Loading...
Agenda 03/26/2024 Item # 9A (Ordinance - Create the GMA Commercial Subdistrict within the rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element of the Golden Gate area)03/26/2024 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending the Collier County Growth Management Plan to create the GMA Commercial Subdistrict within the Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan to allow 125,000 square feet of gross floor area of Commercial Intermediate (C-3) and Indoor Air-Conditioned Mini and Self-Storage (SIC 4225) uses, of which up to 80,000 square feet of gross floor area may consist of Indoor Air-Conditioned Mini and Self-Storage. The subject property, consisting of 9.84± acres, is located on the south side of Immokalee Road, approximately 773 feet west of the intersection of Immokalee Road and Randall Boulevard in Section 27, Township 48 South, Range 27 East. [PL20230002460] (Companion item to 9B) _____________________________________________________________________________________ OBJECTIVE: To have the Board of County Commissioners (Board) approve (adopt) the proposed small-scale amendment to the Growth Management Plan (GMP) and approve said amendment for transmittal to the Florida Department of Commerce. CONSIDERATIONS: The petition seeks to amend the Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element and Future Land Use Map of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan, specifically to create the GMA Commercial Subdistrict, to allow for a maximum of 125,000 square feet of gross floor area of Commercial Intermediate (C-3) and up to 80,000 square feet of Indoor Air-Conditioned Mini and Self-Storage (SIC 4225) uses. The companion petition (PL20230002458) proposes to rezone the site from Estates (E) to a Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD). The subject ±9.84-acre site is located on the south side of Immokalee Road, approximately 772 feet west of the intersection of Immokalee Road and Randall Boulevard in Section 27, Township 48 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. The site comprises three parcels, all of which are designated as Estates (Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict). Two of the three parcels are owned by GM Advisors, LLC, and one parcel is currently owned by Collier County Transportation Right-of-Way. Per Chapter 163.3187, Part II, Florida Statutes, limitations are in place for this type of small-scale amendment, as identified below, followed by staff comments [italicized in brackets]. Process for adoption of small-scale comprehensive plan amendment. (1) A small-scale development amendment may be adopted under the following conditions: (a) The proposed amendment involves a use of 50 acres or fewer. [The amendment pertains to a property consisting of ±9.84 acres.] (b) The proposed amendment does not involve a text change to the goals, policies, and objectives of the local government’s comprehensive plan but only proposes a land use change to the future land use map for a site- specific small-scale development activity. However, text changes that relate directly to, and are adopted simultaneously with the small-scale future land use map amendment, shall be permissible under this section. [This amendment involves a site-specific text and map location.] (c) The property that is the subject of the proposed amendment is not located within an area of critical state concern unless the project subject to the proposed amendment involves the construction of affordable housing units meeting the criteria of s. 420.0004 (3) and is located within an area of critical state concern designated by s. 380.0552 or by the Administration Commission pursuant to s. 380.05 (1). [The subject property is not within an Area of Critical State Concern.] (4) Comprehensive plans may only be amended in such a way as to preserve the internal consistency of the plan according to s. 163.3177. [The amendment preserves the internal consistency between and among GMP elements.] FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: Staff makes the following findings and conclusions based on a review of this petition, including the supporting data and analysis. More analysis is provided in the Staff Report to the Collier 9.A Packet Pg. 23 03/26/2024 County Planning Commission (CCPC). • The GMA Commercial Subdistrict petition proposes a small-scale Growth Management Plan amendment to create a ±9.84 Subdistrict to allow 125,000 square feet of commercial floor area, of which up to 80,000 square feet could be indoor self-storage. • There are no adverse environmental impacts as a result of this petition. • No historical or archaeological sites are affected by this amendment. • There are no public utility-related concerns as a result of this petition. • There are no concerns about impacts on other public infrastructure. • Staff has identified issues regarding the need for additional commercial square footage in this area of the county, given that the GMP currently allows over four million square feet of commercial square footage. The needs analysis provided for the petition utilizes bot h a supply/demand analysis as well as an allocation ratio to support the 125,000 square feet of commercial space proposed for the project. It appears that the supply/demand analysis has identified that the existing commercial square footage is sufficient past 2033 but not sufficient in 2038. Staff has determined that consideration of public benefit derived from the Swap Parcel and the construction of the stormwater improvements by the developer may be sufficient justification for the GMPA. • The location of the proposed commercial project in the Rural Golden Gate Estates area west of Randall Boulevard is not well supported by the GGAMP, nor is it supported by the Immokalee Road/Randall Boulevard Planning Study. • The proposed buffers do not meet the 75-foot minimum width required by the GGAMP for a comparable provision for commercial uses (Neighborhood Center Subdistrict), which staff believes is appropriate to apply. The reduction in the buffer widths, as requested, may be justified in some locations to offset costs of the developer constructing the County stormwater facility on the Swap Parcel; however, staff recommends a provision for an opaque fence or wall, per LDC 4.06.02.c.2, within the 50-foot southern buffer to protect the existing residences adjacent to the project area. If a wall is not provided, then the buffer should be required to meet the minimum 75-foot width. FISCAL IMPACT: Petition fees account for staff review time and materials and the cost of associated legal advertising/public notice for the public hearings. Therefore, no fiscal impacts to Collier County result from adopting this amendment. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Adopting the proposed amendment by the Board and its transmittal to the Florida Department of Commerce will commence the Department’s (30) thirty-day challenge period for any affected person. Provided the small-scale amendment is not challenged, it becomes effective (31) thirty-one days after Board adoption. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This Growth Management Plan (GMP) amendment is authorized by and subject to the procedures established in Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes, The Community Planning Act, and Collier County Resolution No. 12-234, as amended. The Board should consider the following criteria in making its decision: “Plan amendments shall be based on relevant and appropriate data and an analysis by the local government that may include but not be limited to, surveys, studies, community goals and vision, and other data available at the time of adoption of the plan amendment. To be based on data means to react to it in an appropriate way and to the extent necessary indicated by the data available on that particular subject at the time of adoption of the plan or plan amendment at issue.” 163.3177(1)(f), F.S. In addition, s. 163.3177(6)(a)2, F.S. provides that FLUE plan amendments shall be based on surveys, studies, and data regarding the area, as applicable, including: a. The amount of land required to accommodate anticipated growth. b. The projected permanent and seasonal population of the area. c. The character of undeveloped land. d. The availability of water supplies, public facilities, and services. 9.A Packet Pg. 24 03/26/2024 e. The need for redevelopment, including the renewal of blighted areas and the elimination of non-conforming uses inconsistent with the community's character. f. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to or closely proximate to military installations. g. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to an airport as defined in s. 330.35 and consistent with s. 333.02. h. The need to modify land uses and development patterns with antiquated subdivisions. i. The discouragement of urban sprawl. j. The need for job creation, capital investment, and economic development that will strengthen and diversify the community’s economy. And FLUE map amendments shall also be based upon the following analysis per Section 163.3177(6)(a)8.: a. An analysis of the availability of facilities and services. b. An analysis of the suitability of the plan amendment for its proposed use considering the character of the undeveloped land, soils, topography, natural resources, and historic resources on site. c. An analysis of the minimum amount of land needed to achieve the goals and requirements of this section. This item is approved as to form and legality. It requires an affirmative vote of four for approval because this is an Adoption hearing of the GMP amendment. (HFAC) STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO CCPC: To forward petition PL20230002460 GMA Commercial Subdistrict GMPA to the Board with a recommendation to approve, adopt, and transmit to the Florida Department of Commerce and other statutorily required agencies, with a recommendation for an opaque fence or wall along the southern perimeter of the PUD. CCPC RECOMMENDATION: The CCPC heard this petition at their February 1, 2024, CCPC meeting. Commissioner Schmitt noted that three residential homes next to a future grade separated overpass is not desirable and made a motion to forward the subject petition to the Board with a recommendation to approve for transmittal to the Florida Department of Commerce and other statutorily required agencies with the following condition: 1. The applicant shall install a wall on the southern perimeter of Parcels 35 and 36 so that the wall and be rm are a minimum of eight feet tall. The southern perimeter buffer shall not be required to provide enhanced buffer plantings. Commissioners Schmitt and Klucik voted to approve the motion. Commissioners Fryer, Shea, and Sparrazza voted against the motion, finding that, though there was a public benefit derived from the project, there was no demonstrated need for commercial development in the area with over four million square feet of commercial square footage currently allowed by the GMP in Northern Collier County. There was also discussion of whether the site would qualify for Live Local after it is rezoned. Two speakers appeared at the hearing in opposition to the project. They were concerned that the zoning change is not consistent with the established rural character and Growth Management Plan policies associated with the Estates, noting that noise will impact surrounding homes, traffic is already congested, and placement of the proposed commercial uses where the shooting of firearms is allowed would be incompatible. 9.A Packet Pg. 25 03/26/2024 RECOMMENDATION: To adopt and transmit petition PL20230002460 to the Florida Department of Commerce and other statutorily required agencies subject to a condition for an opaque fence or wall and berm along the southern perimeter of Parcels 35 and 36 of the Subdistrict. Prepared by: Kathy Eastley, Planner III, Zoning Division ATTACHMENT(S) 1. CCPC Staff Report GMA (PDF) 2. Exhibit A - Ordinance 020524 (PDF) 3. [Linked] Exhibit B - CCPC Back-up Documents (PL-20230002460) (PDF) 4. [Linked] Exhibit C - NIM Documents (PDF) 5. Exhibit D - Affidavit of Sign Posting (PDF) 6. legal ad - agenda IDs 27897 & 27927 (PDF) 9.A Packet Pg. 26 03/26/2024 COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners Item Number: 9.A Doc ID: 27897 Item Summary: Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending the Collier County Growth Management Plan to create the GMA Commercial Subdistrict within the Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan to allow 125,000 square feet of gross floor area of Commercial Intermediate (C -3) and Indoor Air-Conditioned Mini and Self-Storage (SIC 4225) uses, of which up to 80,000 square feet of gross floor area may consist of Indoor Air-Conditioned Mini and Self-Storage. The subject property, consisting of 9.84± acres, is located on the south side of Immokalee Road, approximately 773 feet west of the intersection of Immokalee Road and Randall Boulevard in Section 27, Township 48 South, Range 27 East. [PL20230002460] (Companion item to 9B) Meeting Date: 03/26/2024 Prepared by: Title: – Zoning Name: Katherine Eastley 02/20/2024 12:44 PM Submitted by: Title: Zoning Director – Zoning Name: Mike Bosi 02/20/2024 12:44 PM Approved By: Review: Zoning Mike Bosi Division Director Completed 02/21/2024 10:29 AM Zoning James Sabo Additional Reviewer Completed 02/26/2024 2:56 PM Building Plan Review & Inspections Diane Lynch GMCDD Reviewer Skipped 02/26/2024 3:59 PM Growth Management Community Development Department Diane Lynch GMD Approver Completed 03/01/2024 5:30 PM Unknown Jaime Cook GMCDD Reviewer Completed 03/07/2024 8:58 AM County Attorney's Office Heidi Ashton-Cicko Level 2 Attorney of Record Review Completed 03/11/2024 12:06 PM Growth Management Community Development Department James C French Growth Management Completed 03/12/2024 2:29 PM Office of Management and Budget Debra Windsor Level 3 OMB Gatekeeper Review Completed 03/13/2024 8:22 AM County Attorney's Office Jeffrey A. Klatzkow Level 3 County Attorney's Office Review Completed 03/13/2024 9:17 AM Office of Management and Budget Laura Zautcke Additional Reviewer Completed 03/13/2024 4:01 PM County Manager's Office Amy Patterson Level 4 County Manager Review Completed 03/13/2024 4:19 PM Board of County Commissioners Geoffrey Willig Meeting Pending 03/26/2024 9:00 AM 9.A Packet Pg. 27 PL20230002460 1 STAFF REPORT COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT, ZONING DIVISION, COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING SECTION HEARING DATE: FEBRUARY 1, 2024 SUBJECT: ELEMENTS: PL20230002460 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT (GMPA); GMA COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT (ADOPTION HEARING) COMPANION TO: PL20230002458 GMA COMMERCIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (CPUD) RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SUB-ELEMENT OF THE GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN (GGAMP) AGENT/APPLICANT: Agents: Owners: Bob Mulhere, FAICP Hole Montes, a Bowman Company 950 Encore Way Naples, FL 34110 Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire Coleman Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 Naples, FL 34103 GM Advisors, LLC Michael M. Saadeh, Manager 434 Terracina Court Naples, FL 34119 Collier County Transportation Right-of-Way 2885 Horseshoe Drive South Naples. FL 34104 GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject site is on the south side of Immokalee Road, between Wilson Boulevard and Randall Boulevard (1,000 feet east of Wilson Boulevard and 770 feet west of Randall Boulevard), in Section 27, Township 48 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. It is within the Rural Estates Planning Community. **Revised Post CCPC Meeting 9.A.a Packet Pg. 28 Attachment: CCPC Staff Report GMA (27897 : PL20230002460 GMA Commercial Subdistrict) PL20230002460 2 9.A.aPacket Pg. 29Attachment: CCPC Staff Report GMA (27897 : PL20230002460 GMA Commercial Subdistrict) PL20230002460 3 REQUESTED ACTION: The applicant proposes a small-scale Comprehensive Plan (a/k/a Growth Management Plan) amendment (GMPA) to the Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) to create the GMA Commercial Subdistrict on a 9.84-acre property to amend the Rural Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map (FLUM), and to create the GMA Commercial Subdistrict Map in the FLUM series of the GGAMP. The proposed Growth Management Plan (GMP) amendment text and map are attached as Exhibit “A.” PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The petition proposes to create a commercial subdistrict to allow a maximum of 125,000 square feet of Intermediate Commercial (C-3) Zone District permitted and conditional uses, of which up to 80,000 square feet could be used for Indoor Air-Conditioned Mini and Self-Storage (SIC Code 4225). A companion petition (PL20230002458) would rezone the 9.84-acre property from Estates (E) to GMA Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD). EXISTING CONDITIONS: Subject Property: The aerial map below shows the proposed subdistrict highlighted in yellow, which includes three individual parcels that comprise approximately 9.84 acres in Golden Gate Estates, Unit 23. The zoning is Estates with Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zone W-3 and W-4 (E-ST/W-3-ST/W-4). Tract 35 is the westernmost parcel (2.9 acres), the central parcel is described as Tract 36 (3.79 acres), and Tract 53 is the easternmost parcel (3.75 acres). Tracts 35 and 53 are owned by GM Advisors, LLC (GMA), and Tract 36 (the central tract) is owned by Collier County. The county-owned parcel is used as a drainage facility, and the remaining tracts are undeveloped and heavily vegetated. Surrounding Lands: North: (across Immokalee Road): Future Land Use Designation: Residential Estates Subdistrict. Zoned: Estates and ST/W-4 Overlay Zone. Land Use: Single-family residential and undeveloped parcels. East: (across a canal): Future Land Use Designation: Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict. Zoned: Estates with CU/PU and ST/W-4 Overlay Zone. Land Use: Fire Station, then retail commercial uses. South: Future Land Use Designation: Residential Estates Subdistrict. Zoned: Estates and ST/W-3 and ST/W-4 Overlay Zone. Land Use: Single-family residential and undeveloped parcels. West: Future Land Use Designation: Residential Estates Subdistrict. Zoned: Estates and ST/W-3 Overlay Zone. Land Use: undeveloped parcels. In summary, the existing land uses are residential to the north, south, and west, and a fire station and commercial uses to the east of the proposed subdistrict. Two large-scale mixed-use and commercial projects are developing to the northeast of the property along Immokalee Road. 9.A.a Packet Pg. 30 Attachment: CCPC Staff Report GMA (27897 : PL20230002460 GMA Commercial Subdistrict) PL20230002460 4 BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS: Land Exchange A Land Exchange Agreement (OR6045 PG1878, as amended) (Agreement) exists between GMA and Collier County that will result in the transfer of ownership of the Collier County parcel to GMA and, in exchange, GMA will transfer a five-acre parcel south of and adjacent to the canal to Collier County (the Swap Parcel) as shown in purple on the map, above. In addition to the land exchange, the Agreement states that GMA will design, permit, and construct a new pond and related drainage facilities on the Swap Parcel to provide treatment and attenuation of stormwater runoff for Immokalee Road, at the sole cost and expense of GMA. The Agreement also requires that GMA convey to the County a minimum 20-foot drainage easement on Tract 53 to operate and maintain the drainage improvements directly south of and adjacent to this tract. GGAMP History The Board of County Commissioners (BCC) adopted the Collier County GMP in 1989; it included a policy requiring the adoption of a master plan for the Golden Gate area. In 1991, the GGAMP was adopted. Based upon community input, the GGAMP included specific locational criteria for commercial land uses and E- Estates zoning district conditional uses and included specific landscape buffer and setback requirements for most non-residential use provisions. These use provisions and development standards, as well as various policies, were intentional in an effort to maintain the rural or semi-rural character of Golden Gate Estates and establish greater certainty where non-residential uses could be located; Golden Gate Estates was, and is, viewed distinctly different from the Urban designated area. In 2019, the BCC adopted restudy-based amendments to the GGAMP (more details below). From its inception and continuing through all three of these major amendments, the GGAMP has continued to have specific stringent locational criteria for non-residential uses as well as specific development standards for these uses. GGAMP Restudy and Immokalee Road/Randall Boulevard Planning Study In 2015, the BCC directed staff to conduct a restudy, performed at a high-level review as opposed to a detailed parcel-by-parcel review, and a White Paper was prepared by staff to summarize the process, identify consensus opinions, and include recommended amendments to the GGAMP including dividing the GGAMP into three parts – the Golden Gate City Sub-Element, the Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element, and the Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element (RGGES-E) in which the subject property is located. 9.A.a Packet Pg. 31 Attachment: CCPC Staff Report GMA (27897 : PL20230002460 GMA Commercial Subdistrict) PL20230002460 5 The Immokalee Road/Randall Boulevard Planning Study, required by Policy 3.2.1 in the RGGES-E, was initiated (in 2019 and completed in 2021) to identify land use tools and infrastructure necessary to support future development within the Immokalee Road/Randall Boulevard study area. This study area, comprised of 277 acres, included properties on the north (and west) side of Immokalee Road from the Randall Boulevard intersection to 33rd Avenue Northeast and on the south side of Immokalee Road east of Wilson Boulevard to and including the south side of Randall Boulevard to 8th Street Northeast; the subject property lies within this planning study area. The study made several recommendations regarding the development of non-residential uses in the area, including the community’s preference for mixed-use development and the concentration of commercial uses, such as retail and dining, at the Immokalee Road/Randall Boulevard intersection. The study did not indicate that commercial uses were appropriate west of the canal running north and south of Immokalee Road; the subject property is adjacent to and west of the canal. Justification for the Proposed Amendment The applicant submitted a market analysis in support of the need for the proposed commercial uses. Specifically, the study includes the following: • Collier County's future growth will be located along Immokalee Road to the Rural Land Stewardship area. • The market equilibrium in the area is 53.61 square feet of commercial space per capita based upon 2,113,527 square feet of developed commercial square footage. The Market Study then utilizes the per capita square footage to determine future demand, extrapolating future commercial needs based on population growth; this results in demand for 3,834,211 square feet of commercial square footage in 2033 and 4,768,902 square feet in 2038. However, the Market Study also states that the total supply of commercial square footage is 4,106,891 square feet. • In addition to a supply/demand analysis, the Market Study analysis also considered utilization of an ‘allocation ratio’ which “…measures the amount of additional acreage required in relation to the directly utilized acreage to assure proper market functioning in the sale, usage, and allocation of land.” The Market Study states, “The additional acreage is required in order to maintain market level pricing and to account for the likelihood that certain lands will not be placed on the market for sale during the forecast horizon or may be subject to future environmental constraints. Thus, the lands allocated in the FLUM should be considerably greater than those that will actually be used or developed.” • The Market Study identifies the 5-mile market area allocation ratio at 1.94, based on total approved commercial supply and existing population. According to the Market Study, the current Countywide allocation ratio is 1.15, while the State of Florida of Commerce recommends an allocation ratio of 1.25. The determination is that additional land for commercial uses is warranted. • The allowance for indoor self-storage, if developed, is determined based upon a formula of need in urban areas; however, an adjustment was made to accommodate for the rural location. Typically, the urbanized area calculated storage needs as 9.7 square feet per capita, and the rural adjustment is 6.84 square feet per capita. • The current demand for self-storage in the 5-mile market area is unmet as there are no existing facilities in the market area. The closest facilities include the 77,735 square foot StorQuest facility that is currently under construction at Collier Boulevard and Immokalee Road, located 7.37 miles to the west, and a CubeSmart facility in Ave Maria, which is 91,759 square feet and located 13.95 miles to the east. Within the market area, three approved but unbuilt facilities will satisfy the existing demand in the market area. The Market Study notes that there will be a need for additional storage facilities through the year 2033. A recent staff analysis regarding commercial inventory in the Immokalee Road/Oil Well Road area results in accounting for over four million square feet of commercial use, including Immokalee Road Rural Village Overlay and the commercial uses approved in the Rural Land Stewardship Overlay (RLSA). This accounting is consistent with the numbers utilized in the Market Study; however, staff identified several concerns: 9.A.a Packet Pg. 32 Attachment: CCPC Staff Report GMA (27897 : PL20230002460 GMA Commercial Subdistrict) PL20230002460 6 • Based on the existing commercial square footage allowed by the FLUM, the commercial demand is met through the 2033 10-year planning horizon. The documentation provided identified the need for 3,834,211 square feet in 2033, which is less than the 4,106,891 square feet currently allowed. The commercial square footage currently allowed is 50% greater (1,993,364 square feet) than is currently developed in the market area. • The use of an allocation ratio includes a statement that the existing allowed commercial square footage may not develop; therefore, the FLUM should allow considerably greater acreage for commercial use than is anticipated by market demand. • The analysis for the storage facility in the Rural Estates adjusted the per capita square footage due to location; however, the demographics, lifestyle, and size of properties in the Rural Estates are very different from the urbanized areas, resulting in different needs for storage facilities. • The Market Study utilized 2.9 persons per household (PPH), which exceeds the US Department of Census, which utilizes 2.4 PPH. Buffer Requirements for Neighborhood Centers in the GGAMP: “Commercial projects directly abutting residential property (property zoned E-Estates and without an approved conditional use) shall provide, at a minimum, a seventy-five (75) foot wide buffer in which no parking uses are permitted. Twenty-five (25) feet of the width of the buffer along the developed area shall be a landscape buffer. A minimum of fifty (50) feet of the buffer width shall consist of retained native vegetation and must be consistent with the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC). The native vegetation retention area may consist of a perimeter berm and be used for water management detention.” Additional criteria apply to newly constructed berms and using the native vegetation retention area for water management purposes. The purpose of the buffer is to protect the rural character of the area, particularly for abutting properties zoned (E) that are residential or may develop with residential use. The proposed CPUD Master Plan identifies buffers that do not meet the GGAMP buffer provisions based on the proposed buffer widths and plantings in the CPUD Master Plan. Given that the proposed use intensity is similar to the Neighborhood Center designation (C-3 uses) and exceeds it (self-storage use), staff believes it appropriate to apply the same buffer requirements as exists in the Neighborhood Center designation. The GGAMP buffer provisions also include a requirement for a 25-foot buffer abutting the external road right-of-way, with specific planting requirements. The petition proposes a 15-foot enhanced Type D Limited Buffer Easement (LBE) along Immokalee Road, and though the proposed buffer does not meet the 25-foot width, the plantings proposed are consistent with those required by the GGAMP. The GMPA petition states that the justification for the reduction of the buffers is to maximize the developable area to offset the cost of County stormwater improvements that the applicant will make to the Swap Parcel, improvements required by the Land Exchange Agreement. While staff acknowledges this cost burden, the petitioner also reaps significant benefits from the land swap; rather than having two parcels with road frontage that are non-contiguous and a third parcel with no road frontage, the petitioner will have all three parcels with road frontage and that are all contiguous. Staff notes that the reduction of the western and northern buffers may be justified by the construction of the County stormwater facility; however, the southern buffer is necessary to protect the residences that exist to the south, and the reduction in the buffer from 75 feet to 50 feet may not be sufficient protection from the noise and visual impacts typically associated with commercial uses. Staff recommends that the CCPC consider a provision for an opaque fence or wall, per LDC 4.06.02.c.2. for landscape buffers within the 50- foot southern buffer to protect the existing residences approximately 350 to 400 feet from the boundary of the commercial development. The original submittal did include a wall in the buffers, as shown below. However, the western buffer was reduced in subsequent submittals, and the wall was removed from the south and west buffers. The original exhibit, submitted in April 2023, includes an 8-foot wall below. 9.A.a Packet Pg. 33 Attachment: CCPC Staff Report GMA (27897 : PL20230002460 GMA Commercial Subdistrict) PL20230002460 7 Staff includes a graphic below identifying the general location, the subject property, the SWAP Parcel, and the proposed buffers – 25 feet on the west and 50 feet on the south. Staff has identified the need for additional protective measures for the existing residences to the south due to the reduction in the buffer and therefore recommends the provision of an opaque fence or wall along this buffer. 9.A.a Packet Pg. 34 Attachment: CCPC Staff Report GMA (27897 : PL20230002460 GMA Commercial Subdistrict) PL20230002460 8 Transitional Conditional Use Provision: The GGAMP states that conditional uses may be granted in transitional areas, which are defined as being located between existing non-residential and residential uses. If the GMPA and CPUD are approved, this provision would allow for the granting of E-Estates zoning district conditional uses on the property adjacent to the west. Environmental Review: Environmental Planning staff has reviewed the petition to address environmental concerns. The required preserve is 0.88 acres (15% of 5.86 acres); the applicant proposes to retain the native vegetation through a Native Vegetation Buffer along the western and southern boundaries of the project. The environmental data indicates the proposed project is in an area that has the potential to contain a variety of protected animal species. Listed wildlife species observed on the site include gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus); two burrows were observed onsite. The proposed project is within the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) consultation area for Bonneted Bats (Eumops floridanus). Several pine trees with cavities were observed; however, no evidence was found indicating Bonneted Bats was utilizing the trees. The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) wildlife data indicates the presence of Black Bear (Ursus americanus floridanus) in the area. A black bear management plan will need to be included at PPL and/or SDP review. Additionally, the property contains potential habitat for the Eastern Indigo Snake (Drymarchon corais couperi), the Red-Cockaded Woodpecker (Leuconotopicus Borealis), and Big Cypress Fox Squirrel (Sciurus niger Avicennia), and the Florida Panther (Puma concolor coryi). There was no evidence these species were utilizing the site. The property is in Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay zones (ST/W-3) and (ST-W/4). Groundwater protection must be addressed in accordance with LDC Section 3.06.12. This project does not require an Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews, as identified in Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. Environmental Services staff recommends approval of the proposed petition. Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental review staff has found this project to be consistent with the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME). The project site consists of 5.86 acres of native vegetation. A maximum of 0.88 acres (15%) of the native vegetation is required to be preserved. Transportation Element: In evaluating this project, staff reviewed the applicant’s July 21, 2023, Traffic Impact Statement for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) using the 2022 and 2023 Annual Update and Inventory Reports (AUIR). Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP states; “The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and 9.A.a Packet Pg. 35 Attachment: CCPC Staff Report GMA (27897 : PL20230002460 GMA Commercial Subdistrict) PL20230002460 9 c.For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project’s significant impacts on all roadways.” Staff finding: According to the TIS provided with this petition the proposed development will generate a projected total of +/- 389 PM peak hour, 2-way trips on the adjacent roadway segments of Immokalee Road and Randall Boulevard. The trips generated by this development will occur on the following adjacent roadway link: Link/Roadway Link Current Peak Hour Peak Direction Volume/Peak Direction Projected P.M. Peak Hour/Peak Direction Project Trips (1) 2022 AUIR LOS/ Remaining Capacity 2023 AUIR LOS/ Remaining Capacity 45.0/Immokalee Road Wilson Blvd. to Oil Well Rd 3,300/East 150/East D/ 782 D/ 414 (2) 46.0/Immokalee Road Oil Well Rd to SR-29 900/East 48/East D/ 138 D/ 71 (2) 132.0/Randall Boulevard Immokalee Rd to Everglades Blvd 900/East 45/East D/ 95 D/ 92 (2) •(1) Source for P.M. Peak Hour/Peak Direction Project Traffic is from the July 21, 2023 Traffic Impact Statement provided by the petitioner. •(2) Expected Deficiency due to Trip Bank not caused by this proposed development (see State Statute 169.3180). Deficiency was found in the current 2023 AUIR and the previous 2022 AUIR. Provisions of Florida Statute 163.3180: Must allow an applicant to enter into a binding agreement to pay or construct their proportionatefair share. Facilities determined to be deficient with existing, committed, and vested trips plus projectedbackground traffic from any source other than the development shall be removed from theproportionate share calculation. The improvement necessary to correct this type of deficiency is the funding responsibility of themaintaining entity. Applicant must receive a credit for the anticipated road impact fees. The expected and existing deficiencies are not caused by this proposed development. The following network improvements are included in the 5-year work program: •Intersection improvements at Immokalee and Randall include a 4-lane expansion of Randall from Immokalee to 8th Street. •Vanderbilt Beach Extension east of Collier Boulevard. This improvement is currently projected to have a +/-5% capacity increase for this section of Immokalee. Phase one of this project is expected to be completed in +/-18 months, and phase two should be completed +/-12 months post-phase one. Based on the TIS, 2022, the 2023 AUIR, and the provisions of State Statute 169.3180, the subject PUD can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan. The Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) indicates that the adjacent roadway network has sufficient capacity to accommodate this project within the 5-year planning period. 9.A.a Packet Pg. 36 Attachment: CCPC Staff Report GMA (27897 : PL20230002460 GMA Commercial Subdistrict) PL20230002460 10 Transportation Review: The Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petition for compliance with the GMP and the LDC. Transportation Planning Staff recommends approval of the proposed GMA CPUD/Immokalee Randall PUDZ. Public Utilities Review: The project lies within the regional potable water service area and the North County wastewater service area of the Collier County Water-Sewer District (CCWSD). Water and wastewater services are available via existing infrastructure within the adjacent right-of-way. Sufficient water and wastewater treatment capacities are available. Any improvements to the CCWSD’s water or wastewater systems necessary to provide sufficient capacity to serve the project will be the responsibility of the owner/developer and will be conveyed to the CCWSD at no cost to the County at the time of utility acceptance. Stormwater Review: Project design must satisfy the Collier County GMP Public Facilities Element – Stormwater Management Sub-Element. • Stormwater system water quality retention and detention criteria shall be one hundred and fifty percent (150%) of the volumetric requirements provided in the ERP AH Vol II for use within the geographic limits of the SFWMD (2014). • Allowable project off-site discharge rate shall not exceed the discharge rate of Corkscrew Canal Basin (0.04 cfs/ ac) and shall be computed using a storm event of 3-day duration and 25-year return frequency. Landscape Review: Although the North, South, and West buffers proposed are reduced in width from what is typically provided to help meet the goals and objectives of the Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub Element, namely preserving the area's rural character, staff recognizes the unique circumstance with this particular petition with the improvements that the applicant will be making to the future County stormwater management lake on an abutting parcel to the South and the need for the applicant to offset those costs by having additional developable land. Typically, a 75’ wide buffer is provided where non-residential development abuts Estates zoning in the Rural Golden Gate Estates (along the South and West boundaries of this project). The application is proposing a 50’ wide buffer along the South that will be required to meet the standards of a Type B buffer after removal of exotics. If not, supplemental planting will be required as necessary to meet the Type B buffer standard (1 tree every 25’ and a row of 5’ high shrubs). An opaque fence or wall is being requested by staff where abutting Estates Zones lots at the time of SDP. The 10’ wide buffer proposed along the West in the event that the parcel to the West is rezoned to allow for non-residential use would be consistent with the LDC. Typically, a 25’ wide buffer is provided where abutting right of ways in Rural Golden Gate Estates. This project proposes a 15’ wide buffer along Randall Blvd. However, the applicant is committing to meet the vegetation standards for this buffer typically required in the Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element. The width of the buffer required along the East is 10’. Although the East buffer is labeled as 5’, it is not uncommon for a portion of landscape buffers to overlap other easements with the plantings being located in the portion of the LBE outside of the other easements. For this project, the plantings will be located in the easement labeled as 5’ LBE, with the balance of the buffer width overlapping with the adjacent access/maintenance easement. 9.A.a Packet Pg. 37 Attachment: CCPC Staff Report GMA (27897 : PL20230002460 GMA Commercial Subdistrict) PL20230002460 11 CRITERIA FOR GMP AMENDMENTS FLORIDA STATUTES: Data and analysis requirements for comprehensive plans and plan amendments are noted in Chapter 163, F.S., specifically listed below. Section 163.3177(1)(f), Florida Statutes: (f) All mandatory and optional elements of the comprehensive plan and plan amendments shall be based upon relevant and appropriate data and an analysis by the local government that may include, but not be limited to, surveys, studies, community goals and vision, and other data available at the time of adoption of the comprehensive plan or plan amendment. To be based on data means to react to it in an appropriate way and to the extent necessary, indicated by the data available on that particular subject at the time of adoption of the plan or plan amendment at issue. 1. Surveys, studies, and data utilized in the preparation of the comprehensive plan may not be deemed a part of the comprehensive plan unless adopted as a part of it. Copies of such studies, surveys, data, and supporting documents for proposed plans and plan amendments shall be made available for public inspection, and copies of such plans shall be made available to the public upon payment of reasonable charges for reproduction. Support data or summaries are not subject to the compliance review process, but the comprehensive plan must be clearly based on appropriate data. Support data or summaries may be used to aid in the determination of compliance and consistency. 2. Data must be taken from professionally accepted sources. The application of a methodology utilized in data collection or whether a particular methodology is professionally accepted may be evaluated. However, the evaluation may not include whether one accepted methodology is better than another. Original data collection by local governments is not required. However, local governments may use original data so long as methodologies are professionally accepted. 3. The comprehensive plan shall be based upon permanent and seasonal population estimates and projections, which shall either be those published by the Office of Economic and Demographic Research or generated by the local government based upon a professionally acceptable methodology. The plan must be based on at least the minimum amount of land required to accommodate the medium projections published by the Office of Economic and Demographic Research for at least a 10-year planning period unless otherwise limited under s. 380.05, including related rules of the Administration Commission. Absent physical limitations on population growth, population projections for each municipality and the unincorporated area within a county must, at a minimum, be reflective of each area’s proportional share of the total county population and the total county population growth. Section 163.3177(6)(a)2. Florida Statutes: 2. The future land use plan and plan amendments shall be based upon surveys, studies, and data regarding the area, as applicable, including: a. The amount of land required to accommodate anticipated growth. b. The projected permanent and seasonal population of the area. c. The character of undeveloped land. d. The availability of water supplies, public facilities, and services. e. The need for redevelopment, including the renewal of blighted areas and the elimination of nonconforming uses inconsistent with the community’s character. f. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to or closely proximate to military installations. g. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to an airport as defined in s. 330.35 and consistent with s. 333.02. h. The discouragement of urban sprawl. 9.A.a Packet Pg. 38 Attachment: CCPC Staff Report GMA (27897 : PL20230002460 GMA Commercial Subdistrict) PL20230002460 12 i.The need for job creation, capital investment, and economic development that will strengthen and diversify the community’s economy. j.The need to modify land uses and development patterns within antiquated subdivisions. Section 163.3177(6)(a)8. Florida Statutes: (a)A future land use plan element designating proposed future general distribution, location, and extent of the uses of land for residential uses, commercial uses, industry, agriculture, recreation, conservation, education, public facilities, and other categories of the public and private uses of land. The approximate acreage and the general range of density or intensity of use shall be provided for the gross land area included in each existing land use category. The element shall establish the long-term end toward which land use programs and activities are ultimately directed. 8. Future land use map amendments shall be based upon the following analyses: a. An analysis of the availability of facilities and services. b.An analysis of the suitability of the plan amendment for its proposed use considering the character of the undeveloped land, soils, topography, natural resources, and historic resources on site. c.An analysis of the minimum amount of land needed to achieve the goals and requirements of this section. The petitioner must provide appropriate and relevant data and analysis to address the statutory requirements for a Plan Amendment. For this petition, a narrative justification (Exhibit V.D.1 “Project Narrative, Criteria, and Consistency”) and a Market Analysis were provided as part of the petition. Section 163.3187 Florida Statutes: Process for adoption of small-scale comprehensive plan amendment. [criteria to qualify as a small-scale GMPA] (1)A small-scale development amendment may be adopted under the following conditions: a) The proposed amendment involves a use of 50 acres or fewer. [The subject site comprises±9.84 acres.] b) The proposed amendment does not involve a text change to the goals, policies, and objectives of the local government’s comprehensive plan but only proposes a land use change to the future land use map for a site-specific small-scale development activity. However, text changes that relate directly to and are adopted simultaneously with the small-scale future land use map amendment shall be permissible under this section. [This amendment includes a text change to the Comprehensive Plan, which is directly related to the proposed future land use map amendment.] (2)c) The property that is the subject of the proposed amendment is not located within an area of critical state concern unless the project subject to the proposed amendment involves the construction of affordable housing units meeting the criteria of s. 420.0004(3) and is located within an area of critical state concern designated by s. 380.0552 or by the Administration Commission pursuant to s. 380.05(1). [The subject property is not located within an Area of Critical State Concern.](3)(4)Comprehensive plans may only be amended in such a way as to preserve the internal consistency of the plan pursuant to s. 163.3177. Corrections, updates, or modifications of current costs which were set out as part of the comprehensive plan shall not, for the purposes of this act, be deemed to be amendments. [This amendment preserves the internal consistency of the plan and is not a correction, update, or modification of current costs that were set out as part of the comprehensive plan.] 9.A.a Packet Pg. 39 Attachment: CCPC Staff Report GMA (27897 : PL20230002460 GMA Commercial Subdistrict) PL20230002460 13 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM) NOTES: The applicant conducted a NIM on August 7, 2023, at the UF/IFAS Extension at 14700 Immokalee Road in Naples. The meeting commenced at 5:30 p.m., and approximately seven (7) people were in attendance, with an additional two (2) people on Zoom. Bob Mulhere, FAICP, the agent, gave a brief presentation after the introduction of his team and county staff. Mr. Mulhere explained the request for the proposed rezone and the companion small-scale Growth Management Plan amendment. The following comments/questions were raised by members of the public in attendance, including the proposed commercial uses that may occur on the site, traffic generation, and site design questions such as interconnections. The NIM summary, PowerPoint presentation, and sign-in sheet are included in the CCPC backup materials. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: •The GMA Commercial Subdistrict petition proposes a small-scale Growth Management Plan amendment to create a ±9.84 subdistrict to allow 125,000 square feet of commercial floor area, of which up to 80,000 square feet could be indoor self-storage. •There are no adverse environmental impacts as a result of this petition. •No historical or archaeological sites are affected by this amendment. •There are no public utility-related concerns as a result of this petition. •There are no concerns about impacts on other public infrastructure. •Staff has identified issues regarding the need for additional commercial square footage in this area of the county, given that the GMP currently allows over four million square feet of commercial square footage. The needs analysis provided for the petition utilizes both a supply/demand analysis as well as an allocation ratio to support the 125,000 square feet of commercial space proposed for the project. It appears that the supply/demand analysis has identified that the existing commercial square footage is sufficient past 2033 but not sufficient in 2038. Staff has determined that consideration of public benefit derived from the Swap Parcel and the construction of the stormwater improvements by the developer may be sufficient justification for the GMPA. •The location of the proposed commercial project in the Rural Golden Gate Estates area west of Randall Boulevard is not well supported by the GGAMP, nor is it supported by the Immokalee Road/Randall Boulevard Planning Study. This petition would provide for commercial ‘creep’ along Immokalee Road to the west. •The proposed buffers do not meet the 75-foot minimum width required by the GGAMP for a comparable provision for commercial uses (Neighborhood Center Subdistrict), which staff believes is appropriate to apply. The reduction in the buffer widths, as requested, may be justified in some locations to offset costs of the developer constructing the County stormwater facility on the Swap Parcel; however, staff recommends a provision for an opaque fence or wall, per LDC 4.06.02.c.2, within the 50-foot southern buffer to protect the existing residences adjacent to the project area. If a wall is not provided, then the buffer should be required to meet the minimum 75-foot width. LEGAL REVIEW: The County Attorney’s office reviewed the staff report on January 9, 2024. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Collier County Planning Commission forward petition PL20230002460 GMA Commercial Subdistrict GMPA to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation to approve and adopt and transmit to the Florida Department of Commerce and other statutorily required agencies with the following modifications— with a recommendation for 9.A.a Packet Pg. 40 Attachment: CCPC Staff Report GMA (27897 : PL20230002460 GMA Commercial Subdistrict) PL20230002460 14 with an opaque fence or wall along the south perimeter of the PUD an opaque fence or wall along the southern perimeter of the PUD per LDC 4.06.02.c.2 for landscape buffers. - as depicted below: GMA Commercial Subdistrict The GMA Commercial Subdistrict is ±9.84 acres in size and located adjacent to and south of Immokalee Road, approximately 773 feet west of the intersection of Immokalee Road and Randall Boulevard. The subdistrict is comprised of the following properties: Tracts 35, 36, and 53, Golden Gate Estates, Unit 23. The Subdistrict has been designated on the Rural Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map and the GMA Commercial Subdistrict map. The intent of this subdistrict is to provide a variety of commercial uses and services to the area. Development within the Subdistrict shall be subject to the following: a.The subdistrict shall be rezoned to a Planned Unit Development (PUD). b.Development shall be limited to a maximum intensity of 125,000 square feet of gross floor area (GFA) of Commercial Intermediate, C-3 zoning district uses, and Indoor Air- Conditioned Mini and Self-Storage (SIC 4225), of which self-storage will be limited to 80,000 square feet of GFA. c.The PUD must include development standards and perimeter buffering to ensure compatibility with adjacent lands, as follows: (1) North Perimeter Buffer - Adjacent to Immokalee Road: A 15’wide buffer, with canopy trees placed 25’ on center, and a double hedge row consisting of shrubs 24” in height spaced 3’ on center. A minimum of 50% of the buffer area shall be comprised of meandering shrubs, and ground covers other than sod. (2) West Perimeter Buffer: A minimum 25-foot-wide native vegetation retention buffer area along the western perimeter. Retained native vegetation within this buffer may be used to satisfy the LDC native vegetation retention requirement. The retained native vegetation within this buffer may be used to meet the LDC buffer planting requirements after exotic vegetation removal in accordance with LDC Sec. 4.06.02 and 4.06.05.E.1. Supplemental plantings utilizing native plant materials may be required in accordance with LDC Section 3.05.07, to ensure that 80% opacity is achieved within one year of planting. The type, size, and number of such plantings, if necessary, will be determined at time of initial SDP or plat and included on the landscape plans for the SDP or plat. No additional setbacks from this native vegetation buffer area shall be required. If, at the time of issuance of the first building permit for a commercial structure within this Subdistrict, the property to the west has been rezoned to allow for non-residential use, the 25-foot-wide native vegetation buffer area along the western perimeter may be reduced to a 10’ Type A buffer. (3) South Perimeter Buffer: A minimum 50-foot-wide native vegetation retention buffer area shall be required. Up to 25% of the width of the buffer may be utilized for 9.A.a Packet Pg. 41 Attachment: CCPC Staff Report GMA (27897 : PL20230002460 GMA Commercial Subdistrict) PL20230002460 15 stormwater management. Retained native vegetation within this buffer may be used to satisfy the LDC native vegetation retention requirement. The retained native vegetation within this buffer may be used to meet the LDC buffer planting requirements after exotic vegetation removal in accordance with LDC Sec. 4.06.02 and 4.06.05.E.1. Supplemental plantings utilizing native plant materials may be required in accordance with LDC Section 3.05.07, to ensure that 80% opacity is achieved within one year of planting. The type, size, and number of such plantings, if necessary, will be determined at time of initial SDP or plat and included on the landscape plans for the SDP or plat. No additional setbacks from these native vegetation buffer areas shall be required. (4) East Perimeter Buffer: A minimum 5-foot-wide Type A buffer shall be provided 58 feet from the eastern property line. d. The following uses shall be prohibited: 1. Educational plants and public schools; 2. Funeral services; 3. Gasoline service stations; and 4. Group care facilities. 9.A.a Packet Pg. 42 Attachment: CCPC Staff Report GMA (27897 : PL20230002460 GMA Commercial Subdistrict) [23-CMP-01170/1843557/1]100 1 of 3 GMA Commercial Subdistrict SSGMPA PL20230002460 2/5/24 ORDINANCE NO. 2024-___ AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 89-05, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SUB-ELEMENT AND FUTURE LAND USE MAP OF THE GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN ELEMENT BY CHANGING THE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF PROPERTY FROM ESTATES MIXED USE DISTRICT, RESIDENTIAL ESTATES SUBDISTRICT TO ESTATES- COMMERCIAL, GMA COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT TO ALLOW 125,000 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF COMMERCIAL INTERMEDIATE (C-3) AND INDOOR AIR- CONDITIONED MINI AND SELF-STORAGE (SIC 4225) USES, OF WHICH UP TO 80,000 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR AREA MAY CONSIST OF INDOOR AIR-CONDITIONED MINI AND SELF- STORAGE. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED SOUTH OF IMMOKALEE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 773 FEET WEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF IMMOKALEE ROAD AND RANDALL BOULEVARD IN SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, CONSISTING OF 9.84± ACRES; AND FURTHERMORE, DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE ADOPTED AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PL20230002460] WHEREAS, Collier County, pursuant to Section 163.3161, et. seq., Florida Statutes, the Florida Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, was required to prepare and adopt a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners adopted the Collier County Growth Management Plan on January 10, 1989; and WHEREAS, the Community Planning Act of 2011 provides authority for local governments to amend their respective comprehensive plans and outlines certain procedures to amend adopted comprehensive plans; and WHEREAS, GM Advisors, LLC requested an amendment to the Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element of Future Land Use Map of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element to create the GMA Commercial Subdistrict; and 9.A.b Packet Pg. 43 Attachment: Exhibit A - Ordinance 020524 (27897 : PL20230002460 GMA Commercial Subdistrict) [23-CMP-01170/1843557/1]100 2 of 3 GMA Commercial Subdistrict SSGMPA PL20230002460 2/5/24 WHEREAS, pursuant to Subsection 163.3187(1), Florida Statutes, this amendment is considered a Small-Scale Amendment; and WHEREAS, the Subdistrict property is not located in a rural area of opportunity; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) on February 1, 2024 considered the proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan and recommended denial of said amendment to the Board of County Commissioners; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County did take action in the manner prescribed by law and held public hearings concerning the proposed adoption of the amendment to the Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element and Future Land Use Map of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element of the Growth Management Plan on ______________; and WHEREAS, all applicable substantive and procedural requirements of law have been met. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: ADOPTION OF AMENDMENT TO THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN The Board of County Commissioners hereby adopts this small-scale amendment to the Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element and Future Land Use Map of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element in accordance with Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes. The text amendment is attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION TWO: SEVERABILITY. If any phrase or portion of this Ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion. SECTION THREE: EFFECTIVE DATE. The effective date of this plan amendment, if the amendment is not timely challenged, shall be 31 days after Board adoption. If timely challenged, this amendment shall become effective on the date the state land planning agency or the Administration Commission enters a final order determining this adopted amendment to be in compliance. No development orders, development permits, or land uses dependent on this amendment may be issued or commence before it has become effective. 9.A.b Packet Pg. 44 Attachment: Exhibit A - Ordinance 020524 (27897 : PL20230002460 GMA Commercial Subdistrict) [23-CMP-01170/1843557/1]100 3 of 3 GMA Commercial Subdistrict SSGMPA PL20230002460 2/5/24 PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida this _______ day of ________________, 2024. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By:________________________ By:_________________________________ Deputy Clerk Chris Hall, Chairman Approved as to form and legality: ________________________________ Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney Attachment: Exhibit A – Proposed Text Amendment & Map Amendment 9.A.b Packet Pg. 45 Attachment: Exhibit A - Ordinance 020524 (27897 : PL20230002460 GMA Commercial Subdistrict) Page 1 of 3 GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTERPLAN RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SUB-ELEMENT B. LAND USE DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION SECTION 1. ESTATES DESIGNATION B. Estates – Commercial 3. Immokalee Road – Estates Commercial Subdistrict 4. GMA Commercial Subdistrict B. LAND USE DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION SECTION 1. ESTATES DESIGNATION B. Estates – Commercial 3. Immokalee Road – Estates Commercial Subdistrict 4. GMA Commercial Subdistrict The GMA Commercial Subdistrict is ±9.84 acres in size and located adjacent to and south of Immokalee Road, approximately 773 feet west of the intersection of Immokalee Road and Randall Boulevard. The subdistrict is comprised of the following properties: Tracts 35, 36, and 53, Golden Gate Estates, Unit 23. The Subdistrict has been designated on the Rural Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map and the GMA Commercial Subdistrict map. The intent of this subdistrict is to provide a variety of commercial uses and services to the area. Development within the Subdistrict shall be subject to the following: a. The subdistrict shall be rezoned to a Planned Unit Development (PUD). 9.A.b Packet Pg. 46 Attachment: Exhibit A - Ordinance 020524 (27897 : PL20230002460 GMA Commercial Subdistrict) Page 2 of 3 b. Development shall be limited to a maximum intensity of 125,000 square feet of gross floor area (GFA) of Commercial Intermediate, C-3 zoning district uses, and Indoor Air- Conditioned Mini and Self-Storage (SIC 4225) of which self-storage will be limited to 80,000 square feet of GFA. c. The PUD must include development standards and perimeter buffering to ensure compatibility with adjacent lands, as follows: (1) North Perimeter Buffer - Adjacent to Immokalee Road: A 15’wide buffer, with two rows of trees spaced 30’ on center, and a double hedge row consisting of shrubs 24” in height spaced 3’ on center. A minimum of 50% of the buffer area shall be comprised of meandering shrubs and ground covers other than sod. (2) West Perimeter Buffer: A minimum 25-foot-wide native vegetation retention buffer area along the western perimeter. Retained native vegetation within this buffer may be used to satisfy the LDC native vegetation retention requirement. The retained native vegetation within this buffer may be used to meet the LDC buffer planting requirements after exotic vegetation removal in accordance with LDC Sec. 4.06.02 and 4.06.05.E.1. Supplemental plantings utilizing native plant materials may be required in accordance with LDC Section 3.05.07, to ensure that 80% opacity is achieved within one year of planting. The type, size, and number of such plantings, if necessary, will be determined at time of initial SDP or plat and included on the landscape plans for the SDP or plat. No additional setbacks from this native vegetation buffer area shall be required. If, at the time of issuance of the first building permit for a commercial structure within this Subdistrict, the property to the west has been rezoned to allow for non-residential use, the 25-foot-wide native vegetation buffer area along the western perimeter may be reduced to a 10’ Type A buffer. (3) South Perimeter Buffer: A minimum 50-foot-wide native vegetation retention buffer area along the southern perimeter shall be required. Up to 25% of the width of the buffer may be utilized for stormwater management. Retained native vegetation within this buffer may be used to satisfy the LDC native vegetation retention requirement. The retained native vegetation within this buffer may be used to meet the LDC buffer planting requirements after exotic vegetation removal in accordance with LDC Sec. 4.06.02 and 4.06.05.E.1. Supplemental plantings utilizing native plant materials may be required in accordance with LDC Section 3.05.07, to ensure that 80% opacity is achieved within one year of planting. The type, size, and number of such plantings, if necessary, will be determined at time of initial SDP or plat and included on the landscape plans for the SDP or plat. No additional setbacks from these native vegetation buffer areas shall be required. (4) East Perimeter Buffer: A minimum 5-foot-wide Type A buffer shall be provided 58 feet from the eastern property line. d. The following uses shall be prohibited: 1. Educational plants and public schools; 2. Funeral services; 9.A.b Packet Pg. 47 Attachment: Exhibit A - Ordinance 020524 (27897 : PL20230002460 GMA Commercial Subdistrict) Exhibit A PL20230002460 Page 3 of 5 Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted. 1/8/2024 3. Gasoline service stations; and 4. Group care facilities. C. List of Maps Immokalee Road – Estates Commercial Subdistrict GMA Commercial Subdistrict 9.A.b Packet Pg. 48 Attachment: Exhibit A - Ordinance 020524 (27897 : PL20230002460 GMA Commercial Subdistrict) Exhibit A PL20230002460 Page 4 of 5 Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted. 1/8/2024 9.A.b Packet Pg. 49 Attachment: Exhibit A - Ordinance 020524 (27897 : PL20230002460 GMA Commercial Subdistrict) Exhibit A PL20230002460 Page 5 of 5 Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted. 1/8/2024 9.A.b Packet Pg. 50 Attachment: Exhibit A - Ordinance 020524 (27897 : PL20230002460 GMA Commercial Subdistrict) 9.A.ePacket Pg. 51Attachment: Exhibit D - Affidavit of Sign Posting (27897 : PL20230002460 GMA Commercial Subdistrict) 9.A.e Packet Pg. 52 Attachment: Exhibit D - Affidavit of Sign Posting (27897 : PL20230002460 GMA Commercial Subdistrict) 9.A.f Packet Pg. 53 Attachment: legal ad - agenda IDs 27897 & 27927 (27897 : PL20230002460 GMA Commercial Subdistrict) 9.A.f Packet Pg. 54 Attachment: legal ad - agenda IDs 27897 & 27927 (27897 : PL20230002460 GMA Commercial Subdistrict) 9.A.f Packet Pg. 55 Attachment: legal ad - agenda IDs 27897 & 27927 (27897 : PL20230002460 GMA Commercial Subdistrict) 9.A.fPacket Pg. 56Attachment: legal ad - agenda IDs 27897 & 27927 (27897 : PL20230002460 GMA Commercial Subdistrict) The original name of the proposed PUD was the Immokalee Randall ImJL mokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict. To avoid confusion with similarly named PUDs and Subdistricts, :PUD; and the GMP Subdistrict was the the names were changed at the request of County staff, to the GMA CPUD and the GMA Commercial Subdistrict. The names were not updated on the supporting application materials and exhib 1tS, as the name change has no material effect on these documents or exhibits, only on the documents that will be included in the recorded ordinances: the Proposed GMPA Amendment Language, Master Plan, and CPUD Document. e�r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GR0INTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercauntvfl.�ov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 �239} 252-2400 Pre -Application M�etin� Notes PUD Rezone (PUDZ)& Companion Petition Type: GMP Amendment (GMPA) Date and Time: Wednesday 3 / 15 / 2 3 at_ 1 : 3 0 PM Laura DeJohn - PUDZ Assigned Planner: Kathy Eastley - GMPA Engineering Manager {for PPL's and FP's): Project Information Randall Blvd - Immokalee Road (PUDZ) Project Name: Randall Blvd-Immokalee Road Subdistrict (GMPA) 20230002458 (PUDZ) PL#: 20230002460 (GMPA) 37742880001, Property ID #: 37'744000009 Current Zoning: Estates (E) 13 0 62 Irrlmokalee R ad Naples FL 3 41_ 2 0 Project Address: City: State: Zip: Applicant: Hole Montes, Inc . - Stephanie Karol Agent Name: Bob Mulhere, President Phone: Agent/Firm Address: 950 Encore Wa 239-2��4-2018 City: Naples State: FZ Zip; 34110 Property Owner: GM Advisors LLC & Collier Cnty Transportation Right-of-way Please provide the following, if applicable: i. Total Acreage: 10 . 4 4 ii. Proposed # of Residential Units: iii. Proposed Commercial Square Footage: iv. For Amendments, indicate the original petition number: v. If there is an Ordinance or Resolution associated with this project, please indicate the type and number: vi. If the project is within a Plat, provide the name and AR#/PL#: Updated 1/12/2021 Page (1 of 5 CoL� Lie��unty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercountyfl.�ov Meeting Notes 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE MAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 �239) 252-2400 As of 10/16/2017 all Zoning applications have revised applications, and your associated Application is included in your notes; additionally a *new Property Ownership Disclosure Form is required far all applications. A copy of this new form is included in your pre-app Nate —link is httgs://v�rww.colliercountvfl.Qov/Home/ShowDocument?id=75093 �Zo ry � ry � r �� n r�- .� �vh n> -- �¢�a-- �-��t�o n Q �u �-��� r✓v,7"� /V D T�� �o.� P �L�,N6 - �a7�w E,�s czar - 5�.� .�ir,�h.�a N��-.�s �,� �►� 0�. -, _ Lc C..� L �' � .a.,S - to �v � �-- �� � r�- .�- C'a�'T"�-�T` �o c� _�. L.► � �� v S --- .LSTt o � S �' l�.tl�� �+c.w C°v•v6 h-�.7-" / lv F� a N 7'r�-cr �'ry �o �� per ��e�. S -- G � w d �'�9-w7-/i/�>��c,,a L�r-s..� C:�.c.�--r�. Zr w� �, If Site is within the City of Naples Water Service Area please send to Naples Utilities and Planning Departments. Then, if the petition is submitted, we are to send it (by email) to the four persons below in their Utilities and Planning Depts. -along with a request that they send us a letter or email of "no objection" to the petition. Bob Middleton RMidd(eton(a�naplesgov.com Allyson Holland AMHolland(c�naplesgov.com Robin Singer RSinger(a�naplesgov.com Erica Martin emar�tin(c�naplesgov.com , Disclaimer: Information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may ��ot fully inform tf�e applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LDC dictates tine regu;ations which a!1 applications must satisfy. Any cf�ecklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required dafa. Updated 1/12/2021 Page � 2 of 5 ThomaSUarkevEN From: LauraDeJOhnVEN Sent: Monday, March 27, 2023 7:25 AM To: ThomasClarkeVEN Subject: RE: Pre Application Meeting notes PL20230002458 - Randall Blvd - Immokalee Rd (PUDZ) Attachments: Checklist for PUDZ PUDA PUDR Application.pdf Thomas, I attached an outdated checklist form —please use the version attached. Thanks! From: LauraDeJohnVEN Sent: Monday, March 27, 2023 7:24 AM To: ThomasClarkeVEN <Thomas.Clarke@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Pre Application Meeting notes PL20230002458 - Randall Blvd - Immokalee Rd (PUDZ) Thomas, Attached is the PUDZ checklist. (The applicant submitted as a PUDR but this is a PUDZ) Here are zoning pre app notes for the referenced March 15 Pre app: to) tvjlp� / V 1W Site is zoned E-ST/W-3 and ST/W-4 Petitioner proposes rezone to CPUD for total of 125,000 square feet of C-3 uses including indoor air-conditioned self storage with companion GMPA (PL20230002460) Petitioner is in process of executing an agreement with Collier County to complete a land swap to relocate water management area from Parcel No. 37742880001 (Lot 36) to Parcel No. 37743960001 (Lot 52) with necessary conveyance easements. • Provide a copy of the agreement with submittal • Rezoning requires narratives explaining how the request meets applicable GMP policies and Rezone and PUD criteria per the LDC. Include analysis comparing proposed development standards and intensity with the development standards and intensities that apply in the surrounding areas to demonstrate compatibility and consistency with the existing land use pattern. • To address compatibility within the PUD, identify the specific uses allowed with C-3 that are anticipated on the site as permitted uses. • A PUD Master Plan is required, including contents outlined in the Administrative Code, section G.1. • If deviations from Admin Code or LDC requirements are proposed, provide justifications demonstrating such master plan elements may be waived without detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community (LDC section 10.02.13.A.3), and/or demonstrating that the deviation is "justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations" per 10.02.13.B.5.h. • Petitioner must conduct a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) prior to scheduling of public hearings before the Planning Commission & Board of County Commissioners. • In the application form where civic associations must be listed, and for purposes of NIM mailings, include Golden Gate Estates Civic Association Laura DeJohn, AICP Collier County Growth Management Department Zoning Services (Vendor) 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Desk: (239) 252-5587 aura.de1ohn@col1ieicou�ztvfl.�ov . Comprehensive Planning Pre-App Notes Randall Blvd/Immokalee Rd Subdistrict GMPA P L20230002460 —Kathy Eastley PUDZ PL20230002458 — Laura DeJohn Description: March 15, 2023 - 1:30 p.m. The applicant proposes to create a 10.44 acre subdistrict in the Golden Gate Area Master Plan to aHow 125,000 square feet of C-3 uses, some of which may include self -storage. The district is proposed to include three properties that front on Immokalee Rd west of the Randall Blvd intersection and the Corkscrew Canal. One of the properties is currently owned by Collier County and is under an agreement for trade or swap. The existing zoning is Estates (E), and the properties are currently vacant. The subject site has a Future Land Use designation of Estates, Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP), Rural Estates Sub -Element, Estates Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict. The Rural Estates Sub -element describes this area as appropriate for single-family residential development at a maximum density of one unit per 2.25 gross acres or legal non -conforming lot of record. Growth Management Plan Amendments require the applicant to consistency with the following policies: address and demonstrate • Please provide a needs analysis for the commercial square footage and mini -storage proposed, as well as an analysis of why this location is appropriate for the requested uses. Demonstrate the availability, or lack thereof, of existing properties that could meet the zoning allowances without the need for a GMPA. Include a narrative justifying the market area utilized for the study. The County has recently approved several GGAMP subdistricts and rezones in the immediate vicinity with commercial and residential entitlements. • The Randall Blvd/Immokalee Road Planning Study included these properties. The study results encourage mixed use rather than straight commercial uses. Please include an analysis of the proposal based upon this study. • Policy 5.6 states that "New development shall be compatible with, and complimentary to, the surrounding land uses..." Given the Residential Estates designation the applicant must demonstrate how this use is compatible/complimentary with the surrounding uses, particularly the residential uses to the south and west. o Please consider enhanced buffering as well as the standard 75-foot buffer requirement, of which no less than 50-feet must be retained native vegetation. o Provide information regarding mitigation measures proposed to minimize impacts from lighting, noise, glare, and odors associated with the commercial uses. o Provide line of sight renderings for all directions, particularly for abutting residential areas. Comprehensive Planning Pre-App Notes Randall Blvd/Immokalee Rd Subdistrict March 15, 2023 - 1:30 p.m. • Include discussion on how, if applicable, the development complies with GMPA Policies 7.1- 7.4. The Planning Study focused creating destinations that create a sense of place and the desire for pedestrian and bicycle interconnections in the study area. • List and address applicable provisions of Florida Statues 163.3187 and 163.3177 for amending the Growth Management Plan (GMP). A companion application proposed to rezone the site from Estates to PUD. General Information • Public Notice requirements in Subsection 10.03.06.E o Staff suggests communicating with neighbors regarding the proposal. • One neighborhood information meeting (NIM) is required at least 15 days prior to the advertised Planning Commission Hearing. o GMPA and PUDR can be combined in one NIM • Public Hearings o EAC, if required 0 one CCPC o Final Decision BCC following recommendations from EAC and CCPC ■ The PUDR petition decision pending decision for GIVIPA Contact information Kathy Eastley 239-252-2834 katherine.eastlevC�colliercountyfl.�ov ThomasuarkevItN From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: EastleyKatherine Wednesday, March 15, 2023 2:13 PM ThomasClarkeVEN SaboJames; LauraDeJohnVEN PL20230002460 GMPA Pre-app Notes PL20230002460 Randall-Immokalee Subdistric t GMPA Preapp notes.docx Good afternoon, Attached are notes for the GMPA portion of the pre -application meeting that was held this afternoon. Thank you, Kathy Eastley, AICP Planner II Comprehensive Planning CO er bounty Zoning Division Kathen ne. Eastley�a�col I iercou ntyfl. gov 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL 34101 Direct Phone: 239.252.2834 Under Florida Law, e-rnail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do i�ot send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Information contained in this email is subject to verification by the Zoning Manager and/or Planning Director; if this information is being used as a basis for the purchase/lease of a property or as a guide for the design of a project, it is recommended that a Zoning Verificatior� Letter or Zoning Certificate Application is submitted to zoning services. Applications for a Zoning Verification Letter can be found here: https://www.colliercountvfl.Rov/home/showdocument?id=69624 Zoning Certificate applications can be found here: https: www.colliercount) I.gov/your-government/divisions-f- r/operations-regulatory-management/zoning-or-land-use-application/zoning-other-land-use-applications . COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.coll iercountyfl.�ov 1 Meeting Notes 2$00 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE MAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 �239) 252-2400 �� w s �O ti�q.�' iy ti � - 1 � �� '�..y %�- i�,J��Q�t/ r ��-G /¢ �i�' �i i�? b �/� �'/ L Iy U � e S �ti� � P/3 Nc3"� � �.� s . Q ' V � �N ru �¢ �c.T � C... C�L�1 G w� Cam-- �¢-7l"��-G�, �J �rt� r�i t... � :� � � N � w� � �%'�-Ci� �Nt �y� � �y i /�-�, its � . C . �, � . C . � � Pam-- -- ,� `�.�,,� (J��Tv�, -- C o wZ'�-ter' l�c�t T� ��,�. �cs i �o w '� ,_ �-� ��� � Other required documentation for submittal knot listed on application): Disclaimer: Information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required data. Updated 1/12/2021 Page (3 of 5 i nomaSUarkevEN From: Sent: Subject: Thomas and Laura, SawyerMichael Wednesday, March 15, 2023 10:39 AM ThomasClarkeVEN; LauraDeJohnVEN Randall Blvd and Immokalee Pre App Please provide the following notes to the agent regarding the self -storage use requests, and check the applicable boxes for TIS and methodology. Transportation Planning: Methodology meeting by ZOOM, please request a meeting by email when your team is ready; we recommend having both transportation and planning members attend. The meeting fee needs to be noted on the TIS cover sheet to be collected at the time of GMPA and PUD submittal. Due to the project location, additional county transportation staff members will need to attend the Methodology to address current roadway improvements in this area, access, current parcel ownership/land swap process, and comments that may occur as part of the discussion. Address all transportation elements of the GMP. Provide both ITE and SIC use codes in the TIS. Provide trip limit based on TIS using standard language: "The maximum total daily trip generation for the PUD shall not exceed two-way PM peak hour net trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval." Also, provide interconnection commitment using standard language. Respectfully, Michael �a�ti;�ei� Project Manager II Transportation Management Services Department Transpol-tation Planning 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Suite 103 Naples, Florida 34104 239-252-2926 michael.sawve collercou»tyfl.Qov Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 Transportation Planning and PUD Monitoring Pre-App Notes Developer Commitments: Transportation Planning " The maximum total daily trip generation for the PUD shall not exceed two-way PM peak hour net trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SOFA or subdivision plat approval." Use Codes Provide both ITE and SIC use codes in the TIS. PUD Monitoring "One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close- out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this CPUD approval, the Managing Entity is the Insert Company Name Here. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and coznmittnents to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the CPUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed -out, then the Managing Entity is no Longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments." Miscellaneous "Pursuant to Section 125.022(5) F.S., issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement development." of the ThomasClarkeVEN From: Beard Laurie Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2023 1:54 PM To: ThomasClarkeVEN Subject: Pre -Application Meeting PL20230002458 -Randall Blvd - Immokalee Road (PUDR) Attachments: Transportation-PUD monitoring pre app handout 2020.docx PUD Monitoring pre-app notes attached. Laurie Beard Project Manager Please note new address: PUD Monitoring, GMD 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Laurie. BeardC�CollierCou Phone: (239)-252-5782 �t� �.,�► 1►'�'PRDUDLY SEEMI��'J V�'C4LLIsR� NTY'V FL.aov Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. if you do not �Nar�t your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic ►mail to this entity. instead, contact this ofi�ice by telephone or in ���riting. M� ThomasClarkeVEN From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: BrownCraig Wednesday, March 15, 2023 2:01 PM ThomasClarkeVEN P�� z--. RE: Zoning Pre-App Meeting for Randall Blvd - Immokalee Road GP-.4�� PL20230002458 & Randall Blvd-�n�c�k lee Road Subdistrict(GMPA) - PL2023000Z460 PUDZ-checklist FOR REVIEWERS 2-2017.doc; Environmental data Checklist updated December 2016.doc Thomas here are my note for this one Thanks. l . Please provide a current Listed species survey, which should include listed plants for the subject property. Provide supporting exhibits (i.e. Panther zones ect.) be sure to include Black Bear and Florida Bonneted Batas part of the evaluation. Provide a wildlife survey for the nests of bald eagle and for listed species known to inhabit biological communities similar to those existing on site. The survey shall be conducted in accordance with the guidelines or recommendations of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Provide a survey for listed plants identified in 3.04.03. 2. Provide calculations on site plan showing the appropriate acreage of native vegetation to be retained, the max. amount and ratios permitted to be created on -site or mitigated off -site. Exclude vegetation located within utility and drainage easements from the preserve calculations (LDC 3.05.07.B-D; 3.05.07.F; 3.05.07.H.1.d-e). (15 % of native vegetation is required for preservation.) Label the Master plan with a note that the preservation is to be addressed off -site and provide the calculation in the packet submitted. 3. Please address how the proposed project is consistent with Conservation Coastal Management Element (CCME) Policy 6.1 and Objective 7.1. THIS needs to be address for both the GMPA/PUD 4. Explain how the project meets or exceeds the native vegetation requirements and minimizes impacts to listed species as required in the CCME. (The preservation requirement is 15% of the native vegetation existing onsite). 5. Indicate how the project design minimizes impacts to listed species. Describe the measures that are proposed as mitigation for impacts to listed species. (If found onsite}. 6. Demonstrate that the design of the proposed stormwater management system and analysis of water quality and quantity impacts fully incorporate the requirements of the Watershed Management regulations of 3.07.00. 7. Please provide brief explanation to address the area of the subject property that has been cleared of vegetation, provide supporting documents( i.e. permits or historic aerials ect). 8. Identify any Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones (WRM-ST) within the project area and provide an analysis for how the project design avoids the most intensive land uses within the most sensitive WRM- STs and will comply with the WRM-ST pursuant to 3.06.00. Include the location of the Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones on the SDP or final plat construction plans. For land use applications such as standard and PUD rezones and CUs, provide a separate site plan or zoning map with the project boundary and Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones identified. Environmental Data Fee: $2500.00 Craig Brawn Environmental Supervisor Development Review Divisi0i� (239) 252-2548. Environmental P Project Name Z-PUDA Checklist (non-RFMU) 1. Is the project is in compliance with the ovel•lays, districts and/or zoning on the subject site and/or the surrounding properties? (CON, ST, PUD, RLSA, RFMU, etc.) (LDC 2.03.05-2.03.08; 4.08.00) Not in CV Library 2. Submit a current aerial photograph (available from the Property Appraiser's office) and clearly delineate the subject site boundary lines. If the site is vegetated, provide FLUCFCS overlay and vegetation inventory identifying upland, wetland and exotic vegetation (Admin. Code Ch. 3 G.1. Application Contents #24). FLUCFCS Overlay -P627 3. Clearly identify the location of all preserves and label each as "Preserve" on all plans. (LDC 3.05.07.H.1). Preserve Label- P546 4. Provide calculations on site plan showing the appropriate acreage of native vegetation to be retained, the max. amount and ratios permitted to be created on -site or mitigated off -site. Exclude vegetation located within utility and drainage easements from the preserve calculations (LDC 3.05.07.B-D; 3.05.07.F; 3.05.07.H.1.d-e). Preserve Calculation - P547 5. Created and retained preserve areas shall meet the minimum width requirements per LDC 3.05.07.H.1.b. Preserve Width - P603 6. Retained preservation areas shall be selected based on the criteria defined in LDC 3.05.07.A.3, include a113 strata, be in the largest contiguous area possible and shall be interconnected within the site and to adjoining off -site preservation areas or wildlife corridors. (LDC 3.05.07.A.1-4) Preserve Selection- P550 7. Principle structures shall be located a minimum of 25' from the boundary of the preserve boundary. No accessory structures and other site alterations, fill placement, grading, plant alteration or removal, or similar activity shall be permitted within 10' of the boundary unless it can be shown that it will not affect the integrity of the preserve (i.e. stem wall or berm around wetland preserve). Provide cross -sections for each preserve boundary identifying all site alterations within 25' . (LDC 3.05.07.H.3; 6.01.02.C.) Preserve Setback —New 8. Wildlife survey required for sites where an E1S is not required, when so warranted. (LDC 10.02.02.A.2. fl Listed Species - P522 9. Provide Environmental Data identifying author• credentials, consistency determination with the GMPs, off -site preserves, seasonal and historic high water levels, and analysis of water quality. For land previously used for farm fields or golf course, provide soil sampling/groundwater monitoring reports identifying any site contamination. (LDC 3.08.00) Environmental Data Required — P 522 10. PUD Document and Master Plan shall state the minimum acreage required to be preserved. (LDC 10.02.13.A.2) Master Plan Contents-P626 11. If the PUD includes a Preserve Tract section UP FOR DISCUSSION —DISCUSS WITH CAO When listing preserve uses, the following is suggested: A. Principal Use: Preserve; B. Accessory Uses: All other uses (list as applicable or refer to the LDC —see 1-3 below as typical uses listed by agents) (ensure the text states "subject to LDC section related to Allowable uses witlritz County required preserves" Alternate format: A. Uses subject to LDC section Allowable uses within County required preserves: l . Nature trails that do not reduce the amount of required preserve. 2. Passive Recreation uses, as per LDC requirements. 3. Stonnwater only when in accordance with the LDC. PUD Commitments and Site Plan notes Where preserves occur adjacent to development off site and will be used in lieu of landscape buffers, include the following condition in the environmental commitments section of the PUD document or master plan: Preserves may be used to satisfy the landscape buffer requirements after exotic vegetation removal in accordance with LDC sections 4.06.02 and 4.06.05.E. L Supplemental plantings with native plant materials shall be in accordance with LDC section 3.05.07. 12. PUD Document shall identify any listed species found on site and/or describe any unique vegetative features that will be preserved on the site. (LDC ] 0.02.13.A.2.) Unique Features- P628 Example: A management plan for the entire project shall be submitted in accordance with the requirements and procedures of the LDC for listed species including but not limited to Black Bear, Gopher Tortoise and listed birds. The management plan shall be submitted prior to development of the first phase of the project. 13. Review cross -sections if provided; they are not required wi Is there any fill proposed in the preserve? Additional Comments: th the PUD. However, sometimes they are provided. Project Name Environmental Data Checklist ZL The Environmental Data requirements can be found in LDC Section 3.08.00 l . P�•ovide the EIS fee if PUD or CU. 2. WHO AND V'VHA,T COMPANY PREPARED THE ENVIRONMENTAL DATA REPORT? Preparation of Environmental Data. Environmental Data Submittal Requirements shall be prepared by an individual with academic credentials and experience in the area of environmental sciences or natural resource management. Academic credentials and experience shall be a bachelor's or higher degree in one of the biological sciences with at least two years of ecological or biological professional experience in the State of Florida. Please include revision dates on resubmittals. 3. Identify on a current aerial, the location and acreage of all SFWMD jurisdictional wetlands accol-ding to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS) and include this information on the SDP or final plat construction plans. Wetlands must be verified by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) or Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) prior to SDP or final plat construction plans approval. For sites in the RFMU district, provide an assessment in accordance with 3.05.07 F and identify on the FLUCFCS map the location of all high quality wetlands (wetlands having functionality scores of at least 0.65 WRAP or 0.7 UMAM) and their location within the proposed development plan. Sites with high quality wetlands must have their functionality scores verified by the SFWMD or DEP prior to first development order approval. Where functionality scores have not been verified by either the SFWMD or DEP, scores must be reviewed and accepted by County staff, consistent with State regulation. 4. SDP o1- final plat construction plans with impacts to five (5) or more acres of wetlands shall provide an analysis of potential water quality impacts of the project by evaluating water quality loadings expected from the project (post development conditions considering the proposed land uses and stormwater management controls) compared with water quality loadings of the project area as it exists in its pre -development conditions. The analysis shall be performed using methodologies approved by Federal and State water quality agencies, and must demonstrate no increase in nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorous) loadings in the post development scenario. 5. Where treated stormwater is allowed to be directed into preserves, show how the criteria in 3.05.07 H have been met. 6. Where native vegetation is retained on site, provide a topographic map to a half foot and, where possible, provide elevations within each of the FLUCFCS Codes identified on site. For SDP or final plat construction plans, include this information on the site plans. 7. Provide a wildlife survey for the nests of bald eagle and for listed species known to inhabit biological communities similar to those existing on site. The survey shall be conducted in accordance with the guidelines or recommendations of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Survey times may be reduced or waived where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low, as determined by the FFWCC and USFWS. Where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low, the survey time may be reduced or waived by the County Manager or designee, when the project is not reviewed or technical assistance not provided by the FFWCC and USFWS. Additional survey time may be required if listed species are discovered 8. Provide a survey for listed plants identified in 3.04.03 9. Wildlife habitat management and monitoring plans in accordance with 3.04.00 shall be required where listed species are utilizing the site or where wildlife habitat management and monitoring plans are required by the FFWCC or USFWS. These plans shall describe now the project directs incompatible land uses away from listed species and their habitats. Identify the location of listed species nests, burrows, dens, foraging areas, and the ,r�� te� 3. �• �, location of any bald eagle nests or nest protection zones on the native vegetation aerial with FLUCFCS overlay for the site. Wildlife habitat management plans shall be included on the SDP or final plat construction plans. Bald eagle management plans are required for sites containing bald eagle nests or nest protection zones, copies of which shall be included on the SDP or final plat construction plans. 10. For sites or portions of sites cleared of native vegetation or in agricultural Meratio provide documentation that the parcels) were issued a permit to be cleared and are in compliance with the 25 year rezone limitation pursuant to section 10.02.06. For sites permitted to be cleared prior to July 2003, provide documentation that the parcels) are in compliance with the 10 year rezone limitation previously identified in the GMP. Criteria defining native vegetation and determining the legality, process and criteria for clearing are found in 3.05.05, 3.05.07 and 100020060 11. Identify on a current aerial the acreage, location and community types of all upland and wetland habitats on the project site, according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS), and provide a legend for each of the FLUCFCS Codes identified. Aerials and overlay information must be legible at the scale provided. Provide calculations for the acreage of native vegetation required to be retained on -site. Include the above referenced calculations and aerials on the SDP or final plat construction plans. In a separate report, demonstrate how the preserve selection criteria pursuant to 3.05.07 have been met. Where applicable, include in this report an aerial showing the project boundaries along with any undeveloped land, preserves, natural flowways or other natural land features, located on abutting properties. 12. Include on a separate site plan, the project boundary and the land use designations and overlays for the RLSA, RFMU, ST and ACSC-ST districts. Include this information on the SDP or final plat construction plans. 13. Where off -site preservation of native vegetation is proposed in lieu of on -site, demonstrate that the criteria in section 3.05.07 have been met and provide a note on the SDP or final plat construction plans indicating the type ion) identified to satisfy the requirement. Include on the SDP or of donation (monetary payment or land donat final plat construction plans, a location map(s) and property identification number(s) of the off -site parcel(s) if off -site donation of land is to occur. 14. Provide the results of any Environmental Assessments and/or Audits of the property, along with a narrative of the measures needed to remediate if required by FDEP. 15. Soil and/or ground water sampling shall be required at the time of first development order submittal for sites that occupy farm fields (crop fields, cattle dipping ponds, chemical mixing areas), golf courses, landfill or junkyards or for sites where hazardous products exceeding 250 gallons of liquid or 1,000 pounds of solids were stored or processed or where hazardous wastes in excess of 220 pounds per month or 110 gallons at any point in time were generated or stored. The amount of sampling and testing shall be determined by a registered professional with experience in the field of Environmental Site Assessment and shall at a minimum test for organochlorine pesticides (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 8081) and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) 8 metals using Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) soil sampling Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) FS 3000, in areas suspected of being used for mixing and at discharge point of water if no points of contamination are obvious. Include a management system. Sampling should occur randomly background soil analysis from an undeveloped location hydraulically upgradient of the potentially contaminated site. Soil sampling should occur just below the root zone, about 6 to 12 inches below ground surface or as otherwise agreed upon with the registered professional with experience in the field of Environmental Site Assessment. Include in or with the Environmental Site Assessment, the acceptable State and Federal pollutant levels for the types of contamination found on site and indicate in the Assessment, when the contaminants are over these levels. If this analysis has been done as part of an Environmental Audit then the report shall be submitted. The County shall coordinate with the FDEP where contamination exceeding applicable FDEP standards is identified on site or where an Environmental Audit or Environmental Assessment has been submitted. 16. Shoreline development must provide an analysis demonstrating that the project will remain fully functional for its intended use after asix-inch rise in sea level. 17. Provide justification for deviations from e�ivironmental LDC provisions pursuant to GMP COME Policy 6.1.1 (13), if requested. 18. Where applicable, provide evidence of the issuance of all applicable federal aYld/or state oil and gas permits for proposed oil and gas activities in Collier County. Include all state permits that comply with the requirements of Chapter 62C-25 through 62C-3 0, F.A.C., as those rules existed on January 13, 2005. 19. Identify any Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones (WRM-ST) withili the project area and provide an analysis fol• how the project design avoids the most intensive land uses within the most sensitive WRM-STs and will comply with the WRM-ST pursuant to 3.06.00. Include t11e location of the Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones on the SDP or final plat constl•uction plans. For land use applications such as standard and PUD rezones and CUs, provide a separate site plan or zoning map with the project boundary and Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones identified. 20. Demonstrate that the design of the proposed stormwater management system and analysis of water quality and quantity impacts fully incorporate the requireme�its of the Watershed Management regulations of 3.07.00. 21. For sites located in the Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern -Special Treatment overlay district (ACSC- ST), show how the project is consistent with the development standards and regulations in 4.02.14. 22. For multi -slip docking facilities with ten slips or more, and for all ma1•ina facilities, show how the project is consistent with 5.05.02. Refer to the Manatee Protection Plan for site specific requirements of the Manatee Protection Plan not included in 5.05.02. 23. For development orders within RFMU sending lands, show how the project is consistent with each of the applicable Objectives and Policies of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the GMP. 24. The County Manager or designee may require additional data or information necessary to evaluate the project's compliance with LDC and GMP requirements. (LDC 10.02.02.A3 fl The following to be determined at preapplication meeting: (Choose those that apply) a. Provide overall description of project with respect to environmental and water management issues. b. Explain how project is consistent with each of the applicable objectives and policies in the CCME of t11e GMP. c. Explain how the project meets or exceeds the native vegetation preservation requirement in the CCME and LDC. d. Indicate wetlands to be impacted and the effects of the impact to their functions and haw the project's design compensates for wetland unpacts. e. Indicate how the project design minimizes impacts to listed species. Describe the measures that are proposed as mitigation for impacts to listed species. 25. PUD zoning and CU petitions. For PUD rezones and CU petitions, applicants shall collate and package applicable Environmental Data Submittal Requirements into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) document, prior to public hearings and after all applicable staff reviews are complete. Copies of the EIS shall be provided to the County Manager or designee prior to public hearings. 26. Is EAC Review (by CCPC) required? 27. PUD master plan or PPL/SDP site plan notes: Where preserves occur adjacent to development off site and will be used in lieu of landscape buffers, include the following condition in the environmental commitments section of the PUD document. Preserves may be used to satisfy the landscape buffer reguiremts after exotic vegetatio�i removal in accordance with LDC sections 4.06.02 and 4.06.05.E.1. Supplemental plantings with native plant materials shall be in accordance with LDC section 3.05.07. 28. Additional comments 29. Stipulations for approval (Conditions) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercountvfl.gov llr er County _.. 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORI DA 34104 (239) 252-2400 Zoning Pre-Ap�alicatic�n meeting Sign -In Sheet PL# 20230002458 (PUDZ) 202300024 60 �( Collier County Contact Information: GMPA Name Review Discipline Phone Email ❑ ❑ John Kelly Zoning Senior Planner 252-5719 john.kelly@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Richard Henderlong Zoning -Planner III 252-2464 richard.henderlong@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Ray Bellows Zoning &Planning Manager 252-2463 raymond.bellows@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Mike Bosi Zoning &Planning Director 252-1061 Michael.Bosi@colliercountyfl.gov Nancy Gundlach, AICP Zoning —Planner Ill 252-2484 nancy.gundlach@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Eric Ortman Zoning —Planner III 252-1032 Eric.Ortman@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Sean Sammon Zoning —Planner III 252-8422 Sean.sammon@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Tim Finn, AICP Zoning -Planner III 252-4312 timothy.finn@colliercountyfl.gov Thomas Clarke Zoning -Operations Analyst 252-2584 Thomas.clarke@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Anthony Stoltz Utility Planning -Supervisor 252-5835 Anthony.stoltz@colliercountyfl.gov Drew Cody Utility Planning —Project Mgr III 252-2917 Drew.cody@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Brandi Pollard Utility Impact fees 252-6237 brandi.pollard@colliercountyfl.gov L�� Shon Fandrich Utilities -Project Mgt -Supervisor 252-8835 Shon.fandrich@colliercountyfl.gov U Steve Baluch Transportation Planning 252-2361 Stephen.baluch@colliercountyfl.gov �� Michael Sawyer Transportation Planning 252-2926 michael.sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov Michael Gibbons Structural/Residential Plan Review 252-2426 michael.gibbons@colliercountyfl.gov ��`� Richard Orth Stormwater Planning 252-5092 richard.orth@colliercountyfl.gov � Alicia Humphries Right-Of-'JVay Permitting 252-2326 alicia.humphries@colliercountyfl.gov I�Laurie Beard PUD Monitoring -Project Mgr II 252-5782 laurie.beard@colliercountyfl.gov �� Sean Lintz North Collier Fire-Batallion Chief 597-9227 Blintz@northcollierfire.com �_� Maggie Acevedo North Collier Fire 252-2309 macevedo@northcollierfire.com I�! Daniel Zunzunegui North Collier Fire 252-2310 Daniel.Zunzunegui@colliercountyfl.gov � -� Linda Simmons North Collier Fire 252-2311 Linda.Simmons@colliercountyfl.gov �_l Shar A.Beddow MSM/Deputy Fire Marshal - Greater Naples Fire 241-1422 sbeddow@gnfire.org Heidi Ashton Cicko Managing Asst. County Attorney 252-8773 heidi.ashton@colliercountyfl.gov C_ Diane Lynch Management Analyst I 252-4283 diane.lynch@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Mark Templeton Landscape Review 252-2475 mark.templeton@colliercountyfl.gov �___� Gino Santabarbara Impact Fees —Planner III 252-2925 Gino.santabarbara@colliercountyfl.gov Updated 03/14/2023 Page � 4 of 5 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www. co I l i e rco u ntyf I .�ov Co[l�ie-� County 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORI DA 34104 �239} 252-2400 =i Thomas Mastroberto Greater Naples Fire —Site Plans Reviewer III 252-7348 thomas.mastroberto@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Sue Faulkner GMP-Comp Planning -Planner III 252-5715 sue.faulkner@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Parker Klopf GMP—Comp Planning — Plannerll 252-2471 Parker.klopf@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Rachel Hansen GMP—Comp Planning —Planner III 252-1142 Rachel.hansen@colliercountyfl.gov Kathy Eastley GMP-Comp Planning -Planner III 252-2834 Kathy Eastley@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ James Sabo, AICP GMP, Comp Planning Manager 252-2708 james.sabo@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Alexandra Mitchel Environmental Specialist 252-2907 Alexandra.Mitchel@colliercountyfl.gov (❑ David Roe Environmental Specialist 252-2915 David.Roe@colliercountyfl.gov �d Craig Brown Environmental Review Supervisor 252-2548 craig.brown@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Sarah Harrington Environmental Review Manager 252-4211 Sarah.Harrington@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ John Houldsworth Engineering Subdivision 252-5757 John.houldsworth@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jocelyn Nageon De Lestang, P.E. Engineering Stormwater 252-2434 Jocelyn.NageondeLestang@colliercountyfl.gov Jack McKenna, P.E. Engineering Services 252-2911 jack.mckenna@colliercountyfl.gov Matt McLean, P.E. Division Director - IF, CPP & PM 252-8279 matthew.mclean@colliercountyfl.gov Cormac Giblin, AICP Director— Econ. Dev. &Housing 252-2460 Cormac.giblin@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jamie Cook Development Review Director 252-6290 Jaime.cook@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Christine Willoughby Development Review -Zoning 252-5748 Christine.willoughby@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Brett Rosenblum-P.E Dev. Review -Supervisor Proj. Mgt 252-2905 brett.rosenblum@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Michele Mosca, AICP Community Develop. —Planner III 252-2466 michele.mosca@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Connie Thomas Client Services Supervisor 252-6369 Consuela.thomas@colliercountyfl.gov Renald Paul Client Services 252-2443 Renald.paul@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Lisa Blacklidge Building Review 252-2758 Lisa.blacklidge@colliercountyfl.gov Derek Perry Assistant County Attorney 252-8066 Derek.perry@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Peter Shawinsky Architectural Review 252-8523 peter.shawinsky@colliercountyfl.gov Additional Attendee Contact Information: Name Representing Phone Email rk u t h �.�, ..� oC � T ��S Z 3 � s"� - � b r �,,� �l�v rt� -c.�.1� e `— Updated 03/14/2023 Page � 5 of 5 Randall Bivd-Immokalee Rd.(PUDR) PL20230002458 & GMPA) PL20230002460 — Zoom March 15, 1:30PM �=�., F i r� �l L� E � � r-ti r i l � a rat TC MS DC thC�r11�S r(�rk� i;H��t, t���si Ell�ri �un�m�r�, P•.•ii�h�l Saa�l�h E'�c� l � � r-t P•��1 r.r l l � � r-� �L r� i � E r-c� �,�•, r� Lour aC?� Ir�(�r�••a'Er4�! ^r����J F'���r- C� � r� �: C--�. F� � rr•. �_ �� �_I r�t-�,� ^.ttc� r-r� e ����' � ��f i r� 1� ��r�r��i►� ��h��t�ir� K�th�rir��.E � ;t[�..� r�J �� rr�� � r� Try F� i (� c� r {� ���r-ah,H�rrin�tc�r� :�. ��� �=r: «: ��� �=r: i�r: MS DC thC�r11�S r(�rk� i;H��t, t���si Ell�ri �un�m�r�, P•.•ii�h�l Saa�l�h E'�c� l � � r-t P•��1 r.r l l � � r-� �L r� i � E r-c� �,�•, r� Lour aC?� Ir�(�r�••a'Er4�! ^r����J F'���r- C� � r� �: C--�. F� � rr•. �_ �� �_I r�t-�,� ^.ttc� r-r� e ����' � ��f i r� 1� ��r�r��i►� ��h��t�ir� K�th�rir��.E � ;t[�..� r�J �� rr�� � r� Try F� i (� c� r {� ���r-ah,H�rrin�tc�r� :�. ��� �=r: «: ��� �=r: i�r: . �. Applicant/Agent may also send site plans or conceptual plans for review in advance if desired. Planner -Laura DeJohn PL20230002460 —Randall Blvd.-Immokalee Rd. Subdistrict (GMPA� Planner -Kathy Eastle Assigned Ops Staff: Thomas Clarke STAFF FORM FOR SUPPLEMENTAL PRE -APPLICATION MEETING INFORMATION • Name and Number of who submitted pre-app request Stephanie Karol —Hole Montes, Inc. 239-254-2018 stephaniekarol� hmen�.com • Agent to list for PL# gob Mulhere, President— HOIe Montes, Inc. • Owner of property fall owners for all parcels) - GM Advisors LLC - Collier Cnty Transportation Right-of-way Confirm Purpose of Pre-App: This is a PUD Rezone (PUDR) to rezone approx. 10.44 acres from E states (E) to CPUD to permit a maximum 125,000 square feet of C-3 uses and indoor air-conditioned self - storage. A companion SSGMPA to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan is proposed to allow for the commercial uses. Please list the density request of the project if applicable and number of homes/units/offices/docks tany that aPplY Details about Project: See Above REQUIRED Supplemental Information provided by: Name: Title: Email: Phone: Cancellation/Reschedule Requests: Contact Connie Thomas- Supervisor —Permitting Consuela.tholmas@colliercountyfl.gov -Phone: 239-252-2473 Created April 5, 2017 Location: K:\CDES Planning Services\Current\Zoning Staff Information Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1036 � Email: GMDClientservices@colliercountyfl.gov www.col liercountyfl.gov Final Submittal Requirement Checklist far: ❑✓ PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G.1 of the Administrative Cade ❑ Amendment to PUD- Ch. 3 G.2 of the Administrative Code ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone- Ch. � G.1 �f the Administrative Code The following submittal requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with an up-to-date application. Please upload the submittal items with cover sheets attached to each section via the GMD Portal. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted, or processed. View sample PUD document. REQUIREMENTS RE UIRED � NOT REQUIRED Cover Letter with narrative statement including a detailed description of why amendment is necessary Completed application with required attachments (download latest version) ✓ I Pre -application meeting notes � Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized ✓ Property Ownership Disclosure Form I ✓ Notarized and completed Covenant of Unified Control ✓ I Completed Addressing Checklist ✓ I Warranty Deeds) ✓ List identifying owner and all parties of corporation ✓ Signed and sealed Boundary Survey ✓ Architectural rendering of proposed structures ✓ Current aerial photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. � ❑ Statement of utility provisions ✓ Environmental data requirements pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact Statement LEIS) packet at time of public hearings. Coordinate with project planner at time of public hearings. � ❑ Listed or protected species survey, less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys. �-� L�J ❑ Traffic Impact Study (TIS) �s; �GG�¢e.%e � �iT P�G,t�T1d S�.c�3��-TA��.. '� Historical Survey ✓ School Impact Analysis Application, if applicable ✓ Electronic copy of all required documents ✓ Completed Exhibits A-F (see below for additional information)+ ✓ List of requested deviations from the LDC with justification for each (this document is separate from Exhibit E) � ❑ ❑ *Checklist continues on next page 07/2022 Page 9 of 11 Go -�e� County .� �`�-. tom` �' ;��"w'`-.�_,s-�.:�- r= t�;.y.V Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1036 � Email: GMDCIientServices@colliercountyfl.gov www.col I i ercou ntyfl.gov Revised Conceptual Master Site Plan 24" x 36"and one (1) 8 %" x 11" copy ✓ Original PUD document/ordinance, and Master Plan 24" x 36" —Only if Amending � the PUD ❑ ❑ Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru &underlined ✓ Copy of Official Interpretation and/or Zoning Verification � L✓ +The following exhibits are to be completed on a separate document and attached to the application packet: • Exhibit A: List of Permitted Uses • Exhibit B: Development Standards • Exhibit C: Master Plan- See Chapter 3 G.1 of the Administrative Code • Exhibit D: Legal Description • Exhibit E: List of Requested LDC Deviations and justification for each • Exhibit F: List of Development Commitments If located in RFMU Rural Fringe Mixed Use Receivin Land Areas Pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08.A.2.a.2.(b.)i.c., the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239-690-3500 for information regarding "Wildfire Mitigation &Prevention Plan." PLANNERS —INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: ❑ School District (Residential Components) Conservancy of SWFL ❑ ✓ Utilities Engineering Parks and Recreatiol�Director Emergency Management Immokalee Water/Sewer District Other: City of Naples Planning Director Other: City of Naples Utilities FEE REQUIREMENTS ❑✓ Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 ❑✓ PUD Rezone: $10,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone: $8,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre ❑ PUD Amendment: $6,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre Comprehensive Planning ❑ Consistency Review: $2,250.00 ---� Sa.A G��� F�&� ��-ZvZ3 -1'�6n Environmental Data Requirements -EIS Packet (submittal determined at pre -application meeting): $2,500.00 � ] Listed or Protected Species Review (when an EIS is not required): $1,000.00 Cl - �,w,� � �►�;L (sue ,���-�s) Transportation Review Fees._..-� �(t`� 7` � Y • Methodology Review: $500.00 (Methodology by Email to Staff) *Additional fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting. • Minor Study Review: $750.00 • Major Study Review $1,500.00 ❑✓ Fire Planning Review Fee: ($150 PUDZ) ($125 PUDA, PUDR) 07/2022 Page 10 of 11 CoI[ier Couvity ., Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1036 � Email: GMDCIientServices@colliercountyfl.gov www.colliercountyfl.gov [✓ Estimated Legal Advertising fee: CCPC: $1,125.00 • BCC: $500.00 �]✓ If applicable, an additional fee for Property Owner Notifications will be billed to the applicant after Hearing Examiner hearing date. (Variable) School Concurrenc Fee if a licable: Y pp • Mitigation Fees, if application, to be determined by the School District in coordination with the County All fees are collected at the time of application. Property Notification Letters, if required by The Land Development Code, will be invoiced after the petition is heard by the Board of County Commissioners. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, 1 attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. 1 understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. *Additional fee for the 5th and subsequent re -submittal will be accessed at 20°° of the original fee. *The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Community Development Department � GMD Portal: https://cvportal.col liercountyfl.gov/cityviewweb Questions? Email: GMDclientservices@colliercountyfl.gov Signature of Petitioner or Agent Date Printed named of signing party 07/2022 Page 11 of 11 Al I [IPA] I I j, Iv1iCHEL M. SAADEH (print name), as MUM applicable) of cIH ADVISORS, u.c (title, if LL (company, If ap licable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owned applicant contract purchaser and that. 1. I have full aufihority to secure the approvals} requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4-. The , property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. �. Well authorize RCSERTJ, MULHERE, FA1GP, PRESICEO & JEREMIE CHASTAIN, AICP, SR. PLANNER to act as our/mv res re entative in any matters regarding this petition including i through 2 above. `t�otes: If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the core. Ares. or v. pres. ® If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.LeC. ) or Limited Company (L. C.), then the documents should typi Ily be signed by the Company's "Managing Member.' If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. p /f the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be Identified as the eneral partner" of the named partnership. g if the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name a /n each instance, first determine the applicant's status a individual, carp orate, tr�rst artnershi and , p p, then use the appropr7ate format for that ownership. 3TATE OF FLORIDA OUNTY OFCOLLIER Such person(s) Notary Public must check applicable box: re personaNy known to me Has produced a current drivers license Has produced as identification. Notary Signature: and .the words was trustee" Notary Public. State Of � Jo�ida Commissorl.No,, HN 339768 My +�omrnSsion Expies: 211712027 � 1 1' � 1 � 1 1 Wer County Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 2524036 ( Email: GMDClientServices@colliercountyfl.gov i www.collercountyfl.gov GM Advisors,LLC This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: Name and Address % of Ownership N/A b. If the property is owned Lot a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage Of stock owned by each: Name and Address % of Ownership N/A c. If the property is in the percentage of interest: 01/2023 name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the Name and Address % of Ownership N/A Page 1 of 3 d �//I��■.� County Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 2524036 Email: GMDClientServices@colliercountyfl.gov i www.collercountyf I.gov d. If the property is in the name Of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners: Name and Address % of Ownership GM Advisors, LLC 434 Terracina Court, Naples, FL 34119 Michel M. Saadeh, MGR 51 % George Chami, Authorized Member 49% e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners: f. Name and Address % of Ownership N/A Date of Contract: If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, Or trust: Name and Address N/A g. Date subject property acquired 1 /17/20 & 4/30/20 ❑ Leased: Term of lease years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: 01/2023 Page 2 of 3 entDevelopment Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 # - w • Llali Www.collierc* ■ . date Option terminates: or nticipated closing date. ntsforpete on types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whetherIts A LK� dEcepleti without this form. tequirem R Company other mmediately if such change occurs prior to the. petition's final public hearing, be disclosed to Collier County As tfie auth©rued agent,/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the inform�rtian indicated on - �ncluded in this submittal package, I understand that failure to include a this checklist 13 all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. 0 *m . INSTR 6391015 OR 6237 PG 2674 RECORDED 4/18/2023 2:24 PM PAGES 3 CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT AND COMPTROLLER, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA REC $27.00 r�Ts entered into Advisors, LP "Developer") 1 (herein collect' SECOND AMENDMENT TU LAND EXCHANGE �,GREEMENT GNi AD'�ISORS, LLC 1D ,, (hereinafter referred to as the "Amendment") is made and of Aor 1 2023 (the "Effective Date"), by and among GM y Florida firnifted liability company (hereinafter referred to as the :Vier County, Florida, a political subdivision of the State of Florida "County"), each individually referred to as the "Party" and e 'Parties." WHEREAS, the pales e,e 2021 (hereinafter referred to athe,.'i, Page 1878 in the Collier Courity�.c pECITALS: d into a Land Exchange agreement"), a copy of 3 is; and F WHEREAS, the parties dMtrecf ;, Into the • Agreement dated April 2, 2022, a cp - 4hich is Collier County Records; and `. WHEREAS, the parties wish t Agreement as set forth below; and WHEREAS, the Collier County amendment is in the best interest of tr Agreement dated November 9, which is recorded at OR 6045, First Amendment to Land Exchange recorded at OR 6114, Page 3144 in the set forth in paragraph 4 of the oners hereby finds that this �� i i 1tiaA7iJl'.1 i.i NU W 9 THEREFCJRE, in consideration of Ten DolMrs Q.00) and other good and valuable consideration exchanged amongst the parties, and in csid'dration of the covenants contained herein, the parties agree as follows: f:J 1. All of the above RECITALS are true and correct and'�#�P:J��Oaereby expressly :: ncorporated herein by reference as if set faith fully below,:x 2. Paragraph 4 of the Agreement is hereby amended as follows: Schedule. Design ofthe New Improvements s�-1-be has been completed r Vistric-t-Indi'vi , • En-vir, • /Resource ,ermit No., OR 6237 PG 2675 n of the New Improvements shall Comm Ct?1110tA "%0 &0 2024 and sly mutually agreed upon by the patties. Ce h3 rst 28, Z02�t) #tee unless otherwise 3. The ounty Manager may further extend the Agreement by an additional 90 days without the oard approval. Additional extensions of time will require Board approval. 4. Exec � ._as6fidtonditions ressly provided herein, the Agreement remains in full force and effect according to the teecontained therein. If there is a conflict between the terms of this Amendment and:a � eement, the terms of this Amendment shall prevail, k•i ✓. lE IN WITNESS WHE `KbF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their appropriate officials as .t f rtlit-,date first above written, . ;r AS TO COUNTY: I. •• P\L'•t4. A`I`7['EST. - • ,0 , HO RD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS •+Y, Crystal K: ���rkof Courts C' . `° ER COUNTY, FLORIDA 04 B , , y. . rA � t as � ffaij, •nli'S OAr►�f tirn nw11i ,`' 4 , . Elie, As TO DEVEL6 O- Ri�l��hstro, Chairman GM ADVISORS,I Si ed, sealed and delivered By: i e pre ence of: Name: , , /1 Title; Printed Name Signature Printed Name orida limited liability company *** OR 6237 PG 2676 *** STATE OF FLORiDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing ins.xrument was acknowledged before me this "F�c day of ate. 0 - c� t :: �L�-- -, as..�t.,,- of GM Advisors, LLC a Florida limited liabi'�i `cAiIi nul ny who is personally to leIIL VOation. tlip o? Inuo Appr ed as to form and legA rty. ty . �►�nKat• As ' tant County Attot-ney .��� r��i 2Q23, or has produced Notary P�►bl�e' My Commission Expires: Goo i Ul ml I a [oil OR yl I I m Al",.., . a= • . •• . � � �� � ••� � � 1 is � �� FIRS`I' AIV.CEN1iIV.�EN'I' 'I`C� LAND EXCHANGE AGREEMEN'Y' Git� AI3VISOit�, LLC T�CIS AI��IEN�h�IENT (hereinafter referred to as the "�►xnendment") is made and entered rota this ��� of April, 2022 (the "Effective Date" ), by and among C M Advisors, LL,C, a Floricla`��: �'mited liability company (hereinafter referred to as the "Developer") and �- Collier Co ��,.�' -�la �ida, a political subdivision of the State of Florida (hereinafter referred to as "County").e ,.;'� �_.;.��_:���ividually referred to as the "Pa�c`tY" and collectively referred to as the "Parties." .�� ��" :� ��� _ . .:�� '�iTHEREAS, the<:�art��; 2�21 (hereinafter referred,lo, Page 1878 in the Collier C �� n �?VHEREAS, the paxtie Agreement by 9U days as set f WHER,EA�S, the Cal11E this amendment is in the best Nt3W, THEREFCJRE, valuable consideration exchan contained herein, the parties a l . .A.1 I of the ab o expressly incorporated herein by reference R��xTALs: centered into a Land Exchange Agreement dated I�Iovember 9, s the "Agreement"), a copy of which is recorded at OR. d4�5, t forth in paragraph 4 of the issianers hereby finds that (10.00) and other good and �nsideration of the covenants correct and are ,,> full,.- - �%i��. 2. Paragraph � ofthe Agreement is hereby amende�:-����'� I�o�s: ,, ,. t '� �; ,; Schedule. Design of the New Improvements shall be co�r� .: ` �,�;`�`�- o later than :� nine 9 ��; {� months firom the Effective Date unless ote':';.�:�, mutually ...� agreed upon by the parties. Permitting of the New Improvern.�h_� _.hall be corn leted no later than � fteen 15� ��� � � ' p �.. a-�� months frorr�,;"E"�fectxve Date unless otherwise mutually agreed upon by the parties. Construction of the New Improvements shall be completed no later than two (2) years and three (3} months from the Effective Date, unless otherwise mutually agreed upon by the parties. as if set faith hereby 3. The County Ir/Ianager may f�.irther ea�tend the Agreement by an additional 90 days without the need of Board approval.. Additional extensions of time will require Board approval. 4. Except as expressly provided herein, the Agreement remains in full force and effect according to the terms and conditions contained therein. If there is a conflict between the terms of this 1��xnendxnent and the Agreement, the terms of this �!►mendment shall prevail. k* OR 6114 PG 3145 *** IN WiTl`JESS WEIZEQ', the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their appropriate officials, as of the date first above Written. ` I�inzel, Clerk of Courts �.�`f 4L. "A40 prpro Veto 416 . te - Me." 'r6 :: . fee ft At .� Jeffrey oW, COunt�?". AS TQ DEVELQPER.: liability pr Signed, sealed and deli�rered in tl�e esence of: Printed Name Signature Printed Name BQA�D QF CQL�NTY CQMIV�ISS�QNER.S CQLLIEI�. CO By n C� Willi��i L. McDaniel, J1•., Chai G1VI.ADVISQ�.S, LLC a Florida limited w INSTR 6163148 CLERK OF THE REC $282=00 OR 6045 PG 1878 RECORDED 11/22/2021 4:17 PM PAGES 33 CIRCUIT COURT AND COMPTROLLER, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA tl�e �`��el•� © � certain �.+��-�'-acre. parcel:ofreal ptopei�ty located descr b can; hjbpi t B attached .hereto and made a part hered w13CR.C* A;S; upon the terms and condo desire to excl�a.nge theCounty i'arce� fac• the S A 14 i�rth her�;ixi., th�C©unty Arid the: Developer iand w�HC�RE. Samong other-+cQrisldei-a�ions:s��a��� Developer gill. alsp � l � d�sign,perrx�it .and co��str�uct Parcel at its so le cost and %expense (the "P�'oject") nand he ve di*ai�aage �aset�ent foie operation and irtai�tenance of the the Couri�y; and I`��r, as past. of �hisiandexchange; the ;�erdetei�tionfacility �� fhe ��ttap he .Count'. a. minimum 20�-foot x4 detention facility:: at, i o c*A to w1-3EI�:EA.S, the oilier Jaunty Board of County Co exchange of real pi•c��e.i�t}� is i� the best in�er�st oft�e County. _ IgYIMII�YrM�Y�1Yr�Y�YYIrYII�� A made and r ' .dviso�rs, UNC, 1 and Collier Cotlntyl.-Toj "County"), eacki GNP ADVISORS, LLC L. L3 I��CHAI'�E �,Cft.EEI�iEI�tfi thereinafter referred to as tl�e `�Agreemerit"� i s Chk this of o2 f the "Effective 'f}ate''�, and among Gl� ida limited liabilaitycompany (hereinafter referred to as the ``Developee") i a, .a political ,subdivision of the State of Florida (hereinafter zeferred to as dually referred to as the "Party" and collectively referred:t� as the "Parties." RECITALS.: WHEREAS, C0ut11y :.,s the owner of a certain. 3.79+/" acre parcel. of real propetty located el ih unineorpormed Cniilct• unty,�.ft:northem 0.6+1.. acres of which is; transportation right 6fway, anti is expressly excluded zfrotb,_ hi `Agreement. This parcel, less and except the: north�in 'i�:6�j� acres, is described on Exhibit :fit c� d,hereto and made a part hereof (the County Parcel )..Tide County Parcel is cur tly us ct -di rater detention facility associated • it�h the iri mokaiee Road dralnage systei-n�; and -L w.i I:ER.E.>�S, L�e�elopei• is cn u�incc�rpo.rated Collier County; the `Swap Par�cei''�; a>�d r. r� i�si�ers h�erc�y � tlds that this consideition of Tcxi .11iar'sother consdet-atict� exchanged arziongst fihc patties; and ii� cot�sidet�:tion of the herein, the parties agree as follows; F`�s co�zta in ed I. A11 of the above RECITALS are true and correct and are herciay expressly incorp�irated herein by reference a.s if sit forth fully below, �. The parties agree to the exchange of real property interests and associated iionprovements as set forth belo�r: _ oR 6045 3. Ne�v .Irrt rtiertents. Developer agrees to deign, permit, and construct a crew pond site rind r•elaeei: drainage facilities on the Swap Parcel at its sale crest and expense, including all neeessa 4 -stort v ater pipe interconnections (the "New Improvements"), The New Improvements de ` treatment and attenuation of stormwater runoff for Immokalee Road, shall pr' I1 adificati,a 'A A6A toy 10 e tl'+eatment, attenuation, and discharge from Immokalee oa "Bask *.8" to the. Cocohatchee na['� i_ I be coordinated through a South. Florida Water Management. District Aw �SFWMDA p � i o f obtained *by Developer, and shall result in no increase- of hydraulic grade Ad line elevations for thWA& wi4mg lmmokalee, Road drainage inlets inctuded i "8asln 82' The 46 increase of impervious area`=f the future auxiliary a ry lane for l~tandall Boulevard A .1 linmo�;aiee load shall be modeled at}d nearporatod w to the permi ung of the New Improvements: The County shal l have the opportunity tom_ andapprove the SFWAMD permit and s1�a11 be the co"applicant For respective pemin applioat o, , as needed.. Developer shall coordinate with the Coutrty on all facets of this Project.' `. A .ev lrn rovenments shall be corn lete+d rrfl later than six 4: schedule: Desiz P p months from tine ffecti e bate un sLA . % rwise mutual l agreed upon .by the parties. Perrn fitting. _; , f ofthe Tew Improvements ents shah be colplet 4no late; than ,twelve .(I2). months from the Effective t ;. date uriless.ctherrisetutualiy agree u ;ors _b the parties Ctnstruction of the:New Irnprovernents sha11 be;cumpleted no laterthan two C ,y.4 A A. the -Effective Date. unless otherwise rmutually agr ei d upon oy; the parties. % ,' A. .. ` -, 5-. Plans �for� New Ire rover�ents r "5 onstruction,. Develo er, .at no cast to the AA Count r small r are tell . f, a - , p = P P p x rna y nd na1 r� ; � .g design .,plans -and specrficat oris and provide theta ti the County for revieir, cornn�` t and :pjroval: Plans and spedcati+uns must be approved by th+ County prior to any cons hov,ever, such approval slil[ not be unreasonably withheld. Y %lAA A. ` ``.ti. %, At a. dw 6 approval of Contractors and lnsMctiol A AAA Orcons#io, DevYloper� shall gravid .the County with a 4st of all* proposed conA tractrI TA a. su�bcontracto€ for the Project. Developer shall: not utilize .any contractors or subcontract �o whom the bounty objects. The County may 1~rire a CET. I:rrslaector for, this Project and .shall hau tl cA right to if pect� the work throughout oonstrUction, and the Developer shall promptly cac�+e`e�t,4'14111 .noted €Iefects. Devela er r. P shall provide the ou ty girth cc��nstructton sched>ale aizd pros i pti the County of any delays..or other haEnges its such schedule throtighout the duration ot':;tA Ad. art/ -PAO .. *:s. Ad A Ad A Title Commitment. Prior to construction, Developer shall �rdo apt no:cosf to the ,�., County, a title cofnmitment or �ah attorney`s opinion of -title pertaining to- the. era Parcel, and at .� or prior to closing, Developer shall..r�en�ove or cure any .hens, enctimbrance'.Wdty i�rtle d��'ects revealed in such title commitment or, attorney'$ ti,tlezopihion .that are +ob ectit Add to the County. If, prior to the ctr�nrnetrcernen of construetron, tle County has an ob ectron to title to the SwapParcel, which-. the County determines Developer Acannot, -resolvt witltiin A a reasonable time. period. and with reasonable effort, the C04 unty shall leave the right to terminate this :Agreement as .further• described in paragraph 9 of this Agreement, and thereafter neither the. County nor the- Developer shall have any :further obligations or Iiabil�ity thereunder. 8, Easen�ents: At closing, the Developer will convey to the bounty,; at no cost- to the County, a minimum 2� font drainage easennsnt for operati�tlI and n�aintenanec o#` the dew Impro�er�ents. Pr•iar to �closit�g, Developer• shall coordinate with the Cou�ity ion the precise location of the drainage easement, Developer shall provide aY �ll curve s and le al descri P Lions for such 46 easerrren#=pine , at 11.0 Cos 0 ttorney's op of the drainage r d by a # censed l�`lorida. property surveyor,. for the Counity's review and. approval BCounty, All easement documents shall be subject to :approval by the County ;e. knee conveyed, the County will be responsible fair• the perpetual maintenance asem rat. �k. fA _ t� � .�n.: � he degree l�.eeessa#� for tl�e prtr�ect, :each party here4�y-�ran�s the other party a right'�f;?t �4 to enter upon their respective parcels. l 0. Termirrattr oty may terminate this Agreerr�ent :tie County does not ,:, �:. y. approve the design plans f iAe New Improvements; �2� if the Coutrty is 4 not; reasonably satisfied with title, survey, en.v:ir6h ient.al 4z:off other due diligence investigations . pertaining. to the Swap Parcel• 3 if -the deadlines set f tit l'paragraph 3 ofthis A eeme f4.r +esi " n errrtittin and ,} g 5 p` g� cor3struction have not been mct3 .al s t mutually agreed upon ext+ensionts of tine. or (4.} i:f Developer d©est not commence L 66m lbw construction of the New. Improvements in accordance wlth the County approved" design ,1�:: eci ratio s. and releVaat. e��t iits. Develo er may Y PP g p- 1` P p P Y terrrrrnate tl�rs Agreement prior to the&Ipotfi n'oement#of�construction on the Protect 7f`t, determli�cs in its. sole discretion that the coasts a" to itb the Project are not feasiblo ...or. �lirriirrate any ,y ns . benefit to the .D.evel`oper from tl�€s Agree 1 eni;ould Developer exercise its termination rigl1ts} any casts f ncurred . re.lated� to -the Project S14. l i . 1►'Inc Ole iy by Developer. Prcjcct..on�o. Developer' I notify the County in writing once earstruction .• 4. ofthe New Improvements :has been cornpletedii du I. � li have 30 days follo�rz�ng receipt ofthis notice to inspect the �Swap� Parcel acid. blew . f tipr•ovib nt5,, 'following `coar�pletion, but pr or to. Josin:g, Developer steal] provide to the County all i opa4d `1 errnit completion certifications, as� built �c�rtstrrrctic rr plans, are updated srcrivey of the � ar�vic�ence that all �ntr�actors, subcorntractoifs and materialmen have. been paid, and e ' c , o the County of lien waivers,, Developer shal l also prov ide executed deed ' and easement .cony " yance doeurnerts'or rev iev► by s the -County Attorney s Office, .. _.._ 1' +Clos�n ,The closing fa►r the exchange. of Parcels:. Will ?._:held an a date mutually agreed upon by the parties, brit shall'occur� no later than three (3)`n� t1�� er pro,�+cct completion uhless otherwise agreed upon by the Parties. Developer shall convey i Si?a Pamel to _the County as 'well as all �i'�lew ln��pravenrients th�es�eon, and County .shad accept ��� ��:�: l`pro�+einents. The County steal! sirn��Ita�n�eously convey �l�e County Parcel to Develop�z, -�=��3e�l+aper• shall 6e responsible for all recording fees WIG closing costs for both Parcels; At Mee c o�,t' g, the County well deliver to Developer the following: - a� :� warranty deed with fee sinnple tide free and clear• ofal� liens and encumbrances except non-rnonetaFy UTIUUMbrUn eS, if any} conveying the County -Parcel to Developer, in tihe fore of l xhibit Q b} An owner}s Tile P6 icy is ering the. County. Parcel with no ob, ectionable title exeeptliorts c} Possession of' -the Ccunty Tract; and d} ll otherksuch documents and instruments as may be reason Any and a to effectuate -.the transfer of -the County Parcel as provided herein: in, PG 1881 �►.t:the clQsi��g, Developer will deliver to the County the full©`�ring 'war ranty deed with fee simple title free and clear of all liens and encumbrances '. 4, �io: e eept non monetary encumbrances, if any) conveying 'the Swap. Parcel to the � au y, in the f`ort� of l��hibit Ca b}A bill :` f sale, owner's affidavit, attorney affidavit, and subordination for any New ,Irr Bents not covered by subsection (a) above, .in. the forms of Exhibit D, ff ne6 ssa c) ` `hI& I` cute�d drainage easement described in paragra 'h 8, jn theform, of Ekhtbit E _ LL d An � V= ' 1e Policy coverin the Swap Parcel # no objectionable title g 13 e ceptlons. e) 1'ossessiotl` f theV-$wa Parcel and New.lirprovements; and :. f) An and all othe su64,documents and instruments as may be reasonably necessaary s to effectuate t)Zt tr`��ne�-�f the Swap .Parcel as provided herein, IV _ ,-;.�. Y "L 13. Maintenance., Upon � da aIn Hof the Warranty Deed for the Syria �'arccl, the County w111 beConl-ek solely tespons1b1 44 th :perpetual operation. and maintenance of the storm. vale management on filewapl trceh41 ch �nclucles the :stormratez• pipes; starnwatet� pond }:and associated I discharge into the CD.& � .e canal 1. ;waive• oiabiiity .and Clisr .�o r, on behalf of, .itself; its successors and . =pie asstg s jncluding any and all ftEturc owners:a ,.both commercial and 6residential., within the Development), hereby waives any and all .6a M§ dair ages, ;i�ncludirtg but not lffnited to l~`Uwe business damages an lass of access as a reS�c�f% ho : �•pposed o�rerpass at 'Intersection of l andall Boulevard and lmtnokalee Road or its constr t t �, eveioper shall give ail successors, assigns, teriiahts and buyers, both residential and coin xfopiov rho purchase or lease land from Developer a separate. written notice of the planned roveAis:iff v�i �l�e s�ate��nt that the Coctn��i rviil not construct any sound dull or other b4tii ter off' any k� 1 rd&tce the: impact or noise of the. overpass, _ ` -. _a 15. Compliance with.Law, Obligations of the County tz t4 i " green7en�t arc s object Of to approval by the Collier County. Board of County C4Cnt'1'tISSiOners, an, an ►ther applicable, state, local, or Ofedcral lave. \ IV 16. Cost of Advertisement, Developer shall cover the ful l cost ,rIV .I. dverti�ing this excha:n:ge of -property operty in .a newspaper of general Circulation published in the Cori y,--if any: Legal Flatters 1 7. the burdens ofthis Agreement (including. the option to put�ellase��;::shall b'e� bind.ing ttpQn, and the .benefits of this �4gree�-ne�it .shall ixlure to, ail successo�•s x�. interest to the parties �o this greernent, including any Property swaps. 1 -8. Developer acknowledges that the failure of this Agieerr�e.�1:t to addivss any permit, condition, term or restiviction shall not ��lieve +either the applicant:or owner, Q�-their successors ot■ • im :TILA [& W ::�►•� } ass i�gns, o f the n+ec perm l 1 nlg . r�qu reIF die l hich are aWf I this Agrecme t comply with s essity of cotnptying with any tavv, � nance3 t•Ltle ter regulation-t govert1ing said 'rents, conditions, terms or restrictions, event state or federal laws arc ertact�d after the execnttlon of this Agreement, c OF tolo and preclude in whole or in par the panties' comp] iance with the terns �� thin,' :n such event this Agreement shall be modified or IF as is necessat to u:ch ws%I in a manner which best reflects the intent of this. Agreement. This Agreement shall nQ.t 13 b strued or° characterized as a development agrCerrrent under the Florida oca1 + ovemmeriit_ evelopment Agreement Act. IF IF 20. Ail ailiesrSP_RI .Ox xecute his Agreement prior or to it being submitted for approval by rlie Collier County Boar4f.o County Commissioner s. This Agreetiiet� t , halt be recorded by the County in the Official R ' 0 0s t Molli�er County, Florida, within f6tUrteen (t 4) days after .the County 4enters into this greern It ; eveloper shalt -pay all costs of recording this Agreement. ,A copy of the recorded documelolt_*Wt� It irovided to al l pacttes upt�t� request, lF.. IF t .'hs Agreement shall b oveip. l; lorida. The paztles shall. attempt through negottatort betweenuthorlec is there .remains a dispute under this Agree ent, IF FIJI A lternative dispute Resolution Proctdure. may then file an action `in the Circu it Gour't` o with respect to any disputes artsts�g out ofthts ed by. at�d constx�;red under �t�e Taws of the Mate of i to: resrilve any dispute concerning. this ..A.,grecn�ent p ei ; tativ�s.. If these Fe IN ores are not successful, and ..' w partte shah first: use *the Cout�ty's then cUrrent wtn the co lclusiorn.ofthIs procedure, eitfo= party l`'.; tet, ou41 �ty,which Shall be the exclusive venue �.�. This A.gree�nent is a perst�nat A�n�eetn� trN IF ot be sold, tratsferre;d; or assigned, in whole or. in pa i, County, vvl�i`h County tray, in its solo discret:lo n, deny: IF shIF c; ��ig�ts .a.t�c� .ntere$fis hereunder may }�u� the lat i�r �rr�i�ten e�ansent of fihe t, 23. This.A.greement constitutes the entire agreeti�er�;tween tl�+e parties with cespect to thectivitzesot�d herein and supersedes and ta�kcs the place of.a;,a d ail previous. agreements etitere+d into between the at -ties hereto relatit `a p �g to the ti�ansacton' carnplated herein, .All prior representations, undertakings, and: agreements by or between the...IF * t ies'�€e�eto with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement are -merged into; and expressed in; t �IF ,•eement, and any and art prior rept�esentations, urtfertakings, and agreerneli�ts by a�zd betv'n- axties v�►ith•espect IF IF Bp thereto: herebyaxe .canceled. b;-w F.4A IF 4 IF I .�4. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed ot• co�ist��:ted to create 6eveen or among arty of the. partiesarty joint venture or pat'tnet5hip noi• other�isc g�artfi to ode . e '. , authority or power to. bind any other patty hereto to any agreemebt wvhatsoeve V A:I�nrP; ��i� PA.G1� Ti DEFT �LA�� 51�1�t1-�Tt.,1r�E PAGE TC► �t'�L�,t�'i�ir the l*ig►#til Ji . ZN WITNESS wHEREOP, tl�e pax -ties he�-et© have caused tills A.gi•een�ent to be executed by their approprIate offcials, as of the date first above written. L y aP Attest: ,' y ;"IF =:1 BOARD,,C F CQUNTY COMMISSIONERS CRYS," nlIerlc FIe nIFlFeI b tV.Fo4b ZJrFt r. , A I ; B�y i. 4 `�� ` i '•f t "I;_ ;l.f. : •� r_',• i i� rF • :.;^r - AS TO i `E 1?R `� 1� O; lFIF IVIF 5 igned, sealed and .delivered in the priesen8Qol S ignat�rt�e� inter _Name S i gnatu Printed Name STATE OF VL.O R.IDA Ct�UNTY OF COi�L,•IER By: COUNTYYRIQ'A PENNY TLOIZ, Chaii- GIVI A.D�ISORS, LLC 'a 1� (or•id.a lirnited liability company Nam Trtle: r, I IF 4 II OFF FI IF I FOP .a For The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before r�.�e this I Advise liability cor-npany, who is personally lmown to tine ^�- as identification. A.ppro � legalit . as to �ortn aid . �}►shl�ar, Assistant County Attorney Notary play = f F s,F'�L C, a Florida limited .*"or has produced 41 i (A omrnission Ex�ir�es: SANDY SEMAAN Notary Public. Staxe of Florida Cotnmiss�oo Na. GG302858 Commission Expires 02/ I I/2Q23 0 PG 1885 so 0 r. 9 too stolt do I a.rf • ,s*4 so to • _.. .. et Growth Management Department ` F Development Review Division * := - ; .4.`;k Tract 3� a� Golden Gate pUDIIc records cif Copier Cc Range 27 East, CollierCorr Co IF E�Hf BIT "A" Legal Description Golden Gate Estates Unit No•23) tee :U-nit Flo, �3, Plat Soak �, pag+�s 9 tl�ro�g� � � of the % c ida, located in ecfiion 7: Township qts Routh, k.IFlad c. S�rl�ject to Easements and I�es��-i Contal"i"g.�� Acres more or~ 1es �• 1 • l` i ; W L:�Berman, P.S.M. 0 not •o* ...� �f lorrdej 5L veyor and dapper LS 508 ;�� ,r, , r : ,/1 � au0 go 0 # and Surveyor .. tJoss . 'J��y�j Pok WAN 1"04 07/2021 4 '�. to j c`, ' �i 2021FogeO03 1 loop o so t,. o �oo • AR4' 0 r Floi•L -r• ,r' , to . r cord . F�ge 1 af' 1 �.St30 N. �l�rscs�c�c I}rfac, l�i�ples I'IarE�1K 3��0� (23�� 25�-�+�00 's b `�- Gr�wl`h �anager�$nt I�eparfimer�� Development Review Division EXIT I B iT "A" of Tract 30 of Golden Gate Estates Unit No. 23, Plat Book 7, ugh 10 of the public records of Collier County, Florida, (Southern Portion of Tract 36) All #hat part �rct=6 of Golden Gate Estates Unit Na, 23, Plat hook 7, pages 9 through 14 of the UH records of Collier County, Florida, being more particularly described as foI s; Corn mencing at the .,Nadi 6a4t Corner of said Tract 36, Thence along the eastline5id Tract 36, South 00°19'�16" West 73.a'1 feet to the Point of Beginning df-4 6p8 petberein described, Thence continue along ,sas.'Iine South 40°10'10" West 449.36 feet to the . ... southeast corner of said Trat'r 5 Thence along the south line-s ' S-awc r ct 36, North 89°40'50" West 330.00 feet to the southwest corner of said Traci- Thence along the west line of skid �: 3 hence leaving said line North 8� a h described. North C3f�° 19''i �0" East 402.32 feet; �t 333.33 feet to the #*dint af.�eginning of the parcel herein Subject to Easements and Restnations�:; Re -ra % Bearings are assumed and based on the.0. 6 )no of Tract 36 being North QQa 1 Q' 10" East. Containing 3.23 Acres more or less. :;- c.Dat IL Ma€`cus L. Berman, P.S.M. Florida Surveyor and Mapper C.S b086 Gounty and Surveyor i••/atV, 1 y/0I f40�+1 Ref: �02�Iy00� '. :.�• • `Y: Oa ` f; 0• •I +� 1law L IL z$a0 ?Z. Hat•3esho� Dealt, Nx��aa �lorid� 3�lOd (239� 25Z-xd� i =XN�=ETA %S:?) L&GS�k :9G;I Ct�[u- DD C�IQ?)O N THE SOUTHERLY PORTION OF TRACT 36 OF GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT No. 23, PLAT BOOK 7, PA6E 9, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. CUR �" TABU' 1Vo. DEC T� RAD/US LENG CH BE`,�f�' G D1ST�4/YG`B �1 3519 5JJ4o460 JJ461V M 812 2 40 4 3344 06 ff C2 Q 100 MMOKN GAR p.R. 846K 3 t� t�AGE 2,ST 6 3 .OfwAY C 2 =z,mo v tz COID�� SATE 41 1. S�N�S ARE BhSED Oi�i THE 1N[5T 1113E OFTttACf �6 HEiNQ htflR�ii 00' 14'ttY FJIST. 2. QlMEAi3t0A1S M� 1N F&ET 11lVD flt:CiMi4i,S i1-IEREt�F. 311. SUB.I�CTTt} eEA1S��fr�E.CAI.�jTS/I��AJ�pDR(1�tnTR1L'ifiDEhi3COF RECQRR. y, F�AR{`jQ. �� 1 i\�ftl 7i N.i...l RLrI`LV InV�C �i11 �.Gvr?,7. pp�t�1 Cj� y, .RINGI C ...... .... MAl'�CUS L. BBRMAt�, P.S.i+ii.� • .,' :. [, I ; -• � C44!.t.tER COUNTY SU�tVEYpF�.i : ,�; '_• Development Review Divislon growth Management Department ZSt30 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples Pion to 341t}4 ona: 239-2524885 Fax 239M252-6476 r}aTe: Sheet No. SCALD: Fite i�1n: a-07-2a2'1 2 of 2 1�- � ou 2021 �005 y#�Oflonnlx� ►nd II�D'/�tFvw�EngSrtietiinq D+psryrtynt�EnQ�nrali/•p fo►timylGlG SIMy�YOR.a�'+ZtjGS1G+"M d+G fsL/yasj?D21•8QS Lrvth fafigb itttcf+ of Lrk@ 3+b 4Qf U23.dK*J. 14ViII'2y lO.QS:2� AtS Auk,Ckp PaF tUe+wal bocvmentwtianl_pc? 0 at too, s. 4444 G� Growth I'�llanagement Departmer�� Development Review Division E.XHI�IT "A" r n Of OpArt of TraCt 36 of Goiden Gate Estates Unit No. 23, Plat Book t pagp§AtF�rough 19 of the public records of Collier County, Florida. (Northern Portion of Tract 36) All that parfi �f"�r�� -��B of Golden Gate Estates Unit No, 23t Plat Book 7, pages 9 �,� 'c Coun Florida bein . more articular) through 10 of the�,, ublt records of Collier ty, g p Y described as follgisc; r Beginning at the Nett A t c purer of said Tract 33; Thence along the nortl•t,-Ii e` s id Tract 3$, also being the south right-of-way line of lmmokalee Read �B:R r ,,} ,.3 4.'i I feet along concave to the north, h4vi 03°35'19" and being subtend feet to the northeast corner's Thence along the east line o1 Thence leaving said east line a non -tangential circular curve �,ius flf 533�•,�6 feet, through a central angle of a it ord which bears North 81 °22'40" East, 334.06 i 6t 36 T a . , South 00°19'14" vilest, 78,01 feet; a te of said Tract 36; t2a` 5" West 333.33 feet to a paint on the west Iir•�` - - _ ' .k.. Thence alon said line North 00°1 East` g Tract 36 and the Paint of Beginning Qf f a. te Subject to Easements and Restrictions of i Bearings are assumed and based on the we = 00"19'10" East. Containing 0.66 Acres more or less. Marcus L. Berman, P.B.iill, I^ )bride Surveyor and Mapper LS 5086 County Land Surveyor Date: 10107/2t�21 ref: �a21-OQ4 3.11 feet tt� said Northwest corner of I herein described, Tact 3B being North �so 'Pow At ot IL VON a, ,i: �JOA to . r�ORION 4 It 'K: ,�,, .,. , . tPWs �"- Alt aw/ _.. so x8t}0 N. H4rs�ahae Drive, �l��lta Ploc�da 34gd {239) 2.52-2d00 PG 1889 c��taor�a� a THE NORTHERLY PORTION OF TRACT 36 OF GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT No. 23, PLAT BOOK 7, PAGE 9, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORxDA. PlA7 t�dRTF� i- M lYo. D�� T� RADlU.� L�lV�t CH 8 .�RlIVG D/ST�#1YC�" C1 0343519 5334. 46 334.1 N. 61:2.2 40Fo 334. 06 MOKIP M RO B46 �.G1�1111 DIP of 4� G�JLDEN GATE E:;S.1 UNIT No. 23 N.89°4{?'�0"Ittl. 33�1.�iQ' •t t : • ' f f' • .t • ' i 1 ' i •/ • ( �. a f q 1 0- OIL r + 40 Otto Woo Mari P.S.M : ' lJiAR U$ L. BR..l: t dd�.LIER C0UN7`Y SURVEY69 Do ,.: ' _ ;; _ :-+ FLORDID IDA SURVEYOR h MA F ��&-5068 • {' - toot a DID 04 to C�OLL(ER+C{�UNTY �eveiopment Review sion Growth 1 enaumIflu #Department 2$00 North Horseshoe Driv$, Naples Florida 04104 Ph met* 239-252-6885 Fax 239-252•-6476 WIND gate: Sheet Na. SCALE; '! 0�07-242�1 1" toot 100' E�ite Na: 0 kL1ltt•+ri•nq a>td il�pvtat{erilteptnertt/tq Acpsrtr+++nA[+>II3+wlky Folde»5�iC110 SVRVkY diVllMl�aSltielden data< &t+tesUal.1.4G1 rk.th �e,tron of 2nq 36 6GE i112.d,/.p,1DJ�J1.tr21 SC.02:12 /Sd, AI+IoUG l�bF(Gt�tcr>tt Dotweerttilk64pe.3 •� .1� :•! F IF - ._ +� - •?fit 4 IF -. 7IF • a Q, + k OF +'.:. . IF :�: J• `t ' a �; F . I' 1[ 1. 4 Is IF d a' oR 6045 PG 1891 V Growth Mar�agernent Departm�nt Development Review Division EXHIBIT pB" Legal Description Tract 62, Golden Gate Estates Unit No.23) Tract 52 of Go�,�er�;e Estates Unit No. public recordsY of .Ceder County.; Florida, Range 27 East,-c11'€er Cou.0ty, F1Drida. 23, Prat Book 7, pages 9 #hrough 14 0� the located in Section 27; Township 08 South, .Subject to Easements end Ro` tractions of Record.. �ontalnrng 5 Acres more�:ar,[e�s:tLI e coos A. Le . rrpan, P.S.M. fig tr,t da-Bca yar and Mapper E..S 5i �nt�r,'° Surveyor r, i nO Date: 10/07/2021 Ref: 2021-0.02 Page f cif Z ��Oa N: i��rseshoc Rrtvc, Nn�lus Florida 3�iiD4 (Z39) z.'�2�2�OQ oR 6045 PG 1892 EXHOBOT B I SKE7CH OF DESCRRPT ON ALL OF TRACT 52 OF GOLbEN GATE ESTATES UNIT No. 23, PLAT BOOK 7, PAGE 9, COLLIER COUNTY, FLOAMA. dap, ILI, I I _ _ ... I 14 pU 36 53 a i �- I I •'. t"k . r. �.4 I ti ,:,papa I PLAT" NORTH `:z I GRAPHIC S C �,�� ; 0 100 15a `a- a lapp pp _ 5.89'4{)' Sd"E. 330.00apt _ I I IN FEET I lu 1 inch 100 ft. � I 4,411pif papa' pap `; r Al I alp 1. :vp.'<r '. �pill'f C7 aepa tt; :.J k I l' S app Onral I I ,,. I pap _all I ,; I i ` •.pep s '• ;;Q T , ;:. C.. 444a 1. r`+ I �►155 A ,. I I o ;;37 p .. . , :pl.. V, ..' z :. :: - - I z .:4 o I I I .� '' `•• • .T 7 I c I I hi.. I I ap tipp app pap Or r Ati j I appall 00 pp i t l' .L. _ar pa 4 J K_ pt I _ .,� e- � - iop _ tr {F :"ap ap)'i., aI .( pap S.89°40'50"E. 330.00'la a 22ND AVE NEAll 60' ROAD EASEMENT 1, BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE WEST LINE OF TRACT 52 BEING NORTH Od• 19't0' EAST. '•� r...:L� ` : ... • - 2. DWENSIONS ARE IN FEET AND DECIMALS THEREOF. CUS L, $ERMAN, i'S�VI: -"� �� , , ' 3. SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. COLLIER COUNTY SURVEYCIR.�� � , 4.• 4YARCE L CONTAINS 5 ACRES M440f3Ir OR LESS. FLORIDA SURVEYOR & MR'Iv$ soadt1 �, ,`;: . COLLIER COUNTY Development Review Division Growth Management Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Maples Florida 4104 Phone: 239-252-6885 Fax 23911tio,252"6476 Dace: Sheet No. SCALE. File No: 1 o-1 1iomit2021 2 of 2 1" = 201 2021 .002 N1}D�„t;nq antt t.�„yt;eM[nQ:nrtrAn�jpaps�tm►�E►+glndrh,p tddt�q+tao 5tJA5tEt DRA+tih►JGS�G�Wen G,ut t�ISHs1,1'07S��fuiT Tr�el S?dw¢. TOJf7l2IIti SAA2A ML IwFvCADtb1(dtnual0ecs,maM��niR[7 tz :. -44+ IV_ _ t'� t;M1' OR 6045 PG 1894 Prepared by and return #a: o!#ier county `rranspodation Emineeft- ROW 2885 Sou Homeshoe Drive N pie ; F rids,34104 L PRQ�#�CT��� PARCE 1=0L I `� wA�RANTY D��D THIS y1lARRANTY. ,DEED is made this day of 20 by Einsert grantorts) namets) in,,,p and bold followed by marltal status In lawur case non-bt "J? whose marling add s [Insert mailing address] (collectively [delete If not applicable], "Grantor"}, to COLL! ' ERAZOLINTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, whose mailing address ;s 3299 Tami ni TraWEast, c/o the Office of the County Attorney, Suite 800, Maples, FL 3 4112 ("Grantee"). ' IT ,r (Wherever used herein'-::� respective heirs, legal tapresen as the context requires.) 1/1IITfVESSETH: That Grafit hereby conveys to Grantee, the fc and other valuable consideration, �rgntor" and `Grantee" Include all the parties to this instrument and their as.�8rs, and assigns. Grantor and Grantee are used for singular or plural, fc�r.,sn ,in consideration of the sure of Ten Dollars ($10.00) eeerpt;4nd sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, wtng:deiCIffbed land situate in Collier County, Florida: See Exhibit " "attached Being [choose one] all ! a portion' o recorded in Official Record Book County, Florida. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the the sage, ttsgetl appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise ap a, [or insert legal description] : property conveyed to Grantor by Deed . �_ , of the Official records of Collier �'th _�tl.;tie tenements, Meredi#arttents, and :ng in e simple forever. Grantor hereby covenants and warrants that Gran vit , Wolly seized of said property in fee sire le; that Grantor has ood ri ht and lawful authorl self a d convey theproperty; that Y Grantor herebyfull warrants the title to the roe and wul; defers the same agaEnst the lawful Y p l� rtY.. claims of all persons whomsoever, and that the property is fr of alt,,encumbrances except for easements, covenants, and restrictions of record and the lien' of-^rsl estate taxes and assessments not yet due and payable. Grantor represents titat Grantor's property Lchoase one] isies#-eat nAt homestead property, nor is it contiguous therett�. This property [choose one] Is ! is not being acquired by CollieirZotii petfiion in eminent domain and [choose cane] is ! is not subject to the re&tt7cl Section 73.013, Florida Statutes. (choose "Is" If a condemnation suit ffle '-vproperty [or] is t#y. ursuant to a io:i posed by +�ittft�d]'�� This property is being acquired under the threat of condemnation and documentary stamp tax. [delete if not a capital improvement project] [ signature page follows ] is ::eXsm � .��`��rom aR 6045 PG 1895 lf�! }i1liTfVESS VlIHEREC}F, Grantor has $xecuted this instrument on the day and year first above -w��tten. - . Sign Printed �l arr-e Signat�cre 4Witness ��� Printed Name _ ,;` :�� -�. ' �� STAVE CF FL{�RiDA �; ':..''�;`.;: � '7_; COI�NTY pF :� �1r .: 1,; tt ;, The Grantor: [name of grantor, caps not boi [name of grantor, Scapa not boldj ,Lr, �' � , �'. ow�dged before me by means of ❑physical ,' �. , da of 2C� b [insert presence �; y � � Y grantors} d��w marital status in lower case non-bdld�, who: `jam ;�` �:;, is 1 are �choase ones persorraily knavrn,;, ;r�n$�.._'':� =: �` ^ `�� 4R ,� � �-. �w: produced �] a driver's iicer�se, CAR ❑' � ''�`'`� - , ��,. - - ,.. ;.:;�:`' -fig. �. �� ��_. J'. fE}regO�rtg �rlstrurx�e�tt was c#d� ;.. - flr � online notarization `<: _� �i$ . -�- narne(s} in Daps and tsoitt fp110 (sfi�x nota,�$1 seal above) Approved as to faun and legality: .�..ar.�..�... ��....wr.a Assistant County Attorney � / � Signatur$ .of2�ary �fblic �. 8: ��� as ides#ifica#ion. printed Marne `",-..r `-_:° Serial I CommissE �' # (if;an�}�4: filly Commission Expir+�s:;-��-�� �` }" ., --_- ,� :,�: - -:� - a. -�- _, ''� . _����.. - J . ,. -r.:re.� `: �. �l� +� _.__.... �L • Woe a a .I � � ■l l!Jl r'J I i t I�'orrn� S � Rev• 200�- (TJtillfy �aeiiities 'warranty Deed and 8111 of Sa�c� [Leave P blank Space in upper right hand corner for recording purposesi. DR AINAG FACILITIES WARRANTY DEED AND BI1i.,�► SALE �. THIS INDENTURE made this day of 120 , between'[Narne of Grantor - see Instruction No. '` a t i-iTi_dter referred to as "Grantor"), and the BOARD OF COUNTY Y. CO i1vlISSlQNERS OF COLL JAR COUNTY, FLORIDA, its successors and assigns, (hereinafter referred to as "Grantee"). _ :I'RtESS ET1-l: That sand Grantor, for and in consideratrc p ;t :::s m of Ten Dollars 10.00) and other good and valuable acknowledged, consrderatron to said Grantor in hand paid by;��� atc�,`Gr has granted, bargained and sold to the said Gran-te, ar ntee, the receipt whereof is hereby � identify all types of drainage facilities being cony thereof lying in, on, over and under the following ft repair andfor maintenance of said facilities, systems) in Collier County, Florica, to wit. ,rantee's heirs, successors and assigns forever, all inage facilities and/or system(s) or portion(s) r nd, for operation, relocation, installation, ,)A'ignl(s) thereof, all situate and lying and being See exhibit "A}' attached hereto and incorporated' ' reference herein.) �I�hibit "F." attached hereto is a sketch or other graphic: i•epresentaton that depict$ the physrcal locat�On of the dl•arnage systbylt ` Conveyed.} ' 1 ,f '•-. tip_ and said Grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to sand dra€rage facilitieanj or poi•tior�{s) thereof, be they realty, personalty, or• mixed, and Grantor- will defend si __ ':anst all claims of all persons whomsoever. For the purposes of this conveyance, the drainage,. ae �;it4i �1,system�s) andfor• P P ::Y..� -, onions thereof conee ed herein shall not be deemed to convey an of the lands esc.j ibed in either P t} Y y y exhibit. Grantor and Grantee are used for singular or plural, as context allows, A `sketch or• other graphic rrepresentation showing the location of the drainage facilities, etc., being conveyed is attached as exhibit «B,s TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same r.tnto the Grantee and its assigns, together with the right to eater upon said land, excavate, relocate andlor take ar intradr.ace materials for• the purpose of constructing, relocating, Page i of 2 operating, reps#ring and/or ratElerWise maintaining drainage systerczs the�'eon, Grantor and Grantee are used for singular or Plural, as the context requires. IN Wi ME : .,Z. EO , Grantor has caused these presents to be executed the date and year rs t above riSLY i�. 4 It a'7— , Itness and signature block - see Instruction No. 3] '[A cknawledgn�ent and 4- notary block -see Instruction No. 4] Prepared by: �nam e of person=repJarlrtg: �h is instrusnentJ Address of arsonpreparingthisistru C P ,4 - y: ':+ \\ tot c o712021 =: ;`; .. lb '.:;. 1. Ile Page 2 of � • MA Form 6 � Rev. 200� (Owner's AffYdavit) xeofee l- STATE QF 'S AFFi�A'U'IT CtJi.Ji�l`l`Y OF _� n�"rn��l^ Count BEFO E ME, the un ersigned authority, personally appeared , who to me is well known, and havi l . �y game is :ei�r-=clty sworn and under oath, deposes and states ; am over the age of twenty-one (21) years, ain sid jul is, andtq have personal knowledge of tl�e ass '�•ted herein. 2, I am the owner of said real property:lafe >� "Awhich shows the location of the su `c .,d`ri 6`ry 3. All persons, firms, and corporations, inc !ge i~acilitios being conveyed. sub -subcontractors, rnatel•ialmell and suppliers to plans and specifications, or extra iteins; used ink'" a.nd descriE�ed on Exhibit enet•al contractor, all labot`ers, subcontractors ai��i furnished services, labor or materials according ;c iI. .action, installation and/or repair of [identify type of drainage facility] drainage systetn(s) or portion( have been paid in full and that such W014K has been full current owner of such facilities. • -epf on the real estate hereinafter described, G 1 ._lwt`.d and unconditionally acce tea b the A . . 1} �' ;5 IIF p�` claims have been made to the owner, not• is any suit 'napendi rig an behalf of any contractor, subcontractor, sub -subcontractor, supplier, laborer or inaterial�inen, ank4nlu voLl Lpttel mortgages or conditional bills of sale have been given or are now outstanding as to the subject dra agae"sys-t"em:(s) ots portion(s) thereofLI placed upon or installed in or on the aforesaid premises. he subject drainage s stems of portion(s) s thereof and/or ease R Title tot bj`nt(srf +ny, being conveyed he Count is not encumbered b an recorded mortgage, recorded assignment orAr�nts or profits, by any the y Y Y....�.. recorded Uniform Commercial Code Financing Statement, or by any other recorded � doottrrseht that imposes a security interest that could negatively affect conveyance of marketable title to the drainage system(s) or portions) thelReof and/or any easetiient being conveyed to the County. OR Title to the drainage systems} or portioti(s} thereof and/or easement (s) being conveyed to the County is subject to the following security interests) by the following recorded instrumet7t(s}; Page i of 3 �� •� .!� •!! l .Mortgage {or Assignment of Rents and Proftts� [describe only teeoided instrume�its that impress � a security. interest against title to the systems} or portions} thereof andlor any easeme��tt being conv�yed.o the County] to Mist name of the mortgagee{s}] ,dated , ,�_____� and` �t��.eat t�,R. Book , 1~'age et seq., l'ttblic Records ofCollie�• County. I, 2. [..1��=1#r�aticir�g Statement, recorded at C�,R. Boob ,Page _______�, P��blic Records of Colli�r� �o �`� .: -� ''��` � f Sta e at 'r`allahassee Leo» Count �'Iorida at O.R, 3. �JCC-;� �r:�corc��.�vw�th Plortda Secretaz•y o t ( Y)� Book ,�Y.M1`pag�_{ _,�Y, ,�� :���`� '- each mort � e andlor each assi . nrr�ent of �{cnts and rofi#s, and �TNSTRUCTIaN• fihe �,ffiant must list gg� � each tJC�--1, and�or each �othe`r reorded docun�et�t that is a security interest that could negatively affect co��veya��ce of good and a���e�,���ble bile to any of tl�c drainage systetn(s} or portions} thereof �(andlor easement{sj, if any} being Gad; � fed_ to the County. If good, tnarketabie title to the drainage system{s} or portions} thereof and/or any �ase�rie� � ��;�eing conveyed is encumbered by aczy such recorded instrume��t, the Affant.must briefly describe ea�.I� s�+��,.�`ecord�ed security instn.tme�nt, incl«ding the book aid I�rst page where tha�.security instrument'hasi�+��reco�tied. It is not necessary to attach a copy Qf any such recorded a� �. document to the.Af�idavit. Igo not list any��N+�t�e of Co�nmencernent or any Reservation oFMine�•al Ttights, etc., because such �dtic�ments .da not`Iin�pFs � security interest against good, marketable. title to the .. .. :, drainage�system(s} or portion{s� thereof'�l -,,r�°�s�ment(s}, if any, being conveyed to the County. �:;;_ . �. As and on behalf of the owner of the subj:t,�dra�n �� � - consideration hereby agree and guarantee, to h ;: p`lorida harmless against. atty lief, claim or suit by ` supplier, mechanic, rnatet•ial�tnan, or laborer, and aj systern(s} o�• portianEs} thereof, does for valuable o�rd of County Commissioners of Collies- County, r �er;r��: contractor, sttbconttaGtor, sub-scabco��traeto�•, nstl3�t,el �nartgages, seccirtty interests or repair of the subject drainage systecn(s) or portions) thereof'by ar pi�tral, as the context rewires. ►r �b�l:�a��;f of t�wner. �.ffiant is Used as si��gcrlar ,. { �'� � �`. �� �� �ti, :1;. 4:: ?. 'I'he drainage system{s} or portions} thereof referred to �xn described in tE�e attached l�xhibit "A". F�3I2'�'ii�It A��IAI�'I' SA''�'��'T'� N,A.U��T. located withifl the ��eal pi•opet•ty -� _ A>`��: :- ����� Ir ; �. .J� ,, �. ,,� :ti 5 1 ,(T 1�' �� 'Ta...- �� I�AT�D this day of , �0�. � � - ��Y�. C3wnerlAff�ant's Signature . Printed I�lan�e of A,ffiant SwrJRN T� AND SUBSCRIBED bef©�•e me by means of Cl physical p�•esenee o�• Q online nota�•ization, tl� i s day of , 20 , by perso��ally known or Q produced _�Pe of ide Page 2 of 3 as identificatio��. who is t7 •' .!�Rolm ��ig�ature �P�•�nted or T�%'p�c Prepared �y: [na..me Public) �e'�f�otaly Public �j of:pei preparing this instrument] [Actress of person p�eir,�ing dais instrutnec�tI I VA 4 �.t ri .. ..\.' N IL y`. Page 3 of 3 �yail PG 1902 Form 5 - R.ev, 20a4 - (Afforney�s Affidavit:} ATT+QRN IF I ;_ STATE OF - -e_of StateYa. IF COUNIT OF .*:i4filloame c 'S A�'FlI3AV'I'I' t. BEFORE ME, the undersi acttl�ority, on this day of , 20 ., personally a ppeared , who is to tne well known, and having been sworn upon oath, deposes and states: _F I IF l , My name is , i any over the age of twenty-one ( t) years, am otherwise Sul furis, and have pers., 1(.4*Fledge of the facts asserted herein. _�� 2. I am a licensed attorney, Ron'&1 B >; L` >. .,: , authorized to practice law in Florida and am .` .t ,, currentl racticing law in t ,51t`` of Florida. My business address is �y `T My business telephone numberOF �s A IF l.4 ` My business mailing address is _FRI., IFF IF IF l 3. This Affidavit is given as an inducement to the Bo,d_County Commissioners of Collier County, IF Ia_ Florida, to accept the dedication or conveyance of iden %o drainage facility] drainage system(s) o�' p Y .; portion(s) thereof located within or upon the real property* F bed x the attached Exhibit "A"', which is incor orated herein by reference, said land being located in Col . er.:� �nty, Florida. p ;`. 4. The Affiant has examined record title information to the underiy' x• al property and the drainage referenced in this affidavit inel.ud tigta:.not limited to, information facilities being conveyed to the County . *; requested from the Florida Secretat•y of State relative to any Unifoi' coililinercial Code financing IF statements,IF {. ` e described herein is ive fulle 'a ' azne of owner as 5. The record owner of the underlying real property [g g :�� IF IF it appears in title Worixtation; if owner is an entity, make reference to the laws c► tIF ^ar jurisdiction under which entity was created and presently operates] (hereinafter "Owner"). The Owner acquired record title to the subject real property by instrument recorded at Official Records Book , at Page [insert official record book and first page of instrument where owner acquired title], Public Records, Collier County, Florida. [INSTRUCTION: if the record owner is an entity, the Affiant trust indicate that he has examined corporate or partnership infat�nation obtained from the jurisdiction under which the entity was created and presently Page l of 3 operates, that tle entity is current and active wn said State or jurisdiction, that the enti#y cs currently authorized to do business in the State of Florida, and identify the exact name and tide of the persons authorized :to ekeLX p to the instruments on behalf of that entity in conjunction with the conveyance of the subject real` rsonal property. Pursuant to Section 689.071, Florida Statutes, IF the record owner is trustee, the ::; ffiaat hall state that the Trustee has full power and authority to execute instruments of conveyance .oir el lf,; o the Trust a nd, if applicable, incorporate by reference and attach suppoi�ng documentation.)<:,� tftl .oprd owner is an individual, the A.fflant must state the marital status represented to the Affiant by�� he&46I v10(tual and, if mairiied, state whether the real property is or is not homestead property. If the drama&— titles being conveyed are located wholly within public right-of-way, the Affidavit should state ,1 t fact.] 5, Title to the subject drainage s tein(s) or to the County is not encumbere of record. II itle to the drainage system(s) oil; op I a; T s .. encumbered by the following rnstrL1L.e, s o► poi •tiot�(s} thei•eaf ai�dlar easement{s), if any, beij3g conveyer/ thereof and/or easements) being c©nveyed to the County is °ecord. 1. Mortgage (or Assignment of.,Ke eat a security interest against title tort ,conveyed to the County] to Mist n ` ne and recorded at C.R. Book i Pagf 2. UCC-I Financing Statement, recor0 Collier County. 3. UCC-i recorded with Florida Secret Book 11 , page to �'ro�ts} describe only recorded instruments that impress �tern(s) or partion(s) thereof andlar airy easement being i iortgagee(s)l , dated t seq., Public Records of Collier County. l O Book, Page _ , Public Records of Stab!,. yTallahassee (Leon County), Florida at O.R. ,aI '' ;,.. INSTRUCTION: The Affront must list each inert ` " si` al . n of rents and profits, iJCC-I (s)or other g 'It 11 security tlstrument that linpress a sec«iy interest tE�at could negatively affect conveyance of good title to the drainage.systern(s) or portion(s) thereof and/or easeiyiei ) ji ►Y, being conveyed to the County. If rnarke% le -title to the drainage system(s) or portion(s) thereof dfar oily easement(s) being conveyed is IF encumbered by any such recorded instrument, the Affiant shall 'd a the respective security instrument, including the book and fia t page where the security instrument has bee ,Tec orded. It is not necessary to 1.. attach a copy of any such document to the Affidavit, This Affidavit ;rod +sI s each security interest that is listed in the Owner's Affidavit, and each such security interest w. ,,..bb-bsubordinated..Do not list a ,. I\lotice of . Commencement or Reservation of �I'vlineral Rights, etc., bec, se :s�ich instruments do not negatively affect marketable .title to the drainage system(s) or portion(s) tl breof ` ndlor easements) bung coI onveyed to the County. If all of the drainage facilities being conveyed to t1 - I-ouy`°.. re located in public right-€�f way, do not list mortgages, etc., if they do not encumber after acquifg"ro_p that is located in public aright-af way. Claims asserted under Chapter 713, Florida Statutes, must be `firnserred to security?' pursuant to Section 713.24, Florida Statutes, or other adequate security acceptable_ to-`tl e unty Attomey st be provided to the County before the County will grant preliminary acc nee of title to such u nn foci lilies. 7. Affront further states that the information contained in this Affidavit is true, correct and curret�t as of the date this .Affidavit is given. [iNSfiRUC'I'IUiN: l.Jnless the time period is extended by staff far good cause ii1 the specif;e instance, per Ordinance, the date at'this A.ffidavEt should not be dated earlier than sixty (6a} days pri+�r to the subinittal Page 2 cif 3 OR 6045 PG 1904 of legal documents pertaining to Utility Conveyance to Cotner County, Engineering Services to conside� preliminary acceptalice of the subject drainage system(s) or Portion(s) thereof documents.] URTHE tF'i&NT S.AYFTH NAUGHT. ;,"." MMM Me P Me DATED this day of , 20 Attt�rneylAfftant's Simatur,,�`. ,sue. Attorney/Affiant's I�#arr3e`�:r.1� ��'- SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBEDr&r4b*r0*'fLIM MI Al n�e by means of 0 physical presence or d online notai•izafion, 'LF C. MMMMaMV* this day of �" t _ 20 by (name of attorney/affiiant making statement) who is ;....: �! personally known or 0 produced ��tv of Mentif cation roduced� as identification. Signature of Notary Public) '^,.;�� Printed or Typed Name eof Notary Public) R .> r, ` y one of rso re grin this instrument/ '' Prepared by.a..... Pe P p. g �.R th'. - [Address of person preparing this instrument] �: -- .; �*k_ . ^J: ff. o712021 Page 3 of 3 i �t1 F01'nt 4-Rev,OD (Utilities Facilities andlor Utilities Easemerrt(s} Subordination} ,:;,_ CLeave 3" space, b � nk space in upper tight hand comer for recording purposes] - � -. ; : V AA DRAIN -E. Yoe . 'ILITIES ANDICIR DRAINAGE + ASEI1El'�TT S SUBORDINATION J. _ 4 0 It At A +i THIS SUBDR.DIINATIO7, L :,dated this day of , Zo , by [Insert the complete and correct ILI rlalTl� of the Secure d P RIJ OF CO of the B C3A ty -see Instruction I�io. 11 (Hereinafter referred to as the "Secured €'arty"}, in favor IJI I ISSIONER.S OF COLLIER. COUNTY, FLORIDA, its successors I vt and assigns, {hereinafter• refer+e to as "County"}. as the context allows. .4 OIL Secured Patty as used herein includes singular or plural, V�ILREAS, the purpose of this Suba`�ti ,tort.;is to subordinate the Secured Parry's Security interests that encumber good, marketable title to'`thdY.1 Vtn_ bercd Drainage Eacilities andlor the related Drainage Easements} being conveyed to +Collier the underlying teal property that is enci s ecif ed in the below listed security instr and/ under 1�trl�i�ch Drainage. Facilities are located over, on y security interests in favor of the Secured Pa•ty asAAA wnI'11�EA, the Secured Party is the owner• a o.idet, of Rents and Profits, UCC- i *, etc. ], recorded in 0. J, to I�ublic Records of Collier County, Florida, [and i.� P recorded at O.R. Book, Page et seq., Public Recor [NOTE: *UCC- l s are usually subordinated by UCC-3s. County, insert the hook, Page and place (usually rI'allal UCC-3l. � a �,�ortgage or Assignment L cot•ds Book ,Page r, �e1, as amended by a r`+falliet• County, Florida.; and for UCC-3 is recorded outside of Collier SSE f tl recordation of each such UCC- IAA or V�IIEREA.S, the Secured Party is also the owner and bolder o�`'a-- ,recorded at O.R. gawk, page et seq,, Public Records of Collier Coun �iIflofida, as amended by a recorded at O.R. Book, Page ___R_ et, seq�,� ubli Records of Collier County, l lorida; and h �VI-iEREA.S, each above-t•eferenced Security tnstt•ttment grants to this Secp`�.cd.'pty,,a security Interest tat encumbers ood and tnarketal�le title to the Irlcumbered Drainage Facil`te� 3 g �cotiveyed to Collier g County, and/or encumbers the related Drainage Easer•nent(s), rtfany, also bettZgtAI;Ac,ney to Collier County, which Drainage Facilities have been constructed within such easement(s) and aisle tag fir,: n and/or over the . All underlying real property; and '. �. ; ,ILA 'ite to the conveyance of the Drainage Facilities anti/or related Drainage Easements, VVT3EI2 AS, prerequis ifany, being conveyed to the County, Collier County requires that this Secured Party must subordinate only its Security Interests in (i) the Encumbered Drainage Facilities being conveyed to the County and (ii) each related Drainage Easements}, if any, being conveyed to the County; and the Secured Party is hereby complying with said request for these subordination(s), 14 OVY, THEREFORE, in consideration of TE%I DOLLARS ($ I O.oO) and other goad and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged by the Secured Patty, the Secured Patty hereby subordinates its security+ interests in MU E KiLIM eI Drainage Facilities being conveyed to Collier County, andlor to each Drainage Easement(s), if any, being conveyed to the County, which encumbered Drainage Page 1 of 9 Facilities are located over, on andl viLI Ithe d%MOO I I ed underlying real property, l✓xcept as expressly subordinated lieren, the Secured interests of the Secured Party remain in full force and effect. IN WITNE EO' the Secured Party has causaed this Subordination to be executed the date and yeah first ai�ove �vt _correct witness at�d signature black - see Instruction No. 3� ledgtnent a.rtd notary block -see Insttuction h€o. �] prepared by: [Insert natne�aFI V49 IN CI�IU'T'E: Upon request, Caun,f taf,Nr. address of the individual who prepared this Subordittatian� n7�zoz t ovide examples of properly executed Sctbordinations�, Page 2 of 2 •p& •! .. IF A OF imxnlDli tz ;Ott- •�4 V FF T41 OF to 4 f For Ar OF FF f�roject: PARCEL: 1=olio No.: as "Grantor: , to whose mailing < Attorney, Suite It DRAIC�iAGE EASElU1ENT �MENT, made and entered into this day of $ 20, by , whose mailing address is , (hereinafter referred to COLLIER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, dress % is 3299 Tamiami Trail East, cIo the Office of the County i, aRs, Florida 34112 (hereinafter referred to as "Grantee"). ever use t �herei he terms "Grantor" and "Grantee" include all the parties to (Wher Ill this instrument an;th-eir,, �q,sectiv'e heirs, legal representatives, successors and assigns. Grantor and G' �, ale used for singular or plural, as the context requires.) to +°ollw;�IPIAW Teri l `I E S S E T t t to or - It r t '`� , Grantor, for and in con consideration paid by the Grt� acknowledged, hereby convey"; perpetual, non-exclusive drainage drainage structures and facilities, on "Of TEhI DOLLARS ($10.00) and other valuable 'he= receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby rt. #bargains and sells unto the Grantee, a m of o enter upon and to install and maintain p 1ui : �, not limited to ditches, berms ri -ra and retaining wall s s ur�erground pipes, and p p g y water control structures over, under,, u o nd :.,roes the following Collier Florida,to wit: ;w. located in y,. See attached Exhi incorporated herei Subject tc� easements, restrictions, a THIS HoluiESTEAD TO NA1lE AiyC TO H�3LD the same unto the Granteet#Q - �t la d and to lace and/or excavate malelow enter upon said n p constructing, operating, and maintaining drainage facilities,,._ thte includes the right to remove and use any and all excavated that r 6I. that Grantor has received full compensation for all impravern+�n easement area, including, but not limited to, . The eas-o, shall constitute an easement running with the land and shall burden above. swales, earthen various types of described lands �r with the right to �r the purpose of is easement Tie;parties record lava d within the e ' rated herein ll it e lams escribed Jlow IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has caused these presents to be execu�i date and year first above written. `'� , V1l1TNESSES: (Signature) (print Dame} (Signature) 0 (Print Name} W1l1TNESSES: Print Name` , STATE OF COUNTY OF l IF The foregoing Draina a E�as'd`ine-nt h sical presence or Lj online'. F` a by is persona produced identity. STATE t'� F COUN?'Y OF lly knqwn to me (affiX notarial seal) �.�s acknowledged before me by means of (� ;ion who day of , v. (Si (Prin# IV as proof of �`'o� �otary Public) ry Public} Serial l Carn�sior�: any}; My Cor�rnission fires. . -.. r: -IF The foregoing Draina a Easement vas acknowledged before 17 sical resence ar �] online notariaafion this day of , r me ■ is personally known to me _. praduce� as proof of identity. (affix notarial seas) {Signature of Notary Public) (Print Name of Notary Public) Serial I Gornrnission # cif anyj: Gash Revised: 06/26/18 k* oR 6045 PG 1910 *** Approued as to form and �egati#y: Assistartou Attorney a ;t '. k eve t t iu'iy Camrriission expires: Lest �tevlsed: t}5f26l18 UL+= Growth Management Community Development Department Please complete the following and upload via the CityView Portal with your submittal. Items marked with (*jolt; required for every application, other items are optional and may not apply to every project. Forms are valid for 6 months following their submittal; an updated form will be required for a new submittal after that timeframe and any time the properties within the project boundary are modified. Additional documents may be attached to this form and can include: * LOCATION MAP and/or SURVEY showing the proposed project boundary. List of additional folio numbers and associated legal descriptions. E-mail from Addressing Official for any pre -approved project and/or street names. *FOLIO (Property ID) Numbers) of subject property or properties. [Attach list if necessary] 37742840009,37744000009 & 37742880001 *LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties. [Attach list if necessary] Section 27, Township 48S, Range 27E STREET ADDRESS(ES) where applicable, if already assigned. 37742880001 - 13062 Immokalee Road Acceptance of this form does not constitute project and/or street name approval and is subject to further review by the Addressing Official. Pre -Approval may be requested by contacting us at GMD_Addressing�colliercountyfl.gov or 239-252-2482 prior to your submittal. CURRENT PROJECT NAME Immokalee Randall CPUD PROPOSED STREET NAME(s) LATEST APPROVED PROJECT NUMBER [e.g., SDP-94-##, PPL-2002-AR-####, PL2017000####] Addressing Checklist (Rev 10/2022) Operations &Regulatory Management Division • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive •Naples, FL 34104 • 239-252-2400 www.colliercountyfl.gov Page 1 of 1 Parcel No ' 37742840009 Name /Address GM ADVISORS LLC 434 TERRACINA CT City ;NAPLES C Alier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Site _._._..._1......."..._.....too ;...—__..._.._ a4.__....._......_.._.........I Site City NAPLES State FL Site Zone *Note 34120 Zip 34119 i Map No. Strap No. � Section Township Range Acres *Estimated _ ........ too ._..._...._.._..........._..r..........._.._......_..................._.........._..........._.._....._..._......_...._..............._......................................._................._._.,..........................._......._....._....._......................._......_..._.._.............._...._..........................._1....._...........i 3C27 332800 35 03C27 27 48 27 2.9 ..............r.........._..........................._...............__...................................._..............._.._................,........._..........._.._... .._..............._.........._..............._.._....,.._................................................................................._.. .........................................................................................................._.................._................................................................_............._. _...................I....1.1.............I.1......1 _ _......._... _. _....... Legal GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 23 TR 35 LESS THAT PORTION FOR R/W DESC IN OR 3100 PG 2570 0014allo _................................_.._..............._.........._.._...................................................................._.............._.........._..._............................,...................................._.............................._...................._..................._.............................................._............. .........................._.................. ! Sub./Condo ? 332800 - GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 23 ,........_ . ..... .^1 ... . Use Code 0 ; 0 - VACANT RESIDENTIAL Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Millage Area 0 11290 Millage Rates t1M *Calculations School � Other Total i 4.459 8.7542 i 13.2132 lott"I ........... _.. .................. ........._........... :..._..............._.........................._ ..1................;..._....I......._.....'It .............. _..4.4.... .. ............�. ..... 2022 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Date hook -Page � Amount 04/30/20 5758-1422 $ 260,000 03/09/98 ` 2395-3318 $ 20,500 Land Value (+) Improved Value (_) Market Value (-) 10% Cap (_) Assessed Value (_) School Taxable Value (_) Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll $ 139,200 $0 $ 139,200 $ 48,285 $ 90,915 $ 139,200 $ 90,915 Collier County Property Appraiser ............................... Parcel No ; 37744000009 ress 'GM ADVISORS LLC j 434 TERRACINA CT City � NAPLES Map No. 3C27 ................................................................... Strap No. 332800 53 03C27 Property Summary Site City NAPLES Section 27 State FL ...........................0.I.91111................._....I.I..................I...... Township Range .._......__ ........................ ... ......... _;........................._........._...._.._.._................. ......... 48 27 Site Zane *Nate 34120 Zip 34119 Acres *Estimated ..................................._..v ......_.......... ......................................................................................................................... 3.75 Legal GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 23 TR 53 LESS THAT PORTION FOR R/W DESC IN OR 3100 PG 2577 .................................................................._......................._......to ....._........_............................................_..........................................._.,...at ......_.................................................._..............._..................._.._................to ........................,........,...._.._..........................................................._............................� ......__.._.._.....__.._.................... _...".................................._._.......................................................1-11111. _I I .....I. 4.1111.. ._.. I . Millage Area f j 290 Millage Rates 0 *Calculations ! Sub./Condo 1332800 - GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 23 School Other Total _ . Use Code 0' 0 at VACANT RESIDENTIAL 4.459 E 8.7542 ! 13*2132 Date 01/17/20 12/27/19 09/22/97 ` 10/01/78 Latest Sales History 2022 Certified Tax Roll (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) (Subject to Change) .. 4 1. Ill, ..._......_ ......_........__..._....._ ._... 4..._.......................................V ............._ .........._........ _.._...... .. ........ ..........._.............I.._ ..........................._.._..........._........................... I.........._....to ... 'It ._............ _..............._..........__...._... IV. ..._...I ..........._......... Book -Page Amount Land Value 57.9-1011 $ 0 (+) Improved Value 57121wV54*7 $ 3500000 (_) Market Value 2348-2582 $ 24,000 775-1651 $ 0 () 10% Cap (_) Assessed Value (=) School Taxable Value (_) Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll $ 165,220 $0 $ 165,220 $ 57,266 $ 107,954 $ 165,220 $ 107,954 Parcel No ; 37744000009 ress 'GM ADVISORS LLC j 434 TERRACINA CT City � NAPLES Map No. 3C27 ................................................................... Strap No. 332800 53 03C27 Property Summary Site City NAPLES Section 27 State FL ...........................0.I.91111................._....I.I..................I...... Township Range .._......__ ........................ ... ......... _;........................._........._...._.._.._................. ......... 48 27 Site Zane *Nate 34120 Zip 34119 Acres *Estimated ..................................._..v ......_.......... ......................................................................................................................... 3.75 Legal GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 23 TR 53 LESS THAT PORTION FOR R/W DESC IN OR 3100 PG 2577 .................................................................._......................._......to ....._........_............................................_..........................................._.,...at ......_.................................................._..............._..................._.._................to ........................,........,...._.._..........................................................._............................� ......__.._.._.....__.._.................... _...".................................._._.......................................................1-11111. _I I .....I. 4.1111.. ._.. I . Millage Area f j 290 Millage Rates 0 *Calculations ! Sub./Condo 1332800 - GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 23 School Other Total _ . Use Code 0' 0 at VACANT RESIDENTIAL 4.459 E 8.7542 ! 13*2132 Date 01/17/20 12/27/19 09/22/97 ` 10/01/78 Latest Sales History 2022 Certified Tax Roll (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) (Subject to Change) .. 4 1. Ill, ..._......_ ......_........__..._....._ ._... 4..._.......................................V ............._ .........._........ _.._...... .. ........ ..........._.............I.._ ..........................._.._..........._........................... I.........._....to ... 'It ._............ _..............._..........__...._... IV. ..._...I ..........._......... Book -Page Amount Land Value 57.9-1011 $ 0 (+) Improved Value 57121wV54*7 $ 3500000 (_) Market Value 2348-2582 $ 24,000 775-1651 $ 0 () 10% Cap (_) Assessed Value (=) School Taxable Value (_) Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll $ 165,220 $0 $ 165,220 $ 57,266 $ 107,954 $ 165,220 $ 107,954 Collier County Property App Property Summary Parcel No: 37742880001 Site A dress 13062 IMMOKALEE RD _.._......._.._.._..._......_.........._......_..._..___........................................................................._.._.............._..............._..........*Disclai►ner,......................................................._.............._.......».._......._......_............._..............., _..........._......._.._.._......._._..........'........_................_._..........................._..............._.............................................................................................._..........._......_..........._................................_..........._......._.._..............................._......_......._.._....................... Name AddressCOLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S8 raiser Site City NAPLES Site Zane *Note 34120 . ...._............................_.._......._.._.._.._........._.................._.to........_._............_.........._........................ _......I...... I.... ..............._..............-................... ...................... ...... ......... ...... _ ............._........... _.........................._..I................................................._.............._........._.................. _..........._.............._...._.._............._.................................._.... City NAPLES State FL Zip 34104-4961 It II +64 o ...»..........................._..........................._....................._............................_................................................... ........................_..........._..............................................._I........... _.._......_. .._.._..... .,....... ,......... II1.................. ..._.. ......_.. ..... ..... .. ... .. Map No. ' Strap No. Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3C27 332800 36 3C27 27 48 27 3979 _...,........•._............ __.........._...................................._..................................... _...........I....... I ...........4........................_..... _._.....__..............._..............._.........................._....................................._....................................................._.............._.......".........................................................»..I............. . _... . Legal GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 23 TR 36 _....._..............._........ .......... ........ _....._........_ ._...--_ ... 1.11.....1_ ........ _ ...._ ._ ........_ .._......._............................_.................... __.......... .. . ............ ...:. Millage Area 01290 Millage Rates 0 *Calculations i ..................._.............._.............I.1............. Sub./Condo 1332800 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 23 School Other ; Total Use Code 0 86 - COUNTIES INCLUDING NON -MUNICIPAL GOV. 1 4.459 8.7542 13.2132 Latest Sales History 2022 Certified Tax Roll (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) (Subject to Change) ._.._......._ ..................................... »......... _.......__»._........._.._......__....,.....»..._..._...._.....,....................»......._.......... ........_......._.... ......_ ....._._.........._ ......_.................._.................................._.......4._I ......................... ......... ....... ... DateBook -Page � Amount � .. ......._..........n........._.........................._................__._............................_........_..181,920 . -.... ` Lad Value $ f � ... 08/30/02 3100-2570 $ 0 ' O ue Improved Val $ 0 03/16/98 2398-1355 i $ 20,0 _ 00 _ _ 1 () Market Value 181,920 02/01 /74 731-645 $ 0 _ _ ... - (-) 10% Cap $ 127,407 1 (_) Assessed Value E $ 54,513 (_) School Taxable Value $ 0 (_) Taxable Value 0'• If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll I ' , il hh ",A!x k ka to r�. AISM9 ` r�oiAIAo i, d A t .t„€' v t "III i t 1 iof 0AA 1 w k;� d' ,rr:if 4+�,.. ,' s,� iFeA ,, A* g•yr or r fit' :;ro 3. ' r '%yt� yJ a, ;l Vkfo o. '° a ' ,, Uc } , e `: I,�: '" ''b"•#"s ° of g i. skr' f >,. �'sx 6� , 5" tY'€rAw f" KA k' sol of R F 4'IV rI r �" ir t . , t FAt A ,,. �,v . s+'fy zi 3 ,I I,to VIArrD�i aIF, a I Y s t I tok iP "0'N^ y1 tr ` j il r t i ,t$I Is { Ma _ r i to • r f ., 4 1 4� s, i ,`.. # i. a .t ` $y"x n " A r. 4 , A t` Z T} .a 1 t. Dtoo - At V$ < t ' of : ata D •"h DS F'. t *y . s , it tt I It a, €a9., A. ,roe "a;<� :' J, 5- 4I `�' i A t: l 4Q, . 1 Ali III A r%ra ,r 4P** `4s }a.. '`'tt 41 M r *• ,A, �:Ty€ `;€ a, v A AI " r _.- :,. .1 _AA ' �` - �� " a.11 �' * ' ,�,4, 0 `' iA ", Itoa f} l y a y x s 4 .t'+' , v Al I to I z } 8or 4� } f .. ' t 1 , I I I k of I.I t ,.►. ., r... s _ FAtAl ,d D�;VA `oI ' tF arm'€ 4 , v Q Y i ,A I rat'. g. All Y ,4 k eI i J f» €,.$`"OPe"A Y ;"� r- _.� iA,mVH r sDr I 4 a x,I , ,4•, to A 1 I7* Vol Vol h IQ ' >rtoo, 11 r A A el' of sriF r, " rit ` ;; ram 4 ANa s 1 ?� k 'r •:i I, �.y r k k All • t < n S" * tom. € Yt . ,,.�, m I to '� 5' ' III ,ryv�... I_T 3V Aix 11 , 0 A ) lo � * A I to, A I I - A; I � I 0 A o�!V Q I �� t� 4� .+ a x w{ ,k '" + e vw s-yr� 4 a I,�; 11 xVol r 4'` r c. ', r �. 4 .g t+ t o s to f i I `4 t r ; v N *! xe^ f`Av Rv or A % `t S i11 ' 14o 1 'r +7' I � x I r A { s } „+ f a 4 it xf Af 1i +" 4 At �; #h% trD yto "x��i „yc ..? . A , . n , ffi err j ... o- 4.mrE ✓ 4�":pme, +At e ,'a 11 41 it > ; e.,� , F S% ` t o :{�4" k ,; s• c w` t ft .. ,"' �e' y 6 •e ,w. Z �f ; 2< y - ttAo t '. f f`At WA,Aw A too, Al IA AtIt tAt VIA .try. apw.� g 1»¢�P a t "F011 Y :n r #y.:s3 ' i. " A 8; S, t L y , »: 0 to t.a ... �,, , A I A r-�'r'fi6""`f§ '8g'�' ' ';. a D } :"d y ;, {1. . Y- ac +y' £< a� - Ato °s " "'A € .r,Yk 3�{ r' r,.cc..er<,.§€� *yam y h ... 4#js 4 !:P t,`' ' V r '6 tkf ik f .f� 56 tot s Al .'€'� Dtilsti �. 'xiL'=.r: 33'.sr�*s� ^' .✓ it Ali ft AAA or ` I t I+ '. q hflt'�g 4.a .ems '=r' .i!* , s,4 t Pe o •o% »I :'*" 60, � � sty, y ' W r k s{ .e+� F, r. ',. ,� ..IT t ,• 1r IV 4 'IYk t A k. lot + t r 11 r °i x t .' y Al At i A t 'st r If It* r A AAl t �_ A ,,, •' 4 iz ti i - - € r tI tll t t il too 10 SS � , v t. nv rr o s �f V T•; t t k 7. At Y oa + r jy {'}j, +..Ito� t ; r F h r t y,s s I .'•3 IV IV ; f r Y 1 tin t,. It a F % A. l 1 �{» AAA » . a• , I t Fg I .. , • " III y { - 4 At I ��'iX rr','.• _ t t D I . " �: r,<+ ,F" e r 3 "1. 4 ` € D` x A ? I le I � ,4 0 Q� A A A f I P, t , f � I 0 AA I I I A A A I (A , ao 14L I A il 94 q3L:A.A*%Wv ,,*A , 4- ,AAA A I l I I I I q 0 A It , A ' • i t . �€ r I ; r At A A : . A A A A 1 4 i if I I I . io� ,I A li I k.ro "e r.,.A"6, _ , , fyy , ' 4.4 Y Il o 11 y �{i ' If A. ..Alto W.r,.k.. __.�.G....e,f543e ioo45:v..... Al vv. AI ... {wrt s.�"'"—`..�...F iMa.I! IV ._ .tom(�. x ,�E . ag n. ,. 4.vY^.v�9 .4/�� W n y „ x 9 r 4 EPt • , t t 1 , r 1 ,� � � � '.DPI�.'� ��� 4 r , fr S r� D84 / if �` .' D1 f7s'€fix- I it " !U ilioommoSrI `4 ytl s ulgiAlo�, r". :r t k i' �' ', Ei- A $ i s t t . �F �" ''"� �' All, 4 At ? + �. 4 04•AS. IV f ' ' r y. a 4t 3C 0. t t .l , §i > • • r-.. 18 m g . ' r".. ;1 s 5 8 e lo A Al :.. xr fi 'r tj ,� rat r,, t£ `4 % ,,gg t� ., 'f 4 f y r Ir t .�'"t $_ is r to dt' ar<a`.a`,a •3^ j r s_. �r mm►c 9 �t� 7 j�A II A P 4 x $ r I y am y�. Ator ,4 , ' 3s°x .«. D.?.rr.,�k. { •.;�At ;k'$r�1. 3 F r .. Ate. y �+A At > At I of A ; . j.. I a 4 3Al Q 4IV M, k If } i N Fit r 'k a" . f + G 4 . 4 `dOv Al !• N v I t z fr fto,• io^. .4 ..r. D 4 x. A, A 4A r ,� 1 •, At .;r. tI: , I �� ?� t Ou ts... 4't < * f A. I r-z.,_r��s. Rk "#...,AT'�ff�^��#• .:� y}w "` Pr,F'at�'f�i i W I lopol Tj . 1 APPLICATION FOR A REQUEST TO AMEND THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN APPLICATION NUMBER DATE RECEIVED PRE -APPLICATION CONFERENCE DATE DATE SUFFICIENT This application, with all required supplemental data and information, must be completed and accompanied by the appropriate fee, and returned to the Growth Management Department, Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104. 239-252- 2400. The application must be reviewed by staff for sufficiency within 30 calendar days following the filing deadline before it will be processed and advertised for public hearing. The applicant will be notified in writing, of the sufficiency determination. If insufficient, the applicant will have 30 days to remedy the deficiencies. For additional information on the processing of the application, see Resolution 97-431 as amended by Resolution 98-18 (both attached) . If you have any questions, please contact the Comprehensive Planning Section at 239-252-2400. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS I. GENERAL INFORMATION A. Name of Applicant Michel M. Saadeh, MGR Company GM Advisors, LLC Address 434 Terracina Court City Naples State FL Phone Number N/A Name of Applicant Collier Coun Fax Number N Zip Code 341 19 Transportation Right-of-Wa Address 2885 Horseshoe Drive South City Naples State FL Zip Code 34104 Phone Number N/A B. Name of Agent Robert J. MUlhere, F Fax Number N/A for Vi • THIS WILL BE THE PERSON CONTACTED FOR ALL BUSINESS RELATED TO THE PETITION. Company He M olontes Address 950 Enco An Compan City Naples State Florida Phone Number 239-254-2( Zip Code 341 10 Fax Number 239-254-2099 C. Name of Owner (s) of Record See Exhibit "I.C" Warranty D D. Name, Address and Qualifications of additional planners, architects, engineers, environmental consultants and other professionals providing information contained in this application. 1 H:\2023\2023025\WP\GMPA\Resubmittal\SSGMPA Application (rev 7-25-2023).doc Norman J. TrebilCOCk, AICP, P.E., President Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, P.A. 1205 Piper Blvd., Suite 202, Naples, FL 34110 Telephone: 239-566-9551 Email: ntrebilcock@trebilcock.biz Nicholas Pearson, Senior Biologist Turrell Hall & Associates, Inc. 3584 Exchange Avenue Naples, FL 34104 Telephone: 239-643-0166 Email: Nick@thanaples.com Russ Weyer, President Real Estate Econometrics, Inc. 707 Orchid Drive, Suite 100 Naples, FL 34102 Telephone: 239-269-1341 Email: Rweyer@ree-i.com II. Disclosure of Interest Information: See attached Disclosure of Interest Form A. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, Tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest. (Use additional sheets if necessary). Name and Address Percentage of Ownership B. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each. Name and Address Percentage of Stock C. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest. Name and Address Percentage of Interest D. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners. Name and Address Percentage of Ownership E. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners. Not Applicable Name and Address Date of Contract: 2 H:\2023\2023025\WP\GMPA\Resubmittal\SSGMPA Application (rev 7-25-2023).doc Percentage of Ownership F. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust. Not Applicable Name and Address G. Date subject property acquired (X): 1 /17/20, 4/30/20, 8/30/02 Term of lease yrs./mos. If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate date of option: and date option terminates: , or anticipated closing: H. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. III. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: A. LEGAL DESCRIPTION See Exhibit "I.C" Warranty Deeds B. GENERAL LOCATION South of Immokalee Rd. Immokalee Rd & Randall Blvd C. PLANNING COMMUNITY Rural Estates E. SIZE IN ACRES 9.84± imately rox773 ft west of the intersection of D . TAZ 2729 F. ZONING Estates G. SURROUNDING LAND USE PATTERN See Exhibit "V.B.I " Future Land Use Map H. FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESI(',NATIONS) Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP), Rural Estates Sub -Element, Estates Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict IV. TYPE OF REQUEST: A. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN ELEMENT (S) TO BE AMENDED: Housing Element Recreation/Open Space Traffic Circulation Sub -Element Mass Transit Sub -Element Aviation Sub -Element Potable Water Sub -Element Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element NGWAR Sub -Element Solid Waste Sub -Element Drainage Sub -Element Capital Improvement Element CCME Element Future Land Use Element X Golden Gate Master Plan Immokalee Master Plan B. AMEND PAGE(S) iii and 17 — AS FOLLOWS: Use Strikee thr�1 �rh to identify language to be deleted; Use Underline to identify language to be added). Attach additional pages if necessary: See Exhibit "IV.B.1" GMP Text Amendment C. AMEND FUTURE LAND USE MAP(S) DESIGNATION FROM Residential Estates Subdistrict to Immokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict D. AMEND OTHER MAP (S) AND EXHIBITS AS FOLLOWS: See Exhibit "IV.D. l " Immokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict E. DESCRIBE ADDITIONAL CHANGES REQUESTED: N/A 3 H:\2023\2023025\WP\GMPA\Resubmittal\SSGMPA Application (rev 7-25-2023).doc V. REQUIRED INFORMATION: NOTE: ALL AERIALS MUST BE AT A SCALE OF NO SMALLER THAN I"=400'. At least one copy reduced to 8-1/2 x 1 1 shall be provided of all aerials and/or maps. A. LAND USE Exh. V.A. ] Provide general location map showing surrounding developments (PUD, Exh. V.A.2 DRI's, existing zoning) with subject property outlined. Provide most recent aerial of site showing subject boundaries, source, and date. Exh. V.A.3 Provide a map and summary table of existing land use and zoning within a radius of 300 feet from boundaries of subject property. Exh. V.B.1 Provide map of existing Future Land Use Designations) of subject property and adjacent lands, with acreage totals for each land use designation on the subject property. C. ENVIRONMENTAL Exh. V.C.1 Provide most recent aerial and summary table of acreage of native habitats and soils occurring on site. HABITAT IDENTIFICATION MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH THE FDOT-FLORIDA LAND USE, COVER AND FORMS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (FLUCCS CODE). NOTE: THIS MAY BE INDICATED ON SAME AERIAL AS THE LAND USE AERIAL IN "A" ABOVE. Exh. V.C.2 Provide a summary table of Federal (US Fish & Wildlife Service) and State (Florida Game & Freshwater Fish Commission) listed plant and animal species known to occur on the site and/or known to inhabit biological communities similar to the site (e.g. panther or black bear range, avian rookery, bird migratory route, etc.) . Identify historic and/or archaeological sites on the subject property. D. GROWTH MANAGEMENT Reference 9J-11.006, F.A.C. and Collier County's Capital Improvements Element Policy 1.1.2 (Copies attached). l . INSERT "Y" FOR YES OR "N" FOR NO IN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING: N Is the proposed amendment located in an Area of Critical State Concern? (Reference 9J-11.006(1) (a) (5), F.A.C.). If so, identify area located in ACSC. N Is the proposed amendment directly related to a proposed Development of Regional Impact pursuant to Chapter 380 F.S. ? (Reference 9J-1 1.006(1) (a)7.a, F.A.C.) N Is the proposed amendment directly related to a proposed Small Scale Development Activity pursuant to Subsection 163.3187 (1)(c), F.S. ? (Reference 9J-1 1.006(1) (a)7.b, F.A.C.) N Does the proposed amendment create a significant impact in population which is defined as a potential increase in County -wide population by more than 5% of population projections? (Reference Capital Improvement Element Policy 1.1.2). If yes, indicate mitigation measures being proposed in conjunction with the proposed amendment. Exh. V.D.I Does the proposed land use cause an increase in density and/or intensity to the uses permitted in a specific land use designation and district identified (commercial, industrial, etc.) or is the proposed land use a new land use designation or district? (Reference Rule 9J-5.006(5) F.A.C.). If so, provide data and analysis to support the suitability of land for the proposed use, and of environmentally sensitive land, ground water and natural resources. (Reference Rule 9J-1 1.007, F.A.C.) 4 H:\2023\2023025\WP\GMPA\Resubmittal\SSGMPA Application (rev 7-25-2023).doc E. PUBLIC FACILITIES I. Exh. V.E.I Provide the existing Level of Service Standard (LOS) and document the Exh. V.E.I Exh. V.E.I Exh. V.E.3 Exh. V.E.I Exh. V.E.I Exh. V.E.I impact the proposed change will have on the following public facilities: Potable Water Sanitary Sewer Arterial & Collector Roads; Name specific road and LOS See TIS Drainage Solid Waste Parks: Community and Regional If the proposed amendment involves an increase in residential density, or an increase in intensity for commercial and/or industrial development that would cause the LOS for public facilities to fall below the adopted LOS, indicate mitigation measures being proposed in conjunction with the proposed amendment. (Reference Capital Improvement Element Objective 1 and Policies) 2. Exh. V.E.2 Provide a map showing the location of existing services and public facilities that will serve the subject property (i.e. water, sewer, fire protection, police protection, schools and emergency medical services. 3. Exh. V.E.I Document proposed services and public facilities, identify provider, and describe the effect the proposed change will have on schools, fire protection and emergency medical services. F. OTHER Identify the following areas relating to the subject property: Exh. V.F.I Flood zone based on Flood Insurance Rate Map data (FIRM). N Location of wellfields and cones of influence, if applicable. (Identified on Collier County Zoning Maps) N Traffic Congestion Boundary, if applicable N Coastal Management Boundary, if applicable N High Noise Contours (65 LDN or higher) surrounding the Naples Airport, if applicable (identified on Collier County Zoning Maps) . G. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION N $16,700.00 non-refundable filing fee made payable to the Board of County Commissioners due at time of submittal. (Plus proportionate share of advertising costs) Y $9,000.00 non-refundable filing fee for a Small Scale Amendment made payable to the Board of County Commissioners due at time of submittal. (Plus proportionate share of advertising costs) Y Proof of ownership (copy of deed) Y Notarized Letter of Authorization if Agent is not the Owner (See attached form) Y I Original and 5 complete, signed applications with all attachments including maps, at time of submittal. After sufficiency is completed, 25 copies of the complete application will be required. * If you have held apre-application meeting and paid the pre -application fee of $500.00 at the meeting, deduct that amount from the above application fee amount when submitting your application. All pre -application fees are included in the total application submittal fee. Otherwise * Maps shall include: North arrow, name and location of principal roadways and shall be at a scale of 1" = 400' or at a scale as determined during the pre -application meeting. 5 H:\2023\2023025\WP\GMPA\Resubmittal\SSGMPA Application (rev 7-25-2023).doc ZLERK OF •URT AND COMPTROLLER • •/ 111 11 5/1/2020 4:00 PM PAGES 3 COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA This deed prepared by; Robert Rogers, Esq. 75 linevards Blvd, Na p es PL 34119 OF oo ..,. 'Are PArcet tD Number: 37742 AAt ctual consideration paid is S 2 • This Indenture, Elvin Torres, a marri of the Count}of Cook GM Advisors LLC, a EXHIBIT I.0 y of April , 2 0 2 0 A.D. , I3et�veen and Pascual Torres, a married. man Florida' ;`im twe ted state of liability whose address is: 4 3 4 Terraeina Ct . , -r`�. �:N Footit ' I. 4 of the County of Collier ''; .*e ::w,,. Witnesseth that the GRANTORS, for and in consideration 6e e;:sul.) .of: DOL VS FL 34119 and other good and valuable consideration to t; RANTORS in °pia}�d / '�: granted, bargained and said to the said CJRANTEC and GRANTEC'� heirs, li 4. Illinois company scare of Florida grantors, gx-antee. and ��_,..._..._____.........._................_....____ DOLLARS, GRANTCE, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, have tctssors and assigns forever, the following described land, situate, lying and being in the County of`5tlate of Florida to wit: No. 23, according to the ;� 9 , Public Records of :+o road right-of-way Vie` `2570, Public Records of AAA ti•. all tenements, hereditaments a appurtenances thereto in anywise appertaining . t',=JE;;_' ti . TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the same in fee simple fore-wv•r--,.�, I'16Y Subject to current taxes, easements and restrictit�ns�f, `'record. A .Y • -;4.. I r E SUBJECT TO ad valorem and non -ad valorem real property' t, , s subsequent to 2020, zoning, building code and other use srictions imposed by governmental authority; outstanding oil, gas,=anc� mineral interests of records, if any; and restrictions, reservations and easements common to the subdivision; provided, however, that none of them shall prevent the use of the property for residential purposes. All of Tract 35, plat thereof as Collier County, Golden Gate Estates, ''�ti- recorded in Plat Book -?,,.`• Florida, LESS that porn to 11 described in Official Records Book 3100 Collier County, Florida. TOGETHER with belonging or Grantor warrants that at the time of this conveyance, the property is not the Grantor's homestead within the meaning in the constitution of the state of Florida, nor is it con or a part of homestead property, (Continued on Attached} subject set forth tiguous to and the grantors do hereby fully warrant tl7e title to said land, and will defend the same against lawful claims of all ne�ons �vhamsaever. l.ay�r(icncr�ucd by y� L>ist�lny Systems, �f1C,. 2(1?U (Rl�3) 7G3-5ii5 Form I�111'[)-.', oR 5758 PG 1423 Warranty Deed _ rage a Parcel ID Number: 37742840009 In 'Witness Whe Signed, s Printed Name: Witnes tors hove hereunto set their bands and se:�ls the clay and r presence: COUNTY OF al ! fir' The foregoing instnu»ent was acknowledged before m�'<134 ,4`i notarization, this 3 0 th day of Apri 1 Elvin Torres, a married man and`4 who have produced their Notary Public State of Fionda Wendy M Humphrey My Cammiss[on GG 959958 Expires 02/19/2024 Torres dress: 332 first .1bov�.� written. nsueola Ave., Chicago, Pascual Torres` l'.O. Address: 3327 W Pensacola Ave., Chicago, IL 60618 physical presence or Torres, a married .: 5 `:�MIu�r4fnu.�hMT/�� l GMA-DTOF2R Lax�rt;�»urntcd by �_' [:)i�ph�y �iystcros, lnc., �t)?Il (R���i) 7G;�-SijS harm f��.Wt>-? rr* OR 5758 PG 1424 *** Warranty veeu "Page 3 P�rcel ID Number: 37742840009 LasrrCitncrt+ted by �.' L)i,)�►ny Svtitrtm, Inc.. FU?U (Kf,a) 7f+.i-iij3 f���rtn 1�11�'U-_' INSTR 5818503 OR 5719 CLERK PG OF • . F• ! $0.70 i • 1 /1 1011 RECORDED 1/22/2020 1:11 PM PAGES 2 AND COMPTROLLER, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA 'Y'his Documtnt Prepared by; Robert Rogers, Esq. 75 Vineyards Blvd, Napples FL 3411TIN 9 t239j 353wl973 lip Nil IN Parctl 1D Numbtr: 332 op, Quitclaim This Quitclaim Deed, RCAMS Advisers, ,9I t12 ,- Made this day of , A.D.pit , LLC , - 1`°rich limited liability company of the County of Collier GM Advisors, LLC, a State of Florida Florin, -_� ' ted li.abila.ty company �N ,4I '44fI. " - Ott whose address is: 7 6 7 5 SANTA MARCHER T,A4 4A. Naples, FL 34109 of the County of C011xex - - `�<: Witnesseth that the GRANTOR, for and in Ofwli si>�rri ,a:,, _r►ir.rww_ww_____www.rww�w_wTEN DOL ' '. � and other good and valuable consideration to GRANTOR lhand. p ai granted, bargained and quitclaimed to the said GRANTEE and GRArpi I l S t` Florida State of Between grantor, grantee. 1 oI �ww__wwwww...w DOLLARS by GRANTEE, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has ems, successors and assigns forever, the following described land, situate, g County INN' --X. - lying and bean in the Coun of j= State of Florida to wit: All of Tract 53, Golden Gate Estate`,;.°t No. 23, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book ? .;; ,..ge 9 , of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, LWNS . EXCEPTING THEREFROM that parcel described in Order of Taking as ,:.. e*��d ook 3100 Page 2577 PublicRecordsof . "0`411 PO dinOfficialRecords r County, Florida. To Have and to Hold the same together with all and singular the appurtenances thereunto belonging or appertaining, and all the estate, right, title, interest, lien, equity and claim whatsoever of grantor, either in law the use, benefit and profit of the said grantee forever. Laser Generated by 0 Display Systems, Inc , 2020 (863) 763NN Form FLQCD-2 in anywise or equity, for k * OR 5719 PG 1012 *** Quitclaim Deed _Page z Parcel ID Number: 332$00533C27 In Witness Where 7 t gin .:, Prin Wi to Printed Name Witness has hereunto set its hand and seal the day and year first above written. ur presence: STATE QF Florida �' CQUNTY %JF Collier The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before Michel Saadeh, MGR of RCAMS company who is personatiy known to me or who has produced his Flori RC,AMS Advisers, LLC, a Florida limited Liability company P.O. Address: 434 Ttrraclna Ct., Naples, F�. 34l 19 day of `✓ a� � by LLC , a F1ori.da 1=i u ted liability Y p • DE'NA L. WALTCNACK • ` . rotary Public - State of Florida t `11 LOMMISSfon a GG 220204 • .'.,.....,.. Y Comm. Expires May 21, 2022 }"0 qpdihrOA h National Notary Assn. F `. 4 GMADV2 SORSDEED Laser Generated by C Display Systems, inc., 2020 (8b3) 763-SSSS Form FLQCD-2 i i i i 1Will I ' • 11 OWN 1 ♦0 1 m I I1 6h`GIhEERS I LhN�SC�PE P�GHf 1EC i S l PLIr'ER3 I SU�I�V�RS 950 Encore Way Naples, FL 34110 Phone: (239) 254-2000 Florida Certificate of Authorization Number: 1772 www.holemontes.com EXHIBIT IV.D.1 GMA COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT CHECKED BY JAC DRAWN BY MSK DATE 4 PROJECT No. 2023.025 CAD FILE NAME: GMPA EXHIBIT —ITEM INSET SUBJECT SITE IMAGE 2023 PER GOGGLE MAPS SUBJECT SITE 0 2ao aoo sca�E iu � i mmolca�ee Rd 3 Orangetrec �4 i . Rand•11.Btvd- � Y____ . - PROJECT LOCATION MAP SCALE: 1" = 3000' - LIMITS OF SUBJECT SITE 6 0 N N a 3 O Cit.C3 Qm)I CZJ CN AERIAL PER MAPPING DATA SERVICE 2023 � ate' - • -- .-�vr' _� . _-- i to too IA war �'It , \ \ �t, EXHIBIT V.A.2 SUBJECT SITE AERIAL OVERLAY � 100 200 SCALE IN FEET LIMITS OF - SUBJECT SITE LETTER I REVISIONS 0ATE IMMOKALEE RANDALL COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT 9( 9� PROP ERTY EXISTING LAND USE ZON IN G Vacant: collier County E SUBJECT SITE Stormwater management Across Immoka lee Rd. va cant NORTH and single family residential E SOH single-family residential E Across canal, North Collier EAST E (CU) Fire Rescue District WEST Vacant E 0 200 400 SCALE IN FEET - LIMITS OF SUBJECT SITE DESIGN ED 9Y DATE � THESE DRA\MNGS ARE NOT REFER ENCE NO. DRAWING NO. J.A.C. 4 2�23 APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION DRAWiJ 8V DATE � 550 Encore Way Naples, FL 34110 UNLESS SIGNED 9ELOW 2023.025 . p 3 Phone: (239) 254-2D00 EXHIBIT V . A . 3 GMP�.DWG CHECKED 8Y DATE Florida Certficate of Authorization PROJECT NO. SHEET NO. H.�1. 4 2023 HOLE MONTES Number: 1772 ZONING MAP I� (� V ERTICAL SCALE HORIZONTAL SCALE vAvw. hole monteS.CDrn DATE 2023.025 3 OF v 9G k IYi (I UI:ViH WA H R I P AN kv5151v.lem AGRICULTURAL/RURAL DESIGNATION a i ESTATES DESIGNATION Rural Settlement Area District - LIMITS OF SUBJECT SITE SCALE IN FEET Th^ Club at Twin Bonita Bay fast SUBJECT SITE Olde Florida Golf Club J IR'mpkelca Rd PUBLIC SERVICE FACILITIES NOTES COLLIER COUNTY CORKSCREW SHERIFF OFFICE MIDDLE 1. POLICE PROTECTION IS PROVIDED BY COLLIER COUNTY SHERIFF'S SCHOOL OFFICE CORKSCREW MIDDLE 2. FIRE PROTECTION IS PROVIDED BY C SCHOOL NORTH COLLIER FIRE RESCUE DISTRICT powalu F' Z:d O. 3. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS WITHIN ST/W 3 OF THE GOLDEN GATE ORANGE WELL FIELD BLOSSOM RANCW PALMETTO 4. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS NOT LOCATED WITHIN THE COUNTY'S HIGH SCHOOL COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA Oil we'1 i';a ; ;.„fli Rd__ 3 Orangetree . PUBLIC SERVICE FACILITIES LEGEND Immo�aice Rd \ • -SCHOOL Valencia Golf & Ccuntry Club NORTH COLLIER FIRE RESCUE DISTRICT STATI ON 10 • -HOSPITAL -SHERIFF /FIRE DEPARTMENT /EMS - LIMITS OF SUBJECT SITE 0 1500 3000 SCALE: 1" = 3000' LOCATED IN COLLIER COUNTY SUBJECT SITE IN FLOOD ZONE X & AE FIRM PANEL12021 CO240H NO BASE FLOOD ELEVATION LISTED EFF DATE: 5/16/2012 ZONE X: AREAS OF 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD; AREAS OF 1 % ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD WITH AVERAGE DEPTHS OF LESS THAN 1 FOOT OR WITH DRAINAGE AREAS LESS THAN 1 SQUARE MILE; AND AREAS PROTECTED BY LEVEES FROM 1 % ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS {SFHAs) SUBJECT TO INUNDATION BY THE 1% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD The 1% annual chance flood (100-year flood), also known as the base flood, is the flood that has a 1% chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year. The Special Flood Hazard Area is the area subject to flooding by the 1% annual chance flood. Areas of Special Flood Hazard include Zones A, AE, AH, AO, AR, A99, V and VE. The Base Flood Elevation is the water -surface elevation of the 1% annual chance flood. ZONE A No Base Flood Elevations determined. ZONE AE, AE Base Flood Elevations determined. o i5o 3eo SCALE IN FEET - LIMITS OF SUBJECT SITE i • i • i i • i � 3 _ . add IL Jr • ! i N N O CT W 0 CD CD a Z7 D (N (n (D N N 3 CD 0 3 3 0 m m c� a n D m_ D N N O (Jt W Q1 N CD i N W m D r O C� D —I O Z D N O N O N W NAPLES PLO GULF OF MEXICO Email: tuna@thanaples.com EVERGLADES CITY KEY WEST �'° SITE ADDRESS: <> FOLIOS: 37743960001, 37744000009, 37742840009 NAPLES, FL 34120 <> LATITUDE: <> LONGITUDE N 26.274522 W-81.601645 M I� NOTES: <> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES C AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. Marine &Environmental Consulting Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732 Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643111116632 LOCATION MAP RY NO. 5875 THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERlA ITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE, DESIGNED: CDREATEDY JOB NO.: SHEET NO, REV# REV BY. DA1 E CHK CV. Gr 22053.00 4" - - - - 01 OF 02 5" - - - - SECTION-27 TOWNSHIP- 48 S RANGE- 27 E ,.add. rod lad ' wood . to all 1 s�. didP4 do rad ad d at Ida Ilk p a do do onto ad Id fir; r IL qrdo 2 a �- old°�►sti w- e did IL ad 1 6 add do do0at Ado. 5M ad ` t ' y_r•� _ 7 r low sa ,, — toI„' :� . `.� ' In od ad w do ad do t IP i' ' "^� • 'took _r• •` / =his-r=� +► _ - — . s "Jr Y�M,i:.. WIT 1I irg .i IIIdd 10^ � kl it ad ad •t *'' WOODad did Ak do 4too eY :; - - 'fit. IdaA I- old vot ad tool P. go I do add road ,.t • v -r. �4 N� /,.. •M _ � ..: •,� � } `may,. — a. . t law LL AM ` _ do .. f ,�-a —•--r' 0%, -,o!��• _ J to f- ,r do *.f ra-a do IIIat I rat ado ' ` r. AIIIIIId • 3,. r rIII OIL r M\l9j jAd 1I R 4 .. a and �.. P, 624 ._ _ ill ad r k too I ..Ar d' at It 740 ,! aft go Add of do as old al y . Ati 40 , ' t: fad o NP R LIda r�i R : • J do�� i f; lip411IUD a _ a ad 'r ad rdid ii .�•�, do ILit two ob 4 44 as a hot AL 91 ad I do a *,'v I old nrN P, f # Mp .: pp ww do 00 A M ,a fold of 01 _ to ` .r .Y2� .ram w ! C t ti� .!• of AWN dottal-dad ad • • • • • • R• :: 4 • • • @ r , , . AM ., �� • •� 4 IF All, a t J wood y, • do•:. .y EXHIBIT V.C.l IMMOKALEE RD. PARCELS FOLIO #37742840009, 37744000009, AND 3774396001 NAPLES, FL 34120 PREPARED BY: ASSOCIATES, INC. Marine &Environmental Consulting PHo[NE:239-643-0166 VVWW.THAlNAPLES.COM Table of Contents 1 Introduction.......................................................................................................................................1 2 Site Description.................................................................................................................................2 2.1 Vegetation Associations...........................................................................................................2 2.2 Soils.............................................................................................................................................3 2.3 Hydrologic Indicators...............................................................................................................4 3 Photos..................................................................................................................................................5 4 Wildlife............................................................................................................................................... 9 5 Jurisdictional Wetlands.................................................................................................................10 6 Permitting.........................................................................................................................................11 7 Conclusion........................................................................................................................................12 Immokalee Rd. Parcels (Folio #3774284 1 Introduction Wetland Site Assessment Report 0009, 37744000009, and 3774396001) March 2022 Turrell, I�a118� associates, Inc. (THA) has conducted a preliminary wetland assessment at 3 non - addressed parcels off Immokalee Rd. in Naples, FL 34120 within Section 27, Township 48 S, and Range 27 E in Collier County. The parcels can be identified by folio #37742840009, 37744000009, and 3774396001 and are collectively approximately 11.68 acres in size. The goals of the assessment were: • To map and identify existing vegetative communities on the property • To estimate the extent of state and federal jurisdictional wetlands • To research the presence or absence of state and federal listed species • To assess the environmental permitting requirements for construction of residential development This report documents the findings of the assessment in order to establish a wetland boundary (if present) based on criteria used by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) in Chapter 62-340, F.A.C. This evaluation did not include a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment that may be necessary for the reduction of liability for hazardous materials under the provisions of Federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act. This assessment did not research or consider zoning, deed restrictions, easements, or other encumbrances that might be present and could affect the development of the property. This assessment was limited to the environmental factors only and is presented solely to assist with the planning process. 1 Immokalee Rd. Parcels (Folio #3774284 2 Site Description wetland Site Assessment Report 0009, 37744000009, and 3774396001) March 2022 This project site is composed of 2 distinct vegetative communities: a "Pine Flatwoods" habitat, which is an upland community, and a non-hydric Cypress -Pine -Cabbage Palm community, which is also an upland community. Soils within the site are mapped by the USDA as being comprised of 2 types of soil: "Immokalee fine sand", which is not a hydric soil, and "Holopaw fine sand" which is a hydric soil. Soil plugs taken on -site did not appear hydric. Hydrologic indicators were not observed anywhere on site. 2.1 Vegetation Associations The Florida Land Use, Cover, and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS) manual was used to classify all of the vegetative communities occurring within the site boundaries. The attached FLUCFCS exhibit shows the subject property, its vegetative cover, and depicts the approximate limits of the wetland and upland areas. A general description is provided below in Table 1 along with any site -specific nuances that may be relevant to the assessment. Table 1: FLUCFCS codes and description of community types found within the project site FLUCFCS Code Description Acres Jurisdictional wetlands 411 Pine Flatwood 9.79 No 530 Reservoirs 1.32 Yes 624 Cypress - Pine - Cabbage Palm (Non~Hydric) 0.22 No 740 Disturbed Land 0.16 No 814 Roads and Highways 0.19 No Total: 11.68 Pine Flatwood Vegetative communities in Florida designated as Pine Flatwoods typically occur in such a way that the canopy is dominated by longleaf or slash pine while the substrata is composed of a variety of upland species such as saw palmetto or American beautyberry. Within the Pine flatwoods community on this site, the canopy is composed primarily of slash pine while cabbage palms are common associates. The substrata of the Pine Flatwood community on this site are composed mainly of additional cabbage palms, saw palmetto, and muscadine grape vines. A list of observed species within the Pine Flatwoods community on the site can be seen below in Table 2. Table 2: Observed vegetation within the Pine Flatwood habitat on site. Common Name Scientific Name Strata,/ Substrata Wetland Designation Est. Coverage Slash p1l LIC; Pinus elliottii C, M, G UPL 70 Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto C, G FAC 40 Cypress Taxodium distichum C OBL 1 Wetland Site Assessment Report Immokalee Rd. Parcels (Folio #37742840009, 37744000009, and 3774396001) March 2022 Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolia C, M, G FAC 3 Saw palmetto Serrenoa repens G UPL 30 American beautyberry Callicarpa americana G UPI, 3 Earleaf acacia Acacia aunculiformis C, M, G FAC 1 Muscadine grape Vitis rotund ifoIia G, V FAC 20 Rusty Staggerbush Lyonia ferruginea G UPI, 5 Swamp fern Telmatoblechnum serrulatum G FACW 1 Cocoplum Chrysobalanus icaco G FACW 1 C =Canopy M =Mid -story G =Groundcover V =Vine OBL - Obligate Wetland FACW = Facultative Wetland FAC = Facultative FACU = Facultative Upland UPL = Upland Cypress -Pine -Cabbage Palm Vegetative communities in Florida designated as Cypress - Pine - Cabbage Palm are typically defined by a mixture of the three namesake species where no single species has attained complete dominance. The canopy of the Cypress - Pine - Cabbage Palm community on this site is characteristically comprised of slash pine, cypress, and cabbage palm, while the groundcover consists of saw palmetto, Brazilian pepper, muscadine grape vines, and minorly of swamp fern. A list of observed species of vegetation within the Cypress - Pine - Cabbage Palm community on this site can be seen below in Table 3. Table 3: Observed vegetation within the Cypress -Pine -Cabbage Palm community on site. Common Name Scientific Name Strata/ Substrata Wetland Designation Est. Coverage C y p ress Taxodium distichum C OBL 25 Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto C, G FAC 25 Slash pil LK,- Pinus elliottii C, M, G UPI, 15 Laurel oak Quercus laurifolia 5 Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolia C, M, G FAC 20 Saw palmetto Serrenoa repens 10 Muscadine grape Vitis rotundifolia G, V FAC 5 Swamp fern Telmatoblechnum serrulatum G FACW 3 C =Canopy M =Mid -story G =Groundcover V =Vine OBL -Obligate Wetland FACW =Facultative Wetland FAC =Facultative FACU = Facultative Upland UPI, = Upland 2.2 Soils According to the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), there are 2 types of soil mapped as comprising the entirety of the subject property: "Immokalee fine sand", which is not a hydric soil, and "Holopaw fine sand" which is a hydric soil. Soil plugs taken on -site did not appear hydric anywhere within the three parcels surveyed. It is likely that the canal to the east of 3 Wetland Site Assessment Report Immokalee Rd. Parcels (Folio #37742840009, 37744000009, and 3774396001) March 2022 the subject properties has drained the sites to a point where the soils are no longer hydric (if they ever were). 2.3 Hydrologic Indicators Hydrologic indicators were not observed anywhere on the subject properties. Additionally, the site also exhibited several indicators of a lack of hydrology —most notably the over -growth of vines growing along the ground. In some locations, the vines have "buried" all underlying vegetation. Also notable on the site were 2 apparent gopher tortoise burrows. Though burrows can occasionally be found in more wet areas, they are most often found in dry upland areas. The volume of leaf litter on the ground is also not consistent with wetland habitat. These factors, in addition to the canal to the east, and the almost entirely upland vegetation found throughout the 3 parcels indicates that none of the three sites contain functioning wetlands. 0 NIX far toll Valiant a two IN 3 may^ •, r . -- s.' \f !. �t' 1 rf - p, c i, r• ma 4 at 44 1.0 a IN 4 now goo or I I A Iv it 4 i?"Ingait No an bi S 1 E TV 1 A one la 0 _ tJj R , _ M IPA +e �,, 1 j IF I♦. `.`. look ow 1 on No No I air "PA 0 •a .•.i { or 4011 ♦.{ .gg�' e. `al•• -�'- , . a ti • ".:ter-.'Y good? a - ,'hl '% �, ir+yll' R !���T i , % IV wo Via I &I Van, I gI I al 1 00 0 Ion IF A go I A ma to Van WI III tip Affi, I no 0 owe .r g _ ter- -�• - f '" i, so Von ,No Ids - 1 }�r , 1 got, Not mignIgoo aw, zw 01 or go ►� J. S . Y•, ' �r�ry�,� �li!4' ►!10 il�r F 1 III a It 61 - -"1 (go; wwo A _ -'Al� Y jiy a.a7 ram: - ._ e'd•P :.: �A 'All j 1"VI • �t--tom'}``go 1 r Nato ,� `1 • .� :� . 1. _ _� .. IV to no +ems :f _ .. to r r. r t^ .� : of .• �•. •e ,.a.r IL I NEW I alp Wrong Von on IF 440 go No ago for I Alto No�,. - / yy -age to E Y ( rL- y ,[ i > . ♦ e +• R r f yyGglop yVon _. _ WN t L r.•�. 00 I IMF I t p 4' e• IF no VIVO to a . 1. al i•, 1 , {oppopas 06 r. jay y for Ir y 1 MI do I go %o ... � = 'A goo C•'Voll, Iowa, I long .��_ J, •;`` , . - ram` -. Wetland Site Assessment Report Immokalee Rd. Parcels (Folio #37742840009, 37744000009, and 3774396001) March 2022 Photo 3: View of Pine Flatwood habitat on northwest site. Photo 4: Cypress -Pine -Cabbage Palm community on site. Weiland Site Assessment Report Immokalee Rd. Parcels (Folio #37742840009, 37744000009, and 3774396001) March 2022 Photo 5: Gopher tortoise burrow found just off of the property, likely indicative of dry conditions. Photo 6: Vines seen covering the ground, indicative of a lack of hydrology 7 Immokalee F.A. P Par Wetland Site Assessment Report (Folio #37742840009, 37744000009, and 3774396001) March 2022 1 404..\'I Jr, oreere or b A 4 Ago gIV ' :A , *r:: { rr ` Y v r Y �t� `oft 41 0441 or i'= 1 + • :� . 1 1. f Sh: +—• k ter. Ago o's VARNA of AW to t Ago Age + _. rot 0Amto ?�'' .t.. a '.` `_ , r or. grow of to ogge* op I, Pro r to, - t +': i 0 or gig. offir r of I for Iry It ff got ''� s ."' .•ate - of A �•_Ir or Y sa. LL r At .� . — — �.. rAt Photo 7: Soil p lug taken on site. go F r ore Age � AW go ego 7it.titijt ' To I or I _:.• .;p . tiIgo L 'A For Or p . ; geor i— r, kkk or T •�.� • Af ,iz on, 4 {• ry� -f uric, go" Al .!p too g v 4 ,1••mr _r c>h b� ry IS if - f "F got L -of or tort ry w Vo Wooer top go 1 r ot It 1, 4{ r w� S ? �` - ds to ro or,� ,�- •"aAt AL �• '. go jf'ov. Art go �, -'1� —^ ter• - T or Ago At ►.¢ ,L 40 pit —A Photo 8: Cross section of plug seen in Photo 7, taken at 6" depth. Note the lack in contrast of color, characteristic of a lack of stripping within the soil's matrix. Wetland Site Assessment Report Immokalee Rd. Parcels (Folio #37742840009, 37744000009, and 3774396001) March 2022 4 Wildlife Endangered Wildlife Species is defined as any species of fish or wildlife naturally occurring in Florida, whose prospects of survival are in jeopardy due to modification or loss of habitat, over - utilization for commercial, sporting, scientific or educational purposes; disease; predation; inadequacy of regulatory mechanisms; or other natl or manmade factors affecting its ura continued existence (FS 372.072). Threatened species include any species of fish or wildlife naturally occurring in Florida which may not be in immediate danger of extinction, but which exists in such small populations as to become endangered if it is subjected to increased stress as a result of further modification of its environment. Species of Special Concern are animals that: 1) Have a significant vulnerability to habitat modification, environmental alteration, human disturbance, or human exploitation which, in the foreseeable future, may result in its becoming a threatened species unless appropriate protective or management techniques are initiated or maintained, 2) Data are limited or lacking, 3) May occupy such an unusually vital or essential ecological niche that should it decline significantly in numbers or distribution other species would be adversely affected to a significant degree, 4) Has not sufficiently recovered from a past population depletion. Taking into account the location and condition of the property, and conversations with state aI d federal agency personnel, listed wildlife species that could potentially be found on or around the site include: Common Name Florida -aanther Florida bonneted bat Eastern indi o snake Red cockaded woodpecker Gopher tortoise Scientific Name Status Puma concolor corUi f E Eumops floridanus Drymarchon couperi Leuconotobicus borealis herus pol�uphemus E E T During the course of the wetland assessment on site, no listed species nor signs thereof were observed with the exception of a single apparently abandoned gopher tortoise burrow on the northeastern parcel, and a second potentially occupied burrow on an adjacent parcel, near the property boundary. It is important to note that although 2 burrows were observed, a tortoise burrow survey was not specifically completed. These burrows were simply noted during the wetland assessment field work and the count provided is not representative of the total burrow count on site. Furthermore, a full blown Threatened and Endangered Species survey was also not done (and may not be required). Wetland Site Assessment Report Immokalee Rd. Parcels (Folio #37742840009, 37744000009, and 3774396001) March 2022 5 Jurisdictional Wetlands The wetlands definition in Chapter 62-340(19), F.A.C. states that wetlands are those areas "inundated or saturated by surface water or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soils." The methodology used to delineate a wetland boundary as described in Chapter 62-340, F.A.C. uses a series of tests in order to determine the presence of a wetland. On a significant portion of this site, this definition was met. In order to be considered a wetland per the definition referenced above, a property must have two of three of the following characteristics: hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and hydrologic indicators. Within the Pine Flatwoods community on -site, vegetation is hydrologic indicators were observed, and soils did not appear not meet the definition of a jurisdictional wetland, primarily upland in nature, no hydric. This area therefore does Within the Cypress -Pine -Cabbage Palm community on -site, vegetation may be considered hydrophytic. Though soils did not appear hydric and no hydrologic indicators were observed either. This area therefore also does not meet the definition of a jurisdictional wetland. During the scope of this report, the "Disturbed", "Roads and Highways", and the "Reservoirs" areas were not analyzed. The "Disturbed" and "Roads and Highways" are assumed to be uplands. And the "reservoirs" area is assumed to be a wetland. 10 Immokalee Rd. Parcels (Folio #37742840 6 Permitting Wetland Site Assessment Report 009, 37744000009, and 3774396001) March 2022 It is the opinion of TI-IA that n0 portion of the subject properties (barring the "Reservoirs" area) appears to meet the definition of a jurisdictional wetland per Chapter 62-340 F.A.C. Accordingly, it is not expected that any kind of Environmental Resource Permit or 404 permit for wetland impacts will be required to move forward with development of these properties. If the local building department requires proof that the project sites do not consist of wetlands, then this proof can be obtained from the FDEP or South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) by requesting a verification of exemption from needing permits. This process typically takes around 30 days to obtain and involves a site visit by a representative of either the FDEP or SFWMD. If the area is confirmed as not consisting of wetlands, then no further wetland permitting will be required at the state or federal levels, and mitigation will not needed. If the representative disagrees with this assessment, and permitting for wetland impacts is required, this process can take up to 9 to 12 months to complete and will require mitigation to offset impacts to jurisdictional wetlands. The regulating agencies will also coordinate with wildlife agencies such as the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) regarding listed species which can include but are not limited to the red cockaded woodpecker, Florida panther, the Florida bonneted bat, various wading birds and other species. There is a public notice associated with this permit process which allows the public, adjacent owners, and other government agencies an opportunity to review the project and provide comments. Once any comments have been addressed and the mitigation paid, a permit can be issued. 11 Wetland Site Assessment Report Immokalee Rd. Parcels (Folio 7T37742840009, 37744 7 Conclusion 000009, and 3774396001) March 2022 Based on the wetlands definon in Chapter 62-340(19), F.A.C., it is the opinion of THA that no portion of this site meets the definition of a jurisdictional wetland (with the exception of the canal to the east) and permits from the FDEP or SFWMD should not be required to move forward with development. If verification of exemption from needing a state permit is required in order to obtain a local building permit, this can typically be obtained in approximately 30 days. 12 EVERGLADES KEY WEST iOr CITY SITE ADDRESS: <> FOLIOS: 37743960001, 37744000009, 37742840009 NAPLES, FL 34120 <> LATITUDE: <> LONGITUDE N 26.274522 W-81.601645 M I, NOTES: <> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES C AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. - Turrell, Hall &Associates, Inc, Marine &Environmental Consulting 3584 Exchange Ave. Naplcs, FL 34104-3732 Email: tuna@thanaples.com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Far: (239) 643-6632 DESIGNED. NP 1, _ _ _ S AA � E H ASSESSMENT CREATEDY 03-23-22 3. _ _ _ _ JOB IVO. 22053.00 4. - - - - LOCATION MAP SHEET NO. 010F03 5. _ _ _ _ RY N0, 5875 THE E DRAVANOS ARE FOR PERNITT INC PURP09E3 ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUOTION USE. SECTION - 27 TOWNSHIP- 4 8 S RAN tit W4. if 411 A.. � y It V w, k A � ---. _ _ ,----------.---- . ___ "KALE AIP LID SUBJECT s WAL Air V t` ti "- 44pv oil, Ilk .Y:. - �'�✓. f y ? i.,�,s .; V. IV ` .r.��� e 'Fir .-+9"elf . oIW 27 leot -�Ml� ryr .i 'r,•,{+ M 7!iu °�r {i � '.7' ".•��'+F � C or IV .�T- - t,�. ...,r r --. _ WL rw. �.. I -�. t► ,� ``T Ij .j}�r + w -irr ce •�► � � ,T. s, .._ WIN W 000 Ilk It IILV lyp VIEW > Aey k �rIt y� r it AIN AltEt •fir . 1 "+�+VV (r yyM ,�. - r• ,nvi ji - 1�f N t yam; A wow ilk �� .'N �-/Y •x � +fI ` r [ Y �•y..Y�a 4 T.•r .- +ti a .w ,, r _xNOTES.,. SURVEY • . SURVEY • , _!F � �f •o tii t � c• tt. R , . JI it, 11 lililill III,, EXHIBIT V.C.2 GM ADVISORS LLC IMMOI<Air EE RD. PARCELS NAPLES, FL 34120 FOLIO #37743960001, 377440000091 AND 37742840009 PREPARED BY: ASSOCIATES, INC. Marine &Environmental Consulting PHc�INTE:239-643--0166 VVWW.THAIN1A1'LES.CQM 1 Introduction....................................................................................................................0.. 0...............1 2 Existing Conditions and Project Description..............................................................................2 3 Methodology......................................................................................................................................3 4 Data &Results................................................................................................................................... 4 5 Discussion.......................................................................................................................................... 6 6 Conclusion........................................................................................................................................10 7 Photos................................................................................................................................................11 Immokalee Rd. Parcels Listed Species Assessment August 2022 1 Introduction Terrell, I Ia118� Associates, Inc. (TI-3A) has performed a listed species assessment On 4 vacant lots located just off of Immokalee Rd. in Naples, Florida. The properties are bordered to the south by single-family residences, to the north and west by vacant residential lots, and to the east by a man-made canal, across which is a Fire Department station and an additional vacant lot. The sites are located within Section 27, Township 48 S, and Range 27 E in Collier County. The parcels can be identified by folio #37743960001, 37744000009, and 37742840009 and are collectively 15.46 acres in size. The sites can be found at coordinates N 26°16'32.56", W-81°367.31" or N 26.275712, W-81.602031. This listed species assessment was conducted at the request of the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), but is intended for use by any regulating agencies, such as The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE), the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC)., the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), or the Collier County building department. This document addresses state and federally listed species that may be associated with the proposed project lands and the effect, or lack thereof, of this project on these species. The species at issue include: • Florida bonneted bat (FBB) (Eumops glaucinus floridanus) • Red -cockaded woodpecker (R(.W) (Picoides borealis) • Big Cypress fox squirrel (Sciurus niger avicennia) • Eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon couperi) • Gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) • Florida panther (Puma concolor corgi) The result of the analysis in this document is a determination that the development activities proposed are not likely to adversely affect any of the above listed species. The reasoning behind this conclusion is further discussed in the Discussion below (Section 5). This document is based on information compiled from the South Florida Multi -Species Recovery Plan ("SFMSRP"), Statewide Programmatic Biological Opinions, wildlife surveys, field inspections, and other sources of information. 1 Immokalee Rd. Parcels Listed Species Assessment August 2022 At present, the subject properties consist predominantly of approximately 9.79 acres of Pine Flatwood habitat and 3.23 acres of a man-made stormwater retention area. The remainder of space consists of 0.74 acres of roads and highways, 0.17 acres of disturbed Land, 1.32 acres of canals or "reservoirs", and 0.22 acres of Cypress -Pine -Cabbage Palm habitat. Undisturbed areas within the subject properties can be categorized by just 2 habitat types: Pine Flatwoods, and Cypress -Pine -Cabbage Palm. Within the Pine Flatwood on this site, canopy coverage consists predominantly of slash pine while occasional cypress and cabbage palms are also present, but in notably lesser abundance. Midstory and groundcover are sparse and comprised predominantly of cabbage palm, saw palmetto, American beautyberry, and muscadine grape vines. Within the Cypress -Pine -Cabbage Palm, canopy coverage is predominantly of cypress trees, while slash pine, cabbage palm, Brazilian pepper, and laurel oaks are common associates. Mid story and groundcover are largely comprised of Brazilian pepper, swamp fern, and saw palmetto. The proposed project entails clearing of the remaining wooded lots (approximately 10.17 acres), creating a new stormwater retention area on the southern parcel, and relocating the outfall structures from the existing to the new stormwater retention area. The parcel containing the new stormwater retention area would be deeded to Collier County, while the remaining parcels would be developed in some fashion. For the sake of this report, the determined future use is unknown at this time. While the vegetative communities on site are not suitable for many listed species, they can potentially serve as habitat for the Florida bonneted bat (FBB, Eumops floridanus), Red cockaded woodpecker (RCW, Leuconotopicus borealis), Big Cypress fox squirrel (Sciurus niger avicennia), Eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon couperi), Gopher tortoise (Gopherus Polyphemus), and Florida panther (Puma concolor coryi). Existing conditions at the sites and other material facts such as overall hydrology or development within the vicinity may still preclude the site as potential habitat. Analyses of the likelihood or potential of encountering each species listed above is further discussed in the Discussion section below (Section 5). Immokalee Rd. Parcels Listed Species Assessment August 2022 Prior to conducting any wildlife survey or assessment, careful consideration is given to the habitat types) in question and species which are known to utilize such areas. Thus, before any survey is carried out, a number of publications and references are consulted. These include but are not limited to: The Official Lists of Florida's Endangered Species, Threatened Species and Species of Special Concern, dated December 2018, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) Wildlife Methodology Guidelines, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service South Florida Listed Species Profiles and Conservation Areas, and the Florida Natural Areas Inventory (FNAI) for Collier County. The basic objective of any preliminary wildlife assessment is to obtain evidence that a listed species is utilizing the subject site. However, due to the elusive nature of many listed species, direct observation or locating evidence can often be difficult or not possible. Therefore, if no listed species or evidence is observed, the objective is to determine the likelihood that a listed species may be utilizing the site, and whether the proposed activity is likely to impact that species. The site may be comprised of primary or secondary feeding, foraging, or nesting zones or merely be adjacent to those sites for a particular listed species. As many species of concern in Florida are cryptic or camouflaged and nocturnal or crepuscular, patience and sufficient time must be devoted to the survey. Prior to arriving on -site, aerial and FLUCCS mapping are consulted and a system of meandering transects are then followed throughout the site. A slow pace along the transects is maintained, stopping every few minutes to look and listen for movement, calls of any animals, burrows in the ground, tree cavities, and other direct or indirect evidence of utilization. A visual inspection of trees was conducted to search specifically for squirrel day beds, potential RCW cavities, and FBB roosts. Indirect evidence such as rooting, scrape marks, nests, cavities, burrows, tracks, and scat are searched for, duly noted, and located with a GPS in case of the need for further investigation prior to clearing. If direct observation of listed species approximate sighting locations of any listed species are also noted on a survey aerial. 3 occurs, Immokalee Rd. Parcels Listed Species Assessment August 2022 To date, the subject properties have been visited a number of times. A short description of each visit has been provided below in Table 1: Table 1: Timing and conditions during each visit to the subject properties: Date Time Ambient Conditions Tem erature (F) 3/24/2022 12:00 pin - 4:00 pm Scattered clouds, 0 - 5 mph winds 850 7/27/22 10:30 am -1:00 pm Clear skies, 5 -10 mph winds 870 8/16/22 8:30 am -12:00 pm Clear skies, 5 -10 mph winds 880 A list of all wildlife species directly observed on the site is provided below in Table 2. Designations are per the Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's South Florida Listed Species Lists. Table 2: Species of wildlife observed while on -site Common Name Scientific Name Status Black vulture Coragyps atratus NL Red bellied woodpecker Melanerpes carolinus NL Northern mockingbird Mimus polyglottos NL Eastern cottontail rabbit Sylvilagus floridanus NL *Observed flying overhead S = State T = Threatened 1d = FWS Species of Management Concern F =Federal E = Endangered NL = Not listed During the initial survey inspection, it was noted that 2 burrows were found within the boundaries of the subject properties. The first was in the berm of the stormwater retention area and appeared to be an active or potentially occupied gopher tortoise burrow. The second burrow was located nearby within the Pine Flatwood habitat and appeared to be an abandoned gopher tortoise burrow. Tortoises were not observed within the burrows or anywhere else on site. Also observed during this inspection were a number of dead slash pines containing cavity holes that could potentially be utilized by the Florida bonneted bat. During this initial inspection, no additional listed species or evidence of listed species was noted. The second site visit was completed in conjunction with a representative from the South Florida Water Management District. At this time a full-scale survey of the properties was not completed. Rather this site visit was conducted for the purposes of a wetland assessment. However, during the visit, no direct or indirect observation of listed species was noted. And it was found that both of the apparent gopher tortoise burrows seen in the initial site visit, were no longer present. Immokalee Rd. Parcels Listed Species Assessment August 2022 During the third site visit, the entirety of the subject properties were surveyed and assessed for listed species (as was done in the initial site visit). During this visit, again neither direct nor direct evidence of listed speci ines of wildlife was observed on any of the subject properties. Gopher tortoise burrows remained absent from the sites, and the snags observed in the initial inspection were gps located. These cavities are discussed in further detail below in Section 5. 5 Immokalee Rd. Parcels Listed Species Assessment August 2022 5 Discussion As stated above in the results section, no direct observations of listed species were made during any of the site visits. However, it is important to emphasize that the lack of direct observation of listed species on the site by -itself is not sufficient evidence for a conclusion that the site is void of listed species. This is particularly true considering the 2 burrows observed in the initial inspection anA the 4 cavity snags present on site. Sti11, considering the habitat present on the sites, surrounding developments, and the impacts proposed on the property, we can make inferences as to the likelihood of impacts to listed species occurring as a result of a proposed project. Before considering the scope of impacts proposed and the location and condition of the property, all listed species that could potentially be found on or around habitats which are present on -site must be considered. A list of protected species which may be found in habitats similar to that which is found on the subject properties can be seen below in Table 3. Table 3: Listed species of wildlife that occur in habitats similar to that of the subject property. Common Name Scientific Name Status Florida bonneted bat (FBB) Eumops floridanus FE, SE Red cockaded woodpecker RCW Leuconotopicus borealis FE, SE Big cypress fox squirrel Sciurus niger avicennia ST Eastern indigo snake Drymarchon couperi FT, ST Gopher tortoise Gopherus polyphemus ST Florida panther Puma concolor coryi FE, SE S =State T =Threatened F =Federal E = Endangered Florida Bonneted Bat (FBB The FBB is a black or gray -brown to cinnamon -brown colored bat with short glossy fur. Though small relative to other native Floridian mammals, it is the largest bat found in Florida. The FBBs' ears, after which it is named, are large and project forward approximately 19-31 mm. Due to the scarcity and logistics of studying the FBB, roosting, foraging and breeding characteristics for the FBB are not well understood. According to available but limited scientific data, they can be found roosting in old dead trees, in palm fronds, behind loose bark, in cracks, and in holes carved out by other birds or insects. To date, there have only been a handful of confirmed active roosts located in natural settings (i.e. trees, snags, etc.). FBBs are most often found using manmade structures such as bat houses, the underside of bridges and overpasses, roof tiles, and abandoned buildings. They are not migratory and feed on insects such as beetles, moths, and flies. To consider potential effects of residential construction on the FBB, potential roosting habitats were identified based on information from the 2013 Florida Fish 8� Wildlife Conservation Immokalee Rd. Parcels Listed Species Assessment August 2022 Commission Species Action Plan and then surveyed for evidence of bat utilization following survey guidance from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The habitat on this site consists almost entirely of Pine Flatwoods. In these types of habitats, primary roosting sites consist of cabbage palm frond husks, excavated cavities in dead or dying pine trees, or within cracks or under the bark of living trees. Numerous cabbage palms and several snags or dead trees are present on the subject property (see exhibit sheet 4 for snag and dead tree locations). Although each potential roosting site was inspected to the best of our ability, none could be confirmed as containing or not containing bats due to the height and inaccessibility of the cavities. However, audible noises, droppings, direct observations, etc. were not noted during the survey period. If required, each cavity will be inspected with a peep camera prior to clearing. Considering the remaining habitat on and off the site, relative scarcity of utilization of natural roosts, and the direct observation of red -bellied woodpeckers on the site which compete for space with bats, it is unlikely that the cavities are utilized by bonneted bats. Therefore, impacts to the Florida Bonneted Bat will likely not be incurred as the result of removal of the snags and construction of a project. Red Cockaded Woodpecker (R The RCW is anon -migratory, territorial bird typically reaching an overall length of approximately 8 to 9 inches. They live in cooperative social breeding groups and use mature pine trees (longleaf or slash pine) to develop nest cavities. The RCW is the only North American woodpecker that excavates its roost and nest cavities in living pine trees. In this area of south Florida, RCWs typically only use mature slash pine trees for cavity construction. To consider potential effects of the proposed project on the RCW, potential nesting trees are identified based on information from the 2004 FWS Species Conservation Guidelines and then surveyed for evidence of cavity construction following survey guidance from the FWS. While surveying transects across the property, all slash pine trees greater than 5 inches dbh are noted and inspected for signs of cavities or cavity excavation. On this site, the Pine Flatwood habitat that covers the majority of the project site and could be considered a suitable habitat for the RCW. However, the vast majority of pine trees present on this site are not mature and so as a result, likely cannot support cavity excavation by RCWs. Furthermore, there were no cavities observable within living slash pine trees anywhere on the site. Considering that no cavities were observed within living pine trees on site and that other non -listed species of woodpeckers were observed during the site visit, the likelihood that RCWs will be affected by the proposed activities is most likely minimal to non-existent. Bid Cypress Fox Squirrel The Big Cypress fox squirrel is a large tree squirrel that typically reaches lengths of approximately 22 to 26 inches and which often occurs in a combination of colors including black, orange, white and silver. 7 Immokalee Rd, Parcels Listed Species Assessment August 2022 In general, the big cypress fox squirrel prefers areas comprised of a mosaic of pine forests, cypress swamps, and hardwood hammocks where the groundcover is relatively open. This allows for foraging along the ground and direct line of sight on potential predators. The habitat on this site could be considered consistent with the needs of the fox squirrel as it ists Pine d CCbbPlhbitat consof mostly Flatwoods anminorly of ypress -Pine -aage am a. Additionally, much of the sites contain a sparse midstory and groundcover. However, lack of utilization evidence such as direct observation, visible day beds, chewed pinecones, etc, indicates that the site is likely not currently being utilized. The adjacent road and canal system have likely g . aided in isolatinthis location from utilization Eastern Indio Snake The eastern Indigo snake is a large, stout bodied snake that can reach lengths of up to 8 feet and which is almost entirely black in color with the exception of the chin and throat regions, which can range in color from reddish brown to white. The eastern indigo snake utilizes a wide range of habitats from upland scrubs and sandhills to wet prairies and mangrove swamps. They can often be found residing in gopher tortoise or armadillo burrows, Considering their elusive nature, their large home range, and the wide array of habitats they may utilize, there is potential that eastern indigo snakes could be found within the project area. However, no eastern indigo snakes were directly observed on the project site. Nor were there any burrows observed in the latest survey which could be utilized, or other indication of potential utilization. Therefore, although the entirety of the property technically consists of land that may provide suitable habitat, it is unlikely that that the proposed project will by itself have a measurable impact on the eastern indigo snake. Should an eastern indigo snake be found on the site at any time, the appropriate authorities will be notified accordingly. Gopher Tortoise The gopher tortoise is a medium sized tortoise that generally reaches a total length of 10 to 12 inches and which is fully adapted for life in upland habitats. They commonly utilize habitats such as sandhills, upland scrub, xeric oak hammocks, or disturbed sites such as pastures or developed building sites to dig burrows. Gopher tortoises tend to gravitate towards habitats containing a sparse canopy with an open understory as this allows for easy navigation of habitat and burrows can often be structurally supported by roots. However, gopher tortoises typically avoid dense forests as abundant roots can act as insurmountable obstacles for burrow excavation. Gopher tortoises construct burrows of usually 5 to 15 feet in length (though they can sometimes be much longer) to avoid predation and for shelter from inclement weather such as cold temperatures or forest fires. Habitats containing or being actively utilized by gopher tortoises are easily identified by the burrow apron of fresh (often white) sand that is excavated from the burrow which is often "decorated" with droppings in and around the burrow entrance. Immokalee Rd. Parcels Listed Species Assessment August 2022 On this site, a significant portion of habitat is a Pine Flatwood community, which is suitable for habitation by the gopher tortoise. However, as of the last 2 site visits, there were no observable burrows found on the site. Therefore, the proposed project will most likely have no effect on the gopher tortoise. Because of the 2 burrows observed during the initial survey, however, any construction crews will be advised of the potential for tortoise encounters so as to take care avoiding adverse interactions. Should additional tortoise burrows become established within 25 feet of the footprint of a project on site, the appropriate removal permits will be obtained, and the inhabiting tortoise(s) will be relocated to a permitted off -site location. Florida Panther The Florida Panther is a large reddish -brown and white cat, endemic to the Floridian peninsula that is typically observed between 70 and 150 lbs. The Florida panther is typically found within a range of mostly forested upland and wetland habitats. Large wetland tracts of habitat have been proven to be of particular importance as these areas are mostly inaccessible to humans and as a result, provide diurnal refuge. The subject properties are located in an area designated by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service as a secondary zone of the South Florida Panther focus area. Therefore, this location could potentially be utilized by the Florida Panther. However, considering its near entirely upland status, largely open understory, proximity to Immokalee Road (which is a major roadway), and other adjacent man-made developments, this location is likely less attractive for use by panthers than many other locations. Immokalee Rd. Parcels Listed Species Assessment August 2022 6 Conclusion Although the location of the subject properties is within the consultation areas of several listed species and suitable habitat is present for certain species as well, there is no evidence or indication that the site is actually currently being utilized by any of these species. Therefore, it is the opinion of T�IA that the development of the subject properties should not adversely impact any listed or protected species. 10 ONE Is olls- 0 or L .i LL to oft IOWA 100 NO - op (( •i.. •y y No r IF {,�� 4IF IF I ON VON t _ IF IF III . a IF In 1 (AV dl If . IN IF A NO CI _ .f .� � _ r �. -, 77 Off A t /rt7•, IL 4 i. 4- Y. .� ' ti�•ylp�rl f, ( t, •+ 1 FF . �f � 1 No IF AV, Iry F low L Near t I ; a 0 j. — ,. � , ''3,SAN ' wool AN I VIA 04 ANN VAN a AV Ilk -A; OWN As FlboN 0 NFL For A ot , 4L 4 AN AF or of. ask Fri Vol I AV IN a AV Map ;, a t IV 64 AV o� Alp of w so AN F or M. stArissam; F 6 Vol also k iyvr ,VA ' s ' - t _ r ly�f ,r ._--- -- .._.._ _ _. _ .�.'_ _ Z I' _"_ to S.J. r r. . -+....-,ter---- - _ . r- A. ' �Ammmmmm- -A- VAN L tea--• f. ,ifa A.VAN_ - .. - ate. - �.'2•r Si _ •- I\ I �i ��M! �- _ ter. �cw No N r •F Fs of `� - . `} , Now . %f f• - 11 ly , t fA'r . aNfoo SESS .y �► ' r r ems. r al �! R ► r 1 r �^ .G .. ..alAjIaNlR,o i IoOSw1k B4.T"1IN%9fOII4,a rS VAa :awN jIe vow r do l aA lVr ♦yy7 , 4 _ , �; l s ,-' .' : ; _ 1; �. q __ �. sp \-- ikk IN Saww ti' y r _., ol t 1' iNo , i�� �� T" r�' -s • • • -.X a ems►;, .-1• � _ 1Eve VON Vol VTWF i� Email: tuna@thanaples.com EVERGLADES KEY WEST iOrvV CITY COLLIER COUNTY SITE ADDRESS: <> FOLIOS: 37743960001, 37744000009, 37742840009 NAPLES, FL 34120 <> LATITUDE: <> LONGITUDE N 26.274522 W-81.601645 PJI, NOTES: <> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES C AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. �ur�ell, Hall & Associates, Inc, Marine &Environmental Consulting Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732 Phone: (239)643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 �M ,�.ovisoR.s, LOCATION MAP RY NO. 5875 THESE DRAWIJ NGS ARE FOR PEP ITTING PURPOSES ONLY VJD ARE NOT INTETIDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE, DESIGNED: L � � DP,A1M1 BY CREATED: JOB NO. SHEET NO.: SECTION-27 TOWNSHIP- 48 S RANGE- 27 E per EPA t --, _AI ME 1 ' Also C-1, . , 0. ' Ilk_.a te iAM -- r to It �- -GAIL 0_ _ we —`AA `A 534 ilt.o r A AM 1 to: .4'go E A ALL k 411 T 41 'L. ��7 'Y k - Me A � ' r w 4 Afff .fir r I - Alp. M .� it ;�AM I ' r ".• Me At Apeopeol A, �.. It 1 �k `ilk . .� . Met ME AP IRA teo vie IS *1 k 41� V A ix 0:0 4A tp Met 0 Me AL AM AM AM PINE FLATWOODS 1 .0 ME little AM MEW AM ME em"o el ALE A At pt CYPRESS PINE CABBAGE PALM ,i,•.i'.� �as It . r MA M I'M11 A Ad A. r At F III I ;vtm & o� . I A oft •. �. ME 4lMe v A f�Aa, �.t,'M � . M m*• , -ice JAMMEMEAME Its INEZ 't' • i •t .��{„ • �.I w,, MI.. .'yam eep- UPLAND , . / I ife, '�C,+ 1A, 140out r A- It Me mommmo -P All A MAP -e I EPA AMAAAAt le AM .. r •. f A. MIA�--�NOTES: THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ■ MI Me ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. Uri Awl 7 MiI SURVEY COURTESY OF: "NO SURVEY DATA AVAILABLE" A EPA �F SURVEY DATED: MMmDDmYYYY j � i L Alp .�y • 1 \ t 1 \ L Turrell, Halt & Associates, ffic. ■ ��aaa Al ar" I OF ear "WOO 1 ads I IV Y�offg' } . ,. 60 it r i *ice_, h j c s f aim � l n iIF elln, to '< It ff VV IV I IV bw 010, + VVIV r yy' +�P • ,IF J i c:� ► JOINIf of ) + ' wir IV r�� 4, ; 7 t k` 1$ i s , lo n I� 1JNo A ►Go ' V.i F� : t:Af I * ` ` i■ lo 4 NOMy "1 •�. ! i ' : use " r f►. 1lf+t MsX 1 I { 1 t i I t }i a leek l .•y, .+qor 10 ■ • • / _UI. 111114! lltM Il,_ 1111 lax liillli - fl,llilll,rllill - ! - IIIIIIII'I1111111111I`�,I s I;II{III - jj j llllllllfll11111111111111 -•. � �...�-T•:' ;,;,-- I11III1III11(111� 11111111111111t{i ,►IIII ,.t � �. �`° IIIII1111{11111111111111{ (111111111111111 Jill III11111�' »,�>`a:' 1111,1,1-I1111111111111111 1111I{IIIIIIIIIIIII1111�. 11111,1�i 4�_�: IIfIIIIII�I� _ ;+1-t� IIIIIIIIIIIIII{fl 1 - .,' R,•. ,��,,- I I I I I I I I .r"I l l l l l t l l l l l l l l {III I I I I .� �' � -� IIII1111,11{1111 {f1111{IIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIII t 1111111111111111111111,11 1111111111111111j1 Illlllltll�.if II;IIIIIii1111111111 lilllllll IItVII11 Illllillfllllllll fl I 11111111 I{{1i111111111111 1111111111111111111111111 I11111111111!Ilill;lll Illt,il • _ Ilillllllllllllllllllllll IIIIIIIIII'Il'Il IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII fl 111111111111111111111a1 ! � PREVIOUS (IIIII I (IIIII j TRANSECTS BURROW IIIIIIIIIIL11t�iill (10 lllli1! ■ . IIIIIIIIIIIiII �' I (IIIII IIIIII:III 111111111111JIfIr.11i.if� II III ` _ , If111 111 I1 t I 11111111111111111111 • � �� I,: IIIIIIIIIIlIII111111111 . _-:�.. :ray'.. .� ,.-',•.- �-�'"• i _� I I I I II Igo at CAVITYSNAG 3 a* .... 11111111111111I11111111 - --,liz 0 to 1 44 01.g_ II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIJflllll � . _ F. J • � t. ,. am 'y .. 4" �rsf.l'r 4> ��I (IIIIIIIIIItII{fII,�, III `ter` I I I I I 'CAVIT �Ililllf{Illllr Iva, mmL-1 `M Ili ii IlSNAG 4 ll ■ ti Y ME kk ski a IF I ` 1 FFFI ) two / v _ r ■ 1 \ > sews : \ �� For } FIIF Off 4k IF of Flo FF 10 l ,e MAI , offa�r — yr j IF Ow off . to a to Or tv I N4 IF to l 4C mot. *�r L - ;1I l 4 -MOF Stool IF of 6 POP `F to to If PROPOSED IV I F M CLEARINGa. -W off foot �` ,/ ' II tool �. OFF, F-d IF, t to If Its Via• '°`.a �r �' , �'' �' 1 r. ..,r " _ }4-4 IF OFF of .:; Fir 44 OFF Of L too _' , _ „ ��`ff�� fl�• A` „-� - - 'iti y�� _ '+/ �. 04* 1i/ _J~ _ �4J* f Y do' .� riy. _ �{'. , � r....t �, 1 iyS �.a� _.� /r }'� ,.piaook'' *,r# � 1 ,`7 �T r - T r ,�q � _ For Lao F. .ez N410 IF FOOD IF Of For IF to lif OF. IF TRANSECTS �'1.- w _y i ice' LL1.to - .v r 4.. ✓ — ,..'3r '••` .* ►�. - •gyp �4 r . • s 'F . �Y•. . Or p For Of 4now, 0t' �%; i` I may: �. jel o OFF. of gpo k If off L /FF Foe • �STORMWATER woff IF LL If Alk folk�+ �r i rr' ,r' .� I of Of F OFF 4 !f to IF ft Or OWN Irvpie of d •. low, Il rIF I Flow r off//� • !� AL Oa IF A. Off IFF OF OF ..y,,+ of•t• f c ..N. For F.:IV 4a. For�.tOf IF IF ad move It I AL Fit FFIFFIF 1 47 ow FOOD, !! _ .Wirt } f - zoo Turrell, Halt • Associates,►�®asp v TURRELL, HALL & ASSOCIATES, INC. 3584 Exchange Avenue, Naples, Florida 34104 • Office (239) 643-0166 • Nick@thanaples.com Nicholas Pearson is a Biologist and Project Manager at Terrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. His responsibilities include marine resource surveys, marine -related permitting, terrestrial resource surveys and associated permitting, and due diligence work for both marine and terrestrial in-house projects. EXPERIENCE &REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS �2017 -Present) Wetland Permitting -Active participation in several hundred wetland assessments Or delineations per methodology followed by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, South Florida Water Management District, and many of the local municipalities throughout South Florida for the purposes of single-family, multifamily and commercial construction. �2017 -Present, Compliance and Enforcement Resolution- Provided assistance on numerous single- family, multifamily, and commercial projects with outstanding ERP-related non-compliance issues. �2019 -Present) Veteran's Memorial Parkway Extension- Provided wetland delineation and listed species survey work for the proposed road extension project. (2021) 01de Naples Seaport- Provided the submerged resource survey of the existing facility for proposed dredging plans. �2022 - 2023 the city limits, EDUCATION of Marco Island- Provided listed species permitting for several public parks within • 2013 B.S. Marine Science- Eckerd College ORGANIZATIONS • Florida Association Of Environmental Professionals- Southwest Florida Chapter • Marine Industries Association of Collier County LICENSES • Authorized Gopher Tortoise Agent DIVE CERTIFICATIONS • Advanced Open Water • Rescue Diver, Nitrox • Open Water PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE • Biologist I of Animal Health Team and Assistant Biologist of Quarantine Team- Florida Aquarium 2013-2015 • Shark Ecology- Bimini Biological Field Station 2013 • Intern Mote Marine Lab 2012 Exhibit V.D.1 Narrative, Justification and Supplemental Information Immokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict Existing Conditions and "it it Land Uses The subject property is located adjacent to and. south of Immokalee Road, approximately 773 feet west of the intersection of Immokalee Road and Randall Boulevard and is comprised of three parcels that total ±9.84 acres in size. Two of the parcels are undeveloped. One parcel is currently owned by Collier County. The County cleared this parcel of vegetation to use for dry retention for Immokalee Road. The site is within the Golden Gate Area Master Plan, Rural Golden Gate Estates. The land use designation is currently Estates — Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict. The property is zoned Estates, allowing for low density residential development and limited agricultural activities. The surrounding lands to the north, south, and west are designated Estates —Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict. Lands to the east are designated Estates — Commercial District, Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict. The zoning and existing land use on the surrounding lands is as follows: North South: Across Immokalee Road, zoned Estates residential estate lot and undeveloped. — ST/W-4, developed single-family Zoned Estates — ST/W-3 & ST/W4developed single-family residential estate lots. East: Across a canal, zoned Estates (Conditional Use) — ST/W-4, North Collier Fire West: Zoned Estates — ST/W-3, undeveloped. A portion of the subject site (3.79 acres) is owned. by Collier County and used. to provide stormwater management for Immokalee Road. This County parcel is known as Pond 8. The applicant, GM Advisors, LLC, owns a parcel to the east and south of Pond 8, that consists of 5.0 Acres and fronts a drainage discharge canal. The applicant has proposed to exchange the aforementioned parcel for Pond 8. The swap proposal was independently evaluated by Jacobs Engineering on behalf of Collier County. Several scenarios were evaluated to assess the potential impacts of the pond swap as proposed by the existing permit and standard practices. It was determined that the proposed swap of the County Pond 8, tract 36, unit 23 consisting of 3.79 Acres with GM Advisors, LLC Parcel, Tract 52, unit 23 consisting of 5.0 Acres is very adequate. As well, Tract 52 has frontage along a major drainage canal which may be helpful in cases of severe weather conditions/ hurricanes. As part of the swap, the applicant has proposed to prepare final design plans, obtain the necessary permits to construct the future pond site and install the necessary piping (to the degree necessary, Collier County agrees to be the co -applicant for the permitting). Once the proposed drainage pond is relocated and functional, Collier County will deed the current pond site (the 3.79 acres pond site tract 36, unit 23) to GM Advisors, LLC with a fee simple deed/title. GM Advisors, LLC will simultaneously deed (the 5.0 acres Parcel Tract 52, unit 23) new pond site to Collier County with a fee simple deed/title. Page 1 of 7 H:\2023\2023025\WP\GMPA\Resubmittal\Exhibit V.D.1 —Narrative and Justification (7-25-2023).docx The remainder of the subject site is undeveloped. Requested Changes The proposed GMPA establishes the Immokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict to allow for 125,000 square feet of gross leasable floor area (GLFA) of C-3 commercial uses of the C-3 — Commercial Intermediate District, of which up to 80,000 square feet of GLFA may consist of Indoor Air -Conditioned Mini and Self -Storage (SIC 4225). There is a companion PUD rezoning (PL-20230002458) to ensure compliance with the GMP and the proposed subdistrict. Justification The subject property is within the Immokalee Rd. Randall. Blvd. Study Area, which Collier County concluded to be an appropriate area for the commercial uses necessary to accommodate future growth within the Rural Golden Gate Estates. The property has frontage along Immokalee Road and is adjacent to non-residential uses and the Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict to the east; and is approximately 807' south of the Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict which allows for a variety of commercial, office and residential land uses. As a result, the proposed amendment is consistent with this policy in that it reduces urban sprawl and contains commercial uses in a semi -rural area to a location that is adjacent to existing commercial development. The proposed development will satisfy the increase in retail demand over the next five (5) years for the surrounding area. Retail market expenditures potential is forecasted to be $411,785,656 in ific types of retail uses identified for the Subject Site and the next five (5) years. In addition, spec their related expenditures will grow over $23 million over the same time period. The subdistrict is strategically located to take advantage of the future retail demand and the traffic flowing along Immokalee Road and will make significant economic contributions to Collier County in terms of new salaries and wages plus sales and property taxes. The Project will also provide self -storage square feet that will satisfy the projected demand for self -storage space that will accompany the population growth within the three-mile market area and the demand that will be coming from the fringe areas around the three-mile market area. The demand for self -storage in the three (3)-mile market area is currently 157,515 square feet with no existing supply. There is a proposed 64,314 square foot self -storage facility in the proposed Randall Road mixed use development, which is estimated to be built in 2024. If both the self - storage facility within the Randall Road mixed use development and the potential 80,000 square feet GLFA storage facility within this subdistrict are constructed, the self -storage market area will still have a demand deficit of 37,674 square feet in 2025 growing to a demand deficit of 36,874 square feet in the 2033 horizon year. Consistency with Florida Statutes Section 163.3177(6)(a)2, Florida Statutes: 2. The future land use plan and plan amendments shall be based upon surveys, studies, and data regarding the area, as applicable, including: Page 2 of 7 H:\2023\2023025\WP\GMPA\Resubmittal\Exhibit V.D.1 —Narrative and Justification (7-25-2023).docx a. The amount of land required to accommodate anticipated growth. b. The projected permanent and seasonal population of the area. c. The character of undeveloped land. d. The character of water supplies, public facilities, and services. e. The need for redevelopment, including the renewal of blighted areas and the elimination of nonconforming uses which are inconsistent with the character of the community. f. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to or closely proximate to military installations. g. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to an airport as defined in s. 330.35 and consistent with s. 333.02. h. The discouragement of urban sprawl. i. The need for job creation, capital investment, and economic development that will strengthen and diverse the community's economy. j. The need to modem land uses and development patterns within antiquated subdivisions. The subdistrict is not located. within proximity to a military installation or adjacent to an airport. Paragraphs f and g, above, do not apply. With respect to paragraphs a, b, c, and. d, please see the Commercial Needs Analysis submitted. with this GMPA application. Relative to paragraphs h, I, and j, this property is appropriate for the conversion to allow for commercial uses and does not encourage urban sprawl. The subject property is within the Collier County initiated Immokalee Rd. Randall Blvd. Planning Study area, which consists of approximately 277 acres ±9 miles east and +8.5 miles north of I75. The purpose of this study was to evaluate existing and future conditions, and recommendations for the study area and establish guiding principles for the development of the area. The completed study concluded that this is an appropriate area for future commercial growth to serve the surrounding community. This GMPA will allow for the commercial growth necessary while protecting adjacent land uses. Furthermore, the additional commercial uses will provide an opportunity for job creation and economic growth. Section 163.3177(6)(a)8, Florida Statues: 8. Future land use map amendments shall be based upon the following analyses: a. An analysis of the availability of facilities and services. b. An analysis of the suitability of the plan amendment for its proposed use considering the character of the undeveloped land, soils, topography, natural resources, and historic resources on site. C. An analysis of the minimum amount of land needed to achieve the goals and requirements of this section. The proposed GMPA is consistent with the intent and procedural and substantive requirements set forth in the Florida Statute referenced above. In addition to the analysis found within this narrative, Page 3 of 7 H:\2023\2023025\WP\GMPA\Resubmittal\Exhibit V.D.1 —Narrative and Justification (7-25-2023).docx we have provided supporting documents which collectively constitute sufficient data and analysis to read that conclusion. Section 163.3187(1), Florida Statutes: 1. A small scale development amendment may be adopted under the following conditions: a. The proposed amendment involves a use of SO acres or fewer and.• Ehe proposed. amendment is limited in size to three parcels that total �9.84 acres in size. b. The proposed amendment does not involve a text change to the goals, policies, and objectives of the local government's comprehensive plan, but only proposes a land use change to the future land use map for a site -specific small scale development activity. However, text changes that relate directly to, and are adopted simultaneously with, the small scale future land use map amendment shall be permissible under this section. The amendment proposes to create a subdistrict to allow development of the subject property with the proposed commercial uses. The proposed text changes relate directly to this boundary change, allowing for the aforementioned commercial uses. c. The property that is the subject of the proposed amendment is not located within an area of critical state concern, unless the project subject to the proposed amendment involves the construction of affordable housing units meeting the criteria of S. 420.0004(3), and is located within an area of critical state concern designated by S. 380.0552 or by the Administration Commission pursuant to S. 380.OS(1). The subject property is not located within an area of critical concern. Consistency with GGAMP: Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element OBJECTIVE 1.1: Develop new or revised uses of land consistent with designations outlined on the Rural Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map and provision found in the Land Use Designation Description of this Sub -Element. The subject property is within the Immokalee Rd. Randall Blvd. Study Area, which Collier County concluded to be an appropriate area for the commercial uses necessary to accommodate future growth within the Rural Golden Gate Estates. The property has frontage along Immokalee Road and is adjacent to non-residential uses and the Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict to the east. Architectural standards, and increased setback and perimeter buffering required in the Estates will ensure preservation of and compatibility with adjacent rural neighborhoods. GOAL 3: TO PROVIDE FOR LIMITED COMMERCIAL SERVICES AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR PURPOSES OF SER VING THE R URAL NEEDS OF GOLDEN GATE ESTATES Page 4 of 7 H:\2023\2023025\WP\GMPA\Resubmittal\Exhibit V.D.1 —Narrative and Justification (7-25-2023).docx Ft 1 - , I • I I I • , I I I I ♦ • 7WARACTER, Policy 3.2.1: Within one year of the completion of the Randall Blvd. and Oil Well Rd. Corridor Study, the County Manager or designee shall initiate an evaluation of the future land uses along Immokalee Rd. in the vicinity of Randall Blvd., Oil Well Rd. and Wilson Blvd. (as generally shown on the Immokalee Rd./Randall Blvd. Planning Study Area Map) and make recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners for any proposed changes to the future land uses. The subject property is within the Collier County initiated. Immokalee Rd. Randall Blvd. Planning Study area, which consists of approximately 277 acres +9 miles east and ±5.5 miles north of I75. The purpose of this study was to evaluate existing and future conditions, and recommendations for the study area and establish guiding principles for the development of the area. The completed study concluded that this is an appropriate area for future commercial growth to serve the surrounding community and recommended a mixed -use subdistrict to encourage a mix of retail, restaurant, office, medium density residential, and civic/public uses. The subject property is not large enough to support mixed -use development, as commercial development within the estates requires increased setbacks and buffer areas when adjacent to Estates zoned parcels; however, the proposed subdistrict will provide the commercial goods and services needed to support the increasing density in the surrounding area. The Subdistrict fronts on Immokalee Road and is proposed for commercial uses. The site will. be designed with a pedestrian connection to the existing sidewalk on Immokalee Road, and the site will provide one or more bicycle racks. The proposed subdistrict will also aid in creating a walkable development pattern, as the subdistrict will allow for commercial destinations via a connection to the existing pedestrian facilities along Immokalee Road. The property is within walking distance (approximately half a mile west) of the southwestern corner of Valencia Lakes, a idential subdivision. As the County proceeds to implementation of the nearby res recommendations of the Immokalee Road/Randall Boulevard Planning Study (presumably through a GMP Overlay, and LDC Amendments, as may be acceptable to the Board of County Commissioners) there may be specific requirements related to promoting an enhanced multi -modal network. Please keep in mind that there are significant improvements planned for the intersection if Randall Blvd. and Immokalee Road, including, initially, surface improvements, and ultimately a grade separated intersection (or "flyover") is planned. We will particpate in all of these efforts, and presumably development on the subject property will be subject to any such applicable requirements; however, we cannot drive that process at this point. Consistency with GMP Future Land Use Element Policy 5.5: Discourage unacceptable levels of urban sprawl in order to minimize the cost of community facilities by: confining uNban intensity development to areas designated as Urban... Page 5 of 7 H:\2023\22023025\WP\GMPA\Resubmittal\Exhibit V.D.1 —Narrative and Justification (7-25-2023).docx The subject property is within the Immokalee Rd. Randall Blvd, Study Area, which Collier County concluded to be an appropriate area for the commercial uses necessary to accommodate future growth within the Rural Golden Gate Estates. The property has frontage along Immokalee Road and is adjacent to non-residential uses and the Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict to the east; and is approximately 807' south of the Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict which allows for a variety of commercial, office and residential land uses. As a result, the proposed amendment is consistent with this policy in that it reduces urban sprawl and contains commercial uses in a semi -rural area to a location that is adjacent to existing commercial development. Policy 5.6: New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code (Ordinance 0441, adopted June 22, 2004 and effective October 18, 2004, as amended). The proposed. uses are compatible with anal complementary to the surrounding land uses, which include a North Collier Fire Rescue District Station, commercial uses, and large lot residential development. Development standards and perimeter buffers proposed within the CPUD will ensure compatibility with neighboring properties. Policy 7.1: The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. In accordance with this policy, access is arterial roadway. proposed via a connection to Immokalee Road, a minor Policy 7.2: The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals. The subject site will utilize internal accesses and will connect to Immokalee Road, a minor arterial. roadway. Policy 7:3: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and/or interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. The interconnection of local streets between developments is also addressed in Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element. The subject site will utilize internal accesses and will connect to Immokalee Road, a minor arterial roadway. The property does not have frontage on local streets. The parcels to the south and west are developed with single-family residential and there is a canal along the eastern perimeter, Conservation and Coastal Management Element Policy 6.1.1: For the County's Urban Designated Area, Estates Designated Area, Conservation Designated Area, and Agricultural/Rural Mixed Use District, Rural -Industrial District and Rural - Settlement Area District as designated on the FL UM, native vegetation shall be preserved through Page 6 of 7 H:\2023\2023025\WP\GMPA\Resubtnittal\Exhibit V.D. l —Narrative and Justification (7-25-2023).docx the application of the following minimum preservation and vegetation retention standards and cNiteYia... Non -Coastal Hi h Hazard Area Commercial and Industrial Development Equal to or greater than S acres. 15% There are approximately 5.86 acres of native vegetation present on the site. In accordance with this policy, the project will retain approximately 0.88 acres of existing native vegetation There will be a 50' wide native vegetation retention area along the southern perimeter and a 25' wide native vegetation retention area along the western perimeter. OBJECTIVE 7.1: Direct incompatible land uses away from listed animal species and their habitats. (The County relies on the listing process of State and Federal agencies to identify species that require special protection because of their endangered, threatened, or species of special concern status. Listed animal species are those species that the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission has designated as endangered, threatened, or species of special concern, in accordance with Rules 68A-27.003, 68A-27.004, and 68A-27.005, F.A.C. and those species designated by various federal agencies as Endangered and Threatened species published in SO CFR 17.) According to the Listed Species assessment provided. with this GMPA, there is no evidence or indication that the site is being utilized by any listed species. The 50' wide native vegetation retention area along the southern perimeter and a 25' wide native vegetation retention area along the western perimeter will ensure that suitable habitat will be present on site to direct wildlife from the proposed land uses. Transportation Element Policy 9.3: The County shall encourage projects which provide local resident, pedesti^ian, bicyclist and motorist movement between and among developments on neighborhood stNeets in a deliberate balance with its efforts to route cut -through traffic away fi^om neighborhoods and to the arterials and collectors designated in this Transportation Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. The subject site will utilize internal accesses and will connect to Till mokalee Road, a minor arterial roadway. The property does not have frontage on local streets. The parcels to the south are developed with single-family residential and there is a canal along the eastern perimeter, making interconnection unfeasible. The Master Plan allows for an interconnection to the west if the property is developed with non-residential uses. An internal system of sidewalks will be utilized to facilitate pedestrian and bicycle movement. This system will connect to the existing sidewalk along Immokalee Road. Page 7 of 7 H:\2023\2023025\WP\GMPA\Resubmittal\Exhibit V.D.1 —Narrative and Justification (7-25-2023).docx �� 1 � I'll EXHIBIT V.E.I PUBLIC FACILITIES REPORT The proposed subdistrict does not authorize residential development and does not increase population within the County. Therefore, no significant increased demands on public facilities will occur as a result of approving this request. Collier County Utilities will provide water service for potable and fire protection needs, as well as wastewater service. There is an existing water line and force main to the north of the project, across Immokalee Road. Collier County Public Utilities has sufficient plant capacity to provide water and sewer services. According to the Collier County 2022 AUIR, currently the Collier County Landfill has a total remaining permitted capacity of 12,906,476 tons, and a ten-year permitted capacity requirement of 2,906,534 tons. The estimated life of the landfill is 40 years. This is adequate to accommodate expected tons per capita generated by the proposed prof ect. Stormwater retention and detention will comply with SFWMD standards for off -site discharges will be met, resulting management (drainage) level of service. The site does ditches, or stormwater control structures, n i requirements, and State and County no adverse impacts to stormwater not affect County -maintained canals, No residential development is approved through the subdistrict; therefore, there are no impacts to level of service for schools. The proposed subdistrict will not increase the population and will not increase demands for emergency medical services or county parks and recreation services. An EMS/fire station is located adjacent to the east of the site at 13240 Immokalee Road. The subject site is within the North Collier Fire Rescue District. The proposed amendment does not create any adverse impacts to the area roadway network. The roadway network is projected to operate above the Level of Service (LOS) standard with or without the project at future build -out conditions. Please see the attached Traffic Analysis for transportation impacts and further details. Page 1 of 1 H:\2023\2023025\WP\GMPA\Resubmittal\Exhibit V.E. l -Public Facilities Report (7-25-2023).docx EXHIBIT • . . . . _ • • I iv am Pat 1 r. B-T." a" am Prepared for: Hole Montes &Associates 950 Encore Way Naples, FL 34110 Phone: 239-254-2000 Collier Coun Collier County, Florida �/21/Zo23 Prepared by: Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 2800 Davis Boulevard, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239-566-9551 all: ntrebilcock� Em trebilcock.bi z Transportation Methodology Fee* — $500.00 Fee Collier County Transportation Review Fee* —Major Study — $1,500.00 Fee Note — *to be collected at time of first submittal. Immokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict— GMPA &PUDZApplication — Traffic Impact Statement —July 2023 I certify that this Traffic Impact Statement has been prepared by me or under my immediate supervision and that I have experience and training in the field of Traffic and Transportation Engineering. 2:•• No 47116 �'.• STATE OF00400609 Digitally signed by Norman Trebilcock DN: c=US, st=Florida, 1=Naples, o=Norman Trebilcock, cn=Norman Trebilcock, email=ntrebilcock@trebilcock.biz Date: 2023.07.21 1 /010:44-04'00' Norman Trebilcock, Al PE, PTOE FL Registration No. 47116 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 2800 Davis Boulevard, Suite 200 Naples, FL34104 Company Cert. of Auth. No. 27796 PRINTED COPIES OF THIS DOCUMENT ARE NOT CONSIDERED SIGNED AND SEALED AND THE SIGNATURE MUST BE VERIFIED ON ANY ELECTRONIC COPIES. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 2 1mmOkalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict— GMPA &PODZ Application — Traffic Impact Statement —July 2023 ProjectDescription........................................................................................................................ a 4 Tr i p . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Trip Distribution and Assignment.............................................................................. 5 ............. ........ FUtl,lre BaCkgroUnd Traffic VoIUmeS............................................................................................... 8 Existing and Future Roadway Conditions Without Project............................................................ 8 Future Conditions With Project.................................................................................................... 10 Site Access Management.............................................................................................................. 12 ImprovementAnalysis.................................................................................................................. 12 Mitigationof Impact..................................................................................................................... 12 Appendices Appendix A: Project Master Site Plan.......................................................................................... 13 Appendix B: Initial Meeting Checklist (Methodology Meeting) .................................................. 15 Appendix C: ITE Trip Generation.............................................................. Appendix D: FDOT Generalized Level of Service Table...... 0 asseessee 8 00 @**sea ago a a age* seem moves* assess 33 Appendix E: FDOT Site Impact Handbook......... as Osseo wasseasse a assessesse soma Sasso a swumose was a a a assesses@ B Appendix F: D1RPM Facilities in Vicinity...................................................................................... 38 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page ( 3 ICnMOKolee Randall Commercial Subdistrict— 6MPA &PUDZApplicotion — Traffic Impact Statement —July 2023 Project Description The subject property is located on the south side of Immokalee Road, approximately 773 feet west of the intersection of Immokalee Road and Randall Boulevard and comprises three parcels that total ±9.82 acres in size. Two of the parcels are undeveloped. One parcel is currently owned by Collier County. The County cleared this parcel of vegetation to use for dry retention for Immokalee Rd. The proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) establishes the Immokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict to allow for 125,000 square feet of &3 commercial uses, of which up to 80,000 square feet may consist of Indoor Air -Conditioned Mini and Self -Storage. There is a companion PUD rezoning to ensure compliance with the GMP and the proposed subdistrict. Refer to Figure 1—Project Location and Appendix A: Project Master Site Plan. Immokalee Rd Figure 1—Project Location Project Location ` Vlerket . {�dI1S�3�S S►V{i a Apexx Access Automal CD G Oil Well Rd Randall Blvd Next Generation i=ar,�ily Daycare H©me blest Coast Ge►�eratar N Rarrlall B'::� A methodology memorandum was transmitted via email to the Collier County Transportation Planning staff on April 21, 2023 (ref. Appendix B: Initial Meeting Checklist (Methodology Meeting)). The project access connections to the surrounding roadway network consist of two connections onto Immokalee Rd. The specific project proposed that requires the amendment is expected to be fully constructed and occupied within a few years. The analysis year is 2028. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 4 I nMOKalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict— GMPA &PUDZApplication — Traffic Impact Statement —July 2023 Trip Generation While the proposed amendment is to allow up to 125,000 SF of C-3 uses, the trip generation in Table 1 is for 100,000 SF of mixed retail and is intended to depict the highest and best use and establish the trip cap for the PUD at 389 PM peak hour two-way. Appendix C contains the result for 45,000 SF of mixed retail and 80,000 Sf of self -storage facility. It also contains ITE rates or equations used for the trip generation calculations, as applicable, the ITE formulae coefficients and 11t" edition data pages. In agreement with the Collier County TIS guidelines, significantly impacted roadways are identified based on the proposed project highest peak hour trip generation (net new total trips) and consistent with the peak hour of the adjacent street traffic. Based on the information contained in the Collier County 2022 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR), the peak hour for the adjacent roadway network is PM peak hour. Table 1-Trip Generation Trip Distribution and Assignment Trip distribution was estimated using the Collier County Adopted 2045 Cost Feasible network in the District One Regional Planning Model (D1RPM) modified as follows: 1. Reflecting changes in the vicinity requested by Collier County during the analysis of the Town of Big Cypress; and 2. Reflecting on the number of lanes consistent with construction funding in the current Collier County 5-Year Work Program. The resulting facility type, area type and number of lanes are depicted in Appendix F. Anew traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ)# 2970 was attached to Immokalee Rd. at the project location containing 300 commercial employees (3 per 1000 SF recommended by FDOT Site Impact Handbook -see Appendix E). The percentage distribution pattern for project traffic is shown in Figure 2. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � S Immokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict- GMPA &PUDZApplication - Traffic Impact Statement -July 2023 ' North Figure 2 -Project Trip Distribution I^ 2.6 in 0 'v 0 Immokalee Rd 7.5 6.7 6Y Oil Well Rd 16.8 16.1 N N Project Immokalee Rd N ocation Randall Blvd 20.2 16.2 4�b 11.1 ` 22.4� 20.5 A -' 12.3 24.4 9 5 9.5 `n t0 V a o 0 0 � CDo o0 rn � o � It Beach Rd Ext. Vanderbilt _ 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 o 1.7 2.5 3.9 2.4 0 n o ## Percent of External Pro•ect Traffic 2.6 O 0 2.3 0 Golden Gate blvd C�7 0 6.1 6.7 0 16.1 N Q1 w V 1.4 5.3 6.1 53 1z 0.4 6.1 2.9 0 0 r 6.1 U .�J 5.3 0 w 0 Number of Lanes 2 4 6 8 - 10 Facility Type Toll Facilities Freeways & Ramps Minor & Major Arterials Collectors Centroid Connectors Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 6 IrnnlOKalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict- GMPA &PUDZApplication - Traffic Impact Statement -July 2023 Table 2 contains the road segments on which the project impact was reviewed. Roadway configuration and minimum standard service volumes are from the 2022 AUIR. The distribution percentages are the averages of those at the segment endpoints shown in Figure 2. The calculations that Table 2 contains are performed with more decimal places than those displayed. Using only the displayed decimals may yield slightly different results. The project significantly impacts some roadway segments in the vicinity. Table 2 -Project Traffic Distribution and PM Peak Hour Impact Peak Direct - Peak ion Hour Project PM PM Peak Traffic Percent Peak Peak LOS Direct- Signif- as Per - of Total Hour Hour Mini- ion icance centage Signif- Project Project Project Config- mum Service Thres- of icant AUIR Roadway Traffic Traffic Traffic uration Im- Stan- Volume hold Service Impact ID # Link From To (1) N/E (2) S/W (2) (3) proved dard (3) (%) (4) Volume Y/N Immokalee Wilson Project 45.0 24.4 46 49 6D No E 3300 2 1.5 No Road Boulevard Entrances Immokalee Project Randall 45.0 75.6 150 144 6D No E 3300 2 4.5 Yes Road Entances Boulevard Immokalee Randall Oil Well 45.0 48.7 97 92 6D No E 3300 2 2.9 Yes Road Boulevard Road Immokalee Oil Well 39th Ave 46.0 24.1 48 46 4D No D 2000 3 2.4 No Road Road NE Immokalee 39th Ave 47th Ave 46.0 1901 38 36 2U No D 900 3 4.2 Yes Road NE NE Immokalee 47th Ave Everglades 46.0 10.8 21 21 2U No D 900 3 2.3 No Road NE Blvd. Vanderbilt 118.0 Wilson Blvd Immokalee Beach 8.3 16 16 2U No D 900 2 1.8 No Road Road Ext. Oil Well Immokalee Everglades 119.0 16.5 33 31 4D No D 2200 3 1.5 No Road Road Boulevard Randall Immokalee 8th Street 132.0 22.4 45 42 2U No D 900 2 5.0 Yes Boulevard Road NE Randall 8th Street Everglades 132.0 18.4 37 34 2U No D 900 3 4.1 Yes Boulevard NE Blvd. Randall Everglades Desoto 133.0 2.9 6 5 2U No D 900 3 0.7 No Boulevard Boulevard Boulevard Everglades Randall Oil Well 135.0 1.5 3 3 2U No D 800 3 0.4 No Boulevard Boulevard Road Vanderbilt Everglades Randall 135.0 Beach 7.6 14 16 2U No D 800 3 2.0 No Boulevard Boulevard Road Ext. Everglades Oil Well Immokalee 136.0 2.4 5 4 2U No D 800 3 0.6 No Boulevard Road Road Notes: 1) Average of segment endpoint values in Figure 2 2) Percentage times PM peak hour net new external directional project traffic totals Table 1 3) Based on 2022 AUIR data 4) Collier County TIS Guidelines Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page ( 7 ll'1'In OKolee Randall Commercial Subdistrict— G1VlPA &PUDZApplication — Traffic Impact Statement —July 2023 Tables 3 through 5 contain information for the significantly impacted roadway segments in Table 2 demonstrating their current and future levels of service. In Table 3, the annual growth rate listed is the one used in the 2022 AUIR to predict future deficiencies and is used to inflate the existing year peak hour peak direction volume from the 2022 AUIR for the first five years, with two percent growth (consistent with the method used in the AUIR) thereafter. The result above is compared with the 2022 AUIR volume plus the trip bank volume. The higher of the two results is used as the future background traffic volume. The calculations that Table 3 contains are performed with more decimal places than those displayed. Using only the displayed decimals may yield slightly different results. Table 3 —Future Background Traffic 2028 2028 Growth Rate Existing Based Peak Year Peak Hour Peak AUIR Hour Peak Hour Annual Peak Direct - Peak Percent Direction ion Back- Direct- Growth Trip Back- AUIR + ground ion Peak Rate for Growth Bank ground Trip Traffic AUIR Roadway Volume Direct- First 5 Factor Volume Traffic Bank Volume ID # Link From To (1) ion (1) years (1) (2) (1) Volume Volume (3) Immokalee Project Randall 45.0 2020 E 2.0% 1.126 498 2275 2518 2518 Road Entances Boulevard Immokalee Randall Oil Well 45.0 2020 E 2.0% 1.126 498 2275 2518 2518 Road Boulevard Road Immokalee 39th Ave 47th Ave 46.0 510 E 4.0% 1.241 252 633 762 762 Road NE NE Randall Immokalee 8th Street 132.0 780 E 2.0% 1.126 25 878 805 878 Boulevard Road NE Randall 8th Street Everglades 132.0 780 E 2.0% 1.126 25 878 805 878 Boulevard INE I Blvd. Notes: 1) 2022 AUIR 2) Growth Factor assumes 2% annual growth after the first 5 years. 3) Greater of Growth based estimate or Existing + Trip Bank The existing roadway conditions are from the Collier County 2022 AUIR, and the future roadway conditions are based on the current Collier County 5-Year Work Program. Roadway improvements that are currently under construction, scheduled to be constructed within the five-year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) or Capital Improvement Program (CIP) are considered committed improvements. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 8 Immokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict— GMPA &PUDZApplication — Traffic Impact Statement —July 2023 This includes the improvement of the Immokalee Rd./Randall Blvds intersection that is reflected here by treating the segment from Immokalee Rd. to 8t" St NE as a four lane facility. For any existing roads scheduled for improvement, the roadway service volumes in the improved condition are the Collier County AUIR unimproved condition service volume multiplied by the ratio of LOS D service volumes shown in FDOT Generalized Service Volume Table 7 (Urban Condition, Class I Arterial, Appendix D) between the improved and unimproved cross sections (product rounded to the nearest hundred). Ex ratios: • 2 lanes to 4 = 2,000/880 = 2.27 • 2 lanes to 6 = 3,020/880 = 3.43 • 4 lanes to 6 = 3,020/2,000 = 1.51 That ratio isolates the effect of the additional lanes while keeping all other factors affecting service volumes constant. The effect of all those other factors is reflected in the County's published service volume in the unimproved condition and explains its relation to the average for all roads of like cross section. The existing and future roadway conditions are illustrated in Table 4. The segments are operating at acceptable level of service in existing conditions and under future background traffic conditions. The calculations that Table 4 contains are performed with more decimal places than those displayed. Using only the displayed decimals may yield slightly different results. Table 4 —Existing and Future Roadway Conditions 2022 2028 2028 2028 2028 2028 Existing Existing Peak Peak Year Peak Hour Hour Peak Level Hour Peak Level Peak Hour of Peak Direct- of Direct- Peak Service Direct- ion Back Service Existing ion Direct- Exist- Defic- Future ion ground Back- Defic- Config- Service ion ing iency Config- Service Traffic ground iency AUIR Roadway uration Volume Volume Year Yes/ uration Im- Volume Volume Traffic Yes/ ID # Link From To (1) (1) (1) V/C No (1) proved (1) (2) V/C No Immokalee Project Randall 45.0 6D 3300 2020 0.61 No 6D No 3300 2518 0.76 No Road Entances Boulevard Immokalee Randall Oil Well 45.0 6D 3300 2020 0.61 No 6D No 3300 2518 0.76 No Road Boulevard Road Immokalee 47th Ave 46.0 39th Ave NE 2U 900 510 0.57 No 2U No 900 762 0.85 No Road NE Randall Immokalee 8th Street 132.0 2U 900 780 0.87 No 4D Yes 2000 878 0.44 No Boulevard Road NE Randall 8th Street Everglades 132.0 2U 900 780 0.87 No 2U No 900 878 0.98 No Boulevard 1NE I Blvd. Notes: 1) Based on 2022 AUIR data and approved future roadway improvements 2) Table 3 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 9 Immokalee Randall commercial Subdistrict— GMPA &PUDZApplication — Traffic Impact Statement —July 2023 Future Conditions With Project Table 5 adds the project traffic volumes developed in Table 2 to the 2028 background traffic volumes developed in Table 3. In the cases where the peak direction of project traffic aligns with the peak direction of background traffic, the background traffic portion of the total traffic is the peak hour peak direction volume from Table 3. In the cases where the two peak directions (background and project) are opposed, a D factor of 0.56 is assumed for the background traffic, the average of the values used for interrupted flow facilities in the FDOT Generalized Service Volume Table for Urbanized Areas (see Appendix D). This factor is used to estimate the background two-way volume, and hence to establish the two directional components of that two-way volume. Directional project traffic volumes from Table 2 are added and the maximum of the resulting two total traffic directional volumes is used as the basis of analysis. The calculations that Table 5 contains are performed with more decimal places than those displayed. Using only the displayed decimals may yield slightly different results. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 10 (D C" c� O n 717 O ool LA C r+ rQ V) O o' Mmi Cr 2028 2028 2028 2028 Peak Hour Peak Direct- Peak Level ion Back- PM PM Back- Hour of r� tJ'1 0 v O a� A 0 Immokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict— GMPA &PUDZApplicarion — Traffic Impact Statement —July 2023 The project traffic causes a level of service deficiency on the segment of Randall Blvd. from 8t" St NE to Everglades Blvd. • ♦ •111111 W• • • The proposed access for the project is an eastbound right in/right out connection to Immokalee Rd. at the western end of the parcel (see Appendix A) and right-out/emergency access at the eastern end. Immokalee Rd. is considered an Access Class 3 facility with a posted speed limit of 45 mph. As such the minimum spacing requirement is 660 feet. A detailed evaluation of applicable access points will be performed at the time of site development permitting/platting when more specific development parameters will be made available. Based on the results illustrated within this traffic analysis, the proposed project creates a significant impact on adjacent roadway segments. Most of the analyzed roadway network facilities have sufficient capacity to accommodate the proposed project. On Randall Blvd. from 8t" A NE to Everglades Blvd the project traffic creates a deficiency in 2028. The ROW acquisition for this segment is funded in FY 23. No further phases show funding in the adopted work program. The maximum total daily trip generation for the proposed development shall not exceed 389 two-way PM peak hour net new trips, based on the land use codes in the ITE Trip Generation Manual in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval, as applicable. Mitigation of Impact The developer proposes to conduct a proportionate share analysis and pay the resulting amount if it exceeds expected impact fees or pay the appropriate Collier County Road Impact Fee as building permits are issued for the project, as applicable. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 12 Irnmokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict— GMPA &PUD2Application — Traffic Impact Statement —July 2023 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 13 WWI C' mmmmmmmm n 0 D Ln r-=r' rq L/) O O D 11 � I I ¢I Q U ., SCAwE IN 7EET el z 1 N ZONING: E-ST/V1l-4 '� O r.: ' ' LAND USE: UNDEVELOPED wo Z� 11wFes. gyp. O `>> f , p 'ow, ZONING: E-ST/W--4 O� ........w LAND USE: SINGLE-FAMILY f r f RESIDENTIAL f ---- fGAN= f r mmm� J_ 0-0 f�- - -•-• • ... --wl aw - -- -------- GHT-�NfRIGHY r-- r+~ II I aSz Rl i Q --- - ----- OUT ONLY IN r L � W w G w 0 O monj w n z wW �Wn zo zz og 25.0' RETAINED NATIVE VEG ETATI O N BUFFER i ZONING: E-ST/W 3 LAND USE: SINGLE-FAMILY ! RESIDENTIAL TRACT C �1 (DEVELOPABLE AREA TRACT B IMMOKALEE RANDALL CPUD 50.0' RETAINED NATIVE VEGETATION BUFFER 15.0 ENHANCED TYPE D LBE �I I �I I I �I 76.0' it DRAINAGE EASEMENT ZONING: E-ST/VI!-4 LAND USE: FUTURE COLLIER COUNTY STORM WATER MANAGEMENT LAKE H.A+L 4:'2023 QL MONTES � I I ZONING: E-ST/V11-4 (CU) LAND USE: NORTH COLLIER FIRE RESCUE I 'DISTRICT STATION 10 5.0'TYPEA LBE ' 20.0' ACCESS TO COUNTY OVVN E D I PARCEL FOR I CANAL MAINT. owl I LAND USE SUMMARY (RETAINED NATIVE VEGETATION BUFFER) TRACT B 1.24 AC TRACT C 8.62 AC TOTAL 9.86 AC MIN. OPEN SPACE REQUIRED/PROVIDED (30%): 3.13 AC MIN. NATIVE VEGETATION RETENTION REQUIREDIPROVIDED: 0.88 AC TRACT B RETAINS NATIVE VEGETATION &SHALL PROVIDE THE REQUIRED , MINIMUM NATIVE VEGETATION RETENTION OF 0.88 AC 1.+:r rOPTXS?.:Gfl EXHIBIT C MASTER PLAN I LAND USE SUMMARY (RETAINED NATIVE VEGETATION BUFFER) TRACT B 1.24 AC TRACT C 8.62 AC TOTAL 9.86 AC MIN. OPEN SPACE REQUIRED/PROVIDED (30%): 3.13 AC MIN. NATIVE VEGETATION RETENTION REQUIREDIPROVIDED: 0.88 AC TRACT B RETAINS NATIVE VEGETATION &SHALL PROVIDE THE REQUIRED , MINIMUM NATIVE VEGETATION RETENTION OF 0.88 AC 1.+:r rOPTXS?.:Gfl EXHIBIT C MASTER PLAN MIN. OPEN SPACE REQUIRED/PROVIDED (30%): 3.13 AC MIN. NATIVE VEGETATION RETENTION REQUIREDIPROVIDED: 0.88 AC TRACT B RETAINS NATIVE VEGETATION &SHALL PROVIDE THE REQUIRED , MINIMUM NATIVE VEGETATION RETENTION OF 0.88 AC 1.+:r rOPTXS?.:Gfl EXHIBIT C MASTER PLAN Immokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict— GMPA &PUDZApplication — Traffic Impact Statement —July 2023 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 15 Imn'lokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict— GMPA &PUD2Application — Traffic Impact Statement —July 2023 Suggestion: Ilse this ,A�ppendi:c as a worksheet to ensure that no hnportai�t elements azre overlooked. Cross out the items that do not apply, or N/A (not applicable). Date:ri121.2, i�23 Titne: N/.A Location: N/A — Via Email People Attending: Name, Organization, and Telephone Numbers 1) �►lichael Sabi 2) Norman Trebilcock, TCS 3) Gavin .Tones, TCS �) Ciprian Malaescu, TCS Study Prepares Preparer's Name and Title: Norman Trebilcock. AICP. PE Organization: Trebilcock Consulting Solutions. PA Address & Telephone Number: 2800 Davis Boulevard. Suite 200, Naples, FL 34104; ph 239-566-9551 Reviewer(s): Reviewer's Name & Title: Michael SawyTer Organization & Telephone Number: Collier County Transportation Development Review 239-252-2926 Applicant: Applicant's Name: Hole Montes Address: 950 Encore Way. Naples, FL 34110 Telephone Number: 239-254-2000 Proposed Development. Name: hnmokalee Randall Sub District Location: South side of Immokalee Rd. 012roximately 773 feet west of the intersection of I nmokalee Rd. and Randall Blvd. (refer to Figure 1) Land Use Type: C-3 Commercial Uses. ITE Code #: LUC 821 — Shopping Plaza 40K-150K without Supermarket, LUC 151 — ini-Warehotise. Page 1 of 6 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 16 Irr)mokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict— GMP,4 &PUDZApplication — Traffic Impact Statement —July 2023 Dcscl-iption: 125,000 sgtlarc feet (SF} of C-3 L?ses. atee I .S Figure 1— Projecfi Locafiion Map [Atli A� NE ZUI11I1 E�15t1116: Estates- -lined Use District, Residential Compreliens1Ve plan recommendation: N/A. Requested: zvel Kendall �Ivb es Subdistrict. Gro`Nrth Mallacyement Plan Amendment (G�1PA to allow for up to 125,UUU SF of C-3 llsc;s. :7. anci Pl,�nnecl I ?nit Filldillgs of the Prelill�inary Study: StLldy type: Tile projected net el-ternal AI�-I or Ph12-��ay peak hour project traffic is more tllall lUU. SO this studj' ualifies as a XZajor TIS. Proposed TIS «'ill IllcllldZ trip �ellet'1t10I1, tl'aff1C dlsti'illtltl011 alld a.Ssl�ilnlZllts. s1�111�1cal1CZ test (basedcriterion}. Operational site access analysis to be perforllled at the timz of'site development plats application. 1�lle repol-t x.x ill proV ide esistin� LOS and doctllllent the impact tlla proposed project ��jill slave on designated �u-terial and collector roads. will] IZOad�Vam` cOnC111�I'Z11C` analysis -- b; ei Z�[cl�tla rlllc TIS shall be consistent withh Collier County J IS Citlldellllcs and I'rUGCdtll•eS. c Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 17 Immokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict— GMPA &PUD2Application — Traffic Impact Statement —July 2023 Site access is �=ia access f'ron� Inuno�.alee R.d. Internal capture is not applicable and tlne pass-b�� rate is based on ITE and Collier County . . , . 4 Study Typc: (if not. net increase, operational study) Small Scale TIS ❑ Minor TIS ❑ Major TIS Study Area: Boundaries: Arterial and Collector roads significantl, impacted. Additional intersections to be analyzed: NIA Build Out Year: 2028 Planning Horizon Fear: 2028 Analysis Time Period(s): PM peak hour Future tiff --Site Developments: N/A Source of Trip Generation dates: ITE Trip Generation Manual, l lt` Edit, None : NIA Pass -by trips: per TIS Guidelines Internal trips: NIA Transit use: N/A Qtlzer: NIA izon Non -site traffic estunates: Collier C Site -trip generation: ITE ll�' Edition LUC Supermarket. LUC I � 1 —Mini-Warehouse. F SF ofretail and $tJ=AAA SF of s Trip distribution method: District 1 Re Traffic assignment method: project trit Traffic growth rate: historical — Slnoppin� Plaza �� — lSfll� without inaton _analyzed that Tonal Flaruuna Model - refer to Fi rate or 2°'o minimum fewer trigs i 2. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 18 Immokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict— GMPA &PUD2Applicotion — Traffic Impact Statement —July 2023 Turning movements: Site Access: ; the site development elan aDnlicati Figw•e 2 —Project Trig Distribution u, a y io y� C C E¢ � Q v ro EVERGLADE L `o EVERGLADES 4.9 0 N Tt (O m d F- Ui 10.3 4.9 4.1 2 9 EvERGLP.DES g F" EVERGLADES EVERGLADES EV[RGlACES u J z un r� Gp u m Q c r_ p Ion K J W d u 16TH 16TH 0 0 0 co� �, �I.1 16TH I ,6 rfy 16TH C O Lei Zj p c N 4 > � J 0 co O0 0 0 �1 r�AiOWWIIM14MLEE �T)VM 27.4 t 44.200 ra, a �? e � s �r- r WILSON BL 0 0 t 6,9 2,a 9.7 6A W115% BL '�, wiLSON BL A LL1 r � N O� v� S sb c 2 Page 4 of 6 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 19 Irnmokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict— GMPA &vuuz Application — Traffic Impact Statement —July 2023 Special Fea�,(from preliminary study or prior experience} Accident locations: N/A Sight distance: N/A ueuing: N/A Access location & configuration: N/A Traffic control: MUTCD Siginal system location & progression needs: NIA On -site parking needs: N/A Data Sources: CC 2 Base maps: N!A Prior study reports: N/A Access policy and jurisdiction: N/A Review process: N/A Requiremelnts: N/A Miscellaneous: N/A Shall Scale Study — No Fee Minor Study - S750.00 Major Study - $1,500.04 Methodology Fee $500.00 Includes (i intersections Additional Intersections - $54a.OQ each c All fees will be agreed to wring the gleihodology meeting and must be pant to Transportation prior to our sign -off on the application. SI�NATUF�ES Study Preparer—Dorman Trebilcocl� Revie�ver�s) Applicant Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 20 Immokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict— GMPA &PUDZApplication — Traffic lmpact Statement —July 2023 Collier County Traffic Impact Study Review Fee Schedule Fees will be paid incrementally as the development proceeds: Methodology Review, Analysis Review, and Sufficiency Reviews. Fees for additional meetings or other optional services are also provided below. t� e lti%thodology Review includes review of a submitted methodology statement, including review of submitted trip generation estimate(s), distribution, assignment, and review of a "Small Scale Study" determination, written approval/comments on a proposed methodology statement, and written confirmation of a re -submitted, amended methodology statement, and one meeting in Collier County, if needed. ;`Small Scale Study" Review - No Additional Fee (Includes one sufficiency review) Upon approval of the methodology review, the applicant may submit the study. The review includes: a coneurrency determination, site access inspection and confirmation of the study compliance with trip generation, distribution and maximum threshold compliance. "Minor StudyReview" - $75Q Fee {Includes one sufficiency review) Review{ of the submitted traffic analysis includes: optional field visit to site, confirmation of trip generation, distribution, and assignment, concurrency determination, confirmation of coininitted improvements, review of traffic volume data collected/assembled, review of of site improvements within the righof-way, revi tew of site access and circulation, and preparation and review of "sufficiency" comments/questions. "Maier Study Review" - 51,5Ufl Fee (Includes two intersection analysis and two sufficiency Reviex,xr of the submitted tl-affic analysis includes: field visit to site, confirmation of trip generation, special trip generation and/or trip length study, distribution and assignment, concurrency determination, confirmation of committed improvements, review of traffic volume data collected/assembled, review of traffic growth analysis, review of off site roadway operations and capacity analysis, review of site access and circulation, neighborhood traffic intrusion issues, any necessary improvement proposals and associated cost estimates, and preparation and review of up to two rounds of "sufficiency" comments/questions and/or recommended conditions of approval. cr ti dditinn a1 inttarenrtinn `Rawinw" _ The review of additional intersections shall include file same parameters as outlined in the `��iajor Study Revisal" and shall apply to each intersection above the first two intersections included in the "major Study Review" "Additional Su Additional sufficiency reviews beyond those initially included in the appropriate study shall require the additional Fee prior to the completion of the review. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 21 Immokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict— GMPA &PUDZApplication — Traffic impact Statement —July 2023 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 22 Shopping Plaza 40K-150K - 821 N 1000 SF 45.000 1 1 1 Total 37038 115 119 234 48 30 78 Supermarket No External I 1 115 1 119 1 234 I 48 i 30 I 78 Net New 1 1 I 86 i 89 1175 1 I 36 I 22 i 58 (Mini -Warehouse I 151 ( 1000 SF 180.000 1 1 1 1 1 1 (Total 1 116 1 1 6 1 6 1 12 I 1 4 1 3 1 7 40 � 25 � 65 Trip Generation Rates from ITE Trip Generation Manual 11th Ed. Pass -by Capture volume based on lesser of: A) Rate per ITE Trip Generation Handbook 3rd Ed.; or B) County maximum allowable rate Daily Internal Capture and Pass -by Capture is sum of AM and PM Peak Period results Immokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict— GMPA &PUD2Application — Traffic Impact Statement —July 2023 iAD Description A mini -warehouse is a building in which a number of storage units or vaults are rented for the storage of goods. They are typically referred to as "self -storage" facilities, Each unit is physically separated from other units, and access is usually provided through an overhead door or other common access point. The technical appendices provide supporting information on time -of -day distributions for this land use. The appendices can be accessed through either the I I I ripGen web app or the trip generation resource page on the ITE website (https://www.ite.or ltechnica!,resources/topics/trip: ..... .......... and.parkinc .cenerationl,�. The sites were surveyed in the 1980s, the 1990s, the 2000s, and the 2010s in California, Colorado, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, Texas, and Utah. 212, 403) 551, 568, 642, 708, 724, 850, 868, 876, 1024, 1035 �. r r. r ' r 11 1 • • � Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 24 Imrr OKOIee Randall Commercial Subdistrict— GMPA &PUDZApplication — Traffic Impact Statement —July 2023 I11 I Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA On a: Weeitday Setting/Location: General Urban�Suburban Number of Studies: 16 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA: 55 Directional Distribution: 50°lo entering, 50°� exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 4 200 �n j 1.45 0.38 - 3.25 X X X ' ; ; / X � / x ; / X ♦ ; ♦ ; ! x x ' / I ,x X XX ' x ' ; 200 X Study Site Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 110 Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition • Valume 3 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 25 lmmokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict— GMPA &PUDZApplication — Traffic Impact Statement —July 2023 I, Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1Q00 Sq. Ft. GFA On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. SettingiLocaton: General UrbanlSuburban Number of Studies: 13 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. (..FA* 70 Directional Distribution: 59% entering, 41% exiting O.04 - 0.17 , , 1 1 i / , 1 1 1 00 X r r� r ; 1 X it A 00 X X X 1 1 X � 40 X X 1 X Study Site Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA V.OS Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 26 Immokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict— GMPA &PUDZ,4pplication — Traffic Impact Statement —July 2023 r Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 10fl8 �q. Ft. GFA •Hour Between j and . Setting/Location: General UrbanlSuburban Number of Studies: 18 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA: 59 Directional Distribution: 47°I° entering, 53°!o exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 1 112 0015 C[il m 20 10 Standard Deviation 0.02 - 0.64 f f f f !'1 f f X xf � f / I �r 00 • ; I � !� f X,r r ' X Xago ; �iCSC X X r / ' X v X X Study Site Fitted Curve Equa#ion: N©t Given 100 X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA Trip generation Manual 11th Edition •Volume 3 - - - - -Average Rate Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 27 Immokolee Randall Commercial Subdistrict— GMPA &PUDZApplication — Traffic Impact Statement —July 2023 i * ••• • • . integrated group • • establishments • r• developed, wned, and managed as a unit. Each study site in this land use has between 40)000 and 150,000 - • r r feet gross leasable rr. rr• area t r term • • in r . • r « rather r "center" is simply a means of distinction between the different shopping center size ranges. Various other names are commonly used to categorize a shopping plaza within this size range, depending on its specific size and tenants, such as neighborhood center, community center, and fashion center. Its major tenant is often a supermarket but many sites are anchored by home improvement, discount, or other stores. A shopping plaza typically contains more than retail merchandising facilities. Office space, a movie theater, restaurants, a post office, banks, a health club, and recreational facilities are common tenants. A shopping plaza is almost always open-air and the GLA is the same as the gross floor area of the building. The 150,000 square feet GLA threshold value between shopping plaza and shopping center (Land Use )IQ based on an examination of trip generation data. For a shopping plaza that is smaller than the threshold value, the presence or absence of a supermarket within the plaza has a measurable effect on site trip generation. For a shopping center that is larger than the threshold value, the trips generated by its other major tenants mask any effects of the presence or absence of an on -site supermarket. The 40,000 square feet GFA threshold between shopping plaza and strip retail plaza (Land Use 822) was selected based on an examination of the overall shopping center/plaza database. No shopping plaza with a supermarket as its anchor is smaller than 40,000 square feet GLA. Shopping center (>150k) (Land Use 820), strip retail plaza (<40k) (Land Use 822), and factory outlet center (Land Use 823) are related uses.. Land Uae Subcategory The presence or absence of a supermarket in a shopping plaza has been determined to have a measurable effect on site trip generation. Therefore, data are presented for two subcategories for this land use: sites with a supermarket anchor and sites without a supermarket. Additiona! Data The technical appendices provide supporting information on time -of -day distributions for this land use. The appendices can be accessed through either the ITETripGen web app or the trip generation resource page on the ITE website (https:l/www.ite.org/technical-resources/topics/trip: and :parking-generation/). ..... ............. ..................... ....... ........ . ................ General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 8fl0-999} '197 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 28 Immokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict- GMPA &PUDZApplication - Traffic Impact Statement -July 2023 The sites were surveyed in the 1980s, the 1990s, the 2000s, and the 2010s in Alberta (CAN), British Columbia (CAN), California, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, Ontario (CAN), Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, and Wisconsin. 105, 110, 156, 159, 186, 19$, 204, 211, 213, 239, 259, 260, 295, 3Q1, 304, 305, 307, 317, 319, 358, 376, 390, 400, 4041 4371 444, 446, 5071 580, 598, 658, 728, 908, 926, 944, 946, 9601 973, 974, 1004, 1009, 1025, 1069 198 Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition Volume 5 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Immokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict— GMPA &PUDZApplication — Traffic Impact Statement —July 2023 • Vehicle Trip Ends vsm. rrr Settingl�ocation: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 7 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA: 59 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting Vehicle Trip Generafiion per 1 nnn Sq. Ft. Goa 212 5000 // 1 67.52 43.29 - 91.06 1925 r X X 1 1 1 ; ; x1 1 1 X i r r X i i r { ; ; i / 1 1 1 i ; , , 1 1 ; 1 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 1 1 1 , , 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 0 0 20 X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA X Study Site Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition •Volume 5 - - - - -Average Rate Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 30 Immokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict— GMPA &P(JDZApplication — Traffic Impact Statement —July 2023 Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA t)n a: Weekday, •Hour Between 7 and9 Settingl�ocatian: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 13 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA: 67 Directional Distribution: 62% entering, 38% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1 nnn Sq. Ft. GLA 1.73 200 0.29 - 3.77 X ; OF v ; J r, J: J . ; x OF X X00 r topJ� x A ; ; X X 1.06 0 0 100 200 X = 1000 5q. Ft. GLA X Study Site Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given W_ Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 31 Immokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict— GMPA &PUUZApplication — Traffic Impact Statement —July 2U23 i 1 ! i got' • • • r r III r + On a: Weekday, • Hour Between 4 and SettinglLoca#ion: General UrbanlSuburban Number of Studies: 42 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA: 79 Directional Distribution: 49%entering, 51 °� exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA UUM 214 1000 4D0 200 2. 55 - 15.31 Standard Deviation 2.28 X ; i X ' I X; Ot r r ' r r X X` r .► X X ---- ------...----..... -- -- ,r=0 -- -3- -------- -- - -- ---- X XX Xx �. r XX X XX X . x OX ,X Xx x X Study Site Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition • Valume 5 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 32 Immokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict— GMPA &PUD2Application — Traffic lmpact Statement —July 2023 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 33 Immokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict— GMPA &PUDZApplication — Traffic Impact Statement —July 2023 T ALE 7 G enera li zed �qv�dak i-i%Jur �i re%0 1 anal ' �a lum es far FI on da's Urbanized Areas STATE SI�NALIZEI� ARTERIALS FRE E�TA�S ClassI (40 rnp1-i or higl'ier posted speed limit) i Core Urbanized Lanes Median B C D E Lames B C D E 1 Undivided * 830 880 ** 2 27230 37100 321740 4,080 2 Divided * 12910 221000 ** 3 37280 47570 57620 67130 3 Divided * 2,940 3,020 ** 4 471310 6,030 721490 82170 4 Divided * 37970 4,040 ** 5 5390 7,430 92370 107220 Class II (35 mph or slower posted speed limit) 6 67390 82990 117510 127760 L ane s M e di an B C D E Urb anima 1 Undivided * 370 750 800 Lanes B C D E 2 Divided * 730 12630 1,700 2 2,270 3,100 351890 4,230 3 Divided * 17170 27520 27560 3 37410 42,650 52780 6,340 4 Divided * 1,610 3,390 3,420 4 4,550 6,200 7,680 81460 5 57690 7,760 97520 10,570 Non.StateSignalized Roadway Adjustments Freeway Adjustments (Albejrconesporxdi.nZ stale vchnaes Auxiliary Ramp bythe indicated percent.) Lane IVbtering Ikon-8 tate Signalized Roa,di3vays -100/0 + 1,000 +5% Median &Turn Lane Adjustments UNINTERRUPTED FLOW HIGHWAYS Ex lusrre ExcluSir,e Adjustment Lang s IVkdiarL Le fl Lanes Right Lanes Factors Lanes I II e di an B C D E 1 Divded Yes No +5% 1 Undivided 580 890 1,200 17610 1 Undwiced too No -2UyFO 2 Divided 17800 27600 31280 37730 IVUti Undivided Yes NO -5% 3 Divided 2,700 37900 4,920 5,600 VUti Undivided No NO -25% 0 — — Yes + 0 Uninterrupted Flow Highway Adjustments Lanes Median Exclusprre lefl lanes Adjustment factors One -Way Facility Adjustment 1 Divided Yes +5Vo Multiply the cozresponding directional Multi Undivided Yes -5°110 vohnnes in this tab le b y 1.2 Multi Undivided No -25% BICYCLE M4T}E2 'V. je,5 d•Lrlymilire pxts��ted�tleab:rv�addaectsnal�rol�e: for IneL41f sexrice end (tl,�hiltiply vplaclp vahlrres shavmb elr�r by rnlrt� er of are fortle Z��,7u,.obiLy.tnlc�: madrs irl.}e a spy cYil:alt;T stand. Tlti.: tib)e doer riot dirncticrilal rc�d�xaylees to deitelnTine two-vraym�xirrnunsexvi,oe crsetb� astu&zduLdciculdbeused o k-rfar gay�mlpl�itu:dr1� a�licaiis�:.The cl mTrit�r mo&Lc from 17t l6 :htl'li tlblf is c=ed duouldbe usy dfar more 5pecfir vohunes.) phndigWh.wkiLs.Ile table;uiddutmgcemFn=mode l; _:hlmhn cltbe ixvdfor P ave d conrilkI Ir iLrgy matt &.cL'� T,Ahere more reIRU2dIT! C) tlll7les exit. C a1:lila6ze are barednriplu-irdr .awfitaiions cf the H�.IY[ crudty. Tranid ftw k)y and Q 1r)TQ S aoulderfBicycle Service IAUALM1. Lane C overage B C D E Il'm1ofeuviceforthebiTgcle uLdpedearianmo&5 inthlstable kbwda:L 0 - 49 °fo * 150 390 17 00 0 unmber of irdLles,notnmber of tac'vc ltw: clrprdestri3ns 1xitit1•e fuffity. 50-84% 110 340 1000 >1000 ' ' btixes:perkns�hnnUe QrkTfar$4Lepe6.*h)11iatle :14e diWk0.C6XLof theLr07irtraffr 85-100% 470 1,000 >1,000 ** flanr. PE DE STRIAN M ODE' � • camcrtbe arhievedussrgtablhputvdu e dEfauu}s. (Multiply vehicle vahitne; shwarnbelvw b y nirrib er of ++ Not applicable far tYe21aae1 of service ]ettas grs,dp. Fcstle s1mo6aI mods, dirEctiamal io�way fares � detf�trix�e i?ara-way ma�an�um service noimle: �yatrrtl•►u� )reel of ser?i:e rl beC�ime F berauip Y�~r� cti,�21 ca�a:ciif's lave vahlxttes.) be�sLrealded. Fort1v biqlchmode, A•uy hvelIttergrlilde (hyblditt.F)ISncl 1 afl•tievible becaixe t1vn is rLo mv:mima v4dcls vohm e tltpsl�oli�l_�� .table itput Sidewalk Coverage B C D E Maws. 0-49% * * 140 480 50-84% 80 440 800 Florik D ep mim at of Tra at&bn 85-100% 200 540 990 > 17000 lAn'�� �plym '0r` Gffiem11 x arflilt f7rrFdumir sN-ip BU S Ike OD E (Sehed uled Fixed Ro ute? (Buses in peak li= in peal; directi* i Sidewalk Coverage B C D E ! 0-84% > 5 4 3 2 85-100% >4 >3 >2 >1 I IILL ILL VI L'Lltl I'+i l- 11fY7v L•v NJll Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 34 In'lmokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict- GMPA &PUDZ Application - Traffic Impact Statement -July 2023 (continued) G enerali zed P Hour �I rOCt10�11 1{olurrI es far FI on da'S � rbani zed Areas Janua n� Z�Z� IUT VALUE INPUT ASSUMPTIONS Uninterrupted Flow Facilities Irate ted Fbw Facilities State Artpmiz r= Class I Freeways con Fn evmfs HighrraTs Class I Clams II Bi,cyTls Peieshiam ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Area t; (urban, viral) urban urban Number of through lanes (both dir) 440 4-12 2 4-8 2 4-8 4 4 Posted speed (mph) 70 65 50 50 30 30 45 45 Free flow spe ed (mph) 75 70 55 55 35 35 50 50 Auxil' Lanes (r n n Idn Median (d, t4;rlt, n, n r) r n r r r Terrain (l,r) 1 1 1 1 1 % no s gr zone 80 Exclusive left turn lane impact (n, y) In] Ex clusri Ve right turn lanes (n, y) n rL n n n n Facility le rg th (mi) 3 3 5 5 2 2 1.9 1.8 2 2 TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS Planning analysis hour factor (lt') 0.090 0.085 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 Directional distribution factor(D) 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.550 0.560 0.565 0.560 0.565 0.565 Peak hour factor(PHF 0.95 0.95 a.95 a.95 1.000 1.aa0 1,000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Base saturation flour rate (pcphpl) 27400 2,400 17700 2,2aa 1,95a 17950 17950 17950 17950 17950 Hea.ryvel&le percent 4.0 4.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.5 2.0 S reed Adjustment Factor (S AF) 0.975 0.975 0.975 Capacity Adjustment Fa,ctor(CAF) 0.968 0.968 0.968 • left turns 12 12 12 12 12 12 • right turns 12 12 12 12 12 12 CONTROL CHARACTERISTICS Dumber of signals 4 4 10 10 4 6 Arrival type (1-6) 3 3 4 4 4 4 S ignaI type (a, c, p) c c c c c c Cycle length (C) 120 150 120 120 120 120 Effe ctive ree n ratio (gfQ 0.44 0.45 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 11rFULTIMODAL CHARACTERISTICS Pasted shoulderlbicyule lane (r y) n, 50a/4, Y n Outside lane width (r t, w) t t Fa��rernent condition (d, t, u) t On -street parking (n, y) S ide walk (r n, 50¢�4, Side uralkhoadway separation(a, t, ur) t Side walk protective barrier (n, y) lit I I I I n LEVEL OF SERVICE TITRE SHOLD S Level of Sez ice Freeways Hijar tways Arterials Bicycle Ped Bus De rLAty Two -La Multilane Class I Class II Sc ore Score Busesilnr. °gaff's Density ats ats B <17 >83.3 <17 >31mph >22mph <2.75 <2.75 <6 C < 24 > 75.0 < 24 > 23 mph > 17 mph 3.50 < 3.50 4 D <31 >66.7 <31 18mph >13mph <4.25 <4.25 <3 E <39 >58.3 <35 > 15mph >10mph <5.00 <5.00 <2 � ft = Peroent free flow speed ate _ Average travel speed Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 35 lmmokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict— GMPA &PUDZApplication — Traffic Impact Statement —July 2023 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 36 M7 (D C' n O C� O Ln C r+ rQ (./0) O_ O e Conversion Rates for Traffic Impact assessments to W � Thy. � data i � � compil ati on of "l��l �� of Thu�r�b" an � calculations using th � ITE �'�� � aeration ( nuat. 'hiese conversi on rates should only be considered when local data} JUD U I I i strict aui 'dance or more eci c In of edge i not available. Ilr)mokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict— GMPA &PUDZApplication — Traffic Impact Statement —July 2023 D 1RPM Facilities in Vicinity Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 38 Imn'lokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict— GMPA &PUDZApplication — Traffic Impact Statement —July 2U3 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 39 -q- — - a I I I I I I I 10= ARISSIRIMAMAUUHL Prepared for: Hole Montes 950 Encore Way Naples, FL 34110 Phone: 239-254-2000 Collier County, Florida 4/25/2023 Prepared by: Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 2800 Davis Boulevard, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239-566-9551 Email: ntrebilcock@trebilcock.biz Immokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict —Fair-Share Mitigation for Concurrency Impacts —April 2023 The proposed Immokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict is in eastern Collier County. It is located on the south side of Immokalee Rd., west of its intersection with Randall Blvd. The development application seeks to allow up to 125,000 square feet (SF) of commercial space. The Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) analyzed 100,000 SF of mixed retail for concurrency and trip cap purposes. That intensity and use is projected to generate 389 PM Peak Hour two-way trips. The TIS demonstrated that another scenario involving 45,000 SF of mixed retail and 80,000 SF of self -storage would generate far fewer trips (187). That latter scenario did not create a significant impact on the road segment discussed in this report. The developer is responsible to pay appropriate fees required by the County's Road Impact Fee Ordinance, as building permits are issued for the proposed project. Roadway impact fees for the subject project are estimated at $1.38 million (Table 2) for 100,000 SF mixed retail at buildout (projected in 2028). The rates are based on the Collier County Residential Impact Fee Schedule dated April 1, 2023. For more details refer to Appendix A. Proposed internal roads, driveways, internal alleys, internal sidewalks/pathways, and interconnections to adjacent developments are site related improvements and are not subject to impact fee credits. In addition, the developer is required to provide appropriate turn lanes at project entrances as required at the time of site development approval. These improvements are considered site related. If turn lane improvements require the use of County's Right -of -Way (ROW) or easements, compensating ROW along the development frontage may need to be provided without cost to Collier County because of such improvement. Concurrency is a growth management concept intended to ensure that the necessary public facilities and services are available concurrent with the impacts of development. To maintain concurrency, forecasted future trafficvolumes may not exceed adopted level of service on the roadway network (area of significant influence of the project). A roadway segment is considered adversely impacted by the project if its future background traffic volume meets the adopted level of service (LOS) standard and the segment becomes deficient with the addition of project traffic. The methodology used to calculate the applicant's proportionate fair share obligation towards concurrency requirements is described in a later section. In general, it estimates the project's consumption of any capacity that must be added due to a level of service failure created by the addition of project traffic. On road segments that are already six lanes, any further improvements will be in the form of intersection improvements. Current methodology is to provide an estimate of the proportionate fair share assuming traditional widening of the road (regardless of configuration) and then revise that by replacing widening costs by intersection improvement costs on six lane segments. The TIS identified the road segments on which the addition of project traffic is projected to cause a future level of service deficiency (distinct from segments that are projected to experience failing level of service before the project traffic is added). The methodology used to calculate the applicant's proportionate fair share obligation towards concurrency requirements is outlined in Florida Statutes (F.S.) Section 163.3180 (Concurrency) and FDOT Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 2 Immokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict— Fair -Share Mitigation for Concurrency Impacts —April 2023 (Florida Department of Transportation) — CUTR (Center for Urban Transportation Research) Model Ordinance for Proportionate Fair Share Mitigation of Development Impacts on Transportation Corridors. The proposed methodology is also consistent with the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC), Section 6.02.03. As illustrated in F.S. Section 163.3180 — (5)(h)2a, "the proportionate -share contribution shall be calculated based upon the number of trips from the proposed development expected to reach roadways during the peak hour from the stage or phase being approved, divided by the change in the peak hour maximum service volume of roadways resulting from construction of an improvement necessary to maintain or achieve the adopted level of service, multiplied by the construction cost, at the time of development payment, of the improvement necessary to maintain or achieve the adopted level of service". Proportionate Fair -Share = � [(Development Trips/Service Volume Increase) x Cost] Development Trips =those trips from the stage or phase of development under review that are assigned to a roadway segment and have triggered a deficiency. This does not include the development trips on the segment that consumed available capacity. Service Volume Increase =service volume increase provided by the eligible improvement to roadway segment. Cost =adjusted cost of the improvement to roadway segment. Cost shall include all improvements and associated costs, such as design, right-of-way acquisition, planning, engineering, inspection, and physical development costs directly associated with construction at the anticipated cost in the year it will be incurred. The roadway level of service analysis of the Immokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict described in TIS assumed the presence of all capacity improvements scheduled to the end Collier County 5-Year Work Program. In Table 1, the first capacity listed is that future capacity and is described as "Unimproved" only to distinguish it from the proposed capacity improvement. Roadway service volumes in any future improved condition use the Collier County AUIR service volume multiplied by the ratio of LOS D service volumes shown in FDOT Generalized Service Volume Table 7 (Urban Condition, Class I Arterial, Appendix B) between the improved and unimproved cross sections (product rounded to the nearest hundred). That ratio reflects the effect of the additional lanes while keeping all other factors affecting service volume constant. Those other factors are reflected in the County's published service volume in the unimproved condition. The projected cost per lane mile is $4.27 million: $3.5 million construction cost from the Collier County Road Impact Fee Update Study dated October 2019, 11% of construction cost for design, and 11% of construction cost for CEL Table 1 contains the proportionate fair share contribution estimated for the one roadway segment on which the addition of project traffic triggers a level of service deficiency in the year 2028: Randall Blvd. from 8t" St NE to Everglades Blvd. The calculations that the table contains are performed with more decimal places than those displayed. Using only the displayed decimals will yield slightly different results. The contribution requirement for concurrency transportation related impacts total $0.332M. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 3 (D C' n O n 7C" n O Ln r+ 0�4 Cn O_ C rw+ O �cn lug Cj lmmokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict —Fair-Share Mitigation for con currency Impacts — April 2023 Table 2 contains the transportation impact fee estimate for 100,000 SF mixed retail. The impact fee schedule is in Appendix A. Table 2 —Impact Fee Estimate Fee per Unit Fees Ill TOTAL 0/ SOURCE: CC COMM IMPACT FEES --EFFECTIVE April 1, 2023; CC RESIDENTIAL IMPACT FEES --EFFECTIVE April 1, 2023. To mitigate the $0.332M impact, the proposed mitigation is impact fees of $1.377M. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 5 Immokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict —Fair-Share Mitigation for con currency Impacts —April 2023 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page ( 6 COLLIER COUNTY COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEES EFFECTIVE APRIL 15 2023 Greater Naples Fire Changes LAND USE Auto Sales (Luxury) LQ EMS 0008084 GOVERNAIENT BUILDINGS 0953622 JAIL 0.29407 LA'W ENFOR+CEA1JCI:NT 0.32161 ROAD 12.38000 TOTAL (RC)U,I�iDED) "WATER, WASTEWATER AND FIRE NOT INCLUDED (See Page 3) 13.60 Per Square Foot Auto Sales (New/Used) 0011538 0.76528 0.40542 0.45899 16.62200 18.37 Per Square Foot Bank/Savings Drive -In** 0017896 1018697 0.6Z882 0071191 21025400 23,96 Per Square Foot Bank/Savings. WalkJn** 0017503 1.16094 0.61504 0.69630 12.30000 14.95 Per Square Foot Business Park 0007535 0049978 0026477 0.Z9975 11.30100 12.44 Per Square Foot Car Wash - Automated 0.13814 0.91626 0.48540 0.54954 38.30300 40.39 Per Square Foot Car Wash - Self•Service 68.29 452.92 239.94 271.65 11,848.00 12,880.80 Per Bay Church 2.35 15.62 8.27 9.37 286.00 321.61 Per Seat College - 7,500 students or less 7.85 52.06 27.58 31.22 11973.00 2,091.71 Per Student College - > 7,500 student 5.49 36.44 19.31 21.86 1,483.00 L566.10 Per Student Convenience Store (24 hours) 0.42934 2084768 1050862 1070795 82.17000 88.66 Per Square Foot Convenience Store w/Gas: 4 or less Fuel Positions 341.43 21,264061 110199072 110358.24 based on sq ft range *5,164.00 Per Fuel Position 5-6 Fuel Positions 290.41 1,926.2Z 110020.46 1,155.Z9 based on sq ft range *4,392.38 Per Fuel Position 7-8 Fuel Positions 258.23 L712.77 907.37 1,027.27 based on sq ft range *3,905.64 Per Fuel Position 9=10 Fuel Positions 230.76 1,530.56 810.85 917.99 based on sq ft range *3,490.16 Per Fuel Position 11.12 Fuel Positions 215.85 1,431.65 758.45 858.66 based on sq ft range *3,264.61 Per Fuel Position 13 or more Fuel Positions Z03.29 1,348.35 714.32 808.70 based on sq ft range *3,074.66 Per Fuel Position 2,000 sq. $o based on # of fuel pos based on # of fuel pos based on # of fuel pos based on # of fuel pos 6,910.00 *6,910.00 Per Fuel Position 2,000 •2,999 sq. ft based on # of fuel pos based on # of fuel pos based on # of fuel pos based on # of fuel pos 8,252.00 *8,252.00 Per Fuel Position 3,000+ sq ftbased on # of fuel pos based on # of fuel pos based on # of fuel pos based on # of fuel pos 9,262.00 *9,262.00 Per Fuel Position Dance Studio/Clymnastics 0.174Z5 1015573 0061228 0069317 9.32500 11.96 Per Square Foot Day Care 3.9Z 26.03 13.79 15.61 1,097.00 1,156.35 Per Student Furniture Store 0.01884 0.12494 0.06620 0.07494 3067400 3.96 Per Square Foot Golf Course 84.77 562.25 297.86 337.22 11,063.67 12,345.77 Per Hole Golf Course - Bundled 25.42 168.62 89.33 101.13 3,318.94 3,703.44 Per Hole Home Improvement Store 0.14207 0094229 0.49919 0656515 8.51400 10.66 Per Square Foot Hospital 0010753 0671322 0.37784 0.42777 9016800 10.79 Per Square Foot Hotel 63.58 421.69 220.63 Z52.91 3,702.00 4,660.81 Per Room Hotel - All Suites 63.58 421.69 220.63 252.91 21974400 3,932.81 Per Room Industrial - General Light 0.05416 0.35921 0.19030 0.21545 4.58400 5.40 Per Square Foot Manufacturing 0003925 0.26030 0.13790 0015612 3062900 4.22 Per Square Foot Marina 14.91 98.91 52.41 59.33 2,376.00 2,601.56 Per Dry/Wet Berth Mine/ Commercial Excavation - - - - 14.00 14.00 Per 1,000 Cubic Yards Mini -Warehouse 0.00471 0.03124 0.01655 0601873 0689100 0.96 Per Square Foot Motel 59.65 395.66 209.60 237.30 2,074000 2,976.21 Per Room Movie Theater** 46937 3,113.19 1,649.27 1,867.Z0 4030887.00 47,986.03 1Per Screen COLLIER COUNTY COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEES EFFECTIVE APRIL 15 2023 Greater Naples Fire Changes reel" ME LAND USE Nursing Home EAS 82.41 GOVERN. .,NT BUILDINGS 546.63 JAIL 248.22 LAW ENFORCEA ENT 3Z7.85 ROAD 1,276.00 TOTAL (R{i�ll'NDE�) WATER, 'WASTEWAT.ER AND FTIZE NOT INCLUDED (See .Page 3) 2,481.11 Per Bed Office 6,000 sq. ft or less 0.07849 0652060 0027580 0031224 8.60500 9.79 Per Square Foot Office 6,001400,000 sq. ft. 0009340 0.61951 0032820 0.37157 8060500 10.02 Per Square Foot Office 100,001-200,000 sq. ft. 0.07927 0.52581 0.27856 0.31536 8.60500 9.80 Per Square Foot Office 200,001400,000 sq. ft. 0.06672 0.44251 0.23443 0.26540 8.60500 9.61 Per Square Foot MEN Office Greater than 400,000 sq. ft. 0.06044 0640086 0.21236 0.24042 8060500 9.52 Per Square Foot Office - Medical 10,000 sf, or less 0.08948 0.59348 0.31441 0.35595 Z1.95500 23.31 Per Square Foot Office - Medical >10,000 sq. ft. 0.13029 0.86420 0.45783 0.51832 31.44400 33.41 Per Square Foot Pharmacy/Drug Store 0.15384 1.02038 0.54056 0.61199 12.61800 14.94 Per Square Foot Quick Lube 91.05 603.90 319.93 362.20 12,198.00 13,575.08 Per Bay Restaurant -Fast Food w/Drive- 'I hru 0.69856 4.63334 2.45460 2.77894 104.27200 114.84 Per Square Foot Restaurant - High Turnover** 21.19 140.56 74.46 84.30 1,814.00 2,134.51 Per Seat Restaurant - Low Trn uover** 17.27 114.53 60.68 68.69 1,163.00 1,424.17 Per Seat Restaurant - Fast Casual** 0069856 4063334 2045460 2677894 68610700 78.67 Per Square Foot - Restaurant Fast Food wlDrive- Thru (2 meals) 0069856 4063334 2.45460 2077894 95076200 106.33 Per Square Foot Retail 6,000 Sq. Ft. or Less 0019230 1027547 0.67571 0076499 5.73700 8.65 Per Square Foot MEN Retail 6,001-25,000 Sq. Ft. 0.19230 1.27547 0.67571 0.76499 10.56800 13.48 Per Square Foot Retail 25,001- Ft 50,000 Sq. . 0.19Z30 1027547 0067571 0.76499 13677400 16.68 Per Square Foot Ft Retail 50,001400,000 Sq. . 0.19Z30 1027547 0067846 0076499 13.77400 16.69 Per Square Foot Retail 100,001450,000 Sq. Ft. 0019230 1.27547 0.62055 0076499 13077400 16.63 Per Square Foot Retail 150,Ft 001-200,000 Sq. . 0.18759 1.24423 0.75845 0.74625 13.77400 16.71 Per Square Foot Retail 200,001-400,000 Sq. Ft. 0.18367 1.21820 0064536 0.73064 13.77400 16.55 Per Square Foot PER Retail 400,001-600,000 Sq. Ft. 0618210 L20779 0967295 0.72440 13.77400 16,56 Per Square Foot Retail 600,001-1,000,000 Sq. Ft. 0.17032 1.12970 0.66743 0067756 13077400 16.42 Per Square Foot Retail >1,000,000 Sq. Re 0.16404 L08805 0.57642 0.65258 13.77400 16.26 Per Square Foot School asElementary (Private) 4.71 31.24 16.55 18.73 815.00 886.23 Per Student School asMiddle (Private) 5.49 36.44 19.31 21.86 921.00 1,004.10 Per Student School asHigh School (Private) NOW MMOM 6.28 41.65 22.07 24.98 983.00 1,077.98 Per Student Supermarket** 0016090 1.06723 0056539 0064009 Z2.56900 25.00 Per Square Foot Tire Store 105.18 697.60 369.57 418.40 9,318.00 10,908.75 Per Bay Warehouse 0002198 0.14577 0.07722 0.08743 1059900 1.93 Per Square Foot * Fees for Convenience Store w/Gas are determined by different criteria. Remember to include ALL fees when calculating **If in a shopping center, or if on an outparcei of a shopping center, use Retail land use. CIT Y OFNAPLES AND CITY OF MARCO ISLAND: Collier County Law Enforcement, Fire, Water and Sewer are not assessed. Check with the City for their impact fees. CITY OF EVERGLADES: Collier County Road, Water and Sewer are not assessed. Immokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict — Fair -Share Mitigation for Con currency Impacts —April 2023 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 9 Immokolee Randall Commercial Subdistrict — Fair -Share Mitigation for Concurrency Impacts — April 2023 T� D L E I G r er4liZe� reidK MOW Li lluncAl Volumes for Flerida'ad s Urt�ari]�Ed A►r�3 January 2020 MIN 111 all STATE SIGNALIZED ARTERLALS I K I E�iTAX Cola s s I (40 avh £�f higher poste speed limit) Core Urbanized Laces byledian B C D E, Lanes B C D E 1 Undivided � 830 880 �* 2 2,230 3,100 3,740 421080 2 Divided * 1v910 2,000 3 1280 4570 5,620 6,130 3 Divided * 2,,940 3,020 ** 4 4.310 61,030 7,490 52170 4 Divided * 3,970 47040 * 5 5,390 7430 9,3 70 10:1 ? Class II (35 mph or slower posted speed limit) 6 6,380 801990 1110510 12,760 Lanes Median B C D E Urbani ed 1 Undhrrided * 370 750 Soo Lanes B C D E 1, ? Dig►idled * 730 1,630 C+0 ? 2,2' 0 1100 3,890 �4,23Q 3 Divided * 113170 22520 24 60 3 3,410 4,650 5,�780 6,340 4 Divided * 12610 32390 3410 4 4,550 6,200 711654 82460 5 5,690 7,760 9,520 10,570 Non -State Signalized Roadmmy Adjustments Freeway Adjustments (Aher corresperudiag :star luvlumes Ain€ ha r r RIEW b)'the imdicati*l peat) Lane 2.ielbenng NonStat+e Signalized Roadw �s -10% + LOOO + 5 0?* �I�ied>ian & Turn Lane Adjustments til�iINTERRITPTED FLG�' HIGHWAY Exoruve Exclusive Adju Lanes Idedian Leif Lanes Right Lanes Facto Lanes 1lriedian B C D E 1 Diidde Yes No +50la 1 Undi%Tided 580 890 12200 17610 1 Undivided No No M76 2 Di%rided 1:1800 1600 3,280 3,730+ hihiltl Undixided fires No -5!e 3 Divided 2t700 3,900 429410 52600 Multi Undi7Ade. No No -25% Yes +5% Uninterrupted Floes* Highway Adjustments Laney t�'iei� F��c%te left lanes ,�.�ljust�nt Ian One -Ws ay Faeilit - Adjustment 1 Dixided Yes +5% Multiply the co2i -T& cn = tioual Mbld, Undiirided Yes Y vohones in this table by 12 Multi Undkided No -2'Y/e BICYCIE 110DEi Tahiesi Shawn are Wre. d as peak hour d P�=r al xvkmes for la"Js of sen ice mi (MnildpRy .eM;t3e volt nes sioun below by nmmber .of 's' fra• theautamobilellm:l modem = e.:: 4eddcEy stzleL Ibs able does not �3irEctnda2Il Loa f Isa�es ti�et� '+ec,� two-�� ,�,= ; ,am Serv'iCe comamEe a st�ndamd and shold be u e arr2- for reel pl,errinff ,3rc�lic?t1nn._ The ccmpunz mDieLs from vi-hh this table �daftwed sbDU3d be u.:;P.d far more ;q ci= nBnme:.;� i3hm rin aw1�:aboa:. The tabla an. r<vme co=qva =Ael:should ut be u:se for Paved cor its of interetdm :1aarL Mere more refted cpachmqws e=. Cikulaboas based oaplam nr; i 2dais of tLe Hna m d &.*, Trarr_l r_ awcity and Quahty of ShouldertSicrcle. senTice A rr,,1 Lane Ccnrera ae B C D E l ex4.1 of senwe !kr the bir r1e a=' T.�3e= tr= MWA'P�i is Lis able i3 base. or. 0-49% * 150 390 12000 mmber o Tehd ei. wt xmiter of bi.mdLi r ar Tees�ns uZM*4 the fa 5044% 11+0 340 12,000 `'1,0+00 sr pishaur are `rr pe�lS is sire di YricaoY the a=5 85400P,0 470 1,0+00 512000 fkw. PEDESTRIAN MODE & * C'amat be adnevei uskg cage mp= rdlu2 drffh2ts. (.% u1Jply irebide n h=es sho%m bel�* boy- mmber of •; Not appbbble fits char level of sentice IrwtteT �_ FCC � rn atawwbiia a� diirecticnz.1 ro3dwsT lane to de�rmme tnto-vmyw maidmum sen nke tivb=eZW ezearzx than LVvel of senzr_e D became F becmr inter a capa,mes EL�� vohnner.) been reacbai For tia bic de =od , the lh*►leI of:�e latter gadair�t�d� g Fj is eat ��-able becaie there i; nro mwdm �- *:*.hic a vehEme ±n=wholc u ann� table irim Sidewalk Ccnrerage B C D E tralua de: vidus 049% * 140 480 Source: 5{l- fro �1 1 0 9 Floni:la l�a==mr of Tsam4+oataciou: g5-1�D0'�� 20`0 5�-t� �$0=�I,OCIO S):tams lmglerrerat�. lice , hrtpi: �Us w idotgov. ° pluming, I 'sss' MIM BUS MODE (Scheduled Fixed Route)3 (Buses iu peak howii peak directiaa) Sidewalk Coverage B C D E 04$40io0 > 5 > 4 ' 3 > 2 8540fto > 4 > 3 2 > 1 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 10 WIA Prepared for Mr. Michael Saadeh GM Advisors LLC 434 Terracina Court Naples, FL 34119 Vlanning— Es�ecution —Results . Real Estate Econometrics, Inc. eal Estate Econometrics, Inc. Suite 100 707 Orchid Drive Naples, Florida 34102 (239) 269-1341 Ree-i.Com Executive Summary GM Advisors, LLC ("Applicant") is seeking approval for a proposed 125,000 square -foot neighborhood retail center ("Project") which could include an 80,000 square foot self -storage facility on the south side of Immokalee Road just east of Wilson Boulevard and west of Randall Road in Collier County's Rural Estates planning area and Residential Estates Subdistrict. The Project will satisfy the increase in retail demand over the next five (5) years in the retail market area as determined in this report. The County's future growth is congregated along the Immokalee Road corridor out toward the Rural Lands Stewardship Area ("RLSA"). The Property is strategically located in between the current growth heading east on Immokalee Road and the RLSA. The Property w and the market • Retail market expenditures potential is forecasted to be $411,785,656 in the next five (5) years. In addition, specific types of retail uses identified for the Subject Site and their related expenditures will grow over $23- million over the same time period. • The Project is strategically located to take advantage of the future retail demand and the traffic flowing along Immokalee Road. The Project will help address the demand coming to the Market Area over the next five (5) years. The Subject Site will also make signi Collier County in fierms of new salaries property taxes. ficant economic contributions fio and wages plus sales taxes and The Project will also provide self -storage square feet that will satisfy the projected demand for self -storage space that will accompany the population growth within the five (5)-mile market area and the demand that will be coming from the fringe areas around the three-mile market area. • The demand for self -storage in the five (5)-mile market area is currently 281,236 with no existing supply. There is a proposed 64,314 self -storage facility in the proposed Randall Road mixed use development, which is estimated to be built in 2024. The Pro ject's proposed 80,000 square foot self -storage facility is estimated to be built in 2025 and the Randall at Orangetree's 89.325 self -storage facility is estimated to come on-line in 2026. • If all three self -storage facilities are construcfied, the self -storage market area will still have a demand deficit of 59,661 in 2025 growing to a supply deficit of 89,864 square feet in the 2033 horizon year. The Applicant is seeking to develop three parcels of land that total 10.5-acres+/- located on the south side of Immokalee Road just east of Wilson Boulevard and west of Randall Road in Collier County's Rural Estates planning area and Residential Estates Subdistrict. The applicant is proposing aSmall-Scale Amendment to the Growth Management Plan (GMP) to change the future land use designation to a new commercial subdistrict and a rezoning to a Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD). Based upon the Concept Plan, the site is proposed to be developed as an approximately 125,000 square foot neighborhood center with the potential for an 80,000 square foot self -storage facility. The GMP application requires a commercial market analysis the 125,000 square feet of future retail development which co to 80,000 square foot self -storage facility. includes that both uld include 50,000 Real Estates Econometrics,"Consultant") has been retained to analyze the proposed neighborhood retail center and a potential self -storage facility for the Applicant. The Consultant is well -versed in prepa especially in the Southwest Florida marketplace. ring needs analysis studies The Retail Market Study starting on page 2 and the Self -Storage Market starting on page 16 are comprised of five (5) parts, the market demographics, the market analysis and conclusion. Study area Project Site The Projecfi is located on the south side of Immokalee Road just east of Wilson Boulevard and west of Randall Road in northern Collier County. The Project is well positioned for commercial activity with just under 1,000-feet of frontage along Immokalee Road and provides an ease of ingress/egress opportunities. With an average depth of 5004eet, the Project site has plenty of space to develop a neighborhood center. Figure 1 below shows the Pro ject's highlighted parcels. Figure 1. Project Highlighted Location s Source: Collier County Property Appraiser Immokalee Road and Randall Boulevard Planning Study Collier County initiated this Immokalee Road and Randall Boulevard Planning Study recommended through the 2019 adopted amendments to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan to evaluate the existing conditions, future conditions, a area. recommendations for the study The purpose of this Study is to identify the land use tools and infrastructure necessary to support future development within the Immokalee Road/Randall Boulevard study area. This Study developme is also intended to provide generalized, guiding nt of the area pending acceptance and approval by principles in the County. the There are two parts to the study — a public survey report that has been updated through March 27, 2023 (Appendix A on page 28) and a Planning Study for the area prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates in February 2021 (Appendix B on page 63). To date, the public survey has had over 55 respondents as shown in Chart 1 below. Chart 1. Category of Respondents to Survey. Q3 -Are you a resident, business owner, or just driving through the area? 55 E:] 15 4G 35 =U t �+ J Re�s�d�rt .lust OrN1ng Thtou� Source: Collier County Immokalee Rd./Randall Blvd. Study Area Survey Many of the survey questions were open ended, which elicited one -word responses or an array of comments. There were three questions that allowed for the responses to be charted and are relevant to the Project. Chart 2 on the next page notes that the survey respondents were looking for more shopping and restaurants as the number one activity for the planning area Chart 2. Category of Respondents to Survey. Q7 -What types of activities would you like to see more of? (pick up to 4) 45 4(I 35 34 25 20 15 iF. 0 Mare shopping and Restaurants Enhartoed or More t_artdscaping Source: Collier County Immokalee Rd./Randall Blvd. Study Area Survey Chart 3 below po to provide basic needs without over building. is commercial that addresses basic needs along with shopping opportunities as noted in the previous. ints out that the respondents' biggest opportunity for this area The Project will provide restaurants and additional Chart 3. Study Area Biggest Opportunities. Q8 -What are the biggest opportunities for this area? (pick up io 3) 35 30 25 �U I5 1� 0 G.n provde tsacic nc<ds mMhovt nvn tsu,'drr+g �t th. .'ldl c>3nnAcr�ed ha mdtiptr locations, rase of Staved JC Cf :: ' StYI hive trrrte to plan � de+�[opment Source: Collier County Immokalee Rd./Randall Blvd. Study Area Survey Finally, Chart 4 below challenge to the area is shows that according to local residents, the largest the lack of places to eat and shop. Chart 4. Study Area Biggest Challenges. Q9 -What are the biggest challenges in this area? (pick up to 3) 3�+ 2� zn I5 IC !J n tack of ptacr_s to eat and shop lack of skla was tack of pubik •,paceslparS�:, Stom�r�ttrltir+- Other ding tack of housing Source: Collier County Immokalee Rd./Randall Blvd. Study Area Survey Collier County commissioned Kimley-Horn and Associates to prepare a planning study for the Immokalee Rd./Randall Blvd. area. Kimley-Horn engaged the community with the previous survey and held two Zoom information meetings with the local residents shown in Figure 2 below. Figure 2. Immokalee Rd./Randall Bled. Planning Study rokalee Rd. andall Blvd. nning Study February 2021 ley -Horn and Associates Source: Kimley-Horn and Associates Immokalee Rd./Randall Blvd. Planning Study The main takeaway from the study was a focus on developing mixed use projects and to develop more commercial, retail and restaurant space to alleviate the extended drives currently required to other parts of the County for jobs, shopping and restaurant options. Figure 3 below shows the engagement. highlights of the community Figure 3. Immokalee Rd. Randall Blvd. Planning Study Community Engagement Community Engagement cc Keeping the natural h*aufy by not overdeveloping. >> • There is a common vision for a sustainable �� C�perttmitiestatxrldmaricet rate houwV and housing that is balance between (re)development and the environment without overbuilding the study it Ilave acoupleoftataurant area aptions. Sarre additional tram needs without over-buikJa d the • Extended drives currently required (to other 'L:1a. " parts of the County such as North Naples for « A?edrnorefestauranisand Wrote shopping. Need nxye things jobs, shopping, and restaurant options) for fanWiyacWities.:s • Main takeaways: (; Please pfeserve the area, build safer walking and bikitV and slow • Protection of existing environmental resources traffic 1) • More public open spaces 60 Iwould like p.'easantamcanives. • Increased commercial/restaurant/retail options but rotovordoro. Hospon.srblo bur7ding with opon public paces in • Improved roadways that provide for a reduction thomodomMomo. 5' in traffic and increased mobility options Source: Kimley-Horn and Associates Immokalee Rd./Randall Blvd. Planning Study One important aspect was addressed in the study. Kimley-Horn utilized the demand calculations prepared by the Consultant in a previous study in the area. The demand calculation showed that t a nd vacant) of 1,751,404 square feet here was a total supply, both developed with an existing demand of 1,213,473 square feet In the year 2020. The supply stays steady as it includes the vacant acreage that could potentially be developed as commercial. Figure 4 on the next page shows the table indicating the supply/demand calculation that includes the study area. The Collier Interactive Growth Model ("CIGM") calculated 1,691,867 potential square feet for the market area as noted in the County Staff report on the Commercial Needs Analysis Report noted in the figure. Figure 4. Supply/Demand Calculation including the Study Area. Determined the oversupply or undersupply of commercial space in the 1%inute drive time area both with the current existing and potential commercial square footage. • County uses a 1.15 allocation ratio as a measuring stick. DEO recommends 1.25 allocation ratio. The 2030 allocation ratio is below the County and recommended allocation ratio. Table 9. Drive Time Demand -Supply Calculation Retail Demand (sq. ft.) 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 Demand Per G1�1D Commercial Inventory 8 Population Retail Supply Developed Vacant Total Supply i ,213.473 1.335.420 1,579,788 1,875.21 G 2,209,305 2,58G,484 725,404 725,404 72`.404 725,404 725,404 725,404 1,02G,000 1,02G,000 1,02G,000 1,02G,000 1,02G,000 I ,02G,000 ------- ---------------------------------- ------------------------------------------ 1,751.404 1,751 t404 1,751,404 11751,404 1175 1.404 1,751,404 Allocation Ratio 1.44 1.31 1.11 0.93 0.79 0.68 Source: Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section, Cal!ier County Property Appraiser, ESRI ARCgis mapping system and the Consultant * "Commercial Need Analysis and Residential Market Study for Subject Property at the Northeast Corner of 4 August 26, 2020 prepared by Real Estate Econometrics, Inc. �t' Street N.E. and Immokalee Road Collier County, Florida" Source: Kimley-Horn and Associates Immokalee Rd./Randall Blvd. Planning Study Figure 4 above shows that the addition of the Project to the Collier County commercial inventory will not adversely affect the balance of commercial supply in the market and surrounding area. The Allocation Ratio is 1.11 in the Collier County Comprehensive Plan 2030 horizon year as the ProIect's acreage is already included in the vacant acreage total which is below the recommended 1.25 allocation ratio as suggested by the former Florida DCA now Florida DEO. The 1.12 allocation ratio in 2030 is 0.03 below the constricting 1.15 ratio the County has used as a measuring stick. 3.0 Retail Market Area Demographics 3.1 Market Area Definition Since the retail market is being analyzed, it is appropriate to define the market area for such use by using the definition of shopping centers utilized by International Council of Shopping Centers ("ICSC") and CoStar Realty ("CSR") (See Appendix C, page 86). i falls within the ne ghborhood The 125,000 square feet of proposed retail space retail center, the second smallest classification of retail centers according to ICSC and CSR ICSC and CSR defines strip/convenience centers as "convenience oriented". ICSC and CSR note that the national average size of a neighborhood center is 30,000 to 125,000 square feet on five (5) to 10 acres and generally has one (1) anchor. They have determined the trade area for a neighborhood center to be five (5) miles. Based on the ICSC and CSR definition, the Consultant used a five (5)-mile radius market area. The Consultant utilized the Environmental Systems Research Institute ("ESRI") mapping system to define the five (5)-mile radius. The ESRI Business Analyst mapping program is geographic information system -based ("GIS") that calculates the radius from the Project which for the extractio census data from that radius market area. Figure 5 below shows the five mile radius from the Project. Figure 5. Five (5��Mile Radius Source: ESRI ArcGIS Business Analyst Mapping System 4.0 MARKET ANALYSIS 4.1 Market Area Demographic Make Up n of (5)- The Subject Property's five (5)-mile market radius has a current population of 39,425 according to the U.S. Census Bureau and as shown in Table 1 on the page following the next page. That population is estimated to be 42,956 in 2028. The Consultant did not account for the increased population that just outside the market area due to the development of the Skysail and Rivergrass villages to the east and the rapid residential development growth coming down Immokalee Road to the west. The c impa urrem and future retail expenditures provided by ESRI do not include the ct those land use changes when forecasting future retail expenditures. ESRI's forecasts are based o n current conditions so the new development will begin to show up in the annual census community surveys are taken as those villages begin to have residents. The average household size is forecasted to diminish from the current 2.93 to 2.91 in 2028. The household size will be reduced as retirees continue to settle in the planned amenitized communities being developed in the surrounding Market Area. Household incomes over $100,000 within the retail market area will increase from the current 44.9% to 53.0% in 2028. This increase will require more retail opportunities nearby to support this income growth and reduce travel on local roads to distant existing retail opportunities. The population by age demographics indicate that a subtle shift to an older population will occur by 2028. Again, this is based on the current population base and does not factor in the two new villages in the Rural Lands Stewardship Area. The Consultant estimates that the over 55 population categories will increase significantly over the next five (5) years as the villages come to fruition and the retirees begin to filter into those communities. (Rest of Page Left Intentionally Blank) Table In S=Mile Market Area Demographic and Income Profile �� GM Advisors 5-Mile Radius Demographics Prepared by Esri 13062 Immokalee Rd, Naples, Florida, 34120 Latitude: 26.26U59, Ring: 5 mile radius Longitude:-81.59695 Summary Population Households Families Average Household Size Owner Occupied Housing Units Renter Occupied Housing Units Median Age Trends: 2023-2028 Annual Rate Population Households Families Owner HHs Median Household Income Households by Income <$15, 000 $15,000 - $24,999 $25,000 - $34,999 $35,000 - $49,999 $50,000 - $74,999 $75,000 - $99,999 $100,000 - $149,999 $150,000 - $199,999 $200,000+ Median Household Income Average Household Income Per Capita Income Population by Age 0-4 5-9 10 - 14 15 - 19 20 - 24 25 - 34 35 - 44 45 - 54 55 - 64 65 - 74 75 - 84 85+ Census 2010 Census 2020 2023 2028 24,619 34,479 391425 421956 71794 11,585 131448 141780 61449 - 101872 11,913 3.16 2.98 2.93 2.91 61600 - 121067 131042 11194 - 11381 11738 37.0 - 39.8 40.3 Area State National 1.73% 0.63% 0.30% 1.910/0 0.77% 0.49% 1.850/b 0.74% 0.44% 1.57% 0.93% 0.66% 3.53% 3.34% 2.57% 2023 2028 Number Percent Number Percent 624 4.6% 540 3.7% 522 3.9% 404 2.7% 570 4.2% 457 3.1% 11280 9. 5% 953 6.4% 21805 20.9% 21803 19.0% 11613 12.0% 1,787 12.1% 21825 21.0% 31390 22.9% 11315 9.8% 11880 12.7% 11893 14.1% 21567 17.4% $87,672 $104,287 $124, 314 $145, 615 $42, 43 2 $ 50,149 Census 2010 2023 2028 Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent 1,556 6.3% 21210 5.6% 21434 5.7% 1,837 7.5% 21517 6.4% 2,648 6.2% 2,215 9.00/0 21800 7.10/b 31042 7.1% 2,027 8.2% 2,488 6.3% 21581 6.00/b 1,230 5.0% 2,080 5.3% 11905 4.4% 2,681 10.9% 51127 13.0% 51446 12.7% 4,100 16. 7% 51290 13.4% 61158 14. 3% 4,098 16.6% 51268 13.4% 51329 12.4% 2,651 10.80/0 51269 13.4% 51475 12.7% 1,551 6.3% 41087 10.4% 41801 11.2% 558 2.3% 1,926 4.9% 2,579 6.0% 114 0.5% 364 0.9% 560 1.3% Source: ESRI and U.S. Census Bureau 4.2 Market Area Commercial Needs Analysis Basis is the existing commercial square feet and acreage within five (5)-mile radius of the Property. The floor area ratio ("FAR") within the market area is 7,436 square feet per acre. There are 27 vacant commercially zoned parcels totaling 71.53 acres in the market area. That would equate to a potential of 531,915 future square feet of commercial space using the existing FAR. The total number of existing and immediate potential square feet in the market area i3 2,645,442 as shown in Table 2 on the next page. Table 15-Mile Market Area Developed and Undeveloped Commercial Acreage SquareParcels Acres Undeveloped Commercial 27 71.53 531,915 7,436 Totals 111 355.75 276451442 Source: ESRI and U.S. Census Bureau Additionally, there are a number of PUDs and Overlays in the market area that need to be accounted for in determining the future commercial development potential. They are listed in Table 3 below. It is important to note that the Orange Blossom Ranch PUD recently converted about half of its commercial square feet to apartments, so they now have 100,000 square feet of potential commercial development. Table 3. 5-Mile Market Area PUDs Commercial Square Feet Developed Comm -Retail 2,113,527_sq. ft. Vacant Comm FAR 71.53 acres Total Vacant Commercial Sq. Ft. 531, 916 Orange Blossom Ranch PUD 1001000 River Grass Square Feet 801000 Hyde Park Square Feet 453000 BCHID Parcel 2301000 RCHID Parcel 451000 Randall Blvd. SubDistrict 404,448 Orange Tree PUD 3323000 IRRV Overlay 2251000 Total Vacant and Approved Commercial Sq. Ft. 1,993,364 Total Supply 4,106, 891 Source: Collier County Development Services PUD list and Collier County Property Appraiser By taking the existing developed square feet in the market area and dividing that number by the current population, the square feet of commercial development per capital can be determined as shown in Table 4 on the next page. The economic theory behind this concept is that markets continually strive for economic equilibrium where supply meets demand through price fluctuation. Equilibrium is the state in which market supply and demand balance each other, and as a result prices become stable. Market equilibrium is a natural point of convergence between supply, demand and price. At this point in time, the market equilibrium in the market area is 53.61 square feet of commercial demand per capita. Table 4. 5-Mile Market Area Comm ercial Square Feet per Capita 5-Mile Radius Commercial Square Feet: 2,113,527 5-Mile Radius 2023 Population. 391425 Commercial Square Feet Demand Per Capita. 53061 Source: Collier County Property Appraiser and ESRI The County population is growing at a five-year rate of 5.2% (Appendix D, Page 88). The Urban and Rural Estates areas account for nearly 10% of that growth. With growth continuing down the Immokalee Road corridor and the Rural Lands Stewardship Area beginning to blossom with villages and townsit is reasonabl ,e to consider that the Urban and Rura I Estates will continue to absorb a laraer portion or the Countys population growth. A population growth fctor of 26% Table 5 below shows the demand calculation for the 5-mile market area every five years through 2038. Table 5. 5-Mile Market Area Commercial Square Feet Demand Projection �� �2023 2028 � 2033 � 2038 County Population 4161607 4461284 4707999 4971083 5-Mile Radius Population 391479 551997 711522 881957 Demand Square Feet Per Capita 53.61 53.61 53061 53061 Commercial Square Feet Demand 2,116, 422 3, 001, 909 3, 834, 211 4, 768, 902 Source: Collier County Development Services and ESR Combining the demand calculation with the supply calculation, an allocation ratio can be determined through the 10-year horizon year and beyond next page shows the allocation ratio calc 2orizon year th . Table 6 on the ulation though the year 2038. In the Table 6. 5-11viile Market Area Commercial Square Feet Supply/Demand Projection 2023 2028 2033 2038 Sq. Ft. Demand Per GMD Commercial nventory & Population 2,116, 422 3, 001, 909 318341211 417681902 Retail Supply Developed Vacant Total Supply 2,113,527 1, 9937 364 4,106, 891 2,113,527 1,993,364 4,106,891 2,113,527 1,9931364 4,106,891 2,113, 527 1, 9931364 4,106, 891 Allocation Ratio 1.94 1.37 1.07 0.86 Source: Collier County Development Services, Collier County Property Appraiser and ESRI When the Property's 125,000 square feet of commercial space is added to the supply side, the allocation ratio increases to 1.10 in the 2033 horizon year which is again below the County's 1.15 allocation 7 ratio requirement as shown in Table Table 7. 5-Mile Market Area Commercial Square Feet Supply/Demand Projection with Project 2023 2028 2033 2038 Sq. Ft. Demand Per GMD Commercial I nventory & Population 211163 422 33 0017 909 33 8341211 47 7683 902 Commercial Supply Developed Vacant Total Supply 2, 238, 527 1,993,364 4, 2317891 2, 238, 527 1,993,364 4, 231, 891 2, 238, 527 1,993,364 4, 231, 891 2, 238, 527 1, 993, 364 4,231,891 Allocation Ratio 2.00 1.41 1.10 0.89 Source: Collier County Development Services, Collier County Property Appraiser and ESRI The future demand generally looks out to the jurisdiction comprehensive plan's horizon year, which is currently either 2033 to 2043 depending on the jurisdiction's comprehensive plan and growth management plan horizon year requirements. In Collier County's case, the Comprehensive Plan's horizon year is 2033 which matches the County's 10-year planning horizon. It is at this point Wine analysis that has caused an anomaly in determining a true economic supply and demand result. On the supply side, it is relatively easy to determine the amount of existing and approved supply from the property appraiser data. The difficulty lies in the vacant non -approved potential lands. Collier County Staff requires the Applicant to take all of those lands that have a commercial overlay on them and include them as supply by putting a floor area ratio figure to the acreage. The issue becomes apparent when all of the lands thafi are not in the existing or approved category are included in the particular land use analysis. By putting all of the potential lands in the supply category, the assumption is that all of that land would be developed as that particular land use overlay and nothing else. The flaw in that representation is all of fihose vacant approved parcels and parcels designated by the FLUM as having the potential to be developed as one use, which could be a non -competing or some other commercial use. The same parcels are also counted as competing supply when a commercial needs analysis is performed for another commercial use. Essentially, they are double counted in both analyses when they will actually be developed as the market demand dictates. A general economic principal states that all markets are efficient and that supply for the most part is generated as demand dictates. It is a rare situation where supply generates demand. The allocation ratio measures the amount of additional acreage required in relation to the directly utilized acreage to assure proper market functioning in the sale, usage and allocation of land. The additional acreage is required in order to maintain market level pricing and to account for the likelihood that certain lands wIll not be placed on the market for sale during the forecast horizon or may be subject to future environmental or other constraints. Thus, the lands allocated in the FLUM should be considerably greater than those that will actually be used or developed. Again, basic economic principles have shown that markets are efficient in terms of supply and demand and the ultimate lack of available commercial choices creates an impediment to the market functioning properly. One must also consider that not all of the office/commercial designation in the future land use map will be developed as such since the owners of those properties will only develop the land with uses that respond to market demand. The increased acres will maintain flexibility within the comprehensive plan, keep prices reasonable by not constraining land supply, and compensate for lands which may be unavailable for sale or subject to environmental or other development constraints. Growth management practices have suggested that the greater the time horizon of the comprehensive plan, the greater the allocation ratio needed to maintain flexibility of the comprehensive plan. Other factors that influence the residential acreage allocation ratio are the nature and speed of the developin g area History has shown that the former Florida Department of Community Affairs ("DCA") (Currently the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity) ("DEO") recommended an allocation ratio of 1.25 in the horizon year of a comprehensive pIan yet it had seen and approved allocation ratios in the 1.8 to 2.4 range and in some cases even larger allocation ratios for longer forecast horizons. Otherwise, if allocation ratios are not used in the analysis, then an appropriate breakdown of the potential lands between the various land use types needs to be undertaken in order to more accurately analyze the need for a comprehensive land use change. The County utilizes an allocation ratio of 1.15 as their allocation ratio value at the horizon year when determining how a project will impact the market area. The Market Area's allocation ratio with the Project is 1.10 in the 2033 horizon year which falls under the County's accepted maximum 1.15 horizon year allocation ratio. 4.3 Market Area Potential Purchasing Power Analysis Notwithstanding the Consultanfi's estimated increase in the over 55 population and their significant impact on the retail market spending power, the retail market area's spending potential will increase to $4111785 1656 over the next five (5) years. The total spending potential table is shown in Appendix E, page 90. While the total market area's spending potential covers a multitude of categories, not all categories will be a fit on the Subject Property. There are certain categories with significant spending potential over the next five (5) years that would be supported by retail businesses looking to take advantage of that potential. Those are shown in Table 2 on the next page. Table On Potential Retail Types 3-Mile Radius Areas of Potential 2022 2027 Potential Apparel and Services $14,359,442 $181563,530 $4,204,088 Computers and Hardware for Home Use $1,209,452 $1,564,120 $354,668 Pets $4,625,542 $5,994,655 $1,369,113 Toys/Games/Crafts/Hobbies $852,038 $1,100,901 $248,863 Furniture $4,512,396 $5,831,946 $1,319,550 Life/Homeowner/Vehicle/Health/Other Insurance $49,450,405 $63,983,058 $14,532,653 Personal Care Products $3,452,221 $4,463,541 $1,011,320 $78,461,496 $1015011751 $23,040,255 Source: ESRI, U.S. Census Bureau and Bureau of Labor Statistics — Consumer Expenditure Surveys The insurance, apparel and services, pet support, furniture and personal care products top the list of potential retail services that would be supported if located in the retail square feet of the Subject Site. Another retail service that would likely do well if located in the Subject Site is computers and hardware for home use. The closest retail computer store is located about 3.5-miles from the Subject Site. Almost all of the computer type services in the retail market area are located in residences so a retail computer sales and service business with a broad range of products and services would do well at the Subject Site. A more detailed look at the potential retail services that could service the retail market area is shown in Table 9 on the next page. This table shows that retail opportunities such as any kind of apparel, computers and hardware for home use, pet stores, furniture stores, homeowner and insurance companies plus personal care retail stores would fare well in this location. Table 9. Consumer Spending on Retail Types Apparel and Services Computer Computers and Hardware for Home Use Portable Memory Computer Software Computer Accessories Entertainment & Recreation Televisions Satellite Dishes VCRs, Video Cameras, and DVD Players Miscellaneous Video Equipment Video Cassettes and DVDs Video Game Hardware/Accessories Video Game Software Audio Rental and Repair of TV/Radio/Sound Equipment Pets Sports/Recreation/Exercise Equipment (6) Health Nonprescription Drugs Prescription Drugs Eyeglasses and Contact Lenses Household Furnishings and Equipment Furniture Major Appliances (14) Housewares (15) Small Appliances Household Operations Lawn and Garden (16) Housekeeping Supplies (17) Insurance 2022 �� 2027 Projected Consumer Spending $15,060,863 Forecasted Demand $191395,625 Gwth Spending ro $ 11334,762 $1,254,648 $1,617,453 $362,805 $34, 339 $44, 383 $10, 044 $69,819 $90,192 $20,373 $1391101 $179,096 $39,995 $23,3831216 $30,153,740 $6,770,524 $849,914 $1, 092, 355 $242,441 $11,838 $15,198 $3,360 $35,971 $46,263 $10,292 $1071630 $138,547 $30,917 $61,145 $78,621 $17,476 $2081792 $268,493 $59,701 $1171358 $150,856 $33,498 $8311025 $1,069,980 $238,955 $14,591 $18,809 $4,218 $51140,181 $6,641,308 $1,501,127 $1,4461036 $1,863,804 $417,768 $1,085,744 $1,401,230 $315,486 $2,342,$ 353 3,022,829 $680,476 $6881430 $887,612 $199,182 $4,727,537 $6,085,447 $1,357,910 $2,957,158 $3,810,525 $853,367 $6531580 $842,591 $189/011 $388/816 $501,533 $112,717 $3,722,184 $4,807,082 $1,084,898 $5, 637, 780 $7, 267,186 $1, 629,406 Owners and Renters Insurance $4,792,822 $6,179,296 $1,386,474 Vehicle Insurance $13,939,889 $17,955,384 $4,015,495 Life/Other Insurance $4,357,604 $5,619,786 $1,262,182 Health Insurance $29,805,812 $38,446,422 $8,640,610 Personal Care Products (18) $3,6071239 $4,647,141 $1,039,902 Source: ESRI, U.S. Census Bureau and Bureau of Labor Statistics -Consumer Expenditure Surveys Existing businesses must be considered when determining the highest and best retail use for a market area. The primary opportunities are shown in Table 10 on the next page. The entire existing business data base can be found in Appendix F on page 93. The primary opportunities for the Subject Site include clothing stores, electronic & appliance stores, furniture stores, finance & insurance businesses plus health and personal care stores. Location and size of the existing businesses must be considered when looking at the retail market area. Most of these businesses are located within a three (3)-mile market area. The overall majority of these businesses are serviced out of a home as opposed to a retail outlet. Those businesses are limited in providing goods and services due to their size and location. The Subject Site would be a significantly better location for those types of businesses to provide a broad range of goods and services in a centralized location. Table 10. Primary Retail Opportunities for Subject Site PRIMARY OPPORTUNITIES Businesses Employees Number Percent Number Percent Furniture &Home Furnishings Stores 3 1.0% 9 0.5% Electronics & Appliance Stores 1 0.3% 9 0.5% Bldg Material & Garden Equipment & Supplies Dealers 7 2.2% 12 0.6% Food & Beverage Stores 4 1.3% 178 9.00/0 Health & Personal Care Stores 5 1.6% 22 1.1% Clothing & Clothing Accessories Stores 0 0.00/0 0 0.00/0 Sport Goods, Hobby, Book, & Music Stores 1 0.3% 1 0.10/0 General Merchandise Stores 0 0.00/0 0 0.0% Insurance Carriers & Related Activities; Funds, Trusts 2 0.611/o 8 0.411/o Food Services & Drinking Places 7 2.2% 65 3.3% Source: ESRI, U.S. Census Bureau and Bureau of Labor Statistics —Consumer Expenditure Surveys One important business category that needs to be considered for the Subject Site is the restaurant and food purveyors businesses. The projected food and beverage spending growth for the retail market area is over $19-million for the next five (5) years as shown in Table 11 below. Food away from home spending growth is just over $11 -million, which is an indication that asit-down restaurant or fast-food restaurant use would do well in this location. Those types of uses rated very highly in the Planning Study survey noted in Section 2.0 This use is categorized as a primary opportunity in Table 10 above. It must be recognized that four (4) of the seven (7) eating and drinking places are related to golf course food &beverage operations, which is has very limited access to the general public. Table 11. Food and Beverage Expenditures 2022 2027 Projected Consumer Spending Forecasted Demand Spending Growth Food $66,204,983 $85,340,854 $19,135,871 Food at Home $38,757,263 $49,977,359 $11,220,096 Bakery and Cereal Products $4,968,132 $6,407,100 $1,438,968 Meats, Poultry, Fish, and Eggs $8,166,615 $10,529,557 $2,362,942 Dairy Products $3,915,227 $5,051,994 $1,136,767 Fruits and Vegetables $7,524,844 $9,705,995 $2,181,151 Snacks and Other Food at Home (10) $14,182,445 $18,282,713 $4,100,268 Food Away from Home $27,447,720 $35,363,494 $7,915,774 Alcoholic Beverages $47272,439 $5,512,890 $1,2401451 Source: ESRI, U.S. Census Bureau and Bureau of Labor Statistics —Consumer Expenditure Surveys 5.0 COMMERCIAL NEEDS ANALYSIS CONCLUSION The Consultant used all of the data and analysis in the previous sections to determine the total supply and demand for asmall-scale retail center sales in the Project's market area for the next 10 years. Using both the projected retail expenditures by retail type along with the existing businesses and future approved retail square footages, the Consultant then identified the types of retail businesses needed in the market area that would perform well on the Subject Site. The resulting analysis shows that the addition of t square feet of commercial affect the balance of c next 10 years. The Subject 7 it he Subject Site's 15,000 Area will not adversely ercial space to commercial demand over the Site is strategically located to take advantage of the future retail demand and the traffic flowing along oil well Road and Everglades Boulevard. The Subject Site will also make significant economic contributions to Collier County in terms of new salaries and wages plus sales taxes and property taxes. space to the arket The Market Area is currently assumed to be in equilibrium as economic studies is are efficient in terms of supply and demand and the have shown that marke future supply will be developed as the market grows and diversifies. acreage is already included in t The Project he vacant acreage total of the future commercial potential in the supple/demand calculations shown in Table 7 and w add ress the demand coming to the Market Area over the next 10 years. (Rest of Page Left Intentionally Blank) ill help The Applicant is exploring the potential for self -storage use in the Project. As Collier County continues to grow at a rapid pace, demand for self -storage space in the County exceeds the national average as more and more people from out of state find that Florida homes lack the basement and attic space to accommodate the belonging that occupy those spaces from their northern homes. In a story that appeared in the Naples Daily News two years ago (Appendix G, Page 95), data collected by Maxwell, Hendry & Simmons, LLC, a Southwest Florida real estate appraisal firm, noted that Collier County has approximately 9.02 square feet of storage space per person, which exceeds the national average of about 6.5 square feet of storage space per person. It should be noted that the square foot demand for storage space is much higher in the urban area of Collier County. The Naples urban area shows a demand of 16.42 square feet per capita (Appendix H, Page 98). Gerald Hendry, astate-certified real estate appraiser with the firm, pointed out that unlike other areas of the country, Southwest Florida doesn't have basements or other areas to store items that have been accumulated over the years. He also said that other storage components such as open storage for boats and RVs are in high demand as most of the communities that have been developed over the past few decades in Southwest Florida are deed restricted with no options for this type of storage. Mr. Hendry pointed out that the popularity of self-sfiorage facilities has paralleled the dramatic growth of rental apartment complexes in Lee and Collier Counties. He said that those units are small with limited storage thus many renters are opting to have a storage unit to store their extraneous items until such time they move into a larger living area. In a related self -storage story (Appendix I, Page � 00), Matt Price, CEO of Seagate Development points out that self -storage will always be gif in Florida because of the lack of basements and the extra storage space in an attic is too hot. He also said that there are a lot of people here and there is not a lot of places to put stuff. Ji -t Collier Blvd. immol�atee Road A VYilson Blvd. N. lap 0 .elf Wit 4t♦ a } �, ►46 4 i « Well Road P -Ever 1 �j • Randall Blvd. �t //�JJ/ , ��.=, � � � ` �� � � Golden Gate Bi vd. VIA,• «rt r.. �. y� w w The Consultant utilized Radius Union, an online tool that tracks self -storage market demographics, occupancy and rental rates in addition to new and existing self -storage supply. Figure 7 below indicates the location of existing and proposed self -storage facilities within a 5-mile radius of the Subject Site. There are (2) proposed self -storage facility in the Market Area. FIGURE 7. Subject Site 5-Mile Radius Self -Storage Supply " ` *t Immokalee Road # Subject Site i �V • ' F IF.. «►;*�-fir •� � e iW ritSl 9 � � }} s Wilson Blvd. Collier Blvd. Oil Well Road .N� t r r Randall Blvd. et 1 Source: Radius Union and Consultant Table 12 below identifies the two (2) proposed facilities and one (1) existing facility by map ID, name, address, square feet and year built. TABLE 42. Subject Site 5-Mile Radius Self -Storage Supply Map ID Facility Address Square Feet Permitted SF Year Built 1 Proposed in Mixed Use Site Randall Road 0 64,314 N/A 2 Outdoor Storage Facility Crystal Lake Drive 671532 0 Pre-2020 3 Proposed in Mixed Use Site Immokalee Road 0 89325 N/A 671532 153,639 Source: Radius Union, ESRI and Consultant Radius Union also provides demographic information for the Market Area. They utilize the same American Community Survey data that is provided by the U.S. Census Bureau as an annual update to their decennial census. The most recent decennial census was in 2020. The Consultant also uses the same data in its market studies as that data is provided by the Environmental Systems Research Institute's ("ESRI") geographic information system. Table 13 below encapsulates the 5-mile radius demographic data. TABLE 13. Subject Site 5-Mile Radius Demographics Population Year Population Growth Households Single Family Multifamily Renter Occupied Average Household Income Median Household Income Per Capita Income Median House Value Household Size 39,425 1.41% 13,448 11,969 1,479 1,381 $1451615 $1041282 $501149 $2511607 Source: Radius Union and U.S. Census Bureau 29 The Consultant next prepared the supply/demand analysis table using the data from previous Tables 1 & 2. The demand side of the equation was calculated by first using the Market Area population of 15,570 in the decennial year 2020 as the base year. The Collier County Growth Management Department estimates that the 1-year population growth between 2023 and 2024 is 1.4% for the Urban Estates Area (Appendix D, Page 88) The 1.4% growth figure was used to calculate future population growth for the Market Area. In order to determine the square footage demand for self -storage in the Market Area, the Consultant used the per capita demand for the County as there are currently no self -storage facilities in the Market Area. The existing self -storage square footage in the County (3,679,807) was divided by the County population (379,345) to determine the square foot per SF per capita) as shown in Table 14 below. capita demand for self -storage (9.70 TABLE 14. Collier County Self -Storage Demand Per Capita Colllier County Existing Net Self -Storage Square Feet 3,679,807 Collier County Permanent Population (2020 Census) 379,345 Collier County Self -Storage Square Feet per Capita 9.70 The Consultant took many homes on five Source: Radius Union and U.S. Census Bureau into consideration that the rural estates area con (5)-acre lots which have the room to accommodate sists of its own self -storage. By taki per capita demand, capita demand for th ng e out those homes as a percentage of the overall County the per capita demand would better reflect the actual per 5-mile market area. The following Table 15 below shows the percentage of homes in the 5-mile market area or urban clusters. that are in either urban areas TABLE 15. Subject Site 5-Mile Radius Housing Profile ?sri 0 GM Advisors 5-Mile Radius Prepared by Esri 13062 Immokalee Rd, Naples, Florida, 34120 LaL!L.L:u��L: 26.27613 Ring: 5 mile radius Longitude:-81.61083 Census 2020 Housing Units Number Percent Total 91076 100.0% In Urbanized Areas 3,290 36.2% In Urban Clusters 3,017 33.2% Rural Housing Units 21768 30.5% Source: Esri forecasts for 2023 and 2028. U.S. Census Bureau 2010 decennial Census data converted by Esri into 2020 geography. Source: Radius Union and U.S. Census Bureau By removing the rural housing units from the pe per capita demand for self -storage units coming 6.84 square feet as shown in Table 16 below. r capita calculation, the actual from the 5-mile market area is TABLE 16. Subject Site 5-Mile Radius Self -Storage Demand Per Capita Collier County Self -Storage Square Feet per Capita Percent in Urbanized Areas and Clusters Adjusted 5-Mile Market Area Square Feet Per Capita Source: Radius Union and U.S. Census Bureau 9.70 70.5 6.84 With the 5-mile market area population projections and the adjusted square feet per capita both calculated along with the current and future supply identified, the next step is to determine the supply/(deficit) of self -storage space through the horizon year of 2033. The existing self -storage facility on Crystal Lake Drive was eliminated from the calculations since it basically serves the Crystal Lake property owners (Figure 8 on the next page). FIGURE 8. Crystal Lake Drive Self Storage Facility h NN" lY►v► IiM' ►rr+�� wr r "0 40 TOMANq A, OM -.WV 0 LAQ PROPe" OM/l&'t at i L"Wv4d i row Source: Collier County Property Appraiser The proposed mixed -use self -storage facility was then added to the supply in 2024, the Pro Iect's 80,000 self -storage square feet in 2025 and the Randall at Orangetree in 2026. Table 17 below shows those calculations through a 10-year horizon from 2023 to 2033. TABLE 17. Subject Site 3-Mile Market Area Self -Storage Supply/Demand Analysis 2020-2026 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 3-Mile Population 39,425 39,981 40,545 41,116 41,696 42,284 42,880 Demand per Capita 6.84 Demand 269,667 New Projects) 0 6.84 273,469 U 6.84 277,325 0 6.84 281,236ra 285,201 64,314 6.84 289,222 80,000 293,300 89,325 Supply 0 0 0 0 64,314 144,314 233,639 Supply/(Defecit) (269,667) (273,469) (277,325) (281,236) (220,887) (144,908) (59,661) TABLE 17. Continued, 2027-2033 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 3-Mile Population 43,485 441098 441720 451350 45,990 461638 471296 Demand per Capita Demand New Projects) 6.84 297,43 6 301,630 C1� 6.84 305,883 0 6.84 310,196 C1] 6.84 314,569 0 319,005 6.84 323,503 C1� Supply 233,639 233,639 233,639 233,639 233,639 233,639 233,639 Supply/(Defecit) (63,797) (67,991) (72,244) (76,557) (80,930) (85,366) (89,864) Source: Radius Union, U.S. Census Bureau & Consultant Table 17 above indicates that the starting in the year 2023, showing a 281,236 square foot deficit of self -storage demand from the new population growth. The addition completed in 2024, the proposed 80,000 square feet in space of the Market Area is to address the 64, 659 25 and the 89, 325 square feet 20 are feet square feet in 2026 brings the deficit down to 59,661 squ in 2026. Additional Market Area self -storage facilities will be required in subsequent to address the future demand, which will still outpace the supply of self -st by nearly 90,000 square feet in the 2033 horizon year. ears orage y The Self -Storage analysis shows that there will be a continued demand for self - storage space in the 5-mile market area and that demand will be fueled by the emergence of the nearby villages and towns now being planned in the RLSA. ublic Survey Repor andall Blvd Planning Study -Community Survey 2 112023 6. 03 P M EDT Are you a resident, business owner, Or just driving through the area? 0 Resident # Field 1 Resident 2 Business Owner 3 Just Driving Through Business Owner Showing rows 1 - 4 of 4 Just Driving Through Choice Count 94.74°fo 54 0.OQ% 0 5, 26°fa 3 57 Q4 -HOW long have you been in this area? 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Less than 1 year # Field 1 Less than 1 year 11 1 to 5 years 12 6 to 10 years 13 11 to 15 years 14 More than 15 years 1 to 5 years 6 to 10 years Showing rows 1 - 6 of 6 11 to 15 years More than 15 years Ci101Ce Count 5.26% 3 35.00% 20 19.30% 11 14, 04°l0 8 26.32% 15 57 Q5 -What is one word you would use to describe the area today? DtAsine uS g �s, I iA III I kAl What is one word you would use to describe the area today? Overcrowded Annoying business Growing g Busy Underdeveloped Desolate Best area to live in Overly polulated with homes lackluster Not enough ammenties Having potential Vacant Far Casual Beautiful Nothing happening Growing Congested Country Depressing Peaceful Randall & Immok intersection poorly planned. Need more business and shoppng Dismal limited Undeveloped lacking Somewhat unsafe. Fast driving, Lack of traffic calming. Growing livable Not developed Peaceful Dangerous Estates Mixture quiet ! " iI i • i i i !" . .. !ST Serene peaceful Needing more stores, restaurants underdeveloped rural Clustered Up and coming Congested Jammed Empty Full DESTROYED over crowded villages creating dangerous traffic, accidents, destruction of environment. Q6 -What one word describes your vision for the area (b-IU years from now)? suLdLestain �Nhat one word describes your vision for the area (5-10 years from now)... Finished acceptable C roved e d Supermarket Anything but the funnel it is now. 0 what one word describes your vision for the area (5-10 years from now)... More shopping area More business, hospital, restaurant, supermarket Eventful Uncontrolled Commercial development, wider roads Convenience Useful Family community Rural Crowded Stores and supermarket option Convenient Sustainable Peaceful Diverse Rural Thriving what one word describes your vision for the area (5-iu years from now)... Peaceful Beautification Commercial open Commercial integrated Some mixed use development, but mostly preserved as natural area would be best. Improved walkability and bikeability. Peaceful Value more shopping Growing, accomodating Safe Estates Growth congested Respectful) What one word describes your vision for the area (5-10 years from now)... valuable Continued commercial plazas sustainability cluttered Swarmed Crowded Estate neighborhood Variety Commercial Homey CONGESTED If no control will be worse than Miami. Q7 -What types of activities would you like to see more of? (pick up to 4) 45 35 30 n # Field More Shopping and Restaurants Better o r More Bicycle and Pedestrian Connections 1 More Shopping and Restaurants 2 More Office Space 3 Better Roads Better Roads 4 Better or More Bicycle and Pedestrian Connections 5 More Open Space 6 More Residential Choices 7 Enhanced or More landscaping 8 Better Building Designs Enhanced or More Open Vlore Space Landscaping Showing rows 1 - 9 of 9 More Residential Choices Better Building Designs More Office Space Choice Count 2�.45a�o 41 18. (J6% 28 22.58% 35 14.32% 16 4.52% 7 12.26°l0 19 4.52°l0 7 155 Q8 -What are the biggest opportunities for this area? (pick up to 3) 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 # Field Can provide basic needs without over building in tl�e area 1 Still have time to plan for development Well connected to multiple locatior�s, ease of travel/access 2 Can provide basic needs without over building in the area 3 Well connected to multiple locations, ease of traveUaccess 4 Other Showing rows 1 - 5 of 5 Still have tune to plan for development Other Choice Count 22. �2°fo 19 40.48% 34 27.38% 23 9.52% 8 [EMS 11LIPM1111 iIIII iI IIIII III, IRAN ilium= Keeping the natural beauty by not overdeveloping. Opportunities to build market rate housing and housing that is affordable. Link this area to Immokalee for (not sure -need more time to think). Have a couple restaurant options. Some additional basic needs without over building the rural estates area. Need more restaurants and more shopping. Need more things for family activities. need post office nearby. Keep it rural. Also Why does the previous question not prove life for "less" times? Less noise, less night sky lightllight pollution, less compact development (which is Intentionally meant for villages and towns of RFMUD and RLSA) Do not permit dense villages or increase units in already developed communities -Orange Blossom Ranch for one. NO high-rises or town homes in communities, no building of landlocked villages that require destruction of environment of property of current residents to provide access road for theses RLSA villages. Q9 -What are the biggest challenges in this area 25 - 20 - 15- 10- 5- 0 Lack of places to eat and shop # Field 1 Lack of places to eat and shop 2 Lack of housing 3 Traffic 4 Lack of public spaces/parks 5 Lack of sidewalks 6 Stormwater/flooding 7 Other Traffic Lack of sidewalks ? (pick up to 3) Lack of public spaces/parks Showing rows 1 - 8 of 8 Sto rmwater/flo 0 ding Other Lack of housing Choice Count 28. (JQ°fo 35 2.44% 3 27.20°fo 34 13.6C}% 17 24.80°�0 26 4.so°�o s 3.2Q°/n 4 125 Need post office, banks, government office Lake of places to eat. Overdevelopment of rural residential neighborhoods. Increased traffic due to villages and increasing units in communities. Destruction of the Rural Area to satisfy developers I I'll i MIMpnic area o... Collier Fort Myers Airportlpine ridge/vanderbilt Walmart, Sams Club, Costco Juliet blvd, tarpon bay plaza mmokalee rd/ Tarpon Plaza Depends -Costco is farthest place away Pine ridge road North Naples North naples North Naples Usually to the area around Collier Blvd. and I mmokalee Rd as it's the closest North Naples Mercato, 5th avenue Downtown naples 951ICollier Blvd Collier & I mmokalee -Pine Ridge &Airport Pulling North Naples 41 and airport corridors. Mercado, intersection of corkscrew and immokalee, 41. Publix L'Appetite II. CVS. Pine ridge/airport pulling or Naples Blvd Collier, Naples East of Collier immokalee road corridor Mercado area usually North Naples Pine Ridge Naples Blvd Pine ridge or Valencia - - • • • IN • • • OMMIN ! i s a • # • ! - • • Immokalee rd and collier blvd 951IPebblebrook, Cogan landing, golden gate city, west of 951 Immokalee rd Immokalee Road west of 951 Pebblebrooke area Collier and Immokalee, Pine Ridge corridor 34105-34109 Naples Costco Ave Maria and Naples North naples Naples North Naples Naples Immokalee/951 Naples Stores along pine ridge or 951 Where do you go for shopping, restaurants, etc. (general geographic area on... I n Naples, Bonita Springs • " • • .''. What drew you to this area? Being away from the city. Affordable homeownership Space not living on top of each other I.NO H.O.A. to have to put up with Development Having land for my children and being away from all the "city" lights/more open space. We bought our first home of Everglades and 39th ne My husband grew up in golden gate. I grew up in Immokalee. Price for the home was a Lot more reasonable then 29 minutes west Close to my work, quiet Peaceful Cost and type of housing Peace Price of homes Urban area with mix of residential and commercial offering a variety of options. The fact that there are actual things to do and places to eat Affordable with a good school district Fine d4ning What drew you to this area? Not congestrd Value Demographics of Collier County especially Naples and North Naples. Then newspaper ad for new homes. Affordable housing with large lot. Born and raised in Naples. Moved from Naples Park in 1994 because it was growing to fast. Moved to U�lson blvd for peace and quite. Now out of Everglades and it's crazy insane busy. Sadly we are turning into Miami.:( Being rural, having few neighbors. Houses not be built on top of one another. Only area we could afford housing. The privacy on 4th st Schools Unable to have a boat on property in most areas peaceful, quiet, safe, affordable Property. housing prices and potential Cycling and natural area/wildlife viewing. less congestion and more reasonable home prices Quality of fife with Children lovely spot and acreage. what drew you to this area? Nice home The peace and quiet, lack of street lights, lack of neighbors, noise and intrusion. I have completed this survey before and you persist in not listening and continuing with your plans for building. It is Golden Gare Estates for a reason and it has nothing to do with your plans. Affordable housing Rural, quiet, dark skies, ag, large lots, wildlife, away from commercial and compact housing developments and one of the few alternatives to gated communities Price of housing with bigger lots Quiet, lots of green space, not a lot of traffic or other noise 4th street has always been unique to the estates. It's a quiet street. Great neighbors. I was born and raised in a city. Came here and just fell in love with this street. It's close to Immokalee Road for easy access but once I'm home it's quiet and relaxing. Not a lot of traffic, just neighbors. Can exercise on the street without a lot of cars and enjoy the wildlife. Close to work, serenity Growing area, reasonable housing, The remote area with land Rural enviroment and being surrounded by major parks. Beautiful landscape, wonderful weather, and clean city. Cost of living Peace, large parcels, low traffic Bigger property. Still near commercial. The country feel What drew you to this area? Cost of living, fast travel to town. There was going to be a big town center opening up in Rural Lands west but now that the project is canceled there's a dearth of commercial. Housing Seclusion, quiet (not so much anymore), large property The open spaces, lack of heavy traffic and auto pollution. The sound of birds, wind in the trees, now it is cars - construction. The sightings of wildlife -the rural environment the quiet away from city noise and pollution. To have pets, and no restrictions as to what the color of my house is, to be able to have a flag pole in my yard, to plants the plants I want - to have a garden. To sit on my lanai and enjoy the sounds of the birds, and frogs and breath fresh air and watch the sun set in the distance. IPL12 Wh," other • ` or • •hts would you like to snare wit us a/ What other comments or thoughts would you like to share with us 0 Driving in the Estates is extremely difficult. I understand wanting to bring more business and opportunities to this area, but without updating the roads and making the already difficult situation better FIRST, then the residents will always be the losers. Definitely this place need to be considered to build a Walmart Superstore. The majority of the people I know, needs to drive more than 40 minutes specially those who lives in I mmokalee and Ave Maria. like that there is growth but we don't need more buildings. We need more parks and areas for our children to play. I travel into town every single morning. My two choices of just getfiing onto Immokalee rd are either oilwell, where theres a school zone and traffic is always hell or I can take Everglades to randall then up to I mmokalee, Randal is al always packed with school buses. Its like a funnel out here trying to get into the city. think more development with places like Target, Costco, and other big name stores would thrive out this way. Also would allow smaller store fronts like Logan landings to have a chance to thrive. We need restaurants and shopping. Provide more shopping centers Some restaurants and a small amount of shops with a small park to walk in with a dog park would be great! Beautiful, serene Naples is becoming a nightmare. Would like a commercial subdistrict The area in question needs to be developed further in terms of shopping, dining etc as housing is already abundanfi. There are far too many houses end far too little goods and services available. Please add family entertainment like mini golf You need to highlight how new growth will be paid for -what is the additional cost to existing homeowners. Describe how large property owners can shift the cost of roads, water, electric, etc. to homeowners. We need you to represent us, not local lawyers, real estate agents or large land owners. We elected you to protect us. THX What other comments or thoughts Would you like to share with us? Whatever growth is planned, I hope very much that it is a priority to preserve and protect as much of the environment and the animals that inhabit the area is made. We've already developed a huge portion of Collier County and the space for wildlife is dwindling with every acre that becomes another plaza with a salon, wireless store and drive-thru coffee shop. You have been hearing for years now that are area would be built up but nothing has happened. Things need to move more quickly. when people buy a piece of property expecting things to happen in their area and they don't happen it's very frustrating. Please keep a buffer of trees between your commercial development and our private homes on 4th st. Be aware 4th street will need to be rebuilt to handle any more traffic as it is very very narrow and in rough shape. Failure to do so will be a major safety issue for both traffic and pedestrians/walkers who are plentiful on this street. Redesign traffic pattern at RandalUl mmokalee intersection. Publix plaza entrance/exit poorly planned. Desperately need Turn lanes, shoulders, lights. Very dangerous to drive on I mmokalle. I'm maintain the peaceful and safe area as top priority but add some options for food/drinks. The Estates lacks goods and services to serve the rapidly growing population east of Collier Blvd. I support development in this area. you have a large population and potential explosive growth again, you need better access/ infastructure and commercial opportunities Please preserve the area, build safer walking and biking and slow traffic! Please don't over build the area and destroy the beauty of the Estates along with pushing all the wildlife out. Road Improvements to encourage growth and property value demand. Youre doing a great job. Civic association price should drop to entice more people to register. I suggest we look into changing the name of Oil Well Rd. my home. It's time to update the name of the road. Care about those who live here -wildlife and humans alike. It's seriously embarrassing when I am giving directions to What other comments or thoughts would you Like to share with us? Why is this Commercial area being broadened when approved commercial areas have yet to be developed. (Randall shopping Center, 47 Acres @a Randall curve, Orangetree 100,000 sf commercial, Orange tree Commercial). Why is this apparent attempt to change Estates zoning to expand commercial into rural residential (E) Estates Lots. Should this expansion of commercial developments be directed to the RFMUD areas? This should all be removed from consideration of commercial development. This "study" should not cloud a needed transportation infrastructure improvement (which is already detailed and developed) with and expansion of commercial zoning. Ownership of 24th Ave NE to Immokalee Rd parcels indicates multiple owners With the exception of two immokalee road parcels owned by GM Advisors LLC. Owner of parcels between 24th Ave NW and Immokalee rd is Trinity Enterprise Holdings, associated with the Catholic diocese of Venice - a church has been rumored on this site for several years. Please post these comments as part of the public record, and share with all who participate in the public information meetings via in-person,/sign-in sheets, email, survey and/or texts. Traffic will prevent further growth if not addressed. It is a peaceful, residential area and should stay that way. It should NOT become another concrete jungle like the intersection of Immokalee Road and Collier Boulevard. I always thought the park would go in the Randall curve area so I'm not opposed to growth. However, I feel that 4th Street NE residents should be taken into consideration. This project needs to be tasteful and respectful. It should not be overdone. As time moves on and more people move to the estates we need to remember that the estates residents who have lived here the longest moved here for a reason I would like pleasant amenities, but not overdone. Responsible building with open public paces in the modern theme. This will improve value to homes in the area much like Oaks Blvd area, rather than destroying them by installing an urban area in a rural setting We do need more stores and restaurants. Founders Square will be a real asset, but we could have more places near Oil Well Rd. and Randall. You are overbuilding the area creating an ugly concrete jungle. Also, the fast and speedy influx of people moving in quickly are proving to be problematic. Evidence proves, the larger the city the more degraded it becomes. Violence, lack of respect, and tons more issue will ensue. Look at the many examples of ugly, violent, and horribly run cities like LA, Miami, Sacramento, Stockton, and a plethora more. Stop BUILDING! Too much traffics, speeding is intolerable and dangerous on Randall as is passing cars. Need to get roads and development under control. Lack of infrastructure money is a concern. Improvements to traffic in the area are really needed, especially replacing 4 way stops feeding into this area with traffic lights that are working at minimum during rush hour. what other comments or thoughts would you like to share with us? BUT now this is being destroyed by the Greed of RASA developing densely populated villages and increasing existing communities to compacity and getting approve to change the code to do so. Creating more traffic, pollution, noise and diesel and auto fumes in what was clean air. Destroying our roads with heavy equipment, tearing up property to build access roads for the landlocked villages and installing dangerous towers so these Villages, and dentsThis . Q8.a -Sentiment Negative Positive 0 # Field Negative Negative Positive Positive 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 Showing rows 1 - 3 of 3 5.5 L•� 6.5 Choice Count 75.Oo% 6 25. oo°fa 2 8 1 Q8.a -Sentiment Score Mlnlmum Maximum Mean -8.00 IZI -2.13 Std Deviation 5.93 Variance Count 35.11 0 1 Q8.a -Sentiment Polarity Std Minimum Maximum Mean Deviation 0.00 0.00 1 11 0.00 Variance Count 0.00 E'� #MIN �w � � g � v x Q8.a -Topics Unknown 1 # Field Unknown Unknown 2 3 Showing rows 1 - 1 of 1 0 7 Choice Count Zaa. aa% 8 1� 't � February 2021 ley -Horn and Associates 64 65 :NW Where is the Immokalee/Road Randall Boulevard Study Area? • Located in northern Collier County • Approximately 9 miles east and 8.5 miles north of k75 • Approximately 277 acres • 55 parcels IMM4KALEE R�ADIRANDALL BLVD PLANNING STUDY AREA O LEGEND I!�I�AOrCALEE HD'RANDALL BWU PLANIitNG STUDY AHEk ', RESID'cNTIALES+ATE35U8D1STRtCT � RAN CALL BLVD CQFiI?A: RC!AL SU BDIS T R:CT RURALSETTLE►JEMT ARIA SUBDISTRICT 0 500 MO Z000 1000 Feet 25th AVE NE an Bluff CT OIL WELL RD ao � ee W M W Y Zrnr� z e 24th AVE NE DAL' L BLVD 67 LE END • 3 w Study Area Boundary All all OUR TASK t ( y i �. to� r 14a, .' t1 a al pappr PF Assess current conditions J _ @ 1,P rov' direction t , .. LI �s • r ' ide o address unique • _ a Or Pa Ir Stir req u irements IF 04 P real 4 '♦r dentify needs .• for future developme " y � {,. -(11 �,J. Analyze . -4 tat : *y 'I /31- s it rj r t " • Ali all,-K a -rr or a S...r—.. s,.. .i. . i t tM v n r .''f �' a IMP _- ti Or let _sulting J4 * r t�om, i AM;4b r - _ ,� `y Rin....Long�Range Poky •.� sy Guidance andIdentifyIng IIIrad1 --- i l F L all, ar ar IL at tr rawrar • at _ lr attar at t r , ;� 69 Summary of Existing Conditions • Collier County and the study area are expected to see population growth • The majority (58.4%) of the study area is vacant according to the County Property Appraiser • Note: includes "approved" but not developed • The majority (93.7%) of the study area is zoned as Estates • The majority of the future land use is designated as Estates Designation (9664%) LEGEND Estates Designation Rural Settlement Area District ' Study Area Boundary 70 41L Summary of Existing Conditions • Immokalee Rd. and Wilson Blvd. are operating better than the adopted Level of Service (LOS) standards • Randall Blvd, is operating at the adopted LOS standard • The combined Water Treatment Plants have no known deficiencies and are operating below permitted capacity • The North County Water Reclamation Facility has no known deficiencies • Development/red eve lopmen Water South Florida review tor st t will require Management District ormwater management S RANDALL BLVD !ti 24TH AVE NE W z 0 low 22ND AVE NE °O 71 inc/siding Community Community Engagement • Public input meetings on November 30th and on January 14th • Extensive comments provided by the public at both meetings • Public online survey available November 19t" -December 10tn • Gave the public 3 weeks to provide input • In total, 57 people participated in the online survey �'��'�lI]1.I]� Ftl�►Il� ��l'i11�,tfCltl �'����.lil r Zoom lyeetin,g* for r �mmokalee Rd Randall Blvd ' Planning Study -- — �: l t The FurF-use of this =t_da' is to j + r ■ Evaluate the �i3-gin` [��r•dit?c.ns� •hJTure � r ccndi ion_., and recornmer. datiors for i r r r '■ ldentty tha Iand uEe [jolt sr ' r infrastru=:ure. nlacessarr tc support r r fu`uYe de:iielopment vairhin the � In^moka_lea Rcad,�Randall 6c-ule':_rd r ■ Esteh?ish guiding principle_ in ti e C vanent •ate,:tne Brea. , r 'der='.►'el=ome }'cur attenda��c_ and fe_doack � r Qate h'lc•nday Pdovemtaer 30, 20�n 5.30 TIM location This mertir,�t, wi=-I (y�l treld x�inncc�lY usln�r Ypet:+ F.F._• .n i 1rrE 3?�3 iamlanl +_olCttr C,be+nEV rrrnt Crnti, 6�+: FA�ftlr,� rucrr 73 • There is a common vision for a sustainable balance between (re)development cnd the environment without overbuilding the study area • Extended drives currently required (to other parts of the County such as North Naples for jobs, shopping, and restaurant options) • Main takeaways: • Protection of existing environmental resources • More public open spaces • Increased commercial/restaurant/retail options • Improved roadways that provide for a reduction in traffic and increased mobility options Keeping the nature! beauty by not over developing. developing. C�ppartunities to build market rate houisng and housing that is affordable. - : Have a couple of restaurant options. ` ome additional basic needs without over=building the area. deed rt;or � r estaurants and r77ot e shopping. !Need r�7ore things for family activities. _ Please preserve the LT- ea, bcrilcl safer vtraikir�g and bikir ag end slow traffic. l would like pleasant amenities, but not overdone. Responsible building with open public paces in the modern theme. 74 Market Study* • By 2030 the commercial allocation ratio within a 15-minute drive time is predicted to be below the County's and DEO's recommended allocation ratios. • The Collier County inventory of condominium units will be negative by the year 2025. For the market area, the total supply of market rate apartments will be negative by 2022. • Projections take into account vacant land that can be developed as commercial or multi family residential and are still predicting a demand in the coming years. * "Commercial Need Analysis and Residential Market Study for Subject Property at the Northeast Corner of 4th Street N.E. and Immokalee Road Collier County, August 26, 2020 prepared by Real Estate Econometrics, Inc. 75 • Current future land use: 23 du & 700,000 sq. ft. of commercial • BEBR average is 2.36 people per household = 54 people • Population within a 5-minute drive time is predicted to grow by 8,479 people by 2040 • Study area can currently accommodate 0.6% of the projected population growth within a 5-minute drive time 76 • Mixed Use Development Opportunity: • Properties south of Randall Blvd. currently allow for commercial development • Instead of only allowing commercial... • Encourage a mix of retail, restaurant, office, medium density residential, and civic/public uses (i.e., post office, library, etc.) in response to public feedback • Encourage walkable destination that creates sense of place instead of possible strip malls • New mixed -use district will accommodate the population growth predicted by CIGM and the demand that is shown in the Market Study 77 Create a live, work and play environment and establish an urban form that is both aesthetic and unique to this place �'tIKIIC ��ACES � f�I�E�� �.rrr�E Protiide intrinsic environmental, aesthetic, and recreational opportunities to the surrorurding community rlIULTIb10DAl �a�Tl'��i7K Establish a highly connected, pedestrian friendly renter that integrates bicycle and pedestrian amenities including' - cross roadways • A (new) Randall Mixed -Use subdistrict for the properties at the main intersection of Blvd. and Immokalee Rd. • Encourage a mix of retail, restaurant, office, medium density residential, and civic/public uses (i.e., post office, library, etc.) • Provide mix of housing options for varied family sizes in capturing the predicted growth • Provide for the daily needs of residents • Attract and retain a sustainable employment base an d income to assist 79 • r Services +Community Comments 81 Conclusion • • • Next Steps? 82 Demand (per the Market Study)* Determined the oversupply or undersupply of commercial space in the 15-minute drive time area both with the current existing and potential commercial square footage. • County uses a 1.15 allocation ratio as a measuring stick. DEO recommends 1.25 allocation ratio. The 2030 allocation ratio is below the County and recommended allocation ratio. Table �. Drive Time Demand -Supply Calculation Retail Gemc�nd (sq. ft_} 2020 214)25 2a30 2035 2040 2045 Demand Per Grv1D Commercial Inventory & Population I,213,473 Retail Supply Geveleped 725,404 'Jaclilt 1/0261000 Total Supply I ,751,404 1,335,42U 72F,404 I ,026,OOU l ,751,404 1,57��,788 725,404 1,026.000 1,75 I.404 i ,875.216 725►.404 I ,026,a00 ,75� �1,404 2,2�3��,305 725,404 ,026,OU0 I.751.404 2,506.484 725,404 I ,a26,C�a0 1,75�1,404 Allocation Ratio 1.44 1.31 1.11 0.93 0.79 0.0$ Source: Collier County Comprehensive Plannit�q Section. Collier county Froperht Apprai ;er, ESRI ARCgis m�ippinq system and the Consultant * "Commercial Need Analysis and Residential Market Studyfor Subject Property at the Northeast Corner of 4th Street N.E. and Immokalee Road Collier County, Flc August 26, 2020 prepared by Real Estate Econometrics, Inc. 83 The Collier County inventory of condominium units will be depleted by the year 2025. The total supply of market rate apartments will turn negative in 2022 for the market area. Table 15. Future Collier County Multi-Famify Market lnven#ory 2020 2o2i 2022 _ Vacant Developed Units 1,060 673 558 558 558 558 558 Annual Starts 558 558 558 558 558 558 558 Remaining Vacant Developed Units 502 115 0 0 0 0 0 Future Inventory 2,061 2,005 11447 889 ,331 -227 -785, Source: MetroStudy Report, 111 Quarter 2020 Table 25. Apartment Study Market Area Supply -Demand Analysis °o With % of Units Income with rent Total Percent Rental up to Annual $800- Unit Surplus/Deficit yaar Pnnulatinn HnusPhnlds Rental Hnuseholds S100k Demand 51.900 Demand Market Suoolv Units 2020 297,813 129,054 19.8% 25,553 64.8% 161558 74.71ro 12,371 12,552 181 2021 303,051 1311410 19.8°/a 26,072 64.0% 16,686 7431% 12,467 121552 85 2022 308,289 133,766 19.9°% 261593 63.2olo 16,807 74.71% 12,557 12,552 -5 2023 313,527 136,121 19.9% 27,115 62.4% 16,920 74.71c.10 12,642 12,552 -90 * "Commercial Need Analysis and Residential Market Study 2024 3181765 138,477 20.0°% 27,640 6106% 17,026 74.71% 12,721 12,552 -169 for Subject Property at the Northeast Corner of 41h Street 2025 324,003 140,833 20.0°% 28,167 60.8% 17,125 74.71% 12,795 12,552 -243 N.E. and Immokalee Road Collier County, Florida" August 26, 2020 prepared by Real Estate Econometrics, Inc. Source: Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section, Collier County Property Appraiser, ESRI ARCgis mapping system and the Con=ultant Conclusion "Recognizing" that ongoing growth is essential to the study area's success, the County should: • Promote the preferr subdistrict - ed growth strategy through a (new) Mixed -Use • Allow for new/mix of uses such as commercial, office, institutional, and medium density residential uses • Provide appropriate density and intensity • Include incentive -based methods • Require enhanced bicycle and cede • Establish " context sensitive" strian facilities development standards civic, • Reflect community's vision for the area, are unique from other areas in the Estates, and which create a coordinated theme among new and proposed developments in the study area �• % Share Typical Typical of GLA Number Type of Shopping Center Aggregate GLA Industry Average Size Range (Sq. % Anchor of Trade Area Center Concept Count (Sq. Ft.) GLA (Sq. Ft.) Ft, Acres # of Anchors GLA Tenants Typical Type of Anchors Size GeneralmPurpose Full -line or junior department Super -Regional Mall Similar in concept to regional malls, but offering more 620 77813361548 10.2% 11255,382 800,000+ 60-120 store, mass merchant, discount 3+ 50-70% NA 5-25 miles variety and assortment. department store and/or fashion apparel store. General merchandise orfashion-oriented offerings. Full -line or junior department Typically, enclosed with inward -facing stores connected by 4001000- 40-80 store, mass merchant, discount 5-15 Regional Mall a common walkway. Parking surrounds the outside 600 35317951548 4.7% 5891659 8001000 40-100 2+ 50-70% stores department store and/or fashion miles perimeter. apparel store. General merchandise or convenience- oriented offerings. Discount store, supermarket, drug, Community Center Wider range of apparel and other soft goods offerings than large -specialty discount (toys, ("Large neighborhood centers. The center is usually configured in a 91776 11930,849,736 25.4% 1971509 1251000- 10-40 2+ 40-60% 1540 books, electronics, home 3-6 miles Neighborhood straight line as a strip, or may be laid out in an L or U 4001000 stores improvement/furnishings or Center„) shape, depending on the site and design. sporting goods, etc.) Neighborhood Convenience oriented. 321588 2,34017111371 30.8% 71 827 301000- 3-5 1+ 30-50% 0 Supermarket 3 miles Center 125 000 stores Attached row of stores or service outlets managed as a coherent retail entity, with on -site parking usually located in front of the stores. Open canopies may connect the store fronts, but a strip center does not have enclosed Anchor -less or a small Convenience store, such as a mini- Strip/Convenience walkways linking the stores. A strip center may be 68,936 911,202,922 12.0% 13,218 < 30,000 <3 NA NA <1 mile convenience- mart. configured in a straight line, or have an "L" or "U" shape. A store anchor. convenience center is among the smallest of the centers, whose tenants provide a narrow mix of goods and personal services to a very limited trade area. Special .. Category killers, such as home Category -dominant anchors, including discount 250,000- improvement, discount Power Center department stores, off -price stores, wholesale clubs, with 21258 990,4161667 13.0% 438,626 600,000 25-80 3+ 70-90% NA department, warehouse club and 5-10 miles only a few small tenants. off -price stores Lifestyle Upscale national -chain specialty stores with dining and 491 164,9031247 2.2% 335,852 1501000- 10-40 0-2 0-50% NA Large format upscale specialty 8-12 miles entertainment in an outdoor setting. 500 000 Manufacturers' and retailers' outlet stores selling brand- 367 87,368,113 1.2% 238,060 50 000- 10-50 NA NA NA Manufacturers' and retailers' 25-75 miles Factory Outlet name goods at a discount. 4001000 outlets Leisure, tourist, retail and service -oriented offerings with Theme/Festival entertaiment as a unifying theme. Often located in urban 159 23,498,769 0.3% 1471791 80,000- 5-20 Unspecified NA NA Restaurants, entertainment 25-75 miles areas, they may be adapted from older --sometimes 2501000 historic --buildings and can be part of a mixed -use project. ..Property of retail stores located within a commercial 750000- No anchors; retail includes NA Airport Ret EHConsolidation Airport Retail 62 15,452,860 0.2% 249,240 N/� NA NA NA 300,000 specialty retail and restaurants airport Total Industry Traditional + Specialty + Special Purpose MAW 1115,857 71596,535,7811 10000%1 65,568 Total industry Sources: ICSC Research and Costar Realty Information, Inc . (www.costar.com) 87 January 2017 COLLIER CdUNTY PERN'tANENT PdPUL,4TIdN ESTINtiATES and PROJECTIONS estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates Flmsnirtg Cn�n»trtni�h� 2000 �10 .ill 2�12 2�13 $�14 ;t•�mates �17 estimates �1$ By Planning Cornmcrnit~y �rrd City estimates projections projections projections �1 � �Q1 �22 projections 3 projections prof 2�4 e NN -North Naples ��,8�7 55,105 55,442 55,934 56,257 56,561 57,052 57,714 58,393 58,956 59,385 59,663 59,866 60,073 60,284 60,499 6 SN -South Naples 22, 02Q 28,859 29,490 30,269 30,829 32,037 33,318 33,842 34,304 34,882 35,372 35,617 35,787 35,959 36,135 36,314 3 CN -Central Naples 98,6d+ 18,856 18,917 18,994 19,059 19,146 19,253 19,422 19,580 19,634 19,675 20,021 20,653 21,298 21,954 22 3 2 EN -East Naples 24, � 7 2 22,322 22,340 22,370 22,390 22,540 22,818 23,076 23,361 23,699 24,714 25,784 26,244 26,714 27,192 27 2 GG -Golden Gate 3�,�9� 44,963 45,142 45,351 45,454 45,498 45,523 45,557 45,624 45,852 46,198 46,552 46,930 47,315 47,707 48,106 4 U E -Urban Estates � 7, 8�4 38,744 39,157 39, 784 40, 480 41, 594 43, 058 44, 469 45, 937 47, 508 48, 983 50, 034 50, 729 51,436 52i157 52-,891 b RE -Rural Estates 99,997 3d,760 34,861 35,015 35,141 35,337 35,753 36,686 38,566 41,048 43,895 46,559 48,741 50,965 53,230 55,539 5 M -Marco 1,3�J 1,221 1,223 1,226 1,263 1,319 1,476 1,775 2,057 2,228 2,356 2,434 2,439 2,444 2,450 2,455 RF -Royal Fakapalm 8,127 12,001 12,667 13,494 14,126 14,859 15,741 16,505 17,723 19,246 20,557 21,813 23,025 24,259 25,517 26,799 2 C -Corkscrew 1, 9 94 4,962 6,372 7,804 8,614 9,679 10,927 12,080 13,545 14,866 15,933 16,851 17,466 18,092 18,731 19,381 1 I - I m m a k al e e 22, 032 24, 303 24, 569 24, 745 24, 819 24, 868 24, 954 25, 083 25, 317 25, 593 25, 875 26, 090 26, 201 26,314 26,429 26,546 2 BC -Big Cypress 994 233 235 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 247 248 249 LTiiincor�oraled S�i�,f 22i, 939 286,328 290,414 295,223 298,670 303,679 310,112 316,450 324,649 333,755 343,185 351,672 estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates projections Cities � �10 r^A?11 �1� �13 �14 a115 �316 �17 �16 �l a � 358,354 projections �21 365,163 projections �22 372,101 projections �'�3 379,170 projections 0�4 Kf-J proj P c Everglades City 484 403 404 405 409 41$ 430 438 426 418 429 432 435 438 441 445 Marco Island 14, 473 16,428 16,482 16,539 16,582 16,668 16,829 16,983 17,065 17,221 17,472 17,604 17,621 17,639 17,656 17,673 1 Naples 21,332 19,494 19,518 19,590 19,563 19,529 19,632 19,966 20,270 20,633 20,993 21,230 21,565 21,899 22,233 22,568 2 Incarparaled S�+lt 3tS, 788 36,325 36,403 36,533 36,553 36,614 36,890 37,386 37,760 38,272 38,893 39,265 39,620 39,975 40,331 40,686 4 COUNT''�1I�tIDE T�T�L 257,�26 322,653 326,817 331,756 335,223 340,293 347,002 353,836 362,409 372,027 382,078 390,937 397,975 405,138 412,431 419,855 42 n otw: �� _rna�a osei metoa a na pro�aotlona ero GesaG upon tna apraeasnaat or par menant popuieelon praperaa ror �iprli �, ��� a nd 2��0-2��. E3t� meta) end preJootlona ero dorlvaG rrom dote oDtelncd from: 2� �.oneue end �'LQ10 �ansu:; 6uroeu of Eoono mlo and �ualnoss t�asaeron (BEBR) PaP��etion oullt-tins; Colllor .aunty �omprohonaivoPlennl n7 stern; •nd, Planning ateYt fro m Neplc: •nd i�eroo �ilentl. �� So mo or tho I otels rney not aquel tha su m of tn4 I nalvldual tlgura� aua to rouncfl ng. Pr�Fured by Collier County Zoning l�ivisior�, Jurte 1 A, 2Q21. 7711 10, Alk 13062. Immokalee Rd. 12804-13250 Immokalee Rd, Naples, Florida, 34120 Prepared by Es Latitude: 26.2761 Ring: 3 mile radius Longitude:-81.6028 20Z2 Housing Summary Housing Units 2022-2027 Percent Change Percent Occupied Percent Owner Households Median Home Value Owned Dwellings Mortgage/Other Loan Payments & Basics Mortgage Interest Interest Paid on Home Equity Loan Interest Paid on Home Equity Line of Credit Mortgage Principal Principal Paid on Home Equity Loan Principal Paid on Home Equity Line of Credit Special Lump Sum Mortgage Payments Special Assessments Closing Costs Property Taxes Homeowners Insurance Ground Rent Maintenance and Remodeling Services Maintenance and Remodeling Materials Property Management and Security Rented Dwellings Rent Tenant's Insurance Maintenance and Repair Services Maintenance and Repair Materials Other Lodging Owned Vacation Homes Principal Paid on Home Loans Closing Costs on Purchase of Property Interest Paid on Home Loans Property Taxes Homeowners Insurance Maintenance and Remodeling Property Management and Security Housing While Attending School Household Operations Child Care Care for Elderly or Handicapped Appliance Rental and Repair Computer Information Services Home Security System Services Non -Apparel Household Laundry/Dry Cleaning Housekeeping Services Lawn and Garden Moving/Storage/Freight Express Installation of Computers PC Repair (Personal Use) Reupholstering/Furniture Repair Termite/Pest Control Water Softening Services Internet Services Away from Home Other Home Services (1) 2022 Demographic Summary 5,903 Population 15,570 8.06% Households 51250 89.00/0 Families 41357 92.9% Median Age 39.4 $3551918 Median Household Income $106,370 Spending Potential Average Amount Index Spent Total 132 $21,452083 $112,627,346 133 $16,055.51 $84,291,449 144 $5,368.49 $28,184,595 104 $40.64 $213,377 117 $169.43 $889,521 138 $3,723039 $191547,806 107 $84.95 $445,963 134 $421068 $2,213,825 131 $11154.27 $6,059,900 97 $12.27 $64,400 143 $498207 $2,6141888 116 $3,599259 $18,897,863 130 $876057 $41602,000 135 $106015 $557,310 131 $4,280,66 $22,473,453 136 $954.09 $5,008,992 120 $162056 $853,452 87 $5,257039 $27,601,274 86 $5,098279 $26,768,662 98 $36.35 $190,822 112 $83.30 $437,326 117 $38.95 $204,464 115 $740074 $3,888,898 113 $617006 $3,239,542 120 $88.16 $462,842 109 $41.47 $217,739 120 $115036 $605,623 110 $171.21 $898,865 105 $16.14 $84,755 107 $146058 $769,557 120 $38.13 $200,161 125 $123069 $649,355 124 $31116.60 $16,362,128 129 $777.42 $41081,474 107 $76.01 $399,070 129 $36.76 $192,984 118 $890080 $4,676,713 140 $68.12 $357,642 107 $29.38 $154,233 125 $267091 $1,406,515 124 $708.99 $3,722,184 130 $105020 $552,313 131 $0.55 $2,878 118 $9.27 $48,675 122 $14.10 $74,015 141 $68.21 $358,104 129 $8.68 $45,570 118 $5.56 $29,202 140 $49.63 $260,555 Data Note: The Spending Potential Index (SPI) is household -based, and represents the amount spent for a product or service relative to a national average of 100. Detail may not sum to totals due to rounding. Source: Esri forecasts for 2022 and 2027; Consumer Spending data are derived from the 2018 and 2019 Consumer Expenditure Surveys, Bureau of Labor Statistics. April 28, 202 91 13062 Immokalee Rd. Prepared by Es 12804-13250 Immokalee Rd, Naples, Florida, 34120 Latitude: 26.2761 Ring: 3 mile radius Longitude:-81.6028 Spending Potential Average Amount Index Spent Total Utilities, Fuels, Public Services 122 $6,872.86 $36,082,519 Bottled Gas 126 $75.19 $394,733 Electricity 122 $2,517077 $13,218,280 Fuel Oil 96 $87.64 $460,096 Natural Gas 106 $624.53 $3,278,792 Phone Services 122 $2,399.02 $12,594,871 Water and Other Public Services 132 $1,152.38 $6,049,975 Coal/Wood/Other Fuel 187 $16.34 $85,772 Housekeeping Supplies 121 $1,073.86 $5,637,780 Laundry and Cleaning Supplies 124 $316018 $1,659,941 Postage and Stationery 124 $219035 $1,1511596 Other HH Products (2) 119 $538033 $2,826,243 Household Textiles 121 $139081 $734,005 Bathroom Linens 117 $21.46 $112,645 Bedroom Linens 121 $73.19 $384,226 Kitchen, Dining Room and other Linens 123 $13.29 $69,750 Curtains and Draperies 128 $23.20 $121,825 Slipcovers, Decorative Pillows 116 $8.68 $45,559 Furniture 124 $900248 $4,727,537 Mattresses and Box Springs 121 $160027 $841,404 Other Bedroom Furniture 126 $164299 $866,179 Sofas 123 $248894 $1,3061r932 Living Room Chairs 124 $72.77 $382,033 Living Room Tables 123 $24.76 $129,965 Kitchen, Dining Room Furniture 119 $70.98 $372,632 Infant Furniture 123 $17.64 $92,631 Outdoor Furniture 132 $55.48 $291,273 Wall Units, Cabinets, Other Furniture (3) 130 $84.66 $444,486 Major Appliances 131 $563027 $2,957,158 Dishwashers, Disposals & Range Hoods 138 $50.90 $267,225 Refrigerators and Freezers 136 $161.87 $849,802 Clothes Washers & Dryers 134 $161084 $849,679 Cooking Stoves and Ovens 132 $81.95 $430,219 Microwave Ovens 122 $25.91 $136,027 Window Air Conditioners 104 $9.33 $49,005 Electric Floor Cleaning Equipment 125 $39.77 $208,800 Sewing Machines and Miscellaneous Appliances 114 $31.70 $166,402 Data Note: The Spending Potential Index (SPI) is household -based, and represents the amount spent for a product or service relative to a national average of 100. Detai may not sum to totals due to rounding. Source: Esri forecasts for 2022 and 2027; Consumer Spending data are derived from the 2018 and 2019 Consumer Expenditure Surveys, Bureau of Labor Statistics. pril 28, 202 9 13062 Prepared by Esri 12804-13250 Latitude: 26.27613 Rings: 3 mile radii Longitude:-81.60288 Businesses Employees Number Percent Number Percent Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting 2 0.6% 1 0.1% Mining 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Utilities 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Construction 64 20.3% 199 10.0% Manufacturing 4 1.3% 27 1.4% Wholesale Trade 10 3.2% 31 1.6% Retail Trade 28 8.9% 256 12.9% Motor Vehicle & Parts Dealers 1 0.3% 7 0.4% Furniture & Home Furnishings Stores 3 1.00/0 9 0.5% Electronics & Appliance Stores 1 0.3% 9 0.5% Bldg Material & Garden Equipment & Supplies Dealers 7 2.2% 12 0.6% Food & Beverage Stores 4 1.3% 178 9.00/0 Health & Personal Care Stores 5 1.6% 22 1.1% Gasoline Stations 1 0.3% 12 0.6% Clothing & Clothing Accessories Stores 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Sport Goods, Hobby, Book, & Music Stores 1 0.3% 1 0.1% General Merchandise Stores 0 0.0% 0 0.00/0 Miscellaneous Store Retailers 2 0.6% 6 0.3% Nonstore Retailers 3 1.00/0 0 0.0% Transportation & Warehousing 9 2.9% 16 0.8% Information 3 1.0% 23 1.2% Finance & Insurance 6 1.9% 24 1.2% Central Bank/Credit Intermediation & Related Activities 3 1.0% 11 0.6% Securities, Commodity Contracts & Other Financial 2 0.6% 4 0.2% Insurance Carriers & Related Activities; Funds, Trusts & 2 0.6% 8 0.4% Real Estate, Rental & Leasing 9 2.9% 41 2.1% Professional, Scientific & Tech Services 28 8.9% 167 8.4% Legal Services 2 0.6% 6 0.3% Management of Companies & Enterprises 2 0.6% 47 2.4% Administrative & Support & Waste Management & 27 8.6% 154 7.8% Educational Services 10 3.2% 402 20.3% Health Care & Social Assistance 9 2.9% 76 3.8% Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 11 3.5% 252 12.7% Accommodation & Food Services 7 2.2% 65 3.3% Accommodation 0 0.0% 0 0.00/0 Food Services & Drinking Places 7 2.2% 65 3.3% Other Services (except Public Administration) 37 11.7% 128 6.5% Automotive Repair & Maintenance 5 1.6% 12 0.6% Public Administration 4 1.3% 73 3.7% Unclassified Establishments Total 47 14.9% 2 0.10/0 315 100.0% 1,981 100.0% Source: Copyright 2022 Data Axle, Inc. All rights reserved. Esri Total Date Note: Data on the Business Summary report is which uses census block groups to East Naples sees influx of self storage facilities along U.S. 41 hops://www.naplesnews.com/story/money/business/local/2019/10/16/eas... LOCAL BUSINESS ? Here's why I i ng an Andrew Wigdor �: Naples Published 7900 a.m. ET Oct. 16, 2019 Updated 4:10 p.m. ET Oct. 16, 2019 Development in East Naples keeps coming but not in the form some residents support. Self -storage facilities are popping up fast in Collier County, and East Naples is no exception. In particular, an influx of large storage buildings has been seen along the community's major thoroughfare, and some residents say these commodities ta�� up prime real estate on U.S. 41 that could be better used for upscale restaurants, hotels and shopping centers. In the 12-mile stretch from Sandpiper Street to Basik Drive along U.S. 41, there are nine self -storage buildings that have been built, are being built or are proposed. Of those, four are already built, four are proposed and one is in the process of being built. The self - storage building currently being constructed is Carl's White Glove Personal Storage & Wine Vault, athree-story structure that will be over 90,00o square feet. The projected opening date for the facility is Feb. 1, 2020. Bruce Nichols, the facility's wine consultant and owner of The Wine Store in Naples, defended the construction of the new storage building, saying that the "demand far outweighs supply for wine storage" in the area. "The demand is certainly there," he said. According to data collected by Maxwell, Hendry & Simmons , LLC, a Southwest Florida East Naples sees influx of self stot•age facilities along U.S. 41 https://www.naplesnews.com/story/money/business/local/2019/10/16/eas... real estate appraisal firm, Collie space per pe space per pe square feet of storage rson, which exceeds the national average of about 6.5 square feet of storage r County has approximately g.o2 't that have been accumulated over the years," rson. "Unlike other areas of the country, we don have basements or other areas to store items state -certified real estate appraiser with the firm, in an emailed statement. "Moreover, other storage components such as open storage for boats and RVs are in high demand as most of the communities that we have developed over the past few decades are deed restricted with no options for this type of storage." said Gerald Hendry, a 2 of 6 97 2/28/2022, 5:42 PM ial I��s tcr�s+ !�1 ! 1m 2m 2*A 4ti 7ft lam l---�! r�rrr� aM, f ! ::Sd�Crmga ilflpr�: !Wane � � 1' � � �1i'ttltr�!rRlpRie: • ar Gh 0 Y�11�Iiij Leta • ilrantllzC i Alt a=o OFF, Fowl — w---- F. fi„ • air �!; �.s�,y CCUniY{ Gkt7� - ' IF,IIIIII FA OFF& IF dot 41 r (! spiv WWI --- Glii•?'f� F o c Ca. fLoUEFAA WQ F � � / f 1- rosin f1�9'T�.��1'If~'GEs Fa�ziti�� ru Faf�ty ToCaS�r� ko�,ge C�riia:ir�rtf Mg 1� y%f.1 1f5.4� t+ F�-anrlrtGfitr ;'fed UQ�?'r�r�t4tLe' �l�i�k+ith- Developer makes big gains in self-stot•age � Business Observer � Busines... https://www.businessobserve�•fl.com/al-ticle/developer-makes-big-gains-i... '�T�TC1;�.7 d��7 ��� �� ii7 � �y i�r � d BUSINESS OBSERVER Developer makes big gains inself-storage SHARE f �` 0 THURSDAY, OCT. 29, 2020 1 year ago COMMENTS a r It doesn't have the sizzle ofmultimillion-dollar construction projects. But self -storage done right, discovers one area firm, could deliver a tidy profit. by: Mark Gordon � Managing Editor Seagate Development Group has built a brand in the Southwest Florida construction market by building corporate headquarters. The recent list includes a 150,000-square-foot complex for cancer screening firm NeoGenomics, a $60 million project in Fort Myers; a 52,000-square-foot facilityfor Conditioned Air of Naples; and a new, $11 million home in Fort Myers for logistics firm Scotlynn USA. Although those projects grab headlines, and of course bring in revenue for the $65.5 million company, Seagate is, more quietly, developing a profitable niche `The next 10, 20 years in Southwest Florida have a really long runway. I KT _E 1 of 8 2/28/2022, 6:16 PM Developer makes big gains in self -storage � Business Observer � Busines... hops://www.businessobserverfl.com/article/developer-makes-big-gains-i... Q terms of reaching profitable rent stabilization., company executives say —including one that opened in April, during the depths of pandemic stay-at-home orders. "Self -storage will always be big in Florida because of the lack of basements, and the extra storage space in an attic is too hot," Seagate CEO Matt Price says. "There are a lot of people, and. there's not a lot of places to put stuff. It helps that Seagate attacked the self -storage market with a counterintuitive twist. The traditional way developers build self -storage is to go near, next to or across the street from multifamily projects. Those are infill projects that, Price says, go where the "bodies are." Instead of that, Price says Seagate aims to build self - storage facilities "where the bodies are going to be." In that way, the company's approach isdata-driven on making the right land purchases as to where development is going to happen next in the Lee -Collier area. Combined, it paid around $3 million for the land where it built its first three self -storage facilities. Those locations are University Storage in Estero, a 90,000-square-foot, three-story, 600-unit facility; Ave Maria, a 51,000-square-foot, one-story, two -building facility; and Arbor Towne in Fort Myers, a 76,000-square-foot, 654-unit facility. Through Oct. 21, those facilities were 53.44%, 55.48%and 71.7% leased out, respectively. The goal is to get to PREv cupancy in each facility, which, says Bill Price, Seagate's chairman and Matt Price's father, wool NEXT ARTICLE ARTICLE �u��.. profit. "One of the best parts about the business is once you sign the lease, people tend to stay," ��u Price says. "It's very, very much an inertia business: Once you're are in, you tend to stay in." Courtesy. Seagate Development Group's Arbor Towne self -storage facility is on Colonial Boulevard in Fort Myers. Not only does Seagate loolz at future population patterns, but also the Witty -gritty ofself-storage, adds Bill Price, is in the ground cost per- buildablesquare foot. That's the combination of the cost per square foot for the land and cost per square foot to build the facility. Too high a figure, and the building can't set competitive lease rates. "That's really important," Bill Price says. Another key to Seagate's model, the elder Price says, is to partner with the right self -storage flag. For Seagate, that's CubeSmart, a Pennsylvania - based Real Estate Investment Trust that manages some 500seif-storage properties nationwide, covering more than 35 million rentable square feet. Working with CubeSmart is a nod to another lesson the company has learned: Stick to your strengths. "We quickly realized we had no clue how to do all this," Bill Price says. "We needed a sophisticated company with data algorithms" that could handle leasing, pricing, marketing 2 of 8 2/28/2022, 6:16 PM Developer makes big gains in self -storage � Business Observer � Busines... https://www.businessobservet•fl.com/article/developer-makes-big-gains-i... Seagate was approached by a business partner three years ago about self -storage opportunities. The firm did research and due diligence for eight months. "we really wanted to understand the complexities of the usiness, Matt Price says. area in the country.' Matt Price, Seagate Development Group With that understanding and the early success, the company plans to expand its self -storage portfolio. It's looking "seriously" at two possible deals, Matt Price says, and if "the land part makes sense, we will consider d0111g 1t." In the meantime, the company isn't slowing down on its headquarters or other projects. Like many peers in construction, 2020 was going really well until the coronavirus derailed it. "It hasn't been as bad as we thought," Matt Price says of the ensuing pandemic, "but we are aren't having the kind of year it was going to be before COVID-19." Long-term, Price remains all -in on the region's potential. "Z�he next 10, 20 years in Southwest Florida have a really long runway," Price says. "I wouldn't trade our Southwest Florida business market for Ynost any other area in t e country. PREY ARTICLE NEXT ARTICLE �-- Prev Article advertisement advertisement Next Article � Q 3 of 8 2/28/2022, 6:16 PM J:l�IJJ: r: ern PPrimptpr P PROPERTY o Zo LINE I0 50 Western Perimeter Buffer ffi U HOLEMONTES ENCINEERSILANOSCAPEARCHITECTS IPIANNERSISURVEYORS 950 Encore Wey Naploc. Florida 31110 Office: (2]9) 254.2000 We0: w.rJ/oM4onl�a.com / wwvll V Eng.cam F106Ma Cr" O/Aulho�irwm Na. 1772 The original name of the proposed PUD was the Immokalee Randall ImJL mokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict. To avoid confusion with similarly named PUDs and Subdistricts, :PUD; and the GMP Subdistrict was the the names were changed at the request of County staff, to the GMA CPUD and the GMA Commercial Subdistrict. The names were not updated on the supporting application materials and exhib 1tS, as the name change has no material effect on these documents or exhibits, only on the documents that will be included in the recorded ordinances: the Proposed GMPA Amendment Language, Master Plan, and CPUD Document. e�r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GR0INTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercauntvfl.�ov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 �239} 252-2400 Pre -Application M�etin� Notes PUD Rezone (PUDZ)& Companion Petition Type: GMP Amendment (GMPA) Date and Time: Wednesday 3 / 15 / 2 3 at_ 1 : 3 0 PM Laura DeJohn - PUDZ Assigned Planner: Kathy Eastley - GMPA Engineering Manager {for PPL's and FP's): Project Information Randall Blvd - Immokalee Road (PUDZ) Project Name: Randall Blvd-Immokalee Road Subdistrict (GMPA) 20230002458 (PUDZ) PL#: 20230002460 (GMPA) 37742880001, Property ID #: 37'744000009 Current Zoning: Estates (E) 13 0 62 Irrlmokalee R ad Naples FL 3 41_ 2 0 Project Address: City: State: Zip: Applicant: Hole Montes, Inc . - Stephanie Karol Agent Name: Bob Mulhere, President Phone: Agent/Firm Address: 950 Encore Wa 239-2��4-2018 City: Naples State: FZ Zip; 34110 Property Owner: GM Advisors LLC & Collier Cnty Transportation Right-of-way Please provide the following, if applicable: i. Total Acreage: 10 . 4 4 ii. Proposed # of Residential Units: iii. Proposed Commercial Square Footage: iv. For Amendments, indicate the original petition number: v. If there is an Ordinance or Resolution associated with this project, please indicate the type and number: vi. If the project is within a Plat, provide the name and AR#/PL#: Updated 1/12/2021 Page (1 of 5 CoL� Lie��unty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercountyfl.�ov Meeting Notes 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE MAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 �239) 252-2400 As of 10/16/2017 all Zoning applications have revised applications, and your associated Application is included in your notes; additionally a *new Property Ownership Disclosure Form is required far all applications. A copy of this new form is included in your pre-app Nate —link is httgs://v�rww.colliercountvfl.Qov/Home/ShowDocument?id=75093 �Zo ry � ry � r �� n r�- .� �vh n> -- �¢�a-- �-��t�o n Q �u �-��� r✓v,7"� /V D T�� �o.� P �L�,N6 - �a7�w E,�s czar - 5�.� .�ir,�h.�a N��-.�s �,� �►� 0�. -, _ Lc C..� L �' � .a.,S - to �v � �-- �� � r�- .�- C'a�'T"�-�T` �o c� _�. L.► � �� v S --- .LSTt o � S �' l�.tl�� �+c.w C°v•v6 h-�.7-" / lv F� a N 7'r�-cr �'ry �o �� per ��e�. S -- G � w d �'�9-w7-/i/�>��c,,a L�r-s..� C:�.c.�--r�. Zr w� �, If Site is within the City of Naples Water Service Area please send to Naples Utilities and Planning Departments. Then, if the petition is submitted, we are to send it (by email) to the four persons below in their Utilities and Planning Depts. -along with a request that they send us a letter or email of "no objection" to the petition. Bob Middleton RMidd(eton(a�naplesgov.com Allyson Holland AMHolland(c�naplesgov.com Robin Singer RSinger(a�naplesgov.com Erica Martin emar�tin(c�naplesgov.com , Disclaimer: Information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may ��ot fully inform tf�e applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LDC dictates tine regu;ations which a!1 applications must satisfy. Any cf�ecklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required dafa. Updated 1/12/2021 Page � 2 of 5 ThomaSUarkevEN From: LauraDeJOhnVEN Sent: Monday, March 27, 2023 7:25 AM To: ThomasClarkeVEN Subject: RE: Pre Application Meeting notes PL20230002458 - Randall Blvd - Immokalee Rd (PUDZ) Attachments: Checklist for PUDZ PUDA PUDR Application.pdf Thomas, I attached an outdated checklist form —please use the version attached. Thanks! From: LauraDeJohnVEN Sent: Monday, March 27, 2023 7:24 AM To: ThomasClarkeVEN <Thomas.Clarke@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Pre Application Meeting notes PL20230002458 - Randall Blvd - Immokalee Rd (PUDZ) Thomas, Attached is the PUDZ checklist. (The applicant submitted as a PUDR but this is a PUDZ) Here are zoning pre app notes for the referenced March 15 Pre app: to) tvjlp� / V 1W Site is zoned E-ST/W-3 and ST/W-4 Petitioner proposes rezone to CPUD for total of 125,000 square feet of C-3 uses including indoor air-conditioned self storage with companion GMPA (PL20230002460) Petitioner is in process of executing an agreement with Collier County to complete a land swap to relocate water management area from Parcel No. 37742880001 (Lot 36) to Parcel No. 37743960001 (Lot 52) with necessary conveyance easements. • Provide a copy of the agreement with submittal • Rezoning requires narratives explaining how the request meets applicable GMP policies and Rezone and PUD criteria per the LDC. Include analysis comparing proposed development standards and intensity with the development standards and intensities that apply in the surrounding areas to demonstrate compatibility and consistency with the existing land use pattern. • To address compatibility within the PUD, identify the specific uses allowed with C-3 that are anticipated on the site as permitted uses. • A PUD Master Plan is required, including contents outlined in the Administrative Code, section G.1. • If deviations from Admin Code or LDC requirements are proposed, provide justifications demonstrating such master plan elements may be waived without detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community (LDC section 10.02.13.A.3), and/or demonstrating that the deviation is "justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations" per 10.02.13.B.5.h. • Petitioner must conduct a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) prior to scheduling of public hearings before the Planning Commission & Board of County Commissioners. • In the application form where civic associations must be listed, and for purposes of NIM mailings, include Golden Gate Estates Civic Association Laura DeJohn, AICP Collier County Growth Management Department Zoning Services (Vendor) 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Desk: (239) 252-5587 aura.de1ohn@col1ieicou�ztvfl.�ov . Comprehensive Planning Pre-App Notes Randall Blvd/Immokalee Rd Subdistrict GMPA P L20230002460 —Kathy Eastley PUDZ PL20230002458 — Laura DeJohn Description: March 15, 2023 - 1:30 p.m. The applicant proposes to create a 10.44 acre subdistrict in the Golden Gate Area Master Plan to aHow 125,000 square feet of C-3 uses, some of which may include self -storage. The district is proposed to include three properties that front on Immokalee Rd west of the Randall Blvd intersection and the Corkscrew Canal. One of the properties is currently owned by Collier County and is under an agreement for trade or swap. The existing zoning is Estates (E), and the properties are currently vacant. The subject site has a Future Land Use designation of Estates, Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP), Rural Estates Sub -Element, Estates Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict. The Rural Estates Sub -element describes this area as appropriate for single-family residential development at a maximum density of one unit per 2.25 gross acres or legal non -conforming lot of record. Growth Management Plan Amendments require the applicant to consistency with the following policies: address and demonstrate • Please provide a needs analysis for the commercial square footage and mini -storage proposed, as well as an analysis of why this location is appropriate for the requested uses. Demonstrate the availability, or lack thereof, of existing properties that could meet the zoning allowances without the need for a GMPA. Include a narrative justifying the market area utilized for the study. The County has recently approved several GGAMP subdistricts and rezones in the immediate vicinity with commercial and residential entitlements. • The Randall Blvd/Immokalee Road Planning Study included these properties. The study results encourage mixed use rather than straight commercial uses. Please include an analysis of the proposal based upon this study. • Policy 5.6 states that "New development shall be compatible with, and complimentary to, the surrounding land uses..." Given the Residential Estates designation the applicant must demonstrate how this use is compatible/complimentary with the surrounding uses, particularly the residential uses to the south and west. o Please consider enhanced buffering as well as the standard 75-foot buffer requirement, of which no less than 50-feet must be retained native vegetation. o Provide information regarding mitigation measures proposed to minimize impacts from lighting, noise, glare, and odors associated with the commercial uses. o Provide line of sight renderings for all directions, particularly for abutting residential areas. Comprehensive Planning Pre-App Notes Randall Blvd/Immokalee Rd Subdistrict March 15, 2023 - 1:30 p.m. • Include discussion on how, if applicable, the development complies with GMPA Policies 7.1- 7.4. The Planning Study focused creating destinations that create a sense of place and the desire for pedestrian and bicycle interconnections in the study area. • List and address applicable provisions of Florida Statues 163.3187 and 163.3177 for amending the Growth Management Plan (GMP). A companion application proposed to rezone the site from Estates to PUD. General Information • Public Notice requirements in Subsection 10.03.06.E o Staff suggests communicating with neighbors regarding the proposal. • One neighborhood information meeting (NIM) is required at least 15 days prior to the advertised Planning Commission Hearing. o GMPA and PUDR can be combined in one NIM • Public Hearings o EAC, if required 0 one CCPC o Final Decision BCC following recommendations from EAC and CCPC ■ The PUDR petition decision pending decision for GIVIPA Contact information Kathy Eastley 239-252-2834 katherine.eastlevC�colliercountyfl.�ov ThomasuarkevItN From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: EastleyKatherine Wednesday, March 15, 2023 2:13 PM ThomasClarkeVEN SaboJames; LauraDeJohnVEN PL20230002460 GMPA Pre-app Notes PL20230002460 Randall-Immokalee Subdistric t GMPA Preapp notes.docx Good afternoon, Attached are notes for the GMPA portion of the pre -application meeting that was held this afternoon. Thank you, Kathy Eastley, AICP Planner II Comprehensive Planning CO er bounty Zoning Division Kathen ne. Eastley�a�col I iercou ntyfl. gov 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL 34101 Direct Phone: 239.252.2834 Under Florida Law, e-rnail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do i�ot send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Information contained in this email is subject to verification by the Zoning Manager and/or Planning Director; if this information is being used as a basis for the purchase/lease of a property or as a guide for the design of a project, it is recommended that a Zoning Verificatior� Letter or Zoning Certificate Application is submitted to zoning services. Applications for a Zoning Verification Letter can be found here: https://www.colliercountvfl.Rov/home/showdocument?id=69624 Zoning Certificate applications can be found here: https: www.colliercount) I.gov/your-government/divisions-f- r/operations-regulatory-management/zoning-or-land-use-application/zoning-other-land-use-applications . COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.coll iercountyfl.�ov 1 Meeting Notes 2$00 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE MAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 �239) 252-2400 �� w s �O ti�q.�' iy ti � - 1 � �� '�..y %�- i�,J��Q�t/ r ��-G /¢ �i�' �i i�? b �/� �'/ L Iy U � e S �ti� � P/3 Nc3"� � �.� s . Q ' V � �N ru �¢ �c.T � C... C�L�1 G w� Cam-- �¢-7l"��-G�, �J �rt� r�i t... � :� � � N � w� � �%'�-Ci� �Nt �y� � �y i /�-�, its � . C . �, � . C . � � Pam-- -- ,� `�.�,,� (J��Tv�, -- C o wZ'�-ter' l�c�t T� ��,�. �cs i �o w '� ,_ �-� ��� � Other required documentation for submittal knot listed on application): Disclaimer: Information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required data. Updated 1/12/2021 Page (3 of 5 i nomaSUarkevEN From: Sent: Subject: Thomas and Laura, SawyerMichael Wednesday, March 15, 2023 10:39 AM ThomasClarkeVEN; LauraDeJohnVEN Randall Blvd and Immokalee Pre App Please provide the following notes to the agent regarding the self -storage use requests, and check the applicable boxes for TIS and methodology. Transportation Planning: Methodology meeting by ZOOM, please request a meeting by email when your team is ready; we recommend having both transportation and planning members attend. The meeting fee needs to be noted on the TIS cover sheet to be collected at the time of GMPA and PUD submittal. Due to the project location, additional county transportation staff members will need to attend the Methodology to address current roadway improvements in this area, access, current parcel ownership/land swap process, and comments that may occur as part of the discussion. Address all transportation elements of the GMP. Provide both ITE and SIC use codes in the TIS. Provide trip limit based on TIS using standard language: "The maximum total daily trip generation for the PUD shall not exceed two-way PM peak hour net trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval." Also, provide interconnection commitment using standard language. Respectfully, Michael �a�ti;�ei� Project Manager II Transportation Management Services Department Transpol-tation Planning 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Suite 103 Naples, Florida 34104 239-252-2926 michael.sawve collercou»tyfl.Qov Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 Transportation Planning and PUD Monitoring Pre-App Notes Developer Commitments: Transportation Planning " The maximum total daily trip generation for the PUD shall not exceed two-way PM peak hour net trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SOFA or subdivision plat approval." Use Codes Provide both ITE and SIC use codes in the TIS. PUD Monitoring "One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close- out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this CPUD approval, the Managing Entity is the Insert Company Name Here. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and coznmittnents to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the CPUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed -out, then the Managing Entity is no Longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments." Miscellaneous "Pursuant to Section 125.022(5) F.S., issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement development." of the ThomasClarkeVEN From: Beard Laurie Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2023 1:54 PM To: ThomasClarkeVEN Subject: Pre -Application Meeting PL20230002458 -Randall Blvd - Immokalee Road (PUDR) Attachments: Transportation-PUD monitoring pre app handout 2020.docx PUD Monitoring pre-app notes attached. Laurie Beard Project Manager Please note new address: PUD Monitoring, GMD 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Laurie. BeardC�CollierCou Phone: (239)-252-5782 �t� �.,�► 1►'�'PRDUDLY SEEMI��'J V�'C4LLIsR� NTY'V FL.aov Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. if you do not �Nar�t your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic ►mail to this entity. instead, contact this ofi�ice by telephone or in ���riting. M� ThomasClarkeVEN From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: BrownCraig Wednesday, March 15, 2023 2:01 PM ThomasClarkeVEN P�� z--. RE: Zoning Pre-App Meeting for Randall Blvd - Immokalee Road GP-.4�� PL20230002458 & Randall Blvd-�n�c�k lee Road Subdistrict(GMPA) - PL2023000Z460 PUDZ-checklist FOR REVIEWERS 2-2017.doc; Environmental data Checklist updated December 2016.doc Thomas here are my note for this one Thanks. l . Please provide a current Listed species survey, which should include listed plants for the subject property. Provide supporting exhibits (i.e. Panther zones ect.) be sure to include Black Bear and Florida Bonneted Batas part of the evaluation. Provide a wildlife survey for the nests of bald eagle and for listed species known to inhabit biological communities similar to those existing on site. The survey shall be conducted in accordance with the guidelines or recommendations of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Provide a survey for listed plants identified in 3.04.03. 2. Provide calculations on site plan showing the appropriate acreage of native vegetation to be retained, the max. amount and ratios permitted to be created on -site or mitigated off -site. Exclude vegetation located within utility and drainage easements from the preserve calculations (LDC 3.05.07.B-D; 3.05.07.F; 3.05.07.H.1.d-e). (15 % of native vegetation is required for preservation.) Label the Master plan with a note that the preservation is to be addressed off -site and provide the calculation in the packet submitted. 3. Please address how the proposed project is consistent with Conservation Coastal Management Element (CCME) Policy 6.1 and Objective 7.1. THIS needs to be address for both the GMPA/PUD 4. Explain how the project meets or exceeds the native vegetation requirements and minimizes impacts to listed species as required in the CCME. (The preservation requirement is 15% of the native vegetation existing onsite). 5. Indicate how the project design minimizes impacts to listed species. Describe the measures that are proposed as mitigation for impacts to listed species. (If found onsite}. 6. Demonstrate that the design of the proposed stormwater management system and analysis of water quality and quantity impacts fully incorporate the requirements of the Watershed Management regulations of 3.07.00. 7. Please provide brief explanation to address the area of the subject property that has been cleared of vegetation, provide supporting documents( i.e. permits or historic aerials ect). 8. Identify any Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones (WRM-ST) within the project area and provide an analysis for how the project design avoids the most intensive land uses within the most sensitive WRM- STs and will comply with the WRM-ST pursuant to 3.06.00. Include the location of the Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones on the SDP or final plat construction plans. For land use applications such as standard and PUD rezones and CUs, provide a separate site plan or zoning map with the project boundary and Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones identified. Environmental Data Fee: $2500.00 Craig Brawn Environmental Supervisor Development Review Divisi0i� (239) 252-2548. Environmental P Project Name Z-PUDA Checklist (non-RFMU) 1. Is the project is in compliance with the ovel•lays, districts and/or zoning on the subject site and/or the surrounding properties? (CON, ST, PUD, RLSA, RFMU, etc.) (LDC 2.03.05-2.03.08; 4.08.00) Not in CV Library 2. Submit a current aerial photograph (available from the Property Appraiser's office) and clearly delineate the subject site boundary lines. If the site is vegetated, provide FLUCFCS overlay and vegetation inventory identifying upland, wetland and exotic vegetation (Admin. Code Ch. 3 G.1. Application Contents #24). FLUCFCS Overlay -P627 3. Clearly identify the location of all preserves and label each as "Preserve" on all plans. (LDC 3.05.07.H.1). Preserve Label- P546 4. Provide calculations on site plan showing the appropriate acreage of native vegetation to be retained, the max. amount and ratios permitted to be created on -site or mitigated off -site. Exclude vegetation located within utility and drainage easements from the preserve calculations (LDC 3.05.07.B-D; 3.05.07.F; 3.05.07.H.1.d-e). Preserve Calculation - P547 5. Created and retained preserve areas shall meet the minimum width requirements per LDC 3.05.07.H.1.b. Preserve Width - P603 6. Retained preservation areas shall be selected based on the criteria defined in LDC 3.05.07.A.3, include a113 strata, be in the largest contiguous area possible and shall be interconnected within the site and to adjoining off -site preservation areas or wildlife corridors. (LDC 3.05.07.A.1-4) Preserve Selection- P550 7. Principle structures shall be located a minimum of 25' from the boundary of the preserve boundary. No accessory structures and other site alterations, fill placement, grading, plant alteration or removal, or similar activity shall be permitted within 10' of the boundary unless it can be shown that it will not affect the integrity of the preserve (i.e. stem wall or berm around wetland preserve). Provide cross -sections for each preserve boundary identifying all site alterations within 25' . (LDC 3.05.07.H.3; 6.01.02.C.) Preserve Setback —New 8. Wildlife survey required for sites where an E1S is not required, when so warranted. (LDC 10.02.02.A.2. fl Listed Species - P522 9. Provide Environmental Data identifying author• credentials, consistency determination with the GMPs, off -site preserves, seasonal and historic high water levels, and analysis of water quality. For land previously used for farm fields or golf course, provide soil sampling/groundwater monitoring reports identifying any site contamination. (LDC 3.08.00) Environmental Data Required — P 522 10. PUD Document and Master Plan shall state the minimum acreage required to be preserved. (LDC 10.02.13.A.2) Master Plan Contents-P626 11. If the PUD includes a Preserve Tract section UP FOR DISCUSSION —DISCUSS WITH CAO When listing preserve uses, the following is suggested: A. Principal Use: Preserve; B. Accessory Uses: All other uses (list as applicable or refer to the LDC —see 1-3 below as typical uses listed by agents) (ensure the text states "subject to LDC section related to Allowable uses witlritz County required preserves" Alternate format: A. Uses subject to LDC section Allowable uses within County required preserves: l . Nature trails that do not reduce the amount of required preserve. 2. Passive Recreation uses, as per LDC requirements. 3. Stonnwater only when in accordance with the LDC. PUD Commitments and Site Plan notes Where preserves occur adjacent to development off site and will be used in lieu of landscape buffers, include the following condition in the environmental commitments section of the PUD document or master plan: Preserves may be used to satisfy the landscape buffer requirements after exotic vegetation removal in accordance with LDC sections 4.06.02 and 4.06.05.E. L Supplemental plantings with native plant materials shall be in accordance with LDC section 3.05.07. 12. PUD Document shall identify any listed species found on site and/or describe any unique vegetative features that will be preserved on the site. (LDC ] 0.02.13.A.2.) Unique Features- P628 Example: A management plan for the entire project shall be submitted in accordance with the requirements and procedures of the LDC for listed species including but not limited to Black Bear, Gopher Tortoise and listed birds. The management plan shall be submitted prior to development of the first phase of the project. 13. Review cross -sections if provided; they are not required wi Is there any fill proposed in the preserve? Additional Comments: th the PUD. However, sometimes they are provided. Project Name Environmental Data Checklist ZL The Environmental Data requirements can be found in LDC Section 3.08.00 l . P�•ovide the EIS fee if PUD or CU. 2. WHO AND V'VHA,T COMPANY PREPARED THE ENVIRONMENTAL DATA REPORT? Preparation of Environmental Data. Environmental Data Submittal Requirements shall be prepared by an individual with academic credentials and experience in the area of environmental sciences or natural resource management. Academic credentials and experience shall be a bachelor's or higher degree in one of the biological sciences with at least two years of ecological or biological professional experience in the State of Florida. Please include revision dates on resubmittals. 3. Identify on a current aerial, the location and acreage of all SFWMD jurisdictional wetlands accol-ding to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS) and include this information on the SDP or final plat construction plans. Wetlands must be verified by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) or Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) prior to SDP or final plat construction plans approval. For sites in the RFMU district, provide an assessment in accordance with 3.05.07 F and identify on the FLUCFCS map the location of all high quality wetlands (wetlands having functionality scores of at least 0.65 WRAP or 0.7 UMAM) and their location within the proposed development plan. Sites with high quality wetlands must have their functionality scores verified by the SFWMD or DEP prior to first development order approval. Where functionality scores have not been verified by either the SFWMD or DEP, scores must be reviewed and accepted by County staff, consistent with State regulation. 4. SDP o1- final plat construction plans with impacts to five (5) or more acres of wetlands shall provide an analysis of potential water quality impacts of the project by evaluating water quality loadings expected from the project (post development conditions considering the proposed land uses and stormwater management controls) compared with water quality loadings of the project area as it exists in its pre -development conditions. The analysis shall be performed using methodologies approved by Federal and State water quality agencies, and must demonstrate no increase in nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorous) loadings in the post development scenario. 5. Where treated stormwater is allowed to be directed into preserves, show how the criteria in 3.05.07 H have been met. 6. Where native vegetation is retained on site, provide a topographic map to a half foot and, where possible, provide elevations within each of the FLUCFCS Codes identified on site. For SDP or final plat construction plans, include this information on the site plans. 7. Provide a wildlife survey for the nests of bald eagle and for listed species known to inhabit biological communities similar to those existing on site. The survey shall be conducted in accordance with the guidelines or recommendations of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Survey times may be reduced or waived where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low, as determined by the FFWCC and USFWS. Where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low, the survey time may be reduced or waived by the County Manager or designee, when the project is not reviewed or technical assistance not provided by the FFWCC and USFWS. Additional survey time may be required if listed species are discovered 8. Provide a survey for listed plants identified in 3.04.03 9. Wildlife habitat management and monitoring plans in accordance with 3.04.00 shall be required where listed species are utilizing the site or where wildlife habitat management and monitoring plans are required by the FFWCC or USFWS. These plans shall describe now the project directs incompatible land uses away from listed species and their habitats. Identify the location of listed species nests, burrows, dens, foraging areas, and the ,r�� te� 3. �• �, location of any bald eagle nests or nest protection zones on the native vegetation aerial with FLUCFCS overlay for the site. Wildlife habitat management plans shall be included on the SDP or final plat construction plans. Bald eagle management plans are required for sites containing bald eagle nests or nest protection zones, copies of which shall be included on the SDP or final plat construction plans. 10. For sites or portions of sites cleared of native vegetation or in agricultural Meratio provide documentation that the parcels) were issued a permit to be cleared and are in compliance with the 25 year rezone limitation pursuant to section 10.02.06. For sites permitted to be cleared prior to July 2003, provide documentation that the parcels) are in compliance with the 10 year rezone limitation previously identified in the GMP. Criteria defining native vegetation and determining the legality, process and criteria for clearing are found in 3.05.05, 3.05.07 and 100020060 11. Identify on a current aerial the acreage, location and community types of all upland and wetland habitats on the project site, according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS), and provide a legend for each of the FLUCFCS Codes identified. Aerials and overlay information must be legible at the scale provided. Provide calculations for the acreage of native vegetation required to be retained on -site. Include the above referenced calculations and aerials on the SDP or final plat construction plans. In a separate report, demonstrate how the preserve selection criteria pursuant to 3.05.07 have been met. Where applicable, include in this report an aerial showing the project boundaries along with any undeveloped land, preserves, natural flowways or other natural land features, located on abutting properties. 12. Include on a separate site plan, the project boundary and the land use designations and overlays for the RLSA, RFMU, ST and ACSC-ST districts. Include this information on the SDP or final plat construction plans. 13. Where off -site preservation of native vegetation is proposed in lieu of on -site, demonstrate that the criteria in section 3.05.07 have been met and provide a note on the SDP or final plat construction plans indicating the type ion) identified to satisfy the requirement. Include on the SDP or of donation (monetary payment or land donat final plat construction plans, a location map(s) and property identification number(s) of the off -site parcel(s) if off -site donation of land is to occur. 14. Provide the results of any Environmental Assessments and/or Audits of the property, along with a narrative of the measures needed to remediate if required by FDEP. 15. Soil and/or ground water sampling shall be required at the time of first development order submittal for sites that occupy farm fields (crop fields, cattle dipping ponds, chemical mixing areas), golf courses, landfill or junkyards or for sites where hazardous products exceeding 250 gallons of liquid or 1,000 pounds of solids were stored or processed or where hazardous wastes in excess of 220 pounds per month or 110 gallons at any point in time were generated or stored. The amount of sampling and testing shall be determined by a registered professional with experience in the field of Environmental Site Assessment and shall at a minimum test for organochlorine pesticides (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 8081) and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) 8 metals using Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) soil sampling Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) FS 3000, in areas suspected of being used for mixing and at discharge point of water if no points of contamination are obvious. Include a management system. Sampling should occur randomly background soil analysis from an undeveloped location hydraulically upgradient of the potentially contaminated site. Soil sampling should occur just below the root zone, about 6 to 12 inches below ground surface or as otherwise agreed upon with the registered professional with experience in the field of Environmental Site Assessment. Include in or with the Environmental Site Assessment, the acceptable State and Federal pollutant levels for the types of contamination found on site and indicate in the Assessment, when the contaminants are over these levels. If this analysis has been done as part of an Environmental Audit then the report shall be submitted. The County shall coordinate with the FDEP where contamination exceeding applicable FDEP standards is identified on site or where an Environmental Audit or Environmental Assessment has been submitted. 16. Shoreline development must provide an analysis demonstrating that the project will remain fully functional for its intended use after asix-inch rise in sea level. 17. Provide justification for deviations from e�ivironmental LDC provisions pursuant to GMP COME Policy 6.1.1 (13), if requested. 18. Where applicable, provide evidence of the issuance of all applicable federal aYld/or state oil and gas permits for proposed oil and gas activities in Collier County. Include all state permits that comply with the requirements of Chapter 62C-25 through 62C-3 0, F.A.C., as those rules existed on January 13, 2005. 19. Identify any Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones (WRM-ST) withili the project area and provide an analysis fol• how the project design avoids the most intensive land uses within the most sensitive WRM-STs and will comply with the WRM-ST pursuant to 3.06.00. Include t11e location of the Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones on the SDP or final plat constl•uction plans. For land use applications such as standard and PUD rezones and CUs, provide a separate site plan or zoning map with the project boundary and Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones identified. 20. Demonstrate that the design of the proposed stormwater management system and analysis of water quality and quantity impacts fully incorporate the requireme�its of the Watershed Management regulations of 3.07.00. 21. For sites located in the Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern -Special Treatment overlay district (ACSC- ST), show how the project is consistent with the development standards and regulations in 4.02.14. 22. For multi -slip docking facilities with ten slips or more, and for all ma1•ina facilities, show how the project is consistent with 5.05.02. Refer to the Manatee Protection Plan for site specific requirements of the Manatee Protection Plan not included in 5.05.02. 23. For development orders within RFMU sending lands, show how the project is consistent with each of the applicable Objectives and Policies of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the GMP. 24. The County Manager or designee may require additional data or information necessary to evaluate the project's compliance with LDC and GMP requirements. (LDC 10.02.02.A3 fl The following to be determined at preapplication meeting: (Choose those that apply) a. Provide overall description of project with respect to environmental and water management issues. b. Explain how project is consistent with each of the applicable objectives and policies in the CCME of t11e GMP. c. Explain how the project meets or exceeds the native vegetation preservation requirement in the CCME and LDC. d. Indicate wetlands to be impacted and the effects of the impact to their functions and haw the project's design compensates for wetland unpacts. e. Indicate how the project design minimizes impacts to listed species. Describe the measures that are proposed as mitigation for impacts to listed species. 25. PUD zoning and CU petitions. For PUD rezones and CU petitions, applicants shall collate and package applicable Environmental Data Submittal Requirements into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) document, prior to public hearings and after all applicable staff reviews are complete. Copies of the EIS shall be provided to the County Manager or designee prior to public hearings. 26. Is EAC Review (by CCPC) required? 27. PUD master plan or PPL/SDP site plan notes: Where preserves occur adjacent to development off site and will be used in lieu of landscape buffers, include the following condition in the environmental commitments section of the PUD document. Preserves may be used to satisfy the landscape buffer reguiremts after exotic vegetatio�i removal in accordance with LDC sections 4.06.02 and 4.06.05.E.1. Supplemental plantings with native plant materials shall be in accordance with LDC section 3.05.07. 28. Additional comments 29. Stipulations for approval (Conditions) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercountvfl.gov llr er County _.. 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORI DA 34104 (239) 252-2400 Zoning Pre-Ap�alicatic�n meeting Sign -In Sheet PL# 20230002458 (PUDZ) 202300024 60 �( Collier County Contact Information: GMPA Name Review Discipline Phone Email ❑ ❑ John Kelly Zoning Senior Planner 252-5719 john.kelly@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Richard Henderlong Zoning -Planner III 252-2464 richard.henderlong@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Ray Bellows Zoning &Planning Manager 252-2463 raymond.bellows@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Mike Bosi Zoning &Planning Director 252-1061 Michael.Bosi@colliercountyfl.gov Nancy Gundlach, AICP Zoning —Planner Ill 252-2484 nancy.gundlach@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Eric Ortman Zoning —Planner III 252-1032 Eric.Ortman@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Sean Sammon Zoning —Planner III 252-8422 Sean.sammon@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Tim Finn, AICP Zoning -Planner III 252-4312 timothy.finn@colliercountyfl.gov Thomas Clarke Zoning -Operations Analyst 252-2584 Thomas.clarke@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Anthony Stoltz Utility Planning -Supervisor 252-5835 Anthony.stoltz@colliercountyfl.gov Drew Cody Utility Planning —Project Mgr III 252-2917 Drew.cody@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Brandi Pollard Utility Impact fees 252-6237 brandi.pollard@colliercountyfl.gov L�� Shon Fandrich Utilities -Project Mgt -Supervisor 252-8835 Shon.fandrich@colliercountyfl.gov U Steve Baluch Transportation Planning 252-2361 Stephen.baluch@colliercountyfl.gov �� Michael Sawyer Transportation Planning 252-2926 michael.sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov Michael Gibbons Structural/Residential Plan Review 252-2426 michael.gibbons@colliercountyfl.gov ��`� Richard Orth Stormwater Planning 252-5092 richard.orth@colliercountyfl.gov � Alicia Humphries Right-Of-'JVay Permitting 252-2326 alicia.humphries@colliercountyfl.gov I�Laurie Beard PUD Monitoring -Project Mgr II 252-5782 laurie.beard@colliercountyfl.gov �� Sean Lintz North Collier Fire-Batallion Chief 597-9227 Blintz@northcollierfire.com �_� Maggie Acevedo North Collier Fire 252-2309 macevedo@northcollierfire.com I�! Daniel Zunzunegui North Collier Fire 252-2310 Daniel.Zunzunegui@colliercountyfl.gov � -� Linda Simmons North Collier Fire 252-2311 Linda.Simmons@colliercountyfl.gov �_l Shar A.Beddow MSM/Deputy Fire Marshal - Greater Naples Fire 241-1422 sbeddow@gnfire.org Heidi Ashton Cicko Managing Asst. County Attorney 252-8773 heidi.ashton@colliercountyfl.gov C_ Diane Lynch Management Analyst I 252-4283 diane.lynch@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Mark Templeton Landscape Review 252-2475 mark.templeton@colliercountyfl.gov �___� Gino Santabarbara Impact Fees —Planner III 252-2925 Gino.santabarbara@colliercountyfl.gov Updated 03/14/2023 Page � 4 of 5 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www. co I l i e rco u ntyf I .�ov Co[l�ie-� County 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORI DA 34104 �239} 252-2400 =i Thomas Mastroberto Greater Naples Fire —Site Plans Reviewer III 252-7348 thomas.mastroberto@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Sue Faulkner GMP-Comp Planning -Planner III 252-5715 sue.faulkner@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Parker Klopf GMP—Comp Planning — Plannerll 252-2471 Parker.klopf@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Rachel Hansen GMP—Comp Planning —Planner III 252-1142 Rachel.hansen@colliercountyfl.gov Kathy Eastley GMP-Comp Planning -Planner III 252-2834 Kathy Eastley@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ James Sabo, AICP GMP, Comp Planning Manager 252-2708 james.sabo@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Alexandra Mitchel Environmental Specialist 252-2907 Alexandra.Mitchel@colliercountyfl.gov (❑ David Roe Environmental Specialist 252-2915 David.Roe@colliercountyfl.gov �d Craig Brown Environmental Review Supervisor 252-2548 craig.brown@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Sarah Harrington Environmental Review Manager 252-4211 Sarah.Harrington@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ John Houldsworth Engineering Subdivision 252-5757 John.houldsworth@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jocelyn Nageon De Lestang, P.E. Engineering Stormwater 252-2434 Jocelyn.NageondeLestang@colliercountyfl.gov Jack McKenna, P.E. Engineering Services 252-2911 jack.mckenna@colliercountyfl.gov Matt McLean, P.E. Division Director - IF, CPP & PM 252-8279 matthew.mclean@colliercountyfl.gov Cormac Giblin, AICP Director— Econ. Dev. &Housing 252-2460 Cormac.giblin@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jamie Cook Development Review Director 252-6290 Jaime.cook@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Christine Willoughby Development Review -Zoning 252-5748 Christine.willoughby@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Brett Rosenblum-P.E Dev. Review -Supervisor Proj. Mgt 252-2905 brett.rosenblum@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Michele Mosca, AICP Community Develop. —Planner III 252-2466 michele.mosca@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Connie Thomas Client Services Supervisor 252-6369 Consuela.thomas@colliercountyfl.gov Renald Paul Client Services 252-2443 Renald.paul@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Lisa Blacklidge Building Review 252-2758 Lisa.blacklidge@colliercountyfl.gov Derek Perry Assistant County Attorney 252-8066 Derek.perry@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Peter Shawinsky Architectural Review 252-8523 peter.shawinsky@colliercountyfl.gov Additional Attendee Contact Information: Name Representing Phone Email rk u t h �.�, ..� oC � T ��S Z 3 � s"� - � b r �,,� �l�v rt� -c.�.1� e `— Updated 03/14/2023 Page � 5 of 5 Randall Bivd-Immokalee Rd.(PUDR) PL20230002458 & GMPA) PL20230002460 — Zoom March 15, 1:30PM �=�., F i r� �l L� E � � r-ti r i l � a rat TC MS DC thC�r11�S r(�rk� i;H��t, t���si Ell�ri �un�m�r�, P•.•ii�h�l Saa�l�h E'�c� l � � r-t P•��1 r.r l l � � r-� �L r� i � E r-c� �,�•, r� Lour aC?� Ir�(�r�••a'Er4�! ^r����J F'���r- C� � r� �: C--�. F� � rr•. �_ �� �_I r�t-�,� ^.ttc� r-r� e ����' � ��f i r� 1� ��r�r��i►� ��h��t�ir� K�th�rir��.E � ;t[�..� r�J �� rr�� � r� Try F� i (� c� r {� ���r-ah,H�rrin�tc�r� :�. ��� �=r: «: ��� �=r: i�r: MS DC thC�r11�S r(�rk� i;H��t, t���si Ell�ri �un�m�r�, P•.•ii�h�l Saa�l�h E'�c� l � � r-t P•��1 r.r l l � � r-� �L r� i � E r-c� �,�•, r� Lour aC?� Ir�(�r�••a'Er4�! ^r����J F'���r- C� � r� �: C--�. F� � rr•. �_ �� �_I r�t-�,� ^.ttc� r-r� e ����' � ��f i r� 1� ��r�r��i►� ��h��t�ir� K�th�rir��.E � ;t[�..� r�J �� rr�� � r� Try F� i (� c� r {� ���r-ah,H�rrin�tc�r� :�. ��� �=r: «: ��� �=r: i�r: . �. Applicant/Agent may also send site plans or conceptual plans for review in advance if desired. Planner -Laura DeJohn PL20230002460 —Randall Blvd.-Immokalee Rd. Subdistrict (GMPA� Planner -Kathy Eastle Assigned Ops Staff: Thomas Clarke STAFF FORM FOR SUPPLEMENTAL PRE -APPLICATION MEETING INFORMATION • Name and Number of who submitted pre-app request Stephanie Karol —Hole Montes, Inc. 239-254-2018 stephaniekarol� hmen�.com • Agent to list for PL# gob Mulhere, President— HOIe Montes, Inc. • Owner of property fall owners for all parcels) - GM Advisors LLC - Collier Cnty Transportation Right-of-way Confirm Purpose of Pre-App: This is a PUD Rezone (PUDR) to rezone approx. 10.44 acres from E states (E) to CPUD to permit a maximum 125,000 square feet of C-3 uses and indoor air-conditioned self - storage. A companion SSGMPA to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan is proposed to allow for the commercial uses. Please list the density request of the project if applicable and number of homes/units/offices/docks tany that aPplY Details about Project: See Above REQUIRED Supplemental Information provided by: Name: Title: Email: Phone: Cancellation/Reschedule Requests: Contact Connie Thomas- Supervisor —Permitting Consuela.tholmas@colliercountyfl.gov -Phone: 239-252-2473 Created April 5, 2017 Location: K:\CDES Planning Services\Current\Zoning Staff Information Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1036 � Email: GMDClientservices@colliercountyfl.gov www.col liercountyfl.gov Final Submittal Requirement Checklist far: ❑✓ PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G.1 of the Administrative Cade ❑ Amendment to PUD- Ch. 3 G.2 of the Administrative Code ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone- Ch. � G.1 �f the Administrative Code The following submittal requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with an up-to-date application. Please upload the submittal items with cover sheets attached to each section via the GMD Portal. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted, or processed. View sample PUD document. REQUIREMENTS RE UIRED � NOT REQUIRED Cover Letter with narrative statement including a detailed description of why amendment is necessary Completed application with required attachments (download latest version) ✓ I Pre -application meeting notes � Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized ✓ Property Ownership Disclosure Form I ✓ Notarized and completed Covenant of Unified Control ✓ I Completed Addressing Checklist ✓ I Warranty Deeds) ✓ List identifying owner and all parties of corporation ✓ Signed and sealed Boundary Survey ✓ Architectural rendering of proposed structures ✓ Current aerial photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. � ❑ Statement of utility provisions ✓ Environmental data requirements pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact Statement LEIS) packet at time of public hearings. Coordinate with project planner at time of public hearings. � ❑ Listed or protected species survey, less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys. �-� L�J ❑ Traffic Impact Study (TIS) �s; �GG�¢e.%e � �iT P�G,t�T1d S�.c�3��-TA��.. '� Historical Survey ✓ School Impact Analysis Application, if applicable ✓ Electronic copy of all required documents ✓ Completed Exhibits A-F (see below for additional information)+ ✓ List of requested deviations from the LDC with justification for each (this document is separate from Exhibit E) � ❑ ❑ *Checklist continues on next page 07/2022 Page 9 of 11 Go -�e� County .� �`�-. tom` �' ;��"w'`-.�_,s-�.:�- r= t�;.y.V Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1036 � Email: GMDCIientServices@colliercountyfl.gov www.col I i ercou ntyfl.gov Revised Conceptual Master Site Plan 24" x 36"and one (1) 8 %" x 11" copy ✓ Original PUD document/ordinance, and Master Plan 24" x 36" —Only if Amending � the PUD ❑ ❑ Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru &underlined ✓ Copy of Official Interpretation and/or Zoning Verification � L✓ +The following exhibits are to be completed on a separate document and attached to the application packet: • Exhibit A: List of Permitted Uses • Exhibit B: Development Standards • Exhibit C: Master Plan- See Chapter 3 G.1 of the Administrative Code • Exhibit D: Legal Description • Exhibit E: List of Requested LDC Deviations and justification for each • Exhibit F: List of Development Commitments If located in RFMU Rural Fringe Mixed Use Receivin Land Areas Pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08.A.2.a.2.(b.)i.c., the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239-690-3500 for information regarding "Wildfire Mitigation &Prevention Plan." PLANNERS —INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: ❑ School District (Residential Components) Conservancy of SWFL ❑ ✓ Utilities Engineering Parks and Recreatiol�Director Emergency Management Immokalee Water/Sewer District Other: City of Naples Planning Director Other: City of Naples Utilities FEE REQUIREMENTS ❑✓ Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 ❑✓ PUD Rezone: $10,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone: $8,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre ❑ PUD Amendment: $6,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre Comprehensive Planning ❑ Consistency Review: $2,250.00 ---� Sa.A G��� F�&� ��-ZvZ3 -1'�6n Environmental Data Requirements -EIS Packet (submittal determined at pre -application meeting): $2,500.00 � ] Listed or Protected Species Review (when an EIS is not required): $1,000.00 Cl - �,w,� � �►�;L (sue ,���-�s) Transportation Review Fees._..-� �(t`� 7` � Y • Methodology Review: $500.00 (Methodology by Email to Staff) *Additional fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting. • Minor Study Review: $750.00 • Major Study Review $1,500.00 ❑✓ Fire Planning Review Fee: ($150 PUDZ) ($125 PUDA, PUDR) 07/2022 Page 10 of 11 CoI[ier Couvity ., Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1036 � Email: GMDCIientServices@colliercountyfl.gov www.colliercountyfl.gov [✓ Estimated Legal Advertising fee: CCPC: $1,125.00 • BCC: $500.00 �]✓ If applicable, an additional fee for Property Owner Notifications will be billed to the applicant after Hearing Examiner hearing date. (Variable) School Concurrenc Fee if a licable: Y pp • Mitigation Fees, if application, to be determined by the School District in coordination with the County All fees are collected at the time of application. Property Notification Letters, if required by The Land Development Code, will be invoiced after the petition is heard by the Board of County Commissioners. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, 1 attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. 1 understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. *Additional fee for the 5th and subsequent re -submittal will be accessed at 20°° of the original fee. *The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Community Development Department � GMD Portal: https://cvportal.col liercountyfl.gov/cityviewweb Questions? Email: GMDclientservices@colliercountyfl.gov Signature of Petitioner or Agent Date Printed named of signing party 07/2022 Page 11 of 11 Al I [IPA] I I j, Iv1iCHEL M. SAADEH (print name), as MUM applicable) of cIH ADVISORS, u.c (title, if LL (company, If ap licable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owned applicant contract purchaser and that. 1. I have full aufihority to secure the approvals} requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4-. The , property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. �. Well authorize RCSERTJ, MULHERE, FA1GP, PRESICEO & JEREMIE CHASTAIN, AICP, SR. PLANNER to act as our/mv res re entative in any matters regarding this petition including i through 2 above. `t�otes: If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the core. Ares. or v. pres. ® If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.LeC. ) or Limited Company (L. C.), then the documents should typi Ily be signed by the Company's "Managing Member.' If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. p /f the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be Identified as the eneral partner" of the named partnership. g if the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name a /n each instance, first determine the applicant's status a individual, carp orate, tr�rst artnershi and , p p, then use the appropr7ate format for that ownership. 3TATE OF FLORIDA OUNTY OFCOLLIER Such person(s) Notary Public must check applicable box: re personaNy known to me Has produced a current drivers license Has produced as identification. Notary Signature: and .the words was trustee" Notary Public. State Of � Jo�ida Commissorl.No,, HN 339768 My +�omrnSsion Expies: 211712027 � 1 1' � 1 � 1 1 Wer County Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 2524036 ( Email: GMDClientServices@colliercountyfl.gov i www.collercountyfl.gov GM Advisors,LLC This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: Name and Address % of Ownership N/A b. If the property is owned Lot a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage Of stock owned by each: Name and Address % of Ownership N/A c. If the property is in the percentage of interest: 01/2023 name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the Name and Address % of Ownership N/A Page 1 of 3 d �//I��■.� County Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 2524036 Email: GMDClientServices@colliercountyfl.gov i www.collercountyf I.gov d. If the property is in the name Of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners: Name and Address % of Ownership GM Advisors, LLC 434 Terracina Court, Naples, FL 34119 Michel M. Saadeh, MGR 51 % George Chami, Authorized Member 49% e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners: f. Name and Address % of Ownership N/A Date of Contract: If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, Or trust: Name and Address N/A g. Date subject property acquired 1 /17/20 & 4/30/20 ❑ Leased: Term of lease years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: 01/2023 Page 2 of 3 entDevelopment Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 # - w • Llali Www.collierc* ■ . date Option terminates: or nticipated closing date. ntsforpete on types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whetherIts A LK� dEcepleti without this form. tequirem R Company other mmediately if such change occurs prior to the. petition's final public hearing, be disclosed to Collier County As tfie auth©rued agent,/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the inform�rtian indicated on - �ncluded in this submittal package, I understand that failure to include a this checklist 13 all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. 0 *m . INSTR 6391015 OR 6237 PG 2674 RECORDED 4/18/2023 2:24 PM PAGES 3 CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT AND COMPTROLLER, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA REC $27.00 r�Ts entered into Advisors, LP "Developer") 1 (herein collect' SECOND AMENDMENT TU LAND EXCHANGE �,GREEMENT GNi AD'�ISORS, LLC 1D ,, (hereinafter referred to as the "Amendment") is made and of Aor 1 2023 (the "Effective Date"), by and among GM y Florida firnifted liability company (hereinafter referred to as the :Vier County, Florida, a political subdivision of the State of Florida "County"), each individually referred to as the "Party" and e 'Parties." WHEREAS, the pales e,e 2021 (hereinafter referred to athe,.'i, Page 1878 in the Collier Courity�.c pECITALS: d into a Land Exchange agreement"), a copy of 3 is; and F WHEREAS, the parties dMtrecf ;, Into the • Agreement dated April 2, 2022, a cp - 4hich is Collier County Records; and `. WHEREAS, the parties wish t Agreement as set forth below; and WHEREAS, the Collier County amendment is in the best interest of tr Agreement dated November 9, which is recorded at OR 6045, First Amendment to Land Exchange recorded at OR 6114, Page 3144 in the set forth in paragraph 4 of the oners hereby finds that this �� i i 1tiaA7iJl'.1 i.i NU W 9 THEREFCJRE, in consideration of Ten DolMrs Q.00) and other good and valuable consideration exchanged amongst the parties, and in csid'dration of the covenants contained herein, the parties agree as follows: f:J 1. All of the above RECITALS are true and correct and'�#�P:J��Oaereby expressly :: ncorporated herein by reference as if set faith fully below,:x 2. Paragraph 4 of the Agreement is hereby amended as follows: Schedule. Design ofthe New Improvements s�-1-be has been completed r Vistric-t-Indi'vi , • En-vir, • /Resource ,ermit No., OR 6237 PG 2675 n of the New Improvements shall Comm Ct?1110tA "%0 &0 2024 and sly mutually agreed upon by the patties. Ce h3 rst 28, Z02�t) #tee unless otherwise 3. The ounty Manager may further extend the Agreement by an additional 90 days without the oard approval. Additional extensions of time will require Board approval. 4. Exec � ._as6fidtonditions ressly provided herein, the Agreement remains in full force and effect according to the teecontained therein. If there is a conflict between the terms of this Amendment and:a � eement, the terms of this Amendment shall prevail, k•i ✓. lE IN WITNESS WHE `KbF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their appropriate officials as .t f rtlit-,date first above written, . ;r AS TO COUNTY: I. •• P\L'•t4. A`I`7['EST. - • ,0 , HO RD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS •+Y, Crystal K: ���rkof Courts C' . `° ER COUNTY, FLORIDA 04 B , , y. . rA � t as � ffaij, •nli'S OAr►�f tirn nw11i ,`' 4 , . Elie, As TO DEVEL6 O- Ri�l��hstro, Chairman GM ADVISORS,I Si ed, sealed and delivered By: i e pre ence of: Name: , , /1 Title; Printed Name Signature Printed Name orida limited liability company *** OR 6237 PG 2676 *** STATE OF FLORiDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing ins.xrument was acknowledged before me this "F�c day of ate. 0 - c� t :: �L�-- -, as..�t.,,- of GM Advisors, LLC a Florida limited liabi'�i `cAiIi nul ny who is personally to leIIL VOation. tlip o? Inuo Appr ed as to form and legA rty. ty . �►�nKat• As ' tant County Attot-ney .��� r��i 2Q23, or has produced Notary P�►bl�e' My Commission Expires: Goo i Ul ml I a [oil OR yl I I m Al",.., . a= • . •• . � � �� � ••� � � 1 is � �� FIRS`I' AIV.CEN1iIV.�EN'I' 'I`C� LAND EXCHANGE AGREEMEN'Y' Git� AI3VISOit�, LLC T�CIS AI��IEN�h�IENT (hereinafter referred to as the "�►xnendment") is made and entered rota this ��� of April, 2022 (the "Effective Date" ), by and among C M Advisors, LL,C, a Floricla`��: �'mited liability company (hereinafter referred to as the "Developer") and �- Collier Co ��,.�' -�la �ida, a political subdivision of the State of Florida (hereinafter referred to as "County").e ,.;'� �_.;.��_:���ividually referred to as the "Pa�c`tY" and collectively referred to as the "Parties." .�� ��" :� ��� _ . .:�� '�iTHEREAS, the<:�art��; 2�21 (hereinafter referred,lo, Page 1878 in the Collier C �� n �?VHEREAS, the paxtie Agreement by 9U days as set f WHER,EA�S, the Cal11E this amendment is in the best Nt3W, THEREFCJRE, valuable consideration exchan contained herein, the parties a l . .A.1 I of the ab o expressly incorporated herein by reference R��xTALs: centered into a Land Exchange Agreement dated I�Iovember 9, s the "Agreement"), a copy of which is recorded at OR. d4�5, t forth in paragraph 4 of the issianers hereby finds that (10.00) and other good and �nsideration of the covenants correct and are ,,> full,.- - �%i��. 2. Paragraph � ofthe Agreement is hereby amende�:-����'� I�o�s: ,, ,. t '� �; ,; Schedule. Design of the New Improvements shall be co�r� .: ` �,�;`�`�- o later than :� nine 9 ��; {� months firom the Effective Date unless ote':';.�:�, mutually ...� agreed upon by the parties. Permitting of the New Improvern.�h_� _.hall be corn leted no later than � fteen 15� ��� � � ' p �.. a-�� months frorr�,;"E"�fectxve Date unless otherwise mutually agreed upon by the parties. Construction of the New Improvements shall be completed no later than two (2) years and three (3} months from the Effective Date, unless otherwise mutually agreed upon by the parties. as if set faith hereby 3. The County Ir/Ianager may f�.irther ea�tend the Agreement by an additional 90 days without the need of Board approval.. Additional extensions of time will require Board approval. 4. Except as expressly provided herein, the Agreement remains in full force and effect according to the terms and conditions contained therein. If there is a conflict between the terms of this 1��xnendxnent and the Agreement, the terms of this �!►mendment shall prevail. k* OR 6114 PG 3145 *** IN WiTl`JESS WEIZEQ', the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their appropriate officials, as of the date first above Written. ` I�inzel, Clerk of Courts �.�`f 4L. "A40 prpro Veto 416 . te - Me." 'r6 :: . fee ft At .� Jeffrey oW, COunt�?". AS TQ DEVELQPER.: liability pr Signed, sealed and deli�rered in tl�e esence of: Printed Name Signature Printed Name BQA�D QF CQL�NTY CQMIV�ISS�QNER.S CQLLIEI�. CO By n C� Willi��i L. McDaniel, J1•., Chai G1VI.ADVISQ�.S, LLC a Florida limited w INSTR 6163148 CLERK OF THE REC $282=00 OR 6045 PG 1878 RECORDED 11/22/2021 4:17 PM PAGES 33 CIRCUIT COURT AND COMPTROLLER, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA tl�e �`��el•� © � certain �.+��-�'-acre. parcel:ofreal ptopei�ty located descr b can; hjbpi t B attached .hereto and made a part hered w13CR.C* A;S; upon the terms and condo desire to excl�a.nge theCounty i'arce� fac• the S A 14 i�rth her�;ixi., th�C©unty Arid the: Developer iand w�HC�RE. Samong other-+cQrisldei-a�ions:s��a��� Developer gill. alsp � l � d�sign,perrx�it .and co��str�uct Parcel at its so le cost and %expense (the "P�'oject") nand he ve di*ai�aage �aset�ent foie operation and irtai�tenance of the the Couri�y; and I`��r, as past. of �hisiandexchange; the ;�erdetei�tionfacility �� fhe ��ttap he .Count'. a. minimum 20�-foot x4 detention facility:: at, i o c*A to w1-3EI�:EA.S, the oilier Jaunty Board of County Co exchange of real pi•c��e.i�t}� is i� the best in�er�st oft�e County. _ IgYIMII�YrM�Y�1Yr�Y�YYIrYII�� A made and r ' .dviso�rs, UNC, 1 and Collier Cotlntyl.-Toj "County"), eacki GNP ADVISORS, LLC L. L3 I��CHAI'�E �,Cft.EEI�iEI�tfi thereinafter referred to as tl�e `�Agreemerit"� i s Chk this of o2 f the "Effective 'f}ate''�, and among Gl� ida limited liabilaitycompany (hereinafter referred to as the ``Developee") i a, .a political ,subdivision of the State of Florida (hereinafter zeferred to as dually referred to as the "Party" and collectively referred:t� as the "Parties." RECITALS.: WHEREAS, C0ut11y :.,s the owner of a certain. 3.79+/" acre parcel. of real propetty located el ih unineorpormed Cniilct• unty,�.ft:northem 0.6+1.. acres of which is; transportation right 6fway, anti is expressly excluded zfrotb,_ hi `Agreement. This parcel, less and except the: north�in 'i�:6�j� acres, is described on Exhibit :fit c� d,hereto and made a part hereof (the County Parcel )..Tide County Parcel is cur tly us ct -di rater detention facility associated • it�h the iri mokaiee Road dralnage systei-n�; and -L w.i I:ER.E.>�S, L�e�elopei• is cn u�incc�rpo.rated Collier County; the `Swap Par�cei''�; a>�d r. r� i�si�ers h�erc�y � tlds that this consideition of Tcxi .11iar'sother consdet-atict� exchanged arziongst fihc patties; and ii� cot�sidet�:tion of the herein, the parties agree as follows; F`�s co�zta in ed I. A11 of the above RECITALS are true and correct and are herciay expressly incorp�irated herein by reference a.s if sit forth fully below, �. The parties agree to the exchange of real property interests and associated iionprovements as set forth belo�r: _ oR 6045 3. Ne�v .Irrt rtiertents. Developer agrees to deign, permit, and construct a crew pond site rind r•elaeei: drainage facilities on the Swap Parcel at its sale crest and expense, including all neeessa 4 -stort v ater pipe interconnections (the "New Improvements"), The New Improvements de ` treatment and attenuation of stormwater runoff for Immokalee Road, shall pr' I1 adificati,a 'A A6A toy 10 e tl'+eatment, attenuation, and discharge from Immokalee oa "Bask *.8" to the. Cocohatchee na['� i_ I be coordinated through a South. Florida Water Management. District Aw �SFWMDA p � i o f obtained *by Developer, and shall result in no increase- of hydraulic grade Ad line elevations for thWA& wi4mg lmmokalee, Road drainage inlets inctuded i "8asln 82' The 46 increase of impervious area`=f the future auxiliary a ry lane for l~tandall Boulevard A .1 linmo�;aiee load shall be modeled at}d nearporatod w to the permi ung of the New Improvements: The County shal l have the opportunity tom_ andapprove the SFWAMD permit and s1�a11 be the co"applicant For respective pemin applioat o, , as needed.. Developer shall coordinate with the Coutrty on all facets of this Project.' `. A .ev lrn rovenments shall be corn lete+d rrfl later than six 4: schedule: Desiz P p months from tine ffecti e bate un sLA . % rwise mutual l agreed upon .by the parties. Perrn fitting. _; , f ofthe Tew Improvements ents shah be colplet 4no late; than ,twelve .(I2). months from the Effective t ;. date uriless.ctherrisetutualiy agree u ;ors _b the parties Ctnstruction of the:New Irnprovernents sha11 be;cumpleted no laterthan two C ,y.4 A A. the -Effective Date. unless otherwise rmutually agr ei d upon oy; the parties. % ,' A. .. ` -, 5-. Plans �for� New Ire rover�ents r "5 onstruction,. Develo er, .at no cast to the AA Count r small r are tell . f, a - , p = P P p x rna y nd na1 r� ; � .g design .,plans -and specrficat oris and provide theta ti the County for revieir, cornn�` t and :pjroval: Plans and spedcati+uns must be approved by th+ County prior to any cons hov,ever, such approval slil[ not be unreasonably withheld. Y %lAA A. ` ``.ti. %, At a. dw 6 approval of Contractors and lnsMctiol A AAA Orcons#io, DevYloper� shall gravid .the County with a 4st of all* proposed conA tractrI TA a. su�bcontracto€ for the Project. Developer shall: not utilize .any contractors or subcontract �o whom the bounty objects. The County may 1~rire a CET. I:rrslaector for, this Project and .shall hau tl cA right to if pect� the work throughout oonstrUction, and the Developer shall promptly cac�+e`e�t,4'14111 .noted €Iefects. Devela er r. P shall provide the ou ty girth cc��nstructton sched>ale aizd pros i pti the County of any delays..or other haEnges its such schedule throtighout the duration ot':;tA Ad. art/ -PAO .. *:s. Ad A Ad A Title Commitment. Prior to construction, Developer shall �rdo apt no:cosf to the ,�., County, a title cofnmitment or �ah attorney`s opinion of -title pertaining to- the. era Parcel, and at .� or prior to closing, Developer shall..r�en�ove or cure any .hens, enctimbrance'.Wdty i�rtle d��'ects revealed in such title commitment or, attorney'$ ti,tlezopihion .that are +ob ectit Add to the County. If, prior to the ctr�nrnetrcernen of construetron, tle County has an ob ectron to title to the SwapParcel, which-. the County determines Developer Acannot, -resolvt witltiin A a reasonable time. period. and with reasonable effort, the C04 unty shall leave the right to terminate this :Agreement as .further• described in paragraph 9 of this Agreement, and thereafter neither the. County nor the- Developer shall have any :further obligations or Iiabil�ity thereunder. 8, Easen�ents: At closing, the Developer will convey to the bounty,; at no cost- to the County, a minimum 2� font drainage easennsnt for operati�tlI and n�aintenanec o#` the dew Impro�er�ents. Pr•iar to �closit�g, Developer• shall coordinate with the Cou�ity ion the precise location of the drainage easement, Developer shall provide aY �ll curve s and le al descri P Lions for such 46 easerrren#=pine , at 11.0 Cos 0 ttorney's op of the drainage r d by a # censed l�`lorida. property surveyor,. for the Counity's review and. approval BCounty, All easement documents shall be subject to :approval by the County ;e. knee conveyed, the County will be responsible fair• the perpetual maintenance asem rat. �k. fA _ t� � .�n.: � he degree l�.eeessa#� for tl�e prtr�ect, :each party here4�y-�ran�s the other party a right'�f;?t �4 to enter upon their respective parcels. l 0. Termirrattr oty may terminate this Agreerr�ent :tie County does not ,:, �:. y. approve the design plans f iAe New Improvements; �2� if the Coutrty is 4 not; reasonably satisfied with title, survey, en.v:ir6h ient.al 4z:off other due diligence investigations . pertaining. to the Swap Parcel• 3 if -the deadlines set f tit l'paragraph 3 ofthis A eeme f4.r +esi " n errrtittin and ,} g 5 p` g� cor3struction have not been m la s t mutually agreed upon extensionts d time. or (4.} 1:f Developer d©est not commence L 66m lbw construction of the New. Improvements in accordance wlth the County approved" design ,1�:: eci ratio s. and releVaat. e��t iits. Develo er may Y PP g p- 1` P p P Y terrrrrnate tl�rs Agreement prior to the&Ipotfi n'oement#of�construction on the Protect 7f`t, determli�cs in its. sole discretion that the coasts a" to itb the Project are not feasiblo ...or. �lirriirrate any ,y ns . benefit to the .D.evel`oper from tl�€s Agree 1 eni;ould Developer exercise its termination rigl1ts} any casts f ncurred . re.lated� to -the Project S14. l i . 1►'Inc Ole iy by Developer. Prcjcct..on�o. Developer' I notify the County in writing once earstruction .• 4. ofthe New Improvements :has been cornpletedii du I. � li have 30 days follo�rz�ng receipt ofthis notice to inspect the �Swap� Parcel acid. blew . f tipr•ovib nt5,, 'following `coar�pletion, but pr or to. Josin:g, Developer steal] provide to the County all i opa4d `1 errnit completion certifications, as� built �c�rtstrrrctic rr plans, are updated srcrivey of the � ar�vic�ence that all �ntr�actors, subcorntractoifs and materialmen have. been paid, and e ' c , o the County of lien waivers,, Developer shal l also prov ide executed deed ' and easement .cony " yance doeurnerts'or rev iev► by s the -County Attorney s Office, .. -.._ 1' +Clos�n ,The closing fa►r the exchange. of Parcels:. Will ?._:held an a date mutually agreed upon by the parties, brit shall'occur� no later than three (3)`n� t1�� er pro,�+cct completion uhless otherwise agreed upon by the Parties. Developer shall convey i Si?a Pamel to _the County as 'well as all �i'�lew ln��pravenrients th�es�eon, and County .shad accept ��� ��:�: l`pro�+einents. The County steal! sirn��Ita�n�eously convey �l�e County Parcel to Develop�z, -�=��3e�l+aper• shall 6e responsible for all recording fees WIG closing costs for both Parcels; At Mee c o�,t' g, the County well deliver to Developer the following: - a� :� warranty deed with fee sinnple tide free and clear• ofal� liens and encumbrances except non-rnonetaFy UTIUUMbrUn eS, if any} conveying the County -Parcel to Developer, in tihe fore of l xhibit Q b} An owner}s Tile P6 icy is ering the. County. Parcel with no ob, ectionable title exeeptliorts c} Possession of' -the Ccunty Tract; and d} ll otherksuch documents and instruments as may be reason Any and a to effectuate -.the transfer of -the County Parcel as provided herein: in, PG 1881 �►.t:the clQsi��g, Developer will deliver to the County the full©`�ring 'war ranty deed with fee simple title free and clear of all liens and encumbrances '. 4, �io: e eept non monetary encumbrances, if any) conveying 'the Swap. Parcel to the � au y, in the f`ort� of l��hibit Ca b}A bill :` f sale, owner's affidavit, attorney affidavit, and subordination for any New ,Irr Bents not covered by subsection (a) above, .in. the forms of Exhibit D, ff ne6 ssa c) ` `hI& I` cute�d drainage easement described in paragra 'h 8, jn theform, of Ekhtbit E _ LL d An � V= ' 1e Policy coverin the Swap Parcel # no objectionable title g 13 e ceptlons. e) 1'ossessiotl` f theV-$wa Parcel and New.lirprovements; and :. f) An and all othe su64,documents and instruments as may be reasonably necessaary s to effectuate t)Zt tr`��ne�-�f the Swap .Parcel as provided herein, IV _ ,-;.�. Y "L 13. Maintenance., Upon � da aIn Hof the Warranty Deed for the Syria �'arccl, the County w111 beConl-ek solely tespons1b1 44 th :perpetual operation. and maintenance of the storm. vale management on filewapl trceh41 ch �nclucles the :stormratez• pipes; starnwatet� pond }:and associated I discharge into the CD.& � .e canal 1. ;waive• oiabiiity .and Clisr .�o r, on behalf of, .itself; its successors and . =pie asstg s jncluding any and all ftEturc owners:a ,.both commercial and 6residential., within the Development), hereby waives any and all .6a M§ dair ages, ;i�ncludirtg but not lffnited to l~`Uwe business damages an lass of access as a reS�c�f% ho : �•pposed o�rerpass at 'Intersection of l andall Boulevard and lmtnokalee Road or its constr t t �, eveioper shall give ail successors, assigns, teriiahts and buyers, both residential and coin xfopiov rho purchase or lease land from Developer a separate. written notice of the planned roveAis:iff v�i �l�e s�ate��nt that the Coctn��i rviil not construct any sound dull or other b4tii ter off' any k� 1 rd&tce the: impact or noise of the. overpass, _ ` -. _a 15. Compliance with.Law, Obligations of the County tz t4 i " green7en�t arc s object Of to approval by the Collier County. Board of County C4Cnt'1'tISSiOners, an, an ►ther applicable, state, local, or Ofedcral lave. \ IV 16. Cost of Advertisement, Developer shall cover the ful l cost ,rIV .I. dverti�ing this excha:n:ge of -property operty in .a newspaper of general Circulation published in the Cori y,--if any: Legal Flatters 1 7. the burdens ofthis Agreement (including. the option to put�ellase��;::shall b'e� bind.ing ttpQn, and the .benefits of this �4gree�-ne�it .shall ixlure to, ail successo�•s x�. interest to the parties �o this greernent, including any Property swaps. 1 -8. Developer acknowledges that the failure of this Agieerr�e.�1:t to addivss any permit, condition, term or restiviction shall not ��lieve +either the applicant:or owner, Q�-their successors ot■ • im :TILA [& W ::�►•� } ass i�gns, o f the n+ec perm l 1 nlg . r�qu reIF die l hich are aWf I this Agrecme t comply with s essity of cotnptying with any tavv, � nance3 t•Ltle ter regulation-t govert1ing said 'rents, conditions, terms or restrictions, event state or federal laws arc ertact�d after the execnttlon of this Agreement, c OF tolo and preclude in whole or in par the panties' comp] iance with the terns �� thin,' :n such event this Agreement shall be modified or IF as is necessat to u:ch ws%I in a manner which best reflects the intent of this. Agreement. This Agreement shall nQ.t 13 b strued or° characterized as a development agrCerrrent under the Florida oca1 + ovemmeriit_ evelopment Agreement Act. IF IF 20. Ail ailiesrSP_RI .Ox xecute his Agreement prior or to it being submitted for approval by rlie Collier County Boar4f.o County Commissioner s. This Agreetiiet� t , halt be recorded by the County in the Official R ' 0 0s t Molli�er County, Florida, within f6tUrteen (t 4) days after .the County 4enters into this greern It ; eveloper shalt -pay all costs of recording this Agreement. ,A copy of the recorded documelolt_*Wt� It irovided to al l pacttes upt�t� request, lF.. IF t .'hs Agreement shall b oveip. l; lorida. The paztles shall. attempt through negottatort betweenuthorlec is there .remains a dispute under this Agree ent, IF FIJI A lternative dispute Resolution Proctdure. may then file an action `in the Circu it Gour't` o with respect to any disputes artsts�g out ofthts ed by. at�d constx�;red under �t�e Taws of the Mate of i to: resrilve any dispute concerning. this ..A.,grecn�ent p ei ; tativ�s.. If these Fe IN ores are not successful, and ..' w partte shah first: use *the Cout�ty's then cUrrent wtn the co lclusiorn.ofthIs procedure, eitfo= party l`'.; tet, ou41 �ty,which Shall be the exclusive venue �.�. This A.gree�nent is a perst�nat A�n�eetn� trN IF ot be sold, tratsferre;d; or assigned, in whole or. in pa i, County, vvl�i`h County tray, in its solo discret:lo n, deny: IF shIF c; ��ig�ts .a.t�c� .ntere$fis hereunder may }�u� the lat i�r �rr�i�ten e�ansent of fihe t, 23. This.A.greement constitutes the entire agreeti�er�;tween tl�+e parties with cespect to thectivitzesot�d herein and supersedes and ta�kcs the place of.a;,a d ail previous. agreements etitere+d into between the at -ties hereto relatit `a p �g to the ti�ansacton' carnplated herein, .All prior representations, undertakings, and: agreements by or between the...IF * t ies'�€e�eto with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement are -merged into; and expressed in; t �IF ,•eement, and any and art prior rept�esentations, urtfertakings, and agreerneli�ts by a�zd betv'n- axties v�►ith•espect IF IF Bp thereto: herebyaxe .canceled. b;-w F.4A IF 4 IF I .�4. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed ot• co�ist��:ted to create 6eveen or among arty of the. partiesarty joint venture or pat'tnet5hip noi• other�isc g�artfi to ode . e '. , authority or power to. bind any other patty hereto to any agreemebt wvhatsoeve V A:I�nrP; ��i� PA.G1� Ti DEFT �LA�� 51�1�t1-�Tt.,1r�E PAGE TC► �t'�L�,t�'i�ir the l*ig►#til Ji . ZN WITNESS wHEREOP, tl�e pax -ties he�-et© have caused tills A.gi•een�ent to be executed by their approprIate offcials, as of the date first above written. L y aP Attest: ,' y ;"IF =:1 BOARD,,C F CQUNTY COMMISSIONERS CRYS," nlIerlc FIe nIFlFeI b tV.Fo4b ZJrFt r. , A I ; B�y i. 4 `�� ` i '•f t "I;_ ;l.f. : •� r_',• i i� rF • :.;^r - AS TO i `E 1?R `� 1� O; lFIF IVIF 5 igned, sealed and .delivered in the priesen8Qol S ignat�rt�e� inter _Name S i gnatu Printed Name STATE OF VL.O R.IDA Ct�UNTY OF COi�L,•IER By: COUNTYYRIQ'A PENNY TLOIZ, Chaii- GIVI A.D�ISORS, LLC 'a 1� (or•id.a lirnited liability company Nam Trtle: r, I IF 4 II OFF FI IF I FOP .a For The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before r�.�e this I Advise liability cor-npany, who is personally lmown to tine ^�- as identification. A.ppro � legalit . as to �ortn aid . �}►shl�ar, Assistant County Attorney Notary play = f F s,F'�L C, a Florida limited .*"or has produced 41 i (A omrnission Ex�ir�es: SANDY SEMAAN Notary Public. Staxe of Florida Cotnmiss�oo Na. GG302858 Commission Expires 02/ I I/2Q23 0 PG 1885 so 0 r. 9 too stolt do I a.rf • ,s*4 so to • _.. .. et Growth Management Department ` F Development Review Division * := - ; .4.`;k Tract 3� a� Golden Gate pUDIIc records cif Copier Cc Range 27 East, CollierCorr Co IF E�Hf BIT "A" Legal Description Golden Gate Estates Unit No•23) tee :U-nit Flo, �3, Plat Soak �, pag+�s 9 tl�ro�g� � � of the % c ida, located in ecfiion 7: Township qts Routh, k.IFlad c. S�rl�ject to Easements and I�es��-i Contal"i"g.�� Acres more or~ 1es �• 1 • l` i ; W L:�Berman, P.S.M. 0 not •o* ...� �f lorrdej 5L veyor and dapper LS 508 ;�� ,r, , r : ,/1 � au0 go 0 # and Surveyor .. tJoss . 'J��y�j Pok WAN 1"04 07/2021 4 '�. to j c`, ' �i 2021FogeO03 1 loop o so t,. o �oo • AR4' 0 r Floi•L -r• ,r' , to . r cord . F�ge 1 af' 1 �.St30 N. �l�rscs�c�c I}rfac, l�i�ples I'IarE�1K 3��0� (23�� 25�-�+�00 's b `�- Gr�wl`h �anager�$nt I�eparfimer�� Development Review Division EXIT I B iT "A" of Tract 30 of Golden Gate Estates Unit No. 23, Plat Book 7, ugh 10 of the public records of Collier County, Florida, (Southern Portion of Tract 36) All #hat part �rct=6 of Golden Gate Estates Unit Na, 23, Plat hook 7, pages 9 through 14 of the UH records of Collier County, Florida, being more particularly described as foI s; Corn mencing at the .,Nadi 6a4t Corner of said Tract 36, Thence along the eastline5id Tract 36, South 00°19'�16" West 73.a'1 feet to the Point of Beginning df-4 6p8 petberein described, Thence continue along ,sas.'Iine South 40°10'10" West 449.36 feet to the . ... southeast corner of said Trat'r 5 Thence along the south line-s ' S-awc r ct 36, North 89°40'50" West 330.00 feet to the southwest corner of said Traci- Thence along the west line of skid �: 3 hence leaving said line North 8� a h described. North C3f�° 19''i �0" East 402.32 feet; �t 333.33 feet to the #*dint af.�eginning of the parcel herein Subject to Easements and Restnations�:; Re -ra % Bearings are assumed and based on the.0. 6 )no of Tract 36 being North QQa 1 Q' 10" East. Containing 3.23 Acres more or less. :;- c.Dat IL Ma€`cus L. Berman, P.S.M. Florida Surveyor and Mapper C.S b086 Gounty and Surveyor i••/atV, 1 y/0I f40�+1 Ref: �02�Iy00� '. :.�• • `Y: Oa ` f; 0• •I +� 1law L IL z$a0 ?Z. Hat•3esho� Dealt, Nx��aa �lorid� 3�lOd (239� 25Z-xd� i =XN�=ETA %S:?) L&GS�k :9G;I Ct�[u- DD C�IQ?)O N THE SOUTHERLY PORTION OF TRACT 36 OF GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT No. 23, PLAT BOOK 7, PA6E 9, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. CUR �" TABU' 1Vo. DEC T� RAD/US LENG CH BE`,�f�' G D1ST�4/YG`B �1 3519 5JJ4o460 JJ461V M 812 2 40 4 3344 06 ff C2 Q 100 MMOKN GAR p.R. 846K 3 t� t�AGE 2,ST 6 3 .OfwAY C 2 =z,mo v tz COID�� SATE 41 1. S�N�S ARE BhSED Oi�i THE 1N[5T 1113E OFTttACf �6 HEiNQ htflR�ii 00' 14'ttY FJIST. 2. QlMEAi3t0A1S M� 1N F&ET 11lVD flt:CiMi4i,S i1-IEREt�F. 311. SUB.I�CTTt} eEA1S��fr�E.CAI.�jTS/I��AJ�pDR(1�tnTR1L'ifiDEhi3COF RECQRR. y, F�AR{`jQ. �� 1 i\�ftl 7i N.i...l RLrI`LV InV�C �i11 �.Gvr?,7. pp�t�1 Cj� y, .RINGI C ...... .... MAl'�CUS L. BBRMAt�, P.S.i+ii.� • .,' :. [, I ; -• � C44!.t.tER COUNTY SU�tVEYpF�.i : ,�; '_• Development Review Divislon growth Management Department ZSt30 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples Pion to 341t}4 ona: 239-2524885 Fax 239M252-6476 r}aTe: Sheet No. SCALD: Fite i�1n: a-07-2a2'1 2 of 2 1�- � ou 2021 �005 y#�Oflonnlx� ►nd II�D'/�tFvw�EngSrtietiinq D+psryrtynt�EnQ�nrali/•p fo►timylGlG SIMy�YOR.a�'+ZtjGS1G+"M d+G fsL/yasj?D21•8QS Lrvth fafigb itttcf+ of Lrk@ 3+b 4Qf U23.dK*J. 14ViII'2y lO.QS:2� AtS Auk,Ckp PaF tUe+wal bocvmentwtianl_pc? 0 at too, s. 4444 G� Growth I'�llanagement Departmer�� Development Review Division E.XHI�IT "A" r n Of OpArt of TraCt 36 of Goiden Gate Estates Unit No. 23, Plat Book t pagp§AtF�rough 19 of the public records of Collier County, Florida. (Northern Portion of Tract 36) All that parfi �f"�r�� -��B of Golden Gate Estates Unit No, 23t Plat Book 7, pages 9 �,� 'c Coun Florida bein . more articular) through 10 of the�,, ublt records of Collier ty, g p Y described as follgisc; r Beginning at the Nett A t c purer of said Tract 33; Thence along the nortl•t,-Ii e` s id Tract 3$, also being the south right-of-way line of lmmokalee Read �B:R r ,,} ,.3 4.'i I feet along concave to the north, h4vi 03°35'19" and being subtend feet to the northeast corner's Thence along the east line o1 Thence leaving said east line a non -tangential circular curve �,ius flf 533�•,�6 feet, through a central angle of a it ord which bears North 81 °22'40" East, 334.06 i 6t 36 T a . , South 00°19'14" vilest, 78,01 feet; a te of said Tract 36; t2a` 5" West 333.33 feet to a paint on the west Iir•�` - - _ ' .k.. Thence alon said line North 00°1 East` g Tract 36 and the Paint of Beginning Qf f a. te Subject to Easements and Restrictions of i Bearings are assumed and based on the we = 00"19'10" East. Containing 0.66 Acres more or less. Marcus L. Berman, P.B.iill, I^ )bride Surveyor and Mapper LS 5086 County Land Surveyor Date: 10107/2t�21 ref: �a21-OQ4 3.11 feet tt� said Northwest corner of I herein described, Tact 3B being North �so 'Pow At ot IL VON a, ,i: �JOA to . r�ORION 4 It 'K: ,�,, .,. , . tPWs �"- Alt aw/ _.. so x8t}0 N. H4rs�ahae Drive, �l��lta Ploc�da 34gd {239) 2.52-2d00 PG 1889 c��taor�a� a THE NORTHERLY PORTION OF TRACT 36 OF GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT No. 23, PLAT BOOK 7, PAGE 9, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORxDA. PlA7 t�dRTF� i- M lYo. D�� T� RADlU.� L�lV�t CH 8 .�RlIVG D/ST�#1YC�" C1 0343519 5334. 46 334.1 N. 61:2.2 40Fo 334. 06 MOKIP M RO B46 �.G1�1111 DIP of 4� G�JLDEN GATE E:;S.1 UNIT No. 23 N.89°4{?'�0"Ittl. 33�1.�iQ' •t t : • ' f f' • .t • ' i 1 ' i •/ • ( �. a f q 1 0- OIL r + 40 Otto Woo Mari P.S.M : ' lJiAR U$ L. BR..l: t dd�.LIER C0UN7`Y SURVEY69 Do ,.: ' _ ;; _ :-+ FLORDID IDA SURVEYOR h MA F ��&-5068 • {' - toot a DID 04 to C�OLL(ER+C{�UNTY �eveiopment Review sion Growth 1 enaumIflu #Department 2$00 North Horseshoe Driv$, Naples Florida 04104 Ph met* 239-252-6885 Fax 239-252•-6476 WIND gate: Sheet Na. SCALE; '! 0�07-242�1 1" toot 100' E�ite Na: 0 kL1ltt•+ri•nq a>td il�pvtat{erilteptnertt/tq Acpsrtr+++nA[+>II3+wlky Folde»5�iC110 SVRVkY diVllMl�aSltielden data< &t+tesUal.1.4G1 rk.th �e,tron of 2nq 36 6GE i112.d,/.p,1DJ�J1.tr21 SC.02:12 /Sd, AI+IoUG l�bF(Gt�tcr>tt Dotweerttilk64pe.3 •� .1� :•! F IF - ._ +� - •?fit 4 IF -. 7IF • a Q, + k OF +'.:. . IF :�: J• `t ' a �; F . I' 1[ 1. 4 Is IF d a' oR 6045 PG 1891 V Growth Mar�agernent Departm�nt Development Review Division EXHIBIT pB" Legal Description Tract 62, Golden Gate Estates Unit No.23) Tract 52 of Go�,�er�;e Estates Unit No. public recordsY of .Ceder County.; Florida, Range 27 East,-c11'€er Cou.0ty, F1Drida. 23, Prat Book 7, pages 9 #hrough 14 0� the located in Section 27; Township 08 South, .Subject to Easements end Ro` tractions of Record.. �ontalnrng 5 Acres more�:ar,[e�s:tLI e coos A. Le . rrpan, P.S.M. fig tr,t da-Bca yar and Mapper E..S 5i �nt�r,'° Surveyor r, i nO Date: 10/07/2021 Ref: 2021-0.02 Page f cif Z ��Oa N: i��rseshoc Rrtvc, Nn�lus Florida 3�iiD4 (Z39) z.'�2�2�OQ oR 6045 PG 1892 EXHOBOT B I SKE7CH OF DESCRRPT ON ALL OF TRACT 52 OF GOLbEN GATE ESTATES UNIT No. 23, PLAT BOOK 7, PAGE 9, COLLIER COUNTY, FLOAMA. dap, ILI, I I _ _ ... I 14 pU 36 53 a i �- I I •'. t"k . r. �.4 I ti ,:,papa I PLAT" NORTH `:z I GRAPHIC S C �,�� ; 0 100 15a `a- a lapp pp _ 5.89'4{)' Sd"E. 330.00apt _ I I IN FEET I lu 1 inch 100 ft. � I 4,411pif papa' pap `; r Al I alp 1. :vp.'<r '. �pill'f C7 aepa tt; :.J k I l' S app Onral I I ,,. I pap _all I ,; I i ` •.pep s '• ;;Q T , ;:. C.. 444a 1. r`+ I �►155 A ,. I I o ;;37 p .. . , :pl.. V, ..' z :. :: - - I z .:4 o I I I .� '' `•• • .T 7 I c I I hi.. I I ap tipp app pap Or r Ati j I appall 00 pp i t l' .L. _ar pa 4 J K_ pt I _ .,� e- � - iop _ tr {F :"ap ap)'i., aI .( pap S.89°40'50"E. 330.00'la a 22ND AVE NEAll 60' ROAD EASEMENT 1, BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE WEST LINE OF TRACT 52 BEING NORTH Od• 19't0' EAST. '•� r...:L� ` : ... • - 2. DWENSIONS ARE IN FEET AND DECIMALS THEREOF. CUS L, $ERMAN, i'S�VI: -"� �� , , ' 3. SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. COLLIER COUNTY SURVEYCIR.�� � , 4.• 4YARCE L CONTAINS 5 ACRES M440f3Ir OR LESS. FLORIDA SURVEYOR & MR'Iv$ soadt1 �, ,`;: . COLLIER COUNTY Development Review Division Growth Management Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Maples Florida 4104 Phone: 239-252-6885 Fax 23911tio,252"6476 Dace: Sheet No. SCALE. File No: 1 o-1 1iomit2021 2 of 2 1" = 201 2021 .002 N1}D�„t;nq antt t.�„yt;eM[nQ:nrtrAn�jpaps�tm►�E►+glndrh,p tddt�q+tao 5tJA5tEt DRA+tih►JGS�G�Wen G,ut t�ISHs1,1'07S��fuiT Tr�el S?dw¢. TOJf7l2IIti SAA2A ML IwFvCADtb1(dtnual0ecs,maM��niR[7 tz :. -44+ IV_ _ t'� t;M1' OR 6045 PG 1894 Prepared by and return #a: o!#ier county `rranspodation Emineeft- ROW 2885 Sou Homeshoe Drive N pie ; F rids,34104 L PRQ�#�CT��� PARCE 1=0L I `� wA�RANTY D��D THIS y1lARRANTY. ,DEED is made this day of 20 by Einsert grantorts) namets) in,,,p and bold followed by marltal status In lawur case non-bt "J? whose marling add s [Insert mailing address] (collectively [delete If not applicable], "Grantor"}, to COLL! ' ERAZOLINTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, whose mailing address ;s 3299 Tami ni TraWEast, c/o the Office of the County Attorney, Suite 800, Maples, FL 3 4112 ("Grantee"). ' IT ,r (Wherever used herein'-::� respective heirs, legal tapresen as the context requires.) 1/1IITfVESSETH: That Grafit hereby conveys to Grantee, the fc and other valuable consideration, �rgntor" and `Grantee" Include all the parties to this instrument and their as.�8rs, and assigns. Grantor and Grantee are used for singular or plural, fc�r.,sn ,in consideration of the sure of Ten Dollars ($10.00) eeerpt;4nd sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, wtng:deiCIffbed land situate in Collier County, Florida: See Exhibit " "attached Being [choose one] all ! a portion' o recorded in Official Record Book County, Florida. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the the sage, ttsgetl appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise ap a, [or insert legal description] : property conveyed to Grantor by Deed . �_ , of the Official records of Collier �'th _�tl.;tie tenements, Meredi#arttents, and :ng in e simple forever. Grantor hereby covenants and warrants that Gran vit , Wolly seized of said property in fee sire le; that Grantor has ood ri ht and lawful authorl self a d convey theproperty; that Y Grantor herebyfull warrants the title to the roe and wul; defers the same agaEnst the lawful Y p l� rtY.. claims of all persons whomsoever, and that the property is fr of alt,,encumbrances except for easements, covenants, and restrictions of record and the lien' of-^rsl estate taxes and assessments not yet due and payable. Grantor represents titat Grantor's property Lchoase one] isies#-eat nAt homestead property, nor is it contiguous therett�. This property [choose one] Is ! is not being acquired by CollieirZotii petfiion in eminent domain and [choose cane] is ! is not subject to the re&tt7cl Section 73.013, Florida Statutes. (choose "Is" If a condemnation suit ffle '-vproperty [or] is t#y. ursuant to a io:i posed by +�ittft�d]'�� This property is being acquired under the threat of condemnation and documentary stamp tax. [delete if not a capital improvement project] [ signature page follows ] is ::eXsm � .��`��rom aR 6045 PG 1895 lf�! }i1liTfVESS VlIHEREC}F, Grantor has $xecuted this instrument on the day and year first above -w��tten. - . Sign Printed �l arr-e Signat�cre 4Witness ��� Printed Name _ ,;` :�� -�. ' �� STAVE CF FL{�RiDA �; ':..''�;`.;: � '7_; COI�NTY pF :� �1r .: 1,; tt ;, The Grantor: [name of grantor, caps not boi [name of grantor, Scapa not boldj ,Lr, �' � , �'. ow�dged before me by means of ❑physical ,' �. , da of 2C� b [insert presence �; y � � Y grantors} d��w marital status in lower case non-bdld�, who: `jam ;�` �:;, is 1 are �choase ones persorraily knavrn,;, ;r�n$�.._'':� =: �` ^ `�� 4R ,� � �-. �w: produced �] a driver's iicer�se, CAR ❑' � ''�`'`� - , ��,. - - ,.. ;.:;�:`' -fig. �. �� ��_. J'. fE}regO�rtg �rlstrurx�e�tt was c#d� ;.. - flr � online notarization `<: _� �i$ . -�- narne(s} in Daps and tsoitt fp110 (sfi�x nota,�$1 seal above) Approved as to faun and legality: .�..ar.�..�... ��....wr.a Assistant County Attorney � / � Signatur$ .of2�ary �fblic �. 8: ��� as ides#ifica#ion. printed Marne `",-..r `-_:° Serial I CommissE �' # (if;an�}�4: filly Commission Expir+�s:;-��-�� �` }" ., --_- ,� :,�: - -:� - a. -�- _, ''� . _����.. - J . ,. -r.:re.� `: �. �l� +� _.__.... �L • Woe a a .I � � ■l l!Jl r'J I i t I�'orrn� S � Rev• 200�- (TJtillfy �aeiiities 'warranty Deed and 8111 of Sa�c� [Leave P blank Space in upper right hand corner for recording purposesi. DR AINAG FACILITIES WARRANTY DEED AND BI1i.,�► SALE �. THIS INDENTURE made this day of 120 , between'[Narne of Grantor - see Instruction No. '` a t i-iTi_dter referred to as "Grantor"), and the BOARD OF COUNTY Y. CO i1vlISSlQNERS OF COLL JAR COUNTY, FLORIDA, its successors and assigns, (hereinafter referred to as "Grantee"). _ :I'RtESS ET1-l: That sand Grantor, for and in consideratrc p ;t :::s m of Ten Dollars 10.00) and other good and valuable acknowledged, consrderatron to said Grantor in hand paid by;��� atc�,`Gr has granted, bargained and sold to the said Gran-te, ar ntee, the receipt whereof is hereby � identify all types of drainage facilities being cony thereof lying in, on, over and under the following ft repair andfor maintenance of said facilities, systems) in Collier County, Florica, to wit. ,rantee's heirs, successors and assigns forever, all inage facilities and/or system(s) or portion(s) r nd, for operation, relocation, installation, ,)A'ignl(s) thereof, all situate and lying and being See exhibit "A}' attached hereto and incorporated' ' reference herein.) �I�hibit "F." attached hereto is a sketch or other graphic: i•epresentaton that depict$ the physrcal locat�On of the dl•arnage systbylt ` Conveyed.} ' 1 ,f '•-. tip_ and said Grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to sand dra€rage facilitieanj or poi•tior�{s) thereof, be they realty, personalty, or• mixed, and Grantor- will defend si __ ':anst all claims of all persons whomsoever. For the purposes of this conveyance, the drainage,. ae �;it4i �1,system�s) andfor• P P ::Y..� -, onions thereof conee ed herein shall not be deemed to convey an of the lands esc.j ibed in either P t} Y y y exhibit. Grantor and Grantee are used for singular or plural, as context allows, A `sketch or• other graphic rrepresentation showing the location of the drainage facilities, etc., being conveyed is attached as exhibit «B,s TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same r.tnto the Grantee and its assigns, together with the right to eater upon said land, excavate, relocate andlor take ar intradr.ace materials for• the purpose of constructing, relocating, Page i of 2 operating, reps#ring and/or ratElerWise maintaining drainage systerczs the�'eon, Grantor and Grantee are used for singular or Plural, as the context requires. IN Wi ME : .,Z. EO , Grantor has caused these presents to be executed the date and year rs t above riSLY i�. 4 It a'7— , Itness and signature block - see Instruction No. 3] '[A cknawledgn�ent and 4- notary block -see Instruction No. 4] Prepared by: �nam e of person=repJarlrtg: �h is instrusnentJ Address of arsonpreparingthisistru C P ,4 - y: ':+ \\ tot c o712021 =: ;`; .. lb '.:;. 1. Ile Page 2 of � • MA Form 6 � Rev. 200� (Owner's AffYdavit) xeofee l- STATE QF 'S AFFi�A'U'IT CtJi.Ji�l`l`Y OF _� n�"rn��l^ Count BEFO E ME, the un ersigned authority, personally appeared , who to me is well known, and havi l . �y game is :ei�r-=clty sworn and under oath, deposes and states ; am over the age of twenty-one (21) years, ain sid jul is, andtq have personal knowledge of tl�e ass '�•ted herein. 2, I am the owner of said real property:lafe >� "Awhich shows the location of the su `c .,d`ri 6`ry 3. All persons, firms, and corporations, inc !ge i~acilitios being conveyed. sub -subcontractors, rnatel•ialmell and suppliers to plans and specifications, or extra iteins; used ink'" a.nd descriE�ed on Exhibit enet•al contractor, all labot`ers, subcontractors ai��i furnished services, labor or materials according ;c iI. .action, installation and/or repair of [identify type of drainage facility] drainage systetn(s) or portion( have been paid in full and that such W014K has been full current owner of such facilities. • -epf on the real estate hereinafter described, G 1 ._lwt`.d and unconditionally acce tea b the A . . 1} �' ;5 IIF p�` claims have been made to the owner, not• is any suit 'napendi rig an behalf of any contractor, subcontractor, sub -subcontractor, supplier, laborer or inaterial�inen, ank4nlu voLl Lpttel mortgages or conditional bills of sale have been given or are now outstanding as to the subject dra agae"sys-t"em:(s) ots portion(s) thereofLI placed upon or installed in or on the aforesaid premises. he subject drainage s stems of portion(s) s thereof and/or ease R Title tot bj`nt(srf +ny, being conveyed he Count is not encumbered b an recorded mortgage, recorded assignment orAr�nts or profits, by any the y Y Y....�.. recorded Uniform Commercial Code Financing Statement, or by any other recorded � doottrrseht that imposes a security interest that could negatively affect conveyance of marketable title to the drainage system(s) or portions) thelReof and/or any easetiient being conveyed to the County. OR Title to the drainage systems} or portioti(s} thereof and/or easement (s) being conveyed to the County is subject to the following security interests) by the following recorded instrumet7t(s}; Page i of 3 �� •� .!� •!! l .Mortgage {or Assignment of Rents and Proftts� [describe only teeoided instrume�its that impress � a security. interest against title to the systems} or portions} thereof andlor any easeme��tt being conv�yed.o the County] to Mist name of the mortgagee{s}] ,dated , ,�_____� and` �t��.eat t�,R. Book , 1~'age et seq., l'ttblic Records ofCollie�• County. I, 2. [..1��=1#r�aticir�g Statement, recorded at C�,R. Boob ,Page _______�, P��blic Records of Colli�r� �o �`� .: -� ''��` � f Sta e at 'r`allahassee Leo» Count �'Iorida at O.R, 3. �JCC-;� �r:�corc��.�vw�th Plortda Secretaz•y o t ( Y)� Book ,�Y.M1`pag�_{ _,�Y, ,�� :���`� '- each mort � e andlor each assi . nrr�ent of �{cnts and rofi#s, and �TNSTRUCTIaN• fihe �,ffiant must list gg� � each tJC�--1, and�or each �othe`r reorded docun�et�t that is a security interest that could negatively affect co��veya��ce of good and a���e�,���ble bile to any of tl�c drainage systetn(s} or portions} thereof �(andlor easement{sj, if any} being Gad; � fed_ to the County. If good, tnarketabie title to the drainage system{s} or portions} thereof and/or any �ase�rie� � ��;�eing conveyed is encumbered by aczy such recorded instrume��t, the Affant.must briefly describe ea�.I� s�+��,.�`ecord�ed security instn.tme�nt, incl«ding the book aid I�rst page where tha�.security instrument'hasi�+��reco�tied. It is not necessary to attach a copy Qf any such recorded a� �. document to the.Af�idavit. Igo not list any��N+�t�e of Co�nmencernent or any Reservation oFMine�•al Ttights, etc., because such �dtic�ments .da not`Iin�pFs � security interest against good, marketable. title to the .. .. :, drainage�system(s} or portion{s� thereof'�l -,,r�°�s�ment(s}, if any, being conveyed to the County. �:;;_ . �. As and on behalf of the owner of the subj:t,�dra�n �� � - consideration hereby agree and guarantee, to h ;: p`lorida harmless against. atty lief, claim or suit by ` supplier, mechanic, rnatet•ial�tnan, or laborer, and aj systern(s} o�• portianEs} thereof, does for valuable o�rd of County Commissioners of Collies- County, r �er;r��: contractor, sttbconttaGtor, sub-scabco��traeto�•, nstl3�t,el �nartgages, seccirtty interests or repair of the subject drainage systecn(s) or portions) thereof'by ar pi�tral, as the context rewires. ►r �b�l:�a��;f of t�wner. �.ffiant is Used as si��gcrlar ,. { �'� � �`. �� �� �ti, :1;. 4:: ?. 'I'he drainage system{s} or portions} thereof referred to �xn described in tE�e attached l�xhibit "A". F�3I2'�'ii�It A��IAI�'I' SA''�'��'T'� N,A.U��T. located withifl the ��eal pi•opet•ty -� _ A>`��: :- ����� Ir ; �. .J� ,, �. ,,� :ti 5 1 ,(T 1�' �� 'Ta...- �� I�AT�D this day of , �0�. � � - ��Y�. C3wnerlAff�ant's Signature . Printed I�lan�e of A,ffiant SwrJRN T� AND SUBSCRIBED bef©�•e me by means of Cl physical p�•esenee o�• Q online nota�•ization, tl� i s day of , 20 , by perso��ally known or Q produced _�Pe of ide Page 2 of 3 as identificatio��. who is t7 •' .!�Rolm ��ig�ature �P�•�nted or T�%'p�c Prepared �y: [na..me Public) �e'�f�otaly Public �j of:pei preparing this instrument] [Actress of person p�eir,�ing dais instrutnec�tI I VA 4 �.t ri .. ..\.' N IL y`. Page 3 of 3 �yail PG 1902 Form 5 - R.ev, 20a4 - (Afforney�s Affidavit:} ATT+QRN IF I ;_ STATE OF - -e_of StateYa. IF COUNIT OF .*:i4filloame c 'S A�'FlI3AV'I'I' t. BEFORE ME, the undersi acttl�ority, on this day of , 20 ., personally a ppeared , who is to tne well known, and having been sworn upon oath, deposes and states: _F I IF l , My name is , i any over the age of twenty-one ( t) years, am otherwise Sul furis, and have pers., 1(.4*Fledge of the facts asserted herein. _�� 2. I am a licensed attorney, Ron'&1 B >; L` >. .,: , authorized to practice law in Florida and am .` .t ,, currentl racticing law in t ,51t`` of Florida. My business address is �y `T My business telephone numberOF �s A IF l.4 ` My business mailing address is _FRI., IFF IF IF l 3. This Affidavit is given as an inducement to the Bo,d_County Commissioners of Collier County, IF Ia_ Florida, to accept the dedication or conveyance of iden %o drainage facility] drainage system(s) o�' p Y .; portion(s) thereof located within or upon the real property* F bed x the attached Exhibit "A"', which is incor orated herein by reference, said land being located in Col . er.:� �nty, Florida. p ;`. 4. The Affiant has examined record title information to the underiy' x• al property and the drainage referenced in this affidavit inel.ud tigta:.not limited to, information facilities being conveyed to the County . *; requested from the Florida Secretat•y of State relative to any Unifoi' coililinercial Code financing IF statements,IF {. ` e described herein is ive fulle 'a ' azne of owner as 5. The record owner of the underlying real property [g g :�� IF IF it appears in title Worixtation; if owner is an entity, make reference to the laws c► tIF ^ar jurisdiction under which entity was created and presently operates] (hereinafter "Owner"). The Owner acquired record title to the subject real property by instrument recorded at Official Records Book , at Page [insert official record book and first page of instrument where owner acquired title], Public Records, Collier County, Florida. [INSTRUCTION: if the record owner is an entity, the Affiant trust indicate that he has examined corporate or partnership infat�nation obtained from the jurisdiction under which the entity was created and presently Page l of 3 operates, that tle entity is current and active wn said State or jurisdiction, that the enti#y cs currently authorized to do business in the State of Florida, and identify the exact name and tide of the persons authorized :to ekeLX p to the instruments on behalf of that entity in conjunction with the conveyance of the subject real` rsonal property. Pursuant to Section 689.071, Florida Statutes, IF the record owner is trustee, the ::; ffiaat hall state that the Trustee has full power and authority to execute instruments of conveyance .oir el lf,; o the Trust a nd, if applicable, incorporate by reference and attach suppoi�ng documentation.)<:,� tftl .oprd owner is an individual, the A.fflant must state the marital status represented to the Affiant by�� he&46I v10(tual and, if mairiied, state whether the real property is or is not homestead property. If the drama&— titles being conveyed are located wholly within public right-of-way, the Affidavit should state ,1 t fact.] 5, Title to the subject drainage s tein(s) or to the County is not encumbere of record. II itle to the drainage system(s) oil; op I a; T s .. encumbered by the following rnstrL1L.e, s o► poi •tiot�(s} thei•eaf ai�dlar easement{s), if any, beij3g conveyer/ thereof and/or easements) being c©nveyed to the County is °ecord. 1. Mortgage (or Assignment of.,Ke eat a security interest against title tort ,conveyed to the County] to Mist n ` ne and recorded at C.R. Book i Pagf 2. UCC-I Financing Statement, recor0 Collier County. 3. UCC-i recorded with Florida Secret Book 11 , page to �'ro�ts} describe only recorded instruments that impress �tern(s) or partion(s) thereof andlar airy easement being i iortgagee(s)l , dated t seq., Public Records of Collier County. l O Book, Page _ , Public Records of Stab!,. yTallahassee (Leon County), Florida at O.R. ,aI '' ;,.. INSTRUCTION: The Affront must list each inert ` " si` al . n of rents and profits, iJCC-I (s)or other g 'It 11 security tlstrument that linpress a sec«iy interest tE�at could negatively affect conveyance of good title to the drainage.systern(s) or portion(s) thereof and/or easeiyiei ) ji ►Y, being conveyed to the County. If rnarke% le -title to the drainage system(s) or portion(s) thereof dfar oily easement(s) being conveyed is IF encumbered by any such recorded instrument, the Affiant shall 'd a the respective security instrument, including the book and fia t page where the security instrument has bee ,Tec orded. It is not necessary to 1.. attach a copy of any such document to the Affidavit, This Affidavit ;rod +sI s each security interest that is listed in the Owner's Affidavit, and each such security interest w. ,,..bb-bsubordinated..Do not list a ,. I\lotice of . Commencement or Reservation of �I'vlineral Rights, etc., bec, se :s�ich instruments do not negatively affect marketable .title to the drainage system(s) or portion(s) tl breof ` ndlor easements) bung coI onveyed to the County. If all of the drainage facilities being conveyed to t1 - I-ouy`°.. re located in public right-€�f way, do not list mortgages, etc., if they do not encumber after acquifg"ro_p that is located in public aright-af way. Claims asserted under Chapter 713, Florida Statutes, must be `firnserred to security?' pursuant to Section 713.24, Florida Statutes, or other adequate security acceptable_ to-`tl e unty Attomey st be provided to the County before the County will grant preliminary acc nee of title to such u nn foci lilies. 7. Affront further states that the information contained in this Affidavit is true, correct and curret�t as of the date this .Affidavit is given. [iNSfiRUC'I'IUiN: l.Jnless the time period is extended by staff far good cause ii1 the specif;e instance, per Ordinance, the date at'this A.ffidavEt should not be dated earlier than sixty (6a} days pri+�r to the subinittal Page 2 cif 3 OR 6045 PG 1904 of legal documents pertaining to Utility Conveyance to Cotner County, Engineering Services to conside� preliminary acceptalice of the subject drainage system(s) or Portion(s) thereof documents.] URTHE tF'i&NT S.AYFTH NAUGHT. ;,"." MMM Me P Me DATED this day of , 20 Attt�rneylAfftant's Simatur,,�`. ,sue. Attorney/Affiant's I�#arr3e`�:r.1� ��'- SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBEDr&r4b*r0*'fLIM MI Al n�e by means of 0 physical presence or d online notai•izafion, 'LF C. MMMMaMV* this day of �" t _ 20 by (name of attorney/affiiant making statement) who is ;....: �! personally known or 0 produced ��tv of Mentif cation roduced� as identification. Signature of Notary Public) '^,.;�� Printed or Typed Name eof Notary Public) R .> r, ` y one of rso re grin this instrument/ '' Prepared by.a..... Pe P p. g �.R th'. - [Address of person preparing this instrument] �: -- .; �*k_ . ^J: ff. o712021 Page 3 of 3 i �t1 F01'nt 4-Rev,OD (Utilities Facilities andlor Utilities Easemerrt(s} Subordination} ,:;,_ CLeave 3" space, b � nk space in upper tight hand comer for recording purposes] - � -. ; : V AA DRAIN -E. Yoe . 'ILITIES ANDICIR DRAINAGE + ASEI1El'�TT S SUBORDINATION J. _ 4 0 It At A +i THIS SUBDR.DIINATIO7, L :,dated this day of , Zo , by [Insert the complete and correct ILI rlalTl� of the Secure d P RIJ OF CO of the B C3A ty -see Instruction I�io. 11 (Hereinafter referred to as the "Secured €'arty"}, in favor IJI I ISSIONER.S OF COLLIER. COUNTY, FLORIDA, its successors I vt and assigns, {hereinafter• refer+e to as "County"}. as the context allows. .4 OIL Secured Patty as used herein includes singular or plural, V�ILREAS, the purpose of this Suba`�ti ,tort.;is to subordinate the Secured Parry's Security interests that encumber good, marketable title to'`thdY.1 Vtn_ bercd Drainage Eacilities andlor the related Drainage Easements} being conveyed to +Collier the underlying teal property that is enci s ecif ed in the below listed security instr and/ under 1�trl�i�ch Drainage. Facilities are located over, on y security interests in favor of the Secured Pa•ty asAAA wnI'11�EA, the Secured Party is the owner• a o.idet, of Rents and Profits, UCC- i *, etc. ], recorded in 0. J, to I�ublic Records of Collier County, Florida, [and i.� P recorded at O.R. Book, Page et seq., Public Recor [NOTE: *UCC- l s are usually subordinated by UCC-3s. County, insert the hook, Page and place (usually rI'allal UCC-3l. � a �,�ortgage or Assignment L cot•ds Book ,Page r, �e1, as amended by a r`+falliet• County, Florida.; and for UCC-3 is recorded outside of Collier SSE f tl recordation of each such UCC- IAA or V�IIEREA.S, the Secured Party is also the owner and bolder o�`'a-- ,recorded at O.R. gawk, page et seq,, Public Records of Collier Coun �iIflofida, as amended by a recorded at O.R. Book, Page ___R_ et, seq�,� ubli Records of Collier County, l lorida; and h �VI-iEREA.S, each above-t•eferenced Security tnstt•ttment grants to this Secp`�.cd.'pty,,a security Interest tat encumbers ood and tnarketal�le title to the Irlcumbered Drainage Facil`te� 3 g �cotiveyed to Collier g County, and/or encumbers the related Drainage Easer•nent(s), rtfany, also bettZgtAI;Ac,ney to Collier County, which Drainage Facilities have been constructed within such easement(s) and aisle tag fir,: n and/or over the . All underlying real property; and '. �. ; ,ILA 'ite to the conveyance of the Drainage Facilities anti/or related Drainage Easements, VVT3EI2 AS, prerequis ifany, being conveyed to the County, Collier County requires that this Secured Party must subordinate only its Security Interests in (i) the Encumbered Drainage Facilities being conveyed to the County and (ii) each related Drainage Easements}, if any, being conveyed to the County; and the Secured Party is hereby complying with said request for these subordination(s), 14 OVY, THEREFORE, in consideration of TE%I DOLLARS ($ I O.oO) and other goad and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged by the Secured Patty, the Secured Patty hereby subordinates its security+ interests in MU E KiLIM eI Drainage Facilities being conveyed to Collier County, andlor to each Drainage Easement(s), if any, being conveyed to the County, which encumbered Drainage Page 1 of 9 Facilities are located over, on andl viLI Ithe d%MOO I I ed underlying real property, l✓xcept as expressly subordinated lieren, the Secured interests of the Secured Party remain in full force and effect. IN WITNE EO' the Secured Party has causaed this Subordination to be executed the date and yeah first ai�ove �vt _correct witness at�d signature black - see Instruction No. 3� ledgtnent a.rtd notary block -see Insttuction h€o. �] prepared by: [Insert natne�aFI V49 IN CI�IU'T'E: Upon request, Caun,f taf,Nr. address of the individual who prepared this Subordittatian� n7�zoz t ovide examples of properly executed Sctbordinations�, Page 2 of 2 •p& •! .. IF A OF imxnlDli tz ;Ott- •�4 V FF T41 OF to 4 f For Ar OF FF f�roject: PARCEL: 1=olio No.: as "Grantor: , to whose mailing < Attorney, Suite It DRAIC�iAGE EASElU1ENT �MENT, made and entered into this day of $ 20, by , whose mailing address is , (hereinafter referred to COLLIER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, dress % is 3299 Tamiami Trail East, cIo the Office of the County i, aRs, Florida 34112 (hereinafter referred to as "Grantee"). ever use t �herei he terms "Grantor" and "Grantee" include all the parties to (Wher Ill this instrument an;th-eir,, �q,sectiv'e heirs, legal representatives, successors and assigns. Grantor and G' �, ale used for singular or plural, as the context requires.) to +°ollw;�IPIAW Teri l `I E S S E T t t to or - It r t '`� , Grantor, for and in con consideration paid by the Grt� acknowledged, hereby convey"; perpetual, non-exclusive drainage drainage structures and facilities, on "Of TEhI DOLLARS ($10.00) and other valuable 'he= receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby rt. #bargains and sells unto the Grantee, a m of o enter upon and to install and maintain p 1ui : �, not limited to ditches, berms ri -ra and retaining wall s s ur�erground pipes, and p p g y water control structures over, under,, u o nd :.,roes the following Collier Florida,to wit: ;w. located in y,. See attached Exhi incorporated herei Subject tc� easements, restrictions, a THIS HoluiESTEAD TO NA1lE AiyC TO H�3LD the same unto the Granteet#Q - �t la d and to lace and/or excavate malelow enter upon said n p constructing, operating, and maintaining drainage facilities,,._ thte includes the right to remove and use any and all excavated that r 6I. that Grantor has received full compensation for all impravern+�n easement area, including, but not limited to, . The eas-o, shall constitute an easement running with the land and shall burden above. swales, earthen various types of described lands �r with the right to �r the purpose of is easement Tie;parties record lava d within the e ' rated herein ll it e lams escribed Jlow IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has caused these presents to be execu�i date and year first above written. `'� , V1l1TNESSES: (Signature) (print Dame} (Signature) 0 (Print Name} W1l1TNESSES: Print Name` , STATE OF COUNTY OF l IF The foregoing Draina a E�as'd`ine-nt h sical presence or Lj online'. F` a by is persona produced identity. STATE t'� F COUN?'Y OF lly knqwn to me (affiX notarial seal) �.�s acknowledged before me by means of (� ;ion who day of , v. (Si (Prin# IV as proof of �`'o� �otary Public) ry Public} Serial l Carn�sior�: any}; My Cor�rnission fires. . -.. r: -IF The foregoing Draina a Easement vas acknowledged before 17 sical resence ar �] online notariaafion this day of , r me ■ is personally known to me _. praduce� as proof of identity. (affix notarial seas) {Signature of Notary Public) (Print Name of Notary Public) Serial I Gornrnission # cif anyj: Gash Revised: 06/26/18 k* oR 6045 PG 1910 *** Approued as to form and �egati#y: Assistartou Attorney a ;t '. k eve t t iu'iy Camrriission expires: Lest �tevlsed: t}5f26l18 UL+= Growth Management Community Development Department Please complete the following and upload via the CityView Portal with your submittal. Items marked with (*jolt; required for every application, other items are optional and may not apply to every project. Forms are valid for 6 months following their submittal; an updated form will be required for a new submittal after that timeframe and any time the properties within the project boundary are modified. Additional documents may be attached to this form and can include: * LOCATION MAP and/or SURVEY showing the proposed project boundary. List of additional folio numbers and associated legal descriptions. E-mail from Addressing Official for any pre -approved project and/or street names. *FOLIO (Property ID) Numbers) of subject property or properties. [Attach list if necessary] 37742840009,37744000009 & 37742880001 *LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties. [Attach list if necessary] Section 27, Township 48S, Range 27E STREET ADDRESS(ES) where applicable, if already assigned. 37742880001 - 13062 Immokalee Road Acceptance of this form does not constitute project and/or street name approval and is subject to further review by the Addressing Official. Pre -Approval may be requested by contacting us at GMD_Addressing�colliercountyfl.gov or 239-252-2482 prior to your submittal. CURRENT PROJECT NAME Immokalee Randall CPUD PROPOSED STREET NAME(s) LATEST APPROVED PROJECT NUMBER [e.g., SDP-94-##, PPL-2002-AR-####, PL2017000####] Addressing Checklist (Rev 10/2022) Operations &Regulatory Management Division • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive •Naples, FL 34104 • 239-252-2400 www.colliercountyfl.gov Page 1 of 1 Parcel No ' 37742840009 Name /Address GM ADVISORS LLC 434 TERRACINA CT City ;NAPLES C Alier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Site _._._..._1......."..._.....too ;...—__..._.._ a4.__....._......_.._.........I Site City NAPLES State FL Site Zone *Note 34120 Zip 34119 i Map No. Strap No. � Section Township Range Acres *Estimated _ ........ too ._..._...._.._..........._..r..........._.._......_..................._.........._..........._.._....._..._......_...._..............._......................................._................._._.,..........................._......._....._....._......................._......_..._.._.............._...._..........................._1....._...........i 3C27 332800 35 03C27 27 48 27 2.9 ..............r.........._..........................._...............__...................................._..............._.._................,........._..........._.._... .._..............._.........._..............._.._....,.._................................................................................._.. .........................................................................................................._.................._................................................................_............._. _...................I....1.1.............I.1......1 _ _......._... _. _....... Legal GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 23 TR 35 LESS THAT PORTION FOR R/W DESC IN OR 3100 PG 2570 0014allo _................................_.._..............._.........._.._...................................................................._.............._.........._..._............................,...................................._.............................._...................._..................._.............................................._............. .........................._.................. ! Sub./Condo ? 332800 - GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 23 ,........_ . ..... .^1 ... . Use Code 0 ; 0 - VACANT RESIDENTIAL Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Millage Area 0 11290 Millage Rates t1M *Calculations School � Other Total i 4.459 8.7542 i 13.2132 lott"I ........... _.. .................. ........._........... :..._..............._.........................._ ..1................;..._....I......._.....'It .............. _..4.4.... .. ............�. ..... 2022 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Date hook -Page � Amount 04/30/20 5758-1422 $ 260,000 03/09/98 ` 2395-3318 $ 20,500 Land Value (+) Improved Value (_) Market Value (-) 10% Cap (_) Assessed Value (_) School Taxable Value (_) Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll $ 139,200 $0 $ 139,200 $ 48,285 $ 90,915 $ 139,200 $ 90,915 Collier County Property Appraiser ............................... Parcel No ; 37744000009 ress 'GM ADVISORS LLC j 434 TERRACINA CT City � NAPLES Map No. 3C27 ................................................................... Strap No. 332800 53 03C27 Property Summary Site City NAPLES Section 27 State FL ...........................0.I.91111................._....I.I..................I...... Township Range .._......__ ........................ ... ......... _;........................._........._...._.._.._................. ......... 48 27 Site Zane *Nate 34120 Zip 34119 Acres *Estimated ..................................._..v ......_.......... ......................................................................................................................... 3.75 Legal GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 23 TR 53 LESS THAT PORTION FOR R/W DESC IN OR 3100 PG 2577 .................................................................._......................._......to ....._........_............................................_..........................................._.,...at ......_.................................................._..............._..................._.._................to ........................,........,...._.._..........................................................._............................� ......__.._.._.....__.._.................... _...".................................._._.......................................................1-11111. _I I .....I. 4.1111.. ._.. I . Millage Area f j 290 Millage Rates 0 *Calculations ! Sub./Condo 1332800 - GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 23 School Other Total _ . Use Code 0' 0 at VACANT RESIDENTIAL 4.459 E 8.7542 ! 13*2132 Date 01/17/20 12/27/19 09/22/97 ` 10/01/78 Latest Sales History 2022 Certified Tax Roll (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) (Subject to Change) .. 4 1. Ill, ..._......_ ......_........__..._....._ ._... 4..._.......................................V ............._ .........._........ _.._...... .. ........ ..........._.............I.._ ..........................._.._..........._........................... I.........._....to ... 'It ._............ _..............._..........__...._... IV. ..._...I ..........._......... Book -Page Amount Land Value 57.9-1011 $ 0 (+) Improved Value 57121wV54*7 $ 3500000 (_) Market Value 2348-2582 $ 24,000 775-1651 $ 0 () 10% Cap (_) Assessed Value (=) School Taxable Value (_) Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll $ 165,220 $0 $ 165,220 $ 57,266 $ 107,954 $ 165,220 $ 107,954 Parcel No ; 37744000009 ress 'GM ADVISORS LLC j 434 TERRACINA CT City � NAPLES Map No. 3C27 ................................................................... Strap No. 332800 53 03C27 Property Summary Site City NAPLES Section 27 State FL ...........................0.I.91111................._....I.I..................I...... Township Range .._......__ ........................ ... ......... _;........................._........._...._.._.._................. ......... 48 27 Site Zane *Nate 34120 Zip 34119 Acres *Estimated ..................................._..v ......_.......... ......................................................................................................................... 3.75 Legal GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 23 TR 53 LESS THAT PORTION FOR R/W DESC IN OR 3100 PG 2577 .................................................................._......................._......to ....._........_............................................_..........................................._.,...at ......_.................................................._..............._..................._.._................to ........................,........,...._.._..........................................................._............................� ......__.._.._.....__.._.................... _...".................................._._.......................................................1-11111. _I I .....I. 4.1111.. ._.. I . Millage Area f j 290 Millage Rates 0 *Calculations ! Sub./Condo 1332800 - GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 23 School Other Total _ . Use Code 0' 0 at VACANT RESIDENTIAL 4.459 E 8.7542 ! 13*2132 Date 01/17/20 12/27/19 09/22/97 ` 10/01/78 Latest Sales History 2022 Certified Tax Roll (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) (Subject to Change) .. 4 1. Ill, ..._......_ ......_........__..._....._ ._... 4..._.......................................V ............._ .........._........ _.._...... .. ........ ..........._.............I.._ ..........................._.._..........._........................... I.........._....to ... 'It ._............ _..............._..........__...._... IV. ..._...I ..........._......... Book -Page Amount Land Value 57.9-1011 $ 0 (+) Improved Value 57121wV54*7 $ 3500000 (_) Market Value 2348-2582 $ 24,000 775-1651 $ 0 () 10% Cap (_) Assessed Value (=) School Taxable Value (_) Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll $ 165,220 $0 $ 165,220 $ 57,266 $ 107,954 $ 165,220 $ 107,954 Collier County Property App Property Summary Parcel No: 37742880001 Site A dress 13062 IMMOKALEE RD _.._......._.._.._..._......_.........._......_..._..___........................................................................._.._.............._..............._..........*Disclai►ner,......................................................._.............._.......».._......._......_............._..............., _..........._......._.._.._......._._..........'........_................_._..........................._..............._.............................................................................................._..........._......_..........._................................_..........._......._.._..............................._......_......._.._....................... Name AddressCOLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S8 raiser Site City NAPLES Site Zane *Note 34120 . ...._............................_.._......._.._.._.._........._.................._.to........_._............_.........._........................ _......I...... I.... ..............._..............-................... ...................... ...... ......... ...... _ ............._........... _.........................._..I................................................._.............._........._.................. _..........._.............._...._.._............._.................................._.... City NAPLES State FL Zip 34104-4961 It II +64 o ...»..........................._..........................._....................._............................_................................................... ........................_..........._..............................................._I........... _.._......_. .._.._..... .,....... ,......... II1.................. ..._.. ......_.. ..... ..... .. ... .. Map No. ' Strap No. Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3C27 332800 36 3C27 27 48 27 3979 _...,........•._............ __.........._...................................._..................................... _...........I....... I ...........4........................_..... _._.....__..............._..............._.........................._....................................._....................................................._.............._.......".........................................................»..I............. . _... . Legal GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 23 TR 36 _....._..............._........ .......... ........ _....._........_ ._...--_ ... 1.11.....1_ ........ _ ...._ ._ ........_ .._......._............................_.................... __.......... .. . ............ ...:. Millage Area 01290 Millage Rates 0 *Calculations i ..................._.............._.............I.1............. Sub./Condo 1332800 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 23 School Other ; Total Use Code 0 86 - COUNTIES INCLUDING NON -MUNICIPAL GOV. 1 4.459 8.7542 13.2132 Latest Sales History 2022 Certified Tax Roll (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) (Subject to Change) ._.._......._ ..................................... »......... _.......__»._........._.._......__....,.....»..._..._...._.....,....................»......._.......... ........_......._.... ......_ ....._._.........._ ......_.................._.................................._.......4._I ......................... ......... ....... ... DateBook -Page � Amount � .. ......._..........n........._.........................._................__._............................_........_..181,920 . -.... ` Lad Value $ f � ... 08/30/02 3100-2570 $ 0 ' O ue Improved Val $ 0 03/16/98 2398-1355 i $ 20,0 _ 00 _ _ 1 () Market Value 181,920 02/01 /74 731-645 $ 0 _ _ ... - (-) 10% Cap $ 127,407 1 (_) Assessed Value E $ 54,513 (_) School Taxable Value $ 0 (_) Taxable Value 0'• If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll I ' , il hh ",A!x k ka to r�. AISM9 ` r�oiAIAo i, d A t .t„€' v t "III i t 1 iof 0AA 1 w k;� d' ,rr:if 4+�,.. ,' s,� iFeA ,, A* g•yr or r fit' :;ro 3. ' r '%yt� yJ a, ;l Vkfo o. '° a ' ,, Uc } , e `: I,�: '" ''b"•#"s ° of g i. skr' f >,. �'sx 6� , 5" tY'€rAw f" KA k' sol of R F 4'IV rI r �" ir t . , t FAt A ,,. �,v . s+'fy zi 3 ,I I,to VIArrD�i aIF, a I Y s t I tok iP "0'N^ y1 tr ` j il r t i ,t$I Is { Ma _ r i to • r f ., 4 1 4� s, i ,`.. # i. a .t ` $y"x n " A r. 4 , A t` Z T} .a 1 t. Dtoo - At V$ < t ' of : ata D •"h DS F'. t *y . s , it tt I It a, €a9., A. ,roe "a;<� :' J, 5- 4I `�' i A t: l 4Q, . 1 Ali III A r%ra ,r 4P** `4s }a.. '`'tt 41 M r *• ,A, �:Ty€ `;€ a, v A AI " r _.- :,. .1 _AA ' �` - �� " a.11 �' * ' ,�,4, 0 `' iA ", Itoa f} l y a y x s 4 .t'+' , v Al I to I z } 8or 4� } f .. ' t 1 , I I I k of I.I t ,.►. ., r... s _ FAtAl ,d D�;VA `oI ' tF arm'€ 4 , v Q Y i ,A I rat'. g. All Y ,4 k eI i J f» €,.$`"OPe"A Y ;"� r- _.� iA,mVH r sDr I 4 a x,I , ,4•, to A 1 I7* Vol Vol h IQ ' >rtoo, 11 r A A el' of sriF r, " rit ` ;; ram 4 ANa s 1 ?� k 'r •:i I, �.y r k k All • t < n S" * tom. € Yt . ,,.�, m I to '� 5' ' III ,ryv�... I_T 3V Aix 11 , 0 A ) lo � * A I to, A I I - A; I � I 0 A o�!V Q I �� t� 4� .+ a x w{ ,k '" + e vw s-yr� 4 a I,�; 11 xVol r 4'` r c. ', r �. 4 .g t+ t o s to f i I `4 t r ; v N *! xe^ f`Av Rv or A % `t S i11 ' 14o 1 'r +7' I � x I r A { s } „+ f a 4 it xf Af 1i +" 4 At �; #h% trD yto "x��i „yc ..? . A , . n , ffi err j ... o- 4.mrE ✓ 4�":pme, +At e ,'a 11 41 it > ; e.,� , F S% ` t o :{�4" k ,; s• c w` t ft .. ,"' �e' y 6 •e ,w. Z �f ; 2< y - ttAo t '. f f`At WA,Aw A too, Al IA AtIt tAt VIA .try. apw.� g 1»¢�P a t "F011 Y :n r #y.:s3 ' i. " A 8; S, t L y , »: 0 to t.a ... �,, , A I A r-�'r'fi6""`f§ '8g'�' ' ';. a D } :"d y ;, {1. . Y- ac +y' £< a� - Ato °s " "'A € .r,Yk 3�{ r' r,.cc..er<,.§€� *yam y h ... 4#js 4 !:P t,`' ' V r '6 tkf ik f .f� 56 tot s Al .'€'� Dtilsti �. 'xiL'=.r: 33'.sr�*s� ^' .✓ it Ali ft AAA or ` I t I+ '. q hflt'�g 4.a .ems '=r' .i!* , s,4 t Pe o •o% »I :'*" 60, � � sty, y ' W r k s{ .e+� F, r. ',. ,� ..IT t ,• 1r IV 4 'IYk t A k. lot + t r 11 r °i x t .' y Al At i A t 'st r If It* r A AAl t �_ A ,,, •' 4 iz ti i - - € r tI tll t t il too 10 SS � , v t. nv rr o s �f V T•; t t k 7. At Y oa + r jy {'}j, +..Ito� t ; r F h r t y,s s I .'•3 IV IV ; f r Y 1 tin t,. It a F % A. l 1 �{» AAA » . a• , I t Fg I .. , • " III y { - 4 At I ��'iX rr','.• _ t t D I . " �: r,<+ ,F" e r 3 "1. 4 ` € D` x A ? I le I � ,4 0 Q� A A A f I P, t , f � I 0 AA I I I A A A I (A , ao 14L I A il 94 q3L:A.A*%Wv ,,*A , 4- ,AAA A I l I I I I q 0 A It , A ' • i t . �€ r I ; r At A A : . A A A A 1 4 i if I I I . io� ,I A li I k.ro "e r.,.A"6, _ , , fyy , ' 4.4 Y Il o 11 y �{i ' If A. ..Alto W.r,.k.. __.�.G....e,f543e ioo45:v..... Al vv. AI ... {wrt s.�"'"—`..�...F iMa.I! IV ._ .tom(�. x ,�E . ag n. ,. 4.vY^.v�9 .4/�� W n y „ x 9 r 4 EPt • , t t 1 , r 1 ,� � � � '.DPI�.'� ��� 4 r , fr S r� D84 / if �` .' D1 f7s'€fix- I it " !U ilioommoSrI `4 ytl s ulgiAlo�, r". :r t k i' �' ', Ei- A $ i s t t . �F �" ''"� �' All, 4 At ? + �. 4 04•AS. IV f ' ' r y. a 4t 3C 0. t t .l , §i > • • r-.. 18 m g . ' r".. ;1 s 5 8 e lo A Al :.. xr fi 'r tj ,� rat r,, t£ `4 % ,,gg t� ., 'f 4 f y r Ir t .�'"t $_ is r to dt' ar<a`.a`,a •3^ j r s_. �r mm►c 9 �t� 7 j�A II A P 4 x $ r I y am y�. Ator ,4 , ' 3s°x .«. D.?.rr.,�k. { •.;�At ;k'$r�1. 3 F r .. Ate. y �+A At > At I of A ; . j.. I a 4 3Al Q 4IV M, k If } i N Fit r 'k a" . f + G 4 . 4 `dOv Al !• N v I t z fr fto,• io^. .4 ..r. D 4 x. A, A 4A r ,� 1 •, At .;r. tI: , I �� ?� t Ou ts... 4't < * f A. I r-z.,_r��s. Rk "#...,AT'�ff�^��#• .:� y}w "` Pr,F'at�'f�i i W I lopol Tj . 1 APPLICATION FOR A REQUEST TO AMEND THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN APPLICATION NUMBER DATE RECEIVED PRE -APPLICATION CONFERENCE DATE DATE SUFFICIENT This application, with all required supplemental data and information, must be completed and accompanied by the appropriate fee, and returned to the Growth Management Department, Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104. 239-252- 2400. The application must be reviewed by staff for sufficiency within 30 calendar days following the filing deadline before it will be processed and advertised for public hearing. The applicant will be notified in writing, of the sufficiency determination. If insufficient, the applicant will have 30 days to remedy the deficiencies. For additional information on the processing of the application, see Resolution 97-431 as amended by Resolution 98-18 (both attached) . If you have any questions, please contact the Comprehensive Planning Section at 239-252-2400. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS I. GENERAL INFORMATION A. Name of Applicant Michel M. Saadeh, MGR Company GM Advisors, LLC Address 434 Terracina Court City Naples State FL Phone Number N/A Name of Applicant Collier Coun Fax Number N Zip Code 341 19 Transportation Right-of-Wa Address 2885 Horseshoe Drive South City Naples State FL Zip Code 34104 Phone Number N/A B. Name of Agent Robert J. MUlhere, F Fax Number N/A for Vi • THIS WILL BE THE PERSON CONTACTED FOR ALL BUSINESS RELATED TO THE PETITION. Company He M olontes Address 950 Enco An Compan City Naples State Florida Phone Number 239-254-2( Zip Code 341 10 Fax Number 239-254-2099 C. Name of Owner (s) of Record See Exhibit "I.C" Warranty D D. Name, Address and Qualifications of additional planners, architects, engineers, environmental consultants and other professionals providing information contained in this application. 1 H:\2023\2023025\WP\GMPA\Resubmittal\SSGMPA Application (rev 7-25-2023).doc Norman J. TrebilCOCk, AICP, P.E., President Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, P.A. 1205 Piper Blvd., Suite 202, Naples, FL 34110 Telephone: 239-566-9551 Email: ntrebilcock@trebilcock.biz Nicholas Pearson, Senior Biologist Turrell Hall & Associates, Inc. 3584 Exchange Avenue Naples, FL 34104 Telephone: 239-643-0166 Email: Nick@thanaples.com Russ Weyer, President Real Estate Econometrics, Inc. 707 Orchid Drive, Suite 100 Naples, FL 34102 Telephone: 239-269-1341 Email: Rweyer@ree-i.com II. Disclosure of Interest Information: See attached Disclosure of Interest Form A. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, Tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest. (Use additional sheets if necessary). Name and Address Percentage of Ownership B. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each. Name and Address Percentage of Stock C. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest. Name and Address Percentage of Interest D. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners. Name and Address Percentage of Ownership E. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners. Not Applicable Name and Address Date of Contract: 2 H:\2023\2023025\WP\GMPA\Resubmittal\SSGMPA Application (rev 7-25-2023).doc Percentage of Ownership F. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust. Not Applicable Name and Address G. Date subject property acquired (X): 1 /17/20, 4/30/20, 8/30/02 Term of lease yrs./mos. If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate date of option: and date option terminates: , or anticipated closing: H. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. III. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: A. LEGAL DESCRIPTION See Exhibit "I.C" Warranty Deeds B. GENERAL LOCATION South of Immokalee Rd. Immokalee Rd & Randall Blvd C. PLANNING COMMUNITY Rural Estates E. SIZE IN ACRES 9.84± imately rox773 ft west of the intersection of D . TAZ 2729 F. ZONING Estates G. SURROUNDING LAND USE PATTERN See Exhibit "V.B.I " Future Land Use Map H. FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESI(',NATIONS) Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP), Rural Estates Sub -Element, Estates Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict IV. TYPE OF REQUEST: A. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN ELEMENT (S) TO BE AMENDED: Housing Element Recreation/Open Space Traffic Circulation Sub -Element Mass Transit Sub -Element Aviation Sub -Element Potable Water Sub -Element Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element NGWAR Sub -Element Solid Waste Sub -Element Drainage Sub -Element Capital Improvement Element CCME Element Future Land Use Element X Golden Gate Master Plan Immokalee Master Plan B. AMEND PAGE(S) iii and 17 — AS FOLLOWS: Use Strikee thr�1 �rh to identify language to be deleted; Use Underline to identify language to be added). Attach additional pages if necessary: See Exhibit "IV.B.1" GMP Text Amendment C. AMEND FUTURE LAND USE MAP(S) DESIGNATION FROM Residential Estates Subdistrict to Immokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict D. AMEND OTHER MAP (S) AND EXHIBITS AS FOLLOWS: See Exhibit "IV.D. l " Immokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict E. DESCRIBE ADDITIONAL CHANGES REQUESTED: N/A 3 H:\2023\2023025\WP\GMPA\Resubmittal\SSGMPA Application (rev 7-25-2023).doc V. REQUIRED INFORMATION: NOTE: ALL AERIALS MUST BE AT A SCALE OF NO SMALLER THAN I"=400'. At least one copy reduced to 8-1/2 x 1 1 shall be provided of all aerials and/or maps. A. LAND USE Exh. V.A. ] Provide general location map showing surrounding developments (PUD, Exh. V.A.2 DRI's, existing zoning) with subject property outlined. Provide most recent aerial of site showing subject boundaries, source, and date. Exh. V.A.3 Provide a map and summary table of existing land use and zoning within a radius of 300 feet from boundaries of subject property. Exh. V.B.1 Provide map of existing Future Land Use Designations) of subject property and adjacent lands, with acreage totals for each land use designation on the subject property. C. ENVIRONMENTAL Exh. V.C.1 Provide most recent aerial and summary table of acreage of native habitats and soils occurring on site. HABITAT IDENTIFICATION MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH THE FDOT-FLORIDA LAND USE, COVER AND FORMS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (FLUCCS CODE). NOTE: THIS MAY BE INDICATED ON SAME AERIAL AS THE LAND USE AERIAL IN "A" ABOVE. Exh. V.C.2 Provide a summary table of Federal (US Fish & Wildlife Service) and State (Florida Game & Freshwater Fish Commission) listed plant and animal species known to occur on the site and/or known to inhabit biological communities similar to the site (e.g. panther or black bear range, avian rookery, bird migratory route, etc.) . Identify historic and/or archaeological sites on the subject property. D. GROWTH MANAGEMENT Reference 9J-11.006, F.A.C. and Collier County's Capital Improvements Element Policy 1.1.2 (Copies attached). l . INSERT "Y" FOR YES OR "N" FOR NO IN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING: N Is the proposed amendment located in an Area of Critical State Concern? (Reference 9J-11.006(1) (a) (5), F.A.C.). If so, identify area located in ACSC. N Is the proposed amendment directly related to a proposed Development of Regional Impact pursuant to Chapter 380 F.S. ? (Reference 9J-1 1.006(1) (a)7.a, F.A.C.) N Is the proposed amendment directly related to a proposed Small Scale Development Activity pursuant to Subsection 163.3187 (1)(c), F.S. ? (Reference 9J-1 1.006(1) (a)7.b, F.A.C.) N Does the proposed amendment create a significant impact in population which is defined as a potential increase in County -wide population by more than 5% of population projections? (Reference Capital Improvement Element Policy 1.1.2). If yes, indicate mitigation measures being proposed in conjunction with the proposed amendment. Exh. V.D.I Does the proposed land use cause an increase in density and/or intensity to the uses permitted in a specific land use designation and district identified (commercial, industrial, etc.) or is the proposed land use a new land use designation or district? (Reference Rule 9J-5.006(5) F.A.C.). If so, provide data and analysis to support the suitability of land for the proposed use, and of environmentally sensitive land, ground water and natural resources. (Reference Rule 9J-1 1.007, F.A.C.) 4 H:\2023\2023025\WP\GMPA\Resubmittal\SSGMPA Application (rev 7-25-2023).doc E. PUBLIC FACILITIES I. Exh. V.E.I Provide the existing Level of Service Standard (LOS) and document the Exh. V.E.I Exh. V.E.I Exh. V.E.3 Exh. V.E.I Exh. V.E.I Exh. V.E.I impact the proposed change will have on the following public facilities: Potable Water Sanitary Sewer Arterial & Collector Roads; Name specific road and LOS See TIS Drainage Solid Waste Parks: Community and Regional If the proposed amendment involves an increase in residential density, or an increase in intensity for commercial and/or industrial development that would cause the LOS for public facilities to fall below the adopted LOS, indicate mitigation measures being proposed in conjunction with the proposed amendment. (Reference Capital Improvement Element Objective 1 and Policies) 2. Exh. V.E.2 Provide a map showing the location of existing services and public facilities that will serve the subject property (i.e. water, sewer, fire protection, police protection, schools and emergency medical services. 3. Exh. V.E.I Document proposed services and public facilities, identify provider, and describe the effect the proposed change will have on schools, fire protection and emergency medical services. F. OTHER Identify the following areas relating to the subject property: Exh. V.F.I Flood zone based on Flood Insurance Rate Map data (FIRM). N Location of wellfields and cones of influence, if applicable. (Identified on Collier County Zoning Maps) N Traffic Congestion Boundary, if applicable N Coastal Management Boundary, if applicable N High Noise Contours (65 LDN or higher) surrounding the Naples Airport, if applicable (identified on Collier County Zoning Maps) . G. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION N $16,700.00 non-refundable filing fee made payable to the Board of County Commissioners due at time of submittal. (Plus proportionate share of advertising costs) Y $9,000.00 non-refundable filing fee for a Small Scale Amendment made payable to the Board of County Commissioners due at time of submittal. (Plus proportionate share of advertising costs) Y Proof of ownership (copy of deed) Y Notarized Letter of Authorization if Agent is not the Owner (See attached form) Y I Original and 5 complete, signed applications with all attachments including maps, at time of submittal. After sufficiency is completed, 25 copies of the complete application will be required. * If you have held apre-application meeting and paid the pre -application fee of $500.00 at the meeting, deduct that amount from the above application fee amount when submitting your application. All pre -application fees are included in the total application submittal fee. Otherwise * Maps shall include: North arrow, name and location of principal roadways and shall be at a scale of 1" = 400' or at a scale as determined during the pre -application meeting. 5 H:\2023\2023025\WP\GMPA\Resubmittal\SSGMPA Application (rev 7-25-2023).doc ZLERK OF •URT AND COMPTROLLER • •/ 111 11 5/1/2020 4:00 PM PAGES 3 COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA This deed prepared by; Robert Rogers, Esq. 75 linevards Blvd, Na p es PL 34119 OF oo ..,. 'Are PArcet tD Number: 37742 AAt ctual consideration paid is S 2 • This Indenture, Elvin Torres, a marri of the Count}of Cook GM Advisors LLC, a EXHIBIT I.0 y of April , 2 0 2 0 A.D. , I3et�veen and Pascual Torres, a married. man Florida' ;`im twe ted state of liability whose address is: 4 3 4 Terraeina Ct . , -r`�. �:N Footit ' I. 4 of the County of Collier ''; .*e ::w,,. Witnesseth that the GRANTORS, for and in consideration 6e e;:sul.) .of: DOL VS FL 34119 and other good and valuable consideration to t; RANTORS in °pia}�d / '�: granted, bargained and said to the said CJRANTEC and GRANTEC'� heirs, li 4. Illinois company scare of Florida grantors, gx-antee. and ��_,..._..._____.........._................_....____ DOLLARS, GRANTCE, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, have tctssors and assigns forever, the following described land, situate, lying and being in the County of`5tlate of Florida to wit: No. 23, according to the ;� 9 , Public Records of :+o road right-of-way Vie` `2570, Public Records of AAA ti•. all tenements, hereditaments a appurtenances thereto in anywise appertaining . t',=JE;;_' ti . TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the same in fee simple fore-wv•r--,.�, I'16Y Subject to current taxes, easements and restrictit�ns�f, `'record. A .Y • -;4.. I r E SUBJECT TO ad valorem and non -ad valorem real property' t, , s subsequent to 2020, zoning, building code and other use srictions imposed by governmental authority; outstanding oil, gas,=anc� mineral interests of records, if any; and restrictions, reservations and easements common to the subdivision; provided, however, that none of them shall prevent the use of the property for residential purposes. All of Tract 35, plat thereof as Collier County, Golden Gate Estates, ''�ti- recorded in Plat Book -?,,.`• Florida, LESS that porn to 11 described in Official Records Book 3100 Collier County, Florida. TOGETHER with belonging or Grantor warrants that at the time of this conveyance, the property is not the Grantor's homestead within the meaning in the constitution of the state of Florida, nor is it con or a part of homestead property, (Continued on Attached} subject set forth tiguous to and the grantors do hereby fully warrant tl7e title to said land, and will defend the same against lawful claims of all ne�ons �vhamsaever. l.ay�r(icncr�ucd by y� L>ist�lny Systems, �f1C,. 2(1?U (Rl�3) 7G3-5ii5 Form I�111'[)-.', oR 5758 PG 1423 Warranty Deed _ rage a Parcel ID Number: 37742840009 In 'Witness Whe Signed, s Printed Name: Witnes tors hove hereunto set their bands and se:�ls the clay and r presence: COUNTY OF al ! fir' The foregoing instnu»ent was acknowledged before m�'<134 ,4`i notarization, this 3 0 th day of Apri 1 Elvin Torres, a married man and`4 who have produced their Notary Public State of Fionda Wendy M Humphrey My Cammiss[on GG 959958 Expires 02/19/2024 Torres dress: 332 first .1bov�.� written. nsueola Ave., Chicago, Pascual Torres` l'.O. Address: 3327 W Pensacola Ave., Chicago, IL 60618 physical presence or Torres, a married .: 5 `:�MIu�r4fnu.�hMT/�� l GMA-DTOF2R Lax�rt;�»urntcd by �_' [:)i�ph�y �iystcros, lnc., �t)?Il (R���i) 7G;�-SijS harm f��.Wt>-? rr* OR 5758 PG 1424 *** Warranty veeu "Page 3 P�rcel ID Number: 37742840009 LasrrCitncrt+ted by �.' L)i,)�►ny Svtitrtm, Inc.. FU?U (Kf,a) 7f+.i-iij3 f���rtn 1�11�'U-_' INSTR 5818503 OR 5719 CLERK PG OF • . F• ! $0.70 i • 1 /1 1011 RECORDED 1/22/2020 1:11 PM PAGES 2 AND COMPTROLLER, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA 'Y'his Documtnt Prepared by; Robert Rogers, Esq. 75 Vineyards Blvd, Napples FL 3411TIN 9 t239j 353wl973 lip Nil IN Parctl 1D Numbtr: 332 op, Quitclaim This Quitclaim Deed, RCAMS Advisers, ,9I t12 ,- Made this day of , A.D.pit , LLC , - 1`°rich limited liability company of the County of Collier GM Advisors, LLC, a State of Florida Florin, -_� ' ted li.abila.ty company �N ,4I '44fI. " - Ott whose address is: 7 6 7 5 SANTA MARCHER T,A4 4A. Naples, FL 34109 of the County of C011xex - - `�<: Witnesseth that the GRANTOR, for and in Ofwli si>�rri ,a:,, _r►ir.rww_ww_____www.rww�w_wTEN DOL ' '. � and other good and valuable consideration to GRANTOR lhand. p ai granted, bargained and quitclaimed to the said GRANTEE and GRArpi I l S t` Florida State of Between grantor, grantee. 1 oI �ww__wwwww...w DOLLARS by GRANTEE, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has ems, successors and assigns forever, the following described land, situate, g County INN' --X. - lying and bean in the Coun of j= State of Florida to wit: All of Tract 53, Golden Gate Estate`,;.°t No. 23, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book ? .;; ,..ge 9 , of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, LWNS . EXCEPTING THEREFROM that parcel described in Order of Taking as ,:.. e*��d ook 3100 Page 2577 PublicRecordsof . "0`411 PO dinOfficialRecords r County, Florida. To Have and to Hold the same together with all and singular the appurtenances thereunto belonging or appertaining, and all the estate, right, title, interest, lien, equity and claim whatsoever of grantor, either in law the use, benefit and profit of the said grantee forever. Laser Generated by 0 Display Systems, Inc , 2020 (863) 763NN Form FLQCD-2 in anywise or equity, for k * OR 5719 PG 1012 *** Quitclaim Deed _Page z Parcel ID Number: 332$00533C27 In Witness Where 7 t gin .:, Prin Wi to Printed Name Witness has hereunto set its hand and seal the day and year first above written. ur presence: STATE QF Florida �' CQUNTY %JF Collier The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before Michel Saadeh, MGR of RCAMS company who is personatiy known to me or who has produced his Flori RC,AMS Advisers, LLC, a Florida limited Liability company P.O. Address: 434 Ttrraclna Ct., Naples, F�. 34l 19 day of `✓ a� � by LLC , a F1ori.da 1=i u ted liability Y p • DE'NA L. WALTCNACK • ` . rotary Public - State of Florida t `11 LOMMISSfon a GG 220204 • .'.,.....,.. Y Comm. Expires May 21, 2022 }"0 qpdihrOA h National Notary Assn. F `. 4 GMADV2 SORSDEED Laser Generated by C Display Systems, inc., 2020 (8b3) 763-SSSS Form FLQCD-2 i i i i 1Will I ' • 11 OWN 1 ♦0 1 m I I1 6h`GIhEERS I LhN�SC�PE P�GHf 1EC i S l PLIr'ER3 I SU�I�V�RS 950 Encore Way Naples, FL 34110 Phone: (239) 254-2000 Florida Certificate of Authorization Number: 1772 www.holemontes.com EXHIBIT IV.D.1 GMA COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT CHECKED BY JAC DRAWN BY MSK DATE 4 PROJECT No. 2023.025 CAD FILE NAME: GMPA EXHIBIT —ITEM INSET SUBJECT SITE IMAGE 2023 PER GOGGLE MAPS SUBJECT SITE 0 2ao aoo sca�E iu � i mmolca�ee Rd 3 Orangetrec �4 i . Rand•11.Btvd- � Y____ . - PROJECT LOCATION MAP SCALE: 1" = 3000' - LIMITS OF SUBJECT SITE 6 0 N N a 3 O Cit.C3 Qm)I CZJ CN AERIAL PER MAPPING DATA SERVICE 2023 � ate' - • -- .-�vr' _� . _-- i to too IA war �'It , \ \ �t, EXHIBIT V.A.2 SUBJECT SITE AERIAL OVERLAY � 100 200 SCALE IN FEET LIMITS OF - SUBJECT SITE LETTER I REVISIONS 0ATE IMMOKALEE RANDALL COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT 9( 9� PROP ERTY EXISTING LAND USE ZON IN G Vacant: collier County E SUBJECT SITE Stormwater management Across Immoka lee Rd. va cant NORTH and single family residential E SOH single-family residential E Across canal, North Collier EAST E (CU) Fire Rescue District WEST Vacant E 0 200 400 SCALE IN FEET - LIMITS OF SUBJECT SITE DESIGN ED 9Y DATE � THESE DRA\MNGS ARE NOT REFER ENCE NO. DRAWING NO. J.A.C. 4 2�23 APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION DRAWiJ 8V DATE � 550 Encore Way Naples, FL 34110 UNLESS SIGNED 9ELOW 2023.025 . p 3 Phone: (239) 254-2D00 EXHIBIT V . A . 3 GMP�.DWG CHECKED 8Y DATE Florida Certficate of Authorization PROJECT NO. SHEET NO. H.�1. 4 2023 HOLE MONTES Number: 1772 ZONING MAP I� (� V ERTICAL SCALE HORIZONTAL SCALE vAvw. hole monteS.CDrn DATE 2023.025 3 OF v 9G k IYi (I UI:ViH WA H R I P AN kv5151v.lem AGRICULTURAL/RURAL DESIGNATION a i ESTATES DESIGNATION Rural Settlement Area District - LIMITS OF SUBJECT SITE SCALE IN FEET Th^ Club at Twin Bonita Bay fast SUBJECT SITE Olde Florida Golf Club J IR'mpkelca Rd PUBLIC SERVICE FACILITIES NOTES COLLIER COUNTY CORKSCREW SHERIFF OFFICE MIDDLE 1. POLICE PROTECTION IS PROVIDED BY COLLIER COUNTY SHERIFF'S SCHOOL OFFICE CORKSCREW MIDDLE 2. FIRE PROTECTION IS PROVIDED BY C SCHOOL NORTH COLLIER FIRE RESCUE DISTRICT powalu F' Z:d O. 3. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS WITHIN ST/W 3 OF THE GOLDEN GATE ORANGE WELL FIELD BLOSSOM RANCW PALMETTO 4. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS NOT LOCATED WITHIN THE COUNTY'S HIGH SCHOOL COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA Oil we'1 i';a ; ;.„fli Rd__ 3 Orangetree . PUBLIC SERVICE FACILITIES LEGEND Immo�aice Rd \ • -SCHOOL Valencia Golf & Ccuntry Club NORTH COLLIER FIRE RESCUE DISTRICT STATI ON 10 • -HOSPITAL -SHERIFF /FIRE DEPARTMENT /EMS - LIMITS OF SUBJECT SITE 0 1500 3000 SCALE: 1" = 3000' LOCATED IN COLLIER COUNTY SUBJECT SITE IN FLOOD ZONE X & AE FIRM PANEL12021 CO240H NO BASE FLOOD ELEVATION LISTED EFF DATE: 5/16/2012 ZONE X: AREAS OF 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD; AREAS OF 1 % ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD WITH AVERAGE DEPTHS OF LESS THAN 1 FOOT OR WITH DRAINAGE AREAS LESS THAN 1 SQUARE MILE; AND AREAS PROTECTED BY LEVEES FROM 1 % ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS {SFHAs) SUBJECT TO INUNDATION BY THE 1% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD The 1% annual chance flood (100-year flood), also known as the base flood, is the flood that has a 1% chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year. The Special Flood Hazard Area is the area subject to flooding by the 1% annual chance flood. Areas of Special Flood Hazard include Zones A, AE, AH, AO, AR, A99, V and VE. The Base Flood Elevation is the water -surface elevation of the 1% annual chance flood. ZONE A No Base Flood Elevations determined. ZONE AE, AE Base Flood Elevations determined. o i5o 3eo SCALE IN FEET - LIMITS OF SUBJECT SITE i • i • i i • i � 3 _ . add IL Jr • ! i N N O CT W 0 CD CD a Z7 D (N (n (D N N 3 CD 0 3 3 0 m m c� a n D m_ D N N O (Jt W Q1 N CD i N W m D r O C� D —I O Z D N O N O N W NAPLES PLO GULF OF MEXICO Email: tuna@thanaples.com EVERGLADES CITY KEY WEST �'° SITE ADDRESS: <> FOLIOS: 37743960001, 37744000009, 37742840009 NAPLES, FL 34120 <> LATITUDE: <> LONGITUDE N 26.274522 W-81.601645 M I� NOTES: <> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES C AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. Marine &Environmental Consulting Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732 Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643111116632 LOCATION MAP RY NO. 5875 THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERlA ITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE, DESIGNED: CDREATEDY JOB NO.: SHEET NO, REV# REV BY. DA1 E CHK CV. Gr 22053.00 4" - - - - 01 OF 02 5" - - - - SECTION-27 TOWNSHIP- 48 S RANGE- 27 E ,.add. rod lad ' wood . to all 1 s�. didP4 do rad ad d at Ida Ilk p a do do onto ad Id fir; r IL qrdo 2 a �- old°�►sti w- e did IL ad 1 6 add do do0at Ado. 5M ad ` t ' y_r•� _ 7 r low sa ,, — toI„' :� . `.� ' In od ad w do ad do t IP i' ' "^� • 'took _r• •` / =his-r=� +► _ - — . s "Jr Y�M,i:.. WIT 1I irg .i IIIdd 10^ � kl it ad ad •t *'' WOODad did Ak do 4too eY :; - - 'fit. IdaA I- old vot ad tool P. go I do add road ,.t • v -r. �4 N� /,.. •M _ � ..: •,� � } `may,. — a. . t law LL AM ` _ do .. f ,�-a —•--r' 0%, -,o!��• _ J to f- ,r do *.f ra-a do IIIat I rat ado ' ` r. AIIIIIId • 3,. r rIII OIL r M\l9j jAd 1I R 4 .. a and �.. P, 624 ._ _ ill ad r k too I ..Ar d' at It 740 ,! aft go Add of do as old al y . Ati 40 , ' t: fad o NP R LIda r�i R : • J do�� i f; lip411IUD a _ a ad 'r ad rdid ii .�•�, do ILit two ob 4 44 as a hot AL 91 ad I do a *,'v I old nrN P, f # Mp .: pp ww do 00 A M ,a fold of 01 _ to ` .r .Y2� .ram w ! C t ti� .!• of AWN dottal-dad ad • • • • • • R• :: 4 • • • @ r , , . AM ., �� • •� 4 IF All, a t J wood y, • do•:. .y EXHIBIT V.C.l IMMOKALEE RD. PARCELS FOLIO #37742840009, 37744000009, AND 3774396001 NAPLES, FL 34120 PREPARED BY: ASSOCIATES, INC. Marine &Environmental Consulting PHo[NE:239-643-0166 VVWW.THAlNAPLES.COM Table of Contents 1 Introduction.......................................................................................................................................1 2 Site Description.................................................................................................................................2 2.1 Vegetation Associations...........................................................................................................2 2.2 Soils.............................................................................................................................................3 2.3 Hydrologic Indicators...............................................................................................................4 3 Photos..................................................................................................................................................5 4 Wildlife............................................................................................................................................... 9 5 Jurisdictional Wetlands.................................................................................................................10 6 Permitting.........................................................................................................................................11 7 Conclusion........................................................................................................................................12 Immokalee Rd. Parcels (Folio #3774284 1 Introduction Wetland Site Assessment Report 0009, 37744000009, and 3774396001) March 2022 Turrell, I�a118� associates, Inc. (THA) has conducted a preliminary wetland assessment at 3 non - addressed parcels off Immokalee Rd. in Naples, FL 34120 within Section 27, Township 48 S, and Range 27 E in Collier County. The parcels can be identified by folio #37742840009, 37744000009, and 3774396001 and are collectively approximately 11.68 acres in size. The goals of the assessment were: • To map and identify existing vegetative communities on the property • To estimate the extent of state and federal jurisdictional wetlands • To research the presence or absence of state and federal listed species • To assess the environmental permitting requirements for construction of residential development This report documents the findings of the assessment in order to establish a wetland boundary (if present) based on criteria used by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) in Chapter 62-340, F.A.C. This evaluation did not include a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment that may be necessary for the reduction of liability for hazardous materials under the provisions of Federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act. This assessment did not research or consider zoning, deed restrictions, easements, or other encumbrances that might be present and could affect the development of the property. This assessment was limited to the environmental factors only and is presented solely to assist with the planning process. 1 Immokalee Rd. Parcels (Folio #3774284 2 Site Description wetland Site Assessment Report 0009, 37744000009, and 3774396001) March 2022 This project site is composed of 2 distinct vegetative communities: a "Pine Flatwoods" habitat, which is an upland community, and a non-hydric Cypress -Pine -Cabbage Palm community, which is also an upland community. Soils within the site are mapped by the USDA as being comprised of 2 types of soil: "Immokalee fine sand", which is not a hydric soil, and "Holopaw fine sand" which is a hydric soil. Soil plugs taken on -site did not appear hydric. Hydrologic indicators were not observed anywhere on site. 2.1 Vegetation Associations The Florida Land Use, Cover, and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS) manual was used to classify all of the vegetative communities occurring within the site boundaries. The attached FLUCFCS exhibit shows the subject property, its vegetative cover, and depicts the approximate limits of the wetland and upland areas. A general description is provided below in Table 1 along with any site -specific nuances that may be relevant to the assessment. Table 1: FLUCFCS codes and description of community types found within the project site FLUCFCS Code Description Acres Jurisdictional wetlands 411 Pine Flatwood 9.79 No 530 Reservoirs 1.32 Yes 624 Cypress - Pine - Cabbage Palm (Non~Hydric) 0.22 No 740 Disturbed Land 0.16 No 814 Roads and Highways 0.19 No Total: 11.68 Pine Flatwood Vegetative communities in Florida designated as Pine Flatwoods typically occur in such a way that the canopy is dominated by longleaf or slash pine while the substrata is composed of a variety of upland species such as saw palmetto or American beautyberry. Within the Pine flatwoods community on this site, the canopy is composed primarily of slash pine while cabbage palms are common associates. The substrata of the Pine Flatwood community on this site are composed mainly of additional cabbage palms, saw palmetto, and muscadine grape vines. A list of observed species within the Pine Flatwoods community on the site can be seen below in Table 2. Table 2: Observed vegetation within the Pine Flatwood habitat on site. Common Name Scientific Name Strata,/ Substrata Wetland Designation Est. Coverage Slash p1l LIC; Pinus elliottii C, M, G UPL 70 Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto C, G FAC 40 Cypress Taxodium distichum C OBL 1 Wetland Site Assessment Report Immokalee Rd. Parcels (Folio #37742840009, 37744000009, and 3774396001) March 2022 Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolia C, M, G FAC 3 Saw palmetto Serrenoa repens G UPL 30 American beautyberry Callicarpa americana G UPI, 3 Earleaf acacia Acacia aunculiformis C, M, G FAC 1 Muscadine grape Vitis rotund ifoIia G, V FAC 20 Rusty Staggerbush Lyonia ferruginea G UPI, 5 Swamp fern Telmatoblechnum serrulatum G FACW 1 Cocoplum Chrysobalanus icaco G FACW 1 C =Canopy M =Mid -story G =Groundcover V =Vine OBL - Obligate Wetland FACW = Facultative Wetland FAC = Facultative FACU = Facultative Upland UPL = Upland Cypress -Pine -Cabbage Palm Vegetative communities in Florida designated as Cypress - Pine - Cabbage Palm are typically defined by a mixture of the three namesake species where no single species has attained complete dominance. The canopy of the Cypress - Pine - Cabbage Palm community on this site is characteristically comprised of slash pine, cypress, and cabbage palm, while the groundcover consists of saw palmetto, Brazilian pepper, muscadine grape vines, and minorly of swamp fern. A list of observed species of vegetation within the Cypress - Pine - Cabbage Palm community on this site can be seen below in Table 3. Table 3: Observed vegetation within the Cypress -Pine -Cabbage Palm community on site. Common Name Scientific Name Strata/ Substrata Wetland Designation Est. Coverage C y p ress Taxodium distichum C OBL 25 Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto C, G FAC 25 Slash pil LK,- Pinus elliottii C, M, G UPI, 15 Laurel oak Quercus laurifolia 5 Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolia C, M, G FAC 20 Saw palmetto Serrenoa repens 10 Muscadine grape Vitis rotundifolia G, V FAC 5 Swamp fern Telmatoblechnum serrulatum G FACW 3 C =Canopy M =Mid -story G =Groundcover V =Vine OBL -Obligate Wetland FACW =Facultative Wetland FAC =Facultative FACU = Facultative Upland UPI, = Upland 2.2 Soils According to the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), there are 2 types of soil mapped as comprising the entirety of the subject property: "Immokalee fine sand", which is not a hydric soil, and "Holopaw fine sand" which is a hydric soil. Soil plugs taken on -site did not appear hydric anywhere within the three parcels surveyed. It is likely that the canal to the east of 3 Wetland Site Assessment Report Immokalee Rd. Parcels (Folio #37742840009, 37744000009, and 3774396001) March 2022 the subject properties has drained the sites to a point where the soils are no longer hydric (if they ever were). 2.3 Hydrologic Indicators Hydrologic indicators were not observed anywhere on the subject properties. Additionally, the site also exhibited several indicators of a lack of hydrology —most notably the over -growth of vines growing along the ground. In some locations, the vines have "buried" all underlying vegetation. Also notable on the site were 2 apparent gopher tortoise burrows. Though burrows can occasionally be found in more wet areas, they are most often found in dry upland areas. The volume of leaf litter on the ground is also not consistent with wetland habitat. These factors, in addition to the canal to the east, and the almost entirely upland vegetation found throughout the 3 parcels indicates that none of the three sites contain functioning wetlands. 0 NIX far toll Valiant a two IN 3 may^ •, r . -- s.' \f !. �t' 1 rf - p, c i, r• ma 4 at 44 1.0 a IN 4 now goo or I I A Iv it 4 i?"Ingait No an bi S 1 E TV 1 A one la 0 _ tJj R , _ M IPA +e �,, 1 j IF I♦. `.`. look ow 1 on No No I air "PA 0 •a .•.i { or 4011 ♦.{ .gg�' e. `al•• -�'- , . a ti • ".:ter-.'Y good? a - ,'hl '% �, ir+yll' R !���T i , % IV wo Via I &I Van, I gI I al 1 00 0 Ion IF A go I A ma to Van WI III tip Affi, I no 0 owe .r g _ ter- -�• - f '" i, so Von ,No Ids - 1 }�r , 1 got, Not mignIgoo aw, zw 01 or go ►� J. S . Y•, ' �r�ry�,� �li!4' ►!10 il�r F 1 III a It 61 - -"1 (go; wwo A _ -'Al� Y jiy a.a7 ram: - ._ e'd•P :.: �A 'All j 1"VI • �t--tom'}``go 1 r Nato ,� `1 • .� :� . 1. _ _� .. IV to no +ems :f _ .. to r r. r t^ .� : of .• �•. •e ,.a.r IL I NEW I alp Wrong Von on IF 440 go No ago for I Alto No�,. - / yy -age to E Y ( rL- y ,[ i > . ♦ e +• R r f yyGglop yVon _. _ WN t L r.•�. 00 I IMF I t p 4' e• IF no VIVO to a . 1. al i•, 1 , {oppopas 06 r. jay y for Ir y 1 MI do I go %o ... � = 'A goo C•'Voll, Iowa, I long .��_ J, •;`` , . - ram` -. Wetland Site Assessment Report Immokalee Rd. Parcels (Folio #37742840009, 37744000009, and 3774396001) March 2022 Photo 3: View of Pine Flatwood habitat on northwest site. Photo 4: Cypress -Pine -Cabbage Palm community on site. Weiland Site Assessment Report Immokalee Rd. Parcels (Folio #37742840009, 37744000009, and 3774396001) March 2022 Photo 5: Gopher tortoise burrow found just off of the property, likely indicative of dry conditions. Photo 6: Vines seen covering the ground, indicative of a lack of hydrology 7 Immokalee F.A. P Par Wetland Site Assessment Report (Folio #37742840009, 37744000009, and 3774396001) March 2022 1 404..\'I Jr, oreere or b A 4 Ago gIV ' :A , *r:: { rr ` Y v r Y �t� `oft 41 0441 or i'= 1 + • :� . 1 1. f Sh: +—• k ter. Ago o's VARNA of AW to t Ago Age + _. rot 0Amto ?�'' .t.. a '.` `_ , r or. grow of to ogge* op I, Pro r to, - t +': i 0 or gig. offir r of I for Iry It ff got ''� s ."' .•ate - of A �•_Ir or Y sa. LL r At .� . — — �.. rAt Photo 7: Soil p lug taken on site. go F r ore Age � AW go ego 7it.titijt ' To I or I _:.• .;p . tiIgo L 'A For Or p . ; geor i— r, kkk or T •�.� • Af ,iz on, 4 {• ry� -f uric, go" Al .!p too g v 4 ,1••mr _r c>h b� ry IS if - f "F got L -of or tort ry w Vo Wooer top go 1 r ot It 1, 4{ r w� S ? �` - ds to ro or,� ,�- •"aAt AL �• '. go jf'ov. Art go �, -'1� —^ ter• - T or Ago At ►.¢ ,L 40 pit —A Photo 8: Cross section of plug seen in Photo 7, taken at 6" depth. Note the lack in contrast of color, characteristic of a lack of stripping within the soil's matrix. Wetland Site Assessment Report Immokalee Rd. Parcels (Folio #37742840009, 37744000009, and 3774396001) March 2022 4 Wildlife Endangered Wildlife Species is defined as any species of fish or wildlife naturally occurring in Florida, whose prospects of survival are in jeopardy due to modification or loss of habitat, over - utilization for commercial, sporting, scientific or educational purposes; disease; predation; inadequacy of regulatory mechanisms; or other natl or manmade factors affecting its ura continued existence (FS 372.072). Threatened species include any species of fish or wildlife naturally occurring in Florida which may not be in immediate danger of extinction, but which exists in such small populations as to become endangered if it is subjected to increased stress as a result of further modification of its environment. Species of Special Concern are animals that: 1) Have a significant vulnerability to habitat modification, environmental alteration, human disturbance, or human exploitation which, in the foreseeable future, may result in its becoming a threatened species unless appropriate protective or management techniques are initiated or maintained, 2) Data are limited or lacking, 3) May occupy such an unusually vital or essential ecological niche that should it decline significantly in numbers or distribution other species would be adversely affected to a significant degree, 4) Has not sufficiently recovered from a past population depletion. Taking into account the location and condition of the property, and conversations with state aI d federal agency personnel, listed wildlife species that could potentially be found on or around the site include: Common Name Florida -aanther Florida bonneted bat Eastern indi o snake Red cockaded woodpecker Gopher tortoise Scientific Name Status Puma concolor corUi f E Eumops floridanus Drymarchon couperi Leuconotobicus borealis herus pol�uphemus E E T During the course of the wetland assessment on site, no listed species nor signs thereof were observed with the exception of a single apparently abandoned gopher tortoise burrow on the northeastern parcel, and a second potentially occupied burrow on an adjacent parcel, near the property boundary. It is important to note that although 2 burrows were observed, a tortoise burrow survey was not specifically completed. These burrows were simply noted during the wetland assessment field work and the count provided is not representative of the total burrow count on site. Furthermore, a full blown Threatened and Endangered Species survey was also not done (and may not be required). Wetland Site Assessment Report Immokalee Rd. Parcels (Folio #37742840009, 37744000009, and 3774396001) March 2022 5 Jurisdictional Wetlands The wetlands definition in Chapter 62-340(19), F.A.C. states that wetlands are those areas "inundated or saturated by surface water or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soils." The methodology used to delineate a wetland boundary as described in Chapter 62-340, F.A.C. uses a series of tests in order to determine the presence of a wetland. On a significant portion of this site, this definition was met. In order to be considered a wetland per the definition referenced above, a property must have two of three of the following characteristics: hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and hydrologic indicators. Within the Pine Flatwoods community on -site, vegetation is hydrologic indicators were observed, and soils did not appear not meet the definition of a jurisdictional wetland, primarily upland in nature, no hydric. This area therefore does Within the Cypress -Pine -Cabbage Palm community on -site, vegetation may be considered hydrophytic. Though soils did not appear hydric and no hydrologic indicators were observed either. This area therefore also does not meet the definition of a jurisdictional wetland. During the scope of this report, the "Disturbed", "Roads and Highways", and the "Reservoirs" areas were not analyzed. The "Disturbed" and "Roads and Highways" are assumed to be uplands. And the "reservoirs" area is assumed to be a wetland. 10 Immokalee Rd. Parcels (Folio #37742840 6 Permitting Wetland Site Assessment Report 009, 37744000009, and 3774396001) March 2022 It is the opinion of TI-IA that n0 portion of the subject properties (barring the "Reservoirs" area) appears to meet the definition of a jurisdictional wetland per Chapter 62-340 F.A.C. Accordingly, it is not expected that any kind of Environmental Resource Permit or 404 permit for wetland impacts will be required to move forward with development of these properties. If the local building department requires proof that the project sites do not consist of wetlands, then this proof can be obtained from the FDEP or South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) by requesting a verification of exemption from needing permits. This process typically takes around 30 days to obtain and involves a site visit by a representative of either the FDEP or SFWMD. If the area is confirmed as not consisting of wetlands, then no further wetland permitting will be required at the state or federal levels, and mitigation will not needed. If the representative disagrees with this assessment, and permitting for wetland impacts is required, this process can take up to 9 to 12 months to complete and will require mitigation to offset impacts to jurisdictional wetlands. The regulating agencies will also coordinate with wildlife agencies such as the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) regarding listed species which can include but are not limited to the red cockaded woodpecker, Florida panther, the Florida bonneted bat, various wading birds and other species. There is a public notice associated with this permit process which allows the public, adjacent owners, and other government agencies an opportunity to review the project and provide comments. Once any comments have been addressed and the mitigation paid, a permit can be issued. 11 Wetland Site Assessment Report Immokalee Rd. Parcels (Folio 7T37742840009, 37744 7 Conclusion 000009, and 3774396001) March 2022 Based on the wetlands definon in Chapter 62-340(19), F.A.C., it is the opinion of THA that no portion of this site meets the definition of a jurisdictional wetland (with the exception of the canal to the east) and permits from the FDEP or SFWMD should not be required to move forward with development. If verification of exemption from needing a state permit is required in order to obtain a local building permit, this can typically be obtained in approximately 30 days. 12 EVERGLADES KEY WEST iOr CITY SITE ADDRESS: <> FOLIOS: 37743960001, 37744000009, 37742840009 NAPLES, FL 34120 <> LATITUDE: <> LONGITUDE N 26.274522 W-81.601645 M I, NOTES: <> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES C AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. - Turrell, Hall &Associates, Inc, Marine &Environmental Consulting 3584 Exchange Ave. Naplcs, FL 34104-3732 Email: tuna@thanaples.com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Far: (239) 643-6632 DESIGNED. NP 1, _ _ _ S AA � E H ASSESSMENT CREATEDY 03-23-22 3. _ _ _ _ JOB IVO. 22053.00 4. - - - - LOCATION MAP SHEET NO. 010F03 5. _ _ _ _ RY N0, 5875 THE E DRAVANOS ARE FOR PERNITT INC PURP09E3 ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUOTION USE. SECTION - 27 TOWNSHIP- 4 8 S RAN tit W4. if 411 A.. � y It V w, k A � ---. _ _ ,----------.---- . ___ "KALE AIP LID SUBJECT s WAL Air V t` ti "- 44pv oil, Ilk .Y:. - �'�✓. f y ? i.,�,s .; V. IV ` .r.��� e 'Fir .-+9"elf . oIW 27 leot -�Ml� ryr .i 'r,•,{+ M 7!iu °�r {i � '.7' ".•��'+F � C or IV .�T- - t,�. ...,r r --. _ WL rw. �.. I -�. t► ,� ``T Ij .j}�r + w -irr ce •�► � � ,T. s, .._ WIN W 000 Ilk It IILV lyp VIEW > Aey k �rIt y� r it AIN AltEt •fir . 1 "+�+VV (r yyM ,�. - r• ,nvi ji - 1�f N t yam; A wow ilk �� .'N �-/Y •x � +fI ` r [ Y �•y..Y�a 4 T.•r .- +ti a .w ,, r _xNOTES.,. SURVEY • . SURVEY • , _!F � �f •o tii t � c• tt. R , . JI it, 11 lililill III,, EXHIBIT V.C.2 GM ADVISORS LLC IMMOI<Air EE RD. PARCELS NAPLES, FL 34120 FOLIO #37743960001, 377440000091 AND 37742840009 PREPARED BY: ASSOCIATES, INC. Marine &Environmental Consulting PHc�INTE:239-643--0166 VVWW.THAIN1A1'LES.CQM 1 Introduction....................................................................................................................0.. 0...............1 2 Existing Conditions and Project Description..............................................................................2 3 Methodology......................................................................................................................................3 4 Data &Results................................................................................................................................... 4 5 Discussion.......................................................................................................................................... 6 6 Conclusion........................................................................................................................................10 7 Photos................................................................................................................................................11 Immokalee Rd. Parcels Listed Species Assessment August 2022 1 Introduction Terrell, I Ia118� Associates, Inc. (TI-3A) has performed a listed species assessment On 4 vacant lots located just off of Immokalee Rd. in Naples, Florida. The properties are bordered to the south by single-family residences, to the north and west by vacant residential lots, and to the east by a man-made canal, across which is a Fire Department station and an additional vacant lot. The sites are located within Section 27, Township 48 S, and Range 27 E in Collier County. The parcels can be identified by folio #37743960001, 37744000009, and 37742840009 and are collectively 15.46 acres in size. The sites can be found at coordinates N 26°16'32.56", W-81°367.31" or N 26.275712, W-81.602031. This listed species assessment was conducted at the request of the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), but is intended for use by any regulating agencies, such as The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE), the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC)., the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), or the Collier County building department. This document addresses state and federally listed species that may be associated with the proposed project lands and the effect, or lack thereof, of this project on these species. The species at issue include: • Florida bonneted bat (FBB) (Eumops glaucinus floridanus) • Red -cockaded woodpecker (R(.W) (Picoides borealis) • Big Cypress fox squirrel (Sciurus niger avicennia) • Eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon couperi) • Gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) • Florida panther (Puma concolor corgi) The result of the analysis in this document is a determination that the development activities proposed are not likely to adversely affect any of the above listed species. The reasoning behind this conclusion is further discussed in the Discussion below (Section 5). This document is based on information compiled from the South Florida Multi -Species Recovery Plan ("SFMSRP"), Statewide Programmatic Biological Opinions, wildlife surveys, field inspections, and other sources of information. 1 Immokalee Rd. Parcels Listed Species Assessment August 2022 At present, the subject properties consist predominantly of approximately 9.79 acres of Pine Flatwood habitat and 3.23 acres of a man-made stormwater retention area. The remainder of space consists of 0.74 acres of roads and highways, 0.17 acres of disturbed Land, 1.32 acres of canals or "reservoirs", and 0.22 acres of Cypress -Pine -Cabbage Palm habitat. Undisturbed areas within the subject properties can be categorized by just 2 habitat types: Pine Flatwoods, and Cypress -Pine -Cabbage Palm. Within the Pine Flatwood on this site, canopy coverage consists predominantly of slash pine while occasional cypress and cabbage palms are also present, but in notably lesser abundance. Midstory and groundcover are sparse and comprised predominantly of cabbage palm, saw palmetto, American beautyberry, and muscadine grape vines. Within the Cypress -Pine -Cabbage Palm, canopy coverage is predominantly of cypress trees, while slash pine, cabbage palm, Brazilian pepper, and laurel oaks are common associates. Mid story and groundcover are largely comprised of Brazilian pepper, swamp fern, and saw palmetto. The proposed project entails clearing of the remaining wooded lots (approximately 10.17 acres), creating a new stormwater retention area on the southern parcel, and relocating the outfall structures from the existing to the new stormwater retention area. The parcel containing the new stormwater retention area would be deeded to Collier County, while the remaining parcels would be developed in some fashion. For the sake of this report, the determined future use is unknown at this time. While the vegetative communities on site are not suitable for many listed species, they can potentially serve as habitat for the Florida bonneted bat (FBB, Eumops floridanus), Red cockaded woodpecker (RCW, Leuconotopicus borealis), Big Cypress fox squirrel (Sciurus niger avicennia), Eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon couperi), Gopher tortoise (Gopherus Polyphemus), and Florida panther (Puma concolor coryi). Existing conditions at the sites and other material facts such as overall hydrology or development within the vicinity may still preclude the site as potential habitat. Analyses of the likelihood or potential of encountering each species listed above is further discussed in the Discussion section below (Section 5). Immokalee Rd. Parcels Listed Species Assessment August 2022 Prior to conducting any wildlife survey or assessment, careful consideration is given to the habitat types) in question and species which are known to utilize such areas. Thus, before any survey is carried out, a number of publications and references are consulted. These include but are not limited to: The Official Lists of Florida's Endangered Species, Threatened Species and Species of Special Concern, dated December 2018, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) Wildlife Methodology Guidelines, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service South Florida Listed Species Profiles and Conservation Areas, and the Florida Natural Areas Inventory (FNAI) for Collier County. The basic objective of any preliminary wildlife assessment is to obtain evidence that a listed species is utilizing the subject site. However, due to the elusive nature of many listed species, direct observation or locating evidence can often be difficult or not possible. Therefore, if no listed species or evidence is observed, the objective is to determine the likelihood that a listed species may be utilizing the site, and whether the proposed activity is likely to impact that species. The site may be comprised of primary or secondary feeding, foraging, or nesting zones or merely be adjacent to those sites for a particular listed species. As many species of concern in Florida are cryptic or camouflaged and nocturnal or crepuscular, patience and sufficient time must be devoted to the survey. Prior to arriving on -site, aerial and FLUCCS mapping are consulted and a system of meandering transects are then followed throughout the site. A slow pace along the transects is maintained, stopping every few minutes to look and listen for movement, calls of any animals, burrows in the ground, tree cavities, and other direct or indirect evidence of utilization. A visual inspection of trees was conducted to search specifically for squirrel day beds, potential RCW cavities, and FBB roosts. Indirect evidence such as rooting, scrape marks, nests, cavities, burrows, tracks, and scat are searched for, duly noted, and located with a GPS in case of the need for further investigation prior to clearing. If direct observation of listed species approximate sighting locations of any listed species are also noted on a survey aerial. 3 occurs, Immokalee Rd. Parcels Listed Species Assessment August 2022 To date, the subject properties have been visited a number of times. A short description of each visit has been provided below in Table 1: Table 1: Timing and conditions during each visit to the subject properties: Date Time Ambient Conditions Tem erature (F) 3/24/2022 12:00 pin - 4:00 pm Scattered clouds, 0 - 5 mph winds 850 7/27/22 10:30 am -1:00 pm Clear skies, 5 -10 mph winds 870 8/16/22 8:30 am -12:00 pm Clear skies, 5 -10 mph winds 880 A list of all wildlife species directly observed on the site is provided below in Table 2. Designations are per the Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's South Florida Listed Species Lists. Table 2: Species of wildlife observed while on -site Common Name Scientific Name Status Black vulture Coragyps atratus NL Red bellied woodpecker Melanerpes carolinus NL Northern mockingbird Mimus polyglottos NL Eastern cottontail rabbit Sylvilagus floridanus NL *Observed flying overhead S = State T = Threatened 1d = FWS Species of Management Concern F =Federal E = Endangered NL = Not listed During the initial survey inspection, it was noted that 2 burrows were found within the boundaries of the subject properties. The first was in the berm of the stormwater retention area and appeared to be an active or potentially occupied gopher tortoise burrow. The second burrow was located nearby within the Pine Flatwood habitat and appeared to be an abandoned gopher tortoise burrow. Tortoises were not observed within the burrows or anywhere else on site. Also observed during this inspection were a number of dead slash pines containing cavity holes that could potentially be utilized by the Florida bonneted bat. During this initial inspection, no additional listed species or evidence of listed species was noted. The second site visit was completed in conjunction with a representative from the South Florida Water Management District. At this time a full-scale survey of the properties was not completed. Rather this site visit was conducted for the purposes of a wetland assessment. However, during the visit, no direct or indirect observation of listed species was noted. And it was found that both of the apparent gopher tortoise burrows seen in the initial site visit, were no longer present. Immokalee Rd. Parcels Listed Species Assessment August 2022 During the third site visit, the entirety of the subject properties were surveyed and assessed for listed species (as was done in the initial site visit). During this visit, again neither direct nor direct evidence of listed speci ines of wildlife was observed on any of the subject properties. Gopher tortoise burrows remained absent from the sites, and the snags observed in the initial inspection were gps located. These cavities are discussed in further detail below in Section 5. 5 Immokalee Rd. Parcels Listed Species Assessment August 2022 5 Discussion As stated above in the results section, no direct observations of listed species were made during any of the site visits. However, it is important to emphasize that the lack of direct observation of listed species on the site by -itself is not sufficient evidence for a conclusion that the site is void of listed species. This is particularly true considering the 2 burrows observed in the initial inspection anA the 4 cavity snags present on site. Sti11, considering the habitat present on the sites, surrounding developments, and the impacts proposed on the property, we can make inferences as to the likelihood of impacts to listed species occurring as a result of a proposed project. Before considering the scope of impacts proposed and the location and condition of the property, all listed species that could potentially be found on or around habitats which are present on -site must be considered. A list of protected species which may be found in habitats similar to that which is found on the subject properties can be seen below in Table 3. Table 3: Listed species of wildlife that occur in habitats similar to that of the subject property. Common Name Scientific Name Status Florida bonneted bat (FBB) Eumops floridanus FE, SE Red cockaded woodpecker RCW Leuconotopicus borealis FE, SE Big cypress fox squirrel Sciurus niger avicennia ST Eastern indigo snake Drymarchon couperi FT, ST Gopher tortoise Gopherus polyphemus ST Florida panther Puma concolor coryi FE, SE S =State T =Threatened F =Federal E = Endangered Florida Bonneted Bat (FBB The FBB is a black or gray -brown to cinnamon -brown colored bat with short glossy fur. Though small relative to other native Floridian mammals, it is the largest bat found in Florida. The FBBs' ears, after which it is named, are large and project forward approximately 19-31 mm. Due to the scarcity and logistics of studying the FBB, roosting, foraging and breeding characteristics for the FBB are not well understood. According to available but limited scientific data, they can be found roosting in old dead trees, in palm fronds, behind loose bark, in cracks, and in holes carved out by other birds or insects. To date, there have only been a handful of confirmed active roosts located in natural settings (i.e. trees, snags, etc.). FBBs are most often found using manmade structures such as bat houses, the underside of bridges and overpasses, roof tiles, and abandoned buildings. They are not migratory and feed on insects such as beetles, moths, and flies. To consider potential effects of residential construction on the FBB, potential roosting habitats were identified based on information from the 2013 Florida Fish 8� Wildlife Conservation Immokalee Rd. Parcels Listed Species Assessment August 2022 Commission Species Action Plan and then surveyed for evidence of bat utilization following survey guidance from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The habitat on this site consists almost entirely of Pine Flatwoods. In these types of habitats, primary roosting sites consist of cabbage palm frond husks, excavated cavities in dead or dying pine trees, or within cracks or under the bark of living trees. Numerous cabbage palms and several snags or dead trees are present on the subject property (see exhibit sheet 4 for snag and dead tree locations). Although each potential roosting site was inspected to the best of our ability, none could be confirmed as containing or not containing bats due to the height and inaccessibility of the cavities. However, audible noises, droppings, direct observations, etc. were not noted during the survey period. If required, each cavity will be inspected with a peep camera prior to clearing. Considering the remaining habitat on and off the site, relative scarcity of utilization of natural roosts, and the direct observation of red -bellied woodpeckers on the site which compete for space with bats, it is unlikely that the cavities are utilized by bonneted bats. Therefore, impacts to the Florida Bonneted Bat will likely not be incurred as the result of removal of the snags and construction of a project. Red Cockaded Woodpecker (R The RCW is anon -migratory, territorial bird typically reaching an overall length of approximately 8 to 9 inches. They live in cooperative social breeding groups and use mature pine trees (longleaf or slash pine) to develop nest cavities. The RCW is the only North American woodpecker that excavates its roost and nest cavities in living pine trees. In this area of south Florida, RCWs typically only use mature slash pine trees for cavity construction. To consider potential effects of the proposed project on the RCW, potential nesting trees are identified based on information from the 2004 FWS Species Conservation Guidelines and then surveyed for evidence of cavity construction following survey guidance from the FWS. While surveying transects across the property, all slash pine trees greater than 5 inches dbh are noted and inspected for signs of cavities or cavity excavation. On this site, the Pine Flatwood habitat that covers the majority of the project site and could be considered a suitable habitat for the RCW. However, the vast majority of pine trees present on this site are not mature and so as a result, likely cannot support cavity excavation by RCWs. Furthermore, there were no cavities observable within living slash pine trees anywhere on the site. Considering that no cavities were observed within living pine trees on site and that other non -listed species of woodpeckers were observed during the site visit, the likelihood that RCWs will be affected by the proposed activities is most likely minimal to non-existent. Bid Cypress Fox Squirrel The Big Cypress fox squirrel is a large tree squirrel that typically reaches lengths of approximately 22 to 26 inches and which often occurs in a combination of colors including black, orange, white and silver. 7 Immokalee Rd, Parcels Listed Species Assessment August 2022 In general, the big cypress fox squirrel prefers areas comprised of a mosaic of pine forests, cypress swamps, and hardwood hammocks where the groundcover is relatively open. This allows for foraging along the ground and direct line of sight on potential predators. The habitat on this site could be considered consistent with the needs of the fox squirrel as it ists Pine d CCbbPlhbitat consof mostly Flatwoods anminorly of ypress -Pine -aage am a. Additionally, much of the sites contain a sparse midstory and groundcover. However, lack of utilization evidence such as direct observation, visible day beds, chewed pinecones, etc, indicates that the site is likely not currently being utilized. The adjacent road and canal system have likely g . aided in isolatinthis location from utilization Eastern Indio Snake The eastern Indigo snake is a large, stout bodied snake that can reach lengths of up to 8 feet and which is almost entirely black in color with the exception of the chin and throat regions, which can range in color from reddish brown to white. The eastern indigo snake utilizes a wide range of habitats from upland scrubs and sandhills to wet prairies and mangrove swamps. They can often be found residing in gopher tortoise or armadillo burrows, Considering their elusive nature, their large home range, and the wide array of habitats they may utilize, there is potential that eastern indigo snakes could be found within the project area. However, no eastern indigo snakes were directly observed on the project site. Nor were there any burrows observed in the latest survey which could be utilized, or other indication of potential utilization. Therefore, although the entirety of the property technically consists of land that may provide suitable habitat, it is unlikely that that the proposed project will by itself have a measurable impact on the eastern indigo snake. Should an eastern indigo snake be found on the site at any time, the appropriate authorities will be notified accordingly. Gopher Tortoise The gopher tortoise is a medium sized tortoise that generally reaches a total length of 10 to 12 inches and which is fully adapted for life in upland habitats. They commonly utilize habitats such as sandhills, upland scrub, xeric oak hammocks, or disturbed sites such as pastures or developed building sites to dig burrows. Gopher tortoises tend to gravitate towards habitats containing a sparse canopy with an open understory as this allows for easy navigation of habitat and burrows can often be structurally supported by roots. However, gopher tortoises typically avoid dense forests as abundant roots can act as insurmountable obstacles for burrow excavation. Gopher tortoises construct burrows of usually 5 to 15 feet in length (though they can sometimes be much longer) to avoid predation and for shelter from inclement weather such as cold temperatures or forest fires. Habitats containing or being actively utilized by gopher tortoises are easily identified by the burrow apron of fresh (often white) sand that is excavated from the burrow which is often "decorated" with droppings in and around the burrow entrance. Immokalee Rd. Parcels Listed Species Assessment August 2022 On this site, a significant portion of habitat is a Pine Flatwood community, which is suitable for habitation by the gopher tortoise. However, as of the last 2 site visits, there were no observable burrows found on the site. Therefore, the proposed project will most likely have no effect on the gopher tortoise. Because of the 2 burrows observed during the initial survey, however, any construction crews will be advised of the potential for tortoise encounters so as to take care avoiding adverse interactions. Should additional tortoise burrows become established within 25 feet of the footprint of a project on site, the appropriate removal permits will be obtained, and the inhabiting tortoise(s) will be relocated to a permitted off -site location. Florida Panther The Florida Panther is a large reddish -brown and white cat, endemic to the Floridian peninsula that is typically observed between 70 and 150 lbs. The Florida panther is typically found within a range of mostly forested upland and wetland habitats. Large wetland tracts of habitat have been proven to be of particular importance as these areas are mostly inaccessible to humans and as a result, provide diurnal refuge. The subject properties are located in an area designated by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service as a secondary zone of the South Florida Panther focus area. Therefore, this location could potentially be utilized by the Florida Panther. However, considering its near entirely upland status, largely open understory, proximity to Immokalee Road (which is a major roadway), and other adjacent man-made developments, this location is likely less attractive for use by panthers than many other locations. Immokalee Rd. Parcels Listed Species Assessment August 2022 6 Conclusion Although the location of the subject properties is within the consultation areas of several listed species and suitable habitat is present for certain species as well, there is no evidence or indication that the site is actually currently being utilized by any of these species. Therefore, it is the opinion of T�IA that the development of the subject properties should not adversely impact any listed or protected species. 10 ONE Is olls- 0 or L .i LL to oft IOWA 100 NO - op (( •i.. •y y No r IF {,�� 4IF IF I ON VON t _ IF IF III . a IF In 1 (AV dl If . IN IF A NO CI _ .f .� � _ r �. -, 77 Off A t /rt7•, IL 4 i. 4- Y. .� ' ti�•ylp�rl f, ( t, •+ 1 FF . �f � 1 No IF AV, Iry F low L Near t I ; a 0 j. — ,. � , ''3,SAN ' wool AN I VIA 04 ANN VAN a AV Ilk -A; OWN As FlboN 0 NFL For A ot , 4L 4 AN AF or of. ask Fri Vol I AV IN a AV Map ;, a t IV 64 AV o� Alp of w so AN F or M. stArissam; F 6 Vol also k iyvr ,VA ' s ' - t _ r ly�f ,r ._--- -- .._.._ _ _. _ .�.'_ _ Z I' _"_ to S.J. r r. . -+....-,ter---- - _ . r- A. ' �Ammmmmm- -A- VAN L tea--• f. ,ifa A.VAN_ - .. - ate. - �.'2•r Si _ •- I\ I �i ��M! �- _ ter. �cw No N r •F Fs of `� - . `} , Now . %f f• - 11 ly , t fA'r . aNfoo SESS .y �► ' r r ems. r al �! R ► r 1 r �^ .G .. ..alAjIaNlR,o i IoOSw1k B4.T"1IN%9fOII4,a rS VAa :awN jIe vow r do l aA lVr ♦yy7 , 4 _ , �; l s ,-' .' : ; _ 1; �. q __ �. sp \-- ikk IN Saww ti' y r _., ol t 1' iNo , i�� �� T" r�' -s • • • -.X a ems►;, .-1• � _ 1Eve VON Vol VTWF i� Email: tuna@thanaples.com EVERGLADES KEY WEST iOrvV CITY COLLIER COUNTY SITE ADDRESS: <> FOLIOS: 37743960001, 37744000009, 37742840009 NAPLES, FL 34120 <> LATITUDE: <> LONGITUDE N 26.274522 W-81.601645 PJI, NOTES: <> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES C AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. �ur�ell, Hall & Associates, Inc, Marine &Environmental Consulting Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732 Phone: (239)643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 �M ,�.ovisoR.s, LOCATION MAP RY NO. 5875 THESE DRAWIJ NGS ARE FOR PEP ITTING PURPOSES ONLY VJD ARE NOT INTETIDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE, DESIGNED: L � � DP,A1M1 BY CREATED: JOB NO. SHEET NO.: SECTION-27 TOWNSHIP- 48 S RANGE- 27 E per EPA t --, _AI ME 1 ' Also C-1, . , 0. ' Ilk_.a te iAM -- r to It �- -GAIL 0_ _ we —`AA `A 534 ilt.o r A AM 1 to: .4'go E A ALL k 411 T 41 'L. ��7 'Y k - Me A � ' r w 4 Afff .fir r I - Alp. M .� it ;�AM I ' r ".• Me At Apeopeol A, �.. It 1 �k `ilk . .� . Met ME AP IRA teo vie IS *1 k 41� V A ix 0:0 4A tp Met 0 Me AL AM AM AM PINE FLATWOODS 1 .0 ME little AM MEW AM ME em"o el ALE A At pt CYPRESS PINE CABBAGE PALM ,i,•.i'.� �as It . r MA M I'M11 A Ad A. r At F III I ;vtm & o� . I A oft •. �. ME 4lMe v A f�Aa, �.t,'M � . M m*• , -ice JAMMEMEAME Its INEZ 't' • i •t .��{„ • �.I w,, MI.. .'yam eep- UPLAND , . / I ife, '�C,+ 1A, 140out r A- It Me mommmo -P All A MAP -e I EPA AMAAAAt le AM .. r •. f A. MIA�--�NOTES: THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ■ MI Me ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. Uri Awl 7 MiI SURVEY COURTESY OF: "NO SURVEY DATA AVAILABLE" A EPA �F SURVEY DATED: MMmDDmYYYY j � i L Alp .�y • 1 \ t 1 \ L Turrell, Halt & Associates, ffic. ■ ��aaa Al ar" I OF ear "WOO 1 ads I IV Y�offg' } . ,. 60 it r i *ice_, h j c s f aim � l n iIF elln, to '< It ff VV IV I IV bw 010, + VVIV r yy' +�P • ,IF J i c:� ► JOINIf of ) + ' wir IV r�� 4, ; 7 t k` 1$ i s , lo n I� 1JNo A ►Go ' V.i F� : t:Af I * ` ` i■ lo 4 NOMy "1 •�. ! i ' : use " r f►. 1lf+t MsX 1 I { 1 t i I t }i a leek l .•y, .+qor 10 ■ • • / _UI. 111114! lltM Il,_ 1111 lax liillli - fl,llilll,rllill - ! - IIIIIIII'I1111111111I`�,I s I;II{III - jj j llllllllfll11111111111111 -•. � �...�-T•:' ;,;,-- I11III1III11(111� 11111111111111t{i ,►IIII ,.t � �. �`° IIIII1111{11111111111111{ (111111111111111 Jill III11111�' »,�>`a:' 1111,1,1-I1111111111111111 1111I{IIIIIIIIIIIII1111�. 11111,1�i 4�_�: IIfIIIIII�I� _ ;+1-t� IIIIIIIIIIIIII{fl 1 - .,' R,•. ,��,,- I I I I I I I I .r"I l l l l l t l l l l l l l l {III I I I I .� �' � -� IIII1111,11{1111 {f1111{IIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIII t 1111111111111111111111,11 1111111111111111j1 Illlllltll�.if II;IIIIIii1111111111 lilllllll IItVII11 Illllillfllllllll fl I 11111111 I{{1i111111111111 1111111111111111111111111 I11111111111!Ilill;lll Illt,il • _ Ilillllllllllllllllllllll IIIIIIIIII'Il'Il IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII fl 111111111111111111111a1 ! � PREVIOUS (IIIII I (IIIII j TRANSECTS BURROW IIIIIIIIIIL11t�iill (10 lllli1! ■ . IIIIIIIIIIIiII �' I (IIIII IIIIII:III 111111111111JIfIr.11i.if� II III ` _ , If111 111 I1 t I 11111111111111111111 • � �� I,: IIIIIIIIIIlIII111111111 . _-:�.. :ray'.. .� ,.-',•.- �-�'"• i _� I I I I II Igo at CAVITYSNAG 3 a* .... 11111111111111I11111111 - --,liz 0 to 1 44 01.g_ II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIJflllll � . _ F. J • � t. ,. am 'y .. 4" �rsf.l'r 4> ��I (IIIIIIIIIItII{fII,�, III `ter` I I I I I 'CAVIT �Ililllf{Illllr Iva, mmL-1 `M Ili ii IlSNAG 4 ll ■ ti Y ME kk ski a IF I ` 1 FFFI ) two / v _ r ■ 1 \ > sews : \ �� For } FIIF Off 4k IF of Flo FF 10 l ,e MAI , offa�r — yr j IF Ow off . to a to Or tv I N4 IF to l 4C mot. *�r L - ;1I l 4 -MOF Stool IF of 6 POP `F to to If PROPOSED IV I F M CLEARINGa. -W off foot �` ,/ ' II tool �. OFF, F-d IF, t to If Its Via• '°`.a �r �' , �'' �' 1 r. ..,r " _ }4-4 IF OFF of .:; Fir 44 OFF Of L too _' , _ „ ��`ff�� fl�• A` „-� - - 'iti y�� _ '+/ �. 04* 1i/ _J~ _ �4J* f Y do' .� riy. _ �{'. , � r....t �, 1 iyS �.a� _.� /r }'� ,.piaook'' *,r# � 1 ,`7 �T r - T r ,�q � _ For Lao F. .ez N410 IF FOOD IF Of For IF to lif OF. IF TRANSECTS �'1.- w _y i ice' LL1.to - .v r 4.. ✓ — ,..'3r '••` .* ►�. - •gyp �4 r . • s 'F . �Y•. . Or p For Of 4now, 0t' �%; i` I may: �. jel o OFF. of gpo k If off L /FF Foe • �STORMWATER woff IF LL If Alk folk�+ �r i rr' ,r' .� I of Of F OFF 4 !f to IF ft Or OWN Irvpie of d •. low, Il rIF I Flow r off//� • !� AL Oa IF A. Off IFF OF OF ..y,,+ of•t• f c ..N. For F.:IV 4a. For�.tOf IF IF ad move It I AL Fit FFIFFIF 1 47 ow FOOD, !! _ .Wirt } f - zoo Turrell, Halt • Associates,►�®asp v TURRELL, HALL & ASSOCIATES, INC. 3584 Exchange Avenue, Naples, Florida 34104 • Office (239) 643-0166 • Nick@thanaples.com Nicholas Pearson is a Biologist and Project Manager at Terrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. His responsibilities include marine resource surveys, marine -related permitting, terrestrial resource surveys and associated permitting, and due diligence work for both marine and terrestrial in-house projects. EXPERIENCE &REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS �2017 -Present) Wetland Permitting -Active participation in several hundred wetland assessments Or delineations per methodology followed by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, South Florida Water Management District, and many of the local municipalities throughout South Florida for the purposes of single-family, multifamily and commercial construction. �2017 -Present, Compliance and Enforcement Resolution- Provided assistance on numerous single- family, multifamily, and commercial projects with outstanding ERP-related non-compliance issues. �2019 -Present) Veteran's Memorial Parkway Extension- Provided wetland delineation and listed species survey work for the proposed road extension project. (2021) 01de Naples Seaport- Provided the submerged resource survey of the existing facility for proposed dredging plans. �2022 - 2023 the city limits, EDUCATION of Marco Island- Provided listed species permitting for several public parks within • 2013 B.S. Marine Science- Eckerd College ORGANIZATIONS • Florida Association Of Environmental Professionals- Southwest Florida Chapter • Marine Industries Association of Collier County LICENSES • Authorized Gopher Tortoise Agent DIVE CERTIFICATIONS • Advanced Open Water • Rescue Diver, Nitrox • Open Water PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE • Biologist I of Animal Health Team and Assistant Biologist of Quarantine Team- Florida Aquarium 2013-2015 • Shark Ecology- Bimini Biological Field Station 2013 • Intern Mote Marine Lab 2012 Exhibit V.D.1 Narrative, Justification and Supplemental Information Immokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict Existing Conditions and "it it Land Uses The subject property is located adjacent to and. south of Immokalee Road, approximately 773 feet west of the intersection of Immokalee Road and Randall Boulevard and is comprised of three parcels that total ±9.84 acres in size. Two of the parcels are undeveloped. One parcel is currently owned by Collier County. The County cleared this parcel of vegetation to use for dry retention for Immokalee Road. The site is within the Golden Gate Area Master Plan, Rural Golden Gate Estates. The land use designation is currently Estates — Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict. The property is zoned Estates, allowing for low density residential development and limited agricultural activities. The surrounding lands to the north, south, and west are designated Estates —Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict. Lands to the east are designated Estates — Commercial District, Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict. The zoning and existing land use on the surrounding lands is as follows: North South: Across Immokalee Road, zoned Estates residential estate lot and undeveloped. — ST/W-4, developed single-family Zoned Estates — ST/W-3 & ST/W4developed single-family residential estate lots. East: Across a canal, zoned Estates (Conditional Use) — ST/W-4, North Collier Fire West: Zoned Estates — ST/W-3, undeveloped. A portion of the subject site (3.79 acres) is owned. by Collier County and used. to provide stormwater management for Immokalee Road. This County parcel is known as Pond 8. The applicant, GM Advisors, LLC, owns a parcel to the east and south of Pond 8, that consists of 5.0 Acres and fronts a drainage discharge canal. The applicant has proposed to exchange the aforementioned parcel for Pond 8. The swap proposal was independently evaluated by Jacobs Engineering on behalf of Collier County. Several scenarios were evaluated to assess the potential impacts of the pond swap as proposed by the existing permit and standard practices. It was determined that the proposed swap of the County Pond 8, tract 36, unit 23 consisting of 3.79 Acres with GM Advisors, LLC Parcel, Tract 52, unit 23 consisting of 5.0 Acres is very adequate. As well, Tract 52 has frontage along a major drainage canal which may be helpful in cases of severe weather conditions/ hurricanes. As part of the swap, the applicant has proposed to prepare final design plans, obtain the necessary permits to construct the future pond site and install the necessary piping (to the degree necessary, Collier County agrees to be the co -applicant for the permitting). Once the proposed drainage pond is relocated and functional, Collier County will deed the current pond site (the 3.79 acres pond site tract 36, unit 23) to GM Advisors, LLC with a fee simple deed/title. GM Advisors, LLC will simultaneously deed (the 5.0 acres Parcel Tract 52, unit 23) new pond site to Collier County with a fee simple deed/title. Page 1 of 7 H:\2023\2023025\WP\GMPA\Resubmittal\Exhibit V.D.1 —Narrative and Justification (7-25-2023).docx The remainder of the subject site is undeveloped. Requested Changes The proposed GMPA establishes the Immokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict to allow for 125,000 square feet of gross leasable floor area (GLFA) of C-3 commercial uses of the C-3 — Commercial Intermediate District, of which up to 80,000 square feet of GLFA may consist of Indoor Air -Conditioned Mini and Self -Storage (SIC 4225). There is a companion PUD rezoning (PL-20230002458) to ensure compliance with the GMP and the proposed subdistrict. Justification The subject property is within the Immokalee Rd. Randall. Blvd. Study Area, which Collier County concluded to be an appropriate area for the commercial uses necessary to accommodate future growth within the Rural Golden Gate Estates. The property has frontage along Immokalee Road and is adjacent to non-residential uses and the Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict to the east; and is approximately 807' south of the Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict which allows for a variety of commercial, office and residential land uses. As a result, the proposed amendment is consistent with this policy in that it reduces urban sprawl and contains commercial uses in a semi -rural area to a location that is adjacent to existing commercial development. The proposed development will satisfy the increase in retail demand over the next five (5) years for the surrounding area. Retail market expenditures potential is forecasted to be $411,785,656 in ific types of retail uses identified for the Subject Site and the next five (5) years. In addition, spec their related expenditures will grow over $23 million over the same time period. The subdistrict is strategically located to take advantage of the future retail demand and the traffic flowing along Immokalee Road and will make significant economic contributions to Collier County in terms of new salaries and wages plus sales and property taxes. The Project will also provide self -storage square feet that will satisfy the projected demand for self -storage space that will accompany the population growth within the three-mile market area and the demand that will be coming from the fringe areas around the three-mile market area. The demand for self -storage in the three (3)-mile market area is currently 157,515 square feet with no existing supply. There is a proposed 64,314 square foot self -storage facility in the proposed Randall Road mixed use development, which is estimated to be built in 2024. If both the self - storage facility within the Randall Road mixed use development and the potential 80,000 square feet GLFA storage facility within this subdistrict are constructed, the self -storage market area will still have a demand deficit of 37,674 square feet in 2025 growing to a demand deficit of 36,874 square feet in the 2033 horizon year. Consistency with Florida Statutes Section 163.3177(6)(a)2, Florida Statutes: 2. The future land use plan and plan amendments shall be based upon surveys, studies, and data regarding the area, as applicable, including: Page 2 of 7 H:\2023\2023025\WP\GMPA\Resubmittal\Exhibit V.D.1 —Narrative and Justification (7-25-2023).docx a. The amount of land required to accommodate anticipated growth. b. The projected permanent and seasonal population of the area. c. The character of undeveloped land. d. The character of water supplies, public facilities, and services. e. The need for redevelopment, including the renewal of blighted areas and the elimination of nonconforming uses which are inconsistent with the character of the community. f. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to or closely proximate to military installations. g. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to an airport as defined in s. 330.35 and consistent with s. 333.02. h. The discouragement of urban sprawl. i. The need for job creation, capital investment, and economic development that will strengthen and diverse the community's economy. j. The need to modem land uses and development patterns within antiquated subdivisions. The subdistrict is not located. within proximity to a military installation or adjacent to an airport. Paragraphs f and g, above, do not apply. With respect to paragraphs a, b, c, and. d, please see the Commercial Needs Analysis submitted. with this GMPA application. Relative to paragraphs h, I, and j, this property is appropriate for the conversion to allow for commercial uses and does not encourage urban sprawl. The subject property is within the Collier County initiated Immokalee Rd. Randall Blvd. Planning Study area, which consists of approximately 277 acres ±9 miles east and +8.5 miles north of I75. The purpose of this study was to evaluate existing and future conditions, and recommendations for the study area and establish guiding principles for the development of the area. The completed study concluded that this is an appropriate area for future commercial growth to serve the surrounding community. This GMPA will allow for the commercial growth necessary while protecting adjacent land uses. Furthermore, the additional commercial uses will provide an opportunity for job creation and economic growth. Section 163.3177(6)(a)8, Florida Statues: 8. Future land use map amendments shall be based upon the following analyses: a. An analysis of the availability of facilities and services. b. An analysis of the suitability of the plan amendment for its proposed use considering the character of the undeveloped land, soils, topography, natural resources, and historic resources on site. C. An analysis of the minimum amount of land needed to achieve the goals and requirements of this section. The proposed GMPA is consistent with the intent and procedural and substantive requirements set forth in the Florida Statute referenced above. In addition to the analysis found within this narrative, Page 3 of 7 H:\2023\2023025\WP\GMPA\Resubmittal\Exhibit V.D.1 —Narrative and Justification (7-25-2023).docx we have provided supporting documents which collectively constitute sufficient data and analysis to read that conclusion. Section 163.3187(1), Florida Statutes: 1. A small scale development amendment may be adopted under the following conditions: a. The proposed amendment involves a use of SO acres or fewer and.• Ehe proposed. amendment is limited in size to three parcels that total �9.84 acres in size. b. The proposed amendment does not involve a text change to the goals, policies, and objectives of the local government's comprehensive plan, but only proposes a land use change to the future land use map for a site -specific small scale development activity. However, text changes that relate directly to, and are adopted simultaneously with, the small scale future land use map amendment shall be permissible under this section. The amendment proposes to create a subdistrict to allow development of the subject property with the proposed commercial uses. The proposed text changes relate directly to this boundary change, allowing for the aforementioned commercial uses. c. The property that is the subject of the proposed amendment is not located within an area of critical state concern, unless the project subject to the proposed amendment involves the construction of affordable housing units meeting the criteria of S. 420.0004(3), and is located within an area of critical state concern designated by S. 380.0552 or by the Administration Commission pursuant to S. 380.OS(1). The subject property is not located within an area of critical concern. Consistency with GGAMP: Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element OBJECTIVE 1.1: Develop new or revised uses of land consistent with designations outlined on the Rural Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map and provision found in the Land Use Designation Description of this Sub -Element. The subject property is within the Immokalee Rd. Randall Blvd. Study Area, which Collier County concluded to be an appropriate area for the commercial uses necessary to accommodate future growth within the Rural Golden Gate Estates. The property has frontage along Immokalee Road and is adjacent to non-residential uses and the Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict to the east. Architectural standards, and increased setback and perimeter buffering required in the Estates will ensure preservation of and compatibility with adjacent rural neighborhoods. GOAL 3: TO PROVIDE FOR LIMITED COMMERCIAL SERVICES AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR PURPOSES OF SER VING THE R URAL NEEDS OF GOLDEN GATE ESTATES Page 4 of 7 H:\2023\2023025\WP\GMPA\Resubmittal\Exhibit V.D.1 —Narrative and Justification (7-25-2023).docx Ft 1 - , I • I I I • , I I I I ♦ • 7WARACTER, Policy 3.2.1: Within one year of the completion of the Randall Blvd. and Oil Well Rd. Corridor Study, the County Manager or designee shall initiate an evaluation of the future land uses along Immokalee Rd. in the vicinity of Randall Blvd., Oil Well Rd. and Wilson Blvd. (as generally shown on the Immokalee Rd./Randall Blvd. Planning Study Area Map) and make recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners for any proposed changes to the future land uses. The subject property is within the Collier County initiated. Immokalee Rd. Randall Blvd. Planning Study area, which consists of approximately 277 acres +9 miles east and ±5.5 miles north of I75. The purpose of this study was to evaluate existing and future conditions, and recommendations for the study area and establish guiding principles for the development of the area. The completed study concluded that this is an appropriate area for future commercial growth to serve the surrounding community and recommended a mixed -use subdistrict to encourage a mix of retail, restaurant, office, medium density residential, and civic/public uses. The subject property is not large enough to support mixed -use development, as commercial development within the estates requires increased setbacks and buffer areas when adjacent to Estates zoned parcels; however, the proposed subdistrict will provide the commercial goods and services needed to support the increasing density in the surrounding area. The Subdistrict fronts on Immokalee Road and is proposed for commercial uses. The site will. be designed with a pedestrian connection to the existing sidewalk on Immokalee Road, and the site will provide one or more bicycle racks. The proposed subdistrict will also aid in creating a walkable development pattern, as the subdistrict will allow for commercial destinations via a connection to the existing pedestrian facilities along Immokalee Road. The property is within walking distance (approximately half a mile west) of the southwestern corner of Valencia Lakes, a idential subdivision. As the County proceeds to implementation of the nearby res recommendations of the Immokalee Road/Randall Boulevard Planning Study (presumably through a GMP Overlay, and LDC Amendments, as may be acceptable to the Board of County Commissioners) there may be specific requirements related to promoting an enhanced multi -modal network. Please keep in mind that there are significant improvements planned for the intersection if Randall Blvd. and Immokalee Road, including, initially, surface improvements, and ultimately a grade separated intersection (or "flyover") is planned. We will particpate in all of these efforts, and presumably development on the subject property will be subject to any such applicable requirements; however, we cannot drive that process at this point. Consistency with GMP Future Land Use Element Policy 5.5: Discourage unacceptable levels of urban sprawl in order to minimize the cost of community facilities by: confining uNban intensity development to areas designated as Urban... Page 5 of 7 H:\2023\22023025\WP\GMPA\Resubmittal\Exhibit V.D.1 —Narrative and Justification (7-25-2023).docx The subject property is within the Immokalee Rd. Randall Blvd, Study Area, which Collier County concluded to be an appropriate area for the commercial uses necessary to accommodate future growth within the Rural Golden Gate Estates. The property has frontage along Immokalee Road and is adjacent to non-residential uses and the Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict to the east; and is approximately 807' south of the Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict which allows for a variety of commercial, office and residential land uses. As a result, the proposed amendment is consistent with this policy in that it reduces urban sprawl and contains commercial uses in a semi -rural area to a location that is adjacent to existing commercial development. Policy 5.6: New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code (Ordinance 0441, adopted June 22, 2004 and effective October 18, 2004, as amended). The proposed. uses are compatible with anal complementary to the surrounding land uses, which include a North Collier Fire Rescue District Station, commercial uses, and large lot residential development. Development standards and perimeter buffers proposed within the CPUD will ensure compatibility with neighboring properties. Policy 7.1: The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. In accordance with this policy, access is arterial roadway. proposed via a connection to Immokalee Road, a minor Policy 7.2: The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals. The subject site will utilize internal accesses and will connect to Immokalee Road, a minor arterial. roadway. Policy 7:3: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and/or interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. The interconnection of local streets between developments is also addressed in Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element. The subject site will utilize internal accesses and will connect to Immokalee Road, a minor arterial roadway. The property does not have frontage on local streets. The parcels to the south and west are developed with single-family residential and there is a canal along the eastern perimeter, Conservation and Coastal Management Element Policy 6.1.1: For the County's Urban Designated Area, Estates Designated Area, Conservation Designated Area, and Agricultural/Rural Mixed Use District, Rural -Industrial District and Rural - Settlement Area District as designated on the FL UM, native vegetation shall be preserved through Page 6 of 7 H:\2023\2023025\WP\GMPA\Resubtnittal\Exhibit V.D. l —Narrative and Justification (7-25-2023).docx the application of the following minimum preservation and vegetation retention standards and cNiteYia... Non -Coastal Hi h Hazard Area Commercial and Industrial Development Equal to or greater than S acres. 15% There are approximately 5.86 acres of native vegetation present on the site. In accordance with this policy, the project will retain approximately 0.88 acres of existing native vegetation There will be a 50' wide native vegetation retention area along the southern perimeter and a 25' wide native vegetation retention area along the western perimeter. OBJECTIVE 7.1: Direct incompatible land uses away from listed animal species and their habitats. (The County relies on the listing process of State and Federal agencies to identify species that require special protection because of their endangered, threatened, or species of special concern status. Listed animal species are those species that the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission has designated as endangered, threatened, or species of special concern, in accordance with Rules 68A-27.003, 68A-27.004, and 68A-27.005, F.A.C. and those species designated by various federal agencies as Endangered and Threatened species published in SO CFR 17.) According to the Listed Species assessment provided. with this GMPA, there is no evidence or indication that the site is being utilized by any listed species. The 50' wide native vegetation retention area along the southern perimeter and a 25' wide native vegetation retention area along the western perimeter will ensure that suitable habitat will be present on site to direct wildlife from the proposed land uses. Transportation Element Policy 9.3: The County shall encourage projects which provide local resident, pedesti^ian, bicyclist and motorist movement between and among developments on neighborhood stNeets in a deliberate balance with its efforts to route cut -through traffic away fi^om neighborhoods and to the arterials and collectors designated in this Transportation Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. The subject site will utilize internal accesses and will connect to Till mokalee Road, a minor arterial roadway. The property does not have frontage on local streets. The parcels to the south are developed with single-family residential and there is a canal along the eastern perimeter, making interconnection unfeasible. The Master Plan allows for an interconnection to the west if the property is developed with non-residential uses. An internal system of sidewalks will be utilized to facilitate pedestrian and bicycle movement. This system will connect to the existing sidewalk along Immokalee Road. Page 7 of 7 H:\2023\2023025\WP\GMPA\Resubmittal\Exhibit V.D.1 —Narrative and Justification (7-25-2023).docx �� 1 � I'll EXHIBIT V.E.I PUBLIC FACILITIES REPORT The proposed subdistrict does not authorize residential development and does not increase population within the County. Therefore, no significant increased demands on public facilities will occur as a result of approving this request. Collier County Utilities will provide water service for potable and fire protection needs, as well as wastewater service. There is an existing water line and force main to the north of the project, across Immokalee Road. Collier County Public Utilities has sufficient plant capacity to provide water and sewer services. According to the Collier County 2022 AUIR, currently the Collier County Landfill has a total remaining permitted capacity of 12,906,476 tons, and a ten-year permitted capacity requirement of 2,906,534 tons. The estimated life of the landfill is 40 years. This is adequate to accommodate expected tons per capita generated by the proposed prof ect. Stormwater retention and detention will comply with SFWMD standards for off -site discharges will be met, resulting management (drainage) level of service. The site does ditches, or stormwater control structures, n i requirements, and State and County no adverse impacts to stormwater not affect County -maintained canals, No residential development is approved through the subdistrict; therefore, there are no impacts to level of service for schools. The proposed subdistrict will not increase the population and will not increase demands for emergency medical services or county parks and recreation services. An EMS/fire station is located adjacent to the east of the site at 13240 Immokalee Road. The subject site is within the North Collier Fire Rescue District. The proposed amendment does not create any adverse impacts to the area roadway network. The roadway network is projected to operate above the Level of Service (LOS) standard with or without the project at future build -out conditions. Please see the attached Traffic Analysis for transportation impacts and further details. Page 1 of 1 H:\2023\2023025\WP\GMPA\Resubmittal\Exhibit V.E. l -Public Facilities Report (7-25-2023).docx EXHIBIT • . . . . _ • • I iv am Pat 1 r. B-T." a" am Prepared for: Hole Montes &Associates 950 Encore Way Naples, FL 34110 Phone: 239-254-2000 Collier Coun Collier County, Florida �/21/Zo23 Prepared by: Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 2800 Davis Boulevard, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239-566-9551 all: ntrebilcock� Em trebilcock.bi z Transportation Methodology Fee* — $500.00 Fee Collier County Transportation Review Fee* —Major Study — $1,500.00 Fee Note — *to be collected at time of first submittal. Immokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict— GMPA &PUDZApplication — Traffic Impact Statement —July 2023 I certify that this Traffic Impact Statement has been prepared by me or under my immediate supervision and that I have experience and training in the field of Traffic and Transportation Engineering. 2:•• No 47116 �'.• STATE OF00400609 Digitally signed by Norman Trebilcock DN: c=US, st=Florida, 1=Naples, o=Norman Trebilcock, cn=Norman Trebilcock, email=ntrebilcock@trebilcock.biz Date: 2023.07.21 1 /010:44-04'00' Norman Trebilcock, Al PE, PTOE FL Registration No. 47116 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 2800 Davis Boulevard, Suite 200 Naples, FL34104 Company Cert. of Auth. No. 27796 PRINTED COPIES OF THIS DOCUMENT ARE NOT CONSIDERED SIGNED AND SEALED AND THE SIGNATURE MUST BE VERIFIED ON ANY ELECTRONIC COPIES. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 2 1mmOkalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict— GMPA &PODZ Application — Traffic Impact Statement —July 2023 ProjectDescription........................................................................................................................ a 4 Tr i p . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Trip Distribution and Assignment.............................................................................. 5 ............. ........ FUtl,lre BaCkgroUnd Traffic VoIUmeS............................................................................................... 8 Existing and Future Roadway Conditions Without Project............................................................ 8 Future Conditions With Project.................................................................................................... 10 Site Access Management.............................................................................................................. 12 ImprovementAnalysis.................................................................................................................. 12 Mitigationof Impact..................................................................................................................... 12 Appendices Appendix A: Project Master Site Plan.......................................................................................... 13 Appendix B: Initial Meeting Checklist (Methodology Meeting) .................................................. 15 Appendix C: ITE Trip Generation.............................................................. Appendix D: FDOT Generalized Level of Service Table...... 0 asseessee 8 00 @**sea ago a a age* seem moves* assess 33 Appendix E: FDOT Site Impact Handbook......... as Osseo wasseasse a assessesse soma Sasso a swumose was a a a assesses@ B Appendix F: D1RPM Facilities in Vicinity...................................................................................... 38 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page ( 3 ICnMOKolee Randall Commercial Subdistrict— 6MPA &PUDZApplicotion — Traffic Impact Statement —July 2023 Project Description The subject property is located on the south side of Immokalee Road, approximately 773 feet west of the intersection of Immokalee Road and Randall Boulevard and comprises three parcels that total ±9.82 acres in size. Two of the parcels are undeveloped. One parcel is currently owned by Collier County. The County cleared this parcel of vegetation to use for dry retention for Immokalee Rd. The proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) establishes the Immokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict to allow for 125,000 square feet of &3 commercial uses, of which up to 80,000 square feet may consist of Indoor Air -Conditioned Mini and Self -Storage. There is a companion PUD rezoning to ensure compliance with the GMP and the proposed subdistrict. Refer to Figure 1—Project Location and Appendix A: Project Master Site Plan. Immokalee Rd Figure 1—Project Location Project Location ` Vlerket . {�dI1S�3�S S►V{i a Apexx Access Automal CD G Oil Well Rd Randall Blvd Next Generation i=ar,�ily Daycare H©me blest Coast Ge►�eratar N Rarrlall B'::� A methodology memorandum was transmitted via email to the Collier County Transportation Planning staff on April 21, 2023 (ref. Appendix B: Initial Meeting Checklist (Methodology Meeting)). The project access connections to the surrounding roadway network consist of two connections onto Immokalee Rd. The specific project proposed that requires the amendment is expected to be fully constructed and occupied within a few years. The analysis year is 2028. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 4 I nMOKalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict— GMPA &PUDZApplication — Traffic Impact Statement —July 2023 Trip Generation While the proposed amendment is to allow up to 125,000 SF of C-3 uses, the trip generation in Table 1 is for 100,000 SF of mixed retail and is intended to depict the highest and best use and establish the trip cap for the PUD at 389 PM peak hour two-way. Appendix C contains the result for 45,000 SF of mixed retail and 80,000 Sf of self -storage facility. It also contains ITE rates or equations used for the trip generation calculations, as applicable, the ITE formulae coefficients and 11t" edition data pages. In agreement with the Collier County TIS guidelines, significantly impacted roadways are identified based on the proposed project highest peak hour trip generation (net new total trips) and consistent with the peak hour of the adjacent street traffic. Based on the information contained in the Collier County 2022 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR), the peak hour for the adjacent roadway network is PM peak hour. Table 1-Trip Generation Trip Distribution and Assignment Trip distribution was estimated using the Collier County Adopted 2045 Cost Feasible network in the District One Regional Planning Model (D1RPM) modified as follows: 1. Reflecting changes in the vicinity requested by Collier County during the analysis of the Town of Big Cypress; and 2. Reflecting on the number of lanes consistent with construction funding in the current Collier County 5-Year Work Program. The resulting facility type, area type and number of lanes are depicted in Appendix F. Anew traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ)# 2970 was attached to Immokalee Rd. at the project location containing 300 commercial employees (3 per 1000 SF recommended by FDOT Site Impact Handbook -see Appendix E). The percentage distribution pattern for project traffic is shown in Figure 2. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � S Immokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict- GMPA &PUDZApplication - Traffic Impact Statement -July 2023 ' North Figure 2 -Project Trip Distribution I^ 2.6 in 0 'v 0 Immokalee Rd 7.5 6.7 6Y Oil Well Rd 16.8 16.1 N N Project Immokalee Rd N ocation Randall Blvd 20.2 16.2 4�b 11.1 ` 22.4� 20.5 A -' 12.3 24.4 9 5 9.5 `n t0 V a o 0 0 � CDo o0 rn � o � It Beach Rd Ext. Vanderbilt _ 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 o 1.7 2.5 3.9 2.4 0 n o ## Percent of External Pro•ect Traffic 2.6 O 0 2.3 0 Golden Gate blvd C�7 0 6.1 6.7 0 16.1 N Q1 w V 1.4 5.3 6.1 53 1z 0.4 6.1 2.9 0 0 r 6.1 U .�J 5.3 0 w 0 Number of Lanes 2 4 6 8 - 10 Facility Type Toll Facilities Freeways & Ramps Minor & Major Arterials Collectors Centroid Connectors Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 6 IrnnlOKalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict- GMPA &PUDZApplication - Traffic Impact Statement -July 2023 Table 2 contains the road segments on which the project impact was reviewed. Roadway configuration and minimum standard service volumes are from the 2022 AUIR. The distribution percentages are the averages of those at the segment endpoints shown in Figure 2. The calculations that Table 2 contains are performed with more decimal places than those displayed. Using only the displayed decimals may yield slightly different results. The project significantly impacts some roadway segments in the vicinity. Table 2 -Project Traffic Distribution and PM Peak Hour Impact Peak Direct - Peak ion Hour Project PM PM Peak Traffic Percent Peak Peak LOS Direct- Signif- as Per - of Total Hour Hour Mini- ion icance centage Signif- Project Project Project Config- mum Service Thres- of icant AUIR Roadway Traffic Traffic Traffic uration Im- Stan- Volume hold Service Impact ID # Link From To (1) N/E (2) S/W (2) (3) proved dard (3) (%) (4) Volume Y/N Immokalee Wilson Project 45.0 24.4 46 49 6D No E 3300 2 1.5 No Road Boulevard Entrances Immokalee Project Randall 45.0 75.6 150 144 6D No E 3300 2 4.5 Yes Road Entances Boulevard Immokalee Randall Oil Well 45.0 48.7 97 92 6D No E 3300 2 2.9 Yes Road Boulevard Road Immokalee Oil Well 39th Ave 46.0 24.1 48 46 4D No D 2000 3 2.4 No Road Road NE Immokalee 39th Ave 47th Ave 46.0 1901 38 36 2U No D 900 3 4.2 Yes Road NE NE Immokalee 47th Ave Everglades 46.0 10.8 21 21 2U No D 900 3 2.3 No Road NE Blvd. Vanderbilt 118.0 Wilson Blvd Immokalee Beach 8.3 16 16 2U No D 900 2 1.8 No Road Road Ext. Oil Well Immokalee Everglades 119.0 16.5 33 31 4D No D 2200 3 1.5 No Road Road Boulevard Randall Immokalee 8th Street 132.0 22.4 45 42 2U No D 900 2 5.0 Yes Boulevard Road NE Randall 8th Street Everglades 132.0 18.4 37 34 2U No D 900 3 4.1 Yes Boulevard NE Blvd. Randall Everglades Desoto 133.0 2.9 6 5 2U No D 900 3 0.7 No Boulevard Boulevard Boulevard Everglades Randall Oil Well 135.0 1.5 3 3 2U No D 800 3 0.4 No Boulevard Boulevard Road Vanderbilt Everglades Randall 135.0 Beach 7.6 14 16 2U No D 800 3 2.0 No Boulevard Boulevard Road Ext. Everglades Oil Well Immokalee 136.0 2.4 5 4 2U No D 800 3 0.6 No Boulevard Road Road Notes: 1) Average of segment endpoint values in Figure 2 2) Percentage times PM peak hour net new external directional project traffic totals Table 1 3) Based on 2022 AUIR data 4) Collier County TIS Guidelines Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page ( 7 ll'1'In OKolee Randall Commercial Subdistrict— G1VlPA &PUDZApplication — Traffic Impact Statement —July 2023 Tables 3 through 5 contain information for the significantly impacted roadway segments in Table 2 demonstrating their current and future levels of service. In Table 3, the annual growth rate listed is the one used in the 2022 AUIR to predict future deficiencies and is used to inflate the existing year peak hour peak direction volume from the 2022 AUIR for the first five years, with two percent growth (consistent with the method used in the AUIR) thereafter. The result above is compared with the 2022 AUIR volume plus the trip bank volume. The higher of the two results is used as the future background traffic volume. The calculations that Table 3 contains are performed with more decimal places than those displayed. Using only the displayed decimals may yield slightly different results. Table 3 —Future Background Traffic 2028 2028 Growth Rate Existing Based Peak Year Peak Hour Peak AUIR Hour Peak Hour Annual Peak Direct - Peak Percent Direction ion Back- Direct- Growth Trip Back- AUIR + ground ion Peak Rate for Growth Bank ground Trip Traffic AUIR Roadway Volume Direct- First 5 Factor Volume Traffic Bank Volume ID # Link From To (1) ion (1) years (1) (2) (1) Volume Volume (3) Immokalee Project Randall 45.0 2020 E 2.0% 1.126 498 2275 2518 2518 Road Entances Boulevard Immokalee Randall Oil Well 45.0 2020 E 2.0% 1.126 498 2275 2518 2518 Road Boulevard Road Immokalee 39th Ave 47th Ave 46.0 510 E 4.0% 1.241 252 633 762 762 Road NE NE Randall Immokalee 8th Street 132.0 780 E 2.0% 1.126 25 878 805 878 Boulevard Road NE Randall 8th Street Everglades 132.0 780 E 2.0% 1.126 25 878 805 878 Boulevard INE I Blvd. Notes: 1) 2022 AUIR 2) Growth Factor assumes 2% annual growth after the first 5 years. 3) Greater of Growth based estimate or Existing + Trip Bank The existing roadway conditions are from the Collier County 2022 AUIR, and the future roadway conditions are based on the current Collier County 5-Year Work Program. Roadway improvements that are currently under construction, scheduled to be constructed within the five-year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) or Capital Improvement Program (CIP) are considered committed improvements. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 8 Immokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict— GMPA &PUDZApplication — Traffic Impact Statement —July 2023 This includes the improvement of the Immokalee Rd./Randall Blvds intersection that is reflected here by treating the segment from Immokalee Rd. to 8t" St NE as a four lane facility. For any existing roads scheduled for improvement, the roadway service volumes in the improved condition are the Collier County AUIR unimproved condition service volume multiplied by the ratio of LOS D service volumes shown in FDOT Generalized Service Volume Table 7 (Urban Condition, Class I Arterial, Appendix D) between the improved and unimproved cross sections (product rounded to the nearest hundred). Ex ratios: • 2 lanes to 4 = 2,000/880 = 2.27 • 2 lanes to 6 = 3,020/880 = 3.43 • 4 lanes to 6 = 3,020/2,000 = 1.51 That ratio isolates the effect of the additional lanes while keeping all other factors affecting service volumes constant. The effect of all those other factors is reflected in the County's published service volume in the unimproved condition and explains its relation to the average for all roads of like cross section. The existing and future roadway conditions are illustrated in Table 4. The segments are operating at acceptable level of service in existing conditions and under future background traffic conditions. The calculations that Table 4 contains are performed with more decimal places than those displayed. Using only the displayed decimals may yield slightly different results. Table 4 —Existing and Future Roadway Conditions 2022 2028 2028 2028 2028 2028 Existing Existing Peak Peak Year Peak Hour Hour Peak Level Hour Peak Level Peak Hour of Peak Direct- of Direct- Peak Service Direct- ion Back Service Existing ion Direct- Exist- Defic- Future ion ground Back- Defic- Config- Service ion ing iency Config- Service Traffic ground iency AUIR Roadway uration Volume Volume Year Yes/ uration Im- Volume Volume Traffic Yes/ ID # Link From To (1) (1) (1) V/C No (1) proved (1) (2) V/C No Immokalee Project Randall 45.0 6D 3300 2020 0.61 No 6D No 3300 2518 0.76 No Road Entances Boulevard Immokalee Randall Oil Well 45.0 6D 3300 2020 0.61 No 6D No 3300 2518 0.76 No Road Boulevard Road Immokalee 47th Ave 46.0 39th Ave NE 2U 900 510 0.57 No 2U No 900 762 0.85 No Road NE Randall Immokalee 8th Street 132.0 2U 900 780 0.87 No 4D Yes 2000 878 0.44 No Boulevard Road NE Randall 8th Street Everglades 132.0 2U 900 780 0.87 No 2U No 900 878 0.98 No Boulevard 1NE I Blvd. Notes: 1) Based on 2022 AUIR data and approved future roadway improvements 2) Table 3 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 9 Immokalee Randall commercial Subdistrict— GMPA &PUDZApplication — Traffic Impact Statement —July 2023 Future Conditions With Project Table 5 adds the project traffic volumes developed in Table 2 to the 2028 background traffic volumes developed in Table 3. In the cases where the peak direction of project traffic aligns with the peak direction of background traffic, the background traffic portion of the total traffic is the peak hour peak direction volume from Table 3. In the cases where the two peak directions (background and project) are opposed, a D factor of 0.56 is assumed for the background traffic, the average of the values used for interrupted flow facilities in the FDOT Generalized Service Volume Table for Urbanized Areas (see Appendix D). This factor is used to estimate the background two-way volume, and hence to establish the two directional components of that two-way volume. Directional project traffic volumes from Table 2 are added and the maximum of the resulting two total traffic directional volumes is used as the basis of analysis. The calculations that Table 5 contains are performed with more decimal places than those displayed. Using only the displayed decimals may yield slightly different results. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 10 (D C" c� O n 717 O ool LA C r+ rQ V) O o' Mmi Cr 2028 2028 2028 2028 Peak Hour Peak Direct- Peak Level ion Back- PM PM Back- Hour of r� tJ'1 0 v O a� A 0 Immokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict— GMPA &PUDZApplicarion — Traffic Impact Statement —July 2023 The project traffic causes a level of service deficiency on the segment of Randall Blvd. from 8t" St NE to Everglades Blvd. • ♦ •111111 W• • • The proposed access for the project is an eastbound right in/right out connection to Immokalee Rd. at the western end of the parcel (see Appendix A) and right-out/emergency access at the eastern end. Immokalee Rd. is considered an Access Class 3 facility with a posted speed limit of 45 mph. As such the minimum spacing requirement is 660 feet. A detailed evaluation of applicable access points will be performed at the time of site development permitting/platting when more specific development parameters will be made available. Based on the results illustrated within this traffic analysis, the proposed project creates a significant impact on adjacent roadway segments. Most of the analyzed roadway network facilities have sufficient capacity to accommodate the proposed project. On Randall Blvd. from 8t" A NE to Everglades Blvd the project traffic creates a deficiency in 2028. The ROW acquisition for this segment is funded in FY 23. No further phases show funding in the adopted work program. The maximum total daily trip generation for the proposed development shall not exceed 389 two-way PM peak hour net new trips, based on the land use codes in the ITE Trip Generation Manual in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval, as applicable. Mitigation of Impact The developer proposes to conduct a proportionate share analysis and pay the resulting amount if it exceeds expected impact fees or pay the appropriate Collier County Road Impact Fee as building permits are issued for the project, as applicable. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 12 Irnmokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict— GMPA &PUD2Application — Traffic Impact Statement —July 2023 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 13 WWI C' mmmmmmmm n 0 D Ln r-=r' rq L/) O O D 11 � I I ¢I Q U ., SCAwE IN 7EET el z 1 N ZONING: E-ST/V1l-4 '� O r.: ' ' LAND USE: UNDEVELOPED wo Z� 11wFes. gyp. O `>> f , p 'ow, ZONING: E-ST/W--4 O� ........w LAND USE: SINGLE-FAMILY f r f RESIDENTIAL f ---- fGAN= f r mmm� J_ 0-0 f�- - -•-• • ... --wl aw - -- -------- GHT-�NfRIGHY r-- r+~ II I aSz Rl i Q --- - ----- OUT ONLY IN r L � W w G w 0 O monj w n z wW �Wn zo zz og 25.0' RETAINED NATIVE VEG ETATI O N BUFFER i ZONING: E-ST/W 3 LAND USE: SINGLE-FAMILY ! RESIDENTIAL TRACT C �1 (DEVELOPABLE AREA TRACT B IMMOKALEE RANDALL CPUD 50.0' RETAINED NATIVE VEGETATION BUFFER 15.0 ENHANCED TYPE D LBE �I I �I I I �I 76.0' it DRAINAGE EASEMENT ZONING: E-ST/VI!-4 LAND USE: FUTURE COLLIER COUNTY STORM WATER MANAGEMENT LAKE H.A+L 4:'2023 QL MONTES � I I ZONING: E-ST/V11-4 (CU) LAND USE: NORTH COLLIER FIRE RESCUE I 'DISTRICT STATION 10 5.0'TYPEA LBE ' 20.0' ACCESS TO COUNTY OVVN E D I PARCEL FOR I CANAL MAINT. owl I LAND USE SUMMARY (RETAINED NATIVE VEGETATION BUFFER) TRACT B 1.24 AC TRACT C 8.62 AC TOTAL 9.86 AC MIN. OPEN SPACE REQUIRED/PROVIDED (30%): 3.13 AC MIN. NATIVE VEGETATION RETENTION REQUIREDIPROVIDED: 0.88 AC TRACT B RETAINS NATIVE VEGETATION &SHALL PROVIDE THE REQUIRED , MINIMUM NATIVE VEGETATION RETENTION OF 0.88 AC 1.+:r rOPTXS?.:Gfl EXHIBIT C MASTER PLAN I LAND USE SUMMARY (RETAINED NATIVE VEGETATION BUFFER) TRACT B 1.24 AC TRACT C 8.62 AC TOTAL 9.86 AC MIN. OPEN SPACE REQUIRED/PROVIDED (30%): 3.13 AC MIN. NATIVE VEGETATION RETENTION REQUIREDIPROVIDED: 0.88 AC TRACT B RETAINS NATIVE VEGETATION &SHALL PROVIDE THE REQUIRED , MINIMUM NATIVE VEGETATION RETENTION OF 0.88 AC 1.+:r rOPTXS?.:Gfl EXHIBIT C MASTER PLAN MIN. OPEN SPACE REQUIRED/PROVIDED (30%): 3.13 AC MIN. NATIVE VEGETATION RETENTION REQUIREDIPROVIDED: 0.88 AC TRACT B RETAINS NATIVE VEGETATION &SHALL PROVIDE THE REQUIRED , MINIMUM NATIVE VEGETATION RETENTION OF 0.88 AC 1.+:r rOPTXS?.:Gfl EXHIBIT C MASTER PLAN Immokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict— GMPA &PUDZApplication — Traffic Impact Statement —July 2023 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 15 Imn'lokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict— GMPA &PUD2Application — Traffic Impact Statement —July 2023 Suggestion: Ilse this ,A�ppendi:c as a worksheet to ensure that no hnportai�t elements azre overlooked. Cross out the items that do not apply, or N/A (not applicable). Date:ri121.2, i�23 Titne: N/.A Location: N/A — Via Email People Attending: Name, Organization, and Telephone Numbers 1) �►lichael Sabi 2) Norman Trebilcock, TCS 3) Gavin .Tones, TCS �) Ciprian Malaescu, TCS Study Prepares Preparer's Name and Title: Norman Trebilcock. AICP. PE Organization: Trebilcock Consulting Solutions. PA Address & Telephone Number: 2800 Davis Boulevard. Suite 200, Naples, FL 34104; ph 239-566-9551 Reviewer(s): Reviewer's Name & Title: Michael SawyTer Organization & Telephone Number: Collier County Transportation Development Review 239-252-2926 Applicant: Applicant's Name: Hole Montes Address: 950 Encore Way. Naples, FL 34110 Telephone Number: 239-254-2000 Proposed Development. Name: hnmokalee Randall Sub District Location: South side of Immokalee Rd. 012roximately 773 feet west of the intersection of I nmokalee Rd. and Randall Blvd. (refer to Figure 1) Land Use Type: C-3 Commercial Uses. ITE Code #: LUC 821 — Shopping Plaza 40K-150K without Supermarket, LUC 151 — ini-Warehotise. Page 1 of 6 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 16 Irr)mokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict— GMP,4 &PUDZApplication — Traffic Impact Statement —July 2023 Dcscl-iption: 125,000 sgtlarc feet (SF} of C-3 L?ses. atee I .S Figure 1— Projecfi Locafiion Map [Atli A� NE ZUI11I1 E�15t1116: Estates- -lined Use District, Residential Compreliens1Ve plan recommendation: N/A. Requested: zvel Kendall �Ivb es Subdistrict. Gro`Nrth Mallacyement Plan Amendment (G�1PA to allow for up to 125,UUU SF of C-3 llsc;s. :7. anci Pl,�nnecl I ?nit Filldillgs of the Prelill�inary Study: StLldy type: Tile projected net el-ternal AI�-I or Ph12-��ay peak hour project traffic is more tllall lUU. SO this studj' ualifies as a XZajor TIS. Proposed TIS «'ill IllcllldZ trip �ellet'1t10I1, tl'aff1C dlsti'illtltl011 alld a.Ssl�ilnlZllts. s1�111�1cal1CZ test (basedcriterion}. Operational site access analysis to be perforllled at the timz of'site development plats application. 1�lle repol-t x.x ill proV ide esistin� LOS and doctllllent the impact tlla proposed project ��jill slave on designated �u-terial and collector roads. will] IZOad�Vam` cOnC111�I'Z11C` analysis -- b; ei Z�[cl�tla rlllc TIS shall be consistent withh Collier County J IS Citlldellllcs and I'rUGCdtll•eS. c Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 17 Immokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict— GMPA &PUD2Application — Traffic Impact Statement —July 2023 Site access is �=ia access f'ron� Inuno�.alee R.d. Internal capture is not applicable and tlne pass-b�� rate is based on ITE and Collier County . . , . 4 Study Typc: (if not. net increase, operational study) Small Scale TIS ❑ Minor TIS ❑ Major TIS Study Area: Boundaries: Arterial and Collector roads significantl, impacted. Additional intersections to be analyzed: NIA Build Out Year: 2028 Planning Horizon Fear: 2028 Analysis Time Period(s): PM peak hour Future tiff --Site Developments: N/A Source of Trip Generation dates: ITE Trip Generation Manual, l lt` Edit, None : NIA Pass -by trips: per TIS Guidelines Internal trips: NIA Transit use: N/A Qtlzer: NIA izon Non -site traffic estunates: Collier C Site -trip generation: ITE ll�' Edition LUC Supermarket. LUC I � 1 —Mini-Warehouse. F SF ofretail and $tJ=AAA SF of s Trip distribution method: District 1 Re Traffic assignment method: project trit Traffic growth rate: historical — Slnoppin� Plaza �� — lSfll� without inaton _analyzed that Tonal Flaruuna Model - refer to Fi rate or 2°'o minimum fewer trigs i 2. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 18 Immokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict— GMPA &PUD2Applicotion — Traffic Impact Statement —July 2023 Turning movements: Site Access: ; the site development elan aDnlicati Figw•e 2 —Project Trig Distribution u, a y io y� C C E¢ � Q v ro EVERGLADE L `o EVERGLADES 4.9 0 N Tt (O m d F- Ui 10.3 4.9 4.1 2 9 EvERGLP.DES g F" EVERGLADES EVERGLADES EV[RGlACES u J z un r� Gp u m Q c r_ p Ion K J W d u 16TH 16TH 0 0 0 co� �, �I.1 16TH I ,6 rfy 16TH C O Lei Zj p c N 4 > � J 0 co O0 0 0 �1 r�AiOWWIIM14MLEE �T)VM 27.4 t 44.200 ra, a �? e � s �r- r WILSON BL 0 0 t 6,9 2,a 9.7 6A W115% BL '�, wiLSON BL A LL1 r � N O� v� S sb c 2 Page 4 of 6 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 19 Irnmokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict— GMPA &vuuz Application — Traffic Impact Statement —July 2023 Special Fea�,(from preliminary study or prior experience} Accident locations: N/A Sight distance: N/A ueuing: N/A Access location & configuration: N/A Traffic control: MUTCD Siginal system location & progression needs: NIA On -site parking needs: N/A Data Sources: CC 2 Base maps: N!A Prior study reports: N/A Access policy and jurisdiction: N/A Review process: N/A Requiremelnts: N/A Miscellaneous: N/A Shall Scale Study — No Fee Minor Study - S750.00 Major Study - $1,500.04 Methodology Fee $500.00 Includes (i intersections Additional Intersections - $54a.OQ each c All fees will be agreed to wring the gleihodology meeting and must be pant to Transportation prior to our sign -off on the application. SI�NATUF�ES Study Preparer—Dorman Trebilcocl� Revie�ver�s) Applicant Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 20 Immokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict— GMPA &PUDZApplication — Traffic lmpact Statement —July 2023 Collier County Traffic Impact Study Review Fee Schedule Fees will be paid incrementally as the development proceeds: Methodology Review, Analysis Review, and Sufficiency Reviews. Fees for additional meetings or other optional services are also provided below. t� e lti%thodology Review includes review of a submitted methodology statement, including review of submitted trip generation estimate(s), distribution, assignment, and review of a "Small Scale Study" determination, written approval/comments on a proposed methodology statement, and written confirmation of a re -submitted, amended methodology statement, and one meeting in Collier County, if needed. ;`Small Scale Study" Review - No Additional Fee (Includes one sufficiency review) Upon approval of the methodology review, the applicant may submit the study. The review includes: a coneurrency determination, site access inspection and confirmation of the study compliance with trip generation, distribution and maximum threshold compliance. "Minor StudyReview" - $75Q Fee {Includes one sufficiency review) Review{ of the submitted traffic analysis includes: optional field visit to site, confirmation of trip generation, distribution, and assignment, concurrency determination, confirmation of coininitted improvements, review of traffic volume data collected/assembled, review of of site improvements within the righof-way, revi tew of site access and circulation, and preparation and review of "sufficiency" comments/questions. "Maier Study Review" - 51,5Ufl Fee (Includes two intersection analysis and two sufficiency Reviex,xr of the submitted tl-affic analysis includes: field visit to site, confirmation of trip generation, special trip generation and/or trip length study, distribution and assignment, concurrency determination, confirmation of committed improvements, review of traffic volume data collected/assembled, review of traffic growth analysis, review of off site roadway operations and capacity analysis, review of site access and circulation, neighborhood traffic intrusion issues, any necessary improvement proposals and associated cost estimates, and preparation and review of up to two rounds of "sufficiency" comments/questions and/or recommended conditions of approval. cr ti dditinn a1 inttarenrtinn `Rawinw" _ The review of additional intersections shall include file same parameters as outlined in the `��iajor Study Revisal" and shall apply to each intersection above the first two intersections included in the "major Study Review" "Additional Su Additional sufficiency reviews beyond those initially included in the appropriate study shall require the additional Fee prior to the completion of the review. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 21 Immokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict— GMPA &PUDZApplication — Traffic impact Statement —July 2023 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 22 Shopping Plaza 40K-150K - 821 N 1000 SF 45.000 1 1 1 Total 37038 115 119 234 48 30 78 Supermarket No External I 1 115 1 119 1 234 I 48 i 30 I 78 Net New 1 1 I 86 i 89 1175 1 I 36 I 22 i 58 (Mini -Warehouse I 151 ( 1000 SF 180.000 1 1 1 1 1 1 (Total 1 116 1 1 6 1 6 1 12 I 1 4 1 3 1 7 40 � 25 � 65 Trip Generation Rates from ITE Trip Generation Manual 11th Ed. Pass -by Capture volume based on lesser of: A) Rate per ITE Trip Generation Handbook 3rd Ed.; or B) County maximum allowable rate Daily Internal Capture and Pass -by Capture is sum of AM and PM Peak Period results Immokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict— GMPA &PUD2Application — Traffic Impact Statement —July 2023 iAD Description A mini -warehouse is a building in which a number of storage units or vaults are rented for the storage of goods. They are typically referred to as "self -storage" facilities, Each unit is physically separated from other units, and access is usually provided through an overhead door or other common access point. The technical appendices provide supporting information on time -of -day distributions for this land use. The appendices can be accessed through either the I I I ripGen web app or the trip generation resource page on the ITE website (https://www.ite.or ltechnica!,resources/topics/trip: ..... .......... and.parkinc .cenerationl,�. The sites were surveyed in the 1980s, the 1990s, the 2000s, and the 2010s in California, Colorado, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, Texas, and Utah. 212, 403) 551, 568, 642, 708, 724, 850, 868, 876, 1024, 1035 �. r r. r ' r 11 1 • • � Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 24 Imrr OKOIee Randall Commercial Subdistrict— GMPA &PUDZApplication — Traffic Impact Statement —July 2023 I11 I Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA On a: Weeitday Setting/Location: General Urban�Suburban Number of Studies: 16 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA: 55 Directional Distribution: 50°lo entering, 50°� exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 4 200 �n j 1.45 0.38 - 3.25 X X X ' ; ; / X � / x ; / X ♦ ; ♦ ; ! x x ' / I ,x X XX ' x ' ; 200 X Study Site Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 110 Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition • Valume 3 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 25 lmmokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict— GMPA &PUDZApplication — Traffic Impact Statement —July 2023 I, Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1Q00 Sq. Ft. GFA On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. SettingiLocaton: General UrbanlSuburban Number of Studies: 13 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. (..FA* 70 Directional Distribution: 59% entering, 41% exiting O.04 - 0.17 , , 1 1 i / , 1 1 1 00 X r r� r ; 1 X it A 00 X X X 1 1 X � 40 X X 1 X Study Site Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA V.OS Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 26 Immokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict— GMPA &PUDZ,4pplication — Traffic Impact Statement —July 2023 r Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 10fl8 �q. Ft. GFA •Hour Between j and . Setting/Location: General UrbanlSuburban Number of Studies: 18 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA: 59 Directional Distribution: 47°I° entering, 53°!o exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 1 112 0015 C[il m 20 10 Standard Deviation 0.02 - 0.64 f f f f !'1 f f X xf � f / I �r 00 • ; I � !� f X,r r ' X Xago ; �iCSC X X r / ' X v X X Study Site Fitted Curve Equa#ion: N©t Given 100 X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA Trip generation Manual 11th Edition •Volume 3 - - - - -Average Rate Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 27 Immokolee Randall Commercial Subdistrict— GMPA &PUDZApplication — Traffic Impact Statement —July 2023 i * ••• • • . integrated group • • establishments • r• developed, wned, and managed as a unit. Each study site in this land use has between 40)000 and 150,000 - • r r feet gross leasable rr. rr• area t r term • • in r . • r « rather r "center" is simply a means of distinction between the different shopping center size ranges. Various other names are commonly used to categorize a shopping plaza within this size range, depending on its specific size and tenants, such as neighborhood center, community center, and fashion center. Its major tenant is often a supermarket but many sites are anchored by home improvement, discount, or other stores. A shopping plaza typically contains more than retail merchandising facilities. Office space, a movie theater, restaurants, a post office, banks, a health club, and recreational facilities are common tenants. A shopping plaza is almost always open-air and the GLA is the same as the gross floor area of the building. The 150,000 square feet GLA threshold value between shopping plaza and shopping center (Land Use )IQ based on an examination of trip generation data. For a shopping plaza that is smaller than the threshold value, the presence or absence of a supermarket within the plaza has a measurable effect on site trip generation. For a shopping center that is larger than the threshold value, the trips generated by its other major tenants mask any effects of the presence or absence of an on -site supermarket. The 40,000 square feet GFA threshold between shopping plaza and strip retail plaza (Land Use 822) was selected based on an examination of the overall shopping center/plaza database. No shopping plaza with a supermarket as its anchor is smaller than 40,000 square feet GLA. Shopping center (>150k) (Land Use 820), strip retail plaza (<40k) (Land Use 822), and factory outlet center (Land Use 823) are related uses.. Land Uae Subcategory The presence or absence of a supermarket in a shopping plaza has been determined to have a measurable effect on site trip generation. Therefore, data are presented for two subcategories for this land use: sites with a supermarket anchor and sites without a supermarket. Additiona! Data The technical appendices provide supporting information on time -of -day distributions for this land use. The appendices can be accessed through either the ITETripGen web app or the trip generation resource page on the ITE website (https:l/www.ite.org/technical-resources/topics/trip: and :parking-generation/). ..... ............. ..................... ....... ........ . ................ General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 8fl0-999} '197 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 28 Immokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict- GMPA &PUDZApplication - Traffic Impact Statement -July 2023 The sites were surveyed in the 1980s, the 1990s, the 2000s, and the 2010s in Alberta (CAN), British Columbia (CAN), California, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, Ontario (CAN), Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, and Wisconsin. 105, 110, 156, 159, 186, 19$, 204, 211, 213, 239, 259, 260, 295, 3Q1, 304, 305, 307, 317, 319, 358, 376, 390, 400, 4041 4371 444, 446, 5071 580, 598, 658, 728, 908, 926, 944, 946, 9601 973, 974, 1004, 1009, 1025, 1069 198 Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition Volume 5 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Immokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict— GMPA &PUDZApplication — Traffic Impact Statement —July 2023 • Vehicle Trip Ends vsm. rrr Settingl�ocation: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 7 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA: 59 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting Vehicle Trip Generafiion per 1 nnn Sq. Ft. Goa 212 5000 // 1 67.52 43.29 - 91.06 1925 r X X 1 1 1 ; ; x1 1 1 X i r r X i i r { ; ; i / 1 1 1 i ; , , 1 1 ; 1 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 1 1 1 , , 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 0 0 20 X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA X Study Site Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition •Volume 5 - - - - -Average Rate Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 30 Immokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict— GMPA &P(JDZApplication — Traffic Impact Statement —July 2023 Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA t)n a: Weekday, •Hour Between 7 and9 Settingl�ocatian: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 13 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA: 67 Directional Distribution: 62% entering, 38% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1 nnn Sq. Ft. GLA 1.73 200 0.29 - 3.77 X ; OF v ; J r, J: J . ; x OF X X00 r topJ� x A ; ; X X 1.06 0 0 100 200 X = 1000 5q. Ft. GLA X Study Site Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given W_ Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 31 Immokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict— GMPA &PUUZApplication — Traffic Impact Statement —July 2U23 i 1 ! i got' • • • r r III r + On a: Weekday, • Hour Between 4 and SettinglLoca#ion: General UrbanlSuburban Number of Studies: 42 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA: 79 Directional Distribution: 49%entering, 51 °� exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA UUM 214 1000 4D0 200 2. 55 - 15.31 Standard Deviation 2.28 X ; i X ' I X; Ot r r ' r r X X` r .► X X ---- ------...----..... -- -- ,r=0 -- -3- -------- -- - -- ---- X XX Xx �. r XX X XX X . x OX ,X Xx x X Study Site Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition • Valume 5 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 32 Immokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict— GMPA &PUD2Application — Traffic lmpact Statement —July 2023 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 33 Immokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict— GMPA &PUDZApplication — Traffic Impact Statement —July 2023 T ALE 7 G enera li zed �qv�dak i-i%Jur �i re%0 1 anal ' �a lum es far FI on da's Urbanized Areas STATE SI�NALIZEI� ARTERIALS FRE E�TA�S ClassI (40 rnp1-i or higl'ier posted speed limit) i Core Urbanized Lanes Median B C D E Lames B C D E 1 Undivided * 830 880 ** 2 27230 37100 321740 4,080 2 Divided * 12910 221000 ** 3 37280 47570 57620 67130 3 Divided * 2,940 3,020 ** 4 471310 6,030 721490 82170 4 Divided * 37970 4,040 ** 5 5390 7,430 92370 107220 Class II (35 mph or slower posted speed limit) 6 67390 82990 117510 127760 L ane s M e di an B C D E Urb anima 1 Undivided * 370 750 800 Lanes B C D E 2 Divided * 730 12630 1,700 2 2,270 3,100 351890 4,230 3 Divided * 17170 27520 27560 3 37410 42,650 52780 6,340 4 Divided * 1,610 3,390 3,420 4 4,550 6,200 7,680 81460 5 57690 7,760 97520 10,570 Non.StateSignalized Roadway Adjustments Freeway Adjustments (Albejrconesporxdi.nZ stale vchnaes Auxiliary Ramp bythe indicated percent.) Lane IVbtering Ikon-8 tate Signalized Roa,di3vays -100/0 + 1,000 +5% Median &Turn Lane Adjustments UNINTERRUPTED FLOW HIGHWAYS Ex lusrre ExcluSir,e Adjustment Lang s IVkdiarL Le fl Lanes Right Lanes Factors Lanes I II e di an B C D E 1 Divded Yes No +5% 1 Undivided 580 890 1,200 17610 1 Undwiced too No -2UyFO 2 Divided 17800 27600 31280 37730 IVUti Undivided Yes NO -5% 3 Divided 2,700 37900 4,920 5,600 VUti Undivided No NO -25% 0 — — Yes + 0 Uninterrupted Flow Highway Adjustments Lanes Median Exclusprre lefl lanes Adjustment factors One -Way Facility Adjustment 1 Divided Yes +5Vo Multiply the cozresponding directional Multi Undivided Yes -5°110 vohnnes in this tab le b y 1.2 Multi Undivided No -25% BICYCLE M4T}E2 'V. je,5 d•Lrlymilire pxts��ted�tleab:rv�addaectsnal�rol�e: for IneL41f sexrice end (tl,�hiltiply vplaclp vahlrres shavmb elr�r by rnlrt� er of are fortle Z��,7u,.obiLy.tnlc�: madrs irl.}e a spy cYil:alt;T stand. Tlti.: tib)e doer riot dirncticrilal rc�d�xaylees to deitelnTine two-vraym�xirrnunsexvi,oe crsetb� astu&zduLdciculdbeused o k-rfar gay�mlpl�itu:dr1� a�licaiis�:.The cl mTrit�r mo&Lc from 17t l6 :htl'li tlblf is c=ed duouldbe usy dfar more 5pecfir vohunes.) phndigWh.wkiLs.Ile table;uiddutmgcemFn=mode l; _:hlmhn cltbe ixvdfor P ave d conrilkI Ir iLrgy matt &.cL'� T,Ahere more reIRU2dIT! C) tlll7les exit. C a1:lila6ze are barednriplu-irdr .awfitaiions cf the H�.IY[ crudty. Tranid ftw k)y and Q 1r)TQ S aoulderfBicycle Service IAUALM1. Lane C overage B C D E Il'm1ofeuviceforthebiTgcle uLdpedearianmo&5 inthlstable kbwda:L 0 - 49 °fo * 150 390 17 00 0 unmber of irdLles,notnmber of tac'vc ltw: clrprdestri3ns 1xitit1•e fuffity. 50-84% 110 340 1000 >1000 ' ' btixes:perkns�hnnUe QrkTfar$4Lepe6.*h)11iatle :14e diWk0.C6XLof theLr07irtraffr 85-100% 470 1,000 >1,000 ** flanr. PE DE STRIAN M ODE' � • camcrtbe arhievedussrgtablhputvdu e dEfauu}s. (Multiply vehicle vahitne; shwarnbelvw b y nirrib er of ++ Not applicable far tYe21aae1 of service ]ettas grs,dp. Fcstle s1mo6aI mods, dirEctiamal io�way fares � detf�trix�e i?ara-way ma�an�um service noimle: �yatrrtl•►u� )reel of ser?i:e rl beC�ime F berauip Y�~r� cti,�21 ca�a:ciif's lave vahlxttes.) be�sLrealded. Fort1v biqlchmode, A•uy hvelIttergrlilde (hyblditt.F)ISncl 1 afl•tievible becaixe t1vn is rLo mv:mima v4dcls vohm e tltpsl�oli�l_�� .table itput Sidewalk Coverage B C D E Maws. 0-49% * * 140 480 50-84% 80 440 800 Florik D ep mim at of Tra at&bn 85-100% 200 540 990 > 17000 lAn'�� �plym '0r` Gffiem11 x arflilt f7rrFdumir sN-ip BU S Ike OD E (Sehed uled Fixed Ro ute? (Buses in peak li= in peal; directi* i Sidewalk Coverage B C D E ! 0-84% > 5 4 3 2 85-100% >4 >3 >2 >1 I IILL ILL VI L'Lltl I'+i l- 11fY7v L•v NJll Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 34 In'lmokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict- GMPA &PUDZ Application - Traffic Impact Statement -July 2023 (continued) G enerali zed P Hour �I rOCt10�11 1{olurrI es far FI on da'S � rbani zed Areas Janua n� Z�Z� IUT VALUE INPUT ASSUMPTIONS Uninterrupted Flow Facilities Irate ted Fbw Facilities State Artpmiz r= Class I Freeways con Fn evmfs HighrraTs Class I Clams II Bi,cyTls Peieshiam ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Area t; (urban, viral) urban urban Number of through lanes (both dir) 440 4-12 2 4-8 2 4-8 4 4 Posted speed (mph) 70 65 50 50 30 30 45 45 Free flow spe ed (mph) 75 70 55 55 35 35 50 50 Auxil' Lanes (r n n Idn Median (d, t4;rlt, n, n r) r n r r r Terrain (l,r) 1 1 1 1 1 % no s gr zone 80 Exclusive left turn lane impact (n, y) In] Ex clusri Ve right turn lanes (n, y) n rL n n n n Facility le rg th (mi) 3 3 5 5 2 2 1.9 1.8 2 2 TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS Planning analysis hour factor (lt') 0.090 0.085 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 Directional distribution factor(D) 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.550 0.560 0.565 0.560 0.565 0.565 Peak hour factor(PHF 0.95 0.95 a.95 a.95 1.000 1.aa0 1,000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Base saturation flour rate (pcphpl) 27400 2,400 17700 2,2aa 1,95a 17950 17950 17950 17950 17950 Hea.ryvel&le percent 4.0 4.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.5 2.0 S reed Adjustment Factor (S AF) 0.975 0.975 0.975 Capacity Adjustment Fa,ctor(CAF) 0.968 0.968 0.968 • left turns 12 12 12 12 12 12 • right turns 12 12 12 12 12 12 CONTROL CHARACTERISTICS Dumber of signals 4 4 10 10 4 6 Arrival type (1-6) 3 3 4 4 4 4 S ignaI type (a, c, p) c c c c c c Cycle length (C) 120 150 120 120 120 120 Effe ctive ree n ratio (gfQ 0.44 0.45 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 11rFULTIMODAL CHARACTERISTICS Pasted shoulderlbicyule lane (r y) n, 50a/4, Y n Outside lane width (r t, w) t t Fa��rernent condition (d, t, u) t On -street parking (n, y) S ide walk (r n, 50¢�4, Side uralkhoadway separation(a, t, ur) t Side walk protective barrier (n, y) lit I I I I n LEVEL OF SERVICE TITRE SHOLD S Level of Sez ice Freeways Hijar tways Arterials Bicycle Ped Bus De rLAty Two -La Multilane Class I Class II Sc ore Score Busesilnr. °gaff's Density ats ats B <17 >83.3 <17 >31mph >22mph <2.75 <2.75 <6 C < 24 > 75.0 < 24 > 23 mph > 17 mph 3.50 < 3.50 4 D <31 >66.7 <31 18mph >13mph <4.25 <4.25 <3 E <39 >58.3 <35 > 15mph >10mph <5.00 <5.00 <2 � ft = Peroent free flow speed ate _ Average travel speed Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 35 lmmokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict— GMPA &PUDZApplication — Traffic Impact Statement —July 2023 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 36 M7 (D C' n O C� O Ln C r+ rQ (./0) O_ O e Conversion Rates for Traffic Impact assessments to W � Thy. � data i � � compil ati on of "l��l �� of Thu�r�b" an � calculations using th � ITE �'�� � aeration ( nuat. 'hiese conversi on rates should only be considered when local data} JUD U I I i strict aui 'dance or more eci c In of edge i not available. Ilr)mokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict— GMPA &PUDZApplication — Traffic Impact Statement —July 2023 D 1RPM Facilities in Vicinity Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 38 Imn'lokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict— GMPA &PUDZApplication — Traffic Impact Statement —July 2U3 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 39 -q- — - a I I I I I I I 10= ARISSIRIMAMAUUHL Prepared for: Hole Montes 950 Encore Way Naples, FL 34110 Phone: 239-254-2000 Collier County, Florida 4/25/2023 Prepared by: Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 2800 Davis Boulevard, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239-566-9551 Email: ntrebilcock@trebilcock.biz Immokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict —Fair-Share Mitigation for Concurrency Impacts —April 2023 The proposed Immokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict is in eastern Collier County. It is located on the south side of Immokalee Rd., west of its intersection with Randall Blvd. The development application seeks to allow up to 125,000 square feet (SF) of commercial space. The Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) analyzed 100,000 SF of mixed retail for concurrency and trip cap purposes. That intensity and use is projected to generate 389 PM Peak Hour two-way trips. The TIS demonstrated that another scenario involving 45,000 SF of mixed retail and 80,000 SF of self -storage would generate far fewer trips (187). That latter scenario did not create a significant impact on the road segment discussed in this report. The developer is responsible to pay appropriate fees required by the County's Road Impact Fee Ordinance, as building permits are issued for the proposed project. Roadway impact fees for the subject project are estimated at $1.38 million (Table 2) for 100,000 SF mixed retail at buildout (projected in 2028). The rates are based on the Collier County Residential Impact Fee Schedule dated April 1, 2023. For more details refer to Appendix A. Proposed internal roads, driveways, internal alleys, internal sidewalks/pathways, and interconnections to adjacent developments are site related improvements and are not subject to impact fee credits. In addition, the developer is required to provide appropriate turn lanes at project entrances as required at the time of site development approval. These improvements are considered site related. If turn lane improvements require the use of County's Right -of -Way (ROW) or easements, compensating ROW along the development frontage may need to be provided without cost to Collier County because of such improvement. Concurrency is a growth management concept intended to ensure that the necessary public facilities and services are available concurrent with the impacts of development. To maintain concurrency, forecasted future trafficvolumes may not exceed adopted level of service on the roadway network (area of significant influence of the project). A roadway segment is considered adversely impacted by the project if its future background traffic volume meets the adopted level of service (LOS) standard and the segment becomes deficient with the addition of project traffic. The methodology used to calculate the applicant's proportionate fair share obligation towards concurrency requirements is described in a later section. In general, it estimates the project's consumption of any capacity that must be added due to a level of service failure created by the addition of project traffic. On road segments that are already six lanes, any further improvements will be in the form of intersection improvements. Current methodology is to provide an estimate of the proportionate fair share assuming traditional widening of the road (regardless of configuration) and then revise that by replacing widening costs by intersection improvement costs on six lane segments. The TIS identified the road segments on which the addition of project traffic is projected to cause a future level of service deficiency (distinct from segments that are projected to experience failing level of service before the project traffic is added). The methodology used to calculate the applicant's proportionate fair share obligation towards concurrency requirements is outlined in Florida Statutes (F.S.) Section 163.3180 (Concurrency) and FDOT Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 2 Immokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict— Fair -Share Mitigation for Concurrency Impacts —April 2023 (Florida Department of Transportation) — CUTR (Center for Urban Transportation Research) Model Ordinance for Proportionate Fair Share Mitigation of Development Impacts on Transportation Corridors. The proposed methodology is also consistent with the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC), Section 6.02.03. As illustrated in F.S. Section 163.3180 — (5)(h)2a, "the proportionate -share contribution shall be calculated based upon the number of trips from the proposed development expected to reach roadways during the peak hour from the stage or phase being approved, divided by the change in the peak hour maximum service volume of roadways resulting from construction of an improvement necessary to maintain or achieve the adopted level of service, multiplied by the construction cost, at the time of development payment, of the improvement necessary to maintain or achieve the adopted level of service". Proportionate Fair -Share = � [(Development Trips/Service Volume Increase) x Cost] Development Trips =those trips from the stage or phase of development under review that are assigned to a roadway segment and have triggered a deficiency. This does not include the development trips on the segment that consumed available capacity. Service Volume Increase =service volume increase provided by the eligible improvement to roadway segment. Cost =adjusted cost of the improvement to roadway segment. Cost shall include all improvements and associated costs, such as design, right-of-way acquisition, planning, engineering, inspection, and physical development costs directly associated with construction at the anticipated cost in the year it will be incurred. The roadway level of service analysis of the Immokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict described in TIS assumed the presence of all capacity improvements scheduled to the end Collier County 5-Year Work Program. In Table 1, the first capacity listed is that future capacity and is described as "Unimproved" only to distinguish it from the proposed capacity improvement. Roadway service volumes in any future improved condition use the Collier County AUIR service volume multiplied by the ratio of LOS D service volumes shown in FDOT Generalized Service Volume Table 7 (Urban Condition, Class I Arterial, Appendix B) between the improved and unimproved cross sections (product rounded to the nearest hundred). That ratio reflects the effect of the additional lanes while keeping all other factors affecting service volume constant. Those other factors are reflected in the County's published service volume in the unimproved condition. The projected cost per lane mile is $4.27 million: $3.5 million construction cost from the Collier County Road Impact Fee Update Study dated October 2019, 11% of construction cost for design, and 11% of construction cost for CEL Table 1 contains the proportionate fair share contribution estimated for the one roadway segment on which the addition of project traffic triggers a level of service deficiency in the year 2028: Randall Blvd. from 8t" St NE to Everglades Blvd. The calculations that the table contains are performed with more decimal places than those displayed. Using only the displayed decimals will yield slightly different results. The contribution requirement for concurrency transportation related impacts total $0.332M. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 3 (D C' n O n 7C" n O Ln r+ 0�4 Cn O_ C rw+ O �cn lug Cj lmmokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict —Fair-Share Mitigation for con currency Impacts — April 2023 Table 2 contains the transportation impact fee estimate for 100,000 SF mixed retail. The impact fee schedule is in Appendix A. Table 2 —Impact Fee Estimate Fee per Unit Fees Ill TOTAL 0/ SOURCE: CC COMM IMPACT FEES --EFFECTIVE April 1, 2023; CC RESIDENTIAL IMPACT FEES --EFFECTIVE April 1, 2023. To mitigate the $0.332M impact, the proposed mitigation is impact fees of $1.377M. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 5 Immokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict —Fair-Share Mitigation for con currency Impacts —April 2023 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page ( 6 COLLIER COUNTY COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEES EFFECTIVE APRIL 15 2023 Greater Naples Fire Changes LAND USE Auto Sales (Luxury) LQ EMS 0008084 GOVERNAIENT BUILDINGS 0953622 JAIL 0.29407 LA'W ENFOR+CEA1JCI:NT 0.32161 ROAD 12.38000 TOTAL (RC)U,I�iDED) "WATER, WASTEWATER AND FIRE NOT INCLUDED (See Page 3) 13.60 Per Square Foot Auto Sales (New/Used) 0011538 0.76528 0.40542 0.45899 16.62200 18.37 Per Square Foot Bank/Savings Drive -In** 0017896 1018697 0.6Z882 0071191 21025400 23,96 Per Square Foot Bank/Savings. WalkJn** 0017503 1.16094 0.61504 0.69630 12.30000 14.95 Per Square Foot Business Park 0007535 0049978 0026477 0.Z9975 11.30100 12.44 Per Square Foot Car Wash - Automated 0.13814 0.91626 0.48540 0.54954 38.30300 40.39 Per Square Foot Car Wash - Self•Service 68.29 452.92 239.94 271.65 11,848.00 12,880.80 Per Bay Church 2.35 15.62 8.27 9.37 286.00 321.61 Per Seat College - 7,500 students or less 7.85 52.06 27.58 31.22 11973.00 2,091.71 Per Student College - > 7,500 student 5.49 36.44 19.31 21.86 1,483.00 L566.10 Per Student Convenience Store (24 hours) 0.42934 2084768 1050862 1070795 82.17000 88.66 Per Square Foot Convenience Store w/Gas: 4 or less Fuel Positions 341.43 21,264061 110199072 110358.24 based on sq ft range *5,164.00 Per Fuel Position 5-6 Fuel Positions 290.41 1,926.2Z 110020.46 1,155.Z9 based on sq ft range *4,392.38 Per Fuel Position 7-8 Fuel Positions 258.23 L712.77 907.37 1,027.27 based on sq ft range *3,905.64 Per Fuel Position 9=10 Fuel Positions 230.76 1,530.56 810.85 917.99 based on sq ft range *3,490.16 Per Fuel Position 11.12 Fuel Positions 215.85 1,431.65 758.45 858.66 based on sq ft range *3,264.61 Per Fuel Position 13 or more Fuel Positions Z03.29 1,348.35 714.32 808.70 based on sq ft range *3,074.66 Per Fuel Position 2,000 sq. $o based on # of fuel pos based on # of fuel pos based on # of fuel pos based on # of fuel pos 6,910.00 *6,910.00 Per Fuel Position 2,000 •2,999 sq. ft based on # of fuel pos based on # of fuel pos based on # of fuel pos based on # of fuel pos 8,252.00 *8,252.00 Per Fuel Position 3,000+ sq ftbased on # of fuel pos based on # of fuel pos based on # of fuel pos based on # of fuel pos 9,262.00 *9,262.00 Per Fuel Position Dance Studio/Clymnastics 0.174Z5 1015573 0061228 0069317 9.32500 11.96 Per Square Foot Day Care 3.9Z 26.03 13.79 15.61 1,097.00 1,156.35 Per Student Furniture Store 0.01884 0.12494 0.06620 0.07494 3067400 3.96 Per Square Foot Golf Course 84.77 562.25 297.86 337.22 11,063.67 12,345.77 Per Hole Golf Course - Bundled 25.42 168.62 89.33 101.13 3,318.94 3,703.44 Per Hole Home Improvement Store 0.14207 0094229 0.49919 0656515 8.51400 10.66 Per Square Foot Hospital 0010753 0671322 0.37784 0.42777 9016800 10.79 Per Square Foot Hotel 63.58 421.69 220.63 Z52.91 3,702.00 4,660.81 Per Room Hotel - All Suites 63.58 421.69 220.63 252.91 21974400 3,932.81 Per Room Industrial - General Light 0.05416 0.35921 0.19030 0.21545 4.58400 5.40 Per Square Foot Manufacturing 0003925 0.26030 0.13790 0015612 3062900 4.22 Per Square Foot Marina 14.91 98.91 52.41 59.33 2,376.00 2,601.56 Per Dry/Wet Berth Mine/ Commercial Excavation - - - - 14.00 14.00 Per 1,000 Cubic Yards Mini -Warehouse 0.00471 0.03124 0.01655 0601873 0689100 0.96 Per Square Foot Motel 59.65 395.66 209.60 237.30 2,074000 2,976.21 Per Room Movie Theater** 46937 3,113.19 1,649.27 1,867.Z0 4030887.00 47,986.03 1Per Screen COLLIER COUNTY COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEES EFFECTIVE APRIL 15 2023 Greater Naples Fire Changes reel" ME LAND USE Nursing Home EAS 82.41 GOVERN. .,NT BUILDINGS 546.63 JAIL 248.22 LAW ENFORCEA ENT 3Z7.85 ROAD 1,276.00 TOTAL (R{i�ll'NDE�) WATER, 'WASTEWAT.ER AND FTIZE NOT INCLUDED (See .Page 3) 2,481.11 Per Bed Office 6,000 sq. ft or less 0.07849 0652060 0027580 0031224 8.60500 9.79 Per Square Foot Office 6,001400,000 sq. ft. 0009340 0.61951 0032820 0.37157 8060500 10.02 Per Square Foot Office 100,001-200,000 sq. ft. 0.07927 0.52581 0.27856 0.31536 8.60500 9.80 Per Square Foot Office 200,001400,000 sq. ft. 0.06672 0.44251 0.23443 0.26540 8.60500 9.61 Per Square Foot MEN Office Greater than 400,000 sq. ft. 0.06044 0640086 0.21236 0.24042 8060500 9.52 Per Square Foot Office - Medical 10,000 sf, or less 0.08948 0.59348 0.31441 0.35595 Z1.95500 23.31 Per Square Foot Office - Medical >10,000 sq. ft. 0.13029 0.86420 0.45783 0.51832 31.44400 33.41 Per Square Foot Pharmacy/Drug Store 0.15384 1.02038 0.54056 0.61199 12.61800 14.94 Per Square Foot Quick Lube 91.05 603.90 319.93 362.20 12,198.00 13,575.08 Per Bay Restaurant -Fast Food w/Drive- 'I hru 0.69856 4.63334 2.45460 2.77894 104.27200 114.84 Per Square Foot Restaurant - High Turnover** 21.19 140.56 74.46 84.30 1,814.00 2,134.51 Per Seat Restaurant - Low Trn uover** 17.27 114.53 60.68 68.69 1,163.00 1,424.17 Per Seat Restaurant - Fast Casual** 0069856 4063334 2045460 2677894 68610700 78.67 Per Square Foot - Restaurant Fast Food wlDrive- Thru (2 meals) 0069856 4063334 2.45460 2077894 95076200 106.33 Per Square Foot Retail 6,000 Sq. Ft. or Less 0019230 1027547 0.67571 0076499 5.73700 8.65 Per Square Foot MEN Retail 6,001-25,000 Sq. Ft. 0.19230 1.27547 0.67571 0.76499 10.56800 13.48 Per Square Foot Retail 25,001- Ft 50,000 Sq. . 0.19Z30 1027547 0067571 0.76499 13677400 16.68 Per Square Foot Ft Retail 50,001400,000 Sq. . 0.19Z30 1027547 0067846 0076499 13.77400 16.69 Per Square Foot Retail 100,001450,000 Sq. Ft. 0019230 1.27547 0.62055 0076499 13077400 16.63 Per Square Foot Retail 150,Ft 001-200,000 Sq. . 0.18759 1.24423 0.75845 0.74625 13.77400 16.71 Per Square Foot Retail 200,001-400,000 Sq. Ft. 0.18367 1.21820 0064536 0.73064 13.77400 16.55 Per Square Foot PER Retail 400,001-600,000 Sq. Ft. 0618210 L20779 0967295 0.72440 13.77400 16,56 Per Square Foot Retail 600,001-1,000,000 Sq. Ft. 0.17032 1.12970 0.66743 0067756 13077400 16.42 Per Square Foot Retail >1,000,000 Sq. Re 0.16404 L08805 0.57642 0.65258 13.77400 16.26 Per Square Foot School asElementary (Private) 4.71 31.24 16.55 18.73 815.00 886.23 Per Student School asMiddle (Private) 5.49 36.44 19.31 21.86 921.00 1,004.10 Per Student School asHigh School (Private) NOW MMOM 6.28 41.65 22.07 24.98 983.00 1,077.98 Per Student Supermarket** 0016090 1.06723 0056539 0064009 Z2.56900 25.00 Per Square Foot Tire Store 105.18 697.60 369.57 418.40 9,318.00 10,908.75 Per Bay Warehouse 0002198 0.14577 0.07722 0.08743 1059900 1.93 Per Square Foot * Fees for Convenience Store w/Gas are determined by different criteria. Remember to include ALL fees when calculating **If in a shopping center, or if on an outparcei of a shopping center, use Retail land use. CIT Y OFNAPLES AND CITY OF MARCO ISLAND: Collier County Law Enforcement, Fire, Water and Sewer are not assessed. Check with the City for their impact fees. CITY OF EVERGLADES: Collier County Road, Water and Sewer are not assessed. Immokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict — Fair -Share Mitigation for Con currency Impacts —April 2023 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 9 Immokolee Randall Commercial Subdistrict — Fair -Share Mitigation for Concurrency Impacts — April 2023 T� D L E I G r er4liZe� reidK MOW Li lluncAl Volumes for Flerida'ad s Urt�ari]�Ed A►r�3 January 2020 MIN 111 all STATE SIGNALIZED ARTERLALS I K I E�iTAX Cola s s I (40 avh £�f higher poste speed limit) Core Urbanized Laces byledian B C D E, Lanes B C D E 1 Undivided � 830 880 �* 2 2,230 3,100 3,740 421080 2 Divided * 1v910 2,000 3 1280 4570 5,620 6,130 3 Divided * 2,,940 3,020 ** 4 4.310 61,030 7,490 52170 4 Divided * 3,970 47040 * 5 5,390 7430 9,3 70 10:1 ? Class II (35 mph or slower posted speed limit) 6 6,380 801990 1110510 12,760 Lanes Median B C D E Urbani ed 1 Undhrrided * 370 750 Soo Lanes B C D E 1, ? Dig►idled * 730 1,630 C+0 ? 2,2' 0 1100 3,890 �4,23Q 3 Divided * 113170 22520 24 60 3 3,410 4,650 5,�780 6,340 4 Divided * 12610 32390 3410 4 4,550 6,200 711654 82460 5 5,690 7,760 9,520 10,570 Non -State Signalized Roadmmy Adjustments Freeway Adjustments (Aher corresperudiag :star luvlumes Ain€ ha r r RIEW b)'the imdicati*l peat) Lane 2.ielbenng NonStat+e Signalized Roadw �s -10% + LOOO + 5 0?* �I�ied>ian & Turn Lane Adjustments til�iINTERRITPTED FLG�' HIGHWAY Exoruve Exclusive Adju Lanes Idedian Leif Lanes Right Lanes Facto Lanes 1lriedian B C D E 1 Diidde Yes No +50la 1 Undi%Tided 580 890 12200 17610 1 Undivided No No M76 2 Di%rided 1:1800 1600 3,280 3,730+ hihiltl Undixided fires No -5!e 3 Divided 2t700 3,900 429410 52600 Multi Undi7Ade. No No -25% Yes +5% Uninterrupted Floes* Highway Adjustments Laney t�'iei� F��c%te left lanes ,�.�ljust�nt Ian One -Ws ay Faeilit - Adjustment 1 Dixided Yes +5% Multiply the co2i -T& cn = tioual Mbld, Undiirided Yes Y vohones in this table by 12 Multi Undkided No -2'Y/e BICYCIE 110DEi Tahiesi Shawn are Wre. d as peak hour d P�=r al xvkmes for la"Js of sen ice mi (MnildpRy .eM;t3e volt nes sioun below by nmmber .of 's' fra• theautamobilellm:l modem = e.:: 4eddcEy stzleL Ibs able does not �3irEctnda2Il Loa f Isa�es ti�et� '+ec,� two-�� ,�,= ; ,am Serv'iCe comamEe a st�ndamd and shold be u e arr2- for reel pl,errinff ,3rc�lic?t1nn._ The ccmpunz mDieLs from vi-hh this table �daftwed sbDU3d be u.:;P.d far more ;q ci= nBnme:.;� i3hm rin aw1�:aboa:. The tabla an. r<vme co=qva =Ael:should ut be u:se for Paved cor its of interetdm :1aarL Mere more refted cpachmqws e=. Cikulaboas based oaplam nr; i 2dais of tLe Hna m d &.*, Trarr_l r_ awcity and Quahty of ShouldertSicrcle. senTice A rr,,1 Lane Ccnrera ae B C D E l ex4.1 of senwe !kr the bir r1e a=' T.�3e= tr= MWA'P�i is Lis able i3 base. or. 0-49% * 150 390 12000 mmber o Tehd ei. wt xmiter of bi.mdLi r ar Tees�ns uZM*4 the fa 5044% 11+0 340 12,000 `'1,0+00 sr pishaur are `rr pe�lS is sire di YricaoY the a=5 85400P,0 470 1,0+00 512000 fkw. PEDESTRIAN MODE & * C'amat be adnevei uskg cage mp= rdlu2 drffh2ts. (.% u1Jply irebide n h=es sho%m bel�* boy- mmber of •; Not appbbble fits char level of sentice IrwtteT �_ FCC � rn atawwbiia a� diirecticnz.1 ro3dwsT lane to de�rmme tnto-vmyw maidmum sen nke tivb=eZW ezearzx than LVvel of senzr_e D became F becmr inter a capa,mes EL�� vohnner.) been reacbai For tia bic de =od , the lh*►leI of:�e latter gadair�t�d� g Fj is eat ��-able becaie there i; nro mwdm �- *:*.hic a vehEme ±n=wholc u ann� table irim Sidewalk Ccnrerage B C D E tralua de: vidus 049% * 140 480 Source: 5{l- fro �1 1 0 9 Floni:la l�a==mr of Tsam4+oataciou: g5-1�D0'�� 20`0 5�-t� �$0=�I,OCIO S):tams lmglerrerat�. lice , hrtpi: �Us w idotgov. ° pluming, I 'sss' MIM BUS MODE (Scheduled Fixed Route)3 (Buses iu peak howii peak directiaa) Sidewalk Coverage B C D E 04$40io0 > 5 > 4 ' 3 > 2 8540fto > 4 > 3 2 > 1 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page � 10 WIA Prepared for Mr. Michael Saadeh GM Advisors LLC 434 Terracina Court Naples, FL 34119 Vlanning— Es�ecution —Results . Real Estate Econometrics, Inc. eal Estate Econometrics, Inc. Suite 100 707 Orchid Drive Naples, Florida 34102 (239) 269-1341 Ree-i.Com Executive Summary GM Advisors, LLC ("Applicant") is seeking approval for a proposed 125,000 square -foot neighborhood retail center ("Project") which could include an 80,000 square foot self -storage facility on the south side of Immokalee Road just east of Wilson Boulevard and west of Randall Road in Collier County's Rural Estates planning area and Residential Estates Subdistrict. The Project will satisfy the increase in retail demand over the next five (5) years in the retail market area as determined in this report. The County's future growth is congregated along the Immokalee Road corridor out toward the Rural Lands Stewardship Area ("RLSA"). The Property is strategically located in between the current growth heading east on Immokalee Road and the RLSA. The Property w and the market • Retail market expenditures potential is forecasted to be $411,785,656 in the next five (5) years. In addition, specific types of retail uses identified for the Subject Site and their related expenditures will grow over $23- million over the same time period. • The Project is strategically located to take advantage of the future retail demand and the traffic flowing along Immokalee Road. The Project will help address the demand coming to the Market Area over the next five (5) years. The Subject Site will also make signi Collier County in fierms of new salaries property taxes. ficant economic contributions fio and wages plus sales taxes and The Project will also provide self -storage square feet that will satisfy the projected demand for self -storage space that will accompany the population growth within the five (5)-mile market area and the demand that will be coming from the fringe areas around the three-mile market area. • The demand for self -storage in the five (5)-mile market area is currently 281,236 with no existing supply. There is a proposed 64,314 self -storage facility in the proposed Randall Road mixed use development, which is estimated to be built in 2024. The Pro ject's proposed 80,000 square foot self -storage facility is estimated to be built in 2025 and the Randall at Orangetree's 89.325 self -storage facility is estimated to come on-line in 2026. • If all three self -storage facilities are construcfied, the self -storage market area will still have a demand deficit of 59,661 in 2025 growing to a supply deficit of 89,864 square feet in the 2033 horizon year. The Applicant is seeking to develop three parcels of land that total 10.5-acres+/- located on the south side of Immokalee Road just east of Wilson Boulevard and west of Randall Road in Collier County's Rural Estates planning area and Residential Estates Subdistrict. The applicant is proposing aSmall-Scale Amendment to the Growth Management Plan (GMP) to change the future land use designation to a new commercial subdistrict and a rezoning to a Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD). Based upon the Concept Plan, the site is proposed to be developed as an approximately 125,000 square foot neighborhood center with the potential for an 80,000 square foot self -storage facility. The GMP application requires a commercial market analysis the 125,000 square feet of future retail development which co to 80,000 square foot self -storage facility. includes that both uld include 50,000 Real Estates Econometrics,"Consultant") has been retained to analyze the proposed neighborhood retail center and a potential self -storage facility for the Applicant. The Consultant is well -versed in prepa especially in the Southwest Florida marketplace. ring needs analysis studies The Retail Market Study starting on page 2 and the Self -Storage Market starting on page 16 are comprised of five (5) parts, the market demographics, the market analysis and conclusion. Study area Project Site The Projecfi is located on the south side of Immokalee Road just east of Wilson Boulevard and west of Randall Road in northern Collier County. The Project is well positioned for commercial activity with just under 1,000-feet of frontage along Immokalee Road and provides an ease of ingress/egress opportunities. With an average depth of 5004eet, the Project site has plenty of space to develop a neighborhood center. Figure 1 below shows the Pro ject's highlighted parcels. Figure 1. Project Highlighted Location s Source: Collier County Property Appraiser Immokalee Road and Randall Boulevard Planning Study Collier County initiated this Immokalee Road and Randall Boulevard Planning Study recommended through the 2019 adopted amendments to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan to evaluate the existing conditions, future conditions, a area. recommendations for the study The purpose of this Study is to identify the land use tools and infrastructure necessary to support future development within the Immokalee Road/Randall Boulevard study area. This Study developme is also intended to provide generalized, guiding nt of the area pending acceptance and approval by principles in the County. the There are two parts to the study — a public survey report that has been updated through March 27, 2023 (Appendix A on page 28) and a Planning Study for the area prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates in February 2021 (Appendix B on page 63). To date, the public survey has had over 55 respondents as shown in Chart 1 below. Chart 1. Category of Respondents to Survey. Q3 -Are you a resident, business owner, or just driving through the area? 55 E:] 15 4G 35 =U t �+ J Re�s�d�rt .lust OrN1ng Thtou� Source: Collier County Immokalee Rd./Randall Blvd. Study Area Survey Many of the survey questions were open ended, which elicited one -word responses or an array of comments. There were three questions that allowed for the responses to be charted and are relevant to the Project. Chart 2 on the next page notes that the survey respondents were looking for more shopping and restaurants as the number one activity for the planning area Chart 2. Category of Respondents to Survey. Q7 -What types of activities would you like to see more of? (pick up to 4) 45 4(I 35 34 25 20 15 iF. 0 Mare shopping and Restaurants Enhartoed or More t_artdscaping Source: Collier County Immokalee Rd./Randall Blvd. Study Area Survey Chart 3 below po to provide basic needs without over building. is commercial that addresses basic needs along with shopping opportunities as noted in the previous. ints out that the respondents' biggest opportunity for this area The Project will provide restaurants and additional Chart 3. Study Area Biggest Opportunities. Q8 -What are the biggest opportunities for this area? (pick up io 3) 35 30 25 �U I5 1� 0 G.n provde tsacic nc<ds mMhovt nvn tsu,'drr+g �t th. .'ldl c>3nnAcr�ed ha mdtiptr locations, rase of Staved JC Cf :: ' StYI hive trrrte to plan � de+�[opment Source: Collier County Immokalee Rd./Randall Blvd. Study Area Survey Finally, Chart 4 below challenge to the area is shows that according to local residents, the largest the lack of places to eat and shop. Chart 4. Study Area Biggest Challenges. Q9 -What are the biggest challenges in this area? (pick up to 3) 3�+ 2� zn I5 IC !J n tack of ptacr_s to eat and shop lack of skla was tack of pubik •,paceslparS�:, Stom�r�ttrltir+- Other ding tack of housing Source: Collier County Immokalee Rd./Randall Blvd. Study Area Survey Collier County commissioned Kimley-Horn and Associates to prepare a planning study for the Immokalee Rd./Randall Blvd. area. Kimley-Horn engaged the community with the previous survey and held two Zoom information meetings with the local residents shown in Figure 2 below. Figure 2. Immokalee Rd./Randall Bled. Planning Study rokalee Rd. andall Blvd. nning Study February 2021 ley -Horn and Associates Source: Kimley-Horn and Associates Immokalee Rd./Randall Blvd. Planning Study The main takeaway from the study was a focus on developing mixed use projects and to develop more commercial, retail and restaurant space to alleviate the extended drives currently required to other parts of the County for jobs, shopping and restaurant options. Figure 3 below shows the engagement. highlights of the community Figure 3. Immokalee Rd. Randall Blvd. Planning Study Community Engagement Community Engagement cc Keeping the natural h*aufy by not overdeveloping. >> • There is a common vision for a sustainable �� C�perttmitiestatxrldmaricet rate houwV and housing that is balance between (re)development and the environment without overbuilding the study it Ilave acoupleoftataurant area aptions. Sarre additional tram needs without over-buikJa d the • Extended drives currently required (to other 'L:1a. " parts of the County such as North Naples for « A?edrnorefestauranisand Wrote shopping. Need nxye things jobs, shopping, and restaurant options) for fanWiyacWities.:s • Main takeaways: (; Please pfeserve the area, build safer walking and bikitV and slow • Protection of existing environmental resources traffic 1) • More public open spaces 60 Iwould like p.'easantamcanives. • Increased commercial/restaurant/retail options but rotovordoro. Hospon.srblo bur7ding with opon public paces in • Improved roadways that provide for a reduction thomodomMomo. 5' in traffic and increased mobility options Source: Kimley-Horn and Associates Immokalee Rd./Randall Blvd. Planning Study One important aspect was addressed in the study. Kimley-Horn utilized the demand calculations prepared by the Consultant in a previous study in the area. The demand calculation showed that t a nd vacant) of 1,751,404 square feet here was a total supply, both developed with an existing demand of 1,213,473 square feet In the year 2020. The supply stays steady as it includes the vacant acreage that could potentially be developed as commercial. Figure 4 on the next page shows the table indicating the supply/demand calculation that includes the study area. The Collier Interactive Growth Model ("CIGM") calculated 1,691,867 potential square feet for the market area as noted in the County Staff report on the Commercial Needs Analysis Report noted in the figure. Figure 4. Supply/Demand Calculation including the Study Area. Determined the oversupply or undersupply of commercial space in the 1%inute drive time area both with the current existing and potential commercial square footage. • County uses a 1.15 allocation ratio as a measuring stick. DEO recommends 1.25 allocation ratio. The 2030 allocation ratio is below the County and recommended allocation ratio. Table 9. Drive Time Demand -Supply Calculation Retail Demand (sq. ft.) 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 Demand Per G1�1D Commercial Inventory 8 Population Retail Supply Developed Vacant Total Supply i ,213.473 1.335.420 1,579,788 1,875.21 G 2,209,305 2,58G,484 725,404 725,404 72`.404 725,404 725,404 725,404 1,02G,000 1,02G,000 1,02G,000 1,02G,000 1,02G,000 I ,02G,000 ------- ---------------------------------- ------------------------------------------ 1,751.404 1,751 t404 1,751,404 11751,404 1175 1.404 1,751,404 Allocation Ratio 1.44 1.31 1.11 0.93 0.79 0.68 Source: Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section, Cal!ier County Property Appraiser, ESRI ARCgis mapping system and the Consultant * "Commercial Need Analysis and Residential Market Study for Subject Property at the Northeast Corner of 4 August 26, 2020 prepared by Real Estate Econometrics, Inc. �t' Street N.E. and Immokalee Road Collier County, Florida" Source: Kimley-Horn and Associates Immokalee Rd./Randall Blvd. Planning Study Figure 4 above shows that the addition of the Project to the Collier County commercial inventory will not adversely affect the balance of commercial supply in the market and surrounding area. The Allocation Ratio is 1.11 in the Collier County Comprehensive Plan 2030 horizon year as the ProIect's acreage is already included in the vacant acreage total which is below the recommended 1.25 allocation ratio as suggested by the former Florida DCA now Florida DEO. The 1.12 allocation ratio in 2030 is 0.03 below the constricting 1.15 ratio the County has used as a measuring stick. 3.0 Retail Market Area Demographics 3.1 Market Area Definition Since the retail market is being analyzed, it is appropriate to define the market area for such use by using the definition of shopping centers utilized by International Council of Shopping Centers ("ICSC") and CoStar Realty ("CSR") (See Appendix C, page 86). i falls within the ne ghborhood The 125,000 square feet of proposed retail space retail center, the second smallest classification of retail centers according to ICSC and CSR ICSC and CSR defines strip/convenience centers as "convenience oriented". ICSC and CSR note that the national average size of a neighborhood center is 30,000 to 125,000 square feet on five (5) to 10 acres and generally has one (1) anchor. They have determined the trade area for a neighborhood center to be five (5) miles. Based on the ICSC and CSR definition, the Consultant used a five (5)-mile radius market area. The Consultant utilized the Environmental Systems Research Institute ("ESRI") mapping system to define the five (5)-mile radius. The ESRI Business Analyst mapping program is geographic information system -based ("GIS") that calculates the radius from the Project which for the extractio census data from that radius market area. Figure 5 below shows the five mile radius from the Project. Figure 5. Five (5��Mile Radius Source: ESRI ArcGIS Business Analyst Mapping System 4.0 MARKET ANALYSIS 4.1 Market Area Demographic Make Up n of (5)- The Subject Property's five (5)-mile market radius has a current population of 39,425 according to the U.S. Census Bureau and as shown in Table 1 on the page following the next page. That population is estimated to be 42,956 in 2028. The Consultant did not account for the increased population that just outside the market area due to the development of the Skysail and Rivergrass villages to the east and the rapid residential development growth coming down Immokalee Road to the west. The c impa urrem and future retail expenditures provided by ESRI do not include the ct those land use changes when forecasting future retail expenditures. ESRI's forecasts are based o n current conditions so the new development will begin to show up in the annual census community surveys are taken as those villages begin to have residents. The average household size is forecasted to diminish from the current 2.93 to 2.91 in 2028. The household size will be reduced as retirees continue to settle in the planned amenitized communities being developed in the surrounding Market Area. Household incomes over $100,000 within the retail market area will increase from the current 44.9% to 53.0% in 2028. This increase will require more retail opportunities nearby to support this income growth and reduce travel on local roads to distant existing retail opportunities. The population by age demographics indicate that a subtle shift to an older population will occur by 2028. Again, this is based on the current population base and does not factor in the two new villages in the Rural Lands Stewardship Area. The Consultant estimates that the over 55 population categories will increase significantly over the next five (5) years as the villages come to fruition and the retirees begin to filter into those communities. (Rest of Page Left Intentionally Blank) Table In S=Mile Market Area Demographic and Income Profile �� GM Advisors 5-Mile Radius Demographics Prepared by Esri 13062 Immokalee Rd, Naples, Florida, 34120 Latitude: 26.26U59, Ring: 5 mile radius Longitude:-81.59695 Summary Population Households Families Average Household Size Owner Occupied Housing Units Renter Occupied Housing Units Median Age Trends: 2023-2028 Annual Rate Population Households Families Owner HHs Median Household Income Households by Income <$15, 000 $15,000 - $24,999 $25,000 - $34,999 $35,000 - $49,999 $50,000 - $74,999 $75,000 - $99,999 $100,000 - $149,999 $150,000 - $199,999 $200,000+ Median Household Income Average Household Income Per Capita Income Population by Age 0-4 5-9 10 - 14 15 - 19 20 - 24 25 - 34 35 - 44 45 - 54 55 - 64 65 - 74 75 - 84 85+ Census 2010 Census 2020 2023 2028 24,619 34,479 391425 421956 71794 11,585 131448 141780 61449 - 101872 11,913 3.16 2.98 2.93 2.91 61600 - 121067 131042 11194 - 11381 11738 37.0 - 39.8 40.3 Area State National 1.73% 0.63% 0.30% 1.910/0 0.77% 0.49% 1.850/b 0.74% 0.44% 1.57% 0.93% 0.66% 3.53% 3.34% 2.57% 2023 2028 Number Percent Number Percent 624 4.6% 540 3.7% 522 3.9% 404 2.7% 570 4.2% 457 3.1% 11280 9. 5% 953 6.4% 21805 20.9% 21803 19.0% 11613 12.0% 1,787 12.1% 21825 21.0% 31390 22.9% 11315 9.8% 11880 12.7% 11893 14.1% 21567 17.4% $87,672 $104,287 $124, 314 $145, 615 $42, 43 2 $ 50,149 Census 2010 2023 2028 Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent 1,556 6.3% 21210 5.6% 21434 5.7% 1,837 7.5% 21517 6.4% 2,648 6.2% 2,215 9.00/0 21800 7.10/b 31042 7.1% 2,027 8.2% 2,488 6.3% 21581 6.00/b 1,230 5.0% 2,080 5.3% 11905 4.4% 2,681 10.9% 51127 13.0% 51446 12.7% 4,100 16. 7% 51290 13.4% 61158 14. 3% 4,098 16.6% 51268 13.4% 51329 12.4% 2,651 10.80/0 51269 13.4% 51475 12.7% 1,551 6.3% 41087 10.4% 41801 11.2% 558 2.3% 1,926 4.9% 2,579 6.0% 114 0.5% 364 0.9% 560 1.3% Source: ESRI and U.S. Census Bureau 4.2 Market Area Commercial Needs Analysis Basis is the existing commercial square feet and acreage within five (5)-mile radius of the Property. The floor area ratio ("FAR") within the market area is 7,436 square feet per acre. There are 27 vacant commercially zoned parcels totaling 71.53 acres in the market area. That would equate to a potential of 531,915 future square feet of commercial space using the existing FAR. The total number of existing and immediate potential square feet in the market area i3 2,645,442 as shown in Table 2 on the next page. Table 15-Mile Market Area Developed and Undeveloped Commercial Acreage SquareParcels Acres Undeveloped Commercial 27 71.53 531,915 7,436 Totals 111 355.75 276451442 Source: ESRI and U.S. Census Bureau Additionally, there are a number of PUDs and Overlays in the market area that need to be accounted for in determining the future commercial development potential. They are listed in Table 3 below. It is important to note that the Orange Blossom Ranch PUD recently converted about half of its commercial square feet to apartments, so they now have 100,000 square feet of potential commercial development. Table 3. 5-Mile Market Area PUDs Commercial Square Feet Developed Comm -Retail 2,113,527_sq. ft. Vacant Comm FAR 71.53 acres Total Vacant Commercial Sq. Ft. 531, 916 Orange Blossom Ranch PUD 1001000 River Grass Square Feet 801000 Hyde Park Square Feet 453000 BCHID Parcel 2301000 RCHID Parcel 451000 Randall Blvd. SubDistrict 404,448 Orange Tree PUD 3323000 IRRV Overlay 2251000 Total Vacant and Approved Commercial Sq. Ft. 1,993,364 Total Supply 4,106, 891 Source: Collier County Development Services PUD list and Collier County Property Appraiser By taking the existing developed square feet in the market area and dividing that number by the current population, the square feet of commercial development per capital can be determined as shown in Table 4 on the next page. The economic theory behind this concept is that markets continually strive for economic equilibrium where supply meets demand through price fluctuation. Equilibrium is the state in which market supply and demand balance each other, and as a result prices become stable. Market equilibrium is a natural point of convergence between supply, demand and price. At this point in time, the market equilibrium in the market area is 53.61 square feet of commercial demand per capita. Table 4. 5-Mile Market Area Comm ercial Square Feet per Capita 5-Mile Radius Commercial Square Feet: 2,113,527 5-Mile Radius 2023 Population. 391425 Commercial Square Feet Demand Per Capita. 53061 Source: Collier County Property Appraiser and ESRI The County population is growing at a five-year rate of 5.2% (Appendix D, Page 88). The Urban and Rural Estates areas account for nearly 10% of that growth. With growth continuing down the Immokalee Road corridor and the Rural Lands Stewardship Area beginning to blossom with villages and townsit is reasonabl ,e to consider that the Urban and Rura I Estates will continue to absorb a laraer portion or the Countys population growth. A population growth fctor of 26% Table 5 below shows the demand calculation for the 5-mile market area every five years through 2038. Table 5. 5-Mile Market Area Commercial Square Feet Demand Projection �� �2023 2028 � 2033 � 2038 County Population 4161607 4461284 4707999 4971083 5-Mile Radius Population 391479 551997 711522 881957 Demand Square Feet Per Capita 53.61 53.61 53061 53061 Commercial Square Feet Demand 2,116, 422 3, 001, 909 3, 834, 211 4, 768, 902 Source: Collier County Development Services and ESR Combining the demand calculation with the supply calculation, an allocation ratio can be determined through the 10-year horizon year and beyond next page shows the allocation ratio calc 2orizon year th . Table 6 on the ulation though the year 2038. In the Table 6. 5-11viile Market Area Commercial Square Feet Supply/Demand Projection 2023 2028 2033 2038 Sq. Ft. Demand Per GMD Commercial nventory & Population 2,116, 422 3, 001, 909 318341211 417681902 Retail Supply Developed Vacant Total Supply 2,113,527 1, 9937 364 4,106, 891 2,113,527 1,993,364 4,106,891 2,113,527 1,9931364 4,106,891 2,113, 527 1, 9931364 4,106, 891 Allocation Ratio 1.94 1.37 1.07 0.86 Source: Collier County Development Services, Collier County Property Appraiser and ESRI When the Property's 125,000 square feet of commercial space is added to the supply side, the allocation ratio increases to 1.10 in the 2033 horizon year which is again below the County's 1.15 allocation 7 ratio requirement as shown in Table Table 7. 5-Mile Market Area Commercial Square Feet Supply/Demand Projection with Project 2023 2028 2033 2038 Sq. Ft. Demand Per GMD Commercial I nventory & Population 211163 422 33 0017 909 33 8341211 47 7683 902 Commercial Supply Developed Vacant Total Supply 2, 238, 527 1,993,364 4, 2317891 2, 238, 527 1,993,364 4, 231, 891 2, 238, 527 1,993,364 4, 231, 891 2, 238, 527 1, 993, 364 4,231,891 Allocation Ratio 2.00 1.41 1.10 0.89 Source: Collier County Development Services, Collier County Property Appraiser and ESRI The future demand generally looks out to the jurisdiction comprehensive plan's horizon year, which is currently either 2033 to 2043 depending on the jurisdiction's comprehensive plan and growth management plan horizon year requirements. In Collier County's case, the Comprehensive Plan's horizon year is 2033 which matches the County's 10-year planning horizon. It is at this point Wine analysis that has caused an anomaly in determining a true economic supply and demand result. On the supply side, it is relatively easy to determine the amount of existing and approved supply from the property appraiser data. The difficulty lies in the vacant non -approved potential lands. Collier County Staff requires the Applicant to take all of those lands that have a commercial overlay on them and include them as supply by putting a floor area ratio figure to the acreage. The issue becomes apparent when all of the lands thafi are not in the existing or approved category are included in the particular land use analysis. By putting all of the potential lands in the supply category, the assumption is that all of that land would be developed as that particular land use overlay and nothing else. The flaw in that representation is all of fihose vacant approved parcels and parcels designated by the FLUM as having the potential to be developed as one use, which could be a non -competing or some other commercial use. The same parcels are also counted as competing supply when a commercial needs analysis is performed for another commercial use. Essentially, they are double counted in both analyses when they will actually be developed as the market demand dictates. A general economic principal states that all markets are efficient and that supply for the most part is generated as demand dictates. It is a rare situation where supply generates demand. The allocation ratio measures the amount of additional acreage required in relation to the directly utilized acreage to assure proper market functioning in the sale, usage and allocation of land. The additional acreage is required in order to maintain market level pricing and to account for the likelihood that certain lands wIll not be placed on the market for sale during the forecast horizon or may be subject to future environmental or other constraints. Thus, the lands allocated in the FLUM should be considerably greater than those that will actually be used or developed. Again, basic economic principles have shown that markets are efficient in terms of supply and demand and the ultimate lack of available commercial choices creates an impediment to the market functioning properly. One must also consider that not all of the office/commercial designation in the future land use map will be developed as such since the owners of those properties will only develop the land with uses that respond to market demand. The increased acres will maintain flexibility within the comprehensive plan, keep prices reasonable by not constraining land supply, and compensate for lands which may be unavailable for sale or subject to environmental or other development constraints. Growth management practices have suggested that the greater the time horizon of the comprehensive plan, the greater the allocation ratio needed to maintain flexibility of the comprehensive plan. Other factors that influence the residential acreage allocation ratio are the nature and speed of the developin g area History has shown that the former Florida Department of Community Affairs ("DCA") (Currently the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity) ("DEO") recommended an allocation ratio of 1.25 in the horizon year of a comprehensive pIan yet it had seen and approved allocation ratios in the 1.8 to 2.4 range and in some cases even larger allocation ratios for longer forecast horizons. Otherwise, if allocation ratios are not used in the analysis, then an appropriate breakdown of the potential lands between the various land use types needs to be undertaken in order to more accurately analyze the need for a comprehensive land use change. The County utilizes an allocation ratio of 1.15 as their allocation ratio value at the horizon year when determining how a project will impact the market area. The Market Area's allocation ratio with the Project is 1.10 in the 2033 horizon year which falls under the County's accepted maximum 1.15 horizon year allocation ratio. 4.3 Market Area Potential Purchasing Power Analysis Notwithstanding the Consultanfi's estimated increase in the over 55 population and their significant impact on the retail market spending power, the retail market area's spending potential will increase to $4111785 1656 over the next five (5) years. The total spending potential table is shown in Appendix E, page 90. While the total market area's spending potential covers a multitude of categories, not all categories will be a fit on the Subject Property. There are certain categories with significant spending potential over the next five (5) years that would be supported by retail businesses looking to take advantage of that potential. Those are shown in Table 2 on the next page. Table On Potential Retail Types 3-Mile Radius Areas of Potential 2022 2027 Potential Apparel and Services $14,359,442 $181563,530 $4,204,088 Computers and Hardware for Home Use $1,209,452 $1,564,120 $354,668 Pets $4,625,542 $5,994,655 $1,369,113 Toys/Games/Crafts/Hobbies $852,038 $1,100,901 $248,863 Furniture $4,512,396 $5,831,946 $1,319,550 Life/Homeowner/Vehicle/Health/Other Insurance $49,450,405 $63,983,058 $14,532,653 Personal Care Products $3,452,221 $4,463,541 $1,011,320 $78,461,496 $1015011751 $23,040,255 Source: ESRI, U.S. Census Bureau and Bureau of Labor Statistics — Consumer Expenditure Surveys The insurance, apparel and services, pet support, furniture and personal care products top the list of potential retail services that would be supported if located in the retail square feet of the Subject Site. Another retail service that would likely do well if located in the Subject Site is computers and hardware for home use. The closest retail computer store is located about 3.5-miles from the Subject Site. Almost all of the computer type services in the retail market area are located in residences so a retail computer sales and service business with a broad range of products and services would do well at the Subject Site. A more detailed look at the potential retail services that could service the retail market area is shown in Table 9 on the next page. This table shows that retail opportunities such as any kind of apparel, computers and hardware for home use, pet stores, furniture stores, homeowner and insurance companies plus personal care retail stores would fare well in this location. Table 9. Consumer Spending on Retail Types Apparel and Services Computer Computers and Hardware for Home Use Portable Memory Computer Software Computer Accessories Entertainment & Recreation Televisions Satellite Dishes VCRs, Video Cameras, and DVD Players Miscellaneous Video Equipment Video Cassettes and DVDs Video Game Hardware/Accessories Video Game Software Audio Rental and Repair of TV/Radio/Sound Equipment Pets Sports/Recreation/Exercise Equipment (6) Health Nonprescription Drugs Prescription Drugs Eyeglasses and Contact Lenses Household Furnishings and Equipment Furniture Major Appliances (14) Housewares (15) Small Appliances Household Operations Lawn and Garden (16) Housekeeping Supplies (17) Insurance 2022 �� 2027 Projected Consumer Spending $15,060,863 Forecasted Demand $191395,625 Gwth Spending ro $ 11334,762 $1,254,648 $1,617,453 $362,805 $34, 339 $44, 383 $10, 044 $69,819 $90,192 $20,373 $1391101 $179,096 $39,995 $23,3831216 $30,153,740 $6,770,524 $849,914 $1, 092, 355 $242,441 $11,838 $15,198 $3,360 $35,971 $46,263 $10,292 $1071630 $138,547 $30,917 $61,145 $78,621 $17,476 $2081792 $268,493 $59,701 $1171358 $150,856 $33,498 $8311025 $1,069,980 $238,955 $14,591 $18,809 $4,218 $51140,181 $6,641,308 $1,501,127 $1,4461036 $1,863,804 $417,768 $1,085,744 $1,401,230 $315,486 $2,342,$ 353 3,022,829 $680,476 $6881430 $887,612 $199,182 $4,727,537 $6,085,447 $1,357,910 $2,957,158 $3,810,525 $853,367 $6531580 $842,591 $189/011 $388/816 $501,533 $112,717 $3,722,184 $4,807,082 $1,084,898 $5, 637, 780 $7, 267,186 $1, 629,406 Owners and Renters Insurance $4,792,822 $6,179,296 $1,386,474 Vehicle Insurance $13,939,889 $17,955,384 $4,015,495 Life/Other Insurance $4,357,604 $5,619,786 $1,262,182 Health Insurance $29,805,812 $38,446,422 $8,640,610 Personal Care Products (18) $3,6071239 $4,647,141 $1,039,902 Source: ESRI, U.S. Census Bureau and Bureau of Labor Statistics -Consumer Expenditure Surveys Existing businesses must be considered when determining the highest and best retail use for a market area. The primary opportunities are shown in Table 10 on the next page. The entire existing business data base can be found in Appendix F on page 93. The primary opportunities for the Subject Site include clothing stores, electronic & appliance stores, furniture stores, finance & insurance businesses plus health and personal care stores. Location and size of the existing businesses must be considered when looking at the retail market area. Most of these businesses are located within a three (3)-mile market area. The overall majority of these businesses are serviced out of a home as opposed to a retail outlet. Those businesses are limited in providing goods and services due to their size and location. The Subject Site would be a significantly better location for those types of businesses to provide a broad range of goods and services in a centralized location. Table 10. Primary Retail Opportunities for Subject Site PRIMARY OPPORTUNITIES Businesses Employees Number Percent Number Percent Furniture &Home Furnishings Stores 3 1.0% 9 0.5% Electronics & Appliance Stores 1 0.3% 9 0.5% Bldg Material & Garden Equipment & Supplies Dealers 7 2.2% 12 0.6% Food & Beverage Stores 4 1.3% 178 9.00/0 Health & Personal Care Stores 5 1.6% 22 1.1% Clothing & Clothing Accessories Stores 0 0.00/0 0 0.00/0 Sport Goods, Hobby, Book, & Music Stores 1 0.3% 1 0.10/0 General Merchandise Stores 0 0.00/0 0 0.0% Insurance Carriers & Related Activities; Funds, Trusts 2 0.611/o 8 0.411/o Food Services & Drinking Places 7 2.2% 65 3.3% Source: ESRI, U.S. Census Bureau and Bureau of Labor Statistics —Consumer Expenditure Surveys One important business category that needs to be considered for the Subject Site is the restaurant and food purveyors businesses. The projected food and beverage spending growth for the retail market area is over $19-million for the next five (5) years as shown in Table 11 below. Food away from home spending growth is just over $11 -million, which is an indication that asit-down restaurant or fast-food restaurant use would do well in this location. Those types of uses rated very highly in the Planning Study survey noted in Section 2.0 This use is categorized as a primary opportunity in Table 10 above. It must be recognized that four (4) of the seven (7) eating and drinking places are related to golf course food &beverage operations, which is has very limited access to the general public. Table 11. Food and Beverage Expenditures 2022 2027 Projected Consumer Spending Forecasted Demand Spending Growth Food $66,204,983 $85,340,854 $19,135,871 Food at Home $38,757,263 $49,977,359 $11,220,096 Bakery and Cereal Products $4,968,132 $6,407,100 $1,438,968 Meats, Poultry, Fish, and Eggs $8,166,615 $10,529,557 $2,362,942 Dairy Products $3,915,227 $5,051,994 $1,136,767 Fruits and Vegetables $7,524,844 $9,705,995 $2,181,151 Snacks and Other Food at Home (10) $14,182,445 $18,282,713 $4,100,268 Food Away from Home $27,447,720 $35,363,494 $7,915,774 Alcoholic Beverages $47272,439 $5,512,890 $1,2401451 Source: ESRI, U.S. Census Bureau and Bureau of Labor Statistics —Consumer Expenditure Surveys 5.0 COMMERCIAL NEEDS ANALYSIS CONCLUSION The Consultant used all of the data and analysis in the previous sections to determine the total supply and demand for asmall-scale retail center sales in the Project's market area for the next 10 years. Using both the projected retail expenditures by retail type along with the existing businesses and future approved retail square footages, the Consultant then identified the types of retail businesses needed in the market area that would perform well on the Subject Site. The resulting analysis shows that the addition of t square feet of commercial affect the balance of c next 10 years. The Subject 7 it he Subject Site's 15,000 Area will not adversely ercial space to commercial demand over the Site is strategically located to take advantage of the future retail demand and the traffic flowing along oil well Road and Everglades Boulevard. The Subject Site will also make significant economic contributions to Collier County in terms of new salaries and wages plus sales taxes and property taxes. space to the arket The Market Area is currently assumed to be in equilibrium as economic studies is are efficient in terms of supply and demand and the have shown that marke future supply will be developed as the market grows and diversifies. acreage is already included in t The Project he vacant acreage total of the future commercial potential in the supple/demand calculations shown in Table 7 and w add ress the demand coming to the Market Area over the next 10 years. (Rest of Page Left Intentionally Blank) ill help The Applicant is exploring the potential for self -storage use in the Project. As Collier County continues to grow at a rapid pace, demand for self -storage space in the County exceeds the national average as more and more people from out of state find that Florida homes lack the basement and attic space to accommodate the belonging that occupy those spaces from their northern homes. In a story that appeared in the Naples Daily News two years ago (Appendix G, Page 95), data collected by Maxwell, Hendry & Simmons, LLC, a Southwest Florida real estate appraisal firm, noted that Collier County has approximately 9.02 square feet of storage space per person, which exceeds the national average of about 6.5 square feet of storage space per person. It should be noted that the square foot demand for storage space is much higher in the urban area of Collier County. The Naples urban area shows a demand of 16.42 square feet per capita (Appendix H, Page 98). Gerald Hendry, astate-certified real estate appraiser with the firm, pointed out that unlike other areas of the country, Southwest Florida doesn't have basements or other areas to store items that have been accumulated over the years. He also said that other storage components such as open storage for boats and RVs are in high demand as most of the communities that have been developed over the past few decades in Southwest Florida are deed restricted with no options for this type of storage. Mr. Hendry pointed out that the popularity of self-sfiorage facilities has paralleled the dramatic growth of rental apartment complexes in Lee and Collier Counties. He said that those units are small with limited storage thus many renters are opting to have a storage unit to store their extraneous items until such time they move into a larger living area. In a related self -storage story (Appendix I, Page � 00), Matt Price, CEO of Seagate Development points out that self -storage will always be gif in Florida because of the lack of basements and the extra storage space in an attic is too hot. He also said that there are a lot of people here and there is not a lot of places to put stuff. Ji -t Collier Blvd. immol�atee Road A VYilson Blvd. N. lap 0 .elf Wit 4t♦ a } �, ►46 4 i « Well Road P -Ever 1 �j • Randall Blvd. �t //�JJ/ , ��.=, � � � ` �� � � Golden Gate Bi vd. VIA,• «rt r.. �. y� w w The Consultant utilized Radius Union, an online tool that tracks self -storage market demographics, occupancy and rental rates in addition to new and existing self -storage supply. Figure 7 below indicates the location of existing and proposed self -storage facilities within a 5-mile radius of the Subject Site. There are (2) proposed self -storage facility in the Market Area. FIGURE 7. Subject Site 5-Mile Radius Self -Storage Supply " ` *t Immokalee Road # Subject Site i �V • ' F IF.. «►;*�-fir •� � e iW ritSl 9 � � }} s Wilson Blvd. Collier Blvd. Oil Well Road .N� t r r Randall Blvd. et 1 Source: Radius Union and Consultant Table 12 below identifies the two (2) proposed facilities and one (1) existing facility by map ID, name, address, square feet and year built. TABLE 42. Subject Site 5-Mile Radius Self -Storage Supply Map ID Facility Address Square Feet Permitted SF Year Built 1 Proposed in Mixed Use Site Randall Road 0 64,314 N/A 2 Outdoor Storage Facility Crystal Lake Drive 671532 0 Pre-2020 3 Proposed in Mixed Use Site Immokalee Road 0 89325 N/A 671532 153,639 Source: Radius Union, ESRI and Consultant Radius Union also provides demographic information for the Market Area. They utilize the same American Community Survey data that is provided by the U.S. Census Bureau as an annual update to their decennial census. The most recent decennial census was in 2020. The Consultant also uses the same data in its market studies as that data is provided by the Environmental Systems Research Institute's ("ESRI") geographic information system. Table 13 below encapsulates the 5-mile radius demographic data. TABLE 13. Subject Site 5-Mile Radius Demographics Population Year Population Growth Households Single Family Multifamily Renter Occupied Average Household Income Median Household Income Per Capita Income Median House Value Household Size 39,425 1.41% 13,448 11,969 1,479 1,381 $1451615 $1041282 $501149 $2511607 Source: Radius Union and U.S. Census Bureau 29 The Consultant next prepared the supply/demand analysis table using the data from previous Tables 1 & 2. The demand side of the equation was calculated by first using the Market Area population of 15,570 in the decennial year 2020 as the base year. The Collier County Growth Management Department estimates that the 1-year population growth between 2023 and 2024 is 1.4% for the Urban Estates Area (Appendix D, Page 88) The 1.4% growth figure was used to calculate future population growth for the Market Area. In order to determine the square footage demand for self -storage in the Market Area, the Consultant used the per capita demand for the County as there are currently no self -storage facilities in the Market Area. The existing self -storage square footage in the County (3,679,807) was divided by the County population (379,345) to determine the square foot per SF per capita) as shown in Table 14 below. capita demand for self -storage (9.70 TABLE 14. Collier County Self -Storage Demand Per Capita Colllier County Existing Net Self -Storage Square Feet 3,679,807 Collier County Permanent Population (2020 Census) 379,345 Collier County Self -Storage Square Feet per Capita 9.70 The Consultant took many homes on five Source: Radius Union and U.S. Census Bureau into consideration that the rural estates area con (5)-acre lots which have the room to accommodate sists of its own self -storage. By taki per capita demand, capita demand for th ng e out those homes as a percentage of the overall County the per capita demand would better reflect the actual per 5-mile market area. The following Table 15 below shows the percentage of homes in the 5-mile market area or urban clusters. that are in either urban areas TABLE 15. Subject Site 5-Mile Radius Housing Profile ?sri 0 GM Advisors 5-Mile Radius Prepared by Esri 13062 Immokalee Rd, Naples, Florida, 34120 LaL!L.L:u��L: 26.27613 Ring: 5 mile radius Longitude:-81.61083 Census 2020 Housing Units Number Percent Total 91076 100.0% In Urbanized Areas 3,290 36.2% In Urban Clusters 3,017 33.2% Rural Housing Units 21768 30.5% Source: Esri forecasts for 2023 and 2028. U.S. Census Bureau 2010 decennial Census data converted by Esri into 2020 geography. Source: Radius Union and U.S. Census Bureau By removing the rural housing units from the pe per capita demand for self -storage units coming 6.84 square feet as shown in Table 16 below. r capita calculation, the actual from the 5-mile market area is TABLE 16. Subject Site 5-Mile Radius Self -Storage Demand Per Capita Collier County Self -Storage Square Feet per Capita Percent in Urbanized Areas and Clusters Adjusted 5-Mile Market Area Square Feet Per Capita Source: Radius Union and U.S. Census Bureau 9.70 70.5 6.84 With the 5-mile market area population projections and the adjusted square feet per capita both calculated along with the current and future supply identified, the next step is to determine the supply/(deficit) of self -storage space through the horizon year of 2033. The existing self -storage facility on Crystal Lake Drive was eliminated from the calculations since it basically serves the Crystal Lake property owners (Figure 8 on the next page). FIGURE 8. Crystal Lake Drive Self Storage Facility h NN" lY►v► IiM' ►rr+�� wr r "0 40 TOMANq A, OM -.WV 0 LAQ PROPe" OM/l&'t at i L"Wv4d i row Source: Collier County Property Appraiser The proposed mixed -use self -storage facility was then added to the supply in 2024, the Pro Iect's 80,000 self -storage square feet in 2025 and the Randall at Orangetree in 2026. Table 17 below shows those calculations through a 10-year horizon from 2023 to 2033. TABLE 17. Subject Site 3-Mile Market Area Self -Storage Supply/Demand Analysis 2020-2026 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 3-Mile Population 39,425 39,981 40,545 41,116 41,696 42,284 42,880 Demand per Capita 6.84 Demand 269,667 New Projects) 0 6.84 273,469 U 6.84 277,325 0 6.84 281,236ra 285,201 64,314 6.84 289,222 80,000 293,300 89,325 Supply 0 0 0 0 64,314 144,314 233,639 Supply/(Defecit) (269,667) (273,469) (277,325) (281,236) (220,887) (144,908) (59,661) TABLE 17. Continued, 2027-2033 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 3-Mile Population 43,485 441098 441720 451350 45,990 461638 471296 Demand per Capita Demand New Projects) 6.84 297,43 6 301,630 C1� 6.84 305,883 0 6.84 310,196 C1] 6.84 314,569 0 319,005 6.84 323,503 C1� Supply 233,639 233,639 233,639 233,639 233,639 233,639 233,639 Supply/(Defecit) (63,797) (67,991) (72,244) (76,557) (80,930) (85,366) (89,864) Source: Radius Union, U.S. Census Bureau & Consultant Table 17 above indicates that the starting in the year 2023, showing a 281,236 square foot deficit of self -storage demand from the new population growth. The addition completed in 2024, the proposed 80,000 square feet in space of the Market Area is to address the 64, 659 25 and the 89, 325 square feet 20 are feet square feet in 2026 brings the deficit down to 59,661 squ in 2026. Additional Market Area self -storage facilities will be required in subsequent to address the future demand, which will still outpace the supply of self -st by nearly 90,000 square feet in the 2033 horizon year. ears orage y The Self -Storage analysis shows that there will be a continued demand for self - storage space in the 5-mile market area and that demand will be fueled by the emergence of the nearby villages and towns now being planned in the RLSA. ublic Survey Repor andall Blvd Planning Study -Community Survey 2 112023 6. 03 P M EDT Are you a resident, business owner, Or just driving through the area? 0 Resident # Field 1 Resident 2 Business Owner 3 Just Driving Through Business Owner Showing rows 1 - 4 of 4 Just Driving Through Choice Count 94.74°fo 54 0.OQ% 0 5, 26°fa 3 57 Q4 -HOW long have you been in this area? 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Less than 1 year # Field 1 Less than 1 year 11 1 to 5 years 12 6 to 10 years 13 11 to 15 years 14 More than 15 years 1 to 5 years 6 to 10 years Showing rows 1 - 6 of 6 11 to 15 years More than 15 years Ci101Ce Count 5.26% 3 35.00% 20 19.30% 11 14, 04°l0 8 26.32% 15 57 Q5 -What is one word you would use to describe the area today? DtAsine uS g �s, I iA III I kAl What is one word you would use to describe the area today? Overcrowded Annoying business Growing g Busy Underdeveloped Desolate Best area to live in Overly polulated with homes lackluster Not enough ammenties Having potential Vacant Far Casual Beautiful Nothing happening Growing Congested Country Depressing Peaceful Randall & Immok intersection poorly planned. Need more business and shoppng Dismal limited Undeveloped lacking Somewhat unsafe. Fast driving, Lack of traffic calming. Growing livable Not developed Peaceful Dangerous Estates Mixture quiet ! " iI i • i i i !" . .. !ST Serene peaceful Needing more stores, restaurants underdeveloped rural Clustered Up and coming Congested Jammed Empty Full DESTROYED over crowded villages creating dangerous traffic, accidents, destruction of environment. Q6 -What one word describes your vision for the area (b-IU years from now)? suLdLestain �Nhat one word describes your vision for the area (5-10 years from now)... Finished acceptable C roved e d Supermarket Anything but the funnel it is now. 0 what one word describes your vision for the area (5-10 years from now)... More shopping area More business, hospital, restaurant, supermarket Eventful Uncontrolled Commercial development, wider roads Convenience Useful Family community Rural Crowded Stores and supermarket option Convenient Sustainable Peaceful Diverse Rural Thriving what one word describes your vision for the area (5-iu years from now)... Peaceful Beautification Commercial open Commercial integrated Some mixed use development, but mostly preserved as natural area would be best. Improved walkability and bikeability. Peaceful Value more shopping Growing, accomodating Safe Estates Growth congested Respectful) What one word describes your vision for the area (5-10 years from now)... valuable Continued commercial plazas sustainability cluttered Swarmed Crowded Estate neighborhood Variety Commercial Homey CONGESTED If no control will be worse than Miami. Q7 -What types of activities would you like to see more of? (pick up to 4) 45 35 30 n # Field More Shopping and Restaurants Better o r More Bicycle and Pedestrian Connections 1 More Shopping and Restaurants 2 More Office Space 3 Better Roads Better Roads 4 Better or More Bicycle and Pedestrian Connections 5 More Open Space 6 More Residential Choices 7 Enhanced or More landscaping 8 Better Building Designs Enhanced or More Open Vlore Space Landscaping Showing rows 1 - 9 of 9 More Residential Choices Better Building Designs More Office Space Choice Count 2�.45a�o 41 18. (J6% 28 22.58% 35 14.32% 16 4.52% 7 12.26°l0 19 4.52°l0 7 155 Q8 -What are the biggest opportunities for this area? (pick up to 3) 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 # Field Can provide basic needs without over building in tl�e area 1 Still have time to plan for development Well connected to multiple locatior�s, ease of travel/access 2 Can provide basic needs without over building in the area 3 Well connected to multiple locations, ease of traveUaccess 4 Other Showing rows 1 - 5 of 5 Still have tune to plan for development Other Choice Count 22. �2°fo 19 40.48% 34 27.38% 23 9.52% 8 [EMS 11LIPM1111 iIIII iI IIIII III, IRAN ilium= Keeping the natural beauty by not overdeveloping. Opportunities to build market rate housing and housing that is affordable. Link this area to Immokalee for (not sure -need more time to think). Have a couple restaurant options. Some additional basic needs without over building the rural estates area. Need more restaurants and more shopping. Need more things for family activities. need post office nearby. Keep it rural. Also Why does the previous question not prove life for "less" times? Less noise, less night sky lightllight pollution, less compact development (which is Intentionally meant for villages and towns of RFMUD and RLSA) Do not permit dense villages or increase units in already developed communities -Orange Blossom Ranch for one. NO high-rises or town homes in communities, no building of landlocked villages that require destruction of environment of property of current residents to provide access road for theses RLSA villages. Q9 -What are the biggest challenges in this area 25 - 20 - 15- 10- 5- 0 Lack of places to eat and shop # Field 1 Lack of places to eat and shop 2 Lack of housing 3 Traffic 4 Lack of public spaces/parks 5 Lack of sidewalks 6 Stormwater/flooding 7 Other Traffic Lack of sidewalks ? (pick up to 3) Lack of public spaces/parks Showing rows 1 - 8 of 8 Sto rmwater/flo 0 ding Other Lack of housing Choice Count 28. (JQ°fo 35 2.44% 3 27.20°fo 34 13.6C}% 17 24.80°�0 26 4.so°�o s 3.2Q°/n 4 125 Need post office, banks, government office Lake of places to eat. Overdevelopment of rural residential neighborhoods. Increased traffic due to villages and increasing units in communities. Destruction of the Rural Area to satisfy developers I I'll i MIMpnic area o... Collier Fort Myers Airportlpine ridge/vanderbilt Walmart, Sams Club, Costco Juliet blvd, tarpon bay plaza mmokalee rd/ Tarpon Plaza Depends -Costco is farthest place away Pine ridge road North Naples North naples North Naples Usually to the area around Collier Blvd. and I mmokalee Rd as it's the closest North Naples Mercato, 5th avenue Downtown naples 951ICollier Blvd Collier & I mmokalee -Pine Ridge &Airport Pulling North Naples 41 and airport corridors. Mercado, intersection of corkscrew and immokalee, 41. Publix L'Appetite II. CVS. Pine ridge/airport pulling or Naples Blvd Collier, Naples East of Collier immokalee road corridor Mercado area usually North Naples Pine Ridge Naples Blvd Pine ridge or Valencia - - • • • IN • • • OMMIN ! i s a • # • ! - • • Immokalee rd and collier blvd 951IPebblebrook, Cogan landing, golden gate city, west of 951 Immokalee rd Immokalee Road west of 951 Pebblebrooke area Collier and Immokalee, Pine Ridge corridor 34105-34109 Naples Costco Ave Maria and Naples North naples Naples North Naples Naples Immokalee/951 Naples Stores along pine ridge or 951 Where do you go for shopping, restaurants, etc. (general geographic area on... I n Naples, Bonita Springs • " • • .''. What drew you to this area? Being away from the city. Affordable homeownership Space not living on top of each other I.NO H.O.A. to have to put up with Development Having land for my children and being away from all the "city" lights/more open space. We bought our first home of Everglades and 39th ne My husband grew up in golden gate. I grew up in Immokalee. Price for the home was a Lot more reasonable then 29 minutes west Close to my work, quiet Peaceful Cost and type of housing Peace Price of homes Urban area with mix of residential and commercial offering a variety of options. The fact that there are actual things to do and places to eat Affordable with a good school district Fine d4ning What drew you to this area? Not congestrd Value Demographics of Collier County especially Naples and North Naples. Then newspaper ad for new homes. Affordable housing with large lot. Born and raised in Naples. Moved from Naples Park in 1994 because it was growing to fast. Moved to U�lson blvd for peace and quite. Now out of Everglades and it's crazy insane busy. Sadly we are turning into Miami.:( Being rural, having few neighbors. Houses not be built on top of one another. Only area we could afford housing. The privacy on 4th st Schools Unable to have a boat on property in most areas peaceful, quiet, safe, affordable Property. housing prices and potential Cycling and natural area/wildlife viewing. less congestion and more reasonable home prices Quality of fife with Children lovely spot and acreage. what drew you to this area? Nice home The peace and quiet, lack of street lights, lack of neighbors, noise and intrusion. I have completed this survey before and you persist in not listening and continuing with your plans for building. It is Golden Gare Estates for a reason and it has nothing to do with your plans. Affordable housing Rural, quiet, dark skies, ag, large lots, wildlife, away from commercial and compact housing developments and one of the few alternatives to gated communities Price of housing with bigger lots Quiet, lots of green space, not a lot of traffic or other noise 4th street has always been unique to the estates. It's a quiet street. Great neighbors. I was born and raised in a city. Came here and just fell in love with this street. It's close to Immokalee Road for easy access but once I'm home it's quiet and relaxing. Not a lot of traffic, just neighbors. Can exercise on the street without a lot of cars and enjoy the wildlife. Close to work, serenity Growing area, reasonable housing, The remote area with land Rural enviroment and being surrounded by major parks. Beautiful landscape, wonderful weather, and clean city. Cost of living Peace, large parcels, low traffic Bigger property. Still near commercial. The country feel What drew you to this area? Cost of living, fast travel to town. There was going to be a big town center opening up in Rural Lands west but now that the project is canceled there's a dearth of commercial. Housing Seclusion, quiet (not so much anymore), large property The open spaces, lack of heavy traffic and auto pollution. The sound of birds, wind in the trees, now it is cars - construction. The sightings of wildlife -the rural environment the quiet away from city noise and pollution. To have pets, and no restrictions as to what the color of my house is, to be able to have a flag pole in my yard, to plants the plants I want - to have a garden. To sit on my lanai and enjoy the sounds of the birds, and frogs and breath fresh air and watch the sun set in the distance. IPL12 Wh," other • ` or • •hts would you like to snare wit us a/ What other comments or thoughts would you like to share with us 0 Driving in the Estates is extremely difficult. I understand wanting to bring more business and opportunities to this area, but without updating the roads and making the already difficult situation better FIRST, then the residents will always be the losers. Definitely this place need to be considered to build a Walmart Superstore. The majority of the people I know, needs to drive more than 40 minutes specially those who lives in I mmokalee and Ave Maria. like that there is growth but we don't need more buildings. We need more parks and areas for our children to play. I travel into town every single morning. My two choices of just getfiing onto Immokalee rd are either oilwell, where theres a school zone and traffic is always hell or I can take Everglades to randall then up to I mmokalee, Randal is al always packed with school buses. Its like a funnel out here trying to get into the city. think more development with places like Target, Costco, and other big name stores would thrive out this way. Also would allow smaller store fronts like Logan landings to have a chance to thrive. We need restaurants and shopping. Provide more shopping centers Some restaurants and a small amount of shops with a small park to walk in with a dog park would be great! Beautiful, serene Naples is becoming a nightmare. Would like a commercial subdistrict The area in question needs to be developed further in terms of shopping, dining etc as housing is already abundanfi. There are far too many houses end far too little goods and services available. Please add family entertainment like mini golf You need to highlight how new growth will be paid for -what is the additional cost to existing homeowners. Describe how large property owners can shift the cost of roads, water, electric, etc. to homeowners. We need you to represent us, not local lawyers, real estate agents or large land owners. We elected you to protect us. THX What other comments or thoughts Would you like to share with us? Whatever growth is planned, I hope very much that it is a priority to preserve and protect as much of the environment and the animals that inhabit the area is made. We've already developed a huge portion of Collier County and the space for wildlife is dwindling with every acre that becomes another plaza with a salon, wireless store and drive-thru coffee shop. You have been hearing for years now that are area would be built up but nothing has happened. Things need to move more quickly. when people buy a piece of property expecting things to happen in their area and they don't happen it's very frustrating. Please keep a buffer of trees between your commercial development and our private homes on 4th st. Be aware 4th street will need to be rebuilt to handle any more traffic as it is very very narrow and in rough shape. Failure to do so will be a major safety issue for both traffic and pedestrians/walkers who are plentiful on this street. Redesign traffic pattern at RandalUl mmokalee intersection. Publix plaza entrance/exit poorly planned. Desperately need Turn lanes, shoulders, lights. Very dangerous to drive on I mmokalle. I'm maintain the peaceful and safe area as top priority but add some options for food/drinks. The Estates lacks goods and services to serve the rapidly growing population east of Collier Blvd. I support development in this area. you have a large population and potential explosive growth again, you need better access/ infastructure and commercial opportunities Please preserve the area, build safer walking and biking and slow traffic! Please don't over build the area and destroy the beauty of the Estates along with pushing all the wildlife out. Road Improvements to encourage growth and property value demand. Youre doing a great job. Civic association price should drop to entice more people to register. I suggest we look into changing the name of Oil Well Rd. my home. It's time to update the name of the road. Care about those who live here -wildlife and humans alike. It's seriously embarrassing when I am giving directions to What other comments or thoughts would you Like to share with us? Why is this Commercial area being broadened when approved commercial areas have yet to be developed. (Randall shopping Center, 47 Acres @a Randall curve, Orangetree 100,000 sf commercial, Orange tree Commercial). Why is this apparent attempt to change Estates zoning to expand commercial into rural residential (E) Estates Lots. Should this expansion of commercial developments be directed to the RFMUD areas? This should all be removed from consideration of commercial development. This "study" should not cloud a needed transportation infrastructure improvement (which is already detailed and developed) with and expansion of commercial zoning. Ownership of 24th Ave NE to Immokalee Rd parcels indicates multiple owners With the exception of two immokalee road parcels owned by GM Advisors LLC. Owner of parcels between 24th Ave NW and Immokalee rd is Trinity Enterprise Holdings, associated with the Catholic diocese of Venice - a church has been rumored on this site for several years. Please post these comments as part of the public record, and share with all who participate in the public information meetings via in-person,/sign-in sheets, email, survey and/or texts. Traffic will prevent further growth if not addressed. It is a peaceful, residential area and should stay that way. It should NOT become another concrete jungle like the intersection of Immokalee Road and Collier Boulevard. I always thought the park would go in the Randall curve area so I'm not opposed to growth. However, I feel that 4th Street NE residents should be taken into consideration. This project needs to be tasteful and respectful. It should not be overdone. As time moves on and more people move to the estates we need to remember that the estates residents who have lived here the longest moved here for a reason I would like pleasant amenities, but not overdone. Responsible building with open public paces in the modern theme. This will improve value to homes in the area much like Oaks Blvd area, rather than destroying them by installing an urban area in a rural setting We do need more stores and restaurants. Founders Square will be a real asset, but we could have more places near Oil Well Rd. and Randall. You are overbuilding the area creating an ugly concrete jungle. Also, the fast and speedy influx of people moving in quickly are proving to be problematic. Evidence proves, the larger the city the more degraded it becomes. Violence, lack of respect, and tons more issue will ensue. Look at the many examples of ugly, violent, and horribly run cities like LA, Miami, Sacramento, Stockton, and a plethora more. Stop BUILDING! Too much traffics, speeding is intolerable and dangerous on Randall as is passing cars. Need to get roads and development under control. Lack of infrastructure money is a concern. Improvements to traffic in the area are really needed, especially replacing 4 way stops feeding into this area with traffic lights that are working at minimum during rush hour. what other comments or thoughts would you like to share with us? BUT now this is being destroyed by the Greed of RASA developing densely populated villages and increasing existing communities to compacity and getting approve to change the code to do so. Creating more traffic, pollution, noise and diesel and auto fumes in what was clean air. Destroying our roads with heavy equipment, tearing up property to build access roads for the landlocked villages and installing dangerous towers so these Villages, and dentsThis . Q8.a -Sentiment Negative Positive 0 # Field Negative Negative Positive Positive 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 Showing rows 1 - 3 of 3 5.5 L•� 6.5 Choice Count 75.Oo% 6 25. oo°fa 2 8 1 Q8.a -Sentiment Score Mlnlmum Maximum Mean -8.00 IZI -2.13 Std Deviation 5.93 Variance Count 35.11 0 1 Q8.a -Sentiment Polarity Std Minimum Maximum Mean Deviation 0.00 0.00 1 11 0.00 Variance Count 0.00 E'� #MIN �w � � g � v x Q8.a -Topics Unknown 1 # Field Unknown Unknown 2 3 Showing rows 1 - 1 of 1 0 7 Choice Count Zaa. aa% 8 1� 't � February 2021 ley -Horn and Associates 64 65 :NW Where is the Immokalee/Road Randall Boulevard Study Area? • Located in northern Collier County • Approximately 9 miles east and 8.5 miles north of k75 • Approximately 277 acres • 55 parcels IMM4KALEE R�ADIRANDALL BLVD PLANNING STUDY AREA O LEGEND I!�I�AOrCALEE HD'RANDALL BWU PLANIitNG STUDY AHEk ', RESID'cNTIALES+ATE35U8D1STRtCT � RAN CALL BLVD CQFiI?A: RC!AL SU BDIS T R:CT RURALSETTLE►JEMT ARIA SUBDISTRICT 0 500 MO Z000 1000 Feet 25th AVE NE an Bluff CT OIL WELL RD ao � ee W M W Y Zrnr� z e 24th AVE NE DAL' L BLVD 67 LE END • 3 w Study Area Boundary All all OUR TASK t ( y i �. to� r 14a, .' t1 a al pappr PF Assess current conditions J _ @ 1,P rov' direction t , .. LI �s • r ' ide o address unique • _ a Or Pa Ir Stir req u irements IF 04 P real 4 '♦r dentify needs .• for future developme " y � {,. -(11 �,J. Analyze . -4 tat : *y 'I /31- s it rj r t " • Ali all,-K a -rr or a S...r—.. s,.. .i. . i t tM v n r .''f �' a IMP _- ti Or let _sulting J4 * r t�om, i AM;4b r - _ ,� `y Rin....Long�Range Poky •.� sy Guidance andIdentifyIng IIIrad1 --- i l F L all, ar ar IL at tr rawrar • at _ lr attar at t r , ;� 69 Summary of Existing Conditions • Collier County and the study area are expected to see population growth • The majority (58.4%) of the study area is vacant according to the County Property Appraiser • Note: includes "approved" but not developed • The majority (93.7%) of the study area is zoned as Estates • The majority of the future land use is designated as Estates Designation (9664%) LEGEND Estates Designation Rural Settlement Area District ' Study Area Boundary 70 41L Summary of Existing Conditions • Immokalee Rd. and Wilson Blvd. are operating better than the adopted Level of Service (LOS) standards • Randall Blvd, is operating at the adopted LOS standard • The combined Water Treatment Plants have no known deficiencies and are operating below permitted capacity • The North County Water Reclamation Facility has no known deficiencies • Development/red eve lopmen Water South Florida review tor st t will require Management District ormwater management S RANDALL BLVD !ti 24TH AVE NE W z 0 low 22ND AVE NE °O 71 inc/siding Community Community Engagement • Public input meetings on November 30th and on January 14th • Extensive comments provided by the public at both meetings • Public online survey available November 19t" -December 10tn • Gave the public 3 weeks to provide input • In total, 57 people participated in the online survey �'��'�lI]1.I]� Ftl�►Il� ��l'i11�,tfCltl �'����.lil r Zoom lyeetin,g* for r �mmokalee Rd Randall Blvd ' Planning Study -- — �: l t The FurF-use of this =t_da' is to j + r ■ Evaluate the �i3-gin` [��r•dit?c.ns� •hJTure � r ccndi ion_., and recornmer. datiors for i r r r '■ ldentty tha Iand uEe [jolt sr ' r infrastru=:ure. nlacessarr tc support r r fu`uYe de:iielopment vairhin the � In^moka_lea Rcad,�Randall 6c-ule':_rd r ■ Esteh?ish guiding principle_ in ti e C vanent •ate,:tne Brea. , r 'der='.►'el=ome }'cur attenda��c_ and fe_doack � r Qate h'lc•nday Pdovemtaer 30, 20�n 5.30 TIM location This mertir,�t, wi=-I (y�l treld x�inncc�lY usln�r Ypet:+ F.F._• .n i 1rrE 3?�3 iamlanl +_olCttr C,be+nEV rrrnt Crnti, 6�+: FA�ftlr,� rucrr 73 • There is a common vision for a sustainable balance between (re)development cnd the environment without overbuilding the study area • Extended drives currently required (to other parts of the County such as North Naples for jobs, shopping, and restaurant options) • Main takeaways: • Protection of existing environmental resources • More public open spaces • Increased commercial/restaurant/retail options • Improved roadways that provide for a reduction in traffic and increased mobility options Keeping the nature! beauty by not over developing. developing. C�ppartunities to build market rate houisng and housing that is affordable. - : Have a couple of restaurant options. ` ome additional basic needs without over=building the area. deed rt;or � r estaurants and r77ot e shopping. !Need r�7ore things for family activities. _ Please preserve the LT- ea, bcrilcl safer vtraikir�g and bikir ag end slow traffic. l would like pleasant amenities, but not overdone. Responsible building with open public paces in the modern theme. 74 Market Study* • By 2030 the commercial allocation ratio within a 15-minute drive time is predicted to be below the County's and DEO's recommended allocation ratios. • The Collier County inventory of condominium units will be negative by the year 2025. For the market area, the total supply of market rate apartments will be negative by 2022. • Projections take into account vacant land that can be developed as commercial or multi family residential and are still predicting a demand in the coming years. * "Commercial Need Analysis and Residential Market Study for Subject Property at the Northeast Corner of 4th Street N.E. and Immokalee Road Collier County, August 26, 2020 prepared by Real Estate Econometrics, Inc. 75 • Current future land use: 23 du & 700,000 sq. ft. of commercial • BEBR average is 2.36 people per household = 54 people • Population within a 5-minute drive time is predicted to grow by 8,479 people by 2040 • Study area can currently accommodate 0.6% of the projected population growth within a 5-minute drive time 76 • Mixed Use Development Opportunity: • Properties south of Randall Blvd. currently allow for commercial development • Instead of only allowing commercial... • Encourage a mix of retail, restaurant, office, medium density residential, and civic/public uses (i.e., post office, library, etc.) in response to public feedback • Encourage walkable destination that creates sense of place instead of possible strip malls • New mixed -use district will accommodate the population growth predicted by CIGM and the demand that is shown in the Market Study 77 Create a live, work and play environment and establish an urban form that is both aesthetic and unique to this place �'tIKIIC ��ACES � f�I�E�� �.rrr�E Protiide intrinsic environmental, aesthetic, and recreational opportunities to the surrorurding community rlIULTIb10DAl �a�Tl'��i7K Establish a highly connected, pedestrian friendly renter that integrates bicycle and pedestrian amenities including' - cross roadways • A (new) Randall Mixed -Use subdistrict for the properties at the main intersection of Blvd. and Immokalee Rd. • Encourage a mix of retail, restaurant, office, medium density residential, and civic/public uses (i.e., post office, library, etc.) • Provide mix of housing options for varied family sizes in capturing the predicted growth • Provide for the daily needs of residents • Attract and retain a sustainable employment base an d income to assist 79 • r Services +Community Comments 81 Conclusion • • • Next Steps? 82 Demand (per the Market Study)* Determined the oversupply or undersupply of commercial space in the 15-minute drive time area both with the current existing and potential commercial square footage. • County uses a 1.15 allocation ratio as a measuring stick. DEO recommends 1.25 allocation ratio. The 2030 allocation ratio is below the County and recommended allocation ratio. Table �. Drive Time Demand -Supply Calculation Retail Gemc�nd (sq. ft_} 2020 214)25 2a30 2035 2040 2045 Demand Per Grv1D Commercial Inventory & Population I,213,473 Retail Supply Geveleped 725,404 'Jaclilt 1/0261000 Total Supply I ,751,404 1,335,42U 72F,404 I ,026,OOU l ,751,404 1,57��,788 725,404 1,026.000 1,75 I.404 i ,875.216 725►.404 I ,026,a00 ,75� �1,404 2,2�3��,305 725,404 ,026,OU0 I.751.404 2,506.484 725,404 I ,a26,C�a0 1,75�1,404 Allocation Ratio 1.44 1.31 1.11 0.93 0.79 0.0$ Source: Collier County Comprehensive Plannit�q Section. Collier county Froperht Apprai ;er, ESRI ARCgis m�ippinq system and the Consultant * "Commercial Need Analysis and Residential Market Studyfor Subject Property at the Northeast Corner of 4th Street N.E. and Immokalee Road Collier County, Flc August 26, 2020 prepared by Real Estate Econometrics, Inc. 83 The Collier County inventory of condominium units will be depleted by the year 2025. The total supply of market rate apartments will turn negative in 2022 for the market area. Table 15. Future Collier County Multi-Famify Market lnven#ory 2020 2o2i 2022 _ Vacant Developed Units 1,060 673 558 558 558 558 558 Annual Starts 558 558 558 558 558 558 558 Remaining Vacant Developed Units 502 115 0 0 0 0 0 Future Inventory 2,061 2,005 11447 889 ,331 -227 -785, Source: MetroStudy Report, 111 Quarter 2020 Table 25. Apartment Study Market Area Supply -Demand Analysis °o With % of Units Income with rent Total Percent Rental up to Annual $800- Unit Surplus/Deficit yaar Pnnulatinn HnusPhnlds Rental Hnuseholds S100k Demand 51.900 Demand Market Suoolv Units 2020 297,813 129,054 19.8% 25,553 64.8% 161558 74.71ro 12,371 12,552 181 2021 303,051 1311410 19.8°/a 26,072 64.0% 16,686 7431% 12,467 121552 85 2022 308,289 133,766 19.9°% 261593 63.2olo 16,807 74.71% 12,557 12,552 -5 2023 313,527 136,121 19.9% 27,115 62.4% 16,920 74.71c.10 12,642 12,552 -90 * "Commercial Need Analysis and Residential Market Study 2024 3181765 138,477 20.0°% 27,640 6106% 17,026 74.71% 12,721 12,552 -169 for Subject Property at the Northeast Corner of 41h Street 2025 324,003 140,833 20.0°% 28,167 60.8% 17,125 74.71% 12,795 12,552 -243 N.E. and Immokalee Road Collier County, Florida" August 26, 2020 prepared by Real Estate Econometrics, Inc. Source: Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section, Collier County Property Appraiser, ESRI ARCgis mapping system and the Con=ultant Conclusion "Recognizing" that ongoing growth is essential to the study area's success, the County should: • Promote the preferr subdistrict - ed growth strategy through a (new) Mixed -Use • Allow for new/mix of uses such as commercial, office, institutional, and medium density residential uses • Provide appropriate density and intensity • Include incentive -based methods • Require enhanced bicycle and cede • Establish " context sensitive" strian facilities development standards civic, • Reflect community's vision for the area, are unique from other areas in the Estates, and which create a coordinated theme among new and proposed developments in the study area �• % Share Typical Typical of GLA Number Type of Shopping Center Aggregate GLA Industry Average Size Range (Sq. % Anchor of Trade Area Center Concept Count (Sq. Ft.) GLA (Sq. Ft.) Ft, Acres # of Anchors GLA Tenants Typical Type of Anchors Size GeneralmPurpose Full -line or junior department Super -Regional Mall Similar in concept to regional malls, but offering more 620 77813361548 10.2% 11255,382 800,000+ 60-120 store, mass merchant, discount 3+ 50-70% NA 5-25 miles variety and assortment. department store and/or fashion apparel store. General merchandise orfashion-oriented offerings. Full -line or junior department Typically, enclosed with inward -facing stores connected by 4001000- 40-80 store, mass merchant, discount 5-15 Regional Mall a common walkway. Parking surrounds the outside 600 35317951548 4.7% 5891659 8001000 40-100 2+ 50-70% stores department store and/or fashion miles perimeter. apparel store. General merchandise or convenience- oriented offerings. Discount store, supermarket, drug, Community Center Wider range of apparel and other soft goods offerings than large -specialty discount (toys, ("Large neighborhood centers. The center is usually configured in a 91776 11930,849,736 25.4% 1971509 1251000- 10-40 2+ 40-60% 1540 books, electronics, home 3-6 miles Neighborhood straight line as a strip, or may be laid out in an L or U 4001000 stores improvement/furnishings or Center„) shape, depending on the site and design. sporting goods, etc.) Neighborhood Convenience oriented. 321588 2,34017111371 30.8% 71 827 301000- 3-5 1+ 30-50% 0 Supermarket 3 miles Center 125 000 stores Attached row of stores or service outlets managed as a coherent retail entity, with on -site parking usually located in front of the stores. Open canopies may connect the store fronts, but a strip center does not have enclosed Anchor -less or a small Convenience store, such as a mini- Strip/Convenience walkways linking the stores. A strip center may be 68,936 911,202,922 12.0% 13,218 < 30,000 <3 NA NA <1 mile convenience- mart. configured in a straight line, or have an "L" or "U" shape. A store anchor. convenience center is among the smallest of the centers, whose tenants provide a narrow mix of goods and personal services to a very limited trade area. Special .. Category killers, such as home Category -dominant anchors, including discount 250,000- improvement, discount Power Center department stores, off -price stores, wholesale clubs, with 21258 990,4161667 13.0% 438,626 600,000 25-80 3+ 70-90% NA department, warehouse club and 5-10 miles only a few small tenants. off -price stores Lifestyle Upscale national -chain specialty stores with dining and 491 164,9031247 2.2% 335,852 1501000- 10-40 0-2 0-50% NA Large format upscale specialty 8-12 miles entertainment in an outdoor setting. 500 000 Manufacturers' and retailers' outlet stores selling brand- 367 87,368,113 1.2% 238,060 50 000- 10-50 NA NA NA Manufacturers' and retailers' 25-75 miles Factory Outlet name goods at a discount. 4001000 outlets Leisure, tourist, retail and service -oriented offerings with Theme/Festival entertaiment as a unifying theme. Often located in urban 159 23,498,769 0.3% 1471791 80,000- 5-20 Unspecified NA NA Restaurants, entertainment 25-75 miles areas, they may be adapted from older --sometimes 2501000 historic --buildings and can be part of a mixed -use project. ..Property of retail stores located within a commercial 750000- No anchors; retail includes NA Airport Ret EHConsolidation Airport Retail 62 15,452,860 0.2% 249,240 N/� NA NA NA 300,000 specialty retail and restaurants airport Total Industry Traditional + Specialty + Special Purpose MAW 1115,857 71596,535,7811 10000%1 65,568 Total industry Sources: ICSC Research and Costar Realty Information, Inc . (www.costar.com) 87 January 2017 COLLIER CdUNTY PERN'tANENT PdPUL,4TIdN ESTINtiATES and PROJECTIONS estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates Flmsnirtg Cn�n»trtni�h� 2000 �10 .ill 2�12 2�13 $�14 ;t•�mates �17 estimates �1$ By Planning Cornmcrnit~y �rrd City estimates projections projections projections �1 � �Q1 �22 projections 3 projections prof 2�4 e NN -North Naples ��,8�7 55,105 55,442 55,934 56,257 56,561 57,052 57,714 58,393 58,956 59,385 59,663 59,866 60,073 60,284 60,499 6 SN -South Naples 22, 02Q 28,859 29,490 30,269 30,829 32,037 33,318 33,842 34,304 34,882 35,372 35,617 35,787 35,959 36,135 36,314 3 CN -Central Naples 98,6d+ 18,856 18,917 18,994 19,059 19,146 19,253 19,422 19,580 19,634 19,675 20,021 20,653 21,298 21,954 22 3 2 EN -East Naples 24, � 7 2 22,322 22,340 22,370 22,390 22,540 22,818 23,076 23,361 23,699 24,714 25,784 26,244 26,714 27,192 27 2 GG -Golden Gate 3�,�9� 44,963 45,142 45,351 45,454 45,498 45,523 45,557 45,624 45,852 46,198 46,552 46,930 47,315 47,707 48,106 4 U E -Urban Estates � 7, 8�4 38,744 39,157 39, 784 40, 480 41, 594 43, 058 44, 469 45, 937 47, 508 48, 983 50, 034 50, 729 51,436 52i157 52-,891 b RE -Rural Estates 99,997 3d,760 34,861 35,015 35,141 35,337 35,753 36,686 38,566 41,048 43,895 46,559 48,741 50,965 53,230 55,539 5 M -Marco 1,3�J 1,221 1,223 1,226 1,263 1,319 1,476 1,775 2,057 2,228 2,356 2,434 2,439 2,444 2,450 2,455 RF -Royal Fakapalm 8,127 12,001 12,667 13,494 14,126 14,859 15,741 16,505 17,723 19,246 20,557 21,813 23,025 24,259 25,517 26,799 2 C -Corkscrew 1, 9 94 4,962 6,372 7,804 8,614 9,679 10,927 12,080 13,545 14,866 15,933 16,851 17,466 18,092 18,731 19,381 1 I - I m m a k al e e 22, 032 24, 303 24, 569 24, 745 24, 819 24, 868 24, 954 25, 083 25, 317 25, 593 25, 875 26, 090 26, 201 26,314 26,429 26,546 2 BC -Big Cypress 994 233 235 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 247 248 249 LTiiincor�oraled S�i�,f 22i, 939 286,328 290,414 295,223 298,670 303,679 310,112 316,450 324,649 333,755 343,185 351,672 estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates projections Cities � �10 r^A?11 �1� �13 �14 a115 �316 �17 �16 �l a � 358,354 projections �21 365,163 projections �22 372,101 projections �'�3 379,170 projections 0�4 Kf-J proj P c Everglades City 484 403 404 405 409 41$ 430 438 426 418 429 432 435 438 441 445 Marco Island 14, 473 16,428 16,482 16,539 16,582 16,668 16,829 16,983 17,065 17,221 17,472 17,604 17,621 17,639 17,656 17,673 1 Naples 21,332 19,494 19,518 19,590 19,563 19,529 19,632 19,966 20,270 20,633 20,993 21,230 21,565 21,899 22,233 22,568 2 Incarparaled S�+lt 3tS, 788 36,325 36,403 36,533 36,553 36,614 36,890 37,386 37,760 38,272 38,893 39,265 39,620 39,975 40,331 40,686 4 COUNT''�1I�tIDE T�T�L 257,�26 322,653 326,817 331,756 335,223 340,293 347,002 353,836 362,409 372,027 382,078 390,937 397,975 405,138 412,431 419,855 42 n otw: �� _rna�a osei metoa a na pro�aotlona ero GesaG upon tna apraeasnaat or par menant popuieelon praperaa ror �iprli �, ��� a nd 2��0-2��. E3t� meta) end preJootlona ero dorlvaG rrom dote oDtelncd from: 2� �.oneue end �'LQ10 �ansu:; 6uroeu of Eoono mlo and �ualnoss t�asaeron (BEBR) PaP��etion oullt-tins; Colllor .aunty �omprohonaivoPlennl n7 stern; •nd, Planning ateYt fro m Neplc: •nd i�eroo �ilentl. �� So mo or tho I otels rney not aquel tha su m of tn4 I nalvldual tlgura� aua to rouncfl ng. Pr�Fured by Collier County Zoning l�ivisior�, Jurte 1 A, 2Q21. 7711 10, Alk 13062. Immokalee Rd. 12804-13250 Immokalee Rd, Naples, Florida, 34120 Prepared by Es Latitude: 26.2761 Ring: 3 mile radius Longitude:-81.6028 20Z2 Housing Summary Housing Units 2022-2027 Percent Change Percent Occupied Percent Owner Households Median Home Value Owned Dwellings Mortgage/Other Loan Payments & Basics Mortgage Interest Interest Paid on Home Equity Loan Interest Paid on Home Equity Line of Credit Mortgage Principal Principal Paid on Home Equity Loan Principal Paid on Home Equity Line of Credit Special Lump Sum Mortgage Payments Special Assessments Closing Costs Property Taxes Homeowners Insurance Ground Rent Maintenance and Remodeling Services Maintenance and Remodeling Materials Property Management and Security Rented Dwellings Rent Tenant's Insurance Maintenance and Repair Services Maintenance and Repair Materials Other Lodging Owned Vacation Homes Principal Paid on Home Loans Closing Costs on Purchase of Property Interest Paid on Home Loans Property Taxes Homeowners Insurance Maintenance and Remodeling Property Management and Security Housing While Attending School Household Operations Child Care Care for Elderly or Handicapped Appliance Rental and Repair Computer Information Services Home Security System Services Non -Apparel Household Laundry/Dry Cleaning Housekeeping Services Lawn and Garden Moving/Storage/Freight Express Installation of Computers PC Repair (Personal Use) Reupholstering/Furniture Repair Termite/Pest Control Water Softening Services Internet Services Away from Home Other Home Services (1) 2022 Demographic Summary 5,903 Population 15,570 8.06% Households 51250 89.00/0 Families 41357 92.9% Median Age 39.4 $3551918 Median Household Income $106,370 Spending Potential Average Amount Index Spent Total 132 $21,452083 $112,627,346 133 $16,055.51 $84,291,449 144 $5,368.49 $28,184,595 104 $40.64 $213,377 117 $169.43 $889,521 138 $3,723039 $191547,806 107 $84.95 $445,963 134 $421068 $2,213,825 131 $11154.27 $6,059,900 97 $12.27 $64,400 143 $498207 $2,6141888 116 $3,599259 $18,897,863 130 $876057 $41602,000 135 $106015 $557,310 131 $4,280,66 $22,473,453 136 $954.09 $5,008,992 120 $162056 $853,452 87 $5,257039 $27,601,274 86 $5,098279 $26,768,662 98 $36.35 $190,822 112 $83.30 $437,326 117 $38.95 $204,464 115 $740074 $3,888,898 113 $617006 $3,239,542 120 $88.16 $462,842 109 $41.47 $217,739 120 $115036 $605,623 110 $171.21 $898,865 105 $16.14 $84,755 107 $146058 $769,557 120 $38.13 $200,161 125 $123069 $649,355 124 $31116.60 $16,362,128 129 $777.42 $41081,474 107 $76.01 $399,070 129 $36.76 $192,984 118 $890080 $4,676,713 140 $68.12 $357,642 107 $29.38 $154,233 125 $267091 $1,406,515 124 $708.99 $3,722,184 130 $105020 $552,313 131 $0.55 $2,878 118 $9.27 $48,675 122 $14.10 $74,015 141 $68.21 $358,104 129 $8.68 $45,570 118 $5.56 $29,202 140 $49.63 $260,555 Data Note: The Spending Potential Index (SPI) is household -based, and represents the amount spent for a product or service relative to a national average of 100. Detail may not sum to totals due to rounding. Source: Esri forecasts for 2022 and 2027; Consumer Spending data are derived from the 2018 and 2019 Consumer Expenditure Surveys, Bureau of Labor Statistics. April 28, 202 91 13062 Immokalee Rd. Prepared by Es 12804-13250 Immokalee Rd, Naples, Florida, 34120 Latitude: 26.2761 Ring: 3 mile radius Longitude:-81.6028 Spending Potential Average Amount Index Spent Total Utilities, Fuels, Public Services 122 $6,872.86 $36,082,519 Bottled Gas 126 $75.19 $394,733 Electricity 122 $2,517077 $13,218,280 Fuel Oil 96 $87.64 $460,096 Natural Gas 106 $624.53 $3,278,792 Phone Services 122 $2,399.02 $12,594,871 Water and Other Public Services 132 $1,152.38 $6,049,975 Coal/Wood/Other Fuel 187 $16.34 $85,772 Housekeeping Supplies 121 $1,073.86 $5,637,780 Laundry and Cleaning Supplies 124 $316018 $1,659,941 Postage and Stationery 124 $219035 $1,1511596 Other HH Products (2) 119 $538033 $2,826,243 Household Textiles 121 $139081 $734,005 Bathroom Linens 117 $21.46 $112,645 Bedroom Linens 121 $73.19 $384,226 Kitchen, Dining Room and other Linens 123 $13.29 $69,750 Curtains and Draperies 128 $23.20 $121,825 Slipcovers, Decorative Pillows 116 $8.68 $45,559 Furniture 124 $900248 $4,727,537 Mattresses and Box Springs 121 $160027 $841,404 Other Bedroom Furniture 126 $164299 $866,179 Sofas 123 $248894 $1,3061r932 Living Room Chairs 124 $72.77 $382,033 Living Room Tables 123 $24.76 $129,965 Kitchen, Dining Room Furniture 119 $70.98 $372,632 Infant Furniture 123 $17.64 $92,631 Outdoor Furniture 132 $55.48 $291,273 Wall Units, Cabinets, Other Furniture (3) 130 $84.66 $444,486 Major Appliances 131 $563027 $2,957,158 Dishwashers, Disposals & Range Hoods 138 $50.90 $267,225 Refrigerators and Freezers 136 $161.87 $849,802 Clothes Washers & Dryers 134 $161084 $849,679 Cooking Stoves and Ovens 132 $81.95 $430,219 Microwave Ovens 122 $25.91 $136,027 Window Air Conditioners 104 $9.33 $49,005 Electric Floor Cleaning Equipment 125 $39.77 $208,800 Sewing Machines and Miscellaneous Appliances 114 $31.70 $166,402 Data Note: The Spending Potential Index (SPI) is household -based, and represents the amount spent for a product or service relative to a national average of 100. Detai may not sum to totals due to rounding. Source: Esri forecasts for 2022 and 2027; Consumer Spending data are derived from the 2018 and 2019 Consumer Expenditure Surveys, Bureau of Labor Statistics. pril 28, 202 9 13062 Prepared by Esri 12804-13250 Latitude: 26.27613 Rings: 3 mile radii Longitude:-81.60288 Businesses Employees Number Percent Number Percent Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting 2 0.6% 1 0.1% Mining 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Utilities 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Construction 64 20.3% 199 10.0% Manufacturing 4 1.3% 27 1.4% Wholesale Trade 10 3.2% 31 1.6% Retail Trade 28 8.9% 256 12.9% Motor Vehicle & Parts Dealers 1 0.3% 7 0.4% Furniture & Home Furnishings Stores 3 1.00/0 9 0.5% Electronics & Appliance Stores 1 0.3% 9 0.5% Bldg Material & Garden Equipment & Supplies Dealers 7 2.2% 12 0.6% Food & Beverage Stores 4 1.3% 178 9.00/0 Health & Personal Care Stores 5 1.6% 22 1.1% Gasoline Stations 1 0.3% 12 0.6% Clothing & Clothing Accessories Stores 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Sport Goods, Hobby, Book, & Music Stores 1 0.3% 1 0.1% General Merchandise Stores 0 0.0% 0 0.00/0 Miscellaneous Store Retailers 2 0.6% 6 0.3% Nonstore Retailers 3 1.00/0 0 0.0% Transportation & Warehousing 9 2.9% 16 0.8% Information 3 1.0% 23 1.2% Finance & Insurance 6 1.9% 24 1.2% Central Bank/Credit Intermediation & Related Activities 3 1.0% 11 0.6% Securities, Commodity Contracts & Other Financial 2 0.6% 4 0.2% Insurance Carriers & Related Activities; Funds, Trusts & 2 0.6% 8 0.4% Real Estate, Rental & Leasing 9 2.9% 41 2.1% Professional, Scientific & Tech Services 28 8.9% 167 8.4% Legal Services 2 0.6% 6 0.3% Management of Companies & Enterprises 2 0.6% 47 2.4% Administrative & Support & Waste Management & 27 8.6% 154 7.8% Educational Services 10 3.2% 402 20.3% Health Care & Social Assistance 9 2.9% 76 3.8% Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 11 3.5% 252 12.7% Accommodation & Food Services 7 2.2% 65 3.3% Accommodation 0 0.0% 0 0.00/0 Food Services & Drinking Places 7 2.2% 65 3.3% Other Services (except Public Administration) 37 11.7% 128 6.5% Automotive Repair & Maintenance 5 1.6% 12 0.6% Public Administration 4 1.3% 73 3.7% Unclassified Establishments Total 47 14.9% 2 0.10/0 315 100.0% 1,981 100.0% Source: Copyright 2022 Data Axle, Inc. All rights reserved. Esri Total Date Note: Data on the Business Summary report is which uses census block groups to East Naples sees influx of self storage facilities along U.S. 41 hops://www.naplesnews.com/story/money/business/local/2019/10/16/eas... LOCAL BUSINESS ? Here's why I i ng an Andrew Wigdor �: Naples Published 7900 a.m. ET Oct. 16, 2019 Updated 4:10 p.m. ET Oct. 16, 2019 Development in East Naples keeps coming but not in the form some residents support. Self -storage facilities are popping up fast in Collier County, and East Naples is no exception. In particular, an influx of large storage buildings has been seen along the community's major thoroughfare, and some residents say these commodities ta�� up prime real estate on U.S. 41 that could be better used for upscale restaurants, hotels and shopping centers. In the 12-mile stretch from Sandpiper Street to Basik Drive along U.S. 41, there are nine self -storage buildings that have been built, are being built or are proposed. Of those, four are already built, four are proposed and one is in the process of being built. The self - storage building currently being constructed is Carl's White Glove Personal Storage & Wine Vault, athree-story structure that will be over 90,00o square feet. The projected opening date for the facility is Feb. 1, 2020. Bruce Nichols, the facility's wine consultant and owner of The Wine Store in Naples, defended the construction of the new storage building, saying that the "demand far outweighs supply for wine storage" in the area. "The demand is certainly there," he said. According to data collected by Maxwell, Hendry & Simmons , LLC, a Southwest Florida East Naples sees influx of self stot•age facilities along U.S. 41 https://www.naplesnews.com/story/money/business/local/2019/10/16/eas... real estate appraisal firm, Collie space per pe space per pe square feet of storage rson, which exceeds the national average of about 6.5 square feet of storage r County has approximately g.o2 't that have been accumulated over the years," rson. "Unlike other areas of the country, we don have basements or other areas to store items state -certified real estate appraiser with the firm, in an emailed statement. "Moreover, other storage components such as open storage for boats and RVs are in high demand as most of the communities that we have developed over the past few decades are deed restricted with no options for this type of storage." said Gerald Hendry, a 2 of 6 97 2/28/2022, 5:42 PM ial I��s tcr�s+ !�1 ! 1m 2m 2*A 4ti 7ft lam l---�! r�rrr� aM, f ! ::Sd�Crmga ilflpr�: !Wane � � 1' � � �1i'ttltr�!rRlpRie: • ar Gh 0 Y�11�Iiij Leta • ilrantllzC i Alt a=o OFF, Fowl — w---- F. fi„ • air �!; �.s�,y CCUniY{ Gkt7� - ' IF,IIIIII FA OFF& IF dot 41 r (! spiv WWI --- Glii•?'f� F o c Ca. fLoUEFAA WQ F � � / f 1- rosin f1�9'T�.��1'If~'GEs Fa�ziti�� ru Faf�ty ToCaS�r� ko�,ge C�riia:ir�rtf Mg 1� y%f.1 1f5.4� t+ F�-anrlrtGfitr ;'fed UQ�?'r�r�t4tLe' �l�i�k+ith- Developer makes big gains in self-stot•age � Business Observer � Busines... https://www.businessobserve�•fl.com/al-ticle/developer-makes-big-gains-i... '�T�TC1;�.7 d��7 ��� �� ii7 � �y i�r � d BUSINESS OBSERVER Developer makes big gains inself-storage SHARE f �` 0 THURSDAY, OCT. 29, 2020 1 year ago COMMENTS a r It doesn't have the sizzle ofmultimillion-dollar construction projects. But self -storage done right, discovers one area firm, could deliver a tidy profit. by: Mark Gordon � Managing Editor Seagate Development Group has built a brand in the Southwest Florida construction market by building corporate headquarters. The recent list includes a 150,000-square-foot complex for cancer screening firm NeoGenomics, a $60 million project in Fort Myers; a 52,000-square-foot facilityfor Conditioned Air of Naples; and a new, $11 million home in Fort Myers for logistics firm Scotlynn USA. Although those projects grab headlines, and of course bring in revenue for the $65.5 million company, Seagate is, more quietly, developing a profitable niche `The next 10, 20 years in Southwest Florida have a really long runway. I KT _E 1 of 8 2/28/2022, 6:16 PM Developer makes big gains in self -storage � Business Observer � Busines... hops://www.businessobserverfl.com/article/developer-makes-big-gains-i... Q terms of reaching profitable rent stabilization., company executives say —including one that opened in April, during the depths of pandemic stay-at-home orders. "Self -storage will always be big in Florida because of the lack of basements, and the extra storage space in an attic is too hot," Seagate CEO Matt Price says. "There are a lot of people, and. there's not a lot of places to put stuff. It helps that Seagate attacked the self -storage market with a counterintuitive twist. The traditional way developers build self -storage is to go near, next to or across the street from multifamily projects. Those are infill projects that, Price says, go where the "bodies are." Instead of that, Price says Seagate aims to build self - storage facilities "where the bodies are going to be." In that way, the company's approach isdata-driven on making the right land purchases as to where development is going to happen next in the Lee -Collier area. Combined, it paid around $3 million for the land where it built its first three self -storage facilities. Those locations are University Storage in Estero, a 90,000-square-foot, three-story, 600-unit facility; Ave Maria, a 51,000-square-foot, one-story, two -building facility; and Arbor Towne in Fort Myers, a 76,000-square-foot, 654-unit facility. Through Oct. 21, those facilities were 53.44%, 55.48%and 71.7% leased out, respectively. The goal is to get to PREv cupancy in each facility, which, says Bill Price, Seagate's chairman and Matt Price's father, wool NEXT ARTICLE ARTICLE �u��.. profit. "One of the best parts about the business is once you sign the lease, people tend to stay," ��u Price says. "It's very, very much an inertia business: Once you're are in, you tend to stay in." Courtesy. Seagate Development Group's Arbor Towne self -storage facility is on Colonial Boulevard in Fort Myers. Not only does Seagate loolz at future population patterns, but also the Witty -gritty ofself-storage, adds Bill Price, is in the ground cost per- buildablesquare foot. That's the combination of the cost per square foot for the land and cost per square foot to build the facility. Too high a figure, and the building can't set competitive lease rates. "That's really important," Bill Price says. Another key to Seagate's model, the elder Price says, is to partner with the right self -storage flag. For Seagate, that's CubeSmart, a Pennsylvania - based Real Estate Investment Trust that manages some 500seif-storage properties nationwide, covering more than 35 million rentable square feet. Working with CubeSmart is a nod to another lesson the company has learned: Stick to your strengths. "We quickly realized we had no clue how to do all this," Bill Price says. "We needed a sophisticated company with data algorithms" that could handle leasing, pricing, marketing 2 of 8 2/28/2022, 6:16 PM Developer makes big gains in self -storage � Business Observer � Busines... https://www.businessobservet•fl.com/article/developer-makes-big-gains-i... Seagate was approached by a business partner three years ago about self -storage opportunities. The firm did research and due diligence for eight months. "we really wanted to understand the complexities of the usiness, Matt Price says. area in the country.' Matt Price, Seagate Development Group With that understanding and the early success, the company plans to expand its self -storage portfolio. It's looking "seriously" at two possible deals, Matt Price says, and if "the land part makes sense, we will consider d0111g 1t." In the meantime, the company isn't slowing down on its headquarters or other projects. Like many peers in construction, 2020 was going really well until the coronavirus derailed it. "It hasn't been as bad as we thought," Matt Price says of the ensuing pandemic, "but we are aren't having the kind of year it was going to be before COVID-19." Long-term, Price remains all -in on the region's potential. "Z�he next 10, 20 years in Southwest Florida have a really long runway," Price says. "I wouldn't trade our Southwest Florida business market for Ynost any other area in t e country. PREY ARTICLE NEXT ARTICLE �-- Prev Article advertisement advertisement Next Article � Q 3 of 8 2/28/2022, 6:16 PM J:l�IJJ: r: ern PPrimptpr P PROPERTY o Zo LINE I0 50 Western Perimeter Buffer ffi U HOLEMONTES ENCINEERSILANOSCAPEARCHITECTS IPIANNERSISURVEYORS 950 Encore Wey Naploc. Florida 31110 Office: (2]9) 254.2000 We0: w.rJ/oM4onl�a.com / wwvll V Eng.cam F106Ma Cr" O/Aulho�irwm Na. 1772 NIM SUMMARY Immokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict GMPA (PL-20230002460) Immokalee Randall CPUD (PL-20230002458) Monday, August 7 at 59.30 p.m. Collier County UF/IFAS Extension, Multi -Purpose Room 14700 Immokalee Road, Naples, FL 34120 The NIM was held for the above referenced petitions. The petitions are described as follows: 1. Immokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict (PL-20230002460) The land use designation is currently Estates — Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict. This is a request for a Small -Scale Growth Management Plan Amendment (SSGMPA) to create the Immokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict to allow a maximum of 125,000 square feet of gross floor area of C-3 Commercial Intermediate District uses including up to 80,000 square feet of indoor air conditioned self -storage; and 2. Immokalee Randall CPUD (PL-20230002458) The property is zoned E-Estates with Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zone W-3 and W4 (E-ST/W-3 and E-ST/W-4). This is a request to rezone the property to a Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) to allow a maximum of 125,000 square feet of gross floor area of C-3 Commercial Intermediate District uses including up to 80,000 square feet of indoor air conditioned self -storage. Note: This is a summary of the NIM. An audio and video recording are also provided. Attendees On behalf of Applicants: Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, President/CEO, FIole Monies, a Bowman Company Norman Trebilcock, AICP, PTOE, PE, Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Jeremie Chastain, AICP, Planner III, Hole Monies, a Bowman Company Nicholas Pearson, Turrell, Hall &Associates, Inc. County Staff: Laura DeJohn, AICP, Zoning Services Katherine Eastly, AICP, Planner III, Comprehensive Planning Seven members of the public attended. Two members of the public attended via Zoom. Mr. Mulhere started the presentation by introducing himself, consultants, and county staff. He explained the NIM process, provided a brief history of the project. the property owner, the other the process for approval, and The following comments/questions were raised by the members of the public in attendance: Page 1 of 2 H:\2023\2023025\WP\PUDZ\NIM\NIM Summary (8-15-2023).docx Commercial Development Questions were asked about the proposed commercial uses. The applicant is proposing 125,000 square feet of smaller scale C-3 neighborhood scale commercial uses and indoor self -storage. If developed, the indoor self -storage use will result in less traffic generated when compared to the other C-3 uses requested. Questions were asked regarding commercial development in the surrounding area. Mr. Mulhere explained that the Comp Plan allows for commercial development to the east; however, the property is zoned Estates and a rezoning would be required. It is unlikely that property adjacent to the north, across Immokalee Road, will be developed with commercial uses. Traffic Questions were asked about the project's traffic generation. Mr. Trebilcock explained that the TIS calculates the traffic generated by the proposed development based on the highest and best use of 000 square feet of C-3 would result in a reduction in trips. Mr. Treb included in the TIS analysis. the site, which is 100, commercial uses. The proposed indoor self -storage ilcock went on to explain that background trips are Questions were asked regarding the design of the site, specifically the western interconnection and the indoor self -storage. Mr. Mulhere explained that the project allows for an interconnect to the west if the property is developed with non-residential uses. The proposed maximum building height is 40', which would allow for three stories. Outdoor storage is not permitted. The meeting concluded at approximately 6:00 PM. Page 2 of 2 H:\2023\2023025\WP\PUDZ\NIM\NIM Summary (8-15-2023).docx Published Daily Naples, FL 34110 50 ENCORE WAY #200 • Coordinatorvho on oath says that he or she is the Legal • the Naples Daily News, • • in Collier County, attached::Iorida; that the * of advertisement, :IUBLIC NOTICE, a published on • •licly acc ess ile website of Collier and Lee ■ Counties, newspaper r issues of, on. ;*hapter 50, Florida Statutes. Notary, Mato of VCII, County of gown My commission expires: �c�biication Ccst: � 1, 002. �6 Customer �©: 5�0 r'1 � :10 : PUBLIC N 018110E DISPLAY Aid 3X10 # of Affidavits: 1 his is not an invoice le pu"' ic is invited to aftend a neighborhood information meeting held by [joDerl j.0tTiLlinere, VAIL;[j. nior Vice President, and Jeremle Chastain, AICP, Planner III of Hole Montes, a Bowman Company, on ,.half of r. applicant at Estatesis currently r# Use District, ResidentialEstates Subdistrict, This is • request for r Small�Scale Growth Management Plan Amendment (SSGMPA) to create the Immokalee Randall Commercial ii to allow r maximum of 125,000i of gross floor Commercialarea of C�3 80,000 #feet of indoor air conditioned . Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zone *3 and *4 (E�ST/W�3 and E�ST/*4). This is a request to rezone the property to a Commercial Planned Unit Development P/ allow 0 ! square feet of gross floorarea Intermediate District uses including up to 80,000 square feet of indoor air conditioned self�storage, 1 1 t4Inge 21, GoillerpropproperTy is locateo aajacerif To s! mmokalee Road, approximately 773 feet west of the intersection of Immokalee Road and Randall oulevard, e technical difficulties will not be grounds to invalidate the meeting. If YOU Would like to participa a Zoom or view a video of the meeting, please email us at Neigh bo rh ood M eeti ng@hm en(j, com an oil e/1 1 1 1 •./ • 1 / 1 1 1 �' ! i . R obert J, Mulhere, FAICP, Senior Vice president NUIe Monies, a Bowman Company 47 ��SU encore way, Naples, �L. 341.E 0; Mahone: �39-2�4•�UUU, email: ho�rrtulherehmeng,cam a NAPLESNEWS.COM I FRiDAY, JULY 21, 2023 1 15A A trey issue fn the lawsuit (s what farmer 8roward Deputy Scat Peterson could hear during the Feb. 14, 2018, shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High ,ehoot in Parkland, Fla., in which 17 people died and 17 more were wounded with an AR-15-style rifle. GERALD HER®ERr/AP FILE A�SUCIAYED PRf:�S rtaFt"I' LAUi�GtiDALC, I'la. -- 7`lic rc- eri;ictmerit of a 2011; mass shootinf at a F lorlda high school will take place early next month as part of a civil lawsuit and will use live ammunition with a bullet safety device, a judge was told Thursday. Circuit .fudge Carol -Lisa Phillips en- ciarsed nn ,rafcrnent reached by cattor- r;ryS for victlriws' fRrnlli�, and former Fsrow and Deputy Scot Peterson to con duct th:? reenat1ment Aug. 4 at a threg- tory classrcKmi building at Marjory utoneman taouglas High School. A ballistics expert for the faimilies, fernier PBl agent Bruce Koenig, test)- ficd that live rounds matte a different sound than blanks, A key issue in the iaJ suit is what Peterson could hear during the shooting on Peb. 14, 2018, in wvhich 17 people died and 17 more were wounded with an AR-15-style rifle. "You want to imitate the situation as close as passible," Koenig said. Blanks, ht added, are "almesi as loud, but there definitely is a difference;' Peterson, the school's on-eampus deputy, was acquitted last month of criminal charges accusing him of inac' lion during the shooting, but the civil case against li'rrn that inakes slmilar ac� si; sai reen cirsat)ons is proceeding. Family atit►rnc y Davitl brill said tale live rounds would be fired into a ba)lis- ticbullet trap that is commonly used at f;Lui ranges and by law enforcement If to catch the ammunition safely, It is in fact perfectly safe and con- trolled," Brill said. Petersotis attorney, Michael Piper, d the agreement will mean only one actment rather than two as initia.- ))y iiroposa<l, An attorney for the Bro- warrd County school board also en- dorsed the plan. We think this Is than bent way to ap• pro ich It," Plpz!r said, " We don't want to part the community through thatsuite:' The building, left virtually un- touelied since the shooting, will be de- rnolished once the legal action is com- pleted, school officials said. The reen- actment would be based on school sur- w`eillance videos that show Si and -by -second the actions and to.* cations of Peterson and shooter Nikolas Cruz during the six; minute attack in wvhlch some 140 rounds were fired* Cruz, 24, a former Stoneman Doug,- lasstudent, received a life sentence last }year after his jury could not tuiiini- mously agree than lie deservcA the tieasth penalty. r �A ' fir Tor) n . j Some Rastrsc.•tkGns Apply New , �. Balanced rtar aNapl be v,o 8799 N, Taarniami Trail • Naples, Ft_ 34108 a ,x SW Corner Vanderbilt Beach Rd. & 41, Naar f iblix M•F 10.5 j Sat 10.4 l Sun 12.3 ( 239-596-8783 SHOP LOCAL Id5wCA Jill 4�N The public is Invited to attend a naightrorhood krtormation mwhng held by Robert J. Muttiairo, FA1CP, Senior Vice PraslCtent, , AICP, Planner III of Noie Mont, a bowman Company, on batiall of (tie apfrtk:ant at Nr following time and krca flow. Monday, August y, 2023 at 5:30 p.m. ColUer Caunty OF/iFAS Extonsion 147� l nmokalee Road, Multi -Purpose Room Naples, Ft. 34120 'ti;e tollov+ing rho noncurrent applicartivn have Veen made to Collier County Growth flianag€sment. 1. fmrnokalea? Randall Commercial Subdistrict (Pi.-2023W02480)The land ur2 des'�,nation t; currently E;�ate:> _ tv4lx�i tl� Oi�tricl, Re�dential E:;°ate Subdis4rict. Th15 is a r�6usst its a Small- ado Growth Management Plan Amendment tt6UMPA) to create the Ifnmokafa,�v Randall Commercial SLibdwWrt to allow a ni�roawium of 125 000 square feat d grans flovr area tri C-3 Commprckal intermediate Dis€rict Lrsrs Including up to 80,000 square rest of indoor air condeduned sell -storage and 2 Immakala;e Randall CPUD (Pt.-20230002458) The property is zoned E•Estates with We?Ifiefd Risk Management 5p�iai Trt��trrawat Overlay Zaana W3 and W4 (f-STIYV-3 and E ST�rY 4). T his !s a resquest to rexono the property to a Commercial Ptarir;ed Unit Development (CPUD) to allow a maximum of 125,000 square feet of gress floor area of G: 3 Commercial inlerm4late District uns s including up to 80,000 square fM of Indoor air conditioned self -storage, The subject property is comprised of three parcels totaling :t9.8S acres In sire and located In Section 27, Tovnasldp 48, flange 27, Collier County, Florida. The subja:`&t properly is bated at9�acent to and sauUt of immaka.k�; Road, approximately 773 feet wLpst at tite Intersection of immoltalear Read and F�ridall f3outevard; `��'`',rLSsti�f x Immotxale� ft�ndal( Cabrrgrn�r'cigi Sul�dtsirl�� ... , Irrii�rokailee Rands9f CPUD RLrslae�> acid property owners, rerldertts and visitors are welcome to attend the presentation and di�u.� Ure pro}mot with the applicant and Ctrilier County si�itf. loam is being provided as an option to !li,ose unable to attend ttie meeting in perssxi, However, if technical d+ihculltes arise witty Zvarn.. She technical difficullirx wig not be grounds to invalidate the meeting: It you would like to parlk;lpate via Ztom or view a vitro or the rmeting, please email us at MINIt}trr�Mgtttr>�s,jYTim nn M and we will send zoom Invite or a link of 11ie video, You may also email any comments or questions to j�_ I)l?011tL R tire) r 1qig0r1,�p1. Please reference Immokalee Randall SSGMPA & CPUD in st It ect line, Rob°rt J. htulhere, FAICt? Senior Vice Pre5ldent Mole Monier, a Bowman Company � 950 Encore Way, Naples, FL 34110, t'hone; 239-254-20tH), em& botrmuft;a:rt4hmeng rom s i • � � • � :� 1 1 ***��ease be aolv�seol*** The information on this sheet is to contact you regarding this project and future public meetings. Under Florida law, a -mail addresses, phone numbers and certain home addresses are public records once received by a government agency. If you do not want your a -mail address, phone number or home address released if the County receives a public records request, you can refrain from including such information on this sheet. You have the option of checking with the County staff on your own to obtain updates on the project as well as checking the County Web site for additional information. Name Address City, State Zip E-Mail Address � '(' ��k-�'�t21(tc�' - °� lQf ,�� � � (. � L 1 f" � �L, � S l�� �` a� ao ._ �, S � /1 o C - 0 /�f lrr � � 1 Zd � L � a I Urt ka d i � ec�-(�hl,c`nk , a. � .t � � � ***��ease be adv�sec�*** The information on this sheet is to contact you regarding this project and future public meetings. Under Florida law, a -mail addresses, phone numbers and certain home addresses are public records once received by a government agency. If you do not want your a -mail address, phone number or home address released if the County receives a public records request, you can refrain from including such information on this sheet. You have the option of checking with the County staff on your own to ®btain updates on the project as well as checking the County Vveb site for additional information. Name Address c�a��, state Zip E-Mail Address ti _ �� � � _ �-�:���sCo rr�, � � Qo(, r �- i�J `' - �� "F '-� � �,�' � � fit` J � -� .� � �2 �-' , �� � ■i■ HOLEMONTES a Bowman company July 21, 2023 Re: Immokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict Immokalee Randall CPUD (PL-20230002458) HM File No. 2023.025 Dear Property Owner: (PL -20230002460) Please be advised that Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, Senior Vice President, and Jeremie Chastain, AICP, Planner III of Hole Montes, a Bowman Company, on behalf of the applicant, have made the following two concurrent applications to Collier County Growth Management: 1. Immokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict (PL-20230002460) The land use designation is currently Estates —Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict. This is a request for aSmall-Scale Growth Management Plan Amendment (SSGMPA) to create the Immokalee Randall Commercial Subdistrict to allow a maximum of 125,000 square feet of gross floor area of G3 Commercial Intermediate District uses including up to 80,000 square feet of indoor air conditioned self -storage; and 2. Immokalee Randall CPUD (PL-20230002458) The property is zoned E-Estates with Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zone W-3 and W4 (E-ST/W-3 and E-ST/W4). This is a request to rezone the property to a Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) to allow a maximum of 125,000 square feet of gross floor area of C-3 Commercial Intermediate District uses including up to 80,000 square feet of indoor air conditioned self -storage. The subject property is comprised of three parcels totaling �9 Section 27, Township 48, Range 27, Collier County, Florida. adjacent to and south of Immokalee Road, approximately 773 Immokalee Road and Randall Boulevard. .86 acres in size and located in The subject property is located feet west of the intersection of In compliance with the Land Development Code requirements, a Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held to provide you an opportunity to hear a presentation about this petition and ask questions. The Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held on Monday, August 79 2023 at 5:30 p.m. at Collier County UF/IFAS Extension, 14700 Immokalee Road, Multi - Purpose Room, Naples, Florida 34120. Zoom is being provided as an option to those unable to attend the meeting in person. However, if technical difficulties arise with Zoom, the technical difficulties will not be grounds to invalidate the meeting. If you would like to participate via Zoom or view a video of the meeting, please email is at NeighborhoodMeetingghmeng com and we will send zoom invite or a link of the video. You may also email any comments or questions to NeighborhoodMeeting_ghmeng_com. Please reference Immokalee Randall SSGMPA & CPUD in subject line. 950 Encore Way, Naples, FL 34110 P: 239.254.2000 holemontes.com bowman.com H:\2023\2023025\WP\PUDZ\NIM\Property Owner Letter (7-21-2023).docx ■i■ HOLEMONTES a Bowman %company Very truly yours, HOLE MONTES, a BOWMAN COMPANY Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP Senior Vice President RJM/sek 950 Encore Way IWENaples, FL 34110 Phone: (239) 254-2000 HOLEMONTES a Sawrnan company Immokalee Randall commercial Subdistrict 950 Encore Way, Naples, FL 34110 P: 239.254.2000 holemontes.com I bowman.com H:\2023\2023025\WP\PUDZ\NIM\Property Owner Letter (7-2I-2023).docx I hereby certify that pursuant to Ordinance 2004-41, of the Collier County Land Development Code, I did cause the attached newspaper advertisement to appear and I did give notice by mail to the following property owners and/or condominium and civic associations whose members may be affected by the proposed land use changes of an application request for a rezoning, PUD amendment, or conditional use, at least 15 days prior to the scheduled Neighborhood Information Meeting. For the purposes of this requirement, the names and addresses of property owners shall be deemed those appearing on the latest tax rolls of Collier County and any other persons or entities who have made a formal request of the county to be notified. The said notice contained the laymen's description of the site property of proposed change and the date, time, and place of a Neighborhood Information Meeting. Per the attached letters, property owner's list, and copy of newspaper advertisement which are hereby made a part of this Affidavit of Compliance. (Signature of Applicant) STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing Affidavit of Compliance was acknowledged before me this 21 st da. of July 2023 by means of physical presence or online notarization, by Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, Senior Vice President of Hole Montes, a Bowman Compan to me Printed or who has produced as identification. who is personally known (Notary Seal) � � 1��✓� 1 ame of Notary STEPHANIE �tAROI Notary Public -State of FlOnda Commission � GG 96�839 My Comm, Expirrs Mar 9, 102� Bonded through Nations! Notiry ,+tSS�, H:\2023\2023025\WP\PUDZ\NIM\Affidavit of Compliance (7-21-2023).doc 1110 GGE LLC 1993 SCMMITT FAMILY TRUST 12543 COLLIERS RESERVE DR 735 MOLLY KNOLL CIR MAPLES, FL 34110---0 � LAS VEGAS, NV 89123---701 j 1 �. ,� 241 24TH AVE NE LAND TRUST � 26120TH AVE NE LLC C/O C LEE 6011 WESTPORT LANE � � 3526 SUNGARI CT � �� MAPLES, FL 34116---0 MAPLES, FL 34119---0 �, � '� i i � � 2859 BLOSSOM CT LAND TRUST 390 20TH AVE NW LLG i j 9468 FOXGLOVE LANE I, 6011 WETPORT LANE � MAPLES, FL 34120---0 �� MAPLES, FL 34116---0 � � � I, , � 707 MEYER DR ORANGETREE LLC '� 895 24TH AVE ANNEX LLC �� � 1673 SERRANO CIR 5621 WHISPERWOOD BLVD #901 � ' MAPLES, FL 34105---0 MAPLES, FL 34110---0 (, ACCI LIO, LESLI E 2175 WILSON BLVD N MAPLES, FL 34120---2576 ACKERMAN, KEVIN NELSON DEMISE RENNE ACKERMAN 3120 WILSON BLVD N MAPLES, FL 34120---1345 ADAN, SHIRLEY 1152NDSTSW MAPLES, FL 34120---0 ADVANCE INSPECTIONS & CONSULTANTS SERVICES LLC 6800 BIRD ROAD SUITE 196 MIAMI, FL 33155---0 AKHOUNDOV, DAMIR ' ANNE-LIESE HEINICHEN 25$0 WILSON BLVD M MAPLES, FL 34120---2347 ALBERTSON, LYNN SHIELA 1<EITH WILLIAM LENNOX 3327 PACIFIC DR MAPLES, FL 34119---0 ACEVEDO MUNIZ, GABRIEL & NUBIA 750 CHERRY BLOSSOM CT MAPLES, FL 34120---0 ADAMS JR, JAMES B &CHARLOTTE 713 MEYER DR MAPLES, FL 34120---0 ADAN,� SH I RLEY 1152NDSTSW MAPLES, FL 34120---0 i �� AGUILERA, JORGE A & CYNTHIA A 31342NDSTNE MAPLES, FL 34120---0 AKHUNDOV,TEYMUR 311 8TH ST N E MAPLES, FL 34120---0 ALFARO, EDUARDO 1141 24TH AVE NE MAPLES, FL 34120---0 221 18TH AVE NW MAPLES LLC 15275 COLLIER BLVD # 116 MAPLES, FL 34119---675Q 2850 RAN DALL LLC 2430 VANDERBILT BEACH RD #108-425 MAPLES, FL 34109---0 531 20TH AVE M E LLC 85 31ST ST SW MAPLES, FL 34117---0 895 24TH AVE ANNEX LLC 5621 WHISPERWOOD BLVD #901 MAPLES, FL 34110---0 ACEVEDO, ISRAEL NEREIDA ROSA 2410 8TH ST N E MAPLES, FL 34120---411 ADAMS, MARK C AMY ADAMS EM1LY RICHARDSON 27614TH ST NW MAPLES, FL 34120---0 ADKINS, ANDREW JASON & LOIDA 621 20TH AVE NE MAPLES, FL 34120---2383 AHDI, PRITPAL S 2750 I M LET COVE LN W MAPLES, FL 34120---7543 ALBERTS, JOSEPH M & ASHLEY 2872 ORANGE GROVE TRL MAPLES, FL 34120---0 ALFARO, EDUARDO & ADIANEZ 2662 2ND ST NW MAPLES, FL 34120---0 ACFONSO, ROBERT A & CCARA R 720 MEYER DR NAPLES, FL 34120---0 ACICIA CABAL REVOCABLE TRUST 1585 W 76TH ST HIACEAH, FL 33014---3314 ACCISON, JASON E & KIMBERLY C � 2892 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---0 ACVARADO, HERBERT ANTONIO MARIA ACVARADO 481 22ND AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---3370 ALVAREZ, ARTURO ALVAREZ MARIA DE JESUS ALVAREZ 221 20TH AVE N E NAPLES, FL 34120---0 ALVAREZ-FCI N N, ALLISON 29602NDSTNW i NAPLES, FL 34120---1395 ANSBRO, DENNIS EDWARD 600 22ND AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 ANTH IAS CCC 1917NE118THRD NORTH MIAMI, FL 33181---0 ,� AQUINO, GERARDO JIMENEZ KAREN LORENA VILCEGAS 5212 32ND AVE S W NAPLES, FL 34116---0 ARENDELLE, OCAF D 2687 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---0 �� i � i ALI ASSEF 2013 TRUST 2875 BLOSSOM CT NAPLES, FL 34120---7528 ALCEN, JACOB 880 22ND AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 ACPERT, CARRIE S ADAM SOHMER 252 74TH ST #D4 BROOKLYN, NY 11209---0 ALVAREZ, ACLISON M 29602NDSTNW NAPLES, FL 34120---1395 ALVAREZ, JUAN C & RITA 234 22ND AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 AMY L CUTTERS REV TRUST DANA NUZZO ACCAN D'AMATO 7234 E OAKRI DG E CI R LANTANA, FL 33462---0 ANSBRO, MICHAEL DAVID TERESA ANN ANSBRO 580 22ND AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 APPEANING, VLADIMIR TONI MANOGIN ZOYA APPEANING 12833 KING JAMES AVE BATON ROUGE, LA 70810---0 AQUINO, IVETT C 8628 S W 161 PLACE MIAMI, FL 33193---0 ARGUECLO, CLAUDIO &MARIA 2885 I N LET COVE LN W NAPLES, FL 34120---7569 �� -' _ . � i . � .; i l �� ACIA, CEONARD 110 22ND AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 ACCEN, MICHAEL SHANE CI N DSEY I<ATE ACCE N 2896 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---7513 ALTER, JULIANNE M 2897 I N LET COVE CN W NAPLES, FL 34120---7569 ALVAREZ, ALCISON M 2960 2ND ST NW NAPLES, FL 34120---1395 ALVAREZ, MARIANO 13939 SW 44 CN CI R #A MIAMI, FL 33175---4439 ANSARI, JOHN JOEL DONIELCE ASHCEY ANSARI 2733 INLET COVE LN W NAPLES, FL 34120---0 ANSELMi, REND & MICHECLE 2776 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---7526 APPLE, JOESPH M & MARY S 2832 I N LET COVE LANE W NAPLES, FL 34120---0 AQU I N O,J EAN N ETTE 8760 SW 42 N D ST MIAMI, FL 33165---0 ARIZMENDI, JUAN B 1091 24TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---5419 ARREDONDO, JOSE A GARCIA 670 22ND AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 ARTILES, ISMERY &RUBEN PO BOX 9722 TAVERNIER, FL 33070---0 ATEN, TIMOTHY & PEGGY 2742 I N LET COVE LAN E W EST NAPLES, FL 34120---0 AURORA 14 LLC ARQUATRINI LLC 2155 KHASIA PT NAPLES, FL 34119---0 AURORAI4 LLC 2155 I<HASIA PT NAPLES, FL 34119---0 AYALA, BEATRIZ M 3111 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---7516 BAKER, TRICIA A 705 MEYER DR NAPLES, FL 34120---1428 �' BANASI K, J OAN NA 402 DIVISION ST SOUTH AMBOY, NJ 08879---1933 i BARBER, WARREN D & JULENE J 2561 2ND ST NE NAPLES, FL 34120---4319 BARB, CHRISTOPHER T & TARA L 361 24TH AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34120---2387 (� i l ARROYO, EMANUEL & IVETTE 2833 AMBERWOOD LN NAPLES, FL 34120---7522 ARTILES, RUBEN &ISMERY 3060 4TH ST N E NAPLES, FL 34120---0 AULT, DANIEL G & DEBORAH D 3060 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---1448 AURORA 14 LLC ARQUATRINI LLC 2155 KHASIA PT NAPLES, FL 34119---0 AVALLONE, ENRlCO ADINA-VIVANNE AVALLONE 29414TH ST N E NAPLES, FL 34120---1338 B &J PROPERTIES LLC PO BOX 11398 CHANDLER, AZ 85248---0 BALDWIN, ROSE M 2312 S BRINK AVE SARASOTA, FL 34239---4207 BANKS, ELDON &HOLLY 2650 4TH ST NW NAPLES, FL 34120---1384 BARBOUR, ROY E & MINNIE L 681 HIGH HILL RD JACKSONVILLE, NC 28540---9673 BARREAT, GUSTAVO EDUARDO LINDA GONZALEZ 2660 CITRUS KEY LIME CT NAPLES, FL 34120---0 ARTILES, ISMERY &RUBEN PO BOX 9722 TAVERNIER, FL 33070---0 ASTAIZA, FLOR DELICIA VALENCIA 2393 ORCHARD ST NAPLES, FL 34120---0 AURORA 14 LLC ARQUATRINI LLC 2155 KHASIA PT NAPLES, FL 34119---0 AURORA 14 LLC ARQUATRINI LLC 2155 KHASIA PT NAPLES, FL 34119---0 AV I LA -VIGIL, LAZA RA T CLARIBEL C OLICHWIER 2251 GROVE DR NAPLES, FL 34120---7497 BAILEY, ROCIO CASTI N EI RA 2743 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---7527 BALINT, CRISTIAN 3644 COLLINS RD OAKLAND CHARTER, MI 48363---0 BAPTISTA JR, JEFFREY R JESSICA LYNN BAPTISTA 1760 WILSON BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120---2339 BARILE, CHRISTOPHER J CATHERINE VALENTINO 2238 VALENCIA LAKES CIR NAPLES, FL 34120---0 BARREIRO, FRANK D & MICHELLE L 751 CHERRY BLOSSOM CT NAPLES, FL 34120---1493 ARROYO, EMANUEL & IVETTE 2833 AMBERWOOD LN NAPLES, FL 34120---7522 ARTILES, RUBEN &ISMERY 3060 4TH ST N E NAPLES, FL 34120---0 AULT, DANIEL G & DEBORAH D 3060 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---1448 AURORA 14 LLC ARQUATRINI LLC 2155 KHASIA PT NAPLES, FL 34119---0 AVALLONE, ENRlCO ADINA-VIVANNE AVALLONE 29414TH ST N E NAPLES, FL 34120---1338 B &J PROPERTIES LLC PO BOX 11398 CHANDLER, AZ 85248---0 BALDWIN, ROSE M 2312 S BRINK AVE SARASOTA, FL 34239---4207 BANKS, ELDON &HOLLY 2650 4TH ST NW NAPLES, FL 34120---1384 BARBOUR, ROY E & MINNIE L 681 HIGH HILL RD JACKSONVILLE, NC 28540---9673 BARREAT, GUSTAVO EDUARDO LINDA GONZALEZ 2660 CITRUS KEY LIME CT NAPLES, FL 34120---0 ARTILES, ISMERY &RUBEN PO BOX 9722 TAVERNIER, FL 33070---0 ASTAIZA, FLOR DELICIA VALENCIA 2393 ORCHARD ST NAPLES, FL 34120---0 AURORA 14 LLC ARQUATRINI LLC 2155 KHASIA PT NAPLES, FL 34119---0 AURORA 14 LLC ARQUATRINI LLC 2155 KHASIA PT NAPLES, FL 34119---0 AV I LA -VIGIL, LAZA RA T CLARIBEL C OLICHWIER 2251 GROVE DR NAPLES, FL 34120---7497 BAILEY, ROCIO CASTI N EI RA 2743 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---7527 BALINT, CRISTIAN 3644 COLLINS RD OAKLAND CHARTER, MI 48363---0 BAPTISTA JR, JEFFREY R JESSICA LYNN BAPTISTA 1760 WILSON BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120---2339 BARILE, CHRISTOPHER J CATHERINE VALENTINO 2238 VALENCIA LAKES CIR NAPLES, FL 34120---0 BARREIRO, FRANK D & MICHELLE L 751 CHERRY BLOSSOM CT NAPLES, FL 34120---1493 BARRY FARBER REV LIV TRUST 15871 S W 12TH ST PEMBROKE PINES, FL 33027---p BARYON, GEORGE F 2030 8TH ST N E MAPLES, FL 34120---8402 BCF/NORTH COLLIER FIRE RESCUE 1885 VETERANS PARK DR MAPLES, FL 34120---1355 BCHD PARTNERS I LLC 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY ATTN: DAVIS GENSON MAPLES, FL 34105---0 BCHD PARTNERS I LLC 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY ATTN: DAVIS GENSON MAPLES, FL 34105---0 BEAUVAIS, BRIAN L 3561 13TH AVE SW MAPLES, FL 34117---5323 BEINGOLEA, PAUL E MILAGROS ALMESTAR 3180 VALENCIA DR �, MAPLES, FL 34120---0 BELLEY C HSlAO REV LIV TRUST 1075 SHADOWLAWN DR GREEN BROOK, NJ Q8812---0 BENLOLO, ALBERT RAQUEL BENLOLO � 3301 N E 183 ST #2009 AVENTURA, FL 33160---0 BERMUDEZ, EVARISTO & FELICIA 3028 SE 46 AVE OCALA, FL 34480---0 BARYON, GEORGE F BARYON, GEORGE F 2030 8TH ST N E 2030 8TH ST N E MAPLES, FL 34120---8402 MAPLES, FL 34120---8402 BARYON, GEORGE F BATES, DARREL A & PAMELA D 2030 8TH ST NE � 2177 RUSTY FIG CT ' MAPLES, FL 34120---8402 �'I MAPLES, FL 34120---7519 i i BCF/NORTH COLLIER FIRE RESCUE BCHD PARTNERS I LLC � 1885 VETERANS PARK DR � ', 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY � I MAPLES FL 34120---1355 � �� AWN: DAVIS GENSON i , MAPLES, FL 34105---0 i ' '� � �� � l ���� i BCHD PARTNERS I LLC � �� BCHD PARTNERS I LLC �� � 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY � 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY ATTN: DAVIS GENSON � ATTN: DAVIS GENSON ' MAPLES, FL 34105---0 ' MAPLES, FL 34105---0 �. ,�� � � ' �� ; BCHD PARTNERS I LLC ', � BCHD PARTNERS LLC 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY I 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY ATTN: DAVIS GENSON MAPLES, FL 34105---0 i MAPLES, FL 34105---0 I f i I � � BEEBE, I<ELLY PATRICK JOHNSON 3045 WILSON BLVD N MAPLES, FL 34120---0 BEKURTI, ELIDON ENKELEJDA SHEHAJ BEKURTI 90 22ND AVE NW ', MAPLES, FL 34120---0 BENAVIDES, ESTEBAN MARIA J BENAVIDES 231 22ND AVE NE MAPLES, FL 34120---2330 BENNETT, MICHAEL SAMANTHA BENNETT 2804 AMBERWOOD LN MAPLES, FL 34120---7521 BERNIER, RICHARD & HIEN 981 24TH AVE NE MAPLES, FL 34120---0 i BEEBE, TI MOTHY 245 22ND AVE NE MAPLES, FL 34120---2330 BELLANDE, MELISSA 2580 4TH ST N W MAPLES, FL 34120---1312 BENITEZ, NEISY HIRALDO ALFONSO 2140 8TH ST N E MAPLES, FL 34120---0 BENOIT, ROGER M & JOYCE A 2868 ORANGE GROVE TRL MAPLES, FL 34120---7513 BERNSTEIN, MATTHEW R LAURA YANETH MADRID RINCON 490 20TH AVE NE MAPLES, FL 34120---0 BEEBE, TI MOTHY 245 22ND AVE NE MAPLES, FL 34120---2330 BELLANDE, MELISSA 2580 4TH ST N W MAPLES, FL 34120---1312 BENITEZ, NEISY HIRALDO ALFONSO 2140 8TH ST N E MAPLES, FL 34120---0 BENOIT, ROGER M & JOYCE A 2868 ORANGE GROVE TRL MAPLES, FL 34120---7513 BERNSTEIN, MATTHEW R LAURA YANETH MADRID RINCON 490 20TH AVE NE MAPLES, FL 34120---0 BERRIOS, ROSEMARY ROBERT CLARKE 731 18TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34117---0 BETANCUR, TANIA MIRELLA LOPES HARRY ZUNIGA 2665 FISHTAIL PALM CT NAPLES, FL 34120---7567 BIJOU, FEDOD 2389 6TH ST NW NAPLES, FL 34120---0 BIRD, LORNA R MICHAEL N CALLEN 910 RAN DALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120---0 BLEY, SHANNON KATHRYN STEPHANIE BLEY 28214TH ST N E NAPLES, FL 34120---0 BLUME, STEPHEN & MILAGROS 2820 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 BOKRAND, WALDEMAR 0 HENRIETTE M BOKRAND 215 KIRTLAND DR NAPLES, FL 34110---1347 ,, ,' BOLLT TR, ROBERTO ORANGETREE ASSOCIATES PO BOX 855 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34133---0 BOLLTTR, ROBERTO ORANGETREE ASSOCIATES PO BOX 855 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34133---0 BOLLT TR, ROBERTO ORANGETREE ASSOCIATES PO BOX 855 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34133---0 i BERTRAM, RAYMOND A 3804 ROCKY FORD DR AUSTI N, TX 78749---6942 BETTINI, SHARON A 704 MEYER DR NAPLES, FL 34120---0 BILLS, RANDY W 911 22ND AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---3414 BITTING, ANDREW V & GLADYS J 741 CHERRY BLOSSOM CT NAPLES, FL 34120---1493 BLOEMKER, WESLEY A & SUZANNE S 2237 VALENCIA LAKES CIR NAPLES, FL 34120---0 B0, BRYAN & BRITTNEY 2887 BLOSSOM CT NAPLES, FL 34120---7528 BOLLT TR, ROBERTO ORANGETREE ASSOCIATES PO BOX 855 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34133---0 BOLLT TR, ROBERTO ORANGETREE ASSOCIATES PO BOX 855 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34133---0 BOLLT TR, ROBERTO ORANGETREE ASSOCIATES PO BOX 855 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34133---Q BOLLT TR, ROBERTO LAND AGREEMENT TRUST UTD 1/27/86 AND 6/26/96 ORANGETREE ASSOCIATES PO BOX 855 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34133---0 ii BEST, ROBERT P 2811 2ND ST NE NAPLES, FL 34120---1848 BHADRA, PRITHVIRAJ INDRANI DATTA 36 ROSEVILLE RD WESTPORT, CT 06880---4507 BILLS, RANDY W 911 22ND AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---3414 BITZEL, JULIA A 2620 WILSON BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120---0 BLOMBERG, NICHOLE DAVID ERNEST BRYANT 471 18TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 BOCQUE, SOFIE MARIA GERDA RENE LEYVA PONCE DE LEON 25814TH ST NW NAPLES, FL 34120---0 BOLLT TR, ROBERTO ORANGETREE ASSOCIATES PO BOX 855 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34133---0 BOLLT TR, ROBERTO ORANGETREE ASSOCIATES PO BOX 855 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34133---0 BOLLT TR, ROBERTO ORANGETREE ASSOCIATES PO BOX 855 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34133---0 BOLLT TR, ROBERTO LAND TRUST UTD 1/27/86 ANA AMENDED 6/26/96 ORANGETREE ASSOCIATES PO BOX 855 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34133---0 BOODH00, KAMIE & ODITNARAIN 50 24TH AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34120---6325 BOSTWICK, JONATHAN K DONNA C BOSTWICI< 2185 RUSTY FIG CT NAPLES, FL 34120---0 BRADY, JOHN & MARGARET 2425 2ND ST N W NAPLES, FL 34120---4324 I BRIGHT INVESTMENTS J & I< LLC 275 WEST 68TH ST APT #101 HIALEAH, FL 33014---0 BRODERS, ELLIOT SCOTT HEATHER RENEE BRODERS 678 24TH AVE N E NAPLES, FL 34120---0 BROWN, WILLIAM JASON TAMARA LEE BROWN 2738 INLET COVE LN W NAPLES, FL 34120---0 BURBAGE,JOHN C&SUSAN M � 621 18TH AVE N E i I NAPLES, FL 34120---6300 BURNS, GERALD W � CHERYL A UMLAND-BURNS 627 SUNCREST DR SHERRARD, IL 61281---0 i BUSHONG, MARKS & KATHY � �, 2523 4TH ST N W NAPLES, FL 34120---0 i BOOHER, RANDY L & AUDREY J 2849 I N LET COVE LN W NAPLES, FL 34120---7569 BOTTI, FRANK 320 20TH AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34120---6323 BRAUNSTEIN, SCOTT A & BRENDA L 2927 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---7450 BRIGHT, JASON & CHRISTINA 160 22ND AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34120---0 BRODERSEN, PATRICIA A 310 24TH AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34120---2387 BRUNER, DAVID & NIKKI L 231 1$TH AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34120---2354 BURGER, MARK JON ANILEDIF AYALA NIEBLA 2243 GROVE DR NAPLES, FL 34120---7497 BURR, DAVID 2758 I N LET COVE LN W NAPLES, FL 34120---7543 BUTZ,TERRYR 2555 MARQUESA ROYALE LANE #301 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 ..; BOSCH, IRMINA GUADALUPE YESENIA PASTOR 2683 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---0 BOUZO, ORLANDO & MARIA 3170 VALENCIA DR NAPLES, FL 34120---1400 BRETT TR, DANIEL JOSEPH DEBRA LYNN BRETT TR DANIEL J BRETT 2004 REV TRUST DEBRA L BRETT 2004 REV TRUST 690 24TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 BROCCOLO, THOMAS GERARD GAY LYNN BROCCOLO 31102NDSTNE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 BROWN, GARETH & JANEL 8 N AHWAHNEE LAKE FOREST, I L 60045---0 BUONGIORNO, RENEE 2860 2ND ST NE NAPLES, FL 34120---1832 BURGOS, JORGE R & MICHELLE A 261 18TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---6332 BURTON, STACEE 241 18TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---4363 � B UTZ, TERRY R LORI JEAN LOYD ; 2842 WILSON BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120---0 CABALLERO, JUAN A DOCE � CABAN, EVELYN CACERAS, JORGE 1841 WILSON BLVD N i , 521 24TH AVE NE YAMIRKA SUYI NAPLES, FL 34120---2342 � NAPLES, FL 34120---2362 � !,, 121 20TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 CADIEU, KENT D & OLGA 2882 CINNAMON BAY CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34119---0 CAMBRIA, JAKE NICHOLAS 209 JUNG BLVD E NAPLES, FL 34120---0 CANCINO, JULIO C & MARIA J � 2723 ORANGE GROVE TRL � NAPLES, FL 34120---7527 CANNAM, CHARLES G 530 22ND AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34120---0 CAPLAN, RONALD & LISA A 80 25TH AVE N E NAPLES, FL 34120---1387 CARBALLO, JORGE R 11651 SW 28TH ST j MIAMI, FL 33165---2144 �� CARDONA, MARILYN & EVEYLN ' 2644 CITRUS KEY LIME CT i NAPLES, FL 34120---0 CARRANZA, GUSTAVO A 2719 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---7527 ,� CARUFE, ANNAMARIA 15056 SAVANNAH DR NAPLES, FL 34119---0 � GASTANEDA, ANA R S504 ISLANDWALK CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34119---0 CALABRESE, JASON V & REBECCA F 1008 CHESAPEAK BAY CT NAPLES, FL 34120---0 CAMMUSO, P MATTHEW 691 22ND AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---2764 CANDELARIAJR, ORESTES 2275 GROVE DR NAPLES, FL 34120---7497 CANNELLA JR, FRANI< JENNIFER L DOMINGUEZ 3020 WILSON BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120---0 CAPRIROLO, ALFREDO ALEJANDRA CAPRIROLO 2920 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---0 ,_ CARDENAS, ASHLEY 234 22ND AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 i � i CARLOS M FERNANDEZ & I< P RUDCHENCO REV LIV TRUST 2782 6TH ST NW NAPLES, FL 34120---0 CARRASCO, BLANCO 2680 4TH ST N W NAPLES, FL 34120---1384 CASALE, RICHARD $ ROSE M FRANCO EST 2166 RUSTY FIG CT NAPLES, FL 34120---7519 CASTRO, ANTONIO JORGE YAREMIS SERRANO 61524THAVENE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 i -. w ` I ;I , i CALLEJAS, JOSE E & SONIA M 130 22ND AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34120---3306 CAMAS, ANDREW CARLOS 1861 WILSON BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120---0 CANN, DAVID G & NANCI A 371 18TH AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34120---2326 CANOED, BETH 2400 6TH ST N W NAPLES, FL 34120---1365 CARANDANG, JESUS C &MARIA R 2922 INLET COVE LN E NAPLES, FL 34120---7507 CARDENAS, GEORGE & SARAH 580 24TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 CARMELINA RIVERA REV TRUST 3160 VALENCIA DR NAPLES, FL 34120---1400 CARROLL III, JEREMIAH J LAUREN ANN CARROLL 2865 INLET COVE LN W NAPLES, FL 34120---0 CASANOVA, RONALD J MARIA DE LOS A CASANOVE 2732 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---7563 CASTROVINCI, CLAUDIA 2215 GROVE DR NAPLES, FL 34120---7497 CCR FAMILY PROPERTIES LLC 5147 CASTELLO DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34103---0 CHALLA, SAMMI R & UDAYASREE 10451 CORKSCREW COMMONS DR #104 ESTERO, FL 33928---0 CHAMBERS, JANET 1961 8TH ST NE NAPLES, FL 34120---3400 CHAPMAN, WESLEY D & JESSICA 2647 ORANGE GROVE TRAIL NAPLES, FL 34120---0 CHEN, YUNMIN IRENE LINGLING YE 2781 INLET COVE LN W NAPLES, FL 34120---0 CHICO, DOSE 27432NDSTNW NAPLES, FL 34120---0 CINTRON REVOCABLE TRUST 440 20TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---2599 CIPRIANO, MICHAEL W 2630 4TH ST NW NAPLES, FL 34120---0 CLAREY, RICHARD MICHAEL 2852 BLOSSOM COURT NAPLES, FL 34120---0 CLEARY, MICHAEL & DEANNA 2798 I N LET COVE LN W NAPLES, FL 34120---7543 i �I CELESTIN, THESSIA CHAKKALAKKAL, JOMON & DEEPA 2230 WILSON BLVD N 14656 BEAUFORT CIR NAPLES, FL 34120---3344 NAPLES, FL 34119---Q CHAMBERS FAMILY TRUST 1961 8TH ST NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 CHAMBERS, WILLIAM L & JULIE A 1881 8TH ST NE NAPLES, FL 34120---3462 CHAVEZ, FERNANDO 218 22ND AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---2329 CHEREZ, HUGO PATRICIO GARRIDO FANNY REBECA DEGARRIDO 2739 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---7527 CHOW-QUAN, FARRAH & JASON 2652 CITRUS KEY LIME CT NAPLES, FL 34120---7565 CINTRON, GEORGE & DEBBI 2796 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---0 CITRUS GREENS AT ORANGETREE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION 1NC 1130 GROVE DR NAPLES, FL 34120---1425 CLARK, LAWRENCE E BERNADETTE M CLARI< 2860 BLOSSOM CT NAPLES, FL 34120---7528 CLEMMENSEN, DEREK A & STACY 2763 ORANGE GROVE TRAIL NAPLES, FL 34120---0 CHAMBERS, GLORIA LEE 2805 AMBERWOOD LN NAPLES, FL 34120---Q CHAMPERU PROPERTIES LLC 26386 CLARKSTON DR BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135---0 CHAZULLE, M MARGARITA 731 CHERRY BLOSSOM CT NAPLES, FL 34120---1493 CHERIAN, ROY & GLQRIA MATHEW 2260 8TH ST NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 CIFUENTES, JULIANA 2803 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---7525 CIOFFI, SALVATORE & LUISA 1664 65TH STREET BROOKLYN, NY 11204---0 CIUS, JOHN EDDY & SINNEDY 292 24TH AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34120---0 CLAYRE M GIL REV LIV TRUST 13265 SW 9TH TER MIAMI, FL 33184---1932 CLEMONS, BILLY J &DONNA L 530 18TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---2327 CLEVER, SARAN E 280 20TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 COEN, DOUGLAS M & KATHLEEN 2211 GROVE DR NAPLES, FL 34120---0 COGSWELL, KICKY L &STELLA 2790 2ND ST N E NAPLES, FL 34120---1328 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT � 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 I NAPLES, FL 34112---0 ;� COLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S NAPLES, FL 34104---0 COLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S NAPLES, FL 34104---0 COLLIER HEALTH SERVICES INC 1454 MADISON AVE W IMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 COLOSIMO, JOSEPH R & MELISSA R 2928 4TH ST NW NAPLES, FL 34120---0 CONNOR, REED T BAILEY R CONNOR �! KASEY M CONNOR 3327 PALOMINO SPRINGS BAN D ERA, TX 78003---0 CONTRERAS, RODOLFO ORTIZ 2861 INLET COVE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 �i CLUSIA LAN D TRUST 449 WILLET AVENUE NAPLES, FL 34108---0 COFFMAN II, NORMAN W PATRICIA A COFFMAN 29412ND ST NE NAPLES, FL 34120---4772 COLLIER CNTY %REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 335 TAM IAM I TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 COLLIER CNTY COMMISSIONERS WATER -SEWER 3339 TAMIAMI TRL EAST STE 301 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 COLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S NAPLES, FL 34104---0 COLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S NAPLES, FL 34104---4961 COLOSIMO FAMILY TRUST 2928 4TH ST NW NAPLES, FL 34120---0 CONDORI, FRANKLIN & HAYDEE 4560 15TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116---5140 CONTI, JOHN R 3021 WILSON BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120---0 COPANIC, SHEILA M 3080 2ND ST NW NAPLES, FL 34120---1349 i i �� i �� COCHUVELLA REV TRUST 2233 VALENCIA LAKES CIR NAPLES, FL 34120---7499 COGSWELL, KICKY L &STELLA 2790 2ND ST NE NAPLES, FL 34120---1328 COLLIER CNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 3301 TAMIAMI TRL E NAPLES, FL 34112---4961 COLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S NAPLES, FL 34104---0 COLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S NAPLES, FL 34104---0 COLLIER COUNTY 3299 TAMIAMI TRAIL E OFFICE OF COUNTY ATTORNEY SUITE 800 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 COLOSIMO, ASHLEY N DANIEL L LINDSEY 2984 4TH ST NW NAPLES, FL 34120---0 CONNERLEY, LUKAS M JENNIFER M CONNERLEY 2998 WILSON BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120---2577 CONTRERAS, CARLOS & LILIANA 7859 BUCI<S RUN DR NAPLES, FL 34120---3904 COPELAND, DEBORAH LYNN 1101 31 ST ST S W NAPLES, FL 34117---4249 COPELAND, JOHN B & ALICIA ROSE 560 24TH AVE NW MAPLES, FL 34120---3366 COTTR E LL, KASSO N D RA E 5147 CASTELLO DRIVE MAPLES, FL 34120---0 COX, ROBERT SHAME &MARIA C 2371 8TH ST N E MAPLES, FL 34120---3488 CRAIG, KATE R & CHAD S 2667 ORANGE GROVE TRL MAPLES, FL 34120---0 CROSS, KENNETH P & LETICIA 2184 RUSTY FIG COURT MAPLES, FL 34120---0 CRUZ, GREGORIO 17118THAVENE MAPLES, FL 34120---6315 CS I<UMAR FAMILY TRUST 2202 GROVE DR MAPLES, FL 34120---0 CUMMIMGS, FRANK E & NORMA C 1980 8TH ST N E MAPLES, FL 34120---3479 CUNNINGHAM, JONATHAN E 5850 SUNCREST DR PINECREST, FL 33156---0 CURTISS INTERNATIONAL lNC 2905 I N LET COVE LN W MAPLES, FL 34120---0 CORTINA, AILIN MAYKEL ESPINOSA 1019 20TH AVE NE MAPLES, FL 34120---0 COURAGEUX, MARLINE TANIS ALIX COURAGE�JX 2759 ORANGE GROVE TRAIL MAPLES, FL 34120---0 COX, ROBERT SHAKE &MARIA C 23718TH ST N E MAPLES, FL 34120---3488 CRENSHAW, JAMES M & AMANDA R 430 18TH AVE NE MAPLES, FL 34120---0 CROSSAN, CHRISTOPHER L JENNIFER L CROSSAN 321 18TH AVE NE MAPLES, FL 34120---0 CRUZ, JUANA MARLENE 2809 I N LET COVE LN W MAPLES, FL 34120---7569 CSMA FT LLC 1850 PARKWAY PL #900 MARL ETTA, GA 30067---8261 CUNNINGHAM, EMROM &STACEY 2430 8TH ST N E MAPLES, FL 34120---0 CURCIO, NICI<OLAS R 2805 I N LET COVE LANE W MAPLES, FL 34120---0 CUSTODIO, AUGUSTO R MELANIE S CUSTODIO 2562 4TH ST NW MAPLES, FL 34120---0 i � �� I� COTTRELL, BENJAMIN J DEBORAH L COTTRELL 28614TH ST NW MAPLES, FL 34120---0 COWLEY, ROBERT 14903 S GALLATIN BLVD BROOK PARK, OM 44142---2446 CRAFT, ALECIA S 2772 ORANGE GROVE TRL MAPLES, FL 34120---7526 CREVIER, KATHERINE ROBERT C CREVIER SR 391 24TH AVE NW MAPLES, FL 34120---2387 CRUZ, CHRISTIAN DAVID 2891 ORANGE GROVE TRL MAPLES, FL 34120---0 CRUZ, LUIS ALBERTO 191 20TH AVE N E MAPLES, FL 34120---2318 CSONKA, SANDRA C 440 20TH AVE N W MAPLES, FL 34120---2377 CUNNINGHAM, EMRON $c STACEY 2430 8TH ST N E MAPLES, FL 34120---411 CURRAN, CHRISTOPHER S AUDREY CURRAN 2590 2ND STREET NW MAPLES, FL 34120---0 CUSTODIO, AUGUSTO R MELANIE SANTOS CUSTODIO 2562 4TH ST NW MAPLES, FL 34120---0 CVS HEALTH CORPORATION ATLUS GROUP US INC PO BOX 1610 COCKEYSVILLE, MD 21030---0 i DANIEL J05EPH BRETT REV TRUST DEBRA LYNN BRETT REV TRUST 690 24TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 DAVIGNON, MARC W KATHERINA AVELLANEDA 2745 I N LET COVE LN W NAPLES, FL 34120---7548 DAVIS, TIMOTHY B JAYMA E MORGAN 120 18TH AVE N E NAPLES, FL 34120---6314 DE SILVA, ABEL JEREMIAS MONIZ DAYAN RIASCOS LASPRILLA 40905PRING LN UNITE BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134---0 DECORO, JONATHAN G & MARIA E V TRL 2724 ORANGE GRO E NAPLES, FL 34120---0 DEL TORO, GILBERT & ZAMIRA ODE 511 18TH AVE N E NAPLES, FL 34120---2328 DENTON, ALAN L & CATHY A 263 25TH AVE N E NAPLES, FL 34120----1360 pERA, ROBINSON & ELIDIANE NAICHA BEAUPLAN j 2793 AMBERWOOD CT NAPLES, FL 34120---0 DIANE LSWICK REV LIVTRUST 2179 GROVE DR NAPLES, FL 34120---7517 i D'ANDREA, JAMES FRANCIS 2884 2 N D ST N E NAPLES, FL 34120---0 DANIEL, ALFRED W REBECCA DANIEL 287 NAGLE ST BOUND BROOK, NJ 08805---0 DAVILA, FEDERICO & LIDIA R 539 OCEAN AVE UNION BEACH, NJ 07735---3119 DE LEON, CHRISTY 510 22ND AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---3304 DEATER, SAMANTHA JO PARISH MATTHEW DOUGLAS DEATER 373 24TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 DEERING, MARK D &JESSICA 181 20TH AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34120---2385 DELGADO, JORGE LUIS GARCIA 30222NDSTNW NAPLES, FL 34120---0 DENTON, SALENA K 30102NDSTNE NAPLES, FL 34120---1332 DESIR, ANDERSON JIMS HERALD FRANZESKA DESIR 963 20TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 DIAZ, CHRISTOPHER PAUL RACHEL DIAZ 581 22ND AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34120---2324 i _� _ ��� � DANG, JAMMED & MAI 1940 8TH ST N E NAPLES, FL 34120---3479 DARTS, ISMENE 2923 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---7450 DAVIS, SHIRLEY 633 LAM BTO N LN NAPLES, FL 34104---0 DE QUESADA, DIALIS R 2916 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---0 DEBROSSE, GI�ERDELINE S JEAN E_& ILTANIE B SAINVAL 2713 I N LET COVE LN W NAPLES, FL 34120---0 DEL CARMEN FRIAR, MARIA RONALD ARTHUR FRIAR 2894 I N LET COVE LANE W NAPLES, FL 34120---0 DELTORO, DULCE 391 18TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---6330 DENTON, STACEY LYNN JESSICA LAYNE SETf�LE 1114 ADELINE AVE LEHIGH ACRES, FL 33971---0 DEVLIN, JOHN J & VALENTINA 2645 CITRUS KEY LIME CT NAPLES, FL 34120---0 DIAZ, LUCY DANNY GONZALEZ-LAUZAN JESUS ESTRADA 3929 SW 60TH AVE MIAMI, FL 33155---5016 D I LS, P 711 MEYER DR NAPLES, FL 34120---1428 DISQUE SR, DARRELL & NATALIE 2198 GROVE DR NAPLES, FL 34120---0 DOMINGUEZ, EDUARDO VIVIAN LILIA DOMINGUEZ 2860 2ND ST NW NAPLES, FL 34120---0 DOMONTE, EDWARD & LAURA A 3171 VALENCIA DR NAPLES, FL 34120---0 DONIS, WALTER A LUIS A BARRERA OLIVARES 1080 24TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 DONOSO, TERESA P SALAME 2813 INLET COVE LN W NAPLES, FL 34120---0 DOSSOU, RONALD 191 24TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 DUDASH, WAYNE & ROBERTA 361 20TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---2320 DUPREE, JOEY L APRIL D MARTINEZ 108 20TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL. 34120---0 D UTTO N, R EVA A 2282 GROVE DR NAPLES, FL 34120---7496 i DIPASQUALE, MICHELE 3000 ORANGE GROVE TRAIL NAPLES, FL 34120---0 DIXON, PASCALE 2730 I N LET COVE LN NAPLES, FL 34120---0 DOMINGUEZ, JAIRO & GRACILIANA 12367 SW 194TH ST MIAMI, FL 33177---6528 DOMES, PEDRO &ADELAIDA 174 MYRTLE AVE BUFFALO, NY 14204---2060 DONNA M SPINO & JUDITH GUENTHER JT/LIV/TRUST 6663 BONETA RD MEDINA, OH 44256---9770 DORLEUS, JEAN GARY ELISABETH PIERRE LOUIS 1970 8TH ST N E NAPLES, FL 34120---0 DREYER TRUST 19 GALA DRIVE NEWBURGH, NY 12550---0 DUNCAN SR, THOMAS W & JANET M 161 18TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---6315 DURNING, MICHAEL THOMAS i 470 22ND AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 DIRAMACCA, JAMES K & KAREN L ISOBEL M DEMARS 2857 I N LET COVE LN W NAPLES, FL 34120---7569 DOAN, DANH i HANG T NGI�YEN '� 55 LITTLETON RD UNIT 10B j AYER, MA 01432---1779 EAST END MGMT 2 LLC i 2733 TIBURON BLVD E . , I # 102 �� . � �'� �. NAPLES, FL 34109---0 � �, DOMINICI<, AJITH ELIZABETH S AJITHKUMAR 3822 1ST AVENUE SW NAPLES, FL 34117---0 DOMES, PEDRO &ADELAIDA 174 MYRTLE AVE BUFFALO, NY 14204---2060 DONNELLY, JOSEPH E 580 20TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---2539 DORMEUS, FLAVENOR MARIE LOURDES ALEXANDRE 920 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120---0 DUARTE, ADIELA $c HERNANDO 2965 ORANGE GROVE TRAIL NAPLES, FL 34120---0 DUNCAN, AGNES B 2660 WILSON BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120---3302 DURYEA, GLENN R IRENE DURYEA 2660 FISHTAIL PALM CT NAPLES, FL 34120---0 ECKSTEIN, RICHARD M ANNA V ECKSTEIN 2541 8TH ST N E NAPLES, FL 34120---4499 f EDEN, KARINA KARINA MANCUSCO 2932 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---7494 ELENA MOREIRAS REVOCABLE TRUST 5460 SW 188 AV E SW RANCHES, FL 33332---0 ELMORE, EDWARD LEE TERESAJEWELELMORE 2194 GROVE DR NAPLES, FL 34120---7515 I i ; i� �� ! ��, EDWARDS, BARRINGTON-& MERVIS 420 18TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---6308 ELLISON, CHRIS A & LORI E .�.'�:'- . ;•'. , � I 2727 ORANGE GROVE TRL t`�:�: •. `= � � . ,.; .. i NAPLES, FL 34120---7527 � ;�;,:��'r .� :�.: . ! ..�ti�� �� • ,�. . ,� �. ELTON G SMITH & DOLORES JOANN , �, �� SMITH REV TRUST ' . 2278 GROVE DR NAPLES, FL 34120---7496 � � � � �, EEO CONSTRUCTION INC 3569 5TH AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34120---0 ELMEUS, KATHLEEN & RENEL 2921 I N LET COVE LN E NAPLES, FL 34120---0 ENRIQUEZ, DANILO ESTHER PEREZ 210 16TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 � �� � � ENT, GERALD B &BETTY LOU ; EPPERSON, NATALIE & ROBERT W ERNST, BRANDON & GENNY 2936 ORANGE GROVE TRL 260 20TH AVE NW ; 1030 22ND AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---7494 NAPLES, FL 34120---2375 � � NAPLES, FL 34120---0 '� ERVIN, DAVID J & MARIA i � ESCALANTE, BEKER •�.�• .'i ESCALONA, ARNOLDO .. 2903 ORANGE GROVE TRL � � I<AITHLYN PEREZ � I<ELLY V OSORIO NAPLES, FL 34120---7509 � 545 15TH ST NW .::. � 2792 ORANGE GROVE TRAIL NAPLES, FL 34120---0 � � � NAPLES, FL 34120---0 . �� � ��� _ _ _ _ _. -- - - - - -- ---- � ESPANA, RAFAEL EDUARDO HERRERA � ,� ESPINEL, JOHANA VASQUEZ �'� � �� Y ESPINOSA, MAIKEL ISABEL CRISTINE PARES FACENDA � ADHEMIR EDSON DIONISIO � AILIN CORTINA .., i 220 18TH AVE NW 1867 WILSON BLVD N �� ��� ���.� + �� 1019 20TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 � NAPLES, FL 34120---0 � NAPLES, FL 34120---0 '� - - ESPINOSA, RUBEN � ESPINOZA, GONZALO ESTEVEZ, IRIS � BLANCA Z NARANJO � JEIDDY M OTERO 1831 WILSON BLVD N 151 25TH AVE NW 2173 RUSTY F1G CT NAPLES, FL 34120---2342 NAPLES, FL 34120---0 NAPLES, FL 34120---0 � � � l ESTRADA, FABIAN & VANESSA � ESTRADA, LEONEL T � `� i ESTRADA, LEONEL T 2960 ORANGE GROVE TRL 2651 2ND ST NE 2661 2ND ST NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 � NAPLES, FL 34120---0 NAPLES, FL 34120---0 •t r ESTRADA, RAUL & LISA A `� ETTLEMAN, EARL I< & LISA A �. � �� � EVANS III, CLARK �! � 2310 WILSON BLVD N � 1 BR11-i'ANY LENGACHER 2911 ORANGE GROVE TRL � . j NAPLES, FL 34120---7450 i NAPLES, FL 34120---0 i 2904 INLET COVE LN W � � � NAPLES, FL 34120---0 EVANS, DENNIS R � ; EVANS, EDWARD L & PATRICIA A FAAS, STEVEN J 2944 ORANGE GROVE TRAIL � j 441 24TH AVE NE � JANICE M FAAS NAPLES, FL 34120---7494 � i NAPLES, FL 34120---0 ' RACHAEL MIESEMER � . 2830 4TH ST NW NAPLES, FL 34120---0 FALCO, MARIO & MARY B 24531 WOODSAGE DR BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134---0 FELIX, YOLENMY 2809 AMBERWOOD LN MAPLES, FL 34120---0 FERNANDEZ, HILDA & ALBERTO J 641 24TH AVE NE MAPLES, FL 34120---0 FIGUEROA, ANAMARIA DAVID FIGUEROA JR 2814 I N LET COVE LM W MAPLES, FL 34120---7559 FIORITTO JR, EUGENE B KATHERINE B FIORITTO 2818 ORANGE GROVE�TRL MAPLES, FL 34120---0 i �� FAMEUX, TONIA 2840 INLET COVE LN W MAPLES, FL 34120---0 FERNANDEZ, ARNOLDO BOU SANDRA CUESTA TENENBAUM 250 GRAND CANAL DR MIAMI, FL 33144---0 . FERNANDEZ, NESTOR & DOROTHY L 2948 ORANGE GROVE TRL MAPLES, FL 34120-�-0 FINMERTY, MARGARET 2884 ORANGE GROVE TRL MAPLES, FL 34120---0 FLA POWER &LIGHT COMPANY PROPERTY TAX-PSX/JB 700 UNIVERSE BLVD JUNO BEACH, FL 33408---2657 FLEMING, LANCE & TAMI FLETCHER, KEVIN GRANT 3040 OIL WELL ROAD � 2751 ORANGE GROVE TRL MAPLES, FL 34120---0 � MAPLES, FL 34120---0 FLICK BISHOP, NANCY M 1 i � FLORES JR, FERNANDO I! LEROY F BISHOP IV I ADRIANA FLORES i ' 2707 ORANGE GROVE TRL 182 22ND AVE NE MAPLES, FL 34120---0 I MAPLES, FL 34120---0 FORD, VIVIAN E 2620 4TH ST NW MAPLES, FL 34120---1384 FOUCH, E DWAIM & DARLA j 2281 WILSON BLVD N MAPLES, FL 34120---2346 FRANCISCO TAVARES FIGUEIREDO & MARIA MUMIZ TAVARES LIV TRUST 2883 BLOSSOM CT MAPLES, FL 34120---0 FORGACIU, ALIN CIPRIAN DANIELA VIORICA FORGACIU 2178 GROVE DR MAPLES, FL 34120---7515 FOX, CAROLYM J 1821 8TH ST N E MAPLES, FL 34120---3462 FRANCISCO, JEFFREY 3563 79TH ST APT 2E JACKSON HEIGHTS, NY 11372---4841 i i i i ,. , FBNLAND LLC 2055 TRADE CENTER WAY MAPLES, FL 34109---0 FERNANDEZ, ARNOLDO BOU SANDRA CUESTA TENENBAUM 250 GRAND CANAL DR MIAMI, FL 33144---0 FIALA, TODD & JAYMEE 411 18TH AVE NE MAPLES, FL 34120---0 FIORE, JEANNE 2934 I N LET COVE LN E MAPLES, FL 34120---7507 FLANAGAN Ill, W JAMES 280 22ND AVE NE MAPLES, FL 34120---2329 FLEURIMA, PATRICK & KAREN 2280 8TH ST N E MAPLES, FL 34120---3435 FLORES, MIRIAM Y JOSE RAFAEL DIAZ 980 22ND AVE NE MAPLES, FL 34120---3413 FORGACIU, FLAVIU 28120 CREST PRESERVE CIR BOMITA SPRINGS, FL 34135---0 FOX, JAMES $c LI M DA M 3011 WILSON BLVD M MAPLES, FL 34120---1344 FRANCOIS, MARIE S .� i � 20044 W LAKE DR HiALEAH, FL 33015---2073 FRANCOIS, WIDNER MARIE ROSENE FRANCOIS 2205 GROVE DR MAPLES, FL 34120---0 FRANKE, BRUCE D & CHRiSTiNA N 657 18TH AVE NE MAPLES, FL 34120---0 FRANKLIN LIVING TRUST 2811 6TH ST N W MAPLES, FL 34120---0 FREDRICK, RONALD S DIANA L FREDRICi< STEVEN C FREDRICK 1100 MAYFIELD HOFFMAN ESTATES, IL 60169---0 GALLAGHER, LISA M 1861 8TH ST N E MAPLES, FL 34120---0 GAMAYO, ERIC MARYANIS SANFELIZ 940 RAN DALL B LVD MAPLES, FL 34120---3321 GARBALOSA, ROSA M POVIONES 20230 NW 42ND AVE MIAMI GARDENS, FL 33055---1335 GARCIA, ARIEL 2271 8TH ST N E MAPLES, FL 34120---3436 GARCIA, J UAN F& MARYAN N E D 2791 ORANGE GROVE TRL MAPLES, FL 34120---7527 GARCIA, RAMON 481 12TH AVE NW MAPLES, FL 34120---2550 i FRANIA, DIANA M 2810 ORANGE GROVE TRL MAPLES, FL 34120---7524 FRANKLIN LIVING TRUST 2811 6TH ST N W MAPLES, FL 34120---0 FRANQUI, JASON ISAMAR FRANQUI TORRES 2280 WILSON BLVD N MAPLES, FL 34120---0 FREYERMUTH, JOSEFINA D 2711 2ND ST NW MAPLES, FL 34120---3332 GALLEGOS, DANIEL MAIRA DIAZ 960 RANDALL BLVD MAPLES, FL 34120---3321 GAMUEDA, GENEVIEVE 1011 22ND AVE NE MAPLES, FL 34120---3443 GARCELL, LUIS 2856 BLOSSOM CT MAPLES, FL 34120---7528 GARCIA, FERNANDO & SUSANA R 2915 ORANGE GROVE TRL MAPLES, FL 34120---7450 GARCIA, LUCAS & CESALI S 981 22ND AVE NE MAPLES, FL 34120---3414 FRANK, THOMAS �, KIM HAURIEL 2646 ORANGE GROVE TRL MAPLES, FL 34120---0 FRANKLIN LIVING TRUST 2811 6TH ST NW � � MAPLES, FL 34120---0 i � FRAZIER, ALAN W & SHARON S 29102NDSTNE MAPLES, FL 34120---4310 GAFFOLI, ANTHONY J & MARLENE L 111 DUNG BLVD E MAPLES, FL 34120---6319 GALLOPS, CHARLES R PO BOX 640 IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---640 GANDINI, ROSE ANN T 2886 l N LET COVE LN W MAPLES, FL 34120---0 GARCIA, ABRAHAM C & LETICIA 3 STAN LEY CT ROCKVILLE, MD 20851---2228 GARCIA, JOEL A & ISLEIDI 434 24TH AVE N W MAPLES, FL 34120---0 GARCIA, RAFAEL & CAROLINA 1031 22ND AVE NE MAPLES, FL 34120---3443 � GARCIA, REGLA M ; GARCIA, RICARDO � �, LAZARO OJEDA � 981 22ND AVENUE NE i 240 24TH AVE NW � MAPLES, FL 34120---1598 MAPLES, FL 34120---0 GARCIA, RICARDO & TONI E 981 22ND AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---3414 GARCIA, YAMILET 2167 GROVE DR NAPLES, FL 34120---7517 GASPERSON, JENNIE 90 24TH AVE N E NAPLES, FL 34120---2368 GAZZUOLO, GEOFFREY J 2749 INLET COVE LN W NAPLES, FL 34120---0 GERALD M MCGRATH LIV TRUST MARILYN LOUISE PAPP LIV TRUST 192 24TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 GERBER, RICHARD &SARAN 2818 I N LET COVE LN W NAPLES, FL 34120---0 GERMAN, DAVID 7925 NW 174TH ST HIALEAH, FL 33015---3616 GIBBS, CRYSTAL 640 20TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---2334 GILCHRIST, JOSEPH HOLLAND CYNTHIA GILCHRIST 2783 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---7527 GLADEK, LESHEK IRENA BOROWSKA—GLADEK 2816 AMBERWOOD LN NAPLES, FL 34120---7523 ��, GARCIA, ROBERT & WENDY 2222 GROVE DR NAPLES, FL 34120---0 GARGANO, JOHN PAUL CECILIA BYERS GARGANO 531 18TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 GATT, JEFFREY A & MONICA L 28414TH ST N E NAPLES, FL 34120---1336 GENNARI, PIETRO & MELANIE 3160 WILSON BVLD N NAPLES, FL 34120---0 GERALD W MCCOLLUM R/LTRUST 8805 VANDERBILT BEACH RD NAPLES, FL 34120---0 GERLACH, WILLIAM E &DONNA J 1060 24TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 GIACOBBE, MARILIA CURRAL RAFFAELO GIACOBBE 7 MARSH CT W ESTPO RT, CT 06880---0 GIFFORD, JOHN M & EMMA M 441 20TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---2598 � GILMORE, ANGUS J & PATRICA A � 2291 8TH ST N E j NAPLES, FL 34120---3436 GLASS, JEFFREY C JAMES R GLASS �� i 529 22ND AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34120---0 GARCIA, ROBERT & WENDY 2222 GROVE DR NAPLES, FL 34120---0 GARGANO, JOHN PAUL CECILIA BYERS GARGANO 531 18TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 GATT, JEFFREY A & MONICA L 28414TH ST N E NAPLES, FL 34120---1336 GENNARI, PIETRO & MELANIE 3160 WILSON BVLD N NAPLES, FL 34120---0 GERALD W MCCOLLUM R/LTRUST 8805 VANDERBILT BEACH RD NAPLES, FL 34120---0 GERLACH, WILLIAM E &DONNA J 1060 24TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 GIACOBBE, MARILIA CURRAL RAFFAELO GIACOBBE 7 MARSH CT W ESTPO RT, CT 06880---0 GIFFORD, JOHN M & EMMA M 441 20TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---2598 � GILMORE, ANGUS J & PATRICA A � 2291 8TH ST N E j NAPLES, FL 34120---3436 GLASS, JEFFREY C JAMES R GLASS �� i 529 22ND AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34120---0 �. l . � � ,• �, i i GARCIA, SERGIO A 2762 6TH AVE SE NAPLES, FL 34117---0 GARITO, FRANK ANGELA GARITO 2859 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---7514 GATT, SARAN E STEPHANIE L GATT 28414TH ST NAPLES, FL 34120---0 GEORGE, LABBY TOM FJOSEPH 7816 NW 121ST WAY PARKLAND, FL 33076---4543 GERALD W MCCOLLUM R/LTRUST 8805 VANDERBILT BEACH RD NAPLES, FL 34120---0 GERMAIN, PETERSON SHANIQUA BAIZER 2815 ORANGE GROVE TRAIL NAPLES, FL 34120---0 GIANNI, BENNY & SADIE 77 CHESTNUT ST BELLEVILLE, NJ 07109---0 GILBERT, DENISE 2937 1 N LET COVE LN E NAPLES, FL 34120---7507 GILMORE, CRAIG S &DENISE 27814TH ST NW NAPLES, FL 34120---1391 GLASSON, JAMES H 8c LINDA B 216 5 RUSTY F i G CT NAPLES, FL 34120---7519 GM ADVISORS LLC 434 TERRACINA CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0 GOLDEN LAND PARTNERS LLC %INDIAN HILL PARTNERS 20 N WACKER DR #1922 CH I CAG 0, I L 60606---0 GOLDMAN, GREENBAUM RISA ELISE GREENBAUM LEVINSON ' SUSAN GREENBAUM ROQUITE 1925 LARGO RD JACKSONVILLE, FL 32207---0 GOMEZ, M DE JESUS CIFUENTES ADRIANA LEDESMA 25602NDSTNE NAPLES, FL 34120---4318 GONZALEZ, GUADALUPE JESSICA FUENMAYOR GONZALEZ 270 22ND AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34120---0 i GONZALEZ, ISMAEL &MARIA T 8114TH ST S E � NAPLES, FL 34117---2264 GONZALEZ, MANUEL YNERVIS �� CATHERINE ANN GONZALEZ � 2611 WILSON BLVD N i NAPLES, FL 34120---3303 i j GRACIELA MOYA LIVING TRUST � 1201 BONNIE DR � � TALLAHASSEE, FL 32304---0 GREENE, ALLISON & GEORGE 17 FOWLER LANE AMITYVILLE, NY 11701---0 GRIFFIN, AMELIA 2871 2ND ST NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 � i 1 � � GM ADVISORS LLC 434 TERRACI NA CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0 GOLDEN LAND PARTNERS LLC %INDIAN HILL PARTNERS 20 N WACKER DR #1922 CH I CAG 0, I L 60606---0 GOMEZ, DANIEL 2827 ORANGE GROVE TRAIL NAPLES, FL 34120---0 GOMEZ, RAMON &MARIA 6660 SW 158TH CT MIAMI, FL 33193---3645 GONZALEZ, 1BRAHIM I<ATHERINE M JURICH 631 18TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---6300 __ GONZALEZ, JASON A KAYLA SINGH-GONZALEZ 940 22ND AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 GONZALEZ, MANUEL YNERVIS CATHERINE ANN GONZALEZ MANUEL D GONZALEZ 2611 WILSON BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120---0 GRAHAM, ALICE G � 403 OAKLAND AVE STATEN ISLAND, NY 10310---2124 GREGOIRE, ROSE C 670 20TH AVE N E NAPLES, FL 34120---0 GRIFFIN, AMELIA 2871 2ND STREET NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 GM ADVISORS LLC 434 TERRACINA CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0 GOLDEN LAND PARTNERS LLC C/O INDIAN HILL PARTNERS �' � 20 N WACKER DR STE 1922 i CH I CAG 0, i L 60606---0 \I� � �,�� � � '� � , GOMEZ, JUAN � & SYBLE D 320 25TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---1341 GONZALES, RENE & YOLANDA 2680 2ND ST NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 GONZALEZ, I DALMYS 3219 32ND ST SW LEHIGH ACRES, FL 33976---0 GONZALEZ, JUAN VIOLETA ALVAREZ 2792 BERGAMOT LN NAPLES, FL 34120---7534 GOODMAN, MICHAEL JULIE AT R DUNCAN BEAHLER 391 24TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 GRADER, BARRY & NANCY 2808 6TH ST NW NAPLES, FL 34120---0 GRETZKY, BRIAN 2672 FISHTAIL PALM CT NAPLES, FL 34120---7567 GRIFFIN, NICHOLAS J & KARMEN R 175 25TH AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34120---1309 GRIZ, WILLIAM M &SUSAN K 61018THAVENE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 GUBALA, EDWARD J &JANET L 8078 PRINCETON DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34104---0 GUNSIOR, LEONARD �� 2242 GROVE DR j NAPLES, FL 34120---7500 GUTIERREZ, RAFAEL &MARICELA 755 20TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---2789 HAHN SR, TIMOTHY ALBERT SUSAN TYRRELL HAHN 2223 GROVE DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 I j NAND, JANE � 2820 WILSON BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120---2349 i HARRIS, GERARD & ELLEN ALICE 2876 ORANGE GROVE TRL i � NAPLES, FL 34120---0 HAUCK FAMILY TRUST 1300 RIVER PARK BLVD j NAPA, CA 94559---0 HC &SONS LLC � 25211 PINSON DR BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135---0 HEINDL, PHARES M 156 LELAND WAY MARCO ISLAND, FL 34145---4687 GRUNDEMAN, FREDRIC E &JANET A 2180 RUSTY FIG CT NAPLES, FL 34120---7519 GUDINO, WALTER 2671 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---7562 GURRAM, RAGHU & PADMAJA 1355 LONGLEA TERRACE WELLINGTON, FL 33414---9061 GUTIERREZ, RAFAEL &MARICELA 755 20TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---2789 HAIM BENZINO REV LIVING TRUST 10777 W SAMPLE RD #716 CORAL SPRINGS, FL 33065---0 HANSEN, HAMS CHRISTIAN JUDY BETH HANSEN 2163 GROVE DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 HARTINGER, ERIC RACHAEL MALMBERG 27142NDSTNE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 HAUENSTEIN, DAVID DEAN 703 MEYER DR NAPLES, FL 34120---1428 HEBBLE, DAVID T 3766 E MONON RD MONTICELLO, IN 47960---7135 HELENIAK, JENNIFER LONDON JOHN JOSEPH HELENIAK 2812 AMBERWOOD LN NAPLES, FL 34120---7521 S I. GRUSSENMEYER, PAUL G MARCINE R GRUSSENMEYER 461JUNG BLVD E NAPLES, FL 34120---0 GUERRA, ANGELA 2924 ORANGE GROVE TRAIL NAPLES, FL 34120---0 GUTIERREZ, LIZANDRO 340 18TH AVE N E NAPLES, FL 34120---0 HAGGARD, KELLY G MEGAN M HAGGARD 2255 GROVE DR NAPLES, FL 34120---7497 HALBERT, DAVID C 581 20TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---3372 HARDY, ROBERT PAUL MARTA HARDY 6110 AUTUMN OAKS LN NAPLES, FL 34119---0 HATCHER, MARC R 2711 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---7527 HAUPERT, MICHAEL D 460 20TH AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34120---0 HEDLEY, HUGH W 2232 GROVE DR NAPLES, FL 34120---7500 HEMMIT, EDWARD RAY & NATALIE 2966 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---0 HENRY, TERRANCE T YVONNE R RAMBO-HENRY 1711 N WILSON BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120---0 HERNANDEZ, BETTY ISABEL POSADA MIGUEL A SANCHEZ CARDOSO '; 27314TH ST N W NAPLES, FL 34120---1391 i HERNANDEZ, DOSE L JOHANNY HENRIQUEZ DE NUNEZ 2316 55TH ST SW �, NAPLES, FL 34116---0 HERRERA, JUAN R �, 1392 NW 80TH ST MIAMI, FL 33147---0 HIBBS, MERRILL D & CHERI R 2311 WILSON BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120---3358 I � HILLIS, SHAKE & COLEEN 321 22ND AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34120---0 HINKEL, ANGELA M 2887 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---0 HODOR, LUCIAN GEORGIANA IOANA HODOR 421 22ND AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---3370 ROGUE, LUCINDAK 1771 WILSON BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120---2340 HOLMES AVE & EISENHOWER BLVD LLC 8000 NW 7TH ST STE 201 MIAMI, FL 33126---0 HERMAN, SAMUEL & DANIELA 9971 WOODBURN DR SALINE, M I 48176---0 HERNANDEZ, DANIEL MARTA GONZALEZ YADID CACERES 1740 WILSON BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120---2339 HERRERA, JESUS &MARGARITA 461 24TH AVE N E NAPLES, FL 34120---2389 HERRERA, LAZARO A 9661 SW 102 AVENUE RD MIAMI, FL 33176---0 HILLER, SASHA MARK WILKINS 2769 I N LET COVE LN W NAPLES, FL 34120---0 HILTONTR, BONNIE JEAN RLTA DTD 6-9-92 180 FLAME VINE DR NAPLES, FL 34110---5701 HINTON, DOLLIE M 717 MEYER DR NAPLES, FL 34120---0 HOFFMAN, RICHARD & IDA ASHLEY 2218 GROVE DR NAPLES, FL 34120---7500 HOLES, CLINT & CERIN 2910 4TH ST N W NAPLES, FL 34120---0 HOLOCH, KEVIN & MARIA 2736 ORANGE GROVE TRAIL NAPLES, FL 34120---7563 i ,� I, HERNANDEZ MALDONADO, ELOY PRANCES MARIE MENDEZ MARTINEZ 181 22ND AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 HERNANDEZ, JOSE G ROSA M MARTINEZ 2826 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---0 HERRERA, JORGE L & fDANIA S 2785 2ND ST N E NAPLES, FL 34120---1329 HIBBARD, KEVIN 8c MAUREEN 31752NDSTNE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 HILLIS, DANA L & JANET J 2731 2ND ST NE NAPLES, FL 34120---1329 - - HILTON,TARAD PO BOX 1117 HILDEBRAND, NC 28637---0 HODOR, LUCIAN GEORGIANA IOANA HODOR 421 22ND AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 ROGUE, LUCINDA K 1771 WILSON BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120---2340 HOLMAN, DAVE C JUDITH L SUMNER-HOLMAN 8384 LAUREL LAKES BLVD NAPLES, FL 34119---0 HONSBERGER, DENNIS & SHILREY 2782 INLET COVE LN W � NAPLES, FL 34120---0 ', HOOVER, MARK V & ANGELA 2990 WILSON BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120---0 HSI YUEH W YEN REV TRUST 12345 N W 7TH ST MIAMI, FL 33182---0 HUANG, YI HUA 205JUNG BLVD W j NAPLES, FL 34120---0 HUBSCHER, PETER KIMBERLY LYNN STINGER 2806 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---0 HULL, DARL E 3130 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---1455 � HUYNH, YANG N & TRUC N 2187 WILSON BLVD N j NAPLES, FL 34120---2576 I LN H 0 M ES 463 LLC 3602 SANTAREN CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0 IRIZARRY, DENISE JEANNIE IRIZARRY 716 MEYER DR NAPLES, FL 34120---1427 ISSA, PRISSILLA 2970 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---7449 JACINTO, CARLOS & NORMA 7330 RINDGE AVE PLAYA DEL REY, CA 90293---8063 HOOVER, MATTH EW & PATRI CIA 290 22ND AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34120---3337 HSU, CHUM FANG & HSIU-HSIANG 35 CYNWYD DR CAPE MAY CH, NJ 08210---1979 HUBBS, RONALD DANIEL VERONICAACASCALESDE HUBBS 122 24TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 HUDSON, ROWS C & MICHELLE L 2640 4TH ST NW NAPLES, FL 34120---1384 HUMPHRIES, PATRICIA 441 2 OT H AVE N W NAPLES, FL 34120---2378 IGLESIA PENTECOSTES PENIEL INC 757 107TH AVE NORTH NAPLES, FL 34108---0 I LOTZ LLC 2148 GROVE DR NAPLES, FL 34120---0 IRVING III, MIKE 2741 I N LET COVE LN W NAPLES, FL 34120---7548 IULIANO, KRYSTYNA CHRISTINE IULIANO 1585 NE 110 TERRACE MIAMI, FL 33161---0 JACI<SON, KAITLIN 815 N HOMESTEAD BLVD #458 HOMESTEAD, FL 33030---0 J HOWARD, JON C & SHANNAN M 2860 WILSON BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120---2349 HTAY, MAU NG KYAW TIN N 00 HNIN WUTYEESOE 14396 TUSCANY POINTE COVE NAPLES, FL 34120---6006 HUBLER, ADAM & REBECCA 2832 AMBERWOOD LN NAPLES, FL 34120---0 HUGHES, MAUREEN 721 CHERRY BLOSSOM CT NAPLES, FL 34120---1493 HUYNH H NGUYEN & LIEN THI PRAM REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST 530 102ND AVE N NAPLES, FL 34108---3209 IGLESIA PENTECOSTES PENIEL INC 757 107TH AVE NORTH NAPLES, FL 34108---0 IRACI, JOSEPH C & JOAN M 2214 GROVE DR NAPLES, FL 34120---7500 ISON, CHELSEA TOOD G BENDER II 29642NDSTNE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 J & S DILLON JOINT REV TRUST 2861 WILSON BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120---0 JAFRI, ALI M NUZHAT A ABBASI KASHIF A JAFRI 10890 SANTA FE DR HOLLYWOOD, FL 33026---4958 JAKOB, ELIZABETH 580 22ND AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34120---0 JARRETT, GERALD L &LAMA V 25712ND ST NW NAPLES, FL 34120---4321 JOAN L MORAN REVOCABLE TRUST 2720 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---7563 i 1 JANKE, ANGELA J 2879 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---0 JEAN, HURBERT F & MARIE C 1960 WILSON BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120---3371 JOHN A KYLE REVOCABLE TRUST 4267 VALLEY FORGE PL EAGAN, MN 55123---1953 j JOKES SR, BOBBY LEON & NELDA C � ; JOKES, JEFFERY & DULCE A 2591 2ND ST NW 2801 INLET COVE LN W ' NAPLES, FL 34120---4321 I NAPLES, FL 34120---0 �� _� JOKES, MARK STEVEN � JOKES, ORA 2975 4TH ST NE 2228 VALENCIA LAKES CIR NAPLES, FL 34120---0 NAPLES, FL 34120---7498 i I � �. �- JORDAN ET AL, KATHERINE �` � JOSEPH P BAUCCIO REV TRUST DONALD CHEW MARY L BAUCCIO REV TRUST 711 AQUA VISTA DR 2186 GROVE DR GRANBURY, TX 76049---0 NAPLES, FL 34120---7515 i� JUKINS, GREGORY D �` � KADAM, SHILPA A � � � 642 CYPRESS GREEN CIR � TURINA E RASCHER i 2720 2ND ST NW WELLINGTON, FL 33414---6335 � NAPLES, FL 34120---0 I KAREN FREEMAN REV TRUST j KAREN FREEMAN REV TRUST 2740 WILSON BLVD N 2740 WILSON BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120---3351 NAPLES, FL 34120---3351 i i i i KASS, PATRICIA � KASTNER, PAUL A � SAMANTHA KASS 339 20TH AVE NW MELISSA KASS NAPLES, FL 34120---6324 S25 22ND AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34120---0 KCD HOLDINGS LLC �� KELLER, CALVIN D i 4711 1ST AVENUE NW j � 341 22ND AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34119---0 � � NAPLES, FL 34120---2322 .. JANSON FOLEY LLC 3150 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---0 JESSOP, RODNEY O 2481 8TH ST N E NAPLES, FL 34120---412 JOLLY, COURTNEY 2211 WILSON BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120---2346 JOKES, LEN 1920 WILSON BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120---3371 JOKES, PAULA & STEPHEN 22 HIAWATHA DR GREENVILLE, SC 29615---0 J OYCE, M I CH ELLE 2657 CITRUS KEY LI M E CT NAPLES, FL 34120---0 KAMINSKI, GERALD T & JO ANN 8545 BROADMOOR DR PALOS H I LLS, i L 60465---1721 KASAP, E M I LY DAW N 2802 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---7524 KATRYNIOK, PEDRO JOSE MARIA ANTONIA KATRYNIOK 2814 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---7524 KELLEY, BRIAN D 2653 FISHTAIL PALM CT NAPLES, FL 34120---7567 KELLY, BILL F & JEANENE 2730 4TH ST NW NAPLES, FL 34120---1382 KERN, THOMAS P & DENELLE M 392 24TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 KERSKIE, ERNEST W 4491 3 R D AVE N W NAPLES, FL 34119---2603 KILPATRICK, BOB 2811 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---0 KINNEY, STEVEN J 4371 HARBOR BLVD PORT CHARLOTTE, FL 33952---0 KLOSEK, TIMOTHY & OANH 2781 AMBERWOOD CT NAPLES, FL 34120---0 i KNUETTEL, BJOERN C & MELISSA S 2172 GROVE DR NAPLES, FL 34120---0 ' I<OLASKOSKI, ANTHONY LINDA I<OLAKOSI<I 2164 GROVE DR NAPLES, FL 34120---7515 KEMPER, CARLTON B 6044 H I STO RY LAND H WY FARNHAM, VA 22460---2607 KERNAN, BETTY J 2263 GROVE DR NAPLES, FL 34120---0 KESY HOLDINGS LLC FL LTD LIABILITY CO A 19572 DIPLOMAT DR MIAMi, FL 33179---0 KIMBLE,ARTHURJ 3091 2ND ST NE NAPLES, FL 34120---1333 KLINE, HAMERA 2892 BLOSSOM CT NAPLES, F� 34120---7528 KLUTTZ III, THOMAS SEAY WEIWEI JANG 2652 FISHTAI L PALM CT NAPLES, FL 34120---0 KOCI, ORIOLA 680 22ND AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---3305 KOLMANN, CHARLES F & MARCIA A 2253 VALENCIA LAI<ES CIR NAPLES, FL 34120---7499 i KONANDREAS, LUKAS & GEORGIA KORDELSKI, DAVE &CHERYL 34 I<ONANDREAS DR � � 2836 AMBERWOOD LN STAMFORD, CT 06903---2100 � ; NAPLES, FL 3412Q---7523 i I KREILICH, REGINALD � I<REISLER, SCOTT J &CHERYL S 3340 215T AVE SW ! 2824 AMBERWOOD LN NAPLES, FL 34117---6614 NAPLES, FL 34120---7523 ICEPP JR, W THOMAS ELIZABETH A KEPP 3061 ORANGE GROVE TRAIL NAPLES, FL 34120---0 KERSEY II, MICHAEL E DANIELLE M KERSEY 2331 8TH ST N E NAPLES, FL 34120---0 I<EYSER, RICHARD & RENE M � 620 22ND AVE NE I! '� I NAPLES, FL 34120---0 � KING, DAVID ALAN � GLORIA LILLYANA KING �I 2776 I N LET COVE LN W NAPLES, FL 34120---0 I �, . �. KLINGENSMITH, JOHN J CANDACE KLINGENSMITH 2848 INLET COVE LN W • NAPLES, FL 34120---7559 KLUWE, BARBARA C 2206 GROVE DR NAPLES, FL 34120---7500 KOJOUSHKOVA, N BOGOSLOVOVA MARIA NIKOLAEVA KOJOUSHKOVA 220 20TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---6307 I<ONANDREAS LIVING TRUST 34 KONANDREAS DR STAMFORD, CT 06903---2100 I<RECOW, GINA 2170 RUSTY FIG CT NAPLES, FL 34120---7519 KROLAK, ROBERT V & GLORIA 545 22ND AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34120---2324 KROMMENHOEK, SCOTT & KESHIA 2785 INLET COVE LN W NAPLES, FL 34120---0 KUOMAN, RICHARD W & ANA MARIA 2953 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---7450 L & CECILIA DIAZ REV TRUST 2230 18TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 LABERGE, MICHAELJ JOYCE G WHEELER 381 22ND AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 LAFRANCE, ERMITHE 2831 ORANGE GROVE TRAIL NAPLES, FL 34120---0 LALLAVE, YARUBZA &ANGEL 1927 55TH ST S W NAPLES, FL 34116---0 LANDBERG, MATTHEW J MARY BETH LANDBERG 3233 CITRON DR NAPLES, FL 34120---2765 LE, HUNG VAN I<IEU THI MONG LE 171 24TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 LECOMPTE, JENIFER & GERALD 2901 I N LET COVE LN W NAPLES, FL 34114---7917 140 20TH AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34120---2381 I` �j KRYLOV, IGOR SERGIY CHUMACHOK 2500 TAMIAMI TRAIL NORTH STE 212 NAPLES, FL 34103---0 KUOMAN, THAIS 28 33 INLET COVE LN W NAPLES, FL 34120---0 L AND C DIAZ REV TRUST 2230 18TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 LABUZIENSKI, CHRISTINE A I<RISTEN L LABUZIENSKI 2766 INLET COVE LN W NAPLES, FL 34120---0 LAGRASTA R/E HOLDINGS I LLC 568 ROMA CT NAPLES, FL 34110---6402 LAMPKIN, JOSEPH LAMAR TAELESE TAMARA LAMPKIN 2878 INLET COVE LANE W NAPLES, FL 34120---0 LANZINGER, GIRARD F BARBARA A LANZINGER 2229 VALENCIA LAKES CIR NAPLES, FL 34120---7499 LEACH, JULIENNE THIMOLEON 2640 WiLSON BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120---3302 LEDESMA, GLORIA N CARLOS FERNANDO BALOCO 3068 2ND ST NW NAPLES, FL 34120---0 LEE, RUTH 2710 6TH ST NW NAPLES, FL 34120---4315 i i KUOMAN, ALFONSO ROSA E ANGULO DE KUOMAN 2957 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---74S0 I<USTERER, ERNEST A & JOANNE 241 WINFIELD TERRACE UNION, NJ 07083---0 LABARCA, RAMON & LORI 2757 INLET COVE LN W NAPLES, FL 34120---7548 LADURINI, RAYMOND 1041 22ND AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---3443 L,AINHART, TODD & LORI 2531 2ND ST NE NAPLES, FL 34120---4319 LAND TRUST NO 37596440008 20302 SW 321 STREET HOMESTEAD, FL 33030---0 LAWSON, BRANDON & KELLIE 360 20TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---2319 LEBLOND, WILLIAM BYRNE TAMMI JEAN JAMISON 2245 VALENCIA LAKES CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 LEE, AUSTI N 415 20TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 LEE, SCOTT A & NANCY M 2161 RUSTY FIG COURT NAPLES, FL 34120---0 LEEDS, MICHAEL L & LEANNE L 2390 6TH ST N W NAPLES, FL 34120---1325 LESTER Ii, CLARENCE SHELBY 4412 E FAIRFIELD ST MESA, AZ 85205---5201 LEWIS III, KENNETH GERVASE 3621 I<ENT DR NAPLES, FL 34112---3739 LIKRAMA, GENTIAN & GERTA 2762 I N LET COVE LN NAPLES, FL 34120---0 LITKA REVOCABLE TRUST 29402NDSTNE NAPLES, FL 34120---4310 LOEWEL, ROBERT & CHRISTINA 1041 24TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 LOPARDO, NICOLA & MARIANNE J 2787 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---7527 � LO P EZ, KATYA PO BOX 161387 HIALEAH, FL 33016---24 LOWERY, LAURA WILLIAM B MCCANN RYAN T M CCAN N KEVIN A MCCANN 10504 N WA�ii-S SPRINGS PARK RD � EDGERTON, WI 53534---0 LSF9 MSTR PARTICIPATION TRUST %HUDSON HOMES MGMT LLC 3701 REGENT BLVD #200 IRVING, TX 75063---0 �� LENIO, COREY CAITLIN N ZAPPOLA 27114TH STREET NW NAPLES, FL 34120---0 LESTER II, CLARENCE SHELBY 4412 E FAIRFIELD ST MESA, AZ 85205---5201 LEWIS, RANDALL A &MARSHA A 2864 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---7513 LINGLE, JERKY L &MARSHA C 2239 GROVE DR NAPLES, FL 34120---0 LITTLE, CO LLI N J 2841 I N LET COVE LN W NAPLES, FL 34120---7569 LONDON, MARC E &DONNA D 26814TH ST NW NAPLES, FL 34120---1306 LOPERA, MARIA ELENA 530 22ND AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---3304 LOPEZ, MARIA C 2790 AMBERWOOD COURT NAPLES, FL 34120---0 LOZINSKI, JERZY P 2274 GROVE DR NAPLES, FL 34120---7496 LUDEMANN, JENNIFER RAE TIMOTHY LUDEMANN 2875 2ND STREET NW NAPLES, FL 34120---0 LEONE, SALVATORE & SANTA 15936 82ND ST HOWARD BEACH, NY 11414---2927 LEVY, N OAM MIRI ARMOZA 2560 8TH AVE SE NAPLES, FL 34117---0 LIGHTCAP, BARBARA 1471 ROCK RD NAPLES, FL 34120---3844 LINTZ, JOE H & TERESA M 6613 DAHLIA DR M I RAMAR, FL 33023---4910 LITTON, SHEILA 2847 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---7514 LONGO, GLORIA A 2680 6TH ST NW NAPLES, FL 34120---1305 LOPEZ, EMMA 2191 WILSON BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120---2576 LOURO, MICHAEL & KORI L 2891 BLOSSOM CT NAPLES, FL 34120---7528 LSF9 MASTER PART TRUST %HUDSON HOMES MGMT LLC 3701 REGENT BLVD #200 IRVING, TX 75063---0 LUIZZI III, LAWRENCE FRANCIS CRYSTIE M LUIZZI 2590 4TH ST NW NAPLES, FL 34120---0 i LU KASZEW I CZ, ADAM BEATA SUICK 2980 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---7449 LUSSIER, RONALD A & GRETCHEN S 3040 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---1448 MACHOULE, FRANTZ ELIJAH ENOUSE MACHOULE 2770 INLET COVE LN W NAPLES, FL 34120- 0 MANDICHE, VICTOR CHIRIGUAYA MAUREEN CHIRIBUAYA 3130 WILSON BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120---0 MAOLA, ROSS & PATRICIA 411 24TH AVE N E NAPLES, FL 34120- 0 MARKHAM, KE1TH D & PAULA A 220 241 H AVE N E NAPLES, FL 34120---2386 MARLU LLC 485 20TH AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34120---2378 MARRETTA, DEANN 2283 GROVE D R NAPLES, FL 34120---7497 MARTELL, JUAN MORALES ISAMARY RICARDO GONZALEZ 463 18TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120- 0 MARTINEZ, EDDY SANDRA CABRERA MACIAS ELISABET MARTINEZ CABRERA 1873 8TH ST NE NAPLES, FL 34120- 0 I LUND, MERRILL A & LINDA D LUPIEN, DAVID H 2867 BLOSSOM CT 2267 GROVE DR NAPLES, FL 34120---7528 NAPLES, FL 34120---7497 LYDON, KRISTEN MACAY, CEASAR & YVETTE 2794 INLET COVE LN W 2911 2ND ST NE NAPLES, FL 34120---7543 ' NAPLES, FL 34120---3434 MAHARAJ, KHASRAJ l MALEBRAN, CARLOS & TAYMI 2721 INLET COVE LN W 2833 INLET COVE LN W NAPLES, FL 34120---7548 NAPLES, FL 34120---7569 i MANIATES, GEORGIA MANZO, JOSE V & ADELITA 1536 W 25TH ST STE 234 45 25TH AVE NE SAN PEDRO, CA 90732---4415 NAPLES, FL 34120---0 MARGARET ANN KLASA REV TRUST MARINELLI, GENEVA KILBERT PO BOX 1264 ANTHONY JOSEPH MARINELLI MARCO ISLAND, FL 34146---0 2879 BLOSSOM CT i NAPLES, FL 34120---0 MARLU LLC MARLU LLC o LUIS RAMOS PRESIDENT 485 20TH AVE NW 20TH AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34120---2378 NAPLES, FL 34120---0 MAROTTA, CHRISTOPHER & AMY 2714 INLET COVE LN W NAPLES, FL 34120---7543 MARSH II, ROBERT JOHN JOANNE LEE MARSH 3071 ORANGE GROVE TRAIL NAPLES, FL 34120---0 MARTIN, STEVEN GABRIEL MARIA BELEN MARTIN 1034 241 H AVE N E NAPLES, FL 34120---0 MARTINEZ, I VAN R TAHIMI LAND 2737 I N LET COVE LN W NAPLES, FL 34120---7548 MARQUEZ, OSCAR HERNANDEZ ROSA E BALLADARES HERNANDEZ 1730 WILSON BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120---0 MARSHALL, RYAN & SAMANTHA 2640 FISHTAIL PALM COURT NAPLES, FL 34120---0 r MARTIN, VIRGINIA RAMOS � 2872 BLOSSOM CT I NAPLES, FL 34120---0 i i MARTINEZ, JOSEPH SHIRLEY K MENDEZ URiBE 2935 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120- 0 MARTINEZ, LUIS & MARTHA 2710 4TH ST N W NAPLES, FL 34120---1382 MAST, ROBERT A & MELINDA A 3101 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---7516 MASSEY, MARK B P MAGALY MONTALBETTI SALDANA 5012 OLD POND DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34104---0 MC CLOSKEY JR, JOHN E &ROSE G 730 CHERRY BLOSSOM CT NAPLES, FL 34120---1493 MCMILLEN,TODD WENDY TOMAC 1890 8TH ST N E NAPLES, FL 34120---3461 �- j MCCALL, DAVID L & MARYANN 2653 CITRUS KEY LIME CT � NAPLES, FL 34120---0 � MCCHESNEY, JON & ELSA 6872 TRAIL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34108---0 MCCRACKEN JR, REX GENE MICHELLE GILLIS JOHNSON 6670 H U NTI NGTON CI R NAPLES, FL 34119---0 MCNALLY, SALLY & GARY ! 960 24TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---5465 MEDEROS, ELIZABETH A 130 24TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---2359 I �_ i MARTINEZ, LUISA M 3050 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---0 MASON, CHARLES LARRY CAROL SHERRIE LANDRUM 3031 WILSON BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120---1344 MATTHEW, TIMOTHY F SABINEJ MATTHEW 2081 WILSON BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120---2344 MC GILL, ROBERT PO BOX 22 HARRIET, AR 72639---22 MCALEAR, MARY 3121 ORANGE GROVETRL NAPLES, FL 34120---1454 MCCALL, EDWARD & BRENDA 2673 FISHTAIL PALM CT NAPLES, FL 34120---7567 MCCORKLE, AMBER 2767 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---7527 MCDONALD, DUSTIN EARL MILLERD KIMBERLY A TRUBIANO-MCDONALD 2789 I N LET COVE LN W NAPLES, FL 34120---7548 MEDEROS REVOCABLE TRUST 110 22ND AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 MEDEROS, GILBERTO 1130 CREEKSIDE PKWY UNIT #110874 NAPLES, FL 34108---0 i !� I: � �` MARZANO, LAURA 2888 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---7513 MASSEY, MARK B P MAGALY MONTALBETTI SALDANA 5012 OLD POND DR NAPLES, FL 34104---0 MAXWELL, MICHAEL K & PATRICIA 3081 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---1494 MC MAHON, BRIAN J &SARI B 360 22ND AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34120---2321 MCALLISTER, RYAN AMANDA MCCOLL 1071 22ND AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 MCCHESNEY, JON 170 25TH AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34120---0 MCCORMICK, NICHOLAS TYLER ALLISA NICOLE MCCORMICK 6046 NATIONAL BLVD AVE MARIA, FL 34142---0 MCKISSICK JR, KENNETH 2982 2ND ST NE NAPLES, FL 34120---439 MEDEROS, ANA 2160 WILSON BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120---4322 MEDEROS, JUAN & LUZ 110 22ND AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---6304 MEDINA, ERNESTO &MARIA MEDINA, JUAN MEDINA, LUIS 25314TH ST NE � MARIA DE LA LUZ LOPEZ � 27414TH ST NW NAPLES, FL 34120---0 � 2771 2ND ST NW � � NAPLES, FL 34120---1391 NAPLES, FL 34120---3332 : I MEHWALD, WERNER 0 � MELEE REVOCABLE TRUST MELLO,�BRIAN & NICOLE CHRISTINE E MEHWALD � 621 22ND AVE NE � ! 2656 FISHTAIL PALM CT 2219 GROVE DR � NAPLES, FL 34120---2764 � NAPLES, FL 34120---0 NAPLES, FL 34120---0 ' � � MELOTTI, PETER A & KAREN M � MENDEZ, MILEYDIS � MENDEZ, ROGER 1245 CRESENT ST E f � 4335 12TH STREET NE CASTILLO, EURIDICE V � LEHIGH ACRES, FL 33974---0 � NAPLES, FL 34120---0 911 20TH AVE NE Ij �, NAPLES, FL 34120---8403 � , _l ' � i MENDOLA, GERALD & JOANNE E 1 MENENDEZ, CARLOS & MARIA C i MERAN, ESTELA T 2931 ORANGE GROVE TRL 2820 AMBERWOOD LN � 165 JUNG BLVD W I NAPLES, FL 34120---7450 NAPLES, FL 34120---7523 j NAPLES, FL 34120---3346 ', i � << MERCHANT, LANCE W � MERINO, LEONOR � MERKLE, THOMAS JAMES & GAIL F ELAINE B PEARCE LESLIE ACCILIO � 27614TH ST NE 3111 WILSON BLVD N � � 2175 GROVE DR NAPLES, FL 34120---1850 NAPLES, FL 34120---1346 NAPLES, FL 34120---7517 I _., �_ MESSINA REVOCABLE TRUST ��'� �� MEUNIER, ANDREW C MHM RANDALL LLC I 2225 VALENCIA LAKES CIR ' 3041 ORANGE GROVE TRL 2670 HORSESHOE DR N #201 I NAPLES, FL 34120---7499 NAPLES, FL 34120---1494 � NAPLES, FL 34104---0 i , MICIELI, PHILIP A & MAUREEN M �, MILANOVIC, DUSAN i� MILETTE, STEVEN R 2728 ORANGE GROVE TRL DANIELLE JULIA MILANOVIC JENNIFER C MAY NAPLES, FL 34120---7563 � 2942 INLET COVE LANE EAST I 2431 2ND ST NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 ' NAPLES, FL 34120---0 i MILLARD, JOHN W � I MILLER, JAMES & LINDA S � f MILLER, MARSHAL ALLEN MAVELYN VELIZ TANG i 2920 2ND ST NW � NICOLE MILLER �'� 2725 INLET COVE LN W , �� NAPLES, FL 34120---0 � 244 24TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---7548 NAPLES, FL 34120---0 i � i 1 1 I i i �� MILLER, TODD W MINICK, GARY & NICOLE � MIRAMAR SOLUTION GROUP INC � 2801 AMBERWOOD LANE 311 22ND AVE NW 2791 GOLDEN GATE BLVD E NAPLES, FL 34120---0 � � NAPLES, FL 34120---2322 NAPLES, FL 34120---0 i � � I j I MK REALTY ORANGETREE LLC � MOLINA, OTTO D AVEIGA 'I MOLINARI, MICHAEL J 6685 COLLIER BLVD � I HEBERTO ARIAS BLANCO � CONSTANCE P MOLINARI � NAPLES, FL 34114---0 i 2161 CLEMENTIN ST � I 1714 W 1ST ST NAPLES, FL 34120---0 ! BROOKLYN, NY 11223---1747 MOLLBERG, PAUL R & MEGAN L 2798 AMBERWOOD CT NAPLES, FL 34120---7520 MONTGOMERY, LEONARD G NORMA L MONTGOMERY INNIS 2789 AMBERWOOD CT NAPLES, FL 34120---7520 MONVILLE REVOCABLE TRUST 681 DUNG BLVD E NAPLES, FL 34120---6326 MOORE, CHRISTOPHER S RACHEL M MOORE 2837 AMBERWOOD LANE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 MORAL, JORGE G 2597 6TH ST NW NAPLES, FL 34120---0 MORAN, STACEY 2648 CITRUS KEY LIME CT NAPLES, FL 34120---7565 MORGAN, DUSTIN & MAGGIE 2744 IRONWOOD DR BULLHEAD CITY, AZ 86429---0 �_ MORRIS, KEVIN R ERIN P MYERS 640 24TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---2765 I MUGAVERO, TIMOTHY R i CHRISTINE J MUGAVERO � 341 18TH AVE NE ' NAPLES, FL 34120---6330 MURADAZ, REYNERIO A & ANNMARIE 2641 CITRUS KEY LIME CT NAPLES, FL 34120---7565 MONGALO-VITERI, MYRIAM WILLISM VITERI 560 20TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 MONTSTREAM, DIANE 2941 WILSON BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120---2350 MOON, GERALD LEE 2950 4TH ST N E NAPLES, FL 34120---0 MOORER, CONRAD L & DELENE R 2930 I N LET COVE LN E NAPLES, FL 34120---7507 MORAL, JORGE G 2597 6TH ST NW NAPLES, FL 34120---0 MOREAU, MADITA LUCNER OLCIMA 2821 I N LET COVE LN W NAPLES, FL 34120---0 MORGAN, SHIRLEY L PATRICIA A BENNETT HAMILTON, WILLIAM I=& DANA L 561 22ND AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 MOSCHIANO, LAWRENCE V SHAWNEE L MOSCHAIANO 2661 2ND ST NW NAPLES, FL 34120---1389 MUNOZ, EMILIO A 2279 GROVE DR NAPLES, FL 34120---0 MURAWSKI, ELIZABETH M EDWARD S MURAWSI<1 2656 CITRUS KEY LIME CT NAPLES, FL 34120---0 MONTE DE OCA, ISMAEL 2810 4TH ST NW NAPLES, FL 34120---1394 MONVILLE REV TRUST UTD 10/9/20 681 DUNG BLVD E NAPLES, FL 34120---6326 MOORE REVOCABLE TRUST 2249 VALENCIA LAKES CIR NAPLES, FL 34120---7499 MORAIS, ALFREDO ELLIE OLIVEIRA-MORAIS 141 20TH AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34120---0 MORALES, ERIC & MARIAPIA 1959 WILSON BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120---0 MORENO, MANUEL M & ANASTACIA V 2840 2ND ST NW NAPLES, FL 34120---1392 MOROSINI JR, RICHARD MICHAEL TABITHA R MOROSINI 2795 ORANGE GROVE TRAIL NAPLES, FL 34120---0 MOSER, PETER D & MELANIE A 2181 RUSTY FIG COURT NAPLES, FL 34120---0 MUNOZ, ORLANDO SANDRA BLANCO 980 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120---3321 MURPHY, MICHELLE DAVI D YOCH I M 3031 4TH ST NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 _' MYERS, GARY L & CH RIS J 2171 GROVE DR NAPLES, FL 34120---0 NADAV, ORI & USHA 1 MATTAWOMAN WAY ACCOKEEK, MD 20607---0 NAGY, STEPHEN L 2943 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---7450 NASCIMENTO, ALEXANDRE D 520 22ND AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---3304 NEGRIEL, MERLINE JOSENAT RIGAUD NEGRIEL 2819 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---0 NGUYEN, BAO THOA THI THANH NGUYEN 3090 ORANGE GROVE TRAIL NAPLES, FL 34104---0 NGUYEN, TINA H &JIMMY 2874 I N LET COVE LN W NAPLES, FL 34120---7538 NICHIA, EDDY 12260 NW 8TH ST MIAMI, FL 33182---0 NIETO JR, PAULINO & CAROLINE 2270 8TH ST N E NAPLES, FL 34120---3435 NINO, JAIME & ELIZABETH 888 31ST ST SW NAPLES, FL 34117---0 �� MYLI, STEVEN & DEANA 26602NDSTNE NAPLES, FL 34120---1326 NAFDOF PRIVATE SERIES 1 LLC 2316 PINE RIDGE RD #453 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 NAJERA, ASTRID J OMAR NAJERA 1861 WILSON BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120---2342 NCH HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INC P 0 BOX 413029 NAPLES, FL 34102---0 NELSON, ARTHUR W & KAREN S 2961 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---7450 NGUYEN, C.�UY D 29 MONMOUTH ST CH ELMSFORD, MA 01824---2805 NGUYEN, TRINH XUAN CHI LAN NGU 2863 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---0 NICKLOS INVESTMENTS LLC 1350 MISTY PINES CIR #106 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 NIETO,JUAN 311 18TH AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34120---2326 NOBA CAPITAL GROUP LLC 10515 NW 30TH AVE MIAMI, FL 33147---0 MYLI, STEVEN L & DEANNA 2660 2ND ST NE NAPLES, FL 34120---1 NAGY, CHARLES & CYNTHIA 190 24TH AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34120---6336 NAPOLI 1 LLC 5576 HAMMOCK ISLE DR NAPLES, FL 34119---4691 NEBUS, J 60 LOGAN BLVD S NAPLES, FL 34119---0 NEMETH, DANIELJ BETH E BOUCHER NEMETH 2664 FISHTAI L PALM CT NAPLES, FL 34120---0 NGUYEN, TINA 2880 WILSON BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34109---0 NGUYEN, VU HUONG THI NGO 2661 CITRUS KEY LIME CT NAPLES, FL 34120---0 NICOMATT LLC 1142 NW 162ND AVE PEMBROKE PINES, FL 33028---1227 NIGHTINGALE, KARINA I CHRISTOPHER NIGHTINGALE 2530 WILSON BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120---2347 NODA-SILVERIO, DAVID RAQUEL L RODRIGUEZ-LORENZO 321 20TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---4545 NORMANDIN, BRIAN & LISA M 359 22ND AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 NUESS, RICHARD D BLDG AND RFNG CONTRACTOR 4024 BROOKDALE DR f<E17ER1NG, OH 45429---1309 i OEl-iING, WAYNE A & LORI A i 541 20TH AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34120---6303 OLLIS, JAROLD & BELVA 611 WHITHER CT SELLERSBURG, IN 47172---1733 OREKHOV, TATYANA & VASILIY 133 DUNG BLVD W NAPLES, F L 34120---0 ORTEGA JR, ERNESTO �, PROVIDENCE DE AZA i 3051 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---0 � ORTIZ, ELIANA M � LUIS EUGENIO TEJADA JR 2807 ORANGE GROVE TRL � NAPLES, FL 34120---0 I ORTIZ, JUAN DIEGO r GUADALUPE BAUTISTA � 2061 WILSON BLVD N � NAPLES, FL 34120---0 OSPI NA, H ERNAN D LILIANA J LEDESMA 2845 I N LET COVE LN W � NAPLES, FL 34120---0 �� OWENS, COLLEEN GAIL 2471 8TH ST N E NAPLES, FL 34120---412 '� NOSEK SR, WESLEY A & CRISTINA 2261 VALENCIA LAKES CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 NUNEZ-TORRES, ROBERTO NIURKA MEJIAS 7910 NW 169TH TERRACE MIAMI, FL 33016---0 OKHMAN, TIMOFEY MIKAYLOVICH ANASTASSIYA OKHMAN 25771JUNIPERAVENUE NEW PRAGUE, MN 56071---0 O'MALLEY, JOSEPH S &IVY L 2257 VALENCIA LAI<ES CIR NAPLES, FL 34120---7499 OROS, REBECCA JASMINE RICHARD G PINTARIES 8716 IBIS COVE CIR NAPLES, FL 34119---0 ORTIZ, DAYMARIS 1941 8TH ST N E NAPLES, FL 34120---0 ORTIZ, DOSE LUIS GONZALEZ LUCIEMARI BONILLA 708 MEYER DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 ORTIZ, LUIS OMAIRA LEDESMA 2753 INLET COVE LN W NAPLES, FL 34120---0 OSPINA, JORGE IVAN 2898 1 N LET COVE LN W NAPLES, FL 34120---7538 PADDYFOTE, CLEMENT & LAURA 384 20TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---2319 'i NOYA, ROGELIO E & JOYCE A 2481 6TH ST N W NAPLES, FL 34120---1366 O GRADY, DAMES T & PATRICIA A 3030 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---1448 OLAH, TONY PO BOX 551 NAPLES, FL 34106---551 �. � � ONEILL, KAREN 2691 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---7562 'i � O'ROURKE, SUSAN 2161 8TH ST N E NAPLES, FL 34120---3427 ORTIZ, DIANA 440 2 2 N D AV E N E NAPLES, FL 34120---2331 ORTIZ, JUAN DIEGO GUADALUPE BAUTISTA 2061 WILSON BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120---0 OSCEOLA, KARIE JO 25802NDSTNE NAPLES, FL 34120---4318 i OVERCASH, CHRIS L & DOROTHY D 80 24TH AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34120---0 -, ., PALACIO, JUANITA M J OAQU I N C PALACIO J UANA PALACIO 622 E RIDGE VILLAGE DR CUTLER BAY, FL 33157---0 PALMORE, DONALD J PANELLA, SHARON A PAQUETTE, ITA KAREN L WHEELER 660 20TH AVE NE ARTHUR WALTER PAQUETTE III 3080 ORANGE GROVE TRL � NAPLES, FL 34120---2334 2880 2ND ST NW NAPLES, FL 34120---0 � � NAPLES, FL 34120---1392 PARMENTER, DAVID W & MICHELE L PASTOR, MAURICIO & PATRICIA PATRASCU, SIMION 371 22ND AVE NW 90 25TH AVE NW j 2786 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---2322 i NAPLES, FL 34120---1308 � NAPLES, FL 34120---0 ', �' 1', PATTON, JOHN J PAUL V TATEO REV TRUST � PAWLAK, JOHN & STEPHANIE 8044 ASSOCIATE BLVD j COURTNEY S TATEO 2190 GROVE DR SEBRING, FL 33876---6600 � ! PO BOX 2051 ! NAPLES, FL 34120---0 MARCO ISLAND, FL 34146---0 � � i i I � �' i a� PAYAN, AARON �� � PECK, NANCY TODD � PEEK, JAMIE L & BRANDON JAZMIN PAYAN ZULETA � 709 MEYER DR � MATTHEW DAVID KLEIST 2876 BLOSSOM COURT � NAPLES, FL 34120---0 � 2791 WILSON BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120---0 � �' NAPLES, FL 34120---0 PELLETIER, JOHN M & JENNIFER L PEMBERTON, CHANTE DONA �, � PEREZ GARCIA, MIVIA 29614TH ST NE i; 2754 INLET COVE LN W 724 MEYER DR NAPLES, FL 34120---1338 NAPLES, FL 34120---0 � NAPLES, FL 34120---0 �, — — -_ �, PEREZ III, RAUL & ELISABETH 1 � PEREZ, AMARILYS PEREZ, ANTONIO L & MAYRA E 2864 BLOSSOM CT CECILIO HERNANDEZ 59 E 45TH ST NAPLES, FL 34120---0 560 22ND AVE NE � HIALEAH, FL 33013---1823 NAPLES, FL 34120---0 'i t PEREZ, BORJA LOPEZ �� PEREZ, CARLOS ALBERTO � � PEREZ, ISIDORA SUSANA DEL ROCIO GOMEZ PAS 560 22ND AVE NW 3011 ORANGE GROVE TRL 2222 WILSON BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120---2323 NAPLES, FL 34120---1494 --- NAPLES, FL 34120 0 i j � � i �_ _ _ _ _ j PEREZ, JOSE & JULIE JEANELL � � PEREZ, LUIS R PEREZ, MARIA C & CARLOS A 2883 ORANGE GROVE TRAIL � � 1677 BIRDIE DR GUSTAVO GABRIEL PEREZ NAPLES, FL 34120---0 , NAPLES, FL 34120---0 � ' 3021 ORANGE GROVE TRAIL NAPLES, FL 34120---0 li � II PEREZ, MARIA ELENA 2918 I N LET COVE LN E NAPLES, FL 34120---7507 PETER DECARLO REV TRUST 141 18TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 i PEREZ, MIGUEL JULISSA PORRAS PEREZ 1741 WILSON BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120---0 PETER DECARLO REVOCABLE TRUST 7 SACKVILLE STREET CHARLESTOWN, MA 02129---0 PERKINS EST, JOEL J JODI DILL MARSH PR CLARE M BURDEN 95 22ND AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 � PEZZUTO, MICHAEL & BARBARA 2880 ORANGE GROVE TRL � NAPLES, FL 34120---7513 PHAN, NAM V 45 HARTFORD AVE DRACUT, MA 01826---0 PINEDA, RAFAEL 4345 MISTLETHRUSH LM MAPLES, FL 34119---8944 PLAMONDON, JOY LYNNE 581 24TH AVE NE MAPLES, FL 34120---2362 POLAMCO, KENNY & ANNELISSE 3090 2ND ST NW MAPLES, FL 34120---1349 PRADO, MIGUEL A SILVIA PAOLA GUTIERREZ 372 24TH AVE N E MAPLES, FL 34120---0 PRICE, SONIA 81198TH AVE N MAPLES, FL 34108---0 � PROGRESS RES BORROWER 2 LLC PO BOX 4090 SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85261---0 PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS INC PO BOX 32018 LAKELAMD, FL 33802---0 QUESNEL, GEORGES & GENEVIEVE 2169 RUSTY FIG CT MAPLES, FL 34120---7519 RADONCIC, SELIM AFERDITA AHMETAJ-RADONCIC 589 24TH AVE NE MAPLES, FL 34120---0 PHILLIPS, KEVIN BRYCE CHRISTINE LYMN PHILLIPS 2649 CITRUS KEY LIME CT MAPLES, FL 34120---0 PIPERSBURG, DAWNA ESTELLE 30914TH STREET NE MAPLES, FL 34120---0 PLANCHER, JOHN MONA DEROY 2644 FISHTAIL PALM CT MAPLES, FL 34120---0 PORTER, WILLIAM T 77 NORTHWOOD BLVD CENTRAL ISLI P, NY 11722---4671 PRATT, DONALD & KIMBERLY 2825 I N LET COVE LN W MAPLES, FL 34120---7569 PROEMZA TR, WALFRID0 5 WALFRIDO S PROENZA TRUST UTFD 08/07/03 515 LOGAN BLVD S MAPLES, FL 34119---2805 PROIA, WALTER & KAREN 6152 PARLIAMENT WASHINGTOM, MI 48095---0 PUEMTE, JAHAZIEL & ETHLIN 489 20TH AVE NE MAPLES, FL 34120---0 R & M FARMS LLC PO BOX 8539 MAPLES, FL 34101---8539 RAHMAN PROPERTY GROUP LLC 13056 VALEWOOD DR MAPLES, FL 34119---8577 �- PIERRE, ROSITA B DIHILIA PIERRE 2860 ORANGE GROVE TRL MAPLES, FL 34120---7513 PLAMONDON, CAROL ANN 330 24TH AVE NE MAPLES, FL 34120---2333 POGAN, CHARLES B 2660 6TH ST NW MAPLES, FL 34120---1305 POSEY, JIM & DEONNE 1010 24TH AVE NE MAPLES, FL 34120---0 PRICE, LUZ ANGELA 2570 2ND ST NW MAPLES, FL 34120---4304 PROENZA, WALFRIDO 2655 4TH ST N E MAPLES, FL 34120---1319 PRYOR, THOMAS W & TINA M 30402NDSTNE MAPLES, FL 34120---1332 QUALITY HOMES INVESTMENTS INC 3211 10TH AVE NE MAPLES, FL 34120---0 R&M FARMS LLC PO BOX 8539 MAPLES, FL 34101---8539 RAH MAN PROPERTY GROUP LLC 13056 VALEWOOD DR MAPLES, FL 34119---8577 RAJ U, M U RALI & DALI LA 1035 DEVEREUX CHASE ROSWELL, GA 30075---0 RAMIREZ, BARBARA J 2971 WILSON BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120---0 RAMIREZ, JOSE &NEYSI 460 24TH AVE N E NAPLES, FL 34120---2388 RAMIREZ, JUAN & ELVIA H 165 22ND AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 RAMIREZ, PEDRO R ZORRILLA 2905 WILSON BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120---0 RAMOS JR, MILCIADES ERICKA ALVAREZ 2252 VALENCIA LAKES CIR NAPLES, FL 34120---7498 RAMOS, LENNELL GALLEGOS 14020 CARLTON DRIVE DAVIE, FL 33330---0 RAMOS, MARIA J 2925 4TH ST NW NAPLES, FL 34120---1316 RANDALL BOULEVARD LAND TRUST %SARAN TAMZEN GRANT, TR 15890 LYONS VALLEY RD JAMUL, CA 91935---0 RANDALL BOULEVARD LAND TRUST %SARAN TAMZEN GRANT, TR 15890 LYONS VALLEY RD JAMUL, CA 91935---0 RAKES, DARRIN &MARIA 28202NDSTNE NAPLES, FL 34120---1832 RAMIREZ, I RAI DA IDANIA S HERRERA VICTOR RAMIREZ 2994 WILSON BLVDN NAPLES, FL 34120---0 RAMIREZ, DOSE R &NEYSI 460 24TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---2388 RAMIREZ, LEIMYS MANUEL ALEJANDRO BENITEZ 3041 2ND ST NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 RAMIREZ, YSEL DEL CARMEN RAUL REYES 2921 WILSON BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120---2350 RAMOS, EDUARDO 3845 15TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34117---0 RAMOS, LENNELL GALLEGOS 14020 CARLTON DRIVE DAVI E, FL 33330---0 RAMSEY, MICHAEL R 26314TH ST NW NAPLES, FL 34120---1306 RANDALL BOULEVARD LAND TRUST %SARAN TAMZEN GRANT, TR 15890 LYONS VALLEY RD JAMUL, CA 91935---0 RANDALL BOULEVARD LAND TRUST %SARAN TAMZEN GRANT, TR 15890 LYONS VALLEY RD JAMUL, CA 91935---0 i � � I �, i I� RAMIREZ RAYMUNDO, MIGUEL MARIA LILIANA VEGA PADRON 1880 8TH ST N E NAPLES, FL 34120---0 RAMIREZ, JASON DAVID MORALES JUAN CARLOS CANIZALEZ 281 20TH AVE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 RAMIREZ, JUAN $c ELVIA 165 22ND AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 RAMIREZ, NEYSI & JOSE R 460 24TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---2388 RAMOS JR, ABEL & TAMMY E 2881 I N LET COVE LN W NAPLES, FL 34120---0 RAMOS, KERI &MICHAEL 3040 2ND ST NW NAPLES, FL 34120---0 RAMOS, LUIS C & MARYORIE 485 20TH AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34120---237$ RANDALL BOULEVARD LAND TRUST %SARAN TAMZEN GRANT, TR 15890 LYONS VALLEY RD JAMUL, CA 91935---0 RANDALL BOULEVARD LAND TRUST %SARAN TAMZEN GRANT, TR 15890 LYONS VALLEY RD JAMUL, CA 91935---0 RANDALL BOULEVARD LAND TRUST %SARAN TAMZEN GRANT, TR 15890 LYONS VALLEY RD JAMUL, CA 91935---0 J RANDALL BOULEVARD LAND TRUST %SARAN TAMZEN GRANT, TR 15890 LYONS VALLEY RD JAMUL, CA 91935---0 RANDOLPH, REBECCA LYNN KYLE OLIVER MILTON RANDOLPH ROBYN BLAIRE RANDOLPH 25812NDSTNE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 RCDG PARTNERS LLC ' 6728 JAMESTOWN DR ALPHARETTA, GA 3Q005---0 i RCDG PARTNERS LLC 6728 JAMESTOWN DR ALPHARETT'A, GA 30005---Q RCDG PARTNERS LLC 6728 JAMESTOWN DR ALPHARETTA, GA 30005---0 REBELE JR, RICHARD A & LISA M 535 22ND AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34120---2324 REID, GARY SUSAN R CHIAPPONE 3070 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---1448 REISIG, MICHAEL A &TERESA 3091 WILSON BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120---1344 RENGIFO, DIEGO F ROSA M NOLASCO 7754 BUCKS RUN DR NAPLES, FL 34120---0 RESTREPO, MARIA DEL CARMEN E JUAN CARLOS RESTREPO ' 2870 I N LET COVE LANE W NAPLES, FL 34120---0 j �� '� � RANDALL BOULEVARD TRUST %SARAN TAMZEN GRANT, TR 15890 LYONS VALLEY RD JAMUL, CA 91935---0 RAYMER, VINCENT 30 25TH AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34120---1308 RCDG PARTNERS LLC 6728 JAMESTOWN DR ALPHARETTA, GA 30005---0 RCDG PARTNERS LLC 6728 JAMESTOWN DR ALPHARETTA, GA 30005---0 RCDG PARTNERS LLC 6728 JAMESTOWN DR ALPHARETTA, GA 30005---0 i REED, MATTHEW T &ASHLEY N 2884 BLOSSOM CT NAPLES, FL 34120---7528 REISIG, MICHAEL &TERESA 3091 WILSON BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120---1344 REITES, ADAM &ASHLEY 110 24TH AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34120---0 � RENTERIA, MARIA E 28122NDSTNW NAPLES, FL 34120---0 REXACH, GREGORY & LILLIAN 390 22ND AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---2379 RANDALL, RICHARD M CLAU D I N E E RAN DALL 531 22ND AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---2332 RCDG PARTNERS LLC 6728 JAMESTOWN DR ALPHARETTA, GA 30005---0 RCDG PARTNERS LLC 6728 JAMESTOWN DR ALPHARETTA, GA 30005---0 RCDG PARTNERS LLC 6728 JAMESTOWN DR ALPHARETTA, GA 30005---0 RCDG PARTNERS LLC 6728 JAMESTOWN DR ALPHARETTA, GA 30005---0 REGNIER, VANESSA E 3070 2ND ST NW NAPLES, FL 34120---0 REISIG, MICHAEL A TERESA M AASEN 3091 WILSON BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120---1344 RENAN, JAN & ROBERTA M 209 PICKWICK RD HAVERTON, PA 19083---0 RESTREPO, LUIS 2889 INLET COVE LN W NAPLES, FL 34120---0 REYES, GERARDO A & XIOMARA 2581 WILSON BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120---2348 RICE, WILLIAM C & CAROLYN � RICHARD &JEAN BAKER LIV TRUST 1940 WILSON BLVD N � 510 24TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---3371 NAPLES, FL 34120---2361 i RICHARD D BREWER TRUST i RICHARD G BOND TRUST 28714TH ST NE CHARMLEY A BOND TRUST NAPLES, FL 34120---1336 � 480 24TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 i RICHARZ, MARK EDWARD i RINKER, DAVID JAMES CATHERINE ANN RICHARZ � j 583 18TH AVE NE 130 7TH ST NW NAPLES, FL 34120---0 NAPLES, FL 34120---0 RIVAS, RODOLFO SONIA FRANQUEZ 4013 LEAF R D SEBRING, FL 33875---0 ROBERTO BOLLT TR PO BOX 855 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34133---0 ROBERTO BOLLT TR PO BOX 855 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34133---0 � RODD, ERIC OLAV 2868 BLOSSOM CT NAPLES, FL 34120---0 � RODGER, CHRISTIAN ALYSSA RODGERS 3092 NE 4TH ST i NAPLES, FL 34120---0 RODRIGUEZ, ABEL 310 25TH AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34120---4367 RODRIGUEZ, ELIZABETH 21 W 45TH PL H IALEAH, FL 33012---4029 ��, l i� RIVERA REVOCABLE TRUST 2867 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---7514 ROBERTO BOLLT TR PO BOX 855 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34133---0 �,. �r ROBERTO BOLLT TR PO BOX 855 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34133---0 RODDIS, MICHAELT&NIKKI A 440 22ND AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34120---3360 RODGERS, JOE & MARGARET 27612NDSTNE NAPLES, FL 34120---1329 RODRIGUEZ, ANASTACIO CLEMENCIA BLANCO 1971 WILSON BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120---2575 RODRIGUEZ, ERIC DAVID MARIA BELEN ECHEVERRIA MELLO 2875 ORANGE GROVE TRAIL NAPLES, FL 34120---0 j ; RICHARD C NICHOLS REV TRUST 5825 COLLINS AVE #12G MIAMI BEACH, FL 33140---0 RICHARD, PEYTON MARIE 211 2ND AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34120---0 RITCHIE, OSWALD B & JOAN A 360 22ND AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---2379 ROATH, JAMES REGINALD LEAN LYN N ROATH 167 20TH AVE N E NAPLES, FL 34120---0 ROBERTO BOLLT TR PO BOX 855 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34133---0 ROBINSON, ISSELLE 2710 WILSON BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120---3351 RODDIS, MICHAEL T &NIKKI A 440 22ND AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34120---3360 RODRIGUEZ SR, JORGE LUIS JUANA C RODIGUEZ 3140 VALENCIA DR NAPLES, FL 34120---1400 RODRIGUEZ, ARTURO REFUGIO ZARAGOSA DE RODRIGUEZ 431 18TH AVE N E NAPLES, FL 34120---6309 RODRIGUEZ, ESTELITA 261 20TH AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34120---2376 i ;� RODRIGUEZ, JASON ELISA DEL RISCO 2822 INLET COVE LN W MAPLES, FL 34120---7559 RODRIGUEZ, PATRICIA E & FREDI 28872NDSTME MAPLES, FL 34120---p ROJAS, OCTAVIO L & CARIDAD M 363 25TH AVE NE MAPLES, FL 34120---1342 � ROMAK, ERIN K 4725 PINE RIDGE RD j MAPLES, FL 34119---0 �' i ROMERO, JOSUE &MARIA G 25814TH ST NW MAPLES, FL 34120---0 ROSA, BILL & ALDA L 1920 STH ST N E MAPLES, FL 34120---3479 ROTONDO, RAFFAELE & KRISTY M 2829 INLET COVE LN W MAPLES, FL 34120---0 ROUBICEK, ELENA PO BOX 990519 i � MAPLES, FL 34116---6066 RUE, ANGELA M 2168 GROVE DR MAPLES, FL 34120---7515 RUIZ JR, ROLANDO CHARNELLE LYNN RUIZ 2661 FISHTAIL PALM CT MAPLES, FL 34120---7567 �' iI j RODRIGUEZ, DOSE WALFRIDO &IRIS 690 20TH AVE NE MAPLES, FL 34120---2334 ROJAS, ANGEL 2828 AMBERWOOD LN MAPLES, FL 34120---7523 ROJAS, RONALD RUBIANO 27102NDSTSW MAPLES, FL 34120---0 ROMAN PEREDO, LUIS A 2976 4TH ST N E MAPLES, FL 34120---0 ROMERO, MICHEL FIGUEREDO DANELYS CORREA FLEITAS 560 18TH AVE NE MAPLES, FL 34120---0 ROSADO, LUIS A &MARIA G 243 22ND AVE NE MAPLES, FL 34120---2330 ROUBICEK, CARLOS PO BOX 990519 MAPLES, FL 34116---6066 RUBIO, JENNIFER KELLY ISABELLA LALUDENCIA RUBIO 23108TH STNE MAPLES, FL 34120---3487 RUFFOLO, FRANK & JEANNIE F 3240 S PRINCETON AVE CH I CAG 0, i L 60616---3614 RUIZ, AMANDA B & CARLOS A NESTOR FERNANDEZ 2949 ORANGE GROVE TRL MAPLES, FL 34120---0 RODRIGUEZ, JUAN A 4401 SW 89TH CT M IAM I, FL 33165---5929 ROJAS, CLAUDIA JOSE MARTINEZ 2779 ORANGE GROVE TRL MAPLES, FL 34120---7527 ROMAK, ERIN K 4725 PINE RIDGE RD MAPLES, FL 34119---0 ROMAN, LUZ E 131 24TH AVE NE MAPLES, FL 34120---2360 RONZIO, MARIA 8410 COUNTRY RD #106 FT MYERS, FL 33919---0 ROSARIO, SAMUEL GONZALEZ CONCEPCION MARCANO CUEVAS 2755 ORANGE GROVE TRL MAPLES, FL 34120---0 ROUBICEK, ELENA PO BOX 990519 MAPLES, FL 34116---6066 RUDD, ERIC G &SALLY A 2060 WILSON BLVD N MAPLES, FL 34120---2343 RUGANIS, SARA ELIZABETH 260 20TH AVE NE MAPLES, FL 34120---6307 RUPELLi, GREGORY & JODI L 66 BAY TERR STATEN ISLAND, NY 10306---0 RUTHERFORD, GEOFFREY ROY ANGIE MCCARTHY 960 22ND AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---3413 RYMER, REECE 482 24TH AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34120---0 � SALAS, ALAIRTON MENDEZ '; ROSMERY V ZELDA VILLAROEL 2102 COUNTRY CLUB BLVD CAPE CORAL, FL 33990---0 i SALMA HOLDINGS INC �� 2231 DEL PRADO BLVD CAPE CORAL, FL 33990---0 i �� � SANCHEZ, ANDREW DAVID 511 20TH AVE N E '� NAPLES, FL 34120---3372 f - _ _ _, ,�� SANDUSKY, KAREN A 2799 AMBERWOOD CT NAPLES, FL 34120---7520 SANTOS, CARMEN L 2530 4TH ST N W NAPLES, FL 34120---1312 SAVAGE SR, DANA & MARLANE A 60 25TH AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34120---1308 SCHOLTEN, LAWRENCE-RICHARD S 3060 WILSON BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120---1343 SCHULZE, CAROL 2176 RUSTY FIG CT NAPLES, FL 34120---7519 i i i RYAN, PATRICIA L 2691 WILSON BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120---Q S C & A K HALSTED LIVING TRUST 441 JUNG BLVD E NAPLES, FL 34120---0 SALT B, MAG DY M DALIA G ABDELMALEK 2668 FISHTAIL PALM CT NAPLES, FL 34120---0 SANCHEZ IV, ADAM &JEWELS 101520THAVENE NAPLES, �FL 34120---3402 SANCHEZ, LILYANN YASMIN 330 20TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---2319 SANDUSKY, MICHAEL G & BARBARA 2786 AMBERWOOD CT NAPLES, FL 34120---7520 SARNO, GIOVANNA MICHELINA SARNO 2250 GROVE DR NAPLES, FL 34120---0 SAX &JAll 180 22ND AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34120---3306 SCHOMBURG, MONIKA M ANDREAS H & MONIKA C SHOMBURG 2258 GROVE DR NAPLES, FL 34120---0 SCHUMACHER,JOHN M 6817 PAIUTE DR EDINA, MN 55439---1032 i i RYAN, PATRICIA L 2691 WILSON BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120---Q S C & A K HALSTED LIVING TRUST 441 JUNG BLVD E NAPLES, FL 34120---0 SALT B, MAG DY M DALIA G ABDELMALEK 2668 FISHTAIL PALM CT NAPLES, FL 34120---0 SANCHEZ IV, ADAM &JEWELS 101520THAVENE NAPLES, �FL 34120---3402 SANCHEZ, LILYANN YASMIN 330 20TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---2319 SANDUSKY, MICHAEL G & BARBARA 2786 AMBERWOOD CT NAPLES, FL 34120---7520 SARNO, GIOVANNA MICHELINA SARNO 2250 GROVE DR NAPLES, FL 34120---0 SAX &JAll 180 22ND AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34120---3306 SCHOMBURG, MONIKA M ANDREAS H & MONIKA C SHOMBURG 2258 GROVE DR NAPLES, FL 34120---0 SCHUMACHER,JOHN M 6817 PAIUTE DR EDINA, MN 55439---1032 RYAN, PATRICIA L 2691 WILSON BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120---Q S C & A K HALSTED LIVING TRUST 441 JUNG BLVD E NAPLES, FL 34120---0 SALT B, MAG DY M DALIA G ABDELMALEK 2668 FISHTAIL PALM CT NAPLES, FL 34120---0 SANCHEZ IV, ADAM &JEWELS 101520THAVENE NAPLES, �FL 34120---3402 SANCHEZ, LILYANN YASMIN 330 20TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---2319 SANDUSKY, MICHAEL G & BARBARA 2786 AMBERWOOD CT NAPLES, FL 34120---7520 SARNO, GIOVANNA MICHELINA SARNO 2250 GROVE DR NAPLES, FL 34120---0 SAX &JAll 180 22ND AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34120---3306 SCHOMBURG, MONIKA M ANDREAS H & MONIKA C SHOMBURG 2258 GROVE DR NAPLES, FL 34120---0 SCHUMACHER,JOHN M 6817 PAIUTE DR EDINA, MN 55439---1032 • . RYMAN, KATHLEEN M 2940 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---7494 SADRI, ALI 2895 ORANGE GROVE TRAIL NAPLES, FL 34120---0 SALLY, CHRISTINA L JONATHON M SALLY 513 JUNG BLVD E NAPLES, FL 34120---0 SANCHEZ, ANDREW D 511 20TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---3372 SANCHO, RICARDO ARRIAGA 1860 WILSON BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120---2341 �,_ _ - -- - SANTISTEBAN, VICTOR SILVA ANGELICA DEL MAR 1409 NE 10TH TERRACE CAPE CORAL, FL 33909---0 SAUNDERS, DAMES & LINDA 2722 INLET COVE LN W NAPLES, FL 34120---7543 SCHNEIDER, KAREN A 361 22ND AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34120---0 SCHOTT, DALE D 26614TH ST NW NAPLES, FL 34120---1306 SCHWEGEL, KATHLEEN M 2780 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---7526 SCOTT, STEPHEN ANTHONY RACH EL MARIA SCOTT 220 24TH AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34120---0 SEVEREYN, ENRIQUE & HEIDI 311 22ND AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---2380 SHEPHERD, WENDY 2330 WILSON BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120---0 SHREWSBERRY, KURTIS J COURTNEY M SHREWSBERRY 632 18TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 SILVA, JOSUE D & LEICY 246148TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 SILVA, JUAN C & ONDINA P 2380 8TH ST N E NAPLES, FL 34120---3487 SIMPSON, MICHAEL E DENNIS T SIMPSON PO BOX 3 CLAY CITY, I N 47841---0 SIROK, MARK JASEN & AAMIEE N 2773 I N LET COVE LN W NAPLES, FL 34120---7548 SLETTEN, NICOLE J 3020 ORANGE GROVE TRAIL NAPLES, FL 34120---0 SMITH, BRADLY W & BRENDA L 2641 2ND ST NW NAPLES, FL 34120---1389 _\ _ SEGURA, ARCADIO & NIDIA 4500 NW 192ND.ST MIAMI GARDENS, FL 33055---2124 SHAMSESFAHANi, MOHAMMAD REZA WINSOME TAPPER DONNA MARIE TAPPER $11 8TH ST N E NAPLES, FL 34120---0 SH ERAN, AIXA J 371 BURNT PINE DR NAPLES, FL 34119---9775 SICILIANO, PHYLLIS F 2856 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---7513 SILVA, JUAN C & ONDINA 2380 8TH ST N E NAPLES, FL 34120---0 SILVA, NILMA 16691 SW 205TH AVE MIAMI, FL 33187---1084 SINGLETARY SR, CHARLES K CATHERINE SINGLETARY 2690 WILSON BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120---3302 SITLANI TRUST 1913 SAN ANTONIO AVE BERKELEY, CA 94707---1619 SMALL, HERBERT V & ELLEN 3030 WILSON BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120---1343 SMITH, JORDAN & HANNAH 2642 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---0 J �� �� i SEPANSKi, THOMAS GERARD THOMAS GERARD SEPANSKI II 2620 2ND ST NE NAPLES, FL 34105---0 SHELFORD, JEREMY & LEANN 2472 6TH ST NW NAPLES, FL 34120---0 SHIELDS, PATTY LOU &JAMES 2794 AMBERWOOD CT NAPLES, FL 34120---7520 SILANG, NOEL�J & CECILIA Y 2679 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---7562 SILVA,JUAN C&ONDINA 2380 8TH ST N E NAPLES, FL 34120---3487 SIMPSON, JAMES D & CARLA K 720 CHERRY BLOSSOM CT NAPLES, FL 34120---0 SIROK, MARK D & MELISSA M 2822 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---0 SKOL i LLC 1791 GORDON RIVER LANE NAPLES, FL 34104---0 SMARAN DACH E, I LI E 700 MEYER DR NAPLES, FL 34120---0 SMITH, LINDA I< 2220 8TH ST N E NAPLES, FL 34120---3435 SMITH, LI N DA K 2220 8TH ST NE NAPLES, FL 34120- 3435 SMITH, MICHAEL & SHARRON 2793 INLET COVE LN W NAPLES, FL 34120- 7550 SOLIS, FRANKLIN JESUS CHAVEZ MARIELLA ELIANA FLORES 2796 BERGAMOT LN NAPLES, FL 34120- 0 SON TRUONG &KIMCUC NGUYEN REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST 570 22ND AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 SOSA, YOLAINE YOVANI SOSA HERRERA ALINA SOSA HERRERA 690 22ND AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120- 3305 SPENCER, BRIAN RACHEL EDWARDS 2926 INLET COVE LN E NAPLES, FL 34120---0 ST CYR,TRACY 571 24TH AVE N E NAPLES, FL 34120- 2362 STEG, PAU L 321 20TH AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34120- 6324 STEPHENS, KERRY E NAOMI R STEPHENS BENJAIVIIN KRICK JR 360 18TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120- 0 STOLLE, RONALD G &ROSE F 17 SABRINA CT HOLMES, NY 12531---0 ; i ; 1, 1 � i I i i SMITH, LI N DA KAY 2220 8TH ST NE NAPLES, FL 34120---3435 SMITH, TAMMY L 375 20TH AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34120- 6324 SOLORZANO, LUIS 2335 WILSON BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120---0 SON TRUONG &KIMCUC NGUYEN REVOCABLE TRUST 570 22ND AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 SOUTHARD, DAVID C I<ATHERINE W SOUTHARD 2611 2ND STREET NW NAPLES, FL 34120---0 SPINUZZI, PATRICK 2020 WILSON BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120---2343 STANLEY, LARRY WAYNE RUTH ANN STANLEY 491 18TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120- 0 STELZER, PETER & BRENDA 2768 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120- 7526 STERN, NEILS 2308 WILSON BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120---2345 STOUMBAUGH, RYAN J 561 20TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 1 � SMITH, LISA MICHELLE &TIMOTHY 2636 CITRUS KEY LIME CT NAPLES, FL 34120- 0 SOLER, JAIRO & YVONNE 430 22ND AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---2331 SOLTAN, DANIEL ANTHONY JACQUELINE GAYLE SOLTAN 681 20TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 SORIANO, ROGER & LYDIA 2231 WILSON BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120- 2346 SOUTHEE, SASHA 12185 NA I ALIES COVE RD COOPER CITY, FL 33330---0 SPURGEON, SHANE & JODY 2703 ORANGE GROVE I NAPLES, FL 34120---7527 STARK, NATALI E A 204 SOUTH PAFFRATH SPRINGFIELD, MN 56087---0 STEPHEN H PEEPLES REV TRUST 200 SE TWIG AVE PORT SAINT LUCIE, FL 34983- 3139 STMARC, SAINTAMISE 2170 WILSON BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120---0 STRONG, BRANDON L &SARAN 2900 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---7510 STUPAK, IRINA 7710 ATRON AVE W EST H I LLS, CA 91304---0 SUDANO, MATALIE 2851 ORANGE GROVE TRL MAPLES, FL 34120---7514 SUSAN ANN POHLMANN TRUST 629 BRIDGEWAY LN MAPLES, FL 34108---2778 SWANSON, CARTER &LAMA 2853 INLET COVE LM W MAPLES, FL 34120---7569 SYLVESTER, DONNA M KEATING 2746 I N LET COVE LN W MAPLES, FL 34120---0 SZCZEPKOWSKi, JENNIFER L L 3030 4TH ST N E MAPLES, FL 34120---1863 TACCONE, CHRISTOPHER &HEATHER 231 22ND AVE NW MAPLES, FL 34120---3363 TANNASSEE, KENNETH R BARBARA R CORNEAL PO BOX 10506 MAPLES, FL 34101---0 TEAMMAC00 REALTY LLC 14644 BEAUFORT CIRCLE MAPLES, FL 34119---0 THEMEL, JOHN W 2910 4TH ST N E MAPLES, FL 34120---0 i ,I j i i SUAREZ, YUNIEL FERRO LEONOR RIVAS LIMONTA 281 20TH AVE NE MAPLES, FL 34120---0 SUNQUIST, LAWRENCE B ROSALIND LONG SUNQUIST 9656 S FRANCISCO AVE EVERGREEN PARK, IL 60805---2710 SUSAN D ASHBROOK REV TRUST 2227 GROVE DR MAPLES, FL 34120---0 SWIFT, BRIAN ANNE HOOYER 1708 4TH AVE SE SIOUX CENTER, IA 51250---0 SYNERGY INVEST LLC 5934 PREMIER WAY UNIT 2162 MAPLES, FL 34109---0 SZCZEPKOWSKI, WILLIAM & KAREN 220 2STH AVE NW MAPLES, FL 34120---0 TALARICO, JEFFREY SCOTT LYNN MARIE TALARICO 2810 I N LET COVE LN W MAPLES, FL 34120---7559 TARTJR, DAVID & KAROL 490 18TH AVE NE MAPLES, FL 34120---0 TEJADA, SONIA M 2571 WILSON BLVD N MAPLES, FL 34120---2348 THEMEL, JOHN W 2910 4TH ST N E MAPLES, FL 34120---0 .� ; i _' SUDANO, BRIAN & RACHEAL L 2821 AMBERWOOD LN MAPLES, FL 34120---7522 SURBER, CHRISTOPHER D CHRISTINA JENNIFER SURBER 2162 RUSTY FIG CT MAPLES, FL 34120---0 SUYI, YAMIRKA JORGE CACERES 121 20TH AVE N E MAPLES, FL 34120---0 SYLVA EST, IRENE RAFAEL ROSAS 14120TH AVE NE MAPLES, FL 34120---2318 SZALAY, I<ARIN A 360 24TH AVE NW MAPLES, FL 34120---0 TABORA, SEMIA 570 24TH AVE NE MAPLES, FL 34120---2361 TALLEY, GARY D 250 22ND AVE NW MAPLES, FL 34120---3337 TASSONI, MICHAEL KRISTEN LABUZIENSKI 2624 ORANGE GROVE TRL MAPLES, FL 34120---7561 TELLECHEA, DANIEL YVETTE TELLECHEA 2260 VALENCIA LAI<ES CI R MAPLES, FL 34120---0 THEMEL, JOHN W 2910 4TH ST N E MAPLES, FL 34120---0 THEODORE & LINDSAY FITZPATRICK REVOABLE TRUST 2636 ORANGE GROVE TRAIL NAPLES, FL 34120---0 THOMPSON, CAROL 1025 24TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 TICE, ALEXANDER G CHRISTOPHER R TACCON.E 621 24TH AVENUE NE NAPLES, FL 34120- 0 TOBY USA LLC 11925 COLLIER BLVD #101 NAPLES, FL 34116---0 TOLEDO GRANITE INTERNAT INC 1892 TRADE CENTER WAY NAPLES, FL 34109---0 TOMPKINS, JORDAN N 2265 VALENCIA LAKES CIR NAPLES, FL 34120---0 TORRES JR, WILLIAM 2275 WILSON BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120- 2346 TOSCANO, ALBA MELISSA PEREZ 27551 SHRIVER AVE BONITS SPRINGS, FL 34135- 0 TOWNSEND, MAUREEN C 420 20TH AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34120- 0 TRAN, RICHARD M ASHLEY KHONG 359 WOBURN ST LOWELL, MA 01852---0 i THERIAULT, TRACY LAUREN 1549 SANDPIPER ST #39 NAPLES, FL 34102- 0 THOMPSON, GORDON E & NIEVES 2241 VALENCIA LAKES CIR NAPLES, FL 34120- 7499 TIGER, WILLIAM & LINDA 130 18TH AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34120- 0 TODD, CHRISTOPHER 2797 AMBERWOOD LN NAPLES, FL 34120- 7522 TOLEDO, THIAGO 25211 PINSON DR BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135---0 TORIBIO-MERAN, ESTELA 165 JUNG BLVD W NAPLES, FL 34120- 3346 TORRES, CARLOS G ANA KOCH 2777 INLET COVE LN W NAPLES, FL 34120- 7548 TOSTE, GREISY ROGNY RODRIGUEZ 2799 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120- 0 TRAN, HA 407 PINEWOOD DR OLDSMAR, FL 34677- 0 TRINITY ENTRPRS HOLDINGS INC 1000 PINEBROOK RD VENICE, FL 34285- o it I I THOMAS, KRISTEN INEZ KRISTOFER THOMAS 2648 FISHTAIL PALM CT FL 34120- 7567 NAPLES, THRUSHMAN, STELLA 2811 2ND ST NW NAPLES, FL 34120- 1393 TISCHLER, JEROLD & LINDA 220 20TH AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34120- 2375 TOLBERT, CHRISTINA 140 20TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120- 0 TOM BROCCOLO'S CSTM HOMES INC 3110 2ND STREET NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 TORIBO, RAFAEL E ALEXANDRA M TORIBO 95 JUNG BLVD E NAPLES, FL 34120- 6335 TORRES, JORGE CHRISTINE CASIERI TORRES 2806 INLET COVE LN W NAPLES, FL 34120---7559 TOUSIGNANT, ARIC H & CANDICE N 26102ND STNW NAPLES, FL 34120- 0 TRAN, HENRY VAN LAM 2800 BERGAMOT LN NAPLES, FL 34120---0 TRUJILLO, OMAR ALEXANDER CALLIE ANN MARIE TRUJILLO 106 18TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 UNDERWOOD JR, BOYD H & LUZ E 180 18TH AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34120---2353 URIKA OIL INC 384 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120---3325 VALDEZ, DAVID A VICTORIA HAYDEE VALDEZ 2855 B LOSSSO M CT NAPLES, FL 34120---0 VALENCIA LAKES AT ORANGETREE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC 1010NE9THST CAPE CORAL, FL 33909---0 � VALENCIA LAKES AT ORANGETREE i HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC � 1010 N E 9TH ST CAPE CORAL, FL 33909---0 VALENCIA LAKES AT ORANGETREE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC 1010NE9THST CAPE CORAL, FL 33909---0 VALLE, MARTHA L MARTHA R H ERRERA RODOLFO HERRERA 2730 2ND ST NE NAPLES, FL 34120---1328 VAN HOUTEN, SEAN 370 22ND AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34120---2321 VARGO, PETER T & BEVERLY A 391 22ND AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34120---2322 VEGA, MARVIN & JOANNE 2925 I N LET COVE LN E NAPLES, FL 34120---7507 �� i � �� UNSWORTH, PAUL J 2888 BLOSSOM CT NAPLES, FL 34120---7528 �1RIKA OIL INC 384 RANDALL BLVD UNIT 3 NAPLES, FL 34120---3325 VALDEZ, URBANO REYES IDELSI ALFONSO MOYA 3308 LISA LANE 4 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 VALENCIA LAKES AT ORANGETREE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC 1010NE9THST CAPE CORAL, FL 33909---0 VALENCIA LAKES AT ORANGETREE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC 1010NE9THST CAPE CORAL, FL 33909---0 VALENCIA LAKES AT ORANGETREE HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION INC 1010NE9THST CAPE CORAL, FL 33909---0 VALME, MERCILIA 2645 FISHTAIL PALM CT NAPLES, FL 34120---0 VAN SLYKE, JOSHUA J &ERICA J 540 22ND AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---3304 VATCKY JR, CHARLES H 25614TH ST NW NAPLES, FL 34120---1361 VELASCO, ALBERTO MARTHA C ROJAS-ROMERO VELASCO 240 20TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---6307 UNZ, ERICA RENEE 2730 6TH ST NW NAPLES, FL 34120---0 UZCATEGUI, LEONARDO A LISA M UZCATEG U I 2830 0 RANG E G ROVE TRAI L NAPLES, FL 34120---7524 VALENCIA LAKES AT ORANGETREE 1010NE9THST CAPE CORAL, FL 33909---0 VALENCIA LAKES AT ORANGETREE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC 1010NE9THST CAPE CORAL, FL 33909---0 VALENCIA LAKES AT ORANGETREE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC 1010NE9THST CAPE CORAL, FL 33909---0 VALEUS, ANDRE MARIE L VALEUS SYLICE 2873 I N LET COVE LN W NAPLES, FL 34120---7569 VAN DEN BERG, GERT JOHANNES BEATRICE MANEA 723 110TH AVE N NAPLES, FL 34108---0 VANDER KLOOSTER, MATTHEW DAWN KATHLEEN VANDER KLOOSTER 11 ZEBULON PLACE PALM COAST, FL 32164---0 VCC PROPERTIES LLC %NAPLES TRUST PROPERTY MGMT 6300 TRAIL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34108---0 VELEZ, HUGO 11562 SW 126TH TER MIAMI, FL 33176---4444 VELIZ, JORGE HERNANDEZ L(LIANA PEREZ 160 22ND AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 VIELE II, DONALD L &HEATHER L 4412 LYNHURST RD SPRINGFIELD, IL 62711---7130 VIJUNGCO, DOSE G & HERMINIA D 1162 AUGUSTA FALLS WAY � NAPLES, FL 34119---0 VO, SAU V BEBAT NGUYEN N HAN H VO PHUONGTHAO T NGUYEN 3120 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---0 WAGNER, VICKIE 5760 AUTUMN OAKS LN NAPLES, FL 34119---1124 WALKER TR, G IA TH I G T WALKER REV/TRUST 6-7-94 105 13TH ST S BRADENTON BEACH, FL 34217---0 i WALL, CHANDA 740 CHERRY BLOSSOM CT NAPLES, FL 34120---0 WALLACE, J U LI E 2919 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---0 WANG, MOQIN 7845 BRISTOL CIR NAPLES, FL 34120---0 WARREN, ROBERT EDWARD TERRY LYNN WARREN 91 18TH AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34120---2766 VIANA, JORGE L & ANA S 4171 NW 62ND DR COCONUT CREEK, FL 33073---2043 VIERA, PEDRO & ILEANA 1118 ERASER PINE BLVD SARASOTA, FL 34240---0 VILLAGE OF LIFE LLC 4520 FAIRLOOP RUN LEHIGH ACRES, FL 33973---0 VOGT, PAU L T & TAMARA M 2775 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---7527 WALIGORA, BRUCE C HEATHER MARIE WALIGORA 3160 4TH ST N E NAPLES, FL 34120---0 _. WALKER, AARON E & TAMERA 11551 AERIE LN NAPLES, FL 34120---0 WALLACE JR, WILLIAM S 3071 2ND ST NW NAPLES, FL 34120---1350 WALSH, BONNIE 2400 OIL WELL RD NAPLES, FL 34120---0 WARD, MICHAEL D &PENNY 25721 FRITH ST LAND 0 LAKES, FL 34639---5683 WASHINGTON COUNTY INVESTS LLC 1021E 4TH ST AKRON, CO 80720---0 ,- i ,, i i VICTOR G VALDES FAMILY TRUST 211 2ND ST NW APT 701 ROCH ESTER, M N 55901---0 VIGIL, RAFAEL & JOAN F 5775 SE 123RD AVE MIAMI, FL 33183---0 VLAHAKIS, EVANGELOS & SANDRA A 2675 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---0 WAGNER, DAWN EDNA 240 S BROADWAY APT 5 REDONDO BEACH, CA 90277---3356 WALIGORA, ERIC H 2649 FISHTAIL PALM CT NAPLES, FL 34120---7567 WALKER, WISE L JANNETT P MARLOW WALKER 1010 22ND AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 WALLACE, J OAN N E M 3091 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---1494 WALTERS SCOTT A & DEBRA L 2933 I N LET COVE LN E NAPLES, FL 34120---7507 WARREN, BETTY A 2929 INLET COVE LN E NAPLES, FL 34120---0 WAYNE, DUKE 2641 2ND ST NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 WEBER, VEIL &SHERRY 120NE20THAVE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 WESTMAN, STEPHANIE RICARDO GOMEZ 321 18TH AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34120---2326 WHITTINGHAM, EDWARD 510 20TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---2539 WILLIAMS, MARK E & ERIKA E 1830 WILSON BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120---0 WOHLBERG, CHRISTOPHER JON MARITZA WOHLBERG 2482 8TH ST N E NAPLES, FL 34120---0 WRIGHT, CLARA AMANDA SHANE 2855 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---7514 � YOUNG EST, ROBERT A 377 20TH AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34120---6324 ZAPATA, GLIDARDO D & BIBIANA 2217 VALENCIA LAKES CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34120---7499 ZDINAK SR, MICHAEL & JANICE i 2731 ORANGE GROVE TRL i NAPLES, FL 34120---0 ZHIVANAJ, MONICA 2938 INLET COVE LN E NAPLES, FL 34120---0 WEST REVOCABLE TRUST 2213 VALENCIA LAKES CIR NAPLES, FL 34120---7499 WESTON, SUNDAI C 2831 2ND ST NW NAPLES, FL 34120---0 WILLIAMS, COLIN P VIRGINIA KOPROWSKI 380 24TH AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34120---0 WILLIAMS, MILDRED &PETER C 2869 I N LET COVE LN W NAPLES, FL 34120---7569 ._ � WOLFE, DAVID E & CYNTHIA 50 25TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---1387 WU, JIAN WEI 2877 I N LET COVE LN W NAPLES, FL 34120---7569 ZAJAS, DAMES M & TARA L 2835 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---7514 ZAVALA GONZALEZ, FERNANDO MARIA DEL CARMEN ALVAREZ LOPEZ FRANCISCO ZAVALA CORONA 2826 2ND ST NW NAPLES, FL 34120---Q ZEBALLOS, JEAN CARIA F RUIZ 340 20TH AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34117---0 CARLI N, GRANT A 830 EASTLAW N WINDSOR N8S 3H7 CANADA WE5TMAN, CARL E & CAROLYN J 331 18TH AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34120---0 W H ITN EY, MARLIN &GALE 2650 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---7561 WILLIAMS, JEAN 2632 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---7561 WILSON, ROBERT C & MARY C 26 TWINBROOK CT RAMSEY, NJ 07446---0 WONG, PHILLIP SH ERRY T WONG CH EN 420 22ND AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 XIONG, YUTING 423 STANWICH RD GREENWICH, CT 06830---0 ZAMARRON, PHILLIP) &REBECCA 800 GRAND RAPIDS BLVD NAPLES, FL � 34120---0 ZAWODNY, PATRICIA A 2735 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---7527 ZERPA, EDWIN A & ALICE 2742 ORANGE GROVE TRL NAPLES, FL 34120---0 HUDON, JACCZUES XIN GAO 7-575 OLD ST PATR I CK OTTAWA K1N 9H5 CANADA '� i KALB, HAMS PETER CARRERA 39 #12 SUR 110 APTO 601 MEDELLIN COLOMBIA MENDOZA, DAVID SORUCO CALLE GUILLERMO RIVERO 63 SANTA CRUZ BOLIVIA SCHREY, DANIEL SIEMENSST 5A 33397 RIETBERG GERMANY WATSON, RICHARD & CATHERINE 5 DUVAL DR BARRIE L4M 6V2 CANADA XU, ZHONG TI NG LAN ZH U 118 CHANCERY CRESCENT ORLEANS I<4A 4N3 CANADA Citrus Greens at Orange Tree Owners Association, Inc. 1130 Grove Drive Naples, FL 34120 KHAIT, YURI & GALINA KLINKERT, LEONARD & NASHIHA 8 MARINUCCI CT HOGEWEG 46 C RICHMOND HILL L4C OM3 CANADA � ZANDVOORT 2042 GH NETHERLANDS PAVLIDIS, ILIAS &MARIA � PAVLIDIS, ITIAS &MARIA 56-58 IFIGENIAS ', I 56-58 1ST FIGENIAS ST i � ST KALLITH EA i �' 17672 KALLITH EA ATHENS 17672 GREECE �� � ATHENS GREECE i i SMITH ET AL, JENNIFER ANNE � SOUSA, CARLOS & DRUSIANA 9 MONSAL AVE � ARNOLD FERNANDES FERNDOWN � � MICHELLE ROULEAU i � DORSET BH22 $LA ENGLAND �, 93 STIRLING CRESCENT �' MARKHAM L3R 7J9 CANADA -� WERNER FAMILY TRUST XU INVESTMENTS LP ERRENSTRAS E 2 118 CHANCERY CRESENT H S 6 RASTENBERG D-99636 GERMANY OTTAWA K4A 4N3 CANADA . , i � Golden Gate Estates Area Civic Association, Inc. 2631 4'h Street NW Naples, FL 34120 Valencia Lakes Pro Association, Inc. 2223 Grove Drive Naples, FL 34120 -- I r �' perty Owners Project Team • Applicant: GM Advisors, LLC • Robert Mulhere, FAICP, Hole Montes, a Bowman Company • Norman Treb*11cock, AICP, PTOE, PE, Treb*11cock Consulting FA MEN MINLI • • ! �• • • ! • • •Alk Adh•• �• ! • • • •'•% • • JCc Fl we •,fi may" _ ir1-^-e dp of OF Fee Of 'IN Fl_, .S •�,j �(' r: �!•y( 'q proFif .a!'y�r- Fill i•a.r , c •Fee � `11 y; 410 ��File ' ti, : a V?F W % . r Ale Fitt!♦11 !► v r 4 + ?ill IF 1 AAA we IL feel ; ,►+a•! 1,y„• .+�1►apl"'•.i', r{-' ,�� ,h y • v �«t V +s y,VI �4 Fol AL j%R- 1M a .ti {i'rOFF. ,;r5,fr Jell OFF 00 4 IF e1- �4 4 _ �...A AL r • . "' OFF I+ At . rn rn o k a tee R IF t, ot _ b J"4F I Fee IF gFolPtie •� I ��OFF W OILr� ( OFF -24th RVE NE •ete '` �•`; f 4 `' •• 7OF I fi ' N Am Alk As AGRICULTURAURURAL DESIGNATION i t ESTATES DESIGNATION Rural Settlement Area District - LIMITS OF SU6JECT SITE SALE I4 IZCT EMONTES a Bowman company oni HOLEMONTES a Bowman company F� i ZONING: E-ST/W-4 LAND USE: UNDEVELOPED i LAND USE: SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ' GEC N ------ -- RJGHT INIRIGHT - - 'I I Q Lu ~ U 41 25.0' OUT ONLY 0 w a uJ � W z ww ZD z0 z og RETAINED NATIVE VEGETATION BUFFER ZONING: E-ST/W 3 LAND USE: SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TRACT C ' 1 (DEVELOPABLE AREA) TRACT B 50.0' RETAINED NATIVE VEGETATION BUFFER 15.0 ENHANCED TYPE D LBE ! it 76.0' it DRAINAGE EASEMENT ZONING: E-ST/1N-4 LAND USE: FUTURE COLLIER COUNTY STORM WATER MANAGEMENT LAKE aso+m �r DATE ■i! IMMOKALEE RANDALL °"' c.ic °"`4n023 OCt7[E➢ Or ME CPUD H.M. �noz3 LE MONTES KMnca Scat H e CWX_ scht ievmcm DATE As Noted -__- o GO 120 r \M Rp RO& 5%0 P 7 R 3100 O ZONING: E-STMl-4 (CU) LAND USE: NORTH COLLIER FIRE RESCUE DISTRICT STATION 10 5.0' TYPE A LBE 20.0' ACCESS TO COUNTY OWNED PARCEL FOR CANAL MAINT. l<< LAND USE SUMMARY (RETAINED NATIVE VEGETATION BUFFER} TRACT B 1.24 AC TRACT C 8.60 AC TOTAL 9.84 AC N11N. OPEN SPACE REQUIRED/PROVIDED (30%): 3.13 AC MIN. NATIVE VEGETATION RETENTION REQUIRED/PROVIDED: 0.88 AC TRACT B RETAINS NATIVE VEGETATION &SHALL PROVIDE THE REQUIRED MINIMUM NATIVE VEGETATION RETENTION OF 0.88 AC . MASTER PLAN r� o.nw�a Luc Nor aucwva No Eiuwra Na M/110� fA OO�Q111UC1101 ISKca •� °aO'r �23025 2023t]25MST FlIO.[C7 MO. fQ[T NO NOTES: 1. EXISTING NATIVE VEGETATION IN TRACT B MAY BE USED TO MEET REQUIRED LANDSCAPE BUFFERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH EXHIBIT F, DEVELOPER COMMITMENT 3.13. 2. RETAINED NATIVE VEGETATION WITHIN TRACT B MAY BE USED TO SATISFY THE PERIMETER LANDSCAPE BUFFER PLANTING REQUIREMENTS AFTER EXOTIC VEGETATION REMOVAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH LDC SEC. 4.06.02 & 4.06.05.E.1. SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTINGS UTILIZING NATIVE PLANT MATERIALS MAY BE REQUIRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LDC SECTION 3,05,07. TO ENSURE THAT 80% OPACITY IS ACHIEVED WITHIN ONE YEAR OF PLANTING. THE TYPE, SIZE & NUMBER OF SUCH PLANTINGS, IF NECESSARY, WILL BE DETERMINED AT TIME OF INITIAL SDP OR PLAT & INCLUDED ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR THE SDP OR PLAT. 3. UP TO 25°b OF THE WIDTH OF TRACT B MAY BE UTILIZED FOR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 4. MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: ZONED: 40' /ACTUAL: 47' 5. IF, AT THE TIME THE FIRST BUILDING PERMIT IS ISSUED. THE PROPERTY TO THE WEST IS NO LONGER ZONED FOR RESIDENTIAL USES A 10' TYPE A BUFFER LOCATED ON EITHER PARCEL OR SHARED WITH EACH ABUTTING PROPERTY CONTRIBUTING 5' SHALL BE PROVIDED. IMMOKALEE RANDALL CPUD urm+ DEVIATIONS: O DEVIATION 1 (BUFFER REQUIREMENTS) SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 4.06.02 - BUFFER REQUIREMENTS, TABLE 2.4, FOOTNOTE 3, WHICH STATES THAT "BUFFER AREAS BETWEEN COMMERCIAL OUTPARCELS LOCATED WITHIN A SHOPPING CENTER, BUSINESS PARK, OR SIMILAR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT MAY HAVE A SHARED [TYPE A] BUFFER 15 FEET WIDE WITH ABUTTING PROPERTY CONTRIBUTING 7.5 FEET' TO INSTEAD ALLOW A 10 FOOT WIDE TYPE A BUFFER, LOCATED ON EITHER PARCEL OR SHARED WITH EACH ABUTTING PROPERTY CONTRIBUTING 5 FEET, OCS.DVCD DY D•ft de.w e. art C.K 42023 OC1.7Q➢ D� OI1L H.M. 4/2023 1LR1�C41 SCALL KWOW&p� ;,CALL LOL-1 :,�Y: Y.rO AR�:3' t1g EXHIBIT C MASTER PLAN DAR 2023 02S MST 2 OF 2 7- mm%""�M educt All x Shopping Plaza 40k — 150k 1001000 SF 1 1 1 Total 61752 254 265 519 107 66 173 No Supermarket Pass -By 173 25 64 66 130 2499 27 16 43 Net New 61579 190 199 389 80 50 130 • The maximum total daily trip generation for the proposed development shah not exceed389 two-way PM peak hour net new trips. *4M HOLEMONTES