The URL can be used to link to this page

Agenda 01/23/2024 Item # 9B (Ordinance - Mattson at Vanderbilt PL20220001010)Proposed Agenda Changes Board of County Commissioners Meeting January 23, 2024 Correct placement of move Item 16B2 to Item 17C: Recommendation that the Board approve a proposed Ordinance Modification to Collier County Ordinance No. 2006-56, the Rock Road Improvement Municipal Service Taxing Unit (MSTU), to reestablish an advisory committee to provide input to the County on matters related to the MSTU. (Staffs Request) Move Item 16a7 to Item 11C: Recommendation to waive the nighttime hearing requirement and hear a Land Development Code amendment regarding food trucks and food truck parks at two regularly scheduled daytime Board of County Commissioner meetings and approve a request to advertise the Land Development Code Amendment. (Commissioner Saunders' Request) Add -on Item 10B to be heard immediately following 4A: Presentation from the Productivity Committee regarding Outsourcing vs Insourcing of Transportation Engineering Construction Engineering Inspection Services (CEI) (Commissioner Saunders' Request) Add -on Item IOC: Recommendation to approve acceptance of 80 to 100 donated air purifiers from Carrier Air and direct staff to implement a program for distribution to Collier County non-profit organizations, by application, with priority given to healthcare facilities and organizations that offer short-term or long-term residential services. (Commissioner Saunders' Request) Continue Items 9A & 913 to the February 27, 2024 BCC Meeting: Mattson at Vanderbilt GMPA (PL20220001010) and PUDZ (PL20220001011) (Applicant's Request) Notes: Staff Communication item: Update related to the recent Boil Water notice in North Collier and community communication. (Commissioner Saunders' Request) TIME CERTAIN ITEMS: Item 10B to be heard immediately following 4A: Productivity Committee Presentation. Item l0A to be heard at SPM: Moratorium ordinance on privately -initiated Growth Management Plan amendment applications. 1/23/2024 11:42 AM 9.B 01/23/2024 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation to approve an Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners amending the Collier County Growth Management Plan to create the Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict to allow a maximum density of 150 multifamily rental units with affordable housing. The subject property is located on the north side of Vanderbilt Beach Road, approximately 825 feet from the intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Livingston Road, in Section 31, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 5.88f acres. [PL20220001010] (This is a companion to item 9A) OBJECTIVE: To have the Board of County Commissioners (Board) approve (adopt) the proposed small-scale amendment to the Growth Management Plan (GMP) and approve said amendment for transmittal to the Florida Department of Commerce. CONSIDERATIONS: The petition seeks to amend the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan by creating the Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict to allow for a maximum density of 25.5 dwelling units per acre. Of the proposed 150 multi -family rental dwelling units, the petitioner has committed to provide 30 percent of the dwelling units as rent and income -restricted: half of those income -restricted units for households whose incomes are less than 80% of the Area Median Income (AMI), and half of those income -restricted unit for households whose incomes are less than 100% of the AMI. The companion petition (PL20220001011) proposes to rezone the site from Rural Agricultural (A) to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD). The subject 5.88-acre site is located on the north side of Vanderbilt Beach Road, approximately 825 feet east of Livingston Road in Section 31, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. The site is comprised of two parcels, both designated as Urban (Mixed Use District, Residential Subdistrict). Per Chapter 163.3187, Part II, Florida Statutes, limitations are in place for this type of small-scale amendment, as identified below, followed by staff comments [italicized in brackets]. Process for adoption of small-scale comprehensive plan amendment. (1) A small-scale development amendment may be adopted under the following conditions: a) The proposed amendment involves a use of 50 acres or fewer. [The amendment pertains to a property consisting of f5.88 acres.] b) The proposed amendment does not involve a text change to the goals, policies, and objectives of the local government's comprehensive plan but only proposes a land use change to the future land use map for a site - specific small-scale development activity. However, text changes that relate directly to and are adopted simultaneously with the small-scale future land use map amendment shall be permissible under this section. [This amendment involves a site -specific text and map location.] c) The property subject to the proposed amendment is not located within an area of critical state concern unless the project subject to the proposed amendment involves the construction of affordable housing units meeting the criteria of s. 420.0004 (3) and is located within an area of critical state concern designated by s. 380.0552 or by the Administration Commission pursuant to s. 380.05 (1). [The subject property is not within an Area of Critical State Concern.] d) Comprehensive plans may only be amended in such a way as to preserve the internal consistency of the plan pursuant to s. 163.3177. [The amendment preserves the internal consistency between and among GMP elements] FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: Staff makes the following findings and conclusions based on a review of this petition, including the supporting data and analysis. More analysis is provided in the Staff Report to the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC). • The Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict petition proposes a small-scale Growth Management Plan amendment to create a new subdistrict in the Urban Designation, Mixed Use District, to allow for a Packet Pg. 62 O1/23/2024 residential density of 25.5 dwelling units per acre for multi -family rental units. The developer has committed to 30 percent of the units as income -restricted. • Transportation Planning Staff recommends approval of the proposed GMPA as submitted. • There are no adverse environmental impacts as a result of this petition. • No historical or archaeological sites are affected by this amendment. • There are no concerns about impacts on other public infrastructure. • There is a demonstrated need for the proposed use. • The site's use will create minimal impact on the surrounding area. FISCAL IMPACT: Petition fees account for staff review time and materials and the cost of associated legal advertising/public notice for the public hearings. Therefore, no fiscal impacts to Collier County result from adopting this amendment. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Adopting the proposed amendment by the Board and its transmittal to the Florida Department of Commerce will commence the Department's (30) thirty -day challenge period for any affected person. Provided the small-scale amendment is not challenged, it becomes effective (31) thirty-one days after Board adoption. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This Growth Management Plan (GMP) amendment is authorized and subject to the procedures established in Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes, The Community Planning Act, and Collier County Resolution No. 12-234, as amended. The Board should consider the following criteria in making its decision: "Plan amendments shall be based on relevant and appropriate data and an analysis by the local government that may include but not be limited to, surveys, studies, community goals and vision, and other data available at the time of adoption of the plan amendment. To be based on data means to react to it in an appropriate way and to the extent necessary indicated by the data available on that particular subject at the time of adoption of the plan or plan amendment at issue." 163.3177(1)(f), F.S. In addition, s. 163.3177(6)(a)2, F.S. provides that FLUE plan amendments shall be based on surveys, studies, and data regarding the area, as applicable, including: a. The amount of land required to accommodate anticipated growth. b. The projected permanent and seasonal population of the area. c. The character of undeveloped land. d. The availability of water supplies, public facilities, and services. e. The need for redevelopment, including the renewal of blighted areas and the elimination of f. non -conforming uses inconsistent with the community's character. g. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to or closely proximate to military installations. h. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to an airport as defined in s. 330.35 and consistent with s. 333.02. i. The need to modify land uses and development patterns with antiquated subdivisions. j. The discouragement of urban sprawl. k. The need for job creation, capital investment, and economic development that will strengthen and diversify the community's economy. And FLUE map amendments shall also be based upon the following analysis per Section 63.3177(6)(a)8.: a. An analysis of the availability of facilities and services. b. An analysis of the suitability of the plan amendment for its proposed use considering the character of the undeveloped land, soils, topography, natural resources, and historic resources on site. c. An analysis of the minimum amount of land needed to achieve the goals and requirements of this section. This item is approved as to form and legality. It requires an affirmative vote of four for approval because this is an Adoption hearing of the GMP amendment. (HFAC) Packet Pg. 63 01/23/2024 9.B STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION: Staff did not support the density of 25.5 dwelling units per acre with the provision of 22.6 percent affordable housing, as originally proposed. Also, staff did not support the reduction of the useable open space as a GMP provision and instead recommended a deviation from the LDC. The applicant subsequently agreed to increase the income - restricted units to 30 percent and to request a deviation through the PUD rezone to reduce the open space; therefore, the staff recommendation at the December 7, 2023, public hearing was for the CCPC to forward Petition PL20220001010, Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict GMPA, to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation to approve and adopt and transmit to the Florida Department of Commerce and other statutorily required agencies. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The CCPC heard this petition at their December 7, 2023, meeting. The CCPC voted 6-0 to forward the subject petition to the Board with a recommendation to approve for transmittal to the Florida Department of Commerce (DOC) and other statutorily required agencies. No letters of objection have been received; therefore, the petition has been placed on the Summary Agenda. RECOMMENDATION: To adopt and transmit petition PL2022000 10 10 to the Florida Department of Commerce and other statutorily required agencies. Prepared by: Kathy Eastley, Planner III, Zoning Division ATTACHMENT(S) 1. Mattson at Vanderbilt GMPA Staff Report (PDF) 2. Attachment A - Revised Ordinance 12-12-23 (PDF) 3. [Linked] Attachment B - Backup Materials (PDF) 4. Attachment C - Hearing Advertising Sign (PDF) 5. legal ad - agenda IDs 27402 & 27469 (PDF) Packet Pg. 64 9.6 01/23/2024 COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners Item Number: 9.B Doc ID: 27469 Item Summary: Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending the Collier County Growth Management Plan to change the designation of property from Urban Designation, Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict to Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict, to allow a maximum density of 150 multifamily rental units with affordable housing. The subject property is located on the north side of Vanderbilt Beach Road, approximately 825 feet from the intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Livingston Road, in Section 31, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 5.88± acres. [PL20220001010] (This is a companion to item 9A) Meeting Date: 01/23/2024 Prepared by: Title: — Zoning Name: Katherine Eastley 12/15/2023 12:57 PM Submitted by: Title: Zoning Director — Zoning Name: Mike Bost 12/15/2023 12:57 PM Approved By: Review: Zoning Mike Bosi Division Director Zoning Mike Bosi Additional Reviewer Development Review Cormac Giblin Additional Reviewer Unknown Jaime Cook Additional Reviewer Growth Management Community Development Department Diane Lynch Growth Management Community Development Department James C French County Attorney's Office Office of Management and Budget County Attorney's Office Office of Management and Budget County Manager's Office Board of County Commissioners Heidi Ashton-Cicko Level 2 Attorney of Record Review Debra Windsor Level 3 OMB Gatekeeper Review Jeffrey A. Klatzkow Level 3 County Attorney's Office Review Laura Zautcke Additional Reviewer Amy Patterson Level 4 County Manager Review Geoffrey Willig Meeting Pending Completed 12/15/2023 1:08 PM Skipped 12/15/2023 1:13 PM Completed 01/02/2024 10:44 AM Completed 01/04/2024 4:05 PM Department review Completed 01/08/2024 11:10 AM Growth Management Completed 01/09/2024 2:07 PM Completed 01/11/2024 3:11 PM Completed 01/11/2024 3:18 PM Completed 01/12/2024 9:32 AM Completed 01/12/2024 12:27 PM Completed 01/17/2024 1:46 PM 01/23/2024 9:00 AM Packet Pg. 65 9.B.a PL20230001010 Coi[�ie,- CoKvi.ty STAFF REPORT COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT, ZONING DIVISION, COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING SECTION HEARING DATE: DECEMBER 7, 2023 SUBJECT: PL20220001010 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT (GMPA); MATTSON AT VANDERBILT SUBDISTRICT (ADOPTION HEARING) COMPANION TO: PL20220001011 MATTSON AT VANDERBILT RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) ELEMENTS: FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT (FLUE) AGENT/APPLICANT: Agents: D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, FL 34134 Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 Naples, FL 34103 Owner/Applicant: 3333/3375 VBR, LLC 3838 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 402 Naples, FL 34103 GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The 5.881 acre property is on the north side of Vanderbilt Beach Road, approximately 825 feet east of the intersection of Livingston Road. The property has approximately 490 feet of frontage on Vanderbilt Beach Road and is within the Urban Estates Planning Community in Section 31, Township 48 South, Range 26 East. The site is comprised of two parcels: a 1.93± acre parcel that is developed with Naples Safari Animal Hospital & Pet Resort and a 3.91f acre parcel with an equestrian facility. Packet Pg. 66 Y-s- ir - ;lu i • r y SUBJI CT SITE AL * A !� r .1F_ 0. Iwoo+-. ,mi 9.B.a PL20230001010 REOUESTED ACTION: The applicant proposes a Small -Scale Comprehensive Plan amendment (a/k/a GMPA) to the Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP) Future Land Use Element (FLUE) to amend the existing designation of Urban, Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict to create a new subdistrict entitled Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict. The petition proposes to amend the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) to create a new map (Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict) in the FLUM series to identify the subdistrict. The proposed GMP Amendment is attached as Ordinance Exhibit "A." PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Proposal To create the Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict to allow a maximum of 150 multi- family rental units on the 5.88-acre property, the property (or site) is comprised of 2 parcels resulting in a density of 25.5 dwelling units per acre (DU/A). The purpose of the proposed subdistrict is to allow greater density than can be achieved through the GMP Density Rating System. The proposal includes a commitment that 22.6% of the units will be income -restricted and rent - restricted for affordable housing, with half of these units (17 units) to be income -restricted and rent -restricted for those making up to 80% of the Area Median Income (AMI) and the remaining half (17 units) to be income -restricted and rent -restricted for those making up to 100% of AMI. The affordable housing commitment is for 30 years. In addition to the increased density, the subdistrict proposes reducing the LDC-required minimum useable open space from 60% to 40%. A companion petition (PL20230001010) proposes to rezone the 2 parcels from Rural Agricultural District (A) to Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD). EXISTING CONDITIONS: Subiect Property: The 5.88-acre proposed Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict is comprised of 2 parcels: A 1.93± acre parcel is located on the western end of the subdistrict and is currently developed with a veterinarian office and kennels. This property is currently zoned Rural Agricultural (A) and has a Future Land Use Designation of Urban Residential Subdistrict. A 3.91± acre parcel is located on the eastern end of the subdistrict and contains the now -closed Bobbin Hollow Equestrian Center. This parcel is also zoned Rural Agricultural (A) and has a Future Land Use Designation of Urban Residential Subdistrict. Surrounding Lands: North: Future Land Use Designation: Urban Residential Subdistrict. Zoned: Pelican Marsh PUD. Land Use: Golf Course, then residential. East: Future Land Use Designation: Urban Residential Subdistrict. Zoned: The Vanderbilt Trust CFPUD. Land Use: Sandalwood Village Independent and Assisted Living Facility (ALF). South: (across Vanderbilt Beach Road) Future Land Use Designation: Urban Residential Subdistrict. Zoned: Vineyards PUD. Land Use: Residential uses. West: Future Land Use Designation: Urban Residential Subdistrict. Zoned: Bradford Square MPUD. Land Use: Independent and Assisted Living Facility (ALF). Packet Pg. 68 9.B.a PL20230001010 In summary, the existing land uses in the larger surrounding area consist of low -density residential use and Independent and Assisted Living Facilities, categorized as institutional use. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS: Densi The existing Future Land Use Element (FLUE), Future Land Use Map (FLUM), and Map Series of the Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP) designate the subject property as Urban, Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict. The Urban Residential Subdistrict allows a wide variety of non-residential uses, including childcare centers, churches, and public schools, which include charter schools, private schools, essential services, safety service facilities, utility and communication facilities, agricultural uses, parks, open space, and recreational uses. All these uses are allowed under the existing "A" zoning, either by conditional use or permitted by right. The Urban Residential Subdistrict provides for higher -density residential uses, with density determined by the Density Rating System; however, in no case shall the maximum density exceed 16 dwelling units per acre in the Urban Residential Subdistrict. Staff calculation of the maximum allowable (eligible) density, based upon the existing FLUE designation and applicable Density Rating System criteria, is 59 dwelling units, or 10 DU/A (see table below). 4 DU/A Base Density +3 DU/A Residential In -fill density bonus +3 DU/A TCMA-Transportation Concurrency Management Areas density bonus 10 DU/A Maximum eligible density for market -rate development only +6 DU/A Affordable HousingDensity ensity Bonus per LDC Sec. 2.06.00 16 DU/A Maximum eligible density if it includes affordable housing per LDC Note: eligible density is not an entitlement, as stated in the Density Rating System The rezoning proposal is for 150 multi -family rental units on 5.88 acres, resulting in a density of 25.5 DU/A. This is 15.5 dwelling units above the maximum density of 10 DU/A that can be achieved through the Density Rating System for market -rate development and greater than the maximum 16 DU/A maximum allowed in the Urban Residential Subdistrict. The proposed density cannot be achieved through the Density Rating System; therefore, the proposal is inconsistent with the FLUE. To achieve the proposed density of 25.5 DU/A, a GMP Amendment (GMPA) is required. Any comprehensive plan amendment to increase residential density within the Mixed Use District shall only provide for that density increase via utilization of the transfer of development right (TDR) program, except TDR credits shall not be required for projects determined by the Board of County Commissioners to have a reasonably sufficient public benefit. Staff review includes a comparative analysis of land use and density/intensity of proximate development. The proposed Mattson at Vanderbilt Subdistrict is flanked on the east and west by Independent and Assisted Living communities, which are classified as institutional uses that utilize Floor Area Ratio (FAR) to determine the intensity of use rather than density associated with residential dwelling units per acre. Surrounding residential communities include Pelican Marsh 4 Packet Pg. 69 9.B.a PL20230001010 PUD to the north (and west of the adjacent ALF), Vineyards PUD to the south across Vanderbilt Beach Road, and Wilshire Lakes PUD east of the adjacent ALF. These communities are low - density residential uses with less than four DU/A; the highest density in the vicinity is the Vineyards at 3.62 DU/A. The Bermuda Islands Apartments are located south-southwest of the project area within the Vineyards PUD and consist of 360 multi -family dwelling units on 23.26 acres for a site density of 15.48 DU/A. The overall PUD density of the Vineyards is 3.62 DU/A. The two ALF developments, Bradford Square PUD, on the west, and The Vanderbilt Trust PUD a/k/a Sandalwood Village, on the east, are part of one GMP Subdistrict, the Vanderbilt Beach Road Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict, which restricts residential density to 16 DU/A. That subdistrict also allows most uses in the C-1 through C-3 commercial zoning districts — 100,000 square feet on the westerly parcel (Bradford Square MPUD, also approved to include those commercial uses) and 80,000 square feet on the easterly parcel (The Vanderbilt Trust CFPUD, approved for group housing only — ALF, nursing home, etc.). Notwithstanding the commercial uses allowed by the subdistrict, staff believes it unlikely those two PUDs would be redeveloped with commercial uses given that both were developed within the last seven years, and each has an "improved value" in excess of $20 million. Based on the surrounding neighborhood, the proposed density is exponentially greater than the surrounding residential communities. Typical retail and commercial service uses are located approximately one mile west of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Airport Road North, but the area generally comprises low -density residential PUDs. Prior petitions for a GMPA have achieved density increases through the provision of affordable housing or other public benefit; however, at 25.5 DU/A, the proposed Mattson at Vanderbilt density is among the highest of recently approved residential projects, even those with an affordable housing component. The `standard' affordable housing provision of 22.6% of the units would result in a maximum of 34 affordable units; 50% would be provided to those earning up to 80% of Annual Median Income (AMI) and 50% up to 100 % AMI. 5 Packet Pg. 70 9.B.a PL20230001010 Adequate justification for the 25.5 DU/A cannot be found based upon 1) the low -density residential character of the surrounding community and 2) the provision of only 22.6% affordable housing units. Staff recommends a reduction in the proposed density to 16 DU/A consistent with the Vanderbilt Beach Road Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict; however, if the Planning Commission recommends the GMPA for approval, staff urges consideration of requiring additional commensurate public benefit, which may be in the form of additional affordable housing units for this subdistrict to be granted the requested increase in density to 25.5 DU/A. At a minimum, staff recommends considering requiring 30% of the proposed units to be income -restricted and rent - restricted. The additional units derived from the increased percentage should be income - restricted and rent -restricted for those making up to 100% AMI. The following chart shows the recent GMPA and PUD approvals to increase density and the required affordable housing: FLUE Subdistrict Number of Units Acres DU per acre Affordable Housing Units Vanderbilt Beach Road Residential (Ascend) 208 17.5 11.9 34% / 71 Airport Carlisle 336 27.78 12.1 22.6% / 76 Amerisite 303 18.95 16 22.6% / 69 Carman Dr 212 15.4 13.77 22.6% / 48 Immokalee Rd Interchange (Blue Coral) 234 9.35 25 30% / 70 Mattson at Vanderbilt 150 5.88 25.5 22.6% / 34 Development Standards In addition to the use and density/intensity of surrounding properties, the physical character of the adjacent communities is reviewed for uniformity and compatibility; however, development standards are administered by the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) and include setbacks and buffers, building height, and open space. Adjacent properties are developed with building heights of three to four-story structures; Sandalwood Village on the east is three stories atop one level of structured parking, with a maximum actual height of 62-feet, and Bradford Square on the west is a three-story structure with a maximum actual building height of 53-feet. Minimum buffers are provided in each of these developments and are generally consistent with those proposed for Mattson at Vanderbilt. Setbacks from Vanderbilt Beach Road are increased to 50-feet for Mattson at Vanderbilt, whereas the adjacent Bradford Square has a setback of 35-feet, and The Vanderbilt Trust PUD a/k/a Sandalwood Village setback is 25-feet. Side setbacks vary, with a high of 75-feet proposed on Mattson at Vanderbilt and decreasing to a minimum of 15-feet on the western boundary of Sandalwood Village. Open Space is a requirement of all Planned Unit Developments (PUDs), and those composed entirely of residential dwelling units require a minimum of 60% useable open space pursuant to Section 4.07.02.G.1 of the LDC. The LDC defines usable open space as: Open space, usable: Active or passive recreation areas such as parks, playgrounds, tennis courts, golf courses, beach frontage, waterways, lakes, 6 Packet Pg. 71 9.B.a PL20230001010 lagoons, floodplains, nature trails, and other similar open spaces. Usable open space areas shall also include those portions of areas set aside for preservation of native vegetation, required yards (setbacks), and landscaped areas, which are accessible to and usable by residents of an individual lot, the development, or the general public. Open water area beyond the perimeter of the site, street rights -of - way, driveways, off-street parking and loading areas, shall not be counted towards required Usable Open Space. The proposed Mattson at Vanderbilt subdistrict language proposes 40% usable open space for the overall site area. The applicant's justification for this reduction to be located in the subdistrict language is that it is a developer commitment and provides further justification for the reduction: • The project is "...redevelopment and an infill residential project on 5.9 +/- acres." • The project is centrally located within the site. • The intent is to maintain comparable building heights with the adjacent ALFs. • The provision of an enhanced buffer on the northern property line adjacent to the Pelican Marsh Golf Course "...to ensure compatibility and increase effective open space for the site." Staff does not support the relief from zoning standards located within the GMP subdistrict. There is an appropriate process to request a deviation in the companion PUD. The justification for this reduction in the GMP subdistrict due to the request being a developer commitment is not factual since the request is a developer reduction of an LDC requirement. Staff has historically requested standards required by the GMP to be included in the subdistrict language or when developer commitments exceed the LDC minimum in providing greater assurance of completion (since a PUD Amendment could be utilized to remove the commitment in the zoning). The GMP does not include requirements for open space within the Urban, Mixed Use District, or Urban Residential Subdistrict; therefore, the open space requirement is solely an LDC issue. Zoning and Comprehensive Planning staff agree that this reduction should be requested through the companion zoning petition. The LDC requires that residential -only PUDs provide a minimum of 60% useable open space, and this should not be waived simply by adding a lesser standard in the GMP subdistrict. In addition to the requirement being removed from the GMP, staff does not support the reduction in useable open space for a dense, urban -style apartment complex. The density of 25.5 DU/A cannot meet required standards, such as the useable open space minimum and parking, for which a deviation is sought in the companion PUD petition. The justification provided for the reduction is not adequate. The inability to comply with LDC standards for required useable open space and parking appears to be a self-created circumstance caused by requesting such a high -density development. Should the Planning Commission choose to recommend approval of the reduction via the PUD petition, staff would suggest that additional public benefit be required to offset the loss of open space. This could be in the form of additional affordable housing. Residential Needs Analysis Staff, developers, and the public have well documented the need for affordable housing in Collier County. However, the need may vary by geographic area within the county and income affordability level. Further, if the need is established, the proposed site is evaluated to determine if it is the appropriate location to fulfill that need. Packet Pg. 72 9.B.a PL20230001010 The applicant provided the 2017 Urban Land Use Institute report to support the plan amendment; however, no specifics were provided regarding the report, nor was a locational analysis provided to analyze the appropriateness of this use at this site. The appropriateness of the site for residential use and the requested density must be justified, and the provision of affordable housing units should be discussed in terms of proximity to employment, goods and services, access, and transit availability. When additional information was requested, the agent responded, "The applicant is of the opinion that the demand for affordable housing units in Collier County is well -documented, and no further data is necessary to support the proposed request." A GMPA must, according to state statute, provide sufficient data and analysis to justify the proposed amendment. Staff has not found this standard to be satisfied. Compatibility: Given the area's residential character, staff finds that the requested residential use is compatible with the surrounding area. However, staff does not support the proposed density of 25.5 DU/A, which is significantly higher than, and out of character with, the surrounding community and potentially incompatible. Environmental Review: The property is located in an Urban Mix Use district. The property is zoned Ag, with 2 parcels totaling 5.88 acres. The request is to create an Urban Mixed Use district Urban Residential Subdistrict. CCME Policy 6.1.1 and Obj 7.1 have been addressed; the property has been developed and mostly impacted. A tree survey will be required to determine tree preservation amounts if needed. No EAC is required. Conservation and Coastal Management Element (COME) Review: Environmental review staff has found this project consistent with the Conservation & Coastal Management Element (CCME). The project site has been cleared; no preservation is required. The project site is 5.88 acres and consists of 12 native trees meeting the preservation standards. Transportation Planning Review: Based on the TIS, State Statues, the 2021, and the 2022 AUIR, the subject PUD can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan. The Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) indicates that the adjacent roadway network has sufficient capacity to accommodate this project within the 5-year planning period. Public Utilities Review: The project lies within the regional potable water service area and the North County Water Reclamation Facility's wastewater service area of the Collier County Water -Sewer District (CCWSD). Water and wastewater services are available via existing infrastructure within the adjacent right-of-way. Sufficient water and wastewater treatment capacities are available. Any improvements to the CCWSD's water or wastewater systems necessary to provide sufficient capacity to serve the project will be the responsibility of the owner/developer and will be conveyed to the CCWSD at no cost to the County at the time of utility acceptance. CRITERIA FOR GMP AMENDMENTS FLORIDA STATUTES: Data and analysis requirements for comprehensive plans and plan amendments are noted in Chapter 163, F.S., specifically listed below. Packet Pg. 73 9.B.a PL20230001010 Section 163.3177(1)(f), Florida Statutes: (f) All mandatory and optional elements of the comprehensive plan and plan amendments shall be based upon relevant and appropriate data and an analysis by the local government that may include, but not be limited to, surveys, studies, community goals and vision, and other data available at the time of adoption of the comprehensive plan or plan amendment. To be based on data means to react to it in an appropriate way and to the extent necessary, indicated by the data available on that particular subject at the time of adoption of the plan or plan amendment at issue. Surveys, studies, and data utilized in the preparation of the comprehensive plan may not be deemed a part of the comprehensive plan unless adopted as a part of it. Copies of such studies, surveys, data, and supporting documents for proposed plans and plan amendments shall be made available for public inspection, and copies of such plans shall be made available to the public upon payment of reasonable charges for reproduction. Support data or summaries are not subject to the compliance review process, but the comprehensive plan must be based on appropriate data. Support data or summaries may be used to aid in the determination of compliance and consistency. 2. Data must be taken from professionally accepted sources. The application of a methodology utilized in data collection or whether a particular methodology is professionally accepted may be evaluated. However, the evaluation may not include whether one accepted methodology is better than another. Original data collection by local governments is not required. However, local governments may use original data so long as methodologies are professionally accepted. 3. The comprehensive plan shall be based upon permanent and seasonal population estimates and projections, which shall either be those published by the Office of Economic and Demographic Research or generated by the local government based upon a professionally acceptable methodology. The plan must be based on at least the minimum amount of land required to accommodate the medium projections published by the Office of Economic and Demographic Research for at least a 10-year planning period unless otherwise limited under s. 380.05, including related rules of the Administration Commission. Absent physical limitations on population growth, population projections for each municipality and the unincorporated area within a county must, at a minimum, be reflective of each area's proportional share of the total county population and the total county population growth. Section 163.3177(6)(a)2. Florida Statutes: 2. The future land use plan and plan amendments shall be based upon surveys, studies, and data regarding the area, as applicable, including: a. The amount of land required to accommodate anticipated growth. b. The projected permanent and seasonal population of the area. c. The character of undeveloped land. d. The availability of water supplies, public facilities, and services. e. The need for redevelopment, including the renewal of blighted areas and the elimination of nonconforming uses inconsistent with the community's character. f. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to or closely proximate to military installations. Packet Pg. 74 9.B.a PL20230001010 g. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to an airport as defined in s. 330.35 and consistent with s. 333.02. h. The discouragement of urban sprawl. The need for job creation, capital investment, and economic development that will strengthen and diversify the community's economy. j. The need to modify land uses and development patterns within antiquated subdivisions Section 163.3177(6)(a)8. Florida Statutes: (a) A future land use plan element designating proposed future general distribution, location, and extent of the uses of land for residential uses, commercial uses, industry, agriculture, recreation, conservation, education, public facilities, and other categories of the public and private uses of land. The approximate acreage and the general range of density or intensity of use shall be provided for the gross land area included in each existing land use category. The element shall establish the long-term end toward which land use programs and activities are ultimately directed. 8. Future land use map amendments shall be based upon the following analyses: a. An analysis of the availability of facilities and services. b. An analysis of the suitability of the plan amendment for its proposed use considering the character of the undeveloped land, soils, topography, natural resources, and historic resources on site. c. An analysis of the minimum amount of land needed to achieve the goals and requirements of this section. The petitioner must provide appropriate and relevant data and analysis to address the statutory requirements for a Plan Amendment. For this petition, a narrative justification was provided in Exhibit V.D. "Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict (PL20220001010) Growth Management" as well as in response letters regarding staff concerns relative to the lack of needs assessment/market analysis and the proposed reduction of open space. Section 163.3187 Florida Statutes: [qualifications to follow the small-scale GMPA process] Process for adoption of small-scale comprehensive plan amendment. (1) A small-scale development amendment may be adopted under the following conditions: (a) The proposed amendment involves a use of 50 acres or fewer. [The subject site comprises 5.88± acres.] (b) The proposed amendment does not involve a text change to the goals, policies, and objectives of the local government's comprehensive plan but only proposes a land use change to the future land use map for a site -specific small-scale development activity. However, text changes that relate directly to and are adopted simultaneously with the small-scale future land use map amendment shall be permissible under this section. [This amendment does include a text change to the Comprehensive Plan and those text changes are directly related to the proposed future land use map amendment.] (c) The property that is the subject of the proposed amendment is not located within an area of critical state concern unless the project subject to the proposed amendment involves the construction of affordable housing units meeting the criteria of s. 420.0004(3) and is located within an area of critical state concern designated by s. 380.0552 or by the Administration 10 Packet Pg. 75 9.B.a PL20230001010 Commission pursuant to s. 380.05(1). [The subject property is not located within an Area of Critical State Concern.] (4) Comprehensive plans may only be amended in such a way as to preserve the internal consistency of the plan pursuant to s. 163.3177. Corrections, updates, or modifications of current costs which were set out as part of the comprehensive plan shall not, for the purposes of this act, be deemed to be amendments. [This amendment preserves the internal consistency of the plan and is not a correction, update, or modification of current costs that were set out as part of the comprehensive plan.] NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM) NOTES: The applicant conducted a NIM on May 24, 2023, at the Collier County Headquarters Library, Sugden Theater, located at 2385 Orange Blossom Drive in Naples. The meeting commenced at approximately 5:30 p.m. and ended at approximately 5:40 p.m. There were no in -person attendees other than the applicant's team and county staff, and two people from the general public attended via Zoom. D. Wayne Arnold, AICP, the agent, gave a brief presentation explaining the NIM process for approval and providing an overview of the proposed project. The only question was regarding where to find project information online. The NIM transcript and PowerPoint presentation are included in the CCPC backup materials. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: • There are no adverse environmental impacts as a result of this petition. • There are no known historic or archaeological resources on the subject site. • There are no transportation or public utility -related concerns as a result of this petition. • There are no concerns about impacts on other public infrastructure. • This project may create impacts on the surrounding area due to the proposed density, which is not in character with the surrounding low -density residential development. However, this can be made more acceptable by increasing the public benefit provided by this petition and providing the LDC-required amount of useable open space. • Staff does not support including a useable open space requirement in the proposed Subdistrict text; rather, it supports deferring to the LDC. Further, staff does not support a reduction of that useable open space requirement below the LDC-required 60%. • The petitioner is proposing 22.6% (34 DUs) of the total requested 150 DUs as affordable units as a "public benefit" to satisfy the requirement that all GMPAs that request a density increase in the Urban Mixed Use District must utilize Transfer of Development Rights credits OR the petition must provide "a reasonably sufficient public benefit." • Considering the density increase requested, the number of affordable housing units is inadequate. • Data and analysis submitted by the petitioner do not justify approval of this GMPA as submitted. 11 Packet Pg. 76 9.B.a PL20230001010 Staff cannot support the petition as submitted. If the Planning Commission seeks to recommend approval, staff would urge the requirement for additional public benefit to offset the 25.5 DU/A and the reduction in Open Space. LEGAL REVIEW: The County Attorney's Office reviewed this Staff Report on November 7, 2023. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends denial of the petition as submitted. Staff cannot support the requested density at this location; staff does not support including the usable open space standard in the GMP Subdistrict language; and staff does not support the proposed reduction of usable open space from 60% to 40% in a dense urban rental apartment community. However, IF the Collier County Planning Commission chooses to recommend approval of this GMPA petition, THEN, as an alternative, staff recommends the CCPC consider the following: 1. A reduction in the project density to 16 DU/A based on the subject location and inability to meet development standards and/or, 2. An increase in the public benefit in the form of additional affordable housing for the significant increase in density to a minimum of 30% based upon recent approvals and, 3. Removal of the GMPA subdistrict language related to usable open space (with disapproval of a reduction of usable open space in the companion PUD). Staff acknowledges that maintaining the 60% usable open space requirement may necessitate a density reduction and/or a building height increase. Approving a reduction in usable open space should be offset by the petition providing increased public benefit in the form of additional affordable housing units at 34%. NOTE: This petition has been tentatively scheduled for the BCC meeting on January 23, 2023 12 Packet Pg. 77 9.B.b ORDINANCE NO. 2024- AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AMENDING ORDINANCE 89-05, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT AND MAP SERIES BY CHANGING THE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF PROPERTY FROM URBAN, MIXED USE DISTRICT, URBAN RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT TO MATTSON AT VANDERBILT RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT, TO ALLOW A MAXIMUM DENSITY OF 150 MULTIFAMILY RENTAL UNITS WITH AFFORDABLE HOUSING, AND FURTHERMORE DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE ADOPTED AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 828 FEET FROM THE INTERSECTION OF VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD AND LIVINGSTON ROAD, IN SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 5.88f ACRES. [PL20220001010] WHEREAS, Collier County, pursuant to Section 163.3161, et. seq., Florida Statutes, the Community Planning Act, formerly the Florida Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, was required to prepare and adopt a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners adopted the Collier County Growth Management Plan on January 10, 1989; and WHEREAS, the Community Planning Act of 2011 provides authority for local governments to amend their respective comprehensive plans and outlines certain procedures to amend adopted comprehensive plans; and WHEREAS, 3333/3375 VBR, LLC, requested an amendment to the Future Land Use Element and Map Series; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Subsection 163.3187(1), Florida Statutes, this amendment is considered a Small -Scale Amendment; and WHEREAS, the Subdistrict property is not located in an area of critical state concern or a rural area of opportunity; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) on December 7, 2023, considered the proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan and recommended approval of said amendment to the Board of County Commissioners; and [23-CMP-01166/1833322/1]41 PL20220001010 Words underlined are additions; Words struck through are deletions. 1 of 3 Mattson at Vanderbilt SSGMPA *** *** *** *** are a break in text 12/ 12/23 Packet Pg. 78 9.B.b WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County did take action in the manner prescribed by law and held public hearings concerning the proposed adoption of the amendment to the Future Land Use Element and Map Series of the Growth Management Plan on 2024; and WHEREAS, all applicable substantive and procedural requirements of the law have been met. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: SECTION ONE: ADOPTION OF AMENDMENTS TO THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN The amendments to the Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Map and Map Series attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by reference, are hereby adopted in accordance with Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes, and shall be transmitted to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. SECTION TWO: SEVERABILITY. If any phrase or portion of this Ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion. SECTION THREE: EFFECTIVE DATE. The effective date of this plan amendment, if the amendment is not timely challenged, shall be 31 days after the state land planning agency notifies the local government that the plan amendment package is complete. If timely challenged, this amendment shall become effective on the date the state land planning agency or the Administration Commission enters a final order determining this adopted amendment to be in compliance. No development orders, development permits, or land uses dependent on this amendment may be issued or commenced before it has become effective. [23-CMP-01166/1833322/1]41 PL20220001010 Words underlined are additions; Words struck through are deletions. 2 of 3 Mattson at Vanderbilt SSGMPA *** *** *** *** are a break in text 12/ 12/23 Packet Pg. 79 9.B.b PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida this day of 2024. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: Deputy Clerk Chris Hall, Chairman Approved as to form and legality: Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney Attachment: Exhibit A — Text and Map [23-CMP-01166/1833322/1]41 PL20220001010 Words underlined are additions; Words struck through are deletions. 3 of 3 Mattson at Vanderbilt SSGMPA *** *** *** *** are a break in text 12/ 12/23 Packet Pg. 80 9.B.b Exhibit A PL20220001010 EXHIBIT A Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict (PL20220001010) Proposed amendment to the Collier County Future Land Use Element (FLUE) and Future Land Use Map (FLUM) to establish the 5.88± Acre Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict. Words underlined are additions; words are deletions. SECTION I: Amend Future Land Use Map Series, beginning on page v as follows: * FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES 140 *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** *** * Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict SECTION II: Amend "II. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY", Policy 1.5 beginning on page 9 as follows: *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 1.5: The URBAN Future Land Use Designation shall include Future Land Use Districts and Subdistricts for: A. URBAN - MIXED USE DISTRICT 1. Urban Residential Subdistrict 2. Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict 3. Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict 4. Business Park Subdistrict S. Office and Infill Commercial Subdistrict 6. PUD Neighborhood Village Center Subdistrict 7. Residential Mixed Use Neighborhood Subdistrict 8. Orange Blossom Mixed -Use Subdistrict 9. Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict 10. Henderson Creek Mixed -Use Subdistrict 11. Research and Technology Park Subdistrict 12. Buckley Mixed -Use Subdistrict 13. Commercial Mixed Use Subdistrict 14. Livingston/Radio Road Commercial Infill Subdistrict 15. Vanderbilt Beach Road Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict 16. Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict 17. Hibiscus Residential Infill Subdistrict 18. Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict 19. Mini Triangle Mixed Use Subdistrict Page 1 of 5 Words underlined are added; words struck -through are deleted. 12/11 /2023 Packet Pg. 81 Exhibit A PL20220001010 9.B.b 20. Goodlette/Pine Ridge Mixed Use Subdistrict 21. Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard East Residential Subdistrict 22. Meridian Village Mixed -Use Subdistrict 23. Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed Use Subdistrict Map 24. Immokalee Road Interchange Residential Infill Subdistrict 25. Creekside Commerce Park East Mixed Use Subdistrict 26. 26. Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict SECTION III: Amend "I. URBAN DESIGNATION", beginning on page 26 as follows: *** *** *** A. Urban Mixed Use District *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** *** 26. Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict Page 55] [beginning The 5.88-acre subdistrict. as depicted on the Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict map, is located approximately 1,100 feet east of Livingston Road on the north side of Vanderbilt Beach Road. The intent of this subdistrict is to allow for a maximum of 150 multi- family dwelling units to promote affordable and workforce housing in an urban area with transit. emDlovment centers. and Dublic infrastructure. The development of this subdistrict will be governed by the following criteria: a. Development shall be in the form of a PUD. b. The dwelling units are limited to rental units. c. The maximum number of dwelling units permitted within the subdistrict is 150 dwelling units. d. Affordable Housing Commitment: 1. Of the total units constructed the Droiect shall comply with the followine: 15% of the units will be rented to households whose incomes are up to and including 80% of the Area Median Income (AMI) for Collier County and 15% of the units will be rented to households whose incomes are up to and including 100% of the AMI for Collier County and the Page 2 of 5 Words underlined are added; words struck -through are deleted. 12/11/2023 Packet Pg. 82 Exhibit A PL20220001010 9.B.b corresponding rent limits. At time of each SDP, no less than 30% of the dwelling units will be identified as affordable and shown on the SDP with the AMI required ranges and fractional numbers will be rounded up to the nearest whole unit. These units will be committed for a period of 30 years from the date of issuance of certificate of occupancy of the first unit. Income and rent limits may be adiusted annually based on combined income and rent limit table published by the Florida Housing Finance Corporation or as otherwise Provided by Collier County. 2. As part of the annual PUD monitoring report, the developer will include an annual report that provides the progress and monitoring of occupancy of the income restricted units, including rent data for rented units, in a format approved by Collier County Community and Human Services Division. Developer aerees to annual on -site monitorine by the Countv. e. The Density Rating System is not applicable to this Subdistrict. SECTION IV: Amend "FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES", beginning page 159 as follows: *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** *** Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict [page 160] Page 3 of 5 Words underlined are added; words struck -through are deleted. 12/11/2023 Packet Pg. 83 Exhibit A 9.B.b PL2O22OOO1O1O CL a 2 W U) N � € N 1 LL Z c Na� N0 LL r r47s Tag I T-05 T56S I T318 I T52S .[ T53$ �Ijr_-�,' r-- '�16i > riL Yi Cn T475 rags - T49s J_Tsp9 T, 67S� Page 4 of 5 Words underlined are added; words struck -through are deleted. 12/11/2023 T S3 9 Packet Pg. 84 Exhibit A PL20220001010 9.B.b Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Stpbdlsiric�t 0OLLIER MINTY- FLORIDA i� ITNI 1��#Illlllillllllllllll 00 I,Qm Peet LEGEND ma LVffGONAI'.XNOU�ULTZ:GSEILhfre�MOG-RP:T Page 5 of 5 Words underlined are added; words struck -through are deleted. 12/11/2023 iz 2 Y N d N C C O N r R O O O O O N N O N J d 27, Q Packet Pg. 85 9.B.d SIGN POSTING INSTRUCTIONS (CHAPTER 8, COLLIER COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT) A zoning sign(s) must be posted by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent on the parcel for a minimum of fifteen (15) calendar days in advance of the first public hearing and said sign(s) must be maintained by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent through the Board of County Commissioners Hearing. Below are general guidelines for signs, however these guidelines should not be construed to supersede any requirement of the LDC. For specific sign requirements, please refer to the Administrative Code, Chapter 8 E. 1. The sign(s) must be erected in full view of the public, not more than five (5) feet from the nearest street right-of-way or easement. 2. The sign(s) must be securely affixed by nails, staples, or other means to a wood frame or to a wood panel and then fastened securely to a post, or other structure. The sign may not be affixed to a tree or other foliage. 3. The petitioner or the petitioner's agent must maintain the sign(s) in place, and readable condition until the requested action has been heard and a final decision rendered. If the sign(s) is destroyed, lost, or rendered unreadable, the petitioner or the petitioner's agent must replace the sign(s) NOTE: AFTER THE SIGN HAS BEEN POSTED, THIS AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE SHOULD BE RETURNED NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORKING DAYS BEFORE THE FIRST HEARING DATE TO THE ASSIGNED PLANNER. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER BEFORE THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, PERSONALLY APPEARED SHARON UMPENHOUR WHO ON OATI SAYS THAT HUSHE HAS POSTED PROPERNOTICE AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 10.03.00 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE ON THE PARCEL COVERED IN PETITION NUMBER(S) PL20220001010 and PL20220001011. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT OR AGENT Sharon Umpenhour as Senior Planning Technician for Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. NAME (TYPED OR PRINTED) STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF LEE 3800 Via Del Rey STREET OR P.O. BOX Bonita Springs, Florida 34110 CITY, STATE ZIP The foregoing instrument was sworn to and subscribed before me this 17 day of November , 2023, by Sharon Umpenhour as Senior Planning Technician for O. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A., personally known to me or- ho produced asidentifie, tiers and who did/did not take an oath. Signature of Notary Public Carin J. Dwyer Printed Name of Notary Public My Commission Expires: (Stamp with serial number) Rev. 3/4/2015 Packet Pg. 86 9.B.d Packet Pg. 87 � � f%: a##+`T7 *% ,"FI ++ ar 4 -k w k of, ++ j ti I i Irk � . ■ t '� FIt ti ► vLe '41. NL ) 4 or .00 is 7 . M M * A' Mai .0 A 0 0.4 a v - ML & k • ti ti v � r k � � � ilk �i � • � *y� � ■ ti � � • � � � F � * � # , 1 1AW Ijnr LgL!MWpP r� � _� � * ' * � � � ; f Jy r k - %L d4ff9a 1Ohv il qffS�kL IL kkLV, L' N6LI Nl L'p I I'l tXIL b 4 r -10 / 4k1, . N qk k -'d .0 do Ob I%IVF. ,. qwi. : o ■ a Y ■ letPPjoO4.# FWF1N_ 4ft%NMqeOb�PpT 0N'6 L 1p r . _ 4 r o { t s Ar Mr- # } _ ' 1 ip _j + . ■ �, # k10 x Y 5 a ; J k i • -+ y ♦ ii % * .I J ' - ti t * # r 1 t `� s- t fir . i ti 1 � 4 5L t h p or * ■ 7 } ;1 dL Ar iAv! r 0 F s a � _ dr 1 1 1 AF. AP MOM — AP 1 ' dp �Ir IL 'S Nq6h6 AF A11111� I qm& Aff P% 17 C; 400OF Awww""W_ EM 'AOft P-00 a-mok £ 9.B.e ;-2y65 NOTICE OF PUBLIC NEARING NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCES Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) at 9:00 A.M. on January 23, 2024, in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room, Third Floor, Collier Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Naples FL to consider: AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AMENDING ORDINANCE 89-05, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT AND MAP SERIES BY CHANGING THE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF PROPERTY FROM URBAN, MIXED USE DISTRICT, URBAN RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT TO MATTSON AT VANDERBILT RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT, TO ALLOW A MAXIMUM DENSITY OF 150 MULTIFAMILY RENTAL UNITS WITH AFFORDABLE HOUSING, AND FURTHERMORE DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE ADOPTED AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 848 FEET FROM THE INTERSECTION OF VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD AND LIVINGSTON ROAD, IN SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 5.883 ACRES.(PL202200010t0] AND AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COWER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2004.41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM A RURAL AGRICULTURAL (A) ZONING DISTRICT TO A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) ZONING DISTRICT FOR THE PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS MATTSON AT VANDERBILT RPUD, TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF UP TO 150 MULTI -FAMILY RENTAL UNITS WITH AFFORDABLE HOUSING ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 828 FEET FROM THE INTERSECTION OF VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD AND LIVINGSTON ROAD, IN SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, CONSISTING OF 5.88s ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. IPL20220001oil] tAJ_. I I Project t ! j Loca#ion - ,_.. I fi , ==%Vand9rbiIt eachr I� IIR T } i A copy of the proposed Ordinances is on file with the Clerk to the Board and is available for Inspection. All Interested parties are Invited to attend and be heard. All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County Manager, prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to three (3) minutes on any item. The selection of any individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group Is encouraged. If recognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted ten (10) minutes to speak on an item. Written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. All materials used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. As part of an ongoing initiative to encourage public involvement, the public will have the opportunity to provide public comments remotely, as well as in person, during this proceeding. Individuals who would like to participate remotely should register through the link provided within the specific eventtmeeting entry on the Calendar of Events on the County website at www.colliercountyfl.gov/our-county/visitors/ calendar -of -events after the agenda is posted on the County webs". Regisiratfon should be done in advance of the public meeting, or any deadline specified within the public meeting notice. Individuals who register will; receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how they can participate remotely in this meeting. Remote participation is provided as a courtesy and is at the user's risk. The County is not responsible for technical issues. For additional information about the meeting, please call Geoffrey Willig at 252-8369 or email to Geoffrey. Willig0colliercounty8.gov. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of The proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two (2) days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA RICK LOCASTRO, CHAIRMAN CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT & COMPTROLLER By: Marine Forgue, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) ND-38323576 N a m v Z m v D D Z C D N O N A Z a P H v a P C Z N Packet Pg. 89 9.B.e NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCES Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) at 9:00 A.M. on January 23, 2024, in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room, Third Floor, Collier Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Naples FL to consider: AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AMENDING ORDINANCE 89-05, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT AND MAP SERIES BY CHANGING THE LAND USE .DESIGNATION OF PROPERTY FROM URBAN, MIXED USE DISTRICT, URBAN RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT TO MATTSON AT VANDERBILT RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT, TO ALLOW A MAXIMUM DENSITY OF 150 MULTIFAMILY RENTAL UNITS WITH AFFORDABLE HOUSING, AND FURTHERMORE DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE ADOPTED AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 828 FEET FROM THE INTERSECTION OF VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD AND LIVINGSTON ROAD, IN SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 5.884: ACRES. [PL20220001010] AND AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM A RURAL AGRICULTURAL (A) ZONING DISTRICT TO A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) ZONING DISTRICT FOR THE PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS MATTSON AT VANDERBILT RPUD, TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF UP TO 150 MULTI -FAMILY RENTAL UNITS WITH AFFORDABLE HOUSING ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 828 FEET FROM THE INTERSECTION OF VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD AND LIVINGSTON ROAD, IN SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, CONSISTING OF 5.88t ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PL20220001011] (See map below) A copy of the proposed Ordinances is on file with the Clerk to the Board and is available for inspection. All interested parties are invited to attend and be heard. Packet Pg. 90 9.B.e All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County Manager prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to three (3) minutes on any item. The selection of any individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted ten (10) minutes to speak on an item. Written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. All materials used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. As part of an ongoing initiative to encourage public involvement, the public will have the opportunity to provide public comments remotely, as well as in person, during this proceeding. Individuals who would like to participate remotely should register through the link provided within the specific event/meeting entry on the Calendar of Events on the County website at www.colliercountyfl.gov/our-county/visitors/calendar-of-events after the agenda is posted on the County website. Registration should be done in advance of the public meeting, or any deadline specified within the public meeting notice. Individuals who register will receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how they can participate remotely in this meeting. Remote participation is provided as a courtesy and is at the user's risk. The County is not responsible for technical issues. For additional information about the meeting, please call Geoffrey Willig at 252-8369 or email to Geoffrey.Willig@colliercountyfl.gov. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tam iami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two (2) days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA RICK LOCASTRO, CHAIRMAN CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK By: Merline Forgue, Deputy Clerk ( SEAL) Posted to notices.01lierclerk.com on January 3, 2024. Clerk to the,Board Dine:. Packet Pg. 91 9.B.e 2 �L d .y L d m O N r.+ m O r O r O O O N N O N J d O t0 ti N O O ti N 06 N O I ti N N 0 fC C Cu Q Packet Pg. 92 Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict PL20220001010 CCPC Hearing Backup Application and Supporting Documents ® GradyMinor Civf] Fngfneem • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134 • 239-947-1144 • engineering@gradyminor.com • www.gradyminor.com GradyMinor Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects March 14, 2023 Amended April 27, 2023 Ms. Katherine Eastley Collier County Growth Management Department Comprehensive Planning Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 RE: Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict (PL20220001010), Submittal 1 Dear Ms. Eastley: Enclosed, please find the application for a proposed small-scale comprehensive plan amendment for a 5.88± acre project located at 3375 and 3333 Vanderbilt Beach Road. The GMPA proposes to modify the FLUE map to add a new subdistrict to allow a multi -family rental development with a maximum of 150 multi -family rental dwelling units. A companion PUD Rezone application (Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD rezone application (PL20220001011) has been filed along with this petition. Documents filed with submittal 1 include the following: 1. Cover letter 2. Expedited Review Certification 3. Application 4. Exhibit LD Consultants 5. Exhibit IV.B Revised Text 6. Exhibit IV.0 Proposed FLU Map 7. Exhibit IV.E Proposed Inset Map 8. Exhibit V.A Land Use 9. Exhibit V.B Existing FLU Map 10. Exhibit V.0 Environmental Data 11. Exhibit V.D Growth Management 12. Exhibit V.D1 Market Analysis 13. Exhibit V.E Public Facilities Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. Ph. 239-947-1144 • Fax. 239-947-0375 3800 Via Del Rey EB 0005151 • LB 0005151 • LC 26000266 Bonita Springs, FL 34134 www.gradyminor.com Ms. Katherine Eastley RE: Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict (PL20220001010), Submittal 1 March 14, 2023 Page 2 of 2 14. Exhibit V.E1 Traffic Impact Statement 15. Warranty Deeds 16. Affidavit of Authorization 17. Addressing Checklist 18. Pre-app Notes Please feel free to contact me should you have any questions. Sincerely, <--D- �P� D. Wayne Arnold, AICP c: 3333/3375 VBR, LLC Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. GradyMinor File (VBRRZ-22) O ICY C014nty Public Services Department Community & Human Services Division CERTIFICATE OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING EXPEDITED REVIEW Name of Development: 3375 and 3333 Vanderbilt Beach Road Address/Location: 3375 and 3333 Vanderbilt Beach Road ApplicantlAgent: Wayne Arnold & Rich Yovanovich phone: (239) 947.1144 Email: w� aM45�aradymmr iwmnuvic,awkWWfim.mm Size of Property: 5-88+1- Acres Proposed Use: multi -family rental dwelling units Total Number of Residential Units Planned: 150 Number of Affordable Housing Units Planned: 34 # Rental # Owner 17 17 Current % of Affordable Units: 22.7 Area Median Income (AMI) Target 120%-140% GAP Income 80% - 120% Moderate Income 50% - 80% Low Income 30% - 50% Very -Low Income 0% - 30% Extremely -Low Income Threshold to qualify: 20% Permit Number, if available: PL20220001010and PL20220001011 Proposed Land Use Restriction: G) PUD Restriction or AHDB Agreement 0 Developer Agreement 0 Impact Fee Deferral Agreement 0 Grant Restriction ® Other: I hereby certify that the above -described project meets the definition of providing affordable housing in Collier County and as such is entitled to participate in the County's "Expedited Review Procedures of Affordable Housing" as described in Resolution No. 2018-40. By: Date: Community & Human Services Division By: ) — Date: March s, 2023 Buildert Ownert Dev per! Contractor This Certification must be submitted to the Growth Management Department with your permit application package, or plan revisions, within nine months of date of issuance. Community & Human Services Division • 3339 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 211 • Naples, Florida 34112-5361 239-252-CARE (2273) • 239-252-CAFE (2233) • 239-252-4230 (RSVP) • w&w. c ol li e rg ov. n eYh um an s ery ice s APPLICATION NUMBER: PL20220001010 DATE RECEIVED: PRE -APPLICATION CONFERENCE DATE: This application, with all required supplemental data and information, must be completed and accompanied by the appropriate fee, and returned to the Growth Management Department 239-252- 2400, Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104. The application is to be reviewed by staff for sufficiency within 30 calendar days following the filing deadline. The applicant will be notified, in writing, of the sufficiency determination. If insufficient, the applicant will have 30 days to remedy the deficiencies. For additional information on the processing of the application, see Resolution 12-234. If you have any questions, please contact the Comprehensive Planning Section at 239-252-2400. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS I. GENERAL INFORMATION A. Name of Applicant: David J. Stevens Company: 3333/3375 VBR LLC Address: 3838 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 402 City Naples State Florida Zip Code 34103 Phone Number: 239.261.3400 Fax Number: Email Address: David@ipcnaples.com B. Name of Agent* D. Wayne Arnold, AICP 0 THIS WILL BE THE PERSON CONTACTED FOR ALL BUSINESS RELATED TO THE PETITION. Company: Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. Address: 3800 Via Del Rev City Bonita Springs State Florida Zip Code 34134 Phone Number: 239-947-1 144 Fax Number: Email Address: warnold@gradyminor.com B.1 Name of Agent* Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. 0 THIS WILL BE THE PERSON CONTACTED FOR ALL BUSINESS RELATED TO THE PETITION. Company: Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. Address: 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 City Naples State Florida Zip Code 34103 Phone Number: 239-435-3535 Fax Number: Email Address: ryovanovich@cyklawfirm.com C. Name of Owner (s) of Record: 3333/3375 VBR LLC Address: 3838 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 402 City Naples State Florida Zip Code 34103 Phone Number: 239.261.3400 Fax Number: Email Address: David@ipcnaples.com D. Name, Company, Address and Qualifications of all consultants and other professionals providing information contained in this application, as well as Qualifications of the Agent identified above. See Exhibit I.D II. Disclosure of Interest Information: a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: Name and Address % of Ownership N.A. b. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address % of Ownership 3333/3375 VBR LLC, 3838 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 402, Naples 100 FL 34103 David J. Stevens (Chairman, Director, President, Treasurer) - Ownership Interest Clinton L. Sherwood (Director, Vice President, Secretary) - Ownership Interest C. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest: Name and Address % of Ownership N.A. d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners: Name and Address % of Ownership N.A. e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, orpartners: Name and Address % of Ownership Roers Acquisitions LLC, Two Carlson Parkway, Suite 400, 100 Plymouth, MN 55447 Brian Roers - 50% owner Kent Roers - 50% owner Date of Contract: February 3, 2023 If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, ortrust: Name and Address N.A. g. Date subject property acquired 2022 ❑ Leased: Term of lease years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Date of option: December 31, 2023 Date option terminates: N.A. or Anticipated closing date: N.A. NOTE: Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. III. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: A. PARCEL I.D. NUMBER: 00200240000 and 00202280000 B. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, LESS THE SOUTH 150.00 FEET FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, THENCE RUN S. 89156'12" E., ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 31, FOR A DISTANCE OF 991.18 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 31; THENCE RUN N 02011'42" W., ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 31, FOR A DISTANCE OF 150.12 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD. A 150 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY AS SHOWN ON FDOT RIGHT-OF-WAY MAP SECTION 03512-2601, DATED 11-21-78, SAID POINT LYING 150.00 FEET NORTH OF, AS MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 31 AND ALSO BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL OF LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE CONTINUE N. 0201 1'42" W., ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 31, FOR A DISTANCE OF 517.35 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 31; THENCE RUN S. 89056'42' E., ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 31, FOR A DISTANCE OF 330.09 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 31. THENCE RUN S. 02013,161, E. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 31, FOR A DISTANCE OF 517.41 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH RIGHT- OF-WAY LINE OF SAID VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD; THENCE RUN N. 89'56'12" W. PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 31 AND ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT- OF-WAY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 330.33 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. AND THE EAST 1 /2 OF THE WEST 1 /2 OF THE EAST 1 /2 OF THE SOUTH 1 /2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1 /4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4, LESS THE SOUTH 150 FEET OF SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA CONTAINING 5.88 ACRES, MORE OR LESS C. GENERAL LOCATION: North side of Vanderbilt Beach Road approximately 0.75 miles east of Livingston Road. D. Section: 31 Township: E. PLANNING COMMUNITY: Urban Estates G. SIZE IN ACRES: 5.88± Range: TAZ: 2335 H. ZONING: A, Agricultural I. FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION(S): Urban Designation, Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict J. SURROUNDING LAND USE PATTERN: Residential, golf course and assisted living - Exhibit V.A and V.B IV. TYPE OF REQUEST: A. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN ELEMENT (S) TO BE AMENDED: Housing Element Traffic Circulation Sub -Element Aviation Sub -Element Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element Solid Waste Sub -Element Capital Improvement Element X Future Land Use Element Immokalee Master Plan Recreation/Open Space Mass Transit Sub -Element Potable Water Sub -Element NGWAR Sub -Element Drainage Sub -Element CCME Element Golden Gate Master Plan B. AMEND PAGE (S): v, 9, 55 and 160 OF THE: Future Land Use Element AS FOLLOWS: (Use Stroke Ito identify language to be deleted; Use Underline to identify language to be added). Attach additional pages if necessary: See Exhibit IV C. AMEND FUTURE LAND USE MAP(S) DESIGNATION FROM Urban Designation, Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict TO Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict - See Exhibit IV.0 D. AMEND OTHER MAP(S) AND EXHIBITS AS FOLLOWS: (Name & Page #) E. DESCRIBE ADDITIONAL CHANGES REQUESTED: Create new subdistrict map - Exhibit IV.E V. REQUIRED INFORMATION: NOTE: ALL AERIALS MUST BE AT A SCALE OF NO SMALLER THAN I" = 400'. At least one copy reduced to 8- 1/2 x 1 1 shall be provided of all aerials and/or maps. A. LAND USE Exhibit V.A Provide general location map showing surrounding developments (PUD, DRI's, existing zoning) with subject property outlined. Exhibit V.A Provide most recent aerial of site showing subject boundaries, source, and date. Exhibit V.A Provide a map and summary table of existing land use and zoning within a radius of 300 feet from boundaries of subject property. FUTURE LAND USE AND DESIGNATION Exhibit V.B Provide map of existing Future Land Use Designation(s) of subject property and adjacent lands, with acreage totals for each land use designation on the subject property. C. ENVIRONMENTAL Exhibit V.0 Provide most recent aerial and summary table of acreage of native habitats and soils occurring on site. HABITAT IDENTIFICATION MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH THE FDOT-FLORIDA LAND USE, COVER AND FORMS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (FLUCCS CODE). NOTE: THIS MAY BE INDICATED ON SAME AERIAL AS THE LAND USE AERIAL IN "A" ABOVE. Exhibit V.0 Provide a summary table of Federal (US Fish & Wildlife Service) and State (Florida Game & Freshwater Fish Commission) listed plant and animal species known to occur on the site and/or known to inhabit biological communities similar to the site (e.g. panther or black bear range, avian rookery, bird migratory route, etc.) Identify historic and/or archaeological sites on the subject property. D. GROWTH MANAGEMENT Reference , F.A.C. and Collier County's Capital Improvements Element Policy 1.1.2 (Copies attached). 1. INSERT "Y" FOR YES OR "N" FOR NO IN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING: N Is the proposed amendment located in an Area of Critical State Concern? (Reference , F.A.C.). IF so, identify area located in ACSC. N Is the proposed amendment directly related to a proposed Development of Regional Impact pursuant to Chapter 380 F.S.? (Reference , F.A.C.) Y/N - Exhibit V.D Is the proposed amendment directly related to a proposed Small Scale Development Activity pursuant to Subsection 163.3187 (1) (c), F.S.? Does the proposed amendment create a significant impact in population which is defined as a potential increase in County -wide population by more than 5% of population projections? (Reference Capital Improvement Element Policy 1.1.2). If yes, indicate mitigation measures being proposed in conjunction with the proposed amendment. Y/Y - Exhibit V.D1 Does the proposed land use cause an increase in density and/or intensity to the uses permitted in a specific land use designation and district identified (commercial, industrial, etc.) or is the proposed land use a new land use designation or district? (Reference F.A.C.). If so, provide data and analysis to support the suitability of land for the proposed use, and of environmentally sensitive land, ground water and natural resources. (Reference , F.A.C.) PUBLIC FACILITIES l . Provide the existing Level of Service Standard (LOS) and document the impact the proposed change will have on the following public facilities: Exhibit V.E Potable Water Exhibit V.E Sanitary Sewer Exhibit V.E1 Arterial & Collector Roads; Name specific road and LOS - Vanderbilt Beach Road Exhibit V.E Drainage Exhibit V.E Solid Waste Exhibit V.E Parks: Community and Regional If the proposed amendment involves an increase in residential density, or an increase in intensity for commercial and/or industrial development that would cause the LOS for public facilities to fall below the adopted LOS, indicate mitigation measures being proposed in conjunction with the proposed amendment. (Reference Capital Improvement Element Objective 1 and Policies) 2. Exhibit V.E Provide a map showing the location of existing services and public facilities that will serve the subject property (i.e. water, sewer, fire protection, police protection, schools and emergency medical services. 3. Exhibit V.E Document proposed services and public facilities, identify provider, and describe the effect the proposed change will have on schools, fire protection and emergency medical services. F. OTHER Identify the following areas relating to the subject property: Zoned AH - 10', X and X500 Flood zone based on Flood Insurance Rate Map data (FIRM). N.A. Location of wellfields and cones of influence, if applicable. (Identified on Collier County Zoning Maps) N.A. Coastal High Hazard Area, if applicable N.A. High Noise Contours (65 LDN or higher) surrounding the Naples Airport, if applicable (identified on Collier County Zoning Maps). G. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION $16,700.00 non-refundable filing fee made payable to the Board of County Commissioners due at time of submittal. (Plus, proportionate share of advertising costs) Provided $9,000.00 non-refundable filing fee for a Small -Scale Amendment made payable to the Board of County Commissioners due at time of submittal. (Plus, proportionate share of advertising costs) Provided Proof of ownership (copy of deed) Provided Notarized Letter of Authorization if Agent is not the Owner (See attached form) Provided Addressing Checklist Provided Preapplication Meeting Notes * If you have held a pre -application meeting within 9 months prior to submitted date and paid the pre -application fee of $500.00 at the meeting, deduct that amount from the above application fee amount when submitting your application. All pre -application fees are included in the total application submittal fee if petition submitted within 9 months of pre -application meeting date. Otherwise the overage will be applied to future proportionate share advertising costs. * Maps shall include: North arrow, name and location of principal roadways and shall be at a scale of 1 "=400' or at a scale as determined during the pre -application meeting. *All attachments should be consistently referenced as attachments or exhibits, and should be labelled to correlate to the application form, e.g. "Exhibit I.D." * Planning Community, TAZ map, Traffic Analysis Zone map, Zoning maps, and Future Land Use Maps. Some maps are available on the Zoning Division website depicting information herein: Zoning Services Section: Comprehensive Planning Section: THIS HAS CHANGED SINCE DCA BECAME DEO. SEE GMP PAGE 2011 UPDATES: https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/your-government/divisions-s-z/zoning-division/zoning-services- section/land-use-commission-district-maps Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict (PL20220001010) Exhibit 1.13 Professional Consultants Planner/Project Management: D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, FL 34134 239.947.1144 warnold@gradyminor.com Land Use Attorney: Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq Coleman, Yovanovich and Koester, P.A. 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 Naples, FL 34103 239.435.3535 ryovanovich@cyklawfirm.com Environmental Consultant: Marco Espinar, Biologist Collier Environmental Consultants, Inc. 3211 68th Street SW Naples, FL 34105 239-263-2687 marcoe@prodigy.net Traffic Engineer: James M. Banks, P.E., President JMB Transportation Engineering, Inc. 4711 7th Avenue SW Naples, FL 34119 239.919.2767 jmbswte@msn.com May 4, 2023 w GradyMinor Exhibit ID Consultants-rl.docx Civil E Rgfneem • Land Surveyors • Plan ncrs • Landscape Architects Page 1 of 1 Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, Fl, 34134 • 239-947-1144 • engineering@gradyminor.com • www.gradyminor.corn Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict Exhibit IV.0 - Proposed Future Land Use Designation w M 3 a N_ M 0 5i Vanderbilt Beach RD Village Walk CIR Legend N W + E S Subject Property - 5.88+/- Acres Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict Vanderbilt Beach Rd Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict Urban Residential Subdistrict Source: Esri, Maxar, Earthstar Geographics, and the GIS User Community Grad Mino 230 115 0 230 Feet ji I ':roneera * bandRy Om Pl nnm I and5cape +Audited Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict Exhibit IV.E - Proposed New Inset Map Legend = Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict N W + E S Grad Mino 570 285 0 570 Feet Clv[IFngineera*band eyom ►PI "Cla I andwap • '.I011tc-7i. - , n,, Till �w ri( r dt ` + 300 FOOT RADIUS djPI ZONED: PELICAN MARSH DRI/PUD USE: GOLF COURSE, RESIDENTIAL *_ N 0 N' t Z cn z I m t ..o D= r,.. I cn m Cn� I N� Cn Cn D rrn -n SUBJECT PROPERTY I p m s 00 �_ ;13 Z N Zr I -n� D� _ _ 0Cn F n VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD cv ZONED: VINEYARDS DRI/PUD 0 USE: RESIDENTIAL v ,. ®"M SUBJECT PROPERTY - 5.88± ACRES .. _ Tel EXISTING FLUE: URBAN DESIGNATION, MIXED USE DISTRICT, URBAN RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT _ EXISTING ZONING: A, AGRICULTURAL ADJ. PROPERTY ZONING LAND USE - NORTH PELICAN MARSH DRI/PUD GOLF COURSE, RESIDENTIAL k EAST THE VANDERBILT TRUST CFPUD ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY SOUTH VINEYARDS DRI/PUD ROW AND RESIDENTIAL WEST BRADFORD SQUARE MPUD ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY 0 tso 300' p SCALE: 1" = 300' WHEN PLOTTED @ 8.5" X 11- _ MATTSON AT VANDERBILT RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT SCALE: 0. Grady Mmorand As . [.,,. P.A. aon o rL ©GradyMinor 3R0un:�uri"N EXHIBIT V.A. — ND USE Va - Roasprings.P:-da 34131 REVISED APRIL 27, 2023 nATERRz ni Civil Engineers . Land Surveyors . Planners . Landscape Architects xA n: _ Cert. arAdh.EB0005151 Cert. oFAdh.LB0005151 Brain— LC 26000266 SOURCE: COLLIER COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER - B-Ita Springs: 239.947.1144 a rra.Grady111nor.com Fort MyC,S: 239.690.4380 FLOWN: DEC 2022 SHEET 1 OF 1 a Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict Exhibit V.B - Existing Future Land Use Designation ►+.i • Urban Designation, Mixed Use District, a •rUrban Residential Subdistrict w M 3 a N_ M 0 5i Vanderbilt Beach RD Village Walk CIR Legend Subject Property - 5.88+/- Acres N W + E S Vanderbilt Beach Rd Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict I Urban Residential Subdistrict Source: Esri, Maxar, Earthstar Geographics, and the GIS User Community Grad Mino 230 115 0 230 Feet ji I ':roneera * bandRy Om Pl nnm I and5cape Aochitect, 3.08.00 Environmental Data Purpose As per requirements in LDC Sections 3.08.00 and questions in the CU Checklist Preparation Of Environmental Data Preparation of Environmental Data, Environmental Data Submittal Requirement shall be prepared by an individual with academic credentials and experience in the area of environmental science or natural resource management. Academic credentials and experience shall be a bachelor's or higher degree in one of the biological sciences with at least two years of ecological or biological professional experience in the State of Florida Qualifications of Environmental Consultant Collier Environmental Consultants Inc. 2/96 - Present 3211 6811' Street SW Naples, Florida 34105 Marco A. Espinar- Biologist Environmental Data. The following shall be submitted where applicable to evaluate projects. A) Wetlands i) Identify on Current Aerial / the location of all Collier County I SFWMD Jurisdictional wetlands according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System FLUCFCS The project consists of two parcels totally approximately 4.84 acres. The project site is located in Section 31, Township 48, Range 26; in Collier County, Florida. The parcel is located just east of the intersection of Livingston Road and Vanderbilt Beach Road. The parcels are o the north side of Vanderbilt Beach Road. The east parcel consists of 3.9I acres and was an equestrian center. There are stables, paddocks, round pens everything associated with equine husbandry. The site is entirely cleared of native habitat. There are mostly landscape trees such as queen palms. There are a few live oaks. The west parcel consists of 1.93 acres. This parcel has a dog kennel along Vanderbilt Beach Road. Towards the rear (north) is a single family home with a swimming pool. There is also an excavated area, pond, with rip -rap along the shore bank. The area is covered with Brazilian pepper. This site is void of native habitat. There are a few scattered Slash pines and cypress. There is a heavy presence of exotic vegetation. See Attached Location Maps, Vegetation Maps / FLUCCS Maps B) Listed Species and Bald Eagle Nests and Nest Protection Zones i) Provide a wildlife survey for the nests of bald eagle and for listed species known to inhabit biological communities similar to those existing on site. The survey shall be conducted in accordance with the guidelines or recommendations of the FFWCC and the USFWS. Survey times may be reduced or waived where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low as determined by the FFWCC and USFWS. Where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low, the survey time may be reduced or waived by the County Manager or designee. Wildlife Listed Species Study (LDC10.02.3.A.2.m) A brief examination of the parcel found no listed vertebrates on site. These two parcels have been developed. Both are entirely cleared of native habitat. A few native and landscape tree are scattered throughout. The availability of suitable habitat for any vertebrate is quite limited. The parcel is cleared and does not provide potential for any denning, habitation and/or foraging. The parcel is also surrounded by development, The parcel was traversed and examined, Potential species for such a small parcel would be fox squirrels and/or Gopher tortoises. At the time of this inspection no burrows and/or animals were encountered. The project site does provide some foraging for traversing birds. This project meets the Objective of CCNIE Objective 7.1. CCME OBJECTIVE 7. ] : Direct incompatible land uses away from listed animal species and their habitats. (The County relies on the listing process of State and Federal agencies to identify species that require special protection because of their endangered, threatened, or species of special concern status. Listed animal species are those species that the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission has designated as endangered, ii) Provide Listed Plants identified in LDC Section 3.04.03 See Attached Vegetation List / FLUCCS Code Map This parcel is cleared of vegetation. A few trees such as Slash pines, oaks and cabbage palm are present. A complete list of the vegetation encountered has been provided. See: Attached Vegetation List / FLUCCS Code Map No listed plants encountered, iii) Wildlife Management Plans in accordance with LDC Section 3.04.00 See Attached Listed Species Study, Black bear management plan may be required at the time of SDP. C) Native Vegetation Preservation i) For Sites or Portions of Sites Cleared of Native Vegetation or in Agricultural Use: Not Applicable ii) Identify on a current aerial the acreage, location and community types of all upland and wetland habitats on the project site, according to the FLUCFCS system and provide a legend foe each of the FLUCFS codes identified. Aerials and overlay information must be legible at the scale provided. Provide calculations for the acreage of native vegetation required to be retained on site. Include the above referenced calculations and aerials on the SDP or PPL. In a separate report, demonstrate how the preserve criteria pursuant to LDC section 3.05.07 have been meet. Location Maps / Aerials (LDC 10. 02.3 . A.2. m) Aerials and location maps have been provided. The project consists of two parcels totally approximately 4.84 acres. The project site is located in Section 31, Township 48, Range 26; in Collier County, Florida. The parcel is located just east of the intersection of Livingston Road and Vanderbilt Beach Road. The parcels are o the north side of Vanderbilt Beach Road. The east parcel consists of 3.91 acres and was an equestrian center. There are stables, paddocks, round pens everything associated with equine husbandry. The site is entirely cleared of native habitat. There are mostly landscape trees such as queen palms. There are a few live oaks. The west parcel consists of 1.93 acres. This parcel has a dog kennel along Vanderbilt Beach Road. Towards the rear (north) is a single family home with a swimming pool. There is also an excavated area, pond, with rip -rap along the shore bank. The area is covered with Brazilian pepper. This site is void of native habitat. There are a few scattered Slash pines and cypress. There is a heavy presence of exotic vegetation. See Attached Location Maps, Vegetation Maps / FLUCCS Maps Native Vegetation Calculation (LDC3.05.07.A.) This parcel was legally cleared. As such the property will be governed by: LDC 3.05.07 A.2 and 3.05.07 B.2 ii.) Identify on a current aerial the acreages, location and community types Location Maps / Aerials (LDC10.02.3.A.2.m) The project consists of two parcels totally approximately 4.84 acres. The project site is located in Section 31, Township 48, Range 26; in Collier County, Florida. The parcel is located just east of the intersection of Livingston Road and Vanderbilt Beach Road. The parcels are o the north side of Vanderbilt Beach Road. See Attached Location Maps, Vegetation Maps / FLUCCS Maps 3.05.07 Preservation Standards This site is totally void of any native habitat. This site does have native trees scattered throughout. A tree survey will be conducted prior to Site Development, and an exhibit attached showing species, locations and tree size. ]3.05.07 — Preservation Standards A.(1) Native vegetative communities. The preservation of native vegetation shall include all naturally occurring strata including canopy, understory and ground cover emphasizing the largest contiguous area possible, except as otherwise provided in section 1.05.07 H. Le. The term native vegetation is further defined as a vegetative community having 25 percent or more canopy coverage or highest existing vegetative strata of native plant species. In the absence of other native strata, herbaceous vegetation not typically associated with the re -growth of native vegetative communities, commonly known as weeds, shall not be considered native vegetation for the purpose of preservation. Since the site has no native habitat/vegetation, No preserve will be provided. The site does have a few native trees. The site has (12) Slash pines that meet the criteria. Exhibit attached as Tree Survey. A) 2. Native trees. Where a property has been legally cleared and only native trees remain and the native ground cover replaced with lawn or pasture, then only the native trees shall be retained. The percent requirement of native trees required to be retained shall be by tree count based on the percent requirement for native vegetation pursuant to 3.05.07 B. Only slash pine trees with an 8 inch DBH or greater, hardwood trees with a 18 inch DBH or greater, or palms with a minimum of 8 foot of clear trunk, shall be used for calculating this requirement. For hardwood trees, every 6 inches or fraction thereof over 18 inch DBH shall count as an additional tree (18 inch DBH = 1 tree, 24 inch DBH = 2 trees, 26 inch DBH = 3 trees, etc.). Slash pine trees and cabbage palms shall only be retained on portions of the property with a density of 8 or more trees per acre. Trees which are unhealthy or dying, as determined by a certified arborist or any individual meeting the qualifications in 3.05.07 H.l.g.iii, shall not be retained or used for calculation. Native slash pine trees shall be retained in clusters, if the trees occur in clusters, with no encroachment (soil disturbance) within the drip line or within 30 feet of the trunk, whichever is greater, of any slash pine or hardwood tree. Encroachment may occur within these distances where evaluation by a certified arborist determines that it will not affect the health of the trees. Trees which die shall be replaced with 10 foot high native canopy trees on a one for one basis. Native trees with a DBH of two feet or more shall be replaced with three 10-foot high native canopy trees. Areas of retained trees shall not be subject to the requirements of 3.05.07 H. Where trees cannot be retained, the percent requirement of trees shall be made up elsewhere on -site with trees planted in clusters utilizing 10 foot high native canopy trees planted on a one for one basis. Where native trees with a DBH of two feet or more cannot be retained, a minimum of three 10-foot high native canopy trees shall be planted per tree removed of this size. Trees planted to satisfy this requirement shall be planted in open space areas equivalent in size to the area of canopy of the trees removed. This planted open space shall be in addition to the area used to satisfy the minimum landscape requirements pursuant to 4.06.00 This will be consistent with Goal 6 of Collier County GMP's Objective 6.1 Protect native communities through the application of minimum preservation requirements. Clearly identify the location of all preserves: The preserve area has been identified on the Exhibit Master plan. Soil Ground Water Sampling Natural Site LOCATION MAPS 7 iY GULDEH OAKS LNG D• 1 D 1 I >;� I • D Z D m SILVER S•PHC,S A/ft� �- a,%, '' n w 1 ,� . ~ STANDING OAKS LN— p• 1({ P� KF CID m 11�� 111 o J �r# ♦'p _ III SHADYOAKGLN� III \` • s f / L7 BUR OAKS LNG I - qQ _ ` ��ENGLISH OAKS I N� YANDERBILT BEACH RD _ _• _'I,,DERMI T. REAfH RD �p f�r�(��FI1 • a 1 •VLNrURA�I 'III ; ; 'O�yr• IQO= .,� ' u ou� rl ANDOPPA Cl.� GYF• e p SENICIA Cr.SAN PnbLO Cl • iO� • PP r _ Y.. •� .J '9H@OR BiVO • • S o2q` # s 1 AP O OVOSO Cl/ W ' .. 11/ BR�IUGEIW4I / z u LOCATION MAP Labels Drawing Points Drawing Unes Drawing Polygons Drawing Selected Custom Parcels V! Streets MapWLse IV County Boundaries N Parcel Outlines 0 80 120 180 R Copyright 2022 Map Wise. Inc. All rights reserved. www.mapwisacom. This map is informational only. No representation Is made or warranty given as to its content. User assumes all risk of use. MapWise and its suppliers assume no responsibility for any losses resulting from such use. L1 3375 and 3333 VBR RPUD Aerial Location Map Van —��+-..ems•.., �a.a�x,-� 1 Legend PUD BOUNDARY 1. iaRDt._. R 0 0GratlyMinor 150 75 0 150 Feet Chit Engineers • Land 8umeyors • Plannem • Iandseap - lrchllcets Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Site 3375 Site Zone Parcel No 00200240000 Address VANDERBILT Site City NAPLES *Note 34109 *Disclaimer BEACH RD Name / Address 3333/3375 VBR LLC 3838 TAMIAMI TR N STE #402 City NAPLES Map No. Strap No. 31331 000100 017 131331 State FL Section Township Range 31 48 26 Zip 34103-3586 Acres *Estimated 3.91 31 48 26 COMM AT SW CNR SEC 31 ,S89DEG E 991.18FT, NO2DEG W 150.12FT Legal TO POB, NO2DEG W 517. 35FT, S89DEG E 330.09FT, S02 DEG E 517.41FT, N89DEG W 330.3 3 FT TO POB Millage Area O 47 Sub./Condo 100 - ACREAGE HEADER Use Code O 67 - POULTRY, BEES, TROPICAL FISH, RABBITS, E Latest Sales History ;Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book -Page Amount 10/31/22 6188-2782 $ 3,200,000 03/19/14 5022-3210 $ 508,200 04/29/96 2176-915 $ 220,000 06/01/71 401-785 $ 0 Millage Rates o *Calculations School Other Total 4.459 6.0042 10.4632 2022 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change; Land Value $ 977,500 (+) Improved Value $ 224,347 (_) Market Value $ 1,201,847 (-) 10% Cap $ 12,085 (-) Agriculture $ 975,349 (_) Assessed Value $ 214,413 (_) School Taxable Value $ 226,498 (_) Taxable Value $ 214,413 If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Collier County Property Appraiser Property Detail Site 3333 Parcel No 00202280000 Address VANDERBILT Site City NAPLES *Disclaimer BEACH RD Name / Address 3333/3375 VBR LLC 3838 TAMIAMI TRAIL N #402 Site Zone 34109 *Note City NAPLES State FL Zip 34103 Permits (Provided for reference purposes only. *Full Disclaimer. ) Tax Yr Issuer Permit # CO Date Tmp CO Final Bldg Type 0 COUNTY PRBD20180531077 07/26/18 ROOF 0 COUNTY PRBD20180531091 07/26/18 ROOF 0 COUNTY PRBD20190937904 10/04/19 ROOF 1991 COUNTY 90-8652 01/23/91 1992 COUNTY 92-2104 ADDITION 1995 COUNTY 93-16450 05/04/95 SHED 1995 COUNTY 95-7064 POOL 1996 COUNTY 96-5417 10/07/96 GARAGE 2019 COUNTY PRBD20180102004 09/11/18 NO PICKUP 2021 COUNTY PRB020190938537 DECKING, NO PICKUP Land Building/Extra Features # Calc Code Units # Year Description Area Adj 10 ACREAGE 1.93 Built Area 10 1990 RESIDENTIAL 1S68 4427 20 1990 CONC BLK WALL 876 876 30 1990 ALUMENCREEN 1988 1988 40 1994 RESIDENTIAL 864 1210 50 1995 SWIMMING POOL 220 220 60 1995 ALUM CARPORT 400 400 70 1995 CONC BLK WALL 696 696 80 1995 ALUMENCREEN 1816 1816 90 1996 GARAGE 700 1296 100 1995 CONCRETE 344 344 110 1997 ALUMSCREEN1574 1574 Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Site 3333 Parcel No 00202280000 Address VANDERBILT Site City NAPLES *Disclaimer BEACH RD Name / Address 3333/3375 VBR LLC 3838 TAMIAMI TRAIL N #402 City NAPLES Map No. Strap No. 3631 000100 061 31331 State FL Section Township Range 31 48 26 Site Zone 3 *Note4109 Zip 34103 Acres *Estimated 1.93 Legal 31 48 26 E1/2 OF W1/2 OF E1/2 OF S1/2 OF SW1/4 OF SW1/4, LESS S 15OFT Millage Area O 47 Millage Rates O *Calculations Sub./Condo 100 - ACREAGE HEADER School Other Total Use Code O 1 -SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 4.459 6.0042 10.4632 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book -Page Amount 10/28/22 6188-2567 $ 2,600,000 08/05/04 3620-1412 $ 1,700,000 01/10/01 2763-2331 $ 1,400,000 01/10/01 2763-2329 $ 1,400,000 06/01/90 1535-808 $ 70,000 04/01/85 1131-1411 $ 16,000 06/01/75 621-1694 $ 0 2022 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value $ 506,62S (+) Improved Value $ 548,304 (=) Market Value $ 1,OS4,929 (-) 10% Cap $ 209,283 (_) Assessed Value $ 84S,646 (_) School Taxable Value $ 1,054,929 (_) Taxable Value $ 845,646 If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Collier County Property Appraiser Property Detail Site 3375 Site Zone Parcel No 00200240000 Address VANDERBILT Site City NAPLES *Note 34109 *Disclaimer BEACH RD Name / Address 3333/3375 VBR LLC 3838 TAMIAMI TR N STE #402 City NAPLES State FL Zip 34103-3586 Permits (Provided for reference purposes only. *Full Disclaimer. ) Tax Issuer Permit # CO Date Tmp CO Final Bldg Type Yr 1998 COUNTY 9806-597 07/02/98 CARPORT Land Building/Extra Features # Calc Code Units # Year Description Area Adj 10 3.91 Built Area 10 1998 GARAGE 10560 10560 SOIL MAPS COLLIER " OM7TY SOIL -LIGEW = REVISED 1/90 H. Yi4MATAKI SYDRIC $ H 2 HOLOPAW FS, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM 3 NlALABAR F5. H 4 CHOBEE, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM AND DpIM MUCKS -DEPRESSIONAL H 6 RIVIERA:-LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM—COPELAND FS IMMORALEE .7 FS S MYA KA FS 10 _OLDSMAR FS, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM -H 11 HALLANDALE FS 14 PINEDA FS, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM 15 POMELLO FS 16 OLDSMAR FS Ft 17 BASINGER FS H 18 RIVIERA FS, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM - 2 0 FT. DRUM AND "MALA'BAR: - 3K-1 .: FS 21 BOCA FS H H 22 23 CHOBEE, WINDER AND GATOR SOILS, DBPRPSSIONAL HOLOPAW AND H 25 OVA SOILS DEPRESSIONAL BOLA, RIVIERA, LIMESTONE SMSTRATUM _ H AND _COPELAND FS DEPRESSIONAL —. 27 HOLOPAW FS H 28 PINEDA AND RIVIERA FS 29 WARASgO FS H 31 HILOLO LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM, JQpITER AND MARGATE SOILS 32 URBAN L= 33 34 URBAN LAND HOLOPAW BASINGER COMPLEX URBAN LAND IMOKALEE OLDSMAR LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM; COMPLEX - 35 36 URBAN LAND AQUENTS COMPLEX ORGANIC SUBSTRATUM UDORTHENTS SHAPED 37 TuSCAWILLA FS 38 URBAN LAND MATLACHA LIMESTONE SMSTR AT BOCA COMPLEX 39 SATELLITE FS H 40 DURB IN AND WULMMT MUCKS 442 URBAN LAND COMPLEX CANA�IERAL H 43 BSATEI�,2T$ EACHgS ASSOCIATION WINDER, RIV'IRRA; LIMESTONE _ CHOBFE SOILS DEPRESSIONAL SIIBSTRAT AND H 45 48 PAOLA FS (1-8 percent slopes} PENNSUCCO SOIL (marl H 4-9HA�.LANDALE 50 pra�.rie} AND BOCA FS ` (slough) - H S1 OCHOPEE FSL r p OCROPFS FSL$ Fm�r1} H 52 S3 KRSSON MUCK FRBQURNTLY FLOODED - g8TER0 H 54 AND PECKISH SOILS FRisQUII►l'IZY_ FLOODED JUpIT,ER BOCA COMPLEK _ $AS INGER FS, OC:CAS IOLLY FLOODED - 13 .rw1.a�1a� r k� SOILS M -� e. , _�.. i l, Labels Drawing Points Drawing Lines Drawing Polygons Drawing Selected Custom Parcels Streets OSM Hybrid County Boundaries Parcel Outlines Soils Boundaries c 0 120 200 360 ft Copyright 2022 MapWise. Inc. All rights reserved. www.mapwise.com. This map is informational only. No representation is made or warranty given as to its content. User assumes all risk of use. MapWise and its suppliers assume no responsibility for any losses resulting from such use. 'TER PLAN ZONED: PELICAN MARSH DRIIPUD USE: GOLF COURSE I RESIDENTIAL —15' WIDE TYPE'B' LANDSCAPE BUFFER II RESIDENTIAL �I col j m / -m ' WATER / ZONED:BRADFORD ICI MANAGEMENT SQUARE MPUD col RESIDENTIAL USE: ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY q l,nnl �I AMENITY AREA II � I I RESIDENTIAL 15r WIDE TYPED' LANDSCAPE BUFFER VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD I � ZONED: THE VANDERBILT TRUST 1989 CFPUD USE: ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY RESIDENTIAL gyro 'a to �o I�m I In m I - m p 10' FPL EASEMENT (OR 2232, PG 169) I� Ili � I- N o'--sp�da SCALE: 1" =100' vRr�a P�o„®e as M„• LEGEND D. r.� urrW. "�aewuwn.rn. 3375 AND 3333 VBR RPUD G ra dyM i n or "RI,R. P•l a. flW In `Vr'I�M. FlRrIYa 31 iN �wra Civil Fngnearo Lana Survevur> . Plannero I,andatape 4n;IlLLetlx EXHIBIT MR meav dDF2 MASTER PLL AN 1 ZONE: BRADFORD SQUARE MPUD USE: ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY R RESIDENTIAL [f] CJEVIATION ZONED: PELICAN MARSH DRI/PUD USE: GOLF COURSE I RESIDENTIAL ENHANCED 15' WIDE TYPE'B' LANDSCAPE m� oI I POOL m- y1 a mico c c: RESIDENTIL ml n BUILDING rn Lj �— 15 WIDE_TYPE U' -� r L� l LANDSCAPE BUFFER VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD U I:.ael Llinv, Nlt \lNNINUtl' A GradyMinor 4rW,,.Nawr x�a,a.xN.x+. Flu.•m� a+Ias L:Ivll EuuumiA Luxdti•uvc.• Ptmm,•rN Lux Mruur'-irr6ltrltn rY ,.. W. rnnnanl • ina.✓W&In Nbs'i�l ' M1wivw.l�I.,. W,W. W\ ,Ylll IW7IIN vv. f.,•el+,afum,lnW rIn111M'q. r4NNL43N ZONED: THE VANDERBILT TRUST 1929 CFPUD USE: ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY ,, POTENTIAL V EH I C ULAR, PE DES TRIA N INTERCONNF-^i lrAl dIATTSON AT VANLE.R&LT RPUD E%H19T1 C MW: TER ::LAN RE'ASED MAY 30 2023 N Ii a 0, lm SCALE: 1" =° 10D. "ENRo -014iVX I - mler I v— $iTc JUiliivlAfi7 TOTAL SITE AREA: 5.88i ACRES !:ESE:jF;.IT GL ,,,:8± ACRES (aQ0/.1 BUFFERS: 0.40± ACRES (7%) RESIDENT . en n vlsu Ise 4550 enl II TI rlleell v MIAIl l I IRIG Ulh`ii T J r CJiUC.i II.Y!_. IvIYJ\IIVIUivl IJ IVl tli—rmiv:ltl `JVVCLLIVJ OPEN SPACE: REQUIRED: 30% PROVIDED: 30% nnrnrnl ir. IImCrY:- n!'Ru-;/tlAi*OC C• h1ATlfl=vC.—•CTATi.li.ly .cw'. . �i nti.•:�e__ qv rvli-v PROVIDED: 0± ACRES TREE PRESERVATION: REQUIRED: 4.35 TREES (29 EXISTING TREES X 15%) PROVIDED' S TREES DEViA T IONS IEEE FJCI iiBiT E) 1. RELIEF FROM LOG SECTION 4.05.04, TABLE 17, PA :KING SPACE :E eUI{:EF.IENTS FOR MULTI-EAMILY DAfELL;NrG i. THIS PLAN i;S CONCEP i UAL IN WAk I URE i.ND IS SUBJECT i TO kili'MOR MI CIDimri'I :CIIN i::I= i't) AGENCY PERMITTING- 1 RI\EOIVillDl\cLLIYAIC1�InYiTiQ V. MATTSON AT VANDERBILT RPUD .EXHIBIT GradyMinor o. , .vlw...u+w�:YY., r �. �,1, I,,,Y CMASTER PLAN NOTES REVISED MAY 30. 2023IN 02.� IWSIIII :ll9.W1.IIN TVM.4n1ArN/naF. r'nle Y,M I1rynF: LiCne114XIII ENHANCED TYPE 'B' BUFFER PLAN VIEW MAR5ALA OF HT. TIBURON GOLF COURSE 14-22' HT. AREGA PALM 60" HT. SHRUB G ANGPY TREE CABBAGE PALM CLUSTER 50' ON CENTER 45" ON CENTER 25' ON GEN-ER 50' ON CENTER �r ENHANCED 5' TYPE 'B' LAND5GAPE BUFFER 100 LF (TYP.) PRO-05ED DEVELOP"IENT 4 ALI '-aRSA..A 11 100 LF (TYP.) - ENA'gJCL TIPE B 5111E4 ' d BRAGFMp SFGJAR4 � S=.�D4�LCOJ ' RE-RE!^EN C-MUNII. •_ G( I —AGE J ENHANCED TYPE 'B' BUFFER ELEVATION VIEW VAhD-RB LT BEAD RG © GradyMinor sxll, n Pm—� MATTSON AT VANDERBILT RPUD EXHIBIT C '•�'- PrMa SFnwµ.Tlgrtia :H,'H °'TM uao=' CINI EngWrcrx LuuA Sl(YY'YIRM1 MPuurrx LnuAlxvPr ilxitllrl IP MASTER PLAN ENHANCED BUFFER nls �.no .mxwn rwwnln, �mre �n Le",.�i. mn..a., mn�mnw REVISED MAY 30, 2023 -kmM q+linp: amxn.1i :r:.n�a•:n".. �.,. Im Mrru x;'.x xwuaxn FHIS'1 3 M FLUCCS - VEGETATION INVENTORY FLUCCS CODE AND VEGETATION INVENTORY FLUCCS Code - Description Common Name Scientific Name Indicator status 121 Single Family Home This is a single family home with a swimming pool and carport. 250 Specialty Farm Dog Kennel — Horse Stalls Upland This area lacks native habitat. This habitat is primarily cleared with landscape vegetation. Plants such as Queen palms and Carrotwood are examples of planted landscape. There are a few scattered Slash pines, cypress live oaks and cabbage palms. There is no native habitat onsite however there are a few native trees. Slash pine Pinus elliotti UPL Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto FAC Live oak Quercus virginiana FACU Cypress Taxodium spp. OBL Melaleuca Melaleuca quinquenervia Exotic Carrotwood Cupaniopsis anacardioides Exotic Ear leaf acacia Acacia auriculiformis Exotic java plum Syzygium cumin Exotic Brazilian pepper Schinus terehinthifolius Exotic areca palm Dypsis lutescens Exotic queen palm Syagrus romanzoffrana Exotic Guineagrass Panicum maximum FAC_ Bahia grass Paspalum notatum UPL Wedelia Wedelia trilobata Exotic torpedo grass Panicum repens FACW Knotgrass Setaria geniculate FAC Broom sedge Andropogon virginicus FAC- Caesar weed Urena lohata FACU Whitehead broom Spermacoce verticillata FAC Mexican clover Richardia grandiflora Exotic Ragweed Ambrosia artemisiifolia FACU Dog Fennel Eupatorium capillifolium FACU Flat sedge Cyperus ligularis FACW 742 Borrow Area This is a pond with rip -rap shoreline, surrounded by Brazilian pepper. INDICATOR STATUS - Obligate (OBL), Facultative wet plants (FACW), Facultative plants (FAC), Upland (UPL) 0 I P.■wpow � FLUCCS MAP Labels Drawing Points Drawing(y Lines Drawing Polygons Drawing Selectee Custom Parcels Streets OSM Hybrid M1 County Boundaries N Parcel Outlines 0 60 120 18011 Copyright 2022 MapWise. Inc. All rights reserved. www.mapwise.com. This map is informational only. No representation is made or warranty given as to its content. User assumes all risk of use. MapWise and Its suppliers assume no responsibility for any losses resulting from such use. TREE SURVEY ALL VEGETATION TREES ON TIBURON NON-NATIVE ALONG NORTH SIDE '�A: fx, ` (6) PINE 8-10" DBH -4*% L_ N N E '00' s SCALE: 1" = 100, --CLUSTER (6) PINE 10-12" DBH .wo qF POL- 9 O MATTSON AT VANDERBILT TREE SURVEY ® GradvMinor CINI "M eeu . LauA611j9 m PI:IWIPIN . Wudu Npr.lrcltltx•rtN e. e'rNnyureux. rus . HISTORICAL AERIALS r< 1999 AERIAL Write a description for your map, � 7rr i r 1 4 7-1 OAK "Ilk 862 VMDAMM 70 862 • 40*-• J dw 1 1 AERIAL descriptionWrite a i ■ -1-wW 1 'd r 300 ft WELL FIELD ZONES Collier County Well Field Protection Zones 2010 1 Well Field Prolectilm Zones W - I Zone = I Year Travel Time lsoconWur W .2 Zone= 2 Year Travel Time lsowntwr W - 3 Zone z: 5 Year Travel Time Isocomtxir W .4 Zone = 20 Year Travel Tima Isi=rltwr I I I I I I I Mil" 0 2 4 8 CRY w RIdW "TItAdl N w E + s c.fr C.Y Uts c;ixmtY Val ReM Lee Cmnty C.Ilic; county utilities t Ga te WO Fidd Cfty.fNaples E.� G Won GabWNN., WT NK 7�1 Collier County t1fiffi4ms 71- '.1, FI.W Florida (3.t.kA UVwY authomy Gold.., G,u. c, Me FI.W VANDERBILT VBR LISTED SPECIES SURVEY Collier County, Florida JANUARY 2023 Prepared By: Collier Environmental Consultants, Inc. 3211 68'` Street SW Naples, Florida 34105 (239) 263 - 2687 marcoe@prodigy.net Introduction 1 Purpose This survey and report are based on fieldwork performed during January 2023. Required to meet county review requirements, its purpose, is to identify and describe key habitats and report any listed species using the site that would be at risk due to possible future development actions on the site. Site Description The project consists of two parcels totally approximately 4.84 acres. The project site is located in Section 31, Township 48, Range 26; in Collier County, Florida. The parcel is located just east of the intersection of Livingston Road and Vanderbilt Beach Road. The parcels are on the north side of Vanderbilt Beach Road. The east parcel consists of 3.91 acres and was an equestrian center. There are stables, paddocks, round pens everything associated with equine husbandry. The site is entirely cleared of native habitat. There are mostly landscape trees such as queen palms. There are a few live oaks. The west parcel consists of 1.93 acres. This parcel has a dog kennel along Vanderbilt Beach Road, Towards the rear (north) is a single family home with a swimming pool. There is also an excavated area, pond, with riprap along the shore bank. The area is covered with Brazilian pepper. This site is void of native habitat. There are a few scattered Slash pines and cypress. There is a heavy presence of exotic vegetation. The parcels are bordered by residential units along its eastern and western boundaries. Along the southern boundary is Vanderbilt Beach Road. LISTED SPECIES SURVEY: The required survey for a Listed Species Survey calls for a survey covering 100 % of the site, at prescribed transect distances per site acreage. Such a survey was conducted in January 5-6, 2023. Established transects were attempted. Structures prohibit straight transects. The site was examined via straight, and meandering transects with periodic stationary observations. These transects were conducted Early morning (0730 - 1000) and late -day (1500 -1800) time periods. This survey was conducted over two days. All possible species of plants and animals listed by state and federal agencies were noted. Careful observations noting calls, tracks, scat, roosting and nest sites were conducted. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Listed Flora None were seen on site. Refer to Exhibit # 2 - Cumulative Plant List Listed Fauna A description of the wildlife found onsite is provided below. Refer to Exhibit # 3 - Wildlife Species Observed Key Species Discussion Big Cypress Fox Squirrels Big Cypress Fox Squirrels are known to use similar habitat found onsite. Observations were keyed to searching for signs or calls of these animals, such as leaf nests in canopy trees or the distinctive chattering of territorial squirrels. No individuals were observed during this study. Bald Eagle A search of Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission nest locator shows no nest nearby. Florida Black Bear No individuals were observed during this survey even though Black bears are known to inhabit the general area. Special attention was given for signs such as scraps, tracks and scat. This mammal has a large home range and is known to inhabit the area. Bonneted Bat The Florida bonneted bat is the largest species of bat in Florida. Previously known as the Florida (Wagner's) mastiff bats these bats were reclassified as a separate species unique to Florida. The species can grow to a length of 6.5 inches with a wingspan of 20 inches. This is a flying mammal free to traverse great distances. The parcel lacks trees with potential cavities. No individuals and/or guano were seen. This project is not anticipated to negatively impact the species. Florida Panther No individuals have been documented utilizing this project site or identified during this survey. This species does have a large home range and is known to inhabit surrounding areas. The site is not in the Panther Consultation Area. Gopher Tortoise No Gopher tortoise burrows were located/identified on site. Conclusions Transects were walked on both parcels. Other transects were primarily meandering and stationary observation were also employed. This parcel has very limiting factors for any wildlife utilization. This parcel is void of native habitat and is in the urban area. The parcel is bordered by a busy roadway along its southern boundary and development along its eastern and western boundary. Wildlife observation was very limited. The main vertebrates encountered were a few birds. Vertebrates - Threatened, Endangered and „Species of Special ,Concern Species Present Absent Black bear x Florida panther x Everglades mink x Big Cypress Fox squirrel x Bonneted Bat x Indigo snake x American alligator x Gopher tortoise X Gopher Frog x Southeastern American kestrel x Red -Cockaded woodpecker x Florida Scrub Jay X Wood stork X Snail kite x Bald eagle x Limpkin Osprey White ibis Tricolored heron Snowy egret Reddish egret Little blue heron Listed Vesetation Tillandsia spp. x Potential len A�.na Ro��•, I� T uce Click al -"` — Shady OaYS Lane - i Ro rY Beo• Jc .I � �. . I t�td�Pt paO° G'r° IRnAve �ue hl^�,I All IOIh'Avenu, Northwest v: N \ t I' _ I f•� fs r v Wns�° � e V darhpt 0exlc Road - ^ - --- Vanderblll Beach Roatl eBYMB -� .aula•Y Y v� �� F o o GIOid ., yy 1•\ "-e • ^w vC ; �B < C.. t ` c� Pd10 :.OUrt C G • fie.. o hIJ B3Y .. a :,- -..• ♦ c �: IndsonO Court.r f Lane �' U � 7$ o�' � .-♦— a � - �S EI Sc9ury„(„ A O c.-. S�.Lft CIbuB� Orin»'o"od'N^Y �� ♦ ♦jw Vintage Roserve Cook it .tt •. o h n .,a Yl 1 I _� �, Iler �,� tl _f _ � 0 � _ • i" p 1`I L1 H.i\leis Hnad "Tito �►r ^ c fi4 �� IN t I11. ,e 2022 LOCATION MAP A ('l r Labels Drawing Points Drawing Lines Drawing Polygons Drawing Selected Custom Parcels Streets MapWlse County Boundaries N Parcel Outlines IL —,A det .!a%. r1r1 - 1a�i t.! 1-1_1141 j 1 f_Ifl 'tChr('' bft. --) 0 240 480 7208 Copyright 2022 Map Wise. Inc. All rights reserved. 1Anww.mapwise.c0m. This map is informational only. No representation is made or warranty given as to Its content. User assumes all risk of use. MapWise and its suppliers assume no responsibility for any lasses resulting from such use. LOCATION Labels Drawing Poles Drawing N Lines Drawing Polygons Drawing Selected Custom Parcels Streets OSM Hybrid A County Boundaries IV Parcel Outflnes 0 59 118 177 It Copyright 2022 MapWise. Inc. All rights reserved. www.mapwise.com. This map is informational only. No representation is made or warranty given as to its content. User assumes all risk of use. Map Wise and its suppliers assume no responsibility for any losses resulting from such use. FLUCCS CODE AND VEGETATION INVENTORY FLUCCS Code - Description Common Name Scientific Name Indicator status 12t Single Family Home This is a single family home with a swimming pool and carport. 250 Specialty Farm Dog Kennel — Horse Stalls Upland This area lacks native habitat. This habitat is primarily cleared with landscape vegetation. Plants such as Queen palms and Carrotwood are examples of planted landscape. There are a few scattered Slash pines, cypress live oaks and cabbage palms. There is no native habitat onsite however there are a few native trees. Slash pine Pinus elliotti UPL Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto FAC Live oak Quercus virginiana FACU Cypress Taxodium spp. OBL Melaleuca Melaleuca gvinquenervia Exotic Carrotwood Cupaniopsis anacardioides Exotic Ear leaf acacia Acacia auriculiformis Exotic Java plum Syzygium cumini Exotic Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolius Exotic areca palm Dypsis lutescens Exotic queen palm Syagrus romanzoffiana Exotic Guineagrass Panicum maximum FAC- Bahia grass Paspalum notatum UPL Wedelia Wedelia trilohata Exotic torpedo grass Panicum repens FACW Knotgrass Setaria geniculate FAC Broom sedge Andropogon virginicus FAC- Caesar weed Urena lobata FACU Whitehead broom Spermacoce verticillata FAC Mexican clover Richardia grandiflora Exotic Ragweed Ambrosia artemisiifolia FACU Dog Fennel Eupatorium capillifolium FACU Flat sedge Cyperus ligularis FACW 742 Borrow Area This is a pond with rip -rap shoreline, surrounded by Brazilian pepper. INDICATOR STATUS - Obligate (OBL), Facultative wet plants (FACW), Facultative plants (FAC), Upland (UPL) RAK� 1 1 F L U C C S MAP Labels Drawing Points Drawing IN Lines Drawing Potygen5 Drawing Selected Custom Parcels Streets OSM Hybrid - County Boundaries N Parcel Outlines 0 e0 120 1808 Copyright 2022 Map Wise. Inc. All rights reserved, www.mapwise.Com. This map is informational only. No representation is made or warranty given as to its content. user assumes all risk of use. MapWise and its suppliers assume no responsibility for any losses resulting from such use. WILDLIFE SPECIES OBSERVED Common Name Amphibian & Reptiies: Brown anole Birds: Dove- mourning mockingbird Vultue, Black Bluej ay Cardinal Cattle egret Species Anolis sagfei Zenaida macroura N imus pol lvg ottos Coragyns atratus Cyanocitta cristata Richmondena cardinalis Bubulcus ibis Status Observation Sight Sight Sight Sight Call/Sight Call Sight BLACK BEAR CALLS R rR R Ir 1� R R ! !R R r PanR R r/R rF RR R /Ir _ .. R R 1� f �.� R I� - OR, ww R R R R Ir R 1� r R ^R R R /T IeF• R rIr R R R R R er R 1� ► i R t PR ► ra• 1e11r` R R R R R R �! R R R m f R IR u/�R R - R f _ R R R R� R rr R - f /- R R•t!'� R R mw drr 1► /r R Ir / R R �R � or f R rr III �, ''1- I R trrr' ra• R /rr f AR R R R V Ier R R ra R - iM3 •: nw ;,r I 1/19/2023, 2:41:36 PM 1:36,112 0 0.28 0.55 1.1 mi Black Bear Calls 0 0.42 0.85 1.7 km Fonda Fish an! W.Uffa Cmserva6on Commissim-Fish antl W Me Research InstAute. Universey d Saulh Fb da. Courtly d Collier. Esn, HERE. TRGIS User Declaimer: This graphical r sentabon a provieea for efdmetionel WrPosea and sh W nd be cansieereC asllgrM "for navigatO 91. engineering. Iegal, and olhc uses. Black Bear Calls :IN-0000247463 Locale City Naples County Collier Region South Report Date 3/5/2C16, 7:00 PM Address 14253 Livingston Road IncidentlD IN-0000241453 BMU South; ZipCode 34" 19 Latitude 26.24 Longitude -81.73 CaliNature In Area Trad(Nu m Black Bear Calls :IN-0000333149 Locale City Naples County Collier Region South Report Date 6/2512018. 8:00 PM Address 9498 Wilshir® Lakes Eg;ulevard IncidentlD IN-3CC,03331-19 BMU South; ZipCode 34' C9 Latitude 2&24 Longitude -81.74 CalINature In Area TrackNum Black Bear Calls :IN-0000333506 Locale OTHER City NAPLES County ColliE'r Region South Report Date 6/29/2018, 8:00 PM Address 14501 MARSALA WAY IncidentlD IN-0000333506 BMU South zipcode 34'09 Latitude 26.25 Longitude -81.75 CallNature Threatened Human TrackNum Black Bear Calls :37108 Locale City Naples County COWEr Region South Report Date 6/6/2C1 1, 8:00 PM Address Lowbank Dr & Wilshire Laces N IncidentlD 37'08 BMU South ZipCode 34'C9 Latitude 26.25 Longitude -81 74 CallNature In Area TrackNum Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict (PL20220001010) Exhibit V.D Growth Management The small-scale growth management plan amendment proposes to establish a new infill subdistrict which would permit up to 150 multi -family rental dwelling units on the 5.88+/- acre property. The applicant has committed that 11.3% of the dwelling units constructed will be income restricted and rented to individuals or families earning less than 80% of the Collier County AMI and 11.3% of the dwelling units constructed will be income restricted and rented to individuals or families earning less than 100% of the Collier County AMI. The small-scale amendment is necessary in order to develop the property at a density that provides an economic incentive to the developer to provide 22.6% of the units constructed as affordable rental units. Under, Chapter 163 of the Florida Statutes, local governments may adopt small-scale amendments to their Growth Management Plans if the amendment impacts fewer than 50 acres. The proposed new sub -district consists of approximately 5.88+/- acres and is; therefore, eligible to seek the proposed small-scale amendment. A companion PUD rezoning application has been filed with Collier County. Chapter 163.3167 Scope of act.— (9) Each local government shall address in its comprehensive plan, as enumerated in this chapter, the water supply sources necessary to meet and achieve the existing and projected water use demand for the established planning period, considering the applicable plan developed pursuant to s. 373.709. The project will be provided potable water and sewer service by Collier County Water Sewer District. No capacity issues exist or are anticipated in the service area. Chapter 163.3177 (6) (a) 2. The future land use plan and plan amendments shall be based upon surveys, studies, and data regarding the area, as applicable, including: a. The amount of land required to accommodate anticipated growth. b. The projected permanent and seasonal population of the area. c. The character of undeveloped land. d. The availability of water supplies, public facilities, and services. e. The need for redevelopment, including the renewal of blighted areas and the elimination of nonconforming uses which are inconsistent with the character of the community. f. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to or closely proximate to military installations. June 7, 2023 W GradyMinor Page 1 of 4 m Exhibit VD Growth Manageent-rl.docx C€vlI Enginccrs • band Svrvcyors • 111anncrs • Landscapc Architccts Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134 • 239-947-1144 • engineering@gradyminor.com • www.gradyminor.com g. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to an airport as defined in s. 330.35 and consistent with s. 333.02. h. The discouragement of urban sprawl. i. The need for job creation, capital investment, and economic development that will strengthen and diversify the community's economy. j. The need to modify land uses and development patterns within antiquated subdivisions. Chapter 163.3177 8. Future land use map amendments shall be based upon the following analyses: a. An analysis of the availability of facilities and services. b. An analysis of the suitability of the plan amendment for its proposed use considering the character of the undeveloped land, soils, topography, natural resources, and historic resources on site. c. An analysis of the minimum amount of land needed to achieve the goals and requirements of this section. The Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict is consistent with Chapter 163.3177, F.S. The subdistrict includes all available land of a size adequate to support a residential project. 163.3184 Process for adoption of comprehensive plan or plan amendment. The proposed amendment is consistent with Chapter 163.3184, F.S which establishes the criteria for small-scale comprehensive plan amendments to a growth management plan. 163.3187 Process for adoption of small scale comprehensive plan amendment.— (1) A small scale development amendment maybe adopted under the following conditions: (a) The proposed amendment involves a use of 50 acres or fewer and: (b) The proposed amendment does not involve a text change to the goals, policies, and objectives of the local government's comprehensive plan, but only proposes a land use change to the future land use map for a site -specific small scale development activity. However, text changes that relate directly to, and are adopted simultaneously with, the small scale future land use map amendment shall be permissible under this section. (c) The property that is the subject of the proposed amendment is not located within an area of critical state concern, unless the project subject to the proposed amendment involves the construction of affordable housing units meeting the criteria of s. 420.0004(3), and is located within an area of critical state concern designated by s. 380.0552 or by the Administration Commission pursuant to s. 380.05(1). The proposed amendment involves the use of less than 50 acres, the proposed amendment includes a map amendment and associated text relating directly to the map amendment, and the property is not located within an area of critical state concern. No State or regional impacts are associated with the proposed amendment. June 7, 2023 Page 2 of 4 Exhibit VD Growth Management-rl.docx Project Justification Future Land Use Element: The 5.88± acre project is designated Urban Designation, Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict on the Future Land Use Map. The small-scale growth management plan amendment proposes to establish a new infill subdistrict which would permit up to 150 multi -family rental dwelling units on the 5.88+/- acre property. The applicant has committed that 11.3% of the dwelling units constructed will be income restricted and rented to individuals or families earning less than 80% of the Collier County AMI and 11.3% of the dwelling units constructed will be income restricted and rented to individuals or families earning less than 100% of the Collier County AMI. The small-scale amendment is necessary in order to develop the property at a density that provides an economic incentive to the developer to provide 30% of the units constructed as affordable rental units. Both Collier County and the Urban Land Institute have conducted analyses of the demand for additional affordable housing in Collier County. The studies have concluded that additional housing meeting affordable housing guidelines are needed in Collier County. Policy 5.9: Encourage recognition of identifiable communities within the urbanized area of western Collier County. Presentation of economic and demographic data shall be based on Planning Communities and commonly recognized neighborhoods. Transportation Element: Policy 5.1 requires that all projects are evaluated to determine their effect on the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR. The TIS prepared in support of this small-scale amendment application concludes that no level of service issues will arise from development of the proposed 150 rental units. Public Facilities Element: The property is served by potable water and sanitary sewer services. Water and sewer service will be provided by Collier County Water Sewer District. No capacity issues have been identified or are anticipated in the future. Conservation and Coastal Management Element: Policy 6.1.2 requires that developments in the Urban area must retain a minimum of 25% of existing native vegetation on -site. The site has been largely cleared in support of the former June 7, 2023 Page 3 of 4 Exhibit VD Growth Management-rl.docx equestrian training facility and existing animal hospital and only scattered native trees remain on -site. Some tree clusters exist and 25% of the trees to be retained will be identified as part of the companion PUD application. Objective 6.2 and implementing policies protect and conserve wetlands and natural functions of wetlands. The vegetative mapping provided in the Environmental Assessment identifies no wetlands on the site. Objective 7.1: Direct incompatible land uses away from listed animal species and their habitats. The availability of suitable habitat for any vertebrate is quite limited. The parcel is cleared and does not provide potential for any denning, habitation and /or foraging. The parcel is also surrounded by development. The parcel was traversed and examined. Potential species for such a small parcel would be fox squirrels and/or gopher tortoises. At the time of inspection, no burrows and/or small animals were encountered. The project site does provide some foraging for traversing birds. A Black Bear management plan may be required at the time of SDP. Please also refer to the listed species management and indigenous preservation plans prepared by Collier Environmental Consultants, Inc. June 7, 2023 Page 4 of 4 Exhibit VD Growth Management-rl.docx Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict (PL20220001010) Exhibit V.D1 Needs Analysis and Market Study Summary of Market Rates: Property 1-Bedroom 2-Bedroom 3-Bedroom Orchid Run 2,307 2,936 3,323 La go 2,487 3,149 3,682 Mark Lane 2,390 3,132 3,895 Inspira 2,326 2,904 3,346 Magnolia Square 2,567 3,551 4,588 Allura 2,164 3,063 3.309 Pearl Founders Square 2,537 3r407 4r302 Average Market Rent* 2,414 $ .3,136 $ 3,803 *w-_iffnt-2d awerage July 20, 2023 w GradyMinor Civil E Rgfneem • Land Surveyors • Plan ncrs • Landscape Architects Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134 • 239-947-1] 44 • engineering@gradyminor.com • www.gradyminor.com Collier County Florida January 29—February 3, 2017 9 Urban Land Institute Collier County Florida Expanding Housing Affordability January 29—February 3, 2017 Urban Land Insiitule About the Urban Land Institute THE URBAN LAND INSTITUTE is a global, member - driven organization comprising more than 40,000 real estate and urban development professionals dedicated to advancing the Institute's mission of providing leadership in the responsible use of land and creating and sustaining thriving communities worldwide. ULI's interdisciplinary membership represents all aspects of the industry, including developers, property owners, investors, architects, urban planners, public officials, real estate brokers, appraisers, attorneys, engineers, finan- ciers, and academics. Established in 1936, the Institute has a presence in the Americas, Europe, and Asia Pacific regions, with members in 76 countries. The extraordinary impact that ULI makes on land use deci- sion making is based on its members sharing expertise on a variety of factors affecting the built environment, includ- ing urbanization, demographic and population changes, new economic drivers, technology advancements, and environmental concerns. Peer -to -peer learning is achieved through the knowledge shared by members at thousands of convenings each year that reinforce ULI's position as a global authority on land use and real estate. In 2016 alone, more than 3,200 events were held in 340 cities around the world. Drawing on the work of its members, the Institute recog- nizes and shares best practices in urban design and devel- opment for the benefit of communities around the globe. More information is available at uli.org. Follow ULI on Twit- ter, Facebook, Linkedln, and Instagram. Cover photos: Wilhelm Rosenkranz (top); Beth Silverman (bottom). © 2017 by the Urban Land Institute 2001 L Street, NW Suite 200 Washington, DC 20036-4948 All rights reserved. Reproduction or use of the whole or any part of the contents without written permission of the copy- right holder is prohibited. 2 A ULI Advisory Services Panel Report About ULI Advisory Services THE GOAL OF THE ULI ADVISORY SERVICES pro- gram is to bring the finest expertise in the real estate field to bear on complex land use planning and development projects, programs, and policies. Since 1947, this program has assembled well over 600 ULI-member teams to help sponsors find creative, practical solutions for issues such as downtown redevelopment, land management strate- gies, evaluation of development potential, growth manage- ment, community revitalization, brownfield redevelopment, military base reuse, provision of low-cost and affordable housing, and asset management strategies, among other matters. A wide variety of public, private, and nonprofit or- ganizations have contracted for ULI's advisory services. Each panel team is composed of highly qualified profes- sionals who volunteer their time to ULI. They are chosen for their knowledge of the panel topic and are screened to ensure their objectivity. ULI's interdisciplinary panel teams provide a holistic look at development problems. A respected ULI member who has previous panel experience chairs each panel. The agenda for a five-day panel assignment is intensive. It includes an in-depth briefing day composed of a tour of the site and meetings with sponsor representatives, a day of hour-long interviews of typically 50 to 100 key community representatives, and two days of formulating recommendations. Long nights of discussion precede the panel's conclusions. On the final day on site, the panel makes an oral presentation of its findings and conclusions to the sponsor. A written report is prepared and published. Because the sponsoring entities are responsible for significant preparation before the panel's visit, including sending extensive briefing materials to each member and arranging for the panel to meet with key local community members and stakeholders in the project under consider- ation, participants in ULI's five-day panel assignments are able to make accurate assessments of a sponsor's issues and to provide recommendations in a compressed amount of time. A major strength of the program is ULI's unique ability to draw on the knowledge and expertise of its members, including land developers and owners, public officials, academics, representatives of financial institutions, and others. In fulfillment of the mission of the Urban Land Institute, this Advisory Services panel report is intended to provide objective advice that will promote the responsible use of land to enhance the environment. ULI Program Staff Thomas W. Eitler Senior Vice President, Advisory Services Beth Silverman Senior Director, Advisory Services Paul Angelone Director, Advisory Services Steven Gu Associate, Advisory Services James A. Mulligan Senior Editor David James Rose Editor/Manager Sara Proehl, Publications Professionals LLC Manuscript Editor Betsy Van Buskirk Creative Director Deanna Pineda, Muse Advertising Design Graphic Designer Craig Chapman Senior Director, Publishing Operations Collier County, Florida, January 29—February 3, 2017 3 Acknowledgments ON BEHALF OF THE URBAN LAND INSTITUTE, the panel would like to thank our sponsors, the Board of Coun- ty Commissioners of Collier County —Penny Taylor, Donna Fiala, Andy Solis, Burt L. Saunders, and William L. McDan- iel Jr. The panel would also like to thank the city of Naples, the city of Marco Island, Everglades City, the Collier County Affordable Housing Advisory Committee, and the Commu- nity Housing Plan Stakeholders Committee for inviting the panel to examine housing affordability challenges in the county, and it thanks the community at large for being so warm and welcoming. Special appreciation goes to Kimberly Grant, director of Community and Housing Services; Cormac Giblin, Grants and Housing Development manager; Steve Carnell, head of Public Services; County Manager Leo Ochs; and the rest of the county staff members for the time and effort they have devoted to the project. In addition, the panel expresses its appreciation to Steve Hruby, Nick Kouloheras, and the other members of the affordable housing committee for their assistance and support throughout the engagement. The panel also thanks ULI Southwest Florida, which will continue to be a local resource for Collier County moving forward. Finally, the panel would like to thank the approximately 90 residents, business and community leaders, and repre- sentatives from the Greater Collier County community who shared their perspectives and insights during the panel's stakeholder interviews. 4 A ULI Advisory Services Panel Report Contents ULIPanel and Project Staff...............................................................................................................................6 Background and the Panel's Assignment..........................................................................................................7 Study Area and Surrounding Context.................................................................................................................9 CurrentConditions........................................................................................................................................11 Vision: What Do You Want to Be When You Grow Up?.....................................................................................17 Implementation.............................................................................................................................................. 20 Conclusion....................................................................................................................................................37 Appendix A: Implementation Schedule............................................................................................................38 Appendix B: Examples of County Housing Initiatives.........................................................................................39 Appendix C: City of Austin, 2014 Robert C. Larson Policy Leadership Award Winner.........................................40 Aboutthe Panel.............................................................................................................................................43 Collier County, Florida, January 29—February 3, 2017 5 ULl Panel and Project Staff Panel Chair Philip Payne Principal and Chief Executive Officer Ginkgo Residential Charlotte, North Carolina Panel Members Hilary Chapman Housing Program Manager Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments Washington, D.C. Ian Colgan Assistant Executive Director Oklahoma City Housing Authority Oklahoma City, Oklahoma Joanne Fiebe Florida Center for Community Design and Research School of Architecture and Community Design, University of South Florida Tampa, Florida Lacy McManus Director of Program Development Greater New Orleans Inc. New Orleans, Louisiana John Orfield Principal BOKA Powell Dallas, Texas Cassie Wright Project Manager Urban Ventures LLC Denver, Colorado ULI Project Staff Beth Silverman Senior Director, Advisory Services Steven Gu Associate, Advisory Services 6 A ULI Advisory Services Panel Report Background and the Panel's Assignment COLLIER COUNTY HAS BEEN DESCRIBED as "unique" and "one of the most beautiful places in the world." Although the community is unique, the issue of housing affordability is not. In fact, virtually every commu- nity in the nation is, to some degree, struggling with this issue. It is especially true in retirement and resort commu- nities, which have significant numbers of service workers and high real estate values. The issue of housing affordability is not new. The panel is impressed with the time, the effort, and the quality of work that has been invested in this subject by the commission- ers and Collier County staff. Many of the panel's recom- mendations mirror and ratify the work that has already been done. From the panel's perspective, the real need in Collier County is for action and implementation. This implementa- tion will require political will and leadership. In addition, the community at large will need to prepare for and adapt to the growth that is certain to occur in the county. Not all of the panel's recommendations will be popular within the community at large, but the panel believes such recom- mendations are essential to the long-term viability and sustainability of Collier County. An integral part of this strategic vision will be developing a plan that ensures that affordable housing will be available to all of the county's citizens. The Panel's Assignment There is no question that Collier County has a housing affordability problem. The highly desirable area is home to millionaires and billionaires from around the world. The county also has a sizable second -home retirement com- munity. Like many affluent resort communities across the United States, those influences have created a develop- ment pattern that caters to select segments of the com- munity. The local economy is focused on retail, hospitality, services, and agriculture; however, high housing costs have priced out much of the workforce needed for the county to function. As a result, large numbers of employ- ees are commuting long distances to and from work, and employers are having an increasingly difficult time recruit- ing and retaining workers. Community leaders are seeking strategic recommendations on how to address the issues surrounding housing affordability in Collier County. In March 2015 and again in March 2016, the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) held an affordable housing workshop. The BCC has also received several recommen- dations for programs and incentives to address housing affordability in Collier County, including establishing an affordable housing trust fund, providing even greater density incentives to support affordable housing develop- ment, and providing inclusionary zoning with pay -in -lieu -of options. The larger Collier County community has come Although Collier County is the site of multimillion -dollar homes, it faces a significant housing affordability problem. Part of the challenge stems from a significant lack of supply in terms of housing type and level of affordability throughout the county. Collier County, Florida, January 29—February 3, 2017 7 together around this issue. In October 2015, the United Way sponsored a community -wide forum about affordable housing. The Greater Naples Chamber of Commerce's Board of Directors has also established a work group to address this issue. Collier County has invited the ULI Advisory Services panel to help the county develop a community -wide approach to address housing affordability issues. Collier County has asked the panel to focus on the follow- ing key questions: ■ Why is it important for the county to have a balanced supply of housing, in terms of type, tenure, attainability, access, and distribution? ■ According to key stakeholders, including residents, what are the major obstacles to producing and sustaining affordable housing and workforce housing in Collier County? What can be done to mitigate those obstacles? ■ What are the stakeholders' perceptions of affordable and workforce housing and of the existing tools and programs in place to support it? What are stakeholders' recommendations for change? ■ How can public policy encourage the redevelopment of underused areas of the developed coastal area that includes affordable and workforce housing while ensur- ing that such housing will also be a component of new development in the urban and rural fringe areas. ■ What policies, strategies, and best practices have worked in places similar to Collier County that the panel Collier Co .,_ MIA. Collier County circa 1930-1945. would recommend that the county implement as it produces affordable housing units in the county's urban and rural areas? Summary of the Panel's Recommendations It was evident to the panel during its interviews with com- munity stakeholders; its review of comments compiled from a countywide, online, public survey; and its multiple study tours throughout Collier County that much work has already been done to address housing affordability chal- lenges. The panel hopes this report not only will serve as a blueprint for implementation, but also will help solidify an ongoing strategy to meet the county's spectrum of housing affordability needs. With such goals in mind, the panel's primary recommendations include the following: ■ Create a vision for the future of the community. ■ Recognize that housing affordability affects all segments of the community. ■ Increase the county's supply of affordable housing (in- cluding rental housing) by adding to the current supply and by maintaining existing affordable units. ■ Adopt a smart code that distinguishes between the urban and rural parts of the county. ■ Reactivate the Affordable Housing Trust Fund —and use it. ■ Recognize that transportation is part of the housing affordability solution. Develop solutions that link housing with access to transportation options. ■ Establish transportation corridors to target mixed - income, multifamily housing development. ■ Consider establishing an enhanced minimum -wage ordinance. ■ Raise public awareness, educate, and communicate with the community about housing affordability. 8 A ULI Advisory Services Panel Report Study Area and Surrounding Context LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST END of the Florida peninsula, Collier County is the largest county by land area in the state. The county contains a variety of differ- ent communities including the city of Naples, inland Im- mokalee, and Marco Island, as well as four large nationally protected environmental areas. According to the 2010 census, the population breaks down to 65.7 percent non - Hispanic whites, 25.9 percent Latino, 6.6 percent African American, and 1.1 percent Asian. This diverse community, both geographically and ethnically, makes Collier County unique when compared with similar tourist destinations. However, this diversity has also led to housing issues throughout the county. Key Focus Areas Although the county was examined at large, the panel was asked to focus on the following key areas: ■ The city of Naples is an incorporated municipality bordering the Gulf of Mexico on the west and the unincorporated Collier County urban area on the east. Naples measures just 14 square miles and has some of the highest housing costs in the country. The limited number of commercial areas consists primarily of retail centers and financial institutions. ■ The urban area is located between the city of Naples and the rural lands (which run from the coast to about ten miles inland). Most of the housing, commercial, re- tail, and other services are located and permitted in this area. The urban area is characterized by large, planned, gated communities and by strip -mall developments. ■ The rural lands and the Estates area are located between the urban area and the more environmentally sensitive areas to the east. The Estates area is largely composed of platted, subdivided lots that range from Charlotte Har4arr FOV HEND4391le, ila West Palm Beach "'�� PALM BF�1 Cape — I B ynton lea h LEE alee I- 44,E -L--� rgat Naples ort Lauderdale � C O L I E R BBowABD rI ti OIIyWOOd 41 Big Cypress — N PRES GULF \.\ I Tamia lams OF OE I DADS BiscdyneNP MEXICO whitewaterBaH+este d �l ATLANTIC L E lades NP OCEAN FLORID�Q BAY! " 1 Key West. ' Located in southwest Florida, Collier County is the largest county by land area in the state. Collier County Florida Urban ` area City of j >r: Immokalee area ti � _ - ,- - _ - Rural lands/Estates area iirti+mr=-- ILI The panel's study area encompasses the entire county. However, key focus areas within the study include the city of Naples, the urban area, the rural lands, the Estates area, and the Immokalee area. Collier County, Florida, January 29-February 3, 2017 9 about one acre to more than 20 acres. During the Florida Land Grab of the 1950s, land parcels were divided and sold, creating the largest subdivision in the world with tens of thousands of home sites. Designated as privately owned, single-family lots, the Estates area's commercial and retail opportunities are limited. West of the Estates are the rural lands, which are primarily farmland and environmentally sensitive areas that are designated for future cities and towns. The first town to be built in this area is Ave Maria. Once the project is built out, it will have up to 11,000 residences and 1.7 million square feet of retail, office, and business park uses spread across its 4,000 acres. Ave Maria is located at the intersection of Oil Well Road and Camp Keals Road in eastern Collier County. The main entrance —on Oil Well just west of Camp Keals—leads to the town center. ■ The Immokalee area is an agricultural center of the county. It is located in the northeast section of the county and is characterized by residential, commercial, and industrial development. A significant percentage of the affordable housing units available in Collier County are located in the Immokalee area. Habitat for Humanity development projects, such as Carson Lakes and Faith Landing, are built here, as are other affordable housing developments, including Hatcher's Preserve. 10 A ULI Advisory Services Panel Report Current Conditions AFFORDABLE HOUSING HAS MANY definitions and perceptions. Oftentimes, the multitude of definitions and opinions creates confusion when people are attempting to both study and solve issues of housing affordability in any given community or geography. Many definitions of afford- able housing refer to a percentage of area median income (AMI) as defined by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Other definitions are careful to delineate between "affordable" and "workforce" housing — often defined as above or below 80 percent of AMI. Regard- less of the definition used in the affordable housing industry, for most people what represents "affordable" is more of a gut feeling that is influenced by their daily context. Throughout the study process, the panel consistently heard about Collier County's housing affordability problem. However, the panel also perceived that there is a lack of clarity and agreement about the definition of affordable ENVrYiQW NG [SEA LOPMENT F 0- N. What Is Affordable Housing? The Center for Urban Pedagogy, a New York City nonprofit organization dedicated to using the power of design and art to increase meaningful civic engagement, created the guidebook What Is Affordable Housing? with pictures and diagrams to help explain affordable housing issues in New York City. housing, which is causing poor communication, misunder- standings, and misaligned goals relative to the topic. Ac- cordingly, the panel recommends reframing the terminology of housing affordability around the concept of cost burden. Reframing the Idea of Housing Affordability HUD defines "cost burdened" as the following: Families who pay more than 30 percent of their gross income on housing costs, which includes mortgage principal and interest, property tax, and homeowners insurance payments. Other definitions add other housing costs, such as utilities, condominium or homeowners association fees, and ongo- ing maintenance or repairs, but the overall concept is that if a household is paying more than 30 percent of its gross income toward housing, then that is a concern, and from a policy standpoint, such cost may need to be addressed. The advantage of using the cost -burden terminology is that it does not put the focus on income alone; instead, it examines income as compared to housing cost. Therefore, it has a localized outcome that recognizes the different housing markets that exist nationally, regionally, and even within a single city or county. The 30 percent cost -burden threshold has been around for several decades. The idea was originally established by the 1937 National Housing Act, which also created the public housing program. At that time, eligibility to live in public housing was based on income limits, rather than maximum rents; a tenant's income could not exceed five to six times the rent. Since the late 1930s, the 30 percent income limit for rental housing has been reevaluated and Collier County, Florida, January 29—February 3, 2017 11 Glossary of Housing Affordability Terms Affordable housing: Generally, a home or apartment occupied by a household that pays 30 percent or less of its gross income toward its mortgage or rent. The term is also widely used to refer to housing that is subsidized or rent -regulated and that is occupied by a household that is "low-income" (see later). The term used in this manner can be limiting —there are growing numbers of households that are within a range of incomes, that live in unsubsidized or unregulated market -rate housing, and that have a problem with "housing affordability" (see later). Area median income (AMI): The median household income of each metropolitan statistical area (MSA) adjusted for family size. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) publishes AMIs annually. AMI is used to determine the eligibility of applicants for most housing assistance programs. Extremely low-income housing: Per federal regulations, a household whose income does not exceed the higher of the federal poverty level or 30 percent of AMI (see earlier). Housing affordability: Refers to the ability or the lack thereof of a household to meet its housing expenses with a reasonable and sustainable share of its income, generally spending no more than 30 percent of gross income on housing costs, without regard to the household's income or whether the household lives in subsidized, rent -regulated, or market -rate housing. Housing cost burden: Per the federal government, refers to a household having to pay more than 30 percent of its income for housing and possibly having difficulty affording other necessities such as food, clothing, transportation, and medical care. A housing cost burden is "severe" if housing costs consume more than 50 percent of a household's income. Low-income housing: Per federal regulations, a household whose income does not exceed 80 percent of AMI (see earlier), adjusted for family size. Mixed -income housing: "Mixed -income" has a twofold meaning. In accordance with federal housing policy, HUD defines a mixed -income building as "comprised of housing units with differing levels of affordability, typically with some market -rate housing and some housing that is available to low-income occupants below market -rate" In accordance with widely held housing industry practice, a mixed -income neighborhood consists of a variety of household incomes and opportunities for meaningful interaction, including parks, schools, and shopping. Moderate -income housing: Per federal regulations, households whose incomes are between 81 percent and 95 percent of AMI. The government may establish income ceilings higher or lower than 95 percent of AMI on the basis of an analysis of prevailing levels of construction costs, fair market rents, or unusually high or low family incomes. Naturally occurring affordable housing: Generally, housing that is "affordable" to "low-income" and "moderate -income" (see earlier) households that is not currently federally subsidized or rent -regulated. Preservation: Generally, providing the necessary physical improvements and financial capital to enable a currently occupied rental property to remain "affordable" (see earlier) and in decent condition for a sustained period of time. Preservation programs can also target owner -occupied housing, thereby providing assistance to homeowners that allows them to make improvements to their homes and to remain in them. Public housing: Rental housing owned and operated by local housing authorities that primarily serves "extremely low-income" (see earlier) households. Roughly 2.6 million people live in the nation's 1.1 million public housing units. Very few public housing units have been built in recent years. Supportive housing: Generally, "affordable housing" (see earlier) combined with social services to assist vulnerable populations, such as the homeless, the disabled, the addicted, and the elderly. Very low-income housing: Per federal regulations, a household whose income does not exceed 50 percent of AMI (see earlier), adjusted for family size. Workforce housing: Generally, housing that is "affordable" (see earlier) to households earning between 60 and 120 percent of AMI (see earlier). In high -cost areas, incomes may be as high as 150 percent of AMI. Some definitions exclude owner -occupied housing. Source: ULI Terwilliger Center for Housing. 12 A ULI Advisory Services Panel Report During the study tour, the panel observed that in several communities multiple cars were parked in front of each home, thus supporting the theory that people are living together in order to afford the high cost of housing in the county. adjusted several times, ranging from 20 to 30 percent at any given time. In 1981, the housing burden rate for rentals was rees- tablished at 30 percent of gross annual income. Gradu- ally, this limit was extended to homeownership. In the mid-1990s, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac would purchase mortgages only if their principal, interest, tax, and insur- ance (PITI) payments were 28 percent or less of the borrower's gross income for a conventional loan and 29 percent for a loan insured by the Federal Housing Admin- istration. Since that time, almost all cost -burden limits for Table 1: Cost Burden in Collier County housing have been around 30 percent of a household's gross income (https://www.census.gov/housing/census/ publications/who -can -afford.pdf). Used in conjunction with the 30 percent cost -burden threshold is severe cost burden, which includes house- holds that pay more than 50 percent of gross income toward housing costs. Those households are the most at risk —regardless of locality. Defining the Cost -Burden Problem In 2015, Collier County had a population of 343,802 and 140,131 households. The Shimberg Center at the Univer- sity of Florida estimates that of the 140,131 households, 58,685 (40 percent) were cost burdened in 2015—mean- ing they spent more than 30 percent of their gross income on housing. Of those 58,685 households, 29,342 were considered severely cost burdened —meaning they spent more than 50 percent of their gross income on housing. This finding means that two out of every five households in Collier County are cost burdened, with one in five severely cost burdened. Burden for Three -Person Household Earning 30 to 150 Percent of Area Median Income Annual household income $20,160 $29,600 $47,300 $59,125 $65,038 $70,950 $88,688 Percentage of income I Percentage of income Percentage of income Percentage of area needed to afford needed to afford needed to afford median income median rent* median -price home** median -price condo*** 30 61 149 101 50 41 101 69 80 26 63 43 100 21 51 35 110 19 46 L 31 120 17 42 29 _ 150 14 JL. .&__ 23 Sources: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development; The 2016 Collier County Economic, Demographic & Community Profile; the American Community Survey. *Median gross rent is $1,020 per month, as defined by the Shimberg Center in 2015. **Median sales price is $405,000, including mortgage and interest at a 20 percent downpayment for 30 years, plus estimated homeowner's insurance, property taxes, and flood insurance. ***Median sales price for condominiums and townhouses is $257,000, including mortgage and interest at 20 percent downpayment for 30 years, plus estimated homeowner's insurance, property taxes, and flood insurance. Collier County, Florida, January 29—February 3, 2017 13 However, the issue of cost burden may be larger than the numbers indicate. Not all of the households counted in the census are year-round residents, and most of those part- time households have incomes that support their residence in the county, which is a second residence. Therefore, it is likely that the actual percentages of cost burden are substantially higher among residents who live in the county year-round. To better understand the meaning of "cost burdened" in Collier County, the panel analyzed the correlation between household income and housing prices or rental rates. In 2016, the estimated AMI for Collier County was $65,700, and the average household size was 2.47. For a snapshot of the cost -burden issue, see table 1 Who Is Cost Burdened in Collier County? The people who are cost burdened in Collier County are crucial to the local economy. They provide key public safety, education, and health care services to the com- munity's residents. In addition, they are responsible for the high -quality lifestyle that makes Collier County such a special place. Examples of workers in the cost -burdened category include the following: ■ Health care: Nurses, medical assistants, senior service providers ■ Education: Teachers and other school employees ■ Public safety: Police officers, firefighters ■ Service industry workers: Wait staff, hotel staff, retail and trade salespeople, golf course employees, land- scape maintenance workers ■ Entry-level or nonprofit professionals: Bank tellers, social workers, office managers, government employees Not every person in those fields will have difficulty finding housing that is affordable. For example, dual -income households have increased purchasing power. However, people receiving entry-level and median income rates in health care, public safety, and professional sectors are more likely to experience a cost burden than are the people holding executive, management, and supervisory positions. Also, single -income households, which can include one- to four -person households, are more likely to experience a cost burden or even a severe cost burden when living in Collier County. Table 2 provides a representative sample of employment positions in Collier County and what people in such posi- tions can afford in the local market. Across the board, the ability to afford houses priced at the median sales price from 2015 was low. The ability to afford rental units at the median gross rent (plus utilities) was more reasonable, with affordability attainable for some of the people holding professional positions. During the panel process, the panel heard many stories regarding how difficult it is to recruit service industry work- ers, particularly those who work at the resorts and hotels, including housekeepers, front -desk staff members, and golf course attendants. The panel's analysis of cost burden for those jobs indicates that there is substantial cost burden for such workers unless they share living space or commute long distances. One critical challenge for Collier County businesses is the ability to recruit entry-level professionals. Mid- and upper -level professionals in public safety, education, government, and health care can afford a wider range of housing. However, such is not the case for entry-level professionals, who often end up living far away from their source of employment (particularly in Lee County). Having employees who reside outside of Collier County and who commute long distances for work often means a high level of attrition for businesses. Furthermore, when people who work in the county are commuting to adjoining municipali- ties to live, the county bears the costs of the roads without the benefit of receiving the tax revenue. Collectively, the employment sectors that are the most at risk to incur a significant cost burden represent more than 50 percent of the local labor force. But beyond that, the sectors represent the core of county, public safety, 14 A ULI Advisory Services Panel Report Table 2: Estimated Cost Burden for Households Headed by Selected Wage Earners Health care Registered nurse $47,000—$65,000 ° 38% Medical assistant $30,000—$35,000 41 % Emergency technician $28,000—$36,000 42% 68% Education Teacher $44,000—$59,000 28% 50% Teaching assistant $22,000—$24,000 45% 101 % Public safety Firefighter $39,000—$57,000 43% Patrol officer $47,000—$59,000 41 % Service workers Maid and housekeeping $18,000—$22,000 Massage therapist $26,000—$55,000 37% 44% Concierge $25,000—$31,000 48% Entry-level/midtier professional Human resources specialist $35,000—$55,000 31% 45% Dental assistant $33,000—$43,000 36% 57% Administrative assistant $22,000—$33,000 73% - Housing cost accounts for less than 30 percent of gross income (not cost burdened) _ Housing cost accounts for 30 to 50 percent of gross income (cost burdened) - Housing cost accounts for 50 percent or more of gross income (severely cost burdened) Sources: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, The 2016 Collier County Economic, Demographic & Community Profile; the American Community Survey. and education services, and those services support the background of the lifestyle, health, and overall vitality of the county. Other important groups of residents with substantial needs include low- to moderate -income seniors, both those who live independently and those who require services; residents who require mental health treatment and various other services; and very low -wage earners. Those resi- dents face virtually no supply of housing or no continuity in being provided social and health services. Most experience long wait lists at the few available housing sites, and many have to be relocated outside of the county to areas with a greater concentration of housing and services. Going Beyond the Root of the Problem If one is to understand the full spectrum of housing afford- ability, it is critical to examine the aspects of the challenge that go beyond housing costs. Those additional crucial factors include added housing costs, housing supply and availability, transportation costs, and future growth implications for the county, and such factors are examined in further detail in the following sections. Added Housing Costs In Collier County, housing affordability for homeowners (and especially first-time homeowners) means more than Collier County, Florida, January 29—February 3, 2017 15 just taking into consideration PITI. Utilities and home- ownership association fees also come into play when determining housing affordability and cost burden. After interviewing several area stakeholders, the panel believes that the percentage of cost -burdened Collier County households is even higherthan outlined in the earlier section. One reason the percentage is higher is that many households cannot afford a 20 percent downpayment, which means they must pay private mortgage insurance, thus reducing the amount of home they can afford. In addition, almost all areas of Collier County require flood insurance, which adds a substantial monthly cost on top of all the costs just described. Moreover, Collier County has one of the highest homeowner insurance rates in Florida. Availability When one considers cost burden and affordability, one must also consider availability and quality. Housing units at the bottom of the cost spectrum often are made up of a high percentage of units with quality and maintenance concerns. If one considers the total number of units existing at differ- ent rental and sale prices, availability of those units at any given time can significantly constrain access to housing that is affordable. The panel took a "snapshot" of units available on the market using readily accessible, publicly available portals to find housing (Zillow.com, Trulia.com, Apartments.com). Using the income bands of 25 different employment Table 3: Collier County Housing Market Snapshot Units Affordable for Households Earning Less Than 100 Percent of Area Median Income Housing type Single-family, for -sale homes Condominiums Number of units 125` , 65-250** Single-family rentals Multifamily rentals Sources: Zillowcom; Apartments.com. '3.8 percent of inventory on multiple listing services "Priced at $120,000 to $175,000 0 , 23 categories, the panel looked to see how many units were available below the cost -burden threshold of 30 percent (table 3). The analysis provided several interesting results. Although a reasonable number of condominiums were available (but no additional homeowners association fees were considered in the analysis, which may have resulted in fewer options), very few single-family homes were for sale, and there were very limited rental options, which indicated a particularly constrained rental market. For any worker or single -income household with income between 80 and 100 percent of AMI, options were extremely limited, to say nothing of those households making less than 80 percent, which represent a substantial percentage of workers who are cost burdened. Transportation Crucial to the cost -burden conversation is the combination of housing cost and transportation cost. According to data from the Center for Neighborhood Technology, households at 90 to 100 percent of area median income can incur housing and transportation costs of 75 percent of their gross income. That figure is 61 percent for households between 100 and 120 percent of AMI. Furthermore, de- pending on the distance from employment and other activity centers, transportation costs for Collier County households can fluctuate wildly. In some cases, households may incur 5 to 10 percent more in transportation costs if they are located farther away from employment and other services. Growth Implications In a county expected to grow significantly in population by 2040, what does that finding mean for the future? The county is expected to add 58,000 households over the next 23 years. If the local issue of cost burden is not addressed, then —at a minimum-11,000 more households will experience severe cost burden (above 50 percent) than do households today. Given ever -rising real estate values and a seemingly bottomless demand for higher -end homes and rentals, the likelihood of both the number and percentage of cost -burdened households increasing is high. 16 A ULI Advisory Services Panel Report Vision. What Do You Want to Be When You Grow Up? THE PANEL TOURED KEY AREAS of Collier to get a comprehensive look at the county. The panel also inter- viewed more than 90 stakeholders during this process, reaching out to residents, elected and appointed officials, business leaders, real estate developers, and nonprofit leaders. From the study tours and interviews, the panel did not hear a strong consensus regarding the path forward for Collier County. However, several common themes and community values were frequently raised. Those traits are both existing and aspirational: some have already been im- plemented across the county (such as the Blue Zone and the commitment to beautification), while others are indica- tive of recent concerns and current shortcomings (such as economic development and traffic). The common themes and community values include the following: ■ Maintaining Collier County's reputation as a premiere tourist destination ■ Growing and maintaining a strong real estate base and retaining steady values ■ Retaining a safe and healthy community ■ Enhancing and sustaining a visually attractive and aes- thetically pleasing community with character ■ Ensuring an efficient transportation system ■ Diversifying the local economy What the Future of Collier County Looks Like Collier County's current debate on housing affordability is not a new one. The panel heard repeatedly about the community's reservations regarding another discussion on housing affordability —the topic has been widely discussed for many years —with the Great Recession and housing downturn halting past efforts. These on -again, off -again discussions reflect the cyclical nature of this issue and the related concern it raises. Today, with new interests and partners realigning around the housing issue, a variety of pathways and solutions can be explored. Considering the overall values raised by community members, the panel believes two key scenarios Collier County is home to pristine beaches and enviable weather; it also boasts a mix of urban, suburban, and rural land use patterns. Nonetheless, the panel believes that Collier County does not have a vision for what it wants to be in the future. (Left to right: Ave Maria, Naples's iconic beaches, and the panel's public reception) Collier County, Florida, January 29—February 3, 2017 17 face Collier County: a future with action and a future with- out action. A wide range of options and interventions exists within this dichotomy and will produce varying outputs and results. The scenarios presented next are intended to illustrate specific certainties that the panel believes will be inevitable under current conditions. The Future of Collier County without Action on Housing If county leaders choose not to respond to the current housing needs, it is likely that the current market condi- tions and trends will continue to advance and evolve. Local employers will continue to have difficulty hiring and retaining key employees in the county, which will create a "brain drain" out of the community and into neighboring jurisdictions, such as Lee County. Not only does this market condition place a strain on employers' ability to hire and retain high -quality talent, but also it means more workers and middle-class laborers will be commuting greater distances, thereby increasing transportation con- gestion and mitigating quality of life and civic engagement. In addition, Collier County's local economy will lose tax revenue as incomes earned in the county leave to neigh- boring jurisdictions because out -of -county employees tend to spend a greater portion of their income by going to gro- cery stores, restaurants, and dry cleaners in their residen- tial communities. Therefore, Collier County will continue to sustain the burden of influx infrastructure strain, while receiving no tax revenue from it. Those conditions create an intensified landscape of competition between counties, instead of mutual collaboration for the betterment of the region. With no action on housing, Collier County will be forced to create reactionary policy and will have more dif- ficulty when guiding future growth of the county. The Future of Collier County with Action on Housing Conversely, if the county takes appropriate action and intervenes, the aforementioned trends could be redirected in a more financially and economically sustainable direc- tion for the county. Although the panel report will identify the specific strategies for all residents of Collier County, having a proactive policy right now will redirect the current housing and demographic trends and will create positive benefits for the county. The local economy will benefit by retaining a self- sustaining employment base in which people can work in Collier County's Sheriff's Department, public schools, hotels, and restaurants and can live in the county. The benefits include an increase in tax revenue generated by the in -county residents, a lesser strain on existing transportation infrastructure, and an increase in the qual- ity of life for this vital segment of the community. Also, employers will have a better chance of attracting and retaining talented and skilled workers in the county, which will improve the overall quality of life in the county and will build a stronger middle class. With the growing aging demographic, a proactive policy will make the county a more hospitable place for longtime residents to age in place and to receive health care. Also, keeping this older demographic in the county will generate county tax revenue from the group's use of local pharma- cies, grocery stores, and specialized medical services. By taking a proactive approach toward addressing housing, Collier County can develop a vision that expands on and enhances the existing unique qualities of the county. Why a Vision Is Important The panel believes that the overall priorities of the county lack a collective vision; without such a vision, aligning and prioritizing government processes and policies will be challenging. Collier County is still facing near -certain changes —with or without a unifying vision —particularly regarding the incoming population and real estate growth. If one considers the expectations around building growth and residential influx, the problems facing the county today will be amplified in the coming years, thus exacerbating the current pain points (traffic, workforce, costs). In short, the status quo in Collier County will work only for a limited number of people and for a limited amount of time. The 18 A ULI Advisory Services Panel Report As part of the study, the panel met with community stakeholders, including residents, business and community leaders, and other representatives from the larger Collier County community. panel feels strongly that without proactive management, the anticipated growth will erode the very qualities that attracted people to the county in the first place. The panel recommends that the creation of a vision for Collier County should come from the county itself, as a self -directed exercise, and should be inclusive of all stake- holders. However, to ensure the exercise and the results have the desired effect, the panel provides the following elements that the county should include in its vision: ■ Provide key considerations around quality of life for all residents, as well as how to improve and maintain it. ■ Provide a range of housing options that are accessible to the full spectrum of consumers. Housing options should be economically and geographically diverse throughout the county, as well as having a range in sizes and types such as single-family homes and rental apartments. Additional key factors to consider when providing hous- ing options include the reasonable proximity to jobs, schools, amenities, and transportation choices. There should also be an inclusive mix of income levels in dif- ferent neighborhoods. ■ Grow and sustain a thriving economy that includes qualities such as livable wages, job opportunities that provide pathways to wealth creation and upward mobil- ity, diversified industries, and a diversified workforce. ■ Provide accessible, multimodal transportation options that safely and efficiently connect all residents to jobs, amenities, and services. In addition, provide clear directives to governing entities to help align policies and processes with the envisioned future for the county. Collier County, Florida, January 29—February 3, 2017 19 Implementation THE PANEL IS IMPRESSED WITH the planning and study that has already been completed regarding housing affordability in Collier County. The panel's recommenda- tions reflect and endorse much of the work that has al- ready been completed. However, what is abundantly clear to the panel is that action and implementation are crucial to creating sustainable solutions. Implementation of the panel's recommendations will require sincere action, tremendous political will, and strong leadership. For addi- tional reference, the panel has created a proposed imple- mentation schedule to provide a blueprint for how to move forward on the recommendations described throughout this section in the short, medium, and long term. (See ap- pendix A.) The panel's major recommendations are organized around the following six core strategies to address housing afford- ability: ■ Increase supply; ■ Maintain supply; ■ Regulate and govern; ■ Enhance transportation options; ■ Enhance wages; and ■ Engage, market, and educate. Increase Supply How can Collier County meet its current and future hous- ing needs? One approach to achieving the goals is by adding housing that is affordable to households with a wide range of income levels. There is good news to share. - several strategies include simply making improvements to existing procedures and vehicles rather than creating new programs entirely. There is no need to reinvent the wheel when existing structures already support the development of more affordable housing. The Housing Trust Fund The housing trust fund (HTF) is an example of a national best practice that Collier County currently has at its disposal but does not use. More than 700 HTFs exist nationwide, and they are often a critical element of a jurisdiction's overall housing policy. Collier County's HTF should be sustainable and predict- able, given the long planning process involved in housing development. The county should keep in mind that what can make an HTF challenging is finding viable revenue sources. Other jurisdictions have funded their trust funds through sales taxes, real estate transfer taxes, linkage fees as part of the zoning ordinance, inclusionary zoning in -lieu fees, condominium conversion fees or demolition fees, and hotel and motel taxes. The best and most common revenue source for a county HTF is a document record- ing fee, which is a fee paid upon filing various types of official documents with a state or local government. This fee is one of the few revenue sources that most counties can commit to, and the panel recommends Collier County consider this approach. Development Incentives The county's existing developer incentives have clearly failed to transform existing development patterns and allow for greater production of housing that is affordable to a broad range of low- to moderate -income households. Any developer incentives need to be reasonable, be flex- ible, and allow for creative partnerships to produce new, affordable homes. The panel strongly recommends that the county put increased emphasis on multifamily rental 20 A ULI Advisory Services Panel Report County Housing Trust Fund Dedicated Revenue Sources Revenue Source County Trust Funds Document recording fee Arlington County, Virginia; 9 New Jersey counties; 54 Pennsylvania counties; 39 Washington counties Property tax Kalamazoo County, Michigan; King County, Washington Inclusionary zoning in -lieu fees Sonoma County, California Tax increment funds Alameda County, California Delinquent property tax penalties and Toledo/Lucas County, Ohio interest (land bank) Real estate transfer tax Columbus/Franklin County, Ohio Hotel/motel tax Columbus/Franklin County, Ohio Developer impact fees/proffers Fairfax County, Virginia Food and beverage tax Dade County, Florida Sale of foreclosed properties Traverse City, Michigan (now expired) Sales/use tax Summit County, Colorado ' General funds North Valley/Chico, Alameda County, Los Angeles County, Santa Barbara County, Sonoma County, and San Luis Obispo County, California; Tompkins County, New York (with Ithaca and Cornell University); Arlington County, Virginia; 24 counties in Iowa Source: Housing Trust Fund Project, Center for Community Change, 2016. housing as a means of addressing its affordability housing situation. Multifamily rental housing is the most cost- effective way to provide housing that is affordable to the average working person. The panel recommends that existing density bonuses be reassessed to allow for and provide incentives for more mixed -use development and greater efficiency of land use throughout the county. This recommendation will be dis- cussed in greater detail later in this report, but the current density bonus program needs revision to allow for higher densities to ensure that additional mixed -income, mixed - tenure (rental as well as homeownership) developments are financially feasible. Examples of this type of increased den- sity include Bayfront and Naples Square, at more than 20 to 30 units per acre rather than the average 2.5 units per acre in other residential communities. The density can also be flexible to allow for complementary adjacent uses and to reflect different preferences in the urban and rural areas. -VI Impact fees are an often -cited source of frustration to those creating both market rate and affordable housing products. Not only are high impact fees an impediment to new construction of affordable housing, but also they can be erratic and can be an ineffective way to raise revenue. During periods of high growth, they can produce lots of cash, but during slow periods of growth, the revenue provided by such fees falls, sometimes precipitously. An example of existing density that allows for a mix of uses in p downtown Naples along Fifth Avenue. Collier County, Florida, January 29—February 3, 2017 21 Inclusive Housing Strategy: Tysons Corner, Virginia A sprawling edge city begins to remake itself as a more walkable, sustainable place, with transit -accessible, mixed - income housing at its core. Fairfax County, Virginia, home to 1.1 million residents, is the most populous county in the Washington, D.C., region and is one of the most prosperous in the nation, with a median household income of nearly $113,000. The county's development since the 1960s and its image today have been shaped by the growth of Tysons Corner, a roughly 1,700-acre area originally marked by the intersection of state Routes 7 and 123. For a half century, "Tysons" has epitomized the commercially successful suburban employment center and retail destination, which is dominated by large office buildings occupied by white-collar companies and high -end shopping malls. Tyson's enormous economic success —it was the nation's 12th- largest central business district as recently as 2014—came over time with substantial costs in the form of traffic congestion and sprawling development. The number of homes and apartments fell far behind the number of jobs; investment fell short of needs in cultural amenities, green space, and schools; and transit options were limited. Tysons's very economic model came into question. For local business leaders and elected officials, the future of Tysons depends on whether it can reinvent itself as a more complete community. Under the rubric of a "Transforming Tysons" plan, Fairfax County has established goals to be met by 2050: increase the number of Tysons residents to 100,000 (from 19,000 today), double the number of jobs to 200,000, and ensure that at least three-quarters of the new growth is within a half -mile of Metro stations (four stations opened in the Tysons area in 2014). Fairfax County also intends Tysons to be a mixed -income residential community —a place where construction and service workers, teachers, and others in need of more affordable housing can afford to live. To achieve that goal, the county has ambitiously expanded a longstanding county policy that has been a national model for promoting inclusionary housing development. Equity Strategies, Results, and Challenges Since 1990, the county has generally required residential development projects (excluding high rises) to set aside a share of units (generally 5 to 12.5 percent) for households earning 50 to 70 percent of the Washington metro area median income. Developments receive a density bonus — permission to increase the size of the project —to help mitigate the economic cost of delivering the below -market units. This affordable dwelling unit (ADU) program has generated more than 2,500 affordable units to date, with about an equal mix of rental and for -sale housing. Research indicates that Fairfax County ADU homes and apartments are overwhelmingly located in low -poverty neighborhoods and in areas with schools comparable to those in places without ADUs. Research also indicates that the program has not deterred developers from delivering profitable projects in the county. By state law, the ADU program does not apply to high-rise buildings — precisely the type of development the county wants to see near transit in the Tysons transformation plan. Recognizing that this exemption would undermine the opportunity to provide a wider range of housing choice in Tysons, the county expanded its inclusionary policy so it could be applied more effectively in the area. As a result, 20 percent of all high-rise units in Tysons must meet affordability requirements, albeit at higher income levels than the ADU program. Though low- and mid -rise buildings are still covered by the ADU program, their developers are encouraged to meet the higher standard as well. As of June 2016, 356 affordable units had been delivered in Tysons. Future development up to allowed densities could result in the creation of as many as 4,200 units in the area. Tysons will also generate funding to support affordable housing through payments that office, retail, and hotel development projects must make in return for receiving county approval to build at greater densities —generally either a one-time contribution of $3 per square foot or annual payment of $0.25 per square foot for 16 years. As of 2014, this policy was projected to generate more than $64 million for investment in affordable housing in Tysons through a trust fund. The capacity of Tysons to become a more equitable community is interlinked with its evolution into a denser, more walkable area and with its careful use of inclusionary development practices and incentives as that evolution occurs. Researcher Christopher Leinberger, whose work has suggested that more -walkable urban places can advance an array of social -equity outcomes as well as deliver superior economic returns, has noted of Tysons: "Many of the neighborhood associations surrounding [Tysons] became supporters of increased density because of the promised walkable urban future. NIMBYs (not in my backyard) became YIMBYs (yes in my backyard)." The Tysons inclusionary housing policy is not perfect. In exchange for requiring a higher percentage of inclusionary units than under the existing ADU program, the county raised the income levels of eligible families, reflecting the realities of development feasibility. To serve families with very low incomes, the county will need to offer development subsidies through the trust fund and other sources. And while the Tysons policy appears to be working well for rental apartment buildings, it has proven more problematic for for -sale projects. In November 2016, the Washington Post reported: "County leaders are considering relaxing the 20 percent expectation for high-rise condominium projects, after developers complained that it will make it harder to secure financing for their typically smaller buildings." The county worked with the development community to revise the policy to reflect market conditions that had changed since it was put in place, and the first condominium project was recently approved. 22 A ULI Advisory Services Panel Report The high fee structure, however, reflects the limited sources available to Collier County to support develop- ment of all types. The panel recommends a review of the impact fee structure to consider how to better incentivize developers to build a spectrum of housing types and sizes. Further, the panel recommends that the current impact fee deferral program cover all types of income -restricted hous- ing, regardless of whether it is single-family, multifamily, senior, or special needs housing. National Best Practices In addition to enhancing existing tools to create affordable housing, the panel recommends tailoring several national best practices to Collier County's unique characteristics to supplement the county's ability to meet current and future housing needs. Inclusionary zoning (IZ) is an approach to add to the supply of affordable housing options by linking the zones to the creation of market -rate housing. IZ programs have been used across the country since 1972 and vary greatly in terms of their structure and requirements. Given the under - use of the existing density bonus program, the county needs to consider a more proactive approach to increase the supply of housing options for all of its residents. Although IZ programs may not produce a high volume of units, such programs have the unique ability to provide the choice to residents to live in communities with better access to transit, jobs, and schools. IZ programs can be flexible in implementation to fit the needs of the county and to fit different project types. For example, the county may want to allow for the provision of inclusionary units to be produced off site; the payment for units through a fee -in -lieu arrangement to the HTF; or the creation of partnerships between for -profit and nonprofit developers so the units best fit the respective business models and expertise. Mitigating the cost of land —something that is fixed, limited, and a significant challenge to all developers in Collier County —can be addressed through vehicles such as a community land trust (CLT) and through a program to Case Study: Palm Beach County Workforce Housing Program Palm Beach County's Workforce Housing Program requires all new developments of more than ten units to provide units for households earning 60 to 120 percent of AMI in exchange for additional density allowances on a sliding scale. Developers have the flexibility to meet the affordable housing requirements by paying an in -lieu fee, building units off site, or purchasing and deed restricting market -rate units. To date, more than 1,400 affordable or workforce units have been approved as part of 36 developments. In addition, nearly $900,000 of in -lieu fees have been collected from three developments. The program was established in 2004 but gained traction in the market only after 2009, when the county made substantial revisions as a result of recommendations by the real estate industry, including homebuilders and realtors. An evaluation of the program found that the county's incentives fully offset the cost or lost profit incurred by developers in providing the affordable and workforce units. designate public land for public goods, such as affordable housing. CLTs are nonprofit, community -based organiza- tions whose mission is to provide affordable housing in perpetuity by owning land and leasing it to those who live in houses built on that land. Although CLTs may have a broad mission, their primary role is providing successful homeownership opportunities for generations of lower - income families. A related approach to the CLT is to consider a ground lease structure. This approach both dramatically reduces the cost of the land to the developer and helps ensure long-term affordability for the housing built on that site. The city of Naples has used this approach in at least two instances at the Jasmine Cay and Carver Apartments. The panel also recommends that the county immediately undertake a review of the current land inventory to identify parcels that may be available for housing development Collier County, Florida, January 29—February 3, 2017 23 opportunities. This review can be accomplished using a cross -agency strategy, and the county should find ways to engage with community stakeholders to identify possible sites and building intensities. A related part of using public land for public good is to colocate affordable housing with the renovation or creation of new public facilities. One suc- cessful example includes building affordable housing for seniors adjacent to a new public library at a development called the Bonifant in Silver Spring, Maryland. It is not the sole responsibility of either the government or the private sector to provide for the housing needs of all residents in Collier County. The best way to produce housing effectively that meets a broad, rather than narrow, range of housing needs is through effective public/private partnerships. Elements of effective public/private partner- ships include creating a shared vision, clear roles and responsibilities, consistent and coordinated leadership, and frequent communication. Repurposing Vacant and Underused Retail Space Another unique opportunity for Collier County to add to its supply of affordable housing is to take advantage of existing vacant and underused retail sites along major transportation corridors through a conversion to multi- family residential buildings. This effort would accomplish several goals simultaneously, including these: ■ Returning underperforming buildings to the tax rolls and generating revenue for the county, and ■ Providing an option for rental apartments along existing transportation corridors without the need to create new infrastructure. The county's regular rental housing surveys have found va- cancy rates in multifamily rental buildings to be extremely low, at 1 to 2 percent, thus indicating a significant unmet demand for rental housing options. Maintain Supply One of the most cost-effective and efficient means of providing affordable housing is to maintain the existing The Bonifant in downtown Silver Spring, Maryland, is a transit - oriented development for lower -income seniors that is adjacent to the new Silver Spring library and within walking distance of transit and bus lines. supply. The National Housing Trust finds that renovating an existing property can be one-third to one-half as expensive as new construction. Renovating older properties does not require new land for development, takes advantage of existing infrastructure, and reduces construction waste. Collier County has an existing renovation code available to developers looking to refurbish existing properties, and the county should encourage its use through incentives mentioned previously, such as through expedited permit- ting and inspections and by reducing or deferring the associated fees. The county can identify opportunities proactively by track- ing properties with expiring affordability covenants (using resources such as the National Housing Preservation database) to ensure that existing rental properties remain affordable for the long term. The county should also explore implementing a right of first refusal to purchase The panel strongly recommends that the county take an inventory of vacant and underused commercial parcels that might be available for housing development. 24 A ULI Advisory Services Panel Report Inclusive Housing Strategies: Pasadena, California Pasadena (population 140,000), a southern California city renowned for its high quality of life, faces formidable challenges in providing affordable housing in an expensive market with high land costs and a limited amount of developable property. Sustained price appreciation has made housing unaffordable —even for households earning more than $100,000 annually. Through an array of incentive -based programs, including an inclusionary housing ordinance (IHO) and a density bonus, the city has supported development of more than 5,000 transit - oriented housing units since 2001, including 1,370 units of affordable and workforce housing. The Housing Incentives Fee Program, adopted by the city council in 2004, incentivizes production of affordable housing by providing developers with significant reductions in impact fees, building permit fees, construction taxes, and transportation fees. The city adopted its density bonus ordinance in 2006, which provides developers of housing projects that include affordable units with a bonus in the number of units that may be constructed on a site. (either by the county or by a nonprofit partner) expiring use properties so the county can prevent the loss of any housing that is affordable to low- and moderate -income residents and that might result in displacement. Regulate and Govern After a review of existing regulations, interviews with stakeholders, and an understanding of current market conditions, the panel determined that the county faces inherent difficulties, unnecessary costs, and a lack of predictability to developing affordable housing projects. Al- though internal and external market forces play a large role in the success of the projects, the county could reduce approval times and costs while increasing predictability in the review process in three steps: ■ Update regulations to encourage affordable housing development in desired areas. Pasadena has emphasized links to transit by clustering mixed -use projects near light -rail stations, major corridors, and employment areas. Because of efforts to encourage transit -oriented development, the majority of residential and mixed -use projects built during the 2000s were located within a half mile of a transit stop or employment center. More than 50 percent of the affordable units produced under the IHO were developed along such major corridors. Two large IHO projects have been developed close to Gold Line light -rail stations, and a third project (totaling 212 units) is forthcoming. In addition, Pasadena's efforts to promote affordable housing have extended beyond simple subsidies to encompass community outreach. According to William Huang, the city's housing director, "The success of affordable housing is rarely only financial. Even if funding is secured, gaining public acceptance is a prerequisite." r ■ Permit higher densities in urban areas for projects with affordable housing by -right. ■ Revise the governance structure, and streamline the process. Review and Revise the Land Development Code Good codes are the foundation on which great communi- ties are built. When done well, codes make it easier for a community to implement its vision. However, the current Land Development Code (LDC) does not consistently sup- port and encourage growth in already existing urbanized areas of the county (those areas generally west of Collier Parkway). Many of the LDC's ordinances are geared toward large-scale, planned -unit developments (PUDs) on greenfield sites. Conversely, smaller -scale redevelopment and infill sites in already developed areas of the county are challeng- ing to consolidate, may need to address adjacent uses and neighborhood concerns, and often require additional Collier County, Florida, January 29—February 3, 2017 25 density to make them financially feasible. Because of the way that current codes are written, PUDs generally have been more predictable to entitle and have fewer barriers to obtaining funding. Although difficult to develop, projects in the urban areas of the county can yield great benefits by placing residents near existing transit, employment, shopping, and other daily needs and by reducing strain on existing infrastructure. Even though Collier County routinely amends portions of its LDC, consideration should be given to initiating an effort to overhaul the code by implementing a Smart Code, also known as a Unified Development Code (https:// transect.org/codes.html) to encourage the development of affordable and mixed -income housing. Smart Codes are designed to differentiate between more urban and rural conditions that reflect the different characteristics and priorities found across the county. Unique standards for the different tiers of density encourage a more diverse development pattern while encouraging affordable housing in a mixed -use, pedestrian -scaled environment. In a Smart Code framework, all regulatory standards are combined into one streamlined document to prioritize environmental protection, high -quality design, and compatibility with existing patterns of development. The focus of the urban tier should be to stimulate and accommodate infill growth while encouraging affordable housing. This focus can be accomplished through residential density bonuses, mixed -use height bonuses, reductions from parking requirements, modifications to The Bayfront Naples development is an example of successful and appropriate density and mixed -use development in Collier County. buffer and landscape requirements, and other incentive - based measures. In addition to the county's creating a Smart Code, several LDC revisions could make it easier to develop affordable dwelling units in urban portions of the county: ■ Reduce parking standards: Consider establishing standard percentage reductions in minimum parking requirements for urban portions of the county where there are more transit services, where opportunities exist to walk to shopping and employment, and where shared parking opportunities exist to promote efficient site design and reduce development costs. Typical parking standards for multifamily housing in more urban areas range from 1 to 1.5 spaces per unit. ■ Create well-defined compatibility, building mass- ing, and buffer standards: The panel heard about several recent development applications in which com- patibility with adjacent existing communities has fueled distrust between existing neighborhoods and developers. The conflicts are in part due to a lack of clear expecta- tions as to what is required by the LDC. For infill develop- ment projects that include affordable housing, this lack of certainty causes an unnecessary burden on developers while at the same time residents have concerns about property values and existing views. As an example, Okla- homa City created a development guide (http://planokc. org/wpcontent/u p loads/2016/06/p lanokc_Chap2_ DevelopmentGuide.pdf; page 71) that focuses on urban design solutions for compatibility related to building scale and site design. It provides clear expectations to both the existing neighborhoods and developers as to what should be expected when designing the site and massing of buildings. Those types of standards can also help set community expectations if it is determined that redevel- opment of nonfunctioning golf courses is appropriate. ■ Permit guest houses as accessory dwelling rental units: There are a number of existing guest homes, pre- dominantly in the eastern portions of the county and the Estates, that —if permitted to be used as rentals —could have an immediate effect on the supply of affordable 26 A ULI Advisory Services Panel Report rental housing. Additional rental income could also have a positive effect for families who own the units. Although effects on transportation, schools, and other facilities should be considered, these units have already been constructed, are occupied, or have been occupied in the past. Making them legal to lease allows code enforce- ment to better regulate the units while limiting exploita- tion of renters. ■ Encourage smart -site infrastructure: According to a number of interviewees, the panel heard that several onerous land development requirements add unneces- sary expense to overall project costs. The requirements further exacerbate challenges to providing affordable units in projects. Examples include requiring sidewalks on both sides of the street, right-of-way commitments, utility spacing, and other requirements that are more burdensome to on -site development than are the neigh- boring Lee County standards. Target Certain Activity Centers for Significantly Higher Density with the Provision of Mixed - Income Housing Collier County currently has high concentrations of housing in particularly low -density areas of the county. A healthy mixed -income community has higher densities to promote a walkable environment but not high concentrations of low-income housing in one place. Mixed -income com- munities are a market -based approach and include diverse housing for people with a range of income levels. Mixed - income communities are healthier than homogenous, low-income neighborhoods because they prevent blight, support upward mobility, and help retain property values. The panel recommends the following two approaches to achieve these goals: Strengthen the Affordable Housing Density Bonus (AHDB) Program: The current maximum residential densities permitted in Collier County are generally 16 units per acre within specified activity centers of the county when affordable housing is provided (excluding transfer of development rights opportunities). Although maximum buildout of density is frequently not achieved in large PUDs, smaller infill sites in the western urban portions of the county need additional density to be financially viable. This need was confirmed during the panel's interviews where developers consistently stated that to provide affordable housing on site, the number of residential units allowed per acre should be significantly increased. For example, 30 units per acre may be a more realistic maximum density to properly incentivize market -rate developers to provide affordable housing. In addition, to properly capitalize on infrastructure, mini- mum densities should be provided for residential units per acre. Bonus density is even more important given the approximately 9 percent of unentitled land. Finally, the AHDB program is logistically challenging for market -rate builders to administer. ■ Identify strategic opportunity sites: As illustrated in the map above, the panel also recommends that the county consider further density increases in limited urban areas of the county such as the Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA where high -quality transit facilities along transportation corridors are provided. Streamline the Project Approval Process when Affordable Housing Is Provided Land use decisions are largely decided by the five -member Board of County Commissioners (BoCC) by a super - majority rule. According to developers, land use attorneys, planners, and other land development professionals, a great deal of uncertainty exists in knowing whether or not a zoning application will be approved because it takes only two board members to veto a project. Forprojects that in- clude affordable housing, this lack of certainty is a key im- pediment to project viability. In addition, although all board members are charged at looking at the county, no at -large board members are specifically charged with overseeing regional and countywide issues. The panel recommends considering adding two at -large board members, making the new BoCC a seven -member board, and reducing the super -majority to a five -out -of -seven approval process. If adding new BoCC members is not feasible, the panel recommends reducing the super -majority requirement to a Collier County, Florida, January 29—February 3, 2017 27 The panel created a conceptual framework to help identify activity centers and transportation corridors with a higher density of mixed -income housing development. Activity centers are denoted by red squares and transportation corridors by purple lines. simple -majority, which will provide greater certainty. For ex- ample, Hillsborough County, Florida, has a seven -member board with three at -large board members. Although there is an expedited construction permit review process, the panel recommends this process be expanded to include comprehensive plan amendments and zon- ing approvals. Comprehensive plan amendments could also be reviewed concurrently with a zoning change for projects that include affordable housing. This change to the project approval process could also be extended to include a concurrent processing of a zoning application and site plan. Consideration should be given to increasing the number of administrative approvals that do not require BoCC approval that will streamline the process and provide greater certainty. Although not strictly related to incentivizing affordable housing, Fairfax County, Virginia, provides concurrent processing (see www.fcrevit.org/publications/download/ DevelopmentlnCRD_CRA.pdf) for comprehensive plan amendments and zoning applications as an incentive for redevelopment of older areas of the county. Enhance Transportation Options Collier County, the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organiza- tion (MPO), and the city of Naples have done extensive public outreach and planning for alternative mobility op- tions in the county. From the Collier County Master Mobility Plan (2012) and MPO's Comprehensive Pathways Plan (2012), there are clear strategies and recommendations for enhancing transportation access across the county. In ad- dition, there are policy frameworks —such as the complete streets, the existing community movements including the Naples Pathways Coalition, the community Blue Zone, and the various committees and task forces that are informing a range of government entities. Those efforts have created an exemplary foundation of outreach and data to inform and to guide the implementation of a thorough alternative transportation system. Such assets and engagements are critical in the context of housing affordability, because transportation costs and convenient, efficient access to jobs seriously affect the attainability of housing and the overall viability of a community. For instance, even if housing is affordable, the costs of transportation can outweigh the financial benefits of those price points. In addition, the very workforce that most directly benefits from accessible and efficient transportation systems serves as the backbone of the Collier County economy: thus, it relegates this workforce to commutes of several hours or to life -threatening conditions (via bike and pedes- trian commutes), and it inhibits this group's productivity and employment access. Whether it is a bank teller driving to work in Naples, a landscaper riding his bike to a gated community, a waiter taking a bus to a local restaurant, or a teacher walking to a neighborhood school, the workforce of Collier County needs a range of transportation options that align with and support a range of housing choices in a variety of areas. By enacting and implementing many of the recommenda- tions that the plans call for, not only will Collier County be a more accessible community, but also it will be a healthier and more fiscally conservative area. As the aspirations and 28 A ULI Advisory Services Panel Report To enhance transportation, the panel recommends the adoption of many of the strategies and recommendations from the Collier County Master Mobility Plan (2012) and the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization Comprehensive Pathways Plan (2012). tenants of the Blue Zone Project espouse, active lifestyles are the key to healthy living. Providing a more integrated network of mobility not only provides workforce access but also provides access to healthier lifestyles. In addition, with estimated road costs averaging $4.6 million per lane mile, identifying proactive approaches that will reduce congestion and stress on roadways will save the county significant funds in the future. For all of those reasons, creating greater synergies between housing and transportation decision making and investments is vital for Collier County. Although the panel applauds the efforts of past plans and initiatives, it strongly recommends leveraging the engagement and resources already in place to create a robust multimodal transporta- tion system that better connects labor, jobs, services, and amenities to housing. It is time to act on the work of the past several years and to implement. In keeping with the plans and efforts mentioned previously, the panel recommends that Collier County specifically pursue and prioritize the following recommendations in an implementation phase. Integrate Bus Routes with Affordable Housing Locations Currently, the average headway (the average interval of time between buses pausing at a given stop on a route) in Collier County is 1.5 hours, with the shortest headway at 45 minutes. For transit riders dependent on a bus service to get to work or to other services and the MPO's ameni- ties, the infrequency of the service can make transporta- tion and access an increased difficulty. For riders who might have multiple stops or transfers, those headways can change what would be a short car ride into an all - morning or all -evening commute. If directed effectively, however, the transit service can be an extraordinary asset for the Collier County work- force, potentially reducing the group's commute and car ownership costs. According to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the average American family spends 19 percent of its household budget on transporta- tion. For families that are in transit -efficient locations, this cost decreases to 9 percent; for those in auto -dependent communities, it increases to 25 percent. Thus, transporta- tion costs can directly add or subtract substantial funds from families' household budgets, thereby increasing cost burdens or providing more flexibility in household budgets. In light of the budget realities, the panel recommends implementing the recommendations of past planning efforts and aligning affordable housing investments and bus routes to the greatest extent possible, specifically considering and including the following: ■ Identify transportation corridors for multifamily development: In keeping with best practices from com- Collier County, Florida, January 29—February 3, 2017 29 munities such as Charlotte, North Carolina, Collier County should identify specific corridors that connect to major job centers and that incentivize specific zones for further multifamily development. By linking residential growth to the transit system, the county will relieve stress on the transportation system by encouraging transit ridership and by creating more effective commutes for the work- force in affordable locations. ■ Implement park -and -ride systems: Park -and -ride is a term that describes a traffic management practice where drivers leave their cars in parking lots of identified commercial centers (typically on the outskirts of urban areas) and travel to the job or employment centers on public transportation. Given the significant footprint of development across the county, as well as the potential for additional neighborhoods such as Ave Maria develop- ing in the rural lands area, working with commercial centers to create a park -and -ride system would take congestion pressure off the internal traffic corridors and would provide workers living in outlying areas with simpler commutes to job centers. Already, circulator routes provided by the Collier Area Transit System (CATS) provide circulator services to and from major commercial centers, like the Super Walmart. The panel recommends consideration be given to enhancing, modifying, and marketing those routes as park -and -ride opportunities. In addition, the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) already operates many park -and -ride facilities across the state, thus facilitating vanpool and carpool options. ■ Explore bus rapid transit and express service lines: Recognizing that there are specific areas of greater tran- sit ridership, CATS should explore the creation of either bus rapid transit or express routes to link specific areas to job centers via an express, limited -stop route. This approach is in keeping with the effective best practices that CATS has already established around many of its bus lines. The opportunity now is to enhance what is in place and to create demand -driven transportation lines serving workers. Las Vegas, another tourism dependent economy with a wide geographic footprint, has imple- mented bus rapid transit and express service lines across Case Study: Arlington County, Virginia In Virginia, Arlington County's Special Affordable Housing Protection District (SAHPD) identifies neighborhoods with existing affordable housing within the county's metro corridors. The goal of the SAHPD is to retain affordable housing opportunities (through preservation or replacement) in the county's high -cost transit corridors. In instances where redevelopment is proposed within those districts, developers can achieve higher densities if they include one -for -one replacement of existing affordable housing as part of their project. (One -for -one replacement has been interpreted as replacing the number of bedrooms or the gross floor area on a one -for -one basis.) Replacement can occur either on site or at a similar location off site. the region to directly connect tourism workers to key areas of the city, including downtown and the Strip. Not only is the service successful, but also it is widely used by the workforce to access jobs and housing. Enhance Bike Lane and Pedestrian Systems According to the Collier County MPO's 2014 Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Study —a complementary report to the 2012 Comprehensive Pathways Plan —a survey of 478 respondents resulted in 62 percent reporting that they had felt "threatened for personal safety during bicycling or walking trips." For Collier County to reduce transporta- tion road costs, effectively move the workforce across the community, and create healthy avenues for residents to engage in civic activities, this number must be mitigated and the recommendations of both studies should be advanced. Steps toward this goal include the following: ■ Implement the Comprehensive Pathways Plan for the county: Advancing the thorough recommendations of past studies is a meaningful next step in this process, but specific prioritization should be given to the "crash corridors" and "crash clusters" identified in the safety analysis. 30 A ULI Advisory Services Panel Report An example of the successful and well -used bike lane infrastructure along 151h Street, a major downtown corridor in Washington, D.C. ■ Enhance safety for transit mobility: The recommen- dations of the 2014 "Safety Study" should be prioritized and funding should be allocated for the full implementa- tion of key safety issues, including continuing educa- tion for traffic engineers and law enforcement officers, application of the FHWA's bike and pedestrian best practices, and continued integration of best practices in engineering design. In addition, the panel recommends addressing lighting, street signage, and public awareness for bicyclists and pedestrians. ■ Hire a bike and pedestrian coordinator for the county and leverage expertise at FDOT: To take full advantage of the recommendations and work already completed, a specialized coordinator should be hired at the county level to advance bicycle and pedestrian priori- ties, including reviewing future roadway projects for bike and pedestrian enhancements and safety considerations. In New Orleans, a bike and pedestrian coordinator was able to advance the implementation of more than 100 miles of on- and off -road bike lanes after the project was embedded in the local Department of Public Works through a grant from the local utility company and sup- port from the Louisiana Public Health Institute. Establish Sustainable, Secure Revenue for Transit and Alternative Mobility CATS is serving an increasingly vital need in the county as workforce demands intensify and traffic concerns grow. However, if the service is going to be able to keep up with the demands already placed on it, a critical element is that the service has a sustainable source of revenue it can leverage and depend on. Given the expenses of highways ($4.6 million per lane mile), prioritizing proactive invest- ments in transit today could save the county significant funds in the future. In addition, given the growing bike and pedestrian needs of the county and the multitude of com- munity benefits that those amenities provide, a revenue source should also be identified and provided for such additional capacity. Create Ride -Sharing Option With smartphone apps and online connectivity, fantastic and successful tools for ride sharing are available that can be conveniently and affordably accessed. The county should explore promoting such resources and working with nonprofits to promote convenient ride -sharing options for populations living in more suburban or remote areas, like the Estates, Ave Maria, or Immokalee. The New Orleans Regional Planning Commission sponsors one such ride - share platform, the New Orleans GreenRide, which uses a social media platform to connect riders and carpoolers. Enhance Wages For several decades, middle- and lower -middle-class wages across the United States essentially have been stagnant while housing costs have risen significantly. This trend has resulted in increased pressure on affordability of housing. One effective option to address this issue is to increase wages. The panel has identified two possible options for Collier County. Collier County, Florida, January 29—February 3, 2017 31 Denver Transit -Oriented Development Fund The Denver Transit -Oriented Development Fund was established in 2010 with $13.5 million in debt capital to create and preserve affordable housing along current and future transit corridors in the city and county of Denver. In 2014, the fund was expanded to serve the surrounding seven -county region and is now capitalized at $24 million. Borrowers may use funds to purchase, hold (for up to five years), and develop sites within a half mile of fixed -rail transit stations or a quarter mile of high -frequency bus stops. The fund has closed 11 transactions totaling nearly $16 million, with a pipeline of more than 900 permanently affordable units and more than 150,000 square feet of commercial and community space. Returns to capital providers (public agencies, foundations, financial institutions, and community development financial institutions) are generally 2 to 6 percent. REW ORIEANS EWRIQE Home GreenRide Tworldl Matra New orleam Groan . We make Meehedng s. plo Mg1rn New CM.0 5 Gi _ R.%,t Cpmple" rf- e 4 helps co[ t commuters w9h cargoW amtches m �. Rye W. [10esm Mowpoilen Reywn 4V9 sl5p m9k91 9O5V 10 rW.k "g rcwmmes end crnyert mem ,nW case wlegs End emiee'rene red.O.- to ford oW r abw segislenng tirnh Grs iRide click r on Ilia hg¢nRidg Tumnal krk ehosg Gellmg started ngwkk W d eery 1 Ragnwr mid fill OW youi WcAilo. Fod end [AMKI ndeshere w4che5 . - 3 stag eaWoknp ar9 small Sign In or Regkster a Metro New Orleans GreenRide links commuters with carpool matches in the New Orleans metropolitan region. Denver's new Regional Transportation District rail system has eight rail lines servicing 53 stations along the north, east, southeast, southwest, and west rail corridors. can have a profound impact on its ability to afford housing within the community. Second, the panel recommends instituting enhanced minimum wage ordinances. Several U.S. cities including Albuquerque, New Mexico; Flagstaff, Arizona; Malibu, California; Miami Beach, Florida; Portland, Maine; and Washington, D.C., have attempted to address the issue of housing affordability this way and are seeing positive results. In virtually all cases, the ordinances call for a mod- est immediate increase in the minimum wage followed by a series of incremental steps spread over a period of three to five years that ultimately lead to a mandated minimum wage of $13 to $15 per hour. Engage, Market, and Educate Beyond moving ideas into action, education and com- munication also are critical pieces of a comprehensive and successful strategy for implementing housing affordability. First, government employees are one of the largest groups If one is to combat the often false and confusing myths affected by housing affordability issues in Collier County. regarding what affordable housing is, what it might look On the basis of cost burden for this group, the panel rec- ommends the county consider enhancing wages for county employees. Even modest increases in salary for this group like, and what unintended consequences it might create, it is crucial to educate the entire community about the full range of benefits that a balanced supply of housing brings, 32 A ULI Advisory Services Panel Report to raise awareness, and to make affordable housing a vis- ible problem to everyone. Bolster Existing Programs and Processes The county government has already developed an afford- able housing database that tracks for -sale and rental units throughout the county. However, the panel recommends enhancing this database to include and track new units coming online and to include their sunset dates so that the county has a clear understanding of the supply of afford- able units in real time. This information should include comprehensive details, including addresses, bedroom sizes, square footage, rental rates, for -sale rates, and neighborhood location. An en- hanced database will also help ensure that the community has a credible source of real-time information that shows that affordability is spread throughout the county and not concentrated in any one district. By improving existing housing information online, the county will create a robust information portal for exist- ing and prospective residents to learn about the county's housing programs and any workshops or events related to housing in the county, ensuring that residents have the right information to make housing decisions. The panel also recommends that existing housing applica- tions are streamlined for residents and handled directly by the county instead of by individual developers. During the panel's review, it heard from the development community that developers are responsible for accepting income veri- fication applications, which they are simply not qualified to manage. This process should be administered either by the county or an administrator managed by the county, such as a private or nonprofit lender. Raise Awareness and Communicate with the Entire Community Although the links between housing affordability and communications may not be immediately obvious, public awareness, communication, and an overall education cam- paign can help ensure that ongoing efforts around housing affordability succeed. The panel has seen a tremendous �� Erivisio. g Elcv .�son�na�.e�opnarr.nc: number of plans and technical recommendations, but un- less they are being communicated to the public at large in a clear and concise manner that is understandable by all, such efforts will go nowhere. To start, the panel recommends that the county develop a comprehensive marketing and communications plan that appeals to a wide variety of audiences: the current and potential residents, the business community, the local community organizations, and the proven donors within the community. The plan needs to appeal to people who are seeking housing, to people who support housing afford- ability, and to those who are skeptics. The message should be tailored around those three key audiences and the lan- guage used should be culturally sensitive, age appropriate, and multilingual. Ideally, the strategies will include written, verbal, and visual approaches. The key to the program's success is the hiring of a cre- ative, community outreach specialist. This person should be a full-time county employee and engaged in public The Center for Urban Pedagogy created an online map to help educate users on the many facets of affordable housing and to allow them to explore the income demographics of any New York City neighborhood. Collier County, Florida, January 29—February 3, 2017 33 One of the many community workshops conducted in the Park View and Pleasant Plains neighborhoods in Washington, D.C., as part of the community engagement video project SEE/ CHANGE DC. meetings, neighborhood events, and other aspects of countywide community engagement. The key to com- munity outreach is for it to occur where people already are. People will not go out of their way to go to those types of meetings; the meetings must be brought to them. For example, the outreach specialist should hold the same workshop on three different dates and times to ensure those with atypical work schedules can still participate and be engaged. Create a Residential Toolkit The county should create a residential toolkit to address three constituencies: seekers of affordable housing, supporters of affordable housing, and skeptics of affordable housing. The panel recommends that Collier County think creatively about community engagement, marketing, and education strategies. Volunteer programs such as planting projects related to new housing developments and YIMBY (yes in my backyard) campaigns are great ways to raise awareness of and to engage the larger community in housing affordability issues. Seekers of affordable housing. Building on an enhanced online inventory discussed earlier, the panel also recom- mends the county create an affordable housing directory for those residents seeking housing. The directory will list both rental and for -sale opportunities and will draw from the county's live online database. However, because not everyone is comfortable with (or has access to) the internet, the panel recommends two options for this database: ■ A web -based platform, and ■ A printed document that is updated periodically (e.g., quarterly). The panel understands that a housing resources guide is already in place, but it recommends including a resource guide that is for first-time homebuyers and that includes information about housing assistance for downpayment programs, information about renters' assistance, and information about other community resources available to the public. The purpose is not only to provide information about how someone can afford housing, but also to provide information in a way that allows people to become engaged in the community and connected with their community. In addition, the panel strongly recommends the county employ a housing counselor or expand existing housing counselors' current responsibilities. The housing coun- r dM6 � 34 A ULI Advisory Services Panel Report selor should collaborate with the community engagement specialist and other relevant county employees to create a robust educational program around what cost burden means. Also, it is essential for the housing counselor to develop programs and resources around household bud- geting and wealth creation that will help residents improve their financial management. Case Study: SEE/CHANGE DC Supporters of affordable housing. Collier County is privileged to have an engaged and effective philanthropic community. But the county needs to figure out how to get the group involved in affordable housing issues. The panel recommends partnering with the philanthropic community around specific fundraising campaigns, such as spe- cific housing development projects or facade or exterior improvement programs. In addition, the county should Though not specifically about housing, SEE/CHANGE DC is an example of a successful, creative, community engagement project to encourage community building and foster dialogue about rapid neighborhood change. Something similar in Collier County could help create discussion about housing and community and could give greater visibility to housing affordability challenges. What it is: The video art project puts a human face on how population change and revitalization are affecting two Washington, D.C., neighborhoods: Park View and Pleasant Plains. When: During fall 2016, video portraits of community members were projected in storefronts and on street corners along a main corridor — Georgia Avenue, N.W., in the Park View and Pleasant Plains neighborhoods. Who: SEE/CHANGE DC was imagined and produced by the Pink Line Project + Citizen Innovation Lab, created by Composite Co. and BellVisuals, and funded by the D.C. Office of Planning (OP) and the Kresge Foundation. How: SEE/CHANGE DC is part of OP's comprehensive creative placemaking initiative: "Crossing the Street: Building DC's Inclusive Future through Creative Placemaking" grant from the Kresge Foundation. The grant is intended to "promote community -building in neighborhoods that are experiencing rapid demographic and social change, to engage residents in conversations about the future of the District as OP embarks on an update of D.C.'s Comprehensive Plan, and to demonstrate or test select placemaking recommendations articulated in OP's neighborhood plans and District Department of Transportation transit corridor studies and livability studies." In December 2015, OP released a request for applications seeking qualified curators and project managers to work with OP and other District and community stakeholders to define and implement temporary creative placemaking projects. Curators were selected in early 2016 and projects, such as SEE/CHANGE DC, were implemented during 2016. For further information, see www.seechangedc.com. SEE/CHANGE DC is a creative video project that uses community engagement as it inspires community building and fosters conversation about neighborhood change. pose V .tr free! 1w/ nn1W�'+es. e-Mt Collier County, Florida, January 29—February 3, 2017 35 partner with the philanthropic community to develop fun and creative community volunteer projects and programs to raise awareness and bring the community together. help debunk myths and perceptions related to negative implications that are often falsely associated with afford- able housing (e.g., increased traffic, crime and density, de - Examples include planting projects related to new housing pressed property values). In addition, creating a workhouse developments, public art initiatives, "welcome wagon" programs, and "yes in my backyard" (YIMBY) campaigns. Those types of programs can go a long way toward bring- ing the community together. Skeptics of affordable housing. Do not leave out the skeptics of affordable housing. The panel recommends creating a "myths and facts" brochure (available in a printed format and on the county's housing website) to media campaign could be another valuable approach to community -wide education about housing affordability and whom it affects. 36 A ULI Advisory Services Panel Report Conclusion IT IS THE OPINION OF THE PANEL that Collier Coun- ty absolutely has a housing affordability problem. It is not a crisis yet, but if housing is not addressed, the panel be- lieves that it will become a crisis. Given the growth projec- tions for the county, the panel believes this problem will occur far sooner than expected. All of the panel's recommendations are intended to help the city and the county provide housing that is affordable for the full range of incomes found within the community. First and foremost, the panel believes the county needs to immediately come to a consensus and establish a clear vision for the county about how to move forward. Does the county want to remain a community that primarily relies on tourism and retirement, or does it want to diversify its economy? Does the county want to limit growth, or does it want to embrace it? Regardless of the answers, it is —in the panel's opinion —essential that the county address the issue of housing affordability. This approach needs to be a priority. Housing affordability is essential to creating and maintaining a vibrant, sustainable community. Although the county may well have some time to imple- ment the panel's recommendations, time is of the essence. Failure to act now will put at risk the very things that make Collier County so special. Maintaining paradise is both a privilege and an obligation. Collier County, Florida, January 29—February 3, 2017 37 Appendix A. Implementation Schedule mplementation Schedule Added Supply Regulation and Governance Communication and Education Strategies Short Term Review existing land inventory for possible Draft additions to the Land Develop- Develop inventory of affordable housing affordable housing development sites, ment Code (LDC) and the Growth units and update regularly. 0 to 3 years including commercial sites for conversion. Management Plan to include inclu- sionary zoning and expand expedited Develop a marketing and communications Develop a cross -agency strategy to permit review process for all affordable plan. consider other public facilities. projects. Employ a housing counselor. Identify and vet funding sources to reinstate Housing Trust Fund (HTF). Permit guest houses as rental units. Expand and enhance educational Revise the LDC to include a smart code programs to that makes it easier to create mixed- ■ Explain housing affordability income developments. ■ Explain cost burden Identify strategic opportunity sites for density increases such as the ■ Assist residents (renters and homeowners) Bayshore Gateway Triangle in household budgeting. Community Development Area. Create an expedited and/or concurrent comprehensive zoning plan approval process. Offer administrative approvals for certain applications. Medium Term Implement an inclusionary zoning program. Plan for additional increased density in Continue to refine and update affordable certain activity centers with the provi- housing inventory. 3 to 5 years Implement an expanded fee waiver/ sion of mixed -income housing. deferral program. Update and refresh the marketing and Add at -large Board of County Commis- communications plan as needed. Fund HTF to take advantage of other sioners members and/or reduce the financing vehicles (LIHTC, AHP, etc.) to super -majority rule. Update and refresh educational tools and support affordable housing development. programming as needed. Develop a process for commercial -to- Review and refine resources and tools residential conversions. available to the housing counselor. Long Term Conduct an annual review of HTF levels Continuously review and monitor the Continuously review and monitor affordable and report on fund expenditures. LDC and revisions, strategic opportu- housing inventory, marketing and com- 5 to 10+ years nity sites, and updated comprehensive munications plan, and educational tools and Adjust the inclusionary zoning program to zoning plan approval process to ensure programming, as well as resources and tools balance the needs of residents with those that the desired goal of increasing the available to the housing counselor, to ensure of developers and the current market. availability of affordable housing is that the goal of increasing the availability of Continuously review and monitor inclusion- being met. affordable housing is being met. ary zoning program, expanded fee waiver/ deferral program, and commercial -to - residential conversions process to ensure that the goal of increasing the availibility of affordable housing is being met. 38 A ULI Advisory Services Panel Report Appendix 13: Examples of County Housing Initiatives Private funding for housing development and services: Helping low-income families access opportunity neighbor - Santa Clara County, California (www.housingtrustsv.org/) hoods: King County, Washington (https://www.kcha.org/ Mobilizing owners and resources to preserve existing about/education/) affordable units: Cook County, Illinois (www.preservation- Inclusionary zoning: Palm Beach County, Florida (https:// compact.org/) Utilizing publicly controlled real estate to support mixed - income development: Arlington County, Virginia (https:// projects.arlingtonva.us/plans-studies/land-use/public- land/) uIi.org/larson-policy-awards/robert-c-Iarson-award- f i nalists-palm -beach -county-fIorida/) Collier County, Florida, January 29—February 3, 2017 39 Appendix C: City of Austin, 2014 Robert C. Larson Policy Leadership Award Winner - W - ROBERT C. LARSON HOUSING POLICY LEADERSHIP AWARDS 2014 WINNER ORGANIZATION City of Austin, Texas YEAR OF IMPLEMENTATION 2000 AFFORDABILITY 100 percent of units affordable to households at or below 80 percent of median family income (MFI), with 12 percent serving house- holds at 30-50 percent of MFI NUMBER OF UNITS PRODUCED 18,406 WEBSITE http:11housi ngworksaustin.org/ www.austintexas.gov/department/ imagineaustin Austin, Texas, has adopted a multifaceted approach to address the challenges of providing affordable housing in the vibrant and steadily growing city. Outstanding programs include a voter -approved bond program and a city ordinance to incentivize the development of affordable housing. These efforts have yielded 18,406 units since 2000. Austin (pop. 885,000), the capital of Texas, is a national leader in job creation, education, and research, and offers residents a high quality of life with an array of recreational and cultural amenities. Over the past two decades, in the face of rapid and steady population growth attracted to the city, Austin has also encountered corresponding increases in residential rents and home prices. To overcome the resulting squeeze on affordable housing for low-income households, Austin has pursued a multifaceted package of housing programs. These tools include the Housing Trust Fund, the Housing Bond Program, developer incentives, public/private partnerships, and impact statements. • Housing Trust Fund (2000). Since 2000, the Austin City Council has ® directed $8.8 million in local funds to the Housing Trust Fund (HTF). Urban Land The city dedicates to the fund 40 percent of incremental tax revenues Insfitiitp derived from private sector developments built on designated city - Terwilliger Center tar Housing owned property. 40 A ULI Advisory Services Panel Report Housing Bond Program (2006). When 63 percent of voters approved an allocation of $55 million, Austin for the first time in its history used general obligation bond funding for affordable housing. Through May 2012, the Housing Bond Program had created or retained 3,055 housing units, of which 73 percent are affordable to households earning 30 to 50 percent of MR. DEVELOPER INCENTIVES • S.M.A.R.T. HousingTM (2000). S.M.A.R.T Housing is an incentive program designed to encourage accessible, mixed -income development by providing development fee waivers and an expedited review process for developers who set aside 10 percent of housing units as affordable (S.M.A.R.T. stands for Safe, Mixed -income, Accessible, Reasonably priced, and Transit oriented.) Units must also meet the Austin Energy Green Building Program minimum energy efficiency rating. The program has produced 15,351 units affordable to households earning 80 percent of MFI or less. Vertical Mixed Use (2007). Commercial design standards provide a density bonus and parking standards exemptions in exchange for 10 percent of housing units in mixed -use developments being designated as affordable. These units must be maintained as affordable for 40 years for rental, and 99 years for ownership. The program has produced 41 units to date. University Neighborhood Overlay (2004). A density bonus and entitlements are provided to developers who set aside housing as affordable in the University of Texas at Austin campus area. Two tiers of affordability are required-10 percent of units for households earning at or below 80 percent of MR, and 10 percent of units for households at or below 65 percent of MR. To date, 117 units have been constructed at 50 percent of MR, ten at 65 percent of MR, and 357 units at 80 percent of MR. • The Downtown Density Bonus Program (2013) and the East Riverside Corridor Program (2013). Height -density bonus programs encourage production of affordable "Because of GO Bond funding, the City of Austin has reaped direct and indirect benefits including increased income (through wages), increased local taxes (both property and sales), and increased local jobs." Betsy Spencer Director, City of Austin Neighborhood Housing and Community Development Collier County, Florida, January 29—February 3, 2017 41 "Austin's commitment to providing affordable housing is strong, and our citizens expect the City of Austin to take action on this critical issue. I believe Austin's affordable housing bond votes were successful in 2006 and 2013 because Austinites wanted to see affordable housing in all parts of our city and believe we all benefit from providing affordable housing for low income families." housing in downtown Austin and in a neighborhood recommended for a future high -capacity transit route. Transit -Oriented Development (2009). Affordable housing goals have been established through individual station -area plans for areas within a half mile of the Capital Metro commuter rail stations. The overall goal is for 25 percent of all new housing units in the transit -oriented development areas to be occupied by households earning at or below 80 percent of MFI for homeownership or at or below 60 percent of MFI for rental. PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS • Robert Mueller Municipal Airport Redevelopment (1996-present). In a key public/private partnership for the city, the Mueller development when complete will have about 1,200 housing units affordable for households earning at or below 80 percent of Austin's MFI for ownership and 60 percent of MFI for rental. • Private Developer Agreements —Case by Case. The city continues to negotiate the inclusion of affordable housing in development agreements with market -rate developers to bring affordability into developments that otherwise would be unaffordable to low- and moderate - income households. These units must remain affordable through 2020. IMPACT STATEMENTS • Affordability Impact Statements (2000). Required by Austin's S.M.A.R.T HousingTM ordinance, an affordability impact statement (AIS) is prepared by a city staff member for all proposed city code amendments, ordinances, and other proposed changes to identify any potential impacts on housing affordability. To date, Austin has issued more than 150 affordability impact statements. Austin's multifaceted approach to meeting the city's need for Mandy DeMayo affordable housing —from zoning to streamlining development HousingWorks Austin approvals, transit, and green construction —provides an Austin, Texas effective way to consider housing needs in a variety of contexts. While individual programs have an impact, it is the combination of tools that is most powerful, reflecting commit- ted leadership from the city as well as the willingness of Austin residents to step up and vote for bonds for affordable housing. For more information about the Terwilliger Center Awards,see www.uli.org/terwilligeraward. 42 A ULI Advisory Services Panel Report About the Panel Philip Payne Panel Chair Charlotte, North Carolina For more than 25 years, Payne's primary focus has been the development, acquisition, rehabilitation, and manage- ment of middle market (workforce) multifamily housing. During his career, Payne has been involved in more than $4 billion in multifamily related transactions. Payne is currently the chief executive officer of Ginkgo Residential, which was formed in July 2010. Ginkgo provides property management services for multifamily properties in the southeastern United States and is actively involved in the acquisition and substantial rehabilitation of middle market multifamily properties. He is a principal in Ginkgo Investment Company, which was formed in July 2013 and which invests in multifamily properties in the southeastern United States. From 2007 to 2010, Payne served as the CEO of Babcock & Brown Residential. Before joining Babcock & Brown Residential, he was the chair of BNP Residential Properties Trust, a publicly traded real estate investment trust that was acquired by Babcock & Brown Ltd. —a publicly traded Australian investment bank —in February 2007. In addition to his duties at Ginkgo, Payne is a member of the board of directors of Ashford Hospitality Trust, a New York Stock Exchange —listed real estate investment trust that is focused on the hospitality industry. Payne is a trustee and governor of the ULI. He is a mem- ber of ULI's Responsible Property Investing Council (found- ing chair); is a former cochair of the Institute's Climate, Land Use, and Energy Committee; and currently serves as a member of the advisory board for ULI's Center for Sustainability. He is a member of the National Multifamily Housing Council. Payne received a BS and a JD degree from the College of William & Mary in Virginia. He has written for various pub- lications and spoken at numerous conferences on a variety of topics including real estate investment trusts, securi- ties regulations, finance, workforce housing, responsible property investing, sustainability, and resilience. Hilary Chapman Washington, D.C. Chapman is the housing program manager for the Met- ropolitan Washington Council of Governments (COG). At COG, Chapman collaborates with regional leaders to solve the challenges of homelessness and affordable housing and provides research and analysis to support local hous- ing policy and practice using a regional solutions -based framework. As the lead staff person for two technical committees on housing and homelessness, Chapman collaborates with COG's other departments to integrate housing consider- ations into related fields of health, transportation, and the environment. In her role as lead staff person for the Home- less Services Committee, she helps coordinate the annual regional homeless enumeration that takes place during the last week of January each year, and she is the principal author of the committee's findings, "Homelessness in Metropolitan Washington." Chapman collaborates with COG's housing and planning partners, serving as an advisory board member for the Northern Virginia Affordable Housing Alliance, a participant and convener of the Greater Washington Housing Leaders Group, and a planning member for the Housing Association Collier County, Florida, January 29—February 3, 2017 43 of Nonprofit Developers' annual meeting. She participated in the ULI Washington's Regional Land Use Leadership Institute and is active in ULI's Housing Initiative Council. She also volunteers weekly at a program site in the District of Columbia with the Homeless Children's Playtime Project. Before joining COG, Chapman spent nearly a decade as an affordable housing developer, working with public housing authorities nationally primarily through the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's HOPE VI program to redevelop its most distressed housing units. She had direct responsibility for the construction of more than 250 afford- able housing units and the planning and financing of more than 1,000 more. She also served the government of the District of Columbia as a Capital City Fellow. Chapman holds a master's degree in city planning from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and an under- graduate degree in sociology from the College of William and Mary in Virginia. Ian Colgan Oklahoma City, Oklahoma Colgan is the assistant executive director of the Oklahoma City Housing Authority, one of the largest public housing authorities in the country with 3,100 public housing units and more than 4,000 housing choice vouchers. Colgan leads all real estate development, planning, and policy initiatives for the authority. He was previously the assistant planning director for Oklahoma City, where he spearheaded the production of the city's Comprehensive Plan, Downtown Planning Framework, and several commercial district plans, as well as the creation of two new tax increment finance districts. Colgan was also formerly principal with Development Concepts Inc., a redevelopment consulting firm that is based in Indianapolis, Indiana, where he prepared market - based studies and redevelopment plans for communities throughout the Midwest and Southeast. Colgan holds a master's degree in urban planning from the University of Washington, a master's degree in business administration from Anderson University, and a bachelor's degree from Kalamazoo College. He has been a member of ULI since 2012 and participates on the Urban Revitaliza- tion Product Council. JoAnne Fiebe Tampa, Flodda Fiebe is a research faculty member and adjunct instruc- tor at the Florida Center for Community Design and Research —a statewide research center at the University of South Florida's School of Architecture and Community Design. Through her work at the Florida Center, Fiebe provides design expertise, performs applied research, and manages community engagement programs to address urban challenges related to the built environment. Fiebe has 13 years of experience in both the public and private sectors while managing a range of urban design and planning projects. Before coming to the Florida Center, she worked for the Fairfax County Office of Community Revitalization on long-range planning, economic develop- ment, and policy for transit -oriented development districts in the Washington, D.C., metro area. Her previous experi- ence included managing entitlements for large residential and mixed -use projects at several development firms. For the past seven years, she has served on the board of a nonprofit urban design collaborative, the Urban Char- rette, which cultivates knowledge of leading urban design practices to build vibrant cities. She also teaches graduate courses at the University of South Florida about city plan- ning and sustainable urban development. Fiebe earned her degrees in architecture from the Uni- versity of Miami and a master's of urban and community design from the University of South Florida, where she also worked at the Center for Urban Transportation Research and coauthored a study on transit and bicycle lanes. She has been published in the Transportation Research Board and in the National Civic Review, and her research was cited in the NACTO Urban Street Design Guide. In her career, Fiebe has led more than 20 public planning projects including over a dozen community engagement 44 A ULI Advisory Services Panel Report charrettes. She participated in ULI's Regional Land Use and Leadership Institute and was a resource team member for two Mayor's Institute for City Design programs. She is a member of the American Planning Association and the Urban Land Institute, is LEED accredited, and is a certified charrette planner. Lacy McManus New Orleans, Louisiana As the director of program development for Greater New Orleans (GNO) Inc. —the economic development alli- ance for the ten -parish New Orleans region —McManus is responsible for relationships and for the coordination between product and business development. McManus has positioned the organization's workforce and environ- mental and resilience initiatives as catalysts for wealth generation in southeast Louisiana. In this role, she acts as a liaison between GNO Inc. and private philanthropies, business community stakeholders, government agencies, and nonprofit partners to ensure that GNO Inc.'s programs create a thriving regional economy. Specifically, McManus oversees GNO Inc.'s Coalition for Coastal Resilience and Economy, a business -led advocacy campaign for holistic coastal restoration in south Louisi- ana. She also coordinates GNO's workforce development programs, including an award -winning outreach series to local educators, as well as ongoing engagements with regional higher -education institutions. In 2015, she worked with the state of Louisiana and New Orleans to bring in more than $233 million in resilience funds to the region through the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban De- velopment's National Disaster Resilience Competition. On the federal front, McManus serves on GNO's policy team advancing reauthorization of the National Flood Insur- ance Program through the Coalition for Sustainable Flood Insurance. She also represents GNO on the Housing NOLA Leadership Team and CONNECT Coalition. Before joining the GNO staff, McManus was the special initiatives manager with the nonprofit organization the Center for Planning Excellence, where she oversaw an innovative transportation, land use, and housing policy and advocacy campaign. She has branding and communica- tions experience from several years living and working abroad in both Auroville, India, and in Paris, France. She is an active member of the Junior League of New Orleans, a board member of the public transit advocacy organiza- tion RIDE New Orleans, an alumna of the 2016 Emerging Philanthropist of New Orleans class, and a lead mentor to entrepreneurs in the Propeller small business incubator. McManus holds a bachelor's degree from the University of Georgia's Grady School of Journalism, a master's degree in global communications from the American University of Paris, and a master's degree in business administration from Tulane University. John Orfield Dallas, Texas Orfield is both the product and a proponent of the collaborative style that BOKA Powell exemplifies. The 40-year-old planning and design firm, which is based in Dallas, specializes in corporate and commercial office, higher education, hospitality, urban living, and senior living. A LEED-accredited professional, Orfield is an expert in urban planning and sustainability. His 35 years of design experience includes landmark workplace, academic, luxury hotel, and residential projects across the United States and Mexico. Growing up in an artistically inclined family, Orfield devel- oped an interest in exploring the kinship between archi- tecture, film, and dance —art forms he sees as related in their portrayal of human experience moving through space and time. He has sought out collaborative environments or created them on the spot in design firms and universi- ties from New York to Indianapolis to Mexico City. Orfield considers every project a partnership, not only between the architect and the client, but also with the site itself. He sees this contextual approach as one reason there is no recognizable BOKA Powell "style" —only spaces that Collier County, Florida, January 29—February 3, 2017 45 benefit their surroundings as the result of a very intentional design process. Orfield's recent projects include major projects for South- west Airlines, including the carrier's corporate headquar- ters master plan, the 1.1 million -square -foot "Wings" Office Building, the Flight Training Center and Garage, and the 500,000-square-foot Training and Operations Support Center at Dallas's Love Field. Other projects include the Texas A&M West Campus student housing complex, which is designed to accommodate 4,000 students in College Station, Texas; the Venue at the Ballpark, which is a 241- unit apartment complex overlooking the Birmingham Bar- ons ballpark; the Hotel Ajax, which is a boutique hotel and condominium project in Telluride, Colorado; and multiple corporate and commercial office projects for Hillwood and Cawley Partners in North Texas. Orfield's higher education portfolio includes more than 5.5 million square feet of university architecture, including student housing and academic buildings. He has designed corporate headquarters campuses for Accor, Daimler Chrysler, Mercedes-Benz, and Computer Associates. While a vice-president at Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf Inc., he completed the iconic 400,000-square-foot Eli Lilly Corporate Center in downtown Indianapolis. In 1996, Orfield joined Dallas -based architecture and plan- ning firm HaldemanPowell+Partners. Now known as BOKA Powell, he became a partner and owner in the practice in 1999. Earlier, Orfield was a vice president at Indianapolis - based Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf Inc. from 1988 to 1994. He worked in numerous architectural intern positions in Houston, Texas; New Haven, Connecticut; and New York City, including an undergraduate internship with Mitchell Giurgola. He earned a master's degree in archi- tecture and building design from Columbia University in 1987. He earned his first bachelor's degree in architecture in 1980 and a second bachelor's of architecture in 1982 from Rice University in Houston. A lifelong educator, Orfield was a member of the fac- ulty of the University of Houston College of Architecture from 1984 to 1986, where he earned the Excellence in Teaching award. He also held an appointment as a visiting professor at the Universidad de las Americas in Puebla, Mexico, from 1994 to 1995. Cassie Wright Denver, Colorado Wright is the project manager for Urban Ventures LLC, a real estate company that is dedicated to creating healthy, sustainable communities. In her position, Wright works on all aspects of real estate development: from land acquisi- tion to project construction. She tests the financial feasibil- ity of projects, actively participates in the site planning and design processes, develops marketing and sales related materials, and closely interacts with project partners. In addition, Wright consults on real estate projects that focus on the relationship between the built environment and healthy living. In this role, she researches and implements best practices and health -based programming to foster community development that promotes social cohesion and positive wellbeing. Currently, Wright is involved with the land development of Aria Denver, a 17.5-acre, mixed -use, mixed -income project that will include more than 450 units and a commercial component. Upon completion, Aria Denver will promote healthy living with community gardens, production farms, a food -producing greenhouse, pocket parks, outdoor fitness equipment, and pathways integrated into the site. Aria Denver is part of Cultivate Health, a partnership among neighboring Regis University, the surrounding neighbor- hoods, and more than a dozen nonprofit organizations. Funded in large part by the Colorado Health Foundation, Cultivate Health is providing infrastructure enhancements and programming that promote an active lifestyle, increase access to healthy food, and offer integrated health services. Wright is co -manager of the Colorado Health Foundation grant and is managing the implementation of three major infrastructure projects (i.e., production farms, improved bicycle facilities, and neighborhood wellness loop) that are included in the Cultivate Health initiative. 46 A ULI Advisory Services Panel Report Wright is also actively working on the Aria Cohousing proj- ect. Cohousing communities are intentional, collaborative neighborhoods that combine private homes and shared spaces. In cohousing, residents actively participate in the design and operation of their neighborhoods while sharing common facilities and good connections with neighbors. Aria Cohousing is the redevelopment of a 35,000-square- foot convent into 28 condominium units and shared community spaces including a community dining room, kitchen, multipurpose room, guest room, and sunroom. Finally, Wright is project manager for STEAM on the Platte, a 3.2-acre, mixed -use project in Denver's abandoned, industrial corridor along the Platte River. In its first phase, STEAM will feature the conversion of an existing 65,000-square-foot industrial warehouse into office space and the creation of a courtyard and promenade that con- nects to the river's edge. Wright holds a master's degree in city planning from the University of Pennsylvania and a bachelor's degree in soci- ology and anthropology from St. Olaf College in Northfield, Minnesota. She serves on the nonprofit board for Soul Spring, as well as on the Mile High Connects Advisory Council. Collier County, Florida, January 29—February 3, 2017 47 Urban land Institute 2001 L Street, NW Washington, DC 20036 www.uli.org ® Printed on recycled paper. *I LI Lie] I I IYWI 12 1 Prepared By: Blulynx Solutions Mwi C)#o e-r County Public Services Department Community & Human Services Division Table of Contents ExecutiveSummary.......................................................................................................................................4 ES-05 Executive Summary - 24 CFR 91.200(c), 91.220(b).........................................................................4 TheProcess.................................................................................................................................................15 PR-05 Lead & Responsible Agencies 24 CFR 91.200(b)...........................................................................15 PR-10 Consultation — 91.100, 91.110, 91.200(b), 91.300(b), 91.215(I) and 91.315(I)............................17 PR-15 Citizen Participation — 91.105, 91.115, 91.200(c) and 91.300(c).................................................33 NeedsAssessment......................................................................................................................................42 NA-05 Overview......................................................................................................................................42 NA-10 Housing Needs Assessment - 24 CFR 91.205 (a,b,c)....................................................................42 NA-15 Disproportionately Greater Need: Housing Problems — 91.205(b)(2)........................................54 NA-20 Disproportionately Greater Need: Severe Housing Problems — 91.205 (b)(2) ............................59 NA-25 Disproportionately Greater Need: Housing Cost Burdens — 91.205(b)(2)..................................64 NA-30 Disproportionately Greater Need: Discussion — 91.205(b)(2).....................................................66 NA-35 Public Housing — 91.205(b)..........................................................................................................69 NA-40 Homeless Needs Assessment — 91.205(c)Introduction:..............................................................75 A variety of housing and shelter models are available within the community including emergency shelter (ES), transitional housing (TH), permanent supportive housing (PSH), rapid re -housing (RRH).: ................................................................................................................................................................ 75 NA-45 Non -Homeless Special Needs Assessment - 91.205 (b, d)...........................................................78 NA-50 Non -Housing Community Development Needs — 91.215 (f)....................................................... 80 HousingMarket Analysis............................................................................................................................. 82 MA-05 Overview..................................................................................................................................... 82 MA-10 Number of Housing Units — 91.210(a)&(b)(2).............................................................................82 MA-15 Housing Market Analysis: Cost of Housing - 91.210(a)...............................................................85 MA-20 Housing Market Analysis: Condition of Housing — 91.210(a)......................................................88 Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 1 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) MA-25 Public and Assisted Housing — 91.210(b) MA-30 Homeless Facilities and Services — 91.210(c)....... MA-35 Special Needs Facilities and Services — 91.210(d) 10 95 MA-40 Barriers to Affordable Housing — 91.210(e)..............................................................................100 MA-45 Non -Housing Community Development Assets — 91.215 (f)....................................................102 MA-50 Needs and Market Analysis Discussion.....................................................................................108 MA-60 Broadband Needs of Housing occupied by Low- and Moderate -Income Households - 91.210(a)(4), 91.310(a)(2).....................................................................................................................113 MA-65 Hazard Mitigation - 91.210(a)(5), 91.310(a)(3).........................................................................115 StrategicPlan............................................................................................................................................116 SP-05 Overview.....................................................................................................................................116 SP-10 Geographic Priorities — 91.215(a)(1)..........................................................................................119 SP-25 Priority Needs - 91.215(a)(2).......................................................................................................122 SP-30 Influence of Market Conditions — 91.215(b)..............................................................................130 SP-35 Anticipated Resources - 91.215(a)(4), 91.220(c)(1,2).................................................................131 SP-40 Institutional Delivery Structure — 91.215(k)...............................................................................135 SP-45 Goals Summary — 91.215(a)(4)...................................................................................................141 SP-50 Public Housing Accessibility and Involvement — 91.215(c).........................................................145 SP-55 Barriers to affordable housing — 91.215(h).................................................................................145 SP-60 Homelessness Strategy — 91.215(d)............................................................................................146 SP-65 Lead based paint Hazards — 91.215(i)y.......................................................................................148 SP-70 Anti -Poverty Strategy — 91.215(j)...............................................................................................149 SP-80 Monitoring — 91.230...................................................................................................................149 ExpectedResources..................................................................................................................................151 AP-15 Expected Resources — 91.220(c)(1,2).........................................................................................151 Annual Goals and Objectives..................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 2 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) AP-20 Annual Goals and Objectives......................................................................................................155 Projects.................................................................................................................................................158 AP-35 Projects — 91.220(d)...................................................................................................................158 AP-38 Project Summary........................................................................................................................161 AP-50 Geographic Distribution — 91.220(f)...........................................................................................171 AffordableHousing...............................................................................................................................172 AP-55 Affordable Housing — 91.220(g).................................................................................................172 AP-60 Public Housing — 91.220(h).........................................................................................................173 AP-65 Homeless and Other Special Needs Activities — 91.220(i)..........................................................175 AP-75 Barriers to affordable housing — 91.220(j).................................................................................177 AP-85 Other Actions — 91.220(k)..........................................................................................................177 Program Specific Requirements............................................................................................................181 AP-90 Program Specific Requirements — 91.220(I)(1,2,4)....................................................................181 Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 3 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Executive Summary ES-05 Executive Summary - 24 CFR 91.200(c), 91.220(b) 1. Introduction The 2021-2025 Consolidated Plan for Housing and Community Development provides the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) with information on Collier County's intended uses of funds HUD's Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME), and Emergency Solutions Grants (ESG) programs. The County allocates the annual funding from these programs to public, private, or non-profit parties consistent with HUD program goals and requirements. Below is a list of each of the grant program objectives: ■ CDBG Program: Provide decent housing, creating suitable living environments, and expanding economic opportunities principally for low- and moderate -income persons. ■ HOME Program: Provides funding for a wide range of activities including building, buying, and/or rehabilitating affordable housing for rent or homeownership or providing direct rental assistance to low-income people. ■ ESG Program: ESG funds improve the number and quality of emergency shelters for homeless individuals and families, help operate shelters, provide essential services to shelter residents, rapidly rehouse homeless individuals and families, and prevent families and individuals from becoming homeless. The County submits the Consolidated Plan to HUD every five years and has a program year beginning October 1 and ending September 30. The County's Annual Action provide a concise summary of the actions, activities, and specific federal and nonfederal resources that will be used each year to address the priority needs and goals identified in the Consolidated Plan. The County has identified the following Goals to be addressed over the 2021-2025 Consolidated Plan period and during the 2021 Annual Action Plan: Goal # Goal Name 1 Housing Affordability 2 Homelessness & Homelessness Prevention 3 Public Facilities 4 Public Infrastructure Improvements 5 Public Services 6 Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Choice 7 Program Administration and Planning Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 4 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Community Profile and Needs The Collier County Consolidated Plan relies upon multiple forms of qualitative and quantitative data as well as community input in order to identify housing, homelessness, and community development needs and trends. This picture of need is the basis of the proposed objectives and outcomes for the 2021 Consolidated Plan. In addition to the US Census, updated American Community Survey (ACS) data and community surveys that provides the foundation for development of the document, the Cities of Naples, Everglades, and Marco Island built on the work of several active committees and recent studies that addressed housing, homeless and community development. The assessment was also informed by additional consultations with city officials and other important stakeholders such as the Affordable Housing Advisory Committee, United Way of Collier County, and the Collier County Homeless Coalition. In 2020, the County's economy has continued to diversify and improve, while at the same time leaving many in the community still struggling to find jobs with wages to cover increasing housing costs. There is a significant number of households who cannot meet the basic needs for food, shelter, medical care, and transportation. In addition, there are a growing number of seniors, persons with disabilities, and others who are unable to work. These factors, combined with a very tight housing market, have resulted in many households paying more than they can afford, and a growing number of persons experiencing homelessness. It is important to note that the impacts of the COVID-19 are too recent to be reflected in the 2020 and 2019 ACS data used for the analysis provided below. Population Growth As noted in the 2019 Census American Community Survey, Collier County, Florida had a total population of 384,902 of which 195,189 or 50.7% are female and 189,713 or 49.2% are males when compared to 2010, County's population was 322,472 with 162,493 or 50.3% of females and 159,979 or 49.6% of males. Therefore, reflecting a 19.3% population increase in the Collier County. Population grew to 21,812 in Naples, 7.32% increase since 2010. The population also increased in Marco Island to 17,834, a 5.14% increase since 2010. Last, Everglades City's population decreased to 190, a 41.89% decrease since 2010. Accounting for population growth over the last 10 years, Collier County is expected to continue to grow over time. Age Distribution The population of Collier County is aging. According to ACS, in 2010 there were 70,289 people aged 60 to 75 and this grew to 87,042 in 2019. For the same period, there were 193,930 people under the age of 55 in 2010, which has also risen to 205,929 in 2019. Racial and Ethnic Composition Collier County is becoming increasingly racially and ethnically diverse. Latino residents are the fastest growing population, representing 28.6% of the population in the County in 2019. While 11.5% of the population is non -white comprised of 28,704 African Americans, 6,961 Asians, 1,768 American Indian and Alaska Natives, and 6,414 multi -racial persons. Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 5 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Household Composition As of 2019, Collier County has a total of 140,578 households. There were 10,797 households in Naples, 8,379 in Marco Island, and 101 in Everglades City. In Collier County, of the 140,578 total household there were 10,194 single female -headed households and 4,417 single male -headed households. There has also been a significant increase in nonfamily households 43,299 which now make up 30.8% of all households as compared to 2010 which had 37,996 or 32.12%. The largest growth in household type is non -family households which increased 13.95% between 2010 and 2019. In 2019, the average household size is 2.71 in Collier County. Multigenerational living is defined as residing in a home with three or more generations. According to Generations United, the past ten years have seen a remarkably large leap in multigenerational living, from 7% of Americans 2011 to 26% of Americans in 2021. As noted in the 2010 Census, Collier County had a total of 118,258 households of which 2.6% (3,022)% were living in multigenerational households. This data is collected during the decennial census every ten years and this data is the most recent data available. MULTIGENERATIONAL HOUSEHOLDS Label Estimate Percent Multigenerational Households 3,022 2.6% Other Households 115,236 97.4% TOTAL 1181258 100% Source: 2010 American Community Survey, 2010: ACS 1-Year Estimates Detailed Tables Income and Poverty According to 2019 ACS, the median income of households in Collier County, Florida was $76,025. An estimated 4.8% of households had income below $10,000 a year and 13.1% had income over $200,000 or more. The Median Household Income for Collier County is higher than the US ($65,712) and our northern county, Lee County ($57,832). While income has risen slightly there remain many low wage jobs and data has shown this contributes to financial instability as evidenced by other indicators: 6.5% or 9,164 residents receive food stamp benefits (SNAP), 61% of students are eligible for free and reduced lunch. In 2019, 48,825 individuals in Collier County had incomes below 125 % of the poverty levels as indicated in the chart below. a� Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 6 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) 2019 FEDERAL POVERTY GUIDELINES (FPG) ANNUAL & MONTHLY INCOME LEVELS FROM 100% to 250% FAMILY FPG (100%) 125 % of FPG 150 % of FPG 175 % of FPG 185 % of FPG 200 % of FPG 235 /o of FPG 250 % of FPG SIZE YEAR MONTH YEAR MONTH YEAR MONTH YEAR MONTH YEAR MONTH YEAR MONTH YEAR MONTH YEAR MONTH 1 $12,490 $1,041 $15,613 $1,301 $18,735 $1,561 $21,858 $1,822 $23,107 $1,926 $24,980 $2,082 S29,352 $2,446 S31,225 $2,602 2 $16,910 $1,409 $21,138 $1,762 $25,365 $2,114 $29,593 $2,466 $31,284 $2,607 $33,820 $2,818 $39,739 $3,312 $42.275 $3,523 3 $21,330 $1,77B $26,663 $2,222 $31.995 $2,666 $37,328 $3,111 $39,461 $3,288 $42.660 $3,555 $50,126 $4,177 $53.326 $4,444 4 $25,750 $2,146 $32,188 $2,682 $38,625 $3.219 $45.063 $3,755 $47,638 $3.970 $51.500 $4,292 $60,513 $5 043 $64.375 $5,365 5 $30.170 $2,514 $37,713 $3,143 $45,255 $3,771 $52.798 $4,400 $55,815 $4,651 $60,340 $5,028 $70.900 $5.908 $75 425 $6,285 6 $34.590 $2,883 $43,238 $3,603 $51.885 S4,324 $60.533 $5.044 $63.992 $5.333 $69.180 $5,765 $81.287 $6.774 $86.475 $7,206 7 $39.010 $3,251 $48.763 S4,064 $58.515 $4,876 $68.268 $5.689 $72.169 $6.014 $78,020 $6,502 $91.674 $7,(W $97,525 $8.127 8 $43.430 $3,619 $54,288 $4,524 $65,145 $5.429 $76,003 $6.334 $80.346 $6,696 $86.860 $7,238 $102,061 $8.505 $108.576 $9.048 $4.420 $368 $5,525 $460 $6,630 $553 $7,735 $645 $8.177 $681 $8.840 $737 $10,387 $866 $11.050 $921 'For family units over 8, add the amount shown for each additional member. Source: https:Hdch.georgia.gov/document/document/2019-federal-poverty-guidelines/download Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) fl Map L Low. 7 Low -Mod Block Groups Collier County, Florida Snurcr- HUD C PD Mapping Tool, hags-flcgis_hiid.gnvjcpdinaps/ Persons with Disabilities According to the 2019 ACS, of the total Collier County population of 384,902 there were 47,569 people, or 12.3%, living with one or more disabilities. The highest reported disabilities include ambulatory at 6.3%, cognitive at 3.9%, and difficulty with independent living 5.2%. Persons Experiencing Homelessness The 2021 Point -in -Time Count (PIT) identified 568 people in Collier County experiencing homelessness, a 5.8% decrease from 2020. Over 25% of this population, or 144 individuals, met HUD's definition of unsheltered. As a disclaimer, these numbers may be under reported due to COVID. The 2021 PIT count also found that 169 persons experiencing homelessness were seriously mentally ill, 198 reported substance abuse, 34 were veterans, 49 were seniors, and 49 were families with comprised of adults and 109 children. For FY 2021, Collier County reported that 568 unduplicated individuals who were homeless received human services from one or more agencies. During the 2020-2021 school year, the Collier County public school reported 805 Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 8 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) homeless youth, includes students who are staying with friends or family. The reported number includes 183 homeless youth (16 and older) who were unaccompanied. Persons with Special Needs who are not Homeless. Limited new data exists specific to non -homeless special needs populations in Collier County. There are numerous sub -populations in this community. Of those, there are some that have both enough and unique housing and service needs that warrant identification. Those include the following: families with children, seniors, ex -offenders, people with HIV/AIDS, victims of domestic violence, people with drug and alcohol addictions, people who are evicted or foreclosed, people with physical and mental disabilities, veterans, youth and young adults, and youth aging out of foster care. Employment and Economy Economic conditions in Collier County have recovered significantly in the past decade, and the County has emerged as a more diversified economy than it was before the Great Recession. The number of jobs has grown steadily during the decade, and unemployment rates have remained relatively low during recent years (below 3%). Wages have slightly risen 1.9% in the County as reflected in the household earnings chart below: Household Earnings 2017-2019 Collier County, Florida 2017 2018 2019 $40,622.00 $40,892.00 $41,415.00 Source: Census, ACS Estimates 2017-2019, data.census.gov As of 2019, there were 166,353 (50.7%) persons in the labor force 16 years and older and 161,557 (49.3%) not in the labor force. According to 2019 ACS estimates, 4,929 or 1.5% of the total population was unemployed. While there have been recent and significant job losses as a result of COVID-19, it is unclear how sustained these job losses will be as social distancing measures diminish. It is apparent however that many people with limited incomes are experiencing financial instability as a result of recent events. Housing Units and Tenure According to 2019 ACS estimates, the County had a total of 222,289 housing units. The majority of the housing units are single family 1-unit detached unit structures at 90,552 (40.7%) of the total units. The remainder consisting of 1-unit, attached at 15,145 (6.8%), 2-9 multi -family units at 44,174 (20.1%), 10-20 multi -family units at 59,697 (26.9%) and a small share of mobile/manufactured homes at 12,499 (5.6%) of the housing units. Housing Cost Burden Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 9 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) While wages and incomes have continued to rise in recent years, they have not kept pace with the cost of both owner and rental housing in Collier County. From 2010 to 2019, Median Household Income increased 44%from 2010 at $52,730 to 2019 at $76,025. Housing costs in the county area have risen more sharply since 2010, especially in recent years. According to 2019 ACS estimates, the County's median home prices have increased by 44.8% between 2010 and 2019, reaching $370,000. The County's median gross rental rates have also increased substantially faster than incomes and the home values. Between 2010 and 2019, the median rental rate rose to 48.3% from $942 in 2010 to $1,397 in 2019. As a result, many households pay more for housing than is affordable, or are unable to afford any housing. Households paying more than 30% of household income are considered to have a 'housing cost burden'. According to 2019 ACS, a total of 19,977 of renters in Collier County have cost burdens greater than 30% of their income, while a total of 14,910 of homeowners have cost burdens greater than 30% but less than 50% of their income. HUD Comprehensive Housing Affordable Strategy (CHAS) (2011-2015) data estimates the County had a total of 13,977 renter households and 14,154 of owner households spent more than 30% of their income on housing costs. Housing Conditions and Lead Based Paint The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Report on the National Survey of Lead -Based Paint in Housing released in 1995 found that 83% of the nation's privately owned housing units built before 1980 had lead -based paint somewhere in the building. The study suggests that older homes are more likely to have lead -based paint than newer homes. According to the 2019 ACS, approximately 17% (37,852) of the total housing units were built prior to 1980 may be at risk of containing lead -based paint. Lead -based paint numbers are estimated since census data is not broken out annually. Since lead -based paint was outlawed in 1978 and census data is not available annually, all housing built after 1980 was excluded from the potential pool of housing potentially contaminated with lead -based paint. Despite the age of the housing stock, the physical condition of the housing in Collier County is generally good, as there are relatively few housing units (1,715) in the area that are considered substandard according to HUD. Based on input received during provider and public consultations, units available to low-income residents tend to have more significant issues, and because of the scarcity of affordable low-income housing, residents are reluctant to raise their concerns for fear of losing the housing. 2. Summary of the objectives and outcomes identified in the Plan Needs Assessment Overview During the development of the Consolidated Plan, seven priority needs were identified. The priority needs and associated goals for 2021-2025 are summarized below: 1. Housing Affordability • New Construction, Rehabilitation, or Acquisition of Housing for Homeownership • New Construction, Rehabilitation, or Acquisition of Housing for Rental Housing Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 10 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) • Homebuyer Assistance • CH DO Set -Aside • Tenant Based Rental Assistance 2. Homelessness & Homelessness Prevention • Support Emergency Housing and Services for the Homeless • HMIS Support • Provide Rapid Re -Housing and Homelessness Prevention 3. Public Facilities • Improve Public Facilities • Improve Other Facilities 4. Public Infrastructure Improvements • Public Infrastructure Improvements S. Public Services • Provide Public Service 6. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Choice • Provide assistance and education to homebuyers. 7. Program Administration and Planning • Program Administration 3. Evaluation of past performance Each year, Collier County reports its progress in meeting the five-year and annual goals in the Consolidated Annual Performance Evaluation Report (CAPER). Listed below are some of the goals and accomplishments in the County's Fiscal Year (FY) 2019 CAPER. The County successfully utilized CDBG, HOME, and ESG funds by increasing housing assistance for low- and moderate -income persons and allocating funds to public infrastructure and facility improvements, public services to local non-profit organizations to provide essential social services for the homeless, LMI persons, and non -homeless special needs population, affordable housing initiative and at -risk of homelessness activities. Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 11 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) For FY2020, the fourth year of the Consolidated Plan period, Collier County made significant strides in meeting the strategic plan objectives. Collier County expended an estimated $2,669,701.85 in CDBG, HOME, and ESG funding on activities meeting its strategic plan goals and assisted approximately 391 persons through public services, land acquisition to benefit 51 households with future affordable housing, public facilities and infrastructure projects also had an area wide benefit of over 24,587 low -moderate persons in the County. 4. Summary of citizen participation process and consultation process During the preparation of Collier County's FY2021-2025 Consolidated Plan and FY2021 Action Plan, a Public Hearing was held on May 3, 2021 to obtain the specific housing and related services needs for the County. All comments received have been included in this Consolidated Plan. The following methods were used to obtain public and private input: • Two needs assessment meetings were held on February 17, 2021 to obtain the specific housing and related services needs for the County. • A 30-day comment period was held from April 30, 2021 through May 31, 2021 for the public to review and provide comments on the Annual Action Plan. The plan was available for review in hard copy at the County's Community and Human Services Division and on the County's website at https://www.colliercountVfl.gov/your-government/divisions-a- e/community-and-human-services 5. Summary of public comments Below are the summary comments received during the needs assessment meeting. Question 1. What do you believe are the greatest community development needs in the area? Where are these needs most acute? Responses: • Affordable Housing is a large need • There is a deferred maintenance of affordable housing due to past Hurricane Irma • High need for affordable housing in Immokalee • Habitat for Humanity is a proponent affordable housing • There is a high need for senior housing and workforce housing • Access to affordable housing across the spectrum • There are no county incentives for affordable housing • Rural neighborhoods have a high need for rental for low-income households • Land development cost are extraordinarily high • Habitat builds 90-100 per year but still have a waiting list • Other needs include food deserts, low access to transportation, emergency beds and transitional shelters, and not enough housing Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 12 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) • Bulk of the economy is in the coastal areas in Collier. • Rural areas have several low wages jobs • Majority of income for Collier County residents earn less than $35,000 a year. • 2-bedroom rent is about $1,500 per month • Median home prices in Collier are $550,000 • There is a high influx of out of state persons using up affordable rental property. Question 2 What do you believe are the greatest fair and affordable housing needs in the area? Where is this housing most needed? • The greatest need is access to housing under $400,000. • Lots of development of Condo's that are under $300,000 with HOAs which makes it unaffordable. • Strong coalition of nonprofit network • Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance is currently building 128 affordable units. Question 3. Do area residents of similar incomes generally have the same range of housing options? No, there are not good housing options for low wage earners. Low wage earners may have to rent a room or substandard units. Question 4. Are there any barriers other than income/savings that might limit housing choices? Primary barrier is affordability, clients have to decide where to live. Question S. Are public resources (e.g., parks, schools, roads, police & fire services, etc.) invested evenly throughout all neighborhoods? • County has put in sufficient efforts to ensuring equal resources like parks in all areas. • There is a greater focus on public resources available throughout the County. • 80% of Collier is restricted by wetlands. • Rural Neighborhood, a nonprofit organization, has acquired affordable rental housing and will build 400-unit apartment complex. Other Comments: Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 13 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) The issue of persons who are not legal remains with any funds appropriated from Collier County since there was an Executive Summary passed by the BCC for housing programs back in 2016 that stated in Collier funds would be used for U.S. citizens and registered aliens. 6. Summary of comments or views not accepted and the reasons for not accepting them. All comments were accepted. 7. Summary In summary, the Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plan have been developed with community input and reflect the needs of the County. Many components of the Consolidated Plan were built on prior plans and strategies generated by local input. During the next Five-year Consolidated Plan period the County will continue to utilize CDBG, HOME and ESG funding to address the priority needs of low-income households. Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 14 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) The Process The Consolidated Plan was developed through extensive consultation with partner organizations and other stakeholders, as well as broad input from community members. Several intergovernmental and advisory committees —representing the affordable housing provider, advocates, and other key community stakeholders —played an integral role. The Consolidated Plan also incorporated valuable data and analysis from several recently published reports on demographic, housing, community, and economic development conditions and needs. Service providers also shared their insights through an online survey. Extensive public outreach was conducted to allow other community members to share their insights during the planning process through public hearings, and online surveys. This section summarizes the extensive consultation and citizen outreach conducted. PR-05 Lead & Responsible Agencies 24 CFR 91.200(b) 1. Describe agency/entity responsible for preparing the Consolidated Plan and those responsible for administration of each grant program and funding source The following are the agencies/entities responsible for preparing the Consolidated Plan and those responsible for administration of each grant program and funding source. Agency Role Name Department/Agency CDBG Administrator Collier County Community & Human Services Division HOME Administrator Collier County Community & Human Services Division ESG Administrator Collier County Community & Human Services Division Table 1— Responsible Agencies Narrative The Collier County Community & Human Services Division is the lead agency responsible for the development, administration, and review of the 2021-2025 Consolidated Plan and the 2021 Annual Action Plan. The Division administers Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME), and Emergency Solutions Grants (ESG) funds received from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), and coordinates execution of projects related to the priorities and goals identified in the Consolidated Plan. Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 15 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Consolidated Plan Public Contact Information Kristi Sonntag, Director Community and Human Services Division 3339 East Tamiami Trail Health and Public Services Building H, Room 213 Naples, Florida 34112 Phone: (239) 252-2486 Fax: (239) 252-2638 Email: Kristi.Sonntag@colliercountyfl.gov Website: http://www.colliergov.net/your-government/divisions-a-e/community-and-human- services Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 16 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) PR-10 Consultation — 91.100, 91.110, 91.200(b), 91.300(b), 91.215(I) and 91.315(I) 1. Introduction The County developed an outreach effort to maximize input from a large cross-section of stakeholders. This outreach effort included public meetings, neighborhood meetings, published meeting notices, and a web survey conducted in both English and Spanish. Consultation with the community and affected service providers is a fundamental component of the Consolidated Plan and Action Plan process. Collier County conducted significant consultation with citizens, municipal officials, non-profit agencies, public housing agencies, governmental agencies, and the Continuum of Care in preparing this Plan. The last piece of the stakeholder outreach component involved surveying local broadband and hazard mitigation agencies. Additionally, a total of 536 stakeholders completed surveys inquiring about the community and housing needs throughout the County. The County held two virtual public meetings on February 17, 2021 at 11:00am and 3:00pm through its public participation process prior to the development of the plan and one public meeting to review the draft priorities. These meetings are summarized in the Citizen Participation Section of this plan. Drafts of the plans have been posted on the County webpage. Notices of public meetings and hearings were published in the local newspaper. Stakeholder Focus Groups and Interviews: From February 2021 through April 2021, a series of stakeholder meetings and interviews was conducted to discuss issues and opportunities related to housing and community development needs as well as fair housing issues. Individuals representing government and policy makers, nonprofit organizations, affordable housing providers, and other interested parties were invited to participate to ensure that as many points of view as possible were heard. Over the course of one-on-one interviews and small focus group meetings, approximately five local nonprofit organizations provided their feedback in person. Several meetings were held with the local committees and in other settings. Public presentations of the findings and recommendations from the Needs Assessment, Market Analysis, and Priority and Needs sections were shared at multiple community meetings in February. Community and Agency Surveys: Separate online surveys were developed to gather information about current community conditions and needs. A total of 536 representatives from community agencies and the public responded to the online survey. This survey sought input from housing community development stakeholders and community members for the purposes of identifying priority needs, reviewing, and providing feedback on the County's current priorities, and providing feedback on the housing and community development conditions in Collier County. The agency survey received responses from a range of organizations including city agencies, housing providers, and social service providers and advocate groups. The participating agencies provide social services support to low-income and near -homeless populations to maintain housing and secure available public and private resources. Agencies providing temporary and Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 17 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) transitional housing to at -risk populations like single mothers, victims of domestic abuse, elderly, people with disabilities and/or mental illnesses, etc. were identified and reached out to for information through the survey as well as in-depth interviews. Consolidated Plan Advisory Committee: The Affordable Housing Advisory Committee provided input and feedback during several meetings on current housing and community development conditions, needs, and strategies. Provide a concise summary of the jurisdiction's activities to enhance coordination between public and assisted housing providers and private and governmental health, mental health, and service agencies (91.215(1)). During the development of the Consolidated Plan, the County sought to encourage a high level of public communication and agency consultation in an effort to demonstrate its commitment to identifying priority needs and engaging the participation of citizens, public agencies, and nonprofit organizations in a positive and collaborative manner. A list of stakeholders and affordable housing providers was developed and included public agencies and private nonprofit organizations whose missions included the provision of affordable housing and human services to LMI households and persons. These stakeholders were invited to participate in needs assessment meetings held for the purpose of developing the Consolidated Plan. The list of stakeholders is included in the Citizen Participation Comments section. Based on the public meetings, a set of priorities was established by the County for the next five years as shown in SP- 25 of this document. Describe coordination with the Continuum of Care and efforts to address the needs of homeless persons (particularly chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans, and unaccompanied youth) and persons at risk of homelessness. Collier County staff attends bi-monthly meetings with the Hunger & Homeless Coalition of Collier County and area service providers to enhance the community's comprehensive Continuum of Care system to end homelessness. This dynamic partnership includes collaborative efforts of a variety of community groups, government agencies. The Hunger & Homeless Coalition of Collier County serves as the Lead Agency and has been designated by the CoC as the Collaborative Applicant to apply for the HUD CoC grant on behalf of Collier County's Continuum of Care. The County enhances coordination of public, private, and non-profit housing providers, human service agencies, and social service providers through the following actions: ■ Continues to work with other jurisdictions and the Collier County Housing Authority to prioritize housing needs, provide services, and maximize the use of federal, state, and local funds for affordable housing, community development, and related services. ■ Continues to participate in coordinated efforts for shelter and services assisting homeless individuals and families. Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 18 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) ■ County staff participates in many of the committees that provide direction for 10-year plan to end homelessness. Describe consultation with the Continuum(s) of Care that serves the jurisdiction's area in determining how to allocate ESG funds, develop performance standards and evaluate outcomes, and develop funding, policies, and procedures for the administration of HMIS. The Collier County Hunger and Homeless Coalition (CCHHC) serves as the lead agency for Collier County's Continuum of Care. Members of the Continuum of Care provided input during stakeholder interviews and in the project selection process. The CoC is responsible for designating a Homeless Management Information System (HMIS) and a Lead Agency responsible for its management and has primary responsibility for ensuring that Homeless Management Information System (HMIS) is fully funded with appropriate policies and procedures, which were last updated in 2020. The CoC also works closely Collier County (ESG recipient) to allocate funds and monitor outcomes. 2. Describe Agencies, groups, organizations, and others who participated in the process and describe the jurisdictions consultations with housing, social service agencies and other entities. Individual consultations with members of public and non-profit organizations took place throughout the development of the Consolidated Plan. Additionally, a survey was conducted. Input from these meetings and survey information assisted with the identification of community needs, market conditions, priority needs and the resulting strategic plan. Agency/Group/Organization Able Academy Agency/Group/Organization Children Services Type What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Other — Non -Housing Community Development Needs 1 How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the The organization was consulted through a virtual anticipated outcomes of the Needs Assessment Meeting consultation or areas for improved coordination? Agency/Group/Organization Boys & Girls Club of Collier County 2 Agency/Group/Organization Youth services Type Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 19 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Other — Non -Housing Community Development Needs How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the The organization was consulted through a virtual anticipated outcomes of the Needs Assessment Meeting consultation or areas for improved coordination? Agency/Group/Organization Children's Advocacy Center of Collier County Agency/Group/Organization Youth services Type What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Other — Non -Housing Community Development Needs 3 How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the The organization was consulted through a virtual anticipated outcomes of the Needs Assessment Meeting consultation or areas for improved coordination? Agency/Group/Organization Collier County Housing Authority Agency/Group/Organization Type Housing What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Housing Need Assessment 4 How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the The organization was consulted through a virtual anticipated outcomes of the Needs Assessment Meeting consultation or areas for improved coordination? Agency/Group/Organization Collier County Hunger and Homeless Coalition 5 Agency/Group/Organization Homeless Services Type Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 20 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Other — Non -Housing Community Development Needs How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the The organization was consulted through a virtual anticipated outcomes of the Needs Assessment Meeting consultation or areas for improved coordination? Agency/Group/Organization Collier Resource Center, Inc. Agency/Group/Organization Type Supportive Services What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Other — Non -Housing Community Development Needs 6 How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the The organization was consulted through a virtual anticipated outcomes of the Needs Assessment Meeting consultation or areas for improved coordination? Agency/Group/Organization Collier Senior Resources Agency/Group/Organization Senior Services Type What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Other — Non -Housing Community Development Needs 7 How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the The organization was consulted through a virtual anticipated outcomes of the Needs Assessment Meeting consultation or areas for improved coordination? Agency/Group/Organization David Lawrence Centers for Behavioral Health 8 Agency/Group/Organization Special Needs Services Type Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 21 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Other — Non -Housing Community Development Needs How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the The organization was consulted through a virtual anticipated outcomes of the Needs Assessment Meeting consultation or areas for improved coordination? Agency/Group/Organization Drug Free Collier Agency/Group/Organization Special Needs Services Type What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Other — Non -Housing Community Development Needs 9 How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the The organization was consulted through a virtual anticipated outcomes of the Needs Assessment Meeting consultation or areas for improved coordination? Agency/Group/Organization Empty Bowls Naples, Inc Agency/Group/Organization Type Supportive Services What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Other — Non -Housing Community Development Needs 10 How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes of the The organization was consulted through a virtual consultation or areas for Needs Assessment Meeting improved coordination? Agency/Group/Organization Grace Place for Children and Families 11 Agency/Group/Organization Type Youth services Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 22 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Other — Non -Housing Community Development Needs How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the The organization was consulted through a virtual anticipated outcomes of the Needs Assessment Meeting consultation or areas for improved coordination? Agency/Group/Organization Habitat for Humanity of Collier County Agency/Group/Organization Type Housing What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Housing Need Assessment 12 How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the The organization was consulted through a virtual anticipated outcomes of the Needs Assessment Meeting consultation or areas for improved coordination? Agency/Group/Organization Harry Chapin Food Bank Agency/Group/Organization Type Community Services What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Other — Non -Housing Community Development Needs 13 How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the The organization was consulted through a virtual anticipated outcomes of the Needs Assessment Meeting consultation or areas for improved coordination? Agency/Group/Organization Hope for Families Ministry 14 Agency/Group/Organization Type Community Services Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 23 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Other — Non -Housing Community Development Needs How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the The organization was consulted through a virtual anticipated outcomes of the Needs Assessment Meeting consultation or areas for improved coordination? Agency/Group/Organization Immokalee CRA Agency/Group/Organization Neighborhood Organization Type What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Other — Non -Housing Community Development Needs 15 How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the The organization was consulted through a virtual anticipated outcomes of the Needs Assessment Meeting consultation or areas for improved coordination? Agency/Group/Organization Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance Agency/Group/Organization Type Fair Housing What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Services - Barriers to Fair Housing 16 How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the The organization was consulted through a virtual anticipated outcomes of the Needs Assessment Meeting consultation or areas for improved coordination? Agency/Group/Organization Legal Aid Service of Collier County 17 Agency/Group/Organization Type Legal Services Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 24 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Other — Non -Housing Community Development Needs How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the The organization was consulted through a virtual anticipated outcomes of the Needs Assessment Meeting consultation or areas for improved coordination? Agency/Group/Organization Lighthouse of Collier Agency/Group/Organization Special Needs Services Type What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Other — Non -Housing Community Development Needs 18 How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the The organization was consulted through a virtual anticipated outcomes of the Needs Assessment Meeting consultation or areas for improved coordination? Agency/Group/Organization Meals of Hope Agency/Group/Organization Type Supportive Services What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Other — Non -Housing Community Development Needs 19 How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the The organization was consulted through a virtual anticipated outcomes of the Needs Assessment Meeting consultation or areas for improved coordination? Agency/Group/Organization NAMI Collier County 20 Agency/Group/Organization Type Supportive Services Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 25 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Other — Non -Housing Community Development Needs How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes of the The organization was consulted through a virtual consultation or areas for Needs Assessment Meeting improved coordination? Agency/Group/Organization Naples Senior Center at JFCS Agency/Group/Organization Type Senior Services What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Other — Non -Housing Community Development Needs 21 How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the The organization was consulted through a virtual anticipated outcomes of the Needs Assessment Meeting consultation or areas for improved coordination? Agency/Group/Organization Our Daily Bread Food Pantry Incorporated Agency/Group/Organization Type Community Services What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Other — Non -Housing Community Development Needs 22 How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the The organization was consulted through a virtual anticipated outcomes of the Needs Assessment Meeting consultation or areas for improved coordination? Agency/Group/Organization Residential Options of Florida (ROOF) 23 Agency/Group/Organization Homeless Services Type Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 26 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Services — Homeless How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the The organization was consulted through a virtual anticipated outcomes of the Needs Assessment Meeting consultation or areas for improved coordination? Agency/Group/Organization St. Matthews House Agency/Group/Organization Homeless Services Type What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Services — Homeless 24 How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the The organization was consulted through a virtual anticipated outcomes of the Needs Assessment Meeting consultation or areas for improved coordination? Agency/Group/Organization St. Vincent de Paul Society, Naples Agency/Group/Organization Community Services Type What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Other — Non -Housing Community Development Needs 25 How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the The organization was consulted through a virtual anticipated outcomes of the Needs Assessment Meeting consultation or areas for improved coordination? Agency/Group/Organization STARability Foundation 26 Agency/Group/Organization Special Needs Services Type Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 27 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Other — Non -Housing Community Development Needs How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the The organization was consulted through a virtual anticipated outcomes of the Needs Assessment Meeting consultation or areas for improved coordination? Agency/Group/Organization The Immokalee Foundation Agency/Group/Organization Type Supportive Services What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Other — Non -Housing Community Development Needs 27 How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the The organization was consulted through a virtual anticipated outcomes of the Needs Assessment Meeting consultation or areas for improved coordination? Agency/Group/Organization The Salvation Army Naples Agency/Group/Organization Type Community Services What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Other — Non -Housing Community Development Needs 28 How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the The organization was consulted through a virtual anticipated outcomes of the Needs Assessment Meeting consultation or areas for improved coordination? Agency/Group/Organization The Shelter for Abused Women & Children 29 Agency/Group/Organization Special Needs Services Type Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 28 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Other — Non -Housing Community Development Needs How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the The organization was consulted through a virtual anticipated outcomes of the Needs Assessment Meeting consultation or areas for improved coordination? Agency/Group/Organization United Way of Collier and the Keys Agency/Group/Organization Type Supportive Services What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Other — Non -Housing Community Development Needs 30 How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes of the The organization was consulted through a virtual consultation or areas for Needs Assessment Meeting improved coordination? Agency/Group/Organization Wounded Warriors of Collier Agency/Group/Organization Type Veterans Services What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Other — Non -Housing Community Development Needs 31 How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the The organization was consulted through a virtual anticipated outcomes of the Needs Assessment Meeting consultation or areas for improved coordination? Agency/Group/Organization Youth Haven, Inc. 32 Agency/Group/Organization Youth services Type Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 29 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Other — Non -Housing Community Development Needs How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the The organization was consulted through a virtual anticipated outcomes of the Needs Assessment Meeting consultation or areas for improved coordination? Table 2 — Other local / regional / federal planning efforts Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 30 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Identify any Agency Types not consulted and provide rationale for not consulting. All entities were considered for consultation. Other local/regional/state/federal planning efforts considered when preparing the Plan Name of Plan Lead Organization How do the goals of your Strategic Plan overlap with the goals of each plan? Continuum of Care Hunger & Homeless Coalition Affordable housing, services, of Collier County and economic development 10 Year Plan to Prevent The Strategic Plan's goals to Hunger and End Hunger & Homeless Coalition address homelessness align Homelessness of Collier County with Continuum of Care's goals and strategies. Barriers to affordable Analysis of Impediments to housing opportunities from Fair Housing Choice, 2021 Collier County the Analysis of Impediments were included in this Consolidated Plan. The MHSA, adopted in 2019, Collier County MHSA Collier County coordinates assistance for Strategic Plan 2019 those with mental health and substance abuse in the area. Urban Land Institute Advisory The ULI Report defines how Services Report Collier County the county will expand affordable housing. Table 2 — Other local / regional / federal planning efforts Describe cooperation and coordination with other public entities, including the State and any adjacent units of general local government, in the implementation of the Consolidated Plan (91.215(1)) In accordance with 24 CFR 91.100(4), the County notified adjacent units of local government of the non -housing community development needs included in its Consolidated Plan. The County will continue to interact with public entities at all levels to ensure coordination and cooperation in the implementation of the Consolidated Plan and thereby maximizing the benefits of the County's housing and community development activities for the residents being served. Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 31 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Coordination with private industry, businesses, developers, and social service agencies included Individual consultations were conducted with affordable housing developers and the social service agencies. The input received during these consultations informed the development of priority needs and recommended strategies. For example, through consultations with developers, it was determined that there remains insufficient access to affordable housing. Likewise, developers have a difficult time finding developable land for affordable housing. The Collier County staff that coordinated the development of the 2021 Consolidated Plan used the Citizen Participation Plan as a guide for consultations. Consultations were conducted with public and non-profit organizations. There were also several public advisory committees that were consulted. Input received from the consultations informed the Needs Assessment, Market Analysis, and Strategic Plan Narrative (optional): Combined, these agencies provide housing and supportive services to the community's special needs populations, including persons with disabilities, homeless families and individuals, chronic homeless persons, persons with HIV/AIDS, and the elderly. In addition to many of the agencies listed above many of the groups and agencies that were consulted provided information during the development of the plan. Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 32 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) PR-15 Citizen Participation — 91.105, 91.115, 91.200(c) and 91.300(c) 1. Summary of citizen participation process/Efforts made to broaden citizen participation. Summarize citizen participation process and how it impacted goal setting. Collier County staff worked with the community in developing goals and objectives. The developed goals are a result of feedback from the community regarding issues to be resolved and projects in need of funding. Collier County has an adopted Citizen Participation Plan to ensure consistent outreach efforts. A community needs survey in English and Spanish was available to residents, housing service providers. The survey ran from January 12, 2021 through February 5, 2021 and was advertised along with the community, meetings through a newspaper advertisement and English and Spanish. A total of 536 surveys were collected. The community survey was released online and promoted through the County's Community and Human Services' web -based resources. The survey respondents ranked helping families with children, providing mortgage and ongoing rental assistance, increasing emergency shelter space/permanent supportive housing, creating jobs in low-income neighborhoods, creating additional rental housing, assisting human service agencies with facilities acquisition or improvements, and housing services as high priorities and needs for the Collier County community. All municipalities were encouraged to have active participation in preparation of the Consolidated Plan by all residents who are affected by Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME), and Emergency Solutions Grants (ESG) funds. The Citizen Participation Plan outlines local responsibilities to provide opportunities for resident involvement. In addition to the survey, residents were invited to participate in an open house to learn about needs identified and strategies being considered to address those needs. Participants were able to provide direct feedback. This feedback informed the selection of priority needs and strategies for the Consolidated Plan, the identification of impediments to fair housing, and the identification of regulatory barriers. Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 33 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Citizen Participation Outreach Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 34 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Sort Mode of Target of Summary of Summary of Summary of URL (if applicable) Comments re comments not Order Outreach Outreach Response ceived accepted /attendance and reasons 1 Internet Non -targeted 536 See Survey None https://www.surveymonkey.com/ Outreach broad Results in r/CollierCountyNeeds community Citizen Participation https://www.surveymonkey.com/ r/ColliernecesitaEspanol Comments. 2 Virtual Public Housing, Five local Affordable None meet.google.com/ikw-gtfk-jbz Needs community organizations Housing, lack of Assessment development, attended the shelters, need Meetings and social service Needs Assessment for housing organizations Meeting. rehabilitation 3 Public Non- The public was The County did All comments Hearing targeted/broad notified of the not receive any were accepted community public meetings via comments a newspaper ad during the public hearing. 4 Consolidated 27 Community plan 2020-2025 stakeholder Community priority needs Direct Stakeholders, interviews were were N/A N/A Contact Nonprofits, held to assess established needs in the from County. comments. Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 35 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Sort Order Mode of Outreach Target of Outreach Summary of Response /attendance Summary of Comments re ceived Summary of comments not accepted and reasons URL (If applicable) 5 A public notice published in the Naples Daily News on Non -English advertised the Speaking - availability Specify of a draft version other language: of the There were no All comments are Newspaper Spanish plan. This draft was comments accepted, and Ad accessible online at received none rejected Nontargeted/ the Collier County broad broad Community and community Human Services' website beginning on and ending on during which time public comment could be submitted Table 3 — Citizen Participation Outreach Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 36 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Community Profile and Needs The Collier County Consolidated Plan relies upon multiple forms of qualitative and quantitative data as well as community input in order to identify housing, homelessness, and community development needs and trends. This picture of need is the basis of the proposed objectives and outcomes for the 2021 Consolidated Plan. In addition to the US Census, updated American Community Survey (ACS) data and community surveys that provides the foundation for development of the document, the Cities of Naples, Everglades, and Marco Island built on the work of several active committees and recent studies that addressed housing, homeless and community development. The assessment was also informed by additional consultations with city officials and other important stakeholders such as the Affordable Housing Advisory Committee, United Way of Collier County, and the Collier County Homeless Coalition. In 2020, the County's economy has continued to diversify and improve, while at the same time leaving many in the community still struggling to find jobs with wages to cover increasing housing costs. There is a significant number of households who cannot meet the basic needs for food, shelter, medical care, and transportation. In addition, there are a growing number of seniors, persons with disabilities, and others who are unable to work. These factors, combined with a very tight housing market, have resulted in many households paying more than they can afford, and a growing number of persons experiencing homelessness. It is important to note that the impacts of the COVID-19 are too recent to be reflected in the data used for the analysis provided below. Population Growth As noted in the 2019 Census American Community Survey, Collier County, Florida had a total population of 384,902 of which 195,189 or 50.7% are female and 189,713 or 49.2% are males when compared to 2010, County's population was 322,472 with 162,493 or 50.3% of females and 159,979 or 49.6% of males. Therefore, reflecting a 19.3% population increase in the Collier County. Population grew to 21,812 in Naples, 7.32% increase since 2010. The population also increased in Marco Island to 17,834, a 5.14% increase since 2010. Last, Everglades City's population decreased to 190, a 41.89% decrease since 2010. Age Distribution The population of Collier County is aging. In 2010, there were 70,289 people aged 60 to 75 and this grew to 87,043 in 2020. For the same period, there were 136,079 people under age 45 in 2010, which has also risen to 162,534 in 2020. Racial and Ethnic Composition Collier County is becoming increasingly racially and ethnically diverse. Latino residents are the fastest growing population, representing 28.6% of the population in the County in 2019. While 11.5% of the population is non -white comprised of 28,704 African Americans, 6,961 Asians, 1,768 American Indian and Alaska Natives, and 6,414 multi -racial persons. %%% Household Composition Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 37 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) As of 2020, family households still make up the largest percentage of households with 69.19% (6,441 in Naples, 5,714 in Marco Island, and 57 in Everglades City) and of those, 10,194 of households are single female- headed households. There has also been a significant increase in single person households which now make up 30.80% of all households. The largest growth in household type is non -family households which increased 12.24% between 2010 and 2020. Average household size is 2.71 in Collier County. Multigenerational living is defined as residing in a home with three or more generations. According to Generations United, the past ten years have seen a remarkably large leap in multigenerational living, from 7% of Americans 2011 to 26% of Americans in 2021. As noted in the 2010 Census, Collier County had a total of 118,258 households of which 2.6% (3,022) were living in multigenerational households. This data is collected during the decennial census every ten years and this data is the most recent data available. MULTIGENERATIONAL HOUSEHOLDS Label Estimate Percent Multigenerational Households 3,022 2.6% Other Households 115,236 97.4% TOTAL 1181258 100% Source: 2010 American Community Survey, 2010: ACS 1-Year Estimates Detailed Tables Income and Poverty According to 2019 ACS, the median income of households in Collier County, Florida was $76,025. An estimated 4.8% of households had income below $10,000 a year and 13.1% had income over $200,000 or more. Although growing, the Median Household Income for Collier County is higher than the US ($65,712) and our northern county, Lee County ($57,832). Further, there are many residents in Collier County that are struggling, as evidenced by other indicators: 6.5% or 9,164 residents receive food stamp benefits (SNAP), 61% of students are eligible for free and reduced lunch. Low wages also contribute to financial instability. In 2019, 48,825 individuals in Collier County had incomes below 125%%of the poverty levels as indicated in the chart below. Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 38 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) 2019 FEDERAL POVERTY GUIDELINES (FPG) ANNUAL & MONTHLY INCOME LEVELS FROM 100% to 250% FAMILY FPG (100%) 125 % of FPG 150 % of FPG 175 % of FPG 185 % of FPG 200 % of FPG 235 /o of FPG 250 % of FPG SIZE YEAR MONTH YEAR MONTH YEAR MONTH YEAR MONTH YEAR MONTH YEAR MONTH YEAR MONTH YEAR MONTH 1 $12,490 $1,041 $15,613 $1,301 $18,735 $1,561 $21,858 $1,822 $23,107 $1,926 $24,980 $2,082 S29,352 $2,446 S31,225 $2,602 2 $16,910 $1,409 $21,138 $1,762 $25,365 $2,114 $29,593 $2,466 $31,284 $2,607 $33,820 $2,818 $39,739 $3,312 $42.275 $3,523 3 $21,330 $1,77B $26,663 $2,222 $31.995 $2,666 $37,328 $3,111 $39,461 $3,288 $42.660 $3,555 $50,126 $4,177 $53.326 $4,444 4 $25,750 $2,146 $32,188 $2,682 $38,625 $3.219 $45.063 $3,755 $47,638 $3.970 $51.500 $4,292 $60,513 $5 043 $64.375 $5,365 5 $30.170 $2,514 $37,713 $3,143 $45,255 $3,771 $52.798 $4,400 $55,815 $4,651 $60,340 $5,028 $70.900 $5.908 $75 425 $6,285 6 $34.590 $2,883 $43,238 $3,603 $51.885 S4,324 $60.533 $5.044 $63.992 $5.333 $69.180 $5,765 $81.287 $6.774 $86.475 $7,206 7 $39.010 $3,251 $48.763 S4,064 $58.515 $4,876 $68.268 $5.689 $72.169 $6.014 $78,020 $6,502 $91.674 $7,640 $97,525 $8.127 8 $43.430 $3,619 $54,288 $4,524 $65,145 $5.429 $76,003 $6.334 $80.346 $6,696 $86.860 $7,238 $102,061 $8.505 $108.576 $9.048 $4.420 $368 $5,525 $460 $6,630 $553 $7,735 $645 $8.177 1 $681 $8.840 $737 $10,387 $866 $11.050 $921 'For family units over 8, add the amount shown for each additional member. Source: https:Hdch.georgia.gov/document/document/2019-federal-poverty-guidelines/download Map t erpf-ml Low -Mod $IOGk GrObp! Lover -Mod Black Groups Collier County, Florida Big C.I Fbbw, ►I.-J* F' lher N&I W.W IL Rsl Snurre- HUD CPJ) IvIappirtg Tool, https-//cgis_htld.gov/cpolnaps/ Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 39 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Persons with Disabilities According to the 2019 ACS, of the total population of 384,902 there were 47,569 people, or 12.3%, live with one or more disabilities. The highest reported disabilities include ambulatory at 6.3%, cognitive at 3.9%, and difficulty with independent living 5.2%. Persons Experiencing Homelessness The 2021 Point -in -Time Count (PIT) identified 568 people in Collier County experiencing homelessness, a 5.8% decrease from 2020. Over 25% of this population, or 144 individuals, met HUD's definition of unsheltered. As a disclaimer, these numbers may be under reported due to COVID. The 2021 PIT count also found that 169 persons experiencing homelessness were seriously mentally ill, 198 reported substance abuse, 34 were veterans, 49 were seniors, and 49 were families with comprised of adults and 109 children. For FY 2021, Collier County reported that 568 unduplicated individuals who were homeless received human services from one or more agencies. During the 2020-2021 school year, the Collier County public school reported 805 homeless youth, includes students who are staying with friends or family. The reported number includes 183 homeless youth (16 and older) who were unaccompanied. Persons with Special Needs who are not Homeless Limited new data exists specific to non -homeless special needs populations in Collier County. There are numerous sub -populations in this community. Of those, there are some that have both enough and unique housing and service needs that warrant identification. Those include the following: families with children, seniors, ex -offenders, people with HIV/AIDS, victims of domestic violence, people with drug and alcohol addictions, people who are evicted or foreclosed, people with physical and mental disabilities, veterans, youth and young adults, and youth aging out of foster care. Employment and Economy Economic conditions in Collier County have recovered significantly in the past decade, and the County has emerged as a more diversified economy than it was before the Great Recession. The number of jobs has grown steadily during the decade, and unemployment rates have remained relatively low during recent years (below 3%). Wages have slightly risen 1.9% in the County as reflected in the household earnings chart below: Household Earnings 2017-2019 Collier County, Florida 2017 2018 2019 $40,622.00 $40,892.00 $41,415.00 Source: Census, ACS Estimates 2017-2019, data.census.gov As of 2019, there were 166,353 (50.7%) persons in the labor force 16 years and older and 161,557 (49.3%) not in the labor force. According to 2019 ACS estimates, 4,929 or 1.5% of the total population was unemployed. Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 40 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) While there have been recent and significant job losses as a result of COVID-19, it is unclear how sustained these job losses will be as social distancing measures diminish. It is apparent however that many people with limited incomes are experiencing financial instability as a result of recent events. Housing Units and Tenure According to 2019 ACS estimates, the County had a total of 222,289 housing units. The majority of the housing units are single family 1-unit detached unit structures at 90,552 (40.7%) of the total units. The remainder consisting of 1-unit, attached at 15,145 (6.8%), 2-9 multi -family units at 44,174 (20.1%), 10-20 multi -family units at 59,697 (26.9%) and a small share of mobile/manufactured homes at 12,499 (5.6%) of the housing units. Housing Cost Burden While wages and incomes have continued to rise in recent years, they have not kept pace with the cost of both owner and rental housing in Collier County. From 2010 to 2019, Median Household Income increased 44% from 2010 at $52,730 to 2019 at $76,025. Housing costs in the county area have risen more sharply since 2010, especially in recent years. According to 2019 ACS estimates, the County's median home prices have increased by 44.8% between 2010 and 2019, reaching $370,000. The County's median gross rental rates have also increased substantially faster than incomes and the home values. Between 2010 and 2019, the median rental rate rose to 48.3% from $942 in 2010 to $1,397 in 2019. As a result, many households pay more for housing than is affordable, or are unable to afford any housing. Households paying more than 30% of household income are considered to have a 'housing cost burden'. A total of 9,545 of renters in Collier County have cost burdens greater than 30% but less than 50% of the Area Median Income, while a total of 14,685 of homeowners have cost burdens greater than 30% but less than 50% of the Area Median Income. Housing Conditions and Lead Based Paint Approximately 17% (37,852) of the total housing units were built prior to 1980 and may contain lead -based paint. Approximately 37,852 homes pose potential lead -based paint hazards in Collier County. Despite the age of the housing stock, the physical condition of the housing in Collier County is generally good, as there are relatively few housing units (1,715) in the area that are considered substandard according to HUD. Based on input received during provider and public consultations, units available to low-income residents tend to have more significant issues, and because of the scarcity of affordable low-income housing, residents are reluctant to raise their concerns for fear of losing the housing. Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 41 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Needs Assessment The Needs Assessment examines needs related to affordable housing, special needs housing, community development and homelessness. With input from data and market analysis, as well as community outreach and stakeholder consultation, the Needs Assessment identifies needs that form the basis for the Strategic Plan section and future programs and projects to implement the strategic plan. NA-05 Overview Needs Assessment Overview Based on HUD provided figures, the following data indicates the number and percentage of renters and homeowners who may be subject to housing problems, based on income level. The current economic recession has substantially increased the number of households experiencing housing problems and cost burdens. HUD receives a "special tabulation" of data from the U.S. Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS) that is largely not available through standard Census products. These "special tabulation" data provide counts of the numbers of households that fit certain combinations of HUD -specified criteria such as housing needs, HUD -defined income limits (primarily 30, 50, and 80% of area median income) and household types of particular interest to planners and policymakers. This data, known as the Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) data, is used by local governments for housing planning and as part of the Consolidated Planning process. Assessing the specific housing needs of Collier County is critical to creating a realistic and responsive affordable housing strategy. As such, an assessment of the County's affordable rental and single-family homes was conducted based on available demographic, economic and housing data for Collier County utilizing HUD's new eCon Planning Suite downloaded in the Integrated Disbursement and Information System (IDIS). The eCon Planning Suite pre -populates the most up-to-date housing and economic data available to assist jurisdictions identify funding priorities in the Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plan. Highlights of this assessment are provided in this section. NA-10 Housing Needs Assessment - 24 CFR 91.205 (a,b,c) Summary of Housing Needs According to the 2019 American Community Survey, Collier County is home to 384,902 residents. As indicated below by the ACS data, there were 321,520 residents living in 118,289 households in 2010, as shown in Table 4. As noted in the 2019 ACS, Collier County had a total of 140,578 households. By comparison in 2010, the population and number of households had increased by 19.7%. Likewise, the number of households in 2019 (140,578) also increased by 18.8% since 2010. Compared to the 2019 State of Florida and national figures of $59,227.00 and $65,712.00 Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 42 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) respectively, Collier County has a higher median income of $76,025.00 compared to the state and the national median household income. HOUSING TENURE Estimate Percent Owner -Occupied Housing Units 104,357 74.2% Renter -Occupied Housing Units 36,221 25.8% TOTAL UNITS 140,578 100.0% 2019 ACS (Most Recent Year) Demographics Base Year: 2010 Most Recent Year: 2019 % Change Population 321,520 384,902 19.7% Households 118,289 140,578 18.8% Median Income $52,730 $76,025 44.1% Table 4 - Housing Needs Assessment Demographics Data Source: 2010 ACS (Base Year), 2019 ACS (Most Recent Year) Number of Households Table - >80- 0-30% >30-50% >50-80% >100% 100 100% HAMFI HAMFI HAMFI HAMFI HAMFI Total Households 11,000 13,090 20,790 11,710 54,545 Small Family Households 3,474 4,470 5,800 4,630 18,420 Large Family Households 870 1,430 2,084 710 2,724 Household contains at least one person 62-74 years of age 2,484 3,125 5,380 3,154 18,700 Household contains at least one -person age 75 or older 2,418 3,040 5,169 2,140 10,934 Households with one or more children 6 years old 1,804 2,849 2,868 1,378 4,076 or younger Table 5 - Total Households Table Data 2011-2015 CHAS Source: Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 43 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Housing Needs Summary Tables 1. Housing Problems (Households with one of the listed needs) Renter Owner 0-30% >30- >50- >80- Total 0-30% >30- >50- >80- Total AMI 50% 80% 100% AMI 50% 80% 100% AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS Substandard Housing - Lacking complete 60 190 105 120 475 35 34 145 85 299 plumbing or kitchen facilities Severely Overcrowded - With >1.51 people per 205 340 105 4 654 80 8 30 55 173 room (and complete kitchen and plumbing) Overcrowded - With 1.01-1.5 people per 555 855 534 160 2,104 169 270 430 195 1,064 room (and none of the above problems) Housing cost burden greater than 50% of 3,180 2,120 860 90 6,250 3,325 2,300 2,175 935 8,735 income (and none of the above problems) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 44 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Renter Owner 0-30% >30- >50- >80- Total 0-30% >30- >50- >80- Total AMI 50% 80% 100% AMI 50% 80% 100% AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI Housing cost burden greater than 30% of income (and none of 235 1,985 3,440 1,025 6,685 645 1,865 3,205 1,760 7,475 the above problems) Zero/negative Income (and none of 495 0 0 0 495 959 0 0 0 959 the above problems) Table 6 — Housing Problems Table Data 2011-2015 CHAS Source: The following tables identify housing needs by both income bracket and renter/owner. The housing problems are identified as follows: 1. Substandard housing; unit lacking complete kitchen facilities. 2. Substandard housing; unit lacking complete bathroom facilities. 3. Cost burden of more than 30% of the household income (for renters, housing costs include rent paid by the tenant plus utilities; for owners, housing costs include mortgage payments, taxes, insurance, and utilities) 4. Overcrowding: more than one (1) person per room, not including bathrooms, porches, foyers, halls, or half -rooms Severe housing problems are: 1. Substandard housing; unit lacking complete kitchen facilities. 2. Substandard housing; unit lacking complete bathroom facilities. Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 45 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) 3. Severe cost burden of more than 50% of the household income (for renters, housing costs include rent paid by the tenant plus utilities; for owners, housing costs include mortgage payments, taxes, insurance, and utilities 4. Severe overcrowding more than 1.5 persons per room, not including bathrooms, porches, foyers, halls, or half -rooms 2. Housing Problems 2 (Households with one or more Severe Housing Problems: Lacks kitchen or complete plumbing, severe overcrowding, severe cost burden) Renter Owner 0-30% >30- >50- >80- Total 0-30% >30- >50- >80- Total AMI 50% 80% 100% AMI 50% 80% 100% AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS Having 1 or more of four housing problems 3,995 3,500 1,604 380 9,479 3,600 2,605 2,785 1,265 10,255 Having none of four housing problems 685 2,850 6,005 3,709 13,249 1,270 4,125 10,380 6,340 22,115 Household has negative income, but none of the other housing problems 495 0 0 0 495 959 0 0 0 959 Table 7 — Housing Problems 2 Data 2011-2015 CHAS Source: Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 46 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) 3. Cost Burden > 30% Renter Owner 0-30% AMI >30-50% AMI >50-80% AMI Total 0-30% AMI >30-50% AMI >50-80% AMI Total NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS Small Related 2,044 2,725 1,850 6,619 974 990 1,440 3,404 Large Related 575 730 245 1,550 225 304 600 1,129 Elderly 804 849 1,133 2,786 2,334 2,539 2,975 7,848 Other 765 900 1,357 3,022 630 493 650 1,773 Total need by income 4,188 5,204 4,585 13,977 4,163 4,326 5,665 14,154 Table 8 — Cost Burden > 30% Data 2011-2015 CHAS Source: Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 47 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) 4. Cost Burden > 50% Renter Owner 0-30% AMI >30-50% AMI >50-80% AMI Total 0-30% AMI >30-50% AMI >50-80% AMI Total NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS Small Related 1,950 1,015 305 3,270 749 635 455 1,839 Large Related 435 85 10 530 130 79 105 314 Elderly 674 740 390 1,804 2,054 1,369 1,395 4,818 Other 715 515 179 1,409 510 268 230 1,008 Total need by income 3,774 2,355 884 7,013 3,443 2,351 2,185 7,979 Table 9 — Cost Burden > 50% Data 2011-2015 CHAS Source: In Collier County, the majority of those households experiencing a housing problem are cost burdened or severely cost burdened. Households defined as "other' experience cost burden and severe cost burden at the highest rate. "Other" is a single person or a nonfamily household, meaning several non -related individuals sharing a household. Those small family households (2-4 family members) and those "other" households experience cost burden and severe cost burden at similar rates. Within the 50-80% AMI bracket, nearly half of those households experiencing severe cost burden are elderly households. This is most indicative of elderly homeowners that are living on a fixed income. Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 48 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) 5. Crowding (More than one person per room) Renter Owner 0-30% AMI >30- 50% AMI >50- 80% AMI >80- 100% AMI Total 0-30% AMI >30- 50% AMI >50- 80% AMI >80- 100% AMI Total NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS Single family households 695 945 589 144 2,373 209 209 375 160 953 Multiple, unrelated family households 65 210 44 10 329 29 69 99 90 287 Other, non -family households 10 50 10 10 80 4 0 0 0 4 Total need by income 770 1,205 643 164 2,782 242 278 474 250 1,244 Table 10 — Crowding Information —1/2 Data 2011-2015 CHAS Source: Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 49 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Renter Owner 0-30% >30- >50- Total 0-30% >30- >50- Total AMI 50% 80% AMI 50% 80% AMI AMI AMI AMI Households with 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Children Present Table 11— Crowding Information — 2/2 Describe the number and type of single person households in need of housing assistance. Estimates of the number of single person households in need of housing assistance are not available for Collier County. In Tables 8 and 9 above, non -elderly single person households are included in the "other" households category, along with non -family households, such as roommates or non -married partner households. Table 8 shows that there are an estimated 3,022 "other" renter households and 1,773 "other" owner households with low or moderate incomes who spend more than 30% of their income on housing. Of these, 48% of renter households and 73% of owner households are also severely cost burdened, meaning that they spend over 50% of their income on housing and may be in the need of housing assistance. Estimate the number and type of families in need of housing assistance who are disabled or victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking. According to the 2015-2019 5-Year American Community Survey, there are an estimated 42,528 disabled persons in Collier County, comprising about 11.5% of its population. While housing need is not estimated for the disabled population, the ACS does provide poverty rates by disability status, which can serve as an indicator of potential need, given that households with lower incomes are more likely to have a housing problem. For persons aged 18 to 64, 25% of the disabled population (11,670 persons) is impoverished, compared to 13% of the non -disabled population. For seniors, the poverty rate of disabled persons is 9% (1,983 persons) compared to 6% for those without a disability. Thus, poverty rates suggest that disabled adults in Collier County would be more likely to have difficulty affording housing than their non -disabled counterparts. Additionally, a limited supply of accessible housing, the cost of making needed modifications, and the limited availability of supportive housing for persons with developmental or substance abuse disabilities represent housing needs for the County's disabled population. Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 50 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) According to the 2021 Point in Time Count, the County served 122 victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, or stalking who were in need of housing assistance. Input from housing and homeless services providers, however, indicates a continued need for housing for domestic violence victims in Collier County. The Shelter for Abused Women & Children operates two 60-bed emergency shelters in Naples and Immokalee as well as nine transitional living cottages in Naples. According to their 2019-2020 Impact Report, there were 1,686 Collier County domestic violence calls to 911 in 2019. As evidence of the continuing need for housing for domestic violence victims, in its last fiscal year, The Shelter provided over 1,500 nights of housing to women and their children, over 14,689 hours of counseling, and education regarding domestic abuse to more than 20,000 professionals and community members. What are the most common housing problems? By far the most common housing problems in Collier County for both owners and renters are cost burdening and severe cost burdening. Table 8 reveals that 13,977 low- and moderate -income renter households spend more than 30% of their income on housing, as do 14,154 low- and moderate -income owner households. Taken together, there are 28,131 cost burdened households with incomes below 80% AMI. Of these, 14,992 households have a severe cost burden (7,013 renters and 7,979 owners), comprising 31% of total low- and moderate -income households, as Table 9 displays. The high rates of cost burden indicate that many households in the County are not able to adequately save for unexpected events and occasionally even planned expenses. It is important to consider that cost burden impacts households across all income brackets. During stakeholder engagements, community members consistently brought up the issue of limited housing options as a concern. This goes past just affordability, but includes accessibility, proximity to household needs, and size. Households may often choose to be cost burdened in lieu of choosing a housing unit that costs less than 30% of their income. This circumstance impacts low- and moderate -income households most often, and more specifically renter households. Crowding (more than one person per room) affects 2,618 renters and 994 owners with low and moderate incomes, or 9% of all households in that income group (Table 10), a considerably lower share than are affected by cost burdens or severe cost burdens. Substandard housing (lacking complete plumbing or kitchen facilities) affects the smallest number of low- and moderate -income households in Collier County: 355 renters and 214 owners, or 2% of all households with incomes under 80% AMI, according to Table 7. Staff opinion, consultation, and citizen participation demonstrated that the most common housing problems were deferred maintenance, lack of income/savings for down payments, and poor credit scores. These are all consistent with the needs of cost burdened households, and strategies such as housing rehabilitation and down payment assistance were identified as solutions to these problems. Are any populations/household types more affected than others by these problems? Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 51 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Households with incomes lower than 80% AMI are more affected by housing cost burdens and thus, have the greatest needs. The data in Table 8 reveals that 13,977 low- and moderate -income renter households spend more than 30% of their income on housing, as do 14,154 low- and moderate -income owner households. Over 31% of low-income households are severely cost burdened. Describe the characteristics and needs of Low-income individuals and families with children (especially extremely low-income) who are currently housed but are at imminent risk of either residing in shelters or becoming unsheltered 91.205(c)/91.305(c)). Also discuss the needs of formerly homeless families and individuals who are receiving rapid re -housing assistance and are nearing the termination of that assistance. Individuals with an imminent risk of residing in shelters or becoming unsheltered typically have a combination of financial factors present in their lives: lack of living wage job, rent consuming more than 30% of their income, and high childcare, medical, or transportation costs. In addition to these factors, individuals at risk of homelessness will often have additional issues present such as family conflicts, domestic violence, doubling up with family members, recent crisis, housing with code or safety violations, family members with disabilities, criminal histories, history of mental health or chemical dependency, difficulty navigating systems to access public benefits or community -based services, and prior experience with homelessness. For formerly homeless families and individuals receiving rapid re -housing assistance but nearing the termination of that assistance, key needs include access to Social Security disability and other benefits; stable employment or access to mainstream job training, employment, and education programs; linkages to health and mental health services; convenient access to affordable childcare and transportation; and continued case management and supportive services. If a jurisdiction provides estimates of the at -risk population(s), it should also include a description of the operational definition of the at -risk group and the methodology used to generate the estimates: Collier County does not prepare estimates of its at -risk population. The Collier County Continuum of Care (CoC) uses HMIS to collect and track data on housing and services to persons experiencing homelessness and who are at -risk of homelessness. The CoC utilizes HUD's official definition of at -risk for homelessness released in January 2012. There are three categories to the definition: Individuals and Families; Unaccompanied Children and Youth, and Families with Children and Youth. The Collier County Hunger and Homeless Coalition's 2021 Point -in -Time Count of homeless persons identified 568 persons who are experiencing homelessness. Including people staying temporarily with family or friends, in a hotel or motel, or sharing a home on a more or less permanent basis with another family, often living in crowded or inadequate conditions, this number increases to 1,373 persons experiencing homelessness. Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 52 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Specify particular housing characteristics that have been linked with instability and an increased risk of homelessness. The characteristic most closely linked to housing instability is a household's financial circumstance. Cost burden places households in a situation where unexpected expenses or sheer time of deficit spending may cause a household to become homeless. The United Way Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) Report found that 30% of Collier County households earn the ALICE survival budget or less. The ALICE Report looks at working families and their ability to afford basic needs for the households such as food, clothing, healthcare, transportation, housing, taxes, etc. As cost of housing is a single variable, there are others, too, that may place a household in a vulnerable financial position and increase the chance of becoming homeless. A household that incurs childcare costs that ultimately earns less than 80% of the area median income is at -risk. Additionally, the frequent moves of families who are homeless or at risk of homelessness has placed additional barriers to educational attainment for children. The high housing costs puts household at risk of homelessness at any given time, it is impossible to know which of those households will experience domestic violence, the loss of a job, a death, a health event, or another adverse circumstance that can trigger homelessness. It is extremely difficult to predict the next homeless cases among those who are currently housed. Low incomes and high housing cost burdens are two housing characteristics linked with instability and an increased risk of homelessness. Renters with incomes under 30% AMI and housing costs burdens over 50% are at risk of homelessness, especially if they experience a destabilizing event such as a job loss, reduction in hours, or medical emergency/condition. Additionally, families or individuals doubling up with other, unrelated households are at an increased risk of homelessness. In Collier County, there are 3,774 extremely low-income renter households (under 30% AMI) spending more than 50% of their income on housing. Collier County also has 770 households comprised of multiple, unrelated families living together in overcrowded conditions. Households with members that are elderly, have a disability, or require regular supportive services are also at greater risk. These households, no matter the income bracket, often spend more financial resources on care for these individuals. The care may require time away from work by a family member or require hired help or fee -for -service. In any case, these households are more financially vulnerable; if these households are also earning less than 80% of the area median income, the data shows that this household is likely also cost burdened. These types of households are at increased risk of homelessness. Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 53 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) NA-15 Disproportionately Greater Need: Housing Problems — 91.205 (b)(2) Assess the need of any racial or ethnic group that has disproportionately greater need in comparison to the needs of that category of need as a whole. Introduction HUD defines a disproportionately greater number of housing problems by a racial or ethnic group as when a group experiences housing problem at a rate more than 10% greater than the income group as a whole. The data summarizes the percentage of each minority group experiencing any of the four housing problems: cost burden (paying more than 30% of income for housing); overcrowding (more than one person per room); and lacking complete kitchen facilities or complete plumbing facilities (substandard housing). Income classifications are defined as: extremely low-income (under 30% of HAMFI); low-income (between 30 and 50%); moderate -income (between 50 and 80%); and middle -income (between 80 and 100%). The 2011-2015 CHAS data provided in the tables below include households with or more of the following housing problems: ■ lack of complete kitchen facilities ■ lack of complete plumbing facilities ■ overcrowding (i.e., more than one person per room) ■ cost burden greater than 30% (i.e., spending more than 30% of income on housing -related costs). 0%-30% of Area Median Income 77% of households in Collier County , at extremely low incomes, have one or more housing problems (8,480 as shown in Table 12). Whites and American Indian, Alaska Native are somewhat less likely to experience a housing need (72% and 50%, respectively), while African Americans, Asians, and Hispanics are more so (84-92%). At 0-30% of Area Median Income, Asians (92%) have a disproportionately greater need than the jurisdiction as a whole. Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 54 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Housing Problems Has one or more of four housing problems Has none of the four housing problems Household has no/negative income, but none of the other housing problems Jurisdiction as a whole 8,480 1,070 1,454 White 4,700 755 1,114 Black / African American 1,010 60 130 Asian 44 0 4 American Indian, Alaska Native 8 4 4 Pacific Islander 0 0 0 Hispanic 2,675 240 200 Other 43 11 2 Table 12 - Disproportionally Greater Need 0 - 30% AMI Data Source: 2011-2015 CHAS *The four housing problems are: 1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities, 2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities, 3. More than one person per room, 4. Cost Burden greater than 30% 30%-50% of Area Median Income Over three-quarters of households with incomes from 30% to 50%AMI have one or more housing problems (76% or 9,960 households). Asians and Whites face housing problems at a somewhat lower rate (55% and 69%, respectively), while other racial/ethnic groups face needs at a higher rate than the jurisdiction as a whole. Two groups have a disproportionately greater rate of housing problems: 88% of African American and 71% of the 14 American Indians/Alaska Natives households have one or more housing needs. Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 55 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Housing Problems Has one or more of four housing problems Has none of the four housing problems Household has no/negative income, but none of the other housing problems Jurisdiction as a whole 9,960 3,135 0 White 5,100 2,305 0 Black / African American 1,130 148 0 Asian 30 25 0 American Indian, Alaska Native 10 4 0 Pacific Islander 0 0 0 Other 51 19 0 Hispanic 3,639 634 0 Table 13 - Disproportionally Greater Need 30 - 50% AMI Data Source: 2011-2015 CHAS *The four housing problems are: 1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities, 2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities, 3. More than one person per room, 4. Cost Burden greater than 30% 50%-80% of Area Median Income Of the 20,795 Collier County households with low incomes, 53% have at least one housing problem. As in other income groups, moderate income Whites face housing needs at a somewhat lower proportion than the county overall (51%), while African Americans and Hispanics have higher rate of housing problems (67% and 55%, respectively). Asians have a disproportionately higher incidence of housing need 86% or 189 households. Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 56 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Housing Problems Has one or more of four housing problems Has none of the four housing problems Household has no/negative income, but none of the other housing problems Jurisdiction as a whole 11,045 9,750 0 White 7,370 7,079 0 Black / African American 709 343 0 Asian 189 30 0 American Indian, Alaska Native 0 19 0 Pacific Islander 0 0 0 Other 52 79 0 Hispanic 2,725 2,200 0 Table 14 - Disproportionally Greater Need 50 - 80% AMI Data Source: 2011-2015 CHAS *The four housing problems are: 1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities, 2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities, 3. More than one person per room, 4. Cost Burden greater than 30% 80%-100% of Area Median Income Of the middle -income households in Collier County, 38% or 4,425 have at least one housing problem. No group has a disproportionately greater need than the jurisdiction as a whole. Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 57 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Housing Problems Has one or more of four housing problems Has none of the four housing problems Household has no/negative income, but none of the other housing problems Jurisdiction as a whole 4,425 7,259 0 White 3,170 4,909 0 Black / African American 255 490 0 Asian 49 44 0 American Indian, Alaska Native 8 55 0 Pacific Islander 0 0 0 Other 10 76 0 Hispanic 933 1,685 0 Table 15 - Disproportionally Greater Need 80 - 100% AMI Data Source: 2011-2015 CHAS *The four housing problems are: 1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities, 2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities, 3. More than one person per room, 4. Cost Burden greater than 30% Discussion Overall, 2011-2015 CHAS data regarding housing problems by income level and race/ethnicity show that need is more common at low incomes households face one or more housing problems. Six groups experience a disproportionately greater incidence of housing needs than the county as a whole. They include low income (30-50% AMI) African American households (of whom 84% face a housing problem) and Asian households (92%) compared to 77% of the jurisdiction as a whole. At moderate incomes (50-80% AMI), African Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 58 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Americans and Asians face a disproportionate need (67% and 86%, respectively, compared to 53% for the jurisdiction as a whole. Finally, at middle incomes, no group has a disproportionately greater need than the jurisdiction as a whole. NA-20 Disproportionately Greater Need: Severe Housing Problems — 91.205 (b)(2) Assess the need of any racial or ethnic group that has disproportionately greater need in comparison to the needs of that category of need as a whole. Introduction HUD defines a disproportionately greater housing need when a racial or ethnic group experiences housing problems at a rate over 10percentage points than that of the corresponding income level as a whole. The data table below summarizes the percentage of each racial/ethnic group experiencing housing problems by HUD Adjusted Median Family Income (HAMFI) levels. Where the HUD tables below report AMI, they refer to HAMFI. Housing problems include: • Lacks complete kitchen facilities. • Lacks complete plumbing facilities. • More than 1.5 persons per room • Cost Burden over 50% Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 59 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) 0%-30% of Area Median Income At extremely low incomes, 69% of households in Collier County experience a severe housing problem (7,595 households). About two- thirds of Whites have a severe housing need (65%), as do 76% of African Americans and 74% of Hispanics. Asian households face severe housing problems at a disproportionately greater rate (92% or 44 households). Severe Housing Problems* Has one or more of four housing problems Has none of the four housing problems Household has no/negative income, but none of the other housing problems Jurisdiction as a whole 7,595 1,955 1,454 White 4,270 1,180 1,114 Black / African American 915 154 130 Asian 44 0 4 American Indian, Alaska Native 8 4 4 Pacific Islander 0 0 0 Other 48 17 2 Hispanic 2,310 600 200 Table 16 — Severe Housing Problems 0 - 30% AMI Data Source: 2011-2015 CHAS *The four severe housing problems are: 1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities, 2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities, 3. More than 1.5 persons per room, 4. Cost Burden over 50% Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 60 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) 30%-50% of Area Median Income At very low incomes (30-50% AMI), 46% or 6,105 Collier County households have a severe housing problem. Whites (44%) and Hispanics (49%) face severe housing problems at rates relatively close to that of the County. African Americans have a disproportionately high rate of severe housing needs — 58% of the 1,285 households have one or more severe housing needs. Severe Housing Problems* Has one or more of four housing problems Has none of the four housing problems Household has no/negative income, but none of the other housing problems Jurisdiction as a whole 6,105 6,975 0 White 3,230 4,185 0 Black / African American 740 545 0 Asian 0 55 0 American Indian, Alaska Native 0 14 0 Pacific Islander 0 0 0 Other 36 1 0 Hispanic 2,099 2,175 0 Table 17 — Severe Housing Problems 30 - 50% AMI Data Source: 2011-2015 CHAS *The four severe housing problems are: 1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities, 2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities, 3. More than 1.5 persons per room, 4. Cost Burden over 50% Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 61 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) 50%-80% of Area Median Income At 50-80% AMI, 21% of low-income households have one or more severe housing needs (4,389 households). At this income level, two racial/ethnic groups have disproportionately high rates of severe housing needs: African Americans (39% or 409 households) and Asians (77% or 1,060 households). Severe Housing Problems* Has one or more of four housing problems Has none of the four housing problems Household has no/negative income, but none of the other housing problems Jurisdiction as a whole 4,389 16,385 0 White 2,720 11,719 0 Black / African American 409 639 0 Asian 174 50 0 American Indian, Alaska Native 0 19 0 Pacific Islander 0 0 0 Other 26 93 0 Hispanic 1,060 3,865 0 Table 18 — Severe Housing Problems 50 - 80% AMI Data Source: 2011-2015 CHAS *The four severe housing problems are: 1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities, 2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities, 3. More than 1.5 persons per room, 4. Cost Burden over 50% Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 62 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) 80%-100% of Area Median Income At middle incomes, 14% or 1,645 households have a severe housing problem. African Americans have a disproportionately high rate of severe housing needs (23% or 1,080 households). Severe Housing Problems* Has one or more of four housing problems Has none of the four housing problems Household has no/negative income, but none of the other housing problems Jurisdiction as a whole 1,645 10,049 0 White 1,080 6,999 0 Black / African American 169 575 0 Asian 4 90 0 American Indian, Alaska Native 4 59 0 Pacific Islander 0 0 0 Other 3 91 0 Hispanic 385 2,235 0 Table 19 — Severe Housing Problems 80 -100% AMI Data Source: 2011-2015 CHAS *The four severe housing problems are: 1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities, 2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities, 3. More than 1.5 persons per room, 4. Cost Burden over 50% Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 63 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Discussion Overall, severe housing problems are most acute at lower income levels. A little over two-thirds (69%) of Collier County households with incomes below 30% AMI face a severe need, as do 69% in the 30-50% AMI income range. As incomes increase, rates of severe housing problems lessen, dropping to 21% at the 50-80% AMI income level and 14% at the 80-100% AMI level. African American households face disproportionately high rate of severe housing needs at three income levels: low, moderate, and middle incomes. Asians are disproportionately affected by severe housing needs at the very low and moderate level incomes. NA-25 Disproportionately Greater Need: Housing Cost Burdens — 91.205 (b)(2) Assess the need of any racial or ethnic group that has disproportionately greater need in comparison to the needs of that category of need as a whole. Introduction: Per HUD definitions, a "disproportionate need" exists when any group has a housing need that is 10% or higher than the jurisdiction as a whole. A household is considered cost burdened when they are paying more than 30% of their income towards housing costs, including utilities. This section analyzes the extent of cost burden and identifies populations that are disproportionately affected. Housing Cost Burden Housing Cost Burden <=30% 30-50% >50% No / negative income (not computed) Jurisdiction as a whole 71,165 21,060 17,399 1,485 White 57,740 13,975 11,925 1,130 Black / African American 2,209 1,345 1,299 130 Asian 545 165 214 4 American Indian, Alaska Native 145 14 8 4 Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 64 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Housing Cost Burden <=30% 30-50% >50% No / negative income (not computed) Pacific Islander 0 0 0 0 Other 552 71 114 2 Hispanic 9,974 5,490 3,839 215 Table 20 — Greater Need: Housing Cost Burdens AMI Data Source: 2011-2015 CHAS Discussion: According to Table 20, 19% of households in Collier County spend 30-50% of their income on housing -related costs. African American and Latino households are more likely to spend within this range when compared to the jurisdiction overall (26% and 28%, respectively). No racial or ethnic group is disproportionately likely to fall within this category. Severely cost burdened households (i.e., households spending more than 50% of their income on housing) account for 16% of Collier County households, an estimated 17,399 households county wide. Rates of severe cost burdening by race and ethnicity range from 18%for Whites to 30%for African Americans, not including Pacific Islander households, of whom zero face severe cost burdens. African Americans are the only group to face a disproportionately high rate of severe cost burdening (30% versus 16% for the jurisdiction as a whole). Combining the 30-50% and over 50% cost ranges shows that there is a total of 48,049 cost burdened households in Collier County, which constitutes 35% of the county's total households. By race and ethnicity, rates of cost burdening range from 13% for American Indians/Alaska Natives to 53%for African Americans. Two groups are disproportionately likely to be cost burdened: African Americans (53% or 2,644 households) and Hispanics (48% or 9,329 households). Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 65 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) NA-30 Disproportionately Greater Need: Discussion — 91.205(b)(2) Are there any Income categories in which a racial or ethnic group has disproportionately greater need than the needs of that income category as a whole? The data in the Disproportionately Greater Need section of this document (NA-15 through NA-25) reflects that there are certain races and/or ethnicities that experience housing problems and cost burden at disproportionately higher rates as compared to all households within their same income bracket. This does not imply that explicit/overt policies or actions are being taken to create a market where minorities are not able to afford a quality home or a home at all. What the data in sections Needs Assessment -15 and -20 above more so reflect is the discrepancy in household income of minority populations as compared to the city as a whole. This discrepancy could be caused by a wide range of variables, but in any case, the end result is that a large number of minority households across all income brackets experience housing problems and/or cost burden at rates higher than their non -minority neighbors. Tables 12 through 20 identify several instances of disproportionately greater need, which are summarized below: 1. Housing Problems - At moderate incomes (50-80% AMI), African Americans and Asians face a disproportionate need (67% and 86%, respectively, compared to 53% for the jurisdiction as a whole. Finally, at middle incomes, no group has a disproportionately greater need than the jurisdiction as a whole. 2. Severe Housing Problems — African American households face disproportionately high rate of severe housing needs at three income levels: low, moderate, and middle incomes. Asians are disproportionately affected by severe housing needs at the very low and moderate level incomes. 3. Housing Cost Burdens - Two groups are disproportionately likely to be cost burdened: African Americans (53% or 2,644 households) and Hispanics (48% or 9,329 households). If they have needs not identified above, what are those needs? There is a need for greater distribution of affordable housing across all areas of the County. The primary housing -related needs are identified above and are reflected through the high number of households experiencing cost burden. An extremely low vacancy rate allows landlords, understanding that rental units will not stay vacant long, greater control. This very tight housing market disproportionately impacts low- and moderate -income households as a tight market has contributed to an increasingly expensive one. As rates increase, the portion of housing units on the market for low- and moderate -income residents becomes smaller and smaller. Compounding this, as noted above, minority households often earn less than white households. As minority households earn less and Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 66 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) have fewer options for rental units, these low- and moderate -income minority populations are vulnerable to landlord -tenant disputes or discrimination in searching for a unit to rent or purchase. Are any of those racial or ethnic groups located in specific areas or neighborhoods in your community? According to the 2010 Census, Collier County's minority population (including African American, Latino, Asian, Pacific Islander, and Native American/Alaska Native residents) is most heavily concentrated in five census tracts in the Immokalee area, where minority residents constitute over 90% of the population. The majority of the residents in these tracts are Latino, and the second largest share are African American. Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 67 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Ethnicity by Low -Income Census Tracts https:Hegis.hud.gov/cpdmaps/ Six other tracts have minority population shares above 50%. They include four tracts in Golden Gate, one in Naples Manor, and one in Naples near the Gordon River Apartments. In the census tract that includes the Gordon River Apartments, the majority of residents are African American; in the remaining tracts, Latinos make up the largest share. Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 68 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) In summary, the African American and Latino Census Block maps display unique challenges faced by the segregated living patterns in Immokalee and Golden Gate and Naples Manor, that are also in transition. The unique challenges should be considered in examining strategies to invest and preserve neighborhoods, while also fostering more inclusive choices of housing county wide. NA-35 Public Housing — 91.205(b) Introduction The Collier County Housing Authority (CCHA) is an independent authority established under state law and is separate from the general control of the County. The mission of the CCHA is to offer a choice of decent safe and diverse affordable housing, with opportunity for low- income households to achieve economic independence in living environments free from discrimination. The Authority fulfills this mission by offering a variety of subsidized housing options to low-income residents of Collier County. The CCHA owns and manages four public housing developments: 276 units of low-income housing in Farm Worker Village, 315 units of farm labor housing also in Farm Worker Village, 30 units of farm labor housing known as Collier Village and a 192-bed dormitory known as Horizon Village. In addition, the Authority serves an estimated 3100 plus people through the administration of the Section 8 rental assistance program and Family Self Sufficiency Program to provide support services targeted to low, elderly, disabled and homeless that live in Collier County. The Housing Authority also administers approximately 4 Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers. Unlike most public housing authorities, CCHA has no HUD -funded public housing units. Their primary funding is from The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 69 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Totals in Use Program Type Certificate Mod- Public Vouchers Rehab Housing Total Project - Tenant- Special Purpose Voucher based based Veterans Family Disabled Affairs Unification Supportive Program Housing # of units vouchers in use 0 0 0 440 0 438 1 1 0 Table 21- Public Housing by Program Type *includes Non -Elderly Disabled, Mainstream One -Year, Mainstream Five-year, and Nursing Home Transition Data Source: PIC (PIH Information Center) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 70 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Characteristics of Residents Program Type Certificate Mod- Rehab Public Housing Vouchers Total Project - based Tenant- based Special Purpose Voucher Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing Family Unification Program Average Annual Income 0 0 0 12,798 0 12,791 17,509 11,088 Average length of stay 0 0 0 6 0 6 1 8 Average Household size 0 0 0 2 0 2 3 1 # Homeless at admission 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 # of Elderly Program Participants (>62) 0 0 0 161 0 160 0 1 # of Disabled Families 0 0 0 105 0 104 1 0 # of Families requesting accessibility features 0 0 0 440 0 438 1 1 # of HIV/AIDS program participants 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 # of DV victims 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 71 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Table 22 — Characteristics of Public Housing Residents by Program Type Data Source: PIC (PIH Information Center) Race of Residents Program Type Race Certificate Mod- Rehab Public Housing Vouchers Total Project - based Tenant- based Special Purpose Voucher Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing Family Unification Program Disabled White 0 0 0 276 0 274 1 1 0 Black/African American 0 0 0 162 0 162 0 0 0 Asian 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 American Indian/Alaska Native 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 Pacific Islander 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 *includes Non -Elderly Disabled, Mainstream One -Year, Mainstream Five-year, and Nursing Home Transition Table 23 — Race of Public Housing Residents by Program Type Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 72 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Data Source: PIC (PIH Information Center) Ethnicity of Residents Program Type Ethnicity Certificate Mod- Public Vouchers Rehab Housing Total Project - Tenant- Special Purpose Voucher based based Veterans Family Disabled Affairs Unification Supportive Program Housing Hispanic 0 0 0 176 0 176 0 0 0 Not Hispanic 0 0 0 264 0 262 1 1 0 *includes Non -Elderly Disabled, Mainstream One -Year, Mainstream Five-year, and Nursing Home Transition Table 24 — Ethnicity of Public Housing Residents by Program Type Data Source: PIC (PIH Information Center) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 73 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Section 504 Needs Assessment: Describe the needs of public housing tenants and applicants on the waiting list for accessible units: Of the CCHA's 440 Housing Choice Voucher holders, 105 (24%) were disabled and 161(37%) were over the age of 62 according to the HUD PIC data displayed in the tables above. These resident characteristics indicate a significant need for accessible housing units. When interviewed for input related to this plan, CCHA staff underscored this need, characterizing the existing housing stock in the County as having very few accessible units. Another need of people with disabilities who may be CCHA residents or on the waiting list is transportation. Enhanced paratransit and regular bus service would assist these residents in being better able to access services. Most immediate needs of residents of Public Housing and Housing Choice voucher holders The most immediate needs of CCHA's clients are for more affordable housing options, transportation, and childcare. Despite the Housing Choice Vouchers and farmworker housing available through CCHA, there are approximately 1,000 applicants on the voucher waiting list and the list is closed. Rents in the private market are increasing and vouchers cannot keep pace, causing even those with vouchers to have difficulty finding affordable housing. Transportation, both paratransit and regular bus service is an additional need. Routes and hours are limited, making it difficult for voucher holders to access or maintain employment. There are a few programs in the area that provide assistance with the cost of childcare, which is necessary for parents of young children who need to work or look for work. These existing programs work well but cannot meet the high level of need. How do these needs compare to the housing needs of the population at large? The needs of public housing residents and housing choice voucher holders are largely consistent with the needs of the low- and moderate -income population at large. In the general population, tenants are concerned about the quality and affordability of their existing housing. Without the housing subsidies and other supports provided by CCHA, some of the affordability issues faced by the general population are even more acute. Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 74 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) NA-40 Homeless Needs Assessment — 91.205(c)lntroduction: A variety of housing and shelter models are available within the community including emergency shelter (ES), transitional housing (TH), permanent supportive housing (PSH), rapid re -housing (RRH).: This section provides an assessment of Collier County's homeless population and their needs. Data is provided by the Hunger and Homeless Coalition's 2021 Point in Time Counts (PITC) of sheltered and unsheltered homeless persons in Collier County. If data is not available for the categories "number of persons becoming and exiting homelessness each year," and "number of days that persons experience homelessness," describe these categories for each homeless population type (including chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth): The Collier County Hunger and Homeless Coalition conducts an annual Point -in -Time Count of homeless persons in Collier County in January of each year. Volunteers for the count included members of the civic and business community, homeless and formerly homeless individuals, and CoC member agency staff. Volunteers attended a training session prior to the count. The table that follows provides the results of the Hunger and Homeless Coalition's 2021 Point -in -Time Count. As shown, there were 568 homeless persons counted in 2021. In 2021, veterans constituted 5.6% (34 persons), up slightly (29 persons) from the prior year. As of 2021, the largest share of homeless persons was either persons with chronic substance abuse issues (34.85%), individuals with serious mental illness (29.75%), victims of domestic violence (21.47%), and seniors made up 8.6% of the homeless population. These numbers are indicative of a need for housing with supportive services for both persons with disabilities and persons with substance abuse issues. Youth made up a significant share of Collier County's homeless population. According to the 2021 point -in -time count, on the night of the count, 19.19% or 48 households with 109 children were homeless. Of these 109 children, 53 were in emergency shelter, 44 were in transitional shelter and 12 were unsheltered., which was 21% in 2020. In addition to the Point -in -Time Counts, homeless youth are also counted by the public schools' liaison for homeless education, who reported serving 805 homeless students. In addition to children who met HUD's definition of homeless, this count also includes children in families doubling -up with another household, unaccompanied youth staying with friends or family, and children awaiting foster care placement. A person is considered "chronically homeless" when they experience homelessness for a period of 12 consecutive months, or experience four episodes of homelessness within the past three years that total 12 or more months and have a long-term disability. Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 75 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Patterns of homelessness reflect those who are unable to self -resolve their homelessness, are experiencing chronic homelessness, and who are not being adequately served by existing homeless system resources and capacity. Data was not available for 2021, but prior year data was used to draw comparisons of chronic homelessness and to portray a snapshot of this issue within the County. The number of chronically homeless people decreased from 88 in 2019 to 80 in 2020. As a share of the total homeless population, chronically homeless persons decreased from previous years in which the share fluctuated from increased. Address coordinated assessment Coordinated Entry is a streamlined system designed to efficiently match people experiencing homelessness or those at -risk of homelessness to available housing, shelter, and services. It prioritizes those who are most in need of assistance and provides crucial information that helps the Continuum of Care strategically allocate resources. Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 76 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Nature and Extent of Homelessness 2020 Point -in -Time Count 2021 Point -in -Time Count Number Counted Share of Total Number Counted Share of Total Total 603 100% 568 100% HOMELESS STATUS Emergency Shelter 252 42% 245 43.13% Transitional Housing 183 30% 179 31.54% Unsheltered 168 28% 144 25.35% SUBPOPULATIONS Veterans 29 5% 34 5.98% Seniors (over 62) 47 8% 49 8.62% Chronically Homeless 80 13% Data Not Available Data Not Available Serious Mental Illness 127 21% 169 29.75% Chronic Substance Abuse 155 26% 198 34.85% HIV/AIDS 2 0% Data Not Available Data Not Available Victims of Domestic Violence 95 16% 122 21.47% CHILDREN AND YOUTH Children in Families 121 20% 109 19.19% Unaccompanied Youth 7 1% 183 32.21% Homeless Students 1039 N/A 805 N/A Data Source: Hunger & Homeless Coalition of Collier County; Point -in -Time Count 2020 and Point -in -Time Count 2021 Estimate the number and type of families in need of housing assistance for families with children and the families of veterans. Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 77 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) While the Point -in -Time Counts did not include the number of families with children in need of housing assistance, the 2021 count did record the number of children living in homeless families. According to the 2021 Point -in -Time Count, 109 children (under 18) were homeless, which represents 19.19% of the total homeless population counted. There were 34 or 5.98% of homeless veterans were counted. Describe the Nature and Extent of Homelessness by Racial and Ethnic Group. Race and Ethnicity data was not available for the most recent point -in -time count conducted in 2021. The most recent data available on race and ethnicity was reported in the in the 2020 CoC Homeless Assistance Programs Homeless Populations and Subpopulations Report. The report shows that in 2020 there was a total of 603 homeless persons of which 475 were White, 85 were black, 23 were Multi -racial, 6 were Asian, and 14 were American Indian or Alaska Native. The data also revealed that there were 54 Hispanic/Latino persons who were homeless. Describe the Nature and Extent of Unsheltered and Sheltered Homelessness. As of the 2021 count, a large majority of Collier County's homeless population was sheltered (74.67%), with 25.35% unsheltered. Of the sheltered population, most (43.13%) were in an emergency shelter. These percentages were increases from the 2021 point -in -count numbers for shelter and unsheltered individuals. NA-45 Non -Homeless Special Needs Assessment - 91.205 (b, d) Introduction: Non -homeless special needs characteristics describe the various subpopulations of Collier County who are not homeless but may require supportive services, including. • elderly, • frail elderly, • persons with disabilities (mental, physical, developmental), • persons with HIV/AIDS, • persons with alcohol or drug addiction, • victims of domestic violence, • persons with a criminal record, • those who have limited English proficiency, • and those who are transportation disadvantaged. Persons belonging to this population may have additional needs before, during, and after an incident in functional areas including but not limited to maintaining independence, communication, transportation, supervision, and medical care. The section below will describe why identifying the characteristics and needs of these sub -populations is essential to the planning process for these federal dollars. Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 78 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Describe the characteristics of special needs populations in your community: Both the elderly and persons with disabilities have difficulties in finding accessible and affordable housing. In addition to housing, these populations are challenged to find transportation and other supportive services. Persons with alcohol and other drug addiction problems often have difficulty finding resources and treatment facilities including the lack of a central point reference for persons seeking assistance. Persons living with HIV/AIDS are more likely to have income instability because of their medical condition and this can lead to the increased likelihood of homelessness. The needs of victims of domestic violence can vary to include shelter, transitional, and long-term housing, medical, counseling, and legal services. What are the housing and supportive service needs of these populations and how are these needs determined? The primary housing and supportive needs of these subpopulations (the elderly, frail elderly, persons with disabilities, persons with HIV/AIDS and their families, persons with alcohol or drug addiction, victims of domestic violence, and persons with a criminal record and their families) were determined by input from both service providers and the public through the survey, public meetings, and stakeholder interviews. These needs include affordable, safe housing opportunities in areas with access to transportation and paratransit, commercial and job centers, and social services including counseling, case management, and subsidies for childcare, and for education regarding fair housing rights and actions that can be taken in the event those rights are violated. Persons with disabilities often require accessible features and ground floor housing units and use of supportive/therapeutic animals. Victims of domestic violence need safe housing, removal of barriers to relocation, and protection from perpetrators. Persons with criminal records and their families may be disqualified from public housing or Section 8 rental assistance, and accordingly, assistance with housing for low-income members of this subpopulation must be provided by other nongovernmental organizations. Interviews with stakeholders and residents indicated that residents with alcohol and substance abuse histories, as well as victims of domestic violence may have criminal records. While the scope of supportive services varies based upon an individual's characteristics, the following is a list of services commonly needed by non -homeless people with special needs. These services may be provided either on- or off -site: Accessible Housing Crisis Hotline Health Care Advocacy, referral, information Education Legal Assistance Case Management Employment Training Childcare Family & Caregiver Support Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 79 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Counseling Financial assistance F Discuss the size and characteristics of the population with HIV/AIDS and their families within the Eligible Metropolitan Statistical Area: Knowing how many people diagnosed with HIV infection each year, and their stage of disease at diagnosis, is important for planning and resource allocation and for monitoring trends and disparities between groups. Similarly, monitoring HIV incidence is critical for allocating resources and evaluating the effectiveness of HIV testing and other prevention programs. Improved surveillance methods allow resources to be better directed for programs and resources to the populations most affected. According to the Florida Department of Health, there were 263 persons with HIV (PWH) compared to the state of Florida at 548.6 for all modes of exposure and age groups. The rate of diagnosis for the County was 9.8 compared to 21.6 for the state of Florida for all modes of exposure and age groups. NA-50 Non -Housing Community Development Needs — 91.215 (f) Describe the jurisdiction's need for Public Facilities: The top needs for public facilities in Collier County include the need for: • drainage improvements, • sewer improvements, • street improvements, • and water system improvements, • as senior centers, • youth centers • libraries Residents described that Collier County has put in sufficient efforts to ensure that there are equal resources like parks, public safety facilities, and recreational facilities throughout the County. The Needs Assessment included public facilities and improvements that are eligible for CDBG grant funding: facilities that principally serve low- and moderate -income residents or are located in low- and moderate -income neighborhoods. Although not limited to these needs, the following were identified as needs in the jurisdictions through focus groups and community and agency surveys: • Improving facilities for human service agencies • Increasing development of childcare facilities • Improving substandard or deteriorated properties • Making improvements to public infrastructure (streets, curbs, sewer, and stormwater systems) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 80 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Both the resident survey and the open house survey identified the need to support the acquisition and improvement of human service agency facilities as the highest priority need. This priority was also supported during stakeholder meetings. How were these needs determined? Public facilities needs were identified through a community assessment survey distributed to the public and a virtual public needs assessment meeting held during a virtual public meeting. Other resources consulted were prior plans and progress reports from Collier County. Describe the jurisdiction's need for Public Improvements: Demolition or redevelopment of blighted properties was seen by Collier County residents as an important need. Additionally, the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) has undertaken several subarea studies of bicycle and pedestrian mobility in communities throughout the County. Though only a few individual communities have been studied to date, the MPO reports have indicated significant needs for sidewalks, bike lanes, and pedestrian safety improvements. For example, in Naples Manor, the MPO report graded the community with an overall level of service of D. of 31 streets in the community, only one had sidewalks on both sides of the road. The proximity of Lely High School and Parkside Elementary School to the area heighten the need for public improvements. Improved street lighting and the addition of street furniture, such as benches and signs, was often a frequent recommendation as well. Similar findings were contained in a separate MPO report on the Immokalee area. How were these needs determined? Public improvement needs were identified through a community assessment survey distributed to the public and a virtual public needs assessment meeting held during a virtual public meeting. Other resources consulted were prior plans and progress reports from Collier County. Describe the jurisdiction's need for Public Services: Survey respondents identified the following public services as high needs: need for social services for low-income seniors, youth, mentally and physically disabled persons. a) Rental Assistance - Tenant subsidies exclusively for rental payments for eligible clients. These services could financial assistance to pay rent or utilities. b) Senior Services — Services that are exclusively provided for elderly persons with or without disabilities provided it is intended primarily to serve elderly. These services could include case management for staff working primarily with the elderly. c) Youth Services - Services that are exclusively provided for young people aged 13 to 19. For example, recreational services limited to teenagers and teen counseling programs. d) Childcare Services - Services that will benefit children (generally under age 13), including parenting skills classes. e) Services for Mentally III - Services addressing the mental health needs of residents of the community. These services could include case management for staff working primarily with the persons with mental illness. Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 81 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) f) Services for Physically Disabled - Services for the persons with disabilities, regardless of age. These services could include case management for staff working primarily with the persons with physical disabilities. How were these needs determined? Public services needs were identified through a community assessment survey distributed to the public and a virtual public needs assessment meeting held during a virtual public meeting. Other resources consulted were prior plans and progress reports from Collier County. Housing Market Analysis MA-05 Overview Housing Market Analysis Overview: The housing market analysis contained in this report was developed by using primarily using data from the American Community Survey, CHAS, and other sources noted in the tables. The following information is based on the Census' American Community Survey 2011-2015. Numbers shown represent the Collier County. The total number of housing structures shown in the "All Residential Properties by Number of Units" table includes mobile homes and recreational vehicles, some of which may not be considered housing units by HUD. Of the 163,293 units in the County, 46% consist of two or more bedrooms. One -bedroom units are the smallest category of housing units. The rest is divided into single unit attached structures and multiple unit apartment buildings. While housing opportunities can be limited by household income and purchasing power, the lack of affordable housing options can result in a significant hardship for low-income households, preventing them from meeting other basic needs. Low-income residents often have fewer financial resources available for making monthly rent or mortgage payments. Those low-income residents who do choose to purchase a home must keep even more funds available for taxes, insurance, homeowners association fees, and home maintenance and repairs. Because home ownership requires significant investment for most residents, many low- and moderate -income households choose to rent their homes as opposed to purchasing one. Under most residential property leases, this option calls for less responsibility and less investment from the home occupant than if they were to purchase a home. MA-10 Number of Housing Units — 91.210(a)&(b)(2) Introduction This section explores the number and types of housing units in Collier County and whether or not the number of available units is sufficient to meet housing demand for the County. Data provided by the 2011-2015 ACS, as shown in Table 26, reveals 48% of the County's housing stock was of single-family configuration with attached and detached unit structures. Of the Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 82 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) 163,293 units in the County, 46% consist of two or more bedrooms. One -bedroom units are the smallest category of housing units. All residential properties by number of units Property Type Number % 1-unit detached structure 68,315 42% 1-unit, attached structure 9,645 6% 2-4 units 19,295 12% 5-19 units 35,720 22% 20 or more units 19,648 12% Mobile Home, boat, RV, van, etc 10,670 7% Total 163,293 100% Table 25 — Residential Properties by Unit Number Data 2011-2015 ACS Source: Unit Size by Tenure Owners Renters Number % Number % No bedroom 170 0% 820 2% 1 bedroom 1,360 2% 4,425 13% 2 bedrooms 25,750 33% 15,680 48% 3 or more bedrooms 50,923 65% 12,022 37% Total 78,203 100% 32,947 100% Table 26 — Unit Size by Tenure Data 2011-2015 ACS Source: Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 83 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Describe the number and targeting (income level/type of family served) of units assisted with federal, state, and local programs. The County administers a variety of housing programs to assist low- and moderate -income residents to afford and maintain housing. These are funded primarily through federal Community Development Block Grant and the HOME Investment Partnerships programs, through which the County utilizes public funds to address the priority needs and specific objectives identified in the Consolidated Plan. The lack of affordable housing in the County is a major obstacle for residents. This lack of affordable housing particularly affects low- and moderate -income households, seniors, people with disabilities, single head of households, and young adults. To foster the development of affordable housing, the County utilizes HOME resources to expand housing opportunities. Provide an assessment of units expected to be lost from the affordable housing inventory for any reason, such as expiration of Section 8 contracts. There are no anticipated losses of affordable housing inventory. Some affordable housing units have been lost due to the vast changes in the housing market. Homes lost to foreclosure or those that are short sold may be acquired by a bank or investor. Many times, these are resold with no homebuyer assistance or for rental properties, so the owner -occupied market has changed as a result. This makes affordable homeowner units a scarcity. At this time, none of the publicly funded and assisted units are anticipated to be lost during the 5-year Consolidated Plan period extending through 2021. Does the availability of housing units meet the needs of the population? Consultations with housing service providers and community meetings revealed that there remains a need for one -bedroom units for individuals exiting homelessness as well as two- and three -bedroom apartments for very low and extremely low-income families. Describe the need for specific types of housing: There is a need for safe, sanitary, accessible, and affordable housing throughout the County. Specifically, there is a strong need for housing affordable to households earning less than 50% of the median income, and practical options are needed to ensure the availability of accessible units for the elderly and people with physical disabilities. The type of housing that is needed, includes varied options, whether those be single family detached or multifamily units, are needed to meet the demands of the population as well as to address the forecasted growth. Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 84 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) MA-15 Housing Market Analysis: Cost of Housing - 91.210(a) Introduction The following tables reflect the cost of both owner and renter -occupied housing in Collier County. These tables use 2011-2015 ACS data from HUD's eCon Software. There have been significant changes in housing prices in recent years which are not fully captured in this data and will be discussed at the end of this section. In Collier, the 2020 Fair Market Rent (FMR) for a two -bedroom apartment was $1,381. In order to afford this level of rent and utilities, without paying more than 30% of income on housing, a household must earn $4,603 monthly or $55,240 annually. Assuming a 40-hour work week, 52 weeks per year, a resident must work at least 124 hours per week at minimum wage to afford a two -bedroom unit. The monthly rent affordable at minimum wage for a 40-hour work week in the County is $406, less than half of the actual Fair Market Rent. The table reflecting the amount of rent paid by residents of the County demonstrates that 49.7% of rental units rent for between $500 and $999 per month, while 14.1% of rental units rent for less than $500 per month. The Housing Affordability table also shows that there were 1,275 units available to households earning below 30% of the county's HUD Area Median Family Income (HAMFI). Cost of Housing Base 2015 2019 % Change Median Home Value $315,000 $370,800 17.7% Median Contract Rent $1,177 $1,397 18.6% Table 27 — Cost of Housing Data 2005-2009 ACS (Base Year), 2015-2019 ACS (Most Recent Year) Source: 2019 Rent Paid Number % Less than $500 1,576 4.5% $500-999 5,085 14.4% $1,000-1,499 14,317 40.5% $1,500-1,999 9,694 27.4% $2,000 or more 4,692 13.2 Total 33,788 100% Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 85 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Table 28 - Rent Paid Data Source: 2015-2019 ACS Housing Affordability % Units affordable to Households earning Renter Owner 30% HAMFI 1,275 No Data 50% HAMFI 4,455 5,350 80% HAMFI 18,220 15,901 100% HAMFI No Data 23,541 Total 23,950 44,792 Table 29 — Housing Affordability Data 2011-2015 CHAS Source: Monthly Rent Monthly Rent ($) Efficiency (no bedroom) 1 Bedroom 2 Bedroom 3 Bedroom 4 Bedroom Fair Market Rent 900 1,126 1,381 1,812 2,026 High HOME Rent 900 983 1,182 1,357 1,495 Low HOME Rent 721 772 926 1,070 1,193 Table 30 — Monthly Rent Data HUD FMR and HOME Rents, 2020 Source: Is there sufficient housing for households at all income levels? There is not a sufficient supply for low- and moderate -income households in Collier County. This is evident through cost burden data that considers median household income as compared to median rental rates and home values. A significant lack of affordable housing exists particularly for the approximately one in four households that are at the low or very -low-income levels. The Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 86 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) table above shows that there is insufficient housing for extremely low- and low-income households in the County. Based on 2019 ACS data there are an estimated 6,273 very -low- income households in Collier, but only 1,275 affordable rental units at 30% HAMFI. Collier County conducts an apartment study quarterly to look at pricing trends and needs. Additionally, the County also produces a housing demand model annually to keep a pulse on the number of units needs within the County. Below is a snapshot of the report. Collier County Community and Human Services Division Quarterly Rental Apartment Inventory Survey April 2021 inrormaiion aeemea reiiaDie out snou(a De inae naenuV vennea Property Name Property Address Phone a 1/1 Rental Rate 2/2 R ental Rate 3/2 Rental Rate Taal! of Units in Development occupancy Rate Total Availabl Units as of January 22. 2021 0 Vindsong Club 11086 W inasong Ur, Naples. FL 34109 (239) 566-8801 5867 S10a3 $1.203 120 1CC C'r 3 Vhistler's Green 4700 Whistlers Green Or, Naples, FL 34116 1239) 352-2999 S876 1$1043 151,202 168 100 0`e 0 asmme Cay 100 Jasmine Circle Naples. FL - 34102 (844) 853.8441 S986 I S1139 73 98 6,^,:� 1 kxdon River Apartments 1400 Sth Ave N. Naples, FL 34102 (239)263-7700 S1150 51275 96 93.nO l 0 leer Creek 2367 Bear Creek Dr, Naples, FL 34109 (239) 514-0600 S990 51.152 lu 100 0_. 0 &ddlebrook Village 8685 Saddlebrook Ca. Naples. FL 34104 (239) 354-1122 51014 51.161 240 100 0'< 0 )spreys Landing 100 Ospreys Landing, Naples, FL 34304 (239) 261-5454 559 $3041 53.196 176 100 G: 0 411as of Capn 17725 Tara C,r, Naples. FL 341C: (239) 455.4600 S866 51041 51.203 235 1 91 5': 20 How is affordability of housing likely to change considering changes to home values and/or rents? Affordability in Collier County has decreased because the cost of housing continues to increase and the availability of land decreases. According to Zillow (2021), the typical home value of homes in Collier County is $381,207. This value is seasonally adjusted and only includes the middle price tier of homes. When compared to the 2019 ACS estimates, the County's median value was $370,800, which is a 2.8% increase. According to the National Low Income Housing Coalition's 2020 Out of Reach Report, the County's Fair Market Rent for a two -bedroom was $1,381 when compared to the 2019 ACS estimates the median rent was $1,397, which is a slight decrease of 1.14%. Another compounding factor adversely affecting affordability is unit vacancy rate. According to the 2019 ACS, the rental unit vacancy rate for Collier County was 7.1% while the owner -occupied unit vacancy rate was 3.5%. It should be noted that production of new units became available in the high -end rental market which could cause the vacancy rate to trend higher than normal overall, but the vacancy rate in the low-income rental market is less 3% according to the Quarterly Apartment Survey, conducted by Community and Human Services staff. How do HOME rents / Fair Market Rent compare to Area Median Rent? How might this impact your strategy to produce or preserve affordable housing? As actual rental rates have continued to rise, they are outpacing the HUD -established fair market rents (FMRs). The FMR and HOME high rents are substantially below the 2019 median rental Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 87 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) rates as reported by Zillow. As reflected in the following charts, the 2020 High HOME rents and Fair Market Rents for efficiencies, one-, two-, and three -bedroom units in the Naples-Immokalee- Marco Island, Florida MSA are the similar as the Area Median Rent, and comparable for four - bedroom units. However, as detailed above, housing costs in the County are increasing at higher rates than incomes. As housing construction and rehabilitation costs rise, it will be increasingly difficult to produce much needed affordable housing. Rent Reasonableness allows Collier County to provide housing for units up to 10% over the Fair Market Rent rate. The FY 2021 Naples-Immokalee-Marco Island, FL MSA FMRs for All Bedroom Sizes Final FY 2021 & Final FY 2020 FMRs By Unit Bedrooms Year Efficiency One -Bedroom Two -Bedroom Three -Bedroom Four -Bedroom FY 2021 FMR $948 $1,118 $1,376 $1,791 $1,922 FY 202 FFMR $900 $1,126 $1,381 $1,812 $2,026 HOME Rent Limits rl_S. DEPARTMENT OF RM STATE: FLORI DA 2020 HOME PROGRAM RENTS ---------------------- PROGRAM SFYICIENCY 1 SR 2 SR 3 SR 4 SR 5 SR 6 SR Naples-Tmmokalee-Mnrca Islend, FL MSA LOW HOME RENT LIMIT 721 772 926 1070 1193 1317 1440 HIGH HOME RENT LIMIT 900 983 1182 1357 1495 1631 1767 Discussion As housing costs continue to rise, so does the demand for housing that is affordable to low- income households, particularly rental housing for the very low and extremely low-income households. The County will need to consider new and innovative ways to meet this demand. MA-20 Housing Market Analysis: Condition of Housing — 91.210(a) Introduction The age and condition of a county's housing stock are important variables in assessing the overall characteristics of the local housing market. This section will review important data about the county's housing stock. The older housing stock, particularly older rental housing often has code and deferred maintenance issues that can impact the longevity of the housing structure which in turn impacts the housing supply in terms of accessibility and affordability. Definitions Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 88 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Standard Condition: No major structural defects; adequate plumbing and kitchen facilities; appearance which does not create a blighting influence; and the house meets additional, more stringent, local standards and building codes, including lead -based paint clearance. Such units may be eligible for housing rehabilitation funding if interior conditions are such that the HUD Section 8 Housing Quality Standards or other standards are not met. Examples of ways in which the interiors of such homes might be rehabilitated include the replacement of heating systems, electrical system repairs or upgrades, plumbing system repairs or upgrades, energy efficiency improvements, and accessibility improvements. Substandard Condition but Suitable for Rehabilitation: This category describes dwelling units that do not meet standard conditions but that are both financially and structurally feasible for rehabilitation. Such units may be lacking complete plumbing or kitchen facilities and/or may have exterior elements in need of repair (e.g., a roof in need of replacement, siding in need of repair or replacement, or a missing/failing foundation), and the unit value must exceed the cost of the repairs or upgrades required to bring it to standard condition. Substandard Condition but Suitable for Rehabilitation: The nature of the substandard condition makes rehabilitation both financially and structurally feasible. Such units will typically have an improvement value that is less than the cost of addressing the habitability and exterior elements that cause its classification as "substandard," or will be considered to be unoccupiable for reasons of safety by the county's building official. Housing Conditions: Condition of units is assessed using the same criteria as in the Needs Assessment. This includes: 1) lacks complete plumbing facilities, 2) lacks complete kitchen facilities, 3) more than one person per room, 4) cost burden (amount of income allocated to housing) is greater than 30%, and 5) complies with applicable building code standards. Condition of Units Condition of Units Owner -Occupied Renter -Occupied Number % Number % With one selected Condition 22,585 29% 15,530 47% With two selected Conditions 839 1% 2,210 7% With three selected Conditions 25 0% 50 0% With four selected Conditions 0 0% 0 0% No selected Conditions 54,760 70% 15,135 46% Total 78,209 100% 32,925 100% Table 31- Condition of Units Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 89 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Data 2011-2015 ACS Source: Year Unit Built Year Unit Built Owner -Occupied Renter -Occupied Number % Number % 2000 or later 25,049 32% 9,025 27% 1980-1999 40,975 52% 16,525 50% 1950-1979 11,674 15% 7,093 22% Before 1950 509 1% 277 1% Total 78,207 100% 32,920 100% Table 32 — Year Unit Built Data 2011-2015 CHAS Source: Risk of Lead -Based Paint Hazard Risk of Lead -Based Paint Hazard Owner -Occupied Renter -Occupied Number % Number % Total Number of Units Built Before 1980 12,183 16% 7,370 22% Housing Units build before 1980 with children present 10,416 13% 4,893 15% Table 33 — Risk of Lead -Based Paint Data 2011-2015 ACS (Total Units) 2011-2015 CHAS (Units with Children present) Source: Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 90 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Vacant Units Suitable for Rehabilitation Not Suitable for Rehabilitation Total Vacant Units 0 0 81,711 Abandoned Vacant Units 0 0 0 REO Properties 0 0 0 Abandoned REO Properties 0 0 0 Table 34 - Vacant Units Need for Owner and Rental Rehabilitation The age of the housing stock in Collier County will continue to have a significant impact on general housing conditions in the area. The 2019 ACS data shows that only 16.73% of the county's housing stock was built prior to 1970. Owner and renter households, especially those located in low-income target neighborhoods will be in need of rehabilitation assistance to maintain their homes. As housing ages, maintenance costs rise, which can present significant costs for low- and moderate- income homeowners. This also poses a threat to low- and moderate- income tenants who are not able to maintain close communications with their landlords or property managers who may be out of state when repairs are needed. Estimated Number of Housing Units Occupied by Low- or Moderate -Income Families with LBP Hazards Exposure to lead -based paint represents one of the most significant environmental threats from a housing perspective. Lead is a highly toxic metal that may cause a range of health problems for adults, and especially for children. The major source of lead exposure comes from lead - contaminated dust found in deteriorating buildings. Many residential properties built before 1978 contain lead -based paint. Unfortunately, measuring the exact number of housing units with lead -based paint hazards is difficult. HUD regulations regarding lead -based paint apply to all federally assisted housing. Low-income households that earn between 0-50% Median Family Income (MFI) are least able to afford well maintained housing and, therefore, are often at greater risk of lead poisoning. Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 91 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) MA-25 Public and Assisted Housing — 91.210(b) Introduction Collier County Housing Authority (CCHA) provides housing assistance to low-income residents through the management of the areas Housing Choice Voucher Program - Section 8. This program is income based and the eligibility requirements are set by HUD. The CCHA has been committed to providing safe, decent, and affordable housing to low-income residents in Collier County since 1966. The CCHA administers a number of programs, such as the Far Worker Housing, the Housing Choice Voucher Program, and the Family Self -Sufficiency Program, to promote self-sufficiency and economic opportunity for local residents. The data tables presented in this section were pre -populated by the HUD eCon Planning Suite. In many instances, the data is either incorrect or out of date; however, no changes can be made. Where data were available, supplemental tables are provided. Totals Number of Units Program Type Certificate Mod- Public Vouchers Rehab Housing Total Project Tenant Special Purpose Voucher -based - Veterans Family Disabled based. Affairs Unification Supportive Program Housing # of units vouchers 0 0 0 440 0 0 0 0 0 available # of accessible 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 units *includes Non -Elderly Disabled, Mainstream One -Year, Mainstream Five-year, and Nursing Home Transition Table 35 — Total Number of Units by Program Type Data PIC (PIH Information Center) Source: Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 92 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Describe the supply of public housing developments: The CCHA owns and manages four public housing developments: 276 units of low-income housing in Farm Worker Village, 315 units of farm labor housing also in Farm Worker Village, 30 units of farm labor housing known as Collier Village and a 192-bed dormitory known as Horizon Village. In addition, CCHA serves an over 3,100 persons through the administration of the Section 8 rental assistance program and Family Self Sufficiency Program to provide support services to low, elderly, disabled, and homeless persons living in Collier County. Describe the number and physical condition of public housing units in the jurisdiction, including those that are participating in an approved Public Housing Agency Plan: HUD's Real Estate Assessment Center conducts physical inspections of properties that are owned, insured, or subsidized by HUD, including public housing and multifamily assisted housing. However, because the public housing units in Collier County are funded by USDA and not HUD, they are neither inspected by the Real Estate Assessment Center nor are they covered by a Public Housing Agency Plan. The Housing Choice Vouchers are tenant -based and the properties at which the vouchers are used vary significantly in physical condition. Public Housing Condition Public Housing Development Average Inspection Score n/a n/a Table 36 - Public Housing Condition Describe the restoration and revitalization needs of public housing units in the jurisdiction: The CCHA was awarded a SHIP Rental Acquisition grant to buy properties in Naples to rent to low-income families. This project will be financed in part by the State Housing Initiative Program (SHIP) and the Collier County Community and Human Services Division. The CCHA has also applied for rehabilitation grant through the Collier County Community and Human Services Division to rehab older units. Additionally, the Housing Authority also receive money from the HOME and CDBG program to add HVAC units in Immokalee. Describe the public housing agency's strategy for improving the living environment of low - and moderate -income families residing in public housing: The CCHA also sponsors and supports self-sufficiency programs focused at helping their residents improve their economic situation and quality of living. The programs, ROSS and FSS, are voluntary self-sufficiency programs that provide participating families the opportunity to identify needs, improve skill sets, and work towards life goals, economic independence, and housing self- sufficiency programs provide families with: • A plan specifically tailored to their family or individual goals. Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 93 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) • A link to community organizations geared towards education, job training and placement programs, computer and financial literacy, and increased self-sufficiency. • An advocate and supporter to help residents work through barriers preventing self- sufficiency. Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 94 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) MA-30 Homeless Facilities and Services — 91.210(c) Introduction Collier County partners with the Hunger & Homeless Coalition of Collier County to address the needs of the homeless individuals and families or at risk of homelessness. There are multiple organizations providing services in Collier County, such as homeless assistance providers, victim service providers, nonprofit organizations, public housing agencies, mental health agencies and government -based organizations. The Hunger & Homeless Coalition of Collier Coalition is a working group whose mission is to "support the planning, delivery and coordination of high - quality services to the hungry, homeless, and those at risk of homelessness in our community." The group also works to provide programs and services related to housing, mental and physical health, nutrition, clothing, and education. Data for the HUD -formatted table below was taken from the available information from the CoC that follows. Facilities and Housing Targeted to Homeless Households Emergency Shelter Beds Transitional Permanent Supportive Housing Housing Beds Beds Year- Voucher / Current & Current & Under Round Seasonal / New New Development Beds Overflow (Current & Beds New) Households with Adult(s) and 92 0 54 0 0 Child(ren) Households with Only Adults 140 0 132 30 0 Chronically Homeless 0 0 0 0 0 Households Veterans 0 0 0 0 0 Unaccompanied Youth 23 0 8 0 0 Table 37 - Facilities and Housing Targeted to Homeless Households Describe mainstream services, such as health, mental health, and employment services to the extent those services are used to complement services targeted to homeless persons Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 95 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Many social service agencies in Collier County provide benefits to homeless individuals and families to address homelessness. These services are essential to facilitate the process and serve the needs of those who have already become homeless. These organizations provide many services to their clientele, including but not limited to counseling, case management, life skills training, financial literacy classes, and victim advocacy, all of which help residents to develop the skills and knowledge to transition into permanent housing or independent living and to maintain steady employment. The goal of providing supportive services is self-sufficiency. While case management services do exist within programs, some stakeholders noted that tenancy supports are underfunded and are not available on the scale needed to serve people in PSH and RRH. Robust tenancy supports would improve housing -related outcomes across the system. Discussions are also ongoing regarding hiring FTE staff including case managers, licensed mental health case managers, peer specialist and licensed substance abuse case managers to coordinate services or provide onsite services. List and describe services and facilities that meet the needs of homeless persons, particularly chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth. If the services and facilities are listed on screen SP-40 Institutional Delivery Structure or screen MA-35 Special Needs Facilities and Services, describe how these facilities and services specifically address the needs of these populations. Collier County has a broad network of homeless providers offering emergency shelter, transitional housing, employment services, legal services, food, veteran's services, medical services, financial assistance, eviction prevention services, and assistance with alcohol and drug dependency. The following agencies listed provide services specifically for homeless people: The Shelter for Abused Women and Children in Naples is the only domestic violence center in Naples. It includes emergency shelter (where stays average 29 days) and a transitional housing program (where residents can live for up to 2 years). Other services include a confidential hotline, safety planning, counseling and support groups in English and Spanish, court advocacy and assistance with daily needs such as food, clothing, toiletries, and household items. St. Matthew's House operates several facilities in Collier County, including emergency and transitional housing in Naples, an emergency shelter in Immokalee (Immokalee Friendship House), and transitional supportive apartments for persons with substance abuse or mental health needs. Other services include a food pantry, thrift store, counseling and case management, and access to referrals for medical, mental health, and substance abuse needs through partnerships with other organizations in Collier County. The Salvation Army and St. Vincent De Paul provides financial assistance for food, shelter, and other aid to Collier County residents who meet certain income criteria. Youth Haven is a 24-hour residential shelter for children removed from their homes due to abuse, neglect, or abandonment. In addition to a 23-bed emergency shelter, Youth Haven offers a child Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 96 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) and family counseling center, in -home parenting classes, case management, and a teen drop -in center with showers, laundry facilities, and meals. Typical length of stays range from 45 to 60 days until children are placed in foster care or with a relative. Providence House provides a faith -based, transitional housing and self-sufficiency program for motivated women with young children who are homeless or at risk of being homeless. These women lack the long-term support necessary to acquire the assets foundational to re- establishing their families. The two-year accountability program not only encourages the development of self -efficacy, but it also provides women and their children with resources that they need to become independent. Providence House also offers case management, life skills training, and counseling referrals. Wounded Warriors assists with the needs of Veterans and their families, with the focus on education, housing, and mental health. The Hunger and Homeless Coalition of Collier County estimates that there are 80-90 homeless Veterans in Collier County. Wounded Warriors of Collier County is dedicated to ending Veteran homelessness in Collier County by employing various housing models. MA-35 Special Needs Facilities and Services — 91.210(d) Introduction This section describes the housing and social service needs of Collier County's special populations including: • Elderly, • frail elderly, • domestic violence victims, • residents with diagnosis of HIV/AIDS, • residents with substance abuse, mental health, or disability diagnosis. The special needs population includes individuals having mobility impairments, disabilities, or that require supportive services. Typically, this population has a severe or persistent mental illness, development, and physical disabilities. Several organizations provide facilities and services for special needs populations in Collier County. Including the elderly, frail elderly, persons with disabilities (mental, physical, developmental), persons with alcohol or other drug addictions, persons with HIV/AIDS and their families, public housing residents and any other categories the jurisdiction may specify, and describe their supportive housing needs The supportive housing needs of Collier County's special needs sub -populations (the elderly, frail elderly, persons with disabilities, persons with HIV/AIDS and their families, persons with alcohol Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 97 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) or drug addiction, victims of domestic violence, and persons with a criminal record and their families) mirrors the housing needs of the general population. Their needs include affordable and accessible housing opportunities, job centers, access to transportation, and most importantly to these subpopulations is social and supportive services to assist them in accessing programs available to them. Services for these populations include counseling, case management, ADL support, and education regarding fair housing rights and actions that can be taken in the event those rights are violated. Elderly and Frail Elderly - Much of the elderly population in Collier County need a range of community -based services, i.e., social, physical, mental health, case management, chronic disease management, supportive housing, and other services that assist people to remain living in the community. Community -based long term care services include in -home supportive services; home health care; adult day services; paratransit services; home -delivered meals; supportive services in a hotel; care in residential care facilities, including board and care and assisted living; and other health and social services. Long term care and supportive services can be provided in home and community -based settings, as well as in institutional settings, depending on need and choice. Collier County also has a comprehensive meals program that provides congregate, and home delivered meals. The case management services for seniors program also allows seniors to participate in the EHEAP for the elderly to help with electric services. Persons with Disabilities - Persons with disabilities often require accessible features and ground floor housing units and support animals. Available housing forthis subpopulation is limited within Collier County, thus limiting housing choice. Units are available for this population; however, there is greater demand for units for people with chronic mental illness for units for people with physical or developmental disabilities. Funding from the State Housing Incentive Partnership (SHIP) programs allows Community Assisted & Supported Living (CASE) and ROOF Collier County to create supported living homes for adults with disabilities. Persons with Drug Addiction and Criminal Records may be disqualified from housing opportunities public housing or Section 8 rental assistance, and accordingly, assistance with housing for low-income members of this subpopulation must be provided by other nongovernmental organizations. Survivors of Domestic Violence need safe housing, removal of barriers to relocation, and protection from perpetrators. Housing providers need to be aware of and adhere to protocols outlined in the Violence Against Women's Act. Persons with HIV/AIDS and their families supportive housing needs include housing developed with HOPWA funding and other dedicated resources. Persons living with HIV/AIDS often have medical concerns that can severely impact their ability to earn wages sufficient to maintain adequate housing. HOPWA funding is not received directly in Collier County. Public Housing Residents need supportive social services to aid families in becoming self- sufficient. These services include financial counseling, housing counseling, credit counseling, down -payment assistance programs, job training and placement, and access to transportation. Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 98 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Describe programs for ensuring that persons returning from mental and physical health institutions receive appropriate supportive housing Public systems or institutions (i.e., jails, prisons, hospitals, child welfare, mental health facilities, etc.) often release individuals directly into homelessness. Supportive housing has been identified as one of the greatest needs for special needs subpopulations after being discharged from mental and physical health institutions. In Collier County, housing referrals are often made to the David Lawrence Center a nonprofit that owns and operates treatment programs and supportive housing for people with mental health and substance abuse disorders. Community members reported a need for community -living, group home type housing for those transitioning from inpatient care to more independent living situations. One such agency providing that service is Community Assisted & Supported Living (CASE). Specify the activities that the jurisdiction plans to undertake during the next year to address the housing and supportive services needs identified in accordance with 91.215(e) with respect to persons who are not homeless but have other special needs. Link to one-year goals. 91.315(e) Collier County will prioritize increasing the supply of affordable housing that includes supportive services for special needs subpopulations which include families with children, seniors, ex - offenders, people with HIV/AIDS, victims of domestic violence, people with drug and alcohol addictions, people who are evicted or foreclosed, people with physical and mental disabilities, veterans, youth and young adults, and youth aging out of foster care. The county will give preference to projects that are rich in amenities and opportunity to include proximity to grocery stores, public transportation, and job centers. Additionally, Collier County will continue to support programs that provide rental subsidies to low-income housing households to make existing units affordable; providing down payment assistance to eligible low and moderate - income homebuyers; and supporting community efforts to fund the affordable housing trust fund. However, there is not a consistent revenue stream to support funding the trust fund. Collier County also will focus on increasing the supply of accessible units for persons with disabilities. To address special housing and supportive needs, Collier County has identified the following one- year goals and plans to fund Tenant -Based Rental Assistance, supporting new construction of rental and homeowner housing, and providing assistance to homebuyers. HOME funds will be directed to projects that address the needs of persons who have an identified special need. HOME and CDBG funds have been utilized to support a range of developments to support special needs populations. For entitlement/consortia grantees: Specify the activities that the jurisdiction plans to undertake during the next year to address the housing and supportive services needs identified in accordance with 91.215(e) with respect to persons who are not homeless but have other special needs. Link to one-year goals. (91.220(2)) Collier County will prioritize increasing the supply of affordable housing that includes supportive services for special needs subpopulations. The county will give preference to projects that are rich in amenities and opportunity to include proximity to grocery stores, public transportation, Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 99 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) and job centers. Since many services available to special needs populations are offered through nonprofit agencies within the community, there is a need for these agencies to strengthen collaboration among service providers across the region to ensure appropriate delivery of services. To address special housing and supportive needs, Collier County has identified the following one-year goals and plans to fund Tenant -Based Rental Assistance, supporting new construction of rental and homeowner housing, and providing assistance to homebuyers. As it relates to housing, Collier County has allocated HOME funds for future development of affordable housing. Projects will be solicited through an application process and are strongly encouraged to include a set -aside for special needs populations. Collier County will continue our SHIP home repair programs that are frequently used by elderly persons, persons with disabilities, veterans, and families with children. As it relates to supportive services, the County will continue to provide CDBG funds for human services related to food assistance, social services, and assistance for victims of domestic violence and children at risk of child abuse. MA-40 Barriers to Affordable Housing — 91.210(e) Negative Effects of Public Policies on Affordable Housing and Residential Investment The Collier County Land Development Code, as amended through November 20, 2020, and the Naples Land Development Code, as amended through December 16, 2020, were each reviewed and evaluated against a list of common fair housing issues. The zoning regulations are permissive and allow for flexibility as to the most common fair housing issues. Neither jurisdiction received a high -risk score on any of the fair housing issues evaluated. However, the County and Naples received medium risk scores on certain issues where the zoning regulations still have the potential to negatively impact fair and affordable housing, and where improvements to the rules and policies could be made to protect the fair housing rights of the County's residents more fully. On paper, the residential zoning criteria for the jurisdictions surveyed are not inherently prohibitive, and yet there is general consensus among residents, planning officials, housing advocates, and other stakeholders that Collier County and Naples suffer from an affordability gap for both affordable and workforce housing. This problem will only grow as rent and home prices are expected to continue to trend upward. Based on 2015 projections provided by the University of Florida's Shimberg Center for Housing Studies, the County's Affordable Housing Advisory Committee estimates that 43% of Collier households pay more than 30% of their income (the limit considered financially healthy) on housing related expenses, and 22% of households spend more than half of their income on housing. There are some development costs that local governments simply cannot control, such as materials and labor costs. However, there are other costs which government regulations directly impact: for example, raw land costs (via minimum lot size requirements), permitting costs, and impact fees. By reducing these costs, the hope is that there would be a trickle -down effect which would in turn make development of affordable housing more feasible. In the context of the area's already costly rental and housing market, development standards may be a barrier to obtaining workforce and affordable housing for low to moderate income families and should be evaluated and tailored to the area's estimation of affordability, that is the extent to which enough housing Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 100 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) units of different costs can be developed to provide each household with a unit it can afford (based on HUD's 30%-of-income standard). Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 101 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) MA-45 Non -Housing Community Development Assets — 91.215 (f) Introduction In determining priorities for the allocation of federal funds, the Collier County has recognized the need to foster a competitive local economy that expands economic opportunities for present and future residents. A unique economic development trend in Collier County is the high number of seasonal residents who own property in the area. This phenomenon can cause data to trend in ways that do not truly reflect the economy year-round. This section describes the local workforce, the nature of current employment, and activities that coordinate economic development activities across local and regional agencies. Economic Development Market Analysis Business Activity Business by Sector Number of Workers Number of Jobs Share of Workers Share of Jobs Jobs less workers Agriculture, Mining, Oil & Gas Extraction 3,969 4,573 3 4 1 Arts, Entertainment, Accommodations 24,234 24,862 21 22 1 Construction 10,554 11,915 9 10 1 Education and Health Care Services 17,850 19,482 16 17 1 Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate 6,972 6,368 6 6 -1 Information 1,522 1,382 1 1 0 Manufacturing 3,326 3,164 3 3 0 Other Services 5,299 5,613 5 5 0 Professional, Scientific, Management Services 7,525 6,333 7 6 -1 Public Administration 0 0 0 0 0 Retail Trade 17,653 16,551 16 15 -1 Transportation and Warehousing 1,866 1,284 2 1 -1 Wholesale Trade 3,817 3,696 3 3 0 Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 102 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Business by Sector Number Number Share of Share of Jobs less of of Jobs Workers Jobs workers Workers Total 104,587 105,223 -- -- -- Table 38 - Business Activity Data 2011-2015 ACS (Workers), 2015 Longitudinal Employer -Household Dynamics (Jobs) Source: Labor Force Total Population in the Civilian Labor Force 146,855 Civilian Employed Population 16 years and over 135,345 Unemployment Rate 7.85 Unemployment Rate for Ages 16-24 20.22 Unemployment Rate for Ages 25-65 5.21 Table 39 - Labor Force Data 2011-2015 ACS Source: Occupations by Sector Number of People Management, business and financial 27,350 Farming, fisheries, and forestry occupations 6,120 Service 18,358 Sales and office 34,130 Construction, extraction, maintenance, and repair 16,960 Production, transportation, and material moving 5,985 Table 40 — Occupations by Sector Data 2011-2015 ACS Source: Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 103 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Travel Time Travel Time Number Percentage < 30 Minutes 82,289 67% 30-59 Minutes 34,824 28% 60 or More Minutes 6,520 5% Total 123,633 100% Table 41 - Travel Time Data 2011-2015 ACS Source: Education: Educational Attainment by Employment Status (Population 16 and Older) Educational Attainment In Labor Force Civilian Employed Unemployed Not in Labor Force Less than high school graduate 16,669 2,084 6,458 High school graduate (includes equivalency) 30,610 2,064 10,135 Some college or Associate's degree 28,220 2,264 8,455 Bachelor's degree or higher 31,780 1,404 9,355 Table 42 - Educational Attainment by Employment Status Data 2011-2015 ACS Source: Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 104 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Educational Attainment by Age Age 18-24 yrs 25-34 yrs 35-44 yrs 45-65 yrs 65+ yrs Less than 9th grade 678 3,615 3,605 6,625 5,299 9th to 12th grade, no diploma 3,765 3,503 3,552 4,269 4,114 High school graduate, GED, or alternative 8,899 9,663 9,969 23,170 22,075 Some college, no degree 6,984 5,179 4,975 15,770 17,695 Associate's degree 1,268 3,017 3,087 6,923 5,385 Bachelor's degree 1,331 6,110 5,975 15,235 18,920 Graduate or professional degree 14 1,874 3,135 10,195 16,160 Table 43 - Educational Attainment by Age Data 2011-2015 ACS Source: Educational Attainment - Median Earnings in the Past 12 Months Educational Attainment Median Earnings in the Past 12 Months Less than high school graduate $22,483 High school graduate (includes equivalency) $31,255 Some college or Associate's degree $37,184 Bachelor's degree $51,407 Graduate or professional degree $64,551 Table 44 - Median Earnings in the Past 12 Months Data 2011-2015 ACS Source: Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 105 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Based on the Business Activity table above, what are the major employment sectors within your jurisdiction? Collier County's largest employment sectors are: • Sales and Office (34,130) • Management, Business, and Finance (27,350) • Service (18,358) Describe the workforce and infrastructure needs of the business community: Collier County's workforce needs is heavily dependent on the hospitality industry with more than 20% of the County's workforce employed in that industry. Education and healthcare represent the second largest sector of jobs in Collier County. The local economy will depend on a strong labor pool skilled in these industries. The County should continue job training and employment services and seek to increase community college attendance among residents in poorer areas including Immokalee, Bayshore residents, and residents residing in the RCAP/ECAP region. Describe any major changes that may have an economic impact, such as planned local or regional public or private sector investments or initiatives that have affected or may affect job and business growth opportunities during the planning period. Describe any needs for workforce development, business support or infrastructure these changes may create. The County'stravel and tourism industrywas hard hitwith the effects of the Coronavirus Pandemic. Prior to the pandemic the County had a strong business climate with many successful CEOs, low property tax rates, wealthier citizens with high median incomes, and the state of Florida has high ranking for a strong business environment. Residents will need skills in business development and management and job training and skills in various service industries including health care, education. While the arts, entertainment, tourism, and food services industries were the hardest hit during the pandemic, additional job training in new fields will become apparent as the County continues to recover from mandatory closures. How do the skills and education of the current workforce correspond to employment opportunities in the jurisdiction? A skillful and well-educated workforce is essential to attracting and retaining employers and growing the County's economy. Residents with a bachelor's degree or higher were less likely to be unemployed or not in the labor force than residents with less educational attainment. It is also important to note that while educational attainment shows that most county residents have educational attainment above a high school diploma, but most jobs are in sectors that do not require degrees. It will be important for the county to strengthen its ability to attract companies to open, relocate, or expand in Collier County. Describe any current workforce training initiatives, including those supported by Workforce Investment Boards, community colleges and other organizations. Describe how these efforts will support the jurisdiction's Consolidated Plan. Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 106 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Career Source Southwest Florida provides individuals with career development resources in an effort to provide skilled workforce for businesses. The organization offers various assessments, workshops, and services to equip job seekers with the necessary skills to achieve self-sufficient employment. The work of Career Source Southwest Florida supports the Consolidated Plan by increasing job readiness and job opportunities in priority neighborhoods, encouraging microenterprise, and offering job skills and work programs to youth. Does your jurisdiction participate in a Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS)? The Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council prepares a CEDS (the current CEDS is 2018- 2022) to document economic development goals and priorities of the Southwest Florida region. If so, what economic development initiatives are you undertaking that may be coordinated with the Consolidated Plan? If not, describe other local/regional plans or initiatives that impact economic growth. Major program goals for the 2017-2022 goals are divided into six key areas: talent supply and education, quality of life & quality places, infrastructure and growth leadership, civic and governing systems, business climate & competitiveness, and innovation & economic development. CEDS goals include, but are not limited to: • Collier County has instituted a one cent sales tax to construct a high-tech center. • Provide sufficient funding and encourage flexibility to allow regional stakeholders to address local needs in education, training, and workforce development. • Ensure educational systems and workforce training that support innovation and creativity. • Protect natural resources to support quality environment and eco-tourism. • Develop projects that improve the region's quality of life. • Increase the supply of workforce housing in the region. • Expand arts and cultural identity. • Develop transportation systems to support a prosperous, globally competitive economy while minimizing impacts to the natural environment. • Promote available ready -sites and buildings. • Improve public/private/civic cooperation, collaboration, and communication of the Region's economic strategies. • Improve regional coordination of economic development, land use, infrastructure, water, and natural resource decision making. • Support the region's growing elderly population. • Develop projects and programs that support existing and new business. • Increase investment in business development and placement in the Region. • Monitor CEDS Performance Measures. • Provide funding for ongoing economic development activities. • Provide technical assistance and use new technology to promote job growth. Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 107 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) • Build seamless information technology infrastructure. • Encourage alternative energy production and green product industries. • Brand the region as a hub to attract and retain entrepreneurs. MA-50 Needs and Market Analysis Discussion Are there areas where households with multiple housing problems are concentrated? (include a definition of "concentration") As show in the map, the highest concentrations of low-income households (greater than 80%) with severe problems are Immokalee, and there are two targeted CRAs in the Bays hore-Gateway Triangle Area and Immokalee. There are significantly higher percentages of low-income households located in census tracts 0104.05, 0104.18, and 0104.20 within Collier County. Collier County -% of LI Households with Any of 4 Severe Housing Problems Source: HUD CPD Maps, https://egis.hud.gov/cpdmaps/ Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 108 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Collier County Census Tracts Source : www.geomap.ffiec.gov Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 109 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Are there any areas in the jurisdiction where racial or ethnic minorities or low-income families are concentrated? (include a definition of "concentration") An area of racial or ethnic concentration is defined as one in which the minority population share is 20% higher than the group's Countywide average. There are a significant higher percentage of White residents throughout the County. White Population Concentration Source: HUD CPD Maps, https://egis.hud.gov/cpdmaps/ Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 110 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) What are the characteristics of the market in these areas/neighborhoods? Collier County targets resources in low -moderate income census block groups to meet regulatory requirements for CDBG grant funds and to target areas with the highest level of needs. These areas are considered "target areas" for use of HUD grant funds for area improvements, such as public infrastructure or facility improvements. HUD funds may also be spent outside of these targeted areas, as long as they provide services, improvements, affordable housing, or other benefits for low- and moderate -income households or special needs populations. Collier County - Median Home Value Source: HUD CPD Maps, https://egis.hud.gov/cpdmaps/ Are there any community assets in these areas/neighborhoods? The Collier Resource Center exists solely to help families and adults obtain assistance to navigate the maze of health and human service organizations. They provide information and referrals in many areas and make every effort to match residents with the most appropriate and adequate resources by providing personalized case management. There are resources for fundamental Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY ill OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) necessities, medical and mental health services, services for people with disabilities, elderly and assistance for children, youth, and families. Are there other strategic opportunities in any of these areas? The Strategic Plan provided below identifies priority needs and geographic focus areas for community development and housing efforts in Collier County over the next five years. These priorities are based on findings from the need's assessment and market analysis, along with public input received through a variety of engagement methods. The County will continue to concentrate CDBG, ESG, and HOME spending on public safety activities, housing initiatives, and public service activities. Projects and programs funded using CDBG, ESG, and HOME funds will meet program eligibility requirements, generate long term improvements for low- and moderate -income residents and communities, and help address federal, state, and local priorities, such as expanding fair housing choice and sustainability. This Strategic Plan also identifies market conditions which may influence the use of HUD grant funds, the resources expected to be available to meet community needs, and the structure in place for delivering services. Strategies for addressing public housing, homelessness, lead -based paint hazards, and poverty are summarized. Finally, the Plan outlines barriers to housing affordability in Collier County and will provide a plan to monitor performance and compliance for the CDBG, ESG, and HOME programs. The Strategic Plan will guide the use of CDBG and HOME in Collier County over the next five years and is guided by HUD's three overarching goals that are applied according to the County's needs. These goals are: • To provide decent housing by preserving the affordable housing stock, increasing the availability of affordable housing, reducing discriminatory barriers, increasing the supply of supportive housing for those with special needs, and transitioning homeless persons and families into housing. • To provide a suitable living environment through safer, more livable neighborhoods, greater integration of low- and moderate -income residents throughout the County, increased housing opportunities, and reinvestment in deteriorating neighborhoods. • To expand economic opportunities through more jobs paying self-sufficient wages, homeownership opportunities, development activities that promote long-term community viability, and the empowerment of low- and moderate -income persons to achieve self- sufficiency. Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 112 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) MA-60 Broadband Needs of Housing occupied by Low- and Moderate -Income Households - 91.210(a)(4), 91.310(a)(2) Describe the need for broadband wiring and connections for households, including low- and moderate -income households and neighborhoods. For many Americans, access to computers and high-speed Internet connections in an integral part of their everyday lives. As most of information, services, and resources have transitioned to online access, digital inequality has a direct impact on low-income household's social inequality. According to HUD's Office of Policy Development, in the Digital Inequality and Low -Income Households Report, the disparate access to broadband can correlate with the inequality of income, education, race, and ethnicity. As part of the 2008 Broadband Data Improvement Act, the U.S. Census Bureau began asking about computer and Internet use in the 2018 American Community Survey (ACS). Federal agencies use these statistics to measure and monitor the nationwide development of broadband networks and to allocate resources intended to increase access to broadband technologies, particularly among groups with traditionally low levels of access. No longer a luxury, high speed internet access is relied upon for residents to fully engage in an expanding array of employment, education, training, financial and healthcare services. Internet access is relatively high but not universal for all households in Immokalee. Computer and Internet Use in the Collier County Total: 144,354 (x) 144,172 (x) 140,578 (x) Has a computer: 133,979 92.8% 134,294 93.1% 134,309 95.5% With dial -up Internet subscription alone 124,560 86.3% 125,339 86.9% 125,181 89/0 ° With a broadband Internet subscription 123,909 85.8% 125,151 86.8% 124,786 88.8/0 ° Without an Internet subscription 19,794 13.7% 18,833 13.1% 15,397 11/0 ° No computer 10,375 7.2% 9,878 6.9% 3,269 4.5% Source: American Community Survey Reports, U.S. Census Bureau, www.data.census.gov Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 113 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Describe the need for increased competition by having more than one broadband Internet service provider serve the jurisdiction. Throughout the United States, there is a significant digital divide; a gap between those who have ready access to the internet and computers and those who do not. The divide is perpetuated by limitations that are geographical as well as financial, where persons cannot afford to pay a monthly service fee for Broadband service (an internet connection fast enough to stream a video). Nationwide, less than half of households living on or under $20,000 are connected. This lack of internet access in communities supports a deficit in opportunity, education, and other prospects.' The figure below shows the number of fixed broadband providers. Number of Fixed Residential Broadband Providers I I I i 0 1 2 3 4 6 12 or more Broadband Technology All Cahle, Fiber, Fixed Wireless, Satellite, Other Speed >_ 25l3 Mbps Dace lec. 2019(Intest public refeuse) While the figure shows the number of providers available, it does not Provider Tech 93 Orlando Telephone l Company, Inc. 13 Comcast Corporation Cable oCenturyLink, Inc. Al oViaSat, Inc. Satellite o Hughes Network Systems, Satellite LLC oCenturyl-ink, Inc. ADSL reflect the household level usage of broadband. From a fair housing oVSATSystems, PLC satellite perspective, ensuring that residential broadband is available to housing projects both within and in the outskirts of the county will support community viability and improve the quality of life for residents. 1 Vick, Karl. March 2017. The Digital Divide: A Quarter of the Nation is Without Broadband. Time. Available at: https://time.com/4718032/the-digital-divide/ Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 114 Cl Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Number of Fixed Residential Broadband Providers 0 1 2 3 4 6 12 or more Fixed Broadband Deployment, 2021, https://broad bandmap.fcc.gov/ There are multiple broadband providers in Collier, including Orlando Telephone Company, Comcast, Century Link, Inc, Viasat, and Hughes Network. MA-65 Hazard Mitigation - 91.210(a)(5), 91.310(a)(3) Describe the jurisdiction's increased natural hazard risks associated with climate change. According to the County's 2020 Multi -Jurisdictional Local Mitigation Strategy, Collier County is threatened by several different types of natural, technological, and manmade hazards. These hazards endanger the health and safety of the people of the county, jeopardize its economic vitality, and imperil the quality of the natural environment. All lands bordering the Gulf Coast are susceptible to tidal effects and flooding. Due to the relative flatness of Collier County's topography, historical water flow has always been shallow overland sheet flow during the wet season. Hurricanes and tropical storms can occur anywhere within the Collier County planning area. While coastal areas are most vulnerable to hurricanes, their wind and rain impacts can be felt hundreds of miles inland. All of Collier County is vulnerable to hurricane and tropical storm surge, but to varying degrees, with areas closer to the coast and water bodies that drain into the coast facing greater risk. Describe the vulnerability to these risks of housing occupied by low- and moderate -income households based on an analysis of data, findings, and methods. Over 95% of Collier County falls within the Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA). By definition of the 100-year flood event, SFHAs are defined as those areas that will be inundated by the flood event having a 1-percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year. Low-income properties located in these areas have a 26% chance of flooding over the life of a 30-year mortgage. According to NCEI, 35 recorded flood events affected the Collier County area from 2000 to 2019 causing an estimated $6,534,500 in property damage, with no fatalities, injuries, or crop damage. Debris also poses a risk both during and after a flood to all residents including low-income households. During a flood, debris carried by floodwaters can cause physical injury from impact. The second type of health problem arises after most of the water has gone. Stagnant pools can become breeding grounds for mosquitoes, and wet areas of a building that have not been properly cleaned breed Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 115 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) mold and mildew. A building that is not thoroughly cleaned becomes a health hazard, especially for small children and the elderly. Much of the housing that is affordable to lower income households is naturally occurring — meaning older and less desirable housing. Many of these older units, built to less stringent standards, may be at increased risk to natural hazards. The County has identified housing -related vulnerabilities of low- and moderate -income residents: • Most residents lack the savings and/or insurance required to weather significant economic challenges. • Economic shocks due to natural hazards, unexpected health expenses, or national economic conditions can very quickly translate into housing instability and foreclosure. • There is currently very little, if any, excess housing stock in the Collier County area. Lower income households are also more likely to lack rental insurance to recover from a disaster and will have greater difficulty affording the cost of installing and operating cooling systems if temperatures continue to rise. Strategic Plan SP-05 Overview Strategic Plan Overview The Strategic Plan provided below identifies priority needs and geographic focus areas for community development and housing efforts in the Collier County for the next five years. This Plan will identify the County's anti -poverty initiatives, market conditions, available resources, and the plan to monitor performance and compliance for each HUD program for which it receives funds. The priorities identified are based on the information received from needs assessment surveys, market analysis, stakeholder meetings, and public comments. Collier County is anticipating over $18 million in federal funds over this 5-year Consolidated Plan period. Collier County Community & Human Service Division will administer these grant funds. The Community and Human Services Division will partner with county departments, nonprofit partners, developers, community housing development organizations, and the local housing authority to expend these funds on eligible activities that address the strategic priorities listed in this Plan. CDBG, HOME, and ESG allocations will be leveraged to generate long term improvements for low and moderate -income residents and communities while helping to address various federal, state, and local priorities, such as affordable housing, fair housing choice, economic development, homelessness, and lead -based paint hazards. The county will concentrate CDBG, HOME, and ESG spending on community facilities, infrastructure projects, and public service activities. HOME funds will be utilized on the development or rehabilitation of single and multi -family housing units, tenant -based rental assistance activities, and homebuyer activities. Additionally, the County will focus on rapid re - Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 116 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) housing, homelessness prevention, emergency shelter, and essential services for the homeless with the ESG grant. The County currently has 97 Census Block groups that are classified as low/moderate income. These tracts were defined by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) as low/moderate-income and are shown on the map below and table below. FY 2020 ACS 5-Year 2011-2015 Low- and Moderate -Income Summary Data Tract Blckgrp Low Lowmod Lmmi Lowmoduniv Lowmod_pct 010510 2 385 480 645 940 51.06% 010412 3 100 1065 1470 2065 51.57% 010506 1 555 670 955 1290 51.94% 010105 1 85 550 815 1045 52.63% 010505 2 635 1445 1905 2730 52.93% 010601 1 445 500 580 940 53.19% 010108 2 145 415 505 775 53.55% 010300 2 180 615 865 1135 54.19 010701 4 295 510 880 925 55.14% 010419 2 675 985 1395 1730 56.94% 010411 3 1185 1770 2240 3030 58.42% 010605 1 160 555 810 950 58.42% 010506 3 1540 1690 2150 2880 58.68% 010507 1 1650 2055 2655 3475 59.14% 011301 3 505 870 1100 1455 59.79% 010110 4 360 860 975 1435 59.93% 010411 1 1425 2150 2720 3535 60.82% 010803 1 480 1055 1300 1730 60.98% 011102 3 510 640 785 1045 61.24% 010701 2 350 500 670 815 61.35% 010701 1 545 980 1380 1585 61.83% Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 117 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) 011400 1 780 1070 1440 1730 61.85% 010417 3 155 630 715 1015 62.07% 010509 2 350 690 900 1105 62.44% 010211 1 230 535 700 840 63.69% 011105 2 630 735 800 1130 65.04% 011302 3 1475 2045 2915 3115 65.65% 011400 3 1090 1115 1460 1675 66.57% 010803 3 530 965 1175 1430 67.48% 010110 3 370 865 940 1260 68.65% 010419 1 875 1520 1820 2205 68.93% 010702 1 780 1120 1385 1620 69.14% 010420 2 1255 2270 2695 3260 69.63% 011301 2 2045 2990 3665 4180 71.53% 010508 1 1125 2415 2760 3375 71.56% 010701 3 175 330 370 450 73.33% 011204 1 575 855 1150 1150 74.35% 010410 2 815 1390 1775 1835 75.75% 011102 2 835 860 940 1135 75.77% 010604 3 290 975 1205 1260 77.38% 010605 3 570 960 1035 1240 77.42% 010601 2 935 1140 1370 1470 77.55% 010410 1 1995 3195 3805 4075 78.40% 000700 1 865 1125 1280 1425 78.95% 010420 3 755 1270 1310 1600 79.38% 011103 2 880 1135 1325 1395 81.36% 011205 1 715 965 1080 1165 82.83% 010410 3 2135 3550 3860 4180 84.93% Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 118 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) 010420 1 1050 1725 1900 2015 85.61% 011302 1 890 1690 1830 1955 86.45% 010802 4 870 1075 1225 1225 87.76% 010802 3 1170 1940 2120 2145 90.44% 011400 2 580 1085 1140 1195 90.79% 011204 2 1795 1900 2045 2045 92.91% 011302 2 1275 1650 1765 1765 93.48% 011205 2 1185 1275 1290 1340 95.15% 011204 3 715 775 775 810 95.68% 011301 1 590 850 850 880 96.59% SP-10 Geographic Priorities — 91.215 (a)(1) Geographic Area Collier County is an urban area that relies on widely accepted data such as American Community Survey (ACS), HUD low and moderate -income summary data, and Federal Financial Institutions Examinations Council (FFIEC) data to determine areas throughout the community with concentrations of low and moderate -income communities. Program resources are allocated county -wide based on low -mod areas, which often coincide with areas of minority concentration. Over the next five years, the County intends to utilize CDBG, HOME, and ESG funds in areas where Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 119 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) 51% or more of residents have low or moderate household incomes) are shown in the map below: Low- and Moderate -income Data, based on 2011-2015 AC5 5-year Estimates ff ivnd Run: }� Wvridc,4 _ M'rtn g n r ! - - SOurh rf011C0 Are+ lvn8'- - uono Rnertr� -Co�k3arew':-."., l4•o,rr ldnnogemrnl-_ 9._ "_ ^"�^` " -- ,Marsh Gore Brares r-. WR'Iqr �❑S � � arlrrgr - - 175 ��'��___ _- -- L e Pi—yune kes1n33N _ Strand Fekahnuhre _- - ss— _ -_ lrAtrr�[+ Scare Forest Strand = - - __ - _ _ = p _ Prcsrrve - - - -- Srare parks ----- _-- - - - -- Big cypress- M National • _ _ - -- _ _ 7rn mc6evn - -- - - - - =t = Preserve 31512021. 3:59:59 PM LMISD 6y Place & Consolidated City LMISD by County 1:577,791 ❑ 45 9 18 mi ❑ 5 10 20 km VO—S—M. fa 5cwnih_.CCW SA U.S. DeparmertcrXw M--Oneicprpe W App Er Mm dam QC—S—M. mnirbumrs. CC 61 SA Collier County and the City of Naples participate together in the Urban County CDBG Program. Marco Island, an incorporated city within the County, opted out of participation in 2012. Target Area Description Target Area Name: Countywide Target Area Type: Countywide Table 45 - Geographic Priority Areas General Allocation Priorities Describe the basis for allocating investments geographically within the jurisdiction (or within the EMSA for HOPWA) Collier County receives a direct entitlement of CDBG, HOME, and ESG funds from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development to address the needs in the community. The needs identified during the Needs Assessment process were not exclusive to any specific geographic area within the County. Collier County has opted to undertake projects that will benefit income -eligible households throughout the County rather than identifying a target area. Program Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 120 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) resources are allocated countywide based on low -mod areas, which often coincide with areas of minority concentration. The following map depict the low- and moderate -income block groups within Collier County. The low-income block groups identified in the map below will generally be prioritized for allocation of Consolidated Plan resources, however, individual low- and moderate -income persons residing anywhere in Collier County may be eligible beneficiaries of CDBG funds. Map Lov Source: HUD CPD Mapping Tool, https://egis.hud.gov/cpdmaps/ Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 121 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) SP-25 Priority Needs - 91.215(a)(2) Priority Needs Through the Consolidated Planning process, the County has evaluated needs and assessed the market to determine gaps in services and needs in the community. Through the evaluation and findings of other studies focused on community development along with the needs and concerns established throughout the public participation process, a set of seven (7) priority needs have been identified to guide the use of community development funds throughout the next five years. Priority Need Name Housing Affordability Priority Level High Extremely Low Income Population Low -Income Moderate Income 1 Geographic Areas Affected Countywide —Collier County, FL - New Construction, Rehabilitation, or Acquisition of Housing for Homeownership - New Construction, Rehabilitation, or Acquisition of Housing for Homeownership Rental Housing Associated Goals - Homebuyer Assistance - CHDO Set -Aside - Tenant Based Rental Assistance Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 122 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - Provide down -payment assistance (principal reduction and closing cost reduction) to eligible low- and moderate -income homebuyers. - Provide rental subsidies (TBRA) to low-income households to make existing units affordable for elderly, frail elderly, disabled persons, and veterans. Description - Support the development of affordable rental and owned housing, including projects located near job centers that will be affordable to service employees and other low -wage members of the workforce. - Support homeownership opportunities for households through down payment or closing cost assistance. The need for affordable housing for target populations was shown to be in great need in the Basis for Relative Priority Housing Market Analysis, and Community Needs Survey. As demonstrated in the Housing Needs Assessment many families suffer from substandard conditions, overcrowding, and have a severe housing cost burden. Priority Need Name Homelessness & Homelessness Prevention Priority Level High 2 Extremely Low -Income Low -Income Population Moderate -Income Disabled (Physical, Mental, Behavioral Health) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 123 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Elderly and Frail Elderly Children and Youth Homeless and At -Risk Populations Geographic Areas Affected Countywide —Collier County, FL - Support Emergency Housing and Services for the Homeless Associated Goals - HMIS Support - Provide Rapid Re -Housing and Homelessness Prevention - Assist persons who are homeless through emergency, transitional, and permanent housing, and supportive services. - Assist households at risk of homelessness with short-term rental payment and other Description assistance. - Assist agencies in tracking homelessness services through a homeless management information system. As demonstrated in the Homeless Needs Assessment section of this plan and the Community Needs Survey, the homeless population in the Collier County continues to grow without the Basis for Relative Priority increase of services to meet their needs. Interviews with community stakeholders, public meeting comments, and survey data reveled through our strategic planning process that this is a high priority, Priority Need Name Public Facilities 3 Priority Level High Population Extremely Low -Income Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 124 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Low -Income Moderate -Income Disabled (Physical, Mental, Behavioral Health) Elderly and Frail Elderly Children and Youth Homeless and At -Risk Populations Geographic Areas Affected Countywide — Collier County, FL - Improve Public Facilities Associated Goals - Improve Other Facilities - Support public facility improvements that benefit low/moderate income households and persons, and persons with special needs to include community centers, health care facilities, Description parks, and public safety stations/offices, as well as other allowable public facility projects. - Improve existing deteriorated public facilities and infrastructure in low- and moderate - income areas. The need for facilities is shown through the continued expressed need from the Community Basis for Relative Priority Needs Survey. Priority Need Name Public Infrastructure Improvements 4 Priority Level High Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 12S OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Extremely Low -Income Low -Income Moderate -Income Population Disabled (Physical, Mental, Behavioral Health) Elderly and Frail Elderly Children and Youth Homeless and At -Risk Populations Geographic Areas Affected Countywide —Collier County, FL Associated Goals - Public Infrastructure Improvements - Support public infrastructure improvements that benefit low/moderate income households that eliminate blight, improve safety, and provide new affordable housing to include demolition and redevelopment, sidewalk construction and repair, street improvements, Description streetscaping, street lighting, crosswalks and pedestrian signaling systems, stormwater improvements, and other allowable infrastructure improvements not listed here. - Improve existing deteriorated infrastructure in low- and moderate -income areas. The need for infrastructure is shown through the continued demand for assistance from the Basis for Relative Priority various programs and the expressed need from the Community Need Survey, interviews with key community stakeholders, consultation with County staff, survey data, prior studies conducted by the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization. Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 126 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Priority Need Name Public Services Priority Level High Extremely Low -Income Low -Income Moderate -Income Population Disabled (Physical, Mental, Behavioral Health) Elderly and Frail Elderly Children and Youth 5 Homeless and At -Risk Populations Geographic Areas Affected Countywide —Collier County, FL Associated Goals - Provide Public Service Fund projects that provide supportive services to low- and moderate -income households as well as persons with special needs, specifically including but not limited to medical and dental Description services, mental health and substance abuse services, services to persons with disabilities, senior services, youth services, housing counseling, legal services, services for victims of domestic violence, employment training, and other allowable public services not listed here. Through the Community Needs Survey and interviews with key community stakeholders, Basis for Relative Priority public meeting input, survey data. Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 127 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Priority Need Name Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Choice Priority Level High Population All 6 Geographic Areas Affected Countywide —Collier County, FL Associated Goals Provide public services Provide assistance and education to homebuyers Description Support targeted fair housing activities such as fair housing education, complaint handling services, and enforcement. Basis for Relative Priority Impediment identified in Al Priority Need Name Program Administration and Planning Priority Level High 7 Population All Geographic Areas Affected Countywide —Collier County, FL Associated Goals - Program Administration Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 128 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Performance of administrative and planning requirements of CDBG, HOME, and ESG Description programs. Basis for Relative Priority Consultation with County staff Table 46 — Priority Needs Summary Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 129 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) SP-30 Influence of Market Conditions — 91.215 (b) Affordable Market Characteristics that will influence Housing Type the use of funds available for housing type Tenant Based TBRA is an important tool for families to maintain affordable housing. Rental Assistance Severe cost burden is the greatest predictor of homelessness risk, with (TBRA) populations paying more than 50% of their income towards housing costs or having incomes at or below 50% AMI at greatest risk of becoming homeless TBRA for Non- Lack of units with supportive services influences this program. Based Homeless Special upon consultations with homeless housing and social service agencies, a Needs need for supportive housing has been identified as a priority. The special needs households include those with disabilities, persons with mental illness, elderly, frail elderly, veterans, as well as dysfunctional households facing a variety of issues. Market characteristics impacting this priority relate to the shortage of privately -owned housing units which are available to provide supportive housing programs. This problem is intensified by the lack of public funds. New Unit Rents will not financially support the cost of new unit production. A Production shortage of affordable, decent housing units is an identified need. The market characteristics influencing this priority include the age and condition of the existing housing stock without the rent levels to support rehabilitation. New construction faces the same market conditions. The HOME program can provide some resources to address this issue. Rehabilitation Rents will not financially support the cost of major rehabilitation projects similar to the new unit production priority discussed above, the achievable rents and income levels in the County often result in rehabilitation in the private marketplace to be financially infeasible. This issue is intensified by the age and condition of the housing stock. Acquisition, Lack of funding available to finance projects. There are opportunities to including improve the conditions and affordability of housing by the acquisition of preservation vacant, deteriorating structures. These structures are for the most part multi -unit in nature or previously nonresidential buildings appropriate for conversion. The cost and complexity of acquisition and rehabilitation of these structures usually requires implementations by an experienced housing development entity and financial assistance. When structures are of historic or architectural value, the cost can be increased. Similar to the new unit production, the HOME program can provide the resources for this type of development. Influence of Market Conditions Table 47 — Influence of Market Conditions Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 130 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) SP-35 Anticipated Resources - 91.215(a)(4), 91.220(c)(1,2) Introduction Collier County Entitlement grant resources totaling $4,567,555.47 are anticipated for the 2021 program yearto meet underserved needs, foster decent affordable housing, develop institutional structure, and enhance coordination between public and private housing and social service agencies. Along with the County's 2021 annual CDBG, HOME, and ESG allocations, this figure includes $134,787.17 in prior year CDBG funds and $666,127.30 in prior year HOME funds that will be reprogrammed for use this year. Additionally, this figure includes an estimated $20,000 in program income, which the County anticipates receiving from its CDBG program for use in 2021. Anticipated Resources • Bond Financing: For multi -family affordable housing and single-family projects. A portion of the bonds issued by a state, local government, or housing development agency may be considered as HOME match. • Collier County Housing Trust Fund: Administered by the County eligible activities include predevelopment, acquisition, construction, and rehabilitation costs associated with low- income housing development. The full amount of Collier Housing Trust Fund grants/loans invested into the project is eligible as HOME match. • Florida Affordable Housing Tax Credit Program: Administered by the State of Florida, this program provides below -market interest rates for low-income housing projects. The maximum interest rate reduction is approximately 4% below market, for a maximum term of 20 years. HOME match is calculated by applying the present discounted cash value to the total yield foregone by the lender. • Affordable Housing Surtax: Passed by the voters in 2018 Property Tax Exemptions: Not for profit developers may receive an exemption from property taxes have been awarded on a project -by -project basis to low-income housing developments. Generally based on the benefits provided to the community and the duration of the low-income housing commitment. • Volunteer Labor: Area non-profit housing developers have been successful in utilizing volunteer labor in their developments. Architects, attorneys, and other professionals have also contributed their services to non-profit housing developments in Collier. Volunteer labor is eligible as HOME match. • Private Contributions: Cash and materials have been contributed to the past by private businesses, lenders, corporations, and foundations to assist in the development of low- income housing in the County. It is expected that future contributions from private sources will continue to provide needed assistance. Private contributions are eligible as HOME match. • Other Federal Resources Used at the Local Level: Federal Low-income Housing Tax Credits are allocated by the State of Florida and are used to subsidize rental housing developments that are affordable to persons with incomes below 60% AMI. Area projects have typically applied for the 9% tax credits in order to serve a lower -income population. Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 131 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) The 9% tax credits are more desirable but statewide demand greatly exceeds available funding. Publicly owned land: The County has a history of utilizing public property for affordable housing. Currently one property is under development for low-income affordable housing in the County. The County does own land itself that could be put toward affordable housing, but is looking at what it has, as well as land owned by other public agencies, to determine whether certain properties are well suited for affordable housing. State Housing Initiatives Partnership program (SHIP): Provides funds to local governments as an incentive to create partnerships that produce and preserve affordable homeownership and multifamily housing. The program was designed to serve very low, low- and moderate -income families. Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 132 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Program Source Uses of Funds Expected Amount Available Year 1 Expected Amount Narrative of Available Remainder Description Annual Program Prior Year Total: Funds of Con Plan Allocation: Income: $ Resources: CDBG Public — Public services $2,774,274 $20,000 $134,787.17 $2,899,061.17 $11,596,244.68 Anticipated Year 1 Federal Infrastructure and funding will include facility entitlement grant improvements funds, program Housing income, and prior - Economic year unallocated Development funds - Administration - Fair Housing HOME Public— - Homebuyer $753,000 $31,571 $666,127.30 $1,450,698.30 $5,802,793.20 Anticipated Year 1 Federal assistance funding will include Acquisition entitlement grant Rental or funds, program homeowner rehab income, and prior Rental or year unallocated homeownership funds new construction Tenant -based rental assistance Administration ESG Public — Shelter Operations $217,796 $0 $0 $217,796 $871,184.00 Anticipated Year 1 Federal Rapid Re -Housing funding will include Homelessness entitlement grant Prevention funds HMIS Administration Table 48 - Anticipated Resources Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 133 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Explain how federal funds will leverage those additional resources (private, state, and local funds), including a description of how matching requirements will be satisfied. Collier County leverages a combination of public and private funding to conduct activities identified in this plan. During this Consolidated Plan period, the County will research opportunities to apply for additional funding streams that are consistent with the goals of the Consolidated Plan. Infrastructure improvements projects capitalize on the ongoing revitalization efforts in the Bayshore Gateway Triangle and the Immokalee CRA. These areas were designated by the Collier County Board of Commissioners to boost the local economy and uplift surrounding communities. Additionally, the County works with several nonprofit organizations by granting funding for facility improvements and services. These grant funds are leveraged by private donations and other resources to provide services to clients or residents of Collier County. The HOME program requires a 25% match of the total amount of funds drawn down during the federal fiscal year. Collier County HOME subrecipients are required to submit a match log that identifies the sources of match funds for each fiscal year. Match funds can be derived from various sources to include: the value of sponsorships from local businesses; waived County fees; donated land or improvements; volunteer hours; donated materials; or by other eligible methods as provided in the HOME regulations. When necessary, the County also uses its SHIP funding to match HOME funds. Historically, match amounts for HOME subrecipients have far exceeded the 25% annual contribution requirements stipulated by HOME program regulations. The ESG program requires a 100% match for the total amount of funds drawn down during the federal fiscal year. Collier County requires all ESG subrecipients to provide a dollar -for -dollar match by calculating the value of volunteer hours, private donations, and salary not covered by ESG, other grant funding, in -kind donations, or by other eligible methods as provided in the ESG regulations. The County also provides match support for the ESG program from general funds. If appropriate, describe publicly owned land or property located within the jurisdiction that may be used to address the needs identified in the plan County owned land will be used in in the development of 82 housing units at the Bembridge property in partnership with McDowell Housing partners. There is no HUD funding in this development. Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 134 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) SP-40 Institutional Delivery Structure — 91.215(k) Explain the institutional structure through which the jurisdiction will carry out its consolidated plan including private industry, nonprofit organizations, and public institutions. Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 135 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Responsible Entity Responsible Role Geographic Entity Type Area Served Collier County Government CDBG, HOME, and ESG Collier County Program Administration Able Academy Nonprofit Public Service Collier County Organization Boys & Girls Club of Collier Nonprofit Public Service Collier County County Organization Children's Advocacy Center Nonprofit Public Service Collier County of Collier County Organization Collier County Housing Housing Homeownership/ Collier County Authority Authority Affordable Housing Collier County Hunger and Nonprofit Homeownership/ Collier County Homeless Coalition Organization Affordable Housing Collier Resource Center, Inc. Nonprofit Public Service Collier County Organization Collier Senior Resources Nonprofit Public Service Collier County Organization David Lawrence Centers for Nonprofit Public Service Collier County Behavioral Health Organization Drug Free Collier Nonprofit Public Service Collier County Organization Empty Bowls Naples, Inc Nonprofit Public Service Collier County Organization Grace Place for Children and Nonprofit Public Service Collier County Families Organization Habitat for Humanity of Nonprofit Homeownership/ Collier County Collier County Organization Affordable Housing Harry Chapin Food Bank Nonprofit Public Service Collier County Organization Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 136 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Hope for Families Ministry Nonprofit Public Service Collier County Organization Immokalee CRA Nonprofit Public Service Collier County Organization Immokalee Fair Housing Nonprofit Homeownership/ Collier County Alliance Organization Affordable Housing Legal Aid Service of Collier Nonprofit Public Service Collier County County Organization Lighthouse of Collier Nonprofit Public Service Collier County Organization Meals of Hope Nonprofit Public Service Collier County Organization NAMI Collier County Nonprofit Public Service Collier County Organization Naples Senior Center at JFCS Nonprofit Public Service Collier County Organization Our Daily Bread Food Pantry Nonprofit Public Service Collier County Incorporated Organization Residential Options of Nonprofit Public Service Collier County Florida (ROOF) Organization St. Matthews House Nonprofit Public Service Collier County Organization St. Vincent de Paul Society, Nonprofit Public Service Collier County Naples Organization STARability Foundation Nonprofit Public Service Collier County Organization The Immokalee Foundation Nonprofit Public Service Collier County Organization The Salvation Army Naples Nonprofit Public Service Collier County Organization The Shelter for Abused Nonprofit Public Service Collier County Women & Children Organization Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 137 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) United Way of Collier and Nonprofit Public Service Collier County the Keys Organization Wounded Warriors of Collier Nonprofit Public Service Collier County Organization Youth Haven, Inc. Nonprofit Public Service Collier County Organization Table 49 - Institutional Delivery Structure Assess of Strengths and Gaps in the Institutional Delivery System Collier County has a comprehensive network of service providers that is made up of nonprofits, private sector developers, community -based development organizations, local housing authorities, and coalitions. Additionally, Collier County has enough staff capacity to dedicate one staff member per grant program that is administers. This allows both the staff and the service providers to become subject matter experts in their grant programs. This expertise maximizes both the efficiency and effectiveness of the programs administration and minimizes mistakes. One of the greatest gaps in the Institutional Delivery System is the financial capacity of the nonprofit partners. The funding Collier County provides is intended to be supplemental to the operation of programs. For many of the nonprofits the County's funding represents the majority of the money expended for a program and limits the reach of the program beyond the amount allocated by HUD. An additional gap has been identified since the release of the revised HOME Final Rule. The final rule eliminated the ability of local housing authorities to serve as Community Housing Development Organizations (CHDOs). While a new CHDO has been identified to take the place of this housing authority some local institutional knowledge has been lost in the transition. Availability of services targeted to homeless persons and persons with HIV and mainstream services. Homelessness Prevention Services Available in the Community Targeted to Homeless Targeted to People with HIV Homelessness Prevention Services Counseling/Advocacy X X X Legal Assistance X X X Mortgage Assistance X Rental Assistance X X Utilities Assistance X X Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 138 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Street Outreach Services Law Enforcement X Mobile Clinics Other Street Outreach Services X Supportive Services Alcohol & Drug Abuse X X X Child Care X X X Education X Employment and Employment Training X Healthcare X X X HIV/AIDS X X X Life Skills X X Mental Health Counseling X X X Transportation X Other Other Table 50 - Homeless Prevention Services Summary Describe how the service delivery system including, but not limited to, the services listed above meet the needs of homeless persons (particularly chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth) Collier County has a comprehensive network of service providers that is made up of nonprofits, private sector developers, community -based development organizations, local housing authorities, and coalitions. Additionally, Collier County has enough staff capacity to dedicate one staff member per grant program that is administers. This allows both the staff and the service providers to become subject matter experts in their grant programs. This expertise maximizes both the efficiency and effectiveness of the programs administration and minimizes mistakes. Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 139 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) One of the greatest gaps in the Institutional Delivery System is the financial capacity of the nonprofit partners. The funding Collier County provides is intended to be supplemental to the operation of programs. For many of the nonprofits the County's funding represents most of the money expended for a program and limits the reach of the program beyond the amount allocated by HUD. An additional gap has been identified since the release of the revised HOME Final Rule. The final rule eliminated the ability of local housing authorities to serve as Community Housing Development Organizations (CHDOs). While a new CHDO has been identified to take the place of this housing authority some local institutional knowledge has been lost in the transition. Describe the strengths and gaps of the service delivery system for special needs population and persons experiencing homelessness, including, but not limited to, the services listed above The County has been successful at partnering with several agencies serving persons with special needs via entitlement funding, and also has provided services and programs to persons with special needs via the SHIP program, which aids in the production and preservation of affordable homeownership and multifamily housing for very low, low, and moderate -income households. Although the County has been successful at working with many of the non-profit organizations in the community, gaps in service delivery include supportive services for homeless individuals, persons with special needs, and supportive housing and transitional housing for residents with substance and alcohol abuse issues. Provide a summary of the strategy for overcoming gaps in the institutional structure and service delivery system for carrying out a strategy to address priority needs. The most significant gap in the service delivery system is identifying sufficient funding to meet the needs identified. Collier County typically receives requests for four to five times the funding available on an annual basis. Consequently, funding is allocated to as many high priorities needs, and projects as is practicable. Given the limited HUD funding available to completely overcome the gaps in the institutional structure, the County collaborates with various partners to ensure that priority needs are addressed. For example, the County operates as the lead agency for the Area Agency on Aging, which provides case management and other services for seniors and oversees a daily nutritional program for seniors in the community. Also, the County seeks and has been successful in receiving many other awards to address priority needs. These grants include a SHIP award to assist with homeowner and rental opportunities and a state of Florida Criminal Justice, Mental Health and Substance Abuse grant through which the County partners with the Sheriff's office and a local mental health facility to improve outcomes for persons in the criminal justice system who have mental health issues. The development of social service collaborations across the region to coordinate the work of social service organizations, disseminate news and information, and spearhead community -wide solutions to local needs is necessary to assist the community in overcoming gaps in services for the homeless and residents with substance abuse issues. Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 140 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) SP-45 Goals Summary — 91.215(a)(4) Goal Descriptions • Provide Assistance and Education to Homebuyers - Funds will be used to assist low-income, first-time homebuyers with down -payment assistance to purchase a home. • Support New Construction, Rehabilitation, or Acquisition of Affordable Housing for Homeownership — Funds will be used to support new construction, rehabilitation, or acquisition of affordable housing for homeownership. • Support New Construction, Rehabilitation, or Acquisition of Affordable Rental Housing — Funds will be used to support new construction, rehabilitation, or acquisition of affordable housing for rental housing. • CHDO Set -Aside — Funds will be used to support new construction, rehabilitation, or acquisition of affordable housing for housing developed by a CHDO. • Tenant Based Rental Assistance — Funds will be used to provide rental subsidies to low-income persons, persons with mental illness, elderly, frail elderly, disabled, and veterans. • Support Emergency Shelter and Services for the Homeless — Funds will be used to provide emergency shelter services and permanent housing for homeless persons. • HMIS Support — Funds will be used to collect client -level data and data on the provision of housing and services to homeless individuals and families and persons at risk of homelessness. • Provide Homelessness Prevention - Funds will be used to provide permanent housing to prevent persons from becoming homeless. Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 141 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Sort Goal Name Start End Category Geographic Priority Funding Goal Outcome Order Year Year Area Needs Indicator Addressed Provide CDBG: $2,773,270 ESG: Other: Planning & 1 Administration 2021 2025 Other Countywide Administration $81,678.50 HOME: Administration: CDBG: & Planning & Planning $392,123.70 5; HOME: 5; ESG: 5 Support New Construction or 2 Rehabilitation 2021 2025 Affordable Countywide Housing CDBG: $2,500,000 Rental Units or Acquisition of Housing Affordability Constructed: 400 Affordable Rental Housing Public facility or Improve Public Non -Housing Public infrastructure 2 2021 2025 Community Countywide Infrastructure CDBG: $918,380 activities other than Infrastructure Development Improvement low/moderate-income housing benefit: 5,625 Public facility or Improve Public Non- Housing Public infrastructure 3 and Other 2021 2025 Community Countywide CDBG: $672,751.32 activities other than Facilities Development Facilities low/moderate-income housing benefit: 900 Support New Rental Units Construction, Rehabilitated Assisted: Rehabilitation, Affordable Housing CDBG: $5,395,000.00 260 4 or Acquisition of 2021 2025 Housing Countywide Affordability HOME: $2,000,000.00 Affordable Rental Units Acquired: Rental Housing 5 5 Provide Public 2021 2025 -Community Countywide Public Services CDBG: $1,741,755.85 Number of persons Services Development assisted: 1100 Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 142 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Support New Construction, Rehabilitation, 6 or Acquisition of 2021 2025 Affordable Countywide Housing HOME: $1,245,058.60 Other: Rental Units Housing Affordability Acquired: 5 Affordable Housing for Homeownership 7 CHDO 2022 2025 Affordable Countywide Housing CH DO Set -aside: Rental Units Housing Affordability $451,800 Constructed:20 Support Emergency Homelessness 8 Housing and 2021 2025 Homeless Countywide & ESG: $500,000.00 Homeless Person Services for the Homelessness Overnight Shelter: 600 Homeless Prevention Homelessness 9 HMIS Support 2021 2025 Other Countywide ESG: $200,000.00 Other: HMIS Support Homelessness Prevention Homeless Homelessness Homelessness 10 Prevention & 2021 2025 Homeless Countywide & ESG: $307,306.50 Prevention:25 Rapid Homelessness Rehousing Prevention persons Homelessness Tenant Based Tenant -based Rental 11 Rental 2021 2025 Homeless Countywide HOME: $500,000 Assistance/ Rapid Assistance Homelessness Rehousing: 20 Prevention Table 51— Goals Summary Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 143 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Estimate the number of extremely low-income, low-income, and moderate -income families to whom the jurisdiction will provide affordable housing as defined by HOME 91.315(b)(2) Over the next five years, Collier County anticipates providing affordable housing for an estimated 25 extremely low-income, low- income, or moderate -income families through CHDO activities, and support for new construction, rehabilitation, or acquisition of affordable rental or for -sale housing using HOME funds. Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 144 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) SP-50 Public Housing Accessibility and Involvement — 91.215(c) Need to Increase the Number of Accessible Units (if Required by a Section 504 Voluntary Compliance Agreement) The Collier County Housing Authority (CCHA) is an independent authority established under state law, is separate from the general control of the County, and operates no HUD -funded public housing units. The Collier County Housing Authority is not required by a Section 504 Voluntary Compliance Agreement to increase the number of accessible units. Activities to Increase Resident Involvements The Collier County Housing Authority undertakes a variety of initiatives to increase resident involvement which include established programs that represent all residents living in Housing Authority developments. The Collier County Housing Authority coordinates programs, activities, and services offered to residents, including: ■ Family Self Sufficiency Program - designed to assist residents with achieving self- sufficiency. This effort is accomplished through goal setting, intervention, advocacy, and community collaboration. When entering the program, the residents meet with a Family Self Sufficiency (FSS) Program Coordinator to discuss their needs and to set goals. Residents can receive assistance with seeking employment, job training, and educational opportunities. Is the public housing agency designated as troubled under 24 CFR part 902? The Collier County Housing Authority is not designated as troubled and is considered a high performer. Plan to remove the 'troubled' designation Not applicable SP-55 Barriers to affordable housing — 91.215(h) Barriers to Affordable Housing The inventory of affordable housing in Collier County is not sufficient to meet the demand for affordable units. One of the primary challenges to creating and preserving affordable housing in Collier County is that household income is failing to keep up with rising housing costs. The local economy is focused on retail, hospitality, services, and agriculture; however, high housing costs have priced out much of the workforce needed for the county to function. Strategy to Remove or Ameliorate the Barriers to Affordable Housing Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 145 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Collier County faces a burgeoning issue in trying to identify, quantify and qualify new and existing affordable housing units. With a wider range of housing options, Collier County would be better equipped to tackle the affordable housing problem. The effort requires comprehensive strategies and a variety of tools that can be used alone or in combination to reduce costs and increase availability. During this consolidated plan period, Collier County will continue to Review and Revise the Land Development Code which, if done well will make it easier to implement necessary changes to encourage housing affordability. The current Land Development Code (LDC) does not consistently support and encourage growth in already existing urbanized areas of the county (those areas generally west of Collier Parkway). Many of the LDC's ordinances are geared toward large-scale, planned -unit developments (PUDs) on greenfield sites. Conversely, smaller -scale redevelopment and infill sites in already developed areas of the county are challenging to consolidate, may need to address adjacent uses and neighborhood concerns, and often require additional density to make them financially feasible. Collier County can also consider reducing parking standards to achieve affordability, permitting guest houses as accessory dwelling rental unit, encouraging smart -site infrastructure, and identify strategic opportunity sites. SP-60 Homelessness Strategy — 91.215(d) Reaching out to homeless persons (especially unsheltered persons) and assessing their individual needs Collier County, through its nonprofit partners, provides services for the homeless by allocating ESG funding. The network of services providers refers clients to one another for assistance on an ad hoc basis. They work to build trusting relationships with homeless persons living on the streets and in shelters as well as at -risk populations to remain stably housed. The subrecipients perform assessments for homeless persons and those at risk of homelessness to link them to shelter and other supportive services that are appropriate to meet their needs. All subrecipients funded through the County's ESG will participate in coordinated entry. Additionally, the County also continues to provide funding for salaries and operating costs to shelters in the community including the Shelter for Abused Women and Children. The County also supports facility improvements at local emergency shelter locations. Collier County also participates in the Point in Time Count to identify the number of homeless persons in the County and to appropriately allocate funding to address homelessness and human trafficking victims. Addressing the emergency and transitional housing needs of homeless persons Collier County currently awards its ESG entitlement funds to subrecipients for the operation of emergency shelters, provision of hotel/motel vouchers, financial assistance through rapid re- housing to become stably housed and homeless prevention programs to serve individuals and families. Some emergency shelters and homeless prevention programs are designed to focus their services to the needs of specific populations such as families, victims of domestic violence, persons being evicted, and persons with severe mental health disorders or substance abuse histories. Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 146 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) In response to the HEARTH Act and 24 CFR part 576, Collier County, in collaboration with its subrecipients are working together to prevent homelessness by helping families remain within their communities and retain their current permanent housing or diverting people to permanent housing solutions. The first step in this process was to streamline the intake of homeless families seeking emergency shelter. The improved coordination will result in more families being diverted away from homelessness and more families exiting homelessness and being rapidly re -housed in permanent housing. Helping homeless persons (especially chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth) make the transition to permanent housing and independent living, including shortening the period of time that individuals and families experience homelessness, facilitating access for homeless individuals and families to affordable housing units, and preventing individuals and families who were recently homeless from becoming homeless again. The County will continue to administer the Emergency Solutions Grants (ESG) and oversee activities for homeless individuals and families. The County has identified rapid re -housing as a priority during the next Consolidated Plan period. Obtaining permanent housing for homeless individuals and families will shorten the length of time spent in emergency and transitional shelters. Collier County encourages collaboration with organizations to transition as many people as possible into permanent housing as quickly as possible. The County also supports the implementation of coordinated entry process to assess and direct the homeless and people with mental illness to appropriate housing and services. Some families or individuals may require only limited assistance for a short period of time, such as emergency food and shelter -- until a first paycheck is received or a medical emergency has passed. Others will require more comprehensive and long-term assistance, such as transitional housing with supportive services and job training. Due to limited resources, it is important for agencies to eliminate duplication of effort by local agencies, both in assessment procedures and in subsequent housing and supportive services. The Homeless Management Information System (HMIS) can be improved with common intake forms, shared data, effective assessment instruments and procedures, and on -going coordination of assistance among community organizations. Help low-income individuals and families avoid becoming homeless, especially extremely low- income individuals and families who are likelyto become homeless after being discharged from a publicly funded institution or system of care, or who are receiving assistance from public and private agencies that address housing, health, social services, employment, education, or youth needs Diversion to housing and services outside of the traditional homeless services system is an integral part of helping families to avoid becoming homeless. Through a coordinated system, service providers will work with families to identify other housing options available for the household rather than accessing shelter through the homeless system. For example, family or friends that the client may be able to stay with while stabilizing their housing situation, which Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 147 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) may be more beneficial for the household and simultaneously reserves homeless shelter resources for those with no other options. SP-65 Lead based paint Hazards — 91.215(i)y Actions to address LBP hazards and increase access to housing without LBP hazards Collier County will continue to implement countermeasures to reduce lead -based paint hazards by abating or removing lead -based paint hazards found in existing housing built prior to 1978. Collier County educates the public on the hazards of lead -based paint and educates parents about protecting their children. In response to lead -based paint hazards and the limited resources available, the County will plan a steady, long-term response in accordance with Federal lead - based paint standards, other applicable federal regulations, and local property standards. The County will identify houses with lead -based paint through the various housing programs undertaken by the County and will abate or remove lead hazards in high priority units. Government assisted housing rehabilitation projects will include the completion of a lead -based paint inspection according to HUD and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) guidelines. Policies and procedures for abatement of lead hazards have been established in Collier County, which include determining cost effectiveness for abatement and procedures for assessing, contracting, and inspecting post -abatement work. The policies and procedures also include preparing work write-ups and costs estimates for all income eligible persons in Collier County with identified lead -based paint hazards. How are the actions listed above related to the extent of lead poisoning and hazards? Lead poisoning is the leading environmental hazard to children, creating devastating and irreversible health problems. The leading cause of lead -based poisoning is exposure to dust from deteriorating paint in homes constructed before 1978. This is due to the high lead content used in paint during that period, and particularly in homes built before 1950. Pre-1978 housing occupied by lower income households with children offers particularly high risks of lead exposure due to the generally lower levels of home maintenance among lower income households. This is an important factor since it is not the lead paint itself that causes the hazards, but rather the deterioration of the paint that releases lead -contaminated dust and allows children to peel and eat lead -contaminated flakes. How are the actions listed above integrated into housing policies and procedures? Collier County policies and procedures call for full compliance with the lead -based paint regulations at 24 CFR Part 35. Contractors, subrecipients, and other community partners are advised of the lead -based paint regulations and the County works with them to ensure inspection, testing, and abatement of lead hazards wherever necessary. Additionally, the County distributes information and literature on lead hazards to households who may be at risk of exposure. Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 148 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) SP-70 Anti -Poverty Strategy — 91.215(j) Jurisdiction Goals, Programs and Policies for reducing the number of Poverty -Level Families Collier County has a Business and Economic Division that provides help with business relocation and expansion. This Division has partnered with several local economic development agencies, including the Small Business Development Center, which helps with small business start-ups, Career Source of Southwest Florida to help with job training and employment services, and Naples Chamber of Commerce. The local community college provides additional classes and training related to small business development and implementation and job training programs. Life skills, employment, and job training activities are offered in areas with high concentrations of low-income residents including Immokalee, and there are two targeted CRAB in the Bayshore- Gateway Triangle Area and Immokalee. How are the Jurisdiction poverty reducing goals, programs, and policies coordinated with this affordable housing plan Some of the jurisdiction's poverty reduction programs and the affordable housing programs detailed in this plan are managed by Collier County, allowing for strong coordination of program offerings, performance goals, and policies. SP-80 Monitoring — 91.230 Describe the standards and procedures that the jurisdiction will use to monitor activities carried out in furtherance of the plan and will use to ensure long-term compliance with requirements of the programs involved, including minority business outreach and the comprehensive planning requirements Subrecipients will receive information on federal and local regulations relating to their specific activity, along with an explanation as to how they apply to the project. Specific performance objectives will be outlined within each subrecipient agreement, giving measurable objectives for the eligible activity to be carried out. Each project is monitored on an ongoing basis and all preconstruction conferences are attended by division staff. Prior to any contracting, CHS staff reviews program requirements with prospective subrecipients, including emphasis on conflict of interest and special requirements for each subrecipient's specific agreement. This process ensures subrecipients are fully aware of program requirements. Documentation submitted with reimbursement requests is reviewed for compliance with applicable regulations and measurable objectives prior to issuing funds. On -site monitoring of selected subrecipients is scheduled by the County and conducted by the CHS Grant Monitoring Team using an enhanced monitoring checklist. The Monitoring Team is typically composed of the Compliance Supervisor, the Project Grant Coordinator, the Monitoring Operations Analyst, and a Senior Accountant. This team is charged with providing a progress monitoring visit and evaluation and a second visit at final project closeout (the timing of which Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 149 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) are subject to change based on current divisional policies). The specific number of monitoring visits each funded entity receives is based on a risk evaluation, but every project will have a closeout monitoring. Projects still under construction for more than a year are also monitored until the project is complete. Projects are reviewed to ensure all aspects of the activity are carried out in accordance with applicable regulations. After a monitoring visit, CHS sends a follow-up letter to the subrecipient stating the outcome of the monitoring. Where required by the monitoring outcome, Corrective Action Plans are developed and the subrecipient's compliance with the Corrective Action Plan is reviewed until the plan is satisfied. After the Corrective Action Plan is satisfied and all monitoring findings are cleared, CHS closes out the monitoring with a letter to the subrecipient identifying future compliance requirements and reporting responsibilities. In addition to the above, any subrecipient determined to be in need of and/or requesting additional training on how to meet grantee and federal requirements receives technical assistance (TA) in the form deemed most appropriate to the circumstances. The County has developed written policies and procedures that are in place for all federal grant programs. CHS continues to monitor and assist subrecipients to become aware of and knowledgeable about all grant requirements. Additionally, CHS provides TA to achieve compliance with all federal requirements and holds a quarterly partnership meeting with each subrecipient to ensure successful project completion. Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 150 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Expected Resources AP-15 Expected Resources — 91.220(c)(1,2) Introduction Collier County Entitlement grant resources totaling $4,567,555.47 are anticipated for the FY2021 to meet underserved needs, foster decent affordable housing, develop institutional structure, and enhance coordination between public and private housing and social service agencies. Along with the County's 2021 annual CDBG, HOME, and ESG allocations, this figure includes $134,787.17 in prior year CDBG funds and $666,127.30 in prior year HOME funds that will be reprogrammed for use this year. Additionally, this figure includes an estimated $29,000 in CDBG program income and $31,571 in HOME program income. In the prior program year, the County received CDBG-CV and ESG-CV funds to assist eligible individuals and families facing hardships due to the COVID-19 pandemic. CDBG-CV funds were allocated towards economic development activities such as small business loans to assist businesses that have been negatively affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. CDBG-CV funds were also allocated to the purchase of medical equipment such as personal protective equipment and testing. ESG-CV funds were utilized for expanded rapid re -housing and homeless prevention activities. The County continues to assess the effectiveness of these allocated funds and will work to ensure that the funds are utilized to optimal efficiency. Additional resources available to Collier County in this program year include State Housing Initiative Partnership (SHIP) funding of approximately $2,500,000 which is used for a wide range of rehabilitation, rental housing, and homeownership assistance. Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 151 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Anticipated Resources Program Source Uses of Funds Expected Amount Available Year 1 Expected Amount Narrative of Available Description Annual Program Prior Year Total: Funds Remainder of Con Allocation: Income: $ Resources: Plan CDBG Public — - Public services $2,744,274 $29,000 $134,787.17 $2,908,061.17 $11,093,096 Anticipated Year 1 Federal - Infrastructure and funding will include facility entitlement grant improvements funds, program - Housing income, and prior - Economic year unallocated Development funds - Administration - Fair Housing HOME Public — - Homebuyer $753,000 $31,571 $666,127.30 $1,450,698.30 $3,138,284 Anticipated Year 1 Federal assistance funding will include - Rental or entitlement grant homeowner rehab funds, program - Rental or income, and prior homeownership year unallocated new construction funds - Acquisition - Tenant -based rental assistance - Administration ESG Public — - Shelter Operations $217,796 $0 $0 $217,796.00 $871,184.00 Anticipated Year 1 Federal - Rapid Re -Housing funding will include - Homelessness entitlement grant Prevention funds - HMIS - Administration Table 52 - Expected Resources — Priority Table Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 152 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Explain how federal funds will leverage those additional resources (private, state, and local funds), including a description of how matching requirements will be satisfied. Projects selected for funding by Collier County leverage additional community resources, including public and private agency funds. Although the CDBG program does not require a match from non-federal sources, monies dedicated to infrastructure improvements capitalize on ongoing revitalization efforts by the Bayshore and Immokalee Community Redevelopment Agencies (CRAs). Facility improvements for nonprofit organizations enhance their ability to provide services to their clients or residents. Public service funds are granted to agencies with additional public and/or private funding streams that provide a variety of services in addition to those supported by CDBG funds. For example, several nonprofits receive state funds through the Department of Children and Families to support CDBG-funded programs. In recent years, subrecipients also had large private donors who made cash donations. Both the HOME and ESG programs have matching funds requirements. The HOME program match will be provided from organizations that receive HOME funding during FY2021 in in -kind contributions and other non-federal sources to fund the operations supporting the HOME funded program. The County may also satisfy the HOME match through the State Housing Initiative Program (SHIP). The ESG program requires the County provide a 1:1 match. The County plans to fund the Shelter for Abused Women and Children and the subrecipient will provide match through payment of costs associated with shelter operations such as program staff salaries. NAMI's rapid re -housing and the HMIS activity will also provide required match. Additionally, the County pays the salaries of County staff to contribute to match requirements form HUD. Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 153 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) If appropriate, describe publicly owned land or property located within the jurisdiction that may be used to address the needs identified in the plan Florida Statues Section 125.379, Disposition of County property for affordable housing, requires that counties create an inventory of real property with fee simple title appropriate for affordable housing. Collier County maintains the inventory of County -owned surplus land through its Real Property Division. Locally, the disposition of surplus land is governed by Resolution 2007-172 and Resolution 2010-123, which direct the County to sell the land and use the proceeds to increase financial resources set -aside for affordable housing. The County identified two publicly owned parcels suitable for new housing construction and released an RFP for their sale and development in fall 2018. One parcel, known as Bembridge, released an Invitation to Negotiate for the development of affordable housing in spring 2019. The Bembridge property developer will receive Florida Housing Finance Authority funding to construct 82 new rental units in 2021. The project has completed all zoning activities required for construction to begin. The project is expected to commence in late 2021. In 2019, the County acquired 60+ acres in Golden Gate City. As part of this acquisition the County has obligated 40ac to affordable housing. In 2020 the County released an RFP, and a nonprofit developer was selected. This project includes a 10M private donation to support the project. The County will contribute the land to project. In addition, the County Board of Commissioners recently adopted Resolution 2018-39, which encourages the co -location of housing and public facilities when the County acquires future property. Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 154 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) AP-20 Annual Goals and Objectives Goal Descriptions • Support New Construction, Rehabilitation, or Acquisition of Affordable Housing for Homeownership —Funds will be used to support new construction, rehabilitation, or acquisition of affordable housing for homeownership. • Support New Construction, Rehabilitation, or Acquisition of Affordable Rental Housing — Funds will be used to support new construction, rehabilitation, or acquisition of affordable housing for rental housing. • Tenant Based Rental Assistance — Funds will be used to provide rental subsidies to low-income persons, elderly, frail elderly, disabled, and veterans. • Support Emergency Shelter and Services for the Homeless — Funds will be used to provide emergency shelter services and permanent housing for homeless persons. • HMIS Support — Funds will be used to collect client -level data and data on the provision of housing and services to homeless individuals and families and persons at risk of homelessness. • Provide Homelessness Prevention - Funds will be used to provide permanent housing to prevent persons from becoming homeless. Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 155 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Goals Goal Name Start End Category Geographic Needs Funding Goal Outcome Summary Year Year Area Addressed Indicator Information Sort Order CDBG Provide CDBG: $554,654 ESG: Other: Planning & 1 Administration 2021 2022 Other Countywide Administration $16,334.70 HOME: Administration: & Planning &Planning $78,295.30 CDBG: 1; HOME: 1; ESG: 1 Support New Construction, 2 Rehabilitation 2021 2022 Affordable Countywide Housing CDBG: $500,000 Rental Units or Acquisition of Housing Affordability constructed: 80 Affordable Rental Housing Public facility or Non -Housing Public infrastructure 3 Improve Public 2021 2022 Community Countywide Infrastructure CDBG: $183,676 activities other than Infrastructure Development Improvements low/moderate- income housing benefit: 1,125 Public facility or Improve Public Non- Housing infrastructure 4 and Other 2021 2022 Community Countywide Public CDBG: $248,380.00 activities other than Facilities low/moderate- Facilities Development income housing benefit: 180 Support New Rental Units Construction, Rehabilitated: 52 Rehabilitation, Affordable Housing CDBG: $1,079,000.00 5 or Acquisition of 2021 2022 Housing Countywide Affordability HOME: $400,000.00 Affordable Rental Units Rental Housing Acquired: 1 Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 156 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Public service activities for other 6 Provide Public 2021 2022 Community Countywide Public Services CDBG: $348,351.17 than Low/Moderate Services Development Income Housing Benefit: 260 Support New Construction, 7 Rehabilitation, or Acquisition of 2021 2022 Affordable Countywide Housing HOME: $872,403 Homeowner Housing Housing Affordability Added: 8 Affordable Housing for Homeownership Support Emergency Homelessness Homeless Person 8 Shelter and 2021 2022 Homeless Countywide & ESG: $100,000.00 Overnight Shelter: Services for the Homelessness 120 Homeless Prevention Homelessness 9 HMIS Support 2021 2022 Other Countywide & ESG: $40,000 Other: HMIS support Homelessness 3 Prevention Provide Homelessness 10 Homelessness 2021 2022 Homeless Countywide & ESG: $61,461.30 Homelessness Special Needs Homelessness prevention: TBD Prevention Prevention Homelessness Tenant -based Rental Tenant Based Affordable & Assistance/ Rapid 11 Rental 2021 2022 Countywide HOME $100,000 Rehousing: Housing Homelessness Assistance Prevention 4 Table 53 — Goals Summary Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 157 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Projects AP-35 Projects — 91.220(d) Introduction For FY 2021-2022, Collier County will fund a total of 12 projects under the CDBG, HOME, and ESG programs, identified below with additional details provided in Section AP-38. Please note that funding levels and goal outcome indicators are estimates for planning purposes. Payments to subrecipients for individual projects and/or activities are not contingent on meeting annual outcome indicators shown below. Subrecipient award amounts may not match those in the applications submitted to the County, as not all projects were funded at requested levels. Recommended activities are eventually finalized in a legal agreement approved by the Board of County Commissioners and the subrecipients. The agreement is considered to contain the final activity description including funding levels, scope elements, deliverables and beneficiaries and supersedes any prior information such as the application or this action plan. CDBG projects include public services, public facility, and public infrastructure improvements. Under the HOME program, the County will fund, acquisition, and/or rehabilitation of affordable housing and a tenant -based rental assistance program. ESG activities include emergency shelter operations support and administration. The administrative costs of the CDBG, HOME, and ESG projects are also included as projects and represent 20%, 10%, and 7.5% of annual allocations, respectively. In the event that any of the activities identified in the project list and descriptions do not perform as anticipated and grant funds are returned, or in the event that additional funds become available, the County reserves the right to reprogram those funds for use in a TBRA, Down Payment and Closing Cost Assistance program for low- and moderate -income households. Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 158 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Projects # I Project Name 1 CDBG Collier County CDBG Administration & Planning 2 CDBG Casa San Juan Diego - National Development 3 CDBG Sunrise Group 4 CDBG Collier County Housing Authority— HVAC Installation 5 CDBG Collier County Housing Authority— Rental Acquisition 6 CDBG Shelter for Abused Women & Children 7 CDBG City of Naples 8 CDBG Sunrise Group 9 CDBG Legal Aid 10 CDBG Project HELP 11 HOME Habitat for Humanity 12 HOME Collier County HOME Administration & Planning 13 HOME Wounded Warrior Project 14 ESG Shelter for Abused Women 15 ESG Collier County ESG Administration & Planning Table 54 — Project Information Describe the reasons for allocation priorities and any obstacles to addressing underserved needs. The County has pursued a variety of strategies to impact the identified needs of the community, the primary obstacle to meeting the underserved needs is the lack of sufficient financial resources. Annually several project proposals may be unfunded or receive only partial funding due to lack of available resources. Allocation priorities for the FY 2021-2022 Action Plan are consistent with those outlined in the Strategic Plan portion of the County's 2021-2025 Consolidated Plan. The priorities were identified through a review of market conditions as well as a needs assessment that analyzed affordable housing, special need housing, homeless, and non -housing community development needs in Collier County. Substantial participation by residents, local and regional organizations, and other stakeholders also informed these priorities. The Consolidated Plan and the Needs Assessment conducted as part of the Consolidated Planning process identified affordable for -sale and rental housing as a top need in Collier County. Housing affordability was the most common issue identified by interviewees and community meeting participants throughout the county, including in Naples and Immokalee. Further, according to Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) data, about 19% of all households in the county spend more than 30% of their income on housing. For low- and moderate -income households, about 75% of renters and 65% of owners spend over 30% of income on housing. Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 159 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) The County made its funding decisions for this Action Plan based on need, geographic priorities, and opportunities to work with subrecipients and other partners that contribute additional resources to leverage federal funds. The main obstacle to addressing underserved needs is the shortage of financial resources to address Collier County's priorities. In the event of natural disasters, pandemics, and other worldwide crisis events (natural or manmade), the County may substantially amend the projects in this Plan to meet the immediate needs of the community. It is the responsibility of the County to plan ahead and be disaster prepared. For example, in the event of hurricanes the County may reprioritize from normal activities to focus on infrastructure and facilities improvements, or increase public services, where allowable, in the case of a pandemic or other natural disaster. Under the State SHIP program, the county has an existing Disaster Assistance Strategy that goes into effect when a disaster declaration has been declared by the President or the Governor. Collier County will also take advantage of federal waivers that may be issued from time to time in the event of declared disasters. In April 2020, the County identified HUD CDBG, ESG and HOME waivers that it was electing to use in addressing the Coronavirus pandemic. Collier County will continue to take advantage of all appropriate CDBG, ESG and HOME waivers as they become available Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 160 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) AP-38 Project Summary Project Summary Information No. Project Goals Supported Geographic Needs Addressed Funding Areas Collier County CDBG Administration & CDBG Planning and Administration Countywide CDBG Planning & CDBG: Planning Administration $548,854.00 Description CDBG Program Administration & Planning Target Date for Completion 9/30/2022 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities (additional 1 information for this discussion may be 1 available on the AP-36 Project Detail screen) Location Description activities (additional information for this County Wide discussion may be available on the AP- 36 Project Detail screen) Planned Activities (additional information for this discussion may be CDBG funds will be used for administrative and planning activities. available on the AP-36 Project Detail screen) Casa San Juan Diego -National Support New Construction, CDBG: Development Rehabilitation, or Acquisition of Countywide Housing Affordability $500,000.00 Affordable Rental Housing 2 Description Subrecipient will utilize CDBG funds to support the development of 80 affordable housing rental units in Immokalee Target Date for Completion 9/30/2022 Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 161 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities 80 low -mod households (additional information for this discussion may be available on the AP- 36 Project Detail screen) Location Description activities (additional information for this County Wide discussion may be available on the AP- 36 Project Detail screen) Planned Activities (additional information for this discussion may be Phase 1: Preliminary engineering, architectural design &permitting. available on the AP-36 Project Detail screen) Sunrise Group Public Facility Improvement Countywide Public Facility Improvement CDBG: $56,369.76 Description Subrecipient will utilize CDBG funds for facility improvements. The County will allocate prior year CDBG funding. Target Date for Completion 9/30/2022 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities 60 individuals with disabilities (additional information for this 3 discussion may be available on the AP- 36 Project Detail screen) Location Description (additional information for this discussion may be Countywide available on the AP-36 Project Detail screen) Planned Activities (additional information for this discussion may be Public Facility Improvements available on the AP-36 Project Detail screen) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 162 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Collier County Housing Authority Affordable Housing: HVAC Installation Countywide Housing Affordability CDBG: $500,000.00 Description Subrecipient will utilize CDBG funds for public facility improvements: HVAC Installation Target Date for Completion 9/30/2022 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities (additional 50 households information for this discussion may be 4 available on the AP-36 Project Detail screen) Location Description (additional information for this discussion may be Countywide available on the AP-36 Project Detail screen) Planned Activities (additional information for this discussion may be Subrecipient will utilize CDBG funds for support affordable housing: HVAC Installation available on the AP-36 Project Detail screen) Collier County Housing Authority Rental Acquisition Countywide Affordable Housing CDBG: $579,000.00 Description Subrecipient will utilize CDBG funds for rental acquisition for low-income households Target Date for Completion 9/30/2022 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the 5 proposed activities (additional 2 households information for this discussion may be available on the AP-36 Project Detail screen) Location Description (additional Countywide information for this discussion may be Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 163 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) available on the AP-36 Project Detail screen) Planned Activities (additional information for this discussion may be Subrecipient will utilize CDBG funds for rental acquisition for low-income households available on the AP-36 Project Detail screen) Shelter for Abused Women & Public Facility Improvement Countywide Public Facility CDBG: Children Improvement $51,223.07 Description Subrecipient will utilize CDBG funds for security enhancement. The County will allocate prior year funding. Target Date for Completion 9/30/2022 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities (additional information for this discussion may be available on the AP-36 Project Detail 120 victims of domestic violence 6 screen) (additional information for this discussion may be available on the AP- 36 Project Detail screen) Location Description (additional information for this discussion may be Countywide available on the AP-36 Project Detail screen) Planned Activities (additional information for this discussion may be Security Enhancement available on the AP-36 Project Detail screen) 7 City of Naples Infrastructure & Improvement Countywide Public Facility CDBG: $183,676.00 Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 164 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Description Subrecipient will utilize CDBG funds for streetlight replacement in Census Tract 0007.00. The County will allocate prior year funding. Target Date for Completion 9/30/2022 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities (additional 1125 low -mod income persons. information for this discussion may be available on the AP-36 Project Detail screen) Location Description (additional information for this discussion may be City of Naples available on the AP-36 Project Detail screen) Planned Activities (additional information for this discussion may be Subrecipient will utilize CDBG funds for streetlight replacement in low-income areas available on the AP-36 Project Detail screen) Sunrise Group Public Services Countywide Public Services CDBG: $98,000.00 Description Subrecipient will utilize CDBG funds for transportation. Target Date for Completion 9/30/2022 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the 60 persons with disabilities proposed activities 8 Location Description (additional information for this discussion may be Countywide available on the AP-36 Project Detail screen) Planned Activities (additional information for this discussion may be Subrecipient will utilize CDBG funds for transportation of disabled persons. available on the AP-36 Project Detail screen) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 165 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Legal Aid Public Services Countywide Public Services CDBG: $158,351.17 Description Subrecipient will utilize CDBG funds for services to victims Target Date for Completion 9/30/2022 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities 100 Victims Served (additional information for this 9 discussion may be available on the AP- 36 Project Detail screen) Location Description (additional information for this Countywide discussion may be available on the AP- 36 Project Detail screen) Planned Activities Subrecipient will utilize CDBG funds for legal services to victims. (additional information for this discussion may be available on the AP- 36 Project Detail screen) Project HELP Public Services Countywide Public Services CDBG: $92,000.00 Description Subrecipient will utilize CDBG funds for a mobile forensic unit. Target Date for Completion 9/30/2022 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the 10 proposed activities 80 Persons Served (additional information for this discussion may be available on the AP- 36 Project Detail screen) Location Description (additional information for this Countywide discussion may be available on the AP- 36 Project Detail screen) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 166 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Planned Activities Subrecipient will utilize CDBG funds for a mobile forensic unit for victims of violence and (additional information for this discussion may be available on the AP- trafficking 36 Project Detail screen) Habitat for Humanity Affordable Housing Countywide Affordable Housing HOME: $306,275.70 Description Subrecipient will utilize HOME funds to acquire scattered sites for new construction. The County will allocate $566,127.30 in 2019 and 2020 prior year funding. Target Date for Completion 9/30/2022 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities 8 units (additional information for this discussion may be available on the AP- 36 Project Detail screen) 11 Location Description (additional information for this Countywide discussion may be available on the AP- 36 Project Detail screen) Planned Activities (additional information for this discussion may be available on the AP- 36 Project Detail screen) Subrecipient will utilize HOME funds to acquire scattered sites for new construction. (additional information for this discussion may be available on the AP- 36 Project Detail screen) Wounded Warriors Affordable Housing Countywide Affordable Housing HOME: $400,000.00 Description Subrecipient will utilize HOME funds to fund veteran housing. 13 Target Date for Completion 9/30/2022 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the 1 household proposed activities Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 167 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) (additional information for this discussion may be available on the AP- 36 Project Detail screen) Location Description (additional information for this Countywide discussion may be available on the AP- 36 Project Detail screen) Planned Activities Subrecipient will utilize HOME funds to acquire rental housing (additional information for this discussion may be available on the AP- 36 Project Detail screen) Collier County HOME Administration HOME Planning and Administration Countywide HOME Planning and HOME: & Planning Administration $46,724.30 Description HOME Planning and Administration Target Date for Completion 9/30/2022 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities 1 (additional information for this 14 discussion may be available on the AP- 36 Project Detail screen) Location Description (additional information for this Countywide discussion may be available on the AP- 36 Project Detail screen) Planned Activities HOME Planning and Administration (additional information for this discussion may be available on the AP- 36 Project Detail screen) 15 Shelter for Abused Women Emergency Shelter Countywide Emergency Shelter ESG: $100,000.00 Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 168 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Description Subrecipient will utilize ESG funds for emergency shelter operations Target Date for Completion 9/30/2022 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities 120 victims of domestic violence (additional information for this discussion may be available on the AP- 36 Project Detail screen) Location Description (additional information for this Countywide discussion may be available on the AP- 36 Project Detail screen) Planned Activities Subrecipient will utilize ESG funds for emergency operations (additional information for this discussion may be available on the AP- 36 Project Detail screen) Collier County ESG Administration & ESG Administration &Planning Countywide ESG Administration & ESG: Planning Planning $16,33S.70 Description ESG Administration & Planning Target Date for Completion 9/30/2022 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities 1 (additional information for this 16 discussion may be available on the AP- 36 Project Detail screen) Location Description (additional information for this Countywide discussion may be available on the AP- 36 Project Detail screen) Planned Activities ESG Administration & Planning Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 169 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) (additional information for this discussion may be available on the AP- 36 Project Detail screen) HMPrevention and HMIS/HomelessIS/Homeless ESG: ESG Uncommitted Rapid Re -housing Countywide Prevention and Rapid Re - $101,460.30 housing Description HMIS/Homeless Prevention and Rapid Re -housing Target Date for Completion 9/30/2022 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities TBD (additional information for this 17 discussion may be available on the AP- 36 Project Detail screen) Location Description (additional information for this Countywide discussion may be available on the AP- 36 Project Detail screen) Planned Activities (additional information for this HMIS/Homeless Prevention and Rapid Re -housing discussion may be available on the AP- 36 Project Detail screen) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 170 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) AP-50 Geographic Distribution — 91.220(f) Description of the geographic areas of the entitlement (including areas of low-income and minority concentration) where assistance will be directed. Collier County is an urban county that relies on widely accepted data such as American Community Survey (ACS), HUD low and moderate -income summary data, and Federal Financial Institutions Examinations Council (FFIEC) data to determine areas throughout the community with concentrations of low and moderate -income communities. Program resources are allocated County -wide based on low -mod areas which often coincide with areas of minority concentration. Over the next year, the County intends to utilize CDBG, HOME, and ESG funds in unincorporated parts of the County and the City of Naples. Marco Island, an incorporated city within the County, opted out of participation in 2012. Over the next program year, the County anticipates spending 96% of its CDBG funds and in Immokalee HVAC improvements to rental housing and infrastructure development and 4% in Naples undertaking, street light replacement, Countywide project include rental acquisitions, shelter security enhancements, transportation services, victim services, acquisition of affordable housing and veteran housing. Geographic Distribution Target Area Percentage of Funds City of Naples 4% Immokalee 18% Collier County- Countywide 78% Table 55 - Geographic Distribution Rationale for the priorities for allocating investments geographically. Collier County targets resources in low -moderate income census block groups to meet regulatory requirements for CDBG grant funds and to target areas with the highest level of needs. Maps provided show Collier County block groups where 51% or more of the population have incomes at or below 80% of the area median income. These areas are considered "target areas" for use of HUD grant funds for area improvements, such as public infrastructure or facility improvements. HUD funds may also be spent outside of these targeted areas, as long as they provide services, improvements, affordable housing, or other benefits for low- and moderate -income households or special needs populations. The following map depict the low- and moderate -income block groups within Collier County. The low-income block groups identified in the map below will generally be prioritized for allocation of Consolidated Plan resources, however, individual low- and moderate -income persons residing anywhere in Collier County may be eligible beneficiaries of CDBG funds. The 2017 Tax Cut and Jobs Act established the Opportunity Zone program. Opportunity zones are low- income census tracts nominated by the Governor of the state to spur private investment for economic Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 171 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) development and job creation in the designated tracts. Collier County has five census tracts that are certified by the State as Opportunity Zones (census tracts 104.11, 108.02, 112.05, 113.01, and 114). HUD encouraged grantees to consider using their CDBG, HOME, and ESG funds for eligible activities in Opportunity Zones in CPD-19-01: Guidance on Submitting Consolidated Plans and Annual Action Plans. The County's Opportunity Zones overlap with census tracts within two of the CDBG target areas. For FY 2020-2021, the County anticipates funding two public facility projects in these census tract target areas. As the Opportunity Zone program regulations are finalized, the County will explore how the CPD funds can be used to leverage Opportunity Zone funding to these areas. Map Legend Low -Mod Block Groups CPD Tool, https:Hegis.hud.gov/cpdmaps/ Affordable Housing AP-55 Affordable Housing — 91.220(g) Introduction Source: HUD Mapping Collier County partners with the Collier County Housing Authority (CCHA) and several non-profit agencies to assist in projects designed to provide affordable rental and homeowner housing, Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 172 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) including assistance to people with disabilities and homeless individuals and families. The special needs population will be served through grants to local service providers. The homeless population will be served through assistance grants to local service providers. To address these needs, the County will use HOME, ESG, and CDBG funds to support the development of new affordable units and the rehabilitation of existing units. One Year Goals for the Number of Households to be Supported Homeless 120 Non -Homeless 25 Special -Needs 3 Total 150 Table 56 - One Year Goals for Affordable Housing by Support Requirement One Year Goals for the Number of Households Supported Through Rental Assistance 0 The Production of New Units 4 Rehab of Existing Units 50 Acquisition of Existing Units 3 Total 57 Table 57 - One Year Goals for Affordable Housing by Support Type Discussion: Rent Reasonableness allows Collier County to provide housing for units up to 10% over the Fair Market Rent rate. AP-60 Public Housing — 91.220(h) Introduction The Collier County Housing Authority (CCHA) is an independent authority established under state law, is separate from the general control of the County, and operates no HUD -funded public housing units. The Collier County Housing Authority is not required by a Section 504 Voluntary Compliance Agreement to increase the number of accessible units. The CCHA owns and manages Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 173 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) public housing developments, including low-income and farm labor housing at Farm Worker Village, farm labor housing at Collier Village, a 192-bed dormitory called Horizon Village, and some scattered site housing. Farm Worker Village is a multi -family low-income and farm labor housing development in Immokalee built under the USDA 514/516 Program. The development includes 176 total acres with 591 housing units, ranging from single-family homes to duplexes and quadraplexes. Farm Worker Village has a main office, convenience store, laundromat, community center, playground, and two daycare centers. Horizon Village offers 192 beds for unaccompanied migrants and seasonal farmworkers in dormitory - style efficiency units, each with space for 8 people, a common kitchen area with appliances, and two bathrooms. A meeting room is available to provide social and educational programs. The Housing Authority also administers approximately 440 Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers. Unlike most public housing authorities, CCHA has no HUD -funded public housing units. Their primary funding is from USDA. Actions planned during the next year to address the needs to public housing. The CCHA has also applied for rehabilitation grant through the Collier County Community and Human Services Division to rehab older units located at Farmworker Village. This project will provide HVAC to 50 units. In 2019-2020, CCHA received a HOME grant to rehabilitate 52 units at Farm Worker village. In addition, CCHA has been awarded funds for the acquisition of rental property to support 2 households during this grant cycle. Actions to encourage public housing residents to become more involved in management and participate in homeownership. The CCHA also sponsors and supports self-sufficiency programs focused at helping their residents improve their economic situation and quality of living. The programs, ROSS and FSS, are voluntary self-sufficiency programs that provide participating families the opportunity to identify needs, improve skill sets, and work towards life goals, economic independence, and housing self- sufficiency programs provide families with: • A plan specifically tailored to their family or individual goals. • A link to community organizations geared towards education, job training and placement programs, computer and financial literacy, and increased self-sufficiency. • An advocate and supporter to help residents work through barriers preventing self- sufficiency. If the PHA is designated as troubled, describe the manner in which financial assistance will be provided or other assistance. The Collier County Housing Authority is not designated as troubled and is considered a high performer. Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 174 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) AP-65 Homeless and Other Special Needs Activities — 91.220(i) Introduction Collier County's 2021-2025 Consolidated Plan identifies increasing housing options for homeless and at risk of homelessness as a strategic priority. Long-term objectives include supporting emergency housing and supportive services, and the implementation of a coordinated entry system. The 2021 ESG allocation will fund emergency shelter and prevention services that are projected to assist homeless and at -risk of homeless beneficiaries. The identified projects target homeless individuals and families who lack the resources to independently regain stable housing. Programs are designed to connect clients with the services necessary to ensure they move from emergency shelter to transitional or permanent housing. Describe the jurisdictions one-year goals and actions for reducing and ending homelessness including Collier County will utilize Emergency Solutions Grants funding for Emergency Shelter, Homelessness Prevention, Rapid Re -Housing, HMIS administration, and ESG program administration. Funding for these programs is projected to benefit homeless persons and those at risk of homelessness. Projects selected for funding are designed to help shorten the period the client experiences homelessness, improve their ability to secure stable housing, and prevent recurrent homeless episodes. Reaching out to homeless persons (especially unsheltered persons) and assessing their individual needs Collier County funds subrecipients that administer homelessness projects under the ESG program. They work to build trusting relationships with homeless persons living on the streets and in shelters as well as at -risk populations to remain stably housed. The subrecipients perform assessments for homeless persons and those at risk of homelessness to link them to shelter and other supportive services that are appropriate to meet their needs. All subrecipients funded through Collier County ESG will participate in coordinated entry. These organizations provide emergency shelter, rental and utility assistance, food and clothing, and other homeless services to individuals, families with children, veterans, unaccompanied youth, and including persons with HIV. Addressing the emergency shelter and transitional housing needs of homeless persons Collier County currently awards its ESG entitlement funds to subrecipients for the operation of emergency shelters, financial assistance through rapid re -housing to become stably housed, and homeless prevention programs to serve individuals and families. Some emergency shelters and homeless prevention programs are designed to focus their services to the needs of specific populations such as families, victims of domestic violence, human trafficking victims, persons Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 175 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) being evicted, and persons with severe mental health disorders or substance abuse histories. In response to the HEARTH Act and 24 CFR part 576, Collier County, in collaboration with its subrecipients are working together to prevent homelessness by helping families remain within their communities and retain their current permanent housing or diverting people to permanent housing solutions. The first step in this process was to streamline the intake of homeless families seeking emergency shelter. The improved coordination will result in more families being diverted away from homelessness and more families exiting homelessness and being rapidly re -housed in permanent housing. Other than the funds available through this process, emergency shelter and transitional housing needs may be addressed through grant funding opportunities, such as the competitive Continuum of Care process, or through other state or local funding streams. Helping homeless persons (especially chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth) make the transition to permanent housing and independent living, including shortening the period of time that individuals and families experience homelessness, facilitating access for homeless individuals and families to affordable housing units, and preventing individuals and families who were recently homeless from becoming homeless again The County will continue to administer the Emergency Solutions Grants Program and oversee activities for homeless individuals and families. The County has identified rapid re -housing as a priority during the next Consolidated Plan period. Obtaining permanent housing for homeless individuals and families will shorten the length of time spent in emergency and transitional shelters. Collier County encourages collaboration with organizations to transition as many people as possible into permanent housing as quickly as possible. Some families or individuals may require only limited assistance for a short period of time, such as emergency food and shelter -- until a first paycheck is received or a medical emergency has passed. Others, however, will require more comprehensive and long-term assistance, such as transitional housing with supportive services and job training. Due to limited resources, it is important for agencies to eliminate duplication of effort by local agencies, both in intake and assessment procedures, and in subsequent housing and supportive services. The Homeless Management Information System (HMIS) can be improved with common intake forms, shared data, effective assessment instruments and procedures, and on -going coordination of assistance among community organizations. Helping low-income individuals and families avoid becoming homeless, especially extremely low-income individuals and families and those who are: being discharged from publicly funded institutions and systems of care (such as health care facilities, mental health facilities, foster care and other youth facilities, and corrections programs and institutions); or, receiving assistance from public or private agencies that address housing, health, social services, employment, education, or youth needs Collier County will continue to operate its rental assistance program in 2021-2022 to assist families and individuals to avoid becoming homeless. This program seeks to prevent Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 176 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) homelessness by providing up to a year of short-term rental assistance (including up to 6 months of rental arrearage), rental security deposits and last month's rent, and/or costs such as rental application fees and utilities. AP-75 Barriers to affordable housing — 91.220(j) Introduction: The inventory of affordable housing in Collier County is not sufficient to meet the demand for affordable units. One of the primary challenges to creating and preserving affordable housing in Collier County is that household income is failing to keep up with rising housing costs. The local economy is focused on retail, hospitality, services, and agriculture; however, high housing costs have priced out much of the workforce needed for the county to function. Actions it planned to remove or ameliorate the negative effects of public policies that serve as barriers to affordable housing such as land use controls, tax policies affecting land, zoning ordinances, building codes, fees and charges, growth limitations, and policies affecting the return on residential investment Collier County faces a burgeoning issue in trying to identify, quantify and qualify new and existing affordable housing units. With a wider range of housing options, Collier County would be better equipped to tackle the affordable housing problem. The effort requires comprehensive strategies and a variety of tools that can be used alone or in combination to reduce costs and increase availability. During this consolidated plan period, Collier County will continue to Review and Revise the Land Development Code which, if done well will make it easier to implement necessary changes to encourage housing affordability. The current Land Development Code (LDC) does not consistently support and encourage growth in already existing urbanized areas of the county (those areas generally west of Collier Parkway). Many of the LDC's ordinances are geared toward large-scale, planned -unit developments (PUDs) on greenfield sites. Conversely, smaller -scale redevelopment and infill sites in already developed areas of the county are challenging to consolidate, may need to address adjacent uses and neighborhood concerns, and often require additional density to make them financially feasible. Collier County can also consider reducing parking standards to achieve affordability, permitting guest houses as accessory dwelling rental unit, encouraging smart -site infrastructure, and identify strategic opportunity sites. AP-85 Other Actions — 91.220(k) Introduction: In addition to the programs and activities described on the prior sections of this plan, the County and its subrecipients intend to undertake a number of other actions to address housing needs and problems in Collier County. These include efforts to reduce the hazards of lead -based paint in housing; efforts to improve the physical condition and management of public housing, promote greater resident involvement in public housing management and create opportunities Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 177 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) for homeownership by public housing residents; and modify or mitigate the impact of any public policies which act as barriers to public housing, improvements to the institutional delivery structure to address any gaps or weaknesses identified in the Consolidated Plan. Actions planned to address obstacles to meeting underserved needs Collier County will collaborate with community leaders, stakeholders, and local non-profit agencies to help remove obstacles to better meet the needs of the underserved population and improve service delivery. The County will coordinate the work of non The County relies on agencies on nonprofit agencies to provide social services, disseminate news and information, and spearhead community -wide solutions to local needs. Collier County will also support the expansion of HMIS technology beyond homeless service providers as a way to link the various categories of services provided by our partner non-profit organizations and standardize performance measures. The County will also review and analyze the work of its various departments and divisions to find opportunities for collaboration between similar programs. Program staff will also ensure that all fair housing education materials are current and compliant with the Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Final Rule. Actions planned to foster and maintain affordable housing. Collier County will actively work to address the need for more decent and affordable housing by continuing to prioritize the investment of funds into all its housing programs. In the interest of preserving affordable housing, the County will continue to support the use of HOME program funds for activities such as: down -payment assistance, land acquisition, TBRA, and single/multifamily acquisitions and rehabilitation. Additionally, the County will continue to utilize CDBG program funds to rehabilitate owner -occupied homes. To promote fair housing choice, the County will encourage and support fair housing rights for all and provide program funds to conduct outreach and education regarding the Fair Housing Law act of 1968. Actions planned to reduce lead -based paint hazards. Collier County will continue to implement countermeasures to reduce lead -based paint hazards by abating or removing lead -based paint hazards found in existing housing built prior to 1978. Individuals who reside in properties built prior to 1978 and receive assistance through CDBG, ESG, or HOME grant programs are required to be inspected for lead -based paint hazards. These inspections are completed by a HUD Certified Inspector in accordance with HUD and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) guidelines. Collier County educates the public on the hazards of lead -based paint and how to protect children and the elderly. In response to lead - based paint hazards and the limited resources available, the County has planned a steady, long- term response in accordance with Federal lead -based paint standards, other applicable federal regulations, and local property standards. Policies and procedures for abatement of lead hazards have been established in Collier County, which include determining cost effectiveness for abatement and procedures for assessing, contracting, and inspecting post -abatement work. The policies and procedures also include preparing work write-ups and costs estimates for all income eligible persons in Collier County with identified lead -based paint hazards. Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 178 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Actions planned to reduce the number of poverty -level families Collier County will continue to increase its efforts to implement anti -poverty strategies for the citizens of Collier. The County will strive to increase its efforts in assisting homeowners and renters with housing rehabilitation and renovation of affordable housing to decrease the financial burden on low -to -moderate -income persons. The County will employ the following strategies to reduce the number of poverty -level families: 1. Support the collaborative efforts of the service providers in Collier County to attract new business and industry to Collier. 2. Support the efforts of the Chamber of Commerce to target certain segments of the economy for business development/job creation. 3. Encourage nonprofit organizations to expand housing development programs to incorporate job -training opportunities as a part of their operations. 4. Promote the use of referral services for the existing Human Service Centers which involves a partnership with many human service agencies, including job referrals. 5. Provide assistance to the County's CHDO to acquire and construct affordable rental housing for low/moderate income persons. 6. Participate in the development of a regional social service collaborative to coordinate the work of social service organizations, disseminate news and information, eliminate duplication of efforts, and spearhead community -wide solutions to local needs. 7. Use enhanced accomplishment data as a criterion in the evaluation of applications for ESG funding. 8. Support any expansion of local transit service and/or for express transit service. Through the initiatives described above, and in cooperation with the agencies and nonprofit organizations noted, the Community and Human Services Department will continue to assist low and moderate -income persons of Collier County over the next five years. Actions planned to develop institutional structure The Community and Human Services Department administers, plans, and manages all facets of the HUD grants for Collier County to ensure that all aspects of the grant programs perform in a concerted manner. The department will work as the housing and community development liaison between the county, local public housing, participating cities, state agencies, and non-profit and community -based organizations. Collier County recognizes the need to maintain a high level of coordination on projects involving other departments and/or non-profit organizations. This collaboration guarantees an efficient use of resources with maximum output in the form of accomplishments. Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 179 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Actions planned to enhance coordination between public and private housing and social service agencies The County will work to foster collaboration through dissemination of services, news, and information across social service organizations, subcontractors, and public and private entities. One way the County will accomplish this is through subrecipient meetings that bring together affordable housing developers and social service agencies. Additionally, the countywide Affordable Housing Plan over the next year will require input from and coordination of both housing providers and social service agencies. The County will encourage community -based solutions and regional partnerships and will continue to support and participate in the CoC, whose membership includes both affordable housing and social service agencies. Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 180 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Program Specific Requirements AP-90 Program Specific Requirements — 91.220(I)(1,2,4) Introduction: Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG) Reference 24 CFR 91.220(I)(1) Projects planned with all CDBG funds expected to be available during the year are identified in the Projects Table. The following identifies program income that is available for use that is included in projects to be carried out. 1. The total amount of program income that will have been received before the start of the next program year and that has not yet been reprogrammed. $29,000 2. The amount of proceeds from section 108 loan guarantees that will be used during the year to address the priority needs and specific objectives identified in the grantee's strategic plan $0 3. The amount of surplus funds from urban renewal settlements $0 4. The amount of any grant funds returned to the line of credit for which the planned use has not been included in a prior statement or plan. $0 5. The amount of income from float -funded activities $0 Total Program Income $0 Other CDBG Requirements Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 181 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) 1. The amount of urgent need activities $0 2. The estimated percentage of CDBG funds that will be used for activities that benefit persons of low and moderate income. Overall Benefit - A consecutive period of one, two or three years may be 80% used to determine that a minimum overall benefit of 70% of CDBG funds is used to benefit persons of low and moderate income. Specify the years covered that include this Annual Action Plan. HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME) Reference 24 CFR 91.220(1)(2) 1. A description of other forms of investment being used beyond those identified in Section 92.205 is as follows: Collier County does not use other forms of investment. 2. A description of the guidelines that will be used for resale or recapture of HOME funds when used for homebuyer activities as required in 92.254, is as follows: The County's Recapture Provisions permit the original homebuyer to sell the property to any willing buyer, at any price the market will bear, during the period of affordability while the County is able to recapture all, or a portion of the HOME -assistance provided to the original homebuyer. Collier County utilizes a recapture policy in compliance of 24 CFR 92.254. The affordability period is determined based upon the amount of HOME Investment Partnerships Program funds invested into an individual project. HOME Regulations set three minimum tiers of affordability periods. When a homeowner chooses to sell or use the property for non -eligible HOME Program activities during the Period of Affordability, the full amount of the HOME Program Direct Subsidy shall be recaptured and repaid to Collier County provided that net proceeds are sufficient. If net proceeds are insufficient to repay the total HOME investment due, only the actual net proceeds will be recaptured. In the event that net proceeds are zero (as is usually the case with foreclosure), the recapture provision still applies. Recaptured funds shall be returned to the Collier County to reinvest in other affordable housing projects for low- to Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 182 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) moderate -income persons. The County's Resale Provisions shall ensure that, when a HOME -assisted homebuyer sells or otherwise transfers his or her property, either voluntarily or involuntarily, during the affordability period: 1) The property is sold to another low-income homebuyer who will use the property as his or her principal residence. 2) The original homebuyer receives a fair return on investment, (i.e., the homebuyer's down payment plus capital improvements made to the house); and 3) The property is sold at a price that is "affordable for a reasonable range of low-income buyers." The County's Recapture and Resale Provisions are included in full in the Appendix. 3. A description of the guidelines for resale or recapture that ensures the affordability of units acquired with HOME funds? See 24 CFR 92.254(a)(4) are as follows: Development Subsidy — a development subsidy is defined as financial assistance provided by the County to offset the difference between the total cost of producing a housing unit and the fair market value of the unit. When provided independently and absent any additional subsidy that could be classified a direct subsidy, development subsidy triggers resale. DirectSubsidy—a direct subsidy is defined as financial assistance provided by the County that reduces the purchase price for a homebuyer below market value or otherwise subsidizes the homebuyer [i.e., down -payment loan, purchase financing, assistance to CHDO to develop and sell unit below market or closing cost assistance]. A direct subsidy triggers recapture. Net Proceeds — the sales price minus superior loan repayment (other than HOME funds) and any closing costs. The County's Recapture and Resale Provisions are included in full in the Appendix. 4. Plans for using HOME funds to refinance existing debt secured by multifamily housing that is rehabilitated with HOME funds along with a description of the refinancing guidelines required that will be used under 24 CFR 92.206(b), are as follows: Not applicable. Collier County has no plans to use HOME funds to refinance existing debt Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 183 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) secured by multifamily housing rehabilitated with HOME funds. Emergency Solutions Grants (ESG) Reference 91.220(1)(4) a) Include written standards for providing ESG assistance (may include as attachment) Collier County's ESG Policy and Procedures Manual is attached as an appendix to this Plan. b) If the Continuum of Care has established centralized or coordinated assessment system that meets HUD requirements, describe that centralized or coordinated assessment system. Coordinated Entry is a streamlined system designed to efficiently match people experiencing homelessness or those at -risk of homelessness to available housing, shelter, and services. It prioritizes those who are most in need of assistance and provides crucial information that helps the Continuum of Care strategically allocate resources. Anyone seeking homelessness or homelessness prevention services in Collier County will complete a coordinated entry assessment which is subsequently evaluated for services. c) Identify the process for making sub -awards and describe how the ESG allocation available to private nonprofit organizations (including community and faith -based organizations). The County provides a competitive process for awarding all entitlement funding. This is widely advertised formally, via email, and at partnership meetings. A review and ranking committee reviews applications for merit and compliance. The CoC is provided an opportunity to support or not support an application. Eventually, the recommended awardees are noted in the Annual Action Plan. All public comment requirements are followed. The Annual Action Plan is presented to the Board of County Commissioners for approval, and then to HUD. The process is as follows: 1. Identification of community development issues, needs, and concerns through community meetings and citizen input. 2. Formulation of community development goals and preliminary strategies, i.e., staff and citizens. 3. Dissemination of Grant Funds information to agencies and individuals 4. Submission of Project applications; and 5. Project Selection: Review of project applications by review committee ii. Present recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners, Public Hearing and Final Selection sent to HUD d) If the jurisdiction is unable to meet the homeless participation requirement in 24 CFR 576.405(a), the jurisdiction must specify its plan for reaching out to and consulting with homeless or formerly homeless individuals in considering policies and funding decisions regarding facilities and services funded under ESG. Collier County meets the homeless participation requirement found in 24 CFR 576.405(a) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 184 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) through the Continuum of Care, which is led by the Collier County Hunger and Homeless Coalition. The CoC comments on funding applications and considers policies regarding homeless facilities and services. Other organizations representing the homeless provided input for the Consolidated Planning process, and a focus group was held at the Shelter for Abused Women and Children to gather input about housing and community development priorities. The County will continue to secure consultation with homeless or formerly homeless individuals, along with local organizations that represent and provide services to the homeless. e) Describe performance standards for evaluating ESG. Performance standards provide a measure for Collier County to evaluate the effectiveness of each ESG service provider in the areas of: (a) Targeting those who need assistance most; (b) Reducing the number of people living on the streets or in emergency shelters; (c) Reducing the time people spend homeless; and (d) Reducing clients' housing barriers or housing stability risks. In addition, the County evaluates the success of ESG programs by reviewing Homeless Management Information System (HMIS) data . Sub recipients are required to submit regular reports which are reviewed by staff. These reports are used to ensure ESG compliance with regulations and local written standards as well as confirming that program goals are being met. ESG programs are also subjected to "on -site monitoring." The County has a Monitoring Group to monitor the ESG programs. This group has participated in over 100 federal grant evaluation designs, evaluation projects, and implementation of evaluation plans. The basis for monitoring is to address findings and provides recommendations for program improvements Collier County will also evaluate each ESG service provider's performance based on the following standards: a) Subrecipients will develop and adhere to priorities for service delivery by need. b) Subrecipients will assist clients in rapid movement to permanent housing from shelters or from the street. c) Subrecipients will ensure that clients have easy access to services. d) Subrecipients will provide comprehensive case management to address a spectrum of needs for each client. Appendix - Alternate/Local Data Sources Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 185 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) 1 Data Source Name 2010-2014 ACS List the name of the organization or individual who originated the data set. U.S. Census Bureau Provide a brief summary of the data set. The American Community Survey is an ongoing statistical survey that samples a small percentage of the U.S. population every year, thus providing communities with more current population and housing data throughout the 10 years between censuses. ACS data is compiled from an annual sample of approximately 3 million addresses rather than an actual count. What was the purpose for developing this data set? This dataset is more current than Census 2010 data and available for more geographic areas than the ACS 1-Year Estimates. How comprehensive is the coverage of this administrative data? Is data collection concentrated in one geographic area or among a certain population? National What time period (provide the year, and optionally month, or month and day) is covered by this data set? 2010-2014 ACS 5-year estimates are based on data collected from January 1, 2010 to December 21, 2014. What is the status of the data set (complete, in progress, or planned)? Complete 2 Data Source Name 2010 Census, 2015 & 2019 American Community Survey List the name of the organization or individual who originated the data set. U.S. Census Bureau Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 186 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Provide a brief summary of the data set. This dataset contains what is known as "100% data," meaning that it contains the data collected from every household that participated in the 2010 Census and is not based on a representative sample of the population. What was the purpose for developing this data set? This data provides basic characteristics such as age, sex, and race for a variety of geographic levels with most data obtainable down to the census tract or block group level. How comprehensive is the coverage of this administrative data? Is data collection concentrated in one geographic area or among a certain population? National What time period (provide the year, and optionally month, or month and day) is covered by this data set? Data was collected in April 2000. What is the status of the data set (complete, in progress, or planned)? Complete 3 Data Source Name 2011-2015 CHAS List the name of the organization or individual who originated the data set. U.S. Census Bureau Provide a brief summary of the data set. To assess housing need, HUD receives a special tabulation of data from the U.S. Census Bureau's American Community Survey that is largely not available through standard Census products. This data, known as the Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) data, counts the number of households that fit certain combinations of HUD - specified criteria, such as housing needs by income level, race, and ethnicity. Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 187 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) What was the purpose for developing this data set? To assess housing need based on HUD -specified criteria such as income level, race, ethnicity, and household type. How comprehensive is the coverage of this administrative data? Is data collection concentrated in one geographic area or among a certain population? National What time period (provide the year, and optionally month, or month and day) is covered by this data set? The 2011-2015 CHAS data is based on American Community Survey data collected from January 1, 2011 to December 21, 2015. What is the status of the data set (complete, in progress, or planned)? Complete 4 Data Source Name 2013 Longitudinal Employer -Household Dynamics List the name of the organization or individual who originated the data set. U.S. Census Bureau Provide a brief summary of the data set. The Longitudinal Employer -Household Dynamics (LEHD) data provides statistics on employment, earnings, and job flows by geography and industry for different demographic groups. What was the purpose for developing this data set? This dataset describes demographic characteristics and commute patterns of workers and jobs to help state and local authorities make informed economic decisions. How comprehensive is the coverage of this administrative data? Is data collection concentrated in one geographic area or among a certain population? National Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 188 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) What time period (provide the year, and optionally month, or month and day) is covered by this data set? 2013 What is the status of the data set (complete, in progress, or planned)? Complete Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 189 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict (PL20220001010) Exhibit V.E Public Facilities Level of Service Analysis Provide the existing Level of Service Standard (LOS) and document the impact the proposed change will have on the following public facilities: The subject 5.88± acre property proposes to create a new subdistrict to allow a maximum of 150 residential dwelling units. The public facilities analysis evaluates the project impacts on Class A public facilities including potable water, wastewater, drainage, parks, schools, roadways, fire/EMS and solid waste. The source for the LOS information is the Collier County 2021 AUIR, unless otherwise noted. Potable Water The property is located within the Collier County Water Sewer District's regional potable water service area. Residential multi -family: 150 dwelling units x 2.5 pph x 130 gpcd = 48,750 gpd Peak: 48,750 gpd x 1.3 = 63,375 gpd Collier County LOS: 130 gpcd There are no existing or anticipated capacity issues; therefore, there are no LOS issues. Data Source: Collier County 2022 AUIR The proposed additional dwelling units will not create any LOS issues related to potable water. Sanitary Sewer The property is located within the Collier County Water Sewer District's North County Water Reclamation Facility's service area. The LOS for wastewater is based on residential population generating 90 gpcd; therefore, the proposed project will not cause any LOS issues. Residential multi -family: 150 dwelling units x 2.5 pph x 90 gpcd = 33,750 gpd Peak: 33,750 gpd x 1.21 = 40,834.5 gpd There are no existing or anticipated capacity issues; therefore, there are no LOS issues. Data Source: Collier County 2022 AUIR The proposed additional dwelling units will not create any LOS issues related to sanitary sewer. June 23, 2023 © GradyiN inor Page 1 of 4 Exhibit VE Public Facilities-rl.docx 1, IV[ I ETIORccrs • Land Stjncyors • PIail ncrs • i,andscapc ArChltW,,; Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, Fl, 34134 • 239-947-1144 • engineering@gradyminor.com • www.gradyminor.com Arterial and Collector Roads Please refer to the Traffic Impact Statement for discussion of the project's impact on the LOS for arterial and collector roadways within the project's radius of development influence. Drainage The County has adopted a LOS standard for private developments which requires development to occur consistent with water quantity and quality standards established in Ordinances 74-50, 90-10, 2001-2 and LDC Ordinance 2004-41, as may be amended. The property will be issued an Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), which has established requirements for water quality treatment, storm water runoff attenuation and controlled off -site discharge of storm water runoff. The proposed development is consistent with Collier County LOS standards. Solid Waste The proposed project is estimated to generate the following amounts of solid waste. LOS: 2 years of constructed lined cell capacity 555,384 Tons Available cell capacity 3,935,561 Tons Solid waste generation per year: Residential multi -family: 150 x 0.64 x 2.5 = 240 tons/year Total Solid Waste Generated Per Year = 240 tons The project is consistent with Collier County LOS standards and will nave no negative impact to the LOS standard. Data Source: Collier County 2022 AUIR Parks: Community and Regional The increased residential units will pay impact fees. No adverse impacts to Community or Regional Parks result from this new overlay as the project will pay impact fees. Crhnnlc The increased residential units will pay school impact fees. June 23, 2023 Page 2 of 4 Exhibit VE Public Facilities-rl.docx No adverse impacts to schools result from this new overlay as the project will pay impact fees. Fire Control. Sheriff and EMS The proposed project lies within the North Collier Fire and Rescue District. The North Collier Fire Control and Rescue District - Station #44, located at 8970 Hammock Oak Dr, and Station #46, 3410 Pine Ridge Road, which is approximately 3.8 miles and 2.6 miles from the property at Orange Blossom Drive and Airport Road. No significant impacts to Fire Control level of service are anticipated due to the proposed project. Estimated impact fees for EMS and fire would be determined at time of SDP based on the size or type of development. Sheriff, Fire Protection and EMS Services location/address of facilities intended to serve the project are; North Collier Fire Control and Rescue District - Station #44 8970 Hammock Oak Dr., Naples, FL 34108 North Collier Fire Control and Rescue District - Station #46 3410 Pine Ridge Road, Naples, FL 34105 Collier County Sheriff's Office - District 1 776 Vanderbilt Beach Rd, Naples, FL 34108 June 23, 2023 Page 3 of 4 Exhibit VE Public Facilities-rl.docx Existing Services and Public Facilities Map: Me�c �8 North Naple Fire Station 48 o � (DNCH Healthcare System � No ' Latndmark H spital O Z 0. 0 0 N U0 laic 44 Di trict 1 Vanderbilt each 2 jo SEAGATE I DR Ln — s4 1. aI 1 .1, L . ( SUBJECT o PROPERTY 0 Headqu rters 0 0 W F W 0 0 O 0 Medi2Nap Ia O® • e i r r rr f i R • '7 iVtANe DERBILT BEACH RD North Collie Fire Preve tion Burea and Support Services 00 d'0 PINE RIDGE RD PINE RI North Naples Fire Station 4 m Z d, GREI 0 n �611,, 1Vledi Z4 Medic 7 Fire Station :711 I GOLDEN GATEtPKY 0 G! June 23, 2023 Exhibit VE Public Facilities-rl.docx J Source- Esri, Maxar, Eartnc%a Gec.;r=.p ;,cs. and the GI CoTrnynity Legend Subject Property call other valuesa 1= Aquatic Park beach Park rim yr Boat Park Community Park Fitness Center Little League Fields A Neighborhood Park ;Aixxl Preserve Park ?tis Regional Park School Park Skate and 911 Parks State P ark '7 Libraries p hospital I M edical Center 0 Police Substation © Fire Station 0 EMS Stations • Schools Page 4 of 4 Al JMB TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, INC. TRAFFIC/TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING & PLANNING SERVICES TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (Collier County, Florida) February 8, 2023 Revised August 8, 2023 CounU TIS Review Fees TIS Methodology Review Fee = $500.00 TIS (Minor Study Review Fee =$750.00 Prepared by: JMv TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, INC. 471 1 7TH AVENUE 5W NAPLE5, FL❑RIDA 341 1 9 CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION No. 27S30 W M E3 PROJEGT Nm- 22 1 2 1 1) TABLE OF CONTENTS Conclusions 2 Methodology 3 Scope of Project 3 Table A - Proposed Land Use 3 Figure 1 - Location Map 3.1 Master Concept Plan 3.2 Project Generated Traffic 4 Table B - Net New Site -Generated Trips 4 Table 1 -"Trip Generation Computations 4.1 Existing + Committed Road Network 5 Project Traffic Distribution 5 Area of Significant impact 5 Figure 2 - Project Traffic Distribution 5.1 Table 2 - Area of Impact/Road Classification 5.2 2022 thru 2026 Project Build -out Traffic Conditions 6 Table 3 - 2022 & 2026 Link Volumes 6.1 Table 4 - 2026 Link Volumes/Capacity Analysis 6.2 Appendix 7 I Conclusions Based upon the findings of this report, it was determined that the proposed rezoning and subsequent redevelopment of the properties located at Mattson at Vanderbilt will not significantly or adversely impact the surrounding road network or cause any roadways to operate below their adopted level of service standard. More specifically, the proposed land use, which consists of 150 muti-family dwelling units and related amenities, will have less than a 2% impact on the adjacent road network. As established by Collier County's 2022 AUIR, the future 2026 background traffic demand on the segment of Vanderbilt Beach Road that will be directly accessed by the project is forecasted to exceed the road's adopted level of service standard. Although the project does not significantly or negatively impact any roads or cause any roads to operate below the adopted LOS standard, the Developer will be required to pay for its portion of "consumed" capacity via payment of road impact fees. As set forth by Collier County's Impact Fee Ordinance, the fees are a pro rata assessment towards the funding of area -wide transportation improvements to support new growth. The amount of road impact fees paid per type of land use are determined via a "consumption --based impact fee approach", in which new development is charged based upon the proportion of vehicle -miles of travel (VMT) that each unit of new development is expected to consume of a lane mile of roadway network. The cost of consumed lane mile is based upon current roadway construction costs within Collier County. Therefore, the payment of road impact fees is the project's pro rata share of funding transportation improvements that are deemed necessary to support the demands generated by new growth. Site -Related Transportation Improvements The project will dedicate an easement to Collier County Government for the installation of a Collier Area Transit (CAT) public -use bus stop. Northwest Traffic Concurrepey Mana ement Area TCMA The site is located within the Northwest Traffic Concurrency Management Area (N'W- TCMA) and the road network within that TMCA is currently operating at 94.0% of the lane miles meeting standards. This project contains an affordable housing element (22.6% AHU) and is exempt from this TCMA policy, and therefore it is not applicable to this project. Furthermore, the Applicant is not requesting to be exempt from link -specific concurrency and is not required to provide TDM strategies. Regardless, the project will provide two (2) TDM strategies, which are: c.) interconnecting with the on -street sidewalk and bicycle lane system along Vanderbilt Beach Road and e.) per LDC 6.02.02 the affordable housing units satisfy a TDM strategy. 2 Methodology On December 201,, 2022, a Traffic Impact Statement (T1S) Methodology Report was submitted to the office of Collier County Transportation Planning Department. The $500. 00 methodology meeting fee will be paid at the time of submitting the zoning application. A copy of the TIS methodology has been provided in the appendix (refer to pages M1 thru M10). Scope of Project The properties located at 3375 and 3333 Vanderbilt Beach Road were previously developed as a veterinarian clinic and equestrian riding facility and each use having a separate access on Vanderbilt Beach Road. It is proposed to rezone, raze and then redevelop the properties with a residential development that will consist of no more than 150 multi -family dwelling units and associated on -site amenities. The residential community will also ensure that 22.6% of the constructed units will satisfy Collier County's affordable housing policy. The site is located on the north side of Vanderbilt Beach Road and east of Livingston Road, within Collier County, Florida. The project proposes to eliminate one (1) of the previously constructed access points on Vanderbilt Beach Road and maintain one (1) right-in/out access on Vanderbilt Beach Road. Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD is expected to be completed by or before the year 2027. For additional details, refer to the Master Concept Plan (page 3.1). Table A Proposed Land Use Existing Land Uses Proposed Land Uses Number of Units Veterinarian Clinic & To be Razed Equestrian Riding Facility Multi -Family 150 d.u.'s (22.6% to be Affordable Housing) R3 w CL N N 0 Piper Rd Immakvlee Rd 0 0 D� a• C 0 C CM 7 C J 01 ar Vanderbilt Beach Rd ..wrw 2� M� �r� ■�r� ■Mrs i Oronae Blossom Dr Daniel Arbour Center Wa 3z V llag s R Hunters Sandalwo Osceola Trail I Sable Rdi in f I Bottlebrus Naples Blvd I Livingston Pine Ride Road I l Immokolee Rd l �r ■wr GMM mom mom 4" ■..� `0 Autumn Oaks Lane m Hidden Oaks Lane v m v 0 Spanish Oaks Lone a 1 Golden Oaks Lone M -0 0 Standing Oaks Lone O Shady Oaks Lane ' Bur Oaks Lane English Oaks Lone r- .,walk Circle ' d Rd NORTH N.T.S. 1 ' od Ln m v rn ge Ln 1 _J LEGEND h Ln INTERSTATE HIGHWAY rrrrrM ■ 6-LANE ARTERIAL �••• 4-LANE ARTERIAL/COLLEGTOR — Woods Ln 2-LANE ARTERIAL/COLLECTOR a� 2-LANE COLLECTOR/LOCAL o Kramer rrr.n rrrrr � VA 0 ❑o a v ]C JIVBTRANSPORTATION EN©INEERINI.3, INC. 3375 & 3333 VBR RPUD Project Location & FIGURE I December 19, 2022 Roadway Classification 3.1 w i-3 ZONED: BRADFORD SQUARE M PU D USE: ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY ZONED: PELICAN MARSH DRI/PUD USE: GOLF COURSE 1 RESIDENTIAL NO BUFFER REQUIRED CD j 1 R R I m1 ti } oo_ WATER J �I MANAGEMENT ZONED: THE VANDERBILT TRUST 1989 CFPU❑ to USE: ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY R �I 15' WIDE TYPE'D' LAN f I w.wl ..w 1 c AMENITY AREA ! m J' 10' FPL EASEMENT i... _I I I(OR 2232, PG 1 F9) POTENTIAL VEHICULAR/PEDESTRIAN 4 INTERCONNECTION DE BUFFER E II�M IAA I UPI" -"= I — E — i — J111111111,111 VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD N 0 60, l o❑l SCALE: 1" = 100' WHEN PLOTTED ® S.5" X 11" L'GEND R RESIDENTIAL U 1;r:uh KIIllai, -W �Ig60CIFEIA•r. P.A. �xI`adyMiiior .F li4p 3 13S' Kaolin 6pE?EIRy. FIUr•Ins, 9.1139 Civil Fn lnccr3 . Land 3umey'o1:y • I'lunnols I„ rodhcn rc rirchllcclrl 1 Cerl. or All& Eit0003151 Cori. ,d:1u1h. Lit 0000 15 1 lsupluris V: 26I1002GG Ronlla Springs: 239.947.1144 it Evly. rend.,wooP. roo fart ,%Tyters: 239.690.4380 33 75 AND 3333 VBR RPUD 5CALE: JOB CODE; 49naA-2a EXHIBIT C MASTER PLAN SATE: ocraara soya z KLE NA&M omall' C UkU70 PIM SHEET 1 OF 2 Project Generated Traffic Traffic that can be expected to be generated by Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD was estimated based upon the guidelines established by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Manual, I Vh Edition. That is, historical traffic data collected at similar land uses was relied upon in estimating the project's traffic. It was concluded that land use code Multi -Family (LUC 220) as most appropriate in estimating the new trips; and land use code Animal HospitallVeterinarian Clinic (LUC 640) was used for determining the existing site -generated trips. In order to determine the proj ect's net new traffic, the estimated trips for the existing uses were subtracted from the estimated total trips for the proposed. That is, Proposed Development Trips minus Existing Development Trips = Net New Trips As determined, the proj ect's net new trips will be 47 vph and 64 vph new trips during the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. Table 1 depicts the computations performed in determining the total new trips. Table B provides a summary of the trip generation computation results that are shown in Table 1. Table B Site -Generated Trips (Summation o *Table 1 New Daily Weekday New AM Peak Hour New PM Peak Hour Land Use Trips Generated Trips Generated Trips Generated ADT (vph (vph) Existing (to be razed) Veterinarian Clinic 129 22 22 and Equestrian Center Proposed 150 Multi -Family 1,037 69 85 Tri s Ca Net New Trips 908 47 +63 The report concludes that the project will generate more than 50 new trip ends during the weekday highest peak hour. As such, the report investigates the traffic impacts associated with the project based upon the criteria set forth by the Collier County Government's Traffic Impact Statement Guidelines for developments generating "more than 50 trips", which is defined as a minor study. 4 TABLE 1 TRIP GENERATION COMPUTATIONS 3375/3333 VBR RPUD lj 0- ' 61"��Ti111m Code Land Use Description Build Schedule 220 Multi -family (low Rise) 150 Units Code Trip Period Trip Generation Equation Total Trips Trips Enter/Exit LUC 220 Daily Traffic (ADT) = T = 6.41(X) + 75.31= 1,037 ADT AM Peak Hour (vph) = T = 0.31N + 22.85 = 69 vph 17 f 52 vph 24% Enter/ 76% Exit = PM Peak Hour {vph} = T = 0.43(X) + 20.55 = 85 vph 54 / 31 vph 63% Enter/ 37% Exit = EXISTING LAND USE (to be displaced) Code Land Use Description Build Schedule 640 Animal Hospital/Veterinary Clinic 6,000 s.f. Code Trip Period_ Trip Generation_Ecluation Total Trips Trips Enter Exit LUC 640 Daily Traffic (ADT) = T= 21.50(X) = 129 ADT AM Peak Hour (vph) T= 4.07(X) - 2.48 = 22 vph 15 / 7 vph 7-9 AM 67% Enter/ 33% Exit = PM Peak Hour (vph) = T= 4.75(X) - 6.96 = 22 vph 9 / 13 vph 4-6 PM 40% Enter/ 60% Exit = NET NEW TRIPS Tota I Trips Trips Enter/Exit 908 ADT 47 vph 2 / 45 vph 63 vph 45 18 vph 4.1 Existing + Committed Road Network Figure 1 and Table 2 provide a detail of the surrounding E + C roadways. Table 2 also depicts the adjacent roads' respective minimum level of service performance standards and capacity. The principal arterial that will provide immediate access to Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD is Vanderbilt Beach Road. Vanderbilt Beach .Road is classified as a six -lane divided major arterial. The road functions as a primary cast/west corridor that extends between its western terminus at the intersection of U.S. 41 and its eastern terminus to the east of Collier Boulevard. Within proximity of the site, the posted speed limit along Vanderbilt Beach Road is 45 MPH. Project Traffic Distribution The project's net new traffic was distributed to the surrounding road network based upon logical means of ingress/egress, current and future traffic patterns in the area. The distribution of trips considers surrounding land uses such as employment opportunities, medical land uses, retail centers and recreational attractions. Figure 2 and Table 2 provide a detail of the traffic distributions based on a percentage basis. Table 2 also depicts the project traffic by directional volume. Area of Significant Impact The area of significant impact was determined based upon Collier County's 2%, 2% and 3% criteria (i.e., if the project's traffic is 2% or more of a roadway's adopted level of service capacity, then the project has a significant impact upon that link). Figure 2 depicts the project traffic distributions and Table 2 describes the level of impact on the surrounding roadways. Roads that were identified as being within the project's area of impact are shown in Table 2. As shown, the proposed land use will have less than a 2% impact on the adjacent road network, and therefore does not significantly impact have a de minimis impact on the adjacent road network. 5 L a a izi W o Q 0 r b C-) F 0) N IF a- Q. U 5% - Immokalee Rd Immokolee Rd `0 Autumn Oaks Lane a a � m m Hidden Oaks Lane 0 i m D QSpanish Oaks Lane a' 'v Golden Oaks Lane c - 'o 'm CL 0 0 f° Standing Oaks Lane 0 c a o 0. 0 m J cl c Shady Oaks Lane 'S �c a J Bur Oaks Lane 41 CD N M] 4 English Oaks Lane 10 .+..w r 'MWMMr r.� ...... w Vanderbilt Beach Rd r 0 N Ln IF N IF 7Villagewolk Circle Orange Blossom Dr Daniels Rd c I k J ' IHunters Rd NORTH -a IN.T.S. Arbour Wal Sandalwood Ln o ade Center Way�p Osceola Trail J & C Blvd o a Sable Rdige Ln � in w L I N vy FeR 8attlebrush Ln Naples BlvdLivingston Woods Ln o� Pl, a Kramerww� _ rrrrrr � —+ 0 0 LEGEND I � a I ' v $ 0 ■ Proj+?ct Traffic Di- tr k�i inn Y 3375 & 3333 VBR RPUD Project Location & FIGURE 2 December 19, 2022 Roadway Classification 5.1 Project Traffic Peak Direction (vphpd) = Project Traffic Non -Peak Direction (vph) Airport Pulling Rd N W-TCMA NW-TCMA Immokalee Road NW-TCMA N W-TCMA Livingston Road U1 NW-TCMA NW-TCMA Pine Ridge Road EC-TCMA TABLE 2 PROJECT'S AREA OF IMPACT 45 Entering 18 Exiting LDS Service Project Project PK Dir. PK Direction Project Pk Hr Project Pk Hr Project Road Serv. Vol. Volume Traffic PK Dir Pk Hr Non-PK Dir Non -Pk Impact Percent Significant Class LOS v[ ph_pd) % Dist. vt phpol, Pk Dir (vph) ❑iR Standard Impact Impact 1.0 Immokalee to Vanderbilt 4D D 2200 5% 2 S 1 N 3% 0.10❑/b NO 2.1 Vanderbilt Each Rd to Orange Blossc 6D E 3000 20% 9 N 4 S 3% 0.30% NO 42.1 Airport Road to Livingston Rd 6D E 3100 5% 2 E 1 W 3% 0.07% NO 42.2 Livingston Rd to 1-75 6D18❑ E 3500 15% 7 W 3 E 3% 0.19% NO 51.0 Imperial St to Immokalee Rd 614D ❑ 3000 10% 5 S 2 N 3% 0.15% NO 52.0 Immokalee Rd to Vanderbilt 6❑ E 3100 30% 14 S 5 N 2% 0.44% NO 53.0 Vanderbilt to Pine Ridge Rd 6D E 3100 25% 11 N 5 S 2% 0.36% NO 54.0 Pine Ridge Rd to Golden Gate PkM 6D E 3100 15% 7 N 3 S 3% 0.22% NO 67.2 Livingston Road to 1-75 Vanderbilt Beach Rd NW-TCMA 110.2 Goodlette Frank to Airport Rd NW-TCMA 111.1 Airport Rd to Livingston Rd NW-TCMA 111.2.a Livingston Road to Site NW-TCMA 111.2.b Site to Logan Blvd 6D E 3900 10% 5 W 2 E 3% 0.12% NO 4D16D D 2500 15% 7 E 3 W 2% 0.27% NO 6D E 3000 40% 18 E 7 W 2% 0.60% NO 6D E 3000 95% 43 E 17 W 2% 1.43% NO 6D E 3000 5% 2 W 1 E 2% 0.08% NO 2022 thru 2026 Project Build -out Traffic Conditions In order to establish 2022 thru 2026 project build -out traffic conditions, two forecasting methods were used. The first traffic forecasting method was the County's traffic count data was adjusted for peak season conditions, peak hour conditions, peak direction, and an annual growth rate was then applied. The pear season/peak hour/peak direction factor and annual growth rate were derived from the 2022 Collier County AUIR Report. Using the annual growth rate, the 2022 background traffic conditions were determined, which are depicted in Table 3. The second traffic forecasting method was to add the vested trips (trip bank) identified in the 2022 AUIR report to the adjusted peak season, peak hour and peak direction traffic counts. The 2026 vested trips "+" background traffic volumes are depicted in Table 3. The greater of the two values produced by the two forecasting procedures was then considered to reflect the 2026 background traffic. The net new project generated traffic was then added to the background traffic. Table 4 provides a summary of the 2022 thru 2026 traffic conditions and the roadways' level of service and remaining available capacity. As determined, the proposed rezoning and subsequent redevelopment of the properties located at 3375 and 3333 Vanderbilt Beach Road will not significantly or adversely impact the surrounding road network or cause any roadways to operate below their adopted level of service standard. More specifically, the proposed land use, which consists of 150 muti-family dwelling units and related amenities, will have less than a 2% impact on the adjacent road network. As established by Collier County's 2022 AUIR, the future 2026 background traffic demand on the segment of Vanderbilt Beach Road that will be directly accessed by the project is forecasted to exceed the road's adopted level of service standard. 6 TABLE 3 2022 & 2026 ROADWAY LINK VOLUMES Per Vested Trips Methc Per Growth Rate Method 2026 2026 Peak Hour 2022 Growth Peak Hour PK Direction AUIR AUIR Rate PK Direction Trip Background Traffic Pk per Background Bank Per Vested Trips y{ phpd) DiR AUIR (vl2hpd) Nohpd] y( phnd) Airport Pulling Rd 1.0 lmmokalee to Vanderbilt 1480 N 2.00% 1602 40 1520 2.1 Vanderbilt Bch Rd to Orange Blossor 2250 N 2.00% 2435 43 2293 Livingston Road 52.0 lmmokalee Rd to Vanderbilt 2000 N 2.00% 2165 22 2022 53.0 Vanderbilt to Pine Ridge Rd 1530 N 2.00% 1656 0 1530 Vanderbilt Beach Rd 110.2 Goodlette Frank to Airport Rd 1860 E 2.00% 2013 61 1921 111.1 Airport Rd to Livingston Rd 2840 E 4.00% 3322 4 2844 111.2.a Livingston Road to Site 2580 E 4.00% 3018 126 2706 111.2.b Site to Logan Blvd 2580 E 4.00% 3018 126 2706 TABLE 4 2026 ROA13'111rAY LINK VOLUMEICAPACITY ANALYSIS 2026 2026 2026 2026 2026 2022 Peak Hour Peak Hour Project Project Build -Out Serv. Vol. Build -Out Build -Out Peak Hour PK Direction Bkgd PK Direction Pk Hr Prjct Pk Hr Prjct Peak Hour Pk Hr Peak Hour Peak Hour PK Direction Background Pk Background PK Dir Pk Nan-PK Dir Non -Pk PK Dir PK Dir PK Direction PK Direction Airport Pulling Rd v[ phpd) L05 v�d) Dir LOS (vphpd) Dir (vph) Dir v{ phpd) (vphpd) vlc Ratio LOS NW-TCMA 1.0 Immokalee to Vanderbilt 1480 C 1602 N C 2 S N 1603 2200 0.73 C NW-TCMA 2.1 Vanderbilt Bch Rd to Orange E 2250 ❑ 2435 N ❑ N 4 S 2444 3000 0.81 ❑ Livingston Road NW-TCMA 52.0 Immokalee Rd to Vanderbilt 2000 C 2022 N C 14 S N 2028 3100 0.65 C NW-TCMA 53.0 Vanderbilt to Pine Ridge Rd 1530 B 1656 N B N 5 S 1657 3100 0.54 B Vanderbilt Beach Rd NW-TCMA 110.2 Goodlette Frank to Airport Rd 1860 C 2013 E C E 3 W 2020 2500 0.81 C NW-TCMA 111.1 Airport Rd to Livingston Rd 2840 D 3322 E F E 8 W 3340 3000 1.11 F NW-TCMA 11 1.2a Livingston Road to Site 2580 ❑ 3018 E F E 18 W 3061 3000 1.02 F NW-TCMA 11 1.2.L Site to Logan Blvd 2580 D 3018 E F 2 W E 3019 3000 1.01 F Support Documents APPENDIX VA JMB TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, INC. TRAFFIC/TRANSPORTATIQN ENGINEERING & PLANNING SERVICES TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT METHODOLOGY 3375/3333 Vanderbilt Beach Road RPUD (Collier County, Florida) December 20, 2022 County TIS .Review Fees I'IS Methodology Review Fee = $500.00 ?'IS (Minor Study) Review Fee =$750. 00 Prepared by: %TMB TRANSP❑RTATION ENGINEERING, INC. 4711 7TH AVENUE SW NAPLES, FLoRIOA 341 1 9 CERTIFICATE OF AUTHoRIZA-rioN No. 27830 W M B PROJECT No. 221 21 1) f il ' ' "/" e 7 1 � JAM ES M BANKS, P.E. DATE FLORID EG. No. 43860 M1 In 1J, NLTI_ i -! YMTIAL MEETING CHECKLIST Suggestion: Use this Appendix as a worksheet to ensure that no important elements are overlooked. Cross out the items that do not apply. Date:12-20-2022 Time: Location: Collier CoMpty Government Offices(North Horseshoe Drive People Attendin : Name, Organization, and Telephone Numbers 1) James M. Banks, JMB Transportation Engineering, Inc., 239-919-2767 2) Michael Sawyer, Collier County Goverment 3) Studv Preparer: Preparer's Name and Title: James M Banks P.E. President Organization: JMB Transportation Engineering, Inc. Address & Telephone Number: 4711 7th Avenue SW Na les Florida 34119 239 -919- 2767 Reviewers : Reviewer's Name & Title: Michael Saws Collier County Transportation Division Applicant: Applicant's Name: Address: Telephone Number: Proposed Development_ Name: 3 3 7513 3 3 3 Vanderbilt Beach Road RPUD Location: 3375/3333 Vanderbilt Beach Road _11 i . E /? side of VBR and east of Livm Land Use Type: Multi -Family (3�/o affordable housing) ITE Code #: LUC 220 SO Proposed number of development units: -M5 multi -family Description: Zoning: Existing: Veterinary Clinic to be displaced) and an Equestrian Center (to be displaced) Comprehensive plan recommendation: Requested: Findings of the Preliminary Study: See the attached httpslld.docs.live, neY8481204edbdac2cb1DesktopIProFac 2212Ii VBHRPUDIMethodo[ogyAeport.doc M2. Study Type: Minor TIS Study Area: Boundaries: Based upon the Coun 's 2% 2% & 3% impact rule. See attached Additional intersections to be analyzed: None Horizon Year(s): 2026 Analysis Time Period(s): PM Peak Future Off -Site Developments: None Source of Trip Generation Rates: ITE Trip Generation Manual I Ith Edition see Table 1 Reductions in Trip Generation Rates: Pass -by trips: None Internal trips (PUD): Transmit use: Other: Horizon Year Roadway Network Improvements: Collier County's 5-year CIE. Methodology & Assumptions: Non -site traffic estimates: See Attached Site -trip generation: See Table I Trip distribution method: Based upon manual assignment (See Table 2 & Figure 2) Traffic assignment method: Traffic growth rate: Per Collier County Historical & Current AUIR Reports, but not less than 2% or back ound or vested trips method whichever is gLeater. e. htleslld.docs.five.+ia6'8481204edbdac2cblOesktopIPfo,,iectsQ2'1211 VBR RPU➢A',etlioda'ogvReDr t.dx M3 Special Features: (from preliminary study or prior experience) Accidents locations: Sight distance: Queuing: Access location & configuration: Traffic control: Signal system location & progression needs: On -site parking needs: Data Sources: Base maps: Prior study reports: Access policy and jurisdiction: Review process: Requirements: Miscellaneous: Small Scale Study — No Fee Minor Study - $750.00 X Major Study - $1500.00 Includes 2 intersections Additional Intersections - $500.00 each None All fees will he agreed to during the Methodology meeting and must he paid to Transportation prior to our sign -off on the application. Reviewers Applicant n!tpsYld.docs.live,netl848l204edbdac2chIDesktopIProiecfsi221211 V8R RPUD1Me1Wa16gyRexrtdoc M4 L rfj m + 0 CL `v a Q L V 1 Piper Rd Immokalee Rd 1 � = � lmmakalee Rd -v Autumn Oaks Lane o > m v m •3 G a CL e v 1 v � � m c -v a N IrCP a a c c � � 1 CL M 1 i L Vanderbilt Beach Rd in n I 1 Villagewal:Cirrcle Orange B 1 ssom Dr Daniels Rd 55 0 Hunters Rd 0 Arbour WOE sa^dV!wvoVd L^ � ide Center Way _ S Osceola Trail J & C Blvd Sable Rdige Ln in En B❑ttlebrush Ln a Naples Blvd J Pi Livingston Woods Ln Ridge Road n Kr Of 0 CL .0. Hidden Oaks Lane Spanish Oaks Lane v z L m Golden Oaks Lane '2 7 p ❑ CZ M Standing Oaks Lane as O C" Shady Oaks Lane -J Bur Oaks Lane English Oaks Lane NORTH z N.T_5. a m J 0 m C v 13012M;7 INTERSTATE HIGHWAY ■ 6—LANE ARTERIAL ■� —I aME ARTERIAL/COLLECTOR NE ►,RTERVIk' COLLECTOR ME COLLECTORAOCAL JIMTRANSFORTATION ENE3INEERING, INC. 3375 & 3333 VBR RPUD Project Location & FIGURE I Classification December 19, 2022 1 Roadway M 50 TABLE 1 RIP GENERATION COMPUTATIONS 3375/3333 VBR RPUD PROPOSED LAND USE Code Land Use Description 220 Multi -Family (Low Rise) 220 it ulti-Famiiu► (Affordabio i4morzino) Build Schedule 150 Units .A; i in itrz 105 Units Code Trip Period Trip Generation Equation Total Trips LUC 220 Daily Traffic (ADT) = T = 6.41(X) + 75.31= 748 ADT AM Peak Hour (vph) = T = 0.31M + 22.85 = 55 vph 24% Enter/ 76% Exit = PM Peak Hour (vph) = T = 0.43M + 20.55 = 66 vph Fquf Pntprl R701 Pvit = EXISTING LAND USE (to be displaced) Code Land Use Description 640 Animal Hospital/Veterinary Clinic Code Trip Period LUC 640 ❑aily Traffic {ADT} AM Peak Hour (vph) = 7-9 AM PM Peak Hour (vph) = 4-6 PM Build Schedule 6,000 s.f. Trio Generation Eauation T= 21.50(X ) = T=4.07(X)-2.48= 67% Enter/ 33% Exit = T= 4.75(X) - 6.96 = 40% Enter/ 60% Exit = Tota I Trips 1Z9 ADT 22 vph 22 vph 3 -: x. -r*** T*1 +: i,***��* i.7 * * * * Fi�;F fifi 41 i� ik ;F FJF****h *,F�4` ****i;*********3.6 F***3�*******3,**3 ;&,�iF*.*JF JF NET NEW NEW TRIPS Total Trips 619 ADT 44 vph Trips Enter/Exit 13 / 42 vph 42 / 24 vph Trips Enter/Exit 15 / 7 vph 9/13 vph Trips Enter Exit _2 / 35 nk 33 / 11 vph AA a C] � p1 Ld Q. C] 5%�H Immokalee Rd m .3 of -13d v I a M 0 o N - L lil) T -- G"im, M� 2 Vanderbilt Beach Rd 0 0 � N Village Oranae Blossom_ Dr rMniels Re Arbour Center Wo N r Naples Blvd I Pi a . a a L a 0 3 v Immokalee Rd 4i =4 ..... aaa�In" � to 1 ilk Circle IHunters Rd 1 I Sandalwood Ln Osceola Trail Sable Bottlebrush Ln Ln Livingston Woods Ln Ridge Road 0% v o r w Y Autumn Oaks Lane Hidden Oaks Lane Spanish Oaks Lane v z 17' m Golden Oaks Lane o 0 v m 3 0 ;� Standing Oaks Lone m v c v a rn 0 Shady Oaks Lane -.1 Bur Oaks Lane English Oaks Lane NQRTH N.T.S. FA � rrrrr a )■rat a a a a a�— LEGEND I 1 00M r'ralcc--t Traffic- DkAribut➢are 337*5 & 3333 VBR RPUD Project Location & FIGURE 2 December 19, 2022 Roadway Classification M1 Project Traffic Peak. Direction {vphpd) = Project Traffic Non -Peak Direction (vph) _ 54 Entering 31 Exiting Airport Pulling Rd 1.0 Immokalee to Vanderbilt 2.1 Vanderbilt Bch Rd to Orange B1ossc Immokalee Road 42.1 Airport Road to Livingston Rd 42.2 Livingston Rd to 1-75 Livingston Road 51.0 Imperial St to lrnmokalee Rd NW-TCMA 52.0 Immokalee Rd to Vanderbilt NW-TCMA 53.0 Vanderbilt to Pine Ridge Rd 54.0 Pine Ridge Rd to Golden Gate PkM Pine Ridge Road 67.2 Livingston Road to 1-75 Vanderbilt Beach Rd NW-TCMA 110.2 Goodlette Frank to Airport Rd NW-TCMA 111.1 Airport Rd to Livingston Rd NW-TCMA 111.2.a Livingston Road to Site NW-TCMA 111.2.b Site to Logan Blvd TABLE 2 P R,OJ EOT'S AREA OF IMPACT LOS Service Project Project PK Dir. PK Direction Project Pk Hr Project Pk Hr Project Road Serv. Vol. Volume Traffic PK I:)ir Pk Hr Non-FIK ❑ir Non -Pk Impact Percent Significant Class Li3S Rhpd) % Dist. yphpdd Pk Dir LLhI DiR Standard Impact IM Imt 4D ID 2200 5% 2 S N 3% 0.07% NO 6D 1M 3000 20% 6 N 11 S 3% 0.21 % NO 6D I. 3100 5% 2 E W 3% 0.05% N0 6DI8D I= 3500 15% 5 W 8 E 3% 0.13% NO 6AD 17 3000 10% 3 S %. N 3% 0.10% NO 6❑ 1= 3100 30% 9 S 16 N 2% 0.30% NO 6❑ I= 3100 25% 8 N 14 S 2% 0.25% N0 6D I= 3100 15% 5 N 8 S 3% 0.15% NO 6D I. 3900 10% 3 w Jr, E 3% 0.08% N0 4D16❑ 1) 2500 15% 5 E 8 W 2% 0.19% NO 6D 1= 3000 40% 12 E 2:2 W 2% 0.41 % NO 6D 1= 3000 95% 29 E 51 W 2% 0.98% NO 6D I= 3000 5% 2 W E 2% 0.05% N0 TABLE 3 2022 & 20'►26 ROADWAY LINK VOLUMES Airport Pulling Rd 1.0 Immokalee 'to Vanderbilt 2.1 Vanderbilt Sch Rd to Orange Blossor Livingston Road 52.0 Immokalee Rd to Vanderbilt 53.0 Vanderbilt to Pine Ridge Rd Vanderbilt Beach Rd 110.2 Goodlette Frank to Airport Rd 111.1 Airport Rd to Livingston Rd 111.2.a Livingston Road to Site 111.2.b Site to Logan Blvd Per Vested Trips Methc Per Growth Rate Method 2026 2026 Peak Hour 2022 Growth Peak Hour PK Direction AUIR AUIR Rate PK Direction Trip Background Traffic Pk pier Background Bank Per Vested Trips (vRhg�d ❑iR AIJIR y[ phpol v� 2hpd] v h d 1480 N 2.00% 1602 40 1520 2250 N 2.00% 2435 43 2253 2000 N 2.00% 2165 22 2022 1530 N 2.00% 1656 0 1530 1860 E 2.00% 2013 61 1921 2840 E 2.92% 3187 4 2844 2580 E 3.73% 2987 126 2706 2580 E 3.73% 2987 126 2706 TABLE 4 2026 ROADWAY LINK VOLUMEXAPACITY ANALYSIS 2026 2026 2026 2026 2026 2022 Peak Hour Peak Hour Project Project Build -Out Serv. Vol. Build -Out Build -Out Peak Hour PK Direction Bkgd PK Direction Pk Hr Prjct Pk Hr Prjct Peak Hour Pk Hr Peak Hour Peak Hour PK Direction Background Pk Background PK Dir Pk Non-PK Dir Non -Pk PK Dir PK Dir PK Direction PK Direction (whpd) LOS v[ phpd] Dir LOS (yphpd) Dir (vph) I]ir ►►� phpol (vphpd) v/c Ratio LOS Airport Pulling Rd 1.0 Immokalee to Vanderbilt 1480 C 1602 N C 2 S N 1605 2200 0.73 C 2.1 Vanderbilt Bch Rd to Orange E 2250 D 2435 N D G N 11 S 2442 3000 0.81 D Livingston Road NW-TCMA 52.0 Immokalee Rd to Vanderbilt 2000 C 2022 N C 9 S N 2038 3100 0.66 C NW-TCMA 53.0 Vanderbilt to Pine Ridge Rd 1530 6 1656 N B 8 N 14 S 1664 3100 0.54 B Vanderbilt Beach Rd NW-TCMA 110.2 Goodlette Frank to Airport Rd 1860 C 2013 E C 5 E 8 W 2018 2500 0.81 C NW-TCMA 111.1 Airport Rd to Livingston Rd 2840 E 3187 E F 12 E 22 W 3199 3000 1-07 F NW-TCMA 111.2.E Livingston Road to Site 2580 D 2987 E F 29 E 51 W 3016 3000 1-01 F 111.2.1c Site to Logan 131vd 2580 D 2987 E F 2 W E 2990 3000 1.00 F INSTR 6326998 OR 6188 PG 2782 E-RECORDED 11/7/2022 2:24 PM PAGES 3 CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT AND COMPTROLLER, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA Doc@.70 $22,400.00 REC $27.00 CONS $3,200,000.00 THIS DOCUMENT PREPARED Matthew L. Grabinski, Esq. Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, Northern Trust Bank Building 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite Naples, Florida 34103 AFTER RECORDING RETURN' David N. Morri Quarles & Brac 1395 Panther L Naples, Florida Consideration: $3,200,000.00._ - Parcel ID:00200240000" SZ THIS INDENTURE, r Florida limited liability comp Way, Naples, Florida 34109, to Grantee, whose mailing addrE Tamiami Trail North, Suite 40 WITNESSETH that s, No/100 ($10.00) Dollars, and o paid by said Grantee, the receipt and sufficiency when granted, bargained and sold to the said Grantee, and Gran following described land, situate, lying and being in Collier See Schedule 1. hereby acknowledged, has `ers and assigns forever, the y,.-Florida, to -wit: and this conveyance is subject to real estate taxes for 2022 and subsuent years and conditions, restrictions and easements of record, but without hereby reimposing any of the same. And said Grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said land, and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. "Grantor" and "Grantee" are used for singular or plural, as context requires. OR 6188 Pc 2783 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Grantor has hereunto set our hand and seal the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence: reen Sullivan Print Name: Matthew L. STATE OF COUNTY OF GRANTOR: SBP Stable, LLC, a Florida limited liability company By Grant Phelan, Manager I HEREBY CERTIFY that the -lore executed before me in person or by..;i 2022 by Grant Phelan, as Manager of SBP Stale on behalf of the company. Who is pees as i EMJ ULLIVANN # GG 961998ne 24, 2024Public Underwriters instrument was acknowledged and tarization on this ' day of. October., a, ; ted liability company, nowx� _to- or has produced Notary Public, Printed Name: My commission N n Statutory Warranty Deed - Page 2 *** OR 6188 PG 2784 *** SCHEDULEI Legal Description The land referred to herein below is situated in the County of COLLIER, State of Florida, and described as follows: The East half of the East half of the South half of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of Sectio 31, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Less the South 150.00 feet for right-of-way, to b ing more particularly described as follows: Commence at-flhe=Southwest corner of Section 31, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Flo-rid;,.thence run South 89 degrees 56' 12" East, along the South line of the Southwest qu r eer i,said Section 31 for a distance of 991.18 feet to the Southwest corner of the East haj£f6 the East half of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of said Section 31; thence run North 02 degrees 11' 42" West along the West line of the East half of the East half of the Sothwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of said Section 31, for a distance of 150.12 feeto a point on the North right- of -way line of Vanderbilt Beach Road, a 150.00 foot right-0 -way, , shown on FDOT right-of-way map Section 03512- 2601, dated 11-21-78, said point lyinP0.Q0 feet North of, as measured at right angles to the South line of the Southwest qu46r of sad Section 31 and also being the Point of Beginning of the parcel of land herein descril dd-,., hence continue North 02 degrees 11' 42" West, along the West line of the East half of tho` Fast half of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of said Section 31, for a distant o5117.35 feet to a point on the North line of the East half of the East half of the Sout hal :4 the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of said Section 31; thence run So 89 ogrees 56' 42" East, along said North line of the East half of the East half of the South,alf of "the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of said Section 31, for a distance of`0.Q9*feet to a point on the East line of the East half of the East half of the Southwest quarter, the Southwest quarter of said Section 31; thence run South 02 degrees 13' 16" East, along the East line of the East half of the East half of the of the Southwest quarter of the Souths . quarter of said Section 31, for a 5 distance of 517.41 feet to a point on the North right-of-way :' line of said Vanderbilt Beach Road; thence run North 89 degrees 56' 12" West pal with the South line of the Southwest quarter of said Section 31 and along said North r' ht-of way line for a distance of 330.33 feet to the Point of Beginning. t _ Bearings shown hereon refer to the South Line of the Southw st quarter of Section 31, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, as being S 89° 56' 12" E. Statutory Warranty Deed - Page 3 INSTR 6326917 OR 6188 PG 2567 E-RECORDED 11/7/2022 1:01 PM PAGES 2 CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT AND COMPTROLLER, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA Doc@.70 $18,200.00 REC $18.50 CONS $2,600,000.00 This Instrument prepared without review or opinion of title by: Gregory W. Wetzel Conroy, Conroy & Durant, P.A. 2210 Vanderbilt Beach Road, Suite 1201 Naples, FL 34109 Parcel ID: ,. 2f�222 , 000 Consideration: $2, ,OMN This Indenture is a Florida Corporation, ("Grp VBR, LLC, a Florida limited Suite 402, Naples, FL 34103. WITNESSETH that the Warranty Deed 31st day of October, 2022, Between Basil Properties, Inc., "):of 2214 Regal Way, Naples, FL 34110, and 3333/3375 ritY company, ("Grantee") of 3838 Tamiami Trail North, in consideration of the sum of TEN DOLLARS ($10.00), and other good and valuable n�idoration to Grantor in hand paid by Grantee, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged; as granted, bargained and sold to the said Grantee and Grantee's heirs, successors and assigns for 6r;,the following described land, situate, lying and being in the County of Collier, State of F orid�(O,wit: THE EAST 1/2 OF THE WEST 1/2 04 I AST 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF TH O THWEST 1/4, LESS THE SOUTH 150 FEET, OF SECTION 31, TOWT SHH` 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.° SUBJECT TO comprehensive land use plans, zoning, and other land use restrictions, prohibitions and requirements imposed by governmental autWffty restrictions and matters appearing on the Plat or otherwise common to the subdivision; outstanding oil, gas and mineral rights of record without right of entry; unplatted public utility easemifs>of record; and taxes for the year 2022 and subsequent years. TOGETHER WITH all tenements, hereditaments and appurtenanc&stlereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the same in fee simple forever. And the Grantor hereby covenants with said Grantee that Grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that Grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that Grantor hereby fully warrants title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. File No.: 18019-02 Warranty Deed Page 1 of 2 *** OR 6188 PG 2568 *** IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has hereunto set its hand and seal as of the year and date first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of two witnesses: Basil Properties, Ific, a Florida Corporation Les t Witness # 51911 above Witness #2 sign a ovc n . _ Samantha L. MacLeod Witness #1 nriAt name above STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was acknove presence or [ ] online notarization, this day of Basil Properties, Inc., a Florida Corporatit personally known to me or who [f] has produced identification. Not Seal SAMAAfTHAI.MACLEOD * * �= MY COMMISSION # HH 2O4682 EXPIRES: April 4, 2026 *� Bonded Thru Notary Public Underwriters Witness #2 print name above File No.: 18019-02 Warranty Deed Page 2 of 2 me, by means of [ ] physical 2022, by Lesli Reiff, President If of the company, who is [ .I t as AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PL20220001010 and PL20220001011 1 David J. Stevens (print name), as President (title, if applicable) of 3333W75 veR LLc (company, If applicable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner0applicant 0contract purchaserand that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. Well authorize Q. Grady Minor &,associates, P.A. and Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. 'Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the core. pres. or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member" • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the general partner" of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee". • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. U STATE\OF FLO rjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that * true. Signature l Date V 1 � T� foregoing instrument was acknowleged before me by means of hysical presence or []online notarization this J - - day of M.arc1 20 23 , by (printed name of owner or qualifier) David J. Stevens as President rAre erson(s) Notary Public must check applicable box: personally known to me ❑ Has produced a current drivers license ❑ Has produced as identification. I Notary Signature: L6 1� Notary Seal .day►u",. STEPHANIEHOLLYLITTLE Notary Public • State of Florida �a Commission N HH 019619 My Comm. Expires Jul 9, 2024 Sonded through National Notary Assn. CP\08-COA-00115\155 REV 3/4/2020 co ver County Growth Management Community Development Department ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following and upload via the CityView Portal with your submittal. Items marked with (*) are required for every application, other items are optional and may not apply to every project. Forms are valid for 6 months following their submittal; an updated form will be required for a new submittal after that timeframe and any time the properties within the project boundary are modified. Additional documents may be attached to this form and can include: - * LOCATION MAP and/or SURVEY showing the proposed project boundary. - List of additional folio numbers and associated legal descriptions. - E-mail from Addressing Official for any pre -approved project and/or street names. LOCATION INFORMATION *FOLIO (Property ID) Number(s) of subject property or properties. [Attach list if necessary] 00200240000and 00202280000 *LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties. [Attach list if necessary] S31/T48/R26 STREET ADDRESS(ES) where applicable, if already assigned. 3375 and 3333 Vanderbilt Beach Road PROJECT INFORMATION Acceptance of this form does not constitute project and/or street name approval and is subject to further review by the Addressing Official. Pre -Approval may be requested by contacting us at GMD_Add ressing@colliercountyfLgov or 239-252-2482 prior to your submittal. *PETITION TYPE (choose from the drop -down list below). A unique checklist must be created for each application. GMPA (Growth Management Plan Amendment Adoption) CURRENT PROJECT NAME N.A. PROPOSED PROJECT NAME 3375 and 3333 VBR Residential Subdistrict PROPOSED STREET NAME(s) N.A. LATEST APPROVED PROJECT NUMBER [e.g., SDP-94-##, PPL-2002-AR-####, PL2017000####] Addressing Checklist (Rev 9/2022) Page 1 of 1 Operations & Regulatory Management Division • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 • 239-252-2400 www. col I ie rcou ntyfl.gov Collier County Property Appraiser Property Aerial Site 3375 Site Zone Parcel No 00200240000 Address VANDERBILT Site City NAPLES *Note 34109 *Disclaimer BEACH RD Open GIS in a New Window with More Features. Collier County Property Appraiser Property Aerial Site 3333 Site Zone Parcel No 00202280000 Address VANDERBILT Site City NAPLES *Note 34109 *Disclaimer BEACH RD f5 .Yy 3:i �'^ R'T4rt7 w];Idc: L*:i UL` :iRJ ........... n � � +5 ° 1 Open GIS in a New Window with More Features. Co [ier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colllercountyfl ¢ov (239) 252-2400 Pre -Application Meeting Notes t;MOri-OLZozz�2G/o Petition Type: Rezone to PUD (PUDZ)(CyMp,,,,;o.,,� Dateand Time: Thursday 3/3/22 3:30pm Assigned Planner: ` TF/ICI7eL yq,+-S� n.i Engineering Manager (for PPL's and FP's): Information Project Name: 202280000 & 200240000 (PUDZ) PL#: PL20220001-ii lD/d LUUL4V VVV PropertylD#: 202280000 Current Zoning: Agricultural (A) 3333 Vanderbilt Beach Rd Project Address: 3375 V B Rd. City: Naples State: FL Zip: 34109 Applicant: Sharon Umpenhour- Grady Minor Agent Name: Rich' Yovanovich,CYK Law Phone: 239-947-1144 Agent/Firm Address: 3800 Via del Re Bonita Springs, FL 34134 Y City: State: _ Zip: Basil Properties Inc - 3333 VBR Property Owner: SBP Stable LLC - 3375 VBR Please provide the following, if applicable: i. Total Acreage: 5.84 ii. Proposed # of Residential Units: III. Proposed Commercial Square Footage: iv. For Amendments, indicate the original petition number: V. If there is an Ordinance or Resolution associated with this project, please indicate the type and number: vi. If the project is within a Plat, provide the name and AR#/PL#: Updated 1/12/2021 Page I 1 of 5 Collier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 wwwr.colliercountyfl.eov (239) 252-24Do Meeting Notes As of 10/16/2017 all Zoning applications have revised applications, and your associated Application is included in your notes; additionally a *new Property Ownership Disclosure Form is required for all applications. A copy of this new form is included in your pre-app Note —link is htti)s://www.colliercountvn.aov/Home/ShowDocument?id=75093 Gk4.04 A/DT-S jiwo /lreahe robe /{77nchr7/ If Site is within the City of Naples Water service Area please send to Naples Utilities and Planning Departments. Then, if the petition is submitted, we are to send it (by email) to the four persons below in their Utilities and Planning Depts. - along with a request that they send us a letter or email of "no objection" to the petition. Bob Middleton RMiddletonanaolesnov.com Allyson Holland AMHollando�n nlesaov m Robin Singer RSinaerCalnaplesaov.com Erica Martin emar0nfa]naolesoov corn Disclaimer. Information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required data. Updated 1/12/2021 Page 1 2 of 5 ThomasClarkeVEN From: Hansen Rachel Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2022 9:42 AM To: ThomasClarkeVEN Cc: FinnTimothy Subject: PL20220001010 - 3375 and 3333 VBR (GMPA) Pob Z Hi Tom, Below are my pre-app notes for PL20220001010- 3375 and 3333 VBR (GMPA). • List and address Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.6 and Policies 7.1-7.4 as applicable. • List and address applicable provisions of Florida Statues 163.3187 and 163.3177 for amending the Growth Management Plan (GMP), including 163.3177(f): "All mandatory and optional elements of the comprehensive plan and plan amendments shall be based upon relevant and appropriate data and an analysis by the local government that may include, but not be limited to, surveys, studies, community goals and vision, and other data available at the time of adoption of the comprehensive plan or plan amendment" • Provide a needs analysis demonstrating the demand for the proposed use at this location, as well as the appropriateness of the subject site. The needs analysis should address the requested density increase as well as the proposed affordable housing income thresholds and justification for the proposed breakdown of income thresholds. Please include narrative justification for the market area utilized. • GMPA requires a Neighborhood Informational Meeting (NIM) which can be combined with the rezone NIM. Rachel Hansen Senior Planner Planning & Zoning Division Rachel. HansenC&.colliercountvR. aov 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1442 76T County "Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at httos,//aoo of/eX!vaT." Information contained in this email is subject to verification by the Zoning Manager and/or Planning Director; if this information is being used as a basis for the purchase/lease of a property or as a guide for the design of a project, it is recommended that a Zoning Verification Letter or Zoning Certificate Application is submitted to zoning services. Applications for a Zoning Verification Letter can be found here: httos:/Iw w.colliercountvfl.gov/home/showdocument?id=69624 Zoning Certificate applications can be found here: httos//wcoll'erc tvfigov/your-aovernme t/d"s'ons-f-r/ooerato s- re¢ulatorv-management/zonina-or-land-use-application/zoningrother-land-use-applications Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Collier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliercountvfl.aov (239) 252-2400 Meeting Notes 6MP4 APP4Gn710jv Fo2„n IS /dW*oh�d. 2r Crew TiriwS gu.nt .Sk6m,%5ln, AZ Lu .l A`[ r. ,c_ Other required documentation for submittal (not listed on application): Disclaimer: Information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required data. Updated 1/12/2021 Page 1 3 of 5 Collier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliercountyfl.gov, (239) 252-24DO Pre -Application Meeting Sign -In Sheet PLp 20220001011 { ]ryz'6o1 ol0 Collier County Contact Information: Name Review Discipline Phone Email ❑ MaggieAcevedo North Collier Fire 252-2309 macevedo@northcollierfire.com ❑ Steve Baluch Transportation Planning 252-2361 stephen.baluch@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Shar A.Seddow MSM/Deputy Fire Marshal - Greater Naples Fire 241-1422 sbeddow@gnfire.org CY Ra Bellows Zoning, PlanningManager 252-2463 ra mond.bellows@colliercoun fl. ov Laurie Beard PUD Monitoring 252-5782 laurie.beard@colliercountyFl.gov [;'�Cralg Brown Environmental Specialist 252-2548 cmig.brown@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Beidi Ashton Cicko I Managing Asst. County Attorney 252-8773 heidi.ashton@colliercountyfl.gov Thomas Clarke Zoning O erations Analyst 252-2584 thomas.clarke@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jamie Cook Development Review Director 252-6290 Jaime.cook@colliercountVfl.gov ❑ Gabriela Castro Zoning Principal Planner 252-4211 gabriela.castro@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Maggie DeMeo North Collier Fire 252-2308 demeo@nonhcollierriire.com ❑ EncY2Y; P-E. Utility Planning 252-1037 Tim Finn, AICP Zoning Principal Planner 252-4312 timothy.finn@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Sue Faulkner GMP - Comprehensive Planning 252-5715 sue.faulkner@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Michael Gibbons Structural/Residential Plan Review 252-2426 michael. ibbons@collierco ntyfl.gov ❑ Storm Gewirtz, P.E. Engineering Stormwater 252-2434 1 storm.gewirtz@colliercountyff.gov Cormac Giblin, AICP Development Review -Planning Manager 252-5095 Cormac.giblin@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ an Gundlach, AICP ZoningPrincipal Planner 252-2484 nanc . undlach@colliercoun I. ov Rachel Hansen GMP—Comprehensive Planning 252-1142 Rachel. ha nsen@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Richard Henderlong Zoning Principal Planner 252-2464 richard.henderlon @colliercoun I. ov ❑ John Houldsworth EnRineering Subdivision 252-5757 john.houldsworth@colliercountvfl.gov ❑ Alicia Humphries Right -Of -Way Permitting 2524326 alicia.humphries@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Anita Jenkins Planning & Zoning Director 252-5095 Anita.jenkins@colliercountVfl.gov ❑ ohn Kell Zoning Senior Planner 252-5719 john.kelly@colliercountyfl.gov Parker Klo f GMP—Comprehensive Planning 252-2471 Parker.kiopf@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Troy Komarowski North Collier Fire 252-2521 tkomarowski@nonhcollierfire.com ❑ Sean Lintz North Collier Fire 597-9227 slintz@northcollierfire.com ❑ Diane L nch Operations Analyst 252-8243 diane.l nch@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Thomas Mastroberto Greater Naples Fire 252-7348 thomas.mastrobeno@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jack McKenna, P.E. I Engineering Services 252-29111 'ack.mckenna@colliercountyR.gov Updated 1/12/2021 Page 1 4 of 5 Coilier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliercountvfl.aov (239) 252-2400 IQ ❑ Matt McLean, P.E. Division Director- IF, CPP & PM 252-8279 matthew.mclean@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ ichele Moscz, AICP Capital Project Planning 252-2466 michele.mosca@colliercountyfl.gov Richard Orth Stormwater Planning 252-5092 richard.orth@colliercountyfl.gov Eric Ortman Zoning Principal Planner 252-1032 Eric.Onman@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Derek Perry Assistant County Attorney 252-8066 Derek.perrv@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Brand! Pollard Utility Impact fees 252-6237 brandi.pollard@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Todd Riggall North Collier Fire 597-9227 triggall@northcollierfire.com ❑ Brett Rosenblum, P.E. Development Review Principal Project Manager 252-2905 brett.rosenblum@colliercountVfl.gov EKJames Sabo, AICP GMP, Comp Planning Manager 252-2708 james.sabo@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Michael Sawyer Transportation Planning 252-2926 michael.sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Corby Schmidt, AICP Comprehensive Planning 252-2944 corby.schmidt@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Linda Simmons North Collier Fire 252-2311 Linda.Simmons@colliercountyB.gov ❑ Peter Shawinsky Architectural Review 252-8523 peter.shawinsky@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Mark Templeton Landscape Review 252-2475 mark.templeton@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Connie Thomas Client Services Supervisor 252-6369 Consuela.thomas@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jessica Velasco Client Services 252-2584 jessica.velasco@colliercountyfl.gov ElJon Walsh, P.E. Building Review 252-2962 jonathan.walsh@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Kirsten Wilkie Environmental Review Manager 252-5518 khirstenn.w.ilkiie@collie@rcouln I. ov ❑ Willoughby Develo mentReiew-Zonin 252-5748 crtielouChrsne ov 1 liercoun Daniel Zunzune ui North Collier Fire 252-2310 1 Daniel.Zunzunegui@colliercountyfl.gov M I!UAT&Ji4zt'v dn+cro.- Additional Attendee Contact Information: Name Representing Phone Email 9h uM QEi ivo � N- 0- 9 7—n4 i4 cRe M4 �iiW xo µ, v ,ec. GA 4(/ W C k LAB f9JeW Sia..t ..a r Updated 1/12/2021 Page 1 5 of 5 may Coi[ier County Applic plans or conceptual netts lsendsfte plans orronceptual plans for review in advance if desired. Growth Management Department Zoning Division /pl0 f?9tdet {iarr�Sa,� PL2022000IG44 — 202280000 & 200240000 Planner: Xilw Finn Assigned Ops Staff: Thomas Clarke STAFF FORM FOR SUPPLEMENTAL PRE -APPLICATION MEETING INFORMATION • Name and Number of who submitted pre-app request Sharon Umpenhour, 239.947.1144 • Agent to list for PL# D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Rich Yovanovich, CYK Law • Owner of property (all owners for all parcels) Parcel No. 00202280000, 3333 VBR— Basil Properties Inc. Parcel No. 00200240000, 3375 VBR—SBP Stable LLC • Confirm Purpose of Pre-App: (Rezone, etc.) PUD Rezone (PUDZ) to allow a multi -family rental apartment complex with a maximum of 150 units. 9uwn CorrRo,won 6rv0A C5M6gG Scwz 5 • Please list the density request of the project if applicable and number of homes/units/offices/docks (any that apply): 150 Units • Details about Project: Rezone from the A Zoning District to a PUD to allow 150 Multi -Family Rental Apts Arv4 420MP4w1a 4r PrF . REQUIRED Supplemental Information provided by: Name: Sharon Umpenhour Title: Senior Planning Technician Email: sumpenhour@gradyminor.com Phone: 239.947.1144 Cancellation/Reschedule Requests: Contact Connie Thomas -Client Services Supervisor Consuela.Thomas@mlliercountvfl.eov Phone: 239-252-2473 Created April 5, 2017 Location: G:\CDES Planning Services\Current\Zoning Staff Information Zo*V Diiisim• 2830 Nah Horseshoe Drive- Naples, FbWa 34104.239-252-2400-w ..spiogarmt RESOLUTION 12-234 A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING GENERAL REQUIREMENTS AND PROCEDURES FOR AMENDING THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN. WHEREAS, Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, requires local governments to prepare and adopt a Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners adopted the Collier County Growth Management Plan on January 10, 1989; and WHEREAS, the Community Planning Act of 2011 (Section 163.3161, et seq., Florida Statutes) mandates certain procedures to amend adopted Growth Management Plans (Section 163.3184 and Section 163.3187, Florida Statutes); and WHEREAS, in order to provide adequate notice, it is necessary to set forth the requirements and procedures to be followed by petitioners, the general public and Collier County in processing amendments to the Collier County Growth Management Plan consistent with the requirements of the Florida Statutes. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: I. Subject to prior Board approval, staff will implement three amendment cycles during which applications for amendments to the Collier County Growth Management Plan or one of its elements ("GMP") will be processed. Additional GMP amendment cycles can only be implemented by approval of the Board. Such approval shall be by majority vote. 2. All amendments must strictly conform with the Florida Growth Management Act, including, but not limited to, Section 163.3194, Florida Statutes, for amendments in general, and Section 163.3187, Florida Statutes, for adoption of a small-scale comprehensive plan amendments. 3. An amendment may be proposed by the Board of County Commissioners, the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC), any department or agency of the County, or any private person, provided, however, that no such person shall propose an to amendment for a land use designation change for property which he or she does not own, except as an agent or attorney for the owner. 4. All required copies of the application to amend the Collier County Growth Management Plan and supporting documentation along with the required filing fee must be submitted to the County Manager or his designee prior to the deadline established by the Board for each adoption cycle. Following the requisite submission: A. Prior to submittal, a pre -application conference shall occur between the petitioner and appropriate County staff to ensure that the amendment procedure is understood and adhered to. B. Staff shall perform an initial review of the proposed amendment application to determine whether additional information is necessary to enable staff to conduct a formal review and whether other amendments of the Growth Management Plan will be necessary to preserve the internal consistency of the Plan. Within 30 calendar days following the filing deadline, the staff shall notify the petitioner in writing, that: (i) staff has determined that the petition is adequate for formal review; or (ii) the application is inadequate for formal review and the notice shall set forth in detail the additional information deemed necessary for formal review of the petition. C. If the application is deemed insufficient, the petitioner shall have 30 calendar days from the date of receipt of staffs letter of insufficiency to supplement the application in response to the initial review. A second 30 day time period to respond to the insufficiency may be requested by the petitioner. D. County staff shall review the application and may consult with other County Departments or agencies as it deems necessary to evaluate the proposed amendment and shall prepare a report with a recommendation. E. The Public Hearings schedule and State Agency review time frames will be those as established by Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes, "Process for adoption of comprehensive plan or plan amendment.", or Section 163.3187, Florida Statute, "Process for adoption of small-scale comprehensive plan amendment," as amended from time -to - time. Adoption of an amendment to the Growth Management Plan must be by Ordinance and shall require four affirmative votes of the Board of County Commissioners. 5. This Resolution supersedes and repeals Resolution 97-431, as amended by Resolution 98.18, relating to prior Growth Management Plan Amendment procedures. THIS RESOLUTION ADOPTED after motion, second and majority vote favoring same, this 13th day of November, 2012. ATTEST: . DWIG��HTT,,E::1 ROCK CLERK 11!trit K t0 d1901W*484,,,,4u er to form and legal sufficiency: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: FRED W. COYL , CHAIRD 12 Neighborhood Information Meeting AfFdavit of Compliance I hereby certify that pursuant to Ordinance 2004-41, of the Collier County Land Development Code, I did cause the attached newspaper advertisement to appear and I did give notice by mail to the Following property owners and/or condominium and civic associations whose members may be affected by the proposed land use changes of an application request For a rezoning, PUD amendment, or conditional use, at least IS days prior [o the scheduled Neighborhood Information Meeting. For the purposes of this requirement, the names and addresses of property owners shadl be deemed those appearing on the latest taz rolls of Collier County and any other persons or entities who have made a formed request of the County to be notified. The said notice contained the laymen's description of the site property of proposed change and the date, time, and place of a Neighborhood InFormation Meeting. Per the attached letters, property owner's list, and copy of newspaper advertisement which are hereby made a part of this Affidavit of Compliance STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by means of 0 Physical presence or Qonline registration this 5 day of May 2p 23 by Sharon Umpanhour who is Q✓ personally known to me or Qhas produced as identification. "_ __ CARIN J.pWYER SlgnatprC+Of NOtH Public -` � � " MV COMMISSION # GG 18236] i>'� E%PIRES: May 1�. 202� Cafln J. DWyer "'=�!''�' mneee mm Noar]P.encomelwnlers Print Name of Notary Public GradyMinor Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors * Planners • Landscape Architects NOTICE OF NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING PETITIONS: PL20220001010 — Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict; and PL20220001011— Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Planned Unit Development In compliance with the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) requirements, a neighborhood Information meeting (NIM) hosted by D. Wayne Arnold, AICP, of Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. (GradyMinor) and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq., of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A., representing 3333/3375 VBR LLC (Applicant) will be held May 24, 2023, 5:30 pm at the Collier County Headquarters Library, Sugden Theater (2385 Orange Blossom Dr., Naples, FL 34109). 3333/3375 VBR LLC has submitted formal applications to Collier County, seeking approval of a Small -Scale Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) establishing the Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict and a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) Rezone from the A, Agricultural Zoning District to Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD to allow a maximum of 150 residential dwelling units with a percentage required to be designated for affordable housing. The subject property is comprised of 5.88± acres and is located at 3375 and 3333 Vanderbilt Beach Road in Section 31, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. Z R'E SUBJECT PROPERTY L7 Z 0 z J [J7 Z d Z H i � J ¢ VANDERBILT BEACH RD Ln PROJECT INFORMATION GRADYMINOR.COM/PLANNING Project Location Map If you have questions, please contact Sharon Umpenhour with GradyMinor by email: sumpenhour@gradyminor.com or phone: 239-947-1144. For project information or to register to participate remotely* go to, gradyminor.com/Planning. Any information provided is subject to change until final approval by the governing authority. The NIM is an informational meeting, not a public hearing. *Remote participation is provided as a courtesy and is at the user's risk. The applicant and GradyMinor are not responsible for technical issues. The Collier County Public Library does not sponsor or endorse this program. Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. Ph. 239-947-1144 • Fax. 239-947-0375 3800 Via Del Rey EB 0005151 • LB 0005151 • LC 26000266 Bonita Springs, FL 34134 www.gradyminor.com Notice: This data belongs to the Collier County Property Appraiser's Office (CC PA). Therefore, the recipient agrees not to represent this data to anyone as other than CCPA provided data. The recipient may not transfer this data to others without consent from the CCPA. Petition: PL20220001011 & PL20220001010 I Buffer: 500' 1 Date: 3131/23 1 Site Location: 00200240000 & Others A i NAME1 NAME2 � NAME3 NAME4 NAMES NAME6 3333/3375 VBR LLC 3838 TAMIAMI TR N STE #402 NAPLES, FL 34103--3586 31 4826 COMM AT SW CNR SEC 3333/3375 VBR LLC 3838 TAMIAMI TRAIL N #402 NAPLES, FL 34103--0 31 4826 El/2 OF W1/2 OF E1/2 BRADFORD SQUARE RETIREMENT COMMUNITY LLC 7101 S 82ND ST LINCOLN, NE 68516--0 31 4826 S1/2 OF SWIM OF SW BURGO, SANDRA L 1131 BROOKSHIRE DR NEW CASTLE, PA 16101--0 MARSALA AT TIBURON LOT 34 DINING, JOHN M & SUSAN R 14455 MARSALA WAY NAPLES, FL 34109--3233 MARSALA AT TIBURON LOT 41 HAPPY MONEY TRUST 14435 MARSALA WAY NAPLES, FL 34109--0 MARSALA AT TIBURON LOT 36 MARSALA AT TIBURON HOMEOWNERS ASSN INC C/O BUS MGMT SERV OF THE GULFCOAST PO BOX 10189 NAPLES, FL 34101-0 MARSALA AT TIBURON TRACT A PAUL D MORTELL TRUST JANE H MORTELL TRUST 14451 MARSALA WAY NAPLES, FL 34109--0 MARSALA AT TIBURON LOT 40 PR NAPLES ACTIVE ADULT LLC C/O PGIM REAL ESTATE 7GIRALDA FARMS MADISON, NJ 07940-0 314826 W1/2 OF S1/2 OF SANDWITH TR, JEFFREY S PERPETUAL ASSET SHIELD TRUST 205 BETSY LN RICHMOND, KY 40475--8555 MARSALA AT TIBURON LOT 35 SOUTH WAVERLEY FLORIDA LTD 14447 MARSALA WAY NAPLES, FL 34109--0 MARSALA AT TIBURON LOT 39 TGM BERMUDA ISLAND INC 1 N LASALLE ST #2100 CHICAGO, IL 60602-- 3918 06 49 26 COM NW CNR VILLAGE TI BURON GOLF VENTURES L P % RYAN LLC PO BOX 4900 SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85261-0 31 4826 SW7/4 OF NW114, TI ITF /ST OF FL 3900 COMMONWEALTH BLVD TALLAHASSEE, FL 32399--3000 31 4826 PAR 68I-75 RAN TURNER, DAVID P & RACHELLE L 14439 MARSALA WAY NAPLES, FL 34109--0 MARSALA AT TIBURON LOT 37 VILLAGE WALK HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION OF NAPLES INC 3200 VILLAGE WALK CIR STE 100 NAPLES, FL 34109-1316 VILLAGE WALK PHASE ONE VILLAGE WALK HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION OF NAPLES INC 3200 VILLAGE WALK CIR STE 100 NAPLES, FL 34109-1316 VILLAGE WALK PHASE ONE VILLAGE WALK HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION OF NAPLES INC 3200 VILLAGE WALK CIR STE 100 NAPLES, FL 34109-1316 VILLAGE WALK PHASE ONE WOZNIAK, GLENN G & MEI N 14443 MARSALA WAY NAPLES, FL 34109-0 MARSALA AT TIBURON LOT 38 OLIO ADDRESSTYPE ,S89DEG E 991.18FT, NO2DEG W 150.12FT TO POE, NO2DEG W 517. 35FT, S89DEG E 330.09FT, S02 00200240000 U OF S1/2 OF SW1/4 OF SW1/4, LESS S 150FT 00202280000U 114 LESS S 15OFT LESS E 495FT +-LESS R W DESC IN OR 3022 PG 1128& LESS RW DESC IN OR 3599 00203042108 U 59810000788 U 59810000924 U 59810000827 U 59810000021 U 59810000908 U SE1/4 OF SW1/4, LESS S 15OFT R/W 00201000003 U 59810000801 U 59810000885 U WALK PH ONE, S 7DEG 11'31-W 403.11FT,S4'1-W380FT,THENCE 408.41FT ALONG ARC OF CURVE 00282520007U NW7/4 OF SE1/4 OF NW1/4, N7/2 OF SW7/4 OF SW1/4, NW7/4 OF SW1/4, N1/2 OF 00199320002U 00202520003 U 59810000843 U TRACT A (RAN) 80400000109 U TRACT B (LAKE/DE), LESS THAT PORTION DESC IN OR 2300 PG 2542 80400000358 U TRACT D (COMMON AREA)LESS OR 3526 PG 3836 80400000950 U 59810000869 U POList_500.x1s ��x�t�s ��xit� ��.u� PART OL THE USA TODAY NETWORK Publlsbad Dolly Naples, FL 34 t t O O GRAOY MINOR ASSOCIATES PA 3800 VIA DEL REV BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34t34 ATTN Argmat ar Pabmamn STATE OF WISCONSIN COUNTY OF BROWN 9afor6 ih¢ untlersignetl they s s [b¢ autbobty, personally appeared who 0 oath says [hat they a s legal dor0. oT the Naples Daily News, a daily wspapar published at Nagaz. In Colllar County. Florida: tliatnbuted In Cdlicr and Lae countless of Fbrida; [ha[ the attached coq of !ba ativartising was publlshetl In said wspapar on tlato 4stM. Amato further ¢ays Ihat the saltl Naples Daly N¢wa Is a ¢wspapar pudlabatl at Naples, in said Colllar County. Fbritla, antl [M1at the said wapap¢r has b¢r¢toTore been contlnucusly pub6sbetl said Colllar Cov�ly, FIgWa: tllsWbulad In Coll{er ant Laa c unties of Fbrida, oath tlay and ha¢ bean amaratl and rises mail maHer at tb¢ post omc¢ In Naples. in said Colter County, Florida for a period of one year neM precetling lbe flral pubecetlon of IM1a atleched copy or advertisemerH and amarH ruHher says mae he has nel[ber paitl n r promisatl any per¢on, or corpom[ion any dlacounL orebata, c misalon o raNntl Ior Ue purpose of securing thlz advartlsemaM for pvbllw[lon In Hr¢ aelO newspaper. 6/6/3023 Subactlbetl end sworn [o before on May Stb, 2023 /J Notary. State o'�M, County of Hrown My commission oxpires: , _ ^, -� KATH LEEN AL( -EN PUBLICATION COST: $1,00R.00 NOEarY Public AD NO: GCI'105509'I CUSTOMER NO: 53i419 Stateof Wlsoonsln POit: VBRRZ-22 NIM AD (May 5 2023 Posting) AD SIZE: OIS PLAY AD W MAP 3X10 RECE�VEp MAY ! 2 ppP3 &�s �a[as,jpq- NOTICE OF NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING PETITIONS: PL20220001010 - Mattson at Vantlarbilt Resitl¢ntial Subdistrict, and PL202200D1011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Planned Unit Development In compliance with the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) requirements, a neighborhood Information meeting (NIM) hosted by D. Wayne Arnold. AICP, of O. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. (GradyMinor) and Richard D. Yovanovlch, Esq., of Coleman, Yovanovich ffi Koester, P.A., raprosanting 3333/33]5 VBR LLC (Applicant) will ba haltl Mey 24, 2023, 5:30 pm at the Collier County Headquarters Library, Sugdan Theater (2385 Orange Blossom Dc, Naples, FL 3411yd). 3333/33]6 VBR LLC has submitted formal applications to Collier County, seeking approval of a Small -Scala Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) establishing the Mattson at Vendarblit Rasitlantlal SubdisVict and a Rasidanfial Planned Unit Development (RPU D) Razona from the A, Agrlculturel Zoning District to the Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD to allow a maximum of 160 residential dwelling uniW with a percentage raquiretl to ba designated for affordable housing. Tha subject property Is comprised of 5.88z acres and is located ak 33]6 and 3333 Vanderbilt Beach Road in Section 3t, Township 48 South, Ranges 26 East, Collier County, Florida. SYBJIGT PROPIRTY If you have questions, please contact Sharon Vmpanhour with GradyMinor by email: sumpenhour®gradymino¢com or phone: 239-94]-1144. For project information or Yo register to participate remotely' go to, gradyminorcoM Planning. Any information provided is subject [o change until final approval by the governing authority. Tha Naighborhootl information Meeting is for informational purposes, it is not a public hearing. 'Remote particlpaf/on is provided as a courtesy and is at the usar5 rtslt. The appt/cant and GradyMinor era not responsible for tachnlca/ issues. Tha Co/tla� Gopnty Pub/ic Library ,Moos not sponsor or• endorse this program. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING PETITIONS: PL20220001010 — MATiSON AT VANOERB/LT RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT; AND PL20220001011 — MATTSON AT VANDERBI LT RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT May 24, 2023 PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY """'Please be ad./4scd'"•"' The Information on this sheet is to wntact you regartling this pro)ecf antl future public meetings. Untler Floritla law, e-mall addresses, phone n tubers and certain home atldress¢s ar¢ public retards onc¢ received by a government agency. If you do not want your a -mail address, phone number or home address released if the county receives a public recortls request, you can refrain from including such Information on this sheet. You have the option of checking with the county staff on your own ip obtain uptlafes on fM1e project as well as checking the county web site for additional information. NAME: i�t�.._1 1 �/. _.t ��.! --tt�T ��77 TJ�rS (l,Ci`f EMAIL:��Q�.! N..J4/C�L1�'C� �,1/t^'{_� i ADDRESS: PHONE: NAME: EMAtL• ADDRESS: PHONE: NAME: EMAIL: ADDRESS: PHONE: NAME: EMNL• ADDRESS: PHONE: NAME: EMAIL: ADDRESS: PHONE: NAME: EMAIL: ADDRESS: PHONE: NAME: EMAIL: ADDRESS: PHONE: NAME: EMAIL: ADDRESS: PHONE: NAME: EMAIL: ADDRESS: PHONE: NIM Sign -in Sheet 5/24/2023 Zoom Registration - May 24, 2023 NIM PL20220001010 and PL20220001011 First Name Last Name Bobby Ruiz Robert Campbell Mary Waller Email bruiz@tgmcommunities.com rampbell@tgmcommunities.com mew4naples@aol.com PL20220001010 — MATTSON AT VANDERBILT RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT; AND PL20220001011— MATTSON AT VANDERBILT RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT May 24, 2023, NIM Transcript Sharon Umpenhour: 00:01 Okay, we're recording. Wayne Arnold: 00:01 All right. Wayne Arnold: 00:03 Well good evening everybody. I'm Wayne Arnold with GradyMinor & Associates and we're here tonight to talk about two applications that are pending with Collier County Government. We don't have any audience attendees other than staff and the development team, but we do have a couple of folks on Zoom. So I hope you all can hear us fine and can see the video. I'll make some project introductions, but we're here for a project that is located just east of the intersection of Livingston Road and on the north side of Vanderbilt Beach Road. It's about 5.8 acres and it's currently the home of a pet resort and a defunct equestrian facility. And we're proposing a conference of plan amendment and a PD rezoning application in order to develop up to 150 multifamily rental dwelling units on the property of which we have proposed 22.6% of those to be affordable units, income restricted. 01:04 So introduce the team. We have Andy Bollig who's here as a development partner with Roers Acquisitions. Rich Yovanovich is our land use counsel. I'm Wayne Arnold. Mike Delate, our civil engineer with GradyMinor & Associates. Jim Bank is our traffic engineer and we have a biologist who's not in attendance, but Marco Espinar did the environmental assessment for the site. 01:27 The project is highlighted here on the screen in yellow and you can see the existing structures. Those are all set to be raised assuming this project is approved. And again, the property's about 5.8 acres and located just east of Livingston Road. To our west is a project called Bradford Square, which is a age restricted senior housing project and to the east of us, is a project called Sandalwood Village, which also is an age restricted independent living facility. And to our north is the Tiburon Golf Club. 02:04 This is a project information sheet that lets you know that we are modifying the future land use map. We're creating a new subdistrict to establish the property to be allowed to have 150 multi -family rental units on that. And again, we're proposing that 22.6% of those would be income restricted homes. Page 1 of 4 PL20220001010 — MATTSON AT VANDERBILT RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT; AND PL20220001011— MATTSON AT VANDERBILT RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT May 24, 2023, NIM Transcript Sharon Umpenhour: 02:27 Just a correction on that Future land use designation, the proposed, it's incorrect. Wayne Arnold: 02:33 Okay. We are proposing the new subdistrict and it'll be the Matson Vanderbilt Beach Road, subdistrict. We have to create a series of maps for the county as part of our small scale plan amendment. And this is a map that identifies the location for the mixed use subdistrict that will be for the subject property. Again, this is another series of maps with some of our sub- district language, and here it highlights, in paragraph C, the total units that are constructed, 22.6% of those would be income restricted, half of that number at the 80% or less and the others up to 100%. 03:18 Here's a conceptual master plan that we developed for the zoning application that identifies a central access point on Vanderbilt Beach Road, and then it's an 'H" shaped building with an interior courtyard amenity area with parking surrounding the building, some of which will probably have carport covered structures on it. This is a color version, just adds a little more clarity to where the green space, buffers, water management and the amenity areas will be located. 03:51 We propose to enhance the buffer adjacent to the Tiburon Golf Club with a series of clustered sable palm trees. Similar to what was prepared for the Sable, or excuse me, the Sandalwood Village project to our east. We have to propose development standards for the project highlighted here. Maximum building height. We establish a zone height of 50 feet and we're proposing an actual height that the maximum building height for any part of the structure would be 60 feet. 04:22 These are some images from other Roers projects. The building that's shown there is not a four-story building, but we're proposing in the 50-foot zone height to have a four-story apartment building. But you can see the quality of the finish that Roers intends to provide here with some of their outdoor amenity areas and just the architectural details. 04:45 So in the process we're required to hold a neighborhood informational meeting, which we're conducting tonight. Our next step will be to go to the Collier County Planning Commission, which we do not have a hearing date established yet. Separate mail notices will be provided to surrounding property owners once that date is established. And then after the planning commission, they will make a recommendation to Page 2 of 4 PL20220001010 — MATTSON AT VANDERBILT RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT; AND PL20220001011— MATTSON AT VANDERBILT RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT May 24, 2023, NIM Transcript the Board of County Commissioners. And that meeting has not yet been set, but those are our next steps and the County Commission will hold one final hearing and make a decision to approve, approve with conditions, or deny the application. 05:19 This is an informational sheet. Sharon Umpenhour, who's in charge of our audio system here tonight, is also our contact in our office for any of the information. So we upload on our website this presentation as well as other project information that is submitted to Collier County for the project and we continue to update it as we provide any updates to Collier County staff. So we will continue on through what's known as our Sufficiency Process until we get to our first planning commission hearing. And again, signs will be posted on the site when that hearing's established as well as mail notice is going out to surround the property members. 05:56 So that's our quick presentation. I'm happy to take any questions you may have from those attendees on Zoom. If you'd unmute if you have a question, that would be great. Robert Campbell: 06:11 The only question I have... Hello. My name's Robert Campbell. I'm with TGM Communities. We actually own TG and Bermuda Island directly across the Vanderbilt Road from the proposed site. I just had a question. Did you say that the document that you're sharing now will be uploaded onto the gradyminor.com planning website? Sharon Umpenhour: 06:35 It's already there. Wayne Arnold: 06:35 Yes, sir. It's there now. It'll be shared - Robert Campbell: 06:36 Oh, this version is already there, correct? Wayne Arnold: 06:37 It is. We uploaded that late this afternoon. Robert Campbell: 06:39 Okay. Much appreciated. It looks exciting. Wayne Arnold: 06:46 Thank you. Any other comments or questions? I know there's another attendee on the Zoom. Robert Campbell: 06:54 He's actually a colleague of mine. Wayne Arnold: 06:55 Oh, okay. Great. Sharon Umpenhour: 06:56 Mr. Ruiz, is that your colleague? Page 3 of 4 PL20220001010 — MATTSON AT VANDERBILT RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT; AND PL20220001011— MATTSON AT VANDERBILT RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT May 24, 2023, NIM Transcript Robert Campbell: 06:59 It is, correct. Wayne Arnold: 07:01 Okay. Sharon Umpenhour: 07:01 Oh, okay. Thank you. Wayne Arnold: 07:01 Great. Well, we're happy to answer any questions you may have as we go through the process or if you all think of anything else, we're glad to get information to you. We appreciate you. Robert Campbell: 07:10 No, I think everything looks great. I appreciate the presentation. Looking forward to seeing how it all plays out. Wayne Arnold: 07:17 Okay, well great. Thank you so much. Well, with that, I guess we'll adjourn. Thanks for participating and look forward to hearing from you. Thanks. Robert Campbell: 07:24 All right, have a great day. Robert Ruiz: 07:26 Thank you all. Page 4 of 4 May 24, 2023, Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) GradyMinor Project information and a copy of this presentation can be found on our website: GRADYMINOR.COM/PLANNING/ PROJECT TEAM: • 3333/3375 VBR, LLC - Applicant • Andy Bollig, Development Partner - Roers Acquisitions LLC • Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq., Land Use Attorney - Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. • D. Wayne Arnold, AICP, Professional Planner - Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. • Michael Delate, P.E., Civil Engineer - Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. • James M. Banks, PE, Traffic Engineer - JMB Transportation Engineering, Inc. • Marco A. Espinar, Environmental Planning/Biologist - Collier Environmental Consultants, Inc. *Please note, all information provided is subject to change until final approval by the governing authority. [ION MAP h.77. 7 volpAlp- Id tF'S Y sib X. ir qq17' ■ 4'W , i 16 y a M�i2ia� y q0 Y k "Na .- nAmw:. If Legend I -- •:! Lr]Y S0FFaw l FUTURE LAND USE (FLU) DESIGNATION: Existing: Urban Designation, Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict Proposed: Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict ZONING: Existing: A, Agricultural Proposed: Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD PROPOSED REQUEST: • Modify the FLU map to add The Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict • Rezone from the A, Agricultural, Zoning District to the Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential PUD • To allow a maximum of 150 multi -family rental units. 0 0 I #Jrban Designation, Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict M�C . —' .f Vanderbilt Beach RD Village Walk CIR Legend Subject Properly - 5_58+1-Acres - VanderbiR Reach Rd Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict Urban Residential Subdistrict Source: EsH, Maxar,-arthsfar Geographics, and fie GIS User Community Proposed Subdistrict Language: 26. Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict [beginning Page 551 This Subdistrict consists of 5.88+/- acres and is located at 3315 and 3333 Vanderbilt Beach Road. The purpose of the subdistrict is to allow residential development at a maximum of up to 150 dwelling units. Development within the Subdistrict shall be subject to the following: a_ Development shall be in the form of a Planned Unit Development fPUDI. b_ The maximum number of rental units permitted within the Subdistrict is 150 dwelling units. c_ Of the total units constructed, the project shall comply with the following: 113% of the units will be rented to households whose incomes are up to and including 80% of the Area Median Income [AMI] for Collier County and 11.3% of the units will be rented to households whose incomes are up to and including 100% of the AMI for Collier County and the corresponding rent limits. These units will be committed for a period of 30 years from the date of issuance of certificate of occupancy of the first unit. Income and rent limits may be adjusted annually based on combined income and rent limittable published by the Florida Housing Finance Corporation or as otherwise provided by Collier County. ■ x Vanderbilt Beach RD 7D Villaqe Walk CIR Legend Subject Properly - 5_88+V Acres - Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict Vanderbilt Beach Rd Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict Urban Residential Subdistrict Source. Esd, Maxar,=arths-ar Geoaraphics, and the GI S User --cmmu nity ZONED: PELICAN MARSH ❑RIIPUD USE: GOLF COURSE 1 RESIDENTIAL 15' WIDE TYPE '8' LAid�SCAPI=' 8i1FFEf2 Li ofml z �M 4- ZONED: BRADFORD �>I m SQUARE MPUD of POOL USE: ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY >� m RESIDENTIAL Z m1 BUILDING o N m T 15' W IDE TYPE 'D' LANDSCAPE BUFFER f ANDERBILT BEACH ROAD SITF -qI IIIAAAARY TOTAL SITE AREA: 5.88± ACRES RESIDENTIAL- 5.48±ACRES (93%) BUFFERS: 0.40±ACRES (7%) RESIDENTIAL- MAXIMUM 150 MULTI -FAMILY DWELLING UNITS OPEN SPACE- REQUIRED- 3D% PROVIDED: 3D% PRESERVE- REQUIRED- O±ACRES (0 ACRES NATIVE VEGETATION X25%) PROVIDED: D±ACRES TREE PRESERVATION: SCATTERED NATIVE TREES EXIST ON -SITE, 25% WILL BE RETAINED OR REPLANTED CONSISTENT WITH LDC SECTION 3.05.07.A.2. ZONED: THE VANDERBILT TRUST 1989 CFPUD USE: ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY POTENTIAL VEHICU LARIPEDESTRIAN INTERCONNECTION 7 BRAL)FORL) 5UUAKE RETIREMENT COMMUNITY F ' l - ------------. 8 '-POOL. loggia 00mog RESIDEN* IAl_ BU I CD N6 R 15' J -. E vOVERED PAiiKlHry � l 4 LL a 5AN]�ALVVOC.L� VILLAGE a F 4 q 1 \ FOTENTiAL ..! V�H14ULARIF'�pE�TRIAN INTERCONNECTION TYPE P'LANP CAFE BUFFEFZ`� +' VANIDERBILT BEACH RP- ENNANGED TTPF -B BUFFER m '.. •, •i �AKDAW.P "BRADFORD SGtUAiR-- ii :J VILLAGE RETIREMENT Gp-. MJNlt f EN�4ANCEID TYPE 'ES' BLI�:FER ELEVATION VIEW DO LF (TYR) YANDER5ILT 6EAGH RD. -•_ K*m POSED JEVELOPMA.N PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES }2 MULTI-FAI'dILY Minin orn Floo: A -ea per unit 650 SF Minimum Lot Ares N/A Minimum Lc-t %Vidth N/A Minimuum Lc-t Dvpth N/A Minimum Setbacks Front Yard 50 feet PUD Boundary (North, East & West} 100feet Minimum Distance Between Buildings *3 20 feet Maximum Building Height Zoned Actual 50 feet 60 feet ACCESSORY STRUCTURES $2 Minimum Setbacks Front Yard 15 feet PUD Boundary (East & West) * 1 10 feet PUD Boundary (North)*1 15 feet Minimum Distance Between Buildings *3 10 feet Maximum Building Height Zoned Actual 25 feet 30feet SPS — Same as Principal Structure *1— Does not apply to passive recreational uses such as trails/pathways. *2 — Community structures such as guardhouses, gatehouses, fences, walls, columns, decorative architectural features, streetscape, passive parks and access control structures shall have no required internal setback, except as listed below, and are permitted throughout the PUD; however such structures shall be located such that they do not cause vehicular stacking into the road right-of-way or create site distance issues for motorists and pedestrians. *3 — Zero feet if attached Aw- 1 ESG I ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN I MULTI -FAMILY 1 05.23.2023 CONCEPT IMAGERY • File resubmittal • Hearing Notices mailed to adjacent property owners within 500 feet of the subject property. • Hearing sign posted on property advertising hearing dates. • HEARING DATES: • CCPC - TBD, 9:00 a.m., Collier County Government Center, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, 3rd floor BCC Chamber, Naples, FL, 34112 • BCC - TBD, 9:00 a.m., Collier County Government Center, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, 3rd floor BCC Chamber, Naples, FL, 34112 WWW.GRADYMINOR.COM/PLANNING Collier County Growth Management Department (GMD) Public Portal: CVPORTAL.COLLIERCOUNTYFL.GOV/CITYVIEWWeb 10 ■❑ CONTACTS: • Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A.: Sharon Umpenhour, Senior Planning Technician; sumpenhour@gradyminor.com or 239.947.1 144 • Collier County Staff: Timothy Finn; Timothy.Finn@colliercountyfl.gov, 239)252-4312 Katherine Eastley; Katherine. Eastley@colliercountyfl.gov, (239) 252-2834