The URL can be used to link to this page

Agenda 12/12/2023 Item # 9B (Ordinance - Amending the GM Plan to change the designation of property from Estates - mixed use District to allow a self-storage and mini warehousing)9.B 12/ 12/2023 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending the Collier County Growth Management Plan to change the designation of property from Estates -Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict to the Estates -Commercial District, 13th Ave SW Commercial Infill Subdistrict within Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element to allow up to 171,500 square feet of gross floor area of self -storage and mini -warehousing (SIC 4225). The subject property, consisting of 5.53f acres, is located southwest of the intersection of 13th Avenue SW and Collier Boulevard, north of Green Boulevard in Section 15, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. [PL20220000289] (This is a companion to item 9C) OBJECTIVE: To have the Board of County Commissioners (Board) approve (adopt) the proposed small-scale amendment to the Growth Management Plan (GMP) and approve said amendment for transmittal to the Florida Department of Commerce. CONSIDERATIONS: This item was continued from the October 10, 2023, Board meeting at the request of the applicant to provide time to meet with surrounding neighbors to attempt to reach an agreeable, lower intensity (square footage) for the self -storage facility. As of November 29, 2023, staff has not received any documents pertaining to these negotiations from the applicant. Staff anticipates the applicant will verbally update the BCC on the outcome of the negotiations at the Hearing. The petition seeks to amend the Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP), specifically to create a new subdistrict, the 13th Ave SW Commercial Infill Subdistrict, to allow for 171,500 square feet of gross floor area of mini and self -storage (SIC 4225). As reflected in support documents and Planning Commission Staff Report, the petition was submitted requesting 174,000 square feet of gross floor area; the request was reduced to 171,500 square feet subsequent to the Planning Commission meeting, based on Applicant's meetings with the surrounding neighbors and Transportation Planning staff. The subject f5.53-acre site is zoned Estates and consists of two parcels. The northern parcel is f2.77 acres and was developed with a single-family home (former model home sales center built by American Dream Builders, Inc.). At the same time, the southern property is f2.77 acres and undeveloped. Existing land uses in the surrounding area include the Florida Power & Light facility (generally developed with a substation, transmission, and distribution lines, vehicle and equipment storage, fueling facilities, and customer service center) immediately to the south and west and residential development to the north and east, across 13th Avenue Southwest and Collier Boulevard, respectively. Per Chapter 163.3187, Part II, Florida Statutes, limitations are in place for this type of small-scale amendment, as identified below, followed by staff comments [italicized in brackets]. Process for adoption of small-scale comprehensive plan amendment. (1) A small-scale development amendment may be adopted under the following conditions: (a) The proposed amendment involves a use of 50 acres or fewer. [The amendment pertains to a property consisting of f5.53 acres.] (b) The proposed amendment does not involve a text change to the local government's comprehensive plan's goals, policies, and objectives. Still, it only proposes a land use change to the future land use map for a site -specific small-scale development activity. However, text changes that relate directly to and are adopted simultaneously with the small-scale future land use map amendment shall be permissible under this section. [This amendment involves a site -specific text and map location.] (c) The property that is the subject of the proposed amendment is not located within an area of critical state concern unless the project subject to the proposed amendment involves the construction of affordable housing units meeting the criteria of s. 420.0004 (3) and is located within an area of critical state concern designated by s. 380.0552 or by the Administration Commission pursuant to s. 380.05 (1). [The Packet Pg. 215 9.B 12/ 12/2023 subject property is not within an Area of Critical State Concern.] (d) Comprehensive plans may only be amended in such a way as to preserve the internal consistency of the plan pursuant to s. 163.3177. [The amendment preserves the internal consistency between and among GMP elements.] FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: Based on a review of this petition, including the supporting data and analysis, staff makes the following findings and conclusions. More analysis is available in the Staff Report provided to the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC). • The 13th Ave SW Commercial Infill Subdistrict petition proposes an amendment to a small-scale Growth Management Plan to create a subdistrict in the Estates Mixed Use District for 171,500 square feet of mini and self -storage. • Transportation Planning Staff recommends approval of the proposed GMPA as submitted and with access -specific conditions for the companion PUD rezone (please see companion PUD rezone petition for specific conditions). • There are no adverse environmental impacts as a result of this petition. • No historical or archaeological sites are affected by this amendment. • There are no concerns about impacts on other public infrastructure. • There is a demonstrated need for the proposed use. • The site's use will create minimal impact on the surrounding area. FISCAL IMPACT: Petition fees account for staff review time and materials and the cost of associated legal advertising/public notice for the public hearings. Therefore, no fiscal impacts to Collier County result from adopting this amendment. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Adopting the proposed amendment by the Board and its transmittal to the Florida Department of Commerce will commence the Department's (30) thirty -day challenge period for any affected person. Provided the small-scale amendment is not challenged, it becomes effective (31) thirty-one days after Board adoption. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This Growth Management Plan (GMP) amendment is authorized and subject to the procedures established in Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes, The Community Planning Act, and Collier County Resolution No. 12-234, as amended. The Board should consider the following criteria in making its decision: "plan amendments shall be based on relevant and appropriate data and an analysis by the local government that may include but not be limited to, surveys, studies, community goals and vision, and other data available at the time of adoption of the plan amendment. To be based on data means to react to it appropriately and to the extent necessary indicated by the data available on that particular subject at the time of adoption of the plan or plan amendment at issue." 163.3177(1)(f), F.S. In addition, s. 163.3177(6)(a)2, F.S. provides that Future Land Use Element (FLUE) plan amendments shall be based on surveys, studies, and data regarding the area, as applicable, including: a. The amount of land required to accommodate anticipated growth. b. The projected permanent and seasonal population of the area. c. The character of undeveloped land. d. The availability of water supplies, public facilities, and services. e. The need for redevelopment, including the renewal of blighted areas and the elimination of f. non -conforming uses inconsistent with the community's character. g. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to or closely proximate to military installations. h. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to an airport as defined in s. 330.35 and i. consistent with s. 333.02. j. The need to modify land uses and development patterns with antiquated subdivisions. k. The discouragement of urban sprawl. 1. The need for job creation, capital investment, and economic development that will strengthen and Packet Pg. 216 12/ 12/2023 9.B diversify the community's economy. FLUE map amendments shall also be based upon the following analysis per Section 163.3177(6)(a)8.: a. An analysis of the availability of facilities and services. b. An analysis of the suitability of the plan amendment for its proposed use considering the character of the undeveloped land, soils, topography, natural resources, and historic resources on site. c. An analysis of the minimum amount of land needed to achieve the goals and requirements of this section. This item is approved as to form and legality. It requires an affirmative vote of four for approval because this is an Adoption hearing of the GMP Amendment. (HFAC) STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION: To forward petition PL20220000289 13th Ave SW Commercial Infill Subdistrict GMPA to the Board with a recommendation to approve, adopt, and transmit to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity [now Florida Department of Commerce] and other statutorily required agencies. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: This petition was heard at the May 18, 2023, CCPC Meeting. There was high public opposition to the project, with concerns including the safety of proposed access, traffic, and compatibility of the use with the surrounding neighborhood. The following conditions of approval were proposed for the companion PUD by the CCPC: 1) business for the facility would be done exclusively with consumers; 2) reasonable business practices would be undertaken to prevent business or residential uses of the storage spaces and 3) as offered by the applicant, the applicant will construct and maintain, at the applicant's expense, a bus stop with gravel parking outside of the right-of-way. The CCPC vote was split 3/3, with Commissioners Shea, Sparrazza, and Schumacher dissenting, finding no benefit to the County or the community to justify changing the GMP. Commissioners Fryer, Klucik, and Schmidt voted to recommend approval. RECOMMENDATION: To adopt and transmit petition PL20220000289 to the Florida Department of Commerce and other statutorily required agencies and to approve the reduction in the square footage to 171,500 in the Ordinance title. Prepared by: Rachel Hansen, Planner III, Zoning Division ATTACHMENT(S) 1. Attachment 1 - CCPC Staff Report (PDF) 2. Attachment 2 - Ordinance - 092023_Rev(PDF) 3. Attachment 3 - NIM Documents (PDF) 4. [Linked] Attachment 4 - Applicant's Backup Documentation (PDF) 5. [Linked] Attachment 5 - Public Correspondence through 8-21-23 (PDF) 6. Attachment 6 - Public Notice Sign and Affidavit (PDF) 7. Attachment 7 - Updated Self -Storage Market Study (PDF) 8. legal ad - agenda IDs 27180 & 27206 (PDF) Packet Pg. 217 9.B 12/12/2023 COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners Item Number: 9.13 Doc ID: 27180 Item Summary: Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending the Collier County Growth Management Plan to change the designation of property from Estates -Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict to the Estates -Commercial District, 13th Ave SW Commercial Infill Subdistrict within Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub - Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element to allow up to 171,500 square feet of gross floor area of self -storage and mini -warehousing (SIC 4225). The subject property, consisting of 5.53f acres, is located southwest of the intersection of 13th Avenue SW and Collier Boulevard, north of Green Boulevard in Section 15, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. [PL20220000289] (This is a companion to item 9C) Meeting Date: 12/12/2023 Prepared by: Title: — Zoning Name: Rachel Hansen 11/07/2023 2:46 PM Submitted by: Title: Zoning Director — Zoning Name: Mike Bost 11/07/2023 2:46 PM Approved By: Review: Zoning James Sabo Additional Reviewer Growth Management Community Development Department Diane Lynch Zoning Mike Bosi Division Director Growth Management Community Development Department James C French Office of Management and Budget Office of Management and Budget County Attorney's Office County Attorney's Office County Manager's Office Board of County Commissioners Debra Windsor Level 3 OMB Gatekeeper Review Laura Zautcke Additional Reviewer Heidi Ashton-Cicko Level 2 Attorney of Record Review Jeffrey A. Klatzkow Level 3 County Attorney's Office Review Amy Patterson Level 4 County Manager Review Geoffrey Willig Meeting Pending Completed 11/08/2023 5:24 PM Additional Reviewer Completed 11/09/2023 4:10 PM Completed 11/15/2023 9:25 AM Growth Management Completed 11/29/2023 6:08 PM Completed 11/30/2023 8:33 AM Completed 11/30/2023 11:37 AM Completed 12/01/2023 2:33 PM Completed 12/04/2023 10:17 AM Completed 12/06/2023 3:19 PM 12/12/2023 9:00 AM Packet Pg. 218 9.B.1 PL20230000289 C7�3V�4o-r Corti-tty --. ,ram STAFF REPORT COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT, ZONING DIVISION, COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING SECTION HEARING DATE: APRIL 20, 2023 SUBJECT: PL20220000289 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT (GMPA); 13T" AVE SW COMMERCIAL INFILL SUBDISTRICT (ADOPTION HEARING) COMPANION TO: PL20210003321 4050 13T" AVE COMMERCIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (CPUD) ELEMENTS: GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN — URBAN GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SUB -ELEMENT AGENT/APPLICANT: Agent: Patrick Vanasse, AICP RWA, Inc 6610 Willow Park Naples, FL 34109 Owner: 4050 13th Ave, LLC 3501 Boxwood Way Naples, FL 34116 Applicant: Greg O'Herren Shamrock Builders 9800 Westpoint Dr Suite 200 Indianapolis, IN 46256 GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The ±5.53-acre subject property consists of two parcels and is in the southwest quadrant of the intersection of Collier Boulevard and 13th Avenue SW, approximately ±0.50 miles north of Golden Gate City in Section 15, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. The subject site is approximately ±0.20 miles north of the existing Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict. 1 Packet Pg. 219 9.B.1 oinnnonnnnnon in L. 71AVIESW > 7th AVFtil1 sn m o } � a U Pioe R' ►►hite HLVD 111haV"SW l[AAY S►V PROJECT LOCATION 31h,u'Esw 131WES'A 15th .WV ►► lith Al L 1►' rt L D e ►{ R 171h ANT SW CIR as foKton LN 60 14t ►F- 'W wz,o��p st,►►1 SN' Location Map n 6 w 0 "e FJ � 7Sth AVE SW arm LOCATION m 4 r Pub 4 a u ass 1 Sth AVE SW CPuo y ,. , ' U� u �RMF-12 Zoning Map r- a INJ Packet Pg. 220 9.B.1 PL20230000289 REQUESTED ACTION: The applicant proposes a small-scale Comprehensive Plan amendment to the Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP), specifically to create a new subdistrict, the 4050 13th Ave SW Commercial Infill Subdistrict. The applicant also proposes to amend the Urban Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map (FLUM) and create a new map ("13th Ave SW Commercial Infill Subdistrict") in the FLUM series of the GGAMP, to identify the newly created Subdistrict. The proposed Growth Management Plan (GMP) amendment is attached as Exhibit "A". PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: To re -designate the property from the Residential Estates Subdistrict to the 4050 13th Ave SW Infill Subdistrict in the Estates Mixed Use District, to allow for 174,000 square feet of gross floor area of mini and self -storage (SIC 4225). A companion petition (PL20210003321) would rezone the property from Estates (E) zoning district to a Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD). EXISTING CONDITIONS: Subject Property: The subject ±5.53-acre site is zoned Estates and consists of two parcels. The northern parcel is ±2.77 acres and was developed with a single-family home (former model home sales center built by American Dream Builders, Inc.), while the southern parcel is ±2.77 acres and undeveloped. The entire subject property is designated Estates Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict as identified on the Urban Golden Gate Estates FLUM. Surrounding Lands: North: Future Land Use Designation; Residential Estates Subdistrict. Zoned; Estates. Land Use; Single -Family Residential (across 13m Avenue Southwest). East: Future Land Use Designation; Residential Estates Subdistrict. Zoned; Estates. Land Use; Single -Family Residential (across Collier Boulevard). South: Future Land Use Designation; Residential Estates Subdistrict. Zoned; Florida Power & Light PUD. Land Use; Florida Power & Light substation. West: Future Land Use Designation; Residential Estates Subdistrict. Zoned; Florida Power & Light PUD. Land Use; Florida Power & Light substation. In summary, the existing land uses in the surrounding area include the Florida Power & Light facility (generally developed with a substation, transmission and distribution lines, vehicle and equipment storage, fueling facilities, and customer service center) immediately to the south and west, and residential development to the north and east, across 13' Avenue Southwest and Collier Boulevard, respectively. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS: Background and Considerations: The Urban Sub -Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) currently designates this property as Estates Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict. This designation is characterized by low density, semi -rural residential lots with limited opportunities for other land uses. Locational criteria limiting commercial and conditional use development in the Estates designation were established with the adoption of the GGAMP in the Growth Management Plan in 1991. The recent GGAMP restudy was conducted at a high level, viewing large areas and major Packet Pg. 221 9.B.1 PL20230000289 issues, and created the Rural, Urban, and Golden Gate City Sub -Elements of the GGAMP. Restudy -based GMP amendments were adopted in 2019 and did not change the future land use designation of the subject property. Because the proposed project is ±5.53 acres and adjacent to an essential service use, it is not eligible for development under the Transitional Conditional Use provision of the Urban Sub -Element of the GGAMP, which limits sites to between 2.25 and 5 acres not located adjacent to essential service uses. As mentioned previously, the northern portion of the property was developed with a model home sales center per a conditional use granted in 2000 and renewed in 2004 and 2006. The conditional use has since expired and the former model home is currently vacant. The Florida Power & Light (FPL) facility to the south of the property was established as a PUD in 1982. FPL purchased the parcels immediately to the west of the subject property in 2017 and subsequently developed them as part of the existing substation by right per the essential service provisions in Section 2.01.03 of the Land Development Code. Staff concurs with the applicant's assertion that the development of a relatively intense electrical substation has effectively "cut off" the subject property from the surrounding residential uses, making it unlikely to be successfully developed as a single-family home. The proposed ±5.53-acre development will consist of a single ±2.48-acre commercial tract with up to 174,000 square feet of gross floor area of self -storage. Another ±0.37 acres will be required preserve, ±1.78 acres will be open space and landscape buffers, ±.038 acres will be water management, and ±0.52 acres will be drive aisles between the self -storage buildings. The applicant has indicated that all accessways, storage doors, and activities will be internal to the project site. Additionally, the proposed site design generally locates the highest intensity of activity on the southern portion of the property, with water management, enhanced buffering, and two FPL easements totaling 80 ft between the existing residential north of 13th Ave SW and the self - storage development. Commercial Analysis: Real Estate Econometrics, Inc. conducted a market analysis ("Market Analysis for Proposed Self Storage Facility Located at 4050 13th Avenue SW, in Collier County, Florida" is included in the backup materials), analyzing market conditions for the subject site by identifying a 5-mile market area with estimated population, commercial square feet demand, and commercial square feet supply. The 5-mile market area includes Golden Gate City and is otherwise largely urban in character. Staff notes the following from the market analysis: • The permanent population of Collier County is expected to grow by 1.46% annually for the next 10 years (from 397,975 in 2021 to 465,138 in 2032), with growth in last 2 years exceeding that projection at 1.80%. • There are 10 existing storage facilities within the 5-mile market area with an estimated occupancy rate of 96%. • Demand for storage space in Southwest Florida exceeds the national average, largely because of a lack of basement or attic storage. • The addition of the proposed 174,000 square feet of self -storage would create a surplus of 6,084 square feet of self -storage supply in 2031, or an Allocation Ratio of 1.04 (the County uses an Allocation Ratio of 1.15 for the horizon year of the Comprehensive Plan). Based on the demand analysis, staff agrees with the applicant that the provided data and analysis reasonably demonstrates a need for the proposed project. Compatibility: Given the overall isolation of the subject property created by the FPL development, relatively low intensity of the proposed commercial use, low traffic volumes generated, and proximity to a major arterial roadway, staff finds that the requested self -storage use will be compatible with the surrounding area (at the high level at which GMP amendments are reviewed for compatibility) and that this is an appropriate location to provide the needed uses. 4 Packet Pg. 222 9.B.1 PL20230000289 As to the appropriateness of location, staff has identified no infrastructure impacts that result in a lowering of the adopted level of service standard for any affected public infrastructure and has identified no natural or cultural resource impact concerns. The specific compatibility review is deferred to Zoning Services Section staff as part of the detailed review of the companion PUD rezone petition where specific compatibility measures are appropriately considered. However, Comprehensive Planning staff notes that to create a transition from existing commercial and the FPL development to the south to adjacent residential development on 131h Ave SW, the proposed self -storage project will be limited to 38 ft zoned height, with the "liner" buildings closest to 13th Ave SW at lower heights. Enhanced 25 ft buffers combined with existing FPL easements and on -site water management provide greater separation for residents of 13th Ave SW. Additional development standards to ensure compatibility include Dark Sky compliant lighting standards to prevent light pollution to the neighboring residents. CRITERIA FOR GMP AMENDMENTS FLORIDA STATUTES: Data and analysis requirements for comprehensive plans and plan amendments are noted in Chapter 163, F.S., specifically as listed below. Section 163.3177(1)(f), Florida Statutes: (f) All mandatory and optional elements of the comprehensive plan and plan amendments shall be based upon relevant and appropriate data and an analysis by the local government that may include, but not be limited to, surveys, studies, community goals and vision, and other data available at the time of adoption of the comprehensive plan or plan amendment. To be based on data means to react to it in an appropriate way and to the extent necessary indicated by the data available on that particular subject at the time of adoption of the plan or plan amendment at issue. Surveys, studies, and data utilized in the preparation of the comprehensive plan may not be deemed a part of the comprehensive plan unless adopted as a part of it. Copies of such studies, surveys, data, and supporting documents for proposed plans and plan amendments shall be made available for public inspection, and copies of such plans shall be made available to the public upon payment of reasonable charges for reproduction. Support data or summaries are not subject to the compliance review process, but the comprehensive plan must be clearly based on appropriate data. Support data or summaries may be used to aid in the determination of compliance and consistency. 2. Data must be taken from professionally accepted sources. The application of a methodology utilized in data collection or whether a particular methodology is professionally accepted may be evaluated. However, the evaluation may not include whether one accepted methodology is better than another. Original data collection by local governments is not required. However, local governments may use original data so long as methodologies are professionally accepted. 3. The comprehensive plan shall be based upon permanent and seasonal population estimates and projections, which shall either be those published by the Office of Economic and Demographic Research or generated by the local government based upon a professionally acceptable methodology. The plan must be based on at least the minimum amount of land required to accommodate the medium projections as published by the Office of Economic and Demographic Research for at least a 10-year planning period unless otherwise limited under s. 380.05, including related rules of the Administration Commission. Absent physical limitations on population growth, population projections for each municipality, and the unincorporated area within a county must, at a minimum, be reflective of each area's proportional share of the total county population and the total county population growth. Packet Pg. 223 9.B.1 PL20230000289 Section 163.3177(6)(a)2. Florida Statutes: 2. The future land use plan and plan amendments shall be based upon surveys, studies, and data regarding the area, as applicable, including: a. The amount of land required to accommodate anticipated growth. b. The projected permanent and seasonal population of the area. c. The character of undeveloped land. d. The availability of water supplies, public facilities, and services. e. The need for redevelopment, including the renewal of blighted areas and the elimination of nonconforming uses which are inconsistent with the character of the community. f. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to or closely proximate to military installations. g. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to an airport as defined in s. 330.35 and consistent with s. 333.02. h. The discouragement of urban sprawl. i. The need for job creation, capital investment, and economic development that will strengthen and diversify the community's economy. The need to modify land uses and development patterns within antiquated subdivisions. Section 163.3177(6)(a)8. Florida Statutes: (a) A future land use plan element designating proposed future general distribution, location, and extent of the uses of land for residential uses, commercial uses, industry, agriculture, recreation, conservation, education, public facilities, and other categories of the public and private uses of land. The approximate acreage and the general range of density or intensity of use shall be provided for the gross land area included in each existing land use category. The element shall establish the long-term end toward which land use programs and activities are ultimately directed. 8. Future land use map amendments shall be based upon the following analyses: a. An analysis of the availability of facilities and services. b. An analysis of the suitability of the plan amendment for its proposed use considering the character of the undeveloped land, soils, topography, natural resources, and historic resources on site. c. An analysis of the minimum amount of land needed to achieve the goals and requirements of this section. The petitioner must provide appropriate and relevant data and analysis to address the statutory requirements for a Plan Amendment. For this petition, a market analysis ("Market Analysis for Proposed Self Storage Facility Located at 4050 13th Avenue SW, in Collier County, Florida") was provided by the applicant. Section 163.3187 Florida Statutes: Process for adoption of small scale comprehensive plan amendment. (1) A small scale development amendment may be adopted under the following conditions: (a) The proposed amendment involves a use of 50 acres or fewer. [The subject site comprises 5.53± acres.] 6 Packet Pg. 224 9.B.1 PL20230000289 (b) The proposed amendment does not involve a text change to the goals, policies, and objectives of the local government's comprehensive plan, but only proposes a land use change to the future land use map for a site -specific small-scale development activity. However, text changes that relate directly to, and are adopted simultaneously with, the small- scale future land use map amendment shall be permissible under this section. [This amendment does include a text change to the Comprehensive Plan and those text changes are directly related to the proposed future land use map amendment.] (c) The property that is the subject of the proposed amendment is not located within an area of critical state concern, unless the project subject to the proposed amendment involves the construction of affordable housing units meeting the criteria of s. 420.0004(3), and is located within an area of critical state concern designated by s. 380.0552 or by the Administration Commission pursuant to s. 380.05(1). [The subject property is not located within an Area of Critical State Concern.] (4) Comprehensive plans may only be amended in such a way as to preserve the internal consistency of the plan pursuant to s. 163.3177. Corrections, updates, or modifications of current costs which were set out as part of the comprehensive plan shall not, for the purposes of this act, be deemed to be amendments. [This amendment preserves the internal consistency of the plan and is not a correction, update, or modification of current costs which were set out as part of the comprehensive plan.] NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM) NOTES: The applicant conducted two NIMs, one virtual and one in -person. The virtual NIM was held on July 13, 2022 via Zoom and commenced at approximately 5:30 p.m. and ended at 6:01 p.m. Nine members of the public attended the virtual meeting per the Zoom meeting tracker. The applicant's agent, Patrick Vanasse, AICP, explained the request for the proposed rezone and the companion small scale Growth Management Plan amendment. Mr. Vanasse gave a brief presentation in which he gave an overview of the proposed project, introduced the project team, and explained the background of the existing property related to its existing zoning and Future Land Use designations. From there, Mr. Vanasse outlined the details of the rezone and GMP amendment petitions, discussing the PUD master plan and elements including setbacks, buffers, and other specific site design components. Renderings of the proposed project depicting views from each direction of Collier Boulevard were displayed. The following comments/questions were raised by members of the public in attendance: questions related to existing residential zoning, access on 131" Ave SW, and a safety concern related to an existing school bus stop on 13t" Ave SW. The virtual NIM summary and sign -in sheet are included in the CCPC backup materials. The in -person NIM was held on July 14, 2022 at the Collier County South Regional Library (8065 Lely Cultural Parkway). The meeting commenced at 5:30 p.m. and adjourned at approximately 6:26 p.m. Thirteen members of the public attended the meeting. Mr. Vanasse gave the same presentation that was given during the virtual NIM, using the same materials and project description. The following comments/questions were raised by members of the public in attendance: a question regarding the removal of exotic plant species as part of the project, comments related to the compatibility of commercial with the abutting residential and potential, questions about the operational characteristics of the proposed self -storage facility including hours of operation and trips generated, and concerns about vehicular access on 13t" Ave SW. The NIM summary and sign -in sheet are included in the CCPC backup materials. Packet Pg. 225 9.B.1 PL20230000289 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: • The 1311 Ave SW Commercial Infill Subdistrict petition proposes a small-scale Growth Management Plan amendment to create a subdistrict in the Estates Mixed Use District to allow for 174,000 square feet of mini and self -storage. • There are no adverse environmental impacts as a result of this petition. • No historic or archaeological sites are affected by this amendment. • There are no public utility -related concerns as a result of this petition. • There are no concerns about impacts on other public infrastructure. • There is a demonstrated need for the proposed use. • The site's use will create minimal impact on the surrounding area. Transportation Findings: Transportation Planning Staff recommends approval of the proposed GMPA as is, and with the following condition for the PUD rezone: Access shall only be located on 13th Avenue. Alternatively, if access is allowed on Collier Boulevard the Developer shall provide the following: a Bulb -out area to accommodate U-turn movements by a SU-40 vehicle plus a turn lane for the project access; relocate all underground and overhead utilities that conflict or as needed; relocate curb, sidewalk, and stormwater facilities to County Standards; and provide all required compensating Right -Of -Way and easements. The above shall be at no cost to Collier County or Utility Provider(s); all work shall be completed before the start of construction as part of the first Site Development Plan (SDP) or Plat and/or ROW permit. Environmental Findings: Environmental review staff has found this project to be consistent with the Conservation & Coastal Management Element (CCME). The project site consists of ±2.46 acres of native vegetation. A minimum of 0.37 acres (15%) of native vegetation is required to be preserved. This project does not require Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. Environmental Services staff recommends approval of the proposed petition. LEGAL REVIEW: The County Attorney's office reviewed the staff report on March 20, 2023. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Collier County Planning Commission forward petition PL20220000289 13tn Ave SW Commercial Infill Subdistrict GMPA to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation to approve and adopt and transmit to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity and other statutorily required agencies. NOTE: This petition has been tentatively scheduled for the June 13, 2023 BCC meeting. Packet Pg. 226 9.B.2 ORDINANCE NO. 2023- AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 89.05, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE URBAN GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SUB -ELEMENT OF THE GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN ELEMENT AND URBAN GOLDEN GATE AREA FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND MAP SERIES BY CHANGING THE DESIGNATION FROM ESTATES -MIXED USE DISTRICT, RESIDENTIAL ESTATES SUBDISTRICT TO THE ESTATES -COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, 13TH AVENUE SW COMMERCIAL INFILL SUBDISTRICT TO ALLOW UP TO 171,500 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF SELF -STORAGE AND MINI -WAREHOUSING (SIC 4225); AND FURTHERMORE, DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE ADOPTED AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY CONSISTING OF 5.53f ACRES IS LOCATED SOUTHWEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF 13TH AVENUE SW AND COLLIER BOULEVARD, NORTH OF GREEN BOULEVARD IN SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. [PL20220000289] WHEREAS, Collier County, pursuant to Section 163.3161, et. seq., Florida Statutes, the Florida Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, was required to prepare and adopt a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners adopted the Collicr County Growth Management Plan on January 10, 1989; and WHEREAS, the Community Planning Act of 2011 provides authority for local governments to amend their respective comprehensive plans and outlines certain procedures to amend adopted comprehensive plans; and WHEREAS, Shamrock Builders, Inc., an Indiana corporation, requested an amendment to the Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element and Urban Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map and Map Series; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Subsection 163.3187(1), Florida Statutes, this amendment is considered a Small -Scale Amendment; and [22-CMP-01127/1816360/11111 Shamrock Self storage PL20220000289 9119123 Rev Words underlined are added, words struck through have been deleted. 1 of 3 Packet Pg. 227 9.B.2 WHEREAS, the Subdistrict property is not located in an area of critical state concern or a rural area of opportunity; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) on May 18, 2023, considered the proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan and recommended approval of said amendment to the Board of County Commissioners; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County did take action in the manner prescribed by law and held public hearings concerning the proposed adoption of the amendment to the Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element and Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map and Map Series of the Growth Management Plan on ; and WHEREAS, all applicable substantive and procedural requirements of law have been met. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: ADOPTION OF AMENDMENT TO THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN The Board of County Commissioners hereby adopts this small-scale amendment to the Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element and Urban Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map and Map Series in accordance with Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes. The text amendment is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION TWO: SEVERABILITY If any phrase or portion of this Ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion. SECTION THREE: EFFECTIVE DATE The effective date of this plan amendment, if the amendment is not timely challenged, shall be 31 days after Board approval. If timely challenged, this amendment shall become effective on the date the state land planning agency or the Administration Commission, enters a final order determining this adopted amendment to be in compliance. No development orders, development permits, or land uses dependent on this amendment may be issued or commence before it has become effective. j22-CMP-01127/ 1816360/ 11111 Shamrock Self Storage PL20220000289 9/19a3 Words underlined are added, words StFUGugh have been deleted. 2 of 3 Packet Pg. 228 9.B.2 PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida this day of , 2023. ATTEST: CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legality: Heidi Ashton-Cicko, of Managing Assistant County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA IN Rick LoCastro, Chairman Attachment: Exhibit A — Proposed Text Amendment and Map Amendment t22-CMP-01127/1816360/11111 Shamrock Self Storage PL20220000289 9/ 19/23 Words underlined are added, words s4ue'� have been deleted. 3 of 3 Packet Pg. 229 Exhibit A 9.B.2 PL20220000289 EXHIBIT A GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN URBAN GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SUB -ELEMENT *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** Policy 1.1.4: The ESTATES Future Land Use Designation shall include Future Land Use Districts and Subdistricts for: A. ESTATES — COMMERCIAL DISTRICT *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** 6. 131h Ave SW Commercial Infill Subdistrict *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** B. LAND USE DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION SECTION *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** 1. ESTATES DESIGNATION *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** B. Estates — Commercial District *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** 5. Southbrooke Office Subdistrict *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** 6. 131h Ave SW Commercial Infill Subdistrict The 13th Ave Commercial Infill Subdistrict consists of ±5.53 acres and is located at the southwest corner of the intersection of Collier Boulevard and 13th Avenue SW. The purpose of this subdistrict is to allow a mini/self-storage use that will accommodate the needs of area residents and provide a complementary, low -impact neighborhood commercial use that is compatible with the Residential Estates Subdistrict. Development within this Subdistrict shall be subject to the following: a) The development is to be in the form of a Planned Unit Development (PUD). Page 1 of 4 Words underlined are added; words struck -through are deleted. 9/20/2023 Packet Pg. 230 Exhibit A PL20220000289 9.B.2 b) The development shall be limited to a maximum of 171,500 square feet of gross floor area of self- storage/mini warehousing. c) Buildings shall be limited to 3 stories, and a maximum of 38 feet, zoned height. d) Access to the subdistrict shall be limited exclusively to Collier Boulevard. e) A minimum setback of 148 feet shall be provided along 13th Avenue SW. f) An enhanced 25-foot-wide landscape buffer shall be provided along Collier Boulevard and where abutting the water management area along the western boundary. An enhanced 30-foot-wide landscape buffer will be provided along 13t" Avenue SW. At a minimum, these buffers shall contain two staggered rows of trees that shall be spaced no more than 30 feet on center, and a double row hedge at least 24 inches in height at time of planting and attaining a minimum of three feet height within one year. A minimum of 50% of the buffer areas shall be comprised of a meandering bed of shrubs and around covers other than arass. q) A ten -foot "Type A" buffer shall be provided along the proiect's western boundary. The buffer shall be consistent with "Type A" LDC requirements except that required trees shall be spaced no more than 25' on center and alternating with abutting buffer to the west. h) Consistent with public safety requirements and best practices for rural areas, outdoor lighting shall be placed, constructed, and maintained in such manner as to prevent or reduce light pollution. Light poles (light fixtures) shall be limited to a mounting height of 15 ft and dark sky compliant (flat panel, full cut-off fixtures -backlight, up light and glare (BUG) rating where U=0) to avoid light trespass onto adjacent property. Site lighting fixtures will be a 3000K maximum color temperature. *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** C. LIST OF MAPS *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** Naples Senior Center Community Facility Subdistrict 131" Ave SW Commercial Infill Subdistrict Page 2 of 4 Words underlined are added; words struck -through are deleted. 9/20/2023 Packet Pg. 231 Exhibit A PL20220000289 9.B.2 EXHIBIT A 13TH AVE SW COMMERCIAL 1NFILL SUBDISTRICT ('01.I IFIt COUNTY, FLORTDA P1,20220000299 L.1.� i 1 th Aop ISM rr 11 t h AVE SW U) m SUBJECT M SITE 13 h AVE SW I _MM 13th AVE S. 4�.! L -d V 'I 1 th 1W 15th AVE SW l ! I Green BLVD ADOPTED -XXXX, XXxx 0 20D 400 600 Feet LEGEND (Ord, No. XXXX-X) cn�w,uco er. oerll rnNs. uca ® 13TH AVE SW COMMERCIAL IN FILL SUBDISTRICT %ILEA WE 9N CLMMERCKL IHFlLL 5L AIS��K La'..AMWTIaN 4MM%p WTE: APRl, mu Page 3 of 4 Words underlined are added; words struck -through are deleted. 9/20/2023 Packet Pg. 232 9.B.2 Exhibit A PL20220000289 m EXHIBIT 'A PETITION PL20220000289 ESTATES DESIGNATION MIMED USE DISTRICT COMMfRCNL OIM CT '°� °° URBAN GOLDEN GATE ESTATES d N ............. o......... FUTURE LAND USE MAP IMMOKALEE RD 1I IMMOKALEE RD l z J r F a z � Z C7 Z VAND RBILT J BEACH RD IL r O ¢ I i PINE RIDGE RD ❑ rl` z O UI _ Z J G.G. PKWY U) z_ J RADIO a U9 F b q_s O 2 R25E z J z C7 O J GOLDEN GATE BLVD GREEN BLVD ,_ o_ m SUBJECT SITE ryo 13TH AVE SW COMMERCIAL U I NFILL SUBDISTRICT J U x DAVIS BLVD a z m DRSAN GOLDEN GATE DUTURE LAND V eu z D 0 �Maes RATTLES AKE HAMMOCK RD R27E R20E R29E Page 4 of 4 Words underlined are added; words struck -through are deleted. 9/20/2023 Packet Pg. 233 9.B.3 ENGINEERING MEMORANDUM DATE: July 13, 2022 TO: Rachel Hansen, Principal Planner Collier County— Planning and Zoning Division Eric Ortman, Principal Planner Collier County — Planning and Zoning Division FROM: Patrick Vanasse, AICP ' RWA Engineering PROJECT NAME(S): 4050 13 Ave SW GMPA (PL20220000289); and 4050 13 Ave SW Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) (131-20210003321) SUBJECT: Zoom Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) Summary The 4050 13 Ave SW Virtual Neighborhood Information Meeting was held on July 13, 2022, at 5:30pm. Applicant and Agent Attendees are as follows: • Greg O'Herren, Shamrock Builders • Patrick Vanasse, AICP, Director of Community Development - RWA Engineering • Blake Finnegan, Associate Planner - RWA Engineering • Noel Davies, Land Use Attorney, Davies Duke, PLLC • James Banks, PE, JMB Transportation Engineering, Inc • Rachel Hansen, Principal Planner, Collier County Planning and Zoning Division • Eric Ortman, Principal Planner, Collier County Planning and Zoning Division 6610 Willow Park Drive Suite 200 Naples, FL 34109 1 (239) 597-0575 1 Fax (239) 597-0578 Page 1 of 3 Packet Pg. 234 TWA - The Presentation Summary (Started at 5:30 pm): Mr. Vanasse began the meeting providing a brief overview of the Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment and Planned Development rezone under review by the Collier County Planning and Zoning Department staff. He then introduced himself and the project Team. Mr. Vanasse then explained the background of the existing property and details regarding its location, current zoning, and future land use designations, and to existing adjacent land use designations. From there, Mr. Vanasse further outlined the request of the applicant that was submitted to Collier County. This involved detailing the Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment and reviewing the existing Future Land Use Map (FLUM). He then explained the proposed amendment to the FLUM from Estates to 13th Ave SW Commercial Infill Subdistrict. Mr. Vanasse then discussed why the CPUD Rezone and GMPA was necessary and shared some of the benefits of the project. A draft of the proposed GMPA Subdistrict language was presented which included an overview of the proposed district and commitments of the proposed project. Mr. Vanasse then reviewed the proposed Planned Development rezone from Estates to CPUD. He discussed the Master Plan and the specific details proposed related to the plan. Such details included setbacks, buffers, distance separation from adjacent uses, and other specific site design components of the property. Renderings of the proposed project were displayed from each direction off 951. Mr. Vanasse then shared some additional benefits of the project while also emphasizing the project remains compatible to surrounding properties. The presentation concluded with Mr. Vanasse outlining the process and timeline for the application review process and future public hearings for the public to attend. The floor was then opened for questions. Residents were required to type their questions in the chat box which were then addressed individually after the meeting presentation had concluded. Questions Summary: Q: Why is it zoned residential if the noise is so bad? A: The zoning pre -dates those FPL facilities. Those are essential service facilities. In Collier County, if you fall within a list of those essential service facilities, you are allowed to build them by right in any zoning. There was unfortunately a small piece of land left next to it, which is the subject property. Q: There's an existing SF home on the property why can't it stay residential? A: Most of the property is vacant. The home was built as a model home under a conditional use permit years ago. It was a small local builder uses for a little while and has been abandoned for years now. Q: Entrance to the storage is from 13th Ave SW or 951? A: What is being proposed is on 13 Ave SW. 6610 Willow Drive Suite 200 Naples, FL 34109 1 (239) 597-0575 1 Fax (239) 597-0578 Page 2 of 3 Packet Pg. 235 9.B.3 ENGI Q: We have a school bus stop there, how do you feel this is safe? A: One of the things we have mentioned is that we are a very low traffic generator. Typically, people use self - storage during non -peak -hour times. As far as we are concerned, we don't believe this will cause a safety issue. Q: Who do we contact at the county review process? A: You can contact Rachel Hanson or Eric Ortman. They will have an opportunity to speak once we wrap this up. They will provide their contact information. If you are looking for application materials, please refer to CityView website. Since there were no further questions or comments, Mr. Vanasse adjourned the meeting at approximately 6:01 p.m. The county Planners Eric Ortman and Rachel Hanson then followed up with their information and encouraged any additional comments or feedback. Mr. Vanasse also noted his contact information once again and reiterated he is open to any further comments or feedback as well. Attached are related meeting documents for reference: • Meeting attendee tracker 6610 Willow Drive Suite 200 Naples, FL 34109 1 (239) 597-0575 1 Fax (239) 597-0578 Page 3 of 3 Packet Pg. 236 4050 Zoom Meeting Tracker Name Anthony Zientek Joseph & Patricia Lertch Tom Moss Shirley Lytwyn Patti Raco Eric Manring Pat V Jared Odor Email azientekl0@gmail.com lertchp@comcast.net. wtommoss@hotmail.com shirleysun278@aol.com Not registered Not registered Not registered Not registered Address Not provided 4691 13th Ave SW 4316 13th Ave. SW 34116 4131 13th Ave SW Not registered Not registered Not registered Not registered Phone Number Not provided Not provided 239-821-2213 239-404-1523 Not registered Not registered Not registered Not registered Packet Pg. 237 9.B.3 ENGINEERING MEMORANDUM DATE: July 14, 2022 TO: Rachel Hansen, Principal Planner Collier County— Planning and Zoning Division Eric Ortman, Principal Planner Collier County — Planning and Zoning Division FROM: Patrick Vanasse, AICP ' RWA Engineering PROJECT NAME(S): 4050 13 Ave SW GMPA (PL20220000289); and 4050 13 Ave SW Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) (PL20210003321) SUBJECT: In -Person Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) Summary The 4050 13 Ave SW In -Person Neighborhood Information Meeting was held on July 14, 2022, at 5:30pm Applicant and Agent Attendees are as follows: • Greg O'Herren, Shamrock Builders • Patrick Vanasse, AICP, Director of Community Development — RWA Engineering • Blake Finnegan, Associate Planner — RWA Engineering • Noel Davies, Land Use Attorney, Davies Duke, PLLC • James Banks, PE, JMB Transportation Engineering, Inc • Rachel Hansen, Principal Planner, Collier County Planning and Zoning Division • Eric Ortman, Principal Planner, Collier County Planning and Zoning Division 6610 Willow Park Drive Suite 200 Naples, FL 34109 1 (239) 597-0575 1 Fax (239) 597-0578 Page 1 of 5 Packet Pg. 238 9.B.3 ENGI Attached are related meeting documents for reference: • Meeting sign -in sheet • Affidavit of public notice The following provides a summary of the meeting presentation along with questions, concerns or issues that were raised at the meeting; and the applicant's responses Presentation Summary (Started at 5:30 pm): Mr. Vanasse began the meeting providing a brief overview of the Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment and Planned Development rezone under review by the Collier County Planning and Zoning Department staff. He then introduced himself and the project Team. Mr. Vanasse then explained the background of the existing property and details regarding its location, current zoning and future land use designations, and to existing adjacent land use designations. From there, Mr. Vanasse further outlined the request of the applicant that was submitted to Collier County. This involved detailing the Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment and reviewing the existing Future Land Use Map (FLUM). He then explained the proposed amendment to the FLUM from Estates to 13th Ave SW Commercial Infill Subdistrict. Mr. Vanasse then discussed why the CPUD Rezone and GMPA was necessary and shared some of the benefits of the project. A draft of the proposed GMPA Subdistrict language was presented which included an overview of the proposed district and commitments of the proposed project. Mr. Vanasse then reviewed the proposed Planned Development rezone from Estates to CPUD. He discussed the Master Plan and the specific details proposed related to the plan. Such details included setbacks, buffers, distance separation from adjacent uses, and other specific site design components of the property. Renderings of the proposed project were displayed from each direction off 951. Mr. Vanasse then shared some additional benefits of the project while also emphasizing the project remains compatible to surrounding properties. The brief presentation concluded with Mr. Vanasse outlining the process and timeline for the application review process and future public hearings for the public to attend. The floor was then opened for questions. The primary and consistent concern of members of the public related to access, where the public strongly requested that the developer provide access on 13`" Ave SW instead of Collier Boulevard. Questions/Comments/Concerns/Issues Summary: C: If you look at the picture on the mailer, it notes 500' there, that goes to the opposite side of the property, there is a home there— it's not accurate. A: This is approximate measurement from google earth from the subject property to the nearest home, not the property line. Q: You said you were obligated to remove the exotics, what does that mean? 6610 Willow Drive Suite 200 Naples, FL 34109 1 (239) 597-0575 1 Fax (239) 597-0578 Page 2 of 5 Packet Pg. 239 9.B.3 ENGI A: In Collier County, there are certain invasive exotic species. It is a requirement when you develop land to identify and remove a certain percentage of these invasive exotics. We had our ecologist identify any invasive exotics that will be required by the county to be removed. C: 38 feet height is what it said on the mailer we received. This does not mimic the houses in the area. There are only a few two-story houses in the area. Our single-family homes are not even 20 feet high. Seems incorrect for you to say that. Also, we have a lot of traffic on our street which has been an issue recently with people speeding up and down it not realizing it's a dead-end. The street (15t" street) is already not safe for pedestrians. Q: Will customers have access to this 24-7? My concern is again the extra traffic this will cause. A: Access will be limited, and a rough estimate would be 6:OOam-9:00 or 10:OOpm for operations and 9:00 to 6:OOpm for customers, not 24/7. C: I live next to the station and there is not humming coming from the FPL Sub -station C: I do too, there use to be some humming at the beginning but now it's better. Q: Who owns the land right now? C: An LLC owns the land and it is under contract with the Applicant. Q: How long will it take to build C: Construction time for a facility like this would be approximately one year. C: She asked who owns the property. Actually, its two real estate agents. There are five people that own it, two real estate agents and three others. C: Three points here. You sited other commercial structures around the area as a good fit for this. I agree, at some point in time, there will be something commercial there. However, none of those other structures bring traffic on E 13t" - this will. It will also bring big trucks. This is also 174k square feet, larger than Super Target and Publix down c the street. Also, there is a school bus stop right there which will come into conflict with the kids catching the school bus. I would suggest it be a lot smaller and it needs to have a driveway off collier and not 13tn Z gg y z C: Last night you mentioned the "humm". I disagree this can't be residential. The traffic and access point proposed is a nightmare waiting to happen. It's not safe for the kids to have something like this with blind spots for the trucks coming in. This needs to be taken this into consideration. Q: Any sort or fence on the boundary? A: The whole permitter forms the fence, it's a 10' wall all around it. If there are any gaps, we will have a fence Q: Any signage? A: Those details have not been finalized. 6610 Willow Drive Suite 200 Naples, FL 34109 1 (239) 597-0575 1 Fax (239) 597-0578 Page 3 of 5 Packet Pg. 240 9.B.3 ENGI Q: Can you talk more to the number of trips associated with the project which are detailed in the TIS? A: We estimate 26 PM Peak -Hour two-way trips. This would be people coming in and out, meaning 10-14 in and 10-14 out during the busiest hours of the day. C: My main concern would be the access on 13t". I do not see any reason in the world why it can't come off 951 and then a real good buffer on 13tn A: We are looking into the access issue with the county. We will have to address separation requirements. C: This property has always been estates. Estates means lands with a big house, and that's what we have. The FPL Sub -station happened which hit us very hard. We do not want or need the storage use. Over our dead bodies will you build anything on this land. There are people coming down our street to look for a place to live. Once they see that FPL station, they hesitate and don't want to live there. If we are going to rezone this property, why not put something other than self -storage. There are 26 self -storage facilities in a radius of 5 miles. There are 13 on collier Blvd. We already have FPL; we do not need anything else here. I don't want a junk yard on my property with a lid on it. That is all this is, a junkyard with a lid. This piece of property is sacred and belongs to us. Q: Is this going to be like Cube Smart A: Cube Smart will most likely manage the facility. Q: 174k square feet — how many storage units? A: The way this industry works is it is calculated from a square feet standpoint. Typically, from a planning and zoning standpoint, we don't look at number of units, we look at square footage. This is how we calculate the trips associated with the project. The number of units will be determined by market demand at a later point. C: I'm a realtor, I'm concerned with decline in property value. I would like to be reimbursed because this is not fair. Q: Recently, we have seen people moving into storage units and especially living there. How will we prevent that? We don't need people living in these units on our streets like a homeless camp. A: I have heard stories like this before. My opinion is that this is a thing of the past. There has been an evolution in these types of facilities, and they are much more strictly maintained and staffed with security. This would be highly unlikely and certainly not permitted. Q: What about light? A: The county has restrictions on lighting which require them to not project off the property. Q: How do you come up with a traffic count without any idea of units? A: There is a manual of traffic engineers which the traffic engineers utilize. They look at a multitude of self -storage uses throughout the country. They do trip counts, and they average that out per square foot. Q: In your report you mention vacancy rate? How do you determine that without number of units? A: We have an economist that does the report. He has methodology which he uses to analyze market demand. 6610 Willow Drive Suite 200 Naples, FL 34109 1 (239) 597-0575 1 Fax (239) 597-0578 Page 4 of 5 Packet Pg. 241 9.B.3 ENGI Q: What will you say to the planning commission when they ask how many units there will be? A: It is possible we may have an answer at that time. Q: It seems we are going to have 174k square foot sprawling building on just under 5 acres. I'm concerned the height will be much higher than 3 stories. A: Our 3-story building will be 85-90 thousand square feet. All other will be single story buildings. Q: Will there be people running business out of here? A: No. Q: Who are you building a storage for? A: Nationwide 1/10 use self -storage. Also, statistically, American people do not want to drive far for storage. Three miles is kind of the sweet spot people are willing to travel. 175 creates a huge psychological barrier which people perceive as too far. Our Market study indicates a need and we have taken this into consideration. C: We don't want people from all over coming to our neighborhood to store their stuff. Q: Have you considered anything else other than self -storage? Something a lot smaller and not so offensive to us A: We do not have any knowledge to this. Since there were no further questions or comments, Mr. Vanasse adjourned the meeting at approximately 6:26 p.m. He then noted that additional information can be accessed on the CityView website. The county Planner Eric Ortman and Rachel Hansen then followed up with their information and business cards and encouraged any additional feedback or comments. Attachments: • Meeting Sign -in Sheet • News -Press Legal Ad Publication Affidavit 6610 Willow Drive Suite 200 Naples, FL 34109 1 (239) 597-0575 1 Fax (239) 597-0578 Page 5 of 5 Packet Pg. 242 9.B.3 Sign -In Sheet ywaww��k 4050 13 Ave SW Information Meeting ENGINEERING 7/14/2022 at 5:30pm Name Company Street Address City Phone # Email wzj � Lc 7`tff �q 2_x L"y 1 1 �- ! 1 CQCL_ vl�wl/ k� 0 11—F� e I `—1 1 U 13 �_I Ave. S &J 3 1 S 7 7 ' Q� L4 y i v 13 v- % A,v e S Id Page 1 OT 2 Packet Pg. 243 9.B.3 Publication Date 6/27/2022 Ad Number GC10904407 Publication Daily News Market Naples Delivery Method Email Number of Affidavits Needed 1 Customer Name RWA Engineering Customer Phone Number (239) 449-8877 Customer Address 12800 University DR # 175 Fort Myers, FL 33907-5342 Account Number (If Known) AP-782662 Customer Email Blake@consult-rwa.com Your Name Marita Froimson Email Address mfroimson@gannett.com Packet Pg. 244 :jattjj NtWq PART OETHE USA TODAY NETWORK Published Daily Naples, FL 34110 RWA ENGINEERING 12800 UNIVERSITY DR #175 FORT MYERS, FL 33907 ATTN Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WISCONSIN COUNTY OF BROWN Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, personally appeared who on oath says that they serve as legal clerk of the Naples Daily News, a daily newspaper published at Naples, in Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida; that the attached copy of the advertising was published in said newspaper on dates listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples, in said Collier County, Florida , for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. 6/27/2022 Subscribed and sworn to before on June 27th, 2022 115'15 as PUBLICATION COST: $1,008.00 AD No: GC10904407 CUSTOMER NO: 782662 PO#: PUBLIC NOTICE AD SIZE: DISPLAY AD NANCY HEYRMAN Notary Public State of Wisconsin 9.B.3 Packet Pg. 245 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING 9.B.3 The public is invited to attend a neighborhood information meetings (NIM) held by Patrick Vanasse of RWA Engineering, representing Shamrock Builders: Virtual Zoom Meeting July 13th, 2022 at 5:30 p.m. Should you choose to participate in the Zoom meeting, please notify us via email at blake@ consult-rwa.com prior to July 11, 2022, to allow us to send you login instructions and document your attendance. In -Person Meeting July 14th, 2022 at 5:30 p.m. at Collier County South Regional Library, 8065 Lely Cultural Pkwy #9005, Naples Subject Property: 4050 13th Avenue SW located at the southwest corner of the intersection of 13th Ave SW and Collier Blvd. The property owner is petitioning Collier County for a Growth Management Plan Amendment and Rezoning from Estates to Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) (PL20220000289 and PL20210003321) to limit the uses allowed on the property from residential to self -storage facility only. WE VALUE YOUR INPUT Business and property owners, residents and visitors are welcome to attend the presentation and discuss the project with the owner/developer and RWA Engineering . If you are unable to attend this meeting, but have questions or comments, they can be directed by mail, phone, or e-mail by August 14, 2022 to: Patrick Vanasse RWA Engineering 6610 Willow Park Drive Naples, FL 34109 239-398-2016 patrick@consult-rwa.com II No-GGI09NZ07-01 Packet Pg. 246 Cover story Continued From Page 1D town Fort Myers' fireworks show from the Davis Art Canters rooftop sculpture garden. Plus a barbecue buffet from Dave's Bangin' BBQ, draft beer and wine, and live music from reggae -soul band The Freecoas- ters. 7-11 p-m, Monday, July 4, $99 in advance, $125 on event day. $1000 for a VIP table of four- Sidney & Berne Davis Art Center, 2301 First St„ downtown Fort Myers. 333-1933 or sbdac,com July 4th Fireworks Dinner Cruise: Cruise the Ca- loosahatchee River for three hours on the paddle- wheel boat The Capt. JP. Includes dinner, dancing and a view of the fireworks in downtown Fort Myers from the open third deck, 7:30-10 p in. Monday, July 4, $85. JC Cruises, 1300 Hendry St„ downtown Fort Myers 334-7474 orjccruises.com Hot Dogs For Heroes: City Tavern hosts the third annual chili -dog -eating competition to benefit Amer- ican Legion Post 38. This block party also includes a deejay, food, drinks and a view of downtown Fort My- ers' fireworks. 4-10 pm, Monday, July 4, Free- The chili dog contest starts at 6 pm" City Tavern, 2206 Bay St-, w dontown Fort Myers. 226-1133 or mycitytavemcom NAPLES Monday, July 4 Fourth of July Parade: The annual parade travels along Broad Avenue South to Third Street South, Fifth Avenue South, Eighth Street South and Eighth Avenue South, 10 a.m to noon Monday, July 4, Fifth Avenue South will be closed off to traffic between Third Street and Eighth Street South Downtown Naples fiRhave- nuesouth.com/event-calendar/4th-of-july-parade Fireworks at Naples Pier: Bring chairs and blan- kets to watch the fireworks launch Monday, July 4, from a barge north of Naples Pier. The fireworks can be seen from all along the Naples beach Personal use of fireworks and sparklers is prohibited. Parking is lim- ited, so visitors are urged to plan ahead and find park- ing on the street or in downtown parking garages; or to walk, take bicycles or use a ride service. Fireworks launch at about 9 p,m. Free. The pier will be closed from 6-11p. m. Naples City Pier, l2th Avenue South, Na- ples, naplesgoecom/parksree/page/city-naples-4th- jWy-events 4th of July Fireworks Celebration: C08ier County Parks & Recreation hosts this annual Fourth of July event with bounce houses, live entertainment, food trucks and fireworks, 3-10 pm Monday, July 4. Fire- works at 9 pm. Free- Bring lawn chairs and blankets. Parking is limited. Overflow traffic can go to nearby East Naples Community Park Sugden Regional Park, 4284 Avalon Drive, Naples. 252-4000 Fireworks cruise: Get a "front -row seat" from the water for the Naples Pier fireworks. The sunset cruise travels along Collier County's coastal waterways be- fore stopping for the fireworks show_ 7:15 pm- Monday, Is - 1I Naples' Fourth of July parade travels along Broad Avenue South to Third Street South, Fifth Avenue South, Eighth Street South and Eighth Avenue South, MORGAN HOBNSBY/NAPLES DAILY NEWS July 4. $145 includes dinner, The M/V Double Sun- giant water slides).1-10 p.m. Sunday, July 3. Fireworks a hi nedeparts from Tin City, 1200FiRh Ave. S., Naples, start at 9 pm, over the Peace River. $5 admission. 263-4949 or porefi.com Wristbands for unlimited use of the water slides are $10. Laishley Park, 100 Nesbit Road, Punta Gorda. pun- BONITA SPRINGS tagordafireworks.com Monday, July 4 Star Spangled Bonita: The annual Fourth of July festival features fireworks, a laser -light show, food and live country music by the Ben Allen Band. 6-9 pm. Monday, July 4. Free. Old 41 Road will be closed from 5:30 p-m- to about 10 pm. from Wilson Street to Chil- ders Street Riverside Park, 10451 Old 41 Road, Bonita Springs, 949-6262 or cityofbonitasprings,org/july4th Bonita Springs Fourth of July parade: Bonita Springs Professional Firefighters Local 3444 hosts the annual parade on Old 41 Road. It includes bands, fife - and -drum corps, floats, military units and more. 9 a,m" Monday, July 4. Free, Old 41 Road will be closed along the parade route from 8:30 a.m. until after the parade. The parade travels along Old 41 Road from Kentucky Street to Rosemary Drive in downtown Bon- ita Springs, 298-4706 or bonitaspringsparade.com PUNTA GORDA Sunday, July 3 Freedom-Fest: The annual event includes fire- works, live music, a kids fun zone, vendors, displays, festival food, beer and Water -Mania (a coflection of 12 The way to... cars instruments garage sales jewelery tickets furniture antiques auctions motorcycles collectibles computers jobs boats appliances sports yard sales equipment tablets pets cameras �ai�TSSfL�� Plar•_a vn„r r_laccifiPd art 4nrlav Sunday and Monday, July 3-4 Independence Holiday Celebration at Fisher- men's Village: Two days of patriotic events, including live music, food and fireworks. Festivities start at noon Sunday and Monday, Judy 3-4. Free. The weekend in- cludes fireworks at 9 pm. Monday. Fisherman's Vil- lage,1200 W. Retta Esplanade, Punta Gorda 941-639- 8721 or fishville,com See COVER STORY, Page SO ALL DAY �, u rFJllls s wlfRltllf� MONDAY �mi[HELBOHIS MANIA hltmpici6o p Hfti 5.5TkAKS OUR BEST tM BURGER DEALI ARGILS STEAK BARBER Wff IES� .OALar aiv11m9rrUf JxRN.�w �r+^h �ANnn CR a. Ptlltuf, F.•ln 9i3 � ,al fpyRty ILZN"bnk. cp r?:•.yt NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING The public is InvnInformation ad to attend a neighborhood Infoation meetings (NIM) held by Palrick Vanasse of RWA Engineering, representing Shamrock Builders: Virtual Zoom Meeting July 13d1, 2022 at 5:30 p.m. Should you choose to participate In the Zoom meeting, please notify us via email M bloke® oonsull-rwa cam prior to July 11, 2022, to allow us to send you login instructions and ,bre,nbfnt yew atl+yldarlelE In -Perron Meeting Job 14Br, Z22 at 5:30 p.m, at Collier County South Regional Library, Betas Lely Cul Nral Pkwy 119005, Naples Subject Property: 4050 13Ih Avenue SW located at the southwest comer of the inter —lion of 131h Ave SW and Collier Blvd, — PIffE BIOGE TTN AYE SW •'-�- -- - -y 0 i . 13tH AVr taw- SUBJECT PROPERTY -' � 5 3 jVT � 0.VE 1Y�T T r I` �l i 1 l_ fI --- -GREkN OLVO" The Properly owner is petitioning Coll,er County for a Growth Management Plan Amendment and Rezoning from Estates to Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) (PI20220000289 and PL20210003321) to limit Una uses allowed on the pmperry kno, residential to self -storage facility any. WE VALUE YOUR INPUT Business Intl property owners, revdenls and visitors are wekoma to arend the piasenlallon and Il dlscuss the prolecl w,th the owner/developer and RWA Engineering If you are unable a alb-d eel,ng but have quesl,ons this me, commen is they can De directed by ,it phone, or a mall by August Ic, 20221,: Patnck Van. sse RWA Fng,neenng 6610 Willow Park Dnve Naples, FL 34109 239-398 2016 nalnckRconsull-rw. cam 9.B.3 d E 7 V 0 a Packet Pg. 247 9.B.6 SIGN POSTING INSTRUCTIONS (CHAPTER 8, COLLIER COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT) A zoning sign(s) must be posted by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent on the parcel for a minimum of fifteen (15) calendar days in advance of the first public hearing and said sign(s) must be maintained by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent through the Board of County Commissioners Hearing. Below are general guidelines for signs, however these guidelines should not be construed to supersede any requirement of the LDC. For specific sign requirements, please refer to the Administrative Code, Chapter 8 E. 1. The sign(s) must be erected in full view of the public, not more than five (5) feet from the nearest street right-of-way or casement. 2. The sign(s) must be securely affixed by nails, staples, or other means to a wood frame or to a wood panel and then fastened securely to a post, or other structure. The sign may not be affixed to a tree or other foliage. 3. The petitioner or the petitioner's agent must maintain the sign(s) in place, and readable condition until the requested action has been heard and a final decision rendered. If the sign(s) is destroyed, lost, or rendered unreadable, the petitioner or the petitioner's agent must replace the sign(s NOTE: AFTER THE SIGN HAS BEEN POSTED, THIS AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE SHOULD BE RETURNED NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORKING DAYS BEFORE THE FIRST HEARING DATE TO THE ASSIGNED PLANNER. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER BEFORE THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, PERSONALLY APPEARED Laura Tefft, AICP WHO ON OATH SAYS THAT HE/SHE HAS POSTED PROPER NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 10.03.00 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE ON THE PARCEL COVERED IN PETITION NUMBER PL20220000289 and PL20210003321 r. 5618 Whispering Willow Way SI NATURE OF A P ICANT OR AGENT STREET OR P.O. BOX Laura Tefft Fort Myer- EL 11908 NAME (TYPED OR PRINTED) CITY, STATE ZIP STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was sworn to and subscribed before me thisday of �� , 2W�, by �V. �� . ernally known to m,por who produced as identification and who did/did not take an oath. AMANDAVILLA .: :• MY COMMISSION If HH 414730 EXPIRES: July 28, 2027 '•, eon e�,,. My Commission Expires: (Stamp with serial number) ignaturc of Notary Public NAAAWIV \L N anted Name of Notary Public Rev. 3/4/2015 Packet Pg. 248 .UREIC HEAMUTI E 4050 13TH AVE SW CPUO PUD2. PL20210003321 GMPA-PL20220000259 CCPC* MAY 18, 0 3 — :00 a.m. 8CC: DEC 12, 202 — :00 a.m. BOARD OF COUNTY CDMISSIONER ' CHAMBERS THIRD FLOOR, -COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 329G TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST, NAPLES EL 04112 ERIC ORTMAN, PRINCIPAL PLANNER: 239-252-1032 RA HEL HANSEN, PRINCIPAL PLANN£FZ� 239-252-1442 9.B.6 Packet Pg. 249 93.6 -I'PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE 4050 131H AVE SW CPU � PUD7, PL202t0043321 GMPA•PL202200002N C'r pAA 18, 20 - 9:00 a. m. B Gr DEC 12, 202 - 9:00 a.m. 0 BOARD OF-COUINTY COMISSION ERS' CHAMBERS I.1IRa FLOOR. COLDER COUNTY GOVERNMENT CFNTER v _ 3299 TA MIAMI. TRAIL PAST NAPLE• S FL 4112 3 EMC ORTMAN. PRINCIPAL PI-A14NER; 239.252-1632 d RACHEL- HA"SEM. PRINCIPAL Pt ANMER; 239-252-1442 CC C E t v cC Q r C d E t ;. Packet Pg. 250 1 9.13.7 1 MARKET ANALYSIS FOR PROPOSED SELF STORAGE FACILITY LOCATED AT 4050 13T" AVENUE SW, IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA December 7, 2022 Prepared for Mr. Greg O'Herren Shamrock Builders Suite 202 9800 Westpoint Drive Indianapolis, IN 46256 Prepared by sill Planning— Execution— Results r Real Estate Econometrics, Inc. Real Estate Econometrics, Inc. Suite 100 707 Orchid Drive Naples, Florida 34102 (239) 269-1341 Ree-i.Com Packet Pg. 251 1 9.B.7 1.0 SELF STORAGE FACILITY STUDY Shamrock Builders ("Applicant") is proposing a site -specific, 174,000 square - foot self -storage facility at the corner of 13t" Avenue SW and Collier Boulevard (the "Subject Property") in unincorporated Collier County, Florida ("County"). The Subject Property is 5.53 +/- acres in size and is a combination of two parcels zoned Estates. The parcels are located within the Estates ("ES") future land use designation. The Subject Property currently has an abandoned former model home on the north parcel. The south parcel is currently undeveloped and partially vegetated. Both parcels combined are surrounded by Florida Power & Light sub -stations and staging facilities to the south and west. The Applicant is submitting a Collier County Growth Management Plan Amendment ("GMPA") map and text change for the property from its current Estates designation to the proposed 13t" Avenue SW Commercial Infill SubdistrictC-4 use that allows for self -storage facilities. The Client is seeking to develop a Self -Storage facility on the Subject Property. Since Self -Storage is a commercial use and the Subject Site is currently zoned Estates, a market study ("Market Study") is needed to support the GMPA. The Market Study first reviews the Self -Storage market from a national perspective, then takes a look at where domestic migration is taking place. The Market Study looks at where Collier County in -migration is coming from and drills down into the site -specific market's future population growth and residential development potential. 1.1 Subject Property Assessment The Subject Property is located at the corner of 13t" Avenue SW and Collier Boulevard in the County. The Subject Property is bordered by Florida Power & Light substations to its south and west. The Subject Property fronts 13tn Avenue SW at its northern boundary and Collier Boulevard at its eastern boundary as shown in Figure 1 on the next page. Packet Pg. 252 9.B.7 Figure 1 — Subject Property Source: ESRI ARCgis Mapping System and Consultant. The Subject Property is suitable for the proposed self -storage use as utilities are located on two of its boundaries and fronts a major County arterial road. The Subject Property offers ease of ingress and egress to the major arterial road and will have limited traffic impact due to the nature of the use. 1.2 Self -Storage Industry Market Dynamics The Self -Storage Industry continues to grow across the nation and particularly in the sunbelt states, which have seen exponential growth over and above the consistent growth they've enjoyed for the past few decades. The exponential growth has been fueled by the COVID-19 Pandemic that generated a population migration from northern states to the sunbelt states. Currently, 9.4% of U.S. households rent a storage unit, and many think that number is poised to grow due to two of the largest cohorts in the population — the Baby Boomers and the Millennials. Packet Pg. 253 9.B.7 The Baby Boomers are moving into their retirement years. As Boomers downsize and move to warmer climates, many items will need to be stored. A lifetime of accumulated possessions can be difficult to part with and even with diligent pruning, is often difficult to condense into a two -bedroom home or apartment. Another driving force behind self -storage is the Millennial population that are coming of age, buying homes, starting families, and contributing to the demographic migration to the southeast and suburbs. During the pandemic, virtual work arrangements allowed many Millennials to move south for lifestyle and tax benefits. The Millennials and Baby Boomers represent a huge opportunity as they are moving and looking for ways to live affordably yet comfortably. Self -storage is providing the missing puzzle piece. Why Are Storage Units So Hot in Southwest Florida? In a story that appeared in the Naples Daily News two years ago (Appendix A, Page 12), data collected by Maxwell, Hendry & Simmons, LLC, a Southwest Florida real estate appraisal firm, noted that Collier County has approximately 9.02 square feet of storage space per person, which exceeds the national average of about 6.5 square feet of storage space per person. It should be noted that the square foot demand for storage space is much higher in the urban area of Collier County. The Naples urban area shows a demand of 16.42 square feet per capita (Appendix B, Page 15). Gerald Hendry, a state -certified real estate appraiser with the firm, pointed out that unlike other areas of the country, Southwest Florida doesn't have basements or other areas to store items that have been accumulated over the years. He also said that other storage components such as open storage for boats and RVs are in high demand as most of the communities that have been developed over the past few decades in Southwest Florida are deed restricted with no options for this type of storage. Mr. Hendry pointed out that the popularity of self -storage facilities has paralleled the dramatic growth of rental apartment complexes in Lee and Collier Counties. He said that those units are small with limited storage thus many renters are opting to have a storage unit to store their extraneous items until such time they move into a larger living area. In a related self -storage story (Appendix C, Page 17), Matt Price, CEO of Seagate Development points out that self -storage will always be gif in Florida because of the lack of basements and the extra storage space in an attic is too hot. He also said that there are a lot of people here and there is not a lot of places to put stuff. Packet Pg. 254 9.B.7 1.3 POPULATION GROWTH National Movement Trend According to the State of Florida's Office of Economic and Demographic Research ("OEDR"), an estimated 329,717 new residents settled in Florida between April 2020 and April 2021. According to the National Association of Realtors, a total of 8.9 million people changed address since the start of the pandemic. The Association reports that close to 28% of the people relocating to Florida came from Texas and another 15% relocated from New York, with a little over 6% coming from California. Florida's popularity isn't expected to end any time soon. The state is expected to gain an average 845 new residents a day until 2025, according to ODER (Appendix D, Page 21). That is analogous to approximately the City of Orlando's population every year. This continued state growth will positively impact Collier County's future population growth. Collier County Growth The permanent population forecast for Collier County is expected to grow by 1.46% annually for the next 10 years as shown in the latest Collier County Permanent Population Estimates and Projections prepared by the Collier County Comprehensive Zoning Division, June 19, 2021 (Appendix E, Page 23). The County has surpassed that growth percent during the COVID 19 Pandemic over the past two (2) years as many people from northern states took the opportunity to move to tax friendly Florida as they worked from home and the baby boomer generation jumped at the same opportunity to retire early and make the same move. Table 1 below shows the forecasted permanent population growth for the next 10 years in Collier County. Table 1 Permanent Population Growth Forecast for Collier County Year Permanent Population Percent Growth 2021 397,975 -- 2022 405,138 1.80% 2023 412,431 1.80% 2024 419,855 1.80% 2025 426,443 1.57% 2026 432,166 1.34% 2027 437,966 1.34% 2028 443,844 1.34% 2029 449,801 1.34% 2030 455,246 1.21% 2031 460,166 1.08% 2032 465,138 1.08% Average Annual 10-Year Growth: 1.46% Source: Collier County Comprehensive Zoning Division, June 19, 2021 Packet Pg. 255 9.B.7 As noted in the previous Self -Storage Industry Dynamics section of this report, people moving to Florida tend to utilize self -storage facilities at a greater pace due to the lack of storage spaces like basements in their Florida residence and their purchase of smaller size residential units due to higher residential prices compared to northern homes. The County's projected population growth and in -migration analysis along with the development of smaller residential units strongly supports the need for additional Self -Storage services in Collier County. 2.0 SELF -STORAGE MARKET DEMAND PER CAPITA Determining market demand per capita requires determining a baseline from which to project future demand for a particular market area. Basically, the baseline demand considers that the market area being measured is currently in a state of equilibrium whereby equilibrium is the state in which market supply and demand balance each other, and as a result prices become stable. Generally, an over -supply of goods or services causes prices to go down, which results in higher demand while an under -supply or shortage causes prices to go up resulting in less demand. To determine the current demand per capita for a commodity or service, the total amount of the commodity or service in a market area is researched and that total is divided by the population in the same market area at that particular point in time. That per capita demand is utilized in determining the amount of commodity or service needed in a future point in time based on the projected population growth for that particular market area. 2.1 SUBJECT PROPERTY MARKET AREA 5-Mile Market Area A five (5)-mile radius market area (Market Area") shown in Figure 2 on the next page was used to measure the supply/demand factors for the Subject Property. The market area is defined as the area in which similar properties compete with the subject property for tenants. It's largely determined by local demand for that particular good, but may also be influenced by how far people are willing and able to travel to obtain that product or service. The majority of self -storage market studies indicate that a five (5)-mile radius is appropriate in determining a potential self -storage facility's market area which is also equivalent to a 10- minute drive time market area (Appendices F and G, Pages 25 and — passes a ten (10)-minute drive time area (Appendix H, Page 32). Packet Pg. 256 9.B.7 Figure 2 — Subject Property Five (5)-Mile Market Area Source: ESRI ARCgis Mapping System and Consultant Figure 3 on the next page shows the location of existing competitive self -storage facilities within the Market Area as they geographically relate to the Subject Property. (Rest of Page Left Intentionally Blank) Packet Pg. 257 9.B.7 Figure 3 — Subject Property 5-Mile Market Area Competition Source: ESRI ARCgis Mapping System and Consultant Table 2 on the next page lists the ten (10) existing competitive self -storage facilities within the five (5)-mile market area. There is 1,003,487 square feet of existing self -storage square feet in the Market Area. Table 2 also includes two (2) potential vacant commercial sites that could potentially be developed as self -storage facilities (Appendix I, Page 34) There are a total of five (5) vacant parcels that could potentially be developed. However, two (2) of those parcels are very large (25+ acres) and are currently being rezoned to multi -family units and retail/warehouse space (Appendix J, Page 36) so they were not included. Two of the potential sites are side by side along Collier Boulevard to the north of the Subject Property so they were combined as one (1) potential site. A floor area ratio ("FAR") of 75,000 square feet per potential site. Packet Pg. 258 9.B.7 Table 2. Five (5)-Mile Market Area Supply of Self -Storage Square Feet Map Location Facility Street Address Square Feet 1 Cube Smart 7205 Vanderbilt Beach Rd 92,070 2 Public Storage 3807 White Lake Blvd 129,930 3 i-Storage 3836 Tollgate Blvd 126,312 4 Extra Space Storage 5304 Useppa Way 79,399 5 Extra Space Storage 8471 Davis Blvd 104,263 6 Lock Up Self Storage 13015 Livingston Road 93,024 7 Crystal Lake Storage 1078 Crystal Lake Dr. 71,120 8 StorQuest Self -Storage 8890 Founders Square Dr 110,133 9 Public Storage 8705 Addison PI Dr 105,000 10 Public Storage 7325 Davis Blvd 92,236 11 Vacant Commercial 10525 Collier Boulevard 75,000 12 Vacant Commercial 5700 Golden Gate Pkwy 75,000 1,153,487 Occupancy Rate: 96.00% 1,107,348 Source: Collier County Property Appraiser, Collier Comprehensive Planning and Consultant The total amount of existing and potential self -storage square feet in the Market Area is 1,153,487. During the initial County staff review, the reviewer requested to "please include the potential, vacant, commercial sites listed in the appendix in the demand calculations. (While self -storage is a permitted use in the Industrial Districts, please do not include these parcels in the demand calculations.)" This study incorporates the two (2) potential nearby sites in both the demand and supply side of the analysis. A vacancy rate should be applied to the supply in order to calculate a more accurate square foot demand per capita. Local self -storage facilities were reluctant to provide an occupancy rate figure while surveying the market area. Last year, the national occupancy rate increased to 94.5% (Appendix K, Page 39). The local self -storage market is much tighter than the national average due to the influx of new residents that have moved here over the past couple of years and the reduction of available existing space. A vacancy rate of 4% was used on existing self -storage properties and potential properties to determine the square foot per capita demand. With the supply side determined above, the nest step is the calculation of demand for self -storage square feet per capita in the Market Area. The total Market Area population is 113,925 according to the U.S. Census Bureau and the Environmental Services Research Institute ("ESRI"). The Market Area's demographic and income profile is located in Appendix L, Page 44. Packet Pg. 259 9.B.7 2.2 By dividing the total Market Area's occupied existing and proposed self -storage square feet by the Market Area's population, the demand of 9.72 square feet of self -storage per capita as shown in Table 3 on the next page. Table 3. Market Area Per Capita Self -Storage Square Feet 5 - Mile Population 113,925 5 - Mile Supply 1,107,348 9.72 Source: Collier County Property Appraiser, Collier Comprehensive Planning and Consultant Market Area Supply/Demand Analysis Section 2.1 in this report calculated that the current demand in the Market Area in which the Subject Property is located is 9.72 square feet per capita. That is based on the existing and proposed self -storage supply and current population. Table 4 below shows the current population in the Subject Property's Market Area along with the projected population in 2031. The County reviews GMPAs in relation to their horizon year. The County considers its horizon year as 10 years, in this case 2031 The current total self -storage square footage demand in the Market Area is 1,107,348 square feet and is anticipated to grow to 1,275,263 in 2031. Table 4. Market Area Self -Storage Square Feet Supply 2021 5-Mile 2031 5-Mile Market Market Area Area 5-Mile Market Area Population 113,925 131,200 Mile MARKET AREA DEMAND SF Storage Demand @ 9.72 SF per Capita 1,107,348 1,275,263 MARKET AREA SUPPLY Ten (10) Existing Self Storage Facilities 963,348 963,348 Two (2) Vacant Commercial Parcels 144,000 144,000 TOTAL MARKET SUPPLY 1,107,348 1,107,348 Surplus (+) / Deficit (-) 0 -167,916 Proposed Project 0 174,000 Surplus (+) / Deficit (-) 0 6,084 Allocation Ratio 1.00 1.04 Source: US. Census, Collier County Property Appraiser, Collier Comprehensive Planning and Consultant Packet Pg. 260 9.B.7 The total existing self -storage supply currently in the Market Area is 1,107,348 square feet including potential future supply on vacant commercial parcels. The supply/demand analysis indicates that the self -storage square foot deficit will grow to 167,916 by 2031. With the addition of the Subject Property's 174,000 square feet of self -storage use, there will be a surplus of 6,084 square by 2031. The County uses a 1.15 Allocation Ratio at the horizon year of the comprehensive plan. The 1.15 Allocation Ratio is essentially a 15% increase of supply over demand when analyzing comprehensive plan changes at the horizon year, which again in the County is 10 years. The allocation ratio measures the amount of additional acreage required in relation to the directly utilized acreage to assure proper market functioning in the sale, usage and allocation of land over time. The additional acreage is required in order to maintain market level pricing and to account for the likelihood that certain lands will not be placed on the market for sale during the forecast horizon, or may be subject to future environmental or other constraints. Thus, the lands allocated in the FLUM should be considerably greater than those that will actually be used or developed. Basic economic principals have shown that markets are efficient in terms of supply and demand and the ultimate lack of available office space choices creates an impediment to the market functioning properly. One must also consider that not all of the office/commercial designation in the future land use map will be developed as such since the owners of those properties will only develop the land with uses that respond to market demand. The increased acres will maintain flexibility within the comprehensive plan, keep prices reasonable by not constraining land supply, and compensate for lands which may be unavailable for sale or subject to environmental or other development constraints. Growth management practices have suggested that the greater the time horizon of the comprehensive plan, the greater the allocation ratio needed to maintain flexibility of the comprehensive plan. Other factors that influence the residential acreage allocation ratio are the nature and speed of the developing area and the area's general exposure to growth trends in the market. Fishkind believes that to ensure proper flexibility in the comprehensive plan of a rapidly growing county like Collier, a commercial allocation ratio in the range of 2.0 is necessary to maintain planning flexibility and to account for the double counting of land uses. Although the allocation ratio figure has fluctuated over time depending who is reviewing the amendment at the state level. Packet Pg. 261 9.B.7 Recent experiences with the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity indicate that the DEO has seen and approved allocation ratios in the 1.8 to 2.4 range and in some cases even larger allocation ratios for longer forecast horizons. Otherwise, if allocation ratios are not used in the analysis, then an appropriate breakdown of the potential lands between the various land use types needs to be undertaken in order to more accurately analyze the need for a comprehensive land use change. The Subject Property's allocation ratio would be 1.04 in year 10, which is well below the County's allocation ratio requirement of 1.15. 4.0 SELF -STORAGE SERVICES CONCLUSIONS The previous data and analysis support the need for the proposed 174,000 square feet of self -storage use on the Subject Property. The addition of the Subject Property's 174,000 square feet of self -storage use would create a surplus of approximately 6,000 square feet of self -storage supply in 2031. The Market Area is currently efficient in terms of supply and demand as the Market Area is in equilibrium. Economic studies have shown that markets tend to move toward efficiency in terms of supply and demand and future supply is developed as the market grows and diversifies thus creating more demand. The Project will help fill the existing demand for self -storage services coming to the Market Area over the next ten years. Based on the analysis, there is need for increased self -storage services in the Market Area over the next 10 years to accommodate the Market Area's growth over that same time period. It should be noted that the square foot demand for storage space is much higher in the urban area of Collier County. The Naples urban area shows a demand of 16.42 square feet per capita, which is higher than the 9.72 square feet in the Subject Property's Market Area, higher than the average for the entire Collier County (9.07 square feet). Packet Pg. 262 9.B.7 APPENDIX A Q a r y 3 C R .0 L cd cG G 0 U d a t M r Co N O O O O N N O N J d r a Packet Pg. 263 East Naples sees influx of self storage facilities along U.S. 41 https://www.naplesnews.com/story/money/business/local/2019/10/16/eas... Naples Daily News LOCAL BUSINESS Boxes everywhere? Here's why Naples is seeing an increase of units R Andrew Wigdor Naples Published 7:00 a.m. ET Oct. 16, 2019 1 Updated 4:10 p.m. ET Oct. 16, 2019 East storage Development in East Naples keeps coming but not in the form some residents support. Self -storage facilities are popping up fast in Collier County, and East Naples is no exception. In particular, an influx of large storage buildings has been seen along the community's major thoroughfare, and some residents say these commodities take up prime real estate on U.S. 41 that could be better used for upscale restaurants, hotels and shopping centers. In the 12-mile stretch from Sandpiper Street to Basik Drive along U.S. 41, there are nine self -storage buildings that have been built, are being built or are proposed. Of those, four are already built, four are proposed and one is in the process of being built. The self - storage building currently being constructed is Carl's White Glove Personal Storage & Wine Vault, a three-story structure that will be over go,000 square feet. The projected opening date for the facility is Feb. 1, 2020. Bruce Nichols, the facility's wine consultant and owner of The Wine Store in Naples, defended the construction of the new storage building, saying that the "demand far outweighs supply for wine storage" in the area. "The demand is certainly there," he said. Why are storage units so hot in Southwest Florida? According to data collected by Maxwell, Hendry & Simmons, LLC, a Southwest Florida 1 of 6 Packet Pg. 264 2/28/2022, 5:42 PM East Naples sees influx of self storage facilities along U.S. 41 https://www.naplesnews.com/story/money/business/local/2019/10/16/eas... real estate appraisal firm, Collier County has approximately 9.02 square feet of storage space per person, which exceeds the national average of about 6.5 square feet of storage a a space per person. "Unlike other areas of the country, we don't have basements or other areas to store items y that have been accumulated over the years," said Gerald Hendry, a state -certified real estate appraiser with the firm, in an emailed statement. "Moreover, other storage components such as open storage for boats and RVs are in high demand as most of the communities that we have developed over the past few decades are deed restricted with no options for this type of storage." In Lee and Collier County within the past 12 months, approximately 2,30o apartment units have been constructed and 3,700 units are under construction, Hendry noted. "These units are all small with limited storage," he said. "Twenty years ago, everyone had a 'junk drawer' in their house. It now seems as if everyone has a 'junk unit' in a storage facility." According to Collier County hearing examiner Mark Strain, East Naples starting seeing an influx of self -storage units in the past few years. Strain said that in the area of East Naples along U.S. 41, there is a decent amount of property already designated as General Commercial Districts, or C-4, and Heavy Commercial Districts, C-5, making much of the unused land "shovel -ready." C-4 allows self storage as conditional uses, and C-5 allows the commodities as permitted uses. "Those two zoning districts are easier to locate self storage in than many others," Strain said. "Plus, the land prices might be a little less expensive there than other parts of the county." "Zoning takes a long period of time to go through to change, and if you already have the zoning, that's a big plus," he added. "There is a lot of commercial zoning from end to end in East Naples." Strain said that if a developer was to build a 100,00o square foot office building, they may have to provide over 2O0 parking spaces. However, if a developer was to build a self - storage facility of the same size, they could possibly have less than 15. 2 of 6 Packet Pg. 265 2/28/2022, 5:42 PM 9.B.7 APPENDIX B Q a r y 3 C R .0 L cd cG G 0 U d a t M r Co N O O O O N N O N J d r a Packet Pg. 266 9.B.7 - - f 3 '4 n J 5 � Packet Pg. 267 9.B.7 APPENDIX C Q a r y 3 C R .0 L cd cG G 0 U d a t M r Co N O O O O N N O N J d r a Packet Pg. 268 Developer makes big gains in self -storage I Business Observer I Busines.. https://www.businessobserverfl. com/article/developer-makes-big-gains-i... 9.B.7 0 PR ` AR Pnlll RmrnP1Ai nrAl rOTATr BUSINESS OBSERVER THURSDAY, OCT. 29, 2020 1 year ago Developer makes big gains in self -storage SHARE f W 0 COMMENTS D r It doesn't have the sizzle of multimillion -dollar construction projects. But self -storage done right, discovers one area firm, could deliver a tidy profit. by: Mark Gordon I Managing Editor Seagate Development Group has built a brand in the Southwest Florida construction market by building corporate headquarters. The recent list includes a 150,000-square-foot complex for cancer screening firm NeoGenomics, a $60 million project in Fort Myers; a 52,000-square-foot facility for Conditioned Air of Naples; and a new, $11 million home in Fort Myers for logistics firm Scotlynn USA. Although those projects grab headlines, and of course bring in revenue for the $65.5 million company, Seagate is, more quietly, developing a profitable niche `The next 10, 20 years in Southwest Florida have a really long runway. KT _E 1 of 8 Packet Pg. 269 2/28/2022, 6:16 PM Developer makes big gains in self -storage I Business Observer I Busines... https://www.businessobserverfl.com/article/developer-makes-big-gains-i... 9.B.7 Q terms of reaching profitable rent stabilization, company executives say — including one that opened in April, a during the depths of pandemic stay-at-home orders. "Self -storage will always be big in Florida because of the lack of basements, and the extra storage space in an attic is too hot," Seagate CEO Matt Price says. "There are a lot of people, and there's not a lot of places to put stuff." It helps that Seagate attacked the self -storage market with a counterintuitive twist. The traditional way developers build self -storage is to go near, next to or across the street from multifamily projects. Those are infill projects that, Price says, go where the "bodies are." Instead of that, Price says Seagate aims to build self - storage facilities "where the bodies are going to be." In that way, the company's approach is data -driven on making the right land purchases as to where development is going to happen next in the Lee -Collier area. Combined, it paid around $3 million for the land where it built its first three self -storage facilities. Those locations are University Storage in Estero, a 90,000-square-foot, three-story, 600-unit facility; Ave Maria, a 51,000-square-foot, one-story, two -building facility; and Arbor Towne in Fort Myers, a 76,000-square-foot, 654-unit facility. Through Oct. 21, those facilities were 53.44%, 55.48% and 71.7% leased out, respectively. The goal is to get to PREV cupancy in each facility, which, says Bill Price, Seagate's chairman and Matt Price's father, wout NEXT ARTICLE ARTICLE profit. "One of the best parts about the business is once you sign the lease, people tend to stay," B_. Price says. "It's very, very much an inertia business: Once you're are in, you tend to stay in." Courtesy. Seagate Development Group's Arbor Towne self -storage facility is on Colonial Boulevard in Fort Myers. Not only does Seagate look at future population patterns, but also the nitty-gritty of self -storage, adds Bill Price, is in the ground cost per - buildable square foot. That's the combination of the cost per square foot for the land and cost per square foot to build the facility. Too high a figure, and the building can't set competitive lease rates. "That's really important," Bill Price says. Another key to Seagate's model, the elder Price says, is to partner with the right self -storage flag. For Seagate, that's CubeSmart, a Pennsylvania - based Real Estate Investment Trust that manages some 500 self -storage properties nationwide, covering more than 35 million rentable square feet. Working with CubeSmart is a nod to another lesson the company has learned: Stick to your strengths. "We quickly realized we had no clue how to do all this," Bill Price says. "We needed a sophisticated company with data algorithms" that could handle leasing, pricing, marketing Packet Pg. 270 2 of 8 2/28/2022, 6:16 PM Developer makes big gains in self -storage I Business Observer I Busines.. https://www.businessobserverfl. com/article/developer-makes-big-gains-i... 9.B.7 0 Seagate was approached by a business partner three years ago about self -storage opportunities. The firm did research and due diligence for eight months. "We really wanted to understand the complexities of the business," Matt Price says. area in the country.' Matt Price, Seagate Development Group With that understanding and the early success, the company plans to expand its self -storage portfolio. It's looking "seriously" at two possible deals, Matt Price says, and if "the land part makes sense, we will consider doing it." In the meantime, the company isn't slowing down on its headquarters or other projects. Like many peers in construction, 2020 was going really well until the coronavirus derailed it. "It hasn't been as bad as we thought," Matt Price says of the ensuing pandemic, "but we are aren't having the kind of year it was going to be before COVID-19." Long-term, Price remains all -in on the region's potential. "The next 10, 20 years in Southwest Florida have a really long runway," Price says. " I wouldn't trade our Southwest Florida business market for most any other area in the country." PREV ` ARTICLE <-- Prev Article advertisement advertisement N EXT ARTICLE Next Article ---> 3 of 8 Packet Pg. 271 2/28/2022, 6:16 PM 9.B.7 APPENDIX D Q a r y 3 C R .0 L cd cG G 0 U d a t M r Co N O O O O N N O N J d r a Packet Pg. 272 9.B.7 Demographic Estimating Conference Executive Summary December 13, 2021 The Demographic Estimating Conference met on December 13, 2021, to adopt a new population forecast. The new estimates reflect the most recent demographic and economic -related data and trends, including the 2020 Census count of population and households, revised intercensal population estimates from 2011 through 2019 based on the 2020 Census count, and the official state April 1, 2021 estimate of population. The 2020 Census population count of 21,538,187 was slightly lower than the previously adopted estimate of 21,596,068 (-57,881,-0.27%). Based on this difference and other demographic and economic data, a revised historical series was estimated for 2011 through 2019 (shown in green in the table below). Starting from the lower 2020 population level, population growth over the past year (April 1, 2020 to April 1, 2021) was estimated at 360,758 (1.67%). This was an incremental increase relative to the last conference, with the change reflecting the stronger than expected net migration. Natural increase, the other component of population growth, was more negative than expected due to increased deaths. Compared to the last conference, the short-term population projections (shown in blue in the table below) were increased, maintaining the strengthened net -migration projections throughout. In addition, natural increase is expected to remain negative throughout most of the forecast horizon as deaths continue to outpace births. Overall, the forecast keeps the pattern that the Conference has long been expecting, with growth slowing modestly each year. Average household size was adjusted to incorporate the 2020 Census data, then held relatively constant in the near -term, reflecting the economic impact from the pandemic on household dynamics and structure; all else being equal, larger household sizes lead to a lower number of households. Change from the Prior Period Change from the Prior Forecast April 1 Population Percent Numeric 2010 18,801,332 2011 18,949,860 0.79% 148,528 44,790 2012 19,134,956 0.98% 185,096 60,522 2013 19,337,590 1.06% 202,634 78,047 2014 19,585,096 1.28% 247,506 77,727 2015 19,879,230 1.50% 294,134 64,047 2016 20,201,450 1.62% 322,220 52,796 2017 20,524,865 1.60% 323,415 40,723 2018 20,854,945 1.61% 330,080 14,377 2019 21,189,849 1.61% 334,904 -18,740 2020 21,538,187 1.64% 348,338 -57,881 2021 21,898,945 1.67% 360,758 -26,840 2022 22,247,451 1.59% 348,506 2,022 2023 22,564,419 1.42% 316,968 9,415 2024 22,870,046 1.35% 305,627 17,927 2025 23,164,008 1.29% 293,962 25,455 2026 23,448,282 1.23% 284,274 31,830 2027 23,720,981 1.16% 272,699 37,515 2028 23,982,341 1.10% 261,360 43,765 2029 24,232,373 1.04% 250,032 48,354 2030 24,471,129 0.99% 238,756 52,002 2031 24,699,012 0.93% 227,883 54,952 Between April 1, 2021 and April 1, 2026, population growth is expected to average 309,867 net new residents per year (849 per day), representing a compound growth rate of 1.41% over this five-year time horizon. These increases are analogous to adding a city about the size of Orlando every year. Packet Pg. 273 9.B.7 APPENDIX E Q a N 7 N C R L d 0 U N m Q t M r O Co N O O O O N N O N J d Q Packet Pg. 274 Countywide 1 9 B•7 COLLIER COUNTY PERMANENT POPULATION ESTIMATES and PROJECTIONS -- COUNTYWIDE •ctober Ist 2000 & 2010 - 2W FISCAL YEAR estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates projections projection projection projection projection projection projection 2000 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 COUNTYWIDE 1 257,9261 322,653 1 326,817 331,756 335,223 340,293 347,002 353,836 362,409 372,027 382,078 390,937 397,975 405,138 412,431 419,855 426,443 432,166 y a projection projection projection projection projection projection projection projection projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections .� projections M 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 V- COUNTYWIDE 437,966 443,844 449,801 455,246 460,166 465,138 470,165 475,246 479,951 484,272 488,632 493,031 497,470 501,601 505,417 509,262 513,137 517,04TJ °0 O N O O O O N N O N J D_ COLLIER COUNTY PERMANENT POPULATION ESTIMATES and PROJECTIONS -- COUNTYWIDE CENSUS YEAR (Decennial) O 00 estimate estimate estimate estimate estimate estimate estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates projections projection projection projection projection projection projection 2000 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 If- N COUNTYWIDE 1 251,3771 321,520 1 323,785 1 329,849 1 333,663 1 336,783 1 343,802 1 350,202 1 357,470 1 367,347 1 376,706 1 387,450 1 394,424 1 401,525 1 408,752 1 416,110 1 423,600 1 429,285 435,047 7 projection projection projection projection projection projection projection projection projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections r U) 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 d COUNTYWIDE 440,885 446,802 452,800 457,693 462,639 467,638 472,691 477,800 482,102 486,442 490,821 495,240 499,700 503,502 507,332 511,192 515,081 519,000 Y L C� G L notes: O 1) Estimates and projections are derived from data obtained from: 2000 Census and 2010 Census; Bureau of Economic and Business Research (BEBR) population bulletins; Collier County Comprehensive Planning staff; and, Planning staff from Naples and Marco Island. U) 2) Based upon BEBR Medium Range growth rate projections. w N U) N Prepared by Collier County Comprehensive Zoning Division, June 19, 2021. R Q G:\CDES Planning Services\Comprehensive\POPULATION\2021 Population\00 2021 pop est. & proj. _Countywide FNL_PRINT Packet Pg. 275 9.B.7 APPENDIX F Q a r y 3 C R .0 L cd cG G 0 U d a t M r Co N O O O O N N O N J d r a Packet Pg. 276 9.B.7 Intr. Self St Brought SELF STORAGE ASSOCIATION M ONLINE [VERSITY Distance Learning Center Packet Pg. 277 9.B.7 5EJ SIORk ASS�G, Understanding the Customer Base ❑ Vast majority of customers are individuals storing residential goods ❑ Market growth and maturation has occurred in the self storage industry: Regular turn -over rate Residential customers: 1 - 12 months Commercial customers: 12-36 months ❑ People will pay more based upon specific advantages ❑ Tenants from 3-5 mile radius (10-20 minute drive time) Packet Pg. 278 For More Information SSA I Home Wr law SELF STORAGE y ASSOCIATION � i uY :��l-9�.9'-a-`�a�i � •L• I'r;i� • t�1�'rulb�l.[k�19. �i il� Se.li Stn3•a�,t� lnl.iit�lr}' yo-og S&AL Paf nci- �.c��a� Sralutiorta� i�w►rncr ,-Invr�t�nr� {'��« r�r Q a �L A CO 4— 3T�r�.aa ,cC E E O co a 00 www.selfstorage.org 0 e-mail. n q�pr%pitstoraQla N J a SELF STORAGE ASSOCIATION 00 ti 1900 N. Bea u rega rd Street, Ste. 110 Alexandria, VA 2231 I� -- -a is,.s _i [7vmer-Members & Invec tors view the latest infarmatibn Lo Operate your facility efficiently. Not-Yet-Me.rnbels Facility Managers Dismver all the Learn hart to- get the benefits of being an tnosL from ��A !:,bA regular member. esluLdtiuii ik Lrahmiy. Vendors Packet Pg. 279 9.B.7 APPENDIX G Q a r y 3 C R .0 L cd cG G 0 U d a t M r Co N O O O O N N O N J d r a Packet Pg. 280 The World Of Self Storage Feasibility Reports Today - Creating Wealth. http://creatingwealththroughselfstorage. com/the-world-of-self-storage-E .. .E .o co CREATING WEALTH THROUGH SELF -STORAGE The World Of Self Storage Feasibility Reports Today by Mark Helm I Oct 23, 2020 1 Buy Self Storage 1 0 comments ru, World Of Self Feasibility � A Storage Reports Today 1W 'VIM dlrEpisode 269 By Mark Helm Here is a recent article I wrote for Inside Self Storage. t .40 If there was a self storage soapbox, and I was standing on it, what you would have heard me say over the past few years was "get a feasibility report!" This statement rings louder than ever with so much new self storage still hitting the market. If you are bringing on any new square footage of self storage on a project, get a feasibility report! Given you will be spending millions, why in the world would you bring on more self storage only to not rent up or not rent up fast enough? Let's discuss feasibility reports. Packet Pg. 281 1 of 8 12/7/2022, 9:19 AM The World Of Self Storage Feasibility Reports Today - Creating Wealth... http://creatingwealththroughselfstorage.com/the-world-of-self-storage-f.. .M E c� co The first thing we should know about feasibility reports is that we are fortunate in the self storage industry today. Perhaps no other industry will have feasibility reports that are so accurate. Think about office buildings or retail centers. People will drive across town to work or shop. That is why, in these sectors, it is much harder to determine the market area accurately. In self storage, no one drives across town to rent a storage unit in most cases. People rent storage where they live or work. It is much easier to quantify who and where your customers are for self storage. In our portfolio, 86% of our customers live 3.2 miles from our facilities. If you know your market area and where your customers are, next, you have to determine how much existing self storage there already is in your market area. That is easy enough for someone to do as well. Once you get your current demand (how many customers there are in a subject properties market area) and how much supply there is (how much self storage already exist in a subject facilities market area), then all you need to know is how much self storage per person is normally used in that city or state. How To Choose a Provider All of this sounds easy, but there are good feasibility reports, and there are bad feasibility reports. I have seen plenty of bad feasibility reports over the years. My suggestion is to ask for and review a feasibility report that the provider has already 2of8 Packet Pg. 282 12/7/2022, 9:19 AM 9.B.7 APPENDIX H Q a r y 3 C R .0 L cd cG G 0 U d a t M r Co N O O O O N N O N J d r a Packet Pg. 283 9.B.7 Five (5)-Mile Radius Market Area and 10-Minute Drive Time Map Packet Pg. 284 9.B.7 APPENDIX I Q a r y 3 C R .0 L cd cG G 0 U d a t M r Co N O O O O N N O N J d r a Packet Pg. 285 9.B.7 Comparable Vacant Parcels with the potential to be developed as Self -Storage in 3-Mile Market Area FID ACRES_GIS O_NAME1 S_ADDRESS S_CITY S_ZIPCODE LUSE LUSE_D 34696 25.57 VICTORIA ESTATES LTD ET AL 10525 COLLIER BLVD NAPLES 34116 10 Vacant Commercial 34673 25.09 1-75 ASSOCIATES LLC 10567 COLLIER BLVD NAPLES 34116 10 Vacant Commercial 73965 15.04 CG II LLC 40 Vacant Industrial 73953 9.57 CG II LLC NAPLES 34117 40 Vacant Industrial 73955 7.73 CG II LLC 3945 CITY GATE BLVD N NAPLES 34117 40 Vacant Industrial 73966 6.89 850 NWN LLC 40 Vacant Industrial 99436 6.82 JOSEPH A ROSIN REV TRUST NAPLES 34116 10 Vacant Commercial 73946 4.99 850 NWN LLC NAPLES 34117 40 Vacant Industrial 4732 4.74 ROBERT E WILLIAMS TRUST NAPLES 34119 99 Acreage not zoned agricultural 91601 4.74 ROBERT E WILLIAMS TRUST NAPLES 34119 99 Acreage not zoned agricultural Source: Collier County Property Appraiser, ESRI and Consultant Above parcel list highlighted in Yellow in 3-Mile Market Area r i I'1 F 1 1 111 11I'm- - l _ _ I yLIr I I cT { 1 I I 1 •, p' � _ - -- : ?1 + �•��_"�' I ICI . - :. - - 9 - ■.■�1�11■ - �jf - �W no I fir_ • 'll��llllali� ICI=I 111111511 ''I ' I.,' rw Source: Collier County Property Appraiser, ESRI and Consultant r_ Packet Pg. 286 9.B.7 APPENDIX ) Q a r y 3 C R .0 L cd cG G 0 U d a t M r Co N O O O O N N O N J d r a Packet Pg. 287 9.B.7 1 r� ..... ..Y v T� I IIIII a .....�... 1-- --- -- �_:- ---------------- / J � V L�r1 w ABERCIA-NORTH �� 6EMDERSOH MASTER SITE PLAN eer«vr. �Nr Packet Pg. 288 9 , i,1l�;��= Kimley>»Horn JUU sEP 1 zozz NOTICE OF NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION ME PROJECT NAME: Golden Gate Commerce Park Planned Unit Development Amendment (PL20210000150) and Collier Boulevard Mixed -Use Commerce Center Planned Unit Development Amendment (PL20210000419) A Neighborhood Information Meeting hosted by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. representing Benderson Development Company (Applicant) will be held Monday, September 121h at 6 p.m. at SpringHill Suites by Marriott Naples (3798 White Lake Blvd), Naples. The meeting will also be available virtually (via Zoom). Please visit from your computer, tablet, or smartphone: Join Zoom Webinar by computer or tablet hftps:Ilkimley-horn.zoom.us/s/91210570798 If you would like to obtain additional information, please contact Philip DiMaria, Senior Planner with Kimley- Horn and Associates, Inc. by email: Philip.dimaria@kimley-horn.com or phone: 941-379-7600. The Applicant has submitted formal petitions to Collier County, seeking approval of Planned Unit Development (PUD) amendments. The PUD amendments propose to permit the Fabricated Metal Products (3411-3479, 3484, 3491-3499) use in the Golden Gate (Golden Gate) Commerce Park PUD and an additional 413 residential dwelling units in the Collier Boulevard (Collier Boulevard) Mixed -Use Commerce Center PUD. These two PUDs are companion petitions. The Golden Gate PUD subject property is comprised of approximately 74 acres of land and is located on the northwest corner of Collier Boulevard and Magnolia Pond Drive. The Collier Boulevard PUD subject property is comprised of approximately 70.2 acres of land is located on the southwest corner of Collier Boulevard and Magnolia Pond Drive. Please be advised that any information provided is subject to change until final approval by the governing authority. The Neighborhood Information Meeting is for informational purposes, it is not a public hearing. The meeting will be recorded. Packet Pg. 289 9.B.7 APPENDIX K Q a r y 3 C R .0 L cd cG G 0 U d a t M r Co N O O O O N N O N J d r a Packet Pg. 290 9.B.7 Q a r r N 7 N C R u L d E E 0 U N m Q t M r O Co N O O O O N N O N J d Q Packet Pg. 291 Demand Growth Stabilizes Following Pandemic -Induced Surgewith Oversupply Concerns in the Rearview Mirror Storage sector poised to sustain strong performance as demand normalizes. Self -stor- age properties have delivered record performance over the past two years as lifestyles adapted to the pandemic. The closure of offices and college campuses as well as other lockdowns prompted many households to place belongings in storage units as they turned spare rooms and garages into home classrooms, offices and gyms. Between March 2020 and September 2021, self -storage vacancy fell by 460 basis points to a record low of 5.5 percent. The rapid drop in availability has restored rent growth after the surge of development in 2018 and 2019 added 142 million square feet to the sector, weighing on asking rates. Since the onset of the health crisis, the national average marketed rent for a standard 10-foot-by-10-foot unit has increased by 13 percent. Moving forward, the pace of rent growth is projected to moderate as some pandemic -specific demand drivers dissipate. Even as many places reopen, not every home office or garage gym will be taken down. At the same time, the tight labor market is lifting income, supporting robust household formation and elevated retail spending. All of these factors bode well for self -storage properties in the coming year. Demographic and pandemic -motivated relocations fostering storage use. The un- tethering of numerous office workers has accelerated a migration trend that was already underway as more millennials age into common family formation years. Millennials represent both the largest and most active share of self -storage renters, making their life- style changes especially relevant for self -storage owners. Many households are relocating to larger accommodations in nearby suburban settings or in new markets that offer other advantages such as temperate weather. Self -storage properties in satellite cities and the Sun Belt are benefiting as a result. While representing a smaller proportion of self -stor- age users, retiring baby boomers are also supporting storage demand, especially in mar- kets with low tax burdens. As older households downsize, they often hold onto worldly possessions by placing them in storage. These two demographic trends will underpin self -storage needs for the foreseeable future, even as demand and supply rebalance fol- lowing the health and economic shocks of the past two years. 2022 National Self -Storage Outlook • Ravenous demand for recreational vehicles a potential boon for storage. Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, demand has skyrocketed for recreational vehicles (RVs), with manufacturers struggling to keep up. The return to offices as well as other forms of travel such as cruises may prompt people to park these RVs, leading to in- creased demand for covered vehicle storage space at self -storage facilities. • Online portals an increasingly important factor for customers and operators. More self -storage operators are adapting to "touchless" business models encouraged by the pandemic and favored by the next generation of renters. These users expect to be able to find, lease and pay for a unit entirely online. Businesses also benefit from this prac- tice by allowing easier off -hour leasing. • Near -term oversupply risk tempered by supply shortages. Deliveries for this year will remain well below recent peaks. A shortage of materials and labor is affecting timelines. In some cases projects cannot find the materials needed to finish. Further on the horizon, development is likely to increase again as these hurdles are overcome. Construction Trends Completions Y-O-YPercentChange 80 8% y so I s% o ao ' ' I a% ozo � 2% Nil:F,1I� 0% 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 20 22* Vacancy Rate Trends 20% n 15% x U 0 10% 5% 0% 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 20 22* Rent Growth Trends — Average Rent — Y-O-YPercentChange o $1.60 12% w $1.20 8% $0.80 4% c a $0.40 0% $o IMUN-4% 17 18 18 20 21 22* — Population Growth Projections: 2022-2026* V. Namew PoPulat�ion Growth JAR �o *Foreca, Packet Pg. 292 Influx of RPzidents DrivinLy Self-Stnrnoe Use Population and Self -Storage Rent Growth 2019-2022* 3% •20%- 25% 4.5% 6.5% • > 25% Top 10 Markets by Population Growth 2019-2022* Drivers of Record Rent Growth Wave Austin 6.0% 9.3% Las Vegas 5.1% 16.5% Phoenix 4.4% 17.9% Orlando 4.3% 12.0% Raleigh 4.3% 8.0% Dallas -Fort Worth 4.1% 10.1% Salt Lake City 4.0% 5.1% West Palm Beach 3.8% 13.5% San Antonio 3.5% 8.5% Charlotte 3.5% 9.2% U.S. 1.4% 10.2% *Forecast Sources: Marcus & Millichap Research Services; Moody's Analytics; U.S. Census Bureau; Yardi Matrix • After falling by nearly 9 percent between June 2016 and June 2020, the average asking rent for a standard 10-foot-by-10-foo unit in the U.S. has increased by over 13 percent. This rapid rise in rents has more than compensated for the downward pressure on marketed rates caused by record completions in 2018 and 2019. Population growth is a supporting factor in many regions, including the Southwest and Southeast, as well as Texas and parts of the Rocky Mountain zone. • Markets that experienced some of the largest inventory gains over the past five years, including Austin, Phoenix and Orlan- do, are all now reporting a recovery in rents, aided by robust migration trends that coincided with the deliveries. • Rent growth last year was most pronounced in Florida, a prominent relocation destination. Asking rates jumped by more than 15 percent in Miami -Dade, Fort Lauderdale and Jacksonville. Nearby Atlanta also saw rates go up 16 percent. Packet Pg. 293 Tight Housing Markets Drive Self -Storage Use Multiple Factors Show Link Between Residential Demand and Storage Utilization In -Demand Housing Markets Tend to Have Lower Vacancy Rates 9% 8% Salt Lake City x • • 7% C • 6% • • • • 5% • • • • New York Chicago • • • 4% • • i • •• Austin • Los Angeles 3% • • N • 2% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 2021 Single -Family Home Price Growth Apartment Rent Growth Strongly Correlated With Vacancy 9% 8; 8/ Salt Lake City � • c�i • 7% v cs • d6% • • • • 0] • • 0 5% • • • Chicago • • • New York •• • • •Austin • 4% • t •• • • N Los Angeles N 3% • 2% 4% 9% 14% 19% 24% 29% 2021 Apartment Rent Growth Factors Behind Strong Housing/Storage Needs Housing and storage demand linked. Multiple vectors show a clear connection between competitive residential markets and places with abundant self -storage needs. In metros where home prices and apartment rents are both growing rapidly, self -storage vacancy is low and self -storage rents are readily climbing. There are two main factors behind this relationship. • Population Growth: Some of the markets that have been recording substantial home price and rent growth since the pandemic began, including Phoenix and West Palm Beach, are welcoming waves of new residents, driving the demand for housing. Relocations such as these represent the second most common reason to rent storage units. • Limited Space: Metros with climbing home prices emphasize the benefits of multifamily living. A higher preponderance of apartment renting, where unused space comes at a premium, underscores the utility of a separate storage unit. Self -Storage and Apartment Rent Growth Linked 6% 7% 0 6% 5% *Chicago obi • • •Austin 4% • • Salt Lake City • • • • Los Angeles • 2% • • N • • I% �N New York 0% • 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 2021 Apartment Rent Growth Self -Storage and Apartment Vacancy Rates Trend in Tandum — Self -Storage —Apartment 20% 12% 4% 0% 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 20 22` Top Markets by Home Price/Rent Growth In 2021 Austin 28.8% Phoenix 28.1% Salt Lake City 23.7% Tampa -St. Petersburg 27.9% Phoenix 22.0% South Florida 25.5% Los Angeles 19.3% Orlando 25.2% Riverside -San Bernardino 19.2% Orange County 18.8% Bay Area 17.8% Tampa -St. Petersburg 17.8% Sacramento 17.7% Denver 17.1% United States 15.2% Austin 24.8% Las Vegas 24.6% Atlanta 22.7% Salt Lake City 21.6% Riverside -San Bernardino 18.0% San Diego 17.9% United States 15.5% *Foreca. Sources: Marcus & Millichap Research Services; CoStar Group; RealPage, Inc; U.S. Census Burem Radius+: Yardi Matri Packet Pg. 294 9.B.7 APPENDIX L Q a r y 3 C R .0 L cd cG G 0 U d a t M r Co N O O O O N N O N J d r a Packet Pg. 295 9.B.7 +1��►� Ik Aki Subject Site Collier Blvd, Naples, Florida, 34116 Ring: 5 mile radius Prepared by Esri Latitude: 26.20419 Longitude:-81.68798 Summary Census 2010 Census 2020 2022 Population 96,414 111,466 Households 37,228 44,078 Families 26,513 - Average Household Size 2.58 2.52 Owner Occupied Housing Units 25,049 - Renter Occupied Housing Units 12,179 - Median Age 40.9 - ©2022 Esri Source: Esri forecasts for 2022. U.S. Census Bureau 2010 decennial Census data converted by Esri into 2020 geography. 113,925 45,440 31,584 2.50 31,642 13,798 44.7 Packet Pg. 296 9.B.8 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING .NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCES Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) at 9:00 A.M. December 12, 2023, in the Board of County Commissioners meeting room, third floor, Collier Government Center, Mg East onTamiami Trail; Naples FL to consider: AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 89-05 AS AMENDED. THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN`. FOR THE IINtNCORPdRATFn ARFA U1. COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, SPECIFICALLY AMENDING: THE URBAN GOLDEN GATE. ESTATES SUB -ELEMENT OF THE GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN ELEMENT AND URBAN GOLDEN GATE AREA FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND MAP SERIES BY CHANGING THE DESIGNATION FROM ESTATES -MIXED USE DISTRICTS. RESIDENTIAL ESTATES SUBDISTRICT TO THE ESTATES -COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, 13TH AVENUE SW COMMERCIAL INFILL SUBDISTRICT TO ALLOW UPTO 171,500 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF SELF -STORAGE AND MINL-WAREHOUSING'(SIC 4225); AND FURTHERMORE, DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE ADOPTED AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY CONSISTING OF 5.53s ACRES IS LOCATED SOUTHWEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF 13TH AVENUE SW AND COLLIER BOULEVARD, NORTH OF GREEN BOULEVARD IN SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, ,RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. [PL20220000289] AND AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 04-41, AS AMENDED; THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE; WHICH INCLUDES THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULAT101i5 FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING1114E APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM THE ESTATES (E) ZONING DISTRICT TO A COMMERCIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (CPUD) ZONING DISTRICT FOR A PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS 405013TH AVENUE COMMERCIAL PLANNED UNITDEVELOPMENT TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT OF UP TO 171,500 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR- AREA. OF SELF -STORAGE AND MINI WAREHOUSING (SIC 4225). THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED SOUTHWEST. OF' THE INTERSECTION OF 13TH AVENUE SW AND COLLIER BOULEVARD, NORTH OF GREEN BOULEVARD IN SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA CONSISTING OF 5.53: ACRES; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF RESOLUTION NOS. 00-444, 04-60, 00-188, 06-306 AND 07-338 RELATING TO A CONDITIONAL USE FOR A MODEL, HOME AND SALES CENTER; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. IPL202100033211 A copy of the proposed Ordinances is on file with the Clerk to the Board and is available for inspection. All interested parties are invited to attend and be heard. All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County Manager prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to three (3) minutes on any item. The selection of any individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. if recognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted ten (10) minutes to speak on an item. Written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. All materials used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. As part of an ongoing initiative to encourage public involvement, the public will have the opportunity to provide public comments remotely, as well as in person, during this proceeding. Individuals who would like to participate remotely should register through the link provided within the specific event/meeting entry on the Calendar of Events on the County webste at www.colliercountyfl.gov/ our-county/visitors/calendar-of-events after the agenda is posted on the County website. Registration should be done in advance of the public meeting, or any deadline spaded within the public meeting notice. Individuals who register will receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how they can participate remotely in this meeting. Remote participation is provided as a courtesy and is at the user's risk. The County is not responsible for technical issues. For additional information about the meeting, please call Geoffrey Willig at 252-8369 or email to Geoffrey.WiillgUcolliercountyfl:gov.:. . Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-6380, at least two (2) days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County. Commissioners Office. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA RICK LOCASTRO; CHAIRMAN CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT & COMPTROLLER L_ Z 9 r m (A Z !+f IA 'r1 0 0 Z 0 n z 0 M m to N d N 0 N 4J a n By: Jennifer Hansen, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) Packet Pg. 297 ENGINEERING 4050 13th Ave Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) NARRATIVE STATEMENT The subject property consists of two parcels totaling 5.53± acres of land (Property ID No's.: 37931080007; 37931120006) located southwest of the intersection of 131h Ave and Collier Blvd (See figure 1). The specific address is 4050 13th Avenue SW, Naples, FL 34116. The owner of this subject property is 4050 131h Ave LLC, and the applicant for this Commercial Planned Unit Development Rezone (PUDZ) is Shamrock Builders Inc. The zoning and existing land uses surrounding the property are as follows: • North: Zoned Estates, developed single-family residential lots. • South: Zoned PUD, developed FPL Service Center & Electrical Sub Station. • East: Across Collier Boulevard and single-family residential lots beyond, Zoned Estates, developed • West: Zoned PUD, FP&L Substation. The property is located within the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP). The Future Land Use Map (FLUM) designation is Estates (E) and is subject to a companion small scale Growth Management Plan Amendment requesting the establishment of the 13th Ave SW Commercial Infill Subdistrict. The current zoning district is Estate District (E). The Applicant is requesting a rezone of the subject property from Estates to Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD). The proposed CPUD will be consistent and compliant with the proposed subdistrict. The following narrative and attached materials address applicable criteria in accordance with LDC subsections 10.02.13 B and 10.02.08 F and Chapter 3 G. of the Administrative Code. 4050 13th Ave CPUD PUDZ-PL 20210003321 Page 1 of 10 February 8, 2023 FPL SUBSTATION JRM�4-" ENGINEERING ± 505 FT ± 410 FT ± 280 FT �•C x. FPL SUBSTATION & SERVICE CENTER -r Y. e h� -r — — r SUBJECT PROPERTY 'lah AVE . r •z �x Figure 1. Subject Property Location Map a. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. The subject property is mostly vacant with an abandoned single-family home located on the northern parcel. It has a current zoning designation of Estates (E), however, the property is located on the fringe of a commercial node and bounded by an FPL Service Center and FPL Substation to the south and FPL Substation to the west. The subject property is adjacent to Collier Blvd public right-of-way to the east and 13t" Ave SW public right-of-way to the north. See Table 1 below. 4050 13th Ave CPUD PUDZ-PL 20210003321 Page 2 of 10 February 8, 2023 ENGINEERING Table 1: Surrounding Area Analysis — Golden Gate Area Master Plan Future Land Use District Zoning District Existing Uses NORTH Estates — Mixed Use Estates 13 Ave SW District, Residential road; Single-family Estates Subdistrict Residential beyond SOUTH Estates — Mixed Use PUD FPL Service Center & Sub District, Residential Station Estates Subdistrict EAST Estates — Mixed Use Estates Public right-of-way; District, Residential Single-family Residential Estates Subdistrict WEST Estates — Mixed Use PUD FPL Sub Station; Single - District, Residential family Residential beyond Estates Subdistrict The 131h Ave CPUD will allow a self -storage facility (SIC 4225) with a maximum of 174,000 SF of gross leasable floor area on approximately 5.53± acres. The subject property is located within the Golden Gate Area Master Plan and designated as Estates — Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict on the Urban Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map (FLUM). As explained in the companion GMPA, there are numerous reasons why this proposed use in this specific location is appropriate. However, as it is often said, "a picture paints a thousand words." The following aerial map (Figure 1) shows how the subject property is surrounded on two sides by sizeable electric substations and an FPL Service Center that represent intense public facility/utility uses. Moreover, on the two other sides, the property is cut off from adjoining uses by roads, essentially creating a small, isolated island unsuitable for residential use which is the intended use for this property per the current FLU category and zoning district. If not for the companion GMPA to allow for a complementary and compatible commercial use, this property has effectively been stripped of any feasible residential development opportunity and full economic utility. The proposed CPUD is consistent with the need to provide goods and services to area residents and is restricted solely to the mini self -storage use. The commercial needs analysis demonstrates that there is significant demand for self -storage, which is a localized, neighborhood level commercial use. The exclusive self -storage use is low impact in nature and compatible with surrounding properties. The site will be designed and buffered to minimize visual impacts. The site is ideal for the proposed use and pattern of development being proposed. The property is in close proximity to an existing commercial node to the south and is "sandwiched" between an FPL Service Station and FPL Sub Station immediately south (Figure 2) and FPL Substation to the west (Figure 3). A rezone to Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) will allow for an appropriate use on the property that is compatible with the more intense public facility uses and the less intense residential uses in the general area. The use will also create a fitting transition from a more intense non-residential and commercial area to the south and residential area immediately north. 4050 13th Ave CPUD PUDZ-PL 20210003321 Page 3 of 10 February 8, 2023 JRM��' ENGINEERING Figure 2. FPL Service Station (South) VFW MOT OL mod' • Figure 3. FPL Substation (West) Lastly, all necessary utility infrastructure is in close proximity and will be extended to the property in order to support the proposed commercial development. 4050 13th Ave CPUD PUDZ-PL 20210003321 Page 4 of 10 February 8, 2023 JRM�-" ENGINEERING b. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at a public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the county attorney. A Covenant of Unified Control has been provided by the current owner. The applicant, Shamrock Builders Inc., is the contract purchaser for the entire ±5.53-acre subject property. Operation and maintenance responsibility for shall be assumed by Shamrock Builders or potential assignees. Moreover, the proposed CPUD documents make appropriate provisions for the continued operation and maintenance of common areas. c. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. (This is to include identifying what Sub -district, policy or other provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that Sub -district, policy or other provision.) 1. 13' Ave SW Commercial lnfill Subdistrict There is a companion GMPA application to amend the Estates — Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict on the Urban Golden Gate Estates FLUM in order to create a new subdistrict identified as the 131h Ave SW Commercial lnfill Subdistrict. The property is located immediately north of the Golden Gate Estates Commercial lnfill Subdistrict and the Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict. The proposed use will provide a compatible and transitional use adjacent to existing commercial and residential development. Increased setbacks, architectural standards, and buffering will ensure preservation and compatibility with adjacent residential and commercial uses 11. Further Compliance with GMP Provisions Policy 1.1: Unless otherwise permitted in this Growth Management Plan, new or revised uses of land shall be consistent with designations outlined on the Future Land Use Map. and Policy 5.3: All rezonings must be consistent with this Growth Management Plan... A companion GMPA application has been requested to amend the Subdistrict and create the 13th Ave Commercial lnfill Subdistrict to ensure compliance between the GMP and the PUD zoning. Policy 5.5: Discourage unacceptable levels of urban sprawl in order to minimize the cost of community facilities by: confining urban intensity development to areas designated as Urban on the Future Land Use Map; requiring that any additions to the Urban Designated Areas be contiguous to an existing Urban Area boundary; and, encouraging the use of creative land use planning techniques and innovative approaches to development in the County's Agricultural/Rural designated area, which will better serve 4050 13th Ave CPUD PUDZ-PL 20210003321 Page 5 of 10 February 8, 2023 ENGINEERING to protect environmentally sensitive areas, maintain the economic viability of agriculture and other predominantly rural land uses and provide for cost efficient delivery of public facilities and services. The location of this CPUD and self -storage use is ideal. The subject property is located off a major arterial and fully buffered from all surrounding residential uses. To the west of the property, the closest residence is over 500' away and the intervening substation property provides over 410' of buffering. To the south, the FPL Service Center and substation abut the property, further south is the Healthcare Network's Children's Care facility, and beyond that is Green Boulevard and various commercial uses. To the north, the property abuts 13th Avenue SW and beyond that is one single-family home. To the east Collier Boulevard and the parallel canal system create over 280' of separation from the nearest residential properties. Additionally, the subject property abuts the Urban Estates designation which encompasses Golden Gate City and allows greater density and non-residential intensity than the Rural Estates designation. The proposed CPUD also represents a logical extension of non-residential uses from Green Boulevard to 13th Avenue SW. This extension of uses creates an intensity gradient from the high -traffic healthcare facility to the more passive but impactful FPL facility and culminating with a low impact self -storage use. Proximity to Golden Gate City creates significant demand for self -storage space as demonstrated by the market study and the proposed commercial use is consistent with the numerous commercial uses that line the west side of the 951 corridor along much of the Golden Gate City urban area. This CPUD will extend public infrastructure to the subject property and represents a cost effective and efficient delivery of existing public facilities and infrastructure. Policy 5.6: New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code (Ordinance 04-41, adopted June 22, 2004 and effective October 18, 2004, as amended). The passive nature of the proposed use, the ample separation from surrounding residential uses, setbacks, buffers, site design, landscaping and proposed architecture ensure compatibility with surrounding uses and result in a quality project that will be an asset to the neighborhood. The proposed use complements existing commercial and residential uses in the area and will provide a service/facility that will meet the needs of neighboring communities and businesses as supported by the market study. It will be consistent with the LDC's architectural and site design standards. The facility will be "fortress - style," internalized and self-contained. Building will be limited to three -stories and 35', the architecture will incorporate residential design elements, lighting will be shielded, the property will be gated, the facility will have on site security and access will be controlled to further ensure compatibility with surrounding uses. Objective 7. Promote smart growth policies, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and adhere to the existing development character of the Collier County, where applicable. 4050 13th Ave CPUD PUDZ-PL 20210003321 Page b of 10 February 8, 2023 ENGINEERING Policy 7.1: The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. As demonstrated by the market study, the proposed development will provide needed self -storage in the area. The self -storage market is localized and serves residences and small business with a close vicinity. Providing this type of us on the subject property will reduce vehicle miles traveled as Golden Gate Estates area residents will have shortened trips to and from their storage units. The subdistrict's location along 951 is appropriate for a commercial use and the major arterial recently widened in this location ensures ample capacity for this low trip -generating use. Moreover, the project's only access along 13th Avenue SW ensures safe turning movements into the project from a local road rather than 951 and provides sufficient queuing from the project's entrance to the 951 intersection. The close proximity to the 951 intersection also ensures that the commercial traffic associated with the proposed subdistrict does not encroach into the adjacent residential neighborhood. From 13th Avenue SW, only left and right -in and right -out turning movements will be allowed, thus minimizing potential turning conflicts. This segment of Collier Boulevard has limited access points directly onto Collier Boulevard which typically stem from existing single-family homes. As discussed with Transportation staff, the county wants to limit curb cuts along that segment of 951 and the 13t" Ave access location is a preferred alternative to 951. Policy 7.2: The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals. While this policy is more relevant to residential projects or large commercial or mixed -use developments, the proposed project will utilize an internal looped drive aisle configuration which will facilitate circulation within the project. The project will have a single access point onto 13t" Avenue SW. Policy 7.3: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and/or interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. The interconnection of local streets between developments is also addressed in Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element. The proposed project as described above is surrounded by FPL substations on two sides (South and West) negating the opportunity to connect to surrounding uses. The property fronts ROW on the other two sides. Policy 7.4: The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. Although no residential uses are proposed, the development supports walkability by connecting to the existing pedestrian and bicycle facilities that serve the surrounding area and the site is within walking distance of Collier County transit. While most employees and self -storage users will drive to the facility, 4050 13th Ave CPUD PUDZ-PL 20210003321 Page 7 of 10 February 8, 2023 JRM�-" ENGINEERING the "connecting" sidewalk is consistent with the County's regulations to connect private properties to the bike/ped network within public rights -of -way. Should an employee or self -storage user live in close proximity to the facility and choose to walk or bike to the self -storage facility, the sidewalk connection provides safe and convenient access to the proposed use. Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element notes that all rezoning applications shall consider the impacts on the overall system and shall not approve any such request that significantly impacts a roadway segment already operating and/or projected to operate at an unacceptable level of service within the five-year planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are approved. There is no significant impact associated with a roadway segment already operating and/or projected to operate at an unacceptable level of service as indicated in the TIS provided with this submittal. Policy 6.1.1:1 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) notes that for the County's Urban Designated Area, Estates Designated Area, Conservation Designated Area, and Agricultural/Rural Mixed Use District, Rural -Industrial District and Rural -Settlement Area District as designated on the FLUM, native vegetation shall be preserved through the application of the following minimum preservation and vegetation retention standards and criteria, unless the development occurs within the Area of Critical State Concern (ACSC) where the ACSC standards referenced in the Future Land Use Element shall apply. Notwithstanding the ACSC requirements, this Policy shall apply to all non- agricultural development except for single-family dwelling units situated on individual parcels that are not located within a watershed management conservation area identified in a Watershed Management Plan developed pursuant to Policies supporting Objective 2.1 of this Element. For properties not previously within the Coastal High Hazard Area but now within the Coastal High Hazard Area due to adoption of a revised Coastal High Hazard Area boundary in 2013, the native vegetation preservation and retention standards of the Non -Coastal High Hazard Area shall continue to apply. (Reference the Coastal High Hazard Area Comparison Map in the Future Land Use Element.) Consistent with this Policy, adequate native vegetation will be preserved through the application of the following minimum preservation and vegetation retention standards and criteria: Non -Coastal High Hazard Area Commercial and Industrial Development Equal to or greater than 5 acres. 15% OBJECTIVE 7.1 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) notes to direct incompatible land uses away from listed animal species and their habitats. (The County relies on the listing process of State and Federal agencies to identify species that require special protection because of their endangered, threatened, or species of special concern status. Listed animal species are those species that the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission has designated as endangered, threatened, or species of special concern, in accordance with Rules 68A-27.003, 68A-27.004, and 68A- 27.005, F.A.C. and those species designated by various federal agencies as Endangered and Threatened species published in 50 CFR 17.) 4050 13th Ave CPUD PUDZ-PL 20210003321 Page 8 of 10 February 8, 2023 JRM�-" ENGINEERING Consistent with this Objective, an EIS has been conducted for the proposed project. A Protected Species Assessment is provided. The proposed project will comply with all State and Federal listed animal species protection requirements. Consistency with GGAMP: Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element A. GOALS, OBJECTIVES and POLICIES Goal 1: TO GUIDE LAND USE AND PUBLIC FACILITY DECISION MAKING AND TO BALANCE THE NEED TO PROVIDE BASIC SERVICES WITH NATURAL RESOURCE CONCERNS THROUGH A WELL PLANNED MIX OF COMPATIBLE LAND USES WHICH ENSURE THE HEALTH, SAFETY, WELFARE, AND QUALITY OF LIFE OF THE LOCAL RESIDENTS. OBJECTIVE 1.1: Develop new or revised uses of land consistent with designations outlined on the Urban Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map. There is a companion GMPA application to amend the Estates — Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict on the Urban Golden Gate Estates FLUM in order to create a new subdistrict identified as the 131h Ave Commercial Infill Subdistrict. The property is located immediately north of the Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict and the Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict. The proposed use CPUD will be fully compliant and consistent with the proposed subdistrict. GOAL 2: TO PROVIDE FOR LIMITED COMMERCIAL SERVICES AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR PURPOSES OF SERVING THE RURAL NEEDS OF GOLDEN GATE ESTATES RESIDENTS, SHORTENING VEHICULAR TRIPS, AND PRESERVING RURAL CHARACTER. The companion GMPA and proposed CPUD further this goal. Per the Market Feasibility Study provided with this submittal, there is currently only one facility within the primary market area (±1.2 miles from the subject site). There is a demand for indoor storage facilities. The proposed indoor self -storage use will serve the storage needs of Golden Gate Estates residents. Increased setbacks and buffering will ensure preservation of and compatibility with rural neighborhoods. d. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. The proposed commercial use, site design, orientation of structures, architectural elements, proposed development standards, placement of buffering/screening, and open space provided further emphasizes its compatibility with the surrounding area. 4050 13th Ave CPUD PUDZ-PL 20210003321 Page 9 of 10 February 8, 2023 ENGINEERING e. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. The proposed development will meet or exceed the minimum 30% open space requirements of the Collier County LDC. Usable open space in the form of common areas, water management areas, preserve, buffers and landscaped areas will be provided. f. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. Water and sewer service is available. There are existing water and sewer lines in close proximity. Those lines will be extended to the subject property at the applicant's expense. Roadway capacity is adequate as confirmed by the TIS provided. Drainage is adequate for the site. Waste management, cable, electric, and telephone service are available. Payment of impact fees and timing of adequate public facilities certification are mechanisms to assure the development is appropriately serviced. g. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. The proposed low impact self -storage use is ideal for the subject property and represents and infill project that is compatible with the surrounding area. Its location along 951 and close proximately to an existing commercial node at Green Boulevard will allow an efficient and cost-effective expansion of public infrastructure. The commercial needs analysis demonstrates that there is significant demand for self - storage, which is a localized, neighborhood level commercial use and the TIS provided with this submittal illustrates adequate capacity. Furthermore, the TIS provided reflects the ability for the subject property and surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. h. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. The proposed development conforms with the intent of the PUD regulations by establishing compatible uses, development regulations and standards that are consistent with LDC 2.03.06 and with similar residential developments adjacent to and throughout Collier County. The Market Analysis Study, EIS, TIS and all required PUDZ exhibits further demonstrate conformity with PUD regulations. Furthermore, no deviations are requested for this project and there will be no deleterious impact to public health, safety and welfare from the proposed PUD. 4050 13th Ave CPUD PUDZ-PL 20210003321 Page 10 of 10 February 8, 2023 ENGINEERING Exhibit IV.B 131h Ave SW Commercial Infill Subdistrict Proposed GMPA Amendment Language Proposed Small Scale Amendment to the Collier County Future Land Use Element (FLUE) and Future Land Use Map (FLUM) related to 5.53 ± acres located to the southwest corner of the intersection at Collier Blvd and 13th Ave SW in Section 15, Township 49, Range 26, Collier County, Florida. Amend the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP), Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub Element, TABLE OF CONTENTS, B. Estates — Commercial District, Page i, as follows: .111FAl =4L•IkT1Ik6 N.Tor_wlj1.119:1Let I 1. Interchange Activity Center Subdistrict 2. Pine Ridge Road Mixed Use Subdistrict 3. Commercial Western Estates Infill Subdistrict 4. Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict 5. Southbrooke Office Subdistrict 6. 13 Ave SW Commercial Infill Subdistrict Amend the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP), Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub Element, TABLE OF CONTENTS, C. List of Maps, Page i, as follows: C. List of Maps Urban Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map Urban Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict Pine Ridge Road (CR 896) — Interchange Activity Center and Pine Ridge Road Mixed Use 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 Ave SW Commercial Infill Subdistrict on Page 1 of 4 13th Ave SW Commercial Infill Subdistrict PL20220000289 February 8, 2023 ENGINEERING Amend the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP), Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub Element, Policy 1.1.4, B. ESTATES COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, Page 1, as follows: B. ESTATES — COMMERCIAL DISTRICT 1. Interchange Activity Center Subdistrict 2. Pine Ridge Road Mixed Use Subdistrict 3. Commercial Western Estates Infill Subdistrict 4. Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict 5. Southbrooke Office Subdistrict 6. 13 Ave SW Commercial Infill Subdistrict Page 2 of 4 13th Ave SW Commercial Infill Subdistrict PL20220000289 February 8, 2023 ENGINEERING Amend the Future Land Use Designation DESCRIPTION SECTION, ESTATES DESIGNATION, B. Estates Commercial District, beginning page 14, as follows: 6. 13t" Ave SW Commercial Infill Subdistrict The 13th Ave Commercial Infill Subdistrict consists of 5.53± acres and is located at the southwest corner of the intersection of Collier Boulevard and 13th Avenue SW. The purpose of this subdistrict is to allow a mini/self-storage use that will accommodate the needs of area residents and provide a complementary, low -impact neighborhood commercial use that is compatible with the Residential Estates Subdistrict. Development within this Subdistrict shall be subject to the following: a) The development is to be in the form of a Planned Unit Development (PUD). b) The development shall be limited to a maximum of 174,000 square feet of self- storage/mini warehousing. c) Buildings shall be limited to 3 stories, and a maximum of 38 feet, zoned height. d) Access to the subdistrict shall be limited exclusively to Collier Boulevard. e) A minimum setback of 65 feet shall be provided along 13th Avenue SW. f) A minimum 25-foot-wide landscape buffer shall be provided abutting Collier Boulevard and 13th Avenue SW. These buffers shall contain two staggered rows of trees that shall be spaced no more than 30 feet on center, and a double row hedge at least 24 inches in height at time of planting and attaining a minimum of three feet height within one year. A minimum of 50% of the 25-foot-wide buffer area shall be comprised of a meandering bed of shrubs and ground covers other than grass. g) A ten -foot "Type A" buffer shall be provided long the proiect's western boundary. The buffer shall be consistent with "Type A" LDC requirements except that required trees shall be spaced no more than 25' on center. h) Consistent with public safety requirements and best practices for rural areas, outdoor lighting shall be placed, constructed, and maintained in such manner as to prevent or reduce light pollution. Light poles (light fixtures) shall be limited to a mounting height of 15 ft and dark sky compliant (flat panel, full cut-off fixtures -backlight, up light and glare (BUG) rating where U=0) to avoid light trespass onto adjacent property. Site lighting fixtures will be a 3000K maximum color temperature. Page 3 of 4 13th Ave SW Commercial Infill Subdistrict PL20220000289 February 8, 2023 ENGINEERING C. LIST OF MAPS Urban Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map Urban Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict Pine Ridge Road (CR 896) — Interchange Activity Center and Pine Ridge Road Mixed Use 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 Ave SW Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map Page 4 of 4 13th Ave SW Commercial Infill Subdistrict PL20220000289 February 8, 2023 4050 13T" Ave SW Commercial Planned Development (CPD) 10.02.08 Requirements for Amendments to the Official Zoning Atlas 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan. The proposed change is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan pursuant to the proposed 13th Ave SW Commercial lnfill Subdistrict. Please see GMPA narrative outlining consistency with these elements. 2. The existing land use pattern. The subject property is mostly vacant with an abandoned single-family home located on the northern parcel. It has a current zoning designation of Estates (E), however, the property is located on the fringe of a commercial node and bounded by an FPL Service Center and FPL Substation to the south and FPL Substation to the west. The subject property is adjacent to Collier Blvd public right-of-way to the east and 13th Ave SW public right-of-way to the north. Please refer to the project narrative for further information addressing compatibility with existing land uses. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. The location of this CPUD and self -storage use is ideal. The subject property is located off a major arterial and fully buffered from all surrounding residential uses. The property is located on the fringe of a commercial node and bounded by an FPL Service Center and FPL Substation to the south and FPL Substation to the west. The proposed subdistrict is consistent with nearby commercial uses and a logical district in light of the two electrical substations surrounding the property. Please refer to the project narrative for further information addressing compatibility. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. The proposed CPUD and companion 131" Ave SW Commercial lnfill Subdistrict, correct residential district boundaries that are no longer logical or appropriate given that two electrical substations have separated and isolated the subject property from the surrounding Estates FLU designation and zoning district. S. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary. Changing conditions make approval of the proposed rezoning necessary. Due to the two power substations surrounding the property, the existing property is no longer appropriate for residential uses. There is an influx of residents moving to the county and a lack of available storage as indicated within the market study provided as part of the GMPA submittal. The proposed use is a very low impact commercial use and represent a logical and feasible use for the subject property. (Supp. No. 26) Created: 2022-08-25 18:42:57 [EST] Page 1 of 3 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. The passive nature of the proposed use, the ample separation from surrounding residential uses, setbacks, buffers, site design, landscaping and proposed architecture ensure compatibility with surrounding uses and result in a quality project that will be an asset to the neighborhood. The proposed use complements existing commercial and residential uses in the area and will provide a service/facility that will meet the needs of neighboring communities and businesses as supported by the market study. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. No, the proposed project will not create or excessively increase traffic congestion. The proposed self - storage use generates very few trips, and per the TIS provided as part of this application, it was determined that the proposed project will not have a significant or negative impact upon the surrounding road network. It was verified that all roadways, within the project's area of influence, currently have a surplus of capacity and can accommodate the traffic associated with the proposed self -storage use. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. The proposed change does not create a drainage problem. A stormwater system meeting or exceeding all SFWMD and County requirements will be provided. A copy of the approved SFWMD ERP will be provided as part of the SDP process. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. The proposed project will not adversely affect light and air to adjacent areas. The development within will be substantially setback and buffered from adjacent areas. 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent area. The proposed use will not adversely affect property values. The subject property is isolated from adjacent residential land use by two electrical substations. The proposed use complements existing commercial and residential uses in the general area and will provide a service/facility that will meet the needs of neighboring communities and businesses as supported by the market study. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. The proposed project is surrounded by two FPL substations and isolated from residential and commercial uses beyond. The project will not be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent properties. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. The proposed development does not grant a special privilege to the subject property owner. The proposed CPUD and companion subdistrict are requested in response to development actions by others. The project will provide a benefit to the community by providing needed storage as indicated within the market study. (Supp. No. 26) Created: 2022-08-25 18:42:57 [EST] Page 2 of 3 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. The property is surrounded by two FPL substations. The site is not suitable for residential development. Please refer to the CPUD and GMPA narratives for further information. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county. The proposed use was specifically selected to provide a low impact use commercial use that would not be adversely affected by the abutting power substations. The proposed use and scale of the project is appropriate for the property and responsive to market needs for self -storage space. 15. Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. While not impossible, this site is ideal for the proposed use. Given the abutting FPL power substations, the limited commercial developable land in the county, the demonstrated need for additional storage, and current conditions of the subject site, the proposed project is located in an ideal location. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. The existing zoning district limits potential development to residential only. As mentioned above and within the PUD Narrative, the residential use is no longer appropriate for the subject property due to the abutting FPL substations. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code ch. 106, art. II], as amended. Water and sewer service is available. There are existing water and sewer lines in close proximity. Those lines will be extended to the subject property at the applicant's expense. Roadway capacity is adequate as confirmed by the TIS provided. Drainage is adequate for the site. Waste management, cable, electric, and telephone service are available. Payment of impact fees and timing of adequate public facilities certification are mechanisms to assure the development is appropriately serviced. (Supp. No. 26) Created: 2022-08-25 18:42:57 [EST] Page 3 of 3 CoAr County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Application for a Public Hearing for PUD Rezone, Amendment to PUD or PUD to PUD Rezone PETITION NO PROJECT NAME To be completed by staff DATE PROCESSED ❑■ PUD Rezone (PUDZ): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A.-F., Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code ❑ Amendment to PUD (PUDA): LDC subsection 10.02.13 E. and Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone (PUDR): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A.-F. APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Property Owner(s): 4050 13 AVE LLC Name of Applicant if different than owner: GREG OHERREN - SHAMROCK BUILDERS Address: 9800 WESTPOINT DR, SUITE 200 City: Indianapolis - Telephone: E-Mail Address: Cell: State: IN ZIP:46256 Fax: Name of Agent: PATRICK VANASSE, AICP (SEE LIST OF ADDITIONAL AGENTS) Firm: RWA, Inc. Address: 6610 Willow Park Telephone: 239-597-0575 City: Naples State: FL ZIP: 34109 Cell: Fax: E-Mail Address: PVANASSE@CONSULT-RWA.COM Be aware that Collier County has lobbyist regulations. Guide yourself accordingly and ensure that you are in compliance with these regulations. March 4, 2020 Page 1 of 11 COAT County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 t,EZONE REQUEST This application is requesting a rezone from: ESTATES (E) Zoning district(s) to the COMMERCIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (CPUD) zoning district(s). Present Use of the Property: VACANT/SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Proposed Use (or range of uses) of the property: CPUD/Limited to Self -Storage Facility Original PUD Name: N/A Ordinance No.: N/A PROPERTY INFORMATION On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the application: • If the request involves changes to more than one zoning district, the applicant shall include a separate legal description for property involved in each district; • The applicant shall submit 4 copies of a recent survey (completed within the last six months, maximum 1" to 400' scale), if required to do so at the pre -application meeting; and • The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions arise concerning the legal description, an engineer's certification or sealed survey may be required. Section/Township/Range: 15 49 26 Lot: N/A Block: N/A Subdivision: N/A Metes & Bounds Description: See attached. Plat Book: N/A Page #: N/A Property I.D. Number: 37931080007; 37931120006 Size of Property: 655 _ ft. x 360 ft = 235,800 Total Sq. Ft. Acres: 5.54 Address/ General Location of Subject Property: 4050 13TH AVE SW SOUTHWEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF 13TH AVE SW AND COLLIER BLVD. PUD District (refer to LDC subsection 2.03.06 C): ❑■ Commercial ❑ Residential ❑ Community Facilities ❑ Mixed Use ❑ Other: ❑ Industrial March 4, 2020 Page 2 of 11 CoAr County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE Zoning Land Use N ESTATES (E) 13 AVE SW ROW; RESIDENTIAL S PUD ELECTRICAL SUB STATION & FPL SERVICE CENTER E ESTATES (E) COLLIER BLVD ROW; RESIDENTIAL W ESTATES (E) FPL ELECTRICAL SUB STATION If the owner of the subject property owns contiguous property please provide a detailed legal description of the entire contiguous property on a separate sheet attached to the application. Section/Township/Range: N/� N/� N/A Lot: NSA Block: NSA Subdivision: N/A Plat Book: N/A Page #: N/A Property I.D. Number: N/A Metes & Bounds Description: N/A ASSOCIATIONS Required: List all registered Home Owner Association(s) that could be affected by this petition. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Board of County Commissioner's website at http://www.colliergov.net/Index.aspx?page=774. Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner Association: City: State: ZIP: Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP: March 4, 2020 Page 3 of 11 CACT Count y COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www. co I l i e rco u n ty. gov EVALUATION CRITERIA 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Pursuant to LDC subsections 10.02.13 B, 10.02.08 F and Chapter 3 G. of the Administrative Code, staff's analysis and recommendation to the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission's recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners shall be based upon consideration of the applicable criteria. On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a narrative statement describing the rezone request with specific reference to the criteria below. Include any backup materials and documentation in support of the request. a. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. b. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the county attorney. C. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. (This is to include identifying what Sub -district, policy or other provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that Sub -district, policy or other provision.) d. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. e. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. f. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. g. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. h. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. Deed Restrictions: The County is legally precluded from enforcing deed restrictions; however, many communities have adopted such restrictions. You may wish to contact the civic or property owners association in the area for which this use is being requested in order to ascertain whether or not the request is affected by existing deed restrictions. March 4, 2020 Page 4 of 11 COAT County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Previous land use petitions on the subject property: To your knowledge, has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? If so, what was the nature of that hearing? No Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? ❑ Yes ❑■ No if so please provide copies. PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS This land use petition requires a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM), pursuant to Chapter 3 E. of the Administrative Code and LDC section 10.03.06. Following the NIM, the applicant will submit a written summary and any commitments that have been made at the meeting. Refer to Chapter 8 B. of the Administrative Code for the NIM procedural requirements. Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code requires that the applicant must remove their public hearing advertising sign(s) after final action is taken by the Board of County Commissioners. Based on the Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing advertising sign(s) immediately. RECORDING OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS Within 30 days of adoption of the Ordinance, the owner or developer (specify name) at their expense shall record in the Public Records of Collier County a Memorandum of Understanding of Developer Commitments or Notice of Developer Commitments that contains the legal description of the property that is the subject of the land use petition and contains each and every commitment of the owner or developer specified in the Ordinance. The Memorandum or Notice shall be in form acceptable to the County and shall comply with the recording requirements of Chapter 695, FS. A recorded copy of the Memorandum or Notice shall be provided to the Collier County Planned Unit Development Monitoring staff within 15 days of recording of said Memorandum or Notice. LDC subsection 10.02.08 D This application will be considered "open" when the determination of "sufficiency" has been made and the application is assigned a petition processing number. The application will be considered "closed" when the petitioner withdraws the application through written notice or ceases to supply necessary information to continue processing or otherwise actively pursue the rezoning, amendment or change, for a period of 6 months. An application deemed "closed" will not receive further processing and an application "closed" through inactivity shall be deemed withdrawn. An application deemed "closed" may be re -opened by submission of a new application, repayment of all application fees and the grant of a determination of "sufficiency". Further review of the request will be subject to the then current code. March 4, 2020 Page 5 of 11 Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.col liercou nty.gov Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: ❑ PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code ❑ Amendment to PUD- Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with an up-to-date application. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. A Model PUD Document is available online at http://www.colliercountyfl.gov/Home/ShowDocument?id=76983. REQUIREMENTS COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Cover Letter with Narrative Statement including a detailed description of why amendment is necessary 1 ❑ Completed Application with required attachments (download latest version) 1 Pre -application meeting notes 1 y ❑ Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 1 Property Ownership Disclosure Form 1 Notarized and completed Covenant of Unified Control 1 Completed Addressing Checklist 1 Warranty Deed(s) 1 ❑ List Identifying Owner and all parties of corporation 1 ❑ Signed and sealed Boundary Survey 1 ❑ Architectural Rendering of proposed structures 1 ❑ Current Aerial Photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. 1 ❑ Statement of Utility Provisions 1 ® ❑ Environmental Data Requirements pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 1 ❑ Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) packet at time of public hearings. Coordinate with project planner at time of public hearings. ❑ ❑ Listed or Protected Species survey, less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys. 1 ❑ Traffic Impact Study Fee cut,&,ec7--e,) 4r T,„, -,F 'kiiN S , t� 1 ❑ Historical Survey 1 ❑ ❑ School Impact Analysis Application, if applicable 1 ❑ ❑ Electronic copy of all required documents 1 ❑ Completed Exhibits A-F (see below for additional information)' ❑� ® ❑ List of requested deviations from the LDC with justification for each (this document is separate from Exhibit E) ❑ Checklist continues on next page March 4, 2020 Page 9 of 11 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.col liercou nty.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Revised Conceptual Master Site Plan 24" x 36"and One 8 %" x 11" copy ❑ ❑ Original PUD document/ordinance, and Master Plan 24" x 36" — Only if Amending the PUD ❑ ❑ }� I� Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru & underlined 1 ❑INS Copy of Official Interpretation and/or Zoning Verification 1 ❑ *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement 'The following exhibits are to be completed on a separate document and attached to the application packet: Exhibit A: List of Permitted Uses Exhibit B: Development Standards Exhibit C: Master Plan- See Chapter 3 E. 1. of the Administrative Code EA Exhibit D: Legal Description Exhibit E: List of Requested LDC Deviations and justification for each l� Exhibit F: List of Development Commitments If located in RFMU (Rural Fringe Mixed Use) Receiving Land Areas Pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08.A.2.a.2.(b.)i.c., the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239- 690-3500 for information regarding "Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan." PLANNERS — INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: ❑School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart ❑ Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Johnson Utilities Engineering: Eric Fey ❑ Parks and Recreation: Barry Williams (Director) Emergency Management: Dan Summers ❑ Immokalee Water/Sewer District: ❑ City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director ❑ Other: ❑ City of Naples Utilities ❑ Other: ASSOCIATED FEES FOR APPLICATION eD, Y, Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 PUD Rezone: $10,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone: $8,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre I I PUD Amendment: $6,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre 1-1 Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $2,250.00 '1� Environmental Data Requirements -EIS Packet (submittal determined at pre -application meeting): $2,500.00 ❑ Listed or Protected Species Review (when an EIS is not required): $1,000.00 Transportation Review Fees: — o Methodology Review: $500.00 *Additional fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting. o Minor Study Review: $750.00 o Major Study Review $1,500.00 March 4, 2020 Page 10 of 11 C01(111eT County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov Legal A Wertising Fees: o/CCPC: $1,125.00 o/BCC: $500.00 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 School Concurrency Fee, if applicable: o Mitigation Fees, if application, to be determined by the School District in coordination with the County Fire Code Plans Review Fees are not listed, but are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. *Additional fee for the 5" and subsequent re -submittal will be accessed at 20% of the original fee. fZ / zvz Z ignature of Petitioner or Agent Date Printed named of signing party March 4.2020 Page 11 of 11 ENGINEERING 4050 131h Ave Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) ADDITIONAL AGENTS Noel J. Davies — Founding Partner Davies Duke, PPLC 1415 Panther Lane, Suite 442 Naples, FL 34109 James M Banks — P.E., President JMB TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, INC. 4711 7ch Ave SW Naples, FL 34119 Certificate of Authorization No. 27830 Parke Lewis — Biologist DEXBENDER ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING 4470 Camino Real Way, Suite 101 Fort Myers, FL 33966 Russ Weyer — President Real Estate Econometrics, Inc. 707 Orchid Drive Suite 707 Naples, FL 34102 6610 Willow Park Drive Suite 200 Naples, FL 34109 1 (239) 597-0575 1 Fax (239) 597-0578 www.consult-rwa.com ENGINEERING EXHIBIT D 4050 13th Ave Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) LEGAL DESCRIPTION* TRACT 119, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT NO. 26, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, PAGE 15, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPT THE EAST 35 FEET AS DESCRIBED IN , PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPT THE EAST 35 FEET AS DESCRIBED IN ORDER OF TAKING RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 4963, PAGE 2748, AND LESS AND EXCEPT THE WEST 260 FEET. 4963, PAGE 2748, AND LESS AND EXCEPT THE WEST 260 FEET. , AND LESS AND EXCEPT THE WEST 260 FEET. TRACT 120, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT NO. 26, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, PAGE 15, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPT THE EAST 35 FEET AS DESCRIBED IN , PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPT THE EAST 35 FEET AS DESCRIBED IN ORDER OF TAKING RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 4963, PAGE 2748, AND LESS AND EXCEPT THE WEST 260 FEET. 4963, PAGE 2748, AND LESS AND EXCEPT THE WEST 260 FEET. , AND LESS AND EXCEPT THE WEST 260 FEET. CONTAINING 5.53 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. *Taken from Alta Survey Conducted By GradyMinor certified on 11/17/2021 - Plat Book 7, Pg 15 Page 1 of 1 4050 13th Ave SW CPUD PUDZ-PL 20210003321 August 25, 2022 CoMer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliercountvfl.gov (239) 252-2400 Assigned Planner: Pre -Application Meeting Notes Petition Type: Estates Mini Warehouse �Pu DZ Date and Time: Thursday 1/13/22 at 1 : 30 PM Eric Ortman Engineering Manager (for PPL's and FP's): Project Information Project Name: Estates Mini Warehouse PL#: 20210003321 Property ID #: 37931080007 Current Zoning: Estates (E) Project Address: 4050 13th Ave City: Naples State: FL Zip:. Applicant: Greg Oherren - Shamrock Builders 34116 Agent Name:_ RWA Engineering Phone: 239-260-4294 6610 Willow Park Dr.Ste 200 Naples FL 34109 Agent/Firm Address: City: State: Zip: PropertyOwner: 4050 13th Ave LLC under Contract with Shamrock Builders Please provide the following, if applicable: i. Total Acreage: 5.54 ii. Proposed # of Residential Units: iii. Proposed Commercial Square Footage: iv. For Amendments, indicate the original petition number: JA vi. If there is an Ordinance or Resolution associated with this project, please indicate the type and number: If the project is within a Plat, provide the name and AR#/PL#: Updated 1/12/2021 Page 1 1 of 5 Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliercountvfl.gov (239) 252-2400 Meeting Notes As of 10/16/2017 all Zoning applications have revised applications, and your associated Application is included in your notes; additionally a *new Property Ownership Disclosure Form is required for all applications. A copy of this new form is included in your pre-app Note - link is https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/Home/ShowDocument?id=75093 0 Al IN G- — £ A-t L. 0 rl i m /F w r A—J t7 c , i ,e4 /i,; i ,e — / i ly Z rl /✓% A,VS N /L l) U^J — M l JL -C. CJ YT �-✓�f `Q.w �.32,..rr K b N o1 Y AiT�Q E�,LIv aA� M,�� races - «,�;� - �n� e P� v a b: I ,�. b •� , 2-0iv4.1G dPle� P-111-r- k�e yi2�n - 12-- rv.rr, 5 Fo,.e_ -9ham,Zycy- S YuF ST-v/1 t/ 6,e- �106-0 ! -n, 71-1rz Sw(6 uAft ty Aa--yax r �11.�% �✓1 JI %�"N�O /�I'�'� M1�c'-. ZJ eV V ff` Q�c 2�,ti 1�)1 �,vrn �� C��,r� cis 31))- a S a- /U 3,& If Site is within the City of Naples Water Service Area please send to Naples Utilities and Planning Departments. Then, if the petition is submitted, we are to send it (by email) to the four persons below in their Utilities and Planning Depts. - along with a request that they send us a letter or email of "no objection" to the petition. Bob Middleton RMiddletontcDnaplesgov.com Allyson Holland AM Holland CcDnaplesgov.corn Robin Singer RSinger@naplesgov.com Erica Martin emartin(-@naplesgov.com Disclaimer: Information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required data. Updated 1/12/2021 Page 1 2 of 5 Pre-App Notes RZ-PL20210003321— Estates Mini -Warehouse Patrick Vanesse — Seeking small scale GMPA with map amendment and extension of existing commercial node; perhaps a new sub -district. Low -volume traffic generator. Parcel is surrounded on two sides by an electrical sub -station thereby limiting the intrinsic value of abutting parcels for residential development. Although GGAMP limits commercial development in the Estates there is a commercial parcel abutting the sub -station. Project will have full-time security and full buffering. We will conduct a market study. Greg O'Herran — we are builders/owners of self -storage facilities. This will be mostly one-story buildings but there may be some that are two stories, some climate control. No outward facing doors. There may be a drive-thru where trucks can park and unload while not being visible from road. Access will be from 13th Ave. Architect Peter Shawinsky was not able to attend the meeting but noted in an e-mail that the applicant should refer to LDC §5.05.08.E.2 specifically (Design standards for specific building uses, self -storage building) and LDC 5.05.08 generally. Market study will need to include entire potential supply which includes undeveloped properties where zoning permits self -storage; and demand for the study area. Discussion on compatibility with adjacent/abutting residential and commercial uses. There is a left turn onto 13th heading north on Collier; from 13th it is right turn only. After the meeting, Greg O'Herren stated that the project would be a PUD not a straight rezone. A NIM will have to be held; there is likely to be local opposition to the project. It was suggested to applicant that they talk with their neighbors. LDC / Admin Code sections for reference and included: 2.03.06 (PUD districts); 10.02.08 (requirements for amendments to official zoning atlas; Administrative Code Chap. 3G.1 (PUDs); Chap. 4G (official interpretation of LDC). Collier County Growth Management Department Principal Planner, Zoning Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Direct line: (239) 252-1032 Eric.Ortman@colliercountyfl.gov ThomasClarkeVEN From: SawyerMichael Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2022 2:21 PM To: ThomasClarkeVEN; OrtmanEric; HansenRachel Subject: Self -Storage Pre app GMPA and Rezone Notes Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Thomas, For both GMPA and Rezone-PUD companion requests: Please check the TIS required box on the pre app checklist as well as methodology. Please also add the following notes: Transportation Planning: Methodology meeting by email is required and provide note on TIS cover sheet that fee will be collected at time of Rezone-PUD and GMPA submittal. Address all transportation elements of the GMP. Provide both ITE and SIC use codes in the TIS. Provide a transportation condition with the Rezone for trip limit based on TIS using standard language: "The maximum total daily trip generation for the Rezone-PUD shall not exceed two-way PM peak hour net trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval." Respectfully, Michael Sawyer Principal Planner Growth Management Department Transportation Planning 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Suite 103 Naples, Florida 34104 239-252-2926 michael.sawyer(i�colliercount�fl.gov Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. ThomasClarkeVEN From: TempletonMark Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2022 2:11 PM To: ThomasClarkeVEN Subject: RE: Pre-App RESEARCH for Estates Mini Warehouse (RZ) - PL20210003321 - virtual meeting tomorrow, Thursday 1/13/21 at 1:30 PM Hi Thomas, Below are the landscape notes for this one: Landscape: Label buffers on the CU Master Plan consistent with any buffer requirements in the sub -district that will be added to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. Other subdistricts in the Golden Gate Area Master Plan require 25' wide buffers along roads with enhanced planting requirements. Respectfully, Mark Templeton, RLA Principal Planner/Landscape Review C;0*1�_r County Development Review Division Exceeding Expectations, Every Day! NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples Florida 34104 Phone: 239.252.2475 How are we doing? Please CLICK HERE to fill out a Customer Survey. We appreciate your Feedback! Disclaimer- this email is not to be interpreted as an endorsement or approval of any permit, plan, project, or deviation from the Land Development Code. From: ThomasClarkeVEN <Thomas.Clarke@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2022 2:00 PM To: Ashton Heidi <Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov>; BeardLaurie <Laurie.Beard @colliercountyfl.gov>; BrownCraig <Craig.Brown@colliercountyfl.gov>; CookJaime <Jaime.Cook@colliercountyfl.gov>; CrotteauKathynell <Kathynell.Crotteau@colliercountyfl.gov>; PerryDerek <Derek.Perry@colliercountyfl.gov>; FaulknerSue <Sue.Faulkner@colliercountyfl.gov>; FeyEric <Eric.Fey@colliercountyfl.gov>; CastroGabriela <Gabriela.Castro@colliercountyfl.gov>; ImpactFees <ImpactFees@colliercountyfl.gov>; MoscaMichele <Michele.Mosca@colliercountyfl.gov>; OrthRichard <Richard.Orth@colliercountyfl.gov>; KlopfParker <Parker.Klopf@colliercountyfl.gov>; HansenRachel <Rachel.Hansen @colliercountyfl.gov>; AshkarSally <Sally.Ashkar@colliercountyfl.gov>; SawyerMichael <Michael.Sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov>; TempletonMark <Mark.Templeton@colliercountyfl.gov>; WilkieKirsten <Kirsten.Wilkie@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: OrtmanEric <Eric.Ortman@colliercountyfl.gov> ThomasClarkeVEN From: BrownCraig Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2022 2:23 PM To: ThomasClarkeVEN Subject: RE: Pre-App RESEARCH for Estates Mini Warehouse (RZ) - PL20210003321 - virtual meeting tomorrow, Thursday 1/13/21 at 1:30 PM Attachments: Straight Rezone checklist 2016.doc; Environmental data Checklist updated December 2016.doc Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Thomas Here are my notes: GMPA address the following sections of the Growth Management Plan (Conservation Coastal Management (CCME) Objective 7.1, Policy 6.1. (Listed species protection, Native vegetation preservation). Straight Rezone: Without a MCP Rezone without a Master Concept Plan, I only need a FLUCFCS Map of the property the rest can be provided at Development order time. Check the box for FLUCFCS Map only. (No fee) With a MCP If a Master Concept Plan is provided the preservation requirement will be 15% of the native vegetation. Provide Environmental Data and address the following: ( Listed species, Conservation Coastal Management (CCME) Objective 7.1, Policy 6.1.) Provide preserve calculations on the Master Concept plan. If there are deviations requested please provide narratives to explain the justifications for the deviations. Environmental Data Fee $2,500. Craig Brown Senior Environmental Specialist Development Review Division (239) 252-2548. How are we doing? Please CLICK HERE to fill out a Customer Survey. We appreciate your Feedback! From: ThomasClarkeVEN <Thomas.Clarke@ colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2022 2:00 PM To: AshtonHeidi <Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov>; Beardl-aurie <Laurie.Beard@colliercountyfl.gov>; BrownCraig <Craig.Brown @colliercountyfl.gov>; CookJaime <Jaime.Cook@colliercountyfl.gov>; CrotteauKathynell P4-(', pS. i�. ( Environmental Data Checklist Project Name PG 2 v 7,1 Doc> 33.2I The Environmental Data requirements can be found in LDC Section 3.08.00 1. Provide the EIS fee if PUD or CU. WHO AND WHAT COMPANY PREPARED THE ENVIRONMENTAL DATA REPORT? Preparation of Environmental Data. Environmental Data Submittal Requirements shall be prepared by an individual with academic credentials and experience in the area of environmental sciences or natural resource management. Academic credentials and experience shall be a bachelor's or higher degree in one of the biological sciences with at least two years of ecological or biological professional experience in the State of Florida. Please include revision dates on resubmittals. Identify on a current aerial, the location and acreage of all SFWMD jurisdictional wetlands according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS) and include this information on the SDP or final plat construction plans. Wetlands must be verified by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) or Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) prior to SDP or final plat construction plans approval. For sites in the RFMU district, provide an assessment in accordance with 3.05.07 F and identify on the FLUCFCS map the location of all high quality wetlands (wetlands having functionality scores of at least 0.65 WRAP or 0.7 UMAM) and their location within the proposed development plan. Sites with high quality wetlands must have their functionality scores verified by the SFWMD or DEP prior to first development order approval. Where functionality scores have not been verified by either the SFWMD or DEP, scores must be reviewed and accepted by County staff, consistent with State regulation. 4. SDP or final plat construction plans with impacts to five (5) or more acres of wetlands shall provide an analysis of potential water quality impacts of the project by evaluating water quality loadings expected from the project (post development conditions considering the proposed land uses and stormwater management controls) compared with water quality loadings of the project area as it exists in its pre -development conditions. The analysis shall be performed using methodologies approved by Federal and State water quality agencies, and must demonstrate no increase in nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorous) loadings in the post development scenario. 5. Where treated stormwater is allowed to be directed into preserves, show how the criteria in 3.05.07 H have been met. 6. Where native vegetation is retained on site, provide a topographic map to a half foot and, where possible, provide elevations within each of the FLUCFCS Codes identified on site. For SDP or final plat construction plans, include this information on the site plans. Provide a wildlife survey for the nests of bald eagle and for listed species known to inhabit biological communities similar to those existing on site. The survey shall be conducted in accordance with the guidelines or recommendations of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Survey times may be reduced or waived where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low, as determined by the FFWCC and USFWS. Where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low, the survey time may be reduced or waived by the County Manager or designee, when the project is not reviewed or technical assistance not provided by the FFWCC and USFWS. Additional survey time may be required if listed species are discovered 8. Provide a survey for listed plants identified in 3.04.03 9. Wildlife habitat management and monitoring plans in accordance with 3.04.00 shall be required where listed species are utilizing the site or where wildlife habitat management and monitoring plans are required by the FFWCC or USFWS. These plans shall describe how the project directs incompatible land uses away from listed species and their habitats. Identify the location of listed species nests, burrows, dens, foraging areas, and the PA--G.e_ A D. a . location of any bald eagle nests or nest protection zones on the native vegetation aerial with FLUCFCS overlay for the site. Wildlife habitat management plans shall be included on the SDP or final plat construction plans. Bald eagle management plans are required for sites containing bald eagle nests or nest protection zones, copies of which shall be included on the SDP or final plat construction plans. 10. For sites or portions of sites cleared of native vegetation or in agricultural operation, provide documentation that the parcel(s) were issued a permit to be cleared and are in compliance with the 25 year rezone limitation pursuant to section 10.02.06. For sites permitted to be cleared prior to July 2003, provide documentation that the parcel(s) are in compliance with the 10 year rezone limitation previously identified in the GMP. Criteria defining native vegetation and determining the legality, process and criteria for clearing are found in 3.05.05, 3.05.07 and 10.02.06. 11. Identify on a current aerial the acreage, location and community types of all upland and wetland habitats on the project site, according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS), and provide a legend for each of the FLUCFCS Codes identified. Aerials and overlay information must be legible at the scale provided. Provide calculations for the acreage of native vegetation required to be retained on -site. Include the above referenced calculations and aerials on the SDP or final plat construction plans. In a separate report, demonstrate how the preserve selection criteria pursuant to 3.05.07 have been met. Where applicable, include in this report an aerial showing the project boundaries along with any undeveloped land, preserves, natural flowways or other natural land features, located on abutting properties. 12. Include on a separate site plan, the project boundary and the land use designations and overlays for the RLSA, RFMU, ST and ACSC-ST districts. Include this information on the SDP or final plat construction plans. 13. Where off -site preservation of native vegetation is proposed in lieu of on -site, demonstrate that the criteria in section 3.05.07 have been met and provide a note on the SDP or final plat construction plans indicating the type of donation (monetary payment or land donation) identified to satisfy the requirement. Include on the SDP or final plat construction plans, a location map(s) and property identification number(s) of the off -site parcel(s) if off -site donation of land is to occur. 14. Provide the results of any Environmental Assessments and/or Audits of the property, along with a narrative of the measures needed to remediate if required by FDEP. 15. Soil and/or ground water sampling shall be required at the time of first development order submittal for sites that occupy farm fields (crop fields, cattle dipping ponds, chemical mixing areas), golf courses, landfill or junkyards or for sites where hazardous products exceeding 250 gallons of liquid or 1,000 pounds of solids were stored or processed or where hazardous wastes in excess of 220 pounds per month or 110 gallons at any point in time were generated or stored. The amount of sampling and testing shall be determined by a registered professional with experience in the field of Environmental Site Assessment and shall at a minimum test for organochlorine pesticides (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 8081) and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) 8 metals using Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) soil sampling Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) FS 3000, in areas suspected of being used for mixing and at discharge point of water management system. Sampling should occur randomly if no points of contamination are obvious. Include a background soil analysis from an undeveloped location hydraulically upgradient of the potentially contaminated site. Soil sampling should occur just below the root zone, about 6 to 12 inches below ground surface or as otherwise agreed upon with the registered professional with experience in the field of Environmental Site Assessment. Include in or with the Environmental Site Assessment, the acceptable State and Federal pollutant levels for the types of contamination found on site and indicate in the Assessment, when the contaminants are over these levels. If this analysis has been done as part of an Environmental Audit then the report shall be submitted. The County shall coordinate with the FDEP where contamination exceeding applicable FDEP standards is identified on site or where an Environmental Audit or Environmental Assessment has been submitted. 16. Shoreline development must provide an analysis demonstrating that the project will remain fully functional for its intended use after a six-inch rise in sea level. 17. Provide justification for deviations from environmental LDC provisions pursuant to GMP CCME Policy 6.1.1 (13), if requested. 18. Where applicable, provide evidence of the issuance of all applicable federal and/or state oil and gas permits for proposed oil and gas activities in Collier County. Include all state permits that comply with the requirements of Chapter 62C-25 through 62C-30, F.A.C., as those rules existed on January 13, 2005. 19. Identify any Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones (WRM-ST) within the project area and provide an analysis for how the project design avoids the most intensive land uses within the most sensitive WRM-STs and will comply with the WRM-ST pursuant to 3.06.00. Include the location of the Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones on the SDP or final plat construction plans. For land use applications such as standard and PUD rezones and CUs, provide a separate site plan or zoning map with the project boundary and Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones identified. 20. Demonstrate that the design of the proposed stormwater management system and analysis of water quality and quantity impacts fully incorporate the requirements of the Watershed Management regulations of 3.07.00. 21. For sites located in the Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern -Special Treatment overlay district (ACSC- ST), show how the project is consistent with the development standards and regulations in 4.02.14. 22. For multi -slip docking facilities with ten slips or more, and for all marina facilities, show how the project is consistent with 5.05.02. Refer to the Manatee Protection Plan for site specific requirements of the Manatee Protection Plan not included in 5.05.02. 23. For development orders within RFMU sending lands, show how the project is consistent with each of the applicable Objectives and Policies of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the GMP. 24. The County Manager or designee may require additional data or information necessary to evaluate the project's compliance with LDC and GMP requirements. (LDC 10.02.02.A.3 f) The following to be determined at preapplication meeting: (Choose those that apply) a. Provide overall description of project with respect to environmental and water management issues. b. Explain how project is consistent with each of the applicable objectives and policies in the CCME of the GMP. c. Explain how the project meets or exceeds the native vegetation preservation requirement in the CCME and LDC. d. Indicate wetlands to be impacted and the effects of the impact to their functions and how the project's design compensates for wetland impacts. e. Indicate how the project design minimizes impacts to listed species. Describe the measures that are proposed as mitigation for impacts to listed species. 25. PUD zoning and CU petitions. For PUD rezones and CU petitions, applicants shall collate and package applicable Environmental Data Submittal Requirements into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) document, prior to public hearings and after all applicable staff reviews are complete. Copies of the EIS shall be provided to the County Manager or designee prior to public hearings. 26. Is EAC Review (by CCPC) required? �A—( .2. 0 , L/ . 27. PUD master plan or PPL/SDP site plan notes: Where preserves occur adjacent to development off site and will be used in lieu of landscape buffers, include the following condition in the environmental commitments section of the PUD document. Preserves may be used to satisfy the landscape buffer requirements after exotic vegetation removal in accordance with LDC sections 4.06.02 and 4.06.05.E.1. Supplemental plantings with native plant materials shall be in accordance with LDC section 3.05.07. 28. Additional comments 29. Stipulations for approval (Conditions) DA-Ga- 2. b.s , Environmental Straight Rezone (non-RFMU) Project Names The Preserve is not required to be designated at the time of Rezone for a Straight Rezone as long as a site plan is not included with the resolution. 1. Is the project is in compliance with the overlays, districts and/or zoning on the subject site and/or the surrounding properties? (CON, ST, PUD, RLSA, RFMU, etc.) (LDC 2.03.05-2.03.08; 4.08.00) 2. Submit a current aerial photograph (available from the Property Appraiser's office) and clearly delineate the subject site boundary lines. If the site is vegetated, provide FLUCFCS overlay and vegetation inventory identifying upland, wetland and exotic vegetation (Admin. Code Ch. 3 G.1. Application Contents #24). PROVIDE AT TIME OF REZONE The following 3-10 are to be provided only in the case that a detailed site plan is being provided with the Rezone _Ordinance. Otherwise, the following are to be provided at time of SDP/Plat. 3. Clearly identify the location of all preserves and label each as "Preserve" on all plans. (LDC 3.05.07.A.2). TO BE DONE AT TIME OF PLAT 4. Provide calculations on site plan showing the appropriate acreage of native vegetation to be retained, the max. amount and ratios permitted to be created on -site or mitigated off -site. Exclude vegetation located within utility and drainage easements from the preserve calculations (LDC 3.05.07.13-13; 3.05.07.F; 3.05.07.H. Ld-e). P547 TO BE DETERMINED AT TIME OF PLAT/SDP 5. Created and retained preserve areas shall meet the minimum width requirements per LDC 3.05.07.H.1.b. NEED TO MEET THIS REQUIREMENT AT TIME OF PLAT/SDP 6. Retained preservation areas shall be selected based on the criteria defined in LDC 3.05.07.A.3, include all 3 strata, be in the largest contiguous area possible and shall be interconnected within the site and to adjoining off -site preservation areas or wildlife corridors. (LDC 3.05.07.A.1-4) NEED TO MEET THIS REQ UIREMENT AT TIME OF PLAT/SDP 7. Principle structures shall be located a minimum of 25' from the boundary of the preserve boundary. No accessory structures and other site alterations, fill placement, grading, plant alteration or removal, or similar activity shall be permitted within 10' of the boundary unless it can be shown that it will not affect the integrity of the preserve (i.e. stem wall or berm around wetland preserve). Provide cross -sections for each preserve boundary identifying all site alterations within 25'. (LDC 3.05.07.H.3; 6.01.02.C.) NEED TO MEET THIS REQUIREMENT AT TIME OF PLAT/SDP 8. Wildlife survey required for sites where an EIS is not required, when so warranted. (LDC 10.02.02.A.2.f) Listed Species - P522 PROVIDE AT TIME OF PLAT/SDP 9. Provide Environmental Data identifying author credentials, consistency determination with the GMPs, off -site preserves, seasonal and historic high water levels, and analysis of water quality. For land previously used for farm fields or golf course, provide soil sampling/groundwater monitoring reports identifying any site contamination. (LDC 3.08.00) PROVIDE AT TIME OF PLAT/SDP 10. Site Plan shall state the minimum acreage required to be preserved only in the case that a detailed site plan is being provided with the Rezone Ordinance. (LDC 10.02.13.A.2) Fees: Listed Species Survey fee will be required at time of Plat/SDP. ThomasClarkeVEN From: Greg O'Herren <greg@shamrockbuilders.com> Sent: Friday, January 14, 2022 7:00 PM To: OrtmanEric; 'pvanasse@consult-rwa. com' Cc: ThomasClarkeVEN Subject: RE: Estates Mini -Storage EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. It will be pud. G reg From: OrtmanEric <Eric.Ortman@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Friday, January 14, 2022 11:16 AM To: pvanasse@consult-rwa. corn (pvanasse@consult-rwa.com) <pvanasse@consult-rwa.com> Cc: Greg O'Herren <greg@shamrockbuilders.com>; ThomasClarkeVEN <Thomas.Clarke@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Estates Mini -Storage Patrick, Would you please let me know if you are going to pursue a straight rezone or a PUD so that we can assign project to correct category? Thank you. Respectfully, Eric Co�CO%4"ty Collier County Growth Management Department Principal Planner, Zoning Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Direct line: (239) 252-1032 Eric.Ortman@colliercountyfl.gov Visit our Webiste at: WWW.COLLIER000NTYFL.GOV Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at http://bit.1y Co11ierZoning. Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Information contained in this email is subject to verification by the Zoning Manager and/or Planning Director; if this information is being used as a basis for the purchase/lease of a property or as a guide for the design of a project, it is recommended that a Zoning Verification Letter or Zoning Certificate Application is submitted to zoning services. Applications for a Zoning Verification Letter can be found here: https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/home/`showdocument?id=69624 Zoning Certificate applications can be found here: https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/vour-government/divisions-f- r/operations-regulatory-management/zoning-or-land-use-application/zoning-other-land-use-applications . P", �Z E. Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliercountyfl.eov (239) 252-2400 Meeting Notes F-G tG < 6, M/L �>i wi r Y� � A, — � v�.� Ana h�� P{ is .z 3,4 - 1 S'QNCY'eS i 319-.2 Co �-e-zs Apr 3%3ylLr s� F-¢-�S OFF 3%3��/1L _ ��z3.r4•`�-. Other required documentation for submittal (not listed on application): Disclaimer.- Information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required data. Updated 1/12/2021 Page 1 3 of 5 ThomasClarkeVEN From: OrtmanEric Sent: Friday, January 14, 2022 8:26 AM To: ThomasClarkeVEN Subject: FW: Pre -Application Meeting - PL20210003321 Estates Mini Warehouse (RZ) Pre -Application Meeting PL20220000289 - Shamrock Self Storage - 4050 13th AVE SW (GMPA) Attachments: PL20210003321 Estates Mini Warehouse RZ PL20220000289 Self Storage GMPA .pdf; CommercialRates03302.pdf, FUTURECommercialRates03302.pdf Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged From: SantabarbaraGino <Gino.Santabarbara@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2022 2:25 PM To: OrtmanEric <Eric.Ortman@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Pre -Application Meeting - PL20210003321 Estates Mini Warehouse (RZ) Pre -Application Meeting PL20220000289 - Shamrock Self Storage - 4050 13th AVE SW (GMPA) Good afternoon Eric, Please find attached the meeting notes for Impact Fees for Pre -Application Meeting - PL20210003321 Estates Mini Warehouse (RZ) & Pre -Application Meeting PL20220000289 - Shamrock Self Storage - 4050 13th AVE SW (GMPA) If you should have any questions or need any additional information please feel free to contact me, thank you. Gino Santabarbara, PMP Principal Planner Coer County Capital Project Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management Division 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Suite 103, Naples Florida 34104 Phone: 239.252.2925 Gino.Santabarbara@CollierCountyFL.aov Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. PL20210003321 Estates Mini Warehouse (RZ) PL20220000289 Co er County Shamrock Self Storage - 4050 13th AVE SW (GMPA) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 Meeting Notes Impact Fees — COA application and fee is reauired. All impact fees will be assessed and collected on the building permits at rate in effect at time of building permit application. Impact fees will be based mini -warehouse land uses. Credits from previous structures will be applied. Fire — Greater Naples impact fee = $0.22 per sq ft residential; $0.26 per sq ft commercial Fire impact fees are due at building permit issuance, remaining impact fees are due prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. See attached rate schedule for current rates. COLLIER COUNTY COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEES EFFECTIVE MARCH 30, 2021 Phase 3 Road Changes LAND USE EMS G BUERNMES T JAIL ENFOLA MENT ROAD TOTAL (ROUNDED) WATER, WASTEWATER AND FIRE NOT INCLUDED (See Page 3) Auto Sales (Luxury) $0.08084 $0.53622 $0.28407 $0.32161 $11.89275 $13.115 Per Square Foot Auto Sales (New/Used) $0.11538 $0.76528 $0.40542 $0.45899 $16.62200 $18.37 Per Square Foot Bank/Savings: Drive -hi ** $0.17896 $1.18697 $0.62882 $0.71191 $21.25400 $23.96 Per Square Foot Bank/Savings: Walk -In ** $0.17503 $1.16094 $0.61504 $0.69630 $12.30000 $14.95 Per Square Foot Business Park $0.07535 $0.49978 $0.26477 $0.29975 $10.85491 $11.99 Per Square Foot Car Wash - Automated $0.13814 $0.91626 $0.48540 $0.54954 $36.63520 $38.72 Per Square Foot Car Wash - Self -Service $68.29 $452.92 $239.94 $271.65 $11,354.07 $12,386.87 Per Bay Church $2.35 $15.62 $8.27 $9.37 $286.00 $321.61 Per Seat College - 7,500 students or less $7.85 $52.06 $27.58 $31.22 $1,896.60 $2,015.31 Per Student College - More than 7,500 student $5.49 $36.44 $19.31 $21.86 $1,424.59 $1,507.69 Per Student Convenience Store 24 hours) $0.42934 $2.84768 $1.50862 $1.70795 $77.93274 $84.43 Per Square Foot Convenience Store w/Gas: 4 or less Fuel Positions $341.43 $2,264.61 $1,199.72 $1,358.24 based $5,164.00 * Per Fuel Position 5-6 Fuel Positions $290.41 $1,926.22 $1,020.46 $1,155.29 based $4,392.38 * Per Fuel Position 7-8 Fuel Positions $258.23 $1,712.77 $907.37 $1,027.27 4ftrange based $3,905.64 * Per Fuel Position 9-10 Fuel Positions $230.76 $1,530.56 $810.85 $917.99 based $3,490.16 * Per Fuel PositionI 1-12 Fuel Positions $215.85 $1,431.65 $758.45 $858.66 based $3,264.61 * Per Fuel Position 13 or more Fuel Positions $203.29 $1,348.35 $714.32 $808.70 based on sq ft range $3,074.66 * Per Fuel Position < 2,000 sq. ft. based on # of fuel os based on # of fuel pos basedon#offuelpos based on # of fuel pos $6,910.00 $6,910.00 * Per Fuel Position 2,000 - 2,999 s . ft basedon#offuelpos based on # of fuel pos based on # of fuel pos based on # of fuel pos $8,252.00 $8,252.00 * Per Fuel Position 3,000+ sq ft based on # of fuel os based on # of fuel os based on # of fuel os based on # of fuel pos $9,262.00 $9,262.00 * Per Fuel Position Dance Studio/Gymnastics $0.17425 $1.15573 $0.61228 $0.69317 $8.94371 $11.58 Per Square Foot Day Care $3.92 $26.03 $13.79 $15.61 $1,072.81 $1,132.16 Per Student Furniture Store $0.01884 $0.12494 $0.06620 $0.07494 $3.34496 $3.63 Per Square Foot Golf Course $84.77 $562.25 $297.86 $337.22 $11,063.67 $12,345.77 Per Hole Golf Course - Bundled $25.42 $168.62 $89.33 $101.13 $3,318.94 $3,703.44 Per Hole Home Improvement Store $0.14207 $0.94229 $0.49919 $0.56515 $8.16354 $10.31 Per Square Foot Hospital $0.10753 $0.71322 $0.37784 $0.42777 $9.16800 $10.79 Per Square Foot Hotel $63.58 $421.69 $220.63 $252.91 $3,702.00 $4,660.81 Per Room Hotel - All Suites $63.58 $421.69 $220.63 $252.91 $2,948.96 $3,907.77 Per Room Industrial - General Light $0.05416 $0.35921 $0.19030 $0.21545 $4.58400 $5.40 Per Square Foot Manufacturing $0,03925 $0.26030 $0.13790 $0.15612 $3.45665 $4.05 Per Square Foot Marina $14.91 $98.91 $52.41 $59.33 $2,376.00 $2,601.56 PerDry/Wet Berth Mine/Commercial Excavation $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $12.13 $12.13 Per 1,000 Cubic Yards Mini -Warehouse $0.00471 $0.03124 $0.01655 $0.01873 $0.89100 $0.96 Per Square Foot Motel $59.65 $395.66 $209.60 $237.30 $2,074.00 $2,976.21 Per Room Movie Theater** $469.37 $3,113.19 $1,649.27 $1,867.20 $38,297.72 $45,396.75 Per Screen Impact Fee Administration 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Unit 103 Naples, FL 34104 239-252-6237 ?it-& , 3 /13' c" . 1 of 3 COLLIER COUNTY COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEES EFFECTIVE MARCH 30, 2021 Phase 3 Road Changes LAND USE EMS BUILDINGS GOVERNMENT JAIL LAW ENFORCEMENT ROAD TOTAL (ROUNDED) WATER, WASTEWATER AND FIRE NOT INCLUDED (See Page 3) Nursing Home $82.41 $546.63 $248.22 $327.85 $1,192.75 $2,397.86 Per Bed Office 6,000 s . ft. or less $0.07849 $0.52060 $0.27580 $0.31224 $8.60500 $9.79 Per Square Foot Office 6,001-100,000 s . ft. $0.09340 $0.61951 $0,32820 $0.37157 $8.60500 $10.02 Per Square Foot Office 100,001-200,000 s . ft. $0,07927 $0.52581 $0.27856 $0.31536 $8.60500 $9.80 Per Square Foot Office 200,001400,000 s . ft. $0.06672 $0.44251 $0.23443 $0.26540 $8.17635 $9.19 Per Square Foot Office Greater than 400,000 s . ft. $0.06044 $0.40086 $0.21236 $0.24042 $7.94551 $8.86 Per Square Foot Office - Medical 10,000 sf or less $0.08948 $0.59348 $0.31441 $0.35595 $21.10101 $22.45 Per Square Foot Office - Medical >10,000 s . ft. $0.13029 $0.86420 $0.45783 $0.51832 $30.37948 $32.35 Per Square Foot Pharmacy/DrugPharmacy/Drug Store $0.15384 $1.02038 $0.54056 $0.61199 $11.78401 $14.11 Per Square Foot Quick Lube $91.05 $603.90 $319.93 $362.20 $11,687.51 $13,064.59 Per Bay Restaurant - Fast Food w/Drive-Thru $0.69856 $4.63334 $2.45460 $2.77894 $101.65235 $112.22 Per Square Foot Restaurant- High Turnover** $21.19 $140.56 $74.46 $84.30 $1,794.90 $2,115.41 Per Seat Restaurant - Low Turnover** $17.27 $114.53 $60.68 $68.69 $1,151.71 $1,412.88 Per Seat Restaurant - Fast Casual** $0.69856 $4.63334 $2.45460 $2.77894 $68.10700 $78.67 Per Square Foot Restaurant - Fast Food w/Drive-Thru (2 meals) $0.69856 $4.63334 $2.45460 $2.77894 $95.76200 $106.33 Per Square Foot Retail 6,000 S . Ft. or Less $0.19230 $1.27547 $0.67571 $0.76499 $5.72332 $8.63 Per Square Foot Retail 6,001-25,000 S . Ft. $0.19230 $1.27547 $0.67571 $0.76499 $10.56800 $13.48 Per Square Foot Retail 25,001-50,000 S . Ft. $0.19230 $1.27547 $0.67571 $0.76499 $13.77400 $16.68 Per Square Foot Retail 50,001-100,000 S . Ft. $0.19230 $1.27547 $0.67846 $0.76499 $13.77400 $16.69 Per Square Foot Retail 100,001-150,000 S . Ft. $0.19230 $1.27547 $0.62055 $0.76499 $13.77400 $16.63 Per Square Foot Retail 150,001-200,000 S . Ft. $0.18759 $1.24423 $0.75845 $0.74625 $13.76357 $16.70 Per Square Foot Retail 200,001-400,000 S . Ft. $0.18367 $1.21820 $0.64536 $0.73064 $13.50712 $16.28 Per Square Foot Retail 400,001-600,000 S . Ft. $0.18210 $1.20779 $0.67295 $0.72440 $13.44364 $16.23 Per Square Foot Retail 600,001-1,000,000 S . Ft. $0.17032 $1.12970 $0.66743 $0.67756 $13.63048 $16.28 Per Square Foot Retail >1,000,000 S . Ft. $0.16404 $1.08805 $0.57642 $0.65258 $13.71416 $16.20 Per Square Foot School - Elementary (Private) $4.71 $31.24 $16.55 $18.73 $785.69 $856.92 Per Student School - Middle (Private) $5.49 $36.44 $19.31 $21.86 $921.00 $1,004.10 Per Student School- High School (Private) $6.28 $41.65 $22.07 $24.98 $983.00 $1,077.98 Per Student Supermarket" $0.16090 $1.06723 $0.56539 $0.64009 $21.41103 $23.84 Per Square Foot Tire Store 1 $105.18 $697.60 $369.57 $418.40 $8,930.43 $10,521.18 Per Bay Warehouse 1 $0.02198 $0.14577 $0.07722 $0.08743 $1.59900 $1.93 Per Square Foot * Fees for Convenience Store w/Gas are determined by different criteria. Remember to include ALL fees when calculating **If in a shopping center, or if on an outparcel of a shopping center, use Retail land use. CITY OF NAPLES AND CITY OF MARCO ISLAND: Collier County Law Enforcement, Fire, Water and Sewer are not assessed. Check with the City for their impact fees. CITY OF EVERGLADES: Collier County Road, Water and Sewer are not assessed. Impact Fee Administration 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Unit 103 Naples, FL 34104 239-252-6237 2of3 COLLIER COUNTY COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEES EFFECTIVE MARCH 30, 2021 Phase 3 Road Changes WATER AND WASTEWATER NON-RESIDENTIAL IMPACT FEES Impact fees are determined by meter size. Water and/or wastewater impact fees for alterations, expansions, or replacements are imposed only if the meter size is increased as a result of the alteration, expansion, or replacement. Meter Size ERC Factor Water Impact Fee Wastewater Impact Fee 3/4 inch 1.00 $3,382 $3,314 1 inch 1.67 $5,647 $5,534 1-1/2 inch 3.33 $11,262 $11,035 2 inch 5.33 $18,026 $17,663 3 inch 15.00 $50,730 $49,710 4 inch 33.33 $112,722 $110,455 6 inch 66.67 $225,477 $220,944 8 inch 116.67 $394,577 $386,644 Meter Size Note Meter size determined by the total fixture value connected to the meter and applying applicable provision in the current edition of the Florida Plumbing Code. Reference the Meter Sizing Form. FIRE IMPACT FEES RATE Greater Naples Fire District $0.26 Per sq. ft. under roof Immokalee Fire District $0.32 Per sq. ft. under roof North Collier Fire District $1.06 Per sq. ft. Ochopee Fire District $0.68 Per sq. ft. under roof Impact Fee Administration 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Unit 103 Naples, FL 34104 239-252-6237 pk6,-- 3.A-. >.`; . 3of3 COLLIER COUNTY COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEES EFFECTIVE MARCH 30, 2022 Phase 4 Road Changes LAND USE EMS GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS JAIL LAW ENFORCEMENT ROAD TOTAL (ROUNDED) WATER, WASTEWATER AND FIRE NOT INCLUDED (See Page 3) Auto Sales (Luxury) $0.08084 $0.53622 $0.28407 $0.32161 $12.38000 $13.603 Per Square Foot Auto Sales (New/Used) $0.11538 $0.76528 $0.40542 $0.45899 $16.62200 $18.37 Per Square Foot Bank/Savings: Drive -In** $0.17896 $1.18697 $0.62882 $0.71191 $21.25400 $23.96 Per Square Foot Bank/Savings: Walk -In** $0.17503 $1.16094 $0.61504 $0.69630 $12.30000 $14.95 Per Square Foot Business Park $0.07535 $0.49978 $0.26477 $0.29975 $11.30100 $12.44 Per Square Foot Car Wash - Automated $0.13814 $0.91626 $0.48540 $0.54954 $38.30300 $40.39 Per Square Foot Car Wash - Self -Service $68.29 $452.92 $239.94 $271.65 $11,848.00 $12,880.80 Per Bay Church $2.35 $15.62 $8.27 $9.37 $286.00 $321.61 Per Seat College - 7,500 students or less $7.85 $52.06 $27.58 $31.22 $1,973.00 $2,091.71 Per Student College -> 7,500 student $5.49 $36.44 $19.31 $21.86 $1,483.00 $1,566.10 Per Student Convenience Store (24 hours) $0.42934 $2.84768 $1.50862 $1.70795 $82.17000 $88.66 Per Square Foot Convenience Store w/Gas: 4 or less Fuel Positions $341.43 $2,264.61 $1,199.72 $1,358.24 based on sq ft range $5,164.00 * Per Fuel Position 5-6 Fuel Positions $290.41 $1,926.22 $1,020.46 $1,155.29 based on sq ft range $4,392.38 * Per Fuel Position 7-8 Fuel Positions $258.23 $1,712.77 $907.37 $1,027.27 based on sq ft range $3,905.64 * Per Fuel Position 9-10 Fuel Positions $230.76 $1,530.56 $810.85 $917.99 based on sq ft range $3,490.16 * Per Fuel Position 11-12 Fuel Positions $215.85 $1,431.65 $758.45 $858.66 based on sq ft range $3,264.61 * Per Fuel Position 13 or more Fuel Positions $203.29 $1,348.35 $714.32 $808.70 based on sq ft range $3,074.66 * Per Fuel Position < 2,000 s . ft. based on # of fuel pos based on # of fuel os based on # of fuel os based on # of fuel pos $6,910.00 $6,910.00 * Per Fuel Position 2,000 - 2,999 s . ft based on # of fuel pos based on # of fuel pos based on # of fuel os based on # of fuel pos $8,252.00 $8,252.00 * Per Fuel Position 3,000+ sq ft based on # of fuel pos based on # of fuel os based on # of fuel os based on # of fuel pos $9,262.00 $9,262.00 * Per Fuel Position Dance Studio/Gymnastics $0.17425 $1.15573 $0.61228 $0.69317 $9.32500 $11.96 Per Square Foot Day Care $3.92 $26.03 $13.79 $15.61 $1,097.00 $1,156.35 Per Student Furniture Store $0.01884 $0.12494 $0.06620 $0.07494 $3.67400 $3.96 Per Square Foot Golf Course $84.77 $562.25 $297.86 $337.22 $11,063.67 $12,345.77 Per Hole Golf Course - Bundled $25.42 $168.62 $89.33 $101.13 $3,318.94 $39703.44 Per Hole Home Improvement Store $0.14207 $0.94229 $0.49919 $0.56515 $8.51400 $10.66 Per Square Foot Hospital $0.10753 $0.71322 $0.37784 $0.42777 $9.16800 $10.79 Per Square Foot Hotel $63.58 $421.69 $220.63 $252.91 $3,702.00 $4,660.81 Per Room Hotel - All Suites $63.58 $421.69 $220.63 $252.91 $2,974.00 $3,932.81 Per Room Industrial - General Light $0.05416 $0.35921 $0.19030 $0.21545 $4.58400 $5.40 Per Square Foot Manufacturing $0.03925 $0.26030 $0.13790 $0.15612 $3.62900 $4.22 Per Square Foot Marina $14.91 $98.91 $52.41 $59.33 $2,376.00 $2,601.56 PerDry/Wet Berth Mine/Commercial Excavation 1 $0.00 1 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $14.00 1 $14.00 Per 1,000 Cubic Yards Mini -Warehouse $0.00471 $0.03124 $0.01655 $0.01873 $0.89100 $0.96 Per Square Foot Motel $59.65 $395.66 $209.60 $237.30 $2,074.00 $2,976.21 Per Room Movie Theater** $469.37 $3,113.19 $1,649.27 $1,867.20 $40,887.00 $47,986.03 Per Screen Impact Fee Administration 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Unit 103 Naples, FL 34104 34, y Gt 239-252-6237 1 COLLIER COUNTY COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEES EFFECTNE MARCH 30, 2022 Phase 4 Road Changes LAND USE EMS BUILDINGST JAIL LAW ENFORCEMENT ROAD TOTAL (ROUNDED) WATER, WASTEWATER AND FIRE NOT INCLUDED (See Page 3) Nursing Home $82.41 $546.63 $248.22 $327.85 $1,276.00 $2,481.11 Per Bed Office 6,000 s . ft. or less $0.07849 $0.52060 $0.27580 $0.31224 $8.60500 $9.79 Per Square Foot Office 6,001-100,000 s . ft. $0.09340 $0.61951 $0.32820 $0.37157 $8.60500 $10.02 Per Square Foot Office 100,001-200,000 s . ft. $0.07927 $0.52581 $0.27856 $0.31536 $8.60500 $9.80 Per Square Foot Office 200,001400,000 s . ft. $0.06672 $0.44251 $0.23443 $0.26540 $8.60500 $9.61 Per Square Foot Office Greater than 400,000 s . ft. $0.06044 $0.40086 $0.21236 $0.24042 $8.60500 $9.52 Per Square Foot Office - Medical 10,000 sf. or less $0.08948 $0.59348 $0.31441 $0.35595 $21.95500 $23.31 Per Square Foot Office - Medical >10,000 s . ft. $0.13029 $0.86420 $0.45783 $0.51832 $31.44400 $33.41 Per Square Foot Pharmacy/DrugPharmacy/Drug Store $0.15384 $1.02038 $0.54056 $0.61199 $12.61800 $14.94 Per Square Foot Quick Lobe $91.05 $603.90 $319.93 $362.20 $12,198.00 $13,575.08 Per Bay Restaurant - Fast Food w/Drive- Thru $0.69856 $4.63334 $2.45460 $2.77894 $104.27200 $114.84 Per Square Foot Restaurant - High Turnover** $21.19 $140.56 $74.46 $84.30 $1,814.00 $2,134.51 Per Seat Restaurant - Low Turnover** $17.27 $114.53 $60.68 $68.69 $1,163.00 $1,424.17 Per Seat Restaurant - Fast Casual"* $0.69856 $4.63334 $2.45460 $2.77894 $68.10700 $78.67 Per Square Foot Restaurant - Fast Food w/Drive- Thru (2 meals) $0.69856 $4.63334 $2.45460 $2.77894 $95.76200 $106.33 Per Square Foot Retail 6,000 S . Ft. or Less $0.19230 $1.27547 $0.67571 $0.76499 $5.73700 $8.65 Per Square Foot Retail 6,001-25,000 S . Ft. $0.19230 $1.27547 $0.67571 $0.76499 $10.56800 $13.48 Per Square Foot Retail 25,001-50,000 S . Ft. $0.19230 $1.27547 $0.67571 $0.76499 $13.77400 $16.68 Per Square Foot Retail 50,001-100,000 S . Ft. $0.19230 $1.27547 $0.67846 $0.76499 $13.77400 $16.69 Per Square Foot Retail 100,001-150,000 S . Ft. $0.19230 $1.27547 $0.62055 $0.76499 $13.77400 $16.63 Per Square Foot Retail 150,001-200,000 S . Ft. $0.18759 $1.24423 $0.75845 $0.74625 $13.77400 $16.71 Per Square Foot Retail 200,001-400,000 S . Ft. $0.18367 $1.21820 $0.64536 $0.73064 $13.77400 $16.55 Per Square Foot Retail 400,001-600,000 S . Ft. $0.18210 $1.20779 $0.67295 $0.72440 $13.77400 $16.56 Per Square Foot Retail 600,001-1,000,000 S . Ft. $0.17032 $1.12970 $0.66743 $0.67756 $13.77400 $16.42 Per Square Foot Retail >1,000,000 Sq. Ft. $0.16404 $1.08805 $0.57642 $0,65258 $13.77400 $16.26 Per Square Foot School - Elementary (Private) $4.71 $31.24 $16.55 $18.73 $815.00 $886.23 Per Student School - Middle (Private) $5.49 $36.44 $19.31 $21.86 $921.00 $1,004.10 Per Student School - High School (Private) $6.28 $41.65 $22.07 $24.98 $983.00 $1,077.98 Per Student Supermarket" $0.16090 $1.06723 $0.56539 1 $0.64009 1 $22.56900 1 $25.00 1 Per Square Foot Tire Store $105.18 $697.60 $369.57 $418.40 $9,318.00 $109908.75 Per Bay Warehouse $0.02198 $0.14577 $0.07722 $0.08743 $1.59900 $1.93 Per Square Foot * Fees for Convenience Store w/Gas are determined by different criteria. Remember to include ALL fees when calculating **If in a shopping center, or if on an outparcel of a shopping center, use Retail land use. CITY OF NAPLES AND CITY OF MARCO ISLAND: Collier County Law Enforcement, Fire, Water and Sewer are not assessed. Check with the City for their impact fees. CITY OF EVERGLADES: Collier County Road, Water and Sewer are not assessed. Impact Fee Administration 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Unit 103 Naples, FL 34104 s 239-252-6237�- COLLIER COUNTY COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEES EFFECTIVE MARCH 30, 2022 Phase 4 Road Changes WATER AND WASTEWATER NON-RESIDENTIAL IMPACT FEES Impact fees are determined by meter size. Water and/or wastewater impact fees for alterations, expansions, or replacements are imposed only if the meter size is increased as a result of the alteration, expansion, or replacement. Meter Size Water Impact Fee Wastewater Impact Fee Meter and Cross Connection Control Device Installation Charges With Service Line Without Service Line 3/4 inch $3,382 $3,314 $1,580 $584 1 inch $5,647 $5,534 $1,693 $693 1-1/2 inch $11,262 $11,035 $2,323 $1,171 2 inch $18,026 $17,663 $2,677 $1,476 3 inch $50,730 $49,710 County does not install 4 inch $112,722 $110,455 County does not install 6 inch $225,477 $220,944 County does not install 8 inch $394,577 $386,644 County does not install Meter Size Note Meter size determined by the total fixture value connected to the meter and applying applicable provision in the current edition of the Florida Plumbing Code. Reference the Meter Sizing Form. The County installs meters 2 -inch or smaller. FIRE IMPACT FEES RATE Greater Naples Fire District $0.26 Per sq. ft. under roof Immokalee Fire District $0.32 Per sq. ft. under roof North Collier Fire District $1.06 Per sq. ft. Ochopee Fire District $0.68 Per sq. ft. underroof Impact Fee Administration 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Unit 103 Naples, FL 34104 5 ./� 239-252-6237 h-� 3 r "Lt` C " 3 ,t i Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliercountyfl.gov (239) 252-2400 Pre -Application Meeting Sign -In Sheet PL# Lo z- i oao -33 �.? I Collier County Contact Information: Name Review Discipline Phone Email ❑ Maggie Acevedo North Collier Fire 252-2309 macevedo@northcollierfire.com ❑ Steve Baluch Transportation Planning 252-2361 stephen.baluch@colliercountyfl.gov ❑Shar A.Beddow MSM/Deputy Fire Marshal - Greater Naples Fire 241-1422 sbeddow@gnfire.org L7<Ray Bellows Zoning, Planning Manager 252-2463 raymond.bellows@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Laurie Beard PUD Monitoring 252-5782 laurie.beard@colliercountyfl.gov Craig Brown Environmental Specialist 252-2548 craig.brown @colliercountyfLgov Heidi Ashton Cicko Managing Asst. County Attorney 252-8773 heidi.ashton@colliercountyfl.gov ?-_'Thomas Clarke Zoning Operations Analyst 252-2584 thomas.clarke@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jamie Cook Development Review Director 252-6290 Jaime.cook@colliercountyfl.gov L1 Gabriela Castro Zoning Principal Planner 252-4211 gabriela.castro@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Maggie DeMeo North Collier Fire 252-2308 pdemeo@northcollierfire.com ❑ Eric Fey, P.E. Utility Planning 252-1037 eric.fey@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Tim Finn, AICP Zoning Principal Planner 252-4312 timothy.finn@colliercountyfl.gov Sue Faulkner GMP - Comprehensive Planning 252-5715 sue.faulkner@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Michael Gibbons Structural/Residential Plan Review 252-2426 michael.gibbons@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Storm Gewirtz, P.E. Engineering Stormwater 252-2434 storm.gewirtz@colliercountyfl.gov �Cormac Giblin, AICP Development Review -Planning Manager 252-5095 Cormac.giblin@colliercountyfl.gov L✓ Nancy Gundlach, AICP Zoning Principal Planner 252-2484 nancy.gundlach@colliercountyfLgov Rachel Hansen GMP—Comprehensive Planning 252-1142 Rachel. hansen@colliercountyfLgov ❑ Richard Henderlong Zoning Principal Planner 252-2464 richard.henderlong@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ John Houldsworth Engineering Subdivision 252-5757 john.houldsworth@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Alicia Humphries Right -Of -Way Permitting 252-2326 alicia.humphries@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Anita Jenkins Planning & Zoning Director 252-5095 Anita.jenkins@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ John Kelly Zoning Senior Planner 252-5719 john.kelly@colliercountyfl.gov Parker Klopf GMP —Comprehensive Planning 252-2471 Parker.klopf@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Troy Komarowski North Collier Fire 252-2521 tkomarowski@northcollierfire.com ❑ Sean Lintz North Collier Fire 597-9227 Blintz@northcollierfire.com ❑ Diane Lynch Operations Analyst 252-8243 diane.lynch @colIiercountyfLgov ❑ Thomas Mastroberto Greater Naples Fire 252-7348 thomas.mastroberto@colliercountyfl.gov Jack McKenna, P.E. Engineering Services 252-2911 1 jack. mckenna@colliercountyfLgov Updated 1/12/2021 Page 1 4 of 5 Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliercountvfl.gov (239) 252-2400 ❑ Matt McLean, P.E. Division Director - IF, CPP & PM 252-8279 matthew.mclean@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Michele Mosca, AICP Capital Project Planning 252-2466 michele.mosca@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Richard Orth Stormwater Planning 252-5092 richard.orth@colliercountyfl.gov Eric Ortman Zoning Principal Planner 252-1032 Eric.Ortman@colliercountyfl.gov Derek Perry Assistant County Attorney 252-8066 Derek. perry@colIiercountyfLgov ❑ Brandi Pollard Utility Impact fees 252-6237 brandi.pollard@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Todd Riggall North Collier Fire 597-9227 triggall@northcollierfire.com ❑ Brett Rosenblum, P.E. Development Review Principal Project Manager 252-2905 brett.rosenblum@colliercountyfl.gov le'James Sabo, AICP GMP, Comp Planning Manager 252-2708 james.sabo@colliercountyfl.gov Michael Sawyer Transportation Planning 252-2926 michael.sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Corby Schmidt, AICP Comprehensive Planning 252-2944 corby.schmidt@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Linda Simmons North Collier Fire 252-2311 Linda.Simmons@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Peter Shawinsky Architectural Review 252-8523 peter.shawinsky@colliercountyfl.gov Mark Templeton Landscape Review 252-2475 mark.templeton@coiliercountyfLgov ❑ Connie Thomas Client Services Supervisor 252-6369 Consuela.thomas@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jessica Velasco Client Services 252-2584 jessica.velasco@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jon Walsh, P.E. Building Review 252-2962 jonathan.walsh@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Kirsten Wilkie Environmental Review Manager 252-5518 kirsten.wilkie@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Christine Willoughby Development Review - Zoning 252-5748 christine.willoughby@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Daniel Zunzunegui North Collier Fire 252-2310 1 Daniel.Zunzunegui@colliercountyfl.gov Additional Attendee Contact Information: Name Representing Phone Email '1 R,L'L `N�S ,S nn .- 1�� 1� Cv.wIt-e ,.f A.cr 6G �- is a � ff1L 0 . 1 e VLi2h, /1 C ji1 ue— y1 Updated 1/12/2021 Page 1 5 of 5 Coe-r Coufzty Growth Management Department Zoning Division Applicant/Agent may also send site plans or conceptual plans for review in advance if desired. PL20210003321— Estates Mini Warehouses (RZ) Planner: Eric Ortman Assigned Ops Staff: Thomas Clarke STAFF FORM FOR SUPPLEMENTAL PRE -APPLICATION MEETING INFORMATION • Name and Number of who submitted pre-app request Greg Oherren — Shamrock Builders • Agent to list for PL# • Owner of property (all owners for all parcels) 4050 13th Ave LLC • Confirm Purpose of Pre-App: (Rezone, etc.) We are requesting a meeting to discuss rezoning an 5 acre tract of land located at 4050 13th Ave. SW in Collier County for a proposed 90,000- 125,000 square foot Mini Warehouse project. The site is currently zoned residential and is surrounded by a power station on 2 sides and 2 streets. The site is within the Golden Gate overlay district. Preferred time January 13, 14 Please list the density request of the project if applicable and number of homes/units/offices/docks (any that apply): N/A • Details about Project: REQUIRED Supplemental Information provided by: Name: Title: Email: Phone: Cancellation/Reschedule Requests: Contact Connie Thom Client Services Supervisor Consuela.Thomas@colliercountyfl.gov Phone:239-25411k Zoring Division • 2800 North Horseshoe DNe • Naples, Florida 34104.239-252-2400 • www.colhergov.net Collier County Growth Management Department Zoning Division Applicant/Agent may also send site plans or conceptual plans for review in advance if desired. PL20210003321— Estates Mini Warehouse (RZ) Planner: Eric Ortman Assigned Ops Staff: Thomas Clarke STAFF FORM FOR SUPPLEMENTAL PRE -APPLICATION MEETING INFORMATION • Name and Number of who submitted pre-app request �5 z • Agent to list for PL# • Owner of property (all owners for all parcels,) f • Confirm Purpose of Pre-App:(Rezone,,etc.) • Please list the density request of the project if applicable and number of homes/units/offices/docks (any that apply): • Details about Project: L r� 4e . v �,1 REQUIRED Supplemental Information provided by: Name: Title: Email: Phone: Cancellation/Reschedule Requests: Contact Connie Thomas -Client Services Supervisor COnSLlela.Thomas@coIlie rcountyfLgov Phone:239-252-2473 Created April 5, 2017 Location: G:\CDES Planning Services\Current\Zoning Staff Information Zorvng Wsion • 28W North Horseshoe DrW • Naples; FloWa 34104.23K52-2400 • www.cdimrgov net Greg O'Herren 4050 13th Ave SW PL20210003321— Additional Background Need for Market Study • There have been a number of new self -storage projects built west of 1- 75 and a few to the north of this site. Yes, a market study is needed • self -storage is a very localized 3-5 mile business similar to a grocery or drug store. People don't want to drive far to go to their storage unit. • 1 have visited/shopped the 30+ self -storages in the greater Naples area including the newer ones on Vanderbilt and Immokalee. • Covid has accelerated self -storage demand throughout the USA. Virtually all facilities in the Naples area are at historic 95%+ occupancy levels with rapidly increasing prices due to lack of supply. 1 understand people see lots of self -storage being built and assume we don't need any more. However the metrics for this location show that the market is dramatically under supplied as evidence by extremely high occupancy and increasing rates. • Florida has a rapidly growing population and thus driving more demand for storage. • We will build an institutional grade, first class self -storage with the latest security features. The current property generates a few thousand dollars in real estate taxes. We will probably pay $150,000+ in taxes. Market Study • 1 am interested in other possible competitors in the future and would like to know which areas within 4 miles are currently zoned for self -storage. • Also would be interested to know what other developers are seeking to build a new storage within 10 miles. • The site currently has an abandoned house on the site that has sat vacant for many years. • The site is surrounded by an electrical power plant on two sides. • The site is currently on well and septic. The utility company said sewer is not available and water availability is unknown— this limits a lot of commercial uses. • Self storage only requires one toilet so septic is not a problem. • The adjoining properties to the south are all commercial. No, between Green and Pine Ridge there are several PUDs, otherwise mostly Estates Zoning • This area is currently residential. self -storage is the lowest traffic generator for commercial uses. No, area is Estates Zoned • We are considering building a "Drive Thru" se►f-storage which I have not seen in this area. A semi -truck can drive thru the center of the building and customers can unload in out of the weather. We still need to sort out if this "drive thru" makes sense. • Here is a link to see the drive thru. https://shamrockbuilders.com/self-storage/ • All of the surrounding area is existing residential and will be our customers. Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.col liercou nty.gov Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: ❑ PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code ❑ Amendment to PUD- Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with an up-to-date application. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. A Model PUD Document is available online at http://www.colliercountyfl.gov/Home/ShowDocument?id=76983. REQUIREMENTS COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Cover Letter with Narrative Statement including a detailed description of why amendment is necessary 1 ❑ Completed Application with required attachments (download latest version) 1 Pre -application meeting notes 1 y ❑ Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 1 Property Ownership Disclosure Form 1 Notarized and completed Covenant of Unified Control 1 Completed Addressing Checklist 1 Warranty Deed(s) 1 ❑ List Identifying Owner and all parties of corporation 1 ❑ Signed and sealed Boundary Survey 1 ❑ Architectural Rendering of proposed structures 1 ❑ Current Aerial Photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. 1 ❑ Statement of Utility Provisions 1 ® ❑ Environmental Data Requirements pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 1 ❑ Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) packet at time of public hearings. Coordinate with project planner at time of public hearings. ❑ ❑ Listed or Protected Species survey, less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys. 1 ❑ Traffic Impact Study Fee cut,&,ec7--e,) 4r T,„, -,F 'kiiN S , t� 1 ❑ Historical Survey 1 ❑ ❑ School Impact Analysis Application, if applicable 1 ❑ ❑ Electronic copy of all required documents 1 ❑ Completed Exhibits A-F (see below for additional information)' ❑� ® ❑ List of requested deviations from the LDC with justification for each (this document is separate from Exhibit E) ❑ Checklist continues on next page March 4, 2020 Page 9 of 11 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.col liercou nty.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Revised Conceptual Master Site Plan 24" x 36"and One 8 %" x 11" copy ❑ ❑ Original PUD document/ordinance, and Master Plan 24" x 36" — Only if Amending the PUD ❑ ❑ }� I� Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru & underlined 1 ❑INS Copy of Official Interpretation and/or Zoning Verification 1 ❑ *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement 'The following exhibits are to be completed on a separate document and attached to the application packet: Exhibit A: List of Permitted Uses Exhibit B: Development Standards Exhibit C: Master Plan- See Chapter 3 E. 1. of the Administrative Code EA Exhibit D: Legal Description Exhibit E: List of Requested LDC Deviations and justification for each l� Exhibit F: List of Development Commitments If located in RFMU (Rural Fringe Mixed Use) Receiving Land Areas Pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08.A.2.a.2.(b.)i.c., the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239- 690-3500 for information regarding "Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan." PLANNERS — INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: ❑School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart ❑ Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Johnson Utilities Engineering: Eric Fey ❑ Parks and Recreation: Barry Williams (Director) Emergency Management: Dan Summers ❑ Immokalee Water/Sewer District: ❑ City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director ❑ Other: ❑ City of Naples Utilities ❑ Other: ASSOCIATED FEES FOR APPLICATION eD, Y, Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 PUD Rezone: $10,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone: $8,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre I I PUD Amendment: $6,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre 1-1 Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $2,250.00 '1� Environmental Data Requirements -EIS Packet (submittal determined at pre -application meeting): $2,500.00 ❑ Listed or Protected Species Review (when an EIS is not required): $1,000.00 Transportation Review Fees: — o Methodology Review: $500.00 *Additional fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting. o Minor Study Review: $750.00 o Major Study Review $1,500.00 March 4, 2020 Page 10 of 11 Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliercounty.gov (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Legal Advertising Fees: CCPC: $1,125.00 ca/BCC: $500.00 ❑ School Concurrency Fee, if applicable: o Mitigation Fees, if application, to be determined by the School District in coordination with the County Fire Code Plans Review Fees are not listed, but are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. *Additional fee for the 5th and subsequent re -submittal will be accessed at 20% of the original fee. Signature of Petitioner or Agent Printed named of signing party Date March 4, 2020 Page 11 of 11 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS($) 1, Matthew Maloney (print name), as Manager (title, if applicable) of 4o5o 13th Ave, uc (company, If applicable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner�applicant �contract purchasernand that: 1. 1 have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. Well authorize Wiimam Gregory o'Herren of Shamrock Builders, Inc. to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. *Notes. e if the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the core. pres. or v. pres. e if the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L. L. C.) or Limited Company (L. C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. * If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner" of the named partnership. * if the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee". o In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Afridavit of Authorization and that the facts stated in it are true. - ~-- 3 — v/ - c,2o 2 Signature Date STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The fore instrument was sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me on J31 22 (date) by M. � � A 10 rl � (name of person providing oath or affirmation) as _i�'�CA�-cc who is personally known to me or who has duced f-L QlMQ (type of identification) as identification. STAMPiSEAL Signature of Nota4 Publ c Syr Notary Public State of Florida Marisol Rotar My commission HH 024167 Expires 07/2712024 CP108-COA-001151155 REV 3124/14 DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS im"Jon U ON r wi offirW 5inf' ofFlorida websim Department of State / Division of Corporations / Search Records / Search by Entity Name / Detail by Entity Name Florida Limited Liability Company 4050 13TH AVE, LLC Filing Information Document Number L21000469464 FEI/EIN Number 87-3381604 Date Filed 11 /01 /2021 State FL Status ACTIVE Principal Address 5301 BOXWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34116 Mailing Address 5301 BOXWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34116 Registered Agent Name & Address Florida Department of State, Division of Corporations AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) 1 William Gregory O'Herren (print name), as President (title, if applicable) of shamrock Bunters. Inc. (company, If applicable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner= applicant =contract purchaser and that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action, 5. Well authorize RWA, inc. to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. "Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the Corp. pros. or V. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership- • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner' of the named partnership- • If the applicant is a trust, then they most include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee". • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the factsetated in it are true. Signature .;J.3) lz Date The foregoing instrument was sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me on -J 1 (date) by (name of person providing oath or affirmation), as who is personally known to me or who has produced PY) wfs J,J LM be" (type of identification) as identification. STAMPISEAL ., CHRISTINA E GRENNES a},.• - &Z Notary Public, State of Indiana $ SEAL; S Marion County GommFsalon Number NPOSS0222 My Commission Expires „l O anuary 14, 2030 CKOS-COA-00 1 15\1 55 REV 3/24114 UV v `Z Signature of Notary Publ!cJ FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS Attached are the forms and instructions to register a foreign profit corporation to transact business in Florida. The requirements are as follows: • Pursuant to section 607.1503(1), Florida Statutes, the attached application must be completed in its entirety. • The corporation must submit an original certificate of existence, no more than 90 days old, duly authenticated by the Secretary of State or the proper official having custody of corporate records in the state or country under the law of which it is incorporated. A photocopy is not acceptable. If the certificate is in a foreign language, a translation of the certificate under oath of the translator must be submitted. • There is a $70.00 registration fee and a letter of acknowledgment will be issued free of charge upon registration. • Certification fees are optional. Please submit an additional $8.75 if a certificate of status is needed. The fee for a certified copy of the application is $ 8.75 (plus $1 per page for each page over 8, not to exceed a maximum of $52.50). Please check the appropriate box on the COVER letter and send one check for the total amount made payable to the Florida Department of State. • The COVER letter included in this packet should be completed and submitted along with the certificate, application and check. Both the mailing address and courier address are noted in the COVER letter. • Important Information About the Requirement to File an Annual Report All Profit Corporations must file an Annual Report yearly to maintain "active" status. The first report is due in the year following formation. The report must be filed electronically online between January 1st and May 0. The fee for the annual report is $150. After May 1st a $400 late fee is added to the annual report filing fee. "Annual Report Reminder Notices" are sent to the e-mail address you provide us when you submit this document for filing. To file any time after January I", go to our website at www.sunbiz.org. There is no provision to waive the late fee. Be sure to file before May 1st. Any further inquiries concerning this matter should be directed to the Registration Section by calling (850) 245-6051 or writing the Registration Section, Division of Corporations, P.O. Box 6327, Tallahassee, FL 32314. CR2E007 (1/19) COVER LETTER TO: Registration Section Division of Corporations SUBJECT: SHAMROCK BUILDERS INC Name of corporation - must include suffix Dear Sir or Madam: The enclosed "Application by Foreign Corporation for Authorization to Transact Business in Florida," "Certificate of Existence," or "Certificate of Good Standing" and check are submitted to register the above referenced foreign corporation to transact business in Florida. Please return all correspondence concerning this matter to the following: William Gregory O'Herren SHAMROOK BUILDERS INC 9800 Westpoint Dr, Suite 200 Indianapolis, IN 46256 Name of Person Firm/Company Address City/State and Zip code Emily.Franklin@ShamrockBuilders.com E-mail address: (to be used for future annual report notification) For further information concerning this matter, please call: Emily Franklin Name of Person at 317 ) 863-3346 Area Code Daytime Telephone Number STREETICOURIER ADDRESS: Registration Section Division of Corporations The Centre of Tallahassee 2415 N. Monroe Street, Suite 810 Tallahassee, FL 32303 MAILING ADDRESS: Registration Section Division of Corporations P.O. Box 6327 Tallahassee, FL 32314 Enclosed is a check for the following amount: Please make check payable to: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE ❑ $70.00 Filing Fee ® $78.75 Filing Fee & ❑ $78.75 Filing Fee & ❑ Certificate of Status Certified Copy $87.50 Filing Fee, Certificate of Status & Certified Copy APPLICATION BY FOREIGN CORPORATION FOR AUTHORIZATION TO TRANSACT BUSINESS IN FLORIDA IN COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 607.1503, FLORIDA STATUTES, THE FOLLOWING IS SUBMITTED TO REGISTER A FOREIGN CORPORATION TO TRANSACT B USINESS IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA. l SHAMROCK BUILDERS INC (Enter name of corporation; must include "INCORPORATED," "COMPANY," "CORPORATION," "Inc.," "Co.," "Corp," "Inc," "Co," or "Corp.") SHAMROCK SELF STORAGE NAPLES INC (If name unavailable in Florida, enter alternate corporate name adopted for the purpose of transacting business in Florida) 2, INDIANA 3 35-1298876 (State or country under the law of which it is incorporated) (FE1 number, if applicable) 4 5/22/1973 S NIA 6 NIA (Date of incorporation) (Date of duration, if other than perpetual) (Date first transacted business in Florida, if prior to registration) (SEE SECTIONS 607.1501 & 607.1502, F.S., to determine penalty liability) 7. 9800 Westpoint Dr, Suite 200 Indianapolis, IN 46256 (Principal office street address) (Current mailing address, if different) 8. Name and street address of Florida registered agent: (P.O. Box NOT acceptable) Name: William Gregory O'Herren Office Address: 601 Seaview Ct. Marco Island (City) Florida 34145 (Zip code) 9. Registered agent's acceptance: Having been named as registered agent and to accept service of process for the above stated corporation at the place designated in this application, I hereby accept the appointment as registered agent and agree to act in this capacity. I further agree to comply with the provisions of all statutes relative to the proper and complete performance of my duties, and I am familiar with and accept the obligations of my position as registered agent. 10. Attached is a certificate of existe e the Department of State, by th Sec under the law of which it is incorporated. s signature) duly authenticated, not more than 90 days prior to delivery of this application to of State or other official having custody of corporate records in the jurisdiction 11. For initial indexing purposes, list names, titles and addresses of the primary officers and/or directors [up to six (6) total]: A. DIRECTORS ❑Chairman Name: William Gregory O'Herren ❑Vice Chairman Address: 9800 Westpoint Dr, Suitc200 Indianapolis, IN 46256 ❑D/irector L�resident /❑Vice President ❑ Secretary ❑ Treasurer ❑Other ❑Other ❑ Chairman Name: ❑ Vice Chairman Address: ❑Director ❑President ❑Vice President ❑ Secretary ❑ Other ❑Chairman Name: ❑ Vice Chairman Address: ❑ Director ❑President ❑Vice President ❑ Secretary ❑ Other ❑ Treasurer ❑ Other ❑ Treasurer ❑ Other George R Geiger ❑Chairman Name: ❑Vice Chairman Address: 9800 Westpoint Dr, Suite 200 ❑Director Indianapolis, IN 46256 ❑ Presidcnt ❑ Vice President );(Secretary ❑ Treasurer ❑ Other ❑ Other ❑Chairman Name: ❑Vice Chairman Address: ❑ Director ❑President ❑ Vice President ❑ Secretary ❑ Other ❑Chairman Name: ❑Vice Chairman Address: ❑ Director ❑ President ❑ Vice President © Secretary ❑ Other ❑ Treasurer ❑ Other ❑Treasurer ❑ Other Important Notice: Use an attachment to report more than six (6). The attachment will be imaged for reporting purposes only. Non -indexed individuals may be added a index when filing your Florida Department of State Annual Report form. 12. .,) Signature of Director or Officer The officer or director signingthisdocument (and who is listed in number 11 above) affirms that the facts stated herein are true and that he or she is aware that false information submitted in a document to the Department of State constitutes a third degree felony as provided for in s.817.155, F.S. 13. ,qfped or printed name and capacity of person signing application) State of Indiana Office of the Secretary of State CERTIFICATE OF EXISTENCE To Whom These Presents Come, Greeting: I, HOLLI SULLIVAN, Secretary of State of Indiana, do hereby certify that I am, by virtue of the laws of the State of Indiana, the custodian of the corporate records and the proper official to execute this certificate. I further certify that records of this office disclose that SHAMROCK BUILDERS INC duly filed the requisite documents to commence business activities under the laws of the State of Indiana on May 22, 1973, and was in existence or authorized to transact business in the State of Indiana on February 24, 2022. I further certify this Domestic For -Profit Corporation has filed its most recent report required by Indiana law with the Secretary of State, or is not yet required to file such report, and that no notice of withdrawal, dissolution, or expiration has been filed or taken place. All fees, taxes, interest, and penalties owed to Indiana by the domestic or foreign entity and collected by the Secretary of State have been paid. In Witness Whereof, I have caused to be affixed my signature and the seal of the State of Indiana, at the City of Indianapolis, February 24, 2022 HOLLI SULLIVAN SECRETARY OF STATE 197305-416 / 20222452699 All certificates should be validated here: https:Hbsd.sos.in.gov/ValidateCertificate Expires on March 26, 2022. AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) 1 William Gregory o'Herren (print name), as President (title, If applicable) of shamrock Builders, Inc. (company, If applicable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner= applicant =contract purchaserMand that: 1. 1 have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. Well authorize Denies Duke, PLLC to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. 'Notes. • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the carp. pres. or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the 'general partner" of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee". • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts stated in it are true. Signature STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER �////�zZ__ Date The foregoing instrument was sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me on 04111 %7-� (date) by () He, krW (name of person providing oath or affirmation), as nJA46C.1L who is personally known to me or who has produced I D U (XAIAJ-e, (type of identification) as identification. STAMPISEAL Signature of Notary Pu is ,"n`IM',"i CHRISTINA E GRENNES (% Notary Public, State of Indiana Marion County s t x. Commission Number NP0650222 MY Commission January 14, 2030ras CMB-COA-00115\155 RED' 312V14 0 Co(ier County Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1036 1 Email: GMDClient5ervices@colliercountyfl.gov www.colliercountyfl.gov PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the e1LenLa9e Ui suui inLrresL. I Name and Address I % of Ownership b. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the lercentage of StocK owned ny eacn: Name and Address % of Ownership C. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the iercentage of interest: Name and Address % of Ownership 01/2023 Page 1 of 3 Co icy County Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1036 1 Email: GMDClientServices@colliercountyfl.gov www.colliercountyfl.gov d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners: Name and Address % of Ownership e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners: f g Name and Address % of Ownership Shamrock Builders, Inc. William G. O'herren George R. Geiger Zs- Date of Contract: I? l,g Z Z If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or of iic.tfis, n d GUFPUT auUr}, parrnersnip, Ur [rust: Name and Address Date subject property acquired ❑ Leased: Term of lease years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: 01/2023 Page 2 of 3 4 cotCler County Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, maples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1036 1 Email: GMDClientServices@colliercountyfl.gov www.colliercountyfl.gov Date of option: Date option terminates: , or Anticipated closing date: i,1=1 11-04 PROP{- tY OWNERSHIP INFORIVIAiION Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form. Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest -holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition's final public hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. *The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Community Development Department I GMD Portal: https://cvportal.colliercountyfl.gov/cityviewweb Questions? Email: GMDclientservices@colliercountyfl.gov Agent ignature Agent/Owner Name (please print) Date 01/2023 Page 3 of 3 Detail by 6n 4 Name Q-Qpartment of State / Division of Corporations / Search Records / Search by Entity Narrte / Rtie viQus Qn LI',$t Next On List Return to List No Events No Name History Detail by Entity Name Foreign Profit Corporation SHAMROCK BUILDERS INC Filing Information Document Number F22000001883 FEI/EIN Number 35-1298876 Date Filed 03/07/2022 State W Status ACTIVE Principal Address 9800 WESTPOINT DR SUITE 200 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46256 Mailing Address 9800 WESTPOINT DR SUITE 200 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46256 Registered Agent Name,& Address O'HERREN, WILLIAM G 601 SEAVIEW CT. MARCO ISLAND, FL 34145 Officer/Director Detail Name & Address Title P O'HERREN, WILLIAM G 9800 WESTPOINT DR SUITE 200 SHAMROCK builders inc 3<y http://search.sunbiz.org/... 81-a65b2562137f&searchTenn=SHAMROCK%20builders%20inc&listNameOrder=SHAMROCKBUILDERS%2(14020550[2/2/2023 12:11:29 PNII Detail by Entity Name INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46256 Title S GEIGER, GEORGE R 9800 WESTPOINT DR SUITE 200 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46256 Annual Reports No Annual Reports Filed 03/07/2022 — Foreign Profit View image in PDF format Previous On List New n List BA ufi) j9-L ii �1 SHAMROCK builders inc Sorc.� No Events No Name History Florida Department of State, Division of Corporations http://scarch.suntnz orgt...S1-a65b2562137f&searchTerm=SHAMROCK%20bui[ders°/n2ainc&listNameOrder—S[iAMROCKBtJ11_DI:RS%204020550(2/2/2023 12:11:29 PM] Co*.r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT i GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 COVENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL The undersigned do hereby swear or affirm that we are the fee simple titleholders and owners of record of property commonly known as 4050 13 Ave SW, LLC 5031 Boxwood Way Naples, FL 34116 (Street address and City, State and Zip Code) and legally described in ExhibitA attached hereto. The property described herein is the subject of an application for Commercial planned unit development ( c PUD) zoning. We hereby designate GREG o'HERREN , legal representative thereof, as the legal representatives of the property and as such, these individuals are authorized to legally bind all owners of the property in the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop. This authority includes, but is not limited to, the hiring and authorization of agents to assist in the preparation of applications, plans, surveys, and studies necessary to obtain zoning approval on the site. These representatives will remain the only entity to authorize development activity on the property until such time as a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to Collier County. 1. 2 3 4. 5. The undersigned recognize the following and will be guided accordingly in the pursuit of development of the project: The property will be developed and used in conformity with the approved master plan including all conditions placed on the development and all commitments agreed to by the applicant in connection with the planned unit development rezoning. The legal representative identified herein is responsible for compliance with all terms, conditions, safeguards, and stipulations made at the time of approval of the master plan, even if the property is subsequently sold in whole or in part, unless and until a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to and recorded by Collier County. A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a failure to comply with any requirements, conditions, or safeguards provided for in the planned unit development process will constitute a violation of the Land Development Code. All terms and conditions of the planned unit development approval will be incorporated into covenants and restrictions which run with the land so as to provide notice to subsequent owners that all development activity within the planned unit development must be consistent with those terms and conditions. So long as this covenant is in force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the terms, safeguards, and conditions of the planned unit development, seek equitable relief as necessary to compel compliance. The County will not issue permits, certificates, or licenses to occupy or use any part of the planned unit development and the County may stop ongoing construction activity until the project is brought into compliance with ` ! planned unit development. l Owner//L)a n �c,y`� j ixe c+� bP z crf' JW14) ) 3� vcuC Owner Printed Name J Printaname STATE OF FLORIDA n n COUNTY OFX.Ga+E+ Iv 1OY1i(� The fore i instrument was acknowleged before me by means ofE h slcal day of 207,by (printed name of owner or qualifier) CA Such person(s) Notary Public must check applicable box: ❑Are personally known to me /) Has produced a current drivers license r��--L)cJ�c�C'?J�J ` Has prgJvn� as identification. Notary Signature: March\4, 2020 sence or[]onli y'ou'.•. HEI01 MORRIS Notary Public State of Florida Commission Expire 112670 025 �F d�'` My Comm. Expire, Assn. " annded through National Notary rization this Page 8 of 11 ENGINEERING EXHIBIT D 4050 13th Ave Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) LEGAL DESCRIPTION* TRACT 119, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT NO. 26, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, PAGE 15, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPT THE EAST 35 FEET AS DESCRIBED IN , PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPT THE EAST 35 FEET AS DESCRIBED IN ORDER OF TAKING RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 4963, PAGE 2748, AND LESS AND EXCEPT THE WEST 260 FEET. 4963, PAGE 2748, AND LESS AND EXCEPT THE WEST 260 FEET. , AND LESS AND EXCEPT THE WEST 260 FEET. TRACT 120, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT NO. 26, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, PAGE 15, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPT THE EAST 35 FEET AS DESCRIBED IN , PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPT THE EAST 35 FEET AS DESCRIBED IN ORDER OF TAKING RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 4963, PAGE 2748, AND LESS AND EXCEPT THE WEST 260 FEET. 4963, PAGE 2748, AND LESS AND EXCEPT THE WEST 260 FEET. , AND LESS AND EXCEPT THE WEST 260 FEET. CONTAINING 5.53 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. *Taken from Alta Survey Conducted By GradyMinor certified on 11/17/2021 - Plat Book 7, Pg 15 Page 1 of 1 4050 13th Ave SW CPUD PUDZ-PL 20210003321 August 25, 2022 co'LLier c014nty Growth Management Department ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following and email to GMD_Addressing@colliercountyfl.gov or submit in person to the Addressing Section at the address listed below. This form must be signed by Addressing personnel prior to the pre -application meeting. Please allow 3 business days for processing. Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Section. PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below. Complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type). ❑ BL (Blasting Permit) ❑ SDP (Site Development Plan) ❑ BD (Boat Dock Extension) ❑ SDPA (SDP Amendment) ❑ Carnival/Circus Permit ❑ SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP) ❑ CU (Conditional Use Permit) ❑ SIP (Site Improvement Plan) ❑ EXP (Excavation Permit) ❑ SIN (Insubstantial Change to SIP) ❑ FP (Final Plat) ❑ SNR (Street Name Change) ❑ LLA (Lot Line Adjustment) ❑ SNC (Street Name Change — Unplatted) ❑ PNC (Project Name Change) ❑ TDR (Transfer of Development Rights) ❑ PPL (Plans & Plat Review) ❑ VA (Variance) ❑ PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) ❑ VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit) ❑✓ PUD Rezone ❑ VRSFP (Vegetation Removal & Site Fill Permit) ❑ RZ (Standard Rezone) ❑ OTHER LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be attached) See attached Section 15, Township 49, Range 26 FOLIO (Property ID) Number(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) 37931120006,37931080007 STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned) 4050 13th Avenue SW • LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right-of-way • SURVEY (copy — only needed for unplatted properties) CURRENT PROJECT NAME (if applicable) PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable) PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existing projects/sites only) SDP or AR or PL # Addressing Checklist (Rev 12/2021) Page 1 of 2 Operations & Regulatory Management Division • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 • 239-252-2400 www.coll iercountyfl.gov co'LLier county Growth Management Department Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if application, indicate whether proposed or existing) Please Return Approved Checklist By: DEmail Applicant Name: RWA, Inc. / Jane E. Eichhorn Phone: (239) 597-0575 ❑Personally picked up Email: jeichhorn@consult-rwa.com Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Division. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number 37931120006, 37931080007 Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Approved by: a f �-k Date: Updated by: Date: 3/14/2022 IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR A NEW FORM SUBMITTED. Addressing Checklist (Rev 12/2021) Page 2 of 2 Operations & Regulatory Management Division • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 • 239-252-2400 www.coll iercountyfl.gov 3/11/22, 2:57 PM Print Map MAP LEGEND MEdoa Roma 2004. Collier County Property Appraiser. While the Collier County Property Appraiser is committed to providing the most accurate and up-to-date information, no warranties expressed or implied are provided for the data herein, its use, or its interpretation. https://maps.collierappraiser.com/mapprint.aspx?pagetitle=&orient=LANDSCAPE&paper=LETTER&minX=429366.010117409&minY=679410.966096239&maxX=431499.393605942&maxY=681117.67... 1 /2 Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Site 4050 13TH Site Zone Parcel No 37931080007 Address AVE SW Site City I NAPLES *Note 34116 , *Disclaimer Map No. Strap No. Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 41315 334300 119 041315 15 49 26 2.77 Legal GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 26 TR 119 LESS THE E 35 FT FOR ROW OR 4963 PG 2748 ,(ORDER OF TAKING), LESS W 260FT Ila a Area 9 100 Sub./Condo 334300 - GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 26 Use Code 9 1 - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentialitv) Date Book -Page Amount 11/22/21 6051-386 $ 375,000 06/14/18 5524-3392 $ 0 02/03/10 4534-1361 $ 295,000 10/14/97 2354-3357 $ 89,900 11/01/78 780-1134 $ 0 10/01/68 289-445 $ 11,100 School Other Total 4.889 6.7155 11.6045 2021 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Chanqe) Land Value $ 199,440 +� Improved Value $ 187,049 (_) Market Value $ 386,489 (_) Assessed Value $ 386,489 (_) School Taxable Value $ 386,489 m Taxable Value $ 386,489 If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Site Site Zone Parcel No 37931120006 Address Site City NAPLES *Note 34116 , *Disclaimer Map No. Strap No. Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 41315 334300 120 041315 15 49 26 2.77 Legal GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 26 TR 120 LESS THE E 35 FT OR 4963 PG 2748 (ORDER ,OF TAKING), LESS THE W 260FT Milla a Areas 100 Milla a Rates a *Calculations Sub./Condo 334300 - GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 26 School Other Total Use Code 9 0 - VACANT RESIDENTIAL 4.889 6.7155 11.6045 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentialitv) Date Book -Page Amount 11/22/21 6051-391 $ 375,000 08/22/84 1095-2086 $ 0 11/01/79 1 842-1405 1 $ 0 08/01/68 1 284-37 1 $ 9,800 2021 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Chanqe) Land Value $ 199,440 (+� Improved Value $ 0 (_) Market Value $ 199,440 (-) 10% Cap $ 58,114 (_) Assessed Value $ 141,326 (_) School Taxable Value $ 199,440 (_) Taxable Value $ 141,326 If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll INSTR 6168742 OR 6051 PG 391 E-RECORDED 12/4/2021 10:04 AM PAGES 4 CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT AND COMPTROLLER, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA Doc@.70 $2,625.00 REC $35.50 INDX $1.00 CONS $375,000.00 This instrument prepared by and after recording return to: Leo J. Salvatori, Esq. Salvatori Law Office, PLLC 5150 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 304 Naples, FL 34103 Consideration: $375M0.00 WARRANTY DEED THIS WARRAN Y>DEED, made this 23`d day of November, 2021, among LDJ ASSOCIATES, LTD" Florida limited partnership, having an address of 8800 S.W. 116 Street, Miami, Florida 33176 ("Granto'), and 4050 13Tt' AVE, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, having an address'of801 Boxwood Way, Naples, Florida 34116 ("Grantee"). WITNESSETH, that Gran or,: fi�pr and in consideration of the sum of TEN AND 00/100 DOLLARS ($10.00), and other good, and" -valuable considerations, in hand paid by Grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledg d;�has granted, bargained, sold and conveyed to Grantee, its heirs and assigns forever, the folloti described land, situate, lying and being in Collier County, State of Florida (the "Property')' Tract 120, GOLDEN GATE ESTATEragq,,A5,,,of NIT 26, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 7, ` the Public Records of Collier County, Florida; less and except the Eas 3Ifoe, as described in Order of Taking recorded in Official Records Book 4963, Page 748, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida; and less and except West-260 feet. Subject to covenants, restrictions and public utilifiy,,pasements of record; existing zoning and governmental regulations; and taxes` f) the year 2022 and all subsequent years, bearing Parcel ID No. 3793112000 . To have and to hold the same in fee simple forever. Grantor hereby covenants with said Grantee that the Grantor Isr awfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the Grantor has good right and lawful authority t c 1 and convey said land; that the Grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said land and will de nd �he same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Warranty Deed Page 1 Prolaw:659178 2 OR 6051 PG 392 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has set its hand and seal the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: ( 44 Witness No. 1 Signature l 6f) Witness No. 1 Witness No. 2 Signature I KzA Witness No. 2 i ted Name., STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing document was ack or ❑ online notarization, this ? l da General Partner of LDJ ASSOCIATES personally known to me, or who ,[A_ prod identification. IC LDJ ASSOCIATES, LTD., a Florida limited partnership Larry E. Brooks, as General Partner before me, by means of<izj-physical presence ember, 2021, by LARRY E. BROOKS, as i _Florida limited partnership, who [ ] is as Noi(ary Public �de,. PRINTED OR 9TAMPFD NAME OF NOTARY My Commission xres: ; raU GABRIG G �n MYCCIU{NII9S0N D(PIRES: AUG ,,' F F Bonded through lst; Warranty Deed Signature Page OR 6051 PG 393 No. WitnessJNNo. 1 Printed Name Witness No. 2 Witness No. 2 Printed STATE OF FLORIDAm COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing document or ❑ online notarization, this General Partner of LDJ ASSOC personally known to me, or who [ identification. AND By: David L. Brooks, as General Partner [edged before me, by means of ❑ physical presence f November, 2021, by DAVID L. BROOKS, as 'D., a Florida limited partnership, who [ ] is '...��ov� t'.ro,,.Ie as My Warranty Deed Signature Page Public EXI Bonded 'ED NAME OF NOTARY Expires: D. GARCIA 11%# GG 347478 06tol�r 20, 2023 *** OR 6051 PG 394 *** itness No. 1 Signature j w Witness No. 1 Printed Name W' ess No. 2 Signature �5�-r 1 KC IL ex Witness No. 2 Pnt4.ame STATE OF TEXAS. COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY LDJ ASSOCIATES, LTD., a Florida limited partnership By: - Ja s E. Brooks, as General Partner � The foregoing docttmeat has acknowledged before me, by means of ❑ physical presence or ❑ online notarization, this day of November, 2021, by JAMES E. BROOKS, as General Partner of LDJ ASSOCIATES, LTD ''a Florida limited partnership, who [ ] is personally known to me, or who [ r/] produced Yleoi-> IL (c ' c as identification. r JAYNA MCCARTHY� . �_, Notary Public Notary Public, State of Texas, Comm. Expires 10-03-2025', NotarvID 5470322 R_kv�fa !�t"�CY/T7 t�lf � EV OR STAMPED NAME OUNOTARY emission Expires: Warranty Deed Signature Page INSTR 6168740 OR 6051 PG 386 E-RECORDED 12/4/2021 10:04 AM PAGES 3 CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT AND COMPTROLLER, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA Doc@.70 $2,625.00 REC $27.00 CONS $375,000.00 This instrument prepared by and after recording return to: Leo J. Salvatori, Esq. Salvatori Law Office, PLLC 5150 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 304 Naples, FL 34103 Consideration: $375,000.00 WARRANTY DEED THIS WARRANT1.] PEED, made this 23rd day of November, 2021, among LARRY E. BROOKS, INDIVIDIALLY AND AS TRUSTEE OF THE LARRY E. BROOKS REVOCABLE TRUST DATED MARCH 29, 2007, and LARRY E. BROOKS AND MARIA ROLDAN BROOKS NDIVIDUALLY AND AS TRUSTEES OF THE LARRY E. BROOKS AND MARIA,AOLDAN BROOKS REVOCABLE TRUST DATED JUNE 14, 2018, with full power and aW' 6ri either to protect, conserve, sell, lease, encumber, or otherwise manage and dispose of *46al`property described herein, having an address of 8800 S.W. 116 Street, Miami, Florida 33 7 (` Orantor"), and 4050 13T11 AVE, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, having all ,a`de ress.�of 5301 Boxwood Way, Naples, Florida 34116 ("Grantee").f, . WITNESSETH, that Grantor, for angXonsideration of the sum of TEN AND 00/100 DOLLARS ($10.00), and other good and valuabf e considerations, in hand paid by Grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has gran d ,,-t, rgained, sold and conveyed to Grantee, its heirs and assigns forever, the following described' mid, situate, lying and being in Collier County, State of Florida (the "Property"): Tract 119, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT 26, thereof as recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 15, of the' County, Florida; less and except the East 35 feet as de recorded in Official Records Book 4963, Page 2748, Collier County, Florida; and less and except the West 2 Subject to covenants, restrictions and public utility ease zoning and governmental regulations; and taxes for subsequent years, bearing Parcel ID No. 37931080007. To have and to hold the same in fee simple forever. ng to the map or plat is Records of Collier :din Order of Taking he )Public Records of the yf existing and all Grantor hereby covenants with said Grantee that the Grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the Grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that the Grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. The subject property is not the constitutional homestead of the Grantor, nor Grantor's family members, nor is it contiguous to Grantor's homestead. Warranty Deed Page 1 Prolaw:657330 2 OR 6051 PG 387 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has set its hand and seal the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: Witness No. 1 Signature %J Witness No. I 111iinfeAName Witness No. 2 Si AA Witness No. 2 Prin ed Name,, STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing document was a. k or ❑ online notarization, this INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TRUSTEE i DATED MARCH 29, 2007, who [ ) Larry f7 rooks, Individually and as Trustee of the Larry E. Brooks Revocable Trust dated March 29, 2007 I before me, by means of -d-physical presence ovember, 2021, by LARRY E. BROOKS, ARRY E. BROOKS REVOCABLE TRUST n lly known to me, or who [A, produced PRINTED OR My Comm 1#�D NAME OF NOTARY FAires: < i Z 9c_5 BRIEL COLON MV =Upf GG331041 C23,2023 State Insurance Warranty Deed Signature Page *** OR 6051 PG 388 *** Signed, sealed and delivered in LARRY E. BROOKS AND MARIA the presence of: ROLDAN BROOKS REVOCABLE C'C TRUST DATED JUNE 14, 2018 Wit tress No. 1 Signature , /rl / � B r" t`�a��`� � C� �` d yLarry E. Brooks, Individually and as Witness No. 1 Pri ame Trustee of the Larry E. Brooks and 4.-.-- Maria Roldan Brooks Revocable Trust dated June 14, 2018 Witness No. 2`51'gnIFi ' 'e n xzvz ' By: Witness No. 2 rint d me x4 Maria Roldan Brooks, Individually and as Trustee of the Larry E. Brooks and Maria Roldan Brooks Revocable Trust dated June 14, 2018 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing document was'aokne) or ❑ online notarization, this -7 Z-- day o: MARIA ROLDAN BROOKS, INDIVIDI BROOKS AND MARIA ROLDAN BROOI who [ ] are personally known to me, or who as identification. before me, by means ofq_physical presence nber, 2021, by LARRY E. BROOKS AND AND AS TRUSTEE OF THE LARRY E. TgCABLE TRUST DATED JUNE 14, 2018, au°ced R / C. C"t'_ .e PRINTED OR STvIPI D NAME OF NOTARY My CommissicirExres: *! GA9RIEL COLON dOM MISSI®W GG331641 (PIRES: AUG 23, 2023 0.00, Ran cGh 1 st State Insurance Warranty Deed Signature Page JRM�-" ENGINEERING 4050 131" Ave Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) List of Owner and all Parties of Corporation • Owner: 4050 13th Ave LLC DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS im"Jon U ON r wi offirW 5inf' ofFlorida websim Department of State / Division of Corporations / Search Records / Search by Entity Name / Detail by Entity Name Florida Limited Liability Company 4050 13TH AVE, LLC Filing Information Document Number L21000469464 FEI/EIN Number 87-3381604 Date Filed 11 /01 /2021 State FL Status ACTIVE Principal Address 5301 BOXWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34116 Mailing Address 5301 BOXWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34116 Registered Agent Name & Address Florida Department of State, Division of Corporations NE CORNE OF TRACT 119 I I � I O 00 oML 00 \ m cn I \ I SMN Alk N\ I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 30.0' I I 1 640'AWAY 5 I I I I I M 1 � I I � I / I I I I I I I \ �7.5' ROW EASEMENT (OR 244, PG 948) (OR 1082, PG 326) EXCEPTION 7 U")LLJ I J I I I`- �Z � I j 0 i� �o = 1L U M C 1 o I Q w AI \ I / I I i I ( 1 I I I I I I II I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I I I I 1 I I I I I I I � I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I � I I v Ld w o O 0 M o 00 00 z XIII I I I I I I I � I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I � I 1 I o I FMN-JOHNSON o LB #642 0.13' S 00 0 00 FOUND cn COLLIER BLVD (ASPHALT ROADWAY) CONC CURB CONC. SIDEWALK i 'R 'R � o " T / +j 7/co II ® oYo--- \ __—--\ ---------—Z 0a- ------�----\—\--I--\-------------- cj OR 4944 ,W � PG 1678)ooa \ / \ I FIR 1/2" / oW2 \ \\ o ;� \ I i FIR of \ oar I \/ \ NO CAP / LB #5151 0 0 Q 1— FIR \ o a o 1 / + 0.32' W S 0029'09" E '�� FLAGPOLE I \ LB #5151 1 1 660.00' / I • -� 330.00' (P) , — — —------------•----------------' -------------J----------- /------------------ FIR I ----0.00 ----------------------------------------------------- LLJ - - - - --------------------- �- I zU�� 7------ ZU- - --�--i - LB #5151 LLj J 3Wcl,o \ �Waz // \�J/ \ �WaZ—/ \` I u- Ja� \ o' o I S '� W \ o \ / 44.5' 40 / � Z w ell 106.9'\\ I I / SEE DETAIL / I I M— I I FPL AERIAL ti. o � z� 30.0I /---� I I \ it I I �/'To ' I oZ/tj i UTILITY EASEMENT APPROXIMATE = _ (OR 5452, PG 1700) I N o I / \ PXCtPTION 9 FLOOD ZONE LINEtl I l � \ / I / I / I \--__ZONE X --� Q ZONE AH m ''5 $PgqiiC1S,•' s I ® (12.0' NAVD88) I o0 CD CD cD // PARCEL 1 PARCEL 2 w CONC. PARKING' I ^ w Ir - 1'I PARCEL N0. 37931080007 PARCEL N0. 37931120006 ¢I� o �J r • :/?� A PORTION OF TRACT 119 A PORTION OF TRACT 120 I z w Ir w GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT NO. 26, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT NO. 26, ,co (PB 7, PG 15) (PB 7, PG 15) I w ~ o U (D I ! Y OWNER: LARRY E BROOKS REV TRUST OWNER: LDJ ASSOC LTD [If wl o O 5 I Llj o � �I o N I I Ic� I I I I I 50.0' FPL EASEMENT / I I I I (OR 5452, PG 1708) • /tXCEPT16N 11 Z I • Y I 7.5' ROW EASEMENT i I I I� I (OR 244, PG 948) l II a lI (OR 1082, PG 326) —11.7'x12.0' EXCEPTION 7 1 I I SHED 20D NAIL NO ID T 30.00' 113.8 of 01� �i FIR `V LB #642 0.14' S �I I I u'� I of MI �I 001 cn FIR 5/8" NO ID 0 15' 30' 60' SCALE: 1" = 30' THIS PLAN MAY HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED FROM INTENDED DISPLAY SCALE FOR REPRODUCTION REASONS LEGEND I GRAVEL AREA wl DIRT PATH I I I I I I \ I I I I I — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — J 330.00' (P) 330.00' (P) IN 0°29'09" W — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — � — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 660 00- — — — — — — — S 00'27'31" E (D) T PARCEL 2 / (OR PG 1691) BERM (IMPROVED) — — — — — (IMPROVED) OWNER: FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: GRAVEL AREA APPROXIMATE BASE FLOOD / ELEVATION LINE 12.0' (NAVD 88) i jl ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I PARCEL 1: TRACT 119, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT NO. 26, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7. PAGE 15, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPT THE EAST 35 FEET AS DESCRIBED IN ORDER OF TAKING RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 4963, PAGE 2748, AND LESS AND EXCEPT THE WEST 260 FEET. PARCEL 2: TRACT 120, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT NO. 26, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7. PAGE 15, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPT THE EAST 35 FEET AS DESCRIBED IN ORDER OF TAKING RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 4963. PAGE 2748, AND LESS AND EXCEPT THE WEST 260 FEET. CONTAINING 5.53 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. POC POINT OF COMMENCEMENT (P) PER PLAT TG TOP OF GRATE ELEVATION POB POINT OF BEGINNING (M) MEASURED RIM RIM ELEVATION RIP 0 FOUND IRON PIPE (C) CALCULATED INV INVERT ELEVATION FIR 0 FOUND 5/8" IRON ROD (D) PER DEED ELEV ELEVATION SIR 0 SET 5/8" IRON ROD w/CAP, L.B. #5151 (EA) TEMPORARY EASEMENT AGREEMENT A/C AIR CONDITIONING UNIT FCM ❑ FOUND 4"x4" CONCRETE MONUMENT BOBOIL• CONCRETE BOLLARD MzsmBACK FLOW PREVENTOR SCM 0 SET CONC. MONUMENT w/ALUMINUM GT GREASE TRAP © CABLE T.V. BOX/RISER DISK, L.B.# 5151 PB PLAT BOOK FPK A FOUND PARKER KALON NAIL PG PAGE 0 CATCH BASIN/INLET CO O CLEAN OUT SPK & SET PARKER KALON NAIL w/BRASS OR OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK CONC. CONCRETE DISK, L.B.# 5151 R.O.W. RIGHT-OF-WAY CHW CONCRETE HEAD WALL FDH 0 FOUND DRILL HOLE EDP EDGE OF PAVEMENT CENTERLINE SDH SET DRILL HOLE U.E. UTILITY EASEMENT CMP CORRUGATED METAL PIPE FMN A FOUND MAG NAIL LB LICENSED BUSINESS CPP CORRUGATED PLASTIC PIPE FND FOUND PSM PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER FPL FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT SIN& SET MAG NAIL w/BRASS SPC STATE PLANE COORDINATES DISK, L.B.# 5151 CLF CHAIN LINK FENCE BSUE BONITA SPRINGS UTILITY EASEMENT DE DRAINAGE EASEMENT AE ACCESS EASEMENT OD DRAINAGE MANHOLE SV 0 SEWER VALVE ELECTRIC MANHOLE SIGN ON POLE ❑E ELECTRIC BOX/RISER/METER (DTELEPHONE MANHOLE .El,FIRE HYDRANT ❑T TELEPHONE BOX/RISER ET ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER TL ❑O TRAFFIC LIGHT © GAS SERVICE/METER UG UNDERGROUND GT GREASE TRAP nl UTILITY POLE - WOOD --) GUY ANCHOR 0 UTILITY POLE - CONCRETE IRV 0 IRRIGATION VALVE ❑W WATER METER ICV 0 IRRIGATION CONTROL VALVE WV 0 WATER VALVE "� LIGHT POLE YD �O YARD DRAIN Ficl MITERED END WBSP ® WATER BACTERIAL SAMPLE POINT -//7,�-OVERHEAD WIRES EOW EDGE OF WATER RCP REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE WELL SANITARY MANHOLE NAVD 88 NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 UNDERGROUND BURIED CABLE MARKER PILE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT - FIRz m m # Z 0 (D rn \ LB 5151 � �, o PARCEL 3 / w IZ a W (OR 5452, PG 1691) / — — — — — _o N o — — (IMPROVED) BERM in o o OWNER: FLORIDA POWER &Z1GHI=COMPANY — — NOTES: 1. BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE FLORIDA STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, EAST ZONE, NORTH AMERICAN DATUM OF 1983, NATIONAL GEODETIC SURVEY ADJUSTMENT OF 1990 OBTAINED USING RTK GPS OBSERVATIONS ON THE FDOT NETWORK AND ARE REFERENCED TO THE NORTH LINE OF TRACT 119, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT NO. 26, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, PAGE 15, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING N 89'30'51" E. 2. THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE COMMITMENT PROVIDED BY OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, WITH A FILE NUMBER FH MALONEYPFBRO, HAVING AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF OCTOBER 17, 2021 AT 11:00 PM. AND MAY BE SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RESERVATIONS AND/OR RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. ALL MATTERS OF TITLE SHOULD BE REFERRED TO AN ATTORNEY AT LAW. 3. THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED WITHIN FLOOD ZONE X HAVING NO BASE FLOOD ELEVATION AND FLOOD ZONE AH HAVING A BASE FLOOD ELEVATION OF 12.0' (NAVD 88), PER THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP # 12021C-0404H, DATED 5/16/12. FLOOD ZONE LINES SHOWN HEREON WERE TAKEN FROM A COLLIER COUNTY GIS FILE AND ARE ASSUMED TO BE APPROXIMATE. 4. CERTAIN FEATURES REPRESENTED BY SYMBOLS MAY NOT BE SHOWN AT THEIR TRUE LOCATION AND/OR SCALE IN ORDER TO BE ABLE TO DEPICT THEM ON THIS MAP. 5. DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE IN U.S. SURVEY FEET AND DECIMALS THEREOF. 6. THIS SURVEY DOES NOT ADDRESS ANY ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS, ENDANGERED WILDLIFE OR JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS, IF ANY, EXCEPT AS SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY. 7. THIS CERTIFICATION IS ONLY FOR THE LANDS DESCRIBED HEREON. IT IS NOT A CERTIFICATION OF TITLE, ZONING, SETBACKS, OR FREEDOM OF ENCUMBRANCES. 8. THIS SURVEY IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE ORIGINAL SIGNATURE AND SEAL OR THE DIGITAL SIGNATURE AND DIGITAL SEAL OF A LICENSED FLORIDA SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. NO ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS TO THIS SURVEY MAP ARE PERMITTED WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE SIGNING PARTY. 9. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, BELOW GROUND UTILITIES AND FOUNDATIONS WERE NOT LOCATED FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SURVEY. 10. BY SIGNING BELOW I CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY WAS MADE UNDER MY DIRECTION AND THAT IT MEETS THE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE SET FORTH BY THE BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS IN CHAPTER 5J-17.051, F.A.C, PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 472.027, FLORIDA STATUTES. 11. THE TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT SHOWN HEREON MAY HAVE EXTINGUISHED. 12. OWNERSHIP INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON WAS TAKEN FROM THE COLLIER COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER WEBSITE ON 11/4/2021. 13. NO ZONING REPORT WAS PROVIDED AT TIME OF SURVEY. 14. A REQUEST WAS MADE THROUGH SUNSHINE 811 TO HAVE UTILITIES MARKED. NO MARKINGS WERE OBSERVED AT THE TIME OF THE FIELD SURVEY. I I I ) FIR 1 /2" LB #642 0.31' W, 0.32' S / I OD DRAINAGE MANHOLE SV 0 SEWER VALVE ELECTRIC MANHOLE SIGN ON POLE ❑E ELECTRIC BOX/RISER/METER (DTELEPHONE MANHOLE .El,FIRE HYDRANT ❑T TELEPHONE BOX/RISER ET ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER TL ❑O TRAFFIC LIGHT © GAS SERVICE/METER UG UNDERGROUND GT GREASE TRAP nl UTILITY POLE - WOOD --) GUY ANCHOR 0 UTILITY POLE - CONCRETE IRV 0 IRRIGATION VALVE ❑W WATER METER ICV 0 IRRIGATION CONTROL VALVE WV 0 WATER VALVE "� LIGHT POLE YD �O YARD DRAIN Ficl MITERED END WBSP ® WATER BACTERIAL SAMPLE POINT -//7,�-OVERHEAD WIRES EOW EDGE OF WATER RCP REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE WELL SANITARY MANHOLE NAVD 88 NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 UNDERGROUND BURIED CABLE MARKER PILE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT - FIRz m m # Z 0 (D rn \ LB 5151 � �, o PARCEL 3 / w IZ a W (OR 5452, PG 1691) / — — — — — _o N o — — (IMPROVED) BERM in o o OWNER: FLORIDA POWER &Z1GHI=COMPANY — — NOTES: 1. BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE FLORIDA STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, EAST ZONE, NORTH AMERICAN DATUM OF 1983, NATIONAL GEODETIC SURVEY ADJUSTMENT OF 1990 OBTAINED USING RTK GPS OBSERVATIONS ON THE FDOT NETWORK AND ARE REFERENCED TO THE NORTH LINE OF TRACT 119, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT NO. 26, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, PAGE 15, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING N 89'30'51" E. 2. THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE COMMITMENT PROVIDED BY OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, WITH A FILE NUMBER FH MALONEYPFBRO, HAVING AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF OCTOBER 17, 2021 AT 11:00 PM. AND MAY BE SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RESERVATIONS AND/OR RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. ALL MATTERS OF TITLE SHOULD BE REFERRED TO AN ATTORNEY AT LAW. 3. THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED WITHIN FLOOD ZONE X HAVING NO BASE FLOOD ELEVATION AND FLOOD ZONE AH HAVING A BASE FLOOD ELEVATION OF 12.0' (NAVD 88), PER THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP # 12021C-0404H, DATED 5/16/12. FLOOD ZONE LINES SHOWN HEREON WERE TAKEN FROM A COLLIER COUNTY GIS FILE AND ARE ASSUMED TO BE APPROXIMATE. 4. CERTAIN FEATURES REPRESENTED BY SYMBOLS MAY NOT BE SHOWN AT THEIR TRUE LOCATION AND/OR SCALE IN ORDER TO BE ABLE TO DEPICT THEM ON THIS MAP. 5. DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE IN U.S. SURVEY FEET AND DECIMALS THEREOF. 6. THIS SURVEY DOES NOT ADDRESS ANY ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS, ENDANGERED WILDLIFE OR JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS, IF ANY, EXCEPT AS SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY. 7. THIS CERTIFICATION IS ONLY FOR THE LANDS DESCRIBED HEREON. IT IS NOT A CERTIFICATION OF TITLE, ZONING, SETBACKS, OR FREEDOM OF ENCUMBRANCES. 8. THIS SURVEY IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE ORIGINAL SIGNATURE AND SEAL OR THE DIGITAL SIGNATURE AND DIGITAL SEAL OF A LICENSED FLORIDA SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. NO ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS TO THIS SURVEY MAP ARE PERMITTED WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE SIGNING PARTY. 9. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, BELOW GROUND UTILITIES AND FOUNDATIONS WERE NOT LOCATED FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SURVEY. 10. BY SIGNING BELOW I CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY WAS MADE UNDER MY DIRECTION AND THAT IT MEETS THE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE SET FORTH BY THE BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS IN CHAPTER 5J-17.051, F.A.C, PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 472.027, FLORIDA STATUTES. 11. THE TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT SHOWN HEREON MAY HAVE EXTINGUISHED. 12. OWNERSHIP INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON WAS TAKEN FROM THE COLLIER COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER WEBSITE ON 11/4/2021. 13. NO ZONING REPORT WAS PROVIDED AT TIME OF SURVEY. 14. A REQUEST WAS MADE THROUGH SUNSHINE 811 TO HAVE UTILITIES MARKED. NO MARKINGS WERE OBSERVED AT THE TIME OF THE FIELD SURVEY. I I I ) FIR 1 /2" LB #642 0.31' W, 0.32' S / I - FIRz m m # Z 0 (D rn \ LB 5151 � �, o PARCEL 3 / w IZ a W (OR 5452, PG 1691) / — — — — — _o N o — — (IMPROVED) BERM in o o OWNER: FLORIDA POWER &Z1GHI=COMPANY — — NOTES: 1. BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE FLORIDA STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, EAST ZONE, NORTH AMERICAN DATUM OF 1983, NATIONAL GEODETIC SURVEY ADJUSTMENT OF 1990 OBTAINED USING RTK GPS OBSERVATIONS ON THE FDOT NETWORK AND ARE REFERENCED TO THE NORTH LINE OF TRACT 119, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT NO. 26, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, PAGE 15, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING N 89'30'51" E. 2. THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE COMMITMENT PROVIDED BY OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, WITH A FILE NUMBER FH MALONEYPFBRO, HAVING AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF OCTOBER 17, 2021 AT 11:00 PM. AND MAY BE SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RESERVATIONS AND/OR RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. ALL MATTERS OF TITLE SHOULD BE REFERRED TO AN ATTORNEY AT LAW. 3. THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED WITHIN FLOOD ZONE X HAVING NO BASE FLOOD ELEVATION AND FLOOD ZONE AH HAVING A BASE FLOOD ELEVATION OF 12.0' (NAVD 88), PER THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP # 12021C-0404H, DATED 5/16/12. FLOOD ZONE LINES SHOWN HEREON WERE TAKEN FROM A COLLIER COUNTY GIS FILE AND ARE ASSUMED TO BE APPROXIMATE. 4. CERTAIN FEATURES REPRESENTED BY SYMBOLS MAY NOT BE SHOWN AT THEIR TRUE LOCATION AND/OR SCALE IN ORDER TO BE ABLE TO DEPICT THEM ON THIS MAP. 5. DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE IN U.S. SURVEY FEET AND DECIMALS THEREOF. 6. THIS SURVEY DOES NOT ADDRESS ANY ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS, ENDANGERED WILDLIFE OR JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS, IF ANY, EXCEPT AS SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY. 7. THIS CERTIFICATION IS ONLY FOR THE LANDS DESCRIBED HEREON. IT IS NOT A CERTIFICATION OF TITLE, ZONING, SETBACKS, OR FREEDOM OF ENCUMBRANCES. 8. THIS SURVEY IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE ORIGINAL SIGNATURE AND SEAL OR THE DIGITAL SIGNATURE AND DIGITAL SEAL OF A LICENSED FLORIDA SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. NO ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS TO THIS SURVEY MAP ARE PERMITTED WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE SIGNING PARTY. 9. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, BELOW GROUND UTILITIES AND FOUNDATIONS WERE NOT LOCATED FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SURVEY. 10. BY SIGNING BELOW I CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY WAS MADE UNDER MY DIRECTION AND THAT IT MEETS THE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE SET FORTH BY THE BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS IN CHAPTER 5J-17.051, F.A.C, PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 472.027, FLORIDA STATUTES. 11. THE TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT SHOWN HEREON MAY HAVE EXTINGUISHED. 12. OWNERSHIP INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON WAS TAKEN FROM THE COLLIER COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER WEBSITE ON 11/4/2021. 13. NO ZONING REPORT WAS PROVIDED AT TIME OF SURVEY. 14. A REQUEST WAS MADE THROUGH SUNSHINE 811 TO HAVE UTILITIES MARKED. NO MARKINGS WERE OBSERVED AT THE TIME OF THE FIELD SURVEY. I I I ) FIR 1 /2" LB #642 0.31' W, 0.32' S / I s/ A/C CONC. AREA A6 1' LO ONE STORY BUILDING +/- 2,186 SQUARE FEET 4050 13TH AVE SW N, iGo eel / �s• l Y A9/lj� C- i GO��P P / J s w 0 U z 0 U rho FP DETAIL 1" = 10' PINE RIDGE RD 0 mm 11TH AVE SW w J 0 U 13TH AVE SW SITE 15TH AVE SW GREEN BLVD -N- 17TH AVE SW II VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE SCHEDULE B-II EXCEPTIONS PER OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, WITH A FILE NUMBER FH MALONEYPFBRO, HAVING AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF OCTOBER 17, 2021 AT 11:00 PM *ITEMS 1-4 & 13 NOTHING TO SHOW.* EXCEPTION #5 ALL MATTERS CONTAINED ON THE PLAT OF GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT NO. 26, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, PAGE 15, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. (AFFECTS SUBJECT PARCEL, SHOWN HEREON) EXCEPTION #6 COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, AND RESTRICTIONS RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 97, PAGE 492, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. (AFFECTS SUBJECT PARCEL, BLANKET /N NATURE, NOT SHOWN HEREON) EXCEPTION #7 RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 244, PAGE 948, RELEASE OF RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 1013, PAGE 231, O.R. BOOK 1059, PAGE 631, AND O.R. BOOK 1082, PAGE 326, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. (AFFECTS SUBJECT PARCEL, THE 7.5' PORTION NOT RELEASED BY THE RELEASE DOCUMENTS SHOWN HEREON) EXCEPTION 98 COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 251, PAGE 390, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. (AFFECTS SUBJECT PARCEL, BLANKET IN NATURE, NOT SHOWN HEREON) EXCEPTION #9 AERIAL EASEMENT RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 5452, PAGE 1700, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. (PARCEL 1) (AFFECTS SUBJECT PARCEL, SHOWN HEREON) EXCEPTION #10 EASEMENT RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 5452, PAGE 1704, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. (PARCEL 1) (AFFECTS SUBJECT PARCEL, SHOWN HEREON) EXCEPTION #11 EASEMENT RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 5452, PAGE 1708, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. (PARCEL 1) (AFFECTS SUBJECT PARCEL, SHOWN HEREON) EXCEPTION #12 RESOLUTION 2020-146 RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 5815, PAGE 1284, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. (AFFECTS SUBJECT PARCEL, BLANKET IN NATURE, NOT SHOWN HEREON) CERTIFIED TO: - 4050 13th AVE, LLC, A FLORIDA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY - WOOD, BUCKEL & CARMICHAEL, PLLC - ATTORNEY'S TITLE FUND SERVICES, LLC - OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP OR PLAT AND THE SURVEY ON WHICH IT IS BASED WERE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2021 MINIMUM STANDARD DETAIL REQUIREMENTS FOR ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEYS, JOINTLY ESTABLISHED AND ADOPTED BY ALTA AND NSPS, AND INCLUDES ITEMS 1. 2. 3. 4. 6(a (b). 7f� a)(bl), 8. 9. 11(b), 14, 19 AND 20 OF TABLE A THEREOF. THE FIELDWORK WAS COMPLETED ON NOVEMBER 8, 2021. DONALD L. SAINTENOY III P.S.M #6761, FOR THE FIRM DATE I Y 'lwo �^wmww,nu'�' ", R� �fi laFa3 _ g,}� 405013T" AVENUE SW GMPA ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION March 2022 The 4050 13 1h Avenue SW project is approximately 5.53 acres in size. This consists primarily of a 1.92 acre former home site and yard on the northern half of the site with 1.15 acres of fill area extending along the west side of the site. The remainder of the property consists of 1.93 acres of temperate hardwoods invaded by exotic vegetation and a small 0.14 acre area of cabbage palm also invaded by exotic vegetation. There are currently approximately 2.46 acres of native vegetation (as defined by Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) Section 3.05.07.A.1) on the property. This consists of Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System Codes 425E1, 425E2 and 428HE2 as shown on the attached Vegetation Map. A survey for listed species of wildlife known to inhabit similar vegetative communities in Collier County, and plant species listed in LDC Section 3.04.03 has been conducted. Two potentially active gopher tortoise burrow were observed. No other species of wildlife listed as endangered, threatened or species of special concern by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission or the United States Fish and Wildlife Service occur on the subject parcel. Please see the attached Protected Species Assessment for a discussion of the current site conditions and the results of the listed species survey. The as proposed project is consistent with Policy 6.1 of the Collier County Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) of the Growth Management Plan. Approximately 0.36 acres of native vegetation will be retained in the southeastern portion of the property. Parke Lewis of Dexbender prepared the Protected Species Assessment. Mr. Lewis has been employed as a full time environmental consultant in Southwest Florida since 1989. A copy of his credentials is attached. 4V PARKE LEWIS, BIOLOGIST Mr. Lewin has worked for over 28 years as an environmental consultant in Florida. His work -involves extensive environmental permitting, site analysis, and long ternii Monitoring ,and management of preserve areas_ Mr. Lewis is experienced in permitting and enforcement policies for wetlands, mangroves, and listed species at local, state, and federal levels. Fie is a qualified expert witness for the Lee County Hearing Examiner., Torn of Fort Myers Beach, Village of Estero, and Collier County. Education ■ Bachelor of Science, Mount. St. Marys College, 1988 Certifications • Florida Statewide (62-340 FACE Wetland Delineation Training Program,, 1996 Unified Mitigation Assessment Method Training - South Florida Water Management District, 2000 • Florida Hydric Soils Workshop - Florida Association of Professional Sail Classifiers, 1995 SECTION: 15 TOWNSHIP: 49 S RANGE: 26 E 4050 13th Avenue SW FLUCCS Description Acreage 110 Residential 1.92 ac. *425E1 Temperate Hardwoods Invaded by Exotics (10-25%) 1.93 ac. *425E2 Temperate Hardwoods Invaded by Exotics (26-50%) 0.39 ac. *428E2 Cabbage Palm Invaded by Exotics (26-50%) 0.14 ac. 744 1.15 ac. Total 5.53 ac. *Native Vegetation (2.46 ac.) Notes: 1. Property boundary is approximate and was obtained from a survey by GradyMinor. 2. Mapping based on photointerpretation of 2021 aerial photography and ground truthing in January 2022. 3. Delineation of site as consisting of uplands per FDEP 6/13/22. PERMIT USE ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION i 0 60 120 SCALE FEET August 23, 2022 2:31:46 p.m. Drawing: SHAMROCKI_PLAN.DWG Vegetation Ma DEXBENDFR p 9ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING FORT MYERS 239-334-3680 rl I At Aw . f . r44 ,. r � �perty�Bo�ndary_ • r Al - " '17 I r-A r — P a + I 0 2022 Microsoft Co pbrAon © 2022 Maxar ©CNES (2022) Dist ibution A' bus D �. .� SECTION: 15 TOWNSHIP: 49 S RANGE: 26 E 4050 13th Avenue SW T 13th Ave SW II I 1 I I I I (1.92 ac.) II I 1 I I N I 7" I TCA ` I(1.15 ac.) 0 r P �($28�IE2 I ac.) 425E1 I I (1.93 ac.) I I I I I I II I 1 FLUCCS Description 0 a 0 60 120 SCALE FEET Potentially Jurisdictional Wetlands (0.14 ac.) 110 Residential 425E1 Temperate Hardwoods Invaded by Exotics (10-25%) 425E2 Temperate Hardwoods Invaded by Exotics (26-50%) 428HE2 Hydric Cabbage Palm Invaded by Exotics (26-50%) 744 Fill Areas Total Notes: 1. Property boundary is approximate and was obtained from a survey by GradyMinor. 2. Mapping based on photointerpretation of 2021 aerial photography and ground truthing in January 2022. 3. Delineation of Jurisdictional wetlands is preliminary and subject to field review/approval by applicable regulatory agencies. Acreag e 1.92 ac. 1.93 ac. 0.39 ac. 0.14 ac. 1.15 ac. 5.53 ac. March 31. 2022 3:35:44 p.m. Pff"IT USE ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Drawing: SHAMROCKI—PLAN.DWG DFXBENDER Wetland MapEENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING FORT MYERS 239-334-3680 4050 13 Avenue SW Section 15, Township 49 South, Range 26 East Collier County, Florida Protected Species Assessment April 2022 Prepared for: Shamrock Homes 9800 Westpoint Drive, Ste 200 Indianapolis, IN 46256 Prepared by: DexBender 4470 Camino Real Way, Suite 101 Fort Myers, FL 33966 (239) 334-3680 INTRODUCTION The 5.53± acre project is located within a portion of Section 15, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. The parcel is bordered to the north by 13 Avenue SW and to the east by Collier Boulevard. An electrical power substation and single family homes are located to the south and west of the property. SITE CONDITIONS The northern half of this site consists of a single family model home site. The southern half of the site consists primarily of temperate hardwoods invaded by exotic vegetation. A fill area consisting of an old road bed extends along the length of the western side of the site. VEGETATIVE CLASSIFICATIONS The predominant vegetation associations were mapped in the field on 2021 digital 1" = 120' scale aerial photography. The property boundary was obtained from RWA Engineering and inserted into the digital aerial. The property boundary was staked in the field at the time of our site inspection. Five vegetation associations were identified using the Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCCS). Figure 1 depicts the approximate location and configuration of these vegetation associations and Table 1 summarizes the acreages by FLUCCS Code. A brief description of each FLUCCS Code is also provided below. Table 1. Acreage Summary by FLUCCS Code FLUCCS CODE DESCRIPTION ACREAGE 110 Residential 1.95 425E Temperate Hardwoods Invaded by Exotics (10-25%) 1.91 425HE2 Temperate Hardwoods Invaded by Exotics (26-50%) 0.39 428HE2 H dric Cabbage Palm Invaded by Exotics 26-50% 0.13 744 Fill Areas 1.16 TOTAL 5.53 FLUCCS Code 110, Residential FLUCCS Code 425 El, Temperate Hardwoods Invaded by Exotics ((10-25%) FLUCCS Code 425E2,Temperate Hardwoods Invaded by Exotics (26-50%) FLUCCS Code 428E2 Hydric Cabbage Palm Invaded by Exotics (26-50%) FLUCCS Code 744 Fill Areas SURVEY METHOD Based on the general habitat types (FLUCCS Codes) identified on -site and the property's location there is a very low potential for a limited number of species listed as endangered, threatened, or species of special concern by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) or the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) to potentially occur on the subject parcel. These species include gopher tortoise (Gopherus Polyphemus) which has been observed on site, eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon corais couperi), red -cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis), Big Cypress fox squirrel (Sciurus niger avicennia), Florida bonneted -bat (Eumops floridanus), and Florida panther (Felis concolor cory►). The bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), which has been delisted by the FWC and FWS, is still protected by other regulations and was therefore included in the survey. The Florida black bear (Ursus americanus floridanus), delisted in 2012, is still protected by the Florida Black Bear Management Plan and was also included in the survey. In addition, per Collier County regulations three species of orchids (Cyrtopodium punctatum, Encyclia cochleata, and E. tampensis) and four species of wild pine (Tillandsia fasciculata, T. utriculata, T. balbisiana, and T. flexuosa) which could potentially occur on -site were included in the survey. In order to comply with FWC/FWS survey methodology guidelines, each habitat type was surveyed for the occurrence of the species listed above using meandering pedestrian belt transects. Observations for listed species were made during a specific protected species survey event. The meandering pedestrian belt transects were spaced approximately 50 feet apart. The approximate location of direct sighting or sign (such as tracks, nests, and droppings) of a listed species, when observed, was denoted on the aerial photography. The 1 " = 100' scale aerial Protected Species Assessment map (Figure 1) depicts the approximate location of the survey transects and the results of the survey. The listed species survey was conducted during the mid -morning hours of April 04, 2022. The weather at the time of the survey was warm and sunny. Prior to conducting the protected species survey, a search of the FWC listed species database was conducted to determine the known occurrence of listed species in the project area. This search revealed no known protected species occurring on the site. The database indicated that Florida black bear have been recorded adjacent to the 2 property (Figure 2). The FWC's online Gopher Tortoise Permit Map was also reviewed. According to the website, no gopher tortoise permits have been issued for the subject property or immediately adjacent lands. 3 SURVEY RESULTS Florida Bonneted Bat No evidence of bat utilization (bat vocalization/chatter from within potential cavity trees or guano on or around the snags or within the structure on site) was observed. Collier County Plants No Collier County listed species of plants were observed on the site. Other Listed Species Two gopher tortoise burrows were observed on the property. The location of the gopher tortoise burrow is depicted on the attached Protected Species Assessment Map. No other species listed by either the FWS or the FWC were observed on the site during the protected species survey. In addition to the site inspection, a search of the FWC species database revealed no additional known protected species within the project limits. Y:SHAM ROCK-1-11PSA.docx 4 SECTION: 15 TOWNSHIP: 49 S 4050 13th Avenue SW RANGE: 26 E A 1 COLLIER COUNTY g-4 a ' - T— «a"a 1 Gdldii' 1 Gate Blvd W 3 Gdden Galeg(vdW CK: yes `Rzl—WR4oDl - W—N 4: .... lm—$- I 4x d. -r i._xndRWer [k y I"'*" ` s'" Pin0 Rd.,.. e R.'{J��e sl White Blvd Pm M.v. Wcrr....Wq S—Awa, m ;itn A�SA Y •in. A. SW 3 GapwvG3 Wr/ n lJ"'auaS wa, h•A- `� • _ . 1 V lxrreorer w_. Kr.Mrr Y.':r-j.W,� � C11 � 0 I:H`.!.•5W yli.A�.Sw Green Blvd' G;xrn ' •• 1i., sw0 M A glV6 Ce.e leX: u. 1 cw An. Shrj 17»A.s Sw 0 Nsa a: •I L _ xw•/b 3 A al�aM,w ' en Gate !a•➢c <w rj,4. F—„ k l- bet 6, r Golden Gate Pkwy f z WM, gld Project Location PERMIT USE ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION March 02. 2022 10.36:04 a.m. Drawing: SHAMROCK1—L0CA710N.DWG Location Map DEXBENDER ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING FORT MYERS 239-334-3680 4050 13th Avenue SW S Potentially Occupied Gopher Tortoise Burrow (2) FLUCCS Description Acreage 110 Residential 1.92 ac. 425E1 Temperate Hardwoods Invaded by Exotics (10-25%) 1.93 ac. 425E2 Temperate Hardwoods Invaded by Exotics (26-50%) 0.39 ac. *428HE2 Hydric Cabbage Palm Invaded by Exotics (26-50%) 0.14 ac. 7" Fill Areas 1.15 ac. Total 5.53 ac. *Potentially Jurisdictional Wetlands 0 60 120 SCALE FEET SECTION: 15 TOWNSHIP: 49 S RANGE: 26 E Notes: 1. Property boundary Is approximate and was obtained from a survey by GradyMinor. 2. Mapping based on photolnterpretation of 2021 aerial photography and ground truthing In January 2022. 3. Delineation of Jurisdictional wetlands Is preliminary and subject to field reviewlapproval by applicable regulatory agencies. 4. Gopher Tortoise burrow survey conducted on March 4, 2022. March 31. 2022 3: 35:44 p.m. PERMIT USE ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRIICTlON Drawing: sHaMRoac1—PLAN.DYNG Protected Species Assessment IDEXBENDER s p ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING FORT MYERS 239-334-3680 SECTION: 15 TOWNSHIP: 49 S RANGE: 26 E 4050 13th Avenue SW 7 I q 0 60 120 SCALE FEET FLUCCS Description 110 Residential 425E1 Temperate Hardwoods Invaded by Exotics (10-25%) 425E2 Temperate Hardwoods Invaded by Exotics (26-50%) *428HE2 Hydric Cabbage Palm Invaded by Exotics (26-50°%) 7" Fill Areas Total *Potentially Jurisdictional Wetlands Notes: 1. Property boundary Is approximate and was obtained from a survey by GradyMinor. 2. Mapping based on photointerpretation of 2021 aerial photography and ground truthing In January 2022. 3. Delineation of jurisdictional wetlands Is preliminary and subject to field review/approval by applicable regulatory agencies. PEWMIT USE ONLY, NOT Vegetation Map Acreage 1.92 ac. 1.93 ac. 0.39 ac. 0.14 ac. 1.15 ac. 5.53 ac. March 31. 2022 3: 35, 44 p.m. FOR CONSTRUCTION Drawing: SHAMRDCKI—PLAN.DWG EXB.ENDER E?,D- NVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING FORT MYERS 239-334-3680 CACT Count y COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www. co I l i e rco u n ty. gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS FOR PUD REZONE REQUEST APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name ofApplicant(s): SHAMROCK BUILDERS Address: 9800 WESTPOINT DR, SUITE 200 City: INDIANAPOLIS Telephone: Cell: E-Mail Address: GREG@SHAMROCKBUILDER.COM Address of Subject Property (If available): 4050 13 AVE SW City: Naples State: FL ZIP: 34116 r20PERTY INFORMATION Section/Township/Range: 1/ 4/26 Lot: N/A Block: N/A Subdivision: N/A State: I N Fax: Metes & Bounds Description: See attached Legal Description ZIP: 46256 Plat Book: 6051 page #: 386/391 property I.D. Number: 37931080007 and 37931120006 TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO BE PROVIDED Check applicable system: a. County Utility System 0 b. City Utility System ❑ C. Franchised Utility System ❑ Provide Name: d. Package Treatment Plant ❑ (GPD Capacity): e. Septic System ❑ I TYPE OF WATER SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED I Check applicable system: a. County Utility System x❑ b. City Utility System ❑ C. Franchised Utility System ❑ Provide Name: d. Private System (Well) ❑ Total Population to be Served: 1,550 self -storage units; 2 employees per 8-hour shift; 1,225 square -foot office Peak and Average Daily Demands: 1,524 gpd **See attached Utility Calculations A. Water -Peak: 1982 gpd Average Daily: 3.34 Ill 0.76gpm(1,089gpd) for demand breakdown. B. Sewer -Peak: gp Average Daily. If proposing to be connected to Collier County Regional Water System, please provide the date service is expected to be required: May 2023 March 4, 2020 Page 6 of 11 CACT Count y COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www. co I l i e rco u n ty. gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Narrative statement: Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and schematic drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the method of affluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation data and soil involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional engineer. THE PROPETY WILL REQUIRE MINIMAL SEWAGE TREATMENT AS A SELF STORAGE USE AS A RESULT, COLLIER COUNTY PUBLIC UTILITIES HAS SUFFICIENT CAPACITY TO HANDLE THE DEMAND. Collier County Utility Dedication Statement: If the project is located within the service boundaries of Collier County's utility service system, a notarized statement shall be provided agreeing to dedicate the water distribution and sewage collection facilities within the project area to the Collier County Utilities. This shall occur upon completion of the construction of these facilities in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at that time. This statement shall also include an agreement that the applicable system development charges and connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. If applicable, the statement shall contain an agreement to dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer systems. Acknowledged. Statement of Availability Capacity from other Providers: Unless waived or otherwise provided for at the pre -application meeting, if the project is to receive sewer or potable water services from any provider other than the County, a statement from that provider indicating adequate capacity to serve the project shall be provided. March 4, 2020 Page 7 of 11 ENGINEERING EXHIBIT D 4050 13th Ave Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) LEGAL DESCRIPTION* PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: PARCEL 1: TRACT 119, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT NO. 26, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, PAGE 15, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPT THE EAST 35 FEET AS DESCRIBED IN ORDER OF TAKING RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 4963, PAGE 2748, AND LESS AND EXCEPT THE WEST 260 FEET. PARCEL 2: TRACT 120, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT NO. 26, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, PAGE 15, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPT THE EAST 35 FEET AS DESCRIBED IN ORDER OF TAKING RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 4963, PAGE 2748. AND LESS AND EXCEPT THE WEST 260 FEET. CONTAINING 5.53 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. *Taken from Alta Survey Conducted By GradyMinor certified on 11/17/2021 - Plat Book 7, Pg 15 Page 1 of 1 -...RWA-"-- ENGINEERING 4050 13th Avenue SW Potable Water Demand Project 4050 13th Avenue SW Proj. #: 210069.02.01 Calculated By: SCF Checked By: Task # 10 Date: 07/07/22 Date: Use Factor Quantity Rate a Average Daily Flow Peak Daily Peak Daily Flow Peak Daily Flow Peak Hourly Peak Hourly Peak Hourly (gpd) I (gpd) I Factor (gpc I (gpm) I Factorb Flow (gpd) I Flow (gpm) Warehouse Self -storage, per unit (up to 200) Unit 200 1.4 280 1.30 364 0.25 4.40 1,231 0.90 Add per unit above 200 Unit 1,350 0.7 945 1.30 1,229 0.85 4.40 4,153 2.90 Add per employee per 8 hour shift Employee 2 21 42 1.30 55 0.04 4.40 185 0.10 Office Square feet SF 1,225 0.21 257 1.30 334 0.23 4.40 1,131 0.80 TOTAL 1,524 1,982 1.38 4.40 6,699 4.70 Footnotes: a) Rate demand from FAC 64E-6.008 multiplied by 1.4 as per Collier County Utilities Design Criteria b) Peak Hourly Factor = (18+ ((Average Daily Demand/100 gpdpc)/1000)A.5)/(4+((Average Daily Demand/100 gpdpc)/1000)A.5) (from Recommended Standards for Wastewater Facility, 2014 Edition) K:\2021\210069.02.01 4050 13th Avenue SW - CPA, PUD, ERP, SDP\0010 Civil Eng Design, Const Plans and TS\Ca1cs\Water\2022-l0-12 Potable Demand 10/ 12/2022 JRWAIN-- ENGINEERING Project Proj. #: Calculated By: Checked By: 4050 13th Avenue SW Sanitary Sewer Calculations 4050 13th Avenue SW 210069.02.01 Task # 10 SCF Date: 7/7/2022 Date: Rate; Average Daily Average Daily Peak Hourly Peak Hourly Peak Hourly Use Unit Quantity (gpd) Flow (gpd) Flow (gpm) Factor I Flow (gpd) Flow(gpm)` Warehouse Self -storage, per unit (up to 200) Unit 200 1 200 0.14 4.41 882 0.61 Add per unit above 200 Unit 1350 0.5 675 0.47 4.41 2,977 2.07 Add per employee per 8 hour shift Employee 2 15 30 0.02 4.41 132 0.09 Office Square feet SF 1,225 0.15 184 0.13 4.41 811 0.56 TOTAL 1,089 0.76 4.41 4,802 3.34 Footnotes: a) Rate demands from State of Florida Department of Health Chapter 64E-6, Section 64E-6.008 System Size Determinations b) Peak Hourly Factor = (18+ ((Average Daily Demand/100 gpdpc)/1000)^.5)/(4+((Average Daily Demand/100 gpdpc)/1000)^.5) (from Recommended Standards for Wastewater Facility, 2014 Edition) c) Assumes 24 hour duration K:\2021\210069.02.014050 13th Avenue SW - CPA, PUD, ERP, SDP\0010 Civil Eng Design, Const Plans and TS\Calcs\Sanitary\2022-05-16 Sanitary Demand 7/7/2022 Sewer Demand 10:20 AM DocuSign Envelope ID: 60F89C3B-A852-4B30-9C38-7790EOCE3FO7 JMB TRANSPORTATI13N ENGINEERING, INC. TRAFFIC/TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING & PLANNING SERVICES TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT 4050 131h Avenue SW Commercial Infill Subdistrict (Collier County, Florida) March 29, 2022 Revised August 23, 2022 County TIS Review Fees TIS Methodology Review Fee = $500.00 TIS (Small -Scale Study) Review Fee = $0.00 Prepared by: JMB TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, INC. 4711 7TH AVENUE SW NAPLES, FLORIDA 341 1 9 CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION NO. 27830 (JMB PROJECT NO. 22021 1 ) DAMES FLORI C DocuSigned by: ll m Bald -al of l l I fill Et1gD679D23E47F... rjp,j ��~ "gyp Z2 ... •. • X c ,��llllil1t111 DocuSign Envelope ID: 60F89C3B-A852-4B30-9C38-7790EOCE3FO7 TABLE OF CONTENTS Conclusions 2 Scope of Project 3 Table A - Proposed Land Use 3 Figure 1 - Location Map 3.1 Master Concept Plan — Preferred Option 3.2 Master Concept Plan — Option 2 3.3 Project Generated Traffic 4 Table B - Net New Site -Generated Trips 4 Table 1 - Trip Generation Computations 41 Existing + Committed Road Network 5 Project Traffic Distribution S Area of Significant Impact 5 Figure 2 - Project Traffic Distribution 5.1 Table 2 - Area of Impact/Road Classification 5.2 2021 thru 2027 Project Build -out Traffic Conditions 6 Table 3 - 2021 & 2027 Link Volumes 6.1 Table 4 - 2027 Link Volumes/Capacity Analysis 6.2 Appendix 7 t DocuSign Envelope ID: 60F89C3B-A852-4B30-9C38-7790EOCE3F07 Conclusions Based upon the findings of this report, it was determined that the proposed 4050 13' Avenue SW Commercial Infill Subdistrict will not have a significant or negative impact upon the surrounding road network. It was verified that all roadways, within the project's area of influence, currently have a surplus of capacity and can accommodate the traffic associated with the proposed indoor self -storage warehouse. As determined, the road network will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service for the foreseeable future and the project will not create any off -site transportation deficiencies that need to be mitigated. Although the project does not significantly impact any roads or cause any roads to operate below the adopted LOS standard, the Developer will be required to pay for its portion of "consumed" capacity via payment of road impact fees. As set forth by Collier County's Impact Fee Ordinance, the fees are a pro rata assessment towards the funding of area -wide transportation improvements to support new growth. The amount of road impact fees paid per type of land use are determined via a "consumption -based impact fee approach", in which new development is charged based upon the proportion of vehicle - miles of travel (VMT) that each unit of new development is expected to consume of a lane mile of roadway network. The cost of consumed lane mile is based upon current roadway construction costs within Collier County. Therefore, the payment of road impact fees is the project's pro rata share of funding transportation improvements that are deemed necessary to support the demands generated by new growth. Methodology On March 14, 2022, a Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) Methodology Report was submitted to the office of Collier County Transportation Planning Department- The $500.00 methodology meeting fee will be paid at the time of submitting the land use entitlement application. The TIS methodology was reviewed by staff and a copy of the approved methodology is provided in the appendix (refer to pages M 1 thru M10). Revisions after the TIS methodology, 1. The MCP plan has been revised to reflect a preferred means of ingress/egress to the site via a right-in/out access to C.R. 951. N DocuSign Envelope ID: 60F89C3B-A852-4B30-9C38-7790EOCE3F07 Scope of Project 4050 13t'' Avenue SW Commercial Infill Subdistrict is a proposed indoor self -storage warehouse (SIC code 4225) development that will consist of no more than 174,000 square feet of indoor storage space. The site is located southwest corner of 13t' Avenue SW and Collier Boulevard, within Collier County, Florida. The Applicant is proposing to have only one (1) means of ingress/egress via a right-in/out access on Collier Boulevard, which is referred to the preferred option (refer to page 3.2). Alternatively, and if directed by the Collier County BCC, the site will have only one (1) access on 13th Avenue SW, which is referred to as Option 2 (refer to page 3.3). Table A Proposed Land Use Proposed Land Use Size Mini-Warehousing/Storage (SIC code 4225) 174,000 s.f. 3 DocuSign Envelope ID: 60F89C3B-A852-4B30-9C38-7790EOCE3FO7 v w 0 m a rn J O a m 0 v 0 m C Yi. Vanderbilt Beath Rd I I I I I NORTH N.F.S. IGolden Gate Boulevard m m ai a m m Q! i d fl 75 3 i i i Pine Ridge Road I White Boulevard --------------------- 1 1 th Ave SW I i 13th Ave SW 15th Ave SW ' Green Boulevard o i m 7 0 m c i i Golden Gate Parkway i I // 4050 13th Ave SW CPUD May 31, 2022 FUNDED IMPROVEMENT s S-LANE ARTERIAL �r 4-LANE ARTERIAI./COLLECTOR ----- 2-LANE ARTERIAL 2—LANE COLLECTOR/LOCAL RAIL ROAD %MTRAN9F9C]RTATImN ENmNEERING, INC. Project Location & Roadway Classification I FIGURE 1 I ---�————— — — -- — --..--- PROPOSED CURRENT USE: COUNTY RIGHT-OF-WAY, SF RESIDENTIAL BEYOND RIGHT TURN LANE ZONING DISTRICT; ESTATES - �� FPL GUY WIRE EX. S' TEMPORARY UTILITY PROPOSED ROW COT45TRLJCTION E5MT EASEMENT COMPENSATION (ASSUMED EXPIREO) BUS STOP ITH N J F BENCH AND BIKE RACK 11 I I 7.5' ROW EASEMENT II (OR 244, PG 948) I I �\ (OR 1082, PG 326}, O W I ICI I MIN.E0 SETBACK LLI �� I I I;I I \ ra I I I J I STABIuzEOGRAVEL g W SHOULDER FORBUS 570P I Q 30' FPL 50' FPL di U I ESMT EASEMENT I W J 0 R 545Z, (OR 5452, 06 Z F I PG 1700) , PG 1706) � I 13j I LU 60' ROADWAY I' I O EASEMENT I wZ I /11,SIDEWALK Z O 5IDWPM 2' TYPE"' J BUFFER I ILI III M 10' TYPE"A" T5' ROW BUFFER EASEMENT (TO BE VACATED) (OR 244. PG 948) (OR 1082, PG 326) LEGEND — PROPERTY BOUNDARY PROJECT INGRESSIEGRESS Q - DEVIATION LOCATIONS W!M - WATER MANAGEMENT P - PRESERVE 0 C - COMMERCIAL TRACT 0 p « .PRESERVE'IX37 AC. - « • - -PARKING - - « 6'LDSCPAREATO GAKI SATISFY TYPE "0" _ «I ,r y LANDSCAPE BUFFER I I 21' MIN. SETBACK PROPERTY CURRENT USE: FPL SUBSTATION BOUNDARY ZONING DISTRICT: ESTATES (E) A 9 R Z. D s� df ma - W Fa w� vw W F V j O Lu C'} Z J Z z O u p a LL N o 3 W ca 25' M{N. SETBACK o z 1C' TYPE "A" i a BUFFER W = cc C 7.5' ROW EASEMENT (TO BE VACATED) (OR 244, PG 948) (OR 1082, PG 326) I ` 4 COLLIER BLVD I& FPLGUYWIRE UTILITY EASEMENT (OR 5452, PG 1704) rBUS STOP WITH BENCH AND BIKE RACK MIN. 80' SETBACK Lu J 30' FPI- I U 95 J ESMT Oa- a OR LU 5452, Z LU W I PG 3 7001 - 50' FPL a 4 EASEMENT I D �-+ {OR 5452, ; WPG 1705) ar LU WIM 50'ROADWAY J 1-- EASEMENT - STABIL EL W SHOULIOER ORBUS STOP � 7.5' ROW 25' TYPE`n° EASEMENT BUFFER Z (OR 244, PG ^� 948) PARKII ra W (OR 1082, PG 326) I I z° { IllN I 177tT IIr VI Lu I C C r 10TYPE 'All BUFFER CURRENT USE: COUNTY RIGHT-OF-WAY, SF RESIDENTIAL BEYOND ZONING DISTRICT: ESTATES 2S TYPE"D" BUFFER LEGEND — PROPERTY BOUNDARY PROJECT INGRESSJEGRESS - DEVIATION LOCATIONS WIM - WATER MANAGEMENT P PRESERVE 0 C COMMERCIAL TRACT «•.--«.�. «•,� •.«.•..`.*PRESERVE, « 6'LDSCPAREA TO- + « + SATISFY TYPE°D• - • • Q ' LANDSCAPE BUFFER ' UJ W H W� > C L z I 20' MIN. N SETBACK Lu 10 TYPE A Z BUFFER a - •I \ 7.5' ROW EASEMENT TE \ ((O BE VACATED) (OR 244, PG 9481 {OR 1082, PG 326} 20' MIN. 7,5' ROW CURRENT USE: FPL SUBSTATION SETBACK EASEMENT (TO BE VACATED) ZONING DISTRICT: ESTATES (E) -PROPERTY BOUNDARY (OR 244, PG 948) (OR 1087. PG 326) CA vi DocuSign Envelope ID: 60F89C3B-A852-4B30-9C38-7790EOCE3FO7 Project Generated Traffic Traffic that can be expected to be generated by the project was estimated based upon the guidelines established by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Manual, 11 t' Edition. That is, historical traffic data collected at similar land uses was relied upon in estimating the project's traffic. It was concluded that land use code Mini - Warehouse (LUC 151) was most appropriate in estimating the new trips. Table 1 depicts the computations performed in determining the total new trips. Table B provides a summary of the trip generation computation results that are shown in Table 1. Table S Site -Generated Trips (Summation of Table 1) Daily Weekday AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Use Trips Generated Trips Generated Trips Generated ADT h v h Mini -Warehousing 252 16 26 (174, 000 sf.) The report concludes that the project will generate less than 50 net new trip ends during the weekday highest peak hour. As such, the report investigates the traffic impacts associated with the project based upon the criteria set forth by the Collier County Government's Traffic Impact Statement Guidelines for developments generating "less than 50 trips", which is defined as a small-scale study. 4 DocuSign Envelope ID: 60F89C3B-A852-4B30-9C38-7790EOCE3FO7 TABLE 1 TRIP GENERATION COMPUTATIONS 405013th Avenue SW Commercial Infill Subdistrict Land Use Code Land Use Description 151 Mini-Warehouse^� Land Use Code Trip Period LUC 151 Daily Traffic (ADT) _ AM Peak Hour (vph) = 7-9 AM PM Peak Hour (vph) = 4-6 PM Build Schedule 174,000 s.f. Trip Generation Equation (Based upon 5.F.1 T = 1.45(X) = T = 0.09(X) = 59% Enter/ 41% Exit = T = 0.15(X) = 47% Enter/ 53% Exit = Total Trips Trips Enter/Exit 252 ADT 16 vph 9 / 6 vph 26 vph 12 / 14 vph 4.1 DocuSign Envelope ID: 60F89C3B-A852-4B30-9C38-7790EOCE3FO7 Existing + Committed Road Network Figure 1 and Table 2 provide a detail of the surrounding E + C roadways. Table 2 also depicts the nearby roadways respective minimum level of service performance standards and capacity. Collier Boulevard varies between a four -lane and a six -lane divided arterial. The road functions as a primary north/south corridor that extends between Immokalee Road and Marco Island. Within proximity of the site, the road is six -lanes and has a posted speed limit of 45 MPH. Collier Boulevard between Green Boulevard and City Gate Drive is four -lanes but is funded on Collier County's 5-year CIP to be widened to six -lanes. 13`h Avenue SW is a two-lane dead-end street that extends east/west for a distance of about one -mile between its western terminus and its eastern intersection with Collier Boulevard. 13'h Avenue SW has a posted speed limit of 30 MPH. Project Traffic Distribution The project's traffic was distributed to the surrounding roadway network based upon logical means of ingress/egress; current and future traffic patterns in the area; location of surrounding businesses, competing businesses and residential areas. Figure 2 and Table 2 provide a detail of the traffic distributions based on a percentage of trips generated. Table 2 also depicts the traffic assignments to nearby links. Area of Significant Impact The area of significant impact was determined based upon Collier County's 2%, 2% and 3% criteria (i.e., if the project's traffic is 2% or more of a roadrway's adopted level of service capacity, then the project has a significant impact upon that link). Table 2 describes the project traffic distributions and the level of impact on the surrounding roadways. Roads that were identified as being within the project's area of impact are shown in Table 2. 61 DocuSign Envelope ID: 60F89C3B-A852-4B30-9C38-7790EOCE3FO7 0 0 0 c U) cQ m m TABLE 2 CD PROJECT'S AREA OF IMPACT O n M W Project Traffic Peak Direction (vphpd) = 14 Exiting 00 D Project Traffic Non -Peak Direction (vph) = 12 Entering cco Golden Gate Blvd 17.0 C.R. 951 to Wilson Blvd Golden Gate Pkwy 22.0 Santa Barbara to Collier Blvd County Road 951 30.2 Vanderbilt to Golden Gate Blvd 31.1 Golden Gate Blvdto Pine Ridge 31.2.a Pine Ridge to 13tt Ave SW N 31.2.b 13th Ave SW to Green Blvd (See Note 1) 32.1 Green Blvd to Golden Gate Pkwy (See Note 1) 32.2 Golden Gate Pkwy to G.G. Canal 32.3 G.G. Main Canal to 1-75 Green Boulevard G.R. 951 to Santa Barbara N A W W O LOS Service Project Project 0 PK Dir. PK Direction Project Pk Hr Project Pk Hr Project Road Serv. Vol. Volume Traffic PK Dir Pk Hr Non-PK Dir Non -Pk Impact Percent SignifiE.4t Class LOS (vphod) % Dist. v{v hpd) Pk Dir (vph) DiR Standard Impact Impac o 4D D 2300 15% 2 E 2 w 3% 0.09% NO 0 rn 4D D 1980 25% 4 W 3 E 2% 0.18% n O NO " 6D E 3000 15% 2 N 2 S 3% 0.07% NO 6D D 3000 30% 4 N 4 S 3% 0.14% NO 6D D 3000 60% 8 N 7 S 2% 0.28% NO 6D D 3000 40% 6 N 5 S 2% 0.19% NO SD D 3000 35% 5 S 4 N 2% 0.16% NO 6D D 3000 10% 1 S 1 N 2% 0.05% NO 8D E 3600 10% 1 S 1 N 2% 0.04% NO 2U D 900 5% 1 w 1 E 2% 0.08% NO Footnote 1. Collier Blvd 6-lane construction funded on Collier County's 5-year CIP DocuSign Envelope ID: 60F89C3B-A852-4B30-9C38-7790EOCE3FO7 2021 thru 2027 Project Build -out Traffic Conditions In order to establish 2021 thru 2027 project build -out traffic conditions, two forecasting methods were used. The first traffic forecasting method was the County's traffic count data was adjusted for peak season conditions, peak hour conditions, peak direction, and an annual growth rate was then applied. The peak season/peak hour/peak direction factor and annual growth rate were obtained from the 2021 Collier County AUIR Report. Using the annual growth rate, the 2027 background traffic conditions were determined, which are depicted in Table 3. The second traffic forecasting method was to add the vested trips (trip bank) identified in the 2021 AUIR report to the adjusted peak season, peak hour and peak direction traffic counts. The 2027 vested trips 'Y' background traffic volumes are depicted in Table 3. The greater of the two values produced by the two forecasting procedures was then considered to reflect the 2027 background traffic. The net new project generated traffic was then added to the background traffic. Table 4 provides a summary of the 2021 thru 2027 traffic conditions and the roadways' level of service and remaining available capacity for project build -out conditions. As shown, all project impacted roadways will continue to operate at the County's adopted minimum level of service at project build -out. County Road 951 F TABLE 3 2021 & 2027 ROADWAY LINK VOLUMES Per Vested Trips Methc Per Growth Rate Method 2027 2027 Peak Hour 2021 Growth Peak Hour PK Direction AUIR AU)R Rate PK Direction Trip Background Traffic Pk per Background Bank Per Vested Trips (vphpd) DiR AU)R vt Rhpd) (Vphpd) v{ phDdl 31.2.a Pine Ridge to 13th Ave SW 2340 N 2.00% 2635 161 2491 31.2.b 13th Ave SW to Green Blvd 2340 N 2.00% 2635 151 2491 32.1 Green Blvd to Golden Gate Pkwvy 1420 N 2.00% 1599 49 1469 32.2 Golden Gate Pkwy to G.G. Canal 1800 N 2.00°% 2027 241 2041 32.3 G.G. Main Canal to I-75 1800 N 2.00% 2027 318 2118 0 0 0 c Cn cQ m m 0 TABLE 4 2027 ROADWAY LINK VOLUMEICAPACITY ANALYSIS 2021 Peak Hour PK Direction v! ahndi LOS County Road 951 31.2.a Pine Ridge to 13th Ave SW 2340 D 31.2.b 13th Ave SW to Green Blvd 2340 D (See Note 1) 32.1 Green Blvd to Golden Gate Pk 1420 C (See Note 1) 32.2 Golden Gate Pkwy to G.G. Ca 1800 D 32.3 G.G. Main Canal to 1-75 1800 C Footnote 1. Collier Blvd 6-lane construction funded on Collier County's 6-year CIP n io 2027 2027 Peak Hour Peak Hour PK Direction Bkgd PK Direction Background Pk Background (vphpd) Dir LDS 2635 N D 2635 N D 1599 N C 2041 N D 2118 N C Project Project Pk Hr Prjct Pk Hr Prjct PK Dir Pk Non-PK Dir Non -Pk V( Phpd) Dir NO) k 8 N 7 S 6 N 5 S 5 S 4 N 1 S 1 N 1 S 1 N 2027 Build -Out Peak Hour PK Dir Y( phpd) 2644 2641 1603 2042 2119 0 0 0 c Cn cQ m CD 0 CD 0 0 n co W 2027 2027 C Serv. Vol. Build -Out Build-Oui 4' Pk Hr Peak Hour Peak Hou CO PK Dir PK Direction PK Directic P (vl2hpd v!c Ratio LO$ 3000 0.88 D 3000 0.68 D 0 m 3000 0.53 C n 3000 0.68 D w 3600 0.59 'n C 0 DocuSign Envelope ID: 60F89C3B-A852-4B30-9C38-7790EOCE3FO7 Appendix DocuSim Envelope ID: 60F89C3B-A852-4B30-9C38-7790EOCE3FO7 JMB TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, INC. TRAFFIC/TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING & PLANNING SERVICES TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT METHODOLOGY REPORT 4050 13tn Avenue SW CPUD (Collier County, Florida) March 14, 2022 Countv TIS Review Fees TIS Methodology Review Fee = $500.00 TIS (Small -Scale Study) Review Fee = $0.00 Prepared by: JMB TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, INC. 471 1 7TH AVENUE SW NAPLES, FLORIDA 341 1 9 CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION NO. 2763C WMB PROJECT No. 22021 11 „��{11411iYdiD�89j9 Avo 3660 VCA 8.41�IK ` ,P: Fi U A �•fl / _J E Y M 1, DocuSign Envelope ID: 60F89C3B-A852-4B30-9C38-7790EOCE3F07 APPENDIX A INITIAL MEETING CHECKLIST Suggestion: Use this Appendix as a worksheet to ensure that no important elements are overlooked. Cross out the items that do not apply. Date:3-14-2022 Time: Location.: Collier Cogpty Government Offices (North Horseshoe Drive People Attending: Name, Organization, and Telephone Numbers 1) James M. Banks, JMB Transportation Engineering, Inc., 239-919-2767 2) Michael Sawyer, Collier County Government 3) Study Preparers Preparer's Name and Title: James M Banks P.E. President Organization: JMB Transportation Engineering,Inc. Address & Telephone Number: 4711 7th Avenue SW Naples, Florida_34119 (239), 2767 Reviewer(s): Reviewer's Name & Title: Michael Sawyer Collier County Transportation Division Applicant• Applicant's Name: Address: Telephone Number: Proposed Development: Name: 4050 13th Ave SW CPUD Location: Southwest quadrant of 13th Ave SW & Collier Blvd Land Use Type: 168 856 s.f. self -storage ITE Code #: LUC 151 Proposed number of development units: Self -Storage 168,856 s.f. Other: Description: Zoning: Existing: Comprehensive plan recommendation: Requested: Findings of the Preliminary Study: See the attached G:lusersynrksW 0esxiaplGOLLfEr7�224�7 i 131h Stre®t Setl SIo apaWfethOdolagyReport.tloc 1 — l 2+ DocuSign Envelope ID: 60F89C3B-A852-4B30-9C38-7790EOCE3F07 Study Type: Major TIS Study Area: Boundaries: Based upon the Coun 's 2% 2% & 3% impact rule. See attached Additional intersections to be analyzed: None Horizon Year(s): 2025 Analysis Time Period(s): PM Peak Future Off -Site Developments. None Source of Trip Generation Rates: ITE Trip Generation Manual 1 lth Edition Table 1 Reductions in Trip Generation Rates: Pass -by trips: None Internal trips (PUD): Transmit use: Other: Horizon Year Roadway Network Improvements: 2026 per Collier County's 5-year CIE. Methodology & Assumptions: Non -site traffic estimates: See Attached Site -trip generation: See Table 1 Trip distribution method: BasedMon on manual assignment See Figure 2 and Table 2 Traffic assignment method: Based upon manual. assignment Traffic growth rate: Per Collier County historical & current AUIR Reports but not less than 2% or background or vested trips method whichever is greater. NOTE: C.lusersymLsovl0esktoptiC4LLfER12202 i 113ih Street Se1F Slareg�IMethbdningyReport.dx M-5 DocuSign Envelope ID: 60F89C3B-A852-4B30-9C38-7790EOCE3F07 Special Features_(from preliminary study or prior experience) Accidents locations: Sight distance: Queuing: Access location & configuration: Traffic control: Signal system location & progression needs: On -site parking needs: Data Sources: Base maps: Prior study reports: Access policy and jurisdiction: Review process: Requirements: Miscellaneous: Small Scale Study — No Fee X Minor Study - $750,00 Major Study - $1500.00 Includes 2 intersections Additional Intersections - $500.00 each None All fees will be agreed to during the Methodology meeting and must he paid to Transportation prior to our sign -off on the application. Reviewers Applicant C:4Usersljm6svhDeskfupiGOLLfER12202f f 7Jth SYreef SelfSforagB"elhod0feggRepprt.doc MA- DocuSign Envelope ID: 60F89C3B-A852-4B30-9C38-7790EOCE3FO7 rr w 00 m 0 a J v 11 th Ave SW ' I 13th Ave SW 15th Ave_ SW I Green Boulevard Vanderbilt Beath Rd NORTH N.F.S. Golden Gate Boulevard ------------------- White Boulevard i a l m m l c � l c l � l Golden Gate Parkway � -----------1 LEGEND l 6-LANE ARTERIAL i �r 4-LANE ARTERIAL./COLLECTOR --- // i 2-LANE ARTERIAL 2—LANE COLLECTOR/LOCAL / l RAIL ROAD *- — — / E %MTRAN9PETRTATIr7iN ENGINEERING, INC. 4050 1 3th Ave 5W CPUD Project Location & Roadway Classification FIGURE 1 March 74, 2a22 M 5 DocuSign Envelope ID: 60F89C3B-A852-4B30-9C38-7790EOCE3F07 Land Use Code Land Use Description 151 Mini -Warehouse Land Use Code Trip Period LUC 151 Daily Traffic (ADT) _ AM Peak Hour (vph) _ 7-9 AM PM Peak Hour (vph) _ 4-6 PM TABLE 1 TRIP GENERATION COMPUTATIONS 405013th Avenue SW CPUD Build Schedule 168,856 s.f. Trip Generation Equation (Based upon S.F.) T = 1.45(X) _ T = 0.09(X) _ 59% Enter/ 41% Exit = T = 0.15(X) 47% Enter/ 53% Exit = Total Trips Trips Enter/Exit 245 ADT 15 vph 9 / 6 vph 25 vph 12 / 13 vph 'r-Ato DocuSign Envelope ID: 60F89C3B-A852-4B30-9C38-7790EOCE3FO7 I U yC N 0 0 m a n 0 cn I I -o 6 0 m `m o i U -- v a IN r�7 o m I L I I I 2f Pine Ridge Road -� I ---------------------- O 11 th Ave SW cn 13th Ave SW I 15th Ave SW I Green Boulevard 5� % ` I I p � I I m I L IOM1 C I 3 ul I 2d — Golden Gate Parkway /Ole I / I ' O I / I Vanderbilt Beach Rd NORTH N.7S. 11 Golden Gate Boulevard ------------------- 10% White Boulevard LEGEND 0()% PROJECT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION BY PERCENT %M'URANSPORTATICN ENSINEERIN©, INC. 4050 13th Ave SW CPUD Project -Generated FIGURE 2 March 14, 2022 Traffic Distribution l`,'17 0 0 c Cn cQ m m TABLE 2 PROJECT'S AREA OF IMPACT O n co w Project Traffic Peak Direction (vphpd) = 13 Exiting Project Traffic Non -Peak Direction (vph) = 12 Entering co nU'i W w 0 LDS Service Project Project co 0 PK Dir. PK Direction Project Pk Hr Project Pk Hr Project O 4 Road Serv. Vol. Volume Traffic PK Dir Pk Hr Non-PK Dir Non -Pk Impact Percent Significa o Class LOS vj phpd) % Dist. of phpd) Pk Dir (vph) DiR Standard Impact Im act C) Golden Gate Blvd 17.0 C.R. 951 to Wilson Blvd 4D D 2300 15% 2 E 2 W 3% 0.08% NO w n O Golden Gate Pkwy 22.0 Santa Barbara to Collier Blvd 4D D 1980 25% 3 W 3 E 2% 0.16% V NO County Road 951 30.2 Vanderbilt to Goiden Gate Blvd 6❑ E 3000 15% 2 N 2 S 3% 0.07% NO 31.1 Golden Gate Blvd to Pine Ridge 6D D 3000 30% 4 N 4 S 3% 0.13% NO 31.2.a 31.2.b Pine Ridge to 13th Ave SW 13th Ave SW to Green Blvd 6D 6D D D 3000 3000 60% 40% 8 5 N N 7 5 S S 2% 2% 0.26% 0.17% NO NO j 32.1 Green Blvd to Golden Gate Pkwy 6D D 3000 35% 5 S 4 N 2% 0.15% NO 32.2 Golden Gate Pkwy to G.G. Canal 6D D 3000 10% 1 S 1 N 2% 0.04% NO 32.3 G.G. Main Canal to 1-75 8D E 3600 10% 1 S 1 N 2% 0.04% NO Green Boulevard C.R. 951 to Santa Barbara 2U D 900 5% 1 W 1 E 2% 0.07% NO County Road 951 TABLE 3 2021 & 2025 ROADWAY LINK VOLUMES Per Vested Trips Methc Per Growth Rate Method 2025 2025 Peak Hour 2021 Growth Peak Hour PK Direction AUIR AUIR Rate PK Direction Trip Background Traffic Pk per Background Bank Per Vested Trips of phpd) DiR AUIR yf_phpd) v[ phpo) vPhp) 31.2.a Pine Ridge to 13th Ave SW 2340 N 2.00% 2533 151 2491 31.2.b 13th Ave SW to Green Blvd 2340 N 2.00% 2533 151 2491 32.1 Green Blvd to Golden Gate Pkwy 1420 N 2.00% 1537 49 1469 32.2 Golden Gate Pkwy to G.G. Canal 1800 N 2.00% 1948 241 2041 32.3 G.G. Main Canal to 1-75 1800 N 2.00% 1948 318 2118 0 0 0 c Cn cQ m m 0 County Road 951 31.2.a Pine Ridge to 13th Ave SW 31.2.b 13th Ave SW to Green Blvd 32.1 Green Blvd to Golden Gate Pk 32.2 Golden Gate Pkwy to G.G. Ca 32.3 G.G. Main Canal to 1-75 1K r 0 0 0 c Cn cQ m m TABLE 4 2025 ROADWAY LINK VOLUMEXAPACITY ANALYSIS 0 n co w D 2025 2025 2026 2025 2025 cwn 2021 Peak Hour Peak Hour Project Project Build -Out Serv. Vol. Build -Out N Build -Out ip Peak Hour PK Direction Bkgd PK Direction Pk Hr Prjct Pk Hr Prjct Peak Hour Pk Hr Peak Hour Peak Hou o PK Direction Background Pk Background PK Dir Pk Non-PK Dir Non -Pk PK Dir PK Dir PK Direction PK Directic C) v h d LOS v h d Dir LOS (v hnd) Dir fvphl fir {vghpd) y{ ON) vlc Ratio w LOS �O 2340 D 2533 N D 8 N 7 S 2541 3000 0.85 D 2340 D 2533 N D 5 N 5 S 2538 3000 0.85 D m 1420 C 1537 N C 5 8 4 N 1541 3000 0.51 C 0 m 1800 D 2041 N D 1 S 1 N 2D42 3000 D.68 D n 1800 C 2118 N C 1 S 1 N 2119 3600 0.59 C 4 ENGINEERING EXHIBIT A 4050 13th Ave Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) LIST OF PERMITTED USES A maximum of 174,000 square feet of gross commercial floor area shall be permitted in this PUD. PERMITTED USES: Tract C — Commercial: A. Principal Use(s): 1. Mini and Self- Storage (SIC 4225) B. Accessory Uses: 1. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to walls, berms and fences. 2. Gates, gatehouse, and access control structures. 3. Stormwater management treatment, conveyance facilities and structures. Tract P — Preserve A. Principal Use: 1. Preserve B. Accessory Uses 1. Mitigation for environmental permitting. 2. Water management as allowed by the LDC. 4050 13th Ave SW CPUD PUDZ-PL 20210003321 March 20, 2023 Page 1 of 10 ENGINEERING EXHIBIT B 4050 13th Ave Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) LIST OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The standards for land uses within the development shall be as stated in these development standard tables. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or subdivision plat. TABLE 1 COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS PRINCIPAL USES ACCESSORY USES MINIMUM LOT AREA N/A N/A MINIMUM LOT WIDTH N/A N/A MINIMUM SETBACKS(External) MINIMUM FRONT YARD - FROM EASTERN BOUNDARY (COLLIER BOULEVARD) 37 FEET S.P.S. MINIMUM SIDE YARD — FROM WESTERN BOUNDARY 20 FEET S.P.S. MINIMUM FRONT YARD —FROM NORTHERN BOUNDARY (MEASURED FROM 13T" AVE. SW 60' ROADWAY EASEMENT) 65 FEET S.P.S. MINIMUM SIDE YARD — FROM SOUTHERN BOUNDARY 20 FEET S.P.S. INTERNAL DRIVE AISLES N/A N/A PRESERVE BOUNDARY 25 FEET 10 FEET MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES 25 FEET S.P.S. MAXIMUM HEIGHT ZONED 38 FEET 35 FEET ACTUAL 45FEET 35 FEET MINIMUM FLOOR AREA 700 SQUARE FEET* N/A MAXIMUM GROSS AREA PER BUILDING 50,000 SQUARE FEET N/A S.P.S. = Same as Principal Structures *Per principal structure on the finished first floor. GENERAL: Except as provided for herein, all criteria set forth above shall be understood to be in relation to individual parcel or lot boundary lines, or between structures. If required, landscape buffers and lake maintenance easements shall be platted as separate tracts at time of SDP or Plat approval. Note: Nothing in this PUD document shall be deemed to approve a deviation from the LDC unless it is expressly stated in a list of deviations. 4050 13th Ave SW CPUD PUDZ-PL 20210003321 March 20, 2023 Page 2 of 10 ENGINEERING 6610 Willow Park Drive 4983 Royal Gulf Circle 19503 S West Villages Pkwy Suite 200 Fort Myers, FL 33966 Unit A5 Naples, FL 34109 Venice, FL 34293 Office: (239) 597-0575 Fax: (239) 597-0578 www.consult-rwa.com Florida Certificates of Authorization EB 7663 LB 6952 EXHIBIT C - MASTER PLAN FOR 4050 13TH AVE S VV CPUD PART OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 49S, RANGE 26E, NAPLES, FLORIDA PROJECT LOCATION O 13TH AVE SW VICINITY MAP N.T.S. r ,_ PROJECT r LOCATION T 0) cc V \0 MJ r: W IW J J 0 ; tm .� SITE LOCATION MAP PREPARED FOR/OWNED BY: SHAMROCK BUILDERS, INC. 9800 WEST POINT DR., SUITE 200 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46256 N.T.S. N W E ,S January 9, 2023 1:22 PM K:\2021\210069.00.01 4050 13 Avenue Rezone_CPA\0003 PUD Rezone Application Prep\MCP\MCP Plans\04 2100690000 CS01 - Pref. Opt..dwg COLLIER BLVD //_ / 10' �I I FPL GUY WIRE II 1 1 UTILITY EASEMENT II (OR 5452, PG 1704) 7.5' ROW EASEMENT PROPOSED—, Roaoseo- CURRENT USE: COUNTY RIGHT-OF-WAY, SF RESIDENTIAL BEYOND RIGHT TURN LANE ZONING DISTRICT: ESTATES LULU MIN. 65' SETBACK N Q LL =m L.L J a (OR 244, PG 948) (OR 1082, PG 326) W 0 W II � W � Cl) I a J LL 30' FPL 50' FPL LU U ESMT EASEMENT � OR 54521 i (OR 5452, Z N PG 1700) I PG 1708) III Fn Q 60' ROADWAY W (� EASEMENT I I N Z T I (PR7 PG151 � Z'I EX. SIDEWALK W/m � W N �I II It� 25'ENHANCED I I I BUFFER N V W I I > I II H 9 --------------------------------------- 0 - W/M - P - C - D/A - LDSCP - LEGEND PROPERTY BOUNDARY PROJECT INGRESS/EGRESS DEVIATION LOCATIONS WATER MANAGEMENT � PRESERVE COMMERCIAL TRACT 0 DRIVE AISLE � LANDSCAPE BUFFER (SEE EXHIBIT F, ENVIRONMENTAL, PARAGRAPH B) m N W N � H O Q N \ O Z U o PROPOSED ROW � W W aaZ COMPENSATION o 0 FOR TURN LANE w W W D/A rn �0; 25' ENHANCED 10- TYPE "A" 7.5' 1 ROW BUFFER BUFFER EASEMENT (WITH TREES 25' O.C. (TO BE VACATED) AND ALTERNATING (OR 244, PG 948) WITH ABUTTING (OR 1082, PG 326) BUFFER TO WEST) March 22, 2023 3:18 PM K.\2021 \210069.00.01 4050 13 Avenue Rezone_CPA\0003 PUD Rezone Application Prep\MCP\MCP Plans\05 2100690000 MP01 - Pref. Opt.. 15'± PRESERVE \1/ Ii/ \1/ Ii/ %I, %I, a P 0.37 AC. PARKING GATE 6' LDSCP AREA W 14, ' Ln D/A CURRENT USE: FPL SUBSTATION ZONING DISTRICT: ESTATES (E) C 20' MIN. SETBACK PROPERTY BOUNDARY 20' MIN. SETBACK 10' TYPE "A" BUFFER 7.5' ROW EASEMENT (TO BE VACATED) (OR 244, PG 948) (OR 1082, PG 326) Z O F- F- W cn Ca Im in W D Z W ~ VV w °C V ~ — Cn or � W 0 W Z J — aZ LL 0 N No W F- Z W cc V U 0 z v Of U w Un w coQ U +-j O M oc o Q o a, O N m Lr) 6i m co � J O 0 m �o �h am ra LO E m LU V Z O 0 v O �cc)�� W CDi Nj1}'� N ZU-( �� _� in u, O Q '^ V L j � >V _ O > a� LU p rn 4 M i N N o v o _o i Z W 6j W O J J [[ V 0- DATE DESIGNED: NOV. 17, 2022 RWA SEC: TWP: RGE: DRAWN: 15 49S 26E GMG PROJECT NO.: 210069.00.00 SHEET NUMBER: 2 OF 3 PRESERVE: 1. REQUIRED: ±0.37 AC (2.44 AC NATIVE VEGETATION x 15%) 2. PROVIDED: 0.37 AC OPEN SPACE: 1. REQUIRED OPEN SPACE: 30% OF THE 5.53 AC. OR 1.66 ACRES 2. PROVIDED OPEN SPACE: 30% INTENSITY: 1. MAXIMUM 174,000 SF SITE SUMMARY TRACT/AREA USE MAX S.F. AREA (ACRES) C COMMERCIAL 174,000 2.48 P PRESERVE 0.37 W/M WATER MANAGEMENT 0.38 D/A DRIVE AISLE 0.52 BUFFERS/ LANDSCAPE AREA/ EASEMENTS/ OPEN SPACE OPEN SPACE 1.78 TOTAL: 5.53 CPUD MASTER PLAN NOTES: 1. THE FACILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THIS PUD MASTER PLAN SHALL BE CONSIDERED CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE. 2. THE DESIGN, LOCATION, AND CONFIGURATION OF THE LAND IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE DEFINED AT EITHER PRELIMINARY SDP APPROVAL OR PPL APPROVAL. 3. PRESERVES MAY BE USED TO SATISFY THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER REQUIREMENT AFTER EXOTIC VEGETATION REMOVAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH LDC SECTION 4.06.02 AND 4.06.05.E.1. SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTINGS WITH NATIVE PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LDC SECTION 3.05.07. A MINIMUM 6-FOOT-WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER EASEMENT LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE PRESERVE WILL BE CONVEYED BY OWNER TO A OWNER'S ASSOCIATION OR CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION AT TIME OF SDP OR PLAT APPROVAL. IN THE EVENT THAT THE PRESERVE DOES NOT MEET THE BUFFER REQUIREMENT AFTER REMOVAL OF EXOTICS AND ADDITION OF SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING IN ACCORDANCE WITH 3.05.07) LANDSCAPE MATERIAL WILL BE PROVIDED BY OWNER IN THE 6' WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER EASEMENT OUTSIDE OF THE PRESERVE. THE SIZE AND NUMBER OF PLANTINGS WILL BE DETERMINED AT TIME OF INITIAL SDP OR PLAT. March 20, 2023 11:32 AM K.\2021 \210069.00.01 4050 13 Avenue Rezone_CPA\0003 PUD Rezone Application Prep\MCP\MCP Plans\06 2100690000 GN01 - Pref. Opt.. z 0 ■......eeo 0) O N IZT M a) Lfl (6 m � J O 0 M �o rD Q cy, m LU 2�o O O v to W O � N W a� Q Zi c in O Q rn Ln p v � O a LJZJ p Q) lV O V m O o LL U z LU o J coQ U w V, w O z z r U +-j w Q o o Q z w w w O J J � � U d H- DATE : DESIGNED: NOV. 17, 2022 RWA SEC: TWP: RGE DRAWN: 1S 49S 26E GMG PROJECT NO.: 210069.00.00 SHEET NUMBER: 03 of 03 ENGINEERING EXHIBIT D 4050 13th Ave Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) LEGAL DESCRIPTION* PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: PARCEL 1: TRACT 119, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT NO. 26, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, PAGE 15, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPT THE EAST 35 FEET AS DESCRIBED IN ORDER OF TAKING RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 4963, PAGE 2748, AND LESS AND EXCEPT THE WEST 260 FEET. PARCEL 2: TRACT 120, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT NO. 26, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, PAGE 15, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPT THE EAST 35 FEET AS DESCRIBED IN ORDER OF TAKING RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 4963, PAGE 2748, AND LESS AND EXCEPT THE WEST 260 FEET. CONTAINING 5.53 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. *Taken from Alta Survey Conducted By GradyMinor certified on 11/17/2021 - Plat Book 7, Pg 15 4050 13th Ave SW CPUD PUDZ-PL 20210003321 March 20, 2023 Page 6 of 10 ENGINEERING EXHIBIT E 4050 13th Ave Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) LIST OF DEVIATIONS At this time, there are no deviations being requested. 4050 13th Ave SW CPUD PUDZ-PL 20210003321 March 20, 2023 Page 7 of 10 ENGINEERING EXHIBIT F 4050 13th Ave SW Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) LIST OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS The purposed of this Section is to set forth the development commitments for the development of this project. GENERAL A. One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close-out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUDcommitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this PUD approval, the Managing Entity is CIG Naples, LLC. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments. B. Issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law." (Section 125.022, FS) C. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development. 4050 13th Ave SW CPUD PUDZ-PL 20210003321 March 20, 2023 Page 8 of 10 ENGINEERING TRANSPORTATION A. The maximum total daily trip generation for the PUD shall not exceed 26 two-way PM peak hour net trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval. UTILITIES A. At the time of application for subdivision Plans and Plat (PPL) and/or Site Development Plan (SDP) approval, as the case may be, offsite improvements and/or upgrades to the wastewater collection/transmission system may be required by owner to adequately handle the total estimated peak hour flow from the project. Whether or not such improvements are necessary, and if so, the exact nature of such improvements and/or upgrades shall be determined by county during PPL or SDP review. Such improvement and/or upgrades as may be necessary shall be permitted and installed at the developer's expense and may be required to be in place prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any portion or phase of the development that triggers the need for such improvements and/or upgrades. LIGHTING A. Consistent with public safety requirements and best practices for rural areas, outdoor lighting shall be placed, constructed, and maintained in such manner as to prevent or reduce light pollution. Light poles shall be limited to a mounting height of 15 ft and dark sky compliant (flat panel, full cut-off fixtures -backlight, up light and glare (BUG) rating where U=0) to avoid light trespass onto adjacent property. Site lighting fixtures will be a 3000K maximum color temperature. LANDSCAPING A. A minimum 25-foot-wide landscape buffer shall be provided along Collier Boulevard and 13th Avenue SW. This buffer shall contain two staggered rows of trees that shall be spaced no more than 30 feet on center, and a double row hedge at least 24 inches in height at time of planting and attaining a minimum of three feet height within one year. A minimum of 50% of the 25-foot- wide buffer area shall be comprised of a meandering bed of shrubs and ground covers other than grass. B. A 10-foot "Type A" buffer shall be provided along the project's western boundary. The buffer shall be consistent with "Type A" LDC requirements except that required trees shall be spaced no more than 25' on center. 4050 13th Ave SW CPUD PUDZ-PL 20210003321 March 20, 2023 Page 9 of 10 ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL A. This project has ±2.46 acres of existing native vegetation. A minimum of 15 percent of the existing native vegetation on -site shall be retained. The minimum required native vegetation for this CPUD is 0.37 acres. B. Preserves may be used to satisfy the landscape buffer requirement after exotic vegetation removal in accordance with LDC Section 4.06.02 and 4.05.05.E.1.1. Supplemental plantings with native plant materials shall be in accordance with LDC Section 3.05.07. A minimum 6-foot-wide landscape buffer easement located outside of the Preserve will be conveyed by Owner to an Owners' Association or Condominium Association at time of SDP or Plat approval. In the event that the Preserve does not meet the buffer requirement after removal of exotics and addition of supplemental plantings in accordance with Section 3.0507. Landscape material will be provided by Owner in the 6' wide landscape buffer easement outside of the preserve. The size and number of plantings will be determined at time of initial SDP or Plat. 4050 13th Ave SW CPUD PUDZ-PL 20210003321 March 20, 2023 Page 10 of 10 From: Richard L Owens <richard. l.owens@comcast.net> Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2022 5:38 PM To: McDaniel Bill; Burt.Sanders; OrtmanEric; SaboJames; TaylorPenny; Hansen Rachel; BellowsRay; LoCastroRick Cc: Mary Tatigian Subject: As a resident of Golden Gate Estates I beg that you do not rezone residential parcels for Commercial use. Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear County Commissioners and County Planners, Please do NOT rezone residential zoned parcels for Commercial use. It is your responsibility to abide by the Master Plan and the PUD already in place for the Golden Gate Estates. There are plenty of Commercial and industrial parcels for commercial businesses to build on. We both know why these greedy, out of town, entities want to convert residential parcels to commercial parcels, residential is less expensive. If you vote to change the residential zoning you are selling out ALL the residents of the Estates. If you want growth please do it responsibly. Richard & Kim Owens 4356 7t" Ave SW Naples FL 34119 RO: 239-258-1265 KO: 239-289-8953 From: Heidi Ann Cramer <heidianncramer@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2022 8:08 PM To: HansenRachel Subject: Fwd: CubeSmart Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Ms. Hansen: Hello, I hope this finds you well. I am writing in opposition to a commercial building being added to 13 Ave SW and Collier. My husband and I moved to Naples recently as co -owners of a business at the airport. We have been very happy with the area and our new home, however, we specifically chose to pay more for a house in a residential area with small shopping outlets targeted at local residents. Please help the developer choose another area already marked for commercial use, instead of trying to slip a large storage facility past you in a residential area. Thank you for your time and have a good evening. Heidi Cramer 4060 Lambs Way Naples, FL 34116 From: Jared Odor <jared.odor@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2022 6:24 PM To: OrtmanEric; Hansen Rachel Subject: Fwd: Resident Concern - Rezoning Attempt Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Eric and Rachel, Regarding the proposed conversion to a self storage facility on 13th Ave SW, I would be shocked if you found any residents in the area supporting this. Self storage is zero added value to the community and there are plenty of new facilities already in the area. There will be opposition by residents for any rezoning attempts away from single family residential purposes. That the property is surrounded by FPL is of no relevance to us. We didn't have an opportunity to oppose that, to my knowledge, so it's not relevant to us as a basis of rezoning. Additionally, the FPL presence on our street (the northern portion of the substation) was not built out when my family and many others moved onto the street more than 12 years ago. It is clearly a money play by the current property owner as they can make more money renting out 170,000 sqft storage than selling a single family home property. Their gain is at the detriment of the residents on the street. Please do not put the interests of a CubeSmart franchisee, or whomever it is, over the long term residents and taxpayers of Collier County. Respectfully, Jared Odor 4675 13th Ave SW Naples, FL 34116 Forwarded message From: Jared Odor <lared.odor@gmail.com> Date: Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 6:02 PM Subject: Resident Concern - Rezoning Attempt To: <Burt.Saunders@colliercountyfl.gov> Dear Burt, I'm writing to express my concern regarding a rezoning attempt at 13th Ave SW and Collier Blvd from residential to self storage. There are all sorts of reasons why I, and everyone on my street I've spoken with so far, are strongly against this: • We moved to the estates to be away of commercial properties like this. • We don't want the added non-residential traffic, which is already robust on 951. • My kids school bus stop is right at that intersection. • There is absolutely no need for additional storage facilities in this area. There are several in a few mile radius. • Housing shortages abound and are putting major strains on the local population, and employers trying to keep their businesses staffed! The last thing we need as a local community is to rezone existing residential to add zero value added commercial property. • Previous attempts to rezone that land failed, for all the same reasons. I wanted to express my concerns and avid opposition to this re -zoning attempt, but I also want you to be aware of the concerns of the citizens who have voted for you to be in this role representing us. To represent the citizens and voters on 13th Ave SW would be to oppose these rezoning efforts. Thank you for your time and understanding. Sincerely, Jared Odor 4675 13th Ave SW Naples, FL 34116 From: Tim Summers <timnapleshomes@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2022 5:05 PM To: HansenRachel Subject: Oppose Cube Smart planned on 13th AVE SW Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. As a resident of Golden Gate Estates I am opposed to the approval and change of residential zoning to allow Cube Smart Storage facility to be built in my neighborhood. I will be personally affected by the construction of this facility as I reside on the same street of the proposed storage facility. This is a residential neighborhood. None of the neighbors want to live by a commercial building with large tractor trailers driving in and out at all hours of the night. The constant influx of traffic in and out of this facility will significantly increase traffic, noise and disrupt all families living in my neighborhood. It will disrupt the peacefulness and the wildlife of the neighborhood. It is a well known fact that storage facilities are associated with an increase in crime rate and illegal activities. Other sites that are already zoned commercial and in industrial locations are available, where this storage facility can be built. STORAGE FACILITIES DON'T BELONG IN RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD. Please oppose the construction of this facility. Thank you very much for your time and consideration. Regards, Tim Summers From: Soledad Maghini <solemaghini@hotmail.com> Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2022 4:50 PM To: HansenRachel Subject: Oppose Cube Smart planned on 13th AVE SW Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. As a resident of Golden Gate Estates I am opposed to the approval and change of residential zoning to allow Cube Smart Storage facility to be built in my neighborhood. I will be personally affected by the construction of this facility as I reside on the same street of the proposed storage facility. This is a residential neighborhood. None of the neighbors want to live by a commercial building with large tractor trailers driving in and out at all hours of the night. The constant influx of traffic in and out of this facility will significantly increase traffic, noise and disrupt all families living on my neighborhood. It will disrupt the peacefulness and the wildlife of the neighborhood. It is well known fact that storage facilities are associated with increase in crime rate and illegal activities. Other sites that are already zoned commercial and in industrial locations are available, where this storage facility can be built. STORAGE FACILITIES DON'T BELONG IN RESIDENTIAL NEGHBORHOOD. Please oppose the construction of this facility. Thank you very much for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Soledad Maghini HansenRachel Subject: FW: 4050 13th Ave PUDZ From: Carrieboutl <carrieboutl@aol.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2023 4:43 PM To: OrtmanEric <Eric.Ortman@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: lertchp@comcast.net; gloriamarquesmelia@gmail.com; boutwellib.110@gmail.com Subject: Re: 4050 13th Ave PUDZ EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Eric, I am writing to express our opinion on the planned storage facility to be built on the corner of 951 and 13th Av SW in Naples, Florida. 13th Avenue SW is a residential street with many neighbors that have lived here over 30, some even 40 years. We have been here since 1988. For years there has been attempts to put different facilities on the corner that is "intended" for this new storage facility. There was even a thought of putting the County Morgue there at one time. The neighbors have always banded together to fight to keep our street "as is." We had no choice when FPL barged in with a huge substation at the end of the street with a loud humming noise and "who knows what" kind of EMF emissions coming from it. And of course, they too promised to beautify the property and we would all be happy. Did not happen. Now, a large storage unit. Enough is enough. We have children being dropped off and picked up on the corner for the county school buses. We have many neighbors that walk for exercise, ride bikes with their children and just enjoy being on a RESIDENTIAL street. Now we will have the added traffic to an already busy street due to this facility. Our vote is a big NO on the proposed construction. Sincerely, Carrie and John Boutwell 4760 13th Av SW 239-216-0813 From: Mary Tatigian <mtatigian@hotmail.com> Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2023 8:53 AM To: SaundersBurt; KowalDan; HallChris; McDaniel Bill; LoCastroRick; Hansen Rachel; OrtmanEric Subject: 13th Ave Storage Unit EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Good morning everyone, I see the plans are in the works for another storage unit. A huge storage unit. I do not see the need to put a building on every blade of grass we have. I ask you to consider the lives and quality of life of the current residents. The traffic alone would be a problem, Cty Rd 951 is already a traffic nightmare, with constant noise destroying quality of life, not what we bought into. I understand there is growth but there needs to be controlled growth. The beauty of Naples is being destroyed. The peace and quiet is being eroded. We pay our taxes to ensure a decent quality of life, our lives have significantly changed for the worse. There are bus tops all along Cty Rd 951, God forbid with this traffic there is not a tragedy. There are many residents who live close to Cty Rd 951 from Vanderbilt to Green, we need some form of protection from the noise pollution and growth. This is not part of the Golden Gate Masterplan either. Many reasons to object. Thank you, Mary Tatigian RN, BC President QuietFlorida.Org STOP NOISE POLLUTION info@guietfIorida.org Florida Affiliate of: Noise Free America.Org Quiet Communities.Org HansenRachel Subject: FW: Objection letter to upcoming hearing re: change of current codes to allow for storage units located at 4050 13th Ave SW on 4/20/2023 Attachments: image001.png From: Maureen Sullivan -Hartung <mshwrites@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2023 10:45 PM To: OrtmanEric <Eric.Ortman@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Objection letter to upcoming hearing re: change of current codes to allow for storage units located at 4050 13th Ave SW on 4/20/2023 EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Chairman Edwin Fryer, Eric Ortman and Collier County Planning Commissioners: This opposition letter has been forwarded to Mr. Ortman to deliver accordingly, as we spoke last Friday, especially since we have no actual spokesman or representation for District Three at this time, which disturbs me. I remember hearing about this variance request several months ago when it was also pointed out that there were already four existing vacant areas within a 15-20 mile radius out in the Estates, currently zoned for storage units, so it boggles my mind as to why we need to waste everyone's time, mail, meeting, etc. to reconsider this request to change the current code so this owner can build this business here on the property he purchased. Especially after knowing it was not zoned for this request when he made that purchase!! What is the point of having rules and regulations if we keep changing them to suit people's requests? I'm no professional planner here, but this just doesn't seem right or pass the smell test. I've no problem with someone wanting to own his own business and make money, but not at the expense of others where all the current rules and regulations that have been previously drawn up, for the good of our community, are simply thrown to the wind. I've no idea when the last traffic study was completed on Collier Boulevard, but it IS a year-round busy road that definitely does not need any additional traffic coming from 13th Ave SW trying to get in and out of this site. And we are not interested in the bright lights & noise that come with this type of business either. I've lived in my home one block away on 15th Ave SW for the past 33 years, as of July, and slowly but surely businesses keep encroaching into our mostly residential area. When does it stop? Why aren't the current rules enforced? What comes next? The only business that was here in 1991 was Florida Power & Light, and now we have a postal annex, and more recently, a new healthcare facility that was built to help those from the Estates area. Thank you for your time and consideration to my objections. Sincerely, Maureen Sullivan -Hartung 4120 15th Ave SW Naples, FL 34116 239-450-4549 Oops, I've one last remark on this matter. This notice may have been mailed on the 11th, according to the postmark, but I didn't receive my copy until two days later, on the 13th. According to your regulations stated on the notice, "persons wishing to have written ... must submit materials a minimum of ten (10) days prior to the respective hearing." My mail is usually late in arriving, anywhere from 3-6 PM, and I picked this notice out of my mailbox after 5 PM on the 13th, which is seven (7) days out, not the 10 you require. I believe this mailing time needs to be adjusted, because the mail delivery appears to be yet another victim of the COVID time frame - behind schedule. I believe a two-wk mailing prior to the scheduled hearing should provide everyone involved with ample time. Brooke Beardsley 4661 13th Ave SW Naples FL 34116 April 18, 2023 Collier County Planning Board Committee Members My name is Brooke Beardsley and I wish to voice my strong opposition to this rezone application. I have lived in Naples my entire life and on this street since the late 1990's. I live with my two school -aged children who are enrolled in the district. Golden Gate Estates is a semi -rural community of 1-5 acre home sites where people are allowed to have home workshops, horses, chickens and gardens. It was never intended to be a community where all major roadways are lined with commercial development after commercial development. It is a community that appreciates a slower pace since I moved here and we have the right to maintain or way of life. The burden for making a case to change the zoning lies on the shoulders of the developers. am here along with my neighbors to voice opposition in this due process, and to provide opposition to this unwanted commercial sprawl. A few years ago we successfully defeated a rezoning request, and I ask for each committee member to vote "no" to this application for the same reasons as before: this re -zone request does not support the quiet serene nature of the community, is not desirable nor appropriate Please consider the following when making your decision: 1) The current conditional zoning allows for a church, daycare facility's, utility, or model home. This is in line with the nature of the neighborhood and supports the needs of the residents. 2) Currently very large residential homes estimated in excess of a million dollars are being built on 951. This property may be of interest to a model home builder. 3) Estates property values are increasing, with one home that recently sold on 1311 for over 1.1 M and another new home listed at 1.98M. Commercial development generally brings adjacent residential home values down. 4) Any commercial rezoning will open the community to far more pollution, traffic, noise, light, and crime than any of the allowed conditional uses. 5) Traffic use will continue to increase as more people build in Golden Gate Estates. Allowing for Commercial development will add to these future burdens, compounding the problem. 6) To allow for a rezone such as this one will provide approval precedent, opening up the community to similar commercial. It will make commercial development more common and far more widespread, with developers feeling entitled to such approvals. 7) The psychological effect on the community will be negative, as the first thing that people encounter as they enter the neighborhood will be an abrasive commercial facility and larger traffic lanes. 8) Lee County is considering a moratorium on new storage facility development approvals due to their low economic and cultural value to the greater good of the community. See attached Naples Daily News article. 9) Children K-12th grade wait for the bus at the corner of 13th and 951 every day of the week. This development will increase traffic on the roadway in the mornings and afternoon, and will increase the risk to collision with a child. Especially if the access is granted on 13t" Ave SW. We purchased property in the Estates to escape the eyesores and fast pace of commercial, and as residents of the community, we humbly ask you to support us by strongly denying the application before you. Respectfully Submitted, Brooke Beardsley From: Cindy Gray <ningraycampinghome@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2023 12:59 PM To: HansenRachel Subject: Stop Colossal Cubesmart on Collier Blvd and 13th Ave SW EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Hello, I am Cynthia Gray representing the Gray Family. We live at 4730 13th Ave SW, Naples, FL 34116. We are a family of four and we are raising our 6 year old granddaughter. I want to express our concerns for the building of the Colossal Cubesmart at the end of our street. Not only will this cause traffic problems for the area, but more importantly It will be a hazard for the kids, including my granddaughter, who wait for the school bus there every school day! Also, FPL already has their massive power plant there and this could create another hazardous situation. It is dangerous to have the storage facility so close! if there was a fire or other problem, everyone on this street would be locked in! This is the only way out of our neighborhood! As it is, semi -trucks who come down our road have no way of turning around and must back up the whole way out because it is a dead end road. This is a quiet neighborhood and we love our trees and green space. The Colossal cubesmart building will be an eye -sore with its bright colored four story building looming above and trucks pulling in and out banging around as they load and unload! Please find another industrial type area for this building, not a quiet residential neighborhood with lots of kids who depend on feeling safe at the bus stop at the end of the street! Thank you for listening, Sincerely, Cynthia Gray Clark Gray Cameron Gray Elena Gray From: OrtmanEric Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2023 3:54 PM To: HansenRachel Subject: FW: Public Input Shamrock Self Storage (PL20220000289 & PL20210003321) From: Beth Rozansky <beth.a.rozansky@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2023 5:33 PM To: FryerEdwin <Edwin.Fryer@colIiercountyfl.gov>; SparrazzaRandy <Randy.Sparrazza@colliercountyfl.gov>; SparrazzaRandy <Randy.Sparrazza@colliercountyfl.gov>; KlucikRobert <Robert.Klucik@colliercountyfl.gov>; SheaPaul<Paul.Shea@colliercountvfl.gov>; SchmittJoseph <Joseph.Schmitt@colliercountvfl.gov>; BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows@colliercountvfl.gov>; lockha@collierschools.com <lockha@collierschools.com> <lockha@collierschools.com>; VernonChristopher <Christopher.Vernon@colliercountvfl.gov> Cc: OrtmanEric <Eric.Ortman@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Public Input Shamrock Self Storage (PL20220000289 & PL20210003321) EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Planning Commission Members, Thank you for the opportunity to enter my public input into the record on the Shamrock Self Storage petitions (PL20220000289 & PL20210003321). I am a nearby resident to the subject property, who lives on 11t" Avenue SW. I will be unable to attend the PC meeting and speak my comments, however strongly request your discussion and consideration of the following issues on the developer's proposal. Safety Issues: The comp plan amendment of this property, changing it from residential to commercial use, with an access along Collier Blvd, presents significant safety concerns. The current roadway level of service is D and by allowing a 174,000 sq. ft. storage facility with direct access there will be adverse impacts on the ability of this road to continue serving the high-speed and high -volume traffic it is intended to support. Furthermore, the high speeds and traffic volume along Collier Blvd do not support the U-turns necessary to enter the proposed development on Collier Blvd. As noted in development review comments, the County transportation planning staff and their engineering consultant evaluated the potential for a U-turn movement by a box -type truck and advised it would require a 3-point turn. Allowing for up to the (proposed max) of 26 PM peak hour trips on Collier Blvd in this area is not mindful of the safety of our community, of the residents in this area. No doubt those turns will result in increased traffic collisions within this area. Additionally, the subject property is at the location of a school bus stop, another point of safety concern for our community. Reading through the applicant's response to staff's review on the topic of access location: 'we'll agree to disagree and discuss how public interest is best served during hearings.' I challenge you to request the applicant elaborate on how public interest is served through the intensification of this site to a commercial designation. The proposed site plan did not include any above minimum required allowances, as preserve and open space were at minimum required, the safety of the local transportation network was not a concern, nor was there anything proffered that serves the community (i.e. a bus stop for the children at the corner of this proposed commercial property). Lighting Height: The Growth Management Plan proposed text amendment notes that light poles will have a maximum 'mounting height'. As read within staff's review comments, it was repeatedly requested to remove the term 'mounting' before height. This is another 'agree to disagree' comment of the applicant. This ambiguous terminology should not be in a text amendment and needs to be vetted. Incompatibly in Intensity: Although there is an existing compatibility issue with retaining the subject property as residential (estates), amongst its neighboring uses, it is not supported to increase the land use with a significant change of commercial zoning. The neighboring non-residential properties also do not have direct access along Collier Blvd. To approve the change of this property from residential to a more intense zoning designation is not reasonable and compatible with the neighbors. Furthermore, should access be agreed upon for the proposed development along 13t" Avenue, it will have a negative effect to the nearby residents. The proposed development presents safety issues for the local transportation network and the neighborhood traffic on 131" Avenue. Please make your decision and recommendations considering the impacts of safety on the local transportation network and community. Thank you for your time. Beth Rozansky size=2 width="100%" align=center> Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. HansenRachel Subject: FW: Shamrock Storage Signs Not Visible Attachments: Shamrock Storage Signs Not Visible.pdf From: Angelique B. <angeligueblitch@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2023 11:20 AM To: OrtmanEric <Eric.Ortman@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Shamrock Storage Signs Not Visible EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Good Morning Eric, I appreciate you bringing my Public Notice Sign concerns up to the developers of the proposed Shamrock / CubeSmart warehouse. I noticed in response they uploaded close-up photos and an affidavit certifying the location of their signs to the GMP Portal. It looks okay on their aerial map, but in reality the signs are not reasonably visible. I have attached some additional photos from the road to demonstrate how the signs have been hidden and obstructed as much as possible. Also of note, Shamrock / CubeSmart's conceptual rendering shows two enormous signs gracing the entrance to our wooded residential neighborhood directly on the corners of Collier and 13th; clearly they agree this would be the best location for the most visible and useful sign. The developers also seem very confident that another storage facility is desperately needed and wanted by all of the nearby residents. If they truly believe that, then the developers should be fearless and proud in their sign placement, not hiding required Public Notice Signs behind utility poles. Sincerely, Angelique Blitch Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Shamrock Storage Required Sign Notices - Signs Not Visible Corner of Collier and 13th, CubeSmart's optimum sign location Same corner as above, but no Public Notice Signs are visible 1. t---'�T7�71- *All photos taken at 10:30 am on 4/20/2023 From: Susie Gerrells <susie668@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2023 5:40 PM To: Susie Gerrells Subject: No cube smart Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Hello I do NOT want cube smart put into my neighborhood (I'd be 1 block) from this monstrosity! We moved this way to have space , quiet and peace not the crime that comes with massive storage complexes. There are many issues for this deeply flaws storage unit complex idea. The turning in this area is already a major issue with people coming on vacation and not knowing where they are going add that massive moving trucks will be coming in and out of a storage unit complex will cause many more accidents. Additionally children are dropped off the school bus near here and this will create more issues for their safety! This is a high highly desired location and neighborhood and people do not want the storage unit here - access to a storage unit is a rare thing there is no reason to build ANoTHER one so close to the beach - building it further out and allowing the land here to be for the PEOPLE is what we need! Additionally it being so close to a power plant is unsafe and could risk us being put in some kind of situation if there was ever an issue with that since who knows what people store in units. A storage center being further from hurricane impact would be better and safer for the whole community. Thank you Susie Gerrells From: Jaesen Petretta <jaesenp@yahoo.com> Sent: Sunday, April 30, 2023 6:14 AM To: McDaniel Bill; burt.sanders@colliercountyfl.gov; HallChris; KowalDan; OrtmanEric; Hansen Rachel; LoCastroRick Subject: Stop residential re -zoning! EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Collier County Officials, I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed construction of a storage warehouse on currently zoned residential property in Golden Gate Estate. As a resident of this community, I believe that this project is inconsistent with the Golden Gate Area Master Plan and could have significant negative impacts on the surrounding area. The Golden Gate Area Master Plan outlines specific guidelines for land use and development in our community, with a focus on promoting sustainable growth, preserving natural resources, and enhancing quality of life for residents. The plan encourages the development of mixed -use areas that include a variety of land uses, such as residential, commercial, and public facilities. However, a storage warehouse on residential property may not contribute to this goal. Policy 2.1.5 states that Collier County shall discourage new land uses that impede pedestrian activity and are solely auto -oriented such as car washes, storage facilities, auto dealerships and drive-throughs. A storage warehouse on residential property may not be consistent with these guidelines. Furthermore, the plan emphasizes the need for compatibility between different land uses to ensure the health, safety, welfare, and quality of life of local residents. A storage warehouse on residential property may not be compatible with surrounding residential areas and could potentially have negative impacts on property values and quality of life. In addition to these concerns, I believe that a storage warehouse on currently zoned residential property may require significant infrastructure improvements that could be costly or difficult to implement. The plan encourages the provision of basic services and infrastructure to support new development in Golden Gate but also emphasizes the need to balance these provisions with natural resource concerns. A storage warehouse on residential property may require significant infrastructure improvements such as road widening, traffic signals, and drainage systems that could be costly or difficult to implement. Moreover, a storage warehouse on currently zoned residential property may have negative environmental impacts. The plan aims to promote sustainable development practices that minimize negative impacts on the environment and natural resources. A storage warehouse could negatively impact the environment and natural resources in the area. The plan encourages neighborhood parks, open space, and recreational centers as part of community planning programs. A storage warehouse on residential property may not contribute to the creation or preservation of these amenities. Finally, a storage warehouse on currently zoned residential property may not align with the transportation objectives outlined in the plan. The plan aims to improve transportation options for residents by promoting alternative modes of transportation such as walking, biking, and public transit. A storage warehouse on residential property may increase traffic congestion and discourage alternative modes of transportation. For these reasons and others outlined in the Golden Gate Area Master Plan, I strongly urge you to deny approval for the proposed construction of a storage warehouse on currently zoned residential property in our community. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Please visit our petition at https://www.change.org/StopTheStorage Sincerely, Jaesen Petretta 4281 7th ave sw 34119 Sent from my Whone From: michael.d.adriaanse@gmail.com Sent: Saturday, April 29, 2023 9:33 PM To: michael.d.adriaanse@gmail.com Subject: Opposition to the proposed storage warehouse on 13th Ave SW in Golden Gate Estates. Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Collier County Official, I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed construction of a storage warehouse on currently zoned residential property in Golden Gate Estate. As a resident of this community, I believe that this project is inconsistent with the Golden Gate Area Master Plan and could have significant negative impacts on the surrounding area. The Golden Gate Area Master Plan outlines specific guidelines for land use and development in our community, with a focus on promoting sustainable growth, preserving natural resources, and enhancing quality of life for residents. The plan encourages the development of mixed -use areas that include a variety of land uses, such as residential, commercial, and public facilities. However, a storage warehouse on residential property may not contribute to this goal. Policy 2.1.5 states that Collier County shall discourage new land uses that impede pedestrian activity and are solely auto -oriented such as car washes, storage facilities, auto dealerships and drive-throughs. A storage warehouse on residential property may not be consistent with these guidelines. Furthermore, the plan emphasizes the need for compatibility between different land uses to ensure the health, safety, welfare, and quality of life of local residents. A storage warehouse on residential property may not be compatible with surrounding residential areas and could potentially have negative impacts on property values and quality of life. In addition to these concerns, I believe that a storage warehouse on currently zoned residential property may require significant infrastructure improvements that could be costly or difficult to implement. The plan encourages the provision of basic services and infrastructure to support new development in Golden Gate but also emphasizes the need to balance these provisions with natural resource concerns. A storage warehouse on residential property may require significant infrastructure improvements such as road widening, traffic signals, and drainage systems that could be costly or difficult to implement. Moreover, a storage warehouse on currently zoned residential property may have negative environmental impacts. The plan aims to promote sustainable development practices that minimize negative impacts on the environment and natural resources. A storage warehouse could negatively impact the environment and natural resources in the area. The plan encourages neighborhood parks, open space, and recreational centers as part of community planning programs. A storage warehouse on residential property may not contribute to the creation or preservation of these amenities. Finally, a storage warehouse on currently zoned residential property may not align with the transportation objectives outlined in the plan. The plan aims to improve transportation options for residents by promoting alternative modes of transportation such as walking, biking, and public transit. A storage warehouse on residential property may increase traffic congestion and discourage alternative modes of transportation. For these reasons and others outlined in the Golden Gate Area Master Plan, I strongly urge you to deny approval for the proposed construction of a storage warehouse on currently zoned residential property in our community. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, Michael D. Adriaanse From: Patti Raco <patti.raco@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, April 30, 2023 4:59 PM To: HansenRachel Subject: Stop this project EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Collier County Officials, I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed construction of a storage warehouse on currently zoned residential property in Golden Gate Estate. As a resident of this community, I believe that this project is inconsistent with the Golden Gate Area Master Plan and could have significant negative impacts on the surrounding area. The Golden Gate Area Master Plan outlines specific guidelines for land use and development in our community, with a focus on promoting sustainable growth, preserving natural resources, and enhancing quality of life for residents. The plan encourages the development of mixed -use areas that include a variety of land uses, such as residential, commercial, and public facilities. However, a storage warehouse on residential property may not contribute to this goal. Policy 2.1.5 states that Collier County shall discourage new land uses that impede pedestrian activity and are solely auto -oriented such as car washes, storage facilities, auto dealerships and drive-throughs. A storage warehouse on residential property may not be consistent with these guidelines. Furthermore, the plan emphasizes the need for compatibility between different land uses to ensure the health, safety, welfare, and quality of life of local residents. A storage warehouse on residential property may not be compatible with surrounding residential areas and could potentially have negative impacts on property values and quality of life. In addition to these concerns, I believe that a storage warehouse on currently zoned residential property may require significant infrastructure improvements that could be costly or difficult to implement. The plan encourages the provision of basic services and infrastructure to support new development in Golden Gate but also emphasizes the need to balance these provisions with natural resource concerns. A storage warehouse on residential property may require significant infrastructure improvements such as road widening, traffic signals, and drainage systems that could be costly or difficult to implement. Moreover, a storage warehouse on currently zoned residential property may have negative environmental impacts. The plan aims to promote sustainable development practices that minimize negative impacts on the environment and natural resources. A storage warehouse could negatively impact the environment and natural resources in the area. The plan encourages neighborhood parks, open space, and recreational centers as part of community planning programs. A storage warehouse on residential property may not contribute to the creation or preservation of these amenities. Finally, a storage warehouse on currently zoned residential property may not align with the transportation objectives outlined in the plan. The plan aims to improve transportation options for residents by promoting alternative modes of transportation such as walking, biking, and public transit. A storage warehouse on residential property may increase traffic congestion and discourage alternative modes of transportation. For these reasons and others outlined in the Golden Gate Area Master Plan, I strongly urge you to deny approval for the proposed construction of a storage warehouse on currently zoned residential property in our community. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Please visit our petition at https://www.change.org/StopTheStorage All the Best Patti Raco-Treamer From: wm moss <wtommoss@hotmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, May 3, 2023 9:41 AM To: HansenRachel Subject: Shamrock Self Storage- 4050 13th Ave SW Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner, We purchased our 5 acre property at 4316 13th Ave SW in 1998, and built our house on that property in 2002. We first checked the zoning to be sure we were in a protected residential zone, and the zoning confirmed that the land was in such an area. Our only concern was the FPL facility, but we knew that it was and is an essential need, and that FPL would comply with all environmental, esthetic, and safety codes. Growth has had a negative impact on our homesite in several ways. First, the FPL site was expanded north to 13th Ave. This land was acquired from a private property owner. It was five acres of residential zones land. While FPL complied with code, we still would have preferred to have had homes built on the property that was zones residential. The second negative impact of growth in our immediate area was expanding to six lanes of Collier Blvd.. I don't precisely understand why, but it is now more difficult to access Collier Blvd for us on 13th Ave and surrounding avenues . There seems to be more traffic now than when Collier was 4 lanes. Go figure ! Going north on Collier now requires us to go south on Collier approximately a mile and then make a U- turn at Green Blvd.. As reasonable citizens, we understand that these two developments are in the Essential Need category and we just have to bite the bullet. The need category for this proposed storage unit is in the zero need category. In fact it is a detriment. Also, the north end of the proposal is directly across the street from a residence. The home immediately across from the proposal, is a family with four young children. For many reasons, this is a serious safety issue. There is a school bus stop at the intersection that will be drastically impacted by this proposal ,as well. This would an extremely concerning safety issue for all the K-12 children and their parents, that have a bus stop at the end of 13th nee. As far as the need issue, the smallest residential lots in the surrounding area are 1 % acre and expand to five acres. Anyone can easily obtain a permit, purchase a shed, and air condition it for much less than the cost to rent a storage unit . This puts the storage facility in a zero need category for the area. The applicants keep chanting that they want to be good neighbors. They can do that by simply putting their project in an area already zoned for commercial. We bought homes here for a reason, and we want to continue to have a quality of life that we envisioned would continue, and ultimately be protected from commercial rezoning. Just say no to rezoning. We want to keep our quiet, safe street from commercial encroachment. Respectfully, Tom & Lisa Moss 239 537 6845 239-821 2213 P.S. Rachel please acknowledge receipt, thanks Sent from Mail for Windows From: Chris Dickeson <c.dickeson@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, May 3, 2023 4:35 PM To: Hansen Rachel; OrtmanEric; LoCastroRick; KowalDan; HallChris; burt.sanders@colliercountyfl.gov; McDanielBill Subject: Potential rezoning in the estates Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Collier County Officials, I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed construction of a storage warehouse on currently zoned residential property in Golden Gate Estates, specifically on the end of 13th Ave SW & 951. As a resident of 15th Ave SW for 10 years (and resident of Collier County for 41 years), traffic has only gotten worse over the years. 951 southbound backs up past my street with regularity in the mornings and evenings as it is with people commuting and doing their things, the introduction of a storage facility in the vicinity would only make it drastically worse for north and southbound. Apparently a recent traffic count on Wednesday April 12, 2023 recorded 6,371 vehicles traveling from North to South on Collier Blvd between 6:00 am and 9:00 am. As has already been stated by others there are storage facilities a plenty existing right now in Collier, and there are also already commercially zoned areas available if Cube Smart really wants to build another storage facility in Collier. I strongly urge you to deny approval for the proposed construction of a storage warehouse on currently zoned residential property in our community. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Please visit our petition at https://www.change.org/StopTheStorage It was at 400 signatures as of the time I write this email on 5/3/23. Sincerely, Chris Dickeson From: Gloria Marques Mejia <gloriamarquesmejia@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, May 4, 2023 9:46 PM To: SparrazzaRandy; VernonChristopher; FryerEdwin; KlucikRobert; Shea Paul; SchmittJoseph; manager@seapointnc.com; Hansen Rachel; Eric.Ortman@colliercountyfl.fov Cc: Patricia S Lertch Subject: 13th Ave SW Rezone Attachments: zoning .pdf Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Golden Gate Estate GMP Amendment SHAMROCK PL20210003321 and PL20220000289 Please look at the attached file Our vote is NO to Rezoning on Collier Blvd & 951. Gloria Marques 4695 13th Ave SW, Naples, FL 34116 "13th Ave SW Rezone" Golden Gate Estate GMP Amendment SHAMROCK PL20210003321 and PL20220000289 Please Planners; we built community not storages!!! Our Vote is NO, to the colossal Cubesmart on Collier BLVD & 13Th Ave SW This lot is surrounded by an electrical substation; it cannot be considered as any other lot with conditional land use; a lot of things can't be done on this corner and WE HAVE ENOUGH with this awful power station, on 13th SW Ave. We couldn't say "no" to this extension, and now they want to put a huge concrete volume!! Stop!!! We are people living here, not only houses!!! -• The reasons we don't want this structure close to us are the following: Security It is no secret to anyone about the things that can happen in storage facilities, from crimes to illegal substance laboratories, to a series of uncontrollable things that appear daily in the news; With the economic situation, people are choosing to live in these units with fatal outcomes in many cases. Now, the proximity to 75 makes it an easy target for thugs who come from other cities to commit their misdeeds and can return without any problem through this main route. The facility remains open, but unattended, for many each night. The staff can only monitor what took place during that time period by reviewing security camera footage in the morning. Environment Impact Large storage facilities rent to users without portraying their immense use of lighting, heating, cooling, and humidity control required for each unit. Every rental immediately impacts the environment, all while everyone's extra items are stored in boxes for years. These units are negatively impacting the environment, because the construction of new developments results in the demolition of existing habitats; trees 'II be destroyed and removed from the area, leaving this green area that helped to hide the atrocity of the electrical substation plant that we had to put up with; In addition to muffling the noise generated by the cars that pass through Collier, they will generate noise pollution. Trees and habitats do not grow back in a short timeframe, and they take time to become the carbon collecting system they once were. As we continue to build, we are destroying crucial parts of nature that help to maintain the health of our environment. environment more than one would have considered. Wrong zoning? The zone for the storage should be located in the industrial zone not in a Residential area; they create so many conflicts for the resident people; they only help a few who live far from these units. Urbanly, the storages are ghettos that separate the neighborhoods from the rest of the city and of course do not create a community, which is why it should prevail in the Master Plan. The inhabitants of the neighborhood will never be favored by this structure; on the contrary, they will be negatively affected, lowering the price of their properties. Ah, but yes, they will greatly help the pockets of the few property owners who bought lots in cheap residential areas to profit by changing their zoning. The collective interest should prevail over the individual, right? This is not fair to the residents of this 13th street community. We have a traffic conflict now. The traffic that is generated on Collier is now causing problems for the residents on 13th avenue. It is impossible to leave in the morning hours without having to wait a long time to access the Collier lanes, especially since most of the residents have to make a U turn on Green Bulevard to go to our workplace, which means that we cannot cross to the right and stay in that lane, but we have to go to the left lane and that is completely difficult because the cars come at a considerable speed; considering that on the Pine Ridge Road they only make a stop and can continue on the Collier ; same for the the cars that are leaving the commercial plaza; It means that there is always traffic; residents of 13th Ave can not get out easily; and we are no talking yet about the conflict generated with the School buses. With storage, It's going to increase traffic considerably now if there are 3 or 4 cars waiting to get into the Collier, and cars waiting to enter to the storage unit , this a conflict point that can cause a lot of accidents. w• Too many storages! How many units fit in the area that they are proposing? This is even more serious because the owners have not shown us the plans, we do not know how many units they'll be, but to get an estimate of how many cars could come to the street we'll do this estimate. In 5 acres They say they are going to put 168,000 856 SQF The most used are units of 1 OF x1 OF or 20Fx1 OF 10Fx 1OF= 500 units = 50,000 SQFt 10Fx 20F=594 units=118.856 SQF 1.094 Units=168.856 SQF Too many storages! How many units fit in the area that they are proposing? This is even more serious because the owners have not shown us the plans, we do not know how many units they'll be, but to get an estimate of how many cars could come to the street we'll do this estimate. In 5 acres They say they are going to put 168,000 856 SQF The most used are units of 1 OF x1 OF or 20Fx1 OF 10Fx 1OF= 500 units = 50,000 SQFt 10Fx 20F=594 units=118.856 SQF 1.094 Units=168.856 SQF If each store represents a car or a we are already talking about there being 1094 units that would be 1.094 cars making an average arrival only three times per month he would be giving us an average of 109 cars every day plus the cars every day are going or coming to our neighborhood. We have 56 families with two cars (some families have more than 2 cars) . We are talking about 122 cars per day, PLUS about 109 more cars coming every day. Well, we are not talking about peak hours or anything. only the number of cars that would be entering and exiting our community.... They'll increase the traffic in our neighborhood in 90% That is WRONG. Health Hazards & Precautions Not everything about power stations & sub -stations is convenient. Staying near them might create some health hazards. Mentioned below are some of the health hazards associated with staying near a power generating unit. The high voltage can generate Electromagnetic Field (EMF) which are known to have carcinogenic effects (Cancer Causing). Unfortunately, people staying near stations or substations have chances of getting exposed to large volumes of EMFs. This may result in brain cancer, Alzheimer's disease, Lou Gehrig's disease, miscarriage, breast cancer, birth defects, fatigue, hormonal imbalances etc. Not to forget decreased libido, sleeping disorders, heart disease, neuro-degenerative disease and much more. If you live a short distance from an electrical power station with your family having kids and pets; another potential danger for children & pets is running into a dangerous spot. Noise and more Noise from a power plant is of particular concern to nearby residents, medical facilities, schools, daycares, or users of nearby parks or other recreational places. Noise of different frequencies can have different effects. Lower frequencies are often felt as vibration, or have the effects of vibration on structures. Heavy vibration can be annoying to nearby residents or cause damage to structures. There might be other problems such as noise along with interference with mobile phone networks, wi-fi connections and TV receptions. Land Use Compatibility compatibility of activities all the dangers that power plants have must be camouflaged with some activities that are compatible with what is there, place some storage units nearby It is dangerous because it is not known what things `II be there. People can cause danger or with materials that may be inside accidentally causing fire .....We already have enough with this power plant that was put in place without consent because it was part of an extension of an existing structure, that's ENOUGH. We don't need more things that cause such a big impact like this plant, now they want to place something worse on the corner because if the city already ruined our neighbor they don't care to continue destroying our community... They don't live here and they don't care what happens to us; they just want to have the best return on their investment. Enough is enough Negative Visual impacts for local landowners and for the rest of the city. Gloria Marques 4695 13Th Ave SW Naples FI 34116 Lines moving trucks and self -storage customers will be stopping traffic and manuvering around the School Bus Stop and parents and kids. AUTIQN H AVE SW AE CHILDREN BUSIEST and LARGEST Self -Storage in all of Collier County - FOUR times the size of Publix - BIGGER than Super Target - 38 feet tall, towering over neighbors - Owner of Peluso Moving & Storage (United Van Lines) is a part-owner CAUTION 951 WIDE RIGHT TURNS 951 f s#O Jennifer Adriaanse -Resident- 4460 1 Ph Ave SW, Naples, FL 34116 I am 5th Generation born and raised in Naples, Florida, specifically Golden Gate Estates. I have lived in the estates for 40 years, the last 15 years, specifically on I Ith Ave SW, located 1 street north from the proposed warehouse storage unit. The building of the warehouse on the 5 acres of 13th Ave contradicts OBJECTIVE 2.1- Goal 3- of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan which states: TO PRESERVE THE AREA'S RURAL CHARACTER, AS DEFINED BY LARGE WOODED LOTS, WILDLIFE ACTIVITY, ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP AND LIMITATIONS ON COMMERCIAL AND CONDITIONAL USES. We currently have an abundance of raccoons, armadillo, birds, rabbits, foxes, coyotes, box turtles, and protected gopher tortoises. All these animals rely on the wooded acreage for their lively hood which will be destroyed with the allowance of building this massive warehouse. The larger wildlife have already been pushed out of our neighborhood. It has been 9 years since I last saw a family of black bears, 5 years since I saw a protected Florida panther, and 3 years since I saw a family of deer on my street. However, if you take the time to ride your bike in the early morning to the retention pond at Golden Gate Blvd and Collier Blvd, on some mornings you can see a family of deer drinking from the pond. Though both areas are located within the Golden Gate Master Plan, there is a noticeable difference between the location at Golden Gate Blvd and Collier Blvd vs 13th Ave SW where the proposed warehouse may be developed. The location at Golden Gate Blvd and Collier is surrounded by acreage of land, a large retention pond which provides for wildlife activity and ZERO commercial buildings allowing a welcoming space for wildlife. 4050 13th Ave SW, where the warehouse is seeking proposal, is zoned residential. There is a commercially zoned neighborhood shopping plaza with multiple out parcels to the north while to the south you can find an oversized FPL station, Post Office annex, and a large hospital which has pushed the larger wildlife away as there is NO longer an existing wooded habitat. These buildings south of 13th Ave SW, have literally "paved paradise and put up a parking lot", breaking OBJECTIVE 2.1- Goal 3 of the Golden Gate Area Master Plans "preservation of wildlife activity, preserving rural character with large wooded lots" by allowing these commercial areas to demolish almost every tree and leaving no room for preserve. With the building of this warehouse, the last wooded area and natural habitat will also be destroyed. The only exception of any preserve left in our area is to the North of 13th Ave. It is located on 1 Ith Ave SW at the neighborhood Publix shopping plaza. The small back southwest corner of the Publix shopping plaza remains wooded and has a sitting area where you can frequently see an Eagle drinking from the retention pond. Major downsides to this preserve area in a commercial setting is evident by the horrendous amount of liter in which we have seen people throw out of their cars while as they turn into the Publix shopping plaza, lack of proper landscaping maintenance, and multiple sightings of homeless using the area to sleep which also affects the safety of our community residents and children at the bus stop. I can guarantee 131h Ave SW will see an uptick in all of these issues as well if this warehouse is built. Per Commissioner Locastro's Commissioner Report emailed out on May 2, 2023 at 9:42am- regarding "US 41 Overlay Plan for District 1": Quote- "at our April 25th Board of County Commissioner meeting... we continued to approved steps to ensure the progress and finality of this analysis which will ensure going forward we have established stronger criteria for design and construction. Much like the "Golden Gate Master Plan" -- which has often protected areas of that District 3 community from haphazard construction, unneeded/unwanted commercial buildings, and which gives citizens much more voice when it comes to things being added to their community." In 2019, discussion of a temporary Ban of storage units in district 1 was backed by Commissioner Locastro seeing that were already 20 storage units in district 1. Quote from Naples daily news article: "Everybody wants to live in a beautiful community, and industrial things are important ... if you have a tire changing center, an auto parts store, storage units ... but come to that strip of district one... there's five in a row," said District One County Commissioner Rick LoCastro, the one behind the proposal. Again, look what is happening to our little piece of paradise between Green Blvd and Pine Ridge Rd, on the West side of Collier Blvd.- where the warehouse is seeking proposal. Again, we have a Publix shopping plaza, with multiple independent parcels surrounding it which include a bank, dentist, walk in clinic, tropical smoothie cafe, a tire kingdom, a Walgreens building that has been EMPTY for years attracting overnight parking of people sleeping in their cars which now our residents must work with the sheriff's office to move people along. Then you have a strip of 6 residential homes. If you allow this warehouse these residents are directly impacted by not only being crammed between the Publix shopping plaza and its out parcels on their north side, but these homes also now on the south side will have a huge commercial warehouse towering over them, as well as an oversized FPL station, a huge Post Office annex, and large medical building. This area has and is continuing to turn into "that strip where there is 5 in a row" like Commissioner LoCastro saw in his district. We do not need or want a huge warehouse towering the neighborhood in our district. The only wooded area left of our neighborhoods rural beauty and protected by the Golden Gate Master plan is threatened to be taken away by another commercial property on a currently zoned residential lot. With the allowance of this warehouse storage unit, we are not protecting the Environmental stewardship as in OBJECTIVE 2.1- Goal 3 of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. We are not practicing responsible use and preserving the protection of the areas rural character of the natural environment. I ask you please abide by the "Golden Gate Master Plan" for what is left of our rural neighborhood. Follow your plan for District 1 and protect the community of District 3 from haphazard construction, unneeded/unwanted commercial buildings and listen to the voices of the citizens as you all discussed for District 1 back on April 25th, 2023, and NOT approve this massive warehouse in our ever -shrinking bit of acreage that is left in our neighborhood along our portion of the Collier Blvd corridor. StOID the Building of the Warehouse on 13 Ave SW and Collier Blvd Call every Commissioniers: tell them who ,you are and WHY you do not support the Self- Storage Warehouse at 405013th Ave and Collier Blvd. Then email each one and write down WHY you do not support this Building. Rick LoCastro: 239- 252:8601 And email: rick.locastroC@colliercountyfl.gov Chris Hall: 230-252-8602 email: chris.hall@colliercountyfl.gov Burt Sanders: 239-252-8603 email: burt.sanders@colliercountyfl.gov Dan Kowal: 239-252-8604 email: dan.kowal@colliercountXfl.gov Bill McDaniel: 239-252-8605 email: bill.mcdaniel@colliercountvfl.gov These are Some of the REASONS below. Choose anyone you want to give them for the reasons you do not want this Storage or you might have your own reasons. These are the Main Points to be discussed for this Meeting on April 20,2023. 1. As of this memo we have not seen any pictures of the 168,856 sq. ft. storage warehouse. 2. The ingress/egress are one lane in and out from Collier Blvd. This is Illegal! 3. Traveling from South to North there is a left turning lane into 131h Ave SW. Where is the left turning lane going to be when from traveling from South to North to make that turn into the Warehouse? 4. As of a study on April 12, 2023 cars traveling from North to South on Collier Blvd had a count of 6.371. This count was taken between the hours of 6:00 am to 9:OOam. The Building of this Warehouse would be a Safety Hazard 1.This Warehouse will be the Biggest one in Collier County. It is 168,856 Sq. Ft. and will be 4 stories High. It is next to a Massive Florida Power & Light Plant! It is generally not recommended to build a public storage facility near a power plant, as there are potential safety risks and hazards associated with the operation of power plants. This Warehouse is Not needed 1. There is another Warehouse only 3 miles away. It is the Public Storage at City Gate and 75 exit. There are 13 warehouses on Collier Blvd and there are 57 in Collier County. 2. Thirteen Ave SW is Land Locked and no one would be able to get out should anything occur with the Storage and Electric Plant. Pat Lertch If you have any questions please call me at: Home:239-455-2413 Cell: 239-571-2297 email: lertchp@comcast.net If you want to sign The Petition Paper I will be over to Publix Tuesday & Wednesday 4/18 & 4/19. DANGEROUS & CREATES MAJOR TRAFFIC PROBLEMS NORTHBOUND ACCESS Semi Trucks must make a U-Turn at 13th Ave SW. The manuver would require running over a School Bus Stop. Semi trucks require a 45-55' turn radius, the road is only 40' wide. They can not make this turn. Giant United Van J Lines moving trucks - ' SOUTHBOUND ACCESS and self -storage I Semi Trucks must make a wide right customers will be hand turn, blocking several lanes to stopping traffic and turn right into the project. manuvering around the School Bus Stop IF ACCESS MOVED TO 13TH and parents and kids. I Same problems as above, PLUS semi trucks can not turn around on 13th, AUTION semi trucks often get stuck on 13th and must back down the entire road 6 blind past the Bus Stop out into on- CHILDREN coming Collier traffic. BUSIEST and LARGEST#° Self -Storage in all of Collier County - FOUR times the size of Publix - BIGGER than Super Target - 38 feet tall, towering over neighbors � - Owner of Peluso Moving & Storage HOW TO STOP CUBESMAR (United Van Lines) is a part-owner FROM DESTROYING YOUR CAUTION COMMUTE & COMMUNITY I� 4 _ Attend and Speak at the Meetings i F 1 0 WIDE RIGHT / April 20th at 9:00 am - County Planners h TURNS June 13th at 9:00 am - Commissioners 3299 Tamiami Tr E 3rd Floor ! Naples, FL 34112 li Contact the people listed below self stora OUNTY COMMISSIONERS Burt.Sanders@Col ierCountyFL.gov Bil .McDanie @Co ierCountyFL.gov 29) 252-8079 Rick.LoCastro@ColIierCountyPL.gov Chris.Hall@CollierCountyFL.gov Dan.KowaI@ColIierCountyPL.gov OUNTY.PLANNERS Rachel.Hansen@CollierCountyFL.gov Eric.Ortman@CollierCountyFL.gov (239) 252-1442 (239) 252-1032 Stopping the Rezone of the Property at 405013th Ave SW. It's only a money thing to them -But it is a Way of Life for us. I. Insufficient public Disclosure: No renderings or visual depictions of the proposed warehouse provided to the public. The lack of disclosure may violate applicable notice and transparency requirements under local zoning and land use regulations, and it raises concerns about the projects compliance with community planning guidelines and architectural standards. 2. Non -Compliant Ingress /Egress: The warehouse's proposed access design includes only one lane for ingress and egress from Collier Blvd. This arrangement contravenes local traffic and access regulations and poses a significant safety risk to both warehouse employees and nearby residents. 3. Inadequate Traffic Accommodations: The current infrastructure at the proposed site does not account for a turning lane for vehicles traveling from South to North on Collier Blvd. This oversight could lead to increase congestion and safety hazards and may necessitate further review under local traffic impact assessment requirements. 4. Traffic Impact Analysis: A recent study conducted on April 12, 2023 recorded b, 371 Vehicles traveling from North to South on Collier Blvd. between 6:00am and 9:00am. The construction of this warehouse is likely to exacerbate existing traffic problems and may require a comprehensive traffic impact analysis to ensure compliance with local regulations and to identify necessary mitigation measures. 5. Proximity to Florida Power & Light Plant: The proposed warehouse, which would be the largest in Collier County at four stories high, is located adjacent to a Major Florida Power & Light Plant. Building public storage facilities near power plants generally contravenes best practices in land use planning due to the potential safety risks and hazards associated with power plant operations. b. Redundant Development: The existing warehouse inventory in the area which includes 13 warehouses on Collier Blvd and 57 in Collier County, Calls into question the need for additional storage facilities. This overdevelopment may run counter to sustainable land use and community planning principles. 7. Emergency .Access and Egress: The proposed warehouse's landlocked location 13th ave SW poses a significant concern regarding emergency access and egress. Should an incident occur involving the storage facility and the adjacent electric plant, the limited escape routes may impede emergency response efforts and endanger occupants. THEY WANT A 174,000 SF SELF -STORAGE WAREHOUSE ON 5 ACRES AT 4050 13TH AVE SW TOO BIG, TOO DENSE LOCAL RESIDENTS DON'T WANT ANY MORE STORAGE ON COLLIER • This is BIGGER THAN SUPER TARGET on Immokalee Rd (Target is 173,682 SF on 16 acres) • This is FOUR TIMES the size of the PUBLIX at Collier and Pine Ridge (Publix is 45,000 SF on 24 acres) • If built, the mega -structure will be 38 feet tall and the largest self -storage in all of Collier County. U0AP44sr warn —asomw — ,. •, ."' PELUSO MOVER'S RELATIONSHIP TO THE PROJECT WAS NOT DISCLOSED, JOIN YOUR NEIGHBORS! THEY HAVE A LARGE UNITED VAN LINES FLEET OF 70-80' 18 WHEELERS WHICH WOULD ADD AN ENORMOUS AMOUNT OF SEMI TRAFFIC Next Neighborhood Strategy Meeting D .; `_. � THE DEVELOPERS SAY SELF STORAGE IS DESPERATELY WANTED BY OUR NEIGHBORHOOD, YET THEY HID THE REQUIRED PUBLIC NOTICE SIGNS BEHIND UTILITY POLES WHERE NO ONE COULD READ THEM OWIM-e-i. -A� 40A , THE PROJECT'S ENTRANCE REQUIRES A U-TURN AT 13TH, AIMING 18-WHEELERS TOWARDS A BUSY SCHOOL BUS STOP AND HAULTING TRAF- ;: STORAGE UNITS ARE KNOWN AS BEING CRIME HOTSPOTS ATTRACTING ID I E-mail List: LertchP@comcast.net Text: Brooke (239) 784-7307 Whatsapp Group Chat HOW TO STOP CUBESMART FROM DESTROYING YOUR COMMUTE & COMMUNITY ATTEND COUNTY MEETINGS May 18th at 9:oo am County Planners June 13th at 9:oo am - Commissioners 3299 Tamiami Tr E 3rd Floor Naples, FL CONTACT REPRESENTATIVES Rachel.Hansen@CollierCountyFL.gov Eric.Ortman@CollierCountyFL.gov Rachel 239-252-1442 Eric 239-252-1032 County Commissioners 239-2S2-8079 Burt.Sanders@CollierCountyFL.gov Rick.LoCastro@CollierCountyFL.gov Dan.Kowal@CollierCountyFL.gov Bill.McDaniel@CollierCountyFL.gov Chris.Hall@CollierCountyFL.gov SIGN OUR PETITION https://chng.it/sW7A4xwSj REZONING FOR THE BIGGEST WAREHOUSE IN ALL COLLIER COUNTY Would You Want This in Your Neighborhood? There is a pending REZONING REQUEST to place a Storage Warehouse (168,856 SF) on 5+ acres of currently zones Residential/Estate Zoned land. It will be the largest in Collier County, and adjacent to 2 Florida Power & Light Electrical Substations. The REZONING VOTE is scheduled for Thursday. May 18. 2023 at 9:00 at the Collier County Government Complex (3299 East 41 & Airport Road Bldg EL RESIDENTS are OPPOSED to COMMERCIAL REZONING which will also include approval for the building of vet another huge Storage Facility that is NOT NEEDED in the neighborhood: The developers and investors plan to build a 3-Story Building next to the current Electrical Substations on the South West Corner of Collier Blvd and 13th Ave SW. The building will also have a 1-Story portion. The facility will be surrounded by a concrete wall, similar to a Fortress. The drive throughout the Facility would be concrete as well. Building of a warehouse next to an electric facility is highly discouraged. Contents of a Storage -Warehouse make it a very likely combustible scenario with nearly FPL facilities. Constant Moving Van traffic and the removal of trees, shrubs, and natural ground covering will certainly raise the decibel noise volume in the area. We question whether the warehouse is to be located outside of the safety exclusion zone of the substation, considering that pool chemicals and yard fertilizers may be stored in the facility. Throughout the day, our elementary, secondary, and special needs CHILDREN wait for School Bus Pick Ups and Drop Offs on the same corner as the proposed storage warehouse. The one entry for ingress and egress will be on 13th Ave SW making it dangerous for students and residents on this DEAD-END street. Where is a planned "residents" fire exit should the entrance to 13th Ave SW be blocked by Semis, U-Hauls, and Moving Vans? Blockage has occurred in the past when trucks have tried to make U-turns on our narrow street. There was an occasion when their property was damaged by a FP&L Vehicle. The Moving Vans are much larger and would be entering and exiting out of the street right in front of their houses. RESIDENTS WILL BE TRAPPED! The only Outlet for the residents of 13 Ave SW is at the end of the street on Collier Boulevard. Should any disaster occur at this proposed warehouse, families would be blocked in. Residents on 11th Ave SW have the Brooks Shopping Center as an alternate escape. 15th Ave SW familiar have the Post Office Annex for an emergency exit. Neighbors on 13th Ave SW, (which has experienced several fires already) currently have NO OTHER EXIT! Collier County has at least 13 other Warehouses in close proximity. All are built on Commercial Property. The closest existing Public Storage only 2.5 miles south of the proposed site. It has a 90% Capacity filled with an average stay of three days. Consequently, rental traffic could be coming into and out of this facility EVERY THREE DAYS. How frequently will Pelosi Movers (investor) moving vans be turning into and out of the facility? Is that the kind of traffic congestion that residents, as well as Collier Blvd commuters, can expect to experience daily, should the rezoning be approved? Traffic Planner has indicated the Max Vehicles on Collier Blvd to be 3,000. In Reality, a recent count was 6,371 during commuting hours of 6 a.m. to 9 a.m. PLEASE STOP THIS PROPOSAL FOR REZONING TO COMMERICAL AND A HUGH STORAGE WAREHOUSE. Attend the meeting on May 18 or write to: Rachel. Hansen (&CollierCountyFL gov This is the Most Important Meeting you will ever have to attend. The Passing of this Rezone will end the Residential/Estate Neighborhood and put in a Mixed Development Plan for Anything Commercial and Residential Combined. That means All Property from now on will be Open Season for All Commercial Builders to come in and take whatever land they want and Build Apartment Complexes, Warehouses, and Stores in Your Neighborhood. This is in Conflict with The Golden Gates Master Plan. Come and Say NO! P r 1 7 S 11- Z Z y 7 e M a � � � �e r��,�1 � C� �M ec�s'� r/ what are the risks of an electric transmission plant Electric transmission plants, also known as electrical substations or power plants, can pose several risks to human health, safety, and the environment, including: _. Electrical Hazards: Electric transmission plants generate and transmit high -voltage electricity, which can pose a significant risk of electrocution or electrical shock. Exposure to electrical current can cause severe burns, nerve damage, and even death. Fire and Explosion: Electrical substations use transformers and other electrical equipment that can overheat and cause a fire or explosion. The presence of flammable materials or combustible gases near the electrical equipment can increase the risk of fire or explosion. Environmental Contamination: Electric transmission plants may release harmful chemicals and pollutants into the environment, such as PCBs (polychlorinated biphenyls), mercury, and sulfur dioxide. Exposure to these pollutants can cause health problems such as respiratory issues, neurological damage, and cancer. Security Risks: Electric transmission plants are critical infrastructure and maybe vulnerable to physical or cyber attacks, which can cause power outages, damage equipment, or compromise sensitive information. 7. Electromagnetic Radiation: Electric transmission plants emit low -frequency electromagnetic radiation that can pose a risk to human health. Prolonged exposure to this radiation may cause headaches, dizziness, fatigue, and other health problems. Overall, electric transmission plants can pose several risks that require proper management, maintenance, and monitoring to ensure the safety of workers, the public, and the environment. It is essential to follow --,-I - `-'°-ems and regulations to minimize _ Regenerate response J 'SAS GSSO�.__ u .?h'-;' iG , Is it safe to build a public storage facility near a power plant It is generally not recommended to build a public storage facility near a power plant, as there are potential safety risks and hazards associated with the operation of power plants. Power plants can pose a range of risks, including the risk of explosions, fires, and toxic emissions. If a storage facility is located in close proximity to a power plant, it could be at risk of damage or destruction in the event of an accident or disaster at the plant. In addition, power plants often require large amounts of water for cooling purposes, and this water can potentially be contaminated with pollutants or chemicals. If a storage facility relies on groundwater for its operations, it could be at risk of contamination from the power plant. It is important to consider the potential risks and hazards associated with a power plant before building a public storage facility nearby. It may be necessary to conduct a thorough risk assessment and take appropriate safety measures to ensure the safety of the facility and its occupants. <ra 7.......,... i .'?.•E'. (iC': �i`c.il i.(� i fi t: ;�3:».^(. Safi [SC :i i rti:�� {: 1•r'.�!{l;E� fi?S'Ca: it',. y�•r ��i . ... t(ir�l r� Is it safe to build a storage facility near an electrical power plant The safety of building a storage facility near an electrical power plant would depend on a number of factors, including the type of storage facility and the characteristics of the power plant. In general, it is not recommended to build a storage facility for hazardous materials or flammable substances near a power plant, especially if the storage facility is within the plant's safety exclusion zone. This is because power plants can present a number of risks, including the potential for explosions, fires, and toxic releases. However, if the storage facility is for non -hazardous materials, and is located outside of the safety exclusion zone of the power plant, it may be considered safe. It would still be important to conduct a thorough risk assessment to identify any potential hazards and to ensure that appropriate safety measures are put in place to mitigate these risks. In any case, it is recommended to consult with experts in both storage facility design and power plant safety to determine the best course of action for a particular location. ic.-n .l a iyiessad je... vt (.�t:":..1.::'. .�..�'.. iAV �i . ........ 1 „l :• i` O�(.duce irf co.11,1 ' til.for;t Z t ;ilk L 3f.'yt`'c'.. j?Ifji::" ?( Is it safe to store yard fertilizers and pool chemicals near a power plant in Florida Storing yard fertilizers and pool chemicals near a power plant in Florida may not be safe, as these substances can pose a risk of fire, explosion, or chemical release if they come into contact with certain materials or if they are mishandled. It is important to follow proper storage procedures for these chemicals to reduce the risk of accidents. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recommends that these substances be stored in a secure, well -ventilated area away from heat sources, open flames, and other chemicals. They should also be kept in their original containers and labeled properly. Additionally, it is important to be aware of any local regulations or guidelines for storing these chemicals, as well as any specific requirements for the power plant in question. You may want to contact the power plant or a local environmental agency for more information on safe storage practices in your area. Ultimately, it is up to the individual or organization responsible for the storage of these chemicals to ensure that they are handled safely and in compliance with all applicable regulations and guidelines. What are the risks involved in storing yard fertilizers and pool chemical near a electric transmission plant Staring yard fertilizers and pool chemicals near an electric transmission plant can pose several risks, including: Fire Hazard: Fertilizers and pool chemicals are often combustible or reactive when exposed to heat or moisture. Electric transmission plants generate a significant amount of heat, and if there is a spark or fire, it can ignite the chemicals and cause a fire. Toxic Chemical Release: Some fertilizers and pool chemicals contain toxic substances such as chlorine, which can be harmful if released into the environment. If a spill or leak occurs, it could contaminate the air or nearby water sources, endangering both humans and wildlife. _. Explosions: Certain fertilizers and pool chemicals, such as ammonium nitrate, can be explosive under certain conditions. If there is a leak or accident, it could trigger an explosion, which could cause severe damage and injuries. r. Corrosion: Electric transmission plants produce corrosive substances that can damage metal containers used for storing fertilizers and pool chemicals. If the containers become damaged, it can lead to leaks or spills that can cause harm to the environment. Overall, it is essential to follow the recommended guidelines for storing hazardous materials to prevent any risks associated with their storage. It is best to keep these chemicals stored in a safe location away from any potential hazards, including electric transmission plants. May 6, 2023 RE: # PL202200002899 & #PL20210003321 Dear Commissioner: I strongly oppose the amendment to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) proposed by Shamrock Self Storage. The proposed amendment to the 131" Ave SW Commercial Infill Subdistrict" clearly violates every goal listed in the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. The proposed amendment would place the largest building in the entire GGAMP in the middle of a residential neighborhood. This project would attract crime. It does not meet the needs of Golden Gate Estates' residents. It destroys the rural character of the area. It creates dangerous roadway hazards. More importantly, it places at risk the lives of dozens of school children who wait for their school buses at the location of the proposed project. It would be an enormous mistake for you to allow the construction of Collier County's largest storage facility in our wooded, residential neighborhood. If you allow this amendment, the consequences will be felt by residents for decades to come. GGAMP Goal 1 — Health, Safety, and Welfare "To guide land use and public facility decision making and to balance the need to provide basic services with natural resource concerns through a well -planned mix of compatible land uses which ensure the health, safety, welfare, and quality of life of the local residents." Objective 1.4: "Provide a living environment within GGE, which is aesthetically acceptable and protects the quality of life" • The proposed land use would attract crime. - As a former police officer, it was my experience that storage units bring additional crime to neighborhoods where they are located. My experience is supported by numerous studies that establish increased crime rates in areas where storage units are located. Some of the crimes attracted by storage facilities include burglaries, squatting, trespassing, scam businesses, drug labs, and violent crime. • The proposed facility is not aesthetically acceptable. - Given that this building is 3 stories tall and 174,000 square feet in size, it would be wildly inconsistent with other commercial buildings in GGE and would be inconsistent with the rural look of GGE. GGAMP Goal 2 — Serving Needs of Golden Gate Estates Residents "To provide for the limited commercial services and conditional uses for purposes serving the rural needs of Golden Gate Estates residents, shortening vehicular trips, and preserving rural character. " • The project is not needed by Golden Gate Estates residents. — The proposed storage unit does not meet the needs of Golden Gate Estates residents. GGE residents live on large acreage homesites, many of which have outbuildings, large garages, and sheds for their storage needs. Residents are opposed to additional storage units in GGE. The Project would increase vehicular trips. — The partnership that seeks to develop the storage unit is owned, in part, by a national United Van Lines moving company. This company has an existing warehouse off Airport Road and Enterprise Ave, but they are out of storage space. The moving company would be adding a significant amount of 18- wheeler traffic to the area. This relationship to a long -haul moving company was not disclosed to the residents. The project would destroy the rural character of the neighborhood. — This large, industrial style building would be an eyesore in a rural residential setting. It is wildly inconsistent with the rural look that the GGAMP defines as one of its goals. GGAMP Goal 3 — Preserving Rural Character "To preserve the area's rural character, as defined by large, wooded lots, the keeping of livestock, the ability to grow crops, wildlife activity, environmental stewardship, low -density residential development, and limitations on commercial and conditional uses." Policy 3.2.3: "Rural character shall be further protected by resisting site -specific Master Plan changes that are out of scale or character with the rural quality of the Urban Golden Gate Estates" The project would eliminate a large, wooded lot. —Numerous trees would be clearcut to make way for the storage unit project. We should not trade acreage lots for industrial warehouses, this is incompatible with Goal 3 of the GGAMP. The project would destroy wildlife activity. — The Environmental Report shows that there are protected and threatened species on the building site, including gopher tortoises and cypress trees. The project would throw out limitations on commercial uses. - There are currently 5 commercial subdistricts with the GGAMP which limit commercial use for important and essential services. Four are consistent with GGAMP (schools, grocery anchored centers, gas stations, hospitals, etc.). The fifth (at Pine Ridge and 1-75) is not governed by the Master Plan. The other commercial subdistricts provide essential services. None of the other commercial subdistricts feature storage units, industrial warehouses, or industrial style buildings. The project would be out of scale with residential buildings in the neighborhood. — The proposed 175,000 square foot project would place the largest storage facility in the entire county on a rural residential street. The proposal is much too large and out of scale with surrounding land uses. It is also dramatically more dense than other developments. Situated on only 5 acres, it would be by far the most intense site in the GGAMP. o Bigger than Super Target on Immokalee Rd (Target is 173,682 SF on 16 acres) o Four times the size of the Publix at Collier and Pine Ridge (Publix is 45,000 SF on 24 acres) o Eight times the size of Temple Shalom's expansion on Pine Ridge o Largest building in the entire GGAMP on a relatively small residential lot. • The project would be out of character with the surrounding neighborhood. — This would be the only industrial warehouse within the Master Plan. The architecture of storage facilities is not consistent with the GGAMP There are also no other similarities between this and the other five commercial subdistricts. This proposed project is not located on the fringes of the district. Instead, it would be placed right in the middle of the district, amongst residential homes. It would be the first industrial building of its kind in GGE. GGAMP Goal 4 — Safe & Efficient Roadways "To provide for a safe and efficient county and local roadway network, while at the same time seeking to preserve the rural character of Golden Gate Estates in the future transportation improvements within the Golden Gate area." The project puts school children in extreme danger at their bus stop. — The proposed storage unit would be located at the exact spot where a school bus stop is located. This bus stop has been located there for more than 30 years. Elementary, middle, and high school students all share the same bus stop. School buses stop there six times per day. Children line up at the corner of 13th Avenue SW and Collier Boulevard to wait for their buses. Regardless of where the driveway for this storage unit will be located, the large moving trucks coming into this facility will either be making a wide right turn onto 13th Ave SW, or a U-turn on Collier Blvd. Under both scenarios, the large moving trucks will encroach on the exact spot where children line up for their school buses. This would cause extreme safety issues which are inconsistent with goal 4 above. Please see the attached drawing to better explain the dangers the schoolchildren will be put in. The project would bring traffic to a standstill. — Because of the inadequate space on the roadway, 18-wheelers that are making a U-turn would have to make a 3-point turn on Collier, which would back up all southbound traffic on Collier Blvd. The road is approximately 40 feet wide, while 18-wheelers range from 70-80 feet long and require a bare minimum of 55 feet to perform a U-turn maneuver. The small-scale traffic study was not adequate. — Because the developer claims there will be less than 50 vehicle trips to the project per day, they only paid for a Small - Scale traffic study. The study does not mention that the project will cater to 18-wheelers or that the developers will partner with a moving and storage company. The study does not mention or deal with the limited space and traffic implications for U-Turns or wide right turns. It also fails to mention the school bus stop located at the development site. GGAMP Goal 5 — Protecting Lives & Property "To protect the lives and property of the residents of the Urban Golden Gate Area, as well as the health of the natural environment, through the provision of emergency services that prepare for, mitigate, and respond to, natural and man-made disasters. Objective 5.1: "Coordinate with local emergency service officials and engineering in constructing road improvements within Urban Golden Gate Estates to ensure that the access needs of fire department, police, and emergency management personnel and vehicles are met. " The project would violate traffic access regulations. - The warehouse's proposed access design includes only one lane for ingress and egress. This arrangement is incompatible with local traffic and access regulations and proposes a significant safety risk for warehouse employees and nearby residents. The project could block emergency access. — The proposed project would require 18- wheelers to make three-point U-Turns on Collier Boulevard and wide right turns onto 13th Avenue SW to access the project. This would create significant traffic problems and could slow down or prevent emergency vehicles from traveling on Collier Blvd. Dangers to School Children Waiting at Bus Stop (to scale): • Even with a Bulb -Out, the trucks will still get within inches of children • Currently Fire Trucks can not make this U-Turn without doing a 3-point turn • Semi trucks get stuck on 13th Ave and have to back out onto Collier Blvd to get out, stopping all southbound traffic on Collier Blvd Y scn05` i Vi ' ?6 G � E .•v 11 From: Patti Raco <patti.raco@gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, May 6, 2023 3:14 PM To: HansenRachel Subject: Re zoning of 13th Ave SW Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Rachel, I know you've heard from me before but I feel I need make sure that I drive this opposition home. Here are some of the reasons why this is not a good spot for this massive invasive building; - COMMERCIAL is not currently allowed- This is Zoned Estates Single Family with Permitted Uses. - 174,000 Sq. Ft of Building space requested is the Same Size as a TARGET! May be as high as 3 stories tall - COMMERCIAL IS allowed in scattered designated "Neighborhood Centers" elsewhere not here on 13th Ave Sw. - Very few Jobs created by Storage Units- what purpose does it serve other than looking awful. - Only 6% Native vegetation preserved - Listed Species are Present Onsite (State Protected Gopher Tortoise) and could otherwise be avoided with current zoning use (house, church, etc.) - Neighboring properties to the north are Residential - FPL Essential Service is on West and South Side and is Preferred USE over Commercial/Industrial - Storage Facilities are Industrial Zoning and Bring Property Values Down and can lead to crime, no one wants to bring our property values down- would you want that in your neighborhood?? - Noise, Light, Traffic increases - Children's Bus Stop is located at the Corner and Unsafe - Our Community's Master Plan has outlined our priorities are to keep our neighborhood Quiet, Natural, and Rural. - The County Currently Allows Permitted Uses that Benefit the Community such as Churches, Daycare Facilities, Essential Services. These current uses should be explored. - Storage Facilities are not Desirable to the Community. Lee County is considering a Moratorium on all new Storage Facility Construction, Collier county needs this moratorium as wellH -Allowing Developers to Change Zoning Now opens the FLOOD GATES to properties ALL throughout Golden Gate Estates. - Rules require the Developer to demonstrate a benefit to the community before approval. A storage Facility does not serve the community. Golden Gate Estates has plenty of room to store items, we are allowed barns, sheds, and guest houses. All the Best Patti Raco-Treamer From: CONSTANZA HERNANDEZ <mchm00@hotmail.com> Sent: Saturday, May 6, 2023 5:57 PM To: HansenRachel Subject: Shamrock self storage Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Rachel.Hansen@ColIierCountVFL.gov RE: SHAMROCK SELF STORAGE (PL20220000289 & PL20210003321) I am sending this letter in opposition to build a huge self storage building on 13th ave sw. Below are the reasons why it should not happen 1. COMMERCIAL is not currently allowed- This is Zoned Estates Single Family with Permitted Uses. When we bought out property in 2015 it was residential for single families. 2 . 174,000 Sq. Ft of Building space requested is the Same Size as a TARGET! May be as high as 3 stories tall , it will be a huge visual and environmental impact. 3 . COMMERCIAL IS allowed in scattered designated "Neighborhood Centers" elsewhere, not in this specific spot. 4 . Very few Jobs created by Storage Units, this are operated by computers and dont need real people to work in it. 5. Only 6% Native vegetation preserved, all the vegetation is going to be destroyed to build the storage. 6. These are the Listed Species are Present Onsite : State Protected Gopher Tortoises , owls, bees and could otherwise be avoided with current zoning use houses, daycare, church. 7. Neighboring properties to the north are Residential not commercial 8 . FPL Essential Service is on West and South Side and is Preferred USE over Commercial/Industrial which is the category of the self storage) 9. Storage Facilities are Industrial Zoning and Bring Property Values Down because nobody will buy a house on the street if there is a selfstorage at the end of the street and can lead to crime bodies are been found in storage lately and since there is not gate nor control who goes in and out can lead to people sleep inside the units. 10. A lot of noise, increment in Light, and Traffic increases 11 . There are 8 times that the Children's school Bus Stop at the corner, elementary @ 7:24 am and 3:34pm, middle at 8:24 and 4:34 , high school 6:32 am and 2:34 pm , and special need route at 7:30 am and 3:30 pm , its Unsafe for the kids and the traffic is already bad around that time. 12. Our Community's Master Plan has outlined our priorities are to keep our neighborhood Quiet, Natural, and Rural, and we want to keep it that way. 13. The County Currently Allows Permitted Uses that Benefit the Community such as Churches, Daycare Facilities, Essential Services. These current uses should be explored. 14. Storage Facilities are not Desirable to the Community. Lee County is considering a Moratorium on all new Storage Facility Construction. 15. Allowing Developers to Change Zoning Now opens the FLOOD GATES to properties ALL throughout Golden Gate Estates and that should not happen. 16. Rules require the Developer to demonstrate a benefit to the community before approval. A storage Facility does not serve the community. Golden Gate Estates has plenty of room to store items, we are allowed barns, sheds, and guest houses. 17. There is a cube smart storage on vanderbilt and collier, another on collier and Immokalee, how many more do we need? There are plenty all over collier boulevard. 18 . The location collier and 13th ave sw is very close to 175 which is a desirable way to scape when criminals leave collier county, it will be super easy robbers to come to the wear house and take 175 and scape to Miami. My name is Maria C Hernandez and I am a resident/owner of a house on 13th ave sw. Sent from my Whone From: AOL <shirleysun278@aol.com> Sent: Sunday, May 7, 2023 1:34 PM To: HansenRachel Subject: Shamrock Self Storage PL20220000289 & PL20210003321 Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Shirley Lytwyn shirleysun278 .aol.com -----Original Message ----- From: MAILER -DAEMON aaaol.com To: shirleysun278(a)aol.com Sent: Sun, May 7, 2023 1:30 pm Subject: Failure Notice Sorry, we were unable to deliver your message to the following address. <Rachel. Hansen(a)ColllierCountyFL.gov>: No mx record found for domain=collliercountyfl.gov ---------- Forwarded message ---------- This is not a good thing for our Community because of the following 1. FPL Essential Service is on the West and South Side and is Preferred USE over Commercial/Industrial 2. Storage Facilities are Industrial Zoning and Bring Property Values Down and can lead to crime. 3. Rules require the Developer to demonstrate a benefit to the community before approval. 4. Collier Blvd is busy enough we don't need this to create more traffic in our area. Thank you, Shirley Lytwyn shirleysun2786c�aol.com EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Dear Commissioners, May 8,2023 I am writing on behalf of myself and neighbors in strong opposition to the proposed mega -warehouse on 13th Ave SW. The development fails to meet every goal of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP). An out-of-state builder is hoping our leaders push aside our community's long -upheld development standards to make a special exception for an unnecessary, unwanted, non -beneficial, and unsafe use in the middle of a wooded acreage home -site neighborhood. We ask that you deny all of their applications and requests based on the following reasons: 1. GGAMP Goal 1 promotes the "health, safety, and welfare" of Golden Gate Estates (GGE) residents. CubeSmart facilities have a long track record of attracting crime and fires. A fire next door to Collier County's only FPL Service Center presents a serious county -wide risk. (See pages 2-3) 2. GGAMP Goal 2 requires development to "serve the needs of residents" Our community is in unison that storage units are not needed or wanted by the thousands of residents in the GGAMP area. (See pages 4-5) 3. GGAMP Goal 3 seeks to "preserve the rural character" while CubeSmart / Shamrock's warehouse is dramatically out of scale for the estates. A 175,000 sf footprint is larger Super Target. (See pages 6-7) 4. GGAMP Goal 4 mandates "a safe and efficient road network'; but the project's poor location will bring southbound traffic on Collier Blvd to a standstill as semi -trucks attempt to make 3 or 4 point turns on one of our most critical north / south roadways. (See pages 8-9) 5. GGAMP Goal 5 states the high level of importance of "preserving lives" and "improving emergency response" while CubeSmart's plan turns the corner of 13th Ave SW and Collier Blvd into a death trap for school children while simultaneously slowing emergency response times to all Collier residents. (See pages 10-11) 6. Shamrock Builders has a pattern of presenting attractive renderings, then failing to deliver on those promises made to county officials and neighbors. Their landscaping plans are greatly exaggerated as evidenced in this packet. (See pages 12-15) 7. Lastly, Shamrock Builders has been hiding critical details about their plans. Their work is incompatible and incongruent with typical Naples design. Their lackluster buildings speak for themselves. (See pages 16-17) The benefits of self storage to the residents of Golden Gate Estates are far outweighed by the risks to the entire county. The only entities this project stands to benefit are a NYSE corporation and a mediocre out-of- state builder. The Golden Gate Estates community stands firmly against the proposed project and requests that you take all steps necessary to stop the radical transformation of our wooded, residential neighborhood into a heavy commercial warehouse zone. On behalf of your constituents and community, we appreciate your careful consideration and request that you please deny any and all of Shamrock Builders and CubeSmart's applications. SincetRh Angitch ResiAve SW Page 1 GGAMP GOAL 1 - SAFETY & WELFARE PROVIDE BASIC SERVICES WITH NATURAL RESOURCE CONCERNS THROUGH A WELL -PLANNED MIX OF COMPATIBLE LAND USES WHICH ENSURE THE HEALTH, SAFETY, WELFARE, AND QUALITY OF LIFE OF THE LOCAL RESIDENTS Shamrock's plans are incompatible with the land use guidelines in Goal 1 of the GGAMP. Storage facilities are known to attract crime, degrade natural resources, increase fire hazards, and erode the quality of life of local residents. Shamrock / CubeSmart is hoping Collier County's leaders will ignore the health, safety, and welfare of the residents they represent. Even SpareFoot.com tells potential storage unit customers, "The best thing you can do to protect your belongings at the storage facility is to purchase insurance for your items" In other words, you are going to need insurance, because self storage isn't safe. INCREASES CRIME IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD In a report by the National Insurance Crime Bureau (NICB), theft from storage units has been on the rise in recent years, with an estimated $1 billion in losses. CubeSmart's business model depends on a minimum number of employees with only half of CubeSmart workers residing on -site. With unattended valuables inside, criminals know these are soft targets and discreet places to conduct crimes. Murder, arson, human trafficking, drug manufacturing, squatting, hazardous waste storage, and illegal businesses are common at storage facilities. The developer has stated there will be one employee on site during business hours. It is unreasonable to expect one employee to run a rental office and patrol a mega -structure that is larger than the Naples Super Target for 24 hours a day. RISKS COLLIER COUNTY'S CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE Storage unit users often break the terms of service. Some people live in the units, while other units are found storing flammable chemicals or operating businesses. Storage units have been turned into meth labs, unlicensed boat / auto repair shops, lawn -care businesses, and even homes. Each of these uses increases the risk of a serious fire. The only FPL Service Center in all of Collier County and FPL's large fleet of repair trucks would be parked adjacent to this dangerous use. The power generated here serves thousands of homes, hospitals, traffic lights and other critical infrastructure. If FPL is damaged, it would take months, if not years to rebuild and repair the station to bring services back on-line. The benefits of self storage to the residents of Golden Gate Estates are far outweighed by the risks to the entire county. Woman identified after allegedly being locked in storage unit with dog before fatal fire by VICTORIA HILL I KJN I Tue, February21 s 2023, 2:34 PM EST O WOMAN & DOG MURDERED AT CUBESMART `My life has been taken': St. Pete woman's items stolen as storage unit thefts are on the rise Storage unit thefts are up not just in the Bay area, but nationwide. Page 2 MAJOR CRIMES AT STORAGE UNITS IN THE LASTgo DAYS Main Arrested Following 6-Hour Standoff at Hilo, Hlr Self -Storage Facility MAY 05. 2023 Policeamuso-d a man on Tuesday after a six -hour standoff at StorQUe5t Self Storage in H llot Hawa ll, A second... 3 Men Face Felony Charges After Fleeing the Scene of a Shawnee, KS, Self -Storage Theft APR 25. 2023 Three rnen are! facing felony Charges after fleeing the scene of Shawnee. Kansas, self -storage burglary last__ Arrest Made in Case of 2 Bodies Found in Brighton, MA. Self -Storage Unit AIPR 18. 2022 Police have arrested a mark in connection with two bodies that were found inside a Brighton, Massachusetts, self - storage unit on Friday. April 14. The defendant rented the space at iStDrage under one of the vlctlm's names. accord Ing to sources... Body of Man Missing !nce December 2019 Found in 8row nsburL IN, Self -Storage Unit APR 10. 2 3 Update 4li0123 - Jeremy Farmer this week was found guilty by a Jury for shooting and killing his father. Roger Farmer. in 2019. He'll be sentenced on April 28, according to the source... Akan Arrested for Arson After 'Fire at Pensac* Ia. FL, Self -Storage Facility MAR 29, 2023 A man ha-5 been arrested in Wrinealon with a fire last Week at a Pensacola, Roridd. Self -Storage faCllity_ Two Units at Prime Storage at 1130 W. 9 Mile Road we re destroyed by the ThoMay morning Inferno. and elght others had smoke. related damage... Charges Dropped In Case of Decomposing Body Found In Maquon, IL, Self -Storage Unit MAR 21, 2D23 Update 3121123 - judge Andrew Doyle ordered the prosecution to drop several rate charges, including murder and aMernpW murder, in K5 w5e ago in5t e54y bew u5e they impeded ;he 5u5pi � qhC to a speedy trial. Charges added in February In.., Source: https://www.insideselfstorage.com/risk-management/crime O. Iss ul Page 3 GGAMP Goal 2 - Serving Needs of Residents "TO PROVIDE FOR THE LIMITED COMMERCIAL SERVICES AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR PURPOSES SERVING THE RURAL NEEDS OF GOLDEN GATE ESTATES RESIDENTS, SHORTENING VEHICULAR TRIPS, AND PRESERVING RURAL CHARACTER. Shamrock's plans are incompatible with Goal 2 of the GGAMP. Storage facilities are not wanted or needed by the residents of Golden Gate Estates. There is a surplus of storage while demand is declining. Between June 2021 and January 2023 occupancy rates plummeted from 87.5% to 82.5% while rental rates dropped by 19% per unit. In the 4Q2022, there were more move -outs than move -ins in storage facilities. Local storage companies have plenty of available space. (Source: SpareFoot.com) GOLDEN GATE ESTATES RESIDENTS DON'T HAVE A NEED FOR STORAGE In the immediate area, typical lots range from 1 to 5 acres. Most homes have large garages, storage sheds, barns, workshops, and quonset huts to accommodate their storage needs. Additionally, storage unit facilities with plenty of vacancy can be found just a short drive away. INCREASES TRAFFIC TO THE AREA The developers stated in the NIM that they don't know the total number of storage units or average size of the units they plan to build. If they don't know the number of units, how can they conduct a truthful traffic study? They checked a box that indicated there would be less than 25 trips per day, so they were not required to do a real study. The innadequate traffic study provided to the Planning Department ignored the impossibility of 18-wheelers making U-turns at 13th Ave SW, Pine Ridge, or Green Blvd. It also failed to mention out -of -area renters, school bus stops, and the total number of storage units. In their annual report, CubeSmart's average storage unit size in their Florida assets is 104 square feet (SO while their newly built assets average 94 sf per unit at those locations. Expect 1,700 individual storage units at this location. Depending on the unit mix, there could be as many as 6,000 individual units if smaller units are prioritized. The developers plan to increase unnecessary traffic to the area and are hiding important decision -making data from Collier County leaders and neighborhoods. Users of the facilities would be from apartments and condos west of I-75, not residents of Golden Gate Estates. With Great Wolf Lodge, Big Shots Golf, a lengthening of Collier Blvd to Lee County, and more housing planned, the added storage traffic is incompatible. DIMINISHES THE RURAL CHARACTER OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD Industrial uses are banned by the GGAMP for good reason. These warehouses transform quaint, wooded, rural neighborhoods to crime -ridden industrial zones that clash with the character of Golden Gate Estates. CubeSmart's branding is completely incompatible with the rural character of the area. Page 4 SELF STORAGE SATURATION- RESIDENTS DON'T WANT ANY MORE k EL .. 'S PubJisr Super market fat.The 'LLGl13FBf • • 1 1 Ps� Public Storage, Nwh Naples I I Storage vineyards tee. Hideaway ` 0 rage - Naples LifeStorage R. v� W IS Z60 at Hideaway St, Storage rdens % ,I IIII I I /14 kingILL\I/ E8I self star Golden Gate i 1 S-Na I) Tr$IlS Bonita Bay Club Naples Bravo NGALA wildlife Preserve 9 O ti� � ; iri Apartrnents Life Storage sicrans Reg] (;III' 15Ivd LifeSto_ rage •► Verona walk Lely Resort Lo� Page 5 GGAMP GOAL 3 - RURAL CHARACTER & LOW DENSITY TO PRESERVE THE AREA'S RURAL CHARACTER, AS DEFINED BY LARGE, WOODED LOTS, THE KEEP- ING OF LIVESTOCK, THE ABILITY TO GROW CROPS, WILDLIFE ACTIVITY, ENVIRONMENTAL STEW- ARDSHIP, LOW -DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, AND LIMITATIONS ON COMMERCIAL AND CONDITIONAL USES. Shamrock's plans are inconsistent with Goal 3 of the GGAMP. Shamrock's plan is for an ominous, windowless, eyesore which detracts from the rural character of our community. Shamrock / CubeSmart think they can convince county leaders that a 38' tall, 175,000 sf box can be hidden with a few palm trees and shrubs, this is intentionally misleading as evidenced by their completed projects and other buildings. MOST INTENSE DEVELOPMENT SITE IN THE GGAMP The proposed site intensity is 175,000 sf of storage on just 5 acres. If approved, this would be the most intense industrial site in all of Collier County and by far the largest building in the GGAMP. It would also be the largest and busiest storage facility in Collier County. The buildings pictured on the following page are smaller in size and far less dense, averaging 7,500 sf per acre. The proposed CubeSmart would be 35,000 sf per acre. The busy, high -density commercialized use would be appropriate in an urban metropolis, but it would put enormous stain on the character of the Estates and Naples alike. It is wholly incompatible. DESTROY WOODS FOR HIGH DENSITY STORAGE Trading in a wooded residential lot for a massively disproportionate and architecturally challenged industrial storage project is in direct opposition to the GGAMP. The proposal, is incompatible with the GGAMP and could create a domino effect, turning homes into warehouses along Collier Blvd. IGNORES COMMERCIAL LIMITATIONS While exceptions to the GGAMP have been granted, they have been for welcomed essential services and serve as a benefit to the Golden Gate Estates community. Hospital facilities, grocery stores, and utilities projects have been approved. Residents appreciate the need for these uses. However, residents of Golden Gate Estates do not need or want storage, nor is storage considered an essential service. Not one commercial subdistrict in the GGAMP allows for any industrial use or storage space. While others have respectfully played by the rules Shamrock / Cube Smart thinks they can convince our leaders to make a COLLIER SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATION - 150,000 SF ON 12 ACRES Page 6 COLLIER MEGA -STRUCTURES SMALLER THAN PROPOSED STORAGE o rr � �■r RAA son AMAZON DISTRIBUTION CENTER IN NAPLES - 112,000 SF ON 18 ACRES NAPLES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL DOWNTOWN - 143,000 SF ON 16 ACRES WATERSIDE SHOPS IN NAPLES - 150,000 SF ON 34 ACRES SUPER TARGET IN NORTH NAPLES - 173,000 SF ON 16 ACRES Page 7 GGAMP GOAL 4 - SAFE ROADS TO PROVIDE FOR A SAFE AND EFFICIENT COUNTY AND LOCAL ROADWAY NETWORK, WHILE AT THE SAME TIME SEEKING TO PRESERVE THE RURAL CHARACTER OF GOLDEN GATE ESTATES IN THE FUTURE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE GOLDEN GATE AREA. No matter where the entrance is placed (on 13th or Collier) Shamrock's plans are incompatible with the "safe and efficient roadway network" benchmarks listed in Goal 4 of the GGAMP. Catering to 18-wheelers presents extreme dangers to children, drivers, and pedestrians while slowing traffic. UNDISCLOSED PARTNERSHIP WITH PELUSO MOVERS / UNITED VAN LINES The facility is specifically designed to cater to 18-wheelers. Peluso Mover's owner is a partner in the project. Neighbors were told no businesses would be allowed to operate at this location, but the fact is that Peluso Mover's owner is in desperate need of additional storage space and is a part owner. This information was hidden from the neighbors, we may have been lied to at the NIM. This is not your typical self -storage project for people in between homes, this has an industrial corporate storage component they are trying to hide. The designs call for a drive -through loading access plan that is designed to accommodate and cater to the needs of 18-wheelers, all while failing to provide logical plans for 18-wheelers to enter and exit the site. NO PLACE TO TURN 18 wheelers regularly get stuck on 13th Ave SW. Looking for a cut through route or a safe place to make a U-turn, truck drivers soon learn there are no options. 13th Ave SW routinely has 18-wheelers backing down the entire length of 13th Ave SW dodging children walking to school, vehicles in both directions, and people walking their dogs. An 18-wheeler driver's only option is to back up onto Collier Blvd, stopping traffic. Trucks can not safely make the wide right turn from Collier or the U-turn at 13th. VELUSO 1V10VER S UNITED VAN LINES I Page 8 TURNS COLLIER BLVD INTO A SLOW AND DANGEROUS ROAD • Giant United Van _ Lines moving trucks _ I` DANGEROUS & CREATES -' and self -storage MAJOR TRAFFIC PROBLEMS customers will be ' ` stopping traffic and NORTHBOUND ACCESS maneuvering around .i' i Semi Trucks must make a U-Turn at 1 the School Bus Stop 13th Ave SW. The maneuver would re- * r and parents and kids. _ quire running over a School Bus Stop. Semi trucks require a 55' turn radius, �! , - the road is only 40' wide. They can not AUTION 90SCHOOLBUS m make this turn, even with a "bulb -out" Cl it still puts school children in harms — CHILDREN way. I a — — — — — — — — —- SOUTHBOUND ACCESS I9 Semi Trucks must make a wide right 3 ' hand turn, blocking several lanes to turn right into the project. v n /=E , •, IF ACCESS MOVED TO 13TH Same as above, PLUS semi problems trucks can not turn around on 13th, CAUTION J semi trucks often get stuck on 13th and must back down the entire road blind past the Bus Stop out into on - WIDE TURNSHT — - coming Collier traffic. _ 1 y self stor Ir 7+ ti 1. I I } t 4 F - � Page 9 GGAMP GOAL 5 - PROTECTING LIVES TO PROTECT THE LIVES AND PROPERTY OF THE RESIDENTS OF THE URBAN GOLDEN GATE AREA, AS WELL AS THE HEALTH OF THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT, THROUGH THE PROVISION OF EMER- GENCY SERVICES THAT PREPARE FOR, MITIGATE, AND RESPOND TO, NATURAL AND MAN-MADE DISASTERS. BUSY SCHOOL BUS STOP IN THE CROSS -HAIRS OF HEAVY TRUCKS The school bus stop at 13th Ave SW has been around for at least 35 years and is extremely busy. There are at least 6 pickups per day serving busloads of children from Kindergarten all the way through high school. A developer planning to have the largest vehicles on our roads aimed at and maneuvering over and around our community's most precious and vulnerable residents is completely incompatible with the GGAMP. Construction of the site would also bring unnecessary risks to children at the bus stop. Dodging concrete trucks, bulldozers, forklifts, cranes, and heavy machinery crossing over the bus stop area would be a daily reality for children for the year -long duration of construction. Shamrock is hoping our community leaders will ignore the risks to schoolchildren and approve their grossly negligent plans. Even with adjustment or widening of the road with an added lane or bulb -out, there will still be an increased risk to school children. Seasoned truck drivers with CDL's will have to do advanced maneuvers to turn around utilizing a 3 or 4 point turn and halting southbound traffic. The project will also attract inexperienced drivers who are attempting to turn U-Haul moving trucks, rented or borrowed trailers, and large pickup trucks all while dodging children and forcing children to jump out of the way of the most dangerous vehicles on the roadways. This proposal isn't protecting any lives, it is putting lives in grave danger so it absolutely can not be approved based on the GGAMP's most important goal: "protecting lives': DELAYED EMERGENCY RESPONSE Traffic backups, accidents, 3 or 4-point turns, and advanced maneuvers will slow emergency response times for police, fire, and EMS. Our closest fire station is to the south, fire trucks would have to do a dangerous 3-point turn to respond to an emergency at this location. This puts all residents and visitors lives in danger. Goal 5 is written to improve emergency response, not to make those response times worse. RISKS FPL'S HURRICANE RESPONSE FPL's fleet of emergency response trucks is located immediately adjacent to the site. A fire or incident at the storage facility could damage critical infrastructure as well as FPL's emergency repair fleet, creating lags in response time county -wide from FPL. Without easy access to the site Collier Fire's response would also be delayed. Page 10 #7 f N 3 3 > •Y a a y •. k ,,Ap f C ' • • •Neighborhood Center NON"ESSENTIAL SubdistrictI Utilities Center . C5 HEAVY Subdistrict FPL Service MIMM 1 yTransformer � CommERCIA Response & -. .. .. H Station Publix. ' 2 q" f 3-- y M y LO A, ; x }} x ^' � y ~ 6s yr' �N '• �. S IA 146- - fr }" iF - - r $ F - r �^- "° •�° � . � r � as '� � .. v " , OF 41W JA DEVELOPERS RENDERINGS HISTORICALLY MISLEADING Both Shamrock and CubeSmart have demonstrated a pattern of providing renderings to county leaders and neighborhoods, and then failing to deliver expected results. Explore the misleading renderings which led to aesthetically offensive developments that deviate from promises made to communities. The best indicator of future performance is past performance. These out-of-state developers just don't care. SHAMROCK STORAGE - LANDSCAPING PROMISED, BUT NOT DELIVERED - Built by Shamrock Storage in Ann Arbor, MI - Clear misrepresentation of landscaping plan, many trees and shrubs uninstalled RENDERING PRESENTED TO COMMUNITY ACTUAL COMPLETED PROJECT - NO LANDSCAPING Page 12 SHAMROCK STORAGE - LANDSCAPING PROMISED, BUT NOT DELIVERED - Built by Shamrock Storage in Cleveland, OH Clear misrepresentation of landscaping plan, the only landscaping is one dead tree RENDERING PRESENTED TO COMMUNITY i L 1 - - I M dfmatc coMrclled AC;TUAT, C.OMPURTED PROTECT - No LANDSC;APTNG Page 13 CUBESMART - LANDSCAPING PROMISED TO NAPLES, PARTIAL DELIVERY - Clear misrepresentation of architecture, landscaping, and design by CubeSmart - Valley Stream Drive CubeSmart off Rattlesnake Hammock & Tamiami Tr Kim u �►�� Fp k ►Cly.''y' - CUBE ART 4 rnq self tOrdy6 --�F si i➢� �� ow �. on . C. ii ACTUAL COMPLETED PROJECT Page 14 SHAMROCK / CUBESMART - LANDSCAPING PROMISED TO 13TH AVE SW - Based on Shamrock's past performance, we shouldn't expect this landscaping - Renderings presented do not show the actual storage building designs, just trees SAME VANTAGE POINT AS THE RENDERING Page 15 AWFUL ARCHITECTURE, CATERS TO 18-WHEELERS SHAMROCKS COMPLETED STORAGE CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS - Designed for 18 wheelers and moving companies with "Drive-Thru Loading" - Prison -like architecture theme is inconsistent with other buildings in Naples Page 16 MISLEADING "SITE PLAN" AND "RENDERING" PROVIDED TO NEIGHBORS - Inadequate site plan / renderings provided, we have no clue what it will look like - No building height, no unit mix, no renderings of storage buildings, no finishes - Hid partnership with major national moving company United Van Lines / Peluso - Why is Shamrock keeping all of this information from the county and neighbors? - Why should we make special exceptions for these disingenuous developers? lQ FPLC#F WRE UFIUTe WEPAENT ' (OR 5452. K 1 T44) M.N.55' SEIHhCK I I I � 75' ND'YY I I IFJSEki91T i I I I 13R 7D&; F'G 3Dfy1 I I I I I II III I I I i 'I ICI I I II I I I I I \ I II I I I I �I �IH I I 3U1FFL J 9D'FPL LWT IFJi3F.1ENT I OR 54SZ, ' {OR 545x I Frti 17M PG 17W I II I I GD' ROPLM1YAY I I EFSEM'. III (ae7, Pa15} 1 I /I. I/m SIDEWALK w•1�rl�IFI EhH.WCFD II I 911FFER L W PROPOSED RCM OOMPENSiMN FOR TURN LAh= TE *5 ;AZ • + {{III II 11 ` DIA I MA 2h Page 17 From: EDUARDO MARQUES <portmar@aol.com> Sent: Sunday, May 7, 2023 9:23 PM To: HansenRachel Subject: 13th Ave Rezone Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Sent from my iPhone Eduardo Marques 4695 13th Ave Sw Naples FL 34116 vote No to Storage Unit on 13th ave sw This not going to benefit the resident that live on this street or around, we already have enough with the FPL Power Plant. In my opinion, and some resources I read is no safe to build a storage next to a power plant one of the reasons you don't know what people store in there and most of this people are not living in this area or out of state. How many storages do we need on Collier Blvd ? You got one on almost every mile example by paradise Coast, Vanderbilt Road, Immokalee Road and also a few more on away to Marco Island. The traffic is already very heavy. We don't need more traffic here From: Dustin Espinosa <dustin.espinosa@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2023 4:47 PM To: HansenRachel Subject: Opposing rezone EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Hi Rachel, My name is Dustin Espinosa and I'm from 4319 13th Ave SW. I'm not sure I can make it to the 5/18 warehouse meeting but wanted to get in writing that I'm opposed to the rezoning. Best wishes, Dustin From: Costy Watts <wattscosty@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2023 5:33 PM To: HansenRachel Subject: NOT rezone on 13th ave sw Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Rachel.Hansen@CollierCountyFL.gov RE: SHAMROCK SELF STORAGE (PL20220000289 & PL20210003321) These are the reasons that as a resident and owner of 13th ave sw , me and the rest of the neighbors are opposing the construction of the self storage in our street. Below is the list of POINTS ON WHY OPPOSE 1. COMMERCIAL is not currently allowed- This is Zoned Estates Single Family with Permitted Uses, when we bought our property it was Residential, we been here for 8+ years and we love our family oriented neighborhood 2. 174,000 Sq. Ft of Building space requested is the Same Size as a TARGET! May be as high as 3 stories tall , that will be a huge impact for the vegetation and the environment with all the deforestation along with the construction 3. COMMERCIAL IS allowed in scattered designated "Neighborhood Centers" elsewhere but not on 13th ave sw. 4. Very few Jobs created by Storage Units since they are self service, NO security guards or patrolling 5. Only 6% Native vegetation preserved And Listed Species are Present Onsite (State Protected Gopher Tortoise) and could otherwise be avoided with current zoning use (house, church, etc.) 7. Neighboring properties to the north are Residential NOt commercial 8. FPL Essential Service is on West and South Side and is Preferred USE over Commercial/Industrial 9. Storage Facilities are Industrial Zoning and Bring Property Values Down and can lead to crime, we are very close to 175 which is an easy target for bad people coming and going to Miami 10. And increase in Noise, Light, Traffic 11. Children's Bus Stop is located at the Corner and is Unsafe for the kids, the traffic is already bad with 8 times that the school buses stop though the day during the rush hours. 12. Our Community's Master Plan has outlined our priorities are to keep our neighborhood Quiet, Natural, and Rural. 13. The County Currently Allows Permitted Uses that Benefit the Community such as Churches, Daycare Facilities, Essential Services. These current uses should be explored. 14. Storage Facilities are not Desirable to the Community. Lee County is considering a Moratorium on all new Storage Facility Construction. 15. Allowing Developers to Change Zoning Now opens the FLOOD GATES to properties ALL throughout Golden Gate Estates. 16. Rules require the Developer to demonstrate a benefit to the community before approval. A storage Facility does not serve the community. Golden Gate Estates has plenty of room to store items, we are allowed barns, sheds, and guest houses. 17. Self storage unit are lately a place to storage dismembered bodies (I watched on the news no long ago) For all the reasons listed above a many more our community is 100% disagree with the construction of a self storage building My name is Maria C Hernandez -Watts and we are resident/owner of a house on 13th ave sw. From: YoungbloodAndrew Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2023 4:29 PM To: HansenRachel Cc: OrtmanEric Subject: FW: construction on 5th ave sw and 13th ave sw From: Charlotte Chase <itsmecac6@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2023 12:52 PM To: YoungbloodAndrew <Andrew.Youngblood@ col liercountvfl.gov> Subject: construction on 5th ave sw and 13th ave sw EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. I just got home from vacation and got the two letters regarding building on 5th Ave Sw and 13th Ave Sw I see you have to attend the meeting or sign -in online. Is there any way that I can VOTE NO on both without being there? I volunteer at the food pantry and won't be able to attend in person or online. I hope enough people vote no. We don't want large construction on our street. It is hard enough to get out of the street as it is, especially during the season. Please let me know as other people I talked to work and can't make the meeting. Thank you Charlotte Chase 4230 5th Ave. SW size=2 width="100%" align=center> Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: Dustin Espinosa <dustin.espinosa@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2023 4:47 PM To: HansenRachel Subject: Opposing rezone EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Hi Rachel, My name is Dustin Espinosa and I'm from 4319 13th Ave SW. I'm not sure I can make it to the 5/18 warehouse meeting but wanted to get in writing that I'm opposed to the rezoning. Best wishes, Dustin From: Costy Watts <wattscosty@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2023 5:33 PM To: HansenRachel Subject: NOT rezone on 13th ave sw Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Rachel.Hansen@CollierCountyFL.gov RE: SHAMROCK SELF STORAGE (PL20220000289 & PL20210003321) These are the reasons that as a resident and owner of 13th ave sw , me and the rest of the neighbors are opposing the construction of the self storage in our street. Below is the list of POINTS ON WHY OPPOSE 1. COMMERCIAL is not currently allowed- This is Zoned Estates Single Family with Permitted Uses, when we bought our property it was Residential, we been here for 8+ years and we love our family oriented neighborhood 2. 174,000 Sq. Ft of Building space requested is the Same Size as a TARGET! May be as high as 3 stories tall , that will be a huge impact for the vegetation and the environment with all the deforestation along with the construction 3. COMMERCIAL IS allowed in scattered designated "Neighborhood Centers" elsewhere but not on 13th ave sw. 4. Very few Jobs created by Storage Units since they are self service, NO security guards or patrolling 5. Only 6% Native vegetation preserved And Listed Species are Present Onsite (State Protected Gopher Tortoise) and could otherwise be avoided with current zoning use (house, church, etc.) 7. Neighboring properties to the north are Residential NOt commercial 8. FPL Essential Service is on West and South Side and is Preferred USE over Commercial/Industrial 9. Storage Facilities are Industrial Zoning and Bring Property Values Down and can lead to crime, we are very close to 175 which is an easy target for bad people coming and going to Miami 10. And increase in Noise, Light, Traffic 11. Children's Bus Stop is located at the Corner and is Unsafe for the kids, the traffic is already bad with 8 times that the school buses stop though the day during the rush hours. 12. Our Community's Master Plan has outlined our priorities are to keep our neighborhood Quiet, Natural, and Rural. 13. The County Currently Allows Permitted Uses that Benefit the Community such as Churches, Daycare Facilities, Essential Services. These current uses should be explored. 14. Storage Facilities are not Desirable to the Community. Lee County is considering a Moratorium on all new Storage Facility Construction. 15. Allowing Developers to Change Zoning Now opens the FLOOD GATES to properties ALL throughout Golden Gate Estates. 16. Rules require the Developer to demonstrate a benefit to the community before approval. A storage Facility does not serve the community. Golden Gate Estates has plenty of room to store items, we are allowed barns, sheds, and guest houses. 17. Self storage unit are lately a place to storage dismembered bodies (I watched on the news no long ago) For all the reasons listed above a many more our community is 100% disagree with the construction of a self storage building My name is Maria C Hernandez -Watts and we are resident/owner of a house on 13th ave sw. From: YoungbloodAndrew Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2023 4:29 PM To: HansenRachel Cc: OrtmanEric Subject: FW: construction on 5th ave sw and 13th ave sw From: Charlotte Chase <itsmecac6@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2023 12:52 PM To: YoungbloodAndrew <Andrew.Youngblood@ col liercountvfl.gov> Subject: construction on 5th ave sw and 13th ave sw EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. I just got home from vacation and got the two letters regarding building on 5th Ave Sw and 13th Ave Sw I see you have to attend the meeting or sign -in online. Is there any way that I can VOTE NO on both without being there? I volunteer at the food pantry and won't be able to attend in person or online. I hope enough people vote no. We don't want large construction on our street. It is hard enough to get out of the street as it is, especially during the season. Please let me know as other people I talked to work and can't make the meeting. Thank you Charlotte Chase 4230 5th Ave. SW size=2 width="100%" align=center> Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: Ron Starr <rstarr2678@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, May 14, 2023 10:25 AM To: HansenRachel; OrtmanEric; Burt.Sanders@colliercountyfl.gov; LoCastroRick; KowalDan; McDaniel Bill; HallChris Subject: Cubesmart Concerns Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. I write this letter today as a Concerned single father of 4, Longtime 15t" Ave SW resident, and Concerned Citizen. These are my reasons for my opposition of the Proposed Cubesmart at Collier Blvd & 131" Ave SW. 1. For the past 13 years and for many years to come, I have had and will have anywhere from 1-4 children riding Collier County Public School Buses to and from school. Just in the last 3 years, between the 11t" Ave SW and 15t" Ave SW stops we have had 8 accidents and 3 of those resulted in serious injuries. Most of the accidents happened right next to or just behind the bus and could have caused serious injuries to children. This was caused by people trying to beat the bus in between stops during normal traffic. If Cubesmart is permitted to build in this residential area, it will cause this number of accidents to increase and will most likely result in a child being seriously injured or killed. This will be due to traffic trying to avoid the semi's and moving trucks and also because the bus stop at 13th Ave SW will be in the direct path of the U-turning semi's. 2. In Collier County we already have at least 7 Cubesmart facilities. So, there is no reason to build another one in a residential neighborhood. There are plenty of properties that are not in a residential neighborhood that would be more appropriate. 3. Building this type of facility so close to a residential neighborhood will have many other negative effects than most even realize. Facilities like this can attract the criminal element and people often store illegal or harmful materials that could be combustible. This would be detrimental if combustible material went off so close to a power station. According to the Department of Homeland Security Power Stations are considered Key Infrastructure. To allow a facility that could potentially have harmful chemicals, or any combustible materials stored in it, to be built directly next to a power plant would be a direct violation of DHS Guidelines. 4. Due to the reasons already listed, and the fact that this facility will be a gigantic eyesore, property values in the surrounding neighborhood will drop drastically. This could cause unnecessary litigation against Collier County and would most certainly affect Property Taxes. Neither of which benefits Collier County. My biggest concern is the children. Our children are our future leaders of our community and country. To risk their safety and lives for a storage facility that has no tangible value to Collier County, or the surrounding neighborhoods just seems wrong and downright criminal. Please do the right thing and do not allow this catastrophe to take place. Thank you. From: YoungbloodAndrew Sent: Monday, May 15, 2023 8:34 AM To: Hansen Rachel; OrtmanEric Cc: PadronAilyn Subject: FW: Virtual Vote on Petitions for 5th Ave SW and 13th Ave SW Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Rachel & Eric, Please see below regarding Shamrock Self Storage and Collier Blvd church... Andrew Youngblood, MBA Management Analyst II o -ter OWIty Public Utilities Department Deliver best value, high qualify and sustainable services that meet our customers' expectations! 3339 Tamiami Trail E, Suite 301 Naples, FL 34112 Direct Line - 239.252.2624 and rew.Youngblood 6a�colIiercountyfl.gov From: Jonathan and Amanda Duncan <amandacduncan@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, May 15, 2023 8:02 AM To: YoungbloodAndrew <Andrew.Youngblood@ col liercountyfl.gov> Subject: Virtual Vote on Petitions for 5th Ave SW and 13th Ave SW EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Good morning Mr. Youngblood, I am unable to attend the in person meeting being held on 5/18/23 for the rezoning changes to 5th Ave SW and 13 Ave SW so I wanted to send in my vote via email: 5th Ave SW petition number - PL20220003327 - NO 13th Ave SW petition number - PL20220000289 - NO 13th Ave SW petition number - PL20210003321 - NO My name is Amanda Duncan and I live at 4250 5th Ave SW, Naples FL 34119. Thank you for hearing from the concerned citizens and residents of these areas. We do not want to our area rezoned and certainly don't want commercial buildings to be erected right in front of our homes. Thank you, Amanda Duncan 239-595-3963 size=2 width="100%" align=center> Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: Mary Tatigian <mtatigian@hotmail.com> Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2023 7:40 AM To: HansenRachel Subject: storage unit Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Rachel, I object to the rezoning of land the county and builders are attempting to do in Collier County. We do not need a huge storage unit on 13th Ave and Cty Rd 951, we will never use it. It will bring in other people who do not live here to use and more traffic for us, more noise and most of all the REZONING which is not in the GG Master Plan. At some point we need to take a step back and consider the citizens of Naples and not the builders. We pay taxes and should be afforded some protection from this uncontrolled growth. I VOTE NO ON THE STORAGE UNIT on 13th Ave and County Rd 951. Thank you, Mary Tatigian RN, BC President QuietFlorida.Org STOP NOISE POLLUTION info@quietflorida.org Florida Affiliate of: Noise Free America.Org Quiet Communities.Org Quiet Florida STOP THE NOISE There is no PEACE without QUIET From: YoungbloodAndrew Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2023 8:30 AM To: Hansen Rachel; OrtmanEric Cc: PadronAilyn Subject: FW: Rezoing Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged See below for Items 1 & 2 today. Andrew Youngblood, MBA Management Analyst II Public Utilities Department Deliver best value, high quality and sustainable services that meet our customers' expectations! 3339 Tamiami Trail E, Suite 301 Naples, FL 34112 Direct Line - 239.252.2624 andrew.youngblood@colliercountyfl.gov -----Original Message ----- From: Terie Hanson <newportteach@hotmail.com> Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2023 6:41 AM To: YoungbloodAndrew <Andrew.Youngblood@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Rezoing EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. This pertains to the meeting that is being held Thursday May19 at 9:00 in the morning.. I am voting NO on the rezoning! When we bought our house 12 years ago we were told it would not be rezoned .. there are hundreds of animal species in this area plus the added noise! We already have more noise than we bargained for on Collier Blvd! I am a teacher and can not be at the meeting my name is Terie Hanson 13985 Collier Blvd 34119 Thankyou Sent from my iPhone Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: YoungbloodAndrew Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2023 9:26 AM To: Hansen Rachel; OrtmanEric Cc: PadronAilyn Subject: FW: PL20220000289, PL202100003321 Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged See below for feedback on Shamrock... Andrew Youngblood, MBA Management Analyst II C;Ofl;-r C07414ty Public Utilities Department Deliver best value, high quality and sustainable services that meet our customers' expectations! 3339 Tamiami Trail E, Suite 301 Naples, FL 34112 Direct Line - 239.252.2624 and rew.Youngblood (a�colIiercountyfl.gov From: Kaytie Brauning <kbrauning@tricam.com> Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2023 9:22 AM To: YoungbloodAndrew <Andrew.Youngblood@col liercountyfl.gov> Subject: PL20220000289, PL202100003321 EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Andrew, I am voting NO on the rezoning of 4050 13t" Ave SW so a storage facility can be built in residential GG Estates. Sincerely, Kathryn Brauning 4611 15t" Ave SW Naples, FL 34116 From: Steve Adams <SAdams@lightingfirst.us> Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2023 4:08 PM To: Hansen Rachel; OrtmanEric Subject: 'No' to Self Storage at Collier Blvd and 13th Ave SW Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Good Afternoon Rachel and Eric, I was unable to attend the public meeting today but I wanted to express my strong opposition to the proposal to rezone the land at 4050 13t" Ave SW and 4050 13t" Ave to allow for the Shamrock Self Storage. As a homeowner right on Collier Blvd I can express that the additional traffic it will create would be very burdensome, it would create a large eyesore in our rural area and there are plenty of storage options already in close proximity. I urge you to please not allow for the rezoning in my neighborhood for this use. Thank you for your consideration and for all you do keeping Southwest Florida the best place to live! Best, Steve Adams 12885 Collier Blvd. Naples, FL 34116 From: Jennifer C. Adriaanse <jenadriaanse@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, May 19, 2023 4:17 PM To: Hansen Rachel; LoCastroRick; HallChris; KowalDan; SaundersBurt; McDanielBill; HansenRachel Subject: Proposed storage unit - 13th Ave Sw and collier Blvd- district 3 Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Collier County Commissioners, How can you vote on something without first seeing what you are voting for. I am writing regarding the storage unit proposal in district 3. Please don't respond saying that this isn't your district because ultimately you are still voting for it. Please don't send back a generic response that is sent to everyone. I can ask my neighbor for that. When you are working for the people I believe you should spend time to personally acknowledge each individuals input and respond. I understand that would be a lot of responses and time, but I guarantee being on a more intimate level with responses will truly show you care about the citizens and their concerns. I would like to ask each of you to visit the site of the proposed 174,000 sq ft, "cube smart" storage unit located at the corner of 13th Ave Sw and Collier Blvd before it is discussed on the agenda and voted on. The site is only 5.5 acres. Hopefully you will vote against this project that will break the intention of the "Golden Gate Estates Master Plan" after you hear from the passionate citizens who live in the rural area because of the surrounding beauty and nature. In no way will a storage facility help the current residential area as we have acreage to store our items. A storage unit is for industrial parks. This is not an industrial area. Please go to the site and take a look at the well kept, well maintained empty model home that currently sits on the residential land. You will notice that because of the wooded buffers and natural habitat, the FLP station is well hidden. As you stand and look at the site, please imagine that area with no trees and instead, the view of a large commercial building only 150 feet away from a residential home. Imagine living in that home and your view now and if this proposal is approved. With the booming housing market I believe the lot should remain residential and will sell if marketed as such. "Storage unit" is mentioned zero times in the area master plan. Thanks Jen Adriaanse