Loading...
CCWWA Minutes 09/18/2023September 18, 2023 1 MINUTES OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER AND WASTEWATER AUTHORITY MEETING Naples, Florida, September 18, 2023 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, the Collier County Water and Wastewater Authority in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 2:00 P.M. in REGULAR SESSION at the Collier County Growth Management Department Building, Conference Room 609/610, 2800 Horseshoe Drive N., Naples, Florida, with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: Eloy Ricardo VICE-CHAIR: Patricia Sherry Bryant Collins Eugene Wordehoff (excused) ALSO PRESENT: Jamie French, Department Head, GMCD Michael Stark, Director, Ops & Regulatory Management Derek Perry, Assistant County Attorney Julie Chardon, Ops Support Specialist II, GMCD Evelyn Trimino, Manager, Financial Operations, Operations Support & Regulatory Management Division Monica Leon, Budget Analyst II, GMCD September 18, 2023 2 Any persons in need of the verbatim record of the meeting may request a copy of the audio recording from the Collier County Growth Management Department. I. Call to Order (Determination of Quorum) and Roll Call Chairman Ricardo called the meeting to order at 2 p.m. Roll call was taken and a quorum of three was established. Attorney F. Marshall “Marty” Deterding, of Sundstrum & Mindlin LLP, representing Ave Maria Utility Co., introduced himself. II. Approval of Agenda – Meeting of September 18, 2023 No changes Vice Chair Sherry moved to approve the ag enda. Second by Mr. Collins. The motion passed unanimously, 3-0. III. Approval of Minutes – Meeting of May 8, 2023 Vice Chair Sherry moved to approve the May 8, 2023, meeting minutes. Second by Mr. Collins. The motion passed unanimously, 3-0. IV. Items Requiring Action by the Authority A. Ave Maria Utility Company Territory Expansion Mr. Stark said we’re here to consider approving the Ave Maria Utility Company territory expansion, which is on page 6 of the agenda packet. Marty, who represents Ave Maria, will provide a brief overview. Attorney Deterling told the CCWWA: x In December 2022, on behalf of Ave Maria Utility, we filed a request for expansion of service territory on a 1,000-acre parcel due east of the existing territory. x It’s an area Ave Maria is looking to develop in the future. x It’s contiguous with the existing territory and next to the existing facilities, so we’re in the best position to provide service. We want to move forward to expand our service territories to include that area. x We filed the required notice in accordance with their rules. Anyone who is substantially affected and has any objection must file an objection within 30 days. x That period passed in January, so we have everything required by the rules. Mr. Collins said the water and wastewater treatment says it’s 2 million gallons per day. Is that the current capacity or the potential capacity? David Jansen, of the Ave Maria Utility Co., said the plant’s current capacity is 1 million gallons per day. We’re permitting and will start construction on the second phase, which will increase capacity to 2 million GPD. Ultimately, at buildout, including this additional housing we’re adding to the franchise territory, we expect the capacity will be around 500,000 GPD to handle the expansion, as needed. September 18, 2023 3 Vice Chair Sherry asked if the expansion will all take place on the roads. You won’t have easements going for property or rights of way? Attorney Deterling said it’s all in the 1,000-acre parcel and will cross from where it ends now and go into the new area. We will build large lines across that end and the treatment facilities will stay where they currently fit and will be expanded there. Mr. French told the CCWWA: x He’s the former executive director of the Collier County Water & Wastewater Authority. x This was a strategic move by us. This application came in. He, Marty and Ken Kovensky discussed it, but we waited until the Board of County Commissioners agreed to expand this area. x This area is an exclusive franchise, meaning exclusivity is granted to the utility service provider. x The property is owned by the same developer. This was unique because of that level of exclusivity. x It prevents the county or other utility service providers from being able to run lines through their service territory. x We learned our lesson years ago, when Orange Tree Utility existed. We have language that will allow for transmission lines, not service lines, in the event the county wanted to run a line as they do their regional water plants. There may not ever be a line there, but if they elected to do that through the Board of County Commissioners, this has been granted. x It’s a little tardy on our part, but it was done by design because we wanted to make sure they got through the entitlement process first so they could develop the site. x We know they need utilities and we also know that the North Regional Water Plant would not meet their timeline within a reasonable amount of time, so we negotiated this with the Public Utilities Department. He and Dr. George Yilmaz spoke about this, and there was no objection. There is no letter of objection. Mr. Collins moved to adopt Final Order No. 2023-02 for proposed additions of utility service into any additional service area and authority to amend franchise certificates authorizing such actions. Second by Vice Chair Sherry. The motion passed unanimously, 3-0. B. Ave Maria Utility Company – Index and Pass-through Increase i. Water and Wastewater Rate Increases. Mr. Stark said Ave Maria Utility Co. is applying for a 4.86% increase to its water service and a 4.67% for wastewater service. In May, when we met, the price index factor of 7.07% was adopted for final order No. 2023-01. We have representatives here, if there are any questions. Mr. Collins said Appendix A lists the report justifying the cost increases. Page 101’s exhibit is a special report that satisfies the requirement authority rules, but there’s no Exhibit A here. It goes to Exhibit E. September 18, 2023 4 Mr. Stark said this is a cover letter on summary. Page 115 shows Exhibit A, the cover letter and summary of conclusions by Jacobs. Mr. Collins said he’s confused about Exhibit A. Jacobs seems to be referring more to the report they did on the assessment, the condition and depreciation. Attorney Deterling said the agenda package contains Exhibit A to the index adjustment is the group of schedules that calculate the index-rate adjustment. It’s a group of four schedules that show the calculations of the percentage-increase rates. A discussion ensued over the rate increase, impacts and the anticipated increase in annual revenue. Vice Chair Sherry moved to adopt Final Order No. 2023-03, adjusting the wastewater rates of Ave Maria Utility Company LLLP by applying the 2023 Price Index Factor to the allowable 2023 operation and maintenance expenses, and its amortized pass- through costs for water and wastewater. Second by Chairman Ricardo. The motion passed unanimously, 3-0. C. Ave Maria Utility Company- Rate of Depreciation Filing Mr. Stark said this is on page 109. On August 4, 2023, the Ave Maria Utility Company applied for a change in revenue rates and petitioned for a change in the average service life of depreciation rates and the reinstatement of accumulated depreciation on such assets. Exhibit A, in accordance with Collier County Water & Wastewater Authority Rules and Procedures Sections 2.14, Sections 5-6 and 9 of Resolution 1996-13, as amended. A discussion ensued and the following points were made: x The Jacobs report did a condition assessment report, but the replacement schedule is empty. x Is the utility planning to match the O&M, such as the replacement of equipment, in line with the depreciation schedule? If it had a 15-year life, but wasn’t going to be used because you’re under capacity, are you valuing it with a 30-year life? x That’s partly why Ave Maria asked for this. Ave Maria believes it lines up with what we’re estimating the service lines will be. They will be there much longer due to a combination of factors, including reduced usage and the type of things that were installed, quality of material and maintenance that has been undertaken. x It’s one of many rewards for the quality of their operations. Jacobs determined that the combination of those resulted in a need to change the lives of everybody from a regulatory standpoint and from the standpoint of the authority, we’re trying to match cost to customers receiving the value of those costs. x The definition of depreciation, as stated in your rule, aligns with what we’re proposing to do here to make sure that the life of the asset and its diminished life over that period of time matches up with what you put in as depreciation expense and what you show as accumulated depreciation. x Ave Maria found that what we did in the past was not correct and based upon these factors, we’re asking to make it make it better fit the circumstance. September 18, 2023 5 x The length of the product is longer than the anticipated length, so it tends to keep rates lower. Attorney Perry said he represents the authority in a legal capacity. His duty is to ensure you understand. The CCWWA established a general set of depreciation rates in 1996, and since then there haven’t been changes, Ave Maria is asking for a deviation from its own general standard from 1996. Mr. French said this is recognized by the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners. This is a cost-effective way to better balance the tariff against good sound, economic and engineering principles based on the life of service. It’s not uncommon throughout the country. This is like the Florida Public Service Commission. It’s a common standard. Attorney Perry said it’s unique and seemed very reasonable. In 30 years’ time, machines have gotten better. Mr. French said our code could use a little updating, but this is our only remaining regulated utility company [he later said there are two remaining]. We once had six. Attorney Deterling said there was a roughly 8% error in some of the calculations of the impact of the proposed change. We can provide staff with revised figures and schedules. The impact was 8-9% higher than what we had shown in our schedules. Brian Stockman, tax compliance manager for Ave Maria Utilities, told the CCWWA: x It shows the complexities of group depreciation. He was using only our depreciation system, which stops calculating depreciation and cost, whereas group depreciation continues to depreciate assets in excess of the cost incurred to install that asset. x As a result, the difference is about $618,000, so we have an additional $618,000 worth of accumulated depreciation taken on our financial statements and we would be restating it. x Our restatement is based on the corrected useful lines of those assets and based on our data report. It means our restatement is about $618,000 higher than the number we requested in our statement. x That came to him today as he was preparing for this meeting Vice Chair Sherry asked if they had a revised schedule. We need something to vote on. How can we vote if it’s going to change? Attorney Deterling said he didn’t have the entire filing. If you need those schedules immediately, we could get them. We’d rather do that than delay action. Mr. Stockman said he can indicate the bottom numbers but doesn’t have numbers for each group. That would exclude a lot of items. We have thousands of assets on our schedule. Jabobs only looked at a couple hundred. A discussion ensued over whether to reschedule the meeting for a vote and Mr. Stockman said he could return to his office and bring back the information in about 15 minutes. September 18, 2023 6 [A recess was taken from 2:30-3:02 p.m.] Vice Chair Sherry made a motion to adopt Final Order No. 2023-04 for a proposed change in service life depreciation rates, restatement of accumulated depreciation rates and restatement of accumulated depreciation on such assets for Ave Maria Utility Company LLLP. Second by Chairman Ricardo. The motion passed unanimously, 3-0. V. Staff Discussion Mr. Stark said we have one CCWWA opening and have reached out to our Water Wastewater Collier County contacts, the division directors, and to the public to ensure they’re aware of the opening. Also, Eugene Wardahoff didn’t attend today so we need to discuss that. The process is that we let you know what the reason was for not attending and you can mark it as excused or not. He did not feel that he had enough time to properly prepare for today’s meeting and wanted to be excused. Chairman Ricardo said we’ll mark it as an excused absence. VI. Open to Public (No public comment) VII. Authority Members Discussion Mr. Collins said that on the county’s website it says the CCWWA meets on the third Monday of each month. You probably should change that because people will show up and see that no one is here. Mr. French said we’ll address that and told the CCWWA: x He was wrong. There are two regulated utilities in Collier County. x The reason we regulate this at a local level is because in 1996, the Board of County Commissioners had just regained that utility. x It was turned over to the state in 1986 and there were complaints coming in from the utility or private utility customers. They had to drive all the way to Tallahassee to be heard by the Florida Public Service Commission. x Under Chapter 367, this authority cannot be granted to anyone at the municipal level. It can only be given to the county, and if the county were to get this back, it has to be for no less than 10 years. It has to be awarded by the Florida Public Service Commission. x Those meetings are typically held in Tallahassee. Although we only have two utilities, it’s very important that in the event of a billing perplexity, service commitments not being met, or questions from consumers or private utilities, whether it’s north Marco or Ave Maria, we need to have something locally. x We have another board, the Construction Board of Appeals, which is recognized by the Florida Building Commission. If you want to appeal the decision of the building official or fire official, there’s a right of appeal before it goes to the Florida Building Commission for a final determination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