The URL can be used to link to this page

HEX Agenda 12/14/2023Collier County Hearing Examiner Page 1 Printed 12/6/2023 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Hearing Examiner AGENDA Growth Management Department Conference Rooms 609/610 2800 Horseshoe Drive North Naples, FL 34104 December 14, 2023 9: 00 AM Andrew W. J. Dickman, Esq., AICP Hearing Examiner Note: Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes unless otherwise waived by the Hearing Examiner. Persons Wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the hearing report packets must have that material submitted to County staff at Ailyn.Padron@CollierCountyFL.gov 10 days prior to the Hearing. All materials used during presentation at the hearing will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Hearing Examiner will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto, and therefore may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Decisions of the Hearing Examiner are final unless appealed to the Board of County Commissioners. Hearing Procedures will provide for presentation by the Applicant, presentation by staff, public comment and applicant rebuttal. The Hearing Examiner will render a decision within 30 days. Persons wishing to receive a copy of the decision by mail may supply County staff with their name, address, and a stamped, self-addressed envelope for that purpose. Persons wishing to receive an electronic copy of the decision may supply their email address. December 2023 Collier County Hearing Examiner Page 2 Printed 12/6/2023 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Review of Agenda 3. Advertised Public Hearing A. Petition No. VA-PL20230009299 – 267 3rd Street West - Request for a variance from Land Development Code Section 5.03.06 to reduce the minimum side yard riparian setbacks from 7.5 feet to zero on both side yards for a proposed dock facility within a Residential Single- Family-4 (RSF-4) zoning district. The subject property is located at 267 3rd Street West and is also described as Lot 2, Block G, Little Hickory Shores, Unit 3 Replat subdivision, in Section 5, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (Coordinator: John Kelly, Planner III) (Companion Item #PL20220006082) (Commissioner District 2) B. Petition No. BDE-PL20220006082 – 267 3rd Street West - Request for an 18-foot boat dock extension from the maximum permitted protrusion of 20 feet allowed by Section 5.03.06.E.1 of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) for waterways greater than 100 feet in width, to allow a boat docking facility protruding a total of 38 feet into a waterway that is 125± feet wide, for a proposed dock facility within a Residential Single-Family-4 (RSF-4) zoning district. The subject property is located at 267 3rd Street West, also described as Lot 2, Block G, Little Hickory Shores, Unit 3 Replat subdivision, in Section 5, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (Coordinator: John Kelly, Planner III) (Companion Item #PL20230009299) (Commissioner District 2) C. Petition No. NUA- PL20230012731 – 1114 Palm Drive - Request for an alteration to a nonconforming use pursuant to Land Development Code Section 9.03.03 to allow for the replacement of a mobile home that will satisfy all other dimensional standards for principal structures within the Residential Single-Family-4 (RSF-4) Zoning District, for property located at 1114 Palm Drive in Immokalee, in Section 32, Township 46 South, Range 29 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: John Kelly, Planner III] Commission District 5 D. Petition No. PDI-PL20230011202 - Yarberry Lane and Arbour Walk Circle - Request for an insubstantial change to the Palisades Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD), Ordinance No. 22-20, to modify the cross sections in Exhibit C of the Master Plan, including the depiction of the as-built elevations of 12.5 feet for the wall that runs the length of the perimeter RPUD boundary; and to revise Deviation 1 to reflect the correct elevation of the wall. The subject property consists of ±12.0 acres in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Yarberry Lane and Arbour Walk Circle in Section 2, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. [Eric Ortman, Planner III] Commissioner District 2 E. Petition No. VA PL20220003012 - 2560 39th St. SW - Request for a variance from LDC 5.05.09.G.2 that requires the base of a communications tower to be set back from the property line by a distance of two and one-half times the height of the tower to reduce the setback from the northern property line from 375 feet to 72 feet, a reduction of 303 feet; to reduce the setback from the southern property line from 375 feet to 72 feet, a reduction of 303 feet; and to reduce the setback from the eastern property line from 375 feet to 220.7 feet, a reduction of 154.3 feet on a +/-2.38-acre property located at 2560 39th St SW, also known as Golden Gate Estates Unit 28 North 150 feet of Tract 144, in Section 26, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. [Eric Ortman, Planner III] Commissioner District 3 December 2023 Collier County Hearing Examiner Page 3 Printed 12/6/2023 4. Other Business 5. Public Comments 6. Adjourn 12/14/2023 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Hearing Examiner Item Number: 3.A Doc ID: 27321 Item Summary: Petition No. VA-PL20230009299 – 267 3rd Street West - Request for a variance from Land Development Code Section 5.03.06 to reduce the minimum side yard riparian setbacks from 7.5 feet to zero on both side yards for a proposed dock facility within a Residential Single-Family-4 (RSF-4) zoning district. The subject property is located at 267 3rd Street West and is also described as Lot 2, Block G, Little Hickory Shores , Unit 3 Replat subdivision, in Section 5, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (Coordinator: John Kelly, Planner III) (Companion Item #PL20220006082) (Commissioner District 2) Meeting Date: 12/14/2023 Prepared by: Title: Planner – Zoning Name: John Kelly 11/22/2023 4:55 PM Submitted by: Title: Zoning Director – Zoning Name: Mike Bosi 11/22/2023 4:55 PM Approved By: Review: Growth Management Community Development Department Diane Lynch Department review Skipped 11/28/2023 1:58 PM Hearing Examiner (GMD Approvers) Diane Lynch Review Item Completed 11/28/2023 5:32 PM Operations & Regulatory Management Michael Stark Review Item Completed 11/29/2023 8:12 AM Zoning Ray Bellows Review Item Completed 11/29/2023 1:28 PM Zoning James Sabo Review Item Skipped 11/29/2023 5:16 PM Zoning Mike Bosi Division Director Completed 12/01/2023 4:14 PM Hearing Examiner Andrew Dickman Meeting Pending 12/14/2023 9:00 AM 3.A Packet Pg. 4 VA-PL20230009299; 267 3rd St W – Lot 2 Page 1 of 7 11/27/2023 STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FROM: ZONING DIVISION – ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: DECEMBER 14, 2023 SUBJECT: VA-PL20230009299; 267 3RD STREET WEST – WINGFELDER VARIANCE, COMPANION TO BD-PL20220006082 _____________________________________________________________________________ PROPERTY OWNER/APPLICANT: AGENT: Bradley P. and Sharon A. Wingfelder Nick Pearson 5412 Planter’s Wood Ct. Bayshore Marine Consulting, LLC Mississauga, Ontario 2025 Monroe Ave. Canada L5M5V6 Naples, FL 34112 REQUESTED ACTION: To have the Collier County Hearing Examiner (HEX) consider a variance from Section 5.03.06.E.6 of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) to reduce the minimum side yard riparian setbacks for dock facilities on lots with less than 60 feet of water frontage from 7.5 feet to zero on both sides for a new dock facility with two slips, subject to the approval of a companion Boat Dock Extension petition, for a lot with 30± feet of water frontage. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is located at 267 3rd Street West and is legally described as Lot 2, Block G, Replat of Little Hickory Shores Unit 3, in Section 5, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (See location map on the following page) PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The subject property is a 0.04-acre parcel located within a Residential Single Family-4 (RSF-4) zoning district, commonly referred to as a “boat dock lot.” The parcel is too small to accommodate the minimum square-foot requirement for a building (single-family dwelling) and the setback requirements of the zoning district as was acknowledged by the Board of County Commissioners when they approved a Provisional Use permitting docks without a principal use on property described as: “Lots 1 through 23, Block G, Little Hickory Shores, Unit #3, as recorded in Plat Book 6, Page 2, Official Records of Collier County, Florida.” See Resolution No. 1987-260, (Continued on Page 4) 3.A.a Packet Pg. 5 Attachment: Staff Report VA-PL20230009299 11272023 (27321 : PL20230009299 VA 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder) VA-PL20230009299; 267 3rd St W – Lot 2 Page 2 of 7 11/27/2023 3.A.aPacket Pg. 6Attachment: Staff Report VA-PL20230009299 11272023 (27321 : PL20230009299 VA 267 3rd Street West - VA-PL20230009299; 267 3rd St W – Lot 2 Page 3 of 7 11/27/2023 SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: North: Little Hickory Bay then a preserve for Little Hickory Bay Condominium located within the Little Hickory Bay PUD South: 3rd Street West (Right-of-Way) then a boat launch area in a RSF-4 zoning district East: Unimproved boat dock lot in a Residential Single-Family-4 (RSF-4) zoning district West: Boat dock facility in a Residential Single-Family-4 (RSF-4) zoning district Collier County GIS Collier County GIS 3.A.a Packet Pg. 7 Attachment: Staff Report VA-PL20230009299 11272023 (27321 : PL20230009299 VA 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder) VA-PL20230009299; 267 3rd St W – Lot 2 Page 4 of 7 11/27/2023 PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT (Continued from Page 1) related to Petition No. PU-87-17C, attached. With respect to the required side yard/riparian setbacks, staff notes that Resolution No. 2000-51, relating to Petition No. V-99-26 was approved to allow many of the subject “boat dock lots” to enjoy a zero-foot setback. Said resolution allows for a zero-foot setback for 11 of the 23 previously described boat dock lots and for 8 of 11 “boat dock lots” located across 3rd Street West in Block H of the same subdivision or 19 of 34, the majority of “boat dock lots within this subdivision. By appearances, the petitioner of the subject Variance request could have joined the prior zoning action had they owned the property at the time; said Variance was approved by the Board of Zoning Appeals on February 8, 2000, with the following conditions: 1. These docks are private in nature and shall not be used for rental purposes; and 2. These docks shall not be used for any commercial purposes, including mooring commercial boats. Since the adoption of Resolution 2000-51, four additional variances have been approved within Block G to reduce the side yard/riparian setbacks to zero or near zero, each with similar conditions; said properties are identified as Lots 3, 8, 13, and 21. Staff notes that Lot 3, which adjoins the subject property, was granted a zero setback by means of HEX No. 2020-03, pertaining to petition VA-PL20170001588, on January 29, 2020. The petitioner desires to construct a new dock facility comprising a single dock with two boat slips, each with a boat lift, which is the subject of a companion Boat Dock Extension, BDE- PL20220006082. Said BDE addresses the dock facility itself and maximum protrusion into the waterway. The requested variance is to reduce the required side yard/riparian setbacks from 7.5 feet to zero, which, as per the aforementioned variance (V-99-26), is consistent with other boat dock lots in this area. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: The subject property is in the Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict, and is seaward of the Coastal High Hazard Area Boundary on the County’s Future Land Use Map (FLUM) of the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the GMP. The GMP does not address individual Variance requests but deals with the larger issue of the actual use. The existing single- family use is consistent with the FLUM of the GMP. The requested variance does not have any impact on this property's consistency with the County's GMP. ZONING ANALYSIS: The decision to grant a variance is based on the criteria in LDC Section 9.04.03.A–H (in bold font below). Staff has analyzed this petition relative to these provisions and offers the following responses: a. Are there special conditions and circumstances existing that are peculiar to the location, 3.A.a Packet Pg. 8 Attachment: Staff Report VA-PL20230009299 11272023 (27321 : PL20230009299 VA 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder) VA-PL20230009299; 267 3rd St W – Lot 2 Page 5 of 7 11/27/2023 size, and characteristics of the land, structure, or building involved? Yes. The subject property is legally nonconforming with respect to the required lot area and width and is not capable of supporting any listed permitted use within the RSF-4 zoning area in which it is located. Given these circumstances, the subject property is one of 23 for which a Provisional Use (now known as a Conditional Use) was granted in 1987 to allow such properties to be used for “non-commercial boat launching facilities.” Additionally, there is a limited amount of shoreline, which results in a narrow riparian area further constricted by neighboring dock facilities that limit the direction and orientation of any dock facility at this location. Most, if not all, of the docking facilities along the subject shoreline have or will require a BDE and Variance to be code-compliant. b. Are there special conditions and circumstances that do not result from the applicant's action, such as pre-existing conditions relative to the property, which are the subject of the Variance request? Yes. The property’s natural shoreline and length of shoreline require additional protrusion due to the narrow riparian lines, resulting in docks along this shoreline requiring a variance from riparian setbacks to comply with current regulations. The proposed dock facility will be consistent with other boat dock lots in the area previously granted a variance (Resolution 00-51). c. Will a literal interpretation of the provisions of this zoning code work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant or create practical difficulties for the applicant? The applicant’s agent states: “Yes, denial of a side setback variance for this property would severely limit the buildability and use of the lot, particularly in comparison to the nearby boat dock lots.” Staff agrees that denying this petition would create practical difficulties for the applicant. d. Will the Variance, if granted, be the minimum Variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building, or structure and promote health, safety, and welfare standards? The applicant’s agent states that they propose only using the space within their riparian area using the same setback as many nearby dock facilities and that a side setback of zero is reasonable, given the circumstances. Staff finds that the proposed dock facility has been fully minimized by means of using a 3-foot finger pier with boat lifts on either side, and given that one lift is proposed for use by two personal watercraft, only one slip will have a full-size marine vessel; therefore, staff concurs. e. Will granting the Variance confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by these zoning regulations to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district? By definition, a Variance bestows some dimensional relief from the zoning regulations specific to a site. LDC Section 9.04.02 allows relief through the Variance process for any 3.A.a Packet Pg. 9 Attachment: Staff Report VA-PL20230009299 11272023 (27321 : PL20230009299 VA 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder) VA-PL20230009299; 267 3rd St W – Lot 2 Page 6 of 7 11/27/2023 dimensional development standard. As such, other properties facing similar hardships would be entitled to make a similar request and be conferred equal consideration on a case-by-case basis. f.Will granting the Variance be in harmony with this Land Development Code's general intent and purpose and not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare? Yes, the applicant’s agent states: “The dock facility code as outlined in Chapter 5.03.06A. states that: “Docks and the like are primarily intended to adequately secure moored vessels and provide safe access for routine maintenance and use while minimally impacting navigation within any adjacent navigable channel, the use of the waterway, the use of neighboring docks, the native marine habitat, manatees, and the view of the waterway by the neighboring property owners.” The dock design as proposed (a 3’ X 38’ finger pier) is too narrow to provide any other function but to access and maintain [SIC] the vessels on the attached boat lifts. The project will leave 87’ of space (more than 50% of the waterway width) for navigation, which is ample for public use and should not impact the neighbors. Neither should the dock impact submerged resources and, by extension, manatees. Considering that the project as proposed is consistent with the general area’s uses and other docks in the vicinity, we do not believe views will be impacted either. Therefore, our opinion is that the proposed dock is in harmony with the intent and purpose of the zoning code.” Staff concurs. g.Are there natural conditions or physically induced conditions that ameliorate the goals and objectives of the regulation, such as natural preserves, lakes, golf courses, etc.? No; however, the applicant’s agent provides the following: “The area which the proposed structures would cover per this variance petition consists of the surface waters of a tidally connected waterway. Construction within the riparian lines, as proposed, will have no effect on the water and has been designed to be compliant with the applicable state and federal approval from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.” Staff concurs. h.Will granting the Variance be consistent with the Growth Management Plan? Yes, approval of this Variance will not affect or change the requirements of the GMP with respect to density, intensity, compatibility, access/connectivity, or any other applicable provisions. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) RECOMMENDATION: The EAC does not normally hear variance petitions. The EAC did not hear this petition since the subject variance doesn’t impact any preserve area. 3.A.a Packet Pg. 10 Attachment: Staff Report VA-PL20230009299 11272023 (27321 : PL20230009299 VA 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder) VA-PL20230009299; 267 3rd St W – Lot 2 Page 7 of 7 11/27/2023 CONCURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS: Companion Petition No. BD-PL20220006082, to allow the proposed boat dock facility to protrude a total of 38 feet into a waterway that is 125± feet wide. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Collier County Hearing Examiner APPROVE Petition VA-PL20230009299 to reduce the minimum side/riparian setback from 7.5 feet to zero on both sides, as depicted within the “Proposed Dock” plan contained within Attachment A, subject to the following conditions that were stipulated within Resolution No. 2000-51: 1.This dock is private in nature and shall not be used for rental purposes; and 2.This dock shall not be used for any commercial purposes, including mooring commercial boats. Attachments: A.Dock Facility Plans B.Map of Boundary Survey C.Resolution 1987-260 D.Resolution 2000-51 E.Zoning Maps F.Applicant’s Backup: Application, Narrative, Authorizations, etc. G.Posting of Public Hearing Sign 3.A.a Packet Pg. 11 Attachment: Staff Report VA-PL20230009299 11272023 (27321 : PL20230009299 VA 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder) STATE OF FLORIDACOUNTY AERIAL VICINITY MAPSTATE OF FLORIDACOUNTY AERIAL VICINITY MAPNOTES:<> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SUBJECTPROPERTYSUBJECTPROPERTY<> LATITUDE: N 26.327090<> LONGITUDE: W -81.831033SITE ADDRESS:<> 267 3RD ST W #2 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:P:\22141.00 Wingfelder - 267 3rd St W Unit 2\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\22141-BDE-2.0.dwg LOCATION MAP 9/8/2023THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875NPRMJ05-05-2322141-0525267 3RD ST W #2LOCATION MAP48-------------------01 OF 03COLLIER COUNTYCOLLIER COUNTYGULF OF MEXICOGULF OF MEXICO8588288641MARCOISLANDEVERGLADESCITY9329846NAPLES90908399483783784129292983983992887846951862I-758486431856850846890896NESWKEY WESTTAMPAFT.MYERSMIAMINAPLESSUBJECTPROPERTY3.A.bPacket Pg. 12Attachment: Attachment A - Dock Facility Plans (27321 : PL20230009299 VA 267 3rd Street West - 8.1'7.8'7.4'5.1'4.4'5.4'3.2'3.9'4.3'3.2'2.8'2.2'P:\22141.00 Wingfelder - 267 3rd St W Unit 2\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\22141-BDE-2.0.dwg 9/8/2023NESW0 5 1020SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:P:\22141.00 Wingfelder - 267 3rd St W Unit 2\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\22141-BDE-2.0.dwg PROPOSED DOCK 9/8/2023THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875NPRMJ05-05-2322141-0525267 3RD ST W #2PROPOSED DOCK48-------------------02 OF 03·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOTINTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.·ALL WATER DEPTHS AND DREDGE ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO MLW·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF):·EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX):·TIDAL DATUM:··MHW (NAVD)=··MLW (NAVD)=NOTES:·PROPOSED OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·TOTAL OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM MHWL:"BENCHMARK LAND SERVICES, INC."01-23-23-0.55'+0.01'30'0125'10710738'14'EXISTINGSEAWALLPROPERTYBOUNDARYPROPOSED14'X14' BOATLIFTPROPOSED10'X12' BOATLIFT3'PROPOSEDFIXEDFINGER PIER38' PROTRUSION10'12'AA04BB0538'14'0' SIDESETBACK0' SIDESETBACKSTANDARD 20'PROTRUSIONLIMIT FORCOLLIER COUNTY30'3.A.bPacket Pg. 13Attachment: Attachment A - Dock Facility Plans (27321 : PL20230009299 VA 267 3rd Street West - P:\22141.00 Wingfelder - 267 3rd St W Unit 2\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\22141-BDE-2.0.dwg 9/8/2023NESW0 30 60120SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:P:\22141.00 Wingfelder - 267 3rd St W Unit 2\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\22141-BDE-2.0.dwg ADJACENT DOCKS 9/8/2023THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875NPRMJ05-05-2322141-0525267 3RD ST W #2ADJACENT DOCKS48-------------------03 OF 03PROPERTYBOUNDARY48'55'51'38'38'38'NOTE:THE DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATEAND ARE TAKEN FROM THE AERIAL IMAGE.38'132'134'3.A.bPacket Pg. 14Attachment: Attachment A - Dock Facility Plans (27321 : PL20230009299 VA 267 3rd Street West - 3.A.c Packet Pg. 15 Attachment: Attachment B - SURVEY - 267 3rd St W unit 2 (27321 : PL20230009299 VA 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder) Ini), HHl ' ~;j OCTOBER 27, 1987 Ite.'7Bl USOLU'1'IOlf 87-210, PBTITIOlf 110-87-17C, COJOl1l1fITY DIVBLOPHBlCT DIVISIOII UQt1BSTIBCJ .ROVISIOlfAL UBI "1\" OP m1I asP-4 DISTRICT POR MOlf-COHKIRCIAL BOAT LAUHCRI}~ PACILITIES - ADOPTED Planner Weeks stated the property is located approximately 1/4 mile south of Bonita Beach Road, and 3/4 mile ~eBt of Vanderbilt Drive in the Littl., Hickory Shores Subdivision. He stated that the Board directed staff to initiate a Provisional Use for this property beca- use of the small lot size which cannot be used for a principal struc- ture. He said it appears that these lots were intended for boat' " dock lots, however, that is not indicated on the plat. Mr. Weeks stated the rr,PC has reviewed this petition and forwarded it with 8'reeommendation of approval. He said correspondence on this petition was received, with six letters in favor and one in oppositiort. He noted the letter of op~osition was due to misinformation and after clarification by Staff, the objection was verbally withdrawn. Staff teeommends approval. In;re.pon.e to Chairman Hasse, planning/Zoning Director McKim stated .the docks are for private use only, however, renting of boat' docks is a problem throughout the County. She explained that Staff only becomes aware of this type of violation if there is a complaint. co..issioner .istor moved, seconded by commissioner Goodnight and oarried unenimously, that Resolution 87-260, .etition 'U-87-17C, for non-co~eroial boat launohing faoillties for property looated approximately 1/4 mile south of Bonite Beaoh Road and 3/4 mil. .est of Vanderbilt Driv., be adopted. n.),; q r'-'1, prr.q -,11'.1J, i; j ~ t I' c:~t!~ !b r 3.A.d Packet Pg. 16 Attachment: Attachment C - Resolution 1987-260 (27321 : PL20230009299 VA 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder) RESOLOTIOII 87- ~O OCT 271987 REUTlNG TO PI:TITlON 110. PU-87-17C FOR PROVISIONAL USI! OF PROPERTY IIEREINAFTER DESCRIBED IN COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA. WHEREAS. tho LoShll.turo of tho St.to of Florido in Ch.ptor 67...1246, Lav. of Florid... and Chapter 125, Florida Statut.., h.. conferred Oft Collier CoUlJty the power to .at.bIt_h, coordinate and. 1'DI!orcI 1001nl and' .uch bu.inl.' rl.ulation. a. ar. uc....ry for thu prot.ction of tha pubU.c; and lREllEAS, Th. CoUDty purauant thlrlto ha. adoptld a eo.pr.han.lv. Zoning Ordinlncl ..tlbU.bins rlsulationa for the zonins of particullr I.llsr.phie divialona of the County. allOnl which 1a the Irautina of prllvi81on.al n.a.; and WHEREAS. the Colli.. County Pl.nnins eo..t..ion, beinl the duly pl,ointod .nd conotitutod platlninl bo.rd for tho .r.. horoby .ffoctld. hall b.ld . pubil.c h....i.n. .ftar Dotic. al in .aid r.gulat10111 ..d. Ind pt'lTf'ld.d. and ba. couaid.r.d the advlubl1ity of Proviliona1 U.. "a" in I lSF-4 zona for the prop4lrty harelnafter de.cribed. and baa found II a uttar of fact (Exhibit "A") tbat satilfaetary prCTf'illan and arrAngement ba. baen ..de eoncernlnl all applicabla ..ttlr. rlquirld by aid ra.ulation. and in 'lccordancl with Section 13 - 1d of thl ZoniDI Rogulation. for tho Collio.. County Pl.nDins eo-i..ionl .nd W'RER.!AS. all intlrllll:ld plrtil. ha". baln si"ln opportunity to be h..rd by thia Bo.rd in public ..otinl ......blod .nd tho Bo.rd ,,"viDl coneidar.d all _tt.r. pre:lantld. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED. BY THE BOARD or ZOlIIRG APPEALS of ColIior County, Florid. th.t tho potition of Co.ouDity Dovolop..nt 01"i.ioo. repra..ntiq tM 50ard 'Jf County Coadaaionerl, rith rllpect to the proparty herlinaftlr d.lcrib.d a.: loti 1 through 23, Block "en. Little Hickory Shore.. Unlt 13. II rlcorded in P~lt Book 6, PI.e 2. Official R.cord. of Collior County 1m lU9 Fl~l 27 3.A.d Packet Pg. 17 Attachment: Attachment C - Resolution 1987-260 (27321 : PL20230009299 VA 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder) I""" 109fl'ot 28 l..'" b. and i:,\ I, OCT 271987 the .... i. hareby approved for Pt'ovl11onal U.. "a" of the ISr-4 lonlna diltrict for Non-t::o...rclal BOlt Lnunchlng Facf lit i.. t aubj.~t to tho follov1ns conditionl' a.At tial of obtaicinl a dock pl.-it, I risht-of-vay porait shall b. obtained Ind the owner ,hall provide Ree... iaprov...ntl to prevlnt daus_ to the rOldway and roadwlY drainlSI laprov...ntl. b. All boat doclta aractad on thl lubjoct lota ..ot cOllply with Section 8.46 of tho Zonins Ordinanco (82-2). BE IT FURTlIEIl RESOLVED that tbia raloluUon bl racordad in tha aioutal of thia acard. eo-i..loner offorad tha forlsoina rOlolutionPlator nd 8OVod itl adoption. ..condod by eoa.iaaionor C"'.nMl"d c:1hfo and upon roll call, the vote va.: AlESI Commissioners Pistor, Goodnight, Glass, Saunders and Hasse NATS I None AIlSEIIT AlID lOT VOTING. Ilone AIlSTEIlTIOII: None Ilcm. tbia 27th OCtober 1987.day of IOAlD or Z0II111G APPEALS COLL~' FLOlIDA" ~ ST. a IlAltA. SIt.J"'~ t\',\o/?la" Attta't, JAII!S"Cl. GILES. CLItRX BY'~-::"""")y~....5 vfr~ Magn, ~ty Clerk APPlllVED AS TO FOIlK A/lD LEGAL ~lJFFICIEJlCYI a ~,*..~ R. IlUCE I OM ASSISTAIIT COU1ITT ATTOlUIET PU-87-I7C ....olution 3.A.d Packet Pg. 18 Attachment: Attachment C - Resolution 1987-260 (27321 : PL20230009299 VA 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder) OCT 271987 EXIIIIIIT A FIIIDIlIO OF FACT BT COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A PROVISIONAL USE PETITION FOR PU-87-17C The followina facti ar. founds 1. Saction 7. I lb. ) ) (.) prntaloGa 1 u... of the Zoning OrdinancI authorized the 2. Grantina the prov1aionaI u.o viII not adv.r..ly affoct tha public inter.at and viII not adyer..ly .ffact othlr property or u... In the .... d1atrict or nailbborhood bICIU.. of: A. Caneral complianc. with the Comprahenlivl Plan: Compll.. with Comprehlnlivl Plan Tn..&.. No_ B. Ingr... and ISr... to prop.rty and propo..d structural thereon with particular raflrlncl to automotive Ind ped.ltri.D ..laty and convlniencl, traffic flow and control. and ace... in c... of fira or cata.trophl: Ad.qu.t~nlr... , aar... T.I -Z::.- Ko_ c. Affectl nlighbor101 proplrtie. in relation to noi.., alarl, economic or odor Iffectl: No .ff.ct or Affoct mitis.tod by Afflct cannot be _itig.ted D. Conaral compatibility vith adjacent proportio. and othor proporty in tho diotrict. Compatiblo uoa vithin diatrict Too ')( No _ I...d on the above flDd1nsa, this provisional use . stipulations, (copy attachld) (.k9~lA Mft~) b. rae DATE. /~/i7 I nID1IIll OF FACT FOIII oo~ JL()l}Pl~[ ~!} 3.A.d Packet Pg. 19 Attachment: Attachment C - Resolution 1987-260 (27321 : PL20230009299 VA 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder) 13 Al RESOLUTION NO. 2000-2.!.- RELATING TO PETITION NUMBER V-99-26 FOR A VARIANCE ON PROPERTY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on all counties in Florida the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code Ordinance No. 91-102) which establishes regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of variances; and WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Appeals, being the duly elected constituted Board of the area hereby affected, has held a public hearing after notice as in said regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisability of a 7. 5-foot variance from the required side yard setback of 7.5 feet to -0- feet as shown on the attached plot plan, Exhibit "A", in an RSF-4 Zone for the property hereinafter described, and has found as a matter of fact that satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations and in accordance with Section 2.7.5 of the Zoning Regulations of said Land Development Code for the unincorporated area of Collier County; and WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this Board in public meeting assembled, and the Board having considered all matters presented; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS of Collier County, Florida, that: The Petition V-99-26 filed by James M. Boswell, II, representing property owners of blocks "G" & "H" Little Hickory Shores Unit 3, with respect to the property hereinafter described as: Exhibit "B" be and the same hereby is approved for a 7.5-foot variance from the required side yard setback of 75 feet to -0- feet as shown on the attached plot plan, Exhibit "Au, of the RSF -4 Zoning District wherein said property is located, subject to the following conditions Exhibit "C" BE IT RESOLVED that this Resolution relating to Petition Number V-99-26 be recorded in the minutes of this Board. 1- 3.A.e Packet Pg. 20 Attachment: Attachment D - Resolution 2000-051 (27321 : PL20230009299 VA 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder) This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote. Done this 1S"4:h day of ~ ,2000. ATTEST: . . DWlGBT E. BROCK, Clerk A ,1>'- Attest 4S to Cha!,..n's J8.M.$J!cfts qB \1drrn and Legal Sufficiency: C1JIN'7Yl~ Mar 1 M. Scuden Assistant County Attorney g/adminJ RESOLl.JI10NN -99-26/CB/ts BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS COLLIER OUNTY, FLORIDA 2- 13 Al CHAIRMAN 3.A.e Packet Pg. 21 Attachment: Attachment D - Resolution 2000-051 (27321 : PL20230009299 VA 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder) 13 Al t7.th1' 5 tU7 {) . l ~ i: f'/(7~'.:' loordnule l 4,.... r::::: 6 3::~ ~. Z. 9 1\ \ I/~ " \;_ 1~ f0o~ r \.. lIfR181 htJf j)~t'" J 3(717)- ~ I TIJII' plg/l III" 8. 5.86 i 7(/ o Cl. u. 0- J!'ppro~e'J- MirJr Ll u 1"#.7..1'1'1 .:1"69 - '-". J~"~~II~" Nn;'~i/>-:-v'/7,1 Aj ?--~ -I '""Q C> c... AI ,1'.7J 'It I~ 1 .. I~, I ~ Q"~<~. 60' I \! PRM l\ i .!l ~ :::"!; t ~,~ l 'f~'" 1. 'i. ~ If j ;"Jd~ C>> tt-- .r~' I:> Q,... C" 7,. J '/J Jr. <j/lG' r.r()/'Iolll o/,~I.1'.:7r~J JQ"'/~J /, Iid~/'II Q/I.7 :.kcre/ory 1// L'JIII/!' I.f ,,/ //tJr/f/t7, /tJmr' j fC"r'f r:kcf. - ',7 '10'1 a.'1 N~ Ie I Ql'ld (J't>~d' <7f lId/II16'Y 171/i'''Cl1 II/en-IV un f' ,.. ./i.1 7<6/ -,.,-,/ d~",dl EXHIBIT A" r-. 3.A.e Packet Pg. 22 Attachment: Attachment D - Resolution 2000-051 (27321 : PL20230009299 VA 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder) 13 Al LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lots 3,4.5.6,7,8,9,10, Block "H" and Lots 4,5,9,10,11,12,14,17, 18, 19, 20, Block "G" Little Hickory Shores Unit 3, replat, as recorded in Plat Book 6, page 2 of Official Records of Collier County, Florida. EXHIBIT "B" 3.A.e Packet Pg. 23 Attachment: Attachment D - Resolution 2000-051 (27321 : PL20230009299 VA 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder) 13 At CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL V.99.26 This approval is conditioned upon the following stipulations requested by the Collier County Planning Commission in their public hearing on January 6, 2000. 1. These docks are private in nature and shall not be used for rental purposes. 2. These docks shall not be used for any commercial purposes including the mooring of commercial boats. EXHIBIT "C" 3.A.e Packet Pg. 24 Attachment: Attachment D - Resolution 2000-051 (27321 : PL20230009299 VA 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder) LAST REVISION: ZONING ___________________ OTHER ___________________SUBDIVISON INDEX ATTEST___________________________CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA TWP 48S RNG 25E SEC(S) 5 NO 1/2 MAP NUMBER: BY___________________________CHAIRMAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISION HICKORYLITTLE 1050'S59D27'W PUD 10 THIRD STREET WESTLELYBAREFOOTBEACH N89D44'W-2000.11' PUD18,19,20,21,25,68,82,91,96,107 A 5 8 1400' 9 5 7930"5 6 11,95BD 10 11 12 LITTLE HICKORY BAY N0D36'W-2555.33'2 3 4 1 15 F 13 14 16Pu"a "5 2 4 NON-STSTST PARCEL 5A59.55AC BAY5030,RMF-16 400'260'5 960' 18 32 22211920181614131512 WEST AVENUEFOREST AVENUEVANDERBILT DRIVE (CR901)22 DOLPHIN COVE COURTRSF-3 AUDUBON COUNTRY CLUB 6 28 SIXTH STREET WEST PUD232'19184 NON-ST 6 ST BD17 16 BD 15 14,42 20 15 14 8 1310BD 9 6 7 6 21 22 17BD 23 24 13 12 11 10 2625 27 E 9 8 7 E 7 116 6 2 21 20 1,2,9,31,34,46,101 5 4 8 2 1 6 4 29 30 31 5 4 3 32 33 2 1 4 6 5 9 8 3 2 18 12 10 1 SIXTH STREET 109 8 7 11 6 5 17 1110 1312 1413 4 3 15 2 1 15 14 1716 EIGHTH STREET SEVENTH STREET 19 5 4 31 124 23 3 2 13 12 2322 21 2524 20 19 15 14 11 10WEST17 16 9 8 29EAST 28 27 26 7 30 30 14 2726 18 17 2928 16 15 32 12 2031 13 34 33 11 10 21 RMF-12 25 24 23 22 1920 18 17 2 SIXTH STREET LAKEVIEW11 393635 9 8 3837 7 6 3 40 5 4 41 2 1 16 15 13 14 12 11 10 98 7 6 10 5 4 12 4 21 C-3 7 5 6 9 8 4 3DRIVE 1110 2 1 C-1 1312 3 2 1 3 17 12 5 2 1 11 22 5 20 5 23 24 RSF-4 22FIRST STREET RMF-6 HICKORY HARBOR CONDOMINIUM SECOND STREET B THIRD STREET 23 4 3 5 3 25 5 3 3V 24 4 3 3 4 6.4' S 3 0 D 3 3 " E350'2122 1 20 1819 32 4 5 24 23 1 2 22 21 20 19 43 65 7 6 FIFTH ST WEST RMF-12 5 34 12 D 6 D 1 2 4 3 FIFTH STREET 9 8 7 6 109 1211 5 4 16 3 2 14 13 15 1615 8 7 6 5 1514 13 12 1716 11 10 4 3 2 1 20 1918 9 8 217 9 141617 C 15 6 7 C 8 1213 10 11 10 151817 B 16 87 9 1314 11 12 1413 12 11 1615 10 9 18 17 8 7 19 6 6 V 1615 14 13 1817 12 11 20 2221 19 10 9 8 7 3 C-431.2 1.1 25 24 2.22 3 2223 A 2021 4 5 A 6 7 LEE COUNTYBONITA BEACH ROAD (CR 865) 11 16181917 8 9 10 15 14 12 13 3 1 1716 15 14 1918 13 12 23 22 9 2120 11 10 8 7 2 V 7 39 16 37 16 35 16 2 1 27 17181920222325242126 33 30 DRIVEDRIVEVALLEY1 20 19 14 22 21 VALLEY6 5 4 3 23 2423 4 3 25 2 1 28 29 38 SHOREWOODSCONDOMINIUM35 34 37 36 Lot 1 13 FOURTH STREET 39 31 32 3433 35 36 3837 28 25 26 25 VALLEY DRIVE242221 4 23 3 2 1 27 26 27 2 2524 6 5 26 4 3 28 1 THIRD STREET 29 30 2324 3231 22 21 35 18 33 34 20 19 36 17 SECOND STREET 27 28 2324 29 30 22 21 33 18 31 32 1920 34 17 12356478910111215 48 FIFTH STREET 9 8 7 6 5 4 1011 9 8 1312 1514 3 2 41 40 43428 11 10 9 8 4544 4746 9 3 20 67 10 45 18 17 16 19 12C-32221 576 4 3 5049 5251 2 1 2 5453 1 46 7 44 7 14 13 39 38 15 14 4140 1213 5 4342 11 10 4544 89 37 36 1415 3938 13 12 4 424140 1011 43 89 4847 6 5 5049 34 5251 12 4645 56 4847 4 3 5049 12 33 16 2625 6 5 2827 4 3 ,23,8116V 3029 2 1 FIRST STREET 2625 24 23 2827 22 21 31 18 3029 20 19 32 17 42 7C-4 36 35 34 15 14 37 13 12 1 403938 11 10 41 9 8 4443 6 5 45 4 3 2 1 1 5 G BD ,V26,99 1234567891011121314151617181920212223 1234567891011H 27BD V28 29BD 1 GULFWAYCONDO HICKORY BAY WEST 32V BD33 BD35 36BD37CU BD38 CU 39 40BD 41BD BD43 44BD BD45 47BDBD48 49BD BD50 C U 5 1 BD52 BD53 BD54 55V BD56 58V 57V BD59 60BD 3 61BD CU62 BD63 BD64 V 65 66BD BD67 BD12 V 6 BD69 BD70 BD71 BD72 BD73 BD74 75BDBD76 BD77 V7879,104 105BD , V BD80 83BD 84BD 85,86BD BD 87 88BD 89BD90BD BD92BD93 BD,V 94 BD97 98V 100 V ,BD102103 BD106 108BD BD109 $NO. NAME P.B. Pg.1 BONITA SHORES NO.1 3 12 BONITA SHORES NO.2 3 433 LITTLE HICKORY SHORES NO.1 3 64 LITTLE HICKORY SHORES NO.2 3 795 LITTLE HICKORY SHORES NO.3 (REPLAT) 6 26 DOLPHIN COVE 19 55-56 INDICATES SPECIAL TREATMENT OVERLAY 8505N 8505S8506N LEE COUNTY1The Historic/Archaeological Probability Maps are the officialCounty source designating historic or archaeologic resources.ZONING NOTES1 R-82-11-C2 R-87-12C3 V-88-12 88-282456 3-11-97 V-96-33 97-1657 11-19-85 V-85-28C 85-2418 6-25-91 R-91-4 91-549 6-25-91 PUD-87-12(1) 91-5310 LDC-9111 3-5-92 BD-92-1 92-412 8-6-98 BD-98-28 98-3213 12-17-92 BD-92-9 92-2914 5-20-93 BD-93-5 93-1515 5-20-93 BD-93-6 93-1416 11-23-93 V-93-29 93-54817 12-2-93 BD-93-20 93-3718 PDA-85-1,2C19 PDA-86-17C20 PDA-86-18C21 8-2-88 PDA-88-7 88-6322 1-25-94 V-93-34 94-3623 3-8-94 V-94-1 94-15824 10-27-87 PU-87-17C 87-26025 5-24-94 PUD-77-19(6) 94-2826 6-15-95 BD-95-6 95-1927 9-7-95 BD-95-13 95-3128 9-12-95 V-95-12 95-53329 11-2-95 BD-95-18 95-4730 12-12-95 R-95-8 95-7531 1-9-96 PUD-82-11(3) 96-132 9-10-96 V-96-16 96-41933 10-3-96 BD-96-15 96-3534 11-12-96 PUD-82-11(4) 96-6935 12-5-96 BD-96-22 96-4636 12-19-96 BD-96-23 96-4737 1-14-97 CU-96-22 97-5038 4-3-97 BD-97-3 97-1239 4-22-97 CU-97-6 97-22340 5-15-97 BD-97-11 97-1841 7-3-97 BD-97-16 97-3242 9-4-97 BD-97-17 97-3643 6-4-98 BD-98-10 98-2044 5-21-98 BD-98-20 98-2545 9-17-98 BD-98-30 98-3946 9-17-98 PDI-98-4 8-3847 11-5-98 BD-98-32 98-4648 11-5-98 BD-98-34 98-4749 12-17-98 BD-98-38 98-5550 12-3-98 BD-98-36 98-5351 5-11-99 CU-99-4 99-23652 6-3-99 BD-99-8 99-2253 8-19-99 BD-99-16 99-3054 8-5-99 BD-99-12 99-2855 10-26-99 V-99-13 99-40056 1-20-00 BD-99-26 00-0157 2-8-00 V-99-26 00-5158 3-14-00 V-99-27 00-8559 2-17-00 BD-99-28 00-0360 5-4-00 BD-00-9 00-561 6-1-00 BD-00-8 00-1662 5-23-00 CU-00-1 00-15763 7-20-00 BD-00-13 00-1964 9-7-00 BD-00-18 00-2565 10-10-00 V-00-18 00-35366 11-16-00 BD-00-26 00-3467 5-3-01 BD-01-AR-351 01-0968 6-26-01 PUDA-01-AR-546 01-3569 10-4-01 BD-01-AR-1122 01-2570 4-4-02 BD-01-AR-1608 02-0371 9-5-02 BD-02-AR-2416 02-0672 9-16-02 BD-02-AR-2564 02-0573 12-19-02 BD-02-AR-3019 02-1074 2-5-04 BD-03-AR-4689 04-0275 7-15-04 BD-04-AR-5697 04-0876 7-15-04 BD-04-AR-5699 04-0777 7-15-04 BD-04-AR-5693 04-0678 5-24-05 V-04-AR-6970 05-21379 5-5-05 BD-05-AR-7155 05-0680 11-17-05 BD-05-AR-7970 05-1081 4-25-06 V-05-AR-8857 06-10882 5-23-06 PUDZ-04-AR-6283 06-2283 4-19-07 BD-06-AR-10900 07-0484 5-17-07 BD-06-AR-11004 07-0585 12-6-07 BD-07-AR-12154 07-0886 4-22-08 ADA-07-AR-12714 08-11987 11-22-08 BD-08-AR-13305 08-0588 5-6-10 BD-PL-09-918 10-0289 12-2-10 BD-PL-10-1297 10-0690 2-3-11 BD-PL-10-1313 11-0191 2-22-11 PUDA-PL-09-742 11-0492 9-6-12 BD-PL-12-26 12-0793 10-6-11 BD-PL-10-1473 11-0694 7-20-16 VA-PL-15-2429 AND BD-PL-15-37 HEX-16-2595 12-20-17 BD-PL-16-541 HEX-17-3596 9-11-18 PUDA-PL-17-4421 18-4197 1-18-19 BDE-PL-17-2736 HEX 19-0298 2-21-19 VA-PL-18-2673 HEX 19-0899 1-29-20 BDE-PL-18-3700 HEX 20-02100 1-29-20 VA-PL-17-1588 HEX 20-03101 1-28-20 PUDA-PL-19-502 20-07102 7-14-20 VA-PL-19-2360 20-128103 6-11-20 BDE-PL-19-1962 CCPC 20-02104 6-8-21 BDE-PL-20-2151 HEX 21-17105 6-8-21 VA-PL-20-2152 HEX 21-18106 9-24-21 BD-PL-20-1106 HEX-21-40107 5-12-22 PDI-PL-21-2729 HEX 22-22108 3-10-23 BD-PL-22-501 HEX 23-04109 8-9-23 BDE-PL-20-1107 HEX 23-23DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS MODIFICATIONS12-12-95 R-95-B 95-75THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A PAGE OF THEOFFICIAL ZONING ATLAS REFERRED TO AND ADOPTEDBY REFERENCE BY ORDINANCE NO. 04-41 OF THECOUNTY OF COLLIER, FLORIDA, ADOPTED JUNE 22, 2004,AS AMENDED BY THE ZONING NOTES AND SUBDIVISIONINDEX REFERENCED HEREON. 0 400 SCALE9/18/20233.A.f Packet Pg. 25 Attachment: Attachment E - Zoning Map_8505n (27321 : PL20230009299 VA 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder) 3.A.g Packet Pg. 26 Attachment: Attachment F - Applicant's Backup - PL20230009299 (27321 : PL20230009299 VA 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder) 3.A.g Packet Pg. 27 Attachment: Attachment F - Applicant's Backup - PL20230009299 (27321 : PL20230009299 VA 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder) 3.A.g Packet Pg. 28 Attachment: Attachment F - Applicant's Backup - PL20230009299 (27321 : PL20230009299 VA 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder) 3.A.g Packet Pg. 29 Attachment: Attachment F - Applicant's Backup - PL20230009299 (27321 : PL20230009299 VA 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder) 3.A.g Packet Pg. 30 Attachment: Attachment F - Applicant's Backup - PL20230009299 (27321 : PL20230009299 VA 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder) 3.A.g Packet Pg. 31 Attachment: Attachment F - Applicant's Backup - PL20230009299 (27321 : PL20230009299 VA 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder) 3.A.g Packet Pg. 32 Attachment: Attachment F - Applicant's Backup - PL20230009299 (27321 : PL20230009299 VA 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder) 3.A.g Packet Pg. 33 Attachment: Attachment F - Applicant's Backup - PL20230009299 (27321 : PL20230009299 VA 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder) 3.A.g Packet Pg. 34 Attachment: Attachment F - Applicant's Backup - PL20230009299 (27321 : PL20230009299 VA 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder) &ƌŽŵ͗:ŽŚŶ<ĞůůǇ ^ĞŶƚ͗tĞĚŶĞƐĚĂǇ͕EŽǀĞŵďĞƌϮϵ͕ϮϬϮϯϵ͗ϬϱD dŽ͗:ŽŚŶ<ĞůůǇ ^ƵďũĞĐƚ͗sͲW>ϮϬϮϯϬϬϬϵϮϵϵĂŶĚͲW>ϮϬϮϮϬϬϬϲϬϴϮͲϮϲϳϯƌĚ^ƚƌĞĞƚtĞƐƚ >ŽƚϮͲ^ŝŐŶWŽƐƚŝŶŐ ƚƚĂĐŚŵĞŶƚƐ͗WŽƐƚŝŶŐϭ͘ũƉŐ͖WŽƐƚŝŶŐϮ͘ũƉŐ /͕:ŽŚŶ<ĞůůǇ͕ƉĞƌƐŽŶĂůůǇƉŽƐƚĞĚĂWƵďůŝĐ,ĞĂƌŝŶŐƐŝŐŶƚŽƚŚĞĨƌŽŶƚŽĨƚŚĞƐƵďũĞĐƚůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶ͕ŝŵŵĞĚŝĂƚĞůǇ ĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚƚŽƚŚĞƉƵďůŝĐƌŝŐŚƚͲŽĨͲǁĂǇ͕ĂƚĂƉƉƌŽǆŝŵĂƚĞůǇϯ͗ϬϬW͘D͘ŽŶdƵĞƐĚĂǇ͕EŽǀĞŵďĞƌϮϴ͕ϮϬϮϯ͕ĨŽƌƚŚĞ ϭϭͬϮϭͬϮϬϮϯŵĞĞƚŝŶŐŽĨƚŚĞ,ĞĂƌŝŶŐǆĂŵŝŶĞƌĂƐĞǀŝĚĞŶĐĞĚďǇƚŚĞĂƚƚĂĐŚĞĚƉŚŽƚŽƐ͘ ZĞƐƉĞĐƚĨƵůůǇ͕ John Kelly 3ODQQHU,,, Zoning Division – Zoning Services Section Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples Florida 34104 Phone: 239.252.5719 Fax: 239.252.6363 Email: John.Kelly@colliercountyfl.gov 7HOOXVKRZZHDUHGRLQJE\WDNLQJRXU=RQLQJ'LYLVLRQ6XUYH\DWŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬďŝƚ͘ůǇͬŽůůŝĞƌŽŶŝŶŐ ƐŝǌĞсϮǁŝĚƚŚсΗϭϬϬйΗĂůŝŐŶсĐĞŶƚĞƌх 8QGHU)ORULGD/DZHPDLODGGUHVVHVDUHSXEOLFUHFRUGV,I\RXGRQRWZDQW\RXUHPDLODGGUHVVUHOHDVHG LQUHVSRQVHWRDSXEOLFUHFRUGVUHTXHVWGRQRWVHQGHOHFWURQLFPDLOWRWKLVHQWLW\,QVWHDGFRQWDFWWKLV RIILFHE\WHOHSKRQHRULQZULWLQJ 3.A.h Packet Pg. 35 Attachment: Attachment G - VA-PL20230009299 and BD-PL20220006082 - Sign Posting (27321 : PL20230009299 VA 267 3rd Street West - 3.A.h Packet Pg. 36 Attachment: Attachment G - VA-PL20230009299 and BD-PL20220006082 - Sign Posting (27321 : PL20230009299 VA 267 3rd Street West - 12/14/2023 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Hearing Examiner Item Number: 3.B Doc ID: 27322 Item Summary: Petition No. BDE-PL20220006082 – 267 3rd Street West - Request for an 18-foot boat dock extension from the maximum permitted protrusion of 20 feet allowed by Section 5.03.06.E.1 of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) for waterways greater than 100 feet in width, to allow a boat docking facility protruding a total of 38 feet into a waterway that is 125± feet wide, for a proposed dock facility within a Resi dential Single-Family-4 (RSF-4) zoning district. The subject property is located at 267 3rd Street West, also described as Lot 2, Block G, Little Hickory Shores, Unit 3 Replat subdivision, in Section 5, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (Coordinator: John Kelly, Planner III) (Companion Item #PL20230009299) (Commissioner District 2) Meeting Date: 12/14/2023 Prepared by: Title: Planner – Zoning Name: John Kelly 11/22/2023 4:55 PM Submitted by: Title: Zoning Director – Zoning Name: Mike Bosi 11/22/2023 4:55 PM Approved By: Review: Growth Management Community Development Department Diane Lynch Department review Skipped 11/28/2023 5:38 PM Operations & Regulatory Management Michael Stark Review Item Completed 11/28/2023 5:43 PM Hearing Examiner (GMD Approvers) Diane Lynch Review Item Completed 11/28/2023 6:26 PM Zoning Diane Lynch Review Item Skipped 11/28/2023 5:38 PM Zoning Ray Bellows Review Item Completed 11/29/2023 1:25 PM Zoning James Sabo Review Item Skipped 11/29/2023 5:15 PM Zoning Mike Bosi Division Director Completed 12/01/2023 1:08 PM Hearing Examiner Andrew Dickman Meeting Pending 12/14/2023 9:00 AM 3.B Packet Pg. 37 BD-PL20220006082 – 2678 3rd St W, Lot 2 Page 1 of 8 November 27, 2023 STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FROM: ZONING DIVISION – ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: DECEMBER 14, 2023 SUBJECT: BD-PL20220006082; 267 3RD STREET WEST – WINGFELDER DOCK COMPANION TO VA-PL20230009299 _________________________________________________________________________ PROPERTY OWNER/APPLICANT: AGENT: Bradley P. and Sharon A. Wingfelder Nick Pearson 5412 Planter’s Wood Ct. Bayshore Marine Consulting, LLC Mississauga, Ontario 2025 Monroe Ave. Canada L5M5V6 Naples, FL 34112 REQUESTED ACTION: The petitioner requests an 18-foot boat dock extension from the maximum permitted protrusion of 20 feet allowed by Section 5.03.06.E.1 of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) for waterways greater than 100 feet in width to allow a boat docking facility protruding a total of 38 feet into a waterway that is 125± feet wide, for the benefit of the subject property. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is located at 267 3rd Street West and is legally described as Lot 2, Block G, Replat of Little Hickory Shores Unit 3, in Section 5, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (See location map on the following page) PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The subject property is an unimproved 0.01-acre parcel located within a Residential Single Family- 4 (RSF-4) zoning district, commonly referred to as a “boat dock lot.” The parcel is too small to accommodate the minimum square-foot house and setback requirements of the zoning district, as was acknowledged by the Board of County Commissioners when they approved a Provisional Use permitting docks without a principal use on property described as: “Lots 1 through 23, Block G, Little Hickory Shores, Unit #3, as recorded in Plat Book 6, Page 2, Official Records of Collier County, Florida.” See Resolution No. 1987-260, related to Petition No. PU-87-17C, (Continued on Page 4) 3.B.a Packet Pg. 38 Attachment: BD-PL20220006082 Staff Report 11272023 (27322 : PL20220006082 BD 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder Dock) BD-PL20220006082 – 2678 3rd St W, Lot 2 Page 2 of 8 November 27, 2023 3.B.aPacket Pg. 39Attachment: BD-PL20220006082 Staff Report 11272023 (27322 : PL20220006082 BD 267 3rd Street West - BD-PL20220006082 – 2678 3rd St W, Lot 2 Page 3 of 8 November 27, 2023 SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: North: Little Hickory Bay then a preserve for Little Hickory Bay Condominium located within the Little Hickory Bay PUD South: 3rd Street West (Right-of-Way) then a boat launch area in a RSF-4 zoning district East: Unimproved boat dock lot in a Residential Single-Family-4 (RSF-4) zoning district West: Boat dock facility in a Residential Single-Family-4 (RSF-4) zoning district Collier County GIS Collier County GIS 3.B.a Packet Pg. 40 Attachment: BD-PL20220006082 Staff Report 11272023 (27322 : PL20220006082 BD 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder Dock) BD-PL20220006082 – 2678 3rd St W, Lot 2 Page 4 of 8 November 27, 2023 PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT (Continued from Page 1) The petitioner desires to construct a new boat docking facility with two slips, each with a boat lift, upon the presently unimproved property. Two boat slips are typical for the boat dock lots in this area. The BDE is required to allow the proposed dock to extend 18 feet beyond the maximum of 20 feet allowed by LDC Section 5.03.06.E.2 for a total protrusion of 38 feet into a waterway that is 125± feet wide. Said extension request is driven by the limited amount of shoreline available to design a dock facility for the size of vessels proposed to use the facility, a 38-foot vessel and two personal watercraft (PWC). A companion variance petition, VA-PL20230009299, must also be approved for the proposed facility to allow for reduced side yard / riparian setbacks. ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION: Environmental Planning Staff has reviewed this petition and has no objection to granting this request. The proposed docking facilities will be constructed waterward of the existing seawalled shoreline. The shoreline does not contain native vegetation. A submerged resources survey provided by the applicant found no submerged resources in the area 200 feet beyond the proposed docking facility. Exhibit sheet 3 of 3 provides an aerial with a note stating that no seagrasses were observed within 200 feet. This project does not require an Environmental Advisory Council Board (EAC) review because this project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Chapter 2, Article VIII, Division 23, Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. STAFF ANALYSIS: In accordance with LDC Section 5.03.06.H., the Collier County Hearing Examiner shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny a dock facility extension request based on certain criteria. In order for the Hearing Examiner to approve this request, at least four of the five primary criteria and four of the six secondary criteria must be met: Primary Criteria: 1. Whether the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate in relation to the waterfront length, location, upland land use, and zoning of the subject property. Consideration should be made of property on unbridged barrier islands, where vessels are the primary means of transportation to and from the property. (The number should be appropriate; typical single-family use should be no more than two slips; typical multi-family use should be one slip per dwelling unit; in the case of unbridged barrier island docks, additional slips may be appropriate.) Criterion met. The subject property has been approved for residential dock facilities by means of Resolution No. 1987-260; therefore, this criterion allows up to two slips. The proposed dock facility comprises a finger pier with two slips, one for a vessel and the other for two PWCs. 3.B.a Packet Pg. 41 Attachment: BD-PL20220006082 Staff Report 11272023 (27322 : PL20220006082 BD 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder Dock) BD-PL20220006082 – 2678 3rd St W, Lot 2 Page 5 of 8 November 27, 2023 2. Whether the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the general length, type, and draft as that described in the petitioner’s application is unable to launch or moor at mean low tide (MLT). (The petitioner’s application and survey should establish that the water depth is too shallow to allow launching and mooring of the vessel(s) described without an extension.) Criterion met. The applicant’s agent states: “Most boatlifts vary between 10’ and 15’ in length and width on the lift pile centers. If a lift of this general size were installed inside the 29’ protrusion limit per Collier County’s LDC (ignoring the fact that there is no reasonable way to fit the vessel proposed inside the riparian lines and normal protrusion limit), then this lift would be placed in approximately 3 to 4’ of water at low tide. Subtracting approximately 2’ of that depth (required for the lift’s bunks and cradle) would leave approximately 1 to 2’ of water for the larger proposed vessel to operate in. This depth is insufficient to float the 38’ Length Overall (LOA) vessel proposed, as most vessels of this size require 2 to 3’ of water above the lift to launch.” Staff notes that the 38-foot vessel can’t be moored parallel to shore given the lot width; additionally, without altering the seawall, Cross-Sections AA and BB (Plans Sheets 04 and 05, reveal water depth issues at MLT. 3. Whether the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation within an adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. (The facility should not intrude into any marked or charted navigable channel, thus impeding vessel traffic in the channel.) Criterion met. There is no navigable channel at or adjacent to the proposed project location. Therefore, no marked or navigable channels will be affected by the proposed project. 4. Whether the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25 percent of the width of the waterway and whether a minimum of 50 percent of the waterway width between dock facilities on either side is maintained for navigability. (The facility should maintain the required percentages.) Criterion not met. The applicant’s agent states: “The waterway at this location is 125’ wide at its narrowest location. The applicant proposes a dock and vessel that will protrude 38’ into the waterway from the face of seawall/MHWL. This protrusion amounts to 30% of the waterway width, which means that this criterion is automatically not met. However, the opposite shoreline appears not to be buildable as it has been placed within a preserve. Therefore, we can safely assume that all 87’ of the remaining waterway will be left for navigation, which accounts for 70% of the waterway…” Staff concurs that this criterion is only partially satisfied; a minimum of 50 percent of the waterway width is maintained for navigation. 5. Whether the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the facility would not interfere with the use of neighboring docks. (The facility should not interfere with the use of legally permitted neighboring docks.) 3.B.a Packet Pg. 42 Attachment: BD-PL20220006082 Staff Report 11272023 (27322 : PL20220006082 BD 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder Dock) BD-PL20220006082 – 2678 3rd St W, Lot 2 Page 6 of 8 November 27, 2023 Criterion met. The applicant’s agent states: “This dock facility is oriented in the same direction as all other docks along this portion of the waterway, which is in a shore-normal configuration. Neither the proposed side setbacks nor the proposed protrusion is atypical for the area, and no neighboring docks should be affected by this project.” Staff notes that all of the boat dock lots along the subject shoreline have been constructed to be perpendicular to the shoreline; thus, the proposed dock facility will not interfere with the use of neighboring docks any more than existing docks impact the petitioner. staff, therefore, concurs. Secondary Criteria: 1. Whether there are special conditions not involving water depth related to the subject property or waterway that justify the proposed dock facility's proposed dimensions and location. (There must be at least one special condition related to the property; these may include type of shoreline reinforcement, shoreline configuration, mangrove growth, or seagrass beds.) Criterion met. The applicant’s agent states: The parcel on which the proposed project is located is an unconventional-sized lot that is too small for a principal structure to be located and is intended essentially exclusively for the use of boat mooring. The lot is also too narrow (especially when considering the standard 7.5’ side setbacks from both riparian lines) to reasonably moor a boat in a shore parallel configuration, which all but requires mooring in a shore-normal configuration. A shore normal configuration within the standard protrusion limit per Collier County’s LDC would limit the property owner to mooring boats of 20’ LOA or less, which would severely restrict the overall and intended use of the lot. Furthermore, nearly all of the adjacent boat slip lots already have docks with similar configurations, protrusions, and provided side setbacks.” Staff doesn’t disagree and adds that Resolution 1987-260, which approved specified lots for boat dock use, is a special condition. Additionally, of the boat dock lots, this and the adjoining lot to the east are the only ones with a seawall and are not a natural mangrove shoreline. 2. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe access to the vessel for loading/unloading and routine maintenance without the use of excessive deck area not directly related to these functions. (The facility should not use excessive deck area. Criterion met. The applicant’s agent states: “The proposed facility will utilize only a 3’ by 43’ long area of decking which totals 127 total square feet. This width is the minimum recommended safe width for a finger dock, and the length is required to provide access to the larger vessel adequately. Furthermore, most all other docks in the area utilize a larger area of decking than that proposed in this project.” Staff notes that the dock was reduced in length to 38 feet during the review phase; therefore, the accurate measurement is 3 feet by 38 feet and 114 square feet. Staff concurs that there is no excessive decking and that a 3-foot width should be adequate to allow for safe access and routine maintenance. 3. For single-family dock facilities, whether the length of the vessel or vessels in combination, described by the petitioner, exceeds 50 percent of the subject property’s 3.B.a Packet Pg. 43 Attachment: BD-PL20220006082 Staff Report 11272023 (27322 : PL20220006082 BD 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder Dock) BD-PL20220006082 – 2678 3rd St W, Lot 2 Page 7 of 8 November 27, 2023 linear waterfront footage. (The applicable maximum percentage should be maintained.) Criterion not met. The applicant’s agent states: “In order to meet this criteria [SIC], the applicant would need to propose mooring of only a single vessel of 15’ LOA or less, which would be, in our opinion, excessively restrictive for the site’s intended use. The length of all vessels proposed (40’ and 12’) in this petition together do exceed 50% of the property’s 30’ of shoreline.” Staff concurs and further notes that the subject property is legally nonconforming with respect to both lot area and lot width. Additionally, the previously proposed 40 foot vessel was reduced to 38 feet LOA during the review phase of this petition. 4. Whether the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view of neighboring property owners. (The facility should not have a major impact on the view of a neighboring property owner.) Criterion met. The applicant’s agent states: “The proposed dock configuration will be in line with the other docking facilities on the street per exhibit 07 of o8 [See Attachment A]. Additionally, the use of the facility for private recreational purposes will be consistent with the surrounding area as well. Therefore, the proposed project should not constitute a major impact on the view of the neighbors. Staff concurs. 5. Whether the proposed dock facility will impact seagrass beds. (If seagrass beds are present, compliance with subsection 5.03.06.J of the LDC must be demonstrated.) Criterion met. The applicant’s agent states: “There are no seagrass beds present in a 200’ area surrounding the subject property, so no seagrasses are expected as a result of the proposed project. Given the information provided within the provided Submerged Resources Survey, staff concurs. 6. Whether the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of subsection 5.03.06(E)(11) of this Code. (If applicable, compliance with section 5.03.06(E)(11) must be demonstrated.) Criterion is not applicable. The applicant’s agent states: “Section 5.03.06 of Collier County’s Land Development Code (LDC) stipulates that ‘multi-slip docking facilities with ten or more slips will be reviewed for consistency with the Manatee Protection Plan (MPP).’ The proposed project is for a private, recreational 2-slip dock associated with a single-family zoned lot in Little Hickory Shores. The proposed facility does not have more than ten slips, and so is not subject to review for consistency with Collier County’s MPP. Staff concurs. Staff analysis finds this request complies with four of the five Primary Criteria and four of the six Secondary Criteria, with the sixth criterion being not applicable. CONCURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS: 3.B.a Packet Pg. 44 Attachment: BD-PL20220006082 Staff Report 11272023 (27322 : PL20220006082 BD 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder Dock) BD-PL20220006082 – 2678 3rd St W, Lot 2 Page 8 of 8 November 27, 2023 Companion Petition No. VA-PL20230009299, to reduce the minimum side yard / riparian setback from 7.5 feet to zero on both sides of the proposed boat dock facility. APPEAL OF BOAT DOCK EXTENSION: As to any boat dock extension petition upon which the Hearing Examiner takes action, an aggrieved petitioner may appeal such final action. Such appeal shall be filed per Section 2-88 of the Collier County Code of Ordinances within 30 days of the Decision by the Hearing Examiner. An aggrieved non-party may appeal a decision of the Hearing Examiner to the Circuit Court of Collier County within 30 days of the decision. In the event that the Hearing Examiner has approved the petition, the applicant shall be advised that he/she proceed with construction at his/her own risk during this 30-day period. Any construction work completed ahead of the approval authorization shall be at their own risk. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Based on the above findings, Staff recommends that the Hearing Examiner approve Petition BD- PL20220006082 in accordance with the plans contained within Attachment A, most specifically that identified as sheet 03 of 08 (Proposed Dock), subject to the following conditions: 1. Approval is predicated upon the approval of the companion Variance, VA- PL20230009299, by the Hearing Examiner; absent such approval, this BD is void. 2. Prior to or concurrent with obtaining a building permit for the dock, a Right-of-Way permit shall be obtained for access improvements to prevent roadway and drainage system damage if not previously obtained (As Per Resolution 1987-260). 3. This dock is private in nature and shall not be used for rental purposes. 4. This dock shall not be used for any commercial purposes, including mooring commercial boats. Attachments: A. Dock Facility Plans B. Map of Boundary Survey C. Resolution 1987-260 D. Zoning Maps E. Applicant’s Backup; Application, Narrative, Authorizations, etc. F. Public Hearing Sign Posting 3.B.a Packet Pg. 45 Attachment: BD-PL20220006082 Staff Report 11272023 (27322 : PL20220006082 BD 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder Dock) STATE OF FLORIDACOUNTY AERIAL VICINITY MAPSTATE OF FLORIDACOUNTY AERIAL VICINITY MAPNOTES:<> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SUBJECTPROPERTYSUBJECTPROPERTY<> LATITUDE:N 26.327090<> LONGITUDE:W -81.831033SITE ADDRESS:<> 267 3RD ST W #2 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:P:\22141.00 Wingfelder - 267 3rd St W Unit 2\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\22141-BDE-2.0.dwg LOCATION MAP 9/8/2023THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875NPRMJ05-05-2322141-0525267 3RD ST W #2LOCATION MAP48-------------------01 OF 08COLLIER COUNTYCOLLIER COUNTYGULF OF MEXICOGULF OF MEXICO8588288641MARCOISLANDEVERGLADESCITY9329846NAPLES90908399483783784129292983983992887846951862I-758486431856850846890896NESWKEY WESTTAMPAFT.MYERSMIAMINAPLESSUBJECTPROPERTY3.B.bPacket Pg. 46Attachment: Attachment A - Dock Facility Plans (27322 : PL20220006082 BD 267 3rd Street West - 8.1'7.8'7.4'5.1'4.4'5.4'3.2'3.9'4.3'3.2'2.8'2.2'NESW0102040SCALE IN FEETSITE ADDRESS:,Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:P:\22141.00 Wingfelder - 267 3rd St W Unit 2\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\22141-BDE-2.0.dwg EXISTING CONDITIONS 9/8/2023THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875NPRMJ05-05-2322141-0525267 3RD ST W #2EXISTING CONDITIONS48-------------------02 OF 08·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOTINTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.·ALL WATER DEPTHS AND DREDGE ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO MLW·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF):·EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX):·TIDAL DATUM:··MHW (NAVD)=··MLW (NAVD)=NOTES:"BENCHMARK LAND SERVICES, INC."01-23-23-0.55'+0.01'30'0125'EXISTINGSEAWALLPROPERTYBOUNDARYRIPARIANLINERIPARIANLINE30'52'57'29'267 3RD ST W #2BONITA SPRINGSFL34134WATERDEPTHSAT MLW30'19'12'20' STANDARDPROTRUSION LIMITPER COLLIERCOUNTY LDC3.B.bPacket Pg. 47Attachment: Attachment A - Dock Facility Plans (27322 : PL20220006082 BD 267 3rd Street West - 8.1'7.8'7.4'5.1'4.4'5.4'3.2'3.9'4.3'3.2'2.8'2.2'P:\22141.00 Wingfelder - 267 3rd St W Unit 2\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\22141-BDE-2.0.dwg 9/8/2023NESW051020SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:P:\22141.00 Wingfelder - 267 3rd St W Unit 2\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\22141-BDE-2.0.dwg PROPOSED DOCK 9/8/2023THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875NPRMJ05-05-2322141-0525267 3RD ST W #2PROPOSED DOCK48-------------------03 OF 08·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOTINTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.·ALL WATER DEPTHS AND DREDGE ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO MLW·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF):·EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX):·TIDAL DATUM:··MHW (NAVD)=··MLW (NAVD)=NOTES:·PROPOSED OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·TOTAL OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM MHWL:"BENCHMARK LAND SERVICES, INC."01-23-23-0.55'+0.01'30'0125'10710738'14'EXISTINGSEAWALLPROPERTYBOUNDARYPROPOSED14'X14' BOATLIFTPROPOSED10'X12' BOATLIFT3'PROPOSEDFIXEDFINGER PIER38' PROTRUSION10'12'AA04BB0538'14'0' SIDESETBACK0' SIDESETBACKSTANDARD 20'PROTRUSIONLIMIT FORCOLLIER COUNTY30'3.B.bPacket Pg. 48Attachment: Attachment A - Dock Facility Plans (27322 : PL20220006082 BD 267 3rd Street West - 02510SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:P:\22141.00 Wingfelder - 267 3rd St W Unit 2\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\22141-BDE-2.0.dwg CROSS SECTION AA 9/8/2023THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875NPRMJ05-05-2322141-0525267 3RD ST W #2CROSS SECTION AA48-------------------04 OF 08EXISTINGSEAWALLFIXEDDOCKMHW = +0.01' NAVDMLW = -0.55' NAVDSTRINGERCAP TIMBERALL PILES TO BEWRAPPED FROM 12"ABOVE MHWL TO 6"BELOW SUBSTRATE38' PROTRUSION38' VESSEL ON SLIGHT ANGLE7.8'5.4'3.9'2.8'DEPTHSAT MLWSTANDARD 20'PROTRUSIONLIMIT FORCOLLIER COUNTY4' 2' OF WATER REQ. FOR LIFT CRADLE AND BUNKS 2' OF WATER REQ. FOR FLOATATION DECKINGVESSEL AND LIFT DEPICTEDAPPROXIMATELY AT LOWTIDEPROPOSEDBOATLIFTLIFT BUNKSAND CRADLE3.B.bPacket Pg. 49Attachment: Attachment A - Dock Facility Plans (27322 : PL20220006082 BD 267 3rd Street West - 0248SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:P:\22141.00 Wingfelder - 267 3rd St W Unit 2\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\22141-BDE-2.0.dwg CROSS SECTION BB 9/8/2023THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875NPRMJ05-05-2322141-0525267 3RD ST W #2CROSS SECTION BB48-------------------05 OF 08FIXEDDOCK10' BOAT LIFTMHW = +0.01' NAVDMLW = -0.55' NAVDSTRINGERCAP TIMBERALL PILES TO BEWRAPPED FROM 12"ABOVE MHWL TO 6"BELOW SUBSTRATE3'14' BOAT LIFTAPPRX. 6' OF WATERAT MLW AT 38' FROMSHORE0' SIDE SETBACK0' SIDESETBACK4' OF DEPTH REQ. FORLAUNCHINGVESSEL 6'VESSEL AND LIFT DEPICTEDAPPROXIMATELY AT LOWTIDE LAUNCHING HEIGHTLIFT BUNKSAND CRADLE3.B.bPacket Pg. 50Attachment: Attachment A - Dock Facility Plans (27322 : PL20220006082 BD 267 3rd Street West - P:\22141.00 Wingfelder - 267 3rd St W Unit 2\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\22141-BDE-2.0.dwg 9/8/2023NESW0204080SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:P:\22141.00 Wingfelder - 267 3rd St W Unit 2\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\22141-BDE-2.0.dwg SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY 9/8/2023THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875NPRMJ05-05-2322141-0525267 3RD ST W #2SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY48-------------------06 OF 08PROPERTYBOUNDARY120'200'TYPICAL DIVE TRANSECTNO SEAGRASSES WEREOBSERVED GROWINGWITHIN 200 FT OF THEPROPOSED PROJECTTRANSECT10'MANGROVESHORLINE3.B.bPacket Pg. 51Attachment: Attachment A - Dock Facility Plans (27322 : PL20220006082 BD 267 3rd Street West - P:\22141.00 Wingfelder - 267 3rd St W Unit 2\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\22141-BDE-2.0.dwg 9/8/2023NESW03060120SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:P:\22141.00 Wingfelder - 267 3rd St W Unit 2\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\22141-BDE-2.0.dwg ADJACENT DOCKS 9/8/2023THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875NPRMJ05-05-2322141-0525267 3RD ST W #2ADJACENT DOCKS48-------------------07 OF 08PROPERTYBOUNDARY48'55'51'38'38'38'NOTE:THE DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATEAND ARE TAKEN FROM THE AERIAL IMAGE.38'132'134'3.B.bPacket Pg. 52Attachment: Attachment A - Dock Facility Plans (27322 : PL20220006082 BD 267 3rd Street West - P:\22141.00 Wingfelder - 267 3rd St W Unit 2\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\22141-BDE-2.0.dwg 9/8/2023NESW0204080SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:P:\22141.00 Wingfelder - 267 3rd St W Unit 2\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\22141-BDE-2.0.dwg WIDTH OF WATERWAY 9/8/2023THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875NPRMJ05-05-2322141-0525267 3RD ST W #2WIDTH OF WATERWAY48-------------------08 OF 08PROPERTYBOUNDARY125'38'145'96' OF NAVIGABLESPACE REMAININGNOTE:THE DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATEAND ARE TAKEN FROM THE AERIAL IMAGE.132'3.B.bPacket Pg. 53Attachment: Attachment A - Dock Facility Plans (27322 : PL20220006082 BD 267 3rd Street West - 1 inch = 20' ft. GRAPHIC SCALE LAND SERVICES, INC. ENCHMARKB Kenneth Sarrio Digitally signed by Kenneth Sarrio Date: 2023.03.13 11:33:27 -04'00' 3.B.c Packet Pg. 54 Attachment: Attachment B - Map of Boundary Survey (27322 : PL20220006082 BD 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder Dock) Ini), HHl ' ~;j OCTOBER 27, 1987 Ite.'7Bl USOLU'1'IOlf 87-210, PBTITIOlf 110-87-17C, COJOl1l1fITY DIVBLOPHBlCT DIVISIOII UQt1BSTIBCJ .ROVISIOlfAL UBI "1\" OP m1I asP-4 DISTRICT POR MOlf-COHKIRCIAL BOAT LAUHCRI}~ PACILITIES - ADOPTED Planner Weeks stated the property is located approximately 1/4 mile south of Bonita Beach Road, and 3/4 mile ~eBt of Vanderbilt Drive in the Littl., Hickory Shores Subdivision. He stated that the Board directed staff to initiate a Provisional Use for this property beca- use of the small lot size which cannot be used for a principal struc- ture. He said it appears that these lots were intended for boat' " dock lots, however, that is not indicated on the plat. Mr. Weeks stated the rr,PC has reviewed this petition and forwarded it with 8'reeommendation of approval. He said correspondence on this petition was received, with six letters in favor and one in oppositiort. He noted the letter of op~osition was due to misinformation and after clarification by Staff, the objection was verbally withdrawn. Staff teeommends approval. In;re.pon.e to Chairman Hasse, planning/Zoning Director McKim stated .the docks are for private use only, however, renting of boat' docks is a problem throughout the County. She explained that Staff only becomes aware of this type of violation if there is a complaint. co..issioner .istor moved, seconded by commissioner Goodnight and oarried unenimously, that Resolution 87-260, .etition 'U-87-17C, for non-co~eroial boat launohing faoillties for property looated approximately 1/4 mile south of Bonite Beaoh Road and 3/4 mil. .est of Vanderbilt Driv., be adopted. n.),; q r'-'1, prr.q -,11'.1J, i; j ~ t I' c:~t!~ !b r 3.B.d Packet Pg. 55 Attachment: Attachment C - Resolution 1987-260 (27322 : PL20220006082 BD 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder Dock) RESOLOTIOII 87- ~O OCT 271987 REUTlNG TO PI:TITlON 110. PU-87-17C FOR PROVISIONAL USI! OF PROPERTY IIEREINAFTER DESCRIBED IN COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA. WHEREAS. tho LoShll.turo of tho St.to of Florido in Ch.ptor 67...1246, Lav. of Florid... and Chapter 125, Florida Statut.., h.. conferred Oft Collier CoUlJty the power to .at.bIt_h, coordinate and. 1'DI!orcI 1001nl and' .uch bu.inl.' rl.ulation. a. ar. uc....ry for thu prot.ction of tha pubU.c; and lREllEAS, Th. CoUDty purauant thlrlto ha. adoptld a eo.pr.han.lv. Zoning Ordinlncl ..tlbU.bins rlsulationa for the zonins of particullr I.llsr.phie divialona of the County. allOnl which 1a the Irautina of prllvi81on.al n.a.; and WHEREAS. the Colli.. County Pl.nnins eo..t..ion, beinl the duly pl,ointod .nd conotitutod platlninl bo.rd for tho .r.. horoby .ffoctld. hall b.ld . pubil.c h....i.n. .ftar Dotic. al in .aid r.gulat10111 ..d. Ind pt'lTf'ld.d. and ba. couaid.r.d the advlubl1ity of Proviliona1 U.. "a" in I lSF-4 zona for the prop4lrty harelnafter de.cribed. and baa found II a uttar of fact (Exhibit "A") tbat satilfaetary prCTf'illan and arrAngement ba. baen ..de eoncernlnl all applicabla ..ttlr. rlquirld by aid ra.ulation. and in 'lccordancl with Section 13 - 1d of thl ZoniDI Rogulation. for tho Collio.. County Pl.nDins eo-i..ionl .nd W'RER.!AS. all intlrllll:ld plrtil. ha". baln si"ln opportunity to be h..rd by thia Bo.rd in public ..otinl ......blod .nd tho Bo.rd ,,"viDl coneidar.d all _tt.r. pre:lantld. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED. BY THE BOARD or ZOlIIRG APPEALS of ColIior County, Florid. th.t tho potition of Co.ouDity Dovolop..nt 01"i.ioo. repra..ntiq tM 50ard 'Jf County Coadaaionerl, rith rllpect to the proparty herlinaftlr d.lcrib.d a.: loti 1 through 23, Block "en. Little Hickory Shore.. Unlt 13. II rlcorded in P~lt Book 6, PI.e 2. Official R.cord. of Collior County 1m lU9 Fl~l 27 3.B.d Packet Pg. 56 Attachment: Attachment C - Resolution 1987-260 (27322 : PL20220006082 BD 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder Dock) I""" 109fl'ot 28 l..'" b. and i:,\ I, OCT 271987 the .... i. hareby approved for Pt'ovl11onal U.. "a" of the ISr-4 lonlna diltrict for Non-t::o...rclal BOlt Lnunchlng Facf lit i.. t aubj.~t to tho follov1ns conditionl' a.At tial of obtaicinl a dock pl.-it, I risht-of-vay porait shall b. obtained Ind the owner ,hall provide Ree... iaprov...ntl to prevlnt daus_ to the rOldway and roadwlY drainlSI laprov...ntl. b. All boat doclta aractad on thl lubjoct lota ..ot cOllply with Section 8.46 of tho Zonins Ordinanco (82-2). BE IT FURTlIEIl RESOLVED that tbia raloluUon bl racordad in tha aioutal of thia acard. eo-i..loner offorad tha forlsoina rOlolutionPlator nd 8OVod itl adoption. ..condod by eoa.iaaionor C"'.nMl"d c:1hfo and upon roll call, the vote va.: AlESI Commissioners Pistor, Goodnight, Glass, Saunders and Hasse NATS I None AIlSEIIT AlID lOT VOTING. Ilone AIlSTEIlTIOII: None Ilcm. tbia 27th OCtober 1987.day of IOAlD or Z0II111G APPEALS COLL~' FLOlIDA" ~ ST. a IlAltA. SIt.J"'~ t\',\o/?la" Attta't, JAII!S"Cl. GILES. CLItRX BY'~-::"""")y~....5 vfr~ Magn, ~ty Clerk APPlllVED AS TO FOIlK A/lD LEGAL ~lJFFICIEJlCYI a ~,*..~ R. IlUCE I OM ASSISTAIIT COU1ITT ATTOlUIET PU-87-I7C ....olution 3.B.d Packet Pg. 57 Attachment: Attachment C - Resolution 1987-260 (27322 : PL20220006082 BD 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder Dock) OCT 271987 EXIIIIIIT A FIIIDIlIO OF FACT BT COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A PROVISIONAL USE PETITION FOR PU-87-17C The followina facti ar. founds 1. Saction 7. I lb. ) ) (.) prntaloGa 1 u... of the Zoning OrdinancI authorized the 2. Grantina the prov1aionaI u.o viII not adv.r..ly affoct tha public inter.at and viII not adyer..ly .ffact othlr property or u... In the .... d1atrict or nailbborhood bICIU.. of: A. Caneral complianc. with the Comprahenlivl Plan: Compll.. with Comprehlnlivl Plan Tn..&.. No_ B. Ingr... and ISr... to prop.rty and propo..d structural thereon with particular raflrlncl to automotive Ind ped.ltri.D ..laty and convlniencl, traffic flow and control. and ace... in c... of fira or cata.trophl: Ad.qu.t~nlr... , aar... T.I -Z::.- Ko_ c. Affectl nlighbor101 proplrtie. in relation to noi.., alarl, economic or odor Iffectl: No .ff.ct or Affoct mitis.tod by Afflct cannot be _itig.ted D. Conaral compatibility vith adjacent proportio. and othor proporty in tho diotrict. Compatiblo uoa vithin diatrict Too ')( No _ I...d on the above flDd1nsa, this provisional use . stipulations, (copy attachld) (.k9~lA Mft~) b. rae DATE. /~/i7 I nID1IIll OF FACT FOIII oo~ JL()l}Pl~[ ~!} 3.B.d Packet Pg. 58 Attachment: Attachment C - Resolution 1987-260 (27322 : PL20220006082 BD 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder Dock) LAST REVISION: ZONING ___________________ OTHER ___________________SUBDIVISON INDEX ATTEST___________________________CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA TWP 48S RNG 25E SEC(S) 5 NO 1/2 MAP NUMBER: BY___________________________CHAIRMAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISION HICKORYLITTLE 1050'S59D27'W PUD 10 THIRD STREET WESTLELYBAREFOOTBEACH N89D44'W-2000.11' PUD18,19,20,21,25,68,82,91,96,107 A 5 8 1400' 9 5 7930"5 6 11,95BD 10 11 12 LITTLE HICKORY BAY N0D36'W-2555.33'2 3 4 1 15 F 13 14 16Pu"a "5 2 4 NON-STSTST PARCEL 5A59.55AC BAY5030,RMF-16 400'260'5 960' 18 32 22211920181614131512 WEST AVENUEFOREST AVENUEVANDERBILT DRIVE (CR901)22 DOLPHIN COVE COURTRSF-3 AUDUBON COUNTRY CLUB 6 28 SIXTH STREET WEST PUD232'19184 NON-ST 6 ST BD17 16 BD 15 14,42 20 15 14 8 1310BD 9 6 7 6 21 22 17BD 23 24 13 12 11 10 2625 27 E 9 8 7 E 7 116 6 2 21 20 1,2,9,31,34,46,101 5 4 8 2 1 6 4 29 30 31 5 4 3 32 33 2 1 4 6 5 9 8 3 2 18 12 10 1 SIXTH STREET 109 8 7 11 6 5 17 1110 1312 1413 4 3 15 2 1 15 14 1716 EIGHTH STREET SEVENTH STREET 19 5 4 31 124 23 3 2 13 12 2322 21 2524 20 19 15 14 11 10WEST17 16 9 8 29EAST 28 27 26 7 30 30 14 2726 18 17 2928 16 15 32 12 2031 13 34 33 11 10 21 RMF-12 25 24 23 22 1920 18 17 2 SIXTH STREET LAKEVIEW11 393635 9 8 3837 7 6 3 40 5 4 41 2 1 16 15 13 14 12 11 10 98 7 6 10 5 4 12 4 21 C-3 7 5 6 9 8 4 3DRIVE 1110 2 1 C-1 1312 3 2 1 3 17 12 5 2 1 11 22 5 20 5 23 24 RSF-4 22FIRST STREET RMF-6 HICKORY HARBOR CONDOMINIUM SECOND STREET B THIRD STREET 23 4 3 5 3 25 5 3 3V 24 4 3 3 4 6.4' S 3 0 D 3 3 " E350'2122 1 20 1819 32 4 5 24 23 1 2 22 21 20 19 43 65 7 6 FIFTH ST WEST RMF-12 5 34 12 D 6 D 1 2 4 3 FIFTH STREET 9 8 7 6 109 1211 5 4 16 3 2 14 13 15 1615 8 7 6 5 1514 13 12 1716 11 10 4 3 2 1 20 1918 9 8 217 9 141617 C 15 6 7 C 8 1213 10 11 10 151817 B 16 87 9 1314 11 12 1413 12 11 1615 10 9 18 17 8 7 19 6 6 V 1615 14 13 1817 12 11 20 2221 19 10 9 8 7 3 C-431.2 1.1 25 24 2.22 3 2223 A 2021 4 5 A 6 7 LEE COUNTYBONITA BEACH ROAD (CR 865) 11 16181917 8 9 10 15 14 12 13 3 1 1716 15 14 1918 13 12 23 22 9 2120 11 10 8 7 2 V 7 39 16 37 16 35 16 2 1 27 17181920222325242126 33 30 DRIVEDRIVEVALLEY1 20 19 14 22 21 VALLEY6 5 4 3 23 2423 4 3 25 2 1 28 29 38 SHOREWOODSCONDOMINIUM35 34 37 36 Lot 1 13 FOURTH STREET 39 31 32 3433 35 36 3837 28 25 26 25 VALLEY DRIVE242221 4 23 3 2 1 27 26 27 2 2524 6 5 26 4 3 28 1 THIRD STREET 29 30 2324 3231 22 21 35 18 33 34 20 19 36 17 SECOND STREET 27 28 2324 29 30 22 21 33 18 31 32 1920 34 17 12356478910111215 48 FIFTH STREET 9 8 7 6 5 4 1011 9 8 1312 1514 3 2 41 40 43428 11 10 9 8 4544 4746 9 3 20 67 10 45 18 17 16 19 12C-32221 576 4 3 5049 5251 2 1 2 5453 1 46 7 44 7 14 13 39 38 15 14 4140 1213 5 4342 11 10 4544 89 37 36 1415 3938 13 12 4 424140 1011 43 89 4847 6 5 5049 34 5251 12 4645 56 4847 4 3 5049 12 33 16 2625 6 5 2827 4 3 ,23,8116V 3029 2 1 FIRST STREET 2625 24 23 2827 22 21 31 18 3029 20 19 32 17 42 7C-4 36 35 34 15 14 37 13 12 1 403938 11 10 41 9 8 4443 6 5 45 4 3 2 1 1 5 G BD ,V26,99 1234567891011121314151617181920212223 1234567891011H 27BD V28 29BD 1 GULFWAYCONDO HICKORY BAY WEST 32V BD33 BD35 36BD37CU BD38 CU 39 40BD 41BD BD43 44BD BD45 47BDBD48 49BD BD50 C U 5 1 BD52 BD53 BD54 55V BD56 58V 57V BD59 60BD 3 61BD CU62 BD63 BD64 V 65 66BD BD67 BD12 V 6 BD69 BD70 BD71 BD72 BD73 BD74 75BDBD76 BD77 V7879,104 105BD , V BD80 83BD 84BD 85,86BD BD 87 88BD 89BD90BD BD92BD93 BD,V 94 BD97 98V 100 V ,BD102103 BD106 108BD BD109 $NO. NAME P.B. Pg.1 BONITA SHORES NO.1 3 12 BONITA SHORES NO.2 3 433 LITTLE HICKORY SHORES NO.1 3 64 LITTLE HICKORY SHORES NO.2 3 795 LITTLE HICKORY SHORES NO.3 (REPLAT) 6 26 DOLPHIN COVE 19 55-56 INDICATES SPECIAL TREATMENT OVERLAY 8505N 8505S8506N LEE COUNTY1The Historic/Archaeological Probability Maps are the officialCounty source designating historic or archaeologic resources.ZONING NOTES1 R-82-11-C2 R-87-12C3 V-88-12 88-282456 3-11-97 V-96-33 97-1657 11-19-85 V-85-28C 85-2418 6-25-91 R-91-4 91-549 6-25-91 PUD-87-12(1) 91-5310 LDC-9111 3-5-92 BD-92-1 92-412 8-6-98 BD-98-28 98-3213 12-17-92 BD-92-9 92-2914 5-20-93 BD-93-5 93-1515 5-20-93 BD-93-6 93-1416 11-23-93 V-93-29 93-54817 12-2-93 BD-93-20 93-3718 PDA-85-1,2C19 PDA-86-17C20 PDA-86-18C21 8-2-88 PDA-88-7 88-6322 1-25-94 V-93-34 94-3623 3-8-94 V-94-1 94-15824 10-27-87 PU-87-17C 87-26025 5-24-94 PUD-77-19(6) 94-2826 6-15-95 BD-95-6 95-1927 9-7-95 BD-95-13 95-3128 9-12-95 V-95-12 95-53329 11-2-95 BD-95-18 95-4730 12-12-95 R-95-8 95-7531 1-9-96 PUD-82-11(3) 96-132 9-10-96 V-96-16 96-41933 10-3-96 BD-96-15 96-3534 11-12-96 PUD-82-11(4) 96-6935 12-5-96 BD-96-22 96-4636 12-19-96 BD-96-23 96-4737 1-14-97 CU-96-22 97-5038 4-3-97 BD-97-3 97-1239 4-22-97 CU-97-6 97-22340 5-15-97 BD-97-11 97-1841 7-3-97 BD-97-16 97-3242 9-4-97 BD-97-17 97-3643 6-4-98 BD-98-10 98-2044 5-21-98 BD-98-20 98-2545 9-17-98 BD-98-30 98-3946 9-17-98 PDI-98-4 8-3847 11-5-98 BD-98-32 98-4648 11-5-98 BD-98-34 98-4749 12-17-98 BD-98-38 98-5550 12-3-98 BD-98-36 98-5351 5-11-99 CU-99-4 99-23652 6-3-99 BD-99-8 99-2253 8-19-99 BD-99-16 99-3054 8-5-99 BD-99-12 99-2855 10-26-99 V-99-13 99-40056 1-20-00 BD-99-26 00-0157 2-8-00 V-99-26 00-5158 3-14-00 V-99-27 00-8559 2-17-00 BD-99-28 00-0360 5-4-00 BD-00-9 00-561 6-1-00 BD-00-8 00-1662 5-23-00 CU-00-1 00-15763 7-20-00 BD-00-13 00-1964 9-7-00 BD-00-18 00-2565 10-10-00 V-00-18 00-35366 11-16-00 BD-00-26 00-3467 5-3-01 BD-01-AR-351 01-0968 6-26-01 PUDA-01-AR-546 01-3569 10-4-01 BD-01-AR-1122 01-2570 4-4-02 BD-01-AR-1608 02-0371 9-5-02 BD-02-AR-2416 02-0672 9-16-02 BD-02-AR-2564 02-0573 12-19-02 BD-02-AR-3019 02-1074 2-5-04 BD-03-AR-4689 04-0275 7-15-04 BD-04-AR-5697 04-0876 7-15-04 BD-04-AR-5699 04-0777 7-15-04 BD-04-AR-5693 04-0678 5-24-05 V-04-AR-6970 05-21379 5-5-05 BD-05-AR-7155 05-0680 11-17-05 BD-05-AR-7970 05-1081 4-25-06 V-05-AR-8857 06-10882 5-23-06 PUDZ-04-AR-6283 06-2283 4-19-07 BD-06-AR-10900 07-0484 5-17-07 BD-06-AR-11004 07-0585 12-6-07 BD-07-AR-12154 07-0886 4-22-08 ADA-07-AR-12714 08-11987 11-22-08 BD-08-AR-13305 08-0588 5-6-10 BD-PL-09-918 10-0289 12-2-10 BD-PL-10-1297 10-0690 2-3-11 BD-PL-10-1313 11-0191 2-22-11 PUDA-PL-09-742 11-0492 9-6-12 BD-PL-12-26 12-0793 10-6-11 BD-PL-10-1473 11-0694 7-20-16 VA-PL-15-2429 AND BD-PL-15-37 HEX-16-2595 12-20-17 BD-PL-16-541 HEX-17-3596 9-11-18 PUDA-PL-17-4421 18-4197 1-18-19 BDE-PL-17-2736 HEX 19-0298 2-21-19 VA-PL-18-2673 HEX 19-0899 1-29-20 BDE-PL-18-3700 HEX 20-02100 1-29-20 VA-PL-17-1588 HEX 20-03101 1-28-20 PUDA-PL-19-502 20-07102 7-14-20 VA-PL-19-2360 20-128103 6-11-20 BDE-PL-19-1962 CCPC 20-02104 6-8-21 BDE-PL-20-2151 HEX 21-17105 6-8-21 VA-PL-20-2152 HEX 21-18106 9-24-21 BD-PL-20-1106 HEX-21-40107 5-12-22 PDI-PL-21-2729 HEX 22-22108 3-10-23 BD-PL-22-501 HEX 23-04109 8-9-23 BDE-PL-20-1107 HEX 23-23DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS MODIFICATIONS12-12-95 R-95-B 95-75THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A PAGE OF THEOFFICIAL ZONING ATLAS REFERRED TO AND ADOPTEDBY REFERENCE BY ORDINANCE NO. 04-41 OF THECOUNTY OF COLLIER, FLORIDA, ADOPTED JUNE 22, 2004,AS AMENDED BY THE ZONING NOTES AND SUBDIVISIONINDEX REFERENCED HEREON. 0 400 SCALE9/18/20233.B.e Packet Pg. 59 Attachment: Attachment D - Zoning Map_8505n (27322 : PL20220006082 BD 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder Dock) rCounty � - Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1036 I Email: GMDClientServices@colliercountyfl.gov www.colliercountyfl.gov Boat Dock Facility Extension OR Boathouse Establishment Petition Land Development Code Section 5.03.06 Chapter 3 B of the Administrative Code THIS PETITION IS FOR (check one): 0 DOCK EXTENSION □BOATHOUSE APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of Property Owner(s): Bradley and Sharon Wingfelder Name of Applicant if different than owner: ________________________ _ Address: 5412 Planter's Wood Ct. CityMISSISSAUGUA State:..Q!:ii ZIP: L5M5V6 Telephone: _______________ _ Cell: ________________ _ E-Mail Address: ---------------------------------- Name of Agent: Nick Pearson ---------------------------------- Firm: Bayshore Marine Consulting, LLC Address: 20 25 Monroe Ave. Telephone: 23 9-404-7982 City: Naples Cell: E-Mail Address: Nick@Bayshore MarineConsulting.com PROPERTY LOCATION State: FL ZIP: 34112 Section/Township/Range•_5 __ ; 48 S / 25 E Property I.D. Number: _5 _60_0_0_7_20_0_0_4 ________ _ Subdivision: Little Hickory Shores Unit: 3 Lot: 2 Block: G --- Address/ General Location of Subject Property: 267 3RD ST W, Bonita Springs FL 34134 / 0.23 miles south of Bonita Beach Rd. and 0.2 4 miles west of West Ave. Current Zoning and Land use of Subject Property: RSF-4 / vacant 03/2023 Page 1 of7 3.B.f Packet Pg. 60 Attachment: Attachment E - Applicant's Backup - PL20220006082 (27322 : PL20220006082 BD 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder Dock) rCounty � - Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1036 I Email: GMDClientServices@colliercountyfl.gov www.colliercountyfl.gov BE AWARE THAT COLLIER COUNTY HAS LOBBYIST REGULATIONS. GUIDE YOURSELF ACCORDINGLY AND ENSURE THAT YOU ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THESE REGULATIONS. ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE Zoning Land Use N N/A open water s RSF-4 vacant except for boat dockage E RSF-4 vacant w RSF-4 vacant except for boat dockage DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Narrative description of project (indicate extent of work, new dock, replacement, addition to existing facility, any other pertinent information): See attached narrative SITE INFORMATION 1.Water Width:---125 ft. Measurement from: D plat 0 survey D visual estimate ___ ft. other (specify) 2.Total Property Water Frontage: 3.Setbacks: 30 ft. Provided: o ft.---Required: 7_5 ft. 4.Total Protrusion of Proposed Facility into Water: 38 5.Number and Lengths of Vessels to Use Facitlity: 1._3_8 __ ft. 2.12 ft. 6.If applicable, the distance between dock facilities per the Land Development Code section 5.03.06 H.1.d. ft. --- 7.List any additional dock facilities in close proximity to the subject property and indicate the total protrusion into the waterway of each: There is one dock facility to the west that is oriented also in a shore-normal configuration. This facility appears to protrude approximately 33' into the waterway from the estimated MHWL. 03/2023 Page 2 of7 3.B.f Packet Pg. 61 Attachment: Attachment E - Applicant's Backup - PL20220006082 (27322 : PL20220006082 BD 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder Dock) er County � - Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1036 I Email: GMDClientServices@colliercountyfl.gov www.colliercountyfl.gov 8.Signs are required to be posted for all petitions. On properties that are one (1) acre or larger in size, the applicant shall be responsible for erecting the required sign. What is the size of the petitioned property? .04 Acres 9.Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? D Yes I ✓ I No (If yes, please provide copies.) DOCK EXTENSION PRIMARY CRITERIA The following criteria, pursuant to LDC section 5.03.06, shall be used as a guide by staff in determining its recommendation to the Office of the Hearing Examiner. The Hearing Examiner will utilize the following criteria as a guide in the decision to approve or deny a particular Dock Extension request. In order for the Hearing Examiner to approve the request, it must be determined that at least 4 of the 5 primary criteria, and at least 4 of the 6 secondary criteria, must be met. On separate sheets, please provide a narrative response to the listed criteria and/or questions. 1.Whether or not the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate in relation to the waterfront length, location, upland land use, and zoning of the subject property; consideration should be made of property on unbridged barrier islands, where vessels are the primary means of transportation to and from the property. (The number should be appropriate; typical, single-family use should be no more than two slips; typical multi-family use should be one slip per dwelling unit; in the case of unbridged barrier island docks, additional slips may be appropriate.) 2.Whether or not the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the general length, type, and draft as that described in the petitioner's application is unable to launch or moor at mean low tide (MLT). (The petitioner's application and survey should show that the water depth is too shallow to allow launch and mooring of the vessel(s) described without an extension.) 3.Whether or not the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation within an adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. (The facility should not intrude into any marked or charted navigable channel thus impeding vessel traffic in the channel.) 4.Whether or not the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25% of the width of the waterway, and whether or not a minimum of 50% of the waterway width between dock facilities on either side of the waterway is maintained for navigability. (The facility should maintain the required percentages.) s.Whether or not the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the facility would not interfere with the use of neighboring docks. (The facility should not interfere with the use of legally permitted neighboring docks.) 03/2023 Page 3 of7 3.B.f Packet Pg. 62 Attachment: Attachment E - Applicant's Backup - PL20220006082 (27322 : PL20220006082 BD 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder Dock) er County � -Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1036 I Email: GMDClientServices@colliercountyfl.gov www.colliercountyfl.gov DOCK EXTENSION SECONDARY CRITERIA 1.Whether or not there are special conditions, not involving water depth, related to the subject property or waterway, which justify the proposed dimensions and location of the proposed dock facility. (There must be at least one special condition related to the property; these may include type of shoreline reinforcement, shoreline configuration, mangrove growth, or seagrass beds.) 2.Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe, access to the vessel for loading/ unloading and routine maintenance, without the use of excessive deck area not directly related to these functions. (The facility should not use excessive deck area.) 3.For single-family dock facilities, whether or not the length of the vessel, or vessels in combination, described by the petitioner exceeds 50 percent of the subject property's linear waterfront footage.(The applicable maximum percentage should be maintained.) 4.Whether or not the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view of neighboring waterfront property owners. (The facility should not have a major impact on the view of either property owner.) 5.Whether or not seagrass beds are located within 200 feet of the proposed dock facility. (If seagrass beds are present, compliance with LDC subsection 5.03.06 J must be demonstrated.) 6.Whether or not the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of LDC subsection 5.03.06 E.11. (If applicable, compliance with subsection 5.03.06.E.ll must be demonstrated.) BOATHOUSE CRITERIA The following criteria, pursuant to LDC section 5.03.06 F, shall be used as a guide by staff in determining its recommendation to the decision maker. The decision maker will utilize the following criteria as a guide in the decision to approve or deny a particular Boathouse request. In order for the request to be approved, all of the criteria must be met. On separate sheets, please provide a narrative response to the listed criteria and/or questions. 1.Minimum side setback requirement: Fifteen feet. 2.Maximum protrusion into waterway: Twenty-five percent of canal width or 20 feet, whichever is less. The roof alone may overhang no more than 3 feet into the waterway beyond the maximum protrusion and/or side setbacks. 3.Maximum height; Fifteen feet as measured from the top of the seawall or bank, whichever is more restrictive, to the peak or highest elevation of the roof. 4.Maximum number of boathouses and covered structures per site: One. 5.All boathouses and covered structures shall be completely open on all 4 sides. 6.Roofing material and roof color shall be the same as materials and colors used on principal structure or may be a palm frond "chickee" style. A single-family dwelling unit must ve constructed on the subject lot prior to, or simultaneously with, the construction of any boathouse or covered dock structure. 7.The boathouse or covered structure must be so located as to minimize the impact on the view of the adjacent neighbors to the gratest extent practical. 03/2023 Page 4 of 7 3.B.f Packet Pg. 63 Attachment: Attachment E - Applicant's Backup - PL20220006082 (27322 : PL20220006082 BD 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder Dock) Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1036 I Email: GMDClientServices@colliercountyfl.gov www.colliercountyfl.gov ASSOCIATIONS Complete the following for all registered Home Owner/ Civic Association(s) that could be affected by this petition and located within 1,000 feet of the subject property. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Civic Associations and Communities page on the Board of County Commissioner's website. Applicant is responsible for and shall confirm the current mailing addresses for each association as registered by the Florida Department of State, Division of Corporations. Name of Homeowner/ Civic Association: Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP: Name of Homeowner / Civic Association: Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP: Name of Homeowner / Civic Association: Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP: Name of Homeowner/ Civic Association: Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP: Name of Homeowner/ Civic Association: Mailing Address: City: tate: ____,ZIP: 03/2023 Page 5 of7 3.B.f Packet Pg. 64 Attachment: Attachment E - Applicant's Backup - PL20220006082 (27322 : PL20220006082 BD 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder Dock) 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net (239} 252-2400 FAX: (239} 252-6358 Pre-Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: � Dock Extension D Boathouse Chapter 3 B. of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement Checklist is to be utilized during the Pre-Application Meeting, and at time of application submittal. At time of submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. #OF NOT REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW COPIES REQUIRED REQUIRED Completed Application (download current form from County website) 1 � □ ProQert� OwnershiQ Disclosure Form 1 � LJ Signed and Sealed Survey 1 I.Y □ Chart of Site Waterway 1 D g-- Site Plan Illustration with the following: •Lot dimensions;•Required setbacks for the dock facility;•Cross section showing relation to MHW/MLW and shoreline (bank, seawall, or rip-rap revetment);□ •Configuration, location, and dimensions of existing and proposed 1 facility; •Water depth where proposed dock facility is to be located;•Distance of navigable channel;•Illustration of the contour of the property; and•Illustration of dock facility from both an aerial and side view . Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 1 � □ ComQleted Addressing Checklist 1 � □ Electronic copy of all required documents *Please be advised: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all 1 � □ materials to be submitted electronically in PDF format. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: •Following the completion of the review process by County review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. •Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. May 8, 2018 Page 5 of 6 3.B.f Packet Pg. 65 Attachment: Attachment E - Applicant's Backup - PL20220006082 (27322 : PL20220006082 BD 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder Dock) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239)252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 PLANNERS-INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: □ Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment: □ Historical Review Executive Director □ Addressing: Annis Maxam □ Parks and Recreation: David Berra □ City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director □ School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart □ Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Johnson [2f Other: � .,11 ��E,\!)�□ Emergency Management: Dan Summers; and/or □ Other: EMS: Artie Bay FEE REQUIREMENTS: CY Boat Dock Extension Petition: $1,500.00 e:(' Estimated Legal Advertising fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner: $1,125.00 � An additional fee for property owner notifications will be billed to the applicant prior to the Hearing Examiner hearing date. Fire Code Plans Review Fees are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: ii/62_ Signature of Petitioner or Agent May 8, 2018 Growth Management Department Planning and Regulation ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 7/17/23 Date Page 6 of 6 3.B.f Packet Pg. 66 Attachment: Attachment E - Applicant's Backup - PL20220006082 (27322 : PL20220006082 BD 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder Dock) Growth Management Community Development Department ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following and upload via the CityView Portal with your submittal. Items marked with (*) are required for every application, other items are optional and may not apply to every project. Forms are valid for 6 months following their submittal; an updated form will be required for a new submittal after that timeframe and any time the properties within the project boundary are modified. Additional documents may be attached to this form and can include: *LOCATION MAP and/or SURVEY showing the proposed project boundary. List of additional folio numbers and associated legal descriptions. E-mail from Addressing Official for any pre-approved project and/or street names. LOCATION INFORMATION *FOLIO (Property ID} Number(s) of subject property or properties. [Attach list if necessary] 56000720004 *LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties. [Attach list if necessary] LITTLE HICKORY SHORES UNIT 3 REPLAT BLK G LOT 2 STREET ADDRESS(ES} where applicable, if already assigned. 267 3RD ST W, Unit 2, Bonita Springs FL 34134 PROJECT INFORMATION Acceptance of this form does not constitute project and/or street name approval and is subject to further review by the Addressing Official. Pre-Approval may be requested by contacting us at GMD Addressing@colliercountyfl.gov or 239-252-2482 prior to your submittal. CURRENT PROJECT NAME PROPOSED PROJECT NAME Wingfelder BDE -267 3rd St W PROPOSED STREET NAME(s) LATEST APPROVED PROJECT NUMBER [e.g., SDP-94-##, PPL-2002-AR-####, PL2017000####] Addressing Checklist (Rev 10/2022) Operations & Regulatory Management Division• 2800 North Horseshoe Drive• Naples, FL 34104 • 239-252-2400 www.colliercountyfl.gov Page 1 of 1 3.B.f Packet Pg. 67 Attachment: Attachment E - Applicant's Backup - PL20220006082 (27322 : PL20220006082 BD 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder Dock) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239)252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a.If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: Name and Address % of Ownership Bradley and Sharon Wingfelder 100 b.If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address % of Ownership c.If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest: Name and Address % of Ownership Created 9/28/2017 Page 1 of 3 3.B.f Packet Pg. 68 Attachment: Attachment E - Applicant's Backup - PL20220006082 (27322 : PL20220006082 BD 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder Dock) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239)252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 d.If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners: Name and Address % of Ownership e.If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners: Name and Address % of Ownership Date of Contract: ----- f.If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust: Name and Address g.Date subject property acquired ______ _ D Leased: Term of lease _____ years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Created 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 3 3.B.f Packet Pg. 69 Attachment: Attachment E - Applicant's Backup - PL20220006082 (27322 : PL20220006082 BD 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder Dock) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239)252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Date of option: ___________ _ Date option terminates: ________ _, or Anticipated closing date: ______ _ AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form. Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest-holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition's final public hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Agent/Owner Signature Nick Pearson Agent/Owner Name (please print) Created 9/28/2017 Growth Management Department ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 7/17/2023 Date Page 3 of 3 3.B.f Packet Pg. 70 Attachment: Attachment E - Applicant's Backup - PL20220006082 (27322 : PL20220006082 BD 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder Dock) DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA DOC@.70 $525.00 REC $18.50 CONS $75,000.00 7s; C5lfl5;dD This lnstrumentPrepared by & return to: Name: Nancy Drexler Hensley, an employee of Palm Title Associates, Inc. Address: 1591 Hayley Lane, Suite 102 Fort Myers FL 33907 File ��::{;l'i:/80-NHOR Parcel I.D. #: 560007��',, SPACE ABOVE TE;is £1/lii'ol RocEss1No DATA SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDING DATA , , � .,::c:,;.._ ��·c,-/' '\, �, ,.,.' ·' ·,;i,. THIS WARRANTY:,J>EED Made the J(jh day of May, A.D. 2017, by JAMES J. NAIVE and JENNIFER L. NAIVE, husband,:f!,�t{fi.j;, hereinafter called the grantors, to BRADLEY PAUL WINGFELDER and SHARON ANN WINGFELDEll:/us�'!.!!,� and wife, whose post office address is 5412 Planter's Wood Ct, Mississaugua, Ontario Canada L5M5Vff'�rfer called the grantees: (Wherever used herein the terms "g1•diii:J�§Pii " '(f'antees" include all the parties to this instrument, singular and plural, the heirs, legal representatives q • • _n1 Sf.._individuals, and the successors and assigns of corporations, wherever the context so admits or req • . " .;>,; ,.''\Witnesseth: That the grantors, for °''iifi'/l�,!h;:d' _nsideration of the sum of $10. 00 and other valuableconsideration, receipt whereof is hereby acknowle¥. , �reby grant, bargain, sell, alien, remise, release, convey and confirm unto the grantees �ll that. certain lands· t�:�e �ounty, State of Florida, viz: Lot 2, Block G, Re�lat of Little Htck�ry Shores um(?<��ng to plat thereof as recorded m Plat Book 6,Page 2, of the Pubhc Records of Colher County, Flo�,,,)':d\ SUBJECT TO TAXES FOR THE YEAR 2017 A;� . 'EQUENT YEARS, RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS, COVENANTS AND EASEMENTS OF RE;r(>. . .'.. 'f ANY. _T�gether with all the tenements, hereditaments and ��u_·_;�;�es thereto belonging or in anywise appertammg. ",-,<y To Have and to Hold the same in fee simple forever. /':(�;'> And the grantors hereby covenant with said grantees that they are lqJ.t'fylJJ�eited of said land in fee simple; that they ha�e good right and lawfu_l authority to sell _and convey said land, and( �('e····. e'lyy. ':'f1! .. ·· l .. ly war'.a . nt the_ title to. saidland and will defend the same against the lawfal claims of all persons whomsoe,.y��"!!,at said land is free of all. encumbrances, except taxes accruing subsequent to December 31, 2016. ";; �:)·\ tf' {� 3.B.f Packet Pg. 71 Attachment: Attachment E - Applicant's Backup - PL20220006082 (27322 : PL20220006082 BD 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder Dock) In Witness Whereof, the said grantors have signed and sealed these presents, the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: Jen9::ztrv'f1 �L.S. Address: Printed Name 7803 Rollington Road, Pewee Valley, KY 40056 vvt(A � ,2on, or who �ve produced NOTARY SEAL 3.B.f Packet Pg. 72 Attachment: Attachment E - Applicant's Backup - PL20220006082 (27322 : PL20220006082 BD 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder Dock) AFFIDAVIT OF AUTH ORIZATIO N FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) _.!'.PU022oooeoa2 ��and�P��--------------- _e-;-,a_, -".v:-:w:-:-, _,o:-•--:I�--------(print nam e) as _____________ title. 1r applicable) of::-::---:-:---::-:-------===-----==-- (compa ny, l�hcable), swear or affinnunder oath, that I am the (choose one) owne rw appllcantQ ontra ct purchas erL_Jand that *Notes 2 3 4 5 I have full author ity lo secure the approval(s) r equested and to impose c ovenants and restrictions onthe referenc ed proper1 y as a result or any acllon ap proved by the Coun ty in accordance with thisapplication and the Land Development Code All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, da ta or other sup plementa ry matter attached hereto and made a par1 or this application are hones t and true, I haJe authonzed the staff of Collier County t o enter upon the proper1y during norm al working hoursfort 1e purpose of investrga!lng and evaluallng the request made through t his apphcalion, and thatThe prope r1y will be transferred conveyed. sold or subd1v1ded subject to lhe cond1tIons and restnctrons imposed by the approved actron We/I authorize NockPea,son lo act as our/my representallve in any matters regarding thrs petition including 1 through 2 above •If the applicant is a corporation, then it 1s usually executed by the corp pres or v pres •If 1/ie applicant 1s a Limrted L1a/J/11ty Company (LL C) or Limited Company (LC). then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's ·Managing Member • • If the applicant is a partnersl11p , then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership •If tl1e apphcant 1s a /1m1ted partnership, I/Jen the general partner must sign and be 1dent,fied as the •general partner' of the named partnership •If the applicant is a trust. then they must include the trustee's name and the words ·as trustee ·• • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e g, indJVidua/, corporate , trust. partnership, and tllen use tile appropriate format for that ownership Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that !he 7W -J-Mw�1-.:..2.....::....,.3r-=fu=-Z._3 _ �gnature l Date STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF CO LIER The foregoing instr ment was acknowleged before me b y means of �ys1cal presence or Oonhne no anzauon this 1:!z_ day of � . 201:.2, by (printed name of owner or qualifier) _._,.,._,.,;_w_'"•-'"-"'"--------- Such person(s) Notary Public must check applicable bo 0 Are personally �s produced nown to me / I nc.1 9 7c;,_ �o I vOcurrent drivers license W 4'-i 'b -Q 0 Has produced -1--------- ( l'IIIS-'() \--0111 I:, 15 IU- \ -1 2020 Shahzad Ahmed Quadri Notary Commission #69209Q Ontario, Canada 3.B.f Packet Pg. 73 Attachment: Attachment E - Applicant's Backup - PL20220006082 (27322 : PL20220006082 BD 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder Dock) AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) �<20�220000J��:w�ana�P1��!__ _____________ _ --:----:--:-=---:----------<Pnnl name) as _____________ (title, 1fapphcable) of --:---:---------==---==---(company 1�11cable) swear or affirm under oath that I am the (choose one) owner0 applicant Qontract purchaseruand thal I have full authority to secure the approval(s} requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this applicallon and the Land Development Code 2 All answers to the questions in this appltcallon and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this apphcallon are honest and true, 3 I have authonzed the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property dunng normal working hours for he purpose of 1nvest1gat1ng and evaluating the request made through this application, and lhal 4 The property will be transferred, conveyed sold or subd1v1ded sub1ect to the cond11lons and restrictions imposed by the approved action 5 We/I authonze "" .. '"'°" lo act as our/my represen alive 1n any matters regarding this petrt1on including 1 through 2 above 'Notes •If the applicant 1s a corpora/ton, then 1/ ts usually executed by the corp pres or v pres •If the applicant ts a Limited Liability Company (LL C) or Limited Company (L C) then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's ·Managing Member •If the appltcant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership •If the applicant ,s a /Jm1ted partnership, then the general partner must sign and be 1denhfied as the •general partner" of the named partnership •ff the applicant is a trust then they must include the trustee·s name and the words ·as trustee· •In each mstance. first determme the app/tcant's status e g tndlVldual corporate trust partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affld vit of Authorization and that ]"' stated ;n • a STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing ms rumen! was acknowleg d before me by means of �ys1cal presence or Oonline no nzatIon his ?,-Z, day of MLu.\ 201.,� by (printed name of own r or qualifier) _,._.,0_0w._ .. _&1•_I•_" _________ _ Such person(s) Notary Public must check applicable box D Are personally known to me �s produced a current drivers license w4 y '.& � .. ]o "hi"' -b <3 ° 3 D Has produced--- : -�----)-,,...)_ as Id nt1ficat1on Notary Signature ___ ___, /�..-�-t-t-�...------------ < I' II C ·o \-1111115 I!\.� RI\ J � .112ll Shahzad Ahmed Quadri Notary Commission #69209Q Ontario, Canada 3.B.f Packet Pg. 74 Attachment: Attachment E - Applicant's Backup - PL20220006082 (27322 : PL20220006082 BD 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder Dock) rd rd 3.B.f Packet Pg. 75 Attachment: Attachment E - Applicant's Backup - PL20220006082 (27322 : PL20220006082 BD 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder Dock) 3.B.f Packet Pg. 76 Attachment: Attachment E - Applicant's Backup - PL20220006082 (27322 : PL20220006082 BD 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder Dock) 3.B.f Packet Pg. 77 Attachment: Attachment E - Applicant's Backup - PL20220006082 (27322 : PL20220006082 BD 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder Dock) 3.B.f Packet Pg. 78 Attachment: Attachment E - Applicant's Backup - PL20220006082 (27322 : PL20220006082 BD 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder Dock) 3.B.f Packet Pg. 79 Attachment: Attachment E - Applicant's Backup - PL20220006082 (27322 : PL20220006082 BD 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder Dock) 3.B.f Packet Pg. 80 Attachment: Attachment E - Applicant's Backup - PL20220006082 (27322 : PL20220006082 BD 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder Dock) 3.B.f Packet Pg. 81 Attachment: Attachment E - Applicant's Backup - PL20220006082 (27322 : PL20220006082 BD 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder Dock) 3.B.f Packet Pg. 82 Attachment: Attachment E - Applicant's Backup - PL20220006082 (27322 : PL20220006082 BD 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder Dock) 3.B.f Packet Pg. 83 Attachment: Attachment E - Applicant's Backup - PL20220006082 (27322 : PL20220006082 BD 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder Dock) 3.B.f Packet Pg. 84 Attachment: Attachment E - Applicant's Backup - PL20220006082 (27322 : PL20220006082 BD 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder Dock) 3.B.f Packet Pg. 85 Attachment: Attachment E - Applicant's Backup - PL20220006082 (27322 : PL20220006082 BD 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder Dock) 3.B.f Packet Pg. 86 Attachment: Attachment E - Applicant's Backup - PL20220006082 (27322 : PL20220006082 BD 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder Dock) 3.B.f Packet Pg. 87 Attachment: Attachment E - Applicant's Backup - PL20220006082 (27322 : PL20220006082 BD 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder Dock) 3.B.f Packet Pg. 88 Attachment: Attachment E - Applicant's Backup - PL20220006082 (27322 : PL20220006082 BD 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder Dock) 3.B.f Packet Pg. 89 Attachment: Attachment E - Applicant's Backup - PL20220006082 (27322 : PL20220006082 BD 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder Dock) 3.B.fPacket Pg. 90Attachment: Attachment E - Applicant's Backup - PL20220006082 (27322 : PL20220006082 BD 267 3rd 3.B.fPacket Pg. 91Attachment: Attachment E - Applicant's Backup - PL20220006082 (27322 : PL20220006082 BD 267 3rd 3.B.fPacket Pg. 92Attachment: Attachment E - Applicant's Backup - PL20220006082 (27322 : PL20220006082 BD 267 3rd 3.B.fPacket Pg. 93Attachment: Attachment E - Applicant's Backup - PL20220006082 (27322 : PL20220006082 BD 267 3rd 3.B.fPacket Pg. 94Attachment: Attachment E - Applicant's Backup - PL20220006082 (27322 : PL20220006082 BD 267 3rd 3.B.fPacket Pg. 95Attachment: Attachment E - Applicant's Backup - PL20220006082 (27322 : PL20220006082 BD 267 3rd 3.B.fPacket Pg. 96Attachment: Attachment E - Applicant's Backup - PL20220006082 (27322 : PL20220006082 BD 267 3rd 3.B.fPacket Pg. 97Attachment: Attachment E - Applicant's Backup - PL20220006082 (27322 : PL20220006082 BD 267 3rd 3.B.fPacket Pg. 98Attachment: Attachment E - Applicant's Backup - PL20220006082 (27322 : PL20220006082 BD 267 3rd 3.B.fPacket Pg. 99Attachment: Attachment E - Applicant's Backup - PL20220006082 (27322 : PL20220006082 BD 267 3rd 3.B.fPacket Pg. 100Attachment: Attachment E - Applicant's Backup - PL20220006082 (27322 : PL20220006082 BD 267 3rd 3.B.f Packet Pg. 101 Attachment: Attachment E - Applicant's Backup - PL20220006082 (27322 : PL20220006082 BD 267 3rd Street West - Wingfelder Dock) From: John Kelly Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2023 9:05 AM To: John Kelly Subject: VA-PL20230009299 and BD-PL20220006082 - 267 3rd Street West Lot 2 - Sign Posting Attachments: Posting 1.jpg; Posting 2.jpg I, John Kelly, personally posted a Public Hearing sign to the front of the subject location, immediately adjacent to the public right-of-way, at approximately 3:00 P.M. on Tuesday, November 28, 2023, for the 11/21/2023 meeting of the Hearing Examiner as evidenced by the attached photos. Respectfully, John Kelly Planner III Zoning Division – Zoning Services Section Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples Florida 34104 Phone: 239.252.5719 Fax: 239.252.6363 Email: John.Kelly@colliercountyfl.gov Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at http://bit.ly/CollierZoning size=2 width="100%" align=center> Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 3.B.g Packet Pg. 102 Attachment: Attachment F - VA-PL20230009299 and BD-PL20220006082 - Sign Posting (27322 : PL20220006082 BD 267 3rd Street West - 3.B.gPacket Pg. 103Attachment: Attachment F - VA-PL20230009299 and BD-PL20220006082 - Sign Posting (27322 : PL20220006082 BD 267 3rd Street West - 12/14/2023 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Hearing Examiner Item Number: 3.C Doc ID: 27336 Item Summary: Petition No. NUA- PL20230012731 – 1114 Palm Drive - Request for an alteration to a nonconforming use pursuant to Land Development Code Section 9.03.03 to allow for the replacement of a mobile home that will satisfy all other dimensional standards for principal structures within the Residential Single-Family- 4 (RSF-4) Zoning District, for property located at 1114 Palm Drive in Immokalee, in Section 32, Township 46 South, Range 29 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: John Kelly, Planner III] Commission District 5 Meeting Date: 12/14/2023 Prepared by: Title: Planner – Zoning Name: John Kelly 11/27/2023 8:25 AM Submitted by: Title: Zoning Director – Zoning Name: Mike Bosi 11/27/2023 8:25 AM Approved By: Review: Operations & Regulatory Management Michael Stark Review Item Completed 11/28/2023 5:37 PM Growth Management Community Development Department Diane Lynch Department review Completed 11/28/2023 7:09 PM Hearing Examiner (GMD Approvers) Diane Lynch Review Item Completed 11/28/2023 7:09 PM Zoning James Sabo Review Item Skipped 11/29/2023 5:17 PM Zoning Ray Bellows Review Item Completed 11/29/2023 5:19 PM Zoning Mike Bosi Division Director Completed 11/30/2023 10:41 AM Hearing Examiner Andrew Dickman Meeting Pending 12/14/2023 9:00 AM 3.C Packet Pg. 104 NUA-PL20230012731 – 1114 Palm Dr, Immokalee Page 1 of 6 November 22, 2023 STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION – ZONING SERVICES SECTION DATE: DECEMBER 14, 2023 SUBJECT: NUA-PL20230012731; 1114 PALM DRIVE, IMMOKALEE ______________________________________________________________________________ PROPERTY OWNER/APPLICANT: AGENT: Samuel M. Plunkett and Bethany Zajicek Gabriela Jauregui (deceased) Panda Permit 1114 Palm Dr. 18070 S. Tamiami Trl., Suite 12 Immokalee, FL 34142 Fort Myers, FL 23908 REQUESTED ACTION: The petitioner requests the Collier County Hearing Examiner approve a non-conforming use alteration (NUA) pursuant to LDC Section 9.03.03 to allow for the replacement of a legal nonconforming mobile home that will satisfy all dimensional standards within the Residential- Single-Family-4 (RSF-4) Zoning District. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is located at 1114 Palm Drive, on the east side of Palm Drive, approximately 420 feet north of Lake Trafford Road, in Section 3, Township 47 South, Range 29 East, Collier County, Florida. (See location map on page 2 and Complete Legal Description within Attachment A). PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The petitioner requests an NUA pursuant to LDC Section 9.03.03.B.4 to replace a legal nonconforming single-wide mobile home measuring 56 feet by 11.2 feet that Hurricane Irma destroyed with a new double-wide mobile home measuring 56 feet by 26.7 feet. The mobile home is legally nonconforming as it was placed when the property was within a zoning district that allowed for such until the property was rezoned in 1972. The new mobile home will satisfy all dimensional standards of the existing zoning district. The subject property is homesteaded and comprises 0.32 acres. 3.C.a Packet Pg. 105 Attachment: Staff Report 11222023 (27336 : PL20230012731 NUA 1114 Palm Drive, Immokalee - Plunkett / Jauregui) NUA-PL20230012731 – 1114 Palm Dr, Immokalee Page 2 of 6 November 22, 2023 SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: This section of the staff report identifies the land uses and zoning classifications for properties surrounding the subject property: North: Single-family dwelling within an RSF-4 Zoning District East: Single-family dwelling within an RSF-4 Zoning District South: Single-family dwelling within an RSF-4 Zoning District West: Palm Drive (Right-of-Way), then unimproved property in an RSF-4 Zoning District 3.C.a Packet Pg. 106 Attachment: Staff Report 11222023 (27336 : PL20230012731 NUA 1114 Palm Drive, Immokalee - Plunkett / Jauregui) NUA-PL20230012731 – 1114 Palm Dr, Immokalee Page 3 of 6 November 22, 2023 Collier County GIS GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: The subject property is within the Urban Mixed-Use District – High Residential Subdistrict (HR) of the Immokalee Area Master Plan (IAMP) Future Land Use Map of the GMP. Within the HR, mobile homes are allowed pursuant to the provisions of IAMP Policy 5.1.4, Mobile homes within the Immokalee Urban Area, which allows mobile homes on lots or parcels with zoning that permits mobile homes. Policy 5.1.6.C, which deals with existing uses at the time of implementation, specifically states: “This provision shall not apply to any legal nonconforming use of a property.” The IAMP does not address individual NUA requests but deals with the larger issue of the actual use. The requested NUA does not impact this property's consistency with the County's GMP. STAFF ANALYSIS: The applicant seeks to obtain an NUA to allow the replacement of a legal nonconforming single- wide mobile home measuring 56 feet by 11.2 feet that Hurricane Irma destroyed with a new double-wide mobile home measuring 56 feet by 26.7 feet. The subject property is located within a Residential Single-Family-4 (RSF-4) Zoning District that does not allow mobile homes as principal, conditional, or accessory uses. A Survey was provided that reveals the existing mobile 3.C.a Packet Pg. 107 Attachment: Staff Report 11222023 (27336 : PL20230012731 NUA 1114 Palm Drive, Immokalee - Plunkett / Jauregui) NUA-PL20230012731 – 1114 Palm Dr, Immokalee Page 4 of 6 November 22, 2023 home satisfies all dimensional standards of the RSF-4 Zoning District; additionally, a Site Plan was provided demonstrating that the new mobile home will also satisfy said dimensional standards. A building Permit for the demolition and removal of the existing mobile home, PRDM20220943714, has been issued. A building permit application, No. PRTM20230101296 has been submitted for the placement of the new mobile home; however, it remains under review pending the outcome of the subject NUA petition. Staff expended a significant amount of time researching the subject property to render the determination that the existing mobile home is/was legally nonconforming. Unfortunately, having exhausted all resources, staff was unable to locate the original building permit for the placement of said mobile home. Subsequently, a Property Card was obtained from the Property Appraiser’s Office, which reveals the subject property was first recognized in 1974, and the first referenced building permit was No. 80-4310 in 1981; further research yielded that this permit was issued for a mobile home re-roof. Staff notes that the Property Detail portion of the electronic Property Card reveals that a Mobile Home was recognized on the site in 1970. Staff proceeded to obtain archived Zoning Atlas pages, which reveal that the subject property was within an I-A-1 (Immokalee- Agricultural-1) Zoning District in the 1970s and a zoning action on 06/13/1972 rezoned the property to SF2 (Single-Family-2). Staff has determined that a mobile home was an allowable permitted use in 1970 until the property was rezoned in 1972. LDC Section 9.03.03.B, nonconforming structures, states, in part: “Where a structure lawfully exists at the effective date of the adoption of this ordinance or relevant amendment that could not be built under the LDC by reason of restrictions on lot area, lot coverage, height, yards, location on the lot, or requirements other than use concerning the structure, such structure may be continued so long as it remains otherwise lawful, subject to the following provisions:… 4. Nonconforming residential structures, which for the purpose of this section shall mean detached single-family dwellings, duplexes, or mobile homes in existence at the effective date of this zoning Code or its relevant amendment and in continuous residential use thereafter, may be altered, expanded, or replaced upon recommendation of the Collier County Planning Commission and approval of the Board of Zoning Appeals by resolution.” The Hearing Examiner has since been granted the authority, by ordinance, to hear and act on NUAs. As per LDC Section 4.02.01.A, Table 1, the minimum lot area within the RSF-4 Zoning District is 7,500 square feet, and the minimum lot width for interior lots is 70 feet. As per the provided Site Plan: the subject property measures 75 feet by 184 feet (13,800 square feet) and has a width of 75 feet. LDC Section 4.02.01.A, Table 2, states the maximum building height within the RSF- 4 district is 35 feet, and the minimum floor area of a 1-story building is 800 square feet. The provided Structural Elevation reveals the mobile home is 14.6 feet in height, and the provided Site Plan reveals the mobile home comprises 1,495.2 square feet. LDC Section 4.02.01.A, Table 2.1, provides the following setback standards for principal structures within the RSF-4 district: Front Yard – 25 feet, Side Yards (non-waterfront) – 7.5 feet, and Rear Yard – 25 feet. The provided Site Plan reveals the following: the proposed mobile home will be placed 106 feet from the western property line (Front Yard), 9.5 feet from both the north and south property lines (Side Yards) and 50.9 feet from the east property line (Rear Yard). Therefore, the subject property is code- compliant, and all dimensional standards for principal structures within the RSF-4 Zoning District are satisfied. 3.C.a Packet Pg. 108 Attachment: Staff Report 11222023 (27336 : PL20230012731 NUA 1114 Palm Drive, Immokalee - Plunkett / Jauregui) NUA-PL20230012731 – 1114 Palm Dr, Immokalee Page 5 of 6 November 22, 2023 The decision to grant an NUA is based on the criteria in LDC Section 9.03.03.B.5.a through f. (in bold font below). Staff has analyzed this petition relative to these provisions and offers the following responses: a. The alteration, expansion, or replacement will not increase the density of the parcel or lot on which the nonconforming single-family dwelling, duplex, or mobile home is located. The applicant desires to replace an existing mobile home that Hurricane Irma destroyed; said replacement will not increase the density of the lot. b. The alteration, expansion, or replacement will not exceed the building height requirements of the district most closely associated with the subject nonconforming use. The building height within the RSF-4 zoning district is 35 feet for principal structures; the provided Structural Elevation reveals the new mobile home is 14.6 feet in height; therefore, the building height requirement will not be exceeded. c. The alteration, expansion, or replacement will not further encroach upon any nonconforming setback. This petition, if approved, will not cause any encroachment issues. As per the provided Site Plan, the placement of the new mobile home will fully satisfy the yard requirements of the RSF-4 zoning district. d. The alteration, expansion, or replacement will not decrease or further decrease the existing parking areas for the structure. A reduction in parking requirements has neither been sought nor has any action regarding this issue been addressed as part of this petition. e. The alteration, expansion, or replacement will not damage the character or quality of the neighborhood in which it is located or hinder the proper future development of the surrounding properties; and Records obtained from the Property Appraiser’s Office reveal the existing mobile home has been in its present location since 1970. Replacing a storm-damaged mobile home will improve the character and quality of the neighborhood in which it is located without hindering the future development of surrounding properties. f. Such alteration, expansion, or replacement will not present a threat to the health, safety, or welfare of the community or its residents. The existing mobile is in a severely damaged condition; allowing for the replacement of said mobile home will reduce threats to health, safety, and welfare. 3.C.a Packet Pg. 109 Attachment: Staff Report 11222023 (27336 : PL20230012731 NUA 1114 Palm Drive, Immokalee - Plunkett / Jauregui) NUA-PL20230012731 – 1114 Palm Dr, Immokalee Page 6 of 6 November 22, 2023 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): A NIM is not required for a Nonconforming Use Alteration. CONCURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS: There are no concurrent land use applications under review at present. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Collier County Hearing Examiner (HEX) approve Petition NUA- PL20230012731 subject to the following conditions: 1. The scope of this NUA is limited to the replacement of an existing mobile home and 2. Building Permits must be issued for both the demolition of the existing mobile home and the placement of the new mobile home prior to the performance of such work. Attachments: A. Legal Description B. Structural Elevation and Site Plan C. Map of Boundary Survey D. Property Card E. Zoning Atlas – Current and Archived F. Public Hearing Sign Posting G. Applicant’s Application and Backup Material 3.C.a Packet Pg. 110 Attachment: Staff Report 11222023 (27336 : PL20230012731 NUA 1114 Palm Drive, Immokalee - Plunkett / Jauregui) LEGAL DESCRIPTION “The South 75.00 Feet of the West 184.00 Feet of the North 225.00 feet of the East 478.57 feet of the Southwest ¼ of the Southeast ¼ of the Northwest ¼ of section 32, Township 46 South, Range 29 East, Collier County, Florida” 3.C.b Packet Pg. 111 Attachment: Attachment A - Legal Description (27336 : PL20230012731 NUA 1114 Palm Drive, Immokalee - Plunkett / Jauregui) 3.C.cPacket Pg. 112Attachment: Attachment B - Structural Elevation and Site Plan (27336 : PL20230012731 NUA 1114 Palm 3.C.cPacket Pg. 113Attachment: Attachment B - Structural Elevation and Site Plan (27336 : PL20230012731 NUA 1114 Palm Drive, Immokalee - Plunkett / Jauregui) RICHARD A MIXONDigitally signed by RICHARD A MIXON Date: 2022.10.19 14:55:36 -04'00'3.C.dPacket Pg. 114Attachment: Attachment C - Map of Boundary Survey (27336 : PL20230012731 NUA 1114 Palm Drive, 3.C.e Packet Pg. 115 Attachment: Attachment D - Property Card (27336 : PL20230012731 NUA 1114 Palm Drive, Immokalee - Plunkett / Jauregui) 3.C.e Packet Pg. 116 Attachment: Attachment D - Property Card (27336 : PL20230012731 NUA 1114 Palm Drive, Immokalee - Plunkett / Jauregui) 3.C.e Packet Pg. 117 Attachment: Attachment D - Property Card (27336 : PL20230012731 NUA 1114 Palm Drive, Immokalee - Plunkett / Jauregui) 3.C.e Packet Pg. 118 Attachment: Attachment D - Property Card (27336 : PL20230012731 NUA 1114 Palm Drive, Immokalee - 3.C.e Packet Pg. 119 Attachment: Attachment D - Property Card (27336 : PL20230012731 NUA 1114 Palm Drive, Immokalee - 32133,51234567891011122423222120191817161514131110987654321131415161718192021221212222120191817161514131234567891011122221201918171615141312345678910111222212019181716151413123456789101112222120191817161514131234567891011123458910116713141516171819202122232412111098765432113141516171819202122232412111098765432112111098765432113141516171819202122232412111098765432113141516171819202122232412111098765432112111098765432112345676543217891011 121234123456789101112 13 1415 1617181920212223 24252627282930313132333435363738394041422324313233343536373839404142434445TRACT DTRACT CTRACT B12222123456789101112131415164TRACT ACARSON ROADEDEN AVENUEPLUM STREETPEAR STREETTANGERINE STREETORANGE STREETAPPLE STREETPEACH STREETMARJORIE STREETLAKE TRAFFORD ROADNO. 19th STREETNO. 18th STREETNO.19th TERRNO. 18th TERRNO. 18th ST.SHERMAN AVENUELEED AVENUEGRANT AVENUEFIFTEENTH STREET NO. (S.R. ROUTE 29)PUDRMF-6RMF-12C-31A-MHORSF-432VRV4RSF-4RSF-3C-1-C-3-SR29COSDC-4-RPUDSANDERS PINES3211381048TIMBER RIDGE7PUD12345678910111213141516171819202122232465512763413121110987654321252627282930313233343536373839 404142 4344454647484950515253545556575859WILTON CTCAMBRIDGE CT6556SR29COSDSR29COSD8,108,108,10HARVEST FORHUMANITYPUD9,1511VTRACT FTRACT HTRACT ITRACT JHARVEST DRTRACT C123REFLECTIONS AVETRACT G45TRACT AFRIENDSHIP WY30314842434445FRIENDSHIP DR.TRACT E1011981213201918403938212223SERENITY DRIVE26277614151716TRACT B28293537362425333432464741TRACT DFRIENDSHIP DRIVE497777RSF-312,16CU5653ST/W-4ST/W-2ST/W-113131313ST/W-4ST/W-213FAITH LANDING 14RPUD16CU17V1920 21 22 23242526 27 282918 1716 1514 13 12 11 10983456 712TRACTTRACTTRACTL-1P-2P-148448410104444810109ST/W-113ST/W-313ST/W-313ST/W-313TRACTC-1404142434445464748495253545556575859 6061656463 627071 72 73 74 7576 77787966676869303132333436373839505135TRACTCUSTER AVE.LINCOLN AVENUEDURSO COURTC-2TRACTC-1TRACTC-189119999989988899881188120 119 118 117 116 115 114 113 112 111 110 109 108 8081828384858687888990919293949596979899100 101 1 0 2 103104105106107DURSO COURTN. 18TH ST.C-2TRACT C-2TRACTC-1TRACTTRACT C-381088101081011DURSO COURTTRACT C-3TRACT C-1 TRACT C-2 EDEN AVENUE121 122 123 124 1251261271281291301311321331341351361371381391401411421431441451461471481491501511521531541551561 5 7 15 8 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 11118111188118IMMOKALEE FAIR HOUSINGALLIANCE INC.ÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕLAST REVISION: ZONING ___________________ OTHER ___________________SUBDIVISON INDEXATTEST___________________________CLERKCOLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDATWP 46S RNG 29E SEC(S) 32 NO 1/2MAP NUMBER:BY___________________________CHAIRMANCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISION$INDICATES SPECIAL TREATMENT OVERLAY6932N6932S6931N6933N6929SThe Historic/Archaeological Probability Maps are the officialCounty source designating historic or archaeologic resources.NO. NAME P.B. Pg.1 EDEN PARK 4 702 LAKE TRAFFORD ESTATES 4 823 EDEN PARK 1st ADDITION 5 34 TRAFFORD PINE ESTATES SECTION 1 10 99-1005 TIMBER RIDGE - UNIT ONE 24 1-26 TIMBER RIDGE - UNIT TWO 25 40-417 JUBILATION 37 4-78 FAITH LANDING PHASE ONE 51 46-509 FAITH LANDING PHASE TWO 54 51-5310 FAITH LANDING PHASE THREE 55 71-22ZONING NOTES1 3-27-84 R-83-2I 84-292 1-12-88 R-87-34C 88-53 4-20-82 R-82-2I 82-324 3-27-84 V-83-11C 84-635 10-30-91 LDC-91 91-1026 DELETED7 4-12-94 PUD-93-11 94-238 6-4-97 LDC 97-269 11-23-99 PUD-99-19 99-8010 6-29-98 LDC 98-6311 5-22-01 VA-01-AR-398 01-19212 3-26-02 CU-01-AR-1414 02-16213 9-25-12 LDC ORD. 12-3814 4-10-07 PUDZ-04-AR-6921 07-3515 7-24-07 PUDA-07-AR-11081 07-5916 4-22-08 CU-07-AR-11394 08-11417 1-27-09 VA-08-AR-13601 09-2118 9-8-20 PUDZ-PL-19-734 20-23THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A PAGE OF THEOFFICIAL ZONING ATLAS REFERRED TO AND ADOPTEDBY REFERENCE BY ORDINANCE NO. 04-41 OF THECOUNTY OF COLLIER, FLORIDA, ADOPTED JUNE 22, 2004,AS AMENDED BY THE ZONING NOTES AND SUBDIVISIONINDEX REFERENCED HEREON.NO. NAME P.B. Pg.11 FAITH LANDING PHASE FOUR 63 11-12121314151617181920DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS MODIFICATIONS12-4-19 ZVL(CUD)-PL-18-2744 HEX 19-07INDICATES AIRPORT OVERLAY(REFER TO APPENDIX D OF THE LDC)ÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕ ÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕ0 400SCALE9/22/20203.C.fPacket Pg. 120Attachment: Attachment E - Zoning Atlas - Current and Archived 6932N (27336 : PL20230012731 NUA 3.C.f Packet Pg. 121 Attachment: Attachment E - Zoning Atlas - Current and Archived 6932N (27336 : PL20230012731 NUA 1114 Palm Drive, Immokalee - Plunkett / 3.C.f Packet Pg. 122 Attachment: Attachment E - Zoning Atlas - Current and Archived 6932N (27336 : PL20230012731 NUA 1114 Palm Drive, Immokalee - Plunkett / &ƌŽŵ͗:ŽŚŶ<ĞůůǇ ^ĞŶƚ͗tĞĚŶĞƐĚĂǇ͕EŽǀĞŵďĞƌϮϵ͕ϮϬϮϯϵ͗ϬϱD dŽ͗:ŽŚŶ<ĞůůǇ ^ƵďũĞĐƚ͗EhсW>ϮϬϮϯϬϬϭϮϳϯϭͲϭϭϭϰWĂůŵƌ͕/ŵŵŽŬĂůĞĞͲ^ŝŐŶWŽƐƚŝŶŐ ƚƚĂĐŚŵĞŶƚƐ͗WŽƐƚŝŶŐϭ͘ũƉŐ͖WŽƐƚŝŶŐϮ͘ũƉŐ /͕:ŽŚŶ<ĞůůǇ͕ƉĞƌƐŽŶĂůůǇƉŽƐƚĞĚĂWƵďůŝĐ,ĞĂƌŝŶŐƐŝŐŶƚŽƚŚĞĨƌŽŶƚŽĨƚŚĞƐƵďũĞĐƚůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶ͕ŝŵŵĞĚŝĂƚĞůǇ ĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚƚŽƚŚĞƉƵďůŝĐƌŝŐŚƚͲŽĨͲǁĂǇ͕ĂƚĂƉƉƌŽǆŝŵĂƚĞůǇϰ͗ϯϬϬW͘D͘ŽŶdƵĞƐĚĂǇ͕EŽǀĞŵďĞƌϮϴ͕ϮϬϮϯ͕ĨŽƌ ƚŚĞϭϭͬϮϭͬϮϬϮϯŵĞĞƚŝŶŐŽĨƚŚĞ,ĞĂƌŝŶŐǆĂŵŝŶĞƌĂƐĞǀŝĚĞŶĐĞĚďǇƚŚĞĂƚƚĂĐŚĞĚƉŚŽƚŽƐ͘ ZĞƐƉĞĐƚĨƵůůǇ͕ John Kelly 3ODQQHU,,, Zoning Division – Zoning Services Section Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples Florida 34104 Phone: 239.252.5719 Fax: 239.252.6363 Email: John.Kelly@colliercountyfl.gov 7HOOXVKRZZHDUHGRLQJE\WDNLQJRXU=RQLQJ'LYLVLRQ6XUYH\DWŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬďŝƚ͘ůǇͬŽůůŝĞƌŽŶŝŶŐ ƐŝǌĞсϮǁŝĚƚŚсΗϭϬϬйΗĂůŝŐŶсĐĞŶƚĞƌх 8QGHU)ORULGD/DZHPDLODGGUHVVHVDUHSXEOLFUHFRUGV,I\RXGRQRWZDQW\RXUHPDLODGGUHVVUHOHDVHG LQUHVSRQVHWRDSXEOLFUHFRUGVUHTXHVWGRQRWVHQGHOHFWURQLFPDLOWRWKLVHQWLW\,QVWHDGFRQWDFWWKLV RIILFHE\WHOHSKRQHRULQZULWLQJ 3.C.g Packet Pg. 123 Attachment: Attachment F - NUA-PL20230012731 - Sign Posting (27336 : PL20230012731 NUA 1114 Palm Drive, Immokalee - Plunkett / 3.C.g Packet Pg. 124 Attachment: Attachment F - NUA-PL20230012731 - Sign Posting (27336 : PL20230012731 NUA 1114 Palm Drive, Immokalee - Plunkett / 3.C.h Packet Pg. 125 Attachment: Attachment G - Applicant's Backup Package (27336 : PL20230012731 NUA 1114 Palm Drive, Immokalee - Plunkett / Jauregui) 3.C.h Packet Pg. 126 Attachment: Attachment G - Applicant's Backup Package (27336 : PL20230012731 NUA 1114 Palm Drive, Immokalee - Plunkett / Jauregui) LEGAL DESCRIPTION “The South 75.00 Feet of the West 184.00 Feet of the North 225.00 feet of the East 478.57 feet of the Southwest ¼ of the Southeast ¼ of the Northwest ¼ of section 32, Township 46 South, Range 29 East, Collier County, Florida” 3.C.h Packet Pg. 127 Attachment: Attachment G - Applicant's Backup Package (27336 : PL20230012731 NUA 1114 Palm Drive, Immokalee - Plunkett / Jauregui) 3.C.h Packet Pg. 128 Attachment: Attachment G - Applicant's Backup Package (27336 : PL20230012731 NUA 1114 Palm Drive, Immokalee - Plunkett / Jauregui) 3.C.h Packet Pg. 129 Attachment: Attachment G - Applicant's Backup Package (27336 : PL20230012731 NUA 1114 Palm Drive, Immokalee - Plunkett / Jauregui) 3.C.h Packet Pg. 130 Attachment: Attachment G - Applicant's Backup Package (27336 : PL20230012731 NUA 1114 Palm Drive, Immokalee - Plunkett / Jauregui) 3.C.h Packet Pg. 131 Attachment: Attachment G - Applicant's Backup Package (27336 : PL20230012731 NUA 1114 Palm Drive, Immokalee - Plunkett / Jauregui) 3.C.h Packet Pg. 132 Attachment: Attachment G - Applicant's Backup Package (27336 : PL20230012731 NUA 1114 Palm Drive, Immokalee - Plunkett / Jauregui) 3.C.h Packet Pg. 133 Attachment: Attachment G - Applicant's Backup Package (27336 : PL20230012731 NUA 1114 Palm Drive, Immokalee - Plunkett / Jauregui) 3.C.h Packet Pg. 134 Attachment: Attachment G - Applicant's Backup Package (27336 : PL20230012731 NUA 1114 Palm Drive, Immokalee - Plunkett / Jauregui) 3.C.h Packet Pg. 135 Attachment: Attachment G - Applicant's Backup Package (27336 : PL20230012731 NUA 1114 Palm Drive, Immokalee - Plunkett / Jauregui) 3.C.h Packet Pg. 136 Attachment: Attachment G - Applicant's Backup Package (27336 : PL20230012731 NUA 1114 Palm Drive, Immokalee - Plunkett / Jauregui) 3.C.h Packet Pg. 137 Attachment: Attachment G - Applicant's Backup Package (27336 : PL20230012731 NUA 1114 Palm Drive, Immokalee - Plunkett / Jauregui) 3.C.h Packet Pg. 138 Attachment: Attachment G - Applicant's Backup Package (27336 : PL20230012731 NUA 1114 Palm Drive, Immokalee - Plunkett / Jauregui) 3.C.h Packet Pg. 139 Attachment: Attachment G - Applicant's Backup Package (27336 : PL20230012731 NUA 1114 Palm Drive, Immokalee - Plunkett / Jauregui) 3.C.h Packet Pg. 140 Attachment: Attachment G - Applicant's Backup Package (27336 : PL20230012731 NUA 1114 Palm Drive, Immokalee - Plunkett / Jauregui) 3.C.h Packet Pg. 141 Attachment: Attachment G - Applicant's Backup Package (27336 : PL20230012731 NUA 1114 Palm Drive, Immokalee - Plunkett / Jauregui) 3.C.h Packet Pg. 142 Attachment: Attachment G - Applicant's Backup Package (27336 : PL20230012731 NUA 1114 Palm Drive, Immokalee - Plunkett / Jauregui) 3.C.h Packet Pg. 143 Attachment: Attachment G - Applicant's Backup Package (27336 : PL20230012731 NUA 1114 Palm Drive, Immokalee - Plunkett / Jauregui) 3.C.h Packet Pg. 144 Attachment: Attachment G - Applicant's Backup Package (27336 : PL20230012731 NUA 1114 Palm Drive, Immokalee - Plunkett / Jauregui) 3.C.h Packet Pg. 145 Attachment: Attachment G - Applicant's Backup Package (27336 : PL20230012731 NUA 1114 Palm Drive, Immokalee - Plunkett / Jauregui) 3.C.hPacket Pg. 146Attachment: Attachment G - Applicant's Backup Package (27336 : PL20230012731 NUA 1114 Palm Drive, 3.C.h Packet Pg. 147 Attachment: Attachment G - Applicant's Backup Package (27336 : PL20230012731 NUA 1114 Palm Drive, Immokalee - Plunkett / Jauregui) 3.C.hPacket Pg. 148Attachment: Attachment G - Applicant's Backup Package (27336 : PL20230012731 NUA 1114 Palm Drive, Immokalee - Plunkett / Jauregui) 3.C.hPacket Pg. 149Attachment: Attachment G - Applicant's Backup Package (27336 : PL20230012731 NUA 1114 Palm Drive, Immokalee - Plunkett / Jauregui) 3.C.h Packet Pg. 150 Attachment: Attachment G - Applicant's Backup Package (27336 : PL20230012731 NUA 1114 Palm Drive, Immokalee - Plunkett / Jauregui) 3.C.h Packet Pg. 151 Attachment: Attachment G - Applicant's Backup Package (27336 : PL20230012731 NUA 1114 Palm Drive, Immokalee - Plunkett / Jauregui) 3.C.h Packet Pg. 152 Attachment: Attachment G - Applicant's Backup Package (27336 : PL20230012731 NUA 1114 Palm Drive, Immokalee - Plunkett / Jauregui) 3.C.h Packet Pg. 153 Attachment: Attachment G - Applicant's Backup Package (27336 : PL20230012731 NUA 1114 Palm Drive, Immokalee - Plunkett / Jauregui) 3.C.h Packet Pg. 154 Attachment: Attachment G - Applicant's Backup Package (27336 : PL20230012731 NUA 1114 Palm Drive, Immokalee - Plunkett / Jauregui) 3.C.h Packet Pg. 155 Attachment: Attachment G - Applicant's Backup Package (27336 : PL20230012731 NUA 1114 Palm Drive, Immokalee - Plunkett / Jauregui) 3.C.h Packet Pg. 156 Attachment: Attachment G - Applicant's Backup Package (27336 : PL20230012731 NUA 1114 Palm Drive, Immokalee - Plunkett / Jauregui) 3.C.h Packet Pg. 157 Attachment: Attachment G - Applicant's Backup Package (27336 : PL20230012731 NUA 1114 Palm Drive, Immokalee - Plunkett / Jauregui) 3.C.h Packet Pg. 158 Attachment: Attachment G - Applicant's Backup Package (27336 : PL20230012731 NUA 1114 Palm Drive, Immokalee - Plunkett / Jauregui) 3.C.h Packet Pg. 159 Attachment: Attachment G - Applicant's Backup Package (27336 : PL20230012731 NUA 1114 Palm Drive, Immokalee - Plunkett / Jauregui) 12/14/2023 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Hearing Examiner Item Number: 3.D Doc ID: 27316 Item Summary: Petition No. PDI-PL20230011202 - Yarberry Lane and Arbour Walk Circle - Request for an insubstantial change to the Palisades Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD), Ordinance No. 22-20, to modify the cross sections in Exhibit C of the Master Plan, including the depiction of the as -built elevations of 12.5 feet for the wall that runs the length of the perimeter RPUD boundary; and to revise Deviation 1 to reflect the correct elevation of the wall. The subject property consists of ±12.0 acres in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Yarberry Lane and Arbour Walk Circle in Section 2, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. [Eric Ortman, Planner III] Commissioner District 2 Meeting Date: 12/14/2023 Prepared by: Title: Principal Planner – Zoning Name: Sean Sammon 11/21/2023 3:58 PM Submitted by: Title: Zoning Director – Zoning Name: Mike Bosi 11/21/2023 3:58 PM Approved By: Review: Growth Management Community Development Department Diane Lynch Department review Skipped 11/22/2023 5:19 PM Operations & Regulatory Management Michael Stark Review Item Completed 11/28/2023 5:20 PM Zoning Ray Bellows Review Item Completed 11/28/2023 5:58 PM Zoning Mike Bosi Division Director Completed 11/29/2023 8:05 AM Hearing Examiner (GMD Approvers) Diane Lynch Review Item Completed 12/01/2023 12:45 PM Hearing Examiner Andrew Dickman Meeting Pending 12/14/2023 9:00 AM 3.D Packet Pg. 160 PDI-PL20230011202, Palisades RPUD Page 1 of 7 STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FROM: ZONING DIVISION – ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: DECEMBER 14, 2023 SUBJECT: PDI-PL20230011202, PALISADES RPUD APPLICANT/AGENT: REQUESTED ACTION: The petitioner requests an insubstantial change (PDI) to Ordinance No. 2022-20 for the Palisades Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) to modify the cross sections shown in Exhibit C of the Master Plan, including the depiction of the permitter wall as-built elevation of 12.5 feet. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject ±12-acre planned unit development property is in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Yarberry Lane and Arbour Walk Circle, approximately 1,200 feet south of the intersection of Orange Blossom Road and Yarberry Lane. Yarberry Lane is approximately 2,000 feet to the west of and runs parallel to Airport Road. The property is in Section 2 Township 49 South, Range 25 East, in unincorporated Collier County. (See location map on page 2). PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The Palisades RPUD was originally rezoned from RSF-1 by the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) on May 24, 2022 (Ord. 22-20) to allow the development of up to 36 detached single-family dwelling units and accessory structures. The site has been platted and cleared; some infrastructure, such as sanitary sewer, has been installed. A perimeter berm and six- to eight-foot wall have also been constructed. Owner:Applicant: Yarberry Partners, LLC Yarberry Partners, LLC 921 Interstate Commerce Dr.921 Interstate Commerce Dr. Fort Myers, FL. 33913 Fort Myers, FL. 33913 Applicant: Jem Frantz RVI Planning and Landscape Architecture 28100 Bonita Grande Dr. Bonita Springs, FL. 34135 3.D.a Packet Pg. 161 Attachment: PDI Staff Report Palisades RPUD (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) PDI-PL20230011202, Palisades RPUD Page 2 of 7 Cross-Section Adjustment to Berm Elevations to Reflect As-Built Conditions An error in the survey berm elevations was discovered after constructing the berm and wall, which led to the submittal of this petition. Figure 1 on page 3 reflects the cross-sections from Ord. 22-20. Figures 2 & 3, also on page 3, reflect as-built cross-sections which show different base and berm elevations than those approved in Ord. 22-20. Two cross-sections are shown as the berm elevation varies around the property's perimeter. 3.D.a Packet Pg. 162 Attachment: PDI Staff Report Palisades RPUD (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) PDI-PL20230011202, Palisades RPUD Page 3 of 7 Figure 1 – Approved Cross-Section from Ord. 22-20 Maximum Combined Berm and Wall Height is 13.0 feet: [(15.25 – 10.25) + 8] = 13.0 Figure 2 - Proposed Cross-Section AA Combined Berm and Wall Height Left Side of Wall is 11.41 feet: [(14.6 – 9.79) + 6.6] = 11.41 Combined Berm and Wall Height Right Side of Wall is 10.96 feet: [(15.85 – 9.79) + 4.9] = 10.96 Figure 3 - Proposed Cross-Section BB Combined Berm and Wall Height Left Side of Wall is 12.4 feet: [(14.6 – 8.88) + 6.7] = 12.42 Combined Berm and Wall Height Right Side of Wall is 13.0 feet: [(15.85 – 8.88) + 5.1] = 12.07 3.D.a Packet Pg. 163 Attachment: PDI Staff Report Palisades RPUD (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) PDI-PL20230011202, Palisades RPUD Page 4 of 7 Error in Deviation Language While staff was reviewing the petition, an error in the Deviation #1 language of Ord. 22-20 was discovered. In Ord. 22-20, the deviation reads: Deviation 1 from LDC Section 5.03.02.C.2, “Fences and Walls,” which permits a maximum fence/wall height of six feet in residential components of planned unit development districts, to allow for a maximum fence/wall/berm height of 8 feet along the PUD perimeter boundary. The intent of this deviation was to allow a wall of up to eight feet to be installed , as demonstrated by the deviation language and Master Plan for Ord. 22-20 (See Attachment 1). If the word “berm” was not included in the deviation request, the wording would have been consistent with LDC 5.03.02, would match the intent of the deviation request, and would agree with Master Plan of Ord. 22-20 (Figure 4). In addition, the applicant has planted additional small trees along the wall. At the request of adjacent neighbors, the applicant also installed a chain link fence in the southwest corner of the property to close off an open area and join an existing chain link fence of an abutting PUD that the neighbors were concerned that people might use as a cut-through while walking. LAND USE AND ZONING: This section of the staff report identifies the land uses and zoning classifications for properties near the portion of the PUD affected by the request. North: Residential Single-Family (RSF-1) and a Conditional Use for a church. East: Residential Single-Family (RSF-1) South: Keystone Place PUD West: Sleepy Hollow PUD Aside from the abutting RSF-1 districts to the north and east, PUDs surround the subject property. See Figure 5 on the next page. Fig. 4 - Ord. 22-20 Master Plan Ord. 22-20 As approved by Ord. 22-20, the maximum height of the berm/fence combination was 13.0 feet (See Figure 1). Figures 2 & 3 show the height of the berm/wall combination which varies from from 10.96 feet to 12.42 feet resulting in a berm/wall 0.58 to 2.04 feet shorter than that which was approved. The applicant met with affected neighbors and explained the nature of the error. Along the western border of the property is where the wall is the lowest. The applicant proactively planted an additional hedge that will be allowed to grow 18 to 24 inches over the top of the existing wall which will essentially negate the error of the wall being too low. 3.D.a Packet Pg. 164 Attachment: PDI Staff Report Palisades RPUD (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) PDI-PL20230011202, Palisades RPUD Page 5 of 7 STAFF ANALYSIS: LDC Sections 10.02.13.E.1 and 10.02.13.E.2 set forth the criteria by which insubstantial amendments to a PUD Master Plan and/or minor text changes to a PUD document are to be reviewed before they can be approved. The criteria and a response to each have been listed as follows: LDC Section 10.02.13.E.1: a. Is there a proposed change in the boundary of the Planned Unit Development (PUD)? No, there is no proposed change in the boundary of the PUD. b. Is there a proposed increase in the total number of dwelling units, intensity of land use, or height of buildings within the development? No, there is no proposed increase in the number of dwelling units, intensity of land use, or height of buildings within the development. c. Is there a proposed decrease in preservation, conservation, recreation, or open space areas within the development greater than 5% of the total acreage previously designated as such, or five acres in area? No, there is no proposed decrease in preservation, conservation, recreation, or open space areas within the development as designated on the approved Master Plan. d. Is there a proposed increase in the size of areas used for non-residential uses to include institutional, commercial, and industrial land uses (excluding preservation, conservation, or open space), or a proposed relocation of nonresidential land uses? No, there is no proposed increase to the size of areas used for non-residential uses and no relocation of non-residential areas. e. Is there a substantial increase in the impacts of the development, which may include, but are not limited to increases in traffic generation, changes in traffic circulation, or impacts on other public facilities? No, there are no substantial impacts resulting from this amendment. f. Will the change result in land use activities that generate a higher level of vehicular traffic based upon the Trip Generation Manual published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers? No additional traffic will be generated from this amendment. Subject Property 3.D.a Packet Pg. 165 Attachment: PDI Staff Report Palisades RPUD (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) PDI-PL20230011202, Palisades RPUD Page 6 of 7 g. Will the change result in a requirement for increased stormwater retention or otherwise increase stormwater discharge? No, the proposed changes will not impact or increase stormwater retention or increase stormwater discharge. h. Will the proposed change bring about a relationship to an abutting land use that would be incompatible with an adjacent land use? No. There will be no incompatible relationships with abutting land uses. i. Are there any modifications to the PUD Master Plan or PUD Document or amendments to a PUD ordinance, which is inconsistent with the Future Land Use Element or other elements of the Growth Management Plan or which modification would increase the density of intensity of the permitted land uses? No. Comprehensive Planning staff determined that Ord. 22-20 was consistent with the FLUE of the GMP. There will be no change in the density or intensity of development and no change in the list of permitted uses. j. The proposed change is to a PUD district designated as a development of regional impact (DRI) and approved pursuant to F.S. § 380.06, where such change requires a determination and public hearing by Collier County pursuant to F.S. § 380.06(19). Any change that meets the criterion of F.S. §380.06(19)(e)2, and any changes to a DRI/PUD master plan that clearly do not create a substantial deviation shall be reviewed and approved by Collier County under this LDC section 10.02.13; or This question is not applicable as the development does not rise to the level of a regional impact. k. Any modification in the PUD master plan or PUD document or amendment to a PUD ordinance which impact(s) any consideration deemed to be a substantial modification as described under this LDC section 10.02.13. No, this petition is an insubstantial change to the Palisades RPUD and seeks only to reflect as-built conditions and clean up an error in Deviation #1 of Ord. 22-20. LDC Section 10.02.13.E.2: Insubstantial change determination. An insubstantial change includes any change that is not considered a substantial or minor change. An insubstantial change to an approved PUD Ordinance shall be based upon an evaluation of LDC subsection 10.02.13 E.1 The petition is changing the berm/wall elevations shown in the Master Plan of Ord. 22-20 to reflect as-built conditions and to correct an error in the language of Deviation #1 to bring it into agreement with the Master Plan. As such, it is an insubstantial change that successfully meets the LDC 10.02.13 E.1 criteria. DEVIATION DISCUSSION: The petitioner is not seeking any deviations but rather to correct an error in Deviation #1 of Ord. 22-20. Ord. 22-20 Deviation #1 currently reads: Deviation 1 from LDC Section 5.03.02.C.2, “Fences and Walls,” which permits a maximum fence/wall height of six feet in residential components of planned unit development districts, to allow for a maximum fence/wall/berm height of 8 feet along the PUD perimeter boundary. 3.D.a Packet Pg. 166 Attachment: PDI Staff Report Palisades RPUD (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) PDI-PL20230011202, Palisades RPUD Page 7 of 7 The proposed change is to change 8 feet to 12.5 feet, as shown below: Deviation 1 from LDC Section 5.03.02.C.2, “Fences and Walls,” which permits a maximum fence/wall height of six feet in residential components of planned unit development districts, to allow for a maximum fence/wall/berm height of 12.5 feet along the PUD perimeter boundary. Petitioner’s Justification: The change is to correct an error in the deviation language so that it matches the approved master plan and reflects existing conditions. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: The requested insubstantial change to the deviation language will bring the deviation language into agreement with the approved master plan. The deviation is for the perimeter berm and wall, which have already been built and conform to the existing master plan. Staff sees no detrimental effect if this deviation request is approved. Zoning staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation, finding it in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, and that there will be no detrimental effect on the surrounding communities' health, safety, and welfare. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): A NIM was held at 5:00 p.m. on November 16, 2023, at the Collier County Public Library Headquarters Branch located at 2385 Orange Blossom Road. One person from the public attended, wanting to know how this would affect her property, which abuts the Palisades RPUD along its western border. The applicant described the steps that have been taken to add additional trees and hedges to offset the lower wall and that the hedge would be allowed to grow to the height of the wall as originally planned, which will offset the applicant’s error in setting the wall too low. The NIM concluded at approximately 5:30 p.m. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney's Office reviewed the staff report on November 20, 2023. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Collier County Hearing Examiner approve Petition PDI-PL20230011202. Attachments: 1. Master Plan and Deviation Language from Ord. 22-20 2. Applicant Backup Materials 3. Legal Ad and Sign Posting 3.D.a Packet Pg. 167 Attachment: PDI Staff Report Palisades RPUD (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) I-C N2G990q/27, 9'coC0 -a oe j § \ § c 44 f § \ \± § Q z W_ § y mrn Z ® 7J2 ni « r,_,_,_,- - - - - I- - I - 1- — '-'-'- f• ' j m i r- I 222 M''''...\........ z m § \ \ j ) ) )Ica o m j $ z e2 E2 § | a@ 2 ? g I § \ \ \ \ Hcn j M . $ § i >g e & j ze&' » k 7 §M I w @i 5 I I f I d<S «> .v a ® I § § 2 y . a L,_,_,_,_,_, , ,_,_,_/ , ,22 - - 1J RyNE IF § $ 7mNE cL) ra g m M > G d r. N• P 2im t - 5 2 > k \ / o ,< ; : E - 2 §I A 2 G§f 9 f; 2-111111m....- PALISADES UD WALDROP E G1N R G PUD MASTER PLAN t OMM f c 4 3.D.bPacket Pg. 168Attachment: Attachment 1 - Master Plan and Deviation Language from Ord. 22-20 (27316 : PL20230011202 Itmq f1 §§0 4 2 m , co m2 i H \ u m 0 k k4 4 2§ e c m e m g 2 E 7 @ 0 @ ® ° Q 2 2 2 0 e , il h ƒ0 o z re01 dill' 22 kLI\ i REVISIONS PALISADES RPUD WALDROP IAI ENGINEERING PUD MASTER PLAN ENGINEERINGLANDDEVILIIMIEVE EXHIBIT C 3.D.bPacket Pg. 169Attachment: Attachment 1 - Master Plan and Deviation Language from Ord. 22-20 (27316 : PL20230011202 @ > xz < Wo ¥ ¥ az HO2 § \ § 2 r—>I m ° \ m < \ < o <c mjHmgrc ¥ § m > m > K > mm >m . w w mm m0aww00 § § § § mz Fz mz x § k00r \ \ m § j -nk § \ cw > "" 0 I . - 0 _ 0 mmKmHmwzi ) $ $ j §E / ® ° r mr Omema0000 = m2m 0 o0 § / bo > mwm - z < m -I m0 ow 3 / \ ƒ w0 >r- um >0 zo § § §z = mw a • zom ' m 0 \\ \2 > z wz § kK > \ mom H H Cr- ° O 0 ° m ® ezA o ] mmc wo \ / cm \ § 02o z m 0m oe z r m $ 0 z7x o . z 00 \y i® \ b m HmH \ 0 o 0 I > \\ tee o \ 2 0 / 2b ) / q \ Nz r z 2 m g ® _ m Cz° z ? 2 -I 008 0 m R § & X Z > 0 / w > \ Cl)- > 0 > ® oz 0 k \ rnm 0 fE \ c) \ m \ > Cl) o a ° arT1 q Cl) - t- 0 - \ \ m % 0 r > z > \ \\ E a o m z a = z = 2 7/ zjj z \ @ - » o a $ o ) ® m < > e E0 ee = ° Bxioz * m ( a -0 > _ mz 0 m 0 m- 2 0 mHEt = » f 2 z 0z Q - K m z o « o ® z ¥ = o x0 wo cf 0 \ \ 01 > 71 » _ c cc m H K K 3 = « X r m m 0 am 2 m § § 2 / Jm E m \ mm2 \ dj ; j5 r- m K k gA : § 2 w > p r K 0 CO 1 mm mmZ m Z 0 * § 0 m \ c 0 ° I oCl) C 0 k $ m C e - c m § 0 0 -n z I I @ « e > m m o r a = k 0 § 0 ) k o 3 m z a jz\ , mm >j 0 PALISADES RPUD WALDNOP G1N[R1 G j PUD MASTER PLAN E i!c r— MR KLS BOWL WRING,FL Ull5 3.D.bPacket Pg. 170Attachment: Attachment 1 - Master Plan and Deviation Language from Ord. 22-20 (27316 : PL20230011202 PALISADES RPUD PDI Planned Unit Development Insubstantial Change HEX Package December 14, 2023 PREPARED FOR: Yarberry Partners, LLC SUBMITTED TO: Collier County Growth Management Department Zoning Division 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34104 3.D.c Packet Pg. 171 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) Table of Contents Contents Completed Application Form Pre-Application Meeting Waiver Project Narrative Current Approved Ordinance Revised Master Plan Revised PUD Document Deviations and Justifications Warranty Deed Plat Book Pages Affidavit of Authorization Addressing Checklist Property Ownership Disclosure NIM Summary 3.D.c Packet Pg. 172 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) Palisades RPUD PDI Hearing Package Completed Application Form 3.D.c Packet Pg. 173 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Revised 3/27/2018 Page 1 of 4 INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PUD (PDI) LDC subsection 10.02.13 E & Code of Laws section 2-83 – 2-90 Ch. 3 G.3 of the Administrative Code Pursuant to LDC subsection 10.02.13 E.2, a PUD insubstantial change includes any change that is not considered a substantial or a minor change. A PUD insubstantial change to an approved PUD ordinance shall be based upon an evaluation of LDC subsection 10.02.13 E.1 and shall require the review and approval of the Hearing Examiner. The Hearing Examiner’s approval shall be based on the findings and criteria used for the original application . PETITION NO PROJECT NAME DATE PROCESSED APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Property Owner(s): ______________________________________________________ Name of Applicant if different than owner: __________________________________________ Address: __________________________City: _____________ State: _______ ZIP: __________ Telephone: ____________________ Cell: ____________________ Fax: ___________________ E-Mail Address: ________________________________________________________________ Name of Agent: ________________________________________________________________ Firm: _________________________________________________________________________ Address: ______________________City: _______________ State: _________ ZIP: __________ Telephone: _____________________ Cell: _____________________ Fax: _________________ E-Mail Address: ________________________________________________________________ DETAIL OF REQUEST On a separate sheet, attached to the application, describe the insubstantial change request. Identify how the request does not meet the PUD substantial change criteria established in LDC subsection 10.02.13 E.1. To be completed by staff 3.D.c Packet Pg. 174 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Revised 3/27/2018 Page 2 of 4 PROPERTY INFORMATION PUD NAME: _______________________ ORDINANCE NUMBER: ________________________ FOLIO NUMBER(S): _____________________________________________________________ Provide a legal (if PUD is recorded) or graphic description of area of amendment (this may be graphically illustrated on Amended PUD Master Plan). If applying for a portion of the PUD, provide a legal description for subject portion. Attach on a separate sheet, a written description of the map or text change. Does amendment comply with the Growth Management Plan? Yes No If no, please explain: _______________________________________________________ Has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? Yes No If yes, in whose name? _____________________________________________________ Has any portion of the PUD been SOLD and/or DEVELOPED? Are any changes proposed for the area sold and/or developed? Yes No If yes, please describe on an attached separate sheet. 3.D.c Packet Pg. 175 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Revised 3/27/2018 Page 3 of 4 Pre-Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: PUD Insubstantial Change Chapter 3 G.3 of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW # OF COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Completed Application (download current form from County website) 1 Pre-Application Meeting notes 1 Project Narrative, including a detailed description of proposed changes and why amendment is necessary 1 Detail of request 1 Current Master Plan & 1 Reduced Copy 1 Revised Master Plan & 1 Reduced Copy 1 Revised Text and any exhibits PUD document with changes crossed through & underlined PUD document as revised with amended Title Page with Ordinance # Warranty Deed Legal Description 1 Boundary survey, if boundary of original PUD is amended If PUD is platted, include plat book pages List identifying Owner & all parties of corporation 1 Affidavit of Authorization, signed & notarized 1 Completed Addressing Checklist 1 Property Ownership Disclosure Form 1 Copy of 8 ½ in. x 11 in. graphic location map of site 1 Electronic copy of all documents and plans *Please advise: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all materials to be submitted electronically in PDF format. *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: • Following the completion of the review process by County Review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. • Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. 3.D.c Packet Pg. 176 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Revised 3/27/2018 Page 4 of 4 PLANNERS – INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment: Executive Director Utilities Engineering: Eric Fey Parks and Recreation: Barry Williams and David Berra Emergency Management: Dan Summers Naples Airport Authority: Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Johnson Other: City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director Other: FEE REQUIREMENTS  PUD Amendment Insubstantial (PDI): $1,500.00  Pre-Application Meeting: $500.00  Estimated Legal Advertising fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner: $1,125.00 Same fee applies if the petition is referred to the Collier County Planning Commission, where the CCPC serves as the deciding authority instead of the HEX. Fire Code Plans Review Fees are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department Planning and Regulation ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 ____________________________________________ ____________ Agent/Owner Signature Date ____________________________________________ Applicant/Owner Name (please print) 3.D.c Packet Pg. 177 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) Palisades RPUD PDI Hearing Package Pre-Application Meeting Waiver 3.D.c Packet Pg. 178 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) 1 Jeremy Frantz From:BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent:Friday, June 16, 2023 11:58 AM To:Jeremy Frantz; BosiMichael Cc:Jackie Larocque; McKennaJack; Brandon Hadlock; Ayberk Vergul; Alexis Crespo Subject:RE: Palisades PDI - Fence Detail Good morning, I apologize for the delay in responding. However, your requested waiver from attending a preapplication meeting for the above referenced PDI petition has been approved. Respectfully, Ray Raymond V. Bellows, Zoning Manager Zoning Division - Zoning Services Section Growth Management Department Telephone: 239.252.2463; Fax: 239.252.6350 Exceeding expectations, every day! Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at https://goo.gl/eXjvqT. From: Jeremy Frantz <jfrantz@rviplanning.com> Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2023 2:28 PM To: BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov>; BosiMichael <Michael.Bosi@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: Jackie Larocque <jlarocque@atwell-group.com>; McKennaJack <Jack.McKenna@colliercountyfl.gov>; Brandon Hadlock <bhadlock@atwell-group.com>; Ayberk Vergul <avergul@atwell-group.com>; Alexis Crespo <acrespo@rviplanning.com> Subject: RE: Palisades PDI - Fence Detail EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Hi Ray, Just following up on this request for Alexis. Let me know if you need to discuss further. Sincerely, Jeremy Frantz, AICP Project Director 3.D.c Packet Pg. 179 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) 2 Opening the Outdoors for 40 Years! RVi Planning + Landscape Architecture 28100 Bonita Grande Dr, Suite 305 • Bonita Springs, FL 34135 239.357.9580 Mobile • 239.319.0026 Direct • 239.405.7777 Main www.rviplanning.com This email is intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This message and attachments may contain confidential information. Unauthorized review or use is strictly prohibited. If you received this message in error, please advise the sender and delete all copies of this message. From: Alexis Crespo <acrespo@rviplanning.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 7, 2023 9:46 AM To: BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov>; BosiMichael <Michael.Bosi@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: Jackie Larocque <jlarocque@atwell-group.com>; jack.mckenna@colliercountyfl.gov; Brandon Hadlock <bhadlock@atwell-group.com>; Ayberk Vergul <avergul@atwell-group.com> Subject: Palisades PDI - Fence Detail Good Morning, The planning team has been asked to file a PDI to modify our fence cross secCon on the PUD master plan. I believe Jack has communicated to you both on this topic and we are hoping to get a pre-app waiver as this is preEy much a housekeeping update. I aEached the redlined PUD plan with the change. If we need to jump on a call I can make myself available at your convenience. Thanks very much! ***Please note my new RVi email address*** Alexis Crespo, AICP Vice President of Planning Opening the Outdoors for 40 Years! 28100 Bonita Grande Dr, Suite 305 • Bonita Springs, FL 34135 239.850.8525 Mobile • 239.908.3405 Direct • 239.405.7777 Main www.rviplanning.com (-> nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com) This email is intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This message and attachments may contain confidential information. Unauthorized review or use is strictly prohibited. If you received this message in error, please advise the sender and delete all copies of this message. Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Links contained in this email have been replaced. If you click on a link in the email above, the link will be analyzed for known threats. If a known threat is found, you will not be able to proceed to the destination. If suspicious content is detected, you will see a warning. 3.D.c Packet Pg. 180 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) Palisades RPUD PDI Hearing Package Project Narrative 3.D.c Packet Pg. 181 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) RVi Planning + Landscape Architecture | Page 1 of 4 Palisades RPUD PDI June 19, 2023 REVISED AUGUST 2023 Mr. Ray Bellows Planning and Zoning Division Zoning Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 RE: Palisades RPUD Insubstantial Change to a Planned Unit Development (PDI) Dear Mr. Bellows: Enclosed for your review is an application for an Insubstantial Change to a PUD in regard to the Palisades RPUD, a 12± acre residential project located on the west side of Yarberry Lane and approximately 0.2 mile south of Orange Blossom Drive in unincorporated Collier County, Florida. The Applicant is requesting to modify the Master Plan (Exhibit C) to add cross-sections that depict changed as-built elevations. EXISTING CONDITIONS The Palisades RPUD was originally rezoned by the Board of County Commissioners on May 24, 2022, from Residential Single-Family-1 (RSF-1) to Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) by Ordinance No. 2022-20. The RPUD allowed the development of up to 36 detached single-family dwelling units and accessory uses. To date, the site has been platted (see Plat Book 73, pages 31-32), cleared and some infrastructure, such as sanitary sewer has been installed. Additionally, the required berm and six-foot wall have been constructed along the property boundary in accordance with the approved Master Plan. REQUEST Yarberry Partners, LLC (“Applicant”) is requesting Staff’s approval of an insubstantial change to the Palisades RPUD to allow for a modification the Master Plan approved in Ordinance 2022- 20. The approved Master Plan includes one cross-section called the “Typical Wall Cross Section” on Exhibit C sheet 2. This cross section applies to all property boundaries and includes elevation data, which is not typically included on a Master Plan. The request replaces the single cross-section with two cross-sections related to conditions at the property lines and labels them “Section A-A” and “Section B-B.” The existing ROW and sidewalk cross sections are moved to a separate page for legibility, but no substantive changes have been made to these cross sections. Modifications to Master Plan Sheet 1 are limited to identifying the relevant cross- section at each property line. The proposed modifications to the cross-sections are needed to address a surveying error which resulted in elevations at the property line differing from those in Ordinance 2022-20. Before the error was identified, the six-foot wall was installed as required. However, the elevation at the property line differed from the elevation identified on the approved Master Plan. Due to the error at the property line, the wall was installed at the elevation of 14.25 NAVD, rather than 15.25 NAVD as shown in Ordinance 2022-20, a difference of approximately one foot lower than depicted on the Master Plan. When the error was discovered, the Applicant met with affected property owners and explained the nature of the error. At that time, the Applicant committed to 3.D.c Packet Pg. 182 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) RVi Planning + Landscape Architecture | Page 2 of 4 Palisades RPUD PDI enhanced plantings along the western property boundary, including 14-foot oak trees planted on the east side of the wall and between the required buffer trees. These enhanced plantings satisfied the adjacent property owners’ concerns. Other differences between the existing and proposed wall cross sections are the result of the addition of a second cross-section allowing for each cross-section to demonstrate only those elements relevant to the respective property line. These differences provide additional specificity and do not represent substantive changes to the previously approved conditions at the property lines. The difference in surveyed height also resulted in a maximum combined berm/wall height of 12.5 feet, which required a modification to Exhibit E, deviation 1 in the PUD document and on the PUD Master Plan. The request to modify the Typical Wall Cross-Section avoids significant costs to the Applicant and extended construction timelines which would be associated with removing all installed site infrastructure to rebuild to the previously approved elevations. The change does not represent a deviation from any requirements in the LDC and is limited to the minimum changes necessary to correct the surveying error. JUSTIFICATION/COMPLIANCE WITH LDC §10.02.13 E.1: The request complies with the thresholds for insubstantial changes to PUDs as outlined in LDC§ 10.02.13.E.1 as follows: a. A proposed change in the boundary of the PUD; No, the request will not impact the existing PUD boundary. b. A proposed increase in the total number of dwelling units or intensity of land use or height of buildings within the development; No, the request will not increase the approved density or intensity, or the height of proposed buildings. c. A proposed decrease in preservation, conservation, recreation, or open space areas within the development not to exceed 5 percent of the total acreage previously designated as such, or 5 acres in area; No, the request will not result in a decrease of preserve, conservation, recreation, or open space areas. d. A proposed increase in the size of areas used for nonresidential uses, to include institutional, commercial, and industrial land uses (excluding preservation, conservation, or open spaces), or a proposed relocation of nonresidential land uses; No, the request does not impact the size of non-residential areas or propose to relocate such areas within the PUD boundary. e. A substantial increase in the impacts of the development which may include, but are not limited to, increases in traffic generation; changes in traffic circulation; or impacts on other public facilities; No, the request will not result in a substantial increase in the impact of the development. 3.D.c Packet Pg. 183 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) RVi Planning + Landscape Architecture | Page 3 of 4 Palisades RPUD PDI f. A change that will result in land use activities that generate a higher level of vehicular traffic based upon the Trip Generation Manual published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers; No, the request will not generate a higher level of vehicular traffic. No change in land use activities or intensities is being requested. g. A change that will result in a requirement for increased stormwater retention, or will otherwise increase stormwater discharges; No, the request will not result in increased requirements for stormwater retention or increase stormwater discharges. h. A change that will bring about a relationship to an abutting land use that would be incompatible with an adjacent land use; No, the request will not modify any existing uses or intensities that would impact any surrounding land uses or that would be incompatible. i. Any modification to the PUD master plan or PUD document or amendment to a PUD ordinance which is inconsistent with the Future Land Use Element or other element of the Growth Management Plan or which modification would increase the density or intensity of the permitted land uses; No, the request does not impact the project’s compliance with the Growth Management Plan (GMP). j. The proposed change is to a PUD district designated as a development of regional impact (DRI) and approved pursuant to F.S. § 380.06, where such change requires a determination and public hearing by Collier County pursuant to F.S. § 380.06(19). Any change that meets the criterion of F.S. § 380.06(19)(e)2, and any changes to a DRI/PUD master plan that clearly do not create a substantial deviation shall be reviewed and approved by Collier County under this LDC section 10.02.13; or No, the RPUD is not within a Development of Regional Impact. k. Any modification in the PUD master plan or PUD document or amendment to a PUD ordinance which impact(s) any consideration deemed to be a substantial modification as described under this LDC section 10.02.13. No, the request is not a substantial modification to the RPUD and may be processed as a PDI pursuant to the LDC and Administrative Code. The request complies with the thresholds for insubstantial changes to PUDs as outlined in LDC§ 10.02.13.E.2 as follows: 1. Does this petition change the analysis of findings and criteria used for the original application? As outlined in pages 11 through 15 of the original Staff Report for the PUD Rezoning of the subject RPUD, the proposed petition has not modified the original analysis of findings and criteria. No change to the permitted land uses, intensities or required design standards are being requested as part of the petition. the elevations shown on the approved Master Plan were included for clarity regarding 3.D.c Packet Pg. 184 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) RVi Planning + Landscape Architecture | Page 4 of 4 Palisades RPUD PDI the proposed wall height and not to address a code requirement specifically. The staff report indicates that the wall height would mitigate noise impact and provide appropriate screening. Furthermore, enhanced plantings will ensure there are no impacts on surrounding properties. As a result, the request will maintain compatibility with surrounding properties and does not change the analysis of the original findings and criteria. CONCLUSION In summary, the proposed Insubstantial Change to modify the Master Plan to modify the Typical Wall Cross-Section ensures the elevations depicted on the Master Plan are consistent with the built conditions. No changes to the required setbacks, buffers types, or wall heights are proposed and compatibility with neighboring properties is preserved by the request. The request is limited to the changes to the Master Plan and no changes to the Ordinance text are proposed. This application will not negatively impact public health, safety, or welfare, and the RPUD will remain consistent with the LDC and GMP. Should you require additional information or have any questions, please feel free to contact me directly at (239) 357-9580 or jfrantz@rviplanning.com. Sincerely, RVi Planning + Landscape Architecture Jem Frantz, AICP Project Director Enclosures cc: Keith Norton, Yarberry Partners, LLC Tim Byal, Yarberry Partners, LLC Jackie Larocque, Atwell, LLC 3.D.c Packet Pg. 185 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) Palisades RPUD PDI Hearing Package Current Approved Ordinance 3.D.c Packet Pg. 186 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) ORDINANCE NO. 2022- 20 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM A RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY-1 RSF-1) ZONING DISTRICT WITHIN SPECIAL., TREATMENT WELLFIELD ZONES W-3 AND W-4 TO A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) ZONING DISTRICT WITHIN SPECIAL TREATMENT WELLFIELD ZONES W-3 AND W-4 FOR A PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS PALISADES RPUD TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF UP TO 36 DETACHED SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING UNITS, ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF YARBERRY LANE, SOUTH OF ORANGE BLOSSOM DRIVE AND WEST OF AIRPORT PULLING ROAD IN SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 12+/- ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PL20210000979] WHEREAS, John Cowart, of Waldrop Engineering representing Yarberry Partners, LLC, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: The zoning classification of the herein described real property located in Section 2, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from a Residential Single-Family-1 (RSF-1) Zoning District within Special Treatment Wellfield Zones W-3 and W-4 to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) Zoning District within Special 21-CPS-02126/1711911/1]103 Palisades/PL20210000979 Page 1 of 2 4/11/22 3.D.c Packet Pg. 187 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) Treatment Wellfield Zones W-3 and W-4 for the 12+/- acre project to be known as Palisades RPUD in accordance with Exhibits A-F attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps, as described in Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, is/are hereby amended accordingly. SECTION TWO: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super-majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this :T1-Ph dayof 2022. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CRYSTAL I ;rKJ,NZEL, CLERK COLLIER CO RIDA 41111.WBy: . By: G- I ` : . uty Clerk Wi iam L. McDaniel, Jr., Chairman esta$ . . t _ 4 sl ature onir, Approved as'-to fftih "and legality: C/tivCkA Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney Attachments: Exhibit A: List of Permitted Uses Exhibit B: Development and Design Standards This ordinance fiied with the Exhibit C: Master Concept Plan cy of t ,s Of'4 t}e Exhibit D: Legal Description day of LUZ and acknowled atExhibitE: Deviations tern t Exhibit F: Development Commitments Qf° ed ' day y Daautv 21-CPS-02126/1711911/1]103 Palisades/PL20210000979 Page 2 of 2 4/11/22 3.D.c Packet Pg. 188 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) EXHIBIT "A" LIST OF PERMITTED USES Palisades RPUD Regulations for development of this PUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this document and all applicable sections of the Growth Management Plan (GMD), the Land Development Code (LDC), and the Administrative Code in effect at the time of approval of the first subdivision plat (PPL). Where the PUD ordinance does not provide development standards, then the provision of the specific sections of the LDC that are otherwise applicable shall apply. PERMITTED USES: A maximum of 36 dwelling units (3 du/acre) shall be permitted in this PUD. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: I.RESIDENTIAL TRACTS A. Principal Uses: 1. Single-family detached dwelling units. Any other accessory use and related use that is determined to be comparable to the foregoing by the Board of Zoning Appeals, or Hearing Examiner, pursuant to the process outlined in the Land Development Code (LDC). B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses customarily associated with Permitted Principal Uses, including but not limited to: 1. Customary accessory uses and structures including carports, garages, and utility buildings. 2. Temporary sales trailers and model units. 3. Essential services, including interim and permanent utility and maintenance facilities. 4. Water management facilities. 5. Walls, berms and signs. 6. Passive open space uses and structures, including, but not limited to landscaped areas, gazebos, park benches, and walking trails. Any other accessory use and related use that is determined to be comparable to the foregoing by the Board of Zoning Appeals, or Hearing Examiner, pursuant to the process outlined in the Land Development Code (LDC). Palisades RPUD Last Revised:April 11, 2022 Page 1 of 10 3.D.c Packet Pg. 189 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) EXHIBIT "B" DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Palisades RPUD The standards for land uses within the development shall be as stated in these development standard tables. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the subdivision plat (PPL). Guardhouses, gatehouses, access control structures, clock towers, columns, decorative hardscaping or architectural embellishments associated with the project's entrance are permitted and shall have no required setbacks; however, such structures cannot be located where they create sight distance issues for motorists and pedestrians, and cannot exceed 35 feet in actual height. PERMITTED USES AND STANDARDS Single-Family Detached Min. Lot Area 4,500 sq. ft. Min. Lot Width 45' Min. Lot Depth 100' Front Yard') 15'(2)(3) Side Yard(5) 5' Rear Yard (Principal)(4) 10' Rear Yard (Accessory)(4) 5' Min. Distance Between Principal Structures 10' Maximum Height Actual 40' Zoned Height 35' 1) Front setback is measured from the property line or road easement. 2) Front-loading/front-entry garages shall be setback a minimum of 23' from the back of sidewalk. Units with side-loaded garages shall have a minimum 10' setback from the front property line/right-of-way. No structures will overhang into the utility easement. 3) Corner lots shall provide one (1) front yard setback within the yard that contains the driveway/vehicular access to the dwelling unit. The secondary front yard that does not contain the driveway/vehicular access to the dwelling unit shall provide a minimum 10-foot setback measured from the right-of-way, and will have no overhang into the utility easement if there are any buildings adjacent to that side setback. 4) 0' principal and accessory setbacks are permitted from lake maintenance easements and landscape buffer easements, which will be separate platted tracts on the PPL. GENERAL: Except as provided for herein, all criteria set forth below shall be understood to be in relation to individual parcel or lot boundary lines, or between structures. Homeowners' association boundaries shall not be utilized for determining development standards. Palisades RPUD Last Revised:April 11, 2022 Page 2 of 10 3.D.c Packet Pg. 190 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) Landscape buffers and lake maintenance easements shall be platted as separate tracts at time of subdivision plat approval, or shown as separate tracts on the SDP. Note: Nothing in this PUD document shall be deemed to approve a deviation from the LDC unless it is expressly stated in a list of deviations. Palisades RPUD Last Revised:April 11, 2022 Page 3 of 10 3.D.c Packet Pg. 191 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) I-C N2G990q/27, 9'coC0 -a oe j § \ § c 44 f § \ \± § Q z W_ § y mrn Z ® 7J2 ni « r,_,_,_,- - - - - I- - I - 1- — '-'-'- f• ' j m i r- I 222 M''''...\........ z m § \ \ j ) ) )Ica o m j $ z e2 E2 § | a@ 2 ? g I § \ \ \ \ Hcn j M . $ § i >g e & j ze&' » k 7 §M I w @i 5 I I f I d<S «> .v a ® I § § 2 y . a L,_,_,_,_,_, , ,_,_,_/ , ,22 - - 1J RyNE IF § $ 7mNE cL) ra g m M > G d r. N• P 2im t - 5 2 > k \ / o ,< ; : E - 2 §I A 2 G§f 9 f; 2-111111m....- PALISADES UD WALDROP E G1N R G PUD MASTER PLAN t OMM f c 4 3.D.cPacket Pg. 192Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) Itmq f1 §§0 4 2 m , co m2 i H \ u m 0 k k4 4 2§ e c m e m g 2 E 7 @ 0 @ ® ° Q 2 2 2 0 e , il h ƒ0 o z re01 dill' 22 kLI\ i REVISIONS PALISADES RPUD WALDROP IAI ENGINEERING PUD MASTER PLAN ENGINEERINGLANDDEVILIIMIEVE EXHIBIT C 3.D.cPacket Pg. 193Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) @ > xz < Wo ¥ ¥ az HO2 § \ § 2 r—>I m ° \ m < \ < o <c mjHmgrc ¥ § m > m > K > mm >m . w w mm m0aww00 § § § § mz Fz mz x § k00r \ \ m § j -nk § \ cw > "" 0 I . - 0 _ 0 mmKmHmwzi ) $ $ j §E / ® ° r mr Omema0000 = m2m 0 o0 § / bo > mwm - z < m -I m0 ow 3 / \ ƒ w0 >r- um >0 zo § § §z = mw a • zom ' m 0 \\ \2 > z wz § kK > \ mom H H Cr- ° O 0 ° m ® ezA o ] mmc wo \ / cm \ § 02o z m 0m oe z r m $ 0 z7x o . z 00 \y i® \ b m HmH \ 0 o 0 I > \\ tee o \ 2 0 / 2b ) / q \ Nz r z 2 m g ® _ m Cz° z ? 2 -I 008 0 m R § & X Z > 0 / w > \ Cl)- > 0 > ® oz 0 k \ rnm 0 fE \ c) \ m \ > Cl) o a ° arT1 q Cl) - t- 0 - \ \ m % 0 r > z > \ \\ E a o m z a = z = 2 7/ zjj z \ @ - » o a $ o ) ® m < > e E0 ee = ° Bxioz * m ( a -0 > _ mz 0 m 0 m- 2 0 mHEt = » f 2 z 0z Q - K m z o « o ® z ¥ = o x0 wo cf 0 \ \ 01 > 71 » _ c cc m H K K 3 = « X r m m 0 am 2 m § § 2 / Jm E m \ mm2 \ dj ; j5 r- m K k gA : § 2 w > p r K 0 CO 1 mm mmZ m Z 0 * § 0 m \ c 0 ° I oCl) C 0 k $ m C e - c m § 0 0 -n z I I @ « e > m m o r a = k 0 § 0 ) k o 3 m z a jz\ , mm >j 0 PALISADES RPUD WALDNOP G1N[R1 G j PUD MASTER PLAN E i!c r— MR KLS BOWL WRING,FL Ull5 3.D.cPacket Pg. 194Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) EXHIBIT "D" LEGAL DESCRIPTION Palisades RPUD PARCEL 1 STRAP #00237280004 THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPTING THE EAST 30 FEET THEREOF FOR ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY PURPOSES. AND PARCEL 2 STRAP #00238280003 THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS THE EAST 30 FEET THEREOF. AND PARCEL 3 STRAP #00237040008 THE WEST 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. AND PARCEL 4 STRAP #00237080000 THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS THE EAST 30 FEET THEREOF FOR ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY PURPOSES. AND PARCEL 5 STRAP #00237000006 THE SOUTH HALF (S 1/2) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW 1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE 1/4) OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPT THE EAST 30 FEET THEREOF FOR ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY PURPOSE. LESS OUT 1 THE SOUTH HALF (S1/2) OF THE SOUTH HALF (S1/2) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER NW1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE1/4) OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPT THE EAST 30 FEET THEREOF FOR ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY PURPOSES. LESS OUT 2 Palisades RPUD Last Revised:April 11, 2022 Page 7 of 10 3.D.c Packet Pg. 195 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) THE WEST 100 FEET OF THE EAST 275 FEET OF THE SOUTH 133 FEET TOGETHER WITH THE WEST 161 OF THE EAST 436 FEET OF THE SOUTH 188 FEET OF THE NORTH HALF N1/2) OF THE SOUTH HALF (S1/2) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE1/4) OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. AND PARCEL 6 STRAP #00238447008 THE WEST 100 FEET OF THE EAST 275 FEET OF THE SOUTH 133 FEET TOGETHER WITH THE WEST 161 OF THE EAST 436 FEET OF THE SOUTH 188 FEET OF THE NORTH HALF N1/2) OF THE SOUTH HALF (S1/2) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE1/4) OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. Palisades RPUD Last Revised:April 11, 2022 Page 8 of 10 3.D.c Packet Pg. 196 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) EXHIBIT "E" LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM LDC Palisades RPUD Deviation 1 from LDC Section 5.03.02.C.2, "Fences and walls", which permits a maximum fence/wall height of 6 feet in residential components of Planned Unit Development zoning districts, to allow for a maximum fence/wall/berm height of 8 feet along the PUD perimeter boundary. Deviation 2 from LDC Section 6.06.01.J, "Dead-end streets", which prohibits dead-end streets without cul-de-sacs, to allow for a hammerhead stub design as shown on the PUD master plan. Deviation 3 from LDC Section 6.06.01.N, "Minimum right-of-way widths", which establishes the minimum right-of-way width of 60 feet to be utilized, to allow for a 50-foot right-of-way internal private right-of-way. Deviation 4: A deviation from LDC Section 6.06.02.A,. "Sidewalks, Bike Lanes and Pathway Requirements", which requires five-foot wide sidewalks to be constructed on both sides of the local/internal rights-of-way, to allow a 6-foot-wide side sidewalk on one side of the right-of-way. Palisades RPUD Last Revised: April 11, 2022 Page 9 of 10 3.D.c Packet Pg. 197 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) EXHIBIT "F" DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS Palisades RPUD 1. GENERAL A. One entity (Yarberry Partners, LLC) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close- out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this PUD approval, the Managing Entity is Yarberry Partners, LLC. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments. B. Pursuant to Section 125.022(5) F.S., issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. C. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development. 2. TRANSPORTATION A. The maximum total daily trip generation for the PUD shall not exceed 38 two-way PM peak hour net trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval B. The owner, its successors or assigns, shall contribute its fair share of the future intersection improvements at Orange Blossom Drive and Airport-Pulling Road within 90 days after written request by the County. 3. ENVIRONMENTAL A. The subject site contained approximately 0.18 acres of native vegetation, of which 15% 0.03 acres) is required to be preserved. No native vegetation is provided for on-site. Off- site mitigation is to be provided through the monetary payment alternative according to LDC Sec. 3.05.07. Palisades RPUD Last Revised:April 11, 2022 Page 10 of 10 3.D.c Packet Pg. 198 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) F tou sr 44 o, 1. J FLORIDA DEPARTMENT Of STATE RON DESANTIS LAUREL M.LEE Governor Secretary of State May 31, 2022 Martha S. Vergara, BMR &VAB Senior Deputy Clerk Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court Comptroller of Collier County 3329 Tamiami Trail E, Suite#401 Naples, Florida 34112 Attention: Ann Jennejohn Dear Martha Vergara: Pursuant to the provisions of Section 125.66, Florida Statutes, this will acknowledge receipt of your electronic copy of Collier County Ordinance No. 2022-20, which was filed in this office on May 27, 2022. Sincerely, Anya Owens Program Administrator ACO/mas R. A. Gray Building • 500 South Bronough Street • Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0250 Telephone: (850) 245-6270 3.D.c Packet Pg. 199 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) Palisades RPUD PDI Hearing Package Revised Master Plan 3.D.c Packet Pg. 200 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) PROJECT BOUNDARY (TYP.) 15' TYPE "B" BUFFER 10' TYPE "A" BUFFER 15' TYPE "B" BUFFER 2 15' TYPE "D" BUFFER 3 OPTIONAL 6-8' TALL WALL/FENCE OPTIONAL 6-8' TALL WALL/FENCE OPTIONAL 6-8' TALL WALL/FENCE ARBOUR WALK CIRCLE YARBERRY LANE(2 LANE LOCAL ROAD)RESIDENTIAL TRACT RESIDENTIAL TRACT LAKE MILL RUN CIRCLE RESIDENTIAL TRACT USE: MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING: PUD (KEYSTONE PLACE) FLU: URBAN RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION USE: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING: RSF-1 FLU: URBAN RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT USE: CHRUCH ZONING: RSF-1 FLU: URBAN RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT USE: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING: PUD (SLEEPY HOLLOW) FLU: URBAN RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT 4 3 1 1 1 REQUIRED 6'-8' TALL WALLWA L L S E C T I O N AWA L L S E C T I O N B WALL SECTION A WALL SECTION B WALL SECTION AWALL SECTION B PALISADES AVENUENEWPORT ROADWA L L S E C T IO N BWALL SECTION AEXHIBIT C1 of 4 0 SCALE IN FEET 30 60 120WALDROPENGINEERINGCIVIL ENGINEERING &LAND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTSSET NUMBER: SHEET :28100 BONITA GRANDE DRIVE - SUITE 305 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135P: 239-405-7777 F: 239-405-7899 EMAIL: info@waldropengineering.comB:\Projects\1272-200 (Palisades) Plans & Permitting\Drawings-Exhibits\1272-200-02 MCP\Current Plans\12722000207.dwg9/25/2023 9:25:01 AM10/27/2021REVISED PER CLIENT AND COUNTY COMMENTSPUD MASTER PLANPALISADES RPUDFLORIDA CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION #8636PLAN REVISIONSREV00 <<SUBMITTED / BID SET>> XX/XX/XX1272-200-021LEGEND LAKE VEHICULAR INGRESS AND EGRESS #DEVIATION 212/20/2021REVISED PER CLIENT AND COUNTY COMMENTS306/19/2023REVISED PER CLIENT AND COUNTY COMMENTS408/03/2023REVISED PER CLIENT AND COUNTY COMMENTS509/25/2023REVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS3.D.c Packet Pg. 201 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) 50.0' RIGHT OF WAY 2.0'10.0' TRAVEL LANE 10.0' TRAVEL LANE 2.0'4.0'5.0' SIDEWALK 4.0' VALLEY GUTTER (TYP) 4.0'5.0' SIDEWALK 4.0' TYPICAL 50' ROW CROSS SECTION N.T.S. 2% MAX 2% MAX2%2% 10.0' PUE 10.0' PUE 3 50.0' RIGHT OF WAY 2.0'10.0' TRAVEL LANE 10.0' TRAVEL LANE 2.0'4.0'6.0' SIDEWALK 3.0' VALLEY GUTTER (TYP) SIDEWALK DEVIATION CROSS SECTION N.T.S. 2% MAX2%2% 10.0' PUE 10.0' PUE 4 13.0'EXHIBIT C2 of 4 NOT TO SCALEWALDROPENGINEERING CIVIL ENGINEERING &LAND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTSSET NUMBER: SHEET :28100 BONITA GRANDE DRIVE - SUITE 305 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135P: 239-405-7777 F: 239-405-7899 EMAIL: info@waldropengineering.comB:\Projects\1272-200 (Palisades) Plans & Permitting\Drawings-Exhibits\1272-200-02 MCP\Current Plans\12722000207.dwg9/25/2023 9:25:02 AMPUD MASTER PLANPALISADES RPUDFLORIDA CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION #8636PLAN REVISIONSREV00 <<SUBMITTED / BID SET>> XX/XX/XX1272-200-0210/27/2021REVISED PER CLIENT AND COUNTY COMMENTS1212/20/2021REVISED PER CLIENT AND COUNTY COMMENTS3.D.c Packet Pg. 202 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) TYPICAL WALL CROSS SECTION B-B N.T.S. CONTROL ELEVATION = 9.90 (FT-NAVD) ELEV. VARIES = 14.10-14.80 NAVD ACCESSORY STRUCTURE = 15.85 - 17.55 NAVD PERIMETER BERM ELEV. = 15.30 MIN. NAVD PERIMETER BERM ELEV. = 15.85 MAX. NAVD (25 YR. MIN. BERM ELEV. = 14.10 NAVD) PROPOSED 12" HDPE DRAINAGE * OPTIONAL 6.7' WALL 3:1 MA X LOT LINE BUFFER VARIES 7.0'5.0' MATCH LOWEST EXISTING ELEV. = 8.88 - 9.79 NAVD 15.0' DRAINAGE EASEMENT SILT FENCE STEM WALL IF NEEDED ELEV. = 14.10 MIN. NAVD ELEV.= 14.60 MAX. NAVD VARIES 4:1 MAX 4:1 MAX5.1' MIN.6.7' MAX.* THE FENCE / WALL IS NOT OPTIONAL ALONG THE WEST PROPERTY LINE. 1 1.5' PROPERTY BOUNDARY TYPICAL WALL CROSS SECTION A-A N.T.S. 1 * THE FENCE / WALL IS NOT OPTIONAL ALONG THE WEST PROPERTY LINE. FFE ELEV. = 17.90 NAVD ELEV. = 14.5 - 15.6 NAVD * OPTIONAL 6.6' WALL CONTROL ELEVATION = 9.90 (FT-NAVD) APPROXIMATE EXISTING GRADE MATCH LOWEST EXISTING ELEV. = 9.79 - 10.00 NAVD 2% MIN. PERIMETER BERM ELEV. = 15.30 MIN. NAVD PERIMETER BERM ELEV. = 15.85 MAX. NAVD (25 YR. MIN. BERM ELEV. = 14.10 NAVD) PROPERTY BOUNDARY SILT FENCE LOT LINE 3:1 MA X 4:1 MAX ELEV. = 14.10 MIN. NAVD ELEV.= 14.60 MAX. NAVD BUFFER VARIES 1.5'VARIES 5.0' SIDE SETBACK VARIESVARIES 4.9' MIN.6.6' MAX.4:1 MAX EXHIBIT C3 of 4 NOT TO SCALEWALDROPENGINEERING CIVIL ENGINEERING &LAND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTSSET NUMBER: SHEET :28100 BONITA GRANDE DRIVE - SUITE 305 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135P: 239-405-7777 F: 239-405-7899 EMAIL: info@waldropengineering.comB:\Projects\1272-200 (Palisades) Plans & Permitting\Drawings-Exhibits\1272-200-02 MCP\Current Plans\12722000207.dwg9/25/2023 9:25:03 AMPUD MASTER PLANPALISADES RPUDFLORIDA CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION #8636PLAN REVISIONSREV00 <<SUBMITTED / BID SET>> XX/XX/XX1272-200-0210/27/2021REVISED PER CLIENT AND COUNTY COMMENTS1212/20/2021REVISED PER CLIENT AND COUNTY COMMENTS306/19/2023REVISED PER CLIENT AND COUNTY COMMENTS408/03/2023REVISED PER CLIENT AND COUNTY COMMENTS3.D.c Packet Pg. 203 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) EXHIBIT C4 of 4 NOT TO SCALEWALDROPENGINEERING CIVIL ENGINEERING &LAND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTSSET NUMBER: SHEET :28100 BONITA GRANDE DRIVE - SUITE 305 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135P: 239-405-7777 F: 239-405-7899 EMAIL: info@waldropengineering.comB:\Projects\1272-200 (Palisades) Plans & Permitting\Drawings-Exhibits\1272-200-02 MCP\Current Plans\12722000207.dwg11/16/2023 11:19:15 AMPUD MASTER PLANPALISADES RPUDFLORIDA CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION #8636PLAN REVISIONSREV00 <<SUBMITTED / BID SET>> XX/XX/XX1272-200-02 NOTES: 1. THIS PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND IS SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION DUE TO AGENCY PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS. 2. ALL ACREAGES ARE APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION AT THE TIME OF SDP OR PLAT APPROVAL. 3. THE SUBJECT SITE CONTAINED APPROXIMATELY 0.18 ACRES OF NATIVE VEGETATION, OF WHICH 15% (.03 ACRES) IS REQUIRED TO BE PRESERVED. NO NATIVE VEGETATION IS PROVIDED FOR ON-SITE. OFF-SITE MITIGATION TO BE PROVIDED PER LDC SEC 3.05.07. 4. THE LOCATION OF THE ONSITE LAKE AND RESIDENTIAL TRACTS IS PRELIMINARY AND MAY BE ADJUSTED AT SITE PLAN APPROVAL. 5. RPUD IS PERMITTED FOR A MAXIMUM OF 36 DWELLING UNITS (3 DU/ACRE) LAND USE SUMMARY RESIDENTIAL 6.1 AC RIGHT-OF-WAY 1.5 AC LAKE 1.7 AC OTHER OPEN SPACE 2.7 AC TOTAL 12.0 +/- AC DEVIATION 1 FROM LDC SECTION 5.03.02.C.2, "FENCES AND WALLS", WHICH PERMITS A MAXIMUM FENCE/WALL HEIGHT OF 6 FEET IN RESIDENTIAL COMPONENTS OF PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICTS, TO ALLOW FOR A MAXIMUM FENCE/WALL/BERM HEIGHT OF 12.50 FEET ALONG THE PUD PERIMETER BOUNDARY. DEVIATION 2 FROM LDC SECTION 6.06.01J, "DEAD-END STREETS", WHICH PROHIBITS DEAD-END STREETS WITHOUT CUL-DE-SACS, TO ALLOW FOR A HAMMERHEAD STUB DESIGN AS SHOWN ON THE PUD MASTER PLAN. DEVIATION 3 FROM LDC SECTION 6.06.01.N, MINIMUM RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTHS", WHICH ESTABLISHES THE MINIMUM RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH OF 60 FEET TO BE UTILIZED, TO ALLOW FOR A 50-FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY INTERNAL PRIVATE RIGHT-OF-WAY. DEVIATION 4: A DEVIATION FROM LDC SECTION 6.06.02A,. "SIDEWALKS, BIKE LANE, AND PATHWAY REQUIREMENTS", WHICH REQUIRES FIVE-FOOT WIDE SIDEWALKS TO BE CONSTRUCTED ON BOTH SIDES OF THE LOCAL/INTERNAL RIGHTS-OF-WAY, TO ALLOW A 6-FOOT-WIDE SIDE SIDEWALK ON ONE SIDE OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. OPEN SPACE SUMMARY REQUIRED OPEN SPACE 7.2 AC PROVIDED OPEN SPACE 7.2 AC 10/27/2021REVISED PER CLIENT AND COUNTY COMMENTS1212/20/2021REVISED PER CLIENT AND COUNTY COMMENTS408/03/2023REVISED PER CLIENT AND COUNTY COMMENTS3.D.c Packet Pg. 204 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) Palisades RPUD PDI Hearing Package Revised PUD Document 3.D.c Packet Pg. 205 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) Palisades RPUD Words struck-through are deleted; PL20230011202 Words underlined are added Last Revised: November 13, 2023 Page 1 of 1 EXHIBIT “E” LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM LDC Palisades RPUD Deviation 1 from LDC Section 5. 03.02. C.2, "Fences and walls", which permits a maximum fence/wall height of 6 feet in residential components of Planned Unit Development zoning districts, to allow for a maximum fence/wall/berm height of 8 12.50 feet along the PUD perimeter boundary. Deviation 2 from LDC Section 6. 06. 01. J, "Dead- end streets", which prohibits dead- end streets without cul- de- sacs, to allow for a hammerhead stub design as shown on the PUD master plan. Deviation 3 from LDC Section 6. 06. 01. N, "Minimum right - of- way widths", which establishes the minimum right- of-way width of 60 feet to be utilized, to allow for a 50- foot right- of-way internal private right- of-way. Deviation 4: A deviation from LDC Section 6. 06. 02. A,. "Sidewalks, Bike Lanes and Pathway Requirements", which requires five-foot wide sidewalks to be constructed on both sides of the local/ internal rights- of-way, to allow a 6- foot-wide side sidewalk on one side of the right- of-way. 3.D.c Packet Pg. 206 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) Palisades RPUD PDI Hearing Package Deviations and Justifications 3.D.c Packet Pg. 207 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) Page 1 PALISADES RPD PDI Deviations and Justifications Deviation 1 from LDC Section 5.03.02.C.2, " Fences and walls", which permits a maximum fence/wall height of 6 feet in residential components of Planned Unit Development zoning districts, to allow for a maximum fence/wall/berm height of 8 12.50 feet along the PUD perimeter boundary. Justification: This deviation was previously approved with a maximum fence/wall/berm height of 8 feet. As described in the attached cover letter and project narrative, a surveying error resulted in the actual constructed berm and wall height to be a maximum of 12.5 feet. When originally approved, the cross section demonstrated several elevations. The elevation at the property boundary was identified as 10.25 NAVD and the perimeter berm elevation was identified as 15.25 NAVD. Additionally, the deviation allowed for a maximum wall height of 6-8 feet. As a result, Ordinance 2022-20 depicted the potential for a maximum fence/wall/berm height of 13 feet. This amendment to the previously approved deviation codifies the actual combined fence/wall height and approval of this deviation request will not negatively impact the public health, safety, or welfare as the proposed access points will provide adequate ingress and egress to the Property. No changes to Deviations 2 – 4. 3.D.c Packet Pg. 208 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) Palisades RPUD PDI Hearing Package Warranty Deed 3.D.c Packet Pg. 209 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) 3.D.c Packet Pg. 210 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) 3.D.c Packet Pg. 211 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) 3.D.c Packet Pg. 212 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) 3.D.c Packet Pg. 213 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) 3.D.c Packet Pg. 214 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) 3.D.c Packet Pg. 215 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) 3.D.c Packet Pg. 216 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) 3.D.c Packet Pg. 217 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) 3.D.c Packet Pg. 218 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) 3.D.c Packet Pg. 219 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) 3.D.c Packet Pg. 220 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) 3.D.c Packet Pg. 221 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) 3.D.c Packet Pg. 222 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) 3.D.c Packet Pg. 223 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) Palisades RPUD PDI Hearing Package Plat Book Pages 3.D.c Packet Pg. 224 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) 3.D.c Packet Pg. 225 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) 3.D.c Packet Pg. 226 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) Palisades RPUD PDI Hearing Package Affidavit of Authorization 3.D.c Packet Pg. 227 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) ______________________ _ I, William Price Jr. (print name), as Manager (title, if applicable) of Yarberry Parrtners, LLC (company, If applicable}, swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner�applicant!Z]contract purchaser0and that: *Notes: 1.I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2.All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3.I have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4.The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5.We/I authorize RVI Planning and Landscape Architecture to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. •If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres. or v. pres. •If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." •If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. •If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner" of the named partnership. •If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee". •In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of per".u.cy, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts state Signature STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER 6/20/23 Date ,. The foregoing instrument was acknowleged before me by means of �hysical presence or D onli�e notarization this Zi day of }\.l tJE; , 20.l.3, by (printed name of owner or qualifier) iv\AJTH�vJ C. PR\(£ Such person(s) Notary Public must check applicable box: �Are personally known to me D Has produced a current drivers license �-----□Has produced ----�----as identification. Notary Signature:--�------------------- CP\08-COA-00115\155 REV 3/4/2020 ta PL20230011202 3.D.c Packet Pg. 228 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) Palisades RPUD PDI Hearing Package Addressing Checklist 3.D.c Packet Pg. 229 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) Addressing Checklist (Rev 10/2022) Page 1 of 1 Operations & Regulatory Management Division ● 2800 North Horseshoe Drive ● Naples, FL 34104 ● 239-252-2400 www.colliercountyfl.gov ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following and upload via the CityView Portal with your submittal. Items marked with (*) are required for every application, other items are optional and may not apply to every project. Forms are valid for 6 months following their submittal; an updated form will be required for a new submittal after that timeframe and any time the properties within the project boundary are modified. Additional documents may be attached to this form and can include: -* LOCATION MAP and/or SURVEY showing the proposed project boundary. -List of additional folio numbers and associated legal descriptions. - E-mail from Addressing Official for any pre-approved project and/or street names. LOCATION INFORMATION *FOLIO (Property ID) Number(s) of subject property or properties. [Attach list if necessary] *LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties. [Attach list if necessary] STREET ADDRESS(ES) where applicable, if already assigned. PROJECT INFORMATION Acceptance of this form does not constitute project and/or street name approval and is subject to further review by the Addressing Official. Pre-Approval may be requested by contacting us at GMD_Addressing@colliercountyfl.gov or 239-252-2482 prior to your submittal. CURRENT PROJECT NAME PROPOSED PROJECT NAME PROPOSED STREET NAME(s) LATEST APPROVED PROJECT NUMBER [e.g., SDP-94-##, PPL-2002-AR-####, PL2017000####] 3.D.c Packet Pg. 230 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Collier County Proper ty AppraiserProperty Summar y Parcel No 64980000069 Site Address*Disclaimer 6623 YARBERRY LN Site City NAPLES Site Zone*Note 34109 Name / Address YARBERRY PARTNERS LLC 259 TURNPIKE RD STE 100 City SOUTHBOROUGH State MA Zip 01772 Map No.Strap No.Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 4A02 531650 TR OS14A02 2 49 25 1.88 Legal PALISADES TRACT 0S1 Millage Area 133 Millage Rates *Calculations Sub./Condo 531650 - PALISADES School Other Total Use Code 97 - OUTDOOR RECREATIONAL OR PARKLANDSUBJECT 4.459 6.0042 10.4632 Latest Sales Histor y (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 2022 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value (+) Improved Value (=) Market Value (=) Assessed Value (=) School Taxable Value (=) Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll 3.D.c Packet Pg. 231 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) Folio Number: 64980000069 Name: YARBERRY PARTNERS LLC Street# & Name: 6623 YARBERRY LN Build# / Unit#: TR / OS1 Legal Description: PALISADES TRACT 0S1 2004. Collier County Property Appraiser. While the Collier County Property Appraiser is committed to providing the most accurate and up-to-date information, no warranties expressed or implied are provided for the data herein, its use, or its interpretation. 3.D.c Packet Pg. 232 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) Palisades RPUD PDI Hearing Package Property Ownership Disclosure 3.D.c Packet Pg. 233 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) 3.D.c Packet Pg. 234 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) 3.D.c Packet Pg. 235 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) 3.D.c Packet Pg. 236 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) Palisades RPUD PDI Hearing Package NIM Summary 3.D.c Packet Pg. 237 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) Page 1 PALISADES RPD PDI NIM Summary RVi Planning + Landscape Architecture conducted a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) for the Palisades RPD PDI. The meeting was held on Thursday, November 16, 2023, at 5:05 p.m. at the The sign-in sheets are attached as Exhibit “A”. One attendee came to the meeting, as well Collier County Staff. A copy of the legal notice, affidavit of publication, a copy of the letter sent to surrounding property owners, and a list of the surrounding property owners are attached as Exhibit “B”. Jem Frantz started the meeting by introducing the project team and provided a PowerPoint presentation, attached as Exhibit “C,” on the Palisades RPUD and the proposed amendments. She explained there are no changes proposed to the allowed uses and no increase to the allowed density or intensity as part of this amendment. The proposed amendment includes revisions to the cross sections in Exhibit C of the Master Plan, revisions to the maximum wall height, and a revision to deviation 1 to reflect the as-built conditions. The updated Master Plan was presented and a handout was distributed as Exhibit “D”. Following the presentation, questions were asked by the attendee and responses were provided as outlined below. Public Comment Summary: 1. Clarified that because the wall was not as tall as expected, there were additional plantings to create more distinction between the two properties. RESPONSE: Correct. 2. Did we acquire any additional land to add to the PUD? RESPONSE: No 3. Were the additional trees and shrubs already planted? RESPONSE: Yes. 4. So this change is not very impactful to neighbors? RESPONSE: Due to the additional plantings, we think any potential impact has been mitigated already. There were no further comments and the meeting concluded at approximately 5:25 p.m. 3.D.c Packet Pg. 238 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) Exhibit A – Sign In Sheet 3.D.c Packet Pg. 239 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) 3.D.cPacket Pg. 240Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) Exhibit B – Meeting Notice 3.D.c Packet Pg. 241 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) +N EWS-PRESS.COM |WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 1, 2023 |21A $UF\OLF:LQGRZ 6SHFLDOLVW )DPLO\2ZQHG2SHUDWHG ZZZVKDUNH\VZLQGRZVFRP $5DWLQJZLWK%%%<HDUV /LFHQVHG,QVXUHG *2/’(1’22’/( 0,1,$785(3833,(6 +RPH5DLVHGb <+HDOWK&HUW 6KRWbb mini cockapoo Born 9/25, raised in home, great family dogs, vet check, shots, par- ents on site, visits welcome, 1500 Fort Myers FL 508-838- 7931 All classified ads are subject to the applicable rate card, copies of which are available from our Advertising Dept. All ads are subject to approval before publication. Fort Myers News-Press reserves the right to edit, refuse, reject, classify or cancel any ad at any time. Errors must be reported in the first day of publication. Fort Myers News-Press shall not be liable for any loss or expense that results from an error in or omission of an advertisement. No refunds for early cancellation of order. TO ADVERTISE Visit Our Website: classifieds.news-press.com Classifieds To Advertise, visit our website:classifieds.news-press.com n Public Notices/Legals email:fnplegals@gannett.com n Business & Services, visit:classifieds.news-press.com n To post job openings, visit:news-press.com/jobs www YO Check out the classified ads everyday. Looking to Buy a Car? Vehicles Recreation RVs, motorcycles, etc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’RZG 5HVL GHQFH 3DOP $YHQXH %RFD *UDQGH)/ 5HTXHVWIRUD6SHFLDO&HUWLILFDWHRI $SSURSULDWHQHVV WR DOORZ DGGLWLRQV WR DQ H[LVWLQJ UHVLGHQFH WR LQFOXGH H[SDQVLRQ RI WKH JDUDJH HQFORVXUH RIWKHVSDFHEHWZHHQWKHJDUDJHDQG PDLQ VWUXFWXUH FRQVWUXFWLRQ RI D VHFRQGIORRUDERYHWKHJDUDJHDQG HQFORVXUH RI WKH VRXWKZHVW FRYHUHG GHFN ,WHPVE\WKH3XEOLF $%RFD*UDQGH&RPPXQLW\&HQWHU 3URSRVDO %RDUG0HPEHUV ,WHPVE\6WDII $ 3HQGLQJ +LVWRULF &DVHV ZKHUH WKH\DUHLQWKHSURFHVV $GMRXUQPHQW 1H[W 0HHWLQJ ’DWH’HFHPEHU b $YHUEDWLPUHFRUGRIWKHSURFHHGLQJ ZLOO EH QHFHVVDU\ WR DSSHDO D GHFL VLRQPDGHDWWKLVKHDULQJ /HH &RXQW\ ZLOO QRW GLVFULPLQDWH b 7KH &LW\ RI )RUW 0\HUV LV VHHNLQJ SURSRVDOV IRU ZKLFKZLOOEHVXEPLW WHG HOHFWURQLFDOO\ RQ RU EHIRUH DW 30 ,QWHUHVWHG SDUWLFLSDQWV DUH HQFRXUDJHG WR GRZQORDGWKHVROLFLWDWLRQGRFXPHQWV )RU PRUH GHWDLOV YLVLW KWWSVSEV\VWHPSODQHWELGVFRPSRU WDOSRUWDO KRPH b 7KH&LW\LVVHHNLQJ)’27SUHTXDOL ILHGFRQVXOWDQWLQZRUNW\SHV D :RUN *URXS +LJKZD\ ’HVLJQ 5RDGZD\ FDWHJRULHV 0LQRU +LJKZD\’HVLJQ E:RUN*URXS+LJKZD\’HVLJQ %ULGJHV0LQRU%ULGJH’HVLJQ F :RUN *URXS 6XUYH\LQJ DQG 0DSSLQJ ’HVLJQ 5LJKWRI:D\ &RQVWUXFWLRQ6XUYH\LQJ G :RUN *URXS 6RLO ([SORUDWLRQ 0DWHULDO 7HVWLQJ DQG )RXQGDWLRQV 6WDQGDUG)RXQGDWLRQ6WXGLHV b 0DUW\./DZLQJ&LW\0DQDJHU *ZHQ&DUOLVOH&LW\&OHUN $Gb 1257+&$52/,1$ $/$0$1&(&2817< ,17+(*(1(5$/&28572) -867,&( 683(5,25&2857’,9,6,21 %()25(7+(&/(5. 63 ,QUH’RH 127,&(2)),/,1*2)3(7,7,21 )25$’237,21 >1&*6@ 3OHDVH WDNH QRWLFH WKDW D 6SHFLDO 3URFHHGLQJ KDV EHHQ FRPPHQFHG DJDLQVW\RXLQWKHDERYHUHIHUHQFHG FRXUW DQG ILOH 7KH 3HWLWLRQHUV KHUHLQ DUH VHHNLQJ WR DGRSW WKH PLQRUFKLOGDPDOHERUQRQ0D\ LQ /HEDQRQ 0LVVRXUL WR .DUD ’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ublic Notices 5LYHUGDOH +LJK 6FKRRO 5HQRYDWLRQ DQG$GGLWLRQ3KDVH,,%,QYLWDWLRQWR %LG 6XIIRON &RQVWUXFWLRQ ZLOO UHFHLYH VHDOHG SURSRVDOV DW &KHYUROHW :D\ 6XLWH (VWHUR )/ SULRU WR SP RQ :HGQHVGD\ 1RYHPEHU WK IURP FRPSDQLHV ZLVKLQJ WR SURYLGH *03 SULFLQJ IRU 5LYHUGDOH +LJK 6FKRRO 5HQRYDWLRQ DQG $GGLWLRQ 3KDVH,,%IRU7KH6FKRRO’LVWULFWRI /HH&RXQW\$3UH%LG0HHWLQJDQG 6LWH:DONWKURXJKZLOOEHKHOGDW SP DW 5LYHUGDOH +LJK 6FKRRO RQ 2FWREHUPHHWDWIODJSROH %LGGHUVDUHDVNHGQRWWRFRPHRQWR WKHVFKRROJURXQGVEHIRUHSP RQWKHGD\RIWKH3UH%LG0HHWLQJ 6ROLFLWDWLRQ GRFXPHQWV DQG LQVWUXFWLRQV PD\ EH VHFXUHG IURP 6XIIRON &RQVWUXFWLRQ WKURXJK DQ HPDLO UHTXHVW WR -HVVLFD 6Q\GHU DW -6Q\GHU#VXIIRONFRP RU E\ FDOOLQJ 6XIIRON&RQVWUXFWLRQDW WKUXbb Bids & Proposals 7KH %RDUG RI 6XSHUYLVRUV RI WKH &)0 &RPPXQLW\ ’HYHORSPHQW ’LVWULFW ’LVWULFW ZLOO KROG D PHHWLQJRQ7KXUVGD\1RYHPEHU DW DP DW WKH RIILFH RI 5L]]HWWD&RPSDQ\,QFORFDWHGDW 0DUNHWSODFH 5RDG 6XLWH )RUW0\HUV)ORULGD$FRS\RI WKH DJHQGD IRU WKH PHHWLQJ FDQ EH REWDLQHGIURPWKH’LVWULFW2IILFHDW 0DUNHWSODFH 5RDG 6XLWH )RUW 0\HUV )ORULGD RU E\ SKRQHDW$GGLWLRQDOO\ DFRS\RIWKHDJHQGDDORQJZLWKDQ\ PHHWLQJ PDWHULDOV DYDLODEOH LQ DQ HOHFWURQLFIRUPDWPD\EHREWDLQHG DW ZZZFIPFGGRUJ ,WHPV RQ WKH DJHQGD PD\ LQFOXGH EXW DUH QRW OLPLWHG WR ’LVWULFW RSHUDWLRQV DQG PDLQWHQDQFH DFWLYLWLHV ILQDQFLDO PDWWHUVFDSLWDOLPSURYHPHQWVDQG JHQHUDODGPLQLVWUDWLRQDFWLYLWLHV 7KH PHHWLQJ LV RSHQ WR WKH SXEOLF DQGZLOOEHFRQGXFWHGLQDFFRUGDQFH ZLWK WKH SURYLVLRQV RI )ORULGD ODZ 7KHUHPD\EHRFFDVLRQVZKHQRQHRU PRUH %RDUG 6XSHUYLVRUV RU VWDII PHPEHUV ZLOO SDUWLFLSDWH E\ WHOH SKRQH $ VSHDNHU WHOHSKRQH ZLOO EH SUHVHQWDWWKHDERYHORFDWLRQVRWKDW DQ\ %RDUG 6XSHUYLVRU RU VWDII PHPEHUFDQDWWHQGWKHPHHWLQJE\ 7KH%RDUGRI6XSHUYLVRUV%RDUG RI WKH :LOG%OXH &RPPXQLW\ ’HYHO RSPHQW ’LVWULFW ’LVWULFW ZLOO KROGD5HJXODU0HHWLQJRQ1RYHP EHU DW DP DW WKH RIILFHV RI %DUUDFR DQG $VVRFLDWHV 0F*UHJRU%RXOHYDUG6XLWH )RUW0\HUV)ORULGD 7KH SXUSRVH RI WKH PHHWLQJ LV IRU WKH %RDUG WR FRQVLGHU DQ\ EXVLQHVV ZKLFKPD\SURSHUO\FRPHEHIRUHLW 7KH PHHWLQJ LV RSHQ WR WKH SXEOLF DQGZLOOEHFRQGXFWHGLQDFFRUGDQFH ZLWK WKH SURYLVLRQ RI )ORULGD ODZ 7KHPHHWLQJPD\EHFRQWLQXHGWRD GDWHWLPHDQGSODFHWREHVSHFLILHG RQWKHUHFRUGDWWKHPHHWLQJ$FRS\ RIWKHDJHQGDIRUWKHVHPHHWLQJPD\ EHREWDLQHGE\FRQWDFWLQJWKHRIILFHV RI WKH ’LVWULFW 0DQDJHU :UDWKHOO +XQW$VVRFLDWHV//&*ODGHV 5RDG 6XLWH : %RFD 5DWRQ )ORULGDGXULQJ QRUPDOEXVLQHVVKRXUVRUE\YLVLWLQJ WKH ’LVWULFWV ZHEVLWH KWWSZLOGEOXHFGGQHW 7KHUHPD\EHRFFDVLRQVZKHQRQHRU PRUH 6XSHUYLVRUV RU VWDII ZLOO SDUWLFLSDWH E\ WHOHSKRQH 3XUVXDQW WRSURYLVLRQVRIWKH$PHULFDQVZLWK ’LVDELOLWLHV $FW DQ\ SHUVRQ UHTXLU LQJ VSHFLDO DFFRPPRGDWLRQV DW WKH PHHWLQJ EHFDXVH RI D GLVDELOLW\ RU SK\VLFDOLPSDLUPHQWVKRXOGFRQWDFW WKH ’LVWULFW 2IILFH DW DWOHDVWKRXUVSULRUWRWKHPHHW LQJ ,I \RX DUH KHDULQJ RU VSHHFK LPSDLUHGSOHDVHFRQWDFWWKH)ORULGD 5HOD\6HUYLFHE\GLDOLQJRU 77< 9RLFH IRU DLG LQ FRQWDFWLQJ WKH ’LVWULFW2IILFH $SHUVRQZKRGHFLGHVWRDSSHDODQ\ GHFLVLRQ PDGH DW WKH PHHWLQJ ZLWK UHVSHFWWRDQ\PDWWHUFRQVLGHUHGDW WKH PHHWLQJ LV DGYLVHG WKDW SHUVRQ ZLOO QHHG D UHFRUG RI WKH SURFHHG LQJV DQG WKDW DFFRUGLQJO\ WKH SHUVRQ PD\ QHHG WR HQVXUH WKDW D YHUEDWLPUHFRUGRIWKHSURFHHGLQJV LV PDGH LQFOXGLQJ WKH WHVWLPRQ\ DQG HYLGHQFH XSRQ ZKLFK VXFK DSSHDOLVWREHEDVHG ’LVWULFW0DQDJHU 1RY 7KH %RDUGV RI 6XSHUYLVRUV %RDUGV RI WKH %URRNV RI %RQLWD 6SULQJV DQG %URRNV RI %RQLWD 6SULQJV,,&RPPXQLW\’HYHORSPHQW ’LVWULFWV ’LVWULFWV ZLOO KROG D -RLQW6SHFLDO0HHWLQJRQ1RYHPEHU DW SP DW 7KH &RPPRQV &OXE DW 7KH %URRNV (QULFKPHQW &HQWHU &RFRQXW 5RDG%RQLWD6SULQJV)ORULGD IRU WKH SXUSRVH RI FRQVLGHULQJ D MRLQWSURSRVDOIRUWKH&RPPRQV&OXE WRDFTXLUH&RFRQXW3DUNDVZHOODV FRQVLGHU DQ\ RWKHU EXVLQHVV ZKLFK PD\ SURSHUO\ FRPH EHIRUH WKH %RDUGV 7KH PHHWLQJ LV RSHQ WR WKH SXEOLF DQGZLOOEHFRQGXFWHGLQDFFRUGDQFH ZLWK WKH SURYLVLRQ RI )ORULGD /DZ IRU &RPPXQLW\ ’HYHORSPHQW ’LVWULFWV 7KH PHHWLQJ PD\ EH FRQWLQXHGWRDGDWHWLPHDQGSODFH WREHVSHFLILHGRQWKHUHFRUGDWWKH PHHWLQJ $ FRS\ RI WKH DJHQGD IRU WKH PHHWLQJ PD\ EH REWDLQHG IURP WKH RIILFH RI WKH ’LVWULFW 0DQDJHU :UDWKHOO +XQW $VVRFLDWHV //& *ODGHV5RDG6XLWH:%RFD 5DWRQ )ORULGD DW OHDVW VHYHQ GD\VLQDGYDQFHRIWKHPHHWLQJ E\ FDOOLQJ GXULQJ QRUPDO EXVLQHVV KRXUV RU E\ YLVLW LQJ WKH ’LVWULFWV ZHEVLWH KWWSVZZZEURRNVFGGVQHW 7KHUHPD\EHRFFDVLRQVZKHQRQHRU PRUH 6XSHUYLVRUV RU VWDII ZLOO SDUWLFLSDWH E\ WHOHSKRQH 3XUVXDQW WRSURYLVLRQVRIWKH$PHULFDQVZLWK ’LVDELOLWLHV $FW DQ\ SHUVRQ UHTXLU LQJ VSHFLDO DFFRPPRGDWLRQV DW WKLV PHHWLQJ EHFDXVH RI D GLVDELOLW\ RU SK\VLFDOLPSDLUPHQWVKRXOGFRQWDFW WKH ’LVWULFW 2IILFH DW DWOHDVWKRXUVSULRUWRWKHPHHW LQJ ,I \RX DUH KHDULQJ RU VSHHFK LPSDLUHGSOHDVHFRQWDFWWKH)ORULGD 5HOD\6HUYLFHE\GLDOLQJRU 77< 9RLFH IRU DLG LQ FRQWDFWLQJ WKH ’LVWULFW2IILFH $SHUVRQZKRGHFLGHVWRDSSHDODQ\ GHFLVLRQ PDGH DW WKH PHHWLQJ ZLWK UHVSHFWWRDQ\PDWWHUFRQVLGHUHGDW WKH PHHWLQJ LV DGYLVHG WKDW SHUVRQ ZLOO QHHG D UHFRUG RI WKH SURFHHG LQJV DQG WKDW DFFRUGLQJO\ WKH SHUVRQ PD\ QHHG WR HQVXUH WKDW D YHUEDWLPUHFRUGRIWKHSURFHHGLQJV LV PDGH LQFOXGLQJ WKH WHVWLPRQ\ DQG HYLGHQFH XSRQ ZKLFK VXFK DSSHDOLVWREHEDVHG ’LVWULFW0DQDJHU 1RY VLRQPDGHDWWKLVKHDULQJ /HH &RXQW\ ZLOO QRW GLVFULPLQDWH DJDLQVWLQGLYLGXDOVZLWKGLVDELOLWLHV 7R UHTXHVW DQ DFFRPPRGDWLRQ FRQWDFW -RDQ /D*XDUGLD )ORULGD 5HOD\ 6HUYLFH RU $’$UHTXHVWV#OHHJRYFRP DW OHDVW ILYH EXVLQHVV GD\V LQ DGYDQFH 7KH DJHQGD FDQ EH DFFHVVHG DW WKH IROORZLQJOLQNDSSUR[LPDWHO\GD\V SULRU WR WKH PHHWLQJ KWWSZZZOHHJRYFRPGFG(YHQWV 7R UHFHLYH DJHQGDV E\ HPDLO FRQWDFWMPLOOHU#OHHJRYFRP 1RY Public Notices $*(1’$$FRS\RIWKH$JHQGDFDQEHREWDLQHGIURPWKH/HH+HDOWKRUJ ZHEVLWHXQGHUWKH %RDUGRI’LUHFWRUVSDJH 38%/,&$77(1’$1&(7KHSXEOLFLVHQFRXUDJHGWRDWWHQGE\WHOHFRQIHU HQFH$FFHVVWRWKH PHHWLQJFDQEHREWDLQHGE\XWLOL]LQJWKHIROORZLQJGLDOLQQXPEHU 7(/(&21)(5(1&(&$//’,$/,1 &21)(5(1&(&2’( $0(5,&$16:,7+’,6$%,/,7,(6$&73XUVXDQWWRWKHSURYLVLRQVRIWKH $PHULFDQVZLWKb’LVDELOLWLHV$FWDQ\SHUVRQUHTXLULQJVSHFLDODFFRPPRGD WLRQVWRSDUWLFLSDWHLQWKHPHHWLQJLVbUHTXHVWHGWRDGYLVHWKH%RDUGRI’LUHF WRUVDWOHDVWWZRGD\VEHIRUHWKHPHHWLQJE\FRQWDFWLQJWKHb%RDUGRIILFHDW RUYLDHPDLOVHQWWRWKHIROORZLQJHPDLODGGUHVVb%RDUGRI’L UHFWRUV#OHHKHDOWKRUJ 5(&25’,IDSHUVRQGHFLGHVWRDSSHDODQ\GHFLVLRQPDGHE\WKH%RDUGRI ’LUHFWRUVZLWKUHVSHFWbWRDQ\PDWWHUFRQVLGHUHGDWVXFKPHHWLQJRUKHDULQJ KHRUVKHZLOOQHHGDUHFRUGRIWKHbSURFHHGLQJVDQGWKDWIRUVXFKSXUSRVH KHRUVKHPD\QHHGWRHQVXUHWKDWDYHUEDWLPUHFRUGRIWKHbSURFHHGLQJVLV PDGH ZKLFK UHFRUG LQFOXGHV WKH WHVWLPRQ\ DQG HYLGHQFH XSRQ ZKLFK WKH DSSHDOLVbWREHEDVHG 1RYHPEHU ’$7(7KXUVGD\1RYHPEHU 7,0(30 $’’5(66(&RXQW\/DQH/HKLJK)ORULGD ,QDFFRUGDQFHZLWKWKH/HKLJK$FUHV3ODQQLQJ&RPPXQLW\UHTXLUHPHQWVRI WKH/HHb&RXQW\/DQG’HYHORSPHQW&RGHWKH$SSOLFDQW$UFODQG3URSHUW\ &RPSDQ\//&ZLOObEHSUHVHQWLQJLQIRUPDWLRQWRWKHSXEOLFRQWKHIROORZLQJ UHTXHVWDWWKHPHHWLQJRIWKHb/HKLJK$FUHV$UFKLWHFWXUDO3ODQQLQJ=RQLQJ 5HYLHZ%RDUG 7R DPHQG WKH H[LVWLQJ 7RZQ /DNHV &RPPHUFLDO 3ODQQHG ’HYHORSPHQW &3’bWRDOORZIRUWKHGHYHORSPHQWRIDVTXDUHIRRWPLQLZDUHKRXVH ZLWKbRSHQVWRUDJHDUHDIRU59ERDWVWRUDJHWKDWLVLQDGGLWLRQWRWKHH[LVWLQJ PLQLb ZDUHKRXVH LQ WKH 7RZQ /DNHV &3’53’ 7KH 3URSHUW\ LV ORFDWHG ZLWKLQ/HKLJKb$FUHV3ODQQLQJ&RPPXQLW\RQWKHVRXWKVLGHRI)RXQWDLQ0LVW %OYGDQGZHVWbRI:LOOLDPV$YHLQXQLQFRUSRUDWHG/HH&RXQW\)ORULGD 7KH SXUSRVH RI WKH PHHWLQJ LV WR HGXFDWH FRPPXQLW\ PHPEHUV DQG QHDUE\b ODQGRZQHUV DERXW WKH SURSRVHG GHYHORSPHQW DQG WR DGGUHVV DQ\ TXHVWLRQV )RUTXHVWLRQVSOHDVHFRQWDFW 59,3ODQQLQJFR)UHG’URYGOLF$,&3 %URDGZD\6XLWH)RUW0\HUV)/ 25IGURYGOLF#UYLSODQQLQJFRP 1Rbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb1RYHPEHU Public Notices ’$7(b0RQGD\1RYHPEHU 7,0(b30 $’’5(66b 2UDQJH %ORVVRP ’U1DSOHV)/LQWKH6XJGHQ 7KHDWHU ,QDFFRUGDQFHZLWK&ROOLHU&RXQW\V /DQG’HYHORSPHQW&RGHWKH$SSOL FDQW <DUEHUU\ 3DUWQHUV //& ZLOO EH SUHVHQWLQJ LQIRUPDWLRQ WR WKH SXEOLFRQWKHIROORZLQJUHTXHVW $ UHTXHVW WR PRGLI\ WKH DSSURYHG 3DOLVDGHV538’0DVWHU3ODQ2UGL QDQFH 7KH UHTXHVW XSGDWHV WKH0DVWHU3ODQDGGVDQGPRGLILHV FURVVVHFWLRQV GHSLFWLQJ SURSHUW\ ERXQGDULHV DQG W\SLFDO ZDOO FURVV VHFWLRQV DQG XSGDWHV WKH DSSURYHG GHYLDWLRQV WR PDNH HDFK FRQVLVWHQW b 7KH%RDUGRI6XSHUYLVRUV%RDUG RIWKH&RUNVFUHZ&URVVLQJ&RPPX QLW\ ’HYHORSPHQW ’LVWULFW ’LVWULFW ZLOO KROG D 5HJXODU %RDUG 0HHWLQJ WKH 0HHWLQJ RQ 1RYHPEHU DW SP DW WKH5LYHU&UHHN6DOHV2IILFHORFDWHG DW6SULQJEURRN&RXUW(VWHUR )ORULGDZKHUHWKH%RDUGPD\ FRQVLGHU DQ\ EXVLQHVV WKDW PD\ SURSHUO\FRPHEHIRUHLW $ FRS\ RI WKH DJHQGD PD\ EH REWDLQHGDWWKHRIILFHVRIWKH’LVWULFW 0DQDJHU $ %XUQV 5RDG 3DOP %HDFK *DUGHQV )ORULGD ’LVWULFW 0DQDJHUV 2IILFH GXULQJ QRUPDO EXVLQHVV KRXUV 7KH 0HHWLQJ LV RSHQ WR WKH SXEOLF DQGZLOOEHFRQGXFWHGLQDFFRUGDQFH ZLWK WKH SURYLVLRQV RI )ORULGD ODZ 7KH0HHWLQJPD\EHFRQWLQXHGWRD GDWHWLPHDQGSODFHWREHVSHFLILHG RQWKHUHFRUGDWWKHPHHWLQJ7KHUH PD\ EH RFFDVLRQV ZKHQ %RDUG 6XSHUYLVRUV RU ’LVWULFW 6WDII PD\ SDUWLFLSDWHE\VSHDNHUWHOHSKRQH $Q\SHUVRQUHTXLULQJVSHFLDODFFRP PRGDWLRQV DW WKLV 0HHWLQJ EHFDXVH RI D GLVDELOLW\ RU SK\VLFDO LPSDLU PHQW VKRXOG FRQWDFW WKH ’LVWULFW 0DQDJHUV2IILFHDWOHDVWIRUW\HLJKW KRXUV SULRU WR WKH 0HHWLQJ ,I \RXDUHKHDULQJRUVSHHFKLPSDLUHG SOHDVH FRQWDFW WKH )ORULGD 5HOD\ 6HUYLFHE\GLDOLQJRU 77< 9RLFH IRU DLG LQ FRQWDFWLQJ WKH ’LVWULFW 0DQDJHUV2IILFH (DFKSHUVRQZKRGHFLGHVWRDSSHDO DQ\ GHFLVLRQ PDGH E\ WKH %RDUG ZLWK UHVSHFW WR DQ\ PDWWHU FRQVLG HUHGDWWKH0HHWLQJLVDGYLVHGWKDW SHUVRQ ZLOO QHHG D UHFRUG RI SURFHHGLQJV DQG WKDW DFFRUGLQJO\ WKHSHUVRQPD\QHHGWRHQVXUHWKDW D YHUEDWLP UHFRUG RI WKH SURFHHG LQJV LV PDGH LQFOXGLQJ WKH WHVWL PRQ\DQGHYLGHQFHXSRQZKLFKVXFK DSSHDOLVWREHEDVHG b .DWKOHHQ’DLOH\0HQHHO\ ’LVWULFW0DQDJHU b &25.6&5(:&5266,1*&2008 1,7<’(9(/230(17’,675,&7 ZZZFRUNVFUHZFURVVLQJFGGRUJ 1RY DQ\ %RDUG 6XSHUYLVRU RU VWDII PHPEHUFDQDWWHQGWKHPHHWLQJE\ WHOHSKRQH DQG EH IXOO\ LQIRUPHG RI WKH GLVFXVVLRQV WDNLQJ SODFH HLWKHU LQSHUVRQRUE\WHOHSKRQHFRPPXQL FDWLRQ7KHPHHWLQJPD\EHFRQWLQ XHG LQ SURJUHVV ZLWKRXW DGGLWLRQDO QRWLFHWRDWLPHGDWHDQGORFDWLRQ VWDWHGRQWKHUHFRUG 3XUVXDQWWRSURYLVLRQVRIWKH$PHUL FDQV ZLWK ’LVDELOLWLHV $FW DQ\ SHUVRQ UHTXLULQJ VSHFLDO DFFRPPR GDWLRQV WR SDUWLFLSDWH LQ WKLV PHHW LQJ LV DVNHG WR DGYLVH WKH ’LVWULFW 2IILFH DW DW OHDVW KRXUV EHIRUH WKH PHHWLQJV ,I \RX DUH KHDULQJ RU VSHHFK LPSDLUHG SOHDVH FRQWDFW WKH )ORULGD 5HOD\ 6HUYLFHE\GLDOLQJRU 77< 9RLFH IRU DLG LQ FRQWDFWLQJ WKH ’LVWULFW 2IILFH $SHUVRQZKRGHFLGHVWRDSSHDODQ\ GHFLVLRQ PDGH E\ WKH %RDUG ZLWK UHVSHFWWRDQ\PDWWHUFRQVLGHUHGDW WKH PHHWLQJ LV DGYLVHG WKDW WKH SHUVRQ ZLOO QHHG D UHFRUG RI WKH SURFHHGLQJV DQG WKDW DFFRUGLQJO\ WKHSHUVRQPD\QHHGWRHQVXUHWKDW D YHUEDWLP UHFRUG RI WKH SURFHHG LQJV LV PDGH LQFOXGLQJ WKH WHVWL PRQ\DQGHYLGHQFHXSRQZKLFKWKH DSSHDOLVEDVHG %HOLQGD%ODQGRQ ’LVWULFW0DQDJHU 5XQ’DWH b Public Notices Public Notices *R 6WRUH ,W %UXQHU /DQH )W 0\HUV )O KHUHE\ JLYHV 127,&( 2) 38%/,& 6$/( RI WKH VWRUDJH VSDFHV OLVWHG EHORZ -RVH &DPSRV&FRQWDLQLQJKRXVHKROG DQGRWKHUJRRGVZLOOEHVROGIRUFDVK RQ DW SP :LWK WKH FRQWHQWV EHLQJ VROG WR WKH KLJKHVW ELGGHU2ZQHUUHVHUYHVWKHULJKWWR ELG7KHVDOHLVEHLQJKHOGWRVDWLVI\ DODQGORUGVOLHQLQDFFRUGDQFHZLWK )ORULGD 6WDWXWHV 6HFWLRQ DQG ZLOO EH KHOG RQOLQH DW ZZZVWRUDJHWUHDVXUHVFRP b *R 6WRUH ,W %UXQHU /DQH )W 0\HUV )O KHUHE\ JLYHV 127,&( 2) 38%/,& 6$/( RI WKH VWRUDJH VSDFHV OLVWHG EHORZ -RVH &DPSRV&FRQWDLQLQJKRXVHKROG DQGRWKHUJRRGVZLOOEHVROGIRUFDVK RQ DW SP :LWK WKH FRQWHQWV EHLQJ VROG WR WKH KLJKHVW ELGGHU2ZQHUUHVHUYHVWKHULJKWWR ELG7KHVDOHLVEHLQJKHOGWRVDWLVI\ DODQGORUGVOLHQLQDFFRUGDQFHZLWK )ORULGD 6WDWXWHV 6HFWLRQ DQG ZLOO EH KHOG RQOLQH DW ZZZVWRUDJHWUHDVXUHVFRP b Public Sale 7KH /HH &RXQW\ %RDUG RI &RXQW\ &RPPLVVLRQHUV ZLOO KROG D SXEOLF KHDULQJ WR FRQVLGHU WKH DGRSWLRQ RI SURSRVHG DPHQGPHQWV WR WKH /HH &RXQW\ &RPSUHKHQVLYH /DQG 8VH 3ODQ /HH 3ODQ 7KLV KHDULQJ ZDV LQLWLDOO\ SXEOLVKHG WR RFFXU RQ 1RYHPEHU7KHQHZKHDULQJ GDWH ZLOO EH KHOG RQ :HGQHVGD\ ’HFHPEHU7KHKHDULQJZLOO FRPPHQFHDWDPRUDVVRRQ WKHUHDIWHU DV FDQ EH KHDUG LQ WKH %RDUG &KDPEHUV 0DLQ 6WUHHW LQ’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’$TXDOLILHGUHDVRQDEOHPRGLIL FDWLRQDWQRFKDUJHWRWKHUHTXHVWRU FRQWDFW -RDQ /D*XDUGLD )ORULGD 5HOD\ 6HUYLFH DW OHDVWILYHEXVLQHVVGD\VLQDGYDQFH (O &RQGDGR GH /HH EULQGDU£ VHUYL FLRV GH WUDGXFFLQ VLQ FDUJR D SHUVRQDVFRQHOLGLRPDOLPLWDGRGHO LQJO«V 1RY VHFWLRQV DQG XSGDWHV WKH DSSURYHG GHYLDWLRQV WR PDNH HDFK FRQVLVWHQW ZLWKEXLOWFRQGLWLRQV 7KH SXUSRVH RI WKH PHHWLQJ LV WR HGXFDWH FRPPXQLW\ PHPEHUV DQG QHDUE\ ODQGRZQHUV DERXW WKH SURSRVHG GHYHORSPHQW DQG WR DGGUHVVDQ\TXHVWLRQV )RUTXHVWLRQVSOHDVHFRQWDFW 59,3ODQQLQJFR-HP)UDQW] %RQLWD*UDQGH’ULYH6XLWH %RQLWD6SULQJV)/ 25 MIUDQW]#59,3ODQQLQJFRP 1RY Public Notices 3.D.c Packet Pg. 242 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) 3.D.c Packet Pg. 243 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) RVi Planning + Landscape Architecture • 28100 Bonita Grande Drive, Sutie 305 • Bonita Springs, FL 34135 • 239.405.7777 • www.rviplanning.com November 1, 2023 RE: Palisades RPUD (PDI) PL20230011202 Dear Property Owner: Please be advised that Yarberry Partners, LLC (“Applicant”) has filed a request to modify the approved Palisades RPUD Master Plan (Ordinance 2022-20). The request updates the Master Plan, adds and modifies cross-sections depicting property boundaries and typical wall cross sections, and updates the approved deviations to make each consistent with built conditions. The Palisades RPUD Property totals 12 +/- acres and is generally located on the west side of Yarberry Lane and approximately 0.2 miles south of Orange Blossom Drive in unincorporated Collier County, Florida (see attached project location map). In compliance with the Land Development Code requirements, a Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held to provide you an opportunity to hear a presentation about this application and ask questions. The Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held Thursday Monday 16, 2023, at 5:05 pm in the Sugden Theater located at 2385 Orange Blossom Dr., Naples, FL 34109. Should you require additional information or have any questions, please feel free to contact me directly at (239) 357-9580 or jfrantz@rviplanning.com. Sincerely, RVi Planning + Landscape Architecture Jem Frantz, AICP Project Director 3.D.c Packet Pg. 244 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) State of Florida, Maxar, Microsoft Copyright RVI Collier County 4/26/2023 2300XXXX Yarberry Parrtners, LLC 111 N Magnolia Avenue Suite 1350 Orlando, FL 32801 Tel: 407.680.0650 www.rviplanning.com PALISADES PDI • AERIAL MAP Information furnished regarding this property is from sources deemed reliable. RVi has not made an independent investigation of these sources and no warranty is made as to their accuracy or completeness. This plan is conceptual, subject to change, and does not represent any regulatory approval.YARBERRY LNORANGE BLOSSOM DR Legend Subject Boundary Parcels 0 300150 Feet 3.D.c Packet Pg. 245 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) 1 NAME ADDRESS 1 ADDRESS 2 COUNTRY CITY STATE USZIP 2223 TRADE CENTER WAY LLC 2223 TRADE CENTER WAY USA NAPLES FL 34109 CAPTIVA COMMERCE PTNRS LLC 3120 WINKLER AVE EXT # 30 USA FT MYERS FL 33916 360 PROPERTIES LLC 12920 METRO PARKWAY USA FORT MYERS FL 33966 KINIK HOLDING LLC 2151 TRADE CENTER WAY USA NAPLES FL 34109 BROADWAY TRADERS LLC 5450 TAMIAMI TRL N USA NAPLES FL 34108 JAMES CAROLLO DECLARAT TRUST 64 DUNDEE LN USA BARRINGTON IL 60010 CROTHERS HOLDING LLC 2043 TRADE CENTER WAY USA NAPLES FL 34109 LIPPERT PROPERTIES LLC 2051 TRADE CENTER WAY USA NAPLES FL 34109 NIAN FINANCING CORP 2055 TRADE CENTER WAY USA NAPLES FL 34109 ANNEKAY PROPERTIES LLC 9846 SANDRINGHAM GATE USA NAPLES FL 34109 STAHLMAN HOLDINGS LLC 2065 TRADE CENTER WAY USA NAPLES FL 34109 STEPHENS INDUSTRIES LLC 2047 TRADE CENTER WAY USA NAPLES FL 34109 TCWI LLC 26300 MORTON AVE USA BONITA SPRINGS FL 34135 LISA B HOMES LLC 2009 TRADE CENTER WAY USA NAPLES FL 34109 NOVAK SEVEN LLC 5201 TAMIAMI TRL N #1 USA NAPLES FL 34103 ELBRECHT INVESTMENTS LLC 7067 COUNTY ROAD 8780 USA WEST PLAINS MI 65775 BARTOLEC, BRIAN 6825 IL REGALO CIR USA NAPLES FL 34109 MICHAEL J SANTI LIVING TRUST 6821 IL REGALO CIRCLE USA NAPLES FL 34109 LANGELOH, JAMES=& TINA 6817 IL REGALO CIRCLE USA NAPLES FL 34109 MAKI, CRAIG A=& DEBRA D 6813 IL REGALO CIR USA NAPLES FL 34109 ZOTTOLA, ROBERT F 6982 MILL RUN CIR USA NAPLES FL 34109 WILLIAMS, GWENDOLYN 7008 MILL RUN CIR USA NAPLES FL 34109 GILLIS, RICHARD J=& ELENI T 7052 MILL RUN CIRCLE USA NAPLES FL 34109 GATCHELL, DAVID D=& JULIE N 1011 W 103 STREET USA KANSAS CITY MO 64114 JACK VICTOR JOHNSON TRUST 16460 W KINGSTON CT USA PRAIRIE VIEW IL 60069 SPARS, DARLENE J 7088 MILL RUN CIRCLE USA NAPLES FL 34109 CLEELAND, BYRON T=& KATHLEEN T 7102 MILL RUN CIR USA NAPLES FL 34109 LATERRA, JOSEPH=& KRISTINE 7114 MILL RUN CIR USA NAPLES FL 34109 RACKE, JOSEPH C 7126 MILL RUN CIR USA NAPLES FL 34109 JEFFREY CHEW SMITH REV TRUST 7138 MILL RUN CIRCLE USA NAPLES FL 34109 PHYLLIS ANN FINNEGAN TRUST 7150 MILL RUN CIR USA NAPLES FL 34109 W SCOTT ECKELS REV TRUST 7158 MILL RUN CIR USA NAPLES FL 34109 THOMAS TR, JERRY W 1920 MANCHESTER CIR USA NAPLES FL 34109 TANGHE, BRYAN M=& KAROLINA 2003 DEERFIELD CIRCLE USA NAPLES FL 34109 CARROLL, RAYMOND E 2005 DEERFIELD CIR USA NAPLES FL 34109 VAN DER HEYDEN, TERRY R 2007 DEERFIELD CIR USA NAPLES FL 34109 CARROLL, ROBERT E=& NICOLE M 2009 DEERFIELD CIRCLE USA NAPLES FL 34109 POPPENWIMER, LINDA S 2008 DEERFIELD CIR USA NAPLES FL 34109 MILLER, JAMES A 2006 DEERFIELD CIR USA NAPLES FL 34109 KORN, JASON H=& SANDRA S 7165 MILL RUN CIR USA NAPLES FL 34109 JOHNSON, A MICHAEL=& CELINE S 7157 MILL RUN CIR USA NAPLES FL 34109 REILLY, SUSAN C 7149 MILL RUN CIR USA NAPLES FL 34109 KOVACS, RICHARD=& JULIA 7141 MILL RUN CIR USA NAPLES FL 34109 KAHLE, KAREN A 7133 MILL RUN CIR USA NAPLES FL 34109 GESDORF, ROBERT S=& SHERI L 7121 MILL RUN CIR USA NAPLES FL 34109 SPROWLS, BRADLEY=& GABRIELLA 7109 MILL RUN CIR USA NAPLES FL 34109 Final Mailing List 3.D.c Packet Pg. 246 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) 2 DOUGHERTY, CHARLES=& PATRICIA 188 S BENJAMIN DR USA W EST CHESTER PA 19382 LOERZEL, PETER J 7085 MILL RUN CIR USA NAPLES FL 34109 KINNEAR, ROBIN ANTHONY 7073 MILL RUN CIR USA NAPLES FL 34109 MAZZEI, DON J=& MARILYN S 9706 SOUTH PARK CIRCLE USA FAIRFAX VA 22039 BROOKE, JASON K 7049 MILL RUN CIR USA NAPLES FL 34109 B LINDNER WILLEY REV TRUST 7037 MILL RUN CIR USA NAPLES FL 34109 HOLIDAY EVERYTHING INC 6597 NICHOLAS BLVD #1103 USA NAPLES FL 34108 MACK, PATRICE C 7013 MILL RUN CIR USA NAPLES FL 34109 LINDHEIM, KEVIN J=& DENISE R 7001 MILL RUN CIR USA NAPLES FL 34109 SATINSKY, ADAM=& KHWANJAI 6989 MILL RUN CIR USA NAPLES FL 34109 ARLENE E DELUCA REV TRUST 6977 MILL RUN CIR USA NAPLES FL 34109 THOMSEN, DARREN WAYNE 6965 MILL RUN CIR USA NAPLES FL 34109 COMM ASSOC FOR STONEGATE AND 1044 CASTELLO DR USA NAPLES FL 34103 COMMUNITY ASSOC FOR MILL RUN 6736 LONE OAK BLVD USA NAPLES FL 34109 PACIFICA ARBOUR WALK LLC 1775 HANCOCK STREET STE 200 USA SAN DIEGO CA 92110 JVJ15 LLC 4688 KENSINGTON CIR USA NAPLES FL 34119 KRAUS, DEBRA 662 ROBIN DR USA EASTLAKE OH 44095 ALCHAAR TR, MOWAFFAK 574 N OAKLAWN AVE USA ELMHURST IL 60126 YANTZI, JERRY R F=& BEVERLY W 26300 E 108TH STREET USA OLAHTE KS 66061 SOTO, GUSTAVO RAMIRO CASILLA POSTAL 1068 CHILE ANTOFAGASTA FLACO'S INVESTMENTS LLC 4750 5TH AVENUE SW USA NAPLES FL 34119 GUIDO INVESTMENTS LLC 4750 5TH AVE SW USA NAPLES FL 34119 NJM PROPERTIES LLC 12304 SW 109TH CT USA MIAMI FL 33176 DP1 PROPERTIES LLC 308 SPIDER LILY LANE USA NAPLES FL 34119 NAPLES SKY REALTY LLC PO BOX 110101 USA NAPLES FL 34108 VILLARROEL, MARIA JULIA 2190 ARBOUR WALK CIR USA NAPLES FL 34109 AHMAD, NAJEH S 7720 CITRUS HILL LN USA NAPLES FL 34109 PF HOLDINGS FLORIDA LLC 308 SPIDER LILY LANE USA NAPLES FL 34119 CALIJONE, KEN=& MARIA 325 DUNES BLVD APT 503 USA NAPLES FL 34110 FLYNN, LAWRENCE J=& PAMELA H 7 DEWEY AVE USA WILMINGTON MA 01887 FINNEGAN, RICHARD C 2142 ARBOUR WALK CIR #2628 USA NAPLES FL 34109 BALANCA, ADRIAN 2130 ARBOUR WALK CIR #2711 USA NAPLES FL 34109 CONTRERAS STONE CORP 4160 6TH AVE SE USA NAPLES FL 34117 JENSEN FAMILY TRUST 3330 CAMINITO VASTO USA LA JOLLA CA 92037 SUN APPLE PROPERTIES LLC 210 SUMMIT AVE STE A11 USA MONTVALE NJ 07645 2118 ARBOUR WALK CIRCLE LLC 74 BEACHSIDE AVE USA EAST HAVEN CT 06512 DECAMPS, CELIA 2106 ARBOUR WALK CIRCLE UNIT 2922 USA NAPLES FL 34109 PIZZUTI PROPERTIES LLC 308 SPIDER LILY LANE USA NAPLES FL 34119 PF POINCIANA LLC 308 SPIDER LILY LANE USA NAPLES FL 34119 ALLEGRET, CATHERINE 2310 PINEWOODS CIR USA NAPLES FL 34105 CALIJONE, STEPHEN 18 TAM O SHANTER DRIVE USA MAHWAH NJ 07430 JIMENEZ, NESTOR EDUARDO 2226 ARBOUR WALK CIR UNIT 1928 USA NAPLES FL 34109 PRECI, ARDIAN 26 SORRENTO STREET USA WORCESTER MA 01602 JOHNSON, NANCY 2214 ARBOUR WALK CIR #2014 USA NAPLES FL 34109 SCHLAFF, DAVID 22 MASTERS RIDGE USA SOUTHERN PINES NC 28387 GORA, NICOLE 2178 ARBOUR WALK CIR #2314 USA NAPLES FL 34109 GARBER, GLORIA 2178 ARBOUR WALK CIR #2318 USA NAPLES FL 34109 Final Mailing List 3.D.c Packet Pg. 247 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) 3 IGGENA, SUSAN R 66 EMERALD WOODS DR #H4 USA NAPLES FL 34108 FREDERICO, MARK 46 LEEDALE DR USA WEBSTER NY 14580 REIDY, SARA 2010 KESSLER PKWY USA DALLAS TX 75208 ALMON, WILLIAM=& KATHLEEN 5560 BERKSHIRE DR #201 USA FORT MYERS FL 33912 PF COLLIER LLC 308 SPIDER LILY LN USA NAPLES FL 34119 PAGAN-ORTIZ, JOSE E 1846 N MELBORN USA DEARBORN MI 48128 GAGNON, REMI 2284 HINGSTON AVE CANADA MONTREAL QC H4A 2 PETRESCU, ANTONELA=& SILVIU 111 OAK PARK DRIVE CANADA WATERLOO ON N2K 0 HOWARD FAMILY REVOC LIV TRUST 42027 POCAHONTAS RD USA BAKER CITY OR 97814 CASALS, ROBERT 853 99TH AVE N USA NAPLES FL 34108 BAILEY, DANIEL B 2106 ARBOUR WALK CIRCLE #2928 USA NAPLES FL 34109 VILLAVICENCIO, JOSE E 3911 SW 138TH CT USA MIAMI FL 33175 LYNK PROPERTIES LLC 6905 WESSELMAN RD USA CLEVES OH 45002 KINGDOM PRPTY OF NAPLES LLC PO BOX 613 USA NAPLES FL 34106 RADONCIC, ZLATAN 7 W 87TH ST # 2E USA NEW YORK NY 10024 STEFAN, GABRIEL 2082 ARBOUR WALK CIR APT 3124 USA NAPLES FL 34109 SCOTT, DEBORAH P 2226 ARBOUR WALK CIR #1914 USA NAPLES FL 34109 PHILLIPS, SUZANNE E 2214 ARBOUR WALK CIR #2024 USA NAPLES FL 34109 GRUBB, JENNY B 741 99TH AVE N USA NAPLES FL 34108 GEORGE T ROUSE TRUST 75 BACTON HILL RD USA MALVERN PA 19355 ADAMS, SUZANNE 2202 ARBOUR WALK CIR APT 2116 USA NAPLES FL 34109 FREUND, JAREK MARIAN 1204 RIDGE ST USA NAPLES FL 34103 WAYNE HARTMANN REV TRUST 99 SCOTT STREET USA MASSAPEQUA PARK NY 11762 BIELEFELD, FREDERICK 45 COUNTRYSIDE LN USA GRAND ISLAND NY 14072 BARRANTES, WARNER 3380 ATLANTIC CIRCLE USA NAPLES FL 34119 DIPIETRO, MARY A 45 TRELLI LN USA BRISTOL CT 06010 SAYWARD, DAVID W 5 NASHUA ROAD USA WINDHAM NH 03087 JOHNSON, WILLIAM=& DIANE 4281 LIGHTHOUSE LN USA WEST CHESTER OH 45069 NAPLES BLUE PROPERTIES LLC PO BOX 110101 USA NAPLES FL 34108 MORRIS, GISELA I 2166 ARBOUR WALK CIR APT 2413 USA NAPLES FL 34109 GAMBOA, MARIA ELENA 2154 ARBOUR WALK CIR # 2514 USA NAPLES FL 34109 MAIONE, SABINO 936 BARON DR CANADA FORT ERIE ON L2A 6 CERVERA, MARIA J 2142 ARBOUR WALK CIR #2617 USA NAPLES FL 34109 GREEN GOLF REALTY PO BOX 110101 USA NAPLES FL 34108 ALEX PALLET INC 21 CRONIN AVENUE CANADA TORONTO ON M9B 4 HAKAIM, TOM S 1405 E 28TH ST USA LORAIN OH 44055 CASALS JR, ROBERT 5617 BUCHANAN DR USA FORT PIERCE FL 34982 BERMUDEZ, AIMEE 3450 CARTWRIGHT CT USA BONITA SPRINGS FL 34134 IGGENA, SUSAN 66 EMERALD WOODS DR H4 USA NAPLES FL 34108 ROMEO, CHARLES PO BOX 101113 USA CAPE CORAL FL 33910 MARGARITIS, ARTHUR 40 HEDGE LANE USA WESTBURY NY 11590 TULLY, MARILYN 1680 MULLET CT USA NAPLES FL 34102 FLACOS INVESTMENTS LLC 4750 5TH AVE SW USA NAPLES FL 34119 ROSTRON, FRANCIS 2743 OLDE CYPRESS DR USA NAPLES FL 34119 DWYER, ARTHUR E=& DEBORAH A 2 DEBRA AVE USA BRISTOL RI 02809 ARGUETA, BERNARDIO 3539 SANTIAGO WAY USA NAPLES FL 34105 FENG, KE 16109 PARQUE LANE USA NAPLES FL 34110 Final Mailing List 3.D.c Packet Pg. 248 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) 4 3266 ARBOUR WALK CIRCLE TRUST 720 GOODLETTE RD N #304 USA NAPLES FL 34102 MARQUEZ, GRACIELA LILIANA 4460 3RD AVE NW USA NAPLES FL 34119 DOMINGUEZ, VANINA PAOLA 2154 ARBOUR WALK CIR APT 2524 USA NAPLES FL 34109 FURST BEAN FAMILY TRUST 6608 BARRETT ROAD USA FALLS CHURCH VA 22042 KUTASH, MALCOLM=& DORIS 2731 ARDISIA LN USA NAPLES FL 34109 GARITAPE LLC PARAJE AMBAY NO 15 FERNANDO PARAGUAY DE LA MORA 2300 RHONA E SAUNDERS TRUST 6955 CARLISLE CT #313 USA NAPLES FL 34109 KAGEN, MARK H 2118 ARBOUR WALK CIR APT 2813 USA NAPLES FL 34109 REBLE, LINDA 1585 25TH ST SW USA NAPLES FL 34117 KRISTOPHERS FUTURE LLC 106 FERRY STREET USA NEWARK NJ 07105 BLINN, JANICE RUTH 2200 GLENWOOD SCHOOL DR #23 CANADA BURLINGTON ON L7R 4 FLORINE P BERNARD REV TRUST 1219 HAMPTON RDG USA BEDFORD VA 24523 CAUGHENBAUGH, RYAN D 2058 ARBOUR WALK CIR APT 3313 USA NAPLES FL 34109 RAUSCHER-GRAY, EILEEN 4239 PECHIN ST USA PHILADELPHIA PA 19128 FAHEY, KEVIN M=& CHRISITNE M 5125 YELLOW WOOD PKWY USA JAMESVILLE NY 13078 KINGDON PROPRTES OF NAPLES LLC PO BOX 613 USA NAPLES FL 34106 HUDSON, ANN MARIE 66 EMERALD WOODS DR #4 USA NAPLES FL 34108 ANTHONY, WILLIE 559 14TH ST N USA NAPLES FL 34102 ADKINS, VALERIE 6815 YARBERRY LN USA NAPLES FL 34109 LB ORANGE BLOSSOM LLC 2210 VANDERBILT BEACH RD #1300 USA NAPLES FL 34109 6626 YARBARRY LAND TRUST 2670 AIRPORT ROAD SOUTH USA NAPLES FL 34112 NAPLES GULFSHORE CONGREGATION 6755 YARBERRY LN USA NAPLES FL 34109 6630 YARBERRY LAND TRUST 2670 AIRPORT ROAD S USA NAPLES FL 34112 6614 YARBERRY LAND TRUST 2670 AIRPORT PULLING ROAD S USA NAPLES FL 34112 ANTHONY, CORETTA S 9604 LAKE HUGH DR USA GOTHA FL 34734 LYNN TR, LOIS 1730 W BELFAST ST USA MESA AZ 85201 ANTHONY, ORSIE 2373 ANTHONY CT USA NAPLES FL 34109 COTTON, SYLVESTER 2337 ANTHONY CT USA NAPLES FL 34109 COLLIER CNTY 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 USA NAPLES FL 34112 FIELDS, ANTHONY J 1279 5TH AVE N USA NAPLES FL 34102 YARBERRY, MARY LOUISE 6634 YARBERRY LN USA NAPLES FL 34109 ADKINS, ELLA LOUISE 6809 YARBERRY LN USA NAPLES FL 34109 DIXON ET AL, PEARLIN 6785 YARBERRY LN USA NAPLES FL 34109 THOMAS, LAVERNE ASALEE 6725 YARBERRY LN USA NAPLES FL 34109 Final Mailing List 3.D.c Packet Pg. 249 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) Exhibit C – Presentation 3.D.c Packet Pg. 250 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) PALISADES RPUD - PDI NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING November 16th, 2023 3.D.c Packet Pg. 251 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) Keith Norton Seagate Development Group Jackie Larocque & Ayberk Vergul Atwell Jem Frantz RVi Planning + Landscape Architecture Welcome & Introductions NOVEMBER 16, 2023 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING 2 3.D.c Packet Pg. 252 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) 01 02 03 04 05 NOVEMBER 16, 2023 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING 3 Project Background Meeting Agenda May 2023 Commitments Request Overview Next Steps Questions 3.D.c Packet Pg. 253 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) NOVEMBER 16, 2023 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING 4 Palisades RPUD 3.D.c Packet Pg. 254 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) •Oaks planted inside perimeter wall (spaced in-between existing outside trees) to create additional canopy cover to disrupt views from both sides. •Internal Clusia and outside scrub to be maintained 18” -24” above existing wall height. •Black chain link fence Installed with access gate from the SW wall corner to meet Mill Run’s existing fence to stop access from the apartment buildings. •All drawings related to the wall height will be updated to reflect existing conditions. May 2023 Commitments HENDRY COUNTY PLANNING WORKSHOP 5APRIL 27, 2023 3.D.c Packet Pg. 255 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) NOVEMBER 16, 2023 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING 6 Approved Master Plan 3.D.c Packet Pg. 256 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) NOVEMBER 16, 2023 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING 7 Approved Cross Section Add breakout map 3.D.c Packet Pg. 257 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) •Master Plan Changes: •Update cross section labels and wall height •Cross Section Changes: •Elevation of adjacent grade corrected •Berm & Wall height reflect as-built conditions •Deviation Change: •Maximum berm & wall height reflect as-built conditions Request Overview NOVEMBER 16, 2023 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING 8 3.D.c Packet Pg. 258 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) NOVEMBER 16, 2023 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING 9 •No changes to approved density or uses. •No changes to Residential Tracts •No changes to stormwater management system Updated Master Plan 3.D.c Packet Pg. 259 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) NOVEMBER 16, 2023 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING 10 Updated Cross Sections Reflect Built Conditions 3.D.c Packet Pg. 260 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) DEVIATION 1 FROM LDC SECTION 5.03.02.C.2, "FENCES AND WALLS", WHICH PERMITS A MAXIMUM FENCE/WALL HEIGHT OF 6 FEET IN RESIDENTIAL COMPONENTS OF PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICTS, TO ALLOW FOR A MAXIMUM FENCE/WALL/BERM HEIGHT OF 8 12.50 FEET ALONG THE PUD PERIMETER BOUNDARY. Approved Deviation #1 11NOVEMBER 16, 2023 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING 3.D.c Packet Pg. 261 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) NOVEMBER 16, 2023 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING 12 Next Steps PUD Insubstantial Change Application Application submittal and County Staff review complete Neighborhood Information Meeting Hearing Examiner Meeting December 14th @ 9:00 am 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr. Conference Room 609/610 Email the Team jfrantz@rviplanning.com 3.D.c Packet Pg. 262 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) Questions? THANK YOU 3.D.c Packet Pg. 263 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) Exhibit D – Meeting Handout 3.D.c Packet Pg. 264 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) PROJECT BOUNDARY (TYP.) 15' TYPE "B" BUFFER 10' TYPE "A" BUFFER 15' TYPE "B" BUFFER 2 15' TYPE "D" BUFFER 3 OPTIONAL 6-8' TALL WALL/FENCE OPTIONAL 6-8' TALL WALL/FENCE OPTIONAL 6-8' TALL WALL/FENCE ARBOUR WALK CIRCLE YARBERRY LANE(2 LANE LOCAL ROAD)RESIDENTIAL TRACT RESIDENTIAL TRACT LAKE MILL RUN CIRCLE RESIDENTIAL TRACT USE: MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING: PUD (KEYSTONE PLACE) FLU: URBAN RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION USE: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING: RSF-1 FLU: URBAN RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT USE: CHRUCH ZONING: RSF-1 FLU: URBAN RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT USE: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING: PUD (SLEEPY HOLLOW) FLU: URBAN RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT 4 3 1 1 1 REQUIRED 6'-8' TALL WALLWA L L S E C T I O N AWA L L S E C T I O N B WALL SECTION A WALL SECTION B WALL SECTION AWALL SECTION B PALISADES AVENUENEWPORT ROADWA L L S E C T IO N BWALL SECTION AEXHIBIT C1 of 4 0 SCALE IN FEET 30 60 120WALDROPENGINEERINGCIVIL ENGINEERING &LAND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTSSET NUMBER: SHEET :28100 BONITA GRANDE DRIVE - SUITE 305 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135P: 239-405-7777 F: 239-405-7899 EMAIL: info@waldropengineering.comB:\Projects\1272-200 (Palisades) Plans & Permitting\Drawings-Exhibits\1272-200-02 MCP\Current Plans\12722000207.dwg9/25/2023 9:25:01 AM10/27/2021REVISED PER CLIENT AND COUNTY COMMENTSPUD MASTER PLANPALISADES RPUDFLORIDA CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION #8636PLAN REVISIONSREV00 <<SUBMITTED / BID SET>> XX/XX/XX1272-200-021LEGEND LAKE VEHICULAR INGRESS AND EGRESS #DEVIATION 212/20/2021REVISED PER CLIENT AND COUNTY COMMENTS306/19/2023REVISED PER CLIENT AND COUNTY COMMENTS408/03/2023REVISED PER CLIENT AND COUNTY COMMENTS509/25/2023REVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS3.D.c Packet Pg. 265 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) 50.0' RIGHT OF WAY 2.0'10.0' TRAVEL LANE 10.0' TRAVEL LANE 2.0'4.0'5.0' SIDEWALK 4.0' VALLEY GUTTER (TYP) 4.0'5.0' SIDEWALK 4.0' TYPICAL 50' ROW CROSS SECTION N.T.S. 2% MAX 2% MAX2%2% 10.0' PUE 10.0' PUE 3 50.0' RIGHT OF WAY 2.0'10.0' TRAVEL LANE 10.0' TRAVEL LANE 2.0'4.0'6.0' SIDEWALK 3.0' VALLEY GUTTER (TYP) SIDEWALK DEVIATION CROSS SECTION N.T.S. 2% MAX2%2% 10.0' PUE 10.0' PUE 4 13.0'EXHIBIT C2 of 4 NOT TO SCALEWALDROPENGINEERING CIVIL ENGINEERING &LAND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTSSET NUMBER: SHEET :28100 BONITA GRANDE DRIVE - SUITE 305 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135P: 239-405-7777 F: 239-405-7899 EMAIL: info@waldropengineering.comB:\Projects\1272-200 (Palisades) Plans & Permitting\Drawings-Exhibits\1272-200-02 MCP\Current Plans\12722000207.dwg9/25/2023 9:25:02 AMPUD MASTER PLANPALISADES RPUDFLORIDA CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION #8636PLAN REVISIONSREV00 <<SUBMITTED / BID SET>> XX/XX/XX1272-200-0210/27/2021REVISED PER CLIENT AND COUNTY COMMENTS1212/20/2021REVISED PER CLIENT AND COUNTY COMMENTS3.D.c Packet Pg. 266 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) TYPICAL WALL CROSS SECTION B-B N.T.S. CONTROL ELEVATION = 9.90 (FT-NAVD) ELEV. VARIES = 14.10-14.80 NAVD ACCESSORY STRUCTURE = 15.85 - 17.55 NAVD PERIMETER BERM ELEV. = 15.30 MIN. NAVD PERIMETER BERM ELEV. = 15.85 MAX. NAVD (25 YR. MIN. BERM ELEV. = 14.10 NAVD) PROPOSED 12" HDPE DRAINAGE * OPTIONAL 6.7' WALL 3:1 MA X LOT LINE BUFFER VARIES 7.0'5.0' MATCH LOWEST EXISTING ELEV. = 8.88 - 9.79 NAVD 15.0' DRAINAGE EASEMENT SILT FENCE STEM WALL IF NEEDED ELEV. = 14.10 MIN. NAVD ELEV.= 14.60 MAX. NAVD VARIES 4:1 MAX 4:1 MAX5.1' MIN.6.7' MAX.* THE FENCE / WALL IS NOT OPTIONAL ALONG THE WEST PROPERTY LINE. 1 1.5' PROPERTY BOUNDARY TYPICAL WALL CROSS SECTION A-A N.T.S. 1 * THE FENCE / WALL IS NOT OPTIONAL ALONG THE WEST PROPERTY LINE. FFE ELEV. = 17.90 NAVD ELEV. = 14.5 - 15.6 NAVD * OPTIONAL 6.6' WALL CONTROL ELEVATION = 9.90 (FT-NAVD) APPROXIMATE EXISTING GRADE MATCH LOWEST EXISTING ELEV. = 9.79 - 10.00 NAVD 2% MIN. PERIMETER BERM ELEV. = 15.30 MIN. NAVD PERIMETER BERM ELEV. = 15.85 MAX. NAVD (25 YR. MIN. BERM ELEV. = 14.10 NAVD) PROPERTY BOUNDARY SILT FENCE LOT LINE 3:1 MA X 4:1 MAX ELEV. = 14.10 MIN. NAVD ELEV.= 14.60 MAX. NAVD BUFFER VARIES 1.5'VARIES 5.0' SIDE SETBACK VARIESVARIES 4.9' MIN.6.6' MAX.4:1 MAX EXHIBIT C3 of 4 NOT TO SCALEWALDROPENGINEERING CIVIL ENGINEERING &LAND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTSSET NUMBER: SHEET :28100 BONITA GRANDE DRIVE - SUITE 305 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135P: 239-405-7777 F: 239-405-7899 EMAIL: info@waldropengineering.comB:\Projects\1272-200 (Palisades) Plans & Permitting\Drawings-Exhibits\1272-200-02 MCP\Current Plans\12722000207.dwg9/25/2023 9:25:03 AMPUD MASTER PLANPALISADES RPUDFLORIDA CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION #8636PLAN REVISIONSREV00 <<SUBMITTED / BID SET>> XX/XX/XX1272-200-0210/27/2021REVISED PER CLIENT AND COUNTY COMMENTS1212/20/2021REVISED PER CLIENT AND COUNTY COMMENTS306/19/2023REVISED PER CLIENT AND COUNTY COMMENTS408/03/2023REVISED PER CLIENT AND COUNTY COMMENTS3.D.c Packet Pg. 267 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) EXHIBIT C4 of 4 NOT TO SCALEWALDROPENGINEERING CIVIL ENGINEERING &LAND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTSSET NUMBER: SHEET :28100 BONITA GRANDE DRIVE - SUITE 305 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135P: 239-405-7777 F: 239-405-7899 EMAIL: info@waldropengineering.comB:\Projects\1272-200 (Palisades) Plans & Permitting\Drawings-Exhibits\1272-200-02 MCP\Current Plans\12722000207.dwg11/16/2023 11:19:15 AMPUD MASTER PLANPALISADES RPUDFLORIDA CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION #8636PLAN REVISIONSREV00 <<SUBMITTED / BID SET>> XX/XX/XX1272-200-02 NOTES: 1. THIS PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND IS SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION DUE TO AGENCY PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS. 2. ALL ACREAGES ARE APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION AT THE TIME OF SDP OR PLAT APPROVAL. 3. THE SUBJECT SITE CONTAINED APPROXIMATELY 0.18 ACRES OF NATIVE VEGETATION, OF WHICH 15% (.03 ACRES) IS REQUIRED TO BE PRESERVED. NO NATIVE VEGETATION IS PROVIDED FOR ON-SITE. OFF-SITE MITIGATION TO BE PROVIDED PER LDC SEC 3.05.07. 4. THE LOCATION OF THE ONSITE LAKE AND RESIDENTIAL TRACTS IS PRELIMINARY AND MAY BE ADJUSTED AT SITE PLAN APPROVAL. 5. RPUD IS PERMITTED FOR A MAXIMUM OF 36 DWELLING UNITS (3 DU/ACRE) LAND USE SUMMARY RESIDENTIAL 6.1 AC RIGHT-OF-WAY 1.5 AC LAKE 1.7 AC OTHER OPEN SPACE 2.7 AC TOTAL 12.0 +/- AC DEVIATION 1 FROM LDC SECTION 5.03.02.C.2, "FENCES AND WALLS", WHICH PERMITS A MAXIMUM FENCE/WALL HEIGHT OF 6 FEET IN RESIDENTIAL COMPONENTS OF PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICTS, TO ALLOW FOR A MAXIMUM FENCE/WALL/BERM HEIGHT OF 12.50 FEET ALONG THE PUD PERIMETER BOUNDARY. DEVIATION 2 FROM LDC SECTION 6.06.01J, "DEAD-END STREETS", WHICH PROHIBITS DEAD-END STREETS WITHOUT CUL-DE-SACS, TO ALLOW FOR A HAMMERHEAD STUB DESIGN AS SHOWN ON THE PUD MASTER PLAN. DEVIATION 3 FROM LDC SECTION 6.06.01.N, MINIMUM RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTHS", WHICH ESTABLISHES THE MINIMUM RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH OF 60 FEET TO BE UTILIZED, TO ALLOW FOR A 50-FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY INTERNAL PRIVATE RIGHT-OF-WAY. DEVIATION 4: A DEVIATION FROM LDC SECTION 6.06.02A,. "SIDEWALKS, BIKE LANE, AND PATHWAY REQUIREMENTS", WHICH REQUIRES FIVE-FOOT WIDE SIDEWALKS TO BE CONSTRUCTED ON BOTH SIDES OF THE LOCAL/INTERNAL RIGHTS-OF-WAY, TO ALLOW A 6-FOOT-WIDE SIDE SIDEWALK ON ONE SIDE OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. OPEN SPACE SUMMARY REQUIRED OPEN SPACE 7.2 AC PROVIDED OPEN SPACE 7.2 AC 10/27/2021REVISED PER CLIENT AND COUNTY COMMENTS1212/20/2021REVISED PER CLIENT AND COUNTY COMMENTS408/03/2023REVISED PER CLIENT AND COUNTY COMMENTS3.D.c Packet Pg. 268 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applicant Backup Materials (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) Attachment 3 Legal Ad and Sign Posting 3.D.d Packet Pg. 269 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Legal ad and Sign Posting (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) 3.D.d Packet Pg. 270 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Legal ad and Sign Posting (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) 3.D.d Packet Pg. 271 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Legal ad and Sign Posting (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) 3.D.d Packet Pg. 272 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Legal ad and Sign Posting (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) 3.D.d Packet Pg. 273 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Legal ad and Sign Posting (27316 : PL20230011202 - Palisades RPUD) 12/14/2023 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Hearing Examiner Item Number: 3.E Doc ID: 27320 Item Summary: Petition No. VA PL20220003012 - 2560 39th St. SW - Request for a variance from LDC 5.05.09.G.2 that requires the base of a communications tower to be set back from the property line by a distance of two and one-half times the height of the tower to reduce the setback from the northern property line from 375 feet to 72 feet, a reduction of 303 feet; to reduce the setback from the southern property line from 375 feet to 72 feet, a reduction of 303 feet; and to reduce the setback from the eastern property line from 375 feet to 220.7 feet, a reduction of 154.3 feet on a +/-2.38-acre property located at 2560 39th St SW, also known as Golden Gate Estates Unit 28 North 150 feet of Tract 144, in Section 26, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. [Eric Ortman, Planner III] Commissioner District 3 Meeting Date: 12/14/2023 Prepared by: Title: Principal Planner – Zoning Name: Sean Sammon 11/21/2023 5:07 PM Submitted by: Title: Zoning Director – Zoning Name: Mike Bosi 11/21/2023 5:07 PM Approved By: Review: Growth Management Community Development Department Diane Lynch Department review Skipped 11/22/2023 5:33 PM Operations & Regulatory Management Michael Stark Review Item Completed 11/29/2023 8:23 AM Zoning Diane Lynch Review Item Skipped 11/28/2023 1:20 PM Zoning Ray Bellows Review Item Completed 11/30/2023 11:55 AM Zoning Diane Lynch Review Item Skipped 12/01/2023 3:37 PM Zoning Mike Bosi Division Director Completed 12/01/2023 4:03 PM Hearing Examiner (GMD Approvers) Diane Lynch Review Item Completed 12/01/2023 4:42 PM Hearing Examiner Andrew Dickman Meeting Pending 12/14/2023 9:00 AM 3.E Packet Pg. 274 VA-PL20220003012 – Vertical Bridge Communication Tower 1 STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION – ZONING SECTION HEARING DATE: DECEMBER 14, 2023 SUBJECT: VA-PL20220003012, 2560 39TH ST. SW. COMMUNICATION TOWER PROPERTY OWNER/AGENT: REQUESTED ACTION: The petitioner requests a variance from Land Development Code (LDC) Section 5.05.09.G.2, which requires the base of communication towers on commercially zoned land to be separated from the nearest boundary of any parcel of land zoned residential (including Estates, MH, and TTRVC) by of two and one-half times the height of the tower. For this tower, the minimum separation requirement is 375 feet. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: A restaurant, Crackling Jacks, is located on the front portion of the parcel. The cell tower is located within the leased area to maximize its separation from each property boundary. A location map for the property is on page two; the site plan is on page 3. Owner:Applicant: PEG Naples, LLC VB BTS, LLC 1829 Senegal Date Dr.750 Park of Commerce Dr., Ste. 200 Naples, PL. 34119 Boca Raton, FL. 33487 Agent: Mattaniah Jahn, Esq. Mattaniah S. Jahn, P.A. 935 Main St., Ste. C4 Safety Harbor, FL. 34695 The subject property is at 2560 39th St. SW, between 27th Ave. SW and 25th Ave. SW. 39th St. SW runs parallel to Collier Boulevard and is east of Collier Boulevard and Golden Gate City. More specifically, the property is approximately 850 feet south of the intersection of Golden Gate Parkway and Collier Boulevard. Properties abutting 39th St. SW are zoned Estates except for the subject parcel, which is zoned C- 2. PEG Naples, LLC is leasing a portion of the rear of the C-2 zoned parcel marked by the blue star and shown to the right. 3.E.a Packet Pg. 275 Attachment: Staff Report VA-PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VA-PL20220003012 – Vertical Bridge Communication Tower 2 3.E.aPacket Pg. 276Attachment: Staff Report VA-PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge VA-PL20220003012 – Vertical Bridge Communication Tower 3 PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: To comply with FCC guidelines defined in the Code of Federal Regulations Title 47, T-Mobile is deploying 5G services nationwide. Currently, 4G service is the predominant service in Golden Gate City environs. Two towers provide existing service with T-Mobile antennas; one is approximately 2,300 feet from the subject property at 11935 Collier Boulevard, and the other is approximately 5,900 feet from the subject property near the intersection of Golden Gate Parkway and Coronado Parkway. The design of the equipment (enclosure diameter, active/passive cooling, etc.) on these towers cannot support 5G. The applicant retained the services of Pyramid Network Services to conduct a site acquisition process, described in Attachment 1, page 301. The search identified all parcels within the search area. It then methodically began to eliminate parcels based on whether they were not residentially zoned, whether the property owner was or was not interested or, in a few cases, could not be contacted, or where the parcel could accommodate the required tower compound size of 70 feet by 70 feet. Six parcels made it through the screening process and progressed to the advanced stages of negotiation. The search ended with a single parcel that had both a willing owner and met the requirements of PEG Naples, LLC. Search areas are determined by a combination of distance and existing tower coverage, which may result in the search area, outlined in red on the next page, not being a circle as it would be if distance were the only determining factor. Figure 1 - Tower Site Plan Excerpt with Fall Zone  Crackling Jacks & Collier Boulevard 3.E.a Packet Pg. 277 Attachment: Staff Report VA-PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VA-PL20220003012 – Vertical Bridge Communication Tower 4 The applicant proposes to install a 150- foot AGL Monopine Style Telecommunication Tower and related equipment. The monopine will have a canopy of branches extending from the top of the tree line to the top of the tower to help “hide” the tower. LDC 5.05.09.G.2 requires tower bases to be setback from any residential zoning district (including TTRVC and residential PUDs) by two and one-half times the tower height; in this case, that distance is 375 feet. PEG Naples, LLC will lease a fenced-in and landscaped compound measuring 70 feet by 70 feet on the subject property. The tower will be located within the compound to reduce, to the greatest extent possible, the amount of encroachment on any of the three residential parcels that it abuts, which equates to the tower being 72.0 feet from both the northern and southern property boundaries and 220.7 feet from the eastern parcel boundary. The applicant is requesting a variance from LDC 5.05.09.G.2 to reduce the required north and south setbacks from 375 feet to 72 feet and to reduce the east setback from 375 feet to 220.7 feet, a reduction of 303 feet to the north and south, and a reduction of 154.3 feet to the east. Should the variance be approved, the proposed siting of the tower will result in the tower’s fall zone (i.e., the area where a tower would fall should there be a tower failure) being entirely within the subject parcel. Although surrounded by Estates zoned property, the tower itself is on a C-2 zoned parcel and is therefore exempt from LDC 5.05.09.G.25.a, which requires communication towers in the Estates to be on a parcel of at least 2.25 acres and be on an arterial or collector road which 39th St SW is not. The Crackling Jacks restaurant is at the front of the parent parcel, which borders Collier Boulevard, making it harder to see the tower from the road. At the rear of the parcel are high-voltage power lines, an intervening use between the tower and residences. The graphic to the right is an aerial of the proposed tower marked by the blue star. A fair number of existing, mature trees surround the parent parcel, particularly around the proposed compound, helping to camouflage it from view. Also, the tower will be dark at night as its maximum height of 150 feet exempts it from LDC 5.05.09.G.13, which requires towers over 150 feet to be equipped with a red beacon or dual-mode lights. On the next page are three of the twenty photos provided by the applicant that are reasonably representative of the view of the proposed tower from various locations. The twenty photos are included in Attachment 1, beginning on page 277. Power Line 3.E.a Packet Pg. 278 Attachment: Staff Report VA-PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VA-PL20220003012 – Vertical Bridge Communication Tower 5 SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: North: Estates Zoned Northwest: Golden Gate City West: Golden Gate Golf Course MPUD South: Estates Zoned East: Estates Zoned 3.E.a Packet Pg. 279 Attachment: Staff Report VA-PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VA-PL20220003012 – Vertical Bridge Communication Tower 6 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: The subject property has an Estates Designation per the Future Land Use Element (FLUE). However, the property is also identified on Map FLUE-10, which is part of the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) Series, which identifies properties deemed “consistent [with the GMP] by policy” through the implementation of the Zoning Reevaluation Program in the 1990s. Therefore, the property retains its Commercial Convenience (C-2) zoning designation and is consistent with the GMP. STAFF ANALYSIS: This petition requests a variance from 5.05.09.G.2, which requires that the base of a communications tower that is greater than 75 feet in height, up to a height of 185 feet, be separated from the nearest boundary of any parcel of land zoned Estates (E), PUD with a residential density of six dwelling units per acre, TTRVC, and residential districts by a minimum distance of two and one-half times the height of the tower. In this case, the tower is 150 feet, thus requiring a separation of 375 feet (150 * 2.5 = 375). A tower that cannot meet this separation requirement may request a variance in accordance with LDC 9.04.00. The proposed tower cannot meet the 375-foot separation requirement. However, the tower's fall zone, should the tower fail, lies completely within the subject parcel. The decision to grant a variance is based on the criteria in LDC Section 9.04.03. Staff has analyzed this petition relative to these criteria and offers the following responses: a. Are there special conditions and circumstances existing that are peculiar to the location, size, and characteristics of the land, structure, or building involved? Several criteria must be met for the successful location of a 5-G tower, which limits the number of potential locations. These include the area where cellular coverage is needed, local zoning regulations, a property owner willing to lease/sell land to accommodate the tower, and a 70-foot by 70-foot compound to house the necessary equipment. During the site acquisition phase, these criteria effectively reduced the number of potential tower locations to six parcels. The applicant and owner of one of these parcels reached an agreement on leasing a portion of the parcel. Please see the Site Acquisition Memo beginning on page 301 of Attachment 1. b. Are there special conditions and circumstances that do not result from the applicant's action, such as preexisting conditions relative to the property that is the subject of this variance request? The FCC mandate, local zoning ordinances, locational requirements for a tower to operate 5G and a willing landowner from whom to lease property are all issues beyond the applicant's control but are required for a successful 5G communications tower location. The applicant made a concerted effort during the property acquisition process (Attachment 1, page 301), which identified six potential parcels, one of which the applicant reached a lease agreement with the owner. All parcels in search area. 3.E.a Packet Pg. 280 Attachment: Staff Report VA-PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VA-PL20220003012 – Vertical Bridge Communication Tower 7 c. Will a literal interpretation of the provisions of the LDC work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant or create practical difficulties for the applicant? T-Mobile cannot install the tower at the proposed location without the variance. This will leave the existing coverage gap near the proposed tower unresolved and spotty cell coverage for those who l ive near the proposed tower location. d. Will the variance, if granted, be the minimum to make possible the reasonable use of the land, building, or structure and promote health, safety, and welfare standards? The 150-foot monopine tower is the minimum height needed to resolve the capacity gap in the surrounding service area. The sighting of the proposed tower on the property represents the minimum amount of setback relief required. The fall zone of the proposed tower (should a tower failure occur) will be completely within the parcel boundaries. Documentation by a civil engineer lists the tower’s fall zone as 72 feet, which is the distance the tower is being set back from the northern and southern parcel boundaries. (See page 275 of Attachment 1for fall zone certification.) e. Will granting the variance confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by these zoning regulations to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district? No special privilege is being bestowed to the applicant through this petition. Variances are handled on a case-by-case basis and do not set a precedent; approval is based on evaluating the eligibility criteria. This petition has no bearing on another individual, firm, or interest in seeking a dimensional variance. A communications tower's height and design are unique compared to much of the building occurring in Collier County. Communication towers are now designed to have a fall zone (should the tower collapse) that is significantly less than the actual height of the tower (72 feet in this case). The applicant is follow ing guidelines from an FCC mandate concerning cellular coverage. The tower height is the minimum height that will allow for resolving the service gap issue in the proposed area with the proposed technology. f. Will granting the Variance be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Land Development Code and not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare? Communications towers handle 911 Emergency Calls and are considered an essential service. Roughly 84% of the 183,000 Emergency 911 calls received in 2021 were made using wireless devices. The greater the cellular coverage, the greater the chance of a successful 911 call when an emergency arises. In the event of a tower failure, the tower is designed to essentially fold over into itself. It has a fall zone radius of 72 feet, meaning that if the tower were to fail, it would fall within the boundaries of the subject parcel. Enhanced 911 coverage and a limiting fall zone preserve public health, safety, and welfare; the proposed tower is in keeping with the intent of the LDC. g. Are there natural conditions or physically induced conditions that ameliorate the goals and objectives of the regulation, such as natural preserves, lakes, golf courses, etc.? The area of the subject property where the tower is to be constructed is bordered by mature trees, providing visual relief from the tower. The tower is situated on the subject parcel behind an existing restaurant, which helps block the tower's view from the road. A current power line runs perpendicular to the property’s eastern border, where the tower is setback 200 feet from the eastern boundary. There are “pine branches” attached to the tower where it is above the tree line, helping to hide it from view. Attachment 1, page 277, contains 20 photos providing a 360-degree of the tower. Combined, these should help the tower blend into the surroundings to most passersby. 3.E.a Packet Pg. 281 Attachment: Staff Report VA-PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VA-PL20220003012 – Vertical Bridge Communication Tower 8 h. Will granting the variance be consistent with the GMP? The Zoning Reevaluation Program in the 1990s determined that the subject property was “consistent by policy,” retained its C-2 zoning designation, and was therefore consistent with the GMP. As an essential service, communication towers are permitted in C-2 (LDC 2.01.03). ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) RECOMMENDATION: The EAC does not normally hear variance petitions. The EAC did not hear this petition since the subject variance doesn’t impact any preserve area. RECOMMENDATION: To approve variance petition VA-PL20220003012 to reduce the required north and south side yard setbacks from 375 feet to 72 feet, a reduction of 303 feet, and to reduce the rear (east) setback from 375 feet to 220.7 feet, a reduction of 154.3 feet for a communications tower. Attachments: 1. Applicant Back-Up Material 2. Advertising and Sign Posting 3.E.a Packet Pg. 282 Attachment: Staff Report VA-PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) $WWDFKPHQW1 $SSOLFDQW%DFNXS'RFXPHQWV 3.E.b Packet Pg. 283 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) 3.E.b Packet Pg. 284 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) 3.E.b Packet Pg. 285 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Table Of Contents 01 Variance Application............................................................................................................2 01A Cover Letter.......................................................................................................................8 01B Property Information........................................................................................................28 01C Property Owner Disclosure - Fee Simple........................................................................32 01D Adressing Checklist.........................................................................................................36 02 Property Owner Disclosure - Tenant..................................................................................37 03A Agent Authorization - Fee Simple - County Form............................................................39 03B Agent Authorization - Fee Simple - MSJPA Form............................................................40 03C Agent Authorization - Tenant...........................................................................................41 04 US-FL-7040-Senor Tequila_CSDPs_Rev. 0_09.06.2023_S&S.........................................42 05 US-FL-7040_NEPA_081222..............................................................................................64 06 SHPO Backup Documents...............................................................................................259 07 Boundary Survey..............................................................................................................264 08A SunBiz - PEG.................................................................................................................268 08B Sunbiz - VB BTS............................................................................................................269 08C US-FL-7040_MOL_100121...........................................................................................270 08D US-FL-7040_FZL_S&S_072922...................................................................................275 08E Photo Simulations and Line Of Sight Analysis...............................................................277 08F Revised Site Acq Letter.................................................................................................301 08G T-Mobile RF Package....................................................................................................311 08H Landscape Plan.............................................................................................................322 3.E.b Packet Pg. 286 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 2 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 287 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 3 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 288 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 4 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 289 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 5 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 290 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 6 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 291 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 7 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 292 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 8 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 293 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 9 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 294 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 10 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 295 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 11 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 296 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 12 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 297 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 13 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 298 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 14 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 299 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 15 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 300 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 16 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 301 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 17 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 302 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 18 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 303 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 19 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 304 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 20 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 305 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 21 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 306 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 22 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 307 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 23 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 308 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 24 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 309 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 25 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 310 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 26 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 311 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) 11/27/23, 10:40 PM Collier County Property Appraiser https://www.collierappraiser.com 1/1 $ 600,000 $ 364,000 $ 430,000 $ 350,000 $ 275,000 $ 0 $ 309,418 $ 160,570 $ 469,988 $ 469,988 $ 469,988 $ 469,988 Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Summary Parcel No 38054160007 Site Address*Disclaimer 2560 39TH ST SW Site City NAPLES Site Zone*Note 34117 Name / Address PEG NAPLES LLC 1829 SENEGAL DATE DR City NAPLES State FL Zip 34119 Map No.Strap No.Section Township Range Acres£ *Estimated 4B26 334900 144 04B26 26 49 26 2.38 Legal GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 28 N 150FT OF TR 144 Millage Area 28 Millage Rates £ *Calculations Sub./Condo 334900 - GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 28 School Other Total Use Code 21 - RESTAURANTS, CAFETERIAS 4.292 6.2059 10.4979 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 04/30/18 5504-3766 07/14/14 5058-3142 02/01/96 2144-1128 04/22/94 1938-1743 02/01/92 1687-2011 12/01/79 847-1236 2023 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value (+)Improved Value (=)Market Value (=)Assessed Value (=)School Taxable Value (=)Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Page 28 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 312 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) 11/27/23, 10:40 PM Collier County Property Appraiser https://www.collierappraiser.com 1/1 Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Aerial Parcel No 38054160007 Site Address*Disclaimer 2560 39TH ST SW Site City NAPLES Site Zone*Note 34117 Open GIS in a New Window with More Features. Page 29 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 313 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 30 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 314 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 31 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 315 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 32 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 316 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 33 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 317 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 34 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 318 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Addressing Checklist (Rev ϭϬ/2022)Page 1 of 1 Operations & Regulatory Management Division Ɣ1RUWK+RUVHVKRH'ULYHƔ1DSOHV)/Ɣ-- www.colliercountyfl.gov ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following and upload via the CityView Portal with your submittal. Items ŵĂƌŬĞĚǁŝƚŚ;ΎͿare required for every application, other items are optional and may not apply to every project. Forms are valid for 6 months following their submittal; an updated form will be required for a new submittal after that timeframe and any time the properties within the project boundary are modified. Additional documents may be attached to this form and can include: -ΎLOCATION MAP and/or SURVEY showing the proposed project boundary. - List of additional folio numbers and associated legal descriptions. - E-mail from Addressing Official for any pre-approved project and/or street names. LOCATION INFORMATION ΎFOLIO (Property ID) Number(s)of subject property or properties. [Attach list if necessary] ΎLEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties. [Attach list if necessary] STREET ADDRESS(ES)where applicable, if already assigned. PROJECT INFORMATION Acceptance of this form does not constitute project and/or street name approval and is subject to further review by the Addressing Official. Pre-Approval may be requested by contacting us at GMD_Addressing@colliercountyfl.gov or 239-252-2482 prior to your submittal. CURRENT PROJECT NAME PROPOSED PROJECT NAME PROPOSED STREET NAME(s) LATEST APPROVED PROJECT NUMBER [e.g., SDP-94-##, PPL-2002-AR-####, PL2017000####] 38054160007 Please See Attached 2560 39th Street SW, Naples, FL. 34117 US - FL 7040 Senor Tequila US - FL 7040 Senor Tequila N/A N/A Page 36 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 319 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 37 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 320 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 38 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 321 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 39 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 322 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 40 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 323 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 41 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 324 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 42 of 3233.E.bPacket Pg. 325Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Page 43 of 3233.E.bPacket Pg. 326Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Page 44 of 3233.E.bPacket Pg. 327Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Page 45 of 3233.E.bPacket Pg. 328Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Page 46 of 3233.E.bPacket Pg. 329Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Page 47 of 3233.E.bPacket Pg. 330Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Page 48 of 3233.E.bPacket Pg. 331Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Page 49 of 3233.E.bPacket Pg. 332Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Page 50 of 3233.E.bPacket Pg. 333Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Page 51 of 3233.E.bPacket Pg. 334Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Page 52 of 3233.E.bPacket Pg. 335Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Page 53 of 3233.E.bPacket Pg. 336Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Page 54 of 3233.E.bPacket Pg. 337Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Page 55 of 3233.E.bPacket Pg. 338Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Page 56 of 3233.E.bPacket Pg. 339Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Page 57 of 3233.E.bPacket Pg. 340Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Page 58 of 3233.E.bPacket Pg. 341Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Page 59 of 3233.E.bPacket Pg. 342Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Page 60 of 3233.E.bPacket Pg. 343Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Page 61 of 3233.E.bPacket Pg. 344Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Page 62 of 3233.E.bPacket Pg. 345Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Page 63 of 3233.E.bPacket Pg. 346Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge (716)580Ͳ7000www.thelotisgroup.comLotisEnvironmental,LLC8899MainStreet,Suite107 Williamsville,NY14221 August 12, 2022 Mr. Qabiyl Johnson VB BTS, LLC 750 Park of Commerce Drive, Suite 200 Boca Raton, Florida 33487 RE: FCC NEPA Summary Report for: Senor Tequila Site (US-FL-7040) near 2560 39th Street Southwest Naples, Collier County, Florida 34117 Dear Mr. Johnson, Lotis Environmental, LLC (Lotis), has completed a Federal Communications Commission (FCC) NEPA investigation relative to the referenced proposed undertaking and issues the following Summary Report. Based on the information presented in this report, no further action is required under 47 CFR Subpart 1, Chapter 1, Sections 1.1301-1.1319 of the National Environmental Policy Act. The accuracy of the species list, provided by the Information, Planning, and Conservation (IPaC) website, should be verified every 90 days. This verification can be completed formally or informally as desired. The United States Fish and Wildlife Services (USFWS) recommends that verification be completed by visiting the IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested through the IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the initial list. If the list is determined to have been modified to include additional species of concern, an evaluation of those species should be conducted and consultation with the USFWS may have to be re-initiated, depending on the determination of effect or previous response(s) from the USFWS. The applicant/tower builder must immediately notify all interested consulting parties if archaeological properties or human remains are discovered during construction, consistent with Section IX of the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement and applicable law. Should you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact our office at (716) 276.8707. Sincerely, Lotis Environmental, LLC David N. Robinson, P.E. President/CEO Robinson@TheLotisGroup.com Attachments Page 64 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 347 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) NEPA SUMMARY REPORT August 12, 2022 US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila near 2560 39th Street Southwest Naples, Florida 34117 Prepared for: VB BTS, LLC 750 Park of Commerce Drive, Suite 200 Boca Raton, Florida 33487 Prepared by: Lotis Environmental, LLC Williamsville, New York Reviewed By: David N. Robinson, P.E. President/CEO Prepared By: Miles Walz-Salvador Nationwide NEPA Manager Page 65 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 348 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC Page 1 US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila FCC NEPA CHECKLIST Applicant Name: VB BTS, LLC Site Number: US-FL-7040 Site Name: Senor Tequila Potential Effect LAND USE SCREENING Yes No 1.Is the proposed undertaking located in an officially designated wilderness area? X 2.Is the proposed undertaking located in an officially designated wildlife preserve? X 3. Will the proposed undertaking likely affect threatened or endangered species or designated critical habitats; or is likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any proposed endangered or threatened species; or is likely to result in the destruction or adverse modification of proposed critical habitats (as determined by the Endangered Species Act of 1973)? X 4. Will the proposed undertaking affect districts, sites, building, structures, or objects, significant in American history, architecture, archeology, engineering, or culture, that are listed (or eligible for listing) in the National Register of Historic Places? X 5.Will the proposed undertaking affect Native American religious site(s)? X 6.Is the proposed undertaking located within a flood plain (100 or 500-year)? *EA not required under FCC Wireless Telecommunications Docket No. 17-79 effective July 2, 2018, as long as the applicant can show that the facility/associated equipment will be installed 1 foot above the determined BFE. X 7.Will construction of the proposed undertaking involve significant change in surface features (e.g., wetland fill, deforestation, or water diversion)? X 8.Is the proposed undertaking located in a residential neighborhood and is it required to be equipped with high intensity white lights (as defined by local zoning law)? X 9. a.) Will the antenna structure equal or exceed total power (of all channels) of 2000 Watts ERP (3280 Watts EIRP) and have antenna located less than 10 meters above ground level? X b.) Will the antenna structure equal or exceed total power (of all channels) of 2000 Watts ERP (3280 Watts EIRP) and have antenna located less than 10 meters above floor level? X Prepared By: Miles Walz-Salvador Nationwide NEPA Manager Page 66 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 349 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC Page 2 US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila DOCUMENTATION FOR FCC NEPA CHECKLIST RESPONSES 1-9: 1. Is the proposed undertaking located in an officially designated wilderness area? Based on maps published by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), United States Forest Service (USFS), and National Park Service (NPS), as compiled in the on-line nationalatlas.gov and wilderness.net websites, no designated wilderness areas are located at or near the proposed undertaking. A copy of the Wilderness Map is included in Appendix A. 2. Is the proposed undertaking located in an officially designated wildlife preserve? Based on maps published by the USFWS, no wildlife refuges or wildlife preserves are located at or near the proposed undertaking. A copy of the USFWS Wildlife Refuge Map is included in Appendix A. 3. Will the proposed undertaking likely affect threatened or endangered species or designated critical habitats; or is likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any proposed endangered or threatened species; or is likely to result in the destruction or adverse modification of proposed critical habitats (as determined by the Endangered Species Act of 1973)? A Lotis staff biologist conducted an informal biological assessment (IBA) at the site of the proposed undertaking. Based on information reviewed, site reconnaissance, and the proposed scope of work, Lotis has determined that the proposed undertaking will have “No Effect” on designated critical habitats or listed federal species of concern. A copy of the USFWS Critical Habitat Map is included in Appendix A. The accuracy of the species list, provided by the Information, Planning, and Conservation (IPaC) website, should be verified every 90 days. This verification can be completed formally or informally as desired. The USFWS recommends that verification be completed by visiting the IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested through the IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the initial list. If the list is determined to have been modified to include additional species of concern, an evaluation of said species should be conducted and consultation under USFWS guidelines may have to be re-initiated, depending on the determination of effect or previous response from the USFWS. Additionally, Lotis reviewed the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) list of species of concern and their corresponding habitats and determined that the proposed undertaking will have “No Effect” on state species of concern. The state species list was obtained by using the FWC’s “Florida Natural Areas Inventory Biodiversity Matrix Query Results.” Copies of the Lotis IBA, the state species list and the IPaC email are included in Appendix B. Per Section 7 consultation guidelines promulgated by the USFWS, (pet the USFWS guidance for completing project reviews under the Endangered Species Act), “The ESA does not require Federal agencies to consult with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service if the action agency determines their Federal action has "no effect" on federally listed species or designated critical habitat.” Due to Lotis’ determination of “No Effect” on critical habitat and listed federal species of concern, Section 7 consultation is considered complete, and no further consultation is required. Should the proposed undertaking be revised, Lotis’ previous determination of effect should be considered invalid and be revised to reflect the new proposed undertaking. Copies of the USFWS guidance, IPaC receipt, and Lotis’ informal biological assessment (IBA) are included in Appendix B. Additionally, the USFWS has established interim guidelines for recommendations on communication tower siting, construction, operation, and decommissioning as new and existing towers have been determined to significantly impact species which are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA), http://www.fws.gov/laws/lawsdigest/migtrea.html, (16 U.S.C. 703-712). The MBTA prohibits the taking, killing, possession, transportation, and importation of migratory birds, their eggs, parts, and nests, except when specifically authorized by the Department of the Interior. While the Act has no provision for allowing unauthorized take, it must be recognized that some birds may be killed at structures such as communications towers even if all reasonable Page 67 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 350 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC Page 3 US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila measures to avoid it are implemented. While it is not possible under the Act to absolve individuals or companies from liability if they follow these recommended guidelines, the Division of Law Enforcement and Department of Justice have used enforcement and prosecutorial discretion in the past regarding individuals or companies who have made good faith efforts to avoid the take of migratory birds. A copy of the 2013 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Revised Voluntary Guidelines for Communication Tower Design, Siting, Construction, Operation, Retrofitting, and Decommissioning is included in Appendix B. VB BTS has taken these recommended interim guidelines into consideration and has mitigated the potential effect on migratory birds by siting the proposed undertaking away from sensitive locations such as critical habitats, wilderness areas, wildlife refuges, and wetlands, where species of concern are more likely to be present. Additionally, VB BTS proposes a tower height of no more than 199 feet with a tower design to be that of a self- supporting monopole tower. If lighting is required, VB BTS will complete request the use of dual medium white or red strobe lights with the minimum number, minimum intensity, and minimum number of flashes per minute allowable by the FAA. It should also be noted that the proposed undertaking is located within 0.58 miles of an existing 162-foot guyed telecommunication tower to the southwest. The USFWS also regulates and enforces the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668-668c). “This Act provides criminal penalties for persons who "take, possess, sell, purchase, barter, offer to sell, purchase or barter, transport, export or import, at any time or any manner, any bald eagle ... [or any golden eagle], alive or dead, or any part, nest, or egg thereof." The Act defines "take" as "pursue, shoot, shoot at, poison, wound, kill, capture, trap, collect, molest or disturb." "Disturb" means “to agitate or bother a bald or golden eagle to a degree that causes, or is likely to cause, based on the best scientific information available, 1) injury to an eagle, 2) a decrease in its productivity, by substantially interfering with normal breeding, feeding, or sheltering behavior, or 3) nest abandonment, by substantially interfering with normal breeding, feeding, or sheltering behavior." In addition to immediate impacts, this definition also covers impacts that result from human-induced alterations initiated around a previously used nest site during a time when eagles are not present, if, upon the eagle's return, such alterations agitate or bother an eagle to a degree that interferes with or interrupts normal breeding, feeding, or sheltering habits, and causes injury, death, or nest abandonment. A violation of the Act can result in a fine of $100,000 ($200,000 for organizations), imprisonment for one year, or both, for a first offense. Penalties increase substantially for additional offenses, and a second violation of this Act is a felony.” USFWS: The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act, https://www.fws.gov/northeast/ecologicalservices/pdf/NationalBaldEagleManagementGuidelines.pdf (accessed January 2022). A copy of the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act is included in Appendix B. In addition, Lotis contacted the FWC in November on 20220 regarding consultation for telecommunication facility. In their response they indicated “Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) staff received your firm’s request for review regarding standard, macro telecommunication tower project sites throughout Florida. The combined height of the monopoles or self-support lattice structures plus telecommunications equipment is normally between 50 and 300 feet tall. Installation may also include clearing for 100-foot by 100-foot compounds and access easements adjacent to the towers. Each site will be reviewed for the following prior to construction activities: the presence of federal or state-listed species; the presence of suitable habitat for federal or state-listed species; presence on-site or nearby (within 1 mile) of critical habitats or wildlife refuges; presence and potential impacts to wetlands; and each site will be surveyed as appropriate prior to development.” “For the purpose of required Federal Communications Commission National Environmental Policy Act screenings for these installations, FWC staff have no comments, recommendations, or objections related to state-listed species and their habitat or other fish and wildlife resources to offer at this time and for the time period of one year from the date of this letter. The liability to not impact or cause “take” of listed species, migratory wildlife, and other regulated species of wildlife is the responsibility of the applicant or developer associated with each site. Please refer to the Florida Administrative Code, Chapter 68A-27, for definitions of “take” and a list of federally and state-listed species. If listed species are observed on-site in the future or if project design details change, FWC staff are available to provide decision support information or assist in obtaining the appropriate permits.” Copies of the FWC categorical clearance statement and Lotis’ IBA are included in Appendix B. Lastly, Lotis contacted the Florida State Clearinghouse (FSC) on June 3, 2022, and requested a review of the potential adverse effect on state protected habitats and state listed species of concern. On June 8, 2022, Chris Stahl, Coordinator for the Florida State Clearinghouse under the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, responded to Lotis’ review request indicating “While it is covered by EO 12372, the Florida State Clearinghouse Page 68 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 351 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC Page 4 US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila does not select the project for review. You may proceed with your project.” Copies of the submission letter and FSC’s response are included in Appendix B. Both the USFWS and FWC have recommended additional mitigation as indicated above. These are recommendations and should be treated as such unless issued as a requirement to mitigate/prevent adverse effect on habitat and species of concern. Should failure to abide by these recommendations occur, the applicant is assuming responsibility for their failure in compliance with the above mentioned Endangered Species Act, Migratory Bird Treaty Act, and The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. It is ultimately, the responsibility of the applicant to prevent the “take” of a species of concern regardless of whether or not it has completed Section 7 consultation. The term “take” means to harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, collect, or to attempt to engage in any such conduct. The taking of a listed species of concern (threatened/Endangered), without a federal/state permit, is a severe crime punishable by large fine(s) and confinement. 4. Will the proposed undertaking affect districts, sites, buildings, structures, or objects, significant in American history, architecture, archeology, engineering, or culture, that are listed (or eligible for listing) in the National Register of Historic Places? The Division of Historical Resources (DHR) is the lead State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) for the State of Florida. Lotis contracted Subterranean Consultants, on April 21, 2022, to determine the potential effect of the proposed undertaking on historic properties (archaeological sites and eligible/listed historic properties) within the Direct and ½-mile Visual Area of Potential Effect (APE) designated by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Subterranean Consultants, completed a Cultural Resources Assessment and conducted research to identify historic properties using resources specified by the DHR. Additionally, Subterranean Consultants, researched the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) at http://www.nps.gov/nr/ and did not identify any historic properties within the ½-mile radius APE of the proposed undertaking. A copy of Cultural Resources Assessment is included in Attachment 3. Lotis prepared and submitted a new tower submission packet (FCC Form 620) through the FCC’s E-106 electronic filing protocol. Section 106 review was initially submitted via E-106 to the Florida SHPO on June 3, 2022; however, the Florida SHPO does not participate in E-106 electronic filing and requested that materials be sent via regular mail to 500 South Bronough Street R.A. Gray Building, Room 305, Tallahassee, Florida, 32399 and email for review. On June 3, 2022, Lotis forwarded the requested hardcopy packet via USPS. On June 27, 2022, Lotis received an email response from the DHR indicating “Based on the information provided, it is the opinion of this office that the proposed project will have NO EFFECT on historic properties listed, or eligible for listing, in the NRHP.” Copies of the DHR submission cover letter, FCC Form 620, and the DHR response are included in Appendix C. In furtherance of Section 106 consultation efforts, Lotis attempted to contact the jurisdiction’s Certified Local Government (CLG), Mr. Timothy Finn using the National Parks Service’s website, http://grantsdev.cr.nps.gov/ CLG_Review/search.cfm. On June 3, 2022, Lotis contacted Mr. Finn’s office, and invited them to comment on whether the proposed undertaking would have an effect on historic properties within the general vicinity. To date, Lotis has not received a response from their office relative to the proposed undertaking. Copies of the submission cover letter and email submission are included in Attachment 7. In addition, Lotis submitted an information package to the Collier County Museum on June 3, 2022. To date, Lotis has not received a response from the Collier County Museum relative to the proposed undertaking. Copies of the submission letter and email submission are included in Attachment 8. Finally, Lotis contacted The Naples Daily News and published a legal public notice in the classified section on July 17, 2022. The proposed undertaking was detailed in the ad and calls for public concerns regarding potential adverse effect on historic properties in the area were solicited. To date, Lotis has not received any public response from the public notice publication concerning the proposed undertaking’s potential effect on historic properties. Copies of the legal public notice text, tear sheet, and Affidavit of Publication are included in Attachment 8. 5. Will the undertaking affect Native American religious site(s)? Lotis utilized the FCC’s Tower Construction Notification System (TCNS) to identify tribal entities with interest in the proposed undertaking. The initial TCNS filing was submitted on May 10, 2022. The FCC responded via e-mail on May 13, 2022, indicating that six (6) nationally recognized tribes were forwarded information regarding the location Page 69 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 352 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC Page 5 US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila of the proposed undertaking via electronic or regular mail. The Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida, Seminole Tribe of Florida, Seminole Nation of Oklahoma, Muscogee (Creek) Nation, Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma, and the Thlopthlocco Tribal Town required additional information delivered to them. The requested documentation was forwarded to the tribes via registered mail or email on June 3, 2022. As of the date of this report, Lotis received clearance from all interested tribes. FCC Wireless Telecommunications Docket No. 17-79 effective July 2, 2018, replaces procedures outlined in the 2005 Declaratory Ruling and establishes a 45-day process for proceeding with construction in cases in which Tribal Nations or NHOs do not respond. Referral can be completed and submitted to the FCC if a correspondence is not received within 30 calendar days (for emailed tribes) and 35 calendar days (for mailed tribes). Upon notice the FCC will communicate by letter or email with the respective tribe(s) giving them 15 days to respond. The FCC’s final 15- day letter was sent July 28, 2022, to the non-responding party(s). According to the FCC Wireless Telecommunications Docket No. 17-79, when no response is received from the tribe(s) within 15 days from the FCC’s contact it is deemed to have no interest in pre-construction review a consultation is considered complete. Documentation of all original submission cover letters, referral(s) to the FCC, and tribal clearances are included in Appendix D of this report. Copies of the Federal Lands Map and Indian Reservations Map are included in Appendix A. 6. Is the proposed undertaking located within a flood plain (100 or 500-year)? According to the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) for the Collier County Unincorporated Areas, Florida (Map Number 12021C0416H) published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) effective on May 16, 2022 and exported on May 25, 2022, the proposed undertaking is partially located within a 100-year floodplain. However, Per the FCC Wireless Telecommunications Docket No. 17-79 effective July 2, 2018, an EA not required as long as the applicant can show that the facility/associated equipment will be installed 1-foot above the determined BFE. According to the FAA tower certification document (provided by Geoline Surveying, Inc.), the tower and associated equipment is located at 12.7’ while the surrounding BFE is listed as 11.5 feet. Therefore, per the FCC guidance an EA is not required. Copies of the FIRMette (flood plain map) and the 1-foot above BFE commitment statement are included in Appendix E. Copies of the FIRMette (flood plain map) and the FAA Tower Certification are included in Appendix E. 7. Will construction of the proposed undertaking involve significant change in surface features (e.g., wetland fill, deforestation, or water diversion)? According to the online United States Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetlands Inventory Map (NWIM), http://www.fws.gov/wetlands/Data/Mapper.html, for the proposed undertaking, no mapped wetlands are located at or within close proximity to the proposed undertaking. Additionally, Lotis has determined that no significant deforestation or water diversion is anticipated due to the proposed undertaking. A copy of the National Wetlands Inventory Map is included in Appendix F. 8. Is the proposed undertaking located in a residential neighborhood and is it required to be equipped with high intensity white lights (as defined by local zoning law)? The proposed undertaking is assumed not to be equipped with high intensity white lights nor located within a zoned residential neighborhood. Should the applicant decide to place high intensity lighting on the proposed undertaking, additional consultation will be recommended. 9. a.) Will the antenna structure equal or exceed total power (of all channels) of 2000 Watts ERP (3280 Watts EIRP) and have antenna located less than 10 meters above ground level? An evaluation to determine whether RF emission standards are met was not included as part of this report. Lotis assumes that client representatives will evaluate the project to ensure compliance with applicable RF standards. If the antenna structure is equal or exceed total power (of all channels) of 2000 Watts ERP (3280 Watts EIRP) and have antenna located less than 10 meters above ground level further consultation is required for NEPA due diligence. Page 70 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 353 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC Page 6 US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila b.) Will the antenna structure equal or exceed total power (of all channels) of 2000 Watts ERP (3280 Watts EIRP) and have antenna located less than 10 meters above floor level? An evaluation to determine whether RF emission standards are met was not included as part of this report. Lotis assumes that client representatives will evaluate the project to ensure compliance with applicable RF standards. If the antenna structure equal or exceed total power (of all channels) of 2000 Watts ERP (3280 Watts EIRP) and have antenna is located less than 10 meters above floor level further consultation is required for NEPA due diligence. National Historic and Scenic Trail Review Per the Per the 1999 “Siting of Wireless Telecommunications facilities Near National Scenic Trails Resolution early notification is not necessary if the “Proposed sites that are more than one mile from a National Scenic Trail are outside the scope of this Resolution. Under certain circumstances, MSTOs and Applicants may find it mutually beneficial to have a cooperative working relationship on proposed sites that are more than one mile but less than four miles from a National Scenic Trail, particularly when constructing new or expanded towers 200 feet or higher above ground level which require lighting. While the signatories to this Resolution strongly encourage the formation of such alliances, the MSTO and the Applicant are not obligated to do so.” The proposed undertaking is located more than 4 miles from the closest national scenic historic trail. Therefore, no additional consultation is required. A copy of the National Historic and Scenic Trail Map is included in Appendix A. National Scenic Riverway Review Congress enacted the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (WSRA) in 1968, declaring it the “policy of the United States that certain selected rivers of the Nation which, with their immediate environments, possess outstandingly remarkable scenic, recreational, geologic, fish and wildlife, historic, cultural, or other similar values, shall be preserved in free- flowing condition, and that they and their immediate environments shall be protected for the benefit and enjoyment of present and future generations.” 16 U.S.C. § 1271. As originally enacted, the WSRA named specific rivers or segments of rivers for inclusion in the Wild and Scenic River System (“WSRS”). Id. § 1274(a)(1)-(a)(8). The proposed undertaking is located more than ten (10) miles from the closest national scenic riverway. Therefore, no additional consultation is required. A copy of the National Scenic Riverway Map is included in Appendix A. National Scenic Byway Review The National Scenic Byways Program was established under the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) of 1991 and is part of the Department of Transportation's (DOT) Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). The program is a grass-roots collaborative effort established to help recognize, preserve, and enhance selected roads throughout the United States. Pursuant to the program, the Secretary of Transportation recognizes certain roads as All-American Roads or National Scenic Byways based on one or more archeological, cultural, historic, natural, recreational, and scenic qualities. The proposed undertaking is located more than ten (10) miles from the closest national byway. Therefore, no additional consultation is required. A copy of the National Scenic Byway Map is included in Appendix A. Page 71 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 354 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila PROPOSED PROJECT SUMMARY Site Name: Senor Tequila Site Address: near 2560 39th Street Southwest Naples, Florida 34117 Latitude/Longitude: 26° 10’ 55.91” ±N / -81° 41’ 06.58” ±W County: Collier County UTM: Zone: 17R East: 431535 North: 2896041 Legal Description: Township: 49S, Range: 26E, Section: 026 Consultant Information: Company: Lotis Environmental, LLC (Lotis) Consultant: Miles Walz-Salvador Email: NEPA.NHPA@TheLotisGroup.com Address: 8899 Main Street – Suite 107 Williamsville, New York 14221 Phone: (716) 580-7000 Project Description: Proposed construction of a 145’ (155’ including all appurtenances) monopine telecommunication tower within a 70’ by 70’ lease area. A proposed 20’ by 563’ access easement will extend north then generally west connecting with 39th Street Southwest. Additionally, a proposed 10’ by 505’ utility easement will extend south then west connecting with 39th Street Southwest. Project Impacts: Excavation and grade work to install tower foundation, utilities, and access easements. Project Area: Square Footage: ~21,210 / Acres: ~0.4869146 Present Land Use: partially disturbed lot Past Land Use: partially disturbed lot Page 72 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 355 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila Appendix A Maps Page 73 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 356 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 74 of 323Site Location3.E.bPacket Pg. 357Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Page 75 of 323 Site Location 3.E.b Packet Pg. 358 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) HawaiiAlaskaHONOLULUHAWAIIHawaiiMauiOahuKauaiNiihauMolokaiPACIFIC OCEANYukon PACIFIC OCEANGULF OF ALASKABERING SEAARCTIC OCEAN BEAUFORT SEA MAINEVT.N.H.N.J.N.J.DEL.CONN.MD.VIRGINIADEL.MD.VA.NORTH CAROLINASOUTH CAROLINAKENTUCKYTENNESSEEMISSISSIPPILOUISIANATEXASOKLAHOMAKANSASNEBRASKASOUTH DAKOTANORTH DAKOTAMONTANAWASHINGTONOREGONCALIFORNIANEVADAARIZONANEW MEXICOUTAHIDAHOWYOMINGCOLORADOARKANSASALABAMAGEORGIAFLORIDAOHIOINDIANAILLINOISMICHIGANWISCONSINIOWAMISSOURIMINNESOTAMASS.R.I.NEW YORKPENNSYLVANIAWESTVIRGINIAALASKAUNITED STATESMEXICOCANADA UNITED STATESUNITED STATES CANADAUNITED ST A T E S M EX IC O UNITED STATESCANADAOLYMPIASALEMPORTLANDOREGON CITYHELENABOZEMANOGDENMISSOULAGREAT FALLSBISMARCKBILLINGSFARGOAUGUSTAMONTPELIERBUFFALOCONCORDBOISELOSANGELESSAN DIEGORIVERSIDELAS VEGASMINNEAPOLISST. PAULALBANYSYRACUSEROCHESTERPIERREPROVIDENCEHARTFORDNEW YORK CITYLANSINGGRAND RAPIDSMADISONTRENTONPHILADELPHIAPITTSBURGHDES MOINESCHEYENNECASPERCARSONCITYSACRAMENTOLINCOLNOMAHACOUNCIL BLUFFSST. JOSEPHATCHISONCOLUMBUSDAYTONCINCINNATICLEVELANDAKRONTOLEDODETROITMILWAUKEECHICAGOANNAPOLISWASHINGTON, D.C.BALTIMOREDOVERINDIANAPOLISSPRINGFIELDST. LOUISNAUVOOTOPEKAFRANKFORTJEFFERSON CITYKANSAS CITYINDEPENDENCERALEIGHCHARLOTTEMORGANTONABINGDONNASHVILLEELIZABETHTONCHATTANOOGAOKLAHOMA CITYTAHLEQUAHCOLUMBIACHARLESTONLITTLE ROCKPHOENIXTUCSONSALT LAKECITYALBUQUERQUEDURANGOEL PASOMONTGOMERYSELMAATLANTAMEMPHISJACKSONNATCHEZNEWORLEANSTALLAHASSEEPENSACOLAHILOKAILUA-KONAJACKSONVILLETAMPAORLANDOMIAMIST. PETERSBURGBATONROUGEAUSTINSAN ANTONIODALLASFT WORTHHOUSTONCHARLESTONRICHMONDNORFOLKSee inset map belowWINSTON-SALEMHARRISBURGSEATTLEBOSTONSANTA FEDENVERSAN FRANCISCONOMEANCHORAGESEWARDJUNEAUBATTLECREEKBOULDERCHARLOTTESVILLEWILLIAMSBURGCORVALLISCUMBERLANDDULUTHEUGENEFAYETTEVILLECOLLEGE STATIONNACOGDOCHESFLAGSTAFFGRAND JUNCTIONHAGERSTOWNHUNTSVILLECLEVELAND ITHACAJANESVILLEJOHNSON CITYLAREDOLAS CRUCESLAWRENCELEWISTONMONTEREYMURFREESBOROMUSKEGONNAPLESNEWPORTAMHERSTSPRINGFIELDOAKLANDSTOCKTONPOCATELLOPOUGHKEEPSIEPITTSFIELDREDDINGMEDFORDRENOKENNEWICKRICHLANDPASCOROANOKEELKINSALINASSAN JOSESANTA BARBARASAN LUISOBISPOST. GEORGESIOUX CITYSPRINGFIELDUTICAWILMINGTONVIRGINIABEACHANNAPOLISWASHINGTON, D.C.BALTIMOREDOVERRICHMONDNORFOLKWILLIAMSBURGVIRGINIABEACHWAUSAUWEST PALM BEACHYUMA95938784806878 64 64 85 40 95 9526 20 20 40 59 24 655559124920103035274440357070452010353785 85 75 75 10 65 41695 81 79 77 81 64 64 5755247244358080297575746571656970 83 64 85 9570 83 76 79 94 94 96 43 90 39 3590909086707615848415825558101017401925258080299443 88 39557469 75 75 70 77 71 818188919095908980909094196135LakeOkeechobeeFingerLakesColumbia S n a ke Missouri Yellowstone GreatSaltLakeLake ofthe WoodsPyramidLakeWalkerLakeSalton SeaS acramento Sa n Jo a q u i n Green Pecos Canadian Niobrara Arkansas Platte M isso uri Tennessee M i ssis s i ppi Mississippi W hite A rkansas Ohio Colorado Rio Grande LAKE ONTARIO LAKE H U R O N LAKE SUPERIOR LAKE MICHIGAN LAKE ERIE GULF OF MEXICOATLANTICOCEANPACIFICOCEANAlabama Bureau of Land ManagementNational Forest SystemMEM MemorialNB National BattlefieldNBP National Battlefield ParkNHP National Historical ParkNHS National Historic SiteNL National LakeshoreNM National MonumentN MEM National MemorialNMP National Military ParkNP National ParkN PRES National PreserveNRA National Recreation AreaNRR National Recreational RiverN RES National ReserveNS National SeashoreNSR National Scenic RiverwayPKWY ParkwayNF National ForestNG National GrasslandNWR National Wildlife RefugeFish and Wildlife ServiceNote: Abbreviations at right are for federal lands shown on this map. In many places, exact trail locations have not yet been determined. Portions of the trails indicated on this map may not be accessible for public use. Please check with individual trail clubs and man-aging offices for the latest available trail locations. National Park SystemMap revised April 2010.Only national park, forest areas, andwildlife refuges that relate to theNational Trails System are shown.Bear LakeNWRBear Valley NWRClear Lake NWRDeer Flat NWRFranz Lake NWRGrays Lake NWRJulia ButlerHansen NWRLewis and Clark NWRLower Klamath NWRMcNary NWRPierceNWRRidgefieldNWRRuby Lake NWRSteigerwald Lake NWRThree ArchRocks NWRTule Lake NWRUmatillaNWRWillapa NWRWilliam L. FinleyNWRSequoyahNWRSevilleta NWRMaxwell NWRBosque Del Apache NWRWhittleseyCreekNWRTwo Rivers NWRTamaracNWRSwan Lake NWRSquaw Creek NWROzark Cavefish NWRDesoto NWRCypressCreekNWRBig Muddy NWRWheelerNWRWhite RiverNWRTennessee NWRSt. Marks NWRLower Hatchie NWRHolla BendNWRChickasaw NWRWallkill River NWRIndependence NHPMorristown NHP131516141Ohio RiverIslands NWR97361211510181718172481315202019191614197361211510248Long Lake NWRSeedskadee NWRBentonLakeNWRCokevilleMeadowsNWRFish SpringsNWRCharles M. RussellNWRAudubon NWRLake IloNWRLake Andes NWRBoyer Chute NWRUl BendNWRKarl E. Mundt NWRNorth Platte NWRLee Metcalf NWRBlackwaterEastern NeckEastern Shore Of VirginiaFeatherstoneFisherman IslandJames RiverMartinMason NeckNansemondOccoquan BayPlum Tree IslandPresquileRappahannock River ValleySusquehanna1234567891011121314Colonial NHPFort McHenry NMGeorge Washington Birthplace NMPiscataway ParkPrince William Forest ParkRichmond NBP151617181920Chesapeake Bay areaNational Wildlife RefugesNational Park sitesInnoko NWRAlaska MaritimeNWRBoston Harbor Islands NRAMount BakerNFOlympic NFOkanoganNFColvilleNFKaniksuNFKootenaiNFWenatcheeNFSnoqualmieNFGiffordPinchot NFMountHood NFWillametteNFUmpquaNFRogue River NFKlamathNFTahoeNFEldoradoNFStanislausNFSierraNFSequoiaNFAngelesNFClevelandNFCoronado NFChugachNFApacheNFCibolaNFCarson NFSanIsabelNFSan Juan NFRioGrandeNFGunnisonNFWhite River NFArapaho NFPike NFRouttNFRooseveltNFMedicineBow NFShoshoneNFTetonNFTargheeNFGallatinNFGallatinNFCusterNFBeaverheadNFSalmonNFBitterrootNFDeer LodgeNFLolo NFLoloNFLewis and Clark NFLewis and ClarkNFLittleMissouriNGChippewaNFChequamegonNFShawneeNFWayneNFJeffersonNFCherokeeNFCherokeeNFNantahalaNFChattahocheeNFApalachicolaNFOsceolaNFOcalaNFPisgahNFGeorgeWashingtonNFGreenMountainNFWhiteMountainNFFingerLakesNFAlleghenyNFMark TwainNFOuachitaNFOzarkNFOzarkNFOttawaNFSuperior NFHiawathaNFHiawathaNFManisteeNFSheyenneNGFt PierreNGHelenaNFFlatheadNFNez PerceNFClearwaterNFUmatillaNFUmatillaNFWhitman NFWallowaNFBridgerNFCaribouNFCache NFCurlewNGSawtoothNFSawtoothNFHumboldtNFHumboldtNFHumboldtNFHumboldtNFHumboldtNFDixieNFKaibabNFKaibabNFCoconinoNFTontoNFFishlakeNFToiyabe NFToiyabeNFWasatchNFUnitaNFKiowaNGComancheNGCimarronNGSanta FeNFSanta FeNFCibolaNFGilaNFSanBernardinoNFLos Padres NFLos Padres NFShastaNFModocNFLassenNFPlumasNFToiyabeNFInyo NFDeschutesNFWinemaNFGolden Gate NRACity ofRocksN RESBigCypressN PRESBigHoleNBBear PawBattlefieldCowpensNBChickamauga andChattanoogaNMPStones RiverNBKings MountainNMPLewis and ClarkNHPJefferson NationalExpansion MEMPicturedRocks NLNez PerceNHPPecosNHPSan Antonio MissionsNHPChamizalN MEMTumacacoriNHPFort UnionNMHagerman FossilBeds NMChimney RockNHSScotts BluffNMPinnacles NMDevils PostpileNMGuadalupe-Nipomo DunesNWRGeorgeWashingtonMemorialPKWYSaguaroNPWalnut Canyon NMLake ChelanNRADelaware Water Gap NRAFort StanwixNMSanta MonicaMountains NRAGulf Islands NSEl MalpaisNMNorthCascadesNPGlacierNPMount RainierNPOlympicNPYellowstoneNPCrater LakeNPLassen VolcanicNPRockyMountainNPYosemiteNPShenandoahNP KingsCanyonNPDeathValleyNPMojaveN PRESLake MeadNRAGlen CanyonNRAGrand CanyonNPArchesNPColoradoNMCurecantiNRAGreat Sand DunesNPSequoiaNPGreat SmokyMountains NPHawai‘i VolcanoesNPPu‘uhonua o HönaunauNHPKaloko-HonoköhauNHPPu‘ukoholä HeiauNHSFort SmithNHSPea Ridge NMPBent’s OldFort NHSFort LarnedNHSFort UnionTrading PostNHSKnife RiverIndian VillagesNHSFort LaramieNHSFort Vancouver NHSChesapeakeand OhioCanal NHPHarpersFerryNHPBlue Ridge PKWY (follows Natchez Trace PKWY) Saint Croix NSR Missouri NRR NEZ PERCE (NEE-ME-POO)NATIONAL HISTORIC TRAILO R E G O N N A T IO N A L H IST O R IC T R A IL CALIF O R N IA N A T IO N A L S C E N I C T RAIL P A C IF IC CRE S T NATIONAL HISTORIC TRAIL PONY EXPRESS NATIONAL HISTORIC TRAILOLD SPANISH NATIONAL HISTORIC TRAIL PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL SCENIC TRAIL A R I Z O N A N AT ION A L SCENIC TRAIL JU A N B A U TISTA DE ANZA NA TIO N A L H IS T O R IC TRAIL SANTA FE NATIONAL HISTORIC TRAIL MORMON PIONEER NATIONAL HISTORIC TRAIL L E W I S AND C L A R K N AT I O N A L H IS T O R IC T R A I L ICE AGE NATIONAL SCE N IC TRAIL TRAIL OF TEARS NATIONAL HISTORIC TRAIL OVERMOUNTAIN VICTORYNATIONAL HISTORIC TRAILSELMA TO MONTGOMERYNATIONAL HISTORIC TRAILNATCHEZ TRACE NATIONAL SCENIC TRAIL FLORIDA NATIONAL SCENIC TRAIL APPALACHIAN NATIONAL SCENIC TRAIL IDITAROD NATION A L H ISTORIC TRAIL NORTH COUNTRY NATIONAL SCENIC TRAIL POTOMAC HERITAGENATIONAL SCENIC TRAILNEW ENGLANDNATIONAL SCENIC TRAILWASHINGTON-ROCHAMBEAUREVOLUTIONARY ROUTENATIONAL HISTORIC TRAILSTAR-SPANGLED BANNERNATIONAL HISTORIC TRAILCAPTAIN JOHN SMITH CHESAPEAKENATIONAL HISTORIC TRAILALA KAHAKAI NATIONALHISTORIC TRAILCONTINENTAL DIVIDE NATIONAL SCENIC TRAIL EL CAMINO REAL DETIERRA ADENTRONATIONAL HISTORIC TRAILEL CAMINO REALDE LOS TEJASNATIONAL HISTORIC TRAILThe four trails shown here asseparate lines actually followthe same route in much ofNebraska and Wyoming. To Mexico CityTo Mexico CityTo central MexicoDesignated routeProposed relocation0 1000 100 200 Miles200 KilometersScale for all areas except Alaska00 400 Miles200200 400 KilometersNorthPage 76 of 323Site Location3.E.bPacket Pg. 359Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Page 77 of 323Site Location3.E.bPacket Pg. 360Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Page 78 of 323Site Location3.E.bPacket Pg. 361Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Page 79 of 323Site Location3.E.bPacket Pg. 362Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Page 80 of 323Site Location3.E.bPacket Pg. 363Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Page 81 of 323Site Location3.E.bPacket Pg. 364Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Page 82 of 323Site Location3.E.bPacket Pg. 365Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Page 83 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 366 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 84 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 367 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 85 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 368 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 86 of 323Site Location3.E.bPacket Pg. 369Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Page 87 of 3233.E.bPacket Pg. 370Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Page 88 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 371 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila Appendix B United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS): South Florida Ecologcial Services Field Office and Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) and Florida State Clearinghouse (FSC) Consultation Page 89 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 372 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila Lotis’ Informal Biological Assessment (IBA) Page 90 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 373 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) (716)580Ͳ7000www.thelotisgroup.comLotisEnvironmental,LLC8899MainStreet,Suite107 Williamsville,NY14221 Informal Biological Assessment Applicant: VB BTS, LLC Site Name: “Senor Tequila”; Site Number: “US-FL-7040”; Lotis Task ID: “VBBTS_010” Latitude : 26° 10' 55.91" N ; Longitude : -81° 41' 06.58" W Lotis was contracted by the applicant to complete an informal biological assessment (IBA) for the proposed undertaking (which includes the tower, associated equipment, lease area, and access/utility/guy wire easements; or a combination of the mentioned). The purpose of this IBA is to assess and document whether the proposed undertaking will potentially affect species of concern, designated critical habitats, wetlands, and migratory birds identified by the United States Fish and Wildlife Services (USFWS) Information for Planning and Conservation (IPaC) tool and the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC). The proposed undertaking’s scope of work (SOW), site photographs, site location maps, the official IPaC species list/Section 7 guidance, and the relevant species listed by the state of Florida are included in this report. The Proposed Undertaking’s Scope of Work: The proposed undertaking is located near 2560 39th Street SW, Naples, Collier County, Florida 34117 and consists of a 155-foot tall monopine telecommunication tower and associated equipment contained within a 70-foot by 70-foot lease area at the above property. The undertaking includes a 20-foot by 563-foot-long access easement that extends north then generally west connecting with 39th Street Southwest. Additionally, there is a 10-foot by 505-foot utility easement. In total the proposed undertaking is approximately 21,210 square feet. The proposed tower site is approximately 11.4 feet above mean sea level (AMSL). Site and Surrounding Habitat: The proposed undertaking is currently located in wooded land. Per the scope of work, no trees within the proposed undertaking are identified to be removed/impacted. The surrounding habitats within a 0.5 mile radius of the proposed undertaking consist of commercial and residential properties with associated roadways. To the north, habitat consists of a partially wooded lot followed by 25th Avenue Southwest, a large, wooded lot, a commercial property with surrounding trees, 23rd Avenue Southwest, a wooded lot, and a partially disturbed lot. To the east, habitat consists of disturbed lot followed by a large partially wooded lot, several residential properties with surrounding trees, and a large, forested area. To the south, habitat consists of a partially wooded lot followed by several residential properties with some trees, 27th Avenue Southwest, a couple residential properties with surrounding trees, a commercial property with surrounding trees, 29th Avenue Southwest, and a residential property with surrounding trees. To the west, habitat consists of a commercial property with some trees followed by 39th Street Southwest, a riverine, Collier Boulevard, and a large partially wooded golf course. Per USFWS Critical Habitat Mapper (http://fws.maps.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=9d8d e5e265ad4fe09893cf75b8ddbf77) the current habitat is not mapped as critical habitat, nor does it qualify as preferred habitat for Federal or State listed species. Wetlands: Lotis has reviewed the United States Geological Survey’s (USGS) topographic map as well as the USFWS National Wetlands Inventory Map (NWIM) to determine if the lease area and easements would have an impact on any wetlands. Lotis determined that the proposed undertaking is not located in a recognized national wetland area but due to the proximity of wetlands in all directions the undertaking may have an adverse effect on these areas. Lotis recommends best management practices be incorporated to protect adjacent habitats and wetlands from runoff caused by impervious surfaces. The closest USFWS identified wetland is approximately 0.05 miles southeast of the tower location. Lotis identified surface water bodies with the aid of local maps in combination with an area reconnaissance. Lotis has identified wetlands within a 0.50-mile radius and wetlands of significance. Please see the list of identified water bodies below: Page 91 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 374 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Site Name: Senor Tequila Site Number: US-FL-7040 (716)580Ͳ7000www.thelotisgroup.comLotisEnvironmental,LLC8899MainStreet,Suite107 Williamsville,NY14221 Water Body Type Water Body Name Direction from Tower Distance from Tower Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland Unnamed Southeast ~0.05 miles Riverine Unnamed West ~0.10 miles Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland Unnamed North ~0.10 miles Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland Unnamed Northeast ~0.18 miles Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland Unnamed Southeast ~0.22 miles Freshwater Pond Unnamed Southwest ~0.25 miles Freshwater Emergent Wetland Unnamed Southeast ~0.26 miles Freshwater Pond Unnamed Southwest ~0.27 miles Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland Unnamed Southeast ~0.35 miles Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland Unnamed Southeast ~0.37 miles Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland Unnamed Northeast ~0.41 miles Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland Unnamed Northeast ~0.43 miles Riverine Unnamed Northwest ~0.43 miles Freshwater Pond Unnamed Southwest ~0.43 miles Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland Unnamed Southeast ~0.46 miles Freshwater Pond Unnamed Southwest ~0.49 miles *All directions are from the closest point of contact from the tower location. Threatened or Endangered Species: Lotis has researched the threatened or endangered species and designated critical habitat for the action area. This is exclusive to any such species that have been reported to exist within the area where the proposed undertaking is located. The list of federally threatened or endangered species was acquired through the USFWS IPaC website. The list of state species of concern was acquired through the Florida’s Natural Areas Inventory website (https://data.labins.org/map ping/FNAI_BioMatrix/GridSearch.cfm?sel_id=41279&extent=630456.0547,242948.1689,632065.3977,244557.5118). The list of the remaining potentially present listed species and habitat presence are summarized in the following table: Species Name Federal /State Status Preferred Habitat Habitat Presence Recommendation of Effect American Alligator (Alligator mississippiensis) Federally Threatened Freshwater, slow-moving rivers Habitat assessment indicated no preferred habitat present. No effect Page 92 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 375 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Site Name: Senor Tequila Site Number: US-FL-7040 (716)580Ͳ7000www.thelotisgroup.comLotisEnvironmental,LLC8899MainStreet,Suite107 Williamsville,NY14221 Species Name Federal /State Status Preferred Habitat Habitat Presence Recommendation of Effect Audubon’s Crested Caracara (Polyborus plancus audubonni) Federally Threatened Wet prairies with cabbage palms Habitat assessment indicated no preferred habitat present. No effect Bartram’s Hairstreak Butterfly (Strymon acis bartrami) Federally Endangered Pine rockland habitat Habitat assessment indicated no preferred habitat present. No effect Big Cypress Fox Squirrel (Sciurus niger avicennia) State Threatened Cypress, slash pine savanna, mangrove swamps, tropical hardwood forests, live oak woods, coastal broadleaf evergreen hammocks, suburban habitats including golf courses, city parks, and residential areas Habitat assessment indicated no preferred habitat present. No effect Celestial Lily (Nemastylis floridana) State Endangered Glades, prairies, and rocky slopes on calcareous substrates Habitat assessment indicated no preferred habitat present. No effect Eastern Indigo Snake (Drymarchon couperi) Federally Threatened Pine flatwoods, hardwood forests, moist hammocks, and areas that surround cypress swamps Habitat assessment indicated no preferred habitat present. No effect Florida Beargrass (Nolina atopocarpa) State Threatened Dry upland communities Habitat assessment indicated no preferred habitat present. No effect Florida Bonneted Bat (Eumops floridanus) Federally Endangered Forests, wetlands, and other natural habitats Habitat assessment indicated no preferred habitat present. No effect Florida Burrowing Owl (Athene cunicularia floridana) State Threatened Open priaries Habitat assessment indicated no preferred habitat present. No effect Page 93 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 376 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Site Name: Senor Tequila Site Number: US-FL-7040 (716)580Ͳ7000www.thelotisgroup.comLotisEnvironmental,LLC8899MainStreet,Suite107 Williamsville,NY14221 Species Name Federal /State Status Preferred Habitat Habitat Presence Recommendation of Effect Florida Leafwing Butterfly (Anaea troglodyta floridalis) Federally Endangered Pine rockland Habitat assessment indicated no preferred habitat present. No effect Florida Panther (Puma concolor coryi) Federally Endangered Forests, wetlands, and grasslands Habitat assessment indicated no preferred habitat present. No effect Florida Prairie-clover (Dalea carthagenesis floridana) Federally Endangered Pine rocklands, edges of rockland hammocks, coastal uplands, marl prairie Habitat assessment indicated no preferred habitat present. No effect Florida Royal Palm (Roystonea regia) State Endangered Tropical rockland hammock, Everglades tree islands Habitat assessment indicated no preferred habitat present. No effect Garber’s Spurge (Chamaesyce garberi) Federally Threatened Sandy soils over limestone in pine rocklands, hammock edges, coastal rock barrens, grass prairies, salt flats, beach ridges, and swales Habitat assessment indicated no preferred habitat present. No effect Ghost Orchid (Dendrophylax lindenii) State Endangered Deep swamps of cypress, pond apple and palm trees Habitat assessment indicated no preferred habitat present. No effect Gopher Tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) State Threatened Well-drained, sandy soils Habitat assessment indicated no preferred habitat present. No effect Gulf Sturgeon (Acipenser oxyrinchus desotoi) Federally Threatened Riverine habitat between the upstream spawning areas and the estuary Habitat assessment indicated no preferred habitat present. No effect Page 94 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 377 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Site Name: Senor Tequila Site Number: US-FL-7040 (716)580Ͳ7000www.thelotisgroup.comLotisEnvironmental,LLC8899MainStreet,Suite107 Williamsville,NY14221 Species Name Federal /State Status Preferred Habitat Habitat Presence Recommendation of Effect Loggerhead Sea Turtle (Caretta caretta) Federally Threatened Subtropical and temperate regions Habitat assessment indicated no preferred habitat present. No effect Miami Blue Butterfly (Cyclargus thomasi bethunebakeri) Federally Endangered Tropical hardwood hammocks, tropical pine rocklands, and beachside scrub Habitat assessment indicated no preferred habitat present. No effect Monarch Butterfly (Danaus plexippus) Federal Candidate Prairies, meadows, grasslands and along roadsides Habitat assessment indicated no preferred habitat present. No effect Nodding Pinweed (Lechea cernua) State Threatened Dry sandy areas, sand pine scrub, scrub, dunes and sandy ridges Habitat assessment indicated no preferred habitat present. No effect Pinewoods Bluestem (Andropogon arctatus) State Threatened Flatwoods, bogs, and scrubland Habitat assessment indicated no preferred habitat present. No effect Puma (Puma concolor) Federally Threatened Desert scrub, chaparral, swamps, and forests Habitat assessment indicated no preferred habitat present. No effect Red-cockaded Woodpecker (Picoides borealis) Federally Endangered Old pines with very little understory Habitat assessment indicated no preferred habitat present. No effect Small’s Flax (Linum carteri var. smallii) State Endangered Pine rockland Habitat assessment indicated no preferred habitat present. No effect Page 95 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 378 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Site Name: Senor Tequila Site Number: US-FL-7040 (716)580Ͳ7000www.thelotisgroup.comLotisEnvironmental,LLC8899MainStreet,Suite107 Williamsville,NY14221 Species Name Federal /State Status Preferred Habitat Habitat Presence Recommendation of Effect Wood Stork (Mycteria americana) Federally Threatened Mixed hardwood swamps, sloughs, mangroves, and cypress domes/strands Habitat assessment indicated no preferred habitat present. No effect Migratory Birds: The USFWS has indicated its concern of the impact of towers on migrating bird populations. The proposed undertaking and design process for this undertaking could not conform to all the USFWS recommendations to decrease potential effects on migratory birds. Lotis has assessed the potential habitat for migratory birds and has determined that potential habitat is present at and around the proposed undertaking. This habitat includes wooded lands in the surrounding area. The siting of this proposed undertaking has placed it within disturbed habitat. It should also be noted that the proposed undertaking is located within 0.58 miles of an existing 162-foot guyed telecommunication tower to the southwest. Based upon the efforts during this IBA as well as the current data made available, surrounding habitat has the potential to support migratory birds; however, potential negative effects of the a nearby tower are unknown and addition of another tower may or may not negatively affect migratory birds. Conclusions: In conclusion, no species preferred habitats, identified by the USFWS and the FWC have been observed at the proposed undertaking’s location. Therefore, based on the documents reviewed, and the SOW outlined above, identified threatened/endangered species will not be affected by the proposed undertaking. Lotis’ recommends following all preventative recommendations presented by the USFWS and the FWC. It should be noted that this informal biological assessment was conducted in accordance with the Scope of Work and does not constitute a Section 7 Biological Assessment under the Endangered Species Act (50 CFR Part 402.01). Miles Walz-Salvador Biologist / Nationwide NEPA Manager Lotis Environmental, LLC Page 96 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 379 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS): South Florida Ecologcial Services Field Office Submission Note: In the interest of efficiency and economy, attachments included in the original submission under this section are not duplicated throughout this NEPA Summary. The following attachment(s), found at the conclusion of this report, were included in the original submission: • Proposed Project Summary • Informal Biological Assessment • USFWS IPaC Document • Attachment 1 - Maps • Attachment 2 - Photographs Page 97 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 380 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) (716)580Ͳ7000www.thelotisgroup.comLotisEnvironmental,LLC8899MainStreet,Suite107 Williamsville,NY14221 June 3, 2022 United States Fish & Wildlife Service: South Florida Ecologcial Services Field Office Attn: John Wrublik 1339 20th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Submitted via email: verobeach@fws.gov; John_Wrublik@fws.gov RE: Proposed Telecommunications Tower Undertaking “Senor Tequila” in Collier County, Florida; VB BTS, LLC To Whom It May Concern: VB BTS, LLC (VB BTS), is proposing to construct a tower installation within the general vicinity of near 2560 39th Street Southwest, Naples, Collier County, Florida 34117. Lotis Environmental, LLC (Lotis), is preparing an environmental review on behalf of VB BTS as part of its permit process and regulatory review by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Lotis’ review is focused on compliance with Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act and environmental concerns specified by the FCC in 47 CFR 1.1307. In addition, Lotis will be considering the possible impact on wetlands, critical habitat, wildlife refuges, wilderness areas, state listed species of concern, as well as species protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the Bald and Golden Eagle Act. Consultation with the state will also be initiated to mitigate potential impact to species of concern. Attached, please find information pertaining to the proposed undertaking known as Senor Tequila. The information package includes the proposed project summary, site maps, results from our search of threatened or endangered species within the action area (provided by the IPaC website) and the state species list (divided into Quad) and site photographs of the proposed undertaking and adjacent habitat. Lotis has completed an informal biological assessment of the proposed undertaking’s action area using available maps, documentation, and site reconnaissance. We have determined that the proposed undertaking would have No Effect on federal listed species, their designated habitat, or designated critical habitat. We would appreciate your assistance in determining if, in your opinion, the proposed undertaking is found to affect a wildlife refuge or will have an adverse impact on any listed and/or proposed species of concern or any designated and/or proposed critical habitats. We request your concurrence with our determination of No Effect on federally listed species. Page 98 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 381 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) (716)580Ͳ7000www.thelotisgroup.comLotisEnvironmental,LLC8899MainStreet,Suite107 Williamsville,NY14221 On behalf of VB BTS, I would solicit your comments on this proposed undertaking. Kindly forward to the undersigned via email (NEPA.NHPA@TheLotisGroup.com) or by regular mail to 6465 Transit Road - Suite 21, East Amherst, NY 14051-2232. Thank you for your consideration and cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, Lotis Environmental, LLC Miles Walz-Salvador Nationwide NEPA/NHPA Manager NEPA.NHPA@TheLotisGroup.com Enclosures Page 99 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 382 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Designation Letter for FCC licensees, applicants, tower companies and their representatives when they request informal consultations and/or request species lists pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. Â§Â§ 1531-1543) (ESA) Page 100 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 383 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila Page 101 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 384 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila Page 102 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 385 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS): South Florida Ecologcial Services Field Office’s Information for Planning and Conservation (IPaC) Letter(s) Page 103 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 386 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 104 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 387 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 105 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 388 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 106 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 389 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 107 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 390 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 108 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 391 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 109 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 392 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 110 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 393 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 111 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 394 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 112 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 395 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 113 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 396 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 114 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 397 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 115 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 398 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 116 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 399 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 117 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 400 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 118 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 401 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 119 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 402 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 120 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 403 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 121 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 404 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 122 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 405 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 123 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 406 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 124 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 407 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 125 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 408 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 126 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 409 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 127 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 410 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 128 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 411 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 129 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 412 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 130 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 413 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 131 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 414 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 132 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 415 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 133 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 416 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 134 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 417 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 135 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 418 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 136 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 419 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 137 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 420 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 138 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 421 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS): South Florida Ecologcial Services Field Office’s Categorical Clearance Statement Page 139 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 422 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - South Region (FWC) Submission Note: In the interest of efficiency and economy, attachments included in the original submission under this section are not duplicated throughout this NEPA Summary. The following attachment(s), found at the conclusion of this report, were included in the original submission: • Proposed Project Summary • Informal Biological Assessment • State Species List (if applicable) • Attachment 1 - Maps • Attachment 2 - Photographs Page 140 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 423 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) (716)580Ͳ7000www.thelotisgroup.comLotisEnvironmental,LLC8899MainStreet,Suite107 Williamsville,NY14221 June 3, 2022 Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - South Region Attn: Thomas Reinert 8535 Northlake Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33412 Submitted via email: fwcconservationplanningservices@myfwc.com RE: Proposed Telecommunications Tower Undertaking “Senor Tequila” in Collier County, Florida; VB BTS, LLC To Whom It May Concern: VB BTS, LLC (VB BTS), is proposing to construct a tower installation within the general vicinity of near 2560 39th Street Southwest, Naples, Collier County, Florida 34117. Lotis Environmental, LLC (Lotis) is preparing an environmental review on behalf of VB BTS as part of its permit process and regulatory review by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Lotis’ review is focused on compliance with Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act and environmental concerns specified by the FCC in 47 CFR 1.1307. The environmental review will include the consideration of possible impact on wetlands, critical habitat, wildlife refuges, wilderness areas, state, and federal listed species of concern, as well as species protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the Bald and Golden Eagle Act. Consultation with the USFWS will also be initiated to mitigate potential impact on species of concern. Attached, please find information pertaining to the proposed undertaking known as Senor Tequila. The information package includes the proposed project summary, site maps, results from our search of threatened or endangered species within the action area (provided by the IPaC website) and the state species list (divided into Quad) and site photographs of the proposed undertaking and adjacent habitat. Lotis has completed an informal biological assessment of the proposed undertaking’s action area using available maps, documentation, and site reconnaissance. We have determined that the proposed undertaking would have No Effect on state listed species or their potential habitat. We would appreciate your assistance in determining if, in your opinion, the proposed undertaking is found to have an adverse impact on any listed and/or proposed species of concern or any designated Page 141 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 424 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) (716)580Ͳ7000www.thelotisgroup.comLotisEnvironmental,LLC8899MainStreet,Suite107 Williamsville,NY14221 and/or proposed critical habitats. Additionally, we request your concurrence with our determination of No Effect on state listed species. On behalf of VB BTS, I would solicit your comments on this proposed undertaking. Kindly forward to the undersigned via email (NEPA.NHPA@TheLotisGroup.com) or by regular mail to 6465 Transit Road - Suite 21, East Amherst, NY 14051-2232. Thank you for your consideration and cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, Lotis Environmental, LLC Miles Walz-Salvador Nationwide NEPA/NHPA Manager NEPA.NHPA@TheLotisGroup.com Enclosures Page 142 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 425 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila Proof of Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) Submission Page 143 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 426 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - South Region (FWC) Threatened and Endangered Species List Page 144 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 427 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - South Region’s (FWC) Categorical Clearance Statement Page 145 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 428 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila Florida State Clearinghouse (FSC) Submission Note: In the interest of efficiency and economy, attachments included in the original submission under this section are not duplicated throughout this NEPA Summary. The following attachment(s), found at the conclusion of this report, were included in the original submission: • Proposed Project Summary • Informal Biological Assessment •USFWS IPaC Document •State Species List •USFWS and FWC Submission Cover Letter •SHPO Submission Cover Letter •Form 620 •Attachment 1 - 9 Page 146 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 429 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) (716)580Ͳ7000www.thelotisgroup.comLotisEnvironmental,LLC8899MainStreet,Suite107 Williamsville,NY14221 June 3, 2022 Florida Department of Environmental Protection: Florida State Clearinghouse Attn: Mr. Chris Stahl, Coordinator 3800 Commonwealth Boulevard, M.S. 47 Tallahassee, FL 32399-2400 Email: State.Clearinghouse@floridadep.gov RE: Proposed Telecommunications Tower Undertaking “Senor Tequila” in Collier County, Florida; VB BTS, LLC To Whom It May Concern: VB BTS, LLC (VB BTS), is proposing to construct a tower installation within the general vicinity of near 2560 39th Street Southwest, Naples, Collier, Florida 34117. Lotis Environmental, LLC (Lotis) is preparing an environmental review on behalf of VB BTS as part of its permit process and regulatory review by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Attached, please find information pertaining to the proposed undertaking known as Senor Tequila. We would appreciate your assistance in determining if, in your opinion, the proposed undertaking is found to have an adverse impact on any listed and/or proposed species of concern or any designated. On behalf of VB BTS, I would solicit your comments on this proposed undertaking. Kindly forward to the undersigned via email (NEPA.NHPA@TheLotisGroup.com) or by regular mail to 6465 Transit Road - Suite 21, East Amherst, NY 14051-2232. Thank you for your consideration and cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, Lotis Environmental, LLC Miles Walz-Salvador Nationwide NEPA/NHPA Manager NEPA.NHPA@TheLotisGroup.com Enclosures Page 147 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 430 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila Proof of Florida State Clearinghouse (FSC) Submission Page 148 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 431 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila Florida State Clearinghouse (FSC) Response Page 149 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 432 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila 2013 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Revised Voluntary Guidelines for Communication Tower Design, Siting, Construction, Operation, Retrofitting, and Decommissioning Page 150 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 433 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918 Page 151 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 434 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila 2007 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) National Bald Eagle Guidelines Page 152 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 435 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila Appendix C Division of Historical Resources (DHR) Consultation Page 153 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 436 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila Division of Historical Resources (DHR) Submission Note: In the interest of efficiency and economy, attachments included in the original submission under this section are not duplicated throughout this NEPA Summary. The following attachment(s), found at the conclusion of this report, were included in the original submission: • Proposed Project Summary • Form 620/621 • Attachment 1 - Maps • Attachment 2 - Photographs • Attachment 3 - Areas of Potential Effects (Cultural Resource Report) • Attachment 4 - Historic Properties Identified in the APE for Direct Effects • Attachment 5 - Historic Properties Identified in the APE for Visual Effects • Attachment 6 - Tribal/NHO Involvement • Attachment 7 - Local Government Involvement • Attachment 8 - Public Involvement • Attachment 9 - Curricula Vitae • Attachment 10 - SHPO Specific Documentation (If required) Page 154 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 437 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) (716)580Ͳ7000www.thelotisgroup.comLotisEnvironmental,LLC8899MainStreet,Suite107 Williamsville,NY14221 June 3, 2022 Division of Historical Resources Attn: Alayna Gould 500 South Bronough Street R.A. Gray Building, Room 305 Tallahassee, Florida 32399 RE:Proposed Telecommunications Tower Undertaking “Senor Tequila” in Collier County, Florida, VB BTS, LLC; TCNS #: 248897 To Whom It May Concern: VB BTS, LLC (VB BTS), is proposing to construct a tower installation and associated equipment within the general vicinity of near 2560 39th Street Southwest, Naples, Collier County, Florida 34117. Lotis Environmental, LLC (Lotis), is preparing a cultural resource and environmental review on behalf of VB BTS as part of its permit process and regulatory review by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Please consider this correspondence an invitation to the DHR to comment on the possible direct or visual effects the proposed undertaking may have on eligible/listed sites or structures of historic significance within the Area of Potential Effect (APE). By providing your signature or stamp of approval, you concur with Lotis’ recommendation finding of No Historic Properties on eligible/listed sites or structures of historic significance within the APE. Attached, please find the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) completed Form 620 and corresponding attachments for the proposed undertaking. Should you require further information, please do not hesitate to contact me at (716) 580-7000 or NEPA.NHPA@TheLotisGroup.com. Thank you for your time and consideration in these regards. Sincerely, Lotis Environmental, LLC Miles Walz-Salvador Nationwide NEPA/NHPA Manager NEPA.NHPA@TheLotisGroup.com Enclosures Page 155 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 438 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila Advisory Council On Historic Preservation (ACHP) Delegation of Authority for the Section 106 Review of Telecommunication Projects Page 156 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 439 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila Page 157 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 440 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila Page 158 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 441 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila Proof of Division of Historical Resources (DHR) Submission Page 159 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 442 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila Division of Historical Resources’s (DHR) Response Page 160 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 443 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Form 620 Page 161 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 444 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila Electronic Section 106 (E-106) Submission Confirmation Email Page 162 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 445 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila Appendix D Tribal/NHO Consultation(s) Page 163 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 446 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Federal Recognized Tribal/NHO Correspondence Summary Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila Tribe/NHO First Tribal Contact Second Tribal Contact Tribal Clearance Date Referred to FCC Response Outcome 1 Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida 5/10/2022 N/A 6/10/2022 N/AIf the applicant/tower builder receives no response from the Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida within 30 days after notification through TCNS, the Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida has no interest in participating in pre-construction review for the proposed site 2 Seminole Tribe of Florida 5/10/2022 6/3/2022 8/12/2022 7/28/2022 Per the FCC referral, Consultation is complete 3 Seminole Nation of Oklahoma 5/10/2022 N/A 6/10/2022 N/AIf the applicant/tower builder receives no response from the Seminole Nation of Oklahoma within 30 days after notification through TCNS, the Seminole Nation of Oklahoma has no interest in participating in preconstruction review for the proposed site 4 Muscogee (Creek) Nation 5/10/2022 6/3/2022 6/28/2022 N/ACollier County is outside of the Muscogee (Creek) Nation historic area of interest. We respectfully defer to the other Tribes that have been contacted 5 Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma 5/10/2022 N/A 5/18/2022 N/A No Adverse Effect6 Thlopthlocco Tribal Town 5/10/2022 6/3/2022 8/12/2022 7/28/2022 Per the FCC referral, Consultation is complete The Applicant/tower builder, however, must immediately notify all tribal consulting parties in the event archaeological properties or human remains are discovered during construction, consistent with Section IX of the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement and applicable law. * Denotes tribe had indicated through TCNS that if no response had been received within 30 days that the tribe had no interest in the project. No response was received by Lotis within the required 30 days; therefore Section 106 review is complete for this tribe. Notes:1. First Tribal contact was made through the FCC’s TCNS system. Page 164 of 3233.E.bPacket Pg. 447Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila Tribal/NHO Submission(s) Note: In the interest of efficiency and economy, attachments included in the original submission under this section are not duplicated throughout this NEPA Summary. The following attachment(s), found at the conclusion of this report, were included in the original submission: • Proposed Project Summary • Attachment 1 - Maps • Attachment 2 - Photographs • Attachment 3 - Cultural Resource Report • Form 620/621(if requested) • SHPO Response (if requested) Page 165 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 448 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) (716)580Ͳ7000www.thelotisgroup.comLotisEnvironmental,LLC8899MainStreet,Suite107 Williamsville,NY14221 June 3, 2022 Seminole Tribe of Florida 30290 Josie Billie Hwy Clewiston, Florida Submitted via email: THPOCompliance@semtribe.com RE: Proposed Telecommunications Tower Undertaking “Senor Tequila” in Collier County, Florida; VB BTS, LLC; TCNS #: 248897 To Whom It May Concern: VB BTS, LLC (VB BTS), is proposing to construct a tower installation within the general vicinity of near 2560 39th Street Southwest, Naples, Collier County, Florida 34117. Lotis Environmental, LLC (Lotis) has prepared an environmental and cultural resource review on behalf of VB BTS as part of its permit process and regulatory review by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Please consider this correspondence a response to the request for additional information about the proposed undertaking (through the Federal Communication Commission’s Tower Construction Notification System – TCNS # 248897). Lotis is providing you the opportunity to review and comment on the possible effects the proposed undertaking may have on sites or structures of current or historical significance affiliated with your tribe. Should you identify an area/property which will be adversely impacted, please submit this information to us at the time of your response so that we may determine our client’s options on how to proceed. To aid you in your review please see the proposed undertaking’s information is as follows: Attached (or Enclosed), please find the requested materials which include site photographs taken in all four directions (north, south, east, and west) from the center of the proposed undertaking, a project summary, an aerial photograph, a topographic map, and form 620 (if requested). Lotis contracted Subterranean Consultants to perform an archeological assessment of the proposed undertaking to determine whether or not it would have an effect on historic properties within the direct or visual area of potential effect (APE). Subterranean Consultants conducted site reconnaissance, per SHPO and tribal protocols, and did not locate archaeological sites or historic properties within the APE. Subterranean Consultants have recommended that the proposed undertaking be allowed to proceed as planned without further survey. A copy of the cultural resource report and other requested documentation is included for your review. Page 166 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 449 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila As part of our research, Lotis has or will shortly be consulting with the Division of Historical Resources (through FCC’s E- 106 filing protocols), as well as other Native American tribes. If you have requested the SHPO’s response to be sent with the review materials, Lotis will forward the letter once it has been received. Per the FCC Second Report and Order, released on March 30, 2018, and implemented on July 2, 2018, “… we clarify that applicants have no legal obligation to pay up-front fees when providing Tribal Nations and NHOs with an opportunity to comment on proposed facilities deployments”. Please note, this letter is not a request for review but an invitation giving the tribe the opportunity to review impact to affiliated areas/properties within the APE. Therefore, per the applicant’s request, Lotis will not be submitting any requested upfront review fees in exchange for review or comment of the proposed undertaking and will be following the FCC protocols for Section 106 consultation with Tribal Nations and NHOs. Lotis apologizes for any inconvenience this may cause. Should you require further information, please do not hesitate to contact me by calling (716) 580-7000 or by email at NEPA.NHPA@TheLotisGroup.com. Thank you for your time and consideration in this regard. Sincerely, Lotis Environmental, LLC Miles Walz-Salvador Nationwide NEPA/NHPA Manager NEPA.NHPA@TheLotisGroup.com Enclosures Page 167 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 450 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) (716)580Ͳ7000www.thelotisgroup.comLotisEnvironmental,LLC8899MainStreet,Suite107 Williamsville,NY14221 June 3, 2022 Muscogee (Creek) Nation Attn: TCNS Coordinator Anne Edwards-Martel PO Box: 580 Okmulgee, OK 74447 RE: Proposed Telecommunications Tower Undertaking “Senor Tequila” in Collier County, Florida; VB BTS, LLC; TCNS #: 248897 To Whom It May Concern: VB BTS, LLC (VB BTS), is proposing to construct a tower installation within the general vicinity of near 2560 39th Street Southwest, Naples, Collier County, Florida 34117. Lotis Environmental, LLC (Lotis) has prepared an environmental and cultural resource review on behalf of VB BTS as part of its permit process and regulatory review by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Please consider this correspondence a response to the request for additional information about the proposed undertaking (through the Federal Communication Commission’s Tower Construction Notification System – TCNS # 248897). Lotis is providing you the opportunity to review and comment on the possible effects the proposed undertaking may have on sites or structures of current or historical significance affiliated with your tribe. Should you identify an area/property which will be adversely impacted, please submit this information to us at the time of your response so that we may determine our client’s options on how to proceed. To aid you in your review please see the proposed undertaking’s information is as follows: Attached (or Enclosed), please find the requested materials which include site photographs taken in all four directions (north, south, east, and west) from the center of the proposed undertaking, a project summary, an aerial photograph, a topographic map, and form 620 (if requested). Lotis contracted Subterranean Consultants to perform an archeological assessment of the proposed undertaking to determine whether or not it would have an effect on historic properties within the direct or visual area of potential effect (APE). Subterranean Consultants conducted site reconnaissance, per SHPO and tribal protocols, and did not locate archaeological sites or historic properties within the APE. Subterranean Consultants have recommended that the proposed undertaking be allowed to proceed as planned without further survey. A copy of the cultural resource report and other requested documentation is included for your review. Page 168 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 451 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila As part of our research, Lotis has or will shortly be consulting with the Division of Historical Resources (through FCC’s E- 106 filing protocols), as well as other Native American tribes. If you have requested the SHPO’s response to be sent with the review materials, Lotis will forward the letter once it has been received. Per the FCC Second Report and Order, released on March 30, 2018, and implemented on July 2, 2018, “… we clarify that applicants have no legal obligation to pay up-front fees when providing Tribal Nations and NHOs with an opportunity to comment on proposed facilities deployments”. Please note, this letter is not a request for review but an invitation giving the tribe the opportunity to review impact to affiliated areas/properties within the APE. Therefore, per the applicant’s request, Lotis will not be submitting any requested upfront review fees in exchange for review or comment of the proposed undertaking and will be following the FCC protocols for Section 106 consultation with Tribal Nations and NHOs. Lotis apologizes for any inconvenience this may cause. Should you require further information, please do not hesitate to contact me by calling (716) 580-7000 or by email at NEPA.NHPA@TheLotisGroup.com. Thank you for your time and consideration in this regard. Sincerely, Lotis Environmental, LLC Miles Walz-Salvador Nationwide NEPA/NHPA Manager NEPA.NHPA@TheLotisGroup.com Enclosures Page 169 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 452 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) (716)580Ͳ7000www.thelotisgroup.comLotisEnvironmental,LLC8899MainStreet,Suite107 Williamsville,NY14221 June 3, 2022 Thlopthlocco Tribal Town Attn: Mekko Ryan Morrow P.O. Box 188 Okemah, OK 74801 Submitted via email: thpo@tttown.org RE: Proposed Telecommunications Tower Undertaking “Senor Tequila” in Collier County, Florida; VB BTS, LLC; TCNS #: 248897 To Whom It May Concern: VB BTS, LLC (VB BTS), is proposing to construct a tower installation within the general vicinity of near 2560 39th Street Southwest, Naples, Collier County, Florida 34117. Lotis Environmental, LLC (Lotis) has prepared an environmental and cultural resource review on behalf of VB BTS as part of its permit process and regulatory review by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Please consider this correspondence a response to the request for additional information about the proposed undertaking (through the Federal Communication Commission’s Tower Construction Notification System – TCNS # 248897). Lotis is providing you the opportunity to review and comment on the possible effects the proposed undertaking may have on sites or structures of current or historical significance affiliated with your tribe. Should you identify an area/property which will be adversely impacted, please submit this information to us at the time of your response so that we may determine our client’s options on how to proceed. To aid you in your review please see the proposed undertaking’s information is as follows: Attached (or Enclosed), please find the requested materials which include site photographs taken in all four directions (north, south, east, and west) from the center of the proposed undertaking, a project summary, an aerial photograph, a topographic map, and form 620 (if requested). Lotis contracted Subterranean Consultants to perform an archeological assessment of the proposed undertaking to determine whether or not it would have an effect on historic properties within the direct or visual area of potential effect (APE). Subterranean Consultants conducted site reconnaissance, per SHPO and tribal protocols, and did not locate archaeological sites or historic properties within the APE. Subterranean Consultants have recommended that the proposed undertaking be allowed to proceed as planned without further survey. A copy of the cultural resource report and other requested documentation is included for your review. Page 170 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 453 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) (716)580Ͳ7000www.thelotisgroup.comLotisEnvironmental,LLC8899MainStreet,Suite107 Williamsville,NY14221 As part of our research, Lotis has or will shortly be consulting with the Division of Historical Resources (through FCC’s E- 106 filing protocols), as well as other Native American tribes. If you have requested the SHPO’s response to be sent with the review materials, Lotis will forward the letter once it has been received. Per the FCC Second Report and Order, released on March 30, 2018, and implemented on July 2, 2018, “… we clarify that applicants have no legal obligation to pay up-front fees when providing Tribal Nations and NHOs with an opportunity to comment on proposed facilities deployments”. Please note, this letter is not a request for review but an invitation giving the tribe the opportunity to review impact to affiliated areas/properties within the APE. Therefore, per the applicant’s request, Lotis will not be submitting any requested upfront review fees in exchange for review or comment of the proposed undertaking and will be following the FCC protocols for Section 106 consultation with Tribal Nations and NHOs. Lotis apologizes for any inconvenience this may cause. Should you require further information, please do not hesitate to contact me by calling (716) 580-7000 or by email at NEPA.NHPA@TheLotisGroup.com. Thank you for your time and consideration in this regard. Sincerely, Lotis Environmental, LLC Miles Walz-Salvador Nationwide NEPA/NHPA Manager NEPA.NHPA@TheLotisGroup.com Enclosures Page 171 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 454 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila Proof of Tribal/NHO Submission’s Page 172 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 455 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila Tribal/NHO Response(s) Page 173 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 456 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila Appendix E Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRMette) & other Mapping/Images Page 174 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 457 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 175 of 323Site Location3.E.bPacket Pg. 458Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila FAA Tower Certification Letter Page 176 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 459 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 177 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 460 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotic Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila Appendix F United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) National Wetland Inventory Map (NWIM) Page 178 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 461 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 179 of 323Site Location3.E.bPacket Pg. 462Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila PROPOSED PROJECT SUMMARY Site Name: Senor Tequila Site Address: near 2560 39th Street Southwest Naples, Florida 34117 Latitude/Longitude: 26° 10’ 55.91” ±N / -81° 41’ 06.58” ±W County: Collier County UTM: Zone: 17R East: 431535 North: 2896041 Legal Description: Township: 49S, Range: 26E, Section: 026 Consultant Information: Company: Lotis Environmental, LLC (Lotis) Consultant: Miles Walz-Salvador Email: NEPA.NHPA@TheLotisGroup.com Address: 6465 Transit Road – Suite 21 East Amherst, New York 14051-2232 Phone: (716) 580-7000 Project Description: Proposed construction of a 145’ (155’ including all appurtenances) monopine telecommunication tower within a 70’ by 70’ lease area. A proposed 20’ by 563’ access easement will extend north then generally west connecting with 39th Street Southwest. Additionally, a proposed 10’ by 505’ utility easement will extend south then west connecting with 39th Street Southwest. Project Impacts: Excavation and grade work to install tower foundation, utilities, and access easements. Project Area: Square Footage: ~21,210 / Acres: ~0.4869146 Present Land Use: partially disturbed lot Past Land Use: partially disturbed lot Page 180 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 463 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila Attachment 1 Maps and Survey Page 181 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 464 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila Lease Area (Far) Lease Area (Close) Aerial Images – Vicinity Maps VB BTS, LLC Senor Tequila near 2560 39th Street Southwest Naples, Collier County, Florida 34117 Photographed 2021 Access/Utility Easement(s) Page 182 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 465 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map VB BTS, LLC Senor Tequila near 2560 39th Street Southwest Naples, Collier County, Florida 34117 Provisional Edition 2021 Page 183 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 466 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 184 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 467 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 185 of 3233.E.bPacket Pg. 468Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Page 186 of 3233.E.bPacket Pg. 469Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Page 187 of 3233.E.bPacket Pg. 470Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Page 188 of 3233.E.bPacket Pg. 471Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila Attachment 2 Site Photographs Page 189 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 472 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila Site Photograph 1 – Looking north toward the proposed undertaking Site Photograph 2 – Looking north away from the proposed undertaking Site Photographs VB BTS, LLC – Senor Tequila near 2560 39th Street Southwest Naples, Collier County, Florida 34117 Photographed: May 27, 2022 Page 190 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 473 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila Site Photograph 3 – Looking east toward the proposed undertaking Site Photograph 4 – Looking east away from the proposed undertaking Site Photographs VB BTS, LLC – Senor Tequila near 2560 39th Street Southwest Naples, Collier County, Florida 34117 Photographed: May 27, 2022 Page 191 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 474 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila Site Photograph 5 – Looking south toward the proposed undertaking Site Photograph 6 – Looking south away from the proposed undertaking Site Photographs VB BTS, LLC – Senor Tequila near 2560 39th Street Southwest Naples, Collier County, Florida 34117 Photographed: May 27, 2022 Page 192 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 475 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila Site Photograph 7 – Looking west toward the proposed undertaking Site Photograph 8 – Looking west away from the proposed undertaking Site Photographs VB BTS, LLC – Senor Tequila near 2560 39th Street Southwest Naples, Collier County, Florida 34117 Photographed: May 27, 2022 Page 193 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 476 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila Site Photograph 9 – Looking south along the proposed access/utility easement Site Photograph 10 – Looking west along the proposed access/utility easement Site Photographs VB BTS, LLC – Senor Tequila near 2560 39th Street Southwest Naples, Collier County, Florida 34117 Photographed: May 27, 2022 Page 194 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 477 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila Site Photograph 11– Looking east along the proposed utility easement Site Photograph 12 – Looking west along the proposed utility easement Site Photographs VB BTS, LLC – Senor Tequila near 2560 39th Street Southwest Naples, Collier County, Florida 34117 Photographed: May 27, 2022 Page 195 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 478 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila Site Photograph 13 – General view of the proposed undertaking Site Photographs VB BTS, LLC – Senor Tequila near 2560 39th Street Southwest Naples, Collier County, Florida 34117 Photographed: May 27, 2022 Page 196 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 479 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila Attachment 3 Areas of Potential Effect (APE) Page 197 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 480 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila Areas of Potential Effects The term Area of Potential Effects (APE) is defined in Section II.A.3 of the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement (NPA) for Review of Effects on Historic Properties for Certain Undertakings Approved by the Federal Communications Commission. For purposes of this project, the APE for direct effects and visual effects are further defined below. Selection of APE for DIRECT EFFECTS The DIRECT area of potential effect is defined as being “limited to the area of potential ground disturbance and any property, or any portion thereof that will be physically altered or destroyed by the Undertaking.” Proposed Lease Area(s) – A 70’ x 70’ lease area around the 145’ (155’ including all appurtenances)’ monopine tower and associated equipment. Proposed Access Easement(s) – A 20-foot wide by approximately 563-foot-long easement extending generally north then generally west from the proposed lease area connecting with 39th Street Southwest through a partially disturbed lot. Proposed Utility Easement(s) – A 10-foot wide by approximately 505-foot-long easement extending generally south then west from the proposed lease area connecting with 39th Street Southwest through a partially disturbed lot. Selection of APE for VISUAL EFFECTS The VISUAL area of potential effects is defined as “the geographic area in which the undertaking has the potential to introduce visual elements that diminish or alter the setting, including the landscape, where the setting is a character-defining feature of a Historic Property that makes it eligible for listing on the National Register.” APE for this site based on NPA - Within ½-mile radius from the tower site if the proposed tower is less than 200’ in overall height. Page 198 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 481 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) SubTerranean Consultants Cultural Resource Assessment of the Proposed US-FL-7040 Senior Tequila Telecommunications Facility in Naples &ROOLHU&RXQW\)ORULGD May 2022 Page 199 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 482 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Cultural Resource Assessment of the Proposed US-FL-7040 Senior Tequila Telecommunications Facility in Naples &ROOLHU &RXQW\ )ORULGD 0D\ 3UHSDUHGE\ %LOO\-0F&DUOH\ 6XEWHUUDQHDQ&RQVXOWDQWV $WODQWD&RORUDGR6SULQJV 3UHSDUHGIRU 5RZ6WDU//& 3DUNRI&RPPHUFH'ULYH6XLWH %RFD5DWRQ)ORULGD 7KURXJKWKH)LUPRI 7KH/RWLV*URXS 7UDQVLW5RDG6XLWH (DVW$PKHUVW1< /HDG$JHQF\ )HGHUDO&RPPXQLFDWLRQV&RPPLVVLRQ)&& %LOO\-0F&DUOH\0$53$ 3ULQFLSDO,QYHVWLJDWRU %LOO\-0F&DUOH\0$53$ Page 200 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 483 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Cultural Resource Assessment of the Proposed US-FL-7040 Senior Tequila Telecommunications Facility in Naples, Collier County, Florida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iterature Review:5HYLHZRIWKH)ORULGD0DVWHU6LWH)LOHUHFRUGVUHYHDOHGWKDWWKHUHDUHQRSUHYLRXVO\ UHFRUGHGDUFKDHRORJLFDOVLWHVZLWKLQNPPLRIWKHFXUUHQWSURMHFWDUHD7KHUHDUHQRHOLJLEOHRUOLVWHG SUHYLRXVO\UHFRUGHGDUFKLWHFWXUDOUHVRXUFHVZLWKLQPL Field Survey:7KHUHZHUHQRFXOWXUDOPDWHULDOVLHFXOWXUDOO\PRGLILHGDUWLIDFWVFXOWXUDOGHSRVLWVIHDWXUHV RUKXPDQUHPDLQVRUDUFKLWHFWXUDOVWUXFWXUHVORFDWHGZLWKLQWKHGLUHFWRULQGLUHFWHIIHFWV$3(V Recommendations:1R15+3HOLJLEOHRUOLVWHGUHVRXUFHVZLOOEHGLUHFWO\LPSDFWHGE\WKHSURSRVHG SURMHFW7KHUHIRUH67&UHFRPPHQGVDILQGLQJRINo Historic PropertiesZLWKLQWKHGLUHFWDQGLQGLUHFW $3(V Page 201 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 484 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Cultural Resource Assessment of the Proposed US-FL-7040 Senior Tequila Telecommunications Facility in Naples, Collier County, Florida LL 7$%/(2)&217(176 ,,1752'8&7,21 ,,(19,5210(17$/&217(;7 3K\VLRJUDSKLF3URYLQFH 6RLOV 9HJHWDWLRQ )DXQD ,,,0(7+2'2/2*< )LHOGZRUN /DERUDWRU\ 5HFRUGV5HYLHZ ,95(68/76 5HVHDUFK )LHOG $UFKDHRORJ\ 9&21&/86,21 5()(5(1&(6&,7(' $33(1',;$ 3URMHFW3ODQV $33(1',;% 3ULQFLSDO,QYHVWLJDWRU&9 Page 202 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 485 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Cultural Resource Assessment of the Proposed US-FL-7040 Senior Tequila Telecommunications Facility in Naples, Collier County, Florida LLL 7$%/(2)),*85(6 )LJXUH86*60LQXWH6HULHV%HOOH0HDGH1:)/SUWRSRJUDSKLFPDS GHSLFWLQJWKHSURMHFWYLFLQLW\DQGHQYLURQV )LJXUH'LUHFW$3(GHSLFWHGRQDQ(65,DHULDOSKRWRJUDSK )LJXUH3KRWRJUDSKRIGLUHFWHIIHFWV$3(IDFLQJQRUWKHDVW )LJXUH(65,DHULDOGHSLFWLQJSURMHFWDUHDDQGVKRYHOWHVWLQJVWUDWHJ\ Page 203 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 486 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Cultural Resource Assessment of the Proposed US-FL-7040 Senior Tequila Telecommunications Facility in Naples, Collier County, Florida 1 ,,1752'8&7,21 Project Name: 86)/6HQLRU7HTXLOD Project Type:5DZODQG/HDVH$FFHVVDQG7RZHU Lead Agency: )HGHUDO&RPPXQLFDWLRQV&RPPLVVLRQ)&& State: )ORULGD City: 1DSOHV County:&ROOLHU USGS Topographic Map: %HOOH0HDGH1:)/SKRWRUHYLVHG Geographic Coordinates: 1$'1 ¶´:¶´ UTM:1$' =RQH(1 Total Area of Proposed Project:DFUHV VTIW Total Area Surveyed: DFUHV VTIW Survey Type:,QWHQVLYH&XOWXUDO5HVRXUFHV$VVHVVPHQW Results:1HJDWLYH 6XEWHUUDQHDQ&RQVXOWDQWV67&FRQGXFWHGDFXOWXUDOUHVRXUFHDVVHVVPHQWRIWKHSURSRVHG86)/ 6HQLRU7HTXLODWHOHFRPPXQLFDWLRQVIDFLOLW\RQ0D\LQFRPSOLDQFHZLWK6HFWLRQRIWKH 1DWLRQDO+LVWRULF3UHVHUYDWLRQ$FW1+3$RIDVDPHQGHG)LJXUH5RZ6WDU//&SURSRVHVWR FRQVWUXFWDIWPRQRSROHWHOHFRPPXQLFDWLRQWRZHUZLWKDQDGGLWLRQDOIWOLJKWQLQJURGIRUDWRWDO KHLJKWRIIW7KHDUFKDHRORJLFDOVXUYH\DUHDZDVHTXDOWRWKHDUHDRIJURXQGGLVWXUELQJDFWLYLW\$3( IRUGLUHFWHIIHFWVZKLFKZRXOGFRQVLVWRIDSURSRVHGIWE\IWPE\POHDVHDUHD DQGDSURSRVHGIWE\IWPE\PDFFHVVXWLOLW\HDVHPHQWDOOWRWDOLQJVTIWDF )LJXUH7KHSURSRVHGSURMHFWDUHDLVLQQRUWKZHVW&ROOLHU&RXQW\PLNPQRUWKHDVWRI1DSOHV )ORULGD7KHQHDUHVWLQWHUVHFWLRQWK6WUHHW6:DQGWK$YHQXHLVPLNPQRUWKZHVWRIWKHSURMHFW DUHD VHH )LJXUH 7R FRPSO\ ZLWK 6HFWLRQ RI WKH 1+3$ DQG WKH )HGHUDO &RPPXQLFDWLRQV &RPPLVVLRQ)&&1DWLRQZLGH3URJUDPPDWLF$JUHHPHQW13$&)53DUW67&IROORZHG&)5 3DUWRIWKH&RGHRI)HGHUDO5HJXODWLRQV&)5GXULQJWKLVLGHQWLILFDWLRQHIIRUWDQGLIVLJQLILFDQW DUFKDHRORJLFDOUHVRXUFHVDUHLGHQWLILHG67&ZRXOGDVVHVVUHVRXUFHVLJQLILFDQFHEDVHGRQ1DWLRQDO5HJLVWHU RI+LVWRULF3ODFHV15+3FULWHULD&)53DUW>DG@1RDUFKDHRORJLFDOUHVRXUFHVZHUHLGHQWLILHG GXULQJWKLVDVVHVVPHQW7KHUHIRUHWKHUHSRUWLVDEEUHYLDWHGDQGLQFOXGHVDWRSRJUDSKLFPDSRIWKHVXUYH\ YLFLQLW\HQYLURQPHQWDOFRQWH[WLQFOXGLQJSKRWRJUDSKVRIWKHSURMHFWDUHDVXUYH\HGUHVHDUFKDQGILHOG PHWKRGRORJLHVDQGUHVXOWV%LOO\0F&DUOH\0$53$VHUYHGDVSULQFLSDOLQYHVWLJDWRUIRUWKLVFXOWXUDO UHVRXUFHDVVHVVPHQW$SSHQGL[% Page 204 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 487 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Cultural Resource Assessment of the Proposed US-FL-7040 Senior Tequila Telecommunications Facility in Naples, Collier County, Florida 2 )LJXUH86*60LQXWH6HULHV%HOOH0HDGH1:)/SUWRSRJUDSKLFPDSGHSLFWLQJWKHSURMHFW YLFLQLW\DQGHQYLURQV Page 205 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 488 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Cultural Resource Assessment of the Proposed US-FL-7040 Senior Tequila Telecommunications Facility in Naples, Collier County, Florida 3 )LJXUH'LUHFW$3(GHSLFWHGRQDQ(65,DHULDOSKRWRJUDSK Page 206 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 489 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Cultural Resource Assessment of the Proposed US-FL-7040 Senior Tequila Telecommunications Facility in Naples, Collier County, Florida 4 ,,(19,5210(17$/&217(;7 Physiographic Province 7KHSURMHFWDUHDOLHVDORQJWKH%LJ&\SUHVVUHJLRQRIVRXWK)ORULGD7KH%LJ&\SUHVVLVDIODWUHJLRQ WRIHHWLQHOHYDWLRQDQGVOLJKWO\KLJKHUWKDQWKH(YHUJODGHVFRYHUHGE\SLQHIODWZRRGVRSHQVFUXE F\SUHVVSUDLULHW\SHJUDVVODQGV DQG H[WHQVLYHPDUVKDQGZHWODQGV3RRUO\GUDLQHGVRLOVRYHUOLH OLPHVWRQHFDOFDUHRXVVDQGVWRQHVPDUOVVZDPSGHSRVLWPXFNVDQGDOJDOPXGV/DNHVDUHDEVHQWIURP WKHUHJLRQ*ULIILWKHWDO Soils $FFRUGLQJWRWKH86'$:HE6RLO6XUYH\,PPRNDOHHILQHVDQGZDVIRUPHGDORQJWKHSURMHFWDUHD LQIODWZRRGVRUDORQJPDULQHWHUUDFHVLQVDQG\PDULQHGHSRVLWV7KHXSSHUKRUL]RQVFRQWDLQSRRUO\GUDLQHG WH[WXUHVRIILQHVDQGZLWKVXEVRLOJHQHUDOO\RFFXUULQJDWEHWZHHQDQGFHQWLPHWHUVEHORZWKHVXUIDFH FPEV7\SLFDOO\VXEVRLOLVEODFNILQHVDQG8QLWHG6WDWHV'HSDUWPHQWRI$JULFXOWXUH6RLO&RQVHUYDWLRQ 6HUYLFH>86'$6&6@ Vegetation 7KHSURMHFWDUHDOLHVZLWKLQWKH(DVWHUQ7HPSHUDWH)RUHVWHFRUHJLRQ+HUHWKHFDQRS\FRQVLVWVRIRDN KLFNRU\DQGSLQHZLWKDORZHUVWUDWXPRIWUHHIHUQVVKUXEVDQGKHUEDFHRXVSODQWV%DLOH\ Fauna 1DWLYHKDELWDWIRUWKHUHJLRQLQFOXGHVUDFFRRQZKLWHWDLOGHHUIO\LQJVTXLUUHOVUDEELWVRSRVVXPVDQG JURXQGURGHQWV:LOGWXUNH\DQGEREZKLWHDUHFRPPRQELUGVZKLOHWKHWLPEHUUDWWOHUDQGWXUWOHDUH FRPPRQUHSWLOHV%DLOH\ Page 207 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 490 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Cultural Resource Assessment of the Proposed US-FL-7040 Senior Tequila Telecommunications Facility in Naples, Collier County, Florida 5 ,,,0(7+2'2/2*< Fieldwork 7KLV$UFKDHRORJLFDOLQYHVWLJDWLRQZDVFRPSOHWHGLQFRPSOLDQFHZLWK6HFWLRQRIWKH1DWLRQDO +LVWRULF3UHVHUYDWLRQ$FWDVDPHQGHGDQGILHOGPHWKRGVJHQHUDOO\IROORZHGWKH)ORULGD'LYLVLRQRI +LVWRULFDO5HVRXUFHVModule Three: Guidelines for use by Historic Preservation Professionals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aboratory $UWLIDFWV LI ORFDWHG GXULQJ ILHOGZRUN SKRWRJUDSKV ILHOGQRWHV DQG PDSV ZLOO EH SUHSDUHG IRU SHUPDQHQW FXUDWLRQ IROORZLQJ WKH VWDQGDUGV DQG JXLGHOLQHV VHW IRUWK E\ WKH )ORULGD 'LYLVLRQ RI +LVWRULFDO5HVRXUFHVLQModule Three: Guidelines for use by Historic Preservations Professionals Records Review %DFNJURXQGUHVHDUFKZDVFRQGXFWHGYLDWKH)ORULGD0DVWHU6LWH)LOHWRGHWHUPLQHWKHSUHVHQFHRI SUHYLRXVO\UHFRUGHGDUFKDHRORJLFDOVLWHVZLWKLQNPPLRIWKHSURMHFWDUHDRUDUFKLWHFWXUDO UHVRXUFHVZLWKLQPLRIWKHSURMHFWDUHD Page 208 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 491 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Cultural Resource Assessment of the Proposed US-FL-7040 Senior Tequila Telecommunications Facility in Naples, Collier County, Florida 6 ,95(68/76 Research 7KHUHDUHQRSUHYLRXVO\UHFRUGHGDUFKDHRORJLFDOVLWHVZLWKLQNPPLRIWKHFXUUHQWSURMHFWDUHD 7KHUHDUHQRVLWHVRUVXUYH\VSUHYLRXVO\UHFRUGHGZLWKLQWKHFXUUHQWSURMHFWDUHDRISRWHQWLDOHIIHFW$3( IRUGLUHFWHIIHFWV7KHUHDUHQRHOLJLEOHRUOLVWHGDUFKLWHFWXUDOUHVRXUFHVZLWKLQPLRIWKHSURSRVHG SURMHFWDUHD+LVWRULFWRSRJUDSKLFPDSVLQGLFDWHQRKLVWRULFVWUXFWXUHVZLWKLQWKHGLUHFW$3( Field Archaeology 7KHSURMHFWDUHDZDVORFDWHGDORQJIODWVZLWKLQDQH[LVWLQJSDUNLQJORW7KHSURMHFWDUHDJURXQGVXUIDFH FRQVLVWHGRIJUDVVDQGSDYHPHQW)LJXUH )LJXUH3KRWRJUDSKRIGLUHFWHIIHFWV$3(IDFLQJQRUWKHDVW 7ZRQHJDWLYHVKRYHOWHVWVZHUHH[FDYDWHGDORQJWKHSURSRVHGSURMHFWDUHD)LJXUH6RLOVLQWKH SURMHFWDUHDZHUHKHDYLO\GLVWXUEHGOLNHO\GXHWRSDYLQJDQGJUDGLQJDFWLYLWLHVLQWKHSDVW*URXQGVXUIDFH YLVLELOLW\YDULHGEHWZHHQDQGSHUFHQW6RLOVFRQVLVWHGRIFPRIEURZQ<5VDQGIROORZHGE\ FPRISDOHEURZQ<5VDQGDQGFPRIEURZQLQJ\HOORZ<5VDQG7KHUHZHUHQR Page 209 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 492 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Cultural Resource Assessment of the Proposed US-FL-7040 Senior Tequila Telecommunications Facility in Naples, Collier County, Florida 7 DUFKDHRORJLFDOPDWHULDOVLHFXOWXUDOO\PRGLILHGDUWLIDFWVGHSRVLWVIHDWXUHVRUKXPDQUHPDLQV ZLWKLQWKHSURMHFWDUHD$3(IRUGLUHFWHIIHFWV )LJXUH(65,DHULDOGHSLFWLQJSURMHFWDUHDDQGVKRYHOWHVWLQJVWUDWHJ\ Page 210 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 493 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Cultural Resource Assessment of the Proposed US-FL-7040 Senior Tequila Telecommunications Facility in Naples, Collier County, Florida 8 9&21&/86,21 67& FRQGXFWHG D FXOWXUDO UHVRXUFH DVVHVVPHQW RI WKH SURSRVHG 86 )/ 6HQLRU 7HTXLOD WHOHFRPPXQLFDWLRQVIDFLOLW\GLUHFWDQGLQGLUHFW$3(V7KHUHZHUHQRFXOWXUDOPDWHULDOVLQWKHGLUHFWRU LQGLUHFW$3(V7KHUHIRUH67&UHFRPPHQGVDILQGLQJRINo Historic PropertiesLQWKHGLUHFWDQGLQGLUHFW $3(V 6KRXOGEXULHGDUWLIDFWVKXPDQUHPDLQVFXOWXUDOVLWHVRUJURXQGIHDWXUHVEHXQH[SHFWHGO\XQHDUWKHGGXULQJ JURXQGGLVWXUELQJDFWLYLWLHVDOOFRQVWUXFWLRQVKRXOGLPPHGLDWHO\FHDVHDQGWKHUHVRXUFHVEHH[DPLQHGE\D SURIHVVLRQDODUFKDHRORJLVW$GGLWLRQDOO\DOODSSURSULDWHDXWKRULWLHVLQFOXGLQJDOOSHUWLQHQWWULEDOHQWLWLHVDQG WKHVWDWHKLVWRULFSUHVHUYDWLRQRIILFHVKRXOGEHQRWLILHG Page 211 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 494 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Cultural Resource Assessment of the Proposed US-FL-7040 Senior Tequila Telecommunications Facility in Naples, Collier County, Florida 9 5()(5(1&(6&,7(' %DLOH\5REHUW* Description of the Ecoregions of the United States.8QLWHG6WDWHV'HSDUWPHQWRI$JULFXOWXUH :DVKLQJWRQ'& &DPSEHOO6FRWW.05XSHUW-'$UWKXU700LVVLPHU-0/OR\G-:<RQDQG-* 'XQFDQ )ORULGD*HRORJLF0DS'DWD8QLWHG6WDWHV*HRORJLF6HUYLFHV:DVKLQJWRQ'& )ORULGD'LYLVLRQRI+LVWRULFDO5HVRXUFHV)'+5 Module Three Guidelines for Use by Historic Preservations Professionals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age 212 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 495 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Cultural Resource Assessment of the Proposed US-FL-7040 Senior Tequila Telecommunications Facility in Naples, Collier County, Florida $33(1',;$ Project Plans Page 213 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 496 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 214 of 3233.E.bPacket Pg. 497Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Page 215 of 3233.E.bPacket Pg. 498Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Page 216 of 3233.E.bPacket Pg. 499Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Page 217 of 3233.E.bPacket Pg. 500Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Cultural Resource Assessment of the Proposed US-FL-7040 Senior Tequila Telecommunications Facility in Naples, Collier County, Florida $33(1',;% Principal Investigator CV Page 218 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 501 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Director of cultural resources at Subterranean Consultants, with over nine years of experience implementing project and business development. Lead communicator and organizer of project planning and research design, both utilized to chart and analyze project scoping and budgeting. Principal Investigator and director of archaeology and history consultations and Section 106. Skills Project Management MS Office Computer proficiency Public speaking skills Research and development ESRI Mapping Innovative project design and development Work History 2012-09 - Current Principal Investigator/Chief Archaeologist Subterranean Consultants, Atlanta, Georgia x Conducts phase I archaeological assessments, phase II evaluations, and phase III mitigation of NEPA projects (Section 106) and private development. x Conducts Section 106 projects include United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Section 404 permitting, Federal Energy Commission, United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) construction, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) construction, and FCC telecommunications projects. x Consults with over 40 State Historic Preservation Offices (SHPO) and Tribal Historic Preservation Offices. x Conducts tribal-requested construction of over 23 telecommunications towers. x Serves as principal investigator on Phase I, Phase II, and Phase III archaeology and history projects, including nineteenth century rice plantation, Fernbank BILLY J.MCCARLEY Anthropologist Address Colorado Springs, CO, 80919 Phone 720-708-9872 E-mail bmccarley@subterraneanco.com Page 219 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 502 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Museum-sponsored Hernando de Soto route expedition, and American Indian Lamar settlements along Georgia coast. x Conducts private due diligence surveys, including Georgia Municipal cemetery delineation and ancestral research, North Carolina cemetery survey and Phase II evaluations, large-scale solar developments in West Virginia, Indiana, Illinois, and Georgia, and residential and commercial developments throughout Georgia and Alabama. x Completes desktop assessments of fiber optics installation and impacts on NRHP-listed or NRHP-eligible archaeological sites. x Conducts fieldwork on all projects, including pre-visit research design development, background research, topographical map overlays, shovel testing, unit excavation, recordation, photographing, and report writing. x Makes recommendations on future site work and NRHP eligibility. x Records archaeological sites with state site files. x Conducts project scoping, proposals, grant writing, and NRHP nominations. x Prepares projects for curation according to agency curation standards. x Notable projects as principal investigator and field director include expansion and development cultural resource assessment of Habersham County Airport industrial complex, Section 404 USACE wetland permit cultural resource assessment in Sycamore, Georgia, Eagle-Net terrestrial fiber optics cultural resource assessment, ballpark expansion in Fairburn, Georgia, Osage Nation cultural resource assessment of county road construction, and prehistoric prayer rings in Death Valley National Park, Phase I Survey and Phase II Archaeological Survey and Evaluation of Effingham Parkway, Phase I survey of nineteenth century burials in Jackson, Gwinnett, and Effingham counties, archaeological survey of 174 road-side utility poles in Iowa and Nebraska, cultural resources assessment of 500-acre solar developments in West Virginia, Indiana, and Illinois, Phase II evaluation of African American burials in North Carolina, 32 node poles in New Orleans, and metal detecting of 42 acre portion of Civil War battlefield in Mechanicstown, WV. Class III Assessment of the City of Deadwood, SD. Class III investigation of 500-acre windfarm in southwest North Dakota. Class III inventory of the Pine Ridge Reservation in South Dakota. Twenty-five miles of historic railroad in Grand Junction, CO. 2014-06 - 2016-06 Principal Archaeologist/Senior Archaeologist Moreland Altobelli Associates, Inc, Norcross, Georgia x Conducted phase I and II archaeological assessments and evaluations of NEPA projects-United States Army Corp of Engineers (USACE) Section 404 permitting (cultural resource assessments) and Georgia Department of Transportation projects. Page 220 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 503 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) x Completed Section 106 reports and reviews, consulted with Georgia SHPO, and reviewed and sign reports written by staff archaeologists. x Conducted research design development, background research, topographical map overlays, shovel testing, unit excavation, recordation, photographing, report writing, and recommendations on future site work and NRHP eligibility. x Recorded archaeological sites with Georgia Archaeological Site File (GASF). x Conducted project scoping and proposals. x Prepared projects for curation following Antonio J.Waring Archaeological Laboratory or Erskine Ramsey Curation Facility, University of Alabama Museum curation standards. 2014-02 - 2014-04 Field Director Algonquin Consultants, Miami, Oklahoma x Served as field director on phase II evaluation of FCC permitting project in Jefferson City, Missouri. x Prepared research design for evaluation of cultural deposits at prehistoric lithic production site. x Supervised four employees in placement of four 1-by-1 test units. x Supervised data collection, site recordation, and reporting, including all GIS map production, post field- work. 2013-06 - 2013-08 Crew Chief Tetra Tech, Oklahoma City, OK x Served as crew chief on 85-mi pipeline cultural resource assessment spanning from Oklahoma to Texas. x Preplanned for daily field work, supervised crew of two field technicians in implementation of phase I shovel testing for Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) x Conducted transect layouts using Geoexplorer GPS unit. x Completed daily progress reports for submission to project field director. 2012-06 - 2013-02 Co-Principal Investigator/Field Director Georgia State University, Richmond Hill, Georgia x Investigated and excavated Middle Mississippian burial mound site along Ogeechee River in Richmond Hill, Georgia. x Prepared research design, gridded site using total station, implement NOAA provided LIDAR for regional comparative study of Middle Mississippian mound sites along Georgia coast. x Performed shovel testing on 5-acre mound site. x Analyze and curate artifacts post fieldwork and produce management summary and archaeological assessment report. Page 221 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 504 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) 2008-06 - 2012-06 Field Archaeologist Jacksonville State University Archaeological Laboratory, Jacksonville, Alabama x Investigated and excavated late Woodland to early Mississippian village along Choccolocco Creek in Calhoun County, Alabama. x Conducted unit layout and documentation; Excavated 2-by-2 units; Screened matrix; identified artifacts; and produced management summary of project progress. Education 2010-01 - 2012-05 Master of Arts: Anthropology Georgia State University - Atlanta Investigating Settlement Patterns and Intrasite Use, the Middle Mississippian Period, A.D. 1100 2004-01 - 2008-01 Bachelor of Arts: Sociology The University of Alabama - Tuscaloosa, Alabama Affiliations/Permits x Register of Professional Archaeologist (RPA) 2013 x Society for American Archaeology (SAA) 2013 Additional Information x AWARDS , Sigma Alpha Lambda, Leadership and Honors June 2008 Software ESRI, SPSS, Word, Excell Excellent Certifications Register of Professional Archaeologist RPA Metal Detecting National Parks Survey Methods Representative Publications/Reports Page 222 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 505 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) 2013 Phase I Archaeological Survey of the Proposed 80-Mile Pipeline, Wichita County, Texas 2013 An Archaeological Survey at Oak Level Mound: Investigating Settlement Patterns and Intrasite Use During the Middle Mississippian Period (A.D. 1150-1350) 2014 Phase I Archaeological Survey of the Proposed Harmony Senior Living Community, Spalding County, Georgia 2014 Phase I Archaeological Assessment of the Five Forks Trickum Road Widening, Gwinnett County, Georgia 2014 Addendum Phase I Archaeological Survey of 1-16 at Old River Road, Effingham County, Georgia 2014 Phase I Archaeological Survey for the Proposed 7th Street and Broad Street Bridge Replacements in Augusta, Richmond County, Georgia 2014 Phase I Archaeological Assessment of Habersham County Industrial Park, Habersham County, Georgia 2014 Phase I Archaeological Assessment of Dollar General Wetland Mitigation, Sycamore, Georgia 2014 Phase I Archaeological Assessment of Spence Ball Park Development, Fairburn, Georgia 2015 Phase I Archaeological Survey of Sigman Road Widening, Rockdale County, Georgia 2015 Phase I Archaeological Survey of the Proposed State Route (SR) 400 at McGinnis Ferry Road Interchange, Fulton and Forsyth Counties, Georgia 2015 Second Addendum Phase I Archaeological Survey of the Proposed East Kingsland Bypass, Camden County, Georgia 2016 Second Addendum Phase I Archaeological Survey of the Proposed Two Interchanges on Interstate 75, SR 7 and SR 122, Lowndes County, Georgia 2017 Phase I Archaeological Survey for the Proposed O'Reilly Auto Parts in Pigeon Forge, Tennessee 2017 Phase I Archaeological Survey for the City of Tuscumbia's Historic Rail Yard, Tuscumbia, Alabama 2017 Phase I Archaeological Survey of the Proposed Effingham Bypass, Effingham and Chatham Counties, Georgia 2017 Phase I Archaeological Survey of the Proposed El Dorado Boulevard, Harris County, Texas 2018 Phase II Archaeological Evaluation of the Rice Fields and Colebrook Plantation Cemetery along Effingham Bypass, Effingham and Chatham Counties, Georgia 2018 Phase I Archaeological Survey of the Proposed Harper Street Crossing, Fulton County, Georgia 2018 Phase I Archaeological Survey of the Proposed US 84 Connector, Liberty County, Georgia 2018 Phase I Archaeological Survey of the Proposed Gant Road Solar Development, Upper Marlboro County, Maryland 2018 Phase I Archaeological Survey of the Proposed Brown Bridge at Yellow River Replacement, Newton County, Georgia 2019 Phase I Archaeological Survey of the Proposed Zion Manor Senior Apartments II in Louisville Jefferson County, Kentucky 2019 Phase Ia Reconnaissance of the Hemmer Solar and Substation in Somerville, Indiana Gibson County 2019 Phase I Archaeological Survey of Wetland Delineation at Bonnaroo in Manchester, TN 2019 Anthropological Reconnaissance of Letohatchee Solar Development in Selma Alabama 2019 Phase I Archaeological Survey for Owl Creek Section 404 Permit in Towns County, GA 2019 Phase I Archaeological Survey of the Proposed Pineview Cemetery Telecommunications Facility in Mt. Olive, NC Page 223 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 506 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) 2019 Anthropology and Construction Monitoring of the Bogota Telecommunications Facility in Bogota, TN 2020 Archaeological Assessment and Phase II Evaluation of the High Horizons, Peel, and Thorn Parcels in Mechanicstown, Jefferson County, West Virginia 2020 Anthropology and Construction Monitoring for the Arkansas River Trail Telecommunications Facility in Conway, AR 2020 Phase I Archaeological Survey for the Section 404 Permit for Thornton Conveniences Store in Coopertown, Tennessee 2020 Archaeological Monitoring of Ground Disturbance at the Proposed E 862 Road Telecommunications Facility in Tenkiller, Cherokee County, Oklahoma 2020 Archaeological Monitoring of Ground Disturbance at the Proposed Alma Telecommunications Facility in Alma, Crawford County, Arkansas 2020 Archaeological Assessment of the Proposed McClellan Peak Tower Compound Expansion in Carson City, Washoe County, Nevada 2021 Class III Inventory of Cadle Property in Deadwood, Lawrence, SD 2021 Class III Inventory of Oglala Ten House Development at Pine Ridge, SD 2021 Archaeological Evaluation of seven sites and Class III Inventory in Bowman, ND Page 224 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 507 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila Attachment 4 Historic Properties Identified in the APE for Direct Effects Page 225 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 508 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila Historic Properties Identified in the APE for Direct Effects Lotis contracted Subterranean Consultants to perform a Cultural Resource Assessment to determine the potential effect on historic properties within the Direct Area of Potential Effect (APE). Subterranean Consultants conducted a records review and completed site reconnaissance, per SHPO and tribal protocols, and did not locate any archaeological sites within the Direct APE. Subterranean Consultants has recommended that the proposed undertaking be allowed to proceed as planned without further surveying. A copy of the Subterranean Consultants’ Cultural Resources Assessment report is included in Attachment 3. Page 226 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 509 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila Attachment 5 Historic Properties Identified in the APE for Visual Effects Page 227 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 510 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila Historic Properties Identified in the APE for Visual Effects Lotis contracted Subterranean Consultants to perform a Cultural Resource Assessment to determine the potential effect of the proposed undertaking on historic properties within the Visual Area of Potential Effect (APE). Subterranean Consultants completed a records review, within the ½-mile radius, per the DHR’s protocols (either online or physical records research) as well as reviewing the online National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) at http://www.nps.gov/nr/ and found no eligible/listed historic properties within the Visual APE. Subterranean Consultants has recommended that the proposed undertaking has No Historic Properties within the Visual APE and recommends that the project be allowed to proceed as planned without further surveying. A copy of the Subterranean Consultants’ Cultural Resources Assessment is included in Attachment 3. Page 228 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 511 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila Attachment 6 Tribal/NHO Involvement Page 229 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 512 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila Tribal/NHO Involvement Lotis utilized the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Tower Construction Notification System (TCNS) to identify federal tribal entities with interest in the proposed undertaking’s location. This identification phase was conducted on May 10, 2022 (TCNS Number 248897). The FCC responded, via e-mail, on May 13, 2022, indicating the following six (6) groups were forwarded information regarding the location of the proposed project, via electronic mail. 1. Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida 2. Seminole Tribe of Florida 3. Seminole Nation of Oklahoma 4. Muscogee (Creek) Nation 5. Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma 6. Thlopthlocco Tribal Town To date, Lotis has received clearance from all of the above listed tribes. Page 230 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 513 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) Tower Construction Notification System (TCNS) Proposed Tower Structure (PTS) Info Email Page 231 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 514 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) 1 NEPA NHPA From:towernotifyinfo@fcc.gov Sent:Tuesday, May 10, 2022 10:48 PM To:NEPA NHPA Subject:Proposed Tower Structure Info - Email ID #8132973 Dear Judiann Norris, Thank you for submitting a notification regarding your proposed construction via the Tower Construction Notification System. Note that the system has assigned a unique Notification ID number for this proposed construction. You will need to reference this Notification ID number when you update your project's Status with us. Below are the details you provided for the construction you have proposed: Notification Received: 05/10/2022 Notification ID: 248899 Tower Owner Individual or Entity Name: VB BTS, LLC Consultant Name: Miles C Walz Salvador Street Address: 8899 Main Street, Suite 107 City: Williamsville State: NEW YORK Zip Code: 14221 Phone: 716-580-7000 Email: NEPA.NHPA@TheLotisGroup.com Structure Type: LTOWER - Lattice Tower Latitude: 32 deg 07 min 23.6 sec N Longitude: 89 deg 24 min 2.6 sec W Location Description: near 8430 Hwy 501 City: Louin State: MISSISSIPPI County: SMITH Detailed Description of Project: A proposed 300/310' self-support lattice telecommunications tower within an odd-shaped lease area, approximately 11,000 square feet. Also included is a 30' by approximately 336' access/utility easement. Ground Elevation: 121.5 meters Support Structure: 91.4 meters above ground level Overall Structure: 94.5 meters above ground level Overall Height AMSL: 216 meters above mean sea level Page 232 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 515 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) Tower Construction Notification System (TCNS) Notice of Organizations (NOO) Email Page 233 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 516 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) 1 NEPA NHPA From:towernotifyinfo@fcc.gov Sent:Friday, May 13, 2022 2:01 AM To:NEPA NHPA Cc:tcnsweekly@fcc.gov Subject:NOTICE OF ORGANIZATION(S) WHICH WERE SENT PROPOSED TOWER CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION INFORMATION - Email ID #8137920 Dear Applicant: Thank you for using the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) Tower Construction Notification System (TCNS). The purpose of this electronic mail message is to inform you that the following authorized persons were sent the notification that you provided through TCNS, which relates to your proposed antenna structure. The information was forwarded by the FCC to authorized TCNS users by electronic mail and/or regular mail (letter). We note that the review period for all parties begins upon receipt of the Submission Packet pursuant to Section VII.A of the NPA and notifications that do not provide this serve as information only. Persons who have received the notification that you provided include leaders or their designees of federally-recognized American Indian Tribes, including Alaska Native Villages (collectively "Tribal Nations"), Native Hawaiian Organizations (NHOs), and State Historic Preservation Officers (SHPOs). For your convenience in identifying the referenced Tribal Nations and NHOs and in making further contacts, the City and State of the Seat of Government for each Tribal Nation and NHO, as well as the designated contact person, is included in the listing below. We note that Tribal Nations may have Section 106 cultural interests in ancestral homelands or other locations that are far removed from their current Seat of Government. Pursuant to the Commission's rules as set forth in the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement for Review of Effects on Historic Properties for Certain Undertakings Approved by the Federal Communications Commission (NPA), all Tribal Nations and NHOs listed below must be afforded a reasonable opportunity to respond to this notification, consistent with the procedures set forth below, unless the proposed construction falls within an exclusion designated by the Tribal Nation or NHO. (NPA, Section IV.F.4). The notification that you provided was forwarded to the following Tribal Nations and NHOs. A Tribal Nation or NHO may not respond until a full Submission Packet is provided. If, upon receipt, the Tribal Nation or NHO does not respond within a reasonable time, you should make a reasonable effort at follow-up contact, unless the Tribal Nation or NHO has agreed to different procedures (NPA, Section IV.F.5). In the event a Tribal Nation or NHO does not respond to a follow-up inquiry, or if a substantive or procedural disagreement arises between you and a Tribal Nation or NHO, you must seek guidance from the Commission (NPA, Section IV.G). These procedures are further set forth in the FCC's Second Report and Order released on March 30, 2018 (FCC 18-30). 1. Real Estate Director Kevin Donaldson - Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida - Tamiami Station (PO Box: 440021) Miami, FL - hopel@miccosukeetribe.com - 305-223-8380 (ext: 2246) - regular mail If the applicant/tower builder receives no response from the Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida within 30 days after notification through TCNS, the Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida has no interest in participating in pre-construction review for the proposed site. The Applicant/tower builder, Page 234 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 517 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) 2 however, must immediately notify the Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida in the event archaeological properties or human remains are discovered during construction, consistent with Section IX of the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement and applicable law. 2. Compliance Review Supervisor THPO Compliance - Seminole Tribe of Florida - 30290 Josie Billie Hwy PMB 1004 Clewiston, FL - THPOcompliance@semtribe.com - 863-983-6549 (ext: 12245) - electronic mail 3. Tribal Historic Preservation Officer Ben Yahola - Seminole Nation of Oklahoma - (PO Box: 1498) Wewoka, OK - tcns-sno@sno-nsn.gov - 405-234-5218 - electronic mail Exclusions: Please send all inquiries to email address: tcns-sno@sno-nsn.gov If the applicant/tower builder receives no response from the Seminole Nation of Oklahoma within 30 days after notification through TCNS, the Seminole Nation of Oklahoma has no interest in participating in pre- construction review for the proposed site. The Applicant/tower builder, however, must immediately notify the Seminole Nation of Oklahoma in the event archaeological properties or human remains are discovered during construction, consistent with Section IX of the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement and applicable law. 4. TCNS Coordinator Anne Edwards-Martel Ms - Muscogee (Creek) Nation - Highway 75 & Loop 56 (PO Box: 580) Okmulgee, OK - mcntcns@mcn-nsn.gov; section106@mcn-nsn.gov - 918-732-7639 - regular mail 5. Cell Tower Coordinator Kelly Nelson - Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma - 70500 East 128 Road Wyandotte, OK - celltower@estoo.net - 918-238-5151 (ext: 1861) - regular mail Exclusions: DO NOT EMAIL DOCUMENTATION; it will be deleted without being opened. Submit one printed color copy by US postal mail or other parcel carrier of all documentation to: Eastern Shawnee Tribe Attn: CellTower Program 70500 E. 128 Rd. Wyandotte, OK 74370 Provide a 1-page cover letter with the following information: a. TCNS Number b. Company Name c. Project Name, City, County, State d. Project type e. Project coordinates f. Contact information The Eastern Shawnee Procedures document is available and highly recommended for guidance; send an email to celltower@estoo.net requesting our most current copy. Page 235 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 518 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) 3 6. Mekko Ryan Morrow - Thlopthlocco Tribal Town - P.O. Box 188 Okemah, OK - thpo@tttown.org - 000-000-0000 - electronic mail Exclusions: Thlopthlocco Tribal Town requests that all initial review materials required by applicable law be submitted by email directly to thpo@tttown.org. In addition, in the event archeological or cultural materials or human remains are discovered at any time during this undertaking, please notify Thlopthlocco Tribal Town immediately. The notification that you provided was also forwarded to the following SHPOs in the State in which you propose to construct and neighboring States. The information was provided to these SHPOs as a courtesy for their information and planning. You need make no effort at this time to follow up with any SHPO that does not respond to this notification. Prior to construction, you must provide the SHPO of the State in which you propose to construct (or the Tribal Historic Preservation Officer, if the project will be located on certain Tribal lands), with a Submission Packet pursuant to Section VII.A of the NPA unless the project is excluded from SHPO review under Section III D or E of the NPA. 7. SHPO Lee Warner - Alabama Historical Commission - 468 South Perry Street Montgomery, AL - lwarner@mail.preserveala.org - 334-242-3184 - electronic mail 8. Deputy SHPO Elizabeth Ann Brown - Alabama Historical Commission - 468 South Perry Street Montgomery, AL - ebrown@mail.preserveala.org - 334-242-3185 - electronic mail 9. Deputy SHPO Compliance Review Laura A Kammerer - Div of Historical Resources, Dept of State - 500 S. Bronough St. Tallahassee, FL - lkammerer@dos.state.fl.us - 850-245-6333 - electronic mail 10. Historic Preservationist Corey Lentz - Florida Division of Historical Resources - 500 S. Bronough Street Tallahasse, FL - Corey.Lentz@dos.myflorida.com - 850-245-6333 - electronic mail TCNS automatically forwards all notifications to all Tribal Nations and SHPOs that have an expressed interest in the geographic area of a proposal. However, if a proposal for PTC wayside poles falls within a designated exclusion, you need not expect any response and need not pursue any additional process with that Tribal Nation or SHPO. In addition, a particular Tribal Nation or SHPO may also set forth policies or procedures within its details box that exclude from review certain facilities (for example, a statement that it does not review collocations with no ground disturbance; or that indicates that no response within 30 days indicates no interest in participating in pre-construction review). Page 236 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 519 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) 4 Please be advised that the FCC cannot guarantee that the contact(s) listed above have opened and reviewed an electronic or regular mail notification. If you learn that any of the above contact information is no longer valid, please contact the FCC by emailing tcnshelp@fcc.gov. The following information relating to the proposed tower was forwarded to the person(s) listed above: Notification Received: 05/10/2022 Notification ID: 248897 Excluded from SHPO Review: No Tower Owner Individual or Entity Name: VB BTS, LLC Consultant Name: Miles C Walz Salvador Street Address: 8899 Main Street, Suite 107 City: Williamsville State: NEW YORK Zip Code: 14221 Phone: 716-580-7000 Email: NEPA.NHPA@TheLotisGroup.com Structure Type: POLE - Any type of Pole Latitude: 26 deg 10 min 55.9 sec N Longitude: 81 deg 41 min 6.6 sec W Location Description: near 2560 39th Street SW City: Naples State: FLORIDA County: COLLIER Detailed Description of Project: A proposed construction of a 145/155' monopine telecommunications tower within a 70' by 70' lease area. Also included is a 20' by 563' access easement. Additionally included is a 10' by 505' utility easement. Ground Elevation: 3.5 meters Support Structure: 44.2 meters above ground level Overall Structure: 47.2 meters above ground level Overall Height AMSL: 50.7 meters above mean sea level If you have any questions or comments regarding this notice, please contact the FCC using the electronic Help Request form located on the FCC's website at: https://www.fcc.gov/wireless/available-support-services You may also call the FCC Support Center at (877) 480-3201 (TTY 717-338-2824). Hours are from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday through Friday (except Federal holidays). To provide quality service and ensure security, all telephone calls are recorded. Thank you, Federal Communications Commission Page 237 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 520 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila Attachment 7 Local Government Involvement Page 238 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 521 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila Collier County Planning Submission Note: In the interest of efficiency and economy, attachments included in the original submission under this section are not duplicated throughout this NEPA Summary. The following attachment(s), found at the conclusion of this report, were included in the original submission: • Proposed Project Summary • Attachment 1 - Maps • Attachment 2 - Photographs Page 239 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 522 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) (716)580Ͳ7000www.thelotisgroup.comLotisEnvironmental,LLC8899MainStreet,Suite107 Williamsville,NY14221 June 3, 2022 Collier County Planning Attn: Timothy Finn 2800 North Horseshoe Drive North Naples, Florida 34104 Submitted via email: timothy.finn@colliercountyfl.gov RE: Proposed Telecommunications Tower Undertaking “Senor Tequila” in Collier County, Florida; VB BTS, LLC To Whom It May Concern: VB BTS, LLC (VB BTS), is proposing to construct a tower installation within the general vicinity of near 2560 39th Street Southwest, Naples, Collier County, Florida 34117. Lotis Environmental, LLC (Lotis), is preparing an environmental and cultural resource review on behalf of VB BTS as part of its permit process and regulatory review by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Please consider this correspondence an invitation to the Collier County Planning to comment on the possible effects the proposed undertaking may have on sites or structures of historic significance within the general vicinity. Attached, please find information pertaining to the proposed undertaking. This information includes a project summary, an aerial photograph, a topographic map, and photographs of the proposed undertaking’s site and adjacent properties. As part of our research, Lotis is consulting with the Division of Historical Resources, and will forward any concerns of the Collier County Planning regarding historic properties to the Division of Historical Resources. Lotis respectfully requests that you provide comment within 30 days regarding the possible effects of this undertaking on historic properties. If a response is not received within 30 days, Lotis will assume you have no interest/concern with the proposed undertaking. Should you require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at (716) 580-7000. Thank you for your time and consideration in this regard. Sincerely, Lotis Environmental, LLC Miles Walz-Salvador Nationwide NEPA/NHPA Manager NEPA.NHPA@TheLotisGroup.com Enclosures Page 240 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 523 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila Proof of Collier County Planning Submission Page 241 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 524 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) 1 NEPA NHPA From:NEPA NHPA Sent:Friday, June 03, 2022 4:36 PM To:imothy.finn@colliercountyfl.gov Cc:Miles Walz-Salvador; Jordan Braden Subject:Opportunity to comment on proposed telecommunication project "Senor Tequila" located in "Collier County, Florida Attachments:CLG SUB 6.3.2022.pdf; Senor Tequila US-FL-7040.kmz Importance:High TrackingTracking:Recipient Read imothy.finn@colliercountyfl.gov Miles Walz-Salvador Jordan Braden Read: 6/6/2022 9:43 PM To Whom It May Concern, Lotis is completing Section 106 NEPA compliance due diligence regarding the above proposed telecommunication project known as “Senor Tequila”. Part of this due diligence includes giving the local government/jurisdiction the opportunity to comment on whether or not the proposed telecommunications project will have an effect on historic properties. I have attached the project summary, site maps, KMZ file (for Google Earth aerial view) and site photos of the proposed Subject Property in question. The Section 106 consultation process allows you 30 days to respond. Should you not respond within 30 days we will assume you have no concern or comment regarding the proposed undertaking. However, should you not want to comment we ask that you state so in a response to aid us in our timeline for this project. Should you have an additional request for information, please feel free to contact my supervisor via phone at (314)-913-0505 or by responding all to this email. We will do our best to supplement you with any additional documentation or information regarding the proposed undertaking. Thank you for your time and consideration. Jordan Braden NEPA Administrative Assistant 8899 Main Street – Suite 107 Williamsville, NY 14221 www.thelotisgroup.com Phone: 716.580.7000 Mobile: 417.839.3701 Braden@thelotisgroup.com *Please Note – Our Address and Phone Number have changed as of February 2022* Page 242 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 525 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila Collier County Planning’s Response (NONE) Page 243 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 526 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila Attachment 8 Public Involvement Page 244 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 527 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila Legal Public Notice Text and Affidavit of Publication Page 245 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 528 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila Lotis contacted the The Naples Daily News and published a legal public notice in the classified section. The proposed undertaking is detailed in the notice and calls for the recognition of public concerns on any historic property impacts caused by the proposed undertaking. A copy of the legal notice text and Affidavit of Publication are attached. “VB BTS, LLC would like to place on notice the proposed construction of an installation consisting of a 145’ (155’ including all appurtenances) monopine tower known as Senor Tequila located at 26°10’55.91” north latitude and -81°41’06.58” west longitude at the approximate vicinity of at near 2560 39th Street Southwest, Naples, Collier County, Florida 34117. If you have any concerns regarding historic properties that may be affected by this proposed undertaking, please contact: Miles Walz-Salvador, Lotis Environmental, LLC, at NEPA.NHPA@TheLotisGroup.com or (716) 580-7000. In your response, please include the proposed undertaking’s location and a list of the historic resources that you believe to be affected along with their respective addresses or approximate locations.” Page 246 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 529 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 247 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 530 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila Collier County Museum Submission Note: In the interest of efficiency and economy, attachments included in the original submission under this section are not duplicated throughout this NEPA Summary. The following attachment(s), found at the conclusion of this report, were included in the original submission: x Proposed Project Summary x Attachment 1 - Maps x Attachment 2 - Photographs Page 248 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 531 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) (716)580Ͳ7000www.thelotisgroup.comLotisEnvironmental,LLC8899MainStreet,Suite107 Williamsville,NY14221 June 3, 2022 Collier County Museum 3331 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34112 Submitted via email: museums@colliergov.net RE: Proposed Telecommunications Tower Undertaking “Senor Tequila” in Collier County, Florida; VB BTS, LLC To Whom It May Concern: VB BTS, LLC (VB BTS), is proposing to construct a tower installation within the general vicinity of near 2560 39th Street Southwest, Naples, Collier County, Florida 34117. Lotis Environmental, LLC (Lotis), is preparing an environmental and cultural resource review on behalf of VB BTS as part of its permit process and regulatory review by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Please consider this correspondence an invitation to the Collier County Museum to comment on the possible effects the proposed undertaking may have on sites or structures of historic significance within the general vicinity. Attached, please find information pertaining to the proposed undertaking. This information includes a project summary, an aerial photograph, a topographic map, and photographs of the proposed undertaking’s site and adjacent properties. As part of our research, Lotis is consulting with the Division of Historical Resources, and will forward any concerns of the Collier County Museum regarding historic properties to the Division of Historical Resources. Lotis respectfully requests that you provide comment within 30 days regarding the possible effects of this undertaking on historic properties. If a response is not received within 30 days, Lotis will assume you have no interest/concern with the proposed undertaking. Should you require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at (716) 580-7000. Thank you for your time and consideration in this regard. Sincerely, Lotis Environmental, LLC Miles Walz-Salvador Nationwide NEPA/NHPA Manager NEPA.NHPA@TheLotisGroup.comEnclosures Page 249 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 532 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila Proof of Collier County Museum Submission Page 250 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 533 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) 1 NEPA NHPA From:NEPA NHPA Sent:Friday, June 03, 2022 4:40 PM To:museums@colliergov.net Cc:Miles Walz-Salvador; Jordan Braden Subject:Opportunity to comment on proposed telecommunication project "Senor Tequila" located in "Collier County, Florida" Attachments:ITC SUB 6.3.2022.pdf; Senor Tequila US-FL-7040.kmz Importance:High TrackingTracking:Recipient Delivery Read museums@colliergov.net Miles Walz-Salvador Delivered: 6/3/2022 4:40 PM Jordan Braden Delivered: 6/3/2022 4:40 PM Read: 6/6/2022 9:43 PM To Whom It May Concern: Lotis is completing Section 106 NEPA compliance due diligence regarding the above proposed telecommunication project known as “Senor Tequila”. Part of this due diligence includes giving a local interested party the opportunity to comment on whether or not the proposed telecommunications project will have an effect on historic properties. I have attached the project summary, site maps, KMZ file (for Google Earth aerial view) and site photos of the proposed Subject Property in question. The Section 106 consultation process allows you 30 days to respond. Should you not respond within 30 days we will assume you have no concern or comment regarding the proposed undertaking. However, should you not want to comment we ask that you state so in a response to aid us in our timeline for this project. Should you have an additional request for information, please feel free to contact my supervisor via phone at (314)-913-0505 or by responding all to this email. We will do our best to supplement you with any additional documentation or information regarding the proposed undertaking. Thank you for your time and consideration. Jordan Braden NEPA Administrative Assistant 8899 Main Street – Suite 107 Williamsville, NY 14221 www.thelotisgroup.com Phone: 716.580.7000 Mobile: 417.839.3701 Braden@thelotisgroup.com *Please Note – Our Address and Phone Number have changed as of February 2022* Page 251 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 534 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila Collier County Museum’s Response (NONE) Page 252 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 535 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila Attachment 9 Curricula Vitae Page 253 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 536 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila DAVID N. ROBINSON, P.E. President/CEO, Lotis Environmental, LLC Years of Experience 18+ Education M.S., Environmental Engineering, University of Colorado at Boulder, 1995 B.S., Civil Engineering, State University of New York at Buffalo, 1994 A.A.S., Architectural Engineering, Alfred State College, 1990 Professional Affiliations New York State Wireless Association Professional Registrations Professional Engineer, New York 2001 (079047) Certifications FEMA Public Assistance Program Operations I OSHA 40 Hr. Hazardous Waste Site Worker Training Nokia CMPro Cost Control Training Key Qualifications David Robinson founded The Lotis Engineering Group/Lotis Environmental, LLC and has served as CEO since its inception in 2007. Mr. Robinson is a New York State Professional Engineer and an ASTM-recognized Environmental Professional. Over his 19-year professional career, Mr. Robinson has performed over 18,000 Phase I Environmental Site Assessments in all 50 states and Canada. As CEO of Lotis, Mr. Robinson directs the strategic direction of the company. Under his leadership, Lotis has flourished into a leader in the Environmental Due Diligence industry. Telecommunications Experience • Vertical Bridge Holdings, Nationwide, US (2014-ongoing): Project Manager/Engineer for services relating to the acquisition and development of telecommunications tower sites throughout the United States. Services include Phase I Environmental Site Assessments. David has been responsible for managing resources to complete these services on hundreds of telecommunication sites. • Tower Ventures, LLC, Nationwide, US (2011-ongoing): Project Manager/Engineer for services relating to the acquisition and development of telecommunications tower sites throughout the United States. Services include Phase I Environmental Site Assessments. David has been responsible for managing resources to complete these services on many telecommunication sites. Page 254 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 537 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila • Global Tower Partners, Inc., Nationwide, US (2004-2013): Project Manager/Engineer for services relating to the acquisition and development of telecommunications tower sites throughout the United States. Services include property surveys, 2C surveys, Phase I Environmental Site Assessments, NEPA compliance studies, zoning issues, and structural evaluation of existing towers. David has been responsible for managing resources to complete these services on over 5,000 sites in all 50 states and the Caribbean. • SBA, Inc. Acquisition Services, Nationwide, US (2001-2011): Project Manager/Engineer for services relating to the acquisition and development of telecommunications tower sites throughout the United States. Services include property surveys, 2C surveys, Phase I Environmental Site Assessments, NEPA compliance studies, zoning issues, and structural evaluation of existing towers. David has been responsible for managing resources to complete these services on over 7,000 sites in all 50 states, the Caribbean and Canada. • AT&T NexGen, Nationwide, US (2004): Project Engineer for this 16,000-mile long-haul fiber-optic confidential construction project throughout the United States. David was responsible for preparing tax recording documents needed to file taxes for AT&T’s fiber build. • Nassau County Police Department Land Mobile Radio System Modernization Project (2005-2007): Project Manager for engineering services relating to the upgrade of Nassau County’s public safety communication system. Services include site design, construction drawing preparation, property surveys, 1A surveys, Phase I Environmental Site Assessments, NEPA compliance studies, zoning issues, and structural evaluation of existing towers. David has been responsible for managing resources to complete these services on 36 sites throughout the county. • The City of New York Department of Information Technology and Telecommunications Channel 16 Project (2005- 2007): Project Manager for engineering services relating to the design and construction of a conventional/trunked radio system for FDNY and other New York City agencies. Services include site design, construction drawing preparation, property surveys, 1A surveys, Phase I Environmental Site Assessments, NEPA compliance studies, zoning issues, and structural evaluation of existing towers. David has been responsible for managing resources to complete these services on 7 sites in New York City. • NorthStar Communications, Inc., Florida (2003-2004: Project Manager for services relating to the development of telecommunications tower sites throughout Florida for Nextel. Services included construction drawings, property surveys, 2C surveys, zoning issues, and structural evaluation of existing towers. David was responsible for managing resources to complete these services on over 20 sites in the state of Florida. Other Experience • BNMC Utilities Relocation, Buffalo, New York (2002): Civil Engineer for the design of utility relocations at Roswell Park in Buffalo. David was responsible for developing construction documents and specifications, as well as providing consulting services throughout the design process. His duties also included preparation of construction cost estimates and submittal review. • NFTA Metro Bus – Bus Fueling Station Systems Modifications for Dual Fuel, Buffalo, New York (2002): Civil Engineer for the design and preparation of design drawings, specifications, and cost estimate for the replacement of an existing single fuel system to that of a dual fuel system. • New Jersey DPMC Underground Storage Tank Program, New Jersey (1999-2001): Civil Engineer for the design of new aboveground and underground tank fueling systems (including fuel dispensers, leak detection systems, inventory control systems, and concrete tank slabs) for various State Departments in New Jersey. David was responsible for developing design drawings, construction documents and specifications, as well as providing consulting services throughout the construction process. His duties also included creating and maintaining resource-loaded project schedules for project using Primavera project scheduling software. • Former Hyatt Clark Industries, Inc. Site, New Jersey (1996-1998): Civil engineer for the preparation for the closure and remediation of the Former GM Industrial site and the construction of a 9-hole golf course recreational undertaking (including Driving Range, Putting Course, Clubhouse and Maintenance Facilities). David was responsible for the design of the golf course drainage system which included a 5-acre retention pond to be used for irrigation during periods of drought. His duties also included preparing cost estimates for the site closure and subsequent golf course construction, and the modeling and design of the undertaking entrance and parking. Page 255 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 538 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila • Wegmans Food Pharmacy, Buffalo, New York (1998): Civil engineer for the construction of a supermarket on a former industrial site. David was responsible for and the modeling and design of the undertaking entrance. His duties also included field sampling of excavated soil during construction. • USACE-Buffalo District, Cuyahoga River Bulkheads Study, Ohio (1999): Civil Engineer for the USACE’s bulkhead inspection program along nine miles of the Cuyahoga River in Cleveland, Ohio. David was responsible for preparing a structural assessment of bulkhead along the river by inspecting various conditions of the sheet pile (i.e., corrosion levels, settling). His duties also included preparing remediation recommendations and subsequent cost estimates for damaged bulkhead sections. • USACE-Buffalo District, Advance Measures Program, New York (1999): Civil Engineer for the study of high Lake Erie levels on four residential areas. David was responsible for gathering residential home elevations and comparing them to historical rain and lake level data. Based on these comparisons and a detailed cost analysis, recommendations to alleviate local residential flooding, including the design of breakwaters and levees, were made. • FEMA Public Assistance Program, Puerto Rico (1998-1999): Civil Engineer for the inspection of public facilities damaged by Hurricane Georges. David was responsible for gathering field data on hurricane damages, designing mitigation alternatives, and preparing detailed cost analyses of damages. • NYCDDC Underground Storage Tank Program, New York (1999-2001): Civil Engineer for the design of groundwater/soil remediation systems for the cleanup of petroleum-contaminated groundwater and soils. Groundwater remediation systems typically consisted of the design and installation of pneumatic and electric dual pumping systems for the removal of free phase and dissolved phase contamination. Soil remediation systems incorporated the design and installation of soil vapor extraction systems and bioventing systems. • Lipari Landfill, New Jersey (1996-1997): Civil Engineer for offsite remediation work at the Lipari Superfund site. David was responsible for modeling migration rates of contaminants from the Superfund site through surrounding soil strata Page 256 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 539 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila MILES C. WALZ-SALVADOR Nationwide NEPA/NHPA Manager, Lotis Environmental, LLC Years of Experience 8+ Education Bachelor of Science in Fisheries & Wildlife, the University of Missouri - Columbia, 2011 Bachelor of Science in Forestry, the University of Missouri - Columbia, 2011 Minor in Biological Science, the University of Missouri - Columbia, 2011 Certifications EPA Asbestos Certification Colorado State Asbestos Building Inspector Certification OSHA 10-Hr Safety & Health – Construction Certification ACOE 38-hr Wetland Delineation Certification of completion OSHA 40-Hr Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response Certification Key Qualifications Mr. Walz-Salvador has gained experience performing informal biological assessments for Section 7 compliance under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), wetland impact determinations, floodplain determinations, threatened and endangered species determinations, critical habitat research, as well as writing National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) environmental assessments for wireless telecommunication projects. He has conducted research regarding Section 106 compliance under the Federal Communications Commission standards. Under Section 106, he has experience with 620 and 621 Form submittals to the State Historical Preservation Offices and consultation with federally recognized tribes all over the United States. Mr. Walz-Salvador has experience performing Phase I & II environmental site assessments, indoor air quality assessments, asbestos building inspections and sampling, wetland delineations, and migratory bird evaluations. In addition, Mr. Walz-Salvador has experience with the United States Geological Survey (USGS) as a biological science aid, where he conducted field research on the Missouri River capturing and tracking Pallid Sturgeon. He also worked with the Missouri Department of Conservation (MDC) as a field technician conducting research on endangered and endemic fish species within the waterways of the Missouri Ozarks. Additionally, he has also worked in a variety of fields such as wetland biology, avian ecology, and ungulate research and management for the MDC. While attending the University of Missouri- Columbia, Mr. Walz-Salvador participated in the Undergraduate Mentoring for Environmental Biology (UMEB) Program which aided him in gaining experience with migratory bird research underneath the guidance of Dr. John Faaborg and Dr. Andrew Cox. UMEB also allowed Mr. Walz-Salvador to work with the Missouri Botanical Garden, a partner company, to observe endangered plant research and gain experience with working with private entities. Mr. Walz-Salvador’s schooling and work experience has enabled him to identify and understand the biology of trees, birds, fish, and mammalian species in addition to technical skills with the Delorme Topographic USA mapping program, ArcGIS, several of the Microsoft Office Programs, Adobe Acrobat Pro, and Google Earth. Page 257 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 540 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila Telecommunications Experience • Lotis Environmental, LLC. Nationwide, US (2020-ongoing): Nationwide NEPA/NHPA Manager / Biologist for services relating to compliance of NEPA, NHPA, and the ESA for the construction/acquisition of telecommunication towers throughout the United States including Puerto Rico, Canada, and Mexico. Services include Phase I & Phase 2 Environmental Site Assessments, and NEPA compliance for Vertical Bridge Land Holdings, LLC, Tower Ventures, Tower Lease Advisors, Phoenix Towers International, InSite Towers, and BlueSky Tower. • The Lotis Engineering Group, PC. Nationwide, US (2015-2020): Nationwide NEPA/NHPA Manager / Biologist for services relating to compliance of NEPA, NHPA, and the ESA for the construction/acquisition of telecommunication towers throughout the United States including Puerto Rico, Canada, and Mexico. Services include Phase I & Phase 2 Environmental Site Assessments, and NEPA compliance for Vertical Bridge Land Holdings, LLC, Tower Ventures, Tower Lease Advisors, Phoenix Towers International, InSite Towers, and BlueSky Tower. • Trileaf Corporation, Nationwide, US (2013-2015): Senior Project Scientist: Wetland Ecologist and Migratory Bird Specialist for services relating to the NEPA/NHPA compliance of the proposed construction of telecommunication tower sites throughout the United States. Services include Phase I & Phase 2 Environmental Site Assessments, Indoor Air Quality Surveys, Asbestos Sampling, NEPA compliance, Migratory Bird Evaluations and Wetland delineations for Verizon Wireless, AT&T Mobility Services, LLC, SBA Communications, Crown Castle Towers, T- Mobile, Nextel, and Edward Jones. Page 258 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 541 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila Division of Historical Resources (DHR) Submission Note: In the interest of efficiency and economy, attachments included in the original submission under this section are not duplicated throughout this NEPA Summary. The following attachment(s), found at the conclusion of this report, were included in the original submission: • Proposed Project Summary • Form 620/621 • Attachment 1 - Maps • Attachment 2 - Photographs • Attachment 3 - Areas of Potential Effects (Cultural Resource Report) • Attachment 4 - Historic Properties Identified in the APE for Direct Effects • Attachment 5 - Historic Properties Identified in the APE for Visual Effects • Attachment 6 - Tribal/NHO Involvement • Attachment 7 - Local Government Involvement • Attachment 8 - Public Involvement • Attachment 9 - Curricula Vitae • Attachment 10 - SHPO Specific Documentation (If required) Page 259 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 542 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) (716)580Ͳ7000www.thelotisgroup.comLotisEnvironmental,LLC8899MainStreet,Suite107 Williamsville,NY14221 June 3, 2022 Division of Historical Resources Attn: Alayna Gould 500 South Bronough Street R.A. Gray Building, Room 305 Tallahassee, Florida 32399 RE:Proposed Telecommunications Tower Undertaking “Senor Tequila” in Collier County, Florida, VB BTS, LLC; TCNS #: 248897 To Whom It May Concern: VB BTS, LLC (VB BTS), is proposing to construct a tower installation and associated equipment within the general vicinity of near 2560 39th Street Southwest, Naples, Collier County, Florida 34117. Lotis Environmental, LLC (Lotis), is preparing a cultural resource and environmental review on behalf of VB BTS as part of its permit process and regulatory review by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Please consider this correspondence an invitation to the DHR to comment on the possible direct or visual effects the proposed undertaking may have on eligible/listed sites or structures of historic significance within the Area of Potential Effect (APE). By providing your signature or stamp of approval, you concur with Lotis’ recommendation finding of No Historic Properties on eligible/listed sites or structures of historic significance within the APE. Attached, please find the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) completed Form 620 and corresponding attachments for the proposed undertaking. Should you require further information, please do not hesitate to contact me at (716) 580-7000 or NEPA.NHPA@TheLotisGroup.com. Thank you for your time and consideration in these regards. Sincerely, Lotis Environmental, LLC Miles Walz-Salvador Nationwide NEPA/NHPA Manager NEPA.NHPA@TheLotisGroup.com Enclosures Page 260 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 543 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila Advisory Council On Historic Preservation (ACHP) Delegation of Authority for the Section 106 Review of Telecommunication Projects Page 261 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 544 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila Page 262 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 545 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) VB BTS, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC US-FL-7040 - Senor Tequila Page 263 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 546 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 264 of 3233.E.bPacket Pg. 547Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Page 265 of 3233.E.bPacket Pg. 548Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Page 266 of 3233.E.bPacket Pg. 549Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Page 267 of 3233.E.bPacket Pg. 550Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge 2560 39TH STREET NAPLES, FL 34117 Current Principal Place of Business: Current Mailing Address: 1928 SENEGAL DATE DR NAPLES, FL 34119 US Entity Name:PEG NAPLES, LLC DOCUMENT# L18000082117 FEI Number: 82-5059062 Certificate of Status Desired: Name and Address of Current Registered Agent: PALMESE, VINCENZO 1829 SENEGAL DATE DR NAPLES, FL 34119 US The above named entity submits this statement for the purpose of changing its registered office or registered agent, or both, in the State of Florida. SIGNATURE: Electronic Signature of Registered Agent Date Authorized Person(s) Detail : I hereby certify that the information indicated on this report or supplemental report is true and accurate and that my electronic signature shall have the same legal effect as if made under oath; that I am a managing member or manager of the limited liability company or the receiver or trustee empowered to execute this report as required by Chapter 605, Florida Statutes; and that my name appears above, or on an attachment with all other like empowered. SIGNATURE: Electronic Signature of Signing Authorized Person(s) Detail Date FILED Jan 24, 2023 Secretary of State 0868529201CC VINCENZO PALMESE PRES 01/24/2023 2023 FLORIDA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY ANNUAL REPORT No Title PRES Name PALMESE, VINCENZO Address 1829 SENEGAL DATE DR City-State-Zip: NAPLES FL 34119 Title MGR Name PALMESE, FRANCESCO Address 1821 SENEGAL DATE DR City-State-Zip: NAPLES FL 34119 Page 268 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 551 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) 750 PARK OF COMMERCE DR., STE. 200 BOCA RATON, FL 33487 Current Principal Place of Business: Current Mailing Address: 750 PARK OF COMMERCE DR., STE. 200 BOCA RATON, FL 33487 US Entity Name:VB BTS, LLC DOCUMENT# M21000006733 FEI Number: 85-3678941 Certificate of Status Desired: Name and Address of Current Registered Agent: COGENCY GLOBAL INC. 115 N. CALHOUN ST., STE. 4 TALLAHASSEE, FL 32301 US The above named entity submits this statement for the purpose of changing its registered office or registered agent, or both, in the State of Florida. SIGNATURE: Electronic Signature of Registered Agent Date Authorized Person(s) Detail : I hereby certify that the information indicated on this report or supplemental report is true and accurate and that my electronic signature shall have the same legal effect as if made under oath; that I am a managing member or manager of the limited liability company or the receiver or trustee empowered to execute this report as required by Chapter 605, Florida Statutes; and that my name appears above, or on an attachment with all other like empowered. SIGNATURE: Electronic Signature of Signing Authorized Person(s) Detail Date FILED Apr 11, 2023 Secretary of State 1576579581CC DAN MARINBERG SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT & GENERAL COUNSEL 04/11/2023 2023 FOREIGN LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY ANNUAL REPORT No Title MEMBER Name VB E1, LLC Address 750 PARK OF COMMERCE DRIVE SUITE 200 City-State-Zip: BOCA RATON FL 33487 Title SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT & GENERAL COUNSEL Name MARINBERG, DANIEL Address 750 PARK OF COMMERCE DR SUITE 200 City-State-Zip: BOCA RATON FL 33487 Page 269 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 552 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 270 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 553 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 271 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 554 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 272 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 555 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 273 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 556 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 274 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 557 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) :ƵůǇ Ϯϵ͕ ϮϬϮϮ Dƌ͘ ůůĞŶ ZƵƐƐĞůů WƌŽũĞĐƚ DĂŶĂŐĞƌ Ͳ ĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ sĞƌƚŝĐĂů ƌŝĚŐĞ Z/d͕ >> ϳϱϬ WĂƌŬ ŽĨ ŽŵŵĞƌĐĞ ƌŝǀĞ͕ ^ƵŝƚĞ ϮϬϬ ŽĐĂ ZĂƚŽŶ͕ &ůŽƌŝĚĂ ϯϯϰϴϳ ZĞ͗ &Ăůů ŽŶĞ ZĂĚŝƵƐ WƌŽƉŽƐĞĚ dĞůĞĐŽŵŵƵŶŝĐĂƚŝŽŶƐ DŽŶŽƉŽůĞ dŽǁĞƌ ʹ h^Ͳ&>ͲϳϬϰϬ ^ĞŶŽƌ dĞƋƵŝůĂ ϮϱϲϬ ϯϵ ƚŚ ^ƚƌĞĞƚ ^t͕ EĂƉůĞƐ͕ &ůŽƌŝĚĂ ϯϰϭϭϳ ĞĂƌ Dƌ͘ ůůĞŶ͗ WĞƌ ǇŽƵƌ ƌĞƋƵĞƐƚ͕ &, /ŶĨƌĂƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ ;&,Ϳ ŚĂƐ ƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĚ ƚŚŝƐ ůĞƚƚĞƌ ƚŽ ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞ ŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶ ŽŶ ƚŚĞ ƉŽƚĞŶƚŝĂů ĨĂůů ǌŽŶĞ ƌĂĚŝƵƐ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ ƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚ ŵŽŶŽƉŽůĞ ƚŽǁĞƌ ůŽĐĂƚĞĚ Ăƚ ϮϱϲϬ ϯϵ ƚŚ ^ƚƌĞĞƚ ^t ŝŶ EĂƉůĞƐ͕ &ůŽƌŝĚĂ͘ <'ZKhE dŚĞ ƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚ ƚŽǁĞƌ ǁŝůů ďĞ ŝŶƐƚĂůůĞĚ ŝŶƐŝĚĞ Ă ϳϬ Ĩƚ ǆ ϳϬ Ĩƚ ůĞĂƐĞ ĂƌĞĂ ƚŽ Ă ŚĞŝŐŚƚ ŽĨ ϭϰϱͲĨƚ ;ϭϱϬͲĨƚ ǁŝƚŚ ůŝŐŚƚŶŝŶŐ ƌŽĚͿ͘ ĐŽŶƚƌŽůůĞĚ ďƌĞĂŬĂŐĞ ƉŽŝŶƚ ǁŝůů ďĞ ĚĞƐŝŐŶĞĚ ďǇ ƚŚĞ ƚŽǁĞƌ ŵĂŶƵĨĂĐƚƵƌĞƌ ďĂƐĞĚ ŽŶ ƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĂƚŝŽŶƐ ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚ ƉĞƌ ƚŚŝƐ ůĞƚƚĞƌ͘ KƵƌ ƵŶĚĞƌƐƚĂŶĚŝŶŐ ŝƐ ƚŚĂƚ ƚŚĞ ƚŽǁĞƌ ǁŝůů ďĞ ĚĞƐŝŐŶĞĚ ďǇ Ă ƚŽǁĞƌ ŵĂŶƵĨĂĐƚƵƌĞƌ͕ ƐŽ &, ǁŝůů ŶŽƚ ďĞ ƚŚĞ ƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĂů ĞŶŐŝŶĞĞƌ ŽĨ ƌĞĐŽƌĚ ĨŽƌƚŚŝƐƉƌŽũĞĐƚ͘,ŽǁĞǀĞƌ͕ŝƚŝƐ ƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĞĚ ƚŚĂƚ ƚŚĞ ƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚ ŵŽŶŽƉŽůĞ ƚŽǁĞƌ ďĞ ĚĞƐŝŐŶĞĚ ĨŽƌ ĨŽƵƌ ƚŽƚĂů ǁŝƌĞůĞƐƐ ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝĐĂƚŝŽŶƐ ĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐ ŽĨ ƐŝŵŝůĂƌ ĚĞƐŝŐŶ͘ /^h^^/KE ͬ KE>h^/KE /Ŷ ƌĞǀŝĞǁŝŶŐ ƚŚĞ ŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶ ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚ ƚŚĞ ƚŽǁĞƌ ǁŝůů ďĞ ĚĞƐŝŐŶĞĚ ŝŶ ĂĐĐŽƌĚĂŶĐĞ ǁŝƚŚ E^/ͬd/ͲϮϮϮ, ^ƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĂů ^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚ ĨŽƌ ŶƚĞŶŶĂ ^ƵƉƉŽƌƚŝŶŐ ^ƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞƐ ĂŶĚ ŶƚĞŶŶĂƐ ĂŶĚ ^ŵĂůů tŝŶĚ dƵƌďŝŶĞ ^ƵƉƉŽƌƚ ^ƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞƐ ĂŶĚ &ůŽƌŝĚĂ ƵŝůĚŝŶŐ ŽĚĞ͕ ϳ ƚŚ ĚŝƚŝŽŶ ;ϮϬϮϬͿ͘ /Ŷ ŽƌĚĞƌ ĨŽƌ Ă ǁŝŶĚ ĞǀĞŶƚ ƚŽ ĐŽůůĂƉƐĞ Ă ƉƌŽƉĞƌůǇ ĚĞƐŝŐŶĞĚ͕ ĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚĞĚ͕ ĂŶĚ ŵĂŝŶƚĂŝŶĞĚ ƚŽǁĞƌ͕ ƚŚĞ ĂĐƚƵĂů ǁŝŶĚ ƐƉĞĞĚ ǁŽƵůĚ ŚĂǀĞ ƚŽ ĞǆĐĞĞĚ ƚŚĞ ĚĞƐŝŐŶ ǁŝŶĚ ƐƉĞĞĚ ďǇ ĂŶ ĂŵŽƵŶƚ ƚŚĂƚ ŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐ ƚŚĞ ůŽĂĚ ĂŶĚ ĚĞƐŝŐŶ ĨĂĐƚŽƌƐ ƚŚĂƚ ĂƌĞ ďƵŝůƚ ŝŶƚŽ ƚŚĞ ƚŽǁĞƌ ĚĞƐŝŐŶ͘ /Ĩ ƚŚŝƐ ƵŶůŝŬĞůǇ ĞǀĞŶƚ ǁĞƌĞ ƚŽ ŽĐĐƵƌ͕ ǁĞ ƵŶĚĞƌƐƚĂŶĚ ƚŚĂƚ ŝƚ ǁŽƵůĚ ďĞ ƉƌĞĨĞƌƌĞĚ ƚŚĂƚ ŶŽ ƉĂƌƚ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ ƚŽǁĞƌ ĨĂůů ďĞǇŽŶĚ ϳϮͲĨĞĞƚ ĨƌŽŵ ƚŚĞ ƚŽǁĞƌ ŝŶ ŽƌĚĞƌ ƚŽ ƐƚĂǇ ǁŝƚŚŝŶ ƚŚĞ ƉƌŽƉĞƌƚǇ ďŽƵŶĚĂƌŝĞƐ ǁŝƚŚŝŶ ǁŚŝĐŚ ƚŚĞ ƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚ ŵŽŶŽƉŽůĞ ƚŽǁĞƌ ŝƐ ůŽĐĂƚĞĚ͘ WĞƌ ƚŚĞ ƐĞƚďĂĐŬ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ƐĞƚ ĨŽƌƚŚ ďǇ ŽůůŝĞƌ ŽƵŶƚǇ͕ ƚŚĞ ĨĂůů ǌŽŶĞ ƐŚĂůů ďĞ ĞŶƚŝƌĞůǇ ǁŝƚŚŝŶ ƚŚĞ ďŽƵŶĚĂƌŝĞƐ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ ƉƌŽƉĞƌƚǇ ŽǁŶĞĚ ďǇ ƚŚĞ ŽǁŶĞƌ ŽŶ ǁŚŝĐŚ ƚŚĞ ǁŝƌĞůĞƐƐ ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝĐĂƚŝŽŶƐ ĨĂĐŝůŝƚǇ Žƌ ƚŽǁĞƌ Page 275 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 558 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) &Ăůů ŽŶĞ ZĂĚŝƵƐ ʹ h^Ͳ&>ͲϳϬϰϬ :ƵůǇ Ϯϵ͕ ϮϬϮϮ WĂŐĞ Ϯ ŽĨϮ ŝƐ ůŽĐĂƚĞĚ͘ dŚĞƌĞĨŽƌĞ͕ ǁĞ ƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚ ƚŚĂƚ ƚŚĞƚŽǁĞƌĂŶĚĨŽƵŶĚĂƚŝŽŶƐǇƐƚĞŵďĞĚĞƐŝŐŶĞĚǁŝƚŚĂǁĞĂŬ ƉŽŝŶƚ ŶŽ ŵŽƌĞ ƚŚĂŶ ϳϮͲĨĞĞƚ ďĞůŽǁ ƚŚĞ ƚŽƉ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ ůŝŐŚƚŶŝŶŐ ƌŽĚ ;ϲϳͲĨĞĞƚ ďĞůŽǁ ƚŚĞ ƚŽƉ ŽĨ ƚŽǁĞƌ ƐƚĞĞůͿ ƚŽ ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞ ƐƵĨĨŝĐŝĞŶƚ ĐůĞĂƌĂŶĐĞ ǁŝƚŚŝŶ ƚŚĞ ƉƌŽƉĞƌƚǇ ŝĨ ƚŚĞƌĞ ƐŚŽƵůĚ ďĞ Ă ĐĂƚĂƐƚƌŽƉŚŝĐ ĨĂŝůƵƌĞ͘ KƵƌ ŽƉŝŶŝŽŶ ŝƐ ďĂƐĞĚ ŽŶ Ă ƌĞǀŝĞǁ ŽĨ Ăůů ŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶ ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚ ƚŽ &,͕ ĂƐ ǁĞůů ĂƐ Ă ƌĞǀŝĞǁ ŽĨ Ăůů ĂƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞ ĐŽĚĞ ĂŶĚ ĂŶĂůǇƐŝƐ ŵĞƚŚŽĚƐ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚ ƚŽ ĨŽƌŵ ƚŚĞ ĂďŽǀĞ ĐŽŶĐůƵƐŝŽŶ͘ ^ŚŽƵůĚ ĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂů ŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶ ďĞĐŽŵĞ ĂǀĂŝůĂďůĞ͕ ǁĞ ƌĞƐĞƌǀĞ ƚŚĞ ƌŝŐŚƚ ƚŽ ĚĞƚĞƌŵŝŶĞ ĂŶǇ ƌĞƐƵůƚŝŶŐ ŝŵƉĂĐƚ ŽŶ ƚŚĞ ƚŽǁĞƌ ĂŶĚ ƚŽ ƌĞǀŝƐĞ ŽƵƌ ůĞƚƚĞƌ ĂƐ ǁĂƌƌĂŶƚĞĚ ďǇ ƚŚĞ ĚŝƐĐŽǀĞƌǇ ŽĨ ŶĞǁ ŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶ͘ dŚĂŶŬ ǇŽƵ ĨŽƌ ĂůůŽǁŝŶŐ ƵƐ ƚŽ ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞ ƚŚŝƐ ƐĞƌǀŝĐĞ͘ /Ĩ ǇŽƵ ŚĂǀĞ ĂŶǇ ƋƵĞƐƚŝŽŶƐ Žƌ ĐŽŶĐĞƌŶƐ ĂďŽƵƚ ƚŚŝƐ ƉƌŽũĞĐƚ͕ ƉůĞĂƐĞ ĐŽŶƚĂĐƚ ŵĞ Ăƚ ƉŚŽŶĞ͗ ;ϵϭϵͿ ϯϲϳͲϱϬϬϲ Žƌ ĞŵĂŝů͗:ŝŵ͘ŝůůƵƉƐΛĨĚŚͲŝƐ͘ĐŽŵ ͘ ZĞƐƉĞĐƚĨƵůůǇ ƐƵďŵŝƚƚĞĚ͕ &, /ŶĨƌĂƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ͕ >> ZĞǀŝĞǁ Ǉ͗ :ĂŵĞƐ Z͘ ŝůůƵƉƐ͕ W ;EͿ͕ &D ĞŶŶŝƐ ͘ ďĞů͕ W ŝƌĞĐƚŽƌ ʹ ŝǀŝů ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ ŚŝĞĨ ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌ &> W >ŝĐĞŶƐĞ EŽ͘ϲϮϳϱϬ Page 276 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 559 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 277 of 3233.E.bPacket Pg. 560Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Page 278 of 3233.E.bPacket Pg. 561Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Page 279 of 3233.E.bPacket Pg. 562Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Page 280 of 3233.E.bPacket Pg. 563Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Page 281 of 3233.E.bPacket Pg. 564Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Page 282 of 3233.E.bPacket Pg. 565Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Page 283 of 3233.E.bPacket Pg. 566Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Page 284 of 3233.E.bPacket Pg. 567Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Page 285 of 3233.E.bPacket Pg. 568Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Page 286 of 3233.E.bPacket Pg. 569Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Page 287 of 3233.E.bPacket Pg. 570Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Page 288 of 3233.E.bPacket Pg. 571Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Page 289 of 3233.E.bPacket Pg. 572Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Page 290 of 3233.E.bPacket Pg. 573Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Page 291 of 3233.E.bPacket Pg. 574Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Page 292 of 3233.E.bPacket Pg. 575Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Page 293 of 3233.E.bPacket Pg. 576Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Page 294 of 3233.E.bPacket Pg. 577Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Page 295 of 3233.E.bPacket Pg. 578Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Page 296 of 3233.E.bPacket Pg. 579Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Page 297 of 3233.E.bPacket Pg. 580Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Page 298 of 3233.E.bPacket Pg. 581Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Page 299 of 3233.E.bPacket Pg. 582Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Page 300 of 3233.E.bPacket Pg. 583Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Page 301 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 584 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 302 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 585 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 303 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 586 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 304 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 587 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 305 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 588 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 306 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 589 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 307 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 590 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 308 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 591 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 309 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 592 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 310 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 593 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) 6NC2102A SenorTequila WirelessTelecommunicationFacility RadioFrequency(RF)EngineeringReport LastUpdated07/27/22 RevisionNumberV2.0 Page 311 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 594 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) RF Engineering Review 1 TableofContents ISearchRingArea.........................................................................................................................................................................................1 II5GCoverageImprovements.....................................................................................................................................................................4 IIICertificationStatementofNonͲinterference..........................................................................................................................................6 AppendixA:TͲMobileNetworkCapacityConsiderations–GoldenGate...................................................................................................7 Page 312 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 595 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) RF Engineering Review 2 IͲSearchRingArea StatementofNeed TocomplywithFCCguidelinesasdefinedinthe CodeofFederalRegulationsTitle47,TͲMobileisdeploying5G servicesnationwide.Currently,4Gserviceislargelyprovided inGoldenGateandenvironsbyatowerwithTͲMobile antennasatoneͲhundredͲtwentyͲsixfeetelevation.Itisa flagpoledesignlocatedat11935CollierBlvdintheCollier Plazaandutilizescanisterstoenclosealloftheequipmenton thetower.AsecondflagpoledesignedtowerneartheGolden GatePkwyandCoronadoPkwyintersectioncomplementsthe 4Gcoveragehere.Inbothcasesthedesignoftheenclosures isnotcompatiblewithdeploymentofmostadvanced4Gand 5Gservices.Inparticular,thediameteroftheenclosuresisnot sufficienttohousetheantennasandradiosandthereisno activeorpassivecooling. Notunlikeanighttimedriverwhoencounterspartof aroadwhereastreetlampisoutofserviceorabsent,acell phoneuserwouldexperienceless"illumination"whennot nearacelltower.Thenighttimedriverwouldthenexperience amoreilluminatedpassagewhiletransitioningintothenext streetlamp's"footprint"orcoverage.Inthatsensethebest waytoprovidecontiguouscoverageinanetwork(oflight polesorcellphonetowersforinstance)wouldbetoadda newfacility,orsite,atthelessilluminatedlocation. Twocriticalcomponentsofcellularnetwork coveragearetheheightoftheantennasabovegroundlevel andthelocationofthesite.Theantennaelevationgenerally determinesthecoveragefootprintorphysicalareawherea siteprovidesservice.(atallertowerprovidesmorerangethanashortertower)Thelocationisimportantforafewreasons.Anewsitemustbeproposedin anareawhereitwillimprovetheexistingservicelevels.Thelocationofanewsitemustalsomeetcertainrequirementsrelatedtothelocationofthe existingTͲMobilefacilities,ortowers.Thisisacontributingfactorwhendevelopingsearchradiiasthecoveragefootprintsofthe“neighbor”sitesactasa constraintontheextentofanewfacility’spotentiallocation. Withtheadventof5G,networkgrowthwilltendtodensify.Thismeansadding"fillͲin"sitesthatcanofferbetter"gradesofservice"(GOS).Making avoicecallinanareawithpoorcoverageorthatiscapacitychallengedmayworkbuthigherbandwidthapplicationssuchaswebusageorvideomaynot. Sendingatextuseslessnetworkresourcesthanmappingdirectionsonasmartphone.Considerationmustalsobemadeforfutureapplicationsas5Gservice matures. Q:Whatis5G? A:5Gisthe5thgenerationmobilenetwork.Itisanewglobalwirelessstandardafter1G,2G,3G,and4Gnetworks.5Genablesanewkind ofnetworkthatisdesignedtoconnectvirtuallyeveryoneandeverythingtogetherincludingmachines,objects,anddevices.5Gwireless technologyismeanttodeliverhighermultiͲGbpspeakdataspeeds,ultralowlatency,morereliability,massivenetworkcapacity,increased availability,andamoreuniformuserexperiencetomoreusers.Higherperformanceandimprovedefficiencyempowernewuserexperiencesand connectsnewindustries.https://www.qualcomm.com/5g/whatͲisͲ5g?&cmpid=fo5gus222&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIwLqmjJrqͲAIVYQh9Ch1eSg0PEAAYAiAAEgJd5fD_BwE (Qualcomm,Incisoneoftheleadingdevelopersof5Gtechnologies.) Inordertoutilizethefullsuiteof5Gservices,equipmentspecificationsforthesetechnologiesrequirestheinstallationofradiotransceiversor “radios”,incloseproximitytotheantennas. •thetransmit/receivecomponentsarephysicallypartoftheantennaforsome5Gantennas •5Gantennasandtransceiverswillnotphysicallyfitinmostenclosedunipoleandflagpoletowersatelevation x 5Gdeploymentonatowerrequiresafull“array”ormountingplatformthatcansupportandallowequitablespacingoftheequipment. x 5Gequipmentissusceptibletooverheatinginenclosedunipoleandflagpoletowersthatdonothaveactiveorpassivecooling Page 313 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 596 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) RF Engineering Review 3 TͲMobilelocalengineeringrequestedfundingforserviceimprovementsinGoldenGateand surroundingareasmorethantenyearsago.Initially,thefocuswasnorthofthecityduetothedistance betweentheexistingsitesatthetime.Theamountofcellphoneusagehasincreaseddramatically sincethattimeandnetworkdensificationbecameamoreimportantaspectofnetworkplanning.This isreflectedinthesearchringareasizeandlocationasitdefinesatargetzonewhereanewfacility wouldmeetnetworkcoverageandcapacityneeds. Infigure1,amapoffutureandcurrentTͲMobilefacilitiesisshown.Colorcodesindicate statusofeachofthefacilities.BlueandgreenrepresentoperationalTͲMobilefacilitieswhileyellow andorangerepresentfuture5Gfacilities.(twotowersthatwillundergo5Gupgradesandtwotowers thatareplanned).Thesearchringisrepresentedbyablueoval,roughly1.2sqmiinareawithan averageradiusof.75mi.BothofthefacilitieswithinthecityofGoldenGateareflagpoletypedesignsandcannotsupportafullantennaarrayfor5G equipment. TowersregisteredwiththeFCCareindicatedbysmallerredcircles.Withinthesearchringradius,therearenoexistingstructuresofsufficient heightorthatcanbeupgradedtomeettherequirementsforadvanced5Gservices. Figure2correspondstotable2anddisplaysasixͲmileradiusaroundtheproposedlocation.Thisareacoversmultiple“tiers”ofexistingTͲMobile towersanddoesnotconstitutearealistictargetforserviceimprovements.NoneofthetowersindicatedonthemapliewithintheTͲMobilesearchringand thereforeareineligibleforconsideration. Page 314 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 597 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) RF Engineering Review 4 IIͲ5GCoverageImprovements InGoldenGatethereisasignificant5Gcoverage deficiency.Usersarenotabletoconnecttoadvanced5G servicesinmostplaces.Thereasonforthisisthatthe towersthatare5Gcompatiblearetoofarfromthemain residentialandcommercialareasofGoldenGate.Thereare notowerswithintheserviceareathatcanbeupgradedto thelatestequipmenttechnologies. Computermodelsareusedtodisplaycurrentand predictedcoverage.InFig3,thecurrent5Gsignallevelsare indicatedbyshadesofcolor.Greenareashavethemost reliableservice.Twonewtowerspendingconstructionare addedtothenetworkanalysisasdepictedinFig4.Bothof theseplannedfacilitieshavebeenpartofTͲMobile’slong termeffortstoboostnetworkreliability. Thenewproposedtowerwouldsignificantly contributetothegoalofubiquitous5Gthroughoutthearea. (Fig5) Additionalfacilitiesarerequiredtomeetthe growingdemandforadvancedservices.Asthe4Gnetwork eventuallybecomesasomewhatcongestedhighway,5Gis themanylanedextensiontorelievethe“traffic”. Page 315 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 598 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) RF Engineering Review 5 Page 316 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 599 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) RF Engineering Review 6 IIIͲCertificationStatementofNonͲinterference ThisletterprovidesinformationabouttheproposedTͲMobiletransceivingequipmentonanadditiontoanexistingfacilityinNaples,FLandits potentialinterferencewithcommunicationfacilitieslocatednearby;aswellastheFCCrulesgoverningthehumanexposuretoradiofrequencyenergy(OET 65guidelines).TͲMobileshallcomplywithallFCCrulesregardinginterferencetootherradioservicesandTͲMobileshallcomplywithallFCCrulesregarding humanexposuretoradiofrequencyenergy.Theproposedmonopoletower,andreceptionandtransmissionfunctionswillnotinterferewiththevisualand customarytransmissionorreceptionofradio,televisionorsimilarservicesaswellasotherwirelessservicesenjoyedbysurroundingproperties. TheFederalCommunicationCommission(FCC)hasallocatedthesefrequenciesexclusivelyforusebycellularserviceproviders.Eachcellular serviceproviderisassignedspecificfrequencies(channels)onwhichtotransmitandreceiveradiosignals. CellulartransmittersmustbetypeͲacceptedbytheFCCtoensurecompliancewithtechnicalstandardsthatlimitthefrequencies,outputpower, radiofrequencyemissions,spuriousradionoiseandothertechnicalparameters.CellularlicenseeslikeTͲMobileownsarerequiredtousetypeͲaccepted equipment.TheassignmentoffrequenciesandFCCruleskeepcellularradiosignalsfrominterferingwithorbeinginterferedwithbyotherradio transmissionsandprovideguidelinesoutliningthelimitsforpermissiblehumanRFexposure.Intheeventofacomplaintofinterferenceorotherconcerns aboutcellularantennafacilities,theFCChasaresolutionprocesstodeterminethesourceofinterferenceandwhetherafacilityisincompliancewithFCC rules. IntheeventofinterferenceorotherknownissueswiththetransmissionfacilitycontactwiththeTͲMobileNetworkOperationsCenter(NOC)can beestablished24hoursaday,7daysaweek365/366daysperyearatthefollowingnumbers:(877)611Ͳ5868(DAY),(877)611Ͳ5868(NIGHT) Name_PatrickKeane_________Title__TͲMobileSrEngineer,RadioFrequency_________ Signature__________________ Page 317 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 600 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) RF Engineering Review 7 AppendixA:TͲMobileNetworkCapacityConsiderations–GoldenGate Alongwithcomputermodelling,realworldmeasurementsareusedforplanningandoptimizationofcellularnetworks.Mapsareplottedusing GraphicalInformationSystems(GIS)andnetworkinformation.Anexampleofthistypeofdataarethenextfourfigures.Inthisexample,amonthly aggregateofsignalmeasurementsreportedbacktotheTͲMobilenetworkbytheusers’cellphonesismapped.Thelefthandmaprepresentsthesignal levelthatamobilephoneismeasuringatthatlocation.Therighthandsideisa“heatmap”representingtheusage,orhowmanyusersareconnectingto thenetwork.(oftenreferredtoas“traffic”)Withinthewhitepolygonsareareaswiththemostreliableservice.FiguresA1andA2arecreatedusing4Gdata andofferasignificantcontrastwiththe5Gdata.(figs.A3,A4) Whilethe4GservicehasrelativelygoodsignallevelsinmostofGoldenGateandconnectingroads(figA1)areliable5Gsignal(figA3)andtraffic (figA4)ismostlylimitedtonearbythe5Gtower. Page 318 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 601 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) RF Engineering Review 8 Alongwithnetworkcoverage,planningforboth neartermandlongͲtermcapacityneedsaretakeninto account.Torevisitthestreetlampanalogy,wecanconsider thateachtowercastsacoverage“footprint”orareawhere itisthedominant“server”.Acellphonewithinatower’s footprintwillconnecttothattowerforcommunications.In GoldenGatetherearetwotowersthatprovidethemajority of5Gservice.AoneͲhundredͲsixtyͲfivefootmonopole towernearthePineRidgeRdandIͲ75intersectionwithTͲ MobileantennasatoneͲhundredͲtwentyfeet(6NC1052A) andaoneͲhundredͲeightyfootselfͲsupporttowernearthe CollierBlvdandIͲ75intersectionwithTͲMobileantennasat oneͲhundredͲthirtyͲeightfeet(6NC1011A).Bothcoverage footprintsarehighlightedbycolorsincontrasttothegreen overall5Gservicefootprints.(figA5)Notethatthecoverage footprintforbothofthetowersextendsafewmilesintothe GoldenGatecommunity.Ifwecomparethoselocationsto Fig3andFigA4inthisreportitisapparentthatthe5G signallevelsatthosedistancesareverypoor.Theresultof thisisthatacellphoneuserintheseareasmaybeableto access5GbutatalowerGOS–notabletoutilizethefull spectrumofcapabilities. Amajorgoalofnetworkplanningistoachievea balancebetweencoverageandcapacityneeds.Onemethod employedistheconceptoftrafficoffload,orreducingthe amountofcellulartrafficthataparticulartoweris processing.Byaddingfacilitiestothenetwork,better distributionofcellulartrafficcanbeaccomplished. AftertwonewplannedTͲMobilefacilitiesbecome operational,thefuture5GcoveragefootprintsareshowninfigureA6.(Forpurposesofthisreport,thisisreferredtoasPlanningScenario1)Thesearealso highlightedbycolorsincontrasttothegreenoverall5Gservicefootprints.Currentlytherearetwo5GfacilitiesinproximitytoGoldenGate.Afterthe additionofthenewtowers,foursiteswillcoverthesamearea.Thisisbothimportantforredundancyandcapacity.Ifthereisanoutage,ornaturaldisaster (likeahurricane)havingmultiplefacilitiesintheareaincreasestheprobabilitythattherewillbeservice.Fromacapacitystandpoint,havingmorefacilities sharesthetrafficload,whichresultsinbetterGOSfortheuser. Ofnoteisthattheradiiofthetwooriginalservingtowershavebeensignificantlyreduced.Theoutcomeofasmallerfootprintislesscellulartraffic. Thisistheconceptof“offload”.Theareasthatwillbecomecoveredbythenewfacilities(theoffloadareas)arehighlightedinfigureA7forPlanningScenario 1.AsimilarapproachcanbeutilizedforPlanningScenario2displayedinfigureA8.Anaccompanyingmapshowsthefinaloffloadareasforthisscenarioin figureA9.Calculationstodeterminethechangesinthephysicalcharacteristicsofthecoveragefootprintsarestraightforward.(Table1)Thisishelpfulwhen gaugingtheappropriatenessofantennaheightsandlocations. Page 319 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 602 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) RF Engineering Review 9 Page 320 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 603 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) RF Engineering Review 10 Networkcapacityplanningisacomplicatedprocesswithanumberofconsiderationsincludingexistingandprojectedcellulartraffic,financial constraints,developmentchallengesandstrategicgoals.Fordemonstrationpurposes,thestaticexercisepresentedinthisreportisasimplifiedtechnical descriptionofpredictedradiocoverageanditsimpactonlocalareanetworkcapacity.Itshouldnotbeconsideredacomprehensiveengineeringapproach tonetworkplanning. TheoffloadareasforbothscenariosaredepictedinfiguresA10andA11.Inbothplots,networktrafficisrepresentedbyclustersofcoloreddots. EachlocationisageoͲcoded,aggregatedmeasurementrecordedbythenetwork.Thedarkercoloredclusterscorrespondtocellulartrafficmeasurements thatwillbeoffloadedwhenthenewsitesareintroduced.SimplifiedoffloadcalculationsareshowninTable2. Page 321 of 323 3.E.b Packet Pg. 604 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) Page 322 of 3233.E.bPacket Pg. 605Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Page 323 of 3233.E.bPacket Pg. 606Attachment: Attachment 1 - Applicant Backup Documents dl (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge 3.E.c Packet Pg. 607 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Legal Ad and Sign Posting (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) SIGN POSTING INS TRUCTIONS (CHAPTER 8, COLLIER COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT) A zoning sign(s) must be posted by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent on the parcel for a minimum of fifteen (15) calendar days in advance of the first public hearing and said sign(s) must be maintained by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent through the Board of County Commissioners Hearing. Below are general guidelines for signs, however these guidelines should not be construed to supersede any requirement of the LDC. For specific sign requirements, please refer to the Administrative Code, Chapter 8 E. 1.The sign(s) must be erected in full view of the public, not more than five (5) feet from the nearest street right-of-way or easement. 2.The sign(s) must be securely affixed by nails, staples, \or other means to a wood frame or to a wood panel and then fastenedsecurely to a post, or other structure. The sign may not e affixed to a tree or other foliage. 3.The petitioner or the petitioner's agent must maintain t e sign(s) in place, and readable condition until the requested actionhas been heard and a final decision rendered. If the sig s) is destroyed, lost, or rendered unreadable, the petitioner or the petitioner's agent must replace the sign(s NOTE: AFTER THE SIGN HAS BEEN POSTED, T IS AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE SHOULD BE RETURNED NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORKING YS BEFORE THE FIRST HEARING DATE TO THE ASSIGNED PLANNER. STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER BEFORE TH ERSIGNED AUTHORITY, PERSONAL WHO ON Mattaniah S Jahn NAME (TYPED OR PRINTED) -/1. STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER PEARED Mattaniah S Jahn NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 10.03.00 OF THE THE PARCEL COVERED TN PETITION NUMBER 935 Main Street Suite C4 STREET OR P.O. BOX Safety Harbor, FL 34695 CITY, STATE ZIP The foregoing instrument was sworn to and subscribed before me this __ 2_8_t_h __ day of November 2oll, by />1 •ft I\-'•'>"\ S J Q'\,.J �sonally kno�to me or who produced as identification and who did/did not take an oath. My Commission Expires: (Stamp with serial number) Rev. 3/4/2015 Sheridan G Murphy Printed Name of Notary Public 3.E.c Packet Pg. 608 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Legal Ad and Sign Posting (27320 : PL20220003012 Vertical Bridge Variance) 3.E.c Packet Pg. 609 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Legal Ad and Sign Posting (27320 : 3.E.c Packet Pg. 610 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Legal Ad and Sign Posting (27320 :