The URL can be used to link to this page

CCPC Agenda 03/07/2024COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Planning Commission AGENDA Board of County Commission Chambers Collier County Government Center 3299 Tamiami Trail East, 3rd Floor Naples, FL 34112 March 7, 2024 9: 00 AM Edwin Fryer- Chairman Joseph Schmitt, Environmental - Vice -Chair Paul Shea, Environmental - Secretary Christopher Vernon Robert Klucik, Jr. Randy Sparrazza Chuck Schumacher Amy Lockhart, Collier County School Board Note: Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes on any item. Individuals selected to speak on behalf of an organization or group are encouraged and may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item if so recognized by the chairman. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the CCPC agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 10 days prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the CCPC shall be submitted to the appropriate county staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All material used in presentations before the CCPC will become a permanent part of the record and will be available for presentation to the Board of County Commissioners if applicable. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the CCPC will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto, and therefore may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Collier County Planning Commission Page I Printed 31112024 March 2024 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call by Secretary 3. Addenda to the Agenda 4. Planning Commission Absences 5. Approval of Minutes A. 2/15/2024 CCPC Meeting Minutes 6. BCC Report - Recaps 7. Chairman's Report 8. Consent Agenda 9. Public Hearings A. Advertised PL20220003225 - GMPA - Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard Commercial Infill Subdistrict - An Ordinance of the Board Of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance No. 89-05, as amended, the Collier County Growth Management Plan for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, specifically amending the Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Map and map series by changing the designation of 2.4 acres of land from Urban Residential Subdistrict, Mixed Use District to Urban - Commercial District, Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard Commercial Infill District and amending the Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard Commercial Infill Subdistrict to add 100,000 square feet of gross floor area of indoor air-conditioned mini and self -storage warehouse (SIC Code 4225), and add select convenience retail and service uses including gas stations and car washes to the allowed 50,000 square feet of gross floor area of commercial uses. The subject property is located at the southeast intersection of Livingston Road and Veterans Memorial Boulevard in Section 13, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, consisting of 4.68E acres; and furthermore, directing transmittal of the adopted amendment to the Florida Department of Commerce; providing for severability and providing for an effective date. [Coordinator: Rachel Hansen, AICP, Planner III] (Companion Item PUDZ PL20220003226) Collier County Planning Commission Page 2 Printed 31112024 March 2024 2. PL20220003226 - CPUD - Livingston Veterans - An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, amending Ordinance Number 04-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which includes the Comprehensive Zoning Regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, by amending the appropriate Zoning Atlas Map of Maps by changing the zoning Classification of the herein described Real Property from the Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district and commercial professional and General Office District (C-1) zoning district, to the Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) zoning district for a project to be known as Livingston Veterans CPUD to allow up to 100,000 square feet of gross floor area of indoor air-conditioned mini- and self - storage warehouse (SIC Code 4225), and up to 50,000 square feet of gross floor area of commercial uses including gas stations and car washes. The property is located at the southeast intersection of Livingston Road and Veterans Memorial Boulevard in Section 13, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 4.68E acres; and by providing an effective date. [Coordinator: Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA, CSM, Planner III] (Companion Item PL20220003225) 3. PL20240000400 - GMPA 10-Year Water Supply - A Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners proposing an amendment to the Collier County Growth Management Plan, Ordinance 89-05, as amended, specifically amending the Potable Water Sub -Element of the Public Facilities Element to amend Policy 1.7 to reference the updated ten year water supply facilities work plan, and amending the Capital Improvement Element to change the level of service standards for county potable water systems and county sanitary sewer -wastewater treatment systems; furthermore directing transmittal of the amendment to the Florida Department of Commerce. [Coordinator James Sabo, AICP, Comprehensive Planning Manager] 4. PL20200002204 — GMPA — Emmanuel Lutheran Community Facilities and Service Subdistrict - An Ordinance of the Board Of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance No. 89-05, as amended, the Collier County Growth Management Plan for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, specifically amending the Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element and Rural Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map and Map Series to revise the Mission Subdistrict of the Mixed Use District, to add 14 acres to Subdistrict; to change the name of the subdistrict to Emmanuel Lutheran Church community Facilities and Services Subdistrict; to allow additional uses including Colleges and Universities, Social Service Uses, Government Uses, Medical Office, Physical Fitness Facilities, Food Trucks and Recreational Facilities on property consisting of 35.92E acres; and furthermore, directing transmittal of the adopted amendment to the Florida Department of Commerce; providing for severability and providing for an effective date. [Coordinator: Kathy Eastley, AICP, Planner III] (Companion Item PL20200002198) Collier County Planning Commission Page 3 Printed 31112024 March 2024 5. PL20200002198 - PUD - Emmanuel Lutheran Church Community Facilities -An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, amending Ordinance Number 11-23, the Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples, Inc. Community Facilities Planned Unit Development and amending Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of an additional 14+/- acres from the Estates zoning district to Emmanuel Lutheran Church Community Facilities Planned Unit Development (CFPUD), to add principal uses including colleges and universities, social service uses, government uses, medical office, physical fitness facilities, food trucks, and recreational facilities; to add accessory uses for lodging/dormitory and retail sale of agricultural products; to revise development standards, the legal description and Master Plan, for property located on the south side of Oil Well Road, in Section 19, Township 48 South, Range 28 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 35.92+/- acres; and by providing an effective date. [Coordinator: Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA, CSM, Planner III] (Companion GMPA-PL20200002204.) 6. **This item has been continued from the 2/15/2024 CCPC Meeting ** PL20230018350 LDCA - Updates to Removal of Exotic Vegetation - An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, amending Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) & Zoning Atlas, which includes the comprehensive land regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, to update the provisions related to the requirements for the removal of exotic vegetation. [Coordinator: Maria Estrada, Planner II] B. Noticed 10. Old Business 11. New Business 12. Public Comment 13. Adjourn Collier County Planning Commission Page 4 Printed 31112024 February 15, 2024 5.A.a TRANSCRIPT OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Naples, Florida February 15, 2024 LET IT BE REMEMBERED that the Collier County Planning Commission, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 9:00 a.m., in REGULAR SESSION in Building "F" of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the following members present: Edwin Fryer, Chairman Joe Schmitt, Vice Chair Robert L. Klucik, Jr. Randy Sparrazza Chuck Schumacher Amy Lockhart, Collier County School Board Representative ABSENT: Paul Shea Christopher T. Vernon ALSO PRESENT: Raymond V. Bellows, Zoning Manager Mike Bosi, Planning and Zoning Director Heidi Ashton-Cicko, Managing Assistant County Attorney Derek Perry, County Attorney's Office Page 1 of 14 Packet Pg. 5 February 15, 2024 5.A.a PROCEEDINGS MR. BOSI: Chair, you have a live mic. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you, Mr. Bosi. Good morning. The February 15, 2024, meeting of the Collier County Planning Commission is now in session. Please come to order. Please rise for the Pledge of Allegiance. (The Pledge of Allegiance was recited in unison.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: In the secretary's absence, I will call the roll. Ms. Lockhart? MS. LOCKHART: Here. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Commissioner Vernon? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Secretary Shea? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: I'm here. Vice Chair Schmitt? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Here. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Commissioner Klucik? COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Present. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Commissioner Sparrazza? COMMISSIONER SPARRAZZA: Here. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Commissioner Schumacher? COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: Here. CHAIRMAN FRYER: All right. One, two, three, four, five, six. We have a -- no, we have a quorum of five. Thank you. Okay. Addenda to the agenda. Oh, all -- the two absences are excused. Business commitments, so they're excused. Addenda to the agenda, Mr. Bellows. MR. BELLOWS: We have no changes. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Planning Commission absences. Let's see. Our next meeting is on March 7, 2024. Does anyone know if he or she will not be able to attend that meeting? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Same question for the meeting after that, March 21, 2024. It looks like we're pretty well assured of having a quorum. At this point I'm going to depart slightly from the agenda and talk about July 4th. As you probably don't know unless you've consulted your calendar recently, as I have, July 4th is scheduled to be one of our meetings. It's the second Thursday -- no, the first Thursday of July. And it's been proposed by staff that we would meet on July 3rd instead, and the rationale is is that we're missing a June meeting. But I wanted to get the sense from the Planning Commission of what their thinking was on that. So I'll open it up to the Planning Commission to make comments and also, Mr. Bosi, feel free to jump in at any time. MR. BOSI: And Mike Bosi, Planning and Zoning director. The only reason why I would, instead of just skipping that meeting, I tentatively want to have a conversation with the Planning Commission is because we are missing the second meeting in June. The Board has their budget workshop, so we're not going to be meeting on the -- it would have been the 20th of June. So it would be back -- we'd have -- we would have a gap between the 6th of June till July 18th would be -- would be -- so we would be missing two meetings. I don't know if we're going to have a ton of petitions on as we look out. I mean, we look out right now to May in terms of trying to allocate how many petitions that we will have. It's always hard to Page 2 of 14 Packet Pg. 6 5.A.a February 15, 2024 guess how many are going to break free from the review process to be eligible for the hearings. So I just wanted to at least have the conversation with the Planning Commission as to whether they wanted to potentially have that July 3rd as an alternate date or we can -- or the decision could be, you know, we can just skip two meetings, and then whatever we have to deal with on July 18th, if it's a big agenda, we'll adjust it. And to further, last year we missed both meetings in June because of the workshops, the budget workshops, and there wasn't a tremendous backlog, just to give you a little context as well. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Would there be another option rather than July 3rd? If we weren't able to complete our agenda on the 18th, could we come back on the 19th? Is the room available to finish up? MR. BOSI: I would have to check with Aimee, who basically manages the dates for the Board chambers, but I most certainly can do that, and then we can send out an e-mail to the Planning Commission to see what their preference is. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Vice Chairman Schmitt. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Is there another option? We could just do one on the l lth and another one on the following week instead of that week. People may have plans or whatever. That's, of course, a holiday weekend. It's a long holiday weekend. I'm going to be here regardless. I don't think I have any plans, but the other option would just be if you don't want to have -- if you don't want to have that kind of space in between, we just do the one on July -- I'm looking at the calendar again. MR. BOSI: The 18th? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yeah. We do 1 lth and then again on the 18th. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Commissioner Sparrazza. COMMISSIONER SPARRAZZA: What if we backed it up on the June 27th? It kind of spreads things out. You would have June 6th -- MR. BOSI: Again, staff is not available. The second and fourth Thursday is the HEX hearings, so we've got some competing interests in that as well. COMMISSIONER SPARRAZZA: I forgot. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Well, this is still February, so we have ample time. MR. BOSI: Yes. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Does anybody else want to offer their suggestions for staff to consider? Oh, guess whose name was just mentioned. MS. TROCHESSETT: July 1 lth is not available. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. What about the 19th? MS. TROCHESSETT: Of July? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Uh-huh. MS. TROCHESSETT: Maybe. Maybe. I would have to get approval, but that -- maybe. MR. BOSI: Then I think that would be the case, if we have -- if we have seven or eight petitions, we could try to get them all on the 18th, and if it doesn't -- if it doesn't -- and a lot of times, the room, when they have "maybe," it may be only available for four hours or whatever the case. But I can coordinate with Aimee, and if we can solidify that, that could be the plan. We can just cancel the week of the July 4th, have that canceled, and then have the Friday the 19th if we can get permission to schedule that as an overflow date for us. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Would that work with everybody? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yeah. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: Yeah. COMMISSIONER SPARRAZZA: Yeah. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. It works for me as well. That would be the preference. So, Aimee, work your magic for us. MS. TROCHESSETT: Okay. And I did hear you say June 19th is a possible day? That is not available. Page 3 of 14 Packet Pg. 7 5.A.a February 15, 2024 CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yeah. Okay. June 19, were we talking -- MS. TROCHESSETT: Somebody mentioned June 19th. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. MS. TROCHESSETT: So you want me to check on Friday -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: Friday. MR. BOSI: Friday, July 19th, as a potential overflow day for us. MS. TROCHESSETT: Okay. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you very much. Thanks for coming in. Do you have to listen to us all the time? MS. TROCHESSETT: I do. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Oh, I'm so sorry. My condolences to you. You must be a saint. MS. TROCHESSETT: No, I get to listen to you. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you so much, Aimee. MR. BOSI: Thank you, Chair. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Let's see here. Approval of the minutes is the next thing on the agenda. We have one set before us. Those are the minutes of January 18. Any corrections, changes, or editions to those minutes? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: If not, I'd entertain a motion. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: Motion to approve. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Second. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Further discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: If not, all those in favor of approving the January 18 minutes as submitted, say aye. COMMISSIONER SPARRAZZA: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Aye. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Aye. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: Aye. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: It passes unanimously. Thank you very much. BCC and recaps, Mr. Bellows. MR. BELLOWS: There were no land -use items at the last Board of County Commissioners meeting. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Thank you. Chairman's report, none today. Consent agenda, none today. Public hearings, our first and the only matters -- oh, I'm sorry. Mr. -- MR. BOSI: I'm sorry. I should have -- when you mentioned the addenda to the agenda, I just wanted to -- just a note, and we do have it on the agenda. The removal of exotic vegetation, that is being moved from this meeting. It was advertised for this meeting. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yeah. MR. BOSI: It's being moved to the March 7th meeting, so I just wanted to announce that so it's -- make it aware for the public. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Thank you very much. All right. Anything further from staff? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: If not, we'll go to Mr. -- no, we'll go to the public hearings. Page 4 of 14 Packet Pg. 8 5.A.a February 15, 2024 * * *Let's see. The first matter today is --are companions, and, of course, we'll hear them atone time, and they are PL20230002069, the Boat House Commercial Subdistrict Small -Scale Growth Management Plan amendment, and its companion, PL20230002068, the Boat House CPUDZ. All those wishing to testify in this matter, please rise to be sworn in by the court reporter. THE COURT REPORTER: Do you swear or affirm the testimony you will give will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth? (The speakers were duly sworn and indicated in the affirmative.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you very much. Ex parte disclosures from the Planning Commission beginning with Ms. Lockhart. MS. LOCKHART: None. COMMISSIONER SPARRAZZA: Conversation with Mr. Yovanovich and staff materials. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Matters of public record, meeting with staff, conversation with Mr. Yovanovich. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Conversation with Mr. Yovanovich. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: Public record, agenda materials, conversation with staff. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Nothing to disclose. CHAIRMAN FRYER: All right. The Chair recognizes Mr. Yovanovich. MR. YOVANOVICH: Thank you. Good morning. For the record, Rich Yovanovich on behalf of the applicant, which is Boat House of Naples Real Estate, LLC. With me today from Peninsula Engineering is Jessica Harrelson. She's our professional planner. And Josh Fruth is our engineer on the project. Mr. Trebilcock is here to answer traffic questions, and Jeremy Sterk is here to answer any environmental questions regarding the project. As was stated, we're here for two petitions. One is a Small -Scale Growth Management Plan amendment to essentially add as an allowed use on the property 20,000 square feet of boat sales and boat engine service repairs. The C-3 uses are already allowed on the property. We are rezoning the property, the PUD, to add that one use. The reason we have to add that one use is, if you -all recall, I think it was last meeting we had the Home Depot petition. There are some properties in Collier County that are deemed consistent by policy, and that's why they're designated commercial, and they're not within activity centers, and this is one of those pieces of property. And for purposes of putting this in context, it's hard to see, but that's a Circle K, which is already also zoned. It's, I think, C-3. Across the way is RaceTrac. You have self -storage. You have the county's CAT center for its buses. Across the way, you recently saw and approved a Growth Management Plan amendment and a PUD for the Everglades Equipment Group PUD. And you have -- am I still moving? Where am I? I lost the cursor. There we go. And here is a bowling alley that's been in this location for quite a while. So this area has been developed as commercial, and commercial zoning has been on this property for -- since at least 1989 when the Growth Management Plan was adopted and approved in Collier County, and long before that. The Future Land Use designation is Urban Residential. Obviously, we're making the change to this Boat House Urban Landfill Subdistrict for the proposed use. What I want -- what I think is typically a question about every time we come in and ask these -- for changes to the Growth Management Plan is what's the real impact on transportation. And Mr. Trebilcock can confirm this but, essentially, what we're asking to add, this use of boat repair and boat sales, the traffic generation is probably more similar to indoor self -storage than any other retail use that we can currently put on the property. So assuming that we go forward with what is proposed to go on this property -- and I believe that's going to occur because it's a relocation of a business, we'll essentially be reducing traffic that can already be generated from this site. I already briefly went over the zoning that's around us. So commercial zoning has been in this area since quite a while and probably predates most of the residential that came to this area later. Page 5 of 14 Packet Pg. 9 5.A.a February 15, 2024 As I typically do, I just do a brief overview of what we're proposing, the two requests. I'm going to have Jessica come up and take you through the master plan and the different commitments we've made with regard to buffering and the like to address questions that have been -- that came up as we were going through the process and discussing the project with our neighbors. And with that, after Jessica goes, we'll be available to answer any questions, unless you have questions now. CHAIRMAN FRYER: No one is signaling. MS. HARRELSON: Good morning. For the record, Jessica Harrelson, certified planner with Peninsula Engineering. What you see here is a depiction of the PUD master plan. Access will be from Radio Lane. The easternmost connection is the main public access. We do have a second employee emergency -only access as well in this location along the west. The preserve location is in the northwest corner of the property. We will be providing an enhanced buffer along the northern property line. It will be 25 feet in width. It will contain an 8-foot solid wall, and planting -- code -required plantings will be provided on the external side of that wall facing Radio Lane. Enhanced Type D buffers will be provided along Radio Road and Davis Boulevard where boats are on display along those frontages, and we will be providing a 10-foot Type A buffer along the east adjacent to that gas station there. We also have provided a potential future interconnect along the east to that commercial development. Development standards are 15-feet setbacks from the eastern property line, 25-foot setbacks along all other property lines. The maximum zoned height is 35 feet, actual height of 42. And just to note, under current zoning, the maximum zoned allowable height is 50 feet. So what we are requesting in the PUD is less than what is allowed today. The PUD will allow the development of up to 20,000 square feet of gross floor area for boat sales and service or a maximum of 32,500 square feet of commercial uses of the C-3 zoning district. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Pardon me for interrupting, Ms. Harrelson. MS. HARRELSON: Sure. CHAIRMAN FRYER: But I just want to be clear on one point. I'm clear, but I want the record to be. What you're asking for -- your request is disjunctive, "or." MS. HARRELSON: Correct. CHAIRMAN FRYER: You want to either go C-3, which you have the authority to do now, or this one C-5 use? MS. HARRELSON: Yes, that's correct. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. So if you went with the C-3, then the traffic would be the same as you're already permitted. So what -- just out of curiosity, if you have a -- what is the likelihood this is going to be C-3 versus the boat house? MS. HARRELSON: The current plans right now are to develop a boat sales and service facility, and I do have a preliminary land plan that I'll be going over later on in the presentation. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Pardon me for interrupting. MS. HARRELSON: No problem. Prohibited uses include homeless shelters and soup kitchens. To note, some of the developer commitments included in the PUD, Dark Skies compliant lighting is required. The PUD shall not exceed 134 two-way p.m. peak -hour trips, and that is based on the highest and best use of the property, so 32,500 square feet of retail. The required enhancements of the northern and right-of-way buffers that I previously talked about are included as a commitment. Hours of operation for boat sales and services is limited to 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday through Friday and 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. on Saturdays. Any repair and maintenance of boats will occur in an enclosed building, and outdoor storage of boat racks will be single level only. So no multilevel boat racks are allowed on the property. And like I said, the current development plans for the site are boat sales and service. So this is Page 6 of 14 Packet Pg. 10 February 15, 2024 the preliminary land plan. The service building is located along the north, and the sales building is this location. Public access and parking is along the east here. You can see these hatched areas are the preliminary locations for boat display along the rights -of -way. And, again, the preserve area in the northwest corner. These are preliminary renderings for that use. This is the service building. We have the service bay doors facing towards -- south towards Davis Boulevard. This is just a rendering of the sales building. So you can see it's been designed to be aesthetically pleasing. And then concerning the Small -Scale Growth Management Plan amendment, the request involves a site -specific text and map change to the Future Land Use Element requesting to establish the Boat House Commercial Subdistrict. Because boat sales and service are a higher intensity use than what is allowed by the current -- or currently by the GMP, the amendment is necessary. The C-3 zoning district currently allows for more intense uses as it relates to traffic, noise, and hours of operation, such as a gas station. So with the proximity to 75, we feel like this area is an appropriate location for this use. We held a NIM, neighborhood information meeting, last September. One person from the public attended and voiced no objections to the project. And then that concludes my presentation. And staff has recommended that the CCPC forward these petitions to the Board with approval -- recommendation of approval. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Vice Chairman Schmitt. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Jessica, can you go back to the slide with the site plan. I just want to highlight -- let's talk about the 8-foot wall -- MS. HARRELSON: Yes. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: -- that is -- I think the way this faces is actually south. COMMISSIONER SPARRAZZA: It will be up -- MS. HARRELSON: This is -- yeah, this is north. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Wait a minute. Okay. You're right. MS. HARRELSON: So that 8-foot solid wall will be facing -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yeah. So the 8-foot wall is placed there at the request of the residents across the street? MS. HARRELSON: No. That was --we just included that in the PUD to address compatibility. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: And so it's just an 8-foot section that will begin and end, so to speak, from east to west, west to east, whatever? MS. HARRELSON: Yes. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: There will be no gate at the entranceways. It will just be a wall from one entrance to the other? MS. HARRELSON: Yeah. So the wall will run the entire length until the preserve area. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Well, wait a minute. Okay. So there will be a gate that closes and opens each of those entrances? MS. HARRELSON: For the employee and emergency -only access, those are gated off. There's a gate in this location here and a gate in this location here. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. Let's look at the one on the other -- the regular, I guess, commercial -- the entrance for public. That -- that will be -- that will be open. MS.14ARRELSON: That will be open. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. I just want to be clear. So the rest of it is a wall? MS. HARRELSON: Correct. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: And it will be landscaped and all the other kind of things that you would do with a -- with the perimeter wall. Okay. Thank you. MS. HARRELSON: No problem. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Commissioner Sparrazza. COMMISSIONER SPARRAZZA: Jessica, thank you for your presentation. I believe my question was just answered. But the wall would actually go from I'll call it the east side of the Page 7 of 14 Packet Pg. 11 5.A.a February 15, 2024 emergency exit, right there -- oop -- MS. HARRELSON: Yep. COMMISSIONER SPARRAZZA: -- to the west side of the public exit -- entrance? MS. HARRELSON: Correct, and then there's a section located here as well. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: There will be a section there -- COMMISSIONER SPARRAZZA: A little section there. MS. HARRELSON: Yes. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. No one else is signaling. Anything further from the applicant? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Anything further from the applicant? MS. HARRELSON: Oh, no. Sorry. CHAIRMAN FRYER: That's all right. Thank you. We'll now hear from staff. MS. HARRELSON: Thank you. MR. BOSI: Mike Bosi, Planning and Zoning director. As Jessica has indicated, staff is recommending approval. I do have Kathy Eastley, who did the Comprehensive Plan review, as well as Nancy Gundlach, who did the zoning review, available if the Planning Commission had any specific questions. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: We haven't heard from Nancy in a long time, so we ought to. No, I'm just kidding. CHAIRMAN FRYER: We can hear from both of them. Go ahead, Ms. Eastley. MS. EASTLEY: Thank you. Good morning. Kathy Eastley, Comprehensive Planning. Staff is recommending approval. We did find a couple of items: That sufficient mitigation measures were provided along that northern boundary to screen both the noise and the visual impact from the development to the residential and, two, that this is an existing business in Collier County that is currently located at the west end of Davis Boulevard by 41. And with the redevelopment that's occurring in that area, they are moving to the east end, and it seems to be a better location for them because it is closer to 1-75. So I have no other issues and can answer any questions you may have. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. No one's signaling at this time. So thank you, Ms. Eastley. Mr. Gundlach. Commissioner Schumacher. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: I just had a question on the zoning -- current zoning now, what -- if this didn't go through, what could they put there? CHAIRMAN FRYER: C-3. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: C-3. MS. GUNDLACH: That's correct. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: Or they could even do the Live Local Act and put in residential, correct? MR. BOSI: It would be eligible. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: It would be eligible. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: It would be eligible, absolutely. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Which means we'd never see it again. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: Exactly. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Any questions for Ms. Gundlach? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: All right. Thank you for being available. MS. GUNDLACH: You're welcome. CHAIRMAN FRYER: All right. We'll now ask whether there are public speakers who have Page 8 of 14 Packet Pg. 12 5.A.a February 15, 2024 registered. MR. SABO: Mr. Chairman, there is one public speaker, Brenda Turner. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Ms. Turner, now is your opportunity to be heard. MS. TURNER: I feel like I'm outnumbered here. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Well, I'll bet you hold your own. MS. TURNER: My name is Brenda Turner. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Why don't you lower that mic. The mic was set up for giant person. There you go. MS. TURNER: Is that all right? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Well, I think so. MS. TURNER: Okay. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Give us your name. MS. TURNER: My name is Brenda Turner. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. MS. TURNER: I have lived in that neighborhood since 1971. I've seen a lot of changes in this area of the residential. I have several questions. I don't know who I'm to give them to, but I -- that area -- this area is too small for what -all they want to do. Radio Lane is just two lanes, and it goes from Radio Road down into Saddlebrook, Tuscany Isles, past the Circle K, two lanes. If you come down Radio Road, there's one red light there, and it's taking care of Radio Road and Davis Boulevard. So from that red light, we have got two gas stations, three restaurants, and then fast food, and then at Davis light and Radio Road, we've got two gas stations, one bowling alley, two apartment buildings, two housing complexes, one CAT bus station. I cannot be convinced that that triangle of land is going to handle the traffic. We're getting a new flyover on Davis. We're getting two new ramps, off and on ramps there at 1-75. We're getting three, at least, new restaurants in that vicinity. I need to know what types and sizes of the boats. Where's the entrance and the exit? How big of a boat trailer is going to be pulling into that two-lane road where we have school buses and school children and walkers and homeless people, you know. And the EPA, does that get involved with this? Are they going to be painting and working outside sanding boats? What about the water drainage, the oil fluids when they work on that? Does the EPA get involved? And how big are the boat haulers? And is there going to be a dumpster there? What goes in the dumpsters? I've got questions, but the main thing -- my problem is, I cannot see that area holding the traffic that they say it's not going to change. They are 100 percent wrong. You can look at it and see that it will change. There will be more traffic. There's going to be more congestion. We have a stop sign at Radio Lane to pull out onto Davis. I've sat there as long as eight minutes waiting on traffic to slowdown so I can just go through the stop sign and not the red light. I've sat at the red light as long as two times turning to go to Walmart. And then that red light at 951, we've got an Amazon over there. It is -- I can't see it working. And I just ask that if you -all really want to check this out, get in your cars and drive out there and look at how congested that area is. And like I said, I've been there since 71. I'm not opposed to growth and development, but I feel like this is just a little bit too much for that area and the two-lane road, Radio Lane, and then Davis. I just have a lot of questions, and I'm just not comfortable with this. And I just ask that you -all think about it, get out, drive around, look at it, and picture it with the new on and off ramps, the congestion. And if we have a hurricane, God forbid, it's going to become a roadblock. There's nobody going to get out in that area. I've seen it happen with the previous hurricanes. There's a roadblock. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Ma'am, thank you very much. And we will get answers to your questions. They're good ones. MS. TURNER: I appreciate that, and thank you very much. Page 9 of 14 Packet Pg. 13 5.A.a February 15, 2024 CHAIRMAN FRYER: And the applicant will have an opportunity to respond and rebut, and I know they were taking notes. And you can stay at the podium. We would -- we will want to see if there are any other speakers. I don't think there are. But one thing I would say -- and your comments divided themselves into two categories. One was just development of any kind whatsoever, and to that point I would remind you, respectfully, they've already got C-3 privileges which would generate -- it seems to me, just as a reasonable person, who thinks he's a reasonable person, that you're going to get less traffic with the boat operation, but I don't know, and I'm not going to argue that with you. MS. TURNER: Yeah. CHAIRMAN FRYER: But -- so that's -- that's just something to keep in mind, what they're already permitted for. But we're going to get into some significant detail when they come back, and we'll get those questions answered, and we thank you very much for your participation. MS. TURNER: I thank you -all. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you, ma'am. Any other registered speakers? Oh, I'm sorry. Vice Chairman. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Ma'am, you do understand the current zoning is C-3, means commercial at an intensity three? MS. TURNER: I do not know what intensity three means. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: C-3 means it could be a commercial site. MS. TURNER: Well, I have no problem with commercial. CHAIRMAN FRYER: We need you at the microphone. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Ma'am, it's -- MS. TURNER: I have no problem with the commercial. What I have a problem with is the traffic on this triangle and us just having a two-lane road that that building is going to be facing. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yeah. I understand, ma'am. A C-3 is allowed to go in there. It could be -- and I'll turn to staff. C-3 allows for pretty intense. And the zoning already exists, and it already is included in the traffic vested rights to develop that site. So it's going to be developed. It's not going to stay -- it's not going to stay a forest. MS. TURNER: I know Collier County, if they find a piece of grass, they're going to pour cement on it. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. Thank you. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you very much. Thank you, ma'am. Other speakers? MR. SABO: Chair, there are no other speakers. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Anyone in the room who has not yet registered but wishes to speak on this, now would be the time to please raise your hand. (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: I see no hands being raised. So with that, we will close the public's comment portion of this hearing, and we'll go to rebuttal. And, Mr. Yovanovich, you have the floor. MR. YOVANOVICH: Thank you. I deliberately mentioned early on in my presentation that what we're proposing is actually a reduction in traffic from what could actually occur on the property today. C-3 zoning is intense, and it's intended to be an attractor, bringing people there from several neighbors to these types of uses that could go on the C-3 property, the very thing she mentioned, restaurants, gas stations, other types of things that would attract people to this location. So traffic's coming to this location. The question becomes what's the best traffic option? The location of the access will be the same. Regardless of whether it's what we're proposing or it's your typical C-3 types of uses that are going to go on the property, the access is going to be on Radio Page 10 of 14 Packet Pg. 14 5.A.a February 15, 2024 Lane. With regard to the actual operations that my client's proposing at put on the property, they typically display 30 to 40 boats on the property. The sizes of the boats can range from 20 feet to 45 feet. The current average is 28-feet size boats. The high percentage of boats that are brought there for repair are brought there by our staff. Most people don't feel comfortable trailering their boat to the location to get repaired, so it's being trailered by people who do this as a profession. So safety is paramount for my client, who wanted to make sure that there are no issues related to accessing the property for repairs. I understand that the public doesn't typically know what you -all know with regard to what can happen on a property and what is a large traffic generator. And it always comes across as -- almost as if it's a threat to say the property's going to get developed, but it's going to get developed. It already has zoning on the property with far more intensive uses. It also now, thanks to the legislature, is eligible for high -density residential that could go on that property. And if you want to put a use on a piece of property during hurricane season that probably is not the right use from a traffic standpoint, put more residential on that piece of property. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Mr. Yovanovich, why don't you -- if you'd take a moment to explain to Ms. Turner about the potential effect of Live Local and how that's not a part of your plan. MR. YOVANOVICH: I understand. The last legislative session, the State Legislature, in an effort to provide workforce and affordable housing to address what I think everybody acknowledges is a shortage of housing for those people who work to serve those of us in Collier County and other parts of the state, have adopted a statute that basically forces the government, Collier County, to approve, without any public hearings, commercial property to be developed as mixed -use which could include commercial or -- and/or residential. Residential has to be part of this option, and it's at the most -- it's at the highest density approved in Collier County, which is somewhere around 92 units per acre. Obviously, 92 units per acre is not going to fit on this piece of property, but 92 units per acre, and at a height -- within either approved height or actually constructed height within a mile. So as this commission has mentioned many times, if that route is taken, there are no public hearings. We will develop according to the RMF-16 standards, and I'm sure Mr. Bosi will correct me if I've got that wrong, and we'll go straight to Site Development Plan, and we'll move forward with that project, and that will happen. So there will be no public -- there will be no public involvement in whether or not that project happens. Likewise, there will be no public involvement if we decide to go forward with C-3. We'll come in. We'll do a Site Development Plan. We'll meet the development standards that are applicable to C-3, which, as Jessica pointed out, actually is a higher building than what we're proposing and candidly, more intense from a traffic standpoint. Those are the rights that we have as a matter of right today. Come in C-3, no public involvement. Live Local, no public involvement. The beauty of rezoning and doing this Growth Management Plan is there is public involvement and there's the ability to include provisions like the enhanced buffers that we're proposing, like the wall that we're proposing, like the use that we're proposing that, candidly, is a very low traffic generator on this site. As Jessica has taken you through, I think, we've done a very, very good job of taking our neighbors' concerns into consideration. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Ms. Turner mentioned dumpsters, and I assume it would be less intense than it would be under C-3. MR. YOVANOVICH: I'm sure -- and I could bring Josh up to you, and I'm sure he can assure you that there are a lot more dumpsters associated with C-3 or residential. The level of dumpsters is significantly less with this type of use on the property. And the way we've -- the conditions we've imposed by all the repairs have to be indoors, the -- where we put doors to make sure they're away from residential, none of those are requirements under C-3. Those are requirements that we're imposing upon ourselves under the PUD rezoning that Page 11 of 14 Packet Pg. 15 5.A.a February 15, 2024 we're going forward with. I welcome the opportunity to talk to Ms. Turner outside of here if she would like to, and we'll -- I'd be happy to show her in more detail how the site will work and how the traffic will work, or, you know, Mr. Trebilcock can explain that all to her. We could do it now if you prefer, but I think that, as you know, your entire staff reviews this -- they're unbiased -- and Transportation has determined that this is an appropriate use on the site as well as your planning staff has -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: Before I call on Commissioner Sparrazza, I just want to say that I think that is a generous invitation from the applicant, and I encourage you to get with him. From our perspective, our hands are pretty much tied down by the folks in Tallahassee who, in their wisdom, have done some things that we have no control over. And so we try to do the best we can if you're given the limitations. Thank you. And now Commissioner Sparrazza. COMMISSIONER SPARRAZZA: Thank you, Chairman. Mr. Yovanovich, and maybe for -- a traffic question here. You said you could pull up to maybe a 45-foot boat. So that will be on a trailer pulled by a large, you know, dual pickup truck or whatever. MR. YOVANOVICH: Yep. COMMISSIONER SPARRAZZA: Will that make the turn fairly easily on Radio Lane turning right into the facility? MR. YOVANOVICH: I'm going to have Josh get into that, because there's -- at site planning there's a lot of analysis that is required in order for the site plan to be approved. COMMISSIONER SPARRAZZA: Great. It was an excellent question brought up by Ms. Turner, and I'm just seeing if we can get some more details around that. Thank you. Josh. MR. FRUTH: Yeah. For the record, Josh Fruth with Peninsula. So all the site plans, to start with, have to be designed for 105-foot fire truck as well; keep that in mind. So the turning radius of that is -- without having to pivot point with a trailer is kind of part of what we start with. But yes, since the fire truck can navigate the site, and that is through both access points we have shown, we also have shown that pulling a 45-foot boat will go through the site as well, so... COMMISSIONER SPARRAZZA: Great. Thank you for that. MR. FRUTH: Yep. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Anything further, Mr. Yovanovich? MR. YOVANOVICH: No, sir. Obviously, we have everybody from the team here if there are any further questions that you would like us to answer. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Thank you. I think it's time for us to deliberate and vote. No one is signaling. I'll just follow on with what I started to say in the context of what I think is an evolving set of standards with respect to Growth Management Plan amendments -- and I welcome the evolution to perhaps more stricter scrutiny. But in my judgment, the analysis that was provided, the needs analysis, complied fully with what we expect to see when we make a decision to change a document that ordinarily people should have every right to expect will not be changed. It found the existence of need, and the reasons that it supplied for its finding were persuasive. This is an organization that's moving its site from one place to another, and the lack of available supply from other vendors, and combined with the location -- I realize there's residential on two sides. There's also commercial on two sides. So it seems to be a very appropriate fit for me. And the 8-foot wall should mitigate, to a significant degree, the noise. And it would be -- it would be a lot noisier if they go C-3. So for that reason, I'm going to be voting in favor of it. Anybody else want to comment? Commissioner Schumacher. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: I've been agreeing with Rich way too much lately. We've got to get off of this. I agree that this is probably the best use for this property. Boat sales, it's not like car sales. If Page 12 of 14 Packet Pg. 16 February 15, 2024 you're going to the boat house, it's a deliberate trip. It's not kicking tires. I think the traffic that would be generated from this site is less than what is in the report. And it's a great fit for that corner. It's much better than anything else that could be placed there, and for that reason, I will be voting to approve as well. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Commissioner Klucik. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Yes. I would just like to agree, and this is one of those easy ones where there's very little in my mind, you know, to really consider because the four corners, you know, of the application meet the -- you know, if you look at the rules that apply, this is an easy thing to vote yes on. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Vice Chairman. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yeah. I'd make a recommendation to approve both the Comprehensive Plan amendment and the PUD, PL20230002069 and companion 20230002068, with -- there's been no other adjusted amendments that were discussed, so I'd recommend approval as proposed by both the petitioner and as approved by staff, recommended approval by staff. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. And as we await a second, I'll just say that EAC approval's not required. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Not required. Thanks. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Is there a second? COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: Second. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Any further discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: If not, we'll vote jointly on both the GMPA and PUDZ. All those in favor, please say aye. COMMISSIONER SPARRAZZA: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Aye. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Aye. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: Aye. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: It passes unanimously. Thank you, applicant. Thank you, Ms. Turner. And thank you, staff and Commission. All right. It's 9:43. Let's see. Any old business? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: I don't believe there is. Any new business? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Likewise, don't believe there's any of that. Any public comment? Any member of the public want to be heard on a matter that was not on our agenda today, now would be the time. (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: No one is wanting to be heard. So, therefore, without objection, we're adjourned. COMMISSIONER SPARRAZZA: Thank you. Page 13 of 14 Packet Pg. 17 February 15, 2024 5.A.a There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair at 9:43 a.m. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION EDWIN FRYER, CHAIRMAN These minutes approved by the Board on , as presented or as corrected TRANSCRIPT PREPARED ON BEHALF OF FORT MYERS COURT REPORTING BY TERRI L. LEWIS, RPR, FPR-C, COURT REPORTER AND NOTARY PUBLIC. Page 14 of 14 Packet Pg. 18 9.A.1.a PL20220003225 Coi Lire-r Co�.-r�.ty STAFF REPORT COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT, ZONING DIVISION, COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING SECTION HEARING DATE: March 7, 2024 SUBJECT: PL20220003225 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT (GMPA): LIVINGSTON ROAD/VETERANS MEMORIAL BOULEVARD COMMERCIAL INFILL SUBDISTRICT (ADOPTION HEARING) COMPANION TO: PL20220003226 LIVINGSTON VETERANS COMMERCIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (CPUD) ELEMENTS: FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT AGENT/APPLICANT: Agents: Christopher Scott, AICP Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. Peninsula Engineering Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. 2600 Golden Gate Parkway 4001 Tamiami Trail N, Suite 300 Naples, FL 34104 Naples, FL 34103 Owner: Livingston Veterans Commercial, LLC 4980 Tamiami Trail North, #201 Naples, FL 34103 GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The f4.68-acre subject property consists of two parcels and is located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Livingston Road and Veterans Memorial Boulevard in Section 13, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. Packet Pg. 19 9.A.1.a PL20220003225 PROJECT LOCATION TRACT L-de T TNT U O Cry TR CL PU wCC SITE TRACT O p -- LOCATION Veto ft Memorial BLVD A RPUD IALURARPM CONSERVATION FSMT ao OR 5708 PUP 224S 15,MAC O I whMp wi was 27 2 Packet Pg. 20 9.A.1.a PL20220003225 REQUESTED ACTION: The applicant proposes a small-scale Growth Management Plan (GMP) amendment to the Future Lane Use Element (FLUE), specifically to expand the Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard Commercial Infill Subdistrict by redesignating ±2.39 acres from Urban Residential Subdistrict to Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard Commercial Infill Subdistrict, and to expand the permitted commercial intensity of the Subdistrict. The applicant also proposes to amend the countywide Future Land Use Map (FLUM) and the Subdistrict inset map in the FLUM series of the FLUE. The proposed GMP Amendment is attached as Exhibit "A." PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: To redesignate f2.39 acres from Urban Residential Subdistrict to Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard Commercial Infill Subdistrict, and to expand the permitted commercial intensity of the Subdistrict to permit a maximum of 100,000 square feet of gross floor area of indoor air-conditioned mini - and self -storage warehouse (SIC 4225), and up to 50,000 square feet of gross floor area of Commercial Professional (C-1) through Commercial Intermediate (C-3) commercial uses. A companion petition (PL20220003226) would rezone the property from C-1 zoning district and Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district to Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD). EXISTING CONDITIONS: Subject Property: The ±4.68-acre site is zoned C-1 and Agricultural and consists of two parcels (folio numbers 00149720005 and 00150080006), both of which are currently undeveloped. The northern parcel is designated Urban, Urban Commercial District, Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard Commercial Infill Subdistrict, and the southern parcel is designated Urban, Urban Mixed -Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict, all as identified on the FLUM. Surrounding Lands: North — Future Land Use Designation: Urban Residential Subdistrict. Zoned: Mediterra PUD. Land Use: single-family residential (across Veterans Memorial Boulevard, a local road). East — Future Land Use Designation: Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard East Residential Subdistrict. Zoned: Altura PUD. Land Use: multifamily residential. South — Future Land Use Designation: Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard East Residential Subdistrict. Zoned: Allura PUD. Land Use: multifamily residential. West — Future Land Use Designation: Urban Residential Subdistrict. Zoned: Agricultural. Land Use: undeveloped lot (across Livingston Road, a major arterial). In summary, the existing land uses in the surrounding area are primarily residential, with a mix of single- family and multifamily. Community facilities in the area include Veterans Memorial Elementary School, approximately 750 feet east of the project site; North Collier Fire Rescue District, approximately 850 feet south of the site; and Aubrey Rogers High School, approximately 1.25 miles east of the site. The entire subject property lies within the Northwest Transportation Concurrency Management Area (TCMA), an area where traffic management strategies are employed to reduce traffic impacts. This TCMA is bounded by the Collier — Lee County Line on the north side, I-75 right-of-way on the east side, Pine Ridge Road on the south side, and the Gulf of Mexico on the west side. Veterans Memorial Boulevard currently extends approximately 1.25 miles west and terminates at the entrance of Aubrey Rogers High Packet Pg. 21 9.A.1.a PL20220003225 School; extension of the road west to Old 41 and US 41 North is identified as fully funded in the 2023 Annual Update and Inventory Report & Capital Improvement Element (AUIR-CIE) for design and construction between 2024-2028. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS: The FLUE currently designates the northern parcel of the subject property as Urban, Urban Commercial District, Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard Commercial Infill Subdistrict, and the southern parcel as Urban, Urban Mixed -Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict. The Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard Commercial Infill Subdistrict was established by Ordinance 2004-71 on October 26, 2004, to allow those office uses, medical uses, and financial institutions permitted by right and by conditional use within the C-1 zoning district. It was designed to serve surrounding residential uses and was limited to a maximum commercial intensity of 50,000 square feet and a maximum height of 35 feet. The original ±2.25 acres were rezoned from Agricultural to C-1 by Ordinance 2006-23, but no C-1 uses were ever developed on the property. The Urban Residential Subdistrict is intended to provide for higher densities in an area with fewer natural resource constraints and where existing and planned public facilities are concentrated. The applicant proposes to expand the Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard Commercial Infill Subdistrict by redesignating f2.39 acres from Urban Residential Subdistrict to Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard Commercial Infill Subdistrict and to expand the permitted commercial intensity of the Subdistrict to allow a maximum of 100,000 square feet of gross floor area of indoor air-conditioned mini - and self -storage warehouse (SIC 4225), and up to 50,000 square feet of gross floor area of C-1 through C- 3 commercial uses. Compatibility (including appropriateness of the location) and commercial need for this project are identified by staff as the main areas of concern to address. Compatibilit. FLUE Policy 5.6 requires new land uses to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. In reviewing the appropriateness of the requested uses and intensity on the subject site, a compatibility analysis might include a review of allowed use intensities and densities, development standards (building heights, setbacks, landscape buffers, etc.), building mass, building location, and orientation, architectural features, amount and type of open space, and location. The area surrounding the proposed subdistrict is generally residential and institutional in nature, as demonstrated in the Existing Conditions section of this report. Planning principals support locating higher - intensity development closer to major roadways, with use intensities transitioning lower into residential neighborhoods. Relevant to transitioning intensities, the project is bounded to the south and east by a multifamily development (Allura PUD) which allows a maximum of 8.55 dwelling units per acre and a maximum actual height of 50 feet. Additionally, staff concurs with the applicant's assertion that the intersection of Livingston Road, a major arterial, and Veterans Memorial, a planned future collector, is a suitable location for commercial uses to support the surrounding residential and community facilities, particularly the proposed C-1 through C-3 uses. Per the Urban Land Institute (ULI), 50,000 square feet of C-1 — C-3 uses can be categorized as Neighborhood Commercial, which is generally intended to meet the daily needs of the immediate neighborhood. One hundred thousand (100,000) square feet of indoor self -storage would be categorized as Community Commercial. Although self -storage is a relatively low -impact use in terms of traffic and overall intensity, the scale of the proposed self -storage development is inconsistent with the size and nature of the intersection. The chart below compares several self -storage facilities, which are approximately 100,000 square feet or larger. Of the eleven facilities listed, five are located in Mixed Use Activity Centers, and four are considered consistent by policy (retained their commercial or industrial zoning during the 1991 downzoning) or pre- date the 1991 Growth Management Plan. The two remaining facilities are located within subdistricts created 4 Packet Pg. 22 9.A.1.a PL20220003225 by site -specific Growth Management Plan amendments, both at intersections with similarly scaled commercial development (Collier Boulevard/Vanderbilt Beach Road and Immokalee Road/Randall Boulevard). In order to be consistent in scale with the intersection at Livingston Road and Veterans Memorial Boulevard, staff is recommending a reduction in the total commercial intensity of the subdistrict to 100,000 square feet or less, which is consistent with the ULI definition of Neighborhood Commercial. FACILITY ADDRESS FLU DESIGNATION AREA (SQ FT) NAME Life Storage 111201 Tamiami TRL Urban Residential** 90,972 The Lock 2295 Tamiami TRL E Urban Residential, Bayshore/Gateway 91 106 Up Triangle Redevelopment Overlay** ' Public 13191 Tamiami TRL Mixed Use Activity Center #18 94,191 Storage E Cube Smart 7205 Vanderbilt WAY Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier 95,550 Commercial Subdistrict Hide -Away 1597 Pine Ridge RD Urban Residential* 100,368 Storage Extra Space 5304 Useppa WAY Mixed Use Activity Center #4 104,364 Store All 8D7R05 Addison Place Mixed Use Activity Center #3 105,000 Extra Space p 10550 Goodlette- Urban Residential** 115,824 Frank RD Cube Smart 750 Valley Stream DR Mixed Use Activity Center #17 120,752 Winchester 13755 Winchester Immokalee Rd/Estates Commercial 128,742 Storage TRL Subdistrict Life Storage 7391 Rattlesnake Mixed Use Activity Center #7 153,548 Hammock RD *PUD pre -dates 1991 GMP **Consistent by Policy Compatibility can be more specifically addressed within the companion zoning petition, but staff finds that, with a reduction in the permitted self -storage square footage, the requested uses will be compatible with the surrounding area and that this is an appropriate location to provide for a mix of commercial uses. Needs Analysis: Real Estate Econometrics, Inc. conducted a market demand analysis ("Retail, Fuel Station, Self -Storage Analysis" is included in the backup materials) for general retail, gasoline service stations, and self -storage at the subject site. Staff notes the following from the market analysis: • The population of Collier County is projected to total 597,695 residents by 2045, an annual growth rate of approximately 2% per year. • Within the 10-minute drive time market area utilized for general retail, the 2021 population was 38,309 or 9.8% of the total population, projected to grow to 57,890 by 2045. • The market analysis for general retail indicates an allocation ratio of 1.13 for the 2030 horizon, which is below the County's maximum 1.15 allocation ratio. • Within the 5-minute drive time market area utilized for gasoline service stations, the 2021 population was 6,490, and the number of households was 3,200. Within the market area, 37.89% of the population is part of the workforce (employed population over 16 years old). • Per ESRI data, gallons of fuel consumed in the market area will see a demand increase of 12.53% between 2021 and 2024. • The addition of the project to the market area will result in a surplus of 0.66% of the supply of gasoline, which will not adversely affect the balance of supply and demand. Packet Pg. 23 9.A.1.a PL20220003225 • Within the 3-mile market area used for self -storage, the 2020 population was 42,307, project to grow to 53,945 by 2026. • The proposed 100,000 square feet of self -storage will ultimately result in a deficit of nearly 107,000 square feet for the 2030 horizon. Based on the market analysis, staff agrees with the applicant that the provided data and analysis reasonably demonstrates a need for the proposed project. CRITERIA FOR GMP AMENDMENTS FLORIDA STATUTES: Data and analysis requirements for comprehensive plans and plan amendments are noted in Chapter 163, F.S., specifically as listed below. Section 163.3177(1)(f), Florida Statutes: (f) All mandatory and optional elements of the comprehensive plan and plan amendments shall be based upon relevant and appropriate data and an analysis by the local government that may include, but not be limited to, surveys, studies, community goals and vision, and other data available at the time of adoption of the comprehensive plan or plan amendment. To be based on data means to react to it in an appropriate way and to the extent necessary, indicated by the data available on that particular subject at the time of adoption of the plan or plan amendment at issue. Surveys, studies, and data utilized in the preparation of the comprehensive plan may not be deemed a part of the comprehensive plan unless adopted as a part of it. Copies of such studies, surveys, data, and supporting documents for proposed plans and plan amendments shall be made available for public inspection, and copies of such plans shall be made available to the public upon payment of reasonable charges for reproduction. Support data or summaries are not subject to the compliance review process, but the comprehensive plan must be clearly based on appropriate data. Support data or summaries may be used to aid in the determination of compliance and consistency. 2. Data must be taken from professionally accepted sources. The application of a methodology utilized in data collection or whether a particular methodology is professionally accepted may be evaluated. However, the evaluation may not include whether one accepted methodology is better than another. Original data collection by local governments is not required. However, local governments may use original data so long as methodologies are professionally accepted. The comprehensive plan shall be based upon permanent and seasonal population estimates and projections, which shall either be those published by the Office of Economic and Demographic Research or generated by the local government based upon a professionally acceptable methodology. The plan must be based on at least the minimum amount of land required to accommodate the medium projections as published by the Office of Economic and Demographic Research for at least a 10-year planning period unless otherwise limited under s. 380.05, including related rules of the Administration Commission. Absent physical limitations on population growth, population projections for each municipality and the unincorporated area within a county must, at a minimum, be reflective of each area's proportional share of the total county population and the total county population growth. Section 163.3177(6)(a)2., Florida Statutes: 2. The future land use plan and plan amendments shall be based upon surveys, studies, and data regarding the area, as applicable, including: a. The amount of land required to accommodate anticipated growth. b. The projected permanent and seasonal population of the area. c. The character of undeveloped land. 6 Packet Pg. 24 9.A.1.a PL20220003225 d. The availability of water supplies, public facilities, and services. e. The need for redevelopment, including the renewal of blighted areas and the elimination of nonconforming uses inconsistent with the community's character. f. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to or closely proximate to military installations. g. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to an airport as defined in s. 330.35 and consistent with s. 333.02. h. The discouragement of urban sprawl. i. The need for job creation, capital investment, and economic development that will strengthen and diversify the community's economy. j. The need to modify land uses and development patterns within antiquated subdivisions. Section 163.3177(6)(a)8., Florida Statutes: (a) A future land use plan element designating proposed future general distribution, location, and extent of the uses of land for residential uses, commercial uses, industry, agriculture, recreation, conservation, education, public facilities, and other categories of the public and private uses of land. The approximate acreage and the general range of density or intensity of use shall be provided for the gross land area included in each existing land use category. The element shall establish the long-term end toward which land use programs and activities are ultimately directed. 8. Future land use map amendments shall be based upon the following analyses: a. An analysis of the availability of facilities and services. b. An analysis of the suitability of the plan amendment for its proposed use considering the character of the undeveloped land, soils, topography, natural resources, and historic resources on site. c. An analysis of the minimum amount of land needed to achieve the goals and requirements of this section. The petitioner must provide appropriate and relevant data and analysis to address the statutory requirements for a Plan Amendment. For this petition, the applicant provided a market analysis ("Retail, Fuel Station, Self -Storage Needs Analysis"). Section 163.3187, Florida Statutes: Process for adoption of small-scale comprehensive plan amendment. (1) A small-scale development amendment may be adopted under the following conditions: (a) The proposed amendment involves a use of 50 acres or fewer. [The subject site comprises ±4.68 acres.] (b) (The proposed amendment does not involve a text change to the goals, policies, and objectives of the local government's comprehensive plan but only proposes a land use change to the future land use map for a site -specific small-scale development activity. However, text changes that relate directly to and are adopted simultaneously with the small-scale future land use map amendment shall be permissible under this section. [This amendment includes a text change to the Comprehensive Plan, which is directly related to the proposed future land use map amendment.] (c) The property that is the subject of the proposed amendment is not located within an area of critical state concern unless the project subject to the proposed amendment involves the construction of affordable housing units meeting the criteria of s. 420.0004(3), and is located within an area of critical state concern designated by s. 380.0552 or by the Administration Commission pursuant to s. 380.05(1). [The subject property is not located within an Area of Critical State Concern.] (d) Comprehensive plans may only be amended in such a way as to preserve the internal consistency of the plan pursuant to s. 163.3177. Corrections, updates, or modifications of current costs which were set out as part of the comprehensive plan shall not, for the purposes Packet Pg. 25 9.A.1.a PL20220003225 of this act, be deemed to be amendments. [This amendment preserves the internal consistency of the plan and is not a correction, update, or modification of current costs that were set out as part of the comprehensive plan.] NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM) NOTES: The NIM was held on October 24, 2023, at the Collier County Library Headquarters Branch Sugden Theater (2385 Orange Blossom Road, Naples, Florida). The meeting commenced at approximately 5:30 p.m. and adjourned at approximately 6:00 p.m. Thirteen members of the public attended the meeting in person, and four attended via Zoom. The applicant's agent, Christopher Scott, AICP, explained the request for the proposed rezone and the companion small-scale Growth Management Plan amendment. A full transcript of the NIM and other documentation is included in the CCPC backup materials. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: • The petition proposes to add f2.39 acres to the existing Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard Commercial Infill Subdistrict and to expand the permitted commercial intensity of the Subdistrict. • There are no adverse environmental impacts as a result of this petition. • No historical or archaeological sites are affected by this amendment. • There are no transportation or public utility -related concerns as a result of this petition. • There are no concerns about impacts on other public infrastructure. • There is a reasonably demonstrated need for the proposed use. • Although staff finds the uses to be generally compatible with the surrounding area, the proposed 100,000 square feet of indoor self -storage is inconsistent with the scale of the intersection and with the intended neighborhood commercial uses. Staff recommends a reduction in the total commercial intensity of the subdistrict to 100,000 square feet or less, which is consistent with the ULI definition of Neighborhood Commercial. Environmental Findings: Environmental review staff has found this project to be consistent with the Conservation & Coastal Management Element (CCME). A minimum of 0.44 acres (10%) of native vegetation is required to be preserved. This project does not require Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. Environmental Services staff recommends approval of the proposed petition. LEGAL REVIEW: The County Attorney's Office reviewed the Staff Report for this petition on February 8, 2024. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Collier County Planning Commission forward petition PL20220003225 Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard Commercial Infill Subdistrict GMPA to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation to approve and adopt and transmit to the Florida Department of Commerce and other statutorily required agencies, with the following condition: • Reduce the total permitted commercial intensity of the subdistrict to 100,000 square feet or less NOTE: This petition has been tentatively scheduled for the April 23, 2024 BCC meeting. Packet Pg. 26 9.A.1.b ORDINANCE NO. 2024- AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO.89- 05, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT AND FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND MAP SERIES BY CHANGING THE DESIGNATION OF 2.4 ACRES OF LAND FROM URBAN RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT, MIXED USE DISTRICT TO URBAN -COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, LIVINGSTON ROAD/VETERANS MEMORIAL BOULEVARD COMMERCIAL INFILL DISTRICT AND AMENDING THE LIVINGSTON ROAD/VETERANS MEMORIAL BOULEVARD COMMERCIAL INFILL SUBDISTRICT TO ADD 100,000 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF INDOOR AIR-CONDITIONED MINI AND SELF - STORAGE WAREHOUSE (SIC CODE 4225), AND ADD SELECT CONVENIENCE RETAIL AND SERVICE USES INCLUDING GAS STATIONS AND CAR WASHES TO THE ALLOWED 50,000 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF COMMERCIAL USES. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST INTERSECTION OF LIVINGSTON ROAD AND VETERANS MEMORIAL BOULEVARD IN SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, CONSISTING OF 4.68f ACRES; AND FURTHERMORE, DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE ADOPTED AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PL20220003225] WHEREAS, Collier County, pursuant to Section 163.3161, et. seq., Florida Statutes, the Florida Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, was required to prepare and adopt a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners adopted the Collier County Growth Management Plan on January 10, 1989; and WHEREAS, the Community Planning Act of 2011 provides authority for local governments to amend their respective comprehensive plans and outlines certain procedures to amend adopted comprehensive plans; and WHEREAS, Livingston Veterans Commercial, LLC, requested an amendment to the Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Map and Map Series; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Subsection 163.3187(1), Florida Statutes, this amendment is considered a Small -Scale Amendment; and [22-CMP-01146/1841081/1] 45 PL20220003225 Veterans Memorial GMPA 013124 Pagel of 3 Packet Pg. 27 9.A.1.b WHEREAS, the Subdistrict property is not located in an area of critical state concern or a rural area of opportunity; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) on considered the proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan and recommended approval of said amendment to the Board of County Commissioners; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County did take action in the manner prescribed by law and held public hearings concerning the proposed adoption of the amendment to the Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Map and Map Series of the Growth Management Plan on ; and WHEREAS, all applicable substantive and procedural requirements of law have been met. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: ADOPTION OF AMENDMENT TO THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN The Board of County Commissioners hereby adopts this small-scale amendment to the Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Map and Map Series in accordance with Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes. The text and map amendment are attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION TWO: SEVERABILITY. If any phrase or portion of this Ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion. SECTION THREE: EFFECTIVE DATE. The effective date of this plan amendment, if the amendment is not timely challenged, shall be 31 days after Board approval. If timely challenged, this amendment shall become effective on the date the state land planning agency or the Administration Commission enters a final order determining this adopted amendment to be in compliance. No development orders, development permits, or land uses dependent on this amendment may be issued before it has become effective. [22-CMP-01146/1841081/1] 45 PL20220003225 Veterans Memorial GMPA 013124 Page 2 of 3 Packet Pg. 28 9.A.1.b PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida this day of , 2024. ATTEST: CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legality: Heidi Ashton-Cicko, Managing Assistant County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA mm CHRIS HALL, Chairman Attachment: Exhibit A — Proposed Text Amendment & Map Amendment [22-CMP-01146/1841081/1] 45 PL20220003225 Veterans Memorial GMPA 013124 Page 3 of 3 Packet Pg. 29 Exhibit A 9.A.1.b PL20220003225 EXHIBIT A FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** C. Urban Commercial District 1. Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict 9. Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard Commercial Infill Subdistrict [page 71] T#F&The Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard Commercial Infill Subdistrict consists of approximately 4-4.68 2.25-acres and is located at the southeast corner of the u^+�t;on of -Livingston Road/ any ' vineste. dilE�st to "�aewn a& Veterans' Memorial Boulevard intersection, in Section 13, Township 48 South, Range 25 East; it is depicted on the Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map. The StAbdiStFiGt allows these effiGe uses, FnediGal uses and finaRGial inst tutiens peFFnitted by rigl# i pdffinanee NE) 2004_71). This Subdistrict is designed to provide a variety of commercial uses to serve the surrounding residential and institutional uses within a convenient travel distance to the subject property. It is further designed Development within the Subdistrict is to be compatible with the neighboring residential uses and shall be subject to the following: #1Fough the developmeRt standards provided hereon, along with othep plaRRORg GORsideFatieRs. a. The maximum development intensity allowed is 50,000 square feet of building commercial floor area and 100,000 square feet of indoor self -storage floor area. b. The withith maximum building height is of 3 stories, not to exceed 35 feet zoned height and 45 feet actual height. A""eCs to the nreneFty within the Subdistrict shall only he permitted from Veterans M oriel Be„I ierd There shell he ne en permitted pe�l�cc �rvn-r�cre�iarr��vr e��tr-n�c�,gran-vc-rtv-crcC$S��e�i-csed dirently to er from I iying6ten Rear! c. Allowable uses shall be limited to: 1. Uses permitted by right in the C-1, Commercial Professional and General Office zoning district, as listed in the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended. 2. Amusement and Recreation Services (SIC 7911, 7991, 7999 limited to 4ymnastics, ludo, karate and yoga instruction) 3. Apparel and Accessory Stores (SIC 5611-5699) Page 1 of 4 Words underlined are added; words struck -through are deleted. 1/26/2024 Packet Pg. 30 Exhibit A PL20220003225 9.A.1.b 4. Banks, Credit Unions and Trusts (SIC 6011-6099) 5. Business Services (SIC 7334-7336, 7389 limited to drafting service, interior design, notary, and paralegal services) 6. Candy, Nut and Confectionary Stores (SIC 5441) 7. Carwash (SIC 7542) 8. Convenience Stores (SIC 5441) 9. Eating Places (SIC 5812) 10. Food Stores (SIC 5411-5499) 11. Gasoline Service Stations (SIC 5541) 12. Jewelry Stores (SIC 5944) 13. Membership Organizations (SIC 8611-8651) 14. Miscellaneous Retail (SIC 5992, 5994-5995) 15. Motor freight transportation and warehousing (4225, indoor air-conditioned mini- and self -storage warehousing only) 16. Museums and Art Galleries (SIC 8412) 17. Paint, Glass and Wallpaper Stores (SIC 5231) 18. Personal Services (SIC 7212. 7216. 7219 and 7221) d. Motor freight transportation and warehousing (4225, indoor air-conditioned mini- and self -storage warehousing only) is not eligible for a Comparable Use Determination as defined in the Collier Countv Land Development Code. Page 2 of 4 Words underlined are added; words struck -through are deleted. 1/26/2024 Packet Pg. 31 Exhibit A R25E R26E R 27 r 2012-2025 FUTURE LAND USE MAP Collier County Florda 7111AILS CF7 I R11A-111—,IIIIARE IHOMI ON THE FUTURE LAHD UZE MPTITLED .GCL_IER UOUNTYRURAL &AURICULTIMAL AREA STEWARDSHIP OYERIPV MAP' SUBJECT SITE J 7 R25E I RZOE I R27E PL20220003225 EXABIT"A" P-TITICM PLYM001225 R28 E R29E R30 E R 31 E P32 E R33 E R 24E 0 z--- - ------ =z=7! 7, E M I.— �E .-Ellml— R28 E I R 2.9 E R 30 L R 31 E R32 E R ZJ 1= I R34E Page 3 of 4 Words underlined are added; words struck -through are deleted. 1/26/2024 0 C (D co 0 W C CIA N m O O O CIA N CD LO O ti CIA O (D U C m 0 (D E U m C 0 E Paclket_Pg_ 327 Exhibit A PL20220003225 9.A.1.b DRAFT LIVINGSTON ROAD 1 VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD. COMMERCIAL INFILL SUBDISTRICT COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Fe! cit � j<e,6 SITE LOCATION Veterans Memorial BLVD s= � o w rn � L '' ...J Q ri I ADOPTED-XXXX LEGEND (Ord. Nlo. xxxx) 0 150 300 600 Feet Livingston Road I Veterans Memorial ® BLVD. Commercial Infill Subdistrict Nage 4 OT 4 Words underlined are added; words struck -through are deleted. 1 /26/2024 Packet Pg. 33 9.A.1.c PENINSULA`; ENGINEERING > December 15, 2022 Collier County Growth Management Department Planning & Zoning 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 RE: Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard Commercial lnfill Subdistrict GMP Amendment — PL20220003225 15t Review To Whom It May Concern, The following have been included for your review and approval: 1. Cover Letter 2. Completed Addressing Checklist 3. Pre -Application Meeting Notes 4. GMPA Application 5. Recorded Warranty Deed 6. Affidavit of Authorization 7. Exhibit II: Property Ownership Disclosure Forms 8. Exhibit III.B: Boundary Survey and Legal Description 9. Exhibit IV.B: Proposed Subdistrict Text 10. Exhibit IV.C: Proposed Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Blvd Commercial lnfill Subdistrict Inset Map 11. Exhibit V.A.1: Location Map 12. Exhibit V.A.2: Aerial Map 13. Exhibit V.A.3: Existing Zoning and Land Use Map 14. Exhibit V.B: Existing Future Land Use Map 15. Exhibit V.C: Environmental Data 16. Exhibit V.D: Narrative, Criteria and Consistency 17. Exhibit V.D.1: Commercial Needs Analysis 18. Exhibit V.D.2: Traffic Impact Statement 19. Exhibit V.E: Public Facilities Level of Service Analysis and Map 20. Exhibit V.F.1: FIRM Map 21. Exhibit V.F.2: Wellfield Map 22. Companion PUDZ (PL20220003226) Please feel free to contact me at (239) 403-6727 or by email at cscott@pen-eng.com should you have any questions or require additional information. Oistopher O. Scott, AICP Planning Manager 2600 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, Florida, 34105 Office 239.403.6700 Fax 239.261.1797 Fla Engineer CA 28275 Fla Landscape CA LC26000632 Fla Surveyor/Mapper LB8479 Packet Pg. 34 9.A.1.c co ver County Growth Management Community Development Department ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following and upload via the CityView Portal with your submittal. Items marked with (*) are required for every application, other items are optional and may not apply to every project. Forms are valid for 6 months following their submittal; an updated form will be required for a new submittal after that timeframe and any time the properties within the project boundary are modified. Additional documents may be attached to this form and can include: - * LOCATION MAP and/or SURVEY showing the proposed project boundary. - List of additional folio numbers and associated legal descriptions. - E-mail from Addressing Official for any pre -approved project and/or street names. LOCATION INFORMATION *FOLIO (Property ID) Number(s) of subject property or properties. [Attach list if necessary] 00150080006,00149720005 *LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties. [Attach list if necessary] S13, T48, R25; see attached STREET ADDRESS(ES) where applicable, if already assigned. PROJECT INFORMATION Acceptance of this form does not constitute project and/or street name approval and is subject to further review by the Addressing Official. Pre -Approval may be requested by contacting us at GMD_Add ressing@colliercountyfLgov or 239-252-2482 prior to your submittal. CURRENT PROJECT NAME Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard Commercial Infill Subdistrict PROPOSED PROJECT NAME PROPOSED STREET NAME(s) LATEST APPROVED PROJECT NUMBER [e.g., SDP-94-##, PPL-2002-AR-####, PL2017000####] Addressing Checklist (Rev 10/2022) Page 1 of 1 Operations & Regulatory Management Division • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 • 239-252-2400 www. col I ie rcou ntyfl.gov Packet Pg. 35 Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Site Parcel No 00150080006 Address Site City NAPLES *Disclaimer 9.A.1.c Site Zone 34110 *Note Name/Address LIVINGSTON VETERANS COMMERCIAL 4980 TAMIAMI TR N #201 City NAPLES State I FL Zip 34103 Map No. Strap No. Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3A13 000100 035 3A13 13 48 25 2.39 Legal 13 48 25 SW1/4 OF NW1/4 OF NW1/4 OF NE1/4 LESS LIVINGSTON RD DESC IN iOR 2597 PG 1692 Millage Area O 150 Millage Rates O *Calculations Sub./Condo 100 - ACREAGE HEADER School Other Total Use Code v 99 - ACREAGE NOT ZONED AGRICULTURAL 4.889 6.0293 10.9183 Latest Sales History 2021 Certified Tax Roll (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentialitv) (Subject to Channel Date Book -Page Amount 11/07/20 5857-2468 $ 873,000 12/04/20 5857-2465 $ 0 08/25/05 3876-1546 $ 0 03/08/90 1510-2233 $ 78,500 07/01/88 1365-1684 $ 0 10/01/85 1 1157-2258 1 $ 0 08/01/84 1 1096-619 1 $ 25,000 Land Value $ 597,500 +) Improved Value $ 0 (_) Market Value $ 597,500 (_) Assessed Value $ 597,500 (_) (_) School Taxable Value Taxable Value $ 597,500 $ 597,500 If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Packet Pg. 36 9.A.1.c MAP 912E 9MAU I YMIUM I WiG@ it Introduction it Search for Parcels by it Search Results It Layers it Legend 0 Print Title: Paper Size: Letter (8.5 X 11) v orientation: Landscape v 11, Iy a T I � r; Y r :� - Aerial Year: = m 5: -'. 2022 v Sales Year: k OFF v M M E Aerial Photography: January - 2022 Urban [61N] - 2022 Rural [2FT] - 2022 Rural [1 OFT] - 2022 Rural [SOFT] Packet Pg. 37 Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Site Parcel No 00149720005 Address Site City NAPLES *Disclaimer 9.A.1.c Site Zone 34110 *Note Map No. Strap No. Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3A13 000100 026 3A13 13 48 25 2.16 Legal 13 48 25 NW1/4 OF NW1/4 OF NW1/4 OF NE1/4 LESS LIVINGSTON RD DESC IN OR 2597 PG 1684 Ilage Area O 97 Sub./Condo 100 - ACREAGE HEADER Use Code v 10 - VACANT COMMERCIAL Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book -Page Amount 04/28/20 5758-1612 $ 1,275,000 03/01/11 4656-3169 $ 280,000 02/04/09 4428-1201 $100 09/08/06 4102-435 $ 0 08/08/06 4085-1737 $ 2,000,000 08/22/89 1464-388 $ 105,000 08/01/89 1464-387 $ 67,500 03/01/72 443-681 $ 0 Millage Rates O *Calculations School Other Total 4.889 6.0293 10.9183 2021 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value $ 940,895 +) Improved Value $ 0 (_) Market Value $ 940,895 (_) Assessed Value $ 940,895 (_) (_) School Taxable Value Taxable Value $ 940,895 $ 940,895 If all values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Packet Pg. 38 9.A.1.c MAP 912E 9MAU I YMIUM I WiG@ it Introduction it Search for Parcels by it Search Results It Layers it Legend 0 Print Title: Paper Size: Letter (M X 11) v orientation: Landscape v 11, Aerial Photography: January - 2022 Urban [61N] - 2022 Rural [2FT] - 2022 Rural [10FT] - 2022 Rural [SOFT] Zgom in Zoom OUI Idwtify Part Maasur8 Full County VVew Aerial Year: 2022 v Sales Year: OFF v Packet Pg. 39 9.A.1.c Gv er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliercountyfl.eov (239) 252-2400 Pre -Application Meeting Notes Petition Type: Rezone to a PUP (PUDZ) Date and Time: Wednesday 5 / 15 / 2 2 SF�lM }ffntm OV Assigned Planner: � - PUDZ Rachel Hansen - Companion GMPA Engineering Manager (for PPL's and FP's): Project Information Project Name: Liviingston Rd/Vetran's Memorial Blvd Commercial Infill Subdist PL20220003226 - PUDZ (PUDZ) PL#: PL20220003225 - GMPA 1500$0006 Agricultural & C--1 Property ID #: 149720005 Current Zoning: Project Address: City: Naples State: FL Zip: 34110 Applicant: Kim Davidson, Peninsula Engineering Agent Name: Christopher Scott, AICP Phone: 239-403-6700 Agent/Firm Address: 2600 Golden Gate PKWYCity: Naples State: FL Zip:34105 Property Owner: Livingston Veterans Commercial LLC#201 -Parcel#149720005 Livingston Veterans Commercial - Parcel#150080005 Please provide the fallowing, if applicable: i. Total Acreage 4.55 ii. Proposed ## of Residential Units: iii. Proposed Commercial Square Footage: 50, 000-Commercial&100, 000 Indoor Self Storage iv. For Amendments, indicate the original petition number: V. If there is an Ordinance or Resolution associated with this project, please indicate the type and number: vi. If the project is within a Plat, provide the name and AR#/PL#: Updated 1/12/2021 Page I 1 of 5 Packet Pg. 40 Gayer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE L GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34144 > a) www.calliercountyfl.gov (239) 252-2400 M 0 m Meeting Notes •L 0 E As of 10/26/2017 all Zoning applications have revised applications, and your associated Application is included in your notes; additionally a *new Property Ownership Disclosure Form is required for all applications. A copy of this new form is included in your pre-app as Note — link is httpS://www.colliercountyfl.qov/Home/ShowDocument?id=75093 � ns 0 c 0 % 7 .Qmt. Lt w1.r > J u7 N N f7 M f ►� U ! z� Y'If 1 L►Vi'Eyt-'�� Cr�kriiL N�fi �� _ i".� C; �� Q O O yk� N %J O J t&,j i u� `u� 5 a M 1i L0 1-�I�MIJeIUI�-�u%G 49 -0— Q e L AC . �fr• .C. ac% - c� N C CD 1' kRGi L l T t,&5 r .s e,.1 iv A.L r r� — �3 /y �] / U -J e N ;V+ ��rL-r+o aliF N +�� L'c:[. C�.2.L aL4. tLf�G go V m U a. U U c 0. a If Site is within the City of Naples Water Service Area please send to Naples Utilities and Planning Departments. Then, if the Q petition is submitted, we are to send it (by email) to the four persons below in their Utilities and Planning Depts. - along with � a request that they send us a letter or email of "no objection" to the petition. Bob Middleton RMiddleton�a7naolesoov.com Allyson Holland AMHolland na les ov.com Robin Singer RSinger() aplesoov.com Erica Martin emartin na les ov.com E t U Disclaimer: Information provided by staff to applicant daring the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available r data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. Q The Administrative Code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy- Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline whar is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide ail d required data. E z U 0 r Q Updated 1/12/2021 Page 1 2 of 5 Packet Pg. 41 9.A.1.c ThomasClarkeVEN From: Sammon5ean Sent: Monday, June 20, 2022 5:05 PM To: ThomasClarkeVEN Subject: FW: PL20220003226 - PUDZ Tom, Please include Ray's email for the Zoning Pre-App notes for the Livingston PUDZ. Thank you Respectfully, Sean Sammon, Principal Planner Zoning Division - Zoning Services Section Sea n.5a m m on @ Col I ie rCo u ntvF L. eov Phone: 239.252.8422; Fax: 239,252,6350 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL 34104 COfP7CV C 014 t y Grovvth Management IDepartrnent Exceeding expectations, every day! Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zonings Division Survey at https.//gaa.gVeXjvgT From: BellowsRay<Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfLgov> Sent: Monday, June 20, 2022 4:57 PM To: Sammon5ean <Sean.Sammon@coliiercountyfl.gov> Subject: RE: PL20220003226 - PUDZ Hi Sean, The LDC doesn't provide a conversion ratio for these uses. They should just provide a maximum trip generation cap to regulate the intensity of this project. The trip cap allows for greater flexibility with the mix of commercial uses without the need to provide a conversion ratio. Respectfully, Raymond V. Bellows, Zoning Manager Zoning Division - Zoning Services Section Growth Management Department Telephone:239,252.2463; Fax: 239.252.6350 Ca��Fer Caurety Exceeding expectations, every day! f6,-1 Packet Pg. 42 9.A.1.c Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at https:llgoo.glleXrVq . From: SammonSean <Sean.Sammon colliercount fl. ova Sent: Wednesday, June 1S, 2022 4:33 PM To: BeilowsRay <Ra .Bellows colliercount fl, ova Subject: PL20220003226 - PUDZ Ray, During the PUDZ/GMPA Livingston Rd/Veteran's Memorial Blvd Pre-App today, the agent mentioned that they're proposing a 50,004 SF non-residential commercial and/or 100,000 SF Self -Storage facility. We mentioned that the total size needs to be committed/specified. What I'm uncertain about is where they determined that they're using a conversion ratio of 2:1 (2 SF of Self -Storage for every 1 SF of the non-res commercial). I asked Eric if he knows where they came to the ratio but he's uncertain. Do you know if that ratio is in the LDC? Or where they possibly arrived to that? I'm uncertain myself. Respectfully, Sean Sammon, Principal Planner Zoning Division - Zoning Services Section Sean .Sa m m on @ Co I l ie rCo u ntyF L.gov Phone: 239.252.8422; Fax: 239,252.6350 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL 34104 Coter y Growth Management Department Exceeding expectations, every day! Tell us how we are doing ,by taking our Zoning Division Survey at htt s: oo. 1 eXiv T. Under Florida Law. e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Packet Pg. 43 9.A.1.c Sean Sammon, Principal Planner 7-0,v 1OJ (] *--J June 15, 2022 PL20220003226 - PUDZ PL20220003225 - GMPA LIVINGSTON RD/VETERAN'S MEMORIAL BLVD COMMERCIAL INFILL SUBDISTRICT (PUDZ) DESCRIPTION OF WORK A. 5E Corner of intersection of Livingston & Veteran's Memorial Blvd B. Less than 5 AC {±4.55 AC} C. According to FLU: a. The northern parcel (2.16 AC} -> COMM SUB b. The southern parcel {2.39 AQ -> UR c. Landlocked together by the multifamily project D. Sounded by Stock Family— Allura to the east and south/ single family around and afire station to the south E. Restricted to C-1 usage, access off of Veteran's Memorial F. Will expand district and uses such as gas station, indoor self -storage (based on a conversion ratio) a. More frontage along Livingston RD b. 15% preserve, south adjacent to multifamily ZONING A. Access aff of Livingston and Veteran's Memorial both egress & ingress B. One interconnection to Allura C. Uses: a. Convenience b. Restaurants c. Fitness d. C-1 uses and add SIC codes Packet Pg. 44 9.A.1.c D. PU❑ a. Setbacks will be determined with the submittal of the master concept plan b. Proposed size is SO,OD0 SF ANDjOR 100,000 SF, this will need to be specified i. 50,000 SF non-residential ii. 100,000 SF self -storage c. Self -storage based on a "2:1" conversion ratio (2 Self -Storage to i retail) d. Overall size must be committed e. Height & size, no changes, not increasing height requirement or commercial SF from LDC f. Neighboring PU❑ Ordinance 19-22, page 4 states 'interconnection to adjacent commercial parcel may be relocated in the event the adjacent AG parcel is rezoned to commercial" i. Agent: Allura was designed and thought of to connect both pieces [of land, Allura & this PUDZ] in the future. Allura is already committed and being developed EXTRA PERTAINING INFORMATION A. 10% preserve required (0.45 AC) —off-site B. GIS FLU map has a glitch C. Alcohol sales in the convenience store needs to abide to proximity of schools, no on -site consumption a. Agent: No liquor stores proposed as use and convenience store will abide by state alcohol sales standards GOING FORWARD A. PUDZ/GMPA will have a combined NIM B. 1 CCPC hearing C. 1 BCC hearing PL20220003226 - PUD2 0 PL2022000322S - GMPA Q LIVINGSTON RD/VETERAN'S MEMORIAL BLVD COMMERCIAL INFILL SUBDISTRICT (PUDZ) Page-2 of 2 n 1J' Packet Pg. 45 9.A.1.c ThomasClarkeVEN From: HansenRachel Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2022 9:22 AM To: ThomasClarkeVEN Cc: SammonSean Subject: PL20220003225 - Livingston Road/Veteran's Memorial Boulevard Commercial Infill Subdistrict Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Hi Tom, Below are my pre-app notes for Livingston/Veterans Memorial Commercial Infill GMPA. • List and address Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.6 and Policies 7.1-7.4 as applicable. • List and address applicable provisions of Florida Statues 163.3177 for amending the GMP. ■ Provide a market study demonstrating the demand for the various uses (self -storage, gasoline service station, retail, etc) at the proposed location. The market study should include an inventory of all zoned and/or designated property that could potentially accommodate the proposed uses, as well as an inventory of existing uses, in a 1, 3, and 5 mile radius. • Provide line of sight renderings from pedestrian perspective for proposed design from south and east (where multi -family abuts proposed project). Thankyou! Rachel Hansen Principal Planner Planning & Zoning Division Rachel. Hansen.acolliercountvi'Loov 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1442 Cot r Comnty "Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at http_s:l/goc.cII/e__XivgT." Information contained in this email is subject to verification by the Zoning Manager and/or Planning Director; if this information is being used as a basis for the purchase/lease of a property or as a guide for the design of a project, it is recommended that a Zoning Verification Letter or Zoning Certificate Application is submitted to zoning services. Applications For a Zoning Verification Letter can be found here: https://www.coiliercount.fI. ov horse showdocument?id-69624 Zoning Certificate applications can be found here: htt s: www.colliercount fl. ov our- overnment divisions-f-r ❑ erations- re ulato -mans ement zoninr -or- I and - use-app Iication zonin -othe r- I and - use -applications Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead. contact this office by telephone or in writing. Packet Pg. 46 9.A.1.c ThomasClarkeVEN From: Beard Laurie Sent: Monday, June 13, 2022 3:40 PM To: SammonSean Cc: ThomasCiarkeVEN Subject: Pre -Application Meeting PL20220003226 - Livingston Road/Veteran's Memorial Boulevard Commercial Infill Subdistrict (PUDZ) Attachments: Transportation-PUD monitoring pre app handout 2020.docx Attached are the pre-app notes for PUD Monitoring. LaGirie Beard Project Manager Please note new address: PUD Monitoring. GMD 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples.. FL 34104 Laurie. Beard _CollierCountvFL.aov Phone:(239)-252-5782 V4�WER�Ca� V V SINCE V Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address reteased in response to public, records request. do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead. contact this office by telephone or in writing_ Packet Pg. 47 9.A.1.c Transportation Planning and PUD Monitoring Pre-App Notes Developer Commitments: Transportation Planning " The maximum total daily trip generation for the PUD shall not exceed two-way PM peak hour net trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDPISDPA or subdivision plat approval." Use Codes Provide both ITE and SIC use codes in the TIS. PUD Monitoring "One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close- out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this CPUD approval, the Managing Entity is the insert Company Name Here. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shaII become the Managing Entity, As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the CPUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed -out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments." Miscellaneous "Pursuant to Section 125.022(5) F.S., issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. A]I other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development." ��. Packet Pg. 48 9.A.1.c ThomasClarkeVEN From: SawyerMichael Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2022 1:55 PM To: ThomasClarkeVEN; HansenRachel; SammonSean Subject: Livingston Road/Veteran's Memorial Boulevard Commerical Infill Pre App meeting notes Thomas, Please check the TIS required box on the pre app checklist as well as methodology on the next page with a note that methodology will be by email to staff. Please also add the following notes: Transportation Planning: Methodology meeting by email required and provide note on TIS cover sheet that fee will be collected at time of GMPA/PUDZ submittal. Address all transportation eiements of the GMP. Provide both ITE and SIC use codes in the TIS. Provide trip limit based on TIS using standard language: "The maximum total daily trip generation for the PUD shall not exceed two-way PM peak hour net trips based on the Use codes in the 1TF Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPR or subdivision plat approval. " Also provide interconnection commitment using standard language. Veteran's access may not be possible due to intersection improvements scheduled with the expansion of the west roadway improvements. Access will be addressed at methodology with additional staff members. Respectfully, Michael Sawyer Project Manager Transportation Management Services Department Transportation Planning 26$5 South Horseshoe Drive, Suite 103 Naples, Florida 34104 239-252-2926 michae1.sawyerC4�i,'col I iercountNefl.gov Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you d❑ not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do riot send eiectronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Packet Pg. 49 r COT CoMMty 9.A.1.c COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliercountvfl.gov (239) 252-2400 Meeting Notes G V11tV,1 v *',L1 A L - Ly i}l!s - ,4v 7yQ•a �Lj4 tL. (V0 e_kC_ tj 0A, PL970,-a — see �wc� I L. /u r, 3: Q. Other required documentation for submittal (not listed on application): Disclaimer; Information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required data. Updated 1/12/2021 Page 1 3 of 5 Packet Pg. 50 9.A.1.c ThomasClarkeVEN From: BrownCraig Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2022 2:05 PM To: ThomasClarkeVEN Subject: RE: Pre-App Research for Livingston Rd/Vet's Memorial Blvd -Commercial Infill Subdistrict - PL20220003226 & Companion GMPA PL20220003225 Attachments: Environmental data Checklist updated December 2016.doc; PUDZ-PUDA checklist FOR REViEWERS 2-2017.doc Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Thomas, Here are my notes for this one. Please provide Environmental Data: Please provide FLUCFCS aerial map of the subject property please include the invasive exotic plant percentage amounts and indicate which FLUCFCS are being considered Native Vegetation. Identify on a current aerial the acreage, location and community types of all upland and wetland habitats on the project site, according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS), and provide a legend for each of the FLUCFCS Codes identified. Aerials and overlay information must be legible at the scale provided. Provide calculations far the acreage of native vegetation required to be retained on -site. In a separate report, demonstrate how the preserve selection criteria pursuant to 3.05.07 have been met. Where applicable, include In this report an aerial showing the project boundaries along with any undeveloped land, preserves, natural flowways or other natural land features, located on abutting properties. �. Please provide a current Listed species survey, which should include listed plants forthe subject property. Provide supporting exhibits (i.e. Panther zones ect.) be sure to include Black Bear, and Florida Bonneted Bat as part of the evaluation. Provide a wildlife survey for the nests of bald eagle and for listed species known to inhabit biological communities similar to those existing on -site. The survey shall be conducted in accordance with the guidelines or recommendations of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) and the U.S. Fiso and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Provide a survey for listed plants identified in 3.04.03. 3. Provide calculations on -site plan showing the appropriate acreage of native vegetation to be retained, the max amount and ratios permitted to be created ❑n-site or mitigated off -site. Exclude vegetation located wlthin utility and drainage easernents from the preserve calculations (LDC 3.05.07.E-D; 3.05,07.F; 3.05.07.H.1.d- e). preservation. (10% preservation .) 4Please address how the proposed project is consistent with Conservation Coastal Management Element (CCME) Policy 6.1 and Objective 7.1. 5. Explain flow the project meets or exceeds the native vegetation requirements and minimizes impacts to listed species as required in the CCME. 6. Indicate how the project design minimizes impacts to listed species. Describe the measures that are proposed as mitigation for impacts to listed species. (if found ❑nsite). 7. Indicate wetlands to be impacted and the effects of the impact to their functions and how the project's design cornpensates for wetland impacts., if applicable. Packet Pg. 51 9.A.1.c Please Check off $2500 Environmental Data Fee. Craig Brown Principal Environmental Specialist Development Review Division (239) 252-2548. How are we doing? Please CLICK HERE to fill out a Customer Survey. We appreciate your Feedback! From: ThomasClarkeVEN <Thomas.Clarke@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2022 12:05 PM To: AshtonHeidi <Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov7; Beard Laurie <Laurie.9eard@colliercountyfl.gov>; BrownCraig <Craig.Brown@colliercountyfl.gov7; Cook]aime <Jaime.Cook@colliercountyfl.gov>; CrotteauKathyneli <KathyneII.Crotteau@coI!iercountyfl.gov>; PerryDerek <Derek.Perry@ coifiercountyfl.gov>; FauIknerSue <Sue.Faulkner@colliercountyfl.kav7; CastroGabriela <Gabriela.Castro@co!liercountyfl.gov>; SantabarbaraGino <Gino.Santabarbara@coiIiercoun fl.gov�; RaineyJenniferA <JenniferA.Rainey@coIIiercountyfl.gov>; MoscaMicheIe EMichele.Mosca@coIIiercountyl >; orthRichard Richard.orth@colliercountyfl.gov>; KlopfParker <Parker.Klopf@colliercountyfl.gov>; hkar5aIly<SaIly.Ashkar@col Iiercountyfl.gov>; SawyerMichaeI Michael.Sawyer@co!liercountyfi.gov>; empletonMark <Mark.Templeton,@colliercountyfi.gov> Cc: SammonSean <Sean.Sammon@collier untyfl.gov>; HansenRachel <Rachel.Hansen@colliercountyfl.gov>; ortmanEric <Eric.ortman@co!liercountyfl.g > Subject: Pre-App Research for Livingston Rd/ is Memorial Blvd -Commercial Infill Subdistrict-PL20220003226 & Companion GMPA PL20220003225 Good Afternoon All, Please review the attached Zoning Rr6-App Research for Livingston Rd Vet's 11 Memorial Blvd -Commercial Infill gubdist ict[PUDZi-PL20220003226. and Companion GMPA-PL 225. The virtual meeting for botK is tomorrow, We nesda fi 15 Meeting7 (22 at 1:30PM- ZOOM .......................................................... . �@................ Topic: Pre --Application Meeting PL20220003226& 312 - Livingston Road/Veteran's ti Memorial Boulevard Cbmmercial Infill 5ubdistrict(PUD &(GMPA) Time: Jun 151, 2022 01:30 PM Eastern Time (U5 and Canada) Join Zoom Meeting: https:lZus02web.zoom.us/i/82292541275 a Z �-3 Packet Pg. 52 9.A.1.c Environmental PUDZ-PUDA Checklist (non-IItFMU) Project Name I. Is the project is in compliance with the overlays, districts and/or zoning on the subject site and/or the surrounding properties? (CON, ST, PUD, RLSA, RFMU, etc.) (LDC 2.03.05-2,03.08; 4.08.00) Not in CV Library 2. Submit a current aerial photograph (available from the Property Appraiser's office) and clearly delineate the subject site boundary lines. If the site is vegetated, provide FLUCFCS overlay and vegetation inventory identifying upland, wetland and exotic vegetation (Admin. Code Ch. 3 G.1. Application Contents #24). FLUCFCS Overlay -P627 3. Clearly identify the location of all preserves and label each as "Preserve" on all plans. (LDC 3.05.07.H.1). Preserve Label- P546 4. Provide calculations on site plan showing the appropriate acreage of native vegetation to be retained, the max. amount and ratios permitted to be created on -site or mitigated off -site. Exclude vegetation located within utility and drainage easements from the preserve calculations (LDC 3.05.07.B-D; 3.05.071; 3.05.07.H. I A-e). Preserve Calculation - P547 5. Created and retained preserve areas shall meet the minimum width requirements per LDC 3.05.07.H.1.b. Preserve Width - P603 6. Retained preservation areas shall be selected based on the criteria defined in LDC 3.05.07.A.3, include all 3 strata, be in the largest contiguous area possible and shall be interconnected within the site and to adjoining off -site preservation areas or wildlife corridors. tLDC 3.05.07.A.1-4) Preserve Selection- P550 7. Principle structures shall be located a minimum of 25' from the boundary of the preserve boundary. No accessory structures and other site alterations, fill placement, grading, plant alteration or removal, or similar activity shall be permitted. within 10' of the boundary unless it can be shown that it will not affect the integrity of the preserve (i.e. stem wall or berm around wetland preserve). Provide cross -sections for each preserve boundary identifying all site alterations within 25'. (LDC 3.05.07.H.3; 6.01.02.C.) Preserve Setback —New 8. Wildlife survey required for sites where an EIS is not required, when so warranted. (LDC 10.02.02.A.2.f) Listed Species - P522 9. Provide Environmental Data identifying author credentials, consistency determination with the GMPs, off -site preserves, seasonal and historic high water levels, and analysis of water quality. For land previously used for farm fields or golf course, provide soil sampling/groundwater monitoring reports identifying any site contamination. (LDC 3.08.00) Environmental Data Required. -- P 522 10. PUD Document and Master plan shall state the minimum acreage required to be preserved. (LDC 10.02.13.A.2) Master Plan Contents-P625 11. If the PUD includes a Preserve Tract section UP FOR DISCUSSION — DISCUSS WITH CAO When listing preserve uses, the following is suggested: A. Principal Use: Preserve; B. Accessory Uses: All other uses (list as applicable or refer to the LDC — to below as typical uses listed by agents) {ensure the text states "subject to LDC section related to Allowable uses within County required presences" Alternate format: A. Uses subject to LDC section Allowable uses within County required preserves: 1. Nature trails that do not reduce the amount of required preserve. 2. Passive Recreation uses, as per LDC requirements. 3. Stormwater only when in accordance with the LDC. Qf�}L%-- Packet Pg. 53 9.A.1.c PUD Commitments and. Site Plan notes Where preserves occur adjacent to development off site and will be used in lieu of landscape buffers, include the following condition in the environmental commitments section of the PUD document or master plan: Preserves may be used to satisfy the landscape buffer requirements after exotic vegetation removal in accordance with LDC sections 4.06.02 and 4.06.05.E.I. Supplemental plantings with native plant materials shall be in accordance with LDC section 3.05.07, 12. PUD Document shall identify any listed species found on site and,'or describe any unique vegetative features that will be preserved on the site. (LDC 10.02.13.A.2.) Unique Features- P628 Example: A management plan for the entire project shah be submitted in accordance with the requirements and procedures of the LDC for listed species including but not limited to Black Bear, Gopher Tortoise and listed birds. The management plan shall be submitted prior to development of the first phase of the project. 13. Review cross -sections if provided; they are not required with the PUD. However, sometimes they are provided. Is there any fill proposed in the preserve? Additional Comments: PA-c-Packet Pg. 54 9.A.1.c Environmental Data Checklist Project Name The Environmental Data requirements can be found in LDC Section 3.08.00 Provide the EIS fee if PUD or CU. WHO AND WHAT COMPANY PREPARED THE ENVIRONMENTAL DATA REPORT? Preparation of Environmental Data. Environmental Data Submittal Requirements shall be prepared by an individual with academic credentials and experience in the area of environmental sciences or natural resource management. Academic credentials and experience shall be a bachelor's or higher degree in one of the biological sciences with at least two years of ecological or biological professional experience in the State of Florida. Please include revision dates on resubmittals. Identify on a current aerial, the location and acreage of all SFWMD jurisdictional wetlands according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS) and include this information on the SDP or final plat construction plans. Wetlands must be verified by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) or Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) prior to SDP or final plat construction plans approval. For sites in the RF1V U district, provide an assessment in accordance with 3.05.07 F and identify on the FLL:CFCS map the location of all high quality wetlands (wetlands having functionality scores of at least 0.65 WRAP or 0.7 UMAM) and their location within the proposed development plan. Sites with high quality wetlands must have their functionality- scores verified by the SFWMD or DEP prior to first development order approval. Where functionality scores have not been verified by either the SFWMD or DEP, scores must be reviewed and accepted by County staff,, consistent with State regulation. 4. SDP or final plat construction plans with impacts to five (5) or more acres of wetlands shall provide an analysis of potential water quality impacts of the project by evaluating water quality loadings expected from the project (post development conditions considering the proposed land uses and stormwater management controls) compared with water quality loadings of the project area as it exists in its pre -development conditions. The analysis shall be performed using methodologies approved by Federal and State water quality agencies, and must demonstrate no increase in nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorous) loadings in the post development scenario. 5. Where treated stormwater is allowed to be directed into preserves, show how the criteria in 3.05.07 H have been met. 6. Where native vegetation is retained on site, provide a topographic map to a half foot and, where possible. provide elevations within each of the FLUCFCS Codes identified on site. For SDP or final plat construction plans, include this information on the site plans. Provide a wildlife survey for the nests of bald eagle and for listed species known to inhabit biological communities similar to those existing on site. The survey shall be conducted in accordance with the guidelines or recommendations of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Survey times may be reduced or waived where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low, as determined by the FFWCC and USFWS. Where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low, the survey time may be reduced or waived by the County Manager or designee, when the project is not reviewed or technical assistance not provided by the FFWCC and USFWS. Additional survey time may be required if listed species are discovered 8. Provide a survey for listed plants identified in 3.04.03 9. Wildlife habitat management and monitoring plans in accordance with 3.04.00 shall be required where listed species are utilizing the site or where wildlife habitat management and monitoring plans are required by the FFWCC or USFWS. These plans shall describe how the project directs incompatible land uses away from listed species and their habitats. identify the location of listed species nests, burrows, dens, foraging areas, and the Packet Pg. 55 9.A.1.c location of any bald eagle nests or nest protection zones on the native vegetation aerial with FLUCFCS overla for the site. Wildlife habitat management plans shall be included on the SDP or final plat construction plans. Bald eagle management plans are required for sites containing bald eagle nests or nest protection zones, copies of which shall be included on the SDP or final plat construction plans. 10. For sites or portions of sites cleared of native vegetation or in agricultural operation, provide documentation that the parcel(s) were issued a permit to be cleared and are in compliance with the 25 year rezone limitation pursuant to section 10-02-06. For sites permitted to be cleared prior to July 2003, provide documentation that the parcels) are in compliance with the 10 year rezone limitation previously identified in the GMP. Criteria defining native vegetation and determining the legality, process and criteria for clearing are found in 3.05.05, 3.05.07 and 10.02.06. 11. identify on a current aerial the acreage, location and community types of all upland and wetland habitats on the project site, according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS). and provide a legend for each of the FLUCFCS Codes identified. Aerials and overlay information must be legible at the scale provided. Provide calculations for the acreage of native vegetation required to be retained on -site. Include the above referenced calculations and aerials on the SDP or final plat construction plans. in a separate report, demonstrate how the preserve selection criteria pursuant to 3.05.07 have been met. Where applicable, include in this report an aerial showing the project boundaries along with any undeveloped land, preserves, natural flowways or other natural land features. located on abutting properties. 12. Include on a separate site plan, the project boundary and the land use designations and overlays for the RLSA, RFMU, ST and ACSC-ST districts. Include this information on the SDP or final plat construction plans- 13. Where off -site preservation of native vegetation is proposed in lieu of on -site, demonstrate that the criteria in section 3.05.07 have been met and provide a note on the SDP or final plat construction plans indicating the type of donation (monetary payment or land donation) identified to satisfy the requirement. include on the SDP or final plat construction plans, a location map(s) and property identification number(s) of the off -site parcei(s) if off -site donation of land is to occur. 14. Provide the results of any Environmental Assessments and/or Audits of the property, along with a narrative of the measures needed to remediate if required by FDEP. 15. Soil and/or Zz around water sampling shall be required at the time of first development order submittal for sites that occupy farm fields (crop fields, cattle dipping ponds, chemical mixing areas), golf courses, landfill or junkyards or for sites where hazardous products exceeding 250 gallons of liquid or 1,000 pounds of solids were stored or processed or where hazardous wastes in excess of 220 pounds per month or 110 gal Ions at any point in time were generated or stored. The amount of sampling and testing shall be determined by a registered professional with experience in the field of Environmental Site Assessment and shall at a minimum test for organochlorine pesticides (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 8081) and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) 8 metals using Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) soil sampling Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) FS 3000, in areas suspected of being used for mixing and at discharge point of water management system. Sampling should occur randomly if no points of contamination are obvious. Include a background soil analysis from an undeveloped location hydraulically upgradient of the potentially contaminated site. Soil sampling should occur just below the root zone, about 6 to 12 inches below ground surface or as otherwise agreed upon with the registered professional with experience in the field of Environmental Site Assessment. include in or with the Environmental Site Assessment, the acceptable State and Federal pollutant levels for the types of contamination found on site and indicate in the Assessment, when the contaminants are over these levels. If this analysis has been done as part of an Environmental Audit then the report shall be submitted, The County shall coordinate with the FDEP where contamination exceeding applicable FDEP standards is identified on site or where an Environmental Audit or Environmental Assessment has been submitted. 16. Shoreline development must provide an analysis demonstrating that the project will remain fully functional for its intended use after a six-inch rise in sea level. �6 Packet Pg. 56 9.A.1.c 17. Provide justification for deviations from environmental LDC provisions pursuant to GMP CCME Policy 6.1. i (13), if requested. 18. Where applicable, provide evidence of the issuance of all applicable federal and/or state oil and gas permits for proposed oil and gas activities in Collier County. Include all state permits that comply with the requirements of Chapter 52C-25 through 52C-30, F.A.C., as those rules existed on January 13, 2005. 19. Identify any Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones (WRM-ST) within the project area and provide an analysis for how the project design avoids the most intensive land uses within the most sensitive N RM-STs and will comply with the WRM-ST pursuant to 3.06.00. Include the location of the Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones on the SDP or final plat construction plans. For land use applications such as standard and PUD rezones and CUs, provide a separate site plan or zoning map with the project boundary and Welifield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones identified. 20. Demonstrate that the design of the proposed stormwater management system and analysis of water quality and quantity impacts fully incorporate the requirements of the Watershed Management regulations of 3.07.00. 21. For sites located in the Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern -Special Treatment overlay district (ACSC- ST), show how the project is consistent with the development standards and regulations in 4.02.14. 22. For multi -slip docking facilities with ten slips or more, and for all marina facilities, show how the project is consistent with 5.05.02. Refer to the Manatee Protection Plan for site specific requirements of the Manatee Protection Pian not included in 5.05.02. 23. For development orders within RFMU sending lands, show how the project is consistent with each of the applicable Objectives and Policies of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the GMP. 24. The County Manager or designee may require additional data or information necessary to evaluate the project's compliance with LDC and GMP requirements. (LDC 10.02.02.A.33 f) The following to be determined at preappiication meeting: (Choose those that apply) a. Provide overall description of project with respect to environmental and water management issues. b. Explain now project is consistent with each of the applicable objectives and policies in the CCME of the GMP. c. Explain how the project meets or exceeds the native vegetation preservation requirement in the CCME and LDC. d. Indicate wetlands to be impacted and the effects of the impact to their functions and how the project's design compensates for wetland impacts. e. Indicate how the project design minimizes impacts to listed species. Describe the measures that are proposed as mitigation for impacts to listed species. 25. PUD zoning and CU petitions. For PUD rezones and CU petitions. applicants shall collate and package applicable Environmental Data Submittal Requirements into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) document, prior to public hearings and after all applicable staff reviews are complete. Copies of the EIS shall be provided to the County Manager or designee prior to public hearings. 25. Is EAC Review (by CCPC) required? Packet Pg. 57 9.A.1.c 27. PUD master plan or PPL/SDP site plan notes: Where preserves occur adjacent to development off site and will be used in lieu of landscape buffers, include the following condition in the environmental commitments section of the PUD document. Preserves may be used to satisfy the landscape buffer requirements after exotic vegetation removal in accordance with LDC sections 4.06.02 and 4.06.05.E.1. Supplemental plantings with native plant materials shall be in accordance with LDC section 3.05.07, 28. Additional comments 29. Stipulations for approval (Conditions) �, Packet Pg. 58 9.A.1.c ThomasClarkeVEN From: Sent: To: Subject: Follow Up Flag Flag Status: TempletonMark Wednesday, lone 15, 2022 2:07 PM ThomasCla rkeVEN RE: Pre-App Research for Livingston Rd/Vet's Memorial Blvd -Commercial Infill Subdistrict - PL20220003226 & Companion GMPA PL20220003225 Fallow up Flagged Hi Thomas, Below are the landscape notes for the PUD2 Label buffers on the master plan per the LDC unless specific buffer requirements are part of the GMPA. LDC required buffers are 15' Type D along the North and West. East buffer is a Type A extending 340' South from Veterans Memorial Blvd. The remaining portion of the East buffer is a Type B. Type B buffer along the South, if the preserve is located where a Type B buffer is required, show a 6' wide reservation along the preserve. Include the following note about the preserve satisfying the buffer requirement: Preserves may be used to satisfy the landscape buffer requirements after exotic vegetation removal in accordance with 4.06.02 and 4.06.05.E.1. Supplemental plantings with native plant materials shall be in accordance with LDC section 3.05.07. In order to meet the requirements of a Type 'B' buffer, a 6-foot-wide landscape buffer reservation is provided outside of the preserve as shown on the Master Plan. In the event that the preserve does not meet the buffer requirements after removal of exotics and supplemental planting within the preserve, plantings will be provided in the 6' wide reservation to meet the buffer requirements. The type, site and number of such plantings, if necessary, will be determined at time of initial SDP or plat and included on the landscape plans far the SDP or plot. Respectfully, Mark Templeton, RLA Principal Planner/Landscape Review Co Ter COUnty Development Review Division Exceeding Expectations. Every Day[ NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples Florida 34104 Phone: 239.252,2475 How are we doing? Please CLICK HERE to fill out a Customer Survey. We appreciate your Feedback! Disclaimer- this email is not to be interpreted as an endorsement or approval of any permit, plan, project, or deviation from the Land Development Code. G f Packet Pg. 59 Coder Count COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.coiliercountyfl.gov (239) 252-2400 Pre -Application Meeting Sign -In Sheet PL# 20220003226 & 20220003225 Collier County Contact Information: 9.A.1.c Name Review Discipline Phone Email ❑ Maggie Acevedo North Collier Fire 252-2309 macevedu@northcollierfire.com C1 Steve Baluch Transportation Planning 252-2361 stephen.baluch@colliercountyfl.gov Ci Shar A.Beddow MSM/Deputy Fire Marshal - Greater Naples Fire 241-1422 sbeddow@gnfire.org L Ray Bellows Zoning, Planning Manager 252-2463 raymond.bellows@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Laurie Beard PUD Monitoring 252-5782 laurie.beard@colliercountyfl,gov Craig Brown Environmental Specialist 252-2548 craig.brown @cclliercountyfLgov Heidi Ashton Cickc Managing Asst. County Attorney 252-8773 heldi.ashton@coiliercountyfl.gov Thomas Clarke Zoning Operations Analyst 252-2584 thomas.carke@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jamie Cook Development Review Director 252-6290 Jaime.cook@colliercountyfl.gov C Gabriel@ Castro Zoning Principal Planner 252-4211 gabriela.ca5tro@cclliercountyfl.gov [i Maggie DeMe❑ • North Collier Fire 252-2 pdemeo@northcollierfire.com ❑ E•E• Utility Planning 252II137 ericey@colliercountyfi.gov ❑ Tim Finn, AICP Zoning Principal Planner 2S2-4312 timothy,finn@colliercountyfl.gov Ll Sue Faulkner GMP - Comprehensive Planning 252-5715 sue.faulkner@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Michael Gibbons Structurai/Residential Plan Review 252-2426 michael,gibbons@colliercountyfl.gov Storm Gewlrtz, P,E. Engineering 5tormwater 252-2434 storm.gewirtz@colliercountyfl.gov Cormac Gibiin, AICP Development Review -Planning Manager 252-5095 Cormac.giblin@colliercountyfl.gov IJ Nancy Gundlach, AICP Zoning Principal Planner 252-2484 nancy-gundlach@colliercountyfl.gov Rachel Hansen GMP — Comprehensive Planning 252-1142 Rachel.hansen@colliercountyfl.gov _ Richard Henderiong Zoning Principal Planner 252-2464 richard.henderlong@col liercountyfl.gov F Jahn Houldsworth Engineering Subdivision 252-5757 john.houldsworth@coiliercountyfl.gov �.- Alicia Humphries Right -Of -Way Permitting 252-2326 alicia.humphries@colliercountyfl.gov ]_i Anita Jenkins Planning & Zoning Director 252-5095 Anita-jenkins@colliercountyfl.gov John Kelly Zoning Senior Planner 252-5719 john.kelly@coliiercountyfl.gov Ll Parker Klopf GMP — Comprehensive Planning 252-2471 Parker.klopf@colliercountyfl.gov P Troy Komarowski North Collier Fire 252-2521 tkomarowski@northcallierfire.com 1 1 Sean Lintz North Collier Fire 597-9227 Blintz@northcollierfire.com ❑ Diane Lynch Operations Analyst 252-8243 diane.lynch@colliercourityfl.gov [ Thomas Mastroberto Greater Naples Fire 252-7348 thomas-mastroberto@colliercountyfi.gov Jack McKenna, P.E. Engineering Services 252-2911 jack.mckenna@colliercountyfl.gov Updated 1/12/2021 Page 1 4 of 5 Packet Pg. 60 9.A.1.c Colfi7 r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.eolliercountyfl.eoy (239) 252-2400 Matt McLean, P.E. Division Director - IF, CPP & PM 252-8279 matthew.mciean@colliercountyfl.gov f Michele Mosca, AICP Capital Project Planning 252-2466 michele.mosca@colliercountyfl. ov ❑ Richard Orth Stormwater Planning 252-5092 richard.orth@colliercountyfl. ov ric Ortman Zoning Principal Planner 252-1032 Eric.Ortman@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Derek Perry Assistant County Attorney 252-8066 Derek.perry@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ 6randi Pollard Utility Impact fees 252-6237 brandi.pollard@colliercountyfl.gov ElTodd Riggall North Collier Fire 597-9227 triggall@northcollierfire.com ❑ Brett Rosenblum, P.E. Development Review Principal Project Manager 252-2905 brett.rosenbIum@coIIiercountyfI.gov ❑ James Saba, AICP GMP, Comp Planning Manager 252-2708 james.sabo@colliercountyfl.gov Michael Sawyer Transportation Planning 252-2926 michael.sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov Corby Schmidt, AICP Comprehensive Planning 252-2944 corby.schmidt@colliereountyfl.gov Linda Simmons North Collier Fire 252-2311 Linda.Simmons@colliercountyfl.gov Peter Shawinsky Architectural Review 252-8523 peter.shawinsky@colliercountyfl.gov r� V Mark Templeton Landscape Review 252-2475 mark.templeton@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Connie Thornas Client Services Supervisor 252-6369 Consuela.thomas@colliercountyfi.gov ❑ Jessica Velasco Client Services 252-2584 jessica.velasco@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jon Walsh, P.E. Building Review 252-2962 jonathan.walsh@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Kirsten Wilkie Environmental Review Manager 252-5518 kirsten.wilkie@coiliercountyfl.gov ❑ Christine Willoughby [Daniel Zunzunegui Development Review - Zoning North Collier Fire 252-5748 1 252 2310 christine.willoughby@colliercountyfl.gov Daniel.Zunzunegui@cpliiercvuntyfl.gov 9 5F:7... 5-4L' M"' . h---'UL-- 2 7,� —i�,(? L 7 C 5.A,,AAtC,. 4`?Cc"e4-�C'1.a sxy FL— GUc"I Additional Attendee Contact Information: Name Representing Phone Email Y A-7�rA-e12 Updated 1/12/2021 Page 1 5 of 5 Packet Pg. 61 L,V .e 12 �� S ] -2 Z 1 . 3 sa 9.A.1.c /7 �x,�/17-c-- - �� z zz - 3-2, Find a participant 0 m thorndarke (Host. me) L oas 0 a� 10 Chris Scott — N1N9utp c 0 L CarbySchmidt AICP. Principal Planner 76 d Z 0 Coleman Youanovich 6e Koester A.A. o c o NormanTrebilcatk c J Andrew 5aluan 04 N N 8ta}'m2n M O N N Cormac uiblin O a ■ Craig Brown M N Daniel Zunzunegui c 0 Derek Perry .y > a� © EricDrtmanlie 3 u Heidi Cick 0 mo v a U O}Woodward N Mark Y. c R .2 Q a Q v RachelHansen m 1 sawyermichael E R Sean Sarnmon % Q Packet Pg. 62 I 9.A.1.c Applicant/Agent may also st+oa s;;e plans or conceptual plans for review in advance if desired. PL20220003226— Livin stop Rd Vet's Mem.Blvd (PUDZ) Planner- Sean Sammon PL20220003225— Livingston Rd Vet's Mem.Blvd Comm.infill Subdist(GMPA) -Rachel Hansen Assigned ❑ps Staff: Thomas Clarke STAFF FORM FOR SUPPLEMENTAL PRE -APPLICATION MEETING INFORMATION • Name and Number of who submitted pre-app request Kim Davidson, Peninsula Engineering. 239-403-6700 • Agent to list for PL# Christopher Scott, AICP, Peninsula Engineering • Owner of property (all owners for all parcels) Livingston Veterans Commercial, LLC (Parcels 150080006 and 149720005) a Confirm Purpose of Pre-App: (Rezone, etc.) Small Scale GMPA and PUDZ ■ Please list the density request of the project if applicable and number of homes/units/offices/docks (any that apply): 50,000 sf of commercial and/or 100,000 sf of indoor self -storage. ■ Details about Project: Small Scale GMPA to expand the existing Livingston Road/Veteran's Memorial Boulevard Commercial Will Subdistrict to include the adjacent 2,39-acre parcel and revise subdistrict text to expand uses and standards. Companion PUDZ application to rezone from C-1 and A to CPU for the 4.55-acres. REQUIRED Supplemental Information provided by: Name: Kim Davidson Title: Project Permit Coordinator Email: kdavidson@pen-eng.com Phone: 239-403-6700 Cancellation/Reschedule Requests: Contact Danny Condomina-Client Services Supervisor danny.condomina@colliercountyfl Phone: 239-252-6866 Created April 5, 2017 Location: K:\CDES Planning Smices\Cu rrent\Zon ing Staff Information Packet Pg. 63 Coffier County 9.A.1.c COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239125Z-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM 7-7] This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the M c Cf LCf ILdgC L]1 S,U L.II I11LCf e5 L. Name and Address I %of Ownership I If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the ercentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address I % of Ownership 1 If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest: Created 9/28/2017 Name and Address I %of Ownership i Page 1 of 3 Packet Pg. 64 C0111e7 County 9.A.1.c COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.collieritoy.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 d. If the oronerty is in the names of a r;FAIPPAI nr I INAITCn ❑AOTniEDCUM 1:,++L-- --.... - r+L - ;eneral and/or limited partners: Name and Address % of Ownership e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the c - S, ]LULKf 1umers, DeneTlcla rles, or partners: Name and Address % of OwnershiD Date of Contract: f. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or Of` i t%-Cl �, i CJ tUl PUI dL!Url, parinersnlp, or trust: 17 Name and Address g. Date subject property acquired ❑ Leased: Term of lease years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Created 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 3 Packet Pg. 65 1 CO er C MXt 9.A.1.c COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net Date of option: Date option terminates: Anticipated closing date: 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Lei AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form. Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest -holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition's final public hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department ATTM Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Agent/Owner Signature Agent/Owner Name (please print) Created 9/28/2017 Date Page 3 of 3 Packet Pg. 66 Cofer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercount . ov Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: ❑ PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. I of the Administrative Code ❑ Amendment to PUD- Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLE5, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with an up-to-date application. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. A Model PUD Document is available online at http://www.colliercountVfl.govlHome/ShowDocurnent?ld=76983. 9.A.1.c REQUIREMENTS # OF COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Cover Letter with Narrative 5tatement including a detailed description of why amendment is necessary 1 ❑ Completed Application with required attachments (download latest version) Pre -application meeting notes 1 ❑ Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 1 Property Ownership Disclosure Form 1 Notarized and completed Covenant of Unified Control 1 Completed Addressing Checklist 1 Warranty Deed(s) 1 ❑ List Identifying Owner and all parties of corporation .grt-' ® ❑ Signed and sealed Boundary Survey 1 ❑ Architectural Rendering of proposed structures 1 ❑ Current Aerial Photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. 1 [C ❑ Statement of Utility Provisions 1 ❑ Environmental Data Requirements pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 1 © ❑ Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental impact Statement (EIS) packet at time of public Hearings. Coordinate with project planner at time of public hearings. ❑ 0 ❑ Listed or Protected Species survey, less than 1.2 months old. Include copies of previous surveys. x ® ❑ Traffic Impact Study 1 ❑ [` Historical Survey 1 ❑ 0 School Impact Analysis Application, if applicable ] ❑ 0 Electronic copy of all required documents 1 0 ❑ Completed Exhibits A-F (see below for additional information)* ❑ © ❑ List of requested deviations from the LDC with justification for each (this document is separate from Exhibit E) ❑ ❑ Checklist continues on next page March 4, 2020 Page 9 of 11 Packet Pg. 67 Coder County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAR: (239) 252-6358 9.A.1.c Revised Conceptual Master Site Plan 24" x 36"and One 8 A" x 11" copy � ❑ Original PUD document ordinance, and Master Plan 24" x 36" — Only if Amending the PUD ❑ Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru & underlined 1 Copy of Official Interpretation and/or Zoning Verification 1 *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement 'The following exhibits are to be completed on a separate document and attached to the application packet: 9/ Exhibit A: List of Permitted Uses Exhibit B: Development Standards Exhibit C: Master Plan- See Chapter 3 E. I. of the Administrative Code i''" Exhibit D: Legal Description .V' Exhibit E: List of Requested LDC Deviations and justification for each Exhibit F: List of Development Commitments If located in RFMU Rural Fringe Mixed Use Receiving Land Areas Pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08.A.2.a.2.(b.)i.c., the applicant roust contact the Florida Forest Service at 239- 690-3500 for information regarding "Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan." PLANNERS — INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: ❑ School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart ❑ Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Johnson Utilities Engineering: Erie -Fey ��,c vir z��. �f} zy ❑ Parks and Recreation: Barry Williams (Director) ❑ Emergency Management: Dan Summers Immokalee Water/Sewer District: ❑ City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director Other: 111& ()2T17 ❑ I City of Naples Utilities Other: Fj - G r,e.,- Al.sit_ - I ASSOCIATED FETES FOR APPLICATION I Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 PUD Rezone: $10,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre PUD to PUD Rezone: $8,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre PUD Amendment: $6,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $2,250.00 Environmental Data Requirements -EIS Packet (submittal determined at pre -application meeting): $2,500.00 Listed or Protected Species Review (when an EIS is not required): $1,000.00 Transportation Review Fees: o Methodology Review: $500.00 *Additional fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting. o Minor Study Review: $750.00 o Major Study Review $1,500.00 March 4, 2020 Page 10 of 11 Packet Pg. 68 Coder County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.go►► Legal Advertising fees: d�CPC: $1,125-00 r� BCC: $500.00 9.A.1.c 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 School Concurrency Fee, if applicable: o Mitigation Fees, if application, to be determined by the School District in coordination with the County Fire Code Plans Review Fees are not listed, but are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. Ali checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. *Additional fee for the P and subsequent re -submittal will be accessed at 20% of the original fee. Signature of Petitioner or Agent Printed named of signing party Date March 4.2020 Page 11 of 11 Packet Pg. 69 9.A.1.c APPLICATION NUMBER: PL20220003225 DATE RECEIVED: PRE -APPLICATION CONFERENCE DATE: June 15, 2022 This application, with all required supplemental data and information, must be completed and accompanied by the appropriate fee, and returned to the Growth Management Department 239-252- 2400, Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104. The application is to be reviewed by staff for sufficiency within 30 calendar days following the filing deadline. The applicant will be notified, in writing, of the sufficiency determination. If insufficient, the applicant will have 30 days to remedy the deficiencies. For additional information on the processing of the application, see Resolution 12-234. If you have any questions, please contact the Comprehensive Planning Section at 239-252-2400. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS I. GENERAL INFOMRATION A. Name of Applicant: Andrew J. Saluan, Manager Company: Livingston Veterans Commercial, LLC Address: 5020 Tamiami Trail N, #1 12 City: Naples State: Phone Number: 239-262-2600 Fax Number: Email Address: B.1 Name of Agent* Richard D. Yovanovich, Esa. Zip Code: _34103 • THIS WILL BE THE PERSON CONTACTED FOR ALL BUSINESS RELATED TO THE PETITION. Company: Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester Address: 4001 Tamiami Trail N, Suite 300 City: Naples State: FL Zip Code: _34103 Phone Number: 239-435-3535 Fax Number: Email Address: rvovanovich@cvklawfirm.com B.2 Name of Agent* Christopher Scott • THIS WILL BE THE PERSON CONTACTED FOR ALL BUSINESS RELATED TO THE PETITION. Company: Peninsula Engineering, Inc. Address: 2600 Golden Gate Parkway City: Naples State: Phone Number: 239-403-6727 Fax Number: Email Address: CScott@pen-eng.com Zip Code: _34105 C. Name of Owner (s) of Record: Livingston Veterans Commercial, LLC Address: 5020 Tamiami Trail N, #1 12 City: Naples State: FL Zip Code: _34103 Phone Number: 239-262-2600 Fax Number: 1 Packet Pg. 70 9.A.1.c Email Address: D. Name, Company, Address and Qualifications of all consultants and other professionals providing information contained in this application, as well as Qualifications of the Agent identified above. See Exhibit I-D II. Disclosure of Interest Information: A. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, Tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest. (Use additional sheets if necessary). Name and Address Percentage of Ownership B. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each. Name and Address Percentage of Stock C. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest. Name and Address Percentage of Interest Packet Pg. 71 9.A.1.c D. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners. Name and Address See Exhibit II Percentage of Ownership E. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners. Name and Address Date of Contract: Percentage of Ownership F. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust. Name and Address G. Date subject property acquired ( ) leased ( ): Term of lease: yrs./mos. If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate date of option: option terminates: , or anticipated closing: and date NOTE: H. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Packet Pg. 72 9.A.1.c III. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: A. PARCEL I.D. NUMBER: 150080006 and 149720005 B. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Exhibit 111.13 C. GENERAL LOCATION: Southeast intersection of Livinaston Rd and Veterans Memorial Blvd D. Section: 13 Township: 48 South Range: 25 East E. PLANNING COMMUNITY: Rural Estates F. TAZ: 2691 G. SIZE IN ACRES: 4.68 H. ZONING: C-1 and A I. FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION(S): Urban Mixed Use District - Urban Residential Subdistrict and Commercial District - Commercial Mixed Use Subdistrict - Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Blvd Commercial Infill Subdistrict J. SURROUNDING LAND USE PATTERN: _Vacant, Single-family and Multifamily Residential, Golf. Civic/Institutional (schools and fire) IV. TYPE OF REQUEST: A. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN ELEMENT (S) TO BE AMENDED: Housing Element Traffic Circulation Sub -Element Aviation Sub -Element Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element Solid Waste Sub -Element Capital Improvement Element X Future Land Use Element Immokalee Master Plan Recreation/Open Space Mass Transit Sub -Element Potable Water Sub -Element NGWAR Sub -Element Drainage Sub -Element CCME Element Golden Gate Master Plan B. AMEND PAGE (S): _26 OF THE: _Future Land Use ELEMENT AS FOLLOWS: (Use Strike-+Tto identify language to be deleted; Use Underline to identify language to be added). Attach additional pages if necessary: See Exhibit IV.B 4 Packet Pg. 73 9.A.1.c C. AMEND FUTURE LAND USE MAP(S) DESIGNATION FROM _Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict TO Commercial District, Commercial Mixed Use Subdistrict, Livingston Road / Veterans Memorial Blvd Commercial Infill Subdistrict D. AMEND OTHER MAP(S) AND EXHIBITS AS FOLLOWS: (Name & Page #) E. DESCRIBE ADDITIONAL CHANGES REQUESTED: V. REQUIRED INFORMATION: NOTE: ALL AERIALS MUST BE AT A SCALE OF NO SMALLER THAN I"=400'. At least one copy reduced to 8- 1/2 x 11 shall be provided of all aerials and/or maps. A. LAND USE Exhibit V.A.I I. Provide general location map showing surrounding developments (PUD, DRI's, existing zoning) with subject property outlined. Exhibit V.A.2. Provide most recent aerial of site showing subject boundaries, source, and date. Exhibit V.A.3. Provide a map and summary table of existing land use and zoning within a radius of 300 feet from boundaries of subject property. B. FUTURE LAND USE AND DESIGNATION Exhibit V.B. Provide map of existing Future Land Use Designation(s) of subject property and adjacent lands, with acreage totals for each land use designation on the subject property. C. ENVIRONMENTAL Exhibit V.C. Provide most recent aerial and summary table of acreage of native habitats and soils occurring on site. HABITAT IDENTIFICATION MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH THE FDOT-FLORIDA LAND USE, COVER AND FORMS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (FLUCCS CODE). NOTE: THIS MAY BE INDICATED ON SAME AERIAL AS THE LAND USE AERIAL IN "A" ABOVE. Exhibit V.C. Provide a summary table of Federal (US Fish & Wildlife Service) and State (Florida Game & Freshwater Fish Commission) listed plant and animal species known to occur on the site and/or known to inhabit biological communities similar to the site (e.g. panther or black bear range, avian rookery, bird migratory route, etc.) Identify historic and/or archaeological sites on the subject property. Packet Pg. 74 9.A.1.c D. GROWTH MANAGEMENT Reference , F.A.C. and Collier County's Capital Improvements Element Policy 1.1.2 (Copies attached). 1 . INSERT "Y" FOR YES OR "N" FOR NO IN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING: N Is the proposed amendment located in an Area of Critical State Concern? (Reference F.A.C.). IF so, identify area located in ACSC. N Is the proposed amendment directly related to a proposed Development of Regional Impact pursuant to Chapter 380 F.S.? (Reference , F.A.C.) N Is the proposed amendment directly related to a proposed Small Scale Development Activity pursuant to Subsection 163.3187 (1) (c), F.S.? Does the proposed amendment create a significant impact in population which is defined as a potential increase in County -wide population by more than 5% of population projections? (Reference Capital Improvement Element Policy 1.1.2). If yes, indicate mitigation measures being proposed in conjunction with the proposed amendment. Y Does the proposed land use cause an increase in density and/or intensity See Exh V.D.1 to the uses permitted in a specific land use designation and district identified (commercial, industrial, etc.) or is the proposed land use a new land use designation or district? (Reference F.A.C.). If so, provide data and analysis to support the suitability of land for the proposed use, and of environmentally sensitive land, ground water and natural resources. (Reference , F.A.C.) E. PUBLIC FACILITIES l . Provide the existing Level of Service Standard (LOS) and document the impact the proposed change will have on the following public facilities: Exhibit V.E Potable Water Exhibit V.E Sanitary Sewer Exhibit V.E Arterial & Collector Roads; Name specific road and LOS Livingston Road _Veterans Memorial Boulevard See Exhibit V.D.2 TIS Exhibit V.E Drainage Exhibit V.E Solid Waste Exhibit V.E Parks: Community and Regional If the proposed amendment involves an increase in residential density, or an increase in intensity for commercial and/or industrial development that would cause the LOS for public facilities to fall below the adopted LOS, indicate mitigation measures being proposed in conjunction with the proposed amendment. (Reference Capital Improvement Element Objective 1 and Policies) 2. Exhibit V.E Provide a map showing the location of existing services and public facilities that will serve the subject property (i.e. water, sewer, fire protection, police protection, schools and emergency medical services. Packet Pg. 75 9.A.1.c 3. Exhibit V.E Document proposed services and public facilities, identify provider, and describe the effect the proposed change will have on schools, fire protection and emergency medical services. F. OTHER Identify the following areas relating to the subject property: Exhibit V.F.1 Flood zone based on Flood Insurance Rate Map data (FIRM). Exhibit V.F.2 Location of wellfields and cones of influence, if applicable. (Identified on Collier County Zoning Maps) N/A Coastal High Hazard Area, if applicable N/A High Noise Contours (65 LDN or higher) surrounding the Naples Airport, if applicable (identified on Collier County Zoning Maps). G. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION $16,700.00 non-refundable filing fee made payable to the Board of County Commissioners due at time of submittal. (Plus, proportionate share of advertising costs) X $9,000.00 non-refundable filing fee for a Small -Scale Amendment made payable to the Board of County Commissioners due at time of submittal. (Plus, proportionate share of advertising costs) X Proof of ownership (copy of deed) X Notarized Letter of Authorization if Agent is not the Owner (See attached form) * If you have held a pre -application meeting within 9 months prior to submitted date and paid the pre -application fee of $500.00 at the meeting, deduct that amount from the above application fee amount when submitting your application. All pre -application fees are included in the total application submittal fee if petition submitted within 9 months of pre -application meeting date. Otherwise the overage will be applied to future proportionate share advertising costs. * Maps shall include: North arrow, name and location of principal roadways and shall be at a scale of 1 "=400' or at a scale as determined during the pre -application meeting. *All attachments should be consistently referenced as attachments or exhibits, and should be labelled to correlate to the application form, e.g. "Exhibit I.D." * Planning Community, TAZ map, Traffic Analysis Zone map, Zoning maps, and Future Land Use Maps. Some maps are available on the Zoning Division website depicting information herein: Zoning Services Section: Comprehensive Planning Section: Packet Pg. 76 9.A.1.c THIS HAS CHANGED SINCE DCA BECAME DEO. SEE GMP PAEG 2011 UPDATES: https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/your-government/divisions-s-z/zoning-division/zoning-services- section/land-use-commission-district-maps Packet Pg. 77 INSTR 5862074 OR 5758 PG 1612 E-RECORDED 5/1/2020 4:38 PM PAGES 2 CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT AND COMPTROLLER, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA DOC@.70 $8,925.00 REC $18.50 CONS $1,275,000.00 9.A.1.c This Document Prepared Without Opion of Title JAMES H. SIESKY, ESQUIRE Siesky & Pilon 2800 Davis Blvd., Suite 205 Naples, FL 34104 Consideration: $1,275,000.00 Parcel>DNumber: 0014417 0,0005 Warranty This Indenture, Made this,4s'E day of May 2020 A.D. , Between Livingston/Veterans, LLC,,a Florida limited liability company a of the County of Collier , Livingston Veterans Commercial, LLC, company whose address is: 4980 Tamiami Trail `N. 1".4201, of the County of Collier Witnesseth that the GRANTOR, for and in consideration, of e'gum Of {( ------------------------TEN DO L3 and other good and valuable consideration to GRANTOR yi hand,, granted, bargained and sold to the said GRANTEE and GRANT I lying and being in the County of Collier The Northwest 1/4 of the Northw Northeast 1/4 of Section 13, T Collier County, Florida, less and e Collier County, a political subdivi Records Book 2597, Page 1684, County, Florida. State of Florida , grantor, and a Florida limited liability Naples, FL 34103 State of Florida , grantee. $10)- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — DOLLARS, Said by GRANTEE, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has letters, successors and assigns forever, the following described land, situate, State of Florida to wit: eft "-l-/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of the own ip 48 South, Range 25 East, x ' pit .' the parcel of land deeded to sion,.,',by,deed recorded in Official of "theme ublic Records of Collier Together with all tenements, hereditaments and, ppurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. To Have and to Hold, the same in fee simple for veil AND, the grantor hereby covenants with said grantee `that the grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that tie grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and conveys4;id land, and hereby fully warrants the title to said land and wil defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever; and that said land is free of all encumbrances, except taxes accruing subsequent to December 31, 2019 and subject to (a) ad valorem and non-advalorem real property taxes for the year of closing and subsequent years; (b) zoning, building code and other use restrictions imposed by governmental authority; and (c) outstanding oil, gas and mineral interest of records, if any. Subject property is vacant, unimproved property and has never assumed the character of homestead. and the grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said land, and will defend the same against lawful claims of all persons who packet Pg. 78 Laser Generated 6y 0 Display Systems, Inc., 2020 (863) 763-5555 Form FLWD-2 *** OR 5758 PG 1613 *** 9.A.1.c Warranty Deed- Page 2 Parcel ID Number: 001497200005 In Witness Whereof, Signed, sealed and deli Printed Name:`Z Witness Printed N Witness antor has hereunto set its hand and seal the day and year first above written. 1 our presence: Livingston/Veterans , LLC, a Florida limited liability company s P � — By : (Seal) Marilyn Bernier, Manager ~ P.O. Address: 477 Devil's Lane, Naples, FL 34103 STATE OF Florida COUNTY OF Collier' y The foregoing inst ent was acknowledged before me 1 notarization, this day of April Marilyn Be nier, Manager of Li liability company L ho is personally known to me err who has produced her as identification. physical presence or online by , LLC, a Florida limited -Pr�nted Name Notary sPubl ' ,. My Cbrulnission.EVires: RICK��`�1CK :H fAE4�lon# G� 123386. •• CQmm 29 � x'- >rx4��9 duly F�u� ntus►t� 1ot9 o?� Bondedl��itoY � - . 7509@05 Laser Generated by 0 Display Systems, Inc., 2020 (863)763-5555 FonnFLwD-2 I Packet Pg. 79 INSTR 5967074 OR 5857 PG 2468 E-RECORDED 12/9/2020 4:25 PM PAGES 4 CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT AND COMPTROLLER, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA Doc@.70 $6,111.00 REC $35.50 INDX $2.00 CONS $873,000.00 9.A.1.c ITIIS INSTRUMENT PREPARED BY AND RETURN TO: Santiago Eljaiek III, ) scl. Marin, Eljaiek & Lopez, P.L. 2601 South Bayshore Drive, 18"' Floor Coconut Grove, Florida.33133 Our File No • 0054-008 Property Appraisers r [. entification (Folio) NUn1ber: 00150080006 whoa auo,r �„� ,.,�„• ,,,, ,«•<�,,,��,; �,��, THIS WARRANTY DEED, nth eJ day of pc'c yv%tpeA— . 2020 by Leonard Stemmcrman, Scan Stemmerman, and Debra Hu a/lda Debbie llussie, Individually and as Successor Ca -Trustees of'tile Marc L. Catalano Revocable Intel rvo -Tr7t t dated November 23, 2004, as amended and restated on October 26, 2010, whose post office address Is 634t�Auth I.,N, Davie- FL 3333I . herein called the Grantor, to Livingston Veterans Commercial LLC, a Florida Iin� efi�J;tility company, �� hose post off ice address is 4980 Tamianli "17 N., #201, Naples, FL 34103, hereinafter cal[ed ter ar ntee: (Wherever used herein the leans "Gratilo) ,incline all the pal -lies ICJ lhis instrument and the heirs, legal representatives Cll?Gi assigns !7f 11142'!1'1L'1�IlClrS tl!'i exe .4pcv s. ors cint1 assigns Of corp()rat on % W I T N E S S E T H: That the Grantor, for and in ct and other valuable considerations, receipt whereof is realises, releases, conveys and confirms unto the Gra Florida. to -wit.: The Southwest 1/4 (SW 1/4) of the Northwest 1/4 (NN' Northeast 1/4 (NE 1/4) of Section 13, Township 48 South, LESS therefrom the land conveyed to Collier County by 1692, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Of the Sinn of F N AND 00/100'S ($10.00) Dollars Qnowledpcd, hereby grants, bargains, sells, aliens, I ertain land situate in COLLIER County, State of the Northwest 114 (NIVV 1/4) of the East, Collier County, Florida; eed recorded in Boole 2597, Page Subject to easements, restrictions and reservations of record and ta-�g§-Cgr` i"ear. 2021 and thereafter. TOGETHER, with all the tenements, hereditanlents and appurtenances thereto 156Jpndr,in anywise appertaining. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the same in fee simple forever. The undersigned hereby represent and warrant that the herein -described Property is scant land and not their homestead, nor the homestead of anyone for whose support they are responsible, nor adjacent to or contiguous with any such homestead. AND, the Grantor hereby covenants with said Grantee that the Grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the Grantor has good right and lawful autllor•ity to sell and convey said land, and hereby warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever; and that said land is free of all encumbrances, except taxes accruing subsequent to December 31. 2020. File No: 0054-008 Packet Pg. 80 OR 5857 PG 2469 9.A.1.c IN, WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Gramm has signed and sealed these presents the day and year tn-st above WTttten. Signed. scaled and delttA d in the presence of- i -_ Marc L. Catalano Revocable Inter Vivos Trust Witness ##1 .Signature dated 11/23/2004 as amended and restated on October 26, 2t010 Witness # I Printed Named _ s Leonard Steminerman, Individually and as Successor Co - Witness n2 i�nature "rttstee orthe .Marc L. Catalano Revocable Inter Vivos ;:.wt dated 11/2312004 as amended and restated on October -6, 2010 Witness i#2 Printed Nanie � ; '•,, p STATE OIL (2-- COUNTY OF The Foregoing instrument was ackno% ledged before the by means 6 this + _ day of f tom, 2020 by Leonard Stemal an ti orthe N-fiarc L. Catalano Revocable Inter Vivos'1'rust dated November 2%'�{i' 2Ct,f'?010. who is personally known to me M- IMS llrodttc'ed"A- t (lid not take t}q#Iltslrrrr -~- -� , rrRANC; or i�CD � Notate Public___ -lift N:N !Timed N's muv Name \'Iy coil) III 'i' '/err 6l N I ti Gvr�'♦ Fttg No. OOS4-008 I presence or © online nataTization, dually and as Successor C o-'h'ustee as amended and restated on October as identification and ❑ did Packet Pg. 81 OR 5857 PG 2470 9.A.1.c IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Grantor has signed and sealed these presents the day and year first above written. Signed. sealed and delivered in the presence of: Witness,41 Sigtature Witness 41 Printed Name Wit,nneese#2 Signature Witness 92 Printed Name Marc L. Catalano Revocable Inter Vivos Trust bated 1.1/23/2004 as amended and restated on October 26, 2010 Sean Stenimerman. Individually and as Successor Co - Trustee of the Marc L. Catalano Revocable Intel- Vivos 'Trust dated l 1/23/2004 as amended and restated on '{Qctober 26, 2010 STATE OF COUNTY OF The foreeoinz instrume was ac nowledged before me by mellen this ,re::) day of P8!.2020, by Seam Stemmerthe MarcL. Catalano Revocableer Vivos Trust dated N vem 26, 201 v- is personally known to me or has produced 1th. /oq /x 0�-) otary Narhe cal presence or ❑ online notarization, lually and as Successor Co -Trustee of as anacnded and restated on October as identification and ❑ did File No: 0054-008 Packet Pg. 82 *** OR 5857 PG 2471 *** 9.A.1.c IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Grantor has signed and sealed these presents the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: ature Witness 41 0 Witness 42 Signature r rrtiUt'� Witness #2 Printed Name STATE OFt' COUNTY OF Marc L. Catalano Revocable Inter Vivos Trust dated 11/23/2004 as amended and restated on October 26, 2_01 Debra I-1 ey a/k/a Debbie 1-Iussie, Individually and as Successor Co -Trustee of the Nlare L. Catalano Revocable Inter Vivos Trust dated l 1/23/2004 as amended and restated on October 26, 2010 The foregoing instrument %vas acknowledged before me by n�eai?S this Q'�r day of t `2020, by Debra Hussey alb Co -Trustee of the Marc L. Catalano Revocable Inter Vivos Trust dat on October 26, 2010, who is personally known to me or has produce and © did ® did not take an oath. LUISA Notary Pub A. CARRION 5E 1®�@� Notary Publ;c. Stale of Florida r Commission# GG 355564 cal presence or ❑ online notarization, l-IUSSiC, Individually and as Successor ber 23. 2004, as amended and restated `-i--[� - as identification My comm. expires July 16, 2023 Notary Public L�� Pit - Printed Notary Name My commission expires: file No: 0064-008 Packet Pg. 83 9.A.1.c AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PL20220003225 and PL20220003226 1 Andrew.1 Saluan (print name), as Aulhorized Agenllh+fanager (title, If applicable) of . ivingslan veterans Commercial, LLC _ (company, If a licable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner=applicantr7contract purchaser=and that: 1. 1 have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application, and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5- Well authorize Goernari. Yovanovich Koeslor, PA and peninsula Erig iwerring, Inc to act as ourlmy representative In any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. 'Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp- pres- or V. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member. " ■ ff the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner Can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner' of the named partnership. • if the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee"- ■ In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership - Under penalties of pal ury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts stated in it are true. r /f //y'/-L-- Dat STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing in trument w s acknowleged before me by means of �hysical presence or ❑ online notarization this I� r ay of 20 1y !printed name of owner or qualifier) l f' ± In' 1 p r-1 Ci Such person(s) Notary Public must check applicable box: EfAre personally known to me ❑ Has produced a current drivers license ❑ Has produced as identificatian� Notary signature: . Z CM08-CDA-0011 %)15..5 REV 314r2020 a ... CAROL L. BRUNDACE Q rlM{$5ION # hH 169534 •' IRI 9: Ay v9l Z, 2U25 :;f"P` eaWea rnn, " aPu* undmw from Packet Pg. 84 9.A.1.c cothe*v County EXHIBIT 11. COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: C Name and Address I % of Ownership If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address I % of Ownership If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest: Name and Address I % of Ownership Created 9/28/2017 Page 1 of 3 Packet Pg. 85 Cothe* r County 9.A.1.c COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners: e f W* Name and Address % of Ownership Livingston Veterans Commercial, LLC 100.00 - Eijk De Mol Van Otterloo Revocable Trust* 92.5% - AJS Livingston Veterans Commercial, LLC** 7.5% *Eijk De Mol Van Otterloo is sole beneficiary; **Andrew Saluan is sole shareholder If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the 'I IIut=I J, JLUL.RI IUIUIn J, UCI ICI IL.IQI ICJ, UI PCII LI ICI J. Name and Address % of Ownership Date of Contract: If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust: Date subject property acquired ❑ Leased: Term of lease Name and Address years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Created 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 3 Packet Pg. 86 Co[Iier County 9.A.1.c COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Date of option: Date option terminates: or Anticipated closing date: AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form. Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest -holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition's final public hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Agent/Owner Signature Christopher O. Scott (Agent) Agent/Owner Name (please print) Created 9/28/2017 12/14/2022 Date Page 3 of 3 Packet Pg. 87 12/13/22, 2:27 PM Detail by Entity Name 9.A.1.c DIVISION OF CORF IF)I vi�I III rif o � r eut nJ�c isrt :�ewM vj fluridre �vrLsiee Department of State / Division of Corporations / Search Records / Search by Entity Name / Detail by Entity Name Florida Limited Liability Company LIVINGSTON VETERANS COMMERCIAL LLC Filing Information Document Number L20000098445 FEI/EIN Number 85-0689069 Date Filed 04/08/2020 State FL Status ACTIVE Principal Address 5020 TAM IAMI TRAIL N. #112 NAPLES, FL 34103 Changed: 02/17/2021 Mailing Address 5020 TAM IAMI TRAIL N. #112 NAPLES, FL 34103 Changed: 02/17/2021 Registered Agent Name & Address SALUAN, ANDREW J 5020 TAM IAMI TRAIL N. #112 NAPLES, FL 34103 Address Changed: 02/17/2021 Authorized Persons) Detail Name & Address Title MGR SALUAN, ANDREW J 5020 TAM IAMI TRAIL N. #112 NAPLES, FL 34103 Annual Reports Report Year Filed Date 2021 02/17/2021 search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=EntityName&directionType=Initial&searchNameOrder=Ll]Packet Pg. 88 12/13/22, 2:27 PM Detail by Entity Name 2022 01 /31 /2022 Document Images 01/31/2022 --ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 02/17/2021 --ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/08/2020 -- Florida Limited Liability View image in PDF format Florida Department of State, Division of Corporations Packet Pg. 89 search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetaiI?inquirytype=EntityName&directionType=Initial&searchNameOrder=Ll 12/13/22, 2:29 PM Detail by Entity Name 9.A.1.c DIVISION OF CORF /�jI I rif o � r eut nJ�c isrt :�ewM vj fluridre �vrLsiee Department of State / Division of Corporations / Search Records / Search by Entity Name / Detail by Entity Name Florida Limited Liability Company AJS LIVINGSTON VETERANS COMMERCIAL LLC Filing Information Document Number L20000321973 FEI/EIN Number 85-0689069 Date Filed 10/19/2020 State FL Status ACTIVE Principal Address 5020 TAMIAMI TRAIL N #112 NAPLES, FL 34103 Changed: 02/17/2021 Mailing Address 5020 TAMIAMI TRAIL N #112 NAPLES, FL 34103 Changed: 02/17/2021 Registered Agent Name & Address SALUAN, ANDREW J 5020 TAMIAMI TRAIL N #112 NAPLES, FL 34103 Address Changed: 02/17/2021 Authorized Persons) Detail Name & Address Title MGR SALUAN, ANDREW J 5020 TAMIAMI TRAIL N #112 NAPLES, FL 34103 Annual Reports Report Year Filed Date 2021 02/17/2021 search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=EntityName&directionType=Initial&searchNameOrder=AJIPacket Pg. 90 1 12/13/22, 2:29 PM Detail by Entity Name 2022 01 /31 /2022 Document Images 01/31/2022 --ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 02/17/2021 --ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 10/19/2020 -- Florida Limited Liability View image in PDF format Florida Department of State, Division of Corporations search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetaiI?inquirytype=EntityName&directionType=Initial&searchNameOrder=AJ Packet Pg. 91 J m J w Q ` O LLJ 3 v, Z Q � a LLJ W =k g4 Y F 3 yey $� ono sumE. LINE KWI/4, N.w.t/4, N.W.1/4. N.E.1/4, SEC.13-48-25 d" +� S 00'08'49° E ,a 336.61' (R) 93 5 00'O6'38" E°• 336.48' (M) 3 $ eS A Ym } a r,RR ye N 00.09'24yW 200.02' (R) v LE55\ NL, EXCEPToc„ b O.R. 2897, PG. D009'24' W 106.70' E. LINE .w.1/4, 41/4, NXI/4. N.E.1/4, SEC.13-48-25 9 S omiS'49" E 336.61' (C)of, ,90 S 00'07'89" E 336.84' (M) oa,. ° a oe a°ea,s s ° 3 w'ss'N' w mTm' (R)" R) e4S OC3]'IY W 33R.42' ' (y) x LINE BEARING M oa Z ps+' 03 GRAPHIC SCALE Nam, 3 3 - m z 0 0 ,S 9 3.56' (M) ..Aa8 0009'24' E 873.sW (C) BY 8 _ LIVINGSTON RD NOTE: THIS PROPERI IS SUBLECT TO PR°PERT'r AREA. 46ACRES, NDREDR�SRE9ER ATIDNB OR RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. (C) CALCULATED 0 (PUBLIC R-O-W, WIDTH VARIES) OUARIER"Of"NORTHWETS°"T "AFTER .1 NoRTM111EEPn OU�TEREOFA"sEcl°oN 13. (R) TOWNS p� 48 SOUTH. RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER C UNtt. ROR OA AS B ING N 890]OS E P O 005/e' IRON PIN MFND • NAIL/PIS ABSTRACT OF TITLE HAS NOT BEEN REVIEWED BY SURVEYOR. . MSIP 11 5/6^ PIN/CAP 'La1772" PROP— 06LMP110r1: ELEVATIOns REFER TO THE 1— AMERICAN VERTICAL DANM OF 1988. © _ COMMUNICATIO11 M RKER/FLAGGING TIE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF TIE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF TIE NORTHWEST THIS PROPERry w SURVEYED UNDER MY DIRECTION Ory 11/14/2O2 2 COMMUNICAnoHE PULL-BOx GUI AH— RARTC MAST-aRM BASE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECT10N 13, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RA Ens/T LUER CODUONtt, FLORIDA. LESS AND —EPT TIE R PARCEL OF arv0 Dc IFFIE9R co-, DS BOOK 2597, E HE SIGNANRE AND ORIGINAL LICENSED SURVEYOR PND MAPPER. SEAL OE A FLORIDA ELECTRIC M p -Box ® 1684, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNtt. FLORpA. iOCETHER WITH PENINSuu ENGINEERING „ n� uuuo "j�� „"'o�N...._H If e NG PGLE oNCRERT Ess P T 1/4 OF THE NDRTHWEST 1/4 IF THE NDRTHWEST 1/4 OF THE S11f S13, Tav GE E CoUER NOUNTu "`n''' ' - DrvcRET o E WITH NCHT AND D Y o FLORIDA,FLoLESSi1II Ex EFT THE PIDC EN F N DE THE PARCEL OF ND q.' CERTIFICATE DF ADTnoRDA-H NDNBER LB 1n2 n`O 6zzB ; fY wao0 POLE o supomslR, av DECD RECDRoso Iry oFT Ica 692, OF THE UBUC ECORDS OF COLDER COUNtt, FLORIp.A,OR 5 BOOK 2597, PAGE I I TRAFFIC SHRVIOE ' SERVICE PEDE L Gu+KER/F—IINGsa m s ii STATE OF T , •:•FLORID....e „"'s'E'o - AS NAw M au WATER VALVE '�S rve °� . EDP EDGE of PA11111' a DOC EA. OF CURD EXHIBIT IILB 62]B •••non••• NOT TI CHIEF: jw DR A DATE: a zozz DATE 1 �1 28 2022 ■■ sso Enwre way � Naples, FL. 34110 LIVINGSTON & VETERAN'S tNNG NO DRAH-2163 IT No PRoz022731 R THE SIGNATURE AND UREWITAND SIGNAVALIDTURE THE ORIGINAL BEN � - KAS k ® SEAL OF A FLORIDA SHEET OF SHEET Phone: (239) 2842000 k Q LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. 1 1 3-48-z5 Florida Certificate of HOILEIMONOESR Authorization No. BOUNDARY SURVEY p„31Be°a.4.9 REW9IDNB Legend Livingston Rd -Veteran's Memorial Bvld Commercial Infill Subdistrict: 4.6 acres i' Ic - - .--.__ r•- � . y- A O RIF - Veterans Memorial Blvd 'ta`. *'Veterans Memorial Blvd Y.Y �.�..��It •_ liiti►,'4�� .._... F � I�aa il?IIT. a4l.i � O 0.5 Mi:. Veterans Memorial'Bl cl N ea , +� Project Location ® 1�.�,. !�" '\ • , J ♦ •" a �- - �lo to 'IL Immokalee.Rd�-a F SOURCES: COLLIERCOUNTYGEOGRAPHICINFORMATION SYSTEMSo(2022)/..a, 400 800 Fee PEN I N 5 U LA # PROJECT: LIVINGSTON ROAD -VETERAN'S MEMORIAL COMMERCIAL INFILL SUBDISTRICT BOULEVARD CLIENT: LIVINGSTON VETERANS COMMERCIAL, LLC EXHIBIT DESC: EXHIBITV.A.1-LOCATION MAP -AERIAL OVERLAY NOTES: ENGINEERING LOCATION: SE INTERSECTION OF LIVINGSTON RD 2600 GOLDENGATE PARKWAY NAPLES FL34105 AND VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD PRO I ECT: CLIENT: EXHIBIT DESC: LIVINGSTON ROAD -VETERAN'S MEMORIAL BOULEVARD LIVINGSTON VETERANS COMMERCIAL, LLC EXHIBIT V.A.2 -AERIAL PENINSULA # COMMERCIAL INFILL SUBDISTRICT ENGINEERING LOCATION: NOTES: SE INTERSECTION OF LIVINGSTON RD 2600 GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY AND VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD Legend ZONING FUTURE LAND USE LAND 9,A.1.c Livingston Rd -Veteran's Memorial Bvld Commercial nfill Subdistrict: 4.6-acres North PUD South PUD Urban Residential Subdistrict Livingston RoadNeterans Memorial Residentia 1_ Residential Subdistrict Residential 1300'Buffer MEDITERRAPUD East PUD Livingston RoadNeterans Memorial - I Residential Subdistrict Residential West Agricultural Urban Residential Subdistrict Undeveloped 1 1 BRANDON RPUD 1 C-1 1 1 1 1 1 SANDALWOOD 1 RPUD 1 AGRICULTURAL j 1 1 _ 1 % o ALLURA RPUD AGRICULTURAL RMC-ENCLAVE RPUD 500 1,000 SOURCES: COLLIER COUNTY GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS (2022) - Fee PROJECT: CLIENT: EXHIBIT DESC: LIVINGSTON ROAD -VETERAN'S MEMORIAL BOULEVARD LIVINGSTON VETERANS COMMERCIAL, LLC EXHIBIT V.A.3 -ZONING MAP P E N I N S U LA # COMMERCIAL INFILL SUBDISTRICT NOTES: ENGINEERING LOCATION: SE INTERSECTION OF LIVINGSTON RD 2600 GOLDENGATE PARKWAY NAPLES FL34105 AND VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD co, Legend 9.A.1.c [N e5`�PY r_1 Livingston Rd -Veteran's Memorial Bvld Commercial Infill Subdistrict (Proposed) Livingston Rd -Veteran's Memorial Blvd Commercial Infill Subdistrict (Existing) = Livingston Rd -Veteran's Memorial Blvd Residential Subdistrict too°� ?� _p0C�,2 l` Felicita CT Urban Residential Subdistrict Milan LN COnO Meq/terra Q. asera CT Corsica WAY euon Celebrita CT Veterans Memorial BLVD Barclay CT 3 0 c t4 FFQ m a w C_ 'O '- �� a Fairway CT o a a + 3 7E �Frophy DR a Trophy -DR B w )AVEe N O o.. P�ne<o Aberdeen eOre/%C/R Amberwood DR c 0 1,000 2,000 SOURCES: COLLIER COUNTY GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS (2022) 1 Fee 4� PROJECT: LIVINGSTON ROAD -VETERAN'S MEMORIAL BOULEVARD CLIENT: LIVINGSTON VETERANS COMMERCIAL, LLC EXHIBIT DEC: EXHIBIT V.B - Future Land Use Map PENINSULA# COMMERCIAL INFILL SUBDISTRICT NOTES: ENGINEERING LOCATION: SE INTERSECTION OF LIVINGSTON RD 2600 GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY NAPLES FL 34105 AND VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD 9.A.1.c PENINSULA ENGINEERING LIVINGSTON ROAD VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD. COMMERCIAL LISTED SPECIES SURVEY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA EXHIBIT V.C. PREPARED BY: PENINSULA ENGINEERING 2600 GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY NAPLES, FL 34105 NOVEMBER 2022 BRUCE LAYMAN, SPWS Packet Pg. 97 9.A.1.c PENINSULA ENGINEERING LIVINGSTON/VETERANS COMMERCIAL LISTED SPECIES SURVEY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................ 2. PROJECT METHODOLOGY................................................................................................................ 2.1. Listed Wildlife Survey............................................................................................................... 2.2. Listed Plant Survey................................................................................................................... 2.3. Habitat/Vegetation Survey....................................................................................................... 3. SURVEY RESULTS.............................................................................................................................. 3.1. Listed Wildlife Species Observed On-Site................................................................................ 3.2. Listed Wildlife Species Not Observed On -Site But with Low to Moderate Probability of Occurring.............................................................................................................................................. 3.3. Other Listed Wildlife Species Warranting Consideration......................................................... 3.4. Listed Plant Species Observed On-Site..................................................................................... 3.5. Habitat/Vegetation Survey....................................................................................................... 4. SUMMARY........................................................................................................................................ 4.1. Listed Plant & Wildlife Species................................................................................................. 5. REFERENCES CITED........................................................................................................................... TABLES Table 1- Listed Species and Vegetation Survey Details .................................................... Table 2 - Listed Plant and Wildlife Species Observed....................................................... Table 3 - Non -listed Wildlife Species Observed................................................................ Table 4 - Estimated Probability of Occurrence of Non -Observed Listed Faunal Species Table 5 - Estimated Probability of Occurrence of Non -Observed Listed Floral Species Table 6 - Existing Vegetative Associations and Land Uses .............................................. APPENDICES Appendix A - Existing Vegetation Association & Land Use Descriptions FIGURES Figure 1— Existing Conditions 3 3 3 4 4 5 5 5 5 6 7 7 7 8 10 10 10 11 11 11 2 P:\Active_Projects\P-LIVC-001\001_GMPA and PUD\Reports Packet Pg. 98 9.A.1.c PENINSULA ENGINEERING LIVINGSTON/VETERANS COMMERCIAL LISTED SPECIES SURVEY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA 1. INTRODUCTION Peninsula Engineering, Inc. entered into a contractual agreement with Livingston Veterans Commercial, LLC to provide environmental services associated with a 4.68-acre parcel of land (Project) known as Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard Commercial. The Project is located in Section 13, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. It is bordered on the north by Veterans Memorial Blvd. and residential development, on the east and south by residential development, and on the west by Livingston Road and undeveloped land. The Environmental Data author credentials include undergraduate and graduate degrees in the environmental sciences and full-time employment as an Environmental Consultant/Ecologist in Lee and Collier Counties since 1992. A protected species survey was conducted on the project site and is summarized herein to provide support documentation for local, state, and federal development review. 2. PROJECT METHODOLOGY Peninsula Engineering conducted a survey of the Project site using a field methodology in general accordance with Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) standards. This survey was performed to document vegetation associations and to locate and document any listed plant or wildlife species that occur on the site during the survey period. The field surveys for this project were conducted during July 2021 and October 2022 and the following information provides detailed project methodologies for the listed wildlife survey, the habitat/vegetation survey, and the listed plant species survey. 2.1. Listed Wildlife Survey Priorto the listed species survey, color aerial imagerywas reviewed to identify the habitats present on and adjacent to the site. Based on the habitat types identified, a preliminary list of state and federal listed flora and fauna that might occur on the project site was determined. The preliminary list included the Florida bonneted bat (Eumops floridanus), the gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus), and the Big Cypress fox squirrel (Sciurus niger avicennia). Additionally, various publications and databases were also reviewed to identify the listed plant and wildlife species that could occur and those that had been documented on or near the project site (e.g., Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission [FWC]). FWC's Florida's Imperiled Species Management Plan (FWC 2016) was used to determine the "listed" state and federal status designation of wildlife species. Notes on Florida's Endangered and Threatened Plants was used to determine the status of listed plants (Weaver and Anderson, 2010). Peninsula Engineering conducted a biological survey of the project site using a field methodology that was in general accordance with FWC standards. The field survey team consisted of one biologist performing parallel meandering pedestrian transects spaced approximately 75'-100' feet apart depending on type of habitat, visibility limits, and density of vegetation. The approximate location of parallel pedestrian transects performed during the listed species and habitat survey are indicated on Figure 1 titled Existing Conditions. Pedestrian transects were conducted in the morning hours of July 16, 2021 totaling 4.0 hours of field time. Table 1 lists survey date, time, weather conditions, biologist conducting survey, and 3 P:\Active_Projects\P-LIVC-001\001_GMPA and PUD\Reports Packet Pg. 99 9.A.1.c PENINSULA ENGINEERING LIVINGSTON/VETERANS COMMERCIAL LISTED SPECIES SURVEY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA field hours during the field survey. Field observers were generally equipped with a compass, aerials, wildlife and plant identification books, binoculars, and a field notebook. During listed species transects, the biologist periodically stopped, looked for wildlife, signs of wildlife, and listened for wildlife vocalizations. Had listed species been observed, their approximate locations and their numbers would have been mapped on aerials and recorded in a field notebook on a daily basis. In the same fashion, non -listed wildlife species were recorded daily. The above survey methodologies were generally consistent with those prescribed by the FWC in the document titled "Wildlife Methodology Guidelines for Section 18.D of the Application for Development Approval" (FWC 1988) except that no small mammal sampling or herpetofaunal surveys were conducted. 2.2. Listed Plant Survey Over the course of conducting the survey for listed wildlife, the PE ecologist searched for plants listed by the Florida Department of Agriculture (FDA) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and those species defined by Collier County as rare and less rare. The state and federal agencies have categorized the various plant species based upon their relative abundance in natural communities. Those categorizations include "Endangered", "Threatened", and "Commercially Exploited". The protection afforded plants listed solely by FDA entails restrictions on harvesting or destroying plants found on private lands of another, or public lands, without permission and/or a permit from FDA. Unless the sale of plants is involved, there are no restrictions for landowners to impact such plants. These provisions are found in Section 581.185, FDA under State law. Rare and less rare species are protected in accordance with Collier County LDC Section 3.04.03. 2.3. Habitat/Vegetation Survey The habitat and vegetation survey included the preparation of a Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCCS) map delineating the major vegetation communities, landforms, and land uses present on the project site. A FLUCCS Map for the project site is provided in Figure 1 titled Existing Conditions. The methods and class descriptions found in the FLUCCS manual (FDOT, 1999) were generally followed when delineating and assigning areas to an appropriate FLUCCS category (class) or "codes". Plant communities were mapped using direct field observation and aerial photo interpretation. Current color aerial photos were plotted at 1" = 50' scale and were used in the field to map on -site vegetative communities. 4 P:\Active_Projects\P-LIVC-001\001_GMPA and PUD\Reports Packet Pg. 100 9.A.1.c PENINSULA ENGINEERING LIVINGSTON/VETERANS COMMERCIAL LISTED SPECIES SURVEY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA A factor in mapping vegetative associations and local habitats is the invasion by the exotic plant species, such as melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenervia) and Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius). Exotic vegetation on the site was primarily represented by both named species. Four levels of exotic density are defined and mapped using photo interpretation and field observation. Code modifiers are normally appended to the FLUCCS code to indicate the approximate density of exotic vegetation in the canopy or understory, as follows: E1 = Exotics 10-24% E2 = Exotics 25-49% E3 = Exotics 50-74% E4 = Exotics 75-84% 3. SURVEYRESULTS 3.1. Listed Wildlife Species Observed On Site Typically, following would be a summary of the listed wildlife species observed on site and the ramifications of the presence of each species; however, no state or federal listed wildlife were observed on site during the survey. Therefore, there is no such Figure in this report and the proposed PUD rezone is consistent with CCME Policy 7.1. Non -listed wildlife species were noted during the surveys and a list of those species is provided in Table 3. 3.2. Listed Wildlife Species Not Observed On Site But with Moderate Probability of Occurring The following is a discussion of listed wildlife species that were not confirmed during the survey as occurring on the Project site but which are considered to have probability of occurring due to the presence of suitable habitat or confirmed sightings in the region. These species are those identified as having a "possible" estimated occurrence in Table 4. There are no listed species having a "possible" estimated occurrence in Table 4. 3.3. Other Listed Wildlife Species Warranting Consideration Following is a discussion of listed wildlife species that have not been confirmed as occurring on the project site but which are considered to be potential visitors to the site due to the presence of suitable habitat or previous known sightings in the region. These species are those identified as having an "unlikely" estimated occurrence in Table 4. Eastern Indigo Snake The Eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon corais couperi) is listed by both the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and the FWC as Threatened, primarily due to historic commercial harvest for the 5 P:\Active_Projects\P-LIVC-001\001_GMPA and PUD\Reports Packet Pg. 101 9.A.1.c PENINSULA ENGINEERING LIVINGSTON/VETERANS COMMERCIAL LISTED SPECIES SURVEY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA pet industry. Generally, this species lives and hunts in a wide variety of habitats and their territories can cover large areas. No indigo snakes were observed on site; the site lacks burrows and habitat features that might otherwise support the species; and the adjacent land is under construction or is already improved as Livingston or Veterans Memorial roadways. Therefore, there is minimal potential for this species to occur on site. Florida bonneted bat The Florida bonneted bat (Eumops floridanus) is federally listed as Endangered. Little is known about the species; however, the presence of cavities or hollows within large and tall relatively uncluttered trees has been identified by FWS as a potentially important resource to support bonneted bat maternity roosts. Also, the FWS has determined that projects that result in the loss of greater than 50 acres of foraging habitat may impair an individual bat's ability to feed or breed. Two pine snags containing cavities of sufficient size to potentially support roosting by the bonneted bat were observed during the listed species survey. No signs of use by bats, such as smudging or the odor of quano, were detected at either snag. The cavities in both trees will be peeped using a wireless video recorder during state and federal environmental permitting to document bat presence/absence. Given the lack of external signs of cavity use, it is unlikely that the bonneted bat is using either for roosting. Additionally, since the Project is less than 20 acres in size, by following the FWS 2019 Consultation Guidelines (FWS, 2019) for the species, the project is not likely to have an adverse affect on the species. Big Cypress fox squirrel The Big Cypress fox squirrel (Sciurus niger avicennia) is listed as Threatened by the FWC and is considered a wetland dependent species by SFWMD. They are not assigned a special status designation by the FWS. No fox squirrels or signs of fox squirrels were observed within the project limits during the listed species survey. The site is vegetatively isolated due to major existing roadways on two sides of the property and on -going construction on the remaining two sides. Additionally, half of the site lacks the open park -like habitat structure that this species prefers, and the other half is composed of exotic -dominated vegetation. Given habitat isolation and the unfavorable habitat composition, the potential for this species to use the site is unlikely. 3.4. Listed Plant Species Observed On Site One (1) species of listed plants (listed per FDA list; and identified as "less rare" by Collier County LDC) was observed on site during the field survey. The species observed was the stiff -leafed wild pine (Tillandsia fasciculata). The location of a representative specimen is shown on the attached FLUCCS Map. No permit is required by FDA to impact the plant (so long as sale of the plants is not involved), and Collier County LDC Section 3.04.03 does not require rare or less rare plants to be relocated to off -site preserves (which is being proposed by the owner). Therefore, no further action is required for the species observed. No federal listed plant species were observed on site. Additional listed plant species are capable of occurring on site based on the presence of suitable habitat. A list of those species is provided in Table 5. 6 P:\Active_Projects\P-LIVC-001\001_GMPA and PUD\Reports Packet Pg. 102 9.A.1.c PENINSULA ENGINEERING LIVINGSTON/VETERANS COMMERCIAL LISTED SPECIES SURVEY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA 3.5. Habitat/Vegetation Survey The whole site has a slash pine canopy — the northern half having been degraded by Hurricane Irma (per aerial imagery and observed deadfall), exotic vegetation infestation, and power line maintenance (topped trees). The southern half of the site includes a dense saw palmetto groundcover with little else present. The property is vegetatively isolated due to adjacent roadways and ongoing residential construction. The FLUCCS code for each community along with a brief description and acreage are provided in Table 6. A detailed description of each FLUCCS code is provided in Appendix B. Figure 1 titled Existing Conditions provides a map showing regional development and the vegetative associations found on the project site. The 4.68-acre property is located outside of the Coastal High Hazard area and includes 4.44 acres of existing native vegetation of varying quality. Per LDC Section 3.05.07 B.1., the commercial development is required to preserve 10% of the existing native vegetation, or 0.44 acres. Due to the limited size of the development area and the inability to connect the required preservation area to other preserves, conservation areas, natural flowways or natural water bodies, the development proposes to satisfy the on -site preserve requirements off site as permitted in LDC Section 3.05.07 H.1.f. The mechanism to satisfy the off -site preservation (land donation or financial contribution) will be addressed during development review. 4. SUMMARY The following is a summary of the potential impacts of the proposed project to listed species. 4.1. Listed Plant & Wildlife Species The results of the listed species survey indicated that there are no listed wildlife occurring on site. The single state and County -listed plant species observed on site are relatively common to Southwest Florida. There are no state regulations prohibiting the owner from impacting them. Collier County LDC Section 3.04.03 does not require rare or less rare plants to be relocated to off - site preserves (which is being proposed by the owner). Therefore, no further action is required. There are potential state and federal listed wildlife species that could theoretically occur; however, due to the site's vegetative isolation, its general lack of suitable habitat, and its position in the relatively urban landscape, there is little possibility of their occurrence. Therefore, the project is not anticipated to have a measurable adverse affect on them. 7 P:\Active_Projects\P-LIVC-001\001_GMPA and PUD\Reports Packet Pg. 103 9.A.1.c PENINSULA ENGINEERING LIVINGSTON/VETERANS COMMERCIAL LISTED SPECIES SURVEY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA 5. REFERENCESCITED Florida Department of Transportation. 1999. Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System Procedure No. 550-010-001-a. Third Edition. Tallahassee, Florida. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. 2016. Florida's Imperiled Species Management Plan 2016-2026. Tallahassee, Florida. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. 1988. Wildlife Methodology Guidelines. Tallahassee, Florida. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2019. Florida Bonneted Bat Consultation Guidance. South Florida Ecological Services Office. Vero Beach, Florida. Weaver, R. E. and P. J. Anderson. 2010. Notes on Florida's Endangered and Threatened Plants. Contribution No. 38, 5th edition. 8 P:\Active_Projects\P-LIVC-001\001_GMPA and PUD\Reports Packet Pg. 104 PENINSULA ENGINEERING LIVINGSTON/VETERANS COMMERCIAL LISTED SPECIES SURVEY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA R TABLES 9 P:\Active_Projects\P-LIVC-001\001_GMPA and PUD\Reports Packet Pg. 105 PENINSULA ENGINEERING LIVINGSTON/VETERANS COMMERCIAL LISTED SPECIES SURVEY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA Table 1: Listed Species and Vegetation Survey Details Biologist Date Time of Da Weather Field Hours Bruce Layman 07/16/21 8:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m. 75°F, clear, calm 4.0 Bruce Layman 10/08/22 8:30 a.m. -10:30 a.m. 74°F, partly cloudy, NW wind 5 mph. 2.0 Total Hours 6.0 Table 2: Listed Plant and Wildlife Species Observed Common Name Scientific Name Site Habitat by FWC FWS FDA FLUCCS Status Status Status PLANTS Common air plant Tillandsia fasciculata All N/A N/A E WILDLIFE None All N/A N/A N/A FDA = Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services FWC = Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission FWS = United States Fish & Wildlife Service C E = Commercially Exploited E = Endangered N/A = Not Applicable Table 3: Non -listed Wildlife Species Observed Common Name Scientific Name BIRDS Northern cardinal Cardinalis cardinalis Blue jay Cyanocitta cristata Red -bellied woodpecker Melanerpes carolinus Mourning dove Zenoida mocroura Gray catbird Dumetella carolinensis Northern mockingbird Mimus polyglottos AMPHIBIANS & REPTILES Cuban anole Anolis sagrei MAMMALS Rabbit (scat) Sylvilagus floridanus Gray squirrel Sciurus caroliniensis Nine -banded armadillo (tracks) Dasypus novemcinctus 9.A.1.c 10 P:\Active_Projects\P-LIVC-001\001_GMPA and PUD\Reports Packet Pg. 106 PENINSULA ENGINEERING LIVINGSTON/VETERANS COMMERCIAL LISTED SPECIES SURVEY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA Table 4: Estimated Probability of Occurrence of Non -Observed Listed Faunal Species Status Estimated Occurrence* Common Name Scientific Name (FWC/FWS) BIRDS Probable Possible Unlikely Habitat by None MAMMALS Big Cypress fox squirrel Sciurus ni er avicennia T X 411,416 Florida bonneted bat Eumops floridanus E REPTILES X 411,416 Eastern indigo snake Drymarchon corais couperi T AMPHIBIANS X 411,416 None FWC = Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission FWS = United States Fish and Wildlife Service T =Threatened E = Endangered * Probable Occurrence = >50% estimated chance of occurrence on site. Possible Occurrence = <50% estimated chance of occurrence on site. Unlikely Occurrence = <5% estimated chance of occurrence on site. Table 5: Estimated Probability of Occurrence of Non -Observed Listed Floral Species Status Estimated Occurrence* Common Name Scientific Name (FDA/FWS) Probable Possible Unlikely Habitat by FLUCCS Wild pine (several) Tillandsia species T & E/NL X 411,416 FWS = United States Fish and Wildlife Service T = Threatened FDA = Food and Drug Administration E = Endangered NIL = Not Listed * Probable Occurrence =>50% estimated chance of occurrence on site. Possible Occurrence = <50% estimated chance of occurrence on site. Unlikely Occurrence = <5% estimated chance ofoccurrence on site. Table 6: Existing Vegetative Associations and Land Uses FLUCCS CODE FLUCCS DESCRIPTION TOTAL ACRES 411E2 Pine flatwoods, palmetto understory, Exotics 25%-49% 1.60 411E3 Pine flatwoods, palmetto understory, Exotics 50%-74% 0.32 416E3 Pine flatwoods, graminoid understory, Exotics 50%-74% 2.52 740 Disturbed land 0.24 OTAL 4.68 9.A.1.c 11 P:\Active_Projects\P-LIVC-001\001_GMPA and PUD\Reports Packet Pg. 107 PENINSULA ENGINEERING LIVINGSTON/VETERANS COMMERCIAL LISTED SPECIES SURVEY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA R APPENDIX A Existing Vegetative Association & Land Use Descriptions 12 P:\Active_Projects\P-LIVC-001\001_GMPA and PUD\Reports Packet Pg. 108 9.A.1.c PENINSULA ENGINEERING LIVINGSTON/VETERANS COMMERCIAL LISTED SPECIES SURVEY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA Existing Vegetative Association & Land Use Detailed Descriptions Pine Flatwoods — Palmetto Understory (FLUCCS 411) — This area is dominated by a slash pine (Pinus elliottii) canopy over a saw palmetto (Serenoa repens) dominated groundcover. Melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenervia), Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius), and ear -leaf acacia (Acacia auriculiformis) are present in the canopy and midstory. Bracken fern (Pteridium aquilinum) commonly exists in the openings in the saw palmetto and grape vine (Vitis rotundifolia) is present where there are openings in the canopy allowing sunlight to reach the forest floor. Pine Flatwoods — Graminoid Understory (FLUCCS 416) - This area is dominated by a slash pine canopy over little groundcover. Melaleuca, Brazilian pepper, and ear -leaf acacia are present in the canopy and midstory. Grape vine commonly exists in the openings in the canopy allowing sunlight to reach the forest floor. The canopy was heavily damaged during the passing of Hurricane Irma in 2017. Disturbed Land (FLUCCS 740) — This represents the edge of the Livingston Road right-of-way where the land appears to have been cleared for roadway construction. It has grown in with bracken fern, slash pine saplings, shrubby false buttonweed (Spermacoce verticillata), broomsedge (Andropogon virginicus), Mexican clover (Richardia brasiliensis), frogfruit (Phyla nodiflora) and other ruderal herbaceous species. Exotics 10-24% (Major FLUCCS Code + E1) This classification refers to a vegetative community that has been invaded by the exotic species Brazilian pepper such that it comprises 10 percent but no more than 24 percent of the vegetative cover. Exotics 25-49% (Major FLUCCS Code + E2) This additional classification refers to a vegetative community that has been invaded by Brazilian pepper and comprises 25 percent but no more that 49 percent of the vegetative cover. Exotics 50-75% (Major FLUCCS Code + E3) This additional classification refers to a vegetative community that has been invaded by Brazilian pepper and comprises 50 percent but no more that 75 percent of the vegetative cover. Exotics >75% (Major FLUCCS Code + E4) This additional classification refers to a vegetative community that has been invaded by Brazilian pepper and comprises greater than 75 percent of the vegetative cover, still retains at least 10% native tree canopy coverage. 13 P:\Active_Projects\P-LIVC-001\001_GMPA and PUD\Reports Packet Pg. 109 PENINSULA ENGINEERING LIVINGSTON/VETERANS COMMERCIAL LISTED SPECIES SURVEY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA c`o FIGURE 1 Existing Conditions 14 P:\Active_Projects\P-LIVC-001\001_GMPA and PUD\Reports Packet Pg. 110 3 PENINSULA ENGINEERING LIVINGSTON/VETERANS COMMERCIAL LISTED SPECIES SURVEY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA r# e to Tn=E'o�IiH CA'J!Ti —� 0 5Cy IGO 200' 400' 600• LEGEND PARCELBOUNDARY FLUCCS LIMITS MEANDERING PEDESTRIAN TRANSECT(2022) NATIVE HABITAT PER COLLIER COUNTY * TILLANDSIA FASCiCULATA FYPF L411E3 Q t� mamma VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD �., =1OTGGA TCOPYRIGHT OF C C LLI- CO— PROPERTY APF—SEA 2651 FLUCCS AREA CODE DESCRIPTION (AC) 411 E2 PINE FLATWOODS PALMETTO 1.fi0 UNDERSTORY (EXOTICS 25-49%) d17E3 PINE FLATWOODS PALMETTO 0.32 UNDERSTOAY(EXOITCS 50-75%} 41&E3 PINE FLATWOODS - GRAMINOID 2.52 UNDE23TORY {EXOTICS 50-75%} 740 DISTURBED LANDS 02A 4.65 ■y Pr-10JECi' L= OWNEif•L11EW TtCON SOLiANi- SeC' 13 --a— RGE' 2- ENINSULAIL:Y, D.3u.ODy n_E�YMAN VVVeFee LIVINGSTON °re °y ^ GN3°h^FFER ENGINEEI• LIVINGSTON °.� NGVEMSEx as2z VETERANS EXISTING VETERANS CONDITIONS COMMERCIAL, LLC. Pa�INum�- P-LIVG°o+-0a1 COMMERCIAL eN m� P� ,C,-0°'-X04 zss.aes.e7oa /V -I ,1 Pin-En9.com C-XO4 9.A.1.c 15 P:\Active_Projects\P-LIVC-001\001_GMPA and PUD\Reports Packet Pg. 111 9.A.1.c PENINSU L�M� ENGINEERING LIVINGSTON ROAD/VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD COMMERCIAL INFILL SUBDISTRICT GMPA (PL20220003225) EXHIBIT V.D PROJECT NARRATIVE, CRITERIA AND CONSISTENCY Proiect Information The property consists of two parcels located at the southeast intersection of Livingston Road and Veterans Memorial Boulevard and totaling +4.68 acres, located at the southeast intersection of Livingston Road and Veterans Memorial Boulevard, in Section 13, Township 48 South, Range 25 East. Both properties are owned by Livingston Veterans Commercial, LLC and are currently undeveloped. The northernmost parcel is the existing Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard Commercial Infill Subdistrict (Subdistrict), which was approved by Ordinance 2004-71. The Subdistrict property is limited to 50,000 square feet of C- 1 commercial uses and was rezoned to C-1 by Ordinance 2006-23. The southern parcel has a Future Land Use designation of Urban Residential and is zoned Agricultural. The properties to the north and west are Urban Residential and the property to the east and south are Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard East Residential Subdistrict. The table below identifies the zoning and existing land use of surrounding properties: Zoning Land Use North, opposite Veterans Memorial Blvd PUD Single -Family Residential East PUD Multi -Family Residential South PUD Multi -Family Residential West, opposite Livingston Road Agricultural Vacant Details of Request The purpose of this GMPA is to expand the Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard Commercial Infill Subdistrict (Subdistrict) to include the Urban Residential vacant parcel to the south and to allow for a greatervariety of commercial uses to serve the surrounding residential and institutional uses. The GMPA amends the Collier County Future Land Use Map and the Subdistrict Inset Map. Text changes to the Subdistrict language within the Future Land Use Element update the acreage, expand the commercial uses allowed on the property and revise the development standards. Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Blvd Commercial Infill Subdistrict GMPA — PL20220003225 December 1, 2023 2600 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, Florida, 34105 Office 239.403.6700 Fax 239.261.1797 Fla Engineer CA 28275 Fla Landscape CA LC26000632 Fla Surveyor/Mapper LB8479 Page 1 1 Packet Pg. 112 9.A.1.c PENINSULA ENGINEERING Q A companion PUDZ application (PL20220003226) has been submitted to establish commercial zoning and appropriate development standards for the property that is consistent with the Subdistrict. A copy of the proposed PUDA application is included with this application. Inctifiratinn The parcel being added to the Subdistrict is currently vacant with direct access onto Livingston Road. Due to its limited size and access limitations, it is unlikely to be developed for residential uses. Incorporating this property into the Subdistrict allows for better site access and the ability to expand the commercial uses on the property. The closest retail commercial properties to this Subdistrict are approximately 2- miles to the north and south, at Bonita Beach Road and Immokalee Road, respectfully. Expanding the commercial opportunities at this location will reduce the amount of vehicle miles traveled by providing community retail and service uses for the surrounding community. The property is located at the intersection of an arterial road (Livingston Road) and a future collector road (Veterans Memorial Boulevard), making it a suitable location for neighborhood commercial uses to support the surrounding residential community and the public schools that exist and are planned for the area. The new Collier County High School is planned west of the site and will be located on Veterans Memorial Boulevard. Veterans Memorial Boulevard is scheduled to be a four -lane road connecting Livingston Road to Old 41 and US 41. The GMPA is consistent with Florida Statutes and the Collier County Growth Management Plan, as noted below. CONSISTENCY WITH FLORIDA STATUTES AND THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN FS Section 163.3177(6)(a)(2) — Required and Optional Elements of a Comprehensive Plan The future land use plan and plan amendments shall be based upon surveys, studies, and data regarding the area, as applicable, including: a. The amount of land required to accommodate anticipated growth. b. The projected permanent and seasonal population of the area. c. The character of undeveloped land. d. The availability of water supplies, public facilities, and services. e. The need for redevelopment, including the renewal of blighted areas and the elimination of nonconforming uses which are inconsistent with the character of the community. f. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to or closely proximate to military installations. g. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to an airport as defined in s. 330.35 and consistent with s. 333.02. h. The discouragement of urban sprawl. Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Blvd Commercial Infill Subdistrict GMPA — PL20220003225 December 1, 2023 2600 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, Florida, 34105 Office 239.403.6700 Fax 239.261.1797 Page 1 2 Fla Engineer CA 28275 Fla Landscape CA LC26000632 Fla Surveyor/Mapper LB8479 Packet Pg. 113 9.A.1.c PENINSULA ENGINEERING i. The need for job creation, capital investment, and economic development that will strengthen and diversify the community's economy. j. The need to modify land uses and development patterns within antiquated subdivisions. Response: The proposed amendment is supported by data and analysis and a study of the market conditions in the vicinity of the property, which indicate that additional supply of commercial acreage is supportable for existing and anticipated populations based on adopted professional methodologies. This area has experienced growth since the original Subdistrict approval in 2004 with the development of additional single-family and multifamily development, as well as new schools. This 4.68-acre site is ideal to capture trips already on the network to service the demands for retail goods. The applicant has also prepared a full traffic impact analysis, which indicates that there are no capacity or operational issues associated with the proposed plan amendment. An environmental assessment has also been completed and the professional opinion of the biologist is that there are no protected flora of consequence, and no protected fauna, inhabiting the site, the site contains no identified wetlands, and there are no significant or rare vegetative communities located on site. The undeveloped land is located at the intersection of a signalized intersection. The applicant contends that the character of this undeveloped property is unlike other nearby properties given the access to a signalized intersection of an arterial and collector roadway with available water and sewer service and is proximate to public facilities and services. There are no adjacent or proximate military installations or airports. The 2.39-acre parcel being added into the Subdistrict is not appropriate or likely to be developed as a stand-alone agricultural or residential use and its inclusion into the Subdistrict will help to modify land uses and development patterns in a well -planned manner. FS Section 163.3177 (8) Future Land Use Map Amendments 8. Future Land use map amendments shall be based upon the following analyses: a. An analysis of the availability of facilities and services b. An analysis of the suitability of the plan amendment for its proposed use considering the character of the undeveloped land, soils, topography, natural resources, and historic resources on site. c. An analysis of the minimum amount of land needed to achieve the goals and requirements of this section. Response: The property is suitable for the proposed commercial uses given availability of utilities, its location at a signalized intersection of an arterial and collector roadway, and the potential to capture vehicle trips already on the high -volume roadway. The undeveloped acreage being added to the Subdistrict has similar soils, topography and natural resource characteristics as the existing Subdistrict and is the minimum amount of land needed to provide commercial goods and services for the adjacent residential and institutional uses. Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Blvd Commercial Infill Subdistrict Page 1 3 G M PA — PL20220003225 December 1, 2023 2600 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, Florida, 34105 Office 239.403.6700 Fax 239.261.1797 Fla Engineer CA 28275 Fla Landscape CA LC26000632 Fla Surveyor/Mapper LB8479 Packet Pg. 114 9.A.1.c PENINSULA�� ENGINEERING FS Section 163.3187(1) — Process for Adoption of Small -Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment 1. A small-scale development amendment maybe adopted under the following conditions: a. The proposed amendment involves a use of 50 acres or fewer and: b. The proposed amendment does not involve a text change to the goals, policies, and objectives of the local government's comprehensive plan, but only proposes a land use change to the future land use map for a site -specific small scale development activity. However, text changes that relate directly to, and are adopted simultaneously with, the small-scale future land use map amendment shall be permissible under this section. c. The property that is the subject of the proposed amendment is not located within an area of critical state concern, unless the project subject to the proposed amendment involves the construction of affordable housing units meeting the criteria of S. 420.0004(3), and is located within an area of critical state concern designated by S. 380.0552 or by the Administration Commission pursuant to S. 380.05(1). Response: The GMPA qualifies as a small-scale development amendment. The proposed Subdistrict totals 4.68-acres. The amendment does not involve text amendment to the goals, policies and objectives of the Collier County Growth Management Plan and is located outside of the Area of Critical State Concern. GMP Future Land Use Element: OBJECTIVE 5: Implement land use policies that promote sound planning, protect environmentally sensitive lands and habitat for listed species while protecting private property rights, ensure compatibility of land uses and further the implementation of the Future Land Use Element. Response: The proposed GMPA and PUDZ are consistent with this Objective. The property does not include any environmentally sensitive lands and habitat for listed species. The proposed development utilizes sound planning practices to protect private property rights of adjacent land owners and ensure compatibility with adjacent uses. Policy 5.6: New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code (Ordinance 04-41, adopted June 22, 2004 and effective October 18, 2004, as amended). Response: The proposed development is compatible and complimentary with the surrounding land uses. This commercial infill development abuts higher density multi family residential uses and is proximate to existing and planned public school facilities. Its location at a signalized intersection of an arterial and future collector roadway is an ideal location for community retail and services uses. The proposed uses primarily consist of those allowed in C-1 through C-3 zoning districts, with the exception of carwashes and self -storage uses. Self -storage uses, if developed, will be limited to indoor, air-conditioned facilities that are designed to resemble an office building. These self -storage facilities generate significantly Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Blvd Commercial Infill Subdistrict Page 14 GMPA — PL20220003225 December 1, 2023 2600 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, Florida, 34105 Office 239.403.6700 Fax 239.261.1797 Fla Engineer CA 28275 Fla Landscape CA LC26000632 Fla Surveyor/Mapper LB8479 Packet Pg. 115 9.A.1.c PENINSULA�� ENGINEERING fewer trips and have far fewer impacts on surrounding developments than other commercial uses. The companion CPUD zoning includes development standards and perimeter buffers to adjacent residential uses. Policy 5.7: Encourage the use of land presently designated for urban intensity uses before designating other areas for urban intensity uses. This shall occur by planning for the expansion of County owned and operated public facilities and services to the existing lands designated for urban intensity uses, the Rural Settlement District (formerly known as North Golden Gate), and the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, before servicing new areas. Response: The property is located within the Collier County Urban Area and is located at the intersection of an arterial and collector roadway. Properties to the north and south are developed, and utilities are available to serve the development. This infill vacant property is ideal for urban intensity. Policy 7.1: The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. Response: The property is located at the intersection of an arterial and collector roadway and proposes to have driveway connections that meet the intersection spacing requirements to both Livingston Road and Veterans Memorial Boulevard. Policy 7.3: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and their interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. Response: The adjacent Allura multifamily development that abuts the subject property to the east and south includes an interconnection to the subject property, as required by RPUD, Ord. 2019-22. The proposed commercial development will provide cross -access easement to the Allura development, which is shown on the Master Concept Plan (MCP) of the companion PUDZ Transportation Element: Policy 5.1: The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Blvd Commercial Infill Subdistrict Page 15 GMPA — PL20220003225 December 1, 2023 2600 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, Florida, 34105 Office 239.403.6700 Fax 239.261.1797 Fla Engineer CA 28275 Fla Landscape CA LC26000632 Fla Surveyor/Mapper LB8479 Packet Pg. 116 9.A.1.c PENINSULA ENGINEERING Q approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and c. For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project's significant impacts on all roadways. Response: The traffic generated from the proposed commercial development will not cause the adjacent roadways to exceed the minimum level of service (LOS) as demonstrated in the attached Traffic Impact Statement. Conservation and Coastal Management Element: Objectives 6.1: Protect native vegetative communities through the application of minimum preservation requirements. Objective 6.2: Protect and conserve wetlands and the natural functions of wetlands pursuant to the appropriate policies under Goal 6. Response: The 4.68-acre property is located outside of the Coastal High Hazard area and includes 4.44-acres of existing native vegetation of varying quality. Per LDC Section 3.05.07 8.1., the commercial development is required to preserve 10% of the existing native vegetation, or 0.44-acres. Due to the limited size of the development area and the inability to connect the required preservation area to other preserves, conservation areas, natural flowways or natural water bodies, the development proposes to satisfy the on - site preserve requirements off site as permitted in LDC Section 3.05.07 H.1.f. Objective 7.1: Direct incompatible land uses away from listed animal species and their habitats. (The County relies on the listing process of State and Federal agencies to identify species that require special protection because of their endangered, threatened, or species of special concern status. Listed animal species are those species that the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission has designated as endangered, threatened, or species of special concern, in accordance with Rules 68A-27.003, 68A-27.004, and 68A-27.005, F.A.C. and those species designated by various federal agencies as Endangered and Threatened species published in 50 CFR 17.) Response: The property does not contain any listed animal species or habitats. Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Blvd Commercial Infill Subdistrict GMPA — PL20220003225 December 1, 2023 2600 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, Florida, 34105 Office 239.403.6700 Fax 239.261.1797 Page 1 6 Fla Engineer CA 28275 Fla Landscape CA LC26000632 Fla Surveyor/Mapper LB8479 Packet Pg. 117 9.A.1.c 0 RETAIL, FUEL STATION, SELF STORAGE NEEDS ANALYSIS FOR SUBJECT PROPERTY AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LIVINGSTON ROAD AND VETERANS MEMORIAL BOULEVARD COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA May 3, 2022 Prepared for AJS Realty Group, LLC 5020 Tamiami Trail N., #112 Naples, FL 34103 Prepared by fill- plann'g—E.ecu '—Results_ Real Estate Econometrics, Inc. Real Estate Econometrics, Inc. Suite 100 707 Orchid Drive Naples, Florida 34102 (239) 269-1341 Ree-i.com Packet Pg. 118 9.A.1.c Background AJS Realty Group LLC ("Applicant") is proposing to submit a small-scale Growth Management Plan Amendment to expand and modify the Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard Commercial Infill Subdistrict ("Subdistrict") by including a 2.39-acre portion of a 4.55-acre parcel ("Subject Property") that is partially included in the Subdistrict. The Subject Property is located at the southeast corner of the Livingston Road and Veterans Memorial Boulevard intersection in Collier County, Florida ("County"). The portion of the Subject Property within the Subdistrict is 2.16-acres and is zoned C-1 (Ord. 06-23). The Amendment seeks to increase the Subdistrict from the existing 2.16-acres to 4.55-acres and expand the permitted commercial uses allowed in the Subdistrict. The 2.39-acre parcel being added to the Subdistrict is designated as Urban Residential on the Future Land Use Map and is zoned Rural Agricultural. A companion application to rezone the property to a Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD, PL20220003225) ("CPUD") is being submitted to establish specific development standards and a master plan for the Subject Property. The CPUD will propose the potential for development of approximately 50,000 square feet of commercial retail space (C-2 Zoning), a fuel station/convenience store (C- 2 zoning) and/or a proposed 100,000 square foot in -door self -storage facility (C- 5 Zoning). The Applicant has requested Real Estate Econometrics, Inc. ("Consultant") prepare a commercial retail needs analysis, a fuel station needs analysis, and/or an in -door self -storage facility market study for the Property that will be submitted with the Comprehensive Plan Change application being prepared by the Applicant. This Study is comprised of four parts; the site assessment, population growth around the subject property, the market supply and demand analysis for each use, and conclusions. 1.0 Site Assessment 1.1 Subject Property Attributes The Subject Property is located at the southeast corner of Livingston Road and Veterans Memorial Boulevard, approximately two miles north of Immokalee Road, in Section 13 — Township 48 — Range 25. An aerial locator photo in Figure 1.1.1 is located on the next page followed by a summary of the Subject Property's legal, location, zoning, and land use attributes obtained from the Collier County Property Appraiser website on the page after Figure 1.1.1. Packet Pg. 119 701, 'E •.'k •� �`v,: �'Jd•If1 �4�'lkira �� 'Mk1 'R� '�� - • $ •r }� it �� Fy! T� tiY _� 1ki�i ', t*�F fib, iLl#'Fk �. .,, Lei I4.'' 1 . ✓::o : r1;i;w'�; , r��+t` ": "ate 4 + `Pard 1b: '6649720005 y ` ''Parcel 10: 00150080006 wry •� y '� � r •�bM[� � .owe.� - T om•.•- _ _ - 42gH .d�1 9.A.1.c Parcel 1 Pr pP q Summary ®®� Pwml No 00149720005 illy Add—,-PWaLl r SI1a Chy NAPLES SRr Zonr'Nptl 34110 Name/AM— LNINGSTONVETERANS COMMERCIAL LLC A980'MIAMI TRAIL N d201 CRy NAPLES 51u1r FL Zlp 34103 Map No. Se pNP, S.r TeIm1Fh1P Ranpr AF 'Lat .I 3A13 00010V 0263A53 13 AB 25 2_16 L1911 13 A9 25 N W 1 /A OF N W I /A OF N W I /A OF NEt /A LESS LIVINGSTON RD DESC IN OR 2597 PG I684 M WA—. 92 Nf111RLI9btsAa'Lalculatlonr Sub JCprW0 100 ACREAGE HEADER SFhcol 01h. TdsI Use Cede. le-VACANTCONI—RCIAL AH89 60291 109183 Latest Sales History 2021 Certified Tax Roll ��I MSAnx. aSa e.a 1. L..�Rer.aaR.r rsw5xr ncgx.99I Deb bee6paps A-- Land Valor 19A0,89s 0A/2820 S7 SB-1612 s1,2Ts,000 ,.l Imp— Velur S0 03/01/I1 02/ON0A 403fi_339 5260,00p S 100 r=7 M. VA.. Y9AD,69s 09/pB/Ofi 4399- 11 �3.p2-1)S SO I.2 Aaedud Value Y9Aa,B9$ OB/OBI06 ROBS-1T3] 52,000,000 1-7 &ho 1Taaabir Valor 59a0,H95 06/22/89 144..4-JO 5105.000 Ta 3°A�H9i OB/B9 1A643aT 56T,S00 nValue nMai...s..co......ro •N..w.ci �..e.ra xl..lr�Sr WEa 03201/p1/72 5En76111 S 0 Parcel 2 Preprrty Summary ®�� Parcel Ne oQI500e0006 Ptr Ad4-1l DlFClelmee P11 Cn NAPLES Ate Z9re'Notr 34110 Name/Addrnl LIVINGSION VETERANS COANdERCIAL d 9SO IAMIAMI TR N+201 CRy NAPLES St— Ft ZIP 34103 MAP N9 S1eap Np SMIon T9—W, RNgr Arras: 151_-w- 3A13 0001W0353A13 13 A6 25 2,39 Lrpa3 13 Ab 25S 1/4 OF NWI/A OF NW/TA OF NEIYA LEA LIVINGST A! RO DESC IN OR 2597 PG 1692 MII6pr Ares0 150 MIBAAe RAtta 0 '41m1A1lAna SIb/fordo 106. ACREAGE HEADER 51lleel O1ALr —.1 U&ILL &O 99. ACREAGE NOT ZONED AGRICULTURAL 4169 6.0293 10.9193 Latest Sales History 2021 Certified Tax Roll rR.1 nr receinr.r5a9a Is,r6;n•nrNaerr Dale 11-kPow Amnunl Lnnd Value S 591,500 ]l07J20 6157-246B SVs.000 „, ImprevM Value SO f2/0A/id 565]-2Afi5 9R r-1 McM1et WWe S597 S00 06/25/OS 03/OBl9d 36]615A6 1510-2233 SO YTB,S00 r'r A.H"rd VAWe 55.7.500 0]/01/eB r365-16BA 5e r15rNPOl Temple Value S 59',501 10/011B5 115]-2338 SO r-1 TaAabN Valu[ S i9-,SRC OB/01TBA 1096.619 525,000 uNVVun Pse•Arw. quP OrAY S.rrdru.M.e.IrnwMrl4.M Packet Pg. 121 9.A.1.c 1.2 Location Analysis The Subject Property's strategic location allows reasonable access to the site and provides for an ideal location for commercial activities. The 304-unit Allura apartment complex fronts the Property's eastern and southern boundaries. As noted above, the Subject Property is strategically located to accommodate the proposed C-2 commercial uses and/or the proposed indoor self -storage use. The commercial offerings will have high visibility to Livingston Road. Figure 1.1.1 previously shows the location of the property. 2.0 Population Growth Around Subject Property 2.1 Overview of Florida Population Florida is currently the nation's fourth most populous state, home to an estimated 19.1 million people according to the Census Bureau. By the year 2030, Florida's population is projected to total 23.5 million people according to the medium range series from the University of Florida's Bureau of Economic and Business Research. This represents an increase of 245,000 per year. Florida's population growth is depicted in Figure 2.1.1 below. This shows the latest projections of growth by county for the year 2030. As you can see, the most heavily populated counties in Florida are Broward, Miami -Dade and Palm Beach counties in Southeast Florida; Hillsborough and Pinellas counties in the Tampa metro market; Orange County in Central Florida, and Duval County in the Jacksonville metro area. Figure 2.1.1 2030 Population Projections by County Florida Counties Population Projections 2030 0 100,000 or less _ 1200,001 - 250,000 _ 250,001 - 500,000 _ 500,001- 11000,000 _ 1,000,001 i w�E Source: University of Florida Bureau of Economic and Business Research Packet Pg. 122 9.A.1.c 2.2 Overview of Collier County Population Growth. Currently, there are an estimated 373,000 people living year-round in Collier County. Since the 2000 Census, the County's population has increased by nearly 45%, the equivalent of 115,074 new residents as shown in Figure 2.2.1 below. Looking ahead, the County will continue to gain new residents at a rate greater than that of the state of Florida. By the year 2045, the population of Collier County is projected to total 597,695 residents. This is a projected annual growth rate of just over 2% from 2015 to 2040 compared to Florida's annual growth rate of 1.08% during the same time period. Figure 2.2.1 — Collier County Forecasted Population Growth Countywide Total Population Growth 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 Permanent Population Estimates and Forecasts 347,002 390,937 426,443 455,246 498,491 545,844 597,695 5-year Percent Increase 12.66% 9.08% 6.75% 9.50% 9.50% 9.50% 2.12% = Average Annual Growth Rate between 2020 and 2045 9.50% = Average 5-Year Growth between 2020 and 2030 to forecast 2035-2045 1.90% = Average Annual Growth Rate between 2020 and 2030 Source: Collier County Zoning Division June 19, 2021 Population growth in Collier County is primarily due to the in -migration of baby boomer retirees plus the recent insurgence of population that is fleeing the northern states with significant state income taxes. The number of baby boomers reaching retirement age peaked in 2020. (Rest of page left intentionally blank) Packet Pg. 123 9.A.1.c 3.0 Retail Needs Analysis for Subject Property 3.1 Retail Market Area Determination The Applicant is proposing developing 50,000 square feet of commercial retail space on the Subject Property. By definition, a 50,000 square foot commercial retail center falls under the neighborhood category. The Urban Land Institute ("ULI") defines commercial shopping centers in three categories. The categories are neighborhood, community and regional. Those categories are characterized by drive times and size in square feet as shown in Table 3.3.1 below. Table 3.1.1 Neighborhood Up to 10-Minute Drive Time = <100,000 Sq. Ft. Community 20-30 Minute Drive Time = 100,000 to 300,000 Sq. Ft. Regional 30-Minute and over Drive Time = >300,000 Sq. Ft. Source: Urban Land Institute, Dollars and Cents of Shopping Centers, 2008' The Subject Property proposed development plan would categorize it as a medium size Neighborhood Center. ULI defines Neighborhood Centers in their 2008 Dollars and Cents of Shopping Centers as follows: "The neighborhood center provides for the sale of convenience goods (foods, drugs and sundries) and personal services (laundry and dry cleaning, barbering, shore repairing, etc.) for the day-to-day living needs of the immediate neighborhood. It is built around a supermarket as the principal tenant and typically contains a gross leasable area of about 60,000 square feet. In practice, it may range in size from 30,001 to 100,000 square feet."' - Anita Kramer, Urban Land Institute Dollars and Cents of Shopping Centers / The Score 2008, (Washington, D.C., ULI and International Council of Shopping Centers, 2008) Page 5. Packet Pg. 124 9.A.1.c Drive time areas are calculated by Environmental Systems Research Institute ("ESRI"). The ESRI Business Analyst program calculates drive times by actual street networks and posted speed limits. In general, Neighborhood sites have a drive time area of up to 10 minutes, Community sites have a drive time area of 10 to 20 minutes depending on the size and Regional sites have a drive time area of 30 minutes and over depending on the size. Since the Subject Property is proposed for 50,000 square feet of commercial retail space, it falls within the neighborhood category and the supply/demand analysis will be performed on a 10-minute drive time market are. Figure 2.4.1 below depicts the 10-minute drive time area from the Subject Property. Some of the drive time boundaries go into Lee County but those parcels were not included since they are in a different county. Figure 2.4.1 Subject Property 10-Minute Drive Time Market Area 10-Minute Drive Time from Subject Property Source: ESRI ArcGIS Business Analyst Mapping System Packet Pg. 125 9.A.1.c The following table shows the U.S. Census demographic profile of the population that lives within the 10-minute drive time of the subject site. Table 2.4.1 esria Demographic n Income Profile AJS 10-Minute Drive Time In Collier Area: 24.18 square miles Prepared by Esri Summary Census 7010 2021 2026 Population 32,440 38,309 41,303 Households 14,904 18,025 19,523 Families 9,740 11,478 12,363 Average Household Size 2.15 2.11 2.10 Owner Occupied Housing Units 11,106 13,745 14,873 Renter Occupied Housing Units 3,798 4,280 4,650 Median Age 52.0 56.4 57.8 Trends: 2021-2026 Annual Rate Area State National Population 1.52% 1.31% 0.71N Households 1.611% 1.271/. C.71 Families 1.50% 1.22% 0.541% Owner HHs 1.59 % 1.45 % 0.91 % Median Household Income 2.22°% 2.38% 2.41N 2021 2026 Households by Income Number Percent Number Percent e$15,000 1,283 7.1% 1,118 5.7% $15,000 - $24,999 8D7 4.5% 694 3.5% $25,000 - $34,999 1,195 6.6% 1,075 5.5% $35,000 - $49,999 2,016 11'2% 1,927 9.91/6 $50,000 - $74,999 2,459 13.6% 2,511 12.9°% $75,000 - $99,999 2,5D7 14.59/r, 2,886 14.81% $100,000 - $149,999 3,110 17.3% 3,632 18.5% $150,000 - $199,999 1,585 8.8% 1,993 10.21/. $200,000+ 2,962 15.4% 3,686 1S.9% Median Household Income $85,217 $95,095 Average Household Income $124,520 $141,182 Per Capita Income $58,068 $66,094 Census 2010 2021 2026 Population by Age Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent 0 - 4 1,279 3.9% 1,329 3.5% 1,435 3.5% 5 - 9 1,469 4.5% 1,439 3.a% 1,550 3.3% 10 - 14 1,630 5.0°% 1,568 4.1110 1,645 4.0N is- 19 1,589 4.9 % 1,603 4.2% 1,587 3.81% 20 - 24 1,258 3.9% 1,529 4.0% 1,472 3.5% 25 - 34 2,655 8.2% 3,472 9.1 % 3,683 8.9 % 35 - 44 3,298 10.2% 3,476 9.1-A 3,961 4.6% 45 - 54 4,374 13.5% 3,927 10.3% 3,930 9.5°/ 55 - 64 5,053 15.6-/ 5,956 15.5% 5,730 13.9% 65 - 74 5,442 16.8% 7,025 18.3% 7,879 19.1% 75 - 84 3,213 9.9°% 4,960 12.9% 5,971 14.5% 85+ 1,169 3.6% 2,001 5.21b 2,460 5.01% Census 2010 2021 2026 Race and Ethnicity Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent White Alone 30,302 93.4% 35,046 91.5% 37,328 90.4% Black Alone 721 2.2 % 1,033 2.71/o 1,248 3.0 American Indian Alone 33 0.1 % 40 0.1% 45 D.1 % Asian Alone 466 1.4% SO5 2.1% 1,050 2.5% Pacific Islander Alone 12 0.0% 20 0.1% 24 0.1% Some Other Race Alone 537 1.7°% 916 2.1°/ 971 2.4 % Two or More Races 368 1.11/. 549 1.4% 637 1.5% Hispanic Origin (Any Race) 3,581 11.0% 5,335 13.91/1 6,498 15.7% Data Note: Income Is ex pressecl in curs ent dollafs. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary Fie 1. Esn farecasts For 2021 and 2026. Source: ESRI and U.S. Census Bureau Packet Pg. 126 9.A.1.c In order to determine commercial demand coming from the 10-minute drive time market area, it is important to determine the ratio between the overall County population and the population in the 10-minute drive time market area. In 2020, the population in the 10-minute drive time market area was 38,309, which was 9.8% of the County population. That percent stays steady at 9.7% in 2025 according to the Census forecast compared to the County's total population forecast. The future projection. The Consultant used that percentage ratio of 10- minute drive time population to the County's forecasted population growth to determine the future 10-minute drive time population growth as shown in Table 2.4.2 below. Table 2.4.2 10-Minute Drive Time Population Forecast Year 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 Collier County GMD Population Forecast 390,937 426,443 --- --- --- --- 10-Minute Market Area Census Population 38,309 41,303 --- --- --- --- Share 9.8% 9.7% 9.7% 9.7% 9.7% 9.7% Collier County GMD Population Forecast 455,246 498,491 545,844 597,695 10-Minute Market Area Census Population 44,093 48,281 52,868 57,890 Source: Collier County Zoning Division June 19, 2021, U.S. Census 2020 3.0 MARKET ANALYSIS 3.1 Market Area Demand The most reliable indicator of commercial market demand in the County is to determine the amount of commercial square footage built in the County then divide that total amount by the County population to arrive at square feet per capita (person) in the existing market. Historical commercial development in relation to population growth encompasses all aspects of land development over time including geography, economic fluctuations and various commercial uses as they relate to market demographics. Collier County in particular has shown a propensity for commercial development to follow residential development as the primary economic drivers are tourism, agriculture and real estate construction. The limited economic diversification fuels residential development, which then supports commercial development as peoples moving into the County require goods and services. Therefore, the commercial square feet per capita measure takes into account all of the factors previously mentioned. Packet Pg. 127 9.A.1.c The Consultant utilized Collier County Property Appraiser data updated as of January 1, 2022 to determine the total amount of industrial square footage and commercial square footage built in the County as of that date. Since the goal is to determine the per capita square foot demand in the County, acreage not built upon was not used in this calculation. Since there are no industrial uses contemplated for the Subject Property, only developed commercial space was used in this calculation. In order to make an accurate calculation, the Consultant then used the 2020 Collier County population from the 2020 U.S. Census to match the supply data and calculate the commercial square footage per capita in the County. The Commercial square foot demand per capita in Collier County is 78.78 as shown in Table 3.1.1 below. Table 3.1.1 — Collier County Per Capita Commercial Square Feet Demand Commercial Type Square Feet Per Capita Total Square Feet 42,878,046 111.40 Developed Industrial: 12,554,600 32.62 Developed Commercial: 30,322,246 78.78 Current (2020) Collier County Population: 384,902 Source: Collier County Property Appraiser and 2020 U.S. Census To further refine the commercial square foot demand per capita to the 10-minute drive time market area, the Consultant extracted all of the commercial square footage built within the drive time market area and divided that total by the 2020 U.S. Census population for the 10-minute drive time market area to get the refined commercial square foot demand per capita as shown in Table 3.1.2 below. Table 3.1.2 — Market Area Per Capita Commercial Square Feet Demand Total Commercial Square Feet in Market Area: 2,772,505 10-Minute Drive Time Population: 38,309 10-Minute Drive Time Per Capita Demand: 72.37 Source: Collier County Property Appraiser, U.S. Census and Consultant Packet Pg. 128 9.A.1.c With the 10-minute drive time market area estimated population and the commercial demand in square -feet per capita determined, the Consultant calculated the estimated commercial square footage demand for the 10-minute drive time market area through the year 2045 as shown in Table 3.1.3 below. Table 3.1.3 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 County Population 390,937 426,443 455,246 498,491 545,844 597,695 10-Minute Drive Time Population 38,309 41,303 44,093 48,281 52,868 57,890 Demand Square Feet Per Capita 72.37 72.37 72.37 72.37 72.37 72.37 Commercial Square Feet Demand 2,772,505 2,989,187 3,191,084 3,494,214 3,826,139 4,189,595 Source: Collier County Zoning Division, Collier County Property Appraiser, U.S. Census and Consultant 3.2 Market Area Supply The next step in the commercial needs analysis is to determine the amount of existing and potential competing commercial square footage in the 10-minumte drive time market area. The Consultant performed a three-part process in the ARCgis desktop program to determine both the existing and potential competing commercial parcels that would be used in the analysis. The first step in the process is to join all of the Collier County Property Appraiser data with the ARCgis program. The second step is to join the 10-minute drive time market area overlay shape file with the Property Appraiser data. The final step is to join the commercial inventory data obtained from Collier County Property Appraiser with the 10-minute drive time market area. All of the commercial parcels included within the 10-minute drive time market area are shown in Appendix A (Page 35) at the end of this report. The Consultant then used a floor area ratio ("FAR") that consists of using all of the commercial square footage built in the drive time market area and dividing that by the developed acreage to obtain an average square footage per acre FAR that is indicative of the true market area supply being developed to meet the commercial demand being generated from the drive time market area. Table 3.2.1 below indicates the total amount of existing and potential commercial square feet in the 10-minute drive time market area. Packet Pg. 129 9.A.1.c Table 3.2.1 Parcels Acres Square Feet FAR Developed Commercial 146 346.45 2,772,505 8,003 Undeveloped Commercial 50 93.28 746,462 8,003 Totals 196 439.73 3,518,967 Source: Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section, Collier County Property Appraiser and ESRI ARCgis mapping system 3.3 Supply — Demand Analysis The final step in the Commercial Needs Analysis is to put the supply and demand calculations together in order to determine the oversupply or undersupply of commercial space in the 15-minute drive time area both with the current existing and potential commercial square footage and with the proposed project acreage being included in the supply totals. Table 3.3.1 on the next page shows that calculation. Table 3.3.1 Retail Demand (sq. ft.) 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 10-Minute Drive Time Market Area Square Feet Demand 2,772,505 2,989,187 3,191,084 3,494,214 3,826,139 4,189,595 Retail Supply Developed 2,772,505 2,772,505 2,772,505 2,772,505 2,772,505 2,772,505 Vacant 746,462 746,462 --- --- 746,462 --- 746,462 --- 746,462 --- 746,462 --- --- --- Total Supply 3,518,967 3,518,967 --- 3,518,967 --- 3,518,967 --- 3,518,967 --- 3,518,967 Allocation Ratio 1.27 1.18 1.10 1.01 0.92 0.84 Source: Collier County Zoning Division, Collier County Property Appraiser, ESRI ARCgis mapping system and the Consultant Adding the proposed 50,000 square feet of commercial space proposed for the Subject Property is shown in Table 3.3.2 below. Table 3.3.2 Retail Demand (sq. ft.) 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 10-Minute Drive Time Market Area Square Feet Demand 2,772,505 2,989,187 3,191,084 3,494,214 3,826,139 4,189,595 Retail Supply Developed 2,822,505 2,822,505 2,822,505 2,822,505 2,822,505 2,822,505 Vacant 796,462 796,462 --- --- 796,462 --- 796,462 --- 796,462 --- 796,462 --- --- --- Total Supply 3,618,967 3,618,967 --- 3,618,967 --- 3,618,967 --- 3,618,967 --- 3,618,967 Allocation Ratio 1.31 1.21 1.13 1.04 0.95 0.86 Source: Collier County Zoning Division, Collier County Property Appraiser, ESRI ARCgis mapping system and the Consultant Packet Pg. 130 9.A.1.c The future demand generally looks out to the jurisdiction comprehensive plan's horizon year, which is currently either 2025 to 2040 depending on the jurisdiction's comprehensive plan and growth management plan horizon year requirements. In Collier County's case, the Comprehensive Plan's horizon year is 2030 which matches the County's 10-year planning horizon. It is at this point of the analysis that has caused an anomaly in determining a true economic supply and demand result. On the supply side, it is relatively easy to determine the amount of existing and approved supply from the property appraiser data. The difficulty lies in the vacant non -approved potential lands. Collier County Staff requires the Applicant to take all of those lands that have a commercial overlay on them and include them as supply by putting a floor area ratio figure to the acreage. The issue becomes apparent when all of the lands that are not in the existing or approved category are included in the particular land use analysis. By putting all of the potential lands in the supply category, the assumption is that all of that land would be developed as that particular land use overlay and nothing else. The flaw in that representation is all of those vacant approved parcels and parcels designated by the FLUM as having the potential to be developed as one use, which could be a non -competing or some other commercial use. The same parcels are also counted as competing supply when a commercial needs analysis is performed for another commercial use. Essentially, they are double counted in both analyses when they will actually be developed as the market demand dictates. A general economic principal states that all markets are efficient and that supply for the most part is generated as demand dictates. It is a rare situation where supply generates demand. The allocation ratio measures the amount of additional acreage required in relation to the directly utilized acreage to assure proper market functioning in the sale, usage and allocation of land. The additional acreage is required in order to maintain market level pricing and to account for the likelihood that certain lands will not be placed on the market for sale during the forecast horizon or may be subject to future environmental or other constraints. Thus, the lands allocated in the FLUM should be considerably greater than those that will actually be used or developed. Again, basic economic principals have shown that markets are efficient in terms of supply and demand and the ultimate lack of available commercial choices creates an impediment to the market functioning properly. One must also consider that not all of the office/commercial designation in the future land use map will be developed as such since the owners of those properties will only develop the land with uses that respond to market demand. Packet Pg. 131 9.A.1.c The increased acres will maintain flexibility within the comprehensive plan, keep prices reasonable by not constraining land supply, and compensate for lands which may be unavailable for sale or subject to environmental or other development constraints. Growth management practices have suggested that the greater the time horizon of the comprehensive plan, the greater the allocation ratio needed to maintain flexibility of the comprehensive plan. Other factors that influence the residential acreage allocation ratio are the nature and speed of the developing area and the area's general exposure to growth trends in the market. The Consultant believes that to ensure proper flexibility in the comprehensive plan of a rapidly growing county like Collier, a commercial allocation ratio in the range of 1.25 to 1.5 is necessary to maintain planning flexibility and to account for the double counting of land uses. History has shown that the former Florida Department of Community Affairs ("DCA") (Currently the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity) ("DEO") recommended an allocation ratio of 1.25 in the horizon year of a comprehensive plan yet it had seen and approved allocation ratios in the 1.8 to 2.4 range and in some cases even larger allocation ratios for longer forecast horizons. Otherwise, if allocation ratios are not used in the analysis, then an appropriate breakdown of the potential lands between the various land use types needs to be undertaken in order to more accurately analyze the need for a comprehensive land use change. The County utilizes an allocation ratio of 1.15 as their allocation ratio value at the horizon year when determining how a project will impact the market area. The Market Area's allocation ratio is 1.13 in the 2030 horizon year which falls under the County's accepted maximum 1.15 horizon year allocation ratio. 3.4 CONCLUSIONS The Consultant used all of the data and analysis in the previous sections to determine the total supply and demand for commercial space in the Subject Property's market area from 2020 through 2045. The results show that the addition of the Subject Property to the Collier County commercial inventory will not adversely affect the balance of commercial supply in the 10-minute drive time area. The Allocation Ratio is 1.13 in the Collier County Comprehensive Plan 2030 horizon year with the addition of the Subject Property and falls under the recommended 1.15 allocation ratio used by the County to measure comprehensive plan changes. Packet Pg. 132 9.A.1.c 4.0 Fuel Station/Convenience Store Analysis 4.1 Fuel Station/Convenience Store Background As a part of the small-scale Growth Management Plan Amendment to expand and modify the Subdistrict, the Applicant is proposing developing a convenience store/fuel station ("Project") comprised of 6 MPDs (12 fueling positions) and an approximately 6,000 square -foot convenience store. 4.2 Fuel Station/Convenience Store Demographics 4.3 Market Area Definition Since the convenience store/fuel station market is being analyzed, it is appropriate to define the market area for such use by using a drive time calculation. Drive times are calculated by Environmental Systems Research Institute ("ESRI"). The ESRI Business Analyst mapping program is geographic information system -based ("GIS") that calculates market area drive times by actual street networks and posted speed limits and allows for the extraction of census data from that drive time market area. A March 1, 2017 study by the National Association of Convenience Stores ("NACS") on how consumers behave at the pump (See Appendix B, Page 40) shows that consumers are attracted to convenience store/fuel station facilities based on a number of factors including: • Price • Location Convenience • Brand • Ease of ingress/egress As most consumers of a convenience store/fuel station facility are drawn to that facility based primarily on the four factors noted above, it would stand to reason that an immediate market area would include driving within 5-minutes to such a facility to obtain fuel. Most consumers would be fueling as a secondary action while driving for other reasons such as going to the grocery store or traveling to and from work. The above factors indicate that a convenience store/fuel facility market analysis would encompass a 5-minute drive time market area ("Market Area"). Packet Pg. 133 9.A.1.c Figure 4.3.1 below depicts the Market Area for the Project. Figure 4.3.1 Source: ESRI ArcGIS Business Analyst Mapping System The Market Area configuration will change over time as growth occurs in the area and new roads with new residences are developed. That is important to note when the Market Area demographic detail is reviewed over the next five years in the next section. 4.4 Market Area Demographic Detail In order to determine the convenience store/fuel station facility demand, a demographic profile of the Market Area is required. The Consultant utilized the Environmental Systems Research Institute's ("ESRI") geographic information systems ("GIS") both desktop and web -based. ESRI's Business Analyst on-line and ArcGIS desktop programs allow for the most current data collecting at the local level. Table 4.4.1 on the next page shows the census -based demographic profile of the population that lives within the Market Area of the subject site. Packet Pg. 134 9.A.1.c Table 4.4.1 ljaNil esri- Demographic and Inc. _ Profile AIS 5-minute Drive Time Polygon Area: 4.22 square miles Prepared by Esri Summary Census 2010 2021 2026 Population 4,626 6,490 7,277 Households 2,295 3,200 3,601 Families 1,568 2,145 2,401 Average Household Size 1.96 1.98 1.97 Owner Occupied Housing Units 1,779 2,640 2,835 Renter Occupied Housing Units 516 560 766 Median Age 55.1 58.1 59.3 Trends: 2021-2026 Annual Rate Area State National Population 2.32 % 1.31% 0.71% Households 2.39 % 127% 0.71°% Families 2.281 1.2 % 0.64% Owner HHs 1.44% 1.45% 0.91% Median Household Income 1-81 % 2.38% 2.41% 2021 2026 Households by Income Number Percent Number Percent <$15,000 189 5.9% 165 4.6% $15,000 - $24,999 118 3.7% 98 2.7% $25,000 - $34,999 171 5.3% 150 4.2% $35,000 - $40,999 307 9.6% 285 7.9% $50,000 - $74,999 407 12.7% 435 12.11k $75,000 - $99,999 366 11.4 % 460 12.8% $100,000 - $149,999 569 17.81A 645 17.91/a $150,000 - $199,999 400 12.5°/ 499 13.91% $200,000+ 672 21.0% 864 24.0% Median Household Income $102,469 $112,092 Average Household Income $144,400 $163,241 Per Capita Income $66,661 $75,607 Census 2010 2021 2026 Population by Age Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent 0 - 4 189 4,1% 232 3-6% 254 3.51/a 5 - 9 217 4.7°% 248 3.8% 281 3.9°% 10 - 14 209 4.5 % 278 4.31/b 300 4.1% 15 - 19 188 4.1% 290 4.5% 291 4.0% 20 - 24 154 3.3% 226 3.5% 255 3.5% 25 - 34 348 7.5 % 454 7.0% 507 7.0% 35 - 44 454 9.8% 562 8.71A 624 8.6% 45 - 54 548 71,8% 685 10-61k 719 9,91/n 55 - 64 800 17, 3 % 962 14.8 % 1,029 14.1 % 65 - 74 943 20.4°% 1,263 19.5% 1,391 19.1% 75 - 84 447 9,7% 1,002 15A k 1,217 16.79/a 85+ 128 2.8% 282 4.4% 409 5.6% Census 2010 2021 2026 Race and Ethnicity Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent White Alone 4,342 93.9% 5,C04 92.51/a 6,564 91.6% Black Alone 95 2.1 % 138 2.11/ 170 2.3% American Indian Alone 4 0.1 % 6 0.1 % 7 0.1% Asian Alone 59 1.3 % 119 1.8 % 151 2.2 % Pacific Islander Alone 4 0.1 % 6 0.11% 7 0.1 % Some Other Race Alone fib 1.5% 121 1.9% 151 2.11/o Two or More Races 54 1.2% 96 1.5% 116 1.6°% Hispanic Origin (Any Race) 369 12.3% 997 15.40/n 1,265 17.4% Data Note: income is expressed in --nt dollars. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1. Esri Forecasts for 2021 and 2026. Source: ESRI and U.S. Census Bureau In 2021, the population for the Market Area is 6,490 and the number of households is 3,200. The majority of household incomes range from $50,000 to over $200,000 and the median household income of the Market Area is $102,469. The average household income for this market area is $144,400. Packet Pg. 135 9.A.1.c Table 4.2.2 below shows the workforce makeup of the Market Area. The workforce makes up 37.89% of the total market area population and will be significant contributors to the product and fuel sales of the convenience store/fuel station. The majority of the workforce is in the services industry and is white collar in occupation. Table 4.4.2 gpesri-- - • - AIS 5-minute Drive Time Polygon Area: 4.22 square miles 2021 Employed Population 16+ by Industry Total Agriculture/Mining Construction Manufacturing Wholesale Trade Retail Trade Transportation/Utilities Information Finance/Insurance/Real Estate Services Public Administration 2021 Employed Population 16+ by Occupation Total White Collar Management/Business/Financial Professional Sales Administrative Support Services Blue Collar Farming/Forestry/Fishing Can struct is n/Extraction Installation/Maintenance/Repair Production Transportation/Material Moving Prepared by Esri Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File I Esri forecasts for 2021 and 2026 Esn converted Census 2000 data into 201U geography, Source: ESRI and U.S. Census Bureau 5 Minutes 2,458 2.0% 5.7% 4.4% 1.6 % 6,6% 6.7% 0.1% 12.8% 57.0% 2.2 % 2,457 76.2% 30.3% 25.6% 9.6% 10.7% 12.7% 1.5 % 2.4°/ 2.1% 0.7% 5.9% Packet Pg. 136 9.A.1.c 4.5 MARKET ANALYSIS 4.6 Market Area Demand The Consultant next determined the market area demand for gasoline in 2021 and then over a 5-year period to 2026 in order to calculate the future demand for gasoline coming from the Market Area. Table 4.6.1 shows that the market area's 2021 population is 6,490 and the households total 3,200 per ESRI. The household count is required since the annual amount spent on fuel in the Market Area is calculated on a per household basis. Table 4.6.1 Population 6,490 Households 3,200 Source: ESRI and U.S. Census Bureau In order to determine the 2026 population for the same Market Area, the Consultant then utilized the population projection from Table 4.4.1. The table and its forecasts are based on census data. Table 4.6.2 below shows that the Market Area population is projected to increase by 1,882 people between 2021 and 2026. Table 4.6.2 Year 5-Minute Drive Time Population 2021 6,490 2026 7,277 Increase: 787 Source: ESRI and US Census Bureau The next step in calculating the demand for gasoline from the Market Area is to determine the number of gallons of fuel consumed annually in the Market Area. The Consultant utilized the U.S. Census population data for the Market Area and combined it with the U.S. Census automotive expenditures data (Appendix C, Page 43) and the Market Area average price to calculate the Market Area's annual consumption of gasoline. Table 4.6.3 on the next page shows the calculation. The Consultant made the same calculation for both 2021 and 2026. Packet Pg. 137 9.A.1.c Table 4.6.3 2021 2026 Population 6,490 7,277 Households 3,200 3,601 Average Amount spent on gas per Household $3,403.40 $3,403.40 Total Amount Spent in market area $10,890,880.00 $12,255,643.40 Average gasoline price per gallon (from Appendix D, Page 43): $4.10 $4.10 Gallons Consumed Annually in Market Area: 2,656,312 2,989,181 Demand Increase from 2019 to 2024: 12.53% Source: ESRI, Automotive Aftermarket Expenditures, Consultant Field Study The annual gallons of fuel consumed in the market area will increase by 332,869 which equates to a Market Area demand increase of 12.53% over the five-year period. 4.7 Market Area Supply In order to determine the impact the Project will have on the supply, the Consultant first needs to identify the existing gas stations in the Market Area, then calculate the number of cars using the existing gas stations on a weekly basis and finally determine the number of cars that would be using the Project's fuel to ascertain the percent growth the Project's supply will have on the total Market Area supply. The Consultant first used the same Market Area drive time to determine the number of competitive gas stations located within the boundaries of the Market Area. Figure 4.7.1 on the next page shows the competitive gas stations in light blue as they geographically relate to the Project location (red star). (Rest of Page Left Intentionally Blank) Packet Pg. 138 9.A.1.c Figure 4.7.1 Source: ESRI, Collier County Property Appraiser, DOR List with Consultant Field Study (Appendix D, Page 45) There are 4 gas stations within the Market Area boundary and three are convenience store/fuel stations and one is a Sam's Club. The list of the competitive stations, their makeup and photos are located in Appendix D, Page 45. The Consultant then utilized NACS data to examine the supply side of the competition in the Market Area. The NACS 2015 Fuel Report (Appendix E, Page 51) points out that big box mass merchandise stores sell 278,000 gallons of gasoline per month and that amount is more than half of the amount sold by convenience store/fuel station locations. Based on that statistic, the Consultant used 270,000 gallons as a base amount and used 50% (135,000) of that amount as the average amount of gallons sold per month at a convenience store/fuel station location. There was no state, regional or local data available. From that point, the Consultant calculated the four -station Market Area gallons sold during the weekday for a week. Table 4.7.1 on the next page shows that calculation. Packet Pg. 139 9.A.1.c Table 4.7.1 Station Gallons per Month: 135,000 Station Gallons per week: 33,750 Station Gallons for 5 weekdays: 24,107 Stations: 4 Market Area Gallons per 5-day week: 96,429 Source: NACS 2015 Fuel Report (Appendix E, Page 51) The Project's contribution in terms of total supply is then added to the Market Area total so that the number of cars per 5-day week could be determined. Table 4.7.2 below shows that calculation. Table 4.7.2 Market Area Gallons per 5-day week: 96,429 Project Contribution per 5-day week: 24,107 Market Area Gallons per 5-day week with Project: 120,536 Source: Consultant The next step is to calculate the number of gallons per week that is consumed per car in the marketplace. A cars per household statistic is required for this calculation. The Consultant utilized a study by Governing, a highly regarded media platform covering politics, policy and management for state and local government leaders (Appendix F, Page 54). Each car uses 8.97 gallons per week in the Market Area. This calculation is shown in Table 4.7.3 below. Table 4.7.3 Drive Time Population 6,490 Drive Time Households 3,200 Annual Fuel Cost per Household (Appendix B, Page 40) $3,403.40 Cars Per Household (Appendix F, Page 54) 1.78 Annual Fuel Cost per Car $1 912.02 Avg. Market Area Price per Gallon (Appendix D, Page 45) $4.10 Annual Gallons Consumed per Car 466.35 Weeks per Year 52 Gallons Per Car Per Week 8.97 Source: ESRI, Automotive Aftermarket Expenditures, Consultant Field Study, Governing Packet Pg. 140 9.A.1.c The next calculation is to convert the gallons per 5-day week to cars purchasing those gallons in the Market Area in order to compare to the cars per 5-day week as calculated by the Project traffic study that will purchase fuel at the Project. Table 4.7.4 shows that calculation. Table 4.7.4 Market Area Gallons per 5-day week with Project (from Table 2.2.2): 313,393 Gallons per car per week (from Table 2.2.3): 8.97 Cars per 5-day week in Market Area: 34,945 Source: Consultant The number of cars per 5-day week for the Project is the next calculation needed to compare the Project's contribution to the supply. Using the Project's traffic study (Appendix G, Page 58) and a study performed by C-Store Shopper Insights (Appendix H, Page 60), the Consultant determined that 2,567 cars will be purchasing gasoline at the Project's fuel stations over a 5-weekday period. Table 4.7.5 below shows that calculation. Table 4.7.5 Cars buying Gasoline at the Project during 5-Weekday period Weekday Per hour am (4 hours) Weekday Per hour pm (4 hours) Total Cars in per weekday: C-Store data: 69% cars in for gas Project cars buying gas over 5-weekdays: Per hour Total Cars in 170 680 164 656 1,336 69.00% 922 Source: Project Traffic Study. C-Store Shopper Insights 4,609 The Project's percentage of contribution to the Market Area supply is the last calculation. Table 4.7.6 below shows that the Project will contribute 2,567 fuel purchasers to the Market Area, equating to a Market Area supply increase of 13.19% Table 4.7.6 Market Area cars per 5-weekdays including Project (from Table 2.2.4): 34,945 Project cars per 5-weekdays (from Table 2.2.5): 4,609 Project Supply percent increase to the Market Area Supply: 13.19% Source: Consultant Packet Pg. 141 9.A.1.c 4.8 Supply — Demand Analysis The final step in the Market Study supply -demand analysis is to put the supply and demand calculations together in order to determine the oversupply or undersupply of gasoline in the Market Area with the addition of the Project. Table 4.8.1 below shows that over the next five years there will be a 0.66% surplus supply of gasoline to serve the Market Area over the next five (5) years with the addition of the Project. A basic economic principal states that all markets are efficient and that supply is for the most part generated as demand dictates. It is a rare economic situation where supply generates demand. This basic economic principal shows that markets are efficient in terms of supply and demand and the ultimate lack of available fuel station choices creates an impediment to the market functioning properly. The economic principal stated above would indicate that fuel station supply will be added to the Market Area in order to equalize the demand side of the Market Area's supply/demand equation. The Project will increase the Market Area's supply side by 13.19% thus stabilizing the Market Area's supply/demand equation for the next five (5) years. There will still be a 0.66% supply surplus in the next five (5) years even with the Project addition to the supply. Table 4.8.1 Market Area Demand Growth (Table 2.1.3) 12.53% Project percent of market (Table 2.2.6) 13.19% Market Area 5-year supply = surplus/(deficit) 0.66% Source: Consultant (Rest of Page Left Intentionally Blank) Packet Pg. 142 9.A.1.c 4.9 CONCLUSIONS 4.10 The Consultant used all of the data and analysis in the previous sections to determine the total supply and demand for gasoline sales in the Project's market area for the next five years. From there, the Consultant then determined the Project's impact on the Market Area in terms of the Market Area's percent of demand growth versus the Market Area's percent of supply increase with the addition of the Project's supply. The results show that the addition of the Project to the Market Area will not adversely affect the balance of gasoline supply while addressing the demand coming from the future growth. The Market Area is currently assumed to be in equilibrium as economic studies have shown that markets are efficient in terms of supply and demand and the future supply will be developed as the market grows and diversifies. The Project will support the demand coming to the Market Area over the next five years without constraining the existing supply. (Rest of Page Left Intentionally Blank) Packet Pg. 143 9.A.1.c 5.0 Self -Storage Analysis 5.1 Self -Storage Background As a part of the small-scale Growth Management Plan Amendment to expand and modify the Subdistrict, the Applicant is also proposing the development of a 100,000 square foot in -door self -storage facility (C-5 Zoning). 5.2 Self -Storage Industry Market Dynamics The Self -Storage Industry continues to grow across the nation and particularly in the sunbelt states, which have seen exponential growth over and above the consistent growth they've enjoyed for the past few decades. The exponential growth has been fueled by the Covid-19 Pandemic that generated a population migration from northern states to the sunbelt states. Currently, 9.4% of U.S. households rent a storage unit, and many think that number is poised to grow due to two of the largest cohorts in the population — the Baby Boomers and the Millennials. The Baby Boomers are moving into their retirement years. As Boomers downsize and move to warmer climates, many items will need to be stored. A lifetime of accumulated possessions can be difficult to part with and even with diligent pruning, is often difficult to condense into a two -bedroom home or apartment. Another driving force behind self -storage is the Millennial population that are coming of age, buying homes, starting families, and contributing to the demographic migration to the southeast and suburbs. During the pandemic, virtual work arrangements allowed many Millennials to move south for lifestyle and tax benefits. The Millennials and Baby Boomers represent a huge opportunity as they are moving and looking for ways to live affordably yet comfortably. Self -storage is providing the missing puzzle piece. Why Are Storage Units So Hot in Southwest Florida? In a story that appeared in the Naples Daily News two years ago (Appendix I, Page 62), data collected by Maxwell, Hendry & Simmons, LLC, a Southwest Florida real estate appraisal firm, noted that Collier County has approximately 9.02 square feet of storage space per person, which exceeds the national average of about 6.5 square feet of storage space per person. Packet Pg. 144 9.A.1.c Gerald Hendry, a state -certified real estate appraiser with the firm, pointed out that unlike other areas of the country, Southwest Florida doesn't have basements or other areas to store items that have been accumulated over the years. He also said that other storage components such as open storage for boats and RVs are in high demand as most of the communities that have been developed over the past few decades in Southwest Florida are deed restricted with no options for this type of storage. Mr. Hendry pointed out that the popularity of self -storage facilities has paralleled the dramatic growth of rental apartment complexes in Lee and Collier Counties. He said that those units are small with limited storage thus many renters are opting to have a storage unit to store their extraneous items until such time they move into a larger living area. In a related self -storage story (Appendix J, Page 69), Matt Price, CEO of Seagate Development points out that self -storage will always be gif in Florida because of the lack of basements and the extra storage space in an attic is too hot. He also said that there are a lot of people here and there is not a lot of places to put stuff. 5.3 POPULATION GROWTH National Movement Trend According to the State of Florida's Office of Economic and Demographic Research ("OEDR"), an estimated 329,717 new residents settled in Florida between April 2020 and April 2021. According to the National Association of Realtors, a total of 8.9 million people changed address since the start of the pandemic. The Association reports that close to 28% of the people relocating to Florida came from Texas and another 15% relocated from New York, with a little over 6% coming from California. Florida's popularity isn't expected to end any time soon. The state is expected to gain an average 845 new residents a day until 2025, according to ODER (Appendix K, Page 73). That is analogous to approximately the City of Orlando's population every year. This continued state growth will positively impact Collier County's future population growth. Collier County Growth The University of Florida's Bureau of Economic and Business Research's ("BEBR") medium forecast for Collier County's population is expected to grow by just over 1.5% annually for the next five (5) years. The County has surpassed that growth percent during the Covid 19 Pandemic over the past two (2) years as many people from northern states took the opportunity to move to tax friendly Florida as they worked from home and the baby boomer generation jumped at the same opportunity to retire early and make the same move. Table 5.3.1 on the next page shows BEBR's forecasted medium growth for the next five (5) years in Collier County. Packet Pg. 145 9.A.1.c Table 5.3.1. BEBR's Medium Population Growth Forecast for Collier County Year Population % Increase 2021 382,680 2022 389,060 1.67% 2023 395,440 1.64% 2024 401,820 1.61 % 2025 408,200 1.59% 2026 413,340 1.26% Source: University of Florida's Bureau of Economic and Business Research 2021 Population Forecast As noted in the previous Self -Storage Industry Dynamics section of this report, people moving to Florida tend to utilize self -storage facilities at a greater pace due to the lack of storage spaces like basements in their Florida residence and their purchase of smaller sized residential units due to higher residential prices compared to northern homes. Collier County In -Bound Movement Trend The Internal Revenue Service produces statistics on a county level that shows the in -bound and out -bound movements on an annual basis based on tax return address changes. Table 5.3.2 below shows the top 10 destinations sending residents to Collier County. Table 5.3.2. Top 10 Locations sending In -Bound Residents to Collier County County In -Migration Lee County 1,760 Miami -Dade County 619 Broward County 373 Cook County — Chicago, IL 277 Palm Beach County 213 Orange County 151 Hillsborough County 145 Suffolk County — Long Island, NY 132 Fairfield County — Danbury, CT 125 DuPage County — West Chicago, IL 112 Source: United States Internal Revenue Service (2019) Packet Pg. 146 9.A.1.c The Top 10 locations are sending almost 4,000 residents annually to Collier County. Of the top 10, six (6) counties are located in Florida and they are sending nearly 3,300 residents that account for 83.5% of the top 10 in -migration. Of the counties located in Florida, Lee County (adjacent to Collier County) accounts for 1,760 or 45% of the top 10 total. The County's projected population growth and in -migration analysis along with the development of smaller residential units strongly supports the need for additional Self -Storage services in Collier County. 5.4 SELF -STORAGE MARKET DEMAND PER CAPITA North Naples Planning Community Market Area The Subject Property is located in the North Naples Planning Community ("NNPC"). In order to capture a current market demand for the Subject Property's proposed use, the NNPC is the most logical area for the demand determination as it is one (1) of the 12 planning areas used by the County to plan for growth in the County. The NNPC is located in the northwestern area of the County as is shown in Figure 5.4.1 below. Figure 5.4.1 — Collier County Urban Estates Planning Community Source: ESRI ARCgis Mapping System and Consultant Packet Pg. 147 9.A.1.c As noted earlier, the Subject Property is located withing the NNPC. Figure 5.4.2 below shows the location of the Subject Property within the NNPC. Also shown in Figure 5.4.2 are 12 locations of existing and proposed self -storage facilities within the NNPC. The locations relate to the supply of facilities in Table 5.4.1 on the next page. The nearest self -storage facility to the Subject Site in driving distance is approximately four (4) miles Figure 5.4.2 — Subject Property Location in North Naples Planning Community ,I "N 113 -ft L:�T"�:-a r[r r Source: ESRI ARCgis Mapping System and Consultant Packet Pg. 148 9.A.1.c Table 5.4.1. Existing Self -Storage Facilities in the NNPA Map ID Facility Address Square Feet Units Year Built 1 The Lock Up Self Storage 1025 Piper Boulevard 80,883 703 - 2 Extra Space Storage 10550 Goodlette-Frank Rd. 115,824 1,007 2001 3 Extra Space Storage 14600 Old 41 N 36,684 318 1986 4 Midgard Self Storage 15600 Old 41 N 78,438 682 1998 5 Public Storage 15800 Old 41 N 52,842 459 1988 6 Ace Super Storage 16300 Old 41 N 4,828 41 1986 7 CubeSmart Self Storage 2349 Trade Center Way 44,435 386 1990 8 Storage Sense 5800 Houchin St. 39,736 345 1979 9 CubeSmart Self Storage 5650 Naples Blvd. 70,554 613 1985 10 Hide -Away Storage 1597 Pine Ridge Rd. 100,368 872 1986 11 Pine Ridge Mini Storage 5307 Shirley St. 4,146 36 1967 12 Cain -Jones Self Storage 6166 Shirley St. 68,624 596 1983 Total NNPC Self -Storage Square Feet 697,362 Source: Collier County Property Appraiser, Collier Comprehensive Planning and Consultant The Consultant used the 2021 population for the NNPC from the Collier County Zoning Division's growth estimates table. The total NNPA 2021 population is 59,663. The Collier County Zoning Division's growth estimates table is located in Appendix L, Page 75. By dividing the total NNPC existing and proposed self -storage square feet by the 2021 NNPC population, the demand of 11.69 square feet of self -storage per capita as shown in Table 5.4.2 below. Table 5.4.2. Per Capita Self -Storage Square Feet in NNPC Total NNPC Self -Storage Square Feet 697,362 North Naples Planning Community Population 59,663 UEPC SF Storage Demand per Capita 11.69 Source: Collier County Property Appraiser, Collier County Zoning Division and Consultant 5.5 North Naples Planning Community Market Area Supply/Demand Analysis To establish the demand for self -storage square feet in the North Naples Planning Community, the population growth is calculated. Collier County is forecasted to grow by just over 7% for the next five years and then by just under 7% between 2025 and 2030. Table 5.5.1 on the next page shows the County's population growth going forward. Packet Pg. 149 9.A.1.c Table 5.5.1. Collier County Forecasted Population Growth Countywide Total Population Growth 2015 2020 2025 2030 Permanent Population Estimates and Forecasts 347,002 390,937 426,443 455,246 5-year Percent Increase 12.66% 9.08% 6.75% Source: Collier County Zoning Division, June 19, 2021 Using the growth percentages from Table 5.1.1 above, the Consultant used the 2020 population for the NNPC from the Collier County Zoning Division's growth estimates table (Appendix L, Page 75) and applied the five (5) year growth estimate percentages to estimate the future population for years 2025, 2030 and 2035 as shown in Table 5.5.2 below. Table 5.5.2. NNPC Forecasted Population Growth Year 2020 2025 2030 2035 Collier County GMD Population Forecast 390,937 426,443 455,246 498,491 Collier County Percent Population Growth 15.26% 9.08% 6.75% 6.75% North Naples Planning Area Census Population 59,663 65,082 69,478 74,170 Source: Collier County Zoning Division and Consultant To determine the future demand for self -storage square feet in the NNPC market area, the five (5) and 10-year population growth is multiplied by the NNPC's square feet demand per capita of 11.69 square feet as determined in Table 5.4.2. The base year 2020 assumes that the self -storage supply is in equilibrium with the NNPC demand. Table 5.5.3 below shows that the NNPC market will have a demand of almost 115,000 square feet of self -storage space in the horizon year of 2030. Table 5.5.3. NNPC Forecasted Population Growth 2020 2025 2030 NNPC Population 59,663 65,082 69,478 NNPC Base Population 59,663 59,663 59,663 Increase/(Decrease) 0 5,419 9,815 N N PC Sq. Ft. Demand per Capita 11.69 11.69 11.69 0 63,336 114,716 Source: Collier County Zoning Division and Consultant Packet Pg. 150 9.A.1.c The final calculation in the self -storage supply/demand analysis is to show the effect that the Applicant's proposed 100,000 square feet of self -storage space would have on the NNPC self -storage market. Table 5.5.4 below indicates that the NNPC self -storage market will have a deficit of almost 115,000 square feet of self -storage space in the horizon year of 2030. Table 5.5.4. NNPC Forecasted Self -Storage Need in 2030 2020 2025 2030 North Naples Planning Community Square Feet Demand 697,362 760,698 812,078 North Naples Planning Community Square Feet Supply 697,362 697,362 697,362 North Naples Planning Community Surplus/(Deficit) 0 (63,336) (114,716) Source: Collier County Property Appraiser, Collier County Zoning Division and Consultant The last analysis is to determine the Applicant's proposed self -storage square feet would have on the future NNPC self -storage market. Table 5.5.5 below shows that if the Applicant's 100,000 square feet of self -storage space would bring the NNPC self -storage market back into equilibrium. Table 5.5.5. NNPC Forecasted Self -Storage Need in 2030 2020 2025 2030 North Naples Planning Community Square Feet Demand 697,362 760,698 812,078 North Naples Planning Community Square Feet Supply w/P 697,362 797,362 797,362 North Naples Planning Community Surplus/(Deficit) 0 36,664 (14,716) Source: Collier County Property Appraiser, Collier County Zoning Division, and Consultant 5.6 SELF -STORAGE SERVICES CONCLUSION The previous data and analysis support the need for the proposed 100,000 square feet of self -storage use on the Subject Property. The addition of the Subject Property's 100,000 square feet of self -storage use still shows a deficit of almost 15,000 square feet of NNPC Market Area self -storage use in the 2030 horizon year. The Market Area is currently efficient in terms of supply and demand but with the supply remaining steady and no self -storage applications are in the pipeline for the NNPC Market Area. Economic studies have shown that markets tend to move toward efficiency in terms of supply and demand and future supply is developed as the market grows and diversifies thus creating a demand. Based on the analysis, there is need for self -storage services in the Market Area over the next 10 years to accommodate the Market Area's growth over that same time period. Packet Pg. 151 9.A.1.c The vacant parcels that have the potential to be developed for self -storage use and the map that highlights their location are located in Appendix M on Page 77. The Consultant has requested and paid for data from the County that would indicate the zoning on all vacant properties in the County but have not received the data as of the date of this report. (Rest of Page Left Intentionally Blank) Packet Pg. 152 9.A.1.c APPENDIX A L M m O m •L O Cu L \(D NNO I.L O J LO N N M O O O N N O N J d M LO O ti N N C O 2 d Q' Q 3 Y V Cu m U d U U r c R .Q a Co a Packet Pg. 153 9.A.1.c Appendix Table A - 10-Minute Drive Time Developed Competing Commercial Parcels FID ACRES_GIS 0_NAME1 SQFT_HTD LUSE_D 7072 0.34 LAKE MICHIGAN CREDIT UNION 372 Financial Institution 31570 0.87 DOANE LTD PARTNERSHIP 4,128 Financial Institution 69704 1.16 AMSOUTH BANK 3,069 Financial Institution 77475 1.16 RES FLORIDA 1255 HOLDINGS LLC 8,853 Financial Institution 85898 1.26 FLORIDA COMMUNITY BANK 8,106 Financial Institution 85905 1.45 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK NATL ASSN 4,223 Financial Institution 137081 0.90 LAKE MICHIGAN CREDIT UNION 5,218 Financial Institution 172224 0.96 JP MORGAN CHASE BANK N A 4,230 Financial Institution 172722 0.79 WACHOVIA BANK 3,848 Financial Institution 176417 1.24 WACHOVIA BANK 3,106 Financial Institution 176751 1.30 SUNTRUST BANK SW FL 4,297 Financial Institution 176775 1.19 REGIONS BANK 3,001 Financial Institution 176776 1.39 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK N A 5,494 Financial Institution 180688 1.03 13555 TTN LLC 4,011 Financial Institution 183372 1.23 WACHOVIA BANK 4,630 Financial Institution 183380 1.27 BARNETT BANK N A 3,840 Financial Institution 183381 1.27 FIFTH THIRD BANK OF FLORIDA 3,300 Financial Institution 184945 0.80 COMMUNITY BANK OF NAPLES 3,436 Financial Institution 190336 1.25 ATLANTIC STATES BANK 5,187 Financial Institution 190338 1.49 SUNCOAST CREDIT UNION 4,024 Financial Institution 190341 1.12 BARNETT TECHNOLOGIES INC 5,543 Financial Institution 200704 1.63 SUNCOAST CREDIT UNION 4,518 Financial Institution 9624 0.75 DOANE LTD PARTNERSHIP 2,790 Drive Thru Restaurant 69706 1.06 AGREE LTD 2,810 Drive Thru Restaurant 137082 0.86 COLOMBO ENTERPRISES INC 2,322 Drive Thru Restaurant 137083 1.20 SIXTH PLACE SANDS LLC 2,953 Drive Thru Restaurant 174676 0.60 DUBSDREAD CONT & DEV CORP 0 Drive Thru Restaurant 183379 1.27 SCHMIDT INVESTMENTS LP 4,040 Drive Thru Restaurant 9178 1.24 OCEAN BOULEVARD PARTNERSHIP 5,072 Restaurant 31571 2.05 NAPLES CHW LLC 12,143 Restaurant 31722 0.30 OCEAN BOULEVARD PARTNERSHIP 6,564 Restaurant 32335 0.28 GRACE-KELLY LLC 1,168 Restaurant 69705 1.80 CH NFL LLC 6,225 Restaurant 172343 0.34 BEACHCLIFF EXECUTIVE CENTRE 3,868 Restaurant 177657 0.69 2570 NAPLES REALTY LLC 5,307 Restaurant 190342 1.05 JAMSOL LLC 6,332 Restaurant 33281 1.50 CWS AT NAPLES INC 0 Professional Building 74943 0.25 LJZ PROPERTIES LTD 3,748 Professional Building 190333 0.89 MPO PROPERTIES CROSSPOINTE LLC 5,703 Professional Building 197025 1.12 NATIONWIDE HLTH PROPERTIES INC 8,497 Professional Building 31701 3.72 TJSS LLC 18,984 Multi -Story Office 77479 7.86 RES FLORIDA 1250 HOLDINGS LLC 315,490 Multi -Story Office 77488 2.34 RES FLORIDA 1284 HOLDING LLC 0 Multi -Story Office 77489 5.17 RES FLORIDA 1265 HOLDINGS, LLC 55,440 Multi -Story Office 172225 0.31 SBP HOLDINGS LLC 4,952 Multi -Story Office 172311 0.31 KOKO PROPERTIES LLC 1,856 Multi -Story Office 174370 0.87 MIND INVESTMENTS OF FLA LLC 4,606 Multi -Story Office 174677 0.60 BROWN & NELSON LLC 4,108 Multi -Story Office 174831 0.31 NAPLES DENTAL SPECIALISTS LLC 2,895 Multi -Story Office 177818 1.09 KLINGLER PROPERTIES NC LLC 9,937 Multi -Story Office 177819 1.80 KLINGLER PROPERTIES NC LLC 9,937 Multi -Story Office 177898 1.29 NAPLES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL INC 7,383 Multi -Story Office 177899 0.87 JG PROPERTIES OF NAPLES LLC 4,198 Multi -Story Office 186187 0.88 NEW SOLUTIONS LTD 5,096 Multi -Story Office Packet Pg. 154 9.A.1.c FID ACRES_GIS 0_NAME1 SQFT_HTD LUSE_D 186193 1.02 EL KOMATI LLC 5,674 Multi -Story Office 198065 1.01 NICKENJOHN ENTERPRISES INC 5,493 Multi -Story Office 198069 1.20 NAPOLI PROPERTY HOLDING CO LLC 8,252 Multi -Story Office 487 0.16 COLLIER COUNTY EDUCATION 5,960 One Story Office 31528 0.94 PHELAN PROPERTIES-WALKERBILT 12,108 One Story Office 31580 1.00 OFFICE CENTER OF NORTH 11,017 One Story Office 31583 0.93 DOANE LTD PARTNERSHIP 11,096 One Story Office 33262 0.16 CCK INVESTMENTS LLC 5,940 One Story Office 77278 2.96 LAMVEST888 LLC 26,085 One Story Office 77279 1.31 LAMVEST888 LLC 8,747 One Story Office 77477 1.32 RANI INVESTMENTS LLC 11,303 One Story Office 172273 172281 174403 174800 177651 177654 177658 177796 177801 177900 179215 180490 180511 186185 186194 190334 190339 190340 197021 197023 198062 198063 198064 198066 209347 209351 213224 9374 31454 31556 31713 32426 63495 69696 69699 72532 85904 137084 172344 173693 176779 176780 176782 183373 185761 0.48 NEPHRON INVESTMENST LLC 0.62 ABS OF NAPLES LLC 0.15 870 97TH LLC 0.15 INES OLIVOS REVOCABLE TRUST 0.91 PRIME MEDSPACE LLC 0.46 TEJERINA, GABRIEL A=& BETTY 1.23 2575 NORTHBROOKE LLC 1.90 PRESIDENT ELECTRONICS USA INC 0.96 NARDINI PROPERTIES LLC 1.50 NCHMD INC 1.39 QJR PROPERTIES NAPLES LLC 0.37 12052 TAMIAMI LLC 0.48 SHORES LLC, THE 1.02 GLOBAL DYNAMICS LLC 2.70 UNITED AMERICAN TRUST LC 1.02 MPO PROPERTIES CROSSPOINTE LLC 0.46 1049 CROSSPOINTE LLC 0.45 FIRST FLORIDA INTEGRITY BANK 1.55 MPG HEALTH PARKWAY LLC 1.01 MTVLLLC 0.37 P FAMILY STRAND BLVD LLC 0.49 GILHART IRREV TRUST FOR CHILD 0.66 GILHART IRREV TRUST FOR CHILD 0.53 GILHART IRREV TRUST FOR CHILD 0.16 CCK INVESTMENTS LLC 0.16 CCK INVESTMENTS LLC 0.91 WINTERVIEW CT PROPERTY LLC 3.73 OCEAN BOULEVARD PARTNERSHIP II 1.90 4141 BALDRIDGE LLC 2.56 OCEAN BOULEVARD PARTNERSHIP 27.25 OCEAN BOULEVARD PARTNERSHIP 18.49 IMMOKALEE ROAD ASSOC LLC 0.57 GPG REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS LLC 8.20 BRENTWOOD LAND PARTNERS LLC 14.61 TARGET CORPORATI ON T-2063 7.04 OAKES FARMS INC 29.58 SHOPPES AT VANDERBILT LLC, THE 18.57 COLOMBO ENTERPRISES 0.97 PLAZA PARK CENTER LLC 0.86 EFA NNP LLC 9.88 FL -NA WALK SHOPPING CTR LLC 4.24 FL NA WALK SHOPPING CENTER LLC 8.84 FL -NA WALK SHOPPING CENTER LLC 9.26 SCHMIDT INVESTMENTS LTD PTNSHP 1.10 MK REALTY PRESERVE LLC 4,136 One Story Office 5,365 One Story Office 1,440 One Story Office 1,000 One Story Office 8,530 One Story Office 3,460 One Story Office 12,732 One Story Office 11,670 One Story Office 10,142 One Story Office 12,633 One Story Office 9,596 One Story Office 1,771 One Story Office 4,854 One Story Office 8,562 One Story Office 5,844 One Story Office 11,415 One Story Office 5,183 One Story Office 3,000 One Story Office 12,106 One Story Office 8,042 One Story Office 3,792 One Story Office 6,000 One Story Office 9,000 One Story Office 6,000 One Story Office 5,960 One Story Office 5,960 One Story Office 10,257 One Story Office 33,170 Community Shopping Center 15,300 Community Shopping Center 93,275 Community Shopping Center 155,918 Community Shopping Center 77,160 Community Shopping Center 9,500 Community Shopping Center 84,344 Community Shopping Center 175,337 Community Shopping Center 2,072 Community Shopping Center 212,504 Community Shopping Center 174,365 Community Shopping Center 12,655 Community Shopping Center 9,964 Community Shopping Center 77,805 Community Shopping Center 20,020 Community Shopping Center 20,216 Community Shopping Center 66,267 Community Shopping Center 7,381 Community Shopping Center Packet Pg. 155 9.A.1.c FID ACRES GIS O NAME1 SQFT HTD LUSE D 190343 12.08 KRG RIVERCHASE LLC 78,975 Community Shopping Center 31386 3.80 SW F DEVELOPMENT GROUP LLC 37,690 Mixed Use - Store/Office (with SFR) 31417 3.02 OLD 41 WAREHOUSE LLC 30,030 Mixed Use - Store/Office (with SFR) 31579 1.61 JFN HOLDINGS LLC 18,020 Mixed Use - Store/Office (with SFR) 172238 0.31 EWING TR, WADE B 2,887 Mixed Use - Store/Office (with SFR) 172239 0.63 DOWNTOWN PROPERTY INVEST LLC 8,654 Mixed Use - Store/Office (with SFR) 172240 0.15 SUJEVICH, LINDA LOUISE 3,675 Mixed Use - Store/Office (with SFR) 172279 0.62 MEADOWCREEK OF FL LLC 5,425 Mixed Use - Store/Office (with SFR) 172723 0.46 FONTANA PALM REALTY LLC 4,785 Mixed Use - Store/Office (with SFR) 31505 1.75 BENDERSON TR, RONALD 13,157 Store (One Story) 31732 0.46 OCEAN BOULEVARD PARTNERSHIP 14,852 Store (One Story) 32438 3.56 BLEND -ALL HOTEL DEV INC ETAL 14,308 Store (One Story) 32457 23.75 WAL-MART STORES EAST LP 209,373 Store (One Story) 33265 1.95 EKL PROPERTIES LLC 15,264 Store (One Story) 69707 1.50 CITY MATTRESS OF FL INC 11,465 Store (One Story) 77476 1.51 CREEKSIDE WEST INC 4,464 Store (One Story) 85203 1.43 RI CS2 LLC 2,600 Store (One Story) 85860 1.50 JFN 2375, LLC 11,200 Store (One Story) 172274 0.74 7-ELEVEN INC 2,688 Store (One Story) 172278 0.47 JAMES MICHAEL DILLER REV TR 5,600 Store (One Story) 172280 0.31 MK REALTY 887 105TH AVE LLC 993 Store (One Story) 172312 1.85 ARCO FINANCE INC 19,090 Store (One Story) 174142 0.15 CASTANO, H JAVIER 1,154 Store (One Story) 174337 0.53 KAUTSKY TR, NORMAN E 5,900 Store (One Story) 174338 0.15 JTW LLC 1,800 Store (One Story) 174371 0.36 NINETY SIX 01 LLC 6,975 Store (One Story) 174523 1.24 MURPHY TR, ANNETTA M 12,311 Store (One Story) 177652 0.46 D&D REALTY LLC 5,288 Store (One Story) 177655 1.12 SAMUEL INVESTMENTS LLC 10,875 Store (One Story) 177659 1.51 7-ELEVEN INC 2,930 Store (One Story) 177665 0.67 30 FAYETTE ST LLC 6,148 Store (One Story) 180483 0.40 IMAGINE FLORIDA LLC 5,510 Store (One Story) 183378 1.58 CIRCLE K STORES INC 5,175 Store (One Story) 185760 1.57 CH REALTY VIII 8,534 Store (One Story) 190332 1.06 B-1 PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLLP 10,119 Store (One Story) 198061 0.67 JRGH INVESTMENT LLC 6,355 Store (One Story) 346.45 2,772,505 Average Built Sq. Ft. per Acre: 8,003 Source: Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section Commercial Inventory, Collier County Property Appraiser and ArcGIS Packet Pg. 156 9.A.1.c Appendix Table B - 10-Minute Drive Time Vacant Commercial and Non-Ag Parcels FID ACRES_GIS 0_NAME1 SQFT_HTD LUSE_D 31434 24.52 TRINITY REAL ESTATE TRUST 0 Acreage not zoned agricultural 32443 9.35 WILLIAM C SCHERER TRUST 0 Acreage not zoned agricultural 32444 9.35 JAZ AUTOMOTIVE PROPERTIES LLC 0 Acreage not zoned agricultural 32440 7.46 KASE PUD LLC 0 Acreage not zoned agricultural 32427 4.97 CLEARY JR, RAYMOND J 0 Acreage not zoned agricultural 32428 3.92 CLEARY JR, RAYMOND J 0 Acreage not zoned agricultural 31439 2.57 PERGJINI, FREDERICK J 0 Acreage notzoned agricultural 33282 2.99 VENETIAN PLAZA OFFICE PARK 0 Vacant Commercial 116991 2.62 6750 IMMOKALEE MEDICAL LLC 0 Vacant Commercial 117031 2.60 6750 IMMOKALEE MEDICAL LLC 0 Vacant Commercial 185870 1.90 NORTHBROOKE PROF VILLAGE LLC 0 Vacant Commercial 85913 1.79 MATHENEY TR, A GROVER 0 Vacant Commercial 33299 1.60 VENETIAN PLAZA OFFICE PARK 0 Vacant Commercial 85914 1.59 MATHENEY TR, A GROVER 0 Vacant Commercial 213225 1.58 WINTERVIEW COURT II ASSOC INC 0 Vacant Commercial 117491 1.41 COLOMBO ENTERPRISES 0 Vacant Commercial 186186 1.36 QUAIL PLAZA PROPERTY OWNERS 0 Vacant Commercial 77462 1.24 CREEKSIDE EAST INC 0 Vacant Commercial 77460 1.09 CREEKSIDE EAST INC 0 Vacant Commercial 6470 1.01 A K S SW FLORIDA LLC 0 Vacant Commercial 166297 0.87 LB MEDITERRA LLC 0 Vacant Commercial 31946 0.62 HMC NGL LLC 0 Vacant Commercial 177661 0.60 2570 NAPLES REALTY LLC 0 Vacant Commercial 180478 0.59 GUEST SERVICES CO OF VIRGINIA 0 Vacant Commercial 177920 0.59 PERFORMANCE WAY LLC 0 Vacant Commercial 177912 0.52 PERFORMANCE WAY LLC 0 Vacant Commercial 31943 0.51 HMC NGL LLC 0 Vacant Commercial 177653 0.46 SUMMERTON, SUSAN J 0 Vacant Commercial 31947 0.38 TIBURON GOLF VENTURES PRTNRSHP 0 Vacant Commercial 177656 0.26 2570 NAPLES REALTY LLC 0 Vacant Commercial 174336 0.23 BLACK, ERNEST T 0 Vacant Commercial 198073 0.22 STRAND PROFESSIONAL PRTNS INC 0 Vacant Commercial 209346 0.19 WALDEN OAKS PROFESSIONAL BLDGS 0 Vacant Commercial 209350 0.19 WALDEN OAKS PROFESSIONAL BLDG 0 Vacant Commercial 209349 0.19 WALDEN OAKS PROFESSIONAL BLDG 0 Vacant Commercial 209348 0.19 WALDEN OAKS PROFESSIONAL BLDGS 0 Vacant Commercial 174524 0.16 MURPHY TR, ANNETTA M 0 Vacant Commercial 174144 0.16 SPRINT-FLORIDA INC 0 Vacant Commercial 172241 0.15 BOWEIN, LLOYD L 0 Vacant Commercial 180489 0.15 12052 TAMIAMI LLC 0 Vacant Commercial 174369 0.15 D AGOSTINO, CECELIA M 0 Vacant Commercial 174368 0.15 D AGOSTINO, CECELIA M 0 Vacant Commercial 174145 0.14 UNITED TELEPHONE CO OF FL 0 Vacant Commercial 174799 0.14 NORTH NAPLES SERVICES LLC 0 Vacant Commercial 186190 0.13 NNPS LLC 0 Vacant Commercial 174797 0.11 ROGER J JUSSEAUME FMLY TRUST 0 Vacant Commercial 85205 0.11 WINTERVIEW COURT DEV INC 0 Vacant Commercial 85206 0.10 WINTERVIEW CT LTD 0 Vacant Commercial 186189 0.06 NEW SOLUTIONS LTD 0 Vacant Commercial 177914 0.05 GB MY OTHER PLACE I II LLC 0 Vacant Commercial 93.28 Source: Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section Commercial Inventory, Collier County Property Appraiser and ArcGIS Packet Pg. 157 9.A.1.c APPENDIX B L i �./0 W �L 0 E L r Z 0 c 0 a� c J LO N N M O O O N N O N J d M LO OD ti N N C O A N Q 3 Y V R m U d U U Jn r c Cu v Q a- Gl Co Q Packet Pg. 158 9.A.1.c How Consumers Behave at the Pump I NACS Online - Your 13usiness — ... http://wwwnac&online.comNourBtisinesslFuetsCtnterlRasics/Articics/p,., Ask NACS Gmoennrs Terms or Use Advartise About NAGS Fuels institute Privacy Policy For Suppliers Foundation Related Glossary Copyrig ht 0 21317 NACS Associatlons About Basics Articles Multimedla News Research Ha WS 1 Aniue:a 1 New Coisvmars Behave at Ine Pump HOW CONSUMERS BEHAVE AT THE PUMP Neal+ 40 million Americans Fill up their vehicles every day. How they drive, considergas prices and determine whether they go- inside the store has a profound impact tm convenience stares. By NACS Pub4shed: 3111201/ 10 Tags_ Consumers: Pay at the Pump Nearly 40 million Americana nil up their vehicles every day. How they drive, Consider gas prices and determine whether to shop inside a convenlence store For iood, anarxs and beverages has a profound impact on Re retail channel that galls 66% prate fuel purchased in Ifie United Status. Let's look at some of the broad clharaclariii s of how consumers buy gas and examine how conwenience retanem can keep them coming hack. In particular. we eksminp_ • Consumer behavior at the pump • What retailers can do to change consumer behavior • Overall dnvrng habits NACS has surveyed epnsumers about therr perceptions re]aled to gas prices glop 2007 and has conducted monlhly consumer sentiment surveys since 2013. NAC5 commissioned Penn. Schuah and Berland AssoGates LLC to obndUd 1,114 onii no interviews with adult Americans on January 3.6, 2017. The margin or error for the amim sample Is +I- 2.9u% al the 9.5% conl9wenoo mtervat and higher for subgroups. Below are the queskcris and overall responses Consumer Behavior at the Pump Undwslaading how consumers feel about gasoline prices can help convenienog retailers execute their markeling strategies. its also Important to determine how consumers buy gas, which reveais slims interestng variations. Filling up the Tank Consumers are more likely to Puy gas during the evening rush than lhn morning daypan (361/e vs 22%). Ikely because of homing time pressures. au Rmse time pressures vary by demographic - Those most likely tit purellase fuel in the morning are consumers age 34-49 who gcnarally face time pressures related to orgaolzing ramlly acliviges, etc. There may be an vpportrm ly to focus marketing on IhIs segment to encourage more breaWast items. Meanwhile, those age 56 and older are most likely to purchase gas mid -day. outside of rush hours. A promotional mmpa ign around slowing down and enjoying a snack or meat Inside the store might appeal to this demographic 4: What time of the day do you often purchase gas? A— [°tiy Gas Consumers 7017 18-34 35-41) 50, Morning, or roughly tt am t0 10 am 22 19 25 21 Mid -clay, or roughly, 10 am to 3 pm 32 27 25 41 1600 Ouke Street Alexandria, Va 22314 THE ASSOCIATION FOR CONVENIENCE & FUEL RETAILING NACS Online, I Ant Looking For: search this site.. p RELATED ARTICLES Rr .` What Consumers Say About Fueling Rcad Mar, Are Average? By NAGS Road kivra I Says... 9y vMAw s plric Rosa Mnrr Packet Pg. 159 9.A.1.c How Consumers Behave at the Pump I NACS Online Your Business — .., http:llwww.naesnnline.convYourBusine�;s/FuelsCraterBasirs/Arlicles/P.. Afternoon, or roughly 3 pm to 7 pm 35 41 37 32 Night, or roughly 7 pm to midnight 9 t3 10 6 Ovemighl, or roughly mWalght to 0 am 1 0 t 0 Most fueling sltes offer three octane grades: regular (usually 87 ociarie), mid -grade Iusualry 89 OC19ney, and premium (usually 92 ar 93 octane). Regular octane is the dominant fuel, while those who buy higher•ociane firers are likely doing so because their vehicle requires it There are some variallons by age; yourger consumers are the least Interested in mid -grade as a fueling option. Q: What octane grade dove u typically purchase for the vehicle you most commonry drive? [%) Gas Consumers 2017 [lender Age M F 16.34 35-49 56+ Regular 82 80 84 92 78 86 Mid -grade 6 10 7 5 11 5 Premium 6 10 7 11 10 5 01her 1 0 1 0 T 1 Don't know 0 0 1 1 0 0 Fulty three quarters of consumers pay N plastic (73%). The percentage of Consumers who pay by plastic has increased by 9 percentage pants between 2009 and 2017. In reviewing subcategories_ debit cards are most used by females (41 %) and those age 18-34 (45%). Credit cards are most popular with those age 50 and older (47%). 0: Which payment method do you typically use to purchase gas? 1 dek I by Gas Consumers 2a17 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2009 Cash 25 2B 23 27 27 33 35 Credit 36 34 40 37 35 41 37 17rbit 37 38 a 36 37 24 27 Total 48Wand credo 73 72 78 7S 72 65 64 Shopping on Price The rise of nwbi le commerce, ap11s and pnce-rhedung web -sites make it easier for consumers to shop for deals and 'steals on everything from appliances to new shoes, a mentality that also carries over to gasWme Simpry put. no platter what Ilse price per gallon is, consumers want to And the best once they can. ApproAnnately two in three consumers have conaislently shopped on price, whether gas was as low as $1.62 per gallon at the start of 2009, or as high as S3.28 per gairan at the start of 2013. koweoer, a Focus on price is dirninishing and has fallen 10 percentage points In lust two years. Location has grown more important to mnsumers, as well as the in -Store food offer. The price per gallon IS leasl important to those who over the past s0 clays who bought a sandwich at a place where they also purchased gas (56% ) Q., When buying gas, which of the following factors Is Important to you? Track 1%) Gas Consumers 2011 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2000 Price 51 54 71 66 71 63 70 Location of stvrRistanon 25 20 16 20 16 211 19 Brand 0 9 8 a a a 9 Ease of entrance at "a 4 6 3 4 2 6 - 01her f 1 1 1 1 2 1 So how do price sensitive Consumers Shop by price? The traditional gas price sign remains the most common method, particularly among drivers during the morning rush (65%). Loyalty cards are a second choice and are used by one in seven (16%) price -sensitive consumers. Packet Pg. 160 9.A.1.c APPENDIX C L M m O m •L O Cu L \(D NNO I.L O J LO N N M O O O N N O N J d M LO O ti N N C O 2 d Q' Q 3 Y V Cu m U d U U r c R .Q a Co a Packet Pg. 161 9.A.1.c �aesrr Automotive Aftermarket Expenditures AIS 5-minute Drive Time Polygon Prepared by Esri Area: 4.22 square miles Demographic Summary 2021. 2026 Population 6,490 7,277 Households 3,200 3,601 Families 2,145 2,401 Median Age 58.1 59.3 Median Household Income $102,469 $112,092 Spending Potential Average Amount Index Spent Total Payments on Vehicles excluding Leases 148 $3,859,42 $12,350,141 Gasoline and Motor Oil Gasoline 146 $3,403.40 $10,890,886 Diesel Fuel 157 $85.07 $272,214 Motor Oil 138 $2090 $66,881 Other Vehicle Expenses Vehicle Maintenance & Repairs 157 $1,738.33 $5,562,653 Vehicle Coolant/Brake/Transmission Fluids 133 $11,93 $38,172 Tire Purchase/Replacement 154 $268.81 $924,200 Vehicle Parts/Equipment/Accessories 157 $111.63 $357,211 Vehicle Accessories including Labor 1S9 $17,30 $55,348 Vehicle Cleaning Services including Car Washes 1s8 $51.05 $163,34S Miscellaneous Auto Repair/Servicing 162 $195.64 $626,060 Vehicle Body Work & Painting 157 $58.87 $188,387 Vehicle or Engine Repairs 156 $371.09 $1,187,479 Vehicle Motor Tune-up 167 $79.35 $253,910 Lube/Oil Change & Oil Filters 151 $187.33 $599,469 Vehicle Front End Alignment/Wheel Balance & 155 $45.72 $146,299 Vehicle Shock Absorber Replacement 169 $22.52 $72,05.0 Tire Repair and Other Repair Work 158 $235.97 $755,120 Auto Repair Service Policy 160 $61.13 $195,602 Vehicle Insurance 149 $2,780.95 $8,899,030 Rental of Vehicles excluding Trips 166 $65.65 $210,086 Leased Vehicles 141 $666.52 $2,133,186 Basic Lease Charge for Cars/Trucks 140 $602.40 $1,927,678 Car/Truck Lease Fees & Down Payments 144 $64.22 $205,507 Vehicle Pers Property Taxes/State & Local Registr Fees 157 $334.25 $1,069,58S Driver's License Fees 147 $21.35 $68,318 Vehicle Inspection Fees 152 $21.39 $68,445 Parking Fees &Tolls excluding Trips 146 $177.66 $563,511 Parking Fees excluding Residence (Not on Trips) 143 $84,53 $270,493 Tolls/Electronic Toll Passes excluding Trips 150 $93.13 $298,018 Towing Charges 137 $10.89 $34,851 Auto Service Clubs & GPS Services 177 $63.69 $203,816 Data Note: The Spending Potential Index (SPI) Is household -based, and represents the amount spent for a product or service relative to a national average of 100. Source: Esn forecasts for Z021 and 2028; Consumer Spending data are derived from the 2018 and 2019 Consumer Expenditure Surveys, Bureau of Labor Statistics. �l m c a� E z c� a E M a Packet Pg. 162 9.A.1.c APPENDIX D L M m O m •L O Cu L \(D NNO I.L O J LO N N M O O O N N O N J d M LO O ti N N C O 2 d Q' Q 3 Y V Cu m U d U U r c R .Q a Co a Packet Pg. 163 9.A.1.c AJS DRIVE TIME AREA COMPETITIVE CONVENIENCE STORES/FUEL STATIONS Competitive Service Stations in Amerisite Drive Time Market Area Map ID Facilty Name Site Address DOR Facilities Report Status Convenience Store MPDs* Pumps 87Octane 890ctane 930ctane 1 Mobil 10861 AIRPORT RD N OPEN YES 3 6 4.10 4.50 4.80 2 Sam 'sClub 25501MMOKALEERD OPEN YES 6 12 3.96 4.40 3 Circle K - Shell 10996 WINTERVIEW DR OPEN YES 3 6 4.16 4.58 4.99 4 Circle K - Shell 5606TAVILLACIR OPEN YES 1 6 12 4.171 4.59 4.89 18 36 $4.10 $4.56 $4.74 Multiple Product Dispensers Packet Pg. 164 9.A.1.c Mobile 10861 Airport Rd. N. 4 Stations — 8 pumps Map Location 1 87 Octane 89 Octane 93 Octane $4.10 $4.50 $4.79 Packet Pg. 165 9.A.1.c Circle K - Shell 2550 Immokalee Road 6 Stations — 12 pumps Map Location 2 87 Octane 89 Octane 93 Octane $3.96 -- $4.40 Packet Pg. 166 9.A.1.c Circle K — Shell 10996 Winterview Drive 3 Stations — 6 pumps Map Location 3 87 Octane 89 Octane 93 Octane $4.16 $4.58 $4.88 Packet Pg. 167 9.A.1.c Circle K - Shell 5606 Tavilla Circle 6 Stations — 12 pumps Map Location 4 87 Octane 89 Octane 93 Octane $4.17 $4.59 $4.89 Packet Pg. 168 9.A.1.c APPENDIX E L M m O m •L O Cu L \(D NNO I.L O J LO N N M O O O N N O N J d M LO O ti N N C O 2 d Q' Q 3 Y V Cu m U d U U r c R .Q a Co a Packet Pg. 169 9.A.1.c r Packet Pg. 170 9.A.1.c Major Oil Keeps Its Brand Presence While the major oil companies are withdrawing from retail operations, their brands remain. In fact, roughly half of retail outlets sell fuel under the brand of one of the 1.5 largest refiner -suppliers. Virtually all of these branded loca- tions are operated by independent entrepreneurs who have signed a supply contract with a particular refiner/distributor to sell a specific brand of fuel, but these retailers do not share in the profit/loss of their suppliers. The remaining so% sold "unbranded" fuel. These stations often are owned by companies that have established their own fuel brand (i.e., QuikTrip, Wawa, 7-Eleven) and purchase fuels either on the open market or via unbranded con- tracts with a refiner/distributor. Other Retail Channels Sell Fuels Convenience stores sell more than So% of the fuels purchased in the United States, and their dominance continues to grow. Over the past decade, the number of convenience stores selling fuels has grown by rS% (from rio,895 to 127,589 stores). Meanwhile, the overall number of fueling locations has dropped. There were r5z,99S total retail fueling sites in the United States in 2013, the last year measured by the now -defunct National Petroleum News' Market - Facts. This was a steep and steady decline since 1994, when the station count topped 2o2,goo sites. Another channel also has seen growth over the past decade: big -box grocery stores and mass merchandising stores, otherwise known as "hypermarkets." As of May 2014, the 5,236 hypermarket retail fueling sites sold an estimated 13.8`,t<, of the motor fuels (gasoline) purchased in the United States, according to Energy Analysts International. These sites sell approximately z78,oao gal- lons per month, more than twice the volume of a traditional fuels retailer. T h a top Live hypermarkets selling fuel, by store count: • Kroger (r,zxo) • Walmart (999 stations, mainly Murphy USA with small mix of others; up to zoo new Murphy USA sites are due by end of 7.ot5 per agreement) • Sam's Club (505) • Costco (381) • Safeway (346) (Source. Energy Analys& IntrrnationaV The remainder of fuels sales in the United States comes from traditional ser- vice stations without convenience operations and very low -volume fueling sites, such as at marinas. 2015 MACS Retail Fuels Report 130 L m O m 0 E a� c R L O r a� to O c O w zn c J LO N N M O O O N N O N J rL M tr) O r` N N C O .y 0) Y R m U d U U C R .Q Q m a Packet Pg. 171 9.A.1.c APPENDIX F L M m O m •L O Cu L \(D NNO I.L O J LO N N M O O O N N O N J d M LO O ti N N C O 2 d Q' Q 3 Y V Cu m U d U U r c R .Q a Co a Packet Pg. 172 Vehicle Ownership in U.S. Cities Data and Map https://www.goveming.com/gov-data/car-ownership-numbers-of-vehicle... 9.A.1.c MAGAZINE NEWSLETTERS PODCASTS EVENTS SPONSORED: PAPERS SPECIAL PROJECTS STORIES DATA Vehicle Ownership in U.S. Cities Data and Map Some cities and areas of the country are much more auto -dependent than others. One way to assess a city's reliance on cars is to compare shares of households without access to vehicles. An estimated 8.7 percent of U.S. households were without vehicles in 2016. Car -free households are generally much more common in densely -populated urban areas and high poverty neighborhoods where residents can't afford Q vehicle ownership. Research also suggests younger families and one -person households are more likely to not Packet Pg. 173 7 of 21 7/25/2019, 4:34 PM Vehicle Ownership in U.S. Cities Data and Map https://www.goveming.com/gov-data/car-ownership-numbers-of-vehicle... 9.A.1.c own a car. Another useful measure of vehicle ownership for cities is the number of vehicles per household. According to Census survey estimates, there were about 1.8 vehicles available per U.S. household in 2016. Both vehicle statistics are shown below for jurisdictions with populations exceeding 100,000: Search: 2015 Households 2016 Households 2015 Vehicles P Jurisdiction Without Vehicles Without Vehicles Household Abilene, Texas 5.4% 8.0% 1.71 1.69 Akron, Ohio 14.5% 12.9% 1.42 1.46 Albuquerque, New Mexico 8.5% 6.9% 1.69 1.75 Alexandria, Virginia 10.1% 10.0% 1.38 1.34 Allentown, Pennsylvania 19.2% 16.9% 1.31 1.33 Amarillo, Texas 6.1 % 4.2% 1.73 1.81 Anaheim, California 5.7% 5.2% 2.01 2.05 Anchorage, Alaska 6.8% 6.1% 1.84 1.95 Ann Arbor, Michigan 12.4% 11.5% 1.45 1.44 Antioch, California 5.7% 3.3% 2.14 2.24 Arden -Arcade, California 8.8% 9.6% 1.53 1.58 Arlington, Texas 4.7% 3.7% 1.85 1.89 Arlington, Virginia 13.4% 12.7% 1.38 1.40 Arvada, Colorado 3.7% 3.6% 2.04 2.07 Athens -Clarke County, Georgia 11.2% 9.0% 1.52 1.67 Atlanta, Georgia 15.2% 16.4% 1.31 1.28 Augusta -Richmond County, 9.3% 9.1% 1.68 1.69 Georgia e____.__ n_i___a_ Source: Governing calculations of 2015 P7 nni c in/ i oIN 1 oc and 2016 one-year Census American Community Survey estimates. Note that one-year estimates have high margins of error for smaller cities. Cars Per Household for U.S. Cities Map The following map shows numbers of vehicles per household, calculated using two-year averages from 2015 and 2016 Census survey estimates. Data is shown for the 200 most populated cities, with cities having more vehicles shaded dark orange. Click a city to display its measures. Zoom in to view cities clustered together, or pan the map for Alaska and Hawaii. Packet Pg. 174 8 of 21 7/25/2019, 4:34 PM Vehicle Ownership in U.S. Cities Data and Map https://www.goveming. com/gov-data/car-ownership-numbers-of-vehicle... 9.A.1.c u 0 30 60mi 11, Ddyrona ❑iala Beach dynnellnn . t3ei[vna a Hill i! Krim [lear Wa bel, i � Rarrde ��• � Palm E3ay Fir' TfS�RjQR Cape Coral, Florida °''I' 2015-16 1.75 so rc Average Ratio Cap • �cr 2015 Vehicles 1.72 Per Household ha@ 2016 Vehicles 1.78 Per Household q Zoom to Iiey wes[ M X @of 21 Packet Pg. 175 7/25/2019, 4:34 PM 9.A.1.c APPENDIX G L i �./0 W �L 0 L r Z 0 c 0 a� c J LO N N M O O O N N O N J d M LO OD ti N N C O A N Q 3 Y V R m U d U U Jn r c Cu v Q a- Gl Co Q Packet Pg. 176 9.A.1.c Livingston Veterans Comm ercial —Commercial Pianned Unit Development — Traffic impact Statement — December 2021 Per FDOT's (Florida Department of Transportation) Site Impact Handbook (Section 2A.4) the number of pass -by trips should not exceed 10% of the adjacent street traffic. The FDOT presents this factor as a measure of reasonableness and illustrates that it is a rule -of -thumb and not a statistically studied factor. The Livingston Road segment from Imperial Street to Immokalee Road (Collier County Link ID #51) is the monitored roadway link directly accessed by the project traffic. The 2021 peak hour, peak direction traffic volume for this roadway segment is 1,770 vehicles per hour (vph) as illustrated in the currently adopted 2021 Annual Update and Inventory Report [AU IRj. The project is estimated to generate 93 peak hour, peak direction pass -by trips {Proposed Scenario 1 — highest traffic impact} which represent approximately 5% of the adjacent street traffic. Trip Generation Projections The estimated trip generation associated with the proposed development scenarios are illustrated in Tables 2A, 20 and 2C. Detailed calculations can be found in Appendix C: ITE Trip Generation Calculations. Collier County's Concurrency Management System is intended to ensure that there is adequate roadway capacity available to serve current and future development. Transportation Concurrency is a measure of the capacity of the roadway system to support the adopted level of service for vehicular traffic. As part of the Transportation Element, the County established minimum acceptable level of service standards on the existing highway system. For County facilities, the level of service standard is measured on a peak hour basis. In agreement with the Collier County TI5 Guidelines and Procedures, significantly impacted roadways are identified based on the proposed project highest peak hour trip generation and consistent with the peak hour of the adjacent street traffic. Based on the information contained in Collier County 2021 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR), the peak hour for adjacent roadway network is PM. Table 2A Trip Generation — Proposed Scenario 1— Average Weekday Development Weekday AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ITE Land Use Size j2-way) Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Strip Retail Plaza 11,000 square feet 599 16 10 26 42 41 83 Convenience Store/Gas Station 6,OOOsquare feet 4,203 170 169 339 164 163 327 Total 4,802 186 179 365 206 204 410 Internal Capture ❑ ❑ 1 ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ 0 External Traffic 4,802 186 179 365 206 2134 410 Pass -by Traffic 1,771 89 88 177 92 93 185 Net External Traffic 3,031 97 91 188 114 r 111 225 TrebiIoock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 7 Packet Pg. 177 9.A.1.c APPENDIX H L M m O m •L O Cu L \(D NNO I.L O J LO N N M O O O N N O N J d M LO O ti N N C O 2 d Q' Q 3 Y V Cu m U d U U r c R .Q a Co a Packet Pg. 178 9.A.1.c Fueling Sales Inside and Out I CSP Daily News bttp:llwww.Lspdai lynews.cnm/Vri rLt /csp-magazine/arf cle/fLwling-sales-in. INDUSTRY NEWS MERGERS&ACQDISROUNS HJU DATA SPDNSDREUCUNTENt EVENTS eerwags rvudserrice General Merchandise services suadrs i Candy Tobaew MERCHANDISING MADE EASY far � Torches & fuel all in one place. WHOLESALE PRICING Print , CSP Magazine Attr July "13 cumi Fueling Sales Inside and Out -Oral An "elusive peek at latest VideoMining heat -map study reveals challenge of s�"` pump -to -store conversion, opportunity of layout - By Samantha Otter, Senior Editor/Fuets, CSP More than 25 years ago, pay at the pump debuted in the United States, introducing great Convenience to motorists and a big conundrum to retailers. If you enable customers to pay for fuel at the pump, how do you TGday's Tc persuade them to come inside the store to buy higher -margin items? If recent research from AdeoMiningCorp. is any indication, it's a chatlenge that fuel retailers have still not mastered. "Sixty-nine percent of gas customers are just paying forgas and leaving, regardless of whether they are paying at the pump or prepaying [inside the store s,"says Priya Baboo, executive vice president of shopper insights & strategy for Video -Mining Carp., State College, Pa, which produces the annual C-Stare Shopper Insights (CSI) Program, a research effort that documents the c-store shopping trip. -this Fourth iteration of the study, ccnducled in late summer 2012 and shared exclusively with CSP, included 10 chains representing 144 stores in a0 markets. Consider that for every 100 gasoline customers, 64 pay at the pump, and of the 64 pay only for gas and leave, according to Video Mining. Let's put aside this tatter group —`It is much harder to convince someone who is just thinking of pumpinggas to walk into the stare, because they may be in a hurry," Baboo says —and focus soleiy on the opportunity presented by the others. The 36 fuel customers who walk into the store to pay are lruly'low-hanging fruit, "she insists, "because in the store you have a better opportunity of converting them_ But unfortunately, we're not leveraging that ❑pportunity_" How poor is that leverage? Less than a third of these customers will u{timate ly make an in-store purchase. VAPa Whining evatuates this type of c-store shopper behaviorthrough a combination oftachnologies_ Ceibng- mounted cameras track customers' movements through the c-store, while proprietary video -analysis suftware processes millions of hours of shopping trips_ This data is cross-referenced with point -of -sale data to correlate store traffic with purchasing behavior and generate insights on everything ham the basics (average time spent in store, average in-store basket) to the rates at which customers shopped particular categories and made a purchase. More New Engla Petroleum Mark, Packet Pg. 179 9.A.1.c APPENDIX I L i �./0 W �L 0 L r Z 0 c 0 a� c J LO N N M O O O N N O N J d M LO OD ti N N C O A N Q 3 Y V R m U d U U Jn r c Cu v Q a- Gl Co Q Packet Pg. 180 East Naples sees influx of self storage facilities along U.S. 41 https://www.naplesnews.com/story/money/business/local/2019/10/16/eas... 9.A.1.c Naples Daily News LOCAL BUSINESS Boxes everywhere? Here's why Naples is seeing an increase of units Andrew Wigdor ,.* Naples Published 7:00 a.m. ET Oct. 16, 2019 1 Updated 4:10 p.m. ET Oct. 16, 2019 'East storage Development in East Naples keeps coming but not in the form some residents support. Self -storage facilities are popping up fast in Collier County, and East Naples is no exception. In particular, an influx of large storage buildings has been seen along the community's major thoroughfare, and some residents say these commodities take up prime real estate on U.S. 41 that could be better used for upscale restaurants, hotels and shopping centers. In the 12-mile stretch from Sandpiper Street to Basik Drive along U.S. 41, there are nine self -storage buildings that have been built, are being built or are proposed. Of those, four are already built, four are proposed and one is in the process of being built. The self - storage building currently being constructed is Carl's White Glove Personal Storage & Wine Vault, a three-story structure that will be over go,000 square feet. The projected opening date for the facility is Feb. 1, 2020. Bruce Nichols, the facility's wine consultant and owner of The Wine Store in Naples, defended the construction of the new storage building, saying that the "demand far outweighs supply for wine storage" in the area. "The demand is certainly there," he said. Why are storage units so hot in Southwest Florida? According to data collected by Maxwell, Hendry & Simmons, LLC, a Southwest Florida 1 of 6 Packet Pg. 181 2/28/2022, 5:42 PM East Naples sees influx of self storage facilities along U.S. 41 https://www.naplesnews.com/story/money/business/local/2019/10/16/eas... 9.A.1.c real estate appraisal firm, Collier County has approximately 9.02 square feet of storage space per person, which exceeds the national average of about 6.5 square feet of storage space per person. 0 m "Unlike other areas of the country, we don't have basements or other areas to store items Fa that have been accumulated over the years," said Gerald Hendry, a state -certified real estate appraiser with the firm, in an emailed statement. "Moreover, other storage components such as open storage for boats and RVs are in high demand as most of the communities that we have developed over the past few decades are deed restricted with no options for this type of storage." In Lee and Collier County within the past 12 months, approximately 2,300 apartment units have been constructed and 3,700 units are under construction, Hendry noted. "These units are all small with limited storage," he said. "Twenty years ago, everyone had a 'junk drawer' in their house. It now seems as if everyone has a 'junk unit' in a storage facility." According to Collier County hearing examiner Mark Strain, East Naples starting seeing an influx of self -storage units in the past few years. Strain said that in the area of East Naples along U.S. 41, there is a decent amount of property already designated as General Commercial Districts, or C-4, and Heavy Commercial Districts, C-5, making much of the unused land "shovel -ready." C-4 allows self storage as conditional uses, and C-5 allows the commodities as permitted uses. "Those two zoning districts are easier to locate self storage in than many others," Strain said. "Plus, the land prices might be a little less expensive there than other parts of the county." "Zoning takes a long period of time to go through to change, and if you already have the zoning, that's a big plus," he added. "There is a lot of commercial zoning from end to end in East Naples." Strain said that if a developer was to build a 1oo,000 square foot office building, they may have to provide over 200 parking spaces. However, if a developer was to build a self - storage facility of the same size, they could possibly have less than 15. 2 of 6 Packet Pg. 182 2/28/2022, 5:42 PM East Naples sees influx of self storage facilities along U.S. 41 https://www.naplesnews.com/story/money/business/local/2019/10/16/eas... 9.A.1.c "The difference between the land costs to provide a huge parking lot with lighting and shrubbery and landscaping and maintenance versus just a handful of spaces around a storage facility, that's a lot less cost for an operation that has low volume and low overhead," he said. Read: Grant to train hundreds of 'high -wage' Arthrex employees marks more growth for company County commissioner leads pushback on storage units Longtime County Commissioner Donna Fiala, who represents District 1, has been outspoken in her opposition to self -storage facilities in East Naples for years. "The storage units are buying up the prime property right along U.S. 41, and the thing is we need places to shop," she said. "We need restaurants. We need services for the community, and a storage unit provides no services for the community whatsoever." Fiala wants entities that can employ more East Naples residents, as some self -storage facilities employ less than a handful of workers. She would also like to see more options for locals and visitors to pay for food, clothes and entertainment along the highway. "I was trying to encourage people to leave the front part (of property along U.S. 41) open so we get some of these much -needed community facilities for us," she said. "But they're just piling them in here." "It used to be that (residents) could look out to their backyard," Fiala added. "Now, they're looking at a three-story wall." In late 2016, Fiala proposed the idea of a year -long moratorium on gas stations, car washes, pawn shops and self -storage facilities along 7 miles of U.S. 41 in East Naples The moratorium, however, was never passed. Instead, the Board of County Commissioners approved a motion that directed a "corridor study" be pursued for the area, which was completed by Johnson Engineering and accepted by the board in April 2O18. The study examined the area along U.S. 41 from Palm Street to Price Street, which is approximately 6.8 miles. The study's purpose was to determine the "public's preferences for future development types and uses so that those types of development and uses can be facilitated and incentivized through Comprehensive Plan policies and Land Development 3 of 6 Packet Pg. 183 2/28/2022, 5:42 PM East Naples sees influx of self storage facilities along U.S. 41 https://www.naplesnews.com/story/money/business/local/2019/10/16/eas... 9.A.1.c Code." According to the results of surveys conducted during public input meetings in 2017 and 2018 as a part of the study, 67% of participants did not support self -storage facilities. However, 31% were in favor of multi -story storage facilities with Mediterranean architecture and landscaping. Additionally, 64% did not support gas stations, but 30% favored stations that are buffered with landscaping. An overwhelming go of participants supported new hotels. Eighty-nine percent supported more local restaurants, 89 % supported more sit-down restaurants and 79 % supported destination shopping. Other notable results included that 94% agreed with incentives to encourage preferred development types, and 62% preferred a community -based branding effort to establish an identity and marketing program for the area. Recommended actions were developed to address the needs of the community as voiced by public participants in the study. Ultimately, the recommendations relating to storage units were to consider separation requirements, location standards or minimum percentage retail or office mix as a part of developments to "mitigate for proliferation along this corridor." As a result of the study and the recommendations, a Land Development Code amendment was initiated to create a separation requirement between self -storage buildings along U.S. 41 between Airport -Pulling Road and Price Street. That stretch of 41 includes two self -storage buildings that currently exist and at least three that have been proposed or are being built. Read: 'Failed' East Naples shopping center could spring back to life with proposed apartment complex This amendment was reviewed by the Board of County Commissioners on Sept. lo, and the board directed that it be brought up at a future date for discussion on further incentivization for including retail in self -storage building sites. Additional research is now being conducted, and staff members are drafting changes to the amendment, according to Collier County officials. 4of6 Packet Pg. 184 2/28/2022, 5:42 PM East Naples sees influx of self storage facilities along U.S. 41 https://www.naplesnews.com/story/money/business/local/2019/10/16/eas... 9.A.1.c In an Oct. 8 Board of County Commissioners meeting, Fiala suggested that the bottom floor of future storage unit buildings have commercial entities, such as a restaurant or retail store, with all other floors entirely dedicated to storage. "That way then the community would still be able to be having a place to shop, eat, buy shoes or get a haircut," she said before the board. She suggested that the storage facility owners could rent out the floors or sell them to make the compromise possible. The board then initiated staff to further discuss the possibility at a later date. Fiala's possible replacement says residents are'tired' of storage units Fiala is not seeking reelection in the upcoming District 1 commissioner's race, and East Naples Civic Association President Jacob Winge has thrown his hat into the ring for 2020. The new contender isn't any less tough on storage units. "The people of East Naples are pretty tired of storage units and gas stations on every corner," he said. "People who live (in East Naples) are having to go to North Naples to utilize services, to go out to eat, to go run errands," he said. "People in East Naples are craving to have services there because they don't have any." Winge doesn't mind storage facilities being built in the area; he said he just wants them off Of U.S. 41. "You can build storage units, but put them a mile back from the main road," he said. "They shouldn't be on a main road. That's where you want really good commercial to be." Read: With Collier Commissioner Donna Fiala not seeking reelection, three vie for District 1 seat He said the East Naples Civic Association is leading the charge of creating an official East Naples Community Development Plan that will work to identify a clear community vision for what residents would like to see in the area. Jean Kungle, an East Naples resident of 23 years and real estate broker, agreed she'd like to see less storage units and more services that residents can enjoy. 5 of 6 Packet Pg. 185 2/28/2022, 5:42 PM East Naples sees influx of self storage facilities along U.S. 41 https://www.naplesnews.com/story/money/business/local/2019/10/16/eas... 9.A.1.c "We just need more activity entertainment type things to do," she said. "If they use up all that land for storage units and gas stations, we won't have anything left to do with it." Despite concerns from others, Bob Tiffany, a sales manager at 41 East Flooring in East Naples, said he's just happy to see the area grow. "I don't believe there's too many (storage facilities)," he said. "As long as the place is being redeveloped and beautified in a way. (East Naples) has come a long way in the last 25 years that I've seen." Reach Andrew Wigdor at awigdor@gannett.com and on Twitter @andrezu wgdor In the Know: Inside buzz (with photos) at Oakes, Costco expansion, latest on Wawa 6 of 6 Packet Pg. 186 2/28/2022, 5:42 PM 9.A.1.c APPENDIX J L M m O m •L O Cu L \(D NNO I.L O J LO N N M O O O N N O N J d M LO O ti N N C O 2 d Q' Q 3 Y V Cu m U d U U r c R .Q a Co a Packet Pg. 187 Developer makes big gains in self -storage I Business Observer I Busines.. https: //www.businessobserverfl. com/article/developer-makes-big-gains-i... 9.A.1.c 0 PR ` AR Pnnnnn[npl Ai nrAl rOTATr BUSINESS OBSERVER THURSDAY, OCT. 29, 2020 1 year ago Developer makes big gains in self -storage SHARE f W 0 COMMENTS D i It doesn't have the sizzle of multimillion -dollar construction projects. But self -storage done right, discovers one area firm, could deliver a tidy profit. by: Mark Gordon I Managing Editor Seagate Development Group has built a brand in the Southwest Florida construction market by building corporate headquarters. The recent list includes a 150,000-square-foot complex for cancer screening firm NeoGenomics, a $60 million project in Fort Myers; a 52,000-square-foot facility for Conditioned Air of Naples; and a new, $11 million home in Fort Myers for logistics firm Scotlynn USA. Although those projects grab headlines, and of course bring in revenue for the $65.5 million company, Seagate is, more quietly, developing a profitable niche `The next 10, 20 years in Southwest Florida have a really long runway. KT _E 1 of 8 Packet Pg. 188 2/28/2022, 6:16 PM Developer makes big gains in self -storage I Business Observer I Busines... https://www.businessobserverfl.com/article/developer-makes-big-gains-i... 9.A.1.c Q terms of reaching profitable rent stabilization, company executives say — including one that opened in April, M during the depths of pandemic stay-at-home orders. "Self -storage will always be big in Florida because of the lack of basements, and the extra storage space in an attic is too hot," Seagate CEO Matt Price says. "There are a lot of people, and there's not a lot of places to put stuff." It helps that Seagate attacked the self -storage market with a counterintuitive twist. The traditional way developers build self -storage is to go near, next to or across the street from multifamily projects. Those are infill projects that, Price says, go where the "bodies are." Instead of that, Price says Seagate aims to build self - storage facilities "where the bodies are going to be." In that way, the company's approach is data -driven on making the right land purchases as to where development is going to happen next in the Lee -Collier area. Combined, it paid around $3 million for the land where it built its first three self -storage facilities. Those locations are University Storage in Estero, a 90,000-square-foot, three-story, 600-unit facility; Ave Maria, a 51,000-square-foot, one-story, two -building facility; and Arbor Towne in Fort Myers, a 76,000-square-foot, 654-unit facility. Through Oct. 21, those facilities were 53.44%, 55.48% and 71.7% leased out, respectively. The goal is to get to ART aE cupancy in each facility, which, says Bill Price, Seagate's chairman and Matt Price's father, woul ARTIN ICEXT LE i profit. "One of the best parts about the business is once you sign the lease, people tend to stay," B_ Price says. "It's very, very much an inertia business: Once you're are in, you tend to stay in." Courtesy. Seagate Development Group's Arbor Towne self -storage facility is on Colonial Boulevard in Fort Myers. Not only does Seagate look at future population patterns, but also the nitty-gritty of self -storage, adds Bill Price, is in the ground cost per - buildable square foot. That's the combination of the cost per square foot for the land and cost per square foot to build the facility. Too high a figure, and the building can't set competitive lease rates. "That's really important," Bill Price says. Another key to Seagate's model, the elder Price says, is to partner with the right self -storage flag. For Seagate, that's CubeSmart, a Pennsylvania - based Real Estate Investment Trust that manages some 500 self -storage properties nationwide, covering more than 35 million rentable square feet. Working with CubeSmart is a nod to another lesson the company has learned: Stick to your strengths. "We quickly realized we had no clue how to do all this," Bill Price says. "We needed a sophisticated company with data algorithms" that could handle leasing, pricing, marketing Packet Pg. 189 2 of 8 2/28/2022, 6:16 PM Developer makes big gains in self -storage I Business Observer I Busines.. https: //www.businessobserverfl. com/article/developer-makes-big-gains-i... 9.A.1.c 0 Seagate was approached by a business partner three years ago about self -storage opportunities. The firm did research and due diligence for eight months. "We really wanted to understand the complexities of the business," Matt Price says. area in the country.' Matt Price, Seagate Development Group With that understanding and the early success, the company plans to expand its self -storage portfolio. It's looking "seriously" at two possible deals, Matt Price says, and if "the land part makes sense, we will consider doing it." In the meantime, the company isn't slowing down on its headquarters or other projects. Like many peers in construction, 2020 was going really well until the coronavirus derailed it. "It hasn't been as bad as we thought," Matt Price says of the ensuing pandemic, "but we are aren't having the kind of year it was going to be before COVID-19." Long-term, Price remains all -in on the region's potential. "The next 10, 20 years in Southwest Florida have a really long runway," Price says. " I wouldn't trade our Southwest Florida business market for most any other area in the country." PREV ` ARTICLE <— Prev Article advertisement advertisement N EXT ARTICLE Next Article ---> 3 of 8 Packet Pg. 190 2/28/2022, 6:16 PM 9.A.1.c APPENDIX K L i 0 Co �L 0 E C� G L r Z 0 c 0 a� c J LO N N M O O O N N O N J d M LO OD ti N N C O A N Q 3 Y V R m U d U U Jn r c Cu v Q a- Gl Co Q Packet Pg. 191 9.A.1.c Demographic Estimating Conference Executive Summary December 13, 2021 The Demographic Estimating Conference met on December 13, 2021, to adopt a new population forecast. The new estimates reflect the most recent demographic and economic -related data and trends, including the 2020 Census count of population and households, revised intercensal population estimates from 2011 through 2019 based on the 2020 Census count, and the official state April 1, 2021 estimate of population. The 2020 Census population count of 21,538,187 was slightly lower than the previously adopted estimate of 21,596,068 (-57,881,-0.27%). Based on this difference and other demographic and economic data, a revised historical series was estimated for 2011 through 2019 (shown in green in the table below). Starting from the lower 2020 population level, population growth over the past year (April 1, 2020 to April 1, 2021) was estimated at 360,758 (1.67%). This was an incremental increase relative to the last conference, with the change reflecting the stronger than expected net migration. Natural increase, the other component of population growth, was more negative than expected due to increased deaths. Compared to the last conference, the short-term population projections (shown in blue in the table below) were increased, maintaining the strengthened net -migration projections throughout. In addition, natural increase is expected to remain negative throughout most of the forecast horizon as deaths continue to outpace births. Overall, the forecast keeps the pattern that the Conference has long been expecting, with growth slowing modestly each year. Average household size was adjusted to incorporate the 2020 Census data, then held relatively constant in the near -term, reflecting the economic impact from the pandemic on household dynamics and structure; all else being equal, larger household sizes lead to a lower number of households. Between A per yearn increases Change from the Prior Period Change from the Prior Forecast April 1 Population Percent Numeric 2010 18,801,332 2011 18,949,860 0.79% 148,528 44,790 2012 19,134,956 0.98% 185,096 60,522 2013 19,337,590 1.06% 202,634 78,047 2014 19,585,096 1.28% 247,506 77,727 2015 19, 879, 230 1.50% 294,134 64,047 2016 20,201,450 1.62% 322,220 52,796 2017 20,524,865 1.60% 323,415 40,723 2018 20,854,945 1.61% 330,080 14,377 2019 21,189,849 1.61% 334,904 -18,740 2020 21,538,187 1.64% 348,338 -57,881 2021 21,898,945 1.67% 360,758 -26,840 2022 22,247,451 1.59% 348,506 2,022 2023 22,564,419 1.42% 316,968 9,415 2024 22,870,046 1.35% 305,627 17,927 2025 23,164,008 1.29% 293,962 25,455 2026 23,448,282 1.23% 284,274 31,830 2027 23,720,981 1.16% 272,699 37,515 2028 23,982,341 1.10% 261,360 43,765 2029 24,232,373 1.04% 250,032 48,354 2030 24,471,129 0.99% 238,756 52,002 2031 24,699,012 0.93% 227,883 54,952 2021 and April 1, 2026, population growth is expected to average 309,867 net new residents =representing a compound growth rate of 1.41% over this five-year time horizon. These Packet Pg. 192 9.A.1.c APPENDIX L L 0 co �L 0 E C� G L r Z 0 c 0 a� c J LO N N M O O O N N O N J d M LO OD ti N N C O A N Q 3 Y V R m U d U U Jn r a ca v Q a- Gl 00 Q Packet Pg. 193 9.A.1.c 11 aawap Csmmnarty umtn COLLIER COUNTY PERMANENT POP11117 ION GSTIA4IT ES ae4 PROJECTIONS By ft—ing C—.-,ty �..1v- M.J.n md•. „slm vim, ir+ ., •y.m1v- i-.In.ln mrn[us pluiyimu oNlvbrir Ol.....:n. r:.....b..:n. a mm , '26,6 V jm, §14 ftn r'�Il ffi1�fti, M"i mH, V Z) 'ill NN-N-01 Nepipp 55. 105 fi5.442 Wl, ,U W.267 SB,681 67.092 S7,714 58, 393 58.956 69.365 59,68E SN - South N4 Its 320A' 28.859 29.490 X269 30.829 32.W7 33.318 33.842 34.304 34.882 36,372 36.617 35,787 CN -C.r INa a' r;�60J 18,856 1B,917 18,99d 19,059 79,146 19,259 19.422 19.590 19,6y4 19676 20,027 20,663 EN - East Naples '•! •r: , 22. 322 22,340 22,370 22,390 22,540 2Z,958 27.078 73.351 23.899 2d,714 25,784 26,2d4 GG- Golden Gale - 44,963 46.142 46,357 46.464 46,495 46.623 46.667 46,&2A 45.852 48.1 L18 46,662 46.930 LIE -Urban Esbdes . 1ti 36. 744 39.167 34,704 40,4130 41.594 43,D58 44.44M 45.WT 41,506 48,sJ8.3 l5o.ou 50,7m RE -Rural Eslatas +.y,917 3d,760 34.661 35.015 M.141 35,337 35,767 36,6Ti8 39.566 41.04B 43.695 46.669 d8.741 M • Marco 7 3S8 1,221 f,773 1.226 1,263 1.359 1,47E 1.775 2.057 2,228 2,356 2.43d 2.439 RF-Royal Fake alm12r001 12,857 13�494 1d,128 M1d,854} i6,7d1 18,60fi i7.723 79,246 ZD,557 21,813 $Y,025 C- Ccrkscrow I.M. 4,962 5,372 7,804 8,fi74 9,fi79 10,927 12,DB0 13,54fi ld,8fi6 75,933 76,857 77,466 -Immokalea 22,032 24.303 1 24.669 24,745 24,819 24,868 24,954 25.083 25.317 25.593 25,875 26,090 201 6C -BIq Cypress !9 1 233 1 236 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 L'Mi p-n M Slldf I21, IaU ZV5, 28 290,414 2%,723 M,87O 3O3,6f9 310,112 J18,460 :U4,6U :T.i3, rbb 343, 1 B5 361,8l2 31.7 zb4 eftr.Yas es A. es A. e6mses .s 9.s .s a.s e[trnYas e[tr.Yas .A A. eaNnates ertlna[es pq.tlons prole[lcas Gtira 1L771 2mu IDIl 2D12 2D13 2IM4 3l6 2015 M17 a719 a719 3120 2121 :Vlrgl ado city 4V4 4O3 1 =4 1 405 1 409 1 418 43O 1 am 426 418 a- 432 435 I arco Island r4,973 16.426 16,482 16.639 16.662 16,668 16,829 16,963 17.01% 17:221 17,472 17,604 17,621 laples i 11,J02 1 19,494 1 19,5181 19,590 1 19.6631 19,629 1 19,632 1 19,966 1 20,270 1 20,633 1 20.993 1 21.230 1 21.565 Inmrpnn -sum 36,788 06,326 36,4C3 36,633 36,653 36,614 36,890 37,386 37360 38,272 38.893 39.266 39,620 C DU HTYMBE TOTAL '57,928 1 322.653 1 329,817 1 331,768 1 335,228 1 340,295 1 347,D02 1 353,1336 362,409 1 372,027 1 382,078 1 390,937 I 397,975 1jT.......,...a..,,................... m.,,.m,.,...e....«.......R...,1-3=...N10-M. b E.....«.....r.......»...,.«...�..»....,.«.,..,: 30R7 C«.,,..« d7W G.,.„: 8.,«. «E«.»»..« 8--,R..«.... I8ES RI R........ n.. .«. A.......n.. F,perrdhy C ib- Uo cny %oaind Dmialen, Juaa 19,2921 Packet Pg. 194 9.A.1.c APPENDIX M L 0 Co �L 0 E C� G L r Z 0 c 0 a� c J LO N N M O O O N N O N J d M LO OD ti N N C O A N Q 3 Y V R m U d U U Jn r c Cu v Q a- Gl Co Q Packet Pg. 195 9.A.1.c Appendix Table N — NNPC Potential Self -Storage Vacant Commercial and Non-Ag Parcels FID PIN ACRES GIS O NAME1 LUSE D 31434 148640005 24.52 TRINITY REAL ESTATE TRUST Acreage not zoned agricultural 31534 155884207 12.83 LODGE ABBOTT INVEST ASSOC LLC Acreage not zoned agricultural 33287 238040007 10.04 HERRING ET AL, CHARLES E Acreage not zoned agricultural 33286 238000005 5.03 VENTAS NAPLES LLC Acreage not zoned agricultural Packet Pg. 196 9.A.1.c 1 Planning —Execution— Re suits,. Real Estate Econometrics, Inc. MEMORANDUM TO: Rachel Hansen Collier County Growth Management Department FROM: G. Russell Weyer President Real Estate Econometrics, Inc. SUBJECT: Response to PL 20220003325 Market Study Comments DATE: April 25, 2023 VIA: Email Real Estate Econometrics, Inc. ("Consultant") has prepared the following responses to the Collier County Staff comments letter to the Growth Management Plan Amendment Adoption PL 20220003225 — Livingston Road/Veteran's Memorial Boulevard Commercial Infill Subdistrict ("Subject Site"). 1.& 2. Include Lee County Parcels and a 3-Mile Radius Market Area. Consultant utilized 3-mile radius ("Market Area') for its analysis as requested by Staff in the Collier County Plan Amendment Adoption comments letter. Figure 1 on the next page shows the Subject Site's 3-mile radius market area as it relates to the surrounding geography. The market area falls about 1/3 in Lee County and 2/3 in Collier County. The new market area includes self- storage facilities both existing and proposed along Bonita Beach Road and both existing and proposed self -storage facilities west of the North Naples planning area that was previously used in the original market study. The new market area does not include the self -storage facilities in the Pine Ridge Road industrial park since they are now outside of the 3-mile radius market area. Real Estate Econometrics, Inc. 707 Orchid Drive Suite 100 Naples, FL 34102 www.ree-i.com rweyer(c_ree-i.com (239) 269-1341 Packet Pg. 197 9.A.1.c FIGURE 1. Subject Site 3-Mile Radius Market Area Source: Environmental Systems Research Institute and Consultant As in the original market study, the Consultant utilized Radius Union, an online tool that tracks self -storage market demographics, occupancy and rental rates in addition to new and existing self -storage supply. Figure 2 on the next page indicates the location of existing and proposed self -storage facilities within a 3-mile radius of the Subject Site. There are 10 existing facilities and 2 proposed facilities in the Market Area. Real Estate Econometrics, Inc. 707 Orchid Drive Suite 100 Naples, FL 34102 www.ree-i.com rweyer(c_ree-i.com (239) 269-1341 Packet Pg. 198 9.A.1.c FIGURE 2. Subject Site 3-Mile Radius Self -Storage Supply - � � p � -' � • ppxi ` F`mr�rs eff'! , donna Sm.agc Inn Source: Radius Union and Consultant E Ian,SL 'rFF fR r F4RA�E Gaol aq r a u F ' F Smart5lnp [P9K Pul — 'WStunge +v- �_ r Table 1 below identifies the 12 facilities by map ID, name, address, square feet and year built. A complete description of each facility can be found in Appendix A. TABLE 1. Subject Site 3-Mile Radius Self -Storage Supply Map ID Facility Address Square Feet Permitted SF Year Built 1 Extra Space Storage 11301 Bonita Beach Rd. SE 69,083 2008 2 Bonita Beach Self Storage 12701 Bonita Beach Rd. SE 64,659 2023 3 Life Storage 12750 Trade Center Dr 79,480 2018 4 Patriot Stor-All 10928 K Nine Dr 22,102 1981 5 Midgard Self Storage 15600 Old 41 N 78,438 1998 6 Ace Super Storage 16300 Old 41 N 50,091 1986 7 Public Storage 15800 Old 41 N 52,842 1988 8 Extra Space Storage 14600 Old 41 N 36,684 1986 9 Extra Space Storage 10550 Goodlette-Frank Rd. 115,824 2001 10 The Lock Up Self Storage 1025 Piper Blvd. 80,883 2008 11 New Self Storage Facility 5324 Useppa Way 60,000 2024 12 Life Storage 5304 Useppa Way 78,647 2018 664,074 124,659 Source: Radius Union, ESRI and Consultant Real Estate Econometrics, Inc. 707 Orchid Drive Suite 100 Naples, FL 34102 www.ree-i.com rweyer(a_ree-i.com (239) 269-1341 Packet Pg. 199 9.A.1.c Radius Union also provides demographic information for the Market Area. They utilize the same American Community Survey data that is provided by the U.S. Census Bureau as an annual update to their decennial census. The most recent decennial census was in 2020. The Consultant also uses the same data in its market studies as that data is provided by the Environmental Systems Research Institute's ("ESRI") geographic information system. Table 2 below encapsulates the 3-mile radius demographic data. The actual webpage data can be found in Appendix B. TABLE 2. Subject Site 3-Mile Radius Demographics Population 42,307 1-Year Population Growth 8.70% 3-Year Population Growth 12.40% Average Annual 3-Year Growth 4.13% Households 17,403 Single Family 9,920 Multifamily 7,483 Renter Occupied 3,837 Average Household Income $118,013 Median Household Income $88,263 Per Capita Income $48,545 Median House Value $444,370 Household Size 2.4 Source: Radius Union and U.S. Census Bureau The Consultant next prepared the supply/demand analysis table using the data from previous Tables 1 & 2. The demand side of the equation was calculated by first using the Market Area population of 42,307 in the decennial year 2020 as the base year. The demographic information provided indicated that the 1-year population growth was 8.7% for the Market Area and the 3-year population growth was 12.4%. The Consultant annualized the 12.4% population growth to 4.13% to calculate future population growth for the Market Area. Next, the existing self -storage square footage (664,074) was divided by the Market Area population (42,307) to determine the square foot per capita demand for self -storage (15.7 SF per capita). The new facilities were then added to the supply in years 2023 and 2024 and the Subject Site's square feet in 2025. Table 3 on the next page shows those calculations through a 10-year horizon from 2023. Real Estate Econometrics, Inc. 707 Orchid Drive Suite 100 Naples, FL 34102 www.ree-i.com rweyer(a_ree-i.com (239) 269-1341 Packet Pg. 200 9.A.1.c TABLE 3. Subject Site 3-Mile Market Area Self -Storage Supply/Demand Analysis 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 3-Mile Population 42,307 44,056 45,877 47,773 49,748 51,804 53,945 Demand per Capita 15.70 15.70 15.70 15.70 15.70 15.70 15.70 Demand 664,074 691,522 720,105 749,870 780,864 813,140 846,750 New Project(s) 0 0 0 64,659 60,000 100,000 0 Supply 664,074 664,074 664,074 728,733 788,733 888,733 888,733 Supply/(Defecit) 0 (27,448) (56,031) (21,137) 7,869 75,593 41,983 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 3-Mile Population 56,175 58,497 60,914 63,432 66,054 68,784 71,627 Demand per Capita 15.70 15.70 15.70 15.70 15.70 15.70 15.70 Demand 881,749 918,194 956,146 995,667 1,036,821 1,079,677 1,124,303 New Project(s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Supply 888,733 888,733 888,733 888,733 888,733 888,733 888,733 Supply/(Defecit) 6,984 (29,461) (67,413) (106,934) (148,088) (190,944) (235,570) Source: Radius Union, U.S. Census Bureau & Consultant Table 3 above indicates that the starting in the year 2021, the Market Area is showing a deficit of self -storage space to address the demand from the new population growth. The addition of 64,659 square feet completed in 2023 and the proposed 60,000 square feet in 2024 brings the market back into equilibrium in 2024. The addition of the Subject Site's 100,000 square feet in 2026 absorbs some of the increased demand for that year and becomes fully absorbed by the demand through 2027. Additional self -storage facilities will be required in the subsequent years to address the future demand, which will ultimately outpace the supply of self -storage by over 235,000 in the 2033 horizon year. Real Estate Econometrics, Inc. 707 Orchid Drive Suite 100 Naples, FL 34102 www.ree-i.com rweyer(a_ree-i.com (239) 269-1341 Packet Pg. 201 9.A.1.c 3. Does the table of potential supply of commercial parcels include lands designated commercial by the Future Land Use Element, such as in Activity Centers or commercial tracts of PUDs? The table of potential supply of commercial parcels did not include such parcels. Below are the vacant commercial parcels in Activity Centers 1, 4 and 20, which fall within the Market Area. Only one of those parcels is large enough (over 3 acres) to accommodate a self -storage facility of sufficient size (60,000) to be financially feasible and that parcel is owned by Sam's Club. Activity Center #1 FID PIN ACRES GIS O NAME1 LUSEDOR LUSEDOR D 13917 46690000908 1.41 COLOMBO ENTERPRISES 10 Vacant Commercial 162075 166440504 6.84 SAM'S EAST INC 10 Vacant Commercial Activity Center #4 FID PIN ACRES GIS O NAME1 LUSEDOR LUSEDOR D 4634 34595004066 1.59 MATHENEY TR, A GROVER 10 Vacant Commercial 16337 74979000206 0.22 STRAND PROFESSIONAL PRTNS INC 10 Vacant Commercial 95479 34595004040 1.79 JAZ AUTOMOTIVE PROPERTIES LLC 10 Vacant Commercial 112348 63944000543 0.46 BOTSKO PROPERTY VENTURES LLC 10 Vacant Commercial 162229 196800101 1.90 BLEND -ALL HOTEL DEV INC ET AL 10 Vacant Commercial 181342 63944000815 0.60 2570 NAPLES REALTY LLC 10 Vacant Commercial 181343 63944000747 0.26 2570 NAPLES REALTY LLC 10 Vacant Commercial Activity Center #20 FID PIN ACRES_GIS O_NAME1 LUSEDOR LUSEDOR_D 28988 75460680008 0.40 E POPPLEWELL REV TRUST 10 Vacant Commercial 151362 75460320009 0.20 TIARA REAL ESTATE CO LLC 10 Vacant Commercial Table 4 on the next page is the list of all Active PUDs with Remaining Undeveloped Commercial SQ. FT. in Collier County that fall within the 3-mile radius Market Area. Only 5 PUDs in the Market area have enough sufficient undeveloped commercial square footage remaining to accommodate a self -storage facility of 60,000+ square feet and only 2 have enough sufficient undeveloped commercial square footage remaining to accommodate a self -storage facility of 100,000 square feet. Real Estate Econometrics, Inc. 707 Orchid Drive Suite 100 Naples, FL 34102 www.ree-i.com rweyer(aD_ree-i.com (239) 269-1341 Packet Pg. 202 9.A.1.c TABLE 4. Subject Site 3-Mile Market Area Active PUDs with Undeveloped Commercial COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL FID NAME STATUS PETITION ORD_NUM TOTAL SQ. FT. DEV. SQFT UNDEV. SOFT 426 15501 OLD US 41 CPU ACTIVE PUDZ-PL2017-1083 18-08 40,000 0 40,000 139 BRB DEVELOPMENT ACTIVE PUD-2005- Jun-34 163,000 117,817 45,183 169 CARLTON LAKES ACTIVE R-87-36 99-75 70,000 65,415 4,58S 184 COLLIER HEALTH CENTER ACTIVE R-87-41 88-40 693,200 398,201 294,999 53 DONOVAN CENTER ACTIVE PUD-89-19(1) 97-73 250,000 237,000 13,000 442 GERMAIN IMMOKALEE CPUD ACTIVE PL20190000451 20-32 80,000 0 80,000 41 GERMAIN TOYOTA ACTIVE R-89-35 90-50 130,000 123,654 6,346 367 IMMOKALEE ROAD CENTER ACTIVE PUD-92-9 93-26 118,150 91,659 26,491 175 LAWMETKA PLAZA ACTIVE R-89-23 Feb-51 270,000 257,957 12,043 363 MEDITERRA ACTIVE PUD-99-0S(1) Jan-61 120,000 0 120,000 291 N.N. RESEARCH &TECHNOLOGY PK ACTIVE PUD-87-31(3) 26-Mar 0 122,674 0 445 NAPLES SENIOR CENTER CFPUD ACTIVE PL20180002622 20-51 30,000 0 30,000 49 NORTH NAPLES MEDICAL ACTIVE R-90-10 95-45 150,000 93,350 56,650 300 NORTHBROOKE PLAZA ACTIVE PUD-91-2(1) 98-59 270,000 220,845 49,155 321 PELICAN STRAND ACTIVE PUD-96-11(2) Feb-57 200,000 144,500 55,500 221 QUAIL II ACTIVE R-82-20 May-52 184,000 108,342 75,658 333 ROYAL PALM INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY ACTIVE PUD-2002- 03-54; 15-56 0 38,142 0 412 SOUTHBROOKE ACTIVE PUDZ-PL2014-2077 15-63 40,000 0 40,000 245 TWO LAKES PLAZA ACTIVE PUD-00-07 00-63 288,000 70,842 217,158 59 VETERANS PARK CENTER ACTIVE PUD-97-13(1) 22-Jan 40,000 25,422 14,578 TOTALS 3,330,950 2,424,577 1,181,346 Source: Collier County Growth Management Department and Consultant Real Estate Econometrics, Inc. 707 Orchid Drive Suite 100 Naples, FL 34102 www.ree-i.com rweyer(aD_ree-i.com (239) 269-1341 Packet Pg. 203 9.A.1.c APPENDIX A - 3-MILE RADIUS SUPPLY DETAIL I VA1921a.-Ifl MAP ID #2 Extra Space Storage I13CR Bopl.a Beach Rd SE BanRe Sptinps FL 34135 USA Q Search COMPLETED o E) COMPLE I ED •NCC • CC 69,083 Sq. Ft Open DOW ➢eaemha 2003 Ownership: E O soacE aRoeDan�a rno uc POaO%9O - -Contact: BOan Ge1Gmr Bonita Beach Self Storage 12721 Benue Bench Rd SE R—spnnga FL 34135 Um Q Search PLANNING PLANNING 64,659 Sq. Ft Expected Aarl 0611102O23 Date Epaxled Ofi/11 /2O2d CpmpleLge Date Ownership: ®mm Map Satellite 0Marcelo MaOunei .� a _ eenita Beach Rd SE Bonita Beoeh Rd SE 6 Ferrn Space S[orage Y ( ' 1 ael.ea.aP + { G.•gle. nak G— a.wwa�am. a.a enseretl wmk ,am. mu.. - raciay ]menhaden Oevebper Prcpaty Manapv RmLeble of anRY.:S NCCDnaa anal unna nere.ya �.� L.aal Rapra.Eon pale v 2pning Srn[us - Source: Radius Union ==C= PSI Map Satellite =ram�ngn island �1 r, r,a rr�t..;� 1 Flea Mgrket®r �MCGonaltl's� `a'"'' -. e'Honx Oepor Puna Super M-__sing Cburdr,Cgen BaneaUranae L'roeslnp® Ch� ryCfbh9 vasancoamrvcmaQ .. - Go::gle racmir mmrmar manem: aeraeper nennm n�a��,ai nrnnn ng4«gmema nranabie Aoyeay Mareger Aeatabk st , ..-. cc se �vnns ::a NCC VWe rma unna -eege L. Renwal on ❑ate .>PN Z4bing a1eNs Y Source: Radius Union pgedmrnn No docanrcMSPmilehle Packet Pg. 204 9.A.1.c MAP ID #3 MAP ID #4 Life Storage 177mT-l-Center DI 9nnaa Springs FL34135 USA O Search COMPLETED 00 COMPLETED • NCC e ec 79,480 Sq. Ft Open Date Jury 201 a Ownership: NSF TrMOE CFleTp PRWE Cr�Pll L P6 SO%32gD99 C. a I:c uilii i�u11�� avails LI- Patriot Star -All 1092B K Nlne Or 9DPIr9 SPrirrgs FL 34135 US q search COMPLETED ✓ 9L R,YLiOz DOMPLLr ED •NCC • CC 22,102 Sq. Ft Opeq D.w. O—W 1961 Ownership: NECKOSON NO01N45 LLC P494%2a8. a4N ETA SPNNbS. iL 3a133 C°nnct Map SateWle I, iq trade Center Dr Trace eenler0r Trade Cemer Pr Tra°ep ©Llr BorSst rags 9 0 v O4nvlruo-Master TF - - NMyers Octopus Remodeh v } Tm� 5h" Uevelapwenr9 _ Fxeiry mr9rma11pn ^ D9sammra rxvelgper Jgnnsgn aavelopmem assgnetes PraPCh'Managn [ Tr'II Cover Snee, Tcemahle SF T9AaP P ra4<•//era+eaiu;uramreanimecm,remaulell_ CC 9F a9,8TJ NOG 5F 19b41 lnle Enaenc,— OC-1 Nrv%+9w••nrle:ne.�.. :mnm�..s,re� NCC llnna -A -U acreage e.a feet PenMarbn Dale APN ft4a-02-0 —l9 v zoning saws IIIL Source: Radius Union V Map satellRe 'V- vPalriet Stor-AII 1 e KrrMa To 11,e n Br¢eze Mot yc�ee Exnllr EnrarrrwEan � Da��reenEa cevaooer Nnaanlx�avNlaeb RCpenY ManagC! Remabk Sr ],-P. NCC SF 6,51E cc wlte NCC VMS os�r I)Ms ,�reaga last Berwvallm Oale v 2gnlnq WNe v Source: Radius Union Packet Pg. 205 9.A.1.c MAP ID #5 11 F."Tia FBI;. Midgard Self Storage 15600 Old 41 N Naples FL 3411C USA a 9datcn COMPLETEO 0 ,c1e � Es. COMPLETED • NCC CC 70,438 Sq. Ft Open Date'. 0erember 1998 Ownership: MmGARD SELF STOP NAPLES 2LLG 1146 LANTONST canon: Marvin Tdvn Ace Super Storage 16300 old 41 N Naples FL 3411O usn q s ..h COMPLETED 00 COMPLETED • NCC • cc ^Map r Satellite long .,r a° a I {{{��yyy Nelghbad.xdT Midgard sett _ lbse.a.aonWe N 4mempaeyr T.aa. orwr Facilirylrtlunnatlen ^ _.,�n��..l-. 3Rvdopw No eocumems nvaflablc T,9perry Manager aemahle sE raA3e xsF e.Nw de.. NCC VN s T.W unna Ae.aage Last Aenm09n 0Me APN ZOnInA S1dN9 Source: Radius Union Map Satellite o- n cna,MaljO F[e Super S[9r�ge I �Nonh caN" c9n��-n • � ` Fxnlry lnamuneP n pocumenta aesanper NoeaeePlamanYanable RepertY Manager 50,091 Sq. Ft open Oate: Cecembev 19abG �,�, Ownership ''1O01N Tsug unda 0.LE GUPER ST6R4GE LLC apen9e �e E70 ATLANTIC — t� 1�nwatiM� pale Contan: ppN -_. Wllllmn Caralnl .. Zonmp splu�. Source: Radius Union Packet Pg. 206 9.A.1.c Public Storage 15aOD Cld 41 N Naples FL 34110 USA Q S-1, COMPLETED 4ZBR �, Pr COMPLETED /NCC / cc 52,842 Sq. Ft Open Dan: O—ber 1986 Owners hip: Pueuc sToluce INc Ptl BO%25025 canna Extra Space Storage 14600 OItl 41 N Naples FL 34110 USA Q S-1, COMPLETED 0 SAW a9 Ft COMPLETED •NCC / CC 36,684 Sq. Ft Open Date, Decemller 1986 Ownership: — SPACE PIIaPFRTI£S 1. LLC M OOk$00729 CaMaaa Map Satellite b Ooily plllcansv QFuhlit 5 rage GE Holw,re [omn + n G. gle a,eR.em a V-Haul RfaaMaFenwd M npvr# . m.ayWr Fxilily Informallen aeoamoyh live.ley Hodo—lanrellable P,,,W Nanpger lamahk sF 1,_I. .an. N. uId. TOWlum19 A[ N. I Laze Renovation D., .� �ecEeum_ v —m9 Status V Source: Radius Union =gym r- -T <w.tunaiwv Map Satellite Qn C •O� ExNa Space $[cirageQ I + Select Hame Amamalon r Go:q aul a..waw. v.,wm. ®ae-0 rsm.alu.a Fmlldy lnlormrlion — Dacumrnla CMdepey Ne decwnenle AraeaLle I§apMy Manegtt RCntable SF 1 H[C SF vafu cc unto NCC Velie TOEel Vmis A[ree9e lA9 NerlRVelan 081e PpN Zonfio Sn[us V V Source: Radius Union Packet Pg. 207 9.A.1.c 0 • MAP ID #10 Extra Space Storage 10550 G-di.11 1apk Rd Naples FL 34109 u3A q search COMPLETED 0 1 - 07 COMPLETED •NCI ♦ CG 115,824 Sq. Ft Open Date: ➢Member 2DO7 Ownership: TpgIL pO�LEVAPV L1P Day Pp 80%eG0]29 Conteck Od— The Lock Up Self Storage t025 Plpu SWd Naples FL341 TC USA C Search COMPLETED 0 COMPLETED •NCC • cc 80,883 Sq. Ft Ownership: LOCKUP EVERGREEN pEVELOPMENF 9p0 W FgpNTgGE F6 ConTaat N.. win„iidr.,�a, anihl�- wl ® ROM" rm ^^Map Satellite } �aroipgy n nm wnv % k � t�� WeFGr_o�P® r � Space 9o�.''ye(� Na;,las Houei nuia J Nonh Countywoccr y� Ne lamaupn Fa[nily FacmW wrarmauaa - p«,.ma.�r, pavNOpC Npdw,wm,M I,bk Prgpcnr ManapN TlemabN. 11541a CCSF a4h91 NCCSF CC Vn119 NCC VN19 pe V1ba quea9e feet penwa[lon pale APN zonmv stem: Source: Radius Union T.. Map Satellite Pearmp Den—V sus=a�eo u FI ma, De. rim._ Cartlinal.Mpv� The —k Up wfs- ge .naa..9.mrwr..n Ta91nW+pl9rmaupn — pnbbpn Aw>1l Menapr 8entable SF CC SF Ba4A� Ncc SF v cc unne Nccunna mlN u�ne acreage I Lau xen9ratwn pale v zonlnp sews � Source: Radius Union p9eummm Na aocwreme aauame Packet Pg. 208 9.A.1.c MAP ID #11 MAP ID #12 wl New Self Storage Facility $azauaapRBwar - ,- I . LWhIm, • Map saielllte I -— Neples L WILLOUGHBY }1 •Naples $p41a1® FL34109 usn ACRES it5acurny Offi' L saee m Tad. a seams PEfIMITTEU r�i,.m LW`N1Yrt 5YP¢r, 4n (Farge! �yoll�app ChfMmny t.i, Musa m of Nig1 .} C TYI _ L fTTTTTTiiiiiiP gGccer F —r eld p Ins z .1 � n.zmae.nermw w em.ofuee. ^ Fx1111Y InlarmatEon pocummu PERM[MD Ueuelepar saagaleoe.elop.u»i c; ,ul� N°d�am�ma naanamt Properly Mmager 60,000 Sq. Fl a°m°EI°s CC SF Expecaetl Start CLIW 01/OYr2020 NCC SF Cc unns �ppC, q 1Rl0112020 ncc unns Completion Date Total unlu ownership: ncreave R�a.i„pnpa,E APN Source: Radius Union Life Storage useppa wy i 5304 Useppawiy Mop Salelllle - Naples " FL341129 _ 4 USA !� J q search mm _ } 0 0 GG-gk COMPLETED • Nr,C rocnar lnroaaauaa p°�rmrala e Cc payvappr Johnson De .Pm PICI"M..W rma. FvitleneellHL 78,647 Sq. Ft RemabmsF Tapar CC 5F open DB May@Ula N. cF 9 CC unns Owrership. Nccumti ravel unaa JSF IiSEPPn wNY CMPII l[& Atredye oz amaa° La6I ranpvatmn pate Gaee05oott aonmp cams Source: Radius Union Packet Pg. 209 9.A.1.c APPENDIX B - 3-MILE RADIUS DEMOGRAPHICS DEMOGRAPHICS 2020 ThMe Area Population 4,307 1 Yr. Pop, Growth 8.7% 3 Yr. Pop, Growth IZ4% Pop. Density (people 1,564 per sq. mile) Households 17,403 Hcu sehdds With 2,262 13% Basements Renter Occupied 3,837 Mutti Family 7,4B3 43 Average Household $118.013 Income Median Household 88B,263 Income Per Capita income S48,545 median House Value 444,37U Household Size Z4 Selected Bleckgroup DemcgFapNcssuppli.ed by American Community 64 Source: Radius Union and U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey Packet Pg. 210 9.A.1.c Bill Planning— Execution — Rewlts,, Real Estate Econometrics, Inc. MEMORANDUM TO: Rachel Hansen Collier County Growth Management Department FROM: G. Russell Weyer President Real Estate Econometrics, Inc. SUBJECT: Response to PL 20220003325 Market Study Comments DATE: June 23, 2023 VIA: Email to Chris Scott — Peninsula Engineering Real Estate Econometrics, Inc. ("Consultant") has prepared the following response to the Collier County Staff comments letter to the Growth Management Plan Amendment Adoption PL 20220003225 — Livingston Road/Veteran's Memorial Boulevard Commercial Infill Subdistrict ("Subject Site"). 1. Please clarify if these potential commercial parcels from Table 4 are included in the supply/demand analysis as it is not currently clear if they were simply identified separately or included in the analysis. (Rest of page left intentionally blank) Real Estate Econometrics, Inc. 707 Orchid Drive Suite 100 Naples, FL 34102 www.ree-i.com rweyer(aD_ree-i.com (239) 269-1341 Packet Pg. 211 9.A.1.c TABLE 4. Subject Site 3-Mile Market Area Active PUDs with Undeveloped Commercial COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL FID NAME STATUS PETITION ORD_NUM TOTAL SQ. FT. DEV. SQFT UNDEV. SQFT 426 15501 OLD US 41 CPU ACTIVE PUDZ-PL2017-1083 18-08 40,000 0 40,000 139 BRB DEVELOPMENT ACTIVE PUD-2005- Jun-34 163,000 117,817 45,183 169 CARLTON LAKES ACTIVE R-87-36 99-75 70,000 65,415 4,585 184 COLLIER HEALTH CENTER ACTIVE R-87-41 88-40 693,200 398,201 294,999 53 DONOVAN CENTER ACTIVE PUD-89-19(1) 97-73 250,000 237,000 13,000 442 GERMAIN IMMOKALEE CPUD ACTIVE PL20190000451 20-32 80,000 0 80,000 41 GERMAIN TOYOTA ACTIVE R-89-35 90-50 130,000 123,654 6,346 367 IMMOKALEE ROAD CENTER ACTIVE PUD-92-9 93-26 118,150 91,659 26,491 175 LAWMETKA PLAZA ACTIVE R-89-23 Feb-51 270,000 257,957 12,043 363 MEDITERRA ACTIVE PUD-99-05(1) Jan-61 120,000 0 120,000 291 N.N. RESEARCH &TECHNOLOGY PK ACTIVE PUD-87-31(3) 26-Mar 0 122,674 0 445 NAPLES SENIOR CENTER CFPUD ACTIVE PL20180002622 20-51 30,000 0 30,000 49 NORTH NAPLES MEDICAL ACTIVE R-90-10 95-45 150,000 93,350 56,650 300 NORTHBROOKE PLAZA ACTIVE PUD-91-2(1) 98-59 270,000 220,845 49,155 321 PELICAN STRAND ACTIVE PUD-96-11(2) Feb-57 200,000 144,500 55,500 221 QUAIL II ACTIVE R-82-20 May-52 184,000 108,342 75,658 333 ROYAL PALM INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY ACTIVE PUD-2002- 03-54; 15-56 0 38,142 0 412 SOUTHBROOKE ACTIVE PUDZ-PL2014-2077 15-63 40,000 0 40,000 245 TWO LAKES PLAZA ACTIVE PUD-00-07 00-63 288,000 70,842 217,158 59 VETERANS PARK CENTER ACTIVE PUD-97-13(1) 22-Jan 40,000 25,422 14,578 TOTALS 3,330,950 2,424,577 1,181,346 Source: Collier County Growth Management Department and Consultant The parcels from the Collier County PUD list in Table 4 above were not included in the supply line of the supply/demand table. In order to first be included, the minimum square feet needed would be 100,000 square feet to be comparable to the Applicant's request. That requirement eliminates all but three of the parcels - Collier Health Center (FID 184): 294,999 Sq. Ft.; Two Lakes Plaza (FID 245): 217,158 Sq Ft.; and Mediterra (FID 363): 120,000 Sq. Ft. w !1!�!I■ !1l�Hl� ai!♦•olm IIIIIIIIIIIIININ 51amEtsmff■ mlHm!{!m!I � 'USCA11v PE=ERE � I W � CONrtiM AFAM ttlre aEDn- `. uKu11 4� +xoi aLn us wsr 2 _ 12 d TMN T'E �oow a L. TWGRT I PW[+ldnOES fiEl1EDER ON �Op� �T VLLAGE PULE E9TAE9 ,®„EpR� tiE861VE LCCOI\TLIFE � ��,� ENCLAVE RPIO Bi0' L COI PWN UY�S WIFGWS I�.innocns 3 7 Rvs ROGt MlY 16 PE CAN �n,� � M� Cff*APEI000 /S NpEPoAI ACJIF1BIt 10Ri1 M161� IfREiRlq .IOWIPIES �, MI A VAEV - Lacauruff Rn Rouse a Q W TARLWI sxN1AL 1 H r wp,a 1fj CEMER z ga J a 24 Z 15 �smun V 21 Y4pERgl,T 22 Rang PPERBL'A XAPIES J 1A8 d liF V11A9laY mCA0.1« � NiS1 MEY1H CCILIER CENRE! LEi]1G10FFICE �� 8i0 DEVELMEENT SYILLAUORBv 11411E5 PIAZA21 4 TRILt>2 SW PROF 'F"LTM ti#fOENS Ca11eRAL s. ~IMMOKALEE --J BLU 11i AVE canna. OAK a�si � � . i336 000 I Ir EWI� FauwF /I emRFv Li�E REGBn .i fig T Real Estate Econometrics, Inc. 707 Orchid Drive Suite 100 Naples, FL 34102 www.ree-i.com rweyer(D_ree-i.com (239) 269-1341 Packet Pg. 212 9.A.1.c The Consultant reviewed all three parcels and noted the following: 1. Collier Health Center — The Collier Health Center is located on the northeast corner of Immokalee Road at the Goodlette-Frank Road Intersection. According to Table 4, this PUD has 2 square feet of undeveloped space remaining. The aerial of the parcel below shows that the parcel is completely built out as a medical complex. There may be some acreage at the northern end of the parcel but that portion of the parcel is not feasible for self -storage due to access logistic issues and conformity to other uses already there so it was not included in the analysis. COLLIER HEALTH CENTER PUD 2. Two Lakes Plaza — The Two Lakes Plaza PUD is located on U.S. 41 North just north of the U.S, 41 — Old 41 Road intersection. According to Table 4, this PUD has 217,158 square feet of undeveloped space remaining. The aerial of the parcel on the next page indicates that the entire parcel is developed with the exception of the middle parcel. The middle parcel in the aerial is being developed as the Grand Living at Naples assisted living facility. The PUD has no further room for development so it was not included in the supply side of the analysis. Real Estate Econometrics, Inc. 707 Orchid Drive Suite 100 Naples, FL 34102 www.ree-i.com rweyer(cD_ree-i.com (239) 269-1341 Packet Pg. 213 NMI 4 { t _ V ._-._ .- - l: �.� � tom.•_. !' 1�'lll�i � ` [•'�: �'� 9.A.1.c The supply side of Table 3 from the report does not change since none of the PUD parcels identified have the capacity to develop 100,000 square feet of self -storage space in their current configuration. There will still be a deficit of 235,570 square feet of self-stoarge space in the Subject Property's market area at the 2033 horizon year. TABLE 3. Subject Site 3-Mile Market Area Self -Storage Supply/Demand Analysis 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 3-Mile Population 42,307 44,056 45,877 47,773 49,748 51,804 53,945 Demand per Capita 15.70 15.70 15.70 15.70 15.70 15.70 15.70 Demand 664,074 691,522 720,105 749,870 780,864 813,140 846,750 New Project(s) 0 0 0 64,659 60,000 100,000 0 Supply 664,074 664,074 664,074 728,733 788,733 888,733 888,733 Supply/(Defecit) 0 (27,448) (56,031) (21,137) 7,869 75,593 41,983 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 3-Mile Population 56,175 58,497 60,914 63,432 66,054 68,784 71,627 Demand per Capita 15.70 15.70 15.70 15.70 15.70 15.70 15.70 Demand 881,749 918,194 956,146 995,667 1,036,821 1,079,677 1,124,303 New Project(s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Supply 888,733 888,733 888,733 888,733 888,733 888,733 888,733 Supply/(Defecit) 6,984 (29,461) (67,413) (106,934) (148,088) (190,944) (235,570) Source: Radius Union, U.S. Census Bureau & Consultant Real Estate Econometrics, Inc. 707 Orchid Drive Suite 100 Naples, FL 34102 www.ree-i.com rweyer(a_ree-i.com (239) 269-1341 Packet Pg. 215 9.A.1.c TREBILCOCK CONSULTING SOLUTIONS Traffic Impact Statement Livingston Veterans Commercial Planned Unit Development Prepared for: Peninsula Engineering 2600 Golden Gate Parkway Naples, FL 34105 Phone: 239.403.6700 Collier County, Florida 1/23/2024 Prepared by: Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 2800 Davis Boulevard, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239.566.9551 Email: ntrebilcock@trebilcock.biz Collier County Transportation Methodology Fee — $ 500.00* Collier County Transportation Review Fee — Major Study Fee — $1,500.00* Note — *to be collected at time of first submittal Packet Pg. 216 9.A.1.c Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 Statement of Certification I certify that this Traffic Impact Statement has been prepared by me or under my immediate supervision and that I have experience and training in the field of Traffic and Transportation Engineering. %%"``,�!'TRF `e�' E NSF <c0 20' No 47116 0 STATE OF :4U Norman J. Trebilcock, AICP, PTOE, PE FL Registration No. 47116 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 2800 Davis Boulevard, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34104 Company Cert. of Auth. No. 27796 PRINTED COPIES OF THIS DOCUMENT ARE NOT CONSIDERED SIGNED AND SEALED AND THE SIGNATURE MUST BE VERIFIED ON ANY ELECTRONIC COPIES. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 2 Packet Pg. 217 9.A.1.c Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 Table of Contents ProjectDescription.......................................................................................................................................4 TripGeneration.............................................................................................................................................6 Trip Distribution and Assignment.................................................................................................................9 BackgroundTraffic......................................................................................................................................11 Existing and Future Roadway Network.......................................................................................................11 Project Traffic Impacts — Roadway Link Analysis........................................................................................13 SiteAccess Analysis.....................................................................................................................................14 ImprovementAnalysis................................................................................................................................16 Mitigationof Impact...................................................................................................................................16 Appendices Appendix A: Project Master Site Plan........................................................................................................ 17 Appendix B: Initial Meeting Checklist (Methodology Meeting).................................................................19 Appendix C: ITE Trip Generation Calculations...........................................................................................26 Appendix D: Veterans Memorial Boulevard Improvements.....................................................................54 Appendix E: Transportation Element Map TR - 5......................................................................................57 Appendix F: 2023 AUIR —TCMA Report — Northwest TCMA....................................................................59 Appendix G: Transportation Element Map TR - 7..................................................................................... 61 Appendix H: Transportation Element Map TR - 3.....................................................................................63 Appendix I: Access Management Policy —Table 1....................................................................................65 Appendix J: Turning Movements Exhibits.................................................................................................. 67 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 3 Packet Pg. 218 9.A.1.c Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 Project Description The Livingston Veterans project is a proposed commercial development located in the southeast quadrant of the intersection of Livingston Road (County Road 881) and Veterans Memorial Boulevard, in Collier County, Florida. The approximate location of the subject site is illustrated in Figure 1. The proposed master site plan is illustrated in Appendix A: Project Master Site Plan. Figure 1— Project Location Map + i Y cud ill �ol�® 14 1 & CourTry�6 ❑� ~ ' 9 3 Tahs Park GnU rlud s. q i �� ► ../� e r'� �f ti �. 'North NaPl�e�s� Golf CIu6�Middle SchooE JIm{erhal C n : �g rr r, !;Playa (;Olt Clutg filrgh� ti ® WILLOLIGHBY H, a'mkoon Inn afpAi ACRES Seed to Table � I a 1 �nmd+ren 's rds Clob I ` aE _ . W artSupercenter p — 1 j 1 I - } o GLIlsana Children %W f rtst Naples ctlMuseum OF ales N- (r .r Ti.:, Y. — North Col Reg al:IL quall ereek cc�pv club r V ha#t -rhe sirenif 1 ^` village ridtnr ii r } L ngSi Lake `i amm nit' etc GI' gTaiget r i _ Ai H� The subject project site is currently vacant. The site is currently zoned as A (Agriculture) and C-1 (Commercial Professional and General Office District). The development team requests to rezone the property to Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) to allow C-1 commercial uses. The purpose of this report is to document the transportation impacts associated with the proposed zoning application which requests to allow development of 50,000 square feet (sf) of commercial uses and 100,000 sf of indoor self -storage use. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 14 Packet Pg. 219 9.A.1.c Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 For traffic evaluation purposes, the project proposes 3 development scenarios: - Up to 6,000 square feet (sf) gas station with 12 fueling stations and a car wash, and 11,000 sf commercial center; or - Up to 6,000 sf gas station with 12 fueling stations and a car wash, and 80,000 sf indoor self -storage; or - Up to 50,000 sf of Shopping Center. This traffic report is in agreement with the latest adopted Collier County Traffic Impact Study (TIS) Guidelines and Procedures. The project provides the highest and best use scenario with respect to the project's proposed trip generation. Consistent with the recommendations illustrated in Collier County Traffic Impact Study Guidelines and Procedures, traffic generation associated with the proposed development is evaluated based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 11t" Edition and ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition. In agreement with the ITE Land Use Code (LUC) descriptions, the ITE land use designations are illustrated in Table 1. Table 1 Development Program Land Use [SIC Code in ITE Land Use Code Total Size brackets] Development Scenario 1 Commercial [All PUD permitted uses typical for a #822 —Strip Retail Plaza 11,000 square feet shopping center] Gas Station [5541] #945 — Convenience Store/Gas Station 12 fueling stations with Car Wash [7542] (6,000 square feet) Development Scenario 2 Indoor Self -Storage [4225] #151— Mini -Warehouse 80,000 square feet Gas Station [5541] #945 —Convenience Store/Gas Station 12 fueling stations with Car Wash [7542] (6,000 square feet) Development Scenario 3 Commercial [All PUD permitted uses typical for a #821— Shopping Plaza (40-150k) 50,000 square feet shopping center] In order to provide more flexibility, the development will have the ability to adjust proposed parameters by converting the proposed commercial uses, subject to size and trip cap limitations, as applicable. For the purposes of this analysis, the traffic planning horizon year is assumed to be 2028. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 5 Packet Pg. 220 9.A.1.c Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 A methodology memorandum was transmitted via email to the Collier County Transportation Review staff on December 8, 2022. For details refer to Appendix B: Initial Meeting Checklist (Methodology Meeting). The project proposes one connection to Livingston Road and one access on Veterans Memorial Boulevard. In addition, a vehicular interconnect is proposed to the adjacent residential development to the east. Trip Generation The software program OTISS (Online Traffic Impact Study Software, most current version) is used to evaluate the projected trip generation for the project. The ITE equations and/or rates are used for the trip generation calculations, as applicable. The ITE — OTISS trip generation calculation worksheets are provided in Appendix C: ITE Trip Generation Calculations. Gas Station Traffic Comparison Gas Station land use — a trip generation comparison is provided between the available ITE land use variables: convenience store square footage and number of vehicle fueling positions (refer to Appendix C). The convenience store square footage generates the highest traffic impact and it is utilized for the purposes of this report. Car Wash Land Use A car wash facility is proposed as an additional service provided by the gas station. Based on established transportation practices which relate to gas station facilities, the traffic generated by the car wash is considered incidental to the traffic generated by the gas station land use. Internal Trip Capture The internal capture accounts for a reduction in external traffic because of the interaction between the multiple land uses in a site. Although it is expected that some trips between the proposed on -site land uses will be made without travel on the off -site street system (internal capture), per ITE latest recommendations the internal capture is conservatively not considered for this analysis. Pass -by Trips The pass -by trips account for traffic that is already on the external roadway network and stops at the project on the way to a primary trip destination. It should be noted that the driveway volumes are not reduced as a result of the pass -by reduction, only the traffic added to the surrounding streets and intersections. As such, pass -by trips are not deducted for operational turn lane analysis (all external traffic is accounted for). Based on the information illustrated in the ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition pass -by capture for Shopping Centers is 34% for PM peak hour traffic. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 6 Packet Pg. 221 9.A.1.c Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 Per Collier County TIS Guidelines and Procedures, the pass -by capture for Shopping Centers should not exceed 25% for the peak hour traffic and the daily capture rate should be assumed to be 10% lower than the peak hour capture rate. Consistent with a conservative approach, this analysis calculates pass -by trip percentages for Shopping Centers as follows: AM/PM peak hour rates at 25% and the daily capture rates at 15%. Consistent with the recommendations illustrated in the ITE Trip Generation Handbook and Collier County TIS Guidelines and Procedures, the pass -by capture rate for Gasoline Stations with and without Convenience Store should not exceed 50% for the peak hour traffic. For the purposes of this analysis the pass -by trip capture rate for the proposed Gas Station is considered as follows: AM/PM peak hour rates at 50% and the daily capture rates at 40%. Per FDOT's (Florida Department of Transportation) Site Impact Handbook (Section 2.4.4) the number of pass -by trips should not exceed 10% of the adjacent street traffic. The FDOT presents this factor as a measure of reasonableness and illustrates that it is a rule -of -thumb and not a statistically studied factor. The Livingston Road segment from Imperial Street to Immokalee Road (Collier County Link ID #51) is the monitored roadway link directly accessed by the project traffic. The 2022 peak hour, peak direction traffic volume for this roadway segment is 1,820 vehicles per hour (vph) as illustrated in the 2022 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR). The project is estimated to generate 93 peak hour, peak direction pass -by trips (Proposed Scenario 1 — highest traffic impact) which represent approximately 5% of the adjacent street traffic. Trip Generation Projections The estimated trip generation associated with the proposed development scenarios are illustrated in Tables 2A, 2B and 2C. Detailed calculations can be found in Appendix C: ITE Trip Generation Calculations. Collier County's Concurrency Management System is intended to ensure that there is adequate roadway capacity available to serve current and future development. Transportation Concurrency is a measure of the capacity of the roadway system to support the adopted level of service for vehicular traffic. As part of the Transportation Element, the County established minimum acceptable level of service standards on the existing highway system. For County facilities, the level of service standard is measured on a peak hour basis. In agreement with the Collier County TIS Guidelines and Procedures, significantly impacted roadways are identified based on the proposed project highest peak hour trip generation and consistent with the peak hour of the adjacent street traffic. Based on the information contained in Collier County 2022 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR), the peak hour for adjacent roadway network is PM. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 17 Packet Pg. 222 9.A.1.c Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 Table 2A Trip Generation — Proposed Scenario 1— Average Weekday Development Weekday AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ITE Land Use Size (2-way) Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Strip Retail Plaza 11,000 square feet 599 16 10 26 42 41 83 Convenience Store/Gas Station 6,000 square feet 4,203 170 169 339 164 163 327 Total 4,802 186 179 365 206 204 410 Internal Capture 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 External Traffic 4,802 186 179 365 206 204 410 Pass -by Traffic 1,771 89 88 177 92 93 185 Net External Traffic 3,031 97 91 188 114 1 111 1 225 Table 2B Trip Generation — Proposed Scenario 2 — Average Weekday Development Weekday AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ITE Land Use Size (2-way) Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Mini -Warehouse 80,000 square feet 116 4 3 7 6 6 12 Convenience Store/Gas Station 6,000 square feet 4,203 170 169 339 164 163 327 Total 4,319 174 172 346 170 169 339 Internal Capture 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 External Traffic 4,319 174 172 346 170 169 339 Pass -by Traffic 1,681 85 85 170 82 82 164 Net External Traffic 2,638 89 87 176 88 87 175 Table 2C Trip Generation — Proposed Scenario 3 — Average Weekday Development Weekday AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ITE Land Use Size 50,000 square feet (2-way) Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Shopping Plaza (40-150k) 3,376 54 33 87 127 133 260 Total 3,376 54 33 87 127 133 260 Internal Capture 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 External Traffic 3,376 54 33 87 127 133 260 Pass -by Traffic 506 14 8 22 32 33 65 Net External Traffic 2,870 1 40 25 1 65 1 95 1 100 1 195 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 18 Packet Pg. 223 9.A.1.c Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 Based on the traffic data illustrated in Tables 2A, 2B and 2C, the proposed Scenario 1 development (Table 2A) provides the highest transportation impact and it is conservatively utilized for the purposes of this analysis. The surrounding roadway network concurrency analysis is analyzed based on projected PM peak hour net external traffic generated by the project (refer to Table 2A). The site access analysis is evaluated based on projected external traffic during the weekday AM and PM peak hour (proposed Scenario 1). Based on the data illustrated in Table 2A, the estimated PM peak hour directional trips (Enter and Exit traffic) are more intensive than the AM peak hour directional trips, and are conservatively utilized for the purposes of the site access analysis. Trip Distribution and Assignment The traffic generated by the development is assigned to the adjacent roadway network based on the knowledge of the area, the existing transportation network, the location of the subject project, engineering judgment and consistent with the transportation methodology (Appendix B). The site -generated trip distribution is shown in Table 3, Project Traffic Distribution for Peak Hour and is graphically depicted in Figure 2 — Project Distribution by Percentage and by PM Peak Hour. Table 3 Project Traffic Distribution for Peak Hour Distribution PM Peak Hr Project Roadway Link CC AUIR Roadway Link Location of Project Traffic Vol.* Link ID # Enter Exit Traffic Livingston Rd 51.0 Imperial St to Veterans Memorial Blvd 41% SB — 47 NB — 45 Livingston Rd 51.0 Veterans Memorial Blvd to Immokalee Rd 51% NB — 58 SB — 57 Veterans N/A East of Livingston Rd 8% WB — 9 EB — 9 Memorial Blvd** Note(s): * Peak hour, peak direction traffic volumes are underlined and bold to be used in Roadway Link Level of Service calculations; peak hour, peak direction per 2023 Annual Update and Inventory Report. **Not a Collier County monitored roadway. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 19 Packet Pg. 224 9.A.1.c Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 Figure 2 — Project Distribution by Percentage and by PM Peak Hour � pliall'i�fzstGollri ❑� S Cou'niiy club `y y " Talfs Park bolt Cub PROJECT TRIP t t iv DISTRIBUTION BY = PERCENTAGE < 4uaklCTeek. Cn IT Im�eda€ Golf CIo6Middle Schoo rJ�a� nt Cutr � r �777� •� '�� Cuh_;a[TheS{ran�� ^`' 1 r .Oua ll 9e villa Creek` �— o ndav 'S�on e=C3 Neva f n i R r-.'ngshere ake ;l�ePleya Goft Cluh I �� {, i I `Eomm Pith IWI BY ACRES . —n I A ap sd- r atc Seed to Tbletk e�r a •rffs club mWa+art Sup� RG. I 13., + —I GPI -nano Childrens� • r j ri�r+aples Ncso�iei�d�ge iN7useum uF aples w Arrow Hl ( ¢ NorthC lae 11 +� � t ..,. I I Reg P:9n: Jail"i gulf f CounS'ry Club ``jj c SB47 :v. �, ✓ PROJECT TRIP t NB 45 r—p ❑ISTRIBUTION BY R _ s UV6 9 i PM PEAK HOUR EB9 _ Ni rti i �.� 4uall ETeek.� �odh Naples JJ" Ca�Intr�}r Cluh Im{erlaf Golf Ch6 Middle Schoo 71 SB 57 N, C uti;at The Strarij r NB 58 L �ouail Creek village o.nd�l)an ��,+'+[ �� ■ Lngsht�re ake 0oli.Clu`6f� 7 _ �, I I `Commnll WI ACRES BY w_am'p�on lnapUatc e W,@'s N®I` Seed to Table �y t a � _ Immektln xtl— Immokd eFd' � I. Vm'c CIu6� g Wal art Supercent iargef f 7 --� Irl ana Children ` • r.� �I r1h Naples 06119hPdge � �, useum of aple VIP. - ArroWH Nodh CollinRego ai Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA n - - - 1 10 Packet Pg. 225 9.A.1.c Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 Background Traffic The existing traffic conditions are extracted from the 2023 AUIR. Average background traffic growth rates were estimated for the segments of the roadway network in the study area using the Collier County Traffic Impact Study Guidelines and Procedures recommendation of a minimum 2% growth rate, or the historical growth rate evaluated based on the annual peak hour, peak direction traffic volume (estimated from 2008 through 2023 as illustrated in AUIR), whichever is greater. Another way to derive the background traffic is to use the 2023 AUIR volume plus the trip bank volume. Table 4, Background Traffic without Project, illustrates the application of projected growth rates to generate the projected background (without project) peak hour peak direction traffic volume for the future horizon year 2028. Table 4 Background Traffic without Project (2023 - 2028) 2028 Projected 2028 Projected 2023 AUIR Projected Pk Hr, Peak Dir Pk Hr, Peak Dir cc Pk Hr, Pk Dir Traffic Background Background Roadway AUIR Roadway Link Background Annual Growth Traffic Volume Trip Traffic Volume Link Link Location Traffic Growth Factor w/out Project Bank ID # Volume Rate (trips/hr) w/out Project (tripsTrip (trips/hr) (%/yr)* Growth Bank*** Factor** Imperial St to Livingston Rd 51.0 Veterans 1,600 2.92% 1.1548 1,848 203 1,803 Memorial Blvd Livingston Veterans Rd 51.0 Memorial Blvd to 1,600 2.92% 1.1548 1,848 203 1,803 Immokalee Rd Note(s): * Annual Growth Rate — estimated for 2008-2023 peak hour, peak direction traffic volumes, or 2% minimum. ** Growth Factor = (1 + Annual Growth Rate)5. 2028 Projected Volume = 2023 AUIR Volume x Growth Factor. *** 2028 Projected Volume = 2023 AUIR Volume +Trip Bank. The projected 2028 Peak Hour — Peak Direction Background Traffic is the greater of the Growth Factor or Trip Bank calculation, which is underlined and bold as applicable. Existing and Future Roadway Network The existing roadway conditions are extracted from the 2023 Annual Update and Inventory Report. Roadway improvements that are currently under construction or are scheduled to be constructed within the five-year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) or Capital Improvement program (CIP) are considered to be committed improvements. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 11 Packet Pg. 226 9.A.1.c Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 As no such improvements were identified in the Collier County Five -Year Work Program (FY2024- FY2028), the evaluated roadway segments are anticipated to remain as such through project build -out (2028 planning horizon year). The existing and future roadway conditions are illustrated in Table 5, Existing and Future Roadway Conditions. Table 5 Existing and Future Roadway Conditions CC 2023 Peak 2028 Peak Roadway AUIR Roadway Link 2023 2023 Hr, Peak Dir 2028 2028 Hr. Peak Dir Roadway Standard Roadway Standard Link Link Location Capacity Capacity ID # Conditions LOS Volume Conditions LOS Volume Imperial St to Livingston 51.0 Veterans 6/4D D 3,000 (NB) 6/4D D 3,000 (NB) Rd Memorial Blvd Livingston Veterans 51.0 Memorial Blvd to 6/4D D 3,000 (NB) 6/4D D 3,000 (NB) Rd Immokalee Rd Note(s): 2U = 2-lane undivided roadway; 4D, 6D, 8D = 4-lane, 6-lane, 8-lane divided roadway, respectively; LOS = Level of Service. Veterans Memorial Boulevard Extension With potential impact to the study network, the adopted Collier County Five -Year Work Program depicts Veterans Memorial Boulevard Extension Phase 1 and Phase 2 as committed improvements. Phase 1 of this project will extend Veterans Memorial Boulevard from the intersection with Livingston Road to the east entrance of the newly planned high school. In Phase 2 the roadway will be further extended to Old US41 and potentially through to US41 (subject to a study by the Florida Department of Transportation). This will be a 4-lane divided urban roadway with traffic signals, concrete sidewalks and on -street bike lanes. Construction for Phase 1 commenced in January 2021. Part of this phase, the traffic signal at the intersection of Livingston Road and Veterans Memorial Blvd will be upgraded, and two new signalized intersections will be installed, one at Veterans Memorial Elementary school and one at the future high school. Phase 1 of this project was completed in 2023. Consistent with the approved construction plans for Phase 1, a two-lane median divided section is provided on the Veterans Memorial Boulevard segment located immediately east of its intersection with Livingston Road. The approved project phases and proposed improvements on Veterans Memorial Boulevard in the vicinity of proposed Livingston Veterans Commercial project are depicted in Appendix D: Veterans Memorial Blvd Improvements. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 12 Packet Pg. 227 9.A.1.c Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 Project Traffic Impacts - Roadway Link Analysis The Collier County Transportation Planning Services developed Level of Service (LOS) volumes for the roadway links impacted by the project, which were evaluated to determine the project impacts to the area roadway network in the future. In agreement with Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) requirements (LDC Section 6.02.02), a project is considered to have a significant and adverse impact if both the percentage volume capacity exceeds 2% of the capacity for the link directly accessed by the project and for the link adjacent to the link directly accessed by the project; 3% for other subsequent links and if the roadway is projected to operate below the adopted LOS standard. Based on these criteria, this project does not create any significant and adverse impacts to the area roadway network. None of the analyzed links are projected to operate below the adopted LOS standard with or without the project at 2028 future build -out conditions. Table 6, Roadway Link Level of Service illustrates the LOS impacts of the project on the area roadway network. Table 6 Roadway Link Level of Service (LOS) — With Project in the Year 2028 2028 Peak 2028 Roadway Min LOS Min LOS CC Peak Hr, Link, Peak Hr, Peak , Volume exceeded exceeded Roadway AUIR Roadway Link Dir Capacity Link Link Location Peak Dir Dir, Peak Hr Volume Impact without with ID # Capacity (Project Vol w/Project by Project? Project? Volume Added) * Yes/No Yes/No ** Project Imperial St to Livingston 51.0 Veterans Memorial 3,000 NB-45 1,893 0 1.5/o No No Rd (NB) Blvd Veterans Memorial Livingston 51.0 Blvd to Immokalee 3,000 NB-58 1,906 0 1.9/o No No Rd (NB) Rd Note(s): *Refer to Table 3 from this report. **2028 Projected Volume = 2028 background (refer to Table 4) + Project Volume Added. As illustrated in Collier County LDC Chapter 6.02.02 — M. 2, once traffic from a development has been shown to be less than significant on any segment using Collier County TIS significance criterion, the development's impacts are not required to be analyzed further on any additional segments. Northwest Transportation Concurrency Management Area The analyzed roadway links are located within the Northwest Transportation Concurrency Management Area (TCMA). The TCMAs designation is provided in Policy 5.6 of the Transportation Element — Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP). Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 13 Packet Pg. 228 9.A.1.c Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 The Northwest TCMA is illustrated in GMP Transportation Element Map TR-5 as depicted in Appendix E: Transportation Element Map TR-5. In agreement with Policy 5.7 of the Transportation Element, the TCMA concurrency is measured on a system -wide basis such that each TCMA shall maintain 85% of its lane miles at or above the LOS standards. Based on the information contained in 2023 AUIR, the Northwest TCMA percent lane miles meeting standard is 94.0%. Refer to Appendix F: 2023 AUIR —TCMA Report —Northwest TCMA. As illustrated in the Policy 5.8, transportation mitigation may be required when the proposed development will impact either a constrained roadway link and/or a deficient roadway link within a TCMA as determined in the most current Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR), by more than a de minimis amount (more than 1% of the maximum service volume at the adopted LOS), yet continue to maintain the established percentage of lanes miles indicated in Policy 5.7 of the GMP Transportation Element. Based on the traffic projections illustrated Table 6, the impacted roadway network meets the Collier County transportation concurrency requirements. In addition, the TCMA concurrency (percent lane miles meeting standard) for the affected roadway segments is adequate. It is noted that no impact will be de minimis if it exceeds the adopted LOS standard of any affected designated hurricane evacuation routes within a TCMA. Any adverse impact to a hurricane evacuation route within a TCMA shall require a proportionate share congestion mitigation payment provided the remaining LOS requirements of the TCMA are maintained (GMP Transportation Element Policy 5.8.d). Livingston Road is a designated hurricane evacuation route and it is projected to perform within the adopted LOS standard. The Collier County hurricane evacuation routes are illustrated in GMP Transportation Element Map TR-7. Refer to Appendix G: Transportation Element Map TR-7. Site Access Analysis The project proposes one connection to Livingston Road and one access on Veterans Memorial Boulevard. In addition, a vehicular interconnect is proposed to the adjacent residential development to the east. For more details refer to Appendix A: Project Master Site Plan. Traffic Evaluation The site access is evaluated based on projected external traffic during the weekday AM and PM peak hour (proposed Scenario 1 — highest traffic impact). The project estimated traffic is illustrated in Table 2A and Appendix C: ITE Trip Generation Calculations of this report. Based on the data illustrated in Table 2A, the estimated PM peak hour directional trips (Enter traffic 206 vph and Exit traffic 204 vph) are more intensive than the AM peak hour directional trips, and are conservatively utilized for the purposes of the site access analysis. Access Management Policy Collier County's roadway network is comprised of State, County, City and privately maintained roadways. Roadways are generally classified as Arterial, Collector, or Local. Access management is the Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 14 Packet Pg. 229 9.A.1.c Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 design of access between roadways and land development. It promotes the efficient and safe movement of people and goods by reducing conflicts on the roadway system. The latest adopted Access Management Policy for Collier County is depicted in Resolution No. 13-257, as amended. The Livingston Road segment from Immokalee Road to Imperial Street (Collier County 2022 AUIR ID #51.0) and the Veterans Memorial Boulevard segment located east of Livingston Road are the roadway facilities accessed directly by the project. As illustrated in the Collier County Capital Improvement Element — Transportation Element Map TR - 3 (Federal Functional Classification/Urban Boundaries — Collier County), the subject Livingston Road segment is designated as an arterial facility. Refer to Appendix H: Transportation Element Map TR - 3. The Livingston Road (CR 881) segment from Immokalee Road to Imperial Street is currently a north - south 6-lane divided roadway under Collier County jurisdiction and has a posted legal speed of 45 mph in the vicinity of the project. A review of Collier County Access Management Policy guidelines shows that for a Class 3 roadway, the established access management criteria are as follow: 660 feet minimum connection spacing; 660 feet directional median opening; 1,320 feet full median opening; and 2,640 feet (0.5 mi) signal spacing. Refer to Appendix I: Access Management Policy — Tablel. Based on our review of the proposed connection spacing, this access exceeds the adopted minimum connection spacing standards for a Class 3 roadway. As such, the proposed access on Livingston Road meets the adopted standards for a right-in/right-out connection. In addition, a directional median opening meets or exceeds the adopted directional median opening spacing standards for a Class 3 roadway. As such, a directional median opening may be allowed at this location. The Veterans Memorial Boulevard segment located east of its intersection with Livingston Road is planned as a 2-lane divided roadway under Collier County jurisdiction and has a posted legal speed of 35 mph in the vicinity of the project. The established access management criteria for a Class 5 facility are as follow: 220 feet minimum connection spacing; 440 feet directional median opening; 660 feet full median opening; and 1,320 feet (0.25 mi) signal spacing. Refer to Appendix I. Based on our review of the proposed connection spacing, the proposed access on Veterans memorial Boulevard meets the adopted standards for a right-in/right-out connection. Turn lane warrants Required turn lane improvements are considered site related. As illustrated in the Collier County Construction Standards Handbook for Work within the Right -Of -Way, Section III, if existing County ROW is utilized for these improvements, compensating ROW must be provided. The project accesses are evaluated for turn lane warrants based on the Collier County Construction Standards Handbook: (a) two-lane roadways — 40vph for right -turn lane/20vph for left -turn lane; (b) Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 15 Packet Pg. 230 9.A.1.c Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 multi -lane divided roadways — right -turn lanes shall always be provided; and (c) when new median openings are permitted, they shall always include left -turn lanes. The assignment of the PM peak hour trips anticipated at the proposed site access locations is depicted in Appendix J: Turning Movements Exhibits. A dedicated northbound right -turn lane and an exclusive southbound left -turn lane (provided a directional median opening is permitted) are warranted at the Livingston Road access location based on the multi -lane roadway criterion. The left -in directional median opening on Livingston Road will be evaluated for denial or approval at the time of site development permitting. In addition, a dedicated eastbound right -turn lane is warranted at the proposed access located on Veterans Memorial Boulevard as the projected traffic exceeds the right -turn threshold volume criterion (refer to Appendix J). A detailed evaluation of applicable access points will be performed at the time of site development permitting/platting to determine traffic operational requirements, as more accurate parameters will be made available. Improvement Analysis The concurrency analysis determined that the proposed project is not a significant and adverse traffic generator for the roadway network at this location. There is adequate and sufficient roadway capacity to accommodate the proposed development without adversely affecting adjacent roadway network level of service. Based upon the results of the turn lane analysis performed within this report, turn lane improvements are warranted at the proposed project access locations. Mitigation of Impact The developer proposes to pay the appropriate Collier County Road Impact Fee as building permits are issued for the project. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 16 Packet Pg. 231 9.A.1.c Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 Appendix A: Project Master Site Plan Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 17 Packet Pg. 232 Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 9.A.1.c VETERANS MEMORIAL PARKWAY (PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY) RIGHT IN / RIGHT OUT ACCESS POINT . - � 15'TVPE'D' O LANDSCAPE BUFFER 01 VEH ICU LAR/PEDEST R IAN INTER -CONNECT 1 I— p Q Q Q Q Q i Ir LL O W z� �= I 2ia- 0� rll2 Q0 N O J Efl - ~ � q J z m a },�, 15'TYPE'D' I' LANDSCAPEBUFFER � J W p POTENTIAL TdTERNP.L LOT LINE Z _j Z LU Q O � N z LU Q U) J LLI 15' TYPE'B' LANDSCAPE BUFFER C 10 �n LEGEND DEVIATION b C COMMERCIAL a Ej - WATER 1sTrPE'B' MANAGEMENT LANDSCAPE BUFFER INTERNAL ZONING: RPUD ACCESS POINT I LAND USE: MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT <C)oo EXTERNAL ACCESS POINT Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 18 Packet Pg. 233 9.A.1.c Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 Appendix B: Initial Meeting Checklist (Methodology Meeting) Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 19 Packet Pg. 234 9.A.1.c Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 Suggestion: Use this Appendix as a worksheet to ensure that no important elements are overlixiked. C'rr>.ss out the items that do not apply, or NIA (nut applicahle). Dale: December 8, 2022 Time: NIA Location: NI,,I Via Ctnail Peunle Attendute: Name, Organization, and •Telephone Numbers 1) Michael Sa«ryar. Collier Counly Growth Management Division 2) Norntmi Trebilcock. TCS 3) Cinrian Malacscu,'rCS Study Preparer: Prep arer's Name and 'Title: Norman Trebilcock, 4JCP. PTOE, PE Organization: Trcbilcock Consulting Solution,,, PA Address & Telephone Number: 2800 Davis Boulevard, Suito 200, Naples, Fl, 34104: ph 239-566-9551 I tniorwer(s): Rcvie.w cr's Name & Title' Michael Sawyer, Proicct illanagcr Organization: Collier County Transport alinn Plimning Department Telephone Number: 239-252-2926 Applicant: Applicant's Name: Peninsula Engineering Address: 2600 Golden Gate Parkway_ Naples. Fl 34105 Telephone Number: 239-403-6700 Proposed Development: Name: Livingston Veterans —CPLrD Rezone Location: Southeast quadrant of the intersection of Livingston Road (CR 881) and Veterans Memorial Boulevard, in Nanlcs refer to hie. 1 Land Use Type: Commercial ITE Code #: Varies — per ITC Trip Generation Manual (TGM). I Ith Edition Description: The subject protect is currently vacant land. 'lie request is to rezone the property frorn C-1 and A to CPU1) to allow- C-i c❑mmenr ial uses. 'Ilic proposed intensity is 50.(H)Osf of commercial and 100,000 sf sell -storage, For trailic analysis Pum❑scs, the project proposes 3 development concepts: - L'p to 6.000 sf gas station wiilr 12 fueling stations {fss) and a car wash and 11.000 srconumercial center: or - i �p to 6,000 sf gas station with 12 fs and a car wash and 80,000 sr ind❑❑r sa:lf- storage Page 1 of 6 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 20 Packet Pg. 235 9.A.1.c Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 - Up to 50,000 sf Shopping Center. The proiect proposes one connection on Livingston Road WR 881) and one access on Veterans Memorial Boulevard. Figure 1— Project Location Map Ir �� s Tell�r�xcdnm� YeuaX�+ra&r�nl, L gshnrr 1FeFk �// � 1)1}iiFVVlls _ 9. � � �1nero Cn�rmcn• � i �Nxeeum nr aplr�r+ � - - � F � r�nnr cnA .I_ Zorm Existing: C1 and Comprehensive plan recorrunendation: NIA Requested: approval for development Findings of the Preliminary Study: Study tvne: Since estimated net new nroiect traffic is greater than 100 two-way peak hour taps, this study qualifies for a Maior TIS. The TIS will evaluate the highest and best use scenario for the site: Scenario 1 — 6,000sf/12 fs gas station with car wash and 11,000sf shopping center Scenario 2 — 6,000sf112 fs gas station with car wash and 80,000 indoor self -storage facili Scenario 3 — 50,000 sf shopping center The traffic report will determine a tap cap associated with the proposed highest and best use. The TIS will be consistent with Collier TIS will be consistent with Collier Coun�TlS Guidelines and Procedures Guidelines and Procedures. Page 2 of 6 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 21 Packet Pg. 236 Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 9.A.1.c Trip Generation — ITE Trip Generation Manual (TGM), I V I k Edition: intental capture vid pass-bv rates are considered consistent with fl_E and CC '11S (it iidelines. Internal C apttne — conservatively, no internal capture i5 considered, Pass -by Reduction per ITT and CC 7I5 Guidelines -Shunning CcnhLr Dail%, 15P�, .111i and PM — 2510: Gas Station - Daily 409y. A.M and P-M — 509,6: nlayimuin 10% of adjacent street traffic [AMR 2022 — Livingston Rd segunent adjacent to project. Peal: hour peak direction Volume = 1,820 Irph; 10°b maximum = 182 vFh]. Gas Station —Trip tencration comparison betwcc:t conncniencc »>arkct square i[iotaQL' and number of fueling stations. Car Wash — Consistent with generally accepted practice. traffic generated by the Car Wash land use is considered ineidental to die proposed Gas Station land use. Roadway concurrency analysis based on estimated net external PM peak hour traffic. The Proposed dcvcinflmcnt is situated within the Caurtt,•'s designatod Northwest Transportation ConcurrencN- Management Area (MMA). The TCMA designation is provided in Policy 5.6 of the Transportation Element — Collier Cou»ty Gro«ih hlanagentcnt Plan [CINIP]. Site Access — Eya]tlate access restrictions based on current Access Management Policy. Study Type: (il'not net inemase_ operati❑na] study) Small Scale '['IS ❑ Minor TIS ❑ Milior '11% Study Area: Boundaries: Adjacent streets —Livingston Rd: Veterans Memorial Blvd Additional intersections to be analNzed: NiA Build Out Year: 2027 Planning Horizon Year: 2027 Analysis Time Period(s): LOS - Pi4I Peak Hour: Access — AMIPM Peak Hour Future Off -Site Developments: WA Source of Trip Generation Rates: I'I'F.'I'rip ireneration Nfanual ['I'G1Gi], 1 ]'h Edition Reductions in Trip Generation Rates: None: NIA Pass -by trips: Based on 1Tli and C❑lIior Cowity'1'IS Guidelines Internal trips (MPUD): Based on ITE and Collier County TIS Guidelines Transit use: N/A Other: NIA Hoiixon Year Roadwav 1Set%vork I ni p roy ements: 2027 Page 3 of 6 m a Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 122 Packet Pg. 237 9.A.1.c Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 MethodoloZy & Assumptions: Non -site traffic estimates: Collier Countytraffic counts and 2022 AUIR Site -trip generation: OTISS — ITE TGM, 11"' Edition Trip distribution method Engineer's Estimate —refer to Figure 2 Traffic assignment method: Engineer's Estimate Traffic growth rate: historical growth rate or 2% minimum Turning Movement Assignment: Engineer's Estimate — 51 % at Livingston Rd access and 45% at Veterans Memorial Blvd access, 4% - via interconnect with Allura residential development. Figure 2— Project Trip Distribution by Percentage P F' r e_ . __ ' WILLOUGHBY ACRE$ ©r.. Seed to 1 av a N❑1 ® PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION BY PERCENTAGE CoomV yin Ouad meek ©� �z o ui�at me sjrantlf t " � 1 Y:'agef dQ6fjaa 4 1 r � L q,htlre Lane l • ' . C=Vke r i�f o arc Q r A 1 .---.mw-.�..ie�'( artSummerder ft 07xpl : r � l}} w r ]Ygano cnu of aplesples .4rraw I ' I r4arih Call T tteMaN P I. .. Page 4 of 6 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P A P e 1 23 Packet Pg. 238 9.A.1.c Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 Special Features: (from preliminary study or prior experience) Accidents locations: N/A Sight distance: N/A Queuing: N/A Access location & configuration: N/A Traffic control: MUTCD Signal system location & progression needs: NIA On -site parking needs: N/A Data Sources: CC 2022 AUIR: most current CC Traffic Counts Base maps: NIA Prior study reports: N/A Access policy and jurisdiction: N/A Review process: N/A Requirements: NIA Miscellaneous: N/A Small Scale Study —No Fee Minor Study - $750.00 Major Study - $1,500.00 A Methodology Fee $500 X Includes 0 intersections Additional Intersections - $500.00 each `lll fees will be agreed to during the Methodologi, meeting and must be paid to Transportation prior to our sign-offon the applieation. SIGNATURES Normaw Tre&r'ocf2 Study Preparer Norman Trebilcock Reviewer(s ) Applicant Page 5 of 6 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 24 Packet Pg. 239 9.A.1.c Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 Collier County Traffic Impact Study Review Fee Schedule Fees will be paid incrementally as the development proceeds: Methodology Review, Analysis Review, and Sulfic:icnev Reviews. Fcm for additional mcclings or other optional services arc: also provided below. Mel hodoloey Review - SW Fee Methodology Review includes review of a submitted methodology statement, including renew of submitted trip generation estimatc(s), distribution, assignment. and review of a ,Small Scale Study" determination, written approval/comments on a proposed methodology statement, and written confirmation of a re submitted, amended methodology statement, and one meeting in Co I I icr County, ifnecded_ "Small Scale 51udv" Review - No Additional Fee (Includes. one sutMdency reviewI Upon approval of the methodology review. the applicant may submit the study. The review includes: a concunm-ney dctcrmination, site access inspection and confirmation of the study compliance with trip generation. distribution and maximum threshold compliance. " Ajinor Study Review" - S750 Fen [Includes one sufficiency review) Review of the submitted bale analysis includes: opliona1 field visit to site, confirmation of trip generation, distribution, and assignment, concurrency determination, confirmation of committed improvemenis, review of traffic volume data collected/assembled, revimv of off -site improvements within the riglit-of way, review of site access and circulation, and preparation and review of "sufficiency" comments/questions. "Maior Stud►• Review" - $1,500 Fee (Includes two intersecion analysis and two sufficiency reviews Review of the submitted traffic analysis includes: field visit to site, confirmation of trip generation. special trip generation and/or trip length study, distribution and assignment.. coneurrenrcy determination, confirmation of committed improvements, review of traffic volume data collected/assembled, review of traific growLlt analysis, review of off-6 tc roadway operations and capacity analysis, review of site access and circulation neighborhood traffic intrusion issues_ any necessary improvement proposals and associated cost estimates, and preparation and rcview of up to two rounds of "sufficieurcy" comments/quesLions and/or recommended conditions of approval. "_Additional intersection Review" - $500 Fee The review of additional intersections sliall include the same parameters as outlined in the "Major Study Review" and shall apply to each intersection above the first two intersections included in the "Major Study Review" "Additiona] Sit niciencv Reviews" - SSN Fee Additional sufficiency reviews beyond those initially included in the appropriate study shall require the additional Fee prior to the completion of the review. Page 6 of 6 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 25 Packet Pg. 240 9.A.1.c Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 Appendix C: ITE Trip Generation Calculations Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 26 Packet Pg. 241 9.A.1.c Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 ITE TGM 11`h Edition — Land Use Descriptions Land use: 151 Mini -Warehouse Description A mini -warehouse is a building in which a number of storage units or vaults are rented for the storage of goods. They are typically referred to as "self -storage" facilities. Each unit is physically separated From other units, and access is usually provided through an overhead door or other common access point. Additional Data The technical appendices provide supporting information on time -of -day distributions for this land use. The appendices can be accessed through either the ITETripGen web Opp or the trip generation resource page on the ITE website (httPsZJlw y:ite:or91technical-resources/topics/trip- and parkin�.generationJ�. The sites were surveyed in the 1960s, the 1990s, the 2000s, and the 201 as in California, Colorado, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, Texas, and Utah. Source Numbers 212, 403, 551, 568, 642, 708, 724, 85D, 868, 876, 1024, 1035 General Urban/Suburban and Rural [Land Uses ffa0-399] 109 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 27 Packet Pg. 242 9.A.1.c Livingston Veterans -Commercial Planned Unit Development -Traffic Impact Statement -January 2024 Land Use: 821 Shopping Plaza (40-150k) Description A shopping plaza is an integrated group of commercial establishments that is planned, developed, owned, and managed as a unit. Each study site in this land use has between 40,000 and 150,000 square feet of gross leasable area (GLA). The term "plaza" in the land use name rather than "center" is simply a means of distinction between the different shopping center size ranges. Various other names are commonly used to categorize a shopping plaza within this size range, depending on its specific size and tenants, such as neighborhood center, community center, and fashion center. Its major tenant is often a supermarket but many sites are anchored by home improvement, discount, or other stores. A shopping plaza typically contains more than retail merchandising facilities. Office space, a movie theater, restaurants, a post office, banks, a health club, and recreational facilities are common tenants. A shopping plaza is almost always open-air and the GLA is the same as the gross floor area of the building, The 150,000 square feet GLA threshold value between shopping plaza and shopping center (Land Use 820) is based on an examination of trip generation data. For a shopping plaza that is smaller than the threshold value, the presence or absence of a supermarket within the plaza has a measurable effect on site trip generation. For a shopping center that is larger than the threshold value, the trips generated by its other major tenants mask any effects of the presence or absence of an on -site supermarket. The 40,000 square feet GFA threshold between shopping plaza and strip retail plaza (Land Use 822) was selected based on an examination of the overall shopping center/plaza database. No shopping plaza with a supermarket as its anchor is smaller than 40,000 square feet GLA. Shopping center (>i 50k) (Land Use 820), strip retail plaza (<40k) (Land Use 822), and factory outlet center (Land Use 823) are related uses. Land Use Subcategory The presence or absence of a supermarket in a shopping plaza has been determined to have a measurable effect on site trip generation. Therefore, data are presented for two subcategories for this land use: sites with a supermarket anchor and sites without a supermarket. Additional Data Tile technical appendices provide supporting information on time -of -day distributions for this land use. The appendices can be accessed through either the ITETripGen web app or the trip generation resource page on the ITE webs ite (httpsWwww.ite.org/technical-resourcesltopicsltrip- ..................................................................................... a.nd-.....pa .rk....inq,-fi....e neratio n/). ....................... ,W General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 800-999) 197 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 28 Packet Pg. 243 Livingston Veterans -Commercial Planned Unit Development -Traffic Impact Statement -January 2024 9.A.1.c The sites were surveyed in the 1980s, the 1990s, the 2000s, and the 201 Ds in Alberta (CAN), British Columbia (CAN), California, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, Ontario (CAN), Oregon, Pennsylvania, South ❑akota, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, and Wisconsin. Source Numbers 105, 110, 156, 159, 186, 198, 204, 211, 213, 239, 259, 26D, 295, 301, 304, 3D5, 307. 317, 319, 358, 376, 390, 400, 444, 437, 444, 446, 507, 580, 598, 658, 728, 9D8, 926, 944, 946, 960, 973, 974, 1004, 1009, 1025, 1069 198 Trip Generation Manual 111h Editlon • Volume 5 "9 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 129 Packet Pg. 244 Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 9.A.1.c Land Use: 822 Strip Retail Plaza (<40k) Description A strip retail plaza is an integrated group of commercial establishments that is planned, developed, owned, and managed as a unit. Each study site in this land use has less than 40,000 square €eet of gross leasable area (GLA). Because a strip retail plaza is open -air, the GLA is the same as the gross floor area of the building. The 40,000 square Feet GFA threshold between strip retail plaza and shopping plaza (Land Use 821) was selected based on an examination of the overall shopping center/plaza database. No shopping plaza with a supermarket as its anchor is smaller than 40,000 square feet GLA. Shopping center (>150k) (Land use 82D), shopping plaza (40-150k) (Land Use 821), and factory outlet center (Land Use 823) are related uses - Additional Data The technical appendices provide supporting information on time -of -day distributions for this land use. The appendices can be accessed through either the ITETripGen web app or 1lie trip generation resource page on the I T E website (https.11www.ite.or9/technical-resourcesltopicslirip- ....................................................................... and parkin�_�eneration�). The sites were surveyed in the 1980s, the 199Os, the 2000s, and the 201 Os in Alberta (CAN), California, Delaware, Florida, New Jersey, Ontario (CAN), South Dakota, Vermont, Washington, and Wisconsin. Source Numbers 304, 358, 423, 428, 437, 507, 715, 728, 936, 960, 961, 974, 1009 228 Trip Generation Manual 111h Editlon • Volume 5 W Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 30 Packet Pg. 245 Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 9.A.1.c Land Use: 945 Convenience Stare/Gas Station Description A convenience sicrelgas station is a facility with a co -located convenience store and gas station. The convenience store sells grocery and other everyday items that a person may need or want as a matter of convenience. The gas station sells automotive fuels such as gasoline and diesel. A convenience sicrelgas station is typically located along a major thoroughfare to optimize motorist convenience. Extended hours of operation (with many open 24 hours, 7 days a week) are common at these facilities. The convenience store product mix typically includes pre -packaged grocery items, beverages, dairy products, snack foods, confectionary, tobacco products, over-the-counter drugs, and toiletries. A convenience store may sell alcohol, often limited to beer and wine. Coffee and pre - made sandwiches are also commonly sold at a convenience store. Made -to -order food orders are sometimes offered. Some stores offer limited seating. The sites in this land use include both self -pump and attendant -pumped fueling positions and both pre -pay and post -pay operations. Convenience store (Land Use 851), gasolinelservice station (Land Use 944), and truck stop (Land Use 950) are related uses. Land Use Subcategory Multiple subcategories were added to this land use to allow for multi -variable evaluation of sites with single -variable data plots. All study sites are assigned to one of three subcategories, based on the number of vehicle fueling positions (VFP) at the site: between 2 and 8 VFP, between 9 and 15 VFP, and between 16 and 24 VFP. For each VFP range subcategory, data plots are presented with GFA as the independent variable for all time periods and trip types for which data are available. The use of both GFA and VFP (as the independent variable and land use subcategory, respectively) provides a significant improvement in the reliability of a trip generation estimate when compared to the single -variable data plots in prior editions of Trip Generation Manual. Further, the study sites were also assigned to one of three other subcategories, based on the gross floor area (GFA) of the convenience store at the site: between 2,000 and 4,000 square feet, between 4,000 and 5,500 square feet, and between 5,500 and 10,000 square feet. For each GFA subcategory range, data plots are presented with VFP as the independent variable for all time periods and trip types for which data are available. The use of both VFP and GFA (as the independent variable and land use subcategory, respectively) provides a significant improvement in the reliability of a trip generation estimate when compared to the single -variable data plots in prior editions of Trip Generation Manual. 864 Trip Generation Manual 111h Editlon • Volume 5 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Pale 131 Packet Pg. 246 9.A.1.c Livingston Veterans -Commercial Planned Unit Development -Traffic Impact Statement -January 2024 When analyzing the convenience store/gas station land use with each combination of GFA and VFP values as described above, the two sets of data plots will produce two estimates of site - generated trips. Both values can be considered when determining a site trip generation estimate. Data plots are also provided for three additional independent variables: AM peak hour traffic on adjacent street, PM peak hour traffic on adjacent street, and employees- These independent variables are intended to be analyzed as single independent variables and do not have sub- categories associated with them. Within the data plots and within the ITETripGen web app, these plots are found under the land use subcategory "none." Additional Data ITE recognizes there are existing convenience store gas station sites throughout North America that are larger than the sites presented in the data plots. However, the ITE database does not include any site with more than 24 VFP or any site with gross floor area greater than 10,000 square feet. Submission of trip generation data for larger sites Is encouraged. The technical appendices provide supporting information on time -of -day distributions for this land use. The appendices can be accessed through either the ITETripGen web app or the trip generation resource page on the ITE website (htt s:llwww.ite.or (technical-resources/ta icsltrip- a nd. pa rking _ge aeration/). The sites were surveyed in the 1980s, the 1990s, the 2000s, and the 2010s in Alberta (CAN), Arkansas, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Washington, and Wisconsin. Source Numbers 221, 245, 274, 288, 300, 340, 350, 351, 352, 355, 359, 385, 440, 617, 718, 810, 813, 844, 850, 853, 864, 865, 867, 869, 882, 883. 888, 904, 926, 927. 936, 938, 954, 960, 962, 977, 1004, 1024. 1025, 1027, 1052 General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 800-999) 865 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 132 Packet Pg. 247 9.A.1.c Livingston Veterans — Commercial Planned Unit Development — Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 Gas Station — Trip Generation Comparison Project Nwm Veterans Commercial - Gas Station Comparison No: Deb: 11124M21 City: Sho/Prevtncw Zip/Postal Code: Coutrtry: Client Name: Analyeft Name: Edition: Trip Generation Manual, 11th Ed AM PEAK HOt. PM PEAK HOUR LAND USE Entry Exit Entry Exit Entry Exit 945- Convenience StorelGas Station - GFA (5.5.10k) (General Urban/Suburban) 12 W 2075 2074 190 189 162 161 Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 Internal 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peas -by 0 0 0 0 0 0 Non-pmm* 2075 2074 190 189 162 161 945 - Convenience StonkOO Sb Uon -1- VFP (9-1 a) (General UrbanlSubiwban) 6 M 2102 2101 170 169 164 163 Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 Internal 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -by 0 0 0 0 0 0 Non -pass -by 2102 1 2101 170 169 1 164 163 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 33 Packet Pg. 248 Livingston Veterans — Commercial Planned Unit Development — Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 9.A.1.c PERIOD SETTING Analysis Name: Daily Project Name: Veterans Commercial - Gas No: Station Comparison Date: 11/24/2021 City: State/Province: Zip/Postal Code: Country: Client Name: Analyst's Name: Edition: Land Use Independent Size Time Period Method Variable 945 - Convenience Vehicle Fueling 12 Weekday Average Store/Gas Station - Positions 345.75 G FA (5.5-10k) (General Urban/Suburban) 945 - Convenience 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 6 Weekday Average Store/Gas Station - 1- 700.43 VFP (9-15) (General Urban/Suburban) (0) indicates small sample size, use carefully. PERIOD SETTING Analysis Name : AM Peak Hour Project Name : Veterans Commercial - Gas No: Station Comparison Date: 1 V24/2021 City: State/Province: ZiplPostal Code: Country: Client Name: Analyst's Name: Edition: Land Use Independent Size Time Period Method Variable 945 - Convenience Vehicle Fueling 12 Weekday, Peak Average Store/Gas Station - Positions Hour of Adjacent 31.6 GFA (5.5-10k) Street Traffic, (General One Hour Urban/Suburban) Between 7 and 9 a.m. 945 - Convenience 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 6 Weekday, Peak Average Store/Gas Station - 1 - Hour of Adjacent 56.52 VFP (9-15) (General Street Traffic, Urban/Suburban) One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. Trip Generation Manual, iith Ed Entry Exit Total 20750) 2074(0) 4149(0) 50% 50% 2102 2101 4203 50% 50% Trip Generation Manual, 11th Ed Entry Exit Total 190 189 379 50% 50% 170 169 339 50% 50% Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA p , T 1 34 Packet Pg. 249 Livingston Veterans — Commercial Planned Unit Development — Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 9.A.1.c Analysis Name: Project Name: Date: State/Province: Country: Analyst's Name: Land Use 945 - Convenience Store/Gas Station - GFA (5.5-10k) (General Urban/Suburban) 945 - Convenience Store/Gas Station - 1 - VFP (9-15) (General Urban/Suburban) PM Peak Hour Veterans Commercial - Gas No Station Comparison 11/24/2021 City: Zip/Postal Code: Client Name: Edition: Independent Size Variable Vehicle Fueling 12 Positions 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 6 Time Period Method Weekday, Peak Average Hour of Adjacent 26.9 Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Weekday, Peak Average Hour of Adjacent 54.52 Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Trip Generation Manual, 11th Ed Entry Exit Total 162 161 323 50% 50% 164 163 327 50% 50% Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a p 1 35 Packet Pg. 250 9.A.1.c Livingston Veterans — Commercial Planned Unit Development — Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 Development Scenario 1— Trip Generation Project Name: Veterans Commercial - Scenario 1 No: Gate: 1112412021 City: State rprarince. ZlplPostat Code: Country: Cl lent Name: AnsW& Name: Edition: Trip Generation Manual, 11th Ed AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR LAND USE .... Entry Exit Entry Exit Entry Exit: 822 - Strip Retell Plaza (Samp;lt;40k) (General UrbeNSuburban) 11 (1) 300 299 15 10 42 41 Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 Internal 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -by 45 45 4 3 10 11 Non -pass -by 255 254 12 7 32 30 945 - Convenience StorelGas Station - VFP (9-15) (General UrbaNSuburban) 5 M 2102 2101 170 169 164 163 Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 Internal 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -by 841 840 85 85 82 82 Non -pass -by 1261 1261 65 84 82 81 Total 2402 2400 155 179 206 204 Total Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Internal 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Pass -by 886 885 89 88 92 93 Total Non -pass -by 1516 Isis 97 91 114 111 (1) 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA (2) 1000 Sq. Fr. GFA Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 136 c 0 a� c J rn N N CO) O O O N N O N J a M rn t7) ti N Packet Pg. 251 Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 9.A.1.c 70 Analysis Name: Project Name : Date: State/Province: Country: Analyst's Name: PERIOD SETTING Daily Veterans Commercial - Scenario 1 l l i2412021 No: City: Zip/Postal Code: Client Name: Edition: Land Use Independent Size Time Period Method Variable 822 - Strip Retail Plaza 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA 11 Weekday Average (&lt;40k) (General 54.45 Urban/Suburban) 945 - Convenience 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 6 Weekday Average Store/Gas Station - 700.43 VFP (9-15) (General Urban/Suburban) (0) indicates small sample size, use carefully Land Use 822 - Strip Retail Plaza (&lt;40k) 945 - Convenience StorelGas Station TRAFFIC REDUCTIONS Tnp Generation Manual, 11th Ed Entry Exit Total 30010I 299(e) 599(c) 50% 50% 2102 2101 4203 50% 50% Entry Adjusted Entry Exit Reduction Adjusted Exit Reduction 0% 300 0% 299 0% 2102 0% 2101 INTERNAL TRIPS 822 - Strip Retail Plaza (&lt;40k) 945 - Convenience Store/Gas Station Exit 299 Demand Exit: 0 % (0) BalanOced: Demand Entry: 0 % (0) Entry 2102 Entry 300 Demand Entry: 0 % (0) BalanOced: Demand Exit: 0% (0) Exit 2101 822 - Strip Retail Plaza (&lt;40k) Internal Trips Total Trips N5 . Convenience Total External Trips Store/Gas Station Entry 300 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 300 (100%) Exit 299 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 299 (100%) Total 599 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 599 (100%) US - Convenience Store/Gas Station I Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 37 Packet Pg. 252 9.A.1.c Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 Total Trips Intsmal Trips External Trips 922 - Strip Retail Plaza Total (&—p:R:40k) Entry 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2102 (100%) Exit 2101 000%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) `2101 (100%) EXTERNAL TRIPS Land Use Extemal Trips Pass -by% Pass -by Trips Non -pass -by Tri ps 822 - Strip Retail Plaza (&It;40k) 599 i5 90 509 945 - Convenience Store/Gas Station 4203 40 1681 2522 ITE DEVIATION DETAILS Weekday Landuse No deviations from ITE. Methods No deviations from ITE. External Trips 822 - Strip Retail Plaza (&lt;40k) (General Urban/Suburban) ITE does not recommend a particular pass -by% for this case. 945 - Convenience StorelGas Station - VFP (9-15) (General Urban/Suburban) ITE does not recommend a particular pass -by% for this case. SUMMARY Total Entering 2402 Total Exiting 2400 Total Entering Reduction 0 Total Exiting Reduction 0 Total Entering Internal Capture Reduction 0 Total Exiting Internal Capture Reduction 0 Total Entering Pass -by Reduction 886 Total Exiting Pass -by Reduction 885 Total Entering Non -Pass -by Trips 1516 Total Exiting Non -Pass -by Trips 1515 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 138 Packet Pg. 253 9.A.1.c Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 PERIOD SETTING Analysis Name : AM Peak Hour Project Name : Veterans Commercial - No: Scenario 1 Date: 11/24/2021 City: StatelProvince: Zip/Postal Code: Country: Client Name: Analyst's Name: Edition: Trip Generation Manual, 11th Ed Land Use Independent Size Time Period Method Entry Exit Total Variable 822 - Strip Retail Plaza 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA 11 Weekday, Peak Average 16{0} 10(0) 26(0) (&lt;40k) (General Hour of Adjacent 2.36 62% 38% Urban/Suburban) Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 am_ 945 - Convenience 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 6 Weekday, Peak Average 170 169 339 Store/Gas Station - Hour of Adjacent 56.52 50% 60% VFP (9-15) (General Street Traffic, Urban/Suburban) One Hour Between 7 and 9 a_m_ (0) indicates small sample size, use carefully. TRAFFIC REDUCTIONS Land Use Entry Reduction Adjusted Entry Exit Reduction Adjusted Exit 822 - Strip Retail Plaza (&It,401k) 0 % 16 0 % 10 945 - Convenience Store/Gas Station 0 % 170 0 % 169 INTERNAL TRIPS 822 - Strip Retail Plaza (&lt;40k) 945 - Convenience Store/Gas Station Exit 10 Demand Exit: 0 % (0) BalanOced. Demand Entry: 0 % (0) Entry 170 Entry 16 Demand Entry: 0 % (0) BalanOced: Demand Exit: 0 % (0) Exit 169 822 - Strip Retail Plaza (&lt;40k) Internal Trips Total Trips 945 • Convenience Total External Trips StorelGas Station Entry 16 000%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 16 (100%) Exit 10 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 10 (100%) Total 1215, (100%) 10 (0%) 0 (0%) 126 (100%) Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a ¢ e 139 Packet Pg. 254 9.A.1.c Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 945 - Convenience Store/Gas Station Internal Trips Total Trips External Trips gn - Strip Retail Plaza Totd (&It;40k) Entry 170 (100%) 170 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) Exit 169 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 169 (100%) Total 339 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 339 (100%) Land Use 822 - Strip Retail Plaza (&lt;40k) 945 - Convenience Store/Gas Station EXTERNAL TRIPS External Trips Pass -by% 26 25 339 50 ITE DEVIATION DETAILS Pass -by Trips Non -pass -by Trips 7 19 170 169 Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. Landuse No deviations from ITE. Methods No deviations from ITE. External Trips 822 -Strip Retail Plaza (&It;40k) (General Urban/Suburban) ITE does not recommend a particular pass -by% for this case. 945 - Convenience Store/Gas Station - VFP (9-15) (General Urban/Suburban) ITE does not recommend a particular pass -by% for this case. Total Entering 186 Total Exiting 179 Total Entering Reduction 0 Total Exiting Reduction 0 Total Entering Internal Capture Reduction 0 Total Exiting Internal Capture Reduction 0 Total Entering Pass -by Reduction 89 Total Exiting Pass -by Reduction 88 Total Entering Non -Pass -by Trips 97 Total Exiting Non -Pass -by Trips 91 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 140 Packet Pg. 255 9.A.1.c Livingston Veterans -Commercial Planned Unit Development -Traffic Impact Statement -January 2024 PERIOD SETTING Analysis Name : PM Peak Hour Project Name: Veterans Commercial - No: Scenario 1 Date: 11/24/2021 City: StatelProvince: Zip/Postal Code: Country: Client Name: Analyst's Name: Edition: Land Use Independent Size Time Period Method Variable 822 - Strip Retail Plaza 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA 11 Weekday, Peak Best Fit (LOG) (&lt;40k) (General Hour of Adjacent Ln(T) = 0.71 Ln(X) Urban/Suburban) Street Traffic, +2.72 One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. 945 - Convenience 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 6 Weekday, Peak Average Store/Gas Station - Hour of Adjacent 54.52 VFP (9-15) (General Street Traffic, Urban/Suburban) One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. TRAFFIC REDUCTIONS Land Use Entry Reduction 822 - Strip Retail Plaza (&It;40k) 0 % 945 - Convenience Store/Gas Station 0 % Trip Generation Manual, 11th Ed Entry Exit Total 42 41 83 51 % 49% 164 163 327 50% 50% Adjusted Entry Exit Reduction Adjusted Exit 42 0 % 41 164 0 % 163 INTERNAL TRIPS 822 - Strip Retail Plaza (&lt;40k) 945 - Convenience Store/Gas Station Exit 41 Demand Exit: 0 % (0) Balanced: Demand Entry: 0 % (0) Entry 164 Entry 42 Demand Entry: 0 % (0) Balanced: Demand Exit: 0 % (0) Exit 163 822 - Strip Retail Plaza (&lt;40k) Internal Trips Total Trips 9" . Convenience Tafd External Trips Store/Gas Station Entry 42 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 42 (100%) Exit 41 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 41 (100%) Total 1 83 (100%) 0 (0%) 1 0 (0%) 83 (100%) Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 141 Packet Pg. 256 Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 9.A.1.c 17 945 - Convenience StorelGas Station Internal Trips Total Trips 822 - Strip Retail Plaza Total External Trips (&antp;lt;40k) Entry 164 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 164 (100%) Exit 163 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 163 (100%) Total 327 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 327 (100%) Land Use 822 - Strip Retail Plaza (&lt;40k) 945 - Convenience Store/Gas Station EXTFRNAL TRIPS External Trips Pass -by% 83 25 327 50 ITE DEVIATION DETAILS Pass -by Trips Non -pass -by Trips 21 62 164 163 Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Landuse No deviations from ITE. Methods No deviations from ITE. External Trips 822 -Strip Retail Plaza (&It;40k) (General Urban/Suburban) ITE does not recommend a particular pass -by% for this case. 945 - Convenience Store/Gas Station - VFP (9-15) (General Urban/Suburban) ITE does not recommend a particular pass -by% for this case. Total Entering 206 Total Exiting 204 Total Entering Reduction 0 Total Exiting Reduction 0 Total Entering Internal Capture Reduction 0 Total Exiting Internal Capture Reduction 0 Total Entering Pass -by Reduction 92 Total Exiting Pass -by Reduction 93 Total Entering Non -Pass -by Trips 114 Total Exiting Non -Pass -by Trips 111 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 42 Packet Pg. 257 9.A.1.c Livingston Veterans - Commercial Planned Unit Development - Traffic Impact Statement -January 2024 Development Scenario 2 - Trip Generation Project Name: Veterans Commercial - Scenario 2 No: Date: 11/24/2021 City: StatelProvince: Zip/Postal Code: Country: Client Name: Analyst's Name: Edition: Trip Generation Manual, 11th Ed AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR LAND USA Entry Exit Entry Exit Entry Exit 161 - Mini -Warehouse (General Urban/Suburban) 58 58 4 3 6 6 Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 Internal 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -by 0 0 0 0 0 0 Non -pass -by 58 58 4 3 6 6 945 -Convenience StorelGaa Station - VFP (9-15) (General UrbanlSuburbsn) a(l) 2102 2101 170 169 164 163 Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 Internal 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -by 841 B40 85 B5 82 82 Non -pass -by 1261 1261 85 84 82 al Total 2160 2159 174 172 170 169 Total Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Internal 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Pass -by 841 840 85 85 82 82 Total Non -pass -by 1319 1 1319 1 89 B7 88 87 (1) 10W 5q. R GFA Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 143 c 0 a� c J N N CO) O O O N N O N J a M W) C) ti N Packet Pg. 258 9.A.1.c Livingston Veterans -Commercial Planned Unit Development -Traffic Impact Statement -January 2024 PERIOD SETTING Analysis Name: Daily Project Name : Veterans Commercial - No: Scenario 2 Date: 11/24/2021 City: State/Province: Zip/Postal Code: Country: Client Name: Analyst's Name: Edition: Land Use Independent Size Time Period Method Variable 161 - Mini -Warehouse 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 80 Weekday Average (General 1.45 Urban/Suburban) 945 - Convenience 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 6 Weekday Average StorelGas Station - 700.43 VFP (9-15) (General Urban/Suburban) TRAFFIC REDUCTIONS Trip Generation Manual, 11th Ed Entry Exit Total 58 58 116 50% 50% 2102 2101 4203 50% 50% Land Use Entry Adjusted Entry Exit Reduction Adjusted Exit Reduction 151 - Mini -Warehouse 0 % 58 0 % 58 945 - Convenience StorelGas Station 0 % 2102 0 % 2101 INTERNAL TRIPS 151 - Mini -Warehouse 945 - Convenience StorelGas Station Exit 58 Demand Exit: 0 % (0) Balanced: Demand Entry: 0 % (0) Entry 2102 Entry 58 Demand Entry: 0 % (0) Bala 0 Balanced'. Demand Exit: 0 % (0) Exit 2101 151 - Mini -Warehouse Internal Trips Total Trips 945 -Convenience Total External Trips Store/Gan Station Entry 58 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 58 (100%) Exit 58 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 58 (100%) Total 116 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 116 (100%) 945 - Convenience Store/Gas Station Total Trips Internal Tdps External Trips Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 144 Packet Pg. 259 9.A.1.c Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 151 -Mini-Warehouse Toted Entry 2102 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2102 (100%) Exit 2101 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 12101 (100%) Total 4203 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 14203 (100%) Land Use 151 - Mini -Warehouse 945 - Convenience Store/Gas Station Weekday Landuse No deviations from ITE. Methods No deviations from ITE. EXTERNAL TRIPS External Trips Pass -by% 116 0 4203 40 ITE DEVIATION DETAILS Pass -by Trips Non -pass -by Tri ps 0 116 1681 2522 External Trips 151 - Mini -Warehouse (General Urban/Suburban) ITE does not recommend a particular pass-by°/a for this case. 945 - Convenience StorelGas Station - VFP (9-15) (General Urban/Suburban) ITE does not recommend a particular pass-bya/a for this case. 7UMMAK7 Total Entering 2160 Total Exiting 2159 Total Entering Reduction 0 Total Exiting Reduction 0 Total Entering Internal Capture Reduction 0 Total Exiting Internal Capture Reduction 0 Total Entering Pass -by Reduction 841 Total Exiting Pass -by Reduction 840 Total Entering Non -Pass -by Trips 1319 Total Exiting Non -Pass -by Trips 1319 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 45 Packet Pg. 260 9.A.1.c Livingston Veterans -Commercial Planned Unit Development -Traffic Impact Statement -January 2024 PERIOD SETTING Analysis Name: AM Peak Hour Project Name : Veterans Commercial - No: Scenario 2 Date: 11 /24/2021 City: StatelProvince: Zip/Postal Code: Country: Client Name: Analyst's Name: Edition: Trip Generation Manual, 11th Ed Land Use Independent Size Time Period Method Entry Exit Total Variable 151 - Mini -Warehouse 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 80 Weekday, Peak Average 4 3 7 (General Hour of Adjacent 0.09 57% 43% Urban/Suburban) Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. 945-Convenience 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 6 Weekday, Peak Average 170 169 339 Store/Gas Station - Hour of Adjacent 56.52 50% 50% VFP (9-15) (General Street Traffic, Urban/Suburban) One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. TRAFFIC REDUCTIONS Land Use Entry Reduction Adjusted Entry Exit Reduction Adjusted Exit 151 - Mini -Warehouse 0 % 4 0 % 3 945 - Convenience Store/Gas Station 0 % 170 0 % 169 INTERNAL TRIPS 151 - Mini -Warehouse 945 - Convenience Store/Gas Station Exit 3 Demand Exit: 0 % (0) BalanOced: Demand Entry: 0 % (0) Entry 170 Entry 4 Demand Entry: 0 % (0) BalanOced: Demand Exit: 0 % (0) Exit 169 151 - Mini -Warehouse Total Trips Entry 4 (100%) Exit 3 (100%) Internal Trips Total External Trips 0 (0%) 4 (100%) 0 (0%) 3 (100%) 945 -Convenience Store/Gas Station 0 (0%) 0 (0%) Total 7 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 7 (100%) Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 46 Packet Pg. 261 9.A.1.c Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 945 - Convenience StorelGas Station Internal Trips Total Trips External Trips 151 - Mlnl Warehouse 0 (0%) Total 0 (0%) 170 (100%) Entry 170 (100%) Exit 169 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 169 (100%) Total 339 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1339 (100%) Land Use 151 - Mini -Warehouse 945 - Convenience StorelGas Station EXTERNAL TRIPS External Trips Pass -by% 7 0 339 50 ITE DEVIATION DETAILS Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. Landuse No deviations from ITE. Methods No deviations from ITE. Pass -by Trips Non -pass -by Trips 0 7 170 169 External Trips 151 - Mini -Warehouse (General Urban/Suburban) ITE does not recommend a particular pass -by°/ for this case. 945 - Convenience Store/Gas Station - VFP (9-15) (General Urban/Suburban) ITE does not recommend a particular pass-by%a for this case. a u m mr-krt r Total Entering 174 Total Exiting 172 Total Entering Reduction 0 Total Exiting Reduction 0 Total Entering Internal Capture Reduction 0 Total Exiting Internal Capture Reduction 0 Total Entering Pass -by Reduction 85 Total Exiting Pass -by Reduction 85 Total Entering Non -Pass -by Trips 89 Total Exiting Non -Pass -by Trips 87 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 47 Packet Pg. 262 9.A.1.c Livingston Veterans -Commercial Planned Unit Development -Traffic Impact Statement -January 2024 PERIOD SETTING Analysis Name: PM Peak Hour Project Name : Veterans Commercial - No: Scenario 2 Date: 11 /24/2021 City: StatelProvince: Zip/Postal Code: Country: Client Name: Analyst's Name: Edition: Trip Generation Manual, 11th Ed Land Use Independent Size Time Period Method Entry Exit Total Variable 151 - Mini -Warehouse 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 80 Weekday, Peak Average 6 6 12 (General Hour of Adjacent 0.15 50% 50% Urban/Suburban) Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. 945-Convenience 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 6 Weekday, Peak Average 164 163 327 Store/Gas Station - Hour of Adjacent 54.52 50% 50% VFP (9-15) (General Street Traffic, Urban/Suburban) One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. TRAFFIC REDUCTIONS Land Use Entry Reduction Adjusted Entry Exit Reduction Adjusted Exit 151 - Mini -Warehouse 0 % 6 0 % 6 945 - Convenience Store/Gas Station 0 % 164 0 % 163 INTERNAL TRIPS 151 - Mini -Warehouse 945 - Convenience Store/Gas Station Exit 6 Demand Exit: 0 % (0) BalanOced: Demand Entry: 0 % (0) Entry 164 Entry 6 Demand Entry: 0 % (0) BalanOced: Demand Exit: 0 % (0) Exit 163 151 - Mini -Warehouse Total Trips Entry 6 (100%) Exit 6 (100%) Internal Trips Total External Trips 945 -Convenience Store/Gas Station 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 6 (100%) 6 (100%) Total 12 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 12 (100%) Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 148 Packet Pg. 263 9.A.1.c Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 945 - Convenience StorelGas Station Internal Trips Total Trips External Trips 151 - Mlnl Warehouse 0 (0%) Total 0 (0%) 164 (100%) Entry 164 (100%) Exit 163 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 163 (100%) Total 327 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1327 (100%) Land Use 151 - Mini -Warehouse 945 - Convenience StorelGas Station EXTERNAL TRIPS External Trips Pass -by% 12 0 327 50 ITE DEVIATION DETAILS Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Landuse No deviations from ITE. Methods No deviations from ITE. Pass -by Trips Non -pass -by Trips 0 12 164 163 External Trips 151 - Mini -Warehouse (General Urban/Suburban) ITE does not recommend a particular pass -by°/ for this case. 945 - Convenience Store/Gas Station - VFP (9-15) (General Urban/Suburban) ITE does not recommend a particular pass-by%a for this case. a u m mr-krt r Total Entering 170 Total Exiting 169 Total Entering Reduction 0 Total Exiting Reduction 0 Total Entering Internal Capture Reduction 0 Total Exiting Internal Capture Reduction 0 Total Entering Pass -by Reduction 82 Total Exiting Pass -by Reduction 82 Total Entering Non -Pass -by Trips 88 Total Exiting Non -Pass -by Trips 87 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 49 Packet Pg. 264 9.A.1.c Livingston Veterans — Commercial Planned Unit Development — Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 Development Scenario 3 — Trip Generation "ad Name: Veterans Commercial -Scenario 3 No: Dab: 11/3012021 City- SlablPraWnoa: Zip/Postal Code: country: CIiard Name: AnslyaPs Name: Edition: Trip Generation Manuel, 11th Ed r,ILY AM PEAT( HOUR PM PEAK HOUR LAND US Entry ExH Entry Exit Entry Exit 621 - Shopping Plaza (40450k) - Supermarket - No (General UrbantSuburbon) 50 (r1 1588 1888 54 33 127 133 Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 Internal 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass•by 253 253 14 8 32 33 Non-paes-by 1435 1435 40 25 95 100 Total 16M 1598 54 33 127 133 Total Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Internal 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Passerby 253 253 14 8 32 33 Total Non-psas•by 1 11435 1435 140 1 25 1 95 100 (1) 10W Sq- Ft GLA Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 150 c 0 a� c J to N N CO) 0 0 0 N N 0 N J a ch W) 0) 1` N Packet Pg. 265 Livingston Veterans -Commercial Planned Unit Development -Traffic Impact Statement -January 2024 9.A.1.c Analysis Name: Project Name Date: StatelProvince: Country: Analyst's Name: PERIOD SETTING Daily Veterans Commercial - Scenario 3 11 /30/2021 No: City: Zip/Postal Code: Client Name: Edition: Land Use Independent Size Time Period Method Variable 821 - Shopping Plaza 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA 50 Weekday Average (40-150k) - 67.52 Supermarket - No (General Urban/Suburban) TRAFFIC REDUCTIONS Trip Generation Manual, 11th Ed Entry Exit Total 1688 1688 3376 50% 50% Land Use Entry Reduction Adjusted Entry Exit Reduction Adjusted Exit 821 - Shopping Plaza (40-150k) 0 % 1688 0 % 1688 EXTERNAL TRIPS Land Use External Trips Pass -by% 821 - Shopping Plaza (40-150k) 3376 15 ITE DEVIATION DETAILS Weekday Pass -by Trips Non -pass -by Trips 506 2870 Landuse No deviations from ITE. Methods No deviations from ITE. External Trips 821 - Shopping Plaza (40-150k) - Supermarket - No (General Urban/Suburban) ITE does not recommend a particular pass -by% for this case. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 151 Packet Pg. 266 9.A.1.c Livingston Veterans -Commercial Planned Unit Development -Traffic Impact Statement -January 2024 Analysis Name: Project Name Date: StatelProvince: Country: Analyst's Name: PERIOD SETTING AM Peak Hour Veterans Commercial - Scenario 3 11 /30/2021 No: City: Zip/Postal Code: Client Name: Edition: Trip Generation Manual, 11th Ed Land Use Independent Size Time Period Method Entry Exit Total Variable 821 -Shopping Plaza 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA 50 Weekday, Peak Average 54 33 87 (40-150k) - Hour of Adjacent 1.73 62% 38% Supermarket - No Street Traffic, (General One Hour Urban/Suburban) Between 7 and 9 a.m. TRAFFIC REDUCTIONS Land Use Entry Reduction Adjusted Entry Exit Reduction Adjusted Exit 821 - Shopping Plaza (40-150k) 0 % 54 0 % 33 EXTERNAL TRIPS Land Use External Trips Pass -by% Pass -by Trips Non -pass -by Trips 821 - Shopping Plaza (40-150k) 87 25 22 65 ITE DEVIATION DETAILS Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. Landuse No deviations from ITE. Methods No deviations from ITE. External Trips 821 - Shopping Plaza (40-150k) - Supermarket - No (General UrbanlSuburban) ITE does not recommend a particular pass -by% for this case. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 152 Packet Pg. 267 9.A.1.c Livingston Veterans -Commercial Planned Unit Development -Traffic Impact Statement -January 2024 Analysis Name: Project Name Date: StatelProvince: Country: Analyst's Name: PERIOD SETTING PM Peak Hour Veterans Commercial - Scenario 3 11 /30/2021 No: City: Zip/Postal Code: Client Name: Edition: Trip Generation Manual, 11th Ed Land Use Independent Size Time Period Method Entry Exit Total Variable 821 -Shopping Plaza 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA 50 Weekday, Peak Average 127 133 260 (40-150k) - Hour of Adjacent 5.19 49% 51 % Supermarket - No Street Traffic, (General One Hour Urban/Suburban) Between 4 and 6 p.m. TRAFFIC REDUCTIONS Land Use Entry Reduction Adjusted Entry Exit Reduction Adjusted Exit 821 - Shopping Plaza (40-150k) 0 % 127 0 % 133 EXTERNAL TRIPS Land Use External Trips Pass -by% Pass -by Trips Non -pass -by Trips 821 - Shopping Plaza (40-150k) 260 25 65 195 ITE DEVIATION DETAILS Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Landuse No deviations from ITE. Methods No deviations from ITE. External Trips 821 - Shopping Plaza (40-150k) - Supermarket - No (General UrbanlSuburban) ITE does not recommend a particular pass -by% for this case. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 153 Packet Pg. 268 9.A.1.c Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 Appendix D Veterans Memorial Boulevard Improvements Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 154 Packet Pg. 269 v as rD V, Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 Packet Pg. 270 9.A.1.c Attachment: Attachment B - Applicant's CCPC Backup [Revision 2] (27953 : PL20220003225 Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 N it LIVINGSTON ROAD I I ii ii 4 I NTS � III I ------------� I-_ _ _rr- ---------------------I I. —.-- .-7 VETERANS MEMORIAL BOULEVARD I PROPOSED PROJECT , I -ITT— - I .I R; I L I 'I I I L.�.—.—. c 0 J W) N N CO) 0 0 0 N N O N J a ch W) T N Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a 9 Packet Pg. 271 9.A.1.c Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 Appendix E Transportation Element Map TR - 5 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 157 Packet Pg. 272 Livingston Veterans — Commercial Planned Unit Development — Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 BONITA BEACH N w E s 0 0.5 1 2 GIS MAPPING BETH YANG 40CP AMENDED - JUNE 13, 2017 (Ord. No. 2017.25) r l W III 111TH AVE 3 ]Miles L IMM_OKALEE RD, Z II W X o 0 L9 Z �i Q' 1 41 DR .-PINE RIDG LEE COUNTY LINE ri - IMMOKALEE RD a W J C% Z C VANDERBILT BEACH RD of GOLDEN GATE in - BLVD- - - z O :RD - Qa hd-M.1 Di... f�C-ricwmixedrinso D"Pe V8 tPa; [. C3TCUA auundap TR - 5 Northwest Transportation Concurrency GroWlhrtanag emerri Dept Tron Planning Section Q Mi-d Js Acfth center suhdletricl sportelion — EMSIr9TraMitROM, Management Area (TCMA) Aaen�rcoueno� I.ds I Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Paag` c O rn C J N N CO) O 0 0 N N O N J a Packet Pg. 273 9.A.1.c Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 Appendix F 2023 AUIR - TCMA Report - Northwest TCMA Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 59 Packet Pg. 274 9.A.1.c Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 160 Packet Pg. 275 9.A.1.c Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 Appendix G Transportation Element Map TR - 7 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 61 Packet Pg. 276 9.A.1.c Livingston Veterans — Commercial Planned Unit Development — Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 'o g w� 0 2.5 5 10 15 Miles GIS Mapping_ Bem Yang Fllc_ EvacuatlenRriuesmke 1 6 4 Ili � aH 41 Y3' 13 S 29 � r 41 Ir Traffic Control Points Evacuation Routes Water Bodies O County Boundary TR-7 COLLIER COUNTY HURRICANE EVACUATION ROUTES Transportation SeMces Divlslon Collier Comfy Transportation Planning DeparlmeM Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 162 Packet Pg. 277 9.A.1.c Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 Appendix H Transportation Element Map TR - 3 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 163 Packet Pg. 278 11 FiI�m�J itK 4 OF •. BONITA ,SPRINGS INSET 1 •• {1ul 011 CITY C F� NAPL S ;CITY OF� MARCO ISLAND Livingston Veterans — Commercial Planned Unit Development — Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 IMMOKALEE LEE COUNTY\,. COLLIER COUNTY INSET 7 : ORANGETREE TA SPRINGS INSET 2 HENORY COUNTY COLLIER COUNTY N INSET 4 1 y 1� 1 � Fo OI� Q �a �3 �O O im 1 i 1 L.. z INSET 5 G L V C G c G GULF of OF i MEXICO:................................... ........................................ N w E 5 0 l 2 4 6 6 ® Mlles LEGEND - INTERSTATE OTHER FREEWAYS AND EXPRESSWAYS - OTHER PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL - MINOR ARTERIAL - MAJOR COLLECTOR MINOR COLLECTOR LOCAL 0 2010 SMOOTHED URBANIZED BOUNDARY Q 2010 SMOOTHED SMALL URBAN BOUNDARY RECOMMENDED BY - COLLIER COUNTY MPO I DATE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DATE APPROVED BY: FEDERAL HIGHWAY °�I•� ADMINISTRATION DATE FDOT DISTRICT ONE - MAP B1 FEDERAL FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION / URBAN BOUNDARIES - COLLIER COUNTY FTE 10/31/2013 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 164 c O +r N C J N N CO) O O O N N 0 N J a ch W) 0) N Packet Pg. 279 9.A.1.c Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 Appendix I Access Management Policy - Table 1 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 165 Packet Pg. 280 9.A.1.c Livingston Veterans — Commercial Planned Unit Development — Traffic Impact Statement — January 2024 Table 1 Access Classification and Standards kccess Facility Features (Median Treatment Minimum Connection Minimum Median Opening Minimum Signal Class and Access Roads) Spacing (feet)(2)(3) Spacing (mile)(2) Directional Full (feet)(2) (feet)(2) 1 Limited Access NIA NIA NIA 1 2 Controlled Access 1320 / 600 1320 2640 Q.5 ■■■i.■■■■■■■.mmial,S,0ivc ed6omm■a■w■■■■ 3 fi■■■■■■■■■ i■■■■■■■w�i2Q■■■■■■■■■pi■■.w 4 Arterials, undivided 660 / 330 N/A N/A 5 ■■■,■■■aa■mmmMeiaals Arterials divided 330 / 220 uridiViled.a■.■■■■a■. 3�r��■■■■...w■■�Ad.■■■.■...1�1.�■i■.■■.mom 440 1320/660 0.5 0.51.25 'o!�gmom 77 Arterials, divided and undivided 125 330 440 0.25 Notes: (Greater than or equal to 45 mph/less than 45 mph) (1) Section Four of this Policy contains supplementary and more detailed instruction for use of these standards. (2) These minimum spacing standards may not be adequate if auxiliary lanes and storage is required. (3) Single properties with frontages exceeding the minimum spacing criteria may not necessarily receive permits for the maximum number of possible connections. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 166 Packet Pg. 281 9.A.1.c Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 Appendix 1: Turning Movements Exhibits Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 167 Packet Pg. 282 9.A.1.c Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 a PROJECT TURNING U lea MOVEMENT MAP BY �- — PERCENTAGE AND PM — OPTION 1 LIVINGSTON RD N_T8__j PEAK HOUR RIGHT-IN/RIGHT/OUT ACCESS 0 falls Park i auonoscra� CnlNrtla Cr �vanaa.lfa Cl 49°!°; PM 101 YQierano Memorial Blvd w 25°Jd; PM 51 ma YeSer_o Meraorlel8lad VelCane Menodal9lvd 4rnarana Marial BNd Velwwn Memorial BWd Name -- - Partytenders-8arten;!e�s Q I o.rwley Lti OyME PTO I Allura o � pp¢rdem WY 75°!°; PM 153 c s o a 7 0 R P.rdenav R r = Artlenav 9 a s � PROJECT TURNING oPTION z- LIVwGSTON RD 1__he MOVEMENT MAP BY z DIRECTIONALMEDIAN PERCENTAGE AND PM LEFT IN/RIGHT-IN/RIGHT/OUT ACCESS NTS PEAK HOUR Tally Park Malr ° I eaen— o n ulGema❑ auaaaaer.c 291/o; PM 60 2ggg• PM 5 11 yarana Manrxlal Blvd Yetaan+Maraorlul al.em Yelerarve Menorlal $IVd Velaeas Mm+vodal Blvd Velareao MamodalBMd _ _ Naples _- � Partytenders-Eartende�� Q OVME PTO Allura a .rxfq Lti ppprderm WY 75%; PM 153 51°�; PM 105 aaardaaaw, c s t0 L a l ^ a Ardenav ; r f 0 Aroena9 a Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g P 168 Packet Pg. 283 9.A.1.c PENINSULA~� ENGINEERING LIVINGSTON ROAD/VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD COMMERCIAL INFILL SUBDISTRICT GMPA (PL20220003225) EXHIBIT V.E PUBLIC FACILITIES LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) ANALYSIS The subject site is located north of located at the southeast intersection of Livingston Road and Veterans Memorial Boulevard and totaling +4.68 acres, located at the southeast intersection of Livingston Road and Veterans Memorial Boulevard, in Section 13, Township 48 South, Range 25 East. The purpose of this Small-scale Growth Management Plan Amendment (SSGMPA) is to expand the Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard Commercial Infill Subdistrict (Subdistrict) to include the vacant Urban Residential parcel to the south, increasing the size from 2.25 acres to 4.68 acres. The update will also provide for a greater variety of commercial uses to serve the surrounding residential and institutional uses and update development standards. The proposed text amendment to the Subdistrict does not authorize residential development, nor increase population within the County. Therefore, there are no significant increases on public facilities as a result of this request. Summary of Existing/Proposed Use: The project site is currently undeveloped. The project site will be developed with a mix of uses. The maximum intensity permitted in the development consists of 50,000 square feet of commercial floor area and 100,000 square feet of indoor self -storage facility. The Capital Improvement Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan establishes Levels of Service for the following: • Arterial and Collector Roads • Surface Water Management Systems Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Blvd Commercial Infill Subdistrict Page 1 1 G M PA — PL20220003225 December 1, 2022 2600 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, Florida, 34105 Office 239.403.6700 Fax 239.261.1797 Fla Engineer CA 28275 Fla Landscape CA LC26000632 Fla Surveyor/Mapper LB8479 Packet Pg. 284 9.A.1.c PENINSULA ENGINEERING • Potable Water Systems • Sanitary Sewer Systems • Solid Waste Disposal Facilities • Parks and Recreation Facilities (Community and Regional Parks) • Public School Facilities • Fire Control and EMS Arterial and Collector Roads Please refer to the Traffic Impact Statement for conclusions of the project impacts on the level for service for surrounding roadways. Surface Water Management Systems The Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard Commercial Infill Subdistrict/PUDZ project is a commercial project. The stormwater management system with be designed to Collier County and SFWMD standards. A dry detention / retention pond will provide the required water quality and quantity standards prior to discharging off -site into the Livingston Road drainage infrastructure. Potable Water Systems and Sanitary Sewer Systems Potable water and wastewater for the proposed site will be provided by Collier County Utilities. Water service is readily available to the project via an existing 10" water main along the northern frontage of the property within the Veterans Memorial Boulevard right-of-way. Wastewater service is readily available to the project via an existing 12" force main along the same frontage. Water for irrigation will be provided by either a private well or Collier County Utilities subject to the provisions of LDC 4.03.08 C, the Collier County Irrigation Ordinance (2015-27) and other applicable rules and regulations. If a private well is utilized for irrigation, a water use permit through SFWMD will be applied for at the time of SDP permitting. Please see the included CC wastewater flow worksheet and Statement of Utility Provisions for proposed potable water and wastewater demands. See Table 1 for estimated Level of Service demands. Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Blvd Commercial Infill Subdistrict G M PA — PL20220003225 December 1, 2022 2600 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, Florida, 34105 Office 239.403.6700 Fax 239.261.1797 Page 1 2 Fla Engineer CA 28275 Fla Landscape CA LC26000632 Fla Surveyor/Mapper LB8479 Packet Pg. 285 9.A.1.c PENINSULA~� ENGINEERING Table 1. Estimated Level of Service Type of Unit Number Consumptive Notes Total Average Peak Total Peak of Units Rate Daily Flow Hour Hour Flow (GPD/Unit) (GPD) Factor* (GPD) Per FAC Seats 360 40 14,400 4.2 59,904 64E-6 Per FAC SF 40,000 0.1 4,000 4.2 16,640 64E-6 Per Per FAC 1 15 15 4.2 62 Employee 64E-6 Per FAC Unit < 200 200 1.0 200 4.2 832 64E-6 Per FAC Unit > 200 563 0.5 282 4.2 1,173 64E-6 Total* 78,553 *Some calculations may be in inconsistent due to rounding Solid Waste Disposal Facilities According to the Collier County 2021 AUIR, currently there is an existing landfill capacity of 12,982,923 tons, and a ten-year landfill capacity requirement of 2,902,259 tons. The estimated life of the landfill is 39 years. The existing landfill capacity is adequate to accommodate the additional tons per capita generated by the proposed project. The level of service is not significantly or adversely impacted by the proposed build -out. Community and Regional Parks The proposed non-residential development is not subject to payment of park impact fees. There will be no adverse impact to community or regional parks associated with the proposed use. Public School Facilities The proposed non-residential development is not subject to payment of school impact fees. There will be no adverse impact to public schools associated with the proposed use. Fire Control and EMS The proposed project is located within the North Collier Fire Rescue District. North Collier Fire Station #48 is located ±0.16-miles south of the subject site. Applicable impact fees will be determined and paid at time of SDP. Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Blvd Commercial Infill Subdistrict Page 1 3 GMPA — PL20220003225 December 1, 2022 2600 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, Florida, 34105 Office 239.403.6700 Fax 239.261.1797 Fla Engineer CA 28275 Fla Landscape CA LC26000632 Fla Surveyor/Mapper LB8479 Packet Pg. 286 9.A.1.c 3-Miles ��.� Legend ��.� ' LEE COUNTY ♦♦♦ Livingston Rd -Veteran's Memorial Bvld Commercial Infill Subdistrict: 4.6-acres �' ♦♦ IEIJlI� / Lee County Boundary Line / ♦ r Collier County Public Schools 2-Miles %% ♦♦ Fire Stations -Emergency Medical Services ''.00 / ♦♦ ` Police Stations North Collier Fire Control & Rescue District 40P ♦ , %` Ll Parks Q Libraries 40 1-Mile , ❑H Hospitals Veterans Memorial Elementary , GGG High ' North Collier Fire Control & Rescue District qj North Naples Middle fo Willoughby Acres Neighbhorhood Park NCH North Naples Hospital North Collier Fire Control & Rescue District HLi North Collier Fire Control & Rescue District H Landmark Hospital/Medical Center .*. ♦ Veteran's Community Park ♦ Oakes Neighbhorhood Park North Collier Regional Park Sun-nFun Lagoon 2 SOURCES: COLLIER COUNTY GEO.GRAPyIQNI O, ION SYSTEIVIS:13032� --- Mlle PROJECT: CLIENT: EXHIBIT DESC: LIVINGSTON ROAD -VETERAN'S MEMORIAL BOULEVARD LIVINGSTON VETERANS COMMERCIAL, LLC EXHIBIT V.E. -PUBLIC FACILITIES MAP PEN I N 5 U LA # COMMERCIAL INFILL SUBDISTRICT NOTES: ENGINEERING LOCATION: SE INTERSECTION OF LIVINGSTON RD 2600 GOLDENGATE PARKWAY NAPLES FL34106 AND VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD Kintinnni Flnnrl I g7nrrl I avAr FIPUnttA 1` 5 FEE- Inr 0 250 500 1,000 1,500 9.A.1.c EXHIBIT V.F.1 FEMA Legend SEE HIS REPORT FOR DETAILED LEGEND AND INDEX MAP FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT a I Without Base Flood Elevation (BFE) !' Zone A, V, A99 SPECIAL FLOOD With BFE or Depth zone AE, Ao,AN, VE,AR HAZARD AREAS Regulatory Floodway Livingston Rd -Veteran's Memorial . 0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard, Areas oft%annual than foot with average Blvd Commercial Infill Subdistrict depth less than one foot or with drainage areas of less than one Square mile zone x —Future Conditions 1%Annual Chance Flood Hazard zonex t{J Area with Reduced Flood Risk due to OTHER AREAS OF Levee. See Notes. zone x L ry fYVA FLOOD HAZARD �� Area with Flootl Risk tlue to Leveezone D _ NO SCREEN Area of Minimal Flood Hazard zonex Q Effective LOMRs OTHER AREAS Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard zone D GENERAL "--' Channel, Culvert, or Storm Sewer STRUCTURES I I I I I I I Levee, Dike, or Floodwall Cross Sections with 1%Annual Chance 17•5 Water Surface Elevation e- - - - Coastal Transact - Base Flood Elevation Line (BFE) ZOf?L Limit of Study Jurisdiction Boundary --- --- Coastal Transact Baseline OTHER - Profile Baseline FEATURES Hydrographic Feature �� • '' ' ! L Digital Data Available pN No Digital Data Available MAP PANELS ® Unmapped The pin displayed on the map is an approximate �ry ZDne A E _ point authoritative by the user and does not represent an authoritative property location. _ This map complies with FEMA's standards for the use of digital flood maps if it is not void as described below. ° The basemap shown complies with FEMA's basemap accuracy standards The flood hazard Information is derived directly from the authoritative NFHL web services provided by FEMA. This map was exported on 8/17/2022 at 10:58 AM and does not reflect changes or amendments subsequent to this date and time. The NFHL and effective information may change or become superseded by new data over time. This map image is void if the one or more of the following map elements do not appear: basemap imagery, flood zone labels, _ - _ r legend, scale bar, map creation date, community identifiers, 81045'23"W 26017'48"N FIRM panel number, and FIRM effective date. Map images for IIIIIIIII� Feet 1 :6 000 unmapped and unmodernized areas cannot be used for 2,000 regulatory purposes. Basemap: USGS National Map: Ortholmagery. Data refreshed October, 2020 9.A.1.c _., 75CLIENT: PENINSULAQ COMMERCIAL INIIUL SUBDISTRICT LIVINGSTON VETERANS COMMERCIAL, ULC EXHIBIT DE C: EXHIBIT V.F.2 - WELLFIELD PROTECTION ZONES MAP ENGINEERING LOCATION: 2600 GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY TRACTS 92A9T3 & 108 9.A.1.c 1>• PENINSULA�Q_; ENGINEERING Memorandum Date: October 11, 2023 To: Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA, CSM From: Christopher Scott, AICP RE: Livingston Veterans Commercial GMPA/PUDA (PL202200033225 and PL20220003226) NIM Summary A Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) was conducted for the above referenced project on Wednesday, October 4, 2023 at 5:30 pm at the Collier County Library Headquarters Branch, Sugden Theater, located at 2385 Orange Blossom Road, Naples, Florida. Approximately thirteen (13) individuals from the public attended the meeting (see attached sign -in sheet). The meeting was simultaneously conducted through Zoom, which had four (4) connections. Individuals associated with the project team that were in attendance included the following: • Christopher Scott, Peninsula Engineering • John English, Peninsula Engineering • Jenna Woodward, Peninsula Engineering • Ciprian Malaescu, Trebilcock Consulting Solutions • Andrew Saluan, Livingston Veterans Commercial, LLC Chris Scott opened the meeting at 5:30 pm and provided a PowerPoint presentation outlining the details of the proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment and Planned Unit Development Rezoning. Following the presentation, the meeting was opened to attendees for comments and questions. The following is a summary of the questions asked, and comments made, by the attendees and responses given by the project team. Question/Comment 1: (Edward Kant, 16360 Viarsa Way #301). 1 live in Talis Park. I don't have any questions or objections. I had the opportunity to download all of material from the County's website and one of thing that caught my eye was southbound left turn into the property off of Livingston which would be determined at time of Site Plan Development. I spoke briefly with Norm about that and my other concern is I wonder if that is the appropriate time to make that determination. I think that the stacking decision I think that it is important on this specific property given its location of the intersection, the new school traffic and the other developments that are being built around there that that be determined very early on. A: to see if it's appropriate and B: if so, what's it going to look like. The reason I'm concerned about it is because it's a very short turn now on that northbound left turn. Since the school opened it can be backed up at very peak moments. It doesn't last long, but its just long enough for people to say 'I wish they'd do something about traffic.' So I PL20220003225 and PL20220003226, Livingston Veterans Commercial GMPA and PUDZ NIM Summary Page 1 2600 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, Florida, 34105 Office 239.403.6700 Fax 239.261.1797 Fla Engineer CA 28275 Fla Landscape CA LC26000632 Fla Surveyor/Mapper LB8479 packet pg. 290 9.A.1.c PENINSULAt� ENGINEERING think if they are going to do anything with the southbound left turn then they need to evaluate the southbound stack and northbound stack as they could interfere with each other. If it sounds like I'm talking about trivialities, I must confess I'm a recovering traffic engineer and was the County's Traffic Director some time before. So that's the concern I have and only about that item. The other concern I have is if you look at the geometry of the recently finished east side of Veterans Memorial, where they're going to come out, it looks like and drives like a single lane but its obviously a through lane in there; they've got it gored out, and I have concerns about traffic coming in and out of that parking lot. Its an area that could create some issues; especially with the signaling timing. They did change the signal timing; there were issues but it now works. The school currently has about 800 students but is planned for 1,800 students. So that traffic is going to triple. We are very fortunate because the elementary school entrance is about a half a mile south on Livingston and that traffic is a nightmare sometimes. So, if there are going to be any adjustments to the access then I think that needs to be done as part of the rezoning. Response: (Chris Scott) Thank you. I just want to touch on this a little bit and I know Ciprian has a lot more knowledge than I do regarding transportation planning issues. I know with a zoning request, there are two transportation related studies that happen. One is done at time of zoning and one at time of Site Development Plan. Typically at time of zoning, the analysis that is done is identifying the number of trips going in and out of the development. And then at time of Site Development Plan they do a concurrency review and that is when they look at traffic lanes and the geometry and determine what improvements need to be made. (Ciprian Malaescu) Ciprian with Trebilcock Consulting Solutions. So only analyzing with the Traffic Impact Statement is about where the access is going to be based on access management policies to County standards. The County staff could go with asking for more restrictions. Question/Comment 2: (Susan Stephens, 15834 Secoya Reserve Circle) It wasn't clear to me when I looked at your drawings if you are planning for the addition of turning lanes off of Livingston? And secondly, with the growth of traffic that is assumed I'm wondering about your plans to put a turning lane on Veteran's Memorial onto the property. My second question, comment is that we live in a very seasonal area and I believe that many of our residents aren't even here yet and I'm wondering if this public meeting should be ... wondering if for the benefit of the majority of the people that live in the area, whether part time or full time, that they have the opportunity to be at the hearing; maybe have a second hearing at the end of November when all of the snowbirds are here. I think in fairness, I didn't get a notification except from my homeowners association. Your sign that is posted is not quite read -able unless you have 20/20 vision; I'm sure that was the requirement and you did your requirement but it was kind of listing and was not up for very long and I don't know the requirement on that. Thank you. Response: (Chris Scott) In regards to the turn lanes, this is the Master Concept Plan. You can see the hatching right before the entrances; those symbolize turn lanes as required by the County. Because this is a divided roadway, Collier County's access management plan does require turn lanes at the entrances. PL20220003225 and PL20220003226, Livingston Veterans Commercial GMPA and PUDZ NIM Summary Page 2 Packet Pg. 291 9.A.1.c PENINSULA,, ENGINEERING The Neighborhood Information Meeting, we are required to have it after the first round of review comments. They do get letters sent to property owners within 500 feet, and as you mentioned, your community had sent an email blast to the residents. We do allow those who cannot make it to the meeting to participate through Zoom and we do have some folks on Zoom currently. There is not a signage requirement for the neighborhood meeting, so I'm not sure about that signage you are referring to. That signage wasn't us or anyone associated with this application. I don't know who put a sign up. (Unintelligible) (Chris Scott) Notifications go out to all owners on record with the Collier County Property Appraiser's Office. So if they have title to the land and they receive tax bills, they would get a notification. We utilize the Property Appraiser's land use records. Question/Comment 3: (Brad Overby, 15894 Secoya Reserve Circle) I'm the President of the Secoya Reserve Association. We have a number of our homeowners here tonight. Just a couple comments, more directed at the County. A lot of us have lived here for thirteen years; we built our homes in this particular development that we are in, and we've watched over these thirteen years a huge amount of growth in this North Naples area of land, development and forestry just being annihilated. And I can't find anything on any of the sites about the environmental impact of this area, of this community. What is being done with all of the development going on; and then, on top of that, now you're starting to add gas stations in other areas of commercial that a lot of us just don't understand. We've got all these facilities that are within a mile and a half of us; you go up and down Livingston and you don't see these types of facilities. We don't see the need for it, plus we feel the environmental impact in the area is far beyond what we expect. I'd like to see if the County has done any type of environmental impact in this particular area of North Naples. That's number 1, and Number 2, when they were building the high school we talked at length with the County about the creation of that road and you guys just created about a mile long drag strip. If you live in our community on Friday and Saturday nights you would be surprised at the speeds these kids are going up and down that road. You've got a high school, a junior high school and a grade school and the people are driving unbelievable 100 miles per hour plus up and down that road. Something has got to be done. We have police that are showing up every day during peak hours, and then that's it; beyond that, we don't see anybody. So it's a huge problem for us in this particular community and by adding this type of retail facilities we just think its going to get worse. So that's just a comment that I have. Beyond that, I'd like to hear more from the County. Response: (Chris Scott) Thank you. Question/Comment 4: (Bill Bowden, Mediterra Community Association) Good afternoon. I'm the general manager of the Mediterra Community Association which is located across the street. Thanks for having this meeting; I have a question and a comment. In the site plan, it was kind of hard to read, I can make out where the gas station is, can you tell me how many of the square feet of the 50,000 will be for this gas station use? PL20220003225 and PL20220003226, Livingston Veterans Commercial GMPA and PUDZ NIM Summary Page 3 Packet Pg. 292 9.A.1.c PENINSULA,, ENGINEERING Response: (Chris Scott) This hasn't been formally designed, but it would be a typical gas station with about 5 to 6,000 square feet. (Bill Bowden) So there would be a lot of opportunity for other uses. I've been with Mediterra for less than 2 years and I have seen a change and know that Veterans will punch all the way to US41. We also know that commercial development is imminent, and that piece of land is probably only good for some type of commercial; so we are aware of that. What we are concerned about is that the developer be aware of our concerns. That if something does go through, that it maintains aesthetically the community appeal that we all know. So that relates specifically to signage and landscaping. There is a new gas station, I think it's on Airport Pulling Road, and it is the most landscaped designed; you can't really tell it's a gas station. I don't think the developer wanted to do it; I think he was asked to do it. So from a neighborhood (cross talk — people told to take side conversations outside). We're very interested in the developer's regard for the aesthetics and that it not be a concrete jungle. (Chris Scott) Thank you. Collier County has supplemental standards for gas stations which require those heavy buffer requirements along the street frontages. There is also significant buffering requirements adjacent to residential zoning districts. So all sides of any proposed gas station would have those thick buffers with berms, where it does make it difficult to see into the site. Commercial uses outside of ... if a gas station goes in, that takes up a lot of the trips that are associated with it, so that would limit what else could go in. If there is a 5 to 6 thousand square foot gas station, then you are not going to see the balance of the commercial square footage being developed. I don't think the site is large enough and the trips associated with a gas station would not allow for it. Question/Comment 5: (Bud Stewart, Secoya Reserve Circle) On the slide you have there, it says maximum number of trips. Are you going to stop people when they go over the number? Response: (Chris Scott) Question is regarding the maximum number of trips. So every land use has a certain number of trips associated with it based off of what that land use is and the size of it. Whenever a development comes in to Collier County, they require a Transportation Impact Statement. It would identify the uses that are being developed and the size of the development and it results in certain number of PM Peak Hour Net Trips. The County monitors every development that comes in, so they keep track of the number of trips and if you propose something that goes over the cap, then you would need to propose something else or reduce the size of the development to stay within the requirements of the PUD. Does that answer your question? (Bud Stewart) (unintelligible) (Chris Scott) For those that are on Zoom and the recording, the comment was 'I've never seen a clean gas station after a week of it opening' and also there are going to be a lot PL20220003225 and PL20220003226, Livingston Veterans Commercial GMPA and PUDZ NIM Summary Page 4 Packet Pg. 293 9.A.1.c PENINSULA,, ENGINEERING more electric vehicles in the future which will make gas stations a less important use in the future. Question/Comment 6: 1 live in Mediterra. A lot of the discussion has been around traffic and I have two questions How current are the traffic studies and this will probably be a few years away, will there be additional traffic studies done with the intent to limit congestion with the continuing residential development around Livingston Road and North Naples? (Chris Scott) The Traffic Impact Statement that was initially done was fall of 2022.1 don't know if it was updated with the most recent submittal. There will be new Traffic Impact Studies done with any development proposal. It is at those times that they would review impacts and identify if any additional improvements such as turn lanes are necessary. (unintelligible) (Chris Scott) Sir, if you raise your hand I can bring you the microphone so you can be heard. If not, I can just summarize what you said. It was why not redo the study in February when there is more traffic as opposed to a study in the fall of 2022 when no one is here. Those studies are based on land uses that have been approved and they take into account the seasonal populations. The County has certain standards for what the traffic studies need to include. Questions/Comment 7: (Brad Overby) So, its interesting, when the County did the study for us (in regards to Veterans Memorial extension), it was determined by the engineer that no sound barrier walls were needed. Again, we hired, with Imperial, the same engineering group a year and a half later, and they determined that the sound was going to be way above what the County had estimated and as a result had to put a 14-foot tall wall all the way from our community all the way to the high school. And we had to work out with Stock, because of some legal issues, to pick up the cost. So to me, your Impact Studies, we need to know how soon those were done and how well they were done, because we used the very same engineering firm that you did and it came back double or three times the sound level. And that is very concerning for us as homeowners. So, I would like to know when those studies were done and how those studies were done. Response: (Chris Scott) It was fall of 2022 when the studies the current study was done. And they are all available on the County's webportal. The studies are reviewed by Collier County Transortation. I believe we had comments on the initial submittal and then made changes based on those comments. (Brad Overby) But you understand the concern. You get two different studies by the same engineer and get two different results. It's frustrating. (Chris Scott) Let me just clarify that the transportation engineers on this project are working for the developer and not for Collier County and did not handle Collier County's sound study. PL20220003225 and PL20220003226, Livingston Veterans Commercial GMPA and PUDZ NIM Summary Page 5 Packet Pg. 294 9.A.1.c PENINSULA,, ENGINEERING Question/Comment 8: (Susan Stephens) Earlier I had asked a question about notification letters. And should they have been mailed directly to my home? Second queston, I also asked a question if a person has purchased a home and it hasn't been titled yet then how would they know about the meetings because their property hasn't been titled yet. So, that's a concern. And third, I raised the issue that many of the residents do not live in the area full time and suggested that another meeting be held perhaps in November and I wasn't sure if there would be notice of that this evening or some notification at a later date. (Chris Scott) OK ... three questions. For the first question, if you are a property owner with 500 feet of this subject property, and you are listed with the Collier County Property Appraiser as the landowner, then you would have gotten a letter regarding this meeting and any future meetings from us. So, you might be outside of that 500 feet. All notification letters go out to property owners of record with the Collier County Property Appraiser's office. We get the list of names from Collier County GIS; we actually submit a request and they give us a list of names and addresses. We send them out for the NIM and the County would send letters for public hearings before the Planning Commission and for the Board of County Commissioners. In regards to having a second meeting, we are not proposing to having a second meeting. We are having this Neighborhood Information Meeting, which is required by Collier County. This meeting is being simulcast through Zoom. So people do have the opportunity to participate virtually through Zoom. Question/Comment 9: (Michelle Kroll, 15922 Secoya Reserve Circle) It's probably a rhetorical question, but how is this gas station going to benefit all of the residential communities within this area? Response: (Chris Scott) How you measure the benefit is really up to the individual. I know my wife asks me to fill up her car all the time and I would rather have a gas station that is within two -tenths of a mile than 2.5 miles. So, one, it reduces vehicle miles traveled; this will be a convenience retail use located close to the residents. If it is approved, I'm sure many of you will use this gas station. It is convenient to have that nearby. Same with a small restaurant or other service that would be close by. There are conveniences close by. I think a lot of the traffic you see is because all of the residents in the area have to drive two miles away just to get anything they need. So that does add transportation to the roadways. If you have something close by then it reduced the amount of traffic going back and forth all the way to Immokalee Road or Bonita Beach Road. Anyone else? With that I will check our Zoom chat and see if we have any comments or questions. I don not see anything. Response: (Norm Trebilcock, Zoom) Chris, this is Norm. I was just going to make one clarification on the question from the gentleman about the traffic study and timing of the study. The main thing is that the traffic data that we use is from the County's Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) — so that's where the County monitors traffic in the community — and we used the 2022 AUIR. They haven't adopted the 2023 AUIR yet, so we did use their latest collective background data. And the traffic data is what is on the roadways, for example Livingston Road — that is their data that we use and then we apply a growth factor to that in the future. In regards to the trip generation of the project, its based on PL20220003225 and PL20220003226, Livingston Veterans Commercial GMPA and PUDZ NIM Summary Page 6 Packet Pg. 295 9.A.1.c PENINSULA,, ENGINEERING the Institute of Transportation Engineers, which is a traffic standard to use as you've mentioned. So even though this study was created in August or something, we are using the peak data that the county uses in terms of the background traffic on Livingston Road for example. So I just wanted to clarify that as it relates to the question about the data used for the study. (Chris Scott) Could you all hear that answer? That was Norm Trebilcock who is our Transportation consultant. He was noting that the 2022 study that was done, utilized the 2022 Collier County Annual Update and Inventory Report which identifies the trips on the roadways. The County has not yet adopted the 2023, so the TIS that was done utilized the most up to date information available by the County. We also apply a growth factor to account for the growth that has happened in the area. And additionally, the trips that are associated with this project — those figures and numbers all come from the Institute of Transportation Engineers, ITE; they have a big book of all potential land uses so you can find the number of trips that are generated and what the peak hour is for each use. Thank you, Norm. I don't see any other hands going up or any other questions. Feel free to reach out to me by phone or email if you have any questions in the future. This is going to be resubmitted back to Collier County and once it gets scheduled for public hearings you will see an actual sign that is required by code show up on the property, and there will be new letters sent to the landowners within 500 feet. I'm sure your HOA's and Neighborhood Associations will also spread the word if you do not get a letter yourself. Thank you all for coming. End of Neighborhood Meeting. PL20220003225 and PL20220003226, Livingston Veterans Commercial GMPA and PUDZ NIM Summary Page 7 Packet Pg. 296 9.A.1.d Nancy Gundlach From: debbie@jspaide.com Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2023 9:14 AM To: Nancy Gundlach Cc: 'Jim Spaide'; debbie@jspaide.com Subject: FW: Gas Station Concerns EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Nancy Gundlach, My husband and I live 16457 Celebrita Court in Naples. We are writing to you regarding the proposal from Andrew Saluan (Livingston Veterans Commercial, LLC) to install a gas station at the corner of Livingston and Veterans. PL20220003226 While we understand that the owners of the property would like to develop their land, and we support their right to do so, we believe a gas station would be a poor choice for that location. This property is very close to several residential homes and apartments. Mr. Saluan is asking for rezoning and for deviations from existing setback regulations. Our primary concerns are the health -related risks associated with residential proximity to gas stations. I am including several links below to articles and studies that reference these concerns (which are pronounced for children). To summarize these concerns, gasoline is comprised of over 150 chemicals, several of which pose serious health threats. Benzene, a known carcinogen, is one of the chemicals in gasoline which is vaporized whenever someone pumps fuel into their vehicle. According to the World Health Organization there is no safe level of exposure to benzene. This toxin alone is associated with several cancers as well as lung, brain, and kidney damage. The NIH National Library of Medicine did an extensive study on the effects of residential proximity to environmental hazards and included gas stations on this list. Gas stations were in the company of nuclear power plants, toxic waste sites, crop lands with pesticide applications, highly trafficked highways and auto repair shops. They found increased risk of childhood leukemia, Hodgkins Lymphoma and brain cancer in children who lived close to a gas station. Please see the study below. While we understand there are setback regulations in place, new research from Columbia University Mailman School of Health indicates that the vapors from gas station vent pipes emit up to ten times the levels of benzene and other toxins that was previously claimed. The current setbacks may no longer be safe. Mr. Saluan is asking for deviations from even the minimal setbacks. This is hard to reconcile in an area that houses many families and several schools. We appreciate all the hard work you do to protect our community and keep our residents safe. We would appreciate your help with this issue. We wanted to make you aware of our concerns and to ask for your advice on what we can do to protect our community and our children. Sincerely, Jim and Debbie Spaide 203-984-2157 203-984-6381 Residential Proximity to Environmental Hazards and Adverse Health Outcomes Packet Pg. 297 9.A.1.d https://www.ncbi.nIm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3222489/ "Risk of childhood cancer was examined in relation to residential proximity to other sources of contaminants, including industries reporting under the US Toxic Release Inventory, petrochemical plants, gas stations, repair garages, nuclear power plants, and landfill sites and hazardous waste sites. Increased risk of childhood leukemia was found with residential addresses near gas stations, repair garages, and nuclear power plants. Children whose mothers lived near industries covered under the Toxic Release Inventory during pregnancy were more likely to have brain cancer, especially if the mother lived within 1 mile of a facility with carcinogen emissions." Gas Stations Vent Far More Toxic Fumes Than Previously Thought https•//www publichealth columbia.edu/news/gas-stations-vent-far-more-toxic-fumes-previously-thought "A study led by environmental health scientists at Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health examined the release of vapors from gas station vent pipes, finding emissions were 10 times higher than estimates used in setback regulations that determine how close schools, playgrounds, and parks can be to the facilities. Findings appear in the journal Science of the Total Environment" Is It Safe to Live Near a Gas Station? https://www.scientificamerican. com/article/is-it-safe-to-live-near-gas-station/ "Despite all the modern health and safety guidelines they must follow, gas stations can still pose significant hazards to neighbors, especially children. Some of the perils include ground -level ozone caused in part by gasoline fumes, groundwater hazards from petroleum products leaking into the ground" Benzene releases from gasoline stations - Implications for human health https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/publications/healthy-living/benzene-releases-gasoline-stations- implications-human-health.html "Air dispersion modelling was used to estimate annual average benzene concentrations attributable to gasoline station emissions for varying distances from the gasoline station fence line. Specific scenarios assessed include gasoline stations with baseline, median and high yearly gasoline throughputs. Air dispersion modelling was also used to estimate the average benzene concentrations at different distances from the gasoline station fence line during the 1-hour time of average -sized tanker truck unloading, assuming the absence of vapour recovery and vent valves. For both types of releases, it is concluded that the inhalation exposures to benzene attributable to gasoline station emissions may pose unacceptable risks to human health for the general population living in the vicinity." Residential Proximity to Gasoline Stations and Risk of Childhood Leukemia https://academic.oup.com/age/article/185/l/l/2631401 "Two of the 3 studies cited provided data separately for residential proximity to gasoline stations and risk of CL, and the third provided data for proximity to gasoline stations and automotive repair garages combined. With regard to residential proximity to gasoline stations only, Brosselin et al. showed that for total CL (acute lymphatic leukemia (ALL) and acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) combined), the odds ratio was 2.1 (95% confidence interval (Cl): 1.1, 4.0; based on 19 cases). This overall odds ratio for CL was a reflection of the ALL odds ratio being 2.0 (95% Cl: 1.0, 4.0; based on 16 cases) and the AML odds ratio being 2.5 (95% Cl: 0.7, 8.8; based on 3 cases). Thus, the study demonstrated a significant 2-fold risk for total CL, as well as for ALL separately." Exposure to Benzene: A Major Public Health Concern https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/329481/WHO-CED-PHE-EPE-19.4.2-eng.pdf?sequence=l "The main sources of benzene in the environment include automobile exhaust, industrial sources, and fuel evaporation from gasoline filling stations." Packet Pg. 298 9.A.1.d "Human exposure to benzene has been associated with a range of acute and long-term adverse health effects and diseases, including cancer and hematological effects. Exposure can occur occupationally, in the general environment and in the home as a result of the ubiquitous use of benzene -containing petroleum products, including motor fuels and solvents." Additional articles: Residential proximity to petrol stations and risk of childhood leukemia https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10275799/ Is It Safe to Live Near a Gas Station? Scientists Point to Numerous Health Hazards https://fossilfuel.com/is-it-safe-to-live-near-a-gas-station-scientists-point-to-numerous-health-hazards/. Packet Pg. 299 9.A.1.e (CHAPTER 8, COLLIER COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT) A zoning sign(s) must be posted by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent on the parcel for a minimum of fifteen (15) calendar days in advance of the first public hearing and said sign(s) must be maintained by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent through the Board of County Commissioners Hearing. Below are general guidelines for signs, however these guidelines should not be construed to supersede any requirement of the LDC. For specific sign requirements, please refer to the Administrative Code, Chapter 8 E. The sign(s) must be erected in full view of the public, not more than five (5) feet from the nearest street right-of-way or easement. The sign(s) must be securely affixed by nails, staples, or other means to a wood frame or to a wood panel and then fastened securely to a post, or other structure. The sign may not be affixed to a tree or other foliage. The petitioner or the petitioner's agent must maintain the sign(s) in place, and readable condition until the requested action has been heard and a final decision rendered. If the sign(s) is destroyed, lost, or rendered unreadable, the petitioner or the petitioner's agent must replace the sign(s NOTE: AFTER THE SIGN HAS BEEN POSTED, THIS AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE SHOULD BE RETURNED NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORKING DAYS BEFORE THE FIRST HEARING DATE TO THE ASSIGNED PLANNER. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER BEFORE THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, PERSONALLY APPEARED Christopher O. Scott WHO ON OATH SAYS THAT HE/SHE HAS POSTED PROPER NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 10.03.00 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE ON THE PARCEL COVERED IN PETITION NUMBER PL2o ZZoop ��5 � �L?oZ2goa ?j2.L�c 2600 Golden Gate Parkway OF APPLICANr OR AGENT STREET OR P.O. BOX Christopher O. Scott Naples, FL 34105 NAME (TYPED OR PRINTED) CITY, STATE ZIP STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was sworn to and subscribed before me this 21St day of February—, 2024, by Christopher O. Scott personally known to me or who produced as identification and who did/did not take an oath. KIM D. DAVIDSON =_°; •��`; Notary Public - State of Florida =� • i "5 Commission x HH 2O1826 My Comm. Expires Feb 19, 2026 Banded through National Notary Assn. My Commission Expires: (Stamp with serial number) 06 of Notary Public O5;0.- Printed Name of Notary Public Rev. 3/4/2015 Packet Pg. 300 9.A.1.e PENINSULA :NGINEERING LIVINGSTON ROAD/VETERANS MEMORIAL BOULEVARD COMMERCIAL INFILL SUBDISTRICT (GMPA-PL20220003225) LIVINGSTON VETERANS CPUD (PUDZ-PL20220003226) Public Hearing Sign Posting — February 21, 2024 yWy N d-.i BLVD ti {1 c 0 r a� c J In N N Cl) O O O N N O N J d M M) O ti N Packet Pg. 301 9.A.2.a � ie-ounty STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ZONING DIVISION — ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT - PLANNING & REGULATION HEARING DATE: MARCH 7, 2024 SUBJECT: PUDZ-PL20220003226, LIVINGSTON VETERANS COMMERCIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (CPUD). COMPANION TO GMPA- PL20220003225, LIVINGSTON ROAD/VETERANS MEMORIAL BOULEVARD COMMERCIAL INFILL SUBDISTRICT PROPERTY OWNER/APPLICANT AND AGENTS: Property Owner/Applicant: Livingston Veterans Commercial, LLC 4980 Tamiami Trail North, #201 Naples, FL 34103 Agents: Christopher Scott, AICP Peninsula Engineering 2600 Golden Gate Parkway Naples, FL 34104 REQUESTED ACTION: Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire Coleman, Yovanovich and Koester, P.A. 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 Naples, FL 34103 The petitioner requests that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider an Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, amending Ordinance Number 04- 41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which includes the Comprehensive Zoning Regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, by amending the appropriate Zoning Atlas Map of Maps by changing the zoning Classification of the herein described Real Property from the Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district and commercial professional and General Office District (C-1) zoning district to the Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) zoning district for a project to be known as Livingston Veterans CPUD to allow up to 100,000 square feet of gross floor area of indoor air-conditioned mini- and self -storage warehouse (SIC Code 4225), and up to 50,000 square feet of gross floor area of commercial uses including gas stations and car washes. LIVINGSTON VETERANS CPUD, PUDZ-PL20220003226 Rev. February 12, 2024 Page 1 of 16 Packet Pg. 302 9.A.2.a F') a M I I ('elebrito C PROJECT LOCATION Location Map LOCATION MAP TRACT L-66 i�ACT [j =� 7R u CJ o o EURT L P CE61BklfftB CT SITE TRACT 4 Q LOCATION Veterans Mcmoriai 6LVa — 0 rn c A RPLJL) [ALL R,ARPUD i ¢ � CONSERVATION ESMT I ' OR 5708 PG 22A5 F N 75 a71 AC Z I 441�M a b bAx -------- I I e � Petition Number: PL20220003226 Zoning Map Packet Pg. 303 Attachment: Staff Report Liv Vet 2-23-24 (27847 : PL20220003226 Livingston Veterans CPUD) 9.A.2.a VETERANS MEMORIAL BOULEVARD (PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY) COMPENSATIJ6 ACCEifiS POINT IN!I8uT Al -OF-WAY — ACCESS S TZO' ❑ 1 LANDSCAPE BUFFER c I , s IYPE Tj' } LAHOSCAPEBUFFER I91 POTENTIAL INTERNAL LQT LINE I& TYPE V J LANDSCAPE BuFFER 1 I � I r I EN nNc I, WAY 75'TYPE jr LIHOSCAPEBUFFER ZONING: ALLURA RPUD LAND USE: MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT d REVISED 2;21.202a I PRNMT.. TITLL O'A%CPX;LIB X0h1S' VEHICLlFRREDESTRAN IMiER-CONNECT (NO PUPGIc ACCESS) H ❑ W Z as �d4 l , J W J W Jgd W < Z ❑ W N LU dW W LEGEND - DEVIATION COMMERCIAL - WATER MANAGEMENT INTERNAL ACCESS POINT (NO PUBLIC ACCESS) o} EXTERNAL ACCESS POINT I P E N I f4 SULA7A coa ENGINEERINGA LIVINGSTON EXHIBIT `C' PU❑ LIVINGSTON VETERANS CPUD MASTER PLAN VETERANS o.:,sea: ,•.Iar or„� P-wcam-0mi COMMERCIAL. LLC �k„�„�„� P�luc-0o>I-0aT-Incr . . .. - 5nre, ya•hu T 2 MASTER PLAN LIVINGSTON VETERANS CPUD, PUDZ-PL20220003226 Rev. February 12, 2024 N M N N J 1` O Q. d co C O E z v Q Page 3 of 16 Packet Pg. 304 9.A.2.a NOTES: • PLAN I$ CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE • BUFFERS FOR FACILITIES WITH FUEL PUMPS AND CAR WASHES SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LDC 5.05-05 DEVIATIONS: MAXIMUM INTENSITY: MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY {GROSS FLOOR AREA}: • 100,000 SF SELF -STORAGE, INDOOR 50.0000 SF COMMERCIAL OPEN SPACE: REQUIRED: 30% PROVIDED: 30% DEVIATION 1: RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 5.05.05 D.5, WHICH REQUIRES DUMPSTER ENCLOSURES ASSOCIATED WITH A FACILITY WITH FUEL PUMPS TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM FIFTY -FOOT SETBACK FROM RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY LINES TO INSTEAD ALLOW DUMPSTER ENCLOSURES TO BE SETBACK 30' FROM RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY LINES, DEVIATION 2: RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 5,05.05.13,1., WHICH REQUIRES A MINIMUM SIDE YARD SETBACK OF 40' FOR ALL STRUCTURES ASSOCIATED WITH A FACILITY WITH FUEL PUMPS TO INSTEAD ALLOW A SIDE YARD SETBACK OF 15' WHEN LOCATED ON A SIDE LOT LINE THAT IS INTERNAL TO THE PUD. LAND USE SUMMARY: USE ACRES % OF SITE WATER MANAGEMENT t0.70 ACRES 15.0% PRESERVES t0.00 ACRES 0.0% LANDSCAPE BUFFERS ±0.60 ACRES 12.8% DEVELOPABLE AREA f3.38 ACRES 72.2% TOTAL SITE AREA i4.68 ACRES 100% PRESERVE CALCULATION: PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PRESERVE REQUIRED: 4.44-ACRES OF EXISTING 10% OF EXISTING NATIVE NATIVE VEGETATION VEGETATION ON -SITE X 0.10 = 0.44 ACRES PRESERVE PROVIDED '0.44 ACRES `PRESERVE TO BE PROVIDED OFF -SITE, MONETARY PAYM E NIT ALTE R NAT IVE (SEE EXHIBIT F. ENVIRONMENTAL) PROJECT: LIVINGSTON VETERANS CPUD ri rl : I 0HTERC11ErfrM0NB-'ITAN7: EXHIBIT'C' PI.JD LIVINGSTON MASTER PLAN VETERANS NOTES COMMERCIAL, LLC MASTER PLAN LIVINGSTON VETERANS CPUD, PUDZ-PL20220003226 MI r . 2 2 Rev. February 12, 2024 Page 4 of 16 Packet Pg. 305 9.A.2.a GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject PUD, consisting of 4.68E acres, is located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Livingston Road and Veterans Memorial Boulevard in Section 13, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (See the Location Map on page 2 of this Staff Report.) PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The petitioner proposes to rezone two parcels of land. The northernmost parcel consists of a 2.2± acre Commercial Professional and General Office (C-1) zoning district, and the southern parcel consists of 2.4± acres of Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district. The parcels will be combined and rezoned into a 4.68± acre Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) zoning district to allow up to 50,0000 square feet of commercial uses, including gas stations and car washes, and up to 100,000 square feet of indoor self -storage for a project to be known as Livingston Veterans CPUD. See Attachment A — Proposed PUD Ordinance. The Master Plan, located on the previous page of this Staff Report, depicts the area of proposed commercial development, vehicular ingress/egress, landscape buffers, and water management areas. The Master Plan also shows that 3.38± acres will be developable commercial area, .60± acres will be landscape buffer area, and .70± acres will be water management area. A minimum of 30% open space will be provided. To the north and northwest of the subject PUD is Veterans Memorial Boulevard and then single-family residences located within the Mediterra PUD, a golf course community. To the east and south of the subject PUD are multi -family residences located within the Allura RPUD. To the west of the subject PUD is an undeveloped Agricultural parcel. Potential vehicular and pedestrian interconnection is shown on the Master Plan to the Allura RPUD parcel to the east in the future event shared access is desired. The proposed PUD boundary setbacks are 25 feet. The petitioner proposes a maximum zoned height of 35 feet and an actual building height of 45 feet. There is a proposed 15-foot wide Type D Landscape Buffer (trees 30 feet on center and a 2-foot tall hedge) along Livingston Road and Veterans Memorial Parkway. A 15-foot wide Landscape Buffer (trees 25 feet on center and a hedge, fence, or wall) is proposed along the Allura RPUD property. SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: North: Veterans Memorial Boulevard, a 4-lane local road, and then single-family residential with a zoning designation of Mediterra PUD East: Multi -family residential with a zoning designation of Allura RPUD South: Multi -family residential with a zoning designation of Allura RPUD West: Livingston Road, a 6-lane divided arterial road, and then undeveloped land with a zoning designation of Rural Agriculture (A) LIVINGSTON VETERANS CPUD, PUDZ-PL20220003226 Rev. February 12, 2024 Page 5 of 16 Packet Pg. 306 9.A.2.a AERIAL PHOTO GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: Comprehensive Planning staff has reviewed the proposed PUD Rezone and has found the subject rezone petition is currently not consistent with the GMP. A companion Small Scale GMPA petition (PL20220003225) proposes to redesignate the southern parcel from Urban Residential to Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard Commercial Infill Subdistrict and to expand the permitted commercial intensity to allow all uses proposed in the CPUD. Comprehensive Planning staff recommends approval with the following condition: • Reduce the total permitted commercial intensity of the subdistrict to 100,000 square feet or less. Approval of this PUD Rezone petition is contingent upon the companion GMPA petition being approved and becoming effective. For further information, please see Attachment B-GMP Consistency Review Memorandum. LIVINGSTON VETERANS CPUD, PUDZ-PL20220003226 Rev. February 12, 2024 Page 6 of 16 Packet Pg. 307 9.A.2.a Transportation Element: In evaluating this project, staff reviewed the applicant's April 4, 2023, Traffic Impact Statement for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) using the 2022 and 2023 Annual Update and Inventory Reports (AUIR). Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP states: "The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occurs: a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and c. For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project's significant impacts on all roadways. " Staff finding: According to the TIS provided with this petition the proposed development will generate a projected total of +/- 225 PM peak hour, 2-way trips on the adjacent roadway segments of Livingston Road. The trips generated by this development will occur on the following adjacent roadway link: Link/Roadway Link Current Peak Projected 2022 AUIR 2023 AUIR Hour Peak P.M. Peak LOS/ LOS/ Direction Hour/Peak Remaining Remaining Volume/Peak Direction Capacity Capacity Direction Project Trips (1) Livingston Site/Veteran's 3,000/North 45/North C/ C/ Road Memorial to 969 1,197 Imperial St. 51.0/Livingston Imperial St to 3,000/North 58/North C/ C/ Road Immokalee 969 1,197 Road LIVINGSTON VETERANS CPUD, PUDZ-PL20220003226 Rev. February 12, 2024 Page 7 of 16 Packet Pg. 308 9.A.2.a (1) Source for P.M. Peak Hour/Peak Direction Project Traffic is from the April 4, 2023, Traffic Impact Statement provided by the petitioner. Based on the TIS, the 2022, and the 2023 AUIR, the subject PUD can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan. The Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) indicates that the adjacent roadway network has sufficient capacity to accommodate this project within the 5-year planning period. Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental review staff has found this project to be consistent with the Conservation & Coastal Management Element (CCME). The project site consists of 4.44 acres of native vegetation. A minimum preservation of 0.44 (10%) acres of the existing native vegetation shall be met off -site through a monetary donation to Conservation Collier. GMP Conclusion: The proposed PUD Rezone may be deemed consistent with the FLUE of the GMP subject to the adoption of the companion GMPA. STAFF ANALYSIS: Staff completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition, including the criteria upon which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in Land Development Code (LDC) Section 10.02.13 B.5., Planning Commission Recommendation (commonly referred to as the "PUD Findings"), and Section 10.02.08 F., Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission Report (referred to as "Rezone Findings"), which establish the legal basis to support the Collier County Planning Commission's (CCPC) recommendation. The CCPC uses these same criteria as the basis for their recommendation to the Board of Collier County Commissioners (BCC), who in turn use the criteria to support their action on the rezoning request. An evaluation relative to these subsections is discussed below under the heading "Rezone Findings and PUD Findings." In addition, staff offers the following analysis: Environmental Review: Environmental Services staff has reviewed the Plan Unit Development petition to address environmental concerns. A minimum 10 percent preservation requirement for the proposed project is 0.44 acres in accordance with LDC section 3.05.07. The Master Plan provides for off -site preservation of native vegetation in lieu of on -site preservation. LDC section 3.05.07.H. Lf allows for meeting the preservation requirements off -site, provided the preserve area is less than 0.5 acres. No listed animal species were observed on the property. This project does not require an Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. Transportation Review: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petition for compliance with the GMP and the LDC. Transportation Planning Staff recommends approval of the proposed PUDZ. Utility Review: The project lies within the regional potable water service area and the North County wastewater service area of the Collier County Water -Sewer District (CCWSD). Water and wastewater services are available via existing infrastructure within the adjacent right-of-way. Sufficient water and wastewater treatment capacities are available. LIVINGSTON VETERANS CPUD, PUDZ-PL20220003226 Rev. February 12, 2024 Page 8 of 16 Packet Pg. 309 9.A.2.a Any improvements to the CCWSD's water or wastewater systems necessary to provide sufficient capacity to serve the project will be the responsibility of the owner/developer and will be conveyed to the CCWSD at no cost to the County at the time of utility acceptance. Zoning and Land Development Review: FLUE Policy 5.4 requires new land uses to be compatible with and complementary to the surrounding land uses. In reviewingtppropriateness of the requested uses and intensity on the subject site, the compatibility analysis included a review of the subject proposal comparing it to surrounding or nearby properties as to allowed use: intensities and densities: development standards (building heights, setbacks, landscape buffers, etc.). building mass: building location and orientation: architectural features: amount and type of open space: and location. Staff believes that the proposed development will be compatible with and complementary to the surrounding land uses with the recommended 50,000 square feet reduction requested in the companion GMP-amendment. Staff offers the following analysis of this project: The petitioner proposes to rezone 4.68± acres from a Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district and a Commercial Professional and General Office (C-1) zoning district to a Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) zoning district to allow up to 50,0000 square feet of commercial uses and up to 100,000 square feet of indoor self -storage for a project to be known as Livingston Veterans CPUD. See Attachment A Proposed PUD Ordinance. As previously stated, to the north and northwest of the subject PUD is Veterans Memorial Boulevard and then single-family residences located within the Mediterra PUD, a golf course community. To the east and south of the subject PUD are multi -family residences located within the Allura RPUD. To the west of the subject PUD is an undeveloped Agricultural parcel. Potential vehicular and pedestrian interconnection is shown on the Master Plan to the Allura RPUD parcel to the east in the future event shared access is desired. The proposed PUD boundary setbacks are 25 feet, which is the same as the LDC-prescribed front yard setback for commercial development. The petitioner proposes a maximum zoned height of 35 feet and an actual building height of 45 feet, similar to the LDC-prescribed building height for commercial development. The adjacent building heights in the Allura PUD are taller, at a zoned height of 40 feet and an actual height of 50 feet. There is a proposed 15-foot wide Type D Landscape Buffer (trees 30 feet on center and a 2-foot tall hedge) along Livingston Road and Veterans Memorial Parkway. A 15-foot wide Landscape Buffer (trees 25 feet on center and a hedge, fence, or wall) is proposed along the Allura RPUD property. The minimum code required 30% open space will be provided. Commitments have been made to minimize light pollution and noise to the adjacent neighbors. Should a carwash, automobile service station, or self -storage be developed, they will comply with the requirements of the LDC. REZONE FINDINGS: Staff offers the following analysis: LIVINGSTON VETERANS CPUD, PUDZ-PL20220003226 Rev. February 12, 2024 Page 9 of 16 Packet Pg. 310 9.A.2.a 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the GMP. The Comprehensive Planning staff has indicated that the proposed PUD Rezone can be found consistent with the GMP subject to the adoption of the companion GMPA if the overall square footage of the project is reduced to a maximum of 100,000 square feet. 2. The existing land use pattern. As described in the "Surrounding Land Use and Zoning" portion of this report and discussed in the zoning review analysis, the neighborhood's existing land use pattern can be characterized as mostly developed residential. The property located to the west of the subject site can be characterized as vacant undeveloped land. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. The subject parcel will not result in an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. The district boundaries are logically drawn in relation to existing conditions. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed rezone necessary. The proposed change is not necessary, but it is being requested in compliance with the LDC provisions to seek such changes because the petitioner wishes to expand the commercial land development area. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed PUD Rezone, with the commitments made by the applicant, can be deemed consistent with the County's land -use policies. Development in compliance with the proposed PUD Rezone and Staff requested 50,000 square foot reduction should not adversely impact living conditions in the area. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. The roadway infrastructure has adequate capacity to serve the proposed project at this time, i.e., the GMP is consistent at the time of rezoning, pending the adoption of the companion GMPA. Operational impacts will be addressed at the time of the first development order (SDP or Plat). Additionally, the project's development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought. LIVINGSTON VETERANS CPUD, PUDZ-PL20220003226 Rev. February 12, 2024 Page 10 of 16 Packet Pg. 311 9.A.2.a 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. The proposed PUD Rezone will not create a drainage problem. Furthermore, the project is subject to the requirements of Collier County and the South Florida Water Management District. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. The proposed PUD Rezone and corresponding Staff requested square footage reduction will not reduce light and air to adjacent areas inside or outside the PUD. 10. Whether the proposed change would adversely affect property values in the adjacent area. This is a subjective determination based on anticipated results, which may be internal or external to the subject property. Property valuation is affected by a host of factors, including zoning; however, zoning by itself may or may not affect values since value determination is driven by market value. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. The basic premise underlying all of the development standards in the LDC is that their sound application, when combined with the SDP approval process, gives reasonable assurance that a change in zoning will not result in deterrence to the improvement or development of adjacent property. Therefore, the proposed zoning change should not be a deterrent to the improvement of adjacent properties. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. The proposed PUD rezone can be found consistent with the LDC and the GMP subject to the adoption of the companion GMPA with corresponding square footage reductions. Thus, the proposed change can be deemed to be in alignment with public welfare and not a grant of special privilege. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. The subject property can be used in accordance with existing zoning; however, the proposed uses cannot be achieved without rezoning the property. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county. The proposed PUD Rezone with the Staff requested square footage reduction is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or County. LIVINGSTON VETERANS CPUD, PUDZ-PL20220003226 Rev. February 12, 2024 Page 11 of 16 Packet Pg. 312 9.A.2.a 15. Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. There may be other sites in the County that could accommodate the uses proposed; however, this is not the determining factor when evaluating the appropriateness of a zoning decision. The petition was reviewed on its merit for compliance with the GMP and the LDC, and staff does not review other sites in conjunction with a specific petition. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. Any development anticipated by the PUD Document would require site alteration, and this project will undergo evaluation relative to all federal, state, and local development regulations during the SDP and/or PPL processes and as part of the building permit process. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services is consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County GMP and as defined and implemented through the Collier County adequate public facilities ordinance. The development will have to meet all applicable criteria set forth in the LDC regarding Adequate Public Facilities. The project must also be consistent with all applicable goals and objectives of the GMP regarding adequate public facilities. This petition has been reviewed by county staff that is responsible for jurisdictional elements of the GMP as part of the rezoning process, and staff has concluded that the developer has provided appropriate commitments so that the impacts to the Level of Service (LOS) will be minimized. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. To be determined by the BCC during its advertised public hearing. PUD FINDINGS: LDC Section 10.02.13.13.5 states that "In support of its recommendation, the CCPC shall make findings as to the PUD Master Plan's compliance with the following criteria:" 1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. The area is suitable for the proposed commercial development with Staff s square footage reduction. The site has access from Veterans Memorial Boulevard. Water and wastewater mains are available along Veteran's Memorial Boulevard and Livingston Road. There are adequate water and wastewater treatment capacities to serve the project. LIVINGSTON VETERANS CPUD, PUDZ-PL20220003226 Rev. February 12, 2024 Page 12 of 16 Packet Pg. 313 9.A.2.a 2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for Rezones in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Documents submitted with the application provided satisfactory evidence of unified control of the property. Additionally, the development will be required to gain SDP approval. These processes will ensure that appropriate stipulations for the provision of, continuing operation of, and maintenance of infrastructure will be provided by the developer. 3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives, and policies of the GMP. County staff has reviewed this petition and has offered an analysis of the relevant goals, objectives, and policies of the GMP within the GMP discussion of this staff report. Based on that analysis, staff has found this petition consistent with the overall GMP upon adoption of the companion GMPA and corresponding recommended square footage reduction. 4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on the location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. The proposed landscaping and buffering standards are compatible with the adjacent uses. S. The adequacy of usable o_nen space areas in existence and as Drowsed to serve the development. The amount of open space set aside for this project meets the minimum requirement of the LDC 6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. The roadway infrastructure is sufficient to serve the proposed project, as noted in the Transportation Element consistency review. Operational impacts will be addressed at the time of the first development order (SDP), at which time a new TIS will be required to demonstrate turning movements for all site access points. Finally, the project's development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals, including but not limited to any plats and or site development plans, are sought. Water and wastewater mains are available along Veteran's Memorial Boulevard and Livingston Road. There are adequate water and wastewater treatment capacities to serve the project. 7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. The area has adequate supporting infrastructure, including road capacity, water, and sewer, to accommodate this project. LIVINGSTON VETERANS CPUD, PUDZ-PL20220003226 Rev. February 12, 2024 Page 13 of 16 Packet Pg. 314 9.A.2.a 8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on the determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to the literal application of such regulations. This criterion essentially requires an evaluation of the extent to which development standards and deviations proposed for this PUD depart from development standards that would be required for the most similar conventional zoning district. The petitioner is seeking two deviations from the Land Development Code. Please refer to the Deviation Discussion portion of the staff report below for a more extensive examination of the deviations. Deviation Discussion: The petitioner is seeking two deviations from the requirements of the LDC. The deviations are directly extracted from PUD Exhibit E. The petitioner's rationale, and staff analysis/recommendation are outlined below. Deviation #1 Deviation #1 requests relief from LDC Section 5.05.05 D.5. which requires dumpster enclosures associated with a facility with fuel pumps to provide a minimum 50-foot setback from residential property lines to instead allow dumpster enclosures to be setback 30 feet from residential property lines. Petitioner's Justification: The petitioner states the following in support of the deviation: The proposed CPUD is an infill commercial development that is bounded by Livingston Road and Veterans Memorial Boulevard to the west and north, respectively, and by the existing Allura RPUD to the south and east. The property has limited depth, measuring approximately 300 feet from the Livingston Road right-of-way to the residential property line on the eastern boundary of the PUD. Should a gas station (facility with fuel pumps) be developed on -site, the proposed dumpster will be aligned with the Veterans Memorial Boulevard driveway in order to provide safe and sufficient access approach for garbage trucks. This will allow garbage trucks sufficient area to maneuver without conflicts with other vehicles, pedestrians, structures, or gas pumps. The buffer between the proposed dumpster and the adjacent residential property line will be a minimum of 30 feet in width and include an 8-foot tall architecturally designed wall constructed on top of a berm. The berm will be maintained at a height of 3 feet. A 5-foot tall hedgerow consisting of #10 shrubs spaced three feet on center and a row of canopy trees spaced 30 feet on center will be provided on both sides of the wall as required by LDC Section 5.05.05 D.2. Additional shrubs will be provided on the outside of the dumpster enclosure. The reduced setback will not negatively impact the adjacent residential property. The apartments to the east of the potential gas station are approximately 155 feet from the LIVINGSTON VETERANS CPUD, PUDZ-PL20220003226 Rev. February 12, 2024 Page 14 of 16 Packet Pg. 315 9.A.2.a property line and are separated from the proposed CPUD by a surface parking lot, structured garages, and a maintenance building, in addition to their landscape buffer. Dumpster enclosures for other uses are permitted much closer than 30 feet to a property line, as they are exempt from setbacks per LDC 5.03.04.A.2., which states dumpster enclosures "may be located within a required yard (setback) provided they do not encroach into landscape area. " The proposed trash container will meet all other county standards as provided in LDC Section 5.03.04. A conceptual layout is provided, showing a potential gas station layout with the anticipated dumpster location. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Zoning and Land Development Review staff recommend APPROVAL, finding that, in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety, and welfare of the community," and LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h, the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is "justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to the literal application of such regulations." Deviation #2 Deviation #2 requests relief from LDC Section 5.05.05.B.1. and 5.05.11.B.1, which requires a minimum side yard setback of 40 feet for all structures associated with a facility with fuel pumps and carwashes abutting residential zoning districts to instead allow a side yard setback of 15 feet when located on a side lot line that is internal to the PUD. Petitioner's Justification: The petitioner states the following in support of the deviation: The proposed CPUD currently consists of two parcels but will be developed as a single Site Development Plan (SDP) with shared infrastructure facilities. Since this will be a unified site, an increased setback -from the internal property line is not warranted. The facility with fuel pump structures will meet the increased setbacks to external property lines, except as noted within these deviations. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Zoning and Land Development Review staff recommend APPROVAL, finding that, in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety, and welfare of the community," and LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h, the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is "justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to the literal application of such regulations." NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): The applicant conducted a NIM meeting on October 24, 2023, at the Collier County Library Headquarters Branch Sugden Theater, located at 2385 Orange Blossom Road, Naples, Florida. Approximately 13 people were in attendance and four people attended virtually. For further information please see Attachment C-NIM Summary. LIVINGSTON VETERANS CPUD, PUDZ-PL20220003226 Rev. February 12, 2024 Page 15 of 16 Packet Pg. 316 9.A.2.a Staff has received one letter of concern. Please see Attachment D-Letter of Concern. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney's Office reviewed the Staff Report for this petition on February 6, 2024. RECOMMENDATION: Planning and Zoning Review staff recommends that the CCPC forward PUDZ-PL20220003226, Livingston Veterans CPUD to the BCC with a recommendation of approval subject to the adoption of the companion GMPA-PL20220003225, Livingston/Veterans Memorial Boulevard Commercial Infill Subdistrict, with the following condition: • Reduce the total permitted commercial intensity of the subdistrict to 100,000 square feet or less. Attachments: Attachment A -Proposed PUD Ordinance Attachment B-GMP Consistency Review Memorandum Attachment C-NIM Summary Attachment D-Letter of Concern Attachment E-Application LIVINGSTON VETERANS CPUD, PUDZ-PL20220003226 Rev. February 12, 2024 Page 16 of 16 Packet Pg. 317 9.A.2.b ORDINANCE NO. 2024- AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 04-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH INCLUDES THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM THE RURAL AGRICULTURAL (A) ZONING DISTRICT AND COMMERCIAL PROFESSIONAL AND GENERAL OFFICE DISTRICT (C-1) ZONING DISTRICT, TO THE COMMERCIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (CPUD) ZONING DISTRICT FOR A PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS LIVINGSTON VETERANS CPUD TO ALLOW UP TO 100,000 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF INDOOR AIR-CONDITIONED MINI- AND SELF - STORAGE WAREHOUSE (SIC CODE 4225), AND UP TO 50,000 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF COMMERCIAL USES INCLUDING GAS STATIONS AND CAR WASHES; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF ORDINANCE NO. 2006-23; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST INTERSECTION OF LIVINGSTON ROAD AND VETERANS MEMORIAL BOULEVARD IN SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 4.68E ACRES. [PL20220003226] WHEREAS, Chris Scott, AICP, of Peninsula Engineering, Inc., and Rich Yovanovich, Esq., of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, representing Livingston Veterans Commercial, LLC, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: [23-CPS-02309/1843096/1] 83 PL20220003226 Livingston Veterans CPUD 022124 Page 1 of 2 Packet Pg. 318 9.A.2.b SECTION ONE: The zoning classification of the herein described real property located in Section 13, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from the Rural Agricultural (A) Zoning District and Commercial Professional and General Office (C-1) Zoning District, to Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) Zoning District for a project known as Livingston Veterans CPUD, in accordance with Exhibits A through F, attached hereto and incorporated herein and by reference made part hereof. The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps, as described in Ordinance Number 04-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, is/are hereby amended accordingly. SECTION TWO: Ordinance No. 2006-23, a rezone to C-1, is repealed in its entirety. SECTION THREE: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State and on the date that the Growth Management Plan Amendment in Ordinance No. 2024- becomes effective. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super -majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this day of 2024. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: Deputy Clerk Chris Hall, Chairman Approved as to form and legality: Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney Attachments: Exhibit A - List of Permitted Uses Exhibit B - Development Standards Exhibit C - Master Plan Exhibit D - Legal Description Exhibit E — List of Deviations Exhibit F - List of Developer Commitments Page 2 of 2 Packet Pg. 319 9.A.2.b EXHIBIT A LIVINGSTON VETERANS CPUD PERMITTED USES A maximum of 50,000 square feet of gross commercial floor area and 100,000 square feet of gross floor area of indoor self -storage shall be permitted within the CPUD. The uses are subject to the trip cap identified in Exhibit F, Section 3.a of this PUD. COMMERCIAL: A. Principal Uses: 1. All permitted uses in the C-1, Commercial Professional and General Office Zoning District of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) in effect at adoption of this ordinance 2. Amusement and Recreation Services (SIC 7911, 7991, 7999 limited to gymnastics, judo, karate and yoga instruction) 3. Apparel and Accessory Stores (SIC 5611-5699) 4. Banks, Credit Unions and Trusts (SIC 6011-6099) 5. Business Services (SIC 7334-7336, 7389 limited to drafting service, interior design, notary, and paralegal services) 6. Candy, Nut and Confectionery Stores (SIC 5441) 7. Carwash (7542), subject to LDC Section 5.05.11 except as deviated from in Exhibit E 8. Convenience Stores (SIC 5411) 9. Eating Places (SIC 5812) 10. Food Stores (SIC 5411-5499) 11. Gasoline Service Stations (SIC 5541), subject to LDC Section 5.05.05 except as deviated from in Exhibit E 12. Jewelry Stores (SIC 5944) 13. Membership Organizations (SIC 8611-8651) 14. Miscellaneous Retail (SIC 5992, 5994-5995) 15. Motor freight transportation and warehousing (4225, indoor air-conditioned mini- and self - storage warehousing only) 16. Museums and Art Galleries (SIC 8412) 17. Paint, Glass and Wallpaper Stores (SIC 5231) Livingston Veterans CPUD, PL20220003226 Last Revised 212112024 P Packet Pg. 320 9.A.2.b 18. Personal Services (7212, 7216, 7219 and 7221) 19. Any other principal use, which is comparable in nature with permitted principal uses in the C- 1 through C-3 zoning designations, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals ("BZA") or the Hearing Examiner. Motor freight transportation and warehousing (4225, Indoor air- conditioned mini- and self -storage warehousing only) is not eligible for a Comparable Use Determination as defined in the Collier County Land Development Code. Accessory Uses: Uses and structures that are accessory and incidental to the permitted uses within this CPUD document. Water management facilities to serve the project such as lakes. Livingston Veterans CPUD, PL20220003226 Last Revised 212112024 P Packet Pg. 321 9.A.2.b EXHIBIT B LIVINGSTON VETERANS CPUD DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The table below sets forth the development standards for land uses within the Livingston Veterans CPUD. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable section of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or subdivision plat. PRINCIPAL USES ACCESSORY USES MINIMUM LOT AREA 10,000 sf N/A MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 100 ft N/A MINIMUM YARDS (External) From Livingston Rd Right -of -Way 25 ft 25 ft From Veterans Memorial Blvd Right -of -Way 25 ft 25 ft From Eastern PUD Boundary 25 ft 25 ft From Southern PUD Boundary 25 ft 25 ft MINIMUM YARDS (Internal) Front 20 ft 10 ft Side loft 10 ft Rear loft 10 ft Lake (measured from Control Elevation) 25 ft 20 ft MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES 15 ft 10 ft MAXIMUM HEIGHT ZONED ACTUAL ZONED ACTUAL 35 ft 45 ft 35 ft 45 ft MINIMUM FLOOR AREA 1,000 sf N/A 1 Setbacks for Facilities with Fuel Pumps and Carwashes are subject to standards of LDC Section 5.05.05 and 5.05.11, respectively, except as specified within Exhibit E, Deviations from the LDC Livingston Veterans CPUD, PL20220003226 Last Revised 212112024 P Packet Pg. 322 I 9.A.2.b I e A REVISED 2/21/2024 PENINSULA, ENGINEERINGA CI VII ENCINEERI\G LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING LAND PLANN I NG SITE PLANNING CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT OWNER REPRESENTATIVE 2Gco Golden Gaye Parkway NaPIc,, Flarida 34 ') Phone'. 23-03,17" Fax: 239.2 7H ] Emil info®uen-en¢.com Websne: www.uen-enK.com Q Q O ZC? O= U ry (� U Z m >CL J COMPENSATING RIGHT-OF-WAY PROJECT: VETERANS MEMORIAL BOULEVARD (PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY) COMPENSATING RIGHT IN / RIGHT OUT RIGHT-OF-WAY ACCESS POINT �15' TYPED' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 15' TYPE 'D' LANDSCAPE BUFFER C POTENTIAL INTERNAL LOT LINE 15' TYPE'B' LANDSCAPE BUFFER C it J LIVINGSTON VETERANS CPUD 15' TYPE 'B' LANDSCAPE BUFFER ZONING: ALLURA RPUD LAND USE: MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT TITLE: EXHIBIT'C' PUD MASTER PLAN VEHICULAR/PEDESTRIAN INTER -CONNECT (NO PUBLIC ACCESS) ZONING: ALLURA RPUD Li USE: MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMI OWNER/CLI ENT/CONSULTANT: I C!-_`Cn1r-A X] - DEVIATION C - COMMERCIAL ® - WATER MANAGEMENT INTERNAL ACCESS POINT (NO PUBLIC ACCESS) 000 EXTERNAL ACCESS POINT LIVINGSTON VETERANS COMMERCIAL, LLC SEC: 13 TWP:48 RGE: Designed by: Drawn by: Date: Drawing Scale: 1" - Project Number: P-LIVC-001 File Number: P-LIVC-001-001-MCP Sb= Packet Pg. 323 NOTES: • PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE • BUFFERS FOR FACILITIES WITH FUEL PUMPS AND CAR WASHES SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LDC 5.05.05 DEVIATIONS: MAXIMUM INTENSITY: MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY (GROSS FLOOR AREA): • 100,000 SF SELF -STORAGE, INDOOR • 50,0000 SF COMMERCIAL OPEN SPACE: REQUIRED: 30% PROVIDED: 30% DEVIATION 1: RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 5.05.05 D.5. WHICH REQUIRES DUMPSTER ENCLOSURES ASSOCIATED WITH A FACILITY WITH FUEL PUMPS TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM FIFTY -FOOT SETBACK FROM RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY LINES TO INSTEAD ALLOW DUMPSTER ENCLOSURES TO BE SETBACK 30, FROM RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY LINES. DEVIATION 2: RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 5.05.05.B.1., WHICH REQUIRES A MINIMUM SIDE YARD SETBACK OF 40' FOR ALL STRUCTURES ASSOCIATED WITH A FACILITY WITH FUEL PUMPS TO INSTEAD ALLOW A SIDE YARD SETBACK OF 15' WHEN LOCATED ON A SIDE LOT LINE THAT IS INTERNAL TO THE PUD. PENINSULA ENGINEERING CI VIL ENGINEERING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING LAND PLANNING; SITE PLANNING CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT - OWNER REPRESENTATIVE 2600 Golden Gate Parkway Naples, Florida 34105 Ph— 239.403,6700 Fax: 21 261A797 Email: info®pen R._ WCWLi : www.uen-enK.com LAND USE SUMMARY: USE ACRES % OF SITE WATER MANAGEMENT ±0.70 ACRES 15.0% PRESERVES ±0.00 ACRES 0.0% LANDSCAPE BUFFERS ±0.60 ACRES 12.8% DEVELOPABLE AREA ±3.38 ACRES 72.2% TOTAL SITE AREA ±4.68 ACRES 100% PRESERVE CALCULATION: PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PRESERVE REQUIRED: 4.44-ACRES OF EXISTING 10% OF EXISTING NATIVE NATIVE VEGETATION VEGETATION ON -SITE X 0.10 = 0.44 ACRES PRESERVE PROVIDED *0.44 ACRES *PRESERVE TO BE PROVIDED OFF -SITE, MONETARY PAYMENT ALTERNATIVE (SEE EXHIBIT F, ENVIRONMENTAL) PROJECT: LIVINGSTON VETERANS CPUD TITLE. EXHIBIT'C' PUD MASTER PLAN NOTES OWNER/CLIENT/CONSULTANT: LIVINGSTON VETERANS COMMERCIAL, LLC SEC: 13 TWP:48 RGE: 25 Designed by: COS Drawn by: JAW Date: 10/22 Drawing Scale: N/A Project Number: P-LIVC-001-001 File Numbers P-LIVC-001-001-MCP Sheet N Packet Pg. 324 9.A.2.b EXHIBIT D LIVINGSTON VETERANS CPUD LEGAL DESCRIPTION The northwest % of the northwest N of the northwest % of the northeast quarter of Section 13, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, less and except the parcel of land deeded to Collier County, a political subdivision, by deed recorded in official Records Book 2597, Page 1684, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Together with The southwest % of the northwest quarter of the northwest % of the northeast % of Section 13, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, less and except the parcel of land deeded to Collier County, a political subdivision, by deed recorded in official Records Book 2597, Page 1692, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Livingston Veterans CPUD, PL20220003226 Last Revised 212112024 P Packet Pg. 325 9.A.2.b EXHIBIT E LIVINGSTON VETERANS CPUD DEVIATIONS FROM THE LDC Deviation 1: Relief from LDC Section 5.05.05 D.S. which requires dumpster enclosures associated with a facility with fuel pumps to provide a minimum fifty -foot setback from residential property lines to instead allow dumpster enclosures to be setback 30' from residential property lines. Deviation 2: Relief from LDC Section 5.05.05.6.1., which requires a minimum side yard setback of 40' for all structures associated with a facility with fuel pumps to instead allow a side yard setback of 15' when located on a side lot line that is internal to the PUD. See potential internal lot line on the Master Plan. Livingston Veterans CPUD, PL20220003226 Last Revised 212112024 P Packet Pg. 326 9.A.2.b EXHIBIT F LIVINGSTON VETERANS CPUD DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS PUD MONITORING One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close- out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this PUD approval, the Managing Entity is Livingston Veterans Commercial, LLC, 5020 Tamiami Trail N., #112, Naples, FL 34103. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed -out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments. 2. MISCELLANEOUS All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development. b. Pursuant to Section 125.022(5) F. S., Issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. 3. TRANSPORTATION The maximum total daily trip generation for the PUD shall not exceed 225 two-way PM peak hour net trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP or subdivision plat approval. b. Vehicular and pedestrian interconnection will be provided to the east to allow private access to the Allura RPUD, consistent with the conceptual PUD Master Plan, Exhibit C. The final location of the access point will be coordinated with the adjacent property owner and a cross -access easement will be provided at time of the first Site Development Plan or Plat. The connection and supporting infrastructure will be constructed to the property line by the developer or successors or assigns prior to the first Certificate of Occupancy. C. If the PUD utilizes county right-of-way for any turn lane or access improvement, then the owner shall convey to the County, at no cost to County and free and clear of all liens and encumbrances, the additional road right-of-way by easement equal to the size of the right- of-way utilized by the PUD. The conveyance shall be completed at time of SDP or plat. Livingston Veterans CPUD, PL20220003226 Last Revised 212112024 P Packet Pg. 327 9.A.2.b 4. ENVIRONMENTAL a. The CPUD shall be required to preserve 10% of native vegetation. 4.44± acres of native vegetation exists on -site requiring a minimum preservation of 0.44± acres (4.44 x .10 = 0.44). A minimum of 0.44± acres of native vegetation shall be mitigated off -site in accordance with LDC Section 3.05.07.H.1.f. b. Off -site preservation mitigation shall be satisfied through monetary payment to Collier County. Funds shall be used by the County for the purchase and management of off -site conservation lands within the county. The monetary payment amount shall be based on the post development appraisal value per acre multiplied by 0.44-acres of required preserve, then multiplied by 1.25 to establish the endowment amount. The appraisal shall be performed by a state certified appraiser. In addition, the fee for initial exotic vegetation removal shall be paid by the applicant as established in the Parks and Recreation Division Fee Schedule. C. The monetary payment for off -site preservation mitigation and exotic removal fees shall be made prior to the preconstruction meeting for the Site Development Plan or final plat construction plans, whichever occurs first. 5. SPECIAL CONDITIONS a. No adult orientated sales are permitted. b. Outdoor amplified sound shall be limited to areas abutting Livingston Road and/or Veterans Memorial Boulevard. There will be no outdoor amplified sound between the hours of 10 p.m. and 8 a.m. weekdays and 11 p.m. and 8 a.m. on weekends. C. All pole lighting shall be limited to flat full cutoff shields. d. All indoor self -storage shall be subject to architectural standards of LDC Section 5.05.08 and shall have comparable design features with office uses. Overhead doors are prohibited from directly facing public rights -of -way or adjacent residential zoning districts. e. Carwashes shall provide enhanced landscape buffers adjacent to residential uses, consistent with buffer requirements of LDC Section 5.05.05.D.2. Livingston Veterans CPUD, PL20220003226 Last Revised 212112024 P Packet Pg. 328 9.A.2.c C:43C-r C:�o-94VILy GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION CONSISTENCY REVIEW MEMORANDUM To: Nancy Gundlach, AICP, Planner III, Zoning Services Section From: Rachel Hansen, AICP, Planner III, Community Planning & Resiliency Date: March 7, 2024 Subject: Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Consistency Review PETITION NUMBER: PUDZ-PL20220003226 PETITION NAME: Livingston Veterans Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) Rezone REQUEST: Rezone the subject property from Commercial Professional (C-1) zoning district and Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district to Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) to permit a maximum of 100,000 square feet of gross floor area of indoor air-conditioned mini- and self -storage warehouse (SIC 4225), and up to 50,000 square feet of gross floor area of commercial uses, including a gas station with convenience store and car wash. LOCATION: The ±4.68-acre subject property consists of two parcels and is located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Livingston Road and Veterans Memorial Boulevard in Section 13, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMENTS: The northern parcel of the subject property is designated Urban, Urban Commercial District, Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard Commercial Infill Subdistrict and the southern parcel is designated Urban, Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict, all as depicted on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) and addressed in the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP). A companion Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) proposes to add the southern parcel (±2.39 acres) to the existing Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard Commercial Infill Subdistrict (currently ±2.25 acres). The Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard Commercial Infill Subdistrict was established by Ordinance 2004-71 on October 26, 2004, to allow those office uses, medical uses, and financial institutions permitted by right and by conditional use within the C-1 zoning district. It was designed to serve surrounding residential uses and was limited to a maximum commercial intensity of 50,000 square feet and maximum height of 35 feet. The Urban Residential Subdistrict is intended to provide for higher densities in areas with fewer natural resource constraints and where existing and planned public facilities are concentrated. Packet Pg. 329 9.A.2.c The proposed CPUD permits 100,000 square feet of gross floor area of indoor air-conditioned mini- and self -storage warehouse (SIC 4225) and up to 50,000 square feet of gross floor area of commercial uses consistent with C-1 through C-3 zoning districts, including a gas station with convenience store and associated car wash. Under the existing FLUM designation, uses of greater intensity than C-1 are inconsistent with the FLUE. The companion GMPA petition (PL20220003225) would redesignate the southern parcel from Urban Residential to Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard Commercial Infill Subdistrict. It would expand the permitted commercial intensity to allow all uses proposed in the CPUD. Certain Future Land Use Element (FLUE) policies are provided below, with staff analysis following in [bold]. Policy 5.6: New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code (Ordinance 04-41, adopted June 22, 2004, and effective October 18, 2004, as amended). [Comprehensive Planning staff leaves this determination to Zoning staff as part of their review of the petition in its entirety. However, staff would note that in reviewing the appropriateness of the requested uses/intensities on the subject site, the compatibility analysis might include a review of both the subject proposal and surrounding or nearby properties as to allowed use intensities and densities, development standards (building heights, setbacks, landscape buffers, etc.), building mass, building location, traffic generation/attraction, etc.] Policy 7.1: The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. [The Master Plan indicates points of ingress/egress from both Livingston Road, a major arterial, and Veterans Memorial Parkway, a collector.] Policy 7.2: The County shall encourage internal access or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals. [A vehicular/pedestrian interconnection is proposed at the eastern property line, connecting the subject site to the existing Allura multifamily housing development, which directly abuts the subject property to the east and south.] Policy 7.3: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and their interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. [As required by the Allura Residential PUD (Ordinance 2019-22), an interconnection is proposed which would connect to the Allura development. As mentioned previously, the CPUD proposes access to both Livingston Road and Veterans Memorial Boulevard.] Policy 7.4: The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities, and a range of housing prices and types. [Although this is primarily not applicable to commercial development, the applicant is required to provide Packet Pg. 330 9.A.2.c pedestrian and vehicular interconnection to the abutting multifamily housing, providing walkable access to the proposed project.] CONCLUSION: The rezone petition is not consistent with the GMP. A companion Small Scale GMPA petition (PL20220003225) proposes to redesignate the southern parcel from Urban Residential to Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard Commercial Infill Subdistrict and to expand the permitted commercial intensity to allow all uses proposed in the CPUD. Approval of this PUDZ petition is contingent upon the companion GMPA petition being approved and becoming effective. PETITION ON CITYVIEW Packet Pg. 331 9.A.2.d PENINSULA ENGINEERING Memorandum Date: October 11, 2023 To: Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA, CSM From: Christopher Scott, AICP RE: Livingston Veterans Commercial GMPA/PUDA (PL202200033225 and PL20220003226) NIM Summary A Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) was conducted for the above referenced project on Wednesday, October 4, 2023 at 5:30 pm at the Collier County Library Headquarters Branch, Sugden Theater, located at 2385 Orange Blossom Road, Naples, Florida. Approximately thirteen (13) individuals from the public attended the meeting (see attached sign -in sheet). The meeting was simultaneously conducted through Zoom, which had four (4) connections. Individuals associated with the project team that were in attendance included the following: • Christopher Scott, Peninsula Engineering • John English, Peninsula Engineering • Jenna Woodward, Peninsula Engineering • Ciprian Malaescu, Trebilcock Consulting Solutions • Andrew Saluan, Livingston Veterans Commercial, LLC Chris Scott opened the meeting at 5:30 pm and provided a PowerPoint presentation outlining the details of the proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment and Planned Unit Development Rezoning. Following the presentation, the meeting was opened to attendees for comments and questions. The following is a summary of the questions asked, and comments made, by the attendees and responses given by the project team. Question/Comment 1: (Edward Kant, 16360 Viarsa Way #301). 1 live in Talis Park. I don't have any questions or objections. I had the opportunity to download all of material from the County's website and one of thing that caught my eye was southbound left turn into the property off of Livingston which would be determined at time of Site Plan Development. I spoke briefly with Norm about that and my other concern is I wonder if that is the appropriate time to make that determination. I think that the stacking decision I think that it is important on this specific property given its location of the intersection, the new school traffic and the other developments that are being built around there that that be determined very early on. A: to see if it's appropriate and B: if so, what's it going to look like. The reason I'm concerned about it is because it's a very short turn now on that northbound left turn. Since the school opened it can be backed up at very peak moments. It doesn't last long, but its just long enough for people to say 'I wish they'd do something about traffic.' So I PL20220003225 and PL20220003226, Livingston Veterans Commercial GMPA and PUDZ NIM Summary Page 1 2600 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, Florida, 34105 Office 239.403.6700 Fax 239.261.1797 Fla Engineer CA 28275 Fla Landscape CA LC26000632 Fla Surveyor/Mapper LB8479 packet Pg. 332 L 9.A.2.d PENINSULAti ENGINEERING think if they are going to do anything with the southbound left turn then they need to evaluate the southbound stack and northbound stack as they could interfere with each other. If it sounds like I'm talking about trivialities, I must confess I'm a recovering traffic engineer and was the County's Traffic Director some time before. So that's the concern I have and only about that item. The other concern I have is if you look at the geometry of the recently finished east side of Veterans Memorial, where they're going to come out, it looks like and drives like a single lane but its obviously a through lane in there; they've got it gored out, and I have concerns about traffic coming in and out of that parking lot. Its an area that could create some issues; especially with the signaling timing. They did change the signal timing; there were issues but it now works. The school currently has about 800 students but is planned for 1,800 students. So that traffic is going to triple. We are very fortunate because the elementary school entrance is about a half a mile south on Livingston and that traffic is a nightmare sometimes. So, if there are going to be any adjustments to the access then I think that needs to be done as part of the rezoning. Response: (Chris Scott) Thank you. I just want to touch on this a little bit and I know Ciprian has a lot more knowledge than I do regarding transportation planning issues. I know with a zoning request, there are two transportation related studies that happen. One is done at time of zoning and one at time of Site Development Plan. Typically at time of zoning, the analysis that is done is identifying the number of trips going in and out of the development. And then at time of Site Development Plan they do a concurrency review and that is when they look at traffic lanes and the geometry and determine what improvements need to be made. (Ciprian Malaescu) Ciprian with Trebilcock Consulting Solutions. So only analyzing with the Traffic Impact Statement is about where the access is going to be based on access management policies to County standards. The County staff could go with asking for more restrictions. Question/Comment 2: (Susan Stephens, 15834 Secoya Reserve Circle) It wasn't clear to me when I looked at your drawings if you are planning for the addition of turning lanes off of Livingston? And secondly, with the growth of traffic that is assumed I'm wondering about your plans to put a turning lane on Veteran's Memorial onto the property. My second question, comment is that we live in a very seasonal area and I believe that many of our residents aren't even here yet and I'm wondering if this public meeting should be ... wondering if for the benefit of the majority of the people that live in the area, whether part time or full time, that they have the opportunity to be at the hearing; maybe have a second hearing at the end of November when all of the snowbirds are here. I think in fairness, I didn't get a notification except from my homeowners association. Your sign that is posted is not quite read -able unless you have 20/20 vision; I'm sure that was the requirement and you did your requirement but it was kind of listing and was not up for very long and I don't know the requirement on that. Thank you. Response: (Chris Scott) In regards to the turn lanes, this is the Master Concept Plan. You can see the hatching right before the entrances; those symbolize turn lanes as required by the County. Because this is a divided roadway, Collier County's access management plan does require turn lanes at the entrances. PL20220003225 and PL20220003226, Livingston Veterans Commercial GMPA and PUDZ NIM Summary Page 2 Packet Pg. 333 L 9.A.2.d PENINSULAti ENGINEERING The Neighborhood Information Meeting, we are required to have it after the first round of review comments. They do get letters sent to property owners within 500 feet, and as you mentioned, your community had sent an email blast to the residents. We do allow those who cannot make it to the meeting to participate through Zoom and we do have some folks on Zoom currently. There is not a signage requirement for the neighborhood meeting, so I'm not sure about that signage you are referring to. That signage wasn't us or anyone associated with this application. I don't know who put a sign up. (Unintelligible) (Chris Scott) Notifications go out to all owners on record with the Collier County Property Appraiser's Office. So if they have title to the land and they receive tax bills, they would get a notification. We utilize the Property Appraiser's land use records. Question/Comment 3: (Brad Overby, 15894 Secoya Reserve Circle) I'm the President of the Secoya Reserve Association. We have a number of our homeowners here tonight. Just a couple comments, more directed at the County. A lot of us have lived here for thirteen years; we built our homes in this particular development that we are in, and we've watched over these thirteen years a huge amount of growth in this North Naples area of land, development and forestry just being annihilated. And I can't find anything on any of the sites about the environmental impact of this area, of this community. What is being done with all of the development going on; and then, on top of that, now you're starting to add gas stations in other areas of commercial that a lot of us just don't understand. We've got all these facilities that are within a mile and a half of us; you go up and down Livingston and you don't see these types of facilities. We don't see the need for it, plus we feel the environmental impact in the area is far beyond what we expect. I'd like to see if the County has done any type of environmental impact in this particular area of North Naples. That's number 1, and Number 2, when they were building the high school we talked at length with the County about the creation of that road and you guys just created about a mile long drag strip. If you live in our community on Friday and Saturday nights you would be surprised at the speeds these kids are going up and down that road. You've got a high school, a junior high school and a grade school and the people are driving unbelievable 100 miles per hour plus up and down that road. Something has got to be done. We have police that are showing up every day during peak hours, and then that's it; beyond that, we don't see anybody. So it's a huge problem for us in this particular community and by adding this type of retail facilities we just think its going to get worse. So that's just a comment that I have. Beyond that, I'd like to hear more from the County. Response: (Chris Scott) Thank you. Question/Comment 4: (Bill Bowden, Mediterra Community Association) Good afternoon. I'm the general manager of the Mediterra Community Association which is located across the street. Thanks for having this meeting; I have a question and a comment. In the site plan, it was kind of hard to read, I can make out where the gas station is, can you tell me how many of the square feet of the 50,000 will be for this gas station use? PL20220003225 and PL20220003226, Livingston Veterans Commercial GMPA and PUDZ NIM Summary Page 3 Packet Pg. 334 9.A.2.d PENINSULA�W. ENGINEERING Response: (Chris Scott) This hasn't been formally designed, but it would be a typical gas station with about 5 to 6,000 square feet. (Bill Bowden) So there would be a lot of opportunity for other uses. I've been with Mediterra for less than 2 years and I have seen a change and know that Veterans will punch all the way to US41. We also know that commercial development is imminent, and that piece of land is probably only good for some type of commercial; so we are aware of that. What we are concerned about is that the developer be aware of our concerns. That if something does go through, that it maintains aesthetically the community appeal that we all know. So that relates specifically to signage and landscaping. There is a new gas station, I think it's on Airport Pulling Road, and it is the most landscaped designed; you can't really tell it's a gas station. I don't think the developer wanted to do it; I think he was asked to do it. So from a neighborhood (cross talk — people told to take side conversations outside). We're very interested in the developer's regard for the aesthetics and that it not be a concrete jungle. (Chris Scott) Thank you. Collier County has supplemental standards for gas stations which require those heavy buffer requirements along the street frontages. There is also significant buffering requirements adjacent to residential zoning districts. So all sides of any proposed gas station would have those thick buffers with berms, where it does make it difficult to see into the site. Commercial uses outside of ... if a gas station goes in, that takes up a lot of the trips that are associated with it, so that would limit what else could go in. If there is a 5 to 6 thousand square foot gas station, then you are not going to see the balance of the commercial square footage being developed. I don't think the site is large enough and the trips associated with a gas station would not allow for it. Question/Comment 5: (Bud Stewart, Secoya Reserve Circle) On the slide you have there, it says maximum number of trips. Are you going to stop people when they go over the number? Response: (Chris Scott) Question is regarding the maximum number of trips. So every land use has a certain number of trips associated with it based off of what that land use is and the size of it. Whenever a development comes in to Collier County, they require a Transportation Impact Statement. It would identify the uses that are being developed and the size of the development and it results in certain number of PM Peak Hour Net Trips. The County monitors every development that comes in, so they keep track of the number of trips and if you propose something that goes over the cap, then you would need to propose something else or reduce the size of the development to stay within the requirements of the PUD. Does that answer your question? (Bud Stewart) (unintelligible) (Chris Scott) For those that are on Zoom and the recording, the comment was'I've never seen a clean gas station after a week of it opening' and also there are going to be a lot PL2022000322S and PL20220003226, Livingston Veterans Commercial GMPA and PUDZ NIM Summary Page 4 Packet Pg. 335 9.A.2.d PENINSULA�W. ENGINEERING more electric vehicles in the future which will make gas stations a less important use in the future. Question/Comment 6: 1 live in Mediterra. A lot of the discussion has been around traffic and I have two questions. How current are the traffic studies and this will probably be a few years away, will there be additional traffic studies done with the intent to limit congestion with the continuing residential development around Livingston Road and North Naples? (Chris Scott) The Traffic Impact Statement that was initially done was fall of 2022.1 don't know if it was updated with the most recent submittal. There will be new Traffic Impact Studies done with any development proposal. It is at those times that they would review impacts and identify if any additional improvements such as turn lanes are necessary. (unintelligible) (Chris Scott) Sir, if you raise your hand I can bring you the microphone so you can be heard. If not, I can just summarize what you said. It was why not redo the study in February when there is more traffic as opposed to a study in the fall of 2022 when no one is here. Those studies are based on land uses that have been approved and they take into account the seasonal populations. The County has certain standards for what the traffic studies need to include. Questions/Comment 7: (Brad Overby) So, its interesting, when the County did the study for us (in regards to Veterans Memorial extension), it was determined by the engineer that no sound barrier walls were needed. Again, we hired, with Imperial, the same engineering group a year and a half later, and they determined that the sound was going to be way above what the County had estimated and as a result had to put a 14-foot tall wall all the way from our community all the way to the high school. And we had to work out with Stock, because of some legal issues, to pick up the cost. So to me, your Impact Studies, we need to know how soon those were done and how well they were done, because we used the very same engineering firm that you did and it came back double or three times the sound level. And that is very concerning for us as homeowners. So, I would like to know when those studies were done and how those studies were done. Response: (Chris Scott) It was fall of 2022 when the studies the current study was done. And they are all available on the County's webportal. The studies are reviewed by Collier County Transortation. I believe we had comments on the initial submittal and then made changes based on those comments. (Brad Overby) But you understand the concern. You get two different studies by the same engineer and get two different results. It's frustrating. (Chris Scott) Let me just clarify that the transportation engineers on this project are working for the developer and not for Collier County and did not handle Collier County's sound study. PL20220003225 and PL20220003226, Livingston Veterans Commercial GMPA and PUDZ NIM Summary Page 5 Packet Pg. 336 9.A.2.d PENINSULA�W. ENGINEERING Question/Comment 8: (Susan Stephens) Earlier I had asked a question about notification letters. And should they have been mailed directly to my home? Second queston, I also asked a question if a person has purchased a home and it hasn't been titled yet then how would they know about the meetings because their property hasn't been titled yet. So, that's a concern. And third, I raised the issue that many of the residents do not live in the area full time and suggested that another meeting be held perhaps in November and I wasn't sure if there would be notice of that this evening or some notification at a later date. (Chris Scott) OK ... three questions. For the first question, if you are a property owner with 500 feet of this subject property, and you are listed with the Collier County Property Appraiser as the landowner, then you would have gotten a letter regarding this meeting and any future meetings from us. So, you might be outside of that 500 feet. All notification letters go out to property owners of record with the Collier County Property Appraiser's office. We get the list of names from Collier County GIS; we actually submit a request and they give us a list of names and addresses. We send them out for the NIM and the County would send letters for public hearings before the Planning Commission and for the Board of County Commissioners. In regards to having a second meeting, we are not proposing to having a second meeting. We are having this Neighborhood Information Meeting, which is required by Collier County. This meeting is being simulcast through Zoom. So people do have the opportunity to participate virtually through Zoom. Question/Comment 9: (Michelle Kroll, 15922 Secoya Reserve Circle) It's probably a rhetorical question, but how is this gas station going to benefit all of the residential communities within this area? Response: (Chris Scott) How you measure the benefit is really up to the individual. I know my wife asks me to fill up her car all the time and I would rather have a gas station that is within two -tenths of a mile than 2.5 miles. So, one, it reduces vehicle miles traveled; this will be a convenience retail use located close to the residents. If it is approved, I'm sure many of you will use this gas station. It is convenient to have that nearby. Same with a small restaurant or other service that would be close by. There are conveniences close by. I think a lot of the traffic you see is because all of the residents in the area have to drive two miles away just to get anything they need. So that does add transportation to the roadways. If you have something close by then it reduced the amount of traffic going back and forth all the way to Immokalee Road or Bonita Beach Road. Anyone else? With that I will check our Zoom chat and see if we have any comments or questions. I don not see anything. Response: (Norm Trebilcock, Zoom) Chris, this is Norm. I was just going to make one clarification on the question from the gentleman about the traffic study and timing of the study. The main thing is that the traffic data that we use is from the County's Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) — so that's where the County monitors traffic in the community — and we used the 2022 AUIR. They haven't adopted the 2023 AUIR yet, so we did use their latest collective background data. And the traffic data is what is on the roadways, for example Livingston Road — that is their data that we use and then we apply a growth factor to that in the future. In regards to the trip generation of the project, its based on PL2022000322S and PL20220003226, Livingston Veterans Commercial GMPA and PUDZ NIM Summary Page 6 Packet Pg. 337 9.A.2.d PENINSULA�W. ENGINEERING the Institute of Transportation Engineers, which is a traffic standard to use as you've mentioned. So even though this study was created in August or something, we are using the peak data that the county uses in terms of the background traffic on Livingston Road for example. So I just wanted to clarify that as it relates to the question about the data used for the study. (Chris Scott) Could you all hear that answer? That was Norm Trebilcock who is our Transportation consultant. He was noting that the 2022 study that was done, utilized the 2022 Collier County Annual Update and Inventory Report which identifies the trips on the roadways. The County has not yet adopted the 2023, so the TIS that was done utilized the most up to date information available by the County. We also apply a growth factor to account for the growth that has happened in the area. And additionally, the trips that are associated with this project — those figures and numbers all come from the Institute of Transportation Engineers, ITE; they have a big book of all potential land uses so you can find the number of trips that are generated and what the peak hour is for each use. Thank you, Norm. don't see any other hands going up or any other questions. Feel free to reach out to me by phone or email if you have any questions in the future. This is going to be resubmitted back to Collier County and once it gets scheduled for public hearings you will see an actual sign that is required by code show up on the property, and there will be new letters sent to the landowners within 500 feet. I'm sure your HOA's and Neighborhood Associations will also spread the word if you do not get a letter yourself. Thank you all for coming. End of Neighborhood Meeting. PL2022000322S and PL20220003226, Livingston Veterans Commercial GMPA and PUDZ NIM Summary Page 7 Packet Pg. 338 9.A.2.d Livingston Veterans Commercial GMPA and PUDA (PL20220003225 and 3226) Neighborhood Meeting Sign -In Sheet Wednesday, October 4, 2023 5:30-7:00 Collier County Library Headquarters Branch, Sugden Theater PENINSULA ENGINEERING Name Address/Company Phone E-Mail co VA IC e_1 Ie° 110rp I c,� 1212 S ec_e.> Al va ( �� ^ t�/ �, �(% V ! �� '' , °) b % / l el LOA (X� 64 II � C'�N 1) S,� 6 i� b� aJ`:_ / - 7/ a l O Et ! . L A04 7 6, 1� 13 - _2S o .� 6 i-J rf= -7 Packet Pg. 339 9.A.2.d Livingston Veterans Commercial Livingston Road/Veteran's Memorial Blvd Commercial Infill Subdistrict GMPA and Livingston Veterans CPUD PL20220003225and PL20220003226 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING OCTOBER 41 2023 Packet Pg. 340 9.A.2.d NIM PROCEDURES Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) PENINSULA�� ENGINEERING r 0 • Presentation of the project and zoning request followed by questions N M O O N • Meeting is being recorded N O N J a • Use Microphone — One speaker at a time N • ZOOM Participants: • Please keep your speaker on MUTE during the presentation • Following the presentation, we will open the meeting for Q&A z U r c • Please type in questions using the "Chat" Tool. Submitted questions will be read aloud prior to response. a Packet Pg. 341 9.A.2.d WELCOME & INTRODUCTIONS PENINSIJLA� ENGINEERING r • Andrew Saluan, Livingston Veterans Commercial, LLC— Applicant .; • Richard Yovanovich, Coleman Yovanovich Koester — Land Use Attorney N N M O • Christopher Scott, Peninsula Engineering — Planning Manager N N O N J • Jenna Woodward, Peninsula Engineering, Inc. — Project Engineer 00 I- F14- • Norman Trebilcock, Trebilcock Consulting Solutions — Transportation Engineer z U r c d E t c� R r w El Packet Pg. 342 AIM_\I[S IF W',L- Legend - X10, Livi ng ston Rd -Veteran's Memcfial BAd Commercial I nff 11 Subdi strict- 4.13-acre� 'P wl- *_�Io J ob Ij In 99 10 1 dk to Ir 3c_ 9.A.2.d GMPA an PUDZ RE PENINSULA`S ENGINEERING r • Expand and Update Livingston Road/Veteran's Memorial Commercial Infill Subdistrict to include both parcels totaling 4.68-acres J co N N • Rezone from C-1 and Agricultural to Livingston Veterans Commercial N CPUD N 0 N J a • Limit permitted Uses to C-1 and select convenience retail and service uses to serve surrounding residential and institutional land uses M E E • Maximum 50,000 sf of commercial floor area and 100,000 sf indoor self- z storage floor area, subject to a trip cap E • Deviations to reduce setbacks for carwashes and facilities with fuel pumps and to allow directory sign E a Packet Pg. 344 9.A.2.d EXISTING FUTURE LAND USE MAP PENINSULA`S ENGINEERING r 00 ti N R E E m cn Z U c d E t R r w Q c E t v r r Q Packet Pg. 345 MEDITERRA RPUD '.% - - - +'� 4#;40 IIPO�- A ME�tTERR-A FZPbDl R L J74 L C-1 OW .01 Welerafis J""lary L School A ON RURAL AGRICULTURAL L U R-A RP U D amw EMSIFire Station m RURAL AGRICULTURAL 9.A.2.d PROPOSED USES PENINSULA ENGINEERING r • Uses allowed by C-1 Zoning, including office, barbers, beauty salons, child care N .; • Amusement and Recreation limited to gymnastics, judo, karate, yoga N N M • Retail, including Apparel and Accessory Stores, Candy, Food Stores, Jewelry N N Stores, Paint Stores, Florists, Newsstands, Optical Goods N J a • Banks, Credit Unions • Restaurants/Eating Places • Gasoline Service Stations and Carwash • Membership Organizations 00 N E z U c • Personal Services, including laundry and dry cleaning, photography • Indoor Self -Storage Warehousing _ E a Packet Pg. 347 9.A.2.d PROPOSED MASTER CONCEPT PLAN pEti,Ns„7:t n LIVINGSTON ROAD JPUBL IC RNAiT-O&WAY a ti r Z m� ZONIW: RPUD LAh#D USE: MULTI -FAMILY RESIDEHTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN ENGINEERING, LEGEND o - DEVIATION s -COMMERCIAL J N N - WATER o MANAGEMENT o N N INTERNAL 0 ACCESS POINT a EATERNAL ACCESS POINT 00 v R m^ // cn C Z U c d t w Q c �a Q Packet Pg. 348 9.A.2.d PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 7M, 10,000 sf 100 ft 25 ft 25 ft 25 ft 25 ft 20 ft 10 ft 10 ft 25 ft 15 ft ZONED ACTUAL 35 ft 45 ft 1,000 sf PENINSULAS m ENGINEERING I O. ACCESS r > N/A I o �► N/A N N M 25 ft O O O N N 25 ft O J a 25 ft '0 I- 25 ft v E 10 ft E cn 10 ft 10 ft 20 ft w 10 ft a ZONED ACTUAL 35 ft 45 ft a N/A Packet Pg. 349 9.A.2.d PROPOSED DEVIATIONS Deviation #1: PENINSULA�� ENGINEERING r 0 Relief from LDC Section 5.05.05 D.S. which requires dumpster enclosures associated with a facility with fuel pumps to provide a minimum fifty -foot setback from residential M 0 property lines to instead allow dumpster enclosures to be setback 30' from residential N property lines. Co N Deviation #2: E Relief from LDC Section 5.05.05.B.1., which requires a minimum side yard setback of 40' for all structures associated with a facility with fuel pumps to instead allow a side yard setback of 15when located on a side lot line that is internal to the PUD. E w a E a Packet Pg. 350 CONCEPTUAL LAND PLAN ow 7.jvu77.. W 33VIJ ilx uu TO wvmid i rn=Ldne oNv-ldn ISO LIVINGSTON ROAD EL-1 11y ?n Ai 46 4 m 11 PENlNSU=*.N,# ENGINEERING 'I T 2 W O ISCALE: 1'=89 14K (j) I I. - w 04 04 .i � G 04 04 Q c%j a. m r- 00 z m E E < co la 2 VA E LA L,bl R L u ff "IN I Packet Pg. 351 1 9.A.2.d PROPOSED CONDITIONS • Maximum 226 Two -Way PM Peak Hour Net Trips; • Interconnection to Allura RPUD to east; • Off -Site Preserve in accordance with LDC 3.05.07.H.1.f. • No adult oriented sales are permitted PENINSULA ENGINEERING r 0 J co N N Cl) O O O N N O N J • Outdoor amplified sound limited to areas abutting Livingston and/or Veterans 00 Memorial Boulevard and between 8am-10pm Weekdays/8am-11pm Weekends F14- * All pole lighting to utilize flat full cutoff shields E M • Indoor Self Storage, if provided, subject to architectural standards and have comparable design features with office use. No overhead doors facing public rights - of -way or adjacent residential zoning districts. • Carwashes, if provided, shall provide enhanced residential uses, consistent with 5.05.05.D.2. landscape buffers to adjacent a Packet Pg. 352 9.A.2.d ENHANCED LANDSCAPING LDC 5.05.05 PENINSULA`S ENGINEERING • 30' wide with Ttall undulating berm and 8' masonry wall r N • 5' tall hedge and canopy trees 30' on center g pY on residential side of wall • 5' tall hedge and canopy trees 30' on center on facility with fuel pump side N N M O N O N a _ _ S G9ST�511tr� .'v � Jr 1. k•y * 'lG.7v ' 17 •• �•r e��Ye �.t ' x • tr ti'y!�•- �r ' } " f • ��Ivit4 1 "� ' Fir •y lil' n�6p�.E � � 7 _ Uw 1'hK1YL , tltlMAl-'4±U r.��:.�.:, kUAftA xv�7E1WCf �r. I '� .� ,. •"SY/JIWf�fJMJi= +.+ ci I- I I- —I I II: M111'Gt wGIGn ut:Km a qaw swwae tdu sealrxa Y'y+tln61 II- I I w' I Aland!C ffAMAW-,iAkd EMO SCALE: V = id' t V Q Packet Pg. 353 9.A.2.d NEXT STEPS PUDA Application being reviewed by Collier County Staff ::* Collier County Planning Commission —Public Hearing Board of County Commissioners —Public Hearing Site Development Plan Submittal PEN INSULAZ� ENGINEERING Packet Pg. 354 9.A.2.d QUESTIONS PENIN 0 c J tD N N M O O O N N O N J d ti O ti N R E E 3 co 2 Z U c m E t v �a .r a E a a Packet Pg. 355 9.A.2.d STAY CONN EC -r r- r"% Chris Scott, Peninsula Engineering CScott@pen-eng.com 239-403-6700 Em ` [i] y PENINSULA-5� ENGINEERING N C 0 N .; J N N M O 0 O N N O N J d ti O ti N Packet Pg. 356 9.A.2.d Street Final Publication Date 2600 Golden Gate PKWY 9/15/2023 Gity Ad Number Naples GC11101624 State Publication FL Naples Daily News ZIP Code Market 34105-3227 Naples Your Name Delivery Method Mark Calago Both Email Address Number of Affidavits Needed mcalago@gannett.com 1 Customer Email KDavidson@pen-eng.com Customer Name Peninsula Engineering Customer Phone Number (239) 252-5333 Customer Address 2600 Golden Gate PKWY Naples, FL 34105-3227 United States Account Number (If Known) AP-585101 Name Kim Davidson Q M E E CO 2 z U c as E r a c a� E s Q Packet Pg. 357 9.A.2.d NapjtS 4])a*tjj NJCWS PART OFTHE USA TODAY NETWORK Published Daily Naples, FL 34110 PENINSULA ENGINEERING 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY NAPLES, FL 34105 ATTN KIM DAVIDSON Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WISCONSIN COUNTY OF BROWN Before the undersigned authority personally appeared, who on oath says that he or she is the Legal Coordinator of the Naples Daily News, published in Collier County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being a PUBLIC NOTICE, was published on the publicly accessible website of Collier and Lee Counties, Florida, or in a newspaper by print in the issues of, on: Issue(s) dated: 9/16/2023 Affiant further says that the website or newspaper complies with all legal requirements for publication in chapter 50, Florida Statutes. Subscribed and sworn to before me, by the legal clerk, who is personally Known to me, on September 15th, 2023: Notary, State of WI, County of Brown My commission expires: Cj�!-�-ir-7 DENISE ROBERTS Notary Public State of Wisconsin Publication Cost: $403.20 Ad No: GC11101624 Customer No: 58S101 PO #: PL20210000660 - DISPLAY AD 2X6 # of Affidavits: 1 This is not an invoice Packet Pg. 358 9.A.2.d NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING The public is invited to attend a neighborhood information meeting hosted by Chris Scott of Peninsula Engineering on Wednesday, October 4, 2023, at 5:30 p.m. at the Collier County Library Headquarters Branch, Sugden Theater, 2385 Orange Blossom Road, Naples, FL 34109. Livingston Veterans Commercial, LLC is seeking approval of a GMPA and PUDZ to add a ±2.4-acre Agriculture zoned parcel that fronts on Livingston Road to the existing ±2.2-acre Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard Commercial Infill Subdistrict and to rezone the entire +4.68-acres from C-1 and Agricultural zoning district to Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD). The applications allow for a maximum commercial intensity of 50,000 s.f. of gross commercial floor area and 100,000 s.f. of indoor, air-conditioned self -storage floor area, including deviations to setback requirements for carwashes and facilities with fuel pumps. The subject property consists of ±4.68 acres, and is located at the southeast intersection of Livingston Road and Veterans Memorial Boulevard, in Section 13, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. [PL20220003225 and PL20220003226). --- _ .. . SUBJECT PROPER) N Business and property owners, residents, and visitors are welcome to attend the presentation and discuss the project. If you are unable to attend this meeting in person, but have questions or comments or wish to attend simultaneously through Zoom, please contact: Chris Scott, Planning Manager, Peninsula Engineering, 2600 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, FL 34105 cscott@pen-eng.com (239) 403-6727. ND-GL11101624-01 Packet Pg. 359 9.A.2.d PEN INSULA`S ENGINEERING September 14, 2023 Dear Property Owner: The public is invited to attend a neighborhood information meeting hosted by Chris Scott of Peninsula Engineering: Wednesday, October 4, 2023, at 5:30 p.m. Collier County Library Headquarters Branch, Sugden Theater* 2385 Orange Blossom Road, Naples, FL 34109 * The Collier County Public Library does not sponsor or endorse this program. Livingston Veterans Commercial, LLC is seeking approval of a GMPA and PUDZ to add a +2.4-acre Agriculture zoned parcel that fronts on Livingston Road to the existing +2.2-acre Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard Commercial Infill Subdistrict and to rezone the entire +4.68-acres from C-1 and Agricultural zoning district to Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD). The applications allow for a maximum commercial intensity of 50,000 s.f. of gross commercial floor area and 100,000 s.f. of indoor, air-conditioned self -storage floor area, including deviations to setback requirements for carwashes and facilities with fuel pumps. The subject property consists of +4.68 acres and is located at the southeast intersection of Livingston Road and Veterans Memorial Boulevard, in Section 13, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. [PL20220003225 and PL20220003226]. WAY N / S 41 i EF�.Ns �ao SUBJECT PROPERTY N A Business and property owners, residents, and visitors are welcome to attend the presentation and discuss the project. If you are unable to attend this meeting in person, but have questions or comments or wish to attend simultaneously through Zoom, please contact: Chris Scott, Planning Manager, Peninsula Engineering, 2600 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, FL 34105 cscott@pencscott@pen-engcom (239) 403-6727. 2600 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, Florida, 34105 Office 239.403.6700 Fax 239.261.1797 Fla Engineer CA 28275 Fla Landscape CA LC26000632 Fla Surveyor/Mapper LB8479 Packet Pg. 360 9.A.2.d Notice: This data belongs to the Collier County Property Appraiser's Office (CCPA). Therefore, the recipient agrees not to represent this data to anyone as other than CCPA provided data. The recipient may not transfer this data to others without consent from the CCPA. Petition: PL20220003226 I Buffer: 500' 1 Date: 8/17123 1 Site Location: 00149720005 & 00150080006 NAMEIi NAME2 = NAME3 NAME4 NAME5 NAME6 BELAND, MICHAEL 16469 CELEBRITA CT NAPLES, FL 34110--0 MEDITERRA PHASE THREE EAST UNIT ONE COLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S NAPLES, FL 34104-0 12 48 25 LIVINGSTON ROAD RW DESC IN OR 2708 PG 1504 & OR COLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S NAPLES, FL 34104-0 13 48 25 W1/2 OF N1/2 OF SW1/4 OF SW1/4 OF NE1/4 AND CUMMINS, HOWARD&CINDY 16473 CELEBRITA CT NAPLES, FL 34110--0 MEDITERRA PHASE THREE EAST UNITONE ECKERLINE, PETER 1070 HUNTER DR WAYZATA, MN 55391--0 MEDITERRA PHASE THREE EAST UNIT ONE LIVINGSTON VETERANS COMMERCIAL LLC 4980 TAMIAMI TRAIL N #201 NAPLES, FL 34103--0 13 48 25 NW114 OF NW114 OF NW1/4 OF NE114 LESS LIVINGSTON LIVINGSTON VETERANS COMMERCIAL 4980 TAMIAMI TR N#201 NAPLES,FL 34103--0 13 48 25 SW114 OF NW114 OF NW1/4 OF NE114 LESS LIVINGSTON MEDITERRA COMMUNITY ASSN INC 15735 CORSO MEDITERRA CIR NAPLES, FL 34110--2706 MEDITERRA PHASE THREE EAST UNIT ONE MEDITERRA COMMUNITY ASSN INC 15735 CORSO MEDITERRA CIR NAPLES, FL 34110--2706 MEDITERRA PHASE THREE EAST UNIT ONE TRACT R LESS THAT MELINDA K GARLAND TRUST 16453 CELEBRITA CT NAPLES, FL 34110--0 MEDITERRA PHASE THREE EAST UNIT ONE NEW CLUB AT MEDITERRA INC, THE 15755 CORSO MEDITERRA CIR NAPLES, FL 34110--2706 MEDITERRA SOUTH GOLF COURSE PHASE TWO THAT PORTION OF SO LIVINGSTON LLC 2639 PROFESSIONAL CIRCLE STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34119--0 13 48 25, THAT LAND PORTION OF SEC 13 AS DESC IN OR 5708 SPAIDE, JAMES & DEBORAH 16457 CELEBRITA CT NAPLES, FL 34110--3265 MEDITERRA PHASE THREE EAST UNIT ONE TRINITY REAL ESTATE TRUST 1000 PINEBROOK RD VENICE, FL 34285--6426 13 48 25 E1/2 OF N1/2 OF NE1/4 OF NW 1/4 LESS LIVINGSTON WARD, PATRICK J & DIANE E 16461 CELEBRITA CT NAPLES, FL 34110--0 MEDITERRA PHASE THREE EAST UNIT ONE 2724 PG 503 AND OR 2801 PG LIVINGSTON RD AND ORDER OF BLK C LOT 2 BLK C LOT 4 RD DESC IN OR 2597 PG 1684 RD DESC IN OR 2597 PG 1692 TRACT Q PORT NKA TR R MEDITERRA PARCEL BLK C LOT 7 TRACT GC-2 AS DESC WITHIN PG 2250 BLK C LOT 6 RD DESC IN OR2619 PG 274 ORDER BLK C LOT 5 FOLIO ADDRESSTYF 59960212565 U 3029 00148040058 U TAKING CASE #99-3040 00150920001 U 59960212549 U 59960212581 U 00149720005 U 00150080006 U 59960211948 U 125 REPLAT PB 42 PG 55-56 59960211964 U 59960212646 U REFERENCED PARCEL"GOLF HOLE 59966001042 U 00148200005 U 59960212620 U OF TAKING CASE # 99-3040, AND 00148640005 U 59960212604 U U N L C 0 J O N N M O O O N N O N J d Do ti N Mailing List Packet Pg. 361 9.A.2.e Nancy Gundlach From: debbie@jspaide.com Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2023 9:14 AM To: Nancy Gundlach Cc: 'Jim Spaide'; debbie@jspaide.com Subject: FW: Gas Station Concerns EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Nancy Gundlach, My husband and I live 16457 Celebrita Court in Naples. We are writing to you regarding the proposal from Andrew Saluan (Livingston Veterans Commercial, LLC) to install a gas station at the corner of Livingston and Veterans. PL20220003226 While we understand that the owners of the property would like to develop their land, and we support their right to do so, we believe a gas station would be a poor choice for that location. This property is very close to several residential homes and apartments. Mr. Saluan is asking for rezoning and for deviations from existing setback regulations. Our primary concerns are the health -related risks associated with residential proximity to gas stations. I am including several links below to articles and studies that reference these concerns (which are pronounced for children). To summarize these concerns, gasoline is comprised of over 150 chemicals, several of which pose serious health threats. Benzene, a known carcinogen, is one of the chemicals in gasoline which is vaporized whenever someone pumps fuel into their vehicle. According to the World Health Organization there is no safe level of exposure to benzene. This toxin alone is associated with several cancers as well as lung, brain, and kidney damage. The NIH National Library of Medicine did an extensive study on the effects of residential proximity to environmental hazards and included gas stations on this list. Gas stations were in the company of nuclear power plants, toxic waste sites, crop lands with pesticide applications, highly trafficked highways and auto repair shops. They found increased risk of childhood leukemia, Hodgkins Lymphoma and brain cancer in children who lived close to a gas station. Please see the study below. While we understand there are setback regulations in place, new research from Columbia University Mailman School of Health indicates that the vapors from gas station vent pipes emit up to ten times the levels of benzene and other toxins that was previously claimed. The current setbacks may no longer be safe. Mr. Saluan is asking for deviations from even the minimal setbacks. This is hard to reconcile in an area that houses many families and several schools. We appreciate all the hard work you do to protect our community and keep our residents safe. We would appreciate your help with this issue. We wanted to make you aware of our concerns and to ask for your advice on what we can do to protect our community and our children. Sincerely, Jim and Debbie Spaide 203-984-2157 203-984-6381 Residential Proximity to Environmental Hazards and Adverse Health Outcomes Packet Pg. 362 9.A.2.e https://www.ncbi.nIm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3222489/ "Risk of childhood cancer was examined in relation to residential proximity to other sources of contaminants, including industries reporting under the US Toxic Release Inventory, petrochemical plants, gas stations, repair garages, nuclear power plants, and landfill sites and hazardous waste sites. Increased risk of childhood leukemia was found with residential addresses near gas stations, repair garages, and nuclear power plants. Children whose mothers lived near industries covered under the Toxic Release Inventory during pregnancy were more likely to have brain cancer, especially if the mother lived within 1 mile of a facility with carcinogen emissions." Gas Stations Vent Far More Toxic Fumes Than Previously Thought https://www.publichealth.columbia.edu/news/gas-stations-vent-far-more-toxic-fumes-previously-thought "A study led by environmental health scientists at Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health examined the release of vapors from gas station vent pipes, finding emissions were 10 times higher than estimates used in setback regulations that determine how close schools, playgrounds, and parks can be to the facilities. Findings appear in the journal Science of the Total Environment" Is It Safe to Live Near a Gas Station? https://www.scientificamerican. com/article/is-it-safe-to-live-near-pas-station/ "Despite all the modern health and safety guidelines they must follow, gas stations can still pose significant hazards to neighbors, especially children. Some of the perils include ground -level ozone caused in part by gasoline fumes, groundwater hazards from petroleum products leaking into the ground" Benzene releases from gasoline stations - Implications for human health https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/publications/healthy-living/benzene-releases-gasoline-stations- implications-human-health.html "Air dispersion modelling was used to estimate annual average benzene concentrations attributable to gasoline station emissions for varying distances from the gasoline station fence line. Specific scenarios assessed include gasoline stations with baseline, median and high yearly gasoline throughputs. Air dispersion modelling was also used to estimate the average benzene concentrations at different distances from the gasoline station fence line during the 1-hour time of average -sized tanker truck unloading, assuming the absence of vapour recovery and vent valves. For both types of releases, it is concluded that the inhalation exposures to benzene attributable to gasoline station emissions may pose unacceptable risks to human health for the general population living in the vicinity." Residential Proximity to Gasoline Stations and Risk of Childhood Leukemia https://academic.oup.com/a ie/article/185/1/1/2631401 "Two of the 3 studies cited provided data separately for residential proximity to gasoline stations and risk of CL, and the third provided data for proximity to gasoline stations and automotive repair garages combined. With regard to residential proximity to gasoline stations only, Brosselin et al. showed that for total CL (acute lymphatic leukemia (ALL) and acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) combined), the odds ratio was 2.1(95% confidence interval (Cl): 1.1, 4.0; based on 19 cases). This overall odds ratio for CL was a reflection of the ALL odds ratio being 2.0 (95% Cl: 1.0, 4.0; based on 16 cases) and the AML odds ratio being 2.5 (95% Cl: 0.7, 8.8; based on 3 cases). Thus, the study demonstrated a significant 2-fold risk for total CL, as well as for ALL separately." Exposure to Benzene: A Major Public Health Concern https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/329481/WHO-CED-PHE-EPE-19.4.2-eng.pdf?sequence=l "The main sources of benzene in the environment include automobile exhaust, industrial sources, and fuel evaporation from gasoline filling stations." Packet Pg. 363 9.A.2.e "Human exposure to benzene has been associated with a range of acute and long-term adverse health effects and diseases, including cancer and hematological effects. Exposure can occur occupationally, in the general environment and in the home as a result of the ubiquitous use of benzene -containing petroleum products, including motor fuels and solvents." Additional articles: Residential proximity to petrol stations and risk of childhood leukemia https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10275799/ Is It Safe to Live Near a Gas Station? Scientists Point to Numerous Health Hazards https://fossilfuel.com/is-it-safe-to-live-near-a-gas-station-scientists-point-to-numerous-health-hazards/. Packet Pg. 364 9.A.2.f PENINSULA`% ENGINEERING December 15, 2022 Collier County Growth Management Department Planning & Zoning 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 RE: Livingston Veterans CPUD PUDZ — PL20220003226 1' Review To Whom It May Concern, The following have been included for your review and approval: 1. Cover Letter 2. Completed Addressing Checklist 3. Pre -Application Meeting Notes 4. PUDZ Application 5. Affidavit of Authorization 6. Property Ownership Disclosure Forms 7. Covenant of Unified Control 8. Recorded Warranty Deed 9. Boundary Survey 10. Aerial Location Map 11. Narrative and Justification 12. Exhibits A-F 13. Proposed Master Concept Plan 14. List of Deviations and Justifications 15. Environmental Data 16. Traffic Impact Statement 17. Statement of Utility Provisions 18. Companion Livingston Rd/Veterans Memorial Blvd Commercial Infill Subdistrict GMPA (PL20220003225) Please feel free to contact me at (239) 403-6727 or by email at cscott@pen-eng.com should you have any questions or require additional information. Sincer ly, Ch istopher 0. Scott, AICP Planning Manager 2600 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, Florida, 34105 Office 239.403.6700 Fax 239.261.1797 Fla Engineer CA 28275 Fla Landscape CA LC26000632 Fla Surveyor/Mapper LB8479 Packet Pg. 365 9.A.2.f COlfler county Growth Management Community Development Department ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following and upload via the CityView Portal with your submittal. Items marked with (*) are required for every application, other items are optional and may not apply to every project. Forms are valid for 6 months following their submittal; an updated form will be required for a new submittal after that timeframe and any time the properties within the project boundary are modified. Additional documents may be attached to this form and can include: - * LOCATION MAP and/or SURVEY showing the proposed project boundary. - List of additional folio numbers and associated legal descriptions. - E-mail from Addressing Official for any pre -approved project and/or street names. LOCATION INFORMATION *FOLIO (Property ID) Number(s) of subject property or properties. [Attach list if necessary] 00150080006,00149720005 *LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties. [Attach list if necessary] S13, T48, R25; see attached STREET ADDRESS(ES) where applicable, if already assigned. PROJECT INFORMATION Acceptance of this form does not constitute project and/or street name approval and is subject to further review by the Addressing Official. Pre -Approval may be requested by contacting us at GMD_Add ressing@colliercountyfLgov or 239-252-2482 prior to your submittal. CURRENT PROJECT NAME Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard Commercial Infill Subdistrict PROPOSED PROJECT NAME PROPOSED STREET NAME(s) LATEST APPROVED PROJECT NUMBER [e.g., SDP-94-##, PPL-2002-AR-####, PL2017000####] Addressing Checklist (Rev 10/2022) Page 1 of 1 Operations & Regulatory Management Division • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 • 239-252-2400 www.coll iercountyfl.gov Packet Pg. 366 Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Site Parcel No 00150080006 Address F Site City NAPLES *Disclaimer 9.A.2.f Site Zone *Note 34110 Name / Address LIVINGSTON VETERANS COMMERCIAL 4980 TAMIAMI TR N #201 City NAPLES State I FL I Zip 34103 ap No. Strap No. I Section I Township I Range I Acres *Esti 3A13 000100 035 3A13 1 13 1 48 25 1 2.39 Legal 13 48 25 SW1/4 OF NW1/4 OF NW1/4 OF NE1/4 LESS LIVINGSTON RD DESC I� OR 2597 PG 1692 Milla a Areas 150 Milla a Rates a *Calculations Sub./Condo 100 - ACREAGE HEADER School Other Total Use Code v 99 - ACREAGE NOT ZONED AGRICULTURAL 4.889 6.0293 10.9183 Latest Sales History 2021 Certified Tax Roll (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentialitv) (Subiect to Chanae) Date Book -Page Amount 11/07/20 5857-2468 $ 873,000 12/04/20 5857-2465 $ 0 08/25/05 3876-1546 $ 0 03/08/90 1510-2233 $ 78,500 07/01/88 1365-1684 $ 0 10/01/85 1157-2258 $ 0 08/01/84 1096-619 $ 25,000 Land Value $ 597,500 +) Improved Value $ 0 (_) Market Value $ 597,500 (_) Assessed Value $ 597,500 (_) School Taxable Value $ 597,500 (_) Taxable Value $ 597,500 If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Packet Pg. 367 4*1 811E SMALL I MEDIUM I LARC�ir mO Introduction 40 Search for Parcels by mO Search Results 40 Layers 40 Legend r Print Title: Paper Size: Letter (8.5 X 11) Orientation: Landscape soo I lla Aerial Photography: January - 2022 Urban [61N] - 2022 Rural [2FT] - 2022 Rural [10FT] - 2022 Rural [50FT] .... ... . . . . . Aerial Year: 2022 Sales Year: OFF — I Packet Pg. 368 Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Site Parcel No 00149720005 Address F Site City NAPLES *Disclaimer 9.A.2.f Site Zone *Note 34110 Map No. Strap No. Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3A13 000100 026 3A13 13 48 25 2.16 Legal 13 48 25 NW1/4 OF NW1/4 OF NW1/4 OF NE1/4 LESS LIVINGSTON RD DESC IN OR 2597 PG 1684 Ila a Area o 97 Sub./Condo 100 - ACREAGE HEADER Use Code v 10 - VACANT COMMERCIAL Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book -Page Amount 04/28/20 5758-1612 $ 1,275,000 03/01/11 4656-3169 $ 280,000 02/04/09 4428-1201 $ 100 09/08/06 4102-435 $ 0 08/08/06 4085-1737 $ 2,000,000 08/22/89 1464-388 $ 105,000 08/01/89 1464-387 $ 67,500 03/01/72 443-681 $ 0 Milla a Rates a *Calculations School Other Total 4.889 6.0293 10.9183 2021 Certified Tax Roll (Subiect to Chanae) Land Value $ 940,895 +) Improved Value $ 0 (_) Market Value $ 940,895 (_) Assessed Value $ 940,895 (_) School Taxable Value $ 940,895 (_) Taxable Value $ 940,895 If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Packet Pg. 369 9.A.2.f 4AF 311E SMALL I MEDIUM I L ROE z9za Introduction 40 Search for Parcels by 40 Search Results 40 Layers 40 Legend Op" Print Title: Paper Size: Letter (8.5 X 11) v orientation: Landscape v zoom in xnnm vtn IdertUfy Pan Measure Full County View y;. .1. r •k Aerial Year: t n- 2022 v I _ Sales Year: t OFF v i Aerial Photography: January - 2022 Urban [61N] - 2022 Rural [2FT] - 2022 Rural [10FT] - 2022 Rural [SOFT] Packet Pg. 370 Coder County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliercountyfl.gov (239) 252-2400 Pre -Application Meeting Notes Petition Type: Rezone to a PUD (PUDZ) Date and Time: Wednesday 6 / 15 / 2 2 SF_�ln� �nnrnsa.v Assigned Planner: =�*K - PUDZ Rachel Hansen - Companion GMPA Engineering Manager (for PPL's and FP's): Project Information 9.A.2.f Project Name: Liviingston Rd/Vetran's Memorial Blvd Commercial Infill Subdist PL20220003226 - PUDZ (PUDZ) PL#: PL20220003225 - GMPA 1500$0006 Agricultural & C--1 Property ID #: 149720005 Current Toning: Project Address: City: Naples State: FL Zip:34110 Applicant: Kim Davidson, Peninsula Engineering Agent Name: Christopher Scott, AICP Phone: 239-403-6700 Agent/Firm Address: 2600 Golden Gate PKWYCity: Naples State: PL Zip: 34105 PropertyOwner: Livingston Veterans Commercial LLC#201 -Parcel#149720005 Livingston Veterans Commercial - Parcel#150080006 Please provide the following, if applicable: V. Tota I Acreage: 4 . 5 5 Proposed # of Residential Units: Proposed Commercial Square Footage: 50, 000-Commercial&100, 000 Indoor Self Storage For Amendments, indicate the original petition number: If there is an Ordinance or Resolution associated with this project, please indicate the type and number: vi. If the project is within a Plat, provide the name and AR#/PL#: Updated 1/12/2021 Page 1 1 of 5 Packet Pg. 371 Cod- er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.coiliercountyfl.gov (239) 252-2400 Meeting Notes 0 As of 10/16/2017 all Zoning applications have revised applications, and your associated a U Application is included in your notes; additionally a *new Property Ownership Disclosure c Form is required for all applications. A copy of this new form is included in your pre-app a r Note -- link is https://www.colliercountvfl.gov/Home/ShowDocument?id=75093 c 0 fA t3f C L - 4 to N N M O O O N N n y, J a. ►�r�-� /��.T�sT� ��. � It'Pr Kam. sew :L.. � T c�.� r u� ` r� w' S t_MywiF".a4,N+-Q[eC fa. Coz..'t rG G-ov If Site is within the City of Naples Water Service Area please send to Naples Utilities and Planning Departments. Then, if the petition is submitted, we are to send it (by entail) to the four persons below in their Utilities and Planning Depts. - along with a request that they send us a letter or email of "na objection" to the petition. Bob Middleton RMiddIeton@naoiesgov.com Ailyson Holland AMHolland na les ov.com Robin Singer RSinger(@naplesgov.com Erica Markin emartin na P I e s gov-com Disclaimer: Information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy- Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required data. Updated 1/12/2021 Page 1 2 of 5 r, Co 1- 2 N W v N N N c 0 r M .Q a a W E Q r c a� E t v 2 Q Packet Pg. 372 9.A.2.f ThomasCiarkeVEN From: Sammon5ean Sent: Monday, June 20, 2022 5:05 PM To: ThomasClarkeVEN Subject: FW: PL20220003226 - PUDZ Tom, Please include Ray's email for the Zoning Pre-App notes for the Livingston PUDZ. Thank you Respectfully, Sean Sammon, Principal Planner Zoning Division - Zoning Services Section Sean.Sammon @CoiIierCountvFL.fiov Phone: 239.252.8422; Fax: 239, 252, 6350 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL 34104 Cater Comity Grm%M Management Department Exceeding expectations, every day! Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at hags.//gvo.gl/eXivgT. From: BellowsRay ERay.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Monday, June 20, 2022 4:57 PM To: 5ammonSean Sean.Sammon@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: RE: PL20220003226 - PUDZ Hi Sean, The LAC doesn't provide ❑ conversion ratio for these uses. They should just provide ❑ maximum trip generation cap to regulate the intensity of this project. The trip cap allows for greater flexibility with the mix of commercial uses without the need to provide ❑ conversion ratio. Respectfully, R" Raymond V. Bellows, Zoning Manager Zoning Division - Zoning Services Section Growth Management Department Telephone: 239.252.2463, Fax: 239.252.6350 C :nii'lrer Co,y.rsLy Exceeding expectations, every day! Packet Pg. 373 9.A.2.f Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at https://goo.gl/eXrVgT. From: SammonSean <Sean.5ammon colliercount fl. ova Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2022 4:33 PM To: BellowsRay <Ra .Bellows colliercount fl, ova Subject: PL20220003226 - PUDZ Ray, During the PUDZ/GMPA Livingston Rd/Veteran's Memorial Blvd Pre-App today, the agent mentioned that they're proposing a 50,000 SF non-residential commercial and/or 100,000 SF Self -Storage facility. We mentioned that the total size needs to be committed/specified. What I'm uncertain about is where they determined that they're using a conversion ratio of 2:1 (2 SF of Self -Storage far every 1 SF of the non -Fes commercial). 1 asked Eric if he knows where they came to the ratio but he's uncertain. Do you know if that ratio is in the LDC? Or where they possibly arrived to that? I'm uncertain myself. Respectfully, Sean Sammon, Principal Planner Zoning Division - Zoning Services Section Sea n.Sa m m o n@ Co I l ie rCo u ntyF L.gov Phone: 239.252.8422; Fax: 239.252.6350 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL 34104 Cofilop,ir C;Ounty Growth Management Department Exceeding expectations, every day! Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey of h ttps.yAoc. gIleXivq T. Under Florida Law. e-mail addresses are public records. if you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Packet Pg. 374 9.A.2.f Sean Sammon, Principal Planner Z,G�U I OJ C' or'ej jute 15, 2022 PL20220003226 - PUDZ PL20220003225 - GMPA LIVINGSTON RD/VETERAN'S MEMORIAL BLVD COMMERCIAL INFILL SUBDISTRICT (PUDZ) DESCRIPTION OF WORK A. 5E Corner of intersection of Livingston & Veteran's Memorial Blvd B. Less than 5 AC (t4.55 AC) C. According to FLU: a. The northern parcel (2.16 AC} -> COMM SUB b. The southern parcel {2.39 ACj -> UR c. Landlocked together by the multifamily project D. Bounded by Stock Family— Allura to the east and south/ single family around and afire station to the south E. Restricted to C-1 usage, access off of Veteran's Memorial F. Will expand district and uses such as gas station, indoor self -storage (based on a conversion ratio) a. More frontage along Livingston RD b. 15% preserve, south adjacent to multifamily ZONING A. Access off of Livingston and Veteran's Memorial both egress & ingress B. One interconnection to Allura C. Uses: a. Convenience b. Restaurants c. Fitness d. C-1 uses and add SIC codes ?1'4 Packet Pg. 375 9.A.2.f D. PUD a. Setbacks will be determined with the submittal of the master concept plan b. Proposed size is 50,000 5F AND/OR 100,000 SF, this will need t❑ be specified i. 50,000 SF non-residential ii. 100,000 SF self -storage c. Self -storage Lased on a "2:1" conversion ratio (2 Self -Storage to 1 retail) d. ❑verall size must be committed e. Height & size, no changes, not increasing height requirement or commercial SF from LDC f. Neighboring PU❑ Ordinance 19-22, page 4 states 'Interconnection to adjacent commercial parcel may he relocated in the event the adjacent AG parcel is rezoned to commercial's i. Agent: Altura was designed and thought of to connect both pieces [of land, Altura & this PUDZ] in the future. Altura is already committed and being developed EXTRA PERTAINING INFORMATION A. 10% preserve required (0.45 AC) —off-site B. GIS FLU map has a glitch C. Alcohol sales in the convenience store needs to abide to proximity of schoois, no on -site consumption a. Agent: No liquor stores proposed as use and convenience store will abide by state alcohol sales standards GOING FORWARD A. PUDZ/GMPA will have a combined NIM B. 1 CCPC hearing C. 1 BCC hearing C D a U N c ca L r c 0 N C .' J W N N M O 0 0 N N O N J d 0 ti N PL20220003226 - PUD2 PL20220003225 - GMPA LIVINGSTON RD/VETERAN'S MEMORIAL BLVD COMMERCIAL INFILL SUBDISTRICT (PUD2) Page-2 oft Packet Pg. 376 9.A.2.f ThomasClarkeVEN From: HansenRachel Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2022 9:22 AM To: ThomasClarkeVEN Cc: SammonSean Subject: PL20220003225 - Livingston Road/Veteran's Memorial Boulevard Commercial Infill Subdistrict Fallow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Hi Tom, Below are my pre-app notes for Livingston/Veterans Memorial Commercial Infill GMPA. ■ List and address Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.6 and Policies 7.1-7.4 as applicable. • List and address applicable provisions of Florida Statues 163.3177 for amending the GMP. • Provide a market study demonstrating the demand for the various uses (self -storage, gasoline service station, retail, etc) at the proposed location. The market study should include an inventory of all zoned and/or designated property that could potentially accommodate the proposed uses, as well as an inventory of existing uses, in a 1, 3, and 5 mile radius. • Provide line of sight renderings from pedestrian perspective for proposed design from south and east (where multi -family abuts proposed project). Thank you Rachel Hansen Principal Planner Planning & Zoning Division Rachel. Hansen(cDcolliercountvfl,aov 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1442 Co*er <Z;014M.ty "Tell us how we are doing by faking our Zoning Division Survey at https:/Igoo.aI12XivgT." Information contained in this email is subject to verification by the Zoning Manager and/or Planning Director; if this information is being used as a basis for the purchase/lease of a property or as a guide for the design of a project, it is recommended that a Zoning Verification Letter or Zoning Certificate Application is submitted to zoning services. Applications for a Zoning Verification Letter can be found here: htt s: www.cniliercount fl. ov home showdocument?idrb%24 Zoning Certificate applications can be found here: htt s: www.colliercoun fl. ov our- overnment divisions-f-r o erations- re ulato -mans ement zonin -or- I and- use-app Iication zonin -othe r- I and - use -applications Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. pe, , 1-) Packet Pg. 377 9.A.2.f ThomasClarkeVEN From: Beard Laurie Sent: Monday, June 13, 2022 3:40 PM To: SammonSean Cc: ThomasClarkeVEN Subject: Pre -Application Meeting PL20220003226 - Livingston Road/Veteran's Memorial Boulevard Commercial Infill Subdistrict (PUD2) Attachments; Transportation-PUD monitoring pre app handout 2020.docx Attached are the pre-app notes for PUD Monitoring Laurie Beard Project Manager Please note new address: PUD Monitoring, GMD 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples. FL 34104 Laurie. Beard _CollierCountvFL.aov Phone: (239)-252-5782 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send 6ectronic mail to this entity. Instead. contact this office by telephone or in writing. I Packet Pg. 378 9.A.2.f Transportation Planning and PUD Monitoring Pre-App Notes Developer Commitments: Transportation Planning " The maximum total daily trip generation for the PUD shall not exceed two-way PM peak hour net trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDPISDPA or subdivision plat approval." Use Codes Provide both ITE and SIC use codes in the TIS. PUD Monitoring "One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close- out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this CPUD approval, the Managing Entity is the Insert Company Name Here. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the CPUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed -out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments." Miscellaneous "Pursuant to Section 125.022(5) F.S., issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development." Packet Pg. 379 9.A.2.f ThomasClarkeVEN From: SawyerM ichael Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2022 1:55 PM To: ThomasClarkeVEN; HansenRachel; SammonSean Subject: Livingston Road/Veteran's Memorial Boulevard Commerical Infill Pre App meeting notes c D Thomas, cal c a Please check the TIS required box on the pre app checklist as well as methodology on the next page with a note that methodology will be by email to staff. c Please also add the following notes: c Transportation Planning: Methodology meeting by email required and provide note on TIS cover sheet that fee will be collected at time of GMPA/PUDZ submittal. Address all transportation elements of the GMP. Provide N both ITE and SIC use codes in the TIS. Provide trip limit based on TIS using standard language: "The maximum o total daily trip generation for the PUD shall not exceed two-way PM peak hour net trips based on the use N codes in the IT"E Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision o plat approval. " Al so provide interconnection commitment using standard language. a Veteran's access may not be possible due to intersection improvements scheduled with the expansion of the ti west roadway improvements. Access will be addressed at methodology with additional staff members. Respectfully, Michael Sanger Project Manager Transportation Management Services Department Transportation Planning 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Suite 103 Naples, Florida 34104 239-252-2926 michael.sawyer(cwcoll,� iercountyfl gov Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Packet Pg. 380 9.A.2.f CoVier CDMYIt y COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliercountvfi.gov (239) 252-2400 Meeting Notes FW V11tV.,.1 1A V.L4 A L t!y { {[s .4. v J�¢.� �wt� kL (U61-4-e h L DM Other required documentation for submittal (not listed on application): Disclaimer; information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not folly inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. it is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required data. Updated 1/12/2021 Page 1 3 of 5 Packet Pg. 381 9.A.2.f ThomasClarkeVEN From: BrownCraig Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2022 2:05 PM To: ThomasClarkeVEN Subject: RE: Pre-App Research for Livingston Rd/Vet's Memorial Blvd -Commercial Infil€ Subdistrict - PL20220003226 & Companion GMPA PL20220003225 Attachments: Environmental data Checklist updated December 2016.doc; PUDZ-PUDA checklist FOR REVIEWERS 2-2017.doc Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Thomas, Here are my notes for this one. Please provide Environmental Data: Please provide FLUCFCS aerial map of the subject property please include the Invasive exotic plant percentage amounts and indicate Which FLUCFCS are being considered Native Vegetation. Identify on a current aerial the acreage, location and community types of all upland and wetland habitats on the project site, according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS), and provide a legend for each of the FLUCFCS Codes identified. Aerials and overlay information must be legible at the scale provided. Provide calculations for the acreage of native vegetation required to be retained on -site. In a separate report, demonstrate how the preserve selection criteria pursuant to 3.05.07 have been met. Where applicable, include in this report an aerial showing the project boundaries along with any undeveloped land, preserves, natural fbwways or other natural land features, located on abutting properties. Please provide a current Listed species survey, which should include listed plants for the subject property. Provide supporting exhibits (i.e. Panther zones ect.) be sure to include Black Bear, and Florida Bonneted Bat as part of the evaluation. Provide a wildlife survey for the nests of bald eagle and for listed species known to inhabit biologicsI communities similar to those existing on -site. The survey shall be conducted in accordance with the guidelines or recommendations of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Provide a survey for listed plants identified in 3.04.03. Provide calculations on -site plan showing the appropriate acreage of native vegetation to be retained, the max. amount and ratios permitted to be created ❑n-site or mitigated off -site. Exclude vegetation located within utility and drainage easements from the preserve calculations (LDC 3.05.07.B-D; 3.05.07.F; 3.05.07.H.1.d- e). preservation. (10% preservation.) 4. Please address how the proposed project is consistent with Conservation Coastal Management Element (COME) Policy 6.1 and Objective 7.1. 5. Explain how the {project meets or exceeds the native vegetation requirements and minimizes impacts to listed species as required in the CCME. 6. Indicate how the project design minimizes impacts to listed species. Describe the measures that are proposed as mitigation for impacts to listed species. (if found onsite). 7. indicate wetlands to be impacted and the effects of the impact to their functions and how the project's design compensates for wetland impacts., if applicable. C a v d c 0 a� Z J to N N M O 0 0 N N O N J a 00 ti N 7 Packet Pg. 382 7 9.A.2.f Please Check off $2500 Environmental Data Fee. Craig Brown Principal Environmental Specialist Development Review Division (239) 252-2548. How are we doing? Please CLICK HERE to fill out a Customer Survey. We appreciate your Feedback! From: ThomasClarkeVEN <Thomas.Clarke@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2022 12:05 PM To: AshtonHeidi <Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov5; Beard Laurie <Laurie.9eard@colliercounty€I.gov>; BrownCraig <Craig.Brown@colliercountyfl.gov>; Cook]aime <Jaime.Cook@colliercountyfl.gov>; CrotteauKathyneli <KathyneII.Crotteau@coI!iercountyfl.gov>; PerryDerek <Derek.Perry@ coil iercountyfl.gov>; FauIkner5ue Sue.Faulkner@colliercountyfl.gov7; CastroGabriela <Gabriela.Castro@colliercountyfl.gova; 5antabarbaraGino <Gino.Santabarbara@coiIiercoun fl.gov�; RaineyJenniferA <JenniferA.Rainey@coIIiercountyfl.gov>; MoscaMicheIe EMichele.Mosca@coIIiercountyl �; O " ichard Richard.orth@colliercountyfl.gov>; KlopfParker EParker.Klopf r@colliercountyfl.gov>; hkar5ally <Sally.Ashkar@colliercountyfl.gov>; SawyerMichael Michael.Sawyer@colliercountyfi.gov�; empletonMark <Mark.Templeton,@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: SammonSean <Sean.Sammon@collier untyfl.gov>; HansenRachel Rachel.Hansen@colliercountyfl.gov>; ortmanEric <Eric.ortman@co! Nercountyfl Subject: Pre-App Research for Livingston I Companion GMPA PL20220003225 Good Afternoon All, Please review the attached Zoning Memorial Blvd -Commercial Infill. and Companion GMPA-PL; The virtual meeting for Meeting Memorial Blvd -Commercial Infill Subdistrict -PL20220003226 & p Research for Livingston Rd Vet's DZ) -P 225. is tomorrow, We§,nesday_6/15I22 at 1:30PM- ZOOM ............% . ............ .............................. w................ Topic: Pre --Application Meeting PL20220003226& 322 - Livingston Road/Veteran's Memorial Boulevard Commercial Infill 5ubdistrict(PUD &(GMPA) Time: Jun 151, 2022 01:30 PM Eastern Time (U5 and Canada) Join Zoom Meeting: https://us02web.zoom.us/i/82292541275 -3 Packet Pg. 383 9.A.2.f Environmental PUDZ-PUDA Checklist (non-RFMU) Project Name ] . Is the project is in compliance with the overlays, districts and/or zoning on the subject site and/or the surrounding properties? (CON, ST, PUD, RLSA, RFMU, etc.) (LDC 2.03.05-2,03.08; 4.08.00) Not in CV Library 2. Submit a current aerial photograph (available from the Property Appraiser's office) and clearly delineate the subject site boundary lines. Ifthe site is vegetated, provide FLVCFCS overlay and vegetation inventory identifying upland, wetland and exotic vegetation (Admin. Code Ch. 3 G.1. Application Contents #24). FLVCFCS Overlay -P527 3. Clearly identify the location of all preserves and label each as "Preserve" on all plans. (LDC 3.05.07.H.1). Preserve Label- P546 4. Provide calculations on site plant showing the appropriate acreage of native vegetation to be retained, the max. amount and ratios permitted to be created on -site or mitigated off -site. Exclude vegetation located within utility and drainage easements from the preserve calculations (LDC 3.05.07.13-13; 3.05.07.F; 3.05,07.H.I A-e). Preserve Calculation - P547 5. Created and retained preserve areas shall meet the minimum width requirements per LDC 3.05.07.H.1.b. Preserve Width - P603 C. Retained preservation areas shall be selected based on the criteria defined in LDC 3.05.07.A.3, include all 3 strata, be in the largest contiguous area possible and shall be interconnected within the site and to adjoining off -site preservation areas or wildlife corridors. (LDC 3.05.07.A.1-4) Preserve Selection- P550 7. Principle structures shall be located a minimum of 25' from the boundary of the preserve boundary. No accessory structures and other site alterations, fill placement, grading, plant alteration or removal, or similar activity small be permitted within 10' of the boundary unless it can be shown that it will not affect the integrity of the preserve (i.e. stem wall or berm around wetland preserve). Provide cross -sections for each preserve boundary identifying all site alterations within 25'. (LDC 3.05.07.H.3; 6.01.02.C.) Preserve Setback —New 8. Wildlife survey required for sites where an EIS is not required, when so warranted. {LDC 10.02.02.A.2.f) Listed Species - P522 9. Provide Environmental Data identifying author credentials, consistency determination with the GMPs, off -site preserves, seasonal and historic high water levels, and analysis of water quality. For land previously used for farm fields or golf course, provide soil sampling/groundwater monitoring reports identifying any site contamination. (LDC 3.08.00) Environmental Data Required — P 522 10. PUD Document and Master Plan shall state the minimum acreage required to be preserved. (LDC 10.02.13.A.2) Master Plan Contents-P526 1 I . If the PUD includes a Preserve Tract section UP FOR DISCUSSION — DISCUSS WITH CAD When listing preserve uses, the following is suggested: A. Principal Use: Preserve; 13. Accessory Uses: All other uses (list as applicable or refer to the LDC — see 1-3 below as typical uses listed by agents) {ensure the text states "subject to LDC section related to Allowable uses within County required presen es" Alternate format: A. Uses subject to LDC section Allowable uses within County required preserves: 1. Nature trails that do not reduce the amount of required preserve. 2. Passive Recreation uses, as per LDC requirements. 3. Stormwater only when in accordance with the LDC. �, Packet Pg. 384 9.A.2.f PUD Commitments and. Site Plan notes Where preserves occur adjacent to development off site and will be used in lieu of landscape buffers, include the following condition in the environmental commitments section of the PUD document or master plan: Preserves may be used to satisP, the landscape buffer requirements after exotic vegetation removal in accordance with LDC sections 4.06.02 and 4.06.05.E.I. Supplemental plantings with native plant materials shall be in accordance with LDC section 3.05.07, 12. PUD Document shall identify any listed species found on site and/or describe any unique vegetative features that will be preserved on the site. (LDC 10.02.13.A.2.) Unique Features- P628 Example: A management plan for the entire project shall be submitted in accordance with the requirements and procedures of the LDC for listed species including but not limited to Black Bear, Gopher Tortoise and listed birds. The management plan shall be submitted prior to development of the first phase of the project. 13. Review cross -sections if provided; they are not required with the PUD. However, sometimes they are provided. Is there any fill proposed in the preserve? Additional Comments: A-G _ Packet Pg. 385 9.A.2.f Environmental Data Checklist Project Name The Environmental Data requirements can be found in LDC Section 3.08.00 1. Provide the EIS fee if PUD or CU. 2. WHO AND WHAT COMPANY PREPARED THE ENVIRONMENTAL DATA REPORT' Preparation of Environmental Data. Environmental Data Submittal Requirements shall be prepared by an individual with academic credentials and experience in the area of environmental sciences or natural resource management. Academic credentials and experience shall be a bachelor's or higher degree in one of the biological sciences with at least two years of ecological or biological professional experience in the State of Florida. Please include revision dates on resubmittals. 3. Identify on a current aerial, the location and acreage of all SFWMD jurisdictional wetlands according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS) and include this information on the SDP or final plat construction plans. Wetlands must be verified by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) or Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) prior to SDP or final plat construction plans approval. For sites in the RFMU district, provide an assessment in accordance with 3.05.07 F and identify on the FLUCFCS map the location of all high quality wetlands (wetlands having functionality scores of at least 0.65 WRAP or 0.7 UMAM) and their location within the proposed development plan. Sites with high quality wetlands must have their functionality scores verified by the SFWMD or DEP prior to first development order approval. Where functionality scores have not been verified by either the SFWMD or DEP, scores must i e reviewed and accepted by County staff. consistent with State regulation. 4. SDP or final plat construction plans with impacts to five (5) or more acres of wetlands shall provide an analysis of potential water quality impacts of the project by evaluating water quality loadings expected from the project (post development conditions considering the proposed land uses and stormwater management controls) compared with water quality loadings of the project area as it exists in its pre -development conditions. The analysis shall be performed using methodologies approved by Federal and State water quality agencies, and must demonstrate no increase in nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorous) loadings in the post development scenario. 5. Where treated stormwater is allowed to be directed into preserves, show how the criteria in 3.05.07 H have been met. 6. Where native vegetation is retained on site, provide a topographic map to a half foot and, where possible, provide elevations within each of the FLUCFCS Codes identified on site. For SDP or final plat construction plans, include this information on the site plans. 7. Provide a wildlife survey for the nests of bald eagle and for listed species known to inhabit biological communities similar to those existing on site. The survey shall be conducted in accordance with the guidelines or recommendations of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (JSFWS). Survey times may be reduced or waived where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low, as determined by the FFWCC and USFWS. Where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low, the survey time may be reduced or waived by the County Manager or designee, when the project is not reviewed or technical assistance not provided by the FFWCC and USFWS. Additional survey time may be required if listed species are discovered 8. Provide a survey for listed plants identified in 3.04.03 9. Wildlife habitat management and monitoring plans in accordance with 3.04.00 shall be required where listed species are utilizing the site or where wildlife habitat management and monitoring plans are required by the FFWCC or USFWS. These plans shall describe how the project directs incompatible land uses away from listed species and their habitats. identif}, the location of listed species nests, burrows, dens, foraging areas, and the Packet Pg. 386 9.A.2.f location of any bald eagle nests or nest protection zones on the native vegetation aerial with FLUCFCS overla, for the site. Wildlife habitat management plans shall be included on the SDP or final plat construction plans. Bald eagle management plans are required for sites containing bald eagle nests or nest protection zones, copies of which shall be included on the SDP or final plat construction plans. 10. For sites or portions of sites cleared of native vegetation or in agricultural operation, provide documentation that the parcel(s) were issued a permit to be cleared and are in compliance with the 25 year rezone limitation pursuant to section 10.02.06. For sites permitted to be cleared prior to July 2003, provide documentation that the parcels) are in compliance with the 10 year rezone limitation previously identified in the GMP. Criteria defining native vegetation and determining the legality, process and criteria for clearing are found in 3.05.05, 3.05.07 and v 10.02.06. 11. Identify on a current aerial the acreage, location and community types of all upland and wetland habitats on the a; site, according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Farms Classification System FLUCFCS and provide project � y t )- � m > a legend for each of the FLUCFCS Codes identified. Aerials and overlay information must be legible at the scale c provided. Provide calculations for the acreage of native vegetation required to be retained on -site. Include the a� above referenced calculations and aerials on the SDP or final plat construction plans. In a separate report, _ demonstrate how the preserve selection criteria pursuant to 3.05.07 have been met. Where applicable, include in this report an aerial showing the project boundaries along with any undeveloped land, preserves, natural w flowways or other natural land features. located on abutting properties. M 0 0 12. Include on a separate site plan, the project boundary and the land use designations and overlays for the RLSA, cD CN RFMU, ST and ACSC-ST districts. Include this information on the SDP or final plat construction plans. N J a 13. Where off -site preservation of native vegetation is proposed in lieu of on -site, demonstrate that the criteria in section 3.05.07 have been met and provide a note on the SDP or final plat construction plans indicating the type of donation (monetary payment or land donation) identified to satisfy the requirement. Include on the SDP or N final plat construction plans, a location map(s) and property identification number(s) of the off -site parcei(s) if off -site donation of land is to occur. 14. Provide the results of any Environmental Assessments and/or Audits of the property, along with a narrative of the measures needed to remediate if required by FDEP. 15. Soil and/or ground water sampling shail be required at the time of first development order submittal for sites that occupy farm fields (crop fields, cattle dipping ponds, chemical mixing areas), golf courses, landfill or junkyards or for sites where hazardous products exceeding 250 gallons of liquid or 1,000 pounds of solids were stored or processed or where hazardous wastes in excess of 220 pounds per month or 110 gal Ions at any point in time were generated or stored. The amount of sampling and testing shall be determined by a registered professional with experience in the field of (Environmental Site Assessment and shall at a minimum test for organochlorine pesticides (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (.EPA) 8081) and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) 8 metals using Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) soil sampling Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) FS 3000, in areas suspected of being used for mixing and at discharge point of water management system. Sampling should occur randomly if no points of contamination are obvious. Include a background soil analysis from an undeveloped location hydraulically upgradient of the potentially contaminated site. Soil sampling should occur just below the root zone, about 6 to 12 inches below ground surface or as otherwise agreed upon with the registered professional with experience in the field of Environmental Site Assessment. Include in or with the Environmental Site Assessment, the acceptable State and Federal pollutant levels for the types of contamination found on site and indicate in the Assessment, when the contaminants are over these levels. If this analysis has been done as part of an Environmental Audit then the report shall be submitted, The County shall coordinate with the FDEP where contamination exceeding applicable FDEP standards is identified on site or where an Environmental Audit or Environmental Assessment has been submitted. 16. Shoreline development must provide an analysis demonstrating that the project will remain fully functional for its intended use after a six-inch rise in sea level. Packet Pg. 387 9.A.2.f 17. Provide justification for deviations from environmental LDC provisions pursuant to GMP CCME Policy 6.1., 0 3), if requested. 18. Where applicable, provide evidence of the issuance of all applicable federal and/or state oil and gas permits for proposed oil and gas activities in Collier County. Include all state permits that comply with the requirements of Chapter 52C-25 through 52C-30, F.A.C., as those rules existed on January 13, 2005. 19. Identify any Wellfieid Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones (WRM-ST) within the project area and provide an analysis for how the project design avoids the most intensive land uses within the most sensitive WRM-STs and will comply with the MIRM-ST pursuant to 3.06.00. Include the location of the Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones on the SDP or final plat construction plans. For land use applications such as standard and PUD rezones and CUs, provide a separate site plan or zoning map with the project boundary and Welifield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones identified. 20. Demonstrate that the design of the proposed stormwater management system and analysis of water quality and quantity impacts fully incorporate the requirements of the Watershed Management regulations of 3.07.00. 21. For sites located in the Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern -Special Treatment overlay district (ACSC- ST), show how the project is consistent with the development standards and regulations in 4.02.14. 22. For multi -slip docking facilities with ten slips or more, and for all marina facilities, show how the project is consistent with 5.05.02. Refer to the Manatee Protection Plan for site specific requirements of the Manatee Protection Ptan not included in 5.05.02. 23. For development orders within RFMU sending lands, show how the project is consistent with each of the applicable Objectives and Policies of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the GMP. 24. The County Manager or designee may require additional data or information necessary to evaluate the project's compliance with LDC and GMP requirements. (LDC l 0.02.02.A.3 0 The following to be determined at preapplication meeting: (Choose those that apply) a. Provide overall description of project with respect to environmental and water management issues. b. Explain now project is consistent with each of the applicable objectives and policies in the CCME of the GMP. c. Explain how the project meets or exceeds the native vegetation preservation requirement in the CCME and LDC. d. Indicate wetlands to be impacted and the effects of the impact to their functions and how the project's design compensates for wetland impacts. e. Indicate how the project design minimizes impacts to listed species. Describe the measures that are proposed as mitigation for impacts to listed species. 25. PUD zoning and CU petitions. For PUD rezones and CU petitions_ applicants shall collate and package applicable Environmental Data Submittal Requirements into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) document, prior to public hearings and after all applicable staff reviews are complete. Copies of the EIS shalt be provided to the County :Manager or designee prior to public hearings. 26. Is EAC Review (by CCPC) required? `j Packet Pg. 388 9.A.2.f 27. PUD master plan or PPLISDP site plan notes: Where preserves occur adjacent to development off site and will be used in lieu of landscape buffers, include the following condition in the environmental commitments section of the PUD document. Preserves may be used to satisfy the landscape buffer requirements after exotic vegetation removal in accordance with LDC sections 4.06.02 and 4.06.05.E.1. Supplemental plantings with native plant materials shall be in accordance with LDC section 3.05.07. 28. Additional comments 29. Stipulations for approval (Conditions) Packet Pg. 389 9.A.2.f ThomasClarkeVEN From: TempletonMark Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2022 2:07 PM To: ThomasClarkeVEN Subject: RE: Pre-App Research for Livingston Rd/Vet's Memorial Blvd -Commercial Infill Subdistrict - PL20220003226 & Companion GMPA PL20220003225 Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Hi Thomas, Below are the landscape notes for the PUDZ Label buffers on the master plan per the LDC unless specific buffer requirements are part of the GMPA, LDC required buffers are 15' Type D along the North and West. East buffer is a Type A extending 340' South from Veterans Memorial Blvd. The remaining portion of the East buffer is a Type B. Type B buffer along the South. If the preserve is located where a Type B buffer is required, show a 6' wide reservation along the preserve. Include the following note about the preserve satisfying the buffer requirement: Preserves may be used to satisfy the landscape buffer requirements after exotic vegetation removal in accordance with 4.06.02 and 4.06.05.E.1. Supplemental plantings with native plant materials shall be in accordance with LDC section 3.05.07. In order to meet the requirements of a Type 'B' buffer, a 6-foot-wide landscape buffer reservation is provided outside of the preserve as shown on the Master Plan. In the event that the preserve does not meet the buffer requirements after removal of exotics and supplemental planting within the preserve, plantings will be provided in the 6' wide reservation to meet the buffer requirements. The type, size and number of such plantings, if necessary, will be determined at time of initial SDP or plat and included on the landscape plans for the SDP or plat. Respectfully, Mark Templeton, RLA Principal Planner/Landscape Review C;v 1er COu-nty MW Development Review Division Exceeding Expectations, Every Day! NOTE., Emafi Address has Changed 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples Florida 34104 Phone: 2W.252,2475 How are we doing? Please CLICK HERE to fill out a Customer Survey. We appreciate your Feedback! Disclaimer- this elrnaiI is not to be interpreted as an endorsement or approval of any permit, plan, project, or deviation from the Land Development Code. Packet Pg. 390 Co*ier Count COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliercoun o(239) 252-2400 Pre -Application Meeting Sign -In Sheet PL# 20220003226 & 20220003225 Collier County Contact Information: 9.A.2.f Name Review Discipline Phone Email L! Maggie Acevedo North Collier Fire 252-2309 macevedo@northcollierfire.com I_1 Steve Baluch Transportation Planning 252-2361 stephen.baluch@colliercountyfl.gov Shar A. Beddow MSM/Deputy Fire Marshal - Greater Naples Fire 241-1422 sbeddow@gnfire.org ❑ Ray Bellows Zoning, Planning Manager 252-2463 raymond.bellows@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Laurie Beard PUD Monitoring 252-5782 laurie.beard@colIiercountyfl.gov Y"'Craig Brown Environmental Specialist 252-2548 craig.brown@colliercountyfl.gov Heidi Ashton Cicko Managing Asst. County Attorney 252-8773 heidi.ashton@col lie rcountyfI gov !� Thomas Clarke Zoning Operations Analyst 252-2584 thomas.clarke@colliercountyfl.gov r Jamie Cook Development Review Director 252-6290 Jaime.cook@coiliercountyfl.gov ❑ Gabriela Castro Zoning Principal Planner 252-4211 gabriela.castro@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Maggie DeMe❑ • North Collier Fire 252-230 demeo@northcollierfire.com FI E , - lytilit Planning 252-SSA eric y@cotiercountyfl. ov CI Tim Finn, AICP Zoning Principal Planner 252-4312 timothy.finn@colliercount fl.gov ❑ Sue Faulkner GMP - Comprehensive Planning 252-5715 sue.faulkner@colliercountyfl.gov Michael Gibbons Structural/Residential Plan Review 252-2426 michael.gibbDns@colliercountyfl.gov Storm Gewirtz, P.E. Engineering 5tormwater 252-2434 sto rm.gewi rt z @ c o I I i e rco u n tyfl.g ov Cormac Giblin, AICP Development Review -Planning Manager 252-5095 Cormac.giblin@colliercountyfl.gov J Nancy Gundlach, AICP zoning Principal Planner 252-2484 nancy.gundiach@colliercountyfl.gov Rachel Hansen GMP — Comprehensive Planning 252-1142 Rachel, hansen@colliercountyfl. ov J Richard Henderlong Zoning Principal Planner 252-2464 richard.henderlong@colliercountyfl.gov John Houldsworth Engineering Subdivision 252-5757 john,houldsworth@colliercountyfl.gov L. Alicia Humphries Right -Of -Way Permitting 252-2326 Alicia.humphries@colliercountyfl.gov Anita Jenkins Planning & Zoning Director 252-5095 Anita.'enkins@collie rcount I.gov John Kelly Zoning Senior Planner 252-5719 john.kelly@colliercountyfl. ov I- Parker Klopf GMP—Comprehensive Planning 252-2471 Parker.kiopf@colliercountyfl.gov Troy Komarowski North Collier Fire 252-2521 tkomarowski@northcoliierfire.com Sean Lintz North Collier Fire 597-9227 slintz@northcollierfire.com Diane Lynch Operations Analyst 252-8243 diane.lynch@colliercountyfl.gov �_. Thomas Mastrobert❑ I Greater Na les Fire 252-7348 thomas.mastroberto@colliercountyfl.gov f ! Jack McKenna, P.E. EngineeringServices 252-2911 jack.mckenna@colliercountyfl, ov Updated 1/12/2021 Page 1 4 of 5 Packet Pg. 391 Coder C014Ht y COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colifercountvfl.gov (239) 252-2400 9.A.2.f Matt McLean, R.E. Division Director - IF, CPP & PM 252-8279 matthew.mclean@colliercountyfl.gov f l Michele Mosca, AICP Ca ital Project Planning 252-2466 michele.mosca@colliercount 1. ❑v ❑ Richard Orth Stormwater Planning 252-5092 richard.orth@colliercountyff.gov V Vc Ortman Zoning Principal Planner 252-1032 Eric.Ortman@colliercountyfl.gov L� Derek Perry Assistant County Attorney 252-8066 Derek.perry@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Brandi Pollard Utility Impact fees 252-6237 bra ndi.pollard@colliercountyfLgov Todd Ri gall North Collier Fire 597-9227 triggall@northcollierfire.com ❑ Brett Rosenblum, P.E. Development Review Principal Project Manager 252-2905 Brett.rosenblum@colliercountyfi.gov James Sabo, AICP GMP, Comp Planning Manager 252-2708 james.sabo@colliercountyfl.gov Michael Sawyer Transportation Planning 252-2926 michael.sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov Fi/Corby Schmidt, AICP Comprehensive Planning 252-2944 corby.schmidt@colliercountyfl, ov ❑ Linda Simmons North Collier Fire 252-2311 Linda.Simmons@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Peter Shawinsky Architectural Review 252-8523 etershawinsky@colliercountyfi.gov Mark Templeton Landscape Review 252-2475 mark.templeton@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Connie Thomas Client Services Supervisor 252-6369 Consuela.thornas@colliercounty-fl.gov ❑ Jessica Velasco Client Services 252-2584 jessica.velasco@colliercountyfl,gov J Jon Walsh, P.E. Building Review 252-2962 jonathan.waish@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Kirsten Wilkie Environmental Review Manager 252-5518 kirsten.wilkie@colliercountyfl.gov n Christine Willoughby 1�Daniel Zunzuiune Development Review - Zoning North Collier Fire 252-5748 252-2310 1 christine.willoughby@colliercountyfl.gov Daniel.Zunxunegui@colliercountyfl. ov '>Ur7.- � . ; IIjM : -' --�—.,v.0.-- �"4�1" e Z 25�—vr%'L 7 �rar S.+,KmC4. ('1114A.-rFL- GU[J Additional Attendee Contact Information: Name Representing Phone Email n HN13�Q S/g� 4-✓ ao69.t" fJwu .. Updated 1/12/2021 Page j 5 of 5 Packet Pg. 392 �u.e. n � f► s 1 � � � : 3 Z OpaOiciparir= , f Q Find a participant thomas clarke (Host, met Chris Scott — �r VINSuGA E (" G Corby5chmidt. AICP. Principal Planner Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester. P.A. Norman Trebiicock Andrew Saluan OBLayman Cormac Giblin Craig Brown Daniel Zunzunegui Derek Perry EricOrtman Heidi Cic#co Jwoodward Mark RachelHansen sawyermichael Sean Sammon y 01 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 393 11 9.A.2.f Applicant/Agent may also ss r+d site plans or conceptual plans for review in advance if desired. PL20220003226— Livingston Rd Vet's Mem.Blvd (PUDZ) Planner- Sean Sammon PL20220003225— Livingston Rd Vet's Mem.Blvd CommAnfill Subdist GMPA -Rachel Hansen Assigned Ops Staff: Thomas Clarke 0 STAFF FORM FOR SUPPLEMENTAL PRE -APPLICATION MEETING INFORMATION o- U rn ■ Name and Number of who submitted pre-app request ca L r Kim Davidson, Peninsula Engineering. 239-403-6700 > c 0 ■ Agent to list for PL# y a� c Christopher Scott, AICP, Peninsula Engineering J W ■ Owner of property (all owners for all parcels) M 0 0 0 Livingston Veterans Commercial, LLC (Parcels 150080006 and 149720005) N N 0 N ■ Confirm Purpose of Pre-App: (Rezone, etc.) a Small Scale GMPA and PUDZ ao ti ■ Please list the density request of the project if applicable and number of homes/units/offices/docks (any that N apply): 50,000 sf of commercial and/or 100,000 sf of indoor self -storage. ■ Details about Project: Small Scale GMPA to expand the existing Livingston Road/Veteran's Memorial Boulevard Commercial InfiII Subdistrict to include the adjacent 2.39-acre parcel and revise subdistrict text to expand uses and standards Companion PUDZ application to rezone from C-1 and A to CPU for the 4.55-acres. REQUIRED Supplemental Information provided by: Name: Kim Davidson Title: Project Permit Coordinator Email: kdavidson@pen-eng.com Phone: 239-403-6700 Cancellation/Reschedule Requests: Contact Danny Condom ina-Cllent Services Supervisor danny.condomina@colliercountvfl Phone., 239-252-6866 Created April 5, 2017 Location: K:NCDES Planning Services\Current\Zoning Staff Information Packet Pg. 394 Caeer County 9.A.2.f COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.collierao►►.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the 91 C. aT sucn interest: I Name and Address I % of Ownership If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the iercentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address % of Ownership If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the C1 L.C11Ldg"- L]1 111LCf CSL. Created 9/28/2017 Name and Address I % of Ownership Page 1 of 3 Packet Pg. 395 Co*er County 9.A.2.f COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.collier ov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-5358 d. If the nronprty iC in thip 1" mrniz of n ✓s'PAICP AI nr I IKAITCrl DA DTAICDCLJ In _-.Y_ _ciL_ enera! and/or limited partners: Name and Address % of Ownershio e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the Itticers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners: Name and Address % of Ownership Date of Contract: f. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or ofr' I �1.C1 :), II d carp❑razlon, partnersnip, or trust: Name and Address g. Date subject property acquired Leased: Term of lease years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Created 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 3 C D a. U c ra a� r a� c 0 c J W N N Cl) O O 0 N N O N J a. r— O ti N Packet Pg. 396 11 0 Cv er County 9.A.2.f COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.coili!t .net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Date of option: Date option terminates: or Anticipated closing date: AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form. Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether individually or with a Trustee, Company or ether interest -holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition's final public hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department ATTN. Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Agent/Owner Signature Agent/Owner Name (please print) Created 9/28/2017 Date Page 3 of 3 Packet Pg. 397 Co*r County 9.A.2.f COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.co I l i e rco u nty. gov Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: ❑ PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code ❑ Amendment to PUD- Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLE5, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with an up-to-date application. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. A Model PUD Document is available online at htt www.colliercount fl. ov Home ShowDocument?id=76983. REQUIREMENTS COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Cover Letter with Narrative Statement including a detailed description of why amendment is necessary 1 ❑ Completed Application with required attachments (download latestversion) 1 Pre -application meeting notes `� ❑ Affidavit of Authorization signed and notarized 1 Property Ownership Disclosure Form 1 Notarized and completed Covenant of Unified Control 1 Completed Addressing Checklist 1 Warranty Deed(s) 1 ❑ List Identifying Owner and all parties of corporation a- F Pl +?ly.1414 6e4,.q1 ❑ Signed and sealed Boundary Survey 1 ❑ Architectural Rendering of proposed structures ❑ Current Aerial Photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. 1 ❑ Statement of Utility Provisions 1 ❑ Environmental Data Requirements pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 1 ® ❑ Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) packet at time of public hearings. Coordinate with project planner at time of public hearings. ❑ 0 ❑ Listed or Protected Species survey, less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys. 1 ®. ❑ Traffic Impact Study ❑ Historical Survey 1 ❑ School Impact Analysis Application, if applicable 1 ❑ Electronic copy of all required documents m ❑ Completed Exhibits A-F (see below for additional information)' ❑ © ❑ List of requested deviations from the LDC with justification for each (this document is separate from Exhibit E) ❑ 19 ❑ Checklist continues on next page March 4, 2020 Page 9 of 17 Packet Pg. 398 Coder County 9.A.2.f COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www. co I l i e rco u nty.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAIT: (239) 252-6359 Revised Conceptual Master Site Plan 24" x 36"and One 8 %" x 11" copy ❑ Original PUD document/ordinance, and Master Plan 24" x 36" —Only if Amending the PUD ❑ Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru & underlined 1 Copy of Official Interpretation and/or Zoning Verification 1 7 1 0 *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement 'The following exhibits are to be completed on a separate document and attached to the application packet: Exhibit A: List of Permitted Uses Exhibit B: Development Standards Exhibit C: Master Plan- See Chapter 3 E. 1. of the Administrative Code Exhibit D: Legal Description Exhibit E: List of Requested LDC Deviations and justification for each f Exhibit F: List of Development Commitments If located in RFMU Rural Frin a Mixed Use Receiving Land Areas Pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08.A.2.a.2.(b.)i.c., the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239- 590-3500 for information regarding "Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan." PLANNERS — INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart ❑ Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Johnson Utilities Engineering: Er� Th,+�,Fr =-,¢. ��},,�. z.r Emergency Management: Dan Summers ❑ Parks and Recreation: Barry Williams (Director) Immokalee Water/Sewer District: City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director Other: S ofZr� ifJ.Yl�.e� — �cl- 011-rh City of Naples Utilities Other: — G A'Aptf ( ASSOCIATED FEES FOR APPLICATION re -Application Meeting: $500.00 14"-P PUD Rezone: $10,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre PUD to PUD Rezone: $8,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre PUD Amendment: $5,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $2,250.00 t"Environmental Data Requirements -EIS Packet (submittal determined at pre -application meeting): $2,500.00 Listed or Protected Species Review (when an EIS is not required): $1,000.00 Transportation Review Fees: o Methodology Review: $500.00 *Additional fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting. o Minor Study Review: $750.00 o Major Study Review $1,500.00 March 4, 2020 Page 10 of 11 Packet Pg. 399 Co er Count 9.A.2.f COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov Legal vertising Fees: $1,125.00 ��CPC: BCC: $500.00 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 School Concurrency Fee, if applicable: o Mitigation Fees, if application, to be determined by the School District in coordination with the County Fire Code Plans Review Fees are not listed, but are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. *Additional fee for the 5`' and subsequent re -submittal will be accessed at 20% of the original fee. Signature of Petitioner or Agent Printed named of signing party Date March 4.2020 Page 11 of 11 Packet Pg. 400 9.A.2.f Application for a Public Hearing for PUD Rezone, Amendment to PUD or PUD to PUD Rezone (PUDZ, PUDA, PUDR) PETITION NO: PL20220003226 PROJECT NAME: Livingston Veterans CPUD DATE PROCESSED: Z PUD Rezone (PUDZ): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A.-F., Ch. 3 G.1 of the Administrative Code ❑ Amendment to PUD (PUDA): LDC subsections 10.02.13 E; and 10.03.06.13; and Ch. 3 G.2 of the Administrative ❑ Code PUD to PUD Rezone (PUDR): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A.-F. APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Property Owner(s): Livingston Veterans Commercial, LLC Name of Applicant if different than owner: Address: 4980 Tamiami Trail N, #201 City: Naples State: FL Zip: 34103 Telephone: E-Mail Address andrew@ajsrealtygroup.com Name of Agent: Richard Yovanovich and Chris Scott Cell: Firm: Coleman, Yovanovich, Koester, PA and Peninsula Engineering, Inc. Address: 4001 Tamiami Tr N, Suite 300 City: Naples Telephone: 239-435-3535 Cell: E-Mail Address: rovanovich@cyklawfirm and cscott@pen-eng.com If Property is under contract to be sold: Name of Property Buyer(s): Name of Applicant if different than buyer: Address: Telephone: E-Mail Address: Name of Agent: Firm: Address: Telephone: E-Mail Address: City: City: Cell: Cell: State: FL ZIP: 34103 State: ZIP: State: ZIP: Packet Pg. 401 9.A.2.f REZONE REQUEST This application is requesting a rezone from: C-1 and A Zoning district(s) to the CPUD Present Use of the Property: Vacant zoning district(s). Proposed Use (or range of uses) of the property: Commercial Original PUD Name: N/A Ordinance No.: 2006-23 PROPERTY INFORMATION On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the application: • If the request involves changes to more than one zoning district, the applicant shall include a separate legal description for property involved in each district; • If required to do so at the pre -application meeting, the applicant shall submit four (4) copies of a recent survey (completed within the last six (6) months, maximum 1" to 400' scale), and • The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions arise concerning the legal description, an engineer's certification or sealed survey may be required. Section/Township/Range: 13 48S / 25E Lot: Block: Subdivision: Metes & Bounds Description: Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: 00149720005 and 00150080006 Size of Property: 300+/- ft. x 675+/ ft. = 203,850+ Total Sq. Ft. Acres: 4.68+/- Address/ General Location of Subject Property: Southeast intersection of Livingston Rd and Veterans Memorial Boulevard PUD District (refer to LDC subsection 2.03.06 Q ❑✓ Commercial ❑ Mixed Use ❑ Residential ❑ Other: ❑ Community Facilities ❑ Industrial Packet Pg. 402 9.A.2.f ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE Zoning Land Use N RPUD/ROW Residential/Veterans Memorial Blvd W S RPUD Multi -family Residential E RPUD Multi -family Residential W A/ROW Vacant/Livingston Road If the owner of the subject property owns contiguous property please provide a detailed legal description of the entire contiguous property on a separate sheet attached to the application. Section/Township/Range: Lot: Block: Subdivision: Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: Metes & Bounds Description: ASSOCIATION' Required: List all registered Home Owner / Civic Association(s) that could be affected by this petition and located within 1,000 feet of the subject property. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Civic Associations and Communities page on the Board of County Commissioner's website. Please use the current mailing addresses for each association as registered by the Florida Department of State, Division of Corporations. Name of Homeowner / Civic Association: Mediterra Community Association Mailing Address: 15735 Corso Mediterra Circle City: Naples State: FL ZIP: 34110 Name of Homeowner / Civic Association: Talis Park Community Association Mailing Address: 4500 PGA Boulevard City: Palm Beach Gardens Name of Homeowner / Civic Association: Barrington Cove Neighborhood Association Mailing Address: 10541 Ben C Pratt Six Mile Cypress Pkw City Name of Homeowner / Civic Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner / Civic Association: Mailing Address: City: City: FM State: FL Zip: 33418 d E t r r State: FL ZIP: 33966 Q c aD E State: ZIP: Q State: ZIP: Packet Pg. 403 9.A.2.f EVALUATION CRITERIA Pursuant to LDC subsections 10.02.13 B, 10.02.08 F and Chapter 3 G. of the Administrative Code, staffs analysis and recommendation to the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission's recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners shall be based upon consideration of the applicable criteria. On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a narrative statement describing the rezone request with specific reference to the criteria below. Include any backup materials and documentation in support of the request. a. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. b. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the County Attorney. C. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Growth Management Plan. (This is to include identifying what subdistrict, policy, or other provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that subdistrict, policy, or other provision.) d. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. e. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. f. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. g. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. h. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. Deed Restrictions: The County is legally precluded from enforcing deed restrictions; however, many communities have adopted such restrictions. You may wish to contact the civic or property owners association in the area for which this use is being requested in order to ascertain whether or not the request is affected by existing deed restrictions. Packet Pg. 404 9.A.2.f Previous land use petitions on the subject property: To your knowledge, has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? If so, what was the nature of that hearing? Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? ❑ Yes �✓ No If so, please provide copies. PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS This land use petition requires a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM), pursuant to Chapter 8 B of the Administrative Code and LDC section 10.03.05. Following the NIM, the applicant will submit a written summary and any commitments that have been made at the meeting. Refer to Chapter 8 B of the Administrative Code for the NIM procedural requirements. Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code requires that the applicant must remove their public hearing advertising sign(s) after final action is taken by the Board of County Commissioners. Based on the Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing advertising sign(s) immediately. RECORDING OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS Within 30 days of adoption of the Ordinance, the owner or developer (specify name) at their expense shall record in the Public Records of Collier County a Memorandum of Understanding of Developer Commitments or Notice of Developer Commitments that contains the legal description of the property that is the subject of the land use petition and contains each and every commitment of the owner or developer specified in the Ordinance. The Memorandum or Notice shall be in form acceptable to the County and shall comply with the recording requirements of Chapter 695, FS. A recorded copy of the Memorandum or Notice shall be provided to the Collier County Planned Unit Development Monitoring staff within 15 days of recording of said Memorandum or Notice. LDC subsection 10.02.08 D This application will be considered "open" when the determination of "sufficiency" has been made and the application is assigned a petition processing number. The application will be considered "closed" when the petitioner withdraws the application through written notice or ceases to supply necessary information to continue processing or otherwise actively pursue the rezoning, amendment, or change, for a period of six (6) months. An application deemed "closed" will not receive further processing, and an application "closed" through inactivity shall be deemed withdrawn. An application deemed "closed" may be re -opened by submission of a new application, repayment of all application fees, and the grant of a determination of "sufficiency". Further review of the request will be subject to the then current code. Packet Pg. 405 9.A.2.f Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: ❑✓ PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G.1 of the Administrative Code ❑ Amendment to PUD- Ch. 3 G.2 of the Administrative Code ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G.1 of the Administrative Code The following submittal requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with an up-to-date application. Please upload the submittal items with cover sheets attached to each section via the GMD Portal Incomplete submittals will not be accepted, or processed. View sample PUD document. REQUIREMENTS REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Cover Letter with narrative statement including a detailed description of why amendment is necessary ❑ Completed application with required attachments (download latest version) ✓ Pre -application meeting notes ✓LJ Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized ✓ Property Ownership Disclosure Form ✓ Notarized and completed Covenant of Unified Control ✓ Completed Addressing Checklist ✓ Warranty Deed(s) ✓ List identifying owner and all parties of corporation Signed and sealed Boundary Survey ✓ Architectural rendering of proposed structures 1-1 Current aerial photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. ✓❑ ❑ Statement of utility provisions I ✓ Environmental data requirements pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 ✓ Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) packet at time of public hearings. Coordinate with project planner at time of public hearings. ✓❑ ❑ Listed or protected species survey, less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys. ✓❑ ❑ Traffic Impact Study (TIS) ✓ Historical Survey School Impact Analysis Application, if applicable Electronic copy of all required documents Completed Exhibits A-F (see below for additional information)+ ✓❑ List of requested deviations from the LDC with justification for each (this document is separate from Exhibit E) ✓❑ ❑ *Checklist continues on next page Packet Pg. 406 9.A.2.f Revised Conceptual Master Site Plan 24" x 36"and one (1) 8 %" x 11" copy ✓ LI Original PUD document/ordinance, and Master Plan 24" x 36" — Only if Amending the PUD ❑ ❑ Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru & underlined Copy of Official Interpretation and/or Zoning Verification El +The following exhibits are to be completed on a separate document and attached to the application packet: • Exhibit A: List of Permitted Uses • Exhibit B: Development Standards • Exhibit C: Master Plan- See Chapter 3 G.1 of the Administrative Code • Exhibit D: Legal Description • Exhibit E: List of Requested LDC Deviations and justification for each • Exhibit F: List of Development Commitments If located in RFMU (Rural Fringe Mixed Use) Receiving Land Areas Pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08.A.2.a.2.(b.)i.c., the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239-690-3500 for information regarding "Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan." PLANNERS — INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: ❑ School District (Residential Components) ❑ Conservancy of SWFL Utilities Engineering Parks and Recreation Director Emergency Management Immokalee Water/Sewer District City of Naples Planning Director Other: Fj City of Naples Utilities Other: FEE REQUIREMENTS ❑✓ Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 ❑✓ PUD Rezone: $10,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone: $8,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre ❑ PUD Amendment: $6,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre Comprehensive Planning ❑✓ Consistency Review: $2,250.00 ❑� Environmental Data Requirements -EIS Packet (submittal determined at pre -application meeting): $2,500.00 ❑� Listed or Protected Species Review (when an EIS is not required): $1,000.00 0 Transportation Review Fees: • Methodology Review: $500.00 (Methodology by Email to Staff) *Additional fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting. • Minor Study Review: $750.00 • Major Study Review $1,500.00 ❑✓ Fire Planning Review Fee: ($150 PUDZ) ($125 PUDA, PUDR) Packet Pg. 407 9.A.2.f ❑✓ Estimated Legal Advertising fee: • CCPC: $1,125.00 • BCC: $500.00 �✓ If applicable, an additional fee for Property Owner Notifications will be billed to the applicant after Hearing Examiner hearing date. (Variable) ❑ School Concurrency Fee, if applicable: • Mitigation Fees, if application, to be determined by the School District in coordination with the County All fees are collected at the time of application. Property Notification Letters, if required by The Land Development Code, will be invoiced after the petition is heard by the Board of County Commissioners. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. *Additional fee for the 5th and subsequent re -submittal will be accessed at 20% of the original fee. *The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to Growth Management Community Development Department I GMD Portal: https://cvportal.colliercountyfl.gov/cityviewweb Questions? Email: GMDclientservices@colliercountyfl.gov 12/20/2022 Signature of Petitioner or Agent Date Christopher O. Scott, AICP Printed named of signing party Packet Pg. 408 9.A.2.f AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PL20220003225 and PL20220003226 1 Andrew J Saluan (print name), as Authorized Agent/Manager (title, if applicable) of - ivingslon Veterans Commercial, LLc (company, If a llcable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) ownerQapplicant Qcontract purchaser and that. 1. 1 have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application, and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. Well authorize Co eman, Yovanovich Koester. PA and Peninsula Enginerring, Inc to act as ourlmy representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. *Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. Ares. or v pres • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner" of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee". • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts stated in it are true. nature Dat STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing in trument w s acknowleged before me by means of physical presence or ❑online notarization this /day of 20;L2,#y (printed name of owner or qualifier) Andrew J. Saluan Such person(s) Notary Public must check applicable box 0 Are personally known to me ❑ Has produced a current drivers license ❑ Has produced as identificatlo Notary Signature= CKWCOA-00115055 REV 3/4/2020 _,I?`•CAROL L. BRUNDAGE IPSION 0 HH 1695M ?• Qom: IRES. August 2, 2025 Bonded Tin IVpTIfy Pubk UndelY bw Packet Pg. 409 9.A.2.f Cother County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 'ROPFRTY 01niniERCNia DISCLOc-1 iRF FnRnn This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: C Name and Address I % of Ownership If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address I % of Ownership If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest: Name and Address I % of Ownership Created 9/28/2017 Page 1 of 3 Packet Pg. 410 Cother County 9.A.2.f COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners: e f [- Name and Address % of Ownership Livingston Veterans Commercial, LLC 100.00 - Eijk De Mol Van Otterloo Revocable Trust* 92.5% - AJS Livingston Veterans Commercial, LLC** 7.5% 'Eijk De Mol Van Otterloo is sole beneficiary; *'Andrew Saluan is sole shareholder If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the 'I I IL.CI J, a L U L.RI IUIUCI J, UCI ICI luicil ICJ, UI f CII LI ICI J. Name and Address % of Ownership Date of Contract: If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust: Name and Address 4/28/2020 and 11/7/2020 Date subject property acquired ❑ Leased: Term of lease years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Created 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 3 Packet Pg. 411 Cother County 9.A.2.f COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Date of option: Date option terminates: , or Anticipated closing date: AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form. Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest -holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition's final public hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Agent/Owner Signature Christopher O. Scott Agent/Owner Name (please print) Created 9/28/2017 5/22/2023 Date Page 3 of 3 Packet Pg. 412 9.A.2.f CO ler 0014.lrilty Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1036 1 Email: GMDClientServices@colliercountyfl.gov www.colliercountyfl.gov COVENANT OF CONTROL The undersigned do hereby swear or affirm that we are the fee simple titleholders and owners of record of property commonly known as parcel ID 149720005 and 150080005 Naples, FL (Street address and City, State and Zip Code) and legally described in Exhibit attached hereto. The property described herein is the subject of an aoolication for Commercial planned unit development Peninsula Engineering, Inc. an ( C PLID) zoning. We hereby designate Cslnrrmn Vmm�n irh Knoalor nn , legal representative thereof, as the legal representatives of the property and as such, these individuals are authorized to legally bind all owners of the property in the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop. This authority includes, but is not limited to, the hiring and authorization of agents to assist in the preparation of applications, plans, surveys, and studies necessary to obtain zoning approval on the site. These representatives will remain the only entity to authorize development activity on the property until such time as a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to Collier County. The undersigned recognize the following and will be guided accordingly in the pursuit of development of the project: 1. The property will be developed and used in conformity with the approved master plan including all conditions placed on the development and all commitments agreed to by the applicant in connection with the planned unit development rezoning. 2. The legal representative identified herein is responsible for compliance with all terms, conditions, safeguards, and stipulations made at the time of approval of the master plan, even if the property is subsequently sold in whole or in part, unless and until a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to and recorded by Collier County. 3. A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a failure to comply with any requirements, conditions, or safeguards provided for in the planned unit development process will constitute a violation of the Land Development Code, 4. All terms and conditions of the planned unit development approval will be incorporated into covenants and restrictions which run with the land so as to provide notice to subsequent owners that all development activity within the planned unit development must be consistent with those terms and conditions. 5. So long as this covenant is in force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the terms, safeguards, and conditions of the planned unit development, seek equitable relief as necessary to compel compliance. The County will not issue permits, certificates, or licenses to occupy or use any part of the planned unit development and the County maystop ongoing construction activity until the project is brought into compliance with all terms, conditions and safeguards of the planned unit development. Signature of- caner Signature of Owner Andrew J Satuan as authorized Agenl Lrvinost, n Velerans Commercial. LLC Printed Name of Owner Printed Name of Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by means of physical presence or online registration this f 3ay of 2091, by Andrew J. Saluan who is 2-personally known to me or ❑ has produced as identification. CAROL L BRUNDAGE COMMISSION 0 HH 0534 IVC16VgS:A Uht2 i rl�ature f Notary ublj[ of �t°eA Banded Thru Namry PAft wwwfta Print Name of Notary Public 07/2022 Page 8 of 11 Packet Pg. 413 INSTR 5862074 OR 5758 PG 1612 E-RECORDED 5/1/2020 4:38 PM PAGES 2 CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT AND COMPTROLLER, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA DOC@.70 $8,925.00 REC $18.50 CONS $1,275,000.00 This Document Prepared Without Opion of Title JAMES H. SIESKY, ESQUIRE Siesky & Pilon 2800 Davis Blvd., Suite 205 Naples, FL 34104 Consideration: $1,275,000.00 Parcel IDNumber: 0 014'9729 0 0 5 arranty x . This Indenture, Made thiss Livingston/Veterans, LLC,,. of the County of Collier Livingston Veterans Co " i company whose address is: 4980 Tamiami Tra day of May , 2020 A.D. , L Florida limited liability company of the County of Collier Witnesseth that the GRANTOR, for and in consideration Of ------------------------TEN DOLI and other good and valuable consideration to GRANTOR granted, bargained and sold to the said GRANTEE and GRA lying and being in the County of Collier Between , State of Florida , grantor, and LLC, a Florida limited liability #201, Naples, FL 34103 State of Florida , grantee. 10)— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — DOLLARS, �d by GRANTEE, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has rs successors and assigns forever, the following described land, situate, State of Florida to wit: The Northwest 1/4 of the Northw t, 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 13, Town ip 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, less and ex'''Itt.,the parcel of land deeded to Collier County, a political subdivision°, 6J- deed recorded in Official Records Book 2597, Page 1684, of t~he°°ublic Records of Collier County, Florida. Together with all tenements, hereditaments a d Appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. y To Have and to Hold, the same in fee simple f AND, the grantor hereby covenants with said grant:e�e '`t�t the grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that to grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey_,._ id land, and hereby fully warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever; and that said land is free of all encumbrances, except taxes accruing subsequent to December. 31, 2019 and subject to (a) ad valorem and non-advalorem real property taxes for the year of closing and subsequent years; (b) zoning, building code and other use restrictions imposed by governmental authority; and (c) outstanding oil, gas and mineral interest of records, if any. Subject property is vacant, unimproved property and has never assumed the character of homestead. and the grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said land, and will defend the same against lawful claims of all p Packet P 414 Laser Generated by 0 Display Systems, Inc., 2020 (863) 763-5555 Form FLWD-2 g *** OR 5758 PG 1613 *** 9.A.2.f Warranty Deed -Page 2 Parcel ID Number: 001497200005 In Witness Whereof, Signed, sealed and Printed Name: Witness Printed Witness has hereunto set its hand and seal the day and year first above written. m our presence: 4 STATE OF Florida`,` COUNTY OF Collier' The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me 1 notarization, this ! day of April Marilyn Be nier, Manager of Li liability company ho is personally known to me r who has produced her as identification. Livingston/Veterans, LLC, a Florida limited liability company By: `�� ;. ' ,- (Seal) Marilyn/Bernier, Manager P.O. Address: 477 Devil's Lane, Naples, FL 34103 physical presence or online by op/Veterans, LLC, a Florida limited My �. commission N 1 7509@05 Laser Generated by® Display Systems, Inc., 2020 (863)763-5555 Fom1FLWD-2 Packet Pg. 415 INSTR 5967074 OR 5857 PG 2468 E-RECORDED 12/9/2020 4:25 PM PAGES 4 CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT AND COMPTROLLER, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA DOC@.70 $6,111.00 REC $35.50 INDX $2.00 CONS $873,000.00 THIS INSTRUMENT PREPARED BY AND RE'FURN TO: Santiago El.jaiek III, Esq. Marin, Eljaiek & Lopez, P.L. 2601 SOLlth Bayshore Drive. 18"' Floor - Coconut Grove, Florida,33133 Orn' File No.: 0054-008 Property Appraisers cre"Ientification (Folio) NuIII her: 00 15 00 80000 166D- - _ W "A R R A IN T Y ff U_`E r1__ li D THIS WARRANTY DEED, nizcl€ rhe,k clay of �)e r4 oe_r .2020 by Leonard Stemmerman, Sean Stemmerrnan, and Debra Huss allda Debbie Hussie, Intl ivicfu rlh" and as Successor Co -Trustees of the Marc L. Catalano Revocable Interli vos Tfust dated November 23, 2004', as amended and restated on October 26, 2010. whose post office address is 634( lynnOuth I.N. Davie- FL 33331, herein called the Grantor. to Livingston Veterans Commercial LLC, a Florida Iii nteil li bilitl company, \%hose post ot1 ice address is =4980 Tamiami 'Tr. N . 8201. Naples, FL 34103, 17ezeinaiter cal[ed the�;Gl ntee: (ffherever used herein the terms "Grawor" ilzchule all Ilia harlrts to Ihts instrument (md the hairs, legal representalives and assigns «f�izrclividuuls;�art�e a� rcCeSsol's CHO assigns ofcor72oratlons) W I T N E S S E T H: That the Grantor, for and in c isid �'at h of the sum of TI: N AND 00/100'S (S 10.00) Dollars and other valuable considerations. receipt whereof rs` c��j ttl�no�4lcd4�cd- hereby -rants, bargains. sells. aliens, remises, releases. conveys and confirms unto the Granice,, rl that,certain land situate in COLLIER County. Slate Of' Florida. to -wit.. - The Southwest 1/4 (SW 1/4) of the Northwest 1/4 (N:1",A[41 of the Northwest 1/4 (N`L'V 1/4) of the Northeast 1/4 (NE 1/4) of Section 13, Township 48 Sonth, dhn .,, i .East, Collier County, Florida; LESS therefrom the land conveyed to Collier County by W rrt i" Oced recorded in Boole 2597, I'.r ;c 1692, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Subject to easements, restrictions and reservations of record and Wx6, ftl`thc_year 2021 and thereafter. TOGETHER, with all the tenements. her editamcnts andappurtenamcs thereto b16i5 > ", or�in anywise appertaining. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the same in fee simple foi-ever. The undersigned hereby represent and warrant that the herein -described Property is 'Vicant land and not their homestead, nor the homestead of anyone for whose support they are responsible, nor adjacent to or contiguous With ariv such homestead. AND, the Grantor hereby covenants with said Grantee that the Grantor is 1a%vftrlly seized of said land in lee simple: that the Grantor has good right and lawftrl authority to sel I and convey said land. and hereby warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the laN\Tul claims ol° all persons whomsoever; and that said land is free of all encumbrances, except taxes accruing subsequent to December 3 1- 2020. File No. 0054-008 Packet Pg. 416 OR 5857 PG 2469 IN' WITNESS WHEREOF, the szfld Grantor hl" "il-mcd and sealed the -se presents the day and \ear first above mitten. Si-ned. scaled and dehN� e d in the presence 01'.. Witness #I Si nature willic-is 41 III-imcd N;lme C- , A Witness f2 SiQnatUl'e Witness #2 Printed Name Mart L. Catalano Revocable Inter Vivos Trust dated 11/23/2004 ws amended and restated on 0clober 26, , 2 0 1 (01 LQ011,11'd Stein HICI-InalL I ndiVidUalk, and ms Soccessor Co- Tru*Icc ol'thc Marc L Catalano Revocable Intel- Vivos I'l,w'I thiled I i "l-V2004 as amended and restated on 0cwher 26- 20 10 STATE OF COUNTY OF �-rR4�- The forelzoim-, instrument �%Zls acknoWedged heime IncI)\ means ol�"V - presence or El online nolarization. this t¢ (hay of 2020. h% I -Collard and as SUCCC.SS01' CO- I'RlSteL! ofthe Marc L. Catalano Rcvocal)le Intel- Vivos'Frusi darted Nlovewi)(nr.J-,% 21 4; as amended and restated on October WIT26 10 10. vdin is persomflk kmm 11 to 111C or has as idemil-ication "Ind El did j id not take ijoalkilij, %\ RANCQo + m (J CD 1: \0talA PLINIC -n ) -13 Z/13 OG op, Ilrinled Notar, Nzimo My Col 11 in !e No 0054-008 I Packet Pg. 417 OR 5857 PG 2470 9.A.2.f IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Grantor has si+ ned and sealed these presents the day and year First above written. Si�ancd. sealed and delivered in the presence of: Mare L. Catalano Revocable Inter Vivos Trust Witness # 1 Si(,nature _. dated 11/23/2004 as amended and restated on October A x � 26, 2010 Witness 41 Printed Name Witnr#2 SiMnature � t T Sean Stemmer man Individually- and as Successor CO -?F `e Trustee ofthe Marc L. Catalano Revocable Inter Vivos Witness 2 Printed Name 'Trust dated I ]/2312004 as amended and restated on '1'0ctober 26, 2010 STATE OF COUNTY OF The foregoing 'HISII'LlmuAt was acknokvled-ed before me by mc<t10 this day of ' } 2020, by Sean Stemmer the Marc L. Catalano Revocable rater Vivos Trust dated N vem 26. 2010. w 7 is personally known to me or has produced ith. �r a otary Name cal Presence or ❑ online notarization, uall)arld ors SuCUSSor Co -Trustee of as amended and cslated on October o as idemification and ❑ did File No: 0054-008 Packet Pg. 418 *** OR 5857 PG 2471 *** 9.A.2.f IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Grantor has signed and sealed these presents the clay and year first above Written. Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of-: ignature jt i t,j, t? , r'l L) `-,>3 i V Witness #I P- ited Nan k Witness 42 Signature Witness 42 Printed Name Marc L. Catalano Revocable Inter Vivos Trust dated 11/23/2004 as amended and restated on October 2G, 20� a Debra I I UXey a/kla Debbie I-lussie, Individually and as Successor Co-Trrlstee of the Marc L. Catalano Revocable Inter Vivos Trust dated I I1-312004 as amended and restated on October 26, 2010 STATE OF COUNTY OF ° The foregoimz instrumcnt was acknowledged before me by meansbl" this CA- day of ' =#' w'?02(1. by Debra HlLlssey a/k Df Co -Trustee oi'the 1Vlarc 1.. Catalano Revocable Inter Vivos Trust dated , on October 26. 2010. who is personally known to me or has produced'_ and 0 did K did not take an oath. �A 0 LUISA A. CARRION SE S Notary Public. State of Florida Commission# GG 355564 Plycomm. expires July 16.2023 Notary I)Liblic My coalmission expires: Printed Notary Name cal presence or Q online notarization. l Iussie, Individually and as Successor ber 23. 20041 as amended and restated ! DL_ as identification File No: 0054.008 Packet Pg. 419 9.A.2.f 0 J M Q 1^Qr/ 1� O 0 N LL 1 �I L O (n � v - J LLJ Q � LLJ J00 w cn z _J v� Z U O a_ W� Z¢ �� V) z m _ o LO J O cD O 0 m. JN z 00 00 Z r Z w � p s Ld Ld w p CO �� a6 a �m E. LINE N.W.1/4, N.W.1/4, N.W.1/4, N.E.1/4, SEC.13-48-25 w ti }J� S 00'08'49" E 336.61' (R) w � S 00'06'38" ��ti E ° 336.48' (M) o\ryo 6 Z J , y' J 9 O 00 w 3 d w 50 , = Ld O �0 6 Ld 0 ��O O, 0O spa 44K ,9 �,• 1�. ,`\. �\ �` °� 0,\cy0,�<'J' ° 6 O,OboO O, N M ,6ory Ln Ln N N I-1 Ld OL ,1 0 L0 00 O N OTT O ,. VI 0000 0 IHy�a�y0a�6 0 w h`!' O O O 01'1'lY O cj�C) 00 o U L0 N U a- L.L :E m L1 0 '_1O' 1 O L / LO ��J m N 00'09'24',',q1 W 200.02' (R) LO LESS �. AND EXCEPTo,,�' O.R. 2597, PG. 16f ®O T "Po OVERHEAD POWERLINES yao CONCRET : WAI K.^ _ '09'24" W 3,3633' (RY t U � 0 1a� 0 0 Z Co Ii Ln Ln �Ln \N � � I UW vi z I w z z �o o� U U w Symbol Description z (C) CALCULATED (M) MEASURED (R) RECORD MFIP O FOUND 5/8" IRON PIN MFND A FOUND NAIL/DISK MSIP • SET 5/8" IRON PIN/CAP "LB1772" © CABLE PULL —BOX 0 COMMUNICATIONS MARKER/FLAGGING ® COMMUNICATIONS PULL —BOX GUY ANCHOR ® TRAFFIC MAST —ARM BASE e0 ELECTRIC METER ❑L PARKING LOT LIGHTING PULL —BOX ❑O TRAFFIC LIGHT PULL —BOX ® PEDESTRIAN CROSSING POLE POLE XCONCRETE CONCRETE POLE WITH LIGHT Id WOOD POLE 0 ELECTRIC SERVICE 0 TRAFFIC LIGHT SERVICE PEDESTAL GAS MAIN MARKER/FLAGGING WATER VALVE EOP EDGE OF PAVEMENT BOC BACK OF CURB LETTER I REVISIONS O yo O a In O, N I 00 � 66 U Ld o0 (n 01 \ O — 4 4 O O z 011 Z 6a M�y� ° � /0� U) Y J V OHO ?� 00 00 Z W W V) (n Ld J S O b ti O o Z J m < O,\0ti Ln a E. LINE S.W.1/4, N W.1/4, N.W.1/4, N.E.1/4, SEC.13-48-25 S 00'0849 E 336.61 (C) oti �y S 00'07'59" E 336.84' (M) p O1y. 1 O 110 01 01ryO C1 0 , Obi 0 ,�0 ry O 1,151 N U ro 00'09'24" W 106.70' (R) :E OVER HEAD LINE 0 `6` e c;\ LESS AND EXCEPT 0 0 �, ,h� ,ti O.R. 1 ,b10 ED eo'aq a , CONCRETE CEnc-- LIVINGSTON RD (PUBLIC R-O-W, WIDTH VARIES) PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: a 1,9 O S 04'35'49" W 337.87' (R) O,,"S 04'37'12" W 338.42' M S 04'35'49" W 338.40' �C� PG. 1692 THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPT THE PARCEL OF LAND DEEDED TO COLLIER COUNTY, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION, BY DEED RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2597, PAGE 1684, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. TOGETHER WITH THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPT THE PARCEL OF LAND DEEDED TO COLLIER COUNTY, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION, BY DEED RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2597, PAGE 1692, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARTY CHIEF: DATE: JW 11 14 2022 NOT VALID WITHOUT DRAWN BY: DATE: THE SIGNATURE AND BEN — KAS 1 1 28 2022 THE ORIGINAL SHEET OF SHEET SEAL OF A FLORIDA 1 1 LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. SEC—TWN—RGE DATE REV BY 13-48-25 z 14&1 HOLE MONTES� ENGINEERS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS 950 Encore Way Naples, FL. 34110 Phone: (239) 254-2000 Florida Certificate of Authorization No. 1772 LINE BEARING DISTANCE L1 N 89'07'05" E 22.00' L2 N 44'28'50" E 42.70' L3 S 89'05'51 " W 28.00' L4 N 89'07'05" E 80.01' L5 I N 89'05'06" E 80.03' L6 I N 44'31'48" E 42.42' LO N 1 00 00 � o` ^^ 6 Ld y ao0 ,5 01ry O`'ti0'`,ti O,ry O,� O,,L ryo0 `i NOab\b. e' CONCRETE WALK 00 O \ ai T N Lq P0 V) z Z � M YI^^ \ O /O 00 Z 00 WV V / / \ OOJ� c�' 01ti O,ti O�ti W Z J U ,1a� O U 00 J J 0 I. L (no r GRAPHIC SCALE 50 0 2s 50 1 "=50' 6�' 00 O LO � C,R c° S 00' 10'07" E 673.56' (M) S 00.09'24" E 673.58' (C) O O ��0O, �O .�a. 'a: NOTES: THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RESERVATIONS OR RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. PROPERTY AREA: 4.6 ACRES, MORE OR LESS BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON REFER TO NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF NORTHWEST QUARTER OF NORTHWEST QUARTER OF NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AS BEING N 89'07'05" E. ABSTRACT OF TITLE HAS NOT BEEN REVIEWED BY SURVEYOR. ELEVATIONS REFER TO THE NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988. THIS PROPERTY WAS SURVEYED UNDER MY DIRECTION ON 11/14/2022. THIS SURVEY IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND ORIGINAL SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. CERTIFIED TO: • PENINSULA ENGINEERING CERTIF CATEHOLEEOF (AUTHORIZATION NUMBER LB 1772 e •Nu02 -- BY JOHN J. HILTON LIVINGSTON & VETERAN'S • 6278 o STATE OF m FLORIDA •'�Qc STATE8OF FLORIDA BOUNDARY SURVEY DRAWING NO. H-21 63 PROJECT NO. 2022731 REFERENCE NO. 2022731 Bound.dwg Packet Pg. 420 9.A.2.f d V = Livingston Veterans CPUD Boundary (4.68-acres) f i J AWL 06 1 Veterans Memorial Blvd �. x. F. • I � Ala t .I - ti .E p R F � = R• �A ky SOURCES: COLLIER OUNTY GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATICIN SYSTEMS PROJECT: CLIENT: LIVINGSTON VETERANS CPUD LIVINGSTON VETERANS COMMERCIAL, LLC PENINSULA�� F-:N1GjhIFFPIN1G LOCATION: SE INTERSECTION OF LIVINGSTON RD 2600 GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY AND VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34105 l z a . 7j ins Memorial Blvd_ �6 ti ^ lirt.l� 0 m m c O N 1� .O to n N M 0 0 N N r ^ N co co Er - 0 1,000 2,000 Fe P�- EXHIBIT DESC: AERIAL LOCATION MAP NOTES: Packet Pg. 421 C O T 9.A.2.f PENINSULA~� ENGINEERING LIVINGSTON VETERANS COMMERCIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PROJECT NARRATIVE & EVALUATION CRITERIA PROJECT OVERVIEW: The application proposes establish the Livingston Veterans Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) on 4.68-acres located at the southeast intersection of Livingston Road and Veterans Memorial Boulevard, in Section 13, Township 48 South, Range 25 East. The application seeks to rezone the property from C-1 and Rural Agricultural zoning district to CPUD. The CPUD is intended to provide a variety of commercial uses to serve the surrounding residential and institutional uses. The property has a companion GMPA application to expand the existing Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Commercial Infill Subdistrict (PL20220003225). PROJECT BACKGROUND: The existing property consists of two separate parcels under common ownership. The northernmost parcel (Parcel ID 149720005) is approximately 2.2-acres and is identified as the Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard Commercial Infill Subdistrict on the Collier County Future Land Use Map (Ord. 2004- 71). The Subdistrict limits commercial intensity to a maximum of 50,000 sf of the office, medical and financial institutions permitted in the Commercial Professional and General Office (C-1) zoning district. This parcel was rezoned to C-1 zoning in 2006 (Ord. 2006-23). The southern parcel (Parcel ID 150080006) is approximately 2.4-acres and is located within the Urban Mixed Use District/Urban Residential Subdistrict Future Land Use designation and has a Rural Agricultural (A) zoning designation. Both parcels are currently vacant. The subject property is immediately adjacent to the Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard East Residential Subdistrict and Allura RPUD to the east and south. Allura is approved for 304 multifamily dwellings located in a total of five (5) three-story buildings with separate clubhouse and amenity center. Livingston Veterans CPUD, PL20220003226 Page 1 1 Updated: October 12, 2023 2600 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, Florida, 34105 Office 239.403.6700 Fax 239.261.1797 Fla Engineer CA 28275 Fla Landscape CA LC26000632 Fla Surveyor/Mapper LB8479 Packet Pg. 422 9.A.2.f PENINSUAAi,i ENGINEERING To the north of Veterans Memorial Boulevard is the Mediterra PUD and single-family dwellings. The Mediterra PUD extends to the west side of Livingston Road and the property that is catacorner (NW Intersection) to the subject property is part of the community's golf course. The vacant property on the west side of Livingston Road, opposite the subject property is currently designated Urban Residential Subdistrict on the FLUM and is zoned Rural Agricultural. Future Land Use Zoning Existing Land Use North Urban Residential RPUD Single -Family Residential East Liv Rd/Vet Mem Blvd E Res Subdistrict RPUD Multi -Family Residential South Liv Rd/Vet Mem Blvd E Res Subdistrict RPUD Multi -Family Residential West Urban Residential Agricultural Vacant The immediate area has experienced growth and development since the Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard Commercial Infill Subdistrict was initially approved in 2006. There has been a significant increase in the number of residential rooftops with the approval and development of Sandalwood, Allura, Barrington Cove, and Ardena, among others. New public and institutional facilities include the North Collier Fire Station #48, Veterans Memorial Elementary School and the new Aubrey Rogers High School, which is located on Veterans Memorial Livingston Veterans CPUD, PL20220003226 Page 1 2 Updated: October 12, 2023 2600 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, Florida, 34105 Office 239.403.6700 Fax 239.261.1797 Fla Engineer CA 28275 Fla Landscape CA LC26000632 Fla Surveyor/Mapper LB8479 Packet Pg. 423 9.A.2.f Boulevard, approximately one mile west of Livingston Road. The new high school is scheduled to open in Fall of 2023 and will accommodate over 2,000 students. To accommodate the new high school, the County recently completed 1.25-mile four -lane section of Veterans Memorial Boulevard to connect the school to Livingston Road. Veterans Memorial Boulevard will eventually extend to Old 41 and US 41, as it is included as a cost feasible project in Collier County's 2040 Long -Range Transportation Plan. PENINSUAAi,i ENGINEERING COLLIER COUNTY LRTP 2040 NAPLESINSET This intersection of an arterial and major collector roadway is an appropriate location for convenient commercial establishments to provide small-scale shopping and personal needs within a convenient travel distance to the surrounding residential and institutional land uses. The closest commercial uses and zoning districts to the subject site are located approximately 2-miles to the south at Immokalee Road and 2-miles to the north at Bonita Beach Road in Lee County. DETAILS OF REQUEST: The application seeks to rezone the 4.68-acre property from C-1 and Rural Agricultural zoning to Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD). The CPUD proposes to limit the commercial uses to those in the C-1 zoning district and select convenience retail and service uses to serve the surrounding residential and institutional land uses. Proposed commercial uses include professional and medical office, banks, gasoline service stations and carwashes, retail, restaurants, fitness and indoor self -storage. The CPUD proposes a maximum commercial intensity of 50,000 square feet of commercial floor area and 100,000 square feet of indoor self -storage use, subject to a trip cap. The CPUD includes development standards for commercial uses in Exhibit B, including a maximum proposed height of 3-stories, not to exceed 35' zoned height/45' actual height. The CPUD includes deviations in Exhibit E, including reduced setbacks for carwashes and facilities with fuel pumps to internal property lines, reduced setbacks for dumpsters associated with facilities with fuel pumps from adjacent residential property lines, deviation to allow a directory sign where fewer than 8 independent uses are developed under a unified plan. EVALUATION CRITERIA: The proposed PUD meets the rezoning and PUD criteria established in the LDC and is consistent with the Goals, Objectives, and Policies of the Growth Management Plan. LDC and GMP references are provided below with responses in bold italics. Livingston Veterans CPUD, PL20220003226 Page 1 3 Updated: October 12, 2023 2600 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, Florida, 34105 Office 239.403.6700 Fax 239.261.1797 Fla Engineer CA 28275 Fla Landscape CA LC26000632 Fla Surveyor/Mapper LB8479 Packet Pg. 424 9.A.2.f PENINSULA��i ENGINEERING LDC Section 10.02.13 B.5.: a. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. The CPUD is a suitable location for commercial land uses as it is located at the signalized intersection on Livingston Road and Veterans Memorial Parkway. The project site has convenient access to adjacent roadways and available public utilities. Abutting property to the east and south is currently developed with 304 multifamily dwelling units. Approximately 2.5- acres of the proposed 4.68-acre CPUD is already commercially zoned (Ord. 2006-23); the remaining acreage is currently zoned Rural Agricultural and is not suitable for agricultural or low -density residential uses. The property is currently vacant and is sufficient size and dimensions to allow for small scale commercial and service uses for the adjacent residential and institutional land uses; thereby reducing vehicle miles traveled by surrounding property owners. The PUD provides a maximum trip cap and pedestrian and vehicular interconnection to the abutting multifamily project. As noted in the project Traffic Impact Statement, there is adequate capacity on the surrounding roadways to accommodate traffic associated with the uses proposed in the PUD. A surface water management system will be permitted through South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). b. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the County Attorney. The property that is subject to this PUD application is owned by Livingston Veterans Commercial, LLC. C. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives, policies, and the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan. A companion GMPA (PL20220003225) has been submitted. The amendment, if approved, would authorize the proposed CPUD. d. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. The CPUD will provide convenient commercial and service uses that are appropriately scaled to serve the needs of the surrounding residential and institutional uses and the existing traffic along Livingston Road, an arterial roadway. The proposed Master Plan identifies buffers that meet or exceed the requirements of the LDC and increased setbacks to the PUD boundaries to Livingston Veterans CPUD, PL20220003226 Page 14 Updated: October 12, 2023 2600 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, Florida, 34105 Office 239.403.6700 Fax 239.261.1797 Fla Engineer CA 28275 Fla Landscape CA LC26000632 Fla Surveyor/Mapper LB8479 Packet Pg. 425 9.A.2.f PENINSULA��i ENGINEERING ensure proposed uses are located in a manner that is compatible with and appropriately screened from adjacent uses. The proposed development standards, including minimum setbacks and proposed heights are compatible with surrounding development. The uses proposed as part of this CPUD primarily consist of those allowed in C-1 through C-3 zoning districts, with the exception of carwashes and self -storage uses. Carwashes are subject to supplemental standards of LDC 5.05.11 to ensure compatibility with adjacent residential uses. The CPUD proposes to also subject carwashes to the landscape standards of 5.05.05.D.2. to further enhance buffers adjacent to residential uses. Self -storage uses, if developed, will be limited to indoor, air-conditioned facilities that are designed to resemble an office building. These self -storage facilities generate significantly fewer trips and have far fewer impacts on surrounding developments than other commercial uses. Indoor self -storage uses have received zoning approval from Collier County to be located adjacent to single-family and multifamily residential developments, including, but not limited to, Goodlette Corners CPUD (Ord. 2004-40), Hiwasse CPUD (Ord. 2004-75), and BCHD 1 CPUD (Ord. 2021-20). e. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. The proposed CPUD will meet or exceed the 30% open space requirement. f. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. The proposed CPUD is located in an area where there is adequate infrastructure to support the proposed development. g. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. The proposed CPUD is a vacant infill site that is surrounded by roads to the north and west and existing development to the east and south. The proposed boundaries are finite and could not be expanded in the future. h. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. The proposed CPUD includes deviations that are justified as meeting public purposes. Please see Deviations and Justifications. LDC Section 10.02.08 F.: 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan. The proposed CPUD zoning designation will be consistent with the pending GMPA to the Livingston Road -Veterans Memorial Boulevard Commercial Infill Subdistrict. Livingston Veterans CPUD, PL20220003226 Page 1 5 Updated: October 12, 2023 2600 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, Florida, 34105 Office 239.403.6700 Fax 239.261.1797 Fla Engineer CA 28275 Fla Landscape CA LC26000632 Fla Surveyor/Mapper LB8479 Packet Pg. 426 9.A.2.f PENINSULA��i ENGINEERING 2. The existing land use pattern. The CPUD is a logical infill project based on the surrounding land use pattern. The property is located at the signalized intersection of Livingston Road and Veterans Memorial Boulevard with frontages along both roadways. The other two sides of the property (east and south) are adjacent to an existing 304-unit multifamily project that provides internal vehicular and pedestrian connections to this convenience commercial site. The site is an appropriate location to provide convenient commercial and service uses to serve the surrounding residential and institutional uses. The PUD proposes setbacks, heights and buffers consistent with the LDC to ensure compatibility with adjacent uses. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. The amendment does not create an isolated district that is unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. The PUD boundaries are logically drawn in relation to existing conditions. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary. The property is located at a signalized intersection that has seen extensive growth over the past twenty years. Property to the east and south is approved for 304 multifamily apartment units and a new high school will be opening in the fall. The companion GMPA designates the property as a commercial infill subdistrict and the proposed PUD application is required to establish commercial zoning on the property. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood The proposed PUD will not adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. The PUD proposes development standards including building setback and building heights that are consistent with the surrounding uses. The PUD will allow for convenience commercial and service uses to serve the needs of the adjacent neighborhoods. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. The application includes a Traffic Impact Statement which demonstrates that there is adequate capacity on the surrounding roadways to accommodate the trips associated with the uses proposed in the PUD. The development will construct a right turn lane along Livingston Road to Livingston Veterans CPUD, PL20220003226 Page 1 6 Updated: October 12, 2023 2600 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, Florida, 34105 Office 239.403.6700 Fax 239.261.1797 Fla Engineer CA 28275 Fla Landscape CA LC26000632 Fla Surveyor/Mapper LB8479 Packet Pg. 427 9.A.2.f PENINSULA��i ENGINEERING access the project. Additionally, the introduction of convenience commercial and service uses will reduce the vehicle miles traveled for the adjacent residential properties. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. The proposed amendment will not create a drainage problem. The development will be designed to meet stormwater requirements of Collier County and South Florida Water Management District. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. The proposed CPUD will not reduce light and air to adjacent properties. 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent area. The proposed CPUD should not have an adverse impact on property values in the adjacent areas. Development within the CPUD includes appropriate development standards and buffers to ensure compatibility with surrounding land uses. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. The proposed amendment will not create a deterrent to the improvement or redevelopment of adjacent properties. Properties that abut the project site are already developed without the ability to expand. The proposed commercial development is an infill project that is designed to fit into the surrounding development. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. The PUD is consistent with the requirements of the LDC and the GMP and does not constitute a grant of special privilege. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. The existing property is zoned C-1 and Agricultural. The amendment seeks to rezone both properties to CPUD and expand the list of permitted uses in order to provide convenient commercial and service uses to the surrounding community. The existing Agricultural zoning designation is limited to agricultural uses and/or one single-family dwelling which are not appropriate uses on a six -lane arterial road within the Urban designated portion of the County. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county The proposed CPUD is in scale with the needs of the neighborhood and County. The existing C-1 designated property is limited to 50,000 sf of floor area. The proposed CPUD expands the commercial acreage but maintains the 50,000 sf of commercial floor area and also proposes to Livingston Veterans CPUD, PL20220003226 Page 1 7 Updated: October 12, 2023 2600 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, Florida, 34105 Office 239.403.6700 Fax 239.261.1797 Fla Engineer CA 28275 Fla Landscape CA LC26000632 Fla Surveyor/Mapper LB8479 Packet Pg. 428 9.A.2.f PENINSULA��i ENGINEERING allow up to 100,000 sf of indoor self -storage floor area. A professional market demand analysis has been provided for the companion GMPA which concluded that there is demand for the proposed commercial uses. The CPUD proposes a maximum of 225 PM peak hour net trips to ensure the development is in scale with the needs of the neighborhood. 15. Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. While there may be other sites in the County that could accommodate the proposed uses, this is not the determining factor when evaluating the appropriateness of a zoning decision; each zoning amendment petition is reviewed on its own merit for compliance with the GMP and LDC. A portion of the subject property is already zoned commercial and is identified as a commercial infill subdistrict on the Future Land Use Map. The application is a logical expansion of the commercial districts into the vacant agriculturally -zoned parcel. With the opening of the new high school and the expansion of Veterans Memorial Boulevard to US41, this infill development site is an appropriate location for the commercial retail and service uses proposed by this CPUD. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. The property is well suited for commercial development and does not require substantial site alterations to make it usable. The property will only require clearing and minimal site grading 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code ch. 106, art. II], as amended. Public facilities are available to meet the requirements of the development. All levels of service will be maintained. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. The proposed CPUD is consistent with the GMP. The site has been designed to meet the requirements of the LDC and will not negatively impact surrounding land uses. CONSISTENCY WITH THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN FLUE Policy 5.6: New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code (Ordinance 04-41, adopted June 22, 2004 and effective October 18, 2004, as amended). Livingston Veterans CPUD, PL20220003226 Page 1 8 Updated: October 12, 2023 2600 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, Florida, 34105 Office 239.403.6700 Fax 239.261.1797 Fla Engineer CA 28275 Fla Landscape CA LC26000632 Fla Surveyor/Mapper LB8479 Packet Pg. 429 9.A.2.f PENINSULA��i ENGINEERING The proposed CPUD is compatible and complimentary with the surrounding land uses. This commercial infill development abuts higher density multi family residential uses and is proximate to existing and planned public school facilities. Its location at a signalized intersection of an arterial and collector roadway is an ideal location for community retail and services uses. The development provides development standards to ensure heights and intensities are compatible with surrounding uses and provides perimeter buffers to adjacent residential uses. The expanded CPUD is designed to be compatible with adjacent properties. FLUE Policy 5.7: Encourage the use of land presently designated for urban intensity uses before designating other areas for urban intensity uses. This shall occur by planning for the expansion of County owned and operated public facilities and services to the existing lands designated for urban intensity uses, the Rural Settlement District (formerly known as North Golden Gate), and the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, before servicing new areas. The is located within the Collier County Urban Area and is located at the intersection of an arterial and collector roadway. Properties to the north and south are developed and utilities are available to serve the development. This infill vacant property is ideal for urban intensity. FLUE Policy 7.1: The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. The CPUD has located at a signalized intersection and has direct access onto Livingston Road and Veterans Memorial Parkway. By expanding the commercial zoning to the Agriculturally zoned parcel to the south, the project will have enough frontage to provide an access onto Livingston Road that meets the County's spacing requirements. FLUE Policy 7.3: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and their interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. The adjacent Allura multifamily development that abuts the subject property to the east and south includes an interconnection to the subject property, as required by RPUD, Ord. 2019-22. The proposed commercial development will provide cross -access easement to the Allura development, which is shown on the Master Concept Plan (MCP) of the companion PUDZ. Transportation Policy 5.1: The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible Livingston Veterans CPUD, PL20220003226 Page 1 9 Updated: October 12, 2023 2600 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, Florida, 34105 Office 239.403.6700 Fax 239.261.1797 Fla Engineer CA 28275 Fla Landscape CA LC26000632 Fla Surveyor/Mapper LB8479 Packet Pg. 430 9.A.2.f PENINSULA��i ENGINEERING development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and c. For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project's significant impacts on all roadways. The CPUD limits the intensity of development to a maximum of 50,000 sf of commercial floor area and 100,000 sf of indoor self -storage floor area, subject to a trip cap of 225 adjusted PM Peak Hour Net External Trips (trips). The TIS submitted with this petition identifies three separate development scenarios to establish the trip cap. Based on the TIS, the project does not create any significant and adverse impacts to the area roadway network. None of the analyzed links are projected to operate below the adopted level of service (LOS) standard at the 2027 build -out conditions. CCME Objective 6.1: Protect native vegetative communities through the application of minimum preservation requirements. The 4.68-acre property is located outside of the Coastal High Hazard area and includes 4.44-acres of existing native vegetation of varying quality. Per LDC Section 3.05.07 B.1., the commercial development is required to preserve 10% of the existing native vegetation, or 0.44-acres. Due to the limited size of the development area and the inability to connect the required preservation area to other preserves, conservation areas, natural flowways or natural waterbodies, the development proposes to satisfy the on -site preserve requirements off site as permitted in LDC Section 3.05.07 H.1. f. CCME Objective 6.2: Protect and conserve wetlands and the natural functions of wetlands pursuant to the appropriate policies under Goal 6. Livingston Veterans CPUD, PL20220003226 Page 1 10 Updated: October 12, 2023 2600 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, Florida, 34105 Office 239.403.6700 Fax 239.261.1797 Fla Engineer CA 28275 Fla Landscape CA LC26000632 Fla Surveyor/Mapper LB8479 Packet Pg. 431 9.A.2.f PENINSULA��i ENGINEERING The proposed Master Concept Plan provides 3.26-acres of native preservation which includes a mix of Cypress wetlands and Pine Flatwoods. Any wetland impacts will be addressed during the state and federal environmental permitting processes. CCME Objective 7.1: Direct incompatible land uses away from listed animal species and their habitats. (The County relies on the listing process of State and Federal agencies to identify species that require special protection because of their endangered, threatened, or species of special concern status. Listed animal species are those species that the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission has designated as endangered, threatened, or species of special concern, in accordance with Rules 68A-27.003, 68A-27.004, and 68A-27.005, F.A.C. and those species designated by various federal agencies as Endangered and Threatened species published in 50 CFR 17 The subject property is bordered by Livingston Road to the west, Veterans Memorial Boulevard to the north and the Allura apartment development to the east and south. The property does not abut any off -site preserve or native vegetation areas. A Listed Species Survey was prepared and observe any state or federally listed species on the 4.68-acre site and found no listed species having a "possible" occurrence on the property. Livingston Veterans CPUD, PL20220003226 Updated: October 12, 2023 2600 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, Florida, 34105 Office 239.403.6700 Fax 239.261.1797 Page 1 11 Fla Engineer CA 28275 Fla Landscape CA LC26000632 Fla Surveyor/Mapper LB8479 Packet Pg. 432 9.A.2.f PENINSULA`S ENGINEERING `. LIVINGSTON VETERANS COMMERCIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DEVIATIONS & JUSTIFICATION Deviation #1: Relief from LDC Section 5.05.05 D.5. which requires dumpster enclosures associated with a facility with fuel pumps to provide a minimum fifty -foot setback from residential property lines to instead allow dumpster enclosures to be setback 30' from residential property lines. Justification: The proposed CPUD is an infill commercial development that is bounded by Livingston Road and Veterans Memorial Boulevard to the west and north, respectively, and by the existing Allura RPUD to the south and east. The property has limited depth, measuring approximately 300' from the Livingston Road right-of-way to the residential property line on the eastern boundary of the PUD. Should a gas station (facility with fuel pumps) be developed onsite, the proposed dumpster will be aligned with the Veterans Memorial Boulevard driveway in order to provide safe and sufficient access approach for garbage trucks. This will allow garbage trucks sufficient area to maneuver without conflicts with other vehicles, pedestrians, structures or gas pumps. The buffer between the proposed dumpster and the adjacent residential property line will be a minimum of 30 feet in width and include an 8' tall architecturally designed wall constructed on top of a berm. The berm will be maintained at a height of 3 feet. A 5-foot tall hedgerow consisting of #10 shrubs, spaced three feet on center and a row of canopy trees spaced 30 feet on center will be provided on both sides of the wall as required by LDC Section 5.05.05 D.2. Additional shrubs will be provided on the outside of the dumpster enclosure. The reduced setback will not negatively impact the adjacent residential property. The apartments to the east of the potential gas station are approximately 155 feet from the property line and are separated from the proposed CPUD by a surface parking lot, structured garages and a maintenance building, in addition to their landscape buffer. Dumpster enclosures for other uses are permitted much closer than 30' to a property line, as they are exempt from setbacks per LDC 5.03.04.A.2., which states dumpster enclosures "may be located within a required yard (setback) provided they do not encroach into landscape area." The proposed trash container will meet all other county standards as provided in LDC Section 5.03.04. A conceptual layout is provided showing a potential gas station layout with the anticipated dumpster location. PL20220003226, Livingston Veterans CPUD Revised October 12, 2023 Page 1 2600 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, Florida, 34105 Office 239.403.6700 Fax 239.261.1797 Fla Engineer CA 28275 Fla Landscape CA LC26000632 Fla Surveyor/Mapper LB8479 packet Pg. 433 9.A.2.f PENINSULA,) ENGINEERING Deviation #2: Relief from LDC Section 5.05.05.13.1. and 5.05.11.13.1, which requires a minimum side yard setback of 40' for all structures associated with a facility with fuel pumps and carwashes abutting residential zoning districts to instead allow a side yard setback of 15' when located on a side lot line that is internal to the PUD. Justification: The proposed CPUD currently consists of two parcels but will be developed as a single Site Development Plan (SDP) with shared infrastructure facilities. Since this will be a unified site, an increased setback from internal property line is not warranted. All facility with fuel pump structures will meet the increased setbacks to external property lines, except as noted within these deviations. PL20220003226, Livingston Veterans CPUD Revised October 12, 2023 Page 2 Packet Pg. 434 1 7 Z F 9.A.21 A I il•? ,.]s�Y'�i:�dt�i.1�R� ` sTi 0SG.l�`�:'..Ii l� ��_:.`�i: •'�':- n7!& ..�+i �sY�<.-'�_:a`5�. -:?�-. :�.,MT"A."v,Q,xa;�iw"2. - � _ k3 ii e L952= Otld yd= c � ALLURA BLDG #2 (3-STORY) FINISHED FLOOR ELEV 16.20 FT-N.A.V.D. O +I ALLURA BLDG #4 (3-STORY) FINISHED FLOOR ELEVTUM 16.25 FT-N.A.V.D. J� 5' 18' PARKING SDWK STALL ALLURA 24' DRIVE AISLE 24' DRIVE AISLE LIVINGSTON ROAD 0 - ZSCALE: 1" = 60' r F 18' PARKING ..0 •8.; • -w + 2' FLAT •° a STALL 10' r ! e 1a.44' � j/- �l •t ••" y°'$; 4•�e/isad��tjF�°e'� ,'°'ta."eati�. `a I a` .j p21�-`�L'•�W V-?�,T-o'-�"tl' S y ° ro- ;'°"2� 6' FENCE :� y,yt .r MIN. PERIMETER BERM ti MIN PERIMETER BERM = 14.60 FT-NAVD ALLURA 18PARKING STALL 1L— J1 1L4 3 AVERAGE EXIST.GRADE = t12.00 18' PARKING STALL 24' DRIVE AISLE ±60' PROPOSED STORMWATER MGMT AREA A SECTION SCALE: 1" = 10' 6 SECTION SCALE: 1" = 10' �1 4 PROPOSED COMMERCIAL 2' 0.67' 8.14' 24' DRIVE AISLE PENINSULAIIIiiIIof ENGINEERING % • CIVIL ENGINEERING • LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE • PLANNING AND ZONING • SURVEYING • ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES • LAND DEVELOPMENT 239.403.6700 Pen-Eng.com PROJECT: LIVINGSTON VETERANS COMMERCIAL TITLE: LIVINGSTON VETERANS CPUD CONCEPTUAL LAND PLAN AND CROSS SECTIONS CLIENT: LIVINGSTON VETERANS COMMERCIAL, LLC. REVISIONS: No: Revision: Date: X NOTES: Q fi M N 18' PARKING 6' STALL COMMERCIAL BUILDING y (1-STORY W/ TOWER) ASSUMED FINISHED FLOOR ELEV 16.50 FT-N.A.V.D. •b ��• + °.�}tom' ° - •-• �''�°�. ° A 12.83` ° ,"� 1 AISLE E a ; •y °, 20.19' ° n or2Y ,t, d "7 • > .}�:. , d• .. ai•dtX .•'tl ••l �f �'•�Q•y •'• Pl •4°•k i•V: sY'R•t a. f, �Yf p'b Z. 'rr. V liu ddkt %Cr•. 3i1 `MIN. PERIMETER BERM 1 L3 (MIN. T ABOVE GAS 3 STATION PARKING) AVERAGE EXIST.GRADE=±11.90 GAS STATION 15' DRIVE AISLE PROFESSIONAL SEALS: PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER: FLORIDA LICENSE NUMBER: 20' PARKING Florida Engineering Certificate of Authorization #28275 STALL 8' SDWK Florida Landscape Certificate of Authorization #LC26000632 DATUM NOTE: ALL ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON NAVD 88 (NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988). N Bar Scale: 1" = 10' 0 2.5' 5' 10' 20' 30' BOLLARD > > SEC: TWP:48S RGE: 25E GAS STATION/CONVIENCE STORE ASSUMED FIN SHOEDYFLOOR ELEV City: NAPLES County: COLLIER 16.50 FT-N.A.V.D. Designed by: A. SPAGNOLA Drawn by: A. SPAGNOLA Date: MARCH 2O23 Horizontal Scale: ill = 10' Vertical Scale: N.T.S. File Name: P-LIVC-001-001-X08.dw9 Project Number: P-LIVC-001-001 Sheet ID: XO Sheet Number: 01 of 01 r 0 IL U rn C L d O N O C J O N N M O O O N N O N J IL ti N Packet Pg. 435 9.A.2.f PENINSULA %'�j�E ENGINEERING LIVINGSTON ROAD VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD. COMMERCIAL LISTED SPECIES SURVEY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA PREPARED BY: PENINSULA ENGINEERING 2600 GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY NAPLES, FL 34105 NOVEMBER 2022 BRUCE LAYMAN, SPWS Packet Pg. 436 9.A.2.f PENINSULA ENCINURINC LIVINGSTON/VETERANS COMMERCIAL LISTED SPECIES SURVEY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................ 2. PROJECT METHODOLOGY................................................................................................................ 2.1. Listed Wildlife Survey............................................................................................................... 2.2. Listed Plant Survey................................................................................................................... 2.3. Habitat/Vegetation Survey....................................................................................................... 3. SURVEY RESULTS.............................................................................................................................. 3.1. Listed Wildlife Species Observed On-Site................................................................................ 3.2. Listed Wildlife Species Not Observed On -Site But with Low to Moderate Probability of Occurring.............................................................................................................................................. 3.3. Other Listed Wildlife Species Warranting Consideration......................................................... 3.4. Listed Plant Species Observed On-Site..................................................................................... 3.5. Habitat/Vegetation Survey....................................................................................................... 4. SUMMARY........................................................................................................................................ 4.1. Listed Plant & Wildlife Species................................................................................................. 5. REFERENCES CITED........................................................................................................................... TABLES Table 1- Listed Species and Vegetation Survey Details .................................................... Table 2 - Listed Plant and Wildlife Species Observed....................................................... Table 3 - Non -listed Wildlife Species Observed................................................................ Table 4 - Estimated Probability of Occurrence of Non -Observed Listed Faunal Species Table 5 - Estimated Probability of Occurrence of Non -Observed Listed Floral Species Table 6 - Existing Vegetative Associations and Land Uses .............................................. APPENDICES Appendix A - Existing Vegetation Association & Land Use Descriptions FIGURES Figure 1— Existing Conditions 3 3 3 4 4 5 5 5 5 6 7 7 7 8 10 10 10 11 11 11 2 P:\Active_Projects\P-LIVC-001\001_GMPA and PUD\Reports Packet Pg. 437 9.A.2.f PENINSULA ENGINEERING LIVINGSTON/VETERANS COMMERCIAL LISTED SPECIES SURVEY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA 1. INTRODUCTION Peninsula Engineering, Inc. entered into a contractual agreement with Livingston Veterans Commercial, LLC to provide environmental services associated with a 4.68-acre parcel of land (Project) known as Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard Commercial. The Project is located in Section 13, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. It is bordered on the north by Veterans Memorial Blvd. and residential development, on the east and south by residential development, and on the west by Livingston Road and undeveloped land. The Environmental Data author credentials include undergraduate and graduate degrees in the environmental sciences and full-time employment as an Environmental Consultant/Ecologist in Lee and Collier Counties since 1992. A protected species survey was conducted on the project site and is summarized herein to provide support documentation for local, state, and federal development review. 2. PROJECT METHODOLOGY Peninsula Engineering conducted a survey of the Project site using a field methodology in general accordance with Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) standards. This survey was performed to document vegetation associations and to locate and document any listed plant or wildlife species that occur on the site during the survey period. The field surveys for this project were conducted during July 2021 and October 2022 and the following information provides detailed project methodologies for the listed wildlife survey, the habitat/vegetation survey, and the listed plant species survey. 2.1. Listed Wildlife Survey Priorto the listed species survey, coloraerial imagerywas reviewed to identify the habitats present on and adjacent to the site. Based on the habitat types identified, a preliminary list of state and federal listed flora and fauna that might occur on the project site was determined. The preliminary list included the Florida bonneted bat (Eumops floridanus), the gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus), and the Big Cypress fox squirrel (Sciurus niger avicennia). Additionally, various publications and databases were also reviewed to identify the listed plant and wildlife species that could occur and those that had been documented on or near the project site (e.g., Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission [FWC]). FWC's Florida's Imperiled Species Management Plan (FWC 2016) was used to determine the "listed" state and federal status designation of wildlife species. Notes on Florida's Endangered and Threatened Plants was used to determine the status of listed plants (Weaver and Anderson, 2010). Peninsula Engineering conducted a biological survey of the project site using a field methodology that was in general accordance with FWC standards. The field survey team consisted of one biologist performing parallel meandering pedestrian transects spaced approximately 75'-100' feet apart depending on type of habitat, visibility limits, and density of vegetation. The approximate location of parallel pedestrian transects performed during the listed species and habitat survey are indicated on Figure 1 titled Existing Conditions. Pedestrian transects were conducted in the morning hours of July 16, 2021 totaling 4.0 hours of field time. Table 1 lists survey date, time, weather conditions, biologist conducting survey, and 3 P:\Active_Projects\P-LIVC-001\001_GMPA and PUD\Reports Packet Pg. 438 9.A.2.f PENINSULA ENGINEERING LIVINGSTON/VETERANS COMMERCIAL LISTED SPECIES SURVEY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA field hours during the field survey. Field observers were generally equipped with a compass, aerials, wildlife and plant identification books, binoculars, and a field notebook. During listed species transects, the biologist periodically stopped, looked for wildlife, signs of wildlife, and listened for wildlife vocalizations. Had listed species been observed, their approximate locations and their numbers would have been mapped on aerials and recorded in a field notebook on a daily basis. In the same fashion, non -listed wildlife species were recorded daily. The above survey methodologies were generally consistent with those prescribed by the FWC in the document titled "Wildlife Methodology Guidelines for Section 18.D of the Application for Development Approval" (FWC 1988) except that no small mammal sampling or herpetofaunal surveys were conducted. 2.2. Listed Plant Survey Over the course of conducting the survey for listed wildlife, the PE ecologist searched for plants listed by the Florida Department of Agriculture (FDA) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and those species defined by Collier County as rare and less rare. The state and federal agencies have categorized the various plant species based upon their relative abundance in natural communities. Those categorizations include "Endangered", "Threatened", and "Commercially Exploited". The protection afforded plants listed solely by FDA entails restrictions on harvesting or destroying plants found on private lands of another, or public lands, without permission and/or a permit from FDA. Unless the sale of plants is involved, there are no restrictions for landowners to impact such plants. These provisions are found in Section 581.185, FDA under State law. Rare and less rare species are protected in accordance with Collier County LDC Section 3.04.03. 2.3. Habitat/Vegetation Survey The habitat and vegetation survey included the preparation of a Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCCS) map delineating the major vegetation communities, landforms, and land uses present on the project site. A FLUCCS Map for the project site is provided in Figure 1 titled Existing Conditions. The methods and class descriptions found in the FLUCCS manual (FDOT, 1999) were generally followed when delineating and assigning areas to an appropriate FLUCCS category (class) or "codes". Plant communities were mapped using direct field observation and aerial photo interpretation. Current color aerial photos were plotted at 1" = 50' scale and were used in the field to map on -site vegetative communities. 4 P:\Active_Projects\P-LIVC-001\001_GMPA and PUD\Reports Packet Pg. 439 9.A.2.f PENINSULA ENGINEERING LIVINGSTON/VETERANS COMMERCIAL LISTED SPECIES SURVEY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA A factor in mapping vegetative associations and local habitats is the invasion by the exotic plant species, such as melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenervia) and Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius). Exotic vegetation on the site was primarily represented by both named species. Four levels of exotic density are defined and mapped using photo interpretation and field observation. Code modifiers are normally appended to the FLUCCS code to indicate the approximate density of exotic vegetation in the canopy or understory, as follows: E1 = Exotics 10-24% E2 = Exotics 25-49% E3 = Exotics 50-74% E4 = Exotics 75-84% 3. SURVEYRESULTS 3.1. Listed Wildlife Species Observed On Site Typically, following would be a summary of the listed wildlife species observed on site and the ramifications of the presence of each species; however, no state or federal listed wildlife were observed on site duringthe survey. Therefore, there is no such Figure in this report and the proposed PUD rezone is consistent with CCME Policy 7.1. Non -listed wildlife species were noted during the surveys and a list of those species is provided in Table 3. 3.2. Listed Wildlife Species Not Observed On Site But with Moderate Probability of Occurring The following is a discussion of listed wildlife species that were not confirmed during the survey as occurring on the Project site but which are considered to have probability of occurring due to the presence of suitable habitat or confirmed sightings in the region. These species are those identified as having a "possible" estimated occurrence in Table 4. There are no listed species having a "possible" estimated occurrence in Table 4. 3.3. Other Listed Wildlife Species Warranting Consideration Following is a discussion of listed wildlife species that have not been confirmed as occurring on the project site but which are considered to be potential visitors to the site due to the presence of suitable habitat or previous known sightings in the region. These species are those identified as having an "unlikely" estimated occurrence in Table 4. Eastern Indigo Snake The Eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon corais couperi) is listed by both the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and the FWC as Threatened, primarily due to historic commercial harvest for the 5 P:\Active_Projects\P-LIVC-001\001_GMPA and PUD\Reports Packet Pg. 440 9.A.2.f PENINSULA ENGINEERING LIVINGSTON/VETERANS COMMERCIAL LISTED SPECIES SURVEY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA pet industry. Generally, this species lives and hunts in a wide variety of habitats and their territories can cover large areas. No indigo snakes were observed on site; the site lacks burrows and habitat features that might otherwise support the species; and the adjacent land is under construction or is already improved as Livingston or Veterans Memorial roadways. Therefore, there is minimal potential for this species to occur on site. Florida bonneted bat The Florida bonneted bat (Eumops floridanus) is federally listed as Endangered. Little is known about the species; however, the presence of cavities or hollows within large and tall relatively uncluttered trees has been identified by FWS as a potentially important resource to support bonneted bat maternity roosts. Also, the FWS has determined that projects that result in the loss of greater than 50 acres of foraging habitat may impair an individual bat's ability to feed or breed. Two pine snags containing cavities of sufficient size to potentially support roosting by the bonneted bat were observed during the listed species survey. No signs of use by bats, such as smudging or the odor of guano, were detected at either snag. The cavities in both trees will be peeped using a wireless video recorder during state and federal environmental permitting to document bat presence/absence. Given the lack of external signs of cavity use, it is unlikely that the bonneted bat is using either for roosting. Additionally, since the Project is less than 20 acres in size, by following the FWS 2019 Consultation Guidelines (FWS, 2019) forthe species, the project is not likely to have an adverse affect on the species. Big Cypress fox squirrel The Big Cypress fox squirrel (Sciurus niger avicennia) is listed as Threatened by the FWC and is considered a wetland dependent species by SFWMD. They are not assigned a special status designation by the FWS. No fox squirrels or signs of fox squirrels were observed within the project limits during the listed species survey. The site is vegetatively isolated due to major existing roadways on two sides of the property and on -going construction on the remaining two sides. Additionally, half of the site lacks the open park -like habitat structure that this species prefers, and the other half is composed of exotic -dominated vegetation. Given habitat isolation and the unfavorable habitat composition, the potential for this species to use the site is unlikely. 3.4. Listed Plant Species Observed On Site One (1) species of listed plants (listed per FDA list; and identified as "less rare" by Collier County LDC) was observed on site during the field survey. The species observed was the stiff -leafed wild pine (Tillandsia fasciculata). The location of a representative specimen is shown on the attached FLUCCS Map. No permit is required by FDA to impact the plant (so long as sale of the plants is not involved), and Collier County LDC Section 3.04.03 does not require rare or less rare plants to be relocated to off -site preserves (which is being proposed by the owner). Therefore, no further action is required for the species observed. No federal listed plant species were observed on site. Additional listed plant species are capable of occurring on site based on the presence of suitable habitat. A list of those species is provided in Table 5. 6 P:\Active_Projects\P-LIVC-001\001_GMPA and PUD\Reports Packet Pg. 441 9.A.2.f PENINSULA ENGINEERING LIVINGSTON/VETERANS COMMERCIAL LISTED SPECIES SURVEY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA 3.5. Habitat/Vegetation Survey The whole site has a slash pine canopy — the northern half having been degraded by Hurricane Irma (per aerial imagery and observed deadfall), exotic vegetation infestation, and power line maintenance (topped trees). The southern half of the site includes a dense saw palmetto groundcover with little else present. The property is vegetatively isolated due to adjacent roadways and ongoing residential construction. The FLUCCS code for each community along with a brief description and acreage are provided in Table 6. A detailed description of each FLUCCS code is provided in Appendix B. Figure 1 titled Existing Conditions provides a map showing regional development and the vegetative associations found on the project site. The 4.68-acre property is located outside of the Coastal High Hazard area and includes 4.44 acres of existing native vegetation of varying quality. Per LDC Section 3.05.07 B.1., the commercial development is required to preserve 10% of the existing native vegetation, or 0.44 acres. Due to the limited size of the development area and the inability to connect the required preservation area to other preserves, conservation areas, natural flowways or natural water bodies, the development proposes to satisfy the on -site preserve requirements off site as permitted in LDC Section 3.05.07 H.1.f. The mechanism to satisfy the off -site preservation (land donation or financial contribution) will be addressed during development review. 4. SUMMARY The following is a summary of the potential impacts of the proposed project to listed species. 4.1. Listed Plant & Wildlife Species The results of the listed species survey indicated that there are no listed wildlife occurring on site. The single state and County -listed plant species observed on site are relatively common to Southwest Florida. There are no state regulations prohibiting the owner from impacting them. Collier County LDC Section 3.04.03 does not require rare or less rare plants to be relocated to off - site preserves (which is being proposed by the owner). Therefore, no further action is required. There are potential state and federal listed wildlife species that could theoretically occur; however, due to the site's vegetative isolation, its general lack of suitable habitat, and its position in the relatively urban landscape, there is little possibility of their occurrence. Therefore, the project is not anticipated to have a measurable adverse affect on them. 7 P:\Active_Projects\P-LIVC-001\001_GMPA and PUD\Reports Packet Pg. 442 9.A.2.f PENINSULA ENGINEERING LIVINGSTON/VETERANS COMMERCIAL LISTED SPECIES SURVEY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA 5. REFERENCESCITED Florida Department of Transportation. 1999. Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System Procedure No. 550-010-001-a. Third Edition. Tallahassee, Florida. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. 2016. Florida's Imperiled Species Management Plan 2016-2026. Tallahassee, Florida. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. 1988. Wildlife Methodology Guidelines. Tallahassee, Florida. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2019. Florida Bonneted Bat Consultation Guidance. South Florida Ecological Services Office. Vero Beach, Florida. Weaver, R. E. and P. J. Anderson. 2010. Notes on Florida's Endangered and Threatened Plants. Contribution No. 38, 5th edition. 8 P:\Active_Projects\P-LIVC-001\001_GMPA and PUD\Reports Packet Pg. 443 P E N I N S U L A. ENGINEERING LIVINGSTON/VETERANS COMMERCIAL LISTED SPECIES SURVEY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA TABLES R L d d O J N N M O O O N N O N J a a 9 P:\Active_Projects\P-LIVC-001\001_GMPA and PUD\Reports Packet Pg. 444 PENINSULA ENGINEERING LIVINGSTON/VETERANS COMMERCIAL LISTED SPECIES SURVEY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA Table 1: Listed Species and Vegetation Survey Details Biologist Date TimeofDay Weather Field Hours Bruce Layman 07/16/21 8:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m. 75°F, clear, calm 4.0 Bruce Layman 10/08/22 8:30 a.m. -10:30 a.m. 747, partly cloudy, NW wind 5 mph. 2.0 Total Hours 6.0 Table 2: Listed Plant and Wildlife Species Observed Common Name Scientific Name Site Habitat by FLUCCS FWC Status FWS Status FDA Status PLANTS Common air plant Tillandsia fasciculata All N/A N/A E WILDLIFE None All N/A N/A N/A FDA = Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services FWC = Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission FWS = United States Fish & Wildlife Service C E = Commercially Exploited E = Endangered N/A = Not Applicable Table 3: Non -listed Wildlife Species Observed Common Name Scientific Name BIRDS Northern cardinal Cardinalis cardinalis Blue jay Cyanocitta cristata Red -bellied woodpecker Melanerpes carolinus Mourning dove Zenaida macroura Gray catbird Dumetella carolinensis Northern mockingbird Mimus polyglottos AMPHIBIANS & REPTILES Cuban anole Anolis sagrei MAMMALS Rabbit (scat) Sylvilogus floridanus Gray squirrel Sciurus caroliniensis Nine -banded armadillo (tracks) Dasypus novemcinctus 9.A.2.f 10 P:\Active_Projects\P-LIVC-001\001_GMPA and PUD\Reports Packet Pg. 445 PENINSULA ENGINEERING LIVINGSTON/VETERANS COMMERCIAL LISTED SPECIES SURVEY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA Table 4: Estimated Probability of Occurrence of Non -Observed Listed Faunal Species Status Estimated Occurrence* Common Name Scientific Name (FWC/FWS) Probable Possible Unlikely Habitat by BIRDS None MAMMALS Big Cypress fox squirrel Sciurus ni er avicennia T X 411,416 Florida bonneted bat Eumo s oridanus E X 411,416 REPTILES Eastern indigo snake Dr marchon corais cou eri T X 411,416 AMPHIBIANS None FWC = Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission FWS = United States Fish and Wildlife Service T =Threatened E = Endangered * Probable Occurrence = >50% estimated chance of occurrence on site. Possible Occurrence = <50% estimated chance of occurrence on site. Unlikely Occurrence = <5% estimated chance of occurrence on site. Table 5: Estimated Probability of Occurrence of Non -Observed Listed Floral Species Status Estimated Occurrence* Common Name Scientific Name (FDA/FWS) Probable Possible Unlikely Habitat by FLUCCS Wild pine (several) Tillandsia species T & E/NL X 411,416 FWS = United States Fish and Wildlife Service T = Threatened FDA = Food and Drug Administration E = Endangered NL = Not Listed * Probable Occurrence =>50% estimated chance of occurrence on site. Possible Occurrence = <50%estimated chance of occurrence on site. Unlikely Occurrence = <5% estimated chance of occurrence on site. Table 6: Existing Vegetative Associations and Land Uses FLUCCS CODE FLUCCS DESCRIPTION TOTAL ACRES 411E2 Pine flatwoods, palmetto understory, Exotics 25%-49% 1.60 411E3 Pine flatwoods, palmetto understory, Exotics 50%-74% 0.32 416E3 Pine flatwoods, graminoid understory, Exotics 50%-74% 2.52 740 Disturbed land 0.24 OTAL 4.68 9.A.2.f 11 P:\Active_Projects\P-LIVC-001\001_GMPA and PUD\Reports Packet Pg. 446 PENINSULA . ENGINEERING LIVINGSTON/VETERANS COMMERCIAL LISTED SPECIES SURVEY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA APPENDIX A Existing Vegetative Association & Land Use Descriptions 12 P:\Active_Projects\P-LIVC-001\001_GMPA and PUD\Reports Packet Pg. 447 9.A.2.f PENINSULA ENGINEERING LIVINGSTON/VETERANS COMMERCIAL LISTED SPECIES SURVEY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA Existing Vegetative Association & Land Use Detailed Descriptions Pine Flatwoods — Palmetto Understory (FLUCCS 411) — This area is dominated by a slash pine (Pinus elliottii) canopy over a saw palmetto (Serenoa repens) dominated groundcover. Melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenervia), Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius), and ear -leaf acacia (Acacia auriculiformis) are present in the canopy and midstory. Bracken fern (Pteridium aquilinum) commonly exists in the openings in the saw palmetto and grape vine (Vitis rotundifolia) is present where there are openings in the canopy allowing sunlight to reach the forest floor. Pine Flatwoods — Graminoid Understory (FLUCCS 416) - This area is dominated by a slash pine canopy over little groundcover. Melaleuca, Brazilian pepper, and ear -leaf acacia are present in the canopy and midstory. Grape vine commonly exists in the openings in the canopy allowing sunlight to reach the forest floor. The canopy was heavily damaged during the passing of Hurricane Irma in 2017. Disturbed Land (FLUCCS 740) — This represents the edge of the Livingston Road right-of-way where the land appears to have been cleared for roadway construction. It has grown in with bracken fern, slash pine saplings, shrubby false buttonweed (Spermacoce verticillata), broomsedge (Andropogon virginicus), Mexican clover (Richardia brasiliensis), frogfruit (Phyla nodiflora) and other ruderal herbaceous species. Exotics 10-24% (Major FLUCCS Code + E1) This classification refers to a vegetative community that has been invaded by the exotic species Brazilian pepper such that it comprises 10 percent but no more than 24 percent of the vegetative cover. Exotics 25-49% (Major FLUCCS Code + E2) This additional classification refers to a vegetative community that has been invaded by Brazilian pepper and comprises 25 percent but no more that 49 percent of the vegetative cover. Exotics 50-75% (Maior FLUCCS Code + E3) This additional classification refers to a vegetative community that has been invaded by Brazilian pepper and comprises 50 percent but no more that 75 percent of the vegetative cover. Exotics >75% (Maior FLUCCS Code + E4) This additional classification refers to a vegetative community that has been invaded by Brazilian pepper and comprises greater than 75 percent of the vegetative cover, still retains at least 10% native tree canopy coverage. 13 P:\Active_Projects\P-LIVC-001\001_GMPA and PUD\Reports Packet Pg. 448 PENINSULA . ENGINEERING LIVINGSTON/VETERANS COMMERCIAL LISTED SPECIES SURVEY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA R L d d O J to N N M O O O N N O N J a ti v co FIGURE 1 N Existing Conditions c 0 m 1* N N N C O O v Q W C d E t v R a E 2 a 14 P:\Active_Projects\P-LIVC-001\001_GMPA and PUD\Reports Packet Pg. 449 PENINSULA ENGINEERING LIVINGSTON/VETERANS COMMERCIAL LISTED SPECIES SURVEY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA ` ,L TREE WITH CAVIh i r II �� 740 —/�. i to z r 4. 0 50' 100' 200 400 GOD LEGEND PARCEL BOUNDARY FLUCCS LIMITS --�- MEANDERING PEDESTRIAN TRANSECT(2022j NATIVE HABITAT PER COLLIER COU" * T€LLANDSIA FASCICILATA TM) VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD A LAL PHOTOGRAPHY COPYRIGHT OF C.-- GOURTY 1.0—TY APPRMSER 20 _2 FLUCCS AREA CODE DESCRIPTION (AC) d11 F2 PINE FLATWOODS PALMETTO 1.fi0 UNDERSTORY (EXOTICS 2545%) d11 E3 PINE FLATWOODS PALMETTO 0-32 UNDERSTORY(EXOTICS 50.7E%) d1fiE3 PINE FLATWOODS - GRAMINO[D 2-ice UNDERSTORY (EXOTICS 50-75%) 740 DISTURBED LANDS 0�a 4.68 Pr-10JELT'. �. 9WN£IEiEL1FNTiGONSVLTMl7- SeC' 13 1 1-5 — 2- °e�ignen oy' HR[1GE L�.YMAR ervlruS I A LIVINGSTON °a ey AN ON aCHAFFER ENGINEERING LIVINGSTON °ap. NOVEL GQ 2Q22 VETERANS EXISTING VETERANS "w,�,�v 1—M. CONDITIONS COMMERCIAL, LLC. C-001-001 104 za9.aos.e�ao COMMERCIAL F•eN � P�iv-X04I-x0a C—X04 9.A.2.f 15 P:\Active_Projects\P-LIVC-001\001_GMPA and PUD\Reports Packet Pg. 450 9.A.2.f TREBILCOCK CONSULTING SOLUTIONS Traffic Impact Statement Livingston Veterans Commercial Planned Unit Development Prepared for: Peninsula Engineering 2600 Golden Gate Parkway Naples, FL 34105 Phone: 239.403.6700 Collier County, Florida 1/23/2024 Prepared by: Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 2800 Davis Boulevard, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239.566.9551 Email: ntrebilcock@trebilcock.biz Collier County Transportation Methodology Fee — $ 500.00* Collier County Transportation Review Fee — Malor Study Fee — $1,500.00* Note — *to be collected at time of first submittal Packet Pg. 451 9.A.2.f Livingston Veterans — Commercial Planned Unit Development — Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 Statement of Certification I certify that this Traffic Impact Statement has been prepared by me or under my immediate supervision and that I have experience and training in the field of Traffic and Transportation Engineering. Norman J. Trebilcock, AICP, PTOE, PE FL Registration No. 47116 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 2800 Davis Boulevard, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34104 Company Cert. of Auth. No. 27796 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 2 Packet Pg. 452 9.A.2.f Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 Table of Contents ProjectDescription.......................................................................................................................................4 TripGeneration.............................................................................................................................................6 Trip Distribution and Assignment.................................................................................................................9 BackgroundTraffic...................................................................................................................................... 11 Existing and Future Roadway Network....................................................................................................... 11 Project Traffic Impacts — Roadway Link Analysis........................................................................................ 13 SiteAccess Analysis..................................................................................................................................... 14 ImprovementAnalysis................................................................................................................................ 16 Mitigationof Impact...................................................................................................................................16 Appendices Appendix A: Project Master Site Plan........................................................................................................17 Appendix B: Initial Meeting Checklist (Methodology Meeting).................................................................19 Appendix C: ITE Trip Generation Calculations........................................................................................... 26 Appendix D: Veterans Memorial Boulevard Improvements.....................................................................54 Appendix E: Transportation Element Map TR - 5...................................................................................... 57 Appendix F: 2023 AUIR — TCMA Report — Northwest TCMA.................................................................... 59 Appendix G: Transportation Element Map TR - 7..................................................................................... 61 Appendix H: Transportation Element Map TR - 3.....................................................................................63 Appendix I: Access Management Policy — Table 1....................................................................................65 Appendix J: Turning Movements Exhibits.................................................................................................. 67 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 1 3 Packet Pg. 453 9.A.2.f Livingston Veterans — Commercial Planned Unit Development — Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 Project Description The Livingston Veterans project is a proposed commercial development located in the southeast quadrant of the intersection of Livingston Road (County Road 881) and Veterans Memorial Boulevard, in Collier County, Florida. The approximate location of the subject site is illustrated in Figure 1. The proposed master site plan is illustrated in Appendix A: Project Master Site Plan. Figure 1— Project Location Map N❑� 9 9. Talis Parlc-;-:F-:I�B I -A ''North aples qua H'eeek ~ Middle Schook� [, Cary C�ub4 .� t0a€ Golf C ub q bt Thera n9� 1-41 rot quail Creek a _ .� YlllagLnda9 ''J o �� ■ ,'L-ngshdreLake L2PIeya Golf Cl ub� _ ►►►►►►JJJJJJ ■ I 111 i , _ t 'r1 Y WI ACRES RY �mi y°n In*n•. jp s-i-� r V F atc JCki-l�loh� Seed to TahlztF+ • r +1F�"w ImmeMNi i1E— � Immokdee Ad G t. 3Ens Clu6� �WalmartSlipercentzrv:1;,, j Target � no'aChildren ■ IN7seumoFC!s rr Naples ' — Go CadArrowk _. _ �-=� °3 North:Col xG�I The subject project site is currently vacant. The site is currently zoned as A (Agriculture) and C-1 (Commercial Professional and General Office District). The development team requests to rezone the property to Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) to allow C-1 commercial uses. The purpose of this report is to document the transportation impacts associated with the proposed zoning application which requests to allow development of 50,000 square feet (sf) of commercial uses and 100,000 sf of indoor self -storage use. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 14 Packet Pg. 454 9.A.2.f Livingston Veterans — Commercial Planned Unit Development — Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 For traffic evaluation purposes, the project proposes 3 development scenarios: - Up to 6,000 square feet (sf) gas station with 12 fueling stations and a car wash, and 11,000 sf commercial center; or - Up to 6,000 sf gas station with 12 fueling stations and a car wash, and 80,000 sf indoor self -storage; or - Up to 50,000 sf of Shopping Center. This traffic report is in agreement with the latest adopted Collier County Traffic Impact Study (TIS) Guidelines and Procedures. The project provides the highest and best use scenario with respect to the project's proposed trip generation. Consistent with the recommendations illustrated in Collier County Traffic Impact Study Guidelines and Procedures, traffic generation associated with the proposed development is evaluated based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 11t" Edition and ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition. In agreement with the ITE Land Use Code (LUC) descriptions, the ITE land use designations are illustrated in Table 1. Table 1 Development Program Land Use [SIC Code in ITE Land Use Code Total Size brackets] ` Development Scenario 1 Commercial [All PUD permitted uses typical for a #822 —Strip Retail Plaza 11,000 square feet shopping center] Gas Station [5541] #945 —Convenience Store/Gas Station 12 fueling stations with Car Wash [7542] (6,000 square feet) Development Scenario 2 IIndoor Self -Storage [4225] #151— Mini -Warehouse 80,000 square feet I Gas Station [5541] I 12 fueling stations #945 —Convenience Store/Gas Station I with Car Wash [7542] (6,000 square feet) Development Scenario 3 Commercial [All PUD permitted uses typical for a #821— Shopping Plaza (40-150k) 50,000 square feet shopping center] In order to provide more flexibility, the development will have the ability to adjust proposed parameters by converting the proposed commercial uses, subject to size and trip cap limitations, as applicable. For the purposes of this analysis, the traffic planning horizon year is assumed to be 2028. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 15 Packet Pg. 455 9.A.2.f Livingston Veterans — Commercial Planned Unit Development — Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 A methodology memorandum was transmitted via email to the Collier County Transportation Review staff on December 8, 2022. For details refer to Appendix B: Initial Meeting Checklist (Methodology Meeting). The project proposes one connection to Livingston Road and one access on Veterans Memorial Boulevard. In addition, a vehicular interconnect is proposed to the adjacent residential development to the east. Trip Generation The software program OTISS (Online Traffic Impact Study Software, most current version) is used to evaluate the projected trip generation for the project. The ITE equations and/or rates are used for the trip generation calculations, as applicable. The ITE — OTISS trip generation calculation worksheets are provided in Appendix C: ITE Trip Generation Calculations. Gas Station Traffic Comparison Gas Station land use — a trip generation comparison is provided between the available ITE land use variables: convenience store square footage and number of vehicle fueling positions (refer to Appendix C). The convenience store square footage generates the highest traffic impact and it is utilized for the purposes of this report. Car Wash Land Use A car wash facility is proposed as an additional service provided by the gas station. Based on established transportation practices which relate to gas station facilities, the traffic generated by the car wash is considered incidental to the traffic generated by the gas station land use. Internal Trip Capture The internal capture accounts for a reduction in external traffic because of the interaction between the multiple land uses in a site. Although it is expected that some trips between the proposed on -site land uses will be made without travel on the off -site street system (internal capture), per ITE latest recommendations the internal capture is conservatively not considered for this analysis. Pass -by Trips The pass -by trips account for traffic that is already on the external roadway network and stops at the project on the way to a primary trip destination. It should be noted that the driveway volumes are not reduced as a result of the pass -by reduction, only the traffic added to the surrounding streets and intersections. As such, pass -by trips are not deducted for operational turn lane analysis (all external traffic is accounted for). Based on the information illustrated in the ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition pass -by capture for Shopping Centers is 34% for PM peak hour traffic. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 6 Packet Pg. 456 9.A.2.f Livingston Veterans — Commercial Planned Unit Development — Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 Per Collier County TIS Guidelines and Procedures, the pass -by capture for Shopping Centers should not exceed 25% for the peak hour traffic and the daily capture rate should be assumed to be 10% lower than the peak hour capture rate. Consistent with a conservative approach, this analysis calculates pass -by trip percentages for Shopping Centers as follows: AM/PM peak hour rates at 25% and the daily capture rates at 15%. Consistent with the recommendations illustrated in the ITE Trip Generation Handbook and Collier County TIS Guidelines and Procedures, the pass -by capture rate for Gasoline Stations with and without Convenience Store should not exceed 50% for the peak hour traffic. For the purposes of this analysis the pass -by trip capture rate for the proposed Gas Station is considered as follows: AM/PM peak hour rates at 50% and the daily capture rates at 40%. Per FDOT's (Florida Department of Transportation) Site Impact Handbook (Section 2.4.4) the number of pass -by trips should not exceed 10% of the adjacent street traffic. The FDOT presents this factor as a measure of reasonableness and illustrates that it is a rule -of -thumb and not a statistically studied factor. The Livingston Road segment from Imperial Street to Immokalee Road (Collier County Link ID #51) is the monitored roadway link directly accessed by the project traffic. The 2022 peak hour, peak direction traffic volume for this roadway segment is 1,820 vehicles per hour (vph) as illustrated in the 2022 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR). The project is estimated to generate 93 peak hour, peak direction pass -by trips (Proposed Scenario 1 — highest traffic impact) which represent approximately 5% of the adjacent street traffic. Trip Generation Projections The estimated trip generation associated with the proposed development scenarios are illustrated in Tables 2A, 2B and 2C. Detailed calculations can be found in Appendix C: ITE Trip Generation Calculations. Collier County's Concurrency Management System is intended to ensure that there is adequate roadway capacity available to serve current and future development. Transportation Concurrency is a measure of the capacity of the roadway system to support the adopted level of service for vehicular traffic. As part of the Transportation Element, the County established minimum acceptable level of service standards on the existing highway system. For County facilities, the level of service standard is measured on a peak hour basis. In agreement with the Collier County TIS Guidelines and Procedures, significantly impacted roadways are identified based on the proposed project highest peak hour trip generation and consistent with the peak hour of the adjacent street traffic. Based on the information contained in Collier County 2022 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR), the peak hour for adjacent roadway network is PM. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 17 Packet Pg. 457 9.A.2.f Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 Table 2A Trip Generation — Proposed Scenario 1— Average Weekday Development Weekday AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ITE Land Use Size (2-way) Enter Exit 10 Total 26 Enter 42 Exit 41 Total 83 Strip Retail Plaza 11,000 square feet 599 16 Convenience Store/Gas Station 6,000 square feet 4,203 170 169 339 164 163 327 Total 4,802 186 179 365 206 204 410 Internal Capture 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 External Traffic 4,802 1,771 186 89 179 88 365 177 206 92 204 93 410 185 Pass -by Traffic Net External Traffic 3,031 1 97 91 1 188 114 1 111 1 225 Trip Generation — Proposed Scenario 2 — Average Weekday Development Weekday AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ITE Land Use Size (2-way) Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Mini -Warehouse 80,000 square feet 116 4 3 7 6 6 12 Convenience Store/Gas Station 6,000 square feet 4,203 170 169 339 164 163 327 Total 4,319 174 172 346 170 169 339 Internal Capture 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 External Traffic 4,319 174 172 346 170 169 339 Pass -by Traffic 1,681 2,638 85 89 85 87 170 176 82 88 82 87 164 175 Net External Traffic Table 2C Trip Generation — Proposed Scenario 3 — Average Weekday Development Weekday AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ITE Land Use Size 50,000 square feet (2-way) 3,376 Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Shopping Plaza (40-150k) 54 33 87 127 133 260 Total 3,376 54 33 87 127 133 260 Internal Capture 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 External Traffic 3,376 54 33 87 127 133 260 Pass -by Traffic S06 14 8 22 32 33 65 Net External Traffic 2,870 40 25 65 95 100 195 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g F 8 Packet Pg. 458 9.A.2.f Livingston Veterans — Commercial Planned Unit Development — Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 Based on the traffic data illustrated in Tables 2A, 2B and 2C, the proposed Scenario 1 development (Table 2A) provides the highest transportation impact and it is conservatively utilized for the purposes of this analysis. The surrounding roadway network concurrency analysis is analyzed based on projected PM peak hour net external traffic generated by the project (refer to Table 2A). The site access analysis is evaluated based on projected external traffic during the weekday AM and PM peak hour (proposed Scenario 1). Based on the data illustrated in Table 2A, the estimated PM peak hour directional trips (Enter and Exit traffic) are more intensive than the AM peak hour directional trips, and are conservatively utilized for the purposes of the site access analysis. Trip Distribution and Assignment The traffic generated by the development is assigned to the adjacent roadway network based on the knowledge of the area, the existing transportation network, the location of the subject project, engineering judgment and consistent with the transportation methodology (Appendix B). The site -generated trip distribution is shown in Table 3, Project Traffic Distribution for Peak Hour and is graphically depicted in Figure 2 — Project Distribution by Percentage and by PM Peak Hour. Table 3 Project Traffic Distribution for Peak Hour Distribution PM Peak Hr Project Roadway Link CC AUIR Roadway Link Location of Project Traffic Vol.* Link ID # Enter Exit Traffic Livingston Rd 51.0 Imperial St to Veterans Memorial Blvd 41% SB — 47 NB — 45 Livingston Rd 51.0 Veterans Memorial Blvd to Immokalee Rd 51% NB — 58 SB — 57 Veterans N/A East of Livingston Rd 8% WB — 9 EB — 9 Memorial Blvd** Note(s): * Peak hour, peak direction traffic volumes are underlined and bold to be used in Roadway Link Level of Service calculations; peak hour, peak direction per 2023 Annual Update and Inventory Report. **Not a Collier County monitored roadway. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 19 Packet Pg. 459 9.A.2.f Livingston Veterans — Commercial Planned Unit Development — Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 Figure 2 — Project Distribution by Percentage and by PM Peak Hour PROJECT TRIP l t q) DISTRIBUTION BY `= PERCENTAGE y Tforth ales Im ena€ Golf C�ubgrOddle Schoo 51% ri Co"Cuh Iuh=at Theran�� ► , r Quail Creek e � I �' ` .+ Village ndat�an �4 1 pf ��"�+ 5 •.'ngshare ake L2PI ya. Club I - � � l II `Eomm lty a IIII/��UU111 I + } wl ACRES BY 'A'- on lnrn, �p { 5� 7 1 F�,st'Wat[ Q Seed to Table��V , I, ap'12s Hasp l 1 1 I � 1 I—"rmm"ka�rrE—: _ immeud�me-- ° I' r SBic Club ■ Waimart Supercent'lt 1r✓ ql Target f }r G�IuseumMano Children ♦ Arrow! 1 rijl Naples, I N7A ler.r ` T NorlhCo[i Regal Par II a e 1 `¢uaiP ounry Clrkte'Y olfub® ❑� C c -'1 Tabs Park?- 1�:1..:: SB 47 9 PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION BY WB tJ PM PEAK HOUR t EB 9 •-r •^ y f ►� 4uaH'eek.® North Naples Cofntaryy Club Middle Schoo Im�erial Coifi Chb� f P-..:._ij ine-trang` Creeke ;i r Village o.ndatiun A s � r �4 ■ -,' Lngshare ake P, III Y.GotClub - I `Comm;lp ps �m n In p iswiLESBy ; =swattACCR,p e -Nv h Seed to Table ap�� F1aSpel I �� it. 1 — Immektleo a r /' Shins Club ■ Waimart Supercent" ■i �y (1I 9Ta'rget f ;fie Dana Children i r7� Naples a St® e4 A7useum of aple �� " �-�• _ r AnowH Cnu�,rryy��C�Ie,`J'', � Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 10 Packet Pg. 460 9.A.2.f Livingston Veterans — Commercial Planned Unit Development — Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 Background Traffic The existing traffic conditions are extracted from the 2023 AUIR. Average background traffic growth rates were estimated for the segments of the roadway network in the study area using the Collier County Traffic Impact Study Guidelines and Procedures recommendation of a minimum 2% growth rate, or the historical growth rate evaluated based on the annual peak hour, peak direction traffic volume (estimated from 2008 through 2023 as illustrated in AUIR), whichever is greater. Another way to derive the background traffic is to use the 2023 AUIR volume plus the trip bank volume. Table 4, Background Traffic without Project, illustrates the application of projected growth rates to generate the projected background (without project) peak hour peak direction traffic volume for the future horizon year 2028. Table 4 Background Traffic without Project (2023 - 2028) 2028 Projected 2028 Projected 2023 AUIR Projected Pk Hr, Peak Dir Pk Hr, Peak Dir cc Pk Hr, Pk Dir Traffic Background Background Roadway AUIR Roadway Link Background Annual Growth Traffic Volume Trip Traffic Volume Link Link Location Traffic Growth Factor w/out Project Bank w/out Project ID # Volume Rate (trips/hr) (tripsTrip (trips/hr) (%/yr)* Growth Factor** Bank*** Imperial St to Livingston 51.0 Veterans 1,600 2.92% 1.1548 1,848 203 1,803 Rd Memorial Blvd Livingston Veterans d 51.0 Memorial Blvd to 1,600 2.92% 1.1548 1,848 203 1,803 Immokalee Rd Note(s): * Annual Growth Rate — estimated for 2008-2023 peak hour, peak direction traffic volumes, or 2% minimum. ** Growth Factor = (1 + Annual Growth Rate)5. 2028 Projected Volume = 2023 AUIR Volume x Growth Factor. *** 2028 Projected Volume = 2023 AUIR Volume +Trip Bank. The projected 2028 Peak Hour — Peak Direction Background Traffic is the greater of the Growth Factor or Trip Bank calculation, which is underlined and bold as applicable. Existing and Future Roadway Network The existing roadway conditions are extracted from the 2023 Annual Update and Inventory Report. Roadway improvements that are currently under construction or are scheduled to be constructed within the five-year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) or Capital Improvement program (CIP) are considered to be committed improvements. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 11 Packet Pg. 461 9.A.2.f Livingston Veterans — Commercial Planned Unit Development — Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 As no such improvements were identified in the Collier County Five -Year Work Program (FY2024- FY2028), the evaluated roadway segments are anticipated to remain as such through project build -out (2028 planning horizon year). The existing and future roadway conditions are illustrated in Table 5, Existing and Future Roadway Conditions. Table 5 Existing and Future Roadway Conditions CC 2023 Peak 2028 Peak Roadway AUIR Roadway Link 2023 2023 Hr, Peak Dir 2028 2028 Hr, Peak Dir Roadway Standard Roadway Standard Link Link Location Capacity Capacity ID # Conditions LOS Volume Conditions LOS Volume Imperial St to Livingston 51.0 Veterans 6/4D D 3,000 (NB) 6/4D D 3,000 (NB) Rd Memorial Blvd Livingston Veterans 51.0 Memorial Blvd to 6/4D D 3,000 (NB) 6/4D D 3,000 (NB) Rd Immokalee Rd Note(s): 2U = 2-lane undivided roadway; 4D, 6D, 8D = 4-lane, 6-lane, 8-lane divided roadway, respectively; LOS = Level of Service. Veterans Memorial Boulevard Extension With potential impact to the study network, the adopted Collier County Five -Year Work Program depicts Veterans Memorial Boulevard Extension Phase 1 and Phase 2 as committed improvements. Phase 1 of this project will extend Veterans Memorial Boulevard from the intersection with Livingston Road to the east entrance of the newly planned high school. In Phase 2 the roadway will be further extended to Old US41 and potentially through to US41 (subject to a study by the Florida Department of Transportation). This will be a 4-lane divided urban roadway with traffic signals, concrete sidewalks and on -street bike lanes. Construction for Phase 1 commenced in January 2021. Part of this phase, the traffic signal at the intersection of Livingston Road and Veterans Memorial Blvd will be upgraded, and two new signalized intersections will be installed, one at Veterans Memorial Elementary school and one at the future high school. Phase 1 of this project was completed in 2023. Consistent with the approved construction plans for Phase 1, a two-lane median divided section is provided on the Veterans Memorial Boulevard segment located immediately east of its intersection with Livingston Road. The approved project phases and proposed improvements on Veterans Memorial Boulevard in the vicinity of proposed Livingston Veterans Commercial project are depicted in Appendix D: Veterans Memorial Blvd Improvements. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 12 Packet Pg. 462 9.A.2.f Livingston Veterans — Commercial Planned Unit Development — Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 Project Traffic Impacts - Roadway Link Analysis The Collier County Transportation Planning Services developed Level of Service (LOS) volumes for the roadway links impacted by the project, which were evaluated to determine the project impacts to the area roadway network in the future. In agreement with Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) requirements (LDC Section 6.02.02), a project is considered to have a significant and adverse impact if both the percentage volume capacity exceeds 2% of the capacity for the link directly accessed by the project and for the link adjacent to the link directly accessed by the project; 3% for other subsequent links and if the roadway is projected to operate below the adopted LOS standard. Based on these criteria, this project does not create any significant and adverse impacts to the area roadway network. None of the analyzed links are projected to operate below the adopted LOS standard with or without the project at 2028 future build -out conditions. Table 6, Roadway Link Level of Service illustrates the LOS impacts of the project on the area roadway network. Table 6 Roadway Link Level of Service (LOS) — With Project in the Year 2028 2028 Peak % 2028 Roadway Min LOS Min LOS CC Peak Hr, Link, Peak Hr, Peak Volume exceeded exceeded Roadway AUIR Roadway Link Dir Capacity Link Link Location Peak Dir Dir, Peak Hr Volume Impact without with ID # Capacity (Project Vol w/P*oject by Project? Project? Volume Added)* Yes/No Yes/No Project Imperial St to Livingston 51.0 Veterans Memorial 3,000 NB-45 1,893 0 1.5/ No No Rd (NB) Blvd Veterans Memorial Livingston 51.0 Blvd to Immokalee 3,000 NB-58 1,906 1.9% No No Rd (NB) Rd Note(s): *Refer to Table 3 from this report. **2028 Projected Volume = 2028 background (refer to Table 4) + Project Volume Added. As illustrated in Collier County LDC Chapter 6.02.02 — M. 2, once traffic from a development has been shown to be less than significant on any segment using Collier County TIS significance criterion, the development's impacts are not required to be analyzed further on any additional segments. Northwest Transportation Concurrency Management Area The analyzed roadway links are located within the Northwest Transportation Concurrency Management Area (TCMA). The TCMAs designation is provided in Policy 5.6 of the Transportation Element — Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP). Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 13 Packet Pg. 463 9.A.2.f Livingston Veterans — Commercial Planned Unit Development — Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 The Northwest TCMA is illustrated in GMP Transportation Element Map TR-5 as depicted in Appendix E: Transportation Element Map TR-5. In agreement with Policy 5.7 of the Transportation Element, the TCMA concurrency is measured on a system -wide basis such that each TCMA shall maintain 85% of its lane miles at or above the LOS standards. Based on the information contained in 2023 AUIR, the Northwest TCMA percent lane miles meeting standard is 94.0%. Refer to Appendix F: 2023 AUIR—TCMA Report— Northwest TCMA. As illustrated in the Policy 5.8, transportation mitigation may be required when the proposed development will impact either a constrained roadway link and/or a deficient roadway link within a TCMA as determined in the most current Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR), by more than a de minimis amount (more than 1% of the maximum service volume at the adopted LOS), yet continue to maintain the established percentage of lanes miles indicated in Policy 5.7 of the GMP Transportation Element. Based on the traffic projections illustrated Table 6, the impacted roadway network meets the Collier County transportation concurrency requirements. In addition, the TCMA concurrency (percent lane miles meeting standard) for the affected roadway segments is adequate. It is noted that no impact will be de minimis if it exceeds the adopted LOS standard of any affected designated hurricane evacuation routes within a TCMA. Any adverse impact to a hurricane evacuation route within a TCMA shall require a proportionate share congestion mitigation payment provided the remaining LOS requirements of the TCMA are maintained (GMP Transportation Element Policy 5.8.d). Livingston Road is a designated hurricane evacuation route and it is projected to perform within the adopted LOS standard. The Collier County hurricane evacuation routes are illustrated in GMP Transportation Element Map TR-7. Refer to Appendix G: Transportation Element Map TR-7. Site Access Analysis The project proposes one connection to Livingston Road and one access on Veterans Memorial Boulevard. In addition, a vehicular interconnect is proposed to the adjacent residential development to the east. For more details refer to Appendix A: Project Master Site Plan. Traffic Evaluation The site access is evaluated based on projected external traffic during the weekday AM and PM peak hour (proposed Scenario 1— highest traffic impact). The project estimated traffic is illustrated in Table 2A and Appendix C: ITE Trip Generation Calculations of this report. Based on the data illustrated in Table 2A, the estimated PM peak hour directional trips (Enter traffic 206 vph and Exit traffic 204 vph) are more intensive than the AM peak hour directional trips, and are conservatively utilized for the purposes of the site access analysis. Access Management Policy Collier County's roadway network is comprised of State, County, City and privately maintained roadways. Roadways are generally classified as Arterial, Collector, or Local. Access management is the Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 14 Packet Pg. 464 9.A.2.f Livingston Veterans — Commercial Planned Unit Development — Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 design of access between roadways and land development. It promotes the efficient and safe movement of people and goods by reducing conflicts on the roadway system. The latest adopted Access Management Policy for Collier County is depicted in Resolution No. 13-257, as amended. The Livingston Road segment from Immokalee Road to Imperial Street (Collier County 2022 AUIR ID #51.0) and the Veterans Memorial Boulevard segment located east of Livingston Road are the roadway facilities accessed directly by the project. As illustrated in the Collier County Capital Improvement Element — Transportation Element Map TR - 3 (Federal Functional Classification/Urban Boundaries — Collier County), the subject Livingston Road segment is designated as an arterial facility. Refer to Appendix H: Transportation Element Map TR - 3. The Livingston Road (CR 881) segment from Immokalee Road to Imperial Street is currently a north - south 6-lane divided roadway under Collier County jurisdiction and has a posted legal speed of 45 mph in the vicinity of the project. A review of Collier County Access Management Policy guidelines shows that for a Class 3 roadway, the established access management criteria are as follow: 660 feet minimum connection spacing; 660 feet directional median opening; 1,320 feet full median opening; and 2,640 feet (0.5 mi) signal spacing. Refer to Appendix I: Access Management Policy — Tablel. Based on our review of the proposed connection spacing, this access exceeds the adopted minimum connection spacing standards for a Class 3 roadway. As such, the proposed access on Livingston Road meets the adopted standards for a right-in/right-out connection. In addition, a directional median opening meets or exceeds the adopted directional median opening spacing standards for a Class 3 roadway. As such, a directional median opening may be allowed at this location. The Veterans Memorial Boulevard segment located east of its intersection with Livingston Road is planned as a 2-lane divided roadway under Collier County jurisdiction and has a posted legal speed of 35 mph in the vicinity of the project. The established access management criteria for a Class 5 facility are as follow: 220 feet minimum connection spacing; 440 feet directional median opening; 660 feet full median opening; and 1,320 feet (0.25 mi) signal spacing. Refer to Appendix I. Based on our review of the proposed connection spacing, the proposed access on Veterans memorial Boulevard meets the adopted standards for a right-in/right-out connection. Turn lane warrants Required turn lane improvements are considered site related. As illustrated in the Collier County Construction Standards Handbook for Work within the Right -Of -Way, Section III, if existing County ROW is utilized for these improvements, compensating ROW must be provided. The project accesses are evaluated for turn lane warrants based on the Collier County Construction Standards Handbook: (a) two-lane roadways — 40vph for right -turn lane/20vph for left -turn lane; (b) Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 15 Packet Pg. 465 9.A.2.f Livingston Veterans — Commercial Planned Unit Development — Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 multi -lane divided roadways — right -turn lanes shall always be provided; and (c) when new median openings are permitted, they shall always include left -turn lanes. The assignment of the PM peak hour trips anticipated at the proposed site access locations is depicted in Appendix J: Turning Movements Exhibits. A dedicated northbound right -turn lane and an exclusive southbound left -turn lane (provided a directional median opening is permitted) are warranted at the Livingston Road access location based on the multi -lane roadway criterion. The left -in directional median opening on Livingston Road will be evaluated for denial or approval at the time of site development permitting. In addition, a dedicated eastbound right -turn lane is warranted at the proposed access located on Veterans Memorial Boulevard as the projected traffic exceeds the right -turn threshold volume criterion (refer to Appendix J). A detailed evaluation of applicable access points will be performed at the time of site development permitting/platting to determine traffic operational requirements, as more accurate parameters will be made available. Improvement Analysis The concurrency analysis determined that the proposed project is not a significant and adverse traffic generator for the roadway network at this location. There is adequate and sufficient roadway capacity to accommodate the proposed development without adversely affecting adjacent roadway network level of service. Based upon the results of the turn lane analysis performed within this report, turn lane improvements are warranted at the proposed project access locations. Mitigation of Impact The developer proposes to pay the appropriate Collier County Road Impact Fee as building permits are issued for the project. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 16 Packet Pg. 466 9.A.2.f Livingston Veterans — Commercial Planned Unit Development — Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 Appendix A: Project Master Site Plan Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P - 1 17 Packet Pg. 467 9.A.2.f Livingston Veterans — Commercial Planned Unit Development — Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 VETERANS MEMORIAL PARKWAY (PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY) RIGHT IN / RIGHT OUT ACCESS POINT _ T__15'TYPE'D' ! 0 LANDSCAPE BUFFER Q p III VEH ICU LAR/PEDEST R IAN / INTER -CONNECT Z c� caj Q Q } 4 I— Q C7> z ° z �w z�w p= �a O� QUO N� 0 J ❑I > ~LU q J z 10 a },' � 15'TYPE'D' ILANDSCAPE BUFFER J POTENTIAL INTERNAL Z _a z W Q LOT LINE Q U N Z W Qco LU 45` TYPE 'B' LANDSCAPE BUFFER LEGEND X❑ -DEVIATION b C COMMERCIAL a ® - WATER 15TYPE'B' MANAGEMENT LANDSCAPE BUFFER INTERNAL ZONING: RPUD ACCESS POINT LAND USE: MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT 000 EXTERNAL ACCESS POINT Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g F 1 18 Packet Pg. 468 9.A.2.f Livingston Veterans — Commercial Planned Unit Development — Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 Appendix B: Initial Meeting Checklist (Methodology Meeting) Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 19 Packet Pg. 469 9.A.2.f Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 INT,ri.1i, tINE'rINGi,Hkx *I.,Is'r Suggestion: Use this Appendix as a workshect to ensure that no important elements are overlrxtked. ('russ out the items that do not apply, or NIA (not applicable). Dale: December 8, 2022 Time: 1�1 Location: Ni A 'G is rtnai l People Attenduta: Name, Organization, and •Telephone Numbers 1) Michael Sa«ryar, Collier County Growth Management Division 2) Norman Trebilcock. TCS 3) Cinrian Malaescu,'FCS Study Preparer: Preparer's Name and 'Title: Norman Trebilcock, AMP. PTOE, PE Organization: Trobilcock Consulting Solution,,, PA Address & Telephone Number: 2800 Davis Roulovard, Suite 200, Naples, Fl, 34104: ph 239-566-9551 Reri$.AV erts): Reviewer's Name & Titic: Michael Sawyer, Proicet Manap-or Organization: _CoIIier County Transporlation Planning Department Telephone Number: 239-252-2926 Applicant: ikpplicant's Name: Peninsula Eneincerine Address: 2600 Golden Gate Parkway_ Naples. Fl 34105 Telephone Number: 239-403-6700 Proposed Development: Name: Livingston Veterans —CPUD Rezone Location: Southeast quadrant of the intersection of Livingston Road (CR 881) :utd Veterans Memorial Boulevard, in Naples refer to File. 1 Land Use Type: Commercial TTE Code #: Varic s — per IT - Trin Generation Manual f TGNI , 1 iu' Edition Description: 'rite subject prolecl is currently vacant land. 11te requegl is to rezone the property from C-1 and A to C11Ul) to allow C-1 comin orcia] uses. 'I lie proposed intensitN is 50,(X)Osf of commercial and 10 0, 000 sf sell -storage, For tra111C analysis pumoses, the project proposes 3 development concepts: - Up to 6,000 sf gas station with 12 fueling stations {fs) and a car crash and 11.000 srcommercial center: or - Up to 6,000 sr p_as station with 12 fs and a car wash and 80,000 sr indoor so:Tf- storage Page 1 of 6 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 20 Packet Pg. 470 9.A.2.f Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 - Up to 50,000 sf Shopping Center. The proiect proposes one connection on Livingston Road (CR 881) and one access on Veterans Memorial Boulevard - Figure 1— Project Location Map . j 1'Aead'4+est Ear r y �- S T. Park Gd }111 y 4i PROJECT xnooi c n tj I► wu.tOU s ov Q i � uwean�,�N,pie.�r I seratin�le��# �cau�p ci�e`- { �rowi I; Np9n C: FYI z Existing: C1 and Comprehensive plan recommendation: NIA Requested approval for development Findings of the Preliminary Study: Studvtvpe: Since estimated net new proiect traffic is greater than 100 two-wav peak hour trips, this study Qualifies for a Maior TIS. The TIS will evaluate the highest and best use scenario for the site: Scenario 1 — 6,000sf/12 fs gas station with car wash and 11,000sf shopping center Scenario 2 — 6,000sf/12 fs gas station with car wash and 80,000 indoor self storage facili Scenario 3 — 50,000 sf shopping center The traffic report will determine a trip cap associated with the proposed highest and best Use. The TIS will be consistent with Collier County TIS Guidelines and Procedures. Page 2 of 6 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 21 Packet Pg. 471 Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 9.A.2.f Trip Generation — FM Trip Generation Nhtnual (TCM), I I"' Edition: internal capture and pass -by rates are considered consistent with I' E and CC Tis Guidelines. Internal Caphne — conservatively, no internal capture i5 considered, Pass -by Reduction per ITT turd CC 'ITS Guidelines - Shopping Cent.'r Dailv 15%; :111i and PM — 251o: Gas Station - Daily 40%..- .M and P-M — 50%: maxjtntttn 10% of adiacent street traffic (.-At`IR 2022 — Livingston Rd segment adjacent to project. Peak hour peak direction •olume = 1,820 vpli; 10" r, maxirtwnt = 182 vph). Gas Station — Trip t encration comparison behire,::: eonneniencc »>arkel sgaare_ f❑otaAe and nutnbcr of fneltng stations. Car Wash — Consistent with ete teraliv accepted practice. tratiic generated by the Car Wash land use is considered incidental to die proposed Gas Station land use. Roadway concurrency analysis based on estimated net external PM peak hour traffic. Tltc proposed devclontnent is situated within the Countv's designated Northwest Transportation Concurrancy Managetnent Area (TCAIA). Ilia TCNIA designation is provided in Policy 5.6 of the Transportation Element — Collier County Growth )Management Plan (CIMP). Site Access — Evaluate access restrictions based on current Access Management Policy. Study Type: ornol net ineTcase, operational study) Small Scale rrIS ❑ Minorn5 ❑ Major "11S Study Area: Boundaries: Adjacent streets— Livingston Rd: Veterans Memorial Blyd Additional intersections to be analvLed: N A Build Out Year: 2027 Planning Horizon Year: 2027 Analysis Time Period(s): LOS - Ply[ Peak Hour: Access — ANI. M Peak Hour Future Off -Site Developments: NIA Source or Trip Ciencration Rates: IT'F Dil) Creneratiorl Nfanual CI'GiGi), I ]`h Edition Reductions in Trip Generation Rates: None: NIA Pass -by trips: Based on H'F and Collier Cotanty TIS Guidelines Internal trips (MPUD): Based on ITE and Collier County TIS Guidelines Transit use: NIA Other: N/A Hoiizon Year Roadww. Net3,%vtrl: I i i i p rov ements: 2027 Page 3 of 6 M IL U M c L d m C O IM C J N N M 0 0 0 N N O N J a ti le 00 ti N c O .y N N N c M v Q tZ Q LU C d E z V M r� r� Q c d E t v M Q Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 22 Packet Pg. 472 Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 9.A.2.f MethodoloZy & Assumptions: Non -site traffic estimates: Collier County traffic counts and 2022 AUIR Site -trip generation: OTISS — ITE TGM, 11t' Edition Trip distribution method Engineer's Estimate —refer to Figure 2 Traffic assignment method: Engineer's Estimate Traffic growth rate: historical growth rate or 2%minimum Turning Movement Assignment: Engineer's Estimate — 51 % at Livingston Rd access and 45% at Veterans Memorial Blvd access, 4% - via interconnect with Allura residential development. Figure 2— Project Trip Distribution by Percentage f - '• del, ' �_.9 .❑� 410% ® PROJECT TRIP I .. DISTRIBUTION BY PERCENTAGE -- 416 4111! + �uT i7 YaF'P� hit nal Golf` I ddie's:noo 51°k 10 !_ LaI?[ByaGtiClubY �J WILLLOOUGHBY C{i�Ior�psPna seed lu Te sH I s Club Wad � ' r� IISar+o cnu� oseum af Col Global the hand � ►� � � i7uau c dcrlpa ViElagef eek f 1 � L gsl,rPe he 4 FLm an loll NapkS It art Lpercenter MTa'rgel , Anawf Page 4 of 6 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 23 Packet Pg. 473 9.A.2.f Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 Special Features: (from preliminary study or prior e Accidents locations: N/A Sight distance: NIA Queuing: N/A Access location & configuration: NIA Traffic control: MUTCD Signal system location & progression needs: NIA On -site parking needs: N/A Data Sources: CC 2022 AUIR: most current CC Trai Base maps: N/A Prior study reports: N/A Access policy and jurisdiction: N/A Review process: N/A Requirements: N/A Miscellaneous: NIA Small Scale Study — No Fee Minor Study - $750.00 Major Study - $1,500.00 X Methodology Fee $500 X Includes 0 intersections Additional Intersections - $500.00 each All fees will be agreed to during the Methodology meeting a. our sign -off on the appli SIGNATURES Normaw TrebU ocK,, Study Preparer Norman Trebilcock Reviewer(s ) Applicant Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 24 Packet Pg. 474 9.A.2.f Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 Collier County Traffic Impact Study Review Fee Schedule Fees will be paid incrementally as the development proceeds: Methodology Review, Analysis Rvvicw, and Suftic:icnev Reviews. Fees for additional meetings or othrx optional services arc: also provided below. Mel hodoloey Re►iiew - $500 Fee Methodology Review includes review of a submitted methodology statement, including review of submitted trip generation estimatc(s), distribution, assignment. and review of a "Small Scale Study" determination, written approval/comments on a proposed methodology statement, and written confirmation of a re submitted, amended methodology statement, and one meeting in Coll ier County, ifnecded. "Small Scale Sludy" Review - No Additional Fee [Includes one suMdencv review} Upon approval of the methodology review. the applicant may submit the sludy. The review includes: a concurrency determination, site access inspection and confirmation of the study compliance with trip generation. distribution and maximum threshold compliance. "Alin or Study Review" - S750 Fee (Includes one sufficiency review) Review of the submitted traffic analysis includes: optional field visit to site, eunfnmation of trip generation, distribution, and assignment, coneurrency determination, confirmation of committed improvements, review of traffic volume data coliccled/assembled, review of off -site improvements within the right -of way, review of site access and circulation, and preparation and review of "sufficiency" comments/questions. "Maior Studs Review" - $1,5W Fee (Includes two intersection analysis and two Sufficiency reviews Review of the submitted traffic analysis includes: field visit to site, confirmation of trip generation. special trip generation and/or trip length study, distribution and assignment. concunrcncy determination, confirmation of committed improvements, review of traffic volume data coHcctedlassem6led, review of traffic growth analysis, rmiew of off -site roadway operations and capacity analysis, mview of site access and circulation neighborhood traffic intrusion issues, any necessary improvement proposals and associated cost estimates, and preparation and review of up to two rounds of `sufficiency" comments/questions and/or recommended conditions of approval, "Additional intersection Review" - $500 Fee The review of additional intersections strait include the same parameters as out]ined in the "Major Study Review" and shall apply to each intersection above the first two intersections included in the " NUjor Study Review" "Additiana] Sofficienry Reviews" - $_500 Fee Additional sufficiency reviews beyond those initially included in the appropriate study shall require the additional Fee prior to the completion of the review. Page 6 of 6 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 25 Packet Pg. 475 9.A.2.f Livingston Veterans — Commercial Planned Unit Development — Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 Appendix C: ITE Trip Generation Calculations Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 26 Packet Pg. 476 9.A.2.f Livingston Veterans -Commercial Planned Unit Development -Traffic Impact Statement -January 2024 ITE TGM 11" Edition — Land Use Descriptions Land Use: 151 Mini -Warehouse Description A mini -warehouse is a building in which a number of storage units or vaults are rented for the storage of goods. They are typically referred to as "self -storage" facilities. Each unit is physically separated from other units, and access is usually provided through an overhead door or other common access point. Additional Data The technical appendices provide supporting information on time -of -day distributions for this land use. The appendices can be accessed through either the ITETripGen web Opp or the trip generation resource page on the ITE websile[https.11www:ite:or�ltechnical:resvurceslivpicslt�i�7: and.parkmg; enerationl�. The sites were surveyed in the 198Ds, the 199as, the 2000s, and the 2D1 Us in California, Colorado, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, Texas, and Utah. Source Numbers 212, 403, 551, 568, 642, 708, 724, 850, 868, 876,1024, 1 D35 RI ' General UrWr/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 000-399) 109 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 27 Packet Pg. 477 9.A.2.f Livingston Veterans - Commercial Planned Unit Development - Traffic Impact Statement -January 2024 Land Use: 821 Shopping Plaza (40-150k) Description A shopping plaza is an integrated group of commercial establishments that is planned, developed, owned, and managed as a unit. Each study site in this land use has between 40,000 and 150,000 square feet of gross leasable area (GLA). The term "plaza" in the land use name rather than "center" is simply a means of distinction between the different shopping center size ranges. Various other names are commonly used to categorize a shopping plaza within this size range, depending on its specific size and tenants, such as neighborhood center, community center, and fashion center. Its major tenant is often a supermarket but many sites are anchored by home improvement, discount, or other stores. A shopping plaza typically contains more than retail merchandising facilities. Office space, a movie theater, restaurants, a post office, banks, a health club, and recreational facilities are common tenants. A shopping plaza is almost always open-air and the GLA is the same as the gross floor area of the building, The 150,000 square feet GLA threshold value between shopping plaza and shopping center (Land Use 820) is based on an examination of trip generation data. For a shopping plaza that is smaller than the threshold value, the presence or absence of a supermarket within the plaza has a measurable effect on site trip generation. For a shopping center that is larger than the threshold value, the trips generated by its other major tenants mask any effects of the presence or absence of an on -site supermarket. The 40,000 square feet GFA threshold between shopping plaza and strip retail plaza (Land Use 822) was selected based on an examination of the overall shopping center/plaza database. No shopping plaza with a supermarket as its anchor is smaller than 40,000 square feet GLA. Shopping center (�-i 50k) (Land Use 820), strip retail plaza (<40k) (Land Use 822), and factory outlet center (Land Use 823) are related uses. Land Use Subcategory The presence or absence of a supermarket in a shopping plaza has been determined to have a measurable effect on site trip generation. Therefore, data are presented for two subcategories for this land use: sites with a supermarket anchor and sites without a supermarket. Additional Data Tile technical appendices provide supporting information on time -of -day distributions for this land use. The appendices can be accessed through either the ITETripGen web app or the trip generation resource page on the ITE webs ite (httpsWwww.ite.org/technical-resourcesltopicsltrip- ..................................................................................... a.nd-....pa .rki...nq,-fi....e neratio nl). ........................ General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 800-999) 197 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 28 Packet Pg. 478 Livingston Veterans -Commercial Planned Unit Development -Traffic Impact Statement -January 2024 9.A.2.f The sites were surveyed in the 1980s, the 1990s, the 2000s, and the 2010s in Alberta (CAN), British Columbia (CAN), California, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, Ontario (CAN), Oregon, Pennsylvania, South ❑akota, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, and Wisconsin. Source Numbers 105, 110, 156, 159, 186, 198, 204, 211, 213, 239, 259, 260, 295, 301, 304, 305, 307. 317, 319, 358, 376, 390, 400, 404, 437, 444, 446, 507, 580, 598, 658, 728, 908, 926, 944, 946, 960, 973, 974, 1004, 1009, 1025, 1069 198 Trip Generation Manual 111h Editlon • Volume 5 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 129 Packet Pg. 479 Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 9.A.2.f Land Use: 822 Strip Retail Plaza (<40k) Description A strip retail plaza is an integrated group of commercial establishments that is planned, developed, owned, and managed as a unit. Each study site in this land use has less than 40,000 square feet of gross leasable area (GLA). Because a strip retail plaza is open -air, the GLA is the same as the gross floor area of the building. The 40,000 square Feet GFA threshold between strip retail plaza and shopping plaza (Land Use 821) was selected based on an examination of the overall shopping center/plaza database. No shopping plaza with a supermarket as its anchor is smaller than 40,000 square feet GLA. Shopping center (>150k) (Land use 82D), shopping plaza (40-150k) (Land Use 821), and factory outlet center (Land Use 823) are related uses - Additional Data The technical appendices provide supporting information on time -of -day distributions for this land use. The appendices can be accessed through either the ITETripGen web app or the trip generation resource page on the ITE website (https://www.ite.or�ltechnical-resources/topics/trip- .................................................................................. and parkin�_�eneration�). The sites were surveyed in the 1980s, the 199Os, the 2000s, and the 201 Os in Alberta (CAN), California, Delaware, Florida, New Jersey, Ontario (CAN), South Dakota, Vermont, Washington, and Wisconsin. Source Numbers 304, 358, 423, 428, 437, 507, 715, 728, 936, 960, 961, 974, 1009 228 Trip Generation Manual 1111h Editlon • Volume 5 Mr- Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 130 Packet Pg. 480 Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 9.A.2.f Land Use: 945 Convenience Store/Gas Station Description A convenience store/gas station is a facility with a co -located convenience store and gas station. The convenience store sells grocery and other everyday items that a person may need or want as a matter of convenience. The gas station sells automotive fuels such as gasoline and diesel. A convenience store/gas station is typically located along a major thoroughfare to optimize motorist convenience. Extended hours of operation (with many open 24 hours, 7 days a week) are common at these facilities. The convenience store product mix typically includes pre -packaged grocery items, beverages, dairy products, snack foods, confectionary, tobacco products, over-the-counter drugs, and toiletries. A convenience store may sell alcohol, often limited to beer and wine. Coffee and pre - made sandwiches are also commonly sold at a convenience store. Made -to -order food orders are sometimes offered. Some stores offer limited seating. The sites in this land use include both self -pump and attendant -pumped fueling positions and both pre -pay and post -pay operations. Convenience store (Land Use 851), gasolinelservice station (Land Use 944), and truck stop (Land Use 950) are related uses. Land Use Subcategory Multiple subcategories were added to this land use to allow for multi -variable evaluation of sites with single -variable data plots. All study sites are assigned to one of three subcategories, based on the number of vehicle fueling positions (VFP) at the site: between 2 and 8 VFP, between 9 and 15 VFP, and between 16 and 24 VFP. For each VFP range subcategory, data plots are presented with GFA as the independent variable for all time periods and trip types for which data are available. The use of both GFA and VFP (as the independent variable and land use subcategory, respectively) provides a significant improvement in the reliability of a trip generation estimate when compared to the single -variable data plots in prior editions of Trip Generation Manual. Further, the study sites were also assigned to one of three other subcategories, based on the gross floor area (GFA) of the convenience store at the site: between 2,000 and 4,000 square feet, between 4,000 and 5,500 square feet, and between 5,500 and 10,000 square feet. For each GFA subcategory range, data plots are presented with VFP as the independent variable for all time periods and trip types for which data are available. The use of both VFP and GFA (as the independent variable and land use subcategory, respectively) provides a significant improvement in the reliability of a trip generation estimate when compared to the single -variable data plots in prior editions of Trip Generation Manual. 964 Trip Generation Manual 111h Editlon • Volume 5 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Pa gr, 131 Packet Pg. 481 9.A.2.f Livingston Veterans -Commercial Planned Unit Development -Traffic Impact Statement -January 2024 When analyzing the convenience store/gas station land use with each combination of GFA and VFP values as described above, the two sets of data plots will produce two estimates of site - generated trips. Both values can be considered when determining a site trip generation estimate. Data plots are also provided for three additional independent variables: AM peak hour traffic on adjacent street, PM peak hour traffic on adjacent street, and employees- These independent variables are intended to be analyzed as single independent variables and do not have sub- categories associated with them. Within the data plots and within the ITETripGen web app, these plots are found under the land use subcategory "none." Additional Data ITE recognizes there are existing convenience store gas station sites throughout North America that are larger than the sites presented in the data plots. However, the ITE database does not include any site with more than 24 VFP or any site with gross floor area greater than 10,000 square feet. Submission of trip generation data for larger sites Is encouraged. The technical appendices provide supporting information on time -of -day distributions for this land use. The appendices can be accessed through either the ITETrip Gen web app or the trip generation resource page on the ITE website (htt s:llwww.ite.or (technical-resources/ta ics/trip- a nd. pa rking _ge aeration/). The sites were surveyed in the 1980s, the 1990s, the 2000s, and the 2010s in Alberta (CAN), Arkansas, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Washington, and Wisconsin. Source Numbers 221, 245, 274, 288, 300, 340, 350, 351, 352, 355, 359, 385, 440, 617, 718, 810, 813, 844, 850, 853, 864, 865, 867, 869, 882, 883, 888, 904, 926, 927. 936, 938, 954, 960, 962, 977, 1004, 1024. 1025, 1027, 1052 i= General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 800-999) 865 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a p a 1 32 Packet Pg. 482 9.A.2.f Livingston Veterans — Commercial Planned Unit Development — Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 Gas Station —Trip Generation Comparison Project Name: Veterans Commercial - Gas Station Comparison No: Date: 11124=21 City: StatelProvince: ZiPlPostal Code: Country: Client Name: Analyst's Name: Edition: Trip Generation Manual, 11th Ed DAILY AM PEAK HOI PM PEAK HOUR Slzl_ Entry Exit Entry Exit Entry Exit 945 • Conver lance Store/Gas Station • GFA (5.5-10k) (General Urban/Suburban) 12 M 2875 2074 190 189 162 161 Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 Intemal 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -by 0 0 0 0 0 0 Non -pass -by 2075 2074 190 189 162 161 945 - Convenience StorelGas Station -1 - VFP (9.15) (General Urban/Suburban) 6 f4 2102 2101 170 169 164 163 Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 Internal 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -by 0 0 0 0 0 0 Non -pass -by 1 1 2102 12101 1170 169 1 164 1 163 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 33 c to L 0 N i� C J tV N M O Q O tV N O N J a ti Iq 00 t*_ 04 Packet Pg. 483 Livingston Veterans - Commercial Planned Unit Development - Traffic Impact Statement -January 2024 9.A.2.f PERIOD SETTING Analysis Name., Daily Project Name: Veterans Commercial - Gas No: Station Comparison Date: 11/2412021 City: StatelProvince: ZiplPostal Code: Country: Client Name: Analyst's Name: Edition: Land Use Independent Size Time Period Method Variable 945 - Convenience Vehicle Fueling 12 Weekday Average Store/Gas Station - Positions 345.75 GFA (5.5-10k) (General UrbanlSuburban) 945 - Convenience 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 6 Weekday Average Store/Gas Station - 1 - 700,43 VFP (9-15) (General Urban/Suburban) (0) indicates small sample size, use carefully. PERIOD SETTING Analysis Name: AM Peak Hour Project Name: Veterans Commercial - Gas No: Station Comparison Date: 11/24/2021 City: State/Province: Zip/Postal Code: Country: Client Name: Analyst's Name: Edition: Land Use Independent Size Time Period Method Variable 945 - Convenience Vehicle Fueling 12 Weekday, Peak Average Store/Gas Station - Positions Hour of Adjacent 31.6 GFA (5.5-10k) Street Traffic, (General One Hour Urban/Suburban) Between 7 and 9 a.m. 945 - Convenience 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 6 Weekday, Peak Average Store/Gas Station - 1 - Hour of Adjacent 56.52 VFP (9-15) (General Street Traffic, Urban/Suburban) One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. Trip Generation Manual, 11th Ed Entry Exit Total 2075(0) 2074(0) 4149(0) 50% 50% 2102 2101 4203 50% 50% Trip Generation Manual, 11th Ed Entry Exit Total 190 189 379 50% 50% 170 169 339 50% 50% Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 134 Packet Pg. 484 Livingston Veterans — Commercial Planned Unit Development — Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 9.A.2.f Analysis Name: Project Name: Date: State/Province., Country: Analyst's Name: PERIOD SETTING PM Peak Hour Veterans Commercial - Gas No: Station Comparison 11/24/2021 City: Zip/Postal Code: Client Name: Edition: Trip Generation Manual, I Ith Ed Land Use Independent Size Time Period Method Variable 945 -Convenience Vehicle Fueling 12 Weekday, Peak Average Store/Gas Station - Positions Hour of Adjacent 26.9 GFA (5.5-10k) Street Traffic, (General One Hour Urban/Suburban) Between 4 and 6 p.m. 945 - Convenience 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 6 Weekday, Peak Average Store/Gas Station - 1 - Hour of Adjacent 54.52 VFP (9-15) (General Street Traffic, Urban/Suburban) One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Entry Exit Total 162 161 323 50% 50% 164 163 327 50% 50% Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 135 Packet Pg. 485 9.A.2.f Livingston Veterans — Commercial Planned Unit Development — Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 Development Scenario 1— Trip Generation Proj=4 Nams: Veterans Commercial - Scenario 1 No: Data; 11/2412021 City: StatNProvincs: 21plPostat Code: Country: Client Name: Analyst's Name: Edition: Trip Generation Manuel, itth Ed AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR Entry Exit Entry Exit Entry Exit 822 - Strip Retell Plaza (&it;40k) (General UrbaNSuburban) 11 (1) 300 299 16 I 10 42 41 Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 Intemal 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -by 45 45 4 3 10 11 Nan -pass -by 255 254 12 7 32 30 945 - Convenience StorelGas Station - VFP (9-15) (General UrbaNSuburban) 50 2102 2101 170 169 164 163 Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 Internal 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -by B41 840 85 85 82 82 Non -pass -by 1261 1261 85 84 82 81 Total 2402 2400 186 179 206 204 Total Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Internal 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Pass -by 886 855 89 88 ti2 93 Total Non -pass -by 1516 1515 97 91 114 111 (1) 1000 Sq- Ft. GLA (2) 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA Traebilcack C-Dnsulting Saluti-Dnsr PA P P 36 c to L C O r N a� c J N N M O O O N N O tV J a I` Iq 00 N Packet Pg. 486 Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 9.A.2.f E Analysis Name Project Name Date: State/Province: Country: Analyst's Name: PERIOD SETTING Daily Veterans Commercial - No Scenario 1 1112412021 City: Zip/Postal Code: Client Name: Edition: Land Use independent Size Time Period Method Variable 822 - Strip Retail Plaza 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA 11 Weekday Average (&lt;40k) (General 54.45 Urban/Suburban) 945 - Convenience 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 6 Weekday Average Store/Gas Station - 700.43 VFP (9-15) (General Urban/Suburban) (0) indicates small sample size, use carefully TRAFFIC REDUCTIONS Land Use Entry Reduction 822 - Strip Retail Plaza (&lt;40k) 0 945 - Convenience Store/Gas Station 0 % Trip Generation Manual, 11th Ed Entry Exit Total 30010I 299(0) 59910i 50% 50% 2102 2101 4203 50% 50% Adjusted Entry Exit Reduction Adjusted Exit 300 0 % 299 2102 0 % 2101 INTERNAL TRIPS 822 - Strip Retail Plaza (&lt;40k) Exit 299 Demand Exit: 0 % (0) Balanced: 0 Entry 300 Demand Entry: 0 % (0) Balanced: 0 822 - Strip Retail Plaza (&lt;40k) Internal Trips Total Trips 945 . Convenience StorelGas Station Entry 300 (100%) 0 (0%) Exit 299 (100%) 0 (0%) 945 - Convenience Store/Gas Station Demand Entry: 0 % (0) Entry 2102 Demand Exit: 0 % (0) Exit 2101 Total External Trips 0 (0%) 300 (100%) 0 (0%) 299 (100%) Total 599 (100%) 0 (0%) I 0 (0%) 599 (100%) 945 - Convenience StorelGas Station Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a a F 1 37 Packet Pg. 487 9.A.2.f Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 Total Trips Entry 2102 (100%) Exit 2101 (100%) Intemal Trips 622 - Strip Retail Plaza Total (&amP:R:40k) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) I External Trips 102 (100%) 2101 (100%) Total 4203 (100%) 10 (0%) 0 (0%) 4203 (100%) F EXTERNAL TRIPS Land Use Extemai Trips Pass -by% Pass -by Trips Non -pass -by Trips 822 - Strip Retail Plaza (&lt;40k) 599 15 90 509 945 - Convenience Store/Gas Station 4203 40 1681 2522 ITE DEVIATION DETAILS Weekday Landuse No deviations from ITE. Methods No deviations from ITE. External Trips 822 - Strip Retail Plaza (&lt;40k) (General Urban/Suburban) ITE does not recommend a particular pass -by% for this case. 945 - Convenience StorelGas Station - VFP (9-15) (General Urban/Suburban) ITE does not recommend a particular pass -by% for this case. ESUMMARY Total Entering 2402 Total Exiting 2400 Total Entering Reduction 0 Total Exiting Reduction 0 Total Entering Intemal Capture Reduction 0 Total Exiting Intemal Capture Reduction 0 Total Entering Pass -by Reduction 886 Total Exiting Pass -by Reduction 885 Total Entering Non -Pass -by Trips 1516 Total Exiting Non -Pass -by Trips 1515 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g a 1 38 Packet Pg. 488 9.A.2.f Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 PERIOD SETTING Analysis Name; AM Peak Hour Project Name: Veterans Commercial - No: Scenario Date: 11/24/2021 City: StatefProvince: Zip/Postal Code: Country: Client Name: Analyst's Name: Edition: Trip Generation Manual, 11th Ed Land Use Independent Size Time Period Method Entry Exit Total Variable 822 - Strip Retail Plaza 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA 11 Weekday, Peak Average 16(0) 10(0) 26(0) (&lt;40k) (General Hour of Adjacent 2.36 62% 38% Urban/Suburban) Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. 945 - Convenience 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 6 Weekday, Peak Average 170 169 339 StorelGas Station • Hour of Adjacent 56.52 50% 50% VFP (9-15) (General Street Traffic, Urban/Suburban) One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. (0) indicates small sample size, use carefully. TRAFFIC REDUCTIONS Land Use Entry Reduction Adjusted Entry Exit Reduction Adjusted Exit 822 - Strip Retail Plaza (&lt;40k) 0 % 16 0 % 10 945 - Convenience Store/Gas Station 0 % 170 0 % 169 INTERNAL TRIPS 822 - Strip Retail Plaza (&lt;40k) 945 - Convenience Store/Gas Station Exit 10 Demand Exit: 0 % (0) Balanced: Demand Entry: 0 % (0) Entry 170 Entry 16 Demand Entry: 0 % (0) Balanced: Demand Exit: 0 % (0) Exit 169 822 - Strip Retail Plaza (&lt;40k) Internal Trlps Total Trips 945 - Convenience Total External Trips Store/Gas Station Entry 16 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 16 (100%) Exit 10 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 10 (100%) Total 26 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 26 (100%) Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 39 Packet Pg. 489 9.A.2.f Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 945 - Convenience StorafGas Station Irrtemal Trips Total Trips 822_ Strip Retail Plaza Total External Trips 18, p;lt;40k) Entry 170 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 170 (100%) Exit 169 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 169 (100%) Total 339 (100%) 10 (0%) 0 (m) 339 (100%) Land Use 822 - Strip Retail Plaza (&It;40k) 945 - Convenience Store/Gas Station EXTERNAL TRIPS External Trips Pass -by% 26 25 339 50 ITE DEVIATION DETAILS Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m Landuse No deviations from ITE. Methods No deviations from ITE. Pass -by Trips Non -pass -by Trips 7 19 170 169 External Trips 822 - Strip Retail Plaza (&lt40k) (General Urban/Suburban) ITE does not recommend a particular pass -by% for this case. 945 - Convenience Store/Gas Station - VFP (9.15) (General Urban/Suburban) ITE does not recommend a particular pass -by% for this case. F SUMMARY Total Entering 186 Total Exiting 179 Total Entering Reduction 0 Total Exiting Reduction 0 Total Entering Internal Capture Reduction 0 Total Exiting Internal Capture Reduction 0 Total Entering Pass -by Reduction 89 Total Exiting Pass -by Reduction 88 Total Entering Non -Pass -by Trips 97 Total Exiting Non -Pass -by Trips 91 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 140 Packet Pg. 490 9.A.2.f Livingston Veterans — Commercial Planned Unit Development — Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 PERIOD SETTING Analysis Name; PM Peak Hour Project Name: Veterans Commercial - No: Scenario 1 Date: 11/24/2021 City: StatelProvince: Zip/Postal Code: Country: Client Name: Analyst's Name: Edition: Trip Generation Manual, 11th Ed Land Use Independent Size Time Period Method Entry Exit Total Variable 822 - Strip Retail Plaza 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA 11 Weekday, Peak Best Fit (LOG) 42 41 83 (&lt;40k) (General Hour of Adjacent Ln(T) = 0.71 Ln(X) 51 % 49% Urban/Suburban) Street Traffic, +2.72 One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. 945 - Convenience 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 6 Weekday, Peak Average 164 163 327 Store/Gas Station - Hour of Adjacent 54.52 50% 50% VFP (9-15) (General Street Traffic, Urban/Suburban) One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. TRAFFIC REDUCTIONS Land Use Retry ed ction EnAdjusted Entry Exit Reduction Adjusted Exit 822 - Strip Retail Plaza (&lt;40k) 0 % 42 0 % 41 945 - Convenience Store/Gas Station 0 % 164 0 % 163 CINTERNAL TRIPS 822 - Strip Retail Plaza (&lt;40k) 945 - Convenience Store/Gas Station Exit 41 Demand Exit: 0 % (0) Balanced: Demand Entry: 0 % (0) Entry 164 Entry 42 Demand Entry: 0 % (0) Balanced: Demand Exit: 0 % (0) Exit 163 822 - Strip Retail Plaza (&lt;40k) Internal Trips Total Trips 945 - Convenience Total External Trips Store/Gas Station Entry 42 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 42 (100%) Exit 41 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) '41 (100%) Total 83 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 63 (100%) Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 141 Packet Pg. 491 Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 9.A.2.f 945 - Convenience Store/Gas Station Inbemal Trips Total Trips 822 -Strip Retai I Plaza Total External Trips (&lt;40k) Entry 164 (10D%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 164 (100%) Exit 163 (100%) 0 (0%) D (D%) 163 (100%) Total 327 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 327 (100%) Land Use 822 - Strip Retail Plaza (&lt;40k) 945 - Convenience Store/Gas Station EXTERNAL TRIPS External Trips Pass -by% 83 25 327 50 ITE DEVIATION DETAILS Pass -by Trips Non -pass -by Trips 21 62 164 163 Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Landuse No deviations from ITE. Methods No deviations from ITE. External Trips 822 - Strip Retail Plaza (&It40k) (General Urban/Suburban) ITE does not recommend a particular pass -by% for this case. 945 - Convenience Store/Gas Station - VFP (9-15) (General Urban/Suburban) ITE does not recommend a particular pass -by% for this case. SUMMARY Total Entering Total Exiting Total Entering Reduction Total Exiting Reduction Total Entering Internal Capture Reduction Total Exiting Internal Capture Reduction Total Entering Pass -by Reduction Total Exiting Pass -by Reduction Total Entering Non -Pass -by Trips Total Exiting Non -Pass -by Trips 206 204 0 0 0 0 92 93 114 111 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 142 Packet Pg. 492 9.A.2.f Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 Development Scenario 2 — Trip Generation Name: veterans Commercial - Scenario 2 No: 1112412021 [ISO.E.-tt'7.10province: City: Zip/Postal Code: Country: Client Name: Ans"Ve. Name: Edition: Trip Generation Manual, 11th Ed AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR Entry Exit Entry Exit Entry Exit 151 - AAlnl-Warehouse (General Urban/Suburban) so0) 58 56 4 3 6 6 Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 Internal 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -by 0 0 0 0 0 0 Non-pass-0y 58 58 4 3 6 6 945 -Convenience Store/Gas Station - VFP (9-15) (General Urb"uburban) a(f) 2102 2101 170 169 164 163 Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 Internal 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -by 641 840 85 85 82 82 Nor -pass -by 1261 1261 65 84 82 81 Total 2160 2159 174 172 170 169 Total Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Internal 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Pass -by 841 840 85 85 82 82 Total Non -pass -by 1319 1319 so 87 88 87 (1) 1000 Sq. Ft GFA Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 143 c M L C O r to C J N N M O O O N N O N J a ti Iq 00 n N Packet Pg. 493 Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 9.A.2.f 17 Analysis Name; Project Name: Date: State/Province: Country: Analyst's Name: PERIOD SETTING Daily Veterans Commercial - No: Scenario 2 11/24/2021 City: Zip/Postal Code: Client Name: Edition: Land Use Independent Size Time Period Variable 151 - Mini -Warehouse 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 80 Weekday (General Urban/Suburban) 945 - Convenience 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 6 Weekday Store/Gas Station - VFP (9-15) (General Urban/Suburban) Method Average 1.45 Average 700.43 TRAFFIC REDUCTIONS Land Use Entry Reduction i51 - Mini -Warehouse 0 945 - Convenience Store/Gas Station 0 Trip Generation Manual, 11th Ed Entry Exit Total 58 58 116 50% 50% 2102 2101 4203 50% 50% Adjusted Entry Exit Reduction Adjusted Exit 58 0 % 58 2102 0 % 2101 INTERNAL TRIPS 151 - Mini -Warehouse 945 - Convenience Store/Gas Station Exit 58 Demand Exit: 0 % (0) 0 Balanced: Demand Entry: 0 % (0) Entry 2102 Entry 58 Demand Entry: 0 % (0) Balanced'. Demand Exit: 0 % (0) Exit 2101 151 - Mini -Warehouse Internal Trips Total Trips 1945 - Convenience Total External Trips Store/Gas Station Entry 58 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 10(0%) 58 (100%) Exit 5B (100%) 0 (0%) 58 (100%) Total 116 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 116 (100%) 945 - Convenience Store/Gas Station Total Trips Internal Trips External Trips Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 144 Packet Pg. 494 9.A.2.f Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 1 151 -Mini-Warehouse Total Entry 2102 (100%) 1 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2102 (100%) Exit 2101 (100%) 0 (0%) j 0 (0%) 2101 (100%) Total 4203 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4203 (100%) CEXTERNAL TRIPS Land Use External Trips Pass -by% Pass -by Trips Non -pass -by Trips 151 - Mini -Warehouse 116 0 0 116 945 - Convenience Store/Gas Station 4203 40 1681 2522 ITE DEVIATION DETAILS Weekday Landuse No deviations from ITE. Methods No deviations from ITE. External Trips 151 - Mini -Warehouse (General Urban/Suburban) ITE does not recommend a particular pass-by°/a for this case. 945 - Convenience StorelGas Station - VFP (9-15) (General Urban/Suburban) ITE does not recommend a particular pass-bya/o for this case. SUMMARY Total Entering 2160 Total Exiting 2159 Total Entering Reduction 0 Total Exiting Reduction 0 Total Entering Internal Capture Reduction 0 Total Exiting Internal Capture Reduction 0 Total Entering Pass -by Reduction 841 Total Exiting Pass -by Reduction 840 Total Entering Non -Pass -by Trips 1319 Total Exiting Non -Pass -by Trips 1319 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g a 145 Packet Pg. 495 9.A.2.f Livingston Veterans — Commercial Planned Unit Development — Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 Analysis Name: AM Peak Hour Project Name: Veterans Commercial - No: Scenario 2 Date: 11124/2021 City: State/Province: Zip/Postal Code: Country: Client Name: Analyst's Name: Edition: Land Use Independent Size Variable 151 - Mini -Warehouse 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 60 (General Urban/Suburban) 945 - Convenience 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 6 Store/Gas Station - VFP (9-15) (General Urban/Suburban) Land Use 151 - Mini -Warehouse 945 - Convenience StorelGas Station 151 - Mini -Warehouse Exit 3 Demand Exit: 0 % (0) Entry 4 Demand Entry: 0 % (0) 151 - Mini -Warehouse Time Period Method Weekday, Peak Average Hour of Adjacent 0.09 Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. Weekday, Peak Average Hour of Adjacent 56.52 Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. TRAFFIC REDUCTIONS Trip Generation Manual, 11th Ed Entry Exit Total 4 3 7 57% 43% 170 169 339 50% 50% Entry Adjusted Entry Exit Reduction Adjusted Exit Reduction 0% 4 0% 3 0% 170 0% 169 INTERNAL TRIPS 945 - Convenience Store/Gas Station Balanced: Demand Entry: 0 % (0) Entry 170 0 Balanced: Demand Exit: 0 % (0) Exit 169 0 Internal Trips Total Trips 945 -Convenience Total External Trips Store/Gas Station Entry 4 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (100%) Exit 3 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (100%) Total 7 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 7 (100%) Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 146 Packet Pg. 496 9.A.2.f Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 945 - Convenience StorelGas Station Total Trips Entry 170 (100%) Exit 169 (100%) Total 339 (100%) Land Use 151 - Mini -Warehouse 945 - Convenience StorelGas Station Internal Trips real Trips 151 - Mlnl4liarehouse Total 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 170 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 169 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 339 (100%) EXTERNAL TRIPS External Trips Pass -by% 7 0 339 50 ITE DEVIATION DETAILS Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. Landuse No deviations from ITE. Methods No deviations from ITE. Pass -by Trips Non -pass -by Trips 0 7 170 169 External Trips 151 - Mlnl-Warehouse (General Urban/Suburban) ITE does not recommend a particular pass•by% for this case. 945 - Convenience Store/Gas Station - VFP (9-15) (General Urban/Suburban) ITE does not recommend a particular pass -by% for this case. SUMMARY Total Entering 174 Total Exiting 172 Total Entering Reduction 0 Total Exiting Reduction 0 Total Entering Internal Capture Reduction 0 Total Exiting Internal Capture Reduction 0 Total Entering Pass -by Reduction 85 Total Exiting Pass -by Reduction 85 Total Entering Non -Pass -by Trips 89 Total Exiting Non -Pass -by Trips 87 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 147 Packet Pg. 497 Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 9.A.2.f Analysis Name: Project Name: Date: State/Province: Country: Analyst's Name: PERIOD SETTING PM Peak Hour Veterans Commercial • No: Scenario 2 11124/2021 City: Zip/Postal Code: Client Name: Edition: Land Use Independent Size Time Period Method Variable 151 - Mini -Warehouse 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 60 Weekday, Peak Average (General Hour of Adjacent 0.15 Urban/Suburban) Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. 945 - Convenience 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 6 Weekday, Peak Average StorelGas Station - Hour of Adjacent 54.52 VFP (9-15) (General Street Traffic, Urban/Suburban) One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. TRAFFIC REDUCTIONS Land Use Entry Reduction 151 - Mini -Warehouse 0 % 945 - Convenience StorelGas Station 0 % Trip Generation Manual, 11th Ed Entry Exit Total 6 6 12 50% 50% 164 163 327 50% 50% Adjusted Entry Exit Reduction Adjusted Exit 6 0% 6 164 0 % 163 INTERNAL TRIPS 151 - Mini -Warehouse 945 - Convenience StorelGas Statlon Exit 6 Demand Exit: 0 % (0) BalanOced: Demand Entry: 0 % (0) Entry 164 Entry 6 Demand Entry: 0 % (0) BalanOced: Demand Exit, 0 % (0) Exit 163 151 - Mini -Warehouse Internal Trips Total Trips 945 . Convenience Total External Trips StorelGas Station Entry 6 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 6 (100%) Exit 6 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 6 (100%) Total 12 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 112 (100%) J J Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a a F 148 Packet Pg. 498 9.A.2.f Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 945 - Convenience StorelGas Station Total Trips Entry 164 (100%) Exit 163 (100%) Total 327 (100%) Land Use 151 - Mini -Warehouse 945 - Convenience StorelGas Station Internal Trips real Trips 151 - Mlnl4liarehouse Total 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 164 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 163 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 327 (100%) EXTERNAL TRIPS External Trips Pass -by% 12 0 327 50 ITE DEVIATION DETAILS Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Landuse No deviations from ITE. Methods No deviations from ITE. Pass -by Trips Non -pass -by Trips 0 12 164 163 External Trips 151 - Mlnl-Warehouse (General Urban/Suburban) ITE does not recommend a particular pass•by% for this case. 945 - Convenience Store/Gas Station - VFP (9-15) (General Urban/Suburban) ITE does not recommend a particular pass -by% for this case. SUMMARY Total Entering 170 Total Exiting 169 Total Entering Reduction 0 Total Exiting Reduction 0 Total Entering Internal Capture Reduction 0 Total Exiting Internal Capture Reduction 0 Total Entering Pass -by Reduction 82 Total Exiting Pass -by Reduction 82 Total Entering Non -Pass -by Trips 88 Total Exiting Non -Pass -by Trips 87 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 149 Packet Pg. 499 9.A.2.f Livingston Veterans — Commercial Planned Unit Development — Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 Development Scenario 3 —Trip Generation Project Name: Veterans commercial - Scenario 3 No: Date: 11130/2021 C ity: State/Province: Zip/Postal Code: Country' Client Nams: Analysts Name: Edition: Trip Generation Manuel, 11th Ed DAILY AM PEAK HOUR SIZE Entry Exit Entry Exit 621 - Shopping Plaza (40450k) - Supermarket - No (General Urbanit Reduction Internal Pase-by Non-passby Total Total Reduction Total Internal Total Posary Total N*"w*a-by (1) 1000 Sq. Ft GLA Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA PM PEAK HOUR Entry Exit uburban) 50(9 1688 1688 54 33 127 133 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 253 253 14 8 32 33 1435 1435 40 25 95 100 1688 1588 54 33 127 133 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 253 253 14 8 32 33 1435 1 1435 1 40 125 1 95 1 100 P a g e 150 Packet Pg. 500 Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 9.A.2.f L Analysis Name: Project Name Date: State/Province: Country: Analyst's Name: Daily Veterans Commercial Scenario 3 1113012021 No: City: Zip/Postal Code: Client Name: Edition: (Land Use Independent Size Time Period Method Variable 821 - Shopping Plaza 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA 50 Weekday Average (40-150k) - 67.52 Supermarket - No (General Urban/Suburban) TRAFFIC REDUCTIONS Trip Generation Manual, 11th Ed Entry Exit Total 1688 1688 3376 50% 50% Land Use Entry Reduction Adjusted Entry Exlt Reduction Adjusted Exit 821 - Shopping Plaza (40-150k) 0 % 1686 0 % 1688 EXTERNAL TRIPS Land Use External Trips Pass -by% Pass -by Trips Non -pass -by Trips 821 - Shopping Plaza (40-150k) 3376 15 506 2870 ITE DEVIATION DETAILS Weekday Landuse No deviations from ITE. Methods No deviations from ITE. External Trips 821 - Shopping Plaza (40-150k) - Supermarket - No (General Urban/Suburban) ITE does not recommend a particular pass -by% for this case. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g a 1 51 Packet Pg. 501 Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 9.A.2.f L F Analysis Name: Project Name Date: State/Province: Country: Analyst's Name: AM Peak Hour Veterans Commercial Scenario 3 1113012021 No: City: Zip/Postal Code: Client Name: Edition: Land Use Independent Size Time Period Method Variable 821 - Shopping Plaza 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA 50 Weekday, Peak Average (40-150k) - Hour of Adjacent 1.73 Supermarket - No Street Traffic, (General One Hour Urban/Suburban) Between 7 and 9 a.m. TRAFFIC REDUCTIONS Trip Generation Manual, 11th Ed Entry Exit Total 54 33 87 62% 38% Land Use Entry Reduction Adjusted Entry Exit Reduction Adjusted Exit 821 - Shopping Plaza (40-150k) 0 % 54 0 % 33 EXTERNAL TRIPS Land Use External Trips Pass -by% Pass -by Trips Non -pass -by Trips 821 - Shopping Plaza (40-150k) 87 45 22 85 ITE DEVIATION DETAILS Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. Landuse No deviations from ITE. Methods No deviations from ITE. External Trips 821 - Shopping Plaza (40-150k) - Supermarket - No (General Urban/Suburban) ITE does not recommend a particular pass -by% for this case. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g a 1 52 Packet Pg. 502 Livingston Veterans -Commercial Planned Unit Development -Traffic Impact Statement -January 2024 9.A.2.f L F Analysis Name: Project Name Date: State/Province: Country: Analyst's Name: PM Peak Hour Veterans Commercial Scenario 3 1113012021 No: City: Zip/Postal Code: Client Name: Edition: Land Use Independent Size Time Period Method Variable 821 - Shopping Plaza 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA 50 Weekday, Peak Average (40-150k) - Hour of Adjacent 5.19 Supermarket - No Street Traffic, (General One Hour Urban/Suburban) Between 4 and 6 p.m. TRAFFIC REDUCTIONS Trip Generation Manual, 11th Ed Entry Exit Total 127 133 260 49% 51% Land Use Entry Reduction Adjusted Entry Exit Reduction Adjusted Exit 821 - Shopping Plaza (40-150k) 0 % 127 0 % 133 EXTERNAL TRIPS Land Use External Trips Pass -by% Pass -by Trips Non -pass -by Trips 821 - Shopping Plaza (40-150k) 260 25 65 195 ITE DEVIATION DETAILS Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Landuse No deviations from ITE. Methods No deviations from ITE. External Trips 821 - Shopping Plaza (40-150k) - Supermarket - No (General Urban/Suburban) ITE does not recommend a particular pass -by% for this case. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g a 1 53 Packet Pg. 503 9.A.2.f Livingston Veterans — Commercial Planned Unit Development — Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 Appendix D Veterans Memorial Boulevard Improvements Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 154 Packet Pg. 504 Attachment: Attachment E-Application 2-2-24 [Revision 1] (27847 : PL20220003226 Livingston Veterans CPUD) Livingston Veterans — Commercial Planned Unit Development — Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 9.A.2.f c L c 0 N C J O N N M O O O N N O N J a ti 00 r- N Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Packet Pg. 506 9.A.2.f Livingston Veterans — Commercial Planned Unit Development — Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 Appendix E Transportation Element Map TR - 5 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 157 Packet Pg. 507 Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 9.A.2.f BONITA BEACH RD m WIGGINS PASS RD r J O111 TH AVE N �,— N 1 W E s fl 0.5 1 2 3 Miles It GIS MAPPING: BETH YANG. AICP AMENDED - JUNE 13. 2017 IOrd. No. 2017-25) r0 F1. 41 7 LEE COUNTY LINE P I ]MMQK a RD ,ALEEUz U) LL M> a � �U VANDERBILT BEACH RD rl PINE IMMOKALEE RD d GOLDEN GATE m _ BLVD_ z o 177� ndusv at oa N€rtAV OiWit! V_L Pa-mla C3TCMA Bd day TR - 5Cemmeriwl/M'ue Northwest Transportation Concurrency TManagement De Transportation Planning mrsp S ® Mked usa A XAty Centersueastr€a edton �E%Rln9ilansRRCrta, Management Area (TCMA) - ARe,rallCollector Roads rn c L d C O r to C J N N M O 0 O N N CD N J a I,- Iq 00 n N I Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 158 Packet Pg. 508 9.A.2.f Livingston Veterans — Commercial Planned Unit Development — Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 Appendix F 2023 AUIR - TCMA Report - Northwest TCMA Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 159 Packet Pg. 509 9.A.2.f Livingston Veterans - Commercial Planned Unit Development -Traffic Impact Statement -January 2024 Attachment I TCMA Report Collier County Transportation Concurrency Management System Northwest TCMA AUIR ID Street Name From To PkHr-PkDir VIC Ratio Length #Lanes Lane Miles Lane Miles @ VIC - 1.00 1.0 Airport Road Immokalee Road Vanderbilt Beach Road 0.52 1.97 4 7.9 7.89 2,1 Airport Road Vanderbilt Beach Road Orange Blossom Dr. 0.74 1,53 6 9.2 9.18 2.2 Airport Road Orange Blossom Dr. Pine Ridge Rd, 0.77 2.92 6 17.5 17.51 23.0 Goodlette-Frank Road Immokalee Road Vanderbilt Beach Road 0.71 1.80 2 3.6 3.60 24.1 Goodlette-Frank Road Vanderbilt Beach Road Orange Blossom Dr. 0.62 0.88 4 3.5 3.52 24.2 Goodlette-Frank Road Orange Blossom Dr. Pine Ride Road 0.68 1.53 6 9.2 9.18 29.0 Gulfshore Drive 111th Avenue Vanderbilt Beach Road 028 1,31 2 2.6 262 39.0 111 th Avenue N. Gulfshore Drive Vanderbilt Drive 0.47 0.51 2 1.0 1.01 40.0 111 th Avenue N. Vanderbilt Drive Tarn iamiTrail 0.68 1,00 2 2.0 2.01 41.1 Immokalee Road Tamiami Trail Goodlette-Frank Rd. 0.66 1.47 6 8.8 8.84 41.2 Immokalee Road Goodlette-Frank Rd. Airport Road 0.87 2.47 6 14.8 14.81 42.1 Immokalee Road Airport Road Livingston Rd. 0.91 1.96 6 11.8 11.79 422 Immokalee Road Livingston Rd. 1-75 0.88 1.78 7 12.5 12.48 51,0 Livingston Road Imperial Street Immokalee Road 060 331 6 19-8 19-85 52.0 Livingston Road Immokalee Road Vanderbilt Beach Road 0.56 1.99 6 12.0 11.96 53.0 Livingston Road Vanderbilt Beach Road Pine Ridge Road 0.53 2.21 6 13.3 1326 62,0 Old US 41 US 41 (Tamiami Trail) Lee County line 1.13 1.67 2 3.1 0.00 63.0 Seagate Drive Crayton Road Tamiami Trail 0.54 D.48 4 1.9 1.93 64.0 Pine Ridge Road Tamiami Trail Goodl ette- Frank Road 0.74 0.50 6 3.0 3.02 65.0 Pine Ridge Road Goodlette-Frank Road Shirley Street 0.82 0.67 6 4.0 4.05 66.0 Pine Ridge Road Shirley Street Airport Road 1.18 0.81 6 4.9 0.00 57.1 Pine Ridge Road Airport Road Livingston Rd. 0.93 2.09 6 12.56 12.56 98.0 Tamiami Trail North Lee County Line Wiggins Pass Road 0.72 1,67 6 10.0 10.02 99.0 Tamiami Trail North Wiggins Pass Road Immokalee Road 1.04 1.52 6 9.1 0.00 100.0 Tamiami Trail North Immokalee Road Vanderbilt Beach Road 0.78 1.51 6 9.1 9.06 101.0 Tamiami Trail North Vanderbilt Beach Road Gulf Park Drive 0.82 1.26 6 7.6 7.58 102.0 Tamiami Trail North Gulf Park Drive Pine Ridge Road 0.72 1.44 6 8.6 8.64 109.0 Vanderbiit Beach Road Gulfshore Drive Tamiami Trail 0,67 1,34 2 2.7 2.68 110.1 Vanderbift Beach Road Tamiami Trail Goodlette-Frank Road 0.80 1.67 4 7.6 7.60 110.2 Vanderbilt Beach Road Goodlette-Frank Rd. Airport Road 0.74 2,40 4 9.6 9.58 111.1 Vanderbilt Beach Road Airport Road Livingston Rd. 0.92 3.22 6 19.3 19.30 111.2 Vanderbilt Beach Road Livingston Rd. 1-75 0.93 1.00 6 6.0 6.00 114.0 Vanderbilt Drive Lee County Line Wiggins Pass Road 0.60 2.52 2 5.0 5.03 115.0 Vanderbilt Drive Wiggins Pass Road 111th Avenue 0.57 1.49 2 3.0 2.99 11T0 Wiggins Pass Road Vanderbilt Drive Tamiami Trail 044 1 D5 2 21 2.10 142.0 Orange Blossom Drive Goodlette-Frank Road Airport Road 0.52 1.35 2 2.70 2.70 143.0 Orange Blossom Drive Airport Road Livingston Road "0 1.D1 2 2.02 2A2 59.44 293.39 266.26 Total Lane Miles: 283.4 Lane Miles -1.0 VIC: 266.3 fO vrc Ratio based upon Total Tragic, including Traffic Counts + Total Tnp Bank Percent Lane Miles Meeting Standard: 94.0% DRAFT - MASTER Attachment F-2023 (072823) 20 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 160 Packet Pg. 510 9.A.2.f Livingston Veterans — Commercial Planned Unit Development — Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 Appendix G Transportation Element Map TR - 7 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P - - - 1 61 Packet Pg. 511 Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 9.A.2.f g w we s �79 D 2.5 5 10 15 4 Miles MS Mapping: Beth Yang 1Vi i°'0�°�P0 a Flle� C-vacu�lonidnuresmxn i 4, r`t S a 41 41 in.41 ' ;��• ��;,�1 . it Traffic Control PaTR-7nts y Evacua0on Routes COLLIER COUNTY TransportatlonServices Dlvlslon CaderCaurft Water Bodies Transportation Planning Department 0 County Boundary HURRICANE EVACUATION ROUTES Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g E. 1 62 to c L 0 to C J N N M 0 0 0 N N O N J a r� 00 N Packet Pg. 512 9.A.2.f Livingston Veterans — Commercial Planned Unit Development — Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 Appendix H Transportation Element Map TR - 3 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 63 Packet Pg. 513 9.A.2.f Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 j rr , v N i�"� ••1 W _ E ' 1 r S y� IMMOKALEE U 1 2 4 6 B z ® Miles LEE CDUNTY 1 COLLIER COUNTY C i INSET 3 u W ¢ 1 m 0 =ta � a a CITY OF .......f �.......... BONITA ORANGETREE i PRINGS ' SPRINGS EONITASs I. 1 INSET2 I_ HENDRY CO...rTY ....................—......—...................... o COLLIER COUNTY INSET 1 1 e _ 1 y � 1 LEGEND 1 i P 1 � INTERSTATE ' OTHER FREEWAYS AND EXPRESSWAYS }` 1 CITY OF/ j --- OTHER PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL NAPLLS INSET biz MINORARTERIAL 7 =O ;Q MAJOR COLLECTOR aka MINOR COLLECTOR =13 � 10 LOCAL O tis u i. 0 2010 SMOOTHED URBANIZED BOUNDARY i i 0 2010 SMOOTHED SMALL URBAN BOUNDARY ;CITY OF� RECOMMENDED BY: MARCO j COLLIER COUNTY MPO Leg ISLAND I. ' INSET 5 G O GATE I a FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF _I TRANSPORTATION DATE GULF of g APPROVED BY: OF a MEXICO.................................... ................•...................... FEOER0.LHIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION DATE FDOT DISTRICT ONE - MAP 131 FEDERAL FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION / URBAN BOUNDARIES - COLLIER COUNTY FTE 10/31/2013 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 64 rn c L Q1 C O N C J L14 N N M O O 0 N N O N J a ti DD l N Packet Pg. 514 9.A.2.f Livingston Veterans — Commercial Planned Unit Development — Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 Appendix I Access Management Policy - Table 1 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P - 1 65 Packet Pg. 515 9.A.2.f Livingston Veterans —Commercial Planned Unit Development —Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 Table 1 Access Classification and Standards Access Facility Features (Median Treatment Minimum Connection Minimum Median Opening Minimum Signal Class and Access Roads) Spacing (feet)(2)(3) Spacing (mile)(2) Directional Full (feet)(2) (feet)(2) 1 Limited Access NIA NIA N/A 1 2 Controlled Access 1320 / 600 1320 2640 0.5 ...i.........Aaiaaiiidv�i�dr........... Yi3 1.........Y%........1%2Q........■.�i...■ 4 Arterials, undivided 6601330 N/A N/A 5 ...�■.■.....igenais Arterials, divided 330 / 220 d.....a.....T33%M.........r.........t�/�.........'b ,uridIvie 440 R� 1320/660 'T 0,5 0.51.25 Jr... 7 Arterials, divided and undivided 125 330 0.25 Notes: (Greater than or equal to 45 mph/less than 45 mph) (1) Section Four of this Policy contains supplementary and more detailed instruction for use of these standards. (2) These minimum spacing standards may not be adequate if auxiliary lanes and storage is required. (3) Single properties with frontages exceeding the minimum spacing criteria may not necessarily receive permits for the maximum number of possible connections. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 166 Packet Pg. 516 9.A.2.f Livingston Veterans — Commercial Planned Unit Development — Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 Appendix is Turning Movements Exhibits Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 67 Packet Pg. 517 9.A.2.f Livingston Veterans — Commercial Planned Unit Development — Traffic Impact Statement —January 2024 t � PROJECT TURNING Cdl nl N N❑- MOVEMENT MAP BY _ ' PERCENTAGE AND PM JOPTION 1 - LIVINGSTON RD NTS PEAK HOUR RIGHT-IN/RIGHT/OUT ACCESS t 7 Talcs Park I:1 a I ' aaanas�raC aeaaa:o : &anaaaro co 49%; PM 101 25%PM 51 YelCans Menaial &Ivd 4eraens M�saarigl BNd v¢1¢rane Memorial BNd YeaMmaeNd Memoal BNd P a rtye S I 1 oarary m OVME PTO 0 I Alldra 41 1 pee'a.an wr 1 75%; PM 153 51 %; PM 105 Ab.d . W o a �o Ardenav 9 r 7 Ardenav � a PROJECT TURNING OPTION 2 - LIVINGSTON RD �^ MOVEMENT MAP BY - DIRECTIONAL MEDIAN PERCENTAGE AND PM LEFT-IN/RIGHT-IN/RIGHT/OUT ACCESS NTS PEAK HOUR = m v Tails Park NO o I BuanascrmC n °elatrna Cl i �Yaneaera Cl 29%; PM 60 25%; PM 51PM 51 Yelnans Mameriol BNd txone emwa emo- Veterans MenMalBVd 4elonns Memorial BNd von Mom4.1 BWtl Y�erw.Manadal6lrtl I i.aole=- - Pa,'entlers-Bc'eis'ar� v � I 1 oe.cE.y Lti OVME PFO I Allura 20%; PM 41 ry4 11 ' \ , 1 ppe,tlesn Vfv 1 75%; PM 153 oL_ � 51%; PM 105 wy. anmleanwv � L a x � Ardenav ; Ardenav Pam Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 168 Packet Pg. 518 9.A.2.f STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS FOR PUD REZONE REQUEST APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s): Richard Yovanovich and Chris Scott, AICP Address: 2600 Golden Gate Parkway Telephone: 239-435-3535, 239-403-6727 City: Naples Cell: State: FL ZIP: 34105 E-Mail Address: rovanovich@cyklawfirm, cscott@pen-eng.com, & andrew@ajsrealtygroup.com Address of Subject Property (If available): City: Naples State: FL ZIP: 34105 PROPERTY INFORMATION Section/Township/Range: S13 / T48 / R25 Lot: Block: Subdivision: Metes & Bounds Description: Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: 00150080006, 00149720005 TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO BE PROVIDED Check applicable system: a. County Utility System b. City Utility System ❑ Provide Name: C. Franchised Utility System ❑ (GPD Capacity): d. Package Treatment Plant ❑ Type: e. Septic System ❑ TYPE OF WATER SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED Check applicable system: County System a. Utility b. City Utility System ❑ C. Franchised Utility System ❑ Provide Name: d. Private System (Well) ❑ Total Population to be Served: Peak and Average Daily Demands: A. Water -Peak: 33,488 gpd Average Daily: 25,760 gpd B. Sewer -Peak: 53.2 gpm Average Daily: 18,400 gpd Packet Pg. 519 9.A.2.f Narrative statement: Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and schematic drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the method of affluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation data and soil involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional engineer. Attach additional pages if necessary. N/A - project will connect to County Utility infrastructure Collier County Utility Dedication Statement: If the project is Collier County's utility service system, a notarized statement the water distribution and sewage collection facilities within Utilities. This shall occur upon completion of the accordance with all applicable County ordinances in service boundaries of agreeing to dedicate :o the Collier County these facilities in effect at that time. This statement shall also include an agreement that the applicable system development charges and connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. If applicable, the statement shall contain an agreement to dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer systems. 01-. located within the shall be provided the project area construction of Statement of Availability Capacity from other Providers: Unless waived or otherwise provided for at the pre -application meeting, if the project is to receive sewer or potable water services from any provider other than the County, a statement from that provider indicating adequate capacity to serve the project shall be provided. Packet Pg. 520 9.A.2.1 VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD LIS R^ AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY COPYRIGHT OF COLLIER COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER 2022 PENINSULAfij LIVINGSTON ENGINEERING .1. • CIVIL ENGINEERING • LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT VETERANS • ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES • LANDDEVELOPMENT 239.403.6700 COMMERCIAL Pen-Eng.com Florida Engineering CA #28275 TITLE: A I V •� s 0 50' 100' 200' 400' 60 C E LEGEND PARCELBOUNDARY EXISTING COUNTY DRAINAGE INFRASTRUCTURE o� ^^^� EXISTING FLOWWAY PROPOSED STORM WATER MGMT SYSTEM PROPOSED OUTFALL STORMWATER OUTFALL EXHIBIT OWNER/CLIENT/CONSULTANT: LIVINGSTON VETERANS COMMERCIAL, LLC. SEC: 13 TWP:48S RGE: Designed by: Drawn by: Date: MARCH Drawing Scale: 1.. = Project Number: P-LIVC-001---. File Number: P-LIVC-001-001-X07 Sheet Packet Pg. 521 9.A.2.g (CHAPTER 8, COLLIER COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT) A zoning sign(s) must be posted by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent on the parcel for a minimum of fifteen (15) calendar days in advance of the first public hearing and said sign(s) must be maintained by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent through the Board of County Commissioners Hearing. Below are general guidelines for signs, however these guidelines should not be construed to supersede any requirement of the LDC. For specific sign requirements, please refer to the Administrative Code, Chapter 8 E. The sign(s) must be erected in full view of the public, not more than five (5) feet from the nearest street right-of-way or easement. The sign(s) must be securely affixed by nails, staples, or other means to a wood frame or to a wood panel and then fastened securely to a post, or other structure. The sign may not be affixed to a tree or other foliage. The petitioner or the petitioner's agent must maintain the sign(s) in place, and readable condition until the requested action has been heard and a final decision rendered. If the sign(s) is destroyed, lost, or rendered unreadable, the petitioner or the petitioner's agent must replace the sign(s NOTE: AFTER THE SIGN HAS BEEN POSTED, THIS AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE SHOULD BE RETURNED NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORKING DAYS BEFORE THE FIRST HEARING DATE TO THE ASSIGNED PLANNER. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER BEFORE THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, PERSONALLY APPEARED Christopher O. Scott WHO ON OATH SAYS THAT HE/SHE HAS POSTED PROPER NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 10.03.00 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE ON THE PARCEL COVERED IN PETITION NUMBER PL2o ZZoop ��5 � �L?oZ2goa ?j2.L�c 2600 Golden Gate Parkway OF APPLICANr OR AGENT STREET OR P.O. BOX Christopher O. Scott Naples, FL 34105 NAME (TYPED OR PRINTED) CITY, STATE ZIP STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was sworn to and subscribed before me this 21St day of February—, 2024, by Christopher O. Scott personally known to me or who produced as identification and who did/did not take an oath. KIM D. DAVIDSON =_°; •��`; Notary Public - State of Florida =� • i "5 Commission x HH 2O1826 My Comm. Expires Feb 19, 2026 Banded through National Notary Assn. My Commission Expires: (Stamp with serial number) 06 of Notary Public O5;0.- Printed Name of Notary Public Rev. 3/4/2015 Packet Pg. 522 9.A.2.g PENINSULA :NGINEERING LIVINGSTON ROAD/VETERANS MEMORIAL BOULEVARD COMMERCIAL INFILL SUBDISTRICT (GMPA-PL20220003225) LIVINGSTON VETERANS CPUD (PUDZ-PL20220003226) Public Hearing Sign Posting — February 21, 2024 yWy N d-.i BLVD ti {1 Packet Pg. 523 9.A.3.a Co(C ie r County STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPC) FROM: COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING SECTION, ZONING DIVISION, GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT HEARING DATE: MARCH 7, 2024 RE: PL20240000400, Ten -Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan, Growth Management Plan Amendment. (TRANSMITTAL HEARING) NOTE: CCPC/Environmental Advisory Council approval is required AGENT/APPLICANT: Public Utilities Department Engineering and Project Management Division Collier County Government 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Suite 303 Naples, FL 34112 GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The proposed Growth Management Plan amendment (GMPA) is not location -specific. REOUESTED ACTION: The proposed text change seeks to amend the Potable Water Sub -Element of the Public Facilities Element and the Capital Improvement Element to update the reference to our next Ten -Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan, as required for Collier County by Section 163.3177(6)(c), Florida Statutes. Policy 1.7 is proposed to be amended as follows: OBJECTIVE 1: Locate and develop potable water supply sources to meet the future needs of the County owned and operated systems, said supply sources meeting the minimum Level of Service Standards established by this Plan. The development and utilization of new potable water supply sources and the acquisition of land necessary for such development shall be based upon the information, guidelines, and procedures identified within the County's Ten - Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan (as updated) and the Lower West Coast Water Supply Plan prepared by the South Florida Water Management District. [Note: No revisions to Policies 1.1 through 1.6 are proposed.] PL20240000400 GMPA Ten -Year Water Supply — Potable Water Sub element of the Public Facilities Element Packet Pg. 524 9.A.3.a Policy 1.7: The County has developed the Ten -Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan, dated January 2024, in accordance with the water supply guidelines of the most current version of the South Florida Water Management District's Lower West Coast Water Supply Plan. The County's Ten -Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan is incorporated herein by reference. STAFF ANALYSIS: As Policy 1.7 of the Public Facilities Element, Potable Water Sub -Element indicates, the County has developed the Ten -Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan. The proposed text amendment seeks to adopt the updated version of the County's plan, which has been prepared in accordance with the most current version of the South Florida Water Management District's Lower West Coast Water Supply Plan. The updated version of the Ten -Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan is proposed for incorporation into the County's GMP by reference. Regional Planning: In December 2022, the Governing Board of the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) approved the 2022 Lower West Coast Water Supply Plan (LWCWSP) Update. Under Florida law (section 163.3177(6)(c), Florida Statutes), Collier County must adopt amendments to its comprehensive plan within 18 months of the SFWMD's approval of the update. These amendments include the development of an updated Ten — Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan and amendments to the Growth Management Plan (GMP). The LWCWSP amendment required the five water management districts to initiate regional water supply planning in all areas of the State. The purpose of regional water supply planning is to develop strategies to meet future water demands of urban and agricultural uses while meeting the needs of the environment. This process identifies historical uses of water and water source options to meet potential shortfalls. Each regional water supply plan is based on at least a 10-year future planning horizon, and a complete update of each plan is required every five years. The Lower West Coast Water Supply Planning Area includes Lee County and portions of Charlotte, Collier, Glades, Hendry, and Monroe counties. The 2022 Lower West Coast Water Supply Plan Update (LWC Update) was approved by the SFWMD Governing Board in December 2022. The LWC Update assesses projected water demands and potential water sources for the period through 2040. PL20240000400 GMPA Ten -Year Water Supply — Potable Water Sub element of the Public Facilities Element Packet Pg. 525 9.A.3.a SVINSOTA j I�rt ` {lrrrfat# N+ffGUF DE 50T0 r ! HI*-HLANOhs CHARLOTTE SINFWMD I GLA 5 V, r— ---- R — Cape 4=^ Coral • •Fort r ai I iv GULF OF MEXICO n Lower West Coast Planning Area Big Cypress Basin Administrative Area �- NWFWMD oc'i'.i.L' SRWMD 5.1RWMO 5WFWMID Gi:1.1' c71' M F.l fi f7 S F rr1 D Locat ton on ,• main map 0 Myers I Lehigh il�nloaronrlree L E E Acres I STo�iglrSYhfe I � Furrsl r• — J ., Imrnokalee.l. rUr 4 NirrI77J11 ::i :..::::::: .::: ... k ....... n'ita S rugs .... ... Big Cypress Basin aples �� !'ire7lJrrrr of M7:rt I.T ir• Fak rillrh he, 5� Lake — Okeechobee HENDRY wool Fro ?e I linwoka ter Reser alion .... .... mmsmmsssm == J C0LLIE:R: Marco TSlanrf'rel relrrrri LAi Rooktrll8rt15 •i'Prf 77JaJ+sand -_ - _ lsinrfds NRttmlal LVildli fe 1{irr�v M-O;NRQE; ..................... r D 5 10 24 w K e s Miles I I I I L. I ran.sKv rJL,—I Na M22091 LwC_urn — Figure 1-1. LWC Water Supply Planning Area. Source: 2022 Lower West Coast Water Supply Plan Update PL20240000400 GMPA Ten -Year Water Supply — Potable Water Sub element of the Public Facilities Element 3 Packet Pg. 526 9.A.3.a Local Planning: In December 2022, the SFWMD's Governing Board approved the 2022 Lower West Coast Water Supply Plan Update. Therefore, Collier County must adopt the proposed GMP text amendment referencing the County's proposed Ten -Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan by June 28, 2024 (or 18 months after the District Governing Board approved each regional water supply plan) [s. 163.3177(6)(c), F.S.]. Proposed Ten -Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan update: As noted in the attached Ten -Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan, the updated document addresses the following objectives: • Identifies population and water demands of the County and each utility for the planning period, 2023 to 2033. • Presents existing and planned potable and reclaimed water facilities that will be utilized to meet demand projections. • Identifies sources of raw water needed for potable water and irrigation water supply to meet demands through the year 2033. • Identifies the steps necessary to develop additional potable and reclaimed water supplies and specifies when they must occur and how they will be funded. • Demonstrates that the water supply plans for each utility within the County are feasible with respect to facility capacity to be developed and consumptive use permit allocations required. • Describes the conservation practices and regulations utilized by the County and each utility to meet water supply demand. The population methodology used by the Collier County Water Sewer District and the Collier County Growth Management Department for the Ten -Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan is based on the County's latest adopted Annual Update Inventory Report and Capital Improvement Element (AUIR-CIE) available at the time the plan was created (2023 AUIR-CIE). Please note that because of updates to data, the proposed Ten -Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan will differ from the 2022 Lower West Coast Plan Update, as well as the most recent AUIR-CIE documents. These variances have been vetted with SFWMD staff, who agree that the population methodology is appropriate. The other utility providers have used alternative population methodologies, which are also consistent with state statutes and have been vetted by SFWMD staff. This Ten -Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan was prepared by the County's consultant, Johnson Engineering, in coordination with Public Utilities Department and Growth Management Department staff, as well as representatives from various private and public utilities, and includes the areas of the County served by the Collier County Water and Sewer District, the Ave Maria Utility Company (AMUC), the Immokalee Water and Sewer District (IWSD), and the Port of the Islands Capital Improvement District. Also referenced in the plan are the Lee Cypress Water and Sewer Co -Op, Inc., as well as several small -capacity water systems regulated by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) (see section 3.7 of the attached plan). These did not meet the minimum size requirements to be included in facility reporting. In substance, the CCWSD portions of the Plan update provide detail behind the following broad subject areas: (a) Existing Facilities (Section 4): The CCWSD is served by two interconnected water treatment plants, the North County Regional Water Treatment Plant and the South County Regional Water Treatment Plant, with maximum finished water production capacities of 20 MGD and 32 MGD, respectively. PL20240000400 GMPA 4 Ten -Year Water Supply — Potable Water Sub element of the Public Facilities Element Packet Pg. 527 9.A.3.a Three wellfields provide raw water for the plants, drawing from both brackish and freshwater sources. Collier County has been a leader in the use of brackish water source production. Along with these production and wellfield facilities, the CCWSD contains over 1,200 miles of transmission and distribution pipelines, water storage tanks, pumping facilities, and approximately 86,400 individual service connections. In addition, the CCWSD operates one of the largest irrigation quality (IQ) water systems in South Florida, with contractual commitments of over 23 MGD to golf course communities, parks, and roadway medians. (b) Planned Water Supply Facilities (Section 5): Based on the 2023 AUIR population and Level of Service (LOS) standard, the Plan update indicates 2033 as the optimal first production year for the new Northeast Regional Water Treatment Plant Wellfield Phase 1. (c) Facilities Capacity Analysis (Chapter 6): Plans to bring online a new potable water treatment facility and associated wellfield during the Ten-year period will allow CCWSD to stay ahead of the demand curve during the Ten-year planning period. (d) Conservation (Section 7): Conservation measures have been an important element in CCWSD planning for many years. Local regulations on domestic irrigation, low flow devices, Florida Friendly landscape principles, Fridays are Dry Days, and a block rate structure have been employed and will be continually improved. A meter replacement program is now underway, and efficiency gains at the Regional Plants and throughout the Distribution system are being realized. (e) Capital Improvement Projects (Section R. Subsections present the capital improvement projects planned by each utility, including the funding source, timelines, project name, and cost estimate for each project. A depiction of the District boundaries for each of the covered utilities follows: PL20240000400 GMPA Ten -Year Water Supply — Potable Water Sub element of the Public Facilities Element Packet Pg. 528 9.A.3.a Collier County Water -Sewer District Current and Future Water Service Areas R25E I R26E R27E R28E R29E R30E N 0 1 3 5 8 10 ��11 lZ Miles o�S Legend ''"' Imm4kaEee Water & Sewer D15tli[t Collier County Water Service Area k• a - Distnbuthri Area Future Water Serv-ce Area ly _ Served by Olhers r ci u7 [Z3 Excluded Fram GGWSD by Special Acl a Cislrict t3aunClary �LI ■ ll i1 1+ U Mall13 - - Ln 9V 60 - • nr CO 53 ti 0 ,I _ C a e n n er ;y I+ n w n >o • +i + U) Cq h Figure PWA Uy of N.Oes City of Marco Island 6istritnrtion Area Ste,rerrs l,2fdl hg - KW MxC4 M1m" WY.a cpp WO Sy Cfi a! Mom 5�,� h�R vlilpn mrogrd br Cdl�m ��r Source: Collier County 10 Year Water Supply Plan Update, 2023 PL20240000400 GMPA 6 Ten -Year Water Supply — Potable Water Sub element of the Public Facilities Element Packet Pg. 529 9.A.3.a Statutory Requirements: The Department of Commerce (DOC) has published "A Guide to Preparation of the Water Supply Facilities Work Plan". Local governments must comply with the following statutory requirements for water supply and facility planning (Each requirement followed by staff comment in bold and italics): Coordinate appropriate aspects of their comprehensive plan with the appropriate water management district's regional water supply plan. [Section 163.3177(4)(a), F.S.]. The current GMP contains Goals, Objectives, and Policies that were adopted to maintain coordination with the SFWMD's water supply plan. 2. Revise the Potable Water Sub -Element to adopt a water supply facility work plan covering at least a 10- year planning period to meet existing and projected demand. The work plan should address those water supply facilities for which the local government is responsible and include the facilities needed to develop alternative water supplies. The work plan should also identify conservation and reuse measures to meet future needs. [Section 163.3177(6)(c), F.S.] Policy 1.7 of the Potable Water Sub -Element was amended by Ordinance 09-04 to incorporate by reference the County's 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan. This proposed GMP amendment seeks to adopt the revised update to the plan, which identifies the County's traditional and alternative water supply sources to meet existing and projected needs for the 10 year period; the capital improvements that will be needed to develop, treat, and deliver those alternative supplies, and the conservation measures and reuse supplies utilized to offset demand for new water. The County also updates its Capital Improvement Element on a yearly basis through the AUIR- CIE to include the capital improvements needed in the first five years of the 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan. Revise the Conservation Element to assess current and projected water needs and sources for at least a 10- year planning period. The analysis must consider the existing levels of water conservation, use, and protection and the applicable policies of the water management district and the district's approved regional water supply plan. In the absence of an approved regional water supply plan, the analysis must consider the district's approved water management plan. [Section 163.3177(6)(d)3, F.S.] The current Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the GMP contains Goals, Objectives, and Policies that consider the SFWMD levels of water conservation, use, and protection. 4. Revise the Capital Improvements Element to identify capital improvement projects to be implemented in the first five years of the work plan for which the local government is responsible, including both publicly and privately funded water supply projects necessary to achieve and maintain the adopted level of service standards; and adopt a 5-year schedule of capital improvements to include those projects as either funded or unfunded, and if unfunded, given a level of priority for funding. [163.3177(3)(a)4, F.S.] The County updates its Capital Improvement Element on a yearly basis through the AUIR-CIE to include the capital improvements needed in the first five years of the 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan. Revise the Intergovernmental Coordination Element to adopt principles and guidelines to be used to coordinate the comprehensive plan with the regional water supply authority (if applicable) and with the applicable regional water supply plan. [163.3177(6)(h)l, F.S.] The current Intergovernmental Coordination Element of the GMP contains Goals, Objectives, and Policies that provide principles and guidance for coordination with the SFWMD and otherpublic andprivate utilities regarding water supply planning. 6. During the Evaluation and Appraisal review, determine if comprehensive plan amendments are necessary to reflect statutory changes related to water supply and facilities planning since the last update to the comprehensive plan. If necessary, transmit the amendments to incorporate the statutory changes as PL20240000400 GMPA Ten -Year Water Supply — Potable Water Sub element of the Public Facilities Element Packet Pg. 530 9.A.3.a appropriate. [Section 163.3191(1) and (2), F.S.] The adopted County's EAR -based amendments included revisions to several of its Elements to revise references to the County's 2014 Water and Wastewater Master Plan Update document and include the adopted Ten -Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan, the Lower West Coast Water Supply Plan, and the Water Master Plan as the County's appropriate documents for water supply planning. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM) SYNOPSIS A NIM is not required under the provisions of the Collier County Land Development Code Chapter 10.03.00: Notice Requirements. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: The Office of the County Attorney has reviewed and approved this staff report on 2/16/2024. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: For the Collier County Planning Commission, acting as the Environmental Advisory Council and the Local Planning Agency, to forward Petition PL20240000400 to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation to approve for Transmittal to the Florida Department of Commerce and other statutorily required agencies. PL20240000400 GMPA Ten -Year Water Supply — Potable Water Sub element of the Public Facilities Element Packet Pg. 531 9.A.3.b RESOLUTION NO.2024- RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PROPOSING AMENDMENT TO THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, ORDINANCE 89-05, AS AMENDED, SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE POTABLE WATER SUB - ELEMENT OF THE PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT TO AMEND POLICY 1.7 TO REFERENCE THE UPDATED TEN YEAR WATER SUPPLY FACILITIES WORK PLAN, AND AMENDING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT TO CHANGE THE LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS FOR COUNTY POTABLE WATER SYSTEMS AND COUNTY SANITARY SEWER -WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS; AND FURTHERMORE DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE [PL20240000400] WHEREAS, Collier County, pursuant to Section 163.3161, et. seq., Florida Statutes, the Florida Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act of 1985, was required to prepare and adopt a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners adopted the Collier County Growth Management Plan on January 10, 1989; and WHEREAS, the Community Planning Act of 2011 provides authority for local governments to amend their respective comprehensive plans and outlines certain procedures to amend adopted comprehensive plans; and WHEREAS, Collier County staff has initiated this amendment to the Future Land Use Element; and WHEREAS, on , the Collier County Planning Commission considered the proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan pursuant to the authority granted to it by Section 163.3174, F.S., and has recommended approval of said amendment to the Board of County Commissioners; and WHEREAS, on , the Board of County Commissioners at a public hearing approved the transmittal of the proposed amendment to the state land planning agency in accordance with Section 163.3184, F.S.; and WHEREAS, upon receipt of Collier County's proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment, various State agencies and the Department of Commerce have thirty (30) days to review the proposed amendment and DEO must transmit, in writing, to Collier County its comments within said thirty (30) days pursuant to Section 163.3184, F.S.; and [24-CMP-01211/1839640/1]13 Page 1 of 2 01/17/24 PL20240000400 Words underlined are additions; Words 4paek +hre„rth are deletions. Packet Pg. 532 9.A.3.b WHEREAS, Collier County, upon receipt of the written comments from DEO must adopt, adopt with changes or not adopt the proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment within one hundred and eighty (180) days of such receipt pursuant to Section 163.3184, F.S.; and WHEREAS, the Department of Commerce, within five (5) days of receipt of Collier County's adopted Growth Management Plan Amendment, must notify the County of any deficiencies of the Plan Amendment pursuant to Section 163.3184(3), F.S. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: The Board of County Commissioners hereby approves the proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated by reference herein, for the purpose of transmittal to the Department of Commerce and other reviewing agencies thereby initiating the required State evaluation of the Growth Management Plan Amendment prior to final adoption. THIS RESOLUTION ADOPTED after motion, second and majority vote this day of 92024. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK IC Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legality: Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA CHRIS HALL, Chairman Attachment: Exhibit A- Text Amendment CIE and Public Facilities Element [24-CMP-01211/1839640/1 ] 13 01/17/24 PL20240000400 Words underlined are additions; Words 4paek +hre„rth are deletions. Page 2 of 2 Packet Pg. 533 9.A.3.b Exhibit A COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT Potable Water Sub -Element OBJECTIVE 1: [Page 2] Locate and develop potable water supply sources to meet the future needs of the County owned and operated systems, said supply sources meeting the minimum Level of Service Standards established by this Plan. The development and utilization of new potable water supply sources and the acquisition of land necessary for such development shall be based upon the information, guidelines and procedures identified within the County's Ten -Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan (as updated), and the Lower West Coast Water Supply Plan prepared by the South Florida Water Management District. Policy 1.7: The County has developed the Ten -Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan, dated FebruaFy 2019 January 2024, in accordance with the water supply guidelines of the most current version of the South Florida Water Management District's Lower West Coast Water Supply Plan. The County's Ten -Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan is incorporated herein by reference. [remainder of this page intentionally left blank] [24-CMP-01211/1839977/1]Words underlined are added; words StF G", thre unh are deletions. ******** ******** indicates a break in text P Packet Pg. 534 9.A.3.b CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT OBJECTIVE 1: (PUBLIC FACILITY LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS) [Page 2] Identify and define types of public facilities, establish standards for levels of service for each such public facility, and determine what quantity of additional public facilities is needed in order to achieve and maintain the standards. Policy 1.5: [Page 5] The standards for levels of service of public facilities shall be as follows: D. County Potable Water Systems: [Page 6] County Water District = 4-59130 gallons per capita per day (gpcd) E. County Sanitary Sewer - Wastewater Treatment Systems: Se utfa �Afastev.xate.r TreAtm p pt ServiEe UP A - 100 ba„eRs per Ea p itaper dayTgpedT Wastewater Treatment Service Area = 90 gallons per capita per day (gpcd) [remainder of this page intentionally left blank] [24-CMP-01211/1839977/1]Words underlined are added; words StF G", thre unh are deletions. ******** ******** indicates a break in text P Packet Pg. 535 9.A.3.c COLLIER COUNTY 10-YEAR WATER SUPPLY FACILITIES WORK PLAN UPDATE 2023 to 2033 Prepared For: COLLIER COUNTY Public Utilities Department Engineering & Project Management Division 3339 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 303 Naples, Florida 34112-5361 Prepared By: ENGINEERING 2122 Johnson Street Fort Myers, Florida 33901 (239) 334-0046 E B 642 January 2024 Packet Pg. 536 9.A.3.c EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of the Collier County 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update (Work Plan) is to identify and plan for the water supply sources and facilities needed to serve existing and new development within the Collier County jurisdiction. Chapter 163, Part II, F.S., requires local governments to prepare and adopt Work Plans into their comprehensive plans within 18 months after the applicable water management district approves a regional water supply plan or its update for a region. The 2022 Lower West Coast Water Supply Plan (LWCWSP) Update was approved by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) on Decemb 8, 2022. The 2022 SFWMD LWCWSP Update covers Lee and Collier Counties, as wel JNrtions of Hendry, Glades, and Charlotte Counties; Collier County is located within the ning area fo LWCWSP. Collier County is comprised of incorporated and uninco ted areas in southwest Florida. Within Collier County, both public and private utilityroviders main service areas in which water and wastewater services are provided. The utilities identified within Collier County include Collier County Water -Sewer District, Imfnokalee Water and Sewer District, Ave Maria Utility Company, Everglades City, City of les, it of Marco Island, and the Port of the Islands Community Improvement District. T it of N les, the City of Marco Island, and Everglades City are local City government and are subject to Chapter 163, F.S. Therefore, these local governments are responsible for completing an independent Work Plan which incorporates the 2022 SFWMD LWCWSP Update. Based on the obligation to complete Work Plans separate from Collier County, these local governments have been excluded from the Collier County Work Plan evaluation. The purpose of this Work Plan is to update the previous 2019 Collier County Water Supply Facilities Work Plan and considers a planning period of 2023 through 2033 for concurrency with updates to the 2023 Collier County Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) adopted December 12, 2023 and Comprehensive Plan and the SFWMD 18-month local government adoption requirement. The Packet Pg. 537 9.A.3.c population estimates and projections used in this Work Plan consider incorporated and unincorporated Collier County as a whole and the incorporated and unincorporated areas served by County Sewer - Water District, Immokalee Water -Sewer District, Ave Maria Utility Company, and Port of the Islands Community Improvement District service areas. Based on the analyses herein, the utility providers included in this Work Plan will have and/or have planned adequate water treatment plant capacity and permitted allocations from the SFWMD through the planning period to serve anticipated populations. This Work Plan identifies several capital improvement projects planned over the next five years to support continuous water supply to the areas served at of service standard) and projects to upgrade wastewater trea water capacity and distribution. capita demands (i.e., level and increase reclaimed An assessment of existing Goals, Objectives, and Policies (GOPs) in Collier County' comprehensive plan was performed in preparation of the Wof Plan to idemefy those that address water supply sources and facilities, as well as conservation andye programs. This Work Plan will be adopted as a standalon cument incorporated into the Collier County Comprehensive Plan b} ►d II Packet Pg. 538 9.A.3.c TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVESUMMARY......................................................................................................... I ACRONYMLIST....................................................................................................................... V 1.0 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................... I 1.1 Statutory History.................................................................................................. 2 1.2 Statutory Requirements....................................................................................... 2 2.0 BACKGROUND AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT OVERVIEW .................................. 5 3.0 DATA AND ANALYSIS............................................................................................... 9 3.1 Population Information........................................................................................ 9 3.2 Population by Utility............................................................................................ 9 3.3 Current and Future Areas Served........................................................................ 11 3.4 Level of Service Standard .................................................................................. 11 3.5 Population and Potable Water Deman jecti ns............................................ 12 3.6 Facility Capacity Analysis for Projecte atewemands................................. 13 3.7 Populations Served by Domestic elf-Supply(S).......................................... 19 3.8 Agricultural, Landscape/Recrea d Commercial/Industrial Water De ds.............................................................. 21 3.9 Power Generation Supply Deman................................................................ 22 3.10 Water Supply Provided by Other En ies........................................................... 22 3.11 Potential Future Water Suppliers......................................................................... 22 3.12 Conservation and Reuse Efforts.......................................................................... 22 7 4.0 REGIONAL W R SUPPLY ISSUES....................................................................... 29 5.0 ALTERNAVIE WATER SUPPLY................................................................................. 30 6.0 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS....................................................................................... 32 7.0 GOALS, OBJECTIVES, POLICIES............................................................................... 34 8.0 REFERENCES............................................................................................................... 39 Q III Packet Pg. 539 9.A.3.c LIST OF TABLES Number 1 County -Wide Population Projections for Permanent Residents in Collier County............. 9 2 Current and Projected Permanent Resident Populations by Utility...............................11 3 Potable Water Demand Projections.................................................................. 12 4.1 CCWSD Raw Water Supply Wellfields and Storage .............................................. 14 4.2 CCWSD Facility Capacity Analysis for Projected Finished Water Demands ................. 14 5.1 IWSD Raw Water Supply Wellfields and Storage .................................................. 15 5.2 IWSD Facility Capacity Analysis for Projected Finished Water Demands .................... 15 6.1 AMUC Raw Water Supply Wellfield and Storage..................................................17 6.2 AMUC Facility Capacity Analysis for Projected Finished Water Demands....................17 7.1 Port of the Islands CID Raw Water Supply Wellfield and Storage ............................. 18 7.2 Port of the Islands CID Facility Capacity Analysis for Projected Finished WaterDemands.........................................................................................19 8 Population Served by FDEP Potable Water Systems (PWS) 2 ............................. 20 9 Agricultural, Landscape/Recreational, and Commercial/I trial Water Demand Projections.............................................................. 21 10 Water Treatment Facilities and Reclaimed Water Distribution.. ........................ 28 112022 LWCWSP Capital Improvement Projects. ........ 32 12 Capital Improvement Projects Update...........,............................................... 33 LIST OF FIGURES r 1 — Current and Future Water Service Areas 2A — Existing and Proposed CCWSD Production Wields 2B — Existing and Proposed IWSD and AMUC Production Wellfields 2C — Existing Port of the I ds CID Pro tion Wellfield 3 — Current and Future tewater Servic reas 4 — Existing Reclaimed Water Lines an Wastewater Treatment Facilities APPENDICES Appendix A — Interlocal Agreement between CCWSD and the City of Naples Appendix B — Agreement for Potable Water Service Calusa Island Village (Goodland Area) Appendix C — Agreement for Potable and Emergency Water Interconnects between Bonita Springs Utilities, Inc. and CCWSD Appendix D - Interlocal Agreement between CCWSD and the Big Cypress Stewardship District (Town of Big Cypress) Appendix E — Interlocal Agreement between CCWSD and the Big Cypress Stewardship District (Bellmar Village) Appendix F - Interlocal Agreement between CCWSD and the Big Cypress Stewardship District (Rivergrass Village) Appendix G — Capital Improvement Schedules IV Packet Pg. 540 9.A.3.c AMUC ASR AUIR BEBR BSU CCWSD CID DSS FDEP F.A.C. F.S. GOP GPD GPDPC ID IQ IWSD LHA LOS LTA LWC LWCWSP MDL MHA MG MGD NESA PWS RO RWDS RWSP SAS SFWMD TDS UIC UFA UFAS WRF WTA WTP WUP WWTF WWTP ACRONYM LIST Ave Maria Utility Company Aquifer Storage and Recovery Annual Update and Inventory Report Bureau of Economic and Business Research Bonita Springs Utilities Collier County Water -Sewer District Community Improvement District Domestic Self -Supply Florida Department of Environmental Protection Florida Administrative Code Florida Statutes Goals, Objectives, and Policies Gallons Per Day Gallons Per Day Per Capita Identification Irrigation Quality Immokalee Water and Sewer Distri Lower Hawthorn Aquifer Level of Service Lower Tamiami Aquifer Lower West Coast Lower West Coastyater Suppl an Maximum Developable Limit Mid -Hawthorn Aquifer Million Gallons Million Gallons Per Day Northeast Expansion Service Area Potable Water System Reverse Osmosis 7 Reclaimed Water Distribution System Regional Water Supply Plan Surficial Aquifer System South Florida Water Management District Total Dissolved Solids Underground Injection Control Upper Floridan Aquifer Upper Floridan Aquifer System Water Reclamation Facility Water Table Aquifer Water Treatment Plant Water Use Permit Wastewater Treatment Facility Wastewater Treatment Plant u Packet Pg. 541 9.A.3.c Collier County 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update January 2024 Collier County Public Utilities 1.0 INTRODUCTION The purpose of the Collier County 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update (Work Plan) is to identify and plan for the water supply sources and facilities needed to serve existing and new development within the local government's jurisdiction. Chapter 163, Part II, F.S., requires local governments to prepare and adopt Work Plans into their comprehensive plans within 18 months after the water management district approves a regional water supply plan (RWSP) or its update. The Lower West Coast Water Supply Plan Update (LWCWSP) was approved by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) on December 8, 2022. Therefore, the deadline for local governments within the amend their comprehensive plans with an adopted Work This Work Plan for Collier County is divided i Section 1 — Introduction Section 2 — Background and Local Government Section 3 — Data and Analysis Section 4 — Regional Water Supply Issues Section 5 — Alternative Water Supply N Section 6 — Capital Improvem4W& Section 7 — Goals, Section 8 — References Johnson Engineering, West Coast Planning Area to June 8, 2024. I repared this Work Plan based on information obtained from government entities and other parties. While Johnson Engineering has used reasonable care to avoid reliance upon faulty or incomplete information, Johnson Engineering is not responsible for verifying the accuracy of all data and information provided by these governmental entities and other parties. 1 Packet Pg. 542 9.A.3.c Collier County 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update January 2024 Collier County Public Utilities 1.1 Statutory History The Florida Legislature enacted bills in the 2002, 2004, 2005 and 2011 sessions to address the state's water supply needs. These bills, especially Senate Bills 360 and 444 (2005 legislative session), significantly changed Chapter 163 and 373 Florida Statutes (F.S.) by strengthening the statutory links between the regional water supply plans prepared by water management districts and comprehensive plans prepared by local governments. In addition, these bills established the basis for improving coordination between local land use planning and water supply planning. 1.2 Statutory Requirements Each local government must comply with t4+llowing 1. Coordinate appropriate aspects of its comprehensive plan with the applicable RWSP [Section 163.3177`4)(a), F.S.]. 2. Ensure that its future land e pl seY Pon availability of adequate water supplies and pu�acilit and services [Section 163.3177(6)(a), F.S., effective JuIZ 1, 2005JF_DatallWd analysis demonstrating that adequate water supplies and associated public facilities will be available to meet projected gro demands m,*ccompany all proposed Future Land Use Plan and Plan a ments submitted for review. Ad 3. In consultation with the water supplier, ensure adequate water supplies and potable water facilities are available to serve new development no later than the issuance by the local government of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent [Section 163.3180(2), F.S.]. 4. For local governments subject to a RWSP, revise the General Sanitary Sewer, Solid Waste, Drainage, Potable Water, and Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Element (the "Infrastructure element") through a Comprehensive Plan amendment to: a. Identify and incorporate the alternative water supply project(s) selected by the local government from projects identified in the applicable RWSP, or 2 Packet Pg. 543 9.A.3.c Collier County 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update January 2024 Collier County Public Utilities alternative project(s) proposed by the local government under Section 373.709(8)(b), F.S. [Section 163.3177(6)(c), F.S.]; b. Identify the traditional and alternative water supply projects and the conservation and reuse programs necessary to meet water needs identified in the applicable RWSP [Section 163.3177(6)(c)3., F.S.]; and c. Update Work Plan for at least a 10-year planning period for constructing the public, private, and regional water supply facilities identified in the element as necessary to serve existing and new development. [Section 163.3177(6)(c), F.S.] 5. Revise the Five -Year Schedule of Capital Im vements to include water supply, reuse, and conservation projects and programs to be implemented during the 5-year period [Section 163.3177(3)(a)4., F 6. To the extent necessary to maintail%illIFnal consistency after making changes described in Paragraph 1 Ih 5 a�revise the Conservation element to assess projected water nee and sources for at least a 10-year planning period, considering the applicable RWSP and water use permit(s) [Section 163.3177(6)(d), i F.S.]. The co rehensive lan must address the water supply sources necessary to PT meet the existi d proje water use demand for the established planning pen plicable RWSP [Section 163.3167(9), F.S.]. 7. Tssary to maintain internal consistency after making changes 1 through 5 above, revise the Intergovernmental Coordination Element to ensure coordination of the comprehensive plan with applicable regional water supply plans and regional water supply authorities' plans. [Section 163.3177(6)(h)l., F.S.]. 8. Local governments are required to comprehensively evaluate and update the Comprehensive Plan to reflect changes in local conditions every seven years. The evaluation could address the local government's need to update their Work Plan, including the development of alternative water supplies, and determine whether the identified alternative water supply projects, traditional water supply projects, and 3 Packet Pg. 544 9.A.3.c Collier County 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update Collier County Public Utilities January 2024 conservation and reuse programs are meeting local water use demands [Section 163.3191(3), F.S.]. 9. Local governments may be exempt from updating their Work Plan if they meet certain criteria. A local government that does not own, operate, or maintain its own water supply facilities and is served by a public water supply entity with a permitted allocation of 300 million gallons per day or greater is not required to amend its Comprehensive Plan when an RWSP is updated if the local government uses less than 1 percent of the public water supply entity's total permitted allocation. However, the local government must cooperate with the public water supply entity that provides service within its jurisdiction and keep the Sanitary Sewer, Solid Waste, Drainage, Potable Water, and N roundwater Aquifer Recharge element up to date, pursuant to Section P6 .3191, A local government should contact the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO) to verify its qualifications for the exemption [Section 163.3177(6)(c)4., F.S.]. 10. Local governments with a Sector Plan adopted in accordance with Section 163.3245, F.S., should incorporate information from the adopted Sector Plan, Master Plan, andkDeai Specific Area Plan into the Work Plan. The focus should be on water d resource development, conservation measures, and inter oordination activities with the SFWMD and water supply developmeN16 ded to address projected development in the Sector Plan area [fictio245, F.S.]. (section intentionally left blank) 4 Packet Pg. 545 9.A.3.c Collier County 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update January 2024 Collier County Public Utilities 2.0 BACKGROUND AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT OVERVIEW Collier County is comprised of incorporated and unincorporated areas. Within Collier County, both public and private utility providers maintain service areas in which water and wastewater services are provided. Based on review of the water and wastewater services within Collier County, the following utility providers were identified: • Collier County Water -Sewer District; • Immokalee Water -Sewer District; • Ave Maria Utility Company; • Everglades City; • City of Naples Utilities; • City of Marco Island Utilities; and • Port of the Islands. Below are brief descriptions of these n (OVtilityNseice areas within Collier County. 2.1 Water and Wastewater Utility Providers within Collier County 2.1.1 Collie�ounty Water ewer District (CCWSD) The of approximately 261 square miles for potab us hile its current wastewater service area encompasses a ximately sq are miles which extend into north, east, and south Collier Coun ith s e areas extending into southeast City of Naples service area, Stevens Landing, Goodland and Key Marco. CCWSD maintains the interconnections with Bonita Springs Utilities and the City of Naples which are maintained for emergency use. The area served is constantly growing within the boundary of the CCWSD. Generally, the service area is bounded on the north by Lee County, to the south- southwest by the City of Marco Island city limits and the Gulf of Mexico, to the west by the City of Naples city limits and the Gulf of Mexico, and on the east by the Urban Planning Boundary. Notable expansions within the CCWSD service area include the Northeast Expansion Area (MESA) in 2018 to accommodate organic growth of the service area, the acquisition of the Golden 5 Packet Pg. 546 9.A.3.c Collier County 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update January 2024 Collier County Public Utilities Gate City water and wastewater systems in 2018, and the execution of agreements with the Big Cypress Stewardship District for potable water, sanitary sewer, and injection quality (IQ) water services for all County - approved projects for the Town of Big Cypress, Bellmar Village, and Rivergrass Village in 2023. Applicable agreements are provided in Appendices A through F. 2.1.2 Immokalee Water -Sewer District (IWSD) IWSD is an Independent Special District of the State of Florida that was created on July 5, 1978, by an Act of the Florida Legislature to provide water and sewer services in Immokalee. The IWSD servic ea covers approximately 107 square miles in Collier County and is n the north and west by Lee County, to the east by unincorporat�ollier Co ands, and to the south by unincorporated Collier County lands and Immokalee Road. 2.1.3 Ave Maria Utility Company (AMUC) The Ave Maria Stewardship C� ommmunity District was created in 2004, Chapter 2004-461, Lawsnthe da. Al'AtC7C provides water and wastewater to a service area compri rox1te 5,000-acre Ave Maria community located in eastern unin orporated C ier County. The AMUC service area is generally bou o t rth�mmokalee Road, to the east by unincorporated Collier Co lands, to �he south by Oil Well Road, and to the west by Big Cypress Stewa ip District. 2.1.4 Everglades City The Everglades City service area includes Everglades City, Chokoloskee Island, and Copeland. Everglades City encompasses approximately 1.5 square miles and is surrounded by Everglades National Park; Chokoloskee Island encompasses 0.23 square miles and is located within the Chokoloskee Bay, southeast of Tamiami Trail East. The Copeland portion of the Everglades City service area is comprised of a few parcels associated with the Fakahatchee Strand Preserve Park Offices and the Everglades City public water supply system wellfield located northeast of Tamiami Trail East and west of the State 6 Packet Pg. 547 9.A.3.c Collier County 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update January 2024 Collier County Public Utilities Route 29. The residential area of Copeland is served by Collier County Utility Company (formerly known as the Lee Cypress Water and Sewer Co-op, Inc.), operated by U.S. Water Services Corporation which is accounted for in the population served by domestic self -supply. In addition to these portions of the service area, the most -recent SFWMD water use permit modification (permit No. 11-00160-W) indicates the Everglades City service area includes Plantation Island, located southeast of Everglades City and Carnestown, located south of the intersection of Tamiami Trail East and State Route 29. 2.1.5 City of Naples Utilities The City of Naples Utility Department strvice area is comprised of approximately 33 square miles for potable r and 18.6 square miles for wastewater services generally bounA the west b e Gulf of Mexico, to the north by Pine Ridge Road and to the south by Keewaydin Island. The service area extends east into unincorpora areas of Collier County as far as Livingston Road. 2.1.6 City of?aries sland Utilities The City of cod service area is predominantly limited to areas within the corporate o e City of Marco Island and areas in adjacent unincorpora reas � Collier County, previously served by the Florida Water Services Corpo tion. The service area provides potable water to CCWSD under ter 1 agreement for distribution to the Stevens Landing, Goodland and Key co areas. The City of Marco Island service area is bound to the north by the Big Marco Pass, to the east by Whiskey Creek Drive, to the south by Caxambas Pass, and to the west by the Gulf of Mexico. 2.1.7 Port of the islands Community Improvement District (CID) The Port of the Islands CID service area is located in southern Collier County and is comprised of an approximate 0.5 square mile residential community with various amenities and a hotel. The community is surrounded by the Picayune Strand State Park and the Ten Thousand Island National Wildlife Reserve. The service area is situated directly north and south of Tamiami Trail East. 7 Packet Pg. 548 9.A.3.c Collier County 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update January 2024 Collier County Public Utilities The City of Naples, the City of Marco Island, and Everglades City are local City governments and are subject to Chapter 163, F.S. Therefore, these local governments are responsible for completing an independent Work Plan which incorporates the 2022 SFWMD LWCWSP. Based on the obligation to complete Work Plans separate from Collier County, these local governments have been excluded from the Collier County Work Plan evaluation. In addition to the abovementioned water and wastewater utility providers, areas of incorporated and unincorporated Collier County have several private water supply systems regulated by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) which provide less than 100,000 gallons annually a erve less than 10,000 residents within Collier County. Furthermore, domestic er ly systems exist throughout Collier County, but only account for a al of the C*nty-wide potable water demand. A majority of the current popu on is Ahm utility provider service areas. This Work Plan includes an evaVtionCCWSD, AMUC,IWSD, and Port of the Islands CID potable water capacirowh within these service areas of Collier County over the 10-yeainInformation used in compiling the Work Plan include the 20112 SFWMD LW(VSP, the 2019 Collier County 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan, the"M*Collier County AUIR, and applicable SFWMD and Florid partment of�vironmental Protection (FDEP) permits and databases. Populatio timates and projections used in this Work Plan are based on values provided in the 20 Collier County AUIR adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on Oecember 12, 2023, which were developed using the Bureau of Economic and Business Research (BEBR), Projections of Florida Population by County, 2025-2050, with Estimates for 2022 (Volume 56, Bulletin 195, April 2023, medium range), supplemented using data from Metro Forecasting Models, LLC and the Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section. The water supply demand estimates and projections were based on existing utility -specific SFWMD public water supply water use permits, FDEP water treatment facility capacities, and potable water level of service standards provided in 2022 SFWMD LWCWSP. The data herein has been provided to and verified by IWSD, AMUC, and Port of the Islands CID in preparation of this Work Plan. 8 Packet Pg. 549 9.A.3.c Collier County 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update Collier County Public Utilities 3.0 DATA AND ANALYSIS 3.1 Population Information January 2024 Population projections used in this Work Plan are based on the 2023 Collier County AUIR estimates and projections which were determined using the BEBR, Projections of Florida Population by County, 2025-2050, with Estimates for 2022 (Volume 56, Bulletin 195, April 2023). Populations provided for the BEBR medium range are anticipated to have the highest probability of occurrence; therefore, the medium range projection for the planning period is considered most representative and was used in this Work Plan. The County -wide population projections are provided below in Table 1 — County -Wide Population Projections fo ermanent Residents in Collier County. Table 1— County -Wide POpulation Proiections for Permanent Residents in Collier Countv DATA SOURCE 2023 2028 2033 2023 Collier County AUIR' 400,257 428,595 452,606 ' Projected County -wide permanent population on October 1, 2023, is 400,257. ThisAojection is extrapolated from the April 1, 2022, estimate 390,912 provided in the BEBR, Projections of Florida Population by County, 20�6-2050 (volume 56, Bulletin 195, April 2023) supplemented using data from Metro Forecasting Models, LLglgol�jhe Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section. 3.2 Population till The utility pr in lier County each have unique population considerations; therefore, follows ec s identify these considerations. 3.2.1 ollier unty Water and Sewer District (CCWSD) The CCW30 service area extends through the majority of north and south- southeast unincorporated Collier County with areas in southeast incorporated Naples. CCWSD has planned expansions in the Northeast Service Area (MESA) which will include villages and areas of Big Cypress Stewardship District (Town of Big Cypress, Bellmar, and Rivergrass), the adjacent SkySail subdivision, Immokalee Road Rural Village, and Brightshore Village. In addition, CCWSD is actively working on a project to convert domestic self - supply users in Golden Gate City to potable water; therefore, only a portion of the population is served, and the additional customers do not reflect growth of the service area, but an increase in population served. Presently, additional 6 Packet Pg. 550 9.A.3.c Collier County 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update Collier County Public Utilities January 2024 water customers are being connected on an individual basis where existing infrastructure exists or when new water mains are installed. Based on the estimated population projections, an approximate 11-percent increase in population served is anticipated from 2023 to 2033. The population projections include current service areas and the planned expansions over the planning period. 3.2.2 Immokalee Water and Sewer District (IWSD) The IWSD service area is comprised of land primarily dedicated to agricultural production. The service area does not currentlyigticipate significant population increases over the 10-year planning horizogMt the potential for growth exists. Potential factors which could result inyciulati3&Vcreases include residential, commercial, and industrial developments within thr� vice area. Based on the estimated population projectiols, an 4k#pproximate 4-percent increase in population served is anticipated from023 to 2033. IWSD is currently in planning haws for oten al i e�Its of the water treatment facilities p gp p but is anticipatgEl0TMP-1,begi% in 2031; therefore, improvements would be considered i 3.2.3 A&6MdWtility Company (AMUC) The 'AMUC se{vicZVarea is comprised of an approximate 5,000-acre � 1 community. The population growth is limited to expansions of residential and commercia4vrevelopments within the community limits until buildout is achieved and/or new land is acquired for expansion of the community. Based on the estimated population projections, an approximate 147-percent increase in population served is anticipated from 2023 to 2033. AMUC is currently working on water treatment and wastewater treatment facilities improvement projects to meet projected future demands that are addressed in this Work Plan. 3.2.4 Port of the Islands Community Improvement District (CID) The Port of the Islands CID service area is comprised of an approximate 0.5 square mile residential community with various amenities and a hotel. The 10 Packet Pg. 551 9.A.3.c Collier County 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update January 2024 Collier County Public Utilities community is surrounded by the Picayune Strand State Park and the Ten Thousand Island National Wildlife Reserve. Based on the physical setting of these service areas, growth and the potential for growth is limited to the geographic extent of this service area. Based on the population projections provided by Hole Montes, Inc., which includes planned development upon build -out of the vacant properties, and the 58-acre redevelopment site currently owned by the local and County governments, an approximate 37-percent increase in population is anticipated from 2023 to 2033. Table 2 — Current and Proiected Permanent Resident Populations by Utility Utility Provider 2023 2028 2033 Population in CCWSD' 236,636 250,782 262,483 Population in IWSDZ 25,08 25,641 26,101 Population in AMUC3 9,AV 16,577 24,552 Population in Port of the Islands CID 1,130 1,300 1,550 Total 272,804 294,300 314,686 1 Source: 2023 Collier County AUIR, Appendix I, County Water District Population Estimates and Projections as of October 1. Projected populations derived using BEBR, Projections of Florida Population by Coun�025-2050 (Volume 56, Bulletin 195, April 2023) supplemented using data from Metro Forecasting Models, LLC, the Collier Coun mprehensive Planning Section, and 2010 Census & 2020 Census. z Source: 2023 Collier County AUIR, Appendix I, Permanent Populati stim and Projections as of October 1 for Immokalee Planning Community. 'Population projections provided by AMUC A. 12024. ° Population estimates are based on Porto Islands CID Population Projections [2020 thru 2040], prepared by Hole Montes, Inc., which includes planned development upon buil of the rtielWand the 58-acre redevelopment site currently owned by the local and County governments. 3.3 Cdffent and Mure1kreas Served A map depictirWurrffand proposed service area boundaries is shown in Figure 1. At the time of this eAVation, no changes were identified throughout the planning horizon that would result in short-term increases in population that would require increases in potable water demand not already permitted and/or planned. Organic growth is anticipated to continue within utility service area boundaries throughout the planning horizon. 3.4 Level of Service Standard The potable water level of service standards adopted by the utilities are concurrent with the 2022 LWCWSP. Each standard is based on the utility's current potable water demands and future potable water demands which allows the utility to evaluate current 11 Packet Pg. 552 Collier County 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update Collier County Public Utilities 9.A.3.c January 2024 and future infrastructure capacities to meet potable water demand through the 10-year planning horizon considered in this Work Plan. The potable water level of service (LOS) standard for each utility is provided below. All potable water LOS are consistent with the 2022 LWCSP. CCWSD maintains the accuracy of their LOS by evaluating population and flow data over a 10-year period. • CCWSD: 130 gallons per day per capita (gpdpc) IWSD: 89 gpdpc AMUC: 89 gpdpc Port of the Islands CID: 85 gpdpc The wastewater LOS per the utilities is accuracy of their LOS by evaluating popul • CCWSD: 90 gpdpc • IWSD: 73 gpdpc • AMUC: 13::ndstPd dp • Port of the 3.5 Population and Potafe Watl,Di CCWSD maintains the Projections over a 10-year period. Potable water demand pr(rections for the utility providers included in this Work Plan were determined by multiplying the population by the potable water level of service standard and tility-specific peak factors, provided in SFWMD public water supply water use permits. The projections are provided below in Table 3 — Potable Water Demand Projections. Table 3 — Potable Water Demand Proiections Utility Provider gpdpc 2023 2028 2033 Population Demand (MGD) Population Demand (MGD) Population Demand (MGD) Population in CCSWD 130 236,636 30.76 250,782 32.60 262,483 34.12 Population in IWSD 89 25,086 2.23 25,641 2.28 26,101 2.32 Population in AMUC 89 9,952 0.89 16,577 1.48 24,552 2.19 Population in by Port of the Islands CID 85 1,130 0.10 1,300 0.11 1,550 0.13 Total 272,804 33.98 294,300 36.47 314,686 38.76 gpdpc = Gallons per day per capita MGD = Million Gallons per Day 12 Packet Pg. 553 9.A.3.c Collier County 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update January 2024 Collier County Public Utilities 3.6 Raw Water Supply Facilities and Facility Capacity Analysis for Projected Water Demands The facility raw water supply and capacity analysis for projected water demands were determined based on data collected from the 2022 LWCWSP, the 2023 Collier County AUIR, SFWMD public water supply permits and FDEP public supply operating capacities. 3.6.1 Collier County Water -Sewer District (CCWSD) CCWSD maintains two (2) SFWMD public supply water use permits (11 00249-W and 11-00419-W) which expire i December 2037 and February 2027, respectively. CCWSD is currently wo ing to update these permits. CCWSD operates four (4) wellfields t with aw water from the Lower Tamiami aquifer (LTA), the Mid- awthorn aquife MHA), and the Lower Hawthorn aquifer (LHA, i.e., uppermost portion of the Upper Floridan aquifer (UFA)) for maximum annual locations of 19.527 million gallons (MG) (11- 00249-W) and 775.95 MG (11-0041W�The SFWMD allocations included in the analysis consider to account plann ie area expansions and increase in demand. Included thisfysis is the Northeast County Regional Water Treatment Plant whichpos n increase of 10 million gallons per day (MGD) of capacity for the CCWSD service area by fiscal year 2033. Based on'Wesults of this analysis, sufficient water supply through the 10- year planning period exists and/or is planned to meet population projections. CCWSD plans to renew existing water use permits to maintain permitted raw water supply to meet potable water demands. Summary tables are provided on the next page for the water treatment plant (WTP) wellfields and raw water supply and analysis for the utility service area are provided in Table 4.1 — CCWSD Raw Water Supply Wellfields and Storage and Table 4.2 - CCWSD Facility Capacity Analysis for Projected Finished Water Demands. The existing and proposed CCWSD wellfields are depicted in Figure 2A - Existing and Proposed CCWSD Production Wellfields. 13 Packet Pg. 554 9.A.3.c Collier County 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update January 2024 Collier County Public Utilities Table 4.1 - CCWSD Raw Water Supply Wellfields and Storage Detail Aquifer Source Lower Tamiami Mid -Hawthorn Lower Hawthorn SFWMD Allocation (MGD) 28.63 1.33 19.52 Water Quality Fresh Brackish Brackish Total Permitted Wells 64 46 42 Potable Water Storage Tank Capacity (MG) 38.75 Wellfields permitted under SFWMD WUP No(s). 11-00249-W and 11-00419-W (North and South Reverse Osmosis, NESA, and Golden Gate). Table 4.2 - CCWSD Facility Capacity Analysis for Projected Finished Water Demands Permanent Resident Population Projections 2023 2028 2033 236,636 250,782 262,483 Finished Water Demand per Capita (GPD) 130 130 130 Finished Water Avg. Daily Demand (MGD)' 0.76 32.60 34.12 Available Facility Capacity (MGD)l 50.00 50.00 60.00 Facility Capacity Surplus (MGD) 19.24 17.40 25.88 Raw Water SFWMD Allocation (MGD)* 55.63 55.63 65.633 Raw Water Avg. Daily Demand (MGD)** 35.38 37.49 39.24 Raw Water Permitted Surplus (MGD) 20.25 18.14 24.39 GPD = Gallons per Day MGD = Million Gallons per Day Water supply demand determined by multiplying popu tion by 1 of service standard. 2 Value based on FDEP PWS ID No. 5114069 design car . and tracting 2 MGD which equates to potentially lost capacity during maintenance of a system during peak demand (52 MGD - 2 MGD = 50.00 MGD). 3 Increased Raw Water SFW ns were etermmed based on the ongoing expansion of treatment capacity related to the Northeast Expansion Area. * Permitted allocations w water under SFWM No(s). 11-00249-W and 11-00419-W. ** Raw water demands etermined using utility -specific raw -to -finished water ratio of 1.15, provided in the 2022 LWCWSP. Bulk sales available to Bon rings Utility (BSU), completed via emergency connect (minimal, approximately 74 GPD). 3.6.2 Immokalee Water -Sewer District (IWSD) IWSD maintains SFWMD public supply water use permit No. 11-00013-W which expires in May 2031. IWSD operates three wellfields which withdraw raw water from the LTA and is permitted for one (1) wellfield proposed for the UFA for a maximum annual allocation of 1,515 MG. Previously, IWSD proposed the use of the UFA wellfield, but is exploring alternative water supply for the proposed wellfield. The SFWMD allocations included in the analysis consider the current permitted allocations. 14 Packet Pg. 555 9.A.3.c Collier County 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update January 2024 Collier County Public Utilities Based on the results of this analysis, sufficient water supply exists through the 10-year planning period to meet population projections; it is assumed IWSD will renew the existing water use permit and/or modify to meet projected demands prior to the expiration of the existing public water supply permit. Summary tables for the WTP wellfields and raw water supply and analysis for the utility service area are provided in Table 5.1 — IWSD Raw Water Supply Wellfields and Storage and Table 5.2 - IWSD Facility Capacity Analysis for Projected Finished Water Demands. The existing and proposed IWSD wellfield areas are depicted in Figure 2B - Existing and Proposed ISWD and AMUC Production Wellfields. Table 5.1 - IWSD Raw Water SADDIV Wellfields and Storm Detail Aquifer S cc Lower Tamiami Upper Floridan SFWMD Allocation (MGD) 3.45 Proposed Water Quality Fresh Brackish Total Permitted Wells 19 4 Potable Water Storage Tank Capacity (MG) 3.75 Wellfields permitted under SFWMD WUP No. 11-00013-W (Carson Road, J.V. Warden, Airport, and Upper Floridan). 4 Table 5.2 - IWSD Facility Capacity Analysis for Projected Finished Water Demands Permane side opulation Projections 2023 2028 2033 25,086 25,641 26,101 Finished Water Demand per Mita (GPD) 89.00 89.00 89.00 Finished Water Avg. Daily Demand (MGD) 2.23 2.28 2.32 Available Facility Capacity (MGD)' 5.64 5.64 5.64 Facility Capacity Surplus (MGD) 3.41 3.36 3.32 Raw Water SFWMD Allocation (MGD)' 4.15 4.15 4.15 Raw Water Avg. Daily Demand (MGD)3 2.25 2.30 2.35 Raw Water Permitted Surplus (MGD) 1.90 1.85 1.80 GPD = Gallons per Day MGD = Million Gallons per Day 'Value based on FDEP PWS ID 5110142 design capacity. a Permitted allocations for raw water under SFWMD WUP No. 11-00013-W. s Raw water demands were determined using utility -specific raw -to -finished water ratio of 1.01, provided in the 2022 LWCWSP. 15 Packet Pg. 556 9.A.3.c Collier County 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update Collier County Public Utilities January 2024 3.6.3 Ave Maria Utility Company (AMUC)AMUC maintains SFWMD public supply water use permit No. 11-02298-W which expires in March 2026. AMUC operates one wellfield which withdraws raw water from the LTA with two (2) proposed Sandstone aquifer (SSA) production wells for a maximum annual allocation of 404.12 million gallons (MG). The SFWMD allocations included in the analysis consider the current permitted allocations. Based on the results of this analysis, sufficient water supply currently exists, but as indicated by the raw water permitted deficit, modifications to the existing water use permit to increase allocations will be required to meet estimated demands through the 10-year planning peri0o# AMUC proposes a WTP expansion to itional 2.76 MGD capacity by 2031; therefore, proactive meastWs are being taR♦to address the projected deficits. In addition, the peak f ded in the finished water demand provides a conservative estimate for nds which are likely to be below what is projected in the analysis; the emoving the peak factor for the 1 projection demonstrates that AIVIUC is within required treatment capacity to meet the pr ' ted populatilorowth for 2028 with a permitted raw water surplus of 0.0 MGD. Summary tables for the WTP wellfields and raw water nc ysis fithe utility service area are provided on the next page in 1 — AMUC Raw Water Supply Wellfield and Storage and Table 6.2 - AMUO%Lcili y Capacity Analysis for Projected Finished Water Demands. The existing an7proposed AMUC wellfield is depicted in Figure 2B - Existing and Proposed IWSD and AMUC Production Wellfields. (section intentionally left blank) 16 Packet Pg. 557 9.A.3.c Collier County 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update January 2024 Collier County Public Utilities Table 6.1 - AMUC Raw Water Supply Wellfield and Storage Detail Aquifer Source Lower Tamiami Sandstone SFWMD Allocation (MGD) 1.11 Proposed Water Quality Fresh Fresh Total Permitted Wells 3 2 Potable Water Storage Tank Capacity (MG) 1.5 Note: Wellfield permitted under SFWMD WUP No. 11-02298-W. Table 6.2 - AMUC Facility Capacity Analysis for Projected Finished Water Demands Permanent Resident Population Projections r 2023 2028 2033 . 9,952 16,577 24,552 Finished Water Demand per Capita (GPD) 89.00 89.00 89.00 Finished Water Avg. Daily Demand (MGD) Or0.89 1.48 2.19 Available Facility Capacity (MGD)' 4E 1.67 2.5 4.63 Facility Capacity Surplus (MGD) 0.78 1.02 2.44 Raw Water SFWMD Allocation (MGD)' 1.11 1.11 1.11 Raw Water Avg. Daily Demand (MGD)' i; 1.12 1.87 2.78 Raw Water Permitted Surplus (MGD) -0.01 -0.76 -1.67 GPD = Gallons per Day MGD = Million Gallons per Day 'Value based on FDEP PWS ID 51141 ailable facil ty capaci z Permitted allocations for raw water un SFWMD WUP No. 11 298-W. s Raw water demands were determined using utility -specific raw- o-finished water ratio of 1.27, provided in the 2022 LWCWSP. J (section intentionally left blank) 17 Packet Pg. 558 9.A.3.c Collier County 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update January 2024 Collier County Public Utilities 3.6.4 Port of the Islands Capital Improvement District (CID) Port of the Islands CID maintains a SFWMD water use permit with combined allocations to serve both public water supply and irrigation demands under water use permit No. 11-00372-W which expires in September 2029, for a maximum annual allocation of 200 MG. This permit includes a series of surface water pumps that withdraw from FKA Canal for standby fire protection demands, in addition to a public water supply wellfield consisting of three (3) Surficial Aquifer System (SAS) wells. The SFWMD allocations included in the analysis consider the current permitted allocations associated with the public water supply only (98.66 MG) and exclude ations dedicated to irrigation demands. Based on the results of this analysj&Wufficient water supply currently exists, but renewal of the water use Emit on be necessary to meet estimated demands through the 10-year plannNasis od. Summary tables for the WTP wellfields and raw watery, for the utility service area are provided in Table — Port e Is nds CID Raw Water Supply Wellfield and Storage and Table .2 — of the Islands CID Facility Capacity Analysis for ProjecteJFinished emands. The existing and proposed Port of the is depicted in Figure 2C - Existing Port of the Islands CID Production W Table 7.1 - Port of th(W%rds CID Raw Water Supply Wellfield and Storage Detail Aquifer Source Lower Tamiami SFWMD Allocation (MGD) 0.27 Water Quality Fresh Total Permitted Wells 3 Potable Water Storage Tank Capacity (MG) 0.14 Note: Wellfield permitted under SFWMD WUP No. 11-00372-W. (section intentionally left blank) 18 Packet Pg. 559 9.A.3.c Collier County 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update January 2024 Collier County Public Utilities Table 7.2 - Port of the Islands CID Facility Capacity Analysis for Projected Finished Water Demands Permanent Resident Population Projections 2023 2028 2033 1,130 1,300 1,550 Finished Water Demand per Capita (GPD) 85.00 85.00 85.00 Finished Water Avg. Daily Demand (MGD) 0.10 0.11 0.13 Available Facility Capacity (MGD)' 0.44 0.44 0.44 Facility Capacity Surplus (MGD) 0.34 0.32 0.30 Raw Water SFWMD Allocation (MGD)' 0.27 0.27 0.27 Raw Water Avg. Daily Demand (MGD)3 0.13 0.15 0.18 Raw Water Permitted Surplus (MGD) 0.14 0.12 0.09 GPD = Gallons per Day MGD = Million Gallons per Day 'Value based on FDEP PWS ID 5110230 design capacity. a Permitted allocations for raw water under SFWMD WUP No. 11-00372-W. s Raw water demands were determined using utility -specific raw -to -finished wate o , provided in the 2022 LWCWSP. 3.7 Populations Served by D The 2022 SFWMD LWC SP Up efines DSS as potable water used by households served by sma u ess n 0.10 MGD) and by private wells and estimates DS�S,.�e all perm ent re idents outside the utility service areas included in the total population for Collier County. Furthermore, SFWMD assumes that the DSS demand is sourced from fresh surficial aquifer systems. Base data provided, 72,817 permanent residents are served by DSS in 2 and 88,512 eAanent residents are estimated for 2035 demonstrating an increase in anticlated DSS in Collier County and demands of 12.09 to 14.69 MGD from 2020 to 2035. For the 10-year planning period considered in this Work Plan, the DSS estimate provided in the 2022 SFWMD LWCWSP Update has been included in the overall analysis. Demands associated with DSS will be influenced by expansions in service areas to portions of Collier County not currently served by utility providers; inclusive of the providers included in this plan and those serving other local governments within Collier County and the LWC planning area. 19 Packet Pg. 560 Collier County 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update Collier County Public Utilities 9.A.3.c January 2024 3.7.1 Populations Served by FDEP Potable Water Systems (PWS) A review of the FDEP database for current potable water facilities (last updated 2022) was completed to determine populations served outside of CCWSD, IWSD, AMUC, and Port of the Islands CID service areas. Based on the PWS database, a total population of 9,991 is served by FDEP PWS with design capacities of less than 0.10 MGD. The FDEP regulated PWS are provided below in Table 8 — Populations Served by FDEP Potable Water Systems (PWS), 2022. Table 8 — Population Served by FDEP Potable Water Svstems (PWS). 2022 PWS ID Provider Name city Population Served 5110058 COLLIER COUNTY UTILITY COMPANY (LEE CYPRESS CO-OP) COPELAND 250 5110061 CORKSCREW SWAMP SANCTUARY NAPLES 50 5110087 BIG CYPRESS PARK HEADQUARTERS OCHOPEE 100 5110121 HAKAN SERVICE'S, INC. NAPLES 700 5110288 TRAIL LAKES CAMPGROUND OCHOPEE 240 5114074 CENTER POINT MMUNITY CHURCH NAPLES 600 5114077 TEMPLE BETHEL NAPLES 40 5114083 CA US LLC NAPLES 40 5114098 'jjrLE - GOLDEN GATE NAPLES 500 5114108 OASIS RANGER STATION OCHOPEE 25 5114111 qIIEANDALL CENTER NAPLES 50 5114113 SWFREC IMMOKALEE 99 5114119 %VALfRO GAS STATION IMMOKALEE 25 5114126 UNI FAITH MISSIONARY BAPTIST NAPLES 25 5114129 I-75 SOUTH REST STOP NAPLES 999 5114130 GOLDEN GATE LIBRARY NAPLES 175 5114131 BONITA BAY EAST GOLF CLUB - MAINTENANCE NAPLES 210 5114132 BONITA BAY EAST GOLF CLUB - CLUBHOUSE NAPLES 210 5114135 MONUMENT LAKE CAMPGROUND OCHOPEE 40 5114136 BONITA BAY EAST GOLF CLUB REST SHELTER 1 NAPLES 200 5114137 BONITA BAY GOLF CLUB REST SHELTER 2 NAPLES 200 5114139 HIDEOUT GOLF CLUB SYSTEM NAPLES 100 5114139 HIDEOUT GOLF CLUB SYSTEM NAPLES 100 5114139 HIDEOUT GOLF CLUB SYSTEM NAPLES 100 5114140 TREES CAMP WTP NAPLES 50 5114141 GOLDEN GATE ASSEMBLY OF GOD NAPLES 200 5114163 CENTER POINT COMMUNITY CHURCH YOUTH SANC NAPLES 166 20 Q Packet Pg. 561 9.A.3.c Collier County 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update January 2024 Collier County Public Utilities Table 8 — Population Served by FDEP Potable Water Svstems (PWS). 2022 (continued) PWS ID Provider Name city Population Served 5114164 PEACE LUTHERAN CHURCH OF NAPLES NAPLES 100 5114165 PEPPER RANCH IMMOKALEE 25 5114166 1-75 REST AREA MM 63 NORTHSIDE NAPLES 25 5114169 EVERGLADES SQUARE NAPLES 61 5114170 BIG BEAR PLAZA FOOD MART NAPLES 25 5114147 SABAL PALM ELEMENTARY NAPLES 1530 5114149 LA HISPANA #2 NAPLES 38 5114151 LA FITNESS NAPLES 500 5114152 ESTATES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL NAPLES 673 5114153 MIDWAY CAMPGROUND OCHOPEE 307 5114158 PALMETTO J ELEMENTARY SCHO NAPLES 583 5114159 WILSON BLVD. RETAIL CENTA NAPLES 50 5114160 NAPLES THERAPEUTIC RID NTER NAPLES 30 5114161 NAPLES CH H NAPLES 500 5114162 GOLDEN GATE WALGREENS (STORE # 10742) NAPLES 50 3.8 Agricultural, Landscape/ cr al, and Commercial/industrial Water Demands A summary of the estimated demands for agricultural, landscape/recreational, and commercial/industrial demands based on the data provided in the 2022 SFWMD LWCWSP Update, is provided in Table 9 - Agricultural, Landscape/Recreational, and Commercial/Industrial ater Demand Projections. Table 9 - Agricultural, ndscape/Recreational, and Commercial/industrial Water Demand Proiections Use Category Demand Pr Jections MGD 2020 2025 2030 2035 Agricultural 133.13 131.33 130.57 128.66 Commercial/Industrial/Institutional 7.52 8.19 8.76 9.29 Landscape 44.34 52 58.29 64.06 Golf 40.46 40.46 40.46 40.46 Total 225.45 231.98 238.08 242.47 Demand associated with agricultural, landscape/recreational, and commercial/industrial is anticipated to remain consistent with projections provided in 21 Packet Pg. 562 9.A.3.c Collier County 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update January 2024 Collier County Public Utilities the 2022 LWCWSP. Potential decreases in use for these categories could result in the expansion of services areas into former agricultural areas, which may include development of residential/commercial areas. Generally, raw water demands for landscape/recreation and commercial/industrial uses are less per acre than agricultural demands which could result in a net decrease in raw water demands. 3.9 Power Generation Supply Demands No existing and/or proposed use of power generation was identified for the utility providers included in this Work Plan. 3.10 Water Supply Provided by C The City of Naples, the City of Marco ty provide water utility services within Collier County. Theis utilities are associated with local City government and are subject to C 163, F.A.C. Therefore, these local governments are responsible for completing an epe �k Plan which incorporates the 2022 SFWMD LWCWSP Up 3.11 Potential Futu'lWater Suppliers No futur ter supplier wvl in Collier County are anticipated during the planning period. The ypress Stewardship District has entered into agreements for potable water, sanitary se , and IQ water services with the CCWSD for all County -approved projects. While such agreements are anticipated should future developments be proposed, the Big Cypress Stewardship District retains the right and authority to establish its own infrastructure. 3.12 Conservation and Reuse Efforts 3.12.1 Conservation The utility providers covered in this Work Plan actively promote the conservation of water resources through ordinances and public outreach. The 22 Packet Pg. 563 9.A.3.c Collier County 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update January 2024 Collier County Public Utilities following ordinances and guidelines provide conservation efforts within the CCWSD, IWSD, AMUC, and Port of the Islands CID service areas: Coun • Adoption of the SFWMD's Mandatory Year -Round Landscape Irrigation Conservation Measures Rule, pursuant to Chapter 40E-24, F.A.C. • Adoption of the use of low flow plumbing fixtures pursuant to section 604.4 of the Florida Building Code, Plumbing, 7th Edition (2020). • Land Development Code (4.06.00) for Landscaping, Buffering, and Vegetation Retention promoting the e of native and drought -tolerant vegetation through Florida-friendl;scaping. • Collier County Ordinance 03 — Groundwater Protection Zone, updated by Ordinance 12 ,Ar • Collier County Code of Ordi ce, Chapter 54 — Environment, Article XII — Water Conse La ape Irrigation. • Collier County Code r i nce, Chapter 90 — Water Resource Management, Article II, ivision 4, Water Shortage Plan. • Colli r County Cod Ordinance, Chapter 134, Article II, Collier y Water�Sewer District IQ Water Ordinance. Collier County Code of Ordinance, Chapter 134, Article III, Utilities dards and Procedures. • Cre n and maintenance of ConserveWaterLoveCollier.com, which is an internet resource maintained by Collier County to provide educational information and tools for the public to conserve water. Collier County's stewardship of water resource conservation via ordinances has been successful and has resulted in a total of 1,213 code enforcement actions from 2018 to 2023, related to water conservation and irrigation code investigations. 23 Packet Pg. 564 9.A.3.c Collier County 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update January 2024 Collier County Public Utilities (li 1traa A In addition, the utility providers promote public outreach for the education of end -users to employ conservation efforts at the user -level. Water conservation outreach includes, but is not limited to the following initiatives: • Distribution of educational pamphlets, school visits, and/or information booths for employees and customers. Information signs, press releases, and messages about water conservation on the bills. • Landscape irrigation guidelines for allowed days and times as established in the local government's year-round landscape irrigation ordinance. • Encourage the use of irrigation timers ensure settings are correct and rain sensors work properly. or • Finding and fixing water 1 conserves water, saves money and protects your home from age. • Avoid washing or cleaning streets, sidewalks, driveways, or other impervious areas wr. _ • When utilizwaterrishwashers ce shower durations, minimize loads of laundry,, and ly rwhen full. • Instructions for opts igation hours and system design to prevent the f excesssirrigation water (i.e., use of drought -tolerant trees and plants, pr ent watering of impervious areas, etc.); • oper ntenance and operation of irrigation system components to pre unnecessary use and/or losses; and • Interior conservation recommendations for domestic water use (i.e., shower durations, laundry, etc.), replacement of leaking pipes/fittings and/or appliances. Public Water Supply Water Use Permits o Low Flow Fixtures: Ultra -low volume plumbing fixtures will be installed in all new homes and businesses. o Rate Structures: Customer billing will be based on the use of water conservation -based rate structures. The rate structure will incorporate at 24 Packet Pg. 565 9.A.3.c Collier County 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update January 2024 Collier County Public Utilities least one or more of the following: increasing block rates, seasonal rates, quantity -based surcharges, and/or time of day pricing. o Leak Detection: The utility will implement leak detection programs in the event water losses exceed 10 percent. Reports of water leaks will be directed to personnel during working hours. Site tours and routine maintenance personnel trips along water supply and distribution lines will also be conducted. On a monthly basis, metered usage will be compared to the master potable supply meter reading. o Public Education: The utility will implement public education programs, including, but not limiteA, distribution of literature to households describing water conservation practices. o Irrigation: The utility will vide irri on water via a separate distribution system stridedi�ed to tha purpose, or individual developments wilibe respo for providing irrigation water separate from the potable s stem. utility will convert treatment plant effluent to reclaiw ch will be used for irrigation to the greases Jenasibl All irrigation systems will adhere to the water cons dscribed in Section 2.6.1 of the SFWMD Basis 0f Revie r Water Use Permit Applications. J e he Water Conservation Plan will be reviewed by nt on an annual basis and will have changes incorporated in that time. Conservation Projects o CCWSD is in the process of installing water mains within Golden Gate City to convert existing domestic self -supply users to CCWSD's Golden Gate Wellfield water supply which utilizes a brackish blend. The conversion of these existing domestic self -supply users to the CCWSD water supply will ultimately reduce demands from the SAS and replace demand with an alternative water source. This conservation project is anticipated to save 170 MGY. 25 Packet Pg. 566 9.A.3.c Collier County 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update January 2024 Collier County Public Utilities o CCWSD is in the process of installing water quality monitoring panels on water lines to reduce unnecessary flushing of lines and ultimately improve system efficiency. 3.12.2 Reuse Efforts CCWSD maintains two Water Reclamation Facilities (WRF): the North County WRF (NCWRF) and the South County WRF (SCWRF). In addition, CCWSD plans for the construction of the Northeast Service Area WRF (NESAWRF) which is planned to provide IQ water. These facilities either dispose of treated effluent via underground injection (UIC) and/or the treatment of wastewater to IQ water to be distributed to end -users #imarily consisting of golf courses, residential communities, environm� mitigate n reas, and County -owned lands to offset the irrigation demands. Furthermore, slier County has adopted the Collier County Water -Sewer District IQ Water Ordinance (Ordinance No. 2013-48) which establish rules for thAw-e of IQ water over higher quality water sources. The distribution system maintains approximately 130 miles of distribution lin s ge tanks, 29 storage ponds, and 6 pumping stations for distribution. re interconnected allowing distribution to north and so th regions ithin CCWSD and is supplemented by withdrawals from th A an ter le aquifer (WTA) under SFWMD water use permit num er 11-0005 -W (which CCWSD is actively working to update), via the Pelican Bay alfMule Pen Wellfields (9.23 MGD). In addition to the NCWRF and SCWRF, CCWSD plans upgrades of the existing Golden Gate Wastewater Treatment Plant (GGWWTP) and construction of the NESAWRF to increase treatment capacity and reuse distribution for the proposed service area. IWSD is in the planning phase for expansion and improvements of the current WTF. A component of the improvements will include reclaimed water infrastructure to provide IQ water to end -users within the service area. The intent to develop reclaimed water infrastructure will assist in reducing demands for IQ water currently being served by groundwater withdrawals. Currently, a 26 Packet Pg. 567 9.A.3.c Collier County 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update January 2024 Collier County Public Utilities reclaimed water distribution system does not exist in the IWSD service area. However, the IWSD has received state appropriations for advanced wastewater treatment plant improvements, which are scheduled to be completed by the end of 2029. Additionally, the IWSD anticipates beginning installation of reclaimed water mains within the service area to serve new developments as they occur during the 10-year planning horizon. AMUC currently maintains a reclaimed water distribution system which provides commercial and residential end -users IQ water within the Ave Maria community. The reclaimed water system is c]&V�ned to store treated IQ water in irrigation lakes throughout the co hich are withdrawn from to supply IQ water to the end -users. C has osed an expansion of the existing WWTF which will provide ar�ditional .25 MGD of treatment capacity and increased capacity to provide IQ water. The reclaimed water system has been a key element of inNcture since the construction of the community and is planned, to expand alongside the community. The use of reclaimed wate�sist*n deqLasing demand from the LTA and proposed use of the SSA. for maintains a WTF which provides reuse water quality water, used for standby fire protection which d from FKA Canal and LTA wellfield. The WTF permit authorizes the use of groundwater to supplement treated effluent which is then stored in one (1) storage tank and/or surface water pond prior to distribution for irrigation and/or fire system. (section intentionally left blank) 27 Packet Pg. 568 9.A.3.c Collier County 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update January 2024 Collier County Public Utilities A summary table is provided below in Table 10 — Water Treatment Facilities and Reclaimed Water Distribution for WTFs for utility providers included in this Work Plan. Existing and proposed wastewater service areas are provided in Figure 3 and existing reclaimed water lines and WTFs are shown in Figure 4. Table 10 - Water Treatment Facilities and Reclaimed Water Distribution Permitted Facility Water Treatment Facility Treatment Capacity Disposal Reuse Reuse Percentage MGD North County Regional Underground Injection WTP 24.10 Control /Reuse Y ° 80 to 90/° FL0141399 South County Regional Underground Injection WTP 16.00 Control /Reuse Y 80 to 90% FL0141356 Orange Tree WWTP' 0.75 percolation Pond N -- (FLA014165) Golden Gate L50 Underground Injection N (FLA142140) Control IWSD rl Injection (FLA014132) 4.00 Xwntrol N Potential Future Use AMUC 0 Reuse Y 100% (FLA376400) Port of the Islands CID 2 Reuse Y 100% (FLA141704) , 'Now proposed to be (section intentionally left blank) 28 Packet Pg. 569 9.A.3.c Collier County 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update January 2024 Collier County Public Utilities 4.0 REGIONAL WATER SUPPLY ISSUES Regional water supply issues identified in this Work Plan that may impact county and municipal water supply planning include the following in conjunction with the 2022 LWCWSP, which the County is actively working to address: • Existing use of fresh water sources (Surficial and Intermediate Aquifer Systems) is widespread throughout the LWC planning area due to favorable construction costs, shallow depths, aquifer yields, and fresh water quality. These aquifers can be sensitive due to the potential for impacts to wetlands and existing legal water uses, saltwater intrusion, and the potential to reach aquifer -specific maximum developable limits (MDLs). The SFWMD oversees the permitting for t e and all water resources within the LWC Planning Area and will only consid e increased allocations on an application -by -application basis to determine if?a project ets water use permitting criteria; therefore, the demand for fresh water4sources will encounter competing factors between users. • Withdrawals from the Floridan a Lxpected to increase to meet future demands. • Climate change andea level rise could impact the availability of freshwater resources in the LWC Planning Area. coordination between utility service (section intentionally left blank) 29 Packet Pg. 570 9.A.3.c Collier County 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update January 2024 Collier County Public Utilities 5.0 ALTERNATIVE WATER SUPPLY The utility providers included in this Work Plan primarily use the Surficial and Floridan Aquifer Systems due to the fresh groundwater quality and generally sufficient yield to provide the current demands but given the possible increased demand for population growth considered in this Work Plan, alternative water supplies must be evaluated for future planning considerations. Suitable alternative water supplies must be considered based on yield, recharge, current demand, and water/groundwater quality suitable for future development and sustainability as an alternative source. Traditionally, the Surficial aquifer has been utilized for current and historical demands due to the fresh groundwater quality, sufficient yield, and the financial advantage of a shallow aquifer requiring less treaAnt than surface water and/or deeper saline groundwater. For consideration by utility providers and consistent with the 2022 SFWMD LWCWSP Update, potential alternative water supplies i lude the following: Expanded Use of the Surficial Aquifer System (SAS) A significant demand in the Collier Cou portion of the LWC Planning Area is agricultural and unincorporated areas which utilize th SAS domestic and potable water supply, crop production and irrigation. Some utility providers have supplemented demands using brackish water supply, but the majo of the I rdwater withdrawals remain shallow fresh water sources. Expansion of deve t intoounrrent agricultural lands would relieve current allocations held by�the e�g agriC* tural users to be available for other uses such as potable water use. Although this would require rezoning and planning strategies, the groundwater use required for potable r terns is generally less per acre than existing agricultural use; therefore, the SAS rem s a viable groundwater resource for future expansions into agricultural and unincorporated areas of Collier County. Expansion of Reclaimed Water Distribution System (RWDS): Expansion of RWDS can supplement current irrigation demands within utility service areas and reduce the net withdrawals from the SAS associated with irrigation demands. Currently, utility providers have proposed expansions and/or construction of reclaimed water infrastructure, but the use of reclaimed water should remain a priority beyond the 10-year planning horizon to supplement demands for irrigation and/or industrial water demands. The 30 Packet Pg. 571 9.A.3.c Collier County 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update January 2024 Collier County Public Utilities expansion of RWDS requires significant infrastructure planning and development but can assist with providing an alternative IQ and industrial source to offset current and future demands from the aquifer systems. Aquifer Storage and Recover. stem ASRJ The benefits to an ASR include long-term storage of treated effluent and/or irrigation -quality water that can be used as a source for IQ water in times of drought and/or high demand. Additionally, ASR can improve (i.e., decrease salinity) lower quality groundwater depending on the chosen aquifer. The implementation of an ASR can require significant hydrogeological investigations and planning to assess whether suitable aquifer characteristics are present (i.e., confinement, groundwater quality, etc.); therefore, this alternative water supply source is subject to subsurface conditions. , Upper Floridan Aquifer System UFAS): The UFAS is known to contain hi r salinity undwater and require additional blending/treatment to provide irrigation a d/or potable 'quality water than shallower aquifers comprising the SAS. Althou e ne water presents treatment challenges, it can provide significant yield and curren se of t� minimal in comparison to the SAS; therefore, less competing factor to conside or allocations. (section intentionally left blank) 31 Packet Pg. 572 9.A.3.c Collier County 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update January 2024 Collier County Public Utilities 6.0 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS The proposed Capital Improvements include both publicly and privately funded water supply projects necessary to achieve and maintain the level of service standards throughout the 10- year planning horizon considered in this Work Plan and consistent with the capital improvements presented in the 2022 LWCWSP, the 2023 Collier County AUIR, and the Port of the Islands CID Capital Improvement Plan, updated August 2022. The Capital Improvement schedules for the utility providers are provided in Appendix H. A summary of the 2022 LWCWSP capital improvement projects and capital improvement projects update for utility providers included in this Work Plan are provided below in Ta 11— 2022 LWCWSP Capital Improvement Projects and Table 12 — Capital Improve me rojects Update. Table 11 - 2022 LWCWSP Capital Imbrovem t Proiects Utility Projected Completion Project Name/Description Project Capacity (MGD) Capital Costs ($M) Potable - SASV CCWSD 2032 Northeast Interim WTP (three p ases) and NE Lower Tamiami Aquifer Wellfield 2.88 $28.80 CCWSD 2037 New Northeast 3.0 MGD WTP Using Ion Exchan e Phase I 3 $24.20 Potable - IAS AMUC 2023 Sandstone Aquifer Wellfield Expansion (2 wells 0 $3.70 Potable - FAS AMUC 2031 2. MGD RO WTP Expansion 2.76 $5.00 IWSD 2032 ew 2.5 MGD RO WTP 2.5 $12.00 CCWSD 2037 New 2.0 MGD Northeast WTP — Phase I 2 $24.20 Nonpotable - Reclaimed Water AMUC 2030 Phase 2 — 1.25 MGD WWTF Expansion 1.25 $6.50 CCWSD 2030 Northeast New 1.50 MGD WWTF 0.75 $65.00 CCWSD 2023 Foxfire Reclaimed Water Supplemental Wells 1 $1.00 CCWSD 2030 South County WWTF Supplemental Wells 1 $3.00 CCWSD 2030 Golden Gate 2.5 MGD WWTF Expansion 2.5 $86.00 IWSD 2027 3.0 MGD Reclaimed Water Production Facility and Water Main Extension 3 $3.40 32 Packet Pg. 573 9.A.3.c Collier County 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update January 2024 Collier County Public Utilities Table 12 - Capital Improvement Projects Update Utility Projected Completion Project Name/Description Project Capacity (MGD) Capital Costs ($M) Potable - Surface Water Port of the Islands CID To Be Determined Water Line replacement Phase 1 1 $1.00 Port of the Islands CID To Be Determined Water Line replacement Phase 2 0.4 $1.00 Port of the Islands CID To Be Determined Dual -Purpose Potable Water/Fire Storage Tank 0.12 $1.00 Potable - SAS CCWSD 2030 Northeast Regional Water Treatment Plant Phase I - Nano 6 $105.60 CCWSD 2026 Northeast LT Wellfield 5 $22.50 CCWSD 2041 Tamiami Wellfield New Wells 0 $14.90 CCWSD Substantially Complete SCRWTP Reactor #4 Aor 0 $4.83 Potable - IAS AMUC 2029 Expansion of RO Treatment Plant 2.13 $8.50 AMUC In Progress, 2024 Sandstone A ifer Wellfield Expansion (2 wells 0.83 $6.90 Potable - FAS CCWSD 2030 Northeast Regional Water Treatment Plant Phase I - LPRO 4 $70.40 IWSD 2032 2.5 MGD RO WTP 2.5 $12.00 ` Nonpotable - Reclaimed Water CCWSD 2027 SCWRF/FOXFIRE IQ supplement 2 $3.00 CCWSD 2030 Northeast Regional Water Reclamation Facility 4 $144.00 CCWSD 2024 NE Utility Facilities - Interim 1.5 MGD WRF 1.5 $87.00 CCWSD 2027 Golden Gate City 3.5 MGD WWTP Expansion 3.5 $165.00 AMUC 2024 Phase 2 - 0.9 MGD WWTF Expansion 0.9 $20.00 AMUC 2030 Phase 3 - 1.2 MGD WWTF Expansion 1.2 $29.50 IWSD 2029 4.0 MGD Reclaimed/Reuse Water Treatment 4 $5.00 (section intentionally left blank) 33 Packet Pg. 574 9.A.3.c Collier County 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update January 2024 Collier County Public Utilities 7.0 GOALS, OBJECTIVES, POLICIES An assessment of existing Goals, Objectives, and Policies (GOPs) in the Collier County comprehensive plan was performed in preparation of this Work Plan to determine those that address water supply sources and facilities, as well as conservation and reuse programs. The following comprehensive plan GOPs are consistent except for two recommended changes to bring the Capital Improvement Element Policy 1.5: The standards for levels of service of public facilities, and Public Facilities Element, Potable Water Sub -Element Policy 1.7 into consistency among the 2022 LWCWSP and this Work Plan, where indicated below in strikethrough/underline format: o Intergovernmental Coordination: o (II)(IV) GOAL: COLLIER CO WI AINTAIN OR ENHANCE THE LEVEL OF COORD ON�AND PERATION AMONG THE VARIOUS GOVERN AUTHORITIES AND AGENCIES MAKING DECISIONS AFF ING NATURAL RESOURCES, a HOUSING, HISTOR% R HAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES, 00 as PUBLIC F CILITIES, A D PUBLIC SERVICES WITHIN AND AROUN OLLI R COTTY, TO RESOLVE DIFFERENCES AND TO ACHI OMP BLE AND COORDINATED PLANS. a o (II) V) JE E 1: Collier County (County) shall continue to establish co and mainta' intergovernmental communication and level of service L coo at mechanisms to be used by the County, Everglades City, the o City o arco Island, the City of Naples, and the City of Bonita Springs, adjacent Lee County, Hendry County, Broward County, Dade County, 0 L Monroe County, the District School Board of Collier County School Board, 0 the State of Florida, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, c Florida Department of Transportation, and South Florida Water E Management District, and any other entity that provides a service but may M not have land use authority. Q o (II)(III) Policy 1.4: In situations where other public or private entities are providing a facility or service within Collier County for roads, water, sewer, 34 Packet Pg. 575 Collier County 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update Collier County Public Utilities 9.A.3.c January 2024 drainage, parks, public schools, or solid waste, the County will coordinate its adopted level of service standard(s) within the parameters allowed by the Concurrency Management System of the Capital Improvement Element as part of the County's Growth Management Plan. o (II)(IV) Policy 2.8: The County shall coordinate with the South Florida Water Management District and other regulatory agencies in implementing the Growth Management Plan. o Public Facilities Element, Potable Water Sub -Element: o (VII)(VI)(IX)(X) Policy 1.7: The County has developed the Ten -Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan, dated February 2 January 2024, in accordance with the water supply guidelines of the most current version of the South Florida Water Mana ent Distr Lower West Coast Water Supply Plan. The County's /eaater Supp Facilities Work Plan is incorporated herein by referenc Ee o (VIII) GOAL: TO EQUATE PUBLIC FACILITIES CONCU IT EW DEVELOPMENT IN ORDER TO ACHIE N OR EXCEED ADOPTED STANDARDS FO E F SERVICE. o II)(IX) J IVE 1: (PUBLIC FACILITY LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDA ) Identify and define types of public facilities, establish standards r levels of service for each such public facility, and determine what quantity of additional public facilities is needed in order to achieve and maintain the standards. o (VIII) Policy 1.5: The standards for levels of service of public facilities shall be as follows: (I)(III)(IV)(VIII)(X)(XV)(XX) D. County Potable Water Systems: County Water District = 4-50130 gallons per capita per day (gpcd) (I)(III)(IV)(VIII)(X)(XV)(XX) E. County Sanitary Sewer — Wastewater Treatment Systems: 35 a) a IL LL 0 c 0 U as 0 c a) E Q Packet Pg. 576 9.A.3.c Collier County 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update January 2024 Collier County Public Utilities North Wastewater Treatment Serwiee Area — 100 gallons per- eapita per day (gped) South Wastewater Treatment Serwiee Area — 100 gallons per eapita per day (gped) Wastewater Treatment Service Area — 90 2pcd o (VIII)(X) OBJECTIVE 4: (PROVIDE NEEDED IMPROVEMENTS) Coordinate County land use planning and decisions with its plans for public facility capital improvements, as described in Policy 1.1 above, by providing needed capital improvements for replacement of obsolete or worn out facilities, eliminating existing deficiencies, and future development and redevelopment caused by previously issued and new development orders. o (III)(V)(VII)(VIII)(IX)(XV) P40 4.6: P facilities and services provided by Collier County with , lic funds in accordance with the Schedule of Capital Improvements in this Capital Improvement Element will be limited to Serll�tablished within the boundaries designated on Figure PW-1 "CollieA County Water District Boundaries", and Figure -Xijstinnd Future Potable Water Service Areas", in the Potable er Sf the Public Facilities Element, and on Figure WT-1, "Collier County Sewer District Boundaries", and Figure WT-2, "Existing a dire Wastewater Treatment Service Areas", in the Wastewater eatment Sub -Element of the Public Facilities Element. Road and Public School improvements will be provided as designated in their respective Schedule of Capital Improvements appearing in this Capital Improvement Element. All other public facilities and service types will be provided on a countywide availability basis. o (VIII)(X)(XV)(XX) Policy 5.3: The Concurrency requirement for the Potable Water, Wastewater Treatment, Stormwater Management and Solid Waste Disposal Level of Service Standards of this Growth Management Plan will be achieved or maintained if any one of the following standards of the Concurrency Management System is met: 36 Packet Pg. 577 Collier County 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update Collier County Public Utilities 9.A.3.c January 2024 ■ (III) A. The necessary facilities and services are in place at the time a final site development plan, final plat or building permit is issued; or ■ (III) B. The necessary facilities and services are under construction at the time a final site development plan, final plat or building permit is issued; or ■ (IX)(XV) C. The necessary facilities and services are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement that includes the provisions of paragraphs A and B of this Policy. An enforceable development agreement may include, but i of limited to, development agreements pursuant to Sec ' 3.3220 — 163.3243, Florida Statutes, or an agree<ttutes evelop t order issued pursuant to Chapter 380, Florida he agree ent mustguarantee that the necessary facilite in place when the impacts of the development occur, po Section 163.3180, Florida Statutes. • Future Land Use Element: _qW o GOAL: T L D USE DECISION -MAKING SO AS TO ACHIE N A HIGH QUALITY NATURAL AND H RONMENT WITH A WELL PLANNED MIX OF MPA E ND USES WHICH PROMOTE THE PUBLIC'S LTH, FETY AND WELFARE CONSISTENT WITH STATE PLA REQUIREMENTS AND LOCAL DESIRES. o (XXX)(XLIV) OBJECTIVE 2: Coordinate land uses with the availability of public facilities, accomplished through the Concurrency Management System of the Capital Improvement Element and implemented through the Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance of the Land Development Code. o (XXX)(XLIV) Policy 2.2: The County shall prepare annually the Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) on Public Facilities which shall include a determination of the existing conditions of capital public facilities, determine the remaining available capacity, forecast future needs in the five year capital improvement schedule and identify needed improvements and 37 Q Packet Pg. 578 9.A.3.c Collier County 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update January 2024 Collier County Public Utilities funding to maintain the level of service adopted in Policy 1.5 of the Capital Improvement Element • Conservation and Coastal Management Element o (VI)(XI) OBJECTIVE 4.2: Continue to promote conservation of Collier County's potable water supply and continue to develop, implement and refine a comprehensive conservation strategy through the Collier County Water -Sewer District and the Collier County Water and Wastewater Authority, which identifies specific goals for reducing per capita potable water consumption. o Policy 4.2.1: Continue to rely on the South Florida Water Management District to take appropriate m es to coq ve water in emergency situations. ` o (VI) Policy 4.2.2: The County ,shall negotiate agreements with area golf courses to accept and ted �ewater effluent for irrigation when and where such treatete e available from existing and future o Policy 4�; IdgjjRjj@NjjgTg and future publicly owned lands suitable for on �wifl&keated wastewater effluent, such as government building highway medians, and incorporate these into future disposal. o Police: Identify existing and future privately owned lands suitable for irrigation with treated wastewater effluent, such as cemeteries, agricultural operations, nurseries and commercial/industrial parks, and incorporate these into future planning for effluent disposal. o Policy 4.2.5: Evaluate and make recommendations, where appropriate, for plumbing fixtures and landscapes that are designed for water conservation purposes. 38 Packet Pg. 579 9.A.3.c Collier County 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update January 2024 Collier County Public Utilities 8.0 REFERENCES Bureau of Economic and Business Research (BEBR), 2023, Projections of Florida Population by County, 2025-2050, with Estimates for 2022. Volume 56, Bulletin 195. April 2023. CDM Smith, 2019, Collier County 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update, February 2019. Collier County Planning and Zoning Department, Comprehensive Planning Section, Collier County Growth Management Plan, Intergovernmental Coordination Element, adopted October 1997, amended May 23, 2023. Collier County Planning and Zoning Department, Comprehe e Planning Section, Collier County Growth Management Plan, Future Land Use Ele adopted October 1997, amended January 8, 2023. Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section ning Division wth Management Community Development Department, Collier ty 2 Annual Update & Inventory Report/Capitol Improvement Element Schedule on Public Facilities. 2022. Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section, Zonil*Division Growth Management Community Development Department, Collier Countyp,023 Annual Update & Inventory Report/Capitol Improvement El chedule Update on Public Facilities. 2023. Immokalee Water and Sewer District, Report & Development, 2022. IWSD Water and Sewer District, Public Facilities Report, Immokalee Water and Sewer District, 2022. Florida Department Jnviroental Protection, Potable Water Systems Facility Reports, 2022. Port of the Islands Community Improvement District, Capital Improvement Plan, August 2021, Updated August 2022. South Florida Water Management District, 2015, Applicant's Handbook for Water Use Permit Applications within the South Florida Water Management District, 2015. South Florida Water Management District, Ave Maria University and Town PWS, Ave Maria Town and County Utilities, Water Use Permit No. 11-02298-W, Application No. 201019-9. March 31, 2021. South Florida Water Management District, Collier County Public Water Supply, Collier County Board of County Commissioners, Water Use Permit No. 11-00249-W, Application No. 200221-10. July 27, 2020. 39 Packet Pg. 580 9.A.3.c Collier County 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update Collier County Public Utilities January 2024 South Florida Water Management District, CCWSD IQ Supplemental Wellfields, Collier County Board of County Commissioners, Water Use Permit No. 11-00052-W, Application No. 220715-3. August 3, 2022. South Florida Water Management District, Immokalee Water and Sewer District, Water Use Permit No. 11-00013-W, Application No. 100514-6. May 23, 2011. South Florida Water Management District, Lower West Coast Water Supply Plan with Appendices, December 21, 2017. South Florida Water Management District, 2022, Lower West Coast Water Supply Plan with Appendices, December 8, 2022. South Florida W County Commis February 17, 20, South Florida W Community Imp 081125-11. Aug -r County Board of No. 210817-4. Islands .pplication No. 40 Packet Pg. 581 9.A.3.c Figure 1— Current and Future Water Service Areas P J+ Packet Pg. 582 9.A.3.c Co -ier CoH.xty Public U6litiesDepaWnerd Engineenng & Project Management Division 10-Year Collier County Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update Collier County, Florida �, oHNsoN ENcwEeRiNc, .No. • `� 2,2� oHNsoN sA '33 FORT NE: (2 FLO 34— 046 PHONE: (239) 334-0046 ENGINEERING E8. 0642 & LB 0642 Current and Future Water Service Areas DATE oe< 2023 PROJECT No. 0203066-03 FlLE No. — SCALE Nis SHEET F�g�re i Packet Pg. 583 9.A.3.c Figure 2A — Existing and Proposed CCWSD Production Wellfields u Packet Pg. 584 9.A.3.c � 1 IIIIIIIIC�■■■� , �� Win• .� r, !M -� ,�� I� •=1#Ir1, SERVICE AREA WELLFIELD ORANGE TREE WELLFIELD EAWELLFIELD I: 1--pply-1— 1. South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) Public Water ' � ant LLi Co County 10-Year Collier County Water Supply �:Ivz JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC. Existing and Proposed CCWSD ter T r Facilities Work Plait Update 2122 JOHNSON STREET FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33901 Production WellfieldS Public UhfIGes Department Engineering & Project Management Division Collier County, Florida PHONE (239) 334-0046 E N G I N E E R I N G E.B. #642 & L.B. #642 DATE Dec 2023 PROJECT NO. 2020306fi-037 FILE N0. - SCALE As Shown SHEET Figure 2A Packet Pg. 585 9.A.3.c 2B — Existing and Proposed IWSD and AMUC Production Wellfields Packet Pg. 586 9.A.3.c PROPOSED UPPER FLORIDAN WELLFIELD 3 2 4 Miles Legend Proposed Public Water Supply WeIIFlBId Existing Public Water Supply WeIlFleld CARSON ROAD WELLFIELD J.V. WARDEN WELLFIELD AMUC OIL WELL RD AIRPORT ROAD Notes 1. South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) Public Water Supply WeIlFleld locations were acQuired from the SFWMD GIS Websile and were last updated 9/22/2023. Cbfvew Co10-Year u my Public UhlIhes Departrnent Engineering & Project Management Division Collier County Water Supply Work ork Plait Update Collier County, Florida • JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC. `r 2122 JOHNSON STREET FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33901 PHONE (239) 334-0046 E N G I N E E R I N G E.B. #642 & L.B. #642 Existing and Proposed IWSD and, AMUC Production Wellfields DATE Dec 2023 PROJECT NO. 2020306fi-03) FILE N0. - SCALE As Shown SHEET Figure 26 Packet Pg. 587 9.A.3.c Figure 2C — Existing Port of the Islands CID Production Wellfield Packet Pg. 588 9.A.3.c PORT OF THE ISLANDS CID WELLFIELD 0 Legend I V Existing Public Water 2 4 Supply Wellfield Miles Notes 1. South Flonda Water Management District (SFWMD) Public Water Supply Wellfeld location was acquired from the SFWMD GIS Website and were last updated 9/22/2023. l0-Year Collier County Water .Supply • JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC. Existing Port Of the Islands CID CO per County T r `r 2122 JOHNSON STREET Production Wellfleld Facilities Work Plan V pdate FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33a01 Public Uhllhes Department PHONE (239) 334-0046 DATE PROJECT NO. FILE N0. SCALE SHEET Engineering & Project Management Division Collier County, Florida E N G I N E E R I N G E.B. #642 & L.B. #642 Dec 2023 2020306fi-03) - As Shown Figure 2C Packet Pg. 589 9.A.3.c Figure 3 — Current and Future Wastewater Service Areas Packet Pg. 590 9.A.3.c Collier County Water -Sewer District - -- Cunren! and Future Wastewater Service Areas R 23 5 P 'lli 41 R VY 2 R 11. 5 R Q. 1 9 5 8 10 A+Sliss. .E�'-' 'sr� rxso sa�+®a.. roa•uatwao.o + 1-4"4nd -irr,r.e6,,lz,\'latter &Sc.'.Er QIcF.rIG ---- - i #Farnf eall:er Wxaaw>ttlar Snr -.•" Arm - - �' ® 9oum lnllly ii'iiWlsilRl Gntiica pros - • sv ,• r . Y Qni9or isle iVeelCwaPo S i'cc M•es Nnrfi ea a Vdae+.ewwlm 4.rinae A— K ,e � - f7lgnpn TlaeS'iunl..mMr+Eaa:bm Rl Ce ~ •. 4:.evwd 6V CH Pw.. •. .......... wm�wceao �-�..- � Ek+#Ida6 Fi{I nl C'[:\"�'ST5 kIY $poll r"'C'I ..__ ... .. j - - Q r71Ft!4i FctiM4oY . �. aI �. MENWIR SL .1 IL El. +� A _9' �711 � •-� �'-l- IQ-J. eounaary � S onwa�.o � q. `s"'�°,�o•�s S I I I} l' f al I ' ■ b ice Are �a a x+nn wsosemunrea awnaery. jai ,1. ' A J._rrf al' •I _ ss qI l fl y.aAI71 41 �_ .� �/�^� SERVICE ggHE�bLANDb CiO ' J 1 \ [ Note �re �—� _ , Collier County WateFigr-Sewer District provided document for current service -_ area, September 22, 2023. Ut llry Sery ce Are - -- ' • "'• •^'^• '• - Co per CoHxty 10-Year Collier County Water Supply , ��M � D2122 HMSO ERI"°• T 2i22 JOHNSON STREET FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33901 Current and Future Wastewater Service Facilities Work Plan Update PHONE: (239) 334-0046 Areas DATE Dec PRD—T No. 0203066-03 FILE ND. SCALE NTS ET Figure 3 Public U6lrbesDepartment Collier County, Florida ENGINEERING E.B. #642 & L.B. #642 Engineering & Project Management DiviSion 2023 - Packet Pg. 591 9.A.3.c Figure 4 — Existing Reclaimed Water Lines and Wastewater Treatment Facilities �W, Packet Pg. 592 9.A.3.c BONITA BEACH ROAD I -- - -- --- _ — -- — — — B _ ---- _—_ __ ——_—_—_—_—_-1 Collier County -North Regional OIL 41 IMMOKALEE RD 846 — - _LL— 951 GOLDEN GATE BLVD opine Ridge Rd z c =>Y_j - — Immokalee o3 F > z g — m— a o Golden Gate PkwyJ 0 D(AVIS BLVD-{ti-�-L � - Immokalee Rd 41 e 'f E Collier County -South Regional �"� Ave Maria 5 0 1 2 w J 0 ` 1vTe — - _ OIL WELL RD 0 1 2 �Qp Port of The Islandsi`LegendWastewater [Legend Treatment Facilities GCnf�-' Lines 92 _WastewaterTreatmentFacilities ---Reclaimed Lines odatea 0 012023,ere 0 e rAm m. srwrn0 msReclaimed 7 CO eY County 10-Year Collier County Water Supply • !� `r El WE 1 JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC. 2122 JOHNSON STREET Existing Reclaimed Lines and Wastewater Treatment Facilites TT U Facilities Work Plan pdate FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33901 Public tihlIGes DeparMlent Engineering & Project Management Division Collier County, Florida ENGINEERING PHONE (239) 334-0046 E.B. #642 & L.B. #642 DATE Dec 2a23 PROJECT NO. 20203066-03] FILE NO. SCALE AS Shown SHEET Flgure4 Packet Pg. 593 9.A.3.c Appendix A — Interlocal Agreement between CCWSD and the City of Naples r� J Packet Pg. 594 9.A.3.c IT (;(Mp Ny CITY OF NAPLES WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVI INTERLOCAL SERVICE BOUNDARY AGREEMENT AND ACCORD AND SATISFACTION THIS INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT, (herein "this Agreement") is entered into this P O 3 day of ►'1k0_11 , 2009, between the City of Naples, Florida ("City") and the o 0 Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida ("County"), as the Governing Body o of Collier County and as Ex-Officio the Governing Board of the Collier County Water -Sewer " r District ("CCWSD"). o ARTiC LF ONF. BACKGROUND INFORMATION �d bd 1. By enactment of City of Naples Ordinance No. 2698 (passed 2"d reading on June 15, N O Q _ r� ,. ,_ ao 1977), the City exercised its Chapter 180, Florida Statutes, power and authority to extend the e City's water and wastewater utility facilities into specific geographic areas in unincorporated d o Collier County as such areas are depicted by a one (1) page map and a twenty-one (2 1) page legal description that was attached to and made a part of that Ordinance. 0 r„ w 2. The County and the City entered into a Basic Agreement (the `BA") effective October 16,' o i] H 1977. The original BA addressed only potable water service from the City to specified - geographic areas in unincorporated County (as such areas are described by the legal description w in Exhibit "A" that was attached to the BA). The following items were attachments to the r original BA: 2� oW b� a. Exhibit "A" - (2 pages). Page 1 of Exhibit "A" is a "metes and bounds legal description of the City's Water Service Area Boundary. Page 2 of that Exhibit "A" is a map (graphic) depicting the then existing geographic boundaries of the .- City's Water Service Area. o o a b. Exhibit "B" is a 1-page map (graphic) entitled "City Franchised Water Service Area." C. Exhibit "C" is a 1-page map (graphic) denoted as "City Raw Water Transmission Main and Supply Wells." d. Exhibit "D" is a 5-page "preliminary report" (in letter form) signed by Ted Smallwood on behalf of `BC&E/CH2M Hill." That Report (at its page 5) states that it is "... a preliminary report intended only to provide general guidance to Page I of 16 Packet Pg. 595 9.A.3.c both the City and County in establishing policy for the future of the respective governing bodies' utilities." 3. Addendum #3 to the BA addressed (for the first time) wastewater service from the City to specified geographic areas in unincorporated Collier County. 4. The original BA has been amended by two (2) "Amendments" and by nine (9) "Addendums." The BA and the eleven (11) amending agreements are: City's Authorization Effective Date Item's Description Applicability City Res. No. 2783 October 16, 1977 The Basic Agreement Active City Res. No. 3284 June 20,1979 Addendum # 1 Added 2 water meter sites City Res. No. 3305 August 1, 1979 Addendum # 2 Added 1 water meter site City Res. No. 3502 April 2, 1980 AMENDMENT # 1 Fully Executed City Res. No. 84-4526 August 15, 1984 AMENDMENT # 2 Fully Executed City Res. No. 84-4598 November 7,1984 Addendum # 3 Active City Res. No. 86-5136 November 3,1986 Addendum # 4 Fully Executed City Res. No. 86-5160 December 3,1986 Addendum # 5 Fully Executed City Res. No. 87-5430 November 18,1987 Addendum # 6 Fully Executed City Res. No. 89-5733 February 1,1989 Addendum # 7 Fully Executed C4ty Res. No. 90-6117 May 16, 1990 Addendum # 8 Fully Executed City Res. No. 91-6347 April 3, 1991 Addendum # 9 Fully Executed Informational Notes: The original BA agreed that the City would supply water at the following four (4) water interconnect locations: U.S. 41 and Thomasson Drive; Radio Road one mile north of Pine Ridge Road; Pulling Road two miles north of Pine Ridge; and U.S. 41 and 91" Avenue North, Naples Park. Addendum # 1 agreed that the City would supply water at the following added two (2) interconnection points: Lakewood Unit #7 — Boca Cieca Drive and Marcor Drive; and Kings' Lake — Evergreen Lake Road in the vicinity of Lakewood Boulevard. Page 2 of 16 Packet Pg. 596 9.A.3.c Addendum #2 added one (1) additional water service connection point as follows: King's Lake North — Eastern end of Estey Drive. AMENDMENT #1 (a) amended BA paragraph 13 to agree that the City was to quitclaim specified utility facilities to the County regarding the City's water service to the BA's Exhibit B water service area; (b) added a new paragraph 13A into the BA (regarding planned relocation of City -owned water tank) and (c) amended BA paragraphs 7, 8, 11 and 21. AMENDMENT #2 (a) added a new subparagraph (h) to BA paragraph 2 (to add one additional connection point to the City's 5 million gallon water storage tank, located at Carica Road, subject to the County assuming permanent water service to the geographic areas described as south of township line between Townships 48 South and 49 South, outside of the City's water service area as depicted on the BA's Exhibit "A;" (b) Amended the BA's paragraph 3 to establish a rate payment formula applicable to only BULK water sold by the City to the County; (c) Amended paragraph 7 to the BA to agree that the water meter at U.S. 41 and Thomason Drive would remain in place and continue to be used; (d) Also amended the BA's paragraph 8 to agree that the City could limit the quantities of its supply of BULK rate City treated water; (e) Deleted BA paragraphs 9 and 10; (f) Amended BA paragraph 12 to agree that the City could limit the quantity of the City's supply of BULK water if the County did not commence construction of specified water facilities by January 1, 1989; and (g) Amended BA paragraph 13A to agree that the County would pay interest regarding specified construction costs. Addendum #3 acknowledged that the City was serving (and would continue to permanently serve) twenty-two (22) geographic areas listed therein with wastewater service and also agreed to many specifics regarding that wastewater service. Paragraph 7 in Addendum #3 refers to then existing contingencies regarding possible wastewater service from the City to the Pine Ridge Industrial Park. (Permanent wastewater service to the Pine Ridge Industrial Park is currently being provided by the CCWAD.) Addendum #4 transferred the Pelican Bay Improvement District to the CCWSD for permanent potable water service and transferred the following (as therein described) water service sites: Located on the west side of Airport Road and south of Pine Ridge Road) to the City for permanent wastewater service from the City: Bear's Paw, Poinciana Village, Poinciana School, Pine Woods, Naples Bath and Tennis, and The Falls. Addendum #5 transferred the Sutherland Center to the City for five (5) years of interim water service from the City. (The CCWSD now supplies permanent water service to the Sutherland Center.) Addendum #6 agreed that the City would provide interim water service to the Pine Ridge Middle School. (The CCWSD now supplies permanent water service to that school.) Addendum #7 agreed that the City would provide interim water service to the East Naples Community Park. (The CCWSD now supplies permanent water service to that Park.) Addendum #8 agreed that the City would supply bulk potable water service to the Wyndemere Subdivision. (The CCWSD now supplies permanent water service to that subdivision) a a. c� 21 Q. a 3 L a� 0 0 0 1* 0 0 0 0 v N CD J 1 d Co . 0, ti Page 3 of 16 Packet Pg. 597 . 9.A.3.c Addendum #9 agreed that the City would provide interim water service to the North Naples Fire Station. (The CCWSD now supplies permanent water service to that Fire Station.) 5. Only the original BA (regarding water service), and Amendment #2 (amending the BA's Paragraph 3 to create a rate payment formula applicable to BULK water sold by the City to the County), and Addendum #3 (regarding City wastewater service to twenty-two listed geographic areas) have provisions that have not been fully executed. All of the other ten (10) above -listed items have been fully executed. Several of those items applied for limited time periods that have come and gone. 6. Except as provided in paragraph 5, above, this Agreement cancels and supersedes the BA, the two (2) amendments to the BA and the nine (9) addendums to the BA. This Agreement does not affect any previously executed aspect of the BA, or any amendment or addendum to the BA, such as and without limitation: (a) transfer of title to any real property and/or any previously executed transfer of title to any personal property; (b) any prior grant of, transfer of, or any other right to use any property including easements; nor (c) any prior grant of any right to use personal property. This Agreement does not affect any now existing water interconnection service site, any right of any water or sewer service customer or service site, or any third party beneficiary. 7. Term of this Agreement. This Agreement shall continue for a period of thirty (30) years unless terminated in writing by the City and the County. 8. Amendments to this Agreement. This Agreement shall be amended only by written amending agreement(s) executed by the City and by the County and which shall include the following example (title): "This First Amending Agreement amends the 2009 City of Naples, Collier County interlocal Agreement — Accord and Satisfaction." The Second Amending Agreement shall be titled "This Second Amending Agreement .... 9. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding on the successors and/or assigns, if any, of the City, the County and/or the CCWSD. 10. Definitions. "Complex" refers to the present County Government Complex. "County" means "Collier County." "CCWSD` means "the Collier County Water -Sewer District." Page 4 of 16 Packet Pg. 598 9.A.3.c "Imputed sewer service gallonage" means the quantity of sewer service gallonage determined by a percentage of water supplied by the City to the respective service site or service geographic area. "Horseshoe Drive Areas refers to the South Horseshoe Drive Area/Collier Industrial Park, plus the Coconut River Estates Area (in residential use), and plus the River Reach Area (in residential use). "In -City rates" means City water service rates and/or sewer service rates that do not include any surcharge. "Out -of City rates" means City water service rates and/or sewer service rates that can include the City's discretionary 25% surcharge. "Meter measured gallonage" refers to the gallons of water and/or sewage gallonage measured by a water meter. In that sewer flow meters are inaccurate, sewer flow equivalency will be based upon the metered water bill. "School site" refers to the Shadowlawn Elementary School site. "Sewer" and "wastewater" are synonymous. "Surcharge" means the City's Subsection 180.191(1)(a), Florida Statutes, twenty-five percent (25%) surcharge. ARTICLE TWO CITY'S EXISTING WATER AND SEWER SERVICE TO UNINCORPORATED AREAS OF COLLIER COUNTY 1. CITY'S EXISTING WATER SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES IN UNINCORPORATED COLLIER COUNTY. The geographic boundaries of the City's existing water service areas in unincorporated Collier County are depicted in Exhibit "A" attached to this -mr�_ Agreement. Pursuant to this Agreement, the City shall continue to provide those water services to those geographic areas. 2. CITY'S EXISTING SEWER SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES IN UNINCORPORATED COLLIER COUNTY. The geographic boundaries of the City's existing sewer service areas in unincorporated Collier County are depicted in Exhibit "A" attached to this Agreement. The City shall continue to provide its sewer service to those geographic areas, excepting only the Complex and the School site. Throughout the term of this Agreement the City's sewer rates, fees and charges to be applied to the Complex shall be and remain the same as the City's then existing in -City sewer rates, fees and charges as set forth in the City of Naples Utilities Rate Schedule for Commercial Customers. For sewer rates fees and charge purposes, throughout this Agreement, the Complex shall be treated as if it is physically located within the Page 5 of 16 Packet Pg. 599 9.A.3.c City's geographic boundaries. Those geographic areas at the time of this Agreement are depicted in Exhibit "A" attached to this Agreement. ARTICLE THREE 1. WATER AND SEWER SERVICE TO THE COMPLEX SCHOOL SITE AND THE a a HORSESHOE DRIVE AREAS. 21 a A. City Water Service to School site. The City shall continue to supply water service to w the School site, shall invoice the school site and retain all such water service revenues. B. City Water Service to the Complex; Rates-, Minimum Water Pressure The City shall L continue to supply water service to the Complex. The City shall apply its generally applicable in- City water service rates to the Complex as set forth in the City of Naples Utilities Rate Schedule o c for Commercial Customers (no water surcharge). Provided an adequate and appropriate meter 0 , size is in use, the water pressure shall not be less than fifty (50) pounds per square inch as o� J Connect a. pressure tested at the water meters that int that water to the Complex. ; CO C. Sewer Service Supplied by the City to the Complex and School Site Transferred to the N CCWSD, City Sewer Rates to School Site. The City has been supplying sewer service to the 4) Complex and School site (through the Linwood Avenue force main). At no cost to the City, the County will disconnect the Complex and School site from the Linwood force main and � concurrently connect both of these two service sites to the CCWSD's sewer system. This U_ Agreement does not control the City's sewer rates to be applied by the City to the School site. L o Applying the City's then generally applicable sewer service rates, the City shall collect and retain Q all of those revenues. D. Sewer Gallonage Imputed to the School site. Each billing -cycle the sewer service L gallonage to be imputed to the School Site shall be fixed by applying 100% of the City's metered 6 water gallonage supplied to the School site. E E Quantity of Sewer Service Imputed to the Complex — City's in -City sewer service M r rates. The sewer service gallonage to be imputed to the Complex shall be fixed by 100% of City Q meter measured gallons of only the "net potable water" supplied to the Complex each City billing -cycle. The following City supplied water shall be excluded to calculate the sewer service gallonage imputed to the Complex: City water for irrigation; City water for use by the County's cooling tower; and City water for other future water uses, if any, if that water will not increase Page 6 of 16 Packet Pg. 600 9.A.3.c the sewage gallonage coming from the Complex (into the CCWSD's sewer system). The City shall apply its generally applicable in -City sewer service rates to the Complex as set forth in the City of Naples Utilities Rate Schedule for Commercial Customers (no sewer surcharge). For these sewer rate purposes the Complex shall be treated as if it is (and remains) wholly within the City's geographic boundaries. 2. THE HORSESHOE DRIVE AREAS; WATER AND SEWER SERVICE TO THESE AREAS; SEWAGE EQUALIZATION TRANSFERS FROM CCWSD TO CITY A. City Water Service to the Horseshoe Drive Areas. The following three geographic areas are referred to in this Agreement as the "Horseshoe Drive Areas": (1) South Horseshoe Drive/Collier Industrial Park (the "Park") which is in industrial or commercial uses; (2) the Coconut River Estates, and (3) the River Reach area, which are both in residential uses. The City will continue to supply water to these areas by applying the City's then generally applicable water service rates. The Horseshoe Drive Areas are depicted in Exhibit "B" attached to this Agreement. B. Transfer of the Horseshoe Drive Areas Sewer Service from the CCWSD to the City. As contemplated by paragraph 5 of an Interlocal Service Boundary Agreement between and among the City, County and the East Naples Fire Control and Rescue District dated November 2, 2007, in conjunction with the Collier Park of Commerce annexation (OR: 4298, PG 2715, Public Records of Collier County), the City shall provide sewer service as soon as possible, to the Horseshoe Drive Areas (through the Horseshoe Drive Interconnection - See Paragraph E, below). C. Sewer Service Gallonage to the Imputed to the Horseshoe Drive Areas. The amount of City supplied sewer gallonage to be imputed to the Park area shall be fixed by 100% of the metered water gallons supplied by the City to the customers in the Park area during each billing -cycle. The amount of sewer service gallonage to be imputed to the Coconut River Estates and to the River Reach areas shall be eighty percent (80%) of the City's metered water gallonage supplied to those areas each City billing -cycle. D. Sewer Service to the Horseshoe Drive Areas. The CCWSD has been providing sewer service to the Horseshoe Drive Areas, and by agreement with the CCWSD, applying the CCWSD's sewer service rates, the City has been collecting these revenues and has been Page 7 of 16 Packet Pg. 601 9.A.3.c remitting those revenues to the CCWSD. The City shall continue to collect those revenues from the customers in the Horseshoe Drive Areas and shall continue to remit those sewer service revenues to the CCWSD. By means of the sewage equalization transfers (See Paragraph E, below), and that the School administration shall pay the City for the sewer service gallonage imputed to the School site (as invoiced by the City to the School site), and that the County shall pay the City for the sewer service gallonage imputed to the Complex (as invoiced by the City to the County), the City will thereby be paid in full for the sewage equalization transfers delivered to the City through the Horseshoe Drive Interconnection (the net result being the same as if that sewage gallonage is delivered to the City's system from the Complex and from the School site). This interconnection point is located near the southwest corner of Airport Pulling Road and North Horseshoe Drive (The location is depicted on Exhibit "C" attached to this Agreement). E. Sewage Flow Equivalency Transfers. The intent of this Agreement is that, equivalent sewer flows will be diverted to the City, as measured by the City of Naples metered water bill. The amount of equivalent sewage to the City's sewer system from the area (as described in Article Three, item 2.A.) connected to the Interconnect ("I/C") will be diverted by the CCWSD opening the I/C located at the southwest corner of Horseshoe Drive and Airport Pulling Road. Throughout the first year of the agreement, the staffs of City of Naples and the CCWSD will jointly monitor the City of Naples Water bills to determine equivalent sewer flows as noted in other sections (Article Three, item 1. D., item 1. E., and item 2.C.) of this agreement. After the first year of execution of this agreement, equivalent sewer flows will be adjusted in the months following based on the joint agreement between the CCWSD and the City of Naples staff. If all possible flow from the area connected to I/C and diverted to the City at maximum hydraulic flow capacity of the VC, said flow will be deemed equivalent. The process described herein will be repeated each year following the first year during the life of this agreement. F. Reimbursement Payment from County to City regarding, the Horseshoe Drive Interconnect. The CCWSD has expended $138,159.25 to interconnect a CCWSD-owned wastewater force main to the City's wastewater facilities for delivery of sewage into the City's wastewater system from the CCWSD and/or from the City's system into the CCWSD'S system during emergencies. The CCWSD managed and paid for that work and the City paid the CCWSD already incurred costs of $50,935.62. As this interconnection is not to be limited to emergencies, the County will promptly remit the already incurred costs to the City. Q a c� 2, a a L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 v N N J CO CO a� a D a 3.1 - 0 c 0 U a� 0 U a� E r Q Page 8 of 16 Packet Pg. 602 9.A.3.c 3. LINWOOD AVENUE FORCE MAIN QUIT -CLAIMED TO COUNTY. Only the Complex and the School site (until such service is soon to be transferred from the City's system to the CCWSD's system) are supplied with sewer service through a six-inch (6") wastewater force main, referred to in this Agreement as the "Linwood Avenue force main." This force main is now of insufficient size to comply with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection's requirements applicable to transfer of the current combined quantities of sewage gallonage from the Complex and the School site to the City's sewer system. This force main shall not provide any service to the School site, to the Complex, nor to any other site after the Complex and the School site are disconnected from this force main. There is doubt regarding ownership of the property title to this force main. To remove this doubt the City hereby quit -claims to the County (not the CCWSD) all rights, title and interests the City has or may have in this force main. At the County's discretion, some or all of this force main (but not the City's lift station) may eventually be removed from the ground at no cost to the City. The location of this force main and lift station is depicted on Exhibit "D" attached to this Agreement. 4. CITY'S UTILITY BILLING ORDINANCE. The City's current water and sewer service rates are listed on a two (2) page schedule attached hereto as Exhibit "E". The Complex shall be treated in the same manner as other City commercial customers. ARTICLE FOUR ACCORD AND SATISFACTION The City and the County agree that this Agreement settles and forever resolves any and all claims and disputes of every description that each party hereto had, may have had, now has or now may now have, against any other party arising out of, or associated with, the 1977 Basic Agreement (the "BA") and/or either or both of the BA's two (2) amendments, and/or any of the BA's nine (9) addendums, including with regard to any and all utility rates, fees, charges, surcharges, impact fees, water and/or wastewater service, water and/or sewer pressures, water quality, all service area boundaries, and otherwise. ARTICLE FIVE EXHIBITS ATTACHED TO THIS AGREEMENT The Exhibits attached to this Agreement are: Page 9 of 16 Packet Pg. 603 9.A.3.c 1. Exhibit A: The geographic boundaries of the City, the boundaries of the existing water service areas, and the boundaries of the City's existing sewer service areas in unincorporated Collier County. 4. Exhibit B: Depiction of the Horseshoe Drive Areas 5. Exhibit C: Depiction of Horseshoe Drive Interconnection Point 6. Exhibit D: Depiction of Linwood Avenue force main point. 7. Exhibit E: City of Naples Wastewater and Water Rates IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the County (including the Collier County Water -Sewer District) and the City hereby enter into this Interlocal Agreement - Accord and Satisfaction, this day of k1b P1 I UA 2009. CITY OF NAPLES ATTEST: By: Tara A. Norm , City Clerk ATTEST: DWIGHT E BROCK Clerk 7 Approved as to form anjlegal sufficiency: A d, . � C1 C.) Jeffrey A. Klatzkow County Attorney /revised 2/6/09 12:00 p.m. By: BILL BARNETT, MAYOR BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND AS EX-OFFICIO THE GOVERNI-AATER-SEWER/DISTRICT BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNT By:�-r'�t''r DO A FIALA, CHAIRMAN Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Robert D. Pritt, ity Attorney Page 10 of 16 Packet Pg. 604 J `e •/_ n 7) 4g f: y y' i7 r� ` l t a Q r i� a a ' y a u a � e � u 19 AP 1 � Water & Sewer jX4 J � � -� -� SeniceAreaS - f1� Ctly d Nlplei, FIot10a 6 '� f' r Mama rfrrW r 4aaaaa� d I�Y..�. //�� J AI/rlra�aa larl4 N.OhiYm.MF � � � � J ` _ GIs Division k �xc�r�sr• a�a.re�„� �,.r-em ' . ��•Y _ 0 0.3 7 8 1-2 GO D o Paoe 1 1 of 16 W 0 "' Attachment: Collier County 10 yr WSFWP Update (27988 : PL20240000400 10-Year Water Supply GMPA) 9.A.3.c N Exhibit B W g East Naples Industrial Park & ewer Read s Existing Wastewater System = � �g 309:14 309.16 i�lll r i , Legend-------------------------------------------------�°^=^E- - - - - -- 2° - - - - - ' County • Pump Statio City • Manhole I rI I Interconnect 14 Page 12 of 16 Packet Pg. 606 HLZ -5a FM :No 9.A.3.c Page 13 of 16 GhlT :q9 Mfi ;un Packet Pg. 607 9.A.3.c L4- FRANCIS AVE S 9000. ip N Exhibit D W - E S Collier County Goverment Complex 200.00 T �F Page 14 of 16 Packet Pg. 608 AhlT :N �fififi M 9.A.3.c Exhibit E § 30-36. Water service rates. Meter Size Monthly Base Charge (all customer classes Equivalency Factor 5/8"-3/4″ $ 7.05 1.0 1.0″ 17.62 2.5 1.5″ 35.23 5.0 2.0″ 56.37 8.0 3.0″ 112.74 16.0 4.0″ 176.16 25.0 6.0″ 352.31 50.0 8.0″ 563.70 80.0 All customer classes will be charged the base rate according to their actual installed meter size. Monthly Consumption Charge/1,000 gallons All Customer Classes Block I Block 2 Block 3 Block 4 5/8″-- 3/4″ 0-7,500 7,501-15,000 15,001-22,500 Above 22,500 I.0″ 0-18,750 18,751-37,500 37,501-56,250 Above 56,250 1.5″ 0-37,500 37,501-75,000 75,001-112,500 Above 112,500 2.0″ 0-60,000 60,001-120,000 120,001-180,000 Above 180,000 3.0″ 0-120,000 120,001-240,000 240,001-360,000 Above 360,000 4.0″ 0-187,500 187,501-375,000 375,001-562,500 Above 562,500 6.0″ 0-375,000 375,001-750,000 750,001-1,125,000 Above 1,125,000 8.0″ 0-600,000 600,001-1,200,000 1,200,001-1,800,000 Above 1,800,000 Usage rates: Block 1: $1.14 per 1,000 gallons. Block 2: $2.00 per 1,000 gallons. Block 3: $2.85 per 1,000 gallons. Block 4: $3.42 per 1,000 gallons. Irrigation meters are billed in the same way as a potable water meter with the base charges and consumption charges listed here. The bulk potable water rate is $1.85/1,000 gallons. This rate will be adjusted annually as indicated under section 30-33(g), Annual Rate Adjustment by Index. Page 15 of 16 Packet Pg. 609 9.A.3.c Appendix B — Agreement for Potable Water Service Calusa Island Village (Goodland Area) u Packet Pg. 610 9.A.3.c 16 AGREEMENT FOR POTABLE WATER SERVICE CALUSA ISLAND VILLAGE (GOODLAND AREA) A The effective Date of this Agreement is the day of March, 2004. bd - THIS AGREEMENT FOR POTABLE WATER SERVICE to be provided by the County o o to the Development Site is between the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, d' 0 Florida, as the Governing Body of Collier County, as the Ex-Officio Governing Body of the spa Collier County Water -Sewer District and the Goodland Water District hereinafter (the "County") 7e and Calusa Island Village, L.C., a Florida Limited Liability Company ("Developer"). One primary purpose of this Agreement is to contract with the E ten (10) years to recover some of its costs if and when other connect to the subject system. WHEREAS, Developer requests the Development Site (which Development hereto); and WHEREAS, the proposed Development is to grant to the Developer lot(s) or parcel(s) of land water to and for the described in Exhibit "A", attached of a supply of potable water from the County to the Development Site. The total anticipated water demand from the Development Site may not be available from the now existing Goodland water utility facilities, and these facilities may have to be rehabilitated, renewed and/or upgraded before the County can provide the total potable water demand required by the Development Site; and WHEREAS, all lots except those noted in the Chart (page 4) are grandfathered against reimbursement to Developer and each such lot has a claim to water capacity from the facilities that is superior to the reserved water rights of the Development Site, and one (1) or more of such vested lots/parcels could possibly request water service from these facilities anytime during the ten (10) year reimbursement time frame: and WHEREAS, County shall supply the subject potable water to the Development Site by purchasing potable water from the City of Marco Island pursuant to assignment to that City of a former agreement between the County and a private utility, Florida Water Services Corporation (FWSC). The City of Marco Island has recently purchased the Marco Island Utility System from FWSC and as a result the source of the subject potable water is now and is anticipated into the foreseeable future to be that City; and 1 0 a a. c� 21 Q. a 3 Cn L a� a a� 0 0 O O O O 0 v N O N J a 0' 0 v M n LL O c 0 U as 0 c� c as E 0 Q Packet Pg. 611 OR: 3518 PG: 18 9.A.3.c 16C2 WHEREAS, before the total demand of the subject potable water can be supplied by the County to the Development Site, the Capital Improvements described in Exhibit "B". Goodland Water Booster Pumping Station Upgrade — Phase I, from Greeley and Hansen, (attached hereto) may or may not have to be completed, depending of the extent, if any, that vested lots may request service and the fact that the total actual excess capacity in the existing facilities has not been quantified; and WHEREAS, Developer agrees to pay all project costs associated with design, permitting and construction of the growth components of the Capital Improvements (the component parts of which are described in Exhibit "B", attached hereto) to enable the County to provide adequate pressure, quantity and quality of potable water by improving, he current facilities to meet the (increased) build -out demands of the Development Sit ent and future uses), which maximum average daily demand is projected by the eloper proximate but not exceed sixty-eight thousand three -hundred and thirty (68, gall s per da PD) and an anticipated average daily demand of 10,400 GPD for Calusa Is age; and WHEREAS, Developer and Co `stimat at the projected costs of design, permitting and construction of the growth ort' ese capital improvements will total approximately $173,200, and ed t °_ sum, but Developer's obligation under this Agreement shall not exceed $ ,000; WHEREAS, the total, actua costs s all be advanced to the County by Developer according to the payment schedule specified herein; and WHEREAS, the total of these costs shall be adjusted as appropriate (by mutual agreement of the parties) based upon determination of the final, actual costs; and WHEREAS, if at anytime within ten (10) years from the effective date of this Agreement, any representative of any non -vested lot(s) or parcel(s), identified below in the Chart (page 4) (the legal descriptions of which are in Exhibit "C" attached hereto), applies to the County (or later possibly to the City) for any County authorization and the respective County approval will require that the respective non -vested lot or parcel will require water service from the subject water system, a pro-rata share shall be applied to each such non -vested lot or parcel of real property and the Developer shall be reimbursed by the landowner (or representatives of the landowner) prior to the County providing water service to the respective non -vested lot or non -vested parcel of land. It is possible that within the ten (10) year reimbursement time frame 4 Packet Pg. 612 OR: 3518 PG: 18 9.A.3.c 16C2 the subject facilities and service area may be transferred by the County to the City by Interlocal Agreement. In that event the County shall make such transfer subject to this Agreement; and this Agreement shall to the greatest extent allowed by law shall be binding on the City during the 10 year reimbursement time frame; and WHEREAS, the applicable payment shall be determined by the future estimated average daily water demand for each non -vested lot or parcel, and shall be paid by the respective non - vested property owners directly to the Developer for the purpose of reimbursement to the Developer for such property's pro-rata hydraulic share of the Capital Improvements paid for by Developer under this Agreement. It is not anticipated that any non -vested lot/parcel will be eligible for water service from the subject utility facilities, but ' the event that any non -vested lot(s)/parcel(s) listed in the Chart (which are described in "C") should be eligible for and require water from the subject facilities, that parcel pay to veloper the applicable pro- f share of the improvements in accord wi the Ch subject to adjustments rata hydraulic p � J determined by the final actual costs; and WHEREAS, no such County approval with regard to any non -vested lot or non -vested parcel of property shall be vested unless and until County staff is convinced that the applicable reimbursement has been received by Developer. The County shall not operate as a collection agent. Although County will administer this Agreement in good faith, the County shall not be liable to Developer or any other individual or entity in the event that any reimbursement(s) is/are not paid to Developer; and WHEREAS, no such application received by County staff after the ten (10) year anniversary of this Agreement shall require any non -vested lot or parcel of land to make any reimbursement to Developer pursuant to this Agreement; and WHEREAS, the amount of reimbursement money to be paid by each respective non - vested property shall be the total future contribution calculated on the basis of $2.53476 per gallon per day average daily water demand (based upon the estimated $173,200). The amounts calculated below are estimated to be 3 Packet Pg. 613 OR; 3518 PG; 18 9'A.3.c 16C2 Chart Area / Property of the Non- Vested Lots/Parcels Future Estimated Average Daily Water Demand Future Contribution for Growth Component Calusa Island Village 10,400 gpd $ 26,361 Calusa Island Marina 18,200 gpd $ 46,133 Palm Ave. Tract 2,930 gpd $ 7,427 Future County Park 8,000 pd $ 20,278 Moran Condos (48 units) 28,800 gpd $ 73,001 Totals 68,330 g d $173,200 IL--% %� Only each above -listed non -vested lot/parcel must pay,to the original Developer its respective pro-rata share of the actual total costs for the subject Capital Improvements in the event that the respective non -vested lot/parcel is to have access for service from these utility facilities. The applicable pro-rata share shall be allocated to the Developer in relation to the original contribution as adjusted by mutual agreement of the parties, as appropriate, to reflect the final actual costs, and WHEREAS, the Developer shall be eligible to be reimbursed its actual expenditures for the specified items, which, as specified in this Agreement, shall not exceed $200,000; and WHEREAS, the entire Developer Site must connect to the County Water Facilities upon completion of the Project, subject to payment to the County of all then applicable charges related to water meters, tapping charges and other generally applicable charges for such service; and WHEREAS, with regard to these capital improvements, the County shall not impose any water or wastewater impact fees against the Development Site; and WHEREAS, Developer has accepted the terms and conditions in this Agreement as part of the County's review and approval of the Developer's land use petitions. 0 Packet Pg. 614 OR; 3518 PG; 180 WITNESSETH I�U NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. The above WHEREAS Clauses are incorporated herein as if set out herein. 2. The Developer agrees that the County shall design, permit, and construct the Capital Improvements to the Goodland potable water facilities as needed to upgrade the County's existing water system as described above, with the Developer funding the growth portion of said costs, and Developer agrees to connect the Development Site to the County's existing water utility system, at Developer's sole expense and at no cost to the County. 3. Pro-Rata Reimbursement to Developer for tater P Capital Improvements. Representatives r g each non -vested lot or non - vested parcel of land, if any, that re res water service from these Capital Improvements shall be required pay ' s pro-rata reimbursement to the Developer if, within (10) years fro effective date of this Agreement, a representative for one or more below- 'bed lot(s) or parcel(s) of land then requires water service from these Capital Improvements, and at any time within this ten (10) year time frame applies to the County for any permission or approval that will require the respectivel%t(s) or parcel(s) of land to connect into the Capital Improvements for water service. 4. The potable water service to the lands within the Calusa Island Village ("Development Site") shall be connected to the County's potable water utility system at a connection point approved by the County. 5. Developer shall be allowed thirty (30) days to review and comment upon the reasonableness of the proposed project budget and specifications. 6. Subject to adjustments as specified, the Developer shall make a payment of the estimated amount ($173,200) to the County in exchange for the County providing potable water service at adequate pressure, fire flow, quantity and quality of water for service to the Development Site. Subject to adjustments as specified, this estimated sum of $173,200 shall be paid to the County as follows: 5 Packet Pg. 615 OR; 3518 PG; 18 9.A.3.c a. Eighty-six thousand six hundred dollars ($86,600) shall be delivere Jt6 o staff within thirty (30) days of execution of the Agreement by the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners; and b. The remaining unpaid balance shall be delivered to staff before any Certificate of Occupancy is issued with regard to the Development Site. If a the final, actual -costs are NOT known at that time, the second installment 0 21 payment shall be $86,600. If the final costs are known at that time and a Cn total less than $173,200, Developer shall pay such smaller balance due. If the final actual costs exceed $173,200, the Developer shall pay the remaining balance up to, but not to exc , a total of both payments of $200,000. If Developer's costs (no ated) are less than $173,200, the difference shall be reimbursed to eloper within thirty (30) workdays after those actual costs have been finalized. 7. Although the Developer desires that the subject potable water be available to serve the Development Sit not later then October 1, 2004, the County cannot make a firm promise to meet that date or meet any other estimated deadline date. However, the County will proceed in good faith to try to provide service to the Development S�as reasonably possible. To the extent that effective service can be provide the Development Site from the now existing facilities, and subject to pri of v sted lots, and notwithstanding completion of the subject capital improvements but subject to the Developer paying the applicable fees to the County as sched0ed, Developer shall be allowed to make connections to the subject water- system and receive the concurrent applicable Certificates of Occupancy. 8. The Developer will pay all costs associated with installation of water meters and water tapping charges by the County as applicable at the date of connection of the Development Site to the County's potable system. 9. The County and the Developer agree that, to the greatest extent allowed by law, all the terms, covenants and conditions herein contained are and shall be binding upon their respective assigns or other transferee(s) of this Agreement, including, with regard to the County, the City of Marco Island should within the ten (10) rel Packet Pg. 616 10 11 OR: 3518 PG: 18 9.A.3.c 16C2 year reimbursement time frame, this system is sold to or otherwise transferred to the City of Marco Island by Interlocal Agreement. In such event the County will expressly make such Interlocal Agreement subject to this Agreement to be binding on the City to the greatest extent allowed by law. If either party (successor, assign or transferee) desires to give notice or to make any tender to the other party hereto, such notice or such tender must be in writing and shall be deemed delivered when actually received by the other party via hand delivery or by delivery through the United States certified mail, return receipt requested, and addressed to the party for whom it is intended as follows: Collier County Water -Sewer District Attn. Public Utilities Administrator 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Building H Naples, FL. 34112 Calusa Island Village 5130 Main Street, Suite 6 New Port Richey, Florida 34652 Copy to: Leo J. Salvatori, Esq. 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 330 Naples, Florida 34103 Nothing herein shall be construed to prevent either party from changing above - stated place in Florida to which subsequent notice should thereafter be addressed, but no such notice of change of address shall be valid unless given in accordance with the terms of this paragraph 10. Failure of County or Developer to comply with any provision of this Agreement shall be sufficient basis upon which the other party may terminate this Agreement except to the extent, if any, that such failure or delay(s) have been caused by Act of God, war, strike, fire, flood, weather, lack of supplies, breakdown or shutdown of equipment, failure and capacity of transportation facilities, or any law, rule or regulation, or order or action of any court or agency of instrumentality of any government, or any other cause beyond the control or the party hereto responsible for or charged with such failure or delay. However, the nature of this Agreement requires both parties, and their successors and/or transferees, must administer this 7 Packet Pg. 617 OR; 3518 PG; 18 9.A.3.c Agreement in utmost good faith and that termination of this Agreement shall 6 Cto last resort remedy. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto, acting under authority of their respective authorized offices, have caused this Agreement to be duly executed as of the day and year first above issued. First Witness Printed (typed) name o Calusa Island Village, L.C., a Florida Limited Liabi 'ty Compan BY: f) L(L.S.) Robert-M. Re6d, II, as Manager STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) The foregoing agreeme was acknowledged before me this het day of 3armary, 2004 Eby ROBERT M. REED, II, as Manager of the Island Village, L.C., who is K-fe-rsonally _,-known to me OR r /as Identification: LEOJ.SALVATOAI 1 COMMISSION # CC 967892 My C i� amber 28, 2004 nO Notarj Public Underwrors y: Ara ale t�� t ' S Notary Public, State of F Typed, printed or stamped name of Notary Public BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLI OUNTY, FLO IDA 1p.(-BY DO A FIALA, Chairman Appro ved v 6',fbfti ana legal sufficiency: C. Palmer, Packet Pg. 618 OR; 3518 PG; 180 Assistant County Attorney 0 16C2 Packet Pg. 619 OR: 8518 PG: 181 9.A.3.c EXHIBITS FOR CALUSA ISLAND VILLAGE AGREEMENT 16C2 Exhibit "A" — Development Site — Calusa Island Village. [Attached] Exhibit "B" — Capital Improvements. [Attached] Exhibit "C" —Legal Descriptions of the Non -Vested Lots (listed in the Chart). [Attached] 10 Packet Pg. 620 z GRAPHIC RC a.s rm ) IT". ti LEGEND ocrAa •A• yor ro scut•: T \ \. \, S \ S frx a `�rrr—,,"'`ice CALUSA ISLAND VILLAGE OR; 3518 PG: 1811 psrAl v — ro f WA'wFAY \. WEST 129.5' NNUnA�� tllpCX ,- +e io S r-� 1 dArtS �.�zn;_ne ,1 + uo�r�'wn�un Zn;-�NCs tp �wA 0 950 Encore Way i nR .YB o.ns Naples, 25 -20W �aeoal u� m LN 03 0T Ph.. pim L. 10 -2ppp HOLE K40NTES FbMa c.Nir b a wfrr.uc iemnw .,.�......s AutlwiirAom N.iTR W V` \. \. S S. S �`�. 1 ✓ 9{4 � S. mF i N t CD IA 51N ' a`-' J .f m Co F1 00 .+visa t.r r.m+ras ti<ruc ®.smam m.Knm Cm s Q v LLLL .. _ ...� ®...a Mmlr— BOUNDARY SURVEY C A-i42�-i � 0 oZ w m O U c a� E t a Packet Pg. 621 9.A.3.c C7 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT41 a -10 PUBLIC UTILITIES ENGINEERING DEPART��IENT i r-4 H Goodland Water Booster Pumping Station Upgrade - Phase I a N xGreeley and Hansen LLC w .lull- 2003 a Table 2 Breakdown of Preliminary Estimated Project Costs by Rehabilitation/Repair and Growth - - -- ftertr- ----- - --- - - ---�osls c-iueio ----- - Costs -due- row -Fit -Cos&W-6 to GrQivtft Total Estirnaled Rc}tabi}itatian/Repair , in Goodland' in Key Mareot Costs Replace Exterior Valves j 550,000 �� $50,000 Replace Fuel Tank ------$21,900 $8,100 $30,000 �Replace/Upgrade Pumps $55,900 $18,200 $6,800 S80,900 (Electrical' $221,000 S48,900 S18,100 $288,000 Instrumentation and Control F $58,000 $20,400 $7,600 t $86,000 Piping $5,0o0 $Q $0 $5,000 Building Improvement Allowance j $0 S 11,000 $4,000 $15,000 Temporary Bypass Pumping During FSubtotal I Construction $5,000 $7,300 $2,700 $ I s,000 S394,900 f S127,800-$47,300 $569,900 Contingency (15 9 0) -� S59,200 S 19,200 l S7,100 F $85,500 . Total Estimated Construction Cost $454,100 $146,90 1 $54,400 1 $655,400 Engineering/Design S63,000 S19,700- - $7,300 i $90,000 !Construction Services $21,000 $6,600 S2,400 530,000 T Total Estimated Project Cost $538,100 $173,200 $64,100 $775,400 Approximately 73% of the growth is estimated to occur in Goodland and 27% is estimated to occur in Key Marco. E 'Costs provided by RKS Consulting Engineers, Inc. Q 0 N Goodland W13PS Upgrade 10. Jul Packet Pg. 622 ! Final PDR EXHIBIT C PAGE I OF 14 9.A.3.c 02 1 a. Z. J 21 CL CONDOW,08 NITS) - - ----- - % CD O 04 C.4 a., 00 00 SEE MAP \Ql a (L vzl vm"Tff'z\ r 5.1 LL E CL N 0: 10AURIA 18L#LND gj�:1574-. VILLAGE 7, 21 0 De Lee m x CALUSA ISLAND -r 0 MARINA co PALM AVE. TRACT , .,-(PALMR RANCH E ZM DDEVELOPMENT): C4 C4 MAIRE PARK M BY: PR"CT Na CHECK C4 950 Enoore Way FAF. 2002AM 8 34110 C4 ni NON -VESTED DRAW BY: CAD RLE NAW-* Phom� 239 Cw254-2000 =a 0202WAint 4 Florl fffloate of LOTS DALE EXHIBIT - ITEM � Packet Pg. 623 Au"mrbus"on No. 1772 PrapLrad'Y Ks+aK+, peyt. d PAW Etuio bst � �i D ?ta Cw4tnn4 °-wry Rrm �0 3M S,�A', T*d R+V °J Y PRIM 1311 Q� MT� � p00 !r�-D -- A.D., 1988. 1:3F5 XJS3 T0P3t✓ ands this ilk day ai* �.bniary r �ermnrt a&Gx'i�teq (,�,4iD 6 1C�vl4Sx`W�&S' C©"•e a Florida aorpoeation, haRr,.Snattor raEmrre4 to Rs tkis •(Ir.ntoc' pnd WI IMS y9cr " I • as 33ot!?c U�enaral T+x::t:��.1Fr vhoae moping Address yi 1.4. Aae �a a r d3�G, Kc,+icr.. i :torl,da llb�l h0"A Itse re""4d to as the « ')C_rantee' . y :hat Fhb said OrAntoCt tar and in OmnaldOestitl_1 of the suet or Ten Doilmra (®16.U0) and othar good mnd valuAble conaisieea}ion, to it lt1 hind Fai4 by the said urantaa, the « xacuipk sn+ �au!ficienay xhar¢o� is hereby acknowledged, hai A co �= tr horgains�6r eold and oonveyod to the .paid Granteot to k0 as gran.rt3, tst �nuccaeeor�, anA R63i9nm GorevRr, tha tolloairg described land w a e� uituata, lying and being in the county of Collier and Stara Of \�. =':.CC idA, to —Witt fi (gk� CXWIRIT "A• ATTACHED 1METO AND EX ' MUIMC& K"S A PART HEREOF) 'F+ Thin daet3 in es®cited subject to the following terms and comil'tionst 4 Thp drentma shall be responsible for rho ad valorem Z Larma brtl all vlisescmente, if anyr imposed upon the :eal property withthe 198a tax year. t. Thv Grantee takes the property subject to all nasemontu, nosing mnd o'.:1:or reatrictione, and reservations of record. :he a&t•.d Grantor does hereby fully warrrnt the title to said l�ndr and will deraind the samo agalnnt the lawful claims pt all g ,raono nhoozoevsr. µ.yVgl To IQDLID the premises herein granted unto the urPratos:� its aucceaeors and aamigna in �fas� ®iaple toraver. ej R>ceived $ _! �'—�'��-Documanteh• Stamp Tax Received $ Gase "C" In�n�J bin �ronal Pronarty Tex COLLIER U,NTY CLERK OF C RTS BY ` 1 ' TT---^.st-;c•�mz-..-r-+�ry,c�-ew+-tt!srx'-•Y;C".�`�'t;!'a^aTr+a� - - . - - 9.A.3.c EXHIBIT C PAGE 2 OF 16C [—POOR QUALITY ORIGINAL Packet Pg. 624 EXHIBIT C PAGE 3 OF 14 1a :' .� • �. y khs 4santoe bag cegaed these a:zd ita ozesanta to fhe aignoa is itm naste by itI2 a,uthorisad flggir-ata y cor 'e•-8 aaal to ba p.4fizad the day And year abovo written' i�:ied, asal�d znd d3) ivar!c! SIEI,TOliA K.k1il n Ir Ijy'AaTV'g T �0.V. �+ � s F[asidant ATT98Tt Corpocate Ena[eterX,.(• I.;` ( ....... j flSita 3 0a F•iMIDA " 13a . CG:?ZsTg OF DADE � 29t1: day ry oC PeFsra� e o I IxgREG'1 CERTIFY that on taiaeIILea EAPL?. D. :OR,RZGH'Pr JR. ig3a, before 'a pe ao Pre BP ArD^+ Prasident an3 Corperate ac�ioeidae an6 AI E;?.r.LE R. GARalS, signed the, respE:ctzvelvr o me TOSo LARD �e the Tper ons Rxh+o ed the cor9cr at.ion+ fo.ryoinc. instrumenr as such off.icere aad acknowladga[fixed execution thereofto etheir Jfree therein mentionudmetaand and te they affixed such o¢Lic_ra for the purposes id betrumenthe officiactgand dee$cAl of aof saidocorporation. that the as s t irus WITOSSS my andci.natote nd official Zeal Miami, in the County of Dade and Si,ate Ot Florida, the dayy and pace last r.sores:tid. , I if llh ll I.YlClrtil �'• " `` •! — .�. ate of 1'. of da xotary Pucka.m at Large AO WT Ml CC STATE or fl CACOA BY• ir'an L qr CC N[(:s (oi SV, CCY 10. 1Y91 my corsri®sign R YOA5L0 rOU cuuu tEt. uc�. a Q POOR QUALITY ORIGINAL Packet Pg. 625 9A3.c EXHIBIT C �. PAGE 4 OF 14 r - sxaaa�Q °m' ■I� lvt6�Il 16C t. 75-ael of acnd, lying t6 on$ bainQ �srt aF tha pi,s+t of NAACD ,r4.'K �UHiT 31?(TRA!!, Mae"ding to the Plat that aoC sa r�tln[OsQ 1n c?.5t Kook C, Pn e6 11 thrQugn Ile or, the Publid A0oor4s of C�►lilar C,u;tty, pjort.dar end Pact of the+ o ,at of 7ARC0 DeAClS UNIT"S�Ni'yr r,•M:nriz6FacougF. lO-il a[ethe Fub3iG IteaordePnRt oQi1LeK t., it SQ9C7 county, slwrida, bang tsOre 1✓artiCUleC1Y daaaribad a faliotta� gjtkejjf! at the Northeast cornor ae Rectio24, Ton,trhip 5 onutha Rand d5 Pls.at. collim: county, Tloridar aa Bacterly ��..s' h0'.'.Rdsry of asorsasid N6re0 heaeh Unit Bteeng ir: thgncc tun slong uaid sastarty pleat bounder} $C5'IQ"_93"S n .L �0:G",C 532.1) fest1 the a c a leaving rraicl Caeterly plct bounss�nr_y B55 33'4�3'i:' a d�ah�urdec� of �aaeid30 ®ct CnttoAn 6icte�thlraactiOn thence a tta t! A uvF7tPl!RrlY Ple_ Y Mang ^GSd 9autherly p%tit boundary cue N®2.2fi'27'It +t diatance of 2aatf thence; ±vaving said Southerly Pbe-t bounderY run WOS°4Z'4i°Y7 n �E,lntarcn of 403.93 Suet! thancn N27.22'45'B n 84atnnce a,new'SZEtCe �of sS5.67 thenceg r thence cn 019'C3102's adistenceof25.O dia�znce of 16.65 foett thence g54.09'et 24 a .51 ��istcnnca of i0.5x Ceett thence 839001'14'E a disleatance C thence f%'Itt thence F;53`49'0'5 a distance oP thQnc g DI05 tt.of, 27.85 I2Q'N •a RSL z H03M50' "diatarae of 139.•59 feett dieotunce 'og 957.73 Eehtt thanes^ 687°01' 44'4g a distance East" th�nca'38S'?2`3a�ofa2a08afeettketnceofthR Ce N84°54'10'rica S8!.'44'O8'St a diatance a distance^of 30.86 c;istanco of 33.20 'eatt thence''N74'4?'S8'Yt gaet� thence `NS3.12'28"W s distance o� 32.30 feet) thence Fi76.31' Z7"t4 a diwtrancn of 17,41 faett thence ti77 e- 0752 a ciL�taneQ of 37.95 #sett thence N67031'52'H a diatance of 52.0e �setl Lhrnce t�'63.37'!5'I4 s diatance of 35.56 festt thence t�53"63' 36nk a di stance of 30.56 `feat; thence U43.00 r 19"W a 531-631 0f'. 24.85`-Feet; thence 934031'54'w a distance of 14g.60 Eee't to an intetaaction with the 'Boutheely [tight of Kay Linn of -A 5100'` wide Right of S(50 as shown on Bantu BorAd .No. 92 arco Beach [fait T'wentyt th-ante run the nfcraaaid plat of M gollotting _courses along said $outharly point curvaturenOf wa5'03'S;°F: a diatance of 186.86 Peet to a Po s circular curve, 'concave to the ac rthea4t and having a radius of ly along the arc of said curie 369.31 f.ietf thence 9outheaKter through a e Snoint oagzangencyte Of 3thenceasa6 37 09'Saaadiatance�Of f,yt to the po 7 toot to the 6natarly plat boundary aP° aforesaia Marco stach Beech Onit Sixteen, said plat boundary also Bain¢ the Xy line of Section 13 of F COCOHeithences005'"2o'43°Bbalonggsati zaat, C0111mr County. ttaetucly 21nt boundary :and section line a distance of 1293.51 Eoc"c to the point oP 9rgir-ning.. containing 15'.02 serve, morn or less. �� p"'4•t! 6 cyn11 ur rn;� es cawitr. FL0,1f04 JAIVLIC bftC%CIERIK POOR QUALITY ORIGINAL Packet Pg. 626 9.A.3.c EXHIBIT C 1 PAGE 5 OF 14 n4. This instrument prepared by: DAVID C. BOURGRAU SWAM & BOURGEAU, P.A. 2375 Tamiaami Trail N., Suite 308 Naples, Florida 34103 Property Appraisers Parcel Identification Number: y6s�7,7�1 vsi<�S WARRANTY DEED 2711140 OR: 2741 PG: 0874 U=M 11 MIM UcM of ODtM oom, n 11111/2NA At ".SIM M 07 1. M=, dui CM TISi1i.N Ue M I�.N 10[-.t1 StIS.N UU: net THIS WARRANTY DEED made this 31st day of October , 2000, by GOODLUM. INC.. a Florida carnorat5=L. hereinafter called the Grantor, to _ PALMER RANCH. L.1,-C, , an Illinois Mmit_aA T.;nt%i T i f-., CotmyanV . whose post office address is Gss center Road, Frankfurt, IL 60423, hereinafter called the Grantee: WITNES38TH: That the Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of $10.00 and other valuable considerations, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants, bargains, sells, aliens, remises, releases, conveys and confirms unto the Grantee all that certain land situate in Collier County, State of Florida, viz: SEE EXHIBIT "A° ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN Subject to zoning, building code and other restrictions imposed by governmental authority, outstanding oil, gas and mineral interests of record, if any, restrictions and easements common to the subdivision, and ad valorem real property taxes accruing subsequent to December 31, 1999. TOGEM ER, with all tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the same in fee simple forever. AND the Grantor hereby covenants with said Grantee that the Grantors is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the Grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land, and hereby warrants the title to said land and will defend the sane against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever; and that said land is free of all encumbrances, except takes accruing subsequent to December 31, 1999. ==POORUALITY ORIGINAL Packet Pg. 627 1 9.A.3.c EXHIBIT C PAGE 6 OF 14 1 1 6. OR: 2711 PG: 0875 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Grantor has signed and sealed these presents the day and year first above written. ed in .tjsi Penof ; W ness #1 .re Witness #1 - Prin fdName Witness 2 igna re Witness #2 - Printed aII►e STATE OF FLORIDA CO[i MY OF COLLIER GOODLANb, INC., a Florida 1007 oration, J.B.'Curcie, as its President P.O. Box 126 G29d2and F14xida 34140 Post Office Address (Caiporate Seal) The foregoing i rument was acknowledged before me this L_ day of , 2000, by J.Z. Curcie, as President Of 6QOBLA16, INC_, a Ploxfda corporation, who ism onally kxzo� to me or who has produced _ —as identification. Notary p�u�bblic Signature Notary Public Printed Name ~� (seal) My commission expires: a7 CRAR K WWON Ma �,v M'coiMM�I�or�arnbn �r417�wMMbr�lfetMbrM� POOR QUALITY ORIGINAL Packet Pg. 628 1 EXHIBIT C PAGE 7 OF 14 '** OR: 2741 P0: 0876 *** EXHIBIT To ctl that certain real ra Y p jscity silualc,l in and bcirrg it lire canary ojCollitr� Stafc of'Rorida, described asfollows. L The upland portion of a parcel of land lying in Tract 2, of Black " Y", C70ODLAND ISLES, as recorded in plat Book 6, Page 7, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Beginning at the Southeast corner ofl 0124, GOODLAND ISLES, MST ADDITION, as rdcorded in Plat Book 8, Page I, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida; Thence South I6 degrees 06' 17" West 64.a0 Meet to the Point of curvature of a cicular curve concave to the Northwest having a radius of 50.00 fet4 Thence along tie arc of said curve to the right fora 4C[iistSnce of23.21 feet thru a central angle of 26 degrs 3542' ; Thence South 15 degrees-44'4T' East 27.88 few Thence South 16 degrees 06'17" West 94.03 fret; Thence"South 55 degrees 38'23r East 2I6.47 feet; Thence North 16 degrees 06'IT' East 295A3 fact to the point of curvmm of a cizrular curve concave to the Southwest having a radius of 100.00 feet; Thence along the arc of said curve to the Loft for a distance of 181.41 feet thru a central angle of 104 degrees 00'00"; Thence North 87 degrees 53'43" West 117.28 feet; Thence South 02 deax= 06' I7" West 95.00 feet to the Place of Begilzning. POOR QUALITY ORIGINAL Packet Pg. 629 1 9.A.3.c '� 4 rr�v .uw,•'woe .',�.�rrLNlck t#_ (fettle. Attorlwy - � rr isaei r•"a 495 north Collier Ilvd. Norte [Stand, FL 336137 nQ �p��2�{&� �ppl�r�� vAbla irmal PreraLld b" u O` BOOK PAQE- -ltal ter Q. Somkoty 945 Central Avenue i Receifed {1 60-0oetaw-yStay TAX Naples. Ft 39940-6294 pl et,Kt f —„ lu Phu •t' tltt4lbte fmm.t. 11PpnAmm r amd k%-Vr %;m (rdioe NwbwMi K lrOg PrPPert7 'tax. aR9CK, LEA OfF LT 1CiFtT &Nbdm s- C -0 8 X agar e.. ,La r aw+oas�e au ■,.rl tr a ssv+[ tNt w M sr. l N7(t�r �IIiiETl4tECe• Xadle tkii 12th a1 April All 1p 97 tigh a tatrraaee ra. Meureasr of d- Cwn 4f v in ire star ar Ohio ' Pari y 4f 0afirst pare 0d Maureen Moran, Inc. rfdwCosrnty4f Collier ,istheSale4f Florida tout Pool Cff-edtrtq_is c/o, the Berge at 0oodltnd Bridge, 3200 State ad. 92, 600dtaed, FL 33937 r4rt y al f flu eetoad part db rf 151trantl:4. Y%at the said port of As first part frda br mid in emt,.Neras ax a tke Ten and 00f100------------------'(S10.00)-----------------------------------Domm to h i m fit Band Paid ty the Amid partY Qf As gxm* i Pa*4 t56 rms of to VW is An* =4m*4 has graxieck bwpsf%4 and sold to the odd godly 4f W weaad pm; t is Adis Led aaeigne Jbrwo At .��{ �rlloeatrrpdua{hti(sraSsftrale,asd6etgiatbeColm � Collier SUk j Fiortda to-wLt As described an the attached Exhibit "A" The property described in Exhibit "A`, i � eoercial property. 1� Lucluding all tfparisn and autuargad land rishts of which Craatn is Seised. N C And the Laid"r 4 the 1[rtt port does hereby Jietly tmrm d fhe Ntld to said land and wM ddkad q tho samc agsinti the IauyhlCAnus gf all pavmrs w1osesoescr. NU ntmas m4ereA ne maid party herewm w his hasd and sm! flea dell wed lKa+ first absss+mittex siflrecd: rent nxd del a cn rbeansesxx 4l: r. ./ r L rrcrue Q Neurahr 117 Lurie Lane, Sandusky, ON 44870 w K � ✓ u TCAr M srn'►'ttov Ohta _� a Ihe.clOCatRflh+e.a(h�dgl.ad�.■•..s.aime.y.eun,lcea cotrtrrt'ov1G-^.____— , � •tminisi.►wlh,•edlwhn �.�.,*r..r�.aL«a;+� Laauv So-m•b6e tl,.1+�'Rm_WalkQin,tulvin e.eL.tad lh.emIDi"It Lrtrumant,vho,clawrlolLcl ech��tMaL�__ rt..aacd licwM it.e:Letrtl:nl.ywWM+rr,�(�`•t}knlilknllsidlfi•dw:a.m,d PcnecLtL.� - nr:rcnn�l7vinQli' f--"""--RotX**.�mFn i1A�+Tei ---� �V4rs.nah••xir.[eaS.tal aL.i i�lhr Mtf md6let•t.it•Mciilthi• a �L -r-V— _ MYOONUSSIMDP.9E$APRLet JW - — - ' yY,dE� a7S 4g'r� r'j e, �,.y�t.�. .:b_..�trc•'sY■.�..�e EXHIBIT C PAGE-8 OF 14 POOR QUALITY ORIGINAL Packet Pg. 630 1 EXHIBIT C PAGE 9 OF 14 .ate—srr ..,;, � �•. . ' MT.RIT Ann An undivided one half (1/2) interest in and to the following dancribed propatty'. � Ca W C3 N too last 100.00 Last at Y[tast 'C'r KA&W 11CAM yRIT fit'[ VER, C3 as aasordiatf to the Pop OK plat as —"Clad is plat S. t'agsa 11g thru 124 inclualw, of th. hhllo Mcocda •o[ Ca111cr t.- . riarlota. C=tainitq 0.52 sarat, Mr. or lag. and An undivided one half (1/2) interest in and to the following described property. rartal in fasfcton 1). 70Wnihi9 S1 fauth, Rang- 26 O acagiad by ka¢tae, part as Ludo ComwyW by Dan! In OR 12 tsl. Cwoty• : p rw,x:dnd Do* at nags Oalliat Nblin gacdaea . ' � ..- r. lot fu P.—i or land lyiay on tbo awtth at,% OC r,"ta [ 7 nwd us. 91 in Station 17, t*Wtnhy S2 tooth, "a IL teat, balnq a part of thu'landn wtupiaa Its aacti'atalio W1th that asstala goad raeordad is O.A. book U at lqw* j 1'as OR the paths WOODS& at Calling Canty; dtlsh log at parni 1s dassdbod an follonsa Itme tbo aoaersta aaantoaant With a bweea cp aaarkitrq the qutrtnr-:nctiaw auznas an the bloat iced of Said sectito } N.tan It'i)•11.03' W. nL.aRv sold vast 11an roe 1304S Gat to a maatoset* 7atWnwount rith a beau -P an two ooubsalr elgpt-af-t dy Una 09 it&to Fond PP. 7)1 tbantr wativas on thf Sews street des 59.01 ftbb to a Pauli 0si tbs terterliaf at saga —Al thanes tvn N. 17'e1•*V V. along raid taftura Itfor 561.11 Cant to a brass cap in the pasastat in ' raid coatDx Elms thane, CaatLano an the daft code. 14G Coe- to - polar 79.26 Coot -at of rho vest dad of a 6ridga "rose, Wtto Mats an *.CA Stato goads theaaa cad R. 92'1/'19• W. tear too toot to a point On tho t.ettberly CIJA-at•+rar It"* of Said itata Road Ila. 62s ti—me rw G. 01•41194• V. aloof acid e,,kt.of-ray Una foe LU fast to the IWIWL K " .baglsglaq. stet ssdd paint of tray lnnlay't>ao,tinw l,• 07•41•00 N. a*aid elgat-at-War 11na roe 110.12 roots dance run Ir. siw 9,11, s4 for Car feat xa a --to na-t With a brown Cap [cant on tiro Waatarl7 Una a Bald ptC-al comoyad by Oaad recorded to O.A. loot 11 at Pays lstr thence contlu** an rho seas tonne for - L16.29 fast to anatbsr Lika eomaaat Caahtl t6aaC41 erMir*a ear rho $acs coarse for 11-02 fast# theta can 8. 1T•U's0' :. permit" W1th ■sid right-er-Way It.. of stet* teed Ila. 11 fee 110.12 feats tkabod rvn t- as-19,I9' t. far 111 foot - w oho paint of beyinntey on aald [taco- MR,/ facia-st—Of :ins, cwtalslag 1.*1 acraa. rho rattkaely SCaa Of the haralnabova daoeelbad perm roes - Sa tl,* "Ron, of Kaeco niver oe PARK. Wllch at this leutlaa is KoMtioss Galled Ccadlaffd *ey. in cock A loolttoa on is inuluda Ia the described parcel aftarlstinr MOCrRto .ar Wall of irro*alat aligtwnt, A11 boaringa hatainabava ,aontimmd eft sae tbw Ylsrids cast Tom ►1aAs 1VaxddaRto Systas dotivod frog V. S. Csaat A,cRn6.LID dutaay trlenquiatIM Rattans try ptscfj'e tratwrett. - Re It .,j �• YdtW� i. Q [POOR QUALITY ORIGINAL - Packet Pg. 631 9.A.3.c _ ... w,MIMMpn�a�eL6 ni.t,ra m„r ...a ter. "Mritt If. Mill@, Attorney `�" s9s rrortn Colliar slue. di DR BOCK PAGE MMO Island, FL 33911 k.ta nIftuVan iielta! B. bmkoty ""'• 945 Central AT*. Retested tlateatety Stu* Tea Maphta. rL 3MO-6294 � Recrtr,n S Class 'C' Inuagtble +aladnmea.irarotrusmuht: ,rjfit—;rttonal Prop.-rtr Tax odor+keoaE>reT r. F•`--"K, E1S or 6l IT ii!nR -w"At M J" R.1 vawr�.f� '" ems., p�,y�VATA ��yr wa r Im/w,nys/ vc �n. aa► 3911tt tre. Afado We lutt dff cf April A.Q 1293 �M Oeborth Lynn Rowen Daley gf9kCeaaltgf Collier fttkSiam v/ Florida ,vary QrwiCrotprt,asd Maaraaa Moran. Inc. gr&W O*Uy qJ Collier , ix the State of Florida eehae ppoortt adalrscs is c/o ihtr Barge at 600dland Bridge, 32O0 State Rd. 92, 600dtand, FL 33937 �y party of tht actaad part. fro Ten and O(i. Vat du fs a.t�) y-if the � Part fa+• and im canddrYalift of Ltd noel of 'Ibllnr; e° to her in Az*d psld by Ma atiid Part y gf W nosed PM tU re AO AvWf ie hWfY acbwwf�{ o-. La ar¢eaut 6arpcdcad; aid dtYd Sv the raid Par9' 4ftAt redwtdlpasi, its � sui9ur 1Jhr�'• � fil=iq dour W 1.4 siNwt�, and Willis ft Cau q q f to�v(h as described an attached Exhibit •A' the property described in Exhibit "A' Is commercial property. M iubjtct to ^�- ^ta,Teservatioas and restrietioae of record end real estate taree for the. Teat 1993 and subuquent yaws. aM Including -IL riparian and aabrtarged land rights of which Grantor is netted. to a bad Bin add part y of &W first part do as hereby Jody warroW 04 WU to raid land amd w9l d*nd Md taste tgTainu As Fafgti<! dta&nr ojsll peals uhm"wer. .Ud HWReH6 ekett0L 7iia raid Party of Lro fiat Port 6a s 1Jcrdaat7 trt her load aW W du day mid near jCrat abnoa w Um SYpned tesW add qUvcrvailt as prevow1-4 l �',�' orP.A.E'a nhlseeahy '�t� i9T8 rheTea>ro A1vd Unit AIOP_ Itaples, FL 3396E I ar'r7- 7' R W% t7J'AfR �'�.�F nrirla .- _ .._3 IMrbl CeUb tfut,nd,i, dos,Ww.me,rdt4er tubra.Twelyd GOIIPRY OF Goll ier ^� maaRtnSa6caxU,aandtair •at�pe,curllyrtp�ulc! Itonoren.lynlLAAIEY--•------------ --- inrmbwtsbalhtt�'+�sa__.dc_crib•dfrtrnTrdoereMNlh,•twcAaJeK Frlrmted.wlmaiwb,4ed1a16sa�rYul nil,.. Qtdcldc n+t51}nt.lrc8r.,lum+Un(dlaeioften__•ttJ.,[:MIM.tdttr.mn•nan�lperrnt�a*a:.'l3'.117— �ePs's1Q�' �'�� IS'11Masmrban4wlnnSr6d wall Um [?mn{Y nndNteb Iris( •..71ad. r/ aa.r ;&•'- pril— . .e.a.to.43• f:�7'_:%�� ertxwi�emrsur mta:ttmeq two arwno+ca:aa�c..�a ha,al�.^7—fw.l^ EXHIBIT C PAGE 10 OF 14 POOR QUALITY ORIGINAL Packet Pg. 632 . SZrtt1H1Y rA` An jlltdiV1dad OA0 half (1/1) Snterost in and to the following e desc2= propafty. "a rest 300.00 Seat cc tract -C-, nwoo SMII ORiT orimcrH, aapd3i9 to tho nap oe plat li eiedea 3n riot kok S. t 19r1thm 124 &1a.Iva, n of tlm Public oarordmaor Coilior C4%U1Mlr.9 i.S3 m.nrfa, WILD or leaf. and An undiwidod one half 11/21 ihtercat in and to the following described property. raea.l is Saatlas 17, taw kip St South. eat,■ ss 12401t. aec'f.d by ".to&, part of :as1■ wiyod br Died rcra.an4 in as awl 32 at Me 2o►, wa Catuar roomy A Ion cur passel of load lying as sae earth stir 01 Stern Dead No. 93 to Woollen 13, hm mAk(p 52 Smata. "At 29 . rage, bring a part of tl.e'l.nds accupiea In aeeesdmrcto 11th that wrtaln Dead moor"d is O.R. Dealt 32 at yoga M or the pabum, " m .t Coillar eaoaly" Which for i It parwl is dmuib" ae t IC"I fro. the aeaarsto mnaadnt K1th . bran Cap narltlny tim t.ersar-anelr Hens[ m efu rasa line of said Natlas 13, rtas R. ai'22'03- V. aleag amid vast lira for lSo.33 tat to . Momenta nsasrnat Kith a br..a cap an cho aaatharly q#ht-bt-&w 11pt of Meta Rod or. sit thrmoo cwrtiave an tie saes saves lsr s1.01 Set to a point mk the egrtarllag at laid road, U44" Keg M. t1•C1'ss' t. aiow9 Wald rastor- ling for S&I'M (get to a bras nap !n the pavae.nt In r•ld eanusllaat thenal continue " the saw tn?11raa i1W3.74 for to a potat "m lost gnat of the tat wad of a brld9e aoselm Karon Pala on mid ante Raadt thanea ran It. 03`3i•19` V. to 101 feet to a point or ten a. LhOCty right-of-vmy !lv of nil sues Rod Ns. 421 thence run X. 97'41'00` W. .lent nald rlvh%t I-wy Slav tear Ira feat to ek. point of ,SagianLeq. rcm .end paint Of t.eai.nlKICMtLaae $,' W41'119' V. &YN skid rL{na-al-Vey ling tar 3)Lo.1a fakLI then" " X. 0-111' Ir Y. par 0.0 I"t to a calocmto aaau.•tn[ vlth a break cap found as the Weotarty line of Wald parcel oacvoted by D..d sceosdad :a O.R. Door 31 at p+Ca 20►r thence Mel- a fh. saaa [Puna for 13t.2► fact to smoker like Wanw.nt found, thanca cagtlaam d• rhg onto marae for 13.42 fast, alt&wm run N. OT•4&146' 6. parallel Kith said r3iht-r.:-vay line at Su" nand fro. 93 for 310.12 fast[ taasm TWO a. 01012,106 C. for, 144 Post I m t►o Dolan of logitaia9 .a .old state sold right -of -Puy :Iw, oenc.ln/ap 1.03 eecaa. air northerly flan of tea fieraiseltem dmaertbod Darrel seam. a is th. Water. OR Raroo Riper or ragWrl.h at 'hie I.-CLaa is a.a.tl... a11ae g.odlana any. In wet . Socatian NO tb ieclodo So cho dasaribod pascal .n as l.alnp connate foa- .all or itrgclq alLv-." ALL leaders Itacafnabeve kettLenai err for tea■ rlerfds cast coos afar Coar"ont■ Pystat, aaelwd few. it. C. Coast a 06.dataC e.rvaY trfantul.tioe ataU.al by Pont" traverse.. 0 c f�H 4D Ct3 And all of the entire pare@1 described as f0110wes .-�Cgoeutlhi ae a 9"" on dw we line of "atioe 13, Twnaaip /// St lath, lasso 26 cost. Coulot Constr. Florida, a So 60, V 13at.$ fast flea she aletivdat Camas taaraofF choaad [l 00a 1f1 19` Y 2p2.23 Sato eo a polacf thnoca It 43e 31' 43" it 107.2a foot co a pelst$ thanco a 4e 23' 30" V US.34 toot to n galas etwaea a 33" U. d0' V HRG 11 feet ro a polott ,mca trot K ie 40' 3a" w it lie 10' 30" V 117a.16 to a potatl chance 10I.11 feat to a paint 1n trig concorlito of RebraI ►ale Ilaaack cm. 1R.co Road --Rtdat Rand lta.Pii rostra G at 19' 10" R •fort& NA Caaearllea of said road 1s9.ds feat to a pout (60 fast mrr or Lees Kama of a bridso-AMID Kam Mae?. chance R 28 40' SD" I IWO flat a a yoiat as tea naahecly Cfbhc-al-ray of skid "ad to polar of sailaafrss of chi laadv h¢rain daaarlbad .tact sad b ¢sek.d by a 4 Loch "aaratg oonu_" nt rich a braaa cay�, ♦F at�� u • eltt Orr o.yCinglgR R 20 40' 3V IS.0 flat to a oon.vato emu cent fts 0" Kill. a blue saaoqpt go tug above of Coodlaad Say$ thaneo eaatlnu- S l less i ro 40' 30" v M.a Lone to a pah;tf thaeso par.110 to tka nectberly righr of -ray ear ra Ld road 140.0 foci 144.0 flat to a on the to s p.171 [noon, s 1° 40' 30" r paint eaftbuly rlsht-of-wy.ef Royal rala Rr>ee.14 to Y+rca Road: thorn d 810 19' 19- 9 alepb add mttterly r1SAt-of-ray bQ644-rr L60.g flat to point of agtlatdn8. AM containing 0.45 •ceu. / Wm ar lama. EXHIBIT.. C. PAGE 11 OF 14 16C IFT60R QUALITY ORIGINAL Packet Pg. 633 Lte: 2/20/2004 Time: 11:02 AM To Page: 003-005 @ 6490158 EXHIBIT C PAGE 12 OF 14 6-er 16 IMAGE01 : FL-04-3874-2 02/20/2004 11:00:11am 2924999 OR: 2972 PG: 2967 PROJECT: Dolphin Co,,WGoodland 111cm is ametu 11C0111 of CMiill cm, 11, FOLIO: 4637296=1 IU111i11i of oma mat I. na, Cult CM 4111111114.101 me M ISM IOC-.11 12111.11 WIII i.lf utc WARRANTY DEED ra Inlet 13" I1TI11 orrrCl THIS WARRANTY DEED is made this AltL day of iZONP4 . 2002, by DOLPHIN COVE DEVELOPMENT OF GOODLAND, INC., a Florkls oorporstion, whose post office address is P.O. Box 158, Marco Island, Florida, 34146 (hereinafter referred to as 'Grantor"), to COMER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, its successors and assigns, whose post office address is 3301 Tamiami Trad East, Naples, Florida, 34112 (Hereinafter referred to as "Grantee"). (Wherever used herein the terms 'Grantor" and 'Grantee" include all the parties to this instrument and their respective heirs, legal representatives, successors and assigns.) WITNESSETH: That Me Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other valuable consideration, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, Hereby grants, bargains, sells, alone, remises, releases, conveys and confirms unto the Grantee, all that certain land situate in Collier County, Florida, to wit: See Attached Exhibit 'A* which Is incorporated herein by reference. Subject to real estate taxes for the current year and thereafter, easements, restrictions, and reservations of record. THIS IS NOT HOMESTEAD PROPERTY TOGETHER with all the tenements, herodhaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. TOGETHER with an rights or permits to build docks or rights to leases of submerged lands or leases to submerged lands that arise from, relate to, refer to or are connected in any way with Grantors property or plans to develop the property and all other property rights arising from, relating to or connected In any way with the property and plans to develop the property. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same In fee simple forever. AND the Grantor hereby covenants with said Grantee that the Grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the Grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that the Grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawfu( claims of aA persons whomsoever; and that said land Is tree of all encumbrances except as noted above. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Grantor has signed and sealed these presents the day and year first above written. 771t. : rl• F DOLPHIN COVE DEVELOPMENT OF GOODLAND, INC., a Florida corporation BY: Nicole Ginic, President P.O. Box 158 Marco Island, Florida 34146 TMIS COR KYMICE ACCEn" pI TK satsD OF ClOUNY 610I1r1i1!{ZerlRR3" COLLIER CGtar" FLORIDA� WE1-2 _ Iitur Ro. j A Page 1 of 3 O U POOR QUALITY ORIGINA-mon 1 Packet Pg. 634 Lte: 2/20/2004 Time: 11:02 AM To Page: 004-005 IMAGE01 : FL-04-3874-2 02/20/2004 11:00:11am STATE OF)1—'.L. COUNTY OF C. � @ 6490158 OR: 2972 PG: 2968 The foregoing Warranty Dead was acknowledged before me this day of � 2002, by NICOLE WNIC, President, on behalf Development of Goodiand, Inc., a Florida corporation, fio4wWrionafly known to ma oT who has produced as identificatkp, ------- (affix notarial seal) (S gnature of Notary Public) (Print name of Notary Public) NOTARY PUBLIC SeriallCommission # ; if any My Commission Expires: 1 1s W fo�a egil sWfrcrerrcr �tUt Cots ALLAi,.) EXHIBIT C PAGE 13 OF 14 Page 2 of 3 O 16C2 POOR QUALITY ORIGINAI _ , Packet Pg. 635 tte: 2/20/2004 Time: 11:02 AM To Page: 005-005 IMAGE01 : FL-04-3874-2 02/20/2004 11:00:11am EXHIBJT "A" e 6490158 *** OR: 2972 PG: 2969 *** A parcel of land being is portion of Tract 1, as shown on but not a part of the Plat of Goodland Isles Second Addition, as recorded in Plat Book 8, Page 19, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the southeasterly corner of Lot 33, Block F of said Goodland Ides Second Addition; thence S 15' 11' 20" E 390.48 feet; thence S 72' 15' 19" E 128.00 feet thence S 13. 50' 44" E 180.00 feet to the southerly boundary line of said Tract 1; thence 28.70 feet along the arc of a circular curve concave to the northwest, radius of 100.00 feet, chord bearing N 51' 23' 18" E 28.60 feet; thence N 43' 10' 00" E 250.00 feet thence N 12' 20' 20" E 381.83 feet; thence 87.47 feet along the arc of a circular curve concave to the southwest, raditis of 50.00 feet, chord bearing N 37' 46' 41.5" W 76.74 feet; thence N 87. 53' 43" W 66.88 feet; thence 162AI feet along the arc of a circular curve concave to the southeast, radius of 1365,09 feet, chord bearing S 884 41' 47" W 162.31 feet; thence S 95' 17' 17" W 201.52 feet thence N 18012' 43" W 87.42 feet to the southerly right-of-way line of Palm Avenue; thence S 85. 17' 17" W 10.28.feet; thence S 74.49' 12" W 60.08 feet to the northeast corner of said Lot 33, Block F; thence S 18' 12' 43" E 96.75 feet to the southeast corner of said Lot 33, Block F and the Place of beginning. Parcel contains 5.22 acres, nre or less. �. Hearings are based on those shown in Plat Book 8, Page 19 of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. EXHIBIT C 9.A.3.c PACE 14 OF 14 Page 3 of 3 16C2 7OOR QUALITY ORIGINAL 9.A.3.c Appendix C — Agreement for Potable and Emergency Water Interconnects between Bonita Springs Utilities, Inc. and CCWSD �i Packet Pg. 637 9.A.3.c Agenda Item No. 16C3 October 23, 2007 Page 1 of 11 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation to approve an Interlocal Agreement for reconstruction of the existing interconnect between the Collier County Water -Sewer District and Bonita Springs Utilities, Inc to provide for reverse potable water flows at Bonita Springs Utilities expense, to provide for the design and construction of a second interconnect, at a location to be determined, at the expense of the Collier County Water -Sewer District, and to establish rates for usage of potable water. OBJECTIVE: The public purpose of" this Interlocal Agreement is to provide for potable water flows through the existing interconnect from Bonita Springs Utilities, Inc (BSU) potable water system to the Collier County Water -Sewer District (CCWSD) potable water distribution system, to provide for two way ilo f potable water between CCWSD and BSU at a second interconnect. and to e.sta user rates for each Utilities' potable water usage whenever either of the two inters ec a in service. CONSIDERATIONS: Recently, CCWSD staff has been working in the area of Barefoot Beach Boulevard, Bonita Beach Road and Vanderbilt Drive (the northern most areas of the CCWSD) to uncover the reason(s) for nontypical disinfection residuals in the water distribution system providing potable rater to these areas. Minimum free chlorine and combined residual levels are set by the Florida Department of Environmental .Protection and the Environmental Protection Agency. Should chlorine residuals continue to remain low, the utility faces the possibility of falling out of compliance with the disinfection requirements of these regulatory agencies. From a public health and safety perspective, it would be in the best interest of the potable water customers in these areas to have an additional potable water source available to supplement as needed the CCWSD water distribution system. The Interlocal Agreement provides for reconstruction of the existing interconnect to provide for two way flows between the respective utilities' distribution systems. The Interlocal Agreement will replace the August 26, 1997 Agreement for Emergency WaterN connects. On August 26, 1997, Agenda Item 16B 15, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, as Ex-Officio the Governing Board of the Collier County Water -Sewer District (Board), approved an agreement for emergency water interconnect between BSU and the Board. The agreement provided for one way flows of potable water from the CCWSD to BSU for temporary emergency potable water service. The existing interconnect, located on Bonita Beach Road, was designed, constructed, and paid for by BSU so that the water flows in a northerly direction only (i.e., from CCWSD to BSU'). The portion of the interconnect from the Board's water main up to and including the first isolation valve which controls the flow of water from the Board's water system was conveyed to the Board.. The remainder of the Interconnect is owned and maintained by BSU. The Interlocal Agreement also calls for a second potable water interconnect for two way flows to be designed, constructed and paid for by the CCWSD at another location where CCWSD and BSU have adjacent distribution systems, most likely on Livingston Road. This interconnect will be completed by September 30, 2009. Estimated cost for the second potable water interconnect is $300,000.00. Packet Pg. 638 Executive Summary Interlocal Agreement with BSU Page 2 9.A.3.c Agenda Item No. 16C3 October 23, 2007 Page 2 of 11 Simultaneous with the Agreement being recommended to the Board of County Commissioners for their approval, the Agreement is being recommended to the Bonita Springs Utilities Board of Directors, in order to expedite modification work to provide a temporary supplement of potable water to CCWSD. The staffs of the two utilities have agreed to a bulk user fee that is based on a recent Collier County bulk rate study modifiable by C.PI and/or future rate study. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact for the reconstruction of the existing interconnect, as the Bonita Springs Utilities will incur this cost. There will be an undetermined fiscal impact in Fund 408 Operating User Fees, depending on the volume of potable water that is purchased from Bonita Springs Itilitieq. Finally, a budget amendment in the FY08 budget will be set up in the Fun 2, Water User Fees in the estimated amount of $300,{}00.00 to Bind the second int ect. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Ther • s no i t on the Growth Management Plan. RECOMMENDATIONS: (l) That the Board unty Commissioners, as Ex-officio the Governing Board of the Collier Cr$ty Water -Sewer District, approve an Interlocal Agreement for reconstruction of the existing emergency interconnect between the Collier County Water -Sewer District and Bonita Springs Utilities, Inc to provide for reverse potable water flows at Bonita Springs Utilities expense and to establish rates for usage of potable water, (2) To approve Collier County Water -Sewer District recommendation to permit, design and construct a second interconnect, at a location to be determined, at the expense of the Collier County Water -Sewer District, (3) To establish rates for potable water. (4) To approve any budget amendments required in Fund 408 User Fees to compensate Bonita Springs Utilities for bulk water supplied. (5) To approve a budget amendment in the FY08 Budget in the Fund 412, in the amount of $300,000.00 to fund the second interconnect. Prepared by: Peter Lund, Division Operations Analyst, Public Utilities Operations, Packet Pg. 639 9.A.3.c Agenda Item No. 16C3 October 23, 2007 Page 3 of 11 2007 AGREEMENT FOR POTABLE WATER INTERCONNECTS BONITA SPRINGS UTILITIES, INC /:wiI IE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT This AGREEMENT is made and entered into effective on this day of 2007, by and between the Bonita Springs Utilities, Inc., a Florida not -for -profit corporation ("BSU"), and the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, as the Governing Board of Collier County, Florida, and as Ex-Officio the governing Board of the Collier County Water -Sewer t {"CCWSD"), collectively ("Parties''). WHEREAS, the Parties are geograp] ' y n ►hboring ilities and each has existing facilities capable of furnishing limite le of potable water to the other; and, _.. WHEREAS, BSU and CCWSD are parties to that certain Agreement for Emergency Water Interconnects dated August 26, 1997 pursuant to which CCWSD has contracted to provide water on a limited, as -needed basis to BSU ("1997 Agreement"); and, IV WHE , the Parties ' h to modify the existing interconnect to provide for the ability to s ly water in either direction (to BSU or CCWSD) and provide for a second interconnect for such purpose; and, WHEREAS, the Parties agree that it is in each Party's best interests to enter into this Agreement so that either Party can supply potable water to the other Party should the receiving utility require potable water from the sending utility; and, WHEREAS, it is in the best interests of the Parties, their respective water customers, and the region to promote the interconnection of water systems to meet emergency and periodic water supply needs. NOW, THEREFORE, based upon the mutual undertakings and other consideration referenced herein, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Yy Parties agree as follows: 1. Subject to the tenns of this Agreement, BSU agrees to supply to the CCWSD such potable water as BSU determines is available within the Packet Pg. 640 9.A.3.c Agenda Item No. 16C3 October 23, 2007 Page 4 of 11 BSU water system as may be requested by CCWSD from time to time to meet its water supply demands. Said supply shall be delivered in a manner so as to maintain the best available pressure at the discharge side of the Point of Delivery, so as to limit adverse effects to BSU's customers. 2. Subject to the terms of this Agreement, CCWSD agrees to supply to BSU such potable water as CCWSD determines is available within the CCWSD 3 water system as may be requested by BSU from time to time to meet its water supply demands. Said supply shall be delivered in a manner so as to maintain the best available pressure at the discharge side of the point of delivery, so as to limit any adverse effAaLchthe WSD's utility customers. The point oi' delivery shall be the po supplying utility's ownership and responsibility <pnsi r supplie nder this Agreement ends, and the ownership and r of thereceiving utility begins ("Point of Delivery"). Potable water supplied under this Agreement shall be delivered to, and received from, permanent interconnecting facilities at two points where the CCWZie potable water systems are in close geographic proximity , he Point of Delivery for water supplied by ^US) hough either interconnect shall be on the CCWSD side va on the CCWSD side of the interconnect assembly. The Point of Delivery for water supplied by CCWSD to BSU through either interconnect shall be on the BSU side of the isolation valve on the BSU side of the interconnect assembly. BSU agrees to modify the existing one-way flow interconnect facility constructed to supply potable water to the BSU located on Bonita Beach Road so as to provide flow in either direction ("Existing Interconnect"). BSU shall own, maintain and operate all facilities comprising the Existing Interconnect up to the Point of Delivery on the CCWSD isolation valve on the CCWSD side of the interconnect. CCWSD agrees to construct a second interconnect facility in close geographic proximity to the Livingston Road/Imperial Street interchange ("New Interconnect"). The exact location on the New Interconnect shall be as mutually agreed upon by the Parties in writing. 2 Packet Pg. 641 4. 5. 9.A.3.c Agenda item No. 16G3 October 23, 2007 Page 5 of 11 This operational decision may be made on behalf of CCWSD by the County Manager or designee. CCWSD shall own, maintain and operate the New Interconnect up to the Point of Delivery at the BSU isolation valve. The nature of the supply requirement, and the availability of water from the sending utility's system, shall dictate the number and location of the interconnect to be activated. at a given point in time. The receiving utility shall identify the interconnect it desires to activate, subject to limitations in availability of the sending utility. Both interconnecting facilities shall be constructed as long-ten-n interconnections. The Existing Interconnect shall be modifi may be amended, repealed and/or sup BSU standards as d/or as otherwise specified in the Agreement. The New IntercoNProtedures shall be constructed pursuant to the CCWSD Utilities Standards and Ordinance, as may be amended, repealed and/or seseded, unless and/or as otherwise specified in the Agreement. Each y shall submit the plans and specifications for their respective interconnect to the other for review and comment prio�eding with the project. a. The dWgn, permitting and construction modifying the Existing Interconnect will be undertaken by BSU at no cost to the CCWSD and all be co pll% by March 31, 2008. b. e desig permitting and construction of the New Interconnect will be en by CCWSD at no cost to BSU and shall be completed by September 30, 2009. c. The interconnects shall be designed to include provisions for locking features so that each party shall have sole access to the locking device for its valve operator which, when opened, provides water to or receives water from the other party. Water provided by a supplying utility under this Agreement shall be only that quantity of water needed to provide temporary assistance in the event the receiving party has a period of reduced availability in its system, subject to concurrent excess supply of potable water in the sending utility's 3 Packet Pg. 642 9.A.3.c Agenda Item No. 16C3 October 23, 2007 Page 6 of 11 system as determined by such utility. Such supply of potable water shall be subject to the following: a. The Parties hereto shall each designate (and from time -to -time re- designate as needed to comply with this Agreement) an authorized member of its staff, to be responsible for sending and receiving written requests for water, and who shall have the authority to approve or disapprove requests for supply of water tom the other party. Each party shall keep the other advised of the then current phone number and e-mail address of the designated individual. b. Upon each written request for temporary potable water service under this Agreement, the request shall be actedALpon in good faith and in a timely manner by both Parti By ente into this Agreement Parties agree to supply sai vice feet to av ilability as described above. The supplying utilit I not be obligated to supply any C. specific volume of wat he rAving utility may terminate receipt of water supply with not less than twenty four (24) hours notice by sending the notice Jo the supplying utility when the need for temporary potable(water service by the receiving utility has been met. At its discretion, the supplying utility may establish, and enforce by Onilaternt'*f valves under its control, limits as to: times of day and/o f the week during which delivery of potable water will or made; the rates of flow at which delivery will be made; total volume of water to be delivered over one or more designated time periods. d. In each instance, the receiving party shall exercise prompt and diligent efforts to eliminate its need to be supplied temporary potable water from the sending party. 6. Payment for water supplied under this Agreement shall be on a per thousand (1000) gallon basis, as measured by the appropriate meter at the interconnect in use. The meter shall be read jointly by the Parties at the following times: when the valves are first opened at the beginning of delivery in response to a request for water; at the time of the final :1 Packet Pg. 643 9.A.3.c Agenda Item No. 16 October 23, 2007 Page 7 of 11 termination of all deliveries of water in response to that request for potable water from the sending party; and if necessary, at approximately the first of each calendar month that occurs between the beginning and termination of the response to that request. It shall be the responsibility of the sending party to schedule all readings of the meter at mutually agreeable times. 7. Labor and material costs incurred for opening or closing the valves or reading the meters as a result of a request for temporary potable water supply, shall not be charged by either party to the other party 8. It shall be the responsibility of the sending utility to make annual checks of the accuracy of the interconnect meters d to supply the receiving utility. If either receiving party believe ilI for water received may be based on readings from an inar *ate met n request the other party shall perform an additional check of the mete �s accuracy, with the requesting party physically present if desired by the requesting party. 1 Should that additional check reveal accuracy within the limits of the ` manufacturer's recommended accuracy, then the cost of obtaining the check shall be borne entirely by the requesting party. If either an annual check or ait additional check of accuracy reveals an error beyond the limit of the manufacturer's recommended accuracy, it shall be assumed that the i uracy in for the later one-half of the period of time fr he last ck that indicated acceptable accuracy. Any billings that occu %g that period shall be adjusted to reflect the quantity of over read or under read exceeding the appropriate limit of accuracy, at the rate per thousand (1000) gallons that was in effect at the time delivery occurred. 9. The rates for potable water charged by each party shall be fair and reasonable. Parties agree that the initial rates charged one to the other for water supply shall be the same. Such rates shall be reflected in each party's respective rate tariff, resolution or ordinance, as may be amended from time to time. The initial agreed rate to be three dollars twenty-five -- cents ($3.25) per 1000 gallons. I.n the event there occurs a period of time during which there is a differential in rates between the Parties, each party Packet Pg. 644 9.A.3.c Agenda Item No. 16C3 October 23, 2007 Page 8 of 11 shall be entitled to charge the other the higher rate then in effect. Each party shall give the other not less than thirty (30) days notice of any change in the rate to be charged hereunder. The potable water service rate will be expressed on a "per thousand gallons of metered potable water as delivered to the Point of Delivery" basis and will always be rounded to the nearest cent for billing and rate calculation purposes. 10. 'This Agreement shall remain in full force and effect for not less than ten (10) years following its date of execution and until thereafter terminated upon sixty (60) days written notice by either party to the other at its sole discretion; provided that, in the event C:CWSD elects to terminate this Agreement prior to constructing the Ne Int onnect, CCWSD agrees to reimburse BSU for out of pocket c incurre BSU in modifying the Existing Interconnect to provi ]ow ' either di ction as set forth in paragraph 3 above within the gui s of the Florida Statute referencing prompt payments. 11. if any condition or provision in this Agreement held to be invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity shall not affect any other condition eft provision and does not materially prejudice either party in its respective rights and obligations contained in the remaining valid conditions or provisions of this Agreement. 12. No waiver offeaquent breach of this Agreement shall be held to be a waiver of any other su breach irrespective of the length of time the fonner breach was waived. 13. Both Parties agree that it is a material part of the consideration for this Agreement to deliver only potable water meeting the requirements of all State, Federal, and local regulatory agencies having jurisdiction over potable water supply for public water systems. 14. Each party hereby saves and holds the other harmless from and against any claims, demands, damages or expenses resulting from delivery of water which does not meet the quality standards set forth herein; delivery of water at a pressure not exceeding 95 psi; operation of the facilities located on supplying utility's side of the Point of Delivery; and the storage, 0 Packet Pg. 645 9.A.3.c Agenda item No. 16 3 October 23, 2007 Page 9 of 11 transmission, distribution and use of potable water received through an interconnect. IS. Acts of God such as storms, hurricanes, earthquakes, land subsidence, strikes, lockouts or other industrial disturbances, acts of public enemy, terrorist acts, wars, blockades, riots, acts of armed forces, delays by carriers, inability to obtain materials or rights -of -way, acts of public authority, regulatory agencies, or courts, inability to construct the required infrastructure, or any other cause, whether the same kind is enumerated herein, not within the control of the Parties, and which by the exercise of due diligence, a party is unable to overcome, which prevents the perfor- mance of all or any specific part this Agreement, shall excuse performance of said part of this Aement u such force majeure is abated or overcome. 16. The 1997 Agreement is hereby replaced and superseded in its entirety and, as of the date of this Agent, of no further force or effect. 17. This Agreement shall take affect only upon approval by the Governing Board of CCWSD and BSU's franchisor, the City Council of the City of Bonita Springs, Florida. 'Row. IN WI SS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed or have caused this Agreement, wi Exhibits attached, to be duly executed. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND AS EX-OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER - SEWER DISTRICT M Deputy Clerk James Coletta, Chainnan Approved at to form and legal sufficiency: 7 Packet Pg. 646 Assistant County Attorney 9.A.3.c Agenda Item No. 16C3 October 23, 2007 Page 10 of 11 BONITA SPRINGS UTILITIES, INC. David McKee, President LWJ Packet Pg. 647 Page 1 of 1 Agenda Item No, 16C3 October 23, 2007 Page 11 of 11 9.A.3.c COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Item Number: *1GG3 Item Summary: Recommendation to nppruve an Interlocal Agreement forreounstruction of ilia existing interconnect taetweea} the Callier Courtly Water -Sewer Di sirk.1 and Bunita Springs Utilities, Inc to pi .tvid,- for ioversta pulaide wales [lows at Bonita Springs Utilities expense, to provide I'm the design and ren lnlcl.i!n1 of a second interconnect. at a location to be determined, at the expense of the Coilier f;nLEnty Water-Sevver (Ashict, and to establish rites for usage of pntatae water.1130P,000) Meeting Date: Ifi123/20ij7 9.00.00 AM Approved By iyanr!.la Libby tA!a!tcr U;reratio:ts MMINNfrr [rate Public t.Jtilities Water 1019120(17 1:25 PM Approved By VVlllisim 1? fAu9jill Pr P fn! t •:FI 0"+! r:t tvlill-M er slate 11l0-.Jie !!'I ll if ltT.: F:wmin..,!r ms 12007 9:001 AM Approved By ihonlas tl"Was :i�.`I�E'.^:t{vrt°, f.li!t5rlilr </ tt.itft PF.lMltc iltiil(ier: PIO)k ' Iiiiitir.-• Or—ra!i.-'a's 1(111612007 11:01 AM Approved By Dianna Ponryntan Contract Specialist Date Adininiab•at.ive Services Purchasing .1011612007 11!24 AM Approved By Jennifer A. Belpedio Assistant Comity Attorney-� Date County Attorney County Avnrney Office 1011612007 11 30 AM Approved By Steve Carnell PnrchasinglGeneral Svcs Director Date Administrative Services Purchasing ID11612007 1:21 PM Approved By James W. Del.ony Public Utilities Administrator Date Public Utilities Public Utilities Administration 10116/2007 1:22 PM Approved By OMS Coordinator Applications Analyst Date Administrative Services Information Technology 1011612007 113 PM Approved By Susan Usher Senior ManagementlEiudget Analyst Date County Manager's Office Office of Management & Budget 1011612007 5:26 PM Approved By James V. Mudd County Manager Date Board of County County Manager's Office 1011612007 ti:26 PM Commissioners O r.+ O CL a LL fn L O C 7 O U L O <.i r.+ C N E t c� r r Q Packet Pg. 648 9.A.3.c AGREEMENT FOR EMERGENCY WATER INTERCONNECTS This AGREEMENT is made and entered into on this day of 1997, by and between the Bonita Springs Utilities, a Florida corpor 'on ("Bonita Springs Utilities"), and the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, as the Governing Body of Collier County, Florida, and as Ex-Officio the Governing Board of the Collier County Water -Sewer District ("Board"). WHEREAS, Bonita Springs Utilities desires to provide for temporary emergency water service during periods of reduced availability from their normal sources caused by mechanical failure and/or natural disaster; and WHEREAS, Bonita Springs Utilities has requested County to provide such temporary emergency water service through temporary or permanent services connections; and WHEREAS, Board owns, operates and provides the public with existing utilities services via Board utility facilities which, pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth herein, have the potential to fiunish Bonita Springs Utilities limited emergency potable water supplies; and WHEREAS, Board and Bonita Springs Utilities agree to enter into this Agreement and thereby set forth the terms and conditions upon which temporary emergency water service shall be provided by Board to Bonita Springs Utilities; and WHEREAS, it is in the public's best interests that Bonita Springs Utilities and Board enter into this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board and Bonita Springs Utilities, in consideration of the mutual benefits flowing from each to the other, do hereby agree as follows: 1. Subject to the terms of this Agreement, Board agrees to supply to Bonita Springs Utilities such excess potable water as is available within the Board owned and operated water system that is over and above the needs and demands of the Board and of the Board's Utility customers within Board's water service area. 1 Packet Pg. 649 9.A.3.c 2. As neither the Board, nor Bonita Springs Utilities, has performed a hydraulic analysis of the Board's water transmission system in the vicinity of Bonita Springs Utilities system, Board makes no guarantee, either direct or implied, that excess capacity will be available at any time(s) requested by Bonita Springs Utilities. Bonita Springs Utilities fully understands and acknowledges that the Board will make no future improvements to the Board's system in order to meet Bonita Springs Utilities current or future needs as desired by the Agreement, and that current excess capacity, if any, may be obligated to future Board customers. 3. Service provided under this Agreement shall maintain the best available pressure at the discharge side of Bonita Springs Utilities Meter and Backflow Assembly, as to limit adverse effects to Board and Board's utility customers. 4. Water supplied to Bonita Springs Utilities pursuant to this Agreement shall be delivered to Bonita Springs Utilities through permanent or temporary interconnecting facilities at those points, in close proximity of the parties' facilities and at locations to be mutually agreed upon in writing. The nature of an emergency and of Board's utility service availability shall dictate the number and locations of the interconnects activated. Bonita Springs Utilities shall identify in writing to Board the desired interconnects to be activated. 5. Said interconnecting facilities, hereinafter, referred to as "The Interconnect," shall be constructed pursuant to Board's Utilities Standards and Procedures Ordinance, as may be amended, repealed and/or superseded, unless and/or as otherwise outlined by the Agreement. a. All costs for design and construction of The Interconnect(s) shall be the responsibility of Bonita Springs Utilities. Board shall have no financial and/or administrative responsibilities. b. The Interconnect shall be, at a minimum, designed to include provisions for locking features on Board's isolation valve. Board shall have sole access to its valve operator. C. Following completion of construction, Bonita Springs Utilities shall dedicate to the Board that portion of The Interconnect from the Board's 2 Packet Pg. 650 9.A.3.c water main up to and including the first isolation valve which controls the flow of water form the Board's water system. The remainder of The Interconnect shall be owned and maintained by Bonita Springs Utilities. 6. The parties agree that this Agreement shall not obligate the Board to provide service to Bonita Springs Utilities other than to provide water for a temporary emergency assistance as a result of mechanical failure and/or natural disaster. In the event service requests are made for reasons other than the conditions outlined within this Agreement, Board shall have the right to charge Bonita Springs Utilities the same rates charged other Board customers. The following additional conditions shall apply: a. The Board and Bonita Springs Utilities shall designate a member of their permanent staff who shall receive all requests and who shall have the authority to approve or disapprove requests. b. Each request for emergency water service shall be acted upon in good faith and in a timely manner by the Board. By entering into this Agreement, the Board agrees to supply said service subject to availability as described above; however, Bonita Springs Utilities is not obligated to accept any specific volumes of water, and termination of service shall occur when the need for temporary emergency water service is no longer necessary. C. At its discretion, the Board may establish and enforce control of valve(s) under its control, as to limit: 1) the times of day and/or of days of the week during which delivery will or will not be made; and/or 2) the total volume of water to be delivered over a designated period. These controls, however, will only be used as a means of addressing availability constraints. The Board shall not be responsible for any adverse effects that its inability to provide service, adjustments of valve settings, and/or pressure might produce in the Bonita Springs Utilities water system and/or its customer's property. Bonita Springs Utilities agrees to hold harmless, indemnify and defend the Board against all such claims. 3 Packet Pg. 651 9.A.3.c d. Bonita Springs Utilities agrees to exercise prompt and diligent efforts to eliminate its need to obtain temporary emergency service from the Board. 7. It is mutually agreed that whenever water is supplied by the Board under the terms of this Agreement, Bonita Springs Utilities shall reimburse the Board for all water received, in accordance with the following: a. Payment shall be on a per thousand gallon basis, measured by the appropriate meter(s) at The Interconnect(s) and based on the Board's actual production and delivery costs. This rate will be reviewed by the Board at least annually and adjustments made as necessary. b. The meter shall be read jointly by the two parties at the following times: when the valve(s) are first opened at the beginning of the service delivery; at the time of the final termination of service and at approximately the first of each calendar month that occurs between the beginning and termination of service. It shall be the responsibility of the Board to schedule all meter readings at mutually agreeable times. 8. It shall be the responsibility of the Bonita Springs Utilities to make annual accuracy and operation tests of The Interconnect(s) meter(s) and backflow assembly(ies). The results shall be forwarded in writing to the Board. If non- permanent interconnect(s) are utilized in part or for all interconnect(s) the meter(s) and backflow assembly(ies) shall be tested by the Board at the time of installation. Said test results shall be forwarded to the Bonita Springs Utilities. a. If Bonita Springs Utilities or the Board should believe that the metering device(s) is (are) not recording correctly or that the backflow assembly(ies) is (are) not operating correctly, either party may request a re -test of the meter(s) and/or backflow assembly(ies). Should the test(s) reveal accuracy or operation within the manufacturer's recommended range, then the cost of obtaining the test shall be borne entirely by the Utility making the request. If either an annual test(s) or an additional test(s) of accuracy or operation reveals an error beyond the limit of the manufacturer's recommended range, it shall be assumed that in the case of 4 Packet Pg. 652 9.A.3.c the meter that the inaccuracy existed for the last one-half (%Z) of time since the last test(s). Any billing that occurred during that period shall be adjusted by the Board to reflect the adjusted quantities based on the manufacturer's minimum if the test results are low and maximum if the test results are high accuracy levels and at the rate per thousand gallons that was in effect at the time delivery occurred. In the case of the backflow assembly(ies), Bonita Springs Utilities shall correct the problem in a timely manner. 9. This Agreement shall remain in full force and effect until terminated upon sixty c (60) days written notice by either party to the other at its sole discretion. a� 0 10. It is understood and agreed by and between the two parties that if any condition orCD r o provision contained in this Agreement are held to be invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity shall not affect any other condition or 0 c provision and does not materially prejudice either parry in its respective rights and a obligations contained in the remaining valid conditions or provisions of this Go �� ® CDAgreement. 11. No waiver of any breach of this Agreement shall be held to be a waiver of any other subsequent breach. cc �- a IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed N on the date and year first above written. VV ATTEST: .D)�Jq%E: BROCK, CLERK �p a 5 BOARD OF COUNTY;COI\�1iIS.SZ( S. COLLIER COUNTY; Ft FADA__. GOVERNING BODY OF 3 COUNTY AND AS.X.-C?IaICTO'�'HE ». . GOVERNING BOARD OT .,:.COL;LIER n COUNTY WATER-SEWER])I-])I-:. "- -` fJJ••J'f.,1111 iSSi11:`•`\ Q T OTHY . HANCOCK, CHAIRMAN Packet Pg. 653 9.A.3.c Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Assistant County Attorney ATTEST: SECRETARY, BONITA SPRINGS UTILITIES Lj A- ' - Frank Liles, Secretary h:lagreements971bonitaspringsemergagr-sjm BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF BONITA SPRINGS UTILITIES By: Henry Ho stetler,CHAIRMAN C i Packet P4 9.A.3.c Appendix D - Interlocal Agreement between CCWSD and the Big Cypress Stewardship District (Town of Big Cypress) TVi Packet Pg. 655 INSTR 6426309 OR 6266 PG 2221 L RECORDED 7/10/2023 10.27 AM PAGES 11 CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT AND COMPTROLLER COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA REC $95 00 INDX $2.00 AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE POTABLE WATER, WASTEWATER AND IRRIGATION QUALITY WATER ITTiLr'i y SERVICES TO THE TOWN OF BIG CYPRESS THIS INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made and entered into this Z7day of X^e .2023 by and between the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County. Florida. acting ex-officio as the Governing Board of the Collier County Water -Sewer District (hereinafter referred to as the CCWSD). the Board of Supervisors of the Big Cypress Stewardship District (hereinafter referred to as the "District"), CDC Land Investments, LLC and Collier Land Holdings. 1.1d. (hereinafter referred to as "Landowners'") (collectively the "Parties"). RECITALS: WHEREAS, Section 163.01(4)" Florida Statutes, the Florida, hiterlocal Cooperation Act of 1969 (the "Act"), authorizes the joint exercise of any power. privilegq,, r authority that the public agencies involved herein alight exercise separately; and WHEREAS, the CCWSD and the District are public agencies ` khin the meaning of the Act and desire to t ngage in the joint exercise of power that each might exercise separately: and WHEREAS, the CCWSD provides ►eater. ►waste►►ater and irrigation water service (collectively kno►vn as "utility services"), in an economical and environmentally beneficial manner to much of the unincorporated area of Collier County; and WHEREAS, the District also has statutor} authority to provide utility services within the Distrim but intends to authorise the CC\VSD to pro\ ide utility services within cetlain designated areas of the District; and WHEREAS, the CC VSD's service boundaries encompass the District: and WHEREAS. the CCWSD shall incorpoiate certain designated lands and property within the District into CCV1'SD's service area to exclusively provide retail potable water, wastewater and irrigation water (including effluent irrigation water, when available) utility services in the same manner and pursuant to the same ordinances and policies as CC %'SD current[\ provides service to all other customers located throughout the unincorporated sere ice area of Collier County.. Florida; and WHEREAS, the District acknowledges the CCWSD's right to offer utility services within the District and further authorizes the CCWSD to exclusively provide utility services inside a portion of the District's jurisdictional area known as the Town of Big Cypress; and WHEREAS, the Parties previously entered into an Agreement to Provide Potable Water and Wastewater Utility Services dated June S. 2021 and recorded nit June 15, 2021 at OR 5964. Pages 1662- 1670. which Agreement is being replaced in its entirety with this Agreement. and WHEREAS, this Agreement is intended to reduce to ►yriting the terms and conditions between the CCWSD, the District and the landowners as to the exclusive provision of utility services by the CCWSD within the Town of Big Cypress area of the District. NOW, THEREFORE, the CCWSD, the District and the Landowners agree as follows: i. The foregoing recitals are truc and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference. Packet Pg. 656 1-lie Landowners and/or subsequent developers shall construct and pay for potable and irrigation duality water mains and gravity sewers, force mains, wastewater pump stations and a community: pump station (collectively knmmn as "public utility facilities") within the Torun of Big Cypress development and convey such facilities to the CCWSD in the manner provided in the applicable CCWSD policies and County ordinances, including but not lirnited to Ordinance No. 2004-31. as amended, otherwise known as the Collier County Utilities Standards and Procedures Ordinance (the "Utilities Standards Ordinance"), all of which as may be amended by the Board Of Comity Commissioners from time to tine. Upon final acceptance of facilities, CCWSD shall be responsible for maintenance and operations of such accepted facilities. District improvements: A. The District shall upsi-r_e and construct potable water transmission mains, wastewater force mains and irrigation water transmission facilities from the Riverg,rass Point of Connection (POC) to the Town of Big Cypress North POC within the future Rig Cypress Parkway ROW and the Oil Well (toad itOW which shall be available to serve tine Town of Big Cypress' demand in accordance with its development schedule as defined in Exhibit A. The Town of Big Cypress North POC shall be as defined on Exhibit B. The CCWSD shall reimburse the District for the cost of upsiring the potable water transmission mains, wastewater force mains, and irrigation »'ater transmission facilities in an amount not to exceed $2.702,186 identified by Exhibit C.I. The CCWSD reimbursement to the District shall be made within 60 days after final acceptance of the infrastructure. B. The District will construct an IQ Main from the Oil Well Road/Big Cypress Parkway intersection to the Town of Big Cypress South POC using, the future Big Cypress right of wav to an intersection with 18`i' Avcnue NElspine road, east on the spine road and south in tine 80' right of w'ay to the TOBC South POC. This IQ main will supply the future utility site in order to serve all development south of the utility site. I lie Town Of Big Cypress South POC shall be as defined on Exhibit. B. The CCWSD shall reimburse (lie District for the cost of the IQ niain extension as detailed in Exhibit C.2 in an amount not to exceed $3,239,900. The CCWSD reiniburscinciit to (lie District shall be made within 60 days after final acceptance ofthe infrastructure. C . The District shall upsize and construct water and wastewater mains on a portion of the spine read and ►within the 80' right of way from the intersection of Big Cypress Parkway to the unility site as defined on Exhibit B. These mains Will Supply the utility site which in turn will serve all development south of the utility site. The CCWSD shall reimburse to the District for the cost of upsizing potable water and wastewater mains as detailed in Exhibit C.3 in an arnount not to exceed $804,400. 'Tile CCWSD reimbursement to the District shall be rnade within 60 days after final acceptance of the infrastructure. Per the Rivergrass Interlocal Agreement, the CCWSD agreed to provide the necessary potable/fire water design flows at a minimum pressure of 60 psi in the potable water systein at the Rivergrass Point of Connection. The Landowners and/or subsequent developers, through their design(s), will size their system(s) as required. The CCWSD agrees to provide a wastewater system head value of 60 psi for the projected wastewater flows at the Rivergrass Point of Connection by June 30, 2022 6. The CCWSD agrees to provide the necessary, irrigation water design flows at a minimum pressure of 60 psi in the IQ water systcni at the Rivergrass Point of Connection by June 30. 2022. The Landowners agree that locations for a total or five (5) well sites shall be made available for use PAtp Packet Pg. 657 9.A.3.c at no cast to CCWSD as shown in Exhibit D. The Landowners shall convey a County Utility easement for the wweII sites, wvltich shall be a irtinimuin of 30-foot by 50-foot easement area, shall abut a Right-of-way (ROW) with dedications for use to CCWSD. and shall be adjacent to the ROW that includes an inrigation quality water transmission main. The Landowners will provide the Office of the County Attorney w itlt an executed County UIiIity Casement, suitable for recording,. Upon receipt, the County shall assume all costs associated with the recordation of the easement. The Landowners will cooperate in the transfer of the South Florida Water Management District Consumptive Use Permit (CUP) for the Five (5) well sites. Should the transfer of a Consumptive Use Permit not be approved, the District will support the acquisition ofsuch permit by the CCWSD. 8. The District shall construct potable water trains and wastewater force mains designed to Collier County standards ►6ithin the future Big Cypress Parkway and Town of Big Cypress of sufficient size tip to and including, 16" needed by the CCWSD to supply its future utility site which is needed to serve Town of Big Cypress South and Bellmar Village. The wastewater force train, potable water rain, and irrigation quality main will connect to the utility site front the mains in the 80" Town right of way. The utility site will be the point ofconnection (POC) for potable water. wastewater and IQ for all development in tite Town of Big Cypress South. 9. The Landowners ►►ill require all developers in the Town of Big Cypress to install an internal IQ system to serve residential areas and the Town in accordance with the Collier County Land Development Code to their respective Points of Connection. i0. The CCWSD will install IQ meters and manage and bill residents based on their IQ water consumption at the CCWSD Board approved IQ rates for the IQ service provided regardless ofthe CCWSD's water sources). The Landowner shall pay for tlae cost of the IQ meter installations by the CCWSD. IL The Landowners shall convey a minimum 5-acre utility site located as shown on the Town of Big Cypress'SRA Masterplan ((Aility Site") suitable f'orthe construction and operation of the facilities necessary to provide sufficient utility services. CCWSD will provide a minittuttn 30 days' notice of intent to purchase the property. Upon payment by CCWSD, the Landowners shall convey to the CCWSD the Utility Site in fee simple, free arid clear ofall liens and encumbrances, by warranty (Iced. The Landowners will be responsible for paying any and all costs of any title work and searches arid shall be responsible for all costs for promptly rernow ing or curing any liens. encumbrances or deficiencies revealed in aity title work. The Landowners will promptly provide the Office of the County !Attorney with an executed deed, suitable for recording. Upon receipt, the County shall assume all costs associated with the recordation of the deed. The value of the Utility Site shall be determined by two accredited Real'Lstate Appraisers, each party will secure their own accredited Real Estate Appraiser. The purchase price shall be based on the market value of the land before any 5RA action is taken oil the Town of Big Cypress, before any application for increases in density, and before any other up -zoning applications to the Town of Big Cypress. The Final price per acre shall be equal to the average of the two independent appraisal reports. Section I I of the Rivergrass Agreement, DR 5746. Pages 3307-3314. shall be deleted in its entirety. 12. The Landowners agree to pre -pay water and wastcwater impact fees to the CCWSD without expiration (the''prepayment-). Landowners shall reserve water capacity equivalent to 350 FRCS and wastewater capacity equivalent to 350 CRCs. 13. Prepayment of water and wastewater impact fees shall be due no later than thirty (30) days after Landowners' receipt aitd acceptance of'. 3 (An) Packet Pg. 658 A. Alt approved and non -appealable SRA for the Town of Big Cypress development. 13, All required and non -appealable permits frorn the South Florida Water Manageniew District or any federal or state regulatory authorities for the first please of development. C. The prcpayment shall be at the then current CCW SD Board approved rates for water and wastewater impact fees: The credit for water and wastewater impact fees identified herein shall be reduced by 50% of the prepayment per I:RC for each residential omit oil a building permit issued thereon until the development is either completed or the credits are exhausted or have been assigned as provided for in the Collier County impact Fee Ordinance. "flee developer shall be responsible for any difference between the prepayment amount per ERC and tite rate in effect at the time of building pcnnit application submittal. 14. 'f'his Agreement shall remain in effect until tenninated by the CCWSD. the District or the Landowners. Any party may terminate this Agreement..\ ith or without cause, by providing written notice to the other parties prior to the date that either the CC W91). the District or the Landowners commit any affirmative act to construct or provide potable water. wastewater or irrigation water utility service within the District including. but not limited to. entering, into an agreement hiring a contractor or a consultant to provide utility constration-related .ervices in furtherance of this Agreement. Any attempt to tentt1nalc lire Agret'rtt`Brlt once any party has incurred anyexpense in furtherance of fulfilling, its duties under the Agreement. %%ithout the express \}ritten consent of the other parties, shall be considered a nullity. Termination shall be effective one hundred eighty (180) days after receipt of said written notice. This Agreement may be amended from time to tune upon the mritten consent of all parties. Any amendment to the Agreement must be in writing and must be executed ►vith the same fiormalitics as this; originat .\greement. 15, The Agreement to Provide Potable Water and Wastewater Utility Services dated .tune 8. 2021. and recorded ore June 15. 20 at 0R5964. Pry1es 1662-1670. is hereby repealed and replaced in its entirety with this Ag it. 16. NdTfCES. All nitatices rcgttrrcd under this Agreement shall be directed to the following offices. For the Courity: Office Of the County° Manager, 3335 East Tantianti "frail, Suite 101. Naples, Florida 34112. For the District Landowners: Patrick Utter, Collier Enterprises, Vice President of Deal Estate and Club Operations. 999 Vanderbilt Beach Road. Suite 507. Naples, Florida 34108. 17. IN©EMNiF1CA T7U:�. To the extent allo«cd by la%%, each party agrees to indentnifi. defend and hold harmless the other. its officers. board members, council members. agents and employees front and against any and all fines. suits. claims, demands, penalties, liabilities. costs or expenses, losses. settlements, judgments and awards and actions of whatever kind or nature, including attorney''s fees and costs (and costs and fees on appeal) and damages (including, but not limited to, actual and consequential damages) arising from any negligent. -villful or wrongful misconduct, knowing misrepresentation or material breach of this Agreement by such party. its officers, board members. council members, agents or employees. The Foregoing indemnification shall not canstitute a waiver of the CCWSD or the District's sovereign immunity beyond the limits sct forth in Florida Statutes, Section 768.28. nor shall the saute be construed to constitute agreement by any party to indemnify another party for such other party's negligent. v- il[fill or intentional acts or omissions. 18. COUNTERPARTS. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts. each of \%hick shall be deemed to be an original as against any party ►hose signature appears thereon art(] all of which shall together constitute one and the santc instrument. 19. RE CORD AND BINDING ON SUCCESSORS. This Agreement shall binding on any party's 4 clofoL_j Packet Pg, -65 9.A.3.c successors, assigns, or other subsequent parties in interest and shall be recorded in (lie Public Records of Collier County. The County shall he responsible for recording the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands and seals the day and year first written above. ATTESTS' BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Crystal l< . Kinrel, Clcrk ,�ftzourts COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By f3} Attest as to srr ar+' ?rr r C r Rick LoCastrv, ChairmansiratUrc Approv s to form and leg y.. sr'-' nt ounty Attorney � ATTEST: Printed Name: ATTEST: Printed Narne: ATTEST: Printed Name: Slid, &PRESS STEWARDSHIP . President CDC LAND INVESTMENTS, LLC By: Christian Spilker, President & CEO COLLIER LAND HOLDINGS, LTD. By: TARPON BLUE CE MANAGEMENT, LLC, Its Sole General Partner Christian Spilker, President & CRO I CAO Packet Pg. 660 9.A.3.c Ei hiBl! A arf.sa.f 1.fN... t�,TS wf 1ml M. =I 1QSa M) 1A SPYa xmf mo —I1111 "a f-m Son > lm i0a Sw Si.i4 I am no xmP Soy xaf7 S4S0 IyYIH!lalaidl.TiS+e1c If.in•tla. s 14 )...k Y im — w l+S Yff anwSN 14 H f1 N iQ IiWI k 1 If i1 11 1S s.Nnr c.+w+ Pl.ff 14C I= AS - s6 µl tw w IY w 11 x1 f1 4% U 31 as SS at 4LQQQ lLaP sAOSx6m BAw 111 foa 1. su M 1: ax x5 If — _ - - — - 1P 'A'. P P !k/ 11, Ix) Sy711 is" It— {,Mi "" I'll 1?n f.H f,ya Alfa S}SS f?K 'lQQP AM SkN) 1f.1ax mm tali SiPP a0.@pp aLL4w S4 WQY1 y_Pe: 1 fjl P -- llrix nl in fowP xfmQ S1P Q 4ssr� Iwm f+yY fiMl IG iP 1 yJSnnlYlsr� p P HMnary IMa/+i Cal« plryla yalaeY nFlu SbaffYK [w« �.a,IPgf fr.rx� ln1 4`_- StR -- W LC >D N 0 Q P B 6] 1 f.lfi veal 3,a11 x,51Q 1P1 li,S 4,,1 a.us 5.115 4i)1 6x11 ! ))1 faaQ S,SSS x,�,f W.fxl Sqv 1gfa xw iPPm 256= iQ.P111 2LNQ a,SgQ 71Q P !PQ Q m— law 1f,Pn LfpiP ."w Ism life )&m f.W f34 f.W f]a1 MS is M f}af I" ffaf i.f15 I.MSI fAm 11,173 11A1f x%Am mu lula aun i )AN lw S KY09 fQ.'� aR1AQ 1PF.nQ ft]px1 1,SQ0 I.W SSo.NQQ _a P P cuff af,1U a lw 1W P p P P a 111 xaflS 10.fn 1PIQ •l.1 /f 1,YA 7LP iPlq Q p IOiA% IQlpP1 Q C 14PPP IIA,afa 511QQ 1S4QLfQ 1L xM MP10 P 1QPlPm IP.Pm P f B mum 'MAW co co ti N d t4 Q d LL L O r 0 U L 6 U c E t R r Q Packet Pg. 661 9.A.3.c 471h Ave NE 451h Ave NE 43rd Ave NE N N a U ml 0;1 Well Road (+C.R.858) I 33rd Ave NE 31sl Ave NE ,P 29th Ave NE m 6 27th Ave NE d 0 Randall Blvd - co 24th Ave NE uz C.Y 22nd Ave NE rn m v lath Ave NE 1 Bth Ave NE 16th Ave NE � a 14th Ave NE a 0 0 121h Ave NE o Future Vanderbilt Exlension 101h Ave rJE 8lh Ave NE 6th Ave NE RIVERGRASS ROC Connection to Collier County Utility Mains Service Rivergrass Village Connection to Rivergrass Village 0 2000 4000 TOBC (NORTH) POC Town of Big Cypress (North) UTILITY LINE ASSOCIATED WITH TOSC (NORTH) SPINE ROAD FROM T+OBC (NORTH) POC TO TOBC (SOUTH) POC `—TOBC (SOUTH) POC Town of Big Cypress (South) BELLMAR POC 41h Ave NE --4 Bellmar Village 2nd Ave NE LEGEND Golden Gate ktivd E POC . � TOBC (NORTH) 2nd Ave. SE TOBC (50UTH) 4th Ave. Se — -- UTILITY MAINS ROUTE BthAve. SE UTILITY MAINS ROUTE ASSOCIATED WITH 8th Ave. SE TOBC (NORTH) Collier County Utility Agreement - TOB C Exhibit (B) "Y IT.IG.R. Packet Pg. 662 9/22/2020 AARBER & ORIGINAL RUNDAGE, COST TO SERVE LONGWATER THROUGH RIVERGRASS Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Pipe Upsizing and New Pipe Lander Connector Road RIVERGRASS changes when tONGWATER goes online Potable Water Wastewater Irrigation Length Length Length upsizing Pipe Cost upsieing Pipe Cost U siting Pipe Cast Valve Cost Valve Cost Valve Cost 5,C77 It 1,946 ft 6,959 ft a" to 12" ($74,124) 6"to 12" ($38,609) 4"to 6' (518,441) 58,400) (53,120? S3,000) 3,427 If 4,117 It 2,176 ft 8" to 16" (S126,285) 10" to 16" (5127,956) 4" to 16" (S97,354) 533,960) ($8,300) {$27,3201 8,273 It 6,319 ft 9,436 It 12" to 16" ($184,074) 12" to 16" (5140.598) 6" to 16" ($397,161) ($59,930) ($30,330) (597,950) 5,623 It 8"10 16" 1$207,208) ($50,940) 7,961 It 12" to '.F (S177,132) ($64,540) TOTAL COST Potable Water Wastewater Irrigation $486,773 $349,913 $1,141,047 Subtotal 1 $1,976,733 NEW PIPE ON CONNECTOR ROAD Potable Water Wastewater Irrigation Size Length Pipe Cost Valve Cost Sire Length Pipe Cost Valve Cost 6lr.e Length Pipe Cost Valve Cast 16" 3,316 ft ($221,907) ($29,320) 12" 4,850 It (5202,1001 1 1520,900) 16" 3,316 It ($221,907J ($29,3201 TOTALCOST Potable Water Wastewater Irrigation $251,227 $223,000 $251,227 Subtotal 1 $725,453 Grand Total $2,702,186 This Opinion of Probable Construction Cost (OPC) has been prepared by Agnol, Barber, & Brundage, Inc. JABS) at the request of owner or as a requirement of a governmental agency. ASS has based the unit costs of this OPC on previous work history with. similar projects or on values provided by reputable contractors we have worked with. In accordance with F.A.C. 61G•1518.011, this is not a guarantee or warranty expressed or implied as to the construction cost that may be obtained by owner using competitive bidding. If such a guarantee is needed, it is recommended that owner procure the services of a professional cost estimator or obtain a binding bid from a contractor. CCWSQ total reimbursement $2.702,186 r ant' Packet Pg. 663 9.A.3.c IM AGNOM ::..:BARBER & .;CEiRUNDAGE, Lvc \III Y IT I", 7"hr Tax n of Rf2 CT p rc n I rrNRanon I3PC Alarrh I027 ("anerpt: ll,e aorf of tr„falirn arY aunts far rhr addo—I main, Ihar x111 be regoirc l 1. The 7'axn and 6e.aar W hich ry , fnern Un foernrc Tian rf B1)i (',prifr Par Lup sf IM %Nclf Raad fe the untlly file. Dsfenp4on lint; Prue Quwwk Umi; Carl 12' PVC Icn AIM Man $150 1.600 LF _ i244.009 12'GM, Vd,e ELW 2 EA sI S.[M 16"PVC Irri Aian Man s2110 11. 7a0 LF _ 1=]4rq,p00 Ifi'(ialcvow $19,91I0 Ij EA si91.m Vemc,J Dt d Moan Ll.I OU 24 EA $10 i✓r) ARV 14,60 .10 FA i1f5 R+.)a i brief hJ,Fj9,4Ga Thtr Op— of pro babte Call IOFCI hat hem pcapuad br Apnoh, [lather dt 8cond.V. h. {APiRI A the rcquelt of 1tu pnO&was 0ORWr—rent of So"- nfntal md-'! AR ha hared the u ,i co I,,of th i, aPC an pra wi .GA huto, n,lh nmdaf prap:cn aI aa, dyer pcorided jr, reputable conrfrctrn xa na,e *wLgd %id, m aecae` "xith F.A C. dlC 1512.01 I. thn v not a Sn toe at n.m .ty .apt—d or anphed r to the r.onrImGnan coil Pax ma,' 4e obi..m t, o + "wwg corny rw- b,ddrns If s,ach a /UAa11ae Ir A614 , a I racaf —dCd 11104 o,.nrc procyn the ran tcn afo profsff,ornl cwt au, t" a obwr r b nA, ns I.a (ram a cMt(prfor CCINSD total reimbursement $3,239,900 Packet Pg. 664 9.A.3.c rrrau rr.. GNOU ::.r.. rrrra - 8C arrr■ER rrrrssa ...nw; RUNDAG€, Iir k#HIBITC.3 The Tn .£>4 Clpr.s Wily llpsr¢. C411 Cmp¢, il.. M Yrch 10!1 CrncrptPre.iorsl}, ld" Irentmir u... na,fa were la 1.. 110.1 Lr; C""I,. Parka.! to G.Idrn G,J, Bruks and by C'.Birr Cann. Sm ellrr local ern i.[r hum. ra.1.0 lets iu Ihr mire,., rp+d .f Tlu Taw. l5[[,i rr I f. ll..s. - Ih ...nt plans are 1.r Th Tewn Ind Br1laar t. be —,ed ♦.. Ir n,e.i, chat ,nll rrtrnd rWel Ik ;Y IY 'nlrnrr read of Tkr Tewn Ilrrn¢e k1 p7 aa-0 nW throe eY BCP T6r "ITi" c I pare.... brt[.ks d.a. the deffrrre re in raa, tar the pipe,..,Ih, of 1hr rldrtr u" idrrinp 1. Ihr wfrri.r i.,a d The Ton.. The m1m, ¢I.np BCT' .rs na1 ineladed in rh" —s rrtnprris.n f.�erwri. II V. SYnrk' [lore Lira Tn.0 [, Lora Cmi Pol sb le r4arrr 16'pVC R'AI S1a0 Ti4 i.F LIi6.OM Ih"Il SSY.'Apl I Edo IP,4tr, .rurM.rX larc sor L5'e nrn ar rl 1a-p�C F6d ::1u 1"a0C Lr i11R.OM 16' Val.r SI3 JNf } FJh f?n Vi.P i'I r�4r.r.l ptar„a,e`TORE Tofu C.. w M%.,=Gfa,l.,r ,,j"wl6r.nee0aac¢irl.ri .� 1MTwd i?d"ldtl rase, 11a T t rrrnn if _ 4 erk' ssnim Tpu[' enl Ceedt rPMlrprlwddrffr sYi,snuw we lH•. w. ph ied.0 m"Aj .MAk""risra..t.lA.nvwri rn•rd.i.twird.I Rrc rrw.f..16—im u1 Thn flp,nna nr Trohmk Cen 1DPC1 has be Pnywed bi A1+a1, Aubcr l BftaiW. Ire.(ASM w Qr kq-.1 of rk m.ner arm ¢ r:rpiirceiwar nf;man r=J ti;.c¢c. ASH ha t wd tFx unn coat e£16u DPC vn prea.alwytl, huton I r..flar pr' rx'asrd ar on ..trapn WW b7; FuL'bk ewe anm me luxe RorLed w ah u arw.d— ru'A F A C 616-0 6 011, due n awt a;uraer.r a . xurw.. e al5ar unp6ed ¢, 1a LkiMaGrislior cae slur _? max b. ablam..d Y+.-•.em ue.r6 NmpeWne bdd:q I£a,ch ¢;w¢es w' a i.sa6ed.. d„ recam,aW,d 6sa owdr 1,ra..re the,en, , r£. pioLsrw.al con erJ--or rr abuts , bd¢lwfd bed f,om ¢ wmrscur. CCINSD total reimbursement S804i400 Q d i� 00 00 O� ti v ram+ IZ M IL Co L 0 T y.r O U L U y.r d E t y.r y., Q Packet Pg. 665 9.A.3.c � ry P ` RIVERGRASS VILLAGE 1 � it j.. r 1 IQ WELL SITE 01 —OIL WELL ROAR (C X. —r.aa ssr n.a tbFf I++((,rrirl!Fa.w � � f RIVERGRASS VILLAGE II a IQ WELL SITE _- Kra 10t WELL SITE 03 -U_ -1- 1! I'l WELL SITE IQWELL SITE 91 YYE L 1 1Q WEL4 3J,TE!] I f 1 IQ WELL SITE $5 i f EXHIBIT 1) Rivergrass Village IQ Well Site Locations Map Q (e) - Packet Pg. 666 9.A.3.c Appendix E — Interlocal Agreement between CCWSD and the Big Cypress Stewardship District (Bellmar Village) AVi Packet Pg. 667 iNSTR 6426302 OR 6266 PG 2206 RECORDED 7/10/2023 10:19 AM PAGES 7 CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT AND COMPTROLLER COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA REC $61.00 AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE POTABLE WATER, WASTEWATER AND IRRIGATION QUALITY WATER UTILITY SERVICES TO BELLMAR VILLAGE THIS iNTERLOCAL AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made and entered into this 2.7 rA day of I,_„ , 2023 by and between the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting, ex-offrcio as the Governing Board of the Collier County Water -Sewer District (hereinafter referred to as the "CCWSD"), the Board of Supervisors of the Big Cypress Stewardship District (hereinafter referred to as the "District"), and Collier Land Holdings, Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Landownere') (collectively, the "Parties"). RECITALS: WHEREAS, Section 163.01(4), Florida Statutes, the Florida Interlocal Cooperation Act of 1969 (the "Act"). authorizes die joint exercise of any power, privilege or authority that the public agencies involved herein might exercise separately; and WHEREAS, the CCWSD and the District are public agencies within the meaning of the Act and desire to engage in the joint exercise of power that each might exercise separately, and WHEREAS, the CCWSD provides water, N•astewater, and irrigation quality water service (collectively known as `.utility services") in aneconomical and environmentally beneficial mannerto much of the unincorporated area of Collier County. and WHEREAS, the District also has statutory authority to provide utility services within the District but intends to authorize the CC SI7 to tovide utility services within certain designated areas of the District; and WHEREAS, the CCV+ISD"s service boundariers encompass the District, and WHEREAS, the CCWSD shall incorporate certain designated lands and property within the District into CCWSD's service area to exclusively provide retail potable water, wastewater and irrigation quality water utility services in the same manner and pursuant to the same ordinances and policies as CCWSD currently provides service to all other customers located throughout the unincorporated service area of Collier County, Florida. and WHEREAS, the District acknowledges the CCWSD's right to offer utility services within the District and further authorizes the CCWSD to exclusively provide utility services inside a portion of the District's jurisdictional area known as Bellmar Village; and WHEREAS, the Parties previously entered into an Agreement to Provide Potable Water and Wastewater Utility Services dated June 8. 2021 and recorded on June 15, 2021 at OR 5964. Page 1671„ which Agreement is being, replaced in its entirety with this Agreement; and WHEREAS, this Agreement is intended to reduce to writing the terms and conditions between the CCWSD, the District and the Landowner as to the exclusive provision of utility services by the CCWSD within the Bellmar Village area of the District. NOW, THEREFORE, the CCWSD, the District and the Landowner agree as follows: (GNC Packet Pg. 668 The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference. 2. The Landowner and/or subsequent developers shall construct and pay for potable and irrigation quality water mains and wastewater facilities within the Rellinar Village development including, but not limited to. gravity sewers, force mains, wastewater pump stations, wastewater community pump station, and irrigation quality water mains within the Bellmar development and convey such facilities to the CCWSD in the manner provided in the applicable CCWSD policies and County ordinances including, but not limited to, Ordinance No. 2004-31, as amended. otherwise known as the Collier County Utilities Standards and Procedures Ordinance (the "Utilities Standards Ordinance"), all of which as may be amended by the Beard of County Commissioners from time to time. Upon final acceptance of facilities, CCWSD shall be responsible for maintenance and operations of such accepted facilities. The District shall, as shown on Exhibit B. upsixe and construct the potable water and wastewater transmission main from the utility site to the Bellmar POC so that sufficient flows are available to service Bellmar Village. The District will also construct the irrigation transmission main from the utility site to the Bellmar POC to serve the Bellmar Villages demand. The improvements shall be completed in accordance with the development schedule defined in Exhibit A. 4. The CCWSD agrees to reimburse the District for the cost of upsizing the potable water and wastewater transmission main and for the cost of the irrigation transmission main from the utility site to the Bellmar POC. as identified in Exhibit C . The CCWSD shall reimburse the District in an amount not to exceed $6.109,350, which reimbursement shall be made within 60 days after final acceptance of the infrastructure. 5. The CCWSD agrees to provide the necessary potable/fire water design flows at a minimum pressure of 60 psi in the potable water system at the utility site. The developers, through their design(s), will size their systems) as required. 6. The CCWSD agrees to provide a wastewater system head value of 60 psi for the projected wastewater flows at the utility site. 7. The CCWSD agrees to provide the necessary irrigation quality water design Flows at a minimum pressure of 60 psi in the IQ water system at the utility site. 8. The Landowner will require all developers in Bellmar to install an internal IQ system to serve residential areas and the Village Center in accordance with the LDC to the Bellmar POC. 9. The CCWSD will install IQ meters and manage and bill residents based on their IQ water consumption at the CCWSD Board approved iQ rates for the IQ service provided regardless of the CCWSD's water source(s). The Landowner shall pay for the cost of the IQ meter installations by the CCWSD. 10. The Landowner within Bellmar Village agrees to pre -pay water and wastewater impact fees to the CCWSD without expiration (the "prepayment"). Landowner shall reserve water capacity equivalent to 650 ERCs and wastewater capacity equivalent to 350 ERCs. I I . The prepayment shall be due no later titan thirty (30) days after Landowner's receipt and acceptance of: a. An approved and non -appealable SRA forthe Bellmar Village development. 2 cco� Packet Pg. 669 b. All required and non -appealable permits from the South Florida 'Water Management District or any federal or state regulatory authorities for the first phase oi' development. c. The prepayment shall be at the then current CCWSD Board approved rates for water and wastewater impact fees: The credit for water and wastewater impact fees identified herein shall be reduced by 50% of the prepayment per F,RC for each residential unit on a building pen -nit issued thereon until the development is either completed or the credits are exhausted or have been assigned as provided for in the Collier County Impact Fee Ordinance. The developer shall be responsible for any difference between the prepayment amount per ERC and the rate in effect at the time of building permit application submittal. 12. This Agreement shall remain in effect until terminated by the CCWSD, the District or the Landowner. Any party may terminate this Agreement, with or without cause, by providing written notice to the other parties prior to the date that either [lie CCWSD, the District or the Landowner commit any affirmative act to construct or provide potable water, wastewater or irrigation quality water utility service within the District including, but not limited to, entering into an agreement hiring a contractor or a consultant to provide utility construction -related services in furtherance of this Agreement. Any attempt to terminate the Agreement once any party has incurred any expense in furtherance of fulfilling its duties under the Agreement, without the express written consent of` the other parties, shall be considered a nullity. Termination shall be effective one hundred eighty (180) days after receipt of said written notice. This Agreement may be amended from time to time upon the written consent of all parties. Any asnendntent to the Agreement must be in writing, and must be executed with the same formalities as this original Agreement. 13. The Agreement to Provide Potable Water and Wastewater Utility Services dated June 8, 2021 and recorded on June 15, 2021 at OR 5964, Pane 1671. is -hereby repealed and relaced in its entirety with this Agreement. 14, NOTICES. All notices required under this Agreement shall be directed to the following offices. For the County: Office of the County Manager, 3335 East Tamiami `frail. Suite 101. Naples, Florida 34112. For the District/Landowner: Patrick Miter, Collier Enterprises, Vice President of Real Estate and Club Operations, 999 Vanderbilt Beach Road, Suite 507, Naples, Florida 34108. 15. INDEMNIFICATION. To the extent allowed by law, each party agrees to indemnity, defend and hold harmless the other, its officers. board members, council members, agents and employees from and against any and all fines, suits, claims, demands, penalties, liabilities, costs or expenses, losses, settlements, judgments and awards and actions of whatever kind or nature, including attorney's fees and costs (and costs and fees on appeal) and damages (including, but not Iimited to, actual and consequential damages) arising from any negligent, willful or wrongful misconduct, knowing, misrepresentation or material breach of this Agreement by such party. its officers, board members, council members, agents or employees. The foregoing indemnification shall not constitute a waiver of the CCWSD or the District's sovereign immunity beyond the limits set forth in Florida Statutes, Section 768.28, nor shall the same be construed to constitute agreement by any party to indemnify another party for such other party's negligent, willful or intentional acts or omissions. 16. COUNTERPARTS. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original as against any party whose signature appears thereon and all of which shall together constitute one and the same instrument. 17. RECORDING, This Agreement shall be recorded in the Public Records of Collier County. The Packet Pg. 670 County shall be responsible For recording the saute. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands and seals the clay and year First written above. ATTEST-. Crystal Kinzei. Clerk Clerk Attest as to Chi r"rl's signature only Approved as to farm and Lego t . nt Assi t ounty Attorney ATTEST: Printed Name: ATTEST: Printed Name: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: / Rick LoCastro,Chairman BIG CYPR SS STEWARDSHIP I T 1 � [3v: Patrick . Utter, President COLLIER LAND HOLDINGS, LTD. By. TARPON BLUE CE MANAGEMENT, LLC, Its Sole General Partner By: Christian Spilker, President & CEO 4 � Packet Pg. 671 9.A.3.c BELLNIAR ABSORPTION SCHEDULE A Infmctrurtiirn Litigation/Permit Construction j By Year 2021 2022 2023 2024 2W5 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 7032 2033 2034 2035 2036 Total Rivergra5s Residential Commercial 110 200 200 250 250 250 50.000 250 250 6,000 6,000 2S0 18,000 250 200 40 2,500 801000 Longwater Residential Commercial 65 209 200 2S0 250 250 250 250 40,000 5,000 250 5,000 250 30,000 250 135 0 0 801000 Bellmar Residential Commercial 120 A 200 225 250 250 250 50,000 250 6,000 250 6,000 250 250 250 23,000 215 85,000 a Total 400 510 700 725 750 750 750 750 750 700 425 250 215 7,950 QO 4C O Infrastructure CD O Litigation/Permit Construction I - " _ _ Cumulative 2021 2022 2023 2024 202E 2026 ZM 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 Rlvergrass Residential 110 310 510 760 1,010 1,260 1,510 1,760 2,010 2,260 2,460 ZS00 Commercial Longwater Residential 65 265 465 715 965 1,215 1,465 1,715 1,965 2,225 2,465 Commercial Bellmar Residential Ito 310 535 785 1,035 L285 1,535 1,785 2,035 2,28S 2,535 Commercial Total Residential 175 575 1,085 1,795 2,510 3,260 4,010 4,760 5,510 6,260 6,960 7,385 7,635 7,8SO Commercial 0 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Bellmar Advance ERC's Water 650 650.0 595.0 495.0 382.5 2STS 1.32.5 , ERC's at50% (SS.ill (100.0) (1I2.51 J125.0) 1125.01 i132.5} Balance ERC's 595.0 495:0 382-5 257.5 132.5 0.0 Water $3,382 I= zm 2027 3F3H Advance ERC's Wastewater 350 350.0 295.0 195.0 82.5 ERC's at 50% (55.0) (I00.01 (112.51 (82.51 Balance ERC's 295.0 195.0 82.5 0.0 Wastewater $3,314 650 Water $2,198,300 350 Wastewater $1,159,900 Total Advance 53,358,200 Iq tV O tV J a 00 00 O tV d f+ Q FA Packet Pg. 672 47th Ave HE 45th Ave HE 43rd Ave NE mRlvergrass Village c� 0 2000 4000 Oil Well Road (C.R.858) LL + 33rd Ave HE . 31st Ave HE E 2M Ave HE m° a Town of Big Cypress (North) 27th Ave HE Randall Blvd. m 24th Ave HE n d. �- 0 22nd Ave HE rn e UTILITY LINE ASSOCIATED WITH 20tn Ave HE 3 LL TOBC (NORTH) 18th Ave NE E � 16th Ave HE UTILITY SITE 14th Ave HE 121h Ave HE I I Future Vanderbilt Extension loth Ave HE I Town of Big Cypress (South) 80' ROW athAve HE Utility Mars Serving Belkmar Village 6th Ave HE BELLMAR POC 4th Ave NE Bellmar Village i 2nd Ave HE Golden Gate Blvd E �! LEGEND POC zhd Ave. SE — — UTILITY MAINS ROUTE 4thAve. SE UTILITY MAINS ROUTE ASSOCIATED WITH 61h Ave. SE TOBC (NORTH) ath Ave. SE Collier County Utility Agreement - Bellmar Exhibit (B) Q 7206MEWAwS REV t2.1612 U/ Packet Pg. 673 r.rerr rbrrr GNOLi r i.m! ■rrrft "••" RBER U urrr Flo, RUNDAGE wc. rr M F.\SI I BIT C Dellru.r 1.hi1i41 Srnire Cwt C..mµrr M.t1h M. on Concrp7 Frevr... I,. Id" In.sm6ssun 1nli4r, rerr tv ru. 110n4 Ell Cdp ru. r.rkw.11. Gulden Cate R.wl d h, C.Ow C nf7- sealer hoJ w i,. huo rere iv a1s0 r.n in. the biterior road .r Tie To— (Stenana If f lownrr she -,"I p1.ns are for The T. and 0e11m.r to b, d ri. le• a rh.1 riW tend s.5el+ th,..Xh Ihe.n.nar road of The town (S—orio 1) .nd n.a ihw rl. R('P. The RrDmar feat rampodc.. hrr.1s down the d, frnrnre in twit fw lb pi wr a.wh of the .t 1sr 1it,, r.I.hj tv th. astrrwr r..d .f Tie TF1rn- The m.i.s ale.{ RCP r.0 i.rl.&A in Ihi. rwt comp. risen (St -Fie t1- Tbt cast ei.rriph— .rca.nre for the addit...I mina ihm rill br rrq.irrd t. srrre Schroer which runs fram thr.l iitr it, t• G.1dm Gar, 0.0rd. D.sc ,an and Frio u.nw .. OaM - _ _ Cea Osmiji R'PVC IS'M StOs AIM LF f713.MMU LF 4"GV $1.1m Ia EA $11.0W E.A - Pot.hfr SS'alrr 1' PVC K'At sea 2.230 LF $135,toxi LF i'GY sd.AGO 1 EA SIf, AA I d•PYCWM 3?GG LP UN- LF s1.120.MIn l a'GV 519,9r1G EA 11 EA S17a,RGG ,S.h-rwd N+ sm Sa1.rN.f sififs'"O tktt : 12r1 Price rune, U■u Ow t: k I "m 6' PVC FM SSS 350 LF U9,750 - LF 3S'asur.trL IR'PYC F.M S2Y0 LF 9.1w LF 5t,vI I}Iw Yal,v S11450 1 EA la EA I133.300 S.d.T&VI 7i7 1141-lydd Ss./3i.JOrP lFrIIII ln. Pn YtN lm1 pvc6a LP SIF5pfW EASal.c SO Wt E 12041dn^ i3-6JG 5u $2?2,4U6 .sr�-rw.r s2.vPr.sa • 13•PVC 4YM- -- LOU 4.41)G LF S319'm I.'GV 519,9W EA $39.00 SVasrewalrr 12 WC FM f s I-1XKI EA S2vl•30v 42-PIu VJ,. S6,30G P L( 1I1--4W s1.xp•I�166 Crew. a vane, (•( I.are.l.a p,.r,.,„ -eaii.la, 1.1ar n.d�r whren v.; x1d«d I—, ... Vq .'Cl, pmer vane,a run T.la1 es[ G 4reah. CCVVSD total reimbursement $6,109,350 1rri .h.a SI.W0.30" Rear ,or RrU .r T.t.l Crrdil 16,189,]-5 •IM1r pfn i..•hedh, M".e0--M•.,.w[saa.r.wrd,flirrr..+.. pyvMtli Frei«�..s.rw•ri.ltr.rrrrerrp%rrirSrar�sL pf..4"J .::.«rd+ro O) This Opinion of Probobk Cass (OM 1tz hco µr.paatd bn Agwk Barba d 13nmd4, Inc IARD) a the t.qu , of vw on ncr N as. requL of CO, c rnnoW'- Genre,. ARR F s Ira d dw unrl ewo at des OPC on P.,sous t,.,k 1,,tW,3 i } 3u T lac pmjt.,. -,allies Pra,sdcd b7pu bl eoMrxr,ar +. ho,Y srarked rah in aerordanct nidr F A C. h1G-I Sl1 t I I vnt u+ux a guarantee o narnnn tV.r d ar m yhld u w lIw e..rarunran nvr fl T mad b: obtairwJ b3 ..,n.T u,wg < peptic. brdd c lfsudT a S ann1+. n aocd.d- i[ u rceomnreud:d [Iran m+, r p rxure Ilx r<r ,1n of. proC.rsia,a3 colt csl6a.rur or aatna a brndml bud Tram a aaGrazl.r Packet Pg. 674 9.A.3.c Appendix F - Interlocal Agreement between CCWSD and the Big Cypress Stewardship District (Rivergrass Village) AVi Packet Pg. 675 INSTR 5850752 OR 5746 PG 3307 RECORDED 4/2/2020 9:48 AM PAGES 7 CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT AND COMPTROLLER, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA REC $61.00 9.A.3.c AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE PO►I'ABIEWATER,WASIEWATERANI HWGA'IIONWATMUIRMYSERVICES THIS INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made and entered into this Wk\ day of ,jnnw�_, 2019 by and between the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Flora acting ex-officio as the Governing Goard of the Collier County Water - Sewer District (hereinafter referred to as the "CCWSD'), the Board of Supervisors of the Big Cypress Stewardship District (hereinafter referred to as the "District"), CDC Land Investments, LLC and Collier Land Holdings, Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Landowners"). RECITALS: WHEREAS, Section 163.0 4I11a_St � ` `ns, the Florida lnterlocal Cooperation Act of 1969 (the "Act), authorizes 0e � iiercise of iaw r privilege or authority that the public agencies involved hereinmightexercise separately; and ; WHEREAS the CCWS10 an at District ice. ublic `� agencies within the meaning of the Act and desire to engage in the 3bi-tLereaCi�eac 'ttiight exercise separately; and P WHEREAS, the CC `,` g Vs SI rtvi er � ast�er and, irrigation water service (collectively known as "utiliity° �ical and envK iientally beneficial manner to much of the unincorporattit of C er County; end I ` WHEREAS, the District has statutory authdrity it r'nrride utility services within the District, but intends to suthori CCSD to provide uUlitsces within certain designated areas of the District; and WHEREAS, the CCWSD's sere es 5c Impass the District; and WHEREAS, the CCWSD shall incorporate certain designated lands and property within the District into CCWSD's service area to exclusively provide retail potable water, wastewater and irrigation water, excluding the golf course irrigation within the Village (including effluent irrigation water, when available) utility services in the same manner and pursuant to the same ordinances and policies as CCWSD currently provides service to all other customers located throughout the unincorporated service area of Collier County, Florida; and WHEREAS, the District acknowledges the CCWSD's right to offer utility services within the District and further authorizes the CCWSD to exclusively provide utility services inside a portion of the District's jurisdictional area known as Rivergrass Village; and WHEREAS, this Agreement is intended to reduce to writing the terms and conditions between the CCWSD, the District and the Landowners as to the exclusive provision of utility services by the CCWSD within the Rivergrass Village area of the District. NOW, THEREFORE, the CCWSD, the District and the Landowners agree as follows: 0 Packet Pg. 676 1 OR 5746 PG 3308 9.A.3.c 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference. 2. The Landowners shall require all developers in Rivergrass to construct and pay for potable and irrigation quality water mains and wastewater facilities within the Rivergrass Village development including but not limited to gravity sewers, force mains and pump stations and a community pump station and:convey such facilities to the CCWSD in the manner provided in the applicable CCWSD policies and County ordinances, including but not limited to Ordinance No. 2004-31, as amended, otherwise known as the Collier County Utilities Standards and Procedures Ordinance (the "Utilities Standards Ordinance'), all of which as may be amended by the Board of County Commissioners from time to time. 3. The CCWSD shall construct potable veer t �sion mains, wastewater force mains and irrigation water tnansmission. ilie�yutility site to the Point of Connection for Rivergrass Village wMD be available los =Rivergrass Village's demand in accordance with its development schedule as defined iri 4edble A. 4. The Point of Conneetion Bhalbe .-'thp llNp rlheasf comer o eyde Park SRA, as defined on Schedule B ,r 5. The CCWSD agrees to pro teA-e tabl w design flows at aminimum pressure of 60 psi irit1ae of s�r the design by September 30, 2020. ' 6. The CCWSD agrees to =tteastewater systertiralueof60psifortheprojected wastewater flows at the onnection by Srspef 30, 2020. 7. The CCWSD agrees to provide °th" *, igation water design flows at a minimum pressure of 60 psi in the IQW water system at the Point of Connection by September 30, 2020. The Landowner agrees to provide the IQ water distribution system basis of design for review and approval by the CCWSD. 9. The Landowners will require all developers in Rivergrass to install an internal residential IQ system to serve residential areas and the Village Center in accordance with the LDC to the Point of Connection. The golf course in Rivergrass will not be required to accept IQ water from the CCWSD and will utilize a separate Water Use Permit for its irrigation needs. 10. The CCWSD will install IQ meters and manage and bill residents based on their IQ water consumption at the CCWSD Board approved IQ rates for the IQ service provided regardless of the CCWSD's water source(s). 11. The Landowners will reserve a minimum 5-acre site for future CCWSD-related utility needs pending future development plans south of Rivergrass Village. If future development does not occur within 15 years of the date of this agreement, the utility site will revert back to -the Rivergrass Village development, unless the reservation is extended 2 .ono Packet Pg. 677 1 OR 5746 PG 3309 9.A.3.c by the Landowners. 12. The Landowners within Rivergrass Village agree to pre -pay water and wastewater impact fees to the CCWSD without expiration (the "prepaymenfl. Landowners shall reserve . water capacity equivalent to 250 ERC's and wastewater capacity equivalent to 250 ERC's in advance. 13, The prepayment shall be due no later than thirty (30) days after Landowners' receipt and acceptance of a. An approved and non -appealable SRA for the Rivergrass Village development. b. All required and non -appealable permits from the South Florida Water Management District or any federal or state regulatory authorities. c. The prepayment shall a i t1i��t CCWSD Board approved rates for water and wastewater # feees: Tltevredit for water and wastewater impact fees identified herein. sa,,.be reduced by 50% of the prepayment per ERC for each residential unit on awilding„permit issued thereon until the development is either completed or the cy6dita.W, exhausted or have been assigned as provided for in the Collier County Itzipact Fee ace. The develo er shall be responsible for any difference between the�jepa' I p'VAC and the rate in effect at the time of building permit applicatto _ J , � �� .a;gym., ., • � ,. ,�,�,� 14. This Agreement shall remain in effect until teCe inate4 by ounty, the District and the Landowners. All parties must agree in writm terhutis Agreement, prior to the date that either the CCWSD,,the District or the t any affirmative act to construct or provide potable water, wastewater or irrtghtib water utility service within the District, including but not limited,to eement hiring a contractor or a consultant to provide utility construYSerutces in furtherance of this Agreement. Any attempt to terminate the Agreement once any party has incurred any expense in furtherance of fulfilling its duties under the Agreement, without the express written consent of the other parties, shall be considered a nullity. Termination shall be effective one hundred eighty (180) days after receipt of said written notice. This Agreement may be amended from time to time upon the written consent of all parties. Any amendment to the Agreement must be in writing and must be executed with the same formalities as this original Agreement. 15. NOTICES. All notices required under this Agreement shall be directed to the following offices: For the County: Office of the County Manager, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida 34112. For the District/Landowners: Patrick Utter, Collier Enterprises, Vice President of Real Estate and Club Operations, 2550 North Goodlette Road, Suite 100, Naples, FL 34103. 16. INDEMNIFICATION. To the extent allowed by law, each party agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the other, its officers, board members, council members, agents and employees from and against any and all fines, suits, claims, demands, penalties, liabilities, costs or expenses, losses, settlements, judgments and awards and actions of whatever kind or nature, including attorney's fees and costs (and costs and fees on appeal) CAU Packet Pg. 678 OR 5746 PG 3310 9.A.3.c and damages (including, but not limited to, actual and consequential damages) arising from any negligent, willful or wrongful misconduct, knowing misrepresentation or material breach of this Agreement by such party, its officers, board members, council members, agents or employees. The foregoing indemnification shall not constitute a waiver of the CCWSD or the District's sovereign immunity beyond the limits set forth in Florida Statutes, Section 768.28, nor shall the same be construed to constitute agreement by any party to indemnify another party for such other party's negligent, willfull or intentional acts or omissions. 17. COUNTERPARTS. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original as against any party who signature appears thereon and all of which shall together constitute one and the same instrument. 18. Recording. This Agreement shalk d t M edU uklic Records of Collier County. The County shall beresponsibffthe same: ` ' \- IN WITNESS WHE EO , parties hereto haves e sands and seals the day and year first written above. 7 � ~' l ItD ,,60 Y COMMISSIONERS ACI'�Yyx� t COL` ROI!,FLORIDA C !f VTwo- P Cl, w* 5t0 Ch�By� Saunders siaaji a or s Chairman 4 Packet Pg. 679 1 OR 5746 PG 3311 ATTEST: OJ4? - - ATTEST: --- � f pk,�- ?, V- BIG CYPRESS STEWARDSHIP DISTRICT BY: �, Patrick L. -Ne"r, President CDC LAND lw ATTEST: BY: 5 kI Vice President Vice President I Packet Pg. 680 1 OR 5746 PG 3312 9.A.3.c Schedule A Rivergrass Absorption Schedule Product Type 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Total. Single Family 71 127 170 170 198 170 170 141 113 85 1,414 Multi -Family 54 98 130 130 152 130 130 109 87 65 1,086 Total 125 225 300 300 350 300 300 250 200 150 2.500 CAO Packet Pg. 681 *** OR 5746 PG 3313 *** 9.A.3.c h Q Packet Pg. 682 Best Avail 9.A.3.c Appendix G — Capital Improvement Schedules CCWSD IWSD Port of the Islands CID AMUC not provided by utility or publicly available 4k Packet Pg. 683 9.A.3.c Collier County Water -Sewer District IN PW J* Packet Pg. 684 9.A.3.c Line No. Project No. Responsible Project Name FY 2024 Proposed Budget AUIR FY 2024 FY 2025 2026 FY 2027 FV 2028 Summary FY 2024-2028 Existing 412 Water Projects 1 33842 FDEP Statewide Water Restoration 2 50105 Patrick T. Robin B. Integrated Asset Management Program $ 100,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 900,000 3 50154 Hurricane hma $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 4 50199 COVID-19 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 5 60224 Diana D. Lely Golf Estates (PUR) $ $ 5,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 20,000,000 6 70010 Jesse K. Water Meter Renewal and Replacement Program $ 200,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 4,000,000 $ 4,000,000 $ 4,000,000 $ 12,500,000 7 70014 Ben B. Real Property/Infrastructure Audit $ 25,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 225,000 8 70019 Jesse K. Cross Connections Program $ 50,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 4,050,000 9 70023 Shon F. Fire Hydrants Replacement $ 25,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 425,000 10 70031 Anthony S. Utility Master Plan $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 500,000 11 70034 Alicia A. Water Plant Concrete Structure Rehabilitation $ - $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 800,000 12 70041 Alicia A. Water Lighting/ Surge Protection &Grounding $ - $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 600,000 13 70045 Anthony S. FDOT Utility Construction Projects - W $ - $ 100,000 S 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 400,000 14 70069 Shon F. Tom S. Well/Plant Power System $ 3,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ OQ,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 7,000,000 15 70071 Anthony S. Countywide Utility Projects - Water $ - $ 50,000 $ Ifto $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 200,000 16 70084 Mike R. Wellfield SCADA Support Operating $ 250,000 $ 300,000 S 300, 00 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 1,450,000 17 70085 Tom S. Wellfield/Raw Water Booster Station Op TSP $ 4,500,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 14,000,000 18 70087 Ben B. Vanderbilt Dr WM $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 19 70102 Mike R. SCRWTP SCADA Support Operating $ 300,0 $ 350,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 1,500,000 20 70103 Tom S. Corinne T. NE Svs Area Interg $ $ - S - $ - $ - $ - $ - 21 70104 Tom S. Water Plant Compliance $ 1,200,00 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 1,600,000 22 70109 Alicia A. Lime Treatment TSP $ - 300, 00 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 1,200,000 23 70111 Close/BA NCRWTP Facilities $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 24 70113 Matt F. Facility Infrastructure Maint Water $ 5,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 1,215,000 25 70114 Matt F. Infrastructure TSP Field Ops-Water $ - $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 600,000 26 70118 Matt B Robin B. Infrastructure TSP -Water Plants $ 500,000 $ 1,300,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 2,100,000 27 70120 Diana D. Naples Pk Basin Optimization $ 2,300,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ - $ 17,300,000 28 70121 Amnia M. Utility Billing Customer Sery Software $ 10,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 10,000 29 70122 Diana D. VB DR CDS Basin 101 S $ $ - $ $ $ $ 30 70123 Diana D. Naples Park Water Main Replacement S $ $ - $ $ $ $ 31 70125 Close/BA BCHS W Main Replacement - Close Out S $ $ $ $ $ $ 32 70129 Ben B. VBR WM Replacement -Apt. to US41 $ $ $ S $ $ $ 33 70131 Jesse K. Large Meters Renewal & Replacement $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 3,400,000 34 70132 Close/BA SCRWTP Power Systems Reliability $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 400,000 1, 70134 Close/BA hnp GC Blvd WM Replacement Close out Project $ - $ - $ - S - $ - $ - $ - 36 70135 Alicia A. SCRWTP Reactor #4 $ - $ - $ - S - $ - $ - $ - 37 70136 Alicia A. Tom S. Water Plant Capital Projects $ 1,600,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 2,600,000 38 70167 Govemment Operations Business Park $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 39 70173 Tom S. Orangetme Plant TSP (op) $ - $ - $ - $ - 40 70174 Diana D. Shon F. Distribution Capital Projects (unplanned) $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 7,000,000 41 70176 Ben B. Goodland $ - $ - 42 70179 Close/BA 10raingetree HSP & Chloramine Systems Close out Project $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 43 70180 Diana D. Ben B. Warren St. Looping $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ a a 00 O a) I` N d a+ fC Q a LL L O a� C 3 O U d O U C t V fC a Packet Pg. 685 9.A.3.c Line No. Project No. ResponsibleI L Project Name FY 2024 Proposed Budget AUIR FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 Summary FY 2024-2028 44 70181 Alicia A. Ben B. Diana D. Trail Blvd. WM Replacement $ - $ - S - $ - $- 45 70185 Diana DYMCA Ben B.. Road AC WM Replacement $ - $ - S - $ 46 70188 Alicia A. Twin Eagles Mon Paul $ $ $ - $ $ $ $ 47 70189 Close/BA Cyber Security SCADA $ $ $ - $ $ $ $ 48 70192 Close Palm River Bridge Pipe Replacement Close out Project $ $ $ - S $ $ $ 49 70194 Craig P. NE Utility Facilities $ $ $ - S $ $ $ 50 70195 Diana D. Pelican Ridge AC Pipe Removal $ - $ - $ - S - $ - $ - $ - 51 70196 Tom S. Tamiami Wellfield $ - $ - $ 1,800,000 $ 1,800,000 $ 3,600,000 52 70197 Close/BA Lely PUR $ $ 53 70202 Anthony S. Collier County Utility Standards $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 100,000 54 70220 Close Golden Gate Interconnect Close out Project $ - $ - $ - S -- 55 70222 Corinne T. Shon F. Ben B. Golden Gate City Utility Compliance $ - $ - $ 900.000 S - $ - $ - $ 900,000 56 70229 Shon F. 1-75 / CR951 Utility $ - $ - $ - $ - S - $ - $ - 57 70242 Close/BA SCRWTP Ion Exchange Improvements $ - $ - $ - $ - S - $ - $ - 58 70244 Transportation VBR Extension - Utility Relocations $ - $ - $ - $ - S - $ - $ - 59 70247 Close/BA US 41 N Utility Replacement $ - $ - $ - $ - S - $ - $ - 60 70248 Diana D. US 41 East WM Replacement $ - $ - $- 61 70257 Diana D. Palm River PUR $ 4,500,000 S 5,000,000 $ - $ S,00( 000 S - $ 5,000,000 $ 14,500,000 62 70258 Tom S. NCRWTP Degasifiers Mods $ S $ - S - S $ $ 63 70260 Ben B. Goodland Commercial Water Main Replacement $ $ $ $ 64 70261 Plam/Pmnp Station Asphalt Overlay Program (Const) $ - $ - $ - $ - 65 70263 Shon F. Golden Gate WTP $ - $ - $ - 66 70264 Manatee Pump Station Yard Piping Improvements $ - $ 3,OOQ000 $ $ 3,000,000 $ $ $ 3,000,000 67 70265 Manatee Road Water Main Improvements $ S 1,000,000 $ $ 1,000,000 $ $ 1,000,000 68 70267 Tom S. NCRWTP Concentrate Well Pumps & Motor $ $ $ $ 69 70268 Cast Iron Water Main Replacement (Carica P.S to Airp) S $ $ $ $ $ 70 70271 Ben B. Tamiami Raw WM Replacement $ $ $ 71 70273 Generator Replacement Program $ $ 4,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 20,000,000 72 70275 WM Repl Carlton & Carts S $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ $ 4,000,000 73 70276 Alicia A. Goodland PS Improvements S $ 3,000,000 $ $ 3,000-000 74 70277 Tom S. NCRWTP Nano Skid Rehab- 75 70282 Diana D. Pine Ridge Road Utility Relocation- 76 71009 Dave M. Water Security Systems $ 150,000 $ 400,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 1,350,000 77 71010 Water Distribution System TSP $ - $ 1,000,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 1,600,000 78 71055 Mike R. NCRWTP SCADA Support Operating $ 150,000 $ 300,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 1,050,000 79 71056 Mike R. SCADA Compliance Assurance Program- Water $ 100,000 $ 125,000 $ 125,000 $ 125,000 $ 125,000 $ 125,000 $ 600,000 80 71057 Tom S. Membrane Replacement & Interstage Booster $ 1,400,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,400,000 81 71058 PUD General Legal Services $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 S 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 250,000 82 71063 Alicia A. Water Plant Variable Frequency Drives $ - $ 275,000 $ 275,000 $ 275,000 $ 275,000 $ 275,000 $ 1,100,000 83 71065 Alicia A. Ben B. SCRWTP Operating TSP $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 3,000,000 84 71066 Tom S. NCRWTP Operating TSP $ 1,000,000 $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 3,400,000 85 71067 Shon F. Distribution Repump Station TSP $ 100,000 $ 300,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 900,000 86 75005 Alicia A. Wellfield Program Management $ - $ 100,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 400,000 87 75017 Ben B. PUD Hydraulic Modeling $ 50,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 450,000 88 75018 Katrina L. Financial Services $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 150,000 89 75019 Anthony S. GM -Comprehensive Planning Technical Support $ 250,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 350,000 a a 00 00 a) I` N d a+ fC Q a LL L A O a+ C 3 0 U d 0 U C t V fC Q Packet Pg. 686 9.A.3.c Line No Project No. Responsible Project Name FY 2024 Proposed Budget AUIR FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 Summary FY 2024-2028 New 412 Water Projects $ - 90 70262 Golden Gate City PUR $ $ S - $ 500,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 4,500,000 91 WNEW11 TBD Variable TDS Treatment Bridge -the -Gap $ S - $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 92 WNEW12 TBD SCRWTP Odor Control - RO $ $ $ $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 93 WNEW 13 TBD Raw Water Main Fusible PVC Replacement $ $ $ - $ $ $ $ 94 70286 TBD PCCP Replacement (Phi - Carica PS to Airport) $ 300,000 $ $ $ 300,000 95 70285 TBD Airport Road Cast Iron Water Main Repl (VBR to Pine Ridge) $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 6,500,000 $ 7,000,000 96 WNEW19 TBD Water Main Replacement with high failure rates $ $ 300,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 4,300,000 97 WNEW20 TBD Tamiami Raw Water Main under Golden Gate Canal $ $ 98 70283 Shon F. Ben B. SCRWTP Improvements/Expansion $ - $ 2,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 17,000,000 99 70287 TBD NCRWTP Facility Plan/Improvements/Reliability Expansion $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 WNEW24 Future PUR (CastTron WM replacement near Carica) $ 2,000,000 $ 500,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,500,000 WNEW25 CCWSD Building $ 5,000,000 $ - TOTAL FUND 412 WATER Projects $ 24,575,000 $ 42,025,000 $ 46,575,000 $ 47,175,000 $ 46,325,000 $ 44,025,000 $ 208,675,000 Existing 419 Bond Funded Projects Water Impact Fee 109 70194 Craig P. Perimeter Wellfield Design Update $ 2,620,804 $ - S - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,620,804 110 70194 Craig P. Drill perimeter wells (14 wells — $1.75M/well) $ 25,000,000 $ - $ - S - $ - $ 25,000,000 ill 70194 Craig P. CEI & CA - Drill perimeter wells (14 wells — $1.75M/well) $ 5,000,000 $ - $ - $ - S - $ - $ 5,000,000 112 70194 Craig P. Construct deep injection well $ 12,500,000 $ - $ - S - $ 12,500,000 113 70253 Ban B' Liz G. Golden Gate City Utility Ph 1 & 2 (Transmission) $ - $ - TOTAL FUND 419 WATER Impact Fee $ 5,120,804 $ - $ - 5 - 5 - $ - $ 45,120,804 Existing 419 Bond Funded Projects Water User Fee 114 1 70167 1 Government Operations Business Park (User Fee) S - S - $ - $ - S - $ - TOTAL FUND 419 WATER User Fee S $ - TOTAL FUND 419 WATER Projects 4q,500,000 $ $ S S $ $ 42,500,000 Projects which will require Commercial Paper 115 70194 Craig P. Town of Big Cypress Water Reimbursement + 10% CEI (Impact Fe $ 1,198,450 $ 1,198,450 116 70194 1 Craig P. I Belmar Water Reimbursement+ 10% CEI (Impact Fee) $ 1,798,060 $ 1,798,060 TOTAL Projects which will require Commercial Paper $ - $ - $ 2,996,510 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,996,510 Projects which will require Bond/Loan -Impact Fee / User Fee 115 70194 Craig P. Const South Wellfield (5 wells) - 50% W, 50% W W - IQ $ $ 3,750,000 $ $ $ 3,750,000 116 70194 Craig P. CEI & CA - Const South Wellfield (5 wells) - 50% W, 50% W W - IQ $ - $ 750.000 $ - $ 750,000 117 70194 Craig P. Construct 10 mgd NECWTP (Impact Fee) $ - $ - $ - $ - 5 - $ - 118 70194 Craig P. CEI & CA - 10 mgd NECWTP (Impact Fee) $ $ - $ $ - $ 119 70194 Craig P. Construct Perimeter Wellfield (14 wells) $ 120 70194 Craig P. CEI & CA - Construct Perimeter Wellfield (14 wells) $ 121 70194 Craig P. Construct Common Area Facilities $ - $ 122 70194 Craig P. CEI & CA - Construct Common Area Facilities $ $ 123 70194 Craig P. North Collier Aquifer Analysis $ $ TOTAL Projects which will require Bond/Loan -Impact Fee / User Fee 1 $ is $ 4,500,000 1$ $ $ $ 4,500,000 a a Packet Pg. 687 9.A.3.c Line No. Project No. Responsible Project Name FY 2024 Proposed Budget AUIR FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FV 2028 Summary FY 2024-2028 Total Water Impact Fee Projects (411) $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Total Water User Fees Projects (412) $ 24,575,000 $ 42,025,000 $ 46,575,000 $ 47,175,000 $ 46,325,000 $ 44,025,000 $ 208,675,000 Total NE Bond Funded Projects (415) $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Total NE Bond Funded Projects (419) $ 42,500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 42,500,000 Total Commercial Paper Funded Projects (420) $ - $ - $ 2,996,510 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,996,510 Total Future Bond $ - $ - $ 4,500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 4,500,000 TOTAL WATER PROJECTS (411, 412 & 415) excl new loans (419) $ 24,575,000 $ 42,025,000 $ 46,575,000 $ 47,175,000 $ 46,325,000 $ 44,025,000 $ 208,675,000 TOTAL WATER PROJECTS (411, 412, 415 & incl new loans 419) Is 67,075,000 1 $ 42,025,000 1 $ 46,575,000 1 $ 47,175,000 1 $ 46,325,000 1 $ 44,025,000 1 $ 251,175,000 a a w 00 a) I- N d Q a L O r i 3 O U L d 0 U c 0) E t v m Q Packet Pg. 688 9.A.3.c Line No. Project No. Project Name FY 2023-2027 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 FY2033 FY 2029-2033 Summary FY 2023-2032 Existing 412 NVatcr Projects 2 50105 Integrated Asset Management Program $ 900,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,900,000 3 50154 Hurricane Irma $ $ $ $ $ $ 4 50199 COVID-19 $ $ $ $ $ $ 5 60224 Lely Golf Estates (PUR) $ 20,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 25,000,000 $ 45,000,000 6 70010 Water Meter Renewal and Replacement Program $ 12,500,000 $ 4,000,000 $ 4,000,000 $ 4,000,000 $ 4,000,000 $ 4,000,000 $ 20,000,000 $ 32,500,000 7 70014 Real Property/Infrastructure Audit $ 225,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 250,000 $ 475,000 8 70019 Cross Connections Program $ 4,050,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 9,050,000 9 70023 Fire Hydrants Replacement $ 425,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 500,000 $ 925,000 10 70031 Utility Master Plan $ 500,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 500,000 $ 1,000,000 11 70034 Water Plant Concrete Structure Rehabilitation $ 800,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,800,000 12 70041 Water Lighting/ Surge Protection & Grounding $ 600,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 750,000 $ 1,350,000 13 1 70045 IFDOT Utility Construction Projects - W $ 400,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 500,000 $ 900,000 14 70069 Well/Plant Power System $ 7,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 000,000 Ail $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 12,000,000 15 70071 Countywide Utility Projects - Water $ 200,000 $ 50,000 $ dff 50,000 $ ,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 250,000 $ 450,000 16 70084 Wellfield SCADA Support Operating $ 1,450,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 70,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 2,950,000 17 70085 WellfieldBaw Water Booster Station Op TSP $ 14,000,000 $ 6,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 12,500,000 $ 26,500,000 18 70087 Vanderbilt Dr WM $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 19 70102 SCRWTP SCADA Support Operating $ 1,500,000 $ 300.000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 3,000,000 20 70103 NE Svs Area Interg $ - $ - S $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 21 70104 Water Plant Compliance $ 1,600,000 $ 100,000 $ ,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 500,000 $ 2,100,000 22 70109 Lime Treatment TSP $ 1,200,000 $ 300,0 3 0,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 2,700,000 23 70111 NCRWTP Facilities $ - S - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 24 70113 Facility Infrastructure Maint Water $ 1,215,000 $ 300,000 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 2,715,000 25 70114 Infrastructure TSP Field Ops-Water $ 600,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 750,000 $ 1,350,000 26 70118 Infrastructure TSP-Water Plants $ 2,100,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 4,100,000 27 70120 Naples Pk Basin Optimization $ 17,300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - S - $ - $ 17,300,000 28 70121 Utility Billing Customer Sery Software $ 10,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - S - S - $ 10,000 29 70122 VB DR CDS Basin 101 $ $ $ $ $ - $ 30 70123 Naples Park Water Main Replacement $ $ $ $ $ - $ S $ 31 70125 BCHS W Main Replacement - Close Out $ $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ 32 70129 VBR WM Replacement -Apt. to US41 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 33 70131 Large Meters Renewal & Replacement $ 3,400,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 8,400,000 34 70132 SCRWTP Power Systems Reliability $ 400,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 500,000 $ 900,000 35 70134 Imp GC Blvd WM Replacement Close out Project $ - $ - 'S - $ - $ - S - $ - $ - 36 70135 SCRWTP Reactor#4 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - S - $ - $ - 37 70136 Water Plant Capital Projects $ 2,600,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 1,250,000 $ 3,850,000 38 70167 Government Operations Business Park $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 39 70173 Orangetree Plant TSP (op) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 40 70174 Distribution Capital Projects (unplanned) $ 7,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 12,000,000 70176 Goodland $ - $ - 42 70179 Orangetree HSP & Chloramine Systems Close out Project $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 43 70180 Warren St. Looping $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - a a Packet Pg, 689 9.A.3.c Line No. Project No. Project Name FY 2023-2027 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 FY2033 FY 2029-2033 Summary FY 2023-2032 44 70181 Trail Blvd. WM Replacement $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 45 70185 YMCA Road AC WM Replacement $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 46 70188 Twin Eagles Mon Panl $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 47 70189 Cyber Security SCADA $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 48 70192 Palm River Bridge Pipe Replacement Close out Project $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 49 70194 NE Utility Facilities $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 50 70195 Pelican Ridge AC Pipe Removal $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 51 70196 Tamiami Wellfield $ 3,600,000 $ 1,800,000 $ 1,800,000 $ 1,800,000 $ 5,400,000 $ 9,000,000 52 70197 LelyPUR $ S $ $ $ 53 70202 Collier County Utility Standards $ 100,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 S 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 100,000 $ 200,000 54 70220 Golden Gate Interconnect Close out Project $ - $ - $ - - S - $ - $ - $ - 55 70222 Golden Gate City Utility Compliance $ 900,000 $ - $400 - $ - $ - $ - $ 900,000 56 70229 I-75 / CR951 Utility $ - $ - $ - S - $ - $ - $ - $ - 57 70242 SCRWTP Ion Exchange Improvements $ - $ - $ - S - $ - $ - $ - $ - 58 70244 VBR Extension - Utility Relocations $ - $ - S - S - $ - $ - $ - $ - 59 70247 US 41 N Utility Replacement S - $ - S - S - $ - $ - $ - $ - 60 70248 US 41 East WM Replacement S - $ $ - S - $ - $ - $ - $ - 61 70257 Palm River PUR S 14,500,000 $ 5,000 000 S - $ - $ - $ 5,000,000 $ 19,500,000 62 70258 NCRWTP Degasifiers Mods S $ $ - S $ $ 63 70260 Goodland Commercial Water Main Replacement S $ S - S $ $ - $ $ - 64 70261 Plant/Pump Station Asphalt Overlay Program (Const) S - S - $ - S - $ - $ - $ - $ - 65 70263 Golden Gate WTP $ - $ - - S - $ - $ - $ - $ - 66 70264 Manatee Pump Station Yard Piping Improvements $ 3,000,000 $ - S $ $ - $ $ 3,000,000 67 70265 Manatee Road Water Main Improvements $ 1,000,000 $ - S $ $ $ $ 1,000,000 68 70267 NCRWTP Concentrate Well Pumps & Motor $ $ $ - S $ $ $ $ 69 70268 Cast Iron Water Main Replacement (Carica P.S to Airp) $ - $ $ S $ $ $ $ 70 70271 Tamiami Raw WM Replacement $ $ $ S $ $ $ $ 71 70273 Generator Replacement Program 20,000,000 $ $ S $ $ $ $ 20,000,000 72 70275 WM Repl Carlton & Calls $ 4,000,000 $ $ $ $ $ - $ $ 4,000,000 73 70276 Goodland PS Improvements $!%3,000,000 $ $ $ $ $ - $ $ 3,000,000 74 70277 NCRWTP Nano Skid Rehab $ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 70282 Pine Ridge Road Utility Relocation $ - $ - 76 71009 Water Security Systems $ 1,331l,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 3,350,000 77 71010 Distribution System TSP $ 1,600,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 6,600,000 78 71055 NCRWTP SCADA Support Operating $ 1,050,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 2,550,000 79 71056 SCADA Compliance Assurance Program- Water $ 600,000 $ 125,000 $ 125,000 $ 125,000 $ 125,000 $ 125,000 $ 625,000 $ 1,225,000 80 71057 Membrane Replacement & Interstage Booster $ 1,400,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,400,000 81 71058 General Legal Services $ 250,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 250,000 $ 500,000 82 71063 Water Plant Variable Frequency Drives $ 1,100,000 $ 275,000 $ 275,000 $ 275,000 $ 275,000 $ 275,000 $ 1,375,000 $ 2,475,000 83 71065 SCRWTP Operating TSP $ 3,000,000 $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 6,000,000 84 71066 NCRWTP Operating TSP $ 3,400,000 $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 6,400,000 85 71067 Distribution Repump Station TSP $ 900,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 2,400,000 86 75005 Wellfield Program Management $ 400,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 750,000 $ 1,150,000 87 75017 PUT) Hydraulic Modeling $ 450,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 500,000 $ 95Q000 88 75018 Financial Services $ 150,000 $ 3Q000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 150,000 $ 30Q,000 89 75019 GM Comprehensive Planning Technical Support $ 350,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 125,000 $ 475,000 $ $ $ a a 00 00 a) I` N d fC Q a LL L O C 3 O U d O U C E t v M a Packet Pg. 690 9.A.3.c noun nuunn W Line No. Project No. Project Name FY 2023-2027 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 FY2033 FY 2029-2033 Summary FY 2023-2032 New 412 Water Projects $ - $ - $ 90 70262 Golden Gate City PUR $ 4,500,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 10,000,000 $ 14,500,000 91 WNEWI1 Variable TDS Treatment Bridge -the -Gap $ 2,000,000 $ 7,000,000 $ 7,000,000 $ 7,000,000 $ $ 21,000,000 $ 23,000,000 92 WNEW12 SCRWTP Odor Control - RO $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ $ $ $ 2,000,000 $ 4,000,000 93 WNEW13 Raw Water Main Fusible PVC Replacement $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 94 70286 PCCP Replacement (Phl - Carica PS to Airport) $ 300,000 $ 4,000,000 $ 4,000,000 $ 4,000,000 $ 12,000,000 $ 12,300,000 95 70285 Airport Road Cast Iron Water Main Repl (VBR to Pine Ridge) $ 7,000,000 $ - $ 7,000,000 96 WNEW19 Water Main Replacement with high failure rates $ 4,300,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 10,000,000 $ 14,300,000 97 WNEW20 Tamiami Raw Water Main under Golden Gate Canal $ $ 98 70283 SCRWTP IWrovements/Expansion $ 17,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 25,000,000 $ 42,000,000 NCRWTP Facility Plan/Improvements/Reliability Expansion $ - WNEW23 Future PUR $ 2,500,000 S 2,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 7,000,000 $ 9,500,000 WNEW24 CCWSD Building $ - $ - $ - TOTAL FUND 412 WATER Projects $ 207,675,000 $ 46,425,000 $ 42,625,000 $ 45,425,000 $ 39,625,000 $ 36,425,000 $ 210,525,000 $ 418,200,000 Existing 419 Bond Funded Projects Water Impact Fee 109 70194 #REF! $ 2,620,804 $ - $ - $ - $ - S - $ - $ 2,620,804 110 70194 CET & CA - Drill perimeter wells (14 wells — $1.75M/well) $ 25,000,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - S - $ - $ 25,000,000 ill 70194 0 $ 5,000,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - S - $ - $ 5,000,000 112 70194 Construct deep injection well $ 12,500,000 $ - $ 12,500,000 113 70253 Golden Gate City Utility Ph 1 & 2 (Transmission) $ - S - $ - TOTAL FUND 419 WATER Impact Fee $ 45,120,804 $ - $ - S - $ - S - $ 45,120,804 Existing 419 Bond Funded Projects Water User Fee 114 1 70167 Govemment Operations Business Park (User Fee) $ - S - $ - S - S - S - S - $ - TOTAL FUND 419 WATER User Fee $ - S S S S S $ - TOTAL FUND 419 WATER Projects $ 42,500,000 $ S S S S $ 45,120,804 115 70170 Town of Big Cypress Water Reimbursement+ 10% CEI (Impact Fee) $ 1,198,450 $ - $ - $ - S - S - S - $ I,198,450 116 70171 Belmar Water Reimbursement+ 10% CEI (Impact Fee) $ 1,798,060 $ - $ - $ - S - S - S - $ 1,798,060 TOTAL Projects which will require Commercial Paper $ 2,996,510 $ $ $ $ $ S $ 2,996,510 Pro'e Projects which will require Bond/Loan - User Fee 115 70194 Coast South Wellfield (5 wells) - 50% W, 50% W W - IQ $ 3,750,000 $ $ $ $ - S - $ $ 3,750,000 116 70167 �&ICQA - Const South Wellfield (5 wells) - 50% W, 50% $ 750,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - S - $ - $ 750,000 117 70194 Construct 10 mgd NECWTP (Impact Fee) $ - $ 146,900,000 $ - $ - $ - S - $ 146,900,000 $ 146,900,000 118 70194 CEI & CA - 10 mgd NECWTP (Impact Fee) $ $ 29,380,000 $ $ $ - S - $ 29,380,000 $ 29,380,000 119 70194 Construct Perimeter Wellfield (14 wells) $ $ 21,000,000 $ 21,000,000 $ 21,000,000 120 70194 CET & CA - Construct Perimeter Wellfield (14 wells) $ $ 4,200,000 $ 4,200,000 $ 4,200,000 121 70168 JConstructCommcnArea Facilities $ $ 15,000,000 $ $ $ - S - $ 15,000,000 $ 15,000,000 122 70169 ICEI & CA - Construct Common Area Facilities $ $ 3,000,000 $ $ $ - S - $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000 123 70172 INorth Collier Aquifer Analysis $ $ 800,000 $ $ $ - S - $ 8o0,000 $ 800,000 TOTAL Projects which will require Bond/Loan - User Fee $ 4,500,000 $ 220,280,000 $ $ $ $ 220, $ 280,0o0 $ 224,780,000 a a 00 00 a) I- N d a+ ft3 Q a LL U) O A C 3 O U L d 0 U C Q E t V M r a+ a Packet Pg. 691 9.A.3.c ruaw araraa Line No. Project No. Project Name FY 2023-2027 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 Oki FY 2032 FY2033 FY 2029-2033 Summary FY 2023-2032 Total Water Impact Fee Projects (411) $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Total Water User Fees Projects (412) $ 208,675,000 $ 46,425,000 $ 42,625,000 $ 45,425,000 $ 39,625,000 $ 36,425,000 $ 210,525,000 $ 419,200,000 Total NE Bond Funded Projects (415) $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Total NE Bond Funded Projects (419) $ 42,500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 42,500,000 Total Commercial Paper Funded Projects (420) $ 2,996,510 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,996,510 Total Future Bond $ 4,SOQ,050 $ 220,280,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 220,280,000 $ 224,780,000 TOTAL WATER PROJECTS (411, 412 & 415) excl new loans (419) $ 208,675,000 $ 46,425,000 $ 42,625,000 $ 45,425,000 $ 39,625,000 $ 36,425,000 $ 210,525,000 $ 419,200,000 TOTAL WATER PROJECTS (411, 412, 415 & incl new loans 419) IS 251,175,000 $ 46,425,000 $ 42,625,000 $ 45,425,000 $ 39,625,000 1 $ 36,425,000 1 $ 210,525,000 1 $ 461,700,000 a a tp 00 a) h N d Q a LL L O r i 3 O U L d 0 U c E t v m Q Packet Pg. 692 9.A.3.c 2022 WASTEWATER 10-YEAR CH' PLAN UPDATE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS 2023-2027 WASTEWATER (NON -IQ) AND IRRIGATION QUALITY (IQ) WATER Line No. Project No. Responsible Project Name FV 2024 Proposed Budget AUIR FY 2024 FY 2025 FV 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 Summary FY 2023-2027 Existing 414 Wastewater (Non -IQ) Projects $ 1 33842 FDEP Statewide Water Restoration $ - 2 50105 Facilities Integrated Asset Management Program 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200.000 S 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 1,000,000 3 50110 Biosolids Reuse Facility $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 4 50154 Close/BA Hurricane Irma $ $ $ $ $ $ - 5 50196 Matt F. Chiller NCWRF Ops Bldg $ S $ $ $ $ 6 50199 Close/BA COVID-19 $ $ $ $ $ $ 7 50391 Harry R. WW Hurricane Resiliency $ $ $ $G. $ $ 8 60224 Liz Stormwater Lely Golf Estates s 675,000 $ 6,000,000 S 6,00 ,000 $ 6,000,000 $ 6,000,000 $ 6,000,000 $ 24,675,000 9 70014 Ben B. Real Property/Infrastructure Audit $ 80,000 S 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 280,000 10 70031 Anthony S. Utilities Master Plan S 100,000 S 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 500,000 11 70043 Close/BA Gravity Sewers TSP CAP $ - $ - $ $ - $ $ 12 70044 Close/BA Force Main Improvements Cap AV S $ $ 5 S $ 13 70046 Wastewater Pump Station TSP Pft S $ $ $ S $ 14 70050 Close/BA Master Pump Stations TSP Cap $ $ $ $ $ $ 15 70053 Close/BA NCWRF Power System TSP $ S $ $ $ $ 16 70055 Close/BA SCWRF Power System Cap AW $ $ $ $ $ $ - 17 70060 Mike R. NCWRF SCADA Support Operating TSP 350,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 1,550,000 18 70061 Mike R. SCWRF SCADA Support Operating TSP $ 350,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 1,550,000 19 70103 Close/BA NE Svs Area Interg $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 20 70117 Robin B. Dayan H. WW Remote Sites MSP $ 80,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 880,000 21 70119 Robin B. Matt F. WW Treatment Plants MSP $ - $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 1,600,000 22 70120 Diana D. Naples Pk Basin Optimization $ 5,500,000 $ 8,000,000 $ 8,000,000 $ 8,000,000 $ 8,000,000 $ 40,000,000 23 70121 Annia M. Utility Billing Customer Sery Software $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 10,000 24 70122 Close/BA VB DR CDS Basin 101 $ $ $ $ $ $ - 25 70139 Connne T. Diana D. Damian C. Basin 101 Program Capital $ $ $ $ $ $ a a w 00 a) I,- N d Q a LL L O C 3 O U d O U C E t V tB a Packet Pg. 693 9.A.3.c Line No. Project No. Responsible Project Name FY 2024 Proposed Budget AUIR FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 Summary FY 2023-2027 26 70141 Zamira D. Basin 305 Program Capital (Pump Stations) $ 500,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 12,500,000 27 70142 Ismael I. Basin 306 Program Capital $ - $ 1,000,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 6,000,000 28 70143 Lourdes S. Gravity Transmission Systems TSP $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 29 70144 Corinne T. Damain C. Force Main Transmission Systems TSP $ 100,000 $ 250,000 $ 200,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 1,200,000 30 70145 Corinne T. W W Pump Station TSP $ TT0009 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 31 70146 Close/BA Master PS TSP Op $ $ $ $ $ $ - 32 70147 Close/BA Collections Power System TSP $ $ $ $ $ $ - 33 70148 Peter S. Wayne K. Water Reclamation Facilities TSP $ 1,000,000 $ 4,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 21,000,000 34 70149 Wayne K. Craig P. NCWRF New Headworks $ 4,094,200 $ 10,000 0 $ 500,000 $ 12,500,000 $ - $ - $ 29,094,200 35 70164 Close/BA W W Collections SCADA Telemetry $ - $ $ - $ $ $ 36 70167 Facilities Government Operations Business Park $ - $ - S - $ - $ - 37 70173 Ben B. Peter S. Tom S. Orangetree Compliance S 100,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 30Q000 S 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 1,300,000 38 70183 Close/BA Pump Station 300.06 $ $ - $ $ - $ - $ - 39 70189 Mike R. Cyber Security SCADA $ $ $ $ $ - $ 40 70192 Close/BA Palm River Bridge Pipe Replacement $ $ $ $ $ $ 41 70194 Craig P. NE Utility Facilities $ $ $ $ $ $ 42 70202 Harry R. County Utility Standards $ $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 100,000 43 70204 Peter S. SCWRF IQ Storage Improvements S $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 44 70207 Ismael I. MPS 301 Rehabilitation $ 750,000 S $ $ $ $ $ 750,000 45 70208 Close/BA PS 302.07 Gravity Sewer S $ $ $ $ $ - 46 70213 Close/BA MPS 300 Rehab S S $ $ $ $ - 47 70214 Dan R. MPS 107 Re -Configuration S $ $ $ $ $ 48 70215 Lourdes S. MPS 302 Reconfiguration S $ $ $ $ $ - 49 70217 Damian C. MPS 309 Replacement (E Naples Middle School) $ S $ 5,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ $ $ 10,000,000 50 70222 Ben B. Golden Gate City CAP S 1,290,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 3,290,000 51 70229 Short F. I-75 / CR951 Utility $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 52 70230 Close/BA MPS 308 Force Main $ $ $ $ $ - $ - 53 70233 Close/BA Logan Blvd FM (Immkl - VB) $ $ $ $ $ $ 54 70234 Harry R. Eliminate NPDES $ - $ $ 2,250,000 $ 2,250,000 $ $ $ 4,500,000 55 70237 Close/BA MPS 306 $ $ - $ - $ $ $ - 56 70240 WW Collections Operating TSP 3,600,000 $ 3,500,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 3,500.000 $ 3,500,000 $ 3,500,000 $ 16,600,000 57 70243 Corinne T. Craig P. Golden Gate WWTP $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ 58 70244 Alicia A. VBR Extension - Util S $ $ $ $ 59 70245 Close/BA NCWRF DZMW S $ $ $ $ $ a a Packet Pg. 694 9.A.3.c Line No. Project No. Responsible Project Name FY 2024 Proposed Budget AUIR FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 Summary FY 2023-2027 60 70247 Dan R. US 41 N Utility Replacement $ $ - $ - S - $ $ 61 70249 Dan R. MPS 313 Relocation $ 2,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 2.000.000 S 2,000,000 $ 5,000,000 62 70250 Close/BA Villagewalk WW Rehab $ $ - $ - S - $ $ 63 70251 Wayne Craig P. SCWRF Plant PS # 5 $ $ $ S $ $ 64 70254 Close/BA PS 305.17 and FM $ S $ S $ $ 65 70255 Close/BA GGWTP Forcemain $ S $ S $ $ - 66 70256 Damian C. I-75 Force Main Replacement $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 67 70257 Diana D. Liz G. Palm River PUR $ 6,000,000 $ 3,000,000 $ $ 8,000,000 $ $ 8,000,000 $ 22,000,000 68 70259 Dan R. MPS 316 Force Main Relocation $ - $ $ $ $ $ 69 70262 Craig P. Golden Gate City PUR $ - A $ $ 500,000 $ 500,000 70 70270 Craig P. SCWRF CL 2 Mods $ $ $ $ $ $ 71 70272 Lourdes S. ARV Replacement Program $ 1,150.000 $ 2,850,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 7,150,000 72 70273 TBD Generator Replacement Program $ 650,000 $ 650.000 $ 650.000 $ 650,000 $ 650,000 $ 2,600,000 73 70279 Alicia A. WW DIW Mgmt & TSP $ $ $ $ - $ - $ 74 70280 WW Valve Replacement Prgm A $ 75 70281 WW Electrical Upgrades Program $ 76 70282 Pine Ridge Road Utility Relocation $ - 77 71058 PUD General Legal Services $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 500,000 78 72009 Zamim D. Damian C. Western Interconnect $ - $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 3,000,000 79 72013 Matt F. Robin B. Facility Infrastructure Maint Wastewater $ 200,000 $� 350,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 350,000 $ 1,150,000 80 72505 Dave M. WW Security Systems $ 250,000 $ 500,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 1,750,000 81 72541 Mike R. SCADA Compliance Assurance Program- Wastewater $ 100,000 $ 105,000 $ 110,000 $ 115,000 $ 115,000 $ 115,000 $ 555,000 82 73045 Anthony S. FDOT Utility Construction Projects - W W $ $ 1,000,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 2,000,000 83 73065 AnthonyS. TBD CW Util Proj-WW ff - $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 800,000 84 73922 Mike R. WW Collection SCADA Telemetry .50,000 $ 200,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 750,000 85 73944 Annia M. Cost Svs Billing $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 86 73968 Close/BA NCWRF Technical Support Program $ $ $ $ $ $ 87 73969 Close/BA SCWRF Technical Support Program $ - $ $ $ $ $ 88 74310 Tara C. State Revolving Loan Funding $ 10,000 $ $ $ $ $ 89 75009 Tara C. Grant Applications $ - $ $ $ $ - $ - 90 75017 Damian C. PUD Hydraulic Modeling S 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 500,000 91 75018 Katrina L. Financial Services $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 150,000 92 75019 A"�BD S. rAm Comprehensive Planning Technical Support $ 250,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 450,000 93 33667 Damian C. HMGP PUD Gen H0419 $ - $ $ $ - $ - $ a a Packet Pg. 695 9.A.3.c Line No. Project No. Responsible Project Name FY 2024 Proposed Budget AUIR FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 Summary FY 2023-2027 94 7XXXX TBD SCWRF New Headworks $ 250,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 25,000,000 $ 25,000,000 $ 52,000,000 95 70278 Mike R. NCWRF Switchgear #1 Replacement $ 6,000,000 $ 6,000,000 $ $ - $ - $ - $ 6,000,000 96 70274 TBD MPS 310 Reconfiguration and Rehabilitation $ - $ 2,500,000 $ $ 2,500,000 $ $ $ 2,500,000 97 70284 TBD MPS 103 Replacement $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 3,000,000 $ $ $ 3,500,000 98 WWNEW TBD Wastewater Valve Replacement - Multi Year Program $ - $ 375,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 1,000,000 99 WWNEW TBD Wastewater Electrical Upgrades - Multi year program $ $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 1,500,000 TOTAL 414 WASTEWATER (NON -IQ) Projects $ 36,159,200 58,895,000 $ 56,815,000 $ 71,420,000 $ 61,620,000 $ 67,770,000 $ 293,784,200 $ 30,228,900 $ 69.420.000 S 28,380.000 63% 4% 20% -16 % 10% Existing 414 Irrigation Quality Water Projects 100 70056 TBD IQ Power Systems $ 240,000 $ 240,000 101 70062 Mike R. IQ SCADA Support Operating $ 300,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 1,900,000 102 70166 Lourdes S. Damian C. Harry R. IQ Water System TSP $ 300,000 $ 750,000 'N $ 0,000 $ 750,000 $ 750,000 $ 750,000 $ 3,300,000 103 74030 Zamira D. IQ Aquifer Storage and Recovery $ - $ - $ - S - S - $ - New 414 Irrigation Quality Water Projects $ 104 WWNEW TBD Pelican Bay New Storage Tank $ S $ $ $ $ 105 WWNEW TBD Pelican Bay Facility $ S $ $ $ $ - 106 70234 Harry R. Foxfire supplemental wells $ 3,000,000 S 3,000,000 $ $ $ 2,000,000 $ 5,000,000 TOTAL 414 IRRIGATION QUALITY WATER Projects $ 4,150,000 $ 4,150,000 $ 1,150,000 $ 1,150,000 $ 3,390,000 S 10,440,000 $ 1,650,000 S 1,150,000 $ 1,500,000 S 1,390,000 S 3,390,000 TOTAL FUND 414 Projects $ 36,759,200 $ 63,045,000 $ 60,965,000 $ 72,570,000 $ 62,770,000 $ 71,160,000 $ 304,224,200 $ 31,878,900 $ 1,150,000 $ 70,920,000 $ 1,390,000 $ 31,770,000 #uu uu uu a a Packet Pg. 696 9.A.3.c Line No. Project No. Responsible Project Name Sxisting 419 Bond Funded Projects Wastewater - Impact Fee 120 70194 Craig P. Design updates to 10 mgd NECWTP. 121 70194 Craig P. South Wellfield+Trans Mains Phase 1 122 70194 Craig P. Construct deep injection well (2) $ 123 70194 Craig P. Final Brightshore Transmission Mains$ 124 70243 Corinne T. Craig P. W Golden Gate City W TP Emergency PO $ 125 70243 Corinne T. Craig P. DIW design $ 126 70243 Corinne T. Craig P. GG Transmission Phase 1B Force Main $ 127 70194 Craig P. Transmission Mains Phase 2A (southern portion) $ 128 70194 Craig P. CEI & CA - Transmission Mains Phase 2A (southern portion) S 129 70194 Craig P. Transmission Mains Phase 2B (northern portion) $ 130 70194 Craig P. CEI & CA - Transmission Mains Phase 2B (northern portion) $ FY 2024 Proposed AUIR FY 2024 Budget $ 5,626,190 $ - $ 5,000,000 S 4,500,000 5,000,000 140,000 1,024,643 5,000,000 1,000,000 7,500,000 1,500,000 FY 2025 1 FY 2026 1 FY 2027 1 FY 2028 Summarya FY 2023-2027 $ 5,626,190 SZ $ 5,000,000 Q $ 12,500,000 O $ 4,500,000 L r R $ 5,000,000 L $ 140,000 d O $ 5,000,000 Q $ 1,000,000 CD CDCD$ 7,500,000 O V $ 1,500,000 N CD N $ 47,766,190 J a w 00 6'1 $ 1,400,000 tV $ 1,400,000 d a+ fC $ 49,166,190 Q a $ 1,127,294 LL $ 2,614,095 $ 5,095,390 L O $ 2,308,130 $ 11,144,910 3 O U $ 112,000,000 d O $ 1,200,000 U $ 15,000,000 E t $ 117,000,000 U Total Existing 419 Bond Funded Projects Wastewater - Impact Fee $ 48,790,833 $ - $ - $ Is Is Existing 419 Bond Funded Projects Wastewater - User Fee 131 70243 Corinne T. Craig P. IQ to Golf Course otal Existing 419 Bond Funded Projects Wastewater - User Fee OTAL FUND 419 Projects rojects which will require Commercial Paper 132 70194 Craig P. W Town of Big Cypress W Reimbursement + 10% CEI (Impact Fee) 133 70194 Craig P. Belmar W Reimbursement + 10% CEI (Impact Fee) W 134 70194 Craig P. Town of Big Cypress IQ Reimbursement+ 10% CEI (User Fee) 135 70194 Craig P. Belmar IQ Reimbursement + 10% CEI (User Fee) OTAL Projects which will require Commercial Paper rojects which will require New Bond/Loan - Impact FeeW 136 70243 Corinne T. Craig P. Golden Gate City W TP Expansion 4 mgd (2.5 mgd additional treatment capacity) - 62.5% Impact FeeW 137 70243 Corinne T. Craig P. CEI - Golden Gate City W TP Expansion 4 mgd (2.5 mgd additional treatment capacity) - 62.5% Impact Fee 138 70243 Corinne T. Craig P. Construct Golden Gate City DIW 13 770194 Craig P. Construct 4 mgd NECWRF + CEI & CA (0.75 mgd existing Orange Tree flow; 3.25 mgd additional treatment capacity) - 81.25 % Impact Fee $ 1,40Q000 1,4UU,000 $ 50,19U,833 $ S $ 1,127,294 $ 2,614,095 $ 5,095,390 $ 2,308,130 $ 11,144,910 $ $ 112,000,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 15,000,000 $ 117,000,000 to Q Packet Pg. 697 9.A.3.c Line No. Project No. Responsible Project Name FY 2024 Proposed Budget AUIR FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 Summary FY 2023-2027 t40 70194 Craig P. Const South Wellfield (5 wells) - 50% W, 50% W W - IQ $ 3,750,000 $ 3,750,000 141 70194 Craig P. �&ICQA - Const South Wellfield (5 wells) - 50% W, 50% $ 750,000 $ 750,000 142 70194 Craig P. Construct Common Area Facilities $ - 143 70194 Craig P. CEI & CA - Construct Common Area Facilities $ 144 70167 Facilities Government Operations Business Park (R&R - NEW BOND - User Fee) $ $ S $ S $ 145 7XXXX TBD Golden Gate City converting to sewer - need financing info. (Grant) Est S $ TOTAL Projects which will require Bond/Loan - Impact Fee S $ 128,200,000 $ $ 121,500,000 $ S 249,700,000 Projects which will require New Bond/Loan - User Fee 146 70243 Corinne T. Craig P. Golden Gate City W WTP Expansion 4 mgd (2.5 mgd additional treatment capacity) - 37.5% User Fee $ 28,000,000 $ 28,000,000 147 70243 Corinne T. Craig P. CEI - Golden Gate City W WTP Expansion 4 mgd (2.5 mgd additional treatment capacity) - 37.5% User Fee $ 300,000 $ 300,000 148 70194 Craig P. Construct 4 mgd NECWRF + CEI & CA (0.75 mgd existing Orange Tree flow; 3.25 mgd additional treatment capacity) - 18.75 % User Fee $ - $ 27,000,000 $ 27,000,000 149 70194 Craig P. Construct Common Area Facilities $ - 150 70194 Craig P. CEI & CA - Construct Common Area Facilities $ - TOTAL Projects which will require Bond/Loan - User Fee $ $ $ 28,300,000 $ $ 27,000,000 $ $ 55,300,000 TOTAL Future Bond Projects $ $ $ 156,500,000 $ $ 148,500,000 $ S 305,000,000 Total Wastewater (Non -IQ) Projects (413) S $ $ - $ $ - $ $ 7,932,000 Total IQ Water Projects (413) $ - $ - $ - $ $ - $ $ - Total Wastewater (Non -IQ) Projects (414) $ 36,159,200 $ 58,895,000 $ 56,815,000 $ 71,420,000 $ 61,620,000 $ 67,770,000 $ 343,274,200 Total IQ Water Projects (414) 1 $ 600,000 $ 4,150,000 $ 4,150,000 $ 1,150,000 $ 1,150,000 $ 3,390,000 $ 11,926,000 TOTAL WASTEWATER AND IQ PROJECTS (413 & 414) $ 36,759,200 $ 63,045,000 $ 60,965,000 $ 72,570,000 $ 62,770,000 $ 71,160,000 $ 363,132,200 Total NE Bond Funded Projects (415) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 12,587,000 Total 2021 Series Bond Funded Projects (419) $ 50,190,833 $ $ - $ $ - $ $ 67,700,833 Total Commercial Paper Funded Projects (420) $ - $ $ 11,144,910 $ $ $ $ 11,144,910 Total Potential Future Bond/Loan $ $ $ 156,500,000 $ $ 148,500,000 1 $ $ 305,000,000 a a O 00 zh w n N Packet Pg. 698 9.A.3.c 2022 WASTEWATER 10-YEAR CIP PLAN UPDATE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS 2025-2029 WASTEWATER (NON -IQ) AND IRRIGATION QUALITY (IQ) WATER Line No. Project No. Project Name Im Summary FY 2023-2027 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 FY 2033 FY 2028-2032 Summary FY 2023-2032 Existing 414 Wastewater (Non -It) Projects 1 50105 Integrated Asset Management Program S 1,000,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 2,000,000 3 50110 Biosolids Reuse Facility S - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 4 50154 Hurricane Irma S $ $ $ $ $ $ 5 50196 Chiller NCWRF Ops Bldg $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 6 50199 COVID-19 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 7 50391 W W Hurricane Resiliency $ $ - $ $ $ $ - $ $ 8 60224 Lely Golf Estates $ 24,675,000 $ 6,000,000 $ 6,000,000 $ 6, 0,000 $ 6,000,000 $ 6,000,000 $ 30,000,000 $ 54,675,000 9 70014 Real Property/Infrastructure Audit $ 280,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 250,000 $ 530,000 10 1 70031 lUtilities Master Plan $ 500,000 $ 100,0qL $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 500,000 $ 1,000,000 11 70043 Gravity Sewers TSP CAP S - $ $ - S - $ $ $ - $ - 12 70044 Force Main Improvements Cap S S $ S $ $ 13 70046 Wastewater Pump Station TSP $ $ $ S $ S $ $ 14 70050 Master Pump Stations TSP Cap $ $ $ S $ S $ $ 15 70053 NCWRF Power System TSP $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 16 70055 SCWRF Power System Cap $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - 17 70060 NCWRF SCADA Support Operating TSP $ 1,55(,W$ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 3,050,000 18 70061 SCWRF SCADA Support Operating TSP $ 1,550,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 3,050,000 19 70103 NE Svs Area Interg $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 20 70117 WW Remote Sites MSP $ 880,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,880,000 21 70119 W W Treatment Plants MSP $ 1,600,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 3,600,000 22 70120 Naples Pk Basin Optimization $ 40,000,000 $ 8,000,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 8,000,000 $ 48,000,000 23 70121 Utility Billing Customer Sery Software $ 10,000 $ - $ $ $ $ $ - $ 10,000 24 70122 VB DR CDS Basin 101 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 25 70139 Basin 101 Program Capital $ $ 2,500,000 $ 3,500, 000 $ 3,500,000 $ 3,500,000 $ 3,500,000 $ 16,500,000 $ 16,500,000 a a Em Q 1Z 3 U) i R L R d O O O O O O O N O N J a- 00 00 61 I` N d Q a LL L O C 3 O U L d O U C t V <B Q Packet Pg. 699 9.A.3.c Line No. Project No. Project Name Summary FY 2023-2027 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 FY 2033 FY 2028-2032 Summary FY 2023-2032 26 70141 Basin 305 Program Capital (Pump Stations) $ 12,500,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 15,000,000 $ 27,500,000 27 70142 Basin 306 Program Capital $ 6,000,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 3,000,000 $ 9,000,000 28 70143 Gravity Transmission Systems TSP $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 29 1 70144 Force Main Transmission Systems TSP $ 1,200,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 2,700,000 30 70145 WW Pump Station TSP $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ $ - $ - $ 50.000 31 70146 Master PS TSP Op $ - $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - 32 70147 Collections Power System TSP $ - $ $ $ - $ - $ $ $ - 33 70148 Water Reclamation Facilities TSP $ 21,000,000 $ 8,000,000 $ 8,000,000 8,000,000 $ 8,000,000 $ 8,000,000 $ 40,000,000 $ 61,000,000 34 70149 NCWRF New Headworks $ 29,094,200 $ - $ $ - $ $ - $ - $ 29,094,200 35 70164 W W Collections SCADA Telemetry $ - $ $ $ $ $ $ - $ - 36 1 70167 lGovernment Operations Business Park $ - $ $ $ $ $ $ - $ - 37 70173 Orangetree Compliance $ 1,300,000 $ 3,000,0 $ $ $ $ $ 3,000,000 $ 4,300,000 38 70183 Pump Station 300.06 $ - $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - 39 70189 Cyber Security SCADA $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 40 70192 Palm River Bridge Pipe Replacement $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 41 70194 NE Utility Facilities $ $ $ $ $ $ - $ - 42 1 70202 lCounty Utility Standards $ 100,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 125,000 $ 225,000 43 70204 SCWRF IQ Storage Improvements $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 44 70207 MPS 301 Rehabilitation $ 750,000 $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ 750,000 45 70208 PS 302.07 Gravity Sewer $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 46 70213 MPS 300 Rehab $ Aw $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ 47 70214 MPS 107 Re -Configuration $ $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 5,000,000 48 1 70215 IMPS 302 Reconfiguration $ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 49 70217 MPS 309 Replacement (E Naples Middle School) $ 10,000,000 $ - $ $ $ $ $ $ 10,000,000 50 70222 Golden Gate City CAP $ 3,290,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 3,290,000 70229 1-75 / CR951 Utility $ - $ $ - 52 70230 MPS 308 Force Main $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 53 70233 Logan Blvd FM (hmnkl - VB) $ $ S $ $ $ $ $ - 54 70234 Eliminate NPDES $ 4,500,000 $ S $ $ $ $ $ 4,500,000 55 70237 MPS 306 $ - $ S $ $ $ $ $ - 56 70240 Collections Operating TSP $ 16,600,000 $ 3,500,000 $ 4,000,000 $ 4,000,000 $ 4,000,000 $ 4,000,000 $ 19,500,000 $ 36,100,000 57 70243 Golden Gate WWTP $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ 70244 IVBR Extension - Util $ $ $ 59 1 70245 JNCWRF DZMW I $ I $ - $ - $ - $ $ $ $ a a Packet Pg. 700 9.A.3.c Line No. Project No. Project Name Summary FY 2023-2027 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 FY 2033 FY 2028-2032 Summary FY 2023-2032 60 70247 US 41 N Utility Replacement $ - $ $ $ $ $ $ - $ 70249 MPS 313 Relocation $ 5,000,000 $ - $ 5,000,000 62 70250 Villagewalk WW Rehab $ - $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 63 1 70251 1 SCWRF Plant PS # 5 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 64 70254 PS 305.17 and FM $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 65 70255 GGWTP Forcemain $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 66 70256 I-75 Force Main Replacement $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 67 70257 Palm River PUR $ 22,000,000 $ $ 8,000,000 $ $ $ $ 8,000,000 $ 30,000,000 68 1 70259 IMPS 316 Force Main Relocation $ - $ $ - $ $ $ $ - $ - 69 70262 Golden Gate City PUR $ 500,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000 APE 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 15,000,000 $ 15,500,000 70 70270 SCWRF CL 2 Mods $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - 71 70272 ARV Replacement Program $ 7,150,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 000,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 15,000,000 $ 22,150,000 72 70273 Generator Replacement Program $ 2,600,000 $ 650,000 $ 650,000 $ 650,000 $ 650,000 $ 650,000 $ 3,250,000 $ 5,850,000 73 70279 WW DIW Mgmt & TSP $ - $ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 77 71058 General Legal Services $ 500,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 500,000 $ 1,000,000 78 72009 Western Interconnect $ 3,000,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,000,000 79 72013 Facility Infrastructure Maint Wastewater $ 1,150,000 $ ft 350,000 $ 350,000 $ 350,000 $ 350,000 $ 1,750,000 $ 2,900,000 80 1 72505 JWW Security Systems $ 1 0 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 4,250,000 81 72541 SCADA Compliance Assurance Program- Wastewater $ 115,000 $ 115,000 $ 115,000 $ 115,000 $ 115,000 $ 575,000 $ 1,130,000 82 73045 FDOT Utility Construction Projects - WW $ 2,000,000 OQ 000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 4,500,000 83 73065 CW Util Proj-WW $ 800,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,800,000 84 73922 WW Collection SCADA Telemetry $ 750,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,750,000 85 73944 Cast Svs Billing $ - $ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 86 73968 NCWRF Technical Support Program $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 87 73969 SCWRF Technical Support Program $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 88 74310 State Revolving Loan Funding $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - 89 75009 Grant Applications $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - 90 75017 PUD Hydraulic Modeling $ 500,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 500,000 $ 1,000,000 91 75018 Financial Services $ 150,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 150,000 $ 300,000 92 75019 GM Comprehensive Planning Technical Support $ 450,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 250,000 $ 700,000 93 1 33667 JHMGP PUD Gen H0419 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - a a 00 00 rn r- tV d a+ fC Q d LL CO L O C 3 O U L d O U C 0) E t V t'a a+ Q Packet Pg. 701 9.A.3.c Line No. Project No. Project Name Summary FY 2023-2027 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 FY 2033 FY 2028-2032 Summary FY 2023-2032 SCWRF New Headworks $ 52,000,000 $ S $ - $ 52,000,000 95 70278 NCWRF Switchgear #1 Replacement $ 6,000,000 $ $ $ $ $ 6,000,000 96 70274 MPS 310 Reconfiguration and Rehabilitation $ 2,500,000 $ $ $ $ $ 2,500,000 97 70284 MPS 103 Replacement $ 3,500,000 $ S $ $ $ 3,500,000 98 W WNEW lWastewater Valve Replacement - Multi Year Program $ 1,000,000 $ S S - S - S - $ $ 1,000,000 99 W WNEW lWastewater Electrical Upgrades - Multi year program $ 1,500,000 $ $ 1,500,000 TOTAL 414 WASTEWATER (NON -IQ) Projects $ 293,784,200 $ 47,170,000 $ 45,670,000 $ 36,170,000 $ 36,170,000 $ 36,170,000 $ 201,350,000 $ 495,134,200 $ 28,880,000 S 30,380,000 S 30.380,000 -44% -3% -26% 0% Existing 414 Irrigation Quality Water Projects 100 70056 IQ Power Systems S 240,000 $ 240,000 $ 240,000 $ 240,000 $ 240,000 $ 240,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 1,440,000 101 70062 IQ SCADA Support Operating S 1,900,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 3,900,000 102 70166 IQ Water System TSP S 3,300,000 $ 750,000 $ 750,000 $ ,000 $ 750,000 $ 750,000 $ 3,750,000 $ 7,050,000 103 74030 IQ Aquifer Storage and Recovery S - $ - $ $ - $ $ $ - $ - $ - $ New 414 Irrigation Quality Water Projects $ $ 104 W WNEW Pelican Bay New Storage Tank S $ 2,500,00 $ $ $ $ $ 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000 105 WWNEW JPelican Bay Facility S - $ - 1,5 00 $ $ $ $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 106 70234 IFoxfffe supplemental wells S 5,000,000 $ - $ $ - $ - $ - $ 5,000,000 S $ - TOTAL 414 IRRIGATION QUALITY WATER Projects $ 10,440,000 2,890,000 $ 1,390,000 $ 1,390,000 $ 1,390,000 $ 10,950,000 $ 21,390,000 e 3,890,000 2,890,000 $ 1,390,000 TOTAL FUND 414 Projects $ 304,224.200 S 51,060,000 $ 48,560,000 $ 37,560,000 $ 37,560,000 $ 37,560,000 $ 212,300,000 5; 516,524,200 $ 32 0,000 $ 33,270,000 $ 31,770,000 a a Packet Pg, 702 9.A.3.c Line No. Project No. Project Name Summary FY 2023-2027 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 FY 2033 FY 2028-2032 Summary FY 2023-2032 Existing 419 Bond Funded Projects Wastewater - Impact Fee 120 70194 Design updates to 10 mgd NECWTP. $ 5,626,190 $ - $ 5,626,190 121 70194 South Wellfield+Trans Mains Phase 1 $ 5,000,000 $ $ 5,000,000 122 70194 Construct deep injection well $ 12,500,000 $ $ 12,500,000 123 70194 Golden Gate City WWTP Expansion (4 mgd additional treatment capacity) Impact Fee 87.5% $ 4,500,000 $ $ 4,500,000 124 70243 Golden Gate City WWTP Expansion (4 mgd additional treatment capacity) Impact Fee 87.5% $ 5,000,000 $ $ 5,000,000 125 70243 Golden Gate City WWTP Expansion (4 mgd additional treatment capacity) Impact Fee 87.5% $ 140,000 $ $ 140,000 127 70194 Transmission Mains Phase 2A (southern portion) $ 5,000,000 $ $ 5,000,000 128 70194 CEI & CA - Transmission Mains Phase 2A (southern portion) $ 1,000,000 $ $ 1,000,000 129 70194 Transmission Mains Phase 2B (northern portion) $ 7,500,000 $ $ 7,500,000 130 70194 CEI & CA - Transmission Mains Phase 2B (northern portion) $ 1,500,000 $ $ 1,500,000 $ 47,766,190 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 47,766,190 131 70243 Golden Gate City WWTP Expansion (4 mgd additional treatment capacity) User Fee 12.5 % S 1,400.000 $ $ 1,400,000 $ 1,400,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 73,806,190 TOTAL FUND 419 Projects $ 7,026,190 $ $ $ $ $ $ 7,026,190 132 70194 Town of Big Cypress W W Reimbursement + 10% CEI (Impact Fee) $ 1,127,294 $ $ 1,127,294 133 70194 Belmar W W Reimbursement+ 10% CEI (Impact Fee) $ 095 $ $ 2,614,095 134 70194 Town of Big Cypress IQ Reimbursement + 10% CEI (User Fee) $ 5,09 , $ $ 5,095,390 135 70194 Belmar IQ Reimbursement+ 10% CEI (User Fee) $ 2,308,130 $ $ 21308,130 TOTAL Projects which will require Commercial Paper $ 11,144,910 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 11,144,910 Projects which will require Bond/Loan - User Fee 136 70243 Golden Gate City WWTP Expansion 4 mgd (2.5 mgd additional treatment capacity) - 62.5% Impact Fee $ 112,000,000 $ $ 112,000,000 137 70243 CEI - Golden Gate City WWTP Expansion 4 mgd (2.5 mgd additional treatment capacity) - 62.5% Impact Fee S 1,200,000 $ $ 1,200,000 138 70243 Construct Golden Gate City DIW S 15,000,000 $ $ 15,000,000 139 70194 Construct 4 mgd NECWRF + CEI & CA (0.75 mgd existing Orange Tree flow; 3.25 mgd additional treatment capacity) - 81.25 % Impact Fee $ 117,000,000 $ $ 117,000,000 a a 00 am h N d a+ fC Q a LL L O C 7 O U d O <.i C 1v E t V r Q Packet Pg. 703 9.A.3.c Line No. Project No. Project Name Summary FY 2023-2027 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 FY 2033 FY 2028-2032 Summary FY 2023-2032 140 70194 Const South Wellfield (5 wells) - 50% W, 50% W W - IQ $ 3,750,000 $ $ 3,750,000 141 70194 CEI RE&ICQA - Const South Wellfleld (5 wells) - 50% W, 50% $ 750,000 $ - $ 750,000 142 70194 Construct Common Area Facilities $ - $ 14,250,000 $ 14,250,000 $ 14,250,000 143 70194 CEI & CA - Construct Common Area Facilities $ $ 2,850,000 $ 2,850,000 $ 2,850,000 144 70167 Government Operations Business Park (R&R - NEW BOND - User Fee) $ $ $ 145 7XXXX Golden Gate City converting to sewer - need financing info. (Grant) S S $ TOTAL Projects which will require Bond/Loan - Impact Fee $ 249,700,000 $ 17,100,000 $ $ $ S S 17,100,000 $ 266,800,000 Projects which will require Bond/Loan - User Fee 146 70243 Golden Gate City W WTP Expansion 4 mgd (2.5 mgd additional treatment capacity) - 37.5% User Fee $ 28 000,000 $ - $ 28,000,000 147 70243 CEI - Golden Gate City W WTP Expansion 4 mgd (2.5 mgd additional treatment capacity) - 37.5% User Fee $ 300,000 $ $ 300,000 148 70194 Construct 4 mgd NECWRF + CEI & CA (0.75 mgd existing Orange Tree flow; 3.25 mgd additional treatment capacity) - 18.75 % User Fee $ 27,000,000 S $ 27,000,000 149 1 70194 lConstruct Common Area Facilities $ 750,000 150 1 70194 ICEI & CA - Construct Common Area Facilities $ 150,000 ill require Bond/Loan - User Fee S 55,300,000 $ 900,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ 55,300,000 TOTAL Future Bond Projects $ 305,000,000 $ 18,000,000 $ $ $ $ $ 18,000,000 $ 323,000,000 Total Wastewater (Non -IQ) Projects (413) $ 7,932,000 $ - $ $ $ $ $ - $ 7,932,000 Total IQ Water Projects (413) $ - $ - $ $ $ $ $ - $ - Total Wastewater (Non -IQ) Projects (414) $ 343,274,200 $ 47,170,000 $ 45,670,000 $ 36,170,000 $ 36,170,000 $ 36,170,000 $ 165,180,000 $ 508,454,200 Total IQ Water Projects (414) $ 11,926,000 $ 3,890,000 $ 2,890,000 $ 1,390,000 $ 1,390,000 $ 1,390,000 $ 9,560,000 $ 21,486,000 TOTAL WASTEWATER AND IQ PROJECTS (413 & 414) $ 363,132,200 $ 51,060,000 $ 48,560,000 $ 37,560,000 $ 37,560,000 $ 37,560,000 $ 174,740,000 $ 537,872,200 Total NE Bond Funded Projects (415) $ 12,587,000 $ _ $ _ $ _ $ _ $ $ - $ 12,587,000 Total 2021 Series Bond Funded Projects (419) $ 67,700,833 $ _ $ $ g $ $ $ 51,676,190 Total Commercial Paper Funded Projects (420) $ 11,144,910 $ - $ 11144910 Total Potential Future Bond/Loan User Fee $ 305,000,000 $ 18,000,000 $ $ $ $ $ 18,000,000 $ 323:000:000 a a 00 00 to r- N d a+ tC SZ d LL N L O a+ C 3 O U L t1i O U c E t v to Q Packet Pg. 704 9.A.3.c Immokalee Water and Sewer District IN m Packet Pg. 705 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN The IWSD's current 5-year Capital Improvement Plan (FY2023-FY2027) is listed below: Immokalee Water and Sewer District Projection of tpt tProjects Wednesday, August 31, 2022 Projected Fiscal Year Ending September 30, Recognized Liu, No. Description Project I➢ Funding Dept. 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Total Source l Water Softening for Immokalee - Design Engineering W-01 USDA-B2 10 $470,000 $470,0( 2 Water Softening for Immokalee - Construction W-01 USDA-132 10 4,700,000 4,700,00, 3 Water Softening for Immokalee - Construction Engineering W-01 USDA-B2 10 300,000 300,00, 4 Fuel Storage Tank at Airport WTP - Design Engineering W-02 Revenue Fund 10 5,000 5,00, 5 Fuel Storage Tank at Airport WTP - Construction W-02 Revenue Fund 10 80,000 80,00, 6 Fuel Storage Tank at Airport WTP - Construction Engineering W-02 Revenue Fund 10 5,000 5,00, 7 Legacy Lots & Water Main Looping - Design Engineering W-03 Revenue Fund 60 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 300,00, 8 Legacy Lots & Water Main Looping - Construction W-03 Revenue Fund 60 637,500 637,500 637,500 637,500 2,550,00, 9 Legacy Lots & Water Main Looping - Construction Engineering W-03 Revenue Fund 60 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 360,00, 10 IFAS Tank & Booster Station - Design Engineering W-04 Grant 60 80,000 80,00, 11 IFAS Tank & Booster Station - Construction W-04 Grant 2,000,000 2,000,00, 12 IFAS Tank & Booster Station - Construction Engineering W-04 Grant 120,000 120,00, 13 New 2.5 MOO Reverse Osmosis WTP - Design Engineering W-05 USDA-B3 10 400,000 400,000 800,00, 14 New 2.5 MOD Reverse Osmosis WTP - Construction W-05 USD 10 10,000,000 10,000,00� 15 New 2.5 MGD Reverse Osmosis WTP - Construction Engineering W-05 U 3 10 600,000 600,00� 16 Water Distribution System AMI- Design Engineering W-06 Grant 64 - - - 17 Water Distribution System AMI-Construction W-06 Grant 60 2,000,000 2,000,000 4,000,00, 18 Water Distribution System AMI - Construction Engineering W-06 Gant 60 - - - 19 South 9th WTP Fence Addition W-07 Revenue Fund 10 15,000 15,00, 20 South 9th WTP Shed W-08 Revenue Funq 10 19,000 19,00, 21 Hypo Tank Scale W-09 Rcvenue Fund 40,000 40,00, 22 New Maintenance Building GP-01 Revenue 0 830,000 830,00 23 Fuel Storage Tanks at TV W & W WTP GP-02 Rcvenue Fun 10 110,000 110,00 24 Utility Relocation for SR29 Widening from CR846 to Agriculture Way GP-03 FDOT 60 25,000 25,000 840,000 890,00, 25 Utilities for SR29 By -Pass from CR846 to north arket Road GP-04 FOOT 60 90,000 2,165,000 2,255,00 26 District Wide Water and Sewer Expansion 2e GP-05 Revenue Fund 60 50,000 50,00 27 Master Plan Update GP-06 Revenue Fund 10 & 60 150,000 150,00 28 New Administration Building (Land Acquisition) OMEN07 Bank Note 40 1,132,500 1,132,50, 29 New Administration Building (Study) GP-07 Revenue Fund 40 35,000 35,00, 30 NEW SCADA SYSTEM GP-08 Revenue Fund 10 120,000 400,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,120,00, Capital Outlav 31 Allowance for Capital Ou y - Water Treament & Dis ion TBD Revenue Fund 10 & 60 305,000 305,000 305,000 305,000 305,000 1,525,00, 32 Assumed Additional Average Ca Outl TBD Revenue Fund - - - - - - 33 Maray Assumed Additional Average a TBD Revenue Fund - - - - - - 34 TOTAL WATER PLANT COSTS 2,500 59,596,500 53,587,500 54,797,500 512,307,500 534,5 VASTEWATER PLANT 35 Rehab Three Existing Clarifiers - Design Engineering W W-01 Revenue Fund 20 $0 36 Rehab Three Existing Clarifiers - Construction W W-01 USDA-Bl 20 - - 37 Rehab Three Existing Clarifiers - Construction W W-01 USDA -GI 20 382,500 382,50, 38 Rehab Three Existing Clarifiers - Construction W W-01 Revenue Fund 20 100,000 100,00, 39 Rehab Three Existing Clarifiers - Construction Enginering W W-01 Revenue Fund 20 - - 40 Line 8" & 18" Clay Pipe Sewers - Design Engineering W W-02 Revenue Fund 30 42,500 42,500 85,00, 41 Line 8" & 18" Clay Pipe Sewers - Construction W W-02 Revenue Fund 30 750,000 650,000 100,000 1,500,00, 42 Line 8" & 18" Clay Pipe Sewers - Construction Engineering W W-02 Revenue Fund 30 35,100 35,100 70,20, 43 Lift Station P&O Upgrades and 10" FM Extension - Design Engineering W W-03 Revenue Fund 30 65,200 65,20 44 Lift Station P&O Upgrades and 10" FM Extension - Construction W W-03 Revenue Fund 30 496,000 496,00, 45 Lift Station P&O Upgrades and 10" FM Extension - Construction Engineerinl W W-03 Revenue Fund 30 34,400 34,40, 46 6" Plug Valve Replacement at Arrowhead - Design Engineering W W-04 Revenue Fund 30 5,000 5,00, 47 6" Plug Valve Replacement at Arrowhead - Construction W W-04 Revenue Fund 30 24,000 24,00, 48 6" Plug Valve Replacement at Arrowhead - Construction Engineering W W-04 Revenue Fund 30 5,000 5,00, 49 Line Key Manholes Throughout System - Design Engineering W W-05 Revenue Fund 30 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 25,00, 50 Line Key Manholes Throughout System - Construction W W-05 Revenue Fund 30 206,200 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 606,20, 51 Line Key Manholes Throughout System - Construction Engineering W W-05 Revenue Fund 30 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 25,00, 52 Lake Trafford Road/Carson Road Area Lift Stations & Force Main V✓B'-07 Revenue Fund 30 - - Improvements - Design Engineering Modeling 53 Lake Trafford Road/Carson Road Area Lift Stations & Force Main WW-07 Cost Share 30 100,000 100,00i Improvements -Design Engineering 54 Lake Trafford Road/Carson Road Area Lift Stations & Force Main WW-07 Revenue Fund 30 500,000 500,00, Improvements - Construction Lake Trafford Road/Carson Road Area Lift Stations & Force Main WW-07 Cost Share 30 500,000 500,000 Improvements - Construction STRATEGIC REPORT AND DEVELOPMENT FOR IMMOKALEE WATER AND SE Packet Pg. 706 9.A.3.c CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN . 1 Immokalee Water and Projection tCapital Improvement Projects Wednesday, August 31, 2022 Projected I7scal Year Ending September 30, Recognized Line No. Description Project ID Funding Dept. 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Total Source 56 Lake Trafford Road/Carson Road Area Lift Stations & Force Main WW-07 Revenue Fund 30 85,000 85,00 Improvements - Construction Engineering 57 Lake Trafford Road/Carson Road Area Lift Stations & Force Main W W-07 Cost Share 30 85,000 85,00 Improvements - Construction Engineering 58 Oxidation Ditch Bridges (2 Bridges - Ditch #3) - Design Engineering W W-08 Revenue Fund 20 8,000 8,00 59 Oxidation Ditch Bridges (2 Bridges - Ditch #3) - Construction W W-08 Revenue Fund 20 145,000 145,00 60 Oxidation Ditch Bridges (2 Bridges - Ditch #3) - Construction Engineering W W-08 Revenue Fund 20 10,000 10,00 61 Deep Injection Well #2 - Design Engineering W W-09 Grant 20 250,000 250,00 62 Deep Injection Well #2 - Design Engineering W W-09 Grant 20 46,040 46,04 63 Deep Injection Well #2 - Construction W W-09 Grant 20 14,640,000 14,640,00 64 Deep Injection Well #2 - Construction Engineering W W-09 Grant 20 850,000 850,00 65 Agricultural Public Acces Re -Use Water System - Design Engineering W W-10 Grant 20 100,000 100,00 66 Agricultural Public Acces Re -Use Water System - Construction W W-10 Grant 20 00,000 1,500,000 3,000,00 67 Agricultural Public Acces Re -Use Water System - Construction Engineering W W-10 Grunt 20 80,000 80,000 160,00 68 Unsewered Areas/Septic Tank Replacement Program - Design Engineering W W-11 Grant 3 - 69 Unsewered Areas/Septic Tank Replacement Program - Design Engineering W W-11 Grant 150,000 150,000 150,000 450,00 70 Unsewered Areas/Septic Tank Replacement Program - Design Engineering W W-11 Grant 0 150,000 150,000 300,00 71 Unsewered Areas/Septic Tank Replacement Program - Construction W W-I I Grant , 30 - 72 Unsewered Areas/Septic Tank Replacement Program - Construction W -11 W Grant 30 1,50 , 1,500,000 3,000,00 73 Unsewered Areas/Septic Tank Replacement Program -Construction W W-11 Grant 0 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 4,500,00 74 Unsewered Areas/Septic Tank Replacement Program - Construction Engineer W W -I I Grant - 75 Unsewered Areas/Septic Tank Replacement Program - Construction Engineer W -11 W0'o Grant 150,000 150,000 300,00 76 Unsewered Areas/Septic Tank Replacement Program - Construction Engineer W W-11 Grant 30 150,000 150,000 150,000 450,00 77 Wastewater Collection System AMI - Design Engineering W W-12 Grant 30 - 78 Wastewater Collection System AMI - Construction W\i� Grant 0 2,500,000 2,500,000 5,000,00 79 Wastewater Collection System AMI - Construction Engineering W W-12 Grant - 80 No. 4 Clarifier Catwalk - Design Engineering W W-13 Revenue Fun 20 112,000 112,00 81 No. 4 Clarifier Catwalk - Construction W W- l3 Revenue Fun 20 400,000 400,00 82 No. 4 Clarifier Catwalk - Construction Engineering WW- 13 Revenue Fund 20 56,000 56,00 83 Bleach Secondary Containment - Design EngineeCin W W-14 Revenue Fund 20 12,200 12,20 84 Bleach Secondary Containment - Construction W W-14 Revenue Fund 20 40,000 40,00 85 Bleach Secondary Containment -Construction E vRevenue Fund 20 5,000 5,00 86 Weight Scales - Design Engineering T5 Revenue Fund 20 - - 87 Weight Scales - Construction W W-15 Revenue Fund 20 60,000 60,00 88 Weight Scales - Construction Er ' 0%k W W-15 Revenue Fund 20 2,000 2,00 89 Oxidation Ditch Fences (1, 2,A W W-16 Revenue Fund 20 50,000 50,00 90 Bypass Pump System for rations InW W-17 Revenue Fund 30 272,000 272,00 91 W WTP Carport Bays (3) W W_18 Revenue Fund 20 28,500 28,50 9' Bioset UpgradesNk WW-19 Revenue Fund 20 500,000 500,00 93 New Maintenance Building GP-01 Revenue Fund 50 830,000 830,00 94 Fuel Storage Tanks at JV W & W W I P GP-02 Revenue Fund 20 110,000 110,00 95 Utility Relocation for SR29 Widening from 6 to Agriculture Way GP-03 FDOT 30 25,000 25,000 840,000 890,00 96 Utilities for SR29 By -Pass from CR846 to north of New Market Road GP-04 FDOT 30 90,000 2,165,000 2,255,00 97 District Wide Water and Sewer Expansion GP-05 Revenue Fund 30 50,000 50,00 98 Master Plan Update GP-06 Revenue Fund 20 & 30 150,000 150,00 99 New Administration Building (Land Acquisition) GP-07 Bank Note 40 1,132,500 1,132,50 100 New Administration Building (Study) GP-07 Revenue Fund 40 35,000 35,00 101 NEW SCADA SYSTEM GP-08 Revenue Fund 20 & 30 120,000 400,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,120,00 Capital Outlay 102 Allowance for Capital Outlay - Wastewater Treament TBD Revenue Fund 20 391,000 391,000 391,000 391,000 391,000 1,955,00 103 Allowance for Capital Outlay - Wastewater Collection TBD Revenue Fund 30 244,000 244,000 244,000 244,000 244,000 1,220,00 104 Assumed Additional Average Capital Outlay TBD Revenue Fund - - - - - - 105 Assumed Additional Average Maintenance TBD Revenue Fund - - - - - - 106 TOTAL. WASTEWATER PLANT COSTS S10,588,000 S9,465,700 S6,968,000 S3,681,040 $18,485,000 $49,187,7, 107 TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROb'EMENT PROJECTS $14,840,500 $19,062,200 $10,555,500 $8,478,540 $30,792,500 $83,729,2, r Q STRATEGIC REPORT AND DEVELOPMENT FOR IMMOKALEE WATER AND SE Packet Pg. 707 9.A.3.c Port of the Islands Community Improvement District M Packet Pg. 708 9.A.3.c TABLE NO. 8 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN UTILITY COMPONENT (NOTE: Projects are not listed in priority) PROJECT NO. DESCRIPTION YEAR BUDGET 1 Water Storage Tank Addition 1-5 $425,000 2 Water Storage Tank Repair 1-5 $75,000 3 Wastewater Filter Evaluation 1-5 $10,000 4 Fire Hydrant Removal — North Hotel 1-5 $2,500 5 Plant Facility Gate Replacement 1-5 $10,000 6 Wastewater Filter Replacement/Modification 1-5 $150,000 7 Wastewater Collection System Evaluation 1-5 $27,500 8 Wastewater Pump Station Evaluation 1-5 $10,000 9 Water System Isolation Valve Replacement Pha 1-5 $150,000 10 Fire/Irrigation System Isolation Valve Repla e Phase 1 1-5 $100,000 11 Wastewater Pump Station Rehabilitation $150,000 12 Wastewater Plant Aeration Piping Replacement 1-5 $65,000 13 Wastewater Plant Bar Screen Replacement 1-5 $80,000 14 Wastewater Transmission System Isolation Valve Replacement Phase 1 a 1-5 $6,000 15 Wellfield AC Transmission Main Replacement 5-10 $1,210,000 16 Well Reconditioning/Pump Replacement Wells 1-3 5-10 $150,000 17 Wellfield Emergency Generator Replacement 5-10 $70,000 18 Wastewater Collection System Rehabilitation 5-10 $10,000 19 Plant Facility Existing Building Evaluation 5-10 $20,000 20 Wastewater MBR Equipment Removal 5-10 $50,000 21 Fire/Irrigation High Service Pump Replacement 5-10 $60,000 22 Union Road AC Water Main Replacement 5-10 $490,000 23 Orchid Cove Water Main Interconnect 5-10 $20,000 24 Orchid Cove Fire/Irrigation Main Interconnect 5-10 $35,000 25 Plant Facility Existing Building Demolition/Renovation 5-10 $350,000 26 Water System Isolation Valve Replacement Phase 2 5-10 $150,000 27 Wastewater Transmission System Isolation Valve Replace ent Phase 2 5-10 $6,000 28 Fire/Irrigation System Isolation Valve Replacement Phase 2 5-10 $100,000 29 Water System High Service Pump Replacement 10-20 $120,000 30 1 Water RO Membrane Replacement 1 10-20 1 $6000 31 1 Well Reconditioning/Pump Replacement Wells 1-3 10-20 1 $150,000 Packet Pg. 709 9.A.3.c TABLE NO. 9 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN UTILITY COMPONENT FIVE YEAR PROJECTS (NOTE: Projects are not listed by priority) PROJECT NO. DESCRIPTION YEAR BUDGET 1 Water Storage Tank Addition 1-5 $425,000 2 Water Storage Tank Repair 1-5 $75,000 3 Wastewater Filter Evaluation 1 $10,000 4 Fire Hydrant Removal — North Hotel 1 $2,500 5 Plant Facility Gate Replacement 1 $10,000 Subtotal $522,500 6 Wastewater Filter Replacement/Modification A 2 $150,000 7 Wastewater Collection System Evaluation 2 $27,500 8 Wastewater Pump Station Evaluation 2 $10,000 9 Water System Isolation Valve Replacement Phase 1 2 $150,000 Subtotal $337,500 10 Fire/Irrigation System Isolation Valve Replacement Phase 1 3 $100,000 11 Wastewater Pump Station Rehabilitation 3 $150,000 12 Wastewater Plant Aeration Piping Replacement 3 $65,000 w Subtotal $315,000 13 Wastewater Plant Bar Screen Replacement 4 $80,000 14 Wastewater Transmission Osolation Valve Replace ent Phase 1 4 $6,000 15 Wellfield AC Transmission Main Replacement 4-6 $1,210,000 Subtotal $1,296,000 Packet Pg. 710 9.A.3.c TABLE NO. 10 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN ROADWAY & DRAINAGE COMPONENT (NOTE: Projects are not listed by priority) PROJECT NO. DESCRIPTION YEAR BUDGET 1 Stella Maris North Pavement Current $150,000 2 Newport Drive Drainage 1-5 $165,000 3 Morning Star Cay Drainage 1-5 $70,000 4 Cays Drainage (Wilderness, Windward, Venus Cay & Sunset Ca 1-5 $400,000 5 Union Road Pavement Upgrade 1-5 TBD 6 Newport Drive Pavement Rehabilitation 5-10 $235,000 Reserve Funds - Annually Drainage AC $65,000 Roadways $50,000 Packet Pg. 711 9.A.4.a PL20200002204 CO�eY CClrmplty STAFF REPORT COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT, ZONING DIVISION, COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING SECTION HEARING DATE: MARCH 7, 2024 SUBJECT: PL20200002204 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT GMPA; EMMANUAL LUTHERAN CHURCH COMMUNITY FACILITIES AND SERVICES SUBDISTRICT [FKA MISSION SUBDISTRICT] (ADOPTION HEARING) COMPANION TO: PL20200002198 EMMANUAL LUTHERAN CHUCH COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMUNITY FACILITIES PUD (CFPUD) [FKA EMMANUAL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH OF NAPLES, INC. CFPUD] ELEMENTS: FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT (FLUE) AGENT/APPLICANT: Agents: Bob Mulhere, FAICP Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire Hole Montes, a Bowman Company Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. 950 Encore Way 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 Naples, FL 34110 Naples, FL 34103 Owner: Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples, Inc. 777 Mooring Line Drive Naples, FL 34102 GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The existing Mission Subdistrict (Subdistrict) comprises 21.72f acres with a proposed expansion area of 14.2f acres, for a total of 35.92f acres. The Subdistrict is located on the south side of Oil Well Road, approximately 2,500 feet west of Orange Blossom Ranch and 1,000 feet west of Everglades Boulevard. The subject site is within the Rural Estates Planning Community in Section 19, Township 48 South, Range 28 East. Packet Pg. 712 9.A.4.a ❑yy Ii a� 0 E — J J Oil well RD l� PROJECT � LOCATION L a� 7 Randall BLVD w ❑ J m G N ev Location Map .I - IT 117 SITE 11s LOCATION 66 79 Q 95 -- —oil WeH RD — - 077KA 112 113 A &SA ..88A 8,A 7K�, V.' GFPUD EMMANUEL EUANCELICAL EUMPRAN CHURCH 119 57 72 73 86 n W5 12 tp 0 12 E $8 71 74 87 BQ 1 3D6 12 59 70 76 @6 B1 7 12 i Petition Number: PL20200002204 Zoning Map E E W a a c� O N N O O O O N O N J a O LO 00 ti N 0 Q d M 0 N N O O O O N O N J a E U f4 a Packet Pg. 713 9.A.4.a PL20200002204 REOUESTED ACTION: The applicant proposes a small-scale Comprehensive Plan (a/k/a Growth Management Plan) amendment to amend the Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) to change the name of the Mission Subdistrict to Emmanuel Lutheran Church Community Facilities and Services Subdistrict and amend the Subdistrict text. The proposed GMP Amendment is attached as Exhibit "A." PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The petition proposes to amend the existing Subdistrict as follows: • Increase the Subdistrict to 35.92 acres by incorporating 14.2 acres of Residential Estates Subdistrict designated property into the existing Subdistrict. • Amend the list of allowed uses within the Subdistrict. • Incorporate additional uses into the Subdistrict. • Increase the maximum number of single-family residences allowed as an alternative to non- residential uses in the CFPUD, based upon the increase in acreage. • Allow agricultural uses on the property until principal uses are constructed. Specific changes to the uses include: • Elimination of the existing requirement that Child Care Services, Private and Public Schools, and Medical Outreach Use be non-profit and affiliated with a church. • Elimination of a requirement for church affiliation for Individual and Family Social Services. • Addition of the following uses: o Non-profit Colleges and Universities. o Expanding the Medical Outreach Use to include Medical Office/Health Clinic uses. o Non-profit job Training and Rehabilitation Services. o Non-profit Physical Fitness Facilities affiliated with a church. o Essential Services. o United States Post Office. o Interim Agricultural Activities. o Food Trucks, maximum of four. o Garden Plots. o Recreational Facilities. The existing Subdistrict retains the underlying single-family dwellings associated with the Residential Estates Subdistrict if non-residential uses are not built. The amendment continues the allowance for residential use, a maximum of one dwelling unit per 2.25 acres if the Subdistrict does not develop the non- residential uses. The maximum allowable gross floor area in the district is proposed to remain at the existing 90,000 square feet of development. The existing 21.72-acre Subdistrict is zoned Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples, Inc. Community Facilities Planned Unit Development (CFPUD), and a companion petition (PL20200002198) proposes to amend the existing CFPUD to rezone the additional Estates (E) parcels, consistent with the GMPA Subdistrict boundaries and uses. Packet Pg. 714 9.A.4.a PL20200002204 Subject Property: The 21.72-acre existing Mission Subdistrict is currently approved on nine contiguous properties, with the Subdistrict text stating that "The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide for churches and related uses, including community outreach." A history of the development of the Subdistrict over the past 14 years is provided below: • 2012 - A Site Improvement Plan was approved by PL20120002169 for a Community Garden. • 2015 - A Planned Unit Development Insubstantial Change (PUDI) was approved by the Collier County Hearing Examiner to add temporary sports, religious, and community events, and temporary, seasonal sales as permitted accessory uses to allow the permitted athletic field as an interim accessory use prior to construction of a permitted principal use. • 2015 — Site Development Plan for Recreation Fields/Special Events (PL20150000268). • 2017 — Excavation Permit to reconfigure an existing lake (PL20170000507). • 2017 — Irrigation System (PRPL20171038225). • 2018 — Six-foot Wall (PRBD20180638952) for the athletic field. • 2019 — 2020 — Three Temporary Use Permits issued for Farmer's Market. • 2020 - Site Development Plan for a Shade Structure (PL20200002369). • 2020 — GMPA and PUDA submitted. Meals of Hope currently operates a mobile food pantry on the site, providing food every Wednesday from 12:30 to 4:00. Outdoor church services occur on -site on Sundays. Five of the six additional properties proposed to be incorporated into the Subdistrict are currently vacant, except for one parcel that includes a single-family home at the western boundary of the Subdistrict, south of the recreation field. SurroundingLands: ands: North: (across Oil Well Road) Future Land Use Designation; Rural Golden Gate Estates Urban Residential Subdistrict. Zoned; Estates. Land Use: Residential and vacant. East: Future Land Use Designation; Rural Golden Gate Estates Urban Residential Subdistrict. Zoned; Estates. Land Use: Residential and vacant. South: Future Land Use Designation; Rural Golden Gate Estates Urban Residential Subdistrict. Zoned; Estates. Land Use: Residential and vacant. West: Future Land Use Designation; Rural Golden Gate Estates Urban Residential Subdistrict. Zoned; Estates. Land Use: Residential and vacant. In summary, the surrounding area's existing and planned land uses are rural residential uses and undeveloped Estates (E) lots. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS: Backfzround and Considerations: The existing Mission Subdistrict is primarily a church development with ancillary community services uses to provide social services and education to the rural population in the area. The existing principal uses include churches, child-care services, private schools, essential services, job training and vocational rehabilitation, social services, and medical outreach. Packet Pg. 715 9.A.4.a PL20200002204 The proposed amendment adds principal and accessory uses, a majority of which appear to meet the original intent of the Subdistrict to provide community services and can be supported by staff, including the following principal uses: • Churches and Places of Worship. • Child Care Services. • Public and Private Schools. • Colleges and Universities. • Social Services. • Job Training and Vocational Rehabilitation. • Medical Outreach, which includes administering vaccines and blood donation drives. • Non -Profit Physical Fitness Facilities (such as a YMCA). • Essential Services. • United States Postal Center (except major distribution). Regarding Medical/Health Clinics and Food Trucks, the supplemental narrative provided by the Agent justified the food trucks by stating, "The proposed food trucks will complement the vision of the Subdistrict of establishing a sense of community and providing a public space for community engagement." The justification also stated that "The ability to host food trucks, whether to serve users of the fields and playground, congregants before or after worship, or the community in conjunction with Meals of Hope or Harry Chapin meets a tremendous need of the community. Food trucks further reduce rather than increase traffic, increase the quality of life and optimize the flexibility of the site, providing service only when needed rather than a permanent fixed investment with high sunk [sic] costs." The justification for the Medical/Health Clinic use was to "provide additional social, family and medical services to those within the Rural Estates on a shared site already permitted for church and similar uses." Compatibility: FLUE Policy 5.6 requires new land uses to be compatible with, and complimentary to, surrounding land uses. Compatibility includes land use density/intensity; development standards such as setbacks, building height, and landscape buffers; building mass, location, and orientation; architecture; and open space. The area surrounding the existing Subdistrict is primarily rural residential with existing built and vacant Estates (E) lots; however, as shown on the map below, the location is between the urban -style residential development at Orangetree and Orange Blossom Ranch and the commercial activities at Immokalee Road to the west, and the SRAs to the east. Packet Pg. 716 9.A.4.a PL20200002204 *SUBJECTPROPERTY P APPFSovED sRn co.1r.9ERIC4,1_ V PENDING COMMERCIAL V APPROVED PUD COMMERICAL The CFPUD Master Plan provides the 75-foot buffer required by the GGAMP that is intended to protect rural residential uses adjacent to non-residential uses. The existing CFPUD includes the requirement for the 75-foot buffers, and the amendment will add the requirement to the proposed Subdistrict language. The existing Subdistrict on 21.72 acres was intended for churches and related uses, including community outreach. A campus -style development with churches, childcare centers, social services, and medical outreach was found to be compatible with the surroundings. The intensity of the project was capped at a maximum of 90,000 square feet of development. The proposed amendments to the Subdistrict, though still capped at 90,000 square feet, change the character of the project due to the expanded uses that include commercial activities, the removal of not -for -profit, and the expansion to over 35 acres located midblock in the Rural Estates. The scale, proposed uses, and expansion of the Subdistrict project may be less compatible with the Rural Estates than the original project. Institutional and Commercial Needs Anal The Collier County Planning Commission recently discussed the commercial square footage in the northern area of the County based on allowances in the GMP. The staff has determined that the GMP currently allows over four million square feet of commercial uses within the area from Immokalee Road/Randall Curve to the SRAs to the east. The CCPC has stated that a determination of need is a critical component of a GMPA. The petition did include information to support the proposed amendment, including: There was a 10-20% increase in traffic on Oil Well Road from 2020 based upon the 2021 AUIR, and it is, therefore, an appropriate location for a community church campus. Except for two public schools, no such services (not -for -profit medical office, essential services, U.S. Post Office, social services, and colleges and universities) exist within f6 miles. They note that these services may be found in Immokalee (f 17 miles) or Golden Gate City (f 16 miles). No data and analysis were provided to demonstrate that the uses are needed in this area. In addition to the currently approved commercial square footage exceeding four million square feet in this vicinity, there are two GMPA and companion PUD petitions pending in the area, including the GMA Commercial Subdistrict (C-3 uses and Self -Storage) and the Oil Well Everglades Neighborhood Center (proposes a gasoline service station, convenience store, and fast food with drive -through). The proposed Neighborhood Center is located on the north side of Oil Well Road at the intersection of Everglades Packet Pg. 717 9.A.4.a PL20200002204 Boulevard, almost immediately across the street from the eastern edge of the subject Subdistrict. The proposed petitions are indicated in red on the map above. Public Infrastructure Staff review regarding provision of privately -owned well and septic rather than public water and sewer included comments that "The legislative intent of the Collier County Water -Sewer District Act (Ch. 2003- 353, Laws of Florida) indicates, "the proliferation of such [privately -owned] package sewage treatment plants and use of septic tanks poses a significant risk of contamination of water supply sources." The nearest existing public water and sewer facilities are located on Oil Well Road, 1,350 feet east of Tangelo Drive (approximately 3,500 feet east of the Subdistrict), and an 8" force main at the southeast corner of that intersection. Based on the analysis above, including a lack of demonstrated need and an existing sufficient supply of commercial square footage available in the northern Collier County area, Comprehensive Planning Staff does not support the incorporation of commercial uses of Medical/Health Clinics and Food Trucks, into the Community Facilities Subdistrict and CFPUD. These commercial uses are proposed as principal uses within the Subdistrict which would allow the development of these commercial uses before construction or operation of any of the proposed community facilities allowed on the site. Staff finds that compatibility is an issue, particularly with commercial uses and the scale of the expanded area of the Subdistrict. However, the requested addition of other principal uses into the Subdistrict, such as colleges and universities or public schools, may be consistent with the existing Subdistrict intent, which was found compatible with the surrounding area. Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental review staff has found this project to be consistent with the Conservation & Coastal Management Element (CCME). The proposed changes do not affect any of the environmental requirements of the GMP. Transportation Element: In evaluating this project, staff reviewed the applicant's February 20, 2023, Transportation Impact Statement (TIS) for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) using the 2022 Annual Update and Inventory Reports (AUIR). Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP states; "The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity ofpermissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and C. For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Packet Pg. 718 9.A.4.a PL20200002204 Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses theproject's significant impacts on all roadways. " Transportation Planning staff has evaluated the TIS submitted with the proposed petition and has found that the proposed Emmanuel Church Amendment will add an estimated +/- 132 PM peak hour two-way new trips on the adjacent roadway network. The current PUD generates an estimated +/- 323 PM peak hour two- way trips, resulting in a new total estimate of +/- 455 PM peak hour two-way trips for this PUD. The additional trips will impact the following roadway network links: Link Roadway Link 2021 2022 PM P.M. Peak 2021 2022 # Location AUIR AUIR Peak Hour Peak AUIR AUIR LOS LOS Hr. Direction Remaining Remaining Peak Service Capacity Capacity Dir Volume/Peak Project Direction Vol. 119.0 Oil Well Immokalee D D 23/WB 2,200East 402 502 Road Rd to Project 119.0 Oil Well Project to D D 43/EB 2,200East 402 502 Road Everglades Staff notes that the roadway network has sufficient capacity to accommodate the proposed Emmanuel Church PUD Amendment. Therefore, the proposed development is consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan within the 5-year planning period, and the Transportation Planning staff recommends approval of the request. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. The roadway infrastructure is sufficient to serve the proposed project, as noted in the Transportation Element consistency review. Operational impacts will be addressed at the time of the first development order (SDP or Plat), at which time a new TIS will be required to demonstrate turning movements for all site access points. Finally, the project's development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals, including but not limited to any plats and or site development plans, are sought. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. The roadway infrastructure has sufficient capacity to serve the proposed PUD Amendment. Utility Review: The subject property is within the Collier County Water Sewer District (CCWSD), though not the current water, wastewater, and irrigation quality (I.Q.) water service areas. Connection of the property to CCWSD facilities shall be made in accordance with the Interim Facilities/System Agreement for Potable Water Facilities and Wastewater Facilities with Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples, Inc., a Florida corporation. Packet Pg. 719 9.A.4.a PL20200002204 CRITERIA FOR GMP AMENDMENTS FLORIDA STATUTES: Data and analysis requirements for comprehensive plans and plan amendments are noted in Chapter 163, F.S., specifically as listed below. Section 163.3177(1)(f), Florida Statutes: (1) All mandatory and optional elements of the comprehensive plan and plan amendments shall be based upon relevant and appropriate data and an analysis by the local government that may include, but not be limited to, surveys, studies, community goals and vision, and other data available at the time of adoption of the comprehensive plan or plan amendment. To be based on data means to react to it in an appropriate way and to the extent necessary indicated by the data available on that particular subject at the time of adoption of the plan or plan amendment at issue. 1. Surveys, studies, and data utilized in the preparation of the comprehensive plan may not be deemed a part of the comprehensive plan unless adopted as a part of it. Copies of such studies, surveys, data, and supporting documents for proposed plans and plan amendments shall be made available for public inspection, and copies of such plans shall be made available to the public upon payment of reasonable charges for reproduction. Support data or summaries are not subject to the compliance review process, but the comprehensive plan must be clearly based on appropriate data. Support data or summaries may be used to aid in the determination of compliance and consistency. 2. Data must be taken from professionally accepted sources. The application of a methodology utilized in data collection or whether a particular methodology is professionally accepted may be evaluated. However, the evaluation may not include whether one accepted methodology is better than another. Original data collection by local governments is not required. However, local governments may use original data so long as methodologies are professionally accepted. 3. The comprehensive plan shall be based upon permanent and seasonal population estimates and projections, which shall either be those published by the Office of Economic and Demographic Research or generated by the local government based upon a professionally acceptable methodology. The plan must be based on at least the minimum amount of land required to accommodate the medium projections as published by the Office of Economic and Demographic Research for at least a 10-year planning period unless otherwise limited under s. 380.05, including related rules of the Administration Commission. Absent physical limitations on population growth, population projections for each municipality and the unincorporated area within a county must, at a minimum, be reflective of each area's proportional share of the total county population and the total county population growth. Section 163.3177(6)(a)2. Florida Statutes: 2. The future land use plan and plan amendments shall be based upon surveys, studies, and data regarding the area, as applicable, including: a. The amount of land required to accommodate anticipated growth. b. The projected permanent and seasonal population of the area. c. The character of undeveloped land. d. The availability of water supplies, public facilities, and services. e. The need for redevelopment, including the renewal of blighted areas and the elimination of nonconforming uses which are inconsistent with the character of the community. f. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to or closely proximate to military installations. Packet Pg. 720 9.A.4.a PL20200002204 g. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to an airport as defined in s. 330.35 and consistent with s. 333.02. h. The discouragement of urban sprawl. i. The need for job creation, capital investment, and economic development that will strengthen and diversify the community's economy. j. The need to modify land uses and development patterns within antiquated subdivisions. Section 163.3177(6)(a)8. Florida Statutes: (a) A future land use plan element designating proposed future general distribution, location, and extent of the uses of land for residential uses, commercial uses, industry, agriculture, recreation, conservation, education, public facilities, and other categories of the public and private uses of land. The approximate acreage and the general range of density or intensity of use shall be provided for the gross land area included in each existing land use category. The element shall establish the long- term end toward which land use programs and activities are ultimately directed. 8. Future land use map amendments shall be based upon the following analyses: a. An analysis of the availability of facilities and services. b. An analysis of the suitability of the plan amendment for its proposed use considering the character of the undeveloped land, soils, topography, natural resources, and historic resources on site. c. An analysis of the minimum amount of land needed to achieve the goals and requirements of this section. The petitioner must provide appropriate and relevant data and analysis to address the statutory requirements for a Plan Amendment. For this petition, a narrative justification (Exhibit V.D.1. "Justification and Supplemental information - Mission Subdistrict GMPA") was provided by the applicant, along with a Supplement Narrative submitted on January 5, 2024. Section 163.3187 Florida Statutes: Process for adoption of small scale comprehensive plan amendment. [Staff s findings are in italics] (1) A small scale development amendment may be adopted under the following conditions: (a) The proposed amendment involves a use of 50 acres or fewer. [The subject site comprises 35.92f acres.] (b) The proposed amendment does not involve a text change to the goals, policies, and objectives of the local government's comprehensive plan, but only proposes a land use change to the future land use map for a site -specific small-scale development activity. However, text changes that relate directly to, and are adopted simultaneously with, the small-scale future land use map amendment shall be permissible under this section. [This amendment does include a text change to the Comprehensive Plan and those text changes are directly related to the proposed future land use map amendment.] (c) The property that is the subject of the proposed amendment is not located within an area of critical state concern, unless the project subject to the proposed amendment involves the construction of affordable housing units meeting the criteria of s. 420.0004(3) and is located within an area of critical state concern designated by s. 380.0552 or by the Administration Commission pursuant to s. 380.05(1). [The subject property is not located within an Area of Critical State Concern.] 10 Packet Pg. 721 9.A.4.a PL20200002204 (d) Comprehensive plans may only be amended in such a way as to preserve the internal consistency of the plan pursuant to s. 163.3177. Corrections, updates, or modifications of current costs which were set out as part of the comprehensive plan shall not, for the purposes of this act, be deemed to be amendments. [This amendment preserves the internal consistency of the plan and is not a correction, update, or modification of current costs that were set out as part of the comprehensive plan.] The applicant conducted a NIM on September 30, 2021, at the UF/IFAS Extension at 14700 Immokalee Road in Naples, Florida. The meeting commenced at 5:30 p.m., and approximately seven residents attended the meeting along with the Agent's team, the Applicant, and county staff. Due to the passing of over a year, another NIM was held on August 14, 2023, at UF/IFAS Extension at 14700 Immokalee Road in Naples, Florida. Approximately five residents were in attendance, along with the Agent's team, the Applicant, and county staff. The NIM summary, PowerPoint presentation, and sign -in sheets are included in the CCPC backup materials. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: • The petition proposes a small-scale Growth Management Plan amendment to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan, Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element, Mission Subdistrict to amend the Subdistrict to increase the Subdistrict area from 21.72 acres to 35.9 acres and to allow additional commercial and institutional uses while maintaining the currently approved maximum of 90,000 square feet of development. A name change of the Subdistrict is also proposed. The petition does not contain sufficient data to demonstrate need for commercial activities at this location. A demonstration of need for the additional uses proposed was requested by staff at the pre -application conference in 2020, as well as through each of the five review cycles that have occurred over the last four years. That information has not been provided, except as noted in this report ("... establishing a sense of community and providing a public space for community engagement.") • Staff does not support the inclusion of commercial activities of Food Trucks and Medical/Health Clinics into the Community Facilities Subdistrict and recommends that these uses be removed from the Subdistrict. • There are public utility -related concerns regarding the lack of available infrastructure to serve the proposal. The Subdistrict is included in the Collier County Water and Sewer District (CCWSD); however, it is not included in the water and sewer service area as there is no available water and sewer service to the Subdistrict. • The lack of public water and sewer to serve the Subdistrict will result in the construction and utilization of interim well and septic facilities for any development of the site. • The existing site development utilizes Porta-Potties, and this form of sanitation is proposed to continue if Food Trucks were allowed to operate on the site. • An Interim Facilities Agreement with Public Utilities is part of the CFPUD. • There are no adverse environmental impacts as a result of this petition. • No historical or archaeological sites are affected by this amendment. • There are no transportation concerns as a result of this petition. • There are no concerns about impacts on other public infrastructure. • The site's uses, if commercial uses are allowed, will create impacts on the surrounding area. 11 Packet Pg. 722 9.A.4.a PL20200002204 LEGAL REVIEW: The County Attorney's office reviewed the staff report on February 8, 2024. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Collier County Planning Commission forward petition PL20200002204 Emmanuel Lutheran Church Community Facilities and Services Subdistrict GMPA to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation to approve and adopt and transmit to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity and other statutorily required agencies with the following modifications — to remove Food Trucks and Medical Offices from the allowed uses in the Subdistrict as depicted below: [Note: Words underlined are added, words stmek through are deleted - as proposed by the petitioner; words double underlined and highlighted are added, and words and highlighted are deleted, as proposed by staff.] EXHIBIT A Golden Gate Area Master Plan Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element A. Estates — Mixed Use District C. List of Maps 4. Mien Emmanuel Lutheran Church Community Facilities and Services Subdistrict The Mission Emmanuel Lutheran Church Community Facilities and Services Subdistrict is located on the south side of Oil Well Road, approximately one quarter mile west of Everglades Boulevard, and consists of 21L35.92 acres. The Subdistrict has been designated on the Rural Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map and the Emmanuel Lutheran Church Community Facilities and Services Subdistrict Map. The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide for churches and related uses, and other community facilities and services to serve the population of this area of Collier County and to provide public space for community engagement. inel ding ,.,.mm unit , o ut..o.,e . The subdistrict shall be zoned Planned Unit Development (PUD). The PUD shall include development standards and perimeter buffering to ensure compatibility with adjacent lands. The following uses are allowed: a. Churches and places of worship. b. Child care eenters services. must be not for- profit and affiliated with a ,.h,,re c. Private or public schools. must be not for- profit and affilivAed with a ,.h,,,.e . d. Individual and family social services (activity centers, elderly or handicapped only; counseling centers, day care centers, adult and handicapped only);— disaster services; helping hand services; meal delivery programs; multiservice centers, neighborhood; outreach programs, relief services, temporary; service leagues; must be not -for -profit. and affiliated with a ,.htff,.hwithin- the c„t dis -iet 12 Packet Pg. 723 9.A.4.a PL20200002204 e. Medical outreach to the community, to include activities such as administering iniquenz vaccines, i9faviding, w...:,. , ..,..,,_ . _RHEI a , and conducting blood donation drives. must be at f r e fi . TO - e4lita , .Ah a ,.h -e , within the e„bdistfiet f. Colleges and universities — must be not -for -profit. g_ Job training and vocational rehabilitation services — must be not -for -profit. Vocational rehabilitation services shall not include uses such as outboard or diesel engine repair that could emit noise bevond the boundaries of the subdistrict. h. Physical fitness facilities —must be not -for -profit and operated with a church or place of worship within the Subdistrict. i. Essential services, including law enforcement, fire, emergency medical services and facilities, public park, and public library services and facilities, including a mobile or manufactured home for use by a sheriff s deputy_(and family,). l United States Postal Service, except major distribution center. k. Interim agricultural activities, including, but not limited to: Crop raising; horticulture; fruit and nut production; forestry, groves, nurseries, ranching; beekeeping, poultry and egg production; milk production; livestock raising, and nd aquaculture for native species subject to Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission permits; these uses are interim uses allowed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any other permitted principal use. m. Garden Plots, to be utilized by church members or students and their families. n. Recreational facilities including outdoor play areas and athletic field, administration offices and facilities, and indoor youth recreation centers to support church uses. The athletic field shall be limited to the location depicted on the PUD Master Plan as "Football/Soccer Field" and "Softball Field". Soup kitchens and homeless shelters are prohibited in this Subdistrict. The maximum total floor area allowed in this Subdistrict is 90,000 square feet. The maximum height of buildings shall be 30 feet zoned height, except the worship center shall be permitted a zoned height of 35 feet. Development in this Subdistrict shall be designed to be compatible with the existing, and allowed future, development in the surrounding area. In the alternate to the foregoing uses, measures of development intensity, and development standards, this Subdistrict may be developed with single family dwellings in accordance with the Residential Estates Subdistrict. Seventy-five foot (75') wide buffer areas are required along the east, west and southwest property lines abutting residential development as shown on the CFPUD Master Plan. However, play fields are permitted in a portion of the 75-foot-wide buffer area shown on the west and southwest property lines 13 Packet Pg. 724 9.A.4.a PL20200002204 along with an existing lake, as shown on the CFPUD Master Plan. A twenty-five foot (20') wide Type "D" buffer is required along Oil Well Road and twenty-five foot (25',) wide Type "B" buffers are required along the east, west and southwest south property lines as shown on the CFPUD Master Plan. Property adjacent to this Subdistrict shall not qualify for the Transitional Conditional Use. BCC Meeting Date: April 23, 2024 14 Packet Pg. 725 9.A.4.b ORDINANCE NO. 2024- AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 89-05, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SUB -ELEMENT OF THE GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN ELEMENT AND RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND MAP SERIES TO REVISE THE MISSION SUBDISTRICT OF THE MIXED USE DISTRICT, TO ADD 14 ACRES TO SUBDISTRICT; TO CHANGE THE NAME OF THE SUBDISTRICT TO EMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH COMMUNITY FACILITIES AND SERVICES SUBDISTRICT; TO ALLOW ADDITIONAL USES INCLUDING COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES, SOCIAL SERVICE USES, GOVERNMENT USES, MEDICAL OFFICE, PHYSICAL FITNESS FACILITIES, FOOD TRUCKS AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES ON PROPERTY CONSISTING OF 35.92E ACRES; AND FURTHERMORE, DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE ADOPTED AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PL20200002204] WHEREAS, Collier County, pursuant to Section 163.3161, et. seq., Florida Statutes, the Florida Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, was required to prepare and adopt a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners adopted the Collier County Growth Management Plan on January 10, 1989; and WHEREAS, the Community Planning Act of 2011 provides authority for local governments to amend their respective comprehensive plans and outlines certain procedures to amend adopted comprehensive plans; and WHEREAS, Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples, Inc. requested an amendment to the Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub -element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element and Urban Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map and Map Series to revise the Mission Subdistrict; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Subsection 163.3187(1), Florida Statutes, this amendment is considered a Small -Scale Amendment; and WHEREAS, the Subdistrict property is not located in an area of critical state concern or a rural area of opportunity; and [21-CMP-01104/1842674/1] 100 Mission Subdistrict Page 1 of 3 PL20200002204 021624 Packet Pg. 726 9.A.4.b WHEREAS, the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) on considered the proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan and recommended approval of said amendment to the Board of County Commissioners; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County did take action in the manner prescribed by law and held public hearings concerning the proposed adoption of the amendment to the Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub -element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element and Urban Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map and Map Series of the Growth Management Plan on ; and WHEREAS, all applicable substantive and procedural requirements of law have been met. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: ADOPTION OF AMENDMENT TO THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN The Board of County Commissioners hereby adopts this small-scale amendment to the Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub -element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element and Urban Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map and Map Series in accordance with Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes. The text and map amendment are attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION TWO: SEVERABILITY. If any phrase or portion of this Ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion. SECTION THREE: EFFECTIVE DATE. The effective date of this plan amendment, if the amendment is not timely challenged, shall be 31 days after Board approval. If timely challenged, this amendment shall become effective on the date the state land planning agency or the Administration Commission enters a final order determining this adopted amendment to be in compliance. No development orders, development permits, or land uses dependent on this amendment may be issued before it has become effective. [21-CMP-01104/1842674/1] 100 Mission Subdistrict Page 2 of 3 PL20200002204 021624 Packet Pg. 727 9.A.4.b PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida this day of , 2024. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA M. Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legality: Heidi Ashton-Cicko, Managing Assistant County Attorney IIn Chris Hall, Chairman Attachment: Exhibit A — Proposed Text Amendment & Map Amendment [21-CMP-01104/1842674/1] 100 Mission Subdistrict PL20200002204 021624 Page 3 of 3 Packet Pg. 728 Exhibit A PL20200002204 9.A.4.b EXHIBIT A Golden Gate Area Master Plan Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element A. Estates — Mixed Use District — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — C. List of Maps — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 4. Mission Emmanuel Lutheran Church Community Facilities and Services Subdistrict The Mission Emmanuel Lutheran Church Community Facilities and Services Subdistrict is located on the south side of Oil Well Road, approximately one quarter mile west of Everglades Boulevard, and consists of 21.7235.92 acres. The Subdistrict has been designated on the Rural Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map and the Emmanuel Lutheran Church Community Facilities and Services Subdistrict Map. The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide for churches and related uses, and other community facilities and services to serve the population of this area of Collier Copp . and to provide public space for community engagement.�g The subdistrict shall be zoned Planned Unit Development (PUD.. The PUD shall include development standards and perimeter buffering to ensure compatibility adjacent lands. The following uses are allowed: a. Churches and places of worship. b. Child care eenler-s services. must be not for- profit and affiliated with a ,.hu � c. Private or public schools. _ d. Individual and family social services (activity centers, elderly or handicapped only; counseling centers, day care centers, adult and handicapped only);- disaster services; helping hand services, meal delivery programs; multiservice centers, neighborhood; outreach programs; relief services, temporary; service leagues; must be not -for -profit. and affiliated with ., ehtweh within the c„i..dist iet e. Medical outreach to the community, to include activities such as administering ifiguenza vaccines, providing medical check-ups, and related examinations, ekeeking b! pressufe, and conducting blood donation drives. must be not for- prof'*. To facilitate these services a medical/health clinic is permitted, not to exceed 3,600 square in size, and operated by a not -for -profit organization. affiliated with a ,.hur-e or within the Subdis4ietT f. Colleges and universities — must be not -for -profit. g_ Job training and vocational rehabilitation services — must be not -for -profit. Vocational rehabilitation services shall not include uses such as outboard or diesel engine repair that could emit noise beyond the boundaries of the subdistrict. Page 1 of 5 Words underlined are added; words struck -through are deleted. 2/16/2024 Packet Pg. 729 Exhibit A PL20200002204 9.A.4.b h. Physical fitness facilities — must be not -for -profit and operated with a church or place of worship within the Subdistrict. i. Essential services, including law enforcement, fire, emergency medical services and facilities, public park, and public library services and facilities, including a mobile or manufactured home for use by a sheriff's deputy (and family). L United States Postal Service, except major distribution center. k. Interim agricultural activities, including, but not limited to: Crop raising; horticulture; fruit and nut production; forestry; groves; nurseries; ranching; beekeeping; poultry and egg production; milk production; livestock raising, and aquaculture for native species subiect to Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission permits: these uses are interim uses allowed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any other permitted principal use. I. Food trucks (SIC 5963), limited to a maximum of four at any time. Other limitations or standards may be provided for within the PUD. m. Garden Plots, to be utilized by church members or students and their families. n. Recreational facilities including outdoor play areas and athletic field, administration offices and facilities, and indoor youth recreation centers to support church uses. The athletic field shall be limited to the location depicted on the PUD Master Plan as "Football/Soccer Field" and "Softball Field". Soup kitchens and homeless shelters are prohibited in this Subdistrict. The maximum total floor area allowed in this Subdistrict is 90,000 square feet. The maximum height of buildings shall be 30 feet zoned height, except the worship center shall be permitted a zoned height of 35 feet. Development in this Subdistrict shall be designed to be compatible with the existing, and allowed future, development in the surrounding area. In the alternate to the foregoing uses, measures of development intensity, and development standards, this Subdistrict may be developed with single family dwellings in accordance with the Residential Estates Subdistrict. Seventy-five foot (75') wide buffer areas are required along the east, west and southwest Property lines abutting residential development as shown on the CFPUD Master Plan. However, play fields are permitted in a portion of the 75-foot-wide buffer area shown on the west and southwest property lines along with an existing lake, as shown on the CFPUD Master Plan. A twenty foot (20') wide Type "D" buffer is required along Oil Well Road and twenty-five foot (25') wide Type "B" buffers are required along the east, west and southwest south Page 2 of 5 Words underlined are added; words struck -through are deleted. 2/16/2024 Packet Pg. 730 Exhibit A PL2O2OOOO22O4 9.A.4.b property lines as shown on the CFPUD Master Plan. Property adjacent to this Subdistrict shall not qualify for the Transitional Conditional Use. Page 3 of 5 Words underlined are added; words struck -through are deleted. 2/16/2024 Packet Pg. 731 Exhibit A w YIEEIYilirt1141 � , ',�,�, FINE WCE %V W 4 64UYTr Orr E3: UM'A' 9.A.4.b PL20200002204 as afritim uao¢onrnuzo+ v RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES 900- FUTURE LAND USE MAP I Y r �� rca wsa awn a E TI .sujeCt site Packet Pg. 732 m 9.A.4.c The original name of the PUD was the Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church Community Facilities PUD; and the GMP Subdistrict was the Mission Subdistrict. To align the names with the intent of the PUD and Subdistrict, the names were changed to the Emmanuel Lutheran Church Community Services CFPUD and the Emmanuel Lutheran Church Community Facilities and Services Subdistrict. The names were not updated on the supporting application materials and exhibits, as the name change has no material effect on these documents or exhibits, only on the documents that will be included in the recorded ordinances: the Proposed GMPA Amendment Language, Subdistrict Inset Map, and CPUD Document. Packet Pg. 734 9.A.4.c PRE -APPLICATION MEETING NOTES Packet Pg. 735 9.A.4.c Co*,r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 Pre -Application Meeting Notes Petition Type: GMPA Date and Time: Nov. 24, 202010:00 AM Assigned Planner: Sue Faulkner Engineering Manager (for PPL's and FP's): I Project Information I Project Name: Mission Subdistrict PL #: PL20200002204 Property ID #: Current Zoning: CFPUD & E Project Address Oil Well Road City Naples State: FL Zip: Applicant: Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church Agent Name: Bob Mulhere Phone: 239-825-9373 Agent/Firm Address: Holes Montes City Naples State: FL Zip: 34110 Property Owner: Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church Please provide the following, if applicable: i. Total Acreage: adding 14.2 acres to Mission Subdistrict 21.72 acres = 35.92 ii. Proposed # of Residential Units: 0 iii. Proposed Commercial Square Footage: 0 iv. For Amendments, indicate the original petition number: V. If there is an Ordinance or Resolution associated with this project, please indicate the type and number: Ord. #10-31 vi. If the project is within a Plat, provide the name and AR#/PL#: Updated 7/24/2018 Page I 1 of 5 Packet Pg. 736 9.A.4.c CAA County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 Meeting Notes As of 10/16/2017 all Zoning applications have revised applications, and your associated Application is included in your notes; additionally a *new Property Ownership Disclosure Form is required for all applications. A copy of this new form is included in your pre-app Note — link is https://www.colliergov.net/Home/ShowDocument?id=75093. The subject site is designated Golden Gate Estates within the Rural Golden Gate Estates SubElement of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. This site was previously approved to be zoned as a Community Facility PUD with Ord. #10-31. The applicant wishes to add 14.2 acres to the existing 21.72 acres making a total of 35.92 acres. The applicant also wishes to amend for additional uses. The GMP will need an amendment for the text changes for the acreage increase and the additional uses. Comp. Planning will also need a revised Subdistrict map — please zoom in a little for this amended map so that is easier to see exactly what the boundaries are for this Subdistrict. The applicant mentioned that the area is underserved. please make sure to elaborate on this in the application. Other required documentation for submittal (not listed on application): Disclaimer. Information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required data. Updated 7/24/2018 Page 1 2 of 5 Packet Pg. 737 Co*P,-r County 9.A.4.c� 2 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net Meeting Notes 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 As of 10/16/2017 all Zoning applications have revised applications, and your associated Application is included in your notes; additionally a *new Property Ownership Disclosure Form is required for all applications. A copy of this new form is included in your pre-app Note — link is https://www.colliergov.net/Home/ShowDocument?id=75093. or PIC'ASE Nov,& ENi,raNmFN4,,�,L 'Dr,1,4 tot +hE A00,4,oNaL >lib parcelS Auccs M4-0 Lts�Ed SPemeS) thl' Pre-Ser-yE Rec,,,'ttrMwi CN wo _ IL Acres I f g 6l- [y4-4i lE nq E4.+4,o,J . PlekSE Pro„, dr- Pere + - WS"rq % Ae-rl gL +a EV V14►rJ ArehS Cl P-Are.d 6� NA4,1JE UE4E1Ad*tJ d (ovlk IVACt441vE rcWw' d-o L[nE Cow I14-JcE Poll.l. I + PaltC-y I- l- I . (6,MPA — SEE rr,,,7,,zis ; If Site is within the City of Naples Water Service Area please send to Naples Utilities and Planning Departments. Then, if the petition is submitted, we are to send it (by email) to the four persons below in their Utilities and Planning Depts. - along with a request that they send us a letter or email of "no objection" to the petition. Bob Middleton RMiddleton(d@naplesgov.com Allyson Holland AMHolland(@naplesgov.com Robin Singer RSinger(c�naplesgov.com Erica Martin emartin(aDnaplesgov.com Disclaimer- Information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required data. Updated 7/11/2019 Page 1 2 of 5 Packet Pg. 738 J 9.A.4.c Environmental PUDZ-PUDA Checklist (non-RFMU) Project Name EmffiA UEL EiPMdrt4L Lu41,erW(Worch 1. Is the project is in compliance with the overlays, districts and/or zoning on the subject site and/or the surrounding properties? (CON, ST, PUD, RLSA, RFMU, etc.) (LDC 2.03.05-2.03.08; 4.08.00) Not in CV Library 0 Submit a current aerial photograph (available from the Property Appraiser's office) and clearly delineate the subject site boundary lines. If the site is vegetated, provide FLUCFCS overlay and vegetation inventory identifying upland, wetland and exotic vegetation (Admin. Code Ch. 3 G.1. Application Contents #24). FLUCFCS Overlay -P627 I 3.1 Clearly identify the location of all preserves and label each as "Preserve" on all plans. (LDC 3.05.07.H.1). �J Preserve Label- P546 D Provide calculations on site plan showing the appropriate acreage of native vegetation to be retained, the rnax. amount and ratios permitted to be created on -site or mitigated off -site. Exclude vegetation located within utility and drainage easements from the preserve calculations (LDC 3.05.07.13-13; 3.05.07.F; 3.05.07.H.1.d-e). Preserve Calculation - P547 5. Created and retained preserve areas shall meet the minimum width requirements per LDC 3.05.07.H.1.b. Preserve Width - P603 6. Retained preservation areas shall be selected based on the criteria defined in LDC 3.05.07.A.3, include all 3 strata, be in the largest contiguous area possible and shall be interconnected within the site and to adjoining off -site preservation areas or wildlife corridors. (LDC 3.05.07.A.1-4) Preserve Selection- P550 70. Principle structures shall be located a minimum of 25' from the boundary of the preserve boundary. No accessory structures and other site alterations, fill placement, grading, plant alteration or removal, or similar activity shall be permitted within 10' of the boundary unless it can be shown that it will not affect the integrity of the preserve (i.e. stem wall or berm around wetland preserve). Provide cross -sections for each preserve boundary identifying all site alterations within 25'. (LDC 3.05.07.H.3; 6.01.02.C.) Preserve Setback — New 8. Wildlife survey required for sites where an EIS is not required, when so warranted. (LDC 10.02.02.A.2.0 Listed Species - P522 1 9.) Provide Environmental Data identifying author credentials, consistency determination with the GMPs, off -site �./ preserves, seasonal and historic high water levels, and analysis of water quality. For land previously used for farm fields or golf course, provide soil sampling/groundwater monitoring reports identifying any site contamination. (LDC 3.08.00) Environmental Data Required — P 522 10. PUD Document and Master Plan shall state the minimum acreage required to be preserved. (LDC 10.02.13.A.2) Master Plan Contents-P626 11. If the PUD includes a Preserve Tract section UP FOR DISCUSSION — DISCUSS WITH CAO When listing preserve uses, the following is suggested: A. Principal Use: Preserve; B. Accessory Uses: All other uses (list as applicable or refer to the LDC — see 1-3 below as typical uses listed by agents) (ensure the text states "subject to LDC section related to Allowable uses within County required preserves" Alternate format: A. Uses subject to LDC section Allowable uses within County required preserves: 1. Nature trails that do not reduce the amount of required preserve. 2. Passive Recreation uses, as per LDC requirements. 3. Stormwater only when in accordance with the LDC. Packet Pg. 739 P 9.A.4.c PUD Commitments and Site Plan notes Where preserves occur adjacent to development off site and will be used in lieu of landscape buffers, include the following condition in the environmental commitments section of the PUD document or master plan: Preserves may be used to satisfy the landscape buffer requirements after exotic vegetation removal in accordance with LDC sections 4.06.02 and 4.06.05.E.1. Supplemental plantings with native plant materials shall be in accordance with LDC section 3.05.07. 12 PUD Document shall identify any listed species found on site and/or describe any unique vegetative features that will be preserved on the site. (LDC 10.02.13.A.2.) Unique Features- P628 Example: A management plan for the entire project shall be submitted in accordance with the requirements and procedures of the LDC for listed species including but not limited to Black Bear, Gopher Tortoise and listed birds. The management plan shall be submitted prior to development of the first phase of the project. 13. Review cross -sections if provided; they are not required with the PUD. However, sometimes they are provided. Is there any fill proposed in the preserve? Additional Comments: Packet Pg. 740 1 9.A.4.c Environmental Data Checklist Project Name- 5MMANUEL EyAa5EJstAL Luf- er4N Church P UQA- The Environmental Data requirements can be found in LDC Section 3.08.00 Provide the EIS fee if PUD or CU. (2.) WHO AND WHAT COMPANY PREPARED THE ENVIRONMENTAL DATA REPORT? Preparation of Environmental Data. Environmental Data Submittal Requirements shall be prepared by an individual with academic credentials and experience in the area of environmental sciences or natural resource management. Academic credentials and experience shall be a bachelor's or higher degree in one of the biological sciences with at least two years of ecological or biological professional experience in the State of Florida. Please include revision dates on resubmittals. ( j3r Identify on a current aerial, the location and acreage of all SFWMD jurisdictional wetlands according to the \ J Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS) and include this information on the SDP or final plat construction plans. Wetlands must be verified by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) or Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) prior to SDP or final plat construction plans approval. For sites in the RFMU district, provide an assessment in accordance with 3.05.07 F and identify on the FLUCFCS map the location of all high quality wetlands (wetlands having functionality scores of at least 0.65 WRAP or 0.7 UMAM) and their location within the proposed development plan. Sites with high quality wetlands must have their functionality scores verified by the SFWMD or DEP prior to first development order approval. Where functionality scores have not been verified by either the SFWMD or DEP, scores must be reviewed and accepted by County staff, consistent with State regulation. SDP or final plat construction plans with impacts to five (5) or more acres of wetlands shall provide an analysis of potential water quality impacts of the project by evaluating water quality loadings expected from the project (post development conditions considering the proposed land uses and stormwater management controls) compared with water quality loadings of the project area as it exists in its pre -development conditions. The analysis shall be performed using methodologies approved by Federal and State water quality agencies, and must demonstrate no increase in nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorous) loadings in the post development scenario. Where treated stormwater is allowed to be directed into preserves, show how the criteria in 3.05.07 H have been met. 6. Where native vegetation is retained on site, provide a topographic map to a half foot and, where possible, provide elevations within each of the FLUCFCS Codes identified on site. For SDP or final plat construction plans, include this information on the site plans. 0 Provide a wildlife survey for the nests of bald eagle and for listed species known to inhabit biological communities similar to those existing on site. The survey shall be conducted in accordance with the guidelines or recommendations of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Survey times may be reduced or waived where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low, as determined by the FFWCC and USFWS. Where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low, the survey time may be reduced or waived by the County Manager or designee, when the project is not reviewed or technical assistance not provided by the FFWCC and USFWS. Additional survey time may be required if listed species are discovered 8. Provide a survey for listed plants identified in 3.04.03 i 9. Wildlife habitat management and monitoring plans in accordance with 3.04.00 shall be required where listed species are utilizing the site or where wildlife habitat management and monitoring plans are required by the FFWCC or USFWS. These plans shall describe how the project directs incompatible land uses away from listed species and their habitats. Identify the location of listed species nests, burrows, dens, foraging areas, and the a y Packet Pg. 741 9.A.4.c location of any bald eagle nests or nest protection zones on the native vegetation aerial with FLUCFCS overlay for the site. Wildlife habitat management plans shall be included on the SDP or final plat construction plans. Bald eagle management plans are required for sites containing bald eagle nests or nest protection zones, copies of which shall be included on the SDP or final plat construction plans. 10. For sites or portions of sites cleared of native vegetation or in agricultural operation, provide documentation that the parcel(s) were issued a permit to be cleared and are in compliance with the 25 year rezone limitation pursuant to section 10.02.06. For sites permitted to be cleared prior to July 2003, provide documentation that the parcel(s) are in compliance with the 10 year rezone limitation previously identified in the GMP. Criteria defining native vegetation and determining the legality, process and criteria for clearing are found in 3.05.05, 3.05.07 and 10.02.06. SIdentify on a current aerial the acreage, location and community types of all upland and wetland habitats on the project site, according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS), and provide a legend for each of the FLUCFCS Codes identified. Aerials and overlay information must be legible at the scale provided. Provide calculations for the acreage of native vegetation required to be retained on -site. Include the above referenced calculations and aerials on the SDP or final plat construction plans. In a separate report, demonstrate how the preserve selection criteria pursuant to 3.05.07 have been met. Where applicable, include in this report an aerial showing the project boundaries along with any undeveloped land, preserves, natural flowways or other natural land features, located on abutting properties. 12. Include on a separate site plan, the project boundary and the land use designations and overlays for the RLSA, RFMU, ST and ACSC-ST districts. Include this information on the SDP or final plat construction plans. 13. Where off -site preservation of native vegetation is proposed in lieu of on -site, demonstrate that the criteria in section 3.05.07 have been met and provide a note on the SDP or final plat construction plans indicating the type of donation (monetary payment or land donation) identified to satisfy the requirement. Include on the SDP or final plat construction plans, a location map(s) and property identification number(s) of the off -site parcel(s) if off -site donation of land is to occur. 14. Provide the results of any Environmental Assessments and/or Audits of the property, along with a narrative of the measures needed to remediate if required by FDEP. GSoil and/or ground water sampling shall be required at the time of first development order submittal for sites that occupy farm fields (crop fields, cattle dipping ponds, chemical mixing areas), golf courses, landfill or junkyards or for sites where hazardous products exceeding 250 gallons of liquid or 1,000 pounds of solids were stored or processed or where hazardous wastes in excess of 220 pounds per month or 110 gallons at any point in time were generated or stored. The amount of sampling and testing shall be determined by a registered professional with experience in the field of Environmental Site Assessment and shall at a minimum test for organochlorine pesticides (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 8081) and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) 8 metals using Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) soil sampling Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) FS 3000, in areas suspected of being used for mixing and at discharge point of water management system. Sampling should occur randomly if no points of contamination are obvious. Include a background soil analysis from an undeveloped location hydraulically upgradient of the potentially contaminated site. Soil sampling should occur just below the root zone, about 6 to 12 inches below ground surface or as otherwise agreed upon with the registered professional with experience in the field of Environmental Site Assessment. Include in or with the Environmental Site Assessment, the acceptable State and Federal pollutant levels for the types of contamination found on site and indicate in the Assessment, when the contaminants are over these levels. If this analysis has been done as part of an Environmental Audit then the report shall be submitted. The County shall coordinate with the FDEP where contamination exceeding applicable FDEP standards is identified on site or where an Environmental Audit or Environmental Assessment has been submitted. 'C hAJBL Q,EQUIaEd A Pt(S� DE.UEIop K;J+ OfdEL 16. Shoreline development must provide an analysis demonstrating that the project will remain fully functional for its intended use after a six-inch rise in sea level. Packet Pg. 742 P 9.A.4.c 17. Provide justification for deviations from environmental LDC provisions pursuant to GMP CCME Policy 6.1.1 (13), if requested. 18. Where applicable, provide evidence of the issuance of all applicable federal and/or state oil and gas permits for proposed oil and gas activities in Collier County. Include all state permits that comply with the requirements of Chapter 62C-25 through 62C-30, F.A.C., as those rules existed on January 13, 2005. 0-9 Identify any Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones (WRM-ST) within the project area and provide an analysis for how the project design avoids the most intensive land uses within the most sensitive WRM-STs and will comply with the WRM-ST pursuant to 3.06.00. Include the location of the Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones on the SDP or final plat construction plans. For land use applications such as standard and PUD rezones and CUs, provide a separate site plan or zoning map with the project boundary and Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones identified. 20. Demonstrate that the design of the proposed stormwater management system and analysis of water quality and quantity impacts fully incorporate the requirements of the Watershed Management regulations of 3.07.00. 21. For sites located in the Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern -Special Treatment overlay district (ACSC- ST), show how the project is consistent with the development standards and regulations in 4.02.14. 22. For multi -slip docking facilities with ten slips or more, and for all marina facilities, show how the project is consistent with 5.05.02. Refer to the Manatee Protection Plan for site specific requirements of the Manatee Protection Plan not included in 5.05.02. 23. For development orders within RFMU sending lands, show how the project is consistent with each of the applicable Objectives and Policies of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the GMP. G The County Manager or designee may require additional data or information necessary to evaluate the project's compliance with LDC and GMP requirements. (LDC 10.02.02.A.3 f) The following to be determined at preapplication meeting: (Choose those that apply) a. Provide overall description of project with respect to environmental and water management issues. b1 Explain how project is consistent with each of the applicable objectives and policies in the CCME of the GMP. PoltCj G.1 • I + POlrt-Y �l • I - I c� Explain how the project meets or exceeds the native vegetation preservation requirement in the CCME and LDC. d. Indicate wetlands to be impacted and the effects of the impact to their functions and how the project's design compensates for wetland impacts. e. Indicate how the project design minimizes impacts to listed species. Describe the measures that are proposed as mitigation for impacts to listed species. 25. PUD zoning and CU petitions. For PUD rezones and CU petitions, applicants shall collate and package applicable Environmental Data Submittal Requirements into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) document, prior to public hearings and after all applicable staff reviews are complete. Copies of the EIS shall be provided to the County Manager or designee prior to public hearings. 26. Is EAC Review (by CCPC) required? TO Packet Pg. 743 11 9.A.4.c 27. PUD master plan or PPL/SDP site plan notes: Where preserves occur adjacent to development off site and will be used in lieu of landscape buffers, include the following condition in the environmental commitments section of the PUD document. Preserves may be used to satisfy the landscape buffer requirements after exotic vegetation removal in accordance with LDC sections 4.06.02 and 4.06.05.E.1. Supplemental plantings with native plant materials shall be in accordance with LDC section 3.05.07. 28. Additional comments 29. Stipulations for approval (Conditions) N C O 2 d O N N O O O O N O N J a N �L d C� C U d V U m t K W r C d E t R .r a Packet Pg. 744 9.A.4.c Transportation Planning and PUD Monitoring Pre-App Notes Developer Commitments: Transportation Planning " The maximum total daily trip generation for the PUD shall not exceed two-way PM peak hour net trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval." Use Codes Provide both ITE and SIC use codes in the TIS. PUD Monitoring "One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close- out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this CPUD approval, the Managing Entity is the Insert Company Name Here. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the CPUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed -out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments." Miscellaneous "Pursuant to Section 125.022(5) F.S., issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development." L3� Packet Pg. 745 9.A.4.c Gor GOunt y COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 r�Uen vu Pre -Application Meeting Sign -In Sheet G m R/4 (�C # oZ 0 A O oLo;t a O4 Collier County Contact Information: VA Name Review Discipline Phone Email ❑ David Anthony Environmental Review 252-2497 david.anthony@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Claudine Auclair GMD Operations and Regulatory Management 252-5887 claudine.auclair@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Sally Ashkar I Assistant County Attorney 252-8842 sally.ashkar@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Steve Baluch Transportation Planning 252-2361 stephen.baluch@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Ray Bellows Zoning, Planning Manager 252-2463 raymond.bellows@ col liercountyfLgov I,aorie Beard PUD Monitoring 252-5782 laurie.beard@colliercountyfl.gov Craig Brown Environmental Specialist 252-2548 craig.brown@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Ale ndra Casanova Operations Coordinator 252-2658 Alexandra.casanova @colIiercountyfLgov HOKAshton Cicko Managing Asst. County Attorney 252-8773 heidi.ashton@colliercountyfl.gov Thomas Clarke Operations Coordinator 252-2584 thomas.clarke@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jamie Cook Prin. Environmental Specialist 252-6290 Jaime.cook@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Eric Fey, P.E. Utility Planning 252-1037 eric.fey@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Tim Finn, AICP Zoning Division 252-4312 timothy.finn@colliercountyfl.gov Sue Faulkner Comprehensive Planning 252-5715 sue.faulkner@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jeremy Frantz LDC Manager 252-2305 Jeremy.Frantz@ col IiercountyfLgov ❑ James French Growth Management Deputy Department Head 252-5717 james.french@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Michael Gibbons Structural/Residential Plan Review 252-2426 michael.gibbons@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Storm Gewirtz, P.E. Engineering Stormwater 252-2434 storm.gewirtz@colliercountyfl.gov Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA Zoning Division 252-2484 nancy.gundlach@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Richard Henderlong Principal Planner 252-2464 richard.henderlong@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ John Houldsworth Engineering Subdivision 252-5757 john.houldsworth@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Alicia Humphries Right -Of -Way Permitting 252-2326 alicia.humphries@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Erin Josephitis Environmental Specialist, Senior 252-2915 erin.josephitis@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Marcia Kendall Comprehensive Planning 252-2387 marcia.kendall@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ John Kelly Zoning Senior Planner 252-5719 john.kelly@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Diane Lynch Operations Analyst 252-8243 diane.lynch@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Gil Martinez Zoning Principal Planner 252-4211 gilbert.martinez@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Thomas Mastroberto Greater Naples Fire 252-7348 thomas.mastroberto@colliercountyfl.gov Updated 7/11/2019 Page 1 4 of 5 Packet Pg. 746 9.A.4.c Co*r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 ❑ Jack McKenna, P.E. Engineering Services 252-2911 jack.mckenna@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Matt McLean, P.E. I Development Review Director 252-8279 matthew.mclean@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Michele Mosca, AICP Capital Project Planning 252-2466 michele.mosca@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Annis Moxam Addressing 252-5519 annis.moxam@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Richard Orth Stormwater Planning 252-5092 1 richard.orth@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Brandy Otero Transit 252-5859 brandy.otero@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Brandi Pollard Utility Impact fees 252-6237 brandi.pollard@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Todd Riggall North Collier Fire 597-9227 triggall@northcollierfire.com ❑ Brett Rosenblum, P.E. Development Review Principal Project Manager 252-2905 brett.rosenblum@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ James Sabo, AICP Zoning Principal Planner 252-2708 james.sabo@colliergo.net ❑ Michael Sawyer Transportation Planning 252-2926 michael.sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov Corby Schmidt, AICP Comprehensive Planning 252-2944 corby.schmidt@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Chris Scott, AICP Development Review - Zoning 252-2460 chris.scott@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Linda Simmons North Collier Fire 252-2311 Linda.Simmons@colliercountyfg ❑ Peter Shawinsky Architectural Review 252-8523 �peter.shawinsky@colliercountylf*lgoovv ❑ Camden Smith Zoning Operations Manager 252-1042 camden.smith@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ ark Strain Hearing Examiner/CCPC 252-4446 mark.strain@colliercountyfl.gov Mark Templeton Landscape Review 252-2475 mark.templeton@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jessica Velasco Zoning Division Operations 252-2584 jessica.velasco@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jon Walsh, P.E. Building Review 252-2962 jonathan.walsh@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ David Weeks, AICP Comprehensive Planning Future Land Use Consistency 252-2306 david.weeks@col lie rcountyfLgov ❑ Kirsten Wilkie Environmental Review Manager 252-5518 kirsten.wilkie@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Christine Willoughby Development Review - Zoning 252-5748 christine.willoughby@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Daniel Zunzunegui North Collier Fire 252-2310 1 Daniel.Zunzunegui@colliercountyfl.gov Additional Attendee Contact Information- ��iAl� II Val 1. WITS Updated 7/11/2019 Page 1 5 of 5 q0N%4 Packet Pg. 747 1 9.A.4.c Q a le O N N O O O O N O N J IL O LO Co r- N N O N d O N N O O O O N O N J IL e� �L Cw G U IL U Al m s k w m E a Packet Pg. 7 8771 9.A.4.c AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION Packet Pg. 749 9.A.4.c AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PUDA•PL•20200002198 &GMPA-PL-20200002204 I, THOMAS JACKSON (print name), as PRESIDENT (title, if applicable) Of EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH OF NAPLES, INC. (company, If applicable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner0 applicantF7contract purchaserFland that: 1. 1 have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. Well authorize Paula N. C. McMichael, AICP, Robed J. Muthere, FAICP & Richard Yovanovich, Esq, to act as Ourlmy representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. *Notes: • if the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the core. pres, or v, pres. • if the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner" of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee". • in each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and than use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that 1 have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts in it are tru Si naturemh mas Jackson, President D to Emmanuel Evangelical t an Church of Naples, Inc. STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was acknowleged before me by means of physical presence or ®online notarization this ttQJ day of .2 , by (printed name of owner or ifier) Such person(s) Notary ublic must check applicable box: Are personally known to me El Has produced a Current drivers license ® Has produced � � as idenf l atlon. c+ Q Notary Signature: 01108-WA-011115\155 I2 E V 3/J/2020 .Y Ztitit9rji 9rlic State of Florida Regina Fidler My Commission GG 193563 �R Expires03107/2022 Packet Pg. 750 9.A.4.c PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM Q a C9 0 N N Co O O O N O N J a 0 Lo Co ti N N C O d O N N O O O O N O N J a •L m U a U U Co Packet Pg. 751 9.A.4.c COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net Co T County 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP,DISCLOSURE FORM This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the 11 C. ercentage of such interest: Name and Address % of Ownership If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the lercentage oT StOCK owned by each: Name and Address % of Ownership Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples, Inc. 100% 777 Mooring Line Drive, Naples, FL 34102 If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the iercentage of interest: Name and Address % of Ownership Created 9/28/2017 Page 1 of 3 Packet Pg. 752 9.A.4.c COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net COAT: county 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 d. If the propertv is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP. list the name of the ;eneral and/or limited partners: Name and Address % of 0wnershi13 e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the c' �IIII.CI J, )LUt rMU1UUTb, UCIICIILIdIICJ, UI Pdl LIICIJ: Name and Address % of Ownership Date of Contract: f. If anv contingencv clause or contract terms involve additional parties. list all individuals or ticers, it a corporation, partnership, or trust: Name and Address g. Date subject property acquired ❑ Leased: Term of lease years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Created 9/28/2017 Page 2of3 Packet Pg. 753 9.A.4.c COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.c61fiergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Date of option: Date option terminates: . or Anticipated closing date: N`A 1,t Any petition required to have Property. Ownership' Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form. Requirements for petition types are located onthe associated application form. Anychange in ownership whether Individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest -holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County Immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition's final public hearing. As the authorized agent%applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is Included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result In the delay of processing this petition. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Na s, FL 34104 ei Owner Slgnat a Date Agent/Owner Name (please print) Created 9/28/2017 Page 3 of 3 c E' E LU Q aI O N N O O; CD O N O' N J ai O Ln 00 N N c O O N N O ' O O O NI O N J a N �L d C� C U a U U' t K W .r a Packet Pg. 754 9.A.4.c GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION Packet Pg. 755 9.A.4.c APPLICATION FOR A REQUEST TO AMEND THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN APPLICATION NUMBER DATE RECEIVED PRE -APPLICATION CONFERENCE DATE DATE SUFFICIENT This application, with all required supplemental data and information, must be completed and accompanied by the appropriate fee, and returned to the Growth Management Department, Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104. 239-252- 2400. The application must be reviewed by staff for sufficiency within 30 calendar days following the filing deadline before it will be processed and advertised for public hearing. The applicant will be notified in writing, of the sufficiency determination. If insufficient, the applicant will have 30 days to remedy the deficiencies. For additional information on the processing of the application, see Resolution 97-431 as amended by Resolution 98-18 (both attached). If you have any questions, please contact the Comprehensive Planning Section at 239-252-2400. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS I. GENERAL INFOMRATION A. Name of Applicant Howard Isaacson Company Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples Inc. Address 777 Mooring Line Drive City Naples State Florida Zip Code 34102 Phone Number 239-206-3082 Fax Number N/A B. Name of Agent *Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, President/CEO • THIS WILL BE THE PERSON CONTACTED FOR ALL BUSINESS RELATED TO THE PETITION. Company Hole Monies Inc. Address 950 Encore Wax City Naples State Florida Zip Code 34110 Phone Number 239-254-2000 Fax Number 239-254-2099 Name of Agent Richard Yovanovich, Esquire Company Coleman Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. Address 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 City Naples State Florida Zip Code 34103 Phone Number 239-435-3535 Fax Number 239-435-1218 C. Name of Owner (s) of Record See Exhibit "I.C" Warranty Deeds D. Name, Address and Qualifications of additional planners, architects, engineers, environmental consultants and other professionals providing information contained in this application. 1 H:\2006\2006096A\WP\GMPA\3rd Resubmittal\GMPA Application (rev 4-19-2023).doc Packet Pg. 756 9.A.4.c Norman J. Trebilcock, AICP, P.E., President Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, P.A. 1205 Piper Blvd., Suite 202, Naples, FL 34110 Telephone: 239-566-9551 Email: ntrebilcock@trebilcock.biz Marco Espinar Collier Environmental Consultants, Inc. 3211 681h Street SW Naples, FL 34105 Telephone: 239-263-2687 Email: marcoe@prodiciy.net II. Disclosure of Interest Information: See attached Disclosure of Interest Form A. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, Tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest. (Use additional sheets if necessary). Name and Address Percentage of Ownership B. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each. Name and Address Percentage of Stock C. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest. Name and Address Percentage of Interest D. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners. Name and Address Percentage of Ownership E. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners. Name and Address Date of Contract: Percentage of Ownership F. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust. Name and Address G. Date subject property acquired ( ) leased ( ): Term of lease yrs./mos. If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate date of option: and date 2 H:\2006\2006096A\WP\GMPA\3rd Resubmittal\GMPA Application (rev 4-19-2023).doc Packet Pg. 757 9.A.4.c option terminates: , or anticipated closing: H. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. III. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: A. LEGAL DESCRIPTION See Exhibit "I.C" Warranty Deeds B. GENERAL LOCATION The Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples is located on the south side of Oil Well Road, approximately one quarter -mile west of the intersection of Oil Well Road and Everglades Blvd C. PLANNING COMMUNITY Rural Estates D. TAZ 2889 E. SIZE IN ACRES 36± F. ZONING E-Estates G. SURROUNDING LAND USE PATTERN See Exhibit "V.B.1" Future Land Use Mao H. FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION(S) Estates - Mixed Use District Mission Subdistrict IV. TYPE OF REQUEST: A. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN ELEMENT (S) TO BE AMENDED: Housing Element Traffic Circulation Sub -Element Aviation Sub -Element Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element Solid Waste Sub -Element Capital Improvement Element Future Land Use Element Immokalee Master Plan Recreation/Open Space Mass Transit Sub -Element Potable Water Sub -Element NGWAR Sub -Element Drainage Sub -Element CCME Element X Golden Gate Master Plan B. AMEND PAGE(S)15 OF THE Golden Gate Area Master Plan - Rural Golden Estates Sub -Element AS FOLLOWS: (Use Strike thFeuqI4-to identify language to be deleted; Use Underline to identify language to be added). Attach additional pages if necessary: See Exhibit "IV.B.1 " C. AMEND FUTURE LAND USE MAP(S) DESIGNATION FROM Residential Estates Subdistrict to Mission Subdistrict D. AMEND OTHER MAP(S) AND EXHIBITS AS FOLLOWS: (Name & Page #) See Exhibit "IV.D.1" Mixed Use Subdistrict Map E. DESCRIBE ADDITIONAL CHANGES REQUESTED: N/A 3 H:\2006\2006096A\WP\GMPA\3rd Resubmittal\GMPA Application (rev 4-19-2023).doc Packet Pg. 758 9.A.4.c V. REQUIRED INFORMATION: NOTE: ALL AERIALS MUST BE AT A SCALE OF NO SMALLER THAN I"=400'. At least one copy reduced to 8-1/2 x 1 1 shall be provided of all aerials and/or maps. A. LAND USE Exh. V.A.1 Provide general location map showing surrounding developments (PUD, DRI's, existing zoning) with subject property outlined. Exh. V.A.2 Provide most recent aerial of site showing subject boundaries, source, and date. Exh. V.A.3 Provide a map and summary table of existing land use and zoning within a radius of 300 feet from boundaries of subject property. B. FUTURE LAND USE AND DESIGNATION Exh, V.13.1 Provide map of existing Future Land Use Designation(s) of subject property and adjacent lands, with acreage totals for each land use designation on the subject property. C. ENVIRONMENTAL Exh. V.C.1 Provide most recent aerial and summary table of acreage of native habitats and soils occurring on site. HABITAT IDENTIFICATION MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH THE FDOT-FLORIDA LAND USE, COVER AND FORMS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (FLUCCS CODE). NOTE: THIS MAY BE INDICATED ON SAME AERIAL AS THE LAND USE AERIAL IN "A" ABOVE. N/A Provide a summary table of Federal (US Fish & Wildlife Service) and State (Florida Game & Freshwater Fish Commission) listed plant and animal species known to occur on the site and/or known to inhabit biological communities similar to the site (e.g. panther or black bear range, avian rookery, bird migratory route, etc.). Identify historic and/or archaeological sites on the subject property. D. GROWTH MANAGEMENT Reference 9J-11.006, F.A.C. and Collier County's Capital Improvements Element Policy 1.1.2 (Copies attached). INSERT "Y" FOR YES OR "N" FOR NO IN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING: N Is the proposed amendment located in an Area of Critical State Concern? (Reference 9J-11.006(1)(a)(5), F.A.C.). IF so, identify area located in ACSC. N Is the proposed amendment directly related to a proposed Development of Regional Impact pursuant to Chapter 380 F.S. ? (Reference 9J-11.006(1)(a)7.a, F.A.C.) N Is the proposed amendment directly related to a proposed Small Scale Development Activity pursuant to Subsection 163.3187 (1) (c), F.S. ? (Reference 9J-11.006(1)(a)7.b, F.A.C.) N Does the proposed amendment create a significant impact in population which is defined as a potential increase in County -wide population by more than 5% of population projections? (Reference Capital Improvement Element Policy 1.1.2). If yes, indicate mitigation measures being proposed in conjunction with the proposed amendment. Exh. V.D.I Does the proposed land use cause an increase in density and/or intensity to the uses permitted in a specific land use designation and district identified (commercial, industrial, etc.) or is the proposed land use a new land use designation or district? (Reference Rule 9J-5.006(5) F.A.C.). If so, provide data and analysis to support the suitability of land for the proposed use, and of environmentally sensitive land, ground water and natural resources. (Reference Rule 9J-11,007, F.A.C.) 4 H:\2006\2006096A\WP\GMPA\3rd Resubmittal\GMPA Application (rev 4-19-2023).doc Packet Pg. 759 9.A.4.c E. PUBLIC FACILITIES 1. Exh. V.E.1 Provide the existing Level of Service Standard (LOS) and document the impact the proposed change will have on the following public facilities: Exh. V.E.1 Potable Water Exh. V.E.I Sanitary Sewer Exh. V.E.3 Arterial & Collector Roads; Name specific road and LOS See TIS Exh, V.E.1 Drainage Exh. V.E.1 Solid Waste Exh, V.E.I Parks: Community and Regional If the proposed amendment involves an increase in residential density, or an increase in intensity for commercial and/or industrial development that would cause the LOS for public facilities to fall below the adopted LOS, indicate mitigation measures being proposed in conjunction with the proposed amendment. (Reference Capital Improvement Element Objective 1 and Policies) 2. Exh. V.E.2 Provide a map showing the location of existing services and public facilities that will serve the subject property (i.e. water, sewer, fire protection, police protection, schools and emergency medical services. 3. Exh. V.E.I Document proposed services and public facilities, identify provider, and describe the effect the proposed change will have on schools, fire protection and emergency medical services. F. OTHER Identify the following areas relating to the subject property: Exh. V.F.1 Flood zone based on Flood Insurance Rate Map data (FIRM). N Location of wellfields and cones of influence, if applicable. (Identified on Collier County Zoning Maps) Y Traffic Congestion Boundary, if applicable N Coastal Management Boundary, if applicable N High Noise Contours (65 LDN or higher) surrounding the Naples Airport, if applicable (identified on Collier County Zoning Maps). G. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION Y $16,700.00 non-refundable filing fee made payable to the Board of County Commissioners due at time of submittal. (Plus proportionate share of advertising costs) N $9,000.00 non-refundable filing fee for a Small Scale Amendment made payable to the Board of County Commissioners due at time of submittal. (Plus proportionate share of advertising costs) Y Proof of ownership (copy of deed) Y Notarized Letter of Authorization if Agent is not the Owner (See attached form) Y 1 Original and 5 complete, signed applications with all attachments including maps, at time of submittal. After sufficiency is completed, 25 copies of the complete application will be required. If you have held a pre -application meeting and paid the pre -application fee of $500.00 at the meeting, deduct that amount from the above application fee amount when submitting your application. All pre -application fees are included in the total application submittal fee. Otherwise the overage will be applied to future proportionate share advertising costs. * Maps shall include: North arrow, name and location of principal roadways and shall be at a scale of 1 " = 400' or at a scale as determined during the pre -application meeting. 5 H:\2006\2006096A\WP\GMPA\3rd Resubmittal\GMPA Application (rev 4-19-2023).doc Packet Pg. 760 9.A.4.c AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PUDA•PL-20200002198 6 GMPA.PL.2020000220e ►, THOMAS JACKSON (print name), as PRESIDENT .(title, If applicable) of EMMANUELEVANGELICAL LUTHERANCHURCH OFNAPLES,INO• (company, If applicable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) ownerQapplicant=contract purchaser and that; t, I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to Impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions In this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during .normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application:. and that A. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or .subdivided subject to the condltions and restrictions Imposed by the approved action. S. Weil authorize Paula N.c. McMlchael,AICP, RobortJ. Whom, FAICP&Richard Yovanovloh, Foci. to act as ourfmy representative In any matters regarding this petitlon including 1 through 2 above, *Notes: • If the applicant Is a corpomlion, then It Is usually executed by the core, pros, or v, pros, • If the applicant Is a Limited Liability Company (L•L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C,), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." • It the applicant Is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant Is a limited partnermhlp, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general Partner" of the named partnership, • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee", • In each Instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g,, Individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership, Under penalties of perjury, 1 declare that I have read the foregoing:Affldavit of Authorizatiori and that the facts In It are tru SI naturemh rt'as LTackson,Preeident D to Emmanuel Evangelical an Church of Naples, Inc, STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing Instrument was acknoweged before me by means of iner) physical presence or day of 2t�, by (printed name of owner or Such persons) Notary ublic must check applicable box: PAre personally known to me M Has produced a current driver- license Has produced as Id ent atlon. 7c Q Notary Signature; W08-CUA•00I I Si ISS R I; V 31412021) D online notarization this ,pav �NOtit1181fi�7.bllc Bute of Florlde GG Regina Fidler g MYCommi"lonoa1A35a3 �is,w Expires0310712022 Packet Pg. 761 9.A.4.c WARRANTY DEEDS Q d O N N O O O O N O N J d O LO Co ti N N C O d O N N O O O O N O N J a N �L d C� C U d U U m .r a Packet Pg. 762 EXHIBIT "I-C" WARRANTY DEEDS This Instrument Prepared Without Opinion By: Dan Bailey, Attorney at Law 2900 14's Street North, Suite #4 Naples, FL 34109 Grantor's Soc Sec #: Grantee's Soc Sec #: 3864165 OR: 4063 PG: 2982 RICORDIO iD OFFICIAL RICOIDS of COLLIIR COUM, FL 06/29/2006 at 02:57FN DNIGIT 1. BROCK, C6111 COTS 2650000.00 R1C "1 10.50 DOC-.10 11550.00 Reto: ROIIRT R GROTI 3 5125 PARK CENTRAL C7 E NAPLIS FL 34109 0 Above This Line For Recording Warranty Deed (Statutory Form - FS 689.02) This Indenture, made this day of June, 2006, between GLENN E. GRANT, a Married Man, as to Tract 65A, and D. F. MCCARTHY INVESTMENTS II, LLC, AN OHIO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, as to the balance of subject property, Grantor; and ,]EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH OF NAPLES, INC., A FLORIDA NON-PROFIT CORD ] ON, of the State of Florida, whose post office address is '� Grantee; C Witnesseth: That the said Grantor, for and u1 de ration of the sum of $10.00 and other valuable consideration, to Grantor in hand paid by the said Grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby°a o ledged, hereby grants, bargains and sells to the said Grantee, and Grantee's heirs and assigns forever, the follo g described land, to wit: Tract 65A, the North 165 feet of TA an80 and 81, the South 165 feet of the North 330 feet of Tracts 80 and 81, the North 165 feet of the South 330 feet of Tracts d: $1, the South 165 feet of Tracts 80 and 81, and all of Tracts 80A, 81A, 96 and 96A, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, UNIT NO.e,,ahcording to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 7, Page(s) 64, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. l , (For Information Only: Property Appraig?sN'T Identification Numbers are 39896040009, 39897600008, 39897640000,39897520007,39897560009,3909'7S,PIQ4,39897600105,39899120007,39899160009). GRANTOR GLENN E. GRANT, WARRANTS PRESENTS THAT THE PROPERTY BEING CONVEYED IS NOT THE HOMESTEAD PROPERTY, NOR CO' G YOU,S, TO THE HOMESTEAD PROPERTY, OF GRANTOR, GRANTOR'S SPOUSE OR GRANTOR'S CHILDREN, AW- * GRANTOR RESIDES AT 2910 70TH Street SW, Naples, FL 34105, To have and to hold the same in fee simple forever. Together with any and all tenements, hereditaments and appurte� ces thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining including an undivided interest in the common elements and 1, ptl,4,common elements. Subject to easements, restrictions, reservations and limitations of record common to the;sulidiih9i6t� (and condominium, if applicable), zoning and other governmental regulations and taxes for the current year and Wt 5equept years. And the said Grantor does hereby fully wan -ant the title to said land, and will defe the game against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. Wherever used herein, the terms "Grantor" and "Grantee" shall include: a'"e parties to this instrument and the heirs, legal representatives and assigns of individuals, and the successors and assigns of corporati6ns> Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of L09 As to TractSignQYiLf/ %7Sign (Seat) Print .STIA16� [ G941n 9,q u Cr Print GLENN E. GRAN'1%`' WITNESS NO. 1 Si Print D,*, WITNESS NO.2 As to the balance of the subject property: SignJ,4(•�%L(. Print Z/N/),t -I- WITNESS NO. 1 Sign L1.1 �� 6�4 Print ��QrlGo �. cicko an D. F. MCCARTHY INVESTMENTS II, LLC, AN OHIO LIMITED LIABILTY COMPANY, By: Devin F. McCarthy, Its nage Si (Seal) Print Michael P. McName , as Artonrev-in-fact for Devin F. McCarthv WITNESS NO.2 Packet Pg. 763 *** OR; 4063 PG; 2983 *** WARRANTY DEED PAGE TWO STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before the this )It"' day of June, 2006, by Glenn E. Grant, who ( ) is/are person l-7a1Uw to me or who K) has/have produced as identification. NOTARY PUBLIC: Sign Print cx State of FLORIDA at Large NOTARIAL SEAL) Commission expires: Commission No.: f / � Dan Bailey My Commission D0261US Expires February o4 2008 STATE OF OHIO ` COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was aclmowle A,b4n me tbis;%!�e_ day of June, 2006, by Michael P. McNamee, as Attomey-in- Fac evin F. McCarthy, Manager of D.F. MCGART)W,INVESTMENTS II, LLC, an Ohio Limited Liability Company, who (✓) i are personally ]mown or who ( ) has/have produ e as identification. NN> ARY PUBLIC: Stat 40Q �t Large (NOTARIAL SEAL) LINDA S. KELLEY Notary Public and for the State of Ohio 1y Commission Expires „January. 29, 2009 Packet Pg. 764 INSTR 5358104 OR 5354 PG 3154 RECORDED 1/19/2017 9:53 AM PAGES 3 DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA Doc@.70 $5,950.00 REC $27.00 CONS $850,000.00 9.A.4.c CONSIDERATION: $850,000.00 Prepared without opinion of title by: Michael L. Michetti Attorney at Law Woods, Weidenmiller, Michetti, Rudnick & Galbraith, PLLC 9045 Strada Steil Court Fourth Floor Naples, FL 34109 239-325-4070 File Number: 15883 001 Parcel Identification No.'40rI68 003, 4024176004, 39899200008, 3Q8992 0.0, 4024170002 [Space Above This Line For Recording Data) arranty Deed ORY FORM - SECTION 689.02, F.S.) This Indenture made this ZJ dE corporation whose post office address is 76E of Florida, grantor*, and Emmanuel Evang( whose post office address is 777 Mooring grantee*, Witnesseth that said grantor, for and in consideration,,( good and valuable considerations to said grantor in hand has granted, bargained, and sold to the said grantee, and situate, lying and being in Collier County, Florida, to -wit: See attached Exhibit "A". .e-vn 5 et— , 201_,:� between JC Drainfield, Inc., a Florida Blvd., Suite 6, Naples, FL 34104 of the County of Collier, State n Church of Naples, Inc., a Florida not -for -profit corporation Maples, FL 34102 of the County of Collier, State of Florida, of TEN AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($10.00) and other l`grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, rrs and assigns forever, the following described land, Subject to ad valorem taxes for the year 2017 and subsequent jea, ,' o ing, building code and other use restrictions imposed by governmental authority; outstanding oil, gas an ' mineral interests of record if any; and restrictions, reservations and easements common to the subdiviggiio''n;,.prQvided however, that none of them shall prevent use of the property for residential purposes. TOGETHER WITH all the tenements, hereditaments and appurten$�ces<th�reto belonging or in anywise appertaining. 8 t :.,..., TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above described premises, with the appurtenanc:, unto the said grantee, its successors and assigns, in fee simple forever. > and said grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said land, and will defend the same against lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. * "Grantor" and "Grantee" are used for singular or plural, as context requires. DoubleThnee Packet Pg. 765 OR 5354 PG 3155 9.A.4.c In Witness Whereof, grantor has hereunto set grantor's hand and seal the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and deliveredas to both in our presence: State of Florida County of Collier T` The foregoing instrument was acknowlec Craft, President of JC Drainfield, Inc., a or [j has produced a driver's license as i, [Notary Seal] _� — �� ,N. p�:, FRANCES M SCNANER Notary Public -State o1 Florida X CommissionN FF 975610 1, °FF`c My Comm. Expires Jun 26, 2020 Bonded through National Assn. JC Drainfield, Inc., a Flor' a corporation By: ames Craft, President before me this �V_ day of 16 by James i, on behalf of the corporation. He ersonally known to me r ted Name: �j�yg�✓ S �� Ootn�yission Expires: �7 Warranty Deed (Statutory Form) - Page 2 DoubieT!me® Packet Pg. 766 *** OR 5354 PG 3156 *** 9.A.4.c EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description of Property Parcel 1: The West 180 feet of Tract 104, Golden Gate Estates Unit No. 69, according to the map or plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Bookk7, Page 65, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. AND: Parcel 2: The West 75 feet of `the East,,J Sk0 feet of Tract 104, Golden Gate Estates Unit No. 69, according to the map or plat thereof, as rec ed in Plat Book 7, Page 65, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. AND: .: Parcel 3: The East 75 feet of Tract 104, Goklei recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 65, of `t'. AND: Parcel 4: Tract 97, Golden Gate Estates Unit No. 64, 7, Page 64, of the Public Records of Collier AND: Unit No. 69, according to the map or plat thereof, as rds of Collier County, Florida. map or plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book Parcel5: Tract 97A, Golden Gate Estates Unit No. 64, according to.ihe rpa'\or plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 64, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, : Packet Pg. 767 INSTR 4576754 OR 4693 PG 2692 RECORDED 6/21/2011 9:13 AM PAGES 2 DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA DOC@.70 $1,505.00 REC $18.50 CONS $215,000.00 9.A.4.c Prepared by and return to: Conrad Willkomm, Esq. Law Office of Conrad Willkomm, P.A. 590 11th Street South Naples, FL 34102 239-262-5303 File Number: 11R-468 Parcel Identification Nd` 3B 000007 [Space Above This Line For Recording Data] r ' Warranty Deed (STATUTORY FORM - SECTION 689.02, F.S.) This Indenture made this 17th"'ti�y`o 7June, 2011 between Mario Castaneda, a married man, joined by his wife, Aleida Perez Fernandez, whose post o,ce address is 3765 22nd Avenue SE, Naples, FL 34117 of the County of Collier, State of Florida, grantor*, and Emmanuel; glical Lutheran Church, a Florida not for profit corporation, whose post office address is 777 Mooring Line Dri' eaples, FL 34102 of the County of Collier, State of Florida, grantee*, Witnesseth that said grantor, for and in considerat 6a of the sum of TEN AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($10.00) and other good and valuable considerations to said grantor` uc 16iitkp64 by said grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, and sold to the said grante'eaiu&gpantee's heirs and assigns forever, the following described land, situate, lying and being in Collier County, Florida, to w The North 1/2 of Tract 65, Golden Gate Estat "s Unit- o, 64, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 64, Public RecordspColiei<,County, Florida. and said grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said land, and wi1$'defend the same against lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. * "Grantor" and "Grantee" are used for singular oi;pluralAs. Context requires. DoubleTime® Packet Pg. 768 *** OR 4693 PG 2693 *** 9.A.4.c In Witness Whereof, grantor has hereunto set grantor's hand and seal the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed �and �delive our presence: Witness Name: 6'661' .e.-e 2 ame: State of 1 11_ County of The foregoing instrument was acknowledged, Fernandez, who U are personally known orj [Notary Seal] c _(Seal) 4ast eda Aleida erez Fernandez efoire'' me this ay of June, 2011 by Mario Castaneda and Aleida Perez ]iae p3roduced a dri as identification. Notary Pu 'c PN�`'s ov�A`s�G��'� .• r `o ' O� 1 20 r4i'.• #EE 005960 y :74 ' i •• or eandedtih� :�•�••�Q' 1//lit/1111IN O4�'A Name: _LZ'�G�✓l ,yei lit. nmission Expires: Warranty Deed (Statutory Form) - Page 2 Double7ime® Packet Pg. 769 9.A.4.c SUBDISTRICT MAP Q a C9 0 N N Co O O O N O N J a 0 LO Co ti N N C O d O N N O O O O N O N J a •L m U a U U Co Packet Pg. 770 9.A.4.c NOT TO SCALE 950 Encore Way EMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH CHECKED BY : PROJECT No. ling Naples, FL. 34110 COMMUNITY FACILITIES AND PCM 2oosossA DRAWN BY : CAD FILE NAME: HOLE MONTES Certificate offMK SERVICES SUBDISTRICTFlorida DATE : 01/2024 EXHIBIT — ITEM ENGINEERS -PLANNERS•SURVEYORS Authorization No.1772 EXHIBIT IV.D.1 GL—MAP 10 11 12 � U 0 � SUBJECT SITE w w 13 0 15 � 14 18 0 � O � w � w J J m OIL WELL ROAD C.R. 858 m z cn O w Q 22 23 19 w 24 RANDALL BOULEVARD 27 26 25 30 Packet Pg. 771 9.A.4.c LOCATION MAP, AERIAL OVERLAY MAP, ZONING MAP, FUTURE LAND USE MAP, PUBLIC SERVICE FACILITIES MAP & FIRM DATA MAP Packet Pg. 772 9.A.4.c 23 SUBJECT SITE - 3 I =.' n'� lltldF.,7 _. PROJECT LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE LIMITS OF SUBJECT SITE 7— CFPUD2-'EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH OF NAPLES01 E �4 0 0 a 0 aD®o SCAIF IN FEET W m o MISSION SUBDISTRICT COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA "1".NBM o• 5 2019 950 En Core Way Naples, FL. 34110 m Phone: 1239I 2e4-2000 HOLE MONTES Flonda Certificate of ENrNNEEescuaNERHURVEyoes AuthorizationNo.1772 EXHIBIT V.A.1 MISSION SUBDISTRICT LOCATION MAP us: aa,m aao•»: arr xo. x.wxc xo. 02006096A ® . h � 2019 ®p'ar' —"'.'Cy. "5 2019 nofcT xo. 2006096A o 1 OF 1 ¶=N A xAS�NOTED 7 10 26 39 42 55 58 71 74 87 90 11031106[ 18 31 34 47 50 63 66 79 82 125 I I � 13 6 11 22 27 38 43 54 C C3 TAENE 70 75 86 91 E 102 107 124 � � �,219 30 3546 51 62 677883 3 TH 1z3op 5 12 21 28 37 44 53 so 69 U 76 4 85 92 101 108 122 �W 10 20 29 36 45 52 U 61 5 68 77 84 121 i a 9 4 13 20 29 36 45 35 52 H 61 V 68 NU 77 84 .E 93 100 109 120 I C� 8 I � 21 28 37 44 53 s0 69 76 3 85 TH 119 I� 7 3 14 SUBJECT SITE 78 83 94 99 110 118 I I g 22 27 38 43 54 59 70 75 86 19 30 35 46 51 62 117 I I 5 2 15 18 31 34 47 50 63 66 82 95 98 111 115 1161 4 4A 23 26 39 42 55 58 71 74 87 1 A 16A 17A 32A 33A 48A 49A 64A A 0 9 12 113 1 1 3 3A 23A 26A 39A 42A 55A 58A 74A 1 16 17 32 33 48 49 :64S72-h 69112 113 114124 I I 2 25 40 3 41 R 5657723 A EN E E 8' 8g24 25 3 40 S 41 AV 56 N 5 E .E. >�8 $9- 10 05 128 I 16 17 32 33 48 49 ♦ 64 � 80 81 127 � ❑ 15 126 � Packet Pg. 773 9.A.4.c • � 1i I. '',' SUBJECT SITE o OIL WELL RD (S.R. 858) U69 U68 G J m 47 Lu Q J W 31STAVENUE NE w E �o a 0 0 h - IMAGE FROM PLEXEARTH DATED: 2019 - LIMITS OF SUBJECT SITE 5000 0. b d W MISSION SUBDISTRICT °F9 P.N.M. °A 5 2019 �� 950 Encore Way Naples, FL. 34110 EXHIBIT V .A.2 59a0 BF0 mows wa ay..w+o w. 2006096A —M.K. — 52019 ® Qo COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA HOLE MONTES Phone: (239) 254-2000 FloddaCertificateof MISSION SUBDISTRICT AERIAL OVERLAY is"". °" s z0,9 wawa ® �mn N A as NOTED ENGINEEi5NA18gJ2531�VE M ANhorizalion No.1772 2006096A 1 OF 1 Packet Pg. 774 9.A.4.c 10 1,, 1 1b 39 42 1 55 58 1 711 74187 90 103 106 125 11 22 27 38 43 54 3 9 Tc 70 A 75 E N 86 E 91 E 102 107 124 123 12 21 28 37 44 53 60 69 U 76 4 85 92 101 108 I 122 121 13 20 29 36 45 2= 52 u 61 v 68 w i 77 84 i G 93 100 1 109 120 I 1119 I LAND USE ZONING EMMANUEL COMMUNITY PARK, SUBJECT SITE UNDEVELOPED, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL CFPUD, E NORTH STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL E SOUTH SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, 31 STAVE NE E EAST UNDEVELOPED, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL E WEST SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL E ® LIMITS OF SUBJECT SITE aoo o soo SCALe IN rEET CFPUD2,3 EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH OF NAPLES MISSION SUBDISTRICT ..B.M. 2019 �� NaSes.FL.34110 EXHIBIT V.A.3 :n " M.K. °Ans Pho—(239)254-2000 MISSION SUBDISTRICT 2006096A COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA °" 5 2D,9 HOLE MONTES Flonda Certir—te of ENGINE ERS+1MNERS6URVEY0RS Aulhorizalion No.1772 ZONING MAP v2oosossA ncN A NOAS°NNOTED 1 OF Packet Pg. 775 9.A.4.c ESTATES DESIGNATION MIXED USE DISTRICT Residential Estates Subdistrict Conditional Uses Subdistrict Q Neighborhood Center Subdistrict _ Mission Subdistrict - Everglades -Randall Subdistrict COMMERCIAL DISTRICT _ Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict ® Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict AGRICULTURAL / RURAL DESIGNATION Rural Settlement Area District OVERLAYS AND SPECIAL FEATURES ®Southern Golden Gate Estates Natural Resource Protection Area Overlay W ® MISSION SUBDISTRICT o o COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA RURAL GOLDEN GATE AREA FUTURE LAND USE MAP "M 950 Encore Way EXHIBIT V. B.1 gym anew �� Naples, FL 34110 2006096A Phone: (2391254-2000 MISSION SUBDISTRICT HOLE MON TES Florida Certificate of FUTURE LAND USE MAP a�a�.aa aE.ao. ENGINEERPLANNERS&RVEYORS Authorization NoA 72 ,F 2006096A t OF 1 Packet Pg. 776 9.A.4.c PUBLIC SERVICE FACILITIES NOTES 1. POLICE PROTECTION IS PROVIDED BY COLLIER COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE. 2. FIRE PROTECTION IS PROVIDED BY NORTH COLLIER FIRE CONTROL & RESCUE. 3. THERE ARE NO WELL FIELDS WITHIN OR IN CLOSE PROXIMITYTO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. PUBLIX SERVICE FACILITIES LEGEND I. -SCHOOL O - SHERIFF / FIRE DEPARTMENT - LIMITS OF SUBJECT SITE NORTH COLLIER =SCUE STATION N. T.S Packet Pg. 777 9.A.4.c ENVIRONMENTAL DATA REPORT Packet Pg. 779 9.A.4.c EXHIBIT V.C.1 EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH OF NAPLES ENVIRONMENTAL DATA REPORT P h A 0 1 1 �� I/�t- �� REVISED APRIL 19, 2022 COLLIER ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, INC. 3211 68TH STREET SW NAPLES, FL 34105 239-263-2687 Packet Pg. 780 9.A.4.c 3.08.00 Environmental Data Purpose As per requirements in LDC Sections 3.08.00 and questions in the CU Checklist Preparation Of Environmental Data Preparation of Environmental Data, Environmental Data Submittal Requirement shall be prepared by an individual with academic credentials and experience in the area of environmental science or natural resource management. Academic credentials and experience shall be a bachelor's or higher degree in one of the biological sciences with at least two years of ecological or biological professional experience in the State of Florida Qualifications of Environmental Consultant Collier Environmental Consultants Inc. 2/96 - Present 3211 681h Street SW Naples, Florida 34105 Marco A. Espinar- Biologist Resume included as an exhibit. Environmental Data. The following shall be submitted where applicable to evaluate projects. A) Wetlands i) Identify on Current Aerial / the location of all Collier County / SFWMD Jurisdictional wetlands according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System FLUCFCS A FLUCFCS map and vegetation inventory has been included. The site consists of approximately 36 acres. The site consists primarily of pasture lands. These are Golden Gate Estates lots. The site also has three borrow pits two of which may have been for cattle grazing. These parcels were cleared decades ago, prior to any Land Development Codes. The site is FLUCC'ed as 211 Pasture. In addition, there are a few borrow pits. These parcels do not contain any native habitat. There are a few pockets of native secondary growth. There is an area labeled 411 Pine flatwoods. This pocket is vegetated with Slash pines, cabbage palm, palmetto and Brazilian pepper. Aerials depicting FLUCCS codes, and a vegetation inventory are included as exhibits. Packet Pg. 781 9.A.4.c B) Listed Species and Bald Eagle Nests and Nest Protection Zones i) Provide a wildlife survey for the nests of bald eagle and for listed species known to inhabit biological communities similar to those existing on site. The survey shall be conducted in accordance with the guidelines or recommendations of the FFWCC and the USFWS. Survey times may be reduced or waived where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low as determined by the FFWCC and USFWS. Where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low, the survey time may be reduced or waived by the County Manager or designee. Wildlife Listed Species Study (LDC 10.02.3.A.2.m) A brief examination of these parcels found no listed plant and/or animals on site. The site does not provide any functional habitat for wildlife. A listed species study was conducted and is attached. No listed vertebrate species were found. The site is fenced and cross fenced and surrounded by roadway and single- family lots. This limits any animal movement. Any utilization is limited to birds and small mammals. This project site is in secondary panther zone. This project meets the Objective of CCME Objective 7.1 The area proposed to be impacted consists of lower grade habitat. No listed species should be impacted by this development. CCME OBJECTIVE 7.1: Direct incompatible land uses away from listed animal species and their habitats. (The County relies on the listing process of State and Federal agencies to identify species that require special protection because of their endangered, threatened, or species of special concern status. Listed animal species are those species that the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission has designated as endangered, Packet Pg. 782 9.A.4.c ii) Provide Listed Plants identified in LDC Section 3.04.03 See Attached Vegetation List / FLUCCS Code Map iii) Wildlife Management Plans in accordance with LDC Section 3.04.00 See Attached Listed Species Study. A Black bear management plans may be required at the time of SDP. C) Native Vegetation Preservation i) For Sites or Portions of Sites Cleared of Native Vegetation or in Agricultural Use: This parcel has been cleared and was in prior agricultural use. A historical aerial dated 1984 and 1995 has been included. ii) Identify on a current aerial the acreage, location and community types of all upland and wetland habitats on the project site, according to the FLUCFCS system and provide a legend foe each of the FLUCFS codes identified. Aerials and overlay information must be legible at the scale provided. Provide calculations for the acreage of native vegetation required to be retained on site. Include the above referenced calculations and aerials on the SDP or PPL. In a separate report, demonstrate how the preserve criteria pursuant to LDC section 3.05.07 have been meet. Location Maps / Aerials (LDC10.02.3.A.2.m) Aerials and location maps have been provided. The Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples consists of approximately 36 acres and is located in Section 19, Township 48, Range 28, in Collier County. This project is located just west of the intersection of Oil well Road and Everglades Blvd. This property was rezoned by Ordinance 11-23 and an insubstantial change to the PUD was approved by HEX Decision 2015-49. The CFPUD allows for 90,000 sf of uses, including a 1,000 - seat church and related social services, a 300 - person day care facility, job training and vocational rehabilitation services, a 450 - person private school or, as an alternative to the church and its ancillary uses, development of ten (10) single family dwelling units. Accessary uses allowed include recreational facilities and garden plots. The site has been developed with an athletic field in the northwest corner. The proposed amendment adds approximately 14 acres to the PUD and allows church - related uses over the entire acreage of 36 acres. The prosed intensity would be reduced from a 300 - person daycare to a 200 - person daycare and add up to 3,600 sq ft of Packet Pg. 783 9.A.4.c medical office and 300 university/college students. The other development parameters remain the same. There is a companion Growth Management Plan Amendment to add the additional acreage to the Mission Subdistrict of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. See Attached Location Maps, Vegetation Maps / FLUCCS Maps Native Vegetation Calculation (LDC3.05.07.A.) 3.05.07 Preservation Standards This site does not have any native habitat. The removal of native vegetation happened prior to any development regulation. This site was at one time cleared and farmed in row crops. It was then utilized for cattle grazing. These are now platted Golden Gate Estate lots. Historical aerials have been provided. There is some secondary growth that has occurred on site. This is primary along the outer boundaries of the project. One such area is along Oil Well Road. This is an area with Slash pines (411). The midstory also has some palmetto and cabbage palms. This (411) is approximately 0.26 acres in size. This area will be preserved. This will be consistent with Goal 6 of Collier County GMP's Objective 6.1 Protect native communities through the application of minimum preservation requirements. Clearly identify the location of all preserves The site has no native habitat. Soil Ground Water Sampling Natural Site This site is not near any well Fields. An exhibit showing Collier County well field protection zones as been included. Packet Pg. 784 9.A.4.c Q d Iq O N N O O O O N O N J d O LO Co ti N N C O d O N N O O O O N O N J a N �L d C� C U d U U m t K W r C d E t R .r a Packet Pg. 7 57 9.A.4.c Marco A. Espinar 3211 68"' St SW Naples, Fl 34105 EDUCATION Bilingual: English & Spanish Office: 239-263-2687 Home 239-263-2747 Cardinal Mooney High School Diploma 1980 Sarasota, Florida Manatee Junior College AA Degree 1982 Bradenton, Florida Biology University of South Florida BS Degree 1990 Tampa, Florida Biology Completed USF Cooperative Education Program April 1988 USF Underaraduate Research - USF 1985 Apalachicola Archaeological Expedition & Research - Lab Coordinator of Fauna Identification hom Archeological Sites - Studies of Seagrass Beds (Thalassia testudinum) in Upper Tainpa Bay, Florida - Growth Rates of Marine Algae ( Gracilaria tikvahiae, G. verrucosa, G. deblis ) Port Manatee, Florida EMPLOYMENT HISTORY & EXPERIENCE Collier Environmental Consultants Inc. Naples, Florida 2/96 - Present Environmental Permitting, Planning Vegetation Inventory Mitigation & Monitoring Plans Threatened and Endangered Species Survey Licensed Agent Gopher Tortoise Permitting, Testing, Relocation Owner & Environmental Planning / Biologist Exotic Plant Removal / Poisoning Mitigation Plantings Jurisdictional Determination Environmental Impact Statements Red Cockaded Woodpecker Survey UMAM Analysis BP- Natural Resource Advisor - Deepwater Horizon MS Canyon 252 Oil Spill Gulfport, Mississippi - Dauphin Island, Alabama - Pensacola, Florida Packet Pg. 786 9.A.4.c Turrell & Associates, Inc. Naples, Florida 2/94 - 12/9S Environmental Permitting, Planning Threatened and Endangered Species Survey Environmental Impact Statements Senior Environmental Planner Supervision of Staff Review Staff Reports South Florida Water Management District Environmental Analyst Fort Myers, Florida 2/93 - 8/93 Dredge & Fill Permit Review Surface Water Permit Review Collier County Government Development Services Environmental Specialist II Naples, Florida 10/90 — 2/93 Site Development Plan Compliance Planned Unit Development Compliance Site Drainage Inspections Southwest Florida Water Management District Tampa, Florida 9/87 —10/90 Landscape Inspections Environmental Enforcement Field Services Technician As -Built Inspections of Storm Water System - Engineering, Survey Surface and Ground Water Permit Compliance Well Construction & Abandonment Inspections Southwest Florida Water Management District (CO-OP) Environmental Scientists 1 Brooksville, Florida 1/86 - 9/87 Wetland Vegetation Studies At Major Well Fields Water Quality Sampling & Testing PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS Southwest Florida Association of Environmental Professionals, Member Elected to very First Governing Board and served 2 terms, served on founding association — Bylaws Committee Appointed by the Board of County Commissioners and Served on the Collier County Environmental Advisory Board Appointed by the Board of County Commissioners and Currently Serving on the Development Services Advisory Committee Packet Pg. 787 9.A.4.c LOCATION MAPS a a C9 0 N N Co O O O N O N J a 0 Lo Co ti N N C O d O N N O O O O N O N J a •L m U a U U Co Packet Pg. 7 8771 9.A.4.c { LOCATION - ` Labels Drawing a Points Drawing a Winchester Head Lines Drawing •, s � Polygons Drawing _ $ - Selected Custom Parcels County Boundaries ., Palmetto Rfdgu -. 1 ■ H9h.SchooE — -:Od1N I R id t■— - Cottle, Co,nly 7 EI even Sheriffs Ofte �bstatoGainn DE, tstriatttes - �iOSO I .4 li i'■ .. - Ro.dnu ecwere.d a�d,tn eaweYaro - COLLIER = R,;nme eo�u:r�ro !s pharmacy j s II �pppi; Sabal Palm Elomontary � 6 I I Ma Wise 2020 Copyright 2020 MapWise, Inc. All rights reserved, www.mapwise.com. This map is Informational only. No representation is made or warranty given as to its content. User assumes all risk of use. MapWise and its suppliers assume no responsibility for any losses resulting from such use. 0 0.5 1 1.5 mi :1 Iq O N N 0 O O O N O N J (L O W) 00 ti v N C .N m O N N O O O O N O N J a N CC U a U U Ib il Packet Pg. 789 ,011P W,�.�: yV'i d i i- i y .".-'S! t ;'• r� 35Tit FiV�E,�NE r �35THAVE NEB ,c,• �=.."� .. .i.., `` .""'""_ _' OIL WELL RD,�m.,w.,,,�m.,,".m, OIL WELL R0 ,,,,,,,,,4..,.,," 33RDIAVE NEB - V• } STiAVE NE is y r I t r b 29TH AVE NEI,1 29TWAVE NE W. ieomt —mm27TH'A'JENE��"s: _ I of ! 9.A.4.c R 3 C R E TLUCCS MAP / VEGETATION INVENTORY W a a C9 0 N N Co O O O N O N J a 0 LO Co ti N N C O d O N N O O O O N O N J a •L m U a U U Co Packet Pg. 791 9.A.4.c FLUCCS CODE AND VEGETATION INVENTORY FLUCCS CODE (Description) Common Name Scientific Name III Single Family Home Currently used as an office 180 Recreational Play field 211 Pasture (Cleared) Indicator Status This is the dominate habitat on site. This is an area totally cleared and was historically farmed in row crops. The clearing occurred prior to any regulation. The area is currently vegetated with disturbed and pioneer plant species. There are scattered pockets of cabbage palms, palmetto and Brazilian pepper. This area is fenced and cross -fenced and at one point this was used for cattle grazing. There are a few Slash pines, cabbage palms and ear leaf acacia along the perimeter with Oil Well Road. Slash pine Pinus elliotti FACW Ear leaf acacia Acacia auriculiformis Exotic Palmetto Serona repens FACU Running oak Quercus pumila UPL Live oak Quercus virginiana FACU Myrsine Myrsine floridana FAC Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolius Exotic Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto FAC wax myrtle Myrica cerifera FAC+ beakrush Rhynchospora microcarpa FACW+ Bahiagrass Paspalum notatum FACU Sandspur Cenchrus echinatus FAC Broom sedge Andropogon glomeratus FACW Sedge Cyperus ligularis FACW Dog Fennel Eupatorium capillifolium FACU pennywort Hydrocotyle spp. FACW mat lippa Phyla nodiflora FACW Guineagrass Panicum maximum FAC- Lantana Lantana camara FACU Ragweed Ambrosia artemisiifolia FACU Whitehead broom Spermacoce verticillata FAC Caesar weed Urena lobata FACU Chocolate weed Melochia corchorifolia FAC Packet Pg. 792 9.A.4.c 411 Pine Flatwoods This is a small 0.26 acre habitat located along Oil Well Road. This area is vegetated with Slash pines with palmetto as ground cover. Other species such as cabbage palms are also present 742 Borrow Area Other Surface Waters This are consisting of three different borrow pits. One is next to the current parking. The other two were at one time used as cattle ponds. Torpedo grass Panicum repens Nuisance Cattails Typha spp OBL Carolina willow Salix caroliniana OBL primrose willow Ludwigia peruviana OBL 8144 Roads and Highway — Oil Well Road INDICATOR STATUS - Obligate (OBL), Facultative wet plants (FACW), Facultative plants (FAC), Upland (UPL) Packet Pg. 793 9.A.4.c 3 E E O U t L U c L J R 7 C R E E W Q d 0 N N O O O 0 N O N J a 0 LO Co ti N N C O d O N N 0 O O O N 0 N J a N �L d C� C U d U U m t K W r C d E t R .r a Packet Pg. 7 47 9.A.4.c SOILS Q a C9 0 N N Co O O O N O N J a 0 LO 0 ti N N C O d O N N O O O O N O N J a •L m U a U U Co Packet Pg. 7 57 9.A.4.c COLLIER' SOIL'LEGEND REVISED 1190 H. YAMATAKI HYDRIC H 2 H 3 H 4 H H H H H H H H H `1 H H H H H H H H H G 7 8 10 11 14 15 1G 17 18 20 21 22 23 25 27 28 29 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 45 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 5.6 HOLOPAW FS, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM MALABAR FS. CHOBEE, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM AND DANIA MUCKS DEPRESSIONAL RIVIERA,--LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM-COPELAND FS IMMOKALEE FS MYAKKA FS OLDSMAR FS, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM HALLANDALE FS PINEDA FS, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM POMELLO FS OLDSMAR FS BASINGER FS .RIVIERA FS, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM FT. DRUM- AND-MALABAR-:-HIGH-. FS BOCA FS CHOBEE, WINDER AND GATOR-SOILS, DEPRESSIONAL HOLOPAW AND OKEELANTA SOILS DEPRESSIONAL BOCA, RIVIERA, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM AND COPELAND FS DEPRESSIONAL HOLOPAW FS PINEDA AND RIVIERA FS WABASSO FS HILOLO LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM, JUpITER AND MARGATE SOILS URBAN LAND � URBAN LAND +OLOPAW BASINGER COMPLEX URBAN LAND �MMOKALEE OLDSMAR LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM COMPLEX URBAN LAND AQUENTS COMPLEX ORGANIC SUBSTRATUM UDORTHENTS SHAPED TUSCAWILLA FS URBAN LAND MATLACHA LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM! BOCA COMPLEX SATELLITE F�, DUBBIN AND WULFERT MUCKS URBAN LAND SATELLITE COMPLEX -CANAVERAL BEACHES ASSOCIATION WINDER, RIV ERA-, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM -'. AND CHOBEE SOIL DEPRESSIONAL PAOLA FS (1-8 percent slopes) PENNSUCCO SOIL (marl prairie) HALLANDALE AND BOCA- FS (slough) OCHOPEE FSL,I PRAIRIE (marl) OCHOPEE FSL KESSON MUCK FREQUENTLY FLOODED ESTERO AND PECKISH SOILS FREQUENTLY_FLObDED JUPITER BOCA COMPLEX BASINGER FS, OCCASIONALLY%FLOODED Packet Pg. 796 9.A.4.c Copyright 2020 MapWise, Inc. All rights reserved. www.mapwise.com. This map is informational only. No representation is made or warranty given as to Its content. User assumes all risk of use. MapWise and its suppliers assume no responsibility for any losses resulting from such use. SOILS Labels Drawing Points Drawing Lines Drawing Polygons Drawing Selected Custom Parcels Streets OSM Hybrid County Boundaries Parcel Outlines Soils Boundaries 0 340 680 1020 ft Packet Pg. 797 IM 9.A.4.c HISTORICAL AERIAL Ile O N N O O O O N O N J d Co .r a Packet Pg. 799 9.A.4.c Copyright 2020 MapWise, Inc. All rights reserved. www.mapwise.com. This map is informational only. No representation is made or warranty given as to Its content. User assumes all risk of use. MapWise and its suppliers assume no responsibility for any losses resulting from such use. HISTORICAL AERIAL 1995 Labels Drawing Points Drawing Lines Drawing Polygons Drawing Selected Custom Parcels County Boundaries IV Parcel outlines rlv 0 340 680 1020 ft Packet Pg. 80, 9.A.4.c SITE / MASTER PLAN Q a C9 0 N N Co O O O N O N J a 0 LO 0 ti N N C O d O N N O O O O N O N J a •L m U a U U Co Packet Pg. 8 2 O.R. 4703 PG. 2424 _-J — --- ---' __—_—__--- ?l Wide Type'D'_—_—_—_—_1—_ _R.OWTAKEundscane P ^---._ I � R AD - -_ LIIRVRO Mae _ ac - - �-- �� '�_� 1-�5n �caPe der—___� --_ I ----- — — — — 20' Wide -- 6'HIGHWALL _ ----- — —� 7F :: rBACK Type'D' 75'SETBACK I �_ _ - -� Landscap PdvateRoad way 111 ( •dls 4 � _ LAKE— Buffer ; Easement I 1.01 So II , i / / 25' Wlde Type'B' l Landscape Buffer ! . ' � ! j - Potential Food Truck Parking Area 1 1 — 6' HIGH WALL 75' SETBACK+I / j it I n Im t 1 m�w m 1 14 iY 30� LAKE o 0 c 25' Wide Type'B' scam ree� N J E Landscape Buffer I i hinn 75' wide Setback within 1 1 ❑ PRESERVE 75'SETBACK' �- tale Ac.:1 Zoned: E Estates LAKE POTENTIAL FOODTRUCK (Land Use Is Single Family and Vacant) DI x I PARKING AREA ImNI v imN1 ,F • I m m 3I Zoned: E Estates (Land Use is Vacant) LAND USE SUMMARY 25' Wide Type'B' Acres Percentage 1 H Landscape Buffer 75' SETBACK N 51 Development Area 23.58 65.65% ! _ _ _ _=n75�wide Setback Landscape Buffers/ Setback 5.07 14.11 % Zoned: E Estates (Land 1 I Sports Fields 1.32 3.67 % Development Intensity Use is Single Family and S P p y per Sec. D of CFPUD 1 Lake 5.69 15.81 % I 1- Preserve Area 0.26 0.75 % • Maximum total floor area = 90,000 s.f. -- • 75'sETBACK 1 LAKE Total 35,92 100.00 % Maximum Principal Structure Height 1 I • Zoned height = 30 feet maximum 75'SETBACK 1 • Actual height = 38 feet maximum for all structures Minimum Open Space Required/ Provided: other than Worship Center 1 35.92 Acres X 30% = 10.78 Acres Worship Center ❑t Im = a Preserves can be used to meet L.D.0 required landscape • Zoned height = 35 feet maximum am m I4 1 • Actual height buffer in accordance with section 2.8 of the CFPUD. ght = 42 feet maximum N Lakes shown are conceptual and may change during the Deviations I SDP process. .3 1-1 See list of Requested Deviations 1 Minimum Native Vegetation Required/ Provided = I 1 1.7 Acres x 15% = 0.26f Acres NOTES: zD' wide Ty�pe'D' ' All stacking shall occur within the development with no impacts on Oil Well Road for all uses. 1 Bisrave. rve EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL w^� Ra*s.F .11O3 w Nenles,FL34110 EXHIBIT �sosscMPos ass?-1 LUTHERAN CHURCH n HM:0 e'(T39°25920de '"�a"n� ':N,o r Fl rMaC Nlkate °I C.F.P.U.D. MASTER PLAN HOLE MONTES Authorl]ali°n N°.1T/2 �-.::::::::�2006.096AJ 1 OF 1 Packet Pg. 803 9.A.4.c The Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples LISTED SPECIES SURVEY Collier County, Florida January 2021 Prepared By: Collier Environmental Consultants, Inc. 3211 68" Street SW Naples, Florida 34105 (239) 263 - 2687 Packet Pg. 804 9.A.4.c INTRODUCTION: This report is an account of a Listed wildlife and plants species survey recently performed on 36 acre tract called The Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples. Its purpose is to identify and describe key habitats and report any listed species using the site that would be at risk due to possible future development actions on the site. This survey and report is based on fieldwork performed during January 2021. DESCRIPTION: The Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples consists of approximately 36 acres and is located in Section 19, Township 48, Range 28, in Collier County. This parcel is located just west of the intersection of Oil Well Road and Everglades Blvd. These are numerous Golden Gate Estates lots. The following is a habitat breakdown. See Exhibit # 1 - Location Map FLUCCS HABITAT ill Single Family Home 180 Recreational 211 Pasture 411 Pine Flatwoods 742 Burrow Pit 8144 Roadway LISTED SPECIES SURVEY: The required survey for a Listed Species Survey calls for a survey covering 100 % of the site, at prescribed transect distances per site acreage. Such a survey was conducted in January 2021. Established transects were oriented north - south and east - west and superimposed on an aerial map of the site. The site was examined via straight and meandering transects with periodic stationary observations. These transects were conducted Early morning (0730 - 1000), mid -day (1100 - 1500) and late -day (1500 - 1800) time periods. This survey was conducted daily for several days. Some transects were interrupted by seasonal rains. All possible species of plants and animals listed by state and federal agencies were noted. In addition, to the transects walked stationary observation was periodically utilized. Careful observations noting calls, tracks, scat, roosting and nest sites were conducted. Packet Pg. 805 9.A.4.c RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Listed Flora Refer to Exhibit # 2 - Cumulative Plant List Listed Fauna A description of the wildlife found onsite is provided below. Refer to Exhibit # 3 - Wildlife Species Observed Key Species Discussion: Taking into account the location and condition of the property and State and Federal listed species that could be found on or around the site include: Florida Black Bear No individuals were observed during this survey even though Black bears are known to inhabit the general area. Special attention was given for signs such as scraps, tracks and scat. This mammal has a large home range and is known to inhabit the area. Bonneted Bat The Florida bonneted bat is the largest species of bat in Florida. Previously known as the Florida (Wagner's) mastiff bats these bats were reclassified as a separate species unique to Florida. The species can grow to a length of 6.5 inches with a wingspan of 20 inches. This is a flying mammal free to traverse great distances. This parcel has very few trees and/or cabbage palms. During this survey trees were examined for cavities. None were found. This project is not anticipated to negatively impact the species. Florida Panther No individuals have been documented utilizing this project site or identified during this survey. This species does have a large home range and is known to inhabit Golden Gate Estates and surrounding areas. The site is located within the Secondary Panther Zone. Gopher Tortoise This site does offer some areas of suitable habitat for Gopher tortoise. Searches were keyed in areas with spoil material (mound). However, no signs or burrows were Packet Pg. 806 9.A.4.c identified on the subject parcels. CONCLUSION: Transects were walked throughout the entire parcel. Stationary observations were also done through prime habitat areas. All Tansects were walked at varying times from post - dawn & mid -day to pre -sunset hours. This site has no native habitat. This parcel is entirely cleared. This was a historical farm field, later used for cattle grazing. This site is extremely limited as wildlife habitat / utilization. The site is surrounded by single family homes and a busy roadway. These parcels are also fenced and cross fenced. These fences impede wildlife movement. All these limitations hinder wildlife utilization and movement. Signs of small animal usage such as armadillo were readily visible. Several species of songbirds were seen traversing the site. No listed animal species or signs thereof were identified on the property. Packet Pg. 807 9.A.4.c Vertebrates - Threatened, Endangered and Species of Special Concern Species Black bear Florida panther Everglades mink Big Cypress Fox squirrel Bonneted Bat Indigo snake American alligator Gopher tortoise Gopher Frog Present Absent x x x x x Southeastern American kestrel x Red -Cockaded woodpecker x Florida Scrub Jay x Wood stork x Snail kite x Bald eagle x Limpkin x Osprey x White ibis x Tricolored heron x Snowy egret x Reddish egret x Little blue heron x Listed Vegetation Tillandsia spp. x Packet Pg. 808 li Winchestor lioai T ■Palmell. Pidyc : IIphJ IKu:. I ■' "Mor counly Ivan Sheff's office W.I' Golden Gem Es:alas - Sdhstat:on Gislncl z- 4 li jC li �■ T.:Krd�el BaeluYivA C(5a"i"►ER .HOIIyHI BOnIBt"lily Hnn]LL Bn�ticrnrl IS PMrmncy II s +I l xi $: renal Palm Elemw;iary M,A-e Wth. it nl fl i MaaWise 2020 Copyright 2020 MapWise, Inc. All rights reserved, www.mapwise.com. This map is informational only. No representation is made or warranty given as to its content. User assumes all risk of use. MapWise and its suppliers assume no responsibility for any losses resulting from such use. LOCATION Labels Drawing Points Drawing Lines Drawing Polygons Drawing Selected Custom Parcels County Boundaries 0 0.5 1 1.5 mi Packet Pg. 809 9.A.4.c Copyright 2020 MapWise, Inc. All rights reserved, www,mapwise.com. This map is informational only. No representation is made or warranty given as to its content. User assumes all risk of use. MapWise and its suppliers assume no responsibility for any losses resulting from such use. LOCATION Labels Drawing Points Drawing m` Lines Drawing Polygons Drawing Selected Custom Parcels Streets MapWise County Boundaries Parcel Outlines 0 680 1360 2040 it Packet Pg. 810 9.A.4.c 3 E E O U t L U c L J R 7 C R E E W Q d 0 N N O O O 0 N O N J d 0 LO Co ti N N C O d O N N 0 O O O N 0 N J a N �L d C� C U d U U m t K W r C d E t R .r a Packet Pg. 811 9.A.4.c FLUCCS CODE AND VEGETATION INVENTORY FLUCCS CODE (Description) Common Name Scientific Name 111 Single Family Home Currently used as an office 180 Recreational Play field 211 Pasture (Cleared) Indicator Status This is the dominate habitat on site. This is an area totally cleared and was historically farmed in row crops. The clearing occurred prior to any regulation. The area is currently vegetated with disturbed and pioneer plant species. There are scattered pockets of cabbage palms, palmetto and Brazilian pepper. This area is fenced and cross fenced and at one point this was used for cattle grazing. There are a few Slash pines, cabbage palms and ear leaf acacia along the perimeter with Oil Well Road. Slash pine Pinus elliotti FACW Ear leaf acacia Acacia auriculiformis Exotic Palmetto Serona repens FACU Running oak Quercus pumila UPL Live oak Quercus virginiana FACU Myrsine Myrsine. loridana FAC Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolius Exotic Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto FAC wax myrtle Myrica cerifera FAC+ beakrush Rhynchospora microcarpa FACW+ Bahiagrass Paspalum notatum FACU Sandspur Cenchrus echinatus FAC Broom sedge Andropogon glomeratus FACW Sedge Cyperus ligularis FACW Dog Fennel Eupatorium capill folium FACU pennywort Hydrocotyle spp. FACW mat lippa Phyla nodiflora FACW Guineagrass Panicum maximum FAC- Lantana Lantana camara FACU Ragweed Ambrosia artemisiifolia FACU Whitehead broom Spermacoce verticillata FAC Caesar weed Urena lobata FACU Chocolate weed Melochia corchorifolia FAC Packet Pg. 812 9.A.4.c 411 Pine Flatwoods This is a small 0.26 acre habitat located along Oil Well Road. This area is vegetated with Slash pines with palmetto as ground cover. Other species such as cabbage palms are also present 742 Borrow Area Other Surface Waters This are consisting of three different borrow pits. One is next to the current parking. The other two were at one time used as cattle ponds. Torpedo grass Panicum repens Nuisance Cattails Typha spp OBL Carolina willow Salix caroliniana OBL primrose willow Ludwigia peruviana OBL 8144 Roads and Highway — Oil Well Road INDICATOR STATUS - Obligate (OBL), Facultative wet plants (FACW), Facultative plants (FAC), Upland (UPL) Packet Pg. 813 9.A.4.c WILDLIFE SPECIES OBSERVED Common Name Amphibian & Reptiles: American alligator Birds: Dove- ground Vulture, turkey Vultue, Black Boat -tailed Grackle Red winged blackbird Bluejay Gray catbird Northern mockingbird Mammals: Nine -banded armadillo species Alligator mississippiensis Columbina passerina Cathartes aura Coragyps atratus Quiscalus major Agelaius phoeniceus Cyanocitta cristata Dumetella carolinensis Mimus polyglottos Dasypus novemcinctus Status Packet Pg. 814 9.A.4.c TRANSECTS WALKED + i a rt 1 c Labels Drawing + t a " r Points Drawing 0 Lines Drawing Polygons Drawing Selected Custom Parcels Streets OSM Hybrid County Boundaries " Parcel Outlines Copyright 2020 MapWise, Inc. All rights reserved. www.mapwise.com. This map is informational only. No representation is made or warranty given as to its content. User assumes all risk of use. MapWise and its suppliers assume no responsibility for any losses resulting from such use. 0 330 660 990 it Packet Pg. 815 9.A.4.c WELL FIELDS Q a C9 0 N N O O O O N O N J a 0 LO 0 ti N N C O d O N N O O O O N O N J a •L m U a U U Co Packet Pg. 816 Collier County Well Field Protection Zones 2010 9.A.4.c Well Field Protection Zones W -1 Zone = 1 Year Travel Time Isocontour W - 2 Zone = 2 Year Travel Time Isocontour W - 3 Zone = 5 Year Travel Time Isocontour W - 4 Zone = 20 Year Travel Time Isocontour I I I I 1 1 i Miles 0 2 4 8 Lee County j i J_I I q- i -- OrangetreeWell Field Lee County Collier County Utilities t t ; ' /-. �•j`� �; ~IC 1 , �I Golden Gat e - A II •I ii•,j% i -- Well Field r ,,jj -✓ / - - T it "t - /r I i �t � it' i ~ _ I t � ! I } � % �. ' i �4 ,jll'.i• j ' ,r�Fll iii'�t !1 I I --rirt ililt��ti. .ili ff iiiiillJf ( City of Naples Coastal 7,Ft Iii�r !♦�, t�-•''rai Ridge Well Field 17 titi.-�__�' i �t j _'� - I li ♦~ 7 f Immokalee ( ! Wall Field ! Ave Maria Well Field �^u i � i 1 City of Naples East Golden Gate Well Field % f ' f F ht _i i '�- r- � t Collier County Utilities ------� t (.-_, Golden Gate - I Well Field - ;1,— I Florida Governmental Utility Authority •` Golden Gate City / -- Well Field y - - - — -- qj ljIll N , W Everglade 1 Well Field —Al tlf f- t f + , - Port of the Islands Well Field crs/cina"rp„asartoA �.\�, `'i \\ i Mao i rIU xaW N.D Won��e106 Y4iti,AT�.r 1 Packet Pg. 817 9.A.4.c r E SUPPLEMENTAL NARRATIVE E 0 U t c> L A R 3 C R E E W Q a C9 0 N N Co O O O N O N J a 0 LO Co ti N N C O d O N N O O O O N O N J a •L m U a U U Co Packet Pg. 818 9.A.4.c Emmanual Lutheran Church Community Facilities and Services Subdistrict and Emmanuel Lutheran Church Community Facilities CFPUD Supplemental Narrative With respect to providing additional justification for increasing the size of the Subdistrict (by 14.2 acres), as we discussed, the 14.2 acres were donated to the Church for the purpose of providing a sufficient campus size to accommodate future growth and the ability to continue and advance the mission of providing both church facilities and a variety of community services on the campus, as the population of this area of the Country continues to grow. The process to begin the addition of the noted parcels to the existing CFPUD and Mission Subdistrict commenced in 2017 with the engagement of DPZ CoDesign to host multiple charrettes resulting in a conceptual plan for the site, based upon "community needs", rather than the "church's needs". Thus, the transformation of the original vision of a megachurch with asphalt parking and church related permissions to a community services site, hosting multiple not -for -profit Collier -based entities bringing their services and expertise to an underserved community. In response to staff s position that the Mobile Food Dispensing Vehicles (MFDV), aka food truck use, can only be supported as an accessory use; respectfully, we disagree, and we intend to keep this use as a permitted principal use subject to the conditions proposed in the CFPUD and LDC Sec. 5.05.16. The intention is that the use may be permitted before the church or other principal uses have been established and the operating hours will not be further limited to those of other principal uses. The ability to host food trucks, whether to serve users of the fields and playgrounds, congregants before or after worship, or the community in conjunction with Meals of Hope or Harry Chapin meets a tremendous need of the community. Food trucks will reduce rather than increase traffic, increase the quality of life, and optimize the flexibility of the site, providing services only when needed rather than being a permanent, fixed investment with high sunk costs. It should also be mentioned that mention that there are several not -for -profit food trucks in Collier County, including those operated by Boys & Girls Club and St Matt's, who have partnered with Emmanuel Lutheran Church at our other campus and anticipate similar on this campus. The proposed food trucks will complement the vision of the Subdistrict of establishing a sense of community and providing a public space for community engagement. H:\2006\2006096A\WP\GMPA\12-15-2023\Supplemental Narrative (1-4-2024).docx Packet Pg. 819 9.A.4.c JUSTIFICATION AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION Packet Pg. 820 9.A.4.c EXHIBIT V.D.1 JUSTIFICATION AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION MISSION SUBDISTRICT GMPA REVISED 4-19-2023 Requested Changes The proposed GMPA expands the Mission Subdistrict boundary by approximately 14 acres and allows for additional uses ancillary to a church/place of worship. Existing Conditions and Surrounding Land Uses The subject property is located on the south side of Oil Well Road, ±1,000 feet west of the intersection of Oil Well Road and Everglades Boulevard North and is comprised of 15 parcels totaling ±35.90 acres in size. The site is within the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. The land use designation is currently Estates — Mixed Use District, Mission Subdistrict and Residential Estates Subdistrict. A portion of the property is zoned Community Facilities Planned Unit Development (Emmanuel Lutheran Church CFPUD), allowing for a church/place of worship and uses typically ancillary to a church, including but not limited to a multi -purpose building with kitchen, meeting rooms, indoor recreation facilities for church members, social services, and a community park and athletic fields. The parcels outside of the CFPUD are zoned E — Estates, allowing for low density residential development and limited agricultural activities. There is a concurrent CFPUD rezoning application to adjust the boundary of the CFPUD to include the adjacent Estates zoned parcels within the Subdistrict. The surrounding lands to the north, south, east, and west are designated Estates — Mixed Use District. The zoning and existing land use on the surrounding lands are as follows: North: Across Oil Well Road, zoned Estates, county owned stormwater management lake and single-family residential estates lots. South: Zoned Estates, single-family residential and vacant estates lots. East: Zoned Estates, vacant estates lots. West: Zoned Estates, single-family residential estates lots. Justification This GMPA expands the Mission Subdistrict in acreage and also by providing additional services, ancillary to a church/place of worship, that will also benefit residents in the surrounding area. Oil Well Road is an arterial roadway that saw a 10-20% increase in traffic from 2020 (2021 AUIR) and is an appropriate location for a community church campus. This GMPA and companion PUDA introduce new uses, such as not -for -profit medical offices, essential services, U.S. Post Office, individual and family social services, and not -for -profit colleges and universities will provide additional social, family, and medical services to those within the Rural Estates on a shared site already permitted for a church and similar uses. Currently, with the exception of two public schools, no such services exist within f6 miles. Similar individual and family social services Page 1 of 5 HA2006\2006096A\WP\GMPA\3rd Resubmittal\Exhibit V.D.1 - Justification and Supplemental Information (rev 4-19-2023).docx Packet Pg. 821 9.A.4.c provided at a similar scale to the proposed subdistrict and not for profit medical offices are located in Golden Gate City (±16 miles from the subdistrict) and Immokalee (±17 miles from the subdistrict). The nearest similar, not -for -profit physical fitness facilities are ±19.5 miles from the subdistrict at the intersection of Airport Road and Pine Ridge Road. The proposed subdistrict will fill a gap in postal services, as the nearest United States Postal Service (LISPS) location is in Immokalee (118.4 miles from the subdistrict); and the USPS Annex is in Golden Gate City (±15.3 miles from the subdistrict). Consistency with Florida Statutes and Collier County GMP Consistency with GGAMP: Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element Goal 1: TO GUIDE LAND USE AND PUBLIC FACILITY DECISION MAKING AND TO BALANCE THE NEED TO PROVIDE BASIC SERVICES WITH NATURAL RESOURCE CONCERNS THROUGHA WELL PLANNED MIX OF COMPATIBLE LAND USES WHICH ENSURE THE HEALTH, SAFETY, WELFARE, AND QUALITY OF LIFE OF THE LOCAL RESIDENTS. OBJECTIVE 1.1: Develop new or revised uses of land consistent with designations outlined on the Rural Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map. Response: The subject parcels being added to the subdistrict are adjacent to the existing boundary. The expanded uses are accessory to the existing development and will provide services that are typically found in residential areas and will improve the quality of life for the local residents. The proposed amendment is consistent with this policy in that it will not result in sprawl. Consistency with Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element Policy 4.2.5: Consistent with public safety requirements and best practices for rural areas, outdoor lighting within Rural Golden Gate Estates shall be placed, constructed and maintained in such manner as to prevent or reduce light pollution. In implementing this Policy, the County shall: a. Adhere to the "Collier County Lighting Standards" (County Manager's Office Standards dated January 6, 2017) as amended, with respect to new and existing County owned or maintained sites and structures. b. Continue to coordinate with FPL and FDOT to improve roadway and security lighting consistent with International Dark Skies Association best practices. c. Consider changes to the Land Development Code and other applicable ordinances to create voluntary or mandatory outdoor lighting standards for commercial, residential or other uses consistent with International Dark Skies Association best practices, and determine the extent such standards apply to new or existing development. Response: The companion PUDA to this GMPA provides lighting standards within the Development Standards section (Exhibit "B"). This section of the PUDA now provides for specific lighting standards pertaining to the maximum height of light poles and desired color temperature. The PUDA also makes reference to the Illuminating Engineering Society (IES) for Page 2 of 5 HA2006\2006096A\WP\GMPA\3rd Resubmittal\Exhibit V.D.I - Justification and Supplemental Information (rev 4-19-2023).docx Packet Pg. 822 9.A.4.c color temperature recommendations for recreation lighting. These standards were based on the IES Backlight/Uplight/Glare (BUG) rating system which was developed to help control uplight and light trespass in addition to brightness and glare control. As a result, a desired dark sky compliant light fixture would have all its light project below the horizontal plane of its lowest light -emitting part and 0% of the light produced spill into the area above the lowest portion of the luminaire housing (0% UH - Uplight High, and 0% UL - Uplight Low). Proposed site lighting fixtures will have an IES BUG rating of U= 0, indicating that it has Uplight of 0%, which is dark sky compliant. Consistency with GMP Policy 5.5: Discourage unacceptable levels of urban sprawl in order to minimize the cost of community facilities by: confining urban intensity development to areas designated as Urban ... . Response: The subject parcels being added to the subdistrict are adjacent to the existing boundary. Collier County Public Utilities do not currently serve the property. The nearest existing facilities include an 8" water main stub -out on the south side of Oil Well Road, 1,350 feet east of Tangelo Drive, and an 8" force main at the southeast corner of that intersection. The applicant is negotiating an interim utilities agreement that would allow for the applicant to construct interim facilities that would eventually connect to county -owned water and sewer, based on the county's long-term but currently unfunded plans to extend utilities along Oil Well Road. The project is served by CAT and is within walking distance of a bus stop along CAT Route 28. Policy 5.6: New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code (Ordinance 04-41, adopted June 22, 2004 and effective October 18, 2004, as amended). Response: The proposed uses are compatible with and complementary to the surrounding land uses. Churches and the ancillary uses requested are permitted as conditional uses in the Estates zoning district. Development standards have been crafted to ensure compatibility with and to minimize impacts in adjacent land uses. Policy 7.1: The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. Response: The primary means of ingress/egress will be via the existing access to Oil Well Road, which is a minor arterial road. A secondary means of ingress/egress is proposed to Oil Well Road. Policy 7.2: The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals. Response: The subject site shall utilize internal accesses to limit connections to Oil Well Road to two points of ingress/egress. Page 3 of 5 HA2006\2006096A\WP\GMPA\3rd Resubmittal\Exhibit V.D.1 - Justification and Supplemental Information (rev 4-19-2023).docx Packet Pg. 823 9.A.4.c Policy 7.3: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and/or interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. The interconnection of local streets between developments is also addressed in Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element. Response: As a result of the NIM and comments from County staff, it was found that an interconnection to 3 1 " Ave. NE would not be beneficial to the surrounding neighborhood, thus any proposal for that interconnection has been removed. Consistency with Florida Statutes relating to Plan Amendments, Chapters 163.3167(9), 163.3177 (6)(a) 2 and 8, and 163.3184. 163.3167(9) Each local government shall address in its comprehensive plan, as enumerated in this chapter, the water supply sources necessary to meet and achieve the existing and projected water use demand for the established planning period, considering the applicable plan developed pursuant to s. 373.709. 163.3177(6)(a)2 The future land use plan and plan amendments shall be based upon surveys, studies, and data regarding the area, as applicable, including: a. The amount of land required to accommodate anticipated growth. b. The projected permanent and seasonal population of the area. c. The character of undeveloped land. d. The availability of water supplies, public facilities, and services. e. The need for redevelopment, including the renewal of blighted areas and the elimination of nonconforming uses which are inconsistent with the character of the community. f. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to or closely proximate to military installations. g. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to an airport as defined in s. 330.35 and consistent with s. 333.02. h. The discouragement of urban sprawl. i. The need for job creation, capital investment, and economic development that will strengthen and diversify the community's economy. j. The need to modify land uses and development patterns within antiquated subdivisions. Response: The subdistrict is not closely proximate to military installations or adjacent to an airport. Paragraphs f and g do not apply. With respect to paragraphs a, b, c, and d, the growth of the congregation reflects the growth occurring in the surrounding area. The residential development and population in the area has created a need for the ancillary uses the church will provide, such as an athletic field, community park, and social services. Collier County Public Utilities do not currently serve the property. The nearest existing facilities include an 8" water main stub -out on the south side of Oil Well Road, 1,350 feet east of Tangelo Drive, and an 8" force main at the southeast corner of that intersection. The applicant is negotiating an interim utilities agreement that would allow for the applicant to construct interim facilities that would eventually connect to county -owned water and sewer, based on the county's long-term but currently unfunded plans to extend utilities along Oil Well Road. Page 4 of 5 H:\2006\2006096A\WP\GMPA\3rd Resubmittal\Exhibit V.D.1 - Justification and supplemental Information (rev 4-19-2023).doex Packet Pg. 824 9.A.4.c Relative to h and j, these parcels are appropriate to include within this subdistrict, as they are adjacent to the existing subdistrict, which discourages sprawl, and maximizes the efficient use of existing transit services that currently serve the site. As to paragraph i, the additional uses will result in approximately 35 full -time -equivalent jobs at build -out, and the services the church will be able to provide will improve the desirability for housing in the area and strengthen the community. Desirable housing is an important consideration for Collier County to attract new or relocating businesses and allow existing businesses to grow. 163.3177(6)(a)8 Future land use map amendments shall be based upon the following analyses: a. An analysis of the availability of facilities and services. b. An analysis of the suitability of the plan amendment for its proposed use considering the character of the undeveloped land, soils, topography, natural resources, and historic resources on site. c. An analysis of the minimum amount of land needed to achieve the goals and requirements of this section. Response: The proposed GMPA is consistent with the intent and procedural and substantive requirements set forth in the Florida Statutes referenced above. In addition to this narrative report, we have provided other documents which collectively constitute sufficient data and analysis to reach that conclusion. Page 5 of 5 H:\2006\2006096A\WP\GMPA\3rd Resubmittal\Exhibit V.D.I - Justification and Supplemental Information (rev 4-19-2023).docx Packet Pg. 825 9.A.4.c PUBLIC FACILITIES REPORT Packet Pg. 826 9.A.4.c EXHIBIT V.E.1 MISSION SUBDISTRICT PUBLIC FACILITIES REPORT REVISED OCTOBER 2023 Per the 2022 Annual Update and Inventory Report on Public Facilities (AUIR), the potable water LOS standard is 130 GPCD; and per the 2022 AUIR, the wastewater treatment system LOS standard is 90 GPCD. The proposed amendment to the Mission Subdistrict potentially increases population by approximately 40 people at buildout (16 dwelling units at 2.50 persons per household). Per the 2022 AUIR the estimated potable water and wastewater average requirements for the residential portion of the proposed amendment are as follows: Potable Water 5,200 GPD average daily Wastewater 3,600 GPD average daily Utilities do not currently serve the site; however, the intent is to move forward with creating an interim utilities agreement that would allow for the applicant to construct interim facilities that would eventually connect to county -owned water and sewer, based on the county's long-term but currently unfunded plans to extend utilities along Oil Well Road. According to the Collier County 2022 AUIR, currently there is an existing landfill capacity of 12,906,476 tons, and a ten-year landfill capacity requirement of 2,906,534 tons. The estimated life of the landfill is 40 years. The proposed amendment will increase the population by approximately 40 people at buildout. Using a ton's per capita rate of 0.64 (per the 2022 AUIR), a population increase of 40 people will generate an additional 25.6 tons disposed per year. This is adequate to accommodate the expected tons per capita generated by the proposed project. Stormwater retention and detention will comply with SFWMD requirements, and State and County standards for off -site discharges will be met, resulting in no adverse impacts to stormwater management (drainage) level of service. The site does not affect County -maintained canals, ditches, or stormwater control structures. The adopted level of service for schools based upon permanent FISH capacity: 100% for high school Concurrency Service Areas (CSAs); 95% for elementary CSAs; and 95% for middle school CSAs. The subject site is within the E9, Central Area for elementary schools, the M3, North Central Area for middle schools, and the H3, North Central Area for high schools. The E9 CSA includes three elementary schools, Big Cypress, Palmetto, and Sabal Palm. They have a combined FISH capacity of 2,620 students, a 2020/2021 peak enrollment of 1,804 students, and a projected 2025/2026 enrollment of 2,087 students (80% capacity). According to the Collier County Public Schools CIP, enrollment at Big Cypress Elementary School is being monitored. The H3 and M3 CSAs include Golden Gate and Palmetto Ridge High Schools; and Corkscrew, Golden Gate, and Cypress Palm Middle Schools. The high schools have a combined FISH capacity Page 1 of 2 HA2006\2006096A\WP\GMPA\Sent to Public Utilites (revised PF Report) (10-9-2023)\Exhibit V.E.I -Public Facilities Report (rev 10-10- 2023).docx Packet Pg. 8 7 9.A.4.c of 3,892 students, a 2020/2021 peak enrollment of 3,938 students, and a projected 2025/2026 enrollment of 3,558 students (91 % capacity). The middle schools have a combined FISH capacity of 3,422 students, a 2020/2021 peak enrollment of 2,657 students, and a projected 2025/2026 enrollment of 2,652 (77% capacity). According to the Collier County Public Schools CIP, enrollment at Golden Gate and Palmetto Ridge High Schools; and Corkscrew Middle School is being monitored. According to the Collier County 2022 AUIR, there is a projected 5-year surplus of 32.44 community park acres; and 161.49 regional park acres. Per the 2022 AUIR, a population increase of 5 people necessitates an additional 0.006 community park acres (a loss of 0.0012 acres per person) and 0.0135 regional park acres (a loss of 0.0027 acres per person). There is a sufficient surplus of community park acreage to serve the proposed development. An EMS/fire station is located approximately 5.7 miles west at 13240 Immokalee Road. The subject site is within the North Collier Fire District. Projected traffic impacts associated with the proposed amendment do not exceed the traffic impacts allowed under current conditions and does not create any significant and adverse impacts to the area roadway network. Please see the attached Traffic Analysis for transportation impacts and further details. Page 2 of 2 H:\2006\2006096A\WP\GMPA\Sent to Public Utilites (revised PF Report) (10-9-2023)\Exhibit V.E.1 -Public Facilities Report (rev 10-10- 2023).docx Packet Pg. 8 8771 9.A.4.c TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT Packet Pg. 829 EXHIBIT V.E.3 9.A.4.c TREBILCOCK CONSULTING SOLUTIONS Traffic Impact Statement Emmanuel Lutheran Church Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) Planned Unit Development Amendment (PUDA) Prepared for: Hole Montes, Inc. 950 Encore Way, Naples, FL 34110 Phone: 239-254-2000 Collier County, Florida 2/20/2023 Prepared by: Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 2800 Davis Boulevard, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239-566-9551 Email: ntrebilcock@trebilcock.biz Collier County Transportation Methodology Fee* — $500.00 Fee Collier County Transportation Review Fee* — Malor Scale Study— $1,500 Fee Note— *to be collected at time of first submittal Packet Pg. 830 9.A.4.c Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA — Traffic Impact Statement — February 2023 Statement of Certification I certify that this Traffic Impact Statement has been prepared by me or under my immediate supervision and that I have experience and training in the field of Traffic and Transportation Engineering. �:CENSF.,O0 No 47116 �0�. STATE OF :�W Digitally signed by Norman Trebilcock DN: c=US, st=Florida,l=Naples, o=Norman Trebilcock, cn=Norman Trebilcock, email=ntrebilcock@trebilcock.biz Date: 2023.02.27 09:20:54-05'00' Norman J. Trebilcock, AICP, PTOE, PE FL Registration No. 47116 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 2800 Davis Boulevard, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34104 Company Cert. of Auth. No. 27796 PRINTED COPIES OF THIS DOCUMENT ARE NOT CONSIDERED SIGNED AND SEALED AND THE SIGNATURE MUST BE VERIFIED ON ANY ELECTRONIC COPIES. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 12 Packet Pg. 831 9.A.4.c Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA — Traffic Impact Statement — February 2023 Table of Contents Project Description...................................................................... TripGeneration............................................................................ Trip Distribution and Assignment ........................................ BackgroundTraffic............................................................... Existing and Future Roadway Network ................................ Project Traffic Impacts — Roadway Link Analysis ................. Site Access Analysis..................................................................... Improvement Analysis................................................................ Mitigation of Impact................................................................... Appendices ............................................................. 4 ............................................................. 7 ..................................................... 10 ............................. I....................... 11 ..................................................... 12 ..................................................... 13 ...........................................................14 ...........................................................15 ...........................................................16 Appendix A: Project Conceptual Site Plan.................................................................................................17 Appendix B: Initial Meeting Checklist (Methodology Meeting).................................................................20 Appendix C: ITE Trip Generation Calculations.......................................................................................... 27 Appendix D: Collier County Transporation Element Map —TR 3.0...........................................................48 Appendix E: Collier County Access Management Policy —Table 1...........................................................50 Appendix F: Project Turning Movements................................................................................................52 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 13 Q Packet Pg. 832 9.A.4.c Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA — Traffic Impact Statement — February 2023 Project Description The Emmanuel Lutheran Church development (also known as Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples) is located on the south side of Oil Well Road (CR 858), west of the Everglades Boulevard and Oil Well Road intersection, and lies within Section 19, Township 48 South, Range 28 East, in Collier County, Florida. Refer to Figure 1— Project Location Map and Appendix A: Project Conceptual Site Plan. Figure 1— Project Location Map Fl �. Q I s'.0 Unu atu nnu +v -. onn,Jloia,a.Pa«,�n,9 i 6 a1nlg0 BlG'ldn FBI I. f�iAJ� ff11 Com 1110 ' 1wl e ItAmb At CW1h i� © fie •.. j n xlnntO �— aLnwmn,InlnO onw50,11 l r d AJ Saa Ao.wO Walah nW.n�` tCLCV�N 77117 / 11 �arllrl� ~ rWW.I (vale ilea 0 KPYttCMndJ� onda OW _._vHmaLAun. VNA. Project V 00 F � 11 �`�, (oprvewlNUpogQ ) a WtmcU Dell ' f i)L Cwmry Club a ®11�aaa Wa0Mt�1. ""•da �19rtne I A Pp9W tlhJ P.J+I r.9 rAn P\I i vulf8t I� 1 lrblr F, yrJ9 Goa k ) r The subject parcels are currently partially developed. The development was previously approved with a zoning classification of Community Facilities Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) to allow 90,000 square feet (sf) — up to 1,000 seats of uses to include worship/church and related social services, a 300 person child and adult day care facility, job training or vocational rehabilitation, a 450 person private school; or, in the alternative, development of up to 10 single family dwelling units, in accordance with Collier County Ordinance #2011-23. The proposed amendment requests to add 2 adjacent parcels to the existing approved site and to allow up to 90,000 sf of uses to include worship/church center (up to 1,000 seats) and related social services, a 200 person child and adult day care facility, job training or vocational rehabilitation, a 450 person private or public school (elementary and secondary school); a 300 student college/university; a maximum of 3,600 sf of medical office; up to 4 food trucks; or, in lieu of permitted community facilities, development of up to 16 single family dwelling units. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 4 Packet Pg. 833 9.A.4.c Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA — Traffic Impact Statement— February 2023 In addition, the amendment proposes to provide a maximum trip generation cap to allow for flexibility in the proposed uses without creating unforeseen impacts on the adjacent roadway network. The purpose of this Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) is to document the transportation impacts associated with the proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) and Planned Unit Development Amendment (PUDA). This traffic report is in agreement with the latest adopted Collier County Traffic Impact Study Guidelines and Procedures. The project provides the highest and best use scenario with respect to the project's proposed trip generation. Consistent with the recommendations illustrated in Collier County Traffic Impact Study Guidelines and Procedures, traffic generation associated with the proposed development is evaluated based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (TGM), 11th Edition and ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition. From a traffic standpoint, the permitted CFPUD parameters are depicted in this report consistent with the approved TIS prepared by TR Transportation Consultants, Inc. and dated April 27, 2010. The subject site will continue to allow for the development of church related uses and other uses beneficial to the local community. Consistent with the approved 2010 TIS and in order to provide the most flexibility with the community facility floor area, the development will allow up to 15,000 sf of office use. In agreement with ITE Land Use Code (LUC) descriptions, the ITE land use designations are illustrated in Table 1. A transportation methodology meeting was held with the Collier County Transportation staff on February 9, 2022, via email. For details refer to Appendix B: Initial Meeting Checklist (Methodology Meeting). For the purposes of this analysis, the traffic planning horizon year is assumed to be 2027. Access to the Emmanuel Lutheran Church site is currently provided via a full movement access onto Oil Well Road. In addition, the proposed amendment will allow an additional access on Oil Well Road near the eastern property boundary. A detailed evaluation of applicable access points —turn lane requirements will be performed at the time of site development permitting/platting when more specific development parameters will be made available. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 5 Packet Pg. 834 9.A.4.c Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA — Traffic Impact Statement — February 2023 Table 1 Development Program — ITE Land Use Designation Land Use - [SIC Code in Brackets] ITE Land Use Code Size Approved Development Parameters(2) 65,000 square feet Church/Place of Worship - [8661] 560 — Church (1,000 seats) Private Elementary and Secondary Schools - 536 — Private School (K-12) 450 students [8211, 8243, 8244, 8299] Child Daycare Services - [8351] 565 — Day Care Center 300 students Office - [all PUD permitted uses typical for 710 — General Office 15,000 square feet office uses] Single -Family Dwellings - [N/A] 210 — Single -Family Detached Varies(3) Housing Proposed Development Parameters 65,000 square feet Church/Place of Warship - [8661] 560 — Church (1,000 seats) Private or Public Elementary and Secondary Schools - [8211, 532 — Private School (K-12) 450 students 8243, 8244, 8299] Child Daycare Services - [8351] 565 — Day Care Center 200 students Colleges and Universities - [8221] 550 — University/College 300 students Medical Office - [8011] 630 — Clinic 3,600 square feet Office - [all PUD permitted uses typical for 710 —General Office 15,000 square feet office uses] Food Trucks - [5963] 926 — Food Cart Pod 4 food carts Single -Family Dwellings - [N/A] 210—Single-Family Detached Varies (4) Housing Note(s): 1) N/A= Not applicable 2) Consistent with Ordinance #2011-23 and TIS dated April 27, 2010. 3) Convert non-residential uses to single-family dwelling units (maximum 10 units) subject to size and trip cap limitations, as applicable. 4) Convert non-residential uses to single-family dwelling units (maximum 16 units) subject to size and trip cap limitations, as applicable. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 6 Packet Pg. 835 9.A.4.c Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA —Traffic Impact Statement — February 2023 Trip Generation The software program OTISS (Online Traffic Impact Study Software), most current version is used to evaluate the projected trip generation for the project. The ITE equations and/or rates are used for the trip generation calculations, as applicable. The ITE — OTISS trip generation calculation worksheets are provided in Appendix C: ITE Trip Generation Calculations. The internal capture accounts for a reduction in external traffic because of the interaction between the multiple land uses in a site. Although it is expected that some trips between the proposed on -site uses will be made without travel to the off -site street system (internal capture), conservatively no reductions for internal capture traffic are considered for this project. The pass -by trips account for traffic that is already on the external roadway network and stops at the project on the way to a primary trip destination. In accordance with Collier County and ITE guidelines, no pass -by reductions are recommended for the analyzed land uses. Approved Zoning —Trip Cap Limitations As illustrated in the Ordinance #2011-23, Exhibit F Development Commitments for the Project —1.6, the approved CFPUD "shall be limitted to 666 unadjusted two-way, AM peak hour trips and/or 323 unadjusted two-way, PM peak hour trips; allowing for flexibility in the proposed uses without creating unforseen impacts on the adjacent roadway network. For purposes of calculation of the weekday AM and PM peak hour trip generation for this PUD, the lesser of the weekday AM or PM peak hour trips as calculated in the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Report, titled Trip Generation, 8th Edition or the trip generation as calculated in the ITE Trip Generation Report shall be utilized."( Appendix C) The approved trip cap reflects the ITE Trip Generation Manual (TGM), 81h Edition and it was calculated in the TIS dated April 27, 2010 (reference Table 2A and Appendix Q. Table 2A ITE TGM 81h Edition —Trip Generation — Approved Development —Average Weekday Development Daily (2-way) AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ITE Land Use Size Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Church 65,000 square feet 592 22 14 36 13 14 27 Private School (K-12) 450 students 1,116 223 142 365 33 44 77 Day Care Center 300 students 1,359 119 105 224 93 104 197 General Office 15,000 square feet 310 36 5 41 4 18 22 Traffic j 3,377 400 1 266 1 666 143 180 323 It is noted that the approved development trip cap was established based on the church square footage. The ITE TGM 8th Edition, LUC 560 (Church) does not provide any traffic data for AM and PM peak hour for the number of seats variable. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 7 Packet Pg. 836 9.A.4.c Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA —Traffic Impact Statement —February 2023 Church land use — ITE TGM 11th Edition — a trip generation comparison is provided in Appendix C between the available land use variables: gross square footage and number of seats. The number of seats generates the highest traffic impact when ITE TGM 11th Edition is utilized. As such, traffic projections for the proposed amendment will reflect the number of seats. Consistent with the traffic calculations illustrated in the approved TIS dated April 27, 2010, the traffic generated by the permitted CFPUD uses is conservatively evaluated based on the current ITE TGM 11th Edition using the square footage variable (Table 213 and Appendix C). Table 2B ITE TGM 11th Edition —Trip Generation —Approved Uses —Average Weekday Development Daily (2-way) AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ITE Land Use Size(l) Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Church 65,000 square feet 494 13 8 21 14 18 32 Private School (K-12) 450 students 1,116 224 132 356 33 44 77 Day Care Center 300students 1,227 124 110 234 111 126 237 General Office 15,000 square feet 223 29 4 33 6 28 34 Traffic 3,060 390 254 644 164 216 380 It is noted that the proposed amendment does not change the permitted parameters for the church use (maximum 1,000 seats). As illustrated in Table 2A and Table 2B, the traffic increase for the church use is 5 vehicles per hour (vph) for the PM peak hour period when the ITE TGM 111h Edition - square footage variable is utilized. However, the traffic increase is significant (73 vph) when the ITE TGM 11th Edition — seat variable is utilized for the church use (Appendix C, Table 2A and Table 2C — PM peak hour). Consistent with the trip cap requirement illustrated in the Ordinance #2011-23, Table 2A reflects the trip generation of the development as currently approved and it is utilized for the purposes of this report. Proposed Zoning — Traffic Generation Potential Private or public school land use — a trip generation comparison is provided between the LUC 532 — Private School (K-12) and LUC 538 — Charter School (K-12) as illustrated in Appendix C. The LUC 532 — Private School (K-12) generates the highest traffic impact and it is utilized for the purposes of this report. The trip generation evaluated for the proposed GMPA/PUDA development conditions is summarized in Table 2C. The maximum traffic impact potential associated with the proposed development at build -out condition is conservatively projected to be 455 unadjusted PM peak hour two-way trips. Based on the information illustrated in Table 2A and Table 2C, the zoning amendment application request will increase the development traffic impacts by approximately 41% in the PM peak hour (455/323-1=40.9%). The traffic increase is approximately 20% when the square footage variable is utilized for the church use, as considered in the 2010 TIS prepared in support of the current zoning approval [(455-100+32)/323-1= 19.8%]. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 18 Packet Pg. 837 9.A.4.c Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA — Traffic Impact Statement — February 2023 Table 2C ITE TGM 11" Edition —Trip Generation — Proposed GMPA/PUDA Build -out —Average Weekday Development Daily (2-way) AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ITE Land Use Size(�) Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Church 1,000 seats 900 42 28 70 45 55 100 Private School (K-12) 450 students 1,116 224 132 356 33 44 77 Day Care Center 200 students 818 83 73 156 74 84 158 General Office 15,000 square feet 223 29 4 33 6 28 34 Clinic 3,600 square feet 164 14 3 17 5 11 16 University/College 300 students 468 35 10 45 14 31 45 Food Cart Pod 4 food carts 246 13 12 25 12 13 25 Traffic 3,935 440 262 702 189 266 455 Proposed Zoning —Transportation Concurrency Evaluation —Traffic Impacts In agreement with the Collier County Traffic Impact Study Guidelines and Procedures, significantly impacted roadways are identified based on the proposed project highest peak hour trip generation (net external traffic) and consistent with the peak hour of the adjacent street traffic. Based on the information contained in Collier County Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR), the peak hour for adjacent roadway network is PM. Table 2D illustrates the estimated net new traffic generated by the proposed amendment. The potential additional traffic is determined as the difference between the maximum traffic impact potential associated with the proposed development (Table 2C) and the adopted trip cap per current zoning approval (Table 2A). Table 2D Trip Generation — Projected Net New Traffic — Average Weekday Development PM Peak Hour Enter Exit Total Proposed Development GMPA/PUDA(1) 189 266 455 Approved Zoning(2) 143 180 323 Net New Traffic 46 86 132 Increase/(Decrease) Note(s): (1) Refer to Table 2C; (2) Refer to Table 2A. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 9 Packet Pg. 838 9.A.4.c Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA — Traffic Impact Statement — February 2023 Proposed Zoning — Site Access Traffic Impacts The site access operational analysis will be provided at the time of future development order applications and will reflect the overall generated traffic at build -out conditions — weekday AM and PM peak hour trips (Table 2C and Appendix C). Table 2E presents the trip generation for the church use during the Sunday peak hour of the generator (Appendix C — highest generator between the seat variable and the square footage variable). Table 2E Trip Generation — Proposed GMPA/PUDA Build -out Conditions — Sunday Development Sunday Peak Hour of Generator ITE Land Use Size Enter Exit Total Church 65,000 square feet 323 350 673 Based on the traffic data illustrated in Table 2C and Table 2E, the highest traffic impact at the site access location occurs during the AM peak hour (702 two-way trips). Trip Distribution and Assignment The traffic generated by the development is assigned to the adjacent roadway network based on the traffic distribution illustrated in the approved TIS dated April 27, 2010 and consistent with the transportation methodology (Appendix B). The site -generated trip distribution is shown in Table 3, Project Traffic Distribution for PM Peak Hour and is graphically depicted in Figure 2 — Project Distribution by Percentage and by PM Peak Hour. Table 3 Project Traffic Distribution for PM Peak Hour Distribution PM Peak Hr Project Roadway Link CC AUIR Roadway Link Location of Project Traffic Vol.* Link ID # Enter Exit Traffic Oil Well Road 119.0 Immokalee Rd to Project 50% EB — 23 WB —43 Oil Well Road 119.0 Project to Everglades Blvd 50% WB — 23 EB — 43 Note(s): * Peak hour, peak direction traffic volumes are underlined and bold to be used in Roadway Link Level of Service calculations; peak hour, peak direction per 2022 Annual Update and Inventory Report. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 110 Packet Pg. 839 9.A.4.c Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA — Traffic Impact Statement —February 2023 Figure 2 — Project Distribution by Percentage and by PM Peak Hour I r� 50% 50% — - W Rd Ho.; I.::rl v:, .: nd 01 11 LU ou N491 na - 1 e�nM t t t 6 r t fn re-u.I9 1 t Project Trip / / t I Distribution , By Percentage .. -r"-----, a a NAONRya IrK� t t t i f 1 2.� EB 23; WB 43 EB 43; WB 23 0 H '„�]. .. of Well Rd 0*1�6 - 0�1 N'e9 Rd e 1,4eii Rd J W".0 Rd o �. v/rs ud ® - �. t i cam 1y 1.1, t Project Trip / Distribution By PM Peak Hour -r---'-"t ' � t 1 Background Traffic The existing traffic conditions are extracted from the 2022 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) Average background traffic growth rates were estimated for the segments of the roadway network in the study area using the Collier County Traffic Impact Study Guidelines and Procedures recommendation of a minimum 2% growth rate, or the historical growth rate evaluated based on the annual peak hour, peak direction traffic volume (estimated from 2008 through 2022 as illustrated in AUIR), whichever is greater. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 11 Packet Pg. 840 9.A.4.c Emmanuel Lutheran Church - GMPA/PUDA - Traffic Impact Statement - February 2023 Another way to derive the background traffic is to use the 2022 AUIR volume plus the trip bank volume Table 4, Background Traffic without Project, illustrates the application of projected growth rates to generate the projected background (without project) peak hour peak direction traffic volume for the future horizon year 2027. Table 4 Background Traffic without Project (2022 - 2027) 2027 Projected 2027 Projected 2022 AUIR Projected Pk Hr, Pk Dir Pk Hr, Pk Dir CC Pk Hr, Pk Dir Traffic Background k Back Background Roadway AUIR Roadway Link Background Annual Growth Traffic Volume Trip Traffic Volume Link Link Location Traffic Growth Factor w/out Project Bank w/out Project ID # Volume Rate (trips/hr) (tripsTrip (trips/hr) (%/yr)* Growth Bank*** Factor** Oil Well 119.0 Immokalee Rd to 1,170 (EB) 4.00% 1.2167 1,423 528 1,698 EB Road Project Oil Well 119.0 Project to 1,170 (EB) 4.00% 1.2167 1,423 528 1,698 EB Road Everglades Blvd Note(s): * Annual Growth Rate — estimated for 2008-2022 peak hour, peak direction traffic volumes, or 2% minimum. ** Growth Factor = (1 +Annual Growth Rate)5. 2027 Projected Volume = 2022 AUIR Volume x Growth Factor. *** 2027 Projected Volume = 2022 AUIR Volume +Trip Bank. The projected 2027 Peak Hour — Peak Direction Background Traffic is the greater of the Growth Factor or Trip Bank calculation, which is underlined and bold as applicable. Existing and Future Roadway Network The existing roadway conditions are extracted from the 2022 AUIR. Roadway improvements that are currently under construction or are scheduled to be constructed within the five-year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) or Capital Improvement program (CIP) are considered to be committed improvements. As no such improvements were identified in the Collier County Five -Year Work Program (FY2023- FY2027), the evaluated roadway segments are anticipated to remain as such through project build -out (2027 planning horizon year). The existing and future roadway conditions are illustrated in Table 5, Existing and Future Roadway Conditions. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 12 Packet Pg. 841 9.A.4.c Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA — Traffic Impact Statement — February 2023 Table 5 Existing and Future Roadway Conditions CC 2022 Peak 2027 Peak Roadway AUIR Roadway Link 2022 2022 Hr, Peak Dir 2027 2027 Hr, Peak Dir Link Link Location Roadway Standard Capacity Roadway Standard Capacity ID # Conditions LOS Volume Conditions LOS Volume Oil Well 119.0 Immokalee Rd 4D D 2,200 4D D 2,200 Road to Project Oil Well 119.0 Project to 4D D 2,200 4D D 2,200 Road Everglades Blvd Note(s): 2U = 2-lane undivided roadway; 4D, 6D, 8D = 4-lane, 6-lane, 8-lane divided roadway, respectively; LOS = Level of Service. Project Traffic Impacts - Roadway Link Analysis The Collier County Transportation Planning Services developed Level of Service (LOS) volumes for the roadway links impacted by the project, which were evaluated to determine the project impacts to the area roadway network in the future. The Collier County Transportation Planning Services guidelines have determined that a project will be considered to have a significant and adverse impact if both the percentage volume capacity exceeds 2% of the capacity for the link directly accessed by the project and for the link adjacent to the link directly accessed by the project; 3% for other subsequent links and if the roadway is projected to operate below the adopted LOS standard. Based on these criteria, this project does not create any significant or adverse impacts to the area roadway network. None of the analyzed links are projected to exceed the adopted LOS standard with or without the project at 2027 future build -out conditions. Table 6A and Table 6B illustrate the LOS impacts of the project on the area roadway network. Table 6A Roadway Link Level of Service (LOS) — Roadway Peak Hour, Peak Direction — Year 2027 2027 Pk % Min LOS Min LOS CC 2027 Pk Project 2027 Pk Hr, Hr, Pk Dir Volume exceeded exceeded Roadway AUIR Roadway Link Hr, Pk Dir Traffic* Pk Dir Volume Capacity without with Link Link Location Capacity Added Background w/Project Impact by Project? Project? ID # Volume Traffic** * �* Project Yes/No Yes/No Oil Well 119.0 Immokalee Rd 2,200 EB — 23 1,698 EB 1,721 EB 1.05% No No Road to Project Oil Well 119.0 Project to 2,200 EB — 43 1,698 EB 1,741 EB 1.95% No No Road Everglades Blvd Note(s): *Refer to Table 3 from this report. **Refer to Table 4 from this report. ***2027 Projected Volume = 2027 Background Traffic + Project Volume Added. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 13 Packet Pg. 842 9.A.4.c Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA — Traffic Impact Statement — February 2023 Table 6B Roadway Link Level of Service (LOS) — Roadway Peak Hour, Non -Peak Direction — Year 2027 2027 Pk Min LOS Min LOS CC 2027 Pk Project 2027 Pk Hr, Hr, Non -Pk Volume exceeded exceeded Roadway AUIR Roadway Link Hr, Pk Dir Traffic Non -Pk Dir Dir Capacity without with Link Link Location Capacity Added Background Volume Impact by Project? Project? ID # Volume Traffic" w/Project Project Yes/No Yes/No ** Oil Well 119.0 Immokalee Rd 2,200 WB —43 1,698 WB 1,741 WB 1.95% No No Road to Project Oil Well 119.0 Project to 2,200 WB —23 1,698 WB 1,721 WB 0 1.05/o No No Road Everglades Blvd Note(s): *Refer to Table 3 from this report. **Refer to Table 4 for peak direction traffic; Conservatively, a D Factor = 50% is utilized to calculate the non -peak direction traffic. ***2027 Projected Volume = 2027 Background Traffic + Project Volume Added. As illustrated in Collier County LDC Chapter 6.02.02 — M. 2, once traffic from a development has been shown to be less than significant on any segment using Collier County TIS significance criterion, the development's impacts are not required to be analyzed further on any additional segments. The analyzed roadway segments are not located within the Collier County's Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA). In addition, the proposed development is not situated within the County's designated Transportation Concurrency Management Area (TCMA). The TCEA's and TCMA's designations are provided in Policy 5.4 and 5.6 of the Transportation Element — Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP). Site Access Analysis Access to the Emmanuel Lutheran Church site is currently provided via a full movement access onto Oil Well Road. In addition, the proposed amendment will allow an additional access on Oil Well Road near the eastern property boundary. Refer to Appendix A: Project Conceptual Site Plan. The secondary access is an existing right-in/right-out connection located approximately 1,000 ft east of the main access. In addition, the 2010 traffic study associated with the current zoning approval reflects two site connections on Oil Well Road and evaluates the eastern access as a right in/right-out connection. Access Management Evaluation Collier County's roadway network is comprised of State, County, City and privately maintained roadways. Roadways are generally classified as Arterial, Collector, or Local. Access management is the design of access between roadways and land development. It promotes the efficient and safe movement of people and goods by reducing conflicts on the roadway system. The Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 14 Packet Pg. 843 9.A.4.c Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA — Traffic Impact Statement — February 2023 latest adopted Access Management Policy for Collier County is depicted in Resolution No. 13-257, as amended. The Oil Well Road (CR 858) segment from Immokalee Road to Everglades Boulevard is currently an east - west 4-lane divided roadway under Collier County jurisdiction and has a posted legal speed of 45 mph in the vicinity of the project. As illustrated in the Collier County Capital Improvement Element — Transportation Element Map TR-3.0 (Federal Functional Classification/Urban Boundaries — Collier County), Oil Well Road is designated a minor arterial. Refer to Appendix D: Collier County Transportation Element Map — TR-3.0. A review of Collier County Access Management guidelines shows that for a Class 3 roadway, the established access management criteria are as follow: 660 feet minimum connection spacing; 660 feet directional median opening; 1,320 feet full median opening; and 2,640 feet (0.5 mi) signal spacing. Refer to Appendix E: Collier County Access Management Policy — Tablel. Oil Well Road — Main Access (Western Access) This connection is currently a full median opening. Based on our review of the existing full median opening spacing, this access exceeds the adopted full median opening standards for a Class 3 facility. Oil Well Road — Secondary Access (Eastern Access) This access is currently a right-in/right-out connection. Based on our review of the existing connection spacing, this access exceeds the adopted minimum connection spacing standards for a Class 3 roadway. In addition, this connection exceeds the adopted directional median opening spacing standards for a Class 3 roadway. As such, a directional median opening may be allowed at this location. As previously noted, the eastern access was considered and evaluated as a right in/right-out connection in the 2010 TIS associated with the current zoning approval. Trip assignments to access points Potential site access impacts are evaluated for AM and PM peak hour traffic (Table 2C) and Sunday peak hour of the generator (Table 2E). Based on the traffic data illustrated in Table 2C and Table 2E, the highest traffic impact at the site access location occurs during the AM peak hour (702 two-way trips). The assignment of the AM peak hour trips anticipated to be generated by the subject project to the site access driveways is presented in Appendix F: Project Turning Movements. Improvement Analysis The concurrency analysis presented in this report determined that the proposed project is not a significant and adverse traffic generator for the roadway network at this location. There is adequate and sufficient roadway capacity to accommodate the proposed development without adversely affecting adjacent roadway network level of service. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 15 Packet Pg. 844 9.A.4.c Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA — Traffic Impact Statement — February 2023 The maximum total daily trip generation for the proposed development shall not exceed 455 unadjusted two-way PM peak hour trips, based on the land use codes in the ITE Trip Generation Manual in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval, as applicable. In order to provide more flexibility, the development will have the ability to adjust proposed parameters by converting non-residential uses to single-family dwelling units (up to 16 units), subject to size and trip cap limitations, as applicable. The Oil Well Road roadway improvements for access to the site will be designed and permitted in accordance with the County's Access Management Policy and ROW Handbook, as applicable. A detailed evaluation of applicable access points will be performed at the time of site development permitting/platting when more specific development parameters will be made available. Mitigation of Impact The developer proposes to pay the appropriate Collier County Road Impact Fee as building permits are issued for the project, as applicable. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 16 Packet Pg. 845 9.A.4.c Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA — Traffic Impact Statement — February 2023 Appendix A Project Conceptual Site Plan Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 17 Packet Pg. 846 Approved Site Plan per Ordinance #2011-23 Emmanuel Lutheran Church —GMPAIPUDA —Traffic Impact Statement —February 2023 _j ------------- Ln --- ---- ----- 'J. 0 0 0 L"D Ux WMMA" 20=M A.. P.-,tW ISIM&F. "kno 2-W 9m% L Utftr Sww— 0.18 OM% ASpta* P.4emen 175 1727% F�P~Pwm 1= 4.60 Skk,.ft LW 4 .10% T 3.W 4.23. 0.26 L S W37 47-75% Land—P.Anw, p l8 our craw, T�� 22.72 UnW% R6***d Open Spay C: 21.72 Mae x 30 N . 6.S2 A» TOWOMSPft -13.nAq 63.17% Wl*ft LAX. ft.*,M SoddedandLandumPed Ann) MWTOW 09" 5FM woodied is —tin eacea&3^ MA d-08. Wuft Requind EdsOng %Man V40ts6w Wbeftt*Ad 1.7 A� a MIS . — I : n P�Mi.W E-,bft N an /� r Lh'�WSW%. - 026 A—t Jti r_ 3) — — — — — — — — — — - 90AWLE MwAnnnn Pdrdow Se Hftht 4 arAd 2-W howd 30 f— .Kb— ACtUW h&Wn 33 fW AWWn-n fw.N Wwlt� Mhw th. W—Np Unt� __j Wonhip caw IT W4. Tyfa w 2-1d hftft 35 fm Aural beWt 42 feat rawdn-n EXHIBIT C F�C.W ff LUTHERAN CHURCH �Wlm C.F.P.U.D. MASTER PLAN "epI d 7. EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL P a g e 118 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 9.A.4.c Prosed Site Plan Emmanuel Lutheran Church GMPA/PUDA Traffic Impact Statement ----___—___-ft-OwTAKE -on wcLr noin__ E• NIGN'Naci .-. P— �"' �..— r„�ftTibC2`,rNL:e�_ 20 iVitk � t -: •� •, ...... - ._._ 75'S:aTBACK T•j $gT$gy'KI It La. cap -,.i 4 1 IYaulh frklshnvtlR:�. LAKE �u.Rcr Pr^rse KanGvay F3SF+TA F+.dbit l ' , -- PcLe IW Fc d T.M „� Scuar Fir1e Psk nq Prea 25' VirtW_ Type'H' L.Im"po e0w I tI C �n<ep:ual woronip I TS SF'HACx E HKRA WALL �Ier Lrxxa+ - 16t9 � 1 $ 3 LAKE _* S 3 M1� J.G 1h NYm TYIre'6• w .... Fly,. Lanrswpa emre° eefhit 76"MtY Sotlr'.1� ZpnyO. LAKE SMtaSw x is 5na iLmd Uls FsmlNt >,YrENT.�1 Fa:,:•m:z< �a;.xtfr. nee LAND USE SUMMARY �.� r m Acres Percentage y g r g ; m? Eta Development Area 23.58 65.fr5,6 mL ' �'z ^ gr Rana 415e le Vsusm} Landscape Buffers? Setback 5,07 14,11 % Ejllee 5 SETACK Sports Fields 1.32 3-67 °k LmJ ape wilni°TS wide SmW* Lake 5.69 15.f31 6 Y Preserve Area 0-26 0.75 % O L i. S : z F..1y Itanaux° IA sngleFarttilp: ve aoo `I Development Intensity P y per Sec. D o! CFPUD Total 35.92 100.00 �TssETa'cK •• Maximum total floor area = 90,000s.f. 4AKF. Minimum Open Space Required? Provided: Maxlnxlm Principal Structure height 35.92 Ages X 309E =10.76 Acres Zoned height = 30 feet maximum Ts sE'aA-K V Actual height a 38 feet maximum for all structures Preserves can be used to meet L.D.0 required landscape other than Worship Center buffer in accordance with Exhlbit F, section 2.8 of the CFPUD. Worship Center ❑ " Zoned height 35 feet maximum r-- Lakes shown are conceptual and may change during the Actual height = 42 feet maximum SDP process. - 5, �C Deviations Minimum Native Vegetation Required! Provided 1,7 Acres x 15 Percent - 0.26 (plus+minus) Acres L l See list of Requested Deviations El J NOTES 20 Ulm typc'D- All stacking shalt occur with4n the develo mentwith no LsvmcaPA impacts on Oil Well Road for all uses. 315TAVE. N4 page 19 r n 0 V O N N O O O O N O N J O LO 00 lti v N N N O t11 N O O O O t11 O N J a N fC U fi U U m t X W C d E t r a Packet Pg. 848 9.A.4.c Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA — Traffic Impact Statement — February 2023 Appendix B Initial Meeting Checklist (Methodology Meeting) Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 120 Packet Pg. 849 9.A.4.c Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA — Traffic Impact Statement — February 2023 INITIAL MEETING CHECKLIST l Suggestion: Use this Appendix as a worksheet to ensure that no important elements are overlooked. Cross out the items that do not apply, or N/A (not applicable). Date: February 9.2022 Time: N/A Location: N/A — Via Email 3 People Attending: Name, Organization, and Telephone Numbers 1) Michael Sawyer, Collier County Growth Management Division 2) Norman Trebilcock, TCS 3) Civrian Malaescu, TCS Study Prepares: Preparer's Name and Title: Norman Trebilcock. AICP, PTOE, PE Organization: Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Address & Telephone Number: 2800 Davis Boulevard, Suite 200, Naples, FL 34104; ph 239-566-9551 Reviewer(s): Reviewer's Name & Title: Michael Sawyer, Proiect Manager Organization: Collier County Transportation Planning Department Telephone Number: 239-252-2926 Applicant: Applicant's Name: Hole Montes, hic, Address: 950 Encore Way, Naples. Fl 34110 Telephone Number: 239-254-2000 Proposed Development: Name: Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA and PUD Rezone Location: South of Oil Well Road (CR 858) and west of Everglades Boulevard, in the Golden Gate Estates area, in Collier County, Florida (refer to Figure 1). Land Use Type: Varies ITE Code #: Per Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 1 lth Edition Description: The subject project is currently approved to allow several community type uses per Ord. # 11-23. The anplicant intends to add 2 parcels to the PUD. Based on current approvals, the proiect is allowed to develop 90,000 sf (1.000 seats) of worship/church and related social services, a 300 person child and adult day care facility, iob training or vocational rehabilitation. a 450 person private school: or, in the alternative, development of tip to 10 single family dwelling units. Page 1 of 6 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 21 Packet Pg. 850 9.A.4.c Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA — Traffic Impact Statement — February 2023 The proposed aDDlication reauests to allow 90.000 sf (1.000 seats) of worship/church and related social services. a 200 person child and adult day care facility, a 300 student college/university, a 450 person private/public school (elementary and secondary school), a maximum of 3,600 sf of medical office, up to 4 food trucks, or, in lieu of permitted community facilities, development of up to 16 single family dwelling units. Figure 1— Project Location Map Q __ rw V 19 �lw�re4i3O Q __. Google zoning Existing: PUD—Ord. #11-23 Comprehensive plan recommendation: GMPA-PUDZ Requested: approval for development Findings of the Preliminary Study. Per Ord. #11-23, the approved trip cap is 666 trips for AM peak hour and 323 trips for PM peak hour (unadjusted two -wasps) or as calculated per current ITE Trip Generation Manual, whichever is less. The TIS shall be consistent with Collier County TIS Guidelines and Procedures. Proposed TIS will include trip generation, traffic distribution and assignments, significance test (based on 20/o/20/o/3% criteria). Trip Generation — ITE Trip Generation Manual, 1 lth Edition and ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition. Conservatively, internal capture and pass -by rates are not considered. Traffic impacts are evaluated based on the projected net new traffic (difference between the proposed development traffic and the approved current trip cap). Page 2 of 6 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 122 Packet Pg. 851 9.A.4.c Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA— Traffic Impact Statement— February 2023 Study ype: Since proiected net new external AM or PM project traffic is greater than 100 two-way peak hour trips, this study qualifies as a Major TIS — significant roadway and/or operational impacts. The proposed change will provide a new trip cap for the proiect. The projected traffic associated with the church use will reflect daily. AM and PM peak - hour based on the higher generator (square footage vs seats). In addition, church use will be evaluate for Sunday peak of the generator based on number of seats (consistent with the current Collier County Road Impact Fee Schedule). The TIS will detennine if there is consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element. The report will provide existing Level of Service (LOS) and document the impact the proposed change will have on designated arterial and collector roads. Roadway concurrence analysis — based on estimated net new external PM traffic. The analyzed development is not located within the County's Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA) or within the County's designated Transportation Concurrency Management Areas (TCMAs). The TCEAs' and TCMAs' designations are provided in Policy 5.4 and 5.6 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan. Turn lane improvements at the site access intersections will be evaluated at the time of future site development permitting/Platting when more specific development parameters will be made available. Study Tyne: (if not net increase, operational study) Small Scale TIS ❑ Minor TIS ❑ Mal or TIS Study Area: Boundaries: Adiacent streets — Oil Well Road: 31 A Ave NE Additional intersections to be analyzed: N/A Build Out Year: 2026 Planning Horizon Year: 2026 Analysis Time Period(s): AM/PM Peak Hour Future Off -Site Developments: N/A Source of Trip Generation Rates: PTE Trip Generation Manual (TGM), 11�' Edition Reductions in Trin Generation Rates: None: N/A Pass -by trips: N/A Internal trips: N/A Transit use: N/A Other: N/A Horizon Year Roadway Network Improvements: 2026 Page 3 of 6 3 E E O L) t L t V c O `m t J M c E E W Q d 0 N N 0 0 0 0 N 0 N J d 0 LO 0 ti N N c O N m 0 N N 0 0 0 0 N O N J a N a U d V U m t K LU r C d E t R .r Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 23 Q Packet Pg. 852 9.A.4.c Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA — Traffic Impact Statement — February 2023 Methodolop_y & Assumptions: Non -site traffic estimates: Collier County traffic counts and 2021 AUIR Site -trip generation: OTISS — ITE TGM, I Ph Edition Trip distribution method: Per distribution illustrated in the TIS associated with the previously approved zoning application — refer to Figure 2. Traffic assignment method: Site traffic assignment Traffic growth rate: Historical growth rate or 2% minimum Turning movements: Preliminary site access turning movements. Figure 2— Project Trip distribution by Percentage 50°6 Project Trip Distribution By Percentage Page 4 of 6 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 124 Packet Pg. 853 9.A.4.c Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA — Traffic Impact Statement — February 2023 Special Features: (from preliminary study or prior experience) Accidents locations: N/A Sight distance: N/A Queuing: N/A Access location & configuration: N/A Traffic control: MUTCD Signal system location & progression needs: N/A On -site parking needs: N/A Data Sources: Collier County traffic counts and 2021 AUIR Base maps: N/A Prior study reports: N/A Access policy and jurisdiction: N/A Review process: N/A Requirements: N/A N/A 5 Miscellaneous: — Small Scale Study — No Fee i Minor Study - $750.00 Major Study - $1,500.00 Y Methodology Fee $500 X Includes 0 intersections Additional Intersections - $500.00 each 1111 fees will be agreed to during the Methodology meeting and must be pair! to Transportation prior to our sign -off on the application. SIGNATURES Normain.Trebl, omC z Study Preparer—Norman Trebilcock Reviewer(s) Applicant Page 5 of 6 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 25 Packet Pg. 854 9.A.4.c Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA — Traffic Impact Statement — February 2023 Collier County Traffic Impact Study Review Fee Schedule Fees will be paid incrementally as the development proceeds: Methodology Review, Analysis Review, and Sufficiency Reviews. Fees for additional meetings or other optional services are also provided below. Methodolosy Review - $500 Fee Methodology Review includes review of a submitted methodology statement, including review of submitted trip generation estimate(s), distribution, assignment, and review of a "Small Scale Study" determination, written approval/comments on a proposed methodology statement, and written confirmation of a re -submitted, amended methodology statement, and one meeting in Collier County, if needed. "Small Scale Study" Review - No Additional Fee (Includes one sufficiency review) Upon approval of the methodology review, the applicant may submit the study. The review includes: a concurrency determination, site access inspection and confirmation of the study compliance with trip generation, distribution and maximum threshold compliance. "Minor Study Review" - $750 Fee (Includes one sufficiency review) Review of the submitted traffic analysis includes: optional field visit to site, confirmation of trip generation, distribution, and assignment, concurrency determination, confirmation of committed improvements, review of traffic volume data collected/assembled, review of off -site improvements within the right-of-way, review of site access and circulation, and preparation and review of "sufficiency" comments/questions. "Maio- Study Review" - $1,500 Fee (Includes two intersection analysis and two sufficiency reviews Review of the submitted traffic analysis includes: field visit to site, confirmation of trip generation, special trip generation and/or trip length study, distribution and assignment, concurrency determination, confirmation of committed improvements, review of traffic volume data collected/assembled, review of traffic growth analysis, review of off -site roadway operations and capacity analysis, review of site access and circulation, neighborhood traffic intrusion issues, any necessary improvement proposals and associated cost estimates, and preparation and review of up to two rounds of "sufficiency" comments/questions and/or recommended conditions of approval. "Additional intersection Review" - $500 Fee The review of additional intersections shall include the same parameters as outlined in the "Major Study Review" and shall apply to each intersection above the first two intersections included in the "Major Study Review" "Additional Sufficiency Reviews" - $500 Fee Additional sufficiency reviews beyond those initially included in the appropriate study shall require the additional Fee prior to the completion of the review. Page 6 of 6 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 26 Packet Pg. 855 9.A.4.c Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA —Traffic Impact Statement —February 2023 Appendix C. ITE Trip Generation Calculations Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 27 Packet Pg. 856 9.A.4.c Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA — Traffic Impact Statement — February 2023 ITE Trip Generation Manual 111h Ed. — Church Use — Trip Generation Comparison Land Use: 560 Church Description A church is a building in which public worship services are held. A church houses an assembly hall or sanctuary. It may also house meeting rooms, classrooms, and, occasionally, dining, catering, or event facilities. Synagogue (Land Use 561) and mosque (Land Use 562) are related uses. Additional Data Worship services are typically held on Sundays. Some of the surveyed churches offered day care or extended care programs during the week. The sites were surveyed in the 1980s, the 1990s, the 2000s, and the 2010s in Alberta (CAN), California, Colorado, Florida, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Texas, and Virginia. Source Numbers 169, 170, 423, 428, 436, 554, 571, 583, 629, 631, 704, 903, 904, 957, 971, 981, 1080 466 Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition • Volume 4 Trebilcock ConsUlting Solutions, PA 7 Page 128 Packet Pg. 857 9.A.4.c Emmanuel Lutheran Church - GMPA/PUDA - Traffic Impact Statement - February 2023 PERIOD SETTING Analysis Name: Daily Project Name: Church - Traffic Comparison No: Date: 12/2/2021 City: State/Province: Zip/Postal Code: Country: Client Name: Analyst's Name: Edition: Trip Generation Manual, 11th Ed Land Use Independent Size Variable Time Period Method 560 - Church (General 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 90(0) Weekday Average Urban/Suburban) 7.6 560 - Church -1 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 65(0) Weekday Average (General 7.6 Urban/Suburban) 560 - Church - 2 Seats 1000 Weekday Average (General 0.9 Urban/Suburban) (0) indicates size out of range. (1) indicates small sample size, use carefully, PERIOD SETTING Entry Exit Total 3420) 3420) 6840 ) 50% 50% 2470) 2470) 4940) 50% 50% 4500) 4500) 9000) 50% 50% Analysis Name: AM Peak Hour Project Name: Church - Traffic Comparison No: Date: 12/2/2021 City: State/Province: Zip/Postal Code: Country: Client Name: Analyst's Name: Edition: Trip Generation Manual, 11th Ed Land Use Independent Size Time Period Method Variable 660 -Church (General 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 90 Weekday, Peak Average Urban/Suburban) Hour of Adjacent 0.32 Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. 560 - Church -1 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 65 Weekday, Peak Average (General Hour of Adjacent 0.32 Urban/Suburban) Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 Entry Exit Total 18 11 29 62% 38% 13 8 21 62% 38% a.m. 560 - Church - 2 Seats 1000(0) Weekday, Peak Average 420) 280) 700) (General Hour of Adjacent 0.07 60% 40% Urban/Suburban) Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. I (0) Indicates size out of range. (1) indicates small sample size, use carefully. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 129 Packet Pg. 858 9.A.4.c Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA — Traffic Impact Statement — February 2023 PERIOD SETTING Analysis Name: PM Peak Hour Project Name : Church - Traffic Comparison No: Date: 12/2/2021 City: State/Province: Zip/Postal Code: Country: Client Name: Analyst's Name: Edition: Trip Generation Manual, 11th Ed Land Use Independent Size Time Period Method Entry Exit Total Variable 560 - Church (General 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 90 Weekday, Peak Average 19 25 44 Urban/Suburban) Hour of Adjacent 0.49 43% 57% Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. 560 - Church -1 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 65 Weekday, Peak Average 14 18 32 (General Hour of Adjacent 0.49 44% 56% Urban/Suburban) Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. p s 560 - Church - 2 Seats 1000(0) Weekday, Peak Average 450) 550) 1000 ) (General Hour of Adjacent 0.1 45% 55% Urban/Suburban) Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. (0) indicates size out of range. (1) indicates small sample size, use carefully. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 30 Packet Pg. 859 9.A.4.c Emmanuel Lutheran Church - GMPA/PUDA -Traffic Impact Statement - February 2023 ITE Trip Generation Manual 11th Ed. - School Use - Trip Generation Comparison Land Use: 532 Private School (K 12) Description A private school (K 12) serves students attending kindergarten through the 12th grade. The school may also offer pre -kindergarten classes and extended care and day care. Students may travel a long distance from their residence to the private school. Elementary school (Land Use 520), middle school/junior high school (Land Use 522), high school (Land Use 525), private school (K-8) (Land Use 530), private high school (Land Use 534), charter elementary school (Land Use 536), and charter school (K 12) (Land Use 538) are related uses. Additional Data Some of the schools included in this land use provided bus service. One study reported that carpooling was used instead of bus service. The sites were surveyed in the 1980s, the 1990s, the 2000s, and the 2010s in Delaware, Florida, Maryland, Montana, Oregon, Texas, and Washington. Source Numbers 283, 355, 370, 536, 571, 613,906 "17 General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 400-799) 395 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 31 Packet Pg. 860 9.A.4.c Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA —Traffic Impact Statement — February 2023 Land Use: 538 Charter School (K 12) Description A charter school (K-12) is a school that is publicly funded and privately managed. The school serves students attending kindergarten through the 12th grade. The school may also offer extended care and day care. Elementary school (Land Use 520), middle school/junior high school (Land Use 522), high school (Land Use 525), private school (K 8) (Land Use 530), private school (K-12) (Land Use 532), private high school (Land Use 534), and charter elementary school (Land Use 536) are related uses. Additional Data The sites were surveyed in the 2010s in Minnesota and Nevada. Source Numbers 1039,1047 107, General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 400-799) 425 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 32 Packet Pg. 861 9.A.4.c Emmanuel Lutheran Church - GMPA/PUDA- Traffic Impact Statement- February 2023 PERIOD SETTING Analysis Name: AM Peak Hour of Generator Project Name: School Comparison Public vs No: Private Date: 2/14/2022 City: State/Province: Zip/Postal Code: Country: Client Name: Analyst's Name: Edition: Trip Generation Manual, 11th Ed Land Use Independent Size Time Period Method Entry Exit Total Variable 532 - Private School Students 450 Weekday, AM Best Fit (LIN) 231 135 366 (K-12) (General Peak Hour of T = 0.76 (X)+24.37 63% 37% Urban/Suburban) Generator 538 - Charter School Students 450 Weekday, AM Best Fit (LIN) 175(0) 155(0) 330(0) (K-12) (General Peak Hour of T = 1.06 (X)+-146.78 53% 47% Urban/Suburban) Generator (0) indicates small sample size, use carefully. PERIOD SETTING Analysis Name: PM Peak Hour of Generator Project Name: School Comparison Public vs No Private Date: 2/14/2022 City: State/Province: Zip/Postal Code: Country: Client Name: Analyst's Name: Edition: Trip Generation Manual, 11th Ed Land Use Independent Size Time Period Method Entry Exit Total Variable 532 - Private School Students 450 Weekday, PM Best Fit (LIN) 115(0) 158(0) 273(0) (K-12) (General Peak Hour of T = 0.41 (X)+88.78 42% 58% Urban/Suburban) Generator 538 - Charter School Students 450 Weekday, PM Best Fit (LIN) 91(0) 90(0) 181(0 (K-12) (General Peak Hour of T = 0.92 (X)+-232.86 50% 50% Urban/Suburban) Generator (0) indicates small sample size, use carefully. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 133 Q Packet Pg. 862 9.A.4.c Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA —Traffic Impact Statement— February 2023 Approved CFPUD — Ordinance 2011-23 —Approved Trip Cap EXHIBIT "F" DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS FOR THE PROJECT EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH COMMUNITY FACILITIES PUD 1. TRANSPORTATION A. For services and other periods and events of significant traffic generation, as determined by Collier County staff, the property owner shall provide traffic control by law enforcement or a law enforcement approved service provider as directed by Collier County staff, with staffing and at location(s) as directed by the Collier County Transportation Administrator or his designee. B. The development within this project shall be limited to 666 unadjusted two-way, AM peak hour trips and/or 323 unadjusted two-way, PM peak hour trips; allowing for flexibility in the proposed uses without creating unforeseen impacts on the adjacent roadway network. For purposes of calculation of the weekday AM and PM peak hour trip generation for this PUD, the lesser of the weekday AM or PM peak hour trips as calculated in the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Report, titled Trip Generation, 8°i Edition or the trip generation as calculated in the then current ITE Trip Generation Report shall be utilized. C. A potential for interconnection with the residential properties to the west shall be provided if the subject property develops only with single family uses and the conditions for the use of the interconnection are acceptable to the developer and the residential properties to the west. If the subject property is developed without residential uses within four years of the date of adoption, then this commitment shall no longer be deemed applicable. 2. ENVIRONMENTAL A. Conservation/preservation areas comprising a minimum of 0.26 acres are shown on the CFPUD Master Plan that meets the minimum of 0.26f acres required to be preserved by the LDC. B. As part of the first development order application (SDP, Plat or other), the applicant shall provide an updated listed species survey to show the property's proximity to bear or panther habitat (primary or secondary) and indicate if any mitigation is required by the FWC/USFWS. If mitigation is required, the applicant shall coordinate said mitigation with County Environmental Staff members. Emmanuel Eangelical Lwhcran Church PUDZ.PL2009.24% Lam revised: 04-25.11 Page 10 of 10 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 134 Packet Pg. 863 9.A.4.c Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA —Traffic Impact Statement — February 2023 Approved CFPUD — ITE Trip Generation Manual, 81h Ed. — Per TIS dated 4-27-10 TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. IV. TRIP GENERATION Trip generation was determined by referencing the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) report, titled Trip Generation, 8th Edition. Land Use Code 560 (Church) was utilized for the trip generation purposes of the church related uses. For the weekday peak hour church traffic, the square footage of floor area was utilized for trip generation purposes due to the lack of data based on the number of seats. However, for the Sunday peak hour analysis, the number of seats was assumed as the independent variable for trip generation purposes. For the school use, Land Use Code 536 (Private School K-12) was utilized. For the Daycare facility, Land Use Code 565 (Day Care Center) was utilized and for the office uses, Land Use Code 710 (General Office) was utilized. It should be noted that the offices will be utilized by the Church during the weekday. However, in order to maintain the most flexibility with the floor area, the space was analyzed as separate office uses. Table 2 indicates the trip generation of the uses proposed as part of the re -zoning application, and Table 3 indicates the trip generation of the church during the Sunday peak hour of the church uses. Table 2 Emmanuel Lutheran site F.victi— Chi —ph — WPekl1nv Trin G'eneratinn AM Peak Hour 7TPM Peak Hour Daily Lana Use In F Out Total I In I Out Total (2-way) Church 22 14 36 13 14 27 592 (65,000 s . FL.) Private School 223 142 365 33 44 77 1,116 450 Students Day Care 119 105 224 93 104 197 1,359 300 Students) Office _ 36 5 41 4 18 22 310 (15,000 s.tJ Total Trips 400 266 666 143 180 323 3,377 Page 4 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 135 Packet Pg. 864 9.A.4.c Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA — Traffic Impact Statement — February 2023 Approved CFPUD — ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Ed. Land Use: 565 Day Care Center Description A day care center is a facility where care for pre-school age children is provided, normally during daytime hours. A day care facility generally includes classrooms, offices, eating areas, and playgrounds. A center may also provide after -school care for school -age children. Additional Data The technical appendices provide supporting information on time -of -day distributions for this land use. The appendices can be accessed through either the ITETripGen web app or the trip generation resource page on the ITE website (https://www.ite.org/technical-resources/topics/trip: and-parkin,�.:generation/). The sites were surveyed in the 1980s, the 1990s, the 2000s, and the 2010s in California, Florida, Georgia, Maryland, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and Wisconsin. Source Numbers 169, 208, 216, 253, 335, 336, 337, 355, 418, 423, 536, 550, 562, 583, 633, 734, 866, 869, 877, 878, 954, 959, 981 508 Trip Generation Manual 11 th Edition • Volume 4 „`_ Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 136 Packet Pg. 865 9.A.4.c Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA — Traffic Impact Statement — February 2023 Land Use: 710 General Office Building Description A general office building is a location where affairs of businesses, commercial or industrial organizations, or professional persons or firms are conducted. An office building houses multiple tenants that can include, as examples, professional services, insurance companies, investment brokers, a banking institution, a restaurant, or other service retailers. A general office building with a gross floor area of 10,000 square feet or less is classified as a small office building (Land Use 712). Corporate headquarters building (Land Use 714), single tenant office building (Land Use 715), medical -dental office building (Land Use 720), office park (Land Use 750), research and development center (Land Use 760), and business park (Land Use 770) are additional related uses. Additional Data If two or more general office buildings are in close physical proximity (within a close walk) and function as a unit (perhaps with a shared parking facility and common or complementary tenants), the total gross floor area or employment of the paired office buildings can be used for calculating the site trip generation. If the individual buildings are isolated or not functionally related to one another, trip generation should be calculated for each building separately. For study sites with reported gross floor area and employees, an average employee density of 3.3 employees per 1,000 square feet GFA (or roughly 300 square feet per employee) has been consistent through the 1980s, 1990s, and 2000s, No sites counted in the 2010s reported both GFA and employees. The average building occupancy varies considerably within the studies for which occupancy data were provided. The reported occupied gross floor area was 88 percent for general urban/suburban sites and 96 percent for the center city core and dense multi -use urban sites. The technical appendices provide supporting information on time -of -day distributions for this land use. The appendices can be accessed through either the ITETripGen web app or the trip generation resource page on the ITE website (httPs.//www.ite:ory/technical:resources/topics/trip: and: parkin.�,.generation/). The average numbers of person trips per vehicle trip at the eight center city core sites at which both person trip and vehicle trip data were collected are as follows: • 2.8 during Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, one hour between 7 and 9 a.m. • 2.9 during Weekday, AM Peak Hour of Generator • 2.9 during Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, one hour between 4 and 6 p.m. • 3.0 during Weekday, PM Peak Hour of Generator 916=7 General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 400-799) 707 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 37 Packet Pg. 866 9.A.4.c Emmanuel Lutheran Church - GMPA/PUDA - Traffic Impact Statement - February 2023 The average numbers of person trips per vehicle trip at the 18 dense multi -use urban sites at which both person trip and vehicle trip data were collected are as follows: • 1.5 during Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, one hour between 7 and 9 a.m. • 1.5 during Weekday, AM Peak Hour of Generator • 1.5 during Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, one hour between 4 and 6 p.m. • 1.5 during Weekday, PM Peak Hour of Generator The average numbers of person trips per vehicle trip at the 23 general urban/suburban sites at which both person trip and vehicle trip data were collected are as follows: • 1.3 during Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, one hour between 7 and 9 a.m. • 1.3 during Weekday, AM Peak Hour of Generator • 1.3 during Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, one hour between 4 and 6 p.m. • 1.4 during Weekday, PM Peak Hour of Generator The sites were surveyed in the 1980s, the 1990s, the 2000s, the 2010s, and the 2020s in Alberta (CAN), California, Colorado, Connecticut, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ontario (CAN)Pennsylvania, Texas, Utah, Virginia, and Washington. Source Numbers 161, 175, 183, 184, 185, 207, 212, 217, 247, 253, 257, 260, 262, 273, 279, 297, 298, 300, 301, 302, 303, 304, 321, 322, 323, 324, 327, 404, 407, 408, 419, 423, 562, 734, 850, 859, 862, 867, 869, 883, 884, 890, 891, 904, 940, 944, 946, 964, 965, 972, 1009, 1030, 1058, 1061 708 Trip Generation Manual 111h Edition • Volume 4 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA K= Page 1 38 Packet Pg. 867 Emr7ranue� Lutheran Church - GMPAIPUDA - Traffic f is Jmpo it -Statement - February 2023 Project Name Emmanuel Church - Current PUD - ITE 11th Ed No: Date: 12=021 City: . StwalProvince: ZlpIPoalel Code: Country: CNaM Name: Analyara Name: Edl6on: Trip Generation Manual, 111h Ed { WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR LAND USE SIZE Entry Exlt Entry Exit Entry Exit 560-Churah(General Urban/Suburban) 65 (f) 247 247 13 8 14 18 Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0�: Internal 0 0 0 0 0 0 fff i Pass -by 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ncr"assby 247 247 13 8 14 18 SU - Private Sonnet (K-12) (General Urbanl$tdttabsn) 450 M 558 558 224 132 33 44 Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 Internal 0 0 0 0 0 0_ Pass -by 0 0 0 0 0 0 Non -pass -by 558 558 224 132 33 44 565 - Day Can Center (General Urban/Suburban) 300 M 614 613 124 110 111 126 Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 Internal 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -by 0 0 0 0 0 0 �.. Non -pass -by 614 613 124 110 111 125 710 - General Office Building (General Urban/Suburban) 15 n% 112 II 111 29 4 6 28 Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 Internal 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -by 0 0 0 0 0 0 Na-pass-by 112 111 29 4 5 28 Total 1531 1 390 2 164 I 21 i; Total Reduction 0 I 0 0 0 0 0' '.. Total Internal 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Past -by 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total NonVaocby 1531 'I 1529 390 254 154 216 Str+0on� FE GAi (2) F Trebili=ock Cflnsuhing SoIAID ns, PA Page 119 Packet Pg. 868 9.A.4.c Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA — Traffic Impact Statement — February 2023 PERIOD SETTING Analysis Name: Weekday Project Name: Emmanuel Church - Current No: PUD - ITE 11th Ed Date: 11202021 City: State/Province: Zlp/Postal Code: Country: Client Name: Analyst's Name: Edition: Trip Generation Manual, 11th Ed Land Use Independent Variable Size Time Period Method Entry Exit Total 560 - Church (General 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 65(0) Weekday Average 2470) 2470) 4940) Urban/Suburban) 7.6 50% 50% 532 - Private School Students 450(0) Weekday Average 5580) 5580) 11160) (K-12) (General 2A8 50% 50% Urban/Suburban) 565 - Day Care Center Students 300(0) Weekday Average 614 613 1227 (General 4.09 50% 50% Urban/Suburban) 710 - General Office 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 15 Weekday Best Fit (LOG) 112 111 223 Building (General Ln(T) = 0.87Ln(X) 50% 50% Urban/Suburban) +3.05 (0) indicates size out of range. (1) indicates small sample size, use carefully. PERIOD SETTING Analysis Name: AM Peak Hour Project Name: Emmanuel Church - Current No: PUD - ITE 11th Ed Date: 12/2/2021 City: State/Province: Zip/Postal Code: Country: Client Name: Analyst's Name: Edition: Trip Generation Manual, IIth Ed Land Use Independent Variable Size Time Period Method Entry Exit Total 560 - Church (General 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 65 Weekday, Peak Average 13 8 21 Urban/Suburban) Hour of Adjacent 0.32 62% 38% Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. 532 - Private School Students 450 Weekday, Peak Average 2240) 1320) 3560) (K-12)(General Hour of Adjacent 0.79 63% 37% Urban/Suburban) Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. 565 - Day Care Center Students 300(0) Weekday, Peak Average 124 110 234 (General Hour of Adjacent 0.78 53% 47% Urban/Suburban) Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. 710 - General Office 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 15 Weekday, Peak Best Fit (LOG) 29 4 33 Building (General Hour of Adjacent Ln(T) = 0.86Ln(X) 88% 12% Urban/Suburban) Street Traffic, +1.16 One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. (0) indicates size out of range. (1) indicates small sample size, use carefully. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 140 -% Packet Pg. 869 9.A.4.c Emmanuel Lutheran Church - GMPA/PUDA -Traffic Impact Statement - February 2023 PERIOD SETTING Analysis Name: PM Peak Hour Project Name : Emmanuel Church - Current No: PUD - ITE ll th Ed Date: 121212021 City: State/Province: Zip/Postal Code: Country: Client Name: Analyst's Name: Edition: Trip Generation Manual, 11th Ed Land Use Independent Size Time Period Method Entry Exit Total Variable 560 - Church (General 1000 Sq, Ft. GFA 65 Weekday, Peak Average 14 18 32 Urban/Suburban) Hour of Adjacent 0.49 44% 56% Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. 532 - Private School Students Weekday, Peak Average (K-12) (General Hour of Adjacent 0.17 43% 57% Urban/Suburban) Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. 565 - Day Care Center Students Weekday, Peak Average 111 126 237 (General Hour of Adjacent 0.79 47% 53% Urban/Suburban) Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. 710 - General Office 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 15 Weekday, Peak Best Fit (LOG) 6 28 34 Building (General Hour of Adjacent Ln(T) = 0.83Ln(X) 18% 82% Urban/Suburban) Street Traffic, +1.29 One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. (0) indicates size out of range. (1) Indicates small sample size, use carefully. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 141 Packet Pg. 870 9.A.4.c Emmanuel Lutheran Church - GMPA/PUDA - Traffic Impact Statement - February 2023 Proposed GMPA/PUDA - ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Ed. Land Use: 550 University/College Description This land use includes 4-year universities or colleges that may or may not offer graduate programs. Junior/community college (Land Use 540) and off -campus student apartment (Land Uses 225, 226, 227) are related land uses. Additional Data The trip generation for weekend time periods varied considerably; therefore, caution should be used when applying weekend statistics. Information describing the weekend activities conducted at universities/colleges was not available. To assist in future analysis of this land use, it is important to specify if transit service was available within close proximity to the site. Acreage, floor space, staff, and parking accommodations varied widely with the populations served and the social and economic characteristics of the area; thus, the number of students may be a more reliable independent variable on which to establish trip generation rates. The sites were surveyed in the 1980s, the 1990s, the 2000s, and the 201 Os in Alberta (CAN), California, Oregon, Utah, and Washington. Source Numbers 365, 423, 440, 612, 702, 901, 971 IMF General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 400-799) 449 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 142 Packet Pg. 871 9.A.4.c Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA — Traffic Impact Statement — February 2023 Land Use: 630 Clinic Description A clinic is a facility that provides limited diagnostic and outpatient care but is unable to provide prolonged in-house medical and surgical care. A clinic may have a lab facility and supporting pharmacy but typically does not have the equipment and medical personnel available at an urgent care site. A clinic typically offers a wide range of services which makes it distinct from a medical office building that typically houses specialized or individual physicians. Hospital (Land Use 610), free-standing emergency room (Land Use 650), and medical -dental office building (Land Use 720) are related uses. Specialized Land Use Data collected at a single methadone clinic in New Hampshire in 2021 indicate the likelihood of different trip generation rates than for a general medical clinic. The site gross floor area is 4,300 square feet. The vehicle trip counts are as follows: • Weekday-283 • Weekday, AM peak hour of adjacent street-39 • Weekday, AM peak hour of generator-45 • Weekday, PM peak hour of adjacent street-1 • Saturday-189 • Saturday, peak hour of generator-64 • Sunday-167 • Sunday, peak hour of generator-56 The methadone clinic generates significantly more trips than a clinic during the morning peak periods and significantly fewer trips during the afternoon adjacent street peak period. Additional Data The technical appendices provide supporting information on time -of -day distributions for this land use. The appendices can be accessed through either the ITETripGen web app or the trip generation resource page on the ITE website (jt p.s.//www.ite.org/technical-resources/topics/trip: and:parking:ge neration/). 672 Trip Generation Manual 111h Edition • Volume 4 K= Trebilcocl< Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 143 Packet Pg. 872 9.A.4.c Emmanuel Lutheran Church - GMPA/PUDA - Traffic Impact Statement - February 2023 The average numbers of person trips per vehicle trip at the five general urban/suburban sites at which both person trip and vehicle trip data were collected were as follows: • 1.4 during Weekday, AM Peak Hour of Generator • 1.7 during Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, one hour between 4 and 6 p.m. • 1.5 during Weekday, PM Peak Hour of Generator The sites were surveyed in the 1980s, the 1990s, the 2000s, and the 2010s in Alberta (CAN), California, Minnesota, New Hampshire, Texas, Vermont, and West Virginia. Source Numbers 440, 734, 878, 926, 972, 1049,1062, 1073 "17 General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 400-799) 673 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 144 Packet Pg. 873 9.A.4.c Emmanuel Lutheran Church - GMPA/PUDA - Traffic Impact Statement - February 2023 Land Use: 926 Food Cart Pod Description A food cart pod is a group of food carts or food trucks congregated in an established location, such as a parking lot, on a semi -permanent or regular basis. A food cart pod typically operates during both the lunch and dinner timeframes. A food cart pod often includes limited covered seating or a dining area. A food cart pod may also include the sale of alcoholic beverages. Additional Data All data were collected in the summer months. Most sites were located along public transit routes and some were accessible by bike or multi -use paths. The independent variable "food cart" is defined for the purpose of this land use as the number of food carts open at the time of the study. The sites were surveyed in the 201 Os in Oregon. Source Number 919 General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 500-999) 633 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 145 Packet Pg. 874 9.A.4.c Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA—Traffic Impact Statement— February 2023 PERIOD SETTING V DATA PROVIDED BY ITE Specify the Independent Variable, Time Period, and Calculation Method to be used in the calculation of the number of Trips generated in the analysis. To record any notes, click Add Notes above. PROJECTNAME: EMMANUEL CHURCH -PROPOSED PUD-ITE IITH ANALYSIS NAME: Weekday 1 LAND USE INDEPENDENT SIZE VARIABLE LOCATION TIME PERIOD METHOD ENTRY EXIT TOTAL 560-Church Seste �1000 General Weekday Averege �0450(1) 450(1) 900(1) Urban/Suburban 0.9 532 - Private School (K-12) Students �450(0) General Weekday Average _ _. Q558(1) --- 558(1) 1116(1) Urban/Suburban 248 565 - Day Care Center Students v 200 General Urban/Suburban Weekday Average " 409 409 818 4.09 710 -General Office Building 1000Sq. FL GFA v 15 General Urban/Suburban Weekday as Fit (LOG) —� 112 111 223 n ) = 0.87Ln X) + 3.05 630 - Clinic 1000 Sq. FL GFA v 3.6 General Weekday v Best Fit (LIN) 82 82 164 Urban/Suburban — T = 35.86(X) + 34.88 550 - University/College o Students v 300() General Urban/Suburban Weekday —4Aversge __ -v2340) 2340) 4680) t T— 1.56 926 - Food Cart Pod Food Carts v 4 General Select One SOne 1123 123 246 ated UrbaNSuburban -- (0) indicates size out of range. LUC 926 - no ITE data far Weekday time period; (1) Indicates small sample size, use carefully. Weekday rate assumed 10 x PM peak hour rate (6.16) = 61.6, Distribution 50%150% PERIOD SETTING DATA PROVIDED BY ITE Specify the Independent Variable, Time Period, and Calculation Method to be used in the calculation of the number of Trips generated in the analysis. To record any notes, click - Add Notes above. PROJECTNAME: EMMANUEL CHURCH -PROPOSED PUD-ITE IITH ANALYSIS NAME: AM Peak Hour LAND USE INDEPENDENT VARIABLE SIZE LOCATION TIME PERIOD METHOD ENTRY EXIT TOTAL 560 - Church Seats �0()0(0) Weekday Peak Hou Average a 420) 280) 700) Urban/SuburbanGeneral 0.07 532 -Private School K-12 ( ) Students �. 450 �� General r Weekday, Peak Hou y _ Average 02240) 1320) 3560) UrbaNSuburban l 0.79 565 - Day Care Center Students v 200 General Weekday, Peak Hou Average O 83 73 156 UrbaNSuburban 0.78 710 -Genersl Office Building 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 15 General Weekday, Peak Hou Best Fit (LOG) " 29 4 33 Urban/Suburban = 0.86Ln X + 1.16 630 - Clingy - l 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA �� 3.6 General Weekday, Peak Hou Best Fit (LIN) 14 3 17 Urban/Suburban 19, 868 550 -University/Collage v 300(o) [Students_--_____.._.__... General Weekday, Peak Hou Averse d 35 10 45 UrbaNSuburban _....._...._.__...._._______— 0.15 926 Food Carl Pod Carts v) 4 Food Carts General elect One Select One v 13 12 25 - t _ (0) indicates size out of range. LUC 926-no ITE data for AM Peak Hour of the Adjacent Street time period; (1) indicates small sample we, use carefully. JAM peak hour rate assumed equal to PM peak hour rate = 6.16; Distribution 50%150% Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 46 Packet Pg. 875 9.A.4.c Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA — Traffic Impact Statement — February 2023 PERIOD SETTING ✓ DATA PROVIDED BY ITE Specify the Independent Variable, Time Period, and Calculation Method to be used in the calculation of the number of Trips generated in the analysis. To record any notes, click , Add Notes above. PROJECTNAME: EMMANUEL CHURCH -PROPOSED PUD -ITE 11TH ANALYSIS NAME: (ph" Peak Hour LAND USE INDEPENDENT SIZE VARIABLE LOCATION TIME PERIOD METHOD ENTRY EXIT TOTAL 560 - Church is " 000(i) Urban/Suburban General lrban Weekday, Peak Hou Average " 0 45(2) 55(2) 100(2) 0.1 532 - Private School (K-12) Students gs0(1) General (weekday, Peak Hou Averege� 33t2) Urban/Suburban 44t2) 77(2) 0.17 565 - Day Care Center Students 200 General Weekday, Peak Hou Average 74 UrbanlSuburban 84 158 0.79 - General Office Building 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA v 15 General Best Fit (LOG) to Weekday, Peak Hou 6 Urban/Suburban, 28 34 --____��) = 0.83LnLX) + 1.29 630 - Clinic 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 3.6 General Best Fit (LIN) Weekday, Peak Hou 5 UrbaNSuburban 11 16 T=3.53X +2.98 550 - University/College l Studer><s v� 3p0 J General ( Weekday, Peak Hou Average d 14 Urban/Suburban l 31 45 v 926 -Food Cart Pod Food Carts 4 _ _ 0.15 r General ekdayAverage We , Peak Hou - NIA NIA Urban/Suburban6.16 25(p ) 12 13 (0) indicates directional distribution was not provided in the source document. This study cannot be used for trip distributlon. LUC 926 - Directional Distribution assumed 50%/50% (1) Indicates size out of range. (2) indicates small sample size, use carefully. Proposed GMPA/PUDA - ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Ed. —Church Sunday Peak Hour of Generator PERIOD SETTING Analysis Name: Sunday Peak Hour of Generator Project Name: Emmanuel - Church - Sunday No Generator Date: 2/17/2023 City: State/Province: Zip/Postal Code: Country: Client Name: Analysts Name: Edition: Trip Generation Manual, 11th Ed Land Use Independent Size Time Period Method Entry Exit Total Variable 560 - Church (General 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 65 Sunday, Peak Average 323 350 673 Urban/Suburban) Hour of 10.36 48% 52% Generator 560 - Church - 1 Seats 1000 Sunday, Peak Average 250 260 510 (General Hour of 0.51 49% 51% Urban/Suburban) Generator Page 147 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Packet Pg. 876 9.A.4.c Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA — Traffic Impact Statement — February 2023 Appendix D Collier County Transportation Element Map - TR 3.0 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 48 Packet Pg. 877 9.A.4.c L 1. CITY OFI BON ITA SPRINGS INSET 1 • I CITY {Ff' N(PL$S Page 49 LEE COUNTY � � .� 1 COLLIER COUNTY ORANGETREE )NITA SPRINGS INSET 2 3 -" -" INSET ,CITY OF f MARCO I ISLAND I: INSETS } GULF OF MEXICO Q a 0 v O N N N O W E 1 O O S N ;ALEE 0 1 2 4 6 B O o t== )_Miles J i a � S INSET 3 a O o LEi 2 00 ti {---------- N v 1 1 1 rl N HENDRY COUNTY 1 COLDER COUNTY 1 V) .N i 1 1 •' 1 LEGEND 1 - INTERSTATE OTHER FREEWAYS AND EXPRESSWAYS O OTHER PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL (V Z; MINOR ARTERIAL C 1 u MAJOR COLLECTOR O MINOR COLLECTOR �C LOCAL cm Ou is 0 2010 SMOOTHED URBANIZED BOUNDARY J 1 i Q 2010 SMOOTHED SMALL URBAN BOUNDARY a. • RECOMMENDED BY: EC •L ' COLLIER COUNTY MPO I-=` uO OBI DTTC r� I C FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF .� I• Iv W}` TRANSPORTATION DATE C 0. APPROVED BY: 1 t ` ` / FEDERAL HIGHWAY Id U .................................................................. ADMINISTRATION DATE m FDOT DISTRICT ONE - MAP B1 FEDERAL FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION / URBAN BOUNDARIES - COLLIER COUNTY FTE t X 10/31/2013 W r C d E t tv r w a Packet Pg. 878 9.A.4.c Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA — Traffic Impact Statement — February 2023 Appendix E Collier County Access Management Policy - Table 1 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 150 Packet Pg. 879 9.A.4.c Emmanuel Lutheran Church GMPA/PUDA -Traffic Impact Statement - February 2023 Table 1 Access Classification and Standards Access Facility Features (Median Treatment Minimum Connection Minimum Median Opening Minimum Signal Class and Access Roads) Spacing (feet)(2)(3) Directional Full (feet)(2) Spacing (mile)(2) (feet)(2) 1 Limited Access N/A NIA 2 Controlled Access 1320 / 600 1320 .. :........ Ait:ros,pivi5 ecL ...........6PQ� 3�Q� ......... rN0......... 13 ......... �u5... . 4 Arterials, undivided 660 / 330 N/A 5 Arterials, divided 330 / 220 440 6 Arterials, undivided 330 / 220 N/A 7 Arterials, divided and undivided 125 330 Notes: (Greater than or equal to 45 mph/less than 45 mph) (1) Section Four of this Policy contains supplementary and more detailed instruction for use of these standards. (2) These minimum spacing standards may not be adequate if auxiliary lanes and storage is required. (3) Single properties with frontages exceeding the minimum spacing criteria may not necessarily receive permits for the maximum number of possible connections. Page 51 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Packet Pg. 880 9.A.4.c Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA — Traffic Impact Statement — February 2023 Appendix F Project Turning Movements Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 52 Packet Pg. 881 9.A.4.c Oil Well Rd — Oil Well Rd Fmmonue) Lutheran Church -C+14 PAIPUDH - Troffic tmpoct StaferMerif-February2023 Project Turning Movements By Percentage and by AM Peak Hour (Maximum Traffic Potential) [15%;661 [Enter Trips r15%; 39)][Exit Trips ] 50%; 22S92) Z �35%; 154 �- Oil well Rd oil win Rd - -Oil Well Rd 0 _ 011 Well Rd B l r (50%;131) (35%; r f Emmanuel v 1 Community Park 1 z 1 m 1 r n 1 Z CollierM bile Auto Repa�' lnc 3-Ave NE 31VM.NE 3151'A-NE 3U Ave NE 31s1AVQNE _31e1Ave NE_ 31W Ave NE Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA p;;a; g; �7-M Packet Pg. 882 9.A.4.c POTABLE WATER AND WASTEWATER INTERIM FACILITIES/SYSTEM AGREEMENT Packet Pg. 883 9.A.4.c Form 1 - Rev. 2004 (Interim Facilities/System Agreement) POTABLE WATER and WASTEWATER INTERIM FACILITIES/SYSTEM AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of _, 20 , by and between Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples, Inc., a Florida Not -For -Profit corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Developer"), and THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY, AND AS THE EX-OFFICIO GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT (hereinafter referred to as "County"). Developer is used as singular or plural, as the context requires. RECITALS: WHEREAS, for the purposes of this Agreement the term "Developer" shall include the Developer, the Developer's heirs, successors, and assigns, including, but not limited to, any wholly owned or controlled subsidiary entity; and WHEREAS, the Developer is the Owner of the Emmanuel Lutheran Church Community Services CFPUD development, (hereinafter "Project") and shall submit construction plans for an interim potable water and wastewater treatment facility (hereinafter "interim treatment facility") to the County for review and approval; and WHEREAS, the Developer acknowledges and agrees that the Developer desires to provide on- site interim utility systems to service the Project until such time as the utility systems within the Project may be connected to the off -site utility systems operated by the County or District and the County systems have adequate capacity to service the Project; and WHEREAS, Collier County land development regulations require, and Developer covenants and agrees, that the Developer shall connect any interim utility system serving that Project to the off -site utility system owned and operated by the County when the County's system has been extended to within two hundred (200) feet of the Project's boundary and the County has determined that the off -site utility system has adequate capacity to service the entire Project; and WHEREAS, the extension of the off -site utility system owned and operated by the County to within two hundred (200) feet of the boundary of the Project shall be not required of the County as performance under 1 Packet Pg. 8 47 9.A.4.c this Agreement; and WHEREAS, all parties to this Agreement acknowledge and agree that the decision as to whether or not any off -site utility system owned and operated by the County has the capacity to service the Project shall be made solely by the County; and WHEREAS, the Developer acknowledges its obligation to dedicate all facilities, including all appropriate collection, distribution and transmission systems or portion(s) thereof and appropriate easements to the County prior to interconnection of the facilities/system to County or District's system; and WHEREAS, the Developer, or other successor entity satisfactory to the County, will maintain and operate the interim facility and the associated on -site collection, distribution and transmission system(s) as set forth herein below; and WHEREAS, the developer has previously accepted the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement as part of the County's review and approval of the Developer's land use petitions. WITNESSETH: NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants hereinafter contained the parties agree as follows: herein. RECITALS INCORPORATED. The above Recitals are true and correct and shall be incorporated INTERIM FACILITY. The appropriate on -site treatment facilities, and collection, distribution and transmission systems are to be constructed as a part of the proposed Project and shall be an interim system; all utility systems or portion(s) thereof shall be constructed in compliance with all applicable State, Federal and local standards, the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC), this Ordinance, as well as the Utilities Standards Manual, and are to be owned, operated and maintained by the Developer, or other successor entity satisfactory to the County, until such time as the County's off -site utility systems are available to service the project. The interim system shall supply services to this Project only or, subject to the County's approval, other adjacent or near -by lands owned by the Developer. The interim system may not provide service outside the Project without the expressed written consent of the Collier County Water - Sewer District and only to the extent of such written consent. 2 Packet Pg. 885 9.A.4.c 3. DEVELOPER TO DISMANTLE INTERIM TREATMENT FACILITY. Upon connection to the County's off -site utility systems, the Developer shall abandon, dismantle and remove from the site the interim treatment facility. All costs related to this activity shall be borne solely by the developer and performed in accordance with FDEP standards. 4. CONNECTION TO COUNTY'S UTILITY SYSTEM SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED AT NO COST TO COUNTY. The Developer shall, at no cost to the COUNTY, make connection to the County's off -site utility system(s) within two (2) years of notification that such systems have become available. Costs of connection shall include, whenever the County requires, but not be limited to, engineering design, preparation of construction documents, permitting, modification or retrofitting of existing pumping facilities, construction of new pumping facilities, interconnection with County off -site utility systems, any transmission, distribution or collection lines necessary to make the connection and any required environmental audits, including the expense of bringing the subject system(s) or portion(s) thereof into compliance as well as any and all costs for clean-up, removal or remediation. 5. CONVEYANCE OF INTERIM TREATMENT FACILITIES NECESSARY FOR CONNECTION TO AND OPERATION OF COUNTY'S OFF -SITE UTILITY SYSTEM(S). At which time as the County's off -site system(s) becomes available for connection of the Project, all utility facilities required by the County in order to make such connection shall be conveyed to the County in accordance with County Ordinances, rules and regulations then in effect, together with all utility easements required by the County. All construction plans and technical specifications related to the connection to the County's utility systems shall be submitted to the County for review and approval prior to commencement of construction. The COUNTY, at its option, may require conveyance of facilities internal to the project. 6. CUSTOMER TURNOVER. All customers served on an interim basis by the utility system constructed by the Developer shall become customers of the County at such time as the County's potable water, non -potable irrigation water and/or wastewater systems become available to serve the Project and such connection is made. Prior to connection of the interim utility system serving the Project to the County's off -site utility systems, the Developer shall submit to the County a complete listing of customers served by the interim utility system and shall not compete in any way with the County for the service of those customers. The Developer shall also provide the County with a detailed inventory of the facilities served within the Project, and cooperate fully in the expeditious transfer of any billing procedures. 7. SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGES SHALL BE PAID PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE. 3 Packet Pg. 886 9.A.4.c The Developer shall be responsible for payment of all applicable system development charges in accordance with Ordinance 2001-13, Section 74-303 D: Payment, as then amended or superseded. This requirement shall be made known to all prospective buyers of properties for which building permits will be required, and supplied in writing upon closing of such properties. 8. BINDING EFFECT. This Agreement shall be binding upon the parties, their successors and assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date and year first above written. ATTEST: CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, Clerk M. , Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legality: Jeffrey A. Klatzkow, County Attorney AS TO COUNTY and the COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, on behalf of Collier County, Florida and as Ex-Officio the Governing Body of the Collier County Water -Sewer District. IM Chris Hall, Chairman [SIGNATURES CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE] 0 Packet Pg. 887 9.A.4.c WITNESSES: (Signature) (Print full name) (Signature) (Print full name) STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER number AS TO DEVELOPER: Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples, Inc., a Florida Not -For -Profit Corporation By: Printed Name: Title: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2023, by . as of is [ ] personally known to me, or [ ] has produced driver's license as identification. NOTARY PUBLIC Name: My Commission Expires: 5 Packet Pg. 888 9.A.4.c NIM #2 DOCUMENTS O N N O O O O N O N J d O Lo Co ti N N C O .N d Q' O N N O O O O N O N J IL �L C� G U IL U s m Packet Pg. 889 9.A.4.c ®■ HOLEMONTES a Bowman company August 31, 2023 Nancy Gundlach, AICP, Principal Planner Katherine Eastley, Planner II Growth Management Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Re: Mission Subdistrict GMPA (PL-20200002204) & Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples Community Facilities Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) Amendment (PL-20200002198) Neighborhood Information Meeting #2 HM File No. 2006.096A Dear Ms. Gundlach and Ms. Eastley: Enclosed please find the following documents in accordance with Collier County's Neighborhood Information Meeting requirements: • One (1) copy of Meeting Summary of the NIM; • One (1.) original executed Affidavit of Compliance (signed by Robert Mulhere); • One (1) original Affidavit of Publication; • One (1) copy of the Neighborhood Information Meeting Notice advertisement which ran in the Naples Daily News on July 28, 2023; • One (1) copy of Neighborhood Information Meeting Notification Letter sent to Property Owners on July 28, 2023; • One (1) copy of sign -in sheet from the NIM; • One (1) copy of Property Owners List; and • One (1) flash drive with recording of the NIM. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, HOLE MONTES, A BOWMAN COMPANY Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP Senior Vice President RJM/sek Enclosures as noted. 950 Encore Way, Naples, FL 34110 P: 239.254.2000 holemontes.com I bowman.com H:\2006\2006096A\WP\CFPUD\NIM #2\NG & KE 230931 Itr tr NIM documents.docx Packet Pg. 890 9.A.4.c NIM SUMMARY Mission Subdistrict GMPA (PL-20200002204) Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples CFPUDA (PL-20200002198) Monday, August 14 at 5:30 p.m. Collier County OF/IFAS Extension, Multi -Purpose Room 14700 Immokalee Road, Naples, FL 34120 The NIM was held for the above referenced petitions. The petitions are described as follows: 1) Mission Subdistrict GMPA (PL-20200002204) A Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) to amend the Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Map to add 14.18E acres to the existing Mission Subdistrict, for a total size of 36+. The existing subdistrict allows for a maximum of 90,000 square feet of uses, including a church, childcare services, and a private school. The proposed GMPA retains the maximum 90,000 square foot limitation, and the permitted church, childcare service, and private school uses. The GMPA also proposes to add additional community services, including a maximum of four food trucks, medical office, social services, post -secondary education, and essential and other community -oriented services; and (2) Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples Community Facilities Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) Amendment (PL-20200002198) An amendment to add 14.18E acres to the PUD and allow additional community services within the PUD. The approved PUD allows for a maximum of 90,000 square feet of uses, including a 1,000-seat church, childcare services with a maximum of 300 attendees, and a private school with a maximum of 450 students. The proposed PUD amendment retains the maximum 90,000 square foot limitation, maximum of 1,000 church seats, and maximum of 450 private school students; but reduces the childcare enrollment from 300 to a maximum of 200 attendees. The PUD Amendment also proposes to add additional community services, including a maximum of four food trucks, medical office, social services, post -secondary education, and essential and other community -oriented services. Note: This is a summary of the NIM. An audio and video recording are also provided. Attendees On behalf of Applicants: Howard Issacson, Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples, Inc. (Applicant) Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, President/CEO, Hole Montes, a Bowman Company Richard Yovanovich, Esq., Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. Norman Trebilcock, AICP, PTOE, PE, Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Terry Cole, PE, Hole Montes, a Bowman Company Jeremie Chastain, AICP, Planner III, Hole Montes, a Bowman Company County Staff: Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA, CSM, Planner III, Zoning Services Katherine Eastly, AICP, Planner III, Comprehensive Planning Four members of the public attended. Two members of the public attended via Zoom. Page 1 of 2 HA200612006096A\wMMUMNIM #21NIM Summary (8-15-2023).doex Packet Pg. 891 9.A.4.c Mr. Mulhere started the presentation by introducing himself, the property owner, the other consultants, and county staff. He explained the N1M process, the process for approval, and provided a brief history of the project. The following comments/questions were raised by the members of the public in attendance: Misc. There were questions asked about the proposed access to the property. Mr. Mulhere explained that initially access was proposed to 3 1 " Ave. NE, but that access was removed after feedback received from the public. Mr. Mulhere agreed to include a condition there will be no access to 3 lst Ave. NE in the PUD document. Per County standards, there is a second access point proposed to Oil Well Road. The meeting concluded at approximately 5:45 PM. Page 2 of 2 HA2006\2006096A\WP\CFPUD\NIM #2\NIM Summary (8-15-2023).docx Packet Pg. 892 9.A.4.c AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE I hereby certify that pursuant to Ordinance 2004-41, of the Collier County Land Development Code, I did cause the attached newspaper advertisement to appear and I did give notice by mail to the following property owners and/or condominium and civic associations whose members may be affected by the proposed land use changes of an application request for a rezoning, PUD amendment, or conditional use, at least 15 days prior to the scheduled Neighborhood Information Meeting. For the purposes of this requirement, the names and addresses of property owners shall be deemed those appearing on the latest tax rolls of Collier County and any other persons or entities who have made a formal request of the county to be notified. The said notice contained the laymen's description of the site property of proposed change and the date, time, and place of a Neighborhood Information Meeting. Per the attached letters, property owner's list, and copy of newspaper advertisement which are hereby made a part of this Affidavit of Compliance. (Signature of Applicant) STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing Affidavit of Compliance was acknowledged before me this 151h day of Au ust 2023 by means of V physical presence or online notarization, by Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, Senior Vice President of Hole Montes, a Bowman Company, who is personally known to me iC or who has produced as identification. Signatur of Notary Public I�u,Ua 1 (Notary Seal) PrintedrName of Notary :, STErHANIE IuttOLNotary Public - State of FloridaCommission N GG 965839 E My Comm. Expires Mar 9, 2024onded through National Notary Assn, Ii:\2006\2006096A\WP\CFPUD\NIM N2\Affidavit of Compliance (8-15-2023).doc Packet Pg. 893 9.A.4.c P2R7f7F7HE USATODAY NE ORK Published Daily Naples, FL 34110 HOLE MONTES ASSOCIATES INC 950 ENCORE WAY#200 NAPLES, FL 34110 ATTN STEPHANIE I<AROL Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WISCONSIN COUNTY OF BROWN Before the undersigned authority personally appeared, who on oath says that he or she is the Legal Coordinator of the Naples Daily News, published in Collier County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being a PUBLIC NOTICE, was published on the publicly accessible website of Collier and Lee Counties, Florida, or in a newspaper by print in the Issues of, on: Issue(s) dated: 7/28/2023 Affiant further says that the website or newspaper complies with all legal requirements for publication in chapter 50, Florida Statutes. Subscribed and sworn to before me, by the legal clerk, who is personally Known to me, on July 28th, 2023: otary, tote I, ou f rown My co i on expires: Publication Cost: $1,002.96 Ad No: GC11088980 Customer No: 530712 PO *PUBLIC NOTICE- DISPLAY AD 3X10 # of Affidavits: 1 This is not an invoice _NA NCY HEYRMAN Notary Public State of Wisconsin Packet Pg. 894 9.A.4.c The public is invited to attend a neighborhood information meeting held by Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, Senior Vice President, and Jeremie Chastain, AICP, Planner III of Hole Montes, a Bowman Company, and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire of Coleman Yovanovich & Koester, P.A., on behalf of the applicant at the following time and location: Monday, August 14, 2023 at 5:30 p.m. Collier County UFAFAS Extension, Multi -Purpose Room 14700 Immokalee Road, Naples, FL 34120 The following two concurrent applications have been made to Collier County Growth Management: (1) Mission Subdistrict GMPA (PL-20200002204) A Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) to amend the Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use, Map to add 14.18± acres to the existing Mission Subdistrict, for a total size of 36t' acres. The existing subdistrict allows for a maximum of 90,000 square feet of uses, including a church, childcare services, and a private school. The proposed GMPA retains the maximum 90,000 square foot limitation, and the permitted church, childcare service, and private school uses. The GMPA also proposes to add additional community services, including a maximum of four food trucks, medical office, social services, post -secondary education, and essential and other community -oriented services; and (2) Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples Community Facilities Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) Amendment (PL-20200002198) An amendment to add 14.18t acres to the PUD and allow additional community services within the PUD. The approved PUD allows for a maximum of 90,000 square feet of uses, including a 1,000-seat church, childcare services with a maximum of 300 attendees, and a private school with a maximum of 450 students. The proposed PUD amendment retains the maximum 90,000 square foot limitation, maximum of 1,000 church seats, and maximum of 450 private school students; but reduces the childcare enrollment from 300 to a maximum of 200 attendees. The PUD Amendment also proposes to add additional community services, including a maximum of four food trucks, medical office, social services, post -secondary education, and essential and other community - oriented services. These lands total 36t acres and are located in Section 19, Township 48 South, Range 28 East, Collier County, Florida, on the south side of Oil Well Road, approx. one -quarter mile west of Everglades Blvd. Emmanuel Evange&al Lutheran Church of Naples CFPUDAMtndment& o� MFo rca Mlsslon5ubdlstrkGrowth Management Plan pmendmerit Location Map Business and property owners, residents and visitors are welcome to attend the presentation and discuss the project with the applicant and Collier County staff. Zoom is being provided as an option to those unable to attend the meeting in person. However, if technical difficulties arise with Zoom, the technical difficulties will not be grounds to invalidate the meeting. If you would like to participate via Zoom or view a video of the meeting, please email us at NeighborhoodMeetingQjit�r eng.corn and we will send zoom invite or a link of the video. You may also email any comments or questions to Neighborhood Meeting@hmenq com. Please reference Mission Subdistrict GMPA and Emmanuel Lutheran CFPUD Amendment in subject line. Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, Senior Vice President, Hole Montes, a Bowman Company 950 Encore Way, Naples, FL 34110; Phone: 239-254-2000 email: bobmulhere@hmeng.com Q a 0 N N O 0 0 0 N O N J a 0 Ln Do r- N N C O T d O N N O O O O N O N J a e1S L W 2 U IL U Al m Packet Pg. 895 9.A.4.c IDA I FRIDAY, JULY 28. 20211 NAPLES DAILY NEWS Hospitals Cammned from Page 3A president and chief rxcauilve, officer, said In a news release. 'We are proud to iw recognised by CMS for the high -quality sure wit Pro- vidunie to .or cartunly, mid we are Owllled to have four and Rve.,let. this year,"Anlonuccl sold. I want to cheek everyone on the entire Lae. Health team for thdr dedialion old cumuli D1 nit to excellent patient cote." NCH said scaul,%slid nmintn)ning a four -star rating lu tin stall feel and 'attests the sysletrfs dcdlemhuu lit prD- v(ding high -quality care. 'We .,a Imnolscly proud to receWo this PresO"Nov, ta:ugnlBon front CMS:, Paul Hills, president and chief exeru- live office"Sald In s sacs rehesse. "this four -star rating reallirms our dedica- lian to dellvedng high -quality, pmiuut- centeled care to the individuals and families weserve." NCH's says its emphasla nn cantOhu- .ushnpmverr rand hm alivelime- ,,I, hew beau rdtM'i ],I maintaining Its al(ngs. 'Phis rec.gni0un tmphas us to keep pfwhhfg boundaries and attivlug for excellence In all aspects of our.pare. dots, and is a leslonleld to the lard work and d idle. .is area .... spitilawl Irnl' phyalrlanz, umNON, awl xtell* winmn strive every tiny to daliver the hest possible to to our p.thante;' Dr. Carlos flatware, emafeepaislae oflt- cer,cntd. Phy,kelnu$ Regional apokcswva non .11nney Thonan sold the cyawen re- mains focused an providing hlgb qwl- itg'emµissianale health rare. "Our o w ver1, 8 canmlllmaut to our patients and the Laminunity Is to conlinuously Improve Ile care, our re• admission rates ,,nil patient expodenec we pmvlde,"she said In nn 0111011. Readmission rates are a Imy mea- sure for patients who have chronic can- ditions, She said. "This has bean .n oleo of foa,s for the bealtheam system. Our quallly measures related to r.dn laslon miss arc Improving. That's teal progress slid wit'. going to keep at It," She sold. "fit the area of )salient experlauce, we continuo to focus on best practices for communlculion and service hlcluding bedside shift rc)nr4 hourly rotadhlg Ind fotmding by hospital laidcrsbtp," she added. What class the national data Indicota7 The rating Involves 46 quality mea- sures that CMS publicly capons on Medie..a.gav .,it divides them into [lie livebrnad groups. • Mortality: Measures hoe well hos- pitals plevani deaths. • Ssf.tyof cum: Measures howwell hospitals prevent Infections and other complications. a Readmission: Measures )tow open patients me readmitted within 30 dnyu. n PaUenl Experience: Measums hose patients rate their are. .Ti, iy& EllbOlve Care. Measures how well hospitals provide ate In a limely manner and hoe well they fol- low uldenc.-based guidelines, A hrenkdawn shows that 2501mspl- I.Ic, or 6%, received one star; 668 Ims- It'I,racetved twaatnrs for 14%of the rated hospitals and U72 hospitals re- ceived three slats for 19%. Four stars were (liven to 003 hospil.1, 17% of file total old 483 to - settled Rve stars for 10% of the total natlonwids. A hospitalmay not be able to report data on all mascaras, duo to the nun.. bar or type of patients they treat. This year 1,570 hospital. were not.led. Tile public can took up Individual hospitals at the webslle, at hitim// wivei.medlecare.gov/caure-compare/ Besides Lea Health's two campuse e with live alars, 10 olbor hospitals lU Fiat Ida Am 111he lop category will, five stars, are. ding to Banker's Health Review. They arc: • Meeac Dunedin Hospital (Dunc- dln) . AdventHealth Dayton. Beech (Daytona Beach) • $..set. Memorial H.Plt.l • Daplist Medical Center - Naeml (pamandhm Beach) • Mayo CIIt11c Florida (J.ek—All.) • Cape Canaveral Hospital (Cocoa Beach) • Mallon Plant Masao Heallheam Countryside (Safely Harbor) • Oulf Breeze Hospital (Gulf Breeze) . Vista Hospital (Mclbourlle) • AdventHeulth (Wesley Chapel) Disrupting Dating rum ou,r HOW CALL 1-833-927-9090 NOW ry J' www.madolomatchr.lub.com '! (633)421.0090 Florida toe OmplxP C1.m ; v. MP: Ilan dies after losing control On 1-75 following five -car crash Tomas Radrlguef. U.10ii.mTomaK-lie-A A 25-yeur-old Hialeah man died Wednesday afternoon after authorities say his somitraller ,.a Involved la a Bus-vchide cie sh. Accoding to on Incident report room the Florldu Highway Porol, file wreck happened sound 3:40 pan, vVednes- day along Intcnlmtc 75. near Colonial Boulevard, in Fort Myers. The semitrailer, pulling a Bat -bed Inds" was traveling south in the out. side lane of Inmrslate 75, north of Coloual Boulevard, behind a dump truck all two SU Vs. Troopers said a third SUV was trav- filbng c..(if In the outside center Iona of In(crsml , 75, north of Colonial Roule- Wild. The semllmller rear -ended the dump I luck 'KE.d.rR,..using uehain ohmr-and crashes with tlm two SUVs traveling ahead of IL TroopefE said crash debt[$ file,, struck the Fee, of the third SUV, Inw- eling In tit(: middle little. Therrien driving the semitrailer rued on scene. Trooper$ reported the .tiler four Involved motorists surfaced minor Injuries. At least 51 flotilla have tiled In Lao County croshes this year. Tarnow HudrlgueIr Is o Breaking/blue News Reporter for the Naples Dolly Naas and The Nears -Press. You can reach Tmnns of TRorldguaa@gor eel Leol,l or 772.333.5501. Counsel calf), hill, of Threads 1pfomasfmb hron, IN- stngro. @maosfrobehmn, Facebook (Nlo,ms-14gu—sal, and Miller (ai'omast'ItoOeflr4 n. 1,CSO: Unresponsive electrician working on FMB hotel dies Tomas Rodrlµuaa Fn,1.". Neu -Fuel+ USA mOAv N—ORK -Plus, An electrician working at a pent My- ers Beach hotel died Tuesday ahcr- noon, o cowotker dl3nvcring him after stepping away momentarlly. According to a redacted Incident I, port Iron file Lee Cmu,lg Sherlff'E Of- lice,tie pidep vere, gdlyd to the PArkhill lot at DlomondHead Beach Resort, 2000 Estero Blvd. When they arrived, they contacted Ole emvnrker, who said he ,,nil the Ule- Ilmwar. working on on Inground clec- tile box, The reporting mwmicur walked .Way unit round the Wilt unrespon- sive whan lie returnad, the report indicated. He noticed the victim was "not mov- I ng and become Unresponsive." accard- Ing to [he repo 1. First responders leten filed (h.vlc- lfm died shortly offer 1:30 p.m. No fw- lher hdormatlON was ov.11oble Wednesday afternoon. A receptlonisl for SkIIII (ream Hotels & Resorts, the company mon.ging the property, answarul the phone, but the company didn't return a request for comment. Team., RudrIquea Is n Breaking/blue Nevis Reporter for I,e Napfet Doily Nears and The Neas-Pmts. You can reach Tomas of THodrlguet@go,- ,lel Leom or 772-333-5501. Connect full, ,inn o I Threads @(onmspobellron, In- slagrant @Ianrntfrolicilron, F cebeelk LDl.nmS.driguenmms grid Miller OoTbamsPRoOcll.n. The public is invited to attend a ne,ghborhood information meetinger field by Rob" J. Magical. FAICP, Senior Vice President, and Jureaxe Chastain, AICP, Planer In at Hole Mantes, a Bowman Company, and Richard D. Yovan odtl, Esquke or Coleman Yovanovich &Koaeler, RA,on behalf of the appbcanl at tile following limeand location: Monday. August 14. 2023 415:30 p.m. Collier County OF/IFAS Extension, Mulll-Purpose Room 14700 Immokaleo Road, Napiaa, FL 34120 The lolbwing hm concurrent applicalions have been made to Collier County Growth Manages w I: (Anlendmeld (OMPA)Ito amend the F husband Use Element Growth and FI lure Lant Plan nd Use Map to add 14.18t acres la the it -ling Mission Subih,1 .1, far a Iola[ site .I 36x acres. The axis(ng subdatricl allows for a maxknum of 00,000 square feel of uses, includ'mo a church, chAdcare services. and a Duvaia school. The proposed OMPA tolatns the maximum 00000 salaam fool Mutation, and Itur permlled chtxch, clnldcom eorvlie, and private schoul uses. The GMPA also proposes I. odtl addhionai community $sour,.$, including a maximum oI lour food In ek., medical .thee, social serva,es, post-ecundary arMal,an• stiff essential and other community oriented services; Slid (7) Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Noplos Community Facilities Planned Unit Dovelopment (CFPUD) Amendmani (PL•202WM2100) An amendmmnt to odtl 14.18L acres to the PUD and allow additional community services within Ilse PUD. Tha approved PUD allows lot a maximum of $10.000 square feel of uses, includng a i,000-seal church, chadcae servkas with . maximum of 300 attendees, and a private School with a maxknum of 450 sludenls. Tha proposed PUD amendment falohns the maximum 90,0DO square (out hmitahml, maxnactin of I,ODD church seals, and maximum of 450 private $clad students; but reduce., the cmkk:am eri mllment from 300 to a maximum of 200 allol,dees. The PUD Amendmenl also proposes to add addilional canmumly services, Inctudag a maximum of few load tmchs, medical office, social services, post-aecoridary aducahon, and easankal and other cummunily- crianlad Service.. Th036 lends total 363 zeros and are localed in Scrlmn 19. Township 4$ South, Range 20 East, CUIRLIC0unly, Florida, on the south area of Od Well Road, approx, one -quaver Milo west of Everglades Rivd. 4 '4 $ is E G O of Mil ton sual[crJi [n,mandrl [vexl+arn lnlena <NrtA •r NMin � [INNATf.i,I,MA ns ly WI,wN,LNaIa,L,+NxlM.ent+w+lu"AwWit. leuVen N W Business and propony ovrnars, reeldamis and vuilcrs are m1ccmm to intend the pro,anlawn and doe's. Iha Propel lath the applicant sad Collier County stall. Zoom is bring paKdad as an ooil- to those unable to attend the meeting in person.However, P ladnlcat cbllicuaas also will Zoom, the 1.1, cal dnbcultles vial not be Utounds lit InvNitlalo Ihn meoun8. Il you rrauld ilia to padlSipaa eta Zoom or vie,v a video of Ill. mcellaq, pleas. email us al Na9bWrltDodMee111ng4Pludea9.4atu and we all send irwat nvla or a ink of the video. You may aho emal Any comments or questions to N.tl9binrh7911h1AEILR.dLc19BU,4PID• Pleaw Irthrence Mission Subdistrict GMPA ontl Emmanuel Lulbomn CFPUD Amendment in sub)ecl line, Hobert J Mabel.. FAICP. Saner V.- President. Hole fAonlns, a Bowman Company 950 Encom Way, Naples„ Fl. 341 H; Ph na 239.2fA•2000 O N N O O O O N O N J a O in 00 r- N r� N C Q .N d O N N O O O O N O N J a �L M 2 L) IL U Al m Packet Pg. 8 6 9.A.4.c r 3 HOLEMONTES E a Bowman company O July 28, 2023 Re: Mission Subdistrict GMPA (PL-20200002204) & Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples Community Facilities Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) Amendment (PL-20200002198) HM File No. 2006.096A Dear Property Owner: Please be advised that Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, Senior Vice President, and Jeremie Chastain, AICP, Planner III of Hole Montes, a Bowman Company, and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire of Coleman Yovanovich & Koester, P.A., on behalf of the applicant have made the following two concurrent applications to Collier County Growth Management: (1) Mission Subdistrict GMPA (PL-20200002204) A Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) to amend the Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Map to add 14.181 acres to the existing Mission Subdistrict, for a total size of 36±. The existing subdistrict allows for a maximum of 90,000 square feet of uses, including a church, childcare services, and a private school. The proposed GMPA retains the maximum 90,000 square foot limitation, and the permitted church, childcare service, and private school uses. The GMPA also proposes to add additional community services, including a maximum of four food trucks, medical office, social services, post -secondary education, and essential and other community -oriented services; and (2) Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples Community Facilities Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) Amendment (PL-20200002198) An amendment to add 14.18:4: acres to the PUD and allow additional community services within the PUD. The approved PUD allows for a maximum of 90,000 square feet of uses, including a 1,000-seat church, childcare services with a maximum of 300 attendees, and a private school with a maximum of 450 students. The proposed PUD amendment retains the maximum 90,000 square foot limitation, maximum of 1,000 church seats, and maximum of 450 private school students; but reduces the childcare enrollment from 300 to a maximum of 200 attendees. The PUD Amendment also proposes to add additional community services, including a maximum of four food trucks, medical office, social services, post -secondary education, and essential and other community -oriented services. These lands total 361 acres and are located in Section 19, Township 48 South, Range 28 East, Collier County, Florida, on the south side of Oil Well Road, approx. one -quarter mile west of Everglades Blvd. (See reverse side for location map). In compliance with the Land Development Code requirements, a Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held to provide you an opportunity to hear a presentation about this petition and ask questions. The Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held on Monday, August 14, 2023 at 5:30 p.m. at Collier County UF/IFAS Extension, 14700 Immokalee Road, Multi - Purpose Room, Naples, Florida 34120. H:12006\2006096A\WP\CFPUD\NIM #2\Property Owner Letter (7-28-2023).docx 950 Encore Way, Naples, FL 34110 P: 239.254.2000 holemontes.com I bowman.com Packet Pg. 897 9.A.4.c Zoom is being provided as an option to those unable to attend the meeting in person. However, if technical difficulties arise with Zoom, the technical difficulties will not be grounds to invalidate the meeting. If you would like to participate via Zoom or view a video of the meeting, please email us at Nei ghborhoodMeeting(a,hmeng.com and we will send zoom invite or a link of the video. You may also email any comments or questions to Nei ghborhoodMeeting(a-),hmeng.com. Please reference Emmanuel Lutheran CFPUD Amendment and Mission Subdistrict GMPA in subject line. Very truly yours, HOLE MONTES, a BOWMAN COMPANY 'Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP Senior Vice President RJM/sek Z a� Go a� Ln Y � D E tvD E LeJ Oil Well Rd SUBJECT SITE 06 Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples Y M CFPUD Amendment & H1 �!�o■ Mission Subdistrict Growth Management Plan Amendment NTES Location Map I- A2006\2006096AMPTHUMNIM N2\Property Owner Letter (7-28-2023).docx 950 Encore Way, Naples, FL 34110 P: 239.254.2000 holemontes.com I bowman.com Packet Pg. 898 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH OF NAPLES COMMUNITY FACILITIES PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (CFPUD) AMENDMENT (PL-20200002198) & MISSION SUBDISTRICT GMPA (PL-20200002204) MONDAY, AUGUST 14, 2023 AT 5:30PM PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY ***-Please be advised*** The information on this sheet is to contact you regarding this project and future public meetings. Under Florida law, e-mail addresses, phone numbers and certain home addresses are public records once received by a government agency. if you do not want your e-mail address, phone number or home address released if the County receives a public records request, you can refrain from including such information on this sheet. You have the option of checking with the County staff on your own to obtain updates on the project as well as checking the County Web site for additional information. Name Address City, State Zip E-Mail Address .21 .c< N a .N am tY 0 N N 0 0 0 0 N 0 N J a N �L C� G U d U U m t x w r c m E �a a Packet Pg. 899 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH OF NAPLES COMMUNITY FACILITIES PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (CFPUD) AMENDMENT (PL-20200002198) & MISSION SUBDISTRICT GMPA (PL-20200002204) MONDAY, AUGUST 14, 2023 AT 5:30PM PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY ***-Please be advEseoi*** The information on this sheet is to contact you regarding this project and future public meetings. Under Florida law, e-mail addresses, phone numbers and certain home addresses are public records once received by a government agency. If you do not want your e-mail address, phone number or home address released if the County receives a public records request, you can refrain from including such information on this sheet. You have the option of checking with the County staff on your own to obtain updates on the project as well as checking the County Web site for additional information. Name Address City, State Zip E-Mail Address r QU cc (f c a Packet Pg. 900 9.A.4.c 2013 FUSCO FAMILY TRUST 2052 HAMLIN STREET NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i 2540 31ST AVE NE LLC 343013TH AVE SW i NAPLES, FL 34117 --- 0 i I A J & N L RUBEN REV TRUST 1277 GRAND CANAL DR NAPLES, FL 34110 --- 0 i I I ABOVE HOMES CORPORATION 6836 IL REGALO CIR NAPLES, FL 34109 --- 0 ACOSTA, GEORGETTE DIAZ JASIEL SUAREZ 3440 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ADAMIK, PETER LUDMILA KREK 10333 HERITAGE BAY BLVD #1712 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ADIR, MARYLEXIS 3565 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 2822 AIMARO, JASON A & DANA L 3290 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1564 ALBINO TR, FRANCINE M FRANCINE M ALBINO L/R/TRUST UTD 09/15/98 9821 CONNECTICUT ST BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135 --- 0 I I I ALENS, SANDRA M 2779 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1768 I I 2115 HAMLIN LLC 2115 HAMLIN ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 2545 37TH AVE NE LAND TRUST 720 GOODLETTE RD N # 304 NAPLES, FL 34102 --- 0 ABASCAL, ARTURO A ALINA ABASCAL 408 W 16TH ST HIALEAH, FL 33010--- 2958 ABRAHAM,RUTH NOEL PATRICK NOEL MARIE ANGE SAINT CILIEN SOLAGE PATRICK SAINT CILIEN 234135TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ACOSTA, IULISSA 26 DEPAN AVE FLORAL PARK, NY 11001 --- 0 ADAMS, JIMMY & BRENDA 1228 SANE RD SE DALTON, GA 30721--- 5636 ADRIEL CORP 1895 NE 198TH TER NORTH MIAMI BEAC, FL 33179--3118 AIME, DAVILES BIEN ROSELINE PETIT FRERE 3352 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ALBRIGHT, JACOB S DONNA M HUNTLEY 2425 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7403 ALFANO, DANIEL & THERESA 726 AVENUE T BROOKLYN, NY 11223---3340 2395 HEYDON CIRCLE LAND TRUST PO BOX 501 IMMOKALEE, FL 34143 --- 0 3247 35 AVE NE LLC 8805 NW 149 TER MIAMI LAKES, FL 33018 --- 0 ABL CONTRACTOR CORP 1840 NW 16TH ST MIAMI, FL 33125 --- 0 ACOSTA, FIDEL DAVID ACOSTA, MARIA E=& FIDEL 3745 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 2826 ACOSTA,CARLOSJ JAZMIN MOLINA-ACOSTA 2565 37TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ADDERLEY, FRANKLIN C 525 NW 15TH WAY FT LAUDERDALE, FL 33311--- 8847 AGUIRRE, JESUS 706 PINE CREST LN NAPLES, FL 34104 --- 0 ALANIS, JESUS R ANNA L ALANIS 2101 FAIRMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120--0 ALDANA, JORGE Y GUTIERREZ 3042 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ALFARO, ZVLIMA JOSE H ALFARO 3240 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3203 Packet Pg. 901 9.A.4.c ALFONSO, IDALMIS ALFONSO, JOSE CARABALLO ALFONSO, LAZARO M 1925 N MONTICELLO AVE ODALYS ALFONSO PEREZ MABEL LAGO CHICAGO, IL 60647 --- 0 2407 RANDALL BLVD 2342 HEYDON CIR E I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ALMAGUER BATISTA, ALCIDES I � , ALMANZA, ALFREDO & SANJUANA j ALMODOVAR, ANTONIO 2585 29TH AVE NE i I 2181 14TH AVE NE LISA EMILYTHOMAS NAPLES, FL 34120---0 i NAPLES, FL 34120--- 5451 I I 3225 29TH AVE NE j , I I � NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ALONSO, GUILLERMO ALONSO, JOSEPH & MICHELLE , ALONSO, LUISJ 3210 EVERGLADES BLVD N 2645 37TH AVE NE I 3740 NW 13TH ST NAPLES, FL 34120--- 2823 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7492 i , i MIAMI, FL 33126--- 2623 ALONSO, RODNEY ALSLIMAN, MOHAMMAD ' ALTMAN, ROBERT A & MELINDA L JUANA RAQUEL GUTIERREZ BARRERA I I 1N249 BLOOMINGDALE RD 2420 39TH AVE NE 2644 37TH AVE NE CAROL STREAM, IL 60188--- 2817 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7402 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ALTUHOV, BENJAMIN & MARIA ALUSMA, CLAUDETTE & WILSON I l ALVARADO JR, ALPHONSO 2970 RANDALL BLVD 2018 FAIRMONT LN 278124TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120---0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ALVARADO, ANA ALVAREZ, ANAIS ALVAREZ, ANDREA DANIEL CERRADA ALEX PINTO 2775 29TH AVE NE 3385 35TH AVE NE KEVIN ALEXIS PINTO NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7413 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 3671 33RD AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ALVAREZ, ANDY ALVAREZ, COSME D & MARIA I ALVAREZ, IDAEL VANESSA DIAZ I 2840 29TH AVE NE 3640 24TH AVE SE 3245 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7414 NAPLES, FL 34117 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120---0 I ALVAREZ, JOSE PEREZ ALVAREZ, JUAN ALBERTO ALVAREZ, JUAN ALBERTO ISABEL HERNANDEZ JUAN CARLOS ALVAREZ I JUAN CARLOS ALVAREZ 2821 37TH AVE NE 1555 W 44TH PL #343 I 1555 W 44TH PL #343 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i HIALEAH, FL 33012 --- 0 HIALEAH, FL 33012 --- 0 j ALVAREZ, MARIAG MORENO ALVAREZ, OSCAR i AMAYAJR, RAFAELA JAIME LOPEZ LEON 2840 29TH AVE NE 1827 SW 21ST STREET #1 i 2488 37TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 i FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33315 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 AMAYA, ERNESTO RODRIGUEZ AMAYA, SANTOS V AMERINE, BRITTANY 2340 27TH AVE NE ! 2665 35TH AVE NE I i DWAYNE WIERCINSKI I NAPLES, FL 34120---0 I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1406 I 1928 WELLINGTON ST I i I I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 Packet Pg. 902 9.A.4.c AMEY, JENNIFER AMEY, SCOTT ALAN I AMMERMAN, RACHEL 3440 29TH AVE NE MARIE MONDE AMEY ! 2725 41ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1586 2473 HEYDON CIR E ! i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I ANDERSON, MELISSA L & GARYJ � ANDERSON, ROBERTA I ANDERSON,TAMI MARIE 2246 VERMONT LN NANCY JANE ANDERSON I 2027 PARSON STREET NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I 2780 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I I NAPLES, FL 34120---7412 II ANDRACA, WILLIAM &YENEY ANDRE, VALANCIA I ANEETASHAILESH LIVING TRUST I 3944 EVERGLADES BLVD N I 2118 CLEMENTINE STREET 3029 NEWPORT DR NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I SPRINGFIELD, IL 62702 --- 0 ANNA M SAMMS REVOCABLE TRUST ANNONI, CATHERINE ( ARANGUREN, JUAN C HERNANDEZ 2114 SATSUMA LANE BARKLEY, ROBERTA ` CRISTINA ZAMORA NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 17476 BRILL DR 3370 31ST AVE NE I CLINTONTWP, MI 48035--- 2313 i NAPLES, FL 34120--- 2930 ARCISZEWSKI, SCOTT ARENA, MICHAEL R ARGUEDAS, CLAUDIO R ORMENO 299135TH AVE NE 176 ILYSSA WAY 3245 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 STATEN ISLAND, NY 10312 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ARGUELLES, LEYDIER ARGUETA, FEDERICO & ROSE M ARGUETA, SIRIS XIOMARA 2027 SAGEBRUSH CIR 2620 39TH AVE NE 2197 CLEMENTINE ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ARIAS DEOLIVARES, EVANGELINA I� ARIAS, DAX OMAR PECHO I `' ARIAS, DAX OMAR PECHO 2430 35TH AVE NE 5290 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 5290 GOLDEN GATE PKWY NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1403 NAPLES, FL 34116 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34116 --- 0 ARIZMENDI, MICHAEL & LYNDSEY ARPAIA, BRIAN R ( ARREDONDO, R CARLOS GARCIA 2442 RANDALL BLVD I TAYLOR JAE LANNING I 3470 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3572 I 2391 HEYDON CIR E NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ARREGUIN, ANTONIO ARREGUIN, MIGUEL ARREGUIN, RICARDO 2925 37TH AVE NE KAREN VIRVIESCAS RUIZ 2541 24TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 2130 CLEMENTINE ST NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3555 ! I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i ARRIETA, FRANCISCO ALVARADO I i i ASTHAPPAN, JOSEPH P I I AURIA INC ANAACUNA AMMINIKUTTYJOSEPH 5091GENOVAST I 90 25TH AVE NW 1 JIBEY ASTHAPPAN i AVE MARIA, FL 34142 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34102---6010 2224 DANCY ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 Packet Pg. 903 9.A.4.c AURORA 14 LLC AURORA14 LLC AUST, WILLIAM 2155 KHASIA POINT 2155 KHASIA PT CAROL J GIORGI NAPLES, FL 34119---0 NAPLES, FL 34110 --- 0 5863 PRIVATE RD PO BOX 242 LAHASKA, PA 18931 --- 0 AVDYLLARI, BARDHYL i AVI LA, GILBERTO TORO AVILES GARAY, FELIX A 2571 GOLDEN GATE BLVD E I DAYRIS SOCARRAS I j 2080 FAIRMONT LN j NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 j 3315 31ST AVE NE ! NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4573 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 2931 j i AVILES, FLOR A MORALES I AVILES, JUAN R & ANA L i , AVILEZ, ALLAN & MELISSA DIOGENES ARRIETA !f 1232 CYPRESS WOODS DR I 3270 29TH AVE NE 3335 RANDALL BLVD I NAPLES, FL 34103 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i AVRAMIS, ANA MARIE AYALA, PEDRO & ALMADELIA AYBAR, NELSON A & SANDY E ` JESSICA M HEMENWAY 3361 RANDALL BLVD 2088 FAIRMONT LN 8766 CAVANO ST E NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 AZUA, ROGELIO & MAGDA ELENA BAADER, FRANK BABINEAU, MARK STEVEN & TRACY 2725 31ST AVE NE 3256 33RD AVE NE 2385 37TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120---1560 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7541 (" BALASA, ALEXANDRU BALDWIN, MATTHEW JAMES BALLARD, DOUGLAS R &THERESA M OLGA I BALASA DIANE CAROL BALDWIN 2266 HEYDON CIR W 3570 27TH AVE NE 2892 ARMSTRONG DR NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4584 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 LAKE ORION, MI 48360 --- 0 f BALMACEDA, MARIA BALON, DANIEL RODRIGUEZ ( BANOS, YORKY LINARES 550 SW 115TH AVE UNIT 904E MARILYN CRUZ VALIDO IRAIMY GARCIA BORROTO MIAMI, FL 33174 --- 0 2482 EVERGLADES BLVD N 371135TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BANUELOS, LEOBARDO ( BAPPERT, JOHN W & BREANNE H BARACK, GEORGE 1 2497 29TH AVE NE 2166 CLEMENTINE ST ( JANICE NIXON I NAPLES, FL 34120---7553 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 KAREN M LAPOINT 4515 BRUENING DR I iPARMA, OH 44134 --- 0 BARATTA, GEORGE & LAURA BARBA, YOELZEQUEIRA BARBARA FJONESTRUST 1890 ALAMEDA DR I 3965 EVERGLADES BLVD N 3000 COUNTY BARN RD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120---0 NAPLES, FL 34112 5438 I BARBARA, ACDEL I I II. BARBOSA, AMELIDA & EDMUNDO I BARKES, DEBRA A 2625 39TH AVE NE I 891 21ST ST SW JAMES M CARTER NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34117--- 4163 5690 TAYLOR RD i HARTSVILLE, IN 47224 --- 0 Packet Pg. 904 9.A.4.c BARLATIER, ALOURDES EVANSTE PIERRE 2584 41ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BARRON, THOMAS A & ROANNE 285 TADS TRAIL OLDSMAR, FL 34677 --- 0 BARTE, MELA MARK EDWARD BLAKEMORE 2226 VERMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BASTIDAS, FERNANDO TATIANA ZAYAS 2087 VERMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BATISTA, RAMON ALINA CASTELLANOS 3470 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BAZAN, ISRAEL ZAYAS FRANKLIN 0 DIAZ 2515 37TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BEAUDOIN, ALEXANDRA NICHOLAS METAYER 89 GOVE ST MANCHESTER, NH 03102 --- 0 BEDOYA, MAURICIO A JULIANA A OROZCO 2460 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BELCHER, WILLIAM VICTORIA GILLUM 2450 HEYDON CIR E NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BELVILLE, TRISHA BETH 2280 DANCY ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BARRERA, LAURA SAYONARA GUSTAVO HUMBERTO PERILLA 2696 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BARROSO,BARBARO G ANA MARIA LIRIANO 3935 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120--- 2928 BARTON, D R PO BOX 105 EVERGLADES CITY, FL 34139 --- 105 BATISTA JR, PAULO J & NANCY S 101 FAWN LAKE DR DINGMANS FERRY, PA 18328--- 4136 BAUTISTA, AMANDA 1948 WELLINGTON STREET NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BEAMAN, MARK D MARY ELLEN MILLS 2065 MANDARIN LN NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4555 BEAUMONT, PAUL G & CLEOFINA M 296124TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3545 BEDOYA-PENA, LUIS FERNANDO 1846 ALAMEDA DR NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BELL, MITCHELL N 803 E 15T AVE NEW SMYRNA BEACH, FL 32169 --- 0 BENAVIDES, FERNANDO RENATA DOROTA BENAVIDES 2264 DANCY ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BARRERA, OSCAR DEJESUS BELLO TANIA ROLDAN SANTIESTEBAN 2675 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BARSOUM FAMILY LIVING TRUST 2250 VERMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BASSANO, JOHN & JOSEPHINE 2120 PARSON ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BATISTA, PETER & MIREYA 20504 SW 127TH PL MIAMI, FL 33177--- 5104 BAUTISTA, VERONICA RAMIREZ 286S 37TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7433 BEATTY, THOMAS JAMES SHANNON MARIE BEATTY 2435 37TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BEDARD, DWINELL & ALISSA 3170 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 446 BELANGER, KENNETH RICHARD LYNN ANN BELANGER 1908 WELLINGTON ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BELOSHKURENKO, NAUM & INNA 2219 DANCY ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BENIMADHO, ARMAND PHARMASING 11221 NW 46TH LN DORAL, FL 33178--- 4349 Packet Pg. 9 57 9.A.4.c BENITEZ, CARLOS IVAN COLLAZO BERENS, ROSS ALAN KARLA ROSUAN GOMEZ MALDONADO 2382 ORCHARD ST 2407 HEYDON CIR E NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BERMAN, MATTHEW D & CARRIE L I . BERMUDEZ, MARISA C 5355 CORAL WOOD DR 1 BERMUDEZ HELEN A=& SERGIO NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 i 2460 29TH AVE NE I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7540 i , BERRY, CHRISTOPHER W BERTEMATTI, ANDRES A & MARKIA j KONRD M BERRY 9721 SW 32ND ST I 4327 SW 125TH LN 4327 MIAMI, FL 33165--- 3027 MIRAMAR, FL 33027---6013 BETANCOURT, JAVIER ANDRES } BEVARS, JANICE R 27816TH AVE SE I GARY ATKINSON NAPLES, FL 34117 -0 2725 37TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---7458 I BIDAJOSEPH, ELMO BIEGEL,JACQUELINE 2017 FAIRMONT LN 681 CAMBRIDGE RD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 PARAMUS, NJ 07652--- 4223 BILARDELLO, DANN J l BIRD, GREGORY M & COLEEN M 2590 EVERGLADES BLVD N I 2313 TANGERINE LN NAPLES, FL 34120--- 5560 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BLACKFORD, BURCHELL & KERRYANN ' I I BLACKFORD, ORAL & NADIEN 1956 PARSON STREET I 2040 HAMLIN ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i BLANCHETTE, MICHAEL & SHARON j BLANCO, MILAGROS l 2057 FAIRMONT LN l I 1987 FAIRMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I ' NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I I I BLANKENSHIP, CHAD MYCHAEL BLOCKER EST, BRUCE LAUREN WILSON BLANKENSHIP I % DEAN M BLOCKER PR 2259 DANCY ST I 1303 NEW MARKET RD W NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 V IMMOKALEE, FL 34142--- 2253 l BLOOM, JAMES S I BLUME, STEPHEN L 6072 POLLY AVE i 2820 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I I , BERGER, DANNY & ALEXANDRA 2051 SAGEBRUSH CIR NAPLES, FL 34120---0 BERMUDEZ, VICTOR R &JESSICA 2785 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BESSE, RICHARD L & BRIDGET 144 ROYAL PALM DR STE 218 MARCO ISLAND, FL 34145--- 2010 BICKEL, PHILLIP SHIRLEY MARIE BICKEL 2445 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7403 BIER, RIVKA JOSEPH VAN METER 2111 HAMLIN ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BLACKBURN, DONNA L 3730 33RD AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 466 BLACKWOOD, MAUVA ELAINE NEREKAJ GORDON 2243 VERMONT LANE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BLANDON, BENITO 2041 FAIRMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4574 BLONDO, ALFREDO MIRELLA SERINO 3430 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BOBAK, MICHAEL FLEET LINDSEY MICHELLE BOBAK 1983 FAIRMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 Packet Pg. 906 9.A.4.c BOBAY, JEFFREY D & STEPHANIE M BOBOESCU, ION & LAVINIA C BOCK, CHRISTOPHER & ELIZABETH 2076 SAGEBRUSH CIR 2279 HEYDON CIR W 2620 41ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4568 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4585 I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 2802 BOERO, LEYSITH i i BOHM, SCOTT BOLLTTR, ROBERTO 349131ST AVE NE i SHELLY MUSIEL % ORANGETREE ASSOCIATES NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 2370 HEYDON CIRCLE E I PO BOX 855 i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ` I BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34133 --- 0 BONACCI, ANTHONY & ELLEN 1 I BONIN, CHRISTINA L BORCHERS, JOHN & JACQUELINE 2223 VERMONT LN ` 67 MOUNTAIN HILL ROAD 3635 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I GROVESNORDALE, CT 06255---0 I I i NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1512 BORGES, MANFRED & DONNA J BOTERO, JUAN BOWEN, CLIFTON ONEIL 9641 CAMPBELL CIR LINA ALMANSA NEREKA JADE GORDON NAPLES, FL 34109--- 4506 4032 WATERVIEW LOOP 2145 CLEMENTINE ST i WINTER PARK, FL 32792---0 l NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BOWERS, JOY LYNN � i BOWMAN, CHRISTOPHER D BOYD, BECKY J 2322 HEYDON CIR W MICHEALE BOWMAN 2113 CLEMENTINE STREET NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4586 2091 SAGEBRUSH CIR NAPLES, FL 34120--0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4569 BRAKE, PETER DAVID ( BRANCATO, VINCENT i BRASSE FAMILY LIVING TRUST COURTNEY ELIZABETH BRAKE I 2075 PARSON STREET 2310 TANGERINE LN 2213 CARA CARA WAY NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120---0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I BRAVO, CARLOS R & ROSE M BRETOS, TOMAS D & EULALIA C 3326 FLAGLER AVE 1220 SW 143RD AVE KEY WEST, FL 33040---0 I MIAMI, FL 33184--- 3204 ( BRIMMER, LOGAN JON EATON �' BRISC, IOAN & CORNELIA NICOLE BRIMMER I 912 N GIBERT CT 3385 RANDALL BLVD RIDGEFIELD, WA 98642 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BROWN, AUDREY BROWN, FRANCINE j 4010 EVERGLADES BLVD N I 2284 DANCY ST NAPLES, FL 34120---2901 I I II! NAPLES, FL 34120---0 I BROWN, ROBERT L & DORIS J BRUCKER LIVING TRUST 2037 MANDARIN LANE ! 1980 PARSON ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 it BRIDGES, BENJAMIN PAUL ANNIE HOBGOOD BRIDGES 2470 HEYDON CIR E NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 �I. BROMLEY, WILLIAM EARLE I I 2110 CLEMENTINE STREET NAPLES, FL 34120---0 i BROWN, ROBERT ANDREW j 419 WESTSIDE BLVD CATONSVILLE, MD 21228--- 4062 BRUNA, JUAN M & BLANCA JUAN C BRUNA i ANGELA M BRUNA i 860 E 38TH ST HIALEAH,FL 33013--- 2827 Packet Pg. 907 9.A.4.c BRYAN W PAUL FAMILY LTD PTNSHP BRYANT, BENJAMIN ISAIAH PO BOX 2357 BARINA MARQUET BRYANT LABELLE, FL 33975 --- 0 2835 35TH AVE NE i NAPLES, FL 34120---0 BUCCI, JOSEPH H & LOUANN BUCHMAN, JEREMY 2477 ALYDAR DR i ! CHANTEL BUCHMAN WEXFORD, PA 15090 --- 0 I f 2107 SAGEBRUSH CIR it I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 li BUILES, ANDRES & STEPHANIE I BUONANTUONO, DOMINICK C 1955 FAIRMONT LN ( ELLEN M BUONANTUONO NAPLES, FL 34120---0 I I 2290 HEYDON CIR W I NAPLES, FL 34120---0 l BURKETT, ROMONA & TIMOTHY I BURTON, RAE ANN 2071 SAGEBRUSH CIR I 2530 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---4569 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 435 BUTERA, ANTHONY & MARY P I BUTLER, NANCY LYN 4594 HIDDEN HOLLOW ROAD STEPHEN LEROY BUTLER HAMBURG, NY 14075 --- 0 2092 PARSON ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 CABRERA, ANA D CACHARES, LINNETTE 79 SUMMER ST 2061 HAMLIN ST SALEM, MA 01970--- 3044 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i CADAVID,ALEJANDRO CAFFREY SR, LEWIS J & MARLENE JASON JIMENEZ 2298 HEYDON CIR W 5201 RISING COMET LANE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4584 LAKE WORTH, FL 33463 --- 0 I CALCIANO, MICHAEL D CALDERON, JOSE L DANIELA S CALCIANO I MARIA X ROMERO 3685 31ST AVE NE 2068 SAGEBRUSH CIR NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I CALIGUIRE, THOMAS JOHN i CALLUE, WINSTON R TONI MARIE ADLRIDGE I 5555 MORNING CREEK CIR 2295 DANCY ST I ATLANTA, GA 30349 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 CALZADILLA, A LEONEL CARRILLO CAMACHO, ERICK YAMILEIDIS GARCIA LIRIANO i YAIMA FINOL 3480 35TH AVE NE i ' 3345 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i I � NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1587 BT INVESTMENTS 01 LLC 2400 OIL WELL RD S NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i C s BUENTELLO, DANIELSIMON i ISABELLE BUENTELLO s I 2117 CLEMENTINE STREET NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 s BURKETT, GRACIELA GRIMALDA JAMES WENDELL BURKETTJR 2461 HEYDON CIR E _ NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 { u BUSSARD, DANIEL A & AMANDA D p 2995 31ST AVE NE ` e NAPLES, FL 3412D --- 0 � c c c C C C CABALLERO, CYNTHIA C c 1511 N 70TH WAY c HOLLYWOOD, FL 33024 --- 0 "p c u a r c CACHO, DANILO C 2485 OIL WELL RD NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1472 = 1 c I` p 1 I / CAIN, MICHELLE LYNN `c KENNETH FORREST 3630 29TH AVE NE C NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 C c c c i G r CALDWELL, JEREMIAH I I 2438 HEYDON CIRCLE E < I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 � C lI p CALVO, JORGE A JEANNETTE CALVO 4703 S LISBON CT AURORA, CO 80015 --- 0 .I i CAMACHO, VICENTE 220 1ST ST NW i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 Packet Pg. 908 9.A.4.c CAMARGO, IDANIA CABRERA CAMILLE, JEAN DIEUMES CANCINO, MAYKOL IBRAIN LOPEZ ISRAEL RODRIGUEZ DELGADO NATACHA CAMILLE CARIUS I ANA M CANCINO SANCHEZ 2646 39TH AVE NE 2545 RANDALL BLVD 3330 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I f NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I � I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 5548 I CANE, SEBASTIAN D CANEL, JACKENSON PIERRE CAPOBIANCO,JOHN VINCENT 2817 31ST AVE NE I i FRADNA SEPPE I JENNIFER LYNN CAPOBIANCO NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4541 I I 2941 EVERGLADES BLVD N 2100 PARSON ST I I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I CARABALLO, SIOMALY OTERO I CARBALLO JR, ORLANDO & YENEISY CARBALLO, ORLANDO JAIME R SOTO GONZALEZ I 2625 RANDALL BLVD I 2635 RANDALL BLVD 2219 VERMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120--- 5566 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 5566 NAPLES, FL 34120---0 CARBALLO, ORLANDO & GLADYS CARCAMO, SERGIO & FRANCIS A CARDENAS, ARTURO & WHITNEY 2635 RANDALL BLVD ( 2620 29TH AVE NE 2248 DANCY ST NAPLES, FL 34120--- 5566 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7408 "I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 J. CARDENAS, JESUS A CARDENTEY, ALEXIS VI ERA CARDONA, ELIZABETH 3165 27TH AVE NE 3740 68TH AVE NE JUAN ARANGO CHALARCA NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1523 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 320 NUTLEY ST SW VIENNA, VA 22180 --- 0 CARD05A, MARCIO A l CARDOZO, ROBERTO C OLARTE CARLYLE, KEVIN MARICELA CARDOSO I MILAGROS MOSQUERA DE OLARTE TRICIAYOUMANS 2541 PICKARD LN 2189 CLEMENTINE ST 4566 N LAKE DR NORTH PORT, FL 34286 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 SARASOTA, FL 34232 --- 0 CAROLYN G PHIPPS TRUST CARRASCO, DAYSI CARRAZANA, HUGO RAMON 2106 SATSUMA LN VICTOR RENE BARRAGAN PEREZ RAQUEL CASTEDO ORTIZ NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4558 1935 WELLINGTON ST 2003 SAGEBRUSH CIR NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 CARRERA, JANIRE CARRILLO, CONSTAIN ( CARRILLO, HECTOR L GUADARRAMA 2016 SAGEBRUSH CIR ( 8104 SW 136TH PL I I ELVIRA MARTINEZ NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4568 MIAMI, FL 33183---4187 2214 CARA CARA WAY NAPLES, FL 34120---0 CARRILLO, MICHELLE CARRINGER, JENNIFER N & MARK A CARTAYA, RAFAEL I 2561 27TH AVE NE 2153 FAIRMONT LN I ( 4280 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4576 I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 �I CARTER, BRANDON W & RACHEL B i I� CARTER, KENNETH BRIAN CARVAJALJR, JORGE A 2072 SAGEBRUSH CIR I TRACEY JEAN CARTER LOURDES CARVAJAL NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 2405 31ST AVE NE ! 2765 37TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7458 Packet Pg. 909 9.A.4.c CARVER DALE S CASASIERRA REALTY LLC CASEY, JOHN R & MARIA 15679 S BLACKFOOT ST 5800 PINE TREE RD 3280 EVERGLADES BLVD N s OLATHE, KS 66062--- 3672 I PARKLAND, FL 33067 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 , c s s CASTANO, ELIZABETH R CASTELJR, CLARENCE R _ CASTELLANO, YOANDY VAZQUEZ 3680 33RD AVE NE i KELLY A CASTEL ! ROSA SANCHEZ GARCIA s NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1588 31 OLD SCHOOLHOUSE RD i 2385 27TH AVE NE s NEW CITY, NY 10956---0 j NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ; I s I t _ CASTELLON, TERESA L l i CASTILLO, GABRIEL & MARIA I CASTILLO, LOSE M & ANGELICA YOLANDA BARRIOS i ( 5406 TRAMMEL ST t 3510 29TH AVE NE 431E CICADO WAY I NAPLES, FL 34113--- 7863 I NAPLES, FL 34120-- 0 i LAS VEGAS, NV 89121---0 u i J I i i CASTILLO, TARA LYNN & OMAR M I CASTINEIRA, MANUEL CASTRO REVOCABLE TRUST 1960 PARSON STREET 2785 27TH AVE NE 5861 WAXMYRTLE WAY NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34109 --- 0 c c c c c CASTRO, GEORGE V CASTRO, RENE & ZENEYDA CEDENO, GUILLERMO HERNANDEZ C c 7211 MIRAMAR PKWY 1481 16TH ST NE IVETTE CALDERIN MIRAMAR, FL 33023- 5932 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 °�' '" 4040 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 CEKO, LOUIE &TANYA CELIS, KAYLA & DAVID ` CEPEDA, ALI R VALBUENA i 2840 EVERGLADES BLVD N 2039 SAGEBRUSH CIR DANYELA C SILVA s NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 284137TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 o I J t CERRA, MARIA TERESA / `• CERVANTES, YAUMEL CESAR, MARIE L o N JUAN A LOPEZ GLORYSELL FIORES 242131ST AVE NE No 2644 27TH AVE NE 3234 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 C 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120---0 G N C4 1 N l a j CEVALLOS, FRANCISCO FABIAN CHACON, ENNOVY T MELGAREJO j CHAGNON REVOCABLE TRUST N ANYELITDADNEY RIANO RODRIIGUEZ RAM A LOPEZ VELAZQUEZ l 3575 27TH AVE NE 1988 PARSON STREET I 2477 HEYDON CIRCLE E NAPLES, FL 34120---1557 4) NAPLES, FL 34120---0 I I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 V IL CHAMBERLAND, ROLAND 1 ( CHANG, FREDERICK CHARLES MARIE L 2665 29TH AVE NE I 2309 FEATHER BROOK LN I LEONCE SYLVESTRE m f NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7409 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 5419 11TH PLSW I NAPLES, FL 34116---0 s I I W CHARLES, CEDERNE I CHARLES, EMMANUELLA GUERRIER I i CHARLES, GUERDA C = d i MISLAINE GASPARD i 3264 33RD AVE NE I 3210 BERMUDA ISLE CIR #1218 5419 19TH PLSW i NAPLES, FL 34120---0 NAPLES, FL 34109 --- 0 i I NAPLES, FL 34116 --- 0 Packet Pg. 910 9.A.4.c CHARWAY, GEORGE CHASTAIN, RODNEY G I CHAVARRIA, LUIS J & MAGALY T 2141 FAIRMONT LN 3240 33RD AVE NE 2549 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1560 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 5577 CHAVEZ, DEYSI CHAVEZ, LAZARA CHEN - OIAN TRUST GABRIEL CHAVEZ I j ELIODORO CHAVEZ 3841 W 144TH ST 2932 29TH AVE NE i 2460 27TH AVE NE LEAWOOD, KS 66224 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 CHEN, WEI } CHERNIAVSKI, ELENA CHERUBIN, BEAUCHAMP 2360 39TH AVE NE 6052 NICHOLAS DR i ALTAGRACE CHERUBIN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I WEST BLOOMFIELD, MI 48322 --- 0 I 3875 EVERGLADES BLVD N i I NAPLES, FL 34120---0 CHICO, JIMMEY CHO, EDWIN CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF 2070 MINNEOLA ST I 741 W 17TH ST LATTER-DAY SAINTS NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 HIALEAH, FL 33010--- 2416 50 EAST NORTH TEMPLE 22ND FLR SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101---0 CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF ) CIFMORE, LEE CIOFFI, SALVATORE & LUSIA LATTER -DAY -SAINTS 272124TH AVE NE 1664 65TH ST 50 E NORTH TEMPLE ST NAPLES, FL 34120---0 BROOKLYN, NY 11204 --- 0 22ND FLOOR SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84150 --- 1 ` CIRIGLIANO LIVING TRUST A CIRKSENA, JULIE ANN ( CLARK, COURTNEY F 2182 CLEMENTINE ST I I JENNIFER LEIGH ARON ( LISSETTE GARCIA NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 JAMES RICHARD NELSON i 3275 RANDALL BLVD 16330 BOSTON PKWY NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 CLINE, IA 50325--- 4656 1 CLAUDIO, LAURA C CLEMENT, JOHN S ' CLEMMONS, JAKE & STACY 1999 FAIRMONT LN I SHEELU ALEX 1987 PARSON ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 2048 HAMLIN ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120---0 CLERMONT, JAMES CLINE, AARON & STACEY CLIS HOLDING GROUP LLC STEPHANIE DUMEL 2446 HEYDON CIR E ANGEL CABRERA 5350 TRAMMEL ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 4870 GOLDEN GATE PKWY NAPLES, FL 34113 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34116 --- 0 COHEN, ORLANDO I COHEN, PATRICIA A COLDIRON, CHRISTOPHER W DIANA FIGUEROA VEGA JAMES C COHEN MONICA COLDIRON i DAVID SALOMON COHEN j 2650 RANDALL BLVD 2206 CLEMENTINE ST 3645 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3695 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120---0 I I COLINDRES, EDGAR AUGUSTO i COLLIER CNTY I COLLIER CNTY 101 MARIA GRACE LYNCH GARMENDEZ I 3335 TAMIAMI TRAIL E STE 101 3335 TAMIAMI TRAIL E STE 5721 A CENTER LN #203 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 FALLS CHURCH, VA 22042 --- 0 Packet Pg. 911 9.A.4.c COLLIER CNTY 3335 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST NAPLES, FL 34112---0 i COLLIER CNTY 3335 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 I COLLIER CNTY 3335 TAMIAMI TRL E NAPLES, FL 34112---0 COLLIER CNTY 3335 TAMIAMIA TRL E STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 j COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY 3335 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY 3335 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY 3335 TAMIAMI TRL E STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY 3335 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY 3335 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST NAPLES, FL 34112---0 COLLIER CNTY 3335 TAMIAMI TRL E STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 Packet Pg. 912 9.A.4.c COLLIER CNTY COLLIER CNTY COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT I C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT I C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 I 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 I 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY COLLIER CNTY COLLIER CNTY i C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT I C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 I I 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 II 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 i1 j { NAPLES, FL 34112---0 COLLIER CNTY j COLLIER CNTY I COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT I I C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 i I NAPLES, FL 34111- 0 COLLIER CNTY COLLIER CNTY COLLIER CNTY j C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT I C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34112---0 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 i COLLIER CNTY I _ COLLIER CNTY COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT • ' C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 COLLIER CNTY l (Y COLLIER CNTY COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT I C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY l COLLIER CNTY COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT I C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 i NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 I I NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY COLLIER CNTY COLLIER CNTY I C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 �335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 COLLIER CNTY I COLLIER CNTY COLLIER CNTY COLLIER CNTY WATER/SEWER DIST TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY 3301 TAMIAMI TRL E 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S NAPLES, FL 34112--- 4961 I NAPLES, FL 34104 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34104 --- 0 I i I COLLIER CNTY li COLLIER CNTY 1� COLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY i TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S i 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S NAPLES, FL 34104 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34104 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34104 0 Packet Pg. 913 9.A.4.c COLLIER CNTY COLLIER CNTY COLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF -WAY 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVES 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S NAPLES, FL 34104 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34104---0 NAPLES, FL 34104 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY COLLIER COUNTY I COLLIER COUNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY 3335 TAMIAMI TRAIL E I C/O OFFICE OF COUNTY ATTORNEY 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S ( NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 j 3299 TAMIAMI TRAIL E #800 NAPLES, FL 34104 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER COUNTY COLLIER SOIL AND WATER COLLIER SOILAND WATER C/O OFFICE OF COUNTY ATTORNEY CONSERVATION DISTRICT CONSERVATION DISTRICT 3299 TAMIAMI TRAIL E #800 I 14700 IMMOKALEE RD I i 14700 IMMOKALEE RD NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120---1468 NAPLES, FL 34120 1468 COLLINS EST, DOROTHY M COLLINS, HOMER M I COLOME, ENELIDO A C/O P L COLLINS JENSEN PR ( % DAVE COLLINS i INGRID COLOME 1322 JOHNS BLVD 12749 S HAGAN CT ` I 1875 SW 22ND TER RAYMORE MO 64083 --- 0 OLATHE, KS 66062---0 I i MIAMI, FL 33145--- 3821 COMERIATO, ROBERT J & OLIVIA M I CONGME JR, VITO J & TRUDY L CONGINE JR, VITO J & TRUDY L 1971 FAIRMONT LN 2894 31ST AVE NE 2894 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4476 NAPLES, FL 34120---4476 CONIGLIARO, GIOVANNI t CONNERS, MICHAEL MATTHEW _ CONTRERAS, SERGIO 14629 BEAUFORT CIR KATHLEEN ANNE CONNERS JEANETTA G CONTRERAS NAPLES, FL 34119--- 4829 2110 HAMLIN ST 2833 37TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7433 COPPLA JR, HAROLD T & PAT CORADO, BYRON RICARDO MUNOZ , CORDOVES, ERIC 2054 MANDARIN LN MAYTE CRYSTAL MUNOZ ELIZA HERNANDEZ NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4554 2475 41ST AVE NE 2008 SAGEBRUSH CIR NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 CORNEJO, JOHANNA CAROLINA CORONA, JOSE R CORRALES, WILSON FREDY JESUS E ZAPATA 2715 41ST AVE NE ; GLORIA IRENE CORRALES 2882 41ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 2801 2274 HEYDON CIR W NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i CORREA, YENNY V I CORTEZ, HUGO ANTONIO I I COSIMANO, JOSEPH & LAUREN MIGUEL MONTES DELGADO GLADYS LETTY VERANO I 3662 29TH AVE NE 2680 37TH AVE NE 2177 CLEMENTINE ST i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120---0 I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 COSTA, JACINTO & ELISA COUNTRY HOME LLC COVENTRY, JAMES E 1991 FAIRMONT LN PO BOX 2407 i CHRISTINE L COVENTRY NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MARCO ISLAND, FL 34145 --- 0 1967 FAIRMONT LN l NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 j t Packet Pg. 914 9.A.4.c t COX II, THOMAS CHARLES CRAIG, JANIQUE CRATO, JOSEPH S AMY JO COX 5259 HIGH COURT i 1 2013 FAIRMONT LN 2152 FAIRMONT LN PLUMSTEADVILLE, PA 18947 --- 0 i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120---4575 I j � 1 CRESPO, YADIEL SUAREZ I CRISCIONE, JOHN & LINDA I I CROUSHORE, TERRY & DIONAIKA 247127TH AVE NE i 2034 MANDARIN LN I 3230 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 I I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4554 I NAPLES, FL 34120---0 CROUSHORE, TERRY A CROUSHORE, TERRY A I CROWLEY, MICHAEL & DANIELLE DIONAIKA CROUSHORE DIONAIKA M CROUSHORE 239135TH AVE NE 3230 27TH AVE NE 3230 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1564 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 1 I CRUTCHFIELD, JEANNIE MARIE CRUZ, ALFREDO MARTINEZ CRUZ, DANIEL MICHAEL DEWAYNE CRUTCHFIELD CRISTHEL DE LA FUENTE RIVERA JAQUELINE I HERNANDEZ ROBLERO j 2604 41ST AVE NE 2885 41ST AVE NE 3625 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 CRUZ, HECTOR I & IDALMIS CRUZ, JUAN CRUZ, LUIS J 2565 35TH AVE NE 560 E 58TH ST MARIA PEREIRA NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1404 HIALEAH, FL 33013--- 1315 1UNNIO FREIXA 6090 W 15TH CT HIALEAH, FL 33012--- 6202 i I CRUZ, SAUL CUBAS, LUIS GUILLERMO ( CUEVAS, JACOB & LAURA ALICIA MARLENE PONCE YOLANDA CORTIJO CUBAS 1989 SAGEBRUSH CIR 2049 MANDARIN LN 17011 N BAY RD APT 801 I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4567 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4555 SUNNY ISLES BEAC, FL 33160--- 3633 I CUEVAS, LILLIAN CULROSS, NATHAN CUMANA, DANIEL & MARTA 2740 31ST AVE NE KRISTEN KERVIN 9079 NW 121ST ST NAPLES, FL 34120---4542 2044 HAMLIN ST HIALEAH GARDENS, FL 33018 -4172 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 CUMBERLAND PROPERTIES 1 LLC CUNNINGHAM, BEVERLEY I CURBELO, JORGE L FLORES I 4532 TAMIAMI TRAIL E #i202 CARENE N CUNNINGHAM � ANISLEIDY GUERRA VALDES I NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 DONNA GINTER 2980 35TH AVE NE 2760 31ST AVE NE I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4542 ( I I CUSTODIO, CHRISTIANNE KATE f I CZYSZ FAMILY TRUST I I ( D GREENFIELD TRUST LEA CUSTODIO 2050 MANDARIN LN 3460 27TH AVE NE 2083 SAGEBRUSH CIR NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4554 I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1509 NAPLES, FL 34120---4569 I I I I DABANK, ROB I DALBY FAMILY TRUST I DALBY FAMILY TRUST 2225 CARA CARA WAY i I 9319 FIELDSTONE LN i 9319 FIELDSTONE LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ; NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i Packet Pg. 915 9.A.4.c DALUSMA, DIEUJUSTE JONITE AVRIL 2145 FAIRMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4576 DARWIN, MATTHEW JOHN & SUSAN 2113 SATSUMA LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 DAVIDSON, DONALD 2199 VERMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 DAYTON, LYNN E 2525 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1404 DE RENDON, PATRICIA G PRIMO 3027 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 DE SOUSA, QUINTINO C 2605 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1484 DEJESUS, SATURNINO BRETTE N DEJESUS BRANDON N DEJESUS 1952 WELLINGTON STREET NAPLES, FL 34120---0 DEL VALLE, NANCY VICTOR M AVILES 3485 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 DELGADO, BELINDA 3610 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 DELGADO, TERESA 2685 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1406 I DANIEL, DONALD LEE JEAN MCGIBONEY DANIEL 2153 CLEMENTINE ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 DASCHKE, AMY & MICHAEL DENNIS 2035 SAGEBRUSH CIR NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4569 DAVILA, LUIS 3325 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 DE LAUFER ET AL, MARIA E F 9250 BELLEZA WAY #102 FORT MYERS, FL 33908 --- 0 DE SILVA, DIONNIE PARCHMENT 20011 SW 83RD AVE CUTLER BAY, FL 33189--- 2010 DE ZAYAS, FIDEL GOMEZ D CAROLINA SOLANO ESCOBAR 2680 OIL WELL RD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 DEL SOL, JORGE LUIS GRANEY MOREJON PINO 3319 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 DELANEY JR, RICHARD L EVELYN J DELANEY 2078 SATSUMA LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 DELGADO, ILEANA D 3865 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1531 DELINOIS, TED 2117 FAIRMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 DARCHE JR, PHILIP LEE JEAN ANN DARCHE 2211 VERMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I f DAVID & SHERYL ANDERSON TRUST 253 GALWAY DRIVE CARY, IL 60013---0 DAVIS, KENNETH R &JOYLETTY I I KENYA Y DAVIS 1160 16T11 AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3409 1 I DE MOMBLACK, KELY DURAN 5337 BRIN WAY AVE MARIA, FL 34142 --- 0 DE SOUSA, QUINTINO 812 96TH AVE N NAPLES, FL 34108 --- 0 DEARTH, DIANA E 2081 FAIRMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I (iI _1 l DEL VALLE, MARCOS U 2672 31ST AVE N E NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 f DELEON, DOUGLAS 3740 31ST AVE N E NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 417 1 I r DELGADO, ROXANA 2990 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1582 I DELLAPORTA, MARGARET A 2111 VERMONT LN i I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I I. Packet Pg. 916 9.A.4.c i DEMETRIOU, JOHN S 8593 WEBSTER HILLS ROAD DEXTER, MI 48130---0 DENIS CARPENTRY LLC 4274 6TH AVE S E NAPLES, FL 34117 --- 0 DEMAND, NICOLA & ELENA 2030 MANDARIN LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 DEVISSE, VIRGINIA 10701 GULF SHORE DR #201 NAPLES, FL 34108 --- 0 DEVRIES, TIMOTHY G & HELEN J 3591 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 DIAZ, MARCO LOPEZ ALIET GAMEZ DIAZ 2545 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 DIAZ, XIOMARA SOCARRAS 2846 EVERFGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 DIEPPA, REINALDO & CARIDAD 640 E 10TH AVE HIALEAH, FL 33010--- 4642 DINELLO, ROSE ANN 2254 HEYDON CIR W NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 DJURIC, IAN DAVID PETAR BRANDEE LYNN DJURIC 2262 VERMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 DEMOREST, JAMES ANDREA FIRTH 2067 VERMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 DENNIS J SHANKS REV TRUST MARY JO SHANKS REV TRUST 42WO30 HUGHES RD ELBURN, IL 60119 --- 0 DESHANO, ALAN & ELIZABETH A 2162 CLEMENTINE ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 DEVISSE, VIRGINIA 10701 GULF SHORE DR #201 NAPLES, FL 34108 --- 0 DIAZ, ALEXANDER GOYES DENY RODRIGUEZ 2972 37TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 DIAZ, MAVIS Y 2885 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 DIAZ-BARCELO, MARIA DEL C AMERICO SOLER 2064 HAMLIN STREET NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 DIETZ, PAUL 27730 W OO DMONT ST ROSEVILLE, MI 48066--- 2728 DINNEEN, SILVIA MARCOS SANTOS REYES 2383 BEAR CREEK DR #204 NAPLES, FL 34109 --- 0 DOAN, JONATHAN ALLEN CODY GRAVES DOAN 2238 VERMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 DEMORETT, PHILLIP C & LAURIE A 2060 SAGE BRUSH CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 3412-0 --- 0 DEPALMA, LAUREN M JOSEPH MIANULLI 14 MIDWOOD AVE FARMINGDALE, NY 11735 --- 0 DESIR, MARIE 3260 37TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 DEVISSE, VIRGINIA 2472 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 DIAZ, LUCY JESUSESTRADA 3929 SW 60TH AVE MIAMI, FL 33155--- 5016 DIAZ, MILAGROS DE LA CARIDAD 2420 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 DICARLO, ANTHONY & GRACE 47 SAYBROOK STREET STATEN ISLAND, NY 10314 --- 0 DIMEGLIO, ANTHONY & ROSALIA 2157 CLEMENTINE ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 DIRIENZO, LEONARDO & MICHELLE 1949 ANDERSON LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 DOEHRING, JAMES R & JUDY A 7136 CURTIS DR DARDENNE PRAIRIE, MO 63368--- 9600 Packet Pg. 917 9.A.4.c DOGER FAMILYTRUST DOMINGUEZ, JOSE MARIANO DONALD L SINK & MARIA A SINK 1441 SW 139TH AVE HOLLY LYN DOMINGUEZ FAMILY TRUST MIAMI, FL 33184--- 2768 2340 ORCHARD ST 2174 CLEMENTINE ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 DONALDSON, WILLIAM & BARDINA DONATE, PEDRO P MEJIAS DORCELIAN, LOUIS & ANGELENE 15060 92ND CT N i j YARELY URRUTIA MACHIN 244135TH AVE NE WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33412--- 2547 ! '. 241 BENSON ST j I NAPLES, FL 34112-- 0 I I NAPLES, FL 34113 --- 0 I DORENE P PIERCEALL REV TRUST �I DORSCHNER FAMILY TRUST it DORTA JR, RAMON & OLGA LIDIA 2267 HEYDON CIRCLE W 11640 COURT OF PALMS I 2970 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I I # 504 I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7401 i FT MYERS, FL 33908 --- 0 I DORVILUS, JEAN CLAUDE f DOTY, CORY DOUGHERTY, DALTON LEE 2012 SAGEBRUSH CIR 2075 VERMONT LN I I CIARA LUCILLE DOUGHERTY NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4568 I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 j 2842 41ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1580 DOUGLAS C ARMELLINO REV TRUST DOUROUNTOUDAKIS, NICK DREAM HOMES CONST GROUP LLC ADRIENNE J ARMELLINO REV TRUST 1515 146TH PL 4335 12TH ST N E 2081 HAMLIN ST WHITESTONE, NY 11357---3020 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 DRISCOLL, NICOLE N ( DROP, JACOB ALEXANDER j DRYSDALE, JOSHUA & LINDSAY 1978 FAIRMONT LANE KAROL VANESSA DROP 2296 DANCY ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 831 NW 84TH DR NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 CORALSPRINGS, FL 33071 --- 0 DU CHEMIN,JOHN PETER ❑UBIN, MICHAELJ DUBOCK, RONALD GEORGE JANET MARIE DU CHEMIN I 2066 MINNEOLAST BROOKE ELIZABETH DUBOCK 2180 VERMONT LANE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 1974 FAIRMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 DUBRAVA, LAWRENCE I DUNCKLEY, JASON & LAURA � DUNN, CONOR 25 SORGHUM RD 171 KIRKLAND DR CAROLINE C COVONE SHELTON, CT 06484--- 5828 NAPLES, FL 34110 --- 0 3715 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 DUNN, TODD & ANNETTE G DUPREE, R TERRY I DURAN, STEVE & IRIS AMANDA 2475 37TH AVE NE 108 CROSS CREEK BLVD ( 2469 HEYDON CIR E NAPLES, FL 34120---7452 PO BOX 238 NAPLES, FL 34120---0 TAMPA, FL 33647 --- 0 DWYER, JOY E I E S & P C PISANO REV LIV TRUST _ E&R HOUSING LLC 2218 HEYDON CIR W I 3660 33RD AVE NE I 2263 DANCY ST NAPLES, FL 34120---0 j ! NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1588 I � i i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I Packet Pg. 918 9.A.4.c EATMON III, DAMES DRIVER EBEID, MOHAMMAD EBEID, MOHAMMAD TARA LEIGHAN EATMON HIYAM EBEID I HIYAM EBEID 2210 VERMONT LN i 368 76TH STREET ;,. i 368 76TH STREET NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ;.: BROOKLYN, NY 11209 --- 0 ;_+ ;:.: i BROOKLYN, NY 11209 0 II i EBEID, RENAN ECHEMENDIA, VICTOR ECHEVERRIA, ARIELAGUILA NAREMAN EBEID ` 2774 29TH AVE NE I MARGARITA RODRIGUEZ GONZALEZ 359 GLENNEYRE CIR I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7412 3515 RANDALL BLVD ST AUGUSTINE, FL 32092 --- 0 I III I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ECHOLS II, ROBERT M ECKERTY, DONALD E EDMONDS, WILLIAM & GERTRUDE TENECIA A ECHOLS ( MARQUITA ROSE ECKERTY 151 HADDE AVE 2254 VERMONT LN 1992 PARSON ST CUMBERLAND, RI 02864--- 3542 NAPLES, FL 34120---0 I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 EDON INC I EDWARD & ROSA HUDOCK TRUST EDWARDS, LINCOLN PAUL 3210 35TH AVE NE 2192 VERMONT LN 1810 GLOVER ST NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3229 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 REDLANDS, CA 92374 --- 0 EFFNER, JOHN E ( EL SAYYAD LLC ELIAS JR, FREDERICK J LUBA DRAHOSZ 9340 GLENFOREST DR 1992 SAGEBRUSH CIR 2140 FAIRMONT LN I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120---4575 ELIAS, ZONSOLES FELIPE l ELIZABETH A BRUSHABER ELLIOTT, LESTER & ERMA R ALEJANDRO PICO HERNANDEZ LIVING TRUST 2320 37TH AVE NE 3274 27TH AVE NE I 2202 HEYDON CIRCLE W NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7542 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ELLIOTT, PRESTON I ELLOTT, LINFORD & DOROTHY EMERITA ASSOCIATED USA INC ANN-MARIE CRUICKSHANK 3470 27TH AVE NE ATTN DANA BEHAR 46 CARSTAIRS RD I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1509 744 BROAD ST STE 406 VALLEY STREAM, NY 11581 --- 0 I NEWARK, NJ 07102--- 3856 EMILIA CASTRO TRUST ( EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL 1121 14TH AVE NE LUTHERAN CHURCH I I LUTHERAN CHURCH OF NA INC NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 777 MOORING LINE DR 777 MOORING LINE DR NAPLES, FL 34102--- 4715 NAPLES, FL 34102---0 EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL j EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH OF NA INC LUTHERAN CHURCH OF NA INC I LUTHERAN CHURCH OF NA INC 777 MOORING LINE DR 777 MOORING LINE DR 777 MOORING LINE DR NAPLES, FL 34102 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34102 --- 0 I i I ' NAPLES, FL 34102 --- 0 EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL ;I EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN LUTHERAN CHURCH OF NA INC CHURCH OF NAPLES INC CHURCH OF NAPLES INC 777 MOORING LINE DR 1 I 777 MOORING LINE DR 777 MOORING LINE DR NAPLES, FL 34102-- 0 NAPLES, FL 34102---4715 NAPLES, FL 34102---4715 Packet Pg. 919 9.A.4.c EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH OF NAPLES INC CHURCH OF NAPLES INC CHURCH OF NAPLES INC 777 MOORING LINE DR 777 MOORING LINE DR 777 MOORING LINE DR NAPLES, FL 34102--- 4715 ! I NAPLES, FL 34102--- 4715 NAPLES, FL 34102--- 4715 I , EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN - CHURCH OF NAPLES INC I ; CHURCH OF NAPLES INC CHURCH OF NAPLES INC 777 MOORING LINE DR 777 MOORING LINE DR I 777 MOORING LINE DR NAPLES, FL 34102--- 4715 j i i NAPLES, FL 34102--- 4715 NAPLES, FL 34102--- 4715 EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN I ENDICOTT, GARY L & CAM VAN V I ENGEL, DONALD J i CHURCH OF NAPLES INC I 25 COUNTRYSIDE DR I DONNA BERNSTEIN ENGEL 777 MOORING LINE DR I ESSEX JUNCTION, VT 05452 --- 0 2344 ORCHARD STREET i NAPLES, FL 34102--- 4715 I I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ENSELL, RANDY ( ERCOLANI, JOSEPH P ERVIN, CHRISTINA 2690 27TH AVE NE I I JOSEPH F ERCOLANI I 3280 41ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1483 6017 PINE RIDGE RD #70 I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1501 NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 ESCOBAR, OSCAR L & DEBORA ESCOBAR-BARRIENTOS, LUIS F ESPARZA, JORGE ERNESTO CORTES 2384 37TH AVE NE PIEDAD DEL CARMEN MARULANDA ! LUCIA BELEN SIERRA GUTIERREZ NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7542 3690 37TH AVE NE 2141 CLEMENTINE ST NAPLES, FL 34120--- 2807 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ESPINO, YOLANDA R l / ESPINOSA, HEIKEL ESQUIJAROSA, ANGEL 501 DEER RUN I MILENA Y VILR LAUZAO 297124TH AVE NE MIAMI SPRINGS, FL 33166 --- 0 2745 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ESTATE MANAGEMENT INVEST INC ESTEVEZ, LAZARO Y EBANKS ESTRADA, FRANCISCO 6017 PINE RIDGE RD I 2885 27TH AVE NE 3355 35TH AVE NE P 0 BOX 241 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 ESTRELLA, ADALBERTO ETTER, TYLER SCOTT EUBANKS, NADINE 158 CARMITA AVE LAUREN MARYSE ETTER 2443 31ST AVE NE RUTHERFORD, NJ 07070---0 2169 CLEMENTINE ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 EVEROIL LLC EVERY, CAROL FAIRMONT RESIDENTS ASSN INC ( 613 CORBEL DR I 2387 HEYDON CIR E i %KEB MANAGEMENT NAPLES, FL 34110 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120---0 6017 PINE RIDGE RD #262 NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 I I FAMULARE, EDWARD J & KATHLEEN FAN FAN, GAMALIEL j FARINAS, VICTOR 2970 35TH AVE NE j 3570 31ST AVE NE ; 9795 SW 114 ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 , NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4485 MIAMI, FL 33176 --- 0 Packet Pg. 920 9.A.4.c FASCHING, SAMANTHA 3585 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 FAZIO, WENDY A 2940 37TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1579 FEHR, LORI ANN & JAMES ANTHONY 2155 VERMONT LANE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 FERAN, JAMES 2430 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--0 FERIA, ARTHUR 3320 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1777 FERNANDEZ, AUGUSTO 3585 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1557 FERNANDEZ, EDENY 3015 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 FERNANDEZ, ERWIN LEYDISBEL JAIME ROBAINA 3397 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 FERNANDEZ, JULIO L & GINAKARNA 3333 33RD AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1539 FERNANDEZ, RAUL M 3360 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1506 FAULKNER,SUSAN A JOAN EDYTHE HARPRING 2298 VERMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120-- 0 i FEATHERSTONE, CAROLINA D i 2550 RANDALL BLVD I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 FELIX SR, GERALD D MARIE THERESE LOUIS GERALD D FELIXJR SEAN FELIX 21464 WHITEHALL TER QUEENS VILLAGE, NY 11427--- 1829 FERDOWSIEPOUR, GHOLAM NOOSHI SALEHI 1312 NW 89TH TER PEMBROKE PINES, FL 33024--- 4639 fr FERIA, ARTHUR & YANARA I 3320 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1777 FERNANDEZ, DAISY MARINA 2390 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7503 FERNANDEZ, EDENY 3015 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120---1575 FERNANDEZ, FRANCISCO E KITTY SHAMEE FERNANDEZ 3290 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34.120---0 FAUNCE, SCOTT ANDREW 2222 VERMONT LN i i� NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I 1 FEBLES, YONNIE FUNDORA CARIDAD SIERRA LEYVA 322124TH AVE NE i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 t 1 FELIX SR, GERALD D j MARIE THERESE LOUIS GERALD GERALD D FELIX JR SEAN FELIX 21464 WHITEHALL TER QUEENS VILLAGE, NY 11427--- 1829 FERGANG, SCOTT & BARBRA L 287 NORTH CENTRAL AVE i RAMSEY, NJ 07446 --- 0 l FERNANDEZJR, FRANCISCO R YANELY FERNANDEZ '..; 2930 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 7} •,Y . _ FERNANDEZ, DOMINGO II DANIA PERAZA 268137TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 • l FERNANDEZ, ERIK C TERRATRUST LLC 13721 SW 13TH ST MIAMI, FL 33928---0 FERNANDEZ, JOANNA JUAN R FERNANDEZ 3746 33RD AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 FERNANDEZ, LAZARO & YENEY D FERNANDEZ, MIRYAN 3594 29TH AVE NE ! I 13841 HEANEY AVE m NAPLES, FL 34120--- 2821 ORLANDO, FL 32827 --- 0 I k i W I I FERNANDEZ, ROSA MARIAM FERNANDO D &STEPHANIE R CORTES d I i DARREN TAYLOR LIVING TRUST E I 2038 MANDARIN LN I 3919 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 li a Packet Pg. 921 9.A.4.c FERREIRA, JOHN H FERRELL, JEFFREY H & JANE FERRER, JOSE ENRIQUE & BEATRIZ BEATRIZ REYES 40 COPPER VALLEY CT i 20400 SW 49 CT 14694 SW 46TH TER CHESHIRE, CT 06410 --- 0 SOUTHWEST RANCHE, FL 33332 --- 0 MIAMI, FL 33175--- 8910 I i . i I FERRER, MARLENE FERRERA, HUMBERTO I FESSER, IVAN SANDRA LATA i ! 273131ST AVE NE ANN 0 FESSER 10001 NW 135TH ST I I NAPLES, FL 34120---4477 I 450 SWAN AVE HIALEAH, FL 33018--- 1665 I MIAMI SPRINGS, FL 33166--- 3931 FIELD, TYLER VINCENT i I FIGUEROA, KARLA & ANGEL FIGURELLI REVOCABLE TRUST JOANNE MARIE FIELD ( 2195 VERMONT LANE 2102 HAMLIN ST 2203 DANCY ST I I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34120---0 I NAPLES, FL 34120---0 FIRST, DANAT & CAROL A \ FL STAR CONSTRUCTION LLC FL STAR CONSTRUCTION LLC 2053 HAMLIN STREET I 7742 ALICO RD 7742 ALICO RD j NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 FORT MYERS, FL 33912 --- 0 ` FORT MYERS, FL 33912 --- 0 FLEMING, JENNIFER FLEMING, LANCE &TAMI I ' l FLEMING, LANCE &TAMI 2835 41ST AVE NE I 3040 OIL WELL RD 3040 OIL WELL ROAD NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1581 NAPLES, FL 34120---1459 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i FLEMING, LANCE J & TAMI S FLEMING, LANCE J & TAMMI S l FLOAREA, ADRIAN i 3040 OIL WELL RD 3040 OIL WELL RD I 2094 SATSUMA LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1459 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 FLOOD, BENJAMIN P & MEGAN J I FLORENCE STURDIVANT, MARTHA A I I i FLORES JR, FELIX & DAISY 3360 33RD AVE NE I 331 BRINKLEY RD 18123 SW 87TH PL NAPLES, FL 34120---0 1 POWDER SPRINGS, GA 30127 --- 0 PALMETTO BAY, FL 33157---5984 FLORES, FELIX & DAISY i FLORES, LUIS & RASA I FLORES, MARIA MARCELA 18123 SW 87TH PL 2243 DANCY ST 3375 35TH AVE NE PALMETTO BAY, FL 33157--- 5984 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1516 ' 1 FLORES, MARIO ENRIQUE FLORIDA RIVERS CONSTRUCTION I I ' FLOTHE, JAMES MILO ' JEMIMA B HERNANDEZ SALAMANCA LLC I I NICOLE LEE FLOTHE 2025 FAIRMONT LANE 4180 33RD AVE NE I 1965 SAGEBRUSH CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1534 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ; I FOIANINI,ANDRES FONTAINE, WILMAS I I FONTAINE, WILMAS 1345 CHARLESTON SQUARE DR I 240 WAGON TRACE LN I. 240 WAGON TRACE LN #201 j KERNERSVILLE, NC 27284 --- 0 KERNERSVILLE, NC 27284-- 0 NAPLES, FL 34110 --- 0 Packet Pg. 922 9.A.4.c FONTE,JOSE IRIS ARBOLAEZ 3680 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---4491 FORTE, JUANA M ANGELA FORTE 3285 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3204 FORTILUS, CHARLES & COLETTE 4898 SW 183RD AVE MIRAMAR, FL 33029--- 6321 FOWLER, RAYMOND LEE 2460 41ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 FRANCO, CESAR A 2420 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120--- 5539 FRANCOIS, HEROLD 2680 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7408 FRANZ, WILLIAM S CHRISTINE M GRANDJEAN 2156 FAIRMONT LN j NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4575 FREDEEN, ROBERT A & ROBYN L 2299 VERMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i FUENTES, JULIA 2621 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1527 I 1 FUSCO, CHRISTOPHER & KRISTA 2008 PARSON ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 FORCMA, JOHN L & MARCELLA B 3370 W STREETSBORO RD RICHFIELD, OH 44286 --- 0 i I� I,l I� II II -I I ,I I I l 1 . FORTES, HUGO LAZARO JESSIE FORTES 14752 SW 169TH LN MIAMI, FL 33187--- 1744 FOULDSJR EST, JOHN L 1963 ART SCHOOL RD CHESTER SPRINGS, PA 19425 --- 0 FOX, ANGEL 1999 PARSON ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 FRANCO, GABY S YASIEL DEPEW FERNANDEZ 3335 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 FRANCOIS, JOHN GARY 4523 31ST AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116 --- 0 FRASER,DONOVAN GAYAUTE COLLEEN SIMONE FRASER 244137TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 FREDERICKS, HAROLD E JUSTINE WILLIAMS 2944 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 FUENTES, JULIA 2621 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1527 FWY CORPORATION 1350 SW 175TH WAY PEMBROKE PINES, FL 33029--- 4824 FORS, CARLOS 2951 SW 136 CT MIAMI, FL 33175---0 I FORTIER-CRUZ, KERMIN ANTONIO DANIELLE LEE DALLA COSTA 2908 41ST AVENUE NE j NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i I I , FOUSEK, EDWARD S 2449 HEYDON CIR E NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 _ FRANCIS, LEONE SERAPHIM 2208 DANCY ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I FRANCOIS, EDDIE K ANIATHAMAR BREVIL FRANCOIS 2732 27TH AVENUE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 FRANZ,JUERGEN 2112 PARSON ST NAPLES, FL 34120---0 FRATERNALE, MATTHEW & LORI B 7 NEWTON CT CROTON ON HUDSON, NY 10520 --- 0 I i" FRIGOLA, CARLOS ALONSO LISBETT DIAZ 2196 CARA CARA WAY NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I. FUENTES, ROBERTO C YEREMIS FURENTES 2570 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 GABELA, LUIS OMAR j SYLVYA MILENA AYALA i I CAMILA NICOLE GABELA 7984 BRISTOL CIR j NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 Packet Pg. 923 9.A.4.c GAINZA, YOAS MATOS GALICIA, MILTON 2485 RANDALL BLVD MARISOL GALICIA NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3573 3340 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1777 GALLARDO, EUGENIO GALLEGOS, LLOLANDA & JOSE A 3822 SW 171 AVE 2985 RANDALL BLVD MIRAMAR, FL 33027 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 5503 i I GALVIN, LINDA L GAMA, LAURA 2845 31ST AVE NE JASON MATTHEW HAMMOND NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4541 3045 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i GAMBLE JR, ROBERT i l GAMBOA, SUSET & YOELVY i 7664 S TRENTON DR I 2544 39TH AVE NE CENTENNIAL, CO 80112---2613 I NAPLES, FL 34120---0 GARCIA JR, RONALD W & NICOLE 1 GARCIA RIVERA, JOSE A 3720 35TH AVE NE I ERIKA DEL VALLE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 2562 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 GARCIA, ALBERTO ( GARCIA, ALBERTO 3450 RANDALL BLVD JOSEFINAY MARTIN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I 2820 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3484 l GARCIA, DIANA C � GARCIA, EHOLIA KATIUSKA 2480 31ST AVE NE 3320 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 5548 GARCIA, HECTOR ELISEO 1' GARCIA, JOSE 3030 RANDALL BLVD 3282 31ST AVE NE I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120---0 GARCIA, JOSE R VASQUEZ I 1 GARCIA, JULIO L GLENDA C CASTRO GUZMAN I AURORA RIVERO I I 3690 31ST AVE NE I 1875 NW 20TH AVE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i MIAMI, FL 33125---1423 i j GARCIA, LEONARDO RAFAEL I GARCIA, LUBIA ALVAREZ - 2382 HEYDON CIR E ; i JORGE LUIS ROGRIGUEZ LIMA NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I 3540 33RD AVE NE j NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 GALLAGHER, KEVIN & KRISTEN 11807 KENT GROVE DR SPRING HILL, FL 34610--- 8842 GALVAN, ALFREDO 2535 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7411 GAMARRA, WESLEY D GLORIA RINCON 3220 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 GAMEZ, FELIPE MARIA ANGEL SERRANO HERNANDEZ 3235 37TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 GARCIA ROMERO, ALAN FRANCISCO 3039 ELICE WAY NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 GARCIA, ALBERTO, A & NOEMI 2545 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7406 GARCIA, ESPERANZA CONTRERAS YOLANDA LLANAS 1530 23RD ST SW NAPLES, FL 34117--- 4322 GARCIA, JOSE DOLORES 2535 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1404 GARCIA, JUSTO N & ROSA M 2945 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120---5503 GARCIA, MARIO 5730 W 14TH AVE HIALEAH, FL 33012--- 2217 Packet Pg. 9 47 9.A.4.c GARCIA, MATTHEW D GARCIA, OMAR & MARIAM VIVIAN VALDES 3473 27TH AVE NE 3282 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I 'I GARCIA, RAMON & MARGARITA GARCIA, RENE & ASTRID I 3640 31ST AVE NE I 3250 CYPRESS GLEN WAY APT 405 i NAPLES, FL 34120---0 I i NAPLES, FL 34109--- 3878 I GARCIA, ROGELIO GARCIA, ROGERIO J PO BOX 10673 1701 SW DESERT AVE NAPLES, FL 34101 --- 673 PORT SAINT LUCIE, FL 34953 --- 0 GARRAPUTA, LISA & GREGORY J GARRETT, EMILY ROSE 2114 HAMLIN ST I DORSEY HAROLD GARRETT NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I I 2278 VERMONT LANE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 GARZA, RENE CASPAR, ELIEZER J LUZ CERVANTES ALYSSA ROSE MUNOZ 2585 41ST AVE NE 3620 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 2837 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 GATOR INVESTMENT OF SW FLA INC GATTIE, RICHARD A 2824 16TH AVE NE 2420 41ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 2804 GAUT, MARTIN EDWARD ( GAVILANES, LUIS A TINA RENEE WARREN CAROLINE SOTO ( 3710 33RD AVE NE 3725 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1879 GEARING, DAVID S GEDEUS, ADELINE & NATHAN I' MARLENE SAMONTANEZ GEARING 2336 51ST ST SW 22SS DANCY ST NAPLES, FL 34116 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 GENERALE, JULIANO GERTRUDE POINT LLC LIUDMYLA GENERALE 515 SW 63RD CT 2520 41ST AVE N E MIAMI, FL 33144 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 f I I i GIANSANTI, NEIL W GIBSON, KAMILAH 2290 VERMONT LN i i 17420 SW 108 AVE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 i ( MIAMI, FL 33157---0 j I � i GARCIA, RAMON 2730 6TH AVENUE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 GARCIA, ROBERT STEVE ROSHELLE I SANTIAGO SANTOS 2109 CLEMENTINE STREET NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 GARCIA, Y EMILIO RODRIGUEZ 291135TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 GARY J MADAY REV TRUST 2572 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 GASTON, MICHAELT & LAURA L 541 FISHER RD CABOT, PA 16023 --- 0 GAUSE,ZENFORD KAREN M WILLIAMS-GAUSE 2125 FAIRMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120---4576 GAVINA, JESUS CANO RAQUEL CANO 2830 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 GEIGER, JON RUSSELL MARGARET ANN GEIGER SHIELA MARIE TRAGO 2287 DANCY ST NAPLES, FL 34120---0 GG6 NAPLES LLC 3744 SW 30TH AVE FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33312 --- 0 GILL, BRIAN J 2362 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 Packet Pg. 925 9.A.4.c GILL, INDERBIR & NAVNEET KAUR GIMENEZ, ARMANDO J & CHERI L 1126 HILLCREST AVE 1925 WELLINGTON ST ! , PASADENA, CA 91106---0 i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I ' ' GIROUD, MADELYN i I GLORIA ESTHER CRUZ TRUST JORGE ALBERTO GIROUD I 600 BILTMORE WAY APT 709 2091 VERMONT LN j CORAL GABLES, FL 33134---7531 I I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4560 ! I I I GODOY JR, ALEX I I � � GODOY, ALAN CORINA FELICIA GODOY I CINDY N SANTOS ! 2540 35TH AVE NE i 2540 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I I� GODOY, ALEXIS & TAYME i GOEDEKE, MARGARITA MADERA j 2540 35TH AVE NE 2785 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --1473 NAPLES, FL 34120---4477 I I I GOLDEN GATE OF NAPLES INC GOMEZ FAMILY TRUST 1 1687 EVERGLADES BLVD S % FANNY GOMEZ f NAPLES, FL 34117 --- 0 7950 NW 13TH ST PEMBROKE PINES, FL 33024 --- 0 GOMEZ, MIGUEL A & MARIBEL C i GOMEZ, PAUL i 4430 KENTUCKY WAY 2227 VERMONT LN AVE MARTA, FL 34142--- 5016 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I GONGORA, ANTONIO ALEJANDRO GONGORA, PEDRO F j ANGELICA M BRINEZ AGUILERA 2760 35TH AVE NE 3260 27TH AVE N E NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 • I GONZALES, RENE GONZALEZ, ANTONIO MAY QUON 3045 35TH AVE NE 48JOAN DR NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1778 NEW CITY, NY 10956 --- 0 II GONZALEZ, BLANCA E GONZALEZ, CARLOS A I l i 2865 24TH AVE NE 2660 8TH AVE SE i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ` NAPLES, FL 34117 --- 0 GONZALEZ, HENIE & RAFAEL GONZALEZ, MARTA 248122ND AVE NE REINALDO MARTINEZ NAPLES, FL 34120---3569 I 2923 EVERGLADES BLVD N i NAPLES, FL 34120--- 2816 GIRALDO, SANDRA 2098 SATSUMA LANE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 GLORICH HOLDINGS INC PO BOX 170332 HIALEAH, FL 33017 --- 332 GODOY, ALAN & CINDY 2540 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 GOLDEN DREAM INVESTORS LLC 2087 WEST 76TH ST HIALEAH, FL 33016 --- 0 GOMEZ, CARLOS RAFAEL AMANDA LUCIA GOMEZ 2212 DANCY ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 GOMEZ, SARA RANGEL MARCO A RAMIREZ FRANCISCA.RODRIGUEZ GAMBOA 2430 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 GONZALES, JULIO CESAR 2199 DANCY ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 GONZALEZ, BEATRIZ M HERNANDEZ HUGO HERNANDEZ VAZQUEZ 12120TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 GONZALEZ, GONZALO E ERIC GONZALEZ 299 E 39TH PL HIALEAH, FL 33013--- 2264 GONZALEZ, MICHEL L & EVELYN 2863 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 Packet Pg. 926 9.A.4.c GONZALEZ, OMAYDA GONZALEZ, PORFIRIO 1 i GONZALEZ, RAFAEL DANIEL AYERBE RICHARD GONZALEZ 2760 39TH AVE NE 2830 29TH AVE NE 2785 EVERGLADES BLVD N i I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1439 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7414 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 GONZALEZ, RICHARD P GONZALEZ, ROY i GONZALEZ, RUBEN C & BELKYS C MILADYS GONZALEZ I 3390 33RD AVE NE ; i 2585 RANDALL BLVD 2775 EVERGLADES BLVD N I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1568 �I I! GONZALEZ, ZUZEL GONZALEZ-GONZALEZ, JESUS L GOODY, ALAN I ANTONIA R GARCIA LOZANO I GREIZY PEREZ 2540 35TH AVE NE 2440 35TH AVE NE I 2137 FAIRMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34120---0 i GORDON SR, STEVEN J & ROBIN L GRANAT, WOJCIECH & MARIA j GRANT, PAUL 2365 31ST AVE NE 2 KATIE RD 2940 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---443 LEMONT, IL 60439 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 GRAU, STEP HEN P & AMY L GRAY, GLENN N & CAROL H GRAY, THOMAS J & SANDRA 2015 SAGEBRUSH CIR 2113 PARSON ST 2540 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4569 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7407 GRAY, TYLER GREEN JR, JEFFREY ALAN GREEN, GIZELY 2770 31ST ST AVE NE 2877 41ST AVE NE 3543 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 15S7 GREER, CLIFFORD L & KAMERAN R GREGORY SAGE & ALEJANDRO I GRELA, HERMIS 2065 FAIRMONT LN I MEJIA REVOCABLE TRUST OSMIN GARCIA NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4574 2069 HAMLIN ST 2665 27TH AVE NE I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120---0 r GRMD INVESTMENTS LLC GROVES AT ORANGE BLOSSOM I' GROVES AT ORANGE BLOSSOM 11400 SW 43 TERR ( MASTER ASSOCIATION INC 1 ( MASTER ASSOCIATION INC MIAMI, FL 33165--- 3316 % KEB MGMT I % KEB MGMT 6017 PINE RDIGE RD #262 I 6017 PINE RIDGE RD #262 i I I NAPLES, FL 34119---0 I NAPLES, FL 34119---0 GROVES AT ORANGE BLOSSOM GROVES AT ORANGE BLOSSOM ` GROVES AT ORANGE BLOSSOM MASTER ASSOCIATION INC MASTER ASSOCIATION INC ( ! MASTER ASSOCIATION INC % KEB MGMT % KEB MGMT I % KEB MGMT � 6017 PINE RIDGE RD #262 6017 PINE RIDGE RD #262 6017 PINE RIDGE RD #262 NAPLES, FL 34119 0 ! NAPLES, FL 34119---0 I NAPLES, FL 34119---0 GROVES AT ORANGE BLOSSOM GROVES AT ORANGE BLOSSOM GROVES AT ORANGE BLOSSOM I i MASTER ASSOCIATION INC MASTER ASSOCIATION INC I MASTER ASSOCIATION INC % KEB MGMT i % KEB MGMT % KEB MGMT 6017 PINE RIDGE RD #262 6017 PINE RIDGE RD #262 6017 PINE RIDGE RD #262 NAPLES, FL 34119---0 NAPLES, FL 34119---0 j NAPLES, FL 34119 - 0 I Packet Pg. 927 9.A.4.c GROVES AT ORANGE BLOSSOM GROVES AT ORANGE BLOSSOM GROVES AT ORANGE BLOSSOM MASTER ASSOCIATION INC MASTER ASSOCIATION INC MASTER ASSOCIATION INC KEB MGMT % KEB MGMT % KEB MGMT 6017 PINE RIDGE RD #262 6017 PINE RIDGE RD #262 6017 PINE RIDGE RD #262 NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 i NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 GROVES AT ORANGE BLOSSOM GROVES AT ORANGE BLOSSOM GUCIK, SIGISMUND MASTER ASSOCIATION INC ! MASTER ASSOCIATION INC i 5310 MCBRIDE AVE KEB MGMT i %KEB MGMT i I CLEVELAND, OH 44127--- 1555 6017 PINE RIDGE RD #262 I 6017 PINE RIDGE RD #262 NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 i I GUEDES, ERNESTO R GUERRA, NOEL & NORMA GUERRERO JR, DOUGLAS ADRIAN CRISTINA A PASQUALI i 2895 RANDALL BLVD I I BRICEYDA NATHALY GUERRERO 241127TH AVE NE I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 5590 i I 2490 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i i I I NAPLES, FL 34120 0 GUERRERO, ROLANDO HERRERA 1 ( GUILLAUME, WILFRIDO GUISAO-SENQUIZ, CARMEN G 3630 33RD AVE NE I BRENDA MAHLALELA EFREN AROCHO RIVERA NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1588 I 2845 39TH AVE NE 2471 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i GURREA, STEVEN MICHAEL GUTIERREZ, ANDREA ( GUTIERREZ, RADIEL THUSSANNEE LAPSOPA ALEJANDRA GUTIERREZ l 2782 35TH AVE NE 2770 37TH AVE NE 2925 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7460 I GUTTENFELDER, GLENDAN L ( GUZMAN, IRMA ( GUZMELI, BARBARA MONICA D GUTTENFELDER 3240 37TH AVE NE 2618 35TH AVE NE 2121 CLEMENTINE STREET I NAPLES, FL 34120---1507 NAPLES, FL 34120--1405 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 iI RAGE, CHAWKI M HAM, EMILIO A & EDA E HAMILTON, DEBORAH 2390 ORCHARD ST 12221 SW 24TH TER 2079 VERMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MIAMI, FL 33175--- 7308 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 HAMPTON, JAYNE HANSELMAN, ALICIA & JON HANSEN, THOMAS AMY ELIZABETH KOMNINOS 2259 HEYDON CIR W JINE M LESLIE I 2050 MINNEOLA ST - NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 2988 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7459 HARPER, ALFREDO C & FRANCES F HARRADEN, JONATHAN M I HARRIS, KENNETH R 288124TH AVE NE 3295 31STAVE NE ( 1701 S OLIVE AVE NAPLES, FL 34120---3524 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 449 WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 --- 0 I HARRIS, STEVEN N HARRISON III, CHARLES WILLIAM HART, ERIC PAUL 2840 31ST AVE NE CHRISTINE NICOLE HARRISON i CHIANTELLE BOUCHARD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 2076 HAMLIN ST 2216 DANCY ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- D NAPLES, FL 34120---0 I! Packet Pg. 928 9.A.4.c HAUVER EST, THOMAS HAVI LLC HAYES, JAMES DOUGLAS r C/O ESTHER SW HAUVER FENG 2098 COVE LN I SHELLI JO HAYES 917 N SPOEDE RD i WESTON, FL 33326 --- 0 2362 31ST AVE NE E SAINT LOUIS, MO 63146--- 5525 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 E 0 i U HC &SONS LLC HC & SONS LLC 1 HC & SONS LLC 25211 PINSON DR i i 25211 PINSON DR i 25211 PINSON DR V BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135 --- 0 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135 --- 0 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135 0 = I i ! d � 7 � J HC & SONS LLC HC & SONS LLC I HEIMBERGER, BRANDON 25211 PINSON DR 25211 PINSON DR I ELIZABETH HEIMBERGER BONITASPRINGS, FL 34135 --- 0 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135 --- 0 I 2185 CLEMENTINE ST i I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 E i I I W ' HEINTZ, RANDY LEE l ( HELMERTR, JAMES & MARTA A HENDERSON, GARY B SHELBY LEE HEINTZ I HELMER FAMILY TRUST 2318 HEYDON CIR W 2560 41ST AVE NE UTD 11/19/04 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 c NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 1780 HILLCREST DR N VENTURA, CA 93001--- 2332 C o i 0 HENRY, GREG ANTHONIO HERARD, PETERSON & SANTHA HEREDIA, DANIEL DARIO N 3466 29TH AVE NE I 2029 FAIRMONT LN I 3622 29TH AVE NE J NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 a 0 Lo ao N HERNANDEZ, AMARILLIS NUNEZ HERNANDEZ, E EZEQUIEL RIVERA l HERNANDEZ, ELBIS N 2026 FAIRMONT LN ALEXANDREA E RIVERA 3575 31ST AVE NE _ NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 3426 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---4486 C NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 N HERNANDEZ, ELIECER OLANO HERNANDEZ, HUSSEIN HERNANDEZ, JUAN CARLOS N 2420 35TH AVE NE 2872 RANDALL BLVD BLANCA E RESENDIZ PADRON o NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 4035 EVERGLADES BLVD o 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 0 I N )I 1. a r HERNANDEZ, JULIA & GEORGE ( HERNANDEZ, KEILY HERNANDEZ, KEILY N ea PO BOX 227584 ( 2536 39TH AVE NE 2536 39TH AVE NE 12254 SW 1ST ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MIAMI, FL 33222 --- 0 IL HERNANDEZ, KYRA HERNANDEZ, LAZARO HERNANDEZ, LUCIA C V 3322 35TH AVE NE ( BELKIS RIVES RAMON DIAZ m NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 f 3780 EVERGLADES BLVD N 2765 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3241 I I NAPLES, FL 34108---2320 W HERNANDEZ, LUIS I HERNANDEZ, RODOLFO BRITO I HERNANDEZ, ROLISBEL d 3235 31ST AVE NE SOKHAMALA SAY 1912 45TH ST SW NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 449 SUTHA SAY ! NAPLES, FL 34116 --- 0 2191 VERMONT LANE i i � NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I , Q 1 Packet Pg. 929 9.A.4.c HERNANDEZ, SEBASTIANA HERNANDEZ, WILLIAM M HERNANDO, GLORIA PO BOX 11346 DARLENE V HERNANDEZ 2066 MANDARIN LN NAPLES, FL 34101 --- 0 2074 SATSUMA LANE NAPLES, FL 34120---4554 I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i HERRERA, JORGE ENRIQUE ZAMORA HERRERA, JUAN Y HERRERA, MIGUEL F & NORMA C 115 MIAMI GARDENS RD 3540 EVERGLADES BLVD N 3317 S TOWNER ST WEST PARK, FL 33023 --- 0 t �I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I I I SANTA ANA, CA 92707 --- 0 � HERRERA, NIURKA I I HERRERA, NIURKA I HERRERA, OSIEL 2835 29TH AVE NE JOSE R RODRIGUEZ 2586 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 2835 29TH AVE NE I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7404 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 HERRERA-BARRIOS, MABEL RENEE l HIDALGO, FRANCISCO J t HIGDON TR, GAREY D MARIO HERRERA I FIORELLA S CIEZA DE LEON TR DTD 8-5-88 2378 ORCHARD ST PO BOX 960461 PO BOX 221769 NAPLES, FL 34120--0 I MIAMI, FL 33296 --- 461 LOUISVILLE, KY 40252--- 1769 HIGGINS, DAVID MICHAEL HINCHLIFFE, GREGORY M HINES, GARFIELD VALERY ANNE HIGGINS I RACHEL A HINCHLIFFE EDELL HINES 2110 SATSUMA LANE I 2275 HEYDON CIR W 4665 8TH ST NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 14120--- 4585 ( NAPLES, FL 34120--- 2904 HINES, MICHAEL &TAMARA HINLEY, PATRICIA LEE 1 ( HIPWELL, BRANDON H 2S25 31ST AVE NE 2585 27TH AVE NE I NATASHA CHELSEY HIPWELL NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 456 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 1984 PARSON ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i HITE, TRAVIS I HITTINGER TR, HELMUT & LYNDA ) HITTINGER TR, HELMUT & LYNDA JULIANA GARCIA ( HELMUT HITTINGER R/T 4-29-91 HELMUT HITTINGER R/T 4-29-91 2935 39TH AVE NE 530 RIDGEWOOD ST 530 RIDGEWOOD ST I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I I ALTAMONTE SPRING, FL 32701 --- 0 I ALTAMONTE SPRING, FL 32701 --- 0 l�I HITTINGER TR, HELMUT & LYNDA HITTINGER TR, HELMUT & LYNDA HOELAND, CHRISTOPHER HELMUT HITTINGER R/T 4-29-91 I HELMUT HITTINGER R/T 4-29-91 ARACELI TERRONES 530 RIDGEWOOD ST ` 533 RIDGEWOOD ST ' 2246 HEYDON CIR W ALTAMONTE SPRNGS, FL 32701 --- 0 I ALTAMONTE SPRNGS, FL 32701 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I HOFFMAN, DEREK & KRISTA HOLCOMB, JASON C & JOAN HOLMACHEA, YANET CABRERA 2056 HAMLIN ST I 2770 27TH AVE NE I i 2910 37TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120---433 V I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 II HOLMER IV, GEORGE E & CASSIE A HOLMES, BRADLEY THOMAS t HOLT EST, BARBARA F 2470 37TH AVE NE KRISTINE NICOLE H RODRIGUEZ i % DENISE DAVENE LAPE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7451 ' 1859 ALAMEDA DR 816 AMETHYST WAY NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 VALRICO, FL 33594 --- 0 i Packet Pg. 930 9.A.4.c HORSFORD, JACQUELINE L HORTA, ANDRES 872 E 59TH ST EDUARDINA HORTA BROOKLYN, NY 11234--- 1804 MILAGROS AMARILIS IGLESIAS 445 NW 20TH AVE MIAMI, FL 33125--- 3464 I HOVLAND, JODY LYNN HTH GROUP INC i 283124TH AVE NE 5455 SW 8TH STREET STE 210 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3524 t MIAMI, FL 33134--- 2718 I I I I HUGHES, LISSA 1 HURLEY JOINT TRUST 282124TH AVE NE 2286 VERMONT LANE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 3524 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 HUSSMANN, HARALD & BETZABE HUTSON, AUSTIN R 4500 22ND ST SE I 2481 SOUTH URBANA LISBON RD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 SOUTH CHARLESTON, OH 45368--- 9750 IBALMEA, YOSEM LAUZARDO IGLESIAS, IVAN ZULEYMIS RIESGO CARDOSO 2695 27TH AVE NE 2615 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1484 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ILAGAN, EMILIANO & LOLITA ILAGAN, EMILIANO & LOLITA 6906 LA MIRADA DR 6906 LA MIRADA DR HOUSTON, TX 77083---2439 HOUSTON, TX 77083--- 2439 IMONDI, PAIGE & CHARLES A INFANTE, ROLANDO DASHIELL 2345 31ST AVE NE 000 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---443 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 INTERARTCENTER LLC IRIZARRYTR, TRIANA L 4259 RAFFIA PALM CIR TRIANA L IRIZARRY LIVING TRUST NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 200 SW 136TH PL MIAMI, FL 33184--- 1051 IZZO, MARK & DARLENE J & D INVEST LLC 1936 WELLINGTON ST 3840 28TH AVE SE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34117 --- 0 JACKSON, JONATHAN LEON JAGUAR & COLUMBUS BLVD LLC JENNA LYNN JACKSON 8000 NW 7TH ST STE 201 3485 RANDALL BLVD MIAMI, FL 33126 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i i I � 1 i I HOULE, THOMAS H 2070 MANDARIN LN NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4554 91 HUFFMAN, WALTER T & MARIA C 2460 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3572 HUSSMANN, BETZABE STEFANIE ANDRE 4500 22ND STREET NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 HUYNH,LOAN 1276 ENBROOK LOOP NAPLES, FL 34114 --- 0 IGNATENKO, MIGUEL D 2975 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7400 I LOTZ LLC 2148 GROVE DR NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 INNOCENT, DAVIDSON 3174 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120---0 IZQUIERDO, DANAYS EDGAR M FLORES 3675 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 JACKO JR ET UX, ANDREW 1306 FRANKLIN LN ROCKAWAY, NJ 07866--- 5814 JAIN, SHAILENDRA KUMAR 2330 HEYDON CIR E NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 Packet Pg. 931 9.A.4.c JAMES, ABASI & MAEVA JAMES, JERRY L & PEGGY L JANE A GRETHEL REV LIV TRUST 3272 35TH AVE NE 1627 PRIMROSE LN 13010 SOUTHAMPTON DR NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 FAIRBORN, OH 4S324--- 8741 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135--- 2465 JANUARIS LLC JARVIS, ROBERT C JASS FL INVESTMENTS LLC 2053 FAIRMONT LN JENNIFER J URNESS i 6605 HUNTINGTON LAKES CIR #201 i NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4574 i 9351 SUMMER PL I NAPLES, FL 34119- -0 NAPLES, FL 34109--- 7316 JEAN LOUIS, MIRLENE BERNADIN i JEAN, RUTH MARSHA I JEANNOWALNA JORDANIS JEAN LOUIS I I PASCAL HERODE CHARITE 3707 JUSS TICE CIR I 321131ST AVE NE j 2204 CLEMENTINE ST IMM01<ALEE, FL 34142- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ( NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I ►_ I l JENKINS, DEBORAH G / JENKINS, KOBY G 1 JENNETTE, SARAJANE 1939 WELLINGTON ST LOURDES LOPEZ JENKINS 7023 BELLARD CT j NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 3595 27TH AVE NE RALEIGH, NC 27617 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120---1557 I JENSEN, JODIE KAY j JFD NAPLES LLC i JIMENEZ, LOSE L MARICELA 1904 WELLINGTON ST I 11693 BALD EAGLE WAY MARICELA RAMIREZ ORNELAS NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4320 2113 FAIRMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4576 I l JIMENEZ, JOSE LUIS JIMENEZ-PEREZ, JENNIFER l i i JOEL, DAVID & MARISSA LUISA MARIA MATUTE MOREIRA DELBY PEREZ 238135TH AVE NE 2860 41ST AVE NE 2465 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I JOHANNSEN, NICHOLAS I' JOHN F LEWIS TRUST t JOHN, ANNAMMA K 2002 FAIRMONT LN 2760 MARSH POINT LN SE ( 2037 FAIRMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120---0 SOUTHPORT, NC 28461---8504 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ' JOHNSON, AUSTIN S & LESLIE K l JOHNSON, CHRISTOPHER L , JOHNSON, GARY E 2004 PARSON ST I CECILI M JOHNSON I 2640 31ST AVE NE I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I 3280 33RD AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I I I I I JOHNSON, WALFI M & ELMA I I JOLLY, CANDICE M 1 I } JONES, ALBERTE FRANCOIS %JULIE WILSON NEIL P ELLIOTT 2077 FAIRMONT LN I 227 BROOKSIDE BLVD I 2560 OIL WELL RD NAPLES, FL 34120---0 ; HINCKLEY, OH 44233 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i I I I JONES, BRETT B JORAWAR-BHIMSEN, URMILLA JORGE, AMAURY FERNANDEZ I 2023 PARSON ST 226 BURNS ST 2007 SAGEBRUSH CIR NAPLES, FL 34120 -0 j SOMERSET, NJ 08873---0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4569 Packet Pg. 932 9.A.4.c JOSE & JUANITA PINEDA R/TRUST 3585 33RD AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i I I JOSEPH, BOBBY i I 2595 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 456 I I I I JOSEPH, HERCULE CELANNE DORISCAR JOSEPH 2920 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I JOYCE A CULVER REVOCABLE TRUST 2837 LAKE BALDWIN LN #A402 ORLANDO, FL 32814 --- 0 1, JUREK, NATALIE BLANCO STEPHEN RJUREK 2890 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 KAJY; KENT 8495 LAUREL LAKES COVE NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 KANTAINIS, CHRISTIAN JENNIFER LGUSTAFSON 2915 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1490 KAUSLAND, SNORRE & JULIE 2117 SATSUMA LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I KEHL, TAYLOR MATTHEW ANN L KEATON 2118 HAMLIN ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 KELLY, KAREN RITA 2173 CLEMENTINE ST NAPLES, FL 34120--- 5327 I I JOSE, PONCIANO VENTURA 2331 DELLA DR NAPLES, FL 34120---0 JOSEPH, CYRIAC & SANY 5209 HARVEST HILL DR JAMESVILLE, NY 13078 --- 0 JOSEPH, OLANDIEU & LUMANE 2082 SAGEBRUSH CIR NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4568 JULIAN, CLIFFORD A 2930 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120--- 2819 JUSTE, BERNADE B 3530 33RD AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 2815 KALATHAKIS, IOANNIS & ROSICLER 1975 FAIRMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 KAPLAN, SCOTT & LINDSAY 2366 HEYDON CIR E NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 KAZIMIROFF, THEODORE ALANA DELUCA 2133 CLEMENTINE ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 KEIDEL, WAYNEA 1509 GUNDERSON AVE BERWYN, IL 60402--- 1316 KELLY, PANSY ANN WINSTON HALSTEAD 2260 DANCY ST NAPLES, FL 34120---0 JOSEPH & MARY PRUSH TRUST 665 VINTAGE RESERVE CIR #9C NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 JOSEPH, CYRIAC & SANY 5209 HARVEST HILL DR JAMESVILLE, NY 13078 --- 0 JOSEPH, PAULEUS & ROSEMANE 3665 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 JUNE D LONG FAMILY TRUST PO BOX 3216 JACKSON, WY 83001 --- 0 K&M RIVENBURG REV TRUST 3199 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 KANDATHIL, BIJU A & DOLLY B 573 COMSTOCK AVE ELMHURST, IL 60126 --- 0 KATOUCHIS, JOHN 2899 31ST AVE N E NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 KEELING, JOANNE 1940 WELLINGTON ST NAPLES, FL 34120--- 5330 KELLMAN, ELISE 0 WILCY 0 BRATHWAITE 2975 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 KEMM, CHRISTOPHER E 2685 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7409 Packet Pg. 933 9.A.4.c KEN AND LIA FRY LIVING TRUST KENNEDY, JOSEPH E I KENNEDY, MICHELLE AILEEN 5247 FERRARI AVE 85PARK AVE 2535 41ST AVE NE AVE MARIA, FL 34142--- 9541 ROCHESTER, NY 14607---0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I I KENTY, OLESYA NIKOLAEVNA I i KEPPLE, JESSICA FIGUEROA KERINS, WILLIAM L 2103 HAMLIN ST 3697 35TH AVE NE KATHLEEN ANNE KERINS NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 1964 PARSON ST i i � i I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 KERLUS, PRUDISE I I KHAN, KHAIRULLA & FREEZA KIBRIA FAMILY TRUST 3323 35TH AVE NE I 6525 UTOPIA PKWY j 5741 GOLDEN OAKS LN NAPLES, FL 34120---0 I FRESH MEADOWS, NY 11365 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34119---1219 KIDD, LINDA M r J l_ KIEFER JR, ALLAN E & LISA K KIRK, WESLEY A & SHELLEY W 36 LOWER LANE 2510 41ST AVE NE l I 2057 MANDARIN LN BERLIN, CT 06037 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 2836 I NAPLES, FL 34120---0 KIRKLEY, MINDY 1 KIRKPATRICK, NELDA &JAMES KIRNON, ANNA LOUISE 2129 FAIRMONT LN KELLY SUE & GEORGE RAY MARTIN I ANTOINE ALDRIC KIRNON NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4576 2196 DANCY ST 2685 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 5618 I NAPLES, FL 34120---0 KISH, CHAD &TANYA KISS JR, S FRANK l KISSEL, IAN MITCHELL 2505 41ST AVE NE 13808 VIA ALTO CT I NATALIE JANE RHOADS NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 SARATOGA, CA 95070--- 5259 i 2102 SATSUMA LANE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 KLASS, RICHARD KLEIN, LILA KLLB AIV LLC 8 STONEHENGE LN JOSETRINIDAD 111 S WEST 33RD ST STE 1910 EAST NORTHPORT, NY 11731--- 4520 1931 NE 188TH ST NEW YORK, NY 10120---0 MIAMI, FL 33179 --- 0 t KLLB AIV LLC KLLB AIV LLC KLLB AIV LLC 111 S WEST 33RD ST STE 1910 111 S WEST 33RD ST STE 1910 111 S WEST 33RD ST STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC KLLB AIV LLC ( KLLB AIV LLC 111 S WEST 33RD ST STE 1910 111 S WEST 33RD ST STE 1910 I I Ill SWEST 33RDSTSTE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC r KLLB AIV LLC I I KLLB AIV LLC 111 S WEST 33RD ST STE 1910 I ! 111 S WEST 33RD ST STE 1910 I 111 S WEST 33RD ST STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120---0 II NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 ! , ' NEW YORK, NY 10120---0 Packet Pg. 934 9.A.4.c KLLB AIV LLC KLLB AIV LLC KLLB AIV LLC 111 S WEST 33RD ST STE 1910 111 S WEST 33RD ST STE 1910 i 1115 WEST 33RD ST STE 1910 s NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 7 KLLB AIV LLC KLLB AIV LLC KLLB AIV LLC 1115 WEST 33RD ST STE 1910 I I 111 S WEST 33RD ST STE 1910 i 111 S WEST 33RD ST STE 1910 s NEW YORK, NY 10120--0 I NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 I NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 = KLLB AIV LLC KLLB AIV LLC 1 I KLLB AIV LLC 111 S WEST 33RD ST STE 1910 I 111 S WEST 33RD ST STE 1910 I 111 S WEST 33RD ST STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120---0 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 I I NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 u KLLB AIV LLC KLLB AIV LLC KLLB AIV LLC 1115 WEST 33RD ST STE 1910 111 S WEST 33RD ST STE 1910 ` 111 S WEST 33RD ST STE 1910 NEWYORK, NY 10120---0 NEW YORK, NY 10120---0 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 c l C KLLB AIV LLC KLLB AIV LLC KLLB AIV LLC c C 111 S WEST 33RD ST STE 1910 111 S WEST 33RD ST STE 1910 111 S WEST 33RD ST STE 1910 c NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 NEW YORK, NY 10120---0 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 p c u a r c KLLB AIV LLC KLLB AIV LLC KLLB AIV LLC 111 S WEST 33RD ST STE 1910 111 S WEST 33RD ST STE 1910 1115 WEST 33RD ST STE 1910 s NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 s p KLLB AIV LLC KLLB AIV LLC KLLB AIV LLC c Ill SWEST 33RDSTSTE 1910 Ill SWEST 33RDSTSTE 1910 Ill SWEST 33RDSTSTE 1910 c c NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 C c c o KLLB AIV LLC _ KLLB AIV LLC KLLB AIV LLC 111 S WEST 33RD ST STE 1910 111 S WEST 33RD ST STE 1910 111 S WEST 33RD ST STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 i i NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 < e I p � j C KLLB AIV LLC KLLB AIV LLC f KLLB AIV LLC C 111 S WEST 33RD ST STE 1910 111 S WEST 33RD ST STE 1910 I 1115 WEST 33RD ST STE 1910 p NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 I I NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 +. s s I u 1 KLLB AIV LLC _ KLLB AIV LLC I I y KLLB AIV LLC 111 S WEST 33RD ST STE 1910 I I 111 S WEST 33RD ST STE 1910 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 i NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 I NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 y ' 1 � i Packet Pg. 935 9.A.4.c KLLB AIV LLC 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC Ill SWEST 33RDST,STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC Ill S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120---0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC Ill WEST 33RDST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120---0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC 1115 WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC Ill S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120---0 KLLB AIV LLC Ill S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120---0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC Ill S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120---0 KLLB AIV LLC Ill SWEST 33RDST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120---0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC 1115 WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 Packet Pg. 936 9.A.4.c KLLB AIV LLC KLLB AIV LLC KLLB AIV LLC Ill S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 ! 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 . I NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 NEW YORK, NY 10120---0 KLLB AIV LLC KLLB AIV LLC KLLB AIV LLC 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 I f 1115 WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 0 I i I! I NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 j NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 � ! ! I KLLB AIV LLC i I I KLLB AIV LLC I I I KLLB AIV LLC 1115 WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 I i 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 i 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 I NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 I NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC KLLB AIV LLC KLLB AIV LLC ' 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 11l S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120---0 NEW YORK, NY 10120---0 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC I KLLB AIV LLC I KLLB AIV LLC 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 Ill S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC KLLB AIV LLC ( KLLB AIV LLC Ill S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 I 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 I NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC l KLLB AIV LLC KLLB AIV LLC 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 I ill S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 Ill S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 I NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 I NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 I KLLB AIV LLC 1 KLLB AIV LLC _ ( KLLB AIV LLC 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120---0 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 I NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 I I KLLB AIV LLC ( I KLLB AIV LLC KLLB AIV LLC I 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 I Ill S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 I I Ill S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 I I NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 I I NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC KLLB AIV LLC j KLLB AIV LLC 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 l !I Ill S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 I I NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 NEW YORK, NY 10120---0 ! Packet Pg. 937 9.A.4.c KLLB AIV LLC 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC III SWEST 33RDST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120-'--0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC Ill SWEST 33RDST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120---0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC Ill SWEST 33RDST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120---0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC Ill SWEST 33RDST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC Ill SWEST 33RDST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC 1115 WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC 1115 WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120---0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC Ill SWEST 33RDST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 Packet Pg. 938 9.A.4.c KLLB AIV LLC KLLB AIV LLC KLLB AIV LLC III SWEST 33RDST, STE 1910 Ill 5 WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 ! I 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 NEW YORK, NY 10120---0 i i I KLLB AIV LLC KLLB AIV LLC KLLB AIV LLC 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 I ! 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120---0 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 i � I i NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC I KLLB AIV LLC KLLB AIV LLC 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 I I I NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC I KLLB AIV LLC KLLB AIV LLC 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 I I 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120---0 I NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 i KLLB AIV LLC KLLB AIV LLC KLLB AIV LLC 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 I 111 S WEST 33RD 5T, STE 1910 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 ` NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 i 1 KLLB AIV LLC KLLB AIV LLC KLLB AIV LLC , 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 1115 WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC KLLB AIV LLC l KLLB AIV LLC I 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 I 1115 WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 1115 WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 i NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 i KLLB AIV LLC ( KLLB AIV LLC I KLLB AIV LLC 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 I I 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 NEW YORK, NY 10120---0 I NEW YORK, NY 10120---0 1�I 1 KLLB AIV LLC KLLB AIV LLC ((( KLLB AIV LLC 1115 WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 I 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 0 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 I i I �I NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC KLLB AIV LLC I KLLB AIV LLC Ill S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 j I 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 I i Ill S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 NEW YORK, NY 10120---0 ! NEW YORK, NY 10120- -0 Packet Pg. 939 9.A.4.c KLLB AIV LLC KLLB AIV LLC KLLB AIV LLC 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 ! 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 1 KLLB AIV LLC ! KLLB AIV LLC � KLLB AIV LLC 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 j 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 I I NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 I i NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 I� KLLB AIV LLC li KLLB AIV LLC I KLLB AIV LLC 1 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 I 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 I NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC l KLLB AIV LLC l KLLB AIV LLC 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 I 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 �I KLLB AIV LLC KLLB AIV LLC 1 KLLB AIV LLC 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 Ill SWEST 33RDST, STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 J KLLB AIV LLC KLLB AIV LLC 1, KLLB AIV LLC 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 111 S WEST 33RD ST, STE 1910 111 SWEST 33RD ST STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC KLLB AIV LLC KLLB AIV LLC 111 SWEST 33RD ST STE 1910 111 SWEST 33RD ST STE 1910 I 111 SWEST 33RD ST STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC KLLB AIV LLC ( KLLB AIV LLC 111 SWEST 33RD ST STE 1910 111 SWEST 33RD ST STE 1910 I 111 SWEST 33RD ST STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120---0 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC KLLB AIV LLC KLLB AIV LLC 111 SWEST 33RD ST STE 1910 I 111 SWEST 33RD ST STE 1910 I 111 SWEST 33RD ST STE 1910 I NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC KLLB AIV LLC KLLB AIV LLC 111 SWEST 33RD ST STE 1910 111 SWEST 33RD ST STE 1910 ! 111 SWEST 33RD ST STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 I I NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 � I Packet Pg. 940 9.A.4.c KLLB AIV LLC 111 SWEST 33RD ST STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 SWEST 33RD ST STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 SWEST 33RD ST STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120---0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 SWEST 33RD ST STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 SWEST 33RD ST STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 SWEST 33RD ST STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120---0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 SWEST 33RD ST STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 SWEST 33RD ST STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 SWEST 33RD ST STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 SWEST 33RD ST STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 SWEST 33RD ST STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 SWEST 33RD ST STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 SWEST 33RD ST STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 SWEST 33RD ST STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 SWEST 33RD ST STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 SWEST 33RD ST STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 SWEST 33RD ST STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 SWEST 33RD ST STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 SWEST 33RD ST STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 SWEST 33RD ST STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 SWEST 33RD ST STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AN LLC 111 SWEST 33RD ST STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 SWEST 33RD ST STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 SWEST 33RD ST STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 SWEST 33RD ST STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 SWEST 33RD ST STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 SWEST 33RD ST STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 SWEST 33RD ST STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 SWEST 33RD ST STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC 111 SWEST 33RD ST STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 Packet Pg. 941 9.A.4.c KLLB AIV LLC KLLB AIV LLC KLLB AIV LLC 111 SWEST 33RD ST STE 1910 111 SWEST 33RD ST STE 1910 111 SWEST 33RD ST STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 NEW YORK, NY 10120---0 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC KLLB AIV LLC KLLB AIV LLC 111 SWEST 33RD ST STE 1910 111 SWEST 33RD ST STE 1910 111 SWEST 33RD ST STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 i i I NEW YORK, NY 10120---0 KLLB AIV LLC it {I I KLLB AIV LLC KLLB AIV LLC 111 SWEST 33RD ST STE 1910 I 111 SWEST 33RD ST STE 1910 i 111 SWEST 33RD ST STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 I I NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 I I 1 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC 1 KLLB AIV LLC KLLB AIV LLC 111 SWEST 33RD ST STE 1910 f ( 111 SWEST 33RD ST STE 1910 I 111 SWEST 33RD ST STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120---0 I NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 I NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 KLLB AIV LLC l� KLLB AIV LLC KLLB AIV LLC 111 SWEST 33RD ST STE 1910 I 111 SWEST 33RD ST STE 1910 ' 111 SWEST 33RD ST STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 NEW YORK, NY 10120-- 0 KLLB AIV LLC I \ KLLB AIV LLC KLLB AIV LLC 111 SWEST 33RD ST STE 1910 111 SWEST 33RD ST STE 1910 111 SWEST 33RD ST STE 1910 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 NEW YORK, NY 10120---0 KLLB AIV LLC I ! KLOMAN, MARGARET VIRGINIA I KLOTZ, APRIL DAWN 111 SWEST 33RD ST STE 1910 FRANK TROPFENBAUM I 2632 29TH AVE NE NEW YORK, NY 10120 --- 0 2106 CLEMENTINE STREET i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 KLYCZEK, WALTER & NANCY I KNUTSON, PETER R & BROOKE M KOBLEUR JR, RICHARD & MARIA 12425 BARONE DR 1996 PARSON ST I ! 3545 29TH AVE NE SILVER CREEK, NY 14136--- 1203 I I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 2822 KOELSCH, LINDA I ( KONCZ, ALBERT A & BABETT KISS KONG, GENE CHIN JAUW 7506 W 5 MILE RD # A I 1990 FAIRMONT LN I 2390 39TH AVE NE FRANKSVILLE, WI 53126--- 9655 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4571 I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7557 KOOPMAN, GEORGE MICHAEL I I KOSCICA, MILOS I KOSZEWNIK, MICHAELJ & LINDAJ VICKI LYNN KOOPMAN 2267 DANCY ST I 2023 SAGEBRUSH CIR 2880 RANDALL BLVD I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 5638 ? I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4569 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I Packet Pg. 942 9.A.4.c KOWALSKI EST, MILDRED A KOZAWICK, DANIELJOSEPH KRAMER, ELWANDA H % PATRICIA E 1AHASKE SHIRLEY ALENNIE KOZAWICK : 93 KUNZE DR 1611 CAMBERLEY CT UNIT 4 2234 VERMONT LN SAINT CHARLES, MO 63303- 5927 BARTLETT, IL 60103 --- 747 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 KRAUSS, MATTHEW W & KRISTIN J KRAUSS, ROBERT & ROSEMARY i KRINCE LIVING TRUST 2095 SAGEBRUSH CIR I 2462 HEYDON CIR E I LINDA M KRINCETR NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 l I NAPLES, FL 34120 -0 7137 ERIE DR f i MENTOR, OH 44060--- 5147 , i I KRONZ, JONATHAN CHRISTOPHER I KRUEGER, LAMES A I KUNTZ, JOHN E & MARY A 322433RD AVE NE 120 N HOWARD RD 260 WESTBROOK DR NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I CURTICE, OH 43412 --- 0 I TOMS RIVER, NJ 08757--- 5640 i i L KUPSTAS, PATRICIA & DAVID KURTH, AARON & ANJULEE 1 I KURTI, ENDRIT & IRINA s 2274 VERMONT LN 2865 RANDALL BLVD I ! 2326 HEYDON CIR W NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4586 c c c KYAN, CHWAN P L CONSTRUCTION LLC LA ESPERIA DAVEY LLC C c DARLENE E CARPENTER 3594 29TH AVE NE 4991 BONITA BAY BLVD #1401 c 2105 SATSUMA LANE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134---0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 u c r c LACK OF PREFERENCE LIV TRUST _ LADD, SUSAN M ( LAGO, PAUEL & YUGLIS 2200 VERMONT LANE 2251 VERMONT LN 3293 RANDALL BLVD c NAPLES, FL 34120---0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 • i C LAKE, JAMES E & GAIL G ( LAKHANI, MEHB00B LAM TR, IVONNE A 2038 MINNEOLA STREET 14760 ASHLAND PL MERCEDES M LAM C NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 DAVIE, FL 33325--- 6325 5406 SW 128TH PL c MIAMI, FL 33175--- 6241 c C J LAMORTE, FRANCIS & CAMILA LANAHAN REVOCABLE TRUST LANIOUS, KATHERINE ; 2079 SAGEBRUSH CIR I 2238 HEYDON CIR W TODD P SHELBAUGH ! NAPLES, FL 34120 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4584 2105 FAIRMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4576 C LAOHOO, EMERSON W & GABRIELLA j LAPORTE, SARA EMILY & KEVIN J I LARA, ARMANDO J CASTILLO 2283 DANCY ST 3165 37TH AVE NE I I SILVIA LARA GALVAN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1775 2535 37TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 j �I L LARIOS, EDUARDO A _ _ LAROSE, GRANTT & SHEILA M LARSON, MORGAN MICHELE y GALINA YUDINOVA I 3295 29TH AVE NE I BRANDON JEFFRIES 2513 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 1882 ALAMEDA DR NAPLES, FL 34120---0 I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 a y i i Packet Pg. 943 9.A.4.c LARUSSO, GIOVANNI LAURA L BOWLING REV TRUST LAURORE, SANDY r MAY -LING ENEDINA AGUILERA 2820 RANDALL BLVD 2680 31ST AVE NE 3 356027TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 2921 E NAPLES, FL 34120---D � 0 U c,> LAWRENCE TR, L C . LD NAPLES TRUCKING INC LEAL, JUSTIN JAVIER L 3870 25TH AVE SW l j 531 13TH ST NW l CHELSEA BEASLEY V NAPLES, FL 34117--- 7130 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 j I 2885 37TH AVE NE _ NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ,II it � � J LEBON, FRITZ P l i LEBRON, JOSE E LEDESMA, BEATRIZ HERNANDEZ 3345 35TH AVE NE I 2200 DANCY ST I 1 ORLANDO CAMEJO CARMONA = NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 1 I 2912 29TH AVE NE E NAPLES, FL 34120---0 E W a LEE, GARY W LEHMAN, DAVID JOHN & MARY ANN l r LEINWEBER, ARNAUD W 20082 US HIGHWAY 81 2358 HEYDON CIR E I 3496 27TH AVE NE U ARLINGTON, SD 57212--- 5015 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34120 -0 c N N O LEITH, ROGER D & SUE E LEJA, ADAM 1 LENERTZ, JEFFREY & BRITTANY N 3720 31ST AVE NE 3340 35TH AVE NE 2063 SAGEBRUSH CIR a NAPLES, FL 34120---417 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 .. O Lo co I 1 N LENNAR HOMES LLC LENNAR HOMES LLC LENNAR HOMES LLC N 10481 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY 10481 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY 10481 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY C FORT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 FORT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 FORT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 N LENNAR HOMES LLC LENNAR HOMES LLC LENNAR HOMES LLC N 10481 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY I I 10481 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY 10481 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY o FORT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 I FORT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 FORT MYERS, FL 33966---0 G N I N J a LENNAR HOMES LLC LENNAR HOMES LLC r LENNAR HOMES LLC N I ( 10481 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY 10481 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY 10481 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY a I FORT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 I FORT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 FORT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 V a I l i _ LENNAR HOMES LLC LENNAR HOMES LLC ( LENNAR HOMES LLC V 10481 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY 10481 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY I 10481 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY m FORT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 I I FORT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 FORT MYERS, FL 33966---0 i � s I I � W LENNAR HOMES LLC LENNAR HOMES LLC LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY i 10481 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY 10481 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY i FORT MYERS, FL 33966 0 FORT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 FORT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 a Packet Pg. 944 9.A.4.c LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY FORT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY FORT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY FORT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY FORT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY FORT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY FORT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY FORT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY FORT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY FORT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY FORT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY FORT MYERS, FL 33966---0 LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY FORT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY FORT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY FORT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY FORT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY FORT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY FORT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY FORT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY FORT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY FORT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY FORT MYERS, FL 33966---0 LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY FORT MYERS, FL 33966---0 LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY FORT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY FORT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY FORT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY FORT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY FORT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY FORT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY FORT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY FORT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 Packet Pg. 9 57 9.A.4.c i LENNAR HOMES LLC LENNAR HOMES LLC LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY 10481 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY 10481 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY FORT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 FORT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 FORT MYERS, FL 33966---0 LENNAR HOMES LLC I LENNAR HOMES LLC LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY � 10481 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY , i 10481 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY FORT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 i FORT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 i i � I i FORT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 LENNAR HOMES LLC LENNAR HOMES LLC LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY I I 10481 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY i 10481 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY FORT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 I I FORT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 FORT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 LENNAR HOMES LLC l LENNAR HOMES LLC i LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY I I 10481 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY 10481 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY FORT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 FORT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 FORT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 LENNAR HOMES LLC I LENNAR HOMES LLC LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY 10481 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY I 10481 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY FORT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 FORT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 FORT MYERS, FL 33966---0 LENNAR HOMES LLC i i LENNAR HOMES LLC l LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY 10481 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY I 10481 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY FORT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 FORT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 FORT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 LENNAR HOMES LLC II LENNAR HOMES LLC I LEODAN LLC 10481 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY 10481 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY S91 SEAVIEW CT #402 FORT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 FORT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 MARCO ISLAND, FL 34145 --- 0 �l LEON, ADIENE FACENDA LESLIE, BRIAN & NATALIA LEVINE, SCOTT LAWRENCE 2854 39TH AVE NE ( 2322 31ST AVE NE I DIANE PATRICIA LEVINE NAPLES FL 34120---0 I NAPLES, FL 34111 --- 0 2276 DANCY ST I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 LEWIS & CLARK EXPEDITION LLC LEZCANO, TERESA LIANI M REYNA TRUST 8473 BAY COLONY DR APT 502 I I ANA MARIA LEZCANO I 2282 VERMONT LANE NAPLES, FL 34108 --- 710 MADELIN LEZCANO NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 3140 S OCEAN DR APT 1108 HALLANDALE BEACH, FL 33009--7238 i LIGONDE, MARIE L LIMA, LAZARO HERNANDEZ I I LIN, SAGE 2824 29TH AVE NE i 2433 RANDALL BLVD I I LINH DO NAPLES, FL 34120 - 0 i NAPLES, FL 34120---0 18 FOX HILL DR I. WARREN, NJ 07059---0 Packet Pg. 946 9.A.4.c LINARES, CRISALIDA LINDLEY II, STUART DEAN i LINDOR, FRANTZ STEVENSON JOHAN RAFAEL GARTEROI PARRA 2990 39TH AVE NE 2926 31ST AVE NE 2756 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I, LINDSEY, MIRACLE LINK, CHRISTOPHER & KATHERINE LIPOVSKY, THOMAS WAYNE ANTHONY CADET ! 10209 SOUTH GOLDEN ELM DR JUDITH ANN LIPOVSKY I 2930 35TH AVE NE ESTERO, FL 33928 --- 0 I i 2135 VERMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 0 I i NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4562 LIPPE 11, STEPHEN B LIRA ET UX, ANTONIO U 1 LITTAU ET UX, WM MELANIE LYNN LIPPE I 1952 PROVINCIAL LN ( 1205 W 26TH ST S 2398 HEYDON CIRCLE E FT MITCHELL, KY 41011--- 1816 I 1 INDEPENDENCE, MO 64052---3215 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I j� LJBR LLC 1 LLANES, LISET ALFONSO LLOYD, RANDALL S I 12691 AAVIANO DR I 2440 27TH AVE NE 3420 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34105 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34120---0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1586 I LOCHEN, JEREMY D LOCKE, MICHAEL P 1 I LOGUE, PATRICK JOSEPH i 2495 39TH AVE NE 3685 27TH AVE NE ERIN EILEEN LOGUE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1533 2394 ORCHARD ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 LONG, ANTONIO LONG, STEPHEN H & PATRICIA E LOPEZ, FRANCISCO R NADIAH YUSUF 20801 WATERBEACH PL OSARYS SANTOS 2195 DANCY ST POTOMAC FALLS, VA 20165---0 3270 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120---2823 LOPEZ, GILBERTO & MARIA LOPEZ, ILAN RODRIGUEZ 11049 SW 3RD ST ARIAGNA CORDERO ORTIZ I MIAMI, FL 33174--- 1219 I 3274 31ST AVE NE I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 LOPEZ, JUAN M & NYDIA LOPEZ, LAZARD JULI0 2715 RANDALL BLVD I IDARMIS GARCIA NAPLES, FL 34120--- 5593 3310 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120---0 l LOPEZ, LUIS A &JENNIFER GLYNN + LOPEZ, LUIS FRANCISCO BARRERA 2696 29TH AVE NE I 1912 WELLINGTON ST NAPLES, FL 34120 - 0 I i I NAPLES, FL 34120-0 I 1 1 LOPEZ, MIRIAM I I LOPEZ, PEDRO A & CONSUELO A 2870 EVERGLADES BLVD N 3160 41ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 2806 I I I i NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3273 i I j LOPEZ, JUAN FRANCISCO I ISRAEL PACHECO 570 NW 123 AVE MIAMI, FL 33182 --- 0 LOPEZ, LEOPOLDO 2097 SATSUMA LANE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 LOPEZ, MARLON CASTRO KAILIN AYALA ARMERO l 3025 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 II I 4 LOPEZ, WILFREDO MARLEN CARTAYA 2131 VERMONT LN I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i Packet Pg. 947 9.A.4.c LORENZ, JONATHAN LORENZ, MONICA A C MELENDEZ 2116 PARSON STREET NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I II LORIGA, NELVYS DUQUE 3725 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 j LOVELOCK, CRAIG R TEMIKA N LOVELOCK 4341 SW 18TH ST WEST PARK, FL 33023--- 3407 LUBARS, MICHELLE M 291124TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 LUCID, JUAN MORENO KATERINE MORENO 1862 ALAMEDA DR NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 LUSK III, HAL H & CRYSTAL G 2810 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1880 LYNCH JR, EDWIN M 3210 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3229 LYNCH, TIMOTHY R & DIANE S 2795 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1881 LYNN & ESTHER WILSON REV TRUST 4925•E BENNINGTON RD DURAND, MI 48429--- 1086 M W & P L STAHL REVOC TRUST 752 GRAND RAPIDS BLVD I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i LORETTA, SALVATORE THOMAS BRIANNA MARIE LORETTA 8677 ADDISON PLACE CIR UNIT 315 NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 LORRAINE V MCKAY REV TRUST GEORGE W MCKAY REV TRUST I 3730 14TH ST N NAPLES, FL 34103 --- 0 II � LOYNES, MATTHEW JOHN LAUREN SUZANNE CROWDER 2019 SAGEBRUSH CIR NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I LUBIN, RICOT SUZE BIEN-AIME I 2920 41ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I LUGO, THOMAS LOUIS & AMANDA 2263 VERMONT LANE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I LUTHER, GEORGE E & SUSAN JOY I 2820 37TH AVE NE I NAPLES, FL 34120--7431 LYNCH, ANDRE 4560 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116 --- 0 LYNCH, TIMOTHY R & DIANE S i 2795 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1881 J M & P TORO REV JOINT TRUST 18581 SW 7TH ST PEMBROKE PINES, FL 33029--- 6002 M&M LAND TRUST 8260 SW 182ND ST I PALMETTO BAY, FL 33157--- 6134 I LORI JEAN DIMMICK LIV TRUST 3360 CAYMAN LANE NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 LOUIS, KERRY 2456 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 LOZANO, JAIME ANDRES 1165 EVERGLADES BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 LUCID, GABRIEL SANTOS LUCID PO BOX 653033 MIAMI, FL 33265--- 3033 LUNA, TOMAS 1924TIMBERLINE LN SHERMAN, TX 75092 --- 0 LYLES, DEBORAH J MICHAEL A LYLES 3660 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 LYNCH, ANDRE 4560 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116 --- 0 LYNCH, TIMOTHY R & DIANE S 2795 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1881 M W & P L STAHL REVOC TRUST 752 GRAND RAPIDS BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MAB & J INVESTMENTS LLC 11439 SW 133RD TERR MIAMI, FL 33176 --- 0 Packet Pg. 948 9.A.4.c MACARTHUR, JAMES ERIC MACDONALD, PATRICIA E MACIAS, JOSE M & MYRA LAURIE ANGELA MACARTHUR KEITH C MACDONALD 2435 29TH AVE NE 2336 ORCHARD ST 456 BEACH 126TH ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ROCKAWAY PARK, NY 11694 --- 0 MACIER, JERRY D MACKENZIE, JAMIE LYNN i MADERA, IRAN MUNOZ 2495 31ST AVE NE 2198 CLEMENTINE ST I MAYULI OTERO MEDINA NAPLES, FL 34120--- 2929 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 5326 i 2880 29TH AVE N E I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MADRIGAL, HECTOR MANUEL MAESTRI, KIMBERLY E & MARIANO i MAGDALENO, ADRIAN & MARIBEL JANNIS MADRIGAL 2189 FAIRMONT LN I I 2631 EVERGLADES BLVD N 2825 29TH AVE NE I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1527 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 j� MAGDALENO, ADRIAN & MARIBEL MAGEE, JAMES & YAHAIRA I MAGLOIRE, MCPHERSON V 2631 EVERGLADES BLVD N 2830 RANDALL BLVD i 1900 WELLINGTON ST NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1527 NAPLES, FL 34120---3576 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MAGUR, GEORGE P I MAKRAM, CHERIF & MERVAT j MALAGA, JOSE L & PATRICIA L MARILYN A MAGUR I PO BOX 757 2930 27TH AVE NE EDWARD G MAGUR I ROCK HILL, NY 12775 --- 757 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ANN MARIE MAGUR 16 VISTAVIEW LN #119 ENDWELL, NY 13760 --- 0 J MAMMADOV, PASHA MANGIALARDI, SHAYNA & BRIANA MANKINS, DEREK 1301 JONAS AVE 2221 CARA WAY i 3490 29TH AVE NE SACRAMENTO, CA 95864---0 NAPLES, FL 34102---0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1586 MARAGH, RAMA N & LOUISE L MARC & CYNTHIA CHAVANNE TRUST MARENCO, MAN UEL S & SHELBY E 7451 SW 132ND AVE 2317 FEATHER BROOK LN I 2636 41ST AVE NE MIAMI, FL 33183--- 3469 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 � MARGARET I LOMANDO LIV TRUST I I MARIA ROCIO MORA REV TRUST MARIA, MICHAEL EUGENE 34617 HEAVENLY LN 1460 39TH ST SW GINA M MARIA DADE CITY, FL 33525 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34117 --- 0 2046 MINNEOLA ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MARIAN ZULLO REVOCABLE TRUST ( MARIN, PABLO DARIO MARIN, PABLO DARIO 2030 FAIRMONT LN I I GLORIA ELENA MARIN I GLORIA ELENA MARIN NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4573 I 8204 N 2 105 AVE I 8204 N W 105 AVE I I i � TAMARAC, FL 33321 --- 0 I i I TAMARAC, FL 33321---0 MARKLEY, SCOTT M &JENNIFER C MARQUEZ, MARGARITA MARRA, GIUSEPPE 2227 DANCY ST i ANDRES FELIPE CASTRO DUSSAN AMBERLY NICOLE MARRA NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i 2124 PARSON ST 2223 DANCY ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 Packet Pg. 949 9.A.4.c MARRERO, DAYAN & AREIDA MARRERO, LEONARDO & LIDIA MARTIN, DANIELLE &JORDAN 2140 42ND ST SW 3045 OIL WELL RD 2062 MINNEOLA ST NAPLES, FL 34116 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 f MARTIN, KENNETH MARTINEZ ACOSTA, ANGELICA i MARTINEZ EST, NELSON ROSHMI MISHRA KARLA LLANAS MARTINEZ i 2840 39TH AVE NE 2374 ORCHARD ST I 3421 RANDALL BLVD I j NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i I MARTINEZ MORENO, ARNALDO MARTINEZ, ANTONIA MARTINEZ, ANTONIO BARBARITA VALDES SANTOVENIA I 3240 41ST AVE NE j 2835 31ST AVE NE 3290 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120 -1501 i NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4541 NAPLES, FL 34120---0 f I MARTINEZ, ASHLEY MARTINEZ, BASILIO R & DIGNORA I MARTINEZ, BASILIO R & DIGNORA 28060 DOVEWOOD CT APT 105 3520 E 9TH CT 3520 E 9TH CT BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135 --- 821 HIALEAH, FL 33013--- 3118 HIALEAH, FL 33013--- 3118 MARTINEZ, CARLOS MARTINEZ, CARLOS } ( MARTINEZ, ELIGIO & YULIET 4679 EVERGLADES BLVD NE 4679 EVERGLADES BLVD NE I 2580 37TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1549 I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7436 I MARTINEZ, JESUS IGNACIO MARTINEZ, JORGE L l ! MARTINEZ, JORGE M 70 ISLE OF STTHOMAS 3125 52ND ST SW DAYRON J MARTINEZ NAPLES, FL 34114 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34116---8125 3225 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MARTINEZ, LIDIA L MARTINEZ, LUIS FERNANDO MARTINEZ, MAYRA & ANDRES D 2385 39TH AVE NE SANDRA ANGEL 3100 NW 17TH ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 50 LAWN AVENUE #28 MIAMI, FL 33125---0 STAMFORD, CT 06902 --- 0 MARTINEZ, MILDER DELGADO MARTINEZ, REINALDO i MARTINEZ, RICARDO VIRGINIA CADETE LA 0 ( 2385 RANDALL BLVD 1929 WELLINGTON ST 3226 29TH AVE NE I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 5518 ! NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MARTINEZ, RUBEN & GLORIA MARTINEZ, WILLIAM I MARY RADOS REVOCABLE TRUST 3005 EVERGLADES BLVD N ! i 2616 27TH AVE NE I 555 18TH AVE S NAPLES, FL 34116 --- 0 �I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1483 NAPLES, FL 34102 --- 0 f MARZIGLIANO, MICHAEL C MASE, CARL & NANCY MASON, VERONICA DENISE ELISABETH MAYER MARZIGLIANO j 2045 FAIRMONT LN I MARLON FERNANDO MASON 2194 CLEMENTINE ST NAPLES, FL 34120---0 ( 2313 FEATHER BROOK LANE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 1 i Packet Pg. 950 9.A.4.c MASSEY, CAROL MASSEY, ROBERT & REBECCA MAST, ROBERT M & CAROLEE A 2322 WOODBRIDGE AVE i 2068 HAMLIN ST 2107 VERMONT LN EDISON, NJ 08817--- 5532 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MATA, JOSE REYES i MATAMOROS, MARCIO BLADIMIR MATHEW REVOCABLE TRUST 7369 NW 174TH TER APT 107 I 291129TH AVE NE I ! 830 8TH ST SE HIALEAH, FL 33015---0 I I ! NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34117 --- 0 MATHEW, JOHN i II MATHEW, LIZZAMMA & JENNIS MATCHEW H WORMS REV TRUST JACOBJOHN MATHEW I 8345 PHOENICIAN COURT I 124 9TH ST SE 82 CHESTNUT ST I DAVIE, FL 31311 --- 0 I FREEPORT, MN 11111 --- 0 LIVINGSTON, N1 07039--- 5502 I f MAY, LAWRENCE E ( MAYSONET, LUIS l ( MAZARIEGOS, T MAURICIO LUCAS 4405 MACNISH ST APT 2D I CHARLLOTTE DE LEON I 12 TRUMAN CIR ELMHURST, NY 11373--- 3690 2084 HAMLIN ST NAPLES, FL 34104---0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MAllELLA, FRANCIS CARL i MAZZOTTA, SEBASTAIN ( MC CRILLIS EST, GEORGE R DANIELA MARCELLA MAZZELLA JENNIFER MAZZOTTA % CHANTELLE MILLER 2115 VERMONT LANE 7005 ROMANA WAY #i1706 I 26465 COUNTY RD 74 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 l EATON, CO 80615 --- 0 _ MCCLURE, CHAD PATRICK _ MCDERMOTT, CAROLYN 0 MCDONALD, SHANE EMILY SUZANNE MCCLURE 1 VINTON DR 2795 31ST AVE NE 2151 VERMONT LANE PENACOOK, NH 03303 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120---4477 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MCEWING, DAVID MCFADDEN, NICHOLASJOSEPH MCGEE, MAGGIE ( 2073 FAIRMONT LN I MELANIE ANNE MCFADDEN l 2465 HEYDON CIR E NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 2378 HEYDON CIRCLE E NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 iI NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ( MCGILL, SEAN CHRISTOPHER 1 _ MCGOWAN, ROBERT WILLIAM _ MCGUIRE, ROBERT 1 1870 ALAMEDA DR I MARIA ELENA MCGOWAN 3986 GRANT AVE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 3260 31ST AVE NE I HAMBURG, NY 14075--- 2923 i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I MCINTOSH-WINT, WINSOME D � MCKENZIE, HECTOR MCKEOWN SIMONSON, DENISE DONNOVAN WINT I MARCIA HANIFORD MCKENZIE ROBERT SIMONSON 2091 BUCKINGHAMSHIRE RD 4367 WICKHAM AVE 2514 27TH AVE NE ! FURLONG, PA 18925 --- 0 i BRONX, NY 10466 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MCLEAN, DANIEL MARTIN I MCMILLAN, MICHAEL & SANDRA MCMILLIN, BRITTANY WELLS SARAH KATHERINE MCLEAN ; 60006 COTTAGE MILL DR DARREN ROBERT MCMILLIN 2402 HEYDON CIRCLE E WASHINGTON, MI 48094 --- 0 I 1854 ALAMEDA DR NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 Packet Pg. 951 9.A.4.c MCMILLION, ALICE J MEANEY, KEVIN & DONNA MEDINA, MINELVIS SIMPSON MARVIN CHARLES MCMILLION 2320 27TH AVE NE RICARDO ENRIClUE SUAREZ CHAVEZ ARELYS MARIA MORTO NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAOMY SUAREZ SIMPSON 3270 RANDALL BLVD 2645 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 5595 i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MEDIA, RUBEN I MEKEEL, BRIGETTE A & PATRICK D MELLUL, LISA DIANA CRUZ i 1976 PARSON ST i 3020 RANDALL BLVD 3225 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 449 I I MELO, ELIZABETH & CARLOS I I i MELUCCI, MARIO MICHAEL I MENA, JOSE CASTRO 1859 ALAMEDA DR 3460 31ST AVE NE YOAIMA MIRANDA NARDO NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I ( NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I 3240 EVERGLADES BVLD N NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MENA, NOEMI MENDEZ RAMIREZ, KARLA M f MENDEZ, JUAN M 264124TH AVE NE I RAFAEL DE LA CRUZ I MARIA I RAMIREZ-SANTANA NAPLES, FL 34120---3570 2235 VERMONT LN I 2531 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7406 MENEIIAS, MARCELO MENENDEZ, BARBARA LIDIA MENENDEZ, LUIS MARICELA MENEJIAS LORENZO 10141 E BAY HARBOR DR #2C ELVIRA ROMERO 2460 35TH AVE NE BAY HARBOR ISLAN, FL 33154 --- 0 3290 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1403 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3229 MENENDEZ, PEDRO MERAN, CARLOS J MERCADO, MARCELO ISRAEL FERNANDEZ 3147 31ST AVE NE LILLIAN GUADALUPE 7005 SW 21STST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 3125 EVERGLADES BLVD N MIAMI, FL 33155 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1700 MERCER, JEFFERY S & AMY M I MERKOSKY, JENNIFER MERLYNSAN HOLDINGS INC 1997 SAGEBRUSH CIR WILLIAM PATRICK TREFZ 6145 JOHNSON ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I 1855 ALAMEDA DR HOLLYWOOD, FL 33024 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MERVEILLE, ELISABETH II i MERZEAU, GRACIELA MESA, MAYTEE & LENIEL ISABEL MARTHA DESLOUCHES I 3665 29TH AVE NE 1970 FAIRMONT LN 2645 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120--- 2834 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MESKE, DAVID B i MESKE, DEBBIE A & MICHAEL K MESSAM, MARLENE ANDRIA 2021 FAIRMONT LANE 1894 ALAMEDA DR i 2272 DANCY ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i ,I I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MESSINAJR, FRANK & SHERYLT MEZA, PEDRO I MGJ INVESTMENTS LLC 2004 SAGEBRUSH CIR 3845 41ST AVE NE 3022 2ND ST NW NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4568 I NAPLES, FL 34120---0 i I NAPLES, FL 34120---0 Packet Pg. 952 9.A.4.c MGJ INVESTMENTS LLC MIANO, KATHRYN MICHAELIS, PAOLA MENDEZ 3022 2ND ST SW 2820 41ST AVE NE 411 18TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 6309 I i ` MICHALSKI, DANIEL CHARLES MICHEL, CHARLINE MICOVIC, MIRJANA JOANNA AGNES MICHALSKI 3382 27TH AVE NE I 2209 CARA CARAWAY ANNA W PLUC NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 2139 VERMONT LANE i NAPLES, FL 34120---0 MIGLIACCIO, JOSEPH MILIAN, YOVANI QUIROS MILLER FAMILY TRUST ' CAROLYN PEREZ MIGLIACCIO I I 28SO 41ST AVE NE I I 2150 CLEMENTINE ST 2291 VERMONT LANE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34120--0 I ( I ( I, l MILLER, KEISHA MILLER, KURT C & USA t MILLER, MORGAN & RYAN 1959 FAIRMONT LN 2016 PARSON ST 2362 HEYDON CIR E j NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120---0 NAPLES, FL 14120--- 4578 t t MILO, BIANCA MINAYA, AYMEE � , MINNIS, LAURA E 1983 PARSON ST JAVIER 0 MILLAN I JANE KITSON NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I 2590 27TH AVE NE 2434 HEYDON CIRCLE EAST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i 1 1 l MIRAMAR SOLUTION GROUP INC MIRANDA, ANNABELLE M r" MIRANDA, CHARLES 3211 10TH AVE NE AGUSTIN MIRANDA 2460 37TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 256139TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120---0 MIRAVISTA DEV CORP MIRELES SERVICES LLC MISAS, ALBA M i 4099 TAMIAMI TRAIL N #403 1121 11TH ST SW 12862 SW 134TH ST i NAPLES, FL 34103 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34117 --- 0 MIAMI, FL 33186--- 4452 t I � MIXAN ET AL, JACOB D MOCK, ZACHERY A _ 1 MOLERO, CEDRIC ENRIQUE MUNOZ ROSEMARY H CHURCH 2480 29TH AVE NE YESSIKA PAULA GONZALEZ PENA CHARLES MIXAN NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7540 2204 DANCY ST ANTHONY MIXAN NAPLES, FL 34120---0 6050 SEWARD ST OMAHA, NE 68104 --- 0 MOLINA, ALEJANDRO MOLINA, AURORA MOLINA, OTTO DAVID AVEIGA 2910 27TH AVE NE 13737 SW 9TH TER I HEBERTO ARIAS BLANCO NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MIAMI, FL 33184--- 3014 2161 CLEMENTINE ST I I I NAPLES, FL 34120---0 1 MOLL, TAMMY L MOLLINEDO, NILDA i MONCRIEFFE, ANDRE S 2129 CLEMENTINE STREET I I 3340 41ST AVE NE TAMEKA L MONCRIEFFE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3210 2445 HEYDON CIR E NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ; Packet Pg. 953 9.A.4.c MONTALBAN, ANGEL MONTALBAN, ANGEL 3545 31ST AVE NE 3545 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4486 MONTALVO, DAVID & MARIA B I. MONTALVO, MARISOL 2827 EVERGLADES BLVD IN i t HENRY PEREZ NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1599 I I 2042 MANDARIN LN i NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4554 MONTEZ, MIGUEL A & ESMERALDA D MONTICELLI, CARL 2725 35TH AVE NE I CLAUDIA A MONTICELLI I i NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1768 i I 2078 PARSON ST I NAPLES, FL 34120---0 MONTOYA, RICARDO MONZON, ABIGAIL MARIE ANTONIO MONTOYA GAMBOA I ( LUIS GERARDO MONZON-MARTINEZ 2965 39TH AVE NE I 2720 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120---0 MOODY, ERIC DAVID MOOK, THEODORE FRANCIS & DANA NORMA AGNES MOODY I 2346 HEYDON CIR E 2404 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MOORE LIVING TRUST THE l MOORE, SCOTT 13 ROSEDALE APTS I 2099 VERMONT LN HERSHEY, PA 17033 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120---0 MORA, ARTURO MORALES MORA, DAVID LETICIA SANCHEZ I 2214 VERMONT LN 3964 EVERGLADES BLVD N I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ' MORAGA, LOSE A 4 MORALES, FRANCISCO CARMEN PEREIRA I ( 3523 27TH AVE NE I 3231 24TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I MORALES, RONALD A MORAN, LAZARO ALBERTO I 10101 SANDY HOLLOW LN #107 I ESSY ELIANET SANCHEZ I BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135--- 6697 DE LATORRE, RAUL=& BARBARA 2530 EVERGLADES BLVD N i NAPLES, FL 34120---0 , MORENO, CHRISTIAN I MORENO, HENRY JESSICA TARAP I ELLA MARIA K RIOS I I 2334 HEYDON CIR E 2005 FAIRMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4574 i MONTALBAN, ANGEL 3545 31ST NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MONTENEGRO, ORESTES CASAS 2370 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MONTOYA, PEDRO & ZENAIDA PO BOX 163321 MIAMI, FL 33116--- 3321 MONZON, JORGE 3332 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1777 MOONEY, ISOBEL H MOONEY WILLIAM E HANKINS E/O THOMAS H HANKINS 308 WILLRICH CIR UNIT E FOREST HILL, MD 21050--- 1362 MOORE, STEVEN ALLEN ALANE KAE MOORE 1963 FAIRMONT LANE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MORAGA, JOSE A CARMEN PEREIRA 323124TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MORALES, LUIS ALBERTO VAZQUEZ LUIS MIGUEL VAZQUEZ HERNANDEZ 2980 41ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MORAN, SANDRA GERALDO ORTIZ 2416 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MORENO, LEOSVEL MONTANO 2940 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 Packet Pg. 954 9.A.4.c MORENO, MARIO MORGAN, CARA SUSANNA MORGAN, JOSEPH M MARITZA MILAGROS MORENO NOAH JACOB MORGAN 2365 27TH AVE NE 2920 29TH AVE NE 2244 DANCY ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7459 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MORO OSVALDO VERDECIA MOROTTO TR, JOHN MORROW, CHRISTINA YAILEN SEGURA PENA j I GOLDEN GATE EST REALTY TRUST i 252124TH AVE NE 2968 41ST AVE NE I 122 LEXINGTON ST I I NAPLES, FL 34120 - 3555 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i WOBURN, MA 01801---0 i I I MORTON, JEANNETTE ANN I MOSKAL, ERIK LOUIS MOW INVESTMENTS LLC 2245 CARA CARA WAY SAMANTHA AMBER MOSKAL l I 3118TH ST NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 I 2633 27TH AVE NE I NAPLES, FL 34120 - 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 jI t I MOXLEY, JANET WALKER _ ( MUELLER, KENNETH MUINO, ALIEN ROY DARIN MICHAEL MOXLEY l I CHRISTINE KOWALSKI 3529 EVERGLADES BLVD N 2188 VERMONT LN 2034 FAIRMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120---0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120---0 I j MULENCIA HOLDINGS LLC MUNOZ, LINDA RACQUEL MUNOZ, RAFAEL 11509 CORONADO WAY 2031 PARSON ST 4102 TRENTON AVE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33026--- 4924 MUNRA PUBLIC ADJUSTERS INC MURRAY, RICHARD & MARIA I MUSE FAMILY TRUST 8215 N W 64TH ST STE 3 2841 24TH AVE NE 3736 ROBERT M GRISSOM PKWY DORAL, FL 33166 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3524 #322 MYRTLE BEACH, SC 29577 --- 0 MUSE, DAVID ELMO J MUSLIMANI, RAY MV MULTISERVICE INC ROSEMARY FOWLER MUSE PO BOX 110127 6823 LOCHNESS DRIVE 2193 CLEMENTINE ST NAPLES, FL 34108 --- 103 MIAMI LAKES, FL 33014 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120---0 i MYER, ERIC L & MARY M NACHAMPASSAK, ANOUVONG NACIUS, THONISE ( I` 2165 FAIRMONT LANE PHETHOUDONE L NACHAMPASSAK IBERNA LOMME NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 2550 31ST AVE NE 3375 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 435 i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I NAFDOF PRIVATE SERIES 1 LLC ( ) NAFDOF PRIVATE SERIES I � NAFEH, ZAMIRA 2316 PINE RIDGE RD #453 I 2316 PINE RIDGE RD #453 IAN MICHAEL BOWLES NAPLES, FL 34109 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 3280 37TH AVE NE I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I i it NANCY JONES TRUST 1 !I NARDOFF PRIVATE SERIES 1 LLC NASSAR, MOHAMMED & JOHANNA WAYNE H JONES TRUST ? 2316 PINE RIDGE RD #453 I 2073 SATSUMA LANE 9605 S KEYSTONE DR NAPLES, FL 34109 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 LEE'S SUMMIT, MO 64086 --- 0 Packet Pg. 955 9.A.4.c NAUGHTON, CHRISTOPHER LEO NAVARRO, RICHARDS EDWINS U NAVARRO, SONIA 1867 ALAMEDA DR NURMIAN DEL VALLE RONDON 2465 41ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 1916 WELLINGTON ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAWROCKI, BRENT ALEN NEDDY CAPITAL LLC NEDUMGOTTIL, SUMOLJ STEPHANIE MOORE NAWROCKI j 8951 ROYAL DR 8951 ROYAL DRIVE 2012 PARSON ST i BURR RIDGE, IL 60527 --- 0 BURR RIDGE, IL 60527 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120---0 � i I NEFF, DEBORAH A i NELSON, COREY & DEBORAH NELSON, RODNEY R & KATHLEEN L 2081 SATSUMA LN i I 2566 39TH AVE NE 2443 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34120--7553 NGIN, SOTHEARY SOK ( NICOLAS, BENCHY & MILDRED NOEL, JOSEPH SOTHEAVY SOK NGIN I 3675 29TH AVE NE ( i ROSE JEAN 2207 VERMONT LN ` NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I 3445 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1547 NORMIL, ANNETAL & TANJA t NOTO, BORAN ' NOVOA, FABIANA ANDREINA 2386 HEYDON CIR E I BAYAN EBEID MATTHEW CHRISTOPHER DUNHAM NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 8104 153RD AVE 2625 27TH AVE NE HOWARD BEACH, NY 11414 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NUGENT III, LEE & CATHERINE S NUNEZ, DAISY NUNEZ, JUAN J & VIVIAN 2105 CLEMENTINE STREET 488 NE 18TH ST #4501 I 2480 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MIAMI, FL 33132 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34120---0 I NUREDINI, PELLUMB OBEIRNE, JOHN OBERLIES EST, DEBORAH L KRYSTEN MARIE NUREDINI 2130 HAMLIN ST 2730 35TH AVE NE 2252 DANCY ST I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120---441 I NAPLES, FL 34120---0 j OBREGON, ADAM NESTOR j OBREGON, ANTHONYJOSEPH WALSH i OCAMPO SR, EDGARDO & ELVIRA IVONNE MUSTIGA IVONNE ROSAS LOPEZ 2904 UNIVERSITY AVE 2196 VERMONT LN 4905 BARCELONA CIR WAUKEGAN, IL 60085--- 3147 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 I I OCHOA, JOSE ANTONIO MEDIA I OCHOA, SANTO GIL ODOM JR, JAMES R & ODALYS I REBECA VAZQUEZ ZEPEDA I 2485 39TH AVE NE I 2184 VERMONT LN 2436 EVERGLADES BLVD N I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I OFER, ABRAHAM JACOB OGDEN, MARGARET M i OGIESTE, RUTH R CYNTHIA ANNE OFER 11 N HONEYMAN RD 2340 37TH AVE NE j 154 FARRINGTON AVE WHITE HSE STA, N1 08889--- 3635 ! NAPLES, FL 34120---7542 SLEEPY HOLLOW, NY 10591--- 1305 • i ' Packet Pg. 956 9.A.4.c OJEDA, FRANCISCO 243135TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1877 OLD TOWNE CONSULTING INC 14991SAVANNAH DR NAPLES, FL 34119--- 4803 OLIVERA, OSDEYMI YANIURKI MADRIGAL CASTRO 3451 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ORANGE BLOSSOM RANCH COMMUNITY DEV DISTRICT WRATHELL HUNT & ASSOC LLC 2300 GLADES RD STE 41OW BOCA RATON, FL 33431 --- 0 ORTEGA, CHRISTOPHER J 19 FRANK ST AGAWAM, MA 01001 --- 0 ORTIZ, LUIS & VELIA A 2231 VERMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 OSPINA, GUSTAVO & DEISY 14792 SUTHERLAND AVE NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 OWENS, DALE L & LORY L 2206 HEYDON CIR W NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 PADILLA, JAIME L 3413 TISDALE DR LEXINGTON, KY 40503--- 4234 i PALACIOS, MILSA S JUAN M PALACIOS 3843 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1531 OLAN JR, DIRK ALFONSO DORA ANGELA SUAREZ 1866 ALAMEDA DR NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 OLIVA, ENRIQUE 2890 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 OLSZEWSKI, DARIUSZ BOGUSLAW URSULA OLSZEWSKI 18406 ARAPAHOE CIR PORT CHARLOTTE, FL 33948 --- Q ORANGE BLOSSOM RANCH DOMMUNITY DEV DISTRICT WRATHELL HUNT & ASSOC LLC 2300 GLADES RD STE 41OW BOCA RATON, FL 33431 --- 0 ORTEGA, HECTOR F 2720 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 441 ORTIZ, SAMUEL SHARON FLORENCE RAYMOND 260 CLARK BLVD MASSAPEQUA PARK, NY 11762 --- 0 OTTO, KELSEY MARIE 1886 ALAMEDA DR NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 P&J FLORIDA LLC 175 GREAT NECK RD STE 407 GREAT NECK, NY 11021 --- 0 PADRON, ARMANDO E & PAULA 0 12851 NW 2ND ST MIAMI, FL 33182--- 1103 PALACIOS, PEDRO D & LUDY V 201 PORTER STREET NAPLES, FL 34113 --- 0 OLCEAN, IOAN MARIUS MARIA CLAUDIA PRADA 4430 FOREST HILLS BLVD PARMA, OH 44134 --- 0 OLIVA, MAYLA 3230 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120--- 5595 ORANGE BLOSSOM RANCH COMMUNITY DEV DISTRICT V. WRATHELL HUNT & ASSOC LLC 2300 GLADES RD STE 410W BOCA RATON, FL 33431---0 ORR, THOMAS 2247 DANCY ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ORTIZ, JUAN M & TAMARA D 3261 24TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3595 OSBORN, ZACHARY P 2870 41ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1580 OWEN, HARRY & SUSAN LYNN 2230 VERMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 PADILLA, ANDREW KARA SEMBIANTE 2360 ORCHARD ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 PALACIO, JUANITA M JOAQUIN C PALACIO JUANA PALACIO 622 E RIDGE VILLAGE DR CUTLER BAY, FL 33157 --- 0 PALECEK, EDWARD J & MARILYN R PO BOX 535 LINTHICUM HTS, MD 21090 --- 535 Packet Pg. 9 7 9.A.4.c PALMA, ALEX PALUMBO, LOUISE PALUMBO, PIER ANGELO ERICA VELASQUEZ 148 RAFF AVE ANA HERMINIA CORDOVA GUTIERREZ 3330 35TH AVE NE MINEOLA, NY 11501--- 3119 2470 41ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 PAPADOPOULOS PAPOLCZY, HEIDI E PARDO, PEDRO & MERCEDES D PO BOX 265 2480 27TH AVE NE 2910 GOLDEN GATE BLVD W BIRMINGHAM, MI 48012 --- 0 I ; NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7410 I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1738 j PARISI FAMILYTRUST I� �I PARISI, STEPHEN ANTHONY PARKER, MARK A & PAMELA M 1921 WELLINGTON ST I ANDREA ELISABETH PARISI I 15911 BANCROFT CT # 826 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i 2368 ORCHARD ST OMAHA, NE 68130 -0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i I PARKER, MARK A & PAMELA M I PARKER, PETER PARKINSON, KENNETH R 15911 BANCROFT CT #826 2403 HEYDON CIR E CATHERINE PARKINSON ( OMAHA NE 68130 --- 0 ! III NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 2234 HEYDON CIR W NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4584 PARMAR REV LIVING TRUST PARMAR, KIRPAL S PARMAR, KIRPAL S & SARBJEST 1464 SUTTER BUTTES ST SARBJEET K PARMAR 3660 EVERGLADES BLVD N CHULA VISTA, CA 91913 --- 0 3660 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7812 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7812 PARMENTER, JOSHUA M l PARRA, JORGE ANDEW CAMPOS PARSONS, DAILIS 2992 37TH AVE NE I ROSA FABIOLA JADUE CASSIS 3491 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I 2132 PARSON STREET NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I PARUCHURI, SREE H SUDHAKAR PATTEN, ROY E & ROBERTAT PATTERSON, KIMBERLY A i j 2192 CARA CARA WAY I 16105 RIGGS RD JOHN W PATTERSON IV NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 STILWELL, KS 66085--- 9256 2107 HAMLIN ST j j NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 PAWLOWSKA, TEKLA I PAZ, LINDA L ( PEARSEY, JANE BLACKMORE BOGDAN JAN PAWLOWSKI 755 NW 80TH ST 2561 24TH AVE NE 2271 VERMONT LANE ( I MIAMI, FL 33150 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3555 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I _ PECORARO, FRANK S & MARIA C 1 f PECORELLA, RYAN & REGINA R PELIER, EUDY DURAN I 748 NW 123RD DR 2232 DANCY ST ANAVEL ESTEVEZTIRADO CORAL SPRINGS, FL 33071 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 2525 37TH AVE NE iNAPLES, FL 34120--- 7437 PELLETIER, JASON DANIEL PENA, FRANK LORENZO RANGEL PENA, ROBERTO BRITTANY PELLETIER I MARIELBA LEON DE RANGEL I I 2064 SAGEBRUSH CIRCLE I 2394 HEYDON CIRCLE E i ; I 2093 HAMLIN ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120---0 NAPLES, FL 34120 0 I Packet Pg. 958 9.A.4.c PENDER, FAYE YOUNG 2145 WOODBERRY RUN DR SNELLVILLE, GA 30078--- 5674 PENTZ, BETHANN 15 RED MILL ROAD ETTERS, PA 17319--- 1103 PERDOMO LUIS, YULEIVYS JUAN C MARTINEZ ROCHE 2286 HEYDON CIR W NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4584 PEREIRA, RUDYARD SAUCEDO 11925 COLLIER BLVD STE 102 NAPLES, FL 34116 --- 0 PEREZ, ANGEL & TANIA ROSA PEREZ 2980 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 PEREZ, BAISIA RAUL DIAZ MORALES 2485 41ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 2805 PEREZ, DIANE & AURELIO 2710 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 PEREZ, ERNESTO LEON YENISLEY HERNANDEZ VILLALOBOS 257141ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 PEREZ, HECTOR DANIEL 2715 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1881 PEREZ, JOSE 2141 NE 179TH ST N MIAMI BCH, FL 33162 --- 0 PENDL, ROBERT 2390 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7453 PERALTA, RAFAEL A & DIONISIA 2848 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 PERDOMO, JULIO C LEIDY D PERDOMO ZAVALA 4065 N EVERGLADES BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 PERERA, JULIO SANDRA ANGARITA 3675 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 PEREZ, ANTONIO & ERMIZ 2865 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 490 PEREZ, CARLOS & MARIA A 3430 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 PEREZ, ELIADES & ANA 3645 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34117 --- 0 PEREZ, ESTRELLA YANLHEISER R GONZALEZ 2575 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1404 PEREZ, HENRY 2042 MANDARIN LN NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4554 PEREZ, JOSE LUIS NENYSTORO 3945 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 PENKALA,FRANCES C/O CHERYLJANAKUS 18W521 S FRONTAGE RD LEMONT, IL 60439--- 8604 PERALTA, TONY J BEATO SOLANGE BRITO DE BEATO 2603 41ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 PEREIRA, ESTEFANIA 11 WOODLAND PARK DR 411 HAVERHILL, MA 01830 --- 0 PEREZ, ANGEL & TANIA 2970 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1489 PEREZ, ARMANDO T 2330 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 PEREZ, DAREINE 2920 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 PEREZ, ELIO 298124TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---3545 PEREZ, GUDELIA 2630 SW 19TH ST MIAMI, FL 33145 --- 0 PEREZ, JORGE LUIS GONZALEZ DIANA WALESKA VARGAS 3211 24TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 PEREZ, JUAN MIGUEL 2914 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4505 Packet Pg. 9 9771 9.A.4.c PEREZ, LISSETTE PEREZ, MIRTHA PEREZ, OMAR DIAS 2788 37TH AVE NE 2625 35TH AVE NE LUZ CASTRO NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1406 2780 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 PEREZ,OSCAR PEREZ, PEDRO PEREZ,RAFAEL OSMAYDY FERNANDEZ ! DENISSE CALDERON OTAMENDY 17220 SW 146TH CT DANIELA PEREZ FERNANDEZ i 6365 COLLINS AVENUE UNIT 3406 I MIAMI, FL 33177--- 6622 2710 27TH AVE j I MIAMI BEACH, FL 33141 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i PEREZ, RICHARD S j PEREZ, THOMAS & VENUS M i PEREZ, YUNIEL LUZIA DOS REIS PEREZ I 2292 DANCY ST I 961 15TH ST SW 5820 NE 22ND WAY #603 I I NAPLES; FL 34120 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34117 --- 0 FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33308 --- 0 � PERONA, MICHAEL & BARBARA E I PERRY, BARBARA JILL PERRY, RAYSHAWN LAMORRIS 739 JAQUES AVE 2226 HEYDON CIR W GINA MARIE GORDON RAHWAY, NJ 07065--- 3831 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I 2095 VERMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I PERSKY LIVING TRUST PETIT -JEAN, JUNIOR & LEANDER C PETRICH, JACK & DIANA 2454 HEYDON CIR E I 2198 HEYDON CIR W I 119 HEWITT BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 CENTER MORICHES, NY 11934 --- 0 PETTES, MARSHAWN D PHAM, DUCTHANH & HOATHI + PRAM, NHANT 18234 COYLE ST 3360 27TH AVE NE BACH LIEU THI HUYNH DETROIT, MI 48235 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3246 3285 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1565 PHAN, NAM V PHILLIPS, ANA M PHL CAPITAL INC 45 HARTFORD AVE I TIMOTHY L PHILLIPS 1241 19TH ST SW DRACUT, MA 01826 --- 0 2270 VERMONT LANE I NAPLES, FL 34117 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 l PIAZZA, MICHAEL CRAIG _ I PICHARDO, JHONY N ( PIERRETTE, MAX JENNA LEE PIAZZA YOSELYN J NUNEZ LUDERNE SAINT PREUX PIERETTE 2229 CARA CARA WAY 6911 ENIVRON BLVD #1K I 2735 37TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 LAUDERHILL, FL 33319 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 PIERSON REVOCABLE TRUST I. PIERSON, TASHA M PI IRAK, AILEEN K 2143 VERMONT LANE I 2411 39TH AVE NE I ( ENE PIIRAK NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I I 132 MAYWOOD DR I SYRACUSE, NY 13205---2402 I PIMENTEL, JOHN I i PIMENTEL, JOSEPH &THANH-THUY I i PIMPINELLA, CATHY 2730 NE 41 PLACE 4620 SW 148TH TER 46 MULBERRY AVE HOMESTEAD, FL 33033 --- 0 MIRAMAR, FL 33027--- 3322 f i . STATEN ISLAND, NY 10314 --- 0 Packet Pg. 960 9.A.4.c PINEDA SR, JOSE G PINEDA, MARIA FERNANDA PINEDA, MARIO A 3585 33RD AVE NE 5527 NW 125TH TER 2875 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ,i CORAL SPRINGS, FL 33076 --- 0 �I t NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7432 PINTO, JOSE E & CECILIA PIRIZ, MONICA RODRIGUEZ I PISANO, ERNEST & PATRICIA 2575 27TH AVE NE i 299124TH AVE NE 2213 HEYDON CIRCLE W NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ; I I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 PISKADLO, EDWARD & CYNTHIA PISTORIO EST, ANGELINE I PITTJR, JOHN THOMAS 2266 VERMONT LN 7980 N NOB HILL RD APT 108 MARY BETH LORENZ 0 NAPLES, FL 34120---( f TAMARAC, FL 33321--- 7406 I 1720 STEAM ENGINE KENTWOOD, MI 49508 --- 0 PLANTIN, JUNIOR 1 POGAN, WILLIAM C POOLE ZACHARY T & MELISSA D 3330 31ST AVE NE TEAGAN J DOYLE I 2710 37TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 3735 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i POREMBA REVOCABLE TRUST PORFIDO, FRANK A & MILAGROS PORRAS, CRISTOBAL 2009 FAIRMONT LN 2305 TANGERINE LN MARIA DE LOS ANGELES GONZALEZ NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4574 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 4500 28 AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116---0 PORTAL, XIOMARA PORTER, JOSEPH E & MARY JANE POSEY, MICHAEL & CARA 2395 39TH AVE NE 4789 HAYGOOD POINT RD 2170 CLEMENTINE ST NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7558 VIRGINIA BEACH, VA 23455---4748 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 POSTIGO, CARLOS RICARDO I ; POTEET, NATHAN ISSAC POTLURU, PITCHAIAH CHOWDARY 2731 NE 3RD DR UNIT 205 NICOLE VONDERAU POTEET I RAMYA MOVVA HOMESTEAD, FL 33033--- 7085 I 2118 SATSUMA LANE 3287 PACIFIC DR I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 � NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 POWERS, WALTER & GERALDINE PRAT, MARIA ESTHER 1 PRECISE REALTY GROUP LLC 330 EAKER PL 3272 33RD AVE NE 2056 SAGEBRUSH CIR DES PLAINES, IL 60016---6037 I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I PRESTIGE VISION DEVT LLC _ PREVATT, DANNY JUSTIN l I PRIAS, JORGE A & PATRICIA M 2920 NW 56TH AVE APT B411 JESSICA MARIE PREVATT 2870 27TH AVE NE LAUDERHILL, FL 33313 --- 0 2453 HEYDON CIR E I i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I I I PRICE, JOHN I PRIETO, CHRISTINAA I I PRIETO, FELIX 2197 HEYDON CIR W 2445 27TH AVE NE FELIX U PRIETO NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4583 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7493 2445 27TH AVE NE i NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7493 Ili Packet Pg. 961 9.A.4.c PRIETO, PEDRO PABLO PROGRESS RES BORROWER 2 LLC PROGRESS RES BORROWER 2 LLC YAIMA GONZALEZ PENA PO BOX 4090 PO BOX 4090 3432 33RD AVE NE SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85261 --- 0 SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85261 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ! I PROK, TATYANA & PAUL PRONOVOST, LAWRENCE JOSEPH PROSKURNIA, STANISLAW & KAREN 2288 DANCY ST i SHARON LYNN PRONOVOST 2183 VERMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 2071 VERMONT LN I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I I PROTESHCHAK, OLEG i PRUDENT, STVIL I PRUITT, TANKER D & LUCY 100 MYRTLE AVE #13 CLARINETTE CHARITE i 2995 39TH AVE NE STAMFORD, CT 06902 --- 0 I 2121 FAIRMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 l PRZYGODSKI, JOEL i PULIDO, NELSON SERGIO PULIDO, SARA DONNY PRZYGODSKI I BARBARA PULIDO I I 8252 NW 6TH TERRACE #246 LESLEE PRZYGODSKI I 1 2275 DANCY ST I MIAMI, FL 33126 --- 0 513 RED MAPLE DR I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 TECUMSEN, MI 49286 --- 0 PULTE HOME COMPANY LLC PULTE HOME COMPANY LLC PULTE HOME COMPANY LLC 2431 WALDEN CTR DR STE 300 I 2431 WALDEN CTR DR STE 300 2431 WALDEN CTR DR STE 300 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 J � PULTE HOME COMPANY LLC PULTE HOME COMPANY LLC PULTE HOME COMPANY LLC 2431 WALDEN CTR DR STE 300 I 2431 WALDEN CTR DR STE 300 2431 WALDEN CTR DR STE 300 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 PULTE HOME COMPANY LLC PULTE HOME COMPANY LLC PULTE HOME COMPANY LLC 2431 WALDEN CTR DR STE 300 2431 WALDEN CTR DR STE 300 2431 WALDEN CTR DR STE 300 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 i BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 PULTE HOME COMPANY LLC PULTE HOME COMPANY LLC I PULTE HOME COMPANY LLC 2431 WALDEN CTR DR STE 300 I 2431 WALDEN CTR DR STE 300 2431 WALDEN CTR DR STE 300 I BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 I BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 i PULTE HOME COMPANY LLC I PULTE HOME COMPANY LLC i i 1 I PULTE HOME COMPANY LLC 2431 WALDEN CTR DR STE 300 I 2431 WALDEN CTR DR STE 300 I i 2431 WALDEN CTR DR STE 300 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 i BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 I i BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 PULTE HOME COMPANY LLC i PULTE HOME COMPANY LLC PULTE HOME COMPANY LLC I 2431 WALDEN CTR DR STE 300 i 2431 WALDEN CTR DR STE 300 I 2431 WALDEN CTR DR STE 300 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 i BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 i BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 Packet Pg. 962 9.A.4.c PULTE HOME COMPANY LLC PULTE HOME COMPANY LLC PULTE HOME COMPANY LLC 2431 WALDEN CTR DR STE 300 2431 WALDEN CTR DR STE 300 2431 WALDEN CTR DR STE 300 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 PULTE HOME COMPANY LLC i PULTE HOME COMPANY LLC PULTE HOME COMPANY LLC 2431 WALDEN CTR DR STE 300 2431 WALDEN CTR DR STE 300 2431 WALDEN CTR DR STE 300 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134---0 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134- 0 PULTE HOME COMPANY LLC i I I PULTE HOME COMPANY LLC PULTE HOME COMPANY LLC 2431 WALDEN CTR DR STE 300` 2431 WALDEN CTR DR STE 300 2431 WALDEN CTR DR STE 300 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 I BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 II BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 PULTE HOME COMPANY LLC l �_ PULTE HOME COMPANY LLC 1 PULTE HOME COMPANY LLC 2431 WALDEN CTR DR STE 300 I I 2431 WALDEN CTR DR STE 300 2431 WALDEN CTR DR STE 300 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 I BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134---0 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 PULTE HOME COMPANY LLC PULTE HOME COMPANY LLC PULTE HOME COMPANY LLC 2431 WALDEN CTR DR STE 300 2431 WALDEN CTR DR STE 300 2431 WALDEN CTR DR STE 300 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 I BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 PULTE HOME COMPANY LLC PULTE HOME COMPANY LLC PULTE HOME COMPANY LLC 2431 WALDEN CTR DR STE 300 2431 WALDEN CTR DR STE 300 2431 WALDEN CTR DR STE 300 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134---0 PULTE HOME COMPANY LLC PULTE HOME COMPANY LLC PULTE HOME COMPANY LLC 2431 WALDEN CTR DR STE 300 2431 WALDEN CTR DR STE 300 1 2431 WALDEN CTR DR STE 300 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 PULTE HOME COMPANY LLC PULTE HOME COMPANY LLC l PULTE HOME COMPANY LLC 2431 WALDEN CTR DR STE 300 I 2431 WALDEN CTR DR STE 300 I 2431 WALDEN CTR DR STE 300 BONITASPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 BONITASPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 I BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 PULTE HOME COMPANY LLC i PULTE HOME COMPANY LLC PULTE HOME COMPANY LLC 2431 WALDEN CTR DR STE 300 2431 WALDEN CTR DR STE 300 2431 WALDEN CTR DR STE 300 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 I ' BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 PULTE HOME COMPANY LLC PULTE HOME COMPANY LLC PULTE HOME COMPANY LLC 2431 WALDEN CTR DR STE 300 2431 WALDEN CTR DR STE 300 2431 WALDEN CTR DR STE 300 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 i BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 Packet Pg. 963 9.A.4.c PULTE HOME COMPANY LLC PULTE HOME COMPANY LLC PULTE HOME COMPANY LLC 2431 WALDEN CTR DR STE 300 2431 WALDEN CTR DR STE 300 2431 WALDEN CTR DR STE 300 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 PULTE HOME COMPANY LLC PULTE HOME COMPANY LLC PULTE HOME COMPANY LLC 2431 WALDEN CTR DR STE 300 j 2431 WALDEN CTR DR STE 300 2431 WALDEN CTR DR STE 300 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 i I BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 I I I I BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 i I PULTE HOME COMPANY LLC PULTE HOME COMPANY LLC PULTE HOME COMPANY LLC 2431 WALDEN CTR DR STE 300 j I 2431 WALDEN CTR DR STE 300 I 2431 WALDEN CTR DR STE 300 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 I i I BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 PULTE HOME COMPANY LLC PULTE HOME COMPANY LLC j PULTE HOME COMPANY LLC 2431 WALDEN CTR DR STE 300 I 2431 WALDEN CTR DR STE 300 I I 2431 WALDEN CTR DR STE 300 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 f ff BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 I i PULTE HOME COMPANY LLC PULTE HOME COMPANY LLC PULTE HOME COMPANY LLC 2431 WALDEN CTR DR STE 300 2431 WALDEN CTR DR STE 300 ( 2431 WALDEN CTR DR STE 300 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 II BONITASPRINGS, FL 34134---0 PULTE HOME COMPANY LLC PULTE HOME COMPANY LLC t� PULTE HOME COMPANY LLC 2431 WALDEN CTR DR STE 300 I ( 2431 WALDEN CTR DR STE 300 2431 WALDEN CTR DR STE 300 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 1 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134---0 II PULTE HOME COMPANY LLC ` PURNELL, BAILEY I PYATT, MICHAEL D & LEE A 2431 WALDEN CTR DR STE 300 ( 2239 VERMONT LN I 2122 CLEMENTINE STREET BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120---0 I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 QUENALLATA, LUIS FERNANDO QUENALLATA, LUIS FERNANDO QUENALLATA, LUIS FERNANDO I ANA OROZCO I ANA OROZCO ANA OROZCO I j 14634 SW 132ND AVE I 14634 SW 132ND AVE 14634 SW 132ND AVE MIAMI, FL 33186 --- 0 I MIAMI, FL 33186 --- 0 I MIAMI, FL 33186 --- 0 QUENALLATA, LUIS FERNANDO QUIGLEY, THOMAS & ANGELA j ( QUINN, JOHN E & AMY W ANA OROZCO I 2058 MANDARIN LN I 2 GLEN LOCH WAY j 14634 SW 132ND AVE I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4554 I MALVERN, PA 19355--- 1956 j MIAMI, FL 33186 --- 0 jl QUINONES, REYNALDO & LILIANA QUINTERO, ANA C !� QUINTERO, KARISSA 2645 27TH AVE NE 17111 BISCAYNE BLVD 3362 RANDALL BLVD i NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1484 N MIAMI BCH, FL 33160 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 F Packet Pg. 964 9.A.4.c R F BERMAN REV TRUST OF 2012 R P & M D BELL REV TRUST RAGAN, JOHN DAVID & LESLIE 611 1ST SW 58 NORTH COLLIER BLVD #414 2240 DANCY ST NAPLES, FL 34117 --- 0 � MARCO ISLAND, FL 34145 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 RAM BUILDING LLC RAMAKRISHNA SURAPANENI AND I I I RAMIREZ, AIDA 3231 WHITE BLVD LAKSHMI SURAPANENI LIV TRUST I I 5882 W 2ND CT NAPLES, FL 34117 --- 0 1982 FAIRMONT LN i i HIALEAH, FL 33012--- 2611 ! NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I I i i RAMIREZ, ALFREDO E RAMIREZ, ANDRELIS RAMIREZ, BARBARA 2545 29TH AVE NE KEYSSER G R RODRIGUEZ 3030 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I 2092 HAMLIN ST NAPLES, FL 34120---1574 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 jl RAMIREZ, JOSE R & NEYSI (( RAMIREZ, MARIA L RAMIREZ, MITCHELL 460 24TH AVE NE I I 3440 35TH AVE NE ( ( 3650 15TH AVE S W NAPLES, FL 34120--- 2388 NAPLES, FL 34120---1562 I NAPLES, FL 34117 --- 0 I RAMIREZ, OSCAR FERNANDO GUZMAN RAMIREZ, YOANDRY E RAMIREZ-CRUZ, MARCO A 1850 ALAMEDA DR 3365 27TH AVE NE FRANCISCA RODRIGUEZ-GAMBOA NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 2398 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 RAMOS PENA, DAVID A RAMOS, ARIEL RAMOS, BEATRIZ 2888 EVERGLADES BLVD N DUNIA GARCIA RAMIRES I TATIANA BARRIOS NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 2748 35TH AVE NE 3459 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 441 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I RAMOS, JOSE M & MARIA A RAMOS, JOSEFINO RAMOS, MICHAEL 3635 31ST AVE NE 2370 415T AVE NE STACIE L WHITLEY NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 2813 2175 VERMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 l� RAMOS, ODALIS N RAMOS, OLGA i RANCH AT ORANGE BLOSSOM AMBROCIO RAMOS 5178 GENOA ST MASTER ASSOCIATION INC 3310 41ST AVE NE I AVE MARIA, FL 34142 --- 0 % KEB MGMT SERVICES I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 6017 PINE RIDGE RD # 262 ( NAPLES, FL 34110---0 RANCH AT ORANGE BLOSSOM RANCH AT ORANGE BLOSSOM I RANCH AT ORANGE BLOSSOM MASTER ASSOCIATION INC I MASTER ASSOCIATION INC I MASTER ASSOCIATION INC % KEB MGMT SERVICES % KEB MGMT SERVICES %KEB MGNT 6017 PINE RIDGE RD # 262 I i 6017 PINE RIDGE RD # 262 6017 PINE RIDGE RD #262 NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 RANCH AT ORANGE BLOSSOM RANCH AT ORANGE BLOSSOM RANCH AT ORANGE BLOSSOM MASTER ASSOCIATION INC MASTER ASSOCIATION INC I MASTER ASSOCIATION INC %KEB MGNT %I<EB MGNT %KEB MGNT 6017 PINE RIDGE RD #262 6017 PINE RIDGE RD #262 6017 PINE RIDGE RD #262 NAPLES, FL 34119---0 NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 Packet Pg. 965 9.A.4.c RANCH AT ORANGE BLOSSOM RANCH AT ORANGE BLOSSOM RANCH AT ORANGE BLOSSOM MASTER ASSOCIATION INC MASTER ASSOCIATION INC MASTER ASSOCIATION INC %KEB MGNT %KEB MGNT %KEB MGNT 6017 PINE RIDGE RD #262 6017 PINE RIDGE RD #262 6017 PINE RIDGE RD #262 NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34119 --0 RANKIN, YALLEN AGUILA RAPACCIUOLO, DAVID & JACQUELIN I RAPHAEL, MARIE M 2720 39TH AVE NE 2075 SAGEBRUSH CIR WILLY EDOUARD NAPLES, FL 34120---0 I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4569 I 288020TH AVE NE i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 RAUBA,CORD I RAUTIO, SANDRA JEAN _I 1 RCSL IRREVOCABLE TRUST 9653 OGDEN CT AMY JEAN RABER ' 8 EAGLE GLENN COVE THORNTON, CO 80029 --- 0 3230 37TH AVE NE I LITTLE ROCK, AR 72223 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 REDDEN, FREDERICKJ & NEDRA I, ( REGALADO, MARLENE DE LA C Z i� REGALADO, RAQUEL 2250 HEYDON CIR W f MIRIEL PULIDO GUERRA 9517 SW 138 PLACE #9517 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4584 3590 31ST AVE NE MIAMI, FL 33186 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 REIFF, RYAN A & JENNIFER A REI NA, JORGE E , RENA LOU WILSON 2087 SAGEBRUSH CIR 2370 RANDALL BLVD J ' 6035 NORTH WATERBURY ROAD NAPLES, FL 34120---4569 NAPLES, FL 34120---5517 ` ' �' DES MOINES, IA 50312-- 0 1l RENDA, MICHAEL & MARIA RENDA, MICHAEL & MARIA " . RENE, ONE KINGS 11 PEARL ST 11 PEARL ST I SHAMOY GRACE RENE WHITE HSE STA, N1 08889--- 3632 WHITE HSE STA, NJ 08889--- 3632 2977 41ST AVE NE I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 RENGIFO, MONICA MARIET l RENTERIA, MARIA G . REQUENA, ALFREDO J & BARBARA LUIS JAVIER RENGIFO I HILARIO ROGRIGUEZ-MENDEZ JOSE A REQUENA 1920 WELLINGTON ST 2980 31ST AVE NE 2059 SAGEBRUSH CIR NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4505 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4569 RESTREPO, LUIS A REYES, GILBERTO l REYES, MARTHA ROCHE 2889 INLET COVE LN W ROBERTO REYES I ELPIDIO NARANJO NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 3330 33RD AVE NE 2675 37TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 REYES, PAOLA A I REYES, PERFECTO L & MARTA R � I REYES, TOMAS A & JUANA R 3245 29TH AVE NE I 3670 6TH AVE NE 2845 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 5590 REYMARRE CORP i REYNOLDS, ANDRE RIBISI, CHRISTIAN & NORMA 821 NW 32 CT I ! 2160 FAIRMONT LN ' 3415 EVERGLADES BLVD N MIAMI, FL 33125 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120---4575 I I I ; I� NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 W, Packet Pg. 966 9.A.4.c RICARDO, RACQUEL ANN 3200 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 RIDER, DANIEL 2148 FAIRMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I I! i RILEY, RILEY & ROSE A 2206 VERMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 II RIPLEY, DEBORAH 2294 HEYDON CIR W NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4584 RISCH, ALEXIS L ROBERTO MARTINEZ 2965 41ST AVE N E NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 l RIVERA, ANTONIA I \ 3595 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 RIVERA, MONICA FABIOLA 2670 OIL WELL RD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I f RIVERO, OSVALDO & YAQUELIN JESSICA RIVERO EDY MONTERO 3580 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34117 --- 0 ROBBINS II, DONALD SHERWOOD RENATA ROBBINS 2285 VERMONT LANE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i ROBERTS, MICHAEL D & DEBORAH A I 313 HIDDEN RIDGES CT COMBINED LOCKS, WI 54113 --- 0 I i i RICHARD FRANKLIN BERMAN TRUST 611 1ST ST SW NAPLES, FL 34117 --- 0 RIENZI, MARIAA GRAHAM MARCUS 2154 CLEMENTINE ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 RINER, JAMES C 3565 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---1557 RIPOLL, KENNY SYLVIA Y MALDONADO 2352 ORCHARD STREET NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 RIVADENEIRA, FERNANDO 3390 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 RIVERA, IVAN R & ELIZABETH C PO BOX 139 SABANA SECA, PR 00952 --- 0 RIVERA, TOMAS 3290 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 RIZZO, STEPHEN ANGELA MARIE DEPALMA 2097 HAMLIN ST NAPLES, FL 34120---0 ROBERT L HILLJR FAMILYTRUST 985 1ST AVE S NAPLES, FL 34102 --- 0 ROBINSON, ASHLEY CLIFTON T ROBINSON 2043 SAGEBRUSH CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 RICO, JOHNNY RICARDO VICTORIA SOLORIO ARREGUIN 2810 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 RIGLEY, BILL HOWARD DIANA LYNN RIGLEY 2179 VERMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 RIOS, NICHOLAS & MAGALYS 128 NE 26TH TER HOMESTEAD, FL 33033 --- 0 RIQUELME, ANGEL JESUS NICOLETTE RIQUELME 237135TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 RIVAS-RIVERA, CARLOS A JACLYN PROFFITT 5111 GENOA ST AVE MARIA, FL 34142 --- 0 RIVERA, KRYSTINAJ 3290 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120--- 5595 RIVERO, FANNY BUSTAMANTE 2348 ORCHARD ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 RJB CAPITAL LLC 501 GOODLETTE RD N STE D-100 NAPLES, FL 34102---0 ROBERTS, MARK 2660 OIL WELL RD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ROBINSON, PAUL & ALDITH 2895 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7432 Packet Pg. 967 9.A.4.c ROBLESJR, CHRISTINO & TATIANA ROCKS, RACHAEL G & JONATHAN C RODRIGUEZ TORREZ, BRENDA L 2940 RANDALL BLVD 2457 HEYDON CIR E 1310 NW 1315T ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 • NORTH MIAMI, FL 33167 --- 0 f RODRIGUEZ TR, JUAN C RODRIGUEZ, ABRAHAM E RODRIGUEZ, ABRAHAM MELENDEZ ZENAIDA M RODRIGUEZTR VALERIE MAGILEWSKI MARISOL MELENDEZ 12425 SW 88TH CT i ' 2670 35TH AVE NE MAYRA ROMERO MELENDEZ MIAMI, FL 33176--- 5213 ( NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 SENON ROMERO HERNANDEZ 2860 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 RODRIGUEZ, ALBERTO &JUANA M I RODRIGUEZ, ARIAN RODRIGUEZ, CAMILO 2560 29TH AVE NE ANA C JUSTINIANO j 2385 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7407 2323 31ST AVE NE ( ( NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 443 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 RODRIGUEZ, CARLINA E IRIBARREN l RODRIGUEZ, CHRISTOPHER L RODRIGUEZ, EDGAR & ANA M ESTEBAN DEJESUS SARABIA 2144 FAIRMONT LN 2157 FAIRMONT LN 2832 37TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---4575 NAPLES, FL 34120---0 I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I RODRIGUEZ, EMIL RODRIGUEZ, FERDINAND l RODRIGUEZ, FRANCISCO LADY JOHANA RODRIGUEZ VIRGINIA RODRIGUEZ I 2390 31ST AVE NE 2627 37TH AVE NE 7426 SURREY WOOD LN NAPLES, FL 34120--- 2920 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 APOLLO BEACH, FL 33572---0 RODRIGUEZ, JAVIER & ANA RODRIGUEZ, JAVIER & ERIKO M RODRIGUEZ, JORGE L & ANABEL 293152ND AVE NE 331135TH AVE NE 3160 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1516 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 RODRIGUEZ, JOSE ALBERTO RODRIGUEZ, LAZARA MUNOZ RODRIGUEZ, MARTHA ANDRES RODRIGUEZ 3229 29TH AVE NE FABIAN FLORES ZAMARRIPA 16357 SW 68TH TER NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 2920 37TH AVE NE MIAMI, FL 33193--- 4441 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 RODRIGUEZ, NAZARIO D RODRIGUEZ, PRAXEDIS f RODRIGUEZ, RICARDO MIRTHA RODRIGUEZ 2640 EVERGLADES BLVD N 3220 41ST AVE NE 8101 SW 12TH ST NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1526 I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1501 MIAMI, FL 33144--- 4325 RODRIGUEZ, ROSA A j I RODRIGUEZ, YULEINY CERVANTES I RODRIGUEZ-AMADO, ARIEL M 2520 29TH AVE NE 2975 31ST AVE NE I I MARIA CAROLINA MONSALVE-JASPE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7407 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 2192 DANCY ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I RODRIGUEZ-DE VEER, GAVIENE M ROE, MICHAEL ALAN & TARAJEAN ROJAS, ARLEY LOPEZ N EMILY RODRIGUEZ URQUIOLA I I i 339031ST AVE NE KATIUSKA BALBERAN ALMEIDA 2992 41ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 2985 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120---0 Packet Pg. 968 9.A.4.c ROJAS, DAVID F ROJAS, JUDITH ROJAS, RAUL A & ELVIA ADRIANA ESTEVEZ MICHEL HERRERA-MACIAS 1687 SW 136TH PL 2530 27TH AVE NE 3920 EVERGLADES BLVD N MIAMI, FL 33175---1052 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 , i ROMAIN, CLARK ELDER ROMEO, GEORGEANNE E I. ROMERO RAMOS, LILI MARLENY 2220 DANCY ST i 2525 39TH AVE NE I LUIS ARMANDO ROMERO AREVALO NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ! I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I 732 LONG LINES LN LEHIGH ACRES, FL 33974 --- 0 ROMERO, C MARISELA MIJANGO ROMERO, KATHERINE M ROMULUS, ROBERSON JUNIOR 3745 41ST AVE NE I CELINA M MIJANGO I 2865 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 0 I I 3745 41ST AVE NE i NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1440 iII �l NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i ROQUE, YOVANNIS ROSADO, BRANDYN NICOLE II ROSADO, OMAR & VICTORIA N MONICA E SATO ROQUE 3522 29TH AVE NE 3375 RANDALL BLVD i 2262 HEYDON CIRCLE W I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 j NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ROSILLO SR, JOSE L I ROSS, MARK L & GRETCHEN J i ROSSI, BRETT P & AMBER L 2520 RANDALL BLVD 3636 EVERGLADES BLVD N 2230 HEYDON CIR W i NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3694 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7812 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ROSU, VALERICA 1 ROTEN, BARBARA D ( ROTTIERS, RAFAEL & FELICITAS V 2088 HAMLIN ST I 2291 DANCY ST I 3268 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ROWE, CHRISTINE C } ROY, ANDREW D RP ORANGE BLOSSOM OWNER LLC I ROBERT N ROWE JR 2011 SAGEBRUSH CIR % ROCKPOINT GROUP LLC 4417 RED HOLLY CT NAPLES, FL 34120---0 3953 MAPLE AVE # 300 CHARLOTTE, NC 28215---9001 CALLAS, TX 75210 --- 0 RP ORANGE BLOSSOM OWNER LLC RP ORANGE BLOSSOM OWNER LLC RP ORANGE BLOSSOM OWNER LLC I % ROCKPOINT GROUP LLC % ROCKPOINT GROUP LLC ( % ROCKPOINT GROUP LLC 3953 MAPLE AVE # 300 3953 MAPLE AVE # 300 3953 MAPLE AVE # 300 CALLAS, TX 75210---0 I CALLAS, TX 75210---0 DA;;AS, TX 75219 --- 0 r RP ORANGE BLOSSOM OWNER LLC RP ORANGE BLOSSOM OWNER LLC r RP ORANGE BLOSSOM OWNER LLC % ROCKPOINT GROUP LLC % ROCKPOINT GROUP LLC I % ROCKPOINT GROUP LLC 3953 MAPLE AVE # 300 3953 MAPLE AVE # 300 I 3953 MAPLE AVE # 300 DALLAS, TX 75219 --- 0 DALLAS, TX 75219 --- 0 I DALLAS, TX 75219 --- 0 RP ORANGE BLOSSOM OWNER LLC i RP ORANGE BLOSSOM OWNER LLC I r RUA, JEFFREY ABEL % ROCKPOINT GROUP LLC I % ROCKPOINT GROUP LLC ROSEMARIE SUDANO 3953 MAPLE AVE # 300 3953 MAPLE AVE # 300 I 2907 41ST AVENUE NE DALLAS, TX 75219 0 DALLAS, TX 75219 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 Packet Pg. 969 9.A.4.c RUBINO, JOSEPH & LINETTE RUBIO, LUZ LAZO RUFOLO, JOSEPH M 2076 FAIRMONT LN CATHERINE RUBIO CACHO SUSAN E RUFOLO NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4573 3275 29TH AVE NE 2101 SATSUMA LANE NAPLES, FL 34120 0 i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 RUIZ, ANGEL RODRIGUEZ i RUIZ, ERIC A CAMPOS RUTEAGA, ISAAC SONIAJIMINEZ RIVERA j 3225 37TH AVE NE ! 2735 29TH AVE NE 2085 HAMLIN ST ! NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i I � RUTTER, ROGER JASON j RUZ, DULCE M I S S RAKEL FITZGERALD TRUST MICHELLE RENEE RUTTER I 2380 31ST AVE NE I 131 HAWKS RIDGE CIR 2165 CLEMENTINE ST I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 2920 I LOVELAND, OH 45140 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I i SAA, MARITZA I SAAVEDRA, JAVIER SABINA, GILBERTO LUIS 1 MALATESTA I ELSA ABARCA I LUZ M CALERO 80-45 KEW GARDEN RD #404 18860 NW 78TH PL 14256 5W 23RD ST ` KEW GARDEN, NY 11415 --- 0 HIALEAH, FL 33015--- 5272 I MIAMI, FL 33175--- 8023 SACCO, DOMINIC A & KIMBERLY A SADLER, DUSTIN & SAMANTHA SAFFOLD, JAMES A & SHARMAN L 2218 VERMONT LN 3370 27TH AVE NE 2171 VERMONT LANE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3246 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I SAINT, HARVINDERSINGH H SAINTHEARD, SMITH ( SAINVIL, GEROSKY F i 3230 33RD AVE NE ISADORA DEJERVIL MEGAN N SAINVIL j NAPLES, FL 34120---0 3680 37TH AVENUE NE I 2142 CLEMENTINE ST i j NAPLES, FL 34120--- 2807 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 SAITH, VIJAY J & TASLEEMA R SALDARRIAGA, DIANY I SAMMUT, ANTONIO 2133 FAIRMONT LN I 3445 RANDALL BLVD l GAIL ANTOINETTE SAMMUT NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4576 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I 55953 SEQUOIA CT iSHELPYTOWNSHIP, MI 48316 --- 0 1 SAN LAZARO INVESTMENTS LLC ( SAN LAZARO INVESTMENTS LLC SANABRIA, JACQUELINE LORRAINE 3506 E 23RD ST 3506 E 23RD ST GILBERT SANABRIA j ALVA, FL 33920--- 1312 I ALVA, FL 33920--- 1312 2065 HAMLIN 5T NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i SANCHEZ CAMARGO, YANDY II SANCHEZ, DAHILL SANCHEZ, FRANCISCO ACOSTA I 2829 RANDALL BLVD , DAVID REYES I MARLON J ACOSTA I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I 2880 39TH AVE NE j 2786 31ST AVE NE j NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 SANCHEZ, JADE & ERIC SANCHEZ, JESUS I I SANCHEZ, JESUS 24TH AVENUE 2442 29TH AVE NE 2442 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i NAPLES, FL 34120 --7540 Packet Pg. 970 9.A.4.c SANCHEZ, MERCEDES 2885 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 SANDERS, JAMES & DAWN 2101 CLEMENTINE STREET NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 SANJAY DEO REV TRUST MANISH NAGPAL ASHISH DHAM 4836 CHARDONNAY DR CORAL SPRINGS, FL 33067 --- 0 SANTILLI, MARLENEJ 224 OWL CT FREMONT, CA 94539--- 6200 i SANTOS, CHRISTOPHER A MONICA FABIOLA RIVERA 2670 OIL WELL RD NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4529 ( SAUL, JOHN F & ANNETTE 2281 VERMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 SCARLE, ANGELA BETH JEREMY LANCE SCARLE 2147 VERMONT LANE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 SCHMIDT, LADONNA K KEVIN J SCHMIDT 4522 PORTOBELLO CIR VALRICO, FL 33596--- 8500 i SCHNECK, MICHAEL D & CRYSTALJ 2033 FAIRMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4574 i SCHULTZ, TAMARA & JASON JOHN 2294 VERMONT LANE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 SANCHEZ, SILVIA & RICARDO 3730 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 SANDERS, ROBERT & MARY T 2178 CLEMENTINE ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 SANTAMARIA, GISELLE DEL CARMEN 12205 180TH AVE CT E BONNEY LAKE, WA 98391 --- 0 SANTINI, KIRK JOSEPH 3881 66TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 SARDINAS, PABLO 20261 SW 316 ST HOMESTEAD, FL 33030 --- 0 SAUNDERS, HALEY & JAYSON 2540 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 SCHARF, JOAN M 2475 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3573 SCHMITT EST, RAYMOND EDWARD LAUREN A SCHMITT 2214 HEYDON CIR W NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 SCHOENBACHLER, JEFFREY ALAN MELISSA MARIE SCHOENBACHLER 2190 CLEMENTINE ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 SCHULZ, JASON R 2571 24TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3555 SANCHEZ-PENALVER, ALFONSO 2015 PARSON STREET NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 SANDSTEDT, MELISSA 2967 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 SANTIAGO, JOSIE PASAG HECTOR A SANTIAGO 2067 SAGEBRUSH CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 SANTOEMMAJR, JOHN JOSEPH ELSA NOEMY CALDERON 2055 SAGEBRUSH CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4569 SARNA, JULIUS G & ADELINE M G WHITE 3452 MONO DR RIVERSIDE, CA 92506--- 2117 SAVALIA, PRASHANT MANHAR 801 LINCOLN GLEN DR BUENA PARK, CA 90620 --- 0 SCHILLER, PAUL & ASHLEY RAE 2364 ORCHARD ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 SCHMITT, LAREEN ANN ANDREW MICHAELSCHMITT 2931 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 SCHUFF, ARNOLD J & JEAN A 2406 HEYDON CIR E NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 SCHWAB, CHARLES M & DOROTHY M 12859 AXLINE RD LOVETTSVILLE, DC 20180--- 2708 Packet Pg. 971 9.A.4.c SCHWALM, MARION K &JEFFREY SCIRE, MAURIZIO SCOTT, I W & MARGARET 3775 EVERGLADES BLVD N BETELEHEM YIRGA GABREYOHANNES 4401 WATERBURY RD NAPLES, FL 34120---3242 2109 PARSON ST RALEIGH, NC 27604 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 SCOTT, JOHN EDMUND SEGURA, GERMAN D i SELVA, CELESTE V KATHLEEN BENZ SCOTT 8101 SW 24TH CT HENRY B SELVA JR 2525 RANDALL BLVD i UNIT 407 PO BOX 830669 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 5577 DAVIE, FL 33324 --- 0 I i MIAMI, FL 33283---0 SEMANCIK, KELLY SERGILE, EZECHIEL & NICOLE I SERPA, JEANNE & LAUREOLO A 2399 HEYDON CIRCLE E I 2010 FAIRMONT LN 2460 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ( NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i I SERRANO, OMAR & MELISSA I� SESTY, PATRICK F & FELICIA R SETA, RICHARD A 3440 RANDALL BLVD ( 2255 VERMONT LN I ANTHONY CRISCI NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I 3 KING ARTHUR CT lI EAST SETAUKET, NY 11733 --- 0 SEVERYN, MIGUEL & MELISSA SEVILLA, EMERSON RAFAEL R SEWELL, LANG L 2149 FAIRMONT LN 1878 ALAMEDA DR ANTONIO L BOLLING NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7812 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 2559 41ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 SHAFFER, NATHAN M SHAVER, JEREMY SCOTT SHAW, CHARLES BORDEN & LISA JO TANIA P MAYNETTO I JULIA LEE SHAVER 2386 ORCHARD ST 2080 HAMLIN ST 3840 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 SHAW, RACQUEL ALECIA SHAW, TYLER LANGDON SHAWN D HOROZINSKI LIV TRUST OMARIO HUBERT SHAW CATHERINE RUTH SHAW CLIFFORD HOROZINSKI 2923 27TH AVE NE 2268 DANCY ST 14626 N 35TH AVE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 PHOENIX, AZ 85053--- 4601 SHEIKH, MAHAMMED S i SHEKER, BRUCE MATTHEW ( SHEPARD, MOLLY LYNNE SHAMIM SHEIKH THERESA LYNN SHEKER RYAN M SHEPARD j 205 NW 128 AVE 2112 MINNEOLA ST 2565 29TH AVE NE MIAMI, FL 33182 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ! SHEPPARD, SCOTT & BRENDA ) II SHIRLEY, THERESE SHOPPES AT ORANGE BLOSSOM LLC 2063 VERMONT LN 5464 AGOSTINE WAY 1200 NETWORK CENTRE DR STE 2 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 AVE MARIA, FL 34142 --- 0 i EFFINGHAM, IL 62401 --- 0 SIEPIERSKI, JOEL ARTHUR SIFRE, CHARLESA i SILVAJR, RICHARD RENEE LYNN SIEPIERSKI GIOVANNA QUINTANA I I 1141 SW 44TH TERRACE 2211 DANCY ST j 3435 RANDALL BLVD I CAPE CORAL, FL 33914 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3536 Packet Pg. 972 9.A.4.c SILVA, JENFRIT NORANDO SILVERIO, ALEXEY GARCIA i SIMIAN HOLDINGS IRA LLC CAROLINE JANE SILVA ELAINE A MARTINEZ RODRIGUEZ ! AUTUMN SKY HOLDINGS LLC 2099 SAGEBRUSH CIR 2730 39TH AVE NE ! 14907 S BILLINGS DR NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ; HERRIMAN, UT 84096 --- 0 I SIMKO, CHRISTOPHER , SIMONSEN, SANDRA L SINATRA, ANTHONY &JILLIAN 2215 VERMONT LN THOMAS L LYONS I I 2058 MINNEOLA ST NAPLES, FL 34120---0 1 LANARK RD APT 3 i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BROOKLINE, MA 02445--- 1832 I SINCIC, STEVEN J & DENISE L I SMALLHORN, SHARON M i SMITH, CORY M 4465 RANCH RD I ERNEST L SMALLHORN 2061 MANDARIN LN WILLIAMSBURG, MI 49690--- 9623 I 1986 FAIRMONT LN I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 � I SMITH, JASON L SMITH, JOHN R SMITH, KEVIN 1 JEREMY 0 SMITH KRISTEL RABORN 3970 EVERGLADES BLVD N 1906 NE 34TH LANE 2775 OIL WELL RD NAPLES, FL 34120---0 CAPE CORAL, FL 33909 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4454 SMITH, PATRIC WALTER SMITH, TINA JOY SMITH-WILLIAMS, KAREEN SIMONE 2236 DANCY ST CHAD ERIC BROWN MICHAEL CLAYTON NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 3245 31ST AVE NE 2146 CLEMENTINE ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 SNYDER, BRANDY LYNN SOCCI, SUSAN SOLA, ELSA ADAM JOSEPH GRISANTI 2125 CLEMENTINE STREET MADIAN I LOPEZ 2084 FAIRMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 GRACIELA M GOMEZ NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 6641 SW 5TH ST j PEMBROKE PINES, FL 33023---1227 i SOLARES, MARCO SOLORIO, JOSE GARCIA SOSA, PEDRO A & ISABEL M 2485 NE 135TH TER I 3282 31ST AVE NE 940 W 43RD ST NORTH MIAMI BEAC, FL 33181--- 3520 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 HIALEAH, FL 33012--- 7252 SOSA, ROSA JOSE SOTO JR, ROBERTO & ADELAIDA SOTO JR, RUPERTO OLIVIA VASQUEZ ( 2830 35TH AVE NE ( I ADELAIDA SOTO 2679 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i 2830 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 I NAPLES, FL 34120---489 SOTOLONGO, DANI SOTOLONGO, JAVIER SOTOMAYOR, JORGE A 3610 35TH AVE NE 2765 RANDALL BLVD CHRISTINE SOTOMAYOR NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 2980 RANDALL BLVD I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 SPARKS, CHARIE ! SPIES, CHRISTOFFELJ I SPRING, SUZANNE 4995 TALLOWOOD WAY i KIMBERLY A SPIES 741 HILBISH AVE NAPLES, FL .34105 --- 0 i 2136 FAIRMONT LN AKRON, OH 44312--- 3087 i NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4575 Packet Pg. 973 9.A.4.c ST CYR, JOSUE & MALIA FAUSTIN DANIEL LOUIS MARIE MAGDALA HILAIRE 2730 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 STANKIEWICZ, JEREMY RAYMOND 2062 MANDARIN LN NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4554 STECKMAN, NICKOLAS ERIC ERICA BACHER STECKMAN 2925 37TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 STEWART, KEATON C 3470 33RD AVENUE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 STONESON, RICHARD A & CAROL 2186 CLEMENTINE ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 STROETER, ASHLEY NICOLE I CLARK P STROETER 3525 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1563 SUAREZ, LIBERTAD 9239 SW 227 ST N2 MIAMI, FL 33190 --- 0 SULLIVAN, CORNELIUS 2440 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---442 SUNNY HOME SOLUTION LLCTR SUNNY HOME SOLUTION LLC UTD 1/1/04 407 PINEWOOD DR OLDSMAR, FL 34677--- 5508 SURANYI, FERENC 2744 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ST JEAN, KERLANDE STALLONE, PAUL & GRAZIA L CARL MULTIDOR 2390 HEYDON CIR E 1924 WELLINGTON ST NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4578 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 STANLEY, SUZANNE S & BRYAN D STARRETT, JOSHUA MICHAEL 3415 29TH AVE NE CAROLYN ELIZABETH STARRETT NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1885 2235 DANCY ST NAPLES, FL 34120---0 STEK, SCOTT C & JENNIFER R I STEVENSON, DAVID J & PAULA A 2109 FAIRMONT LN 3590 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4576 I ii NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1556 I STEWART, NALINE I STOECKLEIN, DONALD P & ROSEANN KIMNA KY 2314 HEYDON CIR W 29 ROWE STREET ` NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NEWTON, MA 82466 --- 0 STORWICK, TONY PETER I STOVALL, STEVEN M LIBNY STORWICK CYNTHIA HERRERA STOVALL 3517 EVERGLADES BLVD N 2385 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 -i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 t STROM, WILLIAM A & ANDREA K SUAREZ SR, ARMANDO & LICY S 2006 FAIRMONT LN ( 3260 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 SUAREZ, NELSON SUAREZ, SILVESTRE 2895 27TH AVE NE 488 WINCHESTER AVE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7415 UNION, NJ 07083--- 7912 SUMIRA HOLDINGS LLC SUMMERS II, ROBERT DEWSON 870 14TH ST SE I I TINA MICHELLE SUMMERS NAPLES, FL 34117 --- 0 2049 HAMLIN ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 SUNSHINE FL DEVELOPMENT INC SUNSHINE HOME CLNG & CARE LLC 1030 PORT ORANGE WAY I 2575 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 SUTHERLAND, KEITH REX I SWFL ROMAJI LLC STEPHANIE ORENTHEA SUTHERLAND I 4951 TAMIAMI TRAIL N STE 103 2106 HAMLIN 5T NAPLES, FL 34103 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 Packet Pg. 974 9.A.4.c SWIATKOWSKI, DOUGLAS SYLVESTRE, NATACHA SYNERGY INVEST LLC SAMIRA G SWIATKOWSKI 4135 EVERGLADES BLVD N ' 5934 PREMIER WAY #2162 5059 FORESTDALE DR NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 494 NAPLES, FL 34109--- 0 WEST BLOOMFIELD, MI 48322 --- 0 I I TABOR, ANNA TADROS, MAHFOUZ TADROS, MAHFOUZ & RENEE F CHRISTOPHER CATALANO i RENEETADROS I 940 CAPE MARCO DR #1704 3645 CITRUS TRACE UNIT 6 940 CAPE MARCO DR I MARCO ISLAND, FL 34145---0 DAVIE, FL 33328 --- 0 I i # 1704 I i MARCO ISLAND, FL 34145 --- 0 TADROS, MAHFOUZ & RENEE F TADROS, RENEE i TADROS, RENEE j 940 CAPE MARCO DR #1707 MAHFOUZTADROS MAHFOUZ TADROS MARCO ISLAND, FL 34145 --- 0 940 CAPE MARCO DR #1704 940 CAPE MARCO DR #1704 MARCO ISLAND, FL 34145 --- 0 �. MARCO ISLAND, FL 34145 --- 0 i TADROS, RENEE TADROS, RENEE F TADROS, RENEE F MAHFOUZTADROS MAHFOUZTADROS MAHFOUZTADROS 940 CAPE MARCO DR #1704 940 CAPE MARCO 940 CAPE MARCO DR MARCO ISLAND, FL 34145 --- 0 # 1704 # 1704 MARCO ISLAND, FL 34145 --- 0 MARCO ISLAND, FL 34145 --- 0 TADROS, RENEE F i TADROS, RENEE F I TADROS, RENEE F MAHFOUZTADROS ! MAHFOUZTADROS I MAHFOUZTADROS 940 CAPE MARCO DR 940 CAPE MARCO DR 940 CAPE MARCO DR #1704 # 1704 MARCO ISLAND, FL 34145 --- 0 MARCO ISLAND, FL 34145 --- 0 MARCO ISLAND, FL 3414S --- 0 TADROS, RENEE F TAGLIA, JOSEPH P & LISA M TALADRO ENTERPRISE LLC MAHFOUZTADROS 2309 TANGERINE LN 12555 ORANGE DRIVE #220 940 CAPE MARCO DR #1704 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33330 --- 0 MARCO ISLAND, FL 34145 --- 0 TALALENKO, GREGORY TALAVERA, JOSE L TALLEYRAND, ROMANE JESSICA LJAGODZINSKI RAMIRO DIAZ NADINE BTALLEYRAND 2096 FAIRMONT LN 2707 NW 7TH TER 3320 33RD AVE NE i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 CAPE CORAL, FL 33993--- 7016 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1538 f TANQUILUT, MARLENE J TASSY, ROBENS TAUNK, PUSHPAK 34446 N EASTI NGS WAY 3565 31ST AVE NE SILPA THAIVALAPPIL TAUNK GURNEE, IL 60031--- 4286 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 3421 W. HORATIO ST #112 TAMPA, FL 33609 --- 0 I: TAYLOR JR, MILLARD i TAYLOR SR, RODNEY L ' TEGROTENHUIS, JUSTIN 1981 SAGEBRUSH CIRCLE LISA MARIE TAYLOR CHRISTINA MICHELLE SHUTTER NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ! 3630 35TH AVE NE 2149 CLEMENTINE ST I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 TEJADA, PAOLA ANDREA ( TELISCHAK, PATRICIA ANNE I ! TELLECHEA-MENDOZA,JUAN 3840 EVER GLADES BLVD N i JOHN TELISCHAK i I OLGA TELLECHEA NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ! 2167 VERMONT LANE 3180 41ST AVE NE i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 Packet Pg. 975 9.A.4.c TENDERO, JENNIFER TEREKHOV, SERGEY TERRERO, RAIZA MAYQUEL SALGADO 3580 2ND AVE NE 3682 YOSEMITE CT 2735 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34117 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34116---7301 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 TESSIN, RANDY RAY THOMAS LEE KITTS LIVING TRUST THOMAS, JANICE HEATHER NICOLETESSIN 219 DOLPHIN COVE CT JIMMY M THOMAS 2217 HEYDON CIR W I BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134--- 7456 '• i 7130 BREWSTER LN NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4585 , I � i MISSOURI CITY, TX 77459---0 THOMAS, LISA THOMAS, ROBERT RANDOLPH THOMAS-CARROLL, CELENA LANETTE JACOB THOMAS I I MELANIE THOMAS I DAMES GIANFERRARA I 3019 ALLMAN PL 2134 CLEMENTINE ST I 2420 37TH AVE NE BADEN, PA 15005- 0 I i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ! THOMPSON, DANIAL R THOMPSON, DOROTHY KISHIA THOMPSON, LISA ANN & PAUL W ! BRIGITTE R THOMPSON 2920 RANDALL BLVD 2595 35TH AVE NE i 1993 SAGEBRUSH CIR NAPLES, FL 34120--- 5502 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I THOMPSON, LORENE & RAYMOND L 1 THOMPSON, MARIA V I THOMPSON, MARIA V 2029 MANDARIN LANE CONSTANTINOS A LEVANOS CONSTANTINOS A LEVANOS NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 23941 ADDISON PLACE CT 23941 ADDISON PLACE CT BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134---0 BONITASPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 l THOMPSON, MARK J & BARBARA D THOMPSON, MICHELLE THOMPSON, TYLER STEVEN 2086 PARSON ST i MICHAELJOSEPH PANTO JESSICA ANN THOMPSON NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 2203 VERMONT LN 2356 ORCHARD ST I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 THOMSON, ANDREA TIMOTHY M TALBOTT JR REV TRUST I TINIZHANAY, LUIS A 102 WOODRUFF COURT ( 2626 OIL WELL RD MARGARET MONENTE CARY, NC 27518---0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 22 KING EIDER WAY TAYLORS, SC 29687 --- 0 I• j TIRADO, CHRISTINE M TIRADO, RUDY E & MARIA E I TOBERMAN, DUSTIN D CLARISSAJ TIRADO I I 2306 HEYDON CIR W MICHELLE LTOBERMAN 2228 DANCY ST I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4586 2398 ORCHARD ST i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I I I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I TODD, TROY E & SHEILENE TOLEDO FERNANDEZ, JUAN CARLOS TOLEDO SR, VIRVES & JUANA L 1972 PARSON ST ( DEBBY MAYOR 3395 35TH AVE NE I NAPLES, FL 34120---0 2360 37TH AVE NE ' NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1516 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7542 TOLEDO, ROBERTO & MADELIN TOLEDO, VIRVES & JUANA i TOM, HANG C 131 E 36TH ST 3395 35TH AVE NE DONNA YEE HIALEAH, FL 33013--- 2635 NAPLES, FL 34120---1516 219 17TH ST APT#1B BROOKLYN, NY 11215 --- 0 Packet Pg. 9 6 9.A.4.c TOM, HANG C TOM, HANG C TOM, HANG CHI DONNAYEE DONNAYEE DONNAYEE 219 17TH ST 219 17TH STREET 219 17TH ST APT 1 B APT 113 i APT 1 B BROOKLYN, NY 11215 --- 0 BROOKLYN, NY 11215 --- 0 BROOKLYN, NY 11215- 0 TORO GRADING CORP TORRES, DIEGO F TORRES, FRANCISCO 3315 31ST AVE NE 2689 41ST AVE NE LIDIA ESCOBAR NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I 2605 37TH AVE NE I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i TORRES, JORGET TORRES, LUIS E LEANEZ i TRADEWIND INVESTMENTS LLC 39615W 145 AVE I i THAMARAT ROMERO LOPEZ I 1655 MULLET C7 MIRAMAR, FL 33027 --- 0 I 368135TH AVE NE I I NAPLES, FL 34102 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 TRAN, CHAU N & OANH T I TREFNEY, JOSEPH TRENT, JAMES R 909 S WESTHILL CT I JILLIAN SCOTT 317141STAVE NE BLOOMINGTON, IN 47403---2119 I 1988 SAGEBRUSH CIR NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3276 I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4577 TRIANA FAMILY REV LIV TRUST TRIANA FAMILY REV/LIV TRUST !� TRIMBLE, DONALD G 4150 SW 112TH AVE 4150 5W 112TH AVE I" 2830 27TH AVE NE MIAMI, FL 33165- 0 MIAMI, FL 33165--- 4774 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3484 TRIPI, LEWIS TROFATTER JR, FREDERICK P TROMBLEYJENNIFER N9189 WEST RD HEATHER BTROFATTER 1436 KIWI COURT WATERTOWN, WI 53094--- 9172 19 QUALEY RD PUNTA GORDA, FL 33950 --- 0 GRAY, ME 04039 --- 0 TROUT, DARCI MARIE ( TRUONG, DANH TRUONG, HIEU VAN JASON RIAN TROUT HA THI MINH TRAN NGUYEN THI THU TRUONG i 401 WEST 3RD ST I 2108 PARSON 5T 2104 PARSON ST ELMHURST, IL 60126 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ( TSCHUPP, EDWARD W TUREK, NIKOLAS A 1 . ' TURLEY, BRETT A & WENDY P CAROLYN LESLIE PHELPS TSCHUPP 2765 41ST AVE NE ( 2278 HEYDON CIR W 2485 35TH AVE NE ( NAPLES, FL 34120--- 2801 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4584 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ; I , l TURNIPSEED, MARLIN E I TURNIPSEED, MARLIN E I TURNIPSEED, MARLIN E & KATHYJ KATHY J LOCKE TURNIPSEED KATHY 1 LOCKE-TURNIPSEED 3680 29TH AVE NE 3680 29TH AVE NE 3680 29TH AVE NE I NAPLES, FL 34120---0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 9582 TYBURSKI, JOHN i ULTIMATE REALTY INVESTS LLC I UNDERWOOD, FRANK GEORGE TYBURSKI I 1240 23RD 5T SW 2418 HEYDON CIR E 2046 MANDARIN LN I I NAPLES, FL 34117 --- 0 i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 Packet Pg. 977 UNICASA DEVELOPMENT INC UNICASA DEVELOPMENT INC 12555 ORANGE DRIVE UNIT 220 12555 ORANGE DRIVE UNIT 220 FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33330 --- 0 FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33330 --- 0 URIBE, PEDRO AYALA VADON ET AL, JO ANN ALMADELIA AYALA VINCENT L CALABRESE 3361 RANDALL BLVD `. %JOHN LEAVENS NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 2358 SHADE TREE LN CLEARWATER, FL 33759--- 1332 II VALDES, ALAYN GONZALEZ VALDES, ARACELIS ANALYN AMADOR i 2495 RANDALL BLVD 2583 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 VALDES, JORGE VITON i ( VALDES, JOSE FONTE BETSY BORREGO BADA I 3680 31ST AVE NE 2665 39TH AVE NE i NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4491 NAPLES, FL 34120---0 ,i VALDES, ROBERTO VALDES, YOAN ERLIANIS RIVES MEDEROS I 2545 39TH AVE NE 3420 27TH AVE NE I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 VALDEZ, EDGAR III 1, VALDIVIA, BRUNO & ASHLEY 5350 WARREN ST 2102 CLEMENTINE STREET NAPLES, FL 34113 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 VALERA, DANIELJOSE RIERA j i VALLADARES, CHARLES & KRYSTAL MARIA CAROLINA ROJAS-CEPEDA I I 2256 DANCY ST 2072 HAMLIN ST I I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 1 VALYKEO, EDWARD ALLEN j' VAN GUILDER SR, GERALD BYRON 292035TH AVE NE KATHLEEN MARGARET VAN GUILDER NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I 2158 CLEMENTINE ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 VAN WINKLE, MAURINE i I VANDERPLOEG, DUSTIN D 6833 FERSTEL RD I i YESENIA PEREZ VANDERPLOEG NEWBURGH, IN 47630---1747 2545 27TH AVE NE I i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 VANNATTEN, DENISE i I VANNAVONG, POUIE & BOUALOM 2475 29TH AVE NE 2665 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 5566 9.A.4.c UNICASA DEVELOPMENT INC 12555 ORANGE DRIVE UNIT 220 FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33330 --- 0 3 VAIRO, VANESSA J 3430 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1586 VALDES, JONATAN ALAYNA MARIE PEREIRO 3422 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 VALDES, MAGDIEL CLAUDIO ANA LEON GONZALEZ 1973 SAGEBRUSH CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 VALDES-LOPEZ, ALFREDO ASTRY MONTES 3695 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 418 VALENTINO, CLAIRE JAMES L EGOLF 2011 LIV TRUST 11764 NEW BUFFALO RD NORTH LIMA, OH 44452--- 9733 VALLEJO, CARLOS 2875 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---490 VAN HORN, SANDRA H & ROBERT M 3573 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 VANEK, MICHAEL A & JOY A 4514 S EMERALD AVE CHICAGO, IL 60609 --- 0 VARELA, DARIEL RAMOS i 3240 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i Packet Pg. 978 9.A.4.c VARGAS, PATRICIA 2089 FAIRMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 VASCONEZ, OSWALDO BOLIVAR PERLA MARIA VASCONEX OSWALD 0 VASCONEZ 2122 HAMLIN ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 VASSILOPOULOS, NICHOLAS C EMILY C VASSILOPOULOS 2374 HEYDON CIR E NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 VAZQUEZ, JIOVANNI 2995 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 VEGA EST, PABLO C 2325 OIL WELL RD NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7537 VELAZQUEZ DELTORO, KATIA ROBERTO PEREZ 2885 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 VICE INVESTMENT CORP 16845 NW 78TH AVE MIAMI LAKES, FL 33016 --- 0 VIERA, LUIS ALBERTO 142 SANTA CLARA DR #1 NAPLES, FL 34104 --- 0 VILAR, DUNIA PRIETO ROSA E VILLAR 11706SW 106TERR MIAMI, FL 33186 --- 0 I VILLAFRANCA, ARNALDO BARBARA VILLAFRANCA 6930 SW 178TH AVE SOUTHWEST RANCHE, FL 33331--- 1823 I VARGHESE, GEORGE CHECHAMMA GEORGE 703 SHERMAN AVE THORNWOOD, NY 10594--- 1428 VASHA, ARJAN & ESMERALDA 2003 PARSON ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 VAZQUEZ, CHRISTIAN M AMANDA R VAZQUEZ 3533 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 VAZQUEZ, LUDWIG J ALINA SANTANA HERNANDEZ 327124TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 VEGA, ANA ROSA 2380 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 VELEZJR, PEDRO & KENIA 1 2201 HEYDON CIR W. NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4585 VICTOR, NADIAJEAN BAZELAIS JEAN 409120TH PLACES W NAPLES, FL 34116 --- 0 VI ERA, TERESA 62S5 REVELRY CT AVE MARIA, FL 34142 --- 0 VILAUT, MARTHA GARCIA 2468 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 VILLERS, RANDY J VIRGINIA ANN VILLERS 2126 CLEMENTINE STREET NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 VARGO, BENJAMIN WILLIAM JAMIE MARIE ANDREWS 2870 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 VASQUEZ, DIEGO JOSELIN MELENDEZ VASQUEZ ' 3787 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i VAZQUEZ, JESSIC HECTOR MANUEL VAZQUEZ MARQUEZ 18493 SEBRING RD FORT MYERS, FL 33967 --- 0 VCC PROPERTIES LLC 6300 TRAIL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34108 --- 0 i VELASCO,ALBERTO & MARTHA 240 20TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 VENTURA, ANTHONY CHARLES LINDSEY RENEE VENTURA 2069 FAIRMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 VIERA, LUIS 534 37TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 1 _ i VIGNERI, THOMAS J & DIANE L 2458 HEYDON CIRCLE E NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I VILLAFRANCA, ARNALDO BARBARA L VILLAFRANCA 6930 SW 178TH AVE SOUTHWEST RANCHE, FL 33331---1823 VILORIA, JUAN J & SONNIA i 2990 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 Packet Pg. 979 VINCENZO & KATHLEEN PICERNO VINCENZO LAUCELLA & ROSETTA LIVING TRUST LAUCELLA REV LIVING TRUST 2359 35TH AVE NE 147-67 7TH AVE i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 QUEENS, NY 11357 --- 0 VITALE, SALVATORE VIVINO, GREGORY LAUREN DEBORAH ERSNER 2169 FAIRMONT LN 2485 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I ii VOGEL NORMAN IRVING I• WALIGORA FAMILY TRUST I LISA RUTH WEGWEISER VOGEL I j 2082 SATSUMA LANE 2807 35TH AVE I I NAPLES, FL 34120---0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i WALSH JR, EDWARD C i WALSH, BONNIE LJOLLY 2383 HEYDON CIR E I I 2400 OIL WELL RD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120---1471 WALSH, JONATHAN DANIEL WALSH, THOMAS L & JENNIFER R JANAI LOUISE MCCARTY WALSH I 2217 CARA CARA WAY 2375 HEYDON CIR E NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 WANG, SAI YU WAS►LEWSKI, DAVID J 560 25TH ST S W DEBORAH A WASILEWSKI NAPLES, FL 34117 --- 0 242129TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7553 WATSON, ERIC L & SHELLY A WEAVER, DENISE 2031 SAGEBRUSH CIR 2697 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4569 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7533 WENDEL, WILLIAM ROY • I WENDT, MATTHEW & MINDY L 3431 EVERGLADES BLVD N 3445 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 WERTZ, THOR MICHAEL j WEST, ANDREW RICHARD HEATHER LORRAINE WERTZ I GERREN MARIE WEST I 1995 FAIRMONT LN 3230 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i WGA HOMES INC i WHIFFEN, ANDREW T & ERIN 3210 EVERGLADES BLVD N I i 2161 FAIRMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 9.A.4.c VIRVES, CARLOS R CLAUDIA M 2470 39TH AVE NE r NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 VO, LONG T & OANH H 3042 TALKING ROCK DR FAIRFAX, VA 22031---0 WALLYS LAND LLC 1883 W ROYAL HUNTE OR SUITE#200A CEDAR CITY, UT 84720 --- 0 WALSH, EDWARD C NOREEN A WALSH 2379 HEYDON CIR E NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 WALTERS, RICHARD & SHELLY 2740 37TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---7457 WATSON, DAVID WADE & JOYCE A 816 FOSTER RD GUTHRIE, OK 73044--- 6709 WEISKOPF, JENNIFER IRWIN BRENTON KRISTOPHER WEISKOPF 2137 CLEMENTINE ST NAPLES, FL 34120---0 WERSHING ET UX, R J 4710 POWERS FERRY RD ATLANTA, GA 30327--- 3429 WESTHAVEN INVESTMENT CORP 6585 WEST 8 LANE HIALEAH, FL 33012 --- 0 WHITAKER, KEVIN RAY AMANDA GAYLE WHITAKER 2295 VERMONT LANE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 Packet Pg. 980 9.A.4.c WHITE, CHAD & SARAH WHITE, SILVIA WHITELOCKE, DWAYNE 2513 FLOWERING TREE LN 9 DIAS CREEK RD EVELYN ANDREA BURGESS MCGHEE GAMBRILLS, MD 21054 --- 0 CAPE MAY COURTHO, NJ 08108 --- 0 2259 VERMONT LANE s NAPLES, FL 34120---0 � c WICK, JOHN WICKERHAM 111, HOWARD L WIELAND, MONA 2060 HAMLIN ST I ANTOINETTE WICKERHAM 187 MOUNTAIN AVE '. NAPLES, FL 34120---0 2127 VERMONT LANE j j N CALDWELL, NJ 07006--- 4005 C i NAPLES, FL 34120---0 _ i i i i 1 1 a I WIGGINS, CHRISTOPHER WILFONG, RUSSELL A & DENISE M I WILLARD, JOSHUA S & ASHLEY E _ KRISTEN ANN SUMMERALLS j 1951 FAIRMONT LN i 2173 FAIRMONT LN 3670 35TH AVE NE i NAPLES, FL 34120---0 NAPLES, FL 34120---0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1878 �II I £ £ u WILLIAM E BROWN REVTRUST WILLIAMS JR, MICHAELC j WILLIAMS, ANDREW 294019TH AVE NE I 165 CORNERSTONE DR I 2360 415T AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7459 FRANKLIN, NC 27525 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--2813 e c I, c WILLIAMS, DOUGLAS EUGENE WILLIAMS, SEAN RAY MICHAEL WILLIAMS, THERESA LAURA MONICA JEAN WILLIAMS I BRITTANY LEIGH WILLIAMS I 2279 DANCYST C 2035 PARSON STREET 2237 CARA CARA WAY NAPLES, FL 34120---0 NAPLES, FL 34120---0 NAPLES, FL 34120---0 0 WILLIAMS, YVONNE P WILLIS, JUSTIN & KALLEY WILSON TR, GEORGE G 5546 113TH ST 2680 EVERGLADES BLVD N ( RITA M WILSON TR SEMINOLE, FL 33772--7153 NAPLES, FL 34120---0 I KIM M SHERMAN TR UTD 6/16/05 1 10220 FAIRWAY DR l ELLICOTT CITY, MD 21042--- 2115 I WILSON, EDWARD WILSON, JOCELYN NICOLE WILSON, REBECCA A ` MERIDITH KOVACH I 2047 SAGEBRUSH CIR 1711 W NELSON ST 2188 DANCY ST NAPLES, FL 34120---0 CHICAGO, IL 60657---0 . NAPLES, FL 34120---0 C I � C WINSLOW, RACHEL NICOLE WOOD 11, MICHAEL M & LAURA N WOOD, CARLALLEN & PAMELA JEAN p 2071 PARSON STREET 2520 315T AVE NE I I 2011 PARSON ST i NAPLES, FL 34120 0 NAPLES, FL 34120—0 NAPLES, FL 34120 0 i • a WOODRUFF, KIRK R WOODS, MARILYN CHRISTINE WOODSIDE, WILLIAM P & AMANDA J I JENNIFER ANN GAFFOLI WOODRUFF 2159 VERMONT LANE I 2703 37TH AVE NE 2271 HEYDON CIR W NAPLES, FL 34120---0 I NAPLES, FL 34120---0 a NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4585 + s I I I ' u WOOLFORK, RONNIE WORKMAN 11, DAVID L I WP RE VENTURES 1 LLC y 3286 37TH AVE NE 2010 WHITE OAK DR 166 W WASHINGTON ST i j NAPLES, FL 34120---0 i MORGANSTOWN, WV 26505 --- 0 I SUITE 730 • CHICAGO, IL 60602— 0 y t Packet Pg. 981 9.A.4.c WRIGHT, ROSSANA 2233 CARA CARA WAY NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 XU, CHUNFENG ZHENGYULU 20 BALDWIN DR NEW PROVIDENCE, NJ 07974 --- 0 YANEZ, RANDY CHRISTINA ANN YANEZ 3270 41ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 YEDRA, MANUEL 3363 29TH AVE N E NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 YRIATE, RONAL L LOPEZ IDALMYS DORTA MENENDEZ 2537 NE 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ZALDIVAR, LEONEL 15316 MARKHAM DR CLERMONT, FL 34714 --- 0 ZANDER, JON R & DEBRA J 2103 VERMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ZENAIDA GATTAMOTA REV TRUST 2295 SW 133RD CT MIAMI, FL 33175 --- 0 ZUFERRI, EDUARDO J &AIDA L 359129TH AVE N E NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ASTOLA, ALEN CALLE PONTE YEDRA #306 URBANIZACION LA ESTANCIA LAMOLINA-LIMA PERU WYNESS, ROBERTJ & PEGGY A 3825 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 Y & E REALTY INVT CORP INC 361 GOLDEN GATE BLVD W NAPLES, FL 34120---0 YARDLEY, KAYLIE MERCE DANIELTHOMAS PAQUETTE 1863 ALAMEDA DR NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 YETTER, MARY MARGARET PAULSTEPHEN YETTER 2306 TANGERINE LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ZAIDI, SYED SAEED REZA LISANDRA GARCIA 1871 ALAMEDA DR NAPLES, FL 31420 --- 0 ZAMORA, CARLOS ODILIA RICARDO 2658 41ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ZARATE, ERKA PAOLA 1994 FAIRMONT LN NAPLE, FL 34120 --- 0 ZHAO, RACHELY 2126 HAMLIN ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ZULUAGA, SEBASTIAN 8106 DREAM CATCHER CIR UNIT 3409 NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 BERTALAN,BERTA 5900 ARMSTRONG AVE #105 CSL H4W 2Z5 CANADA XIQUES, SYLVIA ENRIQUE XIQUES 6031 NW 201ST ST HIALEAH, FL 33015---4889 YAKIMO, ALLEN & KATHLEEN 264 N ROUTE 183 POTTSVILLE, PA 17901--- 8806 YECK TRUST 315 JACKSON ST PARIS, TN 38242--- 4164 YIDI, YASMITH 1995 PARSON STREET NAPLES, FL 34120--- 5317 ZALAZAR, RITA EVANGELINA 2435 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ZAMORA, YAIMA 2857 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1440 ZATLOKOVICZ JR, JOHN J DEBRAJ ZATLOKOVICZ 2163 VERMONT LANE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ZITER, JASON M 2136 PARSON STREET NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ANDERSON, JOAN 1 STEPHEN ANDERSON PO BOX 44 GRAND CAYMAN KY1-1601 CAYMAN ISLANDS : BROOKER, ESMEE E 134 ACK LA E i BRAMHALL CHESHIR SK7 2AB ENGLAND I S Packet Pg. 982 CADEZ, THOMAS MARIJA A CADEZ MARJETA & RICHARD F D CORLEY PO BOX 571 MILTON L9T5A2 CANADA GREENE, GORDON LLOYD GEORGIA DEVOST BONNY SEKI 104 60 JANE ST BOLTON L7E 2T1 CANADA M DOUYON DE AZEVEDO MEDICINE SOCIETE PROFESSIONNELLE 310 OLMSTEAD OTTAWA K1L 7K3 CANADA S B LUBKEY INSPECTION SER INC 58 ASTORIA PL DEVON T9GOM3 CANADA WATSON, RICHARD A CATHERINE E WATSON 5 DUVAL DR BARRIE L4M 6V2 CANADA Valencia Golf & Country Club HOA, Inc. 1711 Double Eagle Trail Naples, FL 34120 Waterways of Naples HOA, Inc. c/o Alliant Property Management, LLC 13831 Vector Ave Fort Myers, FL 33907 CADEZ, THOMAS PO BOX 571 MILTON L9T 5A2 CANADA HERNANDEZ, ROSA LEONOR ROJAS I APARTADO AEREO #93887 BOGOTA COLOMBIA I I i I PAVLOVSKY, VIKTOR MARINALURYE 29 PANTANO DR VAUGHAN L4JOA9 CANADA I SCHUMACHER, HERMANN & ILZE BECKSTR 53 DARMSTADT 64287 GERMANY WILLIAMSON EST, J A SUSAN E SMITH 932 PATTERSON RD DOURD DUMMER KOL 2HO CANADA Valencia Golf & Country Club HOA, Inc. 2400 First Street, Suite 300 Fort Myers, FL 33901 9.A.4.c DICARLO, STEFANO & ANNUNZIATA 16 STANLEY CARBERRY DR r BRAMPTON L6P OB9 CANADA LE, MY LE THI MYCHAU NGUYEN 7384 GLAMORGAN WAY MISSISSAUGA L5N7Z4 CANADA I i RAMPURE, AJITKUMAR M PARVATHI AJIT RAMPURE 2403 I 3650 KANEFF CRESCENT MISSISSAUGA L5A 4A1 CANADA TREMBLAY, SERGE 4 DU BELVEDERE DOMAINE DES HAUTS-BOIS STE JULIE J3E 3M 5 CANADA Golden Gate Estates Area Civic Asso., Inc. 2631 4th Street NW Naples, FL 34120 i Citrus Greens at Orange Tree HOA, Inc. 1130 Grove Drive Naples, FL.34120 Packet Pg. 983 9.A.4.c NIM #1 DOCUMENTS Q a C9 0 N N Co O O O N O N J a 0 Lo Co ti N N C O d O N N O O O O N O N J a •L m U a U U Co Packet Pg. 984 9.A.4.c Imm HOLE MONTES ENGINEERS - PLANNERS - SURVEYORS 950 Encore Way • Naples, Florida 34110 • Phone 239.254,2000 • Fax: 239.254.2099 November 12, 2021 Nancy Gundlach, AICP, Principal Planner Sue Faulkner, Principal Planner Growth Management Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Re: Mission Subdistrict GMPA (PL-20200002204) & Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples Community Facilities Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) Amendment (PL-20200002198) Neighborhood Information Meeting HM File No. 2006.096A Dear Ms. Gundlach and Ms. Faulkner: Enclosed please find the following documents in accordance with Collier County's Neighborhood Information Meeting requirements: • One (1) original executed Affidavit of Compliance (signed by Paula N. C. McMichael); • One (1) original Affidavit of Publication; • One (1) copy of the Neighborhood Information Meeting Notice advertisement which ran in the Naples Daily News on September 15, 2021; • One (1) copy of Neighborhood Information Meeting Notification Letter sent to Property Owners on September 15, 2021; and • One (1) copy of Property Owners List. • One (1) copy of Meeting Summary of the NIM; • One (1) copy of sign -in sheet from the NIM; and • One (1) flash drive with recording of the NIM. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, HOLE MONTES, INC. Paula N. C. McMichael, AICP Vice President PNCM/sek Enclosures as noted. H:\2006\2006096A\WP\CFPUD\NIM\NG & SF 211112 Itr tr NIM documents and recording.docx Naples - Fort Myers Packet Pg. 985 9.A.4.c AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE I hereby certify that pursuant to Ordinance 2004-41, of the Collier County Land Development Code, I did cause the attached newspaper advertisement to appear and I did give notice by mail to the following property owners and/or condominium and civic associations whose members may be affected by the proposed land use changes of an application request for a rezoning, PUD amendment, or conditional use, at least 15 days prior to the scheduled Neighborhood Information Meeting. For the purposes of this requirement, the names and addresses of property owners shall be deemed those appearing on the latest tax rolls of Collier County and any other persons or entities who have made a formal request of the county to be notified. The said notice contained the laymen's description of the site property of proposed change and the date, time, and place of a Neighborhood Information Meeting. Per the attached letters, property owner's list, and copy of newspaper advertisement which are hereby made a part of this Affidavit of Compliance. (Signature of Applicant) STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing Affidavit of Compliance was acknowledged before me this 301h day of September 2021 by means of X— physical presence or online notarization, by Paula N. C. McMichael, AICP, Vice President of Hole Montes, Inc., who is personally known —la me Xor who has produced as identification. Signatu e of Notary Public YOVO (Notary Seal) Printe Name of Notary ;o►�VAii�•. STEPNANIEKAROL Notary Public •State of Florlda Commission # GG 965839 My Comm. Expires Mar 9, 2024 Bonded through National Nolary Assn, Packet Pg. 986 9.A.4.c PART OF TW E USA TODAY NET W O RK Published Daily Naples, FL 34110 HOLE MONTES ASSOCIATES INC 950 ENCORE WAY STE 200 NAPLES, FL 34110 ATTN STEPHANIE KAROL Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WISCONSIN COUNTY OF BROWN Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, personally appeared who on oath says that they serve as legal clerk of the Naples Daily News, a daily newspaper published at Naples, in Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida; that the attached copy of the advertising was published In said newspaper on dates listed, Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County,, Florida; distributed.In Collier and Lee counties of Florida, each day and has been entered as second class mall matter at the post office in Naples, in said Collier County, Florida , for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. 9115/2021 Subscribed and sworn to before on September 151h, 2021 Notary,'St:.1'tif ,. j, Courily of Brown My commissl" expires: KATHLEEN ALLEN Notary Public State of Wisconsin PUBLICATION COST: $1,040.26 �=''`' y' AD NO: GC10726237 CUSTOMER NO: 530712 PO#: PUBLIC NOTICE Packet Pg. 987 9.A.4.c The public is invited to attend a neighborhood information meeting held by: Robert.). Mulhere, FA1CP, President, Hole Montes, Inc., Paula N. C. McMichael, A1CP, Vice President, Hole Montes, Inc, and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire of Coleman Yovanovich & Koester, P.A., on behalf of the property owners at the following time and location: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 5:30 p.m. Collier County OF/IFAS Extension, Multi -Purpose Room 14700 Immokalee Road, Naples, FL 34120 The following two concurrent applications have been made to Collier County Growth Management: These applications include (1) Mission Subdistrict GMPA (PL-20200002204) A Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) to amend the future land use subdistrict of Mission Subdistrict to add approx. 14 acres to the existing Subdistrict and to allow church -related uses on the additional acreage; and (2) Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples Community Facilities' Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) Amendment (PL-20200002198) An amendment to add approx. 14 acres to the PUD and allow church -related uses on the additional acreage. The approved PUD allows for 90,000 square feet of uses, including a 1,000-seat church and related social services; a 300-person daycare, and private school. The PUD amendment would allow for the same square footage and number of church seats, reduce the daycare to 200, and add not -for -profit community services including medical office, social services, and post -secondary education, plus essential and other services. These lands total 36± acres and are located in Section 19, Township 48 South, ; . Range 28 East, Collier County, Florida, on the south side of Oil Well Road, approx. one -quarter mile west of Everglades Blvd. ay Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples CFPUDAmendm.nt& Uoc l Mission Subdistrict Growth Management Plan Amendment Location Map y WE VALUE YOUR INPUT Business and property owners, residents and visitors are welcome to attend the presentation and discuss the project with the owners and Collier County staff. We will be adhering to social distancing protocols during the meeting. If you would rather not or are unable to attend the meeting and would like to participate via Zoom or view a video of the meeting, please email us at NeighborhoodMeeting@i,hmeng.com and we will send you a link. You may also email any comments or questions to NeighborhoodMeeting bj-neng.com. Please reference Mission Subdistrict GMPA and Emmanuel Lutheran CFPUD Amendment in subject line. Paula N. C. McMichael, A]CP, Vice President, Planning Services Q Hole Montes, Inc., 950 Encore Way, Naples. FL 341 10; Phone: 239-254-2000 wuGeil; 11RV. Packet Pg. 988 9.A.4.c IRM HOLE MONTES ENGINEERS • PLANNERS - SURVEYORS 950 Encore Way • Naples, Florida 34110 - Phone 239.254.2000 - Fax: 239.254.2099 September 15, 2021 Re: Mission Subdistrict GMPA (PL-20200002204) & Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples Community Facilities Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) Amendment (PL-20200002198) HM File No. 2006.096A Dear Property Owner: Please be advised that Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, President, Hole Montes, Inc., Paula N.C. McMichael, AICP, Vice President, Hole Montes, Inc., and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire of Coleman Yovanovich & Koester, P.A., have made the following two concurrent applications to Collier County Growth Management: These applications include (1) Mission Subdistrict GMPA (PL-20200002204) A Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) to amend the future land use subdistrict of Mission Subdistrict to add approx. 14 acres to the existing Subdistrict and to allow church -related uses on the additional acreage; and (2) Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples Community Facilities Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) Amendment (PL-20200002198) An amendment to add approx. 14 acres to the PUD and allow church -related uses on the additional acreage. The approved PUD allows for 90,000 square feet of uses, including a 1,000-seat church and related social services; a 300-person daycare, and private school. The PUD amendment would allow for the same square footage and number of church seats, reduce the daycare to 200, and add not -for -profit community services including medical office, social services, and post- secondary education, plus essential and other services. These lands total 36f acres and are located in Section 19, Township 48 South, Range 28 East, Collier County, Florida, on the south side of Oil Well Road, approx. one -quarter mile west of Everglades Blvd. In compliance with the Land Development Code requirements, a Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held to provide you an opportunity to hear a presentation about these amendments and ask questions. The Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held on Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 5:30 p.m. at Collier County UF/IFAS Extension, Multi -Purpose Room, 14700 Immokalee Road, Naples, Florida 34120. We will be adhering to social distancing protocols during the meeting. If you would rather not or are unable to attend the meeting and would like to participate via Zoom or view a video of the meeting, please email us at NeighborhoodMeeting@hmeng.com and we will send you a link. You may also email any comments or questions to NeigbborboodMeetinlz@hmeng.com. Please reference Mission Subdistrict GMPA & Emmanuel Lutheran Church (CFPUD) Amendment in subject line. Should you have questions prior to the meeting, please feel free to contact me at 239-254-2000. Very truly yours, IJOLE MONTES, INC. Paula N. C. McMichael, AICP Vice President, Planning Services Naples - Fort Myers Packet Pg. 989 9.A.4.c Neighborhood Meeting Summary Mission Subdistrict GMPA (PL-20200002204) Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples CFPUDA (PL-20200002198) September 30, 2021, 5:30 PM Collier County UF/IFAS Extension, Multi -Purpose Room 14700 Immokalee Road, Naples, FL 34120 The NIM was held for the above referenced petitions. The petitions are described as follows: 1. Mission Subdistrict GMPA (PL-20200002204) A Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) to amend the future land use subdistrict of Mission Subdistrict to add approx. 14 acres to the existing Subdistrict and to allow church -related uses on the additional acreage; and 2. Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples Community Facilities Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) Amendment (PL-20200002198) An amendment to add approx. 14 acres to the PUD and allow church -related uses on the additional acreage. The approved PUD allows for 90,000 square feet of uses, including a 1,000-seat church and related social services; a 300-person daycare, and private school. The PUD amendment would allow for the same square footage and number of church seats, reduce the daycare to 200, and add not -for -profit community services including medical office, social services, and post -secondary education, plus essential and other services. Note: This is a summary of the NIM. An audio recording is also provided. Applicant: Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples, Inc. Attendees: On Behalf of the Applicant: Howard Isaacson, Emmanuel Communities, Inc. & Emmanuel Academies, Inc., Chief Executive Officer Rev. Will Kittinger, Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples, Inc., Associate Pastor Paula McMichael, AICP, Hole Montes, Inc. Richard Yovanovich, Esq., Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. Norman Trebilcock, AICP, PTOE, PE, Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Six members of the public attended. Ms. McMichael started the presentation by introducing herself and the other consultants. She then provided a brief history and overview of the project, and the process for approval. Following Ms. McMichael's presentation there was approximately twenty minutes of questions. Page 1 of 2 H:\2006\2006096A\WP\CFPUD\NIM\NIM Summary (10-4-2021).doex Packet Pg. 990 9.A.4.c The following issues were raised: Access Concerns were raised regarding the proposed access point to SW 3Is' Ave. NE. The main access to the proposed development will be via Oil Well Rd.; however, we understand the public's concern and the applicant will review the proposed access to SW 31s1 Ave. NE. Intensity Questions were asked regarding the maximum total floor area allowed in the CFPUD. Although proposed amendment is adding acreage to the existing CFPUD, there are no changes proposed to the previously approved maximum of 90,000 square feet of total floor area, to the previously approved building height (two stories/ 30'), or to the previously approved trip cap. If the applicant wishes to increase the intensity in the future, a CFPUDA subject to the public hearing process will be required. Medical Offices Questions were asked about the proposed medical office uses. Any medical office uses are required to be run by non-profit entities in affiliation with the church and will not be a typical, commercial business entity. The meeting concluded at approximately 6:00 PM. Page 2 of 2 H:\2006\2006096A\WP\CFPUD\NIM\NIM Summary (10-4-2021).docx Packet Pg. 991 9.A.4.c FA NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH OF NAPLES COMMUNITY FACILITIES PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (CFPUD) AMENDMENT (PL-20200002198) & MISSION SUBDISTRICT GMPA (PL-20200002204) THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 30, 2021 AT 5:30PM PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY ***PLease be advised*** The information on this sheet is to contact you regarding this project and future public meetings. Under Florida law, e-mail addresses, phone numbers and certain home addresses are public records once received by a government agency. if you do not want your e-mail address, phone number or home address released if the County receives a public records request, you can refrain from including such information on this sheet. You have the option of checking with the County staff on your own to obtain updates on the project as well as checking the County Web site for additional information. Name Address City, State Zip E-Mail Address /'� V rrje t( Jl/tr{il�.� �(G�l1eV('61JRi� U c-Y� zza> V r Z7 �. �'i� i;/- N c 0 .N m v O N N O O O O N O N J a y CU �L CR G U d U U 00 t K W r C d E t v R r r a Packet Pg. 992 9.A.4.c NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH OF NAPLES COMMUNITY FACILITIES PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (CFPUD) AMENDMENT (PL-20200002198) & MISSION SUBDISTRICT GMPA (PL-20200002204) THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 30, 2021 AT 5:30PM PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY ***-Please be advbsed*** The information on this sheet is to contact you regarding this project and future public meetings. Under Florida law, e-mail addresses, phone numbers and certain home addresses are public records once received by a government agency. If you do not want your e-mail address, phone number or home address released if the County receives a public records request, you can refrain from including such information on this sheet. You have the option of checking with the County staff on your own to obtain updates on the project as well as checking the County Web site for additional information. Name Address City, State Zip E-Mail Address L% 1, Gaiv, n 4 31 Ave N No3 a Ito S%o r fSC,5S Qo . Jv u rJ LA-TI000 t ; l ZS3 1 S k 4/C- Ale- IVC 1,eS R_ 3 /zv KC; h Z3 - G-1 Al s3o s> Aw, ✓V£ R302o N c 0 N m W v 0 N N 0 Co 0 0 N 0 N J a N R �L C� G U d U U 00 t x w r c a� E r r a Packet Pg. 993 10WN 11NC 15317 SW 69TH LN MIAMI, FL 33193 --- 0 2540 315T AVE NE LLC 3430 13TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34117 --- 0 3210 35TH AVE NE NAPLES LLC 1827 SW 21ST FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33315 --- 0 ABLCONTRACTOR CORP 1840 NW 16TH ST MIAMI, FL 33125 --- 0 ACOSTA, ERNESTO ANTONIO 2644 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ACOSTA,CARLOS J JAZMIN MOLINA-ACOSTA 2565 37TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ADDERLEY, FRANKLIN C 525 NW 15TH WAY FT LAUDERDALE, FL. 33311 --- 884 AGUILAR, ISABEL 9055 NW 147TH TER HIALEAH, FL 33018--- 7304 AIME, DAVILES BIEN ROSELINE PETIT FRERE 3352 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 0918/09 t90 AJaAV 09Ac algpedwoo wru L9 x ww gZ tewlot ap atlanb113 091L0/09t9© J(JaAV gtlm algltl?dwoo ,,8/9 Z X „I. azls lapel 2013 FUSCO FAMILY TRUST i I 2052 HAMLIN STREET NAPLES, FL 34120---0 ii I 2545 37TH AVE NE LAND TRUST 720 GOODLETTE RD N # 304 NAPLES, FL 34102---0 ii 3E ONTIME INVESTMENT CORP (" 4430 EVERGLADES BLVD N i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I �I l ABREU MENDOZA, ALIX ALTAGRACIA DEVALERIO 2715 37TH AVE NE � NAPLES, FL 34120---0 it ACOSTA, GEORGETTE DIAZ i JASIELSUAREZ 3440 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ADAMIK, PETER LUDMILA KREK 10333 HERITAGE BAY BLVD #1712 i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i 22WEI 2395 HEYDON CIRCLE LAND TRUST PO BOX 501 r IMMOKALEE, FL 34143 --- 0 c 2925 35TH AVE NE LAND TRUST 12771 WORLD PLAZA LN #1-A FORT MYERS, FL 33907---0 ABASCAL,ARTURO A ALINA ABASCAL 408 W 16TH ST HIALEAH, FL 33010---2958 ACG HOME SERVICE LLC 2845 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120---0 ACOSTA, JULISSA 26 DEPAN AVE FLORAL PARK, NY 11001 --- 0 ADAMS, JIMMY & BRENDA 1228 SANE RD SE DALTON, GA 30721---5636 r ADIR, MARYLEXIS ADRIEL CORP 3565 29TH AVE NE ( 1895 NE 198TH TER 7 ! NAPLES, FL 34120--- 2822 i I NORTH MIAMI BEAC, FL 33179--- 3118 I I ! ,I ... _.. .. .._. AHO, DONALD L A]MARO, JASON A & DANA L i 1660 HOFFMAN RD #314 3290 27TH AVE NE GREEN BAY, WI 54311 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1564 I it I, it ALAG 2450 LLC i 2777 12TH ST N NAPLES, FL 34103---0 i II i ALANIZ, ARGENTINO A ALBINO TR, FRANCINE M FABIOLA ALANIZ FRANCINE M ALBINO L/R/TRUST I 1601 $W 63RD TER I i UTD 09/15/98 i NORTH LAUDERDALE, FL 33068--- 4445 9821 CONNECTICUT ST BONITASPRINGS, FL 34135 --- 0 , ,I label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery °5160/8160 Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery ®5160/8160 ALANIS, JESUS R ANNA LTREVINO 2101 FAIRMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ALBRIGHT, JACOB S DONNA M HUNTLEY 2425 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7403 Packet Pg. 9 47 ALENS, SANDRA M 2779 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1768 ALFONSO, LOSE CARABALLO ODALYS ALFONSO PEREZ 2407 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ALMAGUER BATISTA, ALCIDES 2585 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ALONSO, JOSEPH & MICHELLE 2645 37TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7492 ALONSO, WILLIAM 3280 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ALTUHOV, BENJAMIN & MARIA 2970 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 341.20 --- 0 ALVARADO, ANA ALEX PINTO KEVIN ALEXIS PINTO 387133RD AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ALVAREZ, COSME D & MARIA 1 2840 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7414 ALVAREZ, JUAN ALBERTO JUAN CARLOS ALVAREZ 559E 20TH ST HIALEAH, FL 33013--- 4138 ALEES, DENISE 1111 SW 1 AVENUE #1514 MIAMI, FL 33130 --- 0 0914/0915o AJaAV oaAe algpedwoo ww Lg x ww gZ }ewJot ap a1100111 091E/09190 AJaAV UtIM algltedwoo „g/g Z X „ L azls logel ALFANO, DANIEL &THERESA i 726 AVENUE BROOKLYN, NY 11223--- 3340 I•!I ALFONSO, JUAN CARLOS MENDEZ i 2975 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FLU 34120 --- 0 lid I� ALMANZA, ALFREDO & SANJUANA i 2181 14TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---5451 1 I !I •I 9.A.4.c ALFARO, ZULLIMA JOSE H ALFARO r 3240 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3203 ALFONSO, LAZARO M MABEL LAGO 2342 HEYDON CIR E NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ALONSO, GUILLERMO 3210 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120--- 2823 j ALONSO, LUISJ ALONSO, RODNEY 3740 NW 13TH ST f JUANA RAQUEL GUTIERREZ BARRERA MIAMI, FL 33126---2623 ! i 1872 54TH TER SW i !I NAPLES, FL 34116 --- 0 ALSLIMAN, MOHAMMAD ALTMAN, ROBERT A & MELINDA L IN249 BLOOMINGDALE RD 1 ; ! 2420 39TH AVE NE CAROL STREAM IL 60188--- 2817 I : NAPLES, FL 34120=--7402 ALUSMA, CLAUDETTE & WILSON 2018 FAIRMONT LN i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I! i ALVAREZ, ANAIS 2775 29TH AVE NE i NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7413 ; i ! !I! ALVAREZ,IDAEL 1'( ! 3640 24TH AVE SE NAPLES, FL 34117---0 , j , ALVAREZ, JUAN ALBERTO i JUAN CARLOS ALVAREZ ! 550 E 20TH ST HIALEAH, FL 33013--- 4138 AMAYA, ERNESTO RODRIGUEZ 2340 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/81,60 Etiabette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 05160/8160 ALVARADO JR, ALPHONSO 278124TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ALVAREZ, ANDY VANESSA DIAZ 3245 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ALVAREZ, JOSE PEREZ ISABEL HERNANDEZ 282137TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ALVAREZ, LUBIA 3540 33RD AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 AMAYA, SANTOS V 2665 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120----1406 Packet Pg. 995 AJaAV 39AB a i 0918/09 Leo, Iq.ledwoo ww �g x ww 9Z JewJoJ ap attan,blJ3 9.A.4.c 09G8/09 tgo AIDAV LIJIM alglJedwoo „ g/g Z x „t azls lagel AMERINE, BRITTANY i AMEY, JENNIFER AMEY, SCOTT ALAN DWAYNE WIERCINSKI i 3440 29TH AVE NE MARIE MONDE AMEY r 1928 WELLINGTON ST NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1586 I 2473 HEYDON CIR E NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 0 E AMIOT, WILLIAM E i AMMERMAN, RACHEL ANDERSON, ROBERTA v 3105 RED FOX RUN I 2725 41ST AVE NE I NANCY JANE ANDERSON 3 KI.SSIMMEE, FL 34746--- 2739 i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I i I 2780 29TH AVE NE V ! , NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7412 = I i ANDERSON, TAMI MARIE l ANDRE, VALANCiA ( ANEETA SHAILESH LIVING TRUST J 2027 PARSON STREET I 2118 CLEMENTINE STREET I 3029 NEWPORT DR NAPLES, FL 34120--- 0 ; I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i SPRINGFIELD, IL 62702 --- 0 E I � ANNA M SAMMS REVOCABLE TRUST i i ANNONI, CATHERINE (' ARANGUREN, JUAN C HERNANDEZ Q 2114 SATSUMA LANE BARKLEY, ROBERTA I I CRISTINA ZAMORA d NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 17476 BRILL DR 3370 31ST AVE NE CLINTON TWP, MI 48035--- 2313 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 293004 c N ARCE, ADRIAN I i i ARCISZEWSKI, SCOTT ARENA, MICHAEL R O CARMEN SERRANO i 299135TH AVE NE I . I 1761LYSSA WAY N 0 2515 37TH AVE NE ! NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I STATEN ISLAND, NY 10312 --- 0 J NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7437 ; i a I „ � ARENHOLZ, JOSEPH E & HAZEL j ARGUEDAS, CLAUDIO R ORMENO } ARGUELLES, LEYDIER v CHRISTINE ARENHOLZ WESSELS ! 324S RANDALL BLVD 2027 SAGEBRUSH CI N 7132 FLAGSHIP DR NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 C CICERO, NY 13039--- 8712 C i N ARGUETA, FEDERICO & ROSE M } i ( ARIAS DEOLIVARES, EVANGELINA ( ARIAS, DAX OMAR PECHO i 2620 39TH AVE NE 2430 35TH AVE NE I ! ; I 5290 GOLDEN GATE PKWY N NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1403 NAPLES, FL 34116--0 c O l N ARIAS, DAX OMAR PECHO ARIZMENDI, MICHAEL & LYNDSEY ARREDONDO, R CARLOS GARCIA d 5290 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 2442 RANDALL BLVD I 3470 35TH AVE NE vJ NAPLES, FL 34116 --- 0 I,I III NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3572 I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ea 4 Ii') ARREGUIN, ANTONIO ARREGUIN, MIGUEL f ARREGUIN, RICARDO IL V j2925 37TH AVE NE KAREN VIRVIESCAS RUIZ 254124TH AVE NE V NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i 2130 CLEMENTINE ST j NAPLES, FL 34120 -3555 m NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 r �j x w ARRIETA, FRANCISCO ALVARADO ASTHAPPAN, JOSEPH P I ATHAS, JOHN; ANAACUNA , AMMINIKUTTY JOSEPH %NAPLES TRUST PROPERTY MGMT d 90 25TH AVE NW I i JIBEY ASTHAPPAN 6300 TRAIL BLVD E NAPLES, FL 34102--- 6010 i I 2224 DANCY ST i NAPLES, FL 34108--0 v NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/8100 _"3 V Etiabette de format 25 Imn x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 05160/8160 Packet Pg. 996 09 LS/09 L5© AJaAV crane algitedwoo wLu L9 x ww 9Z 1ewJo1 op attanb113 091L8/09L9.� AJaAV ullm a1g11edwoo ,,8/9 Z x „L azis lapel AUDETTE JR, ALBERT DAVID 2390 ORCHARD ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 AUST, MARGARET PO BOX 242 LAHASKA, PA 18931 --- 242 AVILA, GILBERTO TORO DAYRIS SOCARRAS 3315 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---2931 AVILES, JUAN R & ANA L 1232 CYPRESS WOODS DR NAPLES, FL 34103 --- 0 AYALA, PEDRO & ALMADELIA 3361 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 AZUA, ROGELIO & MAGDA ELENA 2725 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BAGLEY, JODY LYNN 2831 24TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3524 BALDWIN, NEIL PETRA JAECKI E-BALDW I N 8 WENDY LN WEST HARTFORD, CT 06117--- 2925 i BALON, DANIEL RODRIGUEZ MARILYN CRUZ VALIDO 2482 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BARACALDO, DANIEL 2226 HEYDON CIR W NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i I AUGUSTE, MIRIAM 1 3158 FOREST BREEZE WAY ST CLOUD, FL 34771 --- 0 'I I.I I; AUTUMN SOUTH LLC 5920 ENGLISH OAKS LN NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 9.A.4.c � F AURORA 14 LLC 2155 KHASIA PT NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 AVDYLLARI, BARDHYL 539 ERMA DR ! i SOMONAUK, IL 60552 --- 0 II I AVILES GARAY, FELIX A 2080 FAIRMONT LN iNAPLES, FL 34120--- 4573 1 AVILEZ, ALLAN & MELISSA i ( 3270 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 AYBAR, NELSON A & SANDY E ! 8094 DREAM CATCHER CIR j I I! 3106 NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 I' 'I AVILES, FLOR A MORALES DIOGENES ARRIETA 3335 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120--0 AVRAMIS, ANA MARIE JESSICA M HEMENWAY 8766 CAVANO ST E NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 A'ZCUY, ELEYMIS 2475 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3573 f BAADER, FRANK BABINEAU, MARK STEVEN & TRACY 1 3256 33RD AVE NE 337 JASEMINE RD NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1560 ! ST AUGUSTINE, FL 32086 --- 0 li BAIJU, AUSTINE MATHEW POOVAN 12341 SW 1 STREET CORAL SPRINGS, FL 33071---0 II it BALLARD, DOUGLAS R &THERESA M 2266 HEYDON CIR W NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4584 i i i i BALASA, ALEXANDRU OLGAIBALASA 3570 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BALMACEDA, MARIA 550 SW 115TH AVE UNIT 904E MIAMI, FL 33174 --- 0 BANOS, YORKY LINARES i BANUELOS, LEOBARDO IRAIMY GARCIA BORROTO 2497 29TH AVE NE 371135TH AVE NE ! NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7553 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i t Il BARACK, GEORGEJ j JANICE NIXON ! I KAREN M LAPOINT 4515 BRUENING DR PARMA, OH 44134 --- 0 I I I 11 �i label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/81,60 bigbette de format 25 mm x 67 nim compatible avec Avery 05160/8160 BARATTA, GEORGE & LAURA 1890 ALAMEDA DR NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 Packet Pg. 997 09t9/09G5o Ai1aAd oane algitetlua03 ww L9 x UJW gZ teu»o} ap 9110np113 09'13/09G50ISJaAV gtlm algi;edWoo „8/9 Z x „4 azis logel I BARBARA F JONES TRUST ! ( BARBARA, ACDEL I 3000 COUNTY BARN RD I i KARINA VILLARREAL NAPLES, FL 34112--- 5438 262139TH AVE NE j NAPLES, FL 34120---0 I ! BARKES, DEBRA A JAMES M CARTER 5690 TAYLOR RD HARTSVILLE, IN 47224 --- 0 BARRERA, OSCAR DE JESUS BELLO TANIA ROLDAN SANTIESTEBAN 2675 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BARROSO,BARBARO G ANA MARIA LIRIANO 3935 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120--- 2928 BASSANO, JOHN & JOSEPHINE 2120 PARSON ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BATISTA, PETER & MIREYA .20504 SW 127TH PL MIAMI, FL 33177--- 5104 BAUTISTA, VERONICA RAIVIREZ 2865 37TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7433 ( BEAUDOIN, ALEXANDRA NICHOLAS METAYER 89 GOVE ST MANCHESTER, NH 03102---0 BEDOYA, MAURICIO A JULIANA A OROZCO 2460 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BELANGER, KENNETH RICHARD LYNN ANN BELANGER 1908 WELLINGTON ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 TMI-L-2--i BARLATIER, ALOURDES EVANSTE PIERRE 2584 41ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BARRIOS, TATIANA BEATRIZ RAMOS 3230 37TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BARTE, MELA MARK EDWARD BLAKEMORE 2226 VERMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MIWEI BARBOSA, AMELIDA & EDMUNDO 89121ST ST SW r NAPLES, FL 34117---4163 c BARRERA,LAURA SAYONARA GUSTAVO HUMBERTO PERILLA 2696 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BARRON, THOMAS A & ROANNE 180 LISA LANE OLDSMAR, FL 34677 --- 0 BARTON, D R PO BOX 105 EVERGLADES CITY, FL 34139 --- 105 BASTIDAS, FERNAND0 I BATISTAJR, PAULOI & NANCY S TATIANA ZAYAS 101 FAWN LAKE DR i 2087 VERMONT LN DINGMANS FERRY, PA 18328--- 4136 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 1 I BATISTA, RAMON i BAUTISTA, AMANDA I ALINA CASTELLANOS I 1948 WELLINGTON STREET 3470 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i BEAMAN, MARK D l BEATTY,THOMASJAMES i MARY ELLEN MILLS• i I SHANNON MARIE BEATTY 2065 MANDARIN LN i ` 2435 37TH AVE NE I I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4555 ! ! NAPLES, FL 34120---0 BEAUMONT, PAUL G & CLEOFINA M I i BECKER, RICHARD & VALERIE 2961 24TH AVE NE ! 7155 LIVE OAK DR ! I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3545 I NAPLES, FL 34114 --- 0 i ! BEDOYA-PENA, LUIS FERNANDO I BEKICH, ANDREW M & CIERRA 1846 ALAMEDA DR ( 2029 FAIRMONT LN ! I I, I! NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i ! I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I BELCHER, WILLIAM I BELL, MITCH ELL N VICTORIA GILLUM 803 E 1ST AVE 2450 HEYDON CIR E NEW SMYRNA BEACH, FL 32169 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I�'I III label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/8100 Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mrn compatible avec Avery 0'5160/8160 Packet Pg. 9 8771 09t8/09tyo AJaAV oane apledw00 ww L9 x ww 9Z teiwot ap attan'blta 0q:l.q/09 t5o Aj9AV calm algltedwoo „9/9 Z x «t azls lagel BELOSHKURENKO, NAUM & INNA BENAVIDES, FERNANDO 2219 DANCY ST ! RENATA DOROTA BENAVIDES NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 2264 DANCY ST I NAPLES. FL 34120 BENITEZ, CARLOS IVAN COLLAZO KARLA ROSUAN GOMEZ MALDONADO 2407 HEYDON CIR E NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BERRY, CHRISTOPHER W KONRD M BERRY 4327 SW 125TH LN 4327 MIRAMAR, FL 33027--- 6013 BETANCOURT, JAVIER ANDRES 27816TH AVE SE NAPLES, FL 34117 --- 0 BICKEL, PHILLIP SHIRLEY MARIE BICKEL 2445 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7403 BIEGEL, JACQUELINE 681 CAMBRIDGE RD PARAMUS, NJ 07652--- 4223 BIRD, GREGORY M & COLEEN M 2313 TANGERINE LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BLACKFORD, ORAL & NADIEN 2040 HAMLIN ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BLANCHETTE, MYCHAEL & SHARON 2057 FAIRMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BLANKENSHIP, CHAD MYCHAEL LAUREN WILSON BLANKENSHIP 2259 DANCY ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BERENS, ROSS ALAN 2382 ORCHARD ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BERTEMATTI, ANDRES A & MARKIA 9721 SW 32ND ST MIAMI, FL 33165--- 3027 BETANCOURT, VIANEY 29223 LEGENDS PLACE DR SPRING, TX 77386 --- 0 BIDAJOSEPH, ELMO 2017 FAIRMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 III II III I I I t, I' i f� i J' i I i I �I it BIGICA, MICHAELA & ANNETTE M i \ 2785 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i 0- cfw-4.D BENIMADHO, ARMAND PHARMASING 11221 NW 46TH LN r DORAL, FL 33178--- 4349 BERGER, DANNY & ALEXANDRA 2051 SAGEBRUSH CIR NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BESSE, RICHARD L & BRIDGET 144 ROYAL PALM DR STE 218 MARCO ISLAND, FL 34145--- 2010 BEVARS, JANICE R GARY ATKINSON 2725 37TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---7458 BIDDLE, KEVIN & LISA 2081 SATSUMA LANE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BILARDELLO, DANN J 2590 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120--- 5560 I� 1 , BLACK BURN, DONNA L ; BLACKFORD, BURCHELL & KERRYANN 3730 33RD AVE NE ; ( 1956 PARSON STREET NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 466 I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i� II I I I I BLACKWOOD, MAUVA ELAINE NEREKAJ GORDON i j 2243 VERMONT LANE i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I l! !i �I III BLANCO, MILAGROS I i 1987 FAIRMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i 1 I�i it 1 III J! II I i BLOCKER EST, BRUCE 1 DEAN M BLOCKERPR j 1303 NEW MARKET RD W IMMOKALEE, FL 34142--- 2253 label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/811160 Etiauette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible aver Avery 05160/8160 BLAIR, MARK A 2433 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120---3573 BLANDON, BENITO 2041 FAIRMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4574 BLONDO, ALFREDO MIRELLA SERINO 3430 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 3 E O U t t V C i d t 7 J 7 C ev E W a a 0 N N O O . O 0 N O N J 0 Ln ao r- N c' O" .N O ' N N 0 0 0 0 N 0 N J al. L d m V IL V V m s k W C,. d E v QI Packet Pg. 999771 09 [9/09 tg© AjeAV oane a1g1-edwoo ww L9 x ww gZ lewlol op 91lanb113 0918/09 [90 AJaAV ul1M alglladwoo „9/9 z x „t azls lagel BLOOM, JAMES S BLUME, STEPHEN L 6072 POLLY AVE i 2820 39TH AVE NE i NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 f NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 �I BOBAY, JEFFREY D & STEPHANIE M 2076 SAGEBRUSH CIR NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4568 BOERO, LEYSITH 349131ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BONACCI, ANTHONY & ELLEN 2223 VERMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BORCHERS, JOHN &JACQUELINE 3635 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1512 BOTERO,JUAN LINA ALMANSA 14 BOGARDUS PL #2S NEW YORK, NY 10040 --- 0 BOWLING, LAURA L 2820 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3576 BRANCATO, VINCENT 2075 PARSON STREET NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BRAZIL FL CONSTRUCTION LLC 1456 SE 14TH TERR CAPE CORAL, FL 33990 --- 0 BRIMMER, LOGAN JON EATON NICOLE BRIMMER 3385 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BOBOESCU, ION & LAVINIA C 2279 HEYDON CIR W NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4585 BOHM, SCOTT SHELLY MUSIEL 2370 HEYDON CIRCLE E NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BONILLA, MIGUEL ANGEL BOLANOS DIANA MARCELA ESPITIA ROSERO 1968 PARSON ST NAPLES, FL 34105 --- 0 BORGES, MANFRED & DONNA 9641 CAMPBELL CIR NAPLES, FL 34109--- 4506 BOWEN, CLIFTON ONEIL NEREKA JADE GORDON 2145 CLEMENTINE ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BOWMAN, CHRISTOPHER D MICHEALE BOWMAN 2091 SAGEBRUSH CIR NAPLES, FL 34120---4569 BRASSE FAMILY LIVING TRUST 2310 TANGERINE LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BRENNAN, GEORGE G & MARTHAJ 1955 FAIRMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4572 0-1-ot�E' BOBAK, MICHAEL FLEET LINDSEY MICHELLE BOBAK r 1983 FAIRMONT LN 3 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i t BOCK, CHRISTOPHER & ELIZABETH 2620 41ST AVE NE i i NAPLES, FL 34120--- 2802 i i 1 BOLLTTR, ROBERTO % ORANGETREE ASSOCIATES PO BOX 855 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34133 --- 0 BONIN, CHRISTINA L 67 MOUNTAIN HILL ROAD GROVESNORDALE, CT 06255 --- 0 Ii l BORZILLERI, CINDY L 2096 HAM LIN ST i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BOWERS, JOY LYNN i 2322 HEYDON CIR W i NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4586 i� } BOYD,BECKYJ I ! 2113 CLEMENTINE STREET I ' NAPLES, FL 34120---0 BRAVO, CARLOS R & ROSE M 3326 FLAGLER AVE I i KEY WEST, FL 33040 --- 0 1 ! BRETOS, TOMAS D & EULALIA C 1220 SW 143RD AVE ,I i MIAMI, FL 33184--- 3204 BRISC, IOAN & CORNELIA 912 N GIBERT CT iRIDGEFIELD, WA 98642 --- 0 i label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/8160 Ftiniiotta dA fnrmit 95 min x R7 mm onninatihle aver, Avery 66160/8160 BROMLEY, WILLIAM EARLE 2110 CLEMENTINE STREET NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 Packet Pg. 1000 BROWN, AUDREY 4010 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120--- 2901 BROWN, TISSAN YOLANDA 2920 NW 56TH AVE APT B411 LAUDERHILL, FL 33313---0 BRYAN W PAUL FAMILY LTD PTNSH PO BOX 2357 LABELLE, FL 33975---2357 BUCCI, JOSEPH H & LOUANN 2477 ALYDAR DR WEXFORD, PA 15090 --- 0 BUENTELLO, DANIEL SIMON ISABELLE BUENTELLO 2117 CLEMENTINE STREET NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BURKETT, GRACIELA GRIMALDA JAMES WENDELL BURKETTJR 2461 HEYDON CIR E NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 0911E/09[go AJaAV oane 9igitedwo0 ww Zg x ww 9Z tewJot ap attanbiq 091.9/09190 /JaAV qj!m 9igitedw0o „2/9 Z x „1 azis iagei BROWN, ROBERT ANDREW 419 WESTSIDE BLVD j CATONSVILLE, MD 21228--- 4062 i I'I l I BRUCKER LIVING TRUST 1 1980 PARSON ST I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I li I� p I BRYANT, BENJAMIN ISAIAH i BARINA MARQUET BRYANT 2835 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 it l BUCHILLON, JORGE A & ELIA L 14970 SW 75TH TER 1 MIAMI FL 33193--- 2395 I i !; III I li I BUSSARD, DANIEL A & AMANDA D 2995 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 CABALLERO, CYNTHIA 12144 BEAVERWOOD PL WOODBRIDGE, VA 22192---1403 CACHO, DANILO C & CATHERINE R 2485 OIL WELL RD NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1472 CAIRAMPOMA, EDWIN & LUZMILA 2039 PARSON ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BUNGARD, BRADLEYJAMES l': I CHYNNA MARIE BUNGARD 2359 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BURKM, ROMONA & TIMOTHY 2071 SAGEBRUSH CIR NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4569 BUTERA, ANTHONY & MARY P 4594 HIDDEN HOLLOW ROAD HAMBURG, NY 14075---0 CABRERA, ANA D 79 SUMMER ST SALEM, MA 01970--- 3044 CADAVID,ALEJANDRO JASON JIMENEZ 5201 RISING COMET LANE LAKE WORTH, FL 33463 --- 0 CALCIANO, MICHAEL D I DANIELA S CALCIANO 3685 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I I label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/81.60 Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery O5160/8160 BROWN, ROBERT L & DORIS J 2037 MANDARIN LANE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BRUNA, JUAN M & BLANCA JUAN C BRUNA ANGELA M BRUNA 860 E 38TH ST HIALEAH, FL 33013--- 2827 BT INVESTMENTS 01 LLC 2400 OIL WELL RD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BUCHMAN, JEREMY & CHANTEL 2107 SAGEBRUSH CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BUONANTUONO, DOMINICK C ELLEN M BUONANTUONO 2290 HEYDON CIRCLE W NAPLES, FL 34120---0 BURTON, RAE ANN 2530 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 435 BUTLER, NANCY LYN STEPHEN LEROY BUTLER 2092 PARSON ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 CACHARES, DAVID & LINNETTE 2061 HAMLIN ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 CAFFREY SR, LEWIS J & MARLENE 2298 HEYDON CIR W NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4584 CALDERON, LOSE L MARIA X ROMERO 2068 SAGEBRUSH CIR NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 Packet Pg. 1001 0912/09G5©,OaAV oane aiglaedwoo ww L9 x ww 9Z tewlol op 911anb113 09 G8/09L9© i(1aAV Ililnn algl;edwoo „g/9 Z x „G azls lagel i CALDWELL, JEREMIAH : ; CALLUE, WINSTON R 2438 HEYDON CIRCLE E I 5555 MORNING CREEK CIR NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i ATLANTA, GA 30349 --- 0 li CALZADILLA, A LEONEL CARRILLO I CAMACHO, ERICK YAMILEIDIS GARCIA LIRIANO YAIMA FINOL 3480 35TH AVE NE ; 3345 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 0 lil NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1587 CAMARGO, YANDY SANCHEZ I i CAMPOBASSO, GIOVANNI 2829 RANDALL BLVD j 1773 BIRDIE DR NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ,I III CANE, SEBASTIAN D ; ( CANEL, JACKENSON PIERRE 2817 31ST AVE NE I FRADNA SEPPE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4541 I 2941 EVERGLADES BLVD N II NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 CAPITAL HOMES INVEST & ALL LLC i i' CAPITAL HOMES INVEST & ALL LLC 321110TH AVE NE I 3211 LOTH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 �I NAPLES, FL 34129 --- 0 CARABALLO, SIOMALY OTERO t _ CARBALLO JR, ORLANDO & YENEISY JAIME R SOTO GONZALEZ 2625 RANDALL BLVD 2219 VERMONT LN I I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 5566 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ii i! CARBALLO, ORLANDO & GLADYS CARCAMO, SERGIO & FRANCIS A 2635 RANDALL BLVD 2620 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 5566 I I I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7408 CARDENAS, JESUS A } ! + CARDONA, ELIZABETH 3165 27TH AVE NE ; i 2338 HEYDON CIR E NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1523 I i) NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 CARLYLE, KEVIN TRICIA YOUMANS 4566 N LAKE DR SARASOTA, FL 34232 --- 0 CARRASCO, DAYSI VICTOR RENE BARRAGAN PEREZ 1935 WELLINGTON ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 0 uv 2twd 9.A.4.c k- - CALVO, JORGE A JEANNETTE CALVO r 4703 S LISBON CT E AURORA, CO 80015 --- 0 i CAMAN, PEGUY M & ANNE REGINE 2209 HEYDON CIR W NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i j CANCINO, MAYKOL (BRAIN LOPEZ ANA M CANCINO SANCHEZ 3330 RANDALL BLVD i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 CAPITAL HOMES INVEST & ALL LLC 3211 10TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 CAPOBIANCO,JOHN VINCENT JENNIFER LYNN CAPOBIANCO 2100 PARSON ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 CARBALLO, ORLANDO 2635 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120---5566 CARDENAS, ARTURO & WHITNEY 2248 DANCY ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 CARDOSA, MARCIO A MARICELA CARDOSO 2541 PICKARD LN NORTH PORT, FL 34286 --- 0 CARMICHAEL, MARY L & ROBERT A 2413 ORCHARD ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ' CARRAZANA, HUGO RAMON I i I ' RAQUEL CASTEDO ORTIZ i 2003 SAGEBRUSH CIR NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i l !Ij I'i label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery G5160/81%60 Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 05160/8160 CARMINE DIMEGLIO TRUST 1357 TRIANDRA LN NAPLES, FL 34119--- 3341 CARRERA,JANIRE 2016 SAGEBRUSH CIR NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4568 Packet Pg. 1002 CARRILLO, CONSTAIN 8104 SW 136TH PL MIAMI, FL 33183--- 4187 CARTAYA,RAFAELI 4280 31ST AVE N E NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 CARVAJAL JR, JORGE A LOURDES CARVAJAL 2765 37TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7458 CASTANO, ELIZABETH R 3680 33RD AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1588 CASTILLO TR, CARLOS L & BETTY CASTILLO LIVING TRUST UTD 01/04/06 16280 112TH DR N JUPITER, FL 33478 --- 0 CASTILLO, TARA LYNN & OMAR M 1960 PARSON STREET NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 CASTRO, GEORGEV 7211 MIRAMAR PKWY MIRAMAR, FL 33023---5932 CELIS, KAYLA & DAVID 2039 SAGEBRUSH CIR NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 CERVANTES, YAUMEL GLORYSELL FIORES 3234 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 CHACON, ENNOVY T MELGAREJO RAM A LOPEZ VELAZQUEZ 2477 HEYDON CIRCLE E NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 RAIM12., 0.-1-1 09 [8/09 NO AIGAV oaAe algltedwoo ww L9 x ww gZ tewJot ap attanblt3 09 i.8/09 [9@) AJaAV gpm algltadwoo „8/9 Z x «! azls label CARRILLO, HECTOR'L GUADARRAMA l ELVIRA MARTINEZ 2214 CARA CARA WAY NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 l CARTER, BRANDON W & RACHEL B 2072 SAGEBRUSH CIR NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I ;I l CARVER DALE S BETH E CARVERTR 1 l 25620 W 75TH ST { SHAWNEE, KS 66227 --- 0 ' CASTE JR, CLARENCE R f KELLY A CASTEL 31 OLD SCHOOLHOUSE RD ! NEW CITY, NY 10956 --- 0 i I j CASTILLO, GABRIEL & MARIA I 5406 TRAMMEL ST �{ ! NAPLES, FL 34113--- 7863 ! I� .I I CASTILLO, WILFREDO ! 2390 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--7503 �I CEDENO, GUILLERMO HERNANDEZ IVETTE CALDERIN 4040 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 it CENTRO DEENSENANZAS PALABRA DE FE INC 922 SW 143RD AVE PEMBROKE PINES, FL 33027 --- 0 i i� CESAR, MARIE L 242131ST AVE NE ! i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i .I CHADWELL, EDWARD A & NELLY G �!I 2034 FAIRMONT LN msw4.D CARRINGER, JENNIFER N & MARK A 2153 FAIRMONT LN r NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4576 CARTER, KENNETH BRIAN TRACEY JEAN CARTER 2405 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 CASASIERRA REALTY LLC 5800 PINE TREE RD PARKLAND, FL 33067 --- 0 CASTELLON,TERESA L YOLANDA BARRIOS 4318 CICADO WAY LAS VEGAS, NV 89121---0 CASTILLO, JOSE M &ANGELICA 3510 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 CASTRO REVOCABLE TRUST 5861 WAXMYRTLE WAY NAPLES, FL 34109 --- 0 CEKO, LOUI E & TANYA 2840 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 CEPEDA, ALI R VALBUENA DANYELA C SILVA 284137TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 CEVALLOS, FRANCISCO FABIAN ANYELITDADNEY RIANO RODRIIGUEZ 1988 PARSON STREET NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4573 ;I i label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/81;60 Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 06160/8160 CHAGNON, DARRELL P & DIANA L 3575 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1557 N c 0 2 0 N N 0 0 0 0 N 0 N J a; rn d V IL V V W c' d s' t� ! w Q Packet Pg. 1003 0919/09 G5o MOAV Dane alglaedwoo ww Lg x ww 9Z tewJot ap attanbt3 09L8/09190,tJaAV LItIM algltedwoo „g/g Z x„t azls lagel CHAMBERLAND, ROLANDJ CHAMBERS, MARIVIC CHANG, FREDERICK 2665 29TH AVE NE 2665 27TH AVE NE 2309 FEATHER BROOK LN r NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7409 NAPLES, FL 34120---0 i NAPLES, FL 34120---0 I�I II 3 it l E ! I 0 CHARLES, EMMANUELLA GUERRIER f CHARLES, GUERDA C j CHARWAY, GEORGE v 3264 33RD AVE NE 3210 BERMUDA ISLE CIR #1218 i 2141 FAIRMONT LN 3 NAPLES, FL 34120---0 I NAPLES, FL 34109 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120---0 V i I' I d CHASTAIN, RODNEY G CHAVARRIA, LUIS J & MAGALY T ( CHAVEZ, DEYSI J 3240 33RD AVE NE ' 2549 RANDALL BLVD ! GABRIEL CHAVEZ NAPLES, FL 34120 -1560 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 5577 2932 29TH AVE NE 7 i NAPLES, FL 34120---0 I I i ) W CHAVEZ, LAZARA ! CHEN - QIAN TRUST i i CHEN, WEI ' d ELIODORO CHAVEZ 13841 W 144TH ST ! ; RICKY E WRIGHT 2460 27TH AVE NE i I LEAWOOD, KS 66224 --- 0 ; 2360 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120- 0 I I NAPLES, FL 34120---0 II l N N CHERUBIN, BEAUCHAMP 1 CHICO, JIMMEY CHO, EDWIN c ALTAGRACE CHERUBIN 2070 MINNEOLA ST 741 W 17TH ST N 3875 EVERGLADES BLVD N I NAPLES, FL 34120---0 I HIALEAH, FL 33010--- 2416 J NAPLES, FL 34120---0 I a I ,i ICI p II l o CHURCH OF 1ESUS CHRIST OF CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF _J i CIOFFI, SALVATORE & LUSIA v LATTER-DAY SAINTS I ' LATTER -DAY -SAINTS ; ; 1664 65TH ST ^ N 50 EAST NORTH TEMPLE 22ND FLR 50 E NORTH TEMPLE ST BROOKLYN, NY 11204 --- 0 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101--0 I I 22ND FLOOR I; = 0 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84150 --- 1 II I _ CIRIGLIAND LIVING TRUST A CIRKSENA, JULIE ANN i CLARK, COURTNEY F 2182 CLEMENTINE ST ! I JENNIFER LEIGH ARON ! LISSETTE GARCIA p NAPLES, FL 34120---0 JAMES RICHARD NELSON I 3275 RANDALL BLVD N N 16330 BOSTON PKWY i NAPLES, FL 34120---0 O O I CLINE, IA 50325--- 4656 I I p N 04 CLARK, JAMES W & MARTHAT i ' CLARK, JAMES W & MARTHAT i i CLAUDIO, LAURA C d P A & WILMA S FONTAINE i P A & WILMA S FONTAINE IV 1999 FAIRMONT LN rn 1466 WHITE HALL PLACE 1466 WHITE HALL PLACE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 <a GASTONIA, NC 28056---0 GASTONIA, NC 28056 --- 0 d ea CLEMENTE, TITO A & MARIA E CLEMMONS, JAKE & STACY CLINE, AARON & STACEY d V 6420 SW 108TH PL ; I 1987 PARSON ST 2446 HEYDON CIR E V MIAM1, FL 33173--- 2062 I NAPLES, FL 34120---0 i NAPLES, FL 34120---0 ' l{ m III i s K COHEN, ORLANDO I ; _ COHEN, PATRICIA A ; COLLIER CNTY LLI DIANA FIGUEROA VEGA JAMES C COHEN I 3335 TAMIAMI TRL E _ DAVID SALOMON COHEN 2650 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34112 0 3645 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3695 ! t NAPLES, FL 34120 0 ;�I a label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/8160 bigbette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 95160/8160 ;� Packet Pg. 1 4 0919/09150 AJany naAe alggedwoo ww L9 x ww 5Z lewaot op altanbll3 0918/09 t9©AjaAV gjjm alglledwoo „S/5 Z x ,, l azls label 9.A.4.c COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 f COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 i COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 j NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 li COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 I' COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 Tot i ! COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 ! i NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 1 ( COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112--0 1 ! COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT j i I 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 ! ! ICI NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 l COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT i 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 I COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 ! ! i NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 !i 1 ! COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT ! 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 is �!I NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 ! COLLIER CNTY ! C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 i NAPLES, FL 34112--0 . I . ( COLLIER CNTY i C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E STE 101 i NAPLES, FL 34112---0 i I COLLIER CNTY j C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT ! I 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 I!l COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 I ! label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/ bigbette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible aver Avery i COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101. NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112--0 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 it COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 !I COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112--0 i 31'60 05160/8160 r c 3 E E 0 U t i t U C i d t 7 J 7 C ev W Q a 0 N N O O O 0 N O N J a o' L 00 I - cm c' 0' N of N i N O O 0 0 N O N J <a ai ♦U♦♦ i V ! m W d i E t v a Packet Pg. 1 571 091.0/09L 16 A19AV 0100 olgljedwoo ww L9 x ww gZ }ewaot op 911anblt3 0918/09t9o,4a9Ad LItIM algl}edwoo „8/9 Z x „( azls Iagel COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY - - TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S NAPLES, FL 34104 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S NAPLES, FL 34104 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S NAPLES, FL 34104 --- 0 COLLIER COUNTY 3335 TAMIAMI TRAIL E STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER COUNTY 3335 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 9.A.4.c COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT r 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 E NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY COLLIER CNTY WATER/SEWER DIST 3301 TAMIAMI TRL E NAPLES, FL 34112--- 4961 COLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S NAPLES, FL 34104 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S NAPLES, FL 34104 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S NAPLES, FL 34104---0 I i—COLLIERCOUNTY ! 3335 TAMIAMI TRAIL E STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 COLLIER COUNTY I 3335 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST ` NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 I: I: label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/8160 Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 05160/8160 COLLIER CNTY I'I I ; C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 i COLLIER CNTY. C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 I f COLLIER CNTY I C/O REAL.PROPERTY MANAGEMENT I it 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 ; ' NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 I! COLLIER CNTY !I C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT I 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 i NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 i ! ' COLLIER CNTY I C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT I 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 ' i NAPLES, FL 34112--0 i COLLIER'CNTY _ •.. l TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY I 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE 5 ! NAPLES, FL 34104 --- 0 I ' COLLIER CNTY l ` ' TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY I ! 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S i NAPLES, FL 34104 --- 0 Yl I COLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY j I 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S NAPLES FL 34104---0 COLLIER COUNTY 3335 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER COUNTY 3335 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 E O U t t U C i d t 7 J 7 C ev E E W Q a 0 N N O O O 0 N O N J a 0 Ln 00 I- N Packet Pg. 1006 0918/09150 AJaAV Dane algltedwoo ww Zg x ww gZ tewJDi op attanbII3 0918/09t9� /,JanV gtun aigltedwoD „g/g Z x „t azls lapel COLLIER COUNTY COLLIER COUNTY f 3335 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST l 3335 TAMIAMI TRL E STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 j ' I NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 i COLLIER COUNTY i i COLLIER SOIL AND WATER } i 3335 TAMIAMIATRL E STE 101 f CONSERVATION DISTRICT I i NAPLES, FL 34112---0 i 147001MMOKALEE RD i NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1468 COLLINS EST, DOROTHY M ; i COLLINS, HOMER M C/O P L COLLINS JENSEN PR ! I % DAVE COLLINS 1322 JOHNS BLVD 12749 S HAGAN CT RAYMORE, MO 64083 --- 0 i OLATHE, K5 66062---0 CONGINE JR, VITO 1 &TRUDY L i j\ CONGINE, BETTY M 1 2894 31ST AVE NE ` BETTIE J SYKES NAPLES, FL 34120---4476 i VITOJ CONGINEJR TRUDY L CONGINE I; i 2894 31ST AVE NE i I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 4476 i .I CONNOLLY SR, WALTER PAUL '' ( CONTRERAS, SERGIO ROSEMARY CONNOLLY { JEANETTA G CONTRERAS ' 2262 VERMONT LANE l 2833 37TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ' i NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7433 i COOPER, SAMUELTERRANCE i COPPLAJR, HAROLD T & PAT 3470 33RD AVE NE ! ! 2054 MANDARIN LN NAPLES, FL 34120--0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4554 Ii) 1!I Iil CORDERO, HECTOR & NIRKA ( CORD OVES, ERIC 4685 7TH SW f ELIZA HERNANDEZ I WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33409 --- 0 2008 SAGEBRUSH CIR i i NAPLES, FL 34120---0 i i ! CORONA, JOSE R 1 i CORRALES, WILSON FREDY 2715 41ST AVE NE ! i GLORIA IRENE CORRALES I If NAPLES, FL 34120--- 2801 2274 HEYDON CIR W �l NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 l 'I CORREIA, KYLE L CORTES, STEM- ANIE & FERNANDO li 2865 RANDALL BLVD I ; 2181 FAIRMONT LN I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 5.590 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 51W4.D COLLIER COUNTY 3335 TAMIAMI TRL E STE 101 r NAPLES, FL 34112---0 COLLIER SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT 147001MMOKALEE RD NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1468 COLOME, ENELIDO A INGRID COLOME 1875 SW 22ND TER MIAMI, FL 33145--- 3821 CONIGLIARO, GIOVANNI 14629 BEAU FORT CIR NAPLES, FL 34119--- 4829 COOPER REVOCABLE TRUST 2045 MANDARIN LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 CORADO, BYRON RICARDO MUNOZ MAYTE CRYSTAL MUNOZ 2475 41ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 COSTA, JACINTO & ELISA COSTA, LUISA 1991 FAIRMONT LN j 326 WARREN ST FAIRMONT LN i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ! i NAPLES, FL 34120---0 I ; !'I I label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05'160/8160 I 5 Etiouette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 05160/8160 CORNEJO, JOHANNA CAROLINA JESUS E ZAPATA 2882 41ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 CORREA, YENNY V MIGUEL MONTES DELGADO 2680 37TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 COSIMANO, JOSEPH & LAUREN 3662 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 COUNTRY HOME LLC PO BOX 2407 MARCO ISLAND, FL 34145 --- 0 Packet Pg. 1007 COVENTRY, JAMES E CHRISTINE L COVENTRY 1967 FAIRMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 CRATO,JOSEPH S 2013 FAIRMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 CROCKETT, SONNY 2235 DANCY ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 CRUTCHFIELD, JEANNIE MARIE MICHAEL DEWAYNE CRUTCHFIELD 2604 41ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 CRUZ, LUISJ MARIA PEREIRA 6090 W 15TH CT HIALEAH, FL 33012--- 6202 09 [8/09[9© AJaAV oane algit2dwoo ww L9 x ww gZ lewloi ap allanbil] 0918/09I,go AJaAV ql!m alglledwoo „9/9 Z x „t azis lociel COX 11, THOMAS CHARLES i AMY JO COX 2152 FAIRMONT LN I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4575 CUBAS, LUIS GUILLERMO YOLANDA CORTIJO CUBAS 17011 N BAY RD APT 801 SUNNY ISLES BEAC, FL 33160--- 3633 CUETO, VICTOR & MAGALY 1028 W 67TH ST HIALEAH, FL 33012---6469 CUMANA, DANIEL & MARTA 9079 NW 121ST ST HIALEAH GARDENS, FL 33018--- 4172 CUSIDO, JUAN & ELSA 1217 NW 34 AVE MIAMI, FL 33125 --- 0 D GREENFIELD TRUST 3460 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1509 CRESPO, YADIEL SUAREZ ( CRISCIONE, JOHN & LINDA 2471 27TH AVE NE 2034 MANDARIN LN f ; I� NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i I if NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4554 CROUSHORE, TERRY A I CROUSHORE, TERRY A DIONAIKA CROUSHORE DIONAIKA M CROUSHORE 3230 27TH AVE NE 3230 27TH AVE NE i NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1564 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 r CRUZ, HECTOR I & IDALMIS 1 i ( CRUZ, JUAN 2565 35TH AVE NE I 560 E 58TH ST NAPLES, FL 34120---1404 ! � ! HIALEAH, FL 33013--- 1315 cI i CRUZ, MELISSA CHERENA i i CRUZ, SAUL ! NORBERTO SERRANO ORTIZ ALICIA MARLENE PONCE 2391 HEYDON CIR E 2049 MANDARIN LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ! NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4555 I'I CUELLAR, CARLOS E & MARLENE i i CUETO, VECTOR &MAGALY i 16851 SW 147TH CT 1028 W 67TH ST I MIAMI, FL 33187---0 ! HIALEAH, FL 33012--- 6469 1 ; ` CUEVAS, JACOB & LAURA } } r II CUEVAS, LILLIAN 1989 SAGEBRUSH CIR i I 2740 31ST AVE NE I i NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4567 1 { r NAPLES, FL 34120---4542 I I� CUNNINGHAM, BEVERLEY � !f CURBELO, JORGE L FLORES CARENE N CUNNINGHAM DONNA GINTER f ; I ANISLEIDY GUERRA VALDES 2980 35TH AVE NE 2760 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 0 i NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4542 l CUSTODIO, CHRISTIANNE KATE 1 : I CZYSZ FAMILY TRUST LEA CUSTODIO 2050 MANDARIN LN 2083 SAGEBRUSH CIR i NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4554 I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4569 i ! lil DALBY FAMILY TRUST �i I i DALBY FAMILY TRUST 9319 FIELDSTONE LN i i 9319 FIELDSTONE LN , NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I ` I • NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I'I I I label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 115160/81G0 Etiquette de format 25 nun x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 05160/8160 dmgA.E' COX, CHRISTOPHER WILLIAM AMANDA ANNE COX r 2228 DANCY ST E NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 3 1= Packet Pg. 1 871 091 R/0919®AJeAV aaAe algpedwoo ww L9 x ww 9Z lauJi0i Bp a11an.b!13 091 R/0915® AJanV g11M alglletlwoo „R/9 Z x „t ozls logel DALUSMA, DIEUJUSTE ° I DAMIO ENTERPRISE LLC 2145 FAIRMONT LN 27028 RUE DE PAIX NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4576 i BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135 - 0 DARCHEJR, PHILIP LEE JEAN ANN DARCHE 2211 VERMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 DAVIDSON, DONALD 2199 VERMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 DAYTON, LYNN E 2525 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1404 DE RENDON, PATRICIA G PRIMO 3027 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 DE SOUSA, QUINTINO C 2605 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1484 DEGENNARO, MATT 2585 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120--- 5577 DEL VALLE, MARCOS U 2672 31ST AVE N E NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 DELGADO, BELINDA 3610 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 DELGADO, TERESA 2685 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1406 DASCHKE, AMY 2035 SAGEBRUSH CIR NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4569 DAVILA, LUIS 3325 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 DE LAUFER ET AL, MARIA E F 9250 BELLEZA WAY #102 FORT MYERS, FL 33908 --- 0 DE SILVA, DIONNIE PARCHMENT 20011 SW 83RD AVE CUTLER BAY, FL 33189--- 2010 DE ZAYAS, FIDEL GOMEZ D CAROLINA SOLANO ESCOBAR 2002 FAIRMONT LANE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 DEJESUS, SATURNINO 1952 WELLINGTON STREET NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I i i I� -I� I I'. DELINOIS, TED 2117 FAIRMONT LN I NAPLES FL 34120 --- 0 I!I � it label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/81;60 etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 05160/8160 dd�A.4.D DANIEL, DONALD LEE &JEAN M LINDSAY R MILLER 2153 CLEMENTINE ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 DAVID & SHERYL ANDERSON TRUST 253 GALWAY DRIVE CARY, IL 60013 --- 0 DAVIS, KENNETH R &JOYLETTY KENYAY DAVIS 1160 16TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3409 DE MOMBLACK, KELY DURAN 5337 BRIN WAY AVE MARIA, FL 34142 --- 0 DE SOUSA, QUINTINO 812 96TH AVE N NAPLES, FL 34108 --- 0 DE ZAYAS, FIDEL GOMEZ DIANA CAROLINA SOLANO ESCOBAR 2002 FAIRMONT LANE i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 DELANEY JR, RICHARD L EVELYN J DELANEY 2078 SATSUMA LN NAPLES, FL 34120--0 DELGADO, ILEANA D 3865 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1531 DEL SOL, JORGE LUIS GRANEY MOREJON PINO 3319 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 DELEON, DOUGLAS 3740 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---417 DELGADO, ROXANA 2990 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1582 DELLAPORTA, DONALD MARGARET A DELLAPORTA 2111 VERMONT LANE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 Packet Pg. 70091 DEMETRIOU, JOHN S 8593 WEBSTER HILLS ROAD DEXTER, MI 48130 --- 0 DEPIANO, NICOLA & ELENA 2030 MANDARIN LN NAPLES, FL 34120---0 DESSING, CAROL ALIAM R 244 OCEAN PALM DR FLAGLER BEACH, FL 32136 --- 411 DEVRI ES, TIMOTHY G & HELEN J 3591 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 DIAZ, LUCY JESUSESTRADA 3929 SW 60TH AVE MIAMI, FL 33155--- 5016 DIAZ, MILAGROS DE LA CARIDA 2420 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120---0. DIAZ, RICARDO & ALMA 2466 HEYDON CIR E NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 DICARLO, ANTHONY & GRACE 47 SAYBROOK STREET STATEN ISLAND, NY 10314 --- 0 09L8/09L5© AJaAV Dane alggedwoo Aw L9 x ww 9Z )ew101 ap a))anIb113 0914/09L90 A1aAV Lplm aigl)edwoo „9/9 Z x „L azls lapel DEMOREST, JAMES ANDREA FIRTH 2067 VERMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 DESHANO, ALAN D & ELIZABETH A 2162 CLEMENTINE ST ; I;INAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 t; t� l I DEVISSE, VIRGINIA 2472 27TH AVE NE 3 I ! NAPLES, FL 34120---0 I DEWS, THOMAS A BERNA OBRIEN ' 2109 CLEMENTINE STREET NAPLES, FL 34120---0 I I' I i DIAZ, MARCO LOPEZ i ? ALIETGAMEZDIAZ ; 2545 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ' ! ; t p DIAZ OSMELJ 3770 41ST AVE NE I ! r ! NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1534 I� DIGIROLAMO, DARYL KRISTOFER TORI DIGIRALAMO 2048 HAMLIN ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 DINNEEN, SILVIA MARCOS SANTOS REYES 2383 BEAR CREEK DR #204 NAPLES, FL 34109 --- 0 I; DIAZ, XIOMARA SOCARRAS 2846 EVERFGLADES BLVD N i ! ( NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 �I t t 1 DIEPPA, REINALDO & CARIDAD 640 E 10TH AVE ' HIALEAH, FL 33010--- 4642 DIMEGLIO, ANTHONY & ROSALIA l I 2157 CLEMENTINE ST ' NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I.I i i l ;) DOAN, JONATHAN ALLEN CODY GRAVES DOAN ! t 2238 VERMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120---0 =WE, DEMORETT, PHILLIP C & LAURIE A 2060 SAGE BRUSH CIRCLE r NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 c DESIR, MARIE 3260 37TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 DEVISSE, VIRGINIA 4312 MONTALVO CT NAPLES, FL 34109 --- 0 DIAZ, ALEXANDER GOYES 2972 37TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 DIAZ, MAVIS Y 2885 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120---0 DIAZ, RANDY JUNIOR A 2338 IMMOKALEE RD #309 NAPLES, FL 34110 --- 0 DIAZ-BARCELO, MARIA DEL C AMERICO SOLER 2064 HAMLIN STREET NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 DIETZ, PAUL 27730 WOODMONT ST ROSEVILLE, MI 48066---2728 DINELLO, ROSE ANN 2254 HEYDON CIR W NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 DOEHRING, LAMES R &JUDY A 7136 CURTIS DR DARDENNE PRAIRIE, MO 63368--- 9600 N c O W 0 N N . O 0 0 0 N O N J m �L V a V i m s k W CI d t v a label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/8160 Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 0'5160/8160 Packet Pg. 1010 09 G9/09 t4@ AJaAV aaAe alglfedwoo ww C9 x ww SZ fewJof op a8anblt9 09Q/09t9© AJaAV 411m algltedwoo „9/9 Z x „f azls iagel DOGER, PEDRO & MAYRA i DOMINGUEZ, JOSE MARIANO i 1441 SW 139TH AVE HOLLY LYN DOMINGUEZ I , MIAMI, FL 33184--- 2768 2340 ORCHARD ST j NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i I; DOMINIC, AJITH K �I ii. i DONALDSON, AARON ELIZABETH SAHAYAM AJITH KUMAR 2088 HAMLIN ST 3822 15T AVE SW i I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i NAPLES, FL 34117 --- 0 i ! DORCELIAN, LOUIS & ANGELENE ; I DORENE P PIERCEALL REV TRUST 244135TH AVE NE 2267 HEYDON CIRCLE W NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 i NAPLES, FL 34120---0 .li DORTAJR, RAMON & OLGA LIDIA 1 i ( DORVILUS, JEAN CLAUDE l 2970 39TH AVE NE 2012 SAGEBRUSH CIR ! NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7401 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4568 i DOUGHERTY, DALTON LEE DOUGLAS C ARMELLINO REV TRUST CIARA LUCILLE DOUGHERTY ADRIENNE J ARMELLINO REV TRUST 2842 41ST AVE NE 1 2081 HAMLIN ST NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1580 1 i NAPLES, FL 34120---0 DR HORTON INC _ ; / DREILING, DAN 10541 BEN C PRATT SIX MILE 1 i ( 4427 SE OAKVIEW LN ! CYPRESS PKWY #100 TOPEKA, KS 66609---0 FORT MYERS, FL 33966---0 ji DROP, JACOB ALEXANDER ( DSOUZA, MAXIMIAN KAROL VANESSA DROP ! I 2250 VERMONT LN 831 NW 84TH DR i NAPLES, FL 34120=--0 CORAL SPRINGS, FL 33071 --- 0 i DOMINGUEZ, SIXTO MIGUEL JADE ELIZABETH DOMINGUEZ r 3485 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 F DONALDSON, WILLIAM & BARDINA 15060 92ND CT N WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33412--- 2547 DUBIN, MICHAEL J & PAMELA P i I DUBOCK, RONALD GEORGE 2066 MINNEOLA ST i BROOKE ELIZABETH DUBOCK i NAPLES, FL 34120---0 j 1974 FAIRMONT LN i I ! NAPLES, FL 34120---0 DUBRAVA, LAWRENCE DUNCKLEY, JASON & LAURA 25 SORGHUM RD i 171 KIRKLAND DR SHELTON, CT 06484--- 5828 I ! NAPLES, FL 34110 --0 DUPREE, RTERRY DURAN, STEVE & IRIS AMANDA 108 CROSS CREEK BLVD 2469 HEYDON CIR E i PO BOX 238 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I TAMPA, FL 33647---0 label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/81,60 Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 0 5160/8160 UORGILE, CLOVINCE 3226 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 DOTY, CORY 2075 VERMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 DOUROUNTOUDAKIS, NICK 1515 146TH PL WHITESTONE, NY 11357--- 3020 DRISCOLL, NICOLE N 1978 FAIRMONT LANE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 DU CHEMIN, JOHN PETER JANET MARIE DU CHEMIN 2180 VERMONT LANE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 DUBON, ANTONIO MANUEL PO BOX 277526 MIRAMAR, FL 33027--- 7526 DUNN,CONOR CAROLINE C COVONE 3715 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 DWYER, JOY E 2218 HEYDON OR W. NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 Packet Pg. 1011 E S & P C PISANO REV LIV TRUST 3660 33RD AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1588 EBEID, MOHAMMAD HIYAM EBEID 368 76TH STREET BROOKLYN, NY 11209 --- 0 ECHEMENDIA, VICTOR 2774 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7412 ECKERTY, DONALD E MARQUITA ROSE ECKERTY 1992 PARSON ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 EDON INC 3210 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3229 ELIAS JR, FREDERICK J 1992SAGEBRUSH CI NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ELLAWISH LLC 7311 NW 12TH ST STE 20 MIAMI, FL 33126 --- 0 ELLOTT, LINFORD & DOROTHY 3470 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1509 EMILIA CASTRO TRUST 112114TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH OF NA INC 777 MOORING LINE DR NAPLES, FL 34102 --- 0 09 L8/09 L5® (UaAV aane alglladwoa ww �q x ww sZ lewJoj ap 91190113 09�9/09 Lg. AjoAV gilm aiglledwoo „8/9 Z x „L azis lagel i E&R HOUSING LLC i 6 DANCY ST 22 3 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 EBEID, MOHAMMAD HIYAM EBEID 368 76TH STREET BROOKLYN, NY 11209 --- 0 ECHEVERRIA, ARIEL AGUILA MARGARITA RODRIGUEZ GONZALEZ 3515 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 EDLUND, ROSS & NOREEN 220 HICKORY RD NAPLES, FL 34108--- 3312 EDWARDS, LINCOLN PAUL TERRATRUST LLC 1810 GLOVER ST REDLANDS, CA 92374 --- 0 ELIAS, ZONSOLES FELIPE ALEJANDRO PICO HERNANDEZ 3274 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--0 51WE1 EATMON III, JAMES DRIVER TARA LEIGHAN EATMON r 2210 VERMONT LN c NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 C EBEID, RENAN NAREMAN EBEID 359 GLENNEYRE CIR ST AUGUSTINE, FL 32092 --- 0 ECHOLS II, ROBERT M TEN ECIA A ECHOLS 2254 VERMONT LANE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 EDMONDS, WILLIAM & GERTRUDE 151 HADDE AVE CUMBERLAND, RI 02864--- 3542 EFFNER, JOHN E LUBA DRAHOSZ 2140 FAIRMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4575 ELKINS, OSCAR KENT & MARY ANN cm 2109 PARSON STREET NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 N C O W d ELLIOTT, LESTER & ERMA R 2320 37TH AVE NE ' i NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7542 i i ELMORE 11, LEE LARSON 272124TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I I I i EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL i LUTHERAN CHURCH 777 MOORING LINE DR NAPLES, FL 34102--- 4715 l EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL 1 l I I LUTHERAN CHURCH OF NA INC 777 MOORING LINE DR NAPLES, FL 34102 --- 0 I I I I i I :I label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/81.60 Etiohette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 06160/8160 ELLS, ANNETTE G 2475 37TH AVE NE o NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7452 c 0 0 0 N o: J EMERITA ASSOCIATED USA INC d ATTN DANA BEHAR rn 744 BROAD ST STE 406 W NEWARK, NJ 07102---3856 d 2 a, EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL V LUTHERAN CHURCH OF NA INC O 777 MOORING LINE DR ' NAPLES, FL 34102 --- 0 m . r W EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH OF NA INC 777 MOORING LINE DR NAPLES, FL 34102 --- 0 t v Q Packet Pg. 1012 0918/091.90 AJaAV oane algltedwoo ww L9 x ww 9Z tewjof op 91tanbI13 09'19/09190 AJaAV ylirvn algltedwoo „g/9 Z x „t ozls (agel EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL i 1 EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN i LUTHERAN CHURCH OF NA INC I I CHURCH OF NAPLES INC 777 MOORING LINE DR I 777 MOORING LINE DR NAPLES, FL 34102 --- 0 j NAPLES, FL 34102---4715 Ii EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN i EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN i CHURCH OF NAPLES INC i ; f CHURCH OF NAPLES INC 777 MOORING LINE DR I 777 MOORING LINE DR NAPLES, FL 34102---4715 NAPLES, FL 34102 4715 i EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN ICI EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH OF NAPLES INC CHURCH OF NAPLES INC 777 MOORING LINE DR 777 MOORING LINE DR NAPLES, FL 34102--- 4715 i NAPLES, FL 34102--- 4715 i EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN i EMY, FERNANDO (5 CHURCH OF NAPLES INC i 505 38TH ST i 777 MOORING LINE DR WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33407---0 NAPLES, FL 34102---4715 ' j! I� ENGEL, DONALD J ENSELL, RANDY I DONNA BERNSTEIN ENGEL ; 2690 27TH AVE NE 2344 ORCHARD STREET ; NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1483 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i i ;l EPLEY, JANICE E i EQUITY TRUST 1 2350 HEYDON CIRCLE E % SERGIO DE CESARE I NAPLES, FL 34120--0 ; PO BOX 1409 ! I i ELYRIA, OH 44036--- 1409 i 1 � 1 � ERDOS TR, THELMA M i ERVIN, CHRISTINA DATED 06/28/90 3280 41ST AVE NE 1480 FORD BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1501 LINCOLN, MI 48146 --- 0 i ESCOBAR-BARRIENTOS, LUIS F ESPARZA, JORGE ERNESTO CORTES i 3690 37TH AVE NE LUCIA BELEN SIERRA GUTIERREZ NAPLES, FL 34120---2807 2141 CLEMENTINE ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 II ESPINOSA, ERIC & DIXE ESPINOSA, HEIKEL 2096 FAIRMONT LN ( MILENA Y VILR LAUZAO NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i ` 2745 29TH AVE NE i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i 9.A.4.c EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH OF NAPLES INC 777 MOORING LINE DR NAPLES, FL 34102--- 4715 EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH OF NAPLES INC 777 MOORING LINE DR NAPLES, FL 34102--- 4715 EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH OF NAPLES INC 777 MOORING LINE DR NAPLES, FL 34102--- 4715 ENDICOTT, GARY L & CAM VAN V 25 COUNTRYSIDE DR ESSEX.IUNCTION, VT 65452 --- 0 ENTRUST GROUP THE FBO SUMOL NEDUMGOTTIL 55 12TH ST STE 900 OAKLAND, CA 94607 --- 0 ERCOLANI, JOSEPH P JOSEPH F ERCOLANI 6017 PINE RIDGE RD #70 NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 ESCOBAR, OSCAR L & DEBORA 2384 37TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7542 ESPINO, YOLANDA R 301 HUNTING LODGE DR MIAMI SPRINGS, FL 33166--- 5113 ESTATE MANAGEMENT INVEST INC 1 I I ESTEVEZ, LAZARO Y EBANKS i 4226 5TH VE SW I 2885 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 ! i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 z label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery O5160/8160 ` Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 111111 compatible avec Avery 05160/8160 ESQUIJAROSA, ANGEL 297124TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ESTRADA, FRANCISCO 3355 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, I'L 34120---0 Packet Pg. 1013 ETTER, TYLER SCOTT LAUREN MARYSE ETTER 2169 CLEMENTINE ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 EVEROIL LLC 613 CORBEL DR NAPLES, FL 34110--0 FADI LLC SUN 1318 CORP 2155 KHASIA PT NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 FALERO, DEYSI JORGE MARTINEZ 3225 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1565 FARINAS, VICTOR 9795 SW 114 ST MIAMI, FL 33176 --- 0 FAUNCE, SCOTT ANDREW 2222 VERMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 FEBLES, YONNIE FUNDORA CARIDAD SIERRA LEYVA 322124TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 09 L8/09 LGo AJaAV cane ajgjtedwoa LUw L9 x ww 9Z tewJot ap 9110nbjt3 09L8/09Lq@ AJaAV ytjna algjtedwoo „8/5 Z X „L azjs iagej EUBANKS, AARON R 2785 29TH AVE NE ' I ; NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7413 .I I� EVERY, RANDALL G & CAROL i 2397 HEYDON CIR E NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i • it l i FAIRMONT RESIDENTS ASSN INC - I %KEB MANAGEMENT 6017 PINE RIDGE RD #262 i NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 I� ,I :I FELIX SR, GERALD D MARIETHERESE LOUIS GERALD GERALD D FELIXJR SEAN FELIX l 21464 WHITEHALLTER l QUEENS VILLAGE, NY 11427---1829 FERGANG, SCOTT & BARBRA L 287.NORTH CENTRAL AVE RAMSEY, N1 07446 --- 0 FERNANDEZJR, FRANCISCO R YANELY FERNANDEZ 2930 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ' 51 F'AMULARE, EDWARD 1 & KATHLEEN 2970 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 FASCHING, SAMANTHA 3585 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 FAZIO, WENDYA 2940 37TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---1579 EVERETT FINANCIAL INC % SUPREME LENDINGDING 14801 QUORUM DR STE 300 DALLAS, TX 75254-7-0 FABBRI, FACUNDO 2236 DANCY ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 FAKHOURY, IBRAHIM A 2326 HEYDON CIR W NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4586 FAN FAN, GAMALIEL 3570 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4485 FAULKNEY, SUSAN A JOAN EDYTHE HARPRING 2298 VERMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 FEATHERSTONE, CAROLINA D 2550 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ' FEHR, LORI ANN & JAMES ANTHONY FELIX SR, GERALD D 2155 VERMONT LANE MARIE THERESE LOUIS . NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 GERALD D FELIX JR i SEAN FELIX i I 21464 WHITEHALL TER J QUEENS VILLAGE, NY 11427--- 1829 \ FERAN, JAMES 'i ; ; FERDOWSIEPOUR, GHOLAM 2430 29TH AVE NE NOOSHI SALEHI NAPLES FL 34120 --- 0 �I , 1312 NW 89TH TER PEMBROKE PINES, FL 33024--- 4639 iI FERIA, ARTHUR 3320 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1777 FERNANDEZ, AUGUSTO l I 3585 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1557 •� iI label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/810 [tigbette de format 25 mm x 67 nim compatible avec Avery 06160/8160 FERIA, ARTHUR &YANARA 3320 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1777 FERNANDEZ, EDENY 3015 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 Packet Pg. 1014 09 t8/09 G9@ AJany oane olgltedwoo ww L9 x ww 9Z tewlot up a}tanblt3 09L8/09190 Many LBIM Blglledwoo „9/9 -L x „G azls label FERNANDEZ, EDENY FERNANDEZ, ERIK C FERNANDEZ, ERWIN 3015 EVERGLADES BLVD N TERRATRUST LLC � 233 37TH AVE NW >+ = NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1575 13721 SW 13TH ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MIAMI, FL 33928 --- 0 it II E O FERNANDEZ, FRANCISCO E i FERNANDEZ, JULIO L & GINAKARNA i FERNANDEZ, LAZARO & YENEY D c� KITTY SHAMEE FERNANDEZ I i 3333 33RD AVE NE 3594 29TH AVE NE 3290 29TH AVE NE i I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1539 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 2821 V NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I iI C FERNANDEZ, MIRYAN I i I FERNANDEZ, RAUL M i ( FERNANDEZ, ROSA MARIAM J 13841 HEANEY AVE i 3360 35TH AVE NE DARREN TAYLOR ORLANDO, FL 32827 --- 0 ! ! NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1506 ( 2038 MANDARIN LN O i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 E ! E II' :I W FERREIRA, JOHN H !I i ( FERRELL, JEFFREY H & JANE FERRER, MARLENE BEATRIZ REYES I 40 COPPER VALLEY CT SANDRA LATA 14694 SW 46TH TER CHESHIRE, CT 06410 --- 0 10001 NW 135TH ST MIAMI, FL 33175--- 8910 HIALEAH, FL 33018--- 1.665 c I N FERRERA, HUMBERTO FESSER, IVAN j FESTA, NICHOLAS MICHAEL c 273131ST AVE NE ANN O FESSER 3282 29TH AVE NE o NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4477 450 SWAN AVE i NAPLES, FL 34120-- 0 J MIAMI SPRINGS, FL 33166--- 3931 ! a !! Ln �! o FIELD, SANDRAJANE t FIELD, TYLER VINCENT ; ( FIGUEROA, KARLA & ANGEL v KENNETH VINCENT FIELD i JOANNE MARIE FIELD I 2195 VERMONT LANE 2200 VERMONT LANE 2203 DANCY ST NAPLES, FL 84120 --- 0 N NAPLES, FL 34120---0 i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 O I N d FIRST, DANA T & CAROL A 1 ; " FL STAR CONSTRUCTION LLC FL STAR CONSTRUCTION LLC 2053 HAMLIN STREET 7742 ALICO RD i 7742 ALICO RD o NAPLES, FL 34120 - 0 i FORT MYERS, FL 33912---0 FORT MYERS, FL 33912---0 c I O ! i o • ! i o FL STAR CONSTRUCTION LLC i FLEMING, JENNIFER ( FLEMING, LANCE & TAMI N d 7742 ALICO RD i 2835 41ST AVE NE I ' 3040 OIL WELL RD y FORT MYERS, FL 33912-- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1581 i NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1459 ca L FLEMING, LANCE &TAMI i I FLEMING, LANCE J & TAMI S l FLEMING, LANCE 1 & TAMMI S V 3040 OIL WELL ROAD 3040 OIL WELL RD I i 3040 OIL WELL RD V I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ; NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1459 Im l k FLOOD, BENJAMIN P & MEGAN J FLORENCE, WILLIAM S & MARTHAJ FLORESJR, FELIX & DAISY W 3360 33RD AVE NE f % ANNE FLORENCE STURDIVANT I I 18123 SW 87TH PL NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I 131 BRINKLEY RD PALMETTO BAY, FL 33157--- 5984 POWDER SPRINGS, GA 30127 --- 0 label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/8160 -" _ Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 015160/8160 Packet Pg. 1015 0919/0915o AJaAV Dane alglledwoo wLu 19 x ww 9Z tewJol ap 91tanbl13 0918/0919©/JanV qp alglaedwoo „g/9 Z x,,[ azls label FLORES, FELIX & DAISY I i . FLORES, LUIS & RASA 18123 SW 87TH PL 2243 DANCY ST PALMETTO BAY, FL 33157--- 5984 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 FLORES, MARIO ENRIQUE 1EMIMA B HERNANDEZ SALAMANCA 2025 FAIRMONT LANE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 FONTAINE IV, P A & WILMA S JAMES W & MARTHA T CLARK 240 WAGON TRACE LN KERNERSVILLE, NC 27284--- 2189 FONTAINE IV, P A & WILMA 5 JAMES W & MARTHA T CLARK 240 WAGON TRACE LN KERNERSVILLE, NC 27284--- 2189 FORTE, JUANA M ANGELA FORTE 3285 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3204 FORTILUS, CHARLES & COLETTE 4898 SW 183RD AVE MIRAMAR, FL 33029--- 6321 FOWLER, DOUGLAS 2485 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7493 FRANCO, CESAR A 2420 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120--- 5539 FRANCOIS, HEROLD 2680 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7408 FRATERNALE, MATTHEW & LORI B 7 NEWTON CT CROTON ON HUDSON, NY 10520 --- 0 ram:. FLOTHE, JAMES MILO NICOLE LEE FLOTHE 1965 SAGEBRUSH CIRCLE i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 FONTAINE IV, P A & WILMA S JAMES W & MARTHA T CLARK 240 WAGON TRACE LN I, KERNERSVILLE, NC 27284--- 2189 i I li FONTE, JOSE ! IRIS ARBOLAEZ ' 3680 31ST AVE NE ! NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4491 I I ! I ! l i FORTES, HUGO LAZARD I i JESSIE FORTES i 14752 SW 169TH LN MIAMI, FL 33187--- 1744 i i i ! j FOULDS JR EST, JOHN L 751 VALLEY RD ! i ! P.HOENIXVILLE, PA 19460--3613 II ! ! f ! ! I , t FOWLER, RAYMOND LEE f 2460 41ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ! t �� II I� ! FRANCO, GABY S YASIEL DEPEW FERNANDEZ i 3335 31ST AVE NE ! I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 FRANZ, WILLIAM S CHRISTINE M GRANDJEAN ! •ff 2156 FAIRMONT LN I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4575 II FRAllANO, LEE WILLIAM i ! • LINDSAY RAE FRAllANO ! j 2361 37TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/8100 bigbette de format 25 min x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 05160/816 wgA.E] FLORES, MARIA MARCELA 3375 35TH AVE NE r NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1516 E FOIANINI, ANDRES 1345 CHARLESTON SQUARE DR #201 NAPLES, FL 34110 --- 0 FONTAINE IV, P A & WILMA S JAMES W & MARTHAT CLARK 240 WAGON TRACE LN KERNERSVILLE, NC 27284--- 2189 FORCINA, JOHN L & MARCELLA B 3370 W STREETSBORO RD RICHFIELD, OH 44286 --- 0 FORTIER-CRUZ, KERMIN ANTONIO DANIELLE LEE DALLA COSTA 2908 415T AVENUE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 FOUSEK, EDWARD S 2449 HEYDON CIR E NAPLES, FL 34120---0 FRANCIS, LEONE SERAPHIM 2208 DANCY ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 FRANCOIS, EDDIE K ANIA THAMAR BREVIL FRANCOIS 2732 27TH AVENUE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 FRASER, DONOVAN GAYAUTE COLLEEN SIMONE FRASER 244137TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 FREDEEN, ROBERT A & ROBYN L 2299 VERMONT LN NAPLES,'FL 34120 --- 0 N i C O y !. O N N I O O O O N` O N J rn <a 'D i w V a V V m r s x W d t a Packet Pg. 1016 FREGOSO,ROBERTO RAFAEL FREGOZO 749 GROVE DR NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1420 FUENTES, ROBERTO C 2570 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 GALICIA, MILTON MARISOL GALICIA 3340 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1777 GALLARDO,EUGENIO PO BOX 720625 MIAMI, FL 33172 --- 11 GALVAN, ALFREDO 2535 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7411 ! GAMARRA, WESLEY D GLORIA RINCON 3220 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 GARCIA RIVERA, JOSE A ELGA I RIVERA CINTRON ERIKA DEL VALLE 2562 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 j GARCIA, ALBERTO JOSEFINA Y MARTIN 2820 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL. 34120--- 3484 GARCIA, DIANA C 2480 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 GARCIA, HECTOR & LILIANA STEFFES INVESTMENTS INC 3030 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 • 34 0919/0%t O AJBAV 30Ae algltedwoo ww zg x wtu SZ tewJof ap aJJanblt3 0949/09L9© A13AV UtIM olgltedwoo „9/9 Z x „t azls lapel FUENTES, JULIA I 2621 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120---1527 ; f FUSCO, CHRISTOPHER & KRISTA 2008 PARSON ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 �i ! GALLAGHER, JOSEPH P & TERESA M 720 BEACON RD I PITTSBURGH, PA 15205--- 9662 GALLEGO,SANDRA 1i1 1202 NE 3RD TERR I i CAPE CORAL, FL 33909 --- 0 i i GALVIN, LINDA L i 2845 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4541 it l GAMBLE, ROBERT N & DOROTHY i 7664 S TRENTON DR 1 i CENTENNIAL, CO 80112--- 2613 I i i i GARCIA ROMERO, ALAN FRANCISCO l ! ( 3039 ELICE WAY NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 i i �I �I GARCIA, ALBERTO, A & NOEMI l ! i 2545 29TH AVE NE ( (i !il NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7406 I ; � GARCIA, EHOLIA KATIUSKA l 3320 RANDALL BLVD i I' NAPLES FL 34120--- 5548 i I� GARCIA, JOSE I' li I 0:1 W1_ .4.c FUENTES, JULIA 2621 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1527 FWY CORPORATION 1350 SW 175TH WAY PEMBROKE PINES, FL 33029--4824 I i ; 3765 56TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7487 it �il label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/8160 Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery °4160/8160 GALLAGHER, KEVIN & KRISTEN 11807 KENT GROVE DR SPRING HILL, FL 34610--- 8842 GALLEGOS, LLOLANDA & JOSE A 2985 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120---5503 GAMA, LAURA JASON MATTHEW HAMMOND 3045 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 GAMBOA, SUSET & YOELVY 2544 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 GARCIA, ALBERTO 3450 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120---0 GARCIA, ANIBAL & DOLORES E 9251 KENNETH AVE SKOKIE, IL 60076--- 1617 GARCIA, ESPERANZA CONTRERAS YOLANDA LLANAS 1530 23RD ST SW NAPLES, FL 34117--- 4322 GARCIA, JOSE DOLORES 2535 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1404 N C` 04 .y O N N 0 O O O N O N J i a V V I s x w Packet Pg. 1017 GARCIA, JOSE R VASQUEZ GLENDA C CASTRO GUZMAN 3690 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 GARCIA, LEONARDO RAFAEL 2382 HEYDON CIR E NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 GARCIA, RENE & ASTRID 3250 CYPRESS GLEN WAY APT 405 NAPLES, FL 34109--- 3878 GARCIA, Y EMILIO RODRIGUEZ 291135TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 GARZA,RENE LUZ CERVANTES . 2585 41ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 2837 GATTIE, RICHARD A 2420 41ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 2804 GAVI LANES, LUIS A CAROLINE SOTO 3725 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1879 GEDEUS, ADELINE & NATHAN 2336 51ST ST SW NAPLES, FL 34116 --- 0 GERCAK, JOHN P 713 OAKDALE AVE TOLEDO, OH 43605--- 3513 GIANFERRARA, JAMES CELENA THOMAS CARROLL 242037TH AVE NE NAPLESFL, FL 34120 --- 0 09t9/09t9 A�aAV Dane alcipedwoa ww Lg x ww 9Z tewjoj ap altanbll3 09t8/09t9g A]@AV gjlm @Igi1edwoo „8/9 Z x „t azls lagel GARCIA, JULIO L AURORA RIVERO 1875 NW 20TH AVE I MIAMI, FL 33125--- 1423 .i j GARCIA, MARIO j i 5730 W 14TH AVE ' HIALEAH, FL 33012---2217 ` II ', i I!I ( GARCIA, ROGELIO PO BOX 10673 NAPLES, FL 34101 --- 673 ! i i GARDINER, KEVIN 1 & LYNNE N 3225 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ! I GASPAR, ELIEZERJ i ALYSSA ROSE MUNOZ 3620 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I .J 'f G AUSE, ZENFORD 'I KAREN M WILLIAMS-GAUSE ! 2125 FAIRMONT LN � NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4576 i i i i } i GAVINA, JESUS CANO ! J RAQUEL CANO i 2830 31ST AVE NE i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i i GENERALE, JULIANO LIUDMYLAGENERALE 2520 41ST AVE N E NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ! i GG6 NAPLES LLC i r 3178 W PEMBROKE RD HALLANDALE BEACH, FL 33009--- 2017 i i I GARCIA, JUSTO N & ROSA M 2945 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120---5503 GARCIA, RAMON & MARGARITA 3640 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 GARCIA, ROGERIO J 235 W 16TH ST HIALEAH, FL 33010--- 3019 GARRETT, EMILY ROSE DORSEY HAROLD GARRETT 2278 VERMONT LANE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 GASTON, MICHAELT & LAURA L 204 DORSAY VALLEY DR CRANBERRY TWP, PA 16066--- 3762 GAUT, MARTIN EDWARD TINA RENEE WARREN 3710 33RD AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 GEARING, DAVID S MARLENE SAMONTANEZ GEARING 2255 DANCY ST NAPLES, FL 34120---0 GIBSON, KAMILAH i I 17420 SW 108 AVE j MIAMI, FL 33157 --- 0 label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/81.60 Eiiahette de format 25 mm x 67 mm comoatible avec Avery 95160/8160 GERALD A CORBETT REV TRUST 2502 11TH CIR NAPLES, FL 34603 --- 0 GHAFOURIPOUR, ABDOLKARIM 2740 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120---3574 GIL" FABIAN KARINNA SALAS BAILON 2044 HAMLIN ST NAPLES, FL 34120---0 c. O. .y o- N N o o' o 0 N O N J (L N L 4) w 2 V d V V s k w C d t v a Packet Pg. T0181 GILL, INDERBIR & NAVNEET KAOR 1126 HILLCREST AVE PASADENA, CA 91106 --- 0 GIROUD, MADELYN JORGE ALBERTO GIROUD 2091 VERMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 GODOY, ALAN CINDY N SANTOS 2540 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 GODOY, ALEXIS & TAYfvIE 2540 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1473 GOLDEN HOMES OF NAPLES LL 2600 COACH HOUSE LN NAPLES, FL 34105 --- 0 GOMEZ, MIGUEL A & MARrBEL 4430 KENTUCKY WAY AVE MARIA, FL 34142--- 5016 CONGORA, PEDRO F 12731 WOODBURY OAKS DR ORLANDO, FL 32828 --- 0 GONZALES, RENE MAY QUON 72014TH AVE APT B-2 BROOKLYN, NY 11209 --- 0 GO 7ALEZ, BLANCA E 2865 24TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 GONZALEZ, MARTA REINALDO MARTINEZ 2923 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120--- 2816 0918/0915� AJaAV Dane 91%edwoo WLIJ L9 X UJUI gZ 1PLUJot ap allaribl#3 C C 049/0%90 AJaAV yllM algltedwoo „8/9 Z x „t azls lagel GIMENEZ, ARMANDO J 8i CHERI L 1925 WELLINGTON ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i II i GLORIA ESTHER CRUZ TRUST l i 600 BILTMORE WAY APT 709 CORAL GABLES, FL 33134--- 7531 i ! i GODOY, ALAN I I (; CINDY SANTOS i 2540 35TH AVE NE i NAPLES, FL 34120---0 ! I 1 r GOEDEKE, MARGARITA MADERA i 2785 31ST AVE NE ! NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4477 i i ( GOMEZ-FAMILY TRUST Ij i % FANNY GOMEZ I 7950 NW 13TH ST i i li PEMBROKE PINES, FL 33024 --- 0 ! I GOMEZ,-PAUL ! 2227 VERMONT LN i ! NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I II II ! I Il G0NZALES, JUL10 CESAR ! / i ( 2199 DANCY ST i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i II I I I ! GONZALEZ, ANTONIO I / 3045 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1778 I ulw�.D GIRALDO, SANDRA 2098 SATSUMA LANE r NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 GLORICH HOLDINGS INC PO BOX 170332 HIALEAH, FL 33017 --- 332 GODOY, ALAN & CINDY 2540 35TH AVE N E NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 GOGAN; JACK ANTHONY 3280 37TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 GOMEZ; CARLOS RAFAEL AMANDA LUCIA GOMEZ 2212 DANCY ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 GOMEZ, SARA RANGEL MARCO A RAMIREZ FRANCISCA RODRIGUEZ GAMBOA 2430 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 GONZALES, LIULIM CHON 3965 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 GONZALEZ, BEATRIZ M HERNANDEZ HUGO HERNANDEZ VAZQUEZ 12120TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i GONZALEZ, GONZALOE i ERIC GONZALEZ I 299 E 39TH PL I i I ! HIALEAH, FL 33013---2264 i GONZALEZ, MICHEL L & EVELYN i 2863 EVERGLADES BLVD N i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/8160 Ftirinntto tin fnrmnt Sr, mm v V mm rmmnatihla nvar AvarvosiFn/Risn GONZALEZ, HENFE & RAFAEL 248122ND AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3569 GONZALEZ, OMAYDA DANIEL AYERBE 2830 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7414 3 E O U t 3 t U C i d t 7 J <a 7 C ea w Q a 0 N N O 0 0 0 N O N J a 0 L ao r- N N c O 2 0 N N 0 0 o: 0 N 0 N J a ea ' �1L (D ea Ui a U; U; m x w d E v a Packet Pg. 70,91 09 t8/09tgo R.IaAV cane algltedul0 WW Z9 x ruw 9Z tewjof op attarib!13 09t8/09t90 AJaAV ql!m alq!tedwoo „9/9 Z x „t azis label GONZALEZ, PORFIRIO I GONZALEZ, RAFAEL RICHARD GONZALEZ 2760 39TH AVE NE 2785 EVERGLADES BLVD N �. I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1439 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 GONZALEZ, ROY i i GONZALEZ, YERAL i 37155 E JONES RD COSSETTE CARIDAD CARRILLO l YODER, CO 80864 --- 0 ! 2166 CLEMENTINE ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 II ! I ' GONZALEZ-GONZALEZ, JESUS L 1: GOODY, ALAN GREIZY PEREZ i ( 2540 35TH AVE NE 2137 FAIRMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I I GORENCHAN, JEFFREY B i GORMAN JR, HERMAN F & ALICE M DENISE P GORENCHAN I 1 HAMBLIN HL 2633 27TH AVE NE i YARMOUTH PORT, MA 02675--- 2333 NAPLES, FL 34120---0 I GRANT, PAUL I� l I GRAN, STEPHEN P & AMY L it 2940 35TH AVE NE I I 2015 SAGEBRUSH CI NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4569 II 1 GRAY, THOMAS J & SANDRA - I GRAY, TYLER i 2540 29TH AVE NE i 2770 31ST ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7407 i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ! I GREEN, GIZELY i I I 1GREER, CLIFFORD L & KAMERAN R I i ! 3543 27TH AVE NE I 2065 FAIRMONT LN , NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1557 NAPLES, FL 34120---4574 I I i I i I I I II I GRMD INVESTMENTS LLC GROCE, MICHELLE & JEFFREY 11400 SW 43 TERR 2058 MINNEOLA ST MIAMI, FL 33165--- 3316 I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 �I I I II I GROVESATORANGE BLOSSOM <l i GROVES AT ORANGE BLOSSOM MASTER ASSOCIATION INC MASTER ASSOCIATION INC I % KEB MGMT % KEB MGMT i 6017 PINE RIDGE RD #262 i 6017 PINE RIDGE RD #262 NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 ! j GROVES AT ORANGE BLOSSOM MASTER ASSOCIATION INC % KEB MGMT 6017 PINE RIDGE RD #262 NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 0-1-29A.E' GONZALEZ, RICHARD P MILADYS GONZALEZ r 2775 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120---1568 E GONZALEZ, ZUZEL ANTONIA R GARCIA LOZANO 2440 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 GORDON SR, STEVEN J & ROBIN L 2365 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 443 GRACE, CAROL MARIE 2231 VERMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120---0 GRAY, GLENN N & CAROL H " 2113 PARSON ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 GREENIR, JEFFREY ALAN 2877 41ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 GREGORY SAGE -& ALEJANDRO MEDIA REVOCABLE TRUST 2069 HAMLIN ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 GROVES AT ORANGE BLOSSOM MASTER ASSOCIATION INC I ! %I<EB'MGMT 6017 PINE RIDGE RD #262 j ; I NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 I ;I) Ij i'I label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/8160 Etia'uette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 0�160/8160 GROVES AT ORANGE BLOSSOM MASTER ASSOCIATION INC % KEB MGMT 6017 PINE RDIGE RD #262 NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 GROVES AT ORANGE BLOSSOM MASTER ASSOCIATION INC % KEB MGMT 6017 PINE RIDGE RD #262 NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 GROVES AT ORANGE BLOSSOM. MASTER ASSOCIATION INC % KEB MGMT 6017 PINE RIDGE RD #262 NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 Packet Pg. 1020 GROVES AT ORANGE BLOSSOM MASTER ASSOCIATION INC % KEB MGMT 6017 PINE RIDGE RD #262 NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 GROVES AT ORANGE BLOSSOM MASTER ASSOCIATION INC % KEB MGMT 6017 PINE RIDGE RD #262 NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 GUCIK, SIGISMUND 5310 MCBRIDE'AVE CLEVELAND, OH 44127---1555 GUERRERO JR, DOUGLAS ADRIAN BRICEYDA NATHALY GUERRERO 2490 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 Gl11SA0-SENO,UIZ, CARMEN G EFREN AROCHO RIVERA 2471 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 GUTIERREZ, ANDREA ALEJANDRA GUTIERREZ 2925 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7460 GIJZMELI, BARBARA 2618 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL '34120--- 1405 HAMILTON' DEBORAH 2079 VERMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120---0 HAROLD EDWARD FREDERIGCS 2944 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 0918/0%1 @ AJMV pane algltedwoo ww LOX wui 9Z teuJJOI 9p 01190bl13 09,18/oMe /JaAV LIIIM alglfeduloo „8/9 Z x „j azls lagel i I GROVES AT ORANGE BLOSSOM MASTER ASSOCIATION INC i I % KEB MGMT I 6017 PINE RIDGE RD #262 i ! I NAPLES, FL 34119---0 HARRIS, KENNETH R 600 SANDTREE DR STE 203A PALM BEACH GARDE, FL 33403---1500 GROVES AT ORANGE BLOSSOM MASTER ASSOCIATION INC % KEB MGMT 6017 PINE RIDGE RD #262 NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 GUEDES, ERNESTO R CRISTINA A PASQUALI 241127TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 GUERRERO, ROLANDO HERRERA 3630 33RD AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1588 GURREA, STEVEN MICHAEL THUSSANNEE LAPSOPA 2770 37TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--0 6t17TENFELDER, GLENbAN L MONICA D GUTTENFELDER 2121 CLEMENTINE STREET NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 HAM FLORIDATRUST PO BOX 374 CTR OSSIPEE, NH 03814 --- 0 uza�4.D GROVES AT ORANGE BLOSSOM MASTER ASSOCIATION INC % KEB MGMT 6017 PINE RIDGE RD #262 NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 HAMPTON,JAYNE ! ' AMY ELIZABETH KOMNINOS 2050 MI N N EO LA ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 II , ,I i HARPER, ALFREDO C & FttANCES F i ( 288124TH AVE NE i ! I NAPLES, FL 34120---3524 I I. I I li HARRIS, STEVEN N ' 2840 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I I II II label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery/15160/8160 Etiduette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery @5160/8160 GROVES AT ORANGE BLOSSOM MASTER ASSOCIATION INC % KEB MGMT 6017 PINE RIDGE RD #262 NAPLES, FL 34119---0 GUERRA, NOEL & NORMIA 2895 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120--- 5590 GUILLAUME, WILFRIDO BRENDA MAHLALELA 2845 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 GUTIERREZ JR, JORGE H 2390 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---7453 GUZMAN, IRMA 3240 37TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1507 HAM, EMILIO A & EDA E 12221 SW 24TH TER MIAMI, FL 33175--- 7308 HANSEN, THOMAS DINE M LESLIE. 2988 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7459 HARRADEN, JONATHAN M 3295 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 449 HARRISON III, CHARLES WILLIAM CHRISTINE NICOLE HARRISON 2076 HAMLIN ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 Packet Pg. 1021 HART, ERIC PAUL CHIANTELLE BOUCHARD 2216 DANCY ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 HAVI LLC 408 NE 6TH ST UNIT 602 FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33304---0 HC & SONS LLC 25211 PINSON DR BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135---0 HC & SONS LLC 25211 PINSON DR BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135 --- 0 `HELMERTR, JAMES& MARTA A HELMER FAMILY TRUST UTD 11/19/04 1780 HILLCREST DR VENTURA, CA 93001--- 2332 HEREDIA, DANIEL DARIO 3622 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 HERNANDEZ, ELIECER OLANO 107 4TH ST SE NAPLES, FL 34117 --- 0 HERNANDEZ, KEILY 2536 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 HERNANDEZ,LAZARO BELKIS RIVES 3780 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3241 HERNANDEZ, RODOLFO BRITO SOKHAMALA SAY SUTHA SAY 2191 VERMONT LANE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 0919/09 G5o AJa&V sane alg1ledwoo Luul 19 x L ILU SZ JELUJOI ap attanbit3 09[9/091q@ AJa&V LIJIM algitedLU00 „g/S Z x „G aZls lagel HAUTAMAKI, JAY JOAN HAUTAMAKI PO BOX 534 YUCCA VALLEY, CA 92286---534 i) HAYES, JAMES DOUGLAS I SHELLI JO HAYES 2362 31ST AVE NE (' NAPLES, FL 34120- 0 i �Ili l ( HC & SONS LLC I i 25211 PINSON DR 4 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135---0 I' HE G LINARES TRUST I i I 32612ND AVE SE NAPLES, FL 34117--- 3764 i i l HENDERSON, GAR`(B 1' l 2318 HEYDON CIR W i I NAPLES, FL 34120---0 li HERNANDEZ, AMARILLIS NUNEZ 2026 FAI RMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120---0 9.A.4.c OEM- HAUVER,THOMAS 1771 MAJOR STONE CIR r PRAIRIE GROVE, AR 72753--- 8421 C HERNANDEZ, JUAN CARLOS i BLANCA E RESENDIZ PADRON i 4035 EVERGLADES BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i 1 � `) HERNANDEZ, KEILY 2536 39TH AVE NE i NAPLES, FL 34120---0 (' HERNANDEZ, LUCIAC I RAMON DIAZ i i 2765 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34108--- 2320 i HERNANDEZ, SEBASTIANA P0BOX 11346 NAPLES, FL 34101 --- 0 l i label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/8160 Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible aver Avery 0'5160/8160 HC & SONS LLC 25211 PINSON DR BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135 --- 0 HC & SONS LLC 2S211 PINSON DR BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135 --- 0 HEINTZ, RANDY LEE SHELBY LEE HEINTZ 2560 41ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 HENRY, GREG ANTHONIO 3466 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 HERNANDEZ, ELBIS 3575 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4486 HERNANDEZ, JULIA & GEORGE PO BOX 227584 12254 SW 1ST ST MIAMI, FL 33222 --- 0 HERNANDEZ, KYRA 3322 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 HERNANDEZ, LU18 3235 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 449 HERNANDEZ, WILLIAM M DARLENE V HERNANDEZ 2074 SATSUMA LANE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 N C O W d O N N o: o O O N O N J (L N L 4) W V IL V V m k W i C ' d E t V a Packet Pg. 1022 9.A.4.c haaAV cane algltedwoo wLu x wLLi 9Z teullo a attar] 09t8/09f�� L9 1 P 113 09L3/09I.90, AJaAV gjIm algltedwoo „9/9 Z x „G azis lags) - HERNANDO, GLORIA i HERRERA, JORGE ENRIQUE ZAMORA ' HERRERA, JUAN Y 2066 MANDARIN LN 1026 W WILSON ST 3540 EVERGLADES BLVD N >, NAPLES, FL 34120---4554 , COSTA MESA, CA 92627--- 3970 I i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 E o i � U HERRERA, MIGUEL F & NORMA C } I f HERRERA, NIURKA HERRERA, NIURKA t 3317 S TOWNER ST i I 2835 29TH AVE NE i ` JOSE R RODRIGUEZ L SANTA ANA, CA 92707---0 i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 2835 29TH AVE NE t V NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 HERRERA, 0 FERNANDA GASSO i HERRERA, OSIEL i ' HERRERA, TAMARA J 3986 31ST AVE NE 2586 39TH AVE NE 2791 GOLDEN GATE BLVD E ea NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7404 i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 7 C ev I E I I E II W HERRERA-BARRIOS, MABEL RENEE i ( HIDALGO, FRANCISCO 1 i f HIGDON TR, GAREY D Q MARIO HERRERA i FIORELLA S CIEZA DE LEON I TR DTD 8-5-88 d 2378 ORCHARD ST PO BOX 960461 i PO BOX 221769 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i MIAMI, FL 33296 --- 461 LOUISVILLE, KY 40252--- 1769 N N i ' p VI HIGGINS, DAD MICHAEL _ I ( HIJAZI, BETTY M l/ HINCHLIFFE, GREGORY IVl o VALERY ANNE HIGGINS I I DAVID LOPEZ I RACHEL A HINCHLIFFE N 2110 SATSUMA LANE i 1013 CAPRI ST i 2275 HEYDON CIR W N NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 CORAL GABLES, FL 33134---2577 I i NAPLES, FL 34120---4585 J (L ILn p HINES, GARFIELD HINES, MICHAEL1,TAMARA l i i' HINLEY, PATRICIA LEE 00 N EDELL HINES I 2525 31ST AVE NE 2585 27TH AVE NE 4665 8TH ST NE i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 456 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 N NAPLES, FL 34120---2904 i O I f i N I I �I > 4) HIPWELL, BRANDON H 1 ! / HITE, TRAVIS I HITTINGERTR, HELmUT&LYNDA NATASHA CHELSEY HIPWELL i i JULIANA GARCIA i HELMUT HITTINGER R/T 4-29-91 p 1994 PARSON ST I i 2935 39TH AVE NE i 2175 WILSON BLVD N N NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120---2576 a ' I I p C' HITTINGERTR, HELMUT & LYNDA I I '" HITTINGERTR, HELMUT & LYNDA 1 ' HITTINGERTR, HELMLIT & LYNDA J L HELMUT HITTINGER R/T 4-29-91 i HELMUT HITTINGER R/T 4-29-91 i HELMUT HITTINGER R/T 4-29-91 2175 WILSON BLVD N i 2175 WILSON BLVD N 2175 WILSON BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120--- 2576 I i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 2576 I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 2576 V HOELAND, CHRISTOPHER I (" HOFFMAN, DEREK & KRISTA ' ! i HOLBERT, VVILLIANI E IL ARACELI TERRONES i I 2056 HAMLIN ST f i WANDA EWING HOLBERT V 2246 HEYDON CIR W NAPLES, FL 34120,--0 I 1972 PARSON ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 m i li. I k HOLCOMB, JASON C & JOAN i l HOLMACHEA, YANET CABRERA HOLMER iV,-GEORGE E & CASSIE A LLI 2770 27 T H AVE NE i 2910 37TH AVE NE I 2470 37TH AVE NE _ NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 433 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I i NAPLES, FL 34120- 7451 d I a. :.- label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/8160 Etlquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 06160/8160 Packet Pg. 1 3 HOLMES, EIRADLEYTHOMAS KRISTINE NICOLE H RODRIGUEZ 1859 ALAMEDA DR NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 HORTA, ANDRES EDUARDINA HORTA MILAGROS AMARILIS IGLESIAS 445 NW 20TH AVE MIAMI, FL 33125--- 3464 HUFFMAN, WALTER T & MARIA 2460 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120---3572 HUSSMANN, BETZABE STEFANIE ANDRE 4500 22ND STREET NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 IAROSSI'JR, JOSEPH COLLEEN CARROLL IAROSSI 2042 MINNEOLA ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 IGLESIAS, MAIGftETH 32416TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ILAGAN, EMILIANO & LOLITA 6906 LA MIRADA DR HOUSTON, TX 77083--- 2439 INFANTE, ROLANDO DASHIELL 000 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 IZQUIERDO, DANAYS EDGAR M FLORES 3675 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 0919/091�@) AjonV cane alglteduJo3 WLLI L9 x uiul 9Z Ienol ap alIanblu C 09,t8/09 t90 AjanV uilM appedwoo „9/9 Z X „ l azls lagel i i HOLT EST, BARBARA F DENISE DAVENE LAPE 6611 SHINING SUN CT II TAMPA, FL 33634--- 1251 i :: i HOULE, THOMAS H 1 i 2070 MANDARIN LN I I1 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4554 i II HUGHES, LISSA 282124TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3524 i 1 HUSSMANN, HARALD & BETZABE ; 4500 22ND ST SE lNAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i I IBALMEA, YOSEM LAUZARDO 1 i ZULEYMIS RIESGO CARDOZO i 2615 35TH AVE NE i NAPLES, FL 341.20 --- 0 ►;fir i �� 1 __ _ __ IGNATENKO, MIGUEL D _ ` 2975 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7400 ILOTZ LLC \ 2148 GROVE DR NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i INNOCENT, DAVIDSON l I 3174 EVERGLADES BLVD N I NAPLES, FL 34120.---0 J S ILLES & J T ILLES TRUST 39656 SOUTHWIND LN NORTHVILLE, MI 48168--- 3494 =-"A.4.D HORSFORD, JACQUELINE L 872 E 59TH ST r BROOKLYN, NY 11234--- 1804 E HTH GROUP INC 5455 SW 8TH STREET STE 210 MIAMI, FL 33134--- 2718 HURLEY, THOMAS E & KAY F 2286 VERMONT LANE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 HUTSON, AUSTIN R 2481 SOUTH URBANA LISBON RD SOUTH CHARLESTON, OH 45368--- 9750 IZZO, (MARK & DARLENE 1936 WELLINGTON ST i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i� lip JACKO 1R ET UX, ANDREW i 1306 FRANKLIN LN i ! ROCKAWAY, N1 07866--- 5814 i it ''I I label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/8160 Etiquette de format 25 him x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 05160/8160 IGLESIAS, IVAN 2695 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1484 ]LAGAN, EMILIANO & LOLITA 6906 LA MIRADA DR HOUSTON, TX 77083--- 2439 IMONDI, PAIGE & CHAftLES A 2345 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 443 IRIZARRY TR, TRIANA L TRIANA L IRIZARRY LIVING TRUST 200 SW 136TH PL MIAMI, FL 33184--- 1051 J & D INVEST LLC 3840 28TH AVE SE NAPLES, FL 34117 --- 0 JACKSON, JONATHAN LEON JENNA LYNN JACKSON 3485 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 Packet Pg. 1024 09t9/09i- c@ AJaAV oane aigiteduloo ww Lg x wu.I 93tewjoJ ap a}ta0bi13 09,18/091.go AJaAV gllm aigltedwoo ,.8/9 Z x „t azis iagei JACKSON, TERENCE COLE JAGUAR & COLUMBUS BLVD LLC EVA JACKSON ': 8000 NW 7TH ST STE 201 2720 27TH AVE NE ; MIAMI, FL 33126- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 433 III I! JAMES, JERRY L & PEGGY L JANE A GRETHEL REV LIV TRUST 1627 PRIMROSE LN 1 ; 28044 CAVENDISH CT APT 5803 FAIRBORN, OH 45324--- 8741 I BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135--- 2465 i it I JANUARIS LLC l �!I JARVIS, ROBERT C 2053 FAIRMONT LN l i JENNIFER J URNESS i t NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4574 9351 SUMMER PL l i l NAPLES, FL 34109--- 7316 i JEAN LOUIS, MIRLENE BERNADIN i JENKINS, DEBORAH G JORDANIS JEAN LOUIS 1939 WELLINGTON ST 321131ST AVE NE I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ! JENNETTE, SARAJANE JENSEN,JODIE KAY l ! 7023 BELLARD CT ! 1904 WELLINGTON ST I! RALEIGH, NC 27617 --- 0 i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i JIMENEZ, JOSS L IVIARICELA 1 ! JIMENEZ, LOSE LUIS MARICELA RAMIREZ ORNELAS { ! LUISA MARIA MATUTE MOREIRA 2113 FAIRMONT LN 2860 415T AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---4576 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 JOHANNSEN, NICHOLAS JOHN F LEWISTRUST 1 ! 2002 FAIRMONT LN I i 2760 MARSH POINT LN SE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I ; SOUTHPORT, NC 28461--- 8504 JOHNSON, AUSTIN S & LESLIE K i JOHNSON, GARY E I" 2004 PARSON ST 2640 31ST AVE NE i NAPLES, FL 34120---0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I i ! JOLLY, CANDICE M ` " ( JONES, ALBERTE FRANCOIS l NEIL P ELLIOTT i !' 2077 FAIRMONT LN i 2560 OIL WELL RD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 JONES, BRETT B JORAWAR-BHIMSEN, URMILLA 2023 PARSON 5T 226 BURNS ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ; : SOMERSET, NJ 08873 --- 0 I!I i label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/8160 Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery °5160/816[ JAIN, SHAILENDRA KUMAR 6145 GALLOWAY CT GALLOWAY, OH 43119 --- 0 JANETE MESSINEO LIVTRUST 16430 STUART AVE ORLAND PARK, IL 60467--- 5378 JC EQUIPMENT INC, 724 NW 208TH DRIVE PEMBROKE PINES, FL 33029 --- 0 JENKINS, KOBY G LOURDES LOPEZ JENKINS 3595 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1557 JFD NAPLES LLC 11693 BALD EAGLE WAY NAPLES, FL 34120--4320 JIMENEZ-PEREZ, JENNIFER DELBY PEREZ 2465 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120---0 JOHN, VINCENT K & ANNAMMA K 2037 FAIRMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 JOHNSON, WALFI M & ELMA I ELEANOR BOYD 1033 VILLA PL GIRARD, OH 44420--- 2084 10NES, BEN "F & APRIL 430SANJUAN NAPLES, FL 34113 --- 0 JORGE, AMAURY FERNANDEZ 2007 SAGEBRUSH CIR NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4569 Packet Pg. 1 571 JOSE & JUANITA PINEDA R/TRUST 1871 16TH ST NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 5447 JOSEPH, BOBBY 2595 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 456 JOSEPH, HERCULE CELANNE DORISCAR JOSEPH 2920 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 09 GS/09I.50 AJaAV pane olgltedwoo ulw L9 x wLU 9Z tewaof ap 91191bI13 091-8/09Lyo AJaAV ytlrm algltedwoo „9/9 Z x j azis lapel i JOSE, PONCIANO VENTURA 2331 DELLA DR NAPLES, FL 34120---0 i I I I� it i JOSEPH, CYRIAC & SANY l i i 5209 HARVEST HILL DR j JAMESVILLE, NY 13078 --- 0 JOYCE A CULVER REVOCABLE TRUST Z837 LAKE BALDWIN LN #A402 ORLANDO, FL 32814 --- 0 JUNE D LONG FAMILY TRUST PO BOX 3216 JACKSON, WY 83001 --- 0 KAJY, KENT 8495 LAUREL LAKES COVE NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 KANTAINIS, CHRISTIAN JENNIFER L GUSTAFSON 2915 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---1490 KAUSLAND, SNORRE &JULIE 2117 SATSUMA LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 KEELING, JOANNE 1940 WELLINGTON ST NAPLES, FL 34120--- 5330 KELLY, PANSY ANN WINSTON HALSTEAD 2260 DANCY ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 JOSEPH, OLANDIEU & LUMANE 2082 SAGEBRUSH CIR NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4568 JUERGEN FRANZ TRUST 2112 PARSON ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 JUREK, NATALIE BLANCO STEPHEN RJUREK 2890 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 KALATHAKIS, IOANNIS & ROSICLER 1975 FAIRMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 KAPLAN, SCOTT & LINDSAY 2366 HEYDON CIR E NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 KAZIMIROFF, THEODORE ALANA DELUCA 2133 CLEMENTINE ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 KEIDEL, WAYNE A . 1509 GUNDERSON AVE i BERWYN, IL 60402--- 1316 l i KEMM, CHRISTOPHER E 2685 29TH AVE NE I i NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7409 i label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/81�60 Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 05160/8160 wsuA.El JOSEPH & MARY PRUSH TRUST 665 VINTAGE RESERVE CIR #9C NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 JOSEPH, CYRIAC & SANY 5209 HARVEST HILL DR JAMESVILLE, NY 13078 --- 0 JOSEPH, PAULEUS & ROSEMANE 3665 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 JULIAN, CLIFFORD A . 2930 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120--- 2819 JUSTE, BERNADE B 3530 33RD AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 2815 KANDATHIL, BIJU A & DOLLY B 573 COMSTOCK AVE ELMHURST, IL 60126 --- 0 KATOUCHIS, JOHN 5372 FERRARI AVE AVE MARIA, FL 34142 --- 0 KEARNEY, SHANE & AMBER 2163 VERMONT LANE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 KELLMAN, ELISE 0 WILCY 0 BRATHWAITE 2975 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 KEMPER, DANIELJ 2214 VERMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 Packet Pg. 1026 KEN AND LIA FRY LIVING TRUST 5247 FERRARI AVE AVE MARIA, FL 34142--- 9541 KEPPLE, CHRIStOPHER TERRANCE JESSICA FIGUEROA KEPPLE 3697 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 KEYSER, DAVID 255 CAYS DR APT 2005 NAPLES, FL 34114--- 9671 KIDD, LINDA M 36 LOWER LANE BERLIN, CT 06037 --- 0 KIRK, WESLEY A & SHEILEY W 2057 MANDARIN LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 KIRNON, ANNA LOUISE ANTOINE ALDRIC KIRNON 2685 31STAVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 09I8/09[9@ A1aAV OW alglt2dwoo WW L9 x WW 9Z teuuot al) 0110�bIJ3 ogg/09 t90 (JaAV mum algltedwoo „g/g Z x „ j azls logel ! KENNEDY, JOSEPH E ` ! 85PARK AVE ROCHESTER, NY 14607 --- 0 I KLASS, RICHARD 8 STONEHENGE LN EAST NORTHPORT, NY 11731--- 4520 KNUTSON, PETER R & BROOKE M 1996 PARSON ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 KONCZ, At ERT A & BABETT KISS 1990 FAIRMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4571 05CICA, MILOS 3568 FINCH COURT LAKE ORION, MI 48360 --- 0 ''I l ! KERINS, WILLIAM L ! KATHLEEN ANNE KERINS 1964 PARSON ST I NAPLES, FL 34120---0 II j' KHAN, KHAIRULLA & FREEZA' 6525 UTOPIA PKWY FRESH MEADOWS, NY 11365 --- 0 i i KIEFERJR, ALLAN E & LISA K i ' 2510 41ST AVE NE i NAPLES, FL 34120--- 2836 ! li ! I! i I ! 9.A.4.c A KENNEDY, MICHELLE AILEEN 2535 41ST AVE NE r NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 E KERLUS, PRUDISE 3323 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 KIBRIA FAMILY TRUST 5741 GOLDEN OAKS LN NAPLES, FL 34119--- 1219 KIM, FRANCIS & MINHWA 203 PRINCETON LANE GLENVIEW, IL 60026 --- 0 KIRKLEY, MINDY ' ( KIRKPATRICK, NELDA & JAMES 2129 FAIRMONT LN ( KELLY SUE & GEORGE RAY MARTIN i NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4576 i 2196 DANCY ST NAPLES, FL 34120--- 5618 1i .I it !� KISS•1R, S FRANK 13808 VIA. ALTO CT i I i SARATOGA, CA 95070--- 5259 ! ! I i ! ! KLOMAN, MARGARETVIRGINIA ! ' FRANK TROPFENBAUM i i 2106 CLEMENTINE STREET i NAPLES,,FL 341.20 --- 0 i i I KOBLEUR*JR, RICHARD & MARIA I I 3545 29TH AVE NE ' NAPLES, FL 34120---2822 i i ! I KONG, GENE CHIN JAUW 2390 39TH AVE NE i ! ! NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7557 i I ! i ICOSZEWNIK,MICHAELJ & LINDAJ i� i 2023 SAGEBRUSH CIR i i NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4569 ! !i it label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery (�"5160/81,60 tigLlette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery °5160/8160 KISSEL, IAN MITCHELL NATALIEJANE RHOADS 2102 SATSUMA LANE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 KLYCZEK, WALTER & NANCY . 12425 BARONE DR SILVER CREEK, NY 14136--- 1203 KOELSCH, LINDA 7506 W 5 MILE RD # A FRANKSVILLE, WI 53126---9655 KOOPMAN, GEORGE MICHAEL VICKI LYNN KOOPMAN 2880 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 KOVY, JOZSEF 2250 HEYDON CI W NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4584 3 E 0 U t v t V C i J 7 C ev >r W Q a O N N O O O 0 N O N J a O Ln 00 N Packet Pg. 1027 KOWALSKI EST, MILDRED A PATRICIA E JAHASKE 1611 CAMBER LEY CT UNIT 4 BARTLETT, IL 60103 --- 747 KRAUSS, MATTHEW W'& KRISTIN J 2095 SAGEBRUSH CIR NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 KROL, SAMANTHA CIUINN 2305 TANGERINE LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 KRUEGER, JAM ESA 120 N HOWARD RD CURTICE, OH 43412 --- 0 KYAN; CHWAN P DARLENE E CARPENTER 2105 SATSUMA LANE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 LABRA, CIRTNA NAVA 3170 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---446 LAKHANC MEHBOOB 14760 ASHLAND PL DAVIE, FL '33325--- 6325 LAIVIORTE, FRANCIS & CAMILA 2079 SAGEBRUSH CIR NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 091.9/09 G5o AJaAV 09Ae agledwoo Luw L9 x LLIw qZ 1ew101 op 9119rib113 09;18/09G90 hJaAV ullm olglleduloo „g/g Z x „f ozls lapel KOZAWICK, DANIELJOSEPH l I l SHIRLEY ALENNIE KOZAWICK I ; 2234 VERMONT LN Ijl NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 li KRAUSS, ROBERT & ROSEMARY 2462 HEYDON CIR E NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i �i KRONK, ADDIE KATHLEEN 4845 COUNTY RD #202 l FULTON, MO 65251---0 i KSWFL HOMESITES LLC i - i I 910 39TH ST SW i i NAPLES, FL 34117 --- 0 \ L CONSTRUCTION LLC ` i 3594 29TH AVE NE i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i _ LAn,'SUSAN- i 2251 VERMONT LANE I i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ' j i LAM TR,-IVONNE A MERCEDES M LAM 5406 PL J33175 H-6241 MIAMI, FL - LAPORTE, SARA EMILY & KEVIN J " 3165 37TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1775 LARUSSO, GIOVANNI MAY -LING ENEDINA AGUILERA 3560 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 LANAHANN-REVOCABLE TRUST 2238 HEYDON CIR W NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4584 LARIOS, EDUARDO A GALINA YUDINOVA 6012 CROWNPOINT DR NE RIO RANCHO, NM 87144---8715 LAURORE, KENOL & SANDY 2680 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 2921 omgHD KRAMER, ELWANDA H 93 KUNZE DR r SAINT CHARLES, MO 63303--- 5927 c KRINCE LIVING TRUST LINDA M KRINCE TR 7137 ERIE DR MENTOR, OH 44060--- 5147 KRONZ, JONATHAN CHRISTOPHER 3224 33RD AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 KUNTZ, JOHN E & MARY A 260 WESTBROOK DR TOMS RIVER, NJ 08757--- 5640 LA1SPERIA DAVEY-LL.C, 4971 BONITA BAY BLVD UNIT 401 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 --- D -LAKE, TAMES E 8i GAIL G 2038 MINNEOLA STREET NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 LAMAY, FELIPETRISTAO STEPHANIE LAMAY 2735 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 LANIOUS, KATHERINE TODD P SHELBAUGH 2105 FAIRMONT LN NAPLES, FL. 34120---4576 LARSON, MORGAN MICHELE BRANDON JEFFRIES 1882 ALAMEDA DR NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 LAWRENCE TR, L C 3870 25TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34117--- 7130 label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery'"5160/81;60 '�' Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm comnatible avec Avery © 160/8160 Packet Pg. 1 871 LEAL, JUSTIN JAVIER CHELSEA BEASLEY 2885 37TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 LEDESMA, BEATRIZ HERNANDEZ ORLANDO CAMEJO CARMONA 2912 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 LEINWEBER, ARNAUD W .3496 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 LENERTZ,' JEFFREY &.BRITTANY 2063 SAGEBRUSH CIR NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 BEN C PRATT/SIX, MILE CYPRESS PKWY FORT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 BEN C PRATT/SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY FORT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 LENNAR HOMESLLC 10481 BEN C PRATT/SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY FT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 BEN C PRATT/SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY FT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 BEN C PRATT/SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY FT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 BEN C PRATT/SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY FT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 09t8/0916, AJaAV Dane algltedLLloo LULU L9 x Luw SZ Ieuuol ap 9119 13 09,1g/0919© hJaAV LItIM alq!ledwoo „g/9 Z x „t azls lag8l i LEBON, FRITZ P i BEATRIZ E VILLA CASTRILLON 3345 35TH AVE NE � NAPLES, FL 34120---0 i j: i LEE, GARY W i 20082 US HIGHWAY 81 I i ARLINGTON, SD 57212--- 5015 i i i i 1 + ' LEITH, ROGER D & SUE E 3720 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 417 i LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 BEN C PRATT/SIX MILE CYPRESS FT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 BEN C PRATT/SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY FORT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 BEN C PRATT/SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY FT MYERS, FL 33966--0 LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 BEN C PRATT/SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY FT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 BEN C PRATT/SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY FT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 9.A.4.c LEBRON, JOSE E 2200 DANCY ST r NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 LEH.MAN, DAVID JOHN & MARY ANN 2358 HEYDON CIR E NAPLES, FL 34120--0 LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 BEN C PRATT/SIX MILE i CYPRESS PKWY FT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 ' LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 BEN C PRATT/SIX MILE ; CYPRESS PKWY ! FT MYERS, FL 33966 -0 li label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 65160/8160 Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery ®5160/8160 LEJA, ADAM 3340 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 BEN C PRATT/SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY FORT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 BEN C PRATT/SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY FORT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 LENNWH0MES LlC 10481 BEN C PRATT/SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY FT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 BEN C PRATT/SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY FT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 BEN C PRATT/SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY FT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 BEN C PRATT/SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY FT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 BEN C PRATT/SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY FT MYERS, FL 33966---0 Packet Pg. 1029 LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 BEN C PRATT/SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY FT MYERS, FL 33966---0 LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 BEN C PRATT/SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY FT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 BEN C PRATT/SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY FT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 BEN •C PRAT('/SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY FT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 BEN C PRATT/SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY FT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 BEN C PRATT/SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY FT MYERS, FL * 33966---0 09L8/0915© A)@AV Dane alglteduloo uIW L9 x ull0 gZ tewjol ap attariblt3 09;i,8/09G99 AJaAV ytly` alglteduloo ,<9/9 Z X „G azls 10gel ! i LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 BEN C PRATT/SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY ' FT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 LESLIE R 4LAWITZTRUST 125 ASPENWOOD DR MORELAND HILLS, OH 44022---2301 LEZCANO, TERESA ANA MARIA LEZCANO MADELIN LEZCANO 3140 S OCEAN DR APT 1108 HALLANDALE BEACH, FL 33009--- 7238 LIEGL, JOHN B & BRENDA L 5476 AUBURN DR NORMAN, OK 73521---0 LINDLEY II,'STUART DEAN 2990 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 i LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 BEN C PRATT/SIX MILE I CYPRESS PKWY FT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 i I� i LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 BEN C PRATT/SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY i FT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 i li ' LENNAR HOMES LLC i 10481 BEN C PRATT/SIX MILE f CYPRESS PKWY FT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 :I LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 BEN C PRATT/SIX MILE 1 i f CYPRESS PKWY jI FT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 i LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 BEN C PRATT/SIX MILE `! CYPRESS PKWY i ! FT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 i i LESLIE, BRIAN & NATALIA 1033 DESCHUTES DR COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80921---5707 i i i i i LIANES, LISET ALFONSO 2440 27TH AVE NE i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 LIGONDE, MARIE L 2824 29TH AVE NE i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i �II i LINDSEY, MIRACLE ANTHONY CADET i 2930 35TH AVE NE l NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I; label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/8160 Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 0�160/8160 WaEl LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 BEN C PRATT/SIX MILE r CYPRESS PKWY FT MYERS, FL. 33966 --- 0 LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 BEN C PRATT/SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY FT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 BEN C PRATT/SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY FT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 BEN C PRATT/SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY FT MYERS, FL 33966---0 LENNAR HOMES LLC 10481 BEN C PRATT/SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY FT MYERS, FL 33966 --- 0 LEON, ADIENE 'FACENDA 2854 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 LEWIS & CLARK EXPEDITION LLC 8473 BAY COLONY DR APT 502 NAPLES, FL 34108 --- 710 LIANI M REYNATRUST 2282 VERMONT LANE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 LINARES, CRISALIDA JOHAN RAFAELGARTEROI PARRA 2756 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 LINK, CHRISTOPHER & KATHERINE 10209 SOUTH GOLDEN ELM DR ESTERO, FL 33928 --- 0 Packet Pg. 1030 LIPOVSKY,THOMAS WAYNE JUDITH ANN LIPOVSKY 2135 VERMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4562 LISA JAYNE BREEHL REVTRUST 2505 41ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 LLOYD, RANDALL S 3420 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1586 LOGUE,PATR1CKJOSEPH ERIN•EILEEN LOGUE 2394 ORCHARD ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 09t8/09160 i i II� i i i i i i• ,i i .i i i i iI �Il LONG, STEPHEN H & PATRICIA E 20801 WATERBEACH PL i POTOMAC FALLS, VA 20165 --- 0 LOPEZ, GILBERTO & MARIA 11049 SW 3RD ST MIAMI, FL 33174--- 1219 LOPEZ, LAZARO JULIO IDARMIS GARCIA 3310 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 LORZ, MARLON CASTRO KAILIN AYALA ARMERO 3025 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120---0 LOPE-4 WILFREDO MARLEN CARTAYA 2131 VERMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 LORIGA, NELVYS DUQUE 6484 SEAWOLF CT APT 84 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 GaAV pane alglledwoo ww L9 x wui aZ lewaol ap a11adbp3 09G90 laanV ql!m olgpedwoo „8/9 Z x „t azls lagel i LIPPE II, STEPHEN B MELANIE LYNN LIPPE 2398 HEYDON CIRCLE E NAPLES, FL 34120---0 i LITTAU ET UX, WM 1205 W 26TH ST S i INDEPENDENCE, MO 64052--- 3215 i ; LOCHEN, JEREMY D 2495 39TH AVE NE I i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I j i I LOMANDO, DENNIS A 8i MARGARET 1. 34617 HEAVENLY LN DADE CITY, FL 33525 --- 0 i i LOPEZ, ALFREDO VALDES 3695 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120----418 LOPEZ,JUAN MANCISCO l ISRAELPACHECO 570 NW 123 AVE MIAMI, FL 33182 --- 0 i ; LOPEZ, LEOPOLDO 2097 SATSUMA LANE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 ; LOPEZ, MIRIAM i 2870 EVERGLADES BLVD N i NAPLES, FL 34120---2806 `I) i LORENZ,JONATHAN i LORENZ, MONICA A C MELENDEZ i 2116 PARSON STREET NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i it LORRAINE V MCKAY REV TRUST GEORGE W MCKAY REV TRUST 3730 14TH ST N ' NAPLES, FL 34103 --- 0 i i label size 1 " x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/81,60 Ffirnunffo tin fnrmnt 9F mm v R7 mm emmnnfihle avar. Avery 0M Rn/Ri Rn LIRA ET UX, ANTONIO U 1952 PROVINCIAL LN r FT MITCHELL, ICY 41011--- 1816 LIU, YUN LIKUN YU 2134 CLEMENTINE ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 LOCKE, MICHAEL P 3685 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---1533 LONG, ANTONIO NADIAH YUSUF 2195 DANCY ST NAPLES, FL 34120---0 LOPEZ, FRANCISCO R OSARYSSANTOS 3270 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120--- 2823 LOPEZ, JUAN M & NYDIA' 2715 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120--- 5593 LOPEZ; LUIS-FRANCISCO BARRERA 1912 WELLINGTON ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 LOPEZ, PEDRO A & CONSUELO A 3160 41ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3273 LORI JEAN DIMMICK LIV TRUST 3360 CAYMAN LANE NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 LOUIS, KERRY 2456 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 Packet Pg. TO171 LOVELOCK, CRAIG R TEMIKA N LOVELOCK 4341 SW 18TH ST WEST PARK, FL 33023---3407 LOZANO, JAIME ANDRES 1165EVERGLADES BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 LUCID, GABRIEL SANTOS LUCIO PO BOX 653033 MIAMI, FL 33265--- 3033 LUNA, TOMAS 1924 TIMBERLINE LN SHERMAN, TX 75092 --- 0 LYDIA MISCHENKO TRUST 1848 STONEHOUSE RD ARCADIA, CA 91006 --- 0 LYNCH, TIMOTHY R & DIANE S 2795 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1881 0912/09150 AJaAV oaAE op edwoo Luca L9 x wtti gZ lemol ap allanbp], 091.8/09L5o AJand uIIM algpedwoo „g/g Z x „G azls label LOVOS, WALTER M & P TORO REV JOINTTRUST 18581 SW 7TH ST PEMBROKE PINES, FL 33029--- 6002 M&M LAND TRUST 8260 SW 182ND ST PALMETTO BAY, FL 33157--- 6134 MACIAS, JOSE M & MYRA 2435 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MADRIGAL, HECTOR MANUEL JANNIS MADRIGAL 2825 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 SAMANTHA TAYLOR LOVOS 2019 PARSON STREET NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 LUBARS, MICHELLE M 291124TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 LUCIO, JUAN MORENO KATERINE MORENO 1862 ALAMEDA DR NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 LUSK III, HAL H. & CRYSTAL G 2810 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1880 LYLES, DEBORAH J MICHAELA LYLES 3660 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 LYNCH, TIMOTHY R & DIANE S 2795 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1881 M W & P LSTAHL REVOCTRUST 752 GRAND RAPIDS BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MAB &J INVESTMENTS LLC 11439 SW 133RD TERR MIAMI, FL 33176 --- 0 M4CIER, JERRYD & MARIE H 2495 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 2929 MADUENO, JOSE NORBERTO 12761 NW 99TH PLACE HIALEAH GONS, FL 33018---0 9.A.4.c LOYNES, MATTHEW JOHN LAUREN SUZANNE CROWDER r 2019 SAGEBRUSH CIR E NAPLES, FL 84120 --- 0 E LUBIN, RICOT SUZE BIEN-AIME 2920 41ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 LUGO, THOMAS LOUIS & AMIANDA 2263 VERMONT LANE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 LUTHER, GEORGE E & SUSAN JOY 2820 37TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7431 LYNCH JR,. EDWIN M 3210 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3229 LYNCH, TIMIOTHY'12 &DIANE S 2795 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1881 MI W & P L STAH L REVOC TRUST 752 GRAND RAPIDS BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MACARTHUR, JAMES ERIC LAURIE ANGELA MACARTHUR 2336 ORCHARD ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0. MADERA, IRAN MUNOZ MAYULI OTERO MEDINA 2880 29TH AVE N E NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MAESTRI, KIMBERLY E & MA91ANO 2189 FAIRMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 E O U t t V C i d t J 7 C ev W Q a 0 N N O O O 0 N O N J (L o' L co N N C T 0 N ` N 0 0 o• 0 N O N J aI N d m V a V V m k W d t V a I. label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 0'5160/8160 FMnp.atp. rip. fnrmat 95 mm x R7 mm rmmnatihle aver. Avery 65160/8160 Packet Pg. 1032 0918/09tS® Jan Dane a I 9Z p V Iq.ledwoo uIw Lg x u!u! teulJoi a aatariblt� 0918/09190 AJanV ql!m alcipedwoo „9/9 Z x „j azis lagel a . MAGDALENO, ADRIAN & MARIBEL MAGDALENO, ADRIAN & MARIBEL ` i MAGEE, JAMES & YAHAIRA 2631 EVERGLADES BLVD N I ; 2631 EVERGLADES BLVD N ! i 2830 RANDALL BLVD r NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1527 ( NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1527 i I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3576 C E O MAGLOIRE, MCP'HERSON V i MAGUR, GEORGE P ! ; I MAJESTIC RESIDENTIAL CONT INC v 1900 WELLINGTON ST I i MARILYN A MAGUR ', 3830 64TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 EDWARD G MAGUR I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 V ANN MARIE MAGUR 833 ODELL AVE ( i ENDICOTT, NY 13760--- 1733 MAKRAM, CHERIF & MERVAT i MALAGA, LOSE L & PATRICIA L i ' MAMMADOV, PASHA J PO BOX 757 2930 27TH AVE NE I 1301 JONAS AVE ROCK HILL, NY 12775 --- 757 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i SACRAMENTO, CA 95864 --- 0 II' W MANKINS, DEREK MARAGH, RAMA N & LOUISE L MARC & CYNTHIA CHAVANNE TRUST Q 3490 29TH AVE NE 1 ! 7451 SW 132ND AVE I 2317 FEATHER BROOK LN (L NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1586 ! MIAMI, FL 33183--- 3469 i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 • o N � OI MARENCO, MANUEL S & SHELBY E MARIA ROCIO MORA REV TRUST i ; MARIAN ZULLO REVOCABLE TRUST c 2636 41ST AVE NE I 1460 19TH ST SW I 2030 FAIRMONT LN N NAPLES, FL 34120 -0 NAPLES, FL 34117 --- 0 i NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4573 J a ! o Ln MARONDA HOMES LLC MARQUEZ, MARGARITA ! r MARRA, GIUSEPPE 00 v 9416 CAMDEN FIELD PKWY ( ANDRES FELIPE CASTRO DUSSAN AMBERLY NICOLE MARRA RIVERVIEW, FL 33569 --- 0 2124 PARSON ST 2223 DANCY ST N =p NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 -' MARTIN, DAN)ELLE & 10RDAN i MARTIN, KENNETH / MARTINEZ ACOSTA, ANGELICA 2062 MINNEOLA ST ROSHMI MISHRA i KARLA LLANAS MARTINEZ N NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 2374 ORCHARD ST i 3421 RANDALL BLVD c j NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 p i o i N CD MARTINEZ IVMORENO, ARNALDO MARTINEZ, ANTONIA MARTINEZ, ANTONIO d BARBARITA VALDES SANTOVENIA 3240 41ST AVE NE 2835 31ST AVE NE N 3290 EVERGLADES BLVD N ' NAPLES, FL 34120---1501 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4541 ea 'L NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 d a l MARTINEZ, ASHLEY _w_ J -MARTINEZ, BASILIO R & DIGNORA l MARTINEZ, BASILIO R& DIGNORA 28060 DOVEWOOD CT APT 105 3520 E 9TH CT i 3520 E 9TH CT (Uj BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135--- 87_1 HIALEAH, FL 33013--- 3118 � i HIALEAH, FL 33013--- 3118 ' m i s W i MARTINEZ, CARLOS i MARTINEZ CARLOS i MARTINEZ ELIGIO 4679 EVERGLADES BLVD NE ; 4679 EVERGLADES BLVD NE I i I 2580 37TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I ; NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1549 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7436 E label size l" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/81,60 'r4 _7 Ft!nnottA rlo fnrmat 95 mm u R7 mm r.mmnntihle aver. Avnrv@F1F(VR1Rn Packet Pg. 1033 09 t8/09 t5Q AJaAV oane 9lgltedLU03 LULLI L9 X Luca 96 teW)OI ap al12rlbIJ3 09,18/09t4o AaaAV UIIM aIglledLUOU „8/9 Z X „t ozls lagel i MARTINEZ, JESUS IGNACIO MARTINEZ, JORGE L 70 ISLE OF ST THOMAS i ! 3125 52ND ST SW NAPLES, FL 34114---0 ; i MAPLES, FL 34116- 8125 MARTINEZ, LUIS A i i i / MARTINEZ, LUIS FERNANDO l i i f SILVIA MILAGROS MARTINEZ I SANDRA ANGEL I 'r 9077 NW 113TH STREET i 50 LAWN AVENUE #28 i HIALEAH, FL 33018 --- 0 ! STAMFORD, CT 06902---0 MARTINEZ, RAYMUNDO ; , i MARTINEZ, REINALDO 6331 SW 151ST PL 2385 RANDALL BLVD MIAMI, FL 33193--- 2Y48 i i NAPLES, FL 34120--- 5518 ; MARTINEZ, RUBEN &'GLORIA i MARTINEZ, WILLIAM ! 3005 EVERGLADES BLVD N ! 2616 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34116 --- 0 I; ; NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1483 i MASE, CARL & NANCY MASON, VERONICA DENISE 2045 FAIRMONT LN MARLON FERNANDO MASON NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i 2313 FEATHER BROOK LANE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i i ; MASSEY, ROBERT & REBECCA i ( MAST, ROBERT M & CAROLEE A r 2068 HAMLIN ST 2107 VERMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i I ; NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i ; MATAMOROS, MARCIO SLADI'MIR i IVIATHEW,]OHN 1 ! 291129TH AVE NE ; JACOB JOHN MATHEW NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 82 CHESTNLIT ST ; LIVINGSTON, NJ 07039--- 5502 MAY, LAWRENCE E i 1 ; MAYSONET, LUIS i 4405 MACNISH ST APT 2D j i CHARLLOTTE DE LEON ELMHURST, NY 11373--- 3690 2084 HAMLIN ST i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MAllELLA, FRANCIS CARL ` MAZZOTTA, SEBASTAIN `ff DANIELA MARCELLA MAZZELLA i f JENNIFER MAZZOTTA I i 2115 VERMONT LANE I 7005 ROMANA WAY 41706 i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ; ; NAPLES, FL 34119-- 0 MC DERMOTT, ROBERT L i' i MCCLURE, CHAD PATRICK i 8 REX DR i I EMILY SUZANNE MCCLURE I CONCORD, NH 03303 --- 0 2151 VERMONT LANE j I �il NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I'I .3 ;i label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/816 �` " Ftinuotto rlo anrmat 9, mm v R7 mm rmmnatihlo aver Avery 051 9.A.4.c Owl MARTINEZ, LIDIA L 2385 39TH AVE NE r NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MARTINEZ, NELSON 2840 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1880 MARTINEZ, RICARDO 1929 WELLINGTON ST NAPLES, FL 34120---0 MARY RADOS REVOCABLE TRUST 555 18TH AVE S NAPLES, FL 34102 --- 0 MASSEY, CAROL 2322 WOODBRIDGE AVE EDISON, NJ 08817--- 5532 MATH, JOSE REYES 7369 NW 174TH TER APT 107 HIALEAH, FL 33015 --- 0 MATHEW, PARAMBIL C & ALEYAMMA 830 8TH ST SE NAPLES, FL 34117 2277 rnrR�rr MAZARIEGOS, T MAURICIO LUCAS 2472 SANTA BARBARA BLVD APT B NAPLES, FL 34116 --- 0 MC CRILLIS EST, GEORGE R % CHANTELLE MILLER 26465 COUNTY RD 74 EATON, CO 80615 --- 0 MCCRACKEN J R, ROBERT LEE 3330 31ST AVE NE # 68 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 2930 Packet Pg. 1034 MCDONALD, SHANE 2795 31ST AVE N E NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4477 MCGEE, MAGGIE 2465 HEYDON CIR E NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MCGUIRE, ROBERTJ 3986 GRANT AVE HAMBURG, NY 14075----2923 MCLEAN, DANIEL MARTIN SARAH KATHERINE MCLEAN 2402 HEYDON CIRCLE E NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MCREYNOLDS, MICHAEL GRIFFEN KRISTEN MICHELLE.LIMB 2218 VERMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120---0 0918/09190 A1aAV Dane algpedwoo ww Lg x ww 9Z teuuot ap 911a010 0018/09 tS0 AJaAV yllm algijedwoo „g/9 Z x „t azis lagei MCEWING, DAVID 2073 FAIRMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MEDINA, MINELVIS SIMPSON RICARDO ENRIQUE SUAREZ CHAVEZ NAOMY SUAREZ SIMPSON 2645 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 MELLUL, LISA & CHARLES 3020 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES; FL 34120 --- 0 MENA, J05E CASTRO YOAIMA MIRANDA NARDO 3240 EVERGLADES BVLD N NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MENDEZ, JUAN M MARIA I RAMIREZ-SANTANA 2535 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7406 MENENDEZ, PEDRO ISRAEL FERNANDEZ 7005 SW 21ST ST MIAMI, FL 33155 --- 0. 1�9 MCGILL, SEAN CHRISTOPHER 1870 ALAMEDA DR NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MCJA INVESTMENTS LLC 5355 CORAL WOOD DR NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 MCMILLAN, MICHAEL & SANDRA 6006 COTTAGE MILL DR WASHINGTON, MI 48094 --- 0 MEANEY, KEVIN & DONNA 2320 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MEJIA, RUBEN DIANA CRUZ 3225 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 449 MELD, ELIZABETH & CARLOS 1858 ALAMEDA DR NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MENA, NOEMI 264124TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3570 ssw.4E MCFADDEN, NICHOLASJOSEPH MELANIE ANNE MCFADDEN r 2378 HEYDON CIRCLE E NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 E MCGOWAN, ROBERT WILLIAM MARIA ELENA MCGOWAN 3260 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 MCKENZIE, HECTOR MARCIA HANIFORD MCKENZIE 4367 WICKHAM AVE BRONX, NY 10466 --- 0 MCMILLION, ALICEJ MARVIN CHARLES MCMILLION ARELYS MARIA MORTO 3270 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120--- 5595 MEANEY, RODGER G & CAROL ANN 2113 SATSUMA LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MEKEEL, BRIGETfE A & PATRICK D 1976 PARSON ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MENEJIAS, MARCELO -1 1 i MARICELA MENEJIAS LORENZO 2460 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1403 I� .. I MERAN, CARLOSJ l202 GOLDEN GATE BLVD W NAPLES, FL 34120---0 j j, III label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/8160 tfinIua++o Ao fnrmat 9F mm v F7 mm rmmnatihla avac Avary o51Fn/RiAn MELUCCI, MARIO MICHAEL 3460 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MENDEZ, FERNANDO CHAVEZ 218 22ND AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 'MENENDEZ, LOS ELVIRA ROMERO 3290 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3229 MERAN, CARLOSJ 202 GOLDEN GATE BLVD W NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 Packet Pg. 1035 MERCADO, MARCELO LILLIAN GUADALUPE 3125 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1700 MERVEILLE, ELISABETH 2645 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MESKE, DAVID B 2021 FAIRMONT LANE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MEZA; PEDRO 3845 41ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MICHAELIS, PAOLA MENDEZ 41118TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 6309 MILIAN, YOVANI QUIROS 2850 41ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MILLER, KURT C & LISA 2016 PARSON ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MINAYA, AYMEE JAVIER 0 MLLLAN 2590 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 0919/09150 AJaAV pane algltedwoo uilll L9 x uuU 9Z 1ewJ01 ap 0110ribll3 0519/09190 AIGAV LIJIM a1Q11eduloo „9/9 Z x „1 azis lagel MERCER, JEFFERY S & AMY M I I 1997 SAGEBRUSH CIR NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 jli I'', III I MERZEAU, GRACIELA 3665 29TH AVE NE i l II I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 2834 Ijl, I ( MESKE, DEBBIE A & MICHAEL K ' I 1894 ALAMEDA DR �I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 II I \ ( MGJ INVESTMENTS LLC I 3022 2ND ST NW I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 it i I II i j MICHALSKI, DANIEL CHARLES i JOANNA AGNES MICHALSKI 1 ANNA W PLUC. i I 2139 VERMONT LANE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i It� I I MILLER FAMILY TRUST I ! ( 1 ' 2150 CLEMENTINE ST ( j i NAPLES, FL 34120---0 MIRAMAR 50LUTION GROUP INC 2791 GOLDEN GATE BLVD E NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MIRAVISTA DEV CORD 4099 TAMIAMI TRAIL N #403 NAPLES, FL 34103---0 4m_sM MILLER, MORGAN & RYAN 2362 HEYDON CIR E NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4578 9.A.4.c 03- MERKOSKY, JENNIFER 1855 ALAMEDA DR r NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 E MESA, MAYTEE & LENIEL 1970 FAIRMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MESSINAJR, FRANK &SHERYLT 2004 SAGEBRUSH CIR NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4568 i MINER, JASON K & DESTINY R 144 WICKLIFFE DR NAPLES, FL 34110--0 I I I II MIRANDA, ANNABELLE M AGUSTIN MIRANDA I 256139TH AVE NE I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MIRELES SERVICES LLC l 112111THSTSW i it . NAPLES, FL 34117 --- 0 label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/8160 Ftiri'uatip rip. format 95 mm x R7 him ommnatihla aver, Avery 0,416n/8160 MIANO, KATHRYN 2820 41ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 MIGLIACCIO, JOSEPH CAROLYN PEREZ MIGUACCIO 2291 VERMONT LANE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MILLER, KEISHA 1959 FAIRMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MILO, BIANCA 1983 PARSON ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MINNIS, LAURA E JANE KITSON 2434 HEYDON CIRCLE EAST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MIRANDA, CHARLES 2460 37TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MISAS, ALBA M 12862 SW 134TH ST MIAMI, FL' 33186--- 4452 N c O 2 d o: C4 N o of of 0 N 0 N al rn <a O ' V IL V V m x W C d t v O a Packet Pg. 1036 MIXAN ET AL, JACOB D ROSEMARY H CHURCH CHARLES MIXAN ANTHONY MIXAN 6050 SEWARD ST OMAHA, NE 68104 --- 0 MOLERO, CEDRIC ENRibUE MUNOZ YESSIKA PAULA GONZALEZ PENA 2204 DANCY ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MOLINA, OTTO DAVID AVEIGA HEBERTO ARIAS BLANCO 2161 CLEMENTINE ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MONCRIEFFE, ANDRE S TAMEKA L MONCRtEFFE 2445 HEYDON CIR E NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MONTALBAN, ANGEL 3545 31ST NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 'MONTENEGRO, ORESTES CASAS 2370 39TH AVE, NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MONTOYA, PEDRO 8c ZENAIDA PO BOX 163321 MIAMI, FL 33116--- 3321 MOODY, ERIC 240431ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 442 MOONSAMMY, STACEY N 48 SUNNY ACRES RD #6 WALLKILL, NY 12589 --- 0 MOORE, STEVEN ALLEN ALANE KAE MOORE 1963 FAIRMONT LANE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 09tg/09t5@ (JaAV oane olgltedwoo ww Z9 x wul sz ►euJJo} ap attanblt3 09tg/09ISo /JaAV Balm algitedwoo „g/g Z x „l azls label MOCK, ZACHERY A 2480 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7540 ; i` MOLINA, ALEJANDRO I 2910 27TH AVE NE i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i I l�� MOLL, TAMMIY L 2129 CLEMENTINE STREET NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i , I iI iI MONTALBAN, ANGEL 3545 31ST AVE NE i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i i �i i : i i i ! �i• l: I� i i i 'MONTALVO, DAVID & MARIA B 2827 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1599 I� ii I! i i i ;i i i i 1` MORA, ARTURO MORALES i LETICIA SANCHEZ i 3964 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i, label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/8160 Ftim!atta rta fnrm.qt 95 mm x 67 mm nmmnatihle nvac Averv©A1rn/81R0 MONTEZ, MIGUEL A &ESMERALDA D 2725 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---1768 MONTOYA, RICARDO ANTONIO MONTOYA GAMBOA 2965 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MOOK, THEODORE FRANCIS & DANA 2346 HEYDON OR E NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MOORE UVFNGTRUSTTHE 97 ROSEDALE APARTMENTS HERSHEY, PA 17033 --- 0 MOISE, EVENS CHANCELINE BELLOT 2561 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MOLINA, AURORA 13737 SW 9TH TER MIAMI, FL 33184--- 3014 MOLONEDO, NILDA 3340 41ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---3210 MONTALBAN, ANGEL 3545 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4486 MONTALVO, WARISOL HENRY PEREZ 2042 MANDARIN LN NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4554 IVIONTICELLI, CARL CLAUDIA A MONTICELLI 2078 PARSON ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MONZON, JORGE 3332 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1777 MOONEY, ISOBEL H MOONEY WILLIAM E HANKINS E/O THOMAS H HANKINS 308 WILLRICH CIR UNIT E FOREST HILL, MD 21050--- 1362 MOORS, SCOTT 2099 VERMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MORAGA, J05E A 323124TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 Packet Pg. TO77] 09 G0/09 G5. hJaAV Dane algltedwoo ww Lg x ww 9Z teLu10! ap attagbit3 OOL9/09G9oAJaAV gtlm olq!ledwoo „0/5 Z x „G ozls loge) MORAGA, J.OSE A 323124TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MORALES, OTTO & KATHRYN 5601 CRAIN DALE DR ORLANDO, FL 32819---0 MORAN, SANDRA GERALDO ORTIZ 2416 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MORENO, ERIKA 9475 BRIGHT STAR DR MANASSAS, VA 20111 --- 0 MORENO, MARIO MARITZA MILAGROS MORENO 2920 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7459 MORGAN, JOSEPH M 2365 27TH AVE NE NAPLES; FL 34120 --- 0 MOO OSVA.LDO VERDECIA YAILEN SEGURA PENA 2968 41ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 MORTON, JEANNETTE ANN 2245 CARA CARA WAY NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MS2D LLC EJKW AMERICAS LLC 3288 HUNTINGTON FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33332 --- 0 MUNOZ, CLAUDIA 8104 NW 163RD TER MIAMI LAKES, FL 33016--- 6102 MORALES, FRANCISCO i 3523 27TH AVE NE , I•I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 �il ril. MORALES, RONALD A 27991 QUINN ST r BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135--- 5991 ; i 'I i MOREDA, EDUARDO i f LEIDA.MOREDA 5949 W 21ST CT HIALEAH, FL 33016 -2.634 �I MORENO, HENRY i MARIA K RIOS , 2005 FAIRMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4574 i j, MORGAN, CARA SUSANNA l� NOAHJACOB MORGAN 2244 DANCY ST NAPLES, FL 34120---0 i MORGAN, JULIA LOUISE JEREMYJOHN MORGAN i( BONNIE LOUISE BROWN 2246 VERMONT LN i r NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MORALES, LUIS ALBERTO VAZQUEZ LUIS MIGUEL VAZQUEZ HERNANDEZ 2980 41ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MORAN, LAZARO ALBERTO ESSY ELIANET SANCHEZ DE LATORRE, RAUL=& BARBARA 2530 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120---0 MOROTTO TR, J014N - r GOLDEN GATE EST REALTY TRUST 120 LEXINGTON ST WOBURN, MA 01801--- 4701 I � i \ MOSHER, ULRICH BRADLEY j NICOLE BOYLAN MOSHER 1966 FAIRMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 , MUINO, ALIEN ROY Ii 3528 EVERGLADES BLVD N I r NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I! MUNOZ, LINDA RACQUEL 2031 PARSON ST ; NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I, i label size 1" x 2 5/6" compatible with Avery 0'5160/81�60 Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm comoatible avec Avery 05160/8160 MORENO, CHRISTIAN JESSICA TARAPIELLA 2334 HEYDON CIR E NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MORENO, LEOSVEL MONTANO 2940 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MORGAN, FERNANDO & R08A 2145 SW 98TH AVE MIAMI, FL 33165---7519 MORKHANTHA, NINA BOUASAVANH N THEPHITHACK 2175 VERMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MORROW, CHRISTINA 252124TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3555 MOW INVESTMENTS LLC 3118TH ST NE NAPLES, FL 34120--0 MUNIZ, EDUARDO 10265 SW 93RD TER MIAMI, FL 33176---1619 MUNOZ, RAFAEL 4102 TRENTON AVE HOLLYWOOD, FL 33026--4924 Packet Pg. 1038 MUNRA PUBLIC ADJUSTERS INC 8215 N W 64TH ST STE 3 DORAL, FL 33166 --- 0 MUSE FAMILY TRUST 3736 ROBERT M GRISSOM PKWY #322 MYRTLE BEACH, SC 29577 --- 0 MYER, ERIC L & MARY M 2165 FAIRMONT LANE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NACIUS, THONiSE 3375 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 NAFDOF PRIVATE SERIES 1 2316 PINE RIDGE RD #453 NAPLES, FL 34109 --- 0 0919/091Sr- AJaAV oat�> olgitzdwoo wLLI L9 x LLIw gZ aeLuJot ap atlanbit3 09,G8/09190 Aj9AV ql!m algi}edwoo „g/g Z x „G azis lagei i MURILLO, SANDRA L 3563 W 93RD PL HIALEAH, FL 33018 --- 0 I'I 11 �i MUSLIMANI, RAY l ( PO BOX 110127 NAPLES, FL 34108 --- 103 I I I MYERS, LAUREN MICHELLE 1 TIMOTHY KEVIN MYERS 2105 CLEMENTINE STREET NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 � 'II NASSAR, MOHAMMED &JOHANNA 2073 SATSUMA LANE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAVARRO, SONIA 2465 41ST AVE NE NAPLES, FIL 34120 --- 0 NEDUMGOTTIL, SUMOLJ 8951 ROYAL DRIVE BURR RIDGE, IL 60527 --- 0 NELSON, RODNEY R & KATHLEEN L 2443 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7553 NGUYEN TRUST 7516 FRITATA AVE LAS VEGAS, NV 89113 --- 0 NAFDOF 22 LLC OR ASSIGNS 2316 PINE RIDGE RD #453 NAPLES, FL 34109 --- 0 NANCY JONES TRUST WAYNE H JONES TRUST 9605 S KEYSTONE DR LEE'S SUMMIT, MO 64086 --- 0 NAUGHTON, CHRISTOPHER LE'0 1867 ALAMEDA DR NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAWROCKI, BRENT ALEN STEPHANIE MOORE NAWROCKI 2012 PARSON ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NELIA E PEREIRA IRRV LIV TRUST 9645 SW 24TH ST # 1071 MIAMI, FL 33165---0 NEW LINE CONST & INVSfS LLC 19560 SW 134TH AVE MIAMI, FL 33177 --- 0 NICOLAS, BENCHY & MILDRED 3675 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 A.4.c90-91- MURRAY, RICHARD & MARIA 1 284124TH AVE NE r NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3524 MV MULTISERVICE INC 6823 LOCHNESS DRIVE MIAMI LAKES, FL 33014 ... 0 NACHAMPASSAK,ANOUVONG PHETHOUDONE L NACHAMPASSAK 2550 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--435 NAFDOF PRIVATE SERIES 1 LLC 2316 PINE RIDGE RD #453 NAPLES, FL 34109 --- 0 NARDOFF PRIVATE SERIES1 LLC 2316 PINE RIDGE RD #453 NAPLES, FL 34109 --- 0 NAVARRO, RICHARDS EDWINS U NURMIAN DEL VALLE RONDON 1916 WELLINGTON ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NEDDY CAPITAL LLC 8951 ROYAL DR BURR RIDGE, IL 60527 --- 0 NELSON, COREY & DEBORAH 2566 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NGIN, SOTHEARY SOK SOTHEAVY SOK NGIN 2207 VERMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NOEL, JOSEPH ROSEJEAN 3445 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1547 3 E label size V x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/81,60 I 6+,, i,n++, ,In fnrmot 0r n,m v E7 mm rmmnitihla auer. Avarvi@iinNR160 Packet Pg. 1039 NOEL, JOSEPH G 2470 41ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NOTO,BORAN BAYAN EBEID 8104153RD AVE HOWARD BEACH, NY 11414 --- 0 NUNEZ, DAISY 488 NE 18TH ST #i4501 MIAMI, FL 33132 --- 0 NUREDFNI, PELLUMB KRYSTEN MARIE NUREDINI 2252 DANCY Sl- NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 OBREGON, ADAM NESTOR IVONNE MUSTIGA 2196 VERMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120---0 OCHS INTERNATIONAL LLC 6363 ACHEIVEMENT AVE AVE MARIA, FL 34142 --- 0 061ESTE, RUTH R &JAMES IVAN 2340 37TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7542 OLD T04VNE CONSULTING INC 14991 SAVANNAH DR NAPLES, FL 34119--- 4803 OLIVERA, OSDEYMI- - YANIURKI MADRIGAL CASTRO 3451 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 09N/091-90 AJaAV cane 9lgpedru00 ulul L9 x WW 9Z IBUI.101 ap allaribIII 05g/0919r, rGaAV I.IIIM 9lgpedu100 „9/9 Z x ,, l aZls iagel NORMA FERNANDEZ P A FL CORP 12691 AVIANO DR I ! i NAPLES, FL 34119 --- Q i I1 i ill � 1 NOVOA, FABIANA ANDREINA MATTHEW CHRISTOPHER DUNHAM 2625 27TH AVE NE f NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 �I I ; NUNEZ, FRANCISCO A & ZAIDA I I 2460 29TH AVE NE l I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7540 III i� - NYACK, CYNTHIA I i ( MICHAEL P BENJAMIN 2106 SATSUMA LANE I i NAPLES, FL 34120---0 i OCAMPO SR, EDGARDO & ELVIRA 2904 UNIVERSITY AVE ! I ORANGE BLOSSOM RANCH COMMUNITY DEV DISTRICT WRATHELL HUNT & ASSOC LLC 2300 GLADES RD STE 410W BOCA RATON, FL 33431 --- 0 WAUKEGAN, IL 60085--- 3147 OFER, ABRAHAM JACOB CYNTHIA ANNE OFER 154 FARRINGTON AVE SLEEPY HOLLOW, NY 10591'---1305 OJEDA, FRANCISCO 243135TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1877 OLIVA, ENRIQUE 4680 SAINT CROIX LN APT 538 NAPLES, FL 34109--- 3565 OLSZEWSKI; DARIUSZ BOGUSLAW URSULA OLSZEWSKI 1022 61ST ST KENOSHA, WI 53143 --- 0 ORANGE BLOSSOM RANCH COMMUNITY DEV DISTRICT WRATHELL HUNT & ASSOC LLC 2300 GLADES RD STE 41OW BOCA RATON, FL 33431---0 9.A.4.c NORMIL, ANNETAL & TANJA 2386 HEYDON CIR E r NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NOWOTTNICK JR, JOHN & VALERIE 2094 SATSUMA LANE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NUNEZ 1UAN 1 & VIVIAN 248035TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 OBERLIES, DEBORAH L 2730 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 441 OCHOA, SANTO GIL 2485 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 OGDEN, MARGARET M 11 N HONEYMAN RD WHITE HSE STA, NJ 08889--- 3635 OLAN JR, DIRK ALFONSO DORA ANGELA SUAREZ 1866 ALAMEDA DR NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 OLIVA, MAYLA 3230 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120--- 5595 ONTRAC AMERICA INC 4229 GERMANTOWN AVE PHILADELPHIA, PA 19140-1743 ORANGE BLOSSOM RANCH DOMMUNITY DEV DISTRICT WRATHELL HUNT & ASSOC LLC 2300 GLADES RD STE 41OW BOCA RATON, FL 33431 --- 0 3 E E label size 1" x 2 518" compatible with Avery 05160/8160 r+a+n-mot 9r mm v F7 mm rmmnatihla auar Avnry @61f,NRirn Packet Pg. 1040 0918/091'q©AJ9AV oane alcipudwoo WLu L9 x ww 9Z IewJol ap 91196bll3 09 �8/09 G90 1�J8At/ 4I!n� alQlledwoo „S/4 Z x „G ails lagel ORANGE SRMR LLC ORANGE SRMR LLC 27700 HICKORY BLVD 27700 HICKORY BLVD BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 I i ORTA, GABRIEL EDUARDO i ORTEGA, CHRISTOPHER J I i ANDRELIS RAMIREZ I ; 19 FRANK ST 2092 HAMLIN ST i ' AGAWAM, MA 01001---0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ' i ORTEGA, RAUL 8t NOILA ( ORTEGA, RAY & ROSEMARY 5941 NW 192ND ST PO BOX 226572 I HIALEAH, FL 33015--- 5025 j ; MIAMI, FL 33222--- 6572 i. ORTIZ, JUAN M & TAMARA D ! 1 OSBOf2N, ZACHAftY P 326124TH AVE NE i I 2870 41ST AVE NE NAPLES,"FL 34120--3595 ! I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1580 i ! OWENS, DALE L & LORY L P&J FLORIDA LLC 2206 HEYDON CIR W i ( 175 GREAT NECK RD STE 407 NAPLES, FL 34120- 0 ! I i ! GREAT NECK, NY 11021 --- 0 1 ! PADRON, ARMANDO E & PAULA O PALACIO, JUAN & VIVIAN ORTEGA i r 12851 NW 2ND ST i 2461 EVERGLADES BLVD N MIAMI, FL 33182---1103 i NAPLES, FL 34120--- 5540 i ! i PALACIOS,MILSA S' PALACIOS, PEDRO D & LUDY V JUAN M PALACIOS 201 PORTER STREET 3843 EVERGLADES BLVD N i NAPLES, FL 34113 --- 0 i NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1531 i 1 ` PALMA, ALEX PALUMBO, LOUISE ERICA VELASQUEZ 148 RAFF AVE 3330 35TH AVE NE i MINEOLA, NY 11501--- 3119 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i WADOPOOLOS PO BOX 265 BIRMINGHAM, MI 48012 --- 0 PARISI, STEPHEN ANTHONY ANDREA ELISABETH PARISI 2368 ORCHARD ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 W_Pww�El ORR, CECILIA &THOMAS 2247 DANCY ST r NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 c ORTEGA, HECTOR F 2720 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---441 ORTIZ, ARMANDO EMMA GUERRA 268137TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 OTTO, KELSEY MARIE 1886 ALAMEDA DR NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 PADILLA, JAIME L 3413 TISDALE DR LEXINGTON, KY 40503--- 4234 PAIACIO, JUAMITA M JOAQUIN C PALACIO JUANA PALACIO 622 E RIDGE VILLAGE DR CUTLER BAY, FL 33157 --- 0 PALECEK, EDWARD 1 & MARILYN R PO BOX 535 LINTHICUM HTS, MD 21090 --- 535 li i l 1 i PAPOLCZY, H`EIDI E � 2480 27TH AVE NE i NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7410 ! i PARKER, MARK A & PAMELA M 15911 BANCROFT CT # 826 1 OMAHA, NE 68130 --- 0 I; label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 1%160/8160 GtGinn+io rle fnrmat 9F mm v A7 mm rnmr)ONA aver AvPrwe. iRrUR1R0 PANTUN, ANGELLA D 2310 HEYDON CIR W NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 PARDO, PEDRO & MERCEDES D 2910 GOLDEN GATE BLVD W NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1738 ' PARKER, MARK A & PAMELA M 15911 BANCROFT CT #826 OMAHA, NE 68130 --- 0 Packet Pg. 1041 PARKER, PETER 2403 HEYDON CIR E NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 PARMAR, KIRPALS SARBJEET 'K PARMAR 3660 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7812 PARSONS, DAILIS 3491 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 PAW LOWSKA, TEKLA BOGDANJAN PAWLOWSKI 2271 VERMONT LANE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 PEARSEY, JANE BLACKMORE 256124TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3555 PFUER, EDDY DURAN ANAVEL ESTEVEZ TIRADO 2525 37TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7437 PENA, FRANKLORENZO RANGEL MARIELBA LEON. DE RANGEL FRANK A RANGEL LEON 2093 HAMLIN ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 PENDER,FAYEYOUNG 2145 WOODBERRY RUN DR SNELLVILLE, GA 30078--- 5674 PERALTA, RAFAEL A & DIONISIA 9230 54TH AVE ELMHURST, NY 11373---0 PERDOMO, JULIO C LEIDY D PERDOMO ZAVALA 4065 N EVERGLADES BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 09 LR/09 Leo A.iOAV oaAE aigiledwoo ulW 19 x ww gZ lewJoJ ap allob,bll3 09;LR/09Lg@ AJOAV LillM olglleduioo „R/5 Z x „L azls lapel PARKINSON, KENNETH R CATHERINE PARKINSON 2234 HEYDON CIR W j NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4584 i i PARMAR, KIRPAL S & SARBJEST 3660 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7812 i ! I'II (' MUCK, JOHN J & KAREN M i I 2980 NW STACIE CT ! ROSEBURG, OR 97471---8838 PAYANO, RAFAEL l MAYRA C HENRIQUEZ YORENNY M HORNE i 3230 29TH AVE NE i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 !! Ji PECORELLA, KEVIN R & CAROLYN A 2192 VERMONT LN i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i i i i PELLETIER, MON DANIEL BRITTANY PELLETIER 2394 HEYDON CIRCLE E NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ( PENA, HAYDE i I LIBERTAD SUAREZ 6745 SW 26TH TER ' I MIAMI, FL 33155---2909 ! ! !j I! Il ! PENKALA,FRANCES C/O CHERYLJANAKUS 18W521 S FRONTAGE RD LEMONT, IL 60439--- 8604 i l ! ! ' PERALTA, TONY J BEATO i ( SOLANGE BRITO DE SEATO 2603 41ST AVE NE ! NAPLES, FL 34120---0 ! �!l J! PEREIRA, ESTEFANIA 2239 DANCY ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i it ! I! i label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/81t'60 Ftinnatta rla tnrmat 95 mm Y R7 mm r.mmnatihle avar. Avary o51 Rom R0 umgA.4.c:' PARMAR REV LIVING TRUST 1464 SUTTER BUTTES ST r CHULA VISTA, CA 91913 --- 0 PARODI, ARSENIO ANTONIA LOPEZ 1886 SW 16TH TER MIAMI, FL 33145---1433 PATTEN, ROY E & ROBERTA T 16105 RIGGS RD . STILWELL, KS 66085--- 9256 PAZ, LINDA L 755 NW 80TH ST MIAMI, FL 33150 --- 0 PECORELLA, RYAN & REGINA R 2232 DANCY ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 PENA, DULCE M PARRA 3274 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 448 FENA,ROBERTO 2064 SAGEBRUSH CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 PENTZ,BETHANN 15 RED MILL ROAD ETTERS, PA 17319--- 1103 PERDOMO LUIS, YULEIVYS JUAN C MARTINEZ ROCHE 2286 HEYDON CIR W NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4584 PEREIRA, RUDYARD SAUCEDO 11925 COLLIER BLVD STE 102 NAPLES, FL 34116---0 Packet Pg. 1042 PERERA, JULIO SANDRA ANGARITA 3675 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 PEREZ, ANTONIO & ERMIZ 2865 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 490 PEREZ, CARLOS & MARIAA 3430 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 PEREZ, ELIADES & ANA 3645 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34117 --- 0 PEREZ, GUDELIA 2630 SW 19TH ST MIAMI, FL 33145 --- 0 PEREZ, HENRY 2042 MANDARIN LN NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4554 PEREZ, JOSE LUIS NENYSTORO 3945 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120---0 PEREZ, MIRTHA 2625 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1406 ---PEREZ, PEDRO DENISSE CALDERON OTAMENDY 6365 COLLINS AVENUE UNIT 3406 MIAMI BEACH, FL 33141 --- 0 PERONA, MICHAEL & 9ARBARA E 739 JAQUES AVE RAHWAY, NJ 07065--- 3831 09t8/091gcD AJ@AV Dane 9lgpedi1J00 ww L9 x U1W 9Z tawaot ap attari 19 09L8/0915@ AJ9AV qpm algltedwoo,, 9/9 Z x „R azls laci l i PEREZ, ANGEL &TANIA ! 2970 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1489 I i i Ii l PEREZ, ARMANDOT 2330 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I PEREZ, DAREINE 2920 27TH AVE NE i i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 �I PEREZ, ELIO" 1 I 298124TH AVE NE i NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3545 lip I _ I - ` PEREZ, GUDELIA 2630 SW 19TH ST MIAMI, FL 33145 --- 0 i i III PEREZ, JORGE LUIS GONZALEZ DIANA WALESKA VARGAS 2123 55TH TERRACE SW 2 NAPLES, FL 34116 --- 0 - PEREZ, JUAN MIGUEL" 1 2914 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---4505 i II I , PEREZ, OMAR DIAS (i LUZ CASTRO 2780 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 PEREZ,'RAFAEL I i 17220 SW 146TH CT MIAMI, FL 33177---6622 I� PERRY, RAYSHAWN LAMORRIS GINA MARIE GORDON 2095 VERMONT LN i ' NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/8160 FtiriilPtta rla format 9.r, mm x R7 mm nmmnatihla aver. Avery P51RO/RiGO 9.A.4.c xr- PEREZ, ANGEL & TANIA ROSA PEREZ r 2980 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 PEREZ, BAISIA RAUL DIAZ MORALES 2485 41ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 2805 PEREZ, DIANE & AURELIO 2710 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 PEREZ, ESTRELLA YANLHEISER R GONZALEZ 2575 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1404 PEREZ, HECTOR DANIEL 2715 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---1881 PEREZ, JOSE 2141 NE 179TH ST N MIAMI BCH, FL 33162---0 PEREZ, L1 SET-FE 3720 8TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 PEREZ, OSCAR OSMAYDY FERNANDEZ DANIELA PEREZ FERNANDEZ 2710 27TH AVE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 PEREZ, RICHARDS " 5820 NE 22ND WAY #603 FORT LAJDERDALE, FL 33308 --- 0 PERSKY LIVING TRUST 2454 HEYDON CIR E NAPLES, FL 341.20 --- 0 N C O 'N o; N N O O o, o! O a L IL V V m k W C d t a' Packet Pg. 1 3 PETERS, AMY K 2514 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 PETEES, MARSHAWN D 18234 COYLE ST DETROIT, MI 48235 --- 0 PHAN, NAM V 45 HARTFORD AVE DRACUT, MA 01826 --- 0 PIERSON, LEONARD MARTIN VICKY LEE PIERSON 2143 VERMONT LANE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 PIMENTEL, JOHN 2730 NE 41 PLACE HOMESTEAD, FL 33033 --- 0 PINEDA SR, JOSS G 3585 33RD AVE NE, NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 PINTO, JOSE E & CECILIA 2575 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 PIRO, PETER) 701 INLET DR MARCO ISLAND, FL 34145--- 5940 PISTORIO EST, ANGELINE 7980 N NOB HILL RD APT 108 TAMARAC, FL 33321--- 7406 POGAN, WILUAM C TEAGAN J DOYLE 3735 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 091.8/09 t§o AJaAV oaAs alglledwoo uau C9 x wuJ 921ewaol Op allarjbil3 09G8/09f9oAa0AV ql!m alglledwoo „8/9 Zx j azls lagel PETIT -JEAN, JUNIOR & LEANDER C 2198 HEYDON CIR W NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 PHAM,"DUCTHANH & HOATHI 3360 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3246 PHILLIPS, ANA M TIMOTHY L PHILLIPS 2270 VERMONT LANE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 PIERSON, TASHA M 2415 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 =L��D PETRICH, JACK & DIANA 119 HEWITT BLVD A CENTER MORICHES, NY 11934 --- 0 } ( PIMENTEL, JOSEPH & THANH-THUY 1 i 4620 SW 148TH TER MIRAMAR, FL 33027--- 3322 i i I i - PIN EDA, MARIA FERNANDA 8534 W SOUTHGATE SHORES CIR I i TAMARAC, FL 33321 --- 0 �I i l' PIPES, JOHN W & LISA C 2056 SAGEBRUSH CIR i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i i : iI 1 � i PISANO, ERNEST & PATRICIA i i I 2213 HEYDON CIRCLE W NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i PITT JR, JOHN THOMAS MARY BETH LORENZ 1720 STEAM ENGINE KENTWOOD, MI 49508 --- 0 i POOLE ZACHARY T & MELISSA D i 2710 37TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 II i label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/8160 Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 195160/8160 PHAM, NHAN T BACH LIEU THI HUYNH 3285 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1565 PICHARDO, JHONY N YOSELYN J NUNEZ 7720 NW 86TH WAY TAMARAC, FL 33321 --- 0 PIIRAK, AILEEN K ENE PIIRAK 132 MAYWOOD DR SYRACUSE, NY 13205--- 2402 PIMPiNELLA-, CATHY 46 MULBERRY AVE STATEN ISLAND, NY 10314---0 PINEDA, MARCO A " 2875 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7432 PIRIZ, MONICA RODRIGUEZ 299124TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 PISKADLO, EDWARD & CYNTHIA 20 DARIAN CT STERLING, VA 20165 --- 0 PLINER-RENE, ARLENE ROMAN PERSAUD 14620 S W 87 CT PALMETTO BAY, FL 33176 --- 0 POPA,JOHN 1151 JUNIPER AVE AKRON, OH 44310--- 1246 Packet Pg. 1044 POREMBA REVOCABLE TRUST 2009 FAIRMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4574 POKY, MICHAEL & CARA 2170 CLEMENTINE ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 POWERS, WALTER 8, GERALDINE 330 EAKER PL DES PLAINES, IL 60016--- 6037 PRESANZANO, KIMBERLY C 21528 BRIXHAM RUN LOOP ESTERO, FL 33928--- 3287 PRICE, JOHN I 2197 HEY DON CIR W NAPLES, FL 34120---4583 PROFIT CORP 15317 SW 69TH LN MIAMI, FL 33193 --- 0 PRONOVOST, LAWRENCE JOSEPH SHARON LYNN PRONOVOST 2071 VERMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120-.-0 PRZYGODSKI, JOEL DONNY PRZYGODSKI LESLEE PRZYGODSKI 513 RED MAPLE DR TECUMSEN, MI 49286 --- 0 PYATT, MICHAEL D & LEE A 2122 CLEMENTINE STREET NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 QUENALLATA, LUIS FERNANDO ANA OROZCO 4237 SW 147 COURT MIAMI, FL 33185 --- 0 09I8/091.98 kOAV oane apiRdwoo Luw Zq x ww 9Z Jew.101 ap 911ar'bpo 0918/oMe AnAV uI!rn alglledwoo „9/9 Z x „t azls lagel PORTAL, XIOMARA 2395 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7558 POSTIGO, CARLOS RICARDO 2731 NE 3RD DR UNIT 205 I i i HOMESTEAD, FL 33033--- 7085 ; ; PRAT, MARIA ESTHER j 3272 33RD AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i ; PREVATT, DANNYJUSTIN JESSICA MARIE PREVATT 2453 HEYDON CIR E NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 PRIETO, CHRISTINA A 2445 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 7493 PROGRESS RES BORROWER 2 LLC PO BOX 4090 SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85261 --- 0 PROSKURNIA, STANISLAW & KAREN 2183 VERMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 PULIDO, NELSON SERGIO BARBARA PULIDO 62 FARNHAM SQUARE SAYREVILLE, NJ 08859---0 wlw4.D PORTER, JOSEPH E & MARY JANE 4789 HAYGOOD POINT RD r VIRGINIA BEACH, VA 23455--- 4748 E POTEET, NATHAN ISSAC NICOLE VONDERAU POTEET 2118 SATSUMA LANE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 PRATO, STEVEN & KATHERINE 32715TH AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 PRIAS, JORGE A & PATRICIA M 3830 WEST 11TH AVE HIALEAH, FL 330127--0 PRIETO, FELIX FELIX U PRIETO 2445 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7493 PROGRESS RES BORROWER 2 LLC PO BOX 4090 SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85261 --- 0 QUENALLATA, LUIS IERNANDO ANA OROZCO 4237 SW 147 COURT MIAMI, FL 33135 --- 0 !il QUENALLATA, LUIS FERNANDO 1 ANA OROZCO i 4237 SW 147 COURT � MIAMI, FL 33185--0 i label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/81160 Etiquette de format 25 mm'x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 05160/8160 Kurt TANKER D & LUCY 2995 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 PULIDO, SARA 8252 NW 6TH TERRACE #246 MIAMI, FL 33126 --- 0 QUENALLATA, LUIS FERNANDO ANA OROZCO 4237 SW 147 COURT MIAMI, FL 33185 --- 0 QUIGLEY, THOMAS & ANGELA 2058 MANDARIN LN NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4554 Packet Pg. 1045 QUINN, JOHN E & AMY W 2 GLEN LOCH WAY MALVERN, PA 19355--- 1956 R & R PARADISE PROPERTIES LLC 2660 8TH AVE SE NAPLES, FL 34117---0 RAGAN, JOHN DAVID & LESLIE 2240 DANCY ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 RAMIREZ, JOSE & AIDA 5882 W 2ND CT HIALEAH, FL 33012---2611 RAMIREZ, MARIA L 3440 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1562 RAMIREZ, YOANDRY E 3365 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 RAMOS, JOSE M & MARIA A 3635 31STIAVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 RAMOS, OLGA 5178 GENOA ST AVE MARIA, FL 34142 --- 0 RANCH AT ORANGE BLOSSOM MASTER ASSOCIATION INC % KEB MGMT SERVICES 6017 PINE RIDGE RD # 262 NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 RANCH AT ORANGE BLOSSOM MASTER ASSOCIATION INC %KEB MGNT 6017 PINE RIDGE RD #262 NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 0gL8/0gi.a8 (JaAV oaAe olgltedwoo uiw L9 x ww gZ tenof op altarjbu 05G0/09 L9©A1aAV ytlM algldedwoo „9/9 Z x „t azls lapel QUINONES, REYNALDO & LILIANA i 2645 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---1484 .I r R F BERMAN REV TRUST OF 2012 611 1ST SW I NAPLES, FL 34117 --- 0 !I it I !I RAMAKRISHNA SURAPANENI AND ! LAKSHMI SURAPANENI LIV TRUST i 1982 FAIRMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ll I .I RAMIREZ, JOSE R & NEYSI 1 460 24TH AVE NE I ! I i NAPLES, FL 34120--- 2388 i Ii �I ! RAMIREZ, MITCHELL I (' 1 365015TH AVE S W I!I NAPLES, FL 34117 --- 0 RAMIREZ-CRUZ, MARCO A FRANCISCA RODRIGUEZ-GAMBOA 2398 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 RAMOS, JOSEFINO 2370 41ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 2813 RANCH AT ORANGE BLOSSOM MASTER ASSOCIATION INC % KEB MGMT SERVICES 6017 PINE RIDGE RD # 262 NAPLES, FL 34110---0 RANCH AT ORANGE BLOSSOM MASTER ASSOCIATION INC %KEB MGNT 6017 PINE RIDGE RD #262 NAPLES, FL 34119--=0 RANCH AT ORANGE BLOSSOM MASTER ASSOCIATION INC %KEB MGNT 6017 PINE RIDGE RD #262 NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 QUINTERO, ANA C 5941 SW 185TH WAY r SOUTHWEST RANCHE, FL 33332--- 1477 R P & M D BELL REV TRUST 58 NORTH COLLIER BLVD #414 MARCO ISLAND, FL 34145 --- 0 RAMIREZ, BARBARA 3030 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1574 RAMIREZ, KARLA M MENDEZ RAFAEL DE LA CRUZ 2235 VERMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 RAMIREZ, OSCAR FEFKANDO GUZMAN 1850 ALAMEDA DR NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 RAMOS, ARIEL 2748 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 441 RAMOS, ODALIS N AMBROCIO RAMOS 3310 41ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 RANCH AT ORANGE BLOSSOM MASTER ASSOCIATION INC % KEB MGMT SERVICES 6017 PINE RIDGE RD # 262 NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 RANCH AT ORANGE BLOSSOM MASTER ASSOCIATION INC %KEB MGNT. 6017 PINE RIDGE RD #262 NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 RANCH AT ORANGE BLOSSOM MASTER ASSOCIATION INC %KEB MGNT 6017 PINE RIDGE RD #262 .NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 Q label size V x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/81.60 Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery °5160/8160 Packet Pg. 1046 9.A.4.c 01 RANCH AT ORANGE BLOSSOM MASTER ASSOCIATION INC %KEB MGNT 6017 PINE RIDGE RO #262 NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 RAPACCIUOLO, DAVID & JACQUELIN 2075 SAGEBRUSH CIR NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4569 RCSL IRREVOCABLE TRUST 8 EAGLE GLENN COVE LITTLE ROCK, AR 72223 --- 0 REIFF, RYAN A & JENNIFER A 2087 SAGEBRUSH CIR NAPLES, FL - 34120--- 4569 RENDA, MICHAEL & MARIA 11 PEARL ST WHITE HSE STA, NJ 08889---3632 RENE, ONE KINGS SHAMOY GRACE RENE 2977 41ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 REQl1ENA, ALFREDO J & BARBARA JOSE A REQUENA 2059 SAGEBRUSH CIR NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4569 REVOREDO, ALFREDO 1 IRAIDA REVOREDO 224 POCATELLA ST MIAMI SPRINGS, FL 33166--- 5009 REYES, PERFECTO L & MARTA R 231 SW 119 AVE MIAMI, FL 33184 --- 0 REYMARRE CORP 821NW32CT MIAMI, FL 33125 --- 0 0918/0915o AMV Dane alglfeduioo ulul L9 x uJul 9Z ILwjof ap attaribll3 0918/0919©hJaAV g11M a1g11edwoo „8/9 Z x „ j azis lagel i i RANCH AT ORANGE BLOSSOM MASTER ASSOCIATION INC %KEB MGNT i 6017 PINE RIDGE RD #262 NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 RAPHAEL, MARIE M WILLY EDOUARD 288020TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 REGALADO M DE LA CARIDAD Z MIRIEL PULIDO GUERRA 2080 16TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 REINA, JORGE E 2370 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120--- 5517 RENDA, MICHAEL & MARIA 11 PEARLST WHITE HSE STA, NJ 08889--- 3632 RENGIFO, MONICA MARIET LUIS JAVIER RENGIFO 1920 WELLINGTON ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 RESTREPO, LUIS A 2889INLET COVELN W NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 REYES, MARTHA ROCHE ELPIDIO NARANJO 2675 37TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i REYES, ROBERTO ' I 3330 33RD AVE NE I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1538 i I I I i Il REYNOLDS ANDRE is j 2160 FAIRMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120---4575 j I ,I �i label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 0'5160/8160 Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 4160/8160 RANKIN, YALLEN AGUILA 2720 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 RAUBA, CORD 9653 OGDEN CT THORNTON, CO 80029---0 REGALADO, RAQUEL 9517 SW 138 PLACE #9517 MIAMI, FL 33186 --- 0 RENA LOU WILSON 6035 NORTH WATERBURY ROAD DES MOINES, IA 50312---0 RENDON, CLAUDIA A SIERRA 2227 DANCY ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 REWTERIA, MARIA G HILARIO ROGRIGUEZ-MENDEZ 2980 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4505 REVEL LAND TRUST 2360 ORCHARD ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 REYES, PAOLA A 3245 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 REYES, TOMAS A 8& JUANA R 2845 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120--- 5590 RIBISI, CHRISTIAN & NORMA 3415 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 Packet Pg. 1047 09 to/091�@ A)9AV oane aigpedwoo wul Lg x ulw gZ lewaol ap 9119rjN13 09lL8/0915o fxAOAV ql!M 9lq!jPdLU03,,9/9 Z x j azls lagel RICHARD FRANKLIN BERMAN TRUST RICO, JOHNNY RICARDO 611 1ST ST SW VICTORIA SOLORIO ARREGUIN NAPLES, FL 34117 --- 0 2810 29TH AVE NE i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 RIENZI, MARIA A GRAHAM MARCUS 2154 CLEMENTINE ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 RIOS, NICHOLAS & MAGALYS 128 NE 26TH TER HOMESTEAD, FL 33033 --- 0 RIQUELME, ANGELJESUS NICOLETTE RIQUELME 237135TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 RIM-RIVERA, CARLOSA' JACLYN PROFFITr 5111 GENOA ST AVE MARIA, FL 34142 --- 0 RIVERA, GABRIEL N & JOANNA 3275 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---3204 RIVERO, FANNY BUSTAMANTE 2348 ORCHARD ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ROBBINS II, DONALD SHERWOOD RENATA ROBBINS 2285 VERMONT LANE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 ROBERTS, MICHAEL D & DEBORAH A 313 HIDDEN RIDGES CT COMBINED LOCKS, WI 54113---0 ROBLESJR, CHRISTINO &TATIANA 2940 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120---0 wi4nWE RILEY, RILEY & ROSE A 2206 VERMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120---0 RIPLEY, CHARLES E & DEBORAH 2294 HEYDON CIR W NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4584 RISCH, ALEXIS L ROBERTO MARTINEZ 2965 41ST AVE N E NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 RIVENBURG, MITCHELL DEVIAN 3199 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 RIVERA, IVAfJ R & WzABETH C PO BOX 139 SABANA SECA, PR 00952 --- 0 1 i RIVERO, OSVALDO &YAQUELIN i JESSICA RIVERO EDY MONTERO 3580 29TH AVE NE i i NAPLES, FL 34117 --- 0 ROBERT L HILLJR FAMILYTRUST 1 r 985 1ST AVE S NAPLES, FL 34102 --- 0 i ! i ROBINSON, ASHLEY i CLIFTON T ROBINSON i 2043 SAGEBRUSH CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 ! I ! ROCKS, RACHAEL G & JONATHAN C 2457 HEYDON CIR E i ! NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i i i label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/81:60 Etig'Uette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 0�160/8160 RIDER, DANIEL 2148 FAIRMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 RINER, JAMES C 3565 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1557 RIPOLL, KENNY SYLVIAY MALDONADO 2352 ORCHARD STREET NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 RIVADENEIRA, FERNANDO 3390 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 RIVERA, ANTONIA 3595 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 RIVERA, KRYSTINAJ 3290 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120--- 5595 RIB CAPITAL LLC 501 GOODLETTE RD N STE D-100 NAPLES, FL 34102 --- 0 ROBERTS, MARK 2660 OIL WELL RD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ROBINSON, MUL & ALDITH' 2895 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7432 RODRIGUEZ TR, JUAN C ZENAIDA M RODRIGUEZTR 12425 SW 88TH CT MIAMI, FL 33176--- 52.13 Packet Pg. 1048 RODRIGUEZ, ABRAHAM E VALERIE MAGILEWSKI 2670 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 RODRIGUEZ, ARIAN ANA CJUSTINIANO 2323 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 RODRIGUEZ, EDGAR & ANA M 2157 FAIRMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120---0 RODRIGUEZ; FRANCISCO 2390 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 2920 RODRIGUEZ, JORGE L & ANABEL 3160 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 RODRIGUEZ, LAZARA-MUNOZ 3229 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 RODRIGUEZ, RICARDO 3220 41ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1501 RODRIGUEZ-DE VEER, GAVIENE M N EMILY RODRIGUEZ URQUIOLA 2992 41ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ROJAS, DAVID F ADRIANA ESTEVEZ 2530 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ROMAIN, CLARK ELDER 2220 DANCY ST NAPLES, FL 34.120 --- 0 09t9/091�©AJMV pane algpedwoo ww L9 x ww 4Z aewaof ap allanblt� O9G8/09L9@ ICJ@AV LIJIM algltedwoo „9/9 Z x „f azls label RODRIGUEZ, ABRAHAM MELENDEZ i ! MARISOL MELENDEZ MAYRA ROMERO MELENDEZ SENON ROMERO HERNANDEZ 2860 RANDALL BLVD l NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I• i RODRiGUEZ, CAIVlILO 2385 31ST AVE NE i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 443 i RODRIGUEZ, EMIL i (i LADY JOHANA RODRIGUEZ I : 2627 37TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 li l' RODRIGUEZ, JAVIER & ERIKO M \ i 331135TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1516 _ 1 i RODRIGUEZ, JOSE ALBERTO `• I�I ANDRES RODRIGUEZ I 16357 SW 68TH TER, MIAMI, FL 33193--- 4441 i, l� 010E] RODRIGUEZ, ALBERTO &JUANA M 2560 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7407 RODRIGUEZ, CHRISTOPHER L 2144 FAIRMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4575 RODRIGUEZ, FERDINAND VIRGINIA RODRIGUEZ 7426 SURREY WOOD LN APOLLO BEACH, FL 33572 --- 0 RODRIGUEZ, JESSENIA 7169 W 4 WAY HIALEAH, FL 33014 --- 0 RODRIGUEZ, JUAN C 2488 37TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34109 --- 0 RODRIGUEZ, NAZARIO D ! RODRIGUEZ, PRAXEDIS MIRTHA RODRIGUEZ i 2640 EVERGLADES BLVD N 8101 SW 12TH ST NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1526 MIAMI, FL 33144--- 4325 �II RODRIGUEZ, ROSAA �l , RODRIGUEZ-AMADO, ARIEL M 2520 29TH AVE NE i MARIA CAROLINA MONSALVE-1ASPE NAPLES, FL 34120---7407 i 2192 DANCY ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ROE, MICHAEL ALAN & TARA JEAN i 11 , 1 ROJAS, ARLEY LOPEZ 3390 31ST AVE NE i KATIUSKA BALBERAN ALMEIDA NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i i 2985 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I ROJAS, JUDITH i ROJAS, RAUL A & ELVIA MICHELHERRERA-MACIAS I 1687 SW 136TH PL 3920 EVERGLADES BLVD N i MIAMI, FL 33175--- 1052 NAPLES, FL 34120---0 ROMEO, GEORGEANNE E �l I ' ROMERO, C IVIARISELA MIJANaO 2525 39TH AVE NE i i : 3745 41ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 0'5160/8160 1 Etiquette cle format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery °.�160/8160 Packet Pg. 1049 091.8/09t5rr, AJaAV 09A2 algtt2dwoo WLU L9 x ulul gZ Iewn) ap aitaribg3 09L8/091Sc, AJaAV gllM alglaedwoo „g/g Z x „G azis lagel i ROMERO, KATHERINE M ROMULUS, ROBERSON JUNIOR CELINA M MIJANGO ; j 2865 39TH AVE NE 3745 41ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1440 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ROPPO,VITO ABIGALE .i ROQUE, YOVANNIS 3745 29TH AVE NE I i MONICA E SATO ROQUE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 2826 i ' 2262 HEYDON CIRCLE W NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ROSADO, OMAR & VICTORIA N l i ROSILLO SR, JOSE L 3375 RANDALL BLVD I ; 2520 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120-•--0 I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3694 ROSS, MICHELLE I I ; ; I' ROSS[, BRETT P & AMBER L• 3630 29TH AVE NE i I 2230.HEYDON CIR W NAPLES, FL - 34120--- 2833 I! NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ROWE, CHRISTINE C j� ROY, ANDREW D ROBERT N ROWE JR 2011 SAGEBRUSH CIR 4417 RED HOLLY CT NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 CHARLOTTE, NC 28215--- 9001 I I I I RP ORANGE BL0550M OWNER LLC I I I RP ORANGE BLOSSOM 01NNER LLC I % ROCKPOINT GROUP LLC I i % ROCKPOINT GROUP LLC 3953 MAPLE AVE # 300 I ; 3953 MAPLE AVE # 300 CALLAS, TX 75210 --- 0 ; ( CALLAS, TX 75210---0 RP ORANGE BLOSSOM OWNER LLC r RP ORANGE BLOSSOM OWNER LLC I % ROCKPOINT GROUP LLC % ROCKPOINT GROUP LLC 3953 MAPLE AVE # 300 i 3953 MAPLE AVE # 300 CALLAS, TX 75210 --- 0 CALLAS, TX 75210 --- 0 RP ORANGE BLOSSOM OWNER LLC i RP ORANGE BLOSSOM OWNER LLC % ROCKPOINT GROUP LLC I % ROCKPOINT GROUP LLC 3953 MAPLE AVE # 300 3953 MAPLE AVE # 300 CALLAS, TX 752107-0 li CALLAS, TX 75210 --- 0 RP ORANGE BLOSSOM OWNER LLC i + RP ORANGE BLOSSOM OWNER LLC I % ROCKPOINT GROUP LLC i I % ROCKPOINT GROUP LLC 3953 MAPLE AVE # 300 i 3953 MAPLE AVE # 300 CALLAS, TX 75210 --- 0 I �I CALLAS, TX 75210 --- 0 RP ORANGE BLOSSOM OWNER LLC I 11. RP ORANGE BLOSSOM OWNER LLC I' % ROCKPOINT GROUP LLC % ROCKPOINT GROUP LLC 3953 MAPLE AVE # 300 3953 MAPLE AVE # 300 CALLAS, TX 75210 --- 0 i CALLAS, TX 75210 --- 0 639E, ROONEY, SHAUN 4065 MERRIWEATHER WOODS r ALPHARETTA, GA 30022 --- 0 E ROSADO, BRANDYN NICOLE 3522 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ROSS, MARK L & GRETCHEN J 3636 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7812 ROTTIERS, RAFAEL & FELICITAS V 3268 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 RP ORANGE BLOSSOM OWNER LLC % ROCKPOINT GROUP LLC 3953 MAPLE AVE # 300 CALLAS, TX 75210---0 RP ORANGE BLOSSOM OWNER LLC % ROCKPOINT GROUP LLC 3953 MAPLE AVE # 300 CALLAS, TX 75210 --- 0 RP ORANGE BLOSSOM OWNER LLC % ROCKPOINT GROUP LLC 3953 MAPLE AVE # 300 CALLAS, TX 75210 --- 0 RP ORANGE BLOSSOM OWNER LLC % ROCKPOINT GROUP LI,C 3953 MAPLE AVE # 300 CALLAS, TX 75210 --- 0 RP ORANGE BLOSSOM OWNER LLC ROCKPOINT GROUP LLC 3953 MAPLE AVE # 300 CALLAS, TX 75210---0 it l l label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 0'5160/81'60 65=. Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 0'6160/8160 RP ORANGE BLOSSOM OWNER LLC % ROCKPOINT GROUP LLC 3953 MAPLE AVE # 300 CALLAS, TX 75210---0 N 0 .N o N N 0 o o o N O N J ' 0 L 4: ea ; V a V m x w C! d E t v a' Packet Pg. TO5071 RP ORANGE BLOSSOM OWNER LL % ROCKPOINT GROUP LLC 3953 MAPLE AVE # 300 CALLAS, TX 75210 --- 0 RP ORANGE BLOSSOM OWNER LL % ROCKPOINT GROUP LLC 3953 MAPLE AVE # 300 DALLAS, TX 75219 --- 0 RP ORANGE BLOSSOM OWNER LL % ROCKPOINT GROUP LLC 3953 MAPLE AVE # 300 DALLAS, TX 75219 --- 0 RP ORANGE BLOSSOM OWNER LL % ROCKPOINT GROUP LLC 3953 MAPLE AVE # 300 DALLAS, TX 75219 --- 0 RUBINO, JOSEPH & LINETTE 2076 FAIRMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4573 RUIZ, ERIC A CAMPOS 3225 37TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 S S RAKEL FITZGERALD TRUST 131 HAWKS RIDGE CIR LOVELAND, OH 45140 --- 0 SABINA, GILBERTO LUZ M CALERO 14256 SW 23RD ST MIAMI, FL 33175--- 8023 SAINT, HARVINDERSINGH H 3230 33RD AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 09G9/09tSo AA9AV 39AR alglfedwoo LLIW L9 x ulul 9Z tewi0f ap affarjb33 09,l,q/09190 AjaAV gIIm aiglfeduioo „$/9 Z x „f azls lagel C RP ORANGE BLOSSOM OWNER LLC % ROCKPOINT GROUP LLC i 3953 MAPLE AVE # 300 DA;;AS, TX 75219 --- 0 W .4.c 4 RP ORANGE BLOSSOM OWNER LLC % ROCKPOINT GROUP LLC r 3953 MAPLE AVE # 300 DALLAS, TX 75219 --- 0 C RP ORANGE BLOSSOM OWNER LLC' RP ORANGE BLOSSOM OWNER LLC i ! i % ROCKPOINT GROUP LLC i i % ROCKPOINT GROUP LLC i 3953 MAPLE AVE # 300 I 3953 MAPLE AVE # 300 DALLAS, TX 75219 --- 0 DALLAS, TX 75219 --- 0 ! I! i C RP ORANGE BLOSSOM OWNER LLC RP ORANGE BLOSSOM OWNER LLC % ROCKPOINT GROUP LLC I % ROCKPOINT GROUP LLC 3953 MAPLE AVE # 300 3953 MAPLE AVE # 300 DALLAS, TX 75219 --- 0 i DALLAS, TX 75219---0 C RUA, JEFFREY ABEL i RUBEN, ANDREW.& NANCYJ ROSEMARIE SUDANO i 245 OLD TOWN VILLAGES CTR CIR I I 2907 41ST AVENUE NE i I #7112 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i STAUGUSTINE, FL 32084 --- 0 i I! RUFOLO,JOSEPH M SUSAN E RUFOLO 2101 SATSUMA LANE ; I NAPLES, FL. 34120 --- 0 ! ! I RUTTER,ROGERJASON 1 MICHELLE RENEE RUTTER I 2165 CLEMENTINE ST NAPLES, FL 34120---0 I! i �l SAA, MARITZA ! ' LUIS J MALATESTA 80-45 KEW GARDEN RD #404 l ! ` KEW GARDEN NY 11415 --- 0 ! RUIZ, ANGEL RODRIGUEZ SONIAJIMINEZ RIVERA 2085 HAMLIN ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 RUZ, DULCE M _ . .- _. 2380 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---2920 S.AAVEDRA, JAVIER . ELSA ABARCA 18860 NW 78TH PL HIALEAH, FL 33015--- 5272 SADLER, DUSTIN & SAMANTHA SAFFOLD, JAMES A & SHARMAN L i 3370 27TH AVE NE ! 2171 VERMONT LANE NAPLES, FL 34120---3246 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ! I . ( SAINTHEARD, SMITH i ( SAINVIL, CEROSKY F ISADORA DEJERVIL i ! MEGAN N SAINVIL 3680 37TH AVENUE NE i ' 2142 CLEMENTINE ST NAPLES, FL 34120---2807 I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I! SAITH, VIJAY J & TASLEEMA R ! SALDARRIAGA, DIANY SAMMUT, ANTONiO 2133 FAIRMONT LN ! 3445 RANDALL BLVD GAIL ANTOINETTE SAMMUT NAPLES, FL 34120-7-4576 . NAPLES, FL 34120---0 i ' 55953 SEQUOIA CT SHELPYTOWNSHIP, MI 48316---0 ! i label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/8160 Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery O'S160/8160 0—"i Packet Pg. 1051 i I! RUFOLO,JOSEPH M SUSAN E RUFOLO 2101 SATSUMA LANE ; I NAPLES, FL. 34120 --- 0 ! ! I RUTTER,ROGERJASON 1 MICHELLE RENEE RUTTER I 2165 CLEMENTINE ST NAPLES, FL 34120---0 I! i �l SAA, MARITZA ! ' LUIS J MALATESTA 80-45 KEW GARDEN RD #404 l ! ` KEW GARDEN NY 11415 --- 0 ! RUIZ, ANGEL RODRIGUEZ SONIAJIMINEZ RIVERA 2085 HAMLIN ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 RUZ, DULCE M _ . .- _. 2380 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---2920 S.AAVEDRA, JAVIER . ELSA ABARCA 18860 NW 78TH PL HIALEAH, FL 33015--- 5272 SADLER, DUSTIN & SAMANTHA SAFFOLD, JAMES A & SHARMAN L i 3370 27TH AVE NE ! 2171 VERMONT LANE NAPLES, FL 34120---3246 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ! I . ( SAINTHEARD, SMITH i ( SAINVIL, CEROSKY F ISADORA DEJERVIL i ! MEGAN N SAINVIL 3680 37TH AVENUE NE i ' 2142 CLEMENTINE ST NAPLES, FL 34120---2807 I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I! SAITH, VIJAY J & TASLEEMA R ! SALDARRIAGA, DIANY SAMMUT, ANTONiO 2133 FAIRMONT LN ! 3445 RANDALL BLVD GAIL ANTOINETTE SAMMUT NAPLES, FL 34120-7-4576 . NAPLES, FL 34120---0 i ' 55953 SEQUOIA CT SHELPYTOWNSHIP, MI 48316---0 ! i label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/8160 Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery O'S160/8160 0—"i Packet Pg. 1051 RUIZ, ANGEL RODRIGUEZ SONIAJIMINEZ RIVERA 2085 HAMLIN ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 RUZ, DULCE M _ . .- _. 2380 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---2920 S.AAVEDRA, JAVIER . ELSA ABARCA 18860 NW 78TH PL HIALEAH, FL 33015--- 5272 SADLER, DUSTIN & SAMANTHA SAFFOLD, JAMES A & SHARMAN L i 3370 27TH AVE NE ! 2171 VERMONT LANE NAPLES, FL 34120---3246 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ! I . ( SAINTHEARD, SMITH i ( SAINVIL, CEROSKY F ISADORA DEJERVIL i ! MEGAN N SAINVIL 3680 37TH AVENUE NE i ' 2142 CLEMENTINE ST NAPLES, FL 34120---2807 I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I! SAITH, VIJAY J & TASLEEMA R ! SALDARRIAGA, DIANY SAMMUT, ANTONiO 2133 FAIRMONT LN ! 3445 RANDALL BLVD GAIL ANTOINETTE SAMMUT NAPLES, FL 34120-7-4576 . NAPLES, FL 34120---0 i ' 55953 SEQUOIA CT SHELPYTOWNSHIP, MI 48316---0 ! i label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/8160 Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery O'S160/8160 0—"i Packet Pg. 1051 SAN LAZARD INVESTMENTS LLC 8506 E 23RD ST ALVA, FL 33920--- 1312 SANCHEZ ENTERPRISE INVEST LLC 3244 70TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 SANCHEZ, JESUS 2442 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 SANCHEZ, MERCEDES 2885 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7432 SANCHEZ-PENALVER, ALFONSO 2015 PARSON STREET NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 SANJAY DEO REV TRUST MANISH NAGPAL ASHISH DHAM 4836 CHARDONNAY DR CORAL SPRINGS, FL 33067 --- 0 SANTOEMMA JR,10HN JOSEPH ELSA NOEMY CALDERON 2055 SAGEBRUSH CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4569 SARNA,JULIUS G &ADELINE M %G WHITE 3452 MONO DR RIVERSIDE, CA 92506--- 2117 SCARLE, ANGELA BETH JEREMY LANCE SCARLE 2147 VERMONT LANE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 SCHMIDT, LADONNA K KEVIN J SCHMIDT 4522 PORTOBELLO CIR VALRICO, FL 33596--- 8500 0918/091C,© AJaAV oaAe aigi;erJwoo ww L9 x ww gZ lewlof ap allanbll3 0918/09 [go) AJaAV qm algltedwoo „g/g Z x „1 azis lapel SAN LAZARD INVESTMENTS LLC 3506 E 23RD ST ALVA, FL 33920--- 1312fit SANCHEZ, FRANCISCO ACOSTA MARLON J ACOSTA 2786 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 -0 SANCHEZ, JESUS 2442 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7540 SANCHEZ, SILVIA 3730 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 SANDERS, JAMES & DAWN 2101 CLEMENTINE STREET NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i I� i SANTIAGO, JOSIE PASAG HECTOR A SANTIAGO 2067 SAGEBRUSH CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ;I SANTOS, CHRISTOPHER A 2670 OIL WELL RD NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4529 I 1 i t SAUL, JOHN F & ANNETTE i I 2281 VERMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 !I SCHEMBER, RACQUELANN DUSTYN ALLEN SCHEMBER 3200 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 is l� SCHMITT EST, RAYMOND EDWARD LAUREN A SCHMITT 2214 HEYDON CIR W NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 1' label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160 Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avers OBOE, SANABRIA, JACQUELINE,LORRAINE GILBERTSANABRIA r 2065 HAMLIN ST E 3 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i I I I I IIII 11 ,I I II '81:60 05160/8160 SANCHEZ, JADE & ERIC 24TH AVENUE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 SANCHEZ, JOSE U BARBARA 0 GONZALEZ 15165 SW 20TH LN MIAMI, FL 33185--- 5682 SANCHEZ, SILVIA & RICARDO 3730 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 SANDSTEDT, MELISSA 2967 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 SANTILLI, MARLENE J 224 OWL CT FREMONT, CA 94539--- 6200 SARDINAS, PABLO M ESTRELLA SARDINAS 3495 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1547 SAVALIA, PRASHANT MANHAR 801 LINCOLN GLEN DR BUENA PARK, CA 90620 --- 0 SCHILLER, PAUL & ASHLEY RAE 2364 ORCHARD ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 SCHMITT, LAREEN ANN ANDREW MICHAEL SCH MITT 2931 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 N c N 0 N N 0 0 0 0 N 0 N J a a m s x W Packet Pg. 1052 0918/091�@ AAAV Dane algltedwoo ww Lg x ww gZ fewaof op 9119ribl13 9.A.4.c 0919/0919© NaAV Ul!M algltedwoo „8l9 Z x j azls lagel SCHULTZ, TAMARA & JASON JOHN SCHULZ, JASON R SCHWAB, CHARLES M & DOROTHY M 2294 VERMONT LANE 257124TH AVE NE 12859 AXLINE RD r NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3555 LOVETTSVILLE, DC 20180--- 2708 II! E E I!I I I 0 SCHWALM, MARION K & JEFFREY SCHWARTZ, JOHN N & SUZANNE 1 SCOTT, I W & MARGARET v 3775 EVERGLADES BLVD N 4951 RUSTIC OAKS CIR i PO BOX 172 L NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3242 1 NAPLES, FL 34105--- 4522 FERGUSON, KY 42533 --- 172 U I L I d SCOTT, JOHN EDMUND } SEGURA, GERMAN D i SELVA, CELESTE V J KATHLEEN BENZ SCOTT I i j PO BOX 451251 , ; HENRY B SELVA 1R 2525 RANDALL BLVD II, SUNRISE, F--- 0 L 33345 E PO BOX 830669 NAPLES, FL 34120---5577 i MIAMI, FL 33283 --- 0 C E W SEMANCIK, KELLY SERGILE, EZECHIEL& NICOLE I SERPA, JEANNE & LAUREOLO A Q 2399 HEYDON CIRCLE E 2010 FAIRMONT LN `; 2460 EVERGLADES BLVD N d NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 Ii o N " N i �t ( SERRANO, KRISTIE 1 i :' SERRANO, OMAR & MELISSA i SETA RICHARD A o 34 LE MANS DR ( 3440 RANDALL BLVD i ANTHONY CRISCI N NAPLES, FL 34112--- 9126 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I ! I 3 KING ARTHUR CT J l EAST SETAUKET, NY 11733 --- 0 a jIl I o Ln SEVERYN, MIGUEL & MELISSA �1 SEVILLA, EMERSON RAFAEL R SEWELL, LANG L 00 v 2149 FAIRMONT LN j 1878 ALAMEDA DR ; ANTONIO L BOLLING _ NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7812 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 2559 41ST AVE NE N i I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 C 2 SHAFFER, NATHAN M f SHANKS, DENNIS J & MARY 1 ly SHAVERJEREMY SCOTT P MAYNETTO 42WO30 HUGHES RD JULIALEE SHAVER 0 2080 HAMLIN ST I ELBURN, IL 60119 --0 3840 EVERGLADES BLVD N N N i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- D I I I NAPLES, FL 34120- -0 00 III N I04 SHAW, CHARLES BORDEN & LISA JO i SHAW, RACQUEL ALECIA i I` SHEIKH, MAHAMMED S J a 2386 ORCHARD ST i OMARIO HUBERT SHAW I SHAMIM SHEIKH rn NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 2923 27TH AVE NE ', I 500 NW 136TH AVE I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i MIAMI, FL 33182--- 1915 d � I SHEPARD, MOLLY LYNNE ! SHEPPARD, SCOTT & BRENDA SHIRLEY, THERESE IL V RYAN M SHEPARD 2063 VERMONT LN 5464 AGOSTINE WAY V 2565 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 AVE MARIA, FL 34142 --- 0 m NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 �I 1 `• f SIEGMUND JR, C W ( SIEPIERSKI, JOELARTHUR 1 SIFRE, CHARLES A W PO BOX AH RENEE LYNN SIEPIERSKI I GIOVANNA QUINTANA SPARKS, NV 89432--- 8633 i 2211 DANCY ST 3435 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120---3536 t � I v � I i,l Q HIM label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/8160 Etiquette de format 25 67 avec Avery 05160/8160 mm x mm compatible Packet Pg. 1053 7] 09t9/09t5® AJanV oane algijedwoo ww L9 x ww qZ ILwJoJ ap aJtanbit3 09!t8/09 t5©,4JaAV gtinn algitedwoo „9/9 Z x „G azis lagel SILKE, JASON & LIZBETH A j SILVAJR, RICHARD 2230 VERMONT LN f 812 SW 47TH TER APT 207 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 " CAPE CORAL, FL 33914--- 7385 i SILVERIO, ALEXEY GARCIA ' i SIMKO, CHRISTOPHER ELAINE A MARTINEZ RODRIGUEZ WARREN SIMKO 2730 39TH AVE NE 2215 VERMONT LN i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I ! i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I SINCIC, STEVEN J & DENISE L SMALLHORN, SHARON M ' 4465 RANCH RD ERNEST L SMALLHORN WILLIAMSBURG, MI 49690--- 9623 i 1986 FAIRMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 it SMITH, JOHN R SMITH, KEVIN J KRISTEL RABORN ! 3970 EVERGLADES BLVD N I i 2775 OIL WELL RD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4454 i ! SMITH, STEVEN MARK i SMITH, TINA JOY PATRICIA ANN SMITH I CHAD ERIC BROWN i ! 2046 MINNEOLA ST i 3245 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 SNYDER, BRANDY LYNN i I` SOCCI, SUSAN ADAM JOSEPH GRISANTI 2125 CLEMENTINE STREET 2084 FAIRMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i SOGNARE LLC SOLA, ELSA I 3606 ENTERPRISE AVE ! MADIAN I LOPEZ l NAPLES, FL 34109 --- 0 ! GRACIELA M GOMEZ 6641 SW 5TH ST i PEMBR0KE PINES, FL 33023--- 1227 129A.E] SILVA, JENFRIT NORANDO CAROLINE JANE SILVA r 2099 SAGEBRUSH CIR E NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 SIMONSEN, SANDRA L THOMAS L LYONS 1 LANARK RD APT 3 BROOKLINE, MA 02445--- 1832 SMITH, CORY M & JAYLA 2061 MANDARIN LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 SMITH, LINDSEY 2184 VERMONT LANE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 SMITH-WILLIAMS, KAREEN SIMONE MICHAEL CLAYTON 2146 CLEMENTINE ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 SOLARES, MARCO I )ULE HUIVItS LLC 2485 NE 135TH TER 8004 NW 154TH AVE STE 669 NORTH MIAMI BEAC; FL 33181--- 3520 i MIAMI LAKES, FL 33016 --- 0 �i SOSA, PEDRO A & ISABEL M SOSA, ROSA JOSE 940 W 43RD ST OLIVIA VASQUEZ HIALEAH, FL 33012--- 7252 i 2679 27TH AVE NE ! NAPLES, FL 34120---0 1 SOTO JR, RUPERTO SOTOLONGO, DANI l ADELAIDA SOTO I 3610 35TH AVE NE i 2830 35TH AVE NE I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 489 it Etiquette label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/81'60 de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 0' 5160/8160 SOGNALE LLC 3606 ENTERPRISE AVE STE 386 NAPLES, FL 34104 --- 0 SOLA, FRANK J & CARMELA 2179 VERMONT LANE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 SOLER, JONATHAN KEYLA CASTRO 3280 33RD AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 SOTO JR, ROBERTO & ADELAIDA 2830 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 SOTOLONGO, JAVIER 2765 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120---0 Packet Pg. 1054 09L8/09 i.50 AJ8AV oaAe alglLedwoo ww Zg x ww gZ tewJot ap 9118nbil3 09 t9/09 L90 I(JaAV gtlrA alglaedwoo „8/9 Z x , L azis lagel SOTOMAYOR, JORGE A i SOUTH FL WATER MGMT DIST i CHRISTINE SOTOMAYOR 3301 GUN CLUB RD 2980 RANDALL BLVD i ; ( WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33406---0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 j SPARKS, CHARIE i SPIES, CHRISTOFFELJ 4995 TALLOWOOD WAY I i KIMBERLY A SPIES NAPLES, FL 34105 --- 0 2136 FAIRMONT LN i NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4575 I:` SRS05 LLC ; ; i STJEAN, KERLANDE• 175 GREAT NECK RD STE 407 CARL MULTIDOR GREAT NECK, NY 11021 --- 0 1924 WELLINGTON ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 STAMADIANOS, PANAYIOTA STANKIEWICZ, JEREMY RAYMOND STAMADIANOS, GEORGE=& DINA :• ( 2062 MANDARIN LN 1735 ORCHARD ST NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4554 ANN ARBOR, MI 48103--- 4118 i� STECKMAN, NICKOLAS ERIC ICI STEK, SCOTT C & JENNIFER R ERICA BACHER STECKMAN 2109 FAIRMONT LN 2925 37TH AVE NE `i` i NAPLES, FL 34120---4576 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 it STEWART, NALINE i STIEHLJR, JERRY FRANK KIMNA KY i j TARA LYNNE STIEHL 29 ROWE STREET 1999 PARSON ST NEWTON, MA 82466 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 STOECKLEIN, DONALD P & ROSEANN 2314 HEYDON CI W NAPLES, FL 34120---0 S10VALL,STEVEN M CYNTHIA HERRERA STOVALL 2385 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 SUAREZ SR, ARMANDO & LICY S 3260 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 SUBAUS FE, CARLOS A ADA E SABERBEIN 2485 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120-••-3573 STONESON, RICHARD A & CAROL 2186 CLEMENTINE ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 65 WE, SOUTH FL WATER MGMT DIST ATTN: LAND MGMT r 3301 GUN CLUB RD WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33406 --- 0 SPRING, SUZANNE 741 HILBISH AVE AKRON, OH 44312--- 3087 STALLONE, PAUL & GRAZIA L 2390 HEYDON CIR E NAPLES, FL 34120---4578 STANLEY, SUZANNE S & BRYAN D 3415 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---1885 STEVENSON, DAVID J & PAULA A 3590 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1556 STODOLA, FRANK W &JANETJ 2081 FAIRMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 STORWICK, TONY PETER LIBNY STORWICK 3517 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 Sl ROETER, ASHLEY NICOLE STROM, WILI_IAM A & ANDREA K ' ( CLARK P STROETER i 2006 FAIRMONT LN 3525 35TH AVE NE I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1563 ( SUAREZ, NELSON 1 i 2895 27TH AVE NE iNAPLES, FL 34120--- 7415 iff ' I!I I _ SUFFIAN, HOLLY i 2132 PARSON STREET NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/8160 Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 0`5160/8160 SUAREZ, SILVESTRE 488 WINCHESTER AVE UNION, NJ 07083--- 7912 SULLIVAN, CORNELIUS 2440 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 442 Packet Pg. 1055 SUMMERS 11, ROBERT DEWSON TINA MICHELLE SUMMERS 2049 HAMLIN STREET NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 SUNSHINE HOME BILDRS SVCS LLC 1904 COUNTESS CT NAPLES, FL 34116 --- 0 SURANYI,FERENC 2744 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 SYLVESTRE, NATACHA 4135 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 9412D --- 494 TADROS, MAHFOUZ & RENEE F 197.HOOVER DR CRESSKILL, NJ 07626 --- 0 TADROS,RENEE 197 HOOVER DR CRESSKILL, NJ 07626---0 TADROS, RENEE F 197 HOOVER DR CRESSKILL, NJ 07626 --- 0 TADROS, RENEE F 197 HOOVER DRIVE CRESSKILL, N1 07626 --- 0 TALAVERA, JOSE L RAMIRO DIAZ 2707 NW 7TH TER CAPE CORAL, FL 33993--- 7016 TANQUILUT, MARLENE 1 34446 N EASTINGS WAY GURNEE, IL 60031--- 4286 0918/09 f.90 AJaAV Dane alg!ledwoo WW L9 x WW ,cZ 1PWJ0l ap 01l0nb113 091G8/09l,90 AJaAV rplm algl}edu oo „8/9 Z x,, l azls lapel SUNNY HOME SOLUTION LLC TR i SUNNY HOME SOLUTION LLC UTD 1/1/04 407 PINEWOOD DR OLDSMAR, FL 34677--- 5508 SUNSHINE HOME CLNG & CARE LLC i 2210 MALIBU LAKE WAY APT 822 I NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 I SWFL PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC i PO BOX 1126 i MARCO ISLAND, FL 34146 --- 0 SZYC, KAZIMIERZ & TERESA II 1 i` 11319 MORAINE DR APT G PALOS HILLS, IL 60465---0 TADROS, RENEE 197 HOOVER DR r CRESSKILL, NJ 07626 --- 0 i� lis i I! TADROS, RENEE F I: 197 HOOVER DR i CRESSHILL, NJ 07626 --- 0 i • I ii Ili <• TADROS RENEE F ! f 197 HOOVER DRIVE i �I CREESKILL, NJ 07626 --- 0 �I TAGLIA, JOSEPH P & LISA M , ! 3673 LOCUST AVE SEAFORD,NY 11783—-0 lip I;I i : f FALBOTT 11, TIMOTHY MILLER 2626 OIL WELL RD ' NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 TASSY, ROBENS i ( 3565 31ST AVE. N W . NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 1 SUNSHINE FL DEVELOPMENT INC 1030 PORT ORANGE WAY NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 SUNSHINE WAY INVESTMENTS LLC GUY GOLAN 19111 COLLINS AVE APT 801 SUNNY ISLES BEAC, FL 33160--- 2379 SWIATKOWSKI, DOUGLAS SAMIRA G SWIATKOWSKI 5059 FORESTDALE DR WEST BLOOMFIELD, MI 48322 --- 0 TADROS, MAHFOUZ & RENEE F 197 HOOVER DR CRESSKILL, NJ 07626 --- 0 TADROS, RENEE Z97 HOOVER DR CRESSKILL, NJ 07626-•--0 TADROS, RENEE F 197 HOOVER DR CRESSHILL, NJ 07626 --- 0 TADROS, RENEE F 197 HOOVER DRIVE CRESSKILL, NJ 07626 --- 0 TAGUE, CHESTER R 2274 VERMONT LANE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 TALLEYGRAND, ROMANE NADINE BTALLEYRAND 3320 33RD AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 TAYLORJR, DONALD VINCENT MARINA FROLOVA 2007 PARSON STREET NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/81,60 A Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 05160/8160 Packet Pg. 1056 09t8/0q], @ (JaAV MAP algltedwoo ww L9 x ww gZ tewjof ap altanb113 09[q/09tg©f1aAV ga m olgpedwoo „9/9 Z x „t ozis lagel TAYLOR JR, MILLARD i TAYLOR SR, RODNEY L 1981 SAGEBRUSH CIRCLE I LISA MARIE TAYLOR NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ! 3630 35TH AVE NE , i NAPLES, FL 34120---0 TEGROTENHUIS, JUSTIN I '.j TEJADA, LUISA DENIS MERINO i CHRISTINA MICHELLE SHUTTER 2646 29TH AVE NE 2149 CLEMENTINE ST j i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i ;I I li TELISCHAK, PATRICIA ANNE (ii l l TELLECHEA-MENDOZA, JOAN l JOHN TELISCHAK ! OLGA TELLECHEA 2167 VERMONT LANE I 3180 41ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 TEREKHOV, SERGEY ( TERRERO, RAIZA 3580 2ND AVE NE I i I 3682 YOSEMITE CT NAPLES; FL 34117 --- 0 i j NAPLES, FL 34116--- 7301 THAIVALAPPIL, SASEENDRAN Il ; ( THOMAS LEE KITTS LIVING TRUST i KALATHAIVALAPPIL j i I 219 DOLPHIN COVE CT 7210 GREENSPRING LANE j BONITASPRINGS, FL 34134--- 7456 LANHAM, MD 20706--- 1343 I .I !i I II I\ THOMAS, JANICE ; i THOMAS, LISA JIMMY M THOMAS I I JACOB THOMAS 7130 BREWSTER LN i i I 214 ROLLINGHILLS DR MISSOURI CITY, TX 77459---0 WEXFORD, PA 15090---0 1 II II I THOMPSON, DOROTHY KISHIA l f THOMPSON, LISA ANN & PAUL W I� 2920 RANDALL BLVD I i 2595 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--5502 II I! I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I I I THOMPSON, MARIA V I I I � li THOMPSON, MARIA V CONSTANTINOS A LEVANOS CONSTANTINOS A LEVANOS ; I 23941 ADDISON PLACE CT 23941 ADDISON PLACE CT BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 --- 0 j II 1 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134---0 II I M!"A.4.D TAYLOR, JEREMY S & MICHELLE L 239135TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7508 TEJADA, PAOLA ANDREA 3840 EVER GLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 TENDERO,JENNIFER MAYQUEL SALGADO 2735 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120--0 TESSIN, RANDY RAY HEATHER NICOLE TESSIN 2217 HEYDON CIR W NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4585 THOMAS, CELENA LANETTE 2420 37TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 THOMPSON, DANIAL R BRIGITTE RTHOMPSON 1993 SAGEBRUSH CIR NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 THOMPSON, LORENE & RAYMOND L 2029 MANDARIN LANE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 THOMPSON, MARK J & BARBARA D 2086 PARSON ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 THOMPSON, MICHELLE i THOMPSON, TYLER STEVEN MICHAELJOSEPH PANTO j I JESSICA ANN THOMPSON 2203 VERMONT LN 2356 ORCHARD ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i THREE BROTHERS PROPERTY LLC Ili �I ; TINIZHANAY, LUIS A 215 SW 125TH AVE ( MARGARET MONENTE ! ; 122 PLANTATION, FL 33325 --- 0 KING EIDER WAY TAYLORS, SC 29687 --- 0 �I it 'I - - I label size 1" x 2 5/B" compatible with Avery 05160/8160 Etiquette de format 25 min x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 19 5160/8160 THOMSON, ANDREA 102 WOODRUFF COURT CARY, NC 27518 --- 0 IiRADO, RUDY E & MARIA E 2306 HEYDON CIR W NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4586 Packet Pg. 1057 TOBERMAN, DUSTIN D MICHELLE LTOBERMAN 2398 ORCHARD ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 TOLEDO SR, VIRVES & JUANA L 3395 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1516 TOM, HANG C DONNA YEE 219 17TH ST APT #1B BROOKLYN, NY 11215 --- 0 TOM, HANG CHI DONNA YEE 219 17TH ST APT 1 B BROOKLYN, NY 11215 --- 0 TORRES, JORGE T 3961 SW 145 AVE MIRAMAR, FL 33027---0 TRAN, CHAU N & OANH T 909 S WESTHILL CT BLOOMINGTON, IN 47403--- 2119 TREVINO, RICKY 2730 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34210 --- 0 TRIMBLE, DONALD G 2830 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3484 TROMBLEYJENNIFER 1436 KIWI COURT PUNTA GORDA, FL 33950---0 TRUONG, HIEU VAN NGUYEN THI THU TRUONG 2104 PARSON ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 US =Iu- 09 48/09 G5o AJ9AV 39AP a1g11etlwoo ww L9 x tool 9Z IewJ01 ap allanbB3 0918/09 i 90 AJaAV LIIIM algltetlwoo „ q/9 Z x „1 azls lapel TODD TROY & SHEILENE 216FAIRMONT LN NAPLES, FL 28036 --- 0 � •i i TOLEDO, ROBERTO & MADELIN II I 131 E 36TH ST HIALEAH, FL '33013--- 2635 I 9.A.4.c Ed—! t- - TOLEDO FERNANDEZ, JUAN CARLOS DEBBY MAYOR r 2360 37TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL • 34120---7542 3 TOM, HANG C DONNA YEE i ! 219 17TH ST it APT 1B BROOKLYN, NY 11215 --- 0 I TORRES, DIEGO F 2689 41ST AVE NE I , NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 II i TOSKA, XHENSILA i JACOB THOMAS CABRERA 1854 ALAMEDA DR NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 TREFNEY,JOSEPH JILLIAN SCOTT 2770 CYPRESS TRACE CIR j #2422 NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 TRIANA FAMILY REV/LIV TRUST I 4150 SW 112TH AVE MIAMI, FL 33165--- 4774 i i i TRIPI, LEWIS y (} N9189 WEST RD i `,NATERTOWN, WI 53094--- 9172 ! n l i f TROUT, DARCI MARIE l JASON RIAN TROUT 401 WEST 3RD ST ELMHURST, IL 60126---0 � ; I TSCHUPP, EDWARD W I i CAROLYN LESLIE PHELPS TSCHUPP 2485 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery c'�15160/8160 Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 65160/8160 TOLEDO, VIRVES & JUANA 3395 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1516 TOM, HANG C DONNAYEE 219 17TH STREET APT 1B BROOKLYN, NY 11215 --- 0 TORRES, FRANCISCO LIDIA ESCOBAR 26877 LOST WOODS CIR BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34138 --- 0 TRADEWIND INVESTMENTS LLC 1655 MULLET CT NAPLES, FL 34102 --- 0 TRENT, JAMES R 317141ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3276 TRIANA, JOSE & ADA 4150 SW 112TH AVE MIAMI, FL 33165 --- 0 TROFATTER JR, FREEDERICK P HEATHER B TROFATTER 19 QUALEY RD GRAY, ME 04039--0 TRUONG,DANH HA THI MINH TRAN 2108 PARSON ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 TUREK, NIKOLAS A 2765 41ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 2801 Packet Pg. TO5871 10 0 091.8/09L5o AJaAV 09AB algltedwoo ww Lg x ww 9Z LewJof ap 911011bl,3 09LB/09I.5©AJaAV I ql!m alglfedwoo ,,8/4 Z x „L azls logel TURLEY, BRETT A & WENDY P i TURNER III, VINCENT E & IULIIA i 2278 HEYDON CIR W 2470 HEYDON CIR E NAPLES, FL 34120 4584 NAPLES, FL 34120 -0 TURNIPSEED, MARLIN E I ! TURNIPSEED, MARLIN E & KATHY 1 KATHY J LOCKE-TURNIPSEED I 3680 29TH AVE NE 3680 29TH AVE NE I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 9582 III i , I UGLE LLC l' UNDERWOOD, FRANK 2155 KHASIA PT 2418 HEYDON CIR E i NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 VADON ET AL, JO ANN I i I VAIRO, VANESSA J VINCENT L CALABRESE ( 3430 29TH AVE NE %JOHN LEAVENS i I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1586 i 2358 SHADE TREE LN CLEARWATER, FL 33759--- 1332 ll� I'I VALDES, ARACELIS ! VALDES, J0RGE VITON 2495 RANDALL BLVD ; I BETSY BORREGO BADA NAPLES, FL 341.20 --- 0 i 2665 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ! j VALDES, MAGDIEL CLAUDIO I'( I VALDES, ROBERTO ANA LEON GONZALEZ I ERLIANIS RIVES MEDEROS 1973 SAGEBRUSH CIRCLE ; I 3420 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 'I l ilh �l VALDEZ, EDGAR i I VALDIVIA, BRUNO & ASHLEY 5350 WARREN ST i 2102 CLEMENTINE STREET f NAPLES, FL 34113 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ! i VALERA, DANIELJOSE RIERA I � I '1 i � I VALLADARES, CHARLES & KRYSTAL' MARIA CAROLINA ROJAS-CEPEDA II i l 2256 DANCY ST 2072 HAMLIN ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120---0 VALYKEO EDWARD ALLEN �1 ; f 1l VAN GUILDER SR, GERALD BYRON ! ' 2920 35TH AVE NE i KATHLEEN MARGARET VAN GUILDER NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 2158 CLEMENTINE ST ' l ! i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 VAN WINKLE, MAURINE I i VANDERPLOEG, DUSTIN D i 6833 FERSTEL RD YESENIA PEREZ VANDERPLOEG NEWBURGH, IN 47630---1747 • I 2545 27TH AVE NE I" TURNIPSEED, MARLIN E KATHYJ LOCKE-TURNIPSEED 3680 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 TYBURSKI, JOHN GEORGETYBURSKI 2046 MANDARIN UN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 UNICASA DEVELOPMENT INC 12555 ORANGE DRIVE UNIT 220 DAVIE, FL 33330 --- 0 VALDES, ALAYN GONZALEZ ANALYN AMADOR 2583 39TFI AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 VALDES, JOSE FONTE 3680 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4491 VALDES,'YOAN 2545 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 VALEMINO,'CLAIRE JAMES L EGOLF 2011 LIV TRUST 11764 NEW BUFFALO RD NORTH LIMA, OH 44452--- 9733 VALLEJO, CARLOS 2875 35TH_AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 490 VAN HORN, SANDRA H & ROBERT M 3573.29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34 2 - i 0 label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery °5160/8160 -M10 Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 05160/8160 VANEK, MICHAEL A & JOY A 4514 S EMERALD AVE CHICAGO, IL 60609 --- 0 r c 3 E 0 U t t V C L d s 7 J E W Q: a 0 N N O O O 0 N o: N J a 0 L ao 1 N N c N O N N 0 0 O 0 N 0 N J (L N ea ': 4) JL UI V m I W C d t v a Packet Pg. 105971 0919/09190 (JaAV Dane algpedwoo ww L9 x ww c,Z tewJo} op attanbj13 09:19/09190 AJaAV gtjm algjtedwoo „q/5 7, x „1 azjs lapel VANITY INVEST PROPERTIES LLC VANNAVONG, POUIE & BOUALOM 79 SW 12TH STREET UNIT 1412 2665 RANDALL BLVD l i MIAMI, FL 33130 --- 0 i NAPLES, FL 34120--- 5566 j VARGAS, PATRICIA 2089 FAIRMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 VASHA, ARJAN & ESMERALDA 2003 PARSON ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 VAZQUEZ, JESSIC HECTOR MANUEL VAZQUEZ MARQUEZ 18493 SEBRING ,RD FORT MYERS, FL 33967 --- 0 j VEGA, PABLO C 2325 OIL WELL RD j NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7537 VELEZ JR, PEDRO & KENIA 1 2201 HEYDON CIR W NAPLES, FL 34120---4585 i VIEIRA, EDUARDO DE CASTRO SAMANTA VIEIRA 13302 BLOSSOM VALLEY DR CLERMONT, FL 34711 --- 0 I' VI ERA, TERESA 2845 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 490 VILLAFRANCA, ARNALDO BARBARA L VILLAFRANCA 6930 SW 178TH AVE SOUTHWEST RANCHE, FL 33331--- 1823 VILLERS; RANDY J VIRGINIA ANN VILLERS 2126 CLEMENTINE STREET NAPLES, FL '34120 --- 0 {+ VARGHESE,GEORGE CHECHAMMA GEORGE 703 SHERMAN AVE i THORNWOOD, NY 10594--- 1428 i lip iI VASSILOPOULOS, NICHOLAS C i EMILY C VASSILOPOULOS li! it I 2374 HEYDON CIR E NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 l iI j VAZQUEZ, JIOVANNI i 2995 RANDALL BLVD I NAPLES, FL 341207-0 1!I l VELASCO, ALBERTO & MARTHA 1 I ' 240 20TH AVE.NE i NAPLES, FL 34126 --- 0 i VELEZ, LUIS i 3680 37TH AVE NE ! NAPLES, FL 34120---0 ! j VIERA, LUIS ! I 19800 SW 180TH AVE LOT 373 I i i i MIAMI, FL 33187 --- 0 i j VIGNERI, THOIMAS J & DIANE L I 2458 HEYDON CIRCLE E i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 11 I ii 11 I i i VILLAFRANCA, AR14ALDO BARBARA VILLAFRANCA I 6930 SW 178TH AVE i !_ ' SOUTHWEST RANCHE, FL 33331---1823 ! �l , I !il VILORIA, JUAN J & SONNIA i 2990 RANDALL BLVD i NAPLES, FL 34120 --0 I label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/81:60 Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 05160/8160 w5u-A.4.D VARELA, DARIEL RAMOS 3240 31ST AVE NE r NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 E VARGO, BENJAMIN WILLIAM JAMIE MARIE ANDREWS 2870 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 VAZQUEZ, CHRISTIAN M AMANDA R VAZQUEZ 3533 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 VEGA, ANA ROSA 2380 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 VELAZQUEZ DEL TORO, KATIA ROBERTO PEREZ 2885 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 VENTURA, ANTHONY CHARL ES LINDSEY RENEE VENTURA 2069 FAIRMONT LN NAPLES, FL34120-•-0 VIERA, LUIS ALBERTO 142 SANTA CLARA DR #1 NAPLES, FL 34104 --- 0 VILAUT, MARTHA GARCIA 2888 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 VILLAR, DALIA N ROSA E VILLAR 610 W 15TH ST HIALEAH, FL 33010--- 2828 VINCENZO LAUCELLA & ROSETTA LAUCELLA REV LIVING TRUST 147-67 7TH AVE QUEENS, NY 11357 --- 0 N O W. O N N O O O ' O ; N O N J 0 �L ' 4) w 2 L% IL V V m s x w C d t a Packet Pg. 1060 VIRVES, CARLOS R CLAUDIA M 2470 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 VO, LONG T & OANH H 3042 TALKING ROCK DR FAIRFAX, VA 22031 --- 0 WALIGORA FAMILY TRUST 2082 SATSUMA LANE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 WALSH, BONNIE LJOLLY 2400 OIL WELL RD NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1471 WALTERS, RICHARD & SHELLY 2740 37TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7457 WARD, THOMAS TYSON DEANNA ROSEMARY WARD 2290 VERMONT LANE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 WATSON, DAVID WADE & JOYCE A 816 FOSTER RD GUTHRIE, OK 73044--- 6709 WEBB, STEPHEN D & SUSAN M 8182 LAKE SAN CARLOS CIR FORT MYERS, FL 33967--- 2811 WER SHING ET UX, R J 4710 POWERS FERRY RD ATLANTA, GA 30327--- 3429 f WGA HOMES INC 3210 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ogi-2/09I.6,@ fJaAV Dane aigpedwu WW L9 x IWJ 9? teLUJof op aatanbla] 0919/0919© AJaAV utlM alglfedwoo ,,9/9 Z x „t azls lapel VIVAS, ANDRES i (i 43843 KINGSTON STATION TER ASHBURN, VA 20148 --- 0 lil I' VOGEL NORMAN IRVING ii is I' ; ; I� ; �i �i ; ; i' 1` ; i i. i ; i� I ill I i l�l i ; I ; label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/8160 Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67-mm compatible avec Avery 06160/8160 LISA RUTH WEGWEISER VOGEL 2807 35TH AVE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 WALL, GARY & COLLEEN 1382 GREAT HILL RD GUILFORD, CT 06437 --- 0 WALSH, EDWARD C NOREEN A WALSH 2379 HEYDON CIR E NAPLES, FL 34120---0 WANG, SAI YU 560 25TH ST S W NAPLES, FL 34117 --- 0 WARREN, SHAWN L 3260 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 WATSON, ERIC L & SHELLY A 2031 SAGEBRUSH CIR NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4569 WEISKOPF-, JENNIFER IRWIN BRENTON KRISTOPHER WEISKOPF 2137 CLEMENTINE ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 WERTZ, THOR MICHAEL HEATHER LORRAINE WERTZ 1995 FAIRMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120---0 WHITAKER, KEVIN RAY AMANDA GAYLE WHITAKER 2295 VERMONT LANE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 wgA.E] VIVINO, GREGORY 2169 FAIRMONT LN r NAPLES, FL 34120---0 W E & M E WILSON TRUST MS. LYNN R WILSON 720 WALNUT ST CORUNNA, MI 48817--- 1086 WALSH JR, EDWARD C 2383 HEYDON CIR E NAPLES; FL 34120 --- 0 WALSH, JONATHAN DANIEL JANAI LOUISE MCCARTY WALSH 2375 HEYDON CIR E NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 WARD, DENISE M CLIFFORD HOROZINSKI 14626 N 35TH AVE PHOENIX, AZ 85053--- 4601 WASILEWSKI, DAVIDJ DEBORAH A WASILEWSKI 242129TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7553 WEAVER, DENISE 2697 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---7533 WENDT, MATTHEW & MINDY L 3445 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 3412.0 --- 0 WESTHAVEN INVESTMENT CORP 6585 WEST 8 LANE HIALEAH, FL 33012 --- 0 WHITE, CHAD & SARAH 3380 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 Packet Pg. 1061 WHITE, SILVIA 9 DIAS CREEK RD CAPE MAY COURTHO, N1 08108 --- 0 WICKERHAM 111, HOWARD L ANTOINETTE WICKERHAM 2127 VERMONT LANE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 WILCZYNSKI, DAVIDT SUNG HUI CHONG 2255 VERMONT LANE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 WILLIAM E BROWN REV TRUST 2940 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7459 WILLIAMS, DOUGLAS EUGENE MONICAJEAN WILLIAMS 2035 PARSON STREET NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 09 b8/09 [5Q AAAV aane olq!ludwoo ww L9 x ww 5Z 11;wJol ap allanbjl3 09:t9/09190 AJaAV U1lm alq!ledwoo „9/9 Z x „t azis jagel WHITELOCKE, DWAYNE i EVELYN ANDREA BURGESS MCGHEE 2259 VERMONT LANE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I:I 1 WIELAND, MONA 187 MOUNTAIN AVE N CALDWELL, NJ 07006--- 4005 I• I' I l' I f'I WILFONG, RUSSELL A& DENISE M 1 1 1 i 1951 FAIRMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I �'I WILLIAMS JR, MICHAELC 3775 GUESS ROAD UNIT 30 ! j DURHAM, NC 27705 --- 0 I, } i i WILLIAMS, MELISSA 2920 37TH AVE NE ' NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1579 I; i! II i� WILLIAMSON, JOHN i WILLIS, IUSTIN & KALLEY JULIA BIANNE NAUMAN WILLIAMSON 2680 EVERGLADES BLVD N I 2239 VERMONT LN i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i I i I WILSON, EDWARD MERIDITH KOVACH 2198 DANCY ST NAPLES, FL ,341207-0 WITTMAN, WILHELM & INGRID 15272 BRIARCREST CIRCLE FORT MYERS, FL 33912 --- 0 WOOD, CARLALLEN & PAMELAJEAN 2011 PARSON ST NAPLES, FL 34120---0 WILSON, REBECCA A 1711 W NELSON ST CHICAGO, IL 60657 --- 0 WLAZNIK, RYSZARD & DEBRA 20500 GRANLAGO DR VENICE, FL 34293 --- 0 WOODRUFF, KIRK R JENNIFER ANN GAFFOLI WOODRUFF 2271 HEYDON CIR W NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4585 WICK, JOHN 2060 HAMLIN ST NAPLES, FL 34120 -0 WIGGINS, CHRISTOPHER KRISTEN A WIGGINS 3670 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1878 WILLARD, JOSHUA S & ASHLEY E 2173 FAIRMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 WILLIAMS, ANDREW 2360 41ST AVE NE NAPLES, I'L 34120--- 2813 WILLIAMS, YVONNE P 5546 113TH ST SEMINOLE, FL 33772---7153 WILSON TR, GEORGE G RITA M WILSON TR KIM M SHERMAN TR UTD 6/16/05 10220 FAIRWAY DR ELLICOTT CITY, MD 21042--- 2115 WINSLOW, RACHEL NICOLE 2071 PARSON STREET NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 WOOD 11, MICHAEL M & LAURA N 25.20 31STAVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 WOODS JR, ROBERT JAMES MARILYN CHRISTINE WOODS 2159 VERMONT.LANE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 WOODSIDE,WILLIAM P &AMANDAJ } WOOLFORK, RONNIE I WORKMAN II, DAVID L 2703 37TH AVE NE I 3286 37TH AVE NE j 2010 WHITE OAK DR NAPLES, FL. 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i MORGANSTOWN, WV 26505 --- 0 i ii i I label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 105160/81;60 ' - bigpette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 0"5160/8160 9.A.4.c Packet Pg. 1 2 09l.8/09 G5o AJaAV acne algl;edwoo ww Zg x ww gZ Iewicl op 91janblt3 AnAy 0910/091-9@ utlm alglledwoo „9/9 Z x „6 ozls label WYNESS, ROBERTJ & PEGGY A XIQUES, SYLVIA XU, CHUNFENG 3825 EVERGLADES BLVD N ENRIQUE XIQUES I ZHENGYU LU r NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 6031 NW 201ST ST 15 JONES DR HIALEAH, FL 33015--- 4889 NEW PROVIDENCE, NJ 07974 --- 0 E ii E ! j i 0 i U YAKIMO, ALLEN & KATHLEEN l i ' YARDLEY, KAYLIE MERCE ; j YECK TRUST 264 N ROUTE 183 i , DANIELTHOMAS PAQUETTE I 315JACKSON ST 2- POTTSVILLE, PA 17901---8806 i 1863 ALAMEDA DR I PARIS, TN 38242--- 4164 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 _ 1 , YEDRAMANUEL I j YETTERMARY MARGARET , i ! YIDIYASMITH , J 3363 29TH AVE N E 1 PAUL STEPHEN YETTER ; 1995 PARSON STREET NAPLES, FL 34120--0 I 2306 TANGERINE LN I. NAPLES, FL 34120---5317 11 ! ii NAPLES, FL 34120---0 E E LV YRIATE, RONAL L LOPEZ ZAIDI, SYED SAEED REZA ZALDIVAR, LEONEL Q IDALMYS DORTA MENENDEZ (i LISANDRA GARCIA 15316 MARKHAM DR d 2537 NE 39TH AVE NE ; 1871 ALAMEDA DR ' CLERMONT, FL 34714 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 31420---0 N ZAMORA, CARLOS I ZAMORA, YAIMA ) i j ZANDER, JON R & DEBRA J c ODILIA RICARDO 2857 39TH AVE NE I i 2103 VERMONT LN o 2658 41ST AVE NE I ! NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1440 ! NAPLES, FL 34120-� -0 N NAPLES, FL 341207-0 I i ! a C a0o ZENAIDA GATTAMOTA REV TRUST i ZHUANG, JOSEPH ZITER, JASON M v 2295 SW 133RD CT ; ( 5253 SLATEY HOLLOW LN 2136 PARSON STREET MIAMI, FL 33175--0 I COLUMBUS, OH 43220 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 N O N ZUFERRI, EDUARDO J & AIDA L ZULUAGA, SEBASTIAN ANDERSON, LOAN 359129TH AVE N E 8106 DREAM CATCHER CIR i STEPHEN ANDERSON o NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i UNIT 3409 i ( PO BOX 44 N NAPLES, FL 34119---0 GRAND CAYMAN KY1-1601 CAYMAN ISLANDS CD � o p N ASTOLA, ALEN i ( BERTALAN, BERTA BROOKER, ESMEE E J CALLE PONTE VEDRA Y306 ; I 5900 ARMSTRONG AVE #105 ! 134 ACK LA E y URBANVACION LA ESTANCIA l CSL H4W 2Z5 CANADA j 1 BRAMHALL CHESHIR SK7 2AB ENGLAND LAMOLINA-LIMA PERU ; i d ea CADEZ, THOMAS i ' CADEZ, l HOMAS i DICARLO, STEFANO & ANNUNZIATA IL MARIJA A CADEZ i I PO BOX 571 l ' I 16 STANLEY CARBERRY DR V MARIETA & RICHARD F D CORLEY i j MILTON 1-9T 5A2 CANADA I BRAMPTON L6P OB9 .CANADA ' PO BOX 571 ' m MILTON L9T5A2 CANADA j ! ;I x GREENE, GORDON LLOYD l HERNANDEZ, ROSA LEONOR ROJAS LE, MY LE THI LI.I GEORGIA DEVOST ( APARTADO AEREO #93887 I MYCHAU NGUYEN = BONNY SEKI BOGOTA COLOMBIA 7384 GLAMORGAN WAY 54 REGINA BLVD I MISSISSAUGA 1-5N7Z4 CANADA WASAGA BCH L9Z1M8 CANADA a =140" `label size V x2 5/8" compatible with Avery°5160/8160 Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 05160/8160 Packet Pg. 1 3 09f9/09l,%AJaAV oane algjtedwoo ww L9 x ww 9Z tewlot ap attanbl13 9.A.4.c 09;L9/09t5c, AJaAV gtlrti algltedwoo „8/4 Z x „L azls laqel M DOUYON DE AZEVEDO MEDICINE RAMPURE, AJITKUMAR M ;' SCHUMACHER, HERMANN & ILZE SOCIETE PROFESSIONNELLE PARVATHI AJIT RAMPURE i BECKSTR 53 r 310 OLMSTEAD 2403 I i DARMSTADT 64287 GERMANY c OTTAWA K1L 71<3 CANADA 3650 KANEFF CRESCENT MISSISSAUGA L5A 4A1 CANADA I v TREMBLAY, SERGE 1 VELEZ, SANTA i i ( WATSON, RICHARD A v 4 DU BELVEDERE I j i 33 LITTLE ASHLEY DR I ; ; CATHERINE E WATSON L DOMAINE DES HAUTS-BOIS ! . MAPLE L6A OX3 CANADA 5 DUVAL DR t STE JULIE 13E 3M 5 CANADA I BARRIE L4M 6V2 CANADA V li = WILLIAMSON, J A & EMILY Golden Gate Estates Area Civic ASSOCIatIOn J Valencia Golf & Country Club HOA Inc. SUSAN E SMITH Inc. 1711 Double Eagle Trail 40 FRANKLIN STREET 2631 4th Street NW I Naples, FL 34120 = UXBRIDGE L9P 115 CANADA Naples, FL 34120 j E Citrus Greens at Orange Tree HOA, Inc. Waterways of Naples HOA, Inc. i w 1130 Grove Drive i 12650 Whitehall Drive Naples, FL 34120 Fort Myers, FL 33907 s ;I 1 �I II II I :I i l l I I� I II I I I �I I !I label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/8160 Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 05160/8160 Packet Pg. 1 4 9.A.4.d SIGN POSTING INSTRUCTIONS (CHAPTER 8, COLLIER COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT) A zoning sign(s) must be posted by the petition of the petitioner's agent on the parcel for a minimum of fifteen (15) calendar days in advance of the first public hearing and said sign(s) must be maintained by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent through the Board of County Commissioners Hearing. Below are general guidelines for signs, however these guidelines should not be construed to supersede any requirements of the LDC. For specific sign requirements, please refer to the Administrative Code, Chapter 8 E. 1. The sign(s) must be erected in full view of the public, not more than five (5) feet from the nearest street right-of-way or easement. 2. The sign must be securely affixed by nails, staples, or other means to a wood frame or to a wood panel and then fastened securely to a post, or other structure. The sign may no be affixed to a tree or other foliage. 3. The petitioner or the petitioner's agent must maintain the sign(s) in place, and readable condition until the requested action has been heard and a final decision rendered. If the sign(s) is destroyed, lost, or rendered unreadable, the petition or the petitioner's agent must replace the sign(s). NOTE: AFTER THE SIGN HAS BEEN POSTED, THIS AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE SHOULD BE RETURNED NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORKING DAYS BEFORE THE FIRST HEARING DATE TO THE ASSIGNED PLANNER. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER BEFORE THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, PERSONALLY APPEARED ROBERT J. MULHERE, FAICP, SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT WHO ON OATH SAYS THAT HE/SHE HAS POSTED PROPERTY NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 10.03.00 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE ON THE PARCEL COVERED IN PETITION NUMBERS PL-20200002198 AND PL-20200002204. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT OR AGENT Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, Sr. Vice President NAME (TYPED OR PRINTED) STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER Hole Montes, a Bowman Company 950 Encore Way STREET OR P.O. BOX Naples, FL 34110 CITY, STATE ZIP The forgoing instrument was sworn to and subscribed before me this 19th day of February 2024, by means of � physical presence or online notarization, by Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, Sr. Vice President, who is personally known to me <' or who has produced as identification and who did/did not take an oath. STEPHANIE KAROL _° • �,r �,`: Notary Public - State of Florida Commission M GG 965839 'for ry My Comm. Expires Mar 9, 2024 Bonded through National Notary Assn. (Stamp with serial number) A-6jy� w,v-e vaud Siggnatpurb of nNotary �PPublic (. � o o Printed Name of Notary Public Packet Pg. 1065 U c L A" O -?' t c=a E nv{ ' E M � W ` LVL V Y V• o PUBLIC HEAING NQ N N TICS Emmanuel Lutheran Church Community CD Services CFPUD (PL-2020000219B) & CD 0 Emmanuel Lutheran Church Community N 0 Facilities and Services Subdistrict N (PL-20200002204) J CCPC: MARCH 7 2024 - 9:00 a,m. a BCC: APRIL 23, �024 - 9:00 a.m. o Board of County Commissioners' Chambers u0 ao Third Floor, Collier County Government center r- 3299 Tamrami Trail East, Naples, FL 34112 Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA, csbL Plwier III: 239-252.2-1-S Katherine t:asPlanner III: 239.252.204 tley, AICP, :r rn O a 4- 0 M Q s x w E U w Packet Pg. 1067 ir fell ` r• . , # I � r Ay J + 1.1• '1+Ul , ',,. J ` nr _ + iyR t f lob TV TWW MLA -Paw J7 .• FF 7 is 41 v \ -:,T y,.,., i\, - r it .. •{`�}. r . �. -rt •'+ . _L:f - ' _j �, _ tom.- +1 gib` r��i•� +�... ;i ��;JjJ � f• �...h. a� • t +,N�. `1 1 i � a 1 �L}L' '' • 1 ... ,.••c... .Ll � � f, ,�ILG[�_ •. � � • f- i[••`; •,..s`��"'(:«'t. 'R ,. �', .,�'�. ``' � R'}�-kpr �k` Y,T,1{I �^^{; '+- .1'f ,�t �C" , �� f!' . �4 > ' '�• '7r f - � �='Y'J J'�i�-.. ► :��:i' ,:�' �'�''t.;,tp f�,`►� �. � }k' '.i�•^'Sl•\,`��+Y � '- It 11 �' '1i �'�1� ��' `� ��`',' l ,1 t �. , �'`'r'�' .t. k Y.'T`, .�"; ,, j�.t ../ •r• ' �,>. `, �3'� ,;r'. ,: � .r-• �j. �1�., �� .��v'fNV �.. ' -. `'` .t �. � ''y�"� � - 1 � Yi,•C` � � � .. t! *, r ifr` . may+. '"� _ _ _ ✓ /� . ` �v -- ,�' 1 :71 ,,�tr `.. rpr. - Y�ra ,. ?�'�far;� •1' �y}• '' �` ,i •r �! '; 1 v • 9.A.5.a c0i ier County 1%- --4- t STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ZONING DIVISION — ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT - PLANNING & REGULATION HEARING DATE: MARCH 7, 2024 SUBJECT: PUDR-PL20200002198, EMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMUNITY FACILITY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (CFPUD). COMPANION TO GMPA-PL20200002204, MISSION SUBDISTRICT OF THE GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN PROPERTY OWNER/APPLICANT AND AGENTS: Owners Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples, Inc. 777 Mooring Line Drive Naples, FL 34102 Agents: Robert Mulhere, FAICP, President/CEO Hole Montes, Inc. 950 Encore Way Naples, 34110 REQUESTED ACTION: Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire Coleman, Yovanovich and Koester, P.A. 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 Naples, FL 34103 The petitioner requests that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider amending Ordinance Number 11-23, the Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples Community Facility Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) and amending Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of an additional 14+/- acres from the Estates zoning district to Emmanuel Lutheran Church Community Facilities Planned Unit Development (CFPUD), to add principal uses including colleges and universities, social service uses, government uses, medical office, physical fitness facilities, food trucks, and recreational facilities; to add accessory uses for lodging/dormitory and retail sale of agricultural products; to revise development standards, the legal description and Master Plan. PUDR-PI20200002198, EMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH COMMUNITY SERVICES CFPUD February 22, 2024 Page 1 of 15 Packet Pg. 1069 ,v m a O 4 E E J Oil Well RD a tm PROJECT r_ 7 LOCATION W Randall BLVD Location Map 6t Lx @F TL a4 9s w 11@ Y 0 S f tl tl 0 e P • C. � i I. �� } t 11S SITE 74 @7 96 0< 111 n6 LOCATION T BIA QtA %i *TA tt ttzt C . O pi Y 91 'A � � 7 Y t I EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL 13 LTITHORAH CHURC eFPLI ®®u®nc®0®u®O IR®Q® III IINIv� i�11I I�IIi111G Petition Number: PL20200002198 Zoning Map �D D Attachment: Staff Report- Emmanuel Lutheran Church PUDR 2-6-24 [Revision 1] (27844 : PL20200002198 Emmanuel Lutheran Church a u i I 72, L— ___- 75'SETBACK D' Food Truck Landscape - Location Buffer I 1 25' Type'B'� 1 Landscape II 1 ff Buffer 6' HIGH WAL 75' SETBACK ro I a a 1 7❑ �j N y 1 - 1 m 25' TyRe'B' Landsca a LAKE I e +w =w h 4 Buffer within 75' Setback :K 1 ❑ 75'SETBACK I nn PRESERVE � (0.26 A-) N Zoned : E Estates LAKE C y ® POTENTIAL FOOD (Land Use is Single " m m rn 1 p J r— TRUCK PARKING AREA LAND USE SUMMARY Family) I ro 1 al Acres Percentage 20 Lil F Zoned: E Estates Development Area 23.58 65.65 % I r -� n 1(Land Use is Vacant) Landscape Buffers/ Setback 5.07 14.11 % - 25' Type'B' Landscape Buffer 1 N 75'SETBACK Sports Fields L32 3.81 % 1 _ _ — _ _wit=in 75' Setback _ _ L — 1 Lake 5.69 15.81 % � - - � I Preserve Area 0.26 0.75 % Zoned : E Estates 1 (Land Use is Single Family; 1 Total 35.92 100.00 % Development Intensity per Sec. D of CFPUD Vacant) I 1 Maximum total floor area = 90,000 s.f. 75' SETBACK 1 LAKE I Minimum Open Space Required/ Provided: Maximum Principal Structure Height 1 35.92 Acres X 30 % = 10.78 Acres . Zoned height = 30 feet maximum 75' SETBACK 1 • Actual height = 38 feet maximum for all structures I 1 Preserves can be used to meet L.D.0 required landscape other than Worship Center I buffer in accordance with Exhibit F, section 2.B of the 1 CFPUD. Worship Center m Zoned height = 35 feet maximum g 1 Lakes shown are conceptual and may change during the . Actual height = 42 feet maximum a 1 SDP process. ,c Deviations IN � LAK I Minimum Native Vegetation Required/ Provided = 1.7 Acres x 15 Percent = 0.26 (plus/minus) Acres 1❑ See list of Requested Deviations 1 20' 4gpe-`D' L pe 1 NOTES: 1 Buffer All stacking shall occur within the development with no r -within 75' Setback_ impacts on Oil Well Road for all uses. � 31ST AVE. NE L�J EMMANUEL EVANGELICALjjd�gd : .PEFL.110 9q EDR 096CM ..-. "a� EXHIBIT C � sosscMPos �as37-t LUTHERAN CHURCH P"o e: (239)].. q0 +� Flo�itleC 'fi® O C.F.P.U.D. MASTER PLAN 1 . W HOLE MONTE Aumo�non No.nn 2006.096A 1 Or 1 20' Type'D' — — — — O.R. 4703 PG. ------- Landscape Buffer- _ - — - 2424 _ R.O.W TAKE 6'HIGH WALL- -- _�r� 75' SETBACK II At Fields LAKE 1 I I / Attachment: Staff Report- Emmanuel Lutheran Church PUDR 2-6-24 [Revision 1] (27844 : PL20200002198 Emmanuel Lutheran Church 9.A.5.a GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property, consisting of 35.92± acres, is located on the south side of Oil Well Road approximately one -quarter mile west of the intersection of Everglades Boulevard and Oil Well Road in Section 19, Township 48 South, Range 28 East, Collier County, Florida. (See the Location Map on page 2 of this Staff Report.) PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The Emmanual Lutheran Church of Naples CFPUD is currently 21.72± acres and was originally rezoned by Ordinance Number 11-23 (see Attachment B), and an Insubstantial Change was approved by HEX Decision 2015-49 (see Attachment Q. The CFPUD currently allows for 90,000 s.f. of the following not -for -profit uses: - A 1,000-seat church - 300 child day care services, - 450 student private school(s), - social services, - job training and vocational rehabilitation services - medical outreach to the community The current PUD also allows ten single-family residences as an alternative to the church and its related uses. HEX Decision 2015-49 allows an athletic field as an interim accessory use before the construction of a principal use. The CFUD is currently partially developed, with an athletic field and a pavilion in the site's northwest corner. The petitioner proposes adding 14.2 acres to the PUD, increasing the subject site from 21.72 to 35.92± acres. The PUD will be amended to: - to decrease the number of Day Care Center participants from 300 to 200 - to add a maximum of 300 not -for -profit college/university students; - to add a maximum of 3,600 s.f of not -for -profit medical office use; - to add not -for -profit physical fitness facilities; - to add essential services; - to add United States Postal Service (except for a major distribution center); - to increase the number of single-family homes from 10 to 16 homes as an alternative to the proposed nonresidential uses; - to add interim agricultural activities; - to add a maximum of 4 food trucks; - to add garden plots and - to add recreational facilities. PUDR-PL20200002198, EMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH COMMUNITY SERVICES CFPUD February 22, 2024 Page 4 of 15 Packet Pg. 1072 9.A.5.a The Master Plan has also been updated to reflect the proposed changes on page 3. See attached Attachment A -Proposed Ordinance. SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: North: Oil Well Road, a four -lane divided road, and then developed and undeveloped residential land, with a zoning designation of Estates (E) East: Developed residential land, with a zoning designation of Estates (E) South: Developed and undeveloped residential land, with a zoning designation of Estates (E) West: Developed residential land, with a zoning designation of Estates (E) AERIAL PHOTO PUDR-PL20200002198, EMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH COMMUNITY SERVICES CFPUD February 22, 2024 Page 5 of 15 Packet Pg. 1073 9.A.5.a GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: Comprehensive Planning staff has reviewed the proposed PUD Rezone and found it inconsistent with the GMP. The proposed principal land uses of medical offices and food trucks are commercial uses, not community facility uses, and are not supported by Comprehensive Planning staff. However, if the commercial uses are removed, the proposed PUD could be consistent with the GMP. For further information, please see Attachment D-GMP Consistency Review Memorandum. Transportation Element: In evaluating this project, staff reviewed the applicant's February 20, 2023, Transportation Impact Statement (TIS) for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) using the 2022 Annual Update and Inventory Reports (AUIR). Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP states: "The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occurs: a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and c. For all other links, the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project's significant impacts on all roadways. " Transportation Planning staff has evaluated the TIS submitted with the proposed petition and has found that the proposed Emmanuel Church Amendment will add an estimated +/- 132 PM peak hour two-way new trips on the adjacent roadway network. The current PUD generates an estimated +/- 323 PM peak hour two-way trips, resulting in a new total estimate of +/- 455 PM peak hour two- way trips for this PUD. The additional trips will impact the following roadway network links: PUDR-PL20200002198, EMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH COMMUNITY SERVICES CFPUD February 22, 2024 Page 6 of 15 Packet Pg. 1074 9.A.5.a Link Roadway Link 2021 2022 PM P.M. Peak 2021 2022 # Location AUIR AUIR Peak Hr. Hour Peak AUIR AUIR LOS LOS Peak Dir Direction Remaining Remaining Project Service Capacity Capacity Vol. Volume/Peak Direction 119.0 Oil Well Immokalee D D 23/WB 21200East 402 502 Road Rd to Project 119.0 Oil Well Project to D D 43/EB 2,200East 402 502 Road Everglades Staff notes that the roadway network has sufficient capacity to accommodate the proposed Emmanuel Lutheran Church PUD Amendment. Therefore, the proposed development is consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan within the 5-year planning period, and the Transportation Planning staff recommends approval of the request. Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental Planning staff has found this project to be consistent with the CCME. The proposed changes do not affect any of the GMP's environmental requirements. GMP Conclusion: The proposed PUD Rezone may be deemed consistent with the FLUE of the GMP subject to the removal of the commercial land uses and the adoption of the proposed GMPA. STAFF ANALYSIS: Staff completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition, including the criteria upon which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in Land Development Code (LDC) Section 10.02.13 B.5., Planning Commission Recommendation (commonly referred to as the "PUD Findings"), and Section 10.02.08 F., Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission Report (referred to as "Rezone Findings"), which establish the legal basis to support the Collier County Planning Commission's (CCPC) recommendation. The CCPC uses these same criteria as the basis for their recommendation to the Board of Collier County Commissioners (BCC), who in turn use the criteria to support their action on the rezoning request. An evaluation relative to these subsections is discussed below under the heading "Zoning and Land Development Review." In addition, staff offers the following analysis: Environmental Review: Environmental Planning staff has reviewed the PUD petition to address environmental concerns. The proposed PUD changes will not affect any of the environmental requirements of the PUD document (Ordinance 11-23). A minimum of 0.26 acres of native vegetation (1.7 acres x 15%) will be placed in preservation and dedicated to Collier County. No listed animal species were observed within the property; however, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) wildlife data indicates the presence of Black Bear (Ursus americanus floridanus) in the area. A black bear management plan will need to be included at PPL or SDP. PUDR-PI20200002198, EMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH COMMUNITY SERVICES CFPUD February 22, 2024 Page 7 of 15 Packet Pg. 1075 9.A.5.a This project does not require an Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. Environmental Services staff recommends approval of the proposed petition. Transportation Review: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petition for compliance with the GMP and the LDC and recommends approval of this project. Utility Review: The subject property is within the Collier County Water Sewer District (CCWSD), though not within the current water, wastewater, and irrigation quality (I.Q.) water service areas. Connection of the property to CCWSD facilities shall be made in accordance with the Interim Facilities/System Agreement for Potable Water Facilities and Wastewater Facilities with Emmanuel Lutheran Church of Naples, Inc., a Florida corporation. The Public Utilities Department recommends approval of this petition subject to the following Conditions: 1. The Interim Facilities/System Agreement for Potable Water Facilities and Wastewater Facilities with Emmanuel Lutheran Church of Naples, Inc., a Florida corporation, shall be adopted concurrently with the Emmanuel Lutheran Church PUD Ordinance. Any improvements to the CCWSD's water or wastewater systems necessary to provide sufficient capacity to serve the project will be the responsibility of the owner/developer and will be conveyed to the CCWSD at no cost to the County at the time of utility acceptance. Zoning and Land Development Review: Currently, the subject property is partially developed with an athletic field in the site's northwest corner. As previously stated, the CFPUD currently allows for 90,000 s.f. of uses, including a 1,000-seat church and related social services (community center), a 300-person daycare facility, job training, and vocational rehabilitation services, a 450-person private school, or as an alternative to the church and its related uses, ten single-family residences. The proposed CFPUD seeks to add 14± acres to the PUD, increasing it to 35.92± acres. The PUD will be amended to: - to decrease the number of Day Care Center participants from 300 to 200 - to add a maximum of 300 not -for -profit college/university students; - to add a maximum of 3,600 s.f. of not -for -profit medical office use; - to add not -for -profit physical fitness facilities; - to add essential services; - to add United States Postal Service (except for a major distribution center); - to increase the number of single-family homes from 10 to 16 homes as an alternative to the proposed nonresidential uses; - to add interim agricultural activities; - to add a maximum of 4 food trucks; - to add garden plots and PUDR-PL20200002198, EMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH COMMUNITY SERVICES CFPUD February 22, 2024 Page 8 of 15 Packet Pg. 1076 9.A.5.a - to add recreational facilities. The proposed medical office and food truck uses are not consistent with the subject Community Facilities PUD, as they are commercial land uses, not community facility land uses. Therefore, staff recommends the following Conditions of Approval: 2. The proposed medical office use shall be removed from the CFPUD. 3. The proposed principal food truck land use shall become an accessory land use, and the operating hours shall be limited to that of an operating principal land use within the subject PUD. The proposed Development Standards are the same as the previously approved standards. The PUD perimeter setbacks remain at 75 feet from the external PUD property line. The proposed building heights are the same as the previously approved building heights of 2 stories, not to exceed 30 feet zoned or 38 feet actual building height; the Worship Center remains at 35 feet zoned and 42 feet actual. The proposed zoned building heights of 30 feet and 35 feet are similar to the building height of 30 feet in the base zoning E zoning designation. The Master Plan depicts the 30% required open space and landscape buffers. The applicant has provided additional landscape buffering, a 25-foot wide Type B landscape buffer instead of the minimum required 15-foot wide buffer along the Estates zoned properties. Access to the site will be from Oil Well Road. Staff finds the proposed changes compatible with the neighborhood subject to the conditions of approval above. REZONE FINDINGS: Staff completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition, including the criteria upon which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in LDC Subsection 10.02.13 B.5., Planning Commission Recommendation (commonly referred to as the "PUD Findings"), and Subsection 10.02.08 F., Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission Report (referred to as "Rezone Findings"), which establish the legal bases to support the CCPC's recommendation. The CCPC uses these same criteria as the basis for their recommendation to the BCC, who in turn use the criteria to support their action on the rezoning request. An evaluation relative to these subsections is discussed below under the heading "Zoning and Land Development Review Analysis." In addition, staff offers the following analysis: 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, policies, future land use map, and the elements of the GMP. The Comprehensive Planning staff has indicated that the proposed PUD Rezone is not consistent with all applicable elements of the FLUE of the GMP. However, the petition could be found consistent with the GMP if the staff conditions of approval and the companion GMPA are adopted. PUDR-PI20200002198, EMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH COMMUNITY SERVICES CFPUD February 22, 2024 Page 9 of 15 Packet Pg. 1077 9.A.5.a 2. The existing land use pattern. As described in the "Surrounding Land Use and Zoning" portion of this report and discussed in the zoning review analysis, the neighborhood's existing land use pattern can be characterized as developed and undeveloped residential to the north, south, east, and west. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. When the subject property was rezoned to a PUD, it was deemed of sufficient size and did not result in an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. The proposed PUD Rezone does not change this finding if the staff -recommended conditions of approval are adopted. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. The district boundaries are logically drawn, as discussed in Items 2 and 3. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed rezone necessary. The proposed change is not necessary, but it is being requested in compliance with the LDC provisions to seek such changes because the petitioner wishes to expand the church and the related activities to better serve the surrounding community. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. Development in compliance with the proposed PUD Rezone should not adversely impact living conditions in the area if the staff -recommended conditions of approval are adopted. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. The roadway infrastructure has sufficient capacity to serve the proposed PUD rezone. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. The overall drainage system is in place. The proposed PUD Rezone will not create a drainage problem. Furthermore, the project is subject to the requirements of Collier County and the South Florida Water Management District. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. PUDR-PI20200002198, EMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH COMMUNITY SERVICES CFPUD February 22, 2024 Page 10 of 15 Packet Pg. 1078 9.A.5.a The proposed PUD Rezone will not reduce light and air to adjacent areas inside or outside the PUD. Furthermore, the PUD Document provides adequate property development regulations to ensure light and air should not be seriously reduced to adjacent areas. The Master Plan further demonstrates that the locations of the open space areas and 25-foot wide landscape buffers should further ensure light and air should not be seriously reduced to adjacent areas. 10. Whether the proposed change would adversely affect property values in the adjacent area. Staff could find no evidence that the proposed PUD Rezone will adversely impact property values. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. Approximately half of the properties around the proposed PUD are developed. The basic premise underlying all of the development standards in the LDC is that their sound application, when combined with the SDP approval process and PPL process, gives reasonable assurance that a change in zoning will not result in deterrence to improvement or development of adjacent property. Therefore, the proposed zoning change should not be a deterrent to the improvement of adjacent properties. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. The proposed Emmanuel Lutheran Church Community Services CFPUD, a community facilities PUD, does not grant special privileges to an individual owner. The Community Services CFPUD will support public welfare by providing not -for -profit services, including colleges and universities, social services, including counseling centers, disaster services, helping hand services, neighborhood outreach programs, relief services, medical outreach to the community, physical fitness facilities, essential services, and recreational facilities. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. The subject property could be developed within the parameters of the existing zoning designations. However, the petitioner is seeking this PUD Rezone to add property and land uses into the PUD in compliance with LDC provisions. The proposed Rezone meets the intent of the PUD district. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the neighborhood's or the county's needs. Based on the staff s review of the proposed PUD Rezone, this petition has not been deemed as out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or County if staff s conditions are approved. 15. Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. PUDR-PI20200002198, EMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH COMMUNITY SERVICES CFPUD February 22, 2024 Page 11 of 15 Packet Pg. 1079 9.A.5.a There may be other sites in the County that could accommodate the uses proposed; however, this is not the determining factor when evaluating the appropriateness of a zoning decision. The petition was reviewed on its merit for compliance with the GMP and the LDC, and staff does not review other sites in conjunction with a specific petition. 16. The property's physical characteristics and the degree of site alteration that would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. A small portion of the property is developed with buildings, parking, and water management. According to the petitioner, future development and redevelopment will require site alteration. Furthermore, future development will undergo evaluation relative to all federal, state, and local development regulations during the SDP approval process and again later as part of the building permit process. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County GMP and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, as amended. The development will have to meet all applicable criteria set forth in the LDC regarding Adequate Public Facilities. The project must also be consistent with all applicable goals and objectives of the GMP regarding adequate public facilities. This petition has been reviewed by county staff responsible for jurisdictional elements of the GMP as part of the rezoning process, and staff has concluded that the developer has provided appropriate commitments so that the impacts to the Level of Service (LOS) will be minimized. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in protecting public health, safety, and welfare. To be determined by the BCC during its advertised public hearing. PUD FINDINGS: LDC Section 10.02.13.13.5 states that "In support of its recommendation, the CCPC shall make findings as to the PUD Master Plan's compliance with the following criteria:" 1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. The subject property is within the Collier County Water Sewer District (CCWSD), though not within the current water, wastewater, and irrigation quality (LQ.) water service areas. PUDR-PI20200002198, EMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH COMMUNITY SERVICES CFPUD February 22, 2024 Page 12 of 15 Packet Pg. 1080 9.A.5.a Any improvements to the CCWSD's water or wastewater systems necessary to provide sufficient capacity to serve the project will be the responsibility of the owner/developer and will be conveyed to the CCWSD at no cost to the County at the time of utility acceptance. Z Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for Rezones in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Documents submitted with the application provided satisfactory evidence of unified control of the property. Additionally, the development will be required to gain SDP approval. These processes will ensure that the developer will provide appropriate stipulations for providing, continuing operation of, and maintaining infrastructure. 3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the GMP's goals, objectives, and policies. County staff has reviewed this petition and offered an analysis of the GMP's relevant goals, objectives, and policies within the GMP discussion of this staff report. Based on that analysis, staff have found this petition to be inconsistent with the overall GMP. However, if the commercial land uses are removed and the companion GMPA is adopted, staff could find the petition consistent. 4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. The landscaping and buffering standards are compatible with the adjacent uses. Staff has concluded that this Rezone will not change the project's internal and external compatibility. 5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. The amount of open space set aside for this project meets the minimum requirement of the LDC 6. The timing or sequence of development to assure the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. The roadway infrastructure is sufficient to serve the proposed project, as noted in the Transportation Element consistency review. Operational impacts will be addressed at the time of the first development order (SDP or Plat), at which time a new TIS will be required to demonstrate turning movements for all site access points. Finally, the project's development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals, including but not limited to any plats and or site development plans, are sought. 7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. PUDR-PI20200002198, EMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH COMMUNITY SERVICES CFPUD February 22, 2024 Page 13 of 15 Packet Pg. 1081 9.A.5.a Ability, as applied in this context, implies supporting infrastructure such as wastewater disposal systems, potable water supplies, and the capacity of roads. The subject property has the ability to support expansion based upon the commitments made by the petitioner and the fact that adequate public facilities requirements will be addressed when development approvals are sought. 8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. This criterion requires evaluating the extent to which development standards and deviations proposed for this PUD depart from development standards that would be required for the most similar conventional zoning district. The petitioner is seeking one new deviation related to temporary events. DEVIATION DISCUSSION: The petitioner is seeking one new deviation, Deviation #2, from the requirements of the LDC. The deviation is found in PUD Exhibit E, "List of Deviations." The petitioner's rationale and staff analysis/recommendation are outlined below. Deviation #2 Deviation #2 seeks relief from LDC 5.04.05. F.1. "Temporary Event Time Limits" to allow sports, religious, and community events for a maximum of 42 event days per calendar year. Petitioners Justification: The applicant requests that the time limit for temporary events be extended to 42 days (rather than 28 days). The subject property is larger than a typical church campus (36 acres) and has access directly from an arterial. Substantial setbacks and buffers will be provided to adjacent residential properties, limiting potential impacts to neighboring sites. While the principal use of the site is a church, the intention is to create a community campus that will include education and social service, and the additional 14 days for religious and community events will allow them more flexibility to serve the community better. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Zoning and Land Development Review staff recommend Approval, finding that, in compliance with LDC section 10.02.13.A.3., the petitioner has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community" and LDC section 10.02.13.B.5.h the petitioner as demonstrated that the deviation is "justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to the literal application of such regulations." NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): The applicant conducted a NIM on September 30, 2021, at Collier County OF/IFAS Extension, located at 14700 Immokalee Road, Naples, Florida. Approximately seven residents attended the meeting along with the Agent's team, the Applicant, and county staff; due to the passing of over a year, another NIM was held on August 14, 2023, at Collier County OF/IFAS Extension, located at PUDR-PI20200002198, EMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH COMMUNITY SERVICES CFPUD February 22, 2024 Page 14 of 15 Packet Pg. 1082 9.A.5.a 14700 Immokalee Road, Naples, Florida. Approximately five residents, the Agent's team, the Applicant, and county staff attended the meeting. For further information, see attached Attachment E NIM Summaries. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney's Office reviewed the Staff Report for this petition on February 6, 2024. RECOMMENDATION: Planning and Zoning Review staff recommends that the CCPC forward Petition PUDR- PL20200002198, Emmanuel Lutheran Church Community Services CFPUD, to the BCC with a recommendation of approval subject to the adoption of the companion GMPA and the following conditions of approval: 1. The Interim Facilities/System Agreement for Potable Water Facilities and Wastewater Facilities with Emmanuel Lutheran Church of Naples, Inc., a Florida corporation, shall be adopted concurrently with the Emmanuel Lutheran Church PUD Ordinance. 2. The proposed medical office use shall be removed from the CFPUD. 3. The proposed principal food truck land use shall become an accessory land use, and the operating hours shall be limited to that of an operating principal land use within the subject PUD. Attachments: Attachment A: Proposed PUD Ordinance Attachment B: Ordinance Number 11-23 Attachment C: HEX Decision 2015-49 Attachment D: GMP Consistency Review Memorandum Attachment E: NIM Summaries Attachment F: Application PUDR-PI20200002198, EMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH COMMUNITY SERVICES CFPUD February 22, 2024 Page 15 of 15 Packet Pg. 1083 9.A.5.b ORDINANCE NO. 2024- AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 11-23, THE EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH OF NAPLES, INC. COMMUNITY FACILITIES PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF AN ADDITIONAL 14f ACRES FROM THE ESTATES (E) ZONING DISTRICT TO EMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMUNITY FACILITIES PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (CFPUD), TO ADD PRINCIPAL USES INCLUDING COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES, SOCIAL SERVICE USES, GOVERNMENT USES, MEDICAL OFFICE, PHYSICAL FITNESS FACILITIES, FOOD TRUCKS AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES; TO ADD ACCESSORY USES FOR LODGING/DORMITORY AND RETAIL SALE OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS; TO REVISE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND MASTER PLAN, FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF OIL WELL ROAD, IN SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 35.92f ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PL20200002198] WHEREAS, Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire of Coleman Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. and Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP of Hole Montes, Inc., representing Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples, Inc., petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: The zoning classification of approximately 14± acres of the herein described real property is changed from the Estates (E) Zoning District to a Community Facilities Planned Unit [21-CPS-02110/1838911/1] 112 r Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church Q PL20200002198 Page 1 of 2 1/19/24 Packet Pg. 1084 9.A.5.b Development (CFPUD) Zoning District to be added together with the 21.72± acre existing Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples, Inc. CFPUD for a 35.92± acre project to be known as the Emmanuel Lutheran Church Community Services CFPUD in accordance with revised Exhibits A through F, attached hereto and incorporated herein and by reference made part hereof. The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps, as described in Ordinance Number 2004- 41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, is/are hereby amended accordingly. SECTION TWO: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State and upon the date that the Growth Management Plan Amendment in Ordinance No. becomes effective. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super -majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this ATTEST: CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK , Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legality: day of , 2024. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA LON Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney Attachments: Exhibit A - Permitted Uses Exhibit B - Development Standards Exhibit C - Master Plan Exhibit D - Legal Description Exhibit E - Deviations from the LDC Exhibit F - Development Commitments [21-CPS-02110/1838911/1] 112 Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church PL20200002198 Page 2 of 2 1/19/24 CHRIS HALL, Chairman Packet Pg. 1085 9.A.5.b EXHIBIT "A" LIST OF PERMITTED USES EMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMUNITY FACILITIES PUD CFPUD A maximum of 90,000 S.F. of total floor area is allowed in this Community Facilities PUD. No building or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: SIC GROUP No building or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: 1. Churches and Places of Worship, not to exceed 1,000 seats. 8661 2. Child Care Services, limited to 200 attendees. 8351 Not for- profit and operated with. a ruhur--eh er-- plaee of wofship 84-554 o _, 3. Private or Public Schools, not to exceed 450 students. 8211 4. Colleges and Universities 8221 Must be not -for -profit, not to exceed 300 students. 4.5. Social Services, individual and family (activity centers, elderly or handicapped only; counseling centers; day care centers, adult and handicapped only); disaster services; helping hand services; 8322 meal delivery programs; multiservice centers, neighborhood; outreach programs; relief services, temporary; service leagues; must be not for profit. worship pefmitted i this GFPUn 5 6. Job training and vocational rehabilitation services — must be not 8331 for profit pefmitted i this rFDT rT' Vocational rehabilitation services shall Page 1 of 15 Words underlined are additions; words struck through are deletions. H:\2006\2006096A\WP\CFPUD\1-18-2024\Emmanuel Lutheran Church Community Services CFPUD (PL20200002198) (1-18-2024).doc Packet Pg. 1086 9.A.5.b not include uses such as outboard or diesel engine repair that could emit noise beyond the boundaries of the s*eet prepertyCFPUD. 6 7. Medical outreach to the community, to include activities such as administering influenza vaccine, checking blood pressure and conducting blood donation drives. Must be not for profit. operated with ehufeh aeeof worship pefmitted in this GFPUB. 8. Medical Office 8011 Physician clinics or offices, not to exceed 3,600 sq. ft. Must be not -for -profit. 9. Physical Fitness Facilities 7991 Must be not -for -profit and operated with a church or place of worship permitted in this CFPUD. 10. Essential services, including law enforcement, fire, emergency medical services and facilities, public park, and public library services and facilities, including a mobile or manufactured home for use by a sheriff's deputy (and family). 11. United States Postal Service 4311 Except major distribution center. Page 2 of 15 Words underlined are additions; words struck through are deletions. H:\2006\2006096A\WP\CFPUD\1-18-2024\Emmanuel Lutheran Church Community Services CFPUD (PL20200002198) (1-18-2024).doc Packet Pg. 1087 9.A.5.b 7-.12. Single family residential dwellings as an alternative to non- residential uses permitted in this CFPUD, not to exceed sixteen (16) single-family homes. (Also see Exhibit B — Development Intensity) 13. Interim agricultural activities, including, but not limited to: Crop raising; horticulture; fruit and nut production; forestry; groves; nurseries; ranching; beekeeping; poultry and egg production; milk production; livestock raising, and aquaculture for native species subject to Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission permits; these uses are interim uses allowed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any other permitted principal use. 14. Mobile Food Dispensing Vehicles (MFDVs), as further 5963 regulated and limited in Exhibit "F" — DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS FOR THE PROJECT, Paragraph 4.a. 15. Garden Plots, to be utilized by church members or students and their families. Garden plots will be located proximate to a school or church or other place of worship. Recreational facilities including outdoor Dlav areas and athletic field, administration offices and facilities, and youth recreation centers indoor to support church uses. The athletic field shall be 16. limited to the location depicted on the PUD Master Plan as "Football/Soccer Field" and "Softball Field." shall be allowed a„ an interim basis, i3rivrto the-eonstydetio„ir of a or -in listed inipcafar ,,rangy' A. of Exhibit n of the PUD [HEX 20 c not rrzr.-vr�rrrorc �fvrcrr�rcv—�zr�� co-r� �77 817. Any other principal and related use that is determined to be comparable to the foregoing by the Board of Zoning Appeals or Hearing Examiner pursuant to the process outlined in the Land Development Code (LDC); however, soup kitchens and homeless shelters are prohibited. B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses customarily associated with Permitted Principal Uses including but not limited to: EL. • . • I, W� Page 3 of 15 Words underlined are additions; words struck through are deletions. H:\2006\2006096A\WP\CFPUD\1-18-2024\Emmanuel Lutheran Church Community Services CFPUD (PL20200002198) (1-18-2024).doc Packet Pg. 1088 9.A.5.b �asrazrrErrr� . .AD I .� 1_ Temporary seasonal sales (e.g. pumpkin or Christmas tree sales) and other special events (e.g. open air farmers market,) are permitted subject to the issuance of a Temporary Use Permit as set forth in LDC Sec. 5.04.05, except that the sum total of all such special events (e.g. open air farmers market) shall not exceed 100 days in any calendar year. 2. Water and wastewater facilities serving this CFPUD only, subject to an interim utilities agreement. Plots,3. Gar -den lifnited to an aeeessefy use to the Ghufehes and Plaees of Worship, SIC 8661. Gar -den Plots be allowed on an interim basis prior -to the allowable —Aceessefy Use after —the eens4uetier of Ghwehes and Plxees of 3. Lodging House/Dormitory, associated with church retreats or church training programs (SIC 7041), up to 20 rooms. 4. Accessory uses customary to religious uses, such as a community hall or residential facilities to serve as a rectory. 5. Retail sale of fresh, unprocessed agricultural products, grown primarily on the property and subject to a review of traffic circulation, parking, and safety concerns pursuant to the submission of a site improvement plan as provided for in LDC Section 10.02.03. 6. Any other accessory use and related use that is determined to be comparable to the foregoing by the Board of Zoning Appeals or Hearing Examiner, pursuant to the process outlined in the Land Development Code (LDC). C. Preserve Area Uses: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for the preserve area depicted on the CFPUD Master Plan other than the following: Page 4 of 15 Words underlined are additions; words struck through are deletions. H:\2006\2006096A\WP\CFPUD\1-18-2024\Emmanuel Lutheran Church Community Services CFPUD (PL20200002198) (1-18-2024).doc Packet Pg. 1089 9.A.5.b 1. Passive recreation areas such as pervious nature trails or boardwalks are allowed in the preserve area, as long as any clearing required to facilitate these uses does not impact the minimum required area to be preserved. 2. Any other conservation related use that is determined to be comparable to the foregoing by the Board of Zoning Appeals or Hearing Examiner, pursuant to the process outlined in the Land Development Code (LDC). Page 5 of 15 Words underlined are additions; words struck through are deletions. H:\2006\2006096A\WP\CFPUD\1-18-2024\Emmanuel Lutheran Church Community Services CFPUD (PL20200002198) (1-18-2024).doc Packet Pg. 1090 9.A.5.b EXHIBIT "B" DEVELOPMENTSTANDARDS EMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMUNITY FACILITIES PUD CFPUD Development of the EMMANUEL EVANGEL! LUTHERAN CHURCH COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMUNITY FACILITIES PUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this Ordinance and applicable sections of the LDC and Growth Management Plan (GMP) in effect at the time of issuance of any development order, such as, but not limited to, final subdivision plat, final site development plan, excavation permit, and preliminary work authorization, to which such regulations relate. Where these regulations fail to provide developmental standards, then the provisions of the most similar district, the Community Facility District (CF) of the LDC shall apply. Table I below sets forth the development standards for land uses within the PUD. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or subdivision plat. TABLE I COMMUNITY FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS A. PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES MINIMUM LOT AREA MINIMUM LOT WIDTH MINIMUM FLOOR AREA PERIMETER SETBACKS MINIMUM FRONT YARD MINIMUM SIDE YARD MINIMUM REAR YARD MINIMUM PRESERVE SETBACK N/A N/A N/A 75 feet east property line 75 feet west and southwest property line 75 feet south property line 75 feet north property line 25 feet 25 feet or perimeter setback whichever is greater 25 feet or perimeter setback whichever is greater 25 feet Page 6 of 15 Words underlined are additions; words struck through are deletions. H:\2006\2006096A\WP\CFPUD\1-18-2024\Emmanuel Lutheran Church Community Services CFPUD (PL20200002198) (1-18-2024).doc Packet Pg. 1091 9.A.5.b MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES 1/z building zoned height (BH) MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT 2 stories not to exceed 30 feet zoned building height or 38 feet actual building height; however, the Worship Center shall not exceed a zoned height of 35 feet and an actual height of 42 feet. B. ACCESSORY STRUCTURES FRONT SETBACK 25 feet (see *Note 1) SIDE SETBACK 10 feet or perimeter setback whichever is greater REAR SETBACK 10 feet or perimeter setback whichever is greater PRESERVE SETBACK 10 feet or perimeter setback whichever is greater PERIMETER SETBACK 75 feet MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN ACCESSORY STRUCTURES 10 feet MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT NOT TO EXCEED 1 story, not to exceed 25 feet zoned building height and 30 feet actual BH *Note 1 Athletic field is pemi#ed in sethaek area ineluding and portions of the existing lakes are permitted in the setback area as shown on CFPUD Master Plan;_ C. STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL USE Residential uses in accordance with the Estates District if non-residential uses are not developed on the subject property. D. DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY 1. A maximum of 90,000 S.F. of total floor area is allowed in this Community Facilities PUD and the number of seats for the Worship Center shall not exceed 1,000 seats. Page 7 of 15 Words underlined are additions; words struck through are deletions. H:\2006\2006096A\WP\CFPUD\1-18-2024\Emmanuel Lutheran Church Community Services CFPUD (PL20200002198) (1-18-2024).doc Packet Pg. 1092 9.A.5.b 2. Maximum number of elementary and secondary school students is 450. 3. Maximum number of college/university students is 300. 4. Maximum number of Day Care Center paftieipants attendees is 3-00 200. 5. A maximum of 3,600 sq. ft. of medical office is allowed. 4.6. In lieu of permitted community facilities allowed by this CFPUD, 0) sixteen (16) single family dwelling units are permitted. 7. Maximum number of lodging house/dormitory rooms is 20. E. LANDSCAPING 1. Seventy five foot (75') wide buffer areas are required along the east, west and southwest property lines abutting residential development as shown on the CFPUD Master Plan. However, play fields are permitted in a portion of the 75 foot wide buffer area shown on the west and southwest property lines along with an existing lake. 2. A twenty five—foot (20') wide Type "D" buffer is required along Oil Well Road and twenty-five foot (25') wide Type "B" buffers are required along the east, west and southwest south property lines as shown on the CFPUD Master Plan. F. LIGHTING (Per Policy 544 4.2.5 of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan, Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element and as set forth below): Consistent with public safety requirements and the International Dark Skies Association's best practices, street, recreational and structure lighting shall be placed, constructed and maintained in such manner as to prevent or reduce light pollution. The following standards shall apply: a. If a streetlight or an area light is required, it shall be of the type specified to protect neighboring properties from direct glare. Area lighting shall be shielded such that direct rays do not pass property lines. Low pr-essufe sedi ,m lamps are Lighting with a lower color temperature (3,000K and below) is required for site lighting. 1. Where required, the s, eet la shall be f the high r o v ,.,1;,,.,., t-,ry and have a headsite/street lighting will be "flat bottom" style or be fully shielded so that light is directed only downward. Street shall be mounted e a wood pole a4 ., height and wattage reeommended-by the appropriate -eleetrictrtility and �te-for- a r- l area. Light poles shall not exceed a height of 25 feet. Page 8 of 15 Words underlined are additions; words struck through are deletions. H:\2006\2006096A\WP\CFPUD\1-18-2024\Emmanuel Lutheran Church Community Services CFPUD (PL20200002198) (1-18-2024).doc Packet Pg. 1093 9.A.5.b 2. Parking lot lamps shall by low " o e sedittm Vfpelamps and- shall be mounted so that they point downward without direct rays extending past the parking lot, building entrance, walkway, or other area intended to be illuminated. b. Where lighting of recreational areas is required, such lighting shall be mounted so as to focus illumination on the areas intended to be illuminated, and to limit the amount of light that extends outside of the intended area. Color temperature of recreation lighting (athletic field lighting,) shall be as recommended by Illuminating EngineeringSociety (IES) standards. C. All lighting associated with the Athletic Field shall be turned off no later than 9:30 P.M. G. ATHLETIC FIELD OPERATION 1. The Athletic Field shall only be permitted to be in use between the hours of 7:00 A.M. and 9:00 P.M. 2. If constructed as an interim accessory use, prior to the construction of another principal use, the following standards shall apply fHEX 2015-491: a. The athletic field will only be used during daylight hours and will not be lighted, until such time as a principal use is constructed. b. Temporary sanitary facilities that are ADA accessible shall be provided. c. Use of the athletic field shall be limited to members of the congregation and their guests. d. Up to two (2) on -premises directional signs are allowed. Each sign shall not exceed six (6) square feet in size. 01 flll lll.[I�IINMIl�IIlMr ----------------- fe. Traffic control for peak events will be provided by the owner if it is determined to be warranted by the Collier County Growth Management Division or the Collier County Sheriff's Office. Page 9 of 15 Words underlined are additions; words struck through are deletions. H:\2006\2006096A\WP\CFPUD\1-18-2024\Emmanuel Lutheran Church Community Services CFPUD (PL20200002198) (1-18-2024).doc Packet Pg. 1094 9.A.5.b H. GARDEN PLOTS 1. U-Pick or similar commercial farm operation is prohibited. 2. The maximum area for the garden plots shall be limited to 10% of property or ±2 acres. 3. Garden plots shall be located outside the 75 foot perimeter setback areas. 54. Access to garden plots and parking areas shall be a gravel surface. 65. Temporary sanitary facilities shall be provided. -6. A Site Improvement Plan shall be required to be approved by the County prior to the utilization of garden plots. I. WALLS 1. A six-foot high wall shall be constructed as shown on the CFPUD Master Plan adjacent to resideR4ial d&ve',,,.., e to the south and west of the Athletic Field. The wall shall be constructed prior to the utilization of the Athletic Field. Page 10 of 15 Words underlined are additions; words struck through are deletions. H:\2006\2006096A\WP\CFPUD\1-18-2024\Emmanuel Lutheran Church Community Services CFPUD (PL20200002198) (1-18-2024).doc Packet Pg. 1095 9.A.5.b x iv 20- Type Ty Landscape Buffer._ — 6' H€GH WALL 75' SETBACK— - i I 25' Type'B' Landscape Buffer 75' O.R.4703 PG.� - ---"F - - _ - - .2424 - —� R.O.W TAKE 75' SETBACK 20' rye 1 Athletic Fields LAKE 0' 1 Food Truck Landstap I Location Buffer 1 V HIGH W 1 ACK Ism I - m 1 25' Tea lB' Landscape LAKE I o w ' Buffer 3 within 75' Setback 1 l L' I 75 SETBACK R (0.26PRESA S!c I O.zs c.± i a Zoned: E Estates I LAKE in (Land Use is Single POTENTIAL FOOD J I TRUCK PARKING AREA LAND USE SUMMARY Family) ; J m m Acres Percentage io n m !� Zoned : E Estates Development Area 23.58 65.65% a ,o (Land Use is Vacant) I Landscape Buffersl Setback 5.07 14A 1 % - 25' Type'B' Landscape suffer w 1 Sports Fields 1.32 3.67 % 1 N within 75' Setback 75' SETBACK 1 1��-�i" Lake 5.69 15.81% "�`'� Zoned' F Estates 1 I Preserve Area 026 0.75 % U {Land Use is Single Family; 1 I ` Development Intensity per Sec. D of CFPUD Vacant) Total 35.92 100.00 % 1 I • Maximum total floor area = 90,000 s.f. —iIS- SETBACK 1 LAKE Minimum Open Space Required! Provided: Maximum Principal Structure Height 1 I 35.92 Acres X 30% = 10.78 Acres • Zoned height = 30 feet maximum 75SETBACK 1 • Actual height = 38 feet maximum for all structures 1 Preserves can be used to meet L.D.0 required landscape other than Worship Center buffer in accordance with Exhibit F, section 2.6 of the 1 I CFPUD. Worship Center Ire l Zoned height = 35 feet maximum I a m 1 Lakes shown are conceptual and may change during the • Actual height = 42 feet maximum m 1 SDP process. N c t Deviations 1 LAK I Minimum Native Vegetation Required/ Provided = 1.7 Acres x 15 Percent = 0.26 (pluslminus) Acres l • I See list of Requested Deviations 1 1 NOTES: All stacking shall occur within the development with no 20' Tppe�ET Landscape 1 Buffer within 75, Setback_ impacts on Oil Well Road for all uses. 3IST AVE. NE EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL •wa LUTHERAN CHURCH ;a„ �: HM F40LE MONTES wmatraem No.tm EXHIBIT C.F.P.u.D.MASTER PLAN -- - 6096CMP06 �4537-1 2006.096A 1 a I a Packet Pg. 1096 9.A.5.b EXHIBIT "D" LEGAL DESCRIPTION EMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMUNITY FACILITIES PUD CFPUD Property Description: I WMI -j -[I,, I h -1 1 IN 1.1 . ....... TRACT 65A. THE NORTH 165 FEET OF TRACTS 80 AND 81. THE SOUTH 165 FEET OF THE NORTH 330 FEET OF TRACTS 80 AND 81, THE NORTH 165 FEET OF THE SOUTH 330 FEET OF TRACTS 80 AND 81, THE SOUTH 165 FEET OF TRACTS 80 AND 81 AND ALL OF TRACTS 80A, 81A, 96, 96A, 97 AND 97 A, THE NORTH 1/2 OF TRACT 65, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, UNIT NO. 64, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7. PAGE(S) 64. PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. LESS AND EXCEPT THE NORTH 21.00 FEET THEREOF AND O.R. BOOK 4703, PAGE 2424-ROW TAKE. AND LOT 104, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, UNIT NO. 69 ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7 AT PAGE 65 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA. PROPERTY AREA 35.92 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. Page 12 of 15 Words underlined are additions; words struck through are deletions. H:\2006\2006096A\WP\CFPUD\1-18-2024\Emmanuel Lutheran Church Community Services CFPUD (PL20200002198) (1-18-2024).doc Packet Pg. 1097 9.A.5.b EXHIBIT "E" LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM THE LDC FOR THE EMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMUNITY FACILITIES PUD CFPUD Deviation No. 1 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02. H., Fences and Walls to not require a fence or wall along the west, south, and east property lines outside the boundary of the Athletic Field. Walls will be provided adjacent to the Athletic Field as depicted on the CFPUD Master Plan. This Section of the LDC requires that whenever a non-residential development lies contiguous to or opposite a residentially zoned district, said non-residential development shall provide a masonry wall or precast concrete wall or fence. Deviation No. 2 seeks relief from LDC Table 5.04.05 F.1. Temporary Event Time Limits, which limits sports, religious and community events to 28 event daYper calendar year to instead allow sports, religious, and community events for a maximum of 100 event days per calendar year. Page 13 of 15 Words underlined are additions; words struck through are deletions. H:\2006\2006096A\WP\CFPUD\1-18-2024\Emmanuel Lutheran Church Community Services CFPUD (PL20200002198) (1-18-2024).doc Packet Pg. 1098 9.A.5.b EXHIBIT "F" DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS FOR THE PROJECT EMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMUNITY FACILITIES PUD CFPUD 1. TRANSPORTATION A. For services and other periods and events of significant traffic generation, as determined by Collier County staff, the property owner shall provide traffic control by law enforcement or a law enforcement approved service provider as directed by Collier County staff, with staffing and at location(s) as directed by the Collier County Transportation Administrator or his designee. B. The maximum total dailv trip generation for the PUD shall not exceed 702 two- way AM peak hour trips and 455 two-way PM peak hour net trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application �for ' SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval. The development within thisr-o . eet shall l b limited a d J st A T 1, P J �r-vc�iizcccr-co 666�iuzrfcr�zc��$9-�'� •,�ccy�m� '. rrvirr-tFii9 a-n&o s23 unadjusted two way, lccsk hour- trips; -allowing f f exit a netwer-1, For- r r oses-of ealettlation of the weeka,,. AN4 and PM peak r trip ge neration for- this PUD, the lose,- of the weekday N4er- PN4 peak 1,eef tips as Generation,ealettlated in the institute of Tr-anspoAation Engineer's (ITE) RepoA, titled Trip generationor-etiffent Trip Generation Repot4 shall be utilized. 2. ENVIRONMENTAL A. Conservation/preservation areas comprising a minimum of 0.26 acres are shown on the CFPUD Master Plan that meets the minimum of 0.26± acres required to be preserved by the LDC. B. Preserves may be used to satisfy the landscape buffer requirements after exotic vegetation removal in accordance with LDC Sec. 4.06.02 and 4.06.05.E.1. Supplemental plantings with native plant materials shall be in accordance with LDC Section 3.05.07. Page 14 of 15 Words underlined are additions; words struck through are deletions. H:\2006\2006096A\WP\CFPUD\1-18-2024\Emmanuel Lutheran Church Community Services CFPUD (PL20200002198) (1-18-2024).doc Packet Pg. 1099 9.A.5.b 3. PUD MONITORING A. One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close-out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfvina all PUD commitments until close-out of the CFPUD. At the time of this PUD approval, the Managing Entity is Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples, Inc. should the Managing Entijy desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document, to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorne. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to the County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the CFPUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity will not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the CFPUD is closed out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments. B. Issuance of a development permit by a countv does not in anv wav create an rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law." (Section 125.022, FS) C. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development. 4. OTHER A. Mobile Food Dispensing Vehicles (MFDVs) shall be subject to the following conditions, limitations, and requirement: 1. A maximum of four MFDVs is permitted on site at any time; 2. MFDVs shall not be permanently located within this PUD, and shall be limited to the following hours of operation: Sunday through Thursday: 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM Friday and Saturday: 7:00 AM to 9:00 PM 3. MFDVs will comply with LDC Section 5.05.16. D, Requirements and standards for all MFDVs Vehicles. 4. As may be applicable, an Amendment or Insubstantial Change to the approved SDP shall be submitted, identifying the location of available restrooms, the area within which the MFDVs will be parked, and any patron seatingareas. reas. B. The proiect shall not have vehicular access to 31st Ave. NE. Page 15 of 15 Words underlined are additions; words struck through are deletions. H:\2006\2006096A\WP\CFPUD\1-18-2024\Emmanuel Lutheran Church Community Services CFPUD (PL20200002198) (1-18-2024).doc 0 a N a� M u, E O s L U c M d z J N c M E w o� N O 0 0 0 N O N J IL CO ti N Iq N 0 0 as c M c O 0 a CD N O Q. 0 a a r c as z 0 a as E M Q Packet Pg. 1100 N,,\A7-1014 75-7- cy %a �� Zp N M n, �10'0 aZM�Z� ORDINANCE NO. 11- 23 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF y COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY C", CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM THE ESTATES (E) ZONING DISTRICT TO A COMMUNITY FACILITIES PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (CFPUD) ..,-.. ZONING DISTRICT FOR THE PROJECT KNOWN AS EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH OF NAPLES, INC. CFPUD, TO ALLOW 90,000 SQUARE FEET OF USES TO INCLUDE WORSHIP/CHURCH AND RELATED SOCIAL SERVICES, A 300 PERSON CHILD AND ADULT DAY CARE FACILITY, JOB TRAINING AND VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION, A 450 PERSON PRIVATE SCHOOL; OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, DEVELOPMENT OF SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF OIL WELL ROAD, IN SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 21.72+/- ACRES SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. r_:� r-- it� WHEREAS, Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire of Coleman Yovanovich & Koester, P.A and Robert L. Duane, of Hole Montes, Inc., representing Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples, Inc., petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: The zoning classification of the real property more particularly described in Exhibit D, 9.A.5.c attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, located in Section 19, Township 48 South, Range 28 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from the Estates (E) Zoning District to a Community Facilities Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) Zoning District fora 21.72+/- acre Q Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church PUDZ-PL2009-2496 Page I oft Revised 6/24/ l 1 Packet Pg. 1101 9.A.5.c project known as Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples, Inc. CFPUD, subject to compliance with Exhibits A through F, attached hereto and incorporated herein and by reference made part hereof. The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps, as described in Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, is/are hereby amended accordingly. SECTION TWO: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super -majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this Q Vh day of , 5 U AAA , 2011. ATTEST: ; DWIGI- ,-. ,BR rCLERK By: w7 "Clerk N. Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: L+_- 7 . CA__�__ Steven T. Williams Assistant County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: `'IL4 W. FRED W. COYLE, Cha an Attachments: Exhibit A - Permitted Uses Exhibit B - Development Standards Exhibit C - Master Plan Exhibit D - Legal Description Exhibit E - Deviations from the LDC Exhibit F - Development Commitments C P' 10-CPS-01040`,41 Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church PUDZ-PL2009-2496 Page 2 of 2 Revised 6/24./1 1 'Ifi ni once iile� with �,''f��F}]ie�� cr�tary of 's Off i al day of , and acknowledgem that fil' ce'ved day o , Packet Pg. 1102 9.A.5.c EXHIBIT "A" LIST OF PERMITTED USES EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH COMMUNITY FACILITIES PUD No building or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: SIC GROUP No building or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: 1. Churches and Places of Worship 8661 2. Child Care Services 8351 Not for profit and operated with a church or place of worship 8351 permitted in this CFPUD 3. Private Schools 8211 Not for profit and operated with a church or place of worship 8243 permitted in this CFPUD (except boarding schools, and military 8244 academies). 8299 4. Social Services, individual and family (activity centers, elderly or handicapped only; day care centers, adult and handicapped only); must be not for profit and operated with a church or place of 8322 worship permitted in this CFPUD. 5. Job training and vocational rehabilitation services not for profit 8331 and operated with a church or place of worship permitted in this CFPUD. Vocational rehabilitation services shall not include uses such as outboard or diesel engine repair that could emit noise beyond the boundaries of the subject property. 6. Medical outreach to the community, to include activities such as administering influenza vaccine, checking blood pressure and conducting blood donation drives not for profit and operated with a church or place of worship permitted in this CFPUD. 7. Single family residential dwellings as an alternative to non- residential uses permitted in this CFPUD. (Also see Exhibit B — Development Intensity) 8. Any other principal and related use that is determined to be comparable to the foregoing by the Board of Zoning Appeals pursuant to the process outlined in the Land Development Code (LDC), however, soup kitchens and homeless shelters are prohibited. Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church PLTDZ-PL2009-2496 Last revised: 04-25-11 Page I of 10 Packet Pg. 1103 9.A.5.c B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses customarily associated with Permitted Principal Uses including but not limited to: 1. Recreational facilities including outdoor play areas and athletic field, administration offices and facilities, and youth recreation centers indoor to support church uses. 2. Water and wastewater facilities for serving this CFPUD only. Garden Plots, limited to an accessory use to the Churches and Places of Worship, SIC 8661. Garden Plots shall be allowed on an interim basis prior to the construction of the Churches and Places of Worship. Garden Plots are also an allowable Accessory Use after the construction of Churches and Places of Worship. 4. Any other accessory use and related use that is determined to be comparable to the foregoing by the Board of Zoning Appeals, pursuant to the process outlined in the Land Development Code (LDC). C. Preserve Area Uses: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for the preserve area depicted on the CFPUD Master Plan other than the following: 1. Passive recreation areas such as pervious nature trails or boardwalks are allowed in the preserve area, as long as any clearing required to facilitate these uses does not impact the minimum required area to be preserved. 2. Any other conservation related use that is determined to be comparable to the foregoing by the Board of Zoning Appeals, pursuant to the process outlined in the Land Development Code (LDC). Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church PUDZ-PL2009-2496 Last revised: 04-25-11 Page 2 of 10 Packet Pg. 1104 9.A.5.c EXHIBIT "B" DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH COMMUNITY FACILITIES PUD Development of the EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH COMMUNITY FACILITIES PUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this Ordinance and applicable sections of the LDC and Growth Management Plan (GMP) in effect at the time of issuance of any development order, such as, but not limited to, final subdivision plat, final site development plan, excavation permit, and preliminary work authorization, to which such regulations relate. Where these regulations fail to provide developmental standards, then the provisions of the most similar district, the Community Facility District (CF) of the LDC shall apply. Table I below sets forth the development standards for land uses within the PUD. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or subdivision plat. TABLE I COMMUNITY FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS A. PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES MINIMUM LOT AREA MINIMUM LOT WIDTH MINIMUM FLOOR AREA PERIMETER SETBACKS MINIMUM FRONT YARD MINIMUM SIDE YARD MINIMUM REAR YARD MINIMUM PRESERVE SETBACK MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES N/A N/A N/A 75 feet east property line 75 feet west and southwest property line 75 feet south property line 75 feet north property line 25 feet 25 feet or perimeter setback whichever is greater 25 feet or perimeter setback whichever is greater 25 feet '/z building zoned height (BH) Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church PUDZ-PL2009-2496 Last revised: 04-25-11 Page 3 of 10 Packet Pg. 1105 9.A.5.c MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT 2 stories not to exceed 30 feet zoned building height or 38 feet actual building height; however, the Worship Center shall not exceed a zoned height of 35 feet and an actual height of 42 feet. B. ACCESSORY STRUCTURES FRONT SETBACK 25 feet (see *Note 1) SIDE SETBACK 10 feet or perimeter setback whichever is greater REAR SETBACK 10 feet or perimeter setback whichever is greater PRESERVE SETBACK 10 feet or perimeter setback whichever is greater PERIMETER SETBACK 75 feet MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN ACCESSORY STRUCTURES 10 feet MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT NOT TO EXCEED 1 story, not to exceed 25 feet zoned building height and 30 feet actual BH *Note 1 Athletic field is permitted in setback area including portion of the existing lake as shown on CFPUD Master Plan; C. STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL USE Residential uses in accordance with the Estates District if non-residential uses are not developed on the subject property. D. DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY 1. A maximum of 90,000 S.F. of total floor area is allowed in this Community Facilities PUD and the number of seats for the Worship Center shall not exceed 1,000 seats. 2. Maximum number of school students is 450. 3. Maximum number of Day Care Center participants is 300. 4. In lieu of permitted community facilities allowed by this CPUD, ten (10) single family dwelling units are permitted. r a Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church PUDZ-PL2009-2496 Last revised: 04-25-11 Page 4 of 10 Packet Pg. 1106 9.A.5.c E. LANDSCAPING 1. Seventy five foot (75') wide buffer areas are required along the east, west and southwest property lines abutting residential development as shown on the CFPUD Master Plan. However, play fields are permitted in a portion of the 75 foot wide buffer area shown on the west and southwest property lines along with an existing lake. 2. A twenty five foot (20') wide Type "D" buffer is required along Oil Well Road and twenty-five foot (25') wide Type "B" buffers are required along the east, west and southwest south property lines as shown on the CFPUD Master Plan. F. LIGHTING (Per Policy 5.1.1 of the Golden Gate Master Plan set forth below): Consistent with public safety requirements, street, recreational and structure lighting shall be placed, constructed and maintained in such manner as to prevent or reduce light pollution. The following standards shall apply: a. If a streetlight or an area light is required, it shall be of the type specified to protect neighboring properties from direct glare. Area lighting shall be shielded such that direct rays do not pass property lines. Low-pressure sodium lamps are encouraged while halogen type lights are discouraged. Where required, the street lamp shall be of the high pressure sodium type and have a "cobra head with flat bottom" style or be fully shielded so that light is directed only downward. Street lamps shall be mounted on a wood pole at a height and wattage recommended by the appropriate electric utility and as appropriate for a rural area. 2. Parking lot lamps shall be low-pressure sodium type lamps and shall be mounted so that they point downward without direct rays extending past the parking lot, building entrance, walkway, or other area intended to be illuminated. b. Where lighting of recreational areas is required, such lighting shall be mounted so as to focus illumination on the areas intended to be illuminated, and to limit the amount of light that extends outside of the intended area. C. All lighting associated with the Athletic Field shall be turned off no later than 9:30 P.M. G. ATHLETIC FIELD OPERATION 1. The Athletic Field shall only be permitted to be in use between the hours of 7:00 E A.M. and 9:00 P.M. r a Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church PUDZ-PL2009-2496 Last revised: 04-25-11 Page 5 of 10 Packet Pg. 1107 9.A.5.c H. GARDEN PLOTS 1. U-Pick or on -site sales of produce is prohibited. 2. The maximum area for the garden plots shall be limited to 10% of property or f2 acres. 3. Garden plots shall be located outside the 75 foot perimeter setback areas. 4. Maximum number of automobiles shall be limited to ten at any one time. 5. Access to garden plots and parking areas shall be a gravel surface. 6. Temporary sanitary facility to be provided. 7. A Site Improvement Plan shall be required to be approved by the County prior to the utilization of garden plots. 8. The development of garden plots shall not vest the property for PUD sunsetting purposes. I. WALLS 1. A six-foot high wall shall be constructed as shown on the CFPUD Master Plan adjacent to residential development. The wall shall be constructed prior to the utilization of the Athletic Field. Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church PUDZ-PL2009-24% Last revised: 04-25-11 Page 6 of 10 Packet Pg. 1108 9.A.5.c — — �- -- -{2W WIW True U' —_ Praros.d_iy wis. CanpfruatYlga.O.W. __ — --� _+ IaM--Pe kokr..- f.. isar Tum-iane) T UMN ,I_ 1 :s 25' wde Type 7' undfope buff. � 1 e wa w. .. The Intercaunectiau taw aNy Lx p—rided If kypfy 0e- Wig and If the C.F.P.U.D. is din. with principal refiderefN urs LAND USE SUMMARY Acres Percentage Buildings 2.07 9.53 % Utikty Structures 0.18 0.93% Asphalt Pavement 3.75 17.27 % Future Parkes/ Pvmt. 1.00 4.60 % Sdewaft 1.00 4.60 % # Lake 3.09 14.23 % # Preserve Area 0.26 1.19 % # Recreation/ Sodded/ 10.37 47.75 % Landscape Areas Taal 21.72 100.00 % Required Open Space — 21.72 Acres x 30 % = 6.52 Acres Total Open Space = 13.72 Acres 63.17 % (# Includes lake, Preserve, Recreation, Sodded and Landscaped Areas) The Total Open Space proposed is well in excess of 30%, land use areas are conceptual In nature and sub)ect to final design considerations. Required Existing Native Vegetation to be Retained = 1.7 Acres x 0.15 = 0.26 Acres Retained Existing Native Vegetation - 0.26 Acres S Maximum total floor area • 90,000 s.f. •Maximum Principal Structure Height Zoned height a 30 het maximum • Actual height = 38 het maximum forall structures other than Worship Center Worship Center • Zoned height : 3S het mind in • Actual height . 42 het maximum EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH Gran Parkaie Am Propafed like 0.92 Act Stormwater ewwrifrrinlc Area 3.09 KS Hdrthla Uke 247 Ac.d II 1 1 1 1 Ii i I I I I I I 1 I I I I� I' I I I I I� 1 1 I I I I I 1 I 1 1 I I I I i I -- - ------ ----- ------------ 20' Wide Type 7 Undtcape_ BlrRfr 25'WWe Setaafk Leefarr. _ — Grass Parsing Area _I '__________________ ;. Grwar I Deeiati0a ft 1 AdmYr6tratlre 20,0110 S.F. I olOff—N0 a Perime5.t0er3.02.E.Wak per I M yea Sectlpn2 I Ip 15.000 S.F. L t� Mid ark Mull I • Edwatbn I c FaWky C—n-U y F.H.-hip 25.000 S.F. CM- 30.000 S.F. I 1 1 I 1 Water Arya Fa WaRewabr I I rreabrYrx Tnixi,, t Ddk nkW x i �•� F—hued Utxky S-Am 1. w ..day af.aahla I I b rou suu I EWIH Nathe Vyefaaan Retakwd (0.26 A-) t�r`rs Grua v.rkH Area — — — - II 25 wide True 11Urdsiape boner I within 75'wWe satWca )!'sila.ta fumy �— ZMW: E Estate 1 Lard Uri is Singh= Fwr* and Vacnx) l-^-'ftlon No. 1 1b PeMletw waa l Px section a 5.03A2.E.2 e6L NF Nepa, e110 341„ EXHIBIT C Pllprr: l2xa)23e-2000 Fbda CMYMansa C.F.P.U.D. MASTER PLAN B� M .-MaNDl Na.1772 6O960APO6 4637-1 cal - enr 2006.096 1 1 or 1 Packet Pg. 1109 9.A.5.c EXHIBIT "D" LEGAL DESCRIPTION EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH COMMUNITY FACILITIES PUD Property Description: Tract 65A, the North 165 feet of Tracts 80 and 81, the South 165 feet of the North 330 feet of Tracts 80 and 81, the North 165 feet of the South 330 feet of Tracts 80 and 81, the South 165 feet of Tracts 80 and 81, and all of Tracts 80A, 81 A, 96 and 96A, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, UNIT NO. 64, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 7, Page(s) 64, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church PUDZ-PL2009-24% Last revised: 04-25-1 1 Page 8 of 10 Packet Pg. 1110 9.A.5.c EXHIBIT "E" LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM THE LDC FOR THE EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH COMMUNITY FACILITIES PUD Deviation No. 1 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02. H., Fences and Walls to not require a fence or wall along the west, south, and east property lines outside the boundary of the Athletic Field. Walls will be provided adjacent to the Athletic Field as depicted on the CFPUD Master Plan. This Section of the LDC requires that whenever a non-residential development lies contiguous to or opposite a residentially zoned district, said non-residential development shall provide a masonry wall or precast concrete wall or fence. Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church PUDZ-PL2009-2496 Last revised: 04-25-11 Page 9 of 10 Packet Pg. 1111 9.A.5.c EXHIBIT °`F" DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS FOR THE PROJECT EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH COMMUNITY FACILITIES PUD 1. TRANSPORTATION A. For services and other periods and events of significant traffic generation, as determined by Collier County staff, the property owner shall provide traffic control by law enforcement or a law enforcement approved service provider as directed by Collier County staff, with staffing and at location(s) as directed by the Collier County Transportation Administrator or his designee. B. The development within this project shall be limited to 666 unadjusted two-way, AM peak hour trips and/or 323 unadjusted two-way, PM peak hour trips; allowing for flexibility in the proposed uses without creating unforeseen impacts on the adjacent roadway network. For purposes of calculation of the weekday AM and PM peak hour trip generation for this PUD, the lesser of the weekday AM or PM peak hour trips as calculated in the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Report, titled Trip Generation, 8th Edition or the trip generation as calculated in the then current ITE Trip Generation Report shall be utilized. C. A potential for interconnection with the residential properties to the west shall be provided if the subject property develops only with single family uses and the conditions for the use of the interconnection are acceptable to the developer and the residential properties to the west. If the subject property is developed without residential uses within four years of the date of adoption, then this commitment shall no longer be deemed applicable. 2. ENVIRONMENTAL A. Conservation/preservation areas comprising a minimum of 0.26 acres are shown on the CFPUD Master Plan that meets the minimum of 0.26t acres required to be preserved by the LDC. B. As part of the first development order application (SDP, Plat or other), the applicant shall provide an updated listed species survey to show the property's proximity to bear or panther habitat (primary or secondary) and indicate if any mitigation is required by the FWC/USFWS. If mitigation is required, the applicant shall coordinate said mitigation with County Environmental Staff members. Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church PUDZ-PL2009-2496 Last revised: 04-25-1 1 Page 10 of 10 Packet Pg. 1112 9.A.5.c STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) I, DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk of Courts in and for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of: ORDINANCE 2011-23 Which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on the 28th day of June, 2011, during Regular Session. WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 30th day of June, 2011. DWIGHT E. BROCK Clerk of Courts and Clerk Ex -of f icio `to ' Board of County CQmmissio vr-�q • ,�, y : An n - ohi Deputy. CI♦e.',-`'k• Y 4 Packet Pg. 1113 9.A.5.d HEX NO.2015 — 49 HEARING EXAMINER DECISION PETITION NO. PDI-PL20150000262 - Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples, Inc. requests an insubstantial change to Ordinance No. 11-23, the Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples, Inc. CFPUD, as amended, to add temporary sports, religious, and community events, and temporary seasonal sales as permitted accessory uses, to allow the permitted athletic field as an interim accessory use prior to construction of a permitted principal use, to add development standards for the athletic field interim accessory use, to revise development standards for garden plots by removing the prohibition on on -site sales of produce and maximum number of automobiles, and to delete an environmental development commitment. The subject property consists of 21.72f acres located on the south side of Oil Well Road, approximately one quarter mile west of Everglades Blvd. in Section 19, Township 48 South, Range 28 East, Collier County, Florida. DATE OF HEARING: December 10, 2015 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval. FINDINGS: Based on the applicant's written petition, testimony at the hearing of the applicant and the recommendation of staff, the Hearing Examiner finds that the criteria set forth in Sections 10.02.13 E.1 and 10.02.13 E.2 of the Land Development Code has been met and the petition is approved. ANALYSIS: No members of the public were in attendance and staff has received no objections. Seven members of the public attended the neighborhood information meeting with no objections noted. After review of the original submittal, several items of clarifications were agreed to by the applicant and are incorporated within the attached Exhibit A. DECISION: The Hearing Examiner hereby approves Petition Number PDI-PL20150000262, filed by Robert J. Mulhere of Hole Montes, Inc. representing Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples, Inc., with respect to the property as described in the Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples, Inc. CFPUD, Ordinance No. 11-23, for the following insubstantial changes: • to add temporary sports, religious, and community events, and temporary seasonal sales as accessory uses that shall be allowed prior to the construction of the principal use ; • to allow the athletic field as an interim accessory use prior to construction of a permitted principal use; • to add development standards for the athletic field interim accessory use; [I 5-CPS-0 1439/1227925/1]36 1 of 2 Packet Pg. 1114 9.A.5.d • to revise development standards for garden plots by removing the prohibition on on -site sales of produce and maximum number of automobiles; and • to remove an environmental development commitment that has been satisfied. Said changes are fully described in the Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples, Inc. CFPUD amendment attached as Exhibit "A", and are subject to the condition(s) set forth below. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A — CFPUD Amendment LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Ordinance No. 11-23, the Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples, Inc. CFPUD. CONDITIONS: 1. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development. DISCLAIMER: Pursuant to Section 125.022(5) F.S., issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. APPEALS: This decision becomes effective on the date it is rendered. Pursuant to Ordinance 2013-25, as amended, a Hearing Examiner Decision may be appealed to the Board of County Commissioners or the Board of Zoning Appeals, as appropriate. Appeals must be filed within 30 days of the date the Hearing Examiner Decision is rendered. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AND EXHIBITS: SEE CLERK OF COURT, MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. DECISIONS OF THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR VARIANCES, CONDITIONAL USES, AND BOAT DOCK EXTENSIONS SHALL BE NOTED ON THE ZONING MAP FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES. i Date Mar Strain, Hearing Examiner Approk d le ality: Scott A..Stone Assistant County Attorney [ 15-CPS-01439/1227925/1 ]36 2 of 2 Packet Pg. 1115 9.A.5.d SECTION ONE: AMENDMENT TO EXHIBIT "A", LIST ORDINANCE NO. 11-23, EMMANUEL COMMUNITY FACILITIES PUD EXHIBIT "A" Page 1 of 4 OF PERMITTED USES, ATTACHED TO EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH Exhibit "A," List of Permitted Uses, Section B, Accessory Uses, attached to Ordinance No. 11-23, Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church Community Facilities PUD, is hereby amended to read as follows: B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses customarily associated with Permitted Principal Uses including but not limited to: Recreational facilities including outdoor play areas and athletic field, administration offices and facilities, and youth recreation centers indoor to support church uses. The athletic field, limited to the location as depicted on the PUD Master Plan as "Football/Soccer Field" and "Softball Field," shall be allowed on an interim basis, prior to the construction of a principal use as listed in paragraph A. of Exhibit A of the PUD. Additionally, sports, religious, and community events (e.g. open air farmers market) are already_ permitted on the subject property, subject to the issuance of a Temporary Use Permit as set forth in LDC Section 5.04.05. The sum total duration of all such special events shall not exceed 28 days per calendar Year. Temporary seasonal sales (e.g. pumpkin or Christmas tree sales) are also permitted, subject to the issuance of a Temporary Use Permit as set forth in LDC Section 5.04.05 and the time limitation contained therein. These events are allowed prior to the construction of a principal use. Water and wastewater facilities €el=serving this CFPUD only. 3. Garden Plots, limited to an accessory use to the Churches and Places of Worship, SIC 8661. Garden Plots shall be allowed on an interim basis prior to the construction of the Churches and Places of Worship. Garden Plots are also an allowable Accessory Use after the construction of Churches and Places of Worship. 4. Any other accessory use and related use that is determined to be comparable to the foregoing by the Board of Zoning Appeals, pursuant to the process outlined in the Land Development Code (LDC). Page 1 of 4 Words underlined are added; words Stftiek threugh are deletions HA2006\2006096\WP\PDl 2015\HEX\Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church CFPUD 1`131(PL-20150000262) (12-10-2015).docx Packet Pg. 1116 9.A.5.d EXHIBIT "A" Page 2 of 4 SECTION TWO: AMENDMENT TO EXHIBIT "B", DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, ATTACHED TO ORDINANCE NO. 11-23, EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH COMMUNITY FACILITIES PUD Exhibit "B," Development Standards, attached to Ordinance No. 11-23, Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church Community Facilities PUD, is hereby amended to read as follows: G. ATHLETIC FIELD OPERATION The Athletic Field shall only be permitted to be in use between the hours of 7:00 A.M. and 9:00 P.M. 2. If constructed as an interim accessory use, prior to the construction of a principal use, the following standards shall apply: a. The athletic field will only be used during daylight hours and will not be lighted, until such time as a principal use is constructed. b. Temporary sanitary facilities that are ADA accessible shall be provided. c. Use of the athletic field shall be limited to members of the congregation and their guests. d. Up to two (2) on -premises directional signs are allowed. Each sign shall not exceed six (6) square feet in size. e. The authorization for such use shall be valid for five (5) years. If the principal use has not commenced by that time, staff may authorize the continuation of the interim accessory use for another five (5) years. In approving the continuation of the athletic fields as an interim accessory use, the County will evaluate any changes in impacts to adjacent roadways or neighboring properties to determine whether the five-year extension should be granted administratively or brought back before the Hearing Examiner. f. Traffic control for peak events will be provided by the owner if it is determined to be warranted by the Collier County Growth Mana ement Division or the Collier County Sheriff's Office. H. GARDEN PLOTS 1. U-Pick or similar commercial farm operation is prohibited. Page 2 of 4 Words underlined are added; words stfuek through are deletions H:\2006\2006096\WP\PDI 2015\HEX\Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church CFPUD PDI (PL-20150000262) (12-10-2015).docx Packet Pg. 1117 9.A.5.d EXHIBIT "A" Page 3 of 4 2. The maximum area for the garden plots shall be limited to 10% of property or ±2 acres. 3. Garden plots shall be located outside the 75 foot perimeter setback areas. 4. Mffldmufn number- ef atiteniebiles shall be limited te ten at any one time. -5-A. Access to garden plots and parking areas shall be a gravel surface. 6-.L. Temporary sanitary f6eilit),-to facilities shall be provided. �6. A Site Improvement Plan shall be required to be approved by the County prior to the utilization of garden plots. Page 3 of 4 Words underlined are added; words smzck ""uethrough are deletions H:\2006\2006096\WP\PDI 2015\HEX\Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church CFPUD PDI (PL-20150000262) (12-10-2015).docx Packet Pg. 1118 9.A.5.d EXHIBIT "A" Page 4 of 4 SECTION THREE: AMENDMENT TO EXHIBIT "F", DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS FOR THE PROJECT, ATTACHED TO ORDINANCE NO. 11-23, EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH COMMUNITY FACILITIES PUD Exhibit "F," Development Commitments for the Project, attached to Ordinance No. 1I- 23, Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church Community Facilities PUD, is hereby amended to read as follows: 2. ENVIRONMENTAL A. Conservation/preservation areas comprising a minimum of 0.26 acres are shown on the CFPUD Master Plan that meets the minimum of 0.26t acres required to be preserved by the LDC. .. . ON 51W Page 4 of 4 Words underlined are added; words stmek thFough are deletions H:\2006\2006096\WP\PDI 2015\HEX\Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church CFPUD PDI (PL-20150000262) (12-10-2015).docx Packet Pg. 1119 9.A.5.e �ov�.yt�ty GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT To: From: Date: ZONING DIVISION CONSISTENCY REVIEW MEMORANDUM Nancy Gundlach, ASLA, AICP, Planner III, Zoning Services Section Kathy Eastley, AICP, Planner III, Comprehensive Planning Section January 31, 2024 Subject: Golden Gate Area Master Plan Consistency Review PETITION NUMBER: PUDA-PL20200002198 PETITION NAME: Emmanuel Lutheran Church Community Services CFPUD Amendment REQUEST: Amend the existing Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran CFPUD (including a name change to the Emmanuel Lutheran Church Community Services CFPUD), approved by Ordinance 2011-23, to amend the existing uses, add uses, and expand the CFPUD boundary. The existing ±21.72 acre CFPUD is proposed to increase by approximately 14.2 acres, for a total of 35.92 acres. Other changes to the CFPUD include: • Elimination of the existing requirement that Child Care Services, Private and Public Schools, and Medical Outreach Use be non-profit and affiliated with a church. • Elimination of a requirement for church affiliation for Individual and Family Social Services. • Addition of the following uses: o Non-profit Colleges and Universities. o Expanding the Medical Outreach Use to include Medical/Health Clinic uses. o Non -Profit Job Training and Rehabilitation Services. o Non -Profit Physical Fitness Facilities, affiliated with a church. o Essential Services. o United States Post Office. o Interim Agricultural Activities. o Food Trucks, maximum of four. o Garden Plots. o Recreational Facilities. LOCATION: The subject site is on the south side of Oil Well Road, approximately .5 miles west of Orange Blossom Ranch and 1,000 feet west of Everglades Boulevard in Section 19, Township 48 South, Range 28 East, Collier County, Florida. The site is within the 8 - Rural Estates Planning Community. Packet Pg. 1120 9.A.5.e Emmanuel Lutheran Church CFPUDA Consistency Review Memo 1-31-2024 BACKGROUND: As shown on the map above, the proposed expanded area of the CFPUD is highlighted in yellow, with the existing project area outlined in red. The legal description for the CFPUD will consist of multiple Tracts within Golden Gate Estates, Unit 64. The proposed inclusion area consists of four parcels, three of which are located on the eastern edge of the CFPUD and are vacant, and one parcel, described as the North Half of Tract 65, which is located at the western edge of the CFPUD and consists of an existing single-family home. These parcels are zoned Estates (E). COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMENTS: The 21.72-acre existing CFPUD area is designated by the Golden Gate Area Master Plan as Estates — Mixed Use District, Mission Subdistrict and was created by Ordinance 2010-31 and is included on the Rural Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map. The Subdistrict text states that "The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide for churches and related uses, including community outreach." A history of the development of the subdistrict over the past 14 years is provided below: • 2012 - A Site Improvement Plan was approved by PL20120002169 for a Community Garden. • 2015 - A Planned Unit Development Insubstantial Change (PUDI) was approved by the Collier County Hearing Examiner to add temporary sports, religious, and community events, and temporary seasonal sales as permitted accessory uses, to allow the permitted athletic field as interim accessory use prior to construction of a permitted principal use. • 2015 — Site Development Plan for Recreation Fields/Special Events (PL20150000268). • 2017 — Excavation Permit to reconfigure an existing lake (PL20170000507). • 2017 — Irrigation System (PRPL20171038225). • 2018 — Six-foot Wall (PRBD20180638952) for the athletic field. • 2019 — 2020 — Three Temporary Use Permits issued for Farmer's Market. • 2020 - Site Development Plan for a Shade Structure (PL20200002369). • 2020 — GMPA and PUDA submitted. Meals of Hope currently operates a mobile food pantry on the site, providing food every Wednesday from 12:30 to 4:00. Outdoor church services occur on site on Sundays. Packet Pg. 1121 9.A.5.e Emmanuel Lutheran Church CFPUDA Consistency Review Memo 1-31-2024 Google Maps Photo, dated April 2023 The Growth Management Plan designation of the proposed inclusion parcels is Estates - Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict as identified on Rural Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map in the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). The Estates "...designation is characterized by low density semi -rural residential lots with limited opportunities for other land uses." The GGAMP further provides that the designation can accommodate future non-residential uses through conditional uses and neighborhood centers. The Residential Estates Subdistrict allows single-family residential development with a maximum density of one unit per 2.25 gross acres or one unit per legal non -confirming lot of record. The rezoning proposal is not consistent with the GGAMP, and therefore, the companion GMPA petition has been submitted to amend the existing Mission Subdistrict to increase the size to 35.92 acres, allow the proposed uses included in the CFPUD, as well as to rename the Subdistrict to Emmanuel Lutheran Church Community Facilities and Services Subdistrict. Specifically, the Subdistrict would allow the Community Facility uses, pursuant to the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) as well as a commercial Food Truck Park and Medical Offices/Clinics that do not fall within the Community Facility uses included in the LDC. The existing CFPUD includes seventy -five-foot perimeter buffers as recommended in the GGAMP between residential and non-residential uses. The buffer requirement is proposed to be retained in the CFPUD and will be applied to the perimeter parcels. These buffers are also proposed to be included in the revised Subdistrict language. The maximum development within the Subdistrict is capped at 90,000 square feet and is not proposed to increase with the inclusion of additional land into the Subdistrict. Staff has identified several issues with the proposed amendments to the CFPUD and Subdistrict: Commercial Uses The proposed additional uses within the Subdistrict and CFPUD include Food Trucks and Medical Offices. Packet Pg. 1122 9.A.5.e Emmanuel Lutheran Church CFPUDA Consistency Review Memo 1-31-2024 The CFPUD includes allowance for up to four food trucks to set up on -site seven days a week and operate from 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Sunday to Thursday, and 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. Friday and Saturday. The CFPUD proposes to include those standards associated with the LDC amendments for Mobile Food Vending uses. Non-profit Medical Office is also a proposed use that is not considered a Community Facility use. Section 2.03.05, Civic and Institutional Zoning Districts, Subsection B. Community Facility (CF) states: "The purpose and intent of (CF) district is to implement the GMP by permitting nonresidential land uses as generally identified in the urban designation of the future land use element. These uses can be characterized as public facilities, institutional uses, open space uses, recreational uses, water -related or dependent uses, and other such uses generally serving the community at large." Needs Analysis The GMPA petition did not include a needs analysis for the proposed uses at this location. The original submittal for the CFPUD and Subdistrict did not support the need for these uses at this site with data and analysis and given the lack of development, the need may be premature or misplaced. The applicant's justification for the Food Truck use is "that the food trucks will complement the vision of the Subdistrict of establishing a sense of community and providing a public space for community engagement." Interim Facilities Agreement The lack of water and sewer infrastructure in the area will require that the project construct on -site interim water and wastewater facilities to serve the proposed uses. Public Utilities require an agreement in which the property owner will be required to obtain public infrastructure within 2 years once that infrastructure is available within 200 feet of the site. Staff is concerned that the 90,000 square feet of development will not be served by public facilities, as the timing for the extension of these services is currently unknown. This may be an indication that the proposed development is premature as adequate facilities are not currently available to serve the project. In reviewing for compliance with Policy 5.6 and Policies 7.1 - 7.4 (shown below) of the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) staff provides the following analysis in [bracketed bold text.] Policy 5.6: New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code (Ordinance 04-41, adopted June 22, 2004 and effective October 18, 2004, as amended). [Comprehensive Planning leaves this determination to Zoning staff as part of their review of the petition in its entirety. However, staff would note that in reviewing the appropriateness of the requested uses/intensities on the subject site, the compatibility analysis might include a review of both the subject proposal and surrounding or nearby properties as to allowed use intensities and densities, development standards (building heights, setbacks, landscape buffers, etc.), building mass, building location, traffic generation/attraction, etc.] Packet Pg. 1123 9.A.5.e Emmanuel Lutheran Church CFPUDA Consistency Review Memo 1-31-2024 Policy 7.1: The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. [The subject site currently includes one access point on Oil Well Road, a minor arterial roadway as identified in the Transportation Element. A second access point is shown at the east end of the project onto Oil Well Road. No access is proposed to 3111 Avenue NE.] Policy 7.2: The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals. [The PUD Master Plan does not depict the proposed on -site circulation; however, the two proposed access points for the project would necessitate adequate on -site circulation for ingress and egress.] Policy 7.3: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and their interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. [The PUD Master Plan does not include interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods. The adjacent properties are both developed and undeveloped Estates (E) parcels. The Subdistrict is mid -block between Everglades Boulevard on the east and a canal and Orange Blossom Ranch on the west.] Policy 7.4: The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities, and a range of housing prices and types. [This policy primarily pertains to residential development so is largely not applicable. However, staff notes the proposed development is adjacent to existing sidewalks (along Oil Well Road).] CONCLUSION: The rezoning petition is not consistent with the GGAMP. A companion Small Scale GMPA petition (PL20200002204) proposes to expand and rename the Mission Subdistrict, and to allow for up to 90,000 square feet of community facilities and commercial uses, including food trucks and medical offices. Staff does not support the proposed food truck and medical office commercial uses and therefore recommends that the GMPA include only those uses that are considered Community Facility uses by the LDC. Staff supports the following CF uses: • Churches and Places of Worship. • Child Care Services. • Public and Private Schools. • Colleges and Universities. • Social Services. • Job Training and Vocational Rehabilitation. • Medical Outreach, which includes administering vaccines and conducting blood donation. • Physical Fitness Facilities (such as a YMCA). • Essential Services. • United States Postal Center (except major distribution). 5 Packet Pg. 1124 9.A.5.e Emmanuel Lutheran Church CFPUDA Consistency Review Memo 1-31-2024 Based on the above analysis, if the GMPA is approved with the proposed commercial and community facility uses and becomes effective, the proposed CPUD may be deemed consistent with the GMP. PETITION ON CITYVIEW Packet Pg. 1125 9.A.5.f NIM SUMMARY Mission Subdistrict GMPA (PL-20200002204) Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples CFPUDA (PL-20200002198) Monday, August 14 at 5:30 p.m. Collier County UFAFAS Extension, Multi -Purpose Room 14700 Immokalee Road, Naples, FL 34120 The NIM was held for the above referenced petitions. The petitions are described as follows: 1) Mission Subdistrict GMPA (PL-20200002204) A Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) to amend the Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Map to add 14.181:L acres to the existing Mission Subdistrict, for a total size of 36f. The existing subdistrict allows for a maximum of 90,000 square feet of uses, including a church, childcare services, and a private school. The proposed GMPA retains the maximum 90,000 square foot limitation, and the permitted church, childcare service, and private school uses. The GMPA also proposes to add additional community services, including a maximum of four food trucks, medical office, social services, post -secondary education, and essential and other community -oriented services; and (2) Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples Community Facilities Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) Amendment (PL-20200002198) An amendment to add 14.18± acres to the PUD and allow additional community services within the PUD. The approved PUD allows for a maximum of 90,000 square feet of uses, including a 1,000-seat church, childcare services with a maximum of 300 attendees, and a private school with a maximum of 450 students. The proposed PUD amendment retains the maximum 90,000 square foot limitation, maximum of 1,000 church seats, and maximum of 450 private school students; but reduces the childcare enrollment from 300 to a maximum of 200 attendees. The PUD Amendment also proposes to add additional community services, including a maximum of four food trucks, medical office, social services, post -secondary education, and essential and other community -oriented services. Note: This is a summary of the NIM. An audio and video recording are also provided. Attendees On behalf of Applicants: Howard Issacson, Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples, Inc. (Applicant) Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, President/CEO, Hole Montes, a Bowman Company Richard Yovanovich, Esq., Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. Norman Trebilcocic, AICP, PTOE, PE, Trebilcocic Consulting Solutions, PA Terry Cole, PE, Hole Montes, a Bowman Company Jeremie Chastain, AICP, Planner III, Hole Montes, a Bowman Company County Staff: Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA, CSM, Planner III, Zoning Services Katherine Eastly, AICP, Planner III, Comprehensive Planning Four members of the public attended. Two members of the public attended via Zoom. Page 1 of 2 HA2006\2006096A\WP\CFPUD\NIM #2\NIM Summary (8-15-2023).docx Packet Pg. 1126 9.A.5.f Mr. Mulhere started the presentation by introducing himself, the property owner, the other consultants, and county staff. He explained the NIM process, the process for approval, and provided a brief history of the project. The following comments/questions were raised by the members of the public in attendance: Misc. There were questions asked about the proposed access to the property. Mr. Mulhere explained that initially access was proposed to 3 l st Ave. NE, but that access was removed after feedback received from the public. Mr. Mulhere agreed to include a condition there will be no access to 31 St Ave. NE in the PUD document. Per County standards, there is a second access point proposed to Oil Well Road. The meeting concluded at approximately 5:45 PM. Page 2 of 2 H:\2006\2006096A\WP\CFPUD\NIM #2\NIM Summary (8-15-2023).docx Packet Pg. 1127 9.A.5.f Neighborhood Meeting Summary Mission Subdistrict GMPA (PL-20200002204) Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples CFPUDA (PL-20200002198) September 30, 2021, 5:30 PM Collier County UF/IFAS Extension, Multi -Purpose Room 14700 Immokalee Road, Naples, FL 34120 The NIM was held for the above referenced petitions. The petitions are described as follows: 1. Mission Subdistrict GMPA (PL-20200002204) A Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) to amend the future land use subdistrict of Mission Subdistrict to add approx. 14 acres to the existing Subdistrict and to allow church -related uses on the additional acreage; and 2. Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples Community Facilities Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) Amendment (PL-20200002198) An amendment to add approx. 14 acres to the PUD and allow church -related uses on the additional acreage. The approved PUD allows for 90,000 square feet of uses, including a 1,000-seat church and related social services; a 300-person daycare, and private school. The PUD amendment would allow for the sane square footage and number of church seats, reduce the daycare to 200, and add not -for -profit community services including medical office, social services, and post -secondary education, plus essential and other services. Note: This is a summary of the NIM. An audio recording is also provided. Applicant: Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples, Inc. Attendees: On Behalf of the Applicant: Howard Isaacson, Emmanuel Communities, Inc. & Emmanuel Academies, Inc., Chief Executive Officer Rev. Will Kittinger, Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples, Inc., Associate Pastor Paula McMichael, AICP, Hole Montes, Inc. Richard Yovanovich, Esq., Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. Norman Trebilcock, AICP, PTOE, PE, Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Six members of the public attended. Ms. McMichael started the presentation by introducing herself and the other consultants. She then provided a brief history and overview of the project, and the process for approval. Following Ms. McMichael's presentation there was approximately twenty minutes of questions. Page 1 of 2 H:\2006\2006096A\WP\CFPUD\NIM\NIM Summary (10-4-2021).docx Packet Pg. 1128 9.A.5.f The following issues were raised: Access Concerns were raised regarding the proposed access point to SW 31St Ave. NE. The main access to the proposed development will be via Oil Well Rd.; however, we understand the public's concern and the applicant will review the proposed access to SW 31St Ave. NE. Intensity Questions were asked regarding the maximum total floor area allowed in the CFPUD. Although proposed amendment is adding acreage to the existing CFPUD, there are no changes proposed to the previously approved maximum of 90,000 square feet of total floor area, to the previously approved building height (two stories/ 30'), or to the previously approved trip cap. If the applicant wishes to increase the intensity in the future, a CFPUDA subject to the public hearing process will be required. Medical Offices Questions were asked about the proposed medical office uses. Any medical office uses are required to be run by non-profit entities in affiliation with the church and will not be a typical, commercial business entity. The meeting concluded at approximately 6:00 PM. Page 2 of 2 H:\2006\2006096A\WP\CFPUD\NIM\NIM Summary (10-4-2021).doex Packet Pg. 1129 9.A.5.g The original name of the PUD was the Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church Community Facilities PUD; and the GMP Subdistrict was the Mission Subdistrict. To align the names with the intent of the PUD and Subdistrict, the names were changed to the Emmanuel Lutheran Church Community Services CFPUD and the Emmanuel Lutheran Church Community Facilities and Services Subdistrict. The names were not updated on the supporting application materials and exhibits, as the name change has no material effect on these documents or exhibits, only on the documents that will be included in the recorded ordinances: the Proposed GMPA Amendment Language, Subdistrict Inset Map, and CPUD Document. Packet Pg. 1130 9.A.5.g PRE -APPLICATION MEETING NOTES 0 a N d w 7 3 E E O U t L U L J d 7 C R E E LU Co rn r N O O O O N O N J d Q Packet Pg. 1131 9.A.5.g CAA County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 Assigned Planner: Pre -Application Meeting Notes Petition Type: PUDA DateandTime: Tuesday 11/24/2020 9:00 AM Nancy Gundlach Engineering Manager (for PPL's and FP's): Project Information Project Name: Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church (PUDA) PL#: 20200002198 Property ID #: See Attached Current Zoning: PUD Project Address: City: Naples State: FL Zip: 34120 Applicant: Robert J. Mulhere, President Hole Montes, Inc. Robert J. Mulhere,President Hole Montes Inc.Paul Agent Name: PaulaN . c . McMichael Phone: 254-2018 Agent/Firm Address: 950 Encore Way City: Naples State: FL Zip; 34110 Property Owner: Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples, Inc. Please provide the following, if applicable: I. Total Acreage: 9.18 ii. Proposed # of Residential Units: iii. Proposed Commercial Square Footage: iv. For Amendments, indicate the original petition number: V. If there is an Ordinance or Resolution associated with this project, please indicate the type and number: vi. If the project is within a Plat, provide the name and AR#/PL#: Updated 7/11/2019 Page 1 1 of 5 Packet Pg. 1132 9.A.5.g Coil er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net Meeting Notes 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239)252-2400 As of 10/16/2017 all Zoning applications have revised applications, and your associated Application is included in your notes; additionally a *new Property Ownership. Disclosure Form is required for all applications. A copy of this new form is included in your pre-app Note — link is https://www.colliergov.net/Home/ShowDocument?id=75093. pICASE Nbvkk Emu►raNMF_N4AL `DA-1,4 For 4'hE 4DO,4,oNAL �b 4rce,l'S ( Aute-5 M4-0 Cis- F-d SPeues) fhE PrcScruE Requ,umry4 CN D WS . 1( (;lures 1 fg 6 IVA-4 dE agOA--i-o,J. Ple,-SE PProuIdE pere4J- 4S4rq 1 Flea aL +a Ej plgi J AQe45 O eared o� NA-+►uE UE�FEI 6'lj PIKE PfouldE /VA(ro;41vE Ff-1A4w' ,T 4-o CLmE Cow%A4j6L Poltcy fie. 1. ► + Pol,t,y I. I IJ - (&rAPA — <-�L-:F i If Site is within the City of Naples Water Service Area please send to Naples Utilities and Planning Departments. Then, if the petition is submitted, we are to send it (by email) to the four persons below in their Utilities and Planning Depts. - along with a request that they send us a letter or email of "no objection" to the petition. Bob Middleton RMiddletonCa)naplesgov.com Allyson Holland AMHolland annaplesgov.com Robin Singer RSingerC@naplesgov.com Erica Martin emartinCcDnaplesgov.com Disclaimer: Information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required data. Updated 7/11/2019 Page 1 2 of 5 Packet Pg. 1133 1 9.A.5.g Environmental PUDZ-PUDA Checklist (non-RFMU) Project Name EM+ NUEL f`ot"elit4L LAMnK 00rc.h 1. Is the project is in compliance with the overlays, districts and/or zoning on the subject site and/or the surrounding properties? (CON, ST, PUD, RLSA, RFMU, etc.) (LDC 2.03.05-2.03.08; 4.08.00) Not in CV Library �2 Submit a current aerial photograph (available from the Property Appraiser's office) and clearly delineate the subject site boundary lines. If the site is vegetated, provide FLUCFCS overlay and vegetation inventory identifying upland, wetland and exotic vegetation (Admin. Code Ch. 3 G.1. Application Contents 424). FLUCFCS Overlay -P627 G Clearly identify the location of all preserves and label each as "Preserve" on all plans. (LDC 3.05.07.H.1). Preserve Label- P546 4. Provide calculations on site plan showing the appropriate acreage of native vegetation to be retained, the max. amount and ratios permitted to be created on -site or mitigated off -site. Exclude vegetation located within utility and drainage easements from the preserve calculations (LDC 3.05.07.13-1); 3.05.07.F; 3.05.07.H. Ld-e). Preserve Calculation - P547 5. Created and retained preserve areas shall meet the minimum width requirements per LDC 3.05.07.H.1.b. Preserve Width - P603 6. Retained preservation areas shall be selected based on the criteria defined in LDC 3.05.07.A.3, include all 3 strata, be in the largest contiguous area possible and shall be interconnected within the site and to adjoining off -site preservation areas or wildlife corridors. (LDC 3.05.07.A.1-4) Preserve Selection- P550 70. Principle structures shall be located a minimum of 25' from the boundary of the preserve boundary. No accessory structures and other site alterations, fill placement, grading, plant alteration or removal, or similar activity shall be permitted within 10' of the boundary unless it can be shown that it will not affect the integrity of the preserve (i.e. stem wall or berm around wetland preserve). Provide cross -sections for each preserve boundary identifying all site alterations within 25'. (LDC 3.05.07.H.3; 6.01.02.C.) Preserve Setback — New 8. Wildlife survey required for sites where an EIS is not required, when so warranted. (LDC 10.02.02.A.2.f) Listed Species - P522 9.) Provide Environmental Data identifying author credentials, consistency determination with the GMPs, off -site / preserves, seasonal and historic high water levels, and analysis of water quality. For land previously used for farm fields or golf course, provide soil sampling/groundwater monitoring reports identifying any site contamination. (LDC 3.08.00) Environmental Data Required — P 522 10. PUD Document and Master Plan shall state the minimum acreage required to be preserved. (LDC 10.02.13.A.2) Master Plan Contents-P626 11. If the PUD includes a Preserve Tract section UP FOR DISCUSSION — DISCUSS WITH CAO When listing preserve uses, the following is suggested: A. Principal Use: Preserve; B. Accessory Uses: All other uses (list as applicable or refer to the LDC — see 1-3 below as typical uses listed by agents) (ensure the text states "subject to LDC section related to Allowable uses within County required preserves" Alternate format: A. Uses subject to LDC section Allowable uses within County required preserves: 1. Nature trails that do not reduce the amount of required preserve. 2. Passive Recreation uses, as per LDC requirements. 3. Stormwater only when in accordance with the LDC. Packet Pg. 1134 11 PUD Commitments and Site Plan notes Where preserves occur adjacent to development off site and will be used in lieu of landscape buffers, include the following condition in the environmental commitments section of the PUD document or master plan: Preserves may be used to satisfy the landscape buffer requirements after exotic vegetation removal in accordance with LDC sections 4.06.02 and 4.06.05.E. I. Supplemental plantings with native plant materials shall be in accordance with LDC section 3.05.07. 12 PUD Document shall identify any listed species found on site and/or describe any unique vegetative features that will be preserved on the site. (LDC 10.02.13.A.2.) Unique Features- P628 Example: A management plan for the entire project shall be submitted in accordance with the requirements and procedures of the LDC for listed species including but not limited to Black Bear, Gopher Tortoise and listed birds. The management plan shall be submitted prior to development of the first phase of the project. 13. Review cross -sections if provided; they are not required with the PUD. However, sometimes they are provided Is there any fill proposed in the preserve? Additional Comments: Packet Pg. 1135 1 9.A.5.g Environmental Data Checklist Project Name 5MMANUPEL >Eva►agEl►tA, LAeMM LOUrch P UQA- The Environmental Data requirements can be found in LDC Section 3.08.00 Provide the EIS fee if PUD or CU. (D WHO AND WHAT COMPANY PREPARED THE ENVIRONMENTAL DATA REPORT? Preparation of Environmental Data. Environmental Data Submittal Requirements shall be prepared by an individual with academic credentials and experience in the area of environmental sciences or natural resource management. Academic credentials and experience shall be a bachelor's or higher degree in one of the biological sciences with at least two years of ecological or biological professional experience in the State of Florida. Please include revision dates on resubmittals. G Identify on a current aerial, the location and acreage of all SFWMD jurisdictional wetlands according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS) and include this information on the SDP or final plat construction plans. Wetlands must be verified by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) or Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) prior to SDP or final plat construction plans approval. For sites in the RFMU district, provide an assessment in accordance with 3.05.07 F and identify on the FLUCFCS map the location of all high quality wetlands (wetlands having functionality scores of at least 0.65 WRAP or 0.7 UMAM) and their location within the proposed development plan. Sites with high quality wetlands must have their functionality scores verified by the SFWMD or DEP prior to first development order approval. Where functionality scores have not been verified by either the SFWMD or DEP, scores must be reviewed and accepted by County staff, consistent with State regulation. 4. SDP or final plat construction plans with impacts to five (5) or more acres of wetlands shall provide an analysis of potential water quality impacts of the project by evaluating water quality loadings expected from the project (post development conditions considering the proposed land uses and stormwater management controls) compared with water quality loadings of the project area as it exists in its pre -development conditions. The analysis shall be performed using methodologies approved by Federal and State water quality agencies, and must demonstrate no increase in nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorous) loadings in the post development scenario. Where treated stormwater is allowed to be directed into preserves, show how the criteria in 3.05.07 H have been met. 6. Where native vegetation is retained on site, provide a topographic map to a half foot and, where possible, provide elevations within each of the FLUCFCS Codes identified on site. For SDP or final plat construction plans, include this information on the site plans. 0( 7. ) Provide a wildlife survey for the nests of bald eagle and for listed species known to inhabit biological �-� communities similar to those existing on site. The survey shall be conducted in accordance with the guidelines or recommendations of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Survey times may be reduced or waived where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low, as determined by the FFWCC and USFWS. Where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low, the survey time may be reduced or waived by the County Manager or designee, when the project is not reviewed or technical assistance not provided by the FFWCC and USFWS. Additional survey time may be required if listed species are discovered 8. Provide a survey for listed plants identified in 3.04.03 9. Wildlife habitat management and monitoring plans in accordance with 3.04.00 shall be required where listed species are utilizing the site or where wildlife habitat management and monitoring plans are required by the FFWCC or USFWS. These plans shall describe how the project directs incompatible land uses away from listed species and their habitats. Identify the location of listed species nests, burrows, dens, foraging areas, and the Packet Pg. 1136 1 location of any bald eagle nests or nest protection zones on the native vegetation aerial with FLUCFCS overlay for the site. Wildlife habitat management plans shall be included on the SDP or final plat construction plans. Bald eagle management plans are required for sites containing bald eagle nests or nest protection zones, copies of which shall be included on the SDP or final plat construction plans. 10. For sites or portions of sites cleared of native vegetation or in agricultural operation, provide documentation that the parcel(s) were issued a permit to be cleared and are in compliance with the 25 year rezone limitation pursuant to section 10.02.06. For sites permitted to be cleared prior to July 2003, provide documentation that the parcel(s) are in compliance with the 10 year rezone limitation previously identified in the GMP. Criteria defining native vegetation and determining the legality, process and criteria for clearing are found in 3.05.05, 3.05.07 and 10.02.06. 11. Identify on a current aerial the acreage, location and community types of all upland and wetland habitats on the project site, according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS), and provide a legend for each of the FLUCFCS Codes identified. Aerials and overlay information must be legible at the scale provided. Provide calculations for the acreage of native vegetation required to be retained on -site. Include the above referenced calculations and aerials on the SDP or final plat construction plans. In a separate report, demonstrate how the preserve selection criteria pursuant to 3.05.07 have been met. Where applicable, include in this report an aerial showing the project boundaries along with any undeveloped land, preserves, natural flowways or other natural land features, located on abutting properties. 12. Include on a separate site plan, the project boundary and the land use designations and overlays for the RLSA, RFMU, ST and ACSC-ST districts. Include this information on the SDP or final plat construction plans. 13. Where off -site preservation of native vegetation is proposed in lieu of on -site, demonstrate that the criteria in section 3.05.07 have been met and provide a note on the SDP or final plat construction plans indicating the type of donation (monetary payment or land donation) identified to satisfy the requirement. Include on the SDP or final plat construction plans, a location map(s) and property identification number(s) of the off -site parcel(s) if off -site donation of land is to occur. 14. Provide the results of any Environmental Assessments and/or Audits of the property, along with a narrative of the measures needed to remediate if required by FDEP. I S Soil and/or ground water sampling shall be required at the time of first development order submittal for sites that occupy farm fields (crop fields, cattle dipping ponds, chemical mixing areas), golf courses, landfill or junkyards or for sites where hazardous products exceeding 250 gallons of liquid or 1,000 pounds of solids were stored or processed or where hazardous wastes in excess of 220 pounds per month or 1 10 gallons at any point in time were generated or stored. The amount of sampling and testing shall be determined by a registered professional with experience in the field of Environmental Site Assessment and shall at a minimum test for organochlorine pesticides (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 8081) and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) 8 metals using Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) soil sampling Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) FS 3000, in areas suspected of being used for mixing and at discharge point of water management system. Sampling should occur randomly if no points of contamination are obvious. Include a background soil analysis from an undeveloped location hydraulically upgradient of the potentially contaminated site. Soil sampling should occur just below the root zone, about 6 to 12 inches below ground surface or as otherwise agreed upon with the registered professional with experience in the field of Environmental Site Assessment. Include in or with the Environmental Site Assessment, the acceptable State and Federal pollutant levels for the types of contamination found on site and indicate in the Assessment, when the contaminants are over these levels. If this analysis has been done as part of an Environmental Audit then the report shall be submitted. The County shall coordinate with the FDEP where contamination exceeding applicable FDEP standards is identified on site or where an Environmental Audit or Environmental Assessment has been submitted. MJJ�f QEQUIREA h Sk U066pml~ + WE 16. Shoreline development must provide an analysis demonstrating that the project will remain fully functional for its intended use after a six-inch rise in sea level. Packet Pg. 13 9.A.5.g 17. Provide justification for deviations from environmental LDC provisions pursuant to GMP CCME Policy 6.1.1 (13), if requested. 18. Where applicable, provide evidence of the issuance of all applicable federal and/or state oil and gas permits for proposed oil and gas activities in Collier County. Include all state permits that comply with the requirements of Chapter 62C-25 through 62C-30, F.A.C., as those rules existed on January 13, 2005. 0-9 Identify any Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones (WRM-ST) within the project area and provide an analysis for how the project design avoids the most intensive land uses within the most sensitive WRM-STs and will comply with the WRM-ST pursuant to 3.06.00. Include the location of the Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones on the SDP or final plat construction plans. For land use applications such as standard and PUD rezones and CUs, provide a separate site plan or zoning map with the project boundary and Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones identified. 20. Demonstrate that the design of the proposed stormwater management system and analysis of water quality and quantity impacts fully incorporate the requirements of the Watershed Management regulations of 3.07.00. 21. For sites located in the Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern -Special Treatment overlay district (ACSC- ST), show how the project is consistent with the development standards and regulations in 4.02.14. 22. For multi -slip docking facilities with ten slips or more, and for all marina facilities, show how the project is consistent with 5.05.02. Refer to the Manatee Protection Plan for site specific requirements of the Manatee Protection Plan not included in 5.05.02. 23. For development orders within RFMU sending lands, show how the project is consistent with each of the applicable Objectives and Policies of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the GMP. 24. The County Manager or designee may require additional data or information necessary to evaluate the project's compliance with LDC and GMP requirements. (LDC 10.02.02.A.3 f) The following to be determined at preapplication meeting: (Choose those that apply) a. Provide overall description of project with respect to environmental and water management issues. b Explain how project is consistent with each of the applicable objectives and policies in the CCME of the GMP. POltCj G-I • I + Pottc,y 1. I • I cO Explain how the project meets or exceeds the native vegetation preservation requirement in the CCME and LDC. d. Indicate wetlands to be impacted and the effects of the impact to their functions and how the project's design compensates for wetland impacts. e. Indicate how the project design minimizes impacts to listed species. Describe the measures that are proposed as mitigation for impacts to listed species. 25. PUD zoning and CU petitions. For PUD rezones and CU petitions, applicants shall collate and package applicable Environmental Data Submittal Requirements into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) document, prior to public hearings and after all applicable staff reviews are complete. Copies of the EIS shall be provided to the County Manager or designee prior to public hearings. 26. Is EAC Review (by CCPC) required? TO Packet Pg. 1138 9.A.5.g 27. PUD master plan or PPL/SDP site plan notes: Where preserves occur adjacent to development off site and will be used in lieu of landscape buffers, include the following condition in the environmental commitments section of the PUD document. Preserves may be used to satisfy the landscape buffer requirements after exotic vegetation removal in accordance with LDC sections 4.06.02 and 4.06.05.E.I I. Supplemental plantings with native plant materials shall be in accordance with LDC section 3.05.07, 28. Additional comments 29. Stipulations for approval (Conditions) Packet Pg. 1139 1 9.A.5.g ThomasClarkeVEN From: TempletonMark Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2020 9:07 AM To: ThomasClarkeVEN Subject: PL20200002198 Pre App Landscape Notes Hi Thomas, You can just copy/paste the following for my notes for this mornings pre-app If updated Master Plan is required, include the perimeter buffer labels. Respectfully, Mark Templeton, RLA Principal Planner/Landscape Review Cv 7EY C014nty Development Review Division Exceeding Expectations, Every Day.! NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples Florida 34104 Phone: 239.252,2475 How are we doing? Please CLICK HERE to fill out a Customer Survey. We appreciate your Feedback! Disclaimer- this email is not to be interpreted as an endorsement or approval of any permit, plan, project, or deviation from the Land Development Code. Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. e'-- rI Packet Pg. 1140 9.A.5.g � Cd ier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 4vA' t 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 9.A.5.g Transportation Planning and PUD Monitoring Pre-App Notes Developer Commitments: Transportation Planning " The maximum total daily trip generation for the PUD shall not exceed two-way PM peak hour net trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval." Use Codes Provide both ITE and SIC use codes in the TIS. PUD Monitoring "One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close- out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this CPUD approval, the Managing Entity is the Insert Company Name Here. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the CPUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed -out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments." Miscellaneous "Pursuant to Section 125.022(5) F.S., issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development." Packet Pg. 1142 9.A.5.g Transportation Comments from Trinity Scott on 11-24-20: Please check the TIS required box on the pre-app checklist as well as methodology on the next page with a note that methodology will be by email to staff (Michael Sawyer). Methodology meeting by email is required and provide note on TIS cover sheet that fee will be collected at time of submittal. Address all transportation elements of the GMP. Provide both ITE and SIC use codes in the TIS. For companion PUD's or rezoning, provide trip limit based on TIS using standard language: "The maximum total daily trip generation for the PUD shall not exceed two-way PM peak hour net trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval." Packet Pg. 1143 1 - 9.A.5.g GMP Amendment Pre -application Meeting Standard Comments The Comprehensive Planning Section schedules all GMP amendment pre -application meetings, which are mandatory, and coordinates the review of all amendment petitions received. Per the Fee Schedule adopted by Resolution 2019-96, the non-refundable pre -application meeting fee is $500.00; it is credited towards the petition fee — if the petition is submitted within nine months. The petition fee is $16,700.00 for a large-scale petition ($9,000.00 for a small-scale petition), which is non-refundable, plus a proportionate share of the legal advertising costs. For small-scale petitions, there are only two hearings — one each before the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) and Board of County Commissioners (BCC. For large-scale amendment petitions, a total of four public hearings are held - Transmittal hearing before CCPC and BCC, and Adoption hearing before CCPC and BCC. The estimated legal advertising costs will be provided to each petitioner and payment will be required prior to advertising for any hearings; any refund due the petitioner after hearings are held will be provided at that time. In addition to the petition fee and legal ad costs noted above, payment must also be made for a Traffic Impact Study Review Fee. This fee should be submitted directly to the Transportation Planning Section. Please see their website at: htti)://www.colliergov.net/index.asi)x?pane=566 and/or contact that Section for more details. A small-scale amendment is limited to a parcel <10 acres in size and is limited to a map amendment only or map amendment with directly related text; further, the map amendment cannot result in a conflict between the map and text — there can be no internal inconsistency in the GMP. For the most part, there is no guidance/criteria/standards provided in the GMP itself by which to review amendments for consistency; one exception is for significant impacts upon public facilities as provided for in Policy 1.1.2 of the CIE. However, Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, does provide guidance. Note particularly the requirement to provide appropriate data and analysis to demonstrate the amendment is needed. Generally, staff reviews for, and an applicant should adequately address in the submittal: • Appropriateness of uses/compatibility with surrounding area. • Impact upon surrounding properties — will it make them less developable under their present FLUM designation? Will it create a domino effect leading to future designation o changes on the surrounding properties? • Need for the designation change — data and analysis, e.g. market demand study for commercial uses, to demonstrate the change is warranted, that more inventory of the requested uses is needed. Too often, the data only demonstrates the petition site is viable o for the proposed uses ("build it & they will come") rather than demonstrate there is a need for a new or expanded GMP provision to provide for the proposed uses, and that the need Q is at the subject location. The data should be specific to the proposed land uses, proposed �- trade service area, persons per household in subject area, etc. as applicable. It is iL recognized there is more than one acceptable methodology, e.g. radial distance from site (ULI standards for neighborhood/community/regional commercial centers), drive time, etc. E Regardless of methodology, the raw data needs to be submitted to allow staff to review it M for completeness and accuracy (sometimes parcels are omitted, double counted, included r when shouldn't be, etc.). Also, as with all submitted documents, maps of trade service area Q need to be legible and include adequate identification features, e.g. major roads, Section- c Township -Range. • LOSS (level of service standards) impacts upon public facilities — roads, potable water, M j sanitary sewer, drainage, solid waste, parks & recreation facilities, etc. • Within the above is consideration of site -specific impacts, e.g. impact upon wetlands and a listed species habitats on -site and nearby; and, traffic impacts (operational/safety) from the 1 Packet Pg. 1144 _ 9.A.5.g traffic volume generated/attracted and/or the ingress/egress points - turning movements, median openings, traffic signals, etc. Included within this would be a comparison between impacts that would be expected under the existing zoning and/or FLUM designation vs. that which could be expected under the proposed amendment. • Consistency/conformity/harmony with other Goals, Objectives, Policies (GOPs) and provisions in the Element being amended and any other Element of the GMP relevant to the petition, as well as any other applicable regulations (e.g. Manatee Protection Plan, specific LDC provisions). • Furtherance of existing GOPs relevant to the petition. • Furtherance of any other plans or designations that is applicable or relevant to the petition (e.g. a redevelopment plan, Area of Critical State Concern, Rural Area of Critical Economic Concern). • Energy efficiency and conservation, as required in HB 697 (2008). Market Study Info for Commercial Requests It is the responsibility of every applicant to utilize and provide the best available data as a sound foundation on which to build their requested amendment. Collier County annually produces population estimates and projections. The County also prepares regular updates to its commercial inventory — and these are available to use in market studies. Generally, the actual need for a FLUM designation change is determined through data and analysis, e.g. market demand study for commercial uses, with results which demonstrate the change is warranted, and that additional inventory of the requested uses is needed. Too often, the data fails to reach the desired standard, merely demonstrating the subject site is viable for the proposed uses ("build it & they will come) rather than demonstrating there is an actual need for a new or expanded GMP provision to provide for the proposed uses, and that this need is best served at this location. Data and analysis should substantiate that benefits from the proposed project will be evident Countywide — or at least throughout the market area to be served, without detriment to other existing and planned developments — and not only to the property owner. The data should be specific to the proposed land uses, proposed trade, market or service area, persons per household in subject area, etc., as applicable. Market demand studies should develop scenarios to explain how the subject property will compete with other `like areas' in or near the market, service or trade, area. Market demand studies should also gauge the amount of vacant units/square footage/leasable area within the Planning Community/Communities involved, and of `like area' nodes in the market area, such as within each Mixed Use Activity Center (MUAC), each Estates Neighborhood Center, each Subdistrict, and so on — acknowledging the premise that vacancies and vacancy rates are valid indicators for determining need/demand/support. A commercial market study should contain a sufficient amount of information for a substantive review, including: Identification and description of the project's trade/market area: • Trade/market area — radial, gravity, drive -time model or other method? o Radial: analyses are performed by selecting and evaluating demographics that fall within a pre- defined radial distance from the business location. Packet Pg. 1145 P 9.A.5.g o Gravity: provides an approximation of business trade area by looking spatially at the distribution of all locations, including competitors, and evaluating each location's relative attractiveness. o Drive -time: analyses include digitized roadway systems (accounts for speed, lanes, barriers, etc.). Method is valid for convenience scenarios where patrons are expected to go to the closest or most logistically convenient location. • Trade/market area size varies depending upon the scale of the development. The boundary may not be spherical — adjusted on the basis of transportation network, geographic constraints, density, etc. 2. Guidelines for determining the Market Area (ULI) Center Type Leading Typical General Typical Minimum Market Size Tenant GLA Range in Minimum Support (Radius) GLA Site Area Required Neighborhood Supermarket 50,000 sq. 30,000 — 3 acres 2,500 — 1 '/z miles or Drugstore ft. 100,000 sq. 40,000 ft. people Community Variety 150,000 sq. 100,000- 10 + acres 40,000 — 3-5 miles Discount or ft. 450,000 sq. 150,000 Junior Dept. ft. people Store Regional One or more 400,000 sq. 300,000 — 30-50 acres 150,000 8 miles full -line ft. 1,000,000 or more or more Dept. stores or more people of at least 100,000 sq. ft. of GLA Trade/market data must include the following figures: (estimates and projections are needed for most categories) • Population • Number of dwelling units • Household income • Total trade area income • Sales per sq. ft. (method — divide total retail sales w/in county by # of sq. ft. of retail space) • Floor Area Ratios (building to land ratios — derive from inventory) • Retail expenditures (some studies break down figures by retail type, others by percentage from Census or other source) • Supportable square feet (divide projected retail expenditures by sales per sq. ft. then multiply supportable sq. ft. by vacancy rate [to obviously account for vacancies]) • Land use requirement (divide total supportable sq. ft. by 43,560 and then by FAR to determine acreage requirements) • Supply of commercial land uses • Compare supply to demand Packet Pg. 1146 4. Office demand is calculated on a per capita method (sq. ft./person) must factor in the vacancy percentage/rate. Too often the "Market Factors"/ "Population Factors" / "Commercial Analysis" portions of a Study appear to provide only some of these figures, but in the form of broad statements and drawn conclusions, with the lack of proper data and analysis evident. Of course, many applicants have chosen to provide more data and analysis, but the items shown above represent the minimum amount of information necessary to form a determination. It is important to carefully organize the amendment package; be sure all exhibits are consistently labeled, are in the proper order, and are correctly referenced on the pages of the application. For site -specific amendments, be sure to clearly identify the subject site, include North arrow and scale, and source. A petition narrative is usually helpful. For corporate ownership, it is not acceptable to only list the corporation name. In some instances, property is owned by a corporation that in turn is comprised of other corporations. It is necessary to provide a list of individuals as officers or stockholders of the corporation(s) for purposes of full disclosure. The objective of disclosure is to reveal the individuals with an interest in the property (including seeing if any staff or public officials are included). For a submitted petition, after the sufficiency review process is complete and the petition package is deemed sufficient, an electronic version of the entire submittal is needed, preferably in PDF format, preferably on a CD. This is because the County has instituted an electronic (paperless) agenda process for the Board of County Commissioners' hearings. For hard copies, the petition packages need to be submitted on 3-hole punch paper - and preferably two-sided copies - as the amendments are presented to hearing bodies in 3-ring binders. The Land Development Code (LDC) requires the petitioner of a site -specific GMP amendment to hold a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) similar to that presently required for Rezone petitions; this would occur after a finding of sufficiency of the petition submittal but prior to the CCPC Transmittal hearing (or CCPC Adoption hearing in case of small-scale amendment). The LDC also requires the petitioner of a site -specific GMP amendment to post a notice(s) of the CCPC hearing on the property, for both Transmittal and Adoption hearings, and notify surrounding property owners within a specified distance by letter. Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239-252-2400 Fax:239-252-2946 Website: hLVs:Hw�A,%v.colliercountvfl sov/your-govemment/divisions a e/comprehensive planning GMPA Pre-App Std Comments_11-19-19 GAMES Planning ServiceslComprehensivelCOMP PLANNING GMP DATAIComp Plan AmendmentslGMP Pre-App Standard Comments dw/ 4- Packet Pg. 1147 1 9.A.5.g Comprehensive Planning comments on Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church PUDA (PL20200002198) This is a companion to the Mission Subdistrict GMPA (PL20200002204). The GMPA must be approved prior to the adoption of the PUDA. The PUDA cannot be deemed consistent until the GMPA has been approved and the effective date is included in the PUDA. The subject site is designated Golden Gate Estates within the Rural Golden Gate Estates SubElement of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. This site was previously approved to be zoned as a Community Facility PUD with Ord. #10-31. Please address Future Land Use Element's Policies 5.6 and 7.1 — 7.4 in your application. i G I Packet Pg. 1148 Co*r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 Pre -Application Meeting Sign -In Sheet P L# 20200002198 Collier County Contact Information: Name Review Discipline Phone Email ❑ David Anthony Environmental Review 252-2497 david.anthony@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Claudine Auclair GMD Operations and Regulatory Management 252-5887 claudine.auclair@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Sally Ashkar Assistant County Attorney 252-8842 sally.ashkar@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Steve Baluch Transportation Planning 252-2361 stephen.baluch@colliercountyfl.gov ❑Ray Bellows Zoning, Planning Manager 252-2463 raymond.bellows@colliercountyfl.gov rie Beard PUD Monitoring 252-5782 laurie.beard@colliercountyfl.gov IC/Craig Brown Environmental Specialist 252-2548 craig.brown@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Ale ndra Casanova Operations Coordinator 252-2658 Alexandra.casanova@colliercountyfl.gov HgWrAshton Cicko Managing Asst. County Attorney 252-8773 heidi.ashton@colliercountyfl.gov Thomas Clarke Operations Coordinator 252-2584 thomas.clarke@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jamie Cook Prin. Environmental Specialist 252-6290 Jaime.cook@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Eric Fey, P.E. Utility Planning 252-1037 eric.fey@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Tim Finn, AICP Zoning Division 252-4312 timothy.finn@colliercountyfl.gov Sue Faulkner Comprehensive Planning 252-5715 sue.faulkner@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jeremy Frantz LDC Manager 252-2305 Jeremy.Frantz@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ James French Growth Management Deputy Department Head 252-5717 james.french@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Michael Gibbons Structural/Residential Plan Review 252-2426 michael.gibbons@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Storm Gewirtz, P.E. Engineering Stormwater 252-2434 storm.gewirtz@colliercountyfl.gov Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA Zoning Division 252-2484 nancy.gundlach@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Richard Henderlong Principal Planner 252-2464 1 rchard. hen derlong@col liercountyfLgov ❑ John Houldsworth Engineering Subdivision 252-5757 1 john.houldsworth@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Alicia Humphries Right -Of -Way Permitting 252-2326 alicia.humphries@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Erin Josephitis Environmental Specialist, Senior 252-2915 erin.josephitis@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Marcia Kendall Comprehensive Planning 252-2387 marcia.kendall@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ John Kelly Zoning Senior Planner 252-5719 john.kelly@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Diane Lynch Operations Analyst 252-8243 diane.lynch@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Gil Martinez Zoning Principal Planner 252-4211 gilbert.martinez@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Thomas Mastroberto Greater Naples Fire 252-7348 thomas.mastroberto@colliercountyfl.gov Updated 7/11/2019 Page 1 4 of 5 Packet Pg. 1149 1 9.A.5.g Co*lr County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 ❑ Jack McKenna, P.E. Engineering Services 252-2911 jack. mckenna@colliercountyfLgov ❑ Matt McLean, P.E. Development Review Director 252-8279 matthew.mclean@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Michele Mosca, AICP Capital Project Planning 252-2466 michele.mosca@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Annis Moxam Addressing 252-5519 annis.moxam@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Richard Orth Stormwater Planning 252-5092 rich ard.orth@colliercountyfLgov ❑ Brandy Otero Transit 252-5859 bra ndy.otero@colliercountyfLgov ❑ Brandi Pollard Utility Impact fees 252-6237 brandi.pollard@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Todd Riggall North Collier Fire 597-9227 triggall@northcollierfire.com ❑ Brett Rosenblum, P.E. Development Review Principal Project Manager 252-2905 brett.rosenblum@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ James Sabo, AICP Zoning Principal Planner 252-2708 james.sabo@colliergo.net ❑ Michael Sawyer Transportation Planning 252-2926 michael.sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov Corby Schmidt, AICP Comprehensive Planning 252-2944 corby.schmidt@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Chris Scott, AICP Development Review - Zoning 252-2460 chris.scott@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Linda Simmons North Collier Fire 252-2311 Linda.Simmons@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Peter Shawinsky Architectural Review 252-8523 peter. shawinsky@collie rcountyfLgov ❑ Camden Smith Zoning Operations Manager 252-1042 camden.smith@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Mark Strain Hearing Examiner/CCPC 252-4446 mark.strain@colliercountyfl.gov Mark Templeton Landscape Review 252-2475 mark.templeton@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jessica Velasco Zoning Division Operations 252-2584 jessica.velasco@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jon Walsh, P.E. Building Review 252-2962 jonathan.walsh@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ David Weeks, AICP Comprehensive Planning Future Land Use Consistency 252-2306 david.weeks@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Kirsten Wilkie Environmental Review Manager 252-5518 kirsten.wilkie@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Christine Willoughby Development Review -Zoning 252-5748 christine.willoughby@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Daniel Zunzunegui North Collier Fire 252-2310 Daniel.Zunzunegui@colliercountyfl.gov Additional Attendee Contact Information- RK I fir, MIA Updated 7/11/2019 Page 1 5 of 5 *oe4 Packet Pg. 1150 1 /'� Applicant/Agent may also send site Co'd iC-�/� ! C014Kty plans or conceptual plans for review in advance if desired. Growth Management Department Zoning Division PL20200002198 —Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church (PUDA)- Planner Nancy Gundlach Assigned Ops Staff: Thomas Clarke Jeremy Frantz-Ops Staff) STAFF FORM FOR SUPPLEMENTAL PRE -APPLICATION MEETING INFORMATION • Name and Number of who submitted pre-app request Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, President/Hole Montes, Inc. Paula N. C. McMichael, AICP/Director of Planning/Hole Montes, Inc. • Agent to list for PL# Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, President/Hole Montes, Inc. Paula N. C. McMichael, AICP/Hole Montes, Inc. • Owner of property (all owners for all parcels) • Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples, Inc. Folio #s: 39896040009, 39897520007, 39897520104, 39897560009, 39897600008, 39897600105, 39897640000,39899120007,39899160009,39899240000,39899200008,40241680003,40241720002, 40241760004,39896000007 • Confirm Purpose of Pre-App: (Rezone, etc.) 14 -?- We intend to amend the Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church CFPUD (Ord. 11-23) by adding acres for church expansion. This is a companion item to a GMPA PL- 0200002204) which would amend the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (map and text) to add thes 14.2 acre�o the Mission Subdistrict. Th"S zf ?e-,... j'of3 M Please include any Surveys, Drawings or Plans for the petition: See attached Survey • Details about Project: We intend to amend the Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church CFPUD (Ord. 11-23) by adding 9.18 acres for church expansion. This is a companion item to a GMPA (PL-20200002204) which would amend the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (map and text) to add these 14.2 acres to the Mission Subdistrict. REQUIRED Supplemental Information provided by: Name: Paula N. C. McMichael, AICP Title: Director of Planning Email: paulamcmichael@hmeng.com Phone: 239-254-2018 Cancellation/Reschedule Requests: Contact Danny Condomina-Client Services Supervisor danny.condomina colliercountyfl Phone: 239-252-68_ n � r Zoning Division • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, Honda 34104.239-252-2400 • m w.colliergov.net Packet Pg. 1151 1 9.A.5.g Co*.r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliercounty.gov (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: ❑ PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code iendment to PUD- Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code MVV� J4 /; D to PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative CodeMW �(W/ The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the e-�V�l n ppleW�cateoaln Meetingvwan time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with an up-to-date application. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. A Model PUD Document is available online at http://www.colliercountvfl.gov/Home/ShowDocument?id=76983. REQUIREMENTS # OF COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Cover Letter with Narrative Statement including a detailed description of why amendment is necessary 1 ❑ Completed Application with required attachments (download latest version) 1 Pre -application meeting notes 1 ❑ Affidavit of Authorization signed and notarized Property Ownership Disclosure Form 1 1 Notarized and completed Covenant of Unified Control 1 Completed Completed Addressing 1 Warranty Deed(s) 1 ❑ List Identifying Owner and all parties of corporation 1 ❑ Signed and sealed Boundary Survey 1 ®/ ❑ Architectural Rendering of proposed structures 1 ❑ Current Aerial Photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. 1 UP/' ❑ Statement of Utility Provisions 1 ❑ Environmental Data Requirements pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 1IX ❑ Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) packet at time of public hearings. Coordinate with project planner at time of public hearings. ❑ ❑ Listed or Protected Species survey, less than 12 months old. Include of previous surveys. 1 ❑ El Traffic Impact Study — FYI. cuLLe-cr 10 ,aT 1 ElHistorical Survey _ 1 ❑ School Impact Analysk Application, Applicable 1 ❑ I❑ Electronic copy of all required documents 1 ❑ Completed Exhibits A-F (see below for additional information)' ❑ ❑ List of requested deviations from the LDC eth justification for each (this document is separate from Exhibit E) '- i ❑ �/ LW ❑ Checklist con es on next page March 4, 2020 Page 9 of 11 Packet Pg. 1152 1 9.A.5.g Cio eY County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.col liercounty.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FA 25-6 M,� Revised Conceptual Master Site Plan 24" x 36"and One 8 %" x 11" copy ❑ ❑ Original PUD document/ordinance, and Master Plan 24" x 36" — Only if Amending the PUD ❑ ❑ Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru & underlined 1 ❑ Copy of Official Interpretation and/or Zoning Verification 1 ❑ *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement 'The following exhibits are to be completed on a separate document and attached to the application packet: Exhibit A: List of Permitted Uses ❑ Exhibit B: Development Standards ❑ Exhibit C: Master Plan- See Chapter 3 E. 1. of the Administrative Code ❑ Exhibit D: Legal Description ❑ Exhibit E: List of Requested LDC Deviations and justification for each ❑ Exhibit F: List of Development Commitments If located in RFMU (Rural Fringe Mixed Use) Receiving Land Areas Pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08.A.2.a.2.(b.)i.c., the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239- 690-3500 for information regarding "Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan." PLANNERS — INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: ❑School District (Residential Components): Amy El Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Johnson Utilities Engineering: Eric Fey Parks and Recreation: Barry Williams (Director) ❑ Emergency Management: Dan Summers Immokalee Water/Sewer District: ❑ City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director ❑ Other: ❑ City of Naples Utilities ❑ Other: ) I ASSOCIATED FEES FOR APPLICATION �I %K re -Application Meeting: $500.00 l� . Rezone: $10,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre 1 UD to PUD Rezone: $8,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre ❑ PAmendment: $6,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $2,250.00 X Environmental Data Requirements -EIS Packet (submittal determined at pre -application meeting): $2,500.00 ❑ Listed or Protected Species Review (when an EIS is not required): $1,000.00 ("Transportation Review Fees: r/Methodology Review: $500.00 — 13Y Z^'#« ' �"� T° g� °"�� Q`��D AT T'"`� �c 944MkIf . *Additional fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting. o Minor Study Review: $750.00 o Major Study Review $1,500.00 March 4, 2020 Page 10 of 11 Packet Pg. 1153 J Co*r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliercounty.gov (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Legal ertising Fees: 7CC : $1,125.00 - CC: $500.00 ❑ School Concurrency Fee, if applicable: o Mitigation Fees, if application, to be determined by the School District in coordination with the County Fire Code Plans Review Fees are not listed, but are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. *Additional fee for the 51 and subsequent re -submittal will be accessed at 20% of the original fee. Signature of Petitioner or Agent Printed named of signing party March 4, 2020 Date Page 11 of 11 Packet Pg. 1154 1 9.A.5.g PUDA APPLICATION 0 a N d w 7 3 E E O U t L U c L J d 7 C R LU Co rn r N O O O O N O N J d Co ti N C O d C O O Q Q LL r C d E L v R a E m a Packet Pg. 1155 9.A.5.g Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Apphcatlon for a PUblic Hearhng for PUD Rezone, Amendmentlo PUD or PUDWPUDRezone:, PETITION NO PROJECT NAME To be completed by staff DATE PROCESSED ❑ PUD Rezone (PUDZ): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A.-F., Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code ❑■ Amendment to PUD (PUDA): LDC subsection 10.02.13 E. and Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone (PUDR): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A.-F. A, PLICANT CONTACT • Name of Property Owner(s): Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples, Inc. Name of Applicant if different than owner: _ Address: 777 Mooring Line Drive city: Telephone: Naples 239-206-3082 cell: N/A State: FL ZIP:34102 Fax. N/A E-Mail Address: h.isaacson@emmanuelcommunities.org Name of Agent: Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, President/CEO Firm: Hole Montes, Inc. Address: 950 Encore Way Telephone: 239-254-2000 Cell: City: N/A E-Mail Address: bobmulhere@hmeng.com Naples State: FL Zip: 34110 Fax: N/A Be aware that Collier County has lobbyist regulations. Guide yourself accordingly and ensure that you are in compliance with these regulations. Name of Agent: Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire Firm: Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. Address: 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300, Naples, FL 34103 Phone/Fax:239-435-3535,239-435-1218 Email:ryovanovich@cyklawfirm.com March 4, 2020 Page 1 of 11 Packet Pg. 1156 9.A.5.g �r Go er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 REZONE REQUEST This application is requesting a rezone from: Estates Zoning district(s) to the Present Use of the Property: CFPUD zoning district(s). Vacant Proposed Use (or range of uses) of the property: Church and Church -related uses Original PUD Name: Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples, Inc. CFPUD Ordinance No.: Ord No. 11-23 PROPERTY INFORMATION On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the application: • If the request involves changes to more than one zoning district, the applicant shall include a separate legal description for property involved in each district; • The applicant shall submit 4 copies of a recent survey (completed within the last six months, maximum 1" to 400' scale), if required to do so at the pre -application meeting; and • The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions arise concerning the legal description, an engineer's certification or sealed survey may be required. Section/Township/Range: Is 48 28 Lot: Block: Subdivision: Golden Gate Estates Units 64 & 69 Metes & Bounds Description: See attached Boundary Survey Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: See attached List of Folio Numbers Size of Property: 1,650 ft. x ,560 ft. = 1,563,804 Total Sq. Ft. Acres: 35.9 ac_ Address/ General Location of Subject Property: South side of Oil Well Rd, approx. % -mile west of the intersection of Oil Well Road & Everglades Blvd PUD District (refer to LDC subsection 2.03.06 Q ❑ Commercial ❑ Residential ❑� Community Facilities ❑ Mixed Use ❑ Other: March 4, 2020 ❑ Industrial Page 2 of 11 Packet Pg. 1157 9.A.5.g FOLIO NUMBERS 39896040009, 39897520007, 39897520104, 39897560009, 39897600008, 39997600105, 39897640000, 39899120007, 39899160009, 39899240000, 39899200008, 40241680003, 40241720002, 40241760004, 39896000007 Packet Pg. 1158 9.A.5.g co ter Couf.ty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE Zoning Land Use N E - Estates Oil Well Road, Single -Family Residential, Stormwater Manage.Lake S E - Estates 31st Ave NE, Single -Family Residential, Vacant E E - Estates Vacant W E - Estates Single -Family Residential If the owner of the subject property owns contiguous property please provide a detailed legal description of the entire contiguous property on a separate sheet attached to the application. Section/Township/Range: Lot: Block: Subdivision: Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: Metes & Bounds Description: ASSOCIATIONS Required: List all registered Home Owner Association(s) that could be affected by this petition. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Board of County Commissioner's website at http://www.colliergov.net/Index.aspx?page=774. Name of Homeowner Association: Golden Gate Estates Area Civic Association, Inc. Mailing Address: 2631 4th Street NW City: Naples State: FL ZIP: 34120 Name of Homeowner Association: Valencia Golf & Country Club HOA, Inc. Mailing Address: 1711 Double Eagle Trail City: Naples State: FL Zip: 34120 Name of Homeowner Association: Citrus Greens at Orange Tree HOA, Inc. Mailing Address: 1130 Grove Drive City: Naples State: FL Name of Homeowner Association: _Waterways of Naples HOA, Inc. Mailing Address: 12650 Whitehall Drive Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: March 4, 2020 City: Fort Myers State: FL City: State: ZIP: 34120 Q u: r m ZIP: 33907 W Q ZIP: E t U Q Page 3 of 11 Packet Pg. 1159 9.A.5.g COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov coffer County EVALUATION CRITERIA 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Pursuant to LDC subsections 10.02.13 B, 10.02.08 F and Chapter 3 G. of the Administrative Code, staff's analysis and recommendation to the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission's recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners shall be based upon consideration of the applicable criteria. On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a narrative statement describing the rezone request with specific reference to the criteria below. Include any backup materials and documentation in support of the request. Please see attached Evaluation Criteria a. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. b. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the county attorney. C. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. (This is to include identifying what Sub -district, policy or other provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that Sub -district, policy or other provision.) d. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. e. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. f. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. g. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. h. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. Deed Restrictions: The County is legally precluded from enforcing deed restrictions; however, many communities have adopted such restrictions. You may wish to contact the civic or property owners association in the area for which this use is being requested in order to ascertain whether or not the request is affected by existing deed restrictions. March 4, 2020 Page 4 of 11 Packet Pg. 1160 9.A.5.g ;4 cAky County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Previous land use petitions on the subject property: To your knowledge, has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? If so, what was the nature of that hearing? No. Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? Yes FN-] No if so please provide copies. PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS This land use petition requires a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM), pursuant to Chapter 3 E. of the Administrative Code and LDC section 10.03.06. Following the NIM, the applicant will submit a written summary and any commitments that have been made at the meeting. Refer to Chapter 8 B. OT the Administrative Lode Tor the NI IVI procedural requirements. Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code requires that the applicant must remove their public hearing advertising sign(s) after final action is taken by the Board of County Commissioners. Based on the Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing advertising sign(s) immediately. RECORDING OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS Within 30 days of adoption of the Ordinance, the owner or developer (specify name) at their expense shall record in the Public Records of Collier County a Memorandum of Understanding of Developer Commitments or Notice of Developer Commitments that contains the legal description of the property that is the subject of the land use petition and contains each and every commitment of the owner or developer specified in the Ordinance. The Memorandum or Notice shall be in form acceptable to the County and shall comply with the recording requirements of Chapter 695, FS. A recorded copy of the Memorandum or Notice shall be provided to the Collier County Planned Unit Development Monitoring staff within 15 days of recording of said Memorandum or Notice. LDC subsection 10.02.08 D This application will be considered "open" when the determination of "sufficiency" has been made and the application is assigned a petition processing number. The application will be considered "closed" when the petitioner withdraws the application through written notice or ceases to supply necessary information to continue processing or otherwise actively pursue the rezoning, amendment or change, for a period of 6 months. An application deemed "closed" will not receive further processing and an application "closed" through inactivity shall be deemed withdrawn. An application deemed "closed" may be re -opened by submission of a new application, repayment of all application fees and the grant of a determination of "sufficiency". Further review of the request will be subject to the then current code. March 4, 2020 Page 5 of 11 Packet Pg. 1161 9.A.5.g CoffINS,, ier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS FOR PUD REZONE REQUEST APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s): Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples, Inc. Address: 777 Mooring Line Drive Telephone. 239-206-3082 Cell: N/A City: Naples state: FL ZIP: 34102 Fax: N/A E-Mail Address: h.isaacson@emmanuelcommunities.org Address of Subject Property (if available): City: Naples State: FL _ 2730, 2770, 2862, 2920 Oil Well Rd; 2925, 2935, 2945 31st Ave NE ZIP: 34120 PROPERTY INFORMATION Section/Township/Range: 19/ 48/ 28 Lot: Block: Subdivision: Golden Gate Estates Units 64 & 69 Metes & Bounds Description: See Boundary Survey Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: See List of Folio Numbers TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO BE PROVIDED Check applicable system: a. County Utility System ❑ b. City Utility System ❑ C. Franchised Utility System ❑ Provide Name: N/A d. Package Treatment Plant ❑ (GPD Capacity): e. Septic System x❑ TYPE OF WATER SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED Check applicable system: a. County Utility System ❑ b. City Utility System ❑ C. Franchised Utility System ❑ Provide Name: d. Private System (Well) x❑ N/A 2 single-family dwelling units; 1,000 seat church; school w/ 750 students; daycare w/ 200 participants; Total Population to be Served: Peak and Average Daily Demands: 3,600 SF of medical offices; 56 A. Water -Peak: 53,508 GPD Average Daily: 41,160 GPD meals prepped weekly; 15,000 SF of B. Sewer -Peak: 83 GPM Average Daily: 29,400 GPD office uses If proposing to be connected to Collier County Regional Water System, please provide the date service is expected to be required: March 4, 2020 Page 6 of 11 Packet Pg. 1162 9.A.5.g t . 4 Co L� Y County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Narrative statement: Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and schematic drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the method of affluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation data and soil involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional engineer. Utilities do not currently serve the site; however, the intent is to move forward with creating an interim utilities agreement that would allow for the applicant to construct interim facilities that would eventually connect to county -owned water and sewer, based on the county's long-term but currently unfunded plans to extend utilities along Oil Well Road. Collier County Utility Dedication Statement: If the project is located within the service boundaries of Collier County's utility service system, a notarized statement shall be provided agreeing to dedicate the water distribution and sewage collection facilities within the project area to the Collier County Utilities. This shall occur upon completion of the construction of these facilities in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at that time. This statement shall also include an agreement that the applicable system development charges and connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. If applicable, the statement shall contain an agreement to dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer systems. Statement of Availability Capacity from other Providers: Unless waived or otherwise provided for at the pre -application meeting, if the project is to receive sewer or potable water services from any provider other than the County, a statement from that provider indicating adequate capacity to serve the project shall be provided. March 4, 2020 Page 7 of 11 Packet Pg. 1163 9.A.5.g Project Capacity - RESIDENTIAL A = Type of Unit B = Number of C = Population D = Total E = Per Capita F = Total G = Peak hour Units per Unit Population Flow (gpd) Average Daily flow (gpm) (B x C) Flow (gpd) (D x E) Residence* 2 2.5 5 100 F 500 1.5 *100 gal/day per person and 2.5 people per household = 250 GPD per residential unit per Collier County Design Criteria, Part 2 "Wastewater Collection and Transmission Systems" Peak Factor = 18 + (p)1/2 4 + (P)1/2 P= 0.005 (total population / 1000) Peak Factor (PF) =1 4.4 Note: Peak factor calculation per 10 State Standards. 3/30/2018 CCPU Wastewater Flow Packet Pg. 1164 9.A.5.g Project Capacity - COMMERCIAL Type of Establishment # Units GPD/Unit GPD Doctor and dentist office, per practitioner 2 250 500 Doctor and dentist office, per employee per 8-hour shift 9 15 135 Food operations, Institutions, per meal 8 5 40 Hotel or motel, Regular, per room 20 100 2,000 Hotel or motel, Add for establishments with self service laundry facilities, per machine 2 750 1,500 Office building, per square foot of floor space, whichever is greater 15,000 0.15 2,250 Subtotal 6,425 Total Average Total Peak Total Peak Daily Flow Peak Factor Hour Flow Hour Flow (GPD) (GPD) (GPM) 6,425 4.3 27,572 19.1 3/27/2018 CCPU Wastewater Flow Worksheets Packet Pg. 1165 9.A.5.g Project Capacity - INSTITUTIONAL Type of Establishment # Units GPD/Unit GPD Church, including typical kitchen wastewater flows, per seat 1,000 3 3,000 Park, public picnic, toilets only, per person 100 4 400 Park, public picnic, bathhouse, showers & toilets, per person 100 10 1,000 School, day type, with showers, with cafeteria, per student 950 18 17,100 School, day type, per worker 65 15 975 Subtotal 22,475 Total Average Total Peak Total Peak Daily Flow Peak Factor Hour Flow Hour Flow (GPD) (GPD) (GPM) 22,475 4.1 92,802 64.4 3/27/2018 CCPU Wastewater Flow Worksheets 0 a m r �a LL. r E E O U t L C) c L J a� c E E Lu w M N O O O O N O N J a Packet Pg. 1166 9.A.5.g Project Capacity - MIXED USE A = Type of Unit B = Number of C = Population Units per Unit D = Total Population (B x C) E = Per Capita Flow (gpd) F = Total Average Daily Flow (gpd) (D x E) G = Peak hour flow (gpm) Residential* 2 2.5 5 100 500 1 Commercial** 64 100 6,425 18 Institutional** 225 100 22,475 1 64 TOTAL 294 100 29,400 1 83 *100 gal/day per person and 2.5 people per household = 250 GPD per residential unit per Collier County Design Criteria, Part 2 "Wastewater Collection and Transmission Systems" **Use population equivalent based on average daily flow. Peak Factor = 18 + (p)112 4 + (p)1/2 P= 0.294 (total population / 1000) Peak Factor (PF) =1 4.1 Note: Peak factor calculation per 10 State Standards. 3/27/2018 CCPU Wastewater Flow Worksheets Packet Pg. 1167 Co� ie�r .Go�a.;�ty COLUiEWCOUNTY'GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT wwwi Go III arco unty. Lvov 296606ktk komsii- pg DRIVE NAPLE$? FLORIDA, j4164: (231) M4406 Wi.-W0.)45Z=153j.8 COVENANT OF UNIFIED C011TROL. The qndersfgned:do hereby swearqr:afflnjn,that we are'thefee simple.titleholders -andtowneed'..c�f'ree6r coonly known as. PUr)A-PL2o2oddo2W8 d QfipropertV rriffi (str#eit' address and:Cityj Statd.and.zlp Code) and legally described In Exhibit A attached hereto, The property described herein is the subject of an -application for PPOA 'planned unit development (PUb) zoning, We hereby designateP.k4"d"k4N.WhuapYevenmish legal rep rbsentatlVe tbereof, r6pJrbsentat1vbs of.(he property and as!such; these individuals are 'authorized to legally-blhO ; of - I 'i3winbq 6f:th-6-0. the :cou e: of seeking:the, necessary property rty In. approvals to develop, udies, but h , , . Tpip authority Inicii 451-not Ifmite -to.,1he Win .,and aUthoelz6tl66'6f.pg.(*ts to-.asAst In'the preparation dap . .. .1 'v —.9 Ing approval on the site, These representatives Will remain the only ehfft�. io authorize, d.�Veloo*fninfacWify on the property until such time as anew or amended covdhant.of uniff4cont control de ' .. I' ro delivered oCollier county,. The Ufiderslgn6d recognize* the following aiyd.*'.Wfll be gulded'acc.ordlNgly.1nihe pursuit of devdlo'0tqbnt,.bhhb pr oject; roject; 1. The property will be d6velopeo and used Inconformity with the.approved master plan Including all condlitio on' the dev6loptne.ni. 'and .all agreed to by the applicant- in connection with . the p'l6n6ed unit development -rezoning. 2; The]ggal-tepresen - tative idehilfied..,herein.it.e.ekspphtlb[d for. compliance with oil terms, conditions; stipulations made the time of 'approval of the. matter plan,. e Ifth.epropeeiy;issubsequentiVsold 'ih".'Wh'i)I `6 even e r4n a recorded y:CoIIfdr'.CduJ6ty, part; unless and until a new oramended covehAntof uAlfle.0 control Is -de N' red -.to and � d-'d;b' ' . -tot di 3. A departure from the P(OVISION'of the approved plans or a failure t �c MPI With any requl* q-0 y reJm.bnts,I'condIfloht,-br safeguards provided for In the planned unit development process will constitute'a violation of the. Land Development Code.. 4. All'feems an ' d conditions of the planned unit deWopment appeci\i.al, will. be Incorporated into c0v�qtj4rtj arid'. restricts o ns. which run With the land.so as'to provide notice to subseq uent owners that all development activity within the -planned unit deve.lopment n1.Ust be consistent with those terms and cohdItl0ris; S, So long as this -,,covenant Is In force, Coillier CouniV can', upowt . he disco . V6rV of . noncompliance with -the terms,, safeguards, and conditions. of the plainned unit development, seek 'equitable r.ellef R4 necessary to compel compliance, The County will not Issue permits, -certificates, or licenses to occupy'or use anypart :ofth.eplannedunit development and the County may stop b1ligglogconstructlon activity until the project Isbroughth to,comp,llance all nditionseguards of the planned unit development. Clw'ner Thdniao.Js*ck'sdn, President PrWi'a NiM4 Printed Mirna Hmtnan,u* L Evangelical Lutheran Church of Napie8ij Inc; STATE.60 FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLDER The fore k I d bef6re,me.by nneans of ph presence orE]onIin6'riqt#eJ 6 this day of. 791.n "..,ument. as ac now age i troh -by.( rfnt' U6�as Jackson, Pm ep, p �d.narno.WoWn�ror�qi)' fler). Wdent Such 06tsbn(s). NotaryPrublic must 'check appllcpble box;: ee personally -known to me g'Has produced a cuiraint'drivers license sy Notary Publa Sao'bf FlorldiQHas'produced as Identification, cation, tRna F1 10rSignature: I Notary Expi(as 03107rA 22 eA- ry i0A AAA I March 4, 2020 P*Abf 11. IL to A) U LL I Packet Pg. 1168 9.A.5.g 39896040009, 39897520007, 39897520104, 39897560009, 39897600008, 39897600105, 39897640000, 39899120007, 39899160009, 39899240000, 39899200008, 40241680003, 40241720002,40241760004,39896000007 Packet Pg. 116971 9.A.5.g Co' CDC County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code Amendment to PUD- Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with an up-to-date application. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. A Model PUD Document is available online at http://www.colliercountvfl.gov/Home/ShowDocument?id=76983. REQUIREMENTS COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Cover Letter with Narrative Statement including a detailed description of why amendment is necessary 1 ❑ ❑ Completed Application with required attachments (download latest version) 1 Pre -application meeting notes 1 0 ❑ Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 1 Property Ownership Disclosure Form 1 Notarized and completed Covenant of Unified Control 1 Completed Addressing Checklist 1 Warranty Deed(s) 1 ❑ List Identifying Owner and all parties of corporation 1 ❑ Signed and sealed Boundary Survey 1 0 ❑ Architectural Rendering of proposed structures 1 ❑ Current Aerial Photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. 1 ❑ ❑ Statement of Utility Provisions 1 0 ❑ Environmental Data Requirements pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 1 ❑ Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) pacl<et at time of public hearings. Coordinate with project planner at time of public hearings. 0 ❑ ❑ Listed or Protected Species survey, less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys. 1 ❑ ❑ Traffic Impact Study 1 ❑ Historical Survey 1 ❑ School Impact Analysis Application, if applicable 1 ❑ I 0 Electronic copy of all required documents 1 ❑ ❑ Completed Exhibits A-F (see below for additional information)' ❑ 0 ❑ List of requested deviations from the LDC with justification for each (this document is separate from Exhibit E) ❑ ❑ ❑ Checklist continues on next page March 4, 2020 Page 9 of 11 Packet Pg. 1170 9.A.5.g Cotiet r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Revised Conceptual Master Site Plan 24" x 36"and One 8 %" x 11" copy ❑ ❑ ❑ Original PUD document/ordinance, and Master Plan 24" x 36" —Only if Amending the PUD ❑ ❑ ❑ Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru & underlined 1 0 ❑ Copy of Official Interpretation and/or Zoning Verification 1 ❑ Q *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement 'The following exhibits are to be completed on a separate document and attached to the application packet: ❑ Exhibit A: List of Permitted Uses ❑ Exhibit B: Development Standards ❑ Exhibit C: Master Plan- See Chapter 3 E. 1. of the Administrative Code ❑ Exhibit D: Legal Description ❑ Exhibit E: List of Requested LDC Deviations and justification for each ❑ Exhibit F: List of Development Commitments If located in RFMU (Rural Fringe Mixed Use) Receiving Land Areas Pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08.A.2.a.2.(b.)i.c., the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239- 690-3500 for information regarding "Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan." PLANNERS — INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: ❑ School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart ❑ Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Johnson ❑■ Utilities Engineering: Eric Fey FE-1 Parks and Recreation: Barry Williams (Director) ❑ Emergency Management: Dan Summers ❑ Immokalee Water/Sewer District: ❑ City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director ❑ Other: ❑ City of Naples Utilities T ❑ Other: ASSOCIATED FEES FOR APPLICATION ZI Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 ❑ PUD Rezone: $10,000.00* plus $25,00 an acre or fraction of an acre ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone: $8,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre ® PUD Amendment: $6,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre N Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $2,250.00 ® Environmental Data Requirements -EIS Packet (submittal determined at pre -application meeting): $2,500.00 ❑ Listed or Protected Species Review (when an EIS is not required): $1,000.00 ® Transportation Review Fees: 7,� Methodology Review: $500.00 *Additional fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting. o Minor Study Review: $750.00 o Major Study Review $1,500.00 March 4, 2020 Page 10 of 11 Packet Pg. 1171 9.A.5.g Coer County em COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliercounty.gov (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Legal Advertising Fees: • CCPC: $1,125.00 • BCC: $500.00 0 School Concurrency Fee, if applicable: o Mitigation Fees, if application, to be determined by the School District in coordination with the County Fire Code Plans Review Fees are not listed, but are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. *Additional fee for the 51 and subsequent re -submittal will be accessed at 20% of the original fee. Signature of Petitioner or Agent Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, President/CEO Printed named of signing party March 4, 2020 4-19-2023 Date Page 11 of 11 Packet Pg. 1172 9.A.5.g AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PUOA•PL-20200o02188 8cMPA-Pi-20200002204 1, THOMAS JACKSON (print name), as PRESIDENT (title, if applicable) Of EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH OFNAPLES, INC. (company, if applicable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner / applicant =Contract purchaser=and that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. Well authorize Paula N. C. McMichael, AICP, Robert J. Mulhem, FAICP & Richard Yovanovich, Esq. to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. *Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the core, pros, or v, pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L,L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner" of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee" • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and than use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts fat in it are tru Si natureTh mas Jackson, President D to Emmanuel Evangelical t an Church of Naples, Inc, STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was acknowleged before me by means of physical presence or ®onllne notarization this Qday of 2t�, by (printed name of owner or ifler) Such person(,) Notary ublic must check applicable box: Are personally known to me El Has produced a current drivers license rl Has produced as ident' i ation. Notary Signature: CP108-COA-001151155 RrV 3141202IJ �4I ,onY"k,. Noild%(9q 11c Stale of Ftorida 'y Regina Fidler My Commission GG 183583 '4,0,,,dv Expires 0310712022 Packet Pg. 1173 9.A.5.g LETER OF CONSENT 0 a N d w 7 3 E E O U t L U c L J d 7 C R E E LU Co rn r N O O O O N O N J d co ti N C O d C O O Q Q LL r C d E L v R a E m a Packet Pg. 1174 9.A.5.g Emmanuel Communities, Inc 777 Mooring Line Drive • Naples, FL 34102 Tel: 239-261-0894 • Fax: 239-261-1802 www.EmmanuelCommunities.org LETTER OF CONSENT TO COLLIER COUNTY The undersigned do hereby swear or affirm that they agree to be responsible for PUD monitoring for the project known as Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church Community Facilities Planned Unit Development and the property identified as parcel numbers: 39896040009,39897520007,39897520104,39897560009,39897600008,39897600105, 39897640000,39899120007,39899160009,39899240000,39899200008,40241680003, 40241720002,40241760004,39896000007. This representative will remain the only managing entity until such time as a new or amended authorization is delivered to Collier County. Emmanuel Commun Howard Isaacson September 8, 2022 This instrument was acknowledged before me this _8 day of September, 2022, by Howard Isaacson, CEO of Emmanuel Communities, Inc., a Florida corporation, on behalf of the corporation. X Personally Known Produced Identification Type and # of ID (Signature Notary)A -a I N IeA (Seal): Notary Publnn idle of flod/a Reppina Fidler MYHH til7l0 on • Exp. 3/7/2020 Packet Pg. 1175 9.A.5.g AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION Packet Pg. 1176 9.A.5.g AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PUDA-PL-20200002198 &GMPA-PL-20200002204 1, THOMASJACKSON (print name), as PRESIDENT I (title, f applicable) Of EMMANUELEVANGELICAL LUTHERANCHURCH OFNAPLES.INC. (COmpany, If applicable), swear,or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner- applicantF7contract purchaserFland that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 1 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. J. We/I authorize Paula N. C. McMichael, AICP, Robert J. Muihere, FAICP & Richard Yovanovich, Esq. to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above, *Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp, pros. or v, pros. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner" of the named partnership, • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee" • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts��ate>in it are tru J G� Si natureTh mas Jackson, President b to Emmanuel Evangelical La1ti n, Church of Naples, Inc. STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER Tt9he foregoing instrument was acknowleged before me by means of physical presence or ® online notarization this L-ri— day of dui 2�, by (printed name of owner or q a iffer) Such person(s) Notary ublic must check applicable box: Are personally known to me Has produced a Current drivers license Jj Has produced as identi i,ation. p Notary Signature: C1e108-CM-001 Mt55 REV 3141202IJ mp'�Yp�lotiki"ft3rji'alic stater of Florida # Regina Fidler My Commission GG 1935a3 eca� Expires03107/2022 Packet Pg. 1177 9.A.5.g PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM 0 a N d w 7 3 E E O U t L V L J d 7 C R E E Lu Co rn r N O O O O N O N J d Q Packet Pg. 1178 9.A.5.g COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net CEO eY County 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 PROPERTX OW,NERSHI;P DISGIOSURE FORM This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the Q C. rercentage of such interest: Name and Address % of Ownership If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address % of Ownership Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples, Inc. 100% 777 Mooring Line Drive, Naples, FL 34102 If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the rercentage of interest: Name and Address % of Ownership Created 9/28/2017 Page 1 of 3 Packet Pg. 1179 9.A.5.g COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net CAT county 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239)252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the e. f 9. CrlCldl ClIM/W IIrrIIICU PdRrlerb: Name and Address % of Ownership If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the Tracers, stocKnoiaers, DeneTiciaries, or partners: Name and Address % of Ownership Date of Contract: If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or 51 ricers, IT a corporation, partnership, or trust: Name and Address Date subject property acquired ❑ Leased: Term of lease years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Created 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 3 Packet Pg. 1180 9.A.5.g COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliereoy.net CAT T Co1.iKty 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Date of option: Date option terminates: or Anticipated closing date: Any petition required to have Property OwnershipDisclosure, will not be accepted without this form. Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether Individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest -holding party, must be disclosed to Colller County immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition's final public` hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the Information indicated on this checklist is Included In this submittal package, I understand that failure to Include all necessary submittal information may result In the delay of processing this petition. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department ATTN: business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Na es, FL 34104 e OwnerSlgnat e� / Date Agent/Owner Name (please print) Created 9/28/2017 Page 3 of 3 Packet Pg. 1181 9.A.5.g WARRANTY DEEDS 0 a N d r w 7 3 E E O U t L U L J d 7 C R E E LU Co rn r N O O O O N O N J d Q Packet Pg. 1182 This Instrument Prepared Without Opinion By: Dan Bailey, Attorney at Law 2900 14te Street North, Suite #4 Naples, FL 34109 Grantor's Soc Sec #: Grantee's Soc Sec #: 3864165 OR; 4063 PG; 2982 9•A.5.g RICORDID in OIIICIM RICOIDS of COLLIIR CODRTI, IL 06/29/2006 at 02:51IN DHIGHT A. IROCI, CLINK CONS 2650000.00 RIC III 18.50 DOC-.10 18550.00 Retn: ROHIRT V GROTH p 5425 PAU CIRTRAL CT d RAPLIS IL 34109 _ Above This Line For Recording Warranty Deed (Statutory Form - FS 689.02) This Indenture, made this�day of June, 2006, between GLENN E. GRANT, a Married Man, as to Tract 65A, and D. F. MCCARTHY INVESTMENTS H, LLC, AN OHIO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, as to the balance of subject property, Grantor; and MMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH OF NAPLES, INC., A FLORIDA NON-PROFIT COWI ATTON, of the State of Florida, whose post office address is Grantee; Witnesseth: That the said Grantor, for and tij coasSderatjon of the sum of $10.00 and other valuable consideration, to Grantor in hand paid by the said Grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby ickfro•�ledged, hereby grants, bargains and sells to the said Grantee, and Grantee's heirs and assigns forever, the followi 1g described land, to wit: Tract 65A, the North 165 feet dli;c 80 and 81, the South 165 feet of the North 330 feet of Tracts 80 and 81, the North 165 feet of the South 330 feet of Tracts{ and 81, the South 165 feet of Tracts 80 and 81, and all of Tracts 80A, 81A, 96 and 96A, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, UNIT NO! 64;-,according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 7, Page(s) 64, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. <;: j ' 1 < (For Information Only: Property Appraisfr's :' "{ identification Numbers are 39896040009, 39897600008, 39897640000,39897520007,39897560009,'3Q8S,OfQ4,39897600105,39899120007,39899160009). GRANTOR GLENN E. GRANT, WARRANTS A.NAREPKESENTS THAT THE PROPERTY BEING CONVEYED IS NOT THE HOMESTEAD PROPERTY, NOR CO GP6VS, TO THE HOMESTEAD PROPERTY, OF GRANTOR, GRANTOR'S SPOUSE OR GRANTOR'S CHILDRLr&. AI,_OGRANTOR RESIDES AT 2910 70TH Street SW, Naples, FL 34105. To have and to hold the same in fee simple forever. .t Together with any and all tenements, hereditaments and appurte ces thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining including an undivided interest in the common elements llydt cf,common elements. Subject to easements, restrictions, reservations and limitations of record common to thesiib i- (and condominium, if applicable), zoning and other governmental regulations and taxes for the current year and=?;n�quent years. And the said Grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said land, and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. Wherever used herein, the terms "Grantor" and "Grantee" shall include. allthe parties to this instrument and the heirs, legal representatives and assigns of individuals, and the successors and assigns of corporations Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of 1 As to Tract Sign Sign (Seal) Print it /l /T/Hu Print GLENN E. GRANT WITNESS NO. 1 Si Print Daa WITNESS NO.2 As to the balance of the subject property: Sign .A//la,�%C Print Z/NOr4 J. Kg4e WITNESS NO. 1 4 Sign — ,,in, �-1ancn 6Ct0"AC111 D. F. MCCARTHY INVESTMENTS 11, LLC, AN OHIO LIMITED LIABILTY COMPANY, By: Devin F. McCarthy, Its 4nage Si (Seal) Print Michael P. McName . as Attornev-in-fact for Devin F. McCarthy WITNESS NO.2 Packet Pg. 1183 *** OR; 4063 PG; 2983 *** 9•A.5.g WARRANTY DEED PAGE TWO STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this )It"' day of June, 2006, by Glenn E. Grant, who ( ) is/are person y Try to me or who N) has/have produced F as identification. NOTARY PUBLIC: Sign Print a car State of FLORIDA at Large NOTARIAL SEAL) f Commission expires: _.` Commission No.: � - e•,tiv Dan Bailey My Commission D0281 W .��• fawn" Expires February o4 2008 STATE OF OHIO f COUNTY OF 66eiq , The foregoing instrument was aclrnowled ied`b4re me this day of June, 2006, by Michael P. McNamee, as Attomey-in- Fac evin F. McCarthy, Manager of D.F. MCC ARTI Y' INVESTMENTS II, LLC, an Ohio Limited Liability Company, who (✓) i are personally known or who ( ) has/have Producer ! as identification. ff f NOTARY PUBLIC: rrttt " P ' u' J. States 0146 3t Large (NOTARIAL SEAL) LINDA S. KELLEY Notary Public 1n and for the State of Ohio j61y Commission EVrm January 29, 2009 Packet Pg. 1184 INSTR 4576754 OR 4693 PG 2692 RECORDED 6/21/2011 9:13 AM PAGES 2 DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA DOC@.70 $1,505.00 REC $18.50 CONS $215,000.00 Prepared by and return to: Conrad Willkomm, Esq. Law Office of Conrad Willkomm, P.A. 590 11th Street South Naples, FL 34102 239-262-5303 File Number: 11R-468 f Parcel Identification Above This Line For Recording Data] 9.A.5.g Warranty Deed (STATUTORY FORM - SECTION 689.02, F.S) This Indenture made this 17th'd6y'op�June, 2011 between Mario C,astaneda, a married man, joined by his wife, Aleida Perez Fernandez, whose post b,ice address is 3765 22nd Avenue SE, Naples, FL 34117 of the County of Collier, State of Florida, grantor*, and Emmanuel' . gtlical Lutheran Church, a Florida not for profit corporation, whose post office address is 777 Mooring Line Dri e, N41es, FL 34102 of the County of Collier, State of Florida, grantee*, Witnesseth that said grantor, for and in consicfera�i4of the sum of TEN AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($10.00) and other good and valuable considerations to said grantor in>h iid pgo by said grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, and sold to the said grantee; aiici gntee's heirs and assigns forever, the following described land, situate, lying and being in Collier County, Florida, to=w The North 1/2 of Tract 65, Golden Gate recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 64, Public and said grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said land, whomsoever. * "Grantor" and "Grantee" are used for 64, according to the map or plat thereof as c.;County, Florida. the same against lawful claims of all persons requires. Double7imee Packet Pg. 1185 *** OR 4693 PG 2693 *** 9.A.5.g In Witness Whereof, grantor has hereunto set grantor's hand and seal the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and deliour presence: (Seal) Witness Name: E ;Y" {lC 2 4ast Witne ame: Aleida erez Fernandez State of County of The foregoing instrument was acknowledgedJ686reEme this LZ�ay of June, 2011 by Mario Castaneda and Aleida Perez Fernandez, who U are personally known or:,K lade produced a dri as identification. [Notary Seal] NotaryPu �/ � �HT HAINJJJ'�r,, P. imted Name: _ !`2 <R ✓J /IR% vz, N A " �_.. •YYY Commission Expires: f #EE 005960 i� �'. ora bonded\hc��i`•;• pQ;� ,r �. iii ellC, STN' t'f � Warranty Deed (Statutory Form) - Page 2 DoubleTime® Packet Pg. 1186 INSTR 5358104 OR 5354 PG 3154 RECORDED 1/19/2017 9:53 AM PAGES 3 DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA DOC@.70 $5,950.00 REC $27.00 CONS $850,000.00 CONSIDERATION: $850,000.00 Prpared without opinion of title by: Michael L. Michetti Attorney at Law Woods, Weidenmiller, Michetti, Rudnick & Galbraith, PLLC 9045 Strada Steil Court Fourth Floor Naples, FL 34109 239-325-4070 File Number: 15883-001' Parcel Identification No , 4024176004, 39899200008, I,4024170002 Above This Line For Recording p� ('Warranty Deed :,, (STATUTORY FORM - SECTION 689.02, F.S.) This Indenture made this Z/ d, corporation whose post office address is 761 of Florida, grantor*, and Emmanuel Evang whose post office address is 777 Mooring grantee*, Witnesseth that said grantor, for and in consideration,( good and valuable considerations to said grantor in hand 1 has granted, bargained, and sold to the said grantee, and situate lying and being in Collier County Florida to -wit: 9.A.5.g :ern 6 c1— , 201_,:� between JC Drainfield, Inc., a Florida I Blvd., Suite 6, Naples, FL 34104 of the County of Collier, State an Church of Naples, Inc., a Florida not -for -profit corporation :,Naples, FL 34102 of the County of Collier, State of Florida, of TEN AND N0/100 DOLLARS ($10.00) and other (-grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, -irs and assigns forever, the following described land, �r See attached Exhibit "A". • t � , Subject to ad valorem taxes for the year 2017 and subsequer6eare'' o mg, building code and other use restrictions imposed by governmental authority; outstanding oil,, an mineral interests of record if any; and restrictions, reservations and easements common to the subdivi ion;,.pro.vided however, that none of them shall prevent use of the property for residential purposes. TOGETHER WITH all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenahees-tl ereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. F TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above described premises, with the appurt,en`anc s, unto the said grantee, its successors and assigns, in fee simple forever. 9r....•� and said grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said land, and will defend the same against lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. * "Grantor" and "Grantee" are used for singular or plural, as context requires. DoubleTimee Packet Pg. 1187 OR 5354 PG 3155 9.A.5.g In Witness Whereof, grantor has hereunto set grantor's hand and seal the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and deliveredas to both in our presence: State of Florida County of Collier The foregoing instrument was acknowlec Craft, President of JC Drainfield, Inc., a or [j has produced a driver's license as i, [Notary Seal] FRANCES M SCHANER Notar Public - State of Florida Xt Commission # FF 975610 W- My Comm. Expires Jun 26, 2020 Bonded through National Notary Assn. JC Drainfield, Inc., a Flor' a corporation By: ames Craft, President before me this day of 16 by James t, on behalf of the corporation. He ersonally known to me Warranty Deed (Statutory Form) - Page 2 DoubleTimee Packet Pg. 1188 *** OR 5354 PG 3156 *** 9.A.5.g EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description of Property Parcel 1: The West 180 feet of Tract 104, Golden Gate Estates Unit No. 69, according to the map or plat thereof, as recorded in Plat BOA 7, Page 65, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. AND: r� Parcel 2:'" , The West 75 feet of the East15;9 feet of Tract 104, Golden Gate Estates Unit No. 69, according to the map or plat thereof, as rec,aided in Plat Book 7, Page 65, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. AND: Parcel 3: n The East 75 feet of Tract 104, Goldei recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 65, of 11 AND: d �' Parcel 4: Tract 97, Golden Gate Estates Unit No. 64, accord 7, Page 64, of the Public Records of Collier Count; AND: Unit No. 69, according to the map or plat thereof, as rds of Collier County, Florida. map or plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book Parcel 5: Tract 97A, Golden Gate Estates Unit No. 64, according to ,the Book 7, Page 64, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florid plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Packet Pg. 1189 9.A.5.g ADDRESSING CHECKLIST 0 a N d r w 7 3 E E O U t L U L J d 7 C R E E LU Co rn r N O O O O N O N J d Q Packet Pg. 1190 9.A.5.g Colltier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Please complete the following and email to GMD_Addressing@colliergov.net or fax to the Operations Division at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Section at the above address. Form must be signed b_v Addressing personnel prior to pre -application meeting, please allow 3 days for processing. Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Section. PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) ❑ BL (Blasting Permit) ❑ SDP (Site Development Plan) ❑ BD (Boat Dock Extension) ❑ SDPA (SDP Amendment) ❑ Carnival/Circus Permit ❑ SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP) ❑ CU (Conditional Use) ❑ SIP (Site Improvement Plan) ❑ EXP (Excavation Permit) ❑ SIPI (Insubstantial Change to SIP) ❑ FP (Final Plat ❑ SNR (Street Name Change) ❑ LLA (Lot Line Adjustment) ❑ SNC (Street Name Change — Unplatted) ❑ PNC (Project Name Change) ❑ TDR (Transfer of Development Rights) ❑ PPL (Plans & Plat Review) ❑ VA (Variance) ❑ PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) ❑ VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit) ❑ PUD Rezone ❑ VRSFP (Vegetation Removal & Site Fill Permit) ❑ RZ (Standard Rezone) OTHER PUDA LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be attached) Section 19, Township 48S, Range 28E FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) SEE ATTACHED LIST OF FOLIO NUMBERS STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned) • LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right- of-way . SURVEY (copy -needed only for unplatted properties) CURRENT PROJECT NAME (if applicable) PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable) PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existing projects/sites only) SDP_- or AR or PL # Rev. 6/9/2017 Page 1 of 2 Packet Pg. 1191 9.A.5.g co l,eY co1.nty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) Please Return Approved Checklist By: 0 Email ❑ Fax ❑ Personally picked up Applicant Name: Paula N. C. McMichael, AICP, Vice President/Stephanie Karol, Permitting Coordinator Phone: 239-254-2018 Email/Fax: stephaniekarol@hmeng.com Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Division. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number C•:••1�111• Folio Number see attached Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Approved by: ZZ Z Date: 04/29/2021 Updated by: Date: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED Rev, 619/2017 Page 2 of 2 Packet Pg. 1192 9.A.5.g FOLIO NUMBERS 39896040009,39897520007,39897520104,39897560009,39897600008,39897600105, 39897640000,39899120007,39899160009,39899240000,39899200008,40241680003, 40241720002,40241760004,39896000007 Packet Pg. 1193 9.A.5.g AERIAL 0 a N d r w 7 3 E E O U t L U L J d 7 C R E E LU Co rn r N O O O O N O N J d Q Packet Pg. 1194 9.A.5.g IMAGE FROM PLEXEARTH DATED: 2019 LIMITS OF SUBJECT SITE EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL P.N:A. : 2,2, �� 950es,Encor3 110 EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL l LUTHERAN CHURCH CFPUD o. gym.;. � 2,2t N: Pl39 25-2000 Phone�(239)2542000 LUTHERAN CHURCH CFPUD �d.c. �� a 21zt HOLE MONTES Florida Certificate of — REN90N5 o.h COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA °r /'— e� Nor �� ewyeeFAsauaeeassuauEroes AuthorizationNo.1772 AERIAL LOCATION MAP E 2006096, 2006096A OF c 0 .N a� c 0 R Q a Q LL c m E t U r Q 1= t 0 Q Packet Pg. 1195 9.A.5.g SUPPLEMENTAL NARRATIVE 0 a. N d r u w LL. r� 7 3 E E O U t L V L J d 7 C R E E Lu Co rn r N O O O O N O N J d Q Packet Pg. 1196 9.A.5.g Emmanual Lutheran Church Community Facilities and Services Subdistrict and Emmanuel Lutheran Church Community Facilities CFPUD Supplemental Narrative With respect to providing additional justification for increasing the size of the Subdistrict (by 14.2 acres), as we discussed, the 14.2 acres were donated to the Church for the purpose of providing a sufficient campus size to accommodate future growth and the ability to continue and advance the mission of providing both church facilities and a variety of community services on the campus, as the population of this area of the Country continues to grow. The process to begin the addition of the noted parcels to the existing CFPUD and Mission Subdistrict commenced in 2017 with the engagement of DPZ CoDesign to host multiple charrettes resulting in a conceptual plan for the site, based upon "community needs", rather than the "church's needs". Thus, the transformation of the original vision of a megachurch with asphalt parking and church related permissions to a community services site, hosting multiple not -for -profit Collier -based entities bringing their services and expertise to an underserved community. In response to staff s position that the Mobile Food Dispensing Vehicles (MFDV), aka food truck use, can only be supported as an accessory use; respectfully, we disagree, and we intend to keep this use as a permitted principal use subject to the conditions proposed in the CFPUD and LDC Sec. 5.05.16. The intention is that the use may be permitted before the church or other principal uses have been established and the operating hours will not be further limited to those of other principal uses. The ability to host food trucks, whether to serve users of the fields and playgrounds, congregants before or after worship, or the community in conjunction with Meals of Hope or Harry Chapin meets a tremendous need of the community. Food trucks will reduce rather than increase traffic, increase the quality of life, and optimize the flexibility of the site, providing services only when needed rather than being a permanent, fixed investment with high sunk costs. It should also be mentioned that mention that there are several not -for -profit food trucks in Collier County, including those operated by Boys & Girls Club and St Matt's, who have partnered with Emmanuel Lutheran Church at our other campus and anticipate similar on this campus. The proposed food trucks will complement the vision of the Subdistrict of establishing a sense of community and providing a public space for community engagement. H:\2006\2006096A\WP\GMPA\12-15-2023\Supplemental Narrative (1-4-2024).docx Packet Pg. 1197 9.A.5.g EVALUATION CRITERIA 0 a N d r w 7 3 E E O U t L V L J d 7 C R E E Lu Co rn r N O O O O N O N J d Q Packet Pg. 1198 9.A.5.g EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH CFPUD EVALUATION CRITERIA A. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. This is a request to adjust the Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church CFPUD boundary to include a 2.50 acre parcel adjacent to the west and multiple parcels totaling 11.83 acres adjacent to the east; and to allow uses typically ancillary to a church, including but not limited to a multi -purpose building with kitchen, meeting rooms, indoor recreation facilities for church members, social services, and a community park and athletic fields. The subject parcels are designated Estates and located within the Rural Golden Gate Estates Subdistrict on the Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map. There is a companion growth management plan amendment application to re -designate the parcels to be included within the Mission Subdistrict and allow for the proposed uses. The surrounding area is mostly developed with large lot, single-family residences. The site is suitable for the type and pattern of development associated with the proposed uses in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. The intent is to move forward with negotiating a Developer Contribution Agreement (DCA) with Public Utilities staff to extend potable water and wastewater services to the development. Churches and ancillary uses are allowed within Estates designated areas as conditional uses. B. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the county attorney. The property is under the ownership of a single entity as shown by the ownership documents provided. This entity will maintain the continuing operations and maintenance of areas and facilities that are private (not to be provided or maintained at public expense). C. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. (This is to include identifying what Sub -district, policy or other provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that Sub -district, policy or other provision.) 1. Compliance with Golden Gate Area Master Plan 5. Mission Subdistrict Page 1 of 5 H.\2006\2006096A\WP\CFPUD\Resubmittal\Evaluation Criteria (rev 10-28-2021).docx Packet Pg. 1199 9.A.5.g The Mission Subdistrict is located on the south side of Oil Well Road, approximately one quarter mile west of Everglades Boulevard, and consists of 21.72 acres. The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide for churches and related uses, including community outreach. The following uses are allowed: a. Churches. b. Child care centers — must be not -for -profit and affiliated with a church within the Subdistrict. c. Private schools — must be not -for -profit and affiliated with a church within the Subdistrict. d) Individual and family social services (activity centers, elderly or handicapped only; day care centers, adult and handicapped only) — must be not -for -profit and affiliated with a church within the Subdistrict. d. Medical outreach to the community, to include activities such as administering influenza vaccine, checking blood pressure, and conducting blood donation drives — must be not -for -profit and affiliated with a church within the Subdistrict. Soup kitchens and homeless shelters are prohibited in this Subdistrict. The maximum total floor area allowed in this Subdistrict is 90,000 square feet. The maximum height of buildings shall be 30 feet zoned height, except the worship center shall be permitted a zoned height of 35 feet. Development in this Subdistrict shall be designed to be compatible with the existing, and allowed future, development in the surrounding area. In the alternate to the foregoing uses, measures of development intensity, and development standards, this Subdistrict may be developed with single family dwellings in accordance with the Residential Estates Subdistrict. Property adjacent to this Subdistrict shall not qualify for the Transitional Conditional Use. A companion GMPA application has been made to amend the Subdistrict to ensure compliance between the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) and the PUD zoning. Please see the GMPA application. 2. Compliance with additional GMP provisions. Policy 1.1: Unless otherwise permitted in this Growth Management Plan, new or revised uses of land shall be consistent with designations outlined on the Future Land Use Map. Policy 5.6: New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code (Ordinance 04- 41, adopted June 22, 2004 and effective October 18, 2004, as amended). Page 2 of 5 H:\2006\2006096A\WP\CFPUD\Resubmittal\Evaluation Criteria (rev 10-28-2021).doex Packet Pg. 1200 9.A.5.g The proposed uses are compatible with and complementary to the surrounding land uses, which are mostly large lot, single-family residential development. OBJECTIVE 7: Promote smart growth policies, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and adhere to the existing development character of the Collier County, where applicable, and as follows: Policy 7.1: The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. The project fronts on and has access onto a minor arterial roadway (Oil Well Road). There is existing access from Oil Well Road. Policy 7.2: The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals. The CFPUD Master Plan provides access to Oil Well Road through an internal driveway system, consistent with this policy. Policy 7.3: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and/or interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. The interconnection of local streets between developments is also addressed in Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element. The CFPUD is located along the south side of Oil Well Road and is surrounded by a mixture of developed and vacant residential Estates lots. To the east of the CFPUD are two abutting Estates lots, that have frontage on either 31st Ave NE, or Oil Well Road. An interconnection to either one of these individual lots would not be appropriate. Further, as a result of the NIM and comments from County staff, it was found that an interconnection to 3 Pt Ave. NE would not be beneficial to the surrounding neighborhood, thus any proposal for that interconnection has been removed. Policy 7.4: The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. The CFPUD is located in an area that is surrounded by rural, residential Estates lots. The Community Facility PUD has the potential to provide additional services, beyond a place of worship, such as child care facilities, medical offices, and recreational facilities that may serve the surrounding community. Further, walkability, common open spaces, and civic facilities are all envisioned as characteristics of this development. Page 3 of 5 H:\2006\2006096A\WP\CFPUD\Resubmittal\Evaluation Criteria (rev 10-28-2021).docx Packet Pg. 1201 9.A.5.g Policy 7.5: The County shall encourage mixed -use development within the same buildings by allowing residential dwelling units over and/or abutting commercial development. This Policy shall be implemented through provisions in specific Subdistricts in this Growth Management Plan. Not applicable. Policy 7.6: The County shall explore the creation of an urban "greenway" network along existing major canal banks and powerline easements. Not applicable. Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element notes that all rezoning applications shall consider the impacts on the overall system and shall not approve any such request that significantly impacts a roadway segment already operating and/or projected to operate at an unacceptable level of service within the five year planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are approved. There is no significant impact associated with a roadway segment already operating and/or projected to operate at an unacceptable level of service within the five-year planning period. Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element shall require, wherever feasible, the interconnection of local streets between developments to facilitate convenient movement throughout the road network. D. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. The proposed amendment to the existing CFPUD will allow uses typically ancillary to a church, which are compatible with surrounding area. E. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. The proposed CFPUD provides adequate usable open space to serve the development. F. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. All necessary improvements and facilities are already in place to serve this development. G. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. Page 4 of 5 H:\2006\2006096A\WP\CFPUD\Resubnittal\Evaluation Criteria (rev 10-28-2021).docx Packet Pg. 1202 9.A.5.g There are no issues that would limit the ability of the existing CFPUD or the surrounding areas to accommodate the expansion. The project is in accordance with the Estates district density standards set by the LDC and the proposed uses are principal, permitted uses in the existing CFPUD. H. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. The CFPUD has already been reviewed and approved. The requested changes will continue to conform to the LDC regulations, or contains deviations from, where appropriate. Page 5 of 5 H:\2006\2006096A\WP\CFPUD\Resubmittal\Evaluation Criteria (rev 10-28-2021).doex Packet Pg. 1203 9.A.5.g REZONE CRITERIA 0 a N d r w 7 3 E E O U t L U L J d 7 C R E E LU Co rn r N O O O O N O N J d Q Packet Pg. 1204 9.A.5.g EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH CFPUD REZONE CRITERIA 10.02.08 F. Nature of requirements of Planning Commission report. When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations of the Planning Commission to the Board of County Commissioners required in LDC section 10.02.08 E shall show that the Planning Commission has studied and considered the proposed change in relation to the following findings, when applicable: 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan. The proposed change is consistent with the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) goals, objectives, and policies, the Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map (GGFLUM), and the goals, objectives and policies as applicable, of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). 2. The existing land use pattern. The proposed rezone is compatible with the existing land use pattern. Property to the north, south, east, and west is zoned Estates (E) and mostly developed with single-family residences on large lots. There is a Collier County Stormwater Management pond to the north, across Oil Well Road. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. This rezoning will not create an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. Existing boundaries were not illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions in the neighborhood; however, the church is now adding two additional parcels. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary. Changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary, as the church congregation has grown and the proposed changes to the entitlements of the subject property allow for the expansion of the church to better serve the surrounding community. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. Page 1 of 3 H:A2006\2006096A\WP\CFPUD\Resribmittal\Rezone Criteria (rev 10-28-2021).docx Packet Pg. 1205 9.A.5.g The proposed change will not adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood Development standards proposed ensure compatibility with neighboring properties. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development , or otherwise affect public safety. The proposed development scenario results in a PM peals hour trip reduction of 11 trips as compared to the approved development. Please also see the Traffic Impact Statement. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. The site will be designed to meet all County and SFWMD requirements. No drainage problems will be created. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. Development standards and perimeter buffers assure the proposed change will not seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent area. The proposed change is compatible with surrounding land uses and will not adversely affect property values in the adjacent area. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. The proposed change will not be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. The proposed change will not constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. There are no substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning, however, the church congregation has grown and the proposed changes to the entitlements of the subject property allow for the expansion of the church to better serve the surrounding community. Page 2 of 3 H:\2006\2006096A\WP\CFPUD\Restibmittal\Rezone Criteria (rev 10-28-2021).docx Packet Pg. 1206 9.A.5.g 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county. The change suggested is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county 15. Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. It is not impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use; however, these parcels abut the CFPUD that is being expanded. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration required to make the property usable for the uses under the proposed zoning is typical of and not different from similar development in Collier County. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code ch. 106, art. II], as amended. There is availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, to serve the project. The intent is to move forward with negotiating a Developer Contribution Agreement (DCA) with Public Utilities staff to extend potable water and wastewater services to the development. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. To be determined by the BCC. Page 3 of 3 H:\2006\2006096A\WP\CFPUD\Resubmittal\Rezone Criteria (rev 10-28-2021).docx Packet Pg. 1207 9.A.5.g DEVIATION AND JUSTIFICATION 0 a N d r w 7 3 E E O U t L V L J d 7 C R E E Lu Co rn r N O O O O N O N J d Q Packet Pg. 1208 9.A.5.g DEVIATION & JUSTIFICATION EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH COMMUNITY FACILITIES PUD REVISED NOVEMBER 17, 2022 Deviation No. 1 was previously approved. Deviation No. 2 seeks relief from LDC Table 5.04.05 F.1. Temporary Event Time Limits to allow sports, religious, and community events for a maximum of 42 event days per calendar year. Justification: The applicant is requesting that the time limit for temporary events be extended to 42 days (rather than 28 days). The subject property is larger than a typical church campus (36 acres) and has access directly from an arterial. Substantial setbacks and buffers will be provided to adjacent residential properties, limiting potential impacts to neighboring sites. While the principal use of the site is a church, the intention is to create a community campus that will include education and social services and the additional 14 days for religious and community events will allow them more flexibility to better serve the community. H:A2006\2006096A\WP\CFPUD\2nd Resubmittal\Deviation and Justification (rev 11-17-2022).docx Packet Pg. 1209 9.A.5.g BOUNDARY SURVEY 0 a N d r w 7 3 E E O U t L V L J d 7 C R Lu Co rn r N O O O O N O N J d Q Packet Pg. 1210 9.A.5.g OIL ------------- _—p---_---------------YL—� -Ar•_ _ WELLRD__s2YJ�Tl-M-3ddess�T S �e1Grt1=0F=WAT-YRRIES__—r=-_ GRAPHIC—_"- — _________---- ----- - — -----"------------- _____ �t/RC __ __________ -- 0.RA703 PG.2124 __ ___ ___ _ ROW TN(E �...�.. --- —— �_�_�-- - ---- -- • . . urn. xoP n -1 —__— - - - -- - _ __—_-__ WJ:— _— ---_-_- 6 p S Bff3'1 330.50' (M) eI ) N 89'43'ta E 784.35' (M) 6942 _ 80A s Bff31-12- E 784.33' (R) "O R� N asses GOLDEN GlE ESTATES �65.64A� U \ P.g ), P0664 g 1 A 96A E 1 12A 64A P.B. NIT 1. PG. 64 O 97A GOLDEN GTE ESTATES tTI10IIC Tqn GOLDEN GTE ESTATES rt N0. 64 G.OlOEN GIE ESTATES GOLDEN GlE ESTATES GOLDEN GTE ESTATES UNIT N0. 6t N\+mt uus UNIT NO. 64 0 N0. 64 UNIT NO. 64 P.B. ]. PO. fit ""'+ter P.K. B. ]. PG. 64 PB. 7. PG. 6t P.B. ]. 6t Ali p F UNE BEARING DISTANCE L1 N 89'49'23" E 129.22' a e i 12 S 76'43'58" E 51.32' E = L3 N 89'42'44" E 225.30' En 6sssrtM d L4 S O0'16'16" E 15.93, y ? L5 N 89'43'45" E 62.00' uS aea� V A C A N T [ 16 N 00'16'23" W 15.95' e8 p L7 N 89'28'01- E 19.32' LB N 76'10'38" E 51.42' L9 N 00'26'55" W 20.99' N 1/2 65 80 81 96 97 112 64 GOIDEN GTE ESTATES UNITNO. 61 CALDUN GTE ESTATE$ P.B. ), PG. 61 WIDDI GlE ESTATES GOLDEN GTE ESTATES UNIT NO. 64 GOLDEN GTE ESTATES PUNT NO. 66 PB 7N�. fis WLOEVN GTE ESTATES UNIT ND. 61 N 89'40'S0' W 330.00' (M) .B. ]. PG. 4 .. . 64 eIT NO, 64 P.B. 7. PG. G P.B. ], PG. 6t S B9'36's T- w 330.0)' ( ) uN sal P.B. ). PG. 64 a $& GOLDEN GTE ESTATES U NIT K. 64 i� c P.B ]. PG. 6{ uc m£ PROPERtt DESCRIPTION: Fm as aun.c® ue tl TRACT 654 THE NORTH 165 FEET OF TRACTS SOAND 81. THE SOUTH 165 ug 2 0 So FEET OFTHE NORTH3b FEETOFTRACTS60AND81,THENORTH165FEET w OF THE60UTH330FEET TRAC$WMD81.TNESOUTH165FEETOF E a`°^ • TRACTS 60 AND91ANDA OFT CTS8 .B1A96.98A.9TAND9 kTHE G z NORTN120F TRACT 65, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES. UNIT NO. N. ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PNT THEREOF AS REGARDED IN FIAT BOOK 7. PAGE(E) 64. PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. N 8ff10'51 W 990.00' (R) LESSAND EKCEPT THE NORTH 21.00FEETTHEREOFANDO.R. BOOK4703 5 Bff33'05' W 990.00' IN) ' 33 PAGE 2424-ROW TALE. LOEN GTE ESTATES M AND UNIT N0. 69 P.B. 7. K. 65 LOT IN. GOD— DATE R ET THEREOFASRELORDEDINPIATBOOVATPPAGCE �T ROFTHE UC BL g ��gqg r�S ✓? i RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 89 fy t EaiE NOTES: ll LEGEND > If pg� (6 g� 'qo �'!< 105 PROPERTYAREA 35.9ACRES MOREOR LESS. ME AL PIPE GOLDEN CATS ESTATES CONCRETE MONUMENT A. N0. 69 _ F p- GOLDEN GTE ESTATES THISPROPERTY CSUBJEOTTO EASEMENTS. RESERVATIONS OR sFTCjp �LW OLO FOLIO NNL R A. fis dFg IT Na 69 RESTRICTIONS OFREORD. ON ROO W/CAP L8 1772 P.B. EOP 0—OF PAOENENT m£ - BEARINGS SHO- HEREON REFER TO NORTH LINE OF SECTION 19i6-28. Er ED11 OFWAhR o 0 10 4 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIW AS BEING N.89.4— W.. MEASURED. xOao OOKi PoxER POLE OLY GOLDEN — ATES AESTRACT OF TITLE HAS NOT BEEN REVIEWED BY SURVEYOR. M CONCRETE PIPE UNIT N0. 69 SETIRaNOLx00 W/CAP LB I)72 F. 65 THIS SURVEY IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND ORIGINAL TOS SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. In TEIEP..I PEDESTAL TOS TOE OF AWE CERTIFIEDTO: EMMANUELEVANGELCALWTHERANCHURCHOF (R) ASUREO NAPLES, INC. EOOP �( SON I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS BOUNDARY SURVEY OF THE HEREON DESCRIBED PROPERTY WAS SURVEYED UNDER MY DRECTION ON E N-017. 1 FURTHER CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY MEETSTHE M cw w13 -- --- ----------------- STANGRpS OFPRACTCEFORLANDSURV17-ILF ING IN TNESTATEOF FLORIDA PURSUANT TOCNAPTER 61G17S,iAC. I SIN—.—W E 330.00' (P) I ------------- HOLE MO YES. INC. ------- CERTIFICATE OF pUTHORIZATCN NUMBER LBIP2 90 ON, BMJONHn1an l �6rP�•le� GOLDEN GTE ESTATES 1 103 106 GOLDEN GTE ESTATES UNIT NO, fi9 lMR N0. . 69 fis • GOLDEN GTE ESTATES L Depenmem, S 16 P.B. 7, PC. 68 P.B. ). PGUNIT N0. 69 ep6nMlronphmeng<om £ y ( SIP, -F e 0�/ i Da1c 2o3ot t.tl la:lo2) *�*..�R.ORIOA BY .OSYp' P.—p627B4 �xnirc JOHN J. HILTON STATE OF FLORIDA IDr v,Wp N11NB3f PA.TT T133-83 �1'-OS-202G 950 Encore) y H-1427 a® TIRE pEpna� G.H 11 O9 2020 Naples, FL.34110 EMMANUAL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH ,�p,�,„p. RRE BOUNDARY SURVEY sTALa,Ranw s,.D a<Rd.] Ph^00:(239) 25a2000 O6.D96 ® FMnd Ce186Pate Rf 4 BUNSEow6mDE 1 1 HOLEMONTES OF NAPLESS INC. uro 9uNd. -,.al-Roe DlaNIass.RANms.Rm+Eracs AMmnaalloR N0. nrz �� aea9oxs A 19-48-28 Packet Pg. 1211 9.A.5.g ENVIRONMENTAL DATA 0 a N d r w 7 3 E E O U t L U L J d 7 C R E E LU Co rn r N O O O O N O N J d Q Packet Pg. 1212 9.A.5.g EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH OF NAPLES ENVIRONMENTAL DATA REPORT _ N • p 1 1 �� ire �— REVISED APRIL 19, 2022 COLLIER ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, INC. 3211 68TH STREET SW NAPLES, FL 34105 239-263-2687 Packet Pg. 1213 9.A.5.g 3.08.00 Environmental Data Purpose As per requirements in LDC Sections 3.08.00 and questions in the CU Checklist Preparation Of Environmental Data Preparation of Environmental Data, Environmental Data Submittal Requirement shall be prepared by an individual with academic credentials and experience in the area of environmental science or natural resource management. Academic credentials and experience shall be a bachelor's or higher degree in one of the biological sciences with at least two years of ecological or biological professional experience in the State of Florida Qualifications of Environmental Consultant Collier Environmental Consultants Inc. 2/96 - Present 3211 68 h Street SW Naples, Florida 34105 Marco A. Espinar- Biologist Resume included as an exhibit. Environmental Data. The following shall be submitted where applicable to evaluate projects. A) Wetlands i) Identify on Current Aerial / the location of all Collier County / SFWMD Jurisdictional wetlands according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System FLUCFCS A FLUCFCS map and vegetation inventory has been included. The site consists of approximately 36 acres. The site consists primarily of pasture lands. These are Golden Gate Estates lots. The site also has three borrow pits two of which may have been for cattle grazing. These parcels were cleared decades ago, prior to any Land Development Codes. The site is FLUCC'ed as 211 Pasture. In addition, there are a few borrow pits. These parcels do not contain any native habitat. There are a few pockets of native secondary growth. There is an area labeled 411 Pine flatwoods. This pocket is vegetated with Slash pines, cabbage palm, palmetto and Brazilian pepper. Aerials depicting FLUCCS codes, and a vegetation inventory are included as exhibits. Packet Pg. 1214 9.A.5.g B) Listed Species and Bald Eagle Nests and Nest Protection Zones i) Provide a wildlife survey for the nests of bald eagle and for listed species known to inhabit biological communities similar to those existing on site. The survey shall be conducted in accordance with the guidelines or recommendations of the FFWCC and the USFWS. Survey times may be reduced or waived where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low as determined by the FFWCC and USFWS. Where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low, the survey time may be reduced or waived by the County Manager or designee. Wildlife Listed Species Study (LDC 10.02.3.A.2.m) A brief examination of these parcels found no listed plant and/or animals on site. The site does not provide any functional habitat for wildlife. A listed species study was conducted and is attached. No listed vertebrate species were found. The site is fenced and cross fenced and surrounded by roadway and single- family lots. This limits any animal movement. Any utilization is limited to birds and small mammals. This project site is in secondary panther zone. This project meets the Objective of CCME Objective 7.1 The area proposed to be impacted consists of lower grade habitat. No listed species should be impacted by this development. CCME OBJECTIVE 7.1: Direct incompatible land uses away from listed animal species and their habitats. (The County relies on the listing process of State and Federal agencies to identify species that require special protection because of their endangered, threatened, or species of special concern status. Listed animal species are those species that the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission has designated as endangered, Packet Pg. 1215 9.A.5.g ii) Provide Listed Plants identified in LDC Section 3.04.03 See Attached Vegetation List / FLUCCS Code Map iii) Wildlife Management Plans in accordance with LDC Section 3.04.00 See Attached Listed Species Study. A Black bear management plans may be required at the time of SDP. C) Native Vegetation Preservation i) For Sites or Portions of Sites Cleared of Native Vegetation or in Agricultural Use: This parcel has been cleared and was in prior agricultural use. A historical aerial dated 1984 and 1995 has been included. ii) Identify on a current aerial the acreage, location and community types of all upland and wetland habitats on the project site, according to the FLUCFCS system and provide a legend foe each of the FLUCFS codes identified. Aerials and overlay information must be legible at the scale provided. Provide calculations for the acreage of native vegetation required to be retained on site. Include the above referenced calculations and aerials on the SDP or PPL. In a separate report, demonstrate how the preserve criteria pursuant to LDC section 3.05.07 have been meet. Location Maps / Aerials (LDC 10.02.3.A.2.m) Aerials and location maps have been provided. The Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples consists of approximately 36 acres and is located in Section 19, Township 48, Range 28, in Collier County. This project is located just west of the intersection of Oil well Road and Everglades Blvd. This property was rezoned by Ordinance 11-23 and an insubstantial change to the PUD was approved by HEX Decision 2015-49. The CFPUD allows for 90,000 sf of uses, including a 1,000 - seat church and related social services, a 300 - person day care facility, job training and vocational rehabilitation services, a 450 - person private school or, as an alternative to the church and its ancillary uses, development of ten (10) single family dwelling units. Accessary uses allowed include recreational facilities and garden plots. The site has been developed with an athletic field in the northwest corner. The proposed amendment adds approximately 14 acres to the PUD and allows church - related uses over the entire acreage of 36 acres. The prosed intensity would be reduced from a 300 - person daycare to a 200 - person daycare and add up to 3,600 sq ft of Packet Pg. 1216 9.A.5.g medical office and 300 university/college students. The other development parameters remain the same. There is a companion Growth Management Plan Amendment to add the additional acreage to the Mission Subdistrict of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. See Attached Location Maps, Vegetation Maps / FLUCCS Maps Native Vegetation Calculation (LDC3.05.07.A.) 3.05.07 Preservation Standards This site does not have any native habitat. The removal of native vegetation happened prior to any development regulation. This site was at one time cleared and farmed in row crops. It was then utilized for cattle grazing. These are now platted Golden Gate Estate lots. Historical aerials have been provided. There is some secondary growth that has occurred on site. This is primary along the outer boundaries of the project. One such area is along Oil Well Road. This is an area with Slash pines (411). The midstory also has some palmetto and cabbage palms. This (411) is approximately 0.26 acres in size. This area will be preserved. This will be consistent with Goal 6 of Collier County GMP's Objective 6.1 Protect native communities through the application of minimum preservation requirements. Clearly identify the location of all preserves The site has no native habitat. Soil Ground Water Sampling Natural Site This site is not near any well Fields. An exhibit showing Collier County well field protection zones as been included. Packet Pg. 1217 9.A.5.g "UALIFICATIONS 0 a N d r u w LL. r� 3 E E O U t L U L J d 7 C R LU Co rn r N O O O O N O N J d Q Packet Pg. 1218 9.A.5.g Marco A. Espinar 3211 68" St SW Naples, Fl 34105 EDUCATION Bilingual: English & Spanish Office: 239-263-2687 Home 239-263-2747 Cardinal Mooney High School Diploma 1980 Sarasota, Florida Manatee Junior College AA Degree 1982 Bradenton, Florida Biology University of South Florida BS Degree 1990 Tampa, Florida Biology Completed USF Cooperative Education Program April 1988 USF Undergraduate Research - USF 1985 Apalachicola Archaeological Expedition & Research - Lab Coordinator of Fauna Identification from Archeological Sites - Studies of Seagrass Beds (Thalassic testudintan) in Upper Tampa Bay, Florida - Growth Rates of Marine Algae ( Gracilaria tikvahiae, G. verrucosa, G. deblis ) Port Manatee, Florida EMPLOYMENT HISTORY & EXPERIENCE Collier Environmental Consultants Inc. Naples, Florida 2/96 - Present Environmental Permitting, Planning Vegetation Inventory Mitigation & Monitoring Plans Threatened and Endangered Species Survey Licensed Agent Gopher Tortoise Permitting, Testing, Relocation Owner & Environmental Planning / Biologist Exotic Plant Removal / Poisoning Mitigation Plantings Jurisdictional Determination Environmental Impact Statements Red Cockaded Woodpecker Survey UMAM Analysis BP- Natural Resource Advisor - Deepwater Horizon MS Canyon 252 Oil Spill Gulfport, Mississippi - Dauphin Island, Alabama - Pensacola, Florida Packet Pg. 1219 9.A.5.g Turrell & Associates, Inc. Naples, Florida 2/94 - 12/95 Environmental Permitting, Planning Threatened and Endangered Species Survey Environmental Impact Statements Senior Environmental Planner Supervision of Staff Review Staff Reports South Florida Water Management District Environmental Analyst Fort Myers, Florida 2/93 - 8/93 Dredge & Fill Permit Review Surface Water Permit Review Collier Count-,, Government, Development Services Environmental Specialist II Naples, Florida 10/90 — 2/93 Site Development Plan Compliance Planned Unit Development Compliance Site Drainage Inspections Southwest Florida Water Management District Tampa, Florida 9/87 — 10/90 Landscape Inspections Environmental Enforcement Field Services Technician As -Built Inspections of Storm Water System - Engineering, Survey Surface and Ground Water Permit Compliance Well Construction & Abandonment Inspections Southwest Florida Water Management District (CO-OP) Environmental Scientists 1 Brooksville. Florida 1/86 - 9/87 Wetland Vegetation Studies At Major Well Fields 'rater Quality Sampling & Testing PROFIESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS Southwest Florida Association of Environmental Professionals, Member Elected to very First Govenung Board and served 2 terms, served on founding association — Bylaws Committee 4 Appointed by the Board of County Commissioners and Served on the Collier County Environmental Advisory Board Appointed by the Board of County Conunissioners and Currently Serving on the Development Services Advisory Committee Packet Pg. 1220 9.A.5.g LOCATION MAPS 0 a N d r u w LL. r� 3 E E O U t L U J d 7 C R E E LU Co rn r N O O O O N O N J d Q Packet Pg. 1221 9.A.5.g a R Palm^lto Ridge. liigh SchM :..—.—_— f Collie' County 7,rImn Shenfrs OfOce _ �IE Golden Gate Estates Substa�n District 4 1 } a 0 ai _ �h .. !. rr[]. --- � .R1MtlNG BuWevartl `Cii.L1 RnrMaI1� ulevak - ftnni:.A floulevrtd - /SParmacy � � GPl { � sl � fI f E ai Sabal Pnlrn Elommntory 1Mh avenue Nrxe,umt i MaDWlse 2020 Copyright 2020 MapWise, Inc. All rights reserved, www.mapwise.com. This map is Informational only. No representation is made or warranty given as to its content. User assumes all risk of use. MapWise and its suppliers assume no responsibility for any losses resulting from such use. LOCATION Labels Drawing Points Drawing Lines Drawing Polygons Drawing Selected Custom Parcels County Boundaries Vt. 0 045 1 1.5 mi Packet Pg. 1222 9.A.5.g TLUCCS MAP / VEGETATION INVENTORY 0 a N d r u w LL. r� 3 E E O U t L U L J d 7 C R E E LU Co rn r N O O O O N O N J d Q Packet Pg. 1224 9.A.5.g FLUCCS CODE AND VEGETATION INVENTORY FLUCCS CODE (Description) Common Name Scientific Name Ill Single Family Home Currently used as an office 180 Recreational Play field 211 Pasture (Cleared) Indicator Status This is the dominate habitat on site. This is an area totally cleared and was historically farmed in row crops. The clearing occurred prior to any regulation. The area is currently vegetated with disturbed and pioneer plant species. There are scattered pockets of cabbage palms, palmetto and Brazilian pepper. This area is fenced and cross -fenced and at one point this was used for cattle grazing. There are a few Slash pines, cabbage palms and ear leaf acacia along the perimeter with Oil Well Road. Slash pine Pinus elliotti FACW Ear leaf acacia Acacia auriculiformis Exotic Palmetto Serona repens FACU Running oak Quercus pumila UPL Live oak Quercus virginiana FACU Myrsine Myrsine floridana FAC Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolius Exotic Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto FAC wax myrtle Myrica cerifera FAC+ beakrush Rhynchospora microcarpa FACW+ Bahiagrass Paspalum notatum FACU Sandspur Cenchrus echinatus FAC Broom sedge Andropogon glomeratus FACW Sedge Cyperus ligularis FACW Dog Fennel Eupatorium capillifolium FACU pennywort Hydrocotyle spp. FACW mat lippa Phyla nodiora FACW Guineagrass Panicum maximum FAC- Lantana Lantana camara FACU Ragweed Ambrosia artemisiifolia FACU Whitehead broom Spermacoce verticillata FAC Caesar weed Urena lobata FACU Chocolate weed Melochia corchorifolia FAC Packet Pg. 1225 9.A.5.g 411 Pine Flatwoods This is a small 0.26 acre habitat located along Oil Well Road. This area is vegetated with Slash pines with palmetto as ground cover. Other species such as cabbage palms are also present 742 Borrow Area Other Surface Waters This are consisting of three different borrow pits. One is next to the current parking. The other two were at one time used as cattle ponds. Torpedo grass Panicum repens Nuisance Cattails Typha spp OBL Carolina willow Salix caroliniana OBL primrose willow LuAdgia peruviana OBL 8144 Roads and Highway — Oil Well Road INDICATOR STATUS - Obligate (OBL), Facultative wet plants (FACW), Facultative plants (FAC), Upland (UPL) Packet Pg. 1226 9.A.5.g 0 a N d r u w LL. r� 3 E E O U t L U L J d 7 C R LU Co rn r N O O O O N O N J d Q Packet Pg. 1227 9.A.5.g SOILS 0 a N d r u w LL. r� 3 E E O U t L U L J d 7 C R LU Co rn r N O O O O N O N J d Q Packet Pg. 1228 9.A.5.g COLLIEP. COUNTY SOIL'LEGEND REVISED 1/90 H_ YAMATAKI HYDRIC H 2 HOLOPAW FS, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM H 3 MALABAR. FS. H 4 CHOBEE, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM AND DANIA MUCKS -DEPRESSIONAL H 6 RIVIERA;-LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM-COPELAND FS 7 IMMOKALEE FS 8 MYAKKA FS 10 OLDSMAR FS, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM 11 HALLANDALE FS H 14 PINEDA FS, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM 15 POMELLO FS 16 OLDSMAR FS H 17 BASINGER FS H 18 RIVIERA FS, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM 20 FT. DRUM- AND-MA.LAgAF:-HIGH-. FS 21 BOCA FS H H 22 CHOBEE, WINDER AND GATOR-SOILS, DEPRESSIONAL 23 HOLOPAW AND OKEELANTA SOILS DEPRESSIONAL H 25 BOCA, RIVIERA, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM AND COPELAND FS DEPRESSIONAL H 27 HOLOPAW FS H 28 PINEDA AND RIVIERA FS 29 WABASSO FS H 31 HILOLO LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM, JUPITER AND MARGATE SOILS 32 URBAN LAND 33 URBAN LAND 4ULOPAW BASINGER COMPLEX 34 URBAN LAND IMMOKALEE OLDSMAR LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM COMPLEX 35 URBAN RAND AQUENTS COMPLEX ORGANIC SUBSTRATUM 36 UDORTHENTS SHAPED 37 TUSCAWILLA FS 38 URBAN LAND MATLACHA LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM BOCA COMPLEX 39 SATELLITE FS H 40 DUBBIN AND WULFERT MUCKS = 41 URBAN LAND SATELLITE COMPLEX 42 .. CANAVERAL BEACHES ASSOCIATION H 43 WINDER, RIVIERA-1 LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM ---AND CHOBEE SOILS DEPRESSIONAL - 45 PAOLA FS (1-18 percent slopes) H 48 PENNSUCCO SOIL (marl prairie) H 49 HALLANDALE AND BOCA FS (slough) 50 OCHOPEE FSL, PRAIRIE (marl) " ... _ H 51 OCHOPEE FSL ' H 52 KESSON MUCK FREQUENTLY FLOODED H H 53 ESTERO AND PECKISH SOILS FREQIIENTLY_FLOODED 54 JUPIT.ER BOCA COMPLEX H 5"6 BASINGER FS, OCCASIONALLY -FLOODED Packet Pg. 1229 9.A.5.g SOILS Labels Drawing Points Drawing Lines Drawing Polygons Drawing Selected Custom Parcels Streets OSM Hybrid County Boundaries Jp, ni Parcel Outlines Soils Boundaries Copyright 2020 MapWise, Inc. All rights reserved, www,mapwise.com. This map is informational only. No representation is made or warranty given as to Its content. User assumes all risk of use. MapWise and its suppliers assume no responsibility for any losses resulting from such use. 0 3d0 680 1020ft Packet Pg. 1230 9.A.5.g HISTORICAL AERIAL 0 a N d r u w LL. r� 3 E E O U t L U L J d 7 C R E E LU Co rn r N O O O O N O N J d Q Packet Pg. 1232 9.A.5.g Copyright 2020 MapWise, Inc. All rights reserved. www,mapwise.com. This map is Informational only. No representation Is made or warranty given as to Its content. User assumes all risk of use. MapWise and its suppliers assume no responsibility for any losses resulting from such use. HISTORICAL AERIAL 1995 Labels Drawing Points Drawing Lines Drawing Polygons Drawing Selected Custom Parcels County Boundaries A/ Parcel Outlines 0 340 680 1020 it Packet Pg. 1234 9.A.5.g SITE / MASTER PLAN 0 a N d r u w LL. r� 3 E E O U t L U L J d 7 C R E E LU Co rn r N O O O O N O N J d Q Packet Pg. 1235 OR 4703 PG. 2424 -- - - - - -- — - — - 29yh1deTyPe,01 - — - — - — - — - -FLONTAKE Landscape Ijuffer-% -,YRVRO Z5'Wl0a'::kHbSCX ------------ - - - - - - - - - - - 61 HIGH WALL -ReL or - - - 20' Wide 76 SETBACK ff! Type 'D' Sp 75'SETRACK dscap -1i6 Private Roadway LAKE IU - ffer Easement 25'Wide Type'B Potential Food Truck Landscape Buffer 6'HIGH WALL Parking Area 75 SETBACK ❑ liar I 1 LAKE ;s 25'Wide Type'B' Landscape Buffer within 75' wide Setback PRESERVE 75'SETBACK LAKE (0.26 AC.t) Zoned; E Estates (Land Use is Single Fa f7*71 POTENTIAL FOOD TRUCK and Vacant) A , / PARKING AREA 10 ., El to E] Zoned: F Estates LAND USE SUMMARY L - (Land Use is Vacant) in Acres Percentage Landscape Buffer 751 SETBACK T 26 wide Type'B'— Development Area 23.58 65.65% Min 75'wide Setback_ Landscape Buffers/ Setback 5.07 14.11% Q Zoned: E Estates (LandUse is Single Family and Sports Fields 1.32 3.67% Development Intensity per Sec. D of CFPUD Lake 5.69 15.81 % Preserve Area 0.26 0,75% • Maximum total floor area = 90,000 s.f. SETBACK E Total 35.92 100.00% Maximum Principal Structure Height • Zoned height = 30 feet maximum 715'SETBACK • Actual height = 38 feet maximum for all structures Minimum Open Space Required/ Provided: other than Worship Center 35.92 Acres X 30% = 10.78 Acres Worship Center Im %9 Preserves can be used to meet L.D.0 required landscape . Zoned height = 35 feet maximum buffer in accordance with section 2.B of the CFPUD. . Actual height = 42 feet maximum Lakes shown are conceptual and may change during the Deviations N 3;g SDP process. F-1❑I See list of Requested Deviations Minimum Native Vegetation Required/ Provided = - 1.7 Acres x 15% = 0.261 Acres NOTES: All stacking shall occur within the development with no Impacts on Oil Well Road for all uses. 315TA NE wu -L WJN.EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL A.S- go Na90 sE, rFwLre34W1 a1O y 16096CMP06 4637-1 Ph—(23912542LUTHERAN CHURCH ;;to, F,fldaCaWkWeof C.F.P...D. MASTER PLAN '' Authorutonlo.1772 1106096AI or Packet Pg. 1236 9.A.5.g The Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples LISTED SPECIES SURVEY Collier County, Florida January 2021 Prepared By: Collier Environmental Consultants, Inc. 3211 68' Street SW Naples, Florida 34105 (239) 263 - 2687 Packet Pg. 1237 9.A.5.g INTRODUCTION: This report is an account of a Listed wildlife and plants species survey recently performed on 36 acre tract called The Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples. Its purpose is to identify and describe key habitats and report any listed species using the site that would be at risk due to possible future development actions on the site. This survey and report is based on fieldwork performed during January 2021. DESCRIPTION: The Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples consists of approximately 36 acres and is located in Section 19, Township 48, Range 28, in Collier County. This parcel is located just west of the intersection of Oil Well Road and Everglades Blvd. These are numerous Golden Gate Estates lots. The following is a habitat breakdown. See Exhibit 41 - Location Map FLUCCS HABITAT ill Single Family Home 180 Recreational 211 Pasture 411 Pine Flatwoods 742 Burrow Pit 8144 Roadway LISTED SPECIES SURVEY: The required survey for a Listed Species Survey calls for a survey covering 100 % of the site, at prescribed transect distances per site acreage. Such a survey was conducted in January 2021. Established transects were oriented north - south and east - west and superimposed on an aerial map of the site. The site was examined via straight and meandering transects with periodic stationary observations. These transects were conducted Early morning (0730 - 1000), mid -day (1100 - 1500) and late -day (1500 - 1800) time periods. This survey was conducted daily for several days. Some transects were interrupted by seasonal rains. All possible species of plants and animals listed by state and federal agencies were noted. In addition, to the transects walked stationary observation was periodically utilized. Careful observations noting calls, tracks, scat, roosting and nest sites were conducted. Packet Pg. 1238 9.A.5.g RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Listed Flora Refer to Exhibit # 2 - Cumulative Plant List Listed Fauna A description of the wildlife found onsite is provided below. Refer to Exhibit # 3 - Wildlife Species Observed Key Species Discussion: Taking into account the location and condition of the property and State and Federal listed species that could be found on or around the site include: Florida Black Bear No individuals were observed during this survey even though Black bears are known to inhabit the general area. Special attention was given for signs such as scraps, tracks and scat. This mammal has a large home range and is known to inhabit the area. Bonneted Bat The Florida bonneted bat is the largest species of bat in Florida. Previously known as the Florida (Wagner's) mastiff bats these bats were reclassified as a separate species unique to Florida. The species can grow to a length of 6.5 inches with a wingspan of 20 inches. This is a flying mammal free to traverse great distances. This parcel has very few trees and/or cabbage palms. During this survey trees were examined for cavities. None were found. This project is not anticipated to negatively impact the species. Florida Panther No individuals have been documented utilizing this project site or identified during this survey. This species does have a large home range and is known to inhabit Golden Gate Estates and surrounding areas. The site is located within the Secondary Panther Zone. Gopher Tortoise This site does offer some areas of suitable habitat for Gopher tortoise. Searches were keyed in areas with spoil material (mound). However, no signs or burrows were Packet Pg. 1239 9.A.5.g identified on the subject parcels. CONCLUSION: Transects were walked throughout the entire parcel. Stationary observations were also done through prime habitat areas. All tansects were walked at varying times from post - dawn & mid -day to pre -sunset hours. This site has no native habitat. This parcel is entirely cleared. This was a historical farm field, later used for cattle grazing. This site is extremely limited as wildlife habitat / utilization. The site is surrounded by single family homes and a busy roadway. These parcels are also fenced and cross fenced. These fences impede wildlife movement. All these limitations hinder wildlife utilization and movement. Signs of small animal usage such as armadillo were readily visible. Several species of songbirds were seen traversing the site. No listed animal species or signs thereof were identified on the property. Packet Pg. 1240 9.A.5.g Vertebrates - Threatened, Endangered and Species of Special Concern Species Present Absent Black bear x Florida panther x Everglades mink x Big Cypress Fox squirrel x Bonneted Bat x Indigo snake x American alligator x Gopher tortoise x Gopher Frog x Southeastern American kestrel x Red -Cockaded woodpecker x Florida Scrub Jay x Wood stork x Snail kite x Bald eagle x Limpkin x Osprey x White ibis x Tricolored heron x Snowy egret x Reddish egret x Little blue heron x Listed Vegetation Tillandsia spp. x Packet Pg. 1241 9.A.5.g I I 0 CC, II (' WrncAssfor liosi x a{E i; .�:.. Pal mall. Ndyc 1 •, lii h Srtexu a 35k - l ■. _ Collier Coll ty 7-E10ron scar. Office I� 1 Golden Gaze C ales Sdbstat on Gi 1rid 4 o C. I� � Rnnir.IlWulet'tild .- BnnlL4 Bn�duvm:l .i'�■ ,.: rrn1n119aulanvd CCtLLIER I Is Pharmacy g II 2 "rj II $� cabal Palm Eles�oniary {5{Il nYcnVa lM,M1hnn\r = �� Scltox nl i II i1 �.I rl ,I Ma Wise 2020 Copyright 2020 MapWlse, Inc. All rights reserved. www.mapwise.com. This map is informational only, No representation is made or warranty given as to Its content. User assumes all risk of use. MapWlse and its suppliers assume no responsibility for any losses resulting from such use. LO CATI O N Labels Drawing Points Drawing Lines Drawing Polygons Drawing Selected Custom Parcels County Boundaries U 0.5 1 1.5 mi Packet Pg. 1242 9.A.5.g Copyright 2020 MapWise, Inc. All rights reserved. www,mapwise,com. This map is informational only. No representation is made or warranty glven as to Its content. User assumes all risk of use, MapWise and its suppliers assume no responsibility for any losses resulting from such use. LOCATION Labels Drawing Points Drawing Lines Drawing Polygons Drawing Selected Custom Parcels Streets MapWise County Boundaries n/ Parcel Outlines 0 680 1360 2040 ft Packet Pg. 1243 9.A.5.g 0 a N d r u w LL. 7 E E O U t L U L J d 3 C R W 00 CD r N O O O O N O N J d Q Packet Pg. 1244 9.A.5.g FLUCCS CODE AND VEGETATION INVENTORY FLUCCS CODE (Description) Common Name Scientific Name 111 Single Family Home Currently used as an office 180 Recreational Play field 211 Pasture (Cleared) Indicator Status This is the dominate habitat on site. This is an area totally cleared and was historically farmed in row crops. The clearing occurred prior to any regulation. The area is currently vegetated with disturbed and pioneer plant species. There are scattered pockets of cabbage palms, palmetto and Brazilian pepper. This area is fenced and cross -fenced and at one point this was used for cattle grazing. There are a few Slash pines, cabbage palms and ear leaf acacia along the perimeter with Oil Well Road. Slash pine Pinus elliotti FACW Ear leaf acacia Acacia auriculiformis Exotic Palmetto Serona repens FACU Running oak Quercus pumila UPL Live oak Quercus virginiana FACU Myrsine Myrsine floridana FAC Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolius Exotic Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto FAC wax myrtle Myrica cerifera FAC+ beakrush Rhynchospora microcarpa FACW+ Bahiagrass Paspalum notatum FACU Sandspur Cenchrus echinatus FAC Broom sedge Andropogon glomeratus FACW Sedge Cyperus ligularis FACW Dog Fennel Eupatorium capillifolium FACU pennywort Hydrocotyle spp. FACW mat lippa Phyla nodiflora FACW Guineagrass Panicum maximum FAC- Lantana Lantana samara FACU Ragweed Ambrosia artemisiifolia FACU Whitehead broom Spermacoce verticillata FAC Caesar weed Urena lobata FACU Chocolate weed Melochia corchorifolia FAC Packet Pg. 1245 9.A.5.g 411 Pine Flatwoods This is a small 0.26 acre habitat located along Oil Well Road. This area is vegetated with Slash pines with palmetto as ground cover. Other species such as cabbage palms are also present 742 Borrow Area Other Surface Waters This are consisting of three different borrow pits. One is next to the current parking. The other two were at one time used as cattle ponds. Torpedo grass Panicum repens Nuisance Cattails Typha spp OBL Carolina willow Salix caroliniana OBL primrose willow Ludwigia peruviana OBL 8144 Roads and Highway — Oil Well Road INDICATOR STATUS - Obligate (OBL), Facultative wet plants (FACW), Facultative plants (FAC), Upland (UPL) Packet Pg. 1246 9.A.5.g WILDLIFE SPECIES OBSERVED Common Name Amphibian & Reptiles: American alligator Birds: Dove- ground Vulture, turkey Vultue, Black Boat -tailed Grackle Red winged blackbird Bluejay Gray catbird Northern mockingbird Mammals: Nine -banded armadillo species Alligator mississippiensis Columbina passerina Cathartes aura Coragyps atratus Quiscalus major Agelaius phoeniceus Cyanocitta cristata Dumetella carolinensis Mimus polyglottos Dasypus novemcinctus Status Packet Pg. 1247 9.A.5.g TRANSECTS WALKED Labels Drawing Points Drawing Lines Drawing Polygons Drawing Selected Custom Parcels Streets OSM Hybrid t County Boundaries Parcel Outlines Copyright 2020 MapWise, Inc. All rights reserved. www.mapwise.com. This map is informational only. No representation is made or warranty given as to its content. User assumes all risk of use, MapWise and its suppliers assume no responsibility for any losses resulting from such use. N v 0 330 660 990 it Packet Pg. 1248 9.A.5.g WELL FIELDS 0 a N d r u w LL. r� 3 E E O U t L U L J d 7 C R E E LU Co rn r N O O O O N O N J d Q Packet Pg. 1249 9.A.5.g Vomer county well Field Protection Zones 2010 Well Field Protection Zones W -1 Zone = 1 Year Travel Time Isocontcur W - 2 Zone = 2 Year Travel Time Isocontour W - 3 Zone = 5 Year Travel Time Isocontour DIN W - 4 Zone = 20 Year Travel Time Isocontour I I I I I I I Miles 0 2 4 8 Lee County i • t I _— Orangetree Well Field _--T i Lee County GCollier olden Utilities olden Gate . _._ IS i i i i'q'' i -• Well Field - —f 7 -- , !z. `� ills' ` IS �-- 1•� 1 l [ �- \ ! 1 ,,ice j;j c1 7H. Naples ales " d f I �. ! t �.� `- F • 'sic t tji i'` P Coastal Ridgl e E liy t7 Well Field_ ) {� i 7'.X:1 r 1c L 1 Immokalee i Well Field \ Ave Made Well Field � 3 { City of Naples East Golden Gate Well Field I' t I 11• 1 i �_ ' I Collier County Utilities - Golden Gate Well Field Florida Governmental t..._. L t.'.1.' •.. Utillty Authority Golden Gate City -• - - +' t t Well Field � ..__ �.. ! I , t II l l► _ _ _ i w E `�_ _ - �— ~._y _--• /"� i f Everglades C I Well Field t i i S C'Ar County ,r + Port of the Islands Well Field c+stc+o.+fNrrriss<m- � E M arnM a t-t` I .: . Nan agar« ' / m�ryc ao�v�,wn� _ 7 Packet Pg. 1250 9.A.5.g DEMAND CALCULATION ASSUMPTIONS 0 a N d r w 7 3 E E O U t L V L J d 7 C R E E Lu Co rn r N O O O O N O N J d Q Packet Pg. 1251 9.A.5.g EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH CFPUD DEMAND CALCULATION ASSUMPTIONS The following assumptions were made when calculating the wastewater demand for the proposed uses: • Doctor and dentist office: o Per practitioner — assumed 1 practitioner per 4 employees (assumed 9 employees per calculation below). o Per employee per 8-hour shift — assumed 1 employee per 400 sq. ft. (3,600 sq. ft. / 400 sq. ft.). • Institutions, per meal: o Meal prep on -site will not be daily, as most meals will be prepared off -site. The applicant estimates that 56 meals per week (8 meals per day) will be prepared at the facility. • Office Building: o The PUD permits a maximum of 90,000 sq. ft. Demand for the remaining 15,000 sq. ft. not tied to a specific use in the PUD has been calculated as an office building, in conjunction with the TIS. • School: o Per worker: ■ Elementary/secondary — 1 per 15 students (450 students total), 30 workers. ■ College — 1 per 30 students (300 students total), 10 workers. ■ Daycare — 1 per 8 students (200 students total), 25 workers. o Showers/cafeteria: ■ We do not know if there will be showers at this time. The applicant intends to partner with a school operator to design and build, as well as identify the grades that will be provided. Since it is unknown, we answered "yes". ■ There will be a small cafeteria with outsourced food preparation, which will likely generate less demand than a traditional cafeteria preparing three meals per day; however, we answered "yes" to represent the worst case scenario. • Lodging House/Dormitory o These units were calculated using the rates for hotel or motel. Per the applicant, we estimated there will be two high efficiency washing machines. • Physical Fitness Facilities o Per the applicant, the physical fitness facility will serve approximately 50-100 people per day. There will be no pool, and the facility will be non-profit and operated with a church or place of worship. The usage was calculated assuming 100 people using the rates for "park, public picnic: bathhouse, showers & toilets, per person". • Athletic Field o Per the applicant, the athletic field will serve 50-100 people per day. The usage was calculated assuming 100 people using the rates "park, public picnic: toilets only, per person". Page 1 of 1 H:\2006\2006096A\WP\CFPUD\3rd Resubmittal\Demand Calculation Assumptions (4-19-2023).docx Packet Pg. 1252 9.A.5.g TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT 0 a N d w 7 3 E E O U t L U L J d 7 C R E E LU Co rn r N O O O O N O N J d Q Packet Pg. 1253 9.A.5.g TREBILCOCK CONSULTING SOLUTIONS Traffic Impact Statement Emmanuel Lutheran Church Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) Planned Unit Development Amendment (PUDA) Prepared for: Hole Montes, Inc. 950 Encore Way, Naples, FL 34110 Phone: 239-254-2000 Collier County, Florida 2/20/2023 Prepared by: Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 2800 Davis Boulevard, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239-566-9551 Email: ntrebilcock@trebilcock.biz Collier County Transportation Methodology Fee* — $500.00 Fee Collier County Transportation Review Fee* — Malor Scale Study — $1,500 Fee Note — *to be collected at time of first submittal Packet Pg. 1254 9.A.5.g Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA — Traffic Impact Statement — February 2023 Statement of Certification I certify that this Traffic Impact Statement has been prepared by me or under my immediate supervision and that I have experience and training in the field of Traffic and Transportation Engineering. 2: No 47116 : F STATE OF :4/� Digitally signed by Norman Trebilcock DN: c=US, st=Florida,l=Naples, o=Norman Trebilcock, cn=Norman Trebilcock, email=ntrebilcock@trebilcock.biz Date: 2023.02.27 09:20:54-05'00' Norman J. Trebilcock, AICP, PTOE, PE FL Registration No. 47116 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 2800 Davis Boulevard, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34104 Company Cert. of Auth. No. 27796 PRINTED COPIES OF THIS DOCUMENT ARE NOT CONSIDERED SIGNED AND SEALED AND THE SIGNATURE MUST BE VERIFIED ON ANY ELECTRONIC COPIES. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 12 Packet Pg. 1255 9.A.5.g Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA — Traffic Impact Statement — February 2023 Table of Contents ProjectDescription.......................................................................................................................................4 TripGeneration............................................................................................................................................. 7 Trip Distribution and Assignment................................................................................................. 10 BackgroundTraffic........................................................................................................................ 11 Existing and Future Roadway Network......................................................................................... 12 Project Traffic Impacts — Roadway Link Analysis.......................................................................... 13 SiteAccess Analysis....................................................................................................................................14 ImprovementAnalysis...............................................................................................................................15 Mitigationof Impact..................................................................................................................................16 Appendices Appendix A: Project Conceptual Site Plan.................................................................................................17 Appendix B: Initial Meeting Checklist (Methodology Meeting)................................................................. 20 Appendix C: ITE Trip Generation Calculations.......................................................................................... 27 Appendix D: Collier County Transporation Element Map —TR 3.0...........................................................48 Appendix E: Collier County Access Management Policy —Table 1........................................................... 50 Appendix F: Project Turning Movements................................................................................................ 52 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 13 Packet Pg. 1256 9.A.5.g Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA— Traffic Impact Statement —February 2023 Project Description The Emmanuel Lutheran Church development (also known as Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples) is located on the south side of Oil Well Road (CR 858), west of the Everglades Boulevard and Oil Well Road intersection, and lies within Section 19, Township 48 South, Range 28 East, in Collier County, Florida. Refer to Figure 1— Project Location Map and Appendix A: Project Conceptual Site Plan. Figure 1— Project Location Map S,Ik Ce"Idyar"% Q Fl°r31 nNan.,'i . Y I .,,u.... . !, KAI, a ora+v" 6w—N P�.,n1Ir.I Nlgh SHlual Con+anulonQ I © � ..'� ` wAf°Ivw© ma km+d,MQ Glyjlehdl Napin♦ 11 , n.Y glad � Or. ya nl a nnl TM SgnivMU 9lldula Saa ,, YM ad H.IIlnpinc� I koYM Chanen Flwlda TJnnl Y�aann J I °o1A Project 40 t - NAIF BR(TIFIFRR. V ' 1 ~A t} S tt ° .vd.nnu crAf Plcwmrrclw� need GIN." I i. � I �ara coon nr unar_. meet a.nenrna a«N. aw. ;n�n.aw 1 w"• nWNMa 19 n..e+ana a.una.a Tw r.aatp -dan F n The subject parcels are currently partially developed. The development was previously approved with a zoning classification of Community Facilities Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) to allow 90,000 square feet (sf) — up to 1,000 seats of uses to include worship/church and related social services, a 300 person child and adult day care facility, job training or vocational rehabilitation, a 450 person private school; or, in the alternative, development of up to 10 single family dwelling units, in accordance with Collier County Ordinance #2011-23. The proposed amendment requests to add 2 adjacent parcels to the existing approved site and to allow up to 90,000 sf of uses to include worship/church center (up to 1,000 seats) and related social services, a 200 person child and adult day care facility, job training or vocational rehabilitation, a 450 person private or public school (elementary and secondary school); a 300 student college/university; a maximum of 3,600 sf of medical office; up to 4 food trucks; or, in lieu of permitted community facilities, development of up to 16 single family dwelling units. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 4 Packet Pg. 1257 9.A.5.g Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA — Traffic Impact Statement — February 2023 In addition, the amendment proposes to provide a maximum trip generation cap to allow for flexibility in the proposed uses without creating unforeseen impacts on the adjacent roadway network. The purpose of this Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) is to document the transportation impacts associated with the proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) and Planned Unit Development Amendment (PUDA). This traffic report is in agreement with the latest adopted Collier County Traffic Impact Study Guidelines and Procedures. The project provides the highest and best use scenario with respect to the project's proposed trip generation. Consistent with the recommendations illustrated in Collier County Traffic Impact Study Guidelines and Procedures, traffic generation associated with the proposed development is evaluated based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (TGM), 11t" Edition and ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition. From a traffic standpoint, the permitted CFPUD parameters are depicted in this report consistent with the approved TIS prepared by TR Transportation Consultants, Inc. and dated April 27, 2010. The subject site will continue to allow for the development of church related uses and other uses beneficial to the local community. Consistent with the approved 2010 TIS and in order to provide the most flexibility with the community facility floor area, the development will allow up to 15,000 sf of office use. In agreement with ITE Land Use Code (LUC) descriptions, the ITE land use designations are illustrated in Table 1. A transportation methodology meeting was held with the Collier County Transportation staff on February 9, 2022, via email. For details refer to Appendix B: Initial Meeting Checklist (Methodology Meeting). For the purposes of this analysis, the traffic planning horizon year is assumed to be 2027. Access to the Emmanuel Lutheran Church site is currently provided via a full movement access onto Oil Well Road. In addition, the proposed amendment will allow an additional access on Oil Well Road near the eastern property boundary. A detailed evaluation of applicable access points — turn lane requirements will be performed at the time of site development permitting/platting when more specific development parameters will be made available. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 5 Packet Pg. 1258 9.A.5.g Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA — Traffic Impact Statement — February 2023 Table 1 Development Program — ITE Land Use Designation Ili Land Use - [SIC Code in Brackets] ITE Land Use Code Size Approved Development Parameters(�) 65,000 square feet Church/Place of Worship - [8661] 560 — Church (1,000 seats) Private Elementary and Secondary Schools - 536 — Private School (K-12) 450 students [8211, 8243, 8244, 8299] Child Daycare Services - [8351] 565 — Day Care Center 300 students Office - [all PUD permitted uses typical for 710 —General Office 15,000 square feet office uses] Single -Family Dwellings - [N/A] 210 — Single -Family Detached Varies(3) Housing Proposed Development Parameters Church/Place of Warship - [8661] 560 — Church 65,000 square feet (1,000 seats) Private or Public Elementary and Secondary Schools - [8211, 532 — Private School (K-12) 450 students 8243, 8244, 8299] Child Daycare Services - [8351] 565 — Day Care Center 200 students Colleges and Universities - [8221] 550 — University/College 300 students Medical Office - [8011] 630 — Clinic 3,600 square feet Office - [all PUD permitted uses typical for 710 — General Office 15,000 square feet office uses] Food Trucks - [5963] 926 — Food Cart Pod 4 food carts Single -Family Dwellings - [N/A] 210 —Single-Family Detached Varies (4) Housing Note(s): 1) N/A= Not applicable 2) Consistent with Ordinance #2011-23 and TIS dated April 27, 2010. 3) Convert non-residential uses to single-family dwelling units (maximum 10 units) subject to size and trip cap limitations, as applicable. 4) Convert non-residential uses to single-family dwelling units (maximum 16 units) subject to size and trip cap limitations, as applicable. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 6 Packet Pg. 1259 9.A.5.g Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA — Traffic Impact Statement — February 2023 Trip Generation The software program OTISS (Online Traffic Impact Study Software), most current version is used to evaluate the projected trip generation for the project. The ITE equations and/or rates are used for the trip generation calculations, as applicable. The ITE — OTISS trip generation calculation worksheets are provided in Appendix C: ITE Trip Generation Calculations. The internal capture accounts for a reduction in external traffic because of the interaction between the multiple land uses in a site. Although it is expected that some trips between the proposed on -site uses will be made without travel to the off -site street system (internal capture), conservatively no reductions for internal capture traffic are considered for this project. The pass -by trips account for traffic that is already on the external roadway network and stops at the project on the way to a primary trip destination. In accordance with Collier County and ITE guidelines, no pass -by reductions are recommended for the analyzed land uses. Approved Zoning —Trip Cap Limitations As illustrated in the Ordinance #2011-23, Exhibit F Development Commitments for the Project —1.B, the approved CFPUD "shall be limitted to 666 unadjusted two-way, AM peak hour trips and/or 323 unadjusted two-way, PM peak hour trips; allowing for flexibility in the proposed uses without creating unforseen impacts on the adjacent roadway network. For purposes of calculation of the weekday AM and PM peak hour trip generation for this PUD, the lesser of the weekday AM or PM peak hour trips as calculated in the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Report, titled Trip Generation, 8th Edition or the trip generation as calculated in the ITE Trip Generation Report shall be utilized."( Appendix C) The approved trip cap reflects the ITE Trip Generation Manual (TGM), 8th Edition and it was calculated in the TIS dated April 27, 2010 (reference Table 2A and Appendix Q. Table 2A ITE TGM 8th Edition — Trip Generation — Approved Development — Average Weekday Development Daily (2-way) AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ITE Land Use Size Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Church 65,000 square feet 592 22 14 36 13 14 27 Private School (K-12) 450 students 1,116 223 142 365 33 44 77 Day Care Center 300 students 1,359 119 105 224 93 104 197 General Office 15,000 square feet 310 36 5 41 4 18 22 Traffic 3,377 400 266 666 143 180 323 It is noted that the approved development trip cap was established based on the church square footage. The ITE TGM 8th Edition, LUC 560 (Church) does not provide any traffic data for AM and PM peak hour for the number of seats variable. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 7 Packet Pg. 1260 9.A.5.g Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA — Traffic Impact Statement — February 2023 Church land use — ITE TGM 111h Edition — a trip generation comparison is provided in Appendix C between the available land use variables: gross square footage and number of seats. The number of seats generates the highest traffic impact when ITE TGM 11th Edition is utilized. As such, traffic projections for the proposed amendment will reflect the number of seats. Consistent with the traffic calculations illustrated in the approved TIS dated April 27, 2010, the traffic generated by the permitted CFPUD uses is conservatively evaluated based on the current ITE TGM 11th Edition using the square footage variable (Table 2B and Appendix Q. Table 2B ITE TGM 11th Edition —Trip Generation —Approved Uses —Average Weekday Development Daily (2-way) AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ITE Land Use Size(l) Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Church 65,000 square feet 494 13 8 21 14 18 32 Private School (K-12) 450 students 1,116 224 132 356 33 44 77 Day Care Center 300 students 1,227 124 110 234 111 126 237 General Office 15,000 square feet 223 29 4 33 6 28 34 Traffic 3,060 390 254 644 164 216 380 It is noted that the proposed amendment does not change the permitted parameters for the church use (maximum 1,000 seats). As illustrated in Table 2A and Table 2B, the traffic increase for the church use is 5 vehicles per hour (vph) for the PM peak hour period when the ITE TGM 11th Edition - square footage variable is utilized. However, the traffic increase is significant (73 vph) when the ITE TGM 11th Edition — seat variable is utilized for the church use (Appendix C, Table 2A and Table 2C — PM peak hour). Consistent with the trip cap requirement illustrated in the Ordinance #2011-23, Table 2A reflects the trip generation of the development as currently approved and it is utilized for the purposes of this report. Proposed Zoning — Traffic Generation Potential Private or public school land use — a trip generation comparison is provided between the LUC 532 — Private School (K-12) and LUC 538 — Charter School (K-12) as illustrated in Appendix C. The LUC 532 — Private School (K-12) generates the highest traffic impact and it is utilized for the purposes of this report. The trip generation evaluated for the proposed GMPA/PUDA development conditions is summarized in Table 2C. The maximum traffic impact potential associated with the proposed development at build -out condition is conservatively projected to be 455 unadjusted PM peak hour two-way trips. Based on the information illustrated in Table 2A and Table 2C, the zoning amendment application request will increase the development traffic impacts by approximately 41% in the PM peak hour (455/323-1=40.9%). The traffic increase is approximately 20% when the square footage variable is utilized for the church use, as considered in the 2010 TIS prepared in support of the current zoning approval [(455-100+32)/323-1= 19.8%]. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 8 Packet Pg. 1261 9.A.5.g Emmanuel Lutheran Church - GMPA/PUDA - Traffic Impact Statement - February 2023 Table 2C ITE TGM 11" Edition -Trip Generation - Proposed GMPA/PUDA Build -out - Average Weekday Development Daily (2-way) AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ITE Land Use Size(i) Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Church 1,000 seats 900 42 28 70 45 55 100 Private School (K-12) 450 students 1,116 224 132 356 33 44 77 Day Care Center 200 students 818 83 73 156 74 84 158 General Office 15,000 square feet 223 29 4 33 6 28 34 Clinic 3,600 square feet 164 14 3 17 5 11 16 University/College 300 students 468 35 10 45 14 31 45 Food Cart Pod 4 food carts 246 13 12 25 12 13 25 Traffic 3,935 440 262 702 189 266 455 Proposed Zoning -Transportation Concurrency Evaluation -Traffic Impacts In agreement with the Collier County Traffic Impact Study Guidelines and Procedures, significantly impacted roadways are identified based on the proposed project highest peak hour trip generation (net external traffic) and consistent with the peak hour of the adjacent street traffic. Based on the information contained in Collier County Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR), the peak hour for adjacent roadway network is PM. Table 2D illustrates the estimated net new traffic generated by the proposed amendment. The potential additional traffic is determined as the difference between the maximum traffic impact potential associated with the proposed development (Table 2C) and the adopted trip cap per current zoning approval (Table 2A). Table 2D Trip Generation - Projected Net New Traffic - Average Weekday Development PM Peak Hour Enter Exit Total Proposed Development GMPA/PUDAIlI 189 266 455 Approved Zoning(2) 143 180 323 Net New Traffic 46 86 132 Increase/(Decrease) Note(s): (1) Refer to Table 2C; (2) Refer to Table 2A. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 9 Packet Pg. 1262 9.A.5.g Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA — Traffic Impact Statement — February 2023 Proposed Zoning — Site Access Traffic Impacts The site access operational analysis will be provided at the time of future development order applications and will reflect the overall generated traffic at build -out conditions — weekday AM and PM peak hour trips (Table 2C and Appendix C). Table 2E presents the trip generation for the church use during the Sunday peak hour of the generator (Appendix C — highest generator between the seat variable and the square footage variable). Table 2E Trip Generation — Proposed GMPA/PUDA Build -out Conditions — Sunday Development Sunday Peak Hour of Generator ITE Land Use Size Enter Exit Total Church 65,000 square feet 323 350 673 Based on the traffic data illustrated in Table 2C and Table 2E, the highest traffic impact at the site access location occurs during the AM peak hour (702 two-way trips). Trip Distribution and Assignment The traffic generated by the development is assigned to the adjacent roadway network based on the traffic distribution illustrated in the approved TIS dated April 27, 2010 and consistent with the transportation methodology (Appendix B). The site -generated trip distribution is shown in Table 3, Project Traffic Distribution for PM Peak Hour and is graphically depicted in Figure 2 — Project Distribution by Percentage and by PM Peak Hour. Table 3 Project Traffic Distribution for PM Peak Hour Distribution PM Peak Hr Project Roadway Link CC AUIR Roadway Link Location of Project Traffic Vol.* Link ID # Traffic Enter Exit Oil Well Road 119.0 Immokalee Rd to Project 50% EB-23 WB-43 Oil Well Road 119.0 Project to Everglades Blvd 50% WB — 23 EB — 43 Note(s): * Peak hour, peak direction traffic volumes are underlined and bold to be used in Roadway Link Level of Service calculations; peak hour, peak direction per 2022 Annual Update and Inventory Report. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 10 Packet Pg. 1263 9.A.5.g Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA — Traffic Impact Statement —February 2023 Figure 2 — Project Distribution by Percentage and by PM Peak Hour 50056 50 _ - a L H Cil Well Rd [] Ci1 ARd Q O�. 1, Rtl B. mWCIIRG , t Project Trip Distribution g By Percentage - ¢ t =0 , t� EB 23; WB 43 EB 43; WB 23 --- i v.;d Oil R OR.i f�'.�.'Cwrl� B Oil -WeRd H Rd o w.e Rd ..._. t Project Trip "--` Distribution a - By PM Peak Hour t t cdlue, unelL9 t t .. .�.,e..- 'T a I � Background Traffic The existing traffic conditions are extracted from the 2022 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR). Average background traffic growth rates were estimated for the segments of the roadway network in the study area using the Collier County Traffic Impact Study Guidelines and Procedures recommendation of a minimum 2% growth rate, or the historical growth rate evaluated based on the annual peak hour, peak direction traffic volume (estimated from 2008 through 2022 as illustrated in AUIR), whichever is greater. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 11 Packet Pg. 1264 9.A.5.g Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA — Traffic Impact Statement — February 2023 Another way to derive the background traffic is to use the 2022 AUIR volume plus the trip bank volume. Table 4, Background Traffic without Project, illustrates the application of projected growth rates to generate the projected background (without project) peak hour peak direction traffic volume for the future horizon year 2027. Table 4 Background Traffic without Project (2022 - 2027) 2027 Projected 2027 Projected 2022 AUIR Projected Pk Hr, Pk Dir Pk Hr, Pk Dir CC Pk Hr, Pk Dir Traffic Background k Back Background Roadway AUIR Roadway Link Background Annual Growth Traffic Volume Trip Traffic Volume Link Link Location Traffic Growth Factor w/out Project Bank w/out Project ID # Volume Rate (trips/hr) (tripsTrip (trips/hr) (%/yr)* Growth Bank*** Factor** Oil Well 119.0 Immokalee Rd to 1,170 (EB) 4.00% 1.2167 1,423 528 1 698 EB Road Project Oil Well 119.0 Project to 1,170 (EB) 4.00% 1.2167 1,423 528 1,698 EB Road Everglades Blvd Note(s): * Annual Growth Rate — estimated for 2008-2022 peak hour, peak direction traffic volumes, or 2% minimum. ** Growth Factor = (1 + Annual Growth Rate)5. 2027 Projected Volume = 2022 AUIR Volume x Growth Factor. *** 2027 Projected Volume = 2022 AUIR Volume +Trip Bank. The projected 2027 Peak Hour — Peak Direction Background Traffic is the greater of the Growth Factor or Trip Bank calculation, which is underlined and bold as applicable. Existing and Future Roadway Network The existing roadway conditions are extracted from the 2022 AUIR. Roadway improvements that are currently under construction or are scheduled to be constructed within the five-year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) or Capital Improvement program (CIP) are considered to be committed improvements. As no such improvements were identified in the Collier County Five -Year Work Program (FY2023- FY2027), the evaluated roadway segments are anticipated to remain as such through project build -out (2027 planning horizon year). The existing and future roadway conditions are illustrated in Table 5, Existing and Future Roadway Conditions. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 12 Packet Pg. 1265 9.A.5.g Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA— Traffic Impact Statement — February 2023 Table 5 Existing and Future Roadway Conditions CC 2022 Peak 2027 Peak Roadway AUIR Roadway Link 2022 2022 Hr, Peak Dir 2027 2027 Hr, Peak Dir Roadway Standard Roadway Standard Link Link Location Capacity Capacity Conditions LOS Conditions LOS ID # Volume Volume Oil Well Immokalee Rd 119.0 4D D 2,200 4D D 2,200 Road to Project Oil Well Project to 119.0 4D D 2,200 4D D 2,200 Road Everglades Blvd Note(s): 2U = 2-lane undivided roadway; 4D, 6D, 8D = 4-lane, 6-lane, 8-lane divided roadway, respectively; LOS = Level of Service. Project Traffic Impacts - Roadway Link Analysis The Collier County Transportation Planning Services developed Level of Service (LOS) volumes for the roadway links impacted by the project, which were evaluated to determine the project impacts to the area roadway network in the future. The Collier County Transportation Planning Services guidelines have determined that a project will be considered to have a significant and adverse impact if both the percentage volume capacity exceeds 2% of the capacity for the link directly accessed by the project and for the link adjacent to the link directly accessed by the project; 3% for other subsequent links and if the roadway is projected to operate below the adopted LOS standard. Based on these criteria, this project does not create any significant or adverse impacts to the area roadway network. None of the analyzed links are projected to exceed the adopted LOS standard with or without the project at 2027 future build -out conditions. Table 6A and Table 6B illustrate the LOS impacts of the project on the area roadway network. Table 6A Roadway Link Level of Service (LOS) — Roadway Peak Hour, Peak Direction — Year 2027 2027 Pk % Min LOS Min LOS CC 2027 Pk Project 2027 Pk Hr, Hr, Pk Dir Volume exceeded exceeded Roadway AUIR Roadway Link Hr, Pk Dir Traffic Pk Dir Volume Capacity without with Link Link Location Capacity Added* Background w/Project Impact by Project? Project? ID # Volume Traffic** *** Project Yes/No Yes/No Oil Well Immokalee Rd 119.0 2,200 EB — 23 1,698 EB 1,721 EB 1.05% No No Road to Project Oil Well Project to 119.0 2,200 EB— 43 1,698 EB 1,741 EB 1.95% No No Road Everglades Blvd Note(s): *Refer to Table 3 from this report. **Refer to Table 4 from this report. ***2027 Projected Volume = 2027 Background Traffic + Project Volume Added. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 113 Packet Pg. 1266 9.A.5.g Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA — Traffic Impact Statement — February 2023 Table 613 Roadway Link Level of Service (LOS) — Roadway Peak Hour, Non -Peak Direction — Year 2027 2027 Pk % Min LOS Min LOS CC 2027 Pk Project 2027 Pk Hr, Hr, Non -Pk Volume exceeded exceeded Roadway AUIR Roadway Link Hr, Pk Dir TraffNon-Pk Dir Dir Capacity without with Link Link Location Capacity Added Added Background Volume Impact by Project? Project? ID # Volume Traffic" w/Project Project Yes/No Yes/No *** Oil Well Immokalee Rd 119.0 2,200 WB-43 1,698 WB 1,741 WB 1.95% No No Road to Project Oil Well Project to 119.0 2,200 WB —23 1,698 WB 1,721 WB 0 1.05/ No No Road Everglades Blvd Note(s): *Refer to Table 3 from this report. **Refer to Table 4 for peak direction traffic; Conservatively, a D Factor = 50% is utilized to calculate the non -peak direction traffic ***2027 Projected Volume = 2027 Background Traffic + Project Volume Added. As illustrated in Collier County LDC Chapter 6.02.02 — M. 2, once traffic from a development has been shown to be less than significant on any segment using Collier County TIS significance criterion, the development's impacts are not required to be analyzed further on any additional segments. The analyzed roadway segments are not located within the Collier County's Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA). In addition, the proposed development is not situated within the County's designated Transportation Concurrency Management Area (TCMA). The TCEA's and TCMA's designations are provided in Policy 5.4 and 5.6 of the Transportation Element — Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP). Site Access Analysis Access to the Emmanuel Lutheran Church site is currently provided via a full movement access onto Oil Well Road. In addition, the proposed amendment will allow an additional access on Oil Well Road near the eastern property boundary. Refer to Appendix A: Project Conceptual Site Plan. The secondary access is an existing right-in/right-out connection located approximately 1,000 ft east of the main access. In addition, the 2010 traffic study associated with the current zoning approval reflects two site connections on Oil Well Road and evaluates the eastern access as a right in/right-out connection. Access Management Evaluation Collier County's roadway network is comprised of State, County, City and privately maintained roadways. Roadways are generally classified as Arterial, Collector, or Local. Access management is the design of access between roadways and land development. It promotes the efficient and safe movement of people and goods by reducing conflicts on the roadway system. The Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 14 Packet Pg. 1267 9.A.5.g Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA —Traffic Impact Statement — February 2023 latest adopted Access Management Policy for Collier County is depicted in Resolution No. 13-257, as amended. The Oil Well Road (CR 858) segment from Immokalee Road to Everglades Boulevard is currently an east - west 4-lane divided roadway under Collier County jurisdiction and has a posted legal speed of 45 mph in the vicinity of the project. As illustrated in the Collier County Capital Improvement Element — Transportation Element Map TR-3.0 (Federal Functional Classification/Urban Boundaries — Collier County), Oil Well Road is designated a minor arterial. Refer to Appendix D: Collier County Transportation Element Map—TR-3.0. A review of Collier County Access Management guidelines shows that for a Class 3 roadway, the established access management criteria are as follow: 660 feet minimum connection spacing; 660 feet directional median opening; 1,320 feet full median opening; and 2,640 feet (0.5 mi) signal spacing. Refer to Appendix E: Collier County Access Management Policy—Tablel. Oil Well Road — Main Access (Western Access) This connection is currently a full median opening. Based on our review of the existing full median opening spacing, this access exceeds the adopted full median opening standards for a Class 3 facility. Oil Well Road — Secondary Access (Eastern Access) This access is currently a right-in/right-out connection. Based on our review of the existing connection spacing, this access exceeds the adopted minimum connection spacing standards for a Class 3 roadway. In addition, this connection exceeds the adopted directional median opening spacing standards for a Class 3 roadway. As such, a directional median opening may be allowed at this location. As previously noted, the eastern access was considered and evaluated as a right in/right-out connection in the 2010 TIS associated with the current zoning approval. Trip assignments to access points Potential site access impacts are evaluated for AM and PM peak hour traffic (Table 2C) and Sunday peak hour of the generator (Table 2E). Based on the traffic data illustrated in Table 2C and Table 2E, the highest traffic impact at the site access location occurs during the AM peak hour (702 two-way trips). The assignment of the AM peak hour trips anticipated to be generated by the subject project to the site access driveways is presented in Appendix F: Project Turning Movements. Improvement Analysis The concurrency analysis presented in this report determined that the proposed project is not a significant and adverse traffic generator for the roadway network at this location. There is adequate and sufficient roadway capacity to accommodate the proposed development without adversely affecting adjacent roadway network level of service. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 15 Packet Pg. 1268 9.A.5.g Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA — Traffic Impact Statement — February 2023 The maximum total daily trip generation for the proposed development shall not exceed 455 unadjusted two-way PM peak hour trips, based on the land use codes in the ITE Trip Generation Manual in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval, as applicable. In order to provide more flexibility, the development will have the ability to adjust proposed parameters by converting non-residential uses to single-family dwelling units (up to 16 units), subject to size and trip cap limitations, as applicable. The Oil Well Road roadway improvements for access to the site will be designed and permitted in accordance with the County's Access Management Policy and ROW Handbook, as applicable. A detailed evaluation of applicable access points will be performed at the time of site development permitting/platting when more specific development parameters will be made available. Mitigation of Impact The developer proposes to pay the appropriate Collier County Road Impact Fee as building permits are issued for the project, as applicable. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 16 Packet Pg. 1269 9.A.5.g Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA — Traffic Impact Statement — February 2023 Appendix Project Conceptual Site Plan Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 117 Packet Pg. 1270 fteaawa. t!=eaa - - - - - - - - - - ------------- ----------------------- . . . . . . . . . -- --- - J!! ------ -------------------------- . T oneaft-fta'aa - ----------- L ----------- ---I A Ir twaa Tm v waaaa ausa, eacewa waa anar be nnaa, ft* aul 1p ft .uo. dhw—d ats pm.", a,_uua a xm LAW USE SUMMARY Acne, lRercentm. owwkw 207 9-%3% m1k, Su.1— 0,111 11.93 X .01— L 175 27.27 Noano Ptww pend, 1.00 4.60% skle"" 1.00 .10, • take 1-09 112311, P-- Area 0.26 719% ■ RecteatioeV Soddedi 10.37 47,75% Landscape 12 A— 21.72 MOO % I N.4ulned Open Space 21-72 Acna� x 30% 6.52 Acres Mana— A- .09— C: F,aaatan Total Olaut Space 13 72 A— 63.17% Ukd.3 Ukk P—'� ite,,mostion, Sodded and L.,buwd Age.) T ZThe Use areasw wrteeppeal In W. and smect . _m we Req ired 1"oll had" w VMtt2Uto be Retained 1.7 = . 0.15 . 0.26 A tanftavw_� PtbHned Existing NtK* Vegetation - 0.26 Acnest maal— total moor 90A00 0. T_ AbWnuan Principst Structure 1,1041m, Ii. faa� mv a2-ad • Acluahkm nuadenue, h.W : 30 het a_,b_ 3RWf_a —T dft� WuctlOhe � t, than Wafthip C4nW Inua vrmt WOrdip Centv tede typ v MaN n,ew.— Zoned he4M 35 hatnead,%ea : ♦ Actual heWd 42 fM mmornuin I'and 'raEMMANUEL EVANGELICAL lap C Maeneae." ."aa.FLU". EXHIBIT C LUTHERAN o �asnw_= CHURCH C.. MASTER PLAN I RuwMAtatRtefgN aumamnau'm — _ _ I Packet Pg. 1271 1 9.A.5.g —I -_—_—_—_i9LId, IkFS_—_---_—_—. _Ra WTAKE -" r + !.- + 41L 41nL ROAD ---- 4 HIGH'A'A'u - _�-_ -' i � -- ------ ��- tgG'tS++la�u7 1-- -max. ��...�;.I r - �Tv - 79 SET AACK _ _ _ _ 75'S:E DACK . - --r e'D' Tvpe'a' ""-I.andscap � r Ih fr•U •. 'r am7 _— LAKE Buffer Pr,`e� Roadway t t - - Faamtnrt Focl6a: ! Polratllsl Fc l TW* .,rrcnr Firlr. It R kmii Ara. 25'Phfe Type'B II L-ft.pa gam. l t 6I1040ALL ("unapt I Whip rmlef L-e- -- 755ETRACKl� to�3 Q �g•gI s sI LAKE 1"ypa II' " `� lan!xrapc Buller I �..r ... wtNn 75' x501 SRItkY.Sc ��r � 75'SETBACif� f 'n'F 7an6d. EF,strkac (L-d U. ie Smla Famllgi " ;"KJWut +E.AA mLss aARwrxsu LAND USE SUMMARYmI Acres Percentage t F S I ro e Zarrtd : E Ea Ws Development Area 23.58 65.65% 19 an h) Use16YeGan1} Landscape Buffers? Setback 5.07 14,11 h G —^ 25'lridd Type'6' 1.u-dtrpe Buffer 75SEi BACK 'O3 Sports Fields 1.32 3-67 u rf within 7 i wide smhdck Lake 5.69 15.81 % Preserve Area 0' 0.75 9b Zoned : E EsIalea lLand Use la angle really; vacanit I� Development Intensity per Sec. D of CFPUD Total 35.92 100.00 96 �rs • • Maximum total floor area = 90,000 s.f. sersnAccK � U1KF Minimum Open Space Required? Provided Maximum Principal Structure Height 35.92 Acres X 30%=10.78 Acres Zoned height = 30 feet maximum 79 sETDA K Actual height = 38 feet maximum for all structures Preserves can be used to meet L.D,C required landscape other than Worship Center buffer In accordance with Exhibit F, sechon 2.8 of the e, s GFPUD, Worship Center ❑ • Zoned height - 35 feet maximum m Lakes shawn are conceptual and may change during the Actual height = 42 feet maxhnum > 111- SDP process. Deviations 1 kE'- 101mmum Native Vegetation Required) Provided = Deviations i 1 L7 Acres x 15 Percent - 0.26 (plusrminu5) Acres 1l See list of Requested NOTES; za vAda ripe Capn ear LRPAll stackingshall occur within the development with no f"-r impacts on Oil Well Road for all uses. 315T AVE, NE Go ro I- Packet Pg. 1272 9.A.5.g Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA — Traffic Impact Statement — February 2023 Appendix B. Initial Meeting Checklist (Methodology Meeting) Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 1 20 Packet Pg. 1273 9.A.5.g Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA — Traffic Impact Statement — February 2023 INITIAL MEETING CHECKLIST Suggestion: Use this Appendix as a worksheet to ensure that no important elements are overlooked. Cross out the items that do not apply, or N/A (not applicable). Date: February 9. 2022 Time: N/A Location: N/A - Via Email People Attendine: Name, Organization, and Telephone Numbers 1) Michael Sawyer, Collier County Growth Management Division 2) Norman Trebilcock, TCS 3) Ciprian Malaescu, TCS Study Preparer: Preparer's Name and Title: Norman Trebilcock. AICP, PTOE, PE Organization: Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Address & Telephone Number: 2800 Davis Boulevard, Suite 200, Naples. FL 34104: ph 239-566-9551 Reviewer(s): Reviewer's Name & Title: Michael Sawyer, Proiect Manager Organization: Collier County Transportation Planning Department Telephone Number: 239-252-2926 Applicant: Applicant's Name: Hole Montes, Inc. Address: 950 Encore Way. Naples. F134110 Telephone Number: 239-254-2000 Proposed Development: Naive: Emmanuel Lutheran Church - GMPA and PUD Rezone Location: South of Oil Well Road (CR 858) and west of Everglades Boulevard, in the Golden Gate Estates area, in Collier County. Florida (refer to Figure 1). Land Use Type: Varies ITE Code #: Per Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual. 1 lth Edition Description: The subiect project is currently approved to allow several community type uses per Ord. # 11-23. The applicant intends to add 2 parcels to the PUD. Based on current anprovals, the Proiect is allowed to develop 90,000 sf (1,000 seats) of worship/church and related social services, a 300 person child and adult day care facility, iob training or vocational rehabilitation. a 450 person private school: or, in the alternative, development of up to 10 single family dwelling units. Page 1 of 6 a m W c E E O U t L t V c cv d t 3 J d 7 C O E E W 0 0 T- N O 0 0 0 N O N J a 0 I- N c O A m c O M Qt2 O. a U- c m E M 0 M CD E M V M a Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e � 21 Packet Pg. 1274 9.A.5.g Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA —Traffic Impact Statement — February 2023 The proposed application requests to allow 90,000 sf (1,000 seats) of worship/church and related social services, a 200 person child and adult day care facility, a 300 student college/university, a 450 person private/public school (elementary and secondary school), a maximum of 3,600 sf of medical office, up to 4 food trucks-, or, in lieu of permitted community facilities, development of up to 16 single family dwelling units. Figure 1— Project Location Map Vi l -9 W � •rwq oro►.�q n.wr yr J '` ._.��V Project :" M "0 i404. Go gle Zoning Existing: PUD—Ord. #11-23 Comprehensive plan recommendation: GMPA-PUDZ Requested: approval for development Findings of the Preliminary Study: Per Ord. #11-23, the approved trip cap is 666 trips for AM peak hour and 323 trips for PM peak hour (unadjusted two-way trips) or as calculated per current ITE Trip Generation Manual, whichever is less. The TIS shall be consistent with Collier County TIS Guidelines and Procedures. Proposed TIS will include trip generation traffic distribution and assignments, significance test (based on 20/a/2%/3% criteria). Trip Generation — ITE Trip Generation Manual, 1 lth Edition and ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition. Conservatively, internal capture and pass -by rates are not considered. Traffic impacts are evaluated based on the projected net new traffic (difference between the proposed development traffic and the approved current trip cap). Page 2 of 6 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 122 Packet Pg. 1275 9.A.5.g Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA — Traffic Impact Statement — February 2023 Study Type: Since proiected net new external AM or PM project traffic is greater than 100 two-way peak hour trips, this study qualifies as a Maior TIS — significant roadway and/or operational impacts. The Proposed change will provide a new trip cap for the Project. The miected traffic associated with the church use will reflect daily. AM and PM peak hour based on the higher generator (square footage vs seats). In addition, church use will be evaluate for Sunday peak of the generator based on number of seats (consistent with the current Collier County Road Impact Fee Schedule). The TIS will determine if there is consistencv with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element. The report will provide existing Level of Service (LOS) and document the impact the Proposed change will have on designated arterial and collector roads. Roadway concurrency analysis — based on estimated net new external PM traffic. The analyzed development is not located within the County's Transportation Concurrence Exception Area (TCEA) or within the County's designated Transportation Concurrency Management Areas (TCMAs). The TCEAs' and TCMAs' designations are provided in Policy 5.4 and 5.6 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan. Turn lane improvements at the site access intersections will be evaluated at the time of future site development permitting/platting when more specific development partuneters will be made available. Study Type: (if not net increase, operational study) Small Scale TIS ❑ Minor TIS ❑ Maior TIS Study Area: Boundaries: Adiacent streets — Oil Well Road; 31" Ave NE Additional intersections to be analyzed: N/A Build Out Year: 2026 Planning Horizon Year: 2026 Analysis Time Period(s): AM/PM Peak Hour Future Off -Site Developments: N/A Source of Trip Generation Rates: ITE Trip Generation Manual (TGM), 1la' Edition Reductions in Trip Generation Rates: None: N/A Pass -by trips: N/A Internal trips: N/A Transit use: N/A Other: N/A Horizon Year Roadway Network Improvements: 2026 Page 3 of 6 a m cv U. c E E O U t L t V c cv L d t 3 J d 3 c co E E W ao 0 N 0 0 0 0 N 0 N J a eo N c 0 0 .' CD tY c O 0 Qt2 0. a u_ c cm E M 0 0 CD E M 0 M a Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 123 Packet Pg. 1276 9.A.5.g Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA— Traffic Impact Statement — February 2023 Methodology & Assumptions: Non -site traffic estimates: Collier County traffic counts and 2021 AUIR Site -trip generation: OTISS — ITE TGM, 11t` Edition Trip distribution method Per distribution illustrated in the TIS associated with the previously approved zoning application — refer to Figure 2. Traffic assignment method: Site traffic assignment Traffic growth rate: Historical growth rate or 2% minimum Turning movements: Preliminary site access taming movements. Figure 2— Project Trip distribution by Percentage 50°6 i H H e 0 � r p Project Trip Distribution By Percentage ' I q ' i Page 4 of 6 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 124 Packet Pg. 1277 9.A.5.g Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA — Traffic Impact Statement — February 2023 Special Features: (from preliminary study or prior experience) Accidents locations: N/A Sight distance: N/A Queuing: N/A Access location & configuration: N/A Traffic control: MUTCD Signal system location & progression needs: N/A On -site parking needs: N/A Data Sources: Collier County traffic counts and 2021 AUIR Base maps: N/A Prior study reports: N/A Access policy and jurisdiction: N/A Review process: N/A Requirements: N/A Miscellaneous: N/A Small Scale Study — No Fee Minor Study - $750.00 Major Study - $1,500.00 Y Methodology Fee $500 X Includes 0 intersections Additional Intersections - $500.00 each AlI fees will be agreed to during the Methodology meeting and must be paid to Transportation prior to our sign -off on the application. SIGNATURES NornW vL Tre.&ooele Shady Preparer—Norman Trebilcock Reviewer(s) Applicant Page 5 of G Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 25 Packet Pg. 1278 9.A.5.g Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA — Traffic Impact Statement — February 2023 Collier County Traffic Impact Study Review Fee Schedule Fees will be paid incrementally as the development proceeds: Methodology Review, Analysis Review, and Sufficiency Reviews. Fees for additional meetings or other optional services are also provided below. Methodology Review - $500 Fee Methodology Review includes review of a submitted methodology statement, including review of submitted trip generation estimate(s), distribution, assignment, and review of a "Small Scale Study" determination, written approval/comments on a proposed methodology statement, and written confirmation of a re -submitted, amended methodology statement, and one meeting in Collier County, if needed. "Small Scale Study" Review - No Additional Fee (Includes one sufficiency review) Upon approval of the methodology review, the applicant may submit the study. The review includes: a concurrency determination, site access inspection and confirmation of the study compliance with trip generation, distribution and maximum threshold compliance. "Minor Study Review" - $750 Fee (Includes one sufficiency review) Review of the submitted traffic analysis includes: optional field visit to site, confirmation of trip generation, distribution, and assignment, concurrency determination, confirmation of committed improvements, review of traffic volume data collected/assembled, review of off -site improvements within the right-of-way, review of site access and circulation, and preparation and review of `sufficiency" comments/questions. "Major Study Review" - $1,500 Fee (Includes two intersection analvsis and two sufficiency reviews Review of the submitted traffic analysis includes: field visit to site, confirmation of trip generation, special trip generation and/or trip length study, distribution and assignment, concurrency determination, confirmation of committed improvements, review of traffic volume data collected/assembled, review of traffic growth analysis, review of off -site roadway operations and capacity analysis, review of site access and circulation, neighborhood traffic intrusion issues, any necessary improvement proposals and associated cost estimates, and preparation and review of up to two rounds of `'sufficiency" comments/questions and/or recommended conditions of approval. "Additional intersection Review" - $500 Fee The review of additional intersections shall include the same parameters as outlined in the "Major Study Review" and shall apply to each intersection above the first two intersections included in the "Major Study Review' "Additional Sufficiency Reviews" - $500 Fee Additional sufficiency reviews beyond those initially included in the appropriate study shall require the additional Fee prior to the completion of the review. Page 6 of 6 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 1 26 Packet Pg. 1279 9.A.5.g Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA — Traffic Impact Statement — February 2023 Appendix C ITE Trip Generation Calculations Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 1 27 Packet Pg. 1280 9.A.5.g Emmanuel Lutheran Church - GMPA/PUDA - Traffic Impact Statement - February 2023 ITE Trip Generation Manual 111h Ed. - Church Use - Trip Generation Comparison Land Use: 560 Church Description A church is a building in which public worship services are held. A church houses an assembly hall or sanctuary. It may also house meeting rooms, classrooms, and, occasionally, dining, catering, or event facilities. Synagogue (Land Use 561) and mosque (Land Use 562) are related uses. Additional Data Worship services are typically held on Sundays. Some of the surveyed churches offered day care or extended care programs during the week. The sites were surveyed in the 1980s, the 1990s, the 2000s, and the 201 Os in Alberta (CAN), California, Colorado, Florida, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Texas, and Virginia. Source Numbers 169, 170, 423, 428, 436, 554, 571, 583, 629, 631, 704, 903, 904, 957, 971, 981, 1080 466 Trip Generation Manual 111h Edition -Volume 4 „C Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 128 Packet Pg. 1281 9.A.5.g Emmanuel Lutheran Church - GMPA/PUDA -Traffic Impact Statement - February 2023 PERIOD SETTING Analysis Name: Daily Project Name: Church - Traffic Comparison No: Date: 12/2/2021 City: State/Province: Zip/Postal Code: Country: Client Name: Analysts Name: Edition: Land Use Independent Size Variable Time Period Method 560 - Church (General 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 90(0) Weekday Average Urban/Suburban) 7.6 560 - Church -1 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 65(0) Weekday Average (General 7.6 Trip Generation Manual, 11th Ed Entry Exit Total 3420) 3420) 6840) 50% 50% 2470) 2470) 4940) 50% 50% Urban/Suburban) 560 - Church - 2 Seats 1000 Weekday Average 450(t) 4500) 9000 ) (General 0.9 50% 50% Urban/Suburban) (0) indicates size out of range. (1) indicates small sample size, use carefully. - - ------- ---- -- -- PERIOD SETTING Analysis Name: AM Peak Hour Project Name: Church -Traffic Comparison No: Date: 12/2/2021 City: State/Province: Zip/Postal Code: Country: Client Name: Analysts Name: Edition: Trip Generation Manual, 11th Ed Land Use Independent Size Time Period Method Entry Exit Total Variable 560 - Church (General 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 90 Weekday, Peak Average 18 11 29 Urban/Suburban) Hour of Adjacent 0.32 62% 38% Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. 560 - Church -1 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 65 Weekday, Peak Average 13 8 21 (General Hour of Adjacent 0.32 62% 38% Urban/Suburban) Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 560 - Church - 2 Seats 1000(0) Weekday, Peak Average 420) 280) 700 ) (General Hour of Adjacent 0.07 60% 40% Urban/Suburban) Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. (0) indicates size out of range. (1) indicates small sample size, use carefully. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 29 Packet Pg. 1282 9.A.5.g Emmanuel Lutheran Church - GMPA/PUDA - Traffic Impact Statement - February 2023 PERIOD SETTING Analysis Name: PM Peak Hour Project Name: Church - Traffic Comparison No: Date: 12/2/2021 City: State/Province: Zip/Postal Code: Country: Client Name: Analyst's Name: Edition: Trip Generation Manual, 11th Ed Land Use Independent Size Variable Time Period Method 560 - Church (General 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 90 Weekday, Peak Average Urban/Suburban) Hour of Adjacent 0.49 Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. 560 - Church -1 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 65 Weekday, Peak Average (General Hour of Adjacent 0.49 Urban/Suburban) Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 Entry Exit Total 19 25 44 43% 57% 14 18 32 44% 66% P.M. 560 - Church - 2 Seats 1000(0) Weekday, Peak Average 450) 550) 1000 ) (General Hour of Adjacent 0.1 45% 55% Urban/Suburban) Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. (0) indicates size out of range. (1) indicates small sample size, use carefully. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 130 Packet Pg. 1283 9.A.5.g Emmanuel Lutheran Church - GMPA/PUDA - Traffic Impact Statement - February 2023 ITE Trip Generation Manual 111h Ed. - School Use - Trip Generation Comparison Land Use: 532 Private School (K 12) Description A private school (K 12) serves students attending kindergarten through the 12th grade. The school may also offer pre -kindergarten classes and extended care and day care. Students may travel a long distance from their residence to the private school. Elementary school (Land Use 520), middle school/junior high school (Land Use 522), high school (Land Use 525), private school (K-8) (Land Use 530), private high school (Land Use 534), charter elementary school (Land Use 536), and charter school (K 12) (Land Use 538) are related uses. Additional Data Some of the schools included in this land use provided bus service. One study reported that carpooling was used instead of bus service. The sites were surveyed in the 1980s, the 1990s, the 2000s, and the 2010s in Delaware, Florida, Maryland, Montana, Oregon, Texas, and Washington. Source Numbers 283, 355, 370, 536, 571, 613, 906 "IFr General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 400-799) 395 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 31 Packet Pg. 1284 9.A.5.g Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA — Traffic Impact Statement — February 2023 Land Use: 538 Charter School (K 12) Description A charter school (K-12) is a school that is publicly funded and privately managed. The school serves students attending kindergarten through the 12th grade. The school may also offer extended care and day care. Elementary school (Land Use 520), middle school/junior high school (Land Use 522), high school (Land Use 525), private school (K 8) (Land Use 530), private school (K-12) (Land Use 532), private high school (Land Use 534), and charter elementary school (Land Use 536) are related uses. Additional Data The sites were surveyed in the 2010s in Minnesota and Nevada. Source Numbers 1039, 1047 ,`— General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 400-799) 425 Trebilcocl< Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 32 Packet Pg. 1285 9.A.5.g Emmanuel Lutheran Church - GMPA/PUDA - Traffic Impact Statement - February 2023 PERIOD SETTING Analysis Name: AM Peak Hour of Generator Project Name: School Comparison Public vs No: Private Date: 2/14/2022 City: State/Province: Zip/Postal Code: Country: Client Name: Analyst's Name: Edition: Trip Generation Manual, 11th Ed Land Use Independent Size Time Period Method Variable Entry Exit Total 532 - Private School Students 450 Weekday, AM Best Fit (LIN) 231 135 366 (K-12) (General Peak Hour of T = 0.76 (X)+24.37 63% 37% Urban/Suburban Generator 538 - Charter School Students 450 Weekday, AM Best Fit (LIN) 175(o) 155(o) 330(o) (K-12) (General Peak Hour of T = 1.06 (X)+-146.78 53% 47% Urban/Suburban) Generator (0) indicates small sample size, use carefully. PERIOD SETTING Analysis Name: PM Peak Hour of Generator Project Name: School Comparison Public vs No Private Date: 2/14/2022 City: State/Province: Zip/Postal Code: Country: Client Name: Analyst's Name: Edition: Trip Generation Manual, 11th Ed Land Use Independent Size Time Period Method Entry Exit Total Variable 532 - Private School Students 450 Weekday, PM Best Fit (LIN) 115(0) 158(0) 273(0) (K-12) (General Peak Hour of T = 0.41 (X)+88.78 42% 58% Urban/Suburban) Generator 538 - Charter School Students 450 Weekday, PM Best Fit (LIN) 91(0) 90(0) 181(c (K-12) (General Peak Hour of T = 0.92 (X)+-232.86 50% 50% Urban/Suburban) Generator (0) indicates small sample size, use carefully. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 33 Packet Pg. 1286 9.A.5.g Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA — Traffic Impact Statement — February 2023 Approved CFPUD — Ordinance 2011-23 — Approved Trip Cap EXHIBIT "F" DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS FOR THE PROJECT EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH COMMUNITY FACILITIES PUD 1. TRANSPORTATION A. For services and other periods and events of significant traffic generation, as determined by Collier County staff, the property owner shall provide traffic control by law enforcement or a law enforcement approved service provider as directed by Collier County staff, with staffing and at location(s) as directed by the Collier County Transportation Administrator or his designee. B. The development within this project shall be limited to 666 unadjusted two-way, AM peak hour trips and/or 323 unadjusted two-way, PM peak hour trips; allowing for flexibility in the proposed uses without creating unforeseen impacts on the adjacent roadway network. For purposes of calculation of the weekday AM and PM peak hour trip generation for this PUD, the lesser of the weekday AM or PM peak hour trips as calculated in the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Report, titled Trip Generation, St' Edition or the trip generation as calculated in the then current ITE Trip Generation Report shall be utilized. C. A potential for interconnection with the residential properties to the west shall be provided if the subject property develops only with single family uses and the conditions for the use of the interconnection are acceptable to the developer and the residential properties to the west. If the subject property is developed without residential uses within four years of the date of adoption, then this commitment shall no longer be deemed applicable. 2. ENVIRONMENTAL A. Conservation/preservation areas comprising a minimum of 0.26 acres are shown on the CFPUD Master Plan that meets the minimum of 0.26t acres required to be preserved by the LDC. B. As part of the first development order application (SDP, Plat or other), the applicant shall provide an updated listed species survey to show the property's proximity to bear or panther habitat (primary or secondary) and indicate if any mitigation is required by the FWC/USFWS. If mitigation is required, the applicant shall coordinate said mitigation with County Environmental Staff members. Emma 1 Ew Schcai Lmhcm Church PLIM-PL2009.2/96 Last revised: 0/-25-11 Page 10 of 10 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 1 34 Packet Pg. 1287 9.A.5.g Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA — Traffic Impact Statement — February 2023 Approved CFPUD — ITE Trip Generation Manual, 8th Ed. — Per TIS dated 4-27-10 TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. IV. TRIP GENERATION Trip generation was determined by referencing the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) report, titled Trip Generation, 81h Edition. Land Use Code 560 (Church) was utilized for the trip generation purposes of the church related uses. For the weekday peak hour church traffic, the square footage of floor area was utilized for trip generation purposes due to the lack of data based on the number of seats. However, for the Sunday peak hour analysis, the number of seats was assumed as the independent variable for trip generation purposes. For the school use, Land Use Code 536 (Private School K-12) was utilized. For the Dayeare facility, Land Use Code 565 (Day Care Center) was utilized and for the office uses, Land Use Code 710 (General Office) was utilized. It should be noted that the offices will be utilized by the Church during the weekday, However, in order to maintain the most flexibility with the floor area, the space was analyzed as separate office uses. Table 2 indicates the trip generation of the uses proposed as part of the re -zoning application, and Table 3 indicates the trip generation of the church during the Sunday peak hour of the church uses. Table 2 Emmanuel Lutheran site Fvkfina Chnrrh _ Weekdav Trin Generatinn AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily Land Use In Ogt Total In Out I Total (2-way) Church 22 14 36 13 14 27 592 (65,000 sc. ft.) Private School 223 142 365 33 44 77 1,116 (450 Students _ Day Care 119 105 224 93 104 197 1,359 (300 Students) Office _ 36 5 41 4 18 22 310 (1 s,no0 s.e) Total Trips 400 266 666 143 1 180 323 3,377 Page 4 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 1 35 Packet Pg. 1288 9.A.5.g Emmanuel Lutheran Church - GMPA/PUDA - Traffic Impact Statement - February 2023 Approved CFPUD - ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Ed. Land Use: 565 Day Care Center Description A day care center is a facility where care for pre-school age children is provided, normally during daytime hours. A day care facility generally includes classrooms, offices, eating areas, and playgrounds. A center may also provide after -school care for school -age children. Additional Data The technical appendices provide supporting information on time -of -day distributions for this land use. The appendices can be accessed through either the ITETripGen web app or the trip generation resource page on the ITE website (hops.//www.ite:or8/technical-resources/topics/trip: and -parking :generation/). The sites were surveyed in the 1980s, the 1990s, the 2000s, and the 2010s in California, Florida, Georgia, Maryland, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and Wisconsin. Source Numbers 169, 208, 216, 253, 335, 336, 337, 355, 418, 423, 536, 550, 562, 583, 633, 734, 866, 869, 877, 878, 954, 959, 981 508 Trip Generation Manual 11 th Edition • Volume 4 W Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 136 Packet Pg. 1289 9.A.5.g Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA — Traffic Impact Statement — February 2023 Land Use: 710 General Office Building Description A general office building is a location where affairs of businesses, commercial or industrial organizations, or professional persons or firms are conducted. An office building houses multiple tenants that can include, as examples, professional services, insurance companies, investment brokers, a banking institution, a restaurant, or other service retailers. A general office building with a gross floor area of 10,000 square feet or less is classified as a small office building (Land Use 712). Corporate headquarters building (Land Use 714), single tenant office building (Land Use 715), medical -dental office building (Land Use 720), office park (Land Use 750), research and development center (Land Use 760), and business park (Land Use 770) are additional related uses. Additional Data If two or more general office buildings are in close physical proximity (within a close walk) and function as a unit (perhaps with a shared parking facility and common or complementary tenants), the total gross floor area or employment of the paired office buildings can be used for calculating the site trip generation. If the individual buildings are isolated or not functionally related to one another, trip generation should be calculated for each building separately. For study sites with reported gross floor area and employees, an average employee density of 3.3 employees per 1,000 square feet GFA (or roughly 300 square feet per employee) has been consistent through the 1980s, 1990s, and 2000s. No sites counted in the 2010s reported both GFA and employees. The average building occupancy varies considerably within the studies for which occupancy data were provided. The reported occupied gross floor area was 88 percent for general urban/suburban sites and 96 percent for the center city core and dense multi -use urban sites. The technical appendices provide supporting information on time -of -day distributions for this land use. The appendices can be accessed through either the ITETripGen web app or the trip generation resource page on the ITE website (https.//www,ite:or�/technicaI-resources/topics/trip: and -parkin -generation/). The average numbers of person trips per vehicle trip at the eight center city core sites at which both person trip and vehicle trip data were collected are as follows: 2.8 during Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, one hour between 7 and 9 a.m. • 2.9 during Weekday, AM Peak Hour of Generator 2.9 during Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, one hour between 4 and 6 p.m. 3.0 during Weekday, PM Peak Hour of Generator WGeneral Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 400-799) 707 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 137 Packet Pg. 1290 9.A.5.g Emmanuel Lutheran Church - GMPA/PUDA - Traffic Impact Statement - February 2023 The average numbers of person trips per vehicle trip at the 18 dense multi -use urban sites at which both person trip and vehicle trip data were collected are as follows: • 1.5 during Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, one hour between 7 and 9 a.m. • 1.5 during Weekday, AM Peak Hour of Generator • 1.5 during Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, one hour between 4 and 6 p.m. • 1.5 during Weekday, PM Peak Hour of Generator The average numbers of person trips per vehicle trip at the 23 general urban/suburban sites at which both person trip and vehicle trip data were collected are as follows: 1.3 during Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, one hour between 7 and 9 a.m. • 1.3 during Weekday, AM Peak Hour of Generator • 1.3 during Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, one hour between 4 and 6 p.m. • 1.4 during Weekday, PM Peak Hour of Generator The sites were surveyed in the 1980s, the 1990s, the 2000s, the 2010s, and the 2020s in Alberta (CAN), California, Colorado, Connecticut, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ontario (CAN)Pennsylvania, Texas, Utah, Virginia, and Washington. Source Numbers 161, 175, 183, 184, 185, 207, 212, 217, 247, 253, 257, 260, 262, 273, 279, 297, 298, 300, 301, 302, 303, 304, 321, 322, 323, 324, 327, 404, 407, 408, 419, 423, 562, 734, 850, 859, 862, 867, 869, B83, 884, 890, 891, 904, 940, 944, 946, 964, 965, 972, 1009, 1030, 1058, 1061 708 Trip Generation Manual IIth Edition • Volume 4 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 138 Packet Pg. 1291 9.A.5.g Project Neme Dab: Sbte7rovinw: Country: Ansysfa Name.. Emmanuel Church - Cunent PUD - ITE 11th Ed 12MO21 No: City: ZIWPosW Code Client Name: Edition: WEEKDAY LAND USE 81,E Entry Exit 560 - Church (General Urban/Suburban) 65 n) 247 247 Reduction 0 i 0 Internal 0 0 Pass -by 0 0 Nan -pass -by 247 247 532-Private School (K-12) (General Urban/Suburban) 450 M 558 558 Reduction 0 0 Internal 0 0 Pass -by 0 0 Non -pass -by 558 558 555 - Day Cara Center (General Urban/Suburban) 300 IA 614 613 Reduction ( 0 0 Internal 0 0 Pass -by 0 0 Non -pass -by 614 613 710 - General Office Building (General Urban/Suburban) 15 n) 112 111 Reduction 0 0 Internal 0 0 Pass -by 0 0 Nan -pass -by 112 111 1631 1529 Total Total Reduction 0 0 Total Internal 0 0 Total Pass -by 0 0 Total Non -pass -by 1531 1529 (1) 1000 Sq. Ft GFA j (2) Swam. v W Trip Generation Manual,1161 EE AM PEAK HOUR Entry Exit 13 8 0 0 D 0 0 0 13 8 224 132 0 0 0 D 0 0 224 132 124 110 0 0 0 0 0 0 124 110 29 4 0 D 0 0 0 0 29 4 390 254 0 0 0 D 0 0 390 254 PM PEAK HOUR Entry Exit 14 t8 0 0 0 0 D 0 14 18 33 44 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 44 111 126 0 0 0 0 0 0 111 126 6 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 20 164 216 0 0 0 0 0 0 154 216 a Packet Pg. 1292 9.A.5.g Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA — Traffic Impact Statement — February 2023 PERIOD SETTING Analysis Name: Weekday Project Name : Emmanuel Church - Current No: PUD - ITE 11th Ed Date: 12/2/2021 City: StatelProvince: Zip/Postal Code: Country: Client Name: Analyst's Name: Edition: Trip Generation Manual, llth Ed Land Use Independent Variable Size Time Period Method Entry Exit Total 560 - Church (General 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 65(o) Weekday Average 2470) 2470) 4940) Urban/Suburban) 7.6 50% 50% 532-Private School Students 450(o) Weekday Average 5580) 5580) 11160) (K-12) (General 2.48 50% 50% Urban/Suburban) 565 - Day Care Center Students 300(o) Weekday Average 614 613 1227 (General 4.09 50% 50% UrbanlSuburban) 710 - General Office 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 15 Weekday Best Ft (LOG) 112 111 223 Building (General Ln(T) = 0.87Ln(X) 50% 50% Urban/Suburban) +3.05 (0) indicates size out of range. (1) indicates small sample size, use carefully. PERIOD SETTING Analysis Name: AM Peak Hour Project Name : Emmanuel Church - Current No: PUD - ITE llth Ed Date: 12/2/2021 City: StatelProvince: Zip/Postal Code: Country: Client Name: Analyst's Name: Edition: Trip Generation Manual, ttth Ed Land Use Independent Variable Size Time Period Method Entry Exit Total 560 - Church (General 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 65 Weekday, Peak Average 13 8 21 Urban/Suburban) Hour of Adjacent 0.32 62% 38% Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. 532 - Private School Students 450 Weekday, Peak Average 2240) 1320) 3560 ) (K-12) (General Hour of Adjacent 0.79 63% 37% Urban/Suburban) Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. 565 - Day Care Center Students 300(o) Weekday, Peak Average 124 110 234 (General Hour of Adjacent 0.78 53% 47% Urban/Suburban) Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. 710 - General Office 1000 Sq. Ft GFA 15 Weekday, Peak Best Fit (LOG) 29 4 33 Building (General Hour of Adjacent Ln(T) = 0.86Ln(X) 88% 12% Urban/Suburban) Street Traffic, +1.16 One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. (0) indicates size out of range. (1) indicates small sample size, use carefully. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 140 Packet Pg. 1293 9.A.5.g Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA — Traffic Impact Statement — February 2023 PERIOD SETTING Analysis Name: PM Peak Hour Project Name: Emmanuel Church - Current No: PUD - ITE 11th Ed Date: 1212/2021 City: State/Province: Zip/Postal Code: Country: Client Name: Analysts Name: Edition: Trip Generation Manual, 11th Ed Land Use Independent Size Time Period Method Entry Exit Total Variable 560 - Church (General 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 65 Weekday, Peak Average 14 18 32 Urban/Suburban) Hour of Adjacent 0.49 44% 56% Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. 532-Private School Students 450(o) Weekday, Peak Average 330) 440) 770) (K-12) (General Hour of Adjacent 0.17 43% 57% Urban/Suburban) Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. 565 - Day Care Center Students 3000) Weekday, Peak Average 111 126 237 (General Hour of Adjacent 0.79 47% 53% Urban/Suburban) Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. 710 - General Office 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 15 Weekday, Peak Best Fit (LOG) 6 28 34 Building (General Hour of Adjacent Ln(T) = 0.83Ln(X) 18% 82% Urban/Suburban) Street Traffic, +1.29 One Hour Between 4 and 6 P.m. (0) indicates size out of range. (1) indicates small sample size, use carefully. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 141 Packet Pg. 1294 9.A.5.g Emmanuel Lutheran Church - GMPA/PUDA - Traffic Impact Statement - February 2023 Proposed GMPA/PUDA- ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Ed. Land Use: 550 University/College Description This land use includes 4-year universities or colleges that may or may not offer graduate programs. Junior/community college (Land Use 540) and off -campus student apartment (Land Uses 225, 226, 227) are related land uses. Additional Data The trip generation for weekend time periods varied considerably; therefore, caution should be used when applying weekend statistics. Information describing the weekend activities conducted at universities/colleges was not available. To assist in future analysis of this land use, it is important to specify if transit service was available within close proximity to the site. Acreage, floor space, staff, and parking accommodations varied widely with the populations served and the social and economic characteristics of the area; thus, the number of students may be a more reliable independent variable on which to establish trip generation rates. The sites were surveyed in the 1980s, the 1990s, the 2000s, and the 2010s in Alberta (CAN), California, Oregon, Utah, and Washington. Source Numbers 365, 423, 440, 612, 702, 901, 971 "17, General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 400-799) 449 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page I42 Packet Pg. 1295 9.A.5.g Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA —Traffic Impact Statement — February 2023 Land Use: 630 Clinic Description A clinic is a facility that provides limited diagnostic and outpatient care but is unable to provide prolonged in-house medical and surgical care. A clinic may have a lab facility and supporting pharmacy but typically does not have the equipment and medical personnel available at an urgent care site. A clinic typically offers a wide range of services which makes it distinct from a medical office building that typically houses specialized or individual physicians. Hospital (Land Use 610), free-standing emergency room (Land Use 650), and medical -dental office building (Land Use 720) are related uses. Specialized Land Use Data collected at a single methadone clinic in New Hampshire in 2021 indicate the likelihood of different trip generation rates than for a general medical clinic. The site gross floor area is 4,300 square feet. The vehicle trip counts are as follows: Weekday-283 • Weekday, AM peak hour of adjacent street-39 • Weekday, AM peak hour of generator-45 Weekday, PM peak hour of adjacent street-1 Saturday-189 • Saturday, peak hour of generator-64 Sunday-167 • Sunday, peak hour of generator-56 The methadone clinic generates significantly more trips than a clinic during the morning peak periods and significantly fewer trips during the afternoon adjacent street peak period. Additional Data The technical appendices provide supporting information on time -of -day distributions for this land use. The appendices can be accessed through either the ITETripGen web app or the trip generation resource page on the ITE website (hops.//www.ite.,org/technical-resources/topics/trip. and:parkin�. generation/). 672 Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition • Volume 4 "Ur Trebilcocl< Consulting Solutions, PA Page 143 Packet Pg. 1296 9.A.5.g Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA — Traffic Impact Statement — February 2023 The average numbers of person trips per vehicle trip at the five general urban/suburban sites at which both person trip and vehicle trip data were collected were as follows: 1.4 during Weekday, AM Peak Hour of Generator • 1.7 during Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, one hour between 4 and 6 p.m. • 1.5 during Weekday, PM Peak Hour of Generator The sites were surveyed in the 1980s, the 1990s, the 2000s, and the 2010s in Alberta (CAN), California, Minnesota, New Hampshire, Texas, Vermont, and West Virginia. Source Numbers 440, 734, 878, 926, 972, 1049, 1062, 1073 General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 400-799) 673 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 44 Packet Pg. 1297 9.A.5.g Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA — Traffic Impact Statement — February 2023 Land Use: 926 Food Cart Pod Description A food cart pod is a group of food carts or food trucks congregated in an established location, such as a parking lot, on a semi -permanent or regular basis. A food cart pod typically operates during both the lunch and dinner timeframes. A food cart pod often includes limited covered seating or a dining area. A food cart pod may also include the sale of alcoholic beverages. Additional Data All data were collected in the summer months. Most sites were located along public transit routes and some were accessible by bike or multi -use paths. The independent variable "food cart" is defined for the purpose of this land use as the number of food carts open at the time of the study. The sites were surveyed in the 2010s in Oregon. Source Number 919 W= General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 800-999) 633 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 145 Packet Pg. 1298 9.A.5.g Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA —Traffic Impact Statement— February 2023 PERIOD SETTING DATA PROVIDED BY ITE Specify the Independent Variable, Time Period, and Calculation Method to be used in the calculation of the number of Trips generated in the analysis. To record any notes, click Add Notes above. PROJECTNAME: EMMANUEL CHURCH -PROPOSED PUD -ITE IITH ANALYSIS NAME: Weekday LAND USE INDEPENDENT VARIABLE SIZE LOCATION TIME PERIOD METHOD ENTRY EXIT TOTAL 560 - Church 532 - Private School (K-12) 565 -Day Care Center 710 - General Office Building 630 -Clinic 550 - University/College 928 -Food Cart Pod Seats v 1000 — - - Students �450M' SdWenb v 200 �_..._. -� 1000 Sq. FL GFA v 15 �� 1000 Sq. FL GFA v 3.6 �__ _� Students �300(0) ^I Food Carla "/ 4 General Urban/Suburban. UrbanlSuborban General Urban/Suburban General Urban/Suburban General Urban/Suburban General Urban/Suburban General Urban/Suburban Weekday Average " 0450t1) 450(1) 900(1) - 0 9 -0.- ` Weekday Average-__.____ �558t1) 558(1) 1116(1) 2.48 Weekday Average `� ® 409 409 818 �_______ 4.09 - -- -- Best Fit (LOG) Weekday o„ _. ___._..__ 112 111 223 _________--L`�Z=0.87Ln(X)+3.05 Weekday Best Fit (LIN) 82 82 164 �- T = 35.88 + 34.88-vIr� Weekday .Average v234(1) 234(1) 468(1I 1 56 (�� 1 [Select On, Select One v I 123 123 246 (0) indicates size out of range. (1) indicates small sample size, use carefully. LUC 926 - no ITE data for Weekday time period; Weekday rate assumed 10 x PM peak hour rate (6.16) = 61.6; Distribution 50%:50%, PERIOD SETTING DATA PROVIDED BY ITE Specify the Independent Variable, Time Period, and Calculation Method to be used in the calculation of the number of Trips generated in the analysis. To record any notes, dick Add Notes above. PROJECTNAME: EMMANUEL CHURCH -PROPOSED PUD-ITE IITH ANALYSIS NAME: AM Peak Hour LAND USE INDEPENDENT SIZE VARIABLE 560 - Church Saab v . 000(0) 532- Private School(K-12) Students —� 450 565 - Day Care Center Students v'', 200 710 - General Office Building 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA v 15 630 - Clinic 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA- v� 3.6 550-University/College Studerlb !300(') 926 - Food Carl Pod ( Food Carts 4 (0) indicates size out of range. LUC 926 - no ITE da (1) indicates small sample size, use carefully. qM oeak hour rate a LOCATION TIME PERIOD METHOD ENTRY EXIT TOTAL General Weekday, Weekday, Peak Hou Average Q 42(1) 28(1) 700> Urb 0.07 GenerUrban/Suborban 1, Weekday' Peak Hou Av o2240) 1320) 3560) Ge ebull I,_WeekdW Peak Hou Average83 73 156 Urb General j �. Best Fit (LOG) � � 29 Weekday Peak Hou Weekday 4 33 Urban/Suburban = 0.860+ 1.16 General Weekday, k H Peaou :Best Fit (LIN) `r 14 3 17 Urban/Suburban T=2A9(X) +8.68 GeneralPeak Hou lrban Average 35 10 45 ,Weekday Urb 0.15 General Select One SeledOne v 13 12 25 Urban/Suburban. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 146 Packet Pg. 1299 9.A.5.g Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA— Traffic Impact Statement— February 2023 PERIOD SETTING V DATA PROVIDED BY ITE Specify the Independent Variable, Time Period, and Calculation Method to be used in the calculation of the number of Trips generated in the analysis. To record any notes, click ' Add Notes above. PROJECTNAME: EMMANUEL CHURCH -PROPOSED PUD- ITE IITH ANALYSIS NAME: (PM Peak Hour LAND USE INDEPENDENT SIZE VARIABLE 560 - Church Seats v 000(1) 532 - Private School (K-12) Students g4500) 565 - Day Care Center Students 200 710 - General Office Building 1l>DO Sq. Ft. GFA v 15 630 - Clinic 1000 Sq. Ft GFA v 3.6 550 - University/College Students v 300 926 - Food Cart Pod Food Carls v j 4 (0) indicates directional distribution was not provided in the source document. This study cannot be used for trip distribution. (1) indicates size out of range. (2) Indicates small sample size, use carefully. LOCATION TIME PERIOD METHOD ENTRY EXIT TOTAL General Average v Weekday, Peak Hou �._ g 45(2) 55(2) 100(2) _ UrbaNSuburban._ 0.1 _ v General - - Average_ Weekday Peak Hou �_,__- g 33(2) 44(2) 77(2) UrbaNSuburban -__— _____ 0.17 General WA raveA rave g. 74 Peak Hou 84 158 eekday, UrbaNSuburban ___ .- �-- 0.79 General i Best Fit (LOG) L Weekday' Peak Hou v 6 28 34 Urban/Suburban --- _ -- -- 00.83Ln XN + 1.2299 _G7M General — Best Fft (LIN) v Weekday, Peak Hou vl` — 5 11 16 UrbaNSuburban —� T - 3.53 + 2.98 XAverage General v Weekday, Peak Hou v 14 31 45 Urban/Suburban l - --- 0.15 General Weekday, peak Hou 7 Average N/A N/A Urban/Suburban 25Ie1 6.16 12 13 LUC 926 - Directional Distribution assumed 50%J50% Proposed GMPA/PUDA - ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Ed. —Church Sunday Peak Hour of Generator - PERIOD SETTING Analysis Name: Sunday Peak Hour of Generator Project Name: Emmanuel -Church -Sunday No: Generator Date: 2/17/2023 City: State/Province: Zip/Postal Code: Country: Client Name: Analyst's Name: Edition: Trip Generation Manual, 11th Ed Land Use independent Size Time Period Method Entry Exit Total Variable 560 - Church (General 1000 Sq. Ft GFA 65 Sunday, Peak Average 323 350 673 Urban/Suburban) Hour of 10.36 48% 52% Generator 560 - Church -1 Seats 1000 Sunday, Peak Average 250 260 510 (General Hour of 0.51 49% 61% Urban/Suburban) Generator Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 147 Packet Pg. 1300 9.A.5.g Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA — Traffic Impact Statement — February 2023 Appendix D Collier County Transportation Element Map - TR 3.0 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 148 Packet Pg. 1301 9.A.5.g N W E S 0 1 2 4 6 B mc><mmmff--� Mlles LEGEND INTERSTATE OTHER FREEWAYS AND EXPRESSWAYS OTHER PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL MINOR ARTERIALi, MAJOR COLLECTOR MINOR COLLECTOR LOCAL Q 2010 SMOOTHED URBANIZED BOUNDARY Q 2010 SMOOTHED SMALL URBAN BOUNDARY'. RECOMMENDED BY: COLLIER COUNTY MPO j 16 1e n DATE FLORIDADEPARTMENTOF'+ -^-'-111L TRANSPORTATION DATE APPROVED BY: p FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION DATE FDOT DISTRICT ONE - MAP 131 FEDERAL FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION / URBAN BOUNDARIES - COLLIER COUNTY FrE 10/31/2013 Packet Pg. 1302 9.A.5.g Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA — Traffic Impact Statement — February 2023 Appendix E Collier County Access Management Policy - Table 1 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 1 50 Packet Pg. 1303 9.A.5.g Table 1 Access Classification and Standards Access Facility Features (Median Treatment Minimum Connection Minimum Median Opening Minimum Signal Class and Access Roads) Spacing (feet)(2)(3) Directional Full (feet)(2) Spacing (mile)(2) (feet)(2) 1 Limited Access N/A N/A N/A 1 2 Controlled Access 13201600 1320 2640 0.5 ■ ■ i ... 4 ■ ... ■ .Ai 2rA, P.ivij L ..... E.. N 0.6DQ/.3YQ ......... %0......... 13J2 ■ ....... 0■ Arterials, undivided 6601330 N/A N/A ■ .. ■ ■ 0.5 5 Arterials, divided 330 / 220 440 1320/660 0.5/.25 6 Arterials, undivided 3301220 N/A N/A 0.25 7 Arterials, divided and undivided 125 330 440 0.25 Notes: treater man or equal to 45 mpnness than 45 mph) (1) Section Four of this Policy contains supplementary and more detailed instruction for use of these standards. (2) These minimum spacing standards may not be adequate if auxiliary lanes and storage is required. (3) Single properties with frontages exceeding the minimum spacing criteria may not necessarily receive permits for the maximum number of possible connections. Packet Pg. 1304 9.A.5.g Emmanuel Lutheran Church — GMPA/PUDA —Traffic Impact Statement — February 2023 Appendix F. Project Turning Movements Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 152 Packet Pg. 1305 9.A.5.g Oil Well Rd 7-9 Oil Well Rd Project Turning Movements By Percentage and by AM Peak Hour (Maximum Traffic Potential) 15%; 66 Enter Trips , °'. (15°k; 39) Exit Trips 31 st A.ve NE 31 rt Ave NE 0 50%; 220 15-/; 66 oil Well Rd oil Well Rd e`E l Emmanuel© 1 1 1 Community park 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Collier Mobile 1 1 Auto Repaiq Inc T 1 1 i � 1 i 1 1 1 1 31s1 Ave NE 31 si Ava NE 'I .. 31 xt Ave NE 3W Ave NE - i z m z ! O11 Well Rd 011 Well Rd n 331d Ave NE z rn m z Packet Pg. 1306 9.A.5.g HEX DECISION 2015-49 0 a N d r w 7 3 E E O U t L U L J d 7 C R E E LU Co rn r N O O O O N O N J d Q Packet Pg. 1307 9.A.5.g HEX NO.2015 — 49 HEARING EXAMINER DECISION PETITION NO. PDI-PL20150000262 - Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples, Inc. requests an insubstantial change to Ordinance No. 11-23, the Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples, Inc. CFPUD, as amended, to add temporary sports, religious, and community events, and temporary seasonal sales as permitted accessory uses, to allow the permitted athletic field as an interim accessory use prior to construction of a permitted principal use, to add development standards for the athletic field interim accessory use, to revise development standards for garden plots by removing the prohibition on on -site sales of produce and maximum number of automobiles, and to delete an environmental development commitment. The subject property consists of 21.72f acres located on the south side of Oil Well Road, approximately one quarter mile west of Everglades Blvd. in Section 19, Township 48 South, Range 28 East, Collier County, Florida. DATE OF HEARING: December 10, 2015 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval. FINDINGS: Based on the applicant's written petition, testimony at the hearing of the applicant and the recommendation of staff, the Hearing Examiner finds that the criteria set forth in Sections 10.02.13 E.1 and 10.02.13 E.2 of the Land Development Code has been met and the petition is approved. ANALYSIS: No members of the public were in attendance and staff has received no objections. Seven members of the public attended the neighborhood information meeting with no objections noted. After review of the original submittal, several items of clarifications were agreed to by the applicant and are incorporated within the attached Exhibit A. DECISION: The Hearing Examiner hereby approves Petition Number PDI-PL20150000262, filed by Robert J. Mulhere of Hole Montes, Inc. representing Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples, Inc., with respect to the property as described in the Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples, Inc. CFPUD, Ordinance No. 11-23, for the following insubstantial changes: • to add temporary sports, religious, and community events, and temporary seasonal sales as accessory uses that shall be allowed prior to the construction of the principal use ; • to allow the athletic field as an interim accessory use prior to construction of a permitted principal use; to add development standards for the athletic field interim accessory use; [ 15-CPS-01439/1227925/1 ]36 1 of 2 Packet Pg. 1308 9.A.5.g • to revise development standards for garden plots by removing the prohibition on on -site sales of produce and maximum number of automobiles; and • to remove an environmental development commitment that has been satisfied. Said changes are fully described in the Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples, Inc. CFPUD amendment attached as Exhibit "A", and are subject to the condition(s) set forth below. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A — CFPUD Amendment LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Ordinance No. 11-23, the Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples, Inc. CFPUD. CONDITIONS: 1. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development. DISCLAIMER: Pursuant to Section 125.022(5) F.S., issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. APPEALS: This decision becomes effective on the date it is rendered. Pursuant to Ordinance 2013-25, as amended, a Hearing Examiner Decision may be appealed to the Board of County Commissioners or the Board of Zoning Appeals, as appropriate. Appeals must be filed within 30 days of the date the Hearing Examiner Decision is rendered. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AND EXHIBITS: SEE CLERK OF COURT, MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. DECISIONS OF THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR VARIANCES, CONDITIONAL USES, AND BOAT DOCK EXTENSIONS SHALL BE NOTED ON THE ZONING MAP FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES. J ► Ll Date [ 15-CPS-01439/ 1227925/1 ]36 2 of 2 1JU Mark Strain, Hearing Examiner 1 Appro d or d legality: Scott A..Stone Assistant County Attorney Packet Pg. 1309 EXHIBIT "A" Page 1 of 4 SECTION ONE: AMENDMENT TO EXHIBIT "A", LIST OF PERMITTED USES, ATTACHED TO ORDINANCE NO. 11-23, EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH COMMUNITY FACILITIES PUD Exhibit "A," List of Permitted Uses, Section B, Accessory Uses, attached to Ordinance No. 11-23, Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church Community Facilities PUD, is hereby amended to read as follows: B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses customarily associated with Permitted Principal Uses including but not limited to: 1. Recreational facilities including outdoor play areas and athletic field, administration offices and facilities, and youth recreation centers indoor to support church uses. The athletic field, limited to the location as depicted on the PUD Master Plan as "Football/Soccer Field" and "Softball Field," shall be allowed on an interim basis, prior to the construction of a principal use as listed in paragraph A. of Exhibit A of the PUD. Additionally, sports, religious, and community events (e.g. open air farmers market) are already permitted on the subject property, subject to the issuance of a Temporary Use Permit as set forth in LDC Section 5.04.05, The sum total duration of all such special events shall not exceed 28 days per calendar Year. Temporary seasonal sales (e.g. pumpkin or Christmas tree sales) are also permitted, subject to the issuance of a Temporary Use Permit as set forth in LDC Section 5.04.05 and the time limitation contained therein. These events are allowed prior to the construction of a principal use. 2. Water and wastewater facilities few -serving this CFPUD only. 3. Garden Plots, limited to an accessory use to the Churches and Places of Worship, SIC 8661. Garden Plots shall be allowed on an interim basis prior to the construction of the Churches and Places of Worship. Garden Plots are also an allowable Accessory Use after the construction of Churches and Places of Worship. 4. Any other accessory use and related use that is determined to be comparable to the foregoing by the Board of Zoning Appeals, pursuant to the process outlined in the Land Development Code (LDC). Page 1 of 4 Words underlined are added, words swuek thraugh are deletions H:\2006\20060961WP1PD120151HEX\Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church CFPUD PDl (PL-20150000262) (12-10-2015).docx Packet Pg. 1310 9.A.5.g EXHIBIT "A" Page 2 of 4 SECTION TWO: AMENDMENT TO EXHIBIT "B", DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, ATTACHED TO ORDINANCE NO. 11-23, EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH COMMUNITY FACILITIES PUD Exhibit "B," Development Standards, attached to Ordinance No. 11-23, Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church Community Facilities PUD, is hereby amended to read as follows: G. ATHLETIC FIELD OPERATION The Athletic Field shall only be permitted to be in use between the hours of 7:00 A.M. and 9:00 P.M. 2. If constructed as an interim accessory use, prior to the construction of a principal use, the following standards shall apply, a. The athletic field will only be used during daylight hours and will not be lighted, until such time as a principal use is constructed. b. Temporary sanitary facilities that are ADA accessible shall be provided. c. Use of the athletic field shall be limited to members of the congregation and their guests. d. Up to two (2) on -premises directional signs are allowed. Each sign shall not exceed six (6) square feet in size. e. The authorization for such use shall be valid for five (5) years. If the principal use has not commenced by that time, staff may authorize the continuation of the interim accessory use for another five (5) years. In approving the continuation of the athletic fields as an interim accessory use, the County will evaluate any changes in impacts to adjacent roadways or neighboring properties to determine whether the five-year extension should be rg anted administratively or brought back before the Hearing Examiner. f. Traffic control for peak events will be provided by the owner if it is determined to be warranted by the Collier County Growth Mana ement Division or the Collier County Sheriff's Office. H. GARDEN PLOTS 1. U-Pick or similar commercial farm operation is prohibited. Page 2 of 4 Words underlined are added; words stfuek thfough are deletions HA2006\2006096\WP\PD12015\HEx\Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church CFPUD PDI (PL-20150000262) (12-10-2015).docx Packet Pg. 1311 -- - 9.A.5.g EXHIBIT "A" Page 3 of 4 2. The maximum area for the garden plots shall be limited to 10% of property or ±2 acres. 3. Garden plots shall be located outside the 75 foot perimeter setback areas. 4. Ma�dffiam number- of autemebiles shall be limited te ten at any one time-. 3 4. Access to garden plots and parking areas shall be a gravel surface. 6:5. Temporary sanitary fete facilities shall be provided. -7-.6. A Site Improvement Plan shall be required to be approved by the County prior to the utilization of garden plots. Page 3 of 4 a Words underlined are added; words struek thfeu are deletions H:\2006\2006096\WP\PDI 2015\HEMEmmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church CFPUD PDI (PL-20150000262) (12-10-2015).docx Packet Pg. 1312 EXHIBIT "A" Page 4 of 4 SECTION THREE: AMENDMENT TO EXHIBIT "F", DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS FOR THE PROJECT, ATTACHED TO ORDINANCE NO. 11-23, EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH COMMUNITY FACILITIES PUD Exhibit "F," Development Commitments for the Project, attached to Ordinance No. 1I- 23, Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church Community Facilities PUD, is hereby amended to read as follows: 2. ENVIRONMENTAL A. Conservation/preservation areas comprising a minimum of 0.26 acres are shown on the CFPUD Master Plan that meets the minimum of 0.26± acres required to be preserved by the LDC. .. 11011". ME Page 4 of 4 Words underlined are added; words struek through are deletions H:\2006\2006096\WP\PDI 2015\HEX\Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church CFPUD PDl (PL-20150000262) (12-10-2015).docx Packet Pg. 1313 9.A.5.g HISTORICAL SURVEY WAIVER 0 a N d r w 7 3 E E O U t L U c L J d 7 C R E E Lu Co rn r N O O O O N O N J d co ti N C O d C O O Q Q LL r C d E L v R a E m a Packet Pg. 1314 9.A.5.g Stephanie Karol From: Vovsi, Eman M. <Eman.Vovsi@DOS.MyFlorida.com> Sent: Thursday, May 6, 2021 2:42 PM To: Stephanie Karol Subject: RE: Request for Cultural Resources Search Attachments: Template_102.pdf From: Stephanie Karol <StephanieKarol@hmeng.com> Sent: Thursday, May 6, 2021 2:21 PM To: FMSFILE <FMSFILE@dos.myflorida.com> Cc: Vovsi, Eman M. <Eman.Vovsi@DOS.MyFlorida.com> Subject: Request for Cultural Resources Search The attachments links in this message have been scanned by Proofpoint. Dear Representative: Please see attached Cultural Resources Request along with an aerial. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact us. Thank you for your assistance! Stephanie Stephanie Karol Permitting Coordinator HOLEM+ NTES ENSI IMU I uROdPJP[ARMMUSI PaUBMIsukrtM 950 Encore Way Naples, FL 34110 Direct: (239) 254-2018 Main Line: (239) 254-2000 Facsimile: (239) 254-2099 1 Packet Pg. 1315 9.A.5.g Florida Master Site ,ecti Florida Master Site File TRS Search File Preliminary Investigation of Previously Recorded Cultural Resources To request a search for previously recorded cultural resources, fill in the Township (circle North or South), Range (circle East or West), & Section number(s) of your project area. Township:48S (North or South) Range:28E (East or West) Sections (include all affected): 19 County (include all affected): Collier USGS Quad (if known): Township: (North or South) Range: (East or West) Sections (include all affected): County (include all affected): Township: (North or South) Sections (include all affected): County (include all affected): USGS Quad (if known): Range: (East or West) USGS Quad (if known): Township: (North or South) Range: (East or West) Sections (include all affected): County (include all affected): USGS Quad (if known): Return To: Name: Stephanie Karol Organization: Hole Montes, Inc. Phone: 239-254-2018 Fax: Address: 950 Encore Way, Naples, FL 34110 Email: stephaniekarol(a.hmeng.com Agency/Permit/Project requiring search: Collier County GMD, PUD Amendment Florida Master Site File Division of Historical Resources / R.A. Gray Building 500 South Bronough St., Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0250 Phone 850.245.6440 / Fax 850.245.6439 / Email sitefile(a.dos.state. fl.us P:\FSF\DOCS\MOM\MOM_DOCS\TRSREQUEST 1.DOC Packet Pg. 1316 9.A.5.g p �! �_ � R s U65 y U64 �•s SUBJECT SITE OIL WELL RD (S.R. 858) , . U69 U68 o J m W C - Q J Lu 31STAVENUENE '—� : > Lu Z Qs IMAGE FROM PLEXEARTH DATED: 2019 Q LIMITS OF SUBJECT SITE a W .o EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN �m tr P.N.M. er E °A a z,s, oa 960EncoreWay Naples, FL 34110 EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN ¢ss awm e¢aw a E 1o. m.rawr..t. 2006096A ® ® M.K. ae 4 2t2t tea tae�.wa. t2006096A rrr Ha CHRUCH CFPUD Phone: 239 264-2000 c I CHRUCH CFPUD o COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA �.c. 21zt HOLE MONTES FlorideCertifieateot ENGMEEASfIANNffiMhF= AuthorizationNo.1772 AERIAL LOCATION MAPA. 1 of 1 � �^^ A �AS�NOTED Packet Pg. 1317 9.A.5.g ORDINANCE NO. 2011-23 0 a N d r w 7 3 E E O U t L U L J d 7 C R E E LU Co rn r N O O O O N O N J d Q Packet Pg. 1318 9.A.5.g ORDINANCE NO. 11- 23 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF y COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE ;= APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM THE - ESTATES (E) ZONING DISTRICT TO A COMMUNITY r ', FACILITIES PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (CFPUD) ZONING DISTRICT FOR THE PROJECT KNOWN AS EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH OF NAPLES, INC. CFPUD, TO ALLOW 90,000 SQUARE FEET OF USES TO INCLUDE WORSHIP/CHURCH AND RELATED SOCIAL SERVICES, A 300 PERSON CHILD AND ADULT DAY CARE FACILITY, JOB TRAINING AND VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION, A 450 PERSON PRIVATE SCHOOL; OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, DEVELOPMENT OF SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF OIL WELL ROAD, IN SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 21.72+/- ACRES SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. M 0 Cr-, WHEREAS, Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire of Coleman Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. and Robert L. Duane, of Hole Montes, Inc., representing Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples, Inc., petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: The zoning classification of the real property more particularly described in Exhibit D, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, located in Section 19, Township 48 South, Range 28 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from the Estates (E) Zoning District to a Community Facilities Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) Zoning District for a 21.72+/- acre Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church PUDZ-PL2009-2496 Page I of 2 Revised 6/24/ 1 1 Packet Pg. 1319 9.A.5.g project known as Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples, Inc. CFPUD, subject to compliance with Exhibits A through F, attached hereto and incorporated herein and by reference made part hereof. The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps, as described in Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, is/are hereby amended accordingly. SECTION TWO: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super -majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this a gday of ,U At, , 2011. ATTEST: DW1GI-�,-. CLERK n JBy:Cler 11"�IAk Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: L-L 2 - C_JA__�_ Steven T. Williams Assistant County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: IIL4 W. FRED W. COYLE, ChAdnan Attachments: Exhibit A - Permitted Uses Exhibit B - Development Standards Exhibit C - Master Plan Exhibit D - Legal Description Exhibit E - Deviations from the LDC Exhibit F - Development Commitments CP' 10-CPS-01040'.41 Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church PUDZ-PL2009-2496 Page 2 of 2 Revised 6/24./1 1 'This Hance �ile� with �Fe chary of 's Off ��'• +day of , and acknowledgern that fil' ce'ved t6 day o , By e Packet Pg. 1320 9.A.5.g EXHIBIT "A" LIST OF PERMITTED USES EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH COMMUNITY FACILITIES PUD No building or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: SIC GROUP No building or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: 1. Churches and Places of Worship 8661 2. Child Care Services 8351 Not for profit and operated with a church or place of worship 8351 permitted in this CFPUD 3. Private Schools 8211 Not for profit and operated with a church or place of worship 8243 permitted in this CFPUD (except boarding schools, and military 8244 academies). 8299 4. Social Services, individual and family (activity centers, elderly or handicapped only; day care centers, adult and handicapped only); must be not for profit and operated with a church or place of 8322 worship permitted in this CFPUD. 5. Job training and vocational rehabilitation services not for profit 8331 and operated with a church or place of worship permitted in this CFPUD. Vocational rehabilitation services shall not include uses such as outboard or diesel engine repair that could emit noise beyond the boundaries of the subject property. 6. Medical outreach to the community, to include activities such as administering influenza vaccine, checking blood pressure and conducting blood donation drives not for profit and operated with a church or place of worship permitted in this CFPUD. 7. Single family residential dwellings as an alternative to non- residential uses permitted in this CFPUD. (Also see Exhibit B — Development Intensity) 8. Any other principal and related use that is determined to be comparable to the foregoing by the Board of Zoning Appeals pursuant to the process outlined in the Land Development Code (LDC), however, soup kitchens and homeless shelters are prohibited. Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church PUDZ-PL2009.2496 Last revised: 04-25-11 Page I of 10 Packet Pg. 1321 9.A.5.g B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses customarily associated with Permitted Principal Uses including but not limited to: 1. Recreational facilities including outdoor play areas and athletic field, administration offices and facilities, and youth recreation centers indoor to support church uses. 2. Water and wastewater facilities for serving this CFPUD only. Garden Plots, limited to an accessory use to the Churches and Places of Worship, SIC 8661. Garden Plots shall be allowed on an interim basis prior to the construction of the Churches and Places of Worship. Garden Plots are also an allowable Accessory Use after the construction of Churches and Places of Worship. 4. Any other accessory use and related use that is determined to be comparable to the foregoing by the Board of Zoning Appeals, pursuant to the process outlined in the Land Development Code (LDC). C. Preserve Area Uses: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for the preserve area depicted on the CFPUD Master Plan other than the following: 1. Passive recreation areas such as pervious nature trails or boardwalks are allowed in the preserve area, as long as any clearing required to facilitate these uses does not impact the minimum required area to be preserved. 2. Any other conservation related use that is determined to be comparable to the foregoing by the Board of Zoning Appeals, pursuant to the process outlined in the Land Development Code (LDC). Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church PUDZ-PL2009-2496 Last revised: 04-25-1 I Page 2 of 10 Packet Pg. 1322 9.A.5.g EXHIBIT `B" DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH COMMUNITY FACILITIES PUD Development of the EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH COMMUNITY FACILITIES PUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this Ordinance and applicable sections of the LDC and Growth Management Plan (GMP) in effect at the time of issuance of any development order, such as, but not limited to, final subdivision plat, final site development plan, excavation permit, and preliminary work authorization, to which such regulations relate. Where these regulations fail to provide developmental standards, then the provisions of the most similar district, the Community Facility District (CF) of the LDC shall apply. Table I below sets forth the development standards for land uses within the PUD. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or subdivision plat. TABLE I COMMUNITY FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS A. PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES MINIMUM LOT AREA MINIMUM LOT WIDTH MINIMUM FLOOR AREA PERIMETER SETBACKS MINIMUM FRONT YARD MINIMUM SIDE YARD MINIMUM REAR YARD MINIMUM PRESERVE SETBACK MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES N/A N/A N/A 75 feet east property line 75 feet west and southwest property line 75 feet south property line 75 feet north property line 25 feet 25 feet or perimeter setback whichever is greater 25 feet or perimeter setback whichever is greater 25 feet building zoned height (BH) Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church PUDZ-PL2009-2496 Last revised: 04-25-11 Pagc 3 of 10 Packet Pg. 1323 9.A.5.g MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT 2 stories not to exceed 30 feet zoned building height or 38 feet actual building height; however, the Worship Center shall not exceed a zoned height of 35 feet and an actual height of 42 feet. B. ACCESSORY STRUCTURES FRONT SETBACK 25 feet (see *Note 1) SIDE SETBACK 10 feet or perimeter setback whichever is greater REAR SETBACK 10 feet or perimeter setback whichever is greater PRESERVE SETBACK 10 feet or perimeter setback whichever is greater PERIMETER SETBACK 75 feet MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN ACCESSORY STRUCTURES 10 feet MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT NOT TO EXCEED 1 story, not to exceed 25 feet zoned building height and 30 feet actual BH *Note I Athletic field is permitted in setback area including portion of the existing lake as shown on CFPUD Master Plan; C. STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL USE Residential uses in accordance with the Estates District if non-residential uses are not developed on the subject property. D. DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY 1. A maximum of 90,000 S.F. of total floor area is allowed in this Community Facilities PUD and the number of seats for the Worship Center shall not exceed 1,000 seats. 2. Maximum number of school students is 450. 3. Maximum number of Day Care Center participants is 300. 4. In lieu of permitted community facilities allowed by this CPUD, ten (I0) single family dwelling units are permitted. Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church PUDZ-PL2009-2496 Last revised: 04-25-11 Page 4of10 Packet Pg. 1324 9.A.5.g E. LANDSCAPING Seventy five foot (75') wide buffer areas are required along the east, west and southwest property lines abutting residential development as shown on the CFPUD Master Plan. However, play fields are permitted in a portion of the 75 foot wide buffer area shown on the west and southwest property lines along with an existing lake. 2. A twenty five foot (20') wide Type "D" buffer is required along Oil Well Road and twenty-five foot (25') wide Type "B" buffers are required along the east, west and southwest south property lines as shown on the CFPUD Master Plan. F. LIGHTING (Per Policy 5.1.1 of the Golden Gate Master Plan set forth below): Consistent with public safety requirements, street, recreational and structure lighting shall be placed, constructed and maintained in such manner as to prevent or reduce light pollution. The following standards shall apply: a. If a streetlight or an area light is required, it shall be of the type specified to protect neighboring properties from direct glare. Area lighting shall be shielded such that direct rays do not pass property lines. Low-pressure sodium lamps are encouraged while halogen type lights are discouraged. Where required, the street lamp shall be of the high pressure sodium type and have a "cobra head with flat bottom" style or be fully shielded so that light is directed only downward. Street lamps shall be mounted on a wood pole at a height and wattage recommended by the appropriate electric utility and as appropriate for a rural area. 2. Parking lot lamps shall be low-pressure sodium type lamps and shall be mounted so that they point downward without direct rays extending past the parking lot, building entrance, walkway, or other area intended to be illuminated. b. Where lighting of recreational areas is required, such lighting shall be mounted so as to focus illumination on the areas intended to be illuminated, and to limit the amount of light that extends outside of the intended area. All lighting associated with the Athletic Field shall be turned off no later than 9:30 P.M. G. ATHLETIC FIELD OPERATION The Athletic Field shall only be permitted to be in use between the hours of 7:00 A.M. and 9:00 P.M. Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church PUDZ-PL2009-2496 Last revised: 04-25-11 Page 5 of 10 Packet Pg. 1325 9.A.5.g H. GARDEN PLOTS 1. U-Pick or on -site sales of produce is prohibited. 2. The maximum area for the garden plots shall be limited to 10% of property or f2 acres. 3. Garden plots shall be located outside the 75 foot perimeter setback areas. 4. Maximum number of automobiles shall be limited to ten at any one time. 5. Access to garden plots and parking areas shall be a gravel surface. 6. Temporary sanitary facility to be provided. 7. A Site Improvement Plan shall be required to be approved by the County prior to the utilization of garden plots. 8. The development of garden plots shall not vest the property for PUD sunsetting purposes. I. WALLS 1. A six-foot high wall shall be constructed as shown on the CFPUD Master Plan adjacent to residential development. The wall shall be constructed prior to the utilization of the Athletic Field. Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church PUDZ-PL2009-2496 Last revised: 04-25-11 Page 6 of 10 Packet Pg. 1326 20' Wide T". 'D' forTumune) W,- ------------- r --------% ---------------------------------------------- ------ ----- so L Greo Anse, j II O Mfrrm �n,, 1%W wV be WwWd lef-Of M-W.&4 and if the cf.p. o. W--* 6--'-pw -0 winupw —Wen" — .11 ftopos"tl. i 20,M&F. LAND USE SUMMARY 0. Offlo09I Act o su"t, Acres Percentage5,= S.F. Buildings 2.07 3% 9L utility Structures 0.18 ::,3% Asphalt Pavement 3.75 17.27% Future ParkhW Pvmt 1.00 4.6D % Skiewaft 1.00 4,60% Lake 3.09 14.23% P 11 Are, 0.26 1.19% Retionj Sodded/ 10.37 47.75% Landscoape Areas O Ould IN Aduft TOW 22.72 100.00% i I st— I j Educe0o, ---a— ;.dlky Required Open Spam --n, Aves 2 S.000S.F. 21-72 Acres . 30% - 6,52 Acres 3.09 A- I i CI 1*v Fail. I.IP C-- T 0tal Open Space - 13.72 Acres 63.17 % 30,OW S.F. * includes Lake, Preserve, Recreation, Sodded and Landscaped Areas The Total OW Space proposed is -9 in excess of 30%, land use areas are conceptual In nature and swbo" to final design considerations. Existing Lake 2.17A 1 Required Existing Native Vegetation to be Retained (0-26 1.7 Acres x 0.15 - 0.26 Acres Retained Existing Native Vegetation - 0.26 Acres Maximum total floor area • 90AW 5.1. zjam' T T� -kkw if R- 2E � �..iorurn Primp Structure Height Fmmhbwd Utility Service Is I Zoned height . 30 k� maximum -d*i -Kabla • Actual height - 38 feet maximum for all z 7T- structure& other than Worship Center ro-hip Center TypoUndrt.pe buffer *uMx Zoned height 35 feat maximum Actual height 42 feet maximum lard: E Ea.. {land V h Urq* I.* rid Y—t) — 1. - — Per S.3. �11 WTL 260 & EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL NWiMF3 way L34110 EXHIBIT C I/M. Fnon.: 6&MCW LUTHERAN CHURCH FI-ide C.Akw Or C.F.P.I.I.D. MASTER PLAN iAp-- — — WAYM K/A 2006rw Packet Pg. 1327 9.A.5.g EXHIBIT "D" LEGAL DESCRIPTION EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH COMMUNITY FACILITIES PUD Property Description: Tract 65A, the North 165 feet of Tracts 80 and 81, the South 165 feet of the North 330 feet of Tracts 80 and 81, the North 165 feet of the South 330 feet of Tracts 80 and 81, the South 165 feet of Tracts 80 and 81, and all of Tracts 80A, 81A, 96 and 96A, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, UNIT NO. 64, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 7, Page(s) 64, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church PUDZ-PL2009-2496 Last revised: 04.25-11 Page 8 of 10 Packet Pg. 1328 9.A.5.g EXHIBIT "E" LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM THE LDC FOR THE EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH COMMUNITY FACILITIES PUD Deviation No. 1 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02. H., Fences and Walls to not require a fence or wall along the west, south, and east property lines outside the boundary of the Athletic Field. Walls will be provided adjacent to the Athletic Field as depicted on the CFPUD Master Plan. This Section of the LDC requires that whenever a non-residential development lies contiguous to or opposite a residentially zoned district, said non-residential development shall provide a masonry wall or precast concrete wall or fence. Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church PUDZ-PL2009-2496 Last revised: 04-25-II Page 9 of 10 Packet Pg. 1329 9.A.5.g EXHIBIT "F" DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS FOR THE PROJECT EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH COMMUNITY FACILITIES PUD 1. TRANSPORTATION A. For services and other periods and events of significant traffic generation, as determined by Collier County staff, the property owner shall provide traffic control by law enforcement or a law enforcement approved service provider as directed by Collier County staff, with staffing and at location(s) as directed by the Collier County Transportation Administrator or his designee. B. The development within this project shall be limited to 666 unadjusted two-way, AM peak hour trips and/or 323 unadjusted two-way, PM peak hour trips; allowing for flexibility in the proposed uses without creating unforeseen impacts on the adjacent roadway network. For purposes of calculation of the weekday AM and PM peak hour trip generation for this PUD, the lesser of the weekday AM or PM peak hour trips as calculated in the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Report, titled Trip Generation, 8`h Edition or the trip generation as calculated in the then current ITE Trip Generation Report shall be utilized. C. A potential for interconnection with the residential properties to the west shall be provided if the subject property develops only with single family uses and the conditions for the use of the interconnection are acceptable to the developer and the residential properties to the west. If the subject property is developed without residential uses within four years of the date of adoption, then this commitment shall no longer be deemed applicable. 2. ENVIRONMENTAL A. Conservation/preservation areas comprising a minimum of 0.26 acres are shown on the CFPUD Master Plan that meets the minimum of 0.26f acres required to be preserved by the LDC. B. As part of the first development order application (SDP, Plat or other), the applicant shall provide an updated listed species survey to show the property's proximity to bear or panther habitat (primary or secondary) and indicate if any mitigation is required by the FWC/USFWS. If mitigation is required, the applicant shall coordinate said mitigation with County Environmental Staff members. Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church PUDZ-PL2009.2496 Last revised: 04-25-11 Page 10 of 10 Packet Pg. 1330 9.A.5.g STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) I, DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk of Courts in and for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of: ORDINANCE 2011-23 Which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on the 28th day of June, 2011, during Regular Session. WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 30th day of June, 2011. DWIGHT E. BROCK Clerk of Courts and Clerk Ex-officio � o'Board of County Commissioweg9'�, By: An n ohii, Deputy. C16?k-'' Packet Pg. 1331 9.A.5.g NIM #2 DOCUMENTS 0 a N d r w 7 3 E E O U t L U c L J d 7 C R E E Lu Co rn r N O O O O N O N J d co ti N C O d C O O Q Q LL r C d E L v R a E m a Packet Pg. 1332 9.A.5.g ®® IHM HOLEMONTES a Bowman company August 31, 2023 Nancy Gundlach, AICP, Principal Planner Katherine Eastley, Planner II Growth Management Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Re: Mission Subdistrict GMPA (PL-20200002204) & Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples Community Facilities Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) Amendment (PL-20200002198) Neighborhood Information Meeting #2 HM File No. 2006.096A Dear Ms. Gundlach and Ms. Eastley: Enclosed please find the following documents in accordance with Collier County's Neighborhood Information Meeting requirements: • One (1) copy of Meeting Summary of the NIM; • One (1) original executed Affidavit of Compliance (signed by Robert Mulhere); • One (1) original Affidavit of Publication; • One (1) copy of the Neighborhood Information Meeting Notice advertisement which ran in the Naples Daily News on July 28, 2023; • One (1) copy of Neighborhood Information Meeting Notification Letter sent to Property Owners on July 28, 2023; • One (1) copy of sign -in sheet from the NIM; • One (1) copy of Property Owners List; and • One (1) flash drive with recording of the NIM. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me. Very tiuly yours, HOLE MONTES, A BOWMAN COMPANY Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP Senior Vice President RJM/sek Enclosures as noted. 950 Encore Way, Naples, FL 34110 P: 239.254.2000 holemontes.com I bowman.com H:\2006\2006096A\WP\CFPUD\NIM #2\NG & KE 230931 Itr tr NIM documents,docx Packet Pg. 1333 9.A.5.g NIM SUMMARY Mission Subdistrict GMPA (PL-20200002204) Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples CFPUDA (PL-20200002198) Monday, August 14 at 5:30 p.m. Collier County UFAFAS Extension, Multi -Purpose Room 14700 Immokalee Road, Naples, FL 34120 The NIM was held for the above referenced petitions. The petitions are described as follows: 1) Mission Subdistrict GMPA (PL-20200002204) A Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) to amend the Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Map to add 14.18± acres to the existing Mission Subdistrict, for a total size of 36±. The existing subdistrict allows for a maximum of 90,000 square feet of uses, including a church, childcare services, and a private school. The proposed GMPA retains the maximum 90,000 square foot limitation, and the permitted church, childcare service, and private school uses. The GMPA also proposes to add additional community services, including a maximum of four food trucks, medical office, social services, post -secondary education, and essential and other community -oriented services; and (2) Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples Community Facilities Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) Amendment (PL-20200002198) An amendment to add 14.18+ acres to the PUD and allow additional community services within the PUD. The approved PUD allows for a maximum of 90,000 square feet of uses, including a 1,000-seat church, childcare services with a maximum of 300 attendees, and a private school with a maximum of 450 students. The proposed PUD amendment retains the maximum 90,000 square foot limitation, maximum of 1,000 church seats, and maximum of 450 private school students; but reduces the childcare enrollment from 300 to a maximum of 200 attendees. The PUD Amendment also proposes to add additional community services, including a maximum of four food trucks, medical office, social services, post -secondary education, and essential and other community -oriented services. Note: This is a summary of the NIM. An audio and video recording are also provided. Attendees On behalf of Applicants: Howard Issacson, Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples, Inc. (Applicant) Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, President/CEO, Hole Montes, a Bowman Company Richard Yovanovich, Esq., Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. Norman Trebilcock, AICP, PTOE, PE, Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Terry Cole, PE, Hole Montes, a Bowman Company Jeremie Chastain, AICP, Planner III, Hole Montes, a Bowman Company County Staff - Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA, CSM, Planner III, Zoning Services Katherine Eastly, AICP, Planner III, Comprehensive Planning Four members of the public attended. Two members of the public attended via Zoom. Page 1 of 2 HA2006\2006096A\WP\CFPUD\NIM #2\NIM Summary (8-15-2023).docx Packet Pg. 1334 9.A.5.g Mr. Mulhere started the presentation by introducing himself, the property owner, the other consultants, and county staff. He explained the NIM process, the process for approval, and provided a brief history of the project. The following comments/questions were raised by the members of the public in attendance: Misc. There were questions asked about the proposed access to the property. Mr. Mulhere explained that initially access was proposed to 31" Ave. NE, but that access was removed after feedback received from the public. Mr. Mulhere agreed to include a condition there will be no access to 3111 Ave. NE in the PUD document. Per County standards, there is a second access point proposed to Oil Well Road. The meeting concluded at approximately 5:45 PM, Page 2 of 2 HA2006\2006096A\WP\CrPUD\NIM 92\NIM Summary (8-15-2023).docx Packet Pg. 1335 9.A.5.g AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE I hereby certify that pursuant to Ordinance 2004-41, of the Collier County Land Development Code, I did cause the attached newspaper advertisement to appear and I did give notice by mail to the following property owners and/or condominium and civic associations whose members may be affected by the proposed land use changes of an application request for a rezoning, PUD amendment, or conditional use, at least 15 days prior to the scheduled Neighborhood Information Meeting. For the purposes of this requirement, the names and addresses of property owners shall be deemed those appearing on the latest tax rolls of Collier County and any other persons or entities who have made a formal request of the county to be notified. The said notice contained the laymen's description of the site property of proposed change and the date, time, and place of a Neighborhood Information Meeting. Per the attached letters, property owner's list, and copy of newspaper advertisement which are hereby made a part of this Affidavit of Compliance. (Signature of Applicant) STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing Affidavit of Compliance was acknowledged before me this 15th day of August 2023 by means of x physical presence or online notarization, by Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP Senior Vice President of Hole Montes, a Bowman Company, who is personally known to me 1)( or who has produced as identification. Signatur of Notary Public _ ,' 1 Printed Name of Notary (Notary Seal) IV.STEPHANIE KARO]Florida �' Notary Public - State ofCommission N GG 9F MyComm. Expires Mar Bonded through National Not H:\2006\2006096A\WP\CFP1LJD\N1M H2\Af6davit of Compliance (8-15-2023).doe Packet Pg. 1336 9.A.5.g PART OFTWts U&A7i3tiAY iVEtWORK Published Daily Naples, FL 34110 HOLE MONTES ASSOCIATES INC 950 ENCORE WAY #200 NAPLES, FL 34110 ATTN STEPHANIE KAROL Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WISCONSIN COUNTY OF BROWN Before the undersigned authority personally appeared, who on oath says that he or she is the Legal Coordinator of the Naples Daily News, published in Collier County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being a PUBLIC NOTICE, was published on the publicly accessible website of Collier and Lee Counties, Florida, or in a newspaper by print in the issues of, on: Issue(s) dated: 7/28/2023 Affiant further says that the website or newspaper complies with all legal requirements for publication in chapter 50, Florida Statutes. Subscribed and sworn to before me, by the legal clerk, who is personally Known to me, on July 28th, 2023: otary, tate I, ou f rown My coexpires: t .1 � '-7 Publication Cost: $1,002,96 Ad No: GC11088980 Customer No: 530712 PO *PUBLIC NOTICE - DISPLAY AD 3X10 # of Affidavits: 1 This is not an invoice ENANEY HIY9MAN tary Public of Wisconsin Packet Pg. 1337 9.A.5.g The public is invited to attend a neighborhood information meeting held by Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, Senior Vice President, and Jeremie Chastain, AICP, Planner III of Hole Montes, a Bowman Company, and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire of Coleman Yovanovich & Koester, P.A., on behalf of the applicant at the following time and location: Monday, August 14, 2023 at 5:30 p.m. Collier County UFAFAS Extension, Multi -Purpose Room 14700 Immokalee Road, Naples, FL 34120 The following two concurrent applications have been made to Collier County Growth Management: (1) Mission Subdistrict GMPA (PL-20200002204) A Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) to amend the Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Map to add 14.18± acres to the existing Mission Subdistrict, for a total size of 36± acres. The existing subdistrict allows for a maximum of 90,000 square feet of uses, including a church, childcare services, and a private school. The proposed GMPA retains the maximum 90,000 square foot limitation, and the permitted church, childcare service, and private school uses. The GMPA also proposes to add additional community services, including a maximum of four food trucks, medical office, social services, post -secondary education, and essential and other community -oriented services; and (2) Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples Community Facilities Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) Amendment (PL-20200002198) An amendment to add 14.18± acres to the PUD and allow additional community services within the PUD. The approved PUD allows for a maximum of 90,000 square feet of uses, including a 1,000-seat church, childcare services with a maximum of 300 attendees, and a private school with a maximum of 450 students. The proposed PUD amendment retains the maximum 90,000 square foot limitation, maximum of 1,000 church seats, and maximum of 450 private school students; but reduces the childcare enrollment from 300 to a maximum of 200 attendees. The PUD Amendment also proposes to add additional community services, including a maximum of four food trucks, medical office, social services, post -secondary education, and essential and other community - oriented services. These lands total 36± acres and are located in Section 19, Township 48 South, Range 28 East, Collier County, Florida, on the south side of Oil Well Road, approx, one -quarter mile west of Everglades Blvd. Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Churth of Maples UPUDAmendmentL o� Mo Tea Mlutoa 5uhdk.trictGrowth Management PlanAmmrdmeA " �'^ Location Map Business and property owners, residents and visitors are welcome to attend the presentation and discuss the project with the applicant and Collier County staff. Zoom is being provided as an option to those unable to attend the meeting in person. However, if technical difficulties arise with Zoom, the technical difficulties will not be grounds to invalidate the meeting. If you would like to participate via Zoom or view a video of the meeting, please email us at NeighborhoodMeeting@hmeng.com and we will send zoom invite or a link of the video. You may also email any comments or questions to NeighborhoodMeeting@hmeng.com. Please reference Mission Subdistrict GMPA and Emmanuel Lutheran CFPUD Amendment in subject line. Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, Senior Vice President, Hole Montes, a Bowman Company 950 Encore Way, Naples, FL 34110; Phone: 239-254-2000 Jb.f.C11MPM0A, email: bobmulhere@hmeng.com a ITS m .v U. E E 0 U t L t V c L d t J m 3 c E E w 0 CD T_ N 0 0 0 0 N 0 N J a v w N C 0 M d C 0 O t2 Q lZ a LL r C d E s 0 M a c d E s 0 M Q Packet Pg. 1338 9.A.5.g ,.A I FRIDAY. JULY 2a, 2023 1 NAPLES DAILY NEWS Hospitals C.Mmusd from Page 3A president and chief executive miller, said lu A new, re4asn. 'We arc proud to Ix tccognired by Mist. lhn high-qu.lily cars w'a pro- vide to our conuuunity, slid we arc thrilled to have four And five slays this yeor;' Aulonueel sold. -I want to thank cvcryona on lire entire I —Health team for thdrdedicollon road cannulnne0t m excellent P.denl cote," NCH sold securing cud maintaining A four -star rating Is on,am.0 feat and ,a ,.,a the syslebfs dedication it;pro- viding high-q Edify cnm. `We are 1XIAllaely proud to receive thlspresillilous tecognillan from CMS;' Paul Hfilz, president and chief execu- tive of icer, sold in s ncw's release. "Fills fkuu-slar rating reelfirms our dedlcs- tloo to delivering high -quality, patient - centered care to the Individuals and families we serve:' NCH'c soya Its emphasis nn eonihm- ous Imptravament And humvaque pra- ltccs has been arltlaal lit maintaining Its rulings. 'This recognition iusplres us to keep pushing link dales slid st,lvltig for excellence In all .,peals of Our opao- Ila,s, and is 0 teslani lit la lire hard nark and dudicalon of our exceptional le: nu nr phyueMne, bursox, and stall' who st,IDA every day to deliver the best possible onto to out patients;' Dr. Carloss Oohdom, rider o.imiuuae dill - car, cold. Physicians Regional spokos nuuk Brittany 7'bolnan cold the y tark m- mains focused on providing bill, qual- ity, camyassloume health to -Our unwavering Commitment to our patients and the community Is to continuously Improve live care, our re- admlealon m its kind patio nt expel case we pmvil she sold fo an enroll. Readral"ition rotas are A key me. - sure for patients who Nova chrolde con- diUans, she said. "This has been An Area of focus for the Imaltbcare system, Our quality measures relelod to mad,nbtslols rates .,a Improving, That's real progress and wain going to keep of It, she sold. "fit the area of patient expadonco, wa continue to focus on best practices for communication, and service Including bedside shill rnlarh hourly ro0ndhng And rounding by hospiml leadersblp, she added. What does the national data Indlo.t.7 Tiro rating Involves 46 quality me - sores that CMS publicly reports an Wi imrc.gov and divides them Into the if,,. broad groups. • Mortality; Measures how well bos- pnal. prevent deaths. It Safely orcuir: Massurca flow well hospitals prevent Infeallons and other complications. is Readmission: Measures haw ollen patients are readmlmed within 30 days. • Paliant Experience: Measures holy pn0ents ram their care. It Thilely 6 gllbolive Cum. Measures how well hospitals provide cam lit a timely manner and how well they fol- low evidence -based guldOlnes. A breakdown shriwA that 250 hospl- lots, or 5%, received one stay; 666 has- FRale receved two stars for 14% of its rated hospitals nod B72 hospitals re- celvad three slays fat 19%. Four stars was given 10 803 hospitals 17%of the fault and 483 re- ccivcd five stars for 10% of the total nationwide. A hospital may not bo.bin Waitaki data on all measures, dun to like num- ber o, type of polanls they trout. This year 1,570 hospitals were list rated. Tire public can look up Individual hospitals at Inc websllo at https:// www.medicnre.ga�/ore-compare/ Besides Lac Ha.kh's two eampuaee will, five stare, J0 olhor hospitals In plmlda lire its Ibe lap category will, Roo stars, according to Beakar's Health Review. They are; • Masse Damdin Hospital (Dune- din) • AdvcntHeallh Day(... Detroit (D .ylonn ]]each)Bar..ota Minim lalHospital • Baptist Medical Center - Nelson (penlondina Beach) • Mayo Cllnic Florida (Jacksonville) . Cape Canaveral Hospital (Cocoa Base),) D Motion Plant MAE10 Healthcare Countryside (Safety Harbor) • Ouif Weeza Hospiml (Oulf➢reeze) • Vista Hospital (Melboumal . Ad—ullaolth (Wesley Chopoq Disrupting Dating rIND OUT HOW CALL 1-833-92T-9090 NOW � k www.madelomaicticlub.com di 3)-027.0090 Fl. lda to. 6,nolac � r i FHP: lean dies after losing control on 1-75 follog live -car crash 7omac Rodriguez rail Mr,.t NexnP,•„ VIA loo. ae1110Ax-r 1OAI.A A 25-year-old Hlalcah non died Wednesday aflenmoo after nuthoritles say his sennlmller was Involved In a five -vehicle crash. Accordingtoan Incident report fmm the Florida Highway Patrol, ilia wrack happaned around 3,10 p.m. Wednes- day along bnennma 75, liver Colonial Boulevard, In Fort Myers. The Semitrailer, pulling a Rxl-bed trailer, was traveling south lit the out- side lane of Inielat.te 75, north of Colonel Boulevard, behind a dump truck and two SUvs. Troopers sold A third SUV was Imv- aling South lit the outside canter lano of Interstate 75, north or C.losial Boua- vard. The semllmller rmr-ended the dump truck All'" -fit, causing u chain ormar-and crashes ,fill the two Suva I ... aling obaud or It. Total ors sold crash debris then struck the mar of ilia third SUV, Imv- eling In the middle Ism. Tll o mnn driving tl a samttraller (gad on scene. Troopers reported lire olhet four Involved amlmist ,suffered minor Inluyles. At least 57 people have turd lit Lea County crn.heo this year. Tomas Hooldguar Ise Brear ing/filue Alelus Reporter for the Naples Dolly Netut and The News -Press. You can reach Touas n1 TROrrlg,rez@galr- nelGcom or 772.833.5501. collnect .fill hill, .1, Threads@Iomaafralrllron,ha- ,singroo @rmnasfrobefirnn, Poceboak fNlanosrodrlguexrems and 75ulller @fomasPltoDaflron. LCSO: Unresponsive electrician working on FMB hotel dies Tomas Rodrigues fn,t HHn Nn„-Prear VIA IWAY-I-.aK-A-O An aleettleat workingal. Poll My - Are Beach hotel died Tuesday ahcr- n000, a coworker dlacovering him after elepping ewaymomenmrfly, According 1. a redacted Ireldou re- port from lire 1.0. Cmmly Sheriff's or - Ilea, depdko were called to the parking lot at Dlamomilead Beach Resort, 2000 Baran, Blvd. When they arrived, they contacted the coworker, who Bald he And the vic- tim war. working on on Ingmund elec- tric box, ilia reporting coworker walked .way And found the via([ a roapon- Siva who, he returned, the report hndlc.lcd. He n.tleed lire Victim tens "not mov- Ing and become unresporeive,"aca.rd- ng m the rnport. Ihsl respon pas detioull-dthavic- tim !led shortly afla 1:30 p.m. No fur- ther luformmlon was available Wednesday afternoon, A rcceptiadal for Suntl1mam Hotels & Resuna, the ea ipory mormghng the property, answered lite phone, but the company 0,10 return A request far Con lriCnt- Tooms R.drfl,,,ez Is n 11—kbng/bias Nr'tus Asparter far Ill. Noplel Daffy Hems And The Alass-Press. You can reach Torras at THoddgnez@gnnt- nel (.rank or 772.333-5001, Carl left]. hint, al Thmads @(armsfroheftran, In- slogmm w.,00.drofchron, A.ceboak @loninsmdrlgnentelus and nitiltcr @Ta11ro SPR08e1tra11. The pubim is mulled to Attend a nexJhbomow7 nfamotlon .ecOng held by Robnl J. Mulhere, FAICP, Serfor Vice Pmstdnnl, and Jeremla Chastain, AICP, Planner III al Holo Mantes, a Bownkan Company, and Richard D. Yoverkovkh, Esqusa of Coleman Yovanovlch is Koesfu, P.A. on behalf of the applicant of Ina fallowing limean l location: Monday. August 14, 2023 at 5i30 P.M. Collier County OF/IFAS Exlenslon, Multi -Purpose Room 14700 br mokalee Road, Naples, FL 34120 The lollovrin0 two concunell appacallons have been made to Collier County Omwth Mlmagamenl: (1) Mission Subdistrict OMPA (PL-202000022041 A timwlh Manngenenl Plan Aineadmeld (OMPA) to amend the Fulum Land Use Elamam and Fldure Lam Use Map to add 14.IBt sere. lu the .xlslln9 Mlsslon Subdolrtcl, for A total she of 36c norms. The axis lIn0 suhdL,Irfel allows lot a ma,cknuM o1 00,000 squafa keel of uses,' inclvd.ik A church, ch4dowe services. And a pale Eaton)' The proposed OMPAI mrshis the maxianum 90,000 square loot Ion itatlon, and like parmAled church,'.. cluldcom sorvlae, and private school uses, TIa OMPA also proposes Io Adel oddlti-al co.muntlyserv¢ea, ind dog A maximum al fora load (rucks, medical'. alhca, rvx: social sees, p.aaur sl-secundwy twn, maid essmtitil and olher�. comnl.napwdenled sarvkes: and '. I'll Emmanuel Evannelical Lutheran Church of Nuplos Community Facilities medical Thoaa lands total 36a anon and are located in Section 19, Townslup 40 South, Range '.20 East, Colder Cooni%Florida, oa the south see of On Wes Road, appoex, one -quarter Milo wasp of Ever013de. Raid. s & a E t tl -I Wall Nd sua[a sir[ wn [v-tUlh.l Lva.rm Clnrn.l xyla (rNDaaN,rwma4 � "4:_ Aw NNNalnxnnalNmx„wA•a.aw.an,n la„UD,I NAD Baines, and p,.pany ovmas, rsaideal. and Dun— ono -loom. to Wand the praoenlalwn and discuss the project will, the apphcam and Call,., Caunly Stall. Zoom is being p,ovidad as an Option to !hose unsbin to attend the na"Ang in parson, However, II L.hohal d,dla,Rms apse troth Zan., the laehnlcal ddhoumas will not he grounds 1. Awnlldolo Iha meeting. II you viould like to pantolpam via ZOOM or view A video of the meeting, please email us at HL'19h�dmwlMCdlgf➢d3lWlen0,LON And we will.od zoom ,nude or a link of Ilia video. You may alto erred any comments or questions m Nsmhh?!ha99hteeltti4lnmenn Lan• Plea. rr.(,ence Mlesloo Subdisldcl OMPA and Emmanuel Lutheran CFPUD Amendment in zub,cal line, Raised J Mutton, FAICP, Senor Vim P,naldnlln, Hole Moot... A Bowman Company 950 Encom Way, Napl., Fl. 341 in; Phone: 239.2fd-2000 QmatY OnOnxiYueraTwneng tom a d }r U cc U. a+ c� cG G O U :.i L ci R as t y.a J d 3 C E E W r N 0 CD N O N J a le qIT Go v t� r C O .N d u C O W ci Q Q a [ U_ C d E 0 M r+ r+ a r-� C N V M y.a a Packet Pg. 1339 9.A.5.g ■■ IHM� HOLEMONTES o a Bowman company July 28, 2023 Re: Mission Subdistrict GMPA (PL-20200002204) & Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples Community Facilities Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) Amendment (PL-20200002198) HM File No. 2006.096A Dear Property Owner: Please be advised that Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, Senior Vice President, and Jeremie Chastain, AICP, Planner III of Hole Montes, a Bowman Company, and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire of Coleman Yovanovich & Koester, P.A., on behalf of the applicant have made the following two concurrent applications to Collier County Growth Management: (1) Mission Subdistrict GMPA (PL-20200002204) A Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) to amend the Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Map to add 14.18± acres to the existing Mission Subdistrict, for a total size of 36±. The existing subdistrict allows for a maximum of 90,000 square feet of uses, including a church, childcare services, and a private school. The proposed GMPA retains the maximum 90.,000 square foot limitation, and the permitted church, childcare service, and private school uses. The GMPA also proposes to add additional community services, including a maximum of four food trucks, medical office, social services, post -secondary education, and essential and other community -oriented services; and (2) Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples Community Facilities Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) Amendment (PL-20200002198) An amendment to add 14.18:E acres to the PUD and allow additional community services within the PUD. The approved PUD allows for a maximum of 90,000 square feet of uses, including a 1,000-seat church, childcare services with a maximum of 300 attendees, and a private school with a maximum of 450 students. The proposed PUD amendment retains the maximum 90,000 square foot limitation, maximum of 1,000 church seats, and maximum of 450 private school students; but reduces the childcare enrollment from 300 to a maximum of 200 attendees. The PUD Amendment also proposes to add additional community services, including a maximum of four food trucks, medical office, social services, post -secondary education, and essential and other community -oriented services. These lands total 361 acres and are located in Section 19, Township 48 South, Range 28 East, Collier County, Florida, on the south side of Oil Well Road, approx. one -quarter mile west of Everglades Blvd. (See reverse side for location map). In compliance with the Land Development Code requirements, a Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held to provide you an opportunity to hear a presentation about this petition and ask questions. The Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held on Monday, August 14, 2023 at 5:30 p.m. at Collier County UF/IFAS Extension,14700 Immokalee Road, Multi - Purpose Room, Naples, Florida 34120. HA2006\2006096A\WP\CFPUD\NIM #2\Properly Owner Letter (7-28-2023).docx 950 Encore Way, Naples, FL 34110 P: 239.254.2000 holemontes.com I bowman.com Packet Pg. 1 071 9.A.5.g Zoom is being provided as an option to those unable to attend the meeting in person. However, if technical difficulties arise with Zoom, the technical difficulties will not be grounds to invalidate the meeting. If you would like to participate via Zoom or view a video of the meeting, please email us at NeiuhborlioodMeeting@luneng.com and we will send zoom invite or a link of the video. You may also email any comments or questions to NeighborhoodMeeting_@bmeng_com. Please reference Emmanuel Lutheran CFPUD Amendment and Mission Subdistrict GMPA in subject line. Very truly yours, HOLE MONTES, a BOWMAN COMPANY Robert I Mulhere, FAICP Senior Vice President RJM/sek z oc > � m En o m E Ln E w Oil Well Rd SUBJECT SITE Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples WJA /� CFPUD Amendment & r00 W M Mission Subdistrict Growth Management Plan Amendment HOLEMONTES Location Map H:\2006\2006096AMACPPUMNIM #2\Property Owner Letter (7-28-2023).docx 950 Encore Way, Naples, FL 34110 P: 239.254.2000 holemontes.com I bowman.com Packet Pg. 1341 9.A.5.g NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH OF NAPLES COMMUNITY FACILITIES PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (CFPUD) AMENDMENT (PL-20200002198) & MISSION SUBDISTRICT GMPA (PL-20200002204) MONDAY, AUGUST 14, 2023 AT 5:30PM PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY ***1>Lease be ndv�sed*** The information on this sheet is to contact you regarding this project and future public meetings. Under Florida law, e-mail addresses, phone numbers and certain home addresses are public records once received by a government agency. If you do not want your e-mail address, phone number or home address released if the County receives a public records request, you can refrain from including such information on this sheet. You have the option of checking with the County staff on your own to obtain updates on the project as well as checking the County Web site for additional information. Name Address City, State Zip E-Mail Address M�P5 315i Poic N i ho r s SS2 cJ r j SILc. �. L U L J N 7 E E W 00 N 0 0 0 0 N 0 N J a. v 0 ti N 0 N m c 0 ca .Q a a u- c m E 0 r a E 2 a Packet Pg. 1342 9.A.5.g NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH OF NAPLES COMMUNITY FACILITIES PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (CFPUD) AMENDMENT (PL-20200002198) & MISSION SUBDISTRICT GMPA (PL-20200002204) MONDAY, AUGUST 14, 2023 AT 5:30PM PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY *—PLense be advised*** The information on this sheet is to contact you regarding this project and future public meetings. Under Florida law, e-mail addresses, phone numbers and certain home addresses are public records once received by a government agency. If you do not want your e-mail address, phone number or home address released if the County receives a public records request, you can refrain from including such information on this sheet. You have the option of checking with the County staff on your own to obtain updates on the project as well as checking the County Web site for additional information. Name Address City, State Zip E-Mail Address Ff Atod U L J N 7 E E LU 0 N 0 0 0 0 N O N J a. v 0 ti N C O 2 O C O ca v .Q Q LL C d E t v R .r r a E 2 a Packet Pg. 1343 9.A.5.g 2013 FUSCO FAMILY TRUST 2115 HAMLIN LLC I 2395 HEYDON CIRCLE LAND TRUST 2052 HAMLIN STREET 2115 HAMLIN ST j PO BOX 501 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ; NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i IMMOKALEE, FL 34143 --- 0 ' C i I I C 2540 31ST AVE NE LLC 2545 37TH AVE NE LAND TRUST { 3247 35 AVE NE LLC a 3430 13TH AVE SW 720 GOODLETTE RD N # 304 I 8805 NW 149 TER i NAPLES, FL 34117 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34102 --- 0 MIAMI LAKES, FL 33018 --- 0 ` A J & N L RUBEN REV TRUST ABASCAL, ARTURO A ABL CONTRACTOR CORP I 1277 GRAND CANAL DR ALINA ABASCAL 1840 NW 16TH ST NAPLES, FL 34110 --- 0 408 W 16TH ST ( MIAMI, FL 33125 --- 0 HIALEAH, FL 33010--- 2958 { l ABOVE HOMES CORPORATION ABRAHAM, RUTH NOEL ACOSTA, FIDEL DAVID 6836 IL REGALO CIR I` PATRICK NOEL I ACOSTA, MARIA E=& FIDEL NAPLES, FL 34109 --- 0 MARIE ANGE SAINT CILIEN SOILAGE 3745 29TH AVE NE PATRICK SAINT CILIEN NAPLES, FL 34120--- 2826 234135TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ACOSTA, GEORGETTE DIAZ ACOSTA, JULISSA ACOSTA,CARLOS J i JASIEL SUAREZ 26 DEPAN AVE JAZMIN MOLINA-ACOSTA L 3440 27TH AVE NE FLORAL PARK, NY 11001 --- 0 2565 37TH AVE NE c c NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 c` c c c c ADAMIK, PETER ADAMS, JIMMY & BRENDA ADDERLEY, FRANKLIN C LUDMILA KREK 1228 SANE RD SE 525 NW 15TH WAY 10333 HERITAGE BAY BLVD #1712 DALTON, GA 30721--- 5636 FT LAUDERDALE, FL 33311--- 8847 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ` c r ADIR, MARYLEXIS ADRIEL CORP AGUIRRE,JESUS 3565 29TH AVE NE 1895 NE 198TH TER 706 PINE CREST LN I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 2822 NORTH MIAMI BEAC, FL 33179--- 3118 NAPLES, FL 34104 --- 0 .1 C AIMARO, JASON A & DANA L AIME, DAVILES BIEN ALANIS, JESUS R y 3290 27TH AVE NE ROSELINE PETIT FRERE ANNA L ALANIS NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1564 3352 35TH AVE NE 2101 FAIRMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120---0 I NAPLES, FL 34120 --0 I e I L i ALBINO TR, FRANCINE M ALBRIGHT, JACOB S ALDANA, JORGE Y GUTIERREZ 1 FRANCINE M ALBINO L/R/TRUST DONNA M HUNTLEY 3042 RANDALL BLVD UTD 09/15/98 2425 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 9821 CONNECTICUT ST NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7403 " I BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135---0 + ALENS, SANDRA M j ALFANO, DANIEL & THERESA ALFARO, ZULIMA 2779 35TH AVE NE I I 726 AVENUE T I ( JOSE H ALFARO NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1768 I i BROOKLYN, NY 11223--- 3340 I 3240 29TH AVE NE i NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3203 Packet Pg. 1344 9.A.5.g ALFONSO, IDALMIS ALFONSO, JOSE CARABALLO ALFONSO, LAZARO M 1925 N MONTICELLO AVE ODALYS ALFONSO PEREZ MABEL LAGO CHICAGO, IL 60647 --- 0 2407 RANDALL BLVD 2342 HEYDON CIR E NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ALMAGUER BATISTA, ALCIDES 1 ALMANZA, ALFREDO & SANIUANA ALMODOVAR, ANTONIO 2585 29TH AVE NE i I 218114TH AVE NE LISA EMILYTHOMAS NAPLES, FL 34120---0 i NAPLES, FL 34120--- 5451 I 3225 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ALONSO, GUILLERMO ALONSO, JOSEPH & MICHELLE ' I ALONSO, LUIS J 3210 EVERGLADES BLVD N 2645 37TH AVE NE I 3740 NW 13TH ST f NAPLES, FL 34120--- 2823 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7492 i , i MIAMI, FL 33126--- 2623 ALONSO, RODNEY ALSLIMAN, MOHAMMAD I ALTMAN, ROBERT A & MELINDA L JUANA RAQUEL GUTIERREZ BARRERA I 1N249 BLOOMINGDALE RD 2420 39TH AVE NE 2644 37TH AVE NE CAROL STREAM, IL 60188--- 2817 I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7402 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ALTUHOV, BENJAMIN & MARIA ALUSMA, CLAUDETTE & WILSON ALVARADO JR, ALPHONSO 2970 RANDALL BLVD 2018 FAIRMONT LN 278124TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 t t ALVARADO, ANA ALVAREZ, ANAIS ALVAREZ, ANDREA DANIEL CERRADA ALEX PINTO 2775 29TH AVE NE 3385 35TH AVE NE KEVIN ALEXIS PINTO NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7413 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 367133RD AVE NE c NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ALVAREZ, ANDY ALVAREZ, COSME D & MARIA I ALVAREZ, IDAEL VANESSA DIAZ 2840 29TH AVE NE 3640 24TH AVE SE 3245 39TH AVE NE I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7414 NAPLES, FL 34117 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I � ALVAREZ, JOSE PEREZ ALVAREZ, JUAN ALBERTO ALVAREZ, JUAN ALBERTO ISABEL HERNANDEZ JUAN CARLOS ALVAREZ I JUAN CARLOS ALVAREZ 282137TH AVE NE I 1555 W 44TH PL#343 1555 W 44TH PL#343 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 HIALEAH, FL 33012---0 HIALEAH, FL 33012 --- 0 , i j ALVAREZ, MARIAG MORENO ALVAREZ, OSCAR i AMAYAJR, RAFAELA j JAIME LOPEZ LEON 2840 29TH AVE NE 1827 SW 21ST STREET #1 2488 37TH AVE NE I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33315 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I I AMAYA, ERNESTO RODRIGUEZ AMAYA, SANTOS V AMERINE, BRITTANY 2340 27TH AVE NE ! I 2665 35TH AVE NE I j DWAYNE WIERCINSKI NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i NAPLES, FL 34120---1406 1928 WELLINGTON ST I i I I NAPLES, FL 34120---0 Packet Pg. 1345 9.A.5.g AMEY, JENNIFER AMEY, SCOTT ALAN I AMMERMAN, RACHEL 3440 29TH AVE NE MARIE MONDE AMEY 1 2725 41ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1586 2473 HEYDON CIR E i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 C ANDERSON, MELISSA L & GARY J ANDERSON, ROBERT A I ANDERSON, TAMI MARIE 2246 VERMONT LN NANCY JANE ANDERSON i 2027 PARSON STREET i NAPLES, FL 34120 0 2780 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 u I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7412 l s ANDRACA, WILLIAM & YENEY ANDRE, VALANCIA ANEETA SHAILESH LIVING TRUST I t 3944 EVERGLADES BLVD N 2118 CLEMENTINE STREET 3029 NEWPORT DR NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i SPRINGFIELD, IL 62702 --- 0 s i s .t ANNA M SAMMS REVOCABLE TRUST ANNONI, CATHERINE ( ARANGUREN, JUAN C HERNANDEZ i 2114 SATSUMA LANE I BARKLEY, ROBERTA I CRISTINA ZAMORA NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 17476 BRILL DR 3370 31ST AVE NE _ I CLINTON TWP, MI 48035--- 2313 i NAPLES, FL 34120---2930 II I { ARCISZEWSKI, SCOTT ARENA, MICHAEL R ARGUEDAS, CLAUDIO R ORMENO u 299135TH AVE NE 176 ILYSSA WAY 3245 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 STATEN ISLAND, NY 10312 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 c c c c J ' c ARGUELLES, LEYDIER ARGUETA, FEDERICO & ROSE M _ ARGUETA, SIRIS XIOMARA c 2027 SAGEBRUSH CIR ` I 2620 39TH AVE NE 2197 CLEMENTINE ST "p NAPLES, FL 34120---0 I NAPLES, FL 34120---0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 e e a r c ARIAS DEOLIVARES, EVANGELINA ARIAS, DAX OMAR PECHO `' ARIAS, DAX OMAR PECHO 2430 35TH AVE NE 11 5290 GOLDEN GATE PKWY I. I 5290 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 14 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1403 NAPLES, FL 34116 --- 0 I. I NAPLES, FL 34116 --- 0 t 0 s t ARIZMENDI, MICHAEL & LYNDSEY i ARPAIA, BRIAN R ( ARREDONDO, R CARLOS GARCIA 2442 RANDALL BLVD I TAYLOR JAE LANNING I 3470 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3572 I I 2391 HEYDON CIR E I I NAPLES, FL 34120---0 = NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 u ARREGUIN, ANTONIO ARREGUIN, MIGUEL I ARREGUIN, RICARDO s 2925 37TH AVE NE KAREN VIRVIESCAS RUIZ I 254124TH AVE NE < NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 2130 CLEMENTINE ST I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3555 3 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 a t ARRIETA, FRANCISCO ALVARADO ASTHAPPAN, JOSEPH P AURIA INC s ANA ACUNA ( AMMINIKUTTY JOSEPH i I 5091 GENOVA ST I 90 25TH AVE NW I JIBEY ASTHAPPAN i AVE MARIA, FL 34142---0 s NAPLES, FL 34102---6010 i 2224 DANCY ST j NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 Packet Pg. 1346 9.A.5.g AURORA 14 LLC AURORA14 LLC AUST, WILLIAM 2155 KHASIA POINT 2155 KHASIA PT CAROL GIORGI NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34110 --- 0 5863 PRIVATE RD ' PO BOX 242 C LAHASKA, PA 18931 --- 0 c AVDYLLARI, BARDHYL i AVILA, GILBERTO TORO AVILES GARAY, FELIX A 2571 GOLDEN GATE BLVD E i DAYRIS SOCARRAS ' j 2080 FAIRMONT LN i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 j 3315 31ST AVE NE I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4573 u FL 34120--- 2931 iNAPLES, AVILES, FLOR A MORALES i AVILES, JUAN R & ANA L I , AVILEZ, ALLAN & MELISSA DIOGENES ARRIETA 1232 CYPRESS WOODS DR { 3270 29TH AVE NE C 3335 RANDALL BLVD I I NAPLES, FL 34103 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34120---0 s NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I s I C s AVRAMIS, ANA MARIE AYALA, PEDRO & ALMADELIA AYBAR, NELSON A & SANDY E i JESSICA M HEMENWAY 3361 RANDALL BLVD 2088 FAIRMONT LN s 8766 CAVANO ST E NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 _ NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 AZUA, ROGELIO & MAGDA ELENA BAADER, FRANK BABINEAU, MARK STEVEN & TRACY u u 2725 315T AVE NE 3256 33RD AVE NE 2385 37TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1560 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7541 C e C C C • C C C BALASA, ALEXANDRU BALDWIN, MATTHEW JAMES J� ( BALLARD, DOUGLAS R &THERESA M _ OLGA I BALASA DIANE CAROL BALDWIN 2266 HEYDON CIR W 3570 27TH AVE NE 2892 ARMSTRONG DR I NAPLES, FL 34120-4584 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 LAKE ORION, MI 48360 --- 0 e I a r l BALMACEDA, MARIA BALON, DANIEL RODRIGUEZ BANOS, YORKY LINARES 550 SW 115TH AVE UNIT 904E MARILYN CRUZ VALIDO IRAIMY GARCIA BORROTO MIAMI, FL 33174 --- 0 ( 2482 EVERGLADES BLVD N 371135TH AVE NE i I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 0 s c BANUELOS, LEOBARDO ( _ BAPPERT, JOHN W & BREANNE H BARACK, GEORGE 1 2497 29TH AVE NE 2166 CLEMENTINE ST ( JANICE NIXON NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7553 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I KAREN M LAPOINT s ` 4515 BRUENING DR I PARMA, OH 44134 --- 0 u i s BARATTA, GEORGE & LAURA BARBA, YOEL ZEQUEIRA BARBARA F JONES TRUST s 1890 ALAMEDA DR 3965 EVERGLADES BLVD N 3000 COUNTY BARN RD i NAPLES, FL 34120- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120---0 ` NAPLES, FL 34112--- 5438 3 I� I BARBARA, ACDEL I I BARBOSA, AMELIDA & EDMUNDO I BARKES, DEBRA A 2625 39TH AVE NE I I 891 21ST ST SW JAMES M CARTER NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34117--- 4163 5690TAYLOR RD i i HARTSVILLE, IN 47224 --- 0 Packet Pg. 1347 9.A.5.g BARLATIER, ALOURDES EVANSTE PIERRE 2584 41ST AVE N E NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BARRON, THOMAS A & ROANNE 285 TADS TRAIL OLDSMAR, FL 34677---0 BARTE, MELA MARK EDWARD BLAKEMORE 2226 VERMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BASTIDAS, FERNANDO TATIANA ZAYAS 2087 VERMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BATISTA, RAMON ALINA CASTELLANOS 3470 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BAZAN, ISRAEL ZAYAS FRANKLIN 0 DIAZ 2515 37TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BEAUDOIN, ALEXANDRA NICHOLAS METAYER 89 GOVE ST MANCHESTER, NH 03102 --- 0 BEDOYA, MAURICIO A JULIANA A OROZCO 2460 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BELCHER, WILLIAM VICTORIA GILLUM 2450 HEYDON CIR E NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BELVILLE, TRISHA BETH 2280 DANCY ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BARRERA, LAURA SAYONARA GUSTAVO HUMBERTO PERILLA 2696 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BARROSO, BARBARO G ANA MARIA LIRIANO 3935 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120--- 2928 BARTON, D R PO BOX 105 EVERGLADES CITY, FL 34139---105 BATISTA JR, PAULO J & NANCY S 101 FAWN LAKE DR DINGMANS FERRY, PA 18328--- 4136 BAUTISTA, AMANDA 1948 WELLINGTON STREET NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BEAMAN, MARK D MARY ELLEN MILLS 2065 MANDARIN LN NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4555 BEAUMONT, PAUL G & CLEOFINA M 2961 24TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---3545 BEDOYA—PENA, LUIS FERNANDO 1846 ALAMEDA DR NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BELL, MITCHELL N 803 E 15T AVE NEW SMYRNA BEACH, FL 32169 --- 0 BENAVIDES, FERNANDO RENATA DOROTA BENAVIDES 2264 DANCY ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BARRERA, OSCAR DE JESUS BELLO TANIA ROLDAN SANTIESTEBAN f 2675 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BARSOUM FAMILY LIVING TRUST 2250 VERMONT LN II NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 1 BASSANO,JOHN &JOSEPHINE 2120 PARSON ST NAPLES, FL 34120---0 BATISTA, PETER & MIREYA 20504 SW 127TH PL MIAMI, FL 33177--- 5104 BAUTISTA, VERONICA RAMIREZ 1 2865 37TH AVE NE 1 NAPLES, FL 34120---7433 t t BEAM, THOMAS JAMES i SHANNON MARIE BEATTY 2435 37TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 c 1 1 BEDARD, DWI NELL & ALISSA 3170 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 446 J. BELANGER, KENNETH RICHARD LYNN ANN BELANGER 1908 WELLINGTON ST NAPLES, FL 34120---0 1 r BELOSHKURENKO, NAUM & INNA I I 2219 DANCY ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BENIMADHO, ARMAND PHARMASING 11221 NW 46TH LN i DORAL, FL 33178--- 4349 I Packet Pg. 1348 9.A.5.g BENITEZ, CARLOS IVAN COLLAZO KARLA ROSUAN GOMEZ MALDONADO 2407 HEYDON CIR E NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BERMAN, MATTHEW D & CARRIE L 5355 CORAL WOOD DR NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 BERRY, CHRISTOPHER W j KONRD M BERRY 4327 SW 125TH LN 4327 MIRAMAR, FL 33027---6013 BETANCOURT, JAVIER ANDRES 27816TH AVE SE NAPLES, FL 34117 --- 0 BIDAJOSEPH, ELMO 2017 FAIRMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BILARDELLO, DANN J 2590 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120--- 5560 BLACKFORD, BURCHELL & KERRYANN 1956 PARSON STREET NAPLES, FL 34120---0 I BLANCHETTE, MICHAEL & SHARON 2057 FAIRMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BLANKENSHIP, CHAD MYCHAEL I LAUREN WILSON BLANKENSHIP 2259 DANCY ST i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 II i BLOOM, JAMES S I 6072 POLLY AVE NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 i i i BERENS, ROSS ALAN BERGER, DANNY & ALEXANDRA 2382 ORCHARD ST 2051 SAGEBRUSH CIR NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ; BERMUDEZ, MARISA C BERMUDEZ, VICTOR R & JESSICA BERMUDEZ HELEN A=& SERGIO i 2785 29TH AVE NE 2460 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7540 BERTEMATTI, ANDRES A & MARKIA I i BESSE, RICHARD L & BRIDGET 9721 SW 32ND ST I 144 ROYAL PALM DR STE 218 MIAMI, FL 33165--- 3027 I MARCO ISLAND, FL 34145--- 2010 I BEVARS,JANICE R BICKEL, PHILLIP GARY ATKINSON SHIRLEY MAR BICKEL 2725 37TH AVE NE 2445 39TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---7458 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7403 BIEGEL,JACQUELINE BIER, RIVKA 681 CAMBRIDGE RD JOSEPH VAN METER PARAMUS, NJ 07652--- 4223 2111 HAMLIN ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BIRD, GREGORY M & COLEEN M BLACKBURN, DONNA L 2313 TANGERINE LN 3730 33RD AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 466 i BLACKFORD, ORAL & NADIEN BLACKWOOD, MAUVA ELAINE 2040 HAMLIN ST NEREKAJ GORDON NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 2243 VERMONT LANE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 .I BLANCO, MILAGROS l BLANDON, BENITO 1987 FAIRMONT LN I I 2041 FAIRMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I i I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4574 I BLOCKER EST, BRUCE BLONDO, ALFREDO DEAN M BLOCKER PR I MIRELLA SERINO 1303 NEW MARKET RD W 13430 35TH AVE NE IMMOKALEE, FL 34142--- 2253 ( NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BLUME, STEPHEN L BOBAK, MICHAEL FLEET 2820 39TH AVE NE �`'' LINDSEY MICHELLE BOBAK NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i 1983 FAIRMONT LN r.� I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 Packet Pg. 1349 9.A.5.g BOBAY, JEFFREY D & STEPHANIE M BOBOESCU, ION & LAVINIA C BOCK, CHRISTOPHER & ELIZABETH 2076 SAGEBRUSH CIR 2279 HEYDON CIR W 2620 41ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4568 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4585 I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 2802 BOERO, LEYSITH i BOHM, SCOTT BOLLTTR, ROBERTO 349131ST AVE NE i SHELLY MUSIEL % ORANGETREE ASSOCIATES NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 2370 HEYDON CIRCLE E i PO BOX 855 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i I i BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34133 --- 0 80NACC1, ANTHONY & ELLEN 1 1 I BONIN, CHRISTINA L i BORCHERS, JOHN & JACQUELINE 2223 VERMONT LN I 67 MOUNTAIN HILL ROAD 3635 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 GROVESNORDALE, CT 06255 --- 0 i I (I I{{I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1512 BORGES, MANFRED & DONNA J 11 l BOTERO, JUAN BRWEN, CLIFTON ONEIL 9641 CAMPBELL CIR LINA ALMANSA NEREKA JADE GORDON NAPLES, FL 34109--- 4506 4032 WATERVIEW LOOP 2145 CLEMENTINE ST WINTER PARK, FL 32792---0 ! NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BOWERS, JOY LYNN BOWMAN, CHRISTOPHER D BOYD, BECKY J 2322 HEYDON CIR W MICHEALE BOWMAN 2113 CLEMENTINE STREET NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4586 2091 SAGEBRUSH CIR NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4569 BRAKE, PETER DAVID !' ( BRANCATO, VINCENT i BRASSE FAMILY LIVING TRUST COURTNEY ELIZABETH BRAKE I 2075 PARSON STREET 2310 TANGERINE LN 2213 CARA CARA WAY NAPLES, FL 34120---0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BRAVO, CARLOS R & ROSE M 1 } BRETOS, TOMAS D & EULALIA C BRIDGES, BENJAMIN PAUL 3326 FLAGLER AVE I 1220 SW 143RD AVE ANNIE HOBGOOD BRIDGES KEY WEST, FL 33040 --- 0 MIAMI, FL 33184--- 3204 2470 HEYDON CIR E NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 / BRIMMER, LOGAN JON EATON BRISC, IOAN & CORNELIA BROMLEY, WILLIAM EARLE NICOLE BRIMMER 912 N GIBERT CT I 2110 CLEMENTINE STREET 3385 RANDALL BLVD RIDGEFIELD, WA 98642 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120---0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BROWN, AUDREY r BROWN, FRANCINE BROWN, ROBERT ANDREW 4010 EVERGLADES BLVD N I 2284 DANCY ST 419 WESTSIDE BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120--- 2901 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 CATONSVILLE, MD 21228--- 4062 BROWN, ROBERT L & DORIS J BRUCKER LIVING TRUST BRUNA, JUAN M & BLANCA 2037 MANDARIN LANE I i 1980 PARSON ST I JUAN C BRUNA NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I ANGELA M BRUNA j i 860 E 38TH ST I • HIALEAH, FL 33013--- 2827 Packet Pg. 1350 9.A.5.g BRYAN W PAUL FAMILY LTD PTNSHP BRYANT, BENJAMIN ISAIAH BT INVESTMENTS 01 LLC PO BOX 2357 BARINA MARQUET BRYANT 2400 OIL WELL RD LABELLE, FL 33975 --- 0 2835 35TH AVE NE i NAPLES, FL 34120 -0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BUCCI, JOSEPH H & LOUANN BUCHMAN, JEREMY BUENTELLO, DANIEL SIMON 2477 ALYDAR DR CHANTEL BUCHMAN ISABELLE BUENTELLO WEXFORD, PA 15090 --- 0 I 2107 SAGEBRUSH CIR I 2117 CLEMENTINE STREET NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BUILES, ANDRES & STEPHANIE I BUONANTUONO, DOMINICK C BURKETT, GRACIELA GRIMALDA 1955 FAIRMONT LN ELLEN M BUONANTUONO JAMES WENDELL BURKETTJR NAPLES, FL 34120 0 I 2290 HEYDON CIR W j 2461 HEYDON CIR E I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BURKETT, ROMONA & TIMOTHY ) BURTON, RAE ANN 1 I BUSSARD, DANIEL A & AMANDA D 2071 SAGEBRUSH CIR I 2530 31ST AVE NE 2995 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4569 I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 435 NAPLES, FL 34120---0 I l._ BUTERA, ANTHONY & MARY P I BUTLER, NANCY LYN t CABALLERO, CYNTHIA 4594 HIDDEN HOLLOW ROAD STEPHEN LEROY BUTLER 1511 N 70TH WAY HAMBURG, NY 14075 --- 0 2092 PARSON ST HOLLYWOOD, FL 33024 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 CABRERA, ANA D ( CACHARES, LINNETTE l CACHO, DANILO C 79 SUMMER ST 1 I 2061 HAMLIN ST I 2485 OIL WELL RD SALEM, MA 01970--- 3044 NAPLES, FL 34120 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1472 CADAVID,ALEJANDRO CAFFREY SR, LEWIS J & MARLENE I I CAIN, MICHELLE LYNN JASON JIMENEZ 2298 HEYDON CIR W I KENNETH FORREST 5201 RISING COMET LANE NAPLES, FL 34120---4584 3630 29TH AVE NE LAKE WORTH, FL 33463 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I i CALCIAN0, MICHAEL D ( CALDERON, JOSE L f CALDWELL, JEREMIAH DANIELA S CALCIANO MARIA X ROMERO I I 2438 HEYDON CIRCLE E 3685 31ST AVE NE 2068 SAGEBRUSH CIR NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ' CALIGUIRE, THOMAS JOHN CALLUE, WINSTON R CALVO, JORGE A TONI MARIE ADLRIDGE ( 5555 MORNING CREEK CIR I JEANNETTE CALVO 2295 DANCY ST I ATLANTA, GA 30349 --- 0 4703 S LISBON CT NAPLES, FL 34120 0 I j AURORA, CO 80015 --- 0 CALZADILLA, A LEONEL CARRILLO CAMACHO, ERICK i CAMACHO, VICENTE YAMILEIDIS GARCIA LIRIANO I YAIMA FINOL ; 220 1ST ST NW i 3480 35TH AVE NE ' 3345 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 -0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1587 Packet Pg. 1351 9.A.5.g CAMARGO, IDANIA CABRERA CAMILLE, JEAN DIEUMES CANCINO, MAYKOL ]BRAIN LOPEZ ISRAEL RODRIGUEZ DELGADO NATACHA CAMILLE CARIUS I ANA M CANCINO SANCHEZ 2646 39TH AVE NE 2545 RANDALL BLVD ! 3330 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120---0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 ! NAPLES, FL 34120--- 5548 CANE, SEBASTIAN D 2817 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4541 CARABALLO, SIOMALY OTERO JAIME R SOTO GONZALEZ 2219 VERMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 CARBALLO, ORLANDO & GLADYS 2635 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120--- 5566 CARDENAS, JESUS A 3165 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1523 CARDOSA, MARCIO A MARICELA CARDOSO 2541 PICKARD LN NORTH PORT, FL 34286 --- 0 CAROLYN G PHIPPS TRUST 2106 SATSUMA LN NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4558 CARRERA,JANIRE 2016 SAGEBRUSH CIR NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4568 CARRILLO, MICHELLE 2561 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 CANEL, JACKENSON PIERRE FRADNA SEPPE j 2941 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I I I, CARBALLO JR, ORLANDO & YENEISY 2625 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120--- 5566 CARCAMO, SERGIO & FRANCIS A 2620 29TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7408 CARDENTEY, ALEXIS VIERA 3740 68TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I CARDOZO, ROBERTO C OLARTE MILAGROS MOSQUERA DE OLARTE 2189 CLEMENTINE ST l NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 _i CARRASCO, DAYSI VICTOR RENE BARRAGAN PEREZ 1935 WELLINGTON ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 CARRILLO, CONSTAIN 8104 SW 136TH PL MIAMI, FL 33183--- 4187 I CARRINGER, JENNIFER N & MARK) 2153 FAIRMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4576 II CARTER, BRANDON W & RACHEL B i CARTER, KENNETH BRIAN 2072SAGEBRUSH CIR i i TRACEY JEAN CARTER NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 2405 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 CAPOBIANCO, JOHN VINCENT JENNIFER LYNN CAPOBIANCO 2100 PARSON ST NAPLES, FL 34120---0 CARBALLO, ORLANDO 2635 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 5566 CARDENAS, ARTURO & WHITNEY 2248 DANCY ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 CARDONA, ELIZABETH JUAN ARANGO CHALARCA 320 NUTLEY ST SW VIENNA, VA 22180 --- 0 CARLYLE, KEVIN TRICIA YOUMANS 4566 N LAKE DR SARASOTA, FL 34232 --- 0 CARRAZANA, HUGO RAMON RAQUEL CASTEDO ORTIZ 2003 SAGEBRUSH CIR NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 CARRILLO, HECTOR L GUADARRAMA ELVIRA MARTINEZ 2214 CARA CARA WAY NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 CARTAYA,RAFAELI 4280 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 CARVAJAL JR, JORGE A LOURDES CARVAJAL 2765 37TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7458 Packet Pg. 1352 9.A.5.g CARVER DALE S CASASIERRA REALTY LLC CASEY, JOHN R & MARIA 15679 S BLACKFOOT ST SHOO PINE TREE RD 3280 EVERGLADES BLVD N OLATHE, K5 66062--- 3672 PARKLAND, FL 33067 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I C 0 s CASTANO, ELIZABETH R CASTELJR, CLARENCE R CASTELLANO, YOANDY VAZQUEZ 3680 33RD AVE NE KELLY A CASTEL ' ROSA SANCHEZ GARCIA NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1588 ; 31 OLD SCHOOLHOUSE RD I 2385 27TH AVE NE u NEW CITY, NY 10956---0 I I NAPLES, FL 34120- 0 . I• � II s E CASTELLON, TERESA L i CASTILLO, GABRIEL & MARIA I CASTILLO, JOSE M & ANGELICA YOLANDA BARRIOS i I 5406 TRAMMEL ST i 3510 29TH AVE NE s 4318 CICADO WAY I NAPLES, FL 34113---7863 I I NAPLES, FL 34120- 0 s LAS VEGAS, NV 89121- 0 I I ►� C s CASTILLO, TARA LYNN & OMAR M I CASTINEIRA, MANUEL CASTRO REVOCABLE TRUST s 1960 PARSON STREET 2785 27TH AVE NE 5861 WAXMYRTLE WAY NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34109 --- 0 _ i { CASTRO, GEORGE V CASTRO, RENE & ZENEYDA ( CEDENO, GUILLERMO HERNANDEZ 7211 MIRAMAR PKWY I 1481 16TH ST NE ; IVETTE CALDERIN G MIRAMAR, FL 33023--- 5932 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 4040 EVERGLADES BLVD N .: ..: NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 c c CEKO, LOUIE &TANYA CELIS, KAYLA & DAVID CEPEDA, ALI R VALBUENA c "p 2840 EVERGLADES BLVD N 2039 SAGEBRUSH CIR DANYELA C SILVA NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 284137TH AVE NE e NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 e a r c CERRA, MARIA TERESA CERVANTES, YAUMEL CESAR, MARIE L JUAN A LOPEZ GLORYSELL FIORES 242131ST AVE NE 2644 27TH AVE NE 3234 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 • 0 s s CEVALLOS, FRANCISCO FABIAN CHACON, ENNOVY T MELGAREJO j CHAGNON REVOCABLE TRUST ANYELITDADNEY RIANO RODRIIGUEZ RAM A LOPEZ VELAZQUEZ 1 3575 27TH AVE NE 1988 PARSON STREET I 2477 HEYDON CIRCLE E I NAP I LES, FL 34120--- 1557 s NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 u s i CHAMBERLAND, ROLAND J ( CHANG, FREDERICK CHARLES MARIE L £ 2665 29TH AVE NE I 2309 FEATHER BROOK LN ( LEONCE SYLVESTRE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7409 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i 5419 19TH PLSW j I NAPLES, FL 34116---0 a s CHARLES, CEDERNE I CHARLES, EMMANUELLA GUERRIER CHARLES, GUERDA C s MISLAINE GASPARD ! 3264 33RD AVE NE I 3210 BERMUDA ISLE CIR #1218 r 5419 19TH PLSW I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34109 --- 0 Q NAPLES, FL 34116---0 II i Packet Pg. 1353 9.A.5.g CHARWAY, GEORGE CHASTAIN, RODNEY G 2141 FAIRMONT LN 3240 33RD AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1560 CHAVEZ, DEYSI I' i CHAVEZ, LAZARA GABRIEL CHAVEZ 1 j ELIODORO CHAVEZ 2932 29TH AVE NE i 2460 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 CHEN, WEI i CHERNIAVSKI, ELENA 2360 39TH AVE NE 6052 NICHOLAS DR NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I WEST BLOOMFIELD, MI 48322---0 I CHICO,JIMMEY CHO, EDWIN 2070 MINNEOLA ST I 741 W 17TH ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 HIALEAH, FL 33010--- 2416 CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF I CIFMORE, LEE LATTER -DAY -SAINTS 2721 24TH AVE NE 50 E NORTH TEMPLE ST NAPLES, FL 34120---0 22ND FLOOR SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84150 --- 1 j CIRIGLIANO LIVING TRUST A CIRKSENA, JULIE ANN 2182 CLEMENTINE ST I JENNIFER LEIGH ARON NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 JAMES RICHARD NELSON 16330 BOSTON PKWY CLINE, IA 50325--- 4656 CLAUDIO, LAURA C 1999 FAIRMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 CLERMONT, JAMES STEPHANIE DUMEL 5350 TRAMMEL ST NAPLES, FL 34113---0 COHEN, ORLANDO DIANA FIGUEROA VEGA DAVID SALOMON COHEN 3645 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 COLINDRES, EDGAR AUGUSTO MARIA GRACE LYNCH GARMENDEZ 5721 A CENTER LN #f203 FALLS CHURCH, VA 22042 --- 0 CLEMENT, JOHN S SHEELU ALEX 2048 HAMLIN ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 CLINE, AARON & STACEY 2446 HEYDON CIR E NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 COHEN, PATRICIA A JAMES C COHEN 2650 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3695 COLLIER CNTY 3335 TAMIAMI TRAIL E STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 CHAVARRIA, LUIS 1 & MAGALY T 2549 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120--- 5577 CHEN - QIAN TRUST 3841 W 144TH ST LEAWOOD, KS 66224 --- 0 CHERUBIN, BEAUCHAMP ALTAGRACE CHERUBIN 3875 EVERGLADES BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS 50 EAST NORTH TEMPLE 22ND FLR SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101 --- 0 CIOFFI, SALVATORE & LUSIA 1664 65TH ST BROOKLYN, NY 11204 --- 0 CLARK, COURTNEY F LISSETTE GARCIA 3275 RANDALL BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 CLEMMONS, JAKE & STACY 1987 PARSON ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 CLIS HOLDING GROUP LLC ANGELCABRERA 4870 GOLDEN GATE PKWY NAPLES, FL 34116 --- 0 COLDIRON, CHRISTOPHER W MONICA COLDIRON 2206 CLEMENTINE ST NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY 3335 TAMIAMI TRAIL E STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 Packet Pg. 1354 9.A.5.g COLLIER CNTY 3335 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 i .I COLLIER CNTY 3335 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 f �I I COLLIER CNTY f 3335 TAMIAMI TRL E NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY 3335 TAMIAMIATRL E STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 1 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 l� COLLIER CNTY j C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 i COLLIER CNTY 3335 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY 3335 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY 3335 TAMIAMI TRL E STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY C/0 REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY 3335 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY 3335 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY 3335 TAMIAMI TRL E STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 Packet Pg. 1355 9.A.5.g COLLIER CNTY COLLIER CNTY COLLIER CNTY C/0 REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 I 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 I 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY COLLIER CNTY COLLIER CNTY C/0 REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT ' C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT I I C/0 REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 I I 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 i NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 I I I NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY COLLIER CNTY COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT i C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT I 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 i I NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 i COLLIER CNTY COLLIER CNTY COLLIER CNTY j C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 I 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 I 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34112 - 0 COLLIER CNTY COLLIER CNTY COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 I 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 I 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY (y COLLIER CNTY COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT l C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 COLLIER CNTY } COLLIER CNTY COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT I I C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 i NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34112---0 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 I COLLIER CNTY COLLIER CNTY l COLLIER CNTY I ( C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT I 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 a335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 COLLIER CNTY I I ! COLLIER CNTY , COLLIER CNTY COLLIER CNTY WATER/SEWER DIST TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY I TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY 3301 TAMIAMI TRL E I 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S NAPLES, FL 34112--- 4961 I ! NAPLES, FL 34104 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34104 --- 0 i COLLIER CNTY ( COLLIER CNTY COLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY i TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY i i TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVES 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S 1 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S NAPLES, FL 34104 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34104 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34104 - 0 Packet Pg. 1356 9.A.5.g COLLIER CNTY COLLIER CNTY COLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S ; 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S NAPLES, FL 34104---0 NAPLES, FL 34104 --- 0 i I NAPLES, FL 34104 --- 0 I I COLLIER CNTY COLLIER COUNTY COLLIER COUNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY I 3335 TAMIAMI TRAIL E I C/O OFFICE OF COUNTY ATTORNEY 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S ; NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 i j 3299 TAMIAMI TRAIL E #800 I NAPLES, FL 34104 --- 0 ! I I NAPLES, FL 34112---0 COLLIER COUNTY COLLIER SOIL AND WATER ( COLLIER SOIL AND WATER C/O OFFICE OF COUNTY ATTORNEY CONSERVATION DISTRICT CONSERVATION DISTRICT 3299 TAMIAMI TRAIL E #800 I 14700 IMMOKALEE RD I i 14700 IMMOKALEE RD NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1468 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1468 COLLINS EST, DOROTHY M COLLINS, HOMER M I COLOME, ENELIDO A C/O P L COLLINS JENSEN PR % DAVE COLLINS INGRID COLOME 1322 JOHNS BLVD 12749 S HAGAN CT 1875 SW 22ND TER RAYMORE, MO 64083 --- 0 OLATHE, KS 66062 --- 0 MIAMI, FL 33145--- 3821 COMERIATO, ROBERTJ & OLIVIA M CONGINEJR, VITO J &TRUDY L CONGINE 1R, VITO J &TRUDY L 1971 FAIRMONT LN 2894 31ST AVE NE I I 2894 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120---4476 NAPLES, FL 34120---4476 CONIGLIARO, GIOVANNI l '" CONNERS, MICHAEL MATTHEW i _ CONTRERAS, SERGIO 14629 BEAUFORT CIR KATHLEEN ANNE CONNERS JEANETTA G CONTRERAS j NAPLES, FL 34119--- 4829 2110 HAMLIN ST 2833 37TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7433 I COPPLA JR, HAROLD T & PAT CORADO, BYRON RICARDO MUNOZ , CORDOVES, ERIC 20S4 MANDARIN LN MAYTE CRYSTAL MUNOZ ELIZA HERNANDEZ NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4554 2475 41ST AVE NE 2008 SAGEBRUSH CIR NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I CORNEJO, JOHANNA CAROLINA CORONA, JOSE R CORRALES, WILSON FREDY JESUS E ZAPATA 2715 41ST AVE NE ; GLORIA IRENE CORRALES 2882 41ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---2801 j 2274 HEYDON CIR W NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 CORREA, YENNY V ,' CORTEZ, HUGO ANTONIO I COSIMANO, JOSEPH & LAUREN I MIGUEL MONIES DELGADO I GLADYS LETTY VERANO 3662 29TH AVE NE I 2680 37TH AVE NE I 2177 CLEMENTINE ST i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120---0 I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I COSTA, JACINTO & ELISA COUNTRY HOME LLC COVENTRY, JAMES E 1991 FAIRMONT LN PO BOX 2407 i CHRISTINE L COVENTRY NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MARCO ISLAND, FL 3414S---0 1967 FAIRMONT LN ! NAPLES, FL 34120---0 li j Packet Pg. 1357 9.A.5.g COX II, THOMAS CHARLES CRAIG, JANIQUE CRATO, JOSEPH S AMY JO COX 5259 HIGH COURT I 2013 FAIRMONT LN 2152 FAIRMONT LN PLUMSTEADVILLE, PA 18947 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4575 I j i i CRESPO, YADIEL SUAREZ i I CRISCIONE, JOHN & LINDA I _ CROUSHORE, TERRY & DIONAIKA 247127TH AVE NE 2034 MANDARIN LN 3230 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 j j (I I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4554 I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 CROUSHORE, TERRY A CROUSHORE, TERRY A i CROWLEY, MICHAEL & DANIELLE DIONAIKA CROUSHORE DIONAIKA M CROUSHORE I I 2391 35TH AVE NE 3230 27TH AVE NE 3230 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1564 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 CRUTCHFIELD, JEANNIE MARIE CRUZ, ALFREDO MARTINEZ CRUZ, DANIEL MICHAEL DEWAYNE CRUTCHFIELD CRISTHEL DE LA FUENTE RIVERA JAQUELINE I HERNANDEZ ROBLERO 2604 41ST AVE NE 2885 41ST AVE NE 3625 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 CRUZ, HECTOR I & IDALMIS CRUZ, JUAN CRUZ, LUISJ 2565 35TH AVE NE 560 E 58TH ST MARIA PEREIRA NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1404 HIALEAH, FL 33013--- 1315 JUNNIO FREIXA 6090 W 15TH CT HIALEAH, FL 33012--- 6202 CRUZ, SAUL r CUBAS, LUIS GUILLERMO CUEVAS, JACOB & LAURA ALICIA MARLENE PONCE YOLANDA CORTIJO CUBAS i 1989 SAGEBRUSH CIR 2049 MANDARIN LN 17011 N BAY RD APT 801 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4567 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4555 SUNNY ISLES BEAC, FL 33160--- 3133 CUEVAS, LILLIAN CULROSS, NATHAN CUMANA, DANIEL & MARTA 2740 31ST AVE NE KRISTEN KERVIN 9079 NW 121ST ST NAPLES, FL 34120---4542 2044 HAMLIN ST HIALEAH GARDENS, FL 33018--- 4172 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 CUMBERLAND PROPERTIES 1 LLC CUNNINGHAM, BEVERLEY CURBELO, JORGE L FLORES I 4532 TAMIAMI TRAIL E #f202 CARENE N CUNNINGHAM I ANISLEIDY GUERRA VALDES NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 DONNA GINTER 2980 35TH AVE NE 2760 315T AVE NE I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120---4542 CUSTODIO, CHRISTIANNE KATE CZYSZ FAMILY TRUST I D GREENFIELD TRUST LEA CUSTODIO I 2050 MANDARIN LN I 3460 27TH AVE NE 2083 SAGEBRUSH CIR NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 4554 I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1509 NAPLES, FL 34120---4569 I I 1 DABANK, ROB DALBY FAMILY TRUST I DALBY FAMILY TRUST 2225 CARA CARA WAY 9319 FIELDSTONE LN 9319 FIELDSTONE LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 !I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 1 ! NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 Packet Pg. 1358 9.A.5.g DALUSMA, DIEUJUSTE DANIEL, DONALD LEE DARCHE JR, PHILIP LEE JONITE AVRIL JEAN MCGIBONEY DANIEL JEAN ANN DARCHE 2145 FAIRMONT LN 2153 CLEMENTINE ST 2211 VERMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4576 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i NAPLES, FL 34120 0 DARWIN, MATTHEW JOHN & SUSAN DASCHKE, AMY & MICHAEL DENNIS I DAVID & SHERYLANDERSON TRUST 2113 SATSUMA LN I ! 2035 SAGEBRUSH CIR I 253 GALWAY DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4569 I CARY, IL 60013 0 DAVIDSON, DONALD i DAVILA, LUIS I DAVIS, KENNETH R &JOYLETTY 2199 VERMONT LN 3325 29TH AVE NE I I KENYAY DAVIS NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 Ij 116016TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3409 I DAYTON, LYNN E Il DE LAUFER ET AL, MARIA E F I DE MOMBLACK, KELY DURAN 2525 35TH AVE NE I 9250 BELLEZA WAY #102 I 5337 BRIN WAY NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1404 i FORT MYERS, FL 33908 --- 0 AVE MARIA, FL 34142-- 0 DE RENDON, PATRICIA G PRIMO DE SILVA, DIONNIE PARCHMENT } ( DE SOUSA, QUINTINO 3027 RANDALL BLVD 20011 SW 83RD AVE I 812 96TH AVE N NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 CUTLER BAY, FL 33189--- 2010 I NAPLES, FL 34108 --- 0 I l DE SOUSA, QUINTINO C DE ZAYAS, FIDEL GOMEZ DEARTH, DIANA E 2605 27TH AVE NE D CAROLINA SOLANO ESCOBAR 2081 FAIRMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1484 2690 OIL WELL RD NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 �I DEJESUS, SATURNINO DEL SOL, JORGE LUIS DEL VALLE, MARCOS U BRETTE N DEJESUS I GRANEY MOREJON PINO 2672 31ST AVE N E BRANDON N DEJESUS 3319 31ST AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120- 0 1952 WELLINGTON STREET I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I t DEL VALLE, NANCY i i DELANEY JR, RICHARD L DELEON, DOUGLAS VICTOR M AVILES EVELYN J DELANEY ) I 3740 31ST AVE NE j 3485 27TH AVE NE 2078 SATSUMA LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 417 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I DELGADO, BELINDA DELGADO, ILEANA D DELGADO, ROXANA i 3610 27TH AVE NE I I 3865 EVERGLADES BLVD N I ` 2990 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1531 I I NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1582 I I DELGADO, TERESA li I � DELINOIS, TED I� DELLAPORTA, MARGARET A 2685 35TH AVE NE I 2117 FAIRMONT LN i I I 2111 VERMONT LN I NAPLES, FL 34120---1406 I NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 i i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 Packet Pg. 1359 9.A.5.g t DEMETRIOU, JOHN S DEMOREST, JAMES I DEMORETT, PHILLIP C & LAURIE A 8593 WEBSTER HILLS ROAD ANDREA FIRTH 2060 SAGE BRUSH CIRCLE DEXTER, MI 48130 --- 0 2067 VERMONT LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 DENIS CARPENTRY LLC DENNIS J SHANKS REV TRUST DEPALMA, LAUREN M a 4274 6TH AVE S E i MARY JO SHANKS REV TRUST ` JOSEPH MIANULLI NAPLES, FL 34117---0 I 42WO30 HUGHES RD I 14 MIDWOOD AVE Ll i ELBURN, IL 60119 --- 0 ` FARMINGDALE, NY 11735---0 DEPIANO, NICOLA & ELENA DESHANO, ALAN & ELIZABETH A 1 I DESIR, MARIE 2030 MANDARIN LN I 21.62 CLEMENTINE ST I 3260 37TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 f II NAPLES, FL 34120---0 DEVISSE, VIRGINIA DEVISSE, VIRGINIA tl` DEVISSE, VIRGINIA i 10701 GULF SHORE DR #201 10701 GULF SHORE DR #201 I 2472 27TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34108 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34108 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120-- 0 DEVRIES, TIMOTHY G & HELEN J DIAZ, ALEXANDER GOYES ' DIAZ, LUCY i I ` 3591 EVERGLADES BLVD N I DEISY RODRIGUEZ JESUS ESTRADA c NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 2972 37TH AVE NE 3929 SW 60TH AVE c NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MIAMI, FL 33155--- 5016 C c c c DIAZ, MARCO LOPEZ DIAZ, MAVIS Y _ DIAZ, MILAGROS DE LA CARIDAD c c ALIET GAMEZ DIAZ 2885 RANDALL BLVD 2420 RANDALL BLVD ( 2545 35TH AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120---0 ` c Il DIAZ, XIOMARA SOCARRAS DIAZ-BARCELO, MARIA DEL C DICARLO, ANTHONY & GRACE 2846 EVERGGLADES BLVD N ( AMERICO SOLER 47 SAYBROOK STREET NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I 2064 HAMLIN STREET STATEN ISLAND, NY 10314 --- 0 i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 f DIEPPA, REINALDO & CARIDAD DIETZ, PAUL ( DIMEGLIO, ANTHONY & ROSALIA 640 E 10TH AVE 27730 WOODMONT ST I 2157 CLEMENTINE ST HIALEAH, FL 33010--- 4642 ROSEVILLE, MI 48066---2728 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I I I � DINELLO, ROSE ANN DINNEEN, SILVIA l DIRIENZO, LEONARDO & MICHELLE i 2254 HEYDON CIR W MARCOS SANTOS REYES I 1949 ANDERSON LN NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 2383 BEAR CREEK DR #204 NAPLES, FL 34120---0 y I NAPLES, FL 34109---0 I a � I DJURIC, IAN DAVID PETAR DOAN, JONATHAN ALLEN i DOEHRING, JAMES R & JUDY A GRANDEE LYNN DJURIC I CODY GRAVES DOAN I 7136 CURTIS DR 2262 VERMONT LN 2238 VERMONT LN DARDENNE PRAIRIE, MO 63368--- 9600 NAPLES, FL 34120---0 i NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 I i Packet Pg. 1360