >dZEd/s^Z/Wd/KEͬ/^^h^dKKE^/Z WŽŶĚϱ ŽƐƚ /ŵƉĂĐƚ'ƌĂĚĞ ZŝŐŚƚͲŽĨͲtĂǇ;ŽŶŝŶŐ͕WĂƌĐĞůEŽ͕͘ĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ŝƐƐƵĞƐ͕ZĞůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶƐ͕ƵƐŝŶĞƐƐĂŶĚͬŽƌZĞƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĂů /ŵƉĂĐƚƐ͕ĞƚĐ͘Ϳ WĂƌĐĞů/ϬϬϭϱϰϲϬϬϬϬϬ͗KƌŝŐŝŶĂůWĂƌĐĞů^ŝǌĞŝƐϮ͘ϯϵĂĐƌĞƐ͕hƐĂďůĞWŽŶĚ^ŝǌĞŝƐϮ͘ϱϬ ĐƌĞƐ͘ǆŝƐƚŝŶŐŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂů>ĂŶĚhƐĞĚĞƐŝŐŶĂƚŝŽŶƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚZKtĚĞƐŝŐŶĂƚŝŽŶ͘ ůƌĞĂĚǇŵĂǇŶĞĞĚZKtƚĂŬĞĨŽƌƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚƌŽĂĚǁĂǇŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐ͘WƌŝǀĂƚĞŽǁŶĞƌ͘ ΨϮ͕ϭϬϴ͕ϯϬϰ ϯ tĞƚůĂŶĚŝŵƉĂĐƚƐ;,ŝŐŚ͕DĞĚŝƵŵŽƌ>ŽǁǀĂůƵĞ͕ DŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶĐŽƐƚƐͿ dŚŝƐĂƌĞĂŚĂƐŶŽƚďĞĞŶĂƐƐĞƐƐĞĚďǇd,ĂƐŝƚǁĂƐŶŽƚŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚŝŶƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚůŝŵŝƚƐ͘ ĂƐĞĚŽŶĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚZWĚĂƚĂ͕ƚŚŝƐǁŝůůůŝŬĞůǇďĞĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĞĚƵƉůĂŶĚƐ͘ΨϬ Ϭ WƵďůŝĐ>ĂŶĚƐ WƵďůŝĐ>ĂŶĚŝŵƉĂĐƚƐĂƌĞŶŽƚĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚ͘ Eͬ Ϭ tŝůĚůŝĨĞŝŵƉĂĐƚƐ;dŚƌĞĂƚĞŶĞĚ͕ŶĚĂŶŐĞƌĞĚŽƌ ^ŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚ͕DŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶĐŽƐƚƐͿ EŽŝŵƉĂĐƚƐĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚ EͬϬ ƵůƚƵƌĂůZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐ;ƌĐŚĂĞŽůŽŐŝĐĂů͕ŚŝƐƚŽƌŝĐĂů ƐŝƚĞƐͿ EŽƉƌĞǀŝŽƵƐůǇƌĞĐŽƌĚĞĚƵůƚƵƌĂůZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐ͘EͬϬ ŽŶƚĂŵŝŶĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚ,ĂǌĂƌĚŽƵƐ ŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐ EŽƚƐƚƵĚŝĞĚĂƐĂƉĂƌƚŽĨƚŚŝƐĞĨĨŽƌƚ͘/ƚŝƐĂŶƵŶĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞĚƉƌŽƉĞƌƚǇ͘tĞĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞ ƚŚĞƌĞǁŝůůďĞŶŽŽŶƐŝƚĞĐŽŶƚĂŵŝŶĂƚŝŽŶ͘ΨϬ Ϭ ƌĂŝŶĂŐĞŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƐ;ŽƵƚĨĂůůůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶ͕ ƉŝƉŝŶŐŶĞĞĚƐ͕ƉŽŶĚůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶŝŶďĂƐŝŶ͕ĨůŽŽĚƉůĂŝŶ ŝŵƉĂĐƚƐ͕ĞƚĐ͘Ϳ Ϯ͘ϱĂĐƌĞƉŽŶĚŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐϮϬΖŵĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞďĞƌŵ͘dŚŝƐǁŽƵůĚƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĂŶĞĂƐĞŵĞŶƚĨƌŽŵ ƚŚĞdƌŝĂŶŐůĞWĂƌĐĞůĂƐƚŚĞůĂŬĞǁŽƵůĚŶĞĞĚƚŽďĞƚŝĞĚŝŶƚŽƚŚĞŝƌůĂŬĞƚŽŽďƚĂŝŶƚŚĞϮ͘ϱ ĂĐƌĞƐƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚ͘>ŝŬĞůǇƚŽŽƐŵĂůůƚŽďĞƚŚĞƐŽůĞƉŽŶĚƐŝƚĞůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶ͘&DĨůŽŽĚǌŽŶĞ, ĂŶĚy͕EŽŝŵƉĂĐƚƐƚŽĨůŽŽĚƉůĂŝŶĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚ͘ǀĞŶƚƵĂůŽƵƚĨĂůůƚŽŽĐĂŚĂƚĐŚĞĞZŝǀĞƌ ǀŝĂƌŽĂĚƐŝĚĞĐĂŶĂůĂůŽŶŐKůĚh^ϰϭĂƐƚŽĨƚŚĞƐŝƚĞ͘ŽŶŶĞĐƚŝŶŐƚŽƌŽĂĚƐŝĚĞĐĂŶĂůǁŝůů ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĂƉŝƉĞĐŽŶŶĞĐƚŝŽŶĂŶĚŵĂǇƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĂŶĞĂƐĞŵĞŶƚ͘WŽŶĚŵĂǇŶŽƚůĂƌŐĞ ĞŶŽƵŐŚƚŽďĞĂƐƚĂŶĚĂůŽŶĞWŽŶĚ͕ŵĂǇƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůƉŽŶĚĂƌĞĂĞůƐĞǁŚĞƌĞ͘ ΨϮϮϮ͕ϰϳϬ Ϯ ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶŝƐƐƵĞƐ EŽĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶŝƐƐƵĞƐĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚ͘ Eͬ Ϭ DĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞŝƐƐƵĞƐ dǇƉŝĐĂůƌĞŽĐĐƵƌŝŶŐŵĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞŝƐĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚ͘ŽƐƚŝƐEͬĨŽƌƚǇƉŝĐĂůŵĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞ ĐŽƐƚƐ͘Eͬ Ϭ hƚŝůŝƚǇŝƐƐƵĞƐ EŽƵƚŝůŝƚǇĐŽŶĨůŝĐƚƐǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞƉŽŶĚƐŝƚĞ͘dŚĞƌĞǁŝůůďĞƵƚŝůŝƚǇĐŽŶĨůŝĐƚƐƚŽƌŽƵƚĞ ƐƚŽƌŵǁĂƚĞƌƚŽĂŶĚĨƌŽŵƚŚĞƉŽŶĚƐŝƚĞ͘Eͬ ϭ WƵďůŝĐtĞůů&ŝĞůĚ EŽƉƵďůŝĐǁĞůůĨŝĞůĚƐŝŶĂƌĞĂ͘ Eͬ Ϭ WƵďůŝĐKƉŝŶŝŽŶ;>ŽĐĂƚŝŽŶ͕ĞƐƚŚĞƚŝĐƐͿ WƵďůŝĐŽƉƉŽƐŝƚŝŽŶŝƐŶŽƚĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚ͘EͬϬ dŽƚĂůƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞŽƐƚƐ ΨϮ͕ϯϯϬ͕ϳϳϰ dŽƚĂů^ĐŽƌĞ ϲ ZĂŶŬŝŶŐ ϭ ZĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĂƚŝŽŶ ͲEŽŝƐĞĂŶĚĞƐƚŚĞƚŝĐƐǁĞƌĞŶŽƚŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚĂƐƉŽŶĚƐŝƚŝŶŐƐĞůĞĐƚŝŽŶĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ &ĂĐƚŽƌ WƌŽũĞĐƚĞƐĐƌŝƉƚŝŽŶ sĞƚĞƌĂŶƐDĞŵŽƌŝĂůŽƵůĞǀĂƌĚǆƚĞŶƐŝŽŶĨƌŽŵ>ŝǀŝŶŐƐƚŽŶZŽĂĚƚŽKůĚh^ϰϭ WŽŶĚ^ŝƚĞ ϱ ĂƐŝŶĞƐĐƌŝƉƚŝŽŶ ĂƐƚͲtĞƐƚĨƌŽŵĂƉƉƌŽǆŝŵĂƚĞůǇϮϬϬΖĞĂƐƚŽĨƚŚĞ^ĞŵŝŶŽůĞ'ƵůĨZĂŝůƌŽĂĚƚŽƚŚĞ /ŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚŝŽŶǁŝƚŚKůĚh^ϰϭ͘ƉƉƌŽǆŝŵĂƚĞůǇϮ͕ϲϱϬĨƚŽĨĨŽƵƌůĂŶĞŚŝŐŚǁĂǇ͘ 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 838 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) WĂŐĞͮϰϭ y,//dϮϭ W,^KE:hZ/^/d/KE>dZD/Ed/KE ^hD/dddKd,h^K 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 839 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Page 1 of 2 TURRELL, HALL & ASSOCIATES, INC. MARINE & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING 3584 Exchange Avenue, Suite B x Naples, Florida 34104-3732 x (239) 643-0166 x Fax (239) 643-6632 October 15, 2019 Robert Tewis Project Manager U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Fort Myers Regulatory Office 1520 Royal Palm Square Boulevard, Suite 310 Fort Myers, Florida 33919 RE: Project: Veterans Memorial Blvd. Extension County: Collier Robert, Please accept the enclosed jurisdictional determination form for the proposed Veterans Memorial Blvd extension. As discussed during our July 30, 2019 pre-application meeting, Collier County is pursuing approvals to construct the extension of this roadway from its existing terminus through to Old US 41. They need to construct the roadway segment to the Collier County school site as soon as possible so that the School Board can start construction on their new high school. Since the County does not yet have permission from the railroad to cross their right-of-way with the road, the decision was made to split the proposed roadway into two segments. The first segment from the existing terminus to the school site is the subject of this application. It is our belief that this portion of the roadway would not require USACE permitting due to the isolated nature of the three small wetland areas located within the roadway corridor. They are not directly connected to any waters of the US. Tracing flows with respect to determining if a significant nexus to a Traditional Navigable Waterway (TNW) exists, we note that there is a shallow drainage swale located immediately to the south of the roadway corridor. The swale is separated from the corridor by a small berm. The swale is mowed throughout the year and appears to only hold water after heavy rains at the height of the rainy season. The swale also appears to have been dug from uplands. Following this swale to the east it eventually outfalls into a drainage ditch that flows south to a tributary of the Cocohatchee River. We have enclosed an exhibit depicting this described route. We believe that this drainage swale, due to the lack of wetland vegetation within it, lack of long-term water storage or flow, and separation via the berm between it and the wetland areas, does not meet the criteria for a Relatively Permanent Waterway (RPW) and therefore does not provide a nexus between the wetlands within the roadway corridor and any TNW. Since the wetland areas do not have a significant nexus to a TNW, we believe that they are isolated in nature and 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 840 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Page 2 of 2 not subject to USACE jurisdiction. We would like to verify this position with USACE and would request a “No Permit Required” letter from your office should you agree with this determination. To that end, please find enclosed a jurisdictional request form, soil data sheets, photographs of the soil profiles dug from the site, photographs of the representative habitats, and aerial exhibits depicting the project boundaries, vegetative habitats, and soils for the proposed project area. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any additional questions or comments regarding this submittal. Sincerely, Timothy Hall 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 841 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM U.S. Army Corps of Engineers This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook. SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD): 09/18/2019 B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Fort Myers Office of the Jacksonville District, Veterans Memorial Boulevard Extension (No number yet). C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: State: Florida County/parish/borough: Collier City: Naples Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 26.298327° N, Long. 81.787856° W. Universal Transverse Mercator: Name of nearest waterbody: Unnamed conveyance ditch Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows: Cocohatchee River. Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): Big Cypress Swamp 03090204 Check if map/diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request. Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc…) are associated with this action and are recorded on a different JD form. D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY): Office (Desk) Determination. Date: Field Determination. Date(s): 07/17/2019 & 9/17/2019 SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION. There Are no “navigable waters of the U.S.” within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the review area. [Required] Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide. Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce. Explain: . B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION. There Are no “waters of the U.S.” within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required] 1. Waters of the U.S. a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): 1 TNWs, including territorial seas Wetlands adjacent to TNWs Relatively permanent waters2 (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs Non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs Impoundments of jurisdictional waters Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area: Non-wetland waters: linear feet: width (ft) and/or acres. Wetlands: acres. c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: Not Applicable. Elevation of established OHWM (if known): . 2. Non-regulated waters/wetlands (check if applicable):3 Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional. Explain: Areas which meet the definition of a wetland in terms of hydrology, hydric soils and hydrophytic vegetation total 1.07 acres, but are separated by a berm from a grassed swale dug from uplands that is only partially inundated in 1 Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below. 2 For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year-round or has continuous flow at least “seasonally” (e.g., typically 3 months). 3 Supporting documentation is presented in Section III.F. 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 842 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) the wet season. The wetland areas therefore do not have any physical or biological connection to waters of the U.S. This swale eventually runs into a conveyance ditch that would be likely be considered RPW. 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 843 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete Section III.A.1 and Section III.D.1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.1 and 2 and Section III.D.1.; otherwise, see Section III.B below. 1. TNW Identify TNW: . Summarize rationale supporting determination: . 2. Wetland adjacent to TNW Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is “adjacent”: . B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY): This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met. The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non-navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are “relatively permanent waters” (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year-round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3 months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year-round (perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow, skip to Section III.D.4. A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law. If the waterbody4 is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.1 for the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III.C below. 1. Characteristics of non-TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW (i) General Area Conditions: Watershed size: Pick List Drainage area: Pick List Average annual rainfall: inches Average annual snowfall: inches (ii) Physical Characteristics: (a) Relationship with TNW: Tributary flows directly into TNW. Tributary flows through Pick List tributaries before entering TNW. Project waters are Pick List river miles from TNW. Project waters are Pick List river miles from RPW. Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW. Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from RPW. Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain: . Identify flow route to TNW5: . Tributary stream order, if known: . 4 Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the arid West. 5 Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW. 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 844 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) (b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply): Tributary is: Natural Artificial (man-made). Explain: . Manipulated (man-altered). Explain: . Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate): Average width: feet Average depth: feet Average side slopes: Pick List. Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply): Silts Sands Concrete Cobbles Gravel Muck Bedrock Vegetation. Type/% cover: Other. Explain: . Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain: . Presence of run/riffle/pool complexes. Explain: . Tributary geometry: Pick List Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): % (c) Flow: Tributary provides for: Pick List Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year: Pick List Describe flow regime: . Other information on duration and volume: . Surface flow is: Pick List. Characteristics: . Subsurface flow: Pick List. Explain findings: . Dye (or other) test performed: . Tributary has (check all that apply): Bed and banks OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply): clear, natural line impressed on the bank the presence of litter and debris changes in the character of soil destruction of terrestrial vegetation shelving the presence of wrack line vegetation matted down, bent, or absent sediment sorting leaf litter disturbed or washed away scour sediment deposition multiple observed or predicted flow events water staining abrupt change in plant community other (list): Discontinuous OHWM.7 Explain:. If factors other than the OHWM were used to determine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply): High Tide Line indicated by: Mean High Water Mark indicated by: oil or scum line along shore objects survey to available datum; fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore) physical markings; physical markings/characteristics vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types. tidal gauges other (list): (iii) Chemical Characteristics: Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.). Explain: . Identify specific pollutants, if known: . 6A natural or man-made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody’s flow regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break. 7Ibid. 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 845 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) (iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply): Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width): . Wetland fringe. Characteristics: . Habitat for: Federally Listed species. Explain findings: . Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings: . Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings: . Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings: . 2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non-TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW (i) Physical Characteristics: (a) General Wetland Characteristics: Properties: Wetland size:1.07 acres Wetland type. Explain:Depressional cypress. Wetland quality. Explain: Low due to isolation and surrounding development.. Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain: N/A. (b) General Flow Relationship with Non-TNW: Flow is: Perennial flow. Explain: Water can flow to adjacent swale if it gets high enough to overtop berm separating them. Surface flow is: Not present Characteristics: . Subsurface flow: Unknown. Explain findings: . Dye (or other) test performed: . (c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non-TNW: Directly abutting Not directly abutting Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain: . Ecological connection. Explain: . Separated by berm/barrier. Explain: Berm located between wetland and swale.. (d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW Project wetlands are 2-5 river miles from TNW. Project waters are 1-2 aerial (straight) miles from TNW. Flow is from: Wetland to navigable waters. Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the 10 - 20-year floodplain. (ii) Chemical Characteristics: Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed characteristics; etc.). Explain: Surrounded by upland, water is tannin stained and contained within wetland. No external flow.. Identify specific pollutants, if known: . (iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply): Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width): . Vegetation type/percent cover. Explain:Wetland vegetation present approximately 75-80% coverage. Mostly exotic vegetation. Habitat for: Federally Listed species. Explain findings: . Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings: . Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings: . Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings: . 3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any) All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: Pick List Approximately ( 1.07 ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis. 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 846 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) For each wetland, specify the following: Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres) N 1.07 Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed: . C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW. Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus. Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example: x Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW? x Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW? x Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that support downstream foodwebs? x Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or biological integrity of the TNW? Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented below: 1. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D: . 2. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non-RPW flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D: Wetlands separated from drainage swale dug from uplands, by a berm. Swale is a non- RPW which outfalls into a ditch that eventually flows into the Cocohatchee River. There is no significant nexus between the wetlands and the TNW. 3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D: . D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY): 1. TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area: TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres. Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres. 2. RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs. Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year-round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that tributary is perennial: . Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow “seasonally” (e.g., typically three months each year) are jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows seasonally: . 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 847 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply): Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft). Other non-wetland waters: acres. Identify type(s) of waters: . 3. Non-RPWs8 that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs. Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C. Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply): Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft). Other non-wetland waters: acres. Identify type(s) of waters: . 4. Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs. Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands. Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year-round. Provide data and rationale indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly abutting an RPW: . Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow “seasonally.” Provide data indicating that tributary is seasonal in Section III.B and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly abutting an RPW: . Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres. 5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs. Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C. Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres. 6. Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs. Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C. Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres. 7. Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.9 As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional. Demonstrate that impoundment was created from “waters of the U.S.,” or Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1-6), or Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below). E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA-STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE, DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):10 which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes. from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce. which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce. Interstate isolated waters. Explain: . Other factors. Explain: . 8See Footnote # 3. 9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III.D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook. 10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos. 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 848 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination: . Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply): Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft). Other non-wetland waters: acres. Identify type(s) of waters: . Wetlands: acres. F. NON-JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY): If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements. Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce. Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in “SWANCC,” the review area would have been regulated based solely on the “Migratory Bird Rule” (MBR). Waters do not meet the “Significant Nexus” standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain: . Other: (explain, if not covered above): . Provide acreage estimates for non-jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional judgment (check all that apply): Non-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft). Lakes/ponds: acres. Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource: . Wetlands: acres. Provide acreage estimates for non-jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the “Significant Nexus” standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply): Non-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft). Lakes/ponds: acres. Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource: . Wetlands: 1.07 acres. SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES. A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below): Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant: Location, Soils, FLUCFCS, Overview of Nearby Waterways. Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant. Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report. Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Data sheets prepared by the Corps: . Corps navigable waters’ study: . U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: . USGS NHD data. USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps. U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: . USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Collier County Mapping Unit 14- Pineda Fine Sand, Limestone Substratum. National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: . State/Local wetland inventory map(s): . FEMA/FIRM maps: . 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929) Photographs: Aerial (Name & Date): Collier County 2019. or Other (Name & Date): . Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter: . Applicable/supporting case law: . Applicable/supporting scientific literature: . Other information (please specify):FLUCFCS Map. 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 849 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD: Attached Maps, Data Sheets and photos of soil plugs. 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 850 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (B5) Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Veterans Memorial Blvd Extension Naples, Collier County 7/17/2019 Collier County FL 1 N. Pearson, A. Poulos depression concave LRR U 26.302296 -81.771785 Urban Land-Holopaw-Basinger Complex Yes NO NO NO X NO NO NO x X X X X X X x 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 851 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below). 1 30'x30' slash pine (Pinus elliottii) cypress (Taxodium spp.) ear-leaf acacia (Acacia auriculiformis) java plum (Syzgium cumini) melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquinervia) laurel oak (Quercus laurifolia) 15 10 5 5 2 2 39 38 YES 26 YES NO NO NO NO FAC FACW OBL FAC FAC FACW 7 7 100 77 33 6619.5 7.8 130 39030'x30' cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto) carrotwood (Cupaniopsis anacarioides) 20 5 2 27 74 YES 18 NO NO FAC FAC FACU 936Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolia) 420 183 519 2.84 13.5 5.4 30'x30' Myrsine (Rapanea punctata) ear-leaf acacia (Acacia auriculiformis) wax myrtle (Morella cerifera) saw palmetto (Serenoa repens) cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto) shining sumac (Rhus copallinum) swamp fern (Telmatoblechnum serrulatum) tropical almond (Terminalia catappa) cocoplum (Chrysobalanus icaco) saw grass (Cladium jamaicense) swamp bay (Persea palustris) 20 15 10 10 7 5 2 2 2 2 2 1 78 26 YES 19 YES 13 YES 13 YES NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO FAC FAC FAC FAC FACU FAC UPL FACW UPL FACW OBL FACW Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolia) 39 15.6 30'x30' 0 00 X 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 852 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (A1) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) Histic Epipedon (A2) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B) 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Red Parent Material (TF2) Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) Redox Depressions (F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) Marl (F10) (LRR U) Other (Explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present, Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic. Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B) Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) Stripped Matrix (S6) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: 1 0-4.5 4.5-12 6/2 10YR 3/2 YR 6/2 10YR 7/2 10/YR 80 20 85 15 Sand Sand Sand Sand salt and pepper with roots Stripping ✔ None X Soils exhibited stripped matrix at 4.5 inches from the soil surface. There was a duff layer that was approximately 1-1.5 inches thick that included pine needles, leaves and other organic material that had not broken down. Stripping was weak and almost undetectable. 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 853 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 854 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0 :(7/$1''(7(50,1$7,21'$7$)250±$WODQWLFDQG*XOI&RDVWDO3ODLQ5HJLRQ Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) 6800$5<2)),1',1*6±$WWDFKVLWHPDSVKRZLQJVDPSOLQJSRLQWORFDWLRQVWUDQVHFWVLPSRUWDQWIHDWXUHVHWF Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ,VWKH6DPSOHG$UHD ZLWKLQD:HWODQG"<HV1R Remarks: +<'52/2*< :HWODQG+\GURORJ\,QGLFDWRUV Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (B15) /558 Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (B5) Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Sphagnum moss (D8) /5578 )LHOG2EVHUYDWLRQV Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) :HWODQG+\GURORJ\3UHVHQW"<HV1R Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: 9HWHUDQV 0HPRULDO %OYG ([WHQVLRQ 1DSOHV &ROOLHU &RXQW\ &ROOLHU &RXQW\)/ 1 3HDUVRQ $ 3RXORV 67 6 5 ( IODW OHYHO QRQH /55 8 3LQHGD )LQH 6DQG /LPHVWRQH 6XEVWUDWXP ; 12 12 12 ; 12 12 12 ; ;; ; ✔ [ [ [[ 1RQH 6LWH LV QHDU DQ LQXQGDWHG GLUW URDG 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 855 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0 9(*(7$7,21)RXU6WUDWD±Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 'RPLQDQFH7HVWZRUNVKHHW Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) 3UHYDOHQFH,QGH[ZRUNVKHHW Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = +\GURSK\WLF9HJHWDWLRQ,QGLFDWRUV 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 'HILQLWLRQVRI)RXU9HJHWDWLRQ6WUDWD 7UHH – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. 6DSOLQJ6KUXE – Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. +HUE – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. :RRG\YLQH – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. +\GURSK\WLF 9HJHWDWLRQ 3UHVHQW"<HV1R Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below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acket Pg. 856 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0 62,/ Sampling Point: 3URILOH'HVFULSWLRQ'HVFULEHWRWKHGHSWKQHHGHGWRGRFXPHQWWKHLQGLFDWRU RUFRQILUPWKHDEVHQFHRILQGLFDWRUV Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. +\GULF6RLO,QGLFDWRUV$SSOLFDEOHWRDOO/55VXQOHVVRWKHUZLVHQRWHG,QGLFDWRUVIRU3UREOHPDWLF+\GULF6RLOV Histosol (A1) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) /55678 1 cm Muck (A9) /552 Histic Epipedon (A2) Thin Dark Surface (S9) /55678 2 cm Muck (A10) /556 Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) /552 Reduced Vertic (F18) RXWVLGH0/5$$% Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) /55367 Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) Organic Bodies (A6) /55378 Redox Dark Surface (F6) 0/5$% 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) /55378 Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Red Parent Material (TF2) Muck Presence (A8) /558 Redox Depressions (F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 1 cm Muck (A9) /5537 Marl (F10) /558 Other (Explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Ochric (F11) 0/5$ Thick Dark Surface (A12) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) /552373Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Coast Prairie Redox (A16) 0/5$$ Umbric Surface (F13) /55378 wetland hydrology must be present, Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)/5526 Delta Ochric (F17) 0/5$ unless disturbed or problematic. Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Reduced Vertic (F18) 0/5$$% Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) 0/5$$ Stripped Matrix (S6) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) 0/5$$&' Dark Surface (S7) /553678 5HVWULFWLYH/D\HULIREVHUYHG Type: Depth (inches): +\GULF6RLO3UHVHQW"<HV1R Remarks: <5 <5 <5 6DQG 6DQG 6DQG 0RVWO\ VDOW DQG SHSSHU 6WULSSLQJ ✔ ; 6RLOV H[KLELWHG VWULSSHG PDWUL[ DW LQFKHV IURP WKH VRLO VXUIDFH 6WULSSLQJ ZDV ZHDN EXW WKHUH ZDV VWDQGLQJ ZDWHU LQ WKH ERWWRP RI WKH SOXJ 7KH SOXJ ZDV WDNHQ ZLWKLQ RQH RI WKH UHWLFXODWHG DUHDV RI WKH KDELWDW WKDW H[KLELWHG PRUH ZHWODQG FKDUDFWHULVWLFV GXH WR GHQVH YHJHWDWLRQ DQG URRWV ZKHUH WKH VDZ SDOPHWWR ZDV ORFDWHG 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 857 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 858 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0 :(7/$1''(7(50,1$7,21'$7$)250±$WODQWLFDQG*XOI&RDVWDO3ODLQ5HJLRQ Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) 6800$5<2)),1',1*6±$WWDFKVLWHPDSVKRZLQJVDPSOLQJSRLQWORFDWLRQVWUDQVHFWVLPSRUWDQWIHDWXUHVHWF Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ,VWKH6DPSOHG$UHD ZLWKLQD:HWODQG"<HV1R Remarks: +<'52/2*< :HWODQG+\GURORJ\,QGLFDWRUV Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (B15) /558 Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (B5) Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Sphagnum moss (D8) /5578 )LHOG2EVHUYDWLRQV Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) :HWODQG+\GURORJ\3UHVHQW"<HV1R Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: 9HWHUDQ V 0HPRULDO %OYG ([WHQVLRQ 1DSOHV &ROOLHU &ROOLHU &RXQW\)/ 0DULHOOH 1DJHRQ GH /HVWDQJ 6 7 6 5 ( IODW OHYHO QRQH /55 3LQHGD )LQH 6DQG /LPHVWRQH 6XEVWUDWXP ; 12 12 12 ; 12 12 12 [ ;; ; ; ; ;; 1$ RI SLQH GXII SUHVHQW 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 859 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0 9(*(7$7,21)RXU6WUDWD±Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 'RPLQDQFH7HVWZRUNVKHHW Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) 3UHYDOHQFH,QGH[ZRUNVKHHW Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = +\GURSK\WLF9HJHWDWLRQ,QGLFDWRUV 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 'HILQLWLRQVRI)RXU9HJHWDWLRQ6WUDWD 7UHH – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. 6DSOLQJ6KUXE – Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. +HUE – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. :RRG\YLQH – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. +\GURSK\WLF 9HJHWDWLRQ 3UHVHQW"<HV1R Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below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acket Pg. 860 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0 62,/ Sampling Point: 3URILOH'HVFULSWLRQ'HVFULEHWRWKHGHSWKQHHGHGWRGRFXPHQWWKHLQGLFDWRU RUFRQILUPWKHDEVHQFHRILQGLFDWRUV Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. +\GULF6RLO,QGLFDWRUV$SSOLFDEOHWRDOO/55VXQOHVVRWKHUZLVHQRWHG,QGLFDWRUVIRU3UREOHPDWLF+\GULF6RLOV Histosol (A1) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) /55678 1 cm Muck (A9) /552 Histic Epipedon (A2) Thin Dark Surface (S9) /55678 2 cm Muck (A10) /556 Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) /552 Reduced Vertic (F18) RXWVLGH0/5$$% Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) /55367 Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) Organic Bodies (A6) /55378 Redox Dark Surface (F6) 0/5$% 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) /55378 Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Red Parent Material (TF2) Muck Presence (A8) /558 Redox Depressions (F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 1 cm Muck (A9) /5537 Marl (F10) /558 Other (Explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Ochric (F11) 0/5$ Thick Dark Surface (A12) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) /552373Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Coast Prairie Redox (A16) 0/5$$ Umbric Surface (F13) /55378 wetland hydrology must be present, Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)/5526 Delta Ochric (F17) 0/5$ unless disturbed or problematic. Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Reduced Vertic (F18) 0/5$$% Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) 0/5$$ Stripped Matrix (S6) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) 0/5$$&' Dark Surface (S7) /553678 5HVWULFWLYH/D\HULIREVHUYHG Type: Depth (inches): +\GULF6RLO3UHVHQW"<HV1R Remarks: <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 VDQG\ VDQG\ VDQG\ VDQG\ VDQG\ VDQG\ URRWV VDOW SHSSHU VWLOO VRPH URRWV SUHVHQW VWLOO VRPH URRWV SUHVHQW VWLOO VRPH URRWV SUHVHQWVDQG\ ✔ 1RQH REVHUYHG ; 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 861 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 862 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0 :(7/$1''(7(50,1$7,21'$7$)250±$WODQWLFDQG*XOI&RDVWDO3ODLQ5HJLRQ Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) 6800$5<2)),1',1*6±$WWDFKVLWHPDSVKRZLQJVDPSOLQJSRLQWORFDWLRQVWUDQVHFWVLPSRUWDQWIHDWXUHVHWF Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ,VWKH6DPSOHG$UHD ZLWKLQD:HWODQG"<HV1R Remarks: +<'52/2*< :HWODQG+\GURORJ\,QGLFDWRUV Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (B15) /558 Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (B5) Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Sphagnum moss (D8) /5578 )LHOG2EVHUYDWLRQV Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) :HWODQG+\GURORJ\3UHVHQW"<HV1R Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: 9HWHUDQ V 0HPRULDO %OYG ([WHQVLRQ 1DSOHV &ROOLHU &ROOLHU &RXQW\)/ 0DULHOOH 1DJHRQ GH /HVWDQJ 6 7 6 5 ( IODW OHYHO QRQH /55 3LQHGD )LQH 6DQG /LPHVWRQH 6XEVWUDWXP ; 12 12 12 ; 12 12 12 [ ;; ; ✔ ✔ ; ; ;!; 1$ 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 863 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0 9(*(7$7,21)RXU6WUDWD±Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 'RPLQDQFH7HVWZRUNVKHHW Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) 3UHYDOHQFH,QGH[ZRUNVKHHW Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = +\GURSK\WLF9HJHWDWLRQ,QGLFDWRUV 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 'HILQLWLRQVRI)RXU9HJHWDWLRQ6WUDWD 7UHH – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. 6DSOLQJ6KUXE – Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. +HUE – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. :RRG\YLQH – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. +\GURSK\WLF 9HJHWDWLRQ 3UHVHQW"<HV1R Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below). [ HDUOHDI DFDFLD $FDFLD DXULFXOLIRUPLV FDEEDJH SDOP 6DEDO SDOPHWWR PHODOHXFD 0HODOHXFD TXLQTXHQHUYLD F\SUHVV 7D[RGLXP GLVWLFKXP ODXUHO RDN 4XHUFXV ODXULIROLD <(6 <(6 <(6 12 12 )$&: )$& )$& )$& 2%/ [ %UD]LOLDQ SHSSHU 6KLQXV WHUHELQWKLIROLD PHODOHXFD 0HODOHXFD TXLQTXHQHUYLD FDUURWZRRG &XSDQLRSVLV DQDFDUGLRLGHV P\UVLQH 5DSDQHD SXQFWDWD F\SUHVV 7D[RGLXP GLVWLFKXP VFKHIIOHUD 6FKHIIOHUD DFWLQRSK\OOD <(6 <(6 12 12 12 12 12 )$& )$& )$& )$& 2%/ 83/ FDEEDJH SDOP 6DEDO SDOPHWWR ✔ ✔ [ FDUURWZRRG &XSDQLRSVLV DQDFDUGLRLGHV ODXUHO RDN 4XHUFXV ODXULIROLD P\UVLQH 5DSDQHD SXQFWDWD %UD]LOLDQ SHSSHU 6KLQXV WHUHELQWKLIROLD PHODOHXFD 0HODOHXFD TXLQTXHQHUYLD <(6 <(6 12 12 12 12 )$&: )$&: )$& )$& )$& VZDPS IHUQ %OHFKQXP VHUUXODWXP [ JUDSHYLQH 9LWXV URWXQLGLIROLD VPLOD[ 6PLOD[ DXULFXODWD <(6 <(6 )$& )$&8 ; 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 864 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0 62,/ Sampling Point: 3URILOH'HVFULSWLRQ'HVFULEHWRWKHGHSWKQHHGHGWRGRFXPHQWWKHLQGLFDWRU RUFRQILUPWKHDEVHQFHRILQGLFDWRUV Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. +\GULF6RLO,QGLFDWRUV$SSOLFDEOHWRDOO/55VXQOHVVRWKHUZLVHQRWHG,QGLFDWRUVIRU3UREOHPDWLF+\GULF6RLOV Histosol (A1) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) /55678 1 cm Muck (A9) /552 Histic Epipedon (A2) Thin Dark Surface (S9) /55678 2 cm Muck (A10) /556 Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) /552 Reduced Vertic (F18) RXWVLGH0/5$$% Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) /55367 Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) Organic Bodies (A6) /55378 Redox Dark Surface (F6) 0/5$% 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) /55378 Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Red Parent Material (TF2) Muck Presence (A8) /558 Redox Depressions (F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 1 cm Muck (A9) /5537 Marl (F10) /558 Other (Explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Ochric (F11) 0/5$ Thick Dark Surface (A12) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) /552373Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Coast Prairie Redox (A16) 0/5$$ Umbric Surface (F13) /55378 wetland hydrology must be present, Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)/5526 Delta Ochric (F17) 0/5$ unless disturbed or problematic. Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Reduced Vertic (F18) 0/5$$% Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) 0/5$$ Stripped Matrix (S6) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) 0/5$$&' Dark Surface (S7) /553678 5HVWULFWLYH/D\HULIREVHUYHG Type: Depth (inches): +\GULF6RLO3UHVHQW"<HV1R Remarks: $// <5 VDQG\ VDQG\ VDQG\ VDQG\ VDQG\ VWDLQHG ILQJHUV ✔ ✔ 1RQH REVHUYHG ; 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 865 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 866 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Veterans Memorial Blvd Extension Soil Profile Locations Drainage swale to south of project area. Photo taken 8/16 after heavy rains. Notice berm adjacent to swale and lack of standing water throughout. Habitat near soil profile location #1 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 867 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Habitat near soil profile location #2. Note predominately saw palmetto understory coverage. Habitat near soil profile location #3. Note heavy duff layer and lack of hydrology at height of wet season after heavy rains. 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 868 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Habitat near soil profile location #4. 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 869 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) <> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SUBJECTPROPERTYSUBJECTPROPERTYSUBJECTPROPERTY<> LATITUDE: N 26° 17' 53.976"<> LONGITUDE: W 81° 47' 16.283"<> 00146640104,00145720106,00146080007,00153160004NAPLES, FL XXXXXREV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:DESIGNED:p:\19094.00 veteran memorial blvd extension\CAD\PERMIT-STATE\19094-STATE-EAST.dwg LOCATION 9/20/2019 THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:THRMJ09-18-1919094-LOCATION MAP-------------------01 OF 06NESW      8588288641MARCOISLANDEVERGLADESCITY9329846NAPLES90908399483783784129292983983992887846951862I-758486431856850846890896KEY WESTTAMPAFT.MYERSMIAMINAPLES28.A.18Packet Pg. 870Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, NESW0 250 5001000SCALE IN FEETREV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:DESIGNED:p:\19094.00 veteran memorial blvd extension\CAD\PERMIT-STATE\19094-STATE-EAST.dwg FLUCFCS 9/20/2019 THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:THRMJ09-18-1919094-OVERALL FLUCFCS MAP-------------------02 OF 06xSURVEY COURTESY OF:xxSURVEY DATED:NOTES:xTHESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE."Q. GRADY MINOR"8-19-13FLUCFCSDESCRIPTIONAREA(AC)411PINE FLATWOODS1.56411E1PINE FLATWOODS (EXOTICS 0-25%)17.01411E2PINE FLATWOODS (EXOTICS 25-50%)2.13416SCRUBBY FLATWOODS0.71617 MIXED WETLAND HARDWOODS0.31621CYPRESS0.32624CYPRESS - PINE - CABBAGE PALM0.44814ROADS AND HIGHWAYS0.12TOTAL22.60624617624411E1411E1624621814PROPERTYLINEOFFSITEFLUFCFS411E2411416411E2625621641621814UPLAND (ACRES):WETLAND (ACRES):PROJECT (ACRES):28.A.18Packet Pg. 871Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, NESW0 150 300600SCALE IN FEETREV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:DESIGNED:p:\19094.00 veteran memorial blvd extension\CAD\PERMIT-STATE\19094-STATE-EAST.dwg FLUCFCS DET 9/20/2019 THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:THRMJ09-18-1919094-FLUCFCS DETAIL MAP-------------------03 OF 06411E1617624SCALE: 1" = 300'EAST FLUCFCSSCALE: 1" = 300'WEST FLUCFCS416411UPLAND (ACRES):WETLAND (ACRES):PROJECT (ACRES):xSURVEY COURTESY OF:xxSURVEY DATED:NOTES:xTHESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE."Q. GRADY MINOR"8-19-13PROPERTYLINEPROPERTYLINE411E1411E1624624621814411E2MATCLINEMATCLINE1112345109678IDFLUCFCSDESCRIPTIONAREA(AC)1411E1PINE FLATWOODS (EXOTICS 0-25%)17.012624CYPRESS - PINE - CABBAGE PALM0.013617 MIXED WETLAND HARDWOODS0.314 624CYPRESS - PINE - CABBAGE PALM0.085814ROADS AND HIGHWAYS0.126411E2PINE FLATWOODS (EXOTICS 25-50%)2.137411PINE FLATWOODS1.568416SCRUBBY FLATWOODS0.719621CYPRESS0.3210 624CYPRESS - PINE - CABBAGE PALM0.35TOTAL22.60621411E262164162581425'25'OFFSITEFLUFCFS28.A.18Packet Pg. 872Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, NESW0 150 300600SCALE IN FEETREV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:DESIGNED:p:\19094.00 veteran memorial blvd extension\CAD\PERMIT-STATE\19094-STATE-EAST.dwg IMPACTS DET 9/20/2019 THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:THRMJ09-18-1919094-IMPACTS MAP-------------------04 OF 06SCALE: 1" = 300'EAST FLUCFCSSCALE: 1" = 300'WEST FLUCFCS411E1617624416411PROPERTYLINEPROPERTYLINE411E1411E1624624621814411E2MATCLINEMATCLINExSURVEY COURTESY OF:xxSURVEY DATED:NOTES:xTHESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE."Q. GRADY MINOR"8-19-13WETLAND IMPACT (SQ FT)IDFLUCFCSDESCRIPTIONAREA(AC)2624CYPRESS - PINE - CABBAGE PALM0.013617 MIXED WETLAND HARDWOODS0.314624CYPRESS - PINE - CABBAGE PALM0.089621CYPRESS0.3210 624CYPRESS - PINE - CABBAGE PALM0.35TOTAL1.07234109OFFSITEFLUFCFS621411E262164162581428.A.18Packet Pg. 873Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, NESW0 250 5001000SCALE IN FEETREV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:DESIGNED:p:\19094.00 veteran memorial blvd extension\CAD\PERMIT-STATE\19094-STATE-EAST.dwg SOILS 9/20/2019 THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:THRMJ09-18-1919094-SOILS MAP-------------------05 OF 06xSURVEY COURTESY OF:xxSURVEY DATED:NOTES:xTHESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.xSOIL DATA PROVIDED BY:1998 UNITED STATES DEPT OF AGRICULTURESOIL SURVEY OF COLLIER COUNTY AREA, FL"Q. GRADY MINOR"8-19-13CODEDESCRIPTIONHYDRIC14PINEDA FINE SAND, LIMESTONESUBSTRATUMYES21BOCA FINE SAND25BOCA, RIVIERA, LIMESTONESUBSTRATUM, AND COPELAND FINESANDS, DEPRESSIONALYES33URBAN LAND-HOLOPAW-BASINGERCOMPLEXPROPERTYLINESOILPLUG 2SOILPLUG 1SOILPLUG 4SOILPLUG 328.A.18Packet Pg. 874Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, NESW0 5501100 2200SCALE IN FEETREV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:DESIGNED:p:\19094.00 veteran memorial blvd extension\CAD\PERMIT-STATE\19094-STATE-EAST.dwg WATERWAYS 9/20/2019 THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:THRMJ09-19-1919094-OVERVIEW OF NEARBY WATERWAYS-------------------06 OF 06xSURVEY COURTESY OF:xxSURVEY DATED:NOTES:xTHESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.xSOIL DATA PROVIDED BY:1998 UNITED STATES DEPT OF AGRICULTURESOIL SURVEY OF COLLIER COUNTY AREA, FL"Q. GRADY MINOR"8-19-13PROJECTAREATRIBUTARY TO THE COCOHATCHEE RIVERCONVEYANCE DITCH AND LAKESGRASSED WIDE SWALE THAT IS ONLYPARTIALLY INUNDATED AT PEAK WET SEASONBERM SEPARATING SITE FROM GRASSED SWALEGRASSED WIDE SWALE THAT ISONLY PARTIALLY INUNDATED ATPEAK WET SEASONBERM SEPARATING SITEFROM GRASSED SWALECONVEYANCE DITCHAND LAKESTRIBUTARY TO THECOCOHATCHEE RIVERCOCOHATCHEE RIVERADJACENTROWWETLAND AREASWETLAND AREAS28.A.18Packet Pg. 875Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, WĂŐĞͮϰϮ y,//dϮϮ WZ>/D/EZz,/^dKZ/>E Z,K>K'/>d 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 876 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) 6RXWK%URQRXJK6WUHHW7DOODKDVVHH)/ZZZIOKHULWDJHFRPSUHVHUYDWLRQVLWHILOH SK_ID[_6LWH)LOH#GRVVWDWHIOXV This record search is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute a project review. This search only identifies resources recorded at the Florida Master Site File and does NOT provide project approval from the Division of Historical Resources. Contact the Compliance and Review Section of the Division of Historical Resources at 850-245-6333 for project review information. 2FWREHU 0DULHOOH1DJHRQGH/HVWDQJ2SHUDWLRQV0DQDJHU 7XUUHOO+DOO $VVRFLDWHV,QF 0DULQHDQG(QYLURQPHQWDO&RQVXOWLQJ 1DSOHV1DVVDX ([FKDQJH$YH1DSOHV)/ )D[ (PDLO0DULHOOH#WKDQDSOHVFRP ,QUHVSRQVHWR\RXULQTXLU\RI2FWREHUWKH)ORULGD0DVWHU6LWH)LOHOLVWVRQHDUFKHRORJLFDOVLWH DQGQRRWKHUFXOWXUDOUHVRXUFHVIRXQGDWWKHGHVLJQDWHGSDUFHOLQ&ROOLHU&RXQW\ZKLFKH[WHQGV9HWHUDQ¶V 0HPRULDO%OYGIURP/LYLQJVWRQ5RDGWR2OG86)ORULGD 6HFWLRQVDQG7RZQVKLS6RXWK5DQJH(DVW :KHQLQWHUSUHWLQJWKHUHVXOWVRIRXUVHDUFKSOHDVHFRQVLGHUWKHIROORZLQJLQIRUPDWLRQ x7KLVVHDUFKDUHDPD\FRQWDLQunrecordedDUFKDHRORJLFDOVLWHVKLVWRULFDOVWUXFWXUHV RURWKHUUHVRXUFHVHYHQLISUHYLRXVO\VXUYH\HGIRUFXOWXUDOUHVRXUFHV x%HFDXVHYDQGDOLVPDQGORRWLQJDUHFRPPRQDW)ORULGDVLWHVZHDVNWKDW\RXOLPLW WKHGLVWULEXWLRQRIORFDWLRQLQIRUPDWLRQRQDUFKDHRORJLFDOVLWHV x:KLOHPDQ\RIRXUUHFRUGVGRFXPHQWKLVWRULFDOO\VLJQLILFDQWUHVRXUFHVWKH GRFXPHQWDWLRQRIDUHVRXUFHDWWKH)ORULGD0DVWHU6LWH)LOHGRHVQRWQHFHVVDULO\ PHDQWKHUHVRXUFHLVKLVWRULFDOO\VLJQLILFDQW x)HGHUDOVWDWHDQGORFDOODZVUHTXLUHIRUPDOHQYLURQPHQWDOUHYLHZIRUPRVW SURMHFWV7KLVVHDUFK'2(6127FRQVWLWXWHVXFKDUHYLHZ,I\RXUSURMHFWIDOOV XQGHUWKHVHODZV\RXVKRXOGFRQWDFWWKH&RPSOLDQFHDQG5HYLHZ6HFWLRQRIWKH 'LYLVLRQRI+LVWRULFDO5HVRXUFHVDW 3OHDVHGRQRWKHVLWDWHWRFRQWDFWXVLI\RXKDYHDQ\TXHVWLRQVUHJDUGLQJWKHUHVXOWVRIWKLVVHDUFK 6LQFHUHO\ (PDQ09RYVL3K' )ORULGD0DVWHU6LWH)LOH (PDQ9RYVL#'260\)ORULGDFRP 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 877 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) CR00242CR00737Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID,IGN, and the GIS User Community28.A.18 Packet Pg. 878 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) SiteID TypeSite NameAddressAdditional InfoSHPO Eval NR StatusCR00737 AR LIVINGSTON ROADNONE < 4 MILESNot EligibleAR=1SS=0CM=0RG=0BR=0Total=1Cultural Resource RosterPage 1 of 1Created: 10/29/2019Florida Master Site File 28.A.18Packet Pg. 879Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 28.A.18Packet Pg. 880Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, WĂŐĞͮϰϯ y,//dϮϯ WKdEd/>Khd&>>>Kd/KE^ 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 881 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) 28.A.18Packet Pg. 882Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, WĂŐĞͮϰϰ y,//dϮϰ ZKZ/E'^,Dd/ 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 883 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) HORIZ. SCALE (FULL):DATECHECKEDDRAWNRGE:TWP:SEC:DATE:TITLE:CLIENT:PROJECT:OFPROJECT NO.:SHEET NUMBER:REVISIONREV #HORIZ. SCALE (HALF):DESIGNED:DRAWN:VERT. SCALE (FULL):VERT. SCALE (HALF):FILE NAME:FLORIDA LICENSE NO.ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTSVETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD.COLLIER COUNTY%2$5'2)&200,66,21(5611190062.00.00SEPTEMBER 20191" = 500'1" = 1000'.. .. ..KMWSCBN/AN/A190062.00.0065023KEISHA M. WESTBROOK, P.E.EXHIBIT 24 - ROAD DRAINAGE SCHEMATIC6610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200Naples, Florida 34109(239) 597-0575 FAX: (239) 597-0578www.consult-rwa.comFlorida Certificates of AuthorizationEB 7663 LB695228.A.18Packet Pg. 884Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, HORIZ. SCALE (FULL):DATECHECKEDDRAWNRGE:TWP:SEC:DATE:TITLE:CLIENT:PROJECT:OFPROJECT NO.:SHEET NUMBER:REVISIONREV #HORIZ. SCALE (HALF):DESIGNED:DRAWN:VERT. SCALE (FULL):VERT. SCALE (HALF):FILE NAME:FLORIDA LICENSE NO.ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTSVETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD.COLLIER COUNT<%2$5'2)&200,66,21(5611190062.00.00SEPTEMBER 20191" = 500'1" = 1000'.. .. ..KMWSCBN/AN/A190062.00.00 EX0265023KEISHA M. WESTBROOK, P.E.EXHIBIT 24 - ROAD DRAINAGE SCHEMATIC6610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200Naples, Florida 34109(239) 597-0575 FAX: (239) 597-0578www.consult-rwa.comFlorida Certificates of AuthorizationEB 7663 LB695228.A.18Packet Pg. 885Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, WĂŐĞͮϰϱ y,//dϮϱ WZ>/D/EZzW>E^&KZ WZKWK^,/',^,KK> 28.A.18 Packet Pg. 886 Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) 12345678910130'MIN.130'MIN.15'MIN.26'IDEALTAKEOFF BOARD8'-12'8"-24"CC SHERIFFRESIDENCECHILLERTOWER(50'Ø)CC LIFTSTATION(40'x40')BACK-UPGENERATOR(50'x25')FUT.EXPANSION825 PARKING SPACES(NOT COUNTING CONSERVATIONCOLLIER, CC SHERIFF OROVERFLOW SPACES)FUT.EXPANSIONEFFECTIVE BUILDINGFOOTPRINT4365 Radio Road, Suite 201Naples, Florida 34104P: 239.434.6060 F: 239.434.6084Company Cert. of Authorization No. 00009496JEFF L. DAVIDSON, P.E NO. 47161ANDREW E. RATH, P.E. NO. 73996CARL M. THRUSHMAN P.E. NO. 86499RYAN A. WHITE, P.E. NO. 67400JENNA A. WOODWARD, P.E. NO. 84212SHEET TITLE:PROJECT:REVISIONS:CLIENT:DATEREV.DESCRIPTIONCCPS GGG HIGH SCHOOLZYSCOVICH ARCHITECTS100 N BISCAYNE BLVD., 27TH FLOORMIAMI, FLORIDA, 33132PROJECT NO.:19-0028SHEET NO:NOTES: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSCALE:NSITE LOCATION MAPSITELOCATIONOLD 41 RDTO LIVINGSTONG RDFUT VMB PRELIMINARY PLAN DATE: 10/23/19(SUBJECT TO CHANGE)OVERALL SITE PLANC-20.061:8028.A.18Packet Pg. 887Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVDVETERANS MEMORIAL BLVDSCALE:NPLANNING DEPARTMENT4365 Radio Road, Suite 201Naples, Florida 34104P: 239.434.6060Company Cert. of AuthorizationNo. 00009496SCHEMATIC ACCESS & TURNLANE LAYOUTREVISIONSDATEREV.DESCRIPTION1:30MATCH LINEMATCH LINENOTE:TURN LANE DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS BY TR TRANSPORTATION WITHREVISION REQUESTS BY COLLIER COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT[8/23/19 EMAIL SENT TO DE & 9/13/19 SENT TO DE ON 10/15/19]CCPS GGG HIGH SCHOOL08/28/191 INGRESS/EGRESS AND TURN LANE MODIFICATIONS10/09/192 MINOR ACCESS & WEST SIGNAL UPDATES10/15/193 ADDED TAPER TO TURN LANES28.A.18Packet Pg. 888Attachment: 5.C. Pond Siting Report_compressed (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Program Initial Screening Criteria Form Location Description: Approx. 1½ mile east of North Belle Meade Preserve and ½ mile east of Kam Luck Dr, north of I-75; RFMUD-NRPA-NBMO-Sending Property Description Owner Address and/or Folio Acreage William & Martha Diveley Trust 00352640008 10.0 Qualified sites shall then be further prioritized by secondary evaluative criteria. 1. Does the property contain a CLIP Priority 1 Natural Community - Upland Hardwood Forest, Scrub, Coastal Upland, Dry Prairie, or Upland Pine? Ord. 2002-63, Sec 12(1)(a) Yes No (If yes, briefly describe how parcel meets the above criteria): Parcel does not contain CLIP Priority 1 Natural Community. Mapped as Mixed Scrub-Shrub Wetland and Hydric Pine Flatwoods 2. Does the property contain a CLIP Priority 2-4 Natural Community - Pine Flatwoods or Coastal Wetlands? Ord. 2002-63, Sec 12(1)(b) Yes No (If yes, briefly describe how parcel meets the above criteria): Parcel contains Hydric Pine Flatwoods 3. Does the property contain other native, natural communities? Ord. 2002-63, Sec 12(1)(c) Yes No (If yes, briefly describe how parcel meets the above criteria): The parcel also contains Mixed Scrub-Shrub Wetland, but already met Criteria 2. 4. Does land offer cultural values, appropriate access for natural resource-based recreation, and the enhancement of the aesthetic setting of Collier County? Ord. 2002-63, Sec 12(1)(d) Yes No (If yes, briefly describe how parcel meets the above criteria): The property is only accessible via the private Blackburn road and an unimproved trail with no connection to other County owned property that could provide public access in the future. 5. Does the property offer opportunities for protection of water resource values, including aquifer recharge, water quality enhancement, protection of wetland dependent species habitat, wildfire risk reduction, storm surge protection, and flood control? Ord. 2002-63, Sec. 12 (1)(e) Yes No (If yes, briefly describe how parcel meets the above criteria): The property is mapped as containing 100% hydric soils and most likely holds water during the wet season. 6. Does the property offer significant biological values, including biodiversity and listed species habitat? Ord. 2002-63, Sec. 12 (1)(f) Yes No (If yes, briefly describe how parcel meets the above criteria): 28.A.19 Packet Pg. 889 Attachment: 5.D. Diveley Trust - Initial Screening (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) The parcel provides FL panther habitat and potential Big Cypress fox squirrel, red-cockaded woodpecker, and gopher tortoise habitat. 7. Does the property enhance and/or protect the environmental value of current conservation lands through function as a buffer, ecological link or habitat corridor? Ord. 2002-63, Sec. 12 (1)(g) Yes No (If yes, briefly describe how parcel meets the above criteria): The parcels to the west and east of the property are protected under private conservation easements. 8. Is the property within a Board-approved target protection mailing area? Ord. 2002-63, Sec. 12 (1)(h) Yes No (If yes, briefly describe how parcel meets the above criteria): The parcel is not within a Boar approved TPMA. The property satisfies 4 initial screening criteria 28.A.19 Packet Pg. 890 Attachment: 5.D. Diveley Trust - Initial Screening (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Figure 1: Diveley Trust Property Location Map 28.A.19 Packet Pg. 891 Attachment: 5.D. Diveley Trust - Initial Screening (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Figure 2: Diveley Trust Property Aerial Map 28.A.19 Packet Pg. 892 Attachment: 5.D. Diveley Trust - Initial Screening (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Conservation Collier Initial Criteria Screening Report Santamaria Owner Name: Helen S. Santamaria et al Size: 61.1 acres Folio Number: 00052040005 and 00052120006 Staff Report Date: April 3, 2024 117 57 80 56 160 80 80 80 0 50 100 150 200 1 - Ecological Value 2 - Human Value 3 - Restoration and Management 4 - Vulnerability Total Score: 310/400 Awarded Points Possible Points 28.A.20 Packet Pg. 893 Attachment: 5.E.1. Santamaria- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: 00052040005 and 00052120006 Owner Names: Santamaria Date: April 3, 2024 2 Table of Contents Table of Contents ......................................................................................................................................... 2 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 4 2. Summary of Property ............................................................................................................................ 5 Figure 1 - Parcels Location Overview .......................................................................................................5 Figure 2 - Parcels Close-up .......................................................................................................................6 Figure 3 - Parcels within TPMA .................................................................................................................7 2.1 Summary of Property Information ....................................................................................................8 Table 1 – Summary of Property Information .....................................................................................8 Figure 4 - Secondary Criteria Score ....................................................................................................9 Table 2 - Secondary Criteria Score Summary .....................................................................................9 2.2 Summary of Assessed Value and Property Cost Estimates ........................................................... 10 Table 3. Assessed & Estimated Value ............................................................................................. 10 2.2.1 Zoning, Growth Management and Conservation Overlays ................................................. 10 2.3 Initial Screening Criteria Satisfaction (Ord. 2002-63, Sec. 12) ...................................................... 11 3. Initial Screening Criteria ...................................................................................................................... 13 3.1 Ecological Values ............................................................................................................................. 13 3.1.1 Vegetative Communities ....................................................................................................... 13 Table 4. Listed Plant Species.................................................................................................... 14 Figure 5 - CLIP4 Priority Natural Communities ........................................................................ 15 Figure 6 - Florida Cooperative Land Cover Classification System ............................................ 16 Figure 7 – Mesic Hammock ..................................................................................................... 17 Figure 8 – Wetland Forest Mixed ............................................................................................ 17 3.1.2 Wildlife Communities ............................................................................................................ 18 Table 5 – Listed Wildlife Detected ........................................................................................... 18 Table 6 – Potential Listed Wildlife Species .............................................................................. 18 Figure 9 - Wildlife Spatial Data (i.e., telemetry, roosts, etc) .................................................... 19 Figure 10 - CLIP4 Potential Habitat Richness ........................................................................... 20 3.1.3 Water Resources ................................................................................................................... 21 Figure 11 - CLIP Aquifer Recharge Priority and Wellfield Protection Zones ............................ 22 Figure 12 - Collier County Soil Survey ...................................................................................... 23 Figure 13 LIDAR Elevation Map ............................................................................................... 24 3.1.4 Ecosystem Connectivity ........................................................................................................ 25 28.A.20 Packet Pg. 894 Attachment: 5.E.1. Santamaria- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: 00052040005 and 00052120006 Owner Names: Santamaria Date: April 3, 2024 3 Figure 14 - Florida Wildlife Corridor and Santamaria .............................................................. 25 ................................................................................................................................................ 26 Figure 15 - Conservation Lands ............................................................................................... 26 3.2 Human Values ................................................................................................................................. 27 3.2.1 Recreation ............................................................................................................................. 27 3.2.2 Accessibility ........................................................................................................................... 27 3.2.3 Aesthetic/Cultural Enhancement ......................................................................................... 27 Figure 16 - View of the Santamaria parcels from the CREW Cypress Dome Trails .................. 27 Figure 17 – Aerial views of Santamaria structures .................................................................. 28 3.3 Restoration and Management ....................................................................................................... 29 3.3.1 Vegetation Management ...................................................................................................... 29 3.3.1.1 Invasive Vegetation ..................................................................................................... 29 3.3.1.2 Prescribed Fire ............................................................................................................ 29 3.3.2 Remediation and Site Security .............................................................................................. 29 3.3.3 Assistance .............................................................................................................................. 29 3.4 Vulnerability .................................................................................................................................... 30 3.4.1 Zoning and Land Use ............................................................................................................. 30 Figure 18 – Zoning ................................................................................................................... 30 Figure 19 –Future Land Use .................................................................................................... 31 3.4.2 Development Plans ............................................................................................................... 32 4. Acquisition Considerations .................................................................................................................. 32 5. Management Needs and Costs .............................................................................................................. 32 Table 7 - Estimated Costs of Site Remediation, Improvements, and Management ................ 32 6. Potential for Matching Funds .............................................................................................................. 33 7. Secondary Criteria Scoring Form ......................................................................................................... 34 8. Additional Site Photos ......................................................................................................................... 40 APPENDIX 1 – Critical Lands and Water Identification Maps (CLIP) Definitions ...................................... 50 28.A.20 Packet Pg. 895 Attachment: 5.E.1. Santamaria- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: 00052040005 and 00052120006 Owner Names: Santamaria Date: April 3, 2024 4 1. Introduction The Conservation Collier Program (Program) is an environmentally sensitive land acquisition and management program approved by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners (Board) in 2002 and by Collier County Voters in 2002 and 2006. The Program was active in acquisition between 2003 and 2011, under the terms of the referendum. Between 2011 and 2016, the Program was in management mode. In 2017, the Collier County Board reauthorized Conservation Collier to seek additional lands (2/14/17, Agenda Item 11B). On November 3, 2020, the Collier County electors approved the Conservation Collier Re-establishment referendum with a 76.5% majority. This Initial Criteria Screening Report (ICSR) has been prepared for the Conservation Collier to meet requirements specified in the Conservation Collier Implementation Ordinance, 2002-63, as amended, and for purposes of the Conservation Collier Program. The sole purpose of this report is to provide objective data to demonstrate how properties meet the criteria defined by the ordinance. The following sections characterize the property location and assessed value, elaborate on the initial and secondary screening criteria scoring, and describe potential funding sources, appropriate use, site improvements, and estimated management costs. 28.A.20 Packet Pg. 896 Attachment: 5.E.1. Santamaria- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: 00052040005 and 00052120006 Owner Names: Santamaria Date: April 3, 2024 5 2. Summary of Property Figure 1 - Parcels Location Overview 28.A.20 Packet Pg. 897 Attachment: 5.E.1. Santamaria- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: 00052040005 and 00052120006 Owner Names: Santamaria Date: April 3, 2024 6 Figure 2 - Parcels Close-up 28.A.20 Packet Pg. 898 Attachment: 5.E.1. Santamaria- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: 00052040005 and 00052120006 Owner Names: Santamaria Date: April 3, 2024 7 Figure 3 - Parcels within TPMA 28.A.20 Packet Pg. 899 Attachment: 5.E.1. Santamaria- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: 00052040005 and 00052120006 Owner Names: Santamaria Date: April 3, 2024 8 2.1 Summary of Property Information Table 1 – Summary of Property Information Characteristic Value Comments Name Santamaria Helen S. Santamaria, et al. Folio Number 00052040005, 00052120006 Target Protection Area (Ord. 2002-63, Section 10.3) Caracara Prairie Preserve TPMA Size 61.1 acres Section, Township, and Range S19, T46S, R28E Zoning Category/TDRs/ Overlays A-MHO Zoned Agricultural with Mobile Home Overlay (1 unit / 5 ac.) – outside of RLSA; Future Land Use Designation - Conservation FEMA Flood Map Category AH AH - Area close to water hazard that has a one percent chance of experiencing shallow flooding between one and three feet each year Existing structures Historic house, pole barn, cattle chutes, power lines An historic house, a pole barn, and cattle chutes exist on the front 41.1-acre parcel. Power lines present along western boundary of acquisition parcels to service the house. Adjoining properties and their Uses Conservation, single-family, transportation; proposed Kingston Ranch development CREW District lands to the south and east; single family wooded lots and unimproved pasture to the north; Whidden Loop Rd. along the NW boundary; Corkscrew Rd. along the western boundary; Kingston Ranch (6,676 acres) west of Corkscrew Rd. - proposed development agreement includes 10,000 dwelling units, 240 hotel units, 700,000 square feet of commercial use and 3,287 acres of restoration, conservation and flow way. Development Plans Submitted None Known Property Irregularities Cattle pond and ditches Owner currently grazes a small number of cattle to maintain pastures. Some ditches and culverts exist on site to alter hydrology and water levels in the pastures. Barbed wire fencing surrounds property boundary and bisects two parcels. Fencing minimal and in good condition. Approx. 0.2 acre cattle pond on western side of southern parcel; ditch running east/west from cattle pond to wetland to the east Other County Dept Interest Transportation Roadway shoulder expansion may be needed in near future; potential for Lee County to widen Corkscrew Rd. from 2 lanes to 4 lanes in the future 28.A.20 Packet Pg. 900 Attachment: 5.E.1. Santamaria- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: 00052040005 and 00052120006 Owner Names: Santamaria Date: April 3, 2024 9 Figure 4 - Secondary Criteria Score Table 2 - Secondary Criteria Score Summary Criteria Awarded Weighted Points Possible Weighted Points Awarded/Possible Points 1 - Ecological Value 117 160 73% 1.1 - Vegetative Communities 40 53 75% 1.2 - Wildlife Communities 27 27 100% 1.3 - Water Resources 17 27 65% 1.4 - Ecosystem Connectivity 33 53 63% 2 - Human Values 57 80 71% 2.1 - Recreation 23 34 67% 2.2 - Accessibility 26 34 75% 2.3 - Aesthetics/Cultural Enhancement 9 11 75% 3 - Restoration and Management 80 80 100% 3.1 - Vegetation Management 55 55 100% 3.2 - Remediation and Site Security 23 23 100% 3.3 - Assistance 2 2 100% 4 - Vulnerability 56 80 69% 4.1 - Zoning and Land Use 44 58 77% 4.2 - Development Plans 11 22 50% Total 310 400 78% 117 57 80 56 160 80 80 80 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 1 - Ecological Value 2 - Human Value 3 - Restoration and Management 4 - Vulnerability Total Score: 310/400 Awarded Points Possible Points 28.A.20 Packet Pg. 901 Attachment: 5.E.1. Santamaria- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: 00052040005 and 00052120006 Owner Names: Santamaria Date: April 3, 2024 10 2.2 Summary of Assessed Value and Property Cost Estimates The interest being appraised is fee simple “as is” for the purchase of the site. A value of the parcel will estimated using only one of the three traditional approaches to value, the sales comparison approach. It is based on the principal of substitution that an informed purchaser would pay no more for the rights in acquiring a particular real property than the cost of acquiring, without undue delay, an equally desirable one. Three properties were selected for comparison, each with similar site characteristics, utility availability, zoning classification and road access. No inspection was made of the property or comparables used in this report and the Real Estate Services Department staff relies upon information solely provided by program staff. The valuation conclusion is limited only by the reported assumptions and conditions that no other known or unknown adverse conditions exist. If the Board of County Commissioners choose to acquire this property, appraisals by two independent Real Estate Appraisers will be obtained at that time. Pursuant to the Conservation Collier Purchase Policy, two appraisals are required for the Santamaria property, which has an initial valuation over $500,000; 2 independent Real Estate Appraiser will value the subject property and the average of those 2 appraisal reports will determine the actual value of the subject property and will be used to determine the offer made on the subject property. Table 3. Assessed & Estimated Value Property owner Address Acreage Assessed Value* Estimated Value** Helen S. Santamaria et al 3090 Whidden Loop Rd., Immokalee 61.1 $443,435 TBD * Assessed Value is obtained from the Property Appraiser’s Website. The Assessed Value is based off the current use of the property. **The Estimated Market Value for the Santamaria property will be obtained from the Collier County Real Estate Services Department prior to Board of County Commissioners ranking. 2.2.1 Zoning, Growth Management and Conservation Overlays Zoning, growth management and conservation overlays will affect the value of a parcel. The parcel is zoned A-MHO (Agricultural – Mobile Home Overlay), which allows for 1 unit per 5 acres. It is designated as Conservation on the Future Land Use map. 28.A.20 Packet Pg. 902 Attachment: 5.E.1. Santamaria- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: 00052040005 and 00052120006 Owner Names: Santamaria Date: April 3, 2024 11 2.3 Initial Screening Criteria Satisfaction (Ord. 2002-63, Sec. 12) Criteria 1: CLIP Priority 1 Natural Communities Are Upland Hardwood Forest, Scrub, Coastal Upland, Dry Prairie, or Upland Pine present on the property? YES Statement for Satisfaction of Criteria 1: Parcel contains Mesic Hammock, which is an Upland Hardwood Forest community. Criteria 2: CLIP Priority 2-4 Natural Communities If CLIP 1 Natural Communities are not present on the property, are Pine Flatwoods or Coastal Wetlands present on the property? N/A Statement for Satisfaction of Criteria 2: Parcel contains Hydric Pine Flatwoods, but already contains CLIP Priority 1 Natural Community Upland Hardwood Forest. Criteria 3: Other Native, Natural Communities If CLIP 1-4 Natural Communities are not present on the property, are other native, natural communities present on the property? N/A Statement for Satisfaction of Criteria 3: Parcel also contains Mixed Wetland Hardwoods and Freshwater Marsh, but already contains CLIP Priority 1-4 Natural Communities. Criteria 4: Human Social Values Does land offer cultural values, appropriate access for natural resource-based recreation, and the enhancement of the aesthetic setting of Collier County? YES Statement for Satisfaction of Criteria 4: This parcel is directly adjacent to the CREW Cypress Dome trails, and can be directly accessed from both Corkscrew Rd. and Whidden Loop Rd. It also contains an historic home built in the 1920’s Criteria 5: Water Resources Does the property offer opportunities for protection of water resource values, including aquifer recharge, water quality enhancement, protection of wetland dependent species habitat, wildfire risk reduction, storm surge protection, and flood control? YES Statement for Satisfaction of Criteria 5: The parcel contains hydric soils and wetland vegetation communities. It holds water during the wet season. Acquisition of the parcel would protect the Corkscrew swamp and marsh complex. The Corkscrew swamp and marsh complex provide recharge for the Lower Tamiami aquifer, a source of drinking water for many County and private wells east of County Road 951. 28.A.20 Packet Pg. 903 Attachment: 5.E.1. Santamaria- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: 00052040005 and 00052120006 Owner Names: Santamaria Date: April 3, 2024 12 Criteria 6: Biological and Ecological Value Does the property offer significant biological values, including biodiversity and listed species habitat? YES Statement for Satisfaction of Criteria 6: Telemetry points from the endangered Florida Panther have been documented on the property. The property is adjacent to SFWMD CREW Lands; it can be assumed that the same important wildlife species documented on the CREW Lands also utilize this property including the snail kite, wood stork, and black bear and multiple bird species. Criteria 7: Enhancement of Current Conservation Lands Does the property enhance and/or protect the environmental value of current conservation lands through function as a buffer, ecological link or habitat corridor? Yes Statement for Satisfaction of Criteria 7: The property is adjacent to SFWMD CREW Lands to the south and east. Criteria 8: Target Protection Mailing Area Is the property within a Board-approved target protection mailing area? YES Statement for Satisfaction of Criteria 8: The property is within the Caracara Prairie Preserve Target Protection Mailing Area. 28.A.20 Packet Pg. 904 Attachment: 5.E.1. Santamaria- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: 00052040005 and 00052120006 Owner Names: Santamaria Date: April 3, 2024 13 3. Initial Screening Criteria 3.1 Ecological Values 3.1.1 Vegetative Communities The property consists of Unimproved Pasture, Mixed Wetland Hardwoods, Freshwater Marsh, Hydric Pine Flatwoods, and Mesic Hammock. Characterization of Plant Communities Present Unimproved pastures: This community is found in about one third of the property in areas where canopy and midstory were removed historically and dominant grasses maintained through cattle grazing. Most of the unimproved pasture community was inundated with 4”-8” of standing water during the wet season site visit. Seasonal wetland wildflowers such as swamp sunflower (helianthus angustifolius) and saltmarsh mallow (Kosteletzkya virginica) were observed growing in the inundated pastures. While non- native grasses were present, density of invasive, exotic woody species was low. Groundcover consists of primarily Bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum), native forbs, and species like broomsedge (Andropogon sp.), smutgrass (Sporobolus indicus), caesarweed (Urena lobata), tall elephantsfoot (Elephantopus elatus), muscadine (Vitis rotundifolia), frostweed (Verbesina virginica), Beggarticks (Bidens alba). Midstory consists of scattered cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto), dogfennel (Eupatorium capillifolium), myrsine (Myrsine cubana), hogplum (Ximenia americana), saltbush (Baccharis halimifolia). Canopy consists of scattered live oak (Quercus virginiana), laurel oak (Quercus laurifolia), slash pine (Pinus elliottii) Mesic Hammock: This community is found along the pasture edges of both parcels and is the most dominant natural community present. Density of invasive, exotic woody species was low, and this plant community appeared well maintained and managed. Sprawling old growth oaks dominated the canopy. Low-lying areas retained significant surface water that supported wetland dependent species in the wet season. Groundcover consists of beggarticks, muscadine, cabbage palm, dogfennel, Southern shield fern (Thelypteris kunthii), marshpennywort (Hydrocotyle umbellata), and pickerelweed (Pontederia cordata). Midstory consists of myrsine, wild coffee (Psychotria nervosa), shortleaf wild coffee (Psychotria tenuifolia), American beautyberry (Callicarpa americana), greenbriar (smilax spp.), shoestring fern (Vittaria lineata), and resurrection fern (Pleopeltis michauxiana). Canopy consists of live oak, Laurel oak, and strangler fig (Ficus aurea). Freshwater Marsh: The eastern side of both parcels contain portions of the large, contiguous CREW Marsh which is a 5,000-acre freshwater sawgrass marsh system that provides rain-driven water flow through conservation lands such as CREW Marsh, Pepper Ranch Preserve, Corkscrew Swamp Sanctuary, Bird Rookery Swamp and more. Ground Cover consists of pickerelweed, sawgrass (Cladium jamaicense), arrowhead (Sagittaria lancifolia), maidencane (Hymenachne hemitomon), cattail (Typha domingensis), gulf coast spikerush (Eleocharis cellulosa), sand cordgrass (Spartina bakeri), and water lily (Nymphaea odorata). Midstory consists of cabbage palm, saltbush, Carolina willow (Salix caroliniana), buttonbush (Cephalanthus occidentalis), peruvian primrose willow (Ludwigia peruviana), and American elderberry (Sambucus nigra). Canopy consists of cabbage palm, red maple (Acer rubrum), bald cypress (Taxodium distichum), and pond apple (Annona glabra). 28.A.20 Packet Pg. 905 Attachment: 5.E.1. Santamaria- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: 00052040005 and 00052120006 Owner Names: Santamaria Date: April 3, 2024 14 Mixed Wetland Hardwoods: This native plant community was observed in the interface between the Mesic Hammock habitat and freshwater marsh. Fire suppression over the years has played a role in this community having an abundance of woody growth, vines, and dense midstory fuels while the understory has maintained a diversity of native grasses and sedges with knee deep to waist deep surface water in the wet season. Groundcover consists of sawgrass, sand cordgrass, and submerged aquatic vegetation. Midstory consists of saltbush, greenbriar, hog plum, cabbage palm, myrsine, wild coffee, Carolina willow, wax myrtle (Morella cerifera), and doddervine (Cuscuta sp.). Canopy consists of Cabbage palm, slash pine, red maple, and pop ash (Fraxinus caroliniana). Mixed Shrub Wetlands: This community is along the edges of the freshwater marsh and contains primarily Carolina Willow, saltbush, and sawgrass. Hydric Pine Flatwoods: This native plant community was observed in patchy areas along the interface of improved pasture and wetland hardwood hammock. Mature pines comprised the canopy with low levels of exotic vegetation present. Groundcover consists of Beggarticks, muscadine, and flat top goldenrod (Euthamia graminifolia). Midstory consists of myrsine, cabbage palm, wild coffee, and hogplum. Canopy consists of Florida slash pine and cabbage palm. The overall condition of the plant communities within the property is good with an estimated exotic plant coverage of 10%. The dominant exotic noted is Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolia) along the edges of Trafford Oaks Rd and Rosbough Way. Once inside the perimeter, Brazilian pepper is more scattered, and native plants dominate. Some Caesarweed (Urena lobata) and Peruvian primrosewillow (Ludwigia peruviana) are present, but not in large amounts. Table 4. Listed Plant Species Common Name Scientific Name State Status Federal Status Northern needleleaf Tillandsia balbisiana State Threatened n/a Cardinal airplant Tillandsia fasciculata State Endangered n/a Butterfly orchid Encyclia tampensis Comm. Exploited n/a Catesby’s Lily Lilium catesbaei State Threatened n/a 28.A.20 Packet Pg. 906 Attachment: 5.E.1. Santamaria- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: 00052040005 and 00052120006 Owner Names: Santamaria Date: April 3, 2024 15 Figure 5 - CLIP4 Priority Natural Communities 28.A.20 Packet Pg. 907 Attachment: 5.E.1. Santamaria- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: 00052040005 and 00052120006 Owner Names: Santamaria Date: April 3, 2024 16 Figure 6 - Florida Cooperative Land Cover Classification System 28.A.20 Packet Pg. 908 Attachment: 5.E.1. Santamaria- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: 00052040005 and 00052120006 Owner Names: Santamaria Date: April 3, 2024 17 Figure 7 – Mesic Hammock Figure 8 – Wetland Forest Mixed 28.A.20 Packet Pg. 909 Attachment: 5.E.1. Santamaria- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: 00052040005 and 00052120006 Owner Names: Santamaria Date: April 3, 2024 18 3.1.2 Wildlife Communities This parcel would enhance protected habitat connectivity between the Caracara Prairie Preserve, CREW Cypress Dome Trails, CREW Marsh, and Pepper Ranch Preserve. The wetland portions including the freshwater marsh and adjacent wetland hardwoods support a significant number of wetland dependent species including imperiled wading birds, reptiles and amphibians, and freshwater snakes. These parcels include historic nesting and foraging habitat for migratory swallow-tailed kites and are utilized by large mammals such as Florida panther, Florida black bear, and bobcat. Other species observed utilizing the property are white-tailed deer, wild turkey, box turtle, and Eastern Diamondback Rattlesnake. It can be assumed that the same important, listed wildlife species documented on the adjacent CREW Lands also utilize this property including the Everglades snail kite, wood stork, and multiple bird species. FWC telemetry data documented that radio collared Florida panthers visited the property in 2008 and 2012. Table 5 – Listed Wildlife Detected Common Name Scientific Name State/Federal Status Mode of Detection American alligator Alligator mississippiensis FT (Similarity of appearance) Observed Florida panther Puma concolor coryi FE FWC Telemetry Table 6 – Potential Listed Wildlife Species Common Name Scientific Name State/Federal Status Everglades Snail Kite Rostrhamus sociabilis plumbeus FE Audubon’s Crested Caracara Polyborus plancus audubonii FT Florida bonneted bat Eumops floridanus FE Big Cypress Fox Squirrel Sciurus niger avicennia ST Sherman’s short-tailed shrew Blarina shermani ST Florida sandhill crane Antigone canadensis pratensis ST Roseate spoonbill Platalea ajaja ST Tri-colored heron Egretta tricolor ST Eastern Indigo Snake Drymarchon corais couperi FT American alligator Alligator mississippiensis FT (S/A) Wood stork Mycteria americana FT 28.A.20 Packet Pg. 910 Attachment: 5.E.1. Santamaria- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: 00052040005 and 00052120006 Owner Names: Santamaria Date: April 3, 2024 19 Figure 9 - Wildlife Spatial Data (i.e., telemetry, roosts, etc) 28.A.20 Packet Pg. 911 Attachment: 5.E.1. Santamaria- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: 00052040005 and 00052120006 Owner Names: Santamaria Date: April 3, 2024 20 Figure 10 - CLIP4 Potential Habitat Richness 28.A.20 Packet Pg. 912 Attachment: 5.E.1. Santamaria- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: 00052040005 and 00052120006 Owner Names: Santamaria Date: April 3, 2024 21 3.1.3 Water Resources Acquisition of this property would offer increased opportunity for protection of water resource values, including recharge of the aquifer and protection of wetland dependent species habitat. During a site visit during the rainy season in 2021, approximately two thirds of the site was inundated with shallow water, getting deeper toward the eastern boundaries. The terrain gently slopes west to east and transitions from unimproved pasture, to forested wetland, to freshwater marsh. A number of culverts were observed on the property which were likely put in place to reduce water levels in the unimproved pasture area for grazing. Submerged aquatic vegetation was present throughout the ground cover in most of the inundated native plant communities. Epiphytic orchids were also observed in the wetland hardwood areas. Acquisition of this parcel would add to the protection of the quality of this water source by increasing the buffering of the Corkscrew slough from development and non-point source pollution. The property also provides natural flood protection. Soils data is based on the Soil Survey of Collier County Area, Florida (USDA/NRCS, 1990). Approximately half the property is mapped as containing hydric soils “Malabar Fine Sand” - a nearly level, poorly drained soil in sloughs and poorly defined drainageways – and “Winder, Riviera, Limestone Substratum, and Chobee Soils, Depressional” – a poorly drained soil that is associated with sloughs and cypress swamps. 28.A.20 Packet Pg. 913 Attachment: 5.E.1. Santamaria- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: 00052040005 and 00052120006 Owner Names: Santamaria Date: April 3, 2024 22 Figure 11 - CLIP Aquifer Recharge Priority and Wellfield Protection Zones 28.A.20 Packet Pg. 914 Attachment: 5.E.1. Santamaria- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: 00052040005 and 00052120006 Owner Names: Santamaria Date: April 3, 2024 23 Figure 12 - Collier County Soil Survey 28.A.20 Packet Pg. 915 Attachment: 5.E.1. Santamaria- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: 00052040005 and 00052120006 Owner Names: Santamaria Date: April 3, 2024 24 Figure 13 LIDAR Elevation Map 28.A.20 Packet Pg. 916 Attachment: 5.E.1. Santamaria- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: 00052040005 and 00052120006 Owner Names: Santamaria Date: April 3, 2024 25 3.1.4 Ecosystem Connectivity Preservation and restoration of these parcels would add to the conservation land buffer protecting the Corkscrew Regional Ecosystem Watershed (CREW). This consists of over 60,000 acres of South Florida Water Management District lands. The CREW Marsh wetlands are also an ecological link and corridor into the Camp Keais Strand and other conservation lands to the south. The Florida Wildlife Corridor Foundation (a non-profit organization seeking landscape-scale conservation) identifies the Santamaria property as an Opportunity Area - high priority land that connects and supports parks, preserves, and refuges. Figure 14 - Florida Wildlife Corridor and Santamaria 28.A.20 Packet Pg. 917 Attachment: 5.E.1. Santamaria- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: 00052040005 and 00052120006 Owner Names: Santamaria Date: April 3, 2024 26 Figure 15 - Conservation Lands 28.A.20 Packet Pg. 918 Attachment: 5.E.1. Santamaria- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: 00052040005 and 00052120006 Owner Names: Santamaria Date: April 3, 2024 27 3.2 Human Values 3.2.1 Recreation This property is adjacent to state-protected lands of the CREW Management Area CREW Marsh Unit. Trails within the property could be incorporated into the CREW Cypress Dome Yellow Public hiking, biking and equestrian trails. There is also the potential to incorporate the property into the CREW Wildlife Environmental Area (WEA) for hunting. CREW Land and Water Trust is potentially interested in partnering with Conservation Collier to acquire the home and screened in building on the property in order to have dedicated indoor space where they can hold environmental education programs. 3.2.2 Accessibility This site can be accessed year-round from Whidden Loop Rd, via an access gate and elevated roadway. The site can also be accessed via the CREW Cypress Dome Yellow Trail via an existing gate in the boundary fence between the properties. 3.2.3 Aesthetic/Cultural Enhancement The parcels contain large, mature oak trees and marsh and pasture vistas. The structures on the property are historic, built in the 1920’s, but renovated and expanded over the years. There are two pole barns (one with an attached screened in area with 2nd story air-conditioned room and restroom), one storage shed, and one home (with kitchen, bathroom with shower and washer/dryer, living room, bedroom, and 2 screened in porches). Figure 16 - View of the Santamaria parcels from the CREW Cypress Dome Trails 28.A.20 Packet Pg. 919 Attachment: 5.E.1. Santamaria- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: 00052040005 and 00052120006 Owner Names: Santamaria Date: April 3, 2024 28 Figure 17 – Aerial views of Santamaria structures Pole Barn Pole Barn Screened-in area House Shed Shed House 28.A.20 Packet Pg. 920 Attachment: 5.E.1. Santamaria- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: 00052040005 and 00052120006 Owner Names: Santamaria Date: April 3, 2024 29 3.3 Restoration and Management 3.3.1 Vegetation Management 3.3.1.1 Invasive Vegetation Density of invasive, exotic species is low at this site with the species of greatest coverage being Caesar’s weed in the unimproved pastures, low levels of Brazilian pepper, and one observation of Lygodium spp. The exotic species density, size and coverage appeared to be suitable for an initial “treat in place” approach with some mild mechanical work potentially needed to address the small treated Brazilian pepper piles within the south parcel depending on public access plans/ preserve aesthetics priorities. Maintenance treatments at regular intervals would be needed to keep the exotic plant species coverage low. Much of the grass species within the pasture area is non-native and serves to support the cattle grazing on the property, but also provides habitat for species like wild turkey, Florida sandhill crane, and potentially crested caracara. Restoration of the unimproved pastures to native ground cover or canopy replanting is a potential land management activity that could be undertaken. 3.3.1.2 Prescribed Fire The parcels contain fire dependent communities; however, fire line installation and some fuel reduction would need to occur prior to burning. 3.3.2 Remediation and Site Security No site security issues appear to exist within the parcels. 3.3.3 Assistance There is the potential for prescribed fire assistance from SFWMD and FWC staff, as the property is adjacent to SFWMD managed lands. There is also the potential for incorporation into the CREW WEA for hunt management assistance. 28.A.20 Packet Pg. 921 Attachment: 5.E.1. Santamaria- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: 00052040005 and 00052120006 Owner Names: Santamaria Date: April 3, 2024 30 3.4 Vulnerability 3.4.1 Zoning and Land Use The parcel is zoned A-MHO (Agricultural – Mobile Home Overlay), which allows for 1 unit per 5 acres. Figure 18 – Zoning 28.A.20 Packet Pg. 922 Attachment: 5.E.1. Santamaria- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: 00052040005 and 00052120006 Owner Names: Santamaria Date: April 3, 2024 31 Figure 19 –Future Land Use 28.A.20 Packet Pg. 923 Attachment: 5.E.1. Santamaria- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: 00052040005 and 00052120006 Owner Names: Santamaria Date: April 3, 2024 32 3.4.2 Development Plans The property is not currently planned for development. 4. Acquisition Considerations Staff would like to bring the following items to the attention of the Advisory Committee during the review of this property. The following items may not have significantly affected the scoring but are worth noting. Four structures exist on the parcel, three of which can be utilized by Collier County (2 pole barns and shed) and two of which can potentially be utilized by CREW Land and Water Trust (Screened in area and house). Due to the historic uses of the property, staff recommends a Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment prior to acquisition. 5. Management Needs and Costs Table 7 - Estimated Costs of Site Remediation, Improvements, and Management Management Element Initial Cost Annual Recurring Cost Comments Invasive Vegetation Removal $12,000 $9,000 Initial cost estimated at $200/acre with recurring estimated at $150/acre based on minimal exotics and comparative pricing at Caracara Prairie Preserve. Trails $5,000 $250 Initial installation of an access gate and trail cutting. Annual recurring cost represents in-house mowing or minimal repairs Fencing $8,000 $500 Initial fencing cost represents an estimate to remove the existing fence through the center of the parcels put in place to facilitate cattle grazing. Removing the fence would provide more habitat connectivity and reduce maintenance costs over time. Boundary fencing may need routine maintenance overtime. Debris Removal $1,000 $0 Initial cost to remove two piles where Brazillian pepper was historically treated and stacked. Signs $2,500 $100 Preserve entrance sign and educational materials. Maintenance costs to maintain trail marker signs. Other $1,500 Redesigning/reprinting public access brochures and maps Maintenance of Structures TBD TBD Structures appear to be in good condition; Collier County’s costs to maintain will depend on CREW Land and Water Trust’s level of structure ownership. Utilities (electricity, water, and sewer) TBD TBD Collier County’s costs will depend on CREW Land and Water Trust’s level of structure ownership. TOTAL $30,000 $9,850 28.A.20 Packet Pg. 924 Attachment: 5.E.1. Santamaria- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: 00052040005 and 00052120006 Owner Names: Santamaria Date: April 3, 2024 33 6. Potential for Matching Funds The primary partnering agencies for conservation acquisitions, and those identified in the ordinance are the Florida Communities Trust (FCT) and The Florida Forever Program. The following highlights potential for partnering funds, as communicated by agency staff. Florida Communities Trust - Parks and Open Space Florida Forever grant program: The FCT Parks and Open Space Florida Forever grant program provides grant funds to local governments and nonprofit organizations to acquire conservation lands, urban open spaces, parks and greenways. Application for this program is typically made for pre-acquired sites up to two years from the time of acquisition. The Parks and Open Space Florida Forever grant program assists the Department of Environmental Protection in helping communities meet the challenges of growth, supporting viable community development and protecting natural resources and open space. The program receives 21 percent Florida Forever appropriation. This property would not be a good candidate for FCT funding. Florida Forever Program: Although this parcel is within a Florida Forever Program boundary, because of its size, the State will not pursue its acquisition. Additional Funding Sources: There is potential for partnership with the CREW Land and Water Trust on acquisition of the house and screened in area of the pole barn. 28.A.20 Packet Pg. 925 Attachment: 5.E.1. Santamaria- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: 00052040005 and 00052120006 Owner Names: Santamaria Date: April 3, 2024 34 7. Secondary Criteria Scoring Form Property Name: Santamaria Target Protection Mailing Area: Caracara Folio(s): 00052040005 and 00052120006 Secondary Criteria Scoring Possible Points Awarded Points Percentage 1 - Ecological Value 160 117 73 2 - Human Value 80 57 71 3 - Restoration and Management 80 80 100 4 - Vulnerability 80 56 69 TOTAL SCORE 400 310 78 1 - ECOLOGICAL VALUES (40% of total) Possible Points Awarded Points Comments 1.1 VEGETATIVE COMMUNITIES 200 150 1.1.1 - Priority natural communities (Select highest score) a. Parcel contains CLIP4 Priority 1 communities (1130 - Rockland Hammock, 1210 - Scrub, 1213 - Sand Pine Scrub, 1214 - Coastal Scrub, 1312 - Scrubby Flatwoods, 1610 - Beach Dune, 1620 - Coastal Berm, 1630 - Coastal Grasslands, 1640 - Coastal Strand, or 1650 - Maritime Hammock) 100 b. Parcel contains CLIP4 Priority 2 communities (22211 - Hydric Pine Flatwoods, 2221 - Wet Flatwoods, or 1311 - Mesic Flatwoods) 60 60 Hydric Pine Flatwoods c. Parcel contains CLIP4 Priority 3 communities (5250 - Mangrove Swamp, or 5240 - Salt Marsh) 50 d. Parcel contains CLIP4 Priority 4 communities (5250 - Mangrove Swamp) 25 1.1.2 - Plant community diversity (Select the highest score) a. Parcel has ≥ 3 CLC native plant communities (Florida Cooperative Land Cover Classification System native plant communities) 20 20 b. Parcel has ≤ 2 CLC native plant communities 10 c. Parcel has 0 CLC native plant communities 0 1.1.3 - Listed plant species (excluding commercially exploited species) (Select the highest score) a. Parcel has ≥5 CLC listed plant species 30 b. Parcel has 3-4 CLC listed plant species 20 20 T. fasciculata, T. balbisiana, and butterfly orchid c. Parcel has ≤ 2 CLC listed plant species 10 d. Parcel has 0 CLC listed plant species 0 1.1.4 - Invasive Plant Infestation (Select highest score) a. 0 - 10% infestation 50 50 28.A.20 Packet Pg. 926 Attachment: 5.E.1. Santamaria- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: 00052040005 and 00052120006 Owner Names: Santamaria Date: April 3, 2024 35 b. 10 - 25% infestation 40 c. 25 - 50% infestation 30 d. 50 - 75% infestation 20 e. ≥75% infestation 10 1.2 - WILDLIFE COMMUNITIES 100 100 1.2.1 - Listed wildlife species (Select the highest score) a. Listed wildlife species documented on the parcel 80 80 b. Listed wildlife species documented on adjacent property 60 c CLIP Potential Habitat Richness ≥5 species 40 d. No listed wildlife documented near parcel 0 1.2.2 - Significant wildlife habitat (Rookeries, roosts, denning sites, nesting grounds, high population densities, etc) (Select highest score) a. Parcel protects significant wildlife habitat (Please describe) 20 20 b. Parcel enhances adjacent to significant wildlife habitat (Please describe) 10 c. Parcel does not enhance significant wildlife habitat 0 1.3 - WATER RESOURCES 100 65 1.3.1 - Aquifer recharge (Select the highest score) a. Parcel is located within a wellfield protection zone or within a CLIP4 Aquifer Recharge Priority 1 area 40 b. Parcel is located within a CLIP4 Aquifer Recharge Priority 2 or 3 area 30 30 c. Parcel is located within a CLIP4 Aquifer Recharge Priority 4 or 5 area 20 d. Parcel is located within a CLIP4 Aquifer Recharge Priority 6 area 0 1.3.2 - Surface Water Protection (Select the highest score) a. Parcel is contiguous with and provides buffering for an Outstanding Florida Waterbody 30 b. Parcel is contiguous with and provides buffering for a creek, river, lake, canal or other surface water body 20 c. Parcel is contiguous with and provides buffering for an identified flowway 15 15 d. Wetlands exist on site 10 e. Parcel does not provide opportunities for surface water quality enhancement 0 1.3.3 - Floodplain Management (Select all that apply) a. Parcel has depressional or slough soils 10 10 b. Parcel has known history of flooding and is likely to provide onsite water attenuation 10 10 c. Parcel provides storm surge buffering 10 d. Parcel does not provide floodplain management benefits 0 1.4 - ECOSYSTEM CONNECTIVITY 200 125 28.A.20 Packet Pg. 927 Attachment: 5.E.1. Santamaria- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: 00052040005 and 00052120006 Owner Names: Santamaria Date: April 3, 2024 36 1.4.1 - Acreage (Select Highest Score) a. Parcel is ≥ 300 acres 150 b. Parcel is ≥ 100 acres 100 b. Parcel is ≥ 50 acres 75 75 c. Parcel is ≥ 25 acres 25 d. Parcel is ≥ 10 acres 15 e. Parcel is < 10 acres 0 1.4.2 - Connectivity (Select highest score) a. Parcel is immediately contiguous with conservation lands 50 50 b. Parcel is not immediately contiguous, but parcels between it and nearby conservation lands are undeveloped 25 c. Parcel is isolated from conservation land 0 ECOLOGICAL VALUES TOTAL POINTS 600 440 ECOLOGICAL VALUES WEIGHTED SCORE (Awarded Points/Possible Points*160) 160 117 2 - HUMAN VALUES (20%) Possible Points Awarded Points Comments 2.1 - RECREATION 120 80 2.1.1 - Compatible recreation activities (Select all that apply) a. Hunting 20 20 b. Fishing 20 c. Water-based recreation (paddling, swimming, etc) 20 d. Biking 20 20 e. Equestrian 20 20 f. Passive natural-resource based recreation (Hiking, photography, wildlife watching, environmental education, etc) 20 20 g. Parcel is incompatible with nature-based recreation 0 2.2 - ACCESSIBILITY 120 90 2.2.1 - Seasonality (Select the highest score) a. Parcel accessible for land-based recreation year round 20 20 b. Parcel accessible for land-based recreation seasonally 10 c. Parcel is inaccessible for land-based recreation 0 2.2.2 - Vehicle access (Select the highest score) a. Public access via paved road 50 50 b. Public access via unpaved road 30 c. Public access via private road 20 d. No public access 0 2.2.3 - Parking Availability (Select the highest score) a. Minor improvements necessary to provide on-site parking 40 b. Major improvements necessary to provide on-site parking (Requires site development plan) 25 28.A.20 Packet Pg. 928 Attachment: 5.E.1. Santamaria- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: 00052040005 and 00052120006 Owner Names: Santamaria Date: April 3, 2024 37 b. Public parking available nearby or on adjacent preserve 20 20 c. Street parking available 10 d. No public parking available 0 2.2.4 - Pedestrian access (Select the highest score) a. Parcel is easily accessible to pedestrians (within walking distance of housing development) 10 b. Parcel is not easily accessible to pedestrians 0 0 2.3 - AESTHETICS/CULTURAL ENHANCEMENT 40 30 2.3.1 - Aesthetic/cultural value (Choose all that apply) a. Mature/outstanding native vegetation 5 5 b. Scenic vistas 5 c. Frontage enhances aesthetics of public thoroughfare 10 10 d. Archaeological/historical structures present 15 15 e. Other (Please describe) 5 f. None 0 HUMAN VALUES TOTAL SCORE 280 200 HUMAN VALUES WEIGHTED SCORE (Awarded Points/Possible Points*80) 80 57 3 - RESTORATION AND MANAGEMENT (20%) Possible Points Awarded Points Comments 3.1 - VEGETATION MANAGEMENT 120 120 3.1.1 - Invasive plant management needs (Select the highest score) a. Minimal invasive/nuisance plant management necessary to restore and maintain native plant communities (<30%) 100 100 b. Moderate invasive/nuisance plant management necessary to restore and maintain native plant communities (30-65%) 75 c. Major invasive/nuisance plant management necessary to restore and maintain native plant communities (>65%) 50 d. Major invasive/nuisance plant management and replanting necessary to restore and maintain native plant communities (>65%) 25 e. Restoration of native plant community not feasible 0 3.1.2 - Prescribed fire necessity and compatibility (Select the highest score) a. Parcel contains fire dependent plant communities and is compatible with prescribed fire or parcel does not contain fire dependent plant communities 20 20 b. Parcel contains fire dependent plant communities and is incompatible with prescribed fire 0 3.2 - REMEDIATION AND SITE SECURITY 50 50 3.2.1 - Site remediation and human conflict potential (Dumping, contamination, trespassing, vandalism, other) (Select the highest score) 28.A.20 Packet Pg. 929 Attachment: 5.E.1. Santamaria- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: 00052040005 and 00052120006 Owner Names: Santamaria Date: April 3, 2024 38 a. Minimal site remediation or human conflict issues predicted 50 50 b. Moderate site remediation or human conflict issues predicted (Please describe) 20 c. Major site remediation or human conflict issues predicted (Please describe) 5 d. Resolving site remediation or human conflict issues not feasible 0 3.3 - ASSISTANCE 5 5 3.3.1 - Management assistance by other entity a. Management assistance by other entity likely 5 5 SFWMD and FWC b. Management assistance by other entity unlikely 0 RESTORATION AND MANAGEMENT TOTAL SCORE 175 175 RESTORATION AND MANAGEMENT WEIGHTED SCORE (Awarded Points/Possible Points*80) 80 80 4 - VULNERABILITY (20%) Possible Points Awarded Points Comments 4.1 - ZONING AND LAND USE 130 100 4.1.1 - Zoning and land use designation (Select the highest score) a. Zoning allows for Single Family, Multifamily, industrial or commercial 100 b. Zoning allows for density of no greater than 1 unit per 5 acres 75 75 c. Zoning allows for agricultural use /density of no greater than 1 unit per 40 acres 50 d. Zoning favors stewardship or conservation 0 4.1.2 - Future Land Use Type (Select the highest score) a. Parcel designated Urban 30 b. Parcel designated Estates, Rural Fringe Receiving and Neutral, Agriculture 25 25 c. Parcel designated Rural Fringe Sending, Rural Lands Stewardship Area 5 d. Parcel is designated Conservation 0 4.2 - DEVELOPMENT PLANS 50 25 4.2.1 - Development plans (Select the highest score) a. Parcel has been approved for development 20 b. SFWMD and/or USACOE permit has been applied for or SDP application has been submitted 15 c. Parcel has no current development plans 0 0 4.2.2 - Site characteristics amenable to development (Select all that apply) a. Parcel is primarily upland 10 b. Parcel is along a major roadway 10 10 28.A.20 Packet Pg. 930 Attachment: 5.E.1. Santamaria- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: 00052040005 and 00052120006 Owner Names: Santamaria Date: April 3, 2024 39 c. Parcel is >10 acres 5 10 d. Parcel is within 1 mile of a current or planned commercial or multi-unit residential development 5 5 VULNERABILITY TOTAL SCORE 180 125 VULNERABILITY WEIGHTED SCORE (Awarded Points/Possible Points*80) 80 56 28.A.20 Packet Pg. 931 Attachment: 5.E.1. Santamaria- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: 00052040005 and 00052120006 Owner Names: Santamaria Date: April 3, 2024 40 8. Additional Site Photos View of property looking southwest View of property looking east 28.A.20 Packet Pg. 932 Attachment: 5.E.1. Santamaria- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: 00052040005 and 00052120006 Owner Names: Santamaria Date: April 3, 2024 41 View of property looking southeast Reflexed wild pine (Tillandsia balbisiana) Florida butterfly orchid (Encyclia tampensis) 28.A.20 Packet Pg. 933 Attachment: 5.E.1. Santamaria- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: 00052040005 and 00052120006 Owner Names: Santamaria Date: April 3, 2024 42 Caesarweed in pasture at base of trees One patch of Lygodium spp found at edge of pasture Stand of Brazilian pepper found at edge of pasture Mixed Shrub Wetlands 28.A.20 Packet Pg. 934 Attachment: 5.E.1. Santamaria- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: 00052040005 and 00052120006 Owner Names: Santamaria Date: April 3, 2024 43 Unimproved pasture Unimproved pasture Mixed Wetland Hardwoods Mixed Wetland Hardwoods 28.A.20 Packet Pg. 935 Attachment: 5.E.1. Santamaria- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: 00052040005 and 00052120006 Owner Names: Santamaria Date: April 3, 2024 44 Hydric Pine Flatwoods Freshwater Marsh- view from CREW Marsh 28.A.20 Packet Pg. 936 Attachment: 5.E.1. Santamaria- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: 00052040005 and 00052120006 Owner Names: Santamaria Date: April 3, 2024 45 Pole barns Pole barn with adjoining screened in area 28.A.20 Packet Pg. 937 Attachment: 5.E.1. Santamaria- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: 00052040005 and 00052120006 Owner Names: Santamaria Date: April 3, 2024 46 Screened in area and upstairs air-conditioned room 28.A.20 Packet Pg. 938 Attachment: 5.E.1. Santamaria- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: 00052040005 and 00052120006 Owner Names: Santamaria Date: April 3, 2024 47 Shed House 28.A.20 Packet Pg. 939 Attachment: 5.E.1. Santamaria- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: 00052040005 and 00052120006 Owner Names: Santamaria Date: April 3, 2024 48 Front port Kitchen looking west Kitchen looking east Dining room Living room Back porch 28.A.20 Packet Pg. 940 Attachment: 5.E.1. Santamaria- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: 00052040005 and 00052120006 Owner Names: Santamaria Date: April 3, 2024 49 View from Living room into Dining room View into bedroom with bathroom beyond Bedroom Bathroom Bathroom 28.A.20 Packet Pg. 941 Attachment: 5.E.1. Santamaria- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: 00052040005 and 00052120006 Owner Names: Santamaria Date: April 3, 2024 50 APPENDIX 1 – Critical Lands and Water Identification Maps (CLIP) Definitions This report makes use of data layers from the Florida Natural Areas Inventory and University of Florida Critical Lands and Waters Identification Project (CLIP4). CLIP4 is a collection of spatial data that identify statewide priorities for a broad range of natural resources in Florida. It was developed through a collaborative effort between the Florida Areas Natural Inventory (FNAI), the University of Florida GeoPlan Center and Center for Landscape Conservation Planning, and the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC). It is used in the Florida Forever Program to evaluate properties for acquisition. CLIP4 is organized into a set of core natural resource data layers which are representative of 5 resource categories: biodiversity, landscapes, surface water, groundwater and marine. The first 3 categories have also been combined into the Aggregated layer, which identifies 5 priority levels for natural resource conservation. Below is a description of each of the three CLIP4 data layers used in this report. Figure 5 - CLIP4 Priority Natural Communities Consists of 12 priority natural community types: upland glades, pine rocklands, seepage slopes, scrub, sandhill, sandhill upland lakes, rockland hammock, coastal uplands, imperiled coastal lakes, dry prairie, upland pine, pine flatwoods, upland hardwood forest, or coastal wetlands. These natural communities are prioritized by a combination of their heritage global status rank (G-rank) and landscape context, based on the Land Use Intensity Index (subset of CLIP Landscape Integrity Index) and FNAI Potential Natural Areas. Priority 1 includes G1-G3 communities with Very High or High landscape context. Priority 2 includes G1-G3 Medium and G4 Very High/High. Priority 3 includes G4 Medium and G5 Very High/High. Priority 5 is G5 Medium. This data layer was created by FNAI originally to inform the Florida Forever environmental land acquisition program. The natural communities were mapped primarily based on the FNAI/FWC Cooperative Land Cover (CLC) data layer, which is a compilation of best-available land cover data for the entire state. The CLC is based on both remote-sensed (from aerial photography, primarily from water management district FLUCCS data) and ground-truthed (from field surveys on many conservation lands) data. Figure 10 - Potential Habitat Richness CLIP4 Map This CLIP version 4.0 data layer is unchanged from CLIP v3.0. FWC Potential Habitat Richness. Because SHCAs do not address species richness, FWC also developed the potential habitat richness layer to identify areas of overlapping vertebrate species habitat. FWC created a statewide potential habitat model for each species included in their analysis. In some cases, only a portion of the potential habitat was ultimately designated as SHCA for each species. The Potential Habitat Richness layer includes the entire potential habitat model for each species and provides a count of the number of species habitat models occurring at each location. The highest number of focal species co-occurring at any location in the model is 13. 28.A.20 Packet Pg. 942 Attachment: 5.E.1. Santamaria- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: 00052040005 and 00052120006 Owner Names: Santamaria Date: April 3, 2024 51 Figure 11 - CLIP4 Aquifer Recharge Priority and Wellfield Protection Zones High priorities indicate high potential for recharge to an underlying aquifer system (typically the Floridan aquifer but could be intermediate or surficial aquifers in some portions of the state). The highest priorities indicate high potential for recharge to springs or public water supplies. This figure also includes Wellfield Protection Zones. Collier County Wellfield Protection Zones are referenced in the Land Development Code and updated in 2010 by Pollution Control and Prevention Department Staff. The public water supply wellfields, identified in section 3.06.06 and permitted by the SFWMD for potable water to withdraw a minimum of 100,000 average gallons per day (GPD), are identified as protected wellfields, around which specific land use and activity (regulated development) shall be regulated under this section. 28.A.20 Packet Pg. 943 Attachment: 5.E.1. Santamaria- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Conservation Collier Initial Criteria Screening Report Williams Farms Owner Name: James E Williams Jr. Trust, Williams Farms, Williams Farms Land Assets LLC, Williams Farms of Immokalee Size: Approximately 1,167 acres Folio Number(s): 00113560000, 00113600009, 00113600106, 00131760002, 00132680000, & 00132680107 and portions of 00114160001, 00131720000, 00132640008, & 00132720009 Staff Report Date: April 3, 2024 133 66 37 56 160 80 80 80 0 50 100 150 200 1 - Ecological Value 2 - Human Value 3 - Restoration and Management 4 - Vulnerability Total Score: 291/400 Awarded Points Possible Points 28.A.21 Packet Pg. 944 Attachment: 5.E.2. Williams Farms- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: multiple Project Name: Williams Farms Date: April 3, 2024 2 Table of Contents Table of Contents ......................................................................................................................................... 2 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 4 2. Summary of Property ............................................................................................................................ 5 Figure 1 - Parcels Location Overview .......................................................................................................5 Figure 2 – Complete Williams Farms property .........................................................................................6 Figure 3 – Parcels Close-up – Williams Farms Proposed for Conservation Collier ...................................7 2.1 Summary of Property Information ....................................................................................................8 Table 1 – Summary of Property Information .....................................................................................8 Figure 4 - Secondary Criteria Score ................................................................................................. 10 Table 2 - Secondary Criteria Score Summary .................................................................................. 10 2.2 Summary of Assessed Value and Property Cost Estimates ........................................................... 11 Table 3. Assessed & Estimated Value ............................................................................................. 11 2.2.1 Zoning, Growth Management and Conservation Overlays ................................................. 12 2.3 Initial Screening Criteria Satisfaction (Ord. 2002-63, Sec. 12) ...................................................... 12 3. Initial Screening Criteria ...................................................................................................................... 14 3.1 Ecological Values ............................................................................................................................. 14 3.1.1 Vegetative Communities ....................................................................................................... 14 Table 4. Listed Plant Species.................................................................................................... 15 Figure 5 - CLIP4 Priority Natural Communities ........................................................................ 16 Figure 6 - Florida Cooperative Land Cover Classification System ............................................ 17 Figure 7 - Cypress .................................................................................................................... 18 Figure 8 – Mixed Wetland Hardwoods .................................................................................... 18 3.1.2 Wildlife Communities ............................................................................................................ 19 Table 5 – Listed Wildlife Detected ........................................................................................... 19 Table 6 – Potential Listed Wildlife Species .............................................................................. 19 Figure 9 - Wildlife Spatial Data (i.e., telemetry, roosts, etc) .................................................... 20 Figure 10 - CLIP4 Potential Habitat Richness ........................................................................... 21 3.1.3 Water Resources ................................................................................................................... 22 Figure 11 - CLIP Aquifer Recharge Priority and Wellfield Protection Zones ............................ 23 Figure 12 - Collier County Soil Survey ...................................................................................... 24 Figure 13 LIDAR Elevation Map ............................................................................................... 25 3.1.4 Ecosystem Connectivity ........................................................................................................ 26 28.A.21 Packet Pg. 945 Attachment: 5.E.2. Williams Farms- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: multiple Project Name: Williams Farms Date: April 3, 2024 3 Figure 14 – FL Wildlife Corridor and Williams Farms ............................................................... 26 Figure 15 - Conservation Lands ............................................................................................... 27 3.2 Human Values ................................................................................................................................. 28 3.2.1 Recreation ............................................................................................................................. 28 3.2.2 Accessibility ........................................................................................................................... 28 3.2.3 Aesthetic/Cultural Enhancement ......................................................................................... 28 3.3 Restoration and Management ....................................................................................................... 28 3.3.1 Vegetation Management ...................................................................................................... 28 3.3.1.1 Invasive Vegetation ..................................................................................................... 28 3.3.1.2 Prescribed Fire ............................................................................................................ 28 3.3.2 Remediation and Site Security .............................................................................................. 28 3.3.3 Assistance .............................................................................................................................. 29 3.4 Vulnerability .................................................................................................................................... 29 3.4.1 Zoning and Land Use ............................................................................................................. 29 Figure 16 – Zoning ................................................................................................................... 30 Figure 17 – RLSA Overlay ......................................................................................................... 31 Figure 18 –Future Land Use .................................................................................................... 32 3.4.2 Development Plans ............................................................................................................... 33 4. Acquisition Considerations .................................................................................................................. 33 5. Management Needs and Costs .............................................................................................................. 34 Table 7 - Estimated Costs of Site Remediation, Improvements, and Management ................ 34 6. Potential for Matching Funds ............................................................................................................... 35 7. Secondary Criteria Scoring Form ......................................................................................................... 36 8. Additional Site Photos ......................................................................................................................... 42 APPENDIX 1 – Critical Lands and Water Identification Maps (CLIP) Definitions ...................................... 46 28.A.21 Packet Pg. 946 Attachment: 5.E.2. Williams Farms- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: multiple Project Name: Williams Farms Date: April 3, 2024 4 1. Introduction The Conservation Collier Program (Program) is an environmentally sensitive land acquisition and management program approved by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners (Board) in 2002 and by Collier County Voters in 2002 and 2006. The Program was active in acquisition between 2003 and 2011, under the terms of the referendum. Between 2011 and 2016, the Program was in management mode. In 2017, the Collier County Board reauthorized Conservation Collier to seek additional lands (2/14/17, Agenda Item 11B). On November 3, 2020, the Collier County electors approved the Conservation Collier Re-establishment referendum with a 76.5% majority. This Initial Criteria Screening Report (ICSR) has been prepared for the Conservation Collier to meet requirements specified in the Conservation Collier Implementation Ordinance, 2002-63, as amended, and for purposes of the Conservation Collier Program. The sole purpose of this report is to provide objective data to demonstrate how properties meet the criteria defined by the ordinance. The following sections characterize the property location and assessed value, elaborate on the initial and secondary screening criteria scoring, and describe potential funding sources, appropriate use, site improvements, and estimated management costs. 28.A.21 Packet Pg. 947 Attachment: 5.E.2. Williams Farms- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: multiple Project Name: Williams Farms Date: April 3, 2024 5 2. Summary of Property Figure 1 - Parcels Location Overview 28.A.21 Packet Pg. 948 Attachment: 5.E.2. Williams Farms- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: multiple Project Name: Williams Farms Date: April 3, 2024 6 Figure 2 – Complete Williams Farms property 28.A.21 Packet Pg. 949 Attachment: 5.E.2. Williams Farms- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: multiple Project Name: Williams Farms Date: April 3, 2024 7 Figure 3 – Parcels Close-up – Williams Farms Proposed for Conservation Collier 28.A.21 Packet Pg. 950 Attachment: 5.E.2. Williams Farms- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: multiple Project Name: Williams Farms Date: April 3, 2024 8 2.1 Summary of Property Information Table 1 – Summary of Property Information Characteristic Value Comments Name Williams Farms James E Williams Jr. Trust, Williams Farms, Williams Farms Land Assets LLC, Williams Farms of Immokalee Folio Number Multiple 00113560000, 00113600009, 00113600106, 00131760002, 00132680000, & 00132680107 and portions of 00114160001, 00131720000, 00132640008, & 00132720009 Target Protection Area (Ord. 2002-63, Section 10.3) RLSA – FSA, HSA Although the property is not within a Target Protection Mailing Area, it does contain some areas designated as Rural Land Stewardship Area (RLSA) Flowway Stewardship Area (FSA) and Habitat Stewardship Area (HSA) Size Approx. 1,167 acres Entire 2,247-acre Williams Farms property is being offered to the Collier County Board of County Commissioners; Conservation Collier would acquire approximately 1,167 acres Section, Township, and Range S19, T46S, R28E Zoning Category/TDRs/ Overlays A-MHO and RLSA - FSA, HSA, Open lands, and 500ft Buffer designations 834.9 ac. zoned Agricultural with Mobile Home Overlay (1 unit / 5 ac.) - Urban Residential Subdistrict FLU; 332.1 ac zoned RLSA with 176.1 ac FSA, 78.6 ac. HSA, 63.9 Open lands, and 13.5 ac. 500ft Buffer – Agricultural/Rural Mixed Use District/RLSA FLU FEMA Flood Map Category Primarily AH and AE with some small areas of X and X500 AH - Area close to water hazard that has a 1% chance of experiencing shallow flooding between 1 and 3 feet each year; AE – Area presenting a 1% annual chance of flooding and a 26% chance over the life of a 30-year mortgage; X - Area determined to be outside the 500-year flood; X500 - Area inundated by 1% annual flooding with average depths of less than 1 foot Existing structures Pole barn, cattle pens, power lines A large pole barn exists within the area of the property of interest to Conservation Collier. Cattle pens and cattle infrastructure also exist on the property. Electrical lines run along the internal roads to the farming operation. Adjoining properties and their Uses Conservation, row crops and orange groves; Residential single family, PUD, and Utility (Immokalee Water and Sewer District settling ponds and spray fields); roadway SSA 13 and undeveloped natural land adjacent along the shoreline of Lake Trafford to the west; Row crops and orange groves along the western side of the south boundary; Immokalee Water and Sewer District offices, wells, and spray fields along the eastern side of 28.A.21 Packet Pg. 951 Attachment: 5.E.2. Williams Farms- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: multiple Project Name: Williams Farms Date: April 3, 2024 9 the southern boundary; undeveloped and developed PUD, single family homes and Lake Trafford Rd. to the north; single family homes and undeveloped land to the east Development Plans Submitted None None on portions of property of interest to Conservation Collier Known Property Irregularities Ditching Historic ditching within slough and wetlands leading to Lake Trafford Other County Dept Interest Multiple Acquisition of the entire property would be of interest to multiple Collier County Divisions. Some of the property of interest to Conservation Collier could ultimately be acquired by different County Divisions 28.A.21 Packet Pg. 952 Attachment: 5.E.2. Williams Farms- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: multiple Project Name: Williams Farms Date: April 3, 2024 10 Figure 4 - Secondary Criteria Score Table 2 - Secondary Criteria Score Summary Criteria Awarded Weighted Points Possible Weighted Points Awarded/Possible Points 1 - Ecological Value 133 160 83% 1.1 - Vegetative Communities 32 53 60% 1.2 - Wildlife Communities 27 27 100% 1.3 - Water Resources 21 27 80% 1.4 - Ecosystem Connectivity 53 53 100% 2 - Human Values 66 80 82% 2.1 - Recreation 29 34 83% 2.2 - Accessibility 31 34 92% 2.3 - Aesthetics/Cultural Enhancement 6 11 50% 3 - Restoration and Management 37 80 46% 3.1 - Vegetation Management 34 55 63% 3.2 - Remediation and Site Security 2 23 10% 3.3 - Assistance 0 2 0% 4 - Vulnerability 56 80 69% 4.1 - Zoning and Land Use 47 58 81% 4.2 - Development Plans 9 22 40% Total 291 400 73% 133 66 37 56 160 80 80 80 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 1 - Ecological Value 2 - Human Value 3 - Restoration and Management 4 - Vulnerability Total Score: 291/400 Awarded Points Possible Points 28.A.21 Packet Pg. 953 Attachment: 5.E.2. Williams Farms- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: multiple Project Name: Williams Farms Date: April 3, 2024 11 2.2 Summary of Assessed Value and Property Cost Estimates The interest being appraised is fee simple “as is” for the purchase of the site. A value of the parcel will estimated using only one of the three traditional approaches to value, the sales comparison approach. It is based on the principal of substitution that an informed purchaser would pay no more for the rights in acquiring a particular real property than the cost of acquiring, without undue delay, an equally desirable one. Three properties were selected for comparison, each with similar site characteristics, utility availability, zoning classification and road access. No inspection was made of the property or comparables used in this report and the Real Estate Services Department staff relies upon information solely provided by program staff. The valuation conclusion is limited only by the reported assumptions and conditions that no other known or unknown adverse conditions exist. If the Board of County Commissioners choose to acquire this property, appraisals by two independent Real Estate Appraisers will be obtained at that time. Pursuant to the Conservation Collier Purchase Policy, two appraisals are required for the Williams Farms property, which has an initial valuation over $500,000; 2 independent Real Estate Appraiser will value the subject property and the average of those 2 appraisal reports will determine the actual value of the subject property and will be used to determine the offer made on the subject property. Table 3. Assessed & Estimated Value Property owner Folio Number Approx. Acreage Assessed Value* Estimated Value** Williams Farms 00113560000 160.0 $437,538 $1,141,760.00 Williams Farms 00113600009 50.9 $101,800 $363,222.40 James E Williams Jr. Trust 00113600106 109.1 $218,200 $778,537.60 Williams Farms Land Assets LLC 00131760002 39.0 $643,505 $278,304.00 Williams Farms of Immokalee 00132680000 39.0 $196,350 $278,304.00 James E Williams Jr. Trust 00132680107 126.1 $252,180 $899,849.60 Williams Farms Portion of 00114160001 127.8 $836,198 $911,980.80 Williams Farms Land Assets LLC Portion of 00131720000 216.1 $893,144 $1,542,089.60 Williams Farms Portion of 00132640008 259.9 $1,128,954 $1,854,646.40 Williams Farms Portion of 00132720009 39.1 $325,141 $279,017.60 TOTAL 1,167.0 $5,033,010 $8,327,712.00 * Assessed Value is obtained from the Property Appraiser’s Website. The Assessed Value is based off the current use of the property. **The Estimated Market Value for the Williams Farms property was obtained from the Collier County Real Estate Services Department in March 2024. 28.A.21 Packet Pg. 954 Attachment: 5.E.2. Williams Farms- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: multiple Project Name: Williams Farms Date: April 3, 2024 12 2.2.1 Zoning, Growth Management and Conservation Overlays Zoning, growth management and conservation overlays will affect the value of a parcel. The parcel is zoned A-MHO (Agricultural – Mobile Home Overlay), which allows for 1 unit per 5 acres. It is designated as Conservation on the Future Land Use map. Approximately 332.1 ac are within the RLSA with 176.1 ac. FSA, 78.6 ac. HSA, 63.9 ac. Open lands, and 13.5 ac. 500ft Buffer. 2.3 Initial Screening Criteria Satisfaction (Ord. 2002-63, Sec. 12) Criteria 1: CLIP Priority 1 Natural Communities Are Upland Hardwood Forest, Scrub, Coastal Upland, Dry Prairie, or Upland Pine present on the property? YES Statement for Satisfaction of Criteria 1: Property contains Cabbage Palm Hammock, which is a Coastal Upland plant community. Criteria 2: CLIP Priority 2-4 Natural Communities If CLIP 1 Natural Communities are not present on the property, are Pine Flatwoods or Coastal Wetlands present on the property? N/A Statement for Satisfaction of Criteria 2: Property already contains a CLIP Priority 1 plant community, but also contains Mesic Pine Flatwoods. Criteria 3: Other Native, Natural Communities If CLIP 1-4 Natural Communities are not present on the property, are other native, natural communities present on the property? N/A Statement for Satisfaction of Criteria 3: Property also contains Cypress, Mixed Wetland Hardwoods, Freshwater Marsh, Mixed Scrub-Shrub Wetland, and Mixed Hardwoods - Coniferous, but already contains CLIP Priority 1-4 Natural Communities. Criteria 4: Human Social Values Does land offer cultural values, appropriate access for natural resource-based recreation, and the enhancement of the aesthetic setting of Collier County? YES Statement for Satisfaction of Criteria 4: This property is accessible from Carson Rd. and Immokalee Dr. Limerock roads and trails currently exist for access to many areas of the property. Criteria 5: Water Resources Does the property offer opportunities for protection of water resource values, including aquifer recharge, water quality enhancement, protection of wetland dependent species habitat, wildfire risk reduction, storm surge protection, and flood control? YES 28.A.21 Packet Pg. 955 Attachment: 5.E.2. Williams Farms- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: multiple Project Name: Williams Farms Date: April 3, 2024 13 Statement for Satisfaction of Criteria 5: The parcel contains hydric soils and wetland vegetation communities. It holds water during the wet season. Acquisition of the parcel would buffer wetlands adjacent to Lake Trafford. Criteria 6: Biological and Ecological Value Does the property offer significant biological values, including biodiversity and listed species habitat? YES Statement for Satisfaction of Criteria 6: A telemetry point from the endangered Florida Panther has been documented on the property. The property is utilized by listed wading birds, deer, and FL black bear. Criteria 7: Enhancement of Current Conservation Lands Does the property enhance and/or protect the environmental value of current conservation lands through function as a buffer, ecological link or habitat corridor? YES Statement for Satisfaction of Criteria 7: The property is adjacent to SSA 13 and the conservation area associated with the Arrowhead Reserve development. Criteria 8: Target Protection Mailing Area Is the property within a Board-approved target protection mailing area? NO Statement for Satisfaction of Criteria 8: The property is not within a Board approved TPMA. 28.A.21 Packet Pg. 956 Attachment: 5.E.2. Williams Farms- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: multiple Project Name: Williams Farms Date: April 3, 2024 14 3. Initial Screening Criteria 3.1 Ecological Values 3.1.1 Vegetative Communities The property consists of Improved Pasture, Cabbage Palm Hammock, Mixed Wetland Hardwoods, Cypress, Mixed Hardwood-Coniferous, Freshwater Marsh, Mesic Flatwoods, and Mixed Scrub-Shrub Wetland. Characterization of Plant Communities Present Improved pastures: This community is the most common on the portion of the property proposed for acquisition by Conservation Collier found on about 20% of the property in areas where canopy and midstory were removed historically and dominant grasses maintained through cattle grazing. This community, while not native, is crucial to protect in order to continue to provide habitat for animals requiring open areas for grazing and young rearing including turkey, deer, sandhill crane, and crested caracara. Groundcover consists of primarily Bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum), native forbs, and species like broomsedge (Andropogon sp.), smutgrass (Sporobolus indicus), caesarweed (Urena lobata), tall elephantsfoot (Elephantopus elatus), muscadine (Vitis rotundifolia), frostweed (Verbesina virginica), Beggarticks (Bidens alba). Scattered cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto), live oak (Quercus virginiana), laurel oak (Quercus laurifolia), and slash pine (Pinus elliottii) are present throughout the pastures. Cabbage Palm Hammock: This community is found along the pasture edges. Density of invasive, exotic woody species (predominantly Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolia)) is high throughout. Groundcover consists of Beggarticks, cabbage palm, dogfennel (Eupatorium capillifolium), and Southern shield fern (Thelypteris kunthii). Midstory consists of Brazilian pepper, myrsine (Myrsine cubana), wild coffee (Psychotria nervosa), American beautyberry (Callicarpa americana), greenbriar (smilax spp.), shoestring fern (Vittaria lineata), and resurrection fern (Pleopeltis michauxiana). Canopy consists of primarily cabbage palm with some scattered live oak, Laurel oak, and strangler fig (Ficus aurea). Mixed Wetland Hardwoods: This plant community is found primarily between the pasture and Cypress/Mixed Hardwood-Coniferous plant communities. Fire suppression over the years has played a role in this community having an abundance of Brazilian pepper, cabbage palm, woody growth, vines, and dense midstory fuels. Climbing fern (Lygodium sp.) is also present in varying densities throughout this community. Groundcover consists of swamp fern, sawgrass (Cladium jamaicense), and sand cordgrass (Spartina bakeri). Midstory consists cabbage palm, myrsine, wild coffee, Carolina willow (Salix caroliniana), and wax myrtle (Morella cerifera). Canopy consists of Cabbage palm, slash pine, red maple (Acer rubrum), and pop ash (Fraxinus caroliniana). Cypress: This community runs through the middle of the property. Canopy consists almost entirely of cypress (Taxodium sp.) with a sparse mid-story of Carolina willow, wax myrtle, and buttonbush (Cephalanthus occidentalis). Ground cover includes sawgrass, alligator flag (Thalia geniculata), pickerelweed (Pontederia cordata), and arrowhead (Sagittaria sp.) 28.A.21 Packet Pg. 957 Attachment: 5.E.2. Williams Farms- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: multiple Project Name: Williams Farms Date: April 3, 2024 15 Mixed Hardwood-Coniferous: This community is similar to the Cypress; however, it contains a mixture of Cypress, red maple, and pop ash in the canopy. Freshwater Marsh: This community is primarily on the western side of the property and groundcover consists of pickerelweed, sawgrass, arrowhead, sand cordgrass, maidencane (Hymenachne hemitomon), cattail (Typha domingensis), gulf coast spikerush (Eleocharis cellulosa), water lily (Nymphaea odorata). Scattered Carolina willow, buttonbush (Cephalanthus occidentalis), saltbush (Baccharis halimifolia), Peruvian primrose willow (Ludwigia peruviana), and pond apple (Annona glabra) exist within the midstory. No canopy is present. Mesic Flatwoods: A small 9-acre pocket of this community exists within the southwestern portion of the property. Ground cover includes shiny blueberry (Vaccinium myrsinites) and predominantly grasses, including wiregrass (Aristida stricta), dropseeds (Sporobolus sp), panicgrass (Dichanthelium spp.), and broomsedge (Andropogon spp.). Midstory includes saw palmetto (Serenoa repens), gallberry (Ilex glabra), coastalplain staggerbush (Lyonia fruticosa), and scattered cabbage palm. Canopy consists of slash pine. Mixed Scrub-Shrub Wetland: This community is highly disturbed, with historic ditching and possibly logging in the past. It is also heavily infested with climbing fern and Brazilian pepper. Current condition is best described as Mixed Scrub-Shrub Wetland as it is dominated by a midstory of Carolina willow and saltbush. Small red maple and cypress are also scattered throughout and groundcover is consistent with what is found in the freshwater marsh. The overall condition of the plant communities within the property is poor with an estimated exotic plant coverage of 75%. The dominant exotics noted are climbing fern and Brazilian pepper. Extensive treatment will be required to restore the natural communities on site and access will be difficult due to the deep-water levels and density of the vegetation. Table 4. Listed Plant Species Common Name Scientific Name State Status Federal Status Northern needleleaf Tillandsia balbisiana State Threatened n/a Cardinal airplant Tillandsia fasciculata State Endangered n/a Butterfly orchid Encyclia tampensis Comm. Exploited n/a 28.A.21 Packet Pg. 958 Attachment: 5.E.2. Williams Farms- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: multiple Project Name: Williams Farms Date: April 3, 2024 16 Figure 5 - CLIP4 Priority Natural Communities 28.A.21 Packet Pg. 959 Attachment: 5.E.2. Williams Farms- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: multiple Project Name: Williams Farms Date: April 3, 2024 17 Figure 6 - Florida Cooperative Land Cover Classification System 28.A.21 Packet Pg. 960 Attachment: 5.E.2. Williams Farms- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: multiple Project Name: Williams Farms Date: April 3, 2024 18 Figure 7 - Cypress Figure 8 – Mixed Wetland Hardwoods 28.A.21 Packet Pg. 961 Attachment: 5.E.2. Williams Farms- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: multiple Project Name: Williams Farms Date: April 3, 2024 19 3.1.2 Wildlife Communities This parcel provides habitat to a variety of wildlife. It is crucial to protect the upland pasture and cabbage palm hammock adjacent to the wetlands on site to continue to provide habitat for animals requiring open areas for grazing and young rearing including turkey, deer, sandhill crane, and crested caracara. It can be assumed that the same important wildlife species documented on the nearby Pepper Ranch also utilize this property including the Everglades snail kite, wood stork, black bear and multiple bird species. Additionally, a collared Florida panther (Puma concolor coryi) was tracked on the property in 2001. Table 5 – Listed Wildlife Detected Common Name Scientific Name State Status Federal Status Mode of Detection Florida Panther Puma concolor coryi Endangered Telemetry point Table 6 – Potential Listed Wildlife Species Common Name Scientific Name State Status Federal Status Little blue heron Egretta caerulea Threatened Not listed Everglade snail kite Rostrhamus sociabilis plumbeus Endangered Endangered Tricolored heron Egretta tricolor Threatened Not listed Wood stork Mycteria americana Threatened Threatened Roseate spoonbill Platalea ajaja Threatened Not listed Sandhill crane Antigone canadensis Threatened Not listed Crested caracara Caracara cheriway Threatened Threatened 28.A.21 Packet Pg. 962 Attachment: 5.E.2. Williams Farms- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: multiple Project Name: Williams Farms Date: April 3, 2024 20 Figure 9 - Wildlife Spatial Data (i.e., telemetry, roosts, etc) 28.A.21 Packet Pg. 963 Attachment: 5.E.2. Williams Farms- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: multiple Project Name: Williams Farms Date: April 3, 2024 21 Figure 10 - CLIP4 Potential Habitat Richness 28.A.21 Packet Pg. 964 Attachment: 5.E.2. Williams Farms- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: multiple Project Name: Williams Farms Date: April 3, 2024 22 3.1.3 Water Resources Acquisition of this property would offer protection of water resource values, including protection of wetland dependent species habitat and some recharge of the aquifer. Over half of the property consists of wetlands and is mapped as containing hydric soils. The property provides habitat for wetland dependent species year-round. A primary benefit to preserving the parcel in an undeveloped state would be for protection of the wetlands associated with Lake Trafford. The property also provides natural flood protection. Soils data is based on the Soil Survey of Collier County Area, Florida (USDA/NRCS, 1990). Mapped hydric soils include those that are nearly level, poorly drained and found in sloughs and poorly defined drainageways ( “BASINGER FINE SAND”, “RIVIERA FINE SAND, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM”, “HOLOPAW FINE SAND”, and “PINEDA AND RIVIERA FINE SANDS”); those that are nearly level, poorly drained and found in sloughs and cypress swamps (“RIVIERA, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM - COPELAND FINE SAND” and “WINDER, RIVIERA, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM, AND CHOBEE SOILS DEPRESSIONAL”); – those that are level, very poorly drained soils found in depressions, cypress swamps, and marshes (“CHOBEE, WINDER AND GATOR SOILS, DEPRESSIONAL” and “BOCA, RIVIERA, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM AND COPELAND FS, DEPRESSIONAL”); and those that are nearly level, poorly drained and found in hammocks and flatwoods (“HILOLO LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM, JUPITER AND MARGATE SOILS”). 28.A.21 Packet Pg. 965 Attachment: 5.E.2. Williams Farms- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: multiple Project Name: Williams Farms Date: April 3, 2024 23 Figure 11 - CLIP Aquifer Recharge Priority and Wellfield Protection Zones 28.A.21 Packet Pg. 966 Attachment: 5.E.2. Williams Farms- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: multiple Project Name: Williams Farms Date: April 3, 2024 24 Figure 12 - Collier County Soil Survey 28.A.21 Packet Pg. 967 Attachment: 5.E.2. Williams Farms- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: multiple Project Name: Williams Farms Date: April 3, 2024 25 Figure 13 LIDAR Elevation Map 28.A.21 Packet Pg. 968 Attachment: 5.E.2. Williams Farms- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: multiple Project Name: Williams Farms Date: April 3, 2024 26 3.1.4 Ecosystem Connectivity This parcel is adjacent to SSA 13 and undeveloped land to the west and to the Arrowhead Reserve developments preserve area to the north. These lands buffer Lake Trafford. The Florida Wildlife Corridor Foundation (a non-profit organization seeking landscape-scale conservation) identifies Williams Farms as an Opportunity Area - high priority land that connects and supports parks, preserves, and refuges. Figure 14 – FL Wildlife Corridor and Williams Farms 28.A.21 Packet Pg. 969 Attachment: 5.E.2. Williams Farms- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: multiple Project Name: Williams Farms Date: April 3, 2024 27 Figure 15 - Conservation Lands 28.A.21 Packet Pg. 970 Attachment: 5.E.2. Williams Farms- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: multiple Project Name: Williams Farms Date: April 3, 2024 28 3.2 Human Values 3.2.1 Recreation This parcel could potentially offer a variety of recreational opportunities such as hiking, mountain biking, horseback riding, and camping. Depending on the amount of uplands acquired by Conservation Collier, restoration activities, and adjacent lands uses, there could be potential opportunities for fishing and hunting. 3.2.2 Accessibility The parcel can be accessed via Carson Rd. and Immokalee Dr., public paved roads. Limerock roads and raised trails throughout the property make year-round access possible. 3.2.3 Aesthetic/Cultural Enhancement The provides vista views of pastures with mature oak and cypress. There is the potential for archaeological sites within the property due to its proximity to Lake Trafford. 3.3 Restoration and Management Extensive staff time, equipment, and funds will be required to restore and maintain this property through exotic plant control, fuel reduction, mowing, and potentially hydrologic restoration. Additionally, Environmental Site Assessments must be conducted to determine whether remediation is necessary prior to large scale public access amenity development. 3.3.1 Vegetation Management 3.3.1.1 Invasive Vegetation The natural communities within the property appear to be heavily infested with invasive, exotic vegetation (75% density) – primarily climbing fern and Brazilian pepper. The pastures contain non- native grass species and scattered Brazilian pepper and Caesarweed. Because of inability to access all parts of the property, reliable exotic plant treatment cost estimates cannot be determined at this time. In the event of acquisition, staff will seek partnership opportunities for exotic plant control with South Florida Water Management District’s (SFWMD) Big Cypress Basin Service Center and FWC, both of which have a vested interest in the health of Lake Trafford and the surrounding wetlands. 3.3.1.2 Prescribed Fire Cabbage palms and other fuels would need to be reduced and fire breaks installed prior to any prescribed fire within the Mesic Pine Flatwoods or drier portions of the Cabbage Palm Hammock and Mixed Wetland Hardwoods that could carry fire. Prescribed fire would also be recommended as a management tool for the pasturelands. The use of prescribed fire anywhere on the property will depend upon its compatibility with adjacent land uses. 3.3.2 Remediation and Site Security No site security issues appear to exist within the property. Entrance gates exist at all access points. Environmental Site Assessments will need to be conducted to determine whether contamination exists within the property that will require environmental remediation. 28.A.21 Packet Pg. 971 Attachment: 5.E.2. Williams Farms- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: multiple Project Name: Williams Farms Date: April 3, 2024 29 3.3.3 Assistance Staff will seek partnership opportunities for hydrological restoration and exotic plant control with SFWMD’s Big Cypress Basin Service Center and FWC, both of which have a vested interest in the health of Lake Trafford and the surrounding wetlands. 3.4 Vulnerability 3.4.1 Zoning and Land Use The entire property has a baseline zoning of A-MHO (Agricultural – Mobile Home Overlay), which allows for 1 unit per 5 acres. Approximately 332.1 acres are also within the Collier County RLSA with 176.1 acres designated as FSA, 78.6 acres designated as HSA, 63.9 acres designated as Open lands, and 13.5 acres designated as 500ft Buffer. The approximately 332.1 acres within the RLSA have a Future Land Use designation of Agricultural/Rural Mixed-Use District/RLSA FLU. The remaining 834.9 acres have an Urban Residential Subdistrict Future Land Use designation. 28.A.21 Packet Pg. 972 Attachment: 5.E.2. Williams Farms- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: multiple Project Name: Williams Farms Date: April 3, 2024 30 Figure 16 – Zoning 28.A.21 Packet Pg. 973 Attachment: 5.E.2. Williams Farms- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: multiple Project Name: Williams Farms Date: April 3, 2024 31 Figure 17 – RLSA Overlay 28.A.21 Packet Pg. 974 Attachment: 5.E.2. Williams Farms- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: multiple Project Name: Williams Farms Date: April 3, 2024 32 Figure 18 –Future Land Use 28.A.21 Packet Pg. 975 Attachment: 5.E.2. Williams Farms- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: multiple Project Name: Williams Farms Date: April 3, 2024 33 3.4.2 Development Plans The portion of the property under consideration by Conservation Collier is not currently planned for development. 4. Acquisition Considerations Staff would like to bring the following items to the attention of the Advisory Committee during the review of this property. The following items may not have significantly affected the scoring but are worth noting. Extensive staff time, equipment, and funds will be required to restore and maintain this property through exotic plant control, fuel reduction, mowing, and potential hydrologic restoration. It is recommended that at least one additional FTE Environmental Specialist II, one Equipment Operator II, a swamp buggy, a compact track loader, a 120-horsepower tractor, 2 trailers, and a truck be authorized for the Conservation Collier Program should this property be acquired. Phase 1 and Phase 2 Environmental Site Assessments are recommended due to historic uses on the property and surrounding lands. 28.A.21 Packet Pg. 976 Attachment: 5.E.2. Williams Farms- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: multiple Project Name: Williams Farms Date: April 3, 2024 34 5. Management Needs and Costs Table 7 - Estimated Costs of Site Remediation, Improvements, and Management Management Element Initial Cost Annual Recurring Cost Comments Invasive Vegetation Removal TBD TBD Cost to be determined upon closer inspection of the property Fuel reduction $168,000 N/A Estimate 140 ac. @ $1,200/ac. initial; Assumes no annual recurring once in burn rotation Firebreak installation N/A N/A Assumes firebreak creation within pastures created by staff with Program equipment FTE Environmental Specialist II $87,500 $87,500 Includes base salary and benefits FTE Equipment Operator II $73,600 $73,600 Includes base salary and benefits for employee able to operate heavy equipment Truck $100,000 Includes Ford F-550 truck with ability to haul heavy equipment Compact track loader $190,000 Can be used at other preserves with ability to trailer Swamp buggy $100,000 Can be used at other preserves with ability to trailer 120 hp Tractor $150,000 Can be used at other preserves with ability to trailer Trailers $45,000 Includes flatbed trailer for compact track loader and trailer for swamp buggy Vehicle and machinery maintenance and fuel $10,000 $10,000 Signage $10,000 $200 Interpretive and directional signage TOTAL $934,100 $171,300 28.A.21 Packet Pg. 977 Attachment: 5.E.2. Williams Farms- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: multiple Project Name: Williams Farms Date: April 3, 2024 35 6. Potential for Matching Funds The primary partnering agencies for conservation acquisitions, and those identified in the ordinance are the Florida Communities Trust (FCT) and The Florida Forever Program. The following highlights potential for partnering funds, as communicated by agency staff. Florida Communities Trust - Parks and Open Space Florida Forever grant program: The FCT Parks and Open Space Florida Forever grant program provides grant funds to local governments and nonprofit organizations to acquire conservation lands, urban open spaces, parks and greenways. Application for this program is typically made for pre-acquired sites up to two years from the time of acquisition. The Parks and Open Space Florida Forever grant program assists the Department of Environmental Protection in helping communities meet the challenges of growth, supporting viable community development and protecting natural resources and open space. The program receives 21 percent Florida Forever appropriation. This property would not be a good candidate for FCT funding. Florida Forever Program: Although this parcel is within a Florida Forever Program boundary, because of its size, the State will not pursue its acquisition. Additional Funding Sources: No additional funding sources have been identified. 28.A.21 Packet Pg. 978 Attachment: 5.E.2. Williams Farms- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: multiple Project Name: Williams Farms Date: April 3, 2024 36 7. Secondary Criteria Scoring Form Property Name: Williams Farms Target Protection Mailing Area: RLSA - FSA and HAS Folio(s): multiple Secondary Criteria Scoring Possible Points Awarded Points Percentage 1 - Ecological Value 160 133 83 2 - Human Value 80 66 82 3 - Restoration and Management 80 37 46 4 - Vulnerability 80 56 69 TOTAL SCORE 400 291 73 1 - ECOLOGICAL VALUES (40% of total) Possible Points Awarded Points Comments 1.1 VEGETATIVE COMMUNITIES 200 120 1.1.1 - Priority natural communities (Select highest score) a. Parcel contains CLIP4 Priority 1 communities (1130 - Rockland Hammock, 1210 - Scrub, 1213 - Sand Pine Scrub, 1214 - Coastal Scrub, 1312 - Scrubby Flatwoods, 1610 - Beach Dune, 1620 - Coastal Berm, 1630 - Coastal Grasslands, 1640 - Coastal Strand, or 1650 - Maritime Hammock) 100 b. Parcel contains CLIP4 Priority 2 communities (22211 - Hydric Pine Flatwoods, 2221 - Wet Flatwoods, or 1311 - Mesic Flatwoods) 60 60 Mesic Flatwoods c. Parcel contains CLIP4 Priority 3 communities (5250 - Mangrove Swamp, or 5240 - Salt Marsh) 50 d. Parcel contains CLIP4 Priority 4 communities (5250 - Mangrove Swamp) 25 1.1.2 - Plant community diversity (Select the highest score) a. Parcel has ≥ 3 CLC native plant communities (Florida Cooperative Land Cover Classification System native plant communities) 20 20 b. Parcel has ≤ 2 CLC native plant communities 10 c. Parcel has 0 CLC native plant communities 0 1.1.3 - Listed plant species (excluding commercially exploited species) (Select the highest score) a. Parcel has ≥5 CLC listed plant species 30 b. Parcel has 3-4 CLC listed plant species 20 20 3 Tillandsia species c. Parcel has ≤ 2 CLC listed plant species 10 d. Parcel has 0 CLC listed plant species 0 1.1.4 - Invasive Plant Infestation (Select highest score) a. 0 - 10% infestation 50 28.A.21 Packet Pg. 979 Attachment: 5.E.2. Williams Farms- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: multiple Project Name: Williams Farms Date: April 3, 2024 37 b. 10 - 25% infestation 40 c. 25 - 50% infestation 30 d. 50 - 75% infestation 20 20 Very heavy lygodium in disturbed marsh. Brazilian pepper along pasture edges e. ≥75% infestation 10 1.2 - WILDLIFE COMMUNITIES 100 100 1.2.1 - Listed wildlife species (Select the highest score) a. Listed wildlife species documented on the parcel 80 80 b. Listed wildlife species documented on adjacent property 60 c CLIP Potential Habitat Richness ≥5 species 40 d. No listed wildlife documented near parcel 0 1.2.2 - Significant wildlife habitat (Rookeries, roosts, denning sites, nesting grounds, high population densities, etc) (Select highest score) a. Parcel protects significant wildlife habitat (Please describe) 20 20 large size; adjacent to conservation land that is adjacent to Lake Trafford b. Parcel enhances adjacent to significant wildlife habitat (Please describe) 10 c. Parcel does not enhance significant wildlife habitat 0 1.3 - WATER RESOURCES 100 80 1.3.1 - Aquifer recharge (Select the highest score) a. Parcel is located within a wellfield protection zone or within a CLIP4 Aquifer Recharge Priority 1 area 40 40 8.5 acres in the SE corner are in a wellfield protection zone b. Parcel is located within a CLIP4 Aquifer Recharge Priority 2 or 3 area 30 c. Parcel is located within a CLIP4 Aquifer Recharge Priority 4 or 5 area 20 d. Parcel is located within a CLIP4 Aquifer Recharge Priority 6 area 0 1.3.2 - Surface Water Protection (Select the highest score) a. Parcel is contiguous with and provides buffering for an Outstanding Florida Waterbody 30 b. Parcel is contiguous with and provides buffering for a creek, river, lake, canal or other surface water body 20 20 contiguous to wetlands along Lake Trafford 28.A.21 Packet Pg. 980 Attachment: 5.E.2. Williams Farms- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: multiple Project Name: Williams Farms Date: April 3, 2024 38 c. Parcel is contiguous with and provides buffering for an identified flowway 15 d. Wetlands exist on site 10 e. Parcel does not provide opportunities for surface water quality enhancement 0 1.3.3 - Floodplain Management (Select all that apply) a. Parcel has depressional or slough soils 10 10 b. Parcel has known history of flooding and is likely to provide onsite water attenuation 10 10 c. Parcel provides storm surge buffering 10 d. Parcel does not provide floodplain management benefits 0 1.4 - ECOSYSTEM CONNECTIVITY 200 200 1.4.1 - Acreage (Select Highest Score) a. Parcel is ≥ 300 acres 150 150 b. Parcel is ≥ 100 acres 100 b. Parcel is ≥ 50 acres 75 c. Parcel is ≥ 25 acres 25 d. Parcel is ≥ 10 acres 15 e. Parcel is < 10 acres 0 1.4.2 - Connectivity (Select highest score) a. Parcel is immediately contiguous with conservation lands 50 50 b. Parcel is not immediately contiguous, but parcels between it and nearby conservation lands are undeveloped 25 c. Parcel is isolated from conservation land 0 ECOLOGICAL VALUES TOTAL POINTS 600 500 ECOLOGICAL VALUES WEIGHTED SCORE (Awarded Points/Possible Points*160) 160 133 2 - HUMAN VALUES (20%) Possible Points Awarded Points Comments 2.1 - RECREATION 120 100 2.1.1 - Compatible recreation activities (Select all that apply) a. Hunting 20 20 b. Fishing 20 20 c. Water-based recreation (paddling, swimming, etc) 20 d. Biking 20 20 e. Equestrian 20 20 f. Passive natural-resource based recreation (Hiking, photography, wildlife watching, environmental education, etc) 20 20 g. Parcel is incompatible with nature-based recreation 0 2.2 - ACCESSIBILITY 120 110 2.2.1 - Seasonality (Select the highest score) 28.A.21 Packet Pg. 981 Attachment: 5.E.2. Williams Farms- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: multiple Project Name: Williams Farms Date: April 3, 2024 39 a. Parcel accessible for land-based recreation year round 20 20 b. Parcel accessible for land-based recreation seasonally 10 c. Parcel is inaccessible for land-based recreation 0 2.2.2 - Vehicle access (Select the highest score) a. Public access via paved road 50 50 b. Public access via unpaved road 30 c. Public access via private road 20 d. No public access 0 2.2.3 - Parking Availability (Select the highest score) a. Minor improvements necessary to provide on-site parking 40 40 b. Major improvements necessary to provide on-site parking (Requires site development plan) 25 b. Public parking available nearby or on adjacent preserve 20 c. Street parking available 10 d. No public parking available 0 2.2.4 - Pedestrian access (Select the highest score) a. Parcel is easily accessible to pedestrians (within walking distance of housing development) 10 b. Parcel is not easily accessible to pedestrians 0 2.3 - AESTHETICS/CULTURAL ENHANCEMENT 40 20 2.3.1 - Aesthetic/cultural value (Choose all that apply) a. Mature/outstanding native vegetation 5 5 b. Scenic vistas 5 5 c. Frontage enhances aesthetics of public thoroughfare 10 10 d. Archaeological/historical structures present 15 e. Other (Please describe) 5 f. None 0 HUMAN VALUES TOTAL SCORE 280 230 HUMAN VALUES WEIGHTED SCORE (Awarded Points/Possible Points*80) 80 66 3 - RESTORATION AND MANAGEMENT (20%) Possible Points Awarded Points Comments 3.1 - VEGETATION MANAGEMENT 120 75 3.1.1 - Invasive plant management needs (Select the highest score) a. Minimal invasive/nuisance plant management necessary to restore and maintain native plant communities (<30%) 100 b. Moderate invasive/nuisance plant management necessary to restore and maintain native plant communities (30-65%) 75 75 c. Major invasive/nuisance plant management necessary to restore and maintain native plant communities (>65%) 50 28.A.21 Packet Pg. 982 Attachment: 5.E.2. Williams Farms- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: multiple Project Name: Williams Farms Date: April 3, 2024 40 d. Major invasive/nuisance plant management and replanting necessary to restore and maintain native plant communities (>65%) 25 e. Restoration of native plant community not feasible 0 3.1.2 - Prescribed fire necessity and compatibility (Select the highest score) a. Parcel contains fire dependent plant communities and is compatible with prescribed fire or parcel does not contain fire dependent plant communities 20 b. Parcel contains fire dependent plant communities and is incompatible with prescribed fire 0 3.2 - REMEDIATION AND SITE SECURITY 50 5 3.2.1 - Site remediation and human conflict potential (Dumping, contamination, trespassing, vandalism, other) (Select the highest score) a. Minimal site remediation or human conflict issues predicted 50 b. Moderate site remediation or human conflict issues predicted (Please describe) 20 c. Major site remediation or human conflict issues predicted (Please describe) 5 5 Potential soil/water pollution; Phase 1 and 2 recommended d. Resolving site remediation or human conflict issues not feasible 0 3.3 - ASSISTANCE 5 0 3.3.1 - Management assistance by other entity a. Management assistance by other entity likely 5 b. Management assistance by other entity unlikely 0 0 RESTORATION AND MANAGEMENT TOTAL SCORE 175 80 RESTORATION AND MANAGEMENT WEIGHTED SCORE (Awarded Points/Possible Points*80) 80 37 4 - VULNERABILITY (20%) Possible Points Awarded Points Comments 4.1 - ZONING AND LAND USE 130 105 4.1.1 - Zoning and land use designation (Select the highest score) a. Zoning allows for Single Family, Multifamily, industrial or commercial 100 b. Zoning allows for density of no greater than 1 unit per 5 acres 75 75 28.A.21 Packet Pg. 983 Attachment: 5.E.2. Williams Farms- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: multiple Project Name: Williams Farms Date: April 3, 2024 41 c. Zoning allows for agricultural use /density of no greater than 1 unit per 40 acres 50 d. Zoning favors stewardship or conservation 0 4.1.2 - Future Land Use Type (Select the highest score) a. Parcel designated Urban 30 30 b. Parcel designated Estates, Rural Fringe Receiving and Neutral, Agriculture 25 c. Parcel designated Rural Fringe Sending, Rural Lands Stewardship Area 5 d. Parcel is designated Conservation 0 4.2 - DEVELOPMENT PLANS 50 20 4.2.1 - Development plans (Select the highest score) a. Parcel has been approved for development 20 b. SFWMD and/or USACOE permit has been applied for or SDP application has been submitted 15 c. Parcel has no current development plans 0 0 4.2.2 - Site characteristics amenable to development (Select all that apply) a. Parcel is primarily upland 10 b. Parcel is along a major roadway 10 10 c. Parcel is >10 acres 5 5 d. Parcel is within 1 mile of a current or planned commercial or multi-unit residential development 5 5 VULNERABILITY TOTAL SCORE 180 125 VULNERABILITY WEIGHTED SCORE (Awarded Points/Possible Points*80) 80 56 28.A.21 Packet Pg. 984 Attachment: 5.E.2. Williams Farms- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: multiple Project Name: Williams Farms Date: April 3, 2024 42 8. Additional Site Photos Mixed Hardwood-Coniferous Mixed Wetland Hardwoods – Brazilian pepper midstory Cypress Cypress 28.A.21 Packet Pg. 985 Attachment: 5.E.2. Williams Farms- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: multiple Project Name: Williams Farms Date: April 3, 2024 43 Limerock road through property Pasture with oaks and cabbage palm Large storage building Pasture with Cabbage Palm Hammock and Mixed Wetland Hardwoods in background 28.A.21 Packet Pg. 986 Attachment: 5.E.2. Williams Farms- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: multiple Project Name: Williams Farms Date: April 3, 2024 44 Looking south from northwest side Looking southeast from northwest side Looking west from middle of north side Looking east from middle of north side 28.A.21 Packet Pg. 987 Attachment: 5.E.2. Williams Farms- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: multiple Project Name: Williams Farms Date: April 3, 2024 45 Looking north from east side Looking south from east side Overhead view showing density of cabbage palms 28.A.21 Packet Pg. 988 Attachment: 5.E.2. Williams Farms- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: multiple Project Name: Williams Farms Date: April 3, 2024 46 APPENDIX 1 – Critical Lands and Water Identification Maps (CLIP) Definitions This report makes use of data layers from the Florida Natural Areas Inventory and University of Florida Critical Lands and Waters Identification Project (CLIP4). CLIP4 is a collection of spatial data that identify statewide priorities for a broad range of natural resources in Florida. It was developed through a collaborative effort between the Florida Areas Natural Inventory (FNAI), the University of Florida GeoPlan Center and Center for Landscape Conservation Planning, and the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC). It is used in the Florida Forever Program to evaluate properties for acquisition. CLIP4 is organized into a set of core natural resource data layers which are representative of 5 resource categories: biodiversity, landscapes, surface water, groundwater and marine. The first 3 categories have also been combined into the Aggregated layer, which identifies 5 priority levels for natural resource conservation. Below is a description of each of the three CLIP4 data layers used in this report. Figure 5 - CLIP4 Priority Natural Communities Consists of 12 priority natural community types: upland glades, pine rocklands, seepage slopes, scrub, sandhill, sandhill upland lakes, rockland hammock, coastal uplands, imperiled coastal lakes, dry prairie, upland pine, pine flatwoods, upland hardwood forest, or coastal wetlands. These natural communities are prioritized by a combination of their heritage global status rank (G-rank) and landscape context, based on the Land Use Intensity Index (subset of CLIP Landscape Integrity Index) and FNAI Potential Natural Areas. Priority 1 includes G1-G3 communities with Very High or High landscape context. Priority 2 includes G1-G3 Medium and G4 Very High/High. Priority 3 includes G4 Medium and G5 Very High/High. Priority 5 is G5 Medium. This data layer was created by FNAI originally to inform the Florida Forever environmental land acquisition program. The natural communities were mapped primarily based on the FNAI/FWC Cooperative Land Cover (CLC) data layer, which is a compilation of best-available land cover data for the entire state. The CLC is based on both remote-sensed (from aerial photography, primarily from water management district FLUCCS data) and ground-truthed (from field surveys on many conservation lands) data. Figure 10 - Potential Habitat Richness CLIP4 Map This CLIP version 4.0 data layer is unchanged from CLIP v3.0. FWC Potential Habitat Richness. Because SHCAs do not address species richness, FWC also developed the potential habitat richness layer to identify areas of overlapping vertebrate species habitat. FWC created a statewide potential habitat model for each species included in their analysis. In some cases, only a portion of the potential habitat was ultimately designated as SHCA for each species. The Potential Habitat Richness layer includes the entire potential habitat model for each species and provides a count of the number of species habitat models occurring at each location. The highest number of focal species co-occurring at any location in the model is 13. 28.A.21 Packet Pg. 989 Attachment: 5.E.2. Williams Farms- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report Folio Numbers: multiple Project Name: Williams Farms Date: April 3, 2024 47 Figure 11 - CLIP4 Aquifer Recharge Priority and Wellfield Protection Zones High priorities indicate high potential for recharge to an underlying aquifer system (typically the Floridan aquifer but could be intermediate or surficial aquifers in some portions of the state). The highest priorities indicate high potential for recharge to springs or public water supplies. This figure also includes Wellfield Protection Zones. Collier County Wellfield Protection Zones are referenced in the Land Development Code and updated in 2010 by Pollution Control and Prevention Department Staff. The public water supply wellfields, identified in section 3.06.06 and permitted by the SFWMD for potable water to withdraw a minimum of 100,000 average gallons per day (GPD), are identified as protected wellfields, around which specific land use and activity (regulated development) shall be regulated under this section. 28.A.21 Packet Pg. 990 Attachment: 5.E.2. Williams Farms- ICSR (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Agenda Item 5.D. Initial Screening Property for Review April 3, 2023 Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Advisory Committee Presented By: Melissa Hennig, Environmental Specialist I 28.A.22 Packet Pg. 991 Attachment: 5.D. ISC (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Diveley Trust • Acreage: 10.0 acres • Location: Approx. 1½ mile east of North Belle Meade Preserve and ½ mile east of Kam Luck Dr, north of I-75; RFMUD-NRPA-NBMO- Sending 28.A.22 Packet Pg. 992 Attachment: 5.D. ISC (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Diveley Trust Met 4 out of 8 Initial Criteria Criteria #1 –CLIP Priority 1 Natural Community? NO Criteria #2 -CLIP Priority 2-4 Natural Community? YES Mapped as Hydric Pine Flatwoods Criteria #3 – Other Native, Natural Communities? N/A Also mapped as Mixed Scrub-Shrub Wetland; but already contains a CLIP 2-4 Natural Community Criteria #4 –Human Social Value? NO Inaccessible to the public; not near parcels owned by Collier County Criteria #5 –Protection of Water Resource Value? YES Mapped as 100% hydric soils; most likely holds water during wet season Criteria #6 –Significant Biological values? YES FL panther habitat and potential Big Cypress fox squirrel, red-cockaded woodpecker, and gopher tortoise habitat Criteria #7 –Connectivity? YES Private CE’s to east and west of parcel Criteria #8 – Within Board approved TPMA? NO 28.A.22 Packet Pg. 993 Attachment: 5.D. ISC (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Initial Criteria Screening Report (ICSR) Properies for Review April 3, 2024 Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Advisory Committee Presented By: Melissa Hennig, Environmental Specialist I 28.A.23 Packet Pg. 994 Attachment: 5.E. ICSRs (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Santamaria • Acreage: 61.1 acres • Location: About ¾ of a mile north of Caracara Prairie Preserve; East off Corkscrew Rd. and south of Whidden Loop Rd.; adjacent to CREW District Lands Santamaria 28.A.23 Packet Pg. 995 Attachment: 5.E. ICSRs (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) 117 57 80 56 160 80 80 80 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 1 - Ecological Value 2 - Human Value 3 - Restoration and Management 4 - Vulnerability Total Score: 310/400 Awarded Points Possible Points Santamaria 28.A.23 Packet Pg. 996 Attachment: 5.E. ICSRs (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Criteria Awarded Weighted Points Possible Weighted Points Awarded/Possible Points 1 - Ecological Value 117 160 73% 1.1 - Vegetative Communities 40 53 75% 1.2 - Wildlife Communities 27 27 100% 1.3 - Water Resources 17 27 65% 1.4 - Ecosystem Connectivity 33 53 63% Santamaria - Ecological Value Score (117 out of 160) Vegetative Communities – Unimproved Pasture, Hydric Pine Flatwoods, Mesic Hammock, Mixed Wetland Hardwoods, Freshwater Marsh; T. balbisiana, T. fasciculata, butterfly orchid, Catesby’s lily Wildlife Communities – Deer, turkey, sandhill crane, crested caracara in pastures; American alligator and FL panther; listed wading birds Water Resources – Over half the property holds water during rainy season; part of outer edge of CREW wetlands Ecosystem Connectivity – Adjacent to CREW District Lands on eastern and southern borders 28.A.23 Packet Pg. 997 Attachment: 5.E. ICSRs (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Santamaria Human Values Score (57 out of 80) Recreation – Opportunities for bird watching, hiking, bike riding, hunting, fishing, and camping; potential for environmental education through CREW Land & Water Trust; adjacent to CREW Yellow Trail Accessibility – Accessible year-round off public road Aesthetics/Cultural Enhancement – Visible from paved roads; Open landscape vistas and large mature oak trees; historic structures Criteria Awarded Weighted Points Possible Weighted Points Awarded/Possible Points 2 - Human Values 54 80 68%2 - Human Values 57 80 71% 2.1 - Recreation 23 34 67% 2.2 - Accessibility 26 34 75% 2.3 - Aesthetics/Cultural Enhancement 9 11 75% 28.A.23 Packet Pg. 998 Attachment: 5.E. ICSRs (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Santamaria Restoration and Management Score (80 out of 80) Vegetation Management – The entire property appears to contain less than 10% exotic plant cover; current owner has been controlling exotics for years; main plant is Caesarweed Remediation and Site Security – No major issues anticipated; access via locked gate Assistance – Potential for SFWMD staff to assist with prescribed fire and for FWC to assist with hunting via integration into CREW WEA Criteria Awarded Weighted Points Possible Weighted Points Awarded/Possible Points 3 - Restoration and Management 48 80 60%3 - Restoration and Management 80 80 100% 3.1 - Vegetation Management 55 55 100% 3.2 - Remediation and Site Security 23 23 100% 3.3 - Assistance 2 2 100% 28.A.23 Packet Pg. 999 Attachment: 5.E. ICSRs (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Santamaria Vulnerability Score (56 out of 80) Zoning and Land Use – A-MHO (1 unit / 5 acres); FLU Designation is Conservation Development Plans – None; Kingston development proposed west of Corkscrew Rd. Criteria Awarded Weighted Points Possible Weighted Points Awarded/Possible Points 4 - Vulnerability 40 80 50%4 - Vulnerability 56 80 69% 4.1 - Zoning and Land Use 44 58 77% 4.2 - Development Plans 11 22 50% 28.A.23 Packet Pg. 1000 Attachment: 5.E. ICSRs (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Santamaria Acquisition Considerations Potential for partnership with CREW Land & Water Trust with some of the buildings to support environmental education; staff recommends a Phase 1 ESA 28.A.23 Packet Pg. 1001 Attachment: 5.E. ICSRs (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Williams Farms • Acreage: Approximately 1,167 acres • Location: About 1/4 of a mile east of Lake Trafford; South of Lake Trafford Rd. off Carson Rd.; Approx. 332 ac. within RLSA Williams Farms 28.A.23 Packet Pg. 1002 Attachment: 5.E. ICSRs (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) 133 66 37 56 160 80 80 80 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 1 - Ecological Value 2 - Human Value 3 - Restoration and Management 4 - Vulnerability Total Score: 291/400 Awarded Points Possible Points Williams Farms 28.A.23 Packet Pg. 1003 Attachment: 5.E. ICSRs (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Williams Farms - Ecological Value Score (144 out of 160) Vegetative Communities – Improved Pasture, Cabbage Palm Hammock, Mixed Wetland Hardwoods, Cypress, Mixed Hardwood-Coniferous, Freshwater Marsh, Mesic Flatwoods, and Mixed Scrub-Shrub Wetland; T. balbisiana, T. fasciculata, butterfly orchid Wildlife Communities – Deer, turkey, sandhill crane, crested caracara in pastures; American alligator and FL panther; listed wading birds; Everglade snail kite Water Resources – Over half the property holds water during rainy season and is mapped as hydric soils; wetlands buffer Lake Trafford wetlands Ecosystem Connectivity – Adjacent to SSA 13 on west side and adjacent to Arrowhead Reserve preserve area on north side 28.A.23 Packet Pg. 1004 Attachment: 5.E. ICSRs (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Williams Farms Human Values Score (66 out of 80) Recreation – Opportunities for bird watching, bike riding, and camping; potential for hunting depending on adjacent uses Accessibility – Accessible year-round off public road Aesthetics/Cultural Enhancement –Open landscape vistas and large, mature cypress and oak trees Criteria Awarded Weighted Points Possible Weighted Points Awarded/Possible Points 2 - Human Values 54 80 68% 28.A.23 Packet Pg. 1005 Attachment: 5.E. ICSRs (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Williams Farms Restoration and Management Score (37 out of 80) Vegetation Management – The entire property appears to contain 75% exotic plant cover; extensive lygodium and Brazilian pepper cover in areas that are difficult to access; cabbage palm reduction necessary prior to prescribed fire Remediation and Site Security – Access via locked gate; environmental remediation may be necessary depending on ESA’s Assistance – Potential for SFWMD assistance with hydrologic restoration; potential for SFWMD and FWC assistance with exotic plant control Criteria Awarded Weighted Points Possible Weighted Points Awarded/Possible Points 3 - Restoration and Management 48 80 60% 28.A.23 Packet Pg. 1006 Attachment: 5.E. ICSRs (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Williams Farms Vulnerability Score (56 out of 80) Zoning and Land Use – Zoned A-MHO (1 unit / 5 ac.); 332.1 ac. zoned RLSA (176.1 ac FSA, 78.6 ac. HSA, 63.9 ac. Open lands, and 13.5 ac. 500ft Buffer); FLU is Urban Residential Subdistrict (834.9 ac.) and Agricultural/Rural Mixed Use District/RLSA (332.1 ac.) Development Plans – None on portion considered by Conservation Collier Criteria Awarded Weighted Points Possible Weighted Points Awarded/Possible Points 4 - Vulnerability 40 80 50% 28.A.23 Packet Pg. 1007 Attachment: 5.E. ICSRs (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Williams Farms Acquisition Considerations Staff recommends a Phase 1 ESA (and most likely Phase 2 ESA) due to historic and surrounding land use 28.A.23 Packet Pg. 1008 Attachment: 5.E. ICSRs (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - April 3, 2024) Collier County Tr ansportation Management Services Department Ve terans Memorial Blvd. Extension Exceptional Benefits Petition Railhead Scrub Preserve Parcel Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Advisory Council April 3, 2024 APRIL 3, 2024 1 28.A.24 Packet Pg. 1009 Attachment: TMD Presentation to CCLAAC DRAFT 4-3-24 (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - Ve tera ns Memorial Blvd Extension Exceptional Benefits Request Presentation Team •Tr inity Scott, Collier County TMSD Department Head •Jay Ahmad, P.E. Collier County Tra nsportation Engineering Director •Lorraine Lantz, Collier County Tra nsportation Planning Manager •Christopher Wright, P.E., RWA Engineering •Tim Hall, Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. •Marielle Nageon De Lestang, Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. APRIL 3, 2024 2 28.A.24 Packet Pg. 1010 Attachment: TMD Presentation to CCLAAC DRAFT 4-3-24 (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - Ve tera ns Memorial Blvd. Extension Project Site Map APRIL 3, 2024 3 Phase 1 of VMB Ext. is complete. Phase 2 requires identifying a pond site location. The preferred pond site identified is owned by Conservation Collier. In order to proceed, an Exceptional Benefits Request is being presented. 28.A.24 Packet Pg. 1011 Attachment: TMD Presentation to CCLAAC DRAFT 4-3-24 (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - Project Site Map and Pond Locations APRIL 3, 2024 4 28.A.24 Packet Pg. 1012 Attachment: TMD Presentation to CCLAAC DRAFT 4-3-24 (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - Exceptional Benefits Criteria Overview Public Purpose Ve terans Memorial Blvd. Extension (VMB Ext.) project was identified as a public need at the time the preferred parcel was acquired for future use. Minimize Impacts The Pond Siting Report concluded that preferred Pond Site 1 was the best choice based on the proximity to the drainage basin and other considerations. Offsetting Impacts Use of the program lands as re-configured in the pond concept design and provides the least overall impacts. Consideration of Alternatives Pond siting study, environmental surveys, and careful consideration of all alternatives, were analyzed to determine which program lands were the least impacted. Meeting Exceptional Benefit Public access, a goal of Conservation Collier, will be improved. Currently, there is no public access to the Program Lands. Reports of unauthorized access have been noted. Requires evaluation and considerat ion of several key factors. This request demonstrates how each criteria is met by using Conservation Land. Reviews 7 Criteria. APRIL 3, 2024 5 28.A.24 Packet Pg. 1013 Attachment: TMD Presentation to CCLAAC DRAFT 4-3-24 (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - Criteria A State the public purpose for which the other-use dedication is being requested. APRIL 3, 2024 6 •The Veterans Memorial Blvd Extension (VMB Ext.) Project has been identified in Collier MPO’s Long Range Tra nsportation Plan (LRTP). The project is identified in the County ’s Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) as a solution to existing deficiencies on the transportation network. •Pond site infrastructure is a required part of the VMB Ext. Project. •A Pond Site Study completed by RWA, Inc. examined various alternatives and recommends the use of the Railhead Scrub Preserve parcel for the drainage pond. •The identified parcel will be used as a drainage pond to accommodate the VMB Ext. Project and bring public access to the area. 28.A.24 Packet Pg. 1014 Attachment: TMD Presentation to CCLAAC DRAFT 4-3-24 (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - Criteria B Provide a history and discussion of alternatives to requesting the specific interest in Program Lands and demonstrate why other alternatives are not acceptable. APRIL 3, 2024 7 •VMB Ext. Phase 1 has been completed. The pond site required for Phase 1 is at capacity and cannot accommodate further expansion. •A Pond Siting Report was completed for the project to evaluate drainage needs, pond sites and develop alternatives. •In total, 5 (five) pond sites were evaluated. •Pond Site 1 was found to be the preferred alternative when all factors were considered. 28.A.24 Packet Pg. 1015 Attachment: TMD Presentation to CCLAAC DRAFT 4-3-24 (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - Evaluated Pond Locations APRIL 3, 2024 8 28.A.24 Packet Pg. 1016 Attachment: TMD Presentation to CCLAAC DRAFT 4-3-24 (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - Po nd Site 1 Location Located on the south side of VMB Ext. west of the railroad -area known as Railhead Scrub Preserve Characteristics Acquired as a separate 60 acres of preserve area. Will be shaped to minimize impacts. Preferred Location Lowest impact to species, location in correct basin, and avoids habitat. APRIL 3, 2024 9 28.A.24 Packet Pg. 1017 Attachment: TMD Presentation to CCLAAC DRAFT 4-3-24 (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - Po nd Site 2 Location Located on the south side of VMB Ext. Adjacent to the new high school. Characteristics Part of an existing PUD. Not located within the existing natural drainage basin. Suitability Ranked last for suitability. APRIL 3, 2024 10 28.A.24 Packet Pg. 1018 Attachment: TMD Presentation to CCLAAC DRAFT 4-3-24 (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - Po nd Site 3 Location Located south of VMB Ext. and west of Old US41. Characteristics Currently under wetland conservation easement resulting in additional mitigation. Suitability Results in loss of historical mitigation. Requires parcel be vacated and mitigated at another location. Ranked 4th. APRIL 3, 2024 11 28.A.24 Packet Pg. 1019 Attachment: TMD Presentation to CCLAAC DRAFT 4-3-24 (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - Po nd Site 4 Location Located north of VMB Ext. and west of Old US41. Characteristics Owned by Meadowbrook Preserve and under a conservation easement held by SFWMD. Suitability Impacts high quality wetlands under SFWMD Conservation Easement. APRIL 3, 2024 12 28.A.24 Packet Pg. 1020 Attachment: TMD Presentation to CCLAAC DRAFT 4-3-24 (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - Po nd Site 5 Location Located south of VMB Ext. and directly adjacent to US41. Characteristics Parcel purchased for VMB Ext. project. Parcel to be used for the road and as part of stormwater system. Suitability Site too small to provide adequate stormwater management for the project. Site is already part of the drainage calculations. APRIL 3, 2024 13 28.A.24 Packet Pg. 1021 Attachment: TMD Presentation to CCLAAC DRAFT 4-3-24 (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - Evaluated Pond Locations APRIL 3, 2024 14 28.A.24 Packet Pg. 1022 Attachment: TMD Presentation to CCLAAC DRAFT 4-3-24 (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - Preferred Alternative Pond Locations APRIL 3, 2024 15 28.A.24 Packet Pg. 1023 Attachment: TMD Presentation to CCLAAC DRAFT 4-3-24 (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - Criteria C Demonstrate the requested other-use of the Program Lands takes the minimum acreage and, to the maximum extent possible, minimizes harmful intrusion, preserves higher quality lands, etc. APRIL 3, 2024 16 •Pond Siting Report includes evaluation of various alternatives and considers environmental impacts •To the greatest extent possible, the VMB Ext. project will limit the acreage needed. •The advance acquisition of Pond Site 5 and the pond site for Phase I have been included in the calculation to allow for the least amount of Conservation Collier Land. •The pond site concept was refined after coordination with Conservation Collier Staff and the preliminary design takes into consideration the minimum acreage needed and demonstrates the intent to minimize impacts to the area. 28.A.24 Packet Pg. 1024 Attachment: TMD Presentation to CCLAAC DRAFT 4-3-24 (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - Refined Alternative Pond Location APRIL 3, 2024 17 28.A.24 Packet Pg. 1025 Attachment: TMD Presentation to CCLAAC DRAFT 4-3-24 (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - Criteria D Demonstrate how the use of the Pro gram Lands will be offs et with an Exceptional Benefit to the Pro gram. APRIL 3, 2024 18 •Improved public access to Conservation Lands, a goal of the Conservation Collier •Improves access, connectivity, safety and circulation for the transportation network including the newly opened Aubrey Rogers High School and surrounding community. •Provides opportunity address unauthorized access to the area. •Provides additional funding to make improvements on site. 28.A.24 Packet Pg. 1026 Attachment: TMD Presentation to CCLAAC DRAFT 4-3-24 (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - Criteria E Demonstrate how the Other-Use dedications of portion of Program Lands will not adversely affe ct any state or federally listed species. APRIL 3, 2024 19 •All work within this area will be permitted as required and in compliance with all appropriate agencies •State and Federal agencies provide guidance on State or Federally listed species. •All laws, ordinances, regulations and required compliance activities will be adhered to during all phases of the Project. 28.A.24 Packet Pg. 1027 Attachment: TMD Presentation to CCLAAC DRAFT 4-3-24 (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - To rtoise Locations APRIL 3, 2024 20 28.A.24 Packet Pg. 1028 Attachment: TMD Presentation to CCLAAC DRAFT 4-3-24 (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - Criteria F Demonstrate that the proposed compensation meets the goals and purposes of the Pro gram and provides an Exceptional Benefit to the Conservation Collier Program. APRIL 3, 2024 21 In addition to the financial compensation established by the appraisal,TMSD recommends contributing the following exceptional benefits to the program: ·Providing a small pipe (minimum 18 inches in diameter)set at- grade. ·A financial contribution of $35,000 to Conservation Collier for use at the preserve. ·Coordination meetings at ke y project milestones. ·Note -all compensation requires BCC approval and acceptance 28.A.24 Packet Pg. 1029 Attachment: TMD Presentation to CCLAAC DRAFT 4-3-24 (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - Criteria G Include the current value of the land to be acquired as provided fo r in Section 4.02 of the Ordinance. APRIL 3, 2024 22 •An appraisal of the property will be done to determine the current value of the Program Land to be used for the pond site. •The appraisal will be ordered and completed at the BCC ’s direction. •Note -all compensation requires BCC approval and acceptance 28.A.24 Packet Pg. 1030 Attachment: TMD Presentation to CCLAAC DRAFT 4-3-24 (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - Exceptional Benefits Criteria Overview Public Purpose Ve terans Memorial Blvd. Extension (VMB Ext.) project was identified as a public need at the time the preferred parcel was acquired for future use. Minimize Impacts The Pond Siting Report concluded that preferred Pond Site 1 was the best choice based on the proximity to the drainage basin and other considerations. Offsetting Impacts Use of the program lands as re-configured in the pond concept design and provides the least overall impacts. Consideration of Alternatives Pond siting study, environmental surveys, and careful consideration of all alternatives, were analyzed to determine which program lands were the least impacted. Meeting Exceptional Benefit Public access, a goal of Conservation Collier, will be improved. Currently, there is no public access to the Program Lands. Reports of unauthorized access have been noted. Requires evaluation and considerat ion of several key factors. This request demonstrates how each criteria is met by using Conservation Land. Reviews 7 Criteria. APRIL 3, 2024 23 28.A.24 Packet Pg. 1031 Attachment: TMD Presentation to CCLAAC DRAFT 4-3-24 (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - Questions? Thank you Lorraine Lantz Tr ansportati on Planning Manager 239-252-5779 Lorraine.Lantz@CollierCountyFL.gov APRIL 3, 2024 24 28.A.24 Packet Pg. 1032 Attachment: TMD Presentation to CCLAAC DRAFT 4-3-24 (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - Ve tera ns Memorial Blvd. Extension Program Impacts APRIL 3, 2024 25 Modeling traffic based on historical trends indicate levels of service decline Congestion, safety incidents including fatalities and serious injuries correspondingly increase Needed drainage improvements and impacts to water quality remain unaddressed Missed transportation network connections create increased congestion, resulting in delays, loss of productivity, costs and impact air quality Delays planned improvements prioritized in long-range planning documents and AUIR 28.A.24 Packet Pg. 1033 Attachment: TMD Presentation to CCLAAC DRAFT 4-3-24 (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - Criteria E APRIL 3, 2024 26 Listed Animal Species -The Railhead Scrub Preserve Land Management Plan updated August 2021 documents the occurrence of the gopher tortoise which are listed as Threatened in Florida. Both the tortoise and its burrow are protected under state law.Gopher tortoises within 25 feet of construction activities must be relocated before any land clearing and development takes place. Permits regarding relocations must be acquired from the Florida Wi ldlife Commission (FWC). In addition,the FNAI database report indicated two other listed species that have the potential to occur at the preserve based on the known or predicted range of the species.They are the eastern indigo snake and the gopher frog. Listed Plant Species -There are no species listed as Endangered or Threatened by the U.S.Fish and Wi ldlife Service.There are 12 plant species at Railhead Scrub Preserve that are listed by the State of Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (FDACS),five (5)as Endangered,six (6)as Threatened,and one (1)as Commercially Exploited.The Florida Natural Areas Inventory (FNAI)lists seven (7)species as Imperiled to Critically Imperiled in Florida. The Institute for Regional Conservation (IRC)lists four (4)species as Critically Imperiled in South Florida. 28.A.24 Packet Pg. 1034 Attachment: TMD Presentation to CCLAAC DRAFT 4-3-24 (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - Next Steps APRIL 3, 2024 27 BCC APPROVAL MARKET APPRAISAL COMPENSATION PERMITTING Petition is presented to the BCC for their recommendation Market appraisal is completed and presented to the BCC for approval Agreements and Financial compensation is approved by the BCC Ve te rans Memorial Blvd. Ext. Phase II moves into the permitting phase 28.A.24 Packet Pg. 1035 Attachment: TMD Presentation to CCLAAC DRAFT 4-3-24 (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - Ve tera ns Memorial Blvd. Extension Planned Improvements IDENTIFIED NEEDS Project is an identified need and documented in the Collier MPO’s Long-Range Transportation Plans since 2001. Project is identified in the AUIR as a need to address growth, connectivity, and livability. Project provides needed connection to US41 developing alternative routes, alleviating congestion, and improving safety. Project meets the demands of the traveling public in the area including Aubrey Rogers High School. BENEFITS Adds safety improvements including sidewalks and shared use paths for pedestrian safety and improved access. Po tential for improving safety response time fo r fire and rescue services by reducing trip length. Improves circulation in the area, providing alternative routes and reducing congestion. Brings improvements to conservation area by creating legal access and addresses unauthorized and impactful access. Provides funding for onsite to the Railhead Preserve. APRIL 3, 2024 28 28.A.24 Packet Pg. 1036 Attachment: TMD Presentation to CCLAAC DRAFT 4-3-24 (28528 : Land Acquisition Advisory Committee -