Loading...
CCPC Agenda 12/07/2023 3 pmCollier County Planning Commission Page 1 Printed 11/30/2023 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Planning Commission AGENDA Board of County Commission Chambers Collier County Government Center 3299 Tamiami Trail East, 3rd Floor Naples, FL 34112 December 7, 2023 3: 00 PM Edwin Fryer- Chairman Joseph Schmitt, Environmental - Vice-Chair Paul Shea, Environmental - Secretary Christopher Vernon Robert Klucik, Jr. Randy Sparrazza Chuck Schumacher Amy Lockhart, Collier County School Board Note: Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes on any item. Individuals selected to speak on behalf of an organization or group are encouraged and may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item if so recognized by the chairman. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the CCPC agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 10 days prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the CCPC shall be submitted to the appropriate county staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All material used in presentations before the CCPC will become a permanent part of the record and will be available for presentation to the Board of County Commissioners if applicable. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the CCPC will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto, and therefore may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. December 2023 Collier County Planning Commission Page 2 Printed 11/30/2023 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call by Secretary 3. Addenda to the Agenda 4. Planning Commission Absences 5. Approval of Minutes A. November 2, 2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes B. November 16, 2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes 6. BCC Report - Recaps 7. Chairman's Report 8. Consent Agenda 9. Public Hearings A. Advertised 1. PL20220001010 - GMPA - Mattson at Vanderbilt - An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners amending Ordinance 89-05, as amended, the Collier County Growth Management Plan, specifically amending the Future Land Use Element and Map Series by changing the land use designation of property from Urban, Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict to Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict, to allow a maximum density of 150 multifamily rental units with affordable housing, and furthermore directing transmittal of the adopted amendment to the Florida Department of Commerce. The subject property is located on the north side of Vanderbilt Beach Road, approximately 828 feet from the intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Livingston Road, in Section 31, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 5.88± acres. [Coordinator: Kathy Eastley, AICP, Planner III] (Companion Item PUDZ PL20220001011) Page 1 of 2 AGENDA COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION WILL MEET AT 3:00 P.M. DECEMBER 7, 2023, IN THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING ROOM, ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER, THIRD FLOOR, 3299 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST, NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112. INDIVIDUALS WHO WOULD LIKE TO PARTICIPATE REMOTELY SHOULD REGISTER AT https://bit.ly/12723CCPC ANY TIME AFTER THE AGENDA IS POSTED ON THE COUNTY WEBSITE, WHICH IS 6 DAYS BEFORE THE MEETING OR THROUGH THE LINK PROVIDED ON THE FRONT PAGE OF THE COUNTY WEBSITE AT http://colliercountyfl.iqm2.com/Citizens/default.aspx INDIVIDUALS WHO REGISTER WILL RECEIVE AN EMAIL IN ADVANCE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING DETAILING HOW THEY CAN PARTICIPATE REMOTELY IN THIS MEETING. FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE MEETING, PLEASE EMAIL TO AILYN PADRON AT: Alyn.Padron@CollierCountyFL.gov . NOTE: INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO 5 MINUTES ON ANY ITEM. INDIVIDUALS SELECTED TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZATION OR GROUP ARE ENCOURAGED AND MAY BE ALLOTTED 10 MINUTES TO SPEAK ON AN ITEM IF SO, RECOGNIZED BY THE CHAIRMAN. PERSONS WISHING TO HAVE WRITTEN OR GRAPHIC MATERIALS INCLUDED IN THE CCPC AGENDA PACKETS MUST SUBMIT SAID MATERIAL A MINIMUM OF 10 DAYS PRIOR TO THE RESPECTIVE PUBLIC HEARING. IN ANY CASE, WRITTEN MATERIALS INTENDED TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE CCPC SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE APPROPRIATE COUNTY STAFF A MINIMUM OF SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING. ALL MATERIAL USED IN PRESENTATIONS BEFORE THE CCPC WILL BECOME A PERMANENT PART OF THE RECORD AND WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS IF APPLICABLE. ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THE CCPC WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO AND, THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. 1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. ROLL CALL BY SECRETARY 3. ADDENDA TO THE AGENDA 4. PLANNING COMMISSION ABSENCES 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. November 02, 2023, CCPC Meeting Minutes B. November 16, 2023, CCPC Meeting Minutes 6. BCC REPORT- RECAPS 7. CHAIRMAN’S REPORT 8. CONSENT AGENDA Page 2 of 2 9. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. ADVERTISED: PL20220001010 - GMPA – Mattson at Vanderbilt - An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners amending Ordinance 89-05, as amended, the Collier County Growth Management Plan, specifically amending the Future Land Use Element and Map Series by changing the land use designation of property from Urban, Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict to Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict, to allow a maximum density of 150 multifamily rental units with affordable housing, and furthermore directing transmittal of the adopted amendment to the Florida Department of Commerce. The subject property is located on the north side of Vanderbilt Beach Road, approximately 828 feet from the intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Livingston Road, in Section 31, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 5.88± acres. [Coordinator: Kathy Eastley, AICP, Planner III] (Companion Item PUDZ PL20220001011) PL20220001011 – (PUDZ) Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD - An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, amending Ordinance number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from a Rural Agricultural (A) Zoning District to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) Zoning District for the project to be known as Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD, to allow construction of up to 150 multi- family rental units with affordable housing on property located on the north side of Vanderbilt Beach Road, approximately 828 feet from the intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Livingston Road, in Section 31, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, consisting of 5.88± acres; and by providing an effective date. [Coordinator: Timothy Finn, AICP, Planner III] (Companion item PL20220001010) 10. OLD BUSINESS 11. NEW BUSINESS 12. PUBLIC COMMENT 13. ADJOURN December 2023 Collier County Planning Commission Page 3 Printed 11/30/2023 2. PL20220001011 – (PUDZ) Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD - An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, amending Ordinance number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from a Rural Agricultural (A) Zoning District to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) Zoning District for the project to be known as Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD, to allow construction of up to 150 multi-family rental units with affordable housing on property located on the north side of Vanderbilt Beach Road, approximately 828 feet from the intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Livingston Road, in Section 31, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, consisting of 5.88± acres; and by providing an effective date. [Coordinator: Timothy Finn, AICP, Planner III] (Companion item PL20220001010) B. Noticed 10. Old Business 11. New Business 12. Public Comment 13. Adjourn 12/07/2023 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Planning Commission Item Number: 5.A Doc ID: 27279 Item Summary: November 2, 2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes Meeting Date: 12/07/2023 Prepared by: Title: Operations Analyst – Planning Commission Name: Diane Lynch 11/15/2023 1:29 PM Submitted by: Title: Zoning Director – Zoning Name: Mike Bosi 11/15/2023 1:29 PM Approved By: Review: Growth Management Community Development Department Diane Lynch Department review Completed 11/15/2023 1:29 PM Operations & Regulatory Management Donna Guitard Review Item Completed 11/15/2023 2:27 PM Zoning Mike Bosi Division Director Completed 11/15/2023 4:32 PM Zoning Ray Bellows Review Item Completed 11/15/2023 4:51 PM Growth Management Community Development Department James C French GMD Deputy Dept Head Completed 11/16/2023 3:26 PM Planning Commission Ray Bellows Meeting Pending 12/07/2023 3:00 PM 5.A Packet Pg. 4 November 2, 2023 Page 1 of 48 TRANSCRIPT OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Naples, Florida November 2, 2023 LET IT BE REMEMBERED that the Collier County Planning Commission, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 9:00 a.m., in REGULAR SESSION in Building "F" of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the following members present: Edwin Fryer, Chairman Joe Schmitt, Vice Chair Robert L. Klucik, Jr. (attending remotely) Paul Shea Randy Sparrazza Chuck Schumacher Amy Lockhart, Collier County School Board Representative ABSENT: Christopher T. Vernon ALSO PRESENT: Mike Bosi, Planning and Zoning Director Kathleen Eastley, Planner III Heidi Ashton-Cicko, Managing Assistant County Attorney 5.A.a Packet Pg. 5 Attachment: 11-02-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27279 : November 2, 2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes) November 2, 2023 Page 2 of 48 P R O C E E D I N G S MR. BOSI: Chair, you have a live mic. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you, Mr. Bosi. Good morning, everyone. I'm glad to see that we managed to squeeze in everyone who wanted to be in attendance at this meeting, and I love all your red shirts, too. Thanks for being here. Everyone please rise for the Pledge of Allegiance. (The Pledge of Allegiance was recited in unison.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: I forgot one little technicality, and that was I hereby call to order this meeting of November 2, 2023, of the Collier County Planning Commission. Before we call on the secretary to call the roll, I'm informed that we have a commissioner who would like to ask that he be permitted to participate electronically. Commissioner Klucik, are you there, sir? COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Yes, thank you, Mr. Chairman. I would. Unfortunately, I had some -- once again, had some things come up that just can't be delayed for a client. So I apologize. I can be here remotely, though. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Thank you very much. Understood. And I'll entertain a motion to permit his participation. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Make a motion to allow for his participation. I can't even talk this morning. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Is there a second? COMMISSIONER SPARRAZZA: Second. CHAIRMAN FRYER: All in favor, please say aye. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Aye. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Aye. COMMISSIONER SPARRAZZA: Aye. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: Aye. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: (No verbal response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Welcome to your participation, Commissioner Klucik. And with that, I'll ask the secretary to please call the roll. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Chairman Fryer? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Here. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Vice Chair Schmitt? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Here. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Secretary Shea is here. Christopher Vernon? (No response.) COMMISSIONER SHEA: Commissioner Vernon is not coming. Commissioner Klucik is on Zoom. Commissioner Sparrazza? COMMISSIONER SPARRAZZA: Here. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Commissioner Schumacher? COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: Here. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Ms. Lockhart? MS. LOCKHART: Here. COMMISSIONER SHEA: We have a quorum, sir. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you very much. 5.A.a Packet Pg. 6 Attachment: 11-02-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27279 : November 2, 2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes) November 2, 2023 Page 3 of 48 And just to complete the record, Commissioner Vernon's absence is excused. We are very liberal with that policy anyway, but especially so for individual commissioners who work in the working world. And we think it's good diversity, if you will, to have representatives who are still employed professionally engaged in the community along with the rest of us, like myself, who is retired, though it doesn't feel that way. So we're glad that we have working folks up here, and we're always very liberal in handling those excused absences or the participation by phone when necessary to accommodate their day job -- their other job. So thank you. Addenda to the agenda, Mr. Bellow. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: He's not here. MR. BOSI: Mike Bosi, Planning and Zoning director. Mr. Bellows has the day off. He -- as the zoning manager, he -- his world really doesn't touch the AUIR/CIE. So we have Kathy Eastley, the primary principal project manager for the AUIR. She did a great job. This is her first year involved in it, and she's taken Ray's place, so to speak. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Today, yeah. Well, that's great. And, Ms. Eastley, certainly, I would never compare you in looks to Ray Bellows. I just hadn't looked over there. So my earnest apologies, and warm welcome. MS. EASTLEY: Thank you. CHAIRMAN FRYER: All right. Let's see. Planning Commission absences. Our next meeting is on November 16, 2023. Does anyone know if he or she will not be available? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: It looks like I will not be available for that meeting. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Thank you. So then -- anybody else? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: All right, good. So then our meeting after that is actually two sessions, and it's going to be December 7, Pearl Harbor Day, if you will, and this meeting will start at 3 p.m. for the daytime agenda item or items, and then we'll reconvene at 5:05 p.m. for the items that have to be heard in the evening. Does anyone know whether he or she is unable to attend those meetings? COMMISSIONER SHEA: I will be unable to attend those meetings. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Thank you. It looks like we'll have a quorum in both cases, nonetheless, so that is a good thing. Thank you. And just a reminder that there will be no second December meeting. The December 21 meeting has been canceled due to the holidays. Approval of the minutes: We have none in front of us today for action. BCC report/recaps, Mr. Bosi. MR. BOSI: On the October 26th BCC meeting, the Board of County Commissioners did approve the Ascend project, the GMP amendment as well as the PUD, for the affordable housing across from Island Walk, as well as, on the summary agenda, the GMP and PUD for the Lutgert storage facility near The Haven. That was also approved on summary agenda. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Mike, a question on the -- on the airport authority. Did they continue to oppose that proposal, do you recall? On the Board, it was a 4-1 vote, as I recall. But was -- did the matters that we worked out here carry over, or was there still continued opposition? MR. BOSI: The applicant and airport authority came to a mutual agreement upon the language within the aviation [sic] easement. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yeah. MR. BOSI: But they did request that it be placed on the regular agenda for the Board's -- for the upcoming, the 12 -- or the 11/14 BCC hearing. CHAIRMAN FRYER: I'm just not real comfortable with that because of the fact that we spent a lot of time working with them to come to a consensus on what was represented to us, I believe, as being 5.A.a Packet Pg. 7 Attachment: 11-02-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27279 : November 2, 2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes) November 2, 2023 Page 4 of 48 the only contested issue, and then to have the airport authority say, well, we want to keep the thing open as if -- as if there were others that weren't put forth to us, which appears to be the case, I think is not entirely cricket from one government agency to another, and I don't -- I take somewhat umbrage of that. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I also understand -- and, again, it was reading articles -- that the airport authority, though, of course, it's not our involvement, because it's the City of Naples, but they're looking at a study to relocate the airport. I mean, is there any realm of possibility, feasibility that there is even a location, unless we go all the way to the Dade County/Collier County line, of any location for an airport, other than we have three other airports in this county, Immokalee, Marco Island, and what's the one -- MR. BOSI: Everglades? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: City -- down off 41? MR. BOSI: Everglades? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Everglades City, thank you. MR. BOSI: And I haven't spoken with Transportation staff, which the airports are underneath. I don't believe that they have any -- spent any time contemplating that relocation. I'm sure they will be involved with some of the -- some of the consultant work that's -- and research that's going to be associated with this study. But, you know, I think anything's possible, but I would -- just my own -- my own assessment, it would be extremely hard to relocate the airport in terms of another location just because of the sensitivity that airports bring in relationship to a land use. I think airports -- airports and landfills are two of the hardest things to sit in terms of a land-use arrangement. So I'm not sure all of the political issues that rose to arrive upon the City of Naples commissioning the study, but we will participate in any way that they ask us to participate. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Well, when you look at the Rural Land Stewardship and you look at the Future Land Use Map, it's pretty clear. I think we can probably advise, for free, rather than them spending $5 million, and I can do the study in about three and a half minutes. No, there's no place feasible. Thank you. Send me the check. MR. BOSI: And we agree. It's most certainly going to be -- it's an uphill -- it's an uphill climb. CHAIRMAN FRYER: You're absolutely right, of course, and there's a lot more background that I won't -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I'm sure the city is -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: But it's purely political, and it has to do with one of the HOAs, just one of the HOAs making the loudest noise. That's all I'll say. Okay. Let's see. We don't have anything else on the BCC report, or do we? MR. BOSI: No, that's it for the BCC report. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: Chair, if I may, just a question. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yes, please go ahead. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: During the County Commissioners meeting, there was discussion for -- is that Lakewood? Or down off of 41 and towards -- MR. BOSI: I think -- the Riviera Golf? COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: Where they're talking about that was going to go to a HEX, and the commissioners were talking about sending that either back to here, or is it going to them only? MR. BOSI: No. That related to a future conditional use that will be before the Planning Commission and then ultimately the Board of County Commissioners. It's called STARability, related to a conditional use within the Lakewood golf course. That petition is still in the staff review, and the applicant has indicated that they are making some significant revisions to the application. It's going to have to have another neighborhood information meeting, so you're at least six months away from that coming to you. That was requested by Commissioner Kowal to not go the single route to the HEX. Because of the heightened public interest, that was directed to go to the Planning Commission and to the Board of 5.A.a Packet Pg. 8 Attachment: 11-02-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27279 : November 2, 2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes) November 2, 2023 Page 5 of 48 County Commissioners. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: Okay. MR. BOSI: What they decided upon was -- the representative of the Lakewood community, Mr. Tony Pires, had submitted an official interpretation asking me what constitutes a neighborhood fitness community center, and within that submittal, he had indicated that it was a very narrow focus in terms of reach that that neighborhood fitness community center could have. My interpretation was a little more broadly in terms of the reach -- the market area that could be served by a community center. He has -- he has appealed that. So instead of taking that to the HEX, the Board of County Commissioners said, take that directly to the Board of County Commissioners to hear the arguments. Tony's perspective is he wants to -- he wants to challenge the STARability project, that it doesn't fit the criteria of a neighborhood fitness community center. Staff's interpretation, like I said, is a little bit more broad. We feel that the conditional-use process will evaluate the compatibility and the appropriateness of that facility in relationship to where it's being proposed. So the Board will provide an ultimate decision on that appeal of the OI. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: Thank you. CHAIRMAN FRYER: And it will pause along the way to be heard by the Planning Commission as well? MR. BOSI: Well, that -- the OI doesn't -- the OI and the appeal of the OI will have no -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: Oh, the official interpretation -- MR. BOSI: It won't come to the Planning Commission, but after -- once the STARability project has its second neighborhood information meeting, you know, has satisfied staff review, the next stop from that will be the Planning Commission, you'll make a recommendation, and then the Board of County Commissioners will ultimately make that decision upon that. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Okay. Chairman's report: None today. Consent agenda: None today. ***That takes us to our first and only public hearing, advertised. It is PL20230013268, the AUIR and CIE for 2023. Mr. Bosi. MR. BOSI: Thank you. Chair, Planning Commission, like I said, we have a presentation. I'm going to give an overview of just the overall AUIR/CIE and its purpose. As you can see by the seats, the general public for -- you know, does not have a strong interest/role within this, but I think the general public does appreciate what the AUIR and CIE represents. It represents maintaining of the levels of service that we've identified for infrastructure and service providers through the general purpose county government. But I'll get to my PowerPoint presentation, and we'll go over that. Again, Mike Bosi, Zoning and Planning director. AUIR/CIE. In the planning world, we are famous for our acronyms, and this is another one of those acronyms. AUIR is the Annual Update and Inventory Report. It's a one-year snapshot in time of the projected needs and the required capital improvements for the next five years based upon our projected population increases against the BCC adopted levels of service. It should be noted that this snapshot changes as the demand equation changes and evolves. One of the things about the AUIR/CIE, it's an annual process. There are no real surprises when we come to you every year. It's a continuation of the program that we had put forward in the prior year, which builds upon the other prior year. The long and short of the AUIR is how much expected population do we -- do we expect over the next five years, and what are the necessary infrastructure expansions to be able to handle the additional demands that that population will put upon our infrastructure and also our individual service providers. And the thought behind this and why we perform this -- and as a sidenote, Collier County is the only county -- and it has been for 15 years that I've been involved in the AUIR. We're the only one who really gets to this type of level of specificity. We're the only one who performs the Annual Update and 5.A.a Packet Pg. 9 Attachment: 11-02-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27279 : November 2, 2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes) November 2, 2023 Page 6 of 48 Inventory Report. Most other jurisdictions, cities or counties, they'll perform updates to the CIE, but not -- and the CIE really covers your concurrency management infrastructure providers. The AUIR also covers a category, Category B, which is law enforcement, which is jails, which is government space, which is EMS, libraries, portions that really don't get addressed within your Capital Improvement Element, but we maintain -- we include them in the AUIR to make sure that we are maintaining the adopted levels of service that we have. And also, we have a Category C, which is coastal management. So we have a unique process that we've developed, and we utilize it, like we said, to continue to make sure that we can administer our Concurrency Management System but make sure we also maintain the expectations of our community in terms of how they experience our infrastructure and our facilities. There's three categories. A, which is the concurrency facilities: Road, drainage, potable water, wastewater, solid waste, parks and recreation, and schools; and they're all tied to the Capital Improvement Element. The only components that are required by statute currently would be potable water, wastewater, solid waste, and drainage. Those -- the other, roads, parks and recreation, and schools, those are -- the county has chosen to maintain those as part of the Concurrency Management System by individual board decision to maintain those within the Category A. Our Category B are jails, law enforcement, libraries, EMS, and government buildings, as I noted, and the Category C has your beach and inlets. So concurrency. What is concurrency? I kind of hit upon this. It's facilities and services necessary to maintain the adopted levels-of-service standards that are available when the impacts of development occur, which are contained within the CIE policies in the Land Development Code. So when a land-use petition comes before you and they're proposing 400 units within a segment on Airport Road, our chairman goes back, looks at the prior AUIR, looks at the road segments, looks at the volume capacity that's associated with them, and oftentimes you'll ask questions in terms of roadway capacity. Is there enough to satisfy the additional demands that that project's going to be providing for? So it plays a critical role within the approval process that the Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners are asked to do related to land-use petitions to ensure that there's adequate projects in the pipeline or there's adequate capacity within the system to be able to handle those additional demands that are associated with that individual request. The CIE, it's driven by population, as I've said. Our year-round population, it's provided by the University of Florida Bureau of Economic and Business Research -- another acronym, it's BEBR -- and we utilize the medium-range projections. But we also know January, February, and March we've got a seasonal population, and that seasonal population places additional demands upon that infrastructure, and we have to have the capacity to be able to handle that additional demand. Our seasonal population is a 20 percent increase over our permanent population. That's based upon traffic counts, that's based upon wastewater and potable water usage, solid waste disposal rates. So there's science that we've utilized to confirm that that is the appropriate number that we have to utilize from a seasonal point of view. And then the question is, how much do you build? And I always use libraries as the example, because they are -- it's pretty straightforward. It's new population times your level-of-service standard, and that equals your Capital Improvement program. So for this next five years, we expect 28,338 people. We have an adopted level-of-service standard. It's .33 square feet per person. So the math is simple. You take your 28,388, and you multiple it by .33, and to maintain the system -- the concurrency -- or the system for libraries and the adopted level of service, we'd need to build 9,352 square feet additionally to be able to handle the new demands that are coming in. COMMISSIONER SHEA: What if you have existing capacity? Why are you just doing the addition if you don't have -- you could have enough capacity? MR. BOSI: Well, that's just the first part of your question. That's how much you need. So then you would -- and each one of your -- each one of your summary pages will say, what's the required 5.A.a Packet Pg. 10 Attachment: 11-02-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27279 : November 2, 2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes) November 2, 2023 Page 7 of 48 capacity and what's the existing capacity? If you've got existing capacity that exceeds your required capacity, no projects are needed to satisfy a deficiency, because you've got a surplus. And it's funny you pointed that out. We built the south library sometime around 2005/2006. We've had capacity since we've constructed that library. It put us way over our required capacity, so we haven't proposed a new library in over a decade and a half because of that additional capacity. But that's simply to show how -- the trigger of how much you need to be able to satisfy, and then that's compared against what is our existing square footage or our existing quantity of that infrastructure provided. And, please, feel free to ask questions at any time. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. I'm going to say this, though. Certainly the Planning Commission can ask questions whenever they feel the need or desire to, but I think we might be more efficient if we go section by section. For instance, the subject of the libraries is something that I expect Commissioner Shea has more to say about, and I have some things to say about it. I'm sorry that Commissioner Vernon isn't here, because he also had expressed concerns. But I'm going to save those specific comments until we get to the section on libraries. Having said that, Planning Commissioners, I mean, you can ask whenever. COMMISSIONER SPARRAZZA: Thank you. Mr. Bosi, I looked through the report. I admit I may have missed it. But can you give me a little bit of background on BEBR and how accurate they have been in the past? We use them, it seems -- and, Board, please assist me. We use them for basically everything that this program's discussing. And I kind of looked back. I only saw information on the 2010 census and the 2020 census, but that's a 10-year gap. Have -- has their rate of accuracy been within a tolerable range? MR. BOSI: And that is the demographic population projection source that the state identifies for each county and jurisdiction. COMMISSIONER SPARRAZZA: Correct. MR. BOSI: And here's how it traditionally works. The further you get out from the census year, the more degrees of deviation that you're going to have within the estimations and the population. They do a really good job: Building permits issued, electrical hookup. They really get into some real quantifiable means to be able to project moving into the future, but as we know, it's a regression analysis that you try to project moving forward. So there's a lot of other variables that have to be brought into it. The decennial census provides a kind of checkup and just a reset, and the further you get from the 2010, the 2020 census, the more deviation you're probably going to get in terms of their projections. But we find when we're in these first three or four years in proximity to the census, we find that the population projections normally will provide a degree of accuracy that we are confident in. COMMISSIONER SPARRAZZA: That you're comfortable with, okay. MR. BOSI: Yes. COMMISSIONER SPARRAZZA: And, for example, in a simple term, if we looked at 2012 -- if in 2012 we looked back at what 2010's actual numbers were, were they close to what BEBR predicted? MR. BOSI: And I'll give you -- I'll raise you a decade. We'll go to 2022. In 2022, we looked back when the census numbers really -- because it was about a year and a half, two years before the -- when the census is provided and published towards when it really becomes true to -- there's a trueing up of the numbers. We found that we were a bit ahead of ourselves -- BEBR was a bit ahead of themselves as to what they were expecting our population to be. It was about a 10,000-person difference between what we expected -- what we said was here in 2020, and then 2022 looked back and said, no, it was -- we're going to take about 10,000 persons away because we were -- we overestimated what that population would be. COMMISSIONER SPARRAZZA: So the final answer, I believe, it sounds like the county is very comfortable continuing to use BEBR plus or minus X percent. It's not like, oh, my gosh, they've 5.A.a Packet Pg. 11 Attachment: 11-02-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27279 : November 2, 2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes) November 2, 2023 Page 8 of 48 been 50 percent off for these last X years; we should find a different way. MR. BOSI: No, and there was a time when I first started this in 2006/2007. We didn't utilize the BEBR medium population. We used the BEBR high population. We were a much -- we were a more rapidly growing community than what we currently are as we start to mature. COMMISSIONER SPARRAZZA: Yeah. MR. BOSI: And as you see -- COMMISSIONER SPARRAZZA: It does steady out. MR. BOSI: You look at the urban area. The urban area, there's no 150, 250 green space, non-environmentally sensitive parcels of land just sitting out there. So the growth that we are projecting are going to be associated with the towns and villages of the RLSA. Some towns and -- or some villages associated with the Rural Fringe Mixed-Use District. And if you look at the buildout rates of those communities, they tend to be a little bit slower than what our urban community -- our urban community's buildout rates are. So I think that the switch that they did declare that we, you know, switch to the medium rate is appropriate. And here's the -- I guess the final thing I would say related to the accuracy. It's not like we do this every five years or every 10 years, and we look back and say, oh, gosh, we were so far off. We do it every year. So every year it allows kind of another opportunity to true up a little bit. So because it's an annual thing -- and like I said, there's really no surprises within the AUIR/CIE. There's -- most of the time -- and this is how our Capital Improvement programming works. Our Transportation has a 2045 Long-Range Transportation Plan. They identified all the facilities that would be needed and could be funded. We have got long-range master plans for our facilities department. We've got long-range master plan for almost every one -- all our infrastructure providers. We identify projects within our long-range plan. And then as those out-years become closer, they start -- they come into our CIE. Our CIE is made of two separate planning periods. Our 6- to 10-, those are projects that are needed, but they're not quite -- you know, they're not -- they're not ready for prime time, so to speak. They're out there in that 6- to 10-year, but we put them. And then they graduate to the first five years, and that's the next five years, the current period, the category -- or Exhibit A, we call it, within the CIE, and that's the -- that's the projects that we know we need within these next five years. And then there's -- another subset of that five-year period is in your first two years. Those are the projects that we really have to identify where the funding source is going to be, because those projects are almost -- are ready to be let, meaning that they're ready to initiate the construction phase. So it's an elongated process. So there's no real -- there's no real surprises, and there's plenty of opportunities for trueing up and making sure that the projects that are being proposed are projects that are truly needed and they're focused within the right geographic area and they're providing the necessary relief so we can move forward with the additional development requests that we are constantly asked to do. COMMISSIONER SPARRAZZA: Thank you very much. I appreciate your time on that. MR. BOSI: And it was a perfect segue. COMMISSIONER SPARRAZZA: I knew. MR. BOSI: So -- and thank you, Commissioner Sparrazza. It gives me the opportunity. So this is the last seven years of the AUIR. It started in 2017. And if you look, 2017, our annual population growth and percentage-wise it was -- you know, we're just under 2 percent, and we're hanging at that for about four years. We were between 1.97 and 1.9. And then right after the decennial census, we started to see BEBR's projections for the county to start to throttle back a bit, and we dropped from 1.9 to 1.77, and then in 2022 we dropped to 1.51, and then in 2023, we dropped to 1.42. Now, I will admit, the laws of large numbers starts to kick in when you're going -- when you're at -- when you're a 20,000-person county, like we were in the '40s, you know, adding 8,000 people is a huge percentage increase. When you're at 400,000, 405,000 permanent population, it starts to -- it starts to change with that percentage. But with all that being said, the number of persons that we're seeing compared to -- from 2017 to 2023. In 2023 we're expecting 28 -- like I said, 28,533 people. 5.A.a Packet Pg. 12 Attachment: 11-02-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27279 : November 2, 2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes) November 2, 2023 Page 9 of 48 If we would look back at the 2017 AUIR, that five-year period, it was actually a projection of about 40- to 42,000 people. So not only are -- you know, our annual percentages are declining, but the real people that are coming, the number of people, has been drawn back a bit. And I think most people in this town would probably be surprised at that statement, but that's the reality, and I think it has a lot to do with the changing nature and the placement of where that development is being focused upon, meaning the eastern portion of the county. But I also think issues of affordability and insurability are things that -- I think everyone on this commission would understand and would agree that those are great concerns to the long-term viability of what our populations and what our populations eventually will be. But it's not just population. It's a key metric in the level-of-service standards for most facilities, but there's exceptions. Roads and bridges, great example. They use traffic counts collected multiple times a year, plus a trip bank to reserve capacity. So it's not just population that dictates, but it's the Concurrency Management System in addition to the traffic that counts that influence where the proposals and where the demand is expected to be. Wastewater and water, they use historical demand usage, plus population projection, plus additional capacity for the reserves. The Board of County Commissioners, especially within the utility system, asks us to be more conservative to make sure that that facility is available when needed. If you're -- good example -- and I don't want to pick on parks, but let's use parks. You've got acreage per capita. If you go to Veterans Memorial and your kid wants to swing on the swing and he has to wait five minutes for the swing because it's occupied, you know, that's one thing, but if your kid has to go to the bathroom and that capacity is not -- not available within the system, that's another thing. So that's one of the reasons why we're a little bit more conservative when it comes to wastewater and potable water. We always want to make sure that when you open up the tap, that that water's going to be able to flow and that when you kind of hit the -- hit the other side, that it's going away as well without any issues. Because in about 2000/2001, we had -- we had some issues with wastewater capacity, and that has influenced the Board of County Commissioners in terms of being a little bit more conservative in that area. Stormwater, it's based its studies in water management -- water management master plans that set the baselines. Solid waste is landfill disposal capacity. I'll give the accolades right now, and I always do this, and you guys are probably tired of hearing this, but one of the things people always say about what does local government do for you -- and I think local government does a lot for its citizens. But Solid Waste is one of those good-news items that I like to trumpet in terms of, you know, patting ourselves on the back. When I started in 2006/2007, the expected capacity of the landfill was at 2017. And if you look to our AUIR, it's at 2060, 2062 that we expect that useful life. So that gives us a lot of time to be able to plan and prepare for what the next step and the next evolution of solid waste disposal can be. And there's a little bit of -- I don't want to say hope, but there's an expectation that technology and technology advances are going to continue to allow us to push that useful life further and further. But that's one of the things that, you know, was a good-news story, because one of the other aspects is, I remember sitting in a meeting with Former County Commissioner [sic] Jim Mudd and a number of representatives from the eastern property owners, the Rural Lands Stewardship Area large landowners, and their greatest concern, one of their biggest issues was, where is this next landfill going to be? Because we were looking at it, you know. And we really didn't have answers for that. It's kind of like sitting [sic] of an airport, like I said. Sitting of a new landfill, that's difficult to do. But through the work that Solid Waste has done with their waste management partners, we've been able to extend that out, like I said, an additional 50 years and, hopefully, over that 50 years we'll find some additional technologies to help extend that moving further. And then, finally, adopted master plans and sustainability standards is what drives our coastal zone, which is our Category C, which is a unique commodity that sits out by itself. And this is one the last slides that I have, and this is related to the concurrency management proposal expenditures. As you can see, we've got a pretty aggressive schedule over the next five years, 5.A.a Packet Pg. 13 Attachment: 11-02-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27279 : November 2, 2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes) November 2, 2023 Page 10 of 48 not even including schools, which has -- has their own funding and their own program, but it is part of our Concurrency Management System. We have over $2 billion worth of capacity improvements scheduled for the next five years to handle the additional capacities. But if you look on the right-hand side, one of the things that we will -- we're going to have to tackle one way or another is there's about 500 -- 500 million that we have identified, but we haven't identified a funding source. So that will be something that we will have to continue to work on as a -- as a county government as a whole with the Board of County Commissioners to try to find the additional revenue to fill those gaps. What I can tell you, that that deficit is associated with projects that are in years 3, 4, and 5, so they're not the ones that we are letting out of the barn, so to speak. Those ones are the ones that we have dedicated funding to. It's the latter years of the next five years that we'll have to find additional revenue sources to be able to satisfy the projects to be able to main the levels of service that we have. And that is the end of my overview presentation. And I think the Chair had mentioned or had indicated that we traditionally go -- we'll go section by section just following the order of the AUIR, and I know -- I know Transportation and Stormwater and Utilities are here and ready to take over for me. But any questions that you may have on just the overview portion of the AUIR, or do you want to just jump into the sections? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Before I call on Commissioner Shea, the one thing that I have as a general overview, when the time comes for us, I believe, to vote to recommend approval, I'm going to ask that we attach a condition or at least some language that urges the Board of County Commissioners to make it a very high priority to find the funding for the funding shortfalls, because I don't -- I mean, we're -- at the end of each of these sections, it says what staff is asking the Planning Commission to do is to recommend this for approval. And I'm fine with that, because I think you guys have done a terrific job, but at some point we've got to -- I mean, we're, what, a half a billion dollars short on a five-year basis, and I think it behooves us to be sure that when we sign off, that we make the Board of County Commissioners aware of the fact that we were keenly aware of this and calling for some kind of a solution. And with that, I'll call on Commissioner Shea and then the Vice Chairman. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Yeah, that's kind of like a 25 percent shortfall. My comment is I just wanted to thank you for the summary. Usually we get all these individual reports, and we have a piece of paper on the side that we're trying to add them up and see how the overall -- next year it could use probably a little more overview of the whole program. But thank you for doing that, because we haven't seen that in the past. MR. BOSI: I will -- and I will defer that accolade onto Kathy, who, like I said, she's for sure taken over, but she's done a great job and has brought some individual improvements to the process that we're very pleased with. And so we'll accept it, but we'll accept it on behalf of Kathy. CHAIRMAN FRYER: And I second that observation of Ms. Eastley's work. Vice Chairman. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I just have a comment on, I believe, one of the issues that -- and I'm going to discuss for Stormwater, because I believe -- even though it's a huge amount of money, I believe it's an overstatement of the need. And why do I say that? Because this county, and most of the growth in this county for the last 25 years, probably even 30 years, has been controlled through -- through development of communities that require permitting through the South Florida Water Management District, and they had to deal with stormwater runoff, stormwater retention through the -- or through the permitting process. Those shortfalls are in areas that are older communities that have done nothing in regards to solving their problem, and somehow that onus is on the entire county now to solve what I would call local -- localized problems for lack of stormwater services in the older communities. So you're asking every taxpayer in the county to basically pay for what wasn't done in some of these older communities. I think the shortfall there should be made up by either MSTBU or other type of service -- taxing 5.A.a Packet Pg. 14 Attachment: 11-02-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27279 : November 2, 2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes) November 2, 2023 Page 11 of 48 authorities to focus strictly on those communities. And I've spoke about this before to the Board of County Commissioners. Because the -- like I said, most of the county that has developed through the PUDs that go through the permitting process -- even straight zoning that go through the permitting process through the state require stormwater management. That's an issue that's politically charged for our Board of County Commissioners. Are they going to have the entire -- because at one time we talked about a stormwater tax or a stormwater -- what was it? Proposed a couple years ago. There was a stormwater -- MR. BOSI: Was it a stormwater impact fee? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: No. It was a stormwater -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: Surtax? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: It was a stormwater tax that was going to be paid -- that was going to be added to the county, and our wonderful County Manager is going to come up and tell us about that. MR. BOSI: Well, I was going to say one of the benefits -- and I think what you've -- your indication of where you're going to go in terms of a stormwater review, luckily one of the attendants of the public is our County Manager, who stormwater is very near and dear to her heart. So I think she may have some -- (Simultaneous crosstalk.) COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Look over your shoulder. She's right behind you. MR. BOSI: I felt her coming up. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: No. So in that regard -- and I guess -- it may not be overstated. It is a requirement. The real issue is, does everybody pay for what was not done 40 and 50 years ago versus do we focus solely on those communities and figure out how do we raise revenue to solve the problems in those communities that didn't require permitting through the South Florida Water Management District and stormwater requirements? Now, that said, there may be other things that -- and improvements that would be certainly beneficial countywide, and I don't debate that. So that would be something that, yes, that we -- all the taxpayers ought to be paying for that. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Can I follow up on that? That is a question for you. In there was a package on responsibility, which canals, which areas. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yes. COMMISSIONER SHEA: And there was a huge group of green called "other," and I was going to ask what other is, and I think you just answered it for me. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: They were older communities. COMMISSIONER SHEA: But the community has the responsibility to maintain it? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: That's the debate. I'm not a -- I'm not an elected politician -- so it's a policy issue for our board. COMMISSIONER SHEA: That's the "other," though, on that? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: That's the "other." I don't -- Amy may be able to -- that was Amy's -- before she was the -- COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Mr. Chairman? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: -- appointed County Manager, she got to wrestle with all these issues. MS. PATTERSON: Thank you. CHAIRMAN FRYER: County Manager, before you start -- COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Mr. Chairman? CHAIRMAN FRYER: -- Commissioner Klucik wants to be heard. Go ahead, Commissioner. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Yes. Just -- I'm very curious to -- you know, to just have our memories refreshed about that. There was going to be a tax increase is what I recall regarding stormwater, and then somehow 5.A.a Packet Pg. 15 Attachment: 11-02-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27279 : November 2, 2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes) November 2, 2023 Page 12 of 48 that got deviated or postponed or canceled, whatever. And I am curious about, you know, just a refresher and what was proposed and then why it went away and, you know, what the plan at the time was, and then now what are we faced with because we delayed that or -- we didn't, but the county commissioners delayed or decided to deviate from that revenue source. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Manager Patterson. MS. PATTERSON: Yes. Amy Patterson, County Manager, for the record. So what we're talking about is the stormwater utility concept. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: That's what it was. MS. PATTERSON: So it's an idea that has been floated a few times in the past and unsuccessfully each time. The idea being that it is a statutory assessment, and it looks at the runoff that is specific to individual properties and basically develops a methodology to assess for the cost of that runoff. So post Hurricane Irma, there was real interest in development of the stormwater utility. It made its way all the way to the vote of the Board of County Commissioners when they elected not to move forward with it. In part, because of heavy opposition by Golden Gate Estates. There were some issues with the calculations for impervious surface in Golden Gate Estates that just couldn't be overcome. What makes the stormwater utility an ideal instrument in a perfect world is that, again, it ties the demand to, then, a fee that's collected. So it's very specific. There's a statutory methodology that has to be followed in order to be able to impose it. It is a special assessment, so a below-the-line. Not a tax, but a fee. I know, Commissioner McDaniel, if you're watching, I'm sorry, but it is a fee by statute. And so part of that, and what we were dealing with with the private communities, as Commissioner Schmitt is referring to, is the newer communities do manage and maintain their own stormwater systems. And so in this mechanism was -- or in this instrument was a mechanism to be able to address that to say that there was a credit, essentially, to those communities because it wasn't on the county to maintain them and, therefore, you weren't paying, they weren't paying, at the same rate as somebody that may be in an older community or where the maintenance responsibility was solely on the county. So that's a difference between something like Lely Resort and Golden Gate City. The numbers represented in the AUIR are a variety of projects throughout the county in older areas but also in our backbone system. So those are things like updates to our water control structures which benefits everybody in the way we control water, but also things like projects in Golden Gate City, which would be a complete rehabilitation of the stormwater system in an aging community. The infrastructure there is better than 50 years old and is literally crumbling in the ground. The other issue in Golden Gate City is they're on septic, so that's a multi-pronged issue and the subject of a very large master plan. Isles of Capri is another example that is in desperate need of stormwater updates, but they are also on septic. So these will become partnership projects with either our own public utilities or with the utility responsible for those areas; City of Naples, City of Marco Island. We have the same thing going on down in what we call the West Goodlette area. Partnership projects, removing septic systems and placing people on sanitary sewer by the City of Naples, but necessary stormwater upgrades for those folks who are -- in that case a really interesting situation is they're in the City of Naples Water/Sewer District, but they're actually residents of the unincorporated Collier County, so stormwater is our responsibility. And so those types of projects are what you see in the AUIR. Is there a better way to fund stormwater? Perhaps. And will we be revisiting the stormwater utility in the future? Again, perhaps, with an idea that we position it a little bit differently than the complicated way we went about it the first time, but also, again, as an attempt to really place that cost where those who benefit pay and those who are managing their own water don't, except they'll continue to pay property taxes. It's also a diversification of our property taxes, which -- property tax revenue, which are going to fund the stormwater programs both on the capital side of the house and on the maintenance side of the house. This also becomes a bondable instrument, should we head that way, which provides a sustainable 5.A.a Packet Pg. 16 Attachment: 11-02-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27279 : November 2, 2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes) November 2, 2023 Page 13 of 48 funding source. Last thing I'll say, one thing that has created part of this issue with stormwater is that during the recession, it was one of the areas that was most heavily hit in the reductions in their budgets, and it's very hard and takes a long time to recover from that, the inadequate funding. And when you're choosing between one health/safety and another, something has to give. There's only so much money to go around. But stormwater is still climbing back out of that position that they were in when there wasn't enough money to do projects, and we got further behind on maintenance. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Vice Chairman. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Great summary. I remember well. And you hit the nail right on the head, because combined with stormwater runoff is the other issue most people in this county don't want to talk about, and that is getting off of septic and putting most of those older communities -- get them off septic and onto water/sewer, which is a -- it's the third rail in this county when we talk about the cost and the impact fees. And without getting into great detail -- and you and I both know the history of that, and so do the rest of the staff on the cost. Especially Golden -- or the Estates; it was enormous what would be paid. And the issue becomes, do we, as an entire community, pay for it, or is it just to the people who are impacted and they pay. And, you know, we're talking 10-, $15,000 per home. And like that, the same thing when you look at -- and does the staff look at those communities that have CDDs? They're their own taxing authority. And we have many communities in this -- in this county that are CDDs that raise revenue to pay for those services: Roads, sidewalks, water/sewer -- not water/sewer but stormwater that are paid for in those CDDs by the people who live within that community. They pay for that -- that service that's provided. We have a lot of areas that -- the older areas in this county that don't have any type of taxing authority to raise that kind of money to fix some of the things that need to be done. North Naples is another great area. MS. PATTERSON: Naples Park. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Naples Park. MS. PATTERSON: Yes, twenty streets in Naples Park are underway in a massive capital project dealing with water, wastewater, and stormwater combined. Same thing happened off of Vanderbilt and the finger streets. They are all under county maintenance, county responsibility; stormwater, roads. So they're different than a lot of the gated communities where that goes on internally. That does come back to the county for our responsibility and our ongoing maintenance. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: And then for our board's edification, what was that, Amy, maybe 18 years ago the Dover-Kohl study for Naples Park -- MS. PATTERSON: Yes. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: -- where the county did propose to create some kind of a local taxing for the homeowners in that area for beautification, and there was going to be some money from the county as well, but it was overwhelming opposed by the community. And it was another area that we backed off. And here we are 20 years later still trying to deal with the same problem, homes that are still on septic, and stormwater. And I know the City of Naples is running through the same problems. So that's -- those are all policy decisions. Those are above our pay grade, I guess, is what I want to say. But they're all on your shoulder, by the way. MS. PATTERSON: They are policy decisions, but -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: In case you didn't know. MS. PATTERSON: Yeah. I think this is going to be an ongoing conversation as we look at -- we're at the end of the round of funding provided by the Board; $16 million provided to the stormwater capital program to really start to tackle some of these big projects. We're going to be closing that funding out this year, and that's going to open this conversation of what the future of stormwater is. Is it the stormwater utility? Is it an MSTU/MSBU, something like that? Something more sustainable perhaps than what we're doing. And, again, remember that behind all of this -- and we talk about capital -- is a tremendous 5.A.a Packet Pg. 17 Attachment: 11-02-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27279 : November 2, 2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes) November 2, 2023 Page 14 of 48 maintenance load. And there are a lot of the backbone portions of the stormwater system that are still our maintenance responsibility separate than the Water Management District, and that benefits everybody. So we have to look at each of these components separately, because every drop of water in this county ends up moving its way towards the Gulf of Mexico, and so that water-quality element and how we effectively manage that stormwater is a benefit to everybody that lives here. We just are trying to figure out how to rightsize that. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Thank you. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. MS. PATTERSON: Thank you. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you, Manager. I have a question, if I may. MS. PATTERSON: Of course. CHAIRMAN FRYER: This relates to persons per household -- MS. PATTERSON: Ah. CHAIRMAN FRYER: -- which is a subject that you and I have had, well, from my perspective, very informative conversations about over the years, and I certainly acknowledge your level of excellence and expertise. You come to your current job with a huge background in knowing how all of that works, and I learned a great deal about all that from you and also Mike Bosi and Jamie French and others. In the -- in the staff report, on Page 5 of it, there's a term used "persons per total dwelling unit," and that number that is offered here is 1.645. And the -- I am enthusiastic about this, and I want to find out where we are on an evolutionary process. Back when we were talking about the villages, it seemed to me as though Growth Management Plan amendments that were being sponsored by large residential developments wanted to show high occupancy and -- no, I've got that wrong. Vice versa -- low occupancy, and commercial GMPAs wanted to show higher occupancy to show the demand for the services. And it seemed to me as though it would be worthwhile if we could all agree upon using one number whether it's an advocate for commercial or advocate for residential. And the BEBR number is around 2.4, something like that. And I have learned from you, County Manager, and from Mr. Bosi and others, that that BEBR number doesn't take account of certain -- certain factors that need to be addressed, such as vacancy rates and the like. So -- and, of course, those factors do need to be addressed both by the applicants for residential and those for commercial. With this 1.645 -- I guess I'm coming to my question here -- does this indicate that we're maybe getting closer to a point where we can move away from the 2017 EMS numbers without embracing BEBR, which is too high? MS. PATTERSON: Yes, sir. So first of all, the benefit of the 2020 census, but the other exciting thing is is that every one of our impact fees is currently under study. So we are going to have the opportunity not only to look at the 2020 census as well as all new and refreshed data, but we're going to have a whole new set of impact fee studies coming forward that will let us have a look at how they compare to this as well as, in fact, how they compare to that 2016 EMS study, and we'll see just how far apart we are. There have been a lot of changes at the legislative level that have driven other changes to the way that we approach the impact fees. We'll be excited to share that with you in the, probably, upcoming months and how that relates to these persons per household or persons per dwelling unit numbers. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you very much. And, also, thank you for oversight of the entire staff effort to pull this AUIR/CIE together. It's always -- it's an admirable effort. It's very useful. To my way of thinking, it's most of the county's business operations. It gives us a chance to look at and react to. So thank you very much. MS. PATTERSON: Thank you so much. I probably will be back for EMS, if you-all are going to have specific questions on EMS. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Oh, good. Perfect. Thank you so much. Good. All right. Commissioner Schumacher. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: Ms. Patterson, I just had a question. Going back to 5.A.a Packet Pg. 18 Attachment: 11-02-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27279 : November 2, 2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes) November 2, 2023 Page 15 of 48 stormwater, two questions. The older communities, is it a question of responsibility where they're saying "it's not our responsibility" and the county's saying, "well, it's yours because it's your utility," or is it just a non-maintained item within that community that's now at a point where it needs to be revitalized? MS. PATTERSON: Generally not -- generally, it is county maintenance responsibility, so there's not -- there's not a question of the homeowners not doing what they're supposed to do. Now, we have had some isolated cases in older HOAs and things where they've needed help with some aging infrastructure and, of course, we stand ready to go in and provide that technical assistance. While the responsibility is on them, we do have teams that go out and assist. But areas that we're speaking about are ones that don't have a formal HOA. They don't have -- they're not private roads or private stormwater systems. They're actually under the maintenance responsibility of the county. And they're all over the place. Neighborhoods up and down Goodlette Road, for example; generally speaking, non-gated communities. And it's just a matter of prioritization and really getting our arms around what a maintenance schedule looks like. And Golden Gate Estates; huge maintenance responsibility in Golden Gate Estates for a network of swales. When we were doing the analysis for the stormwater utility, looking at our ability to be able to maintain those swales, the average -- or the best practice is maintaining a swale about every 12 years. Our calculation showed that we were being able to maintain the swales about every 50 years. So if I saw you today, I wouldn't see you again probably while I was alive. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: No, I understand because I live on one of those streets. MS. PATTERSON: Ah, yes. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: I know the idea behind Golden Gate Estates is obviously we can't clear more than 40 percent. You're supposed to retain your own stormwater. So on that impervious tax, is that just based off what the footprint of your house and patio was; whatever is a solid surface that can't absorb the water and then is watershedding off is where that tax would come in? MS. PATTERSON: Yes. So the stormwater utility attempted to capture all of the impervious area. But one of the things that threw it off in Golden Gate Estates, in some of the other areas, Logan, Livingston, people have very long driveways. They have gravel driveways, and some of those -- there are different opinions about whether they should be included into the impervious calculations. And so what you had was, if you looked at the stormwater utility fee, generally, for a single-family home, you were looking at a number that was under $100 a year if you, you know, lived in a community, but when you got out to Golden Gate Estates, some of those numbers were $1,000, $2,000 because of these long driveways or parking areas or other areas that were viewed as impervious. Now, we had developed a solution for that to be able to discount out a lot of the unpaved surface, the compacted gravel driveways, but by that time people were pretty upset, and the Board put a stop on it and looked at different ways to fund stormwater. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: Has there ever been thought of just putting it on that homeowner to maintain that swale and saying, you know, your swale's obviously overgrown, you laid sod where you weren't supposed to, you know, you need to correct this, instead of putting on the county's shoulders to go in and, lot by lot, basically, correct these swales? MS. PATTERSON: It is in the county's right-of-way, which is the first thing. And, frankly, the folks that live in these areas do us a huge service by keeping -- generally speaking, keeping their swales free of debris and other things and mowing them for us a lot of the time. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: My son does that. MS. PATTERSON: Right. But it also -- remember, too, is that those swales are all integrated with each other, and so elevations and all of that become important to make sure that the water can flow the way that it needs to, starting at a top of a street and making its way down to its point of discharge. So while somebody might be trying to do the right thing by maintaining their swale, it really is an integrated system and continues to be the maintenance responsibility of the county. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: Thank you. MS. PATTERSON: You're welcome. 5.A.a Packet Pg. 19 Attachment: 11-02-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27279 : November 2, 2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes) November 2, 2023 Page 16 of 48 CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you, County Manager. MS. PATTERSON: Thank you. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Mr. Bosi, do you have some more introductory comments? MR. BOSI: No more introductory comments. I just wanted to thank Joe for bringing up that subject. Like I said, it brings me back a bit. There used to be a time when the AUIR was co-piloted by myself and Ms. Patterson, as the impact fee manager. And I always thought that I was a lot better when she was at my side. But as you can see, there was a higher calling for her, and I'm still here. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. MR. BOSI: So, no. So with that, I think we could transition to transportation, if it's the pleasure of the Board. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Well, what I'd like to do, if I may, is to go through section by section, the first one being the staff report, and some of the -- some of the comments have already been made. I'll try not to duplicate what I've heard. And in some cases, they are clarifications matters that I received in my regular meeting with staff on Tuesday but I just want to make a public record of if anyone else had questions about that. So, Mr. Bosi. MR. BOSI: Ms. Patterson just asked me if I could request -- could we have a slight abbreviation [sic] of the order? The Sheriff's Office representative is here. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Absolutely. MR. BOSI: After the staff report, could we maybe start off with Sheriff, and then we can go back to the -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: Well, we can go right to Sheriff now. I mean -- COMMISSIONER SPARRAZZA: Sure. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yeah. Without objection, let's hear from the Sheriff right now. If they're ready. Good morning, sir. MS. WILLIAMS: Good morning. For the record, I'm Sean Williams, Central Services director for the Sheriff's Office. Unfortunately, I'm not as well diverse -- or well versed as Mr. Bosi, but we have a couple of topics to cover for you. I'll hit the high points on jails and law enforcement. Our responsibility as part of your process is to give you the narrative on what our needs are. So for Corrections, we provide you with the needs. Currently, we believe our needs for Corrections is we need a mental health and medical facility in our Naples Jail Center, the county's Naples Jail Center. We also need, I believe, some offices in that space. The trend in population in jails has not been trending where it needed to be originally. We believe that is due to several aspects. We have Chief Middlebrook and Director Bouza with us that could speak to some of that. But the mental health piece has become a growing trend in the jails, so we believe that's something we need to target. That's been something we've been looking at for several years and we've been unable to get some traction on. But as Ms. Patterson indicated, we are looking at the impact fees. We've been working with her staff to amend -- and we -- I think once that's done, we're going to be looking at the level of service after that, I believe, and I'd have to defer to them to speak to that. MR. BOSI: And just for the benefit of the Planning Commission, what I put on was the jail section does have a bed utilization rate that was provided by the Sheriff's Office, and you can see from 2020, 2021, and 2022. On average, in 2020, was 628 beds; in 2021, it was 668; and then in 2022 was 702. And, remember, the capacity for the -- for the system is at -- right at -- it's right about 13 -- 1,300 beds. And the only improvement that we would have scheduled right now is in the sixth year, and that's the Immokalee jail bed expansion. It's a predesigned 64-bed expansion that could be accommodated within the Immokalee -- within the Immokalee jail system. 5.A.a Packet Pg. 20 Attachment: 11-02-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27279 : November 2, 2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes) November 2, 2023 Page 17 of 48 CHAIRMAN FRYER: So the level-of-service standard is 2.79 beds per thousand population? MS. WILLIAMS: That, I believe, is right. CHAIRMAN FRYER: That's got a self-updating mechanism in it because, as the population grows, the need for beds grows, and I imagine that in your projection going out five years, you anticipated that the population's going to continue to grow. MS. WILLIAMS: That was the indication, I believe, prior to my taking over this. But we have not been trending that way for -- again, for various reasons. I think, good law enforcement practices changing and the needs within the jail. Again, mental health has become a bigger need. About 10 years ago, we had some changes in how we dealt with inmates. We were transferring them to state or federal facilities, getting them out of the county, as well as some court practices that I think Chief Middlebrook or Director Bouza could speak to if you needed them to. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. But you're showing a five-year deficit of 12 million. And so I assume that's on the back end. You're good to go for a couple of years, but then toward the end of the five-year period, you're going to need to find some money. MS. WILLIAMS: I would have to defer that to Mr. Bosi. MR. BOSI: And let me -- and that's the level-of-service standard, and that's the discrepancy. The utilization rate is a little over half of what our capacity is. So we have more available beds than what our -- what our needs are shown in actuality usage. But our level-of-service standard has a demand for a much higher level of beds than what we're utilizing. So this would be one of the areas where the Planning Commission could look at the level of service, and if you would request of staff to say, moving forward to next year, could you do some analysis work with the Sheriff's Office to see if there would be a potential and a comfortability with maybe reducing that level of service to provide for a more accurate -- in terms of the overall needs toward what's available capacity. Now, I will say that there's always been some caution from the Sheriff's Office related to the ICE program, and I could -- I guess I could turn it over, but I know that it's a federal program for how we move illegals through the systems. And if that program would ever go away, I know that there will always be a concern that could have a dramatic impact upon our beds and beds availability. MS. WILLIAMS: That, and if populations grow again, crime trends could increase. But I don't want to go away from the narrative that we provide that mental health and medical facility, that renovation within our Naples Jail Center is something we need to focus on for our facility needs for our current facilities. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Before we get back to that, County Manager, did you want to be heard on this, ma'am? MS. PATTERSON: Thank you, again. Amy Patterson, for the record. Building on that conversation, remember, too, that we're in the process of working through the design for the central receiving facility for David Lawrence. And I would suggest that this is going to enter into this conversation about the utilization of the jail and how it interplays when we are using that central receiving facility properly once it's constructed versus using the jail as our central receiving facility. There are a lot of different things that -- and we've been in conversation with the Sheriff's Office. There's a lot of different things that we need to look at in the jail in the configuration of those spaces, how they're utilized, how those inmates are separated. So I just want you to know those are ongoing conversations -- MS. WILLIAMS: Yes, ma'am. MS. PATTERSON: -- working closely with the Sheriff's Office and definitely taking into consideration that we have a level of service that may appear to provide capacity, but I think we're going to need to evaluate these things all together so that we can really get a handle on what that need is. And if at that time we need to have a conversation about level of service and beds per thousand population, that may be the appropriate time. We just -- we need to -- we need to really embrace this moving forward with the central receiving facility and then see how these intersect. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Thank you for bringing that up. I was also going to ask 5.A.a Packet Pg. 21 Attachment: 11-02-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27279 : November 2, 2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes) November 2, 2023 Page 18 of 48 about it. With respect to David Lawrence and St. Matthews, I'm reminded, and I know probably everyone in this room has heard Sheriff Rambosk say, that the largest mental health facility in the county has been the Naples Jail, which is an unfortunate reality. And it's also, I think, too soon to say that David Lawrence and St. Matthew's are relieving some of that stress. But can you give us an idea when in the future we might actually see some improvements in jail population, for instance? MS. WILLIAMS: I cannot speak to that. I have to defer to Chief Middlebrook or -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Well, if that would be appropriate, thank you. CHIEF MIDDLEBROOK: Good morning. Chief Mark Middlebrook, Collier County Sheriff's Office. There's many factors that go into the number of beds available, the cost associated. For instance, if we have a male juvenile, they have to be housed away from adults. That would take up one 32-bed housing area. If we have a male juvenile and a female juvenile, they can't be housed together, so now we take up two 32-bed housing areas. We have to staff that. So we have fixed numbers as far as staffing costs. So that all has to be taken into consideration as far as bed space. The 287(g) ICE program that we currently have here has cut our population in half. If that went away, within 12 to 18 months, we'd be at max capacity. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Interesting. CHIEF MIDDLEBROOK: We would not be able to house the number of people appropriately that we would have. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Thank you. Any other questions either on jails or law enforcement? MR. BOSI: And, Chair, just to remind you, from the law enforcement perspective, we do have a program -- and this was provided from the Sheriff's Office -- the need for the forensic and evidence facility, the District 1 substation. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yeah. MR. BOSI: The training facility, as well as the District 5 substation and an Estates substation, we are identifying those, and the one that we do have coming online in the first five years is the forensic science facility, the District 1 substation, and the District 5 substation. So they're -- we're trying to get to those individual areas of need, but we know that there is -- there is an allocation of revenue that constrains us from attacking that a little bit more aggressively. But we do know, and we're working with the Sheriff's Office to see if we can accelerate any of these projects. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. And I just -- it was clarified for me in our meeting on Tuesday that in furtherance of streamlining and reducing the number of words contained in this report, some things were removed without that to be indicating that the projects were removed or downscaled. And so that forensic evidence building, in last year's staff report, was referred to as a $33 million exercise, and I assume that it's still -- and it hasn't been cut back any. MR. BOSI: No, it has actually been expanded. It was 90,000-square-foot facility, as we were proposing last year. It's been increased to 114,000. So that has -- that's the relationship to the overall cost, but the size has increased as well. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Vice Chairman. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yeah. I just want to make sure we understand, and for the Sheriff's Office, our concern as the zoning board is to make sure that when we approve a project -- MS. WILLIAMS: Yes, sir. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: -- that it doesn't put a burden on you and exceed the level-of-service capability, and that's our greatest concern. MS. WILLIAMS: Thank you. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: All other data is extremely interesting, but our concern is that we don't want to approve something that then all of a sudden puts you in a bind because you can no longer meet the level-of-service requirements. 5.A.a Packet Pg. 22 Attachment: 11-02-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27279 : November 2, 2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes) November 2, 2023 Page 19 of 48 And every time we review a staff report, every one of these issues is covered in regards to level of service. But from that standpoint, I look at this as we are maintaining the level of service that's adequate. Your needs, of course, for funding are issues that go to -- of course, to the Sheriff and to the discussions with the Board of County Commissioners as far as funding. MS. WILLIAMS: Correct. We've been working with Manager Patterson over the last year and having some great conversations about some of these projects, so that is moving forward in a positive way. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: But I think the standpoint of our concern, the District 1 substation, as growth moves where it is now and that -- especially as it goes east, that the capabilities are there. The funding issue, we can stress from the standpoint of zoning. MS. WILLIAMS: Sure. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: But to make sure the level of service is there to provide what's needed for the community as it moves eastward now where it's going to go in this county, and that's down 41 and east. MS. WILLIAMS: Yeah. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. Thanks. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Let's see. Commissioner Schumacher. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: Just a question for Sheriff's Office. MS. WILLIAMS: Yes, sir. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: So on your staffing side, are you having -- with the number of beds decreasing per that report, staffing is acceptable within the jail, or are you finding a shortfall there, even with less beds being occupied? CHIEF MIDDLEBROOK: Chief Middlebrook again. We are sufficiently staffed. We have a robust HR program, recruitment, retention. Through the efforts of the manager and the commissioners, we are well funded. So we aren't having a staffing issue at all. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: And that kind of leads into this: So also with your road deputies, you're not having a staffing issue, especially with the growth we're kind of seeing out in that Golden Gate Estates. Would that be, like, District 2, I believe, or -- CHIEF MIDDLEBROOK: We are more than capable of handling the calls for service with our current staffing levels. It's always -- it's always an effort to continue to recruit quality individuals to come work for us. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: No. I know the deputies in my district are great, because I talk to them a lot when I see them at the 7-Eleven, but -- CHIEF MIDDLEBROOK: Always good to hear. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: -- in your other districts, you're not seeing any type of shortfall? Is there any other needed substations outside of the ones that were identified that you're looking at saying, this would a good area, given this growth, to have -- CHIEF MIDDLEBROOK: There are discussions about substations or sub substations as we go east. We continuously -- and this happens monthly -- review our calls for service, where the need is and what our staffing quantities are in those areas. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: Perfect. Thank you, Chief. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Commissioner Shea. COMMISSIONER SHEA: So I guess, in summary, what I'm hearing is, we shouldn't be worried about the deficit right now. There's a lot of moving parts that -- trying to attack that, and we shouldn't be worried about it at this level this year? MR. BOSI: I would agree with that assessment, and I think the Sheriff's Office does a great job of, you know, reducing that jail population. As I showed by that individual chart, it has steadily declined. 5.A.a Packet Pg. 23 Attachment: 11-02-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27279 : November 2, 2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes) November 2, 2023 Page 20 of 48 But through coordination and conversation with all the different moving parts and the individuals, the factors -- so we will bring -- we'll bring that to a head and have future discussions with you. But the capacity is there for the next 12 -- the next 12 months before you see the 2024 AUIR. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Vice Chairman Schmitt? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yeah. Since I've got the microphone, I want to publicly thank the Sheriff's Office, because I just returned from Los Angeles yesterday. I was out there. What a disaster. I mean, homeless areas, abandoned -- well, they're not abandoned, but campers on the side of the road where people are living. The people in this county will give you everything you need to prevent that from happening here. And if it -- if you don't get that, I would hope that you're standing on the desk of the County Manager, Amy, and the commissioners because, it's just -- it was just a disaster. MS. WILLIAMS: Thank you. And the Sheriff's Office focuses on the community. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: The tents and other things. And once that starts, it just -- MS. WILLIAMS: Yeah. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: It's like a feeding frenzy. It's just camp after camp after camp. And, anyways, it was not fun out there. So thank you for making sure that doesn't happen here, and that's what the citizens want -- MS. WILLIAMS: Yes, sir. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: -- that it doesn't happen here. MS. WILLIAMS: Thank you. And the Sheriff thank you as well. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Let's see. No one signaling at this time, so I'm going to ask a question. Now over on law enforcement facilities. MS. WILLIAMS: Yes, sir. CHAIRMAN FRYER: The LOSS is, excuse me, 0.9089 per capita, and that's square feet. Just, if you wouldn't mind telling me how that was calculated. MS. WILLIAMS: I'd have to defer to Mr. Bosi on that, sir. MR. BOSI: That is a level-of-service standard that we've had some modifications to in the past over the past four to five years. It was -- used to be officers per thousand. We've tied it now to officers, you know, per square foot, because what we provide for the Sheriff's Office is building and building capacity. So it's a more direct tie to the capital improvement programs that you are seeing. So that's been a -- that's been an evolving level-of-service standard. I think we've arrived upon the level-of-service square foot per capita for the last four years and that we think it serves it well, because it's directly tied to the capital that's associated with the programs that are contained within the AUIR. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. The Sheriff's Office has a facility in the 2300 block of Horseshoe. MS. WILLIAMS: Yes, sir. CHAIRMAN FRYER: And this is -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: There's a forensic lab there. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yeah. This facility, according to the material that I'm reading, has become a very dated and cramped facility. So I can see why you need a new facility for that. My question is, is, what's going to happen to that Horseshoe facility? MS. WILLIAMS: That's -- I would have to defer to the county's side on that, sir. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. MR. BOSI: And -- I was going to say, that's a facility management question, and I was looking back to see if Ed Finn or John McCormick -- I'm not sure if there's been -- I'm not sure what the level of discussion that's been -- MS. PATTERSON: The conversations are still ongoing about the use of that property once we have the forensic building completed and are able to relocate the Sheriff's operations. Potentially remaining in the county's inventory for relocation of staff out of the other leased space. The building does need some renovations; however, it's a good location close to both our transportation and our 5.A.a Packet Pg. 24 Attachment: 11-02-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27279 : November 2, 2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes) November 2, 2023 Page 21 of 48 community development campuses, and they are often space challenged. I do have a whole section in leased space right around the corner where we call West Horseshoe, stormwater, transportation planning, coastal zone are all there as well. So we'll look to potentially re-home somebody into that building as a county asset. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Sounds good. Thank you. I don't think I have -- oh, here's a question. The Collier County Sheriff's Office patrol district boundaries, I don't see District 7. Is there a District 7? MS. WILLIAMS: Not any longer, sir. District 7 became District 5 when we kind of restructured -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: Oh. MS. WILLIAMS: -- District 3, and District 5 now moved further west, and that district lives in a leased space, so that's why it's on the AUIR for future county-owned space. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. What about District 6? MS. WILLIAMS: Oh, that used to be Marco years ago. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Oh, okay. MS. WILLIAMS: That no longer exists. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Now they police themselves? MS. WILLIAMS: Yes, sir. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Got it. Okay. Thank you. That's all I have for law enforcement or jails. Does anyone else have anything for the Sheriff's Office? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: If not, thank you very much, sir, for being here. MS. WILLIAMS: Thank you for your time. Thank you, everyone. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: Thank you. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Shall we loop back now to staff report? I think most of my questions have already been answered, and the records that I want to make have been made. Let me just be sure. The numbers in the staff report show that there's more construction going on despite the slower rate of increase in growth. And as Mr. Bosi and his colleague explained to me on Tuesday, this is not being built for the present, but it is in anticipation of an inevitable increase in growth. So we're just trying to keep up with things. MR. BOSI: And as we discussed, what Commissioner Fryer was referring to is the average -- the 28,000 people we expected over the five years, but the population increase we have from a year-to-year basis is about -- you know, about 5,800 people. That would translate to about 3,000 individual dwelling units needed to -- assuming that they all moved into a new dwelling unit. But the amount of COs that have been issued for multifamily and single-family dwelling units exceeds that number, so there's a surplus being provided for. That's a positive thing. As we've described on almost every one of our petitions that have affordable housing, there's a tremendous imbalance between demand and supply, and that's a response from the private development community. So the more units that we can put out of the -- we can grow out of the ground, make available, can have a positive effect upon that supply and demand imbalance and has, hopefully, a positive effect upon, you know, the prices that could be commanded from a rental standpoint and the overall cost of homeownership. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. My next question has to do with schools. And this, I think, was another example of streamlining; some language was taken out from the previous year. But I just wanted to make a record of it in case anyone else noticed it. But there was a reference last year to quote, as well as a future school addition in Fiscal Year '25/'26. That was deleted. But it's my understanding that the project wasn't deleted. It's just -- it's no longer in the narrative, but that's still going forward. 5.A.a Packet Pg. 25 Attachment: 11-02-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27279 : November 2, 2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes) November 2, 2023 Page 22 of 48 MS. LOCKHART: We have actually two schools in our five-year plan, two elementary schools. We had an addition at Immokalee High School, and we also had plans for an addition at Palmetto Ridge High School. That will bring us to meeting our level of service within the next five years, so we're good. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you very much. I don't have anything further on the staff report. I'm ready to go to roads and bridges unless someone else -- if not, let's turn to roads and bridges. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Do we want to take our break now before we -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: Oh, good idea. Thank you, Vice Chairman. We will be in recess for 10 minutes until 10:34, please. (A brief recess was had from 10:24 a.m. to 10:34 a.m.) MR. BOSI: Chair, you have a live mic. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you, Mr. Bosi. COMMISSIONER SPARRAZZA: I'm here. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Noted. Commissioner Schumacher, I noticed some kind of flashing on your device. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: It's my dummy light on my phone when it rings. It flashing. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Oh, okay. That's what it was. All right. I was hoping that it wasn't a timer that connected to something that might hurt me. Okay. Thank you. All right. Roads and bridges. Did you want to say anything further on this, or we can go right to -- oh, would you -- COMMISSIONER SPARRAZZA: Lorraine is here. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yeah. May we hear from you? Do you want to say anything? MS. LANTZ: Sure. I do have a presentation if you'd like it, or if you wanted to ask questions. I did recognize -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: Tell us your name, and then -- MS. LANTZ: Oh, I apologize. Lorraine Lantz, Transportation Planning. Transportation Planning manager. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Why don't we start with, like, hitting the very highest points, and then we'll see if we can flesh out any questions rather than going through the whole presentation; is that possible? MS. LANTZ: Sure. CHAIRMAN FRYER: That would be great. Please do that. MS. LANTZ: Okay. So the high points -- and I will just -- I'll skip through and just show you some of the high points of our plan, because I did receive some questions regarding some of the projects that we are specifically working on. Our level-of-service requirements are D or E for our roads. We are currently moving towards projects to alleviate those deficiencies. Some of the -- or some of the deficiencies as you noticed in some of our attachments are in the eastern area of Collier County. And so to alleviate that, we have several bridge projects that are moving forward. These were funded through surtax referendum, and there are five moving forward. They are all working on their own design and project specifics. But they're from Wilson Boulevard South, 10th Avenue Southeast, 67th -- or 62nd, 13th, and 47th. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Could you say a word about how the bridges will help us in relation to getting over canals? MS. LANTZ: So these bridges were a part of a 2008 study for the east of Collier County -- East of Collier Boulevard Horizon Study to look at efficiencies and interconnections for the area, for fire, EMS, first responders. And these were the recommended projects that moved forward. So these are not to connect cul-de-sacs. These are to connect roads over canals for additional access so that someone 5.A.a Packet Pg. 26 Attachment: 11-02-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27279 : November 2, 2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes) November 2, 2023 Page 23 of 48 who's there is not trapped by only getting into their homes one way. They can have a different -- an additional option. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. I will -- and no one's signaling, so I'm going to make a comment or two here, if I can. I think -- I think this county does as much as it possibly can to facilitate the improvement of roads and villages [sic] given the obvious financial limitations that we have and also given the various laws that get changed in Tallahassee, which complicates it somewhat, in particularly how we look at deficiencies and what we can do, when we can do it, and what we can't do when deficiencies are on the horizon. And in those terms, our level-of-service standard, as was mentioned, is either D or E, pretty much, and that's a pretty low bar, which is unfortunate. But given our financing and the other constraints that I mentioned, it's really the best we can do. At some point in the future, maybe we need to strive for somehow doing more or doing better, but it's going to take more money, and that's where the rubber meets the road. Also, I notice the work program for '24-'28 is 742 -- 742 million and some change. Last year it was 538-. So, I mean, again, that's -- that's trending well for us. Unfortunately, on the backside, it makes it more, you know, challenging for us to say, well, now where is this extra money coming from? But I'm glad that at least we're planning to spend more on our roads and bridges because, indeed, that's going to be necessary. And as I mentioned earlier, when we make our recommendation, and assuming it's to approve, I'm hopeful that we can add a tagline to our vote that indicates the importance of forward planning because, while in the near-term years we're going to do okay, when you get out to years 4 and 5 and then beyond, if you look at the 10-year, it's going to get to be a real challenge, and it takes some serious forward planning now so that we're not surprised and caught back on our heels. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Mr. Chairman? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yes. Go ahead, Mr. Klucik. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Just when there's a chance, I'd like to ask some questions. CHAIRMAN FRYER: This would be a good time, sir. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Okay. So if you could help me out, just to -- Packet Page 16 and Packet Page 141, are those the same? It's 9A1B and 9A1C. I think they're the same chart. It's the '24-'28 plan. Is there any difference between them? I'm just asking because I don't want to miss something. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Let's get staff to respond to that. MR. BOSI: Yes. Mike Bosi, Planning and Zoning director. Yes, they are the -- earlier in the report is from the Transportation section. That's their program of five-year improvements, and then on the back side is the CIE submittal, which is a mimic of those plan -- five-year projects within the five-year plan, but they are codified within the CIE proposal amendment, which is the first five years, which is associated with the Exhibit A of the CIE. So, yes, they are. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Thank you. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Okay. And then how does that relate to Page 41, which is Attachment D, the work program? It seems like it's virtually the same thing but shown a different way as far as the work that's planned. MR. BOSI: They are. They are. D is a little more -- a little more specificity in terms of the work plan as to some of the underlying components of why they're being proposed, but they're essentially the same projects. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Okay. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: And then can you explain for me what A versus C is in the schedule notes where the -- it's the -- and, particularly, I'm looking at 60144, which is the widening of Oil Well between Everglades and Oil Well Grade Road. And I'm just trying to understand the distinction. There's -- so what does the A on that line stand for? MS. LANTZ: Sorry. I wasn't -- 5.A.a Packet Pg. 27 Attachment: 11-02-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27279 : November 2, 2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes) November 2, 2023 Page 24 of 48 COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Line 60144, 60144, it's Oil Well being widened from between Everglades and Oil Well Grade Road. MS. LANTZ: So we have -- the A in our -- oh, sorry. Lorraine Lantz, Transportation Planning. The A is an annotated advanced construction. So this is where we put money aside where we know the construction is coming, and we save money for that project in advance. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Okay. So -- great, great. Okay. That's what I was hoping. And then C is the -- MS. LANTZ: For actual construction. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Construction. Okay. So the 4,900 -- 4.9 million, I guess, is getting -- doing -- spending the money to get ready to do what you're going to do in Fiscal Year '27? Is that -- or are you actually doing improvements in that 4.9 million? MS. LANTZ: The 4.9 is for the advanced construction, so it's putting it into the savings account. In Fiscal Year '27, it's to start construction, so that's the beginning of the procurement phase and to start the construction. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Okay. So there's $4.9 million in expenditures and getting ready in 2024 for what you're going to do in 2027, or putting the money aside? MS. LANTZ: It's to put the money aside to basically hold it so that we have the money in place when we want to move forward with the construction. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Got it. Okay. And then if I can go to -- gosh, it's -- Attachment C shows the -- it's in red. It shows the traffic volumes for 2022. Is that -- is that -- that's showing the increases or decreases in traffic for Calendar Year 2022, Packet Page 40? MS. LANTZ: Yes. So the Attachment C is to show the increases. The increases are in red. The decreases are in green, and then those that are basic -- stayed relatively the same are in black. So the wider or the thicker the line, the more of an increase. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Okay. And what would you attribute -- so on Randall Road -- Randall Boulevard you've got 20 percent decrease between Everglades and DeSoto. What -- you know, are you -- you know, can you opine as to what it is that caused that decrease? MS. LANTZ: So it's year over year, so we're looking at the same times that we took traffic counts for the prior AUIR. This particular segment, there could have been additional -- people are distributing. They're moving forward with other areas or other access points, maybe using Oil Well, maybe going out Oil Well to 29. That seemed to have increased. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: And some of that might have been -- am I right, some of that could have been because there was some congestion there because the improvements were causing traffic to go in a different direction? Is that sometimes what could cause a decrease in traffic? MS. LANTZ: Yes. So obviously people look at what works best for them, and they may find a more efficient way to get to their destination. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Great. And then one last question -- I really appreciate you indulging me. These are very particularized questions to the community that always asks me a ton of questions out in Ave Maria. So then I look at Attachment H1 at -- I'm not sure what packet page that is. I think it might be Packet Page 50. I'm not sure. But it's another map, and it has orange and black and yellow lines. Do you know which one I'm talking about? Attachment H1, projected Collier County deficiency roads. MS. LANTZ: Yes, I have it. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Okay. So on that, if you can help me, so the black -- if you're looking at the legend, does it go from biggest concern down to lower concern as you go black, red, orange, yellow? MS. LANTZ: Yes. So the black tends to be the projects that were deficient in prior years, and they're remaining deficient. So we are -- and then those are the ones in which we are actively working towards our program to alleviate that deficiency. 5.A.a Packet Pg. 28 Attachment: 11-02-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27279 : November 2, 2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes) November 2, 2023 Page 25 of 48 COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Okay. And so what I highlighted earlier with that one budget line item for Oil Well between Everglades and DeSoto, that project is part of that black line that goes Oil Well, Everglades, Vanderbilt. That's all a capacity enhancement project kind of together is designed to take the burden off the -- those -- the congestion there? That's what that one big black line is? It's all the improvements that are slated that are already in the pipeline and they're on our chart; is that correct? MS. LANTZ: Yes. Those projects on Oil Well are moving forward through our work program. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Okay. And has anything changed? It seems like those have already been in the pipeline. Has that pretty much remained, you know, the same plan that they've had for the last couple years? MS. LANTZ: So the Oil Well Road project, specifically in that area, was a component of the Ave Maria development. And as soon as certain -- they had to pay impact fees. And as those impact fees were collected, we were moving forward with the design -- well, with analysis, design, and construction. We're still collecting those impact fees. They're not at -- I believe they had to be at a $20 million mark before we would start construction. We are now anticipating when they will reach that $20 million mark, and that's why we're moving forward with programming the construction of that project. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Okay. And when you say '27, are we talking the beginning of '27 or the end of '27, or you don't really know? MS. LANTZ: So our fiscal year starts in October, so that's what this is demonstrating, the fiscal year. The actual project might not start at the beginning of the fiscal year, but we're anticipating it to start during that fiscal year. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Right, which means -- and the fiscal year would end in September of '27. So by the end of '27, we certainly should all be seeing the progress there starting? MS. LANTZ: You might not see a bulldozer on the road. There might be more internal where we have to hire the consultant, make sure the contracts are in order. But, yes, that's the intent is for it to anticipate start. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Okay. Thank you so much. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you, Commissioner. Anybody have anything further on roads and bridges? COMMISSIONER SHEA: I have. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Go right ahead. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Trinity did a presentation last night that -- I thought was very helpful in terms of some of the -- like, 75 intersections, the plans for the flyovers, the diverging diamonds. It was pretty brief. But this is so high level. I don't know if the average one of us can put our -- really understand it. I don't know, is that part of the presentation you had similar to what she did last night? MS. LANTZ: I don't know specifically what she presented last night. I did have a presentation of the projects that we were moving forward with. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Because you're not talking about the state-funded projects, which are some of our more difficult areas, like the intersections of Immokalee and 75, Pine Ridge and 75, and there's some big plans in those areas in the next five years, and I'm guessing we don't see them in here because they're not our projects; they're the state's. But they're hugely impactful to our transportation. MS. LANTZ: So the correct answer is those are the FDOT projects. A lot were the Moving Florida Forward projects that I believe she may have presented. I did not include those in my presentation. But Moving Florida Forward did fund I-75 at Pine Ridge as a diverging diamond interchange. They also funded State Road 29 out in the Immokalee area for 29 to 82, as well as the New Market Road, what was originally called the Loop Road. That -- those two segments. That was Moving Florida Forward. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Okay. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Commissioner Schumacher. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: Good morning. A couple questions. So looking at Attachment H1, when we look at Vanderbilt, especially from Logan to Airport-Pulling, those -- remaining 5.A.a Packet Pg. 29 Attachment: 11-02-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27279 : November 2, 2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes) November 2, 2023 Page 26 of 48 capacity is 226 from Airport to Livingston, and then 204 from Livingston to Logan. Those obviously did not take into account the Ascend Naples project which had a trip count of an additional 100 cars or 106 cars, I believe. So that would obviously reduce the capacity on those numbers there, correct? MS. LANTZ: So our AUIR takes the numbers into account that are the -- we take traffic counts, specific traffic counts at four points a year, as well as anything that's come in for a Site Development Plan and that has been banked, those trips. I'm sorry. Attachment H is now on your screen. Sorry about that. So those -- that's what's taken into consideration. If they have come in for their site -- their zoning and approvals but have not come in with a Site Development Plan, those trips are at trip cap, and they have a development order where they can move forward to a Site Development Plan and development review, but we do not necessarily show those as a -- as a banked trip on the system until they come in for an approved Site Development Plan. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: Thank you. The Oil Well connection to Vanderbilt, are those -- does that include -- does the trip cap include that expansion as well, or is that something that isn't taken into account until the road's actually completed? MS. LANTZ: So the -- I'm not sure I understand your question exactly. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: Like, you have 204 remaining for capacity for Livingston to Logan on Vanderbilt. Does that include the completion of the Oil Well connection to Vanderbilt? Is that traffic counted in the capacity? MS. LANTZ: So the traffic count is the actual counts. So what's out there today, not Vanderbilt Beach Road extension that we anticipate is coming in. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: Okay. MS. LANTZ: And what that traffic would be anticipated, we don't -- COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: You don't know until you do a count after it's done. MS. LANTZ: Correct. It's actuals. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: All right. On each one where these areas are -- an enhancement project is scheduled, how do you do a capacity expansion on that? MS. LANTZ: So some projects are -- we're widening the road. So some facilities are being widened. Some facilities are -- it might be easier if I go through, but which -- COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: Like, for example, that -- obviously, the Oil Well is in black to Vanderbilt, the Vanderbilt Road extension, so that's obviously under schedule. If you look at existing deficiencies that I had kind of talked about from that Airport to Logan, if you've projected a deficiency -- I'm sorry; correct myself. How would you expand that road that's already built out? It's obvious that we're approaching capacity on that road if you take into account the Ascend that's already been complete is now going to go in for a Site Development Plan shortly, and there's another apartment complex that's going to push another 100 vehicles per their traffic count onto that road. So we're now above capacity, I guess, with those communities with the 200 -- 226 remaining. MS. LANTZ: So what we're going to -- we are -- in that specific area, I believe you're in a TCMA or TCEA area so that we understand that they may go over capacity, and there's additional activities that we can do, we're going to recommend. We acknowledge the deficiency, and we will continue to monitor and assess it; however, we would look for other strategies of transportation demand management such as carpooling, using the bus transit. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: Because there is no bus transit on that road now, correct? MS. LANTZ: Correct. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: Vanderbilt. Okay. That's all I have. Thank you. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. No one else is signaling. I've got just a couple of questions. No, disregard that; I don't. I have questions coming up in 5.A.a Packet Pg. 30 Attachment: 11-02-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27279 : November 2, 2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes) November 2, 2023 Page 27 of 48 stormwater. Anything further on roads and bridges? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: If not, then we will turn to stormwater. Are there questions remaining on this? We've already talked about it a little bit, but -- I think I'll start off with a question. I looked at the Attachment C of the 2022 AUIR, and it referenced a Table 2, which was captioned "current canal system inventory," and that table is not included in the 2023 AUIR. So my question is: Why not? MR. ROMAN: For the record, Dan Roman, stormwater project manager, supervisor. The one that you are referring to is the major structures. CHAIRMAN FRYER: It was called "current canal system inventory," Table 2, and so that's not a part of the 2023 AUIR. MR. ROMAN: So this is the current system inventory for the major stormwater that we have. Maybe it was mislabeled, and probably this is the one that previously was referred to when the question was who maintains it "by others." CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. MR. ROMAN: So the majority of -- when it says "by others" is FDOT, Alligator Alley, 41, and private stormwater systems. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. So the material that was in Table 2 is now reflected in a different image, and that was part of our material, I take it? MR. ROMAN: (Nods head.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. What about -- same question with respect to Table 4, and that was -- last year was labeled "current control structure inventory," and that table is also gone. MR. ROMAN: This is Figure 2. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Say again. MR. ROMAN: It's Figure 2, stormwater control structures. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Oh, it's called Figure 2 rather than Table 4. MR. ROMAN: (Nods head.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. All right. Thank you. Then the recommended revenues for '24 through '28 are 37 million, 637. Now, that number was 84 million last year. Could you -- could you comment on why the reduction? MR. ROMAN: Some projects move further away, and given that stormwater is not an enterprise fund, we have to just basically plan with a budget that it's given to us from the General Fund. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Anyone else have comments on this section, stormwater? If not, it would seem that we are concluded with that. Oh, go ahead, Vice Chairman. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Are you responsible or can you give me a status, what's going on with the project that was started several years ago for the restoring of the Belle Meade flowway? There were monies that the county received. I think it was part of the settlement in the gulf for the oil spill, and there was some -- there was a project for restoration of flow through the Belle Meade and then down. MR. ROMAN: Yeah, it's called the Restore project. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yeah. MR. ROMAN: So the county was moving forward with a selection committee to award that design, but now we're just reevaluating the scope as there has been a lot of development in that area. We just need to go back to the study and reevaluate the scope to make sure that what we're proposing, it's in accordance with the current development in that area. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. And then there was -- there's work that's already being done by South Florida Water Management District over restoration of the flowways, and that's going out the East Trail. There was additional pipes and other activity being sponsored, of course, by the Water Management District. I would hope that's being integrated with your plans and the work that's being done in that part of the county. 5.A.a Packet Pg. 31 Attachment: 11-02-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27279 : November 2, 2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes) November 2, 2023 Page 28 of 48 MR. ROMAN: The Picayune project that they have, it's not part of the restore. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yeah, I understand that. But it is still some work that the district is doing. MR. ROMAN: Yes, sir. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: That -- MR. ROMAN: But what I'm referring to is the water that we're planning on capturing -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yeah. MR. ROMAN: -- is not going to be basically the -- on the area of the Picayune Strand because they have certain capacity. They have some habitats there that are sensitive. So we are not planning on -- the water that's going to go from -- go down from Restore is not going to be part of that Picayune. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. I mean, I just look at that as another source of revenue that's still available to the county. I don't know, Amy, were you going to talk about that? I saw you get up. Captured you again. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Stay close. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: You're not going back to the office. MS. PATTERSON: Amy Patterson, again, for the record. No, I was just going to provide you clarification on last year's revenue why that number was higher. It still contained a debt component, so that was that remnant of the $60 million that the Board provided in debt funding, how we were continuing to spend that down. It will be gone for this year. So that number came down because of it -- not because of the Board allocating less dollars, but rather that piece now being spent all the way. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you very much. MS. PATTERSON: You're welcome. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Anything further on stormwater? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: If not, potable water is the subject. And no one is signaling. I don't think I have any questions or comments. COMMISSIONER SHEA: I have one. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Do you? COMMISSIONER SHEA: They're not going to do a presentation? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Well, if you want them to. COMMISSIONER SHEA: No, I don't. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Actually, I do have a question or two here. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: My only concern is the level of service again. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yeah. Well -- and that's pervasive. That goes through all this stuff. Yes, sir. MR. STOLTZ: Anthony Stoltz, Collier County Public Utilities Planning. The 2023 potable water and wastewater AUIR demonstrates that Collier County Water/Sewer District is in compliance with the concurrency requirements found in Florida Statutes, Section 163, the Collier County Comprehensive Plan and the Land Development Code, and we are here to answer any questions you may have. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Go ahead, Commissioner Shea. COMMISSIONER SHEA: So it looks like a lot of your projections are all population based, so the treatment process is still population based. But there's a lot of changes coming out, like the PFASs and things like that. Do you envision having to do any upgrade in quality that won't really increase the capacity of the facility, but it will increase the level of treatment? I didn't see any of that in there. And I guess my question is, do we have PFASs in our water? And it would be the same question for wastewater since they go together. MR. McLEAN: Yeah, very good question. COMMISSIONER SHEA: And the sludge that comes out of the treatment plant, so... MR. McLEAN: Matt McLean, division director for Engineering and Project Management. 5.A.a Packet Pg. 32 Attachment: 11-02-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27279 : November 2, 2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes) November 2, 2023 Page 29 of 48 PFAS and other chemicals are definitely hot on the topic list around within the overall industry. Currently, right now, our water systems are clean. We don't have any issues relative to that. We are looking, as we do our plant expansions, to go into membrane treatment processes at the wastewater plants, which will position us to be able to handle future PFAS regulations as they may come down the pipeline for us. So we're positioning ourselves to be prepared for that. Currently, it is not under our regulation, but it's under study to add regulations soon. COMMISSIONER SHEA: There will be regulations, but most of our water is groundwater, which shouldn't have PFASs in it. MR. McLEAN: That's correct. COMMISSIONER SHEA: So you don't have any concern with any upcoming regulations, and our level of treatment will stay probably -- you're projecting it will be similar, but you just need additional capacity as the population grows? MR. McLEAN: Treatment processes will definitely continue to change with those types of additional regulations as they come forward. That's why we are moving towards more of a membrane treatment process on the wastewater side as we do future expansion projects. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Are we finding more brackish water and saltwater intrusion so that we might have to upgrade our water plants to handle the salt? MR. McLEAN: Very interesting. Within our potable water systems, we utilize multiple different aquifer sources, freshwater sources, Tamiami aquifers, as well as brackish water sources with the Upper and Lower Hawthorn. So right now, today, we are actively utilizing brackish water within our potable treatment processes. We currently continue to be regulated by the Water Management District when it comes to water use permitting, and additional wells, as they come online, will continue to be a mix and blend of both freshwater and brackish water sources. COMMISSIONER SHEA: And long range, we're not -- we see enough capacity in the aquifers -- I know we're going to add some wells, but we see enough capacity in the aquifers, not just in our ability to pull the water out? MR. McLEAN: We do. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Thank you. CHAIRMAN FRYER: I have a question with respect to the table. Again, comparing last year's report to this year's. This is the eight-column table; it's on Page 56 of what I'm using. And Column 1 is labeled "Fiscal Year" and Column 8 is labeled "Percent of Total Permitted Capacity." Last year, it went from 2018 to 2032, and the peak last year was in 2027, where we hit 77 percent. Then in this year, the peak has moved to 2032 where we're going to hit 87 percent, but then we're going to come way down the following year to 75 percent. Could you comment on that? MR. McLEAN: Yes. When it goes back down -- I think you're on Packet Page 79. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Could be. MR. McLEAN: The continued increases relevant to that are reflective of when we have plant expansion. So as plant expansions come online, then we have a larger percentage of total permitted capacity there. I believe that's the table that you're on. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. So it's a just timing of -- MR. McLEAN: Timing of plant expansions and when they come online. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Thank you. Excuse me, how does the county assess the presence and adequacy of untapped aquifers? I mean, is that a science? Divining rod perhaps or -- MR. McLEAN: It is. It's a science, and we have experts in the -- in the industry that we hire as consultants to continue to work through the geotechnical aquifer availability of water sources, and it's highly regulated by the Water Management District through water use permitting. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Thank you. And I'm ready to move on to wastewater. Anyone else have anything on potable water? 5.A.a Packet Pg. 33 Attachment: 11-02-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27279 : November 2, 2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes) November 2, 2023 Page 30 of 48 (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: If not, wastewater. Let's say what I have here. This may be a County Manager question. It first comes to my attention here, but it is in other materials. I simply had not observed in previous years how much debt we had, either bonded indebtedness, commercial paper, and the like. Not that there's anything wrong with that. It's just that I hadn't -- I wasn't aware of what a significant part of our budget that played. I would like for someone to comment on the prospects of continued reliance on debit, particularly as interest rates are going up. MR. BELLONE: For the record, Joe Bellone. I'm the utilities finance director. We, as an enterprise fund, have two very limited income sources. They're either user fees or impact fees. We do have some existing user fee debt service covered by user fee rates, and we've got some leftover expansion, which are covered by impact fees. We do those rate studies regularly every three years because we're responsible for ensuring that we have adequate funding to do that. We are going to rely on additional debt for these expansions that are in the program. Timing of those, again, will depend on the demand but we, as a utility, don't walk alone. We usually work together very closely with the Finance Committee, the county's financial advisors, to develop debt strategies for the utility to ensure that we get the best rates that we can. We are AAA rated, so that does ensure that we have -- we are borrowing at the lowest rates possible. General Fund is as well, but the utility is AAA rated. So, yes, we will rely on that, and we will look at -- we will rely on all of our financial professionals within the county and externally that we use to assemble the best packages that we can. CHAIRMAN FRYER: There's nothing at all wrong with using debt to finance operations. In fact, it's very wise, particularly when rates are low. I guess my question, I'm hopeful that now rates are rising and, again, with our very high credit rating, do we have some nice rates locked in? MR. BELLONE: We have refunded several of our previous bonds. And, again, thanks to the support from the Finance Committee and our external county's financial consultants, we have refinanced several bonds at more favorable rates. We continue to review those constantly to ensure that we're not -- we're not paying more than we need to be paying. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. MR. BELLONE: Sure. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. MR. BELLONE: Sure. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Let's see. Anyone else have any questions on wastewater before we move to solid waste? If not, solid waste it is. And I was interested to learn about how solid waste disposition can now occur in ways to take it above ground level to form berms or hills in this otherwise flat part of the world. But maybe a word or two about the aesthetics of that would be -- because it sounds like it's a great way to increase our capacity, and our capacity is well within what we would want. But are we going to see more hills and berms and -- COMMISSIONER SHEA: Same ones, just higher. CHAIRMAN FRYER: The same ones, just higher? Could you say a word or two about that? MS. HODGSON: Good morning, Commissioners. For the record, Kari Hodgson, your director for Solid Waste. As Mike has alluded to, with the success of county planning, that being able to expand your existing assets and infrastructure to maximum the benefits to the county residents, the landfill is a great example where, in 2011, the permitted elevation of the landfill was around 108 elevation above ground, and the Board of County Commissioners approved the landfill to apply for a permit to raise that elevation which is, in turn, what gave it an additional 20, 30 years of capacity. Landfills are a very sophisticated engineered design like any other utility and has liner systems in place as well as 4-1 slopes that are then maintained with grass, so they look like hills, essentially, with benches on them for stormwater control. They have all the assets that must be controlled with any other 5.A.a Packet Pg. 34 Attachment: 11-02-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27279 : November 2, 2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes) November 2, 2023 Page 31 of 48 type of building construction. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Are any of them designed to be, like, plateaus where you could -- you could build improvements on top of them? MS. HODGSON: Absolutely. There are a few landfills in Florida specifically that have assets that have been built on top of them. More recently, Orange County is looking to put a surfing facility on top of an old landfill. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Just -- we built a golf course on West Palm on top of the landfill. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Interesting. Okay. Anybody else have questions on the subject of solid waste? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Well, we're moving right along, everyone. MS. HODGSON: Thank you. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you very much. The next subject is Collier Schools Capital Improvement Element. I must admit, I don't dig as deeply into this as I do the other because, I mean, well, we've got Amy here. And as the expert, and I -- and I'm confident that if we're short-changing the school in any way, that she would -- she'd let us know immediately; is that fair, Ms. Lockhart? MS. LOCKHART: That's fair, and it's covered in the packet, our capital improvements that we plan on putting in place in the next five years. As I had said before, two elementary schools are within our five-year plan, and across the district we meet our level of service at each of our schools. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Vice Chairman Schmitt. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yeah. I just want to point out, oftentimes we have the public come in. If it's not the environment that they talk about, it's the impact on schools. I trust that the county -- the school board, which, of course, is a separate constitutional entity, and I commend the school board, as they always had done in past years, the county staff, coordinating with the school board staff, to ensure that the capacity was there. And if it wasn't there, we, again, need to know that from a voting standpoint that we don't approve projects that exceed the capacity. And I think we're -- we're well on track for making sure that there's desks available. Now, with that said, do you also impact -- or do you also analyze the charter schools and all the other types of programs that are taking place as well? Because, again, that's -- usually the mantra we hear is the impact in schools and overloading of the schools, but it's not happening? MS. LOCKHART: It's not happening. There are a few schools -- and that's why we're going to be building new elementary schools -- that have some overcrowding issues, namely the Estates and Laurel Oak Elementary School. Corkscrew Elementary is also getting close. So we monitor all of that. The charter schools, to answer your question, we do not -- have not expended capital funds on charter schools. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Correct. MS. LOCKHART: That is not part of the capital plan. There is a flow-through now of capital dollars that's available now to charter schools, but that just flows through the district to the charter schools themselves. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. But you do monitor schools -- MS. LOCKHART: We do monitor -- we do monitor their enrollment. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Population, enrollment. MS. LOCKHART: Yes, we do. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. Good. Thanks. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Are we ready to move on to Parks and Recreation? It seems like we are. MS. EDWARDS: Good morning, Olema Edwards, Parks and Recreation director. With our AUIR, the most notable changes that we have is that we're going to have a deficit in our community parkland resources by Fiscal Year 5. To correct this issue, we are currently in negotiations 5.A.a Packet Pg. 35 Attachment: 11-02-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27279 : November 2, 2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes) November 2, 2023 Page 32 of 48 with the Williams Farm property to try to acquire land. We are good for our regional parkland acquisition. We're fine. We don't have any deficits, but I'm here to answer any other questions that you may have. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. You've got a surplus, right? MS. EDWARDS: Yes, sir. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Well, that's a nice position to be in, I must say. MS. EDWARDS: Only for regional parks right now. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Oh, yeah. MS. EDWARDS: Yes, sir. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Go ahead, Vice Chair. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: The Golden Gate Golf Course, will that now fall under Parks and Rec? Will that be managed -- I don't mean daily operations, but will that become a public facility? Is that the plan for that? MS. EDWARDS: Currently, they have -- currently, there are different uses for the golf course. We're using it right now as a passive park. COMMISSIONER SPARRAZZA: Right. MS. EDWARDS: We do have it, but I think they are planning on building a veterans nursing home on top of this land and stuff, so it would be divided out as it goes. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: But the remaining 14 holes or whatever, will that now be managed under the Collier County Parks? MS. EDWARDS: As of right now, yes. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Are there -- I'm sorry. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: But, I mean -- MS. EDWARDS: Going forward -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Are you budgeting forward? Because, you know, to run a golf course -- MS. EDWARDS: Right. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: -- it's a million, a million and a half dollars a year, and that's on the cheap. Maintenance, you know -- MS. EDWARDS: I'm going to defer to -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: -- treatment, all the other things associated with it. So I just want to make sure that these numbers are taken into account, the potential impact of bringing that on board. MS. WILLIAMS: Yeah. And actually, the County Manager is standing behind me. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Say your name for us, please. MS. WILLIAMS: For the record, Tanya Williams, Public Services Department Head. Thank you, sir. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. MS. WILLIAMS: County Manager is standing behind me, and she can talk more specifically about the Golden Gate Golf Course facility because it will turn into a multiuse facility. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yep. MS. WILLIAMS: Parks will maintain a certain portion of that, but I'll let her explain how that's going to be sectioned out. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. MS. PATTERSON: Hello. Amy Patterson, again, for the record. When we finalize plans for the portion of this property that will remain as a golf course, there have been a couple of different schools of thought. Originally, you may recall that there was a proposal for a BigShots facility similar to a Topgolf. That was also going to include them operating the 12-hole golf course built by the county. Since BigShots has left and we've reconfigured the placement of various buildings on the 5.A.a Packet Pg. 36 Attachment: 11-02-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27279 : November 2, 2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes) November 2, 2023 Page 33 of 48 property, we're now openly exploring how we're going to place the 9- to 12-hole golf course on the property with the move of the veterans nursing home. It is not the intent of the county to run the golf course ourselves. There will be an operator that will do that. It's wholly outside our wheelhouse to operate a golf course, but it will remain as part of the Parks' inventory. So we'll own it, and we will hire someone to operate it. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: All right. Question answered. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you very much. Commissioner Schumacher. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: Good morning. I'm trying to see, is there any indication of improvements to current parks in this report that's filed? MS. EDWARDS: No, sir, not right now. No, sir. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: No? Is there any improvements planned for Veterans Community Park? MS. EDWARDS: We do have some improvements. It's minor. But not anything major as capital-related projects. We're looking at lighting right now, but that's about it. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: That's about it? There's no talk for baseball fields being redone or -- MS. EDWARDS: No. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: That's been an ongoing conversation for a decade. That I can tell you. And I apologize. I don't want to sound gruff here, but, frankly, my point of view is if you carry "veterans" on the name of a park, it should probably be the best-looking park in the county. MS. EDWARDS: Understood. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: And, quite frankly, the only thing that's "best looking" over there is the pickleball courts. MS. EDWARDS: I understand. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: The rest of the park is -- the fences have fallen down. We had fences that were falling off dugouts that had to be replaced. We've had a number of challenges out there at that field. The stormwater does not drain, and it's something as simple as the crushed PVC pipes on the west end of it that have fallen in, which caused it to flood out, and then we just recently had a four-day irrigation leak that has now resulted in, like, 200 or 300 feet of asphalt being ripped out that's wide open and getting fixed right now. MS. EDWARDS: Right. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: So -- MS. EDWARDS: Well, going forward, we will do what we can. We have a lot of life/health/safety issues at all of our parks that we're taking, so we are prioritizing what we can do, as I said, right now. Currently, we're working on lights for Veterans, but I will take your comments and note it, and we will work on a plan to get that corrected. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: Okay. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. No one else is signaling at this point, so I think we're ready to move on. Thank you so much. MS. EDWARDS: Thank you. CHAIRMAN FRYER: I believe the next subject area is going to be Category A facilities under the CIE, and I think most of this is in the nature of summarizing what we've already seen. Mr. Bosi, did you want to tee it off? MR. BOSI: No. I was just going to say, what you have within your CIE is you've got your Exhibit A and your Exhibit H. Exhibit A are your five-year plans, which are all summarized within your sections within the -- within the Category A components of the AUIR, and then H is your 6 through 10. Those are the future projects that are anticipated from each of your Concurrency Management Systems. But there are -- there are subjects that you guys have been discussing previously. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Sure. I have a question. This is on Exhibit A under roads and bridges. There is a -- on the revenue side we show three line items that begin with the word "transfer." Could you 5.A.a Packet Pg. 37 Attachment: 11-02-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27279 : November 2, 2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes) November 2, 2023 Page 34 of 48 tell me where those are transfers from? MR. BOSI: I'd have to turn to Transportation Planning for that. But is this the Attachment A you're referring to? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Exhibit A, then the first one, which is roads and bridges, yeah. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Packet Page 140. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yeah, thank you, because my pages don't jibe. COMMISSIONER SPARRAZZA: From your IRA, I think. CHAIRMAN FRYER: What? Oh. Thanks. COMMISSIONER SPARRAZZA: There's no "from." There's only "to." MS. LANTZ: Lorraine Lantz, Transportation Planning. While Mike is getting it up, I believe there was a transfer from 112, which was some landscaping that was transferred into a road project, as well as there was some transfer to be consistent with budget guidance. And so that was previously known, I believe, as a different fund. It was maybe 310 fund, and now it's moved into a different fund number, and so that was the transfer. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Okay. Then there -- about two or three lines down there's a line that says "unfunded needs," 295 million. No, that's not what I want to talk about. I want to talk about the line immediately above that that says carryforward, 313 to 310, impact fees. Could you explain the carryforward? I didn't realize that we sometimes ended up with more impact fees than we needed. MS. LANTZ: So I believe that some of that carryforward funding is -- I'm sorry -- 55 million. All right. So it's funding that we had started to collect and, moving forward, so that when we get to actually doing the project, the funding is available -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: Oh. MS. LANTZ: -- to be spent. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Oh. So, I mean, you've got it banked, so to speak. MS. LANTZ: Yes, sir. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. No one else is signaling at this time. And -- oh, I know. Exhibit A, again, this is under roads and bridge projects, and this is the project-by-project number. You know, 60,212, numbers like that. My request for next year would be that you also include the segment number that ties back to Attachment F. MS. LANTZ: On this graphic or -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yeah. I'm looking at the Exhibit A collector roads and bridges projects, and it lists the projects and their amounts to be expended up to Fiscal Year 2028, and it appears that these addresses are going to also be occupying space on segments, and it would just be nice for me, because I try to follow the segments from the standpoint of what's aiming toward deficiency, if we could see a segment number as well next year. MR. BOSI: And we can attempt to do that. This is a CIE. The CIE has a specific format the state would like -- that we present to the state. We tied that -- we tie those projects back within the component of the transportation section in a more visual and connected way. Within the CIE, we don't have that level of specificity. We can look into it to try to see in terms of the segments that are going to be impacted. But for what the state wants to see, the state wants to just see, what are your capital projects, where are the funding sources, and then what are the revenue sources associated with that. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. I understand, then, why we're where we are. And if it is too much work that would need to be put in to do that, then don't do it. But it would just be helpful for those of us who follow these segments and know numbers by heart like, well, 44, would be interested to be able to match them up with these projects. But, you know, if you can, do; if you can't, I get it. Let's see. Does anybody have anything on the CIA schedule -- CIE Schedule A numbers? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: If not, then, let's see. I think we've already talked sufficiently about jail and correctional and law enforcement, and libraries, also, I think we've talked -- unless anybody wants to say something more about libraries. 5.A.a Packet Pg. 38 Attachment: 11-02-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27279 : November 2, 2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes) November 2, 2023 Page 35 of 48 MR. BOSI: And, Chair, on the screen, I've got the summary page up. There are no proposed -- we have sufficient inventory to satisfy the additional demand that's provided with some surplus of 4,358 square feet associated with that. So there are no improved programs. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Good, good. And I think -- I expect that the time will come when we'll be able to subtract some square feet from what is needed for libraries, thanks to technology and the kinds of things that are being checked out of the library and how they're being checked out. MR. BOSI: And that's an ongoing conversation the library staff is having with the Board of County Commissioners in terms of the changing utilization of the library space and the value that's associated with it in terms of where we see the library utilization for the general public purpose of going in relationship to the content, the amount that we have for the physical books to the electronic books that are more and more popular. So it's a constantly evolving process, and it's one of the things that we're going to continue to talk with the Board of County Commissioners and the Planning Commission about that, our level of service for libraries and how they're utilized on a changing basis. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Thank you. My next subject is EMS, and I believe the County Manager will lead us through this. And I have a few questions, although so many of them are really age-old questions and age-old problems. County Manager. MS. PATTERSON: Commissioners, Amy Patterson, again, for the record. If we want to start with your questions, that may lead into -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. MS. PATTERSON: -- more insight on some things that are changing in EMS. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Good. Good. I have a few. And no one else is signaling, so I'll lead with mine. MS. PATTERSON: Sure. CHAIRMAN FRYER: And, again, a lot of these questions there is no good answer to because, like everything else, it depends upon the availability of funds and money. And as everyone knows, EMS has historically needed to borrow from the general operating accounts in order to provide the services at the desired levels, and that's just a conscious decision that's been made by the Board of County Commissioners, and it is what it has to be. Looking at the number of units that -- well, I guess my first question has to do with the number of 16,400 population, one medic unit per, and that number's been around for a long time. Is that still a good number? MS. PATTERSON: So that number will be revisited again as the impact fee studies come forward. EMS has suffered with three distinct levels of service, which is really an interesting situation. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yeah. MS. PATTERSON: One is their actual level of service that we can use for the AUIR because we're allowed to count the stations that are leased as well as the stations that we own, because they do factor into those response times. The second is that number you're referring to, which is the level of service driven by the stations we own and under which we assess our impact fees. And then, of course, we have a response time level of service, making this one of the most complicated AUIRs to deal with, trying to juggle all of those things for their various purposes. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Understood. I noticed in here that, whereas, in previous years we've either gone to owned or leased, and now we're looking at co-owned which I think makes more sense to me because of the value of real estate. I think that's a good position to be in. Is that why we're doing it? MS. PATTERSON: There's a number of reasons why, and there's actually a little bit more information on this. You-all may know that we recently hired an executive director of public safety who has an extensive background in fire rescue. He is now the lead in both emergency management and EMS as well as the liaison to the fire districts and the Sheriff, and he brings with him insight that I think is really 5.A.a Packet Pg. 39 Attachment: 11-02-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27279 : November 2, 2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes) November 2, 2023 Page 36 of 48 going to help us as we move forward in this process, and I think you'll be pleased. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Good. MS. PATTERSON: But the collocation does help both us and the fire districts because the lease arrangements only benefit one. If they own it and we're there -- unless we can get a long-term lease, it creates all kinds of complexity. So this collocation idea is one we're really running with, but we are working on an idea that, essentially, we all commit that we're all going together where we go. So if North Collier is building a station, EMS is going to be there. If EMS is building a station, the fire district of where that station is, that fire district is going to be there, and this is going to be a standing agreement amongst us, number one, to be more efficient and, number two, to cut down on some of the complexity of this leasing, collocating, co-owning. It's been quite difficult to deal with, so I feel like that conversation is very positive and is going to lead to allowing us to put medic units in places where we traditionally have not had them but there is actually space for them. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Good. I'm very glad to hear that. I remember, and others may as well, the tension that was produced as a result of the proposed moving of Engine House 40, which is North Collier, and that -- you know, what does that do about the ambulance? Because the ambulance runs a lot into the City of Naples. And so those of us who live in the City of Naples were wondering, well, are we going to lose access to that ambulance? But, fortunately, they're staying at their current location. Are they going to open another engine house where they had proposed to move 40? MS. PATTERSON: I am not sure. I know that the places that we're working with North Collier are out in the eastern part of the -- of the county. Actually, near one of our other locations on DeSoto, there's another station planned out there closer to the villages where we will also plan to collocate. And recently, with the approval of a land-use petition, North Collier has property on 41 near old -- not near Old 41. That's where our location is, but on the northern portions of 41 where they plan another station where our plans are to collocate there as well. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Oh, okay. So, I mean, North Collier has Engine House 43 up there, I believe -- MS. PATTERSON: (Nods head.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: -- which is almost to Bonita Beach, and so we would be putting another collocated engine house/EMS house in that? MS. PATTERSON: On 41, they have a piece of property that was part of that -- part of that land use. Cocohatchee. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yeah. Yeah. COMMISSIONER SHEA: (Unintelligible.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Well, no, I don't think so. I think that's something different. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: No, I believe it's land that the developer donated. COMMISSIONER SPARRAZZA: Donated it to them. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Somehow I thought that was -- that was east of there, but -- so this is -- this is land that was donated by the developer? MS. PATTERSON: (Nods head.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Donated or sold? MS. PATTERSON: Donated. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Then I'm confusing multiple projects. Thank you. I got it now. So we're at 26 ambulances. We need to get to 31 in five years, and it's going to be quite a challenge. Are there any federal grants or state grants available out there that we can -- MS. PATTERSON: Yes. So we are actually working on Station 74, which appears in this document. That is the DeSoto station. That is a -- it's a three-part collocation with Greater Naples and North potentially putting an apparatus there. We are pursuing a legislative appropriation for that project. It is a very large and expensive station. I will continue to pursue grants where appropriate to be able to stand these up. But, again, with 5.A.a Packet Pg. 40 Attachment: 11-02-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27279 : November 2, 2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes) November 2, 2023 Page 37 of 48 the relationship with the fire districts, we view that here in the near future that we're going to have the ability to place some more medics units in places where we don't currently have them. There are a number of fire stations that have place for us where we may be able to put an additional ambulance. The big challenge here is the hiring of people. Last year, we granted 24, 26 positions to EMS to be able to start to stand up additional ambulances and fill some of those funding shortfalls that they had, and hiring folks has been a bit of a challenge. So we've been working on different ways to incentivize hiring to bring people on. And so they have some vacant positions that we're looking to fill. As we fill those positions, it's going to give us the ability to stand up more trucks. So even without having to build stations, the ability to get more ambulances out into these areas, particularly those that are growing and are challenged and do cause difficulties with the movement of our trucks throughout the county when we get really busy, will be very, very, very helpful and, again, the fire districts have been very receptive in these conversations of allowing us space and to stand those units. Our dream, of course, is to stand up some seasonal units and potentially to look at a future BLS truck. So there's a lot in work here. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Oh, really? BLS trucks. MS. PATTERSON: Yes, sir. Yep. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Interesting. So is there any -- well, is -- by way of background, Collier Boulevard is a dividing line, I think, between our 8-minute and our 12-minute response time goals. Is there -- is there any possibility that we could be able to populate the eastern part of Collier County sufficiently to get that response time down? MS. PATTERSON: Yes. And our new chief feels very strongly about that dividing line being a geographic boundary and not truly one that's driven by population. Immokalee is densely populated, but they have a 12-minute response time. So, yes, that is, I would say, in his -- in his top five of priorities is looking at how we handle that and to deal with the growth in the east and the impact that it has had on our units and our need to move units around this county. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Remind me, do the Sheriff's deputies have AEDs in their cars? MS. PATTERSON: I believe they do, but I would not want to speak for the Sheriff. I can find out for you for sure. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Commissioner Sparrazza. COMMISSIONER SPARRAZZA: Thank you. Quick question, if I understood this correctly. Collocation is relatively new, and you're moving forward with that at all locations, or you're trying to? MS. PATTERSON: Collocation itself isn't new. It's the way that we approach it from the financial side of the house that has evolved. We have traditionally had ambulances at fire stations. A lot of times they were owned by the fire districts, and we were there through a rental agreement or a lease agreement. Now, that creates all sorts of difficulties for us on the level of service side of the house when it comes to impact fees. We could talk about this for hours, and, believe me, you probably -- you don't want to. So we had moved to a collocation model where we were in co-ownership or in long-term leases. What we're trying to do is continue on with that collocation but try to simplify this down and basically come to agreements that we're all going to be together wherever we're going, and we try to come to unified lease terms and/or if we build a station, we make space for fire; fire builds a station, they make space for us, eliminating this need for all of these complicated arrangements. It gets us to the same place for the purposes of response times and levels of service, but it cuts out a lot of the bureaucracy involved in all of these arrangements that have evolved over time. COMMISSIONER SPARRAZZA: And that was leading me to my second question, because just driving around the beautiful county, you see, usually, fire truck or two, and an EMS together. And I -- when you started to refer to collocation, you're really talking about the financial business end of it, not physically, because they're already, many times, physically together. It's whether the ambulance is leasing back from the county or the county's leasing -- okay. Very good. 5.A.a Packet Pg. 41 Attachment: 11-02-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27279 : November 2, 2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes) November 2, 2023 Page 38 of 48 MS. PATTERSON: Yes, sir. Yes, sir. COMMISSIONER SPARRAZZA: Thank you. MS. PATTERSON: Now, the conversation about how we move forward in different types of partnerships -- because, yes, to your point, you see a fire truck. You may see a squad. You see an ambulance, and then we talk about how they respond out together. All of these are conversations that are ongoing on how we deliver the best and most efficient service to the residents of Collier County together. COMMISSIONER SPARRAZZA: Thank you very much. CHAIRMAN FRYER: On serious calls, breathing problems, cardiac problems, and others, the dispatcher will send not only an ambulance but also a fire suppression vehicle, and those are almost all, if -- well, maybe not Immokalee, but almost all ALS equipped. And so when we count our 12-minute response time, for instance, to the rural area, the parts of the county to the east, that's the first ALS unit to respond. They can defibrillate, they can start IVs, and do other thing. They can't transport, but they can do all the other things. And fire trucks are always -- almost always going to get there before the ambulances, are they not? MS. PATTERSON: There's a lot of -- we're heavily saturated with ALS units, particularly in the urban area, with those ALS capabilities, so, yes, and they do stop the clock. And part of this conversation is, number one, getting more medical units but also is the inner workings of how we work with each other to deliver that service without what can appear to be redundancy or not the most efficient use of the taxpayers' resources. So -- and that -- that help from the fire districts, when used properly, lessens the stress placed on us having to move medic units around the county when we get really busy. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Understood. I guess two or three days ago Marvin Easton published a third letter -- opinion letter to the editor in the Naples Daily News, and I think together -- and he's a very well-respected international consultant who has been involved in working on various committees and commissions over the years to look at quality of fire service and EMS service. And he -- he is -- well, first off to say, fortunately, there have been a number of mergers recently, and so that's a good thing. You know, various departments that used to exist have consolidated down to either five or six. I'm not sure the exact number. But he's calling for even more. And it's -- you know, from my perspective, which is just as a reader of the newspaper, it seems to me that that's a good idea. I was wondering what the county's position is on it. MS. PATTERSON: We're open to all conversations about how we better cooperate. We have been having regular meetings with the fire districts, with the cities because they have their fire folks as well, even with the Sheriff on how we plan, how we work together, how we work together differently. Consolidation, which is a word that causes people to have a bit of anxiety, does not have to be a bad thing. It definitely isn't a bad thing. So we like now to use the term "enhanced cooperation," and we're moving those conversations along in how we're looking at how we respond to calls, again, how we're locating together and all of those ways that we can perform more efficiently. So stay tuned for those conversations. I feel like they're really positive steps that are happening, and I think we'll have good news to deliver to you as we move through this process. CHAIRMAN FRYER: And there's been good news also developing with respect to what technology can bring to the party. And the Sheriff's Office dispatches all the fire districts, fire departments, and EMS. And so not only do they have their computer-aided databases that show where the closest units are, closest appropriate unit, but they also have the capability to dispatch under what's called automatic mutual aid. And just as -- it's automatic. If you -- if you have a medical call, for instance, in the City of Naples, and the two Naples EMS vehicles are -- well, if the Naples -- if they're out fighting a fire, another fire suppression apparatus will come in along with the Naples-based EMS, and that will be automatic. So you get the closest available unit even if they're not consolidated, which is the good side of the story. The not so good side of the story is sometimes it results in disparities between what taxpayers are paying in millage. Some areas, some districts consume more benefits from mutual aid than they give back, and that's 5.A.a Packet Pg. 42 Attachment: 11-02-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27279 : November 2, 2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes) November 2, 2023 Page 39 of 48 the kind of thing that perhaps could be -- could be better achieved in the event of consolidation. But having said that, I know it's highly political, and there are all sorts of variables involved. But I wanted to bring it out because it's something I think that's important for us to think about. MS. PATTERSON: Absolutely. And we will be meeting with Mr. Easton again coming up here soon to talk about some of those things that, you know, he's been asking questions about -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: Good. MS. PATTERSON: -- and can give him an update on our progress together. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Good, good, good. Thank you. Thank you, County Manager. I don't have anything further on EMS. Anybody else? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: All right. Thank you, ma'am. MS. PATTERSON: Thank you. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Let's see. I go to county government buildings, and I don't think I've got really much of anything on this to say that hasn't already been said, because a lot of this is just recapitulation. So no one is signaling on that, which takes us to Coastal Zone Management. And, again -- oh, I do have a question about this. You know, in light of Ian -- did you want to make a prefatory comment? MR. BOSI: No. But if -- any questions, we have Andy Miller here, who is the manager, so -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: Good. All right. Ian, just like Irma previous to it, was a big drawdown of our reserves, correct? MR. MILLER: Correct. And, for the record, it's Andy Miller with Coastal Zone Management. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. And so having drawn down those reserves, we need to replenish them before the next one hits. And, I mean, these forecasts are built on five-year projections. And, you know, we may or may not have enough for this year or next year but eventually, as is in the case of almost all these other resources that we have, by the time we get to year four and year five, we need to -- we need to be having some new money found. We don't want to lower our LOSS. I mean, I don't. I think it would be a terrible black mark on the county if we had to do that, and I don't think anybody wants to. But either you do that or you raise funds somehow. So having said that, sir, do you want to comment on my comment? MR. MILLER: Yes. And, you know, we work with a fairly healthy reserve, but it did take a hit last year from Hurricane Ian and, specifically, we did a lot of good work, and we spent the county's money, but the good news is, I think we're looking at some reimbursements from the State of Florida and some reimbursement from FEMA to offset some of those expenditures. We've got some pretty promising grants either in process or in the bag from FDEP to the tune of $10 million, and FEMA has given us a preliminary obligation of $8 million, so we're already up to 18 million out of that 20-plus million that we spent. So that will go right back into reserves and pump us up for the short term. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Have we recovered everything from FEMA or any other sources that we had expected to get from -- first I'll ask you about Irma. MR. MILLER: From Irma, I can't really answer that, although I know we did have some difficulties because of the timing that we completed the work, and so I think we're going to have a lot better results from what we accomplished with our grants folks and Ian. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. So there's more money coming in on Irma, and you feel like you're on top of the issue? MR. MILLER: That's correct. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Then on Ian, I imagine there's been a smaller percentage of our total recovery at this point, am I correct? MR. MILLER: And I think I want to reverse what I just -- what I just said was that we had some issues with getting grant reimbursement from Irma related to the timing of the work that we accomplished and the requirements from FEMA and the like. Ian is a totally different story. We reacted immediately and work very closely with FEMA. 5.A.a Packet Pg. 43 Attachment: 11-02-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27279 : November 2, 2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes) November 2, 2023 Page 40 of 48 And so, like I said, we're looking at grant reimbursements somewhere in the neighborhood of $10 million from the state that are already pretty much a done deal, and then FEMA has indicated that they are obligating $8 million for our emergency berm work as well, and so we're doing a lot better job with Ian than Irma. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Could you speak briefly about -- and the vice chairman may want to weigh in on this as well -- but the interplay between the FEMA money and the hurricanes and the study group that he is a member of looking at how to harden our coastline. MR. MILLER: What I can tell you is that FEMA will not be in the mix as far as what Army Corps -- they're two totally -- as a matter of fact, when you bring on an Army Corps project and get obligated, authorized, FEMA is pretty much out of the picture. It's totally Army Corps that comes to the rescue on those. Up until that point, up until we actually construct, if we do, our resiliency project, FEMA will still be in the mix. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Did you want to say anything more about that? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Well, he's correct. FEMA responds to the disaster. And if it's declared a federal disaster, typically the Army Corps of Engineers is the entity that FEMA turns to to do the assessments and to respond. And Public Law 84-99, Public Law 93-288, the federal response act, or whatever it's called today, the federal response plan, and it has all the categories, FEMA controls those various response categories, one of which you referred to, the Army Corps of Engineers, is typically shore protection and debris cleanup and all the other type of things. FEMA is the overarching manager, but the -- is not involved in any way in the core study, the feasibility study, that's going on right now. FEMA's not involved. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Thank you. That's all I have on Coastal Zone Management, and that actually brings us to the end of this exercise. Oh, Commissioner Schumacher. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: Mr. Miller, if I could ask you a question, please. On the Fiscal Year '24, it's showing beach renourishment at 3.8 for Parkshore and 100,000 for Clam Pass. Is there -- is that just because it's a smaller section from Seagate to the top of Clam Pass there? Is that why there's only 100,000 budgeted for it? MR. MILLER: That's correct. I think Parkshore is in the order of maybe two miles, and Clam Pass is maybe a thousand feet, something like that. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: And when are those scheduled to occur? MR. MILLER: They're not scheduled because -- as a matter of fact, the sand that we lost from Irma was primarily the dunes, and so the sand that was the beach proper wound up offshore. And so we did annual monitoring this year, which is basically a survey effort. And the monitoring came in that says you really don't need -- especially with the 400,000 tons of sand we just put on the beach for the berm, we don't necessarily need to do these renourishment projects. So we've got them in our budget. We'll revisit the beaches in January and have our surveys done then. And if the engineering consultant tells us that, hey, you've got a hot spot in Parkshore or otherwise, they'll recommend a renourishment project, and we'll do that. But the funding is available. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: Has there been any conversation on increasing the size of that berm height-wise? And let me skip to the end. Naples Cay, we had $60,000 in damage from Idalia. I was there for the surge. It was a 4-foot surge on top of a king tide, and it came over top of that dune and submerged our entry road with about 2 to 3 feet of water, and then it about took out our FPL box, too, but there was just zero protection there. So is there any conversation of reanalyzing those areas to say, hey, maybe we should bump this up a little bit and make it a little higher for this section here? MR. MILLER: Well, I think the conversations that are headed in that direction are more associated with the CSRM project. They're talking about -- they were talking about it in the previous effort of having berms in the neighborhood of Elevation 12. Ours that we just put in are Elevation 6, so that's a huge difference. The issue is, as you raise the berm, you're either robbing from the beach or you're going to need 5.A.a Packet Pg. 44 Attachment: 11-02-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27279 : November 2, 2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes) November 2, 2023 Page 41 of 48 to widen the beach out into the gulf to retain that design standard that we have; that is 100 feet in some places and 85 in others. And as you widen into the gulf, you widen towards the offshore hard bottom, nearshore hard bottom. And so we're kind of -- we have these design constraints that limit -- limit us to some extent on how wide and how high we can make the beaches. There's probably opportunities to do what you just -- what you just mentioned by making the dunes higher, making the beaches wider, impacting the hard bottom, and then mitigating for the impacts to the hard bottom, so that's kind of the ongoing discussion. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: Okay. Thank you, sir. MR. MILLER: Yes, sir. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Vice Chairman. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yeah. Just to clarify, we do not have any federally authorized projects for beach renourishment in Collier County. All of the beach renourishment and shore protection are county projects. There's nothing that has gone through any type of federal type of authorization or appropriation. That's what the study is, of course, looking at and whether there's going to be any type of improvements through the feasibility study that's ongoing. But the monies certainly that -- the monies are not federal dollars. They come from either the General Fund or tourist taxes or wherever the county raises the revenue to do the shore protection projects. MR. MILLER: Yes. They're tourist development -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: When I mentioned FEMA and I mentioned the Army Corps of Engineers, if there's a federal disaster and there are disaster dollars to solve one particular issue, there are opportunities to have federal money do specific things. But, typically, it does not happen unless it's a federal project, and that's under Public Law 84-99, which is the coastal management type aspects of where they can have emergency dollars come in and repair dunes and types of things. But we don't have any of that in Collier County, and that's a choice that the county has made for years not to -- not to use federal dollars. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: I appreciate the clarification. The issue that I've seen is when you look at the Army Corps of Engineers plan, it stops at Seagate and doesn't go to Clam Pass which, therefore, cuts all of Naples Cay out. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yeah. But that, again, is a -- that is a decision of the local sponsor. The local sponsor being -- the local nonfederal sponsor is the county. And if the county wants to look at things beyond what is being proposed, that is the -- that has to come from the -- that has to come from the county as the nonfederal support. Jamie. MR. FRENCH: Thank you, Commissioner. For the record, Jamie French, the -- I'm the department head for Growth Management/Community Development. The relevancy study currently underway with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is within my purview under our resiliency group under Chris Mason. We spoke yesterday with the Naples City Council about this. That study will go all the way just south of the Gordon River. So, Commissioner Schumacher, it is inclusive. So the study, perhaps, that you're mentioning is the study that was never completed, but that is not this study, so that we're clear. This is a study that currently -- (Simultaneous crosstalk.) MR. FRENCH: This goes beyond Gordon River, sir, so that's going to be beyond -- well beyond Clam Pass, 8th Street, all of those others. So it is inclusive of that -- COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: You're thinking of south. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yeah, you're talking about north. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: You're south. I'm next to Pelican Bay. MR. FRENCH: I know exactly where you are, and it goes all the way up the coastline. So what 5.A.a Packet Pg. 45 Attachment: 11-02-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27279 : November 2, 2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes) November 2, 2023 Page 42 of 48 I'm saying is that it is a much more comprehensive area that will cover the coastline of Collier County, and that study, we will not make comment on that study because we have nothing to comment on. We are currently within that study period. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has not produced anything yet, and once they produce their report, at that point -- and we're so appreciative of Commissioner Schmitt being on that committee. But we have monthly calls with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and that is available to the public. There are members from the City of Naples as well as City of Marco on those calls. And there are also -- we have biweekly calls, so every two weeks, and the Naples as well as Marco Island staff are on that call. So they do have an ongoing every-two-week staff call with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and then we have a monthly open-to-the-public call, and all of that information is published by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Just to clarify again, the study will study whatever the county would like the Corps to study, but they have to stay within the statutory requirements of the $3 million, 2.98 or whatever it is. MR. FRENCH: It's a 3 by 3 by 3. They have three years, and they have $3 million to spend, and they have made it exceedingly clear that Congress has not expanded their time or their dollars. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: They have a funding limit requirement, but they'll study whatever the local sponsor would like to study, and that's -- apparently, right now, the movement, predominant pressure, I believe, that the Corps is getting from the number of people who participate in the conference calls is for nonstructural alternatives. MR. FRENCH: Higher, wider beaches. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Resiliency and other type of nonstructural alternatives, so that's the direction that the Corps will move, and that's based not on the committee. We advised the Board -- we were -- the committee was formed to advise the Board, but the Board -- in essence, the county staff, but the Board is the -- for all intent and purposes, is the nonfederal -- entity that's deemed the nonfederal sponsor, and that's who the Corps will take direction from. MR. FRENCH: You are absolutely correct, sir. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: And if the county doesn't become the nonfederal sponsor, the Corps could look to another taxing authority, whether that's Marco Island, the City of Naples. And that's -- that's what the study does. I can get into great detail about the study, the process, and whatever else, but from that standpoint -- and we're looking at, right now, Jamie, 2025? MR. FRENCH: We anticipate -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Final report? MR. FRENCH: We anticipate their preliminary report probably around April or May of next year, and at that point that will give us something to work off of. But understand that this is beyond just local citizens that have been here a lifetime, let's say. But these are -- we've got a number of skilled contractors as well as engineers, from Ken Humiston to Josh Maxwell who came from Turrell Hall who's now with another firm. These -- the representation that exists on this advisory committee is exceptionally strong, and they're very tied to this community, and certainly not to lean on Joe or to lean on Ken Humiston, but there's no one that knows these studies better than those two, no doubt. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yeah. And the -- understand -- again, for the Board's edification, for us, the study is just that, a study, then it has to go through -- it goes through the final -- it goes through what they call the chief's report, chief of engineers, and it goes through the budgetary process if it's -- if the local sponsor agrees to sign the agreement to become the local contributing nonfederal sponsor. Then, if the project is, quote, finally approved as a congressionally authorized project, the next hurdle, of course, is the funding for it, authorization and appropriation. Appropriation is entirely different. At any given time, there might be 800 to 1,000 authorized projects on the books that are not funded. So it could be an authorized project but never funded because there's dollars that -- there's other projects that compete. And in reality, when you look at the state of Florida, the monies that are coming into Florida, when you look at the dollars, and the money that is being spent either in Lake O or on Everglades 5.A.a Packet Pg. 46 Attachment: 11-02-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27279 : November 2, 2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes) November 2, 2023 Page 43 of 48 restoration, that's a huge amount of federal dollars that comes into -- or comes into the state of Florida. I have to say, this would probably not be up there in the competing category against other requirements. So there's -- I hate to be a -- kind of pour cold water, but the fact is, the study will be the study, but the difficulty will then be getting the dollars appropriated, and that could be years away. MR. FRENCH: Well -- and thank you for that, Joe. Part and parcel to that is that we're also -- we're also participating in the state resiliency program where we're looking at the vulnerability of our coastline and those that would be inclusive of stormwater elements and those areas -- and so that the county recently recognized a $50,000 grant to go towards a study. And we've contracted, I believe, with Wood Engineering, which is very familiar with the state of Florida. In fact, they do most of the modeling around the state of Florida and work closely with the state. So we are working with our chief resiliency officer for the state of Florida, his staff, on looking at that as well. Clearly, it might be a capital element that we would recognize in the future hearings of AUIRs, but at this point we are simply measuring now. So we are well underway. We are very versed. As many of you know, our group is also responsible -- we are not first responders, but the community, as it was put recently when I visited the Florida Legislation, think about it like an iceberg. There's still -- what you see is the storm, the water, the damage. What you don't see underneath of the water is the rest of the iceberg, and that's the recovery portion, and it's monumental. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: I'm still in it, trust me. MR. FRENCH: And I would tell you that the best and worst day in my career is when Joe hired me, right? So I had no idea what I was getting into, but I could tell you that Hurricane Irma took us better than four -- better than five years, and on the day we issued our last roofing final, along comes Ian. So these are not quick fixes, the recovery piece, the assessment piece, the habitability piece of these communities. We're very highly trained and skilled in that area. We can always improve. Clearly, we're not infallible, but I would tell you that we take this vulnerability piece -- because that helps us as well on getting our community stood back up from both a socioeconomic portion but also just structural safety of our community. We get it. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: Thank you, Mr. French. I'll ask you after the meeting. I've just got a couple other things. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Vice Chairman? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Jamie, I have one other question; different subject, different issue. And I saw the numbers of the certificates of occupancy, the COs issued by year. Is the trend line, from our standpoint, the zoning, the things that we have approved -- and I know when we think about what we have approved over the last 18 to 20 months along Collier County -- or along Collier Boulevard and other areas in the east. My question is, where are we on a standpoint of -- is it going up, is it steady, or going down on building permits and certificates of occupancy? MR. FRENCH: So it's kind of a -- it's a two-part answer. So you've got to consider the COVID factor. There was a great migration where we saw across the nation in 2019 and '20, for the first time in the history of Collier County, what we saw is we saw some areas, such as California, outpacing Wisconsin and New York, and that's -- you know, go west, young man, where they were coming back home. At the end of the day, we've seen that start to balance back out. So year over year, we're about 13 to 14 percent down in transaction value and about 10 percent less in revenue dollars. Now, I refer back to revenue dollars because we're -- I like to brag about it, so I'm going to do it again. We're the only group in the entire county that has actually not only kept our fees, but we've reduced our fees in eight years. And I know that the County Manager is shaking her head saying, oh, gosh, what are you doing? But at the end of the day, we pride our -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: She's running out. MR. FRENCH: Yep. We pride ourselves on not just being able to provide good service, but efficient service. It could always be better. But when we look at that, if we go back pre-COVID, we are on that same growth pattern. And 5.A.a Packet Pg. 47 Attachment: 11-02-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27279 : November 2, 2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes) November 2, 2023 Page 44 of 48 so when we see these Site Development Plans, we see the entitlements come forward for consideration, we know that we are 12 to 18 months out before we actually break ground and start to go vertical. So we are well positioned both financially as an organization, as an enterprise organization, to have a level of stability within our staff to support new growth as it comes in, but hopefully we don't go through what we saw in 2009/2010, but we're not there. We track commodity markets. We recognize everything from concrete to lumber on what that market's doing so that we can better forecast not only the skill of employee that we need but also what additional buildings we would need to house them as well as how we're going to be able to provide that level of service. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Good. Thanks. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Did you want to say something, Mr. Bosi? MR. BOSI: (Shakes head.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. We're at the end of the line here. I want to say just a couple of things and then ask for a vote. And what I'd like to say is to extend a word of extreme thanks and confidence in the job that staff did, and by that I mean the County Manager and her office, the Growth Management office, Jamie French, Mike Bosi, Ms. Eastley, Ms. Cook -- MR. FRENCH: All her. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Jaime Cook, okay. Everyone did a terrific job on this, and we're all constrained by finances, you know, but that's a serious issue, and we've got to confront it. My sense of things is that we're going to be okay for the next couple of years, but when we get out more toward Year 5, by then we need to have some solutions in place other than lowering our level-of-service standard, which we don't want to do. So at this point I would entertain a motion. And before anyone makes one, think about whether -- whether in our motion we want to simply recommend it for approval and send it to the Board of County Commissioners or add a reference to our concern about the later years and the five-year plan, or is that simply a statement of the obvious? And if it is, it might not be necessary. So with that, unless anybody else has concluding remarks, I'd entertain a motion. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Well, I'll just -- on the discussion on your point, Mr. Chairman. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yeah, go ahead. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: It sort of is a statement of the obvious, because every year we do the AUIR. It is -- as Mike just said, it's a capture, it's a snapshot. But if you go back every year for the last maybe 15 years, that's always been an issue. And, of course, our board, our Board of County Commissioners, they have the tough challenge of remaining millage neutral and whether tax value of property goes up or down, but at some point, yeah, they may have to decide to raise the millage rate, which is very unpopular. But I guess we could point something out that, yeah, the out-years don't look very healthy, but I have to say two years from now it's going to be the same thing. And I think we'll be -- we'll be healthy. So I don't know, maybe it is a statement of the obvious. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Thank you. Commissioner Shea. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Probably a question for Mike. I always get astounded by the size of the unfunded revenue that's required. Is this normal at the 25 percent level? If you went back over every year we've done this for the last few years, is it normally that high a percentage of our capital budget over five years that we don't know where we're going to get our money from? It seemed awful high. I don't remember it being this high, but I don't have a great memory. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: And then to add to that, Paul, the worst thing, as you and I know from our engineering background, is deferred maintenance. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Yes. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: You just keep on pushing it. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Very scary. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: And you keep on pushing. And the more you push -- COMMISSIONER SHEA: Huge capital expense. 5.A.a Packet Pg. 48 Attachment: 11-02-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27279 : November 2, 2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes) November 2, 2023 Page 45 of 48 COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: -- the worse it gets, yes. CHAIRMAN FRYER: County Manager, did you want to say a word? MR. BOSI: What I just put on the screen, Ms. Eastley put together a comparison of the '21, '22, and '23 AUIR in relationship to the overall expenditure in relationship to the unfunded needs. And they really sit within transportation and stormwater, for the most part. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yeah. MR. BOSI: And if you look at the percentage of that unfunded needs to overall expenditures, it's maybe a little bit percentage higher but not a tremendous deviation from what we had before. I think we traditionally have, with both of those areas, trouble within the Years 4 and 5, the out-years of identifying those revenue sources. So it's not a huge departure from where we were the prior year or for 2021 in that matter, but it's just a consistent -- we're always trying to struggle to find the necessary funds for the entire five-year program. It's the Years 1 through 3 that we're confident that we have the identified funds to be able to tell -- at least have those projects, you know, move to completion. COMMISSIONER SHEA: That's pretty -- I don't know if I agree with your assessment. I think the percentage is a lot bigger when you do them with the numbers. But I think we should make a statement, because it worries me how much of it -- I think the percentage of unfunded is growing, and it's a bigger challenge. And I realize a lot of it is in the next two or three years, but we're looking out five years, and that number, to me -- and I think if you do the percentages, it's a lot more growth than you think of the unfunded versus the total expenditure. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Commissioner Sparrazza. COMMISSIONER SPARRAZZA: Thank you, sir. CHAIRMAN FRYER: I'm sorry, County Manager, did you want to speak first? MS. PATTERSON: If I may just for a moment. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Of course. MS. PATTERSON: I don't disagree with you, and I think you have two things going on here. One is that we have experienced over the last couple of years these absolutely astronomical increases in cost. So that is a factor here because, obviously, we want this document to represent -- we don't have a crystal ball, but we want to represent the truest picture we have right now. So a project that cost $5 million a few years ago may cost 7 or $10 million now. It's just the reality of our situation. But the second thing is is we made a commitment to the Board of County Commissioners that we would show them the full picture of what's going on and not to scare anybody but, really, so that they can make good decisions on how we fund things and what our priorities are and so showing the magnitude of these needs, reasonably. There are a lot more needs in stormwater, but there's no point in showing a work plan that can never be accomplished. So this is an attempt to balance and have some reasonableness to the needs as well as what's a reasonable program and then, therefore, the shortfall. So, you know, we had years where we were only producing a balanced AUIR. And if that meant that there was $5 million in stormwater, there's $5 million in stormwater. That was always showed. There were years that we were mandated to have a financially feasible AUIR, and that's all you would show was a program that would balance with the revenue, and that started to change, and now we're really trying to show the Board the magnitude of the need, particularly as, you know, two things happen. As we grow and -- unique to stormwater probably than any other category in here is -- other than utilities is as we age. So as that aging infrastructure continues to head towards the end of its useful life or surpass it, we have a lot of needs out there for the community. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Commissioner Sparrazza. COMMISSIONER SPARRAZZA: Thank you, sir. Going along with what you started, I believe most of the Board here is on that same topic of what do we say or ask or put in our recommendation to the Board? Could we be as bold to ask or suggest that the Board, in nine months, whatever time frame is appropriate, has a first draft of a plan for a five-year program to increase those revenues and not to just allow them to say, yes, we have to work on it? 5.A.a Packet Pg. 49 Attachment: 11-02-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27279 : November 2, 2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes) November 2, 2023 Page 46 of 48 Unfortunately, it ends up being kicking the can down the road. Maybe they'll start on it next year. Is there a way we could reasonably ask them, can you put a timetable together on your first proposal or a draft or ideas? CHAIRMAN FRYER: That's a good point. I'm just -- I'm not sure politically whether -- COMMISSIONER SPARRAZZA: I recognize that. CHAIRMAN FRYER: -- whether that -- COMMISSIONER SPARRAZZA: I'm amongst friends here, so I can say that. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yeah. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I don't even know if that's within our -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yeah. Well, it may or may not be, and here's the County Manager. What do you recommend that we do? MS. PATTERSON: So back to our conversation about the stormwater utility, it may be something as simple as supporting the Board's exploration of -- exploration of viable options to fund some of these shortfalls that are outside of the traditional funding source, which is ad valorem and impact fees. COMMISSIONER SPARRAZZA: That sounds much more politically correct than what I was suggesting. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yeah. So we're recommending exploration and that, I think, is the -- COMMISSIONER SHEA: And expressing concern. MS. PATTERSON: The magnitude of the need is large, and we need viable options to sustainably fund these types of programs. COMMISSIONER SHEA: So if we don't need them, then somebody's into a big contest as prioritizing where you're going to spend the lesser amount of capital dollars, and we -- MS. PATTERSON: That was the -- COMMISSIONER SHEA: What we're looking at here could be a plan that never gets implemented because it's -- as Joe says, it's not funded. It's appropriated, but not -- approved but not appropriated. MS. PATTERSON: The Board's direction in our budget process was to turn over every rock and challenge everything that we have known about budgeting, which would include the capital program, to look at the budget going into FY '24. I would suggest that this is one of those things. We've assumed a certain way of doing things. And while it's changed a little bit, exploration of the traditional ways of funding capital improvements may need a refresh. And it may be that it comes back to say we still are comfortable with largely using gas tax, impact fees, and property taxes to fund the bulk of our capital program, or it may say we liked the use of the surtax, for example, which is sunsetting here in December, or we would like you to look at a stormwater utility again. Just exploring those things doesn't commit us to having to do them but simply says these are the options that you have at your disposal. COMMISSIONER SPARRAZZA: Is there an opportunity for us to, when we ask for the explanation -- exploration to begin to put a timetable on it? CHAIRMAN FRYER: That, I think, might be pushing it. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Yeah, that might be. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Timetables are for the Board to -- COMMISSIONER SHEA: We're volunteers. COMMISSIONER SPARRAZZA: Or ask -- no, ask them if they can come up -- I'm just afraid -- maybe I'm off -- I'm afraid that, yep, we're going to do that, and next year we'll start looking at -- and it just never happens, and before we know it, the five years are here. You need the money for the stormwater program, and all of a sudden we get a 30 percent increase in our taxes. That's all. I'll leave it at that. Thank you, Paul, for -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: Commissioner Schumacher. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: I was just going to call -- I was going to call for a motion -- 5.A.a Packet Pg. 50 Attachment: 11-02-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27279 : November 2, 2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes) November 2, 2023 Page 47 of 48 CHAIRMAN FRYER: Go right ahead. Make a motion. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: -- to approve with a note for the Board of Collier County Commissioners to explore viable options for funding of future projects that indicate shortfall. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Well said. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: Does that sound right? CHAIRMAN FRYER: It does to me. MS. PATTERSON: Absolutely. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Is there a second? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I second. Does that sound right to the County Manager? MS. PATTERSON: Yes, sir. And if you really wanted to put a time frame on it without a time frame, you most certainly would want to see this in advance of next year's AUIR because that number could be larger next year than it is this year. So, I mean, it does -- we're going to be doing this as part of the budget, so that should, I hope, provide you some assurance that this will be -- the capital program will be a focal point of the '24 budget, and the shortfalls will be explored at that time. CHAIRMAN FRYER: That sounds good. Further discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: It's been moved and seconded that we approve the AUIR and the CIE with the exploration suggestion also added to our motion, and county staff will write that in a diplomatic yet -- try to communicate the sense of urgency on our part. All those in favor of that motion, please say aye. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Aye. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Aye. COMMISSIONER SPARRAZZA: Aye. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: It passes -- Commissioner Klucik, are you on with us? COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Thank you. It passes unanimously. And -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Comment. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yeah, please go ahead. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I personally want to thank Amy for spending her morning with us. I know your time is valuable, and your input was tremendous today. So I really thank you for taking the time to talk to us poor souls up here. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yeah, I agree. Thank you so much, County Manager. MS. PATTERSON: Thank you. CHAIRMAN FRYER: All right. Now we'll go to old business, of which there is presumably none. That being the case, new business. Once again, I doubt there is any. Is there anyone in the room who would like to be heard on a matter that was not on our agenda today, please raise your hand. (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Seeing none, without objection, we're adjourned. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Thank you. COMMISSIONER SPARRAZZA: Thank you. 5.A.a Packet Pg. 51 Attachment: 11-02-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27279 : November 2, 2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes) November 2, 2023 Page 48 of 48 ******* There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair at 12:21 p.m. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION __________________________________________ EDWIN FRYER, CHAIRMAN These minutes approved by the Board on ____________, as presented __________ or as corrected _________. TRANSCRIPT PREPARED ON BEHALF OF FORT MYERS COURT REPORTING BY TERRI L. LEWIS, RPR, FPR-C, COURT REPORTER AND NOTARY PUBLIC. 5.A.a Packet Pg. 52 Attachment: 11-02-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27279 : November 2, 2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes) 12/07/2023 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Planning Commission Item Number: 5.B Doc ID: 27365 Item Summary: November 16, 2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes Meeting Date: 12/07/2023 Prepared by: Title: Operations Analyst – Planning Commission Name: Diane Lynch 11/29/2023 4:31 PM Submitted by: Title: Zoning Director – Zoning Name: Mike Bosi 11/29/2023 4:31 PM Approved By: Review: Growth Management Community Development Department Diane Lynch Department review Completed 11/29/2023 4:31 PM Zoning Mike Bosi Division Director Completed 11/29/2023 4:34 PM Growth Management Community Development Department James C French GMD Deputy Dept Head Completed 11/29/2023 4:36 PM Planning Commission Ray Bellows Meeting Pending 12/07/2023 3:00 PM 5.B Packet Pg. 53 November 16, 2023 Page 1 of 31 TRANSCRIPT OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Naples, Florida November 16, 2023 LET IT BE REMEMBERED that the Collier County Planning Commission, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 9:00 a.m., in REGULAR SESSION in Building "F" of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the following members present: Edwin Fryer, Chairman Robert L. Klucik, Jr. (attended remotely) Paul Shea Chuck Schumacher Christopher T. Vernon Amy Lockhart, Collier County School Board Representative ABSENT: Joe Schmitt, Vice Chair Randy Sparrazza ALSO PRESENT: Raymond V. Bellows, Zoning Manager Mike Bosi, Planning and Zoning Director Heidi Ashton-Cicko, Managing Assistant County Attorney 5.B.a Packet Pg. 54 Attachment: 11-16-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27365 : 11/16/2023 CCPC Meeting minutes) November 16, 2023 Page 2 of 31 P R O C E E D I N G S MR. BOSI: Chair, you have a live mic. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you, Mr. Bosi. Warm welcome to everyone on this 16th day of November 2023. This is the meeting of the Collier County Planning Commission. Glad you're here with us. Everybody please rise for the Pledge of Allegiance. (The Pledge of Allegiance was recited in unison.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Secretary, please call the roll. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Chair Fryer? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Here. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Vice Chair Schmitt, no. Secretary Shea is here. Commissioner Vernon? COMMISSIONER VERNON: Here. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Commissioner Klucik? COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Present. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Commissioner Sparrazza is not here. Commissioner Schumacher? COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: Here. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Ms. Lockhart? MS. LOCKHART: Here. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Did you hear me? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yes, we did, and I neglected to do what I always needed to before we call the roll, and that's just to get your request to participate electronically and give us a brief statement for cause. We'd appreciate that. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Yes. I'm traveling today to a family wedding, and so... CHAIRMAN FRYER: Granted, without objection, Planning Commission. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Which is -- I'm not going to be able to be there -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: That's fine. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: -- in person, but I can -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yeah. COMMISSIONER VERNON: Second. Have fun. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Well, thank you for calling in. We appreciate that. All right. All absences have been excused. Addenda to the agenda; we have two requests for continuance. And I'm going to ask Mr. Bellows to go over this, but first I want to remind the Planning Commission what the standards are. Because these are not automatic, and sometimes when I see emails come in where, in this case -- and I'm not going to mention any names -- but one of the applicants -- one of the applicants, one of that applicant's agents, texted me to say that -- no need for a meeting because that item will be continued, and, of course, that's our decision to make. And there is a pretty clear standard in here. And I'm not making any judgments about whether the two matters in question today rise to the standard or not. That's for us to talk about. But I just want to be sure everybody understands, you know, the role that we play. And this follows Planning 5.B.a Packet Pg. 55 Attachment: 11-16-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27365 : 11/16/2023 CCPC Meeting minutes) November 16, 2023 Page 3 of 31 Commission Resolution 2023-1 which was promulgated by us under authority of the Planning Commission organizational ordinance which authorizes us to adopt not only bylaws but rules of procedure as long as they're not in conflict with any other law. And so here's -- I'm going to just quote some excerpts out of this. And, again, I'm not trying to lean anybody to one thing or another. I just want everybody to know what the standard is of consideration on our part. It says, the Planning Commission expects that every item that has been advertised and public notification has been given shall only occur when both staff and the applicant are prepared to have the application heard by the Planning Commission. Should either the applicant or staff wish to continue the item, they may do so by requesting a continuance. The request for a continuance shall be in writing and shall state all the facts the requester contends justify a continuance. And the Planning Commission may grant a request for continuance if and only if good cause is shown. And good cause includes, but is not limited to the following: Number one, unavailability of a party, counsel, or material witness due to death, illness, or other extenuating circumstance; two, when the denial of a continuance creates a material and unavoidable hardship for the requesting party; and, three, where the cause of the request was unforeseeable and not the result of dilatory conduct. And that last one is pretty broad. Then it goes on to say, if the Planning Commission determines by majority vote that good cause for a continuation has been shown, then the item will be continued to a date no earlier than six weeks. Now, we could, by majority vote, set something earlier, but we're in a situation here -- and I'll say more about that after Mr. Bellows announces these requests -- we're jammed up at the Planning Commission for December and January, and so any request would -- if granted, would have to go no earlier than February 1st. And I just want to be sure that the applicants understand that, you know, we could hear them today, but if they continue to request a continuance, which, of course, they have a right to request, it's going to be moved all the way to February 1st at the earliest, probably February 1st, but we can't make any guarantees at this time. So that's the background that I wanted to present. And with that, Mr. Bellows. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Can I ask a question. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Please go ahead. COMMISSIONER SHEA: I guess process-wise I don't understand. That means they submit a request, but they all have to come to the meeting prepared to talk because they don't know if it's granted until we meet. Isn't there a better way to do this? CHAIRMAN FRYER: There might be. This is the resolution we have in front of us, and we can always change it, although it gets very complicated when we can't talk to each other. It gets next to impossible. I suppose there's a way that staff could manage it, and we could consider doing that. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Well, right now, what if we vote that we want to not approve the contingencies [sic]; they're not here to discuss it because they made an application that can't be approved until we say. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Well -- okay. Well, let me -- let me just pre -- let me preview my take on this. I've talked to both applicants, and in my personal view, they have -- they're able to show good cause. So I'm not worried about this particular one. But I wanted to be sure that they recognize that they're on the docket for today, and we 5.B.a Packet Pg. 56 Attachment: 11-16-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27365 : 11/16/2023 CCPC Meeting minutes) November 16, 2023 Page 4 of 31 could hear them today, but if we do find good cause, it's going to -- it's going to not be in December or January pursuant to our resolution. And I just want to be sure that when the applicants come up, they have a full and complete understanding that that's the situation we find ourselves in, because we've got a lot of very -- numerous and consequential rezone hearings coming before us in December and January. So with that, turn it back over to Mr. Bellows to announce the first -- the first request we received. MR. BELLOWS: Good morning. The first item is actually a companion item. It's 9A1 and 9A2. 9A1 is PL20220003804. It's the GMP amendment for JLM Living East Residential Overlay, and that companion item is PL2022 -- thank you -- 0003805, and that's the PUD for that JLM. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Mr. Yovanovich, did you want to tell us -- MR. YOVANOVICH: Do you want me to -- sure. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Just give us some cause. MR. YOVANOVICH: Sure. Well, briefly, two reasons: One, I did anticipate that we would be discussing the 30 percent set-aside. I was prepared for that. I wasn't prepared for the actual request to reduce the density 6.4 units per acre, but I could have addressed that. But most importantly -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: You mean 9.4, I think. MR. YOVANOVICH: Well, they wanted to go down to a much lower density at a 25 percent set-aside. There were two options. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Gotcha. Okay. MR. YOVANOVICH: I wasn't prepared for that one. I was prepared for the other. But, more importantly, it was discovered that we -- our PUD, we were asked to have a 60 percent open-space requirement, which was fine. We originally had in our GMP amendment the ability to reduce it to 50 percent, just like all other affordable housing applications, if they went through typical 2.06 process in the LDC. Somehow -- and we can't all figure out how that original 50 percent came out of the document, the GMP amendment. So if you went forward today and approved the PUD and the GMP, the PUD would be inconsistent with the Growth Management Plan because the Growth Management Plan requires a 70 percent set-aside. So instead of doing all of this on the fly, we would prefer to continue this, make sure all the right documents are in front of you. We've already told staff we are going to agree to the increase to 30 percent. So we didn't want to do all that on the fly. We wanted to have the complete documents in front of you, in front of the public, and that's the basis for our request, because we really can't go forward because of the Growth Management Plan text not being accurate. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. I -- as I mentioned, I'm inclined to grant the request, but you've had these materials since last Friday and -- MR. YOVANOVICH: I called Mike on Thursday when we first got them. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yeah. MR. YOVANOVICH: I told him we were going to ask for the request. The county was closed on Friday. 5.B.a Packet Pg. 57 Attachment: 11-16-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27365 : 11/16/2023 CCPC Meeting minutes) November 16, 2023 Page 5 of 31 CHAIRMAN FRYER: No, I understand. MR. YOVANOVICH: So as soon as we knew it, we got ahold of staff. CHAIRMAN FRYER: There's some scrivening that's needed, and it seems to me that you had enough time to do the scrivening so that we could have gone ahead today or, if not, we could have had a hearing today, and if we approved the PUD and the GMP with the concept of language, we could have then brought it back on consent. MR. YOVANOVICH: Well, the problem is the ordinance that was advertised to the public didn't have the complete GMP text. CHAIRMAN FRYER: And that's -- MR. YOVANOVICH: That's what I was concerned about. CHAIRMAN FRYER: That -- I was going to -- I was about to say that. And that's what tilted it for me. So I want to hear from staff before we deliberate up here. MR. BOSI: Mike Bosi, Planning and Zoning director. I mean, that was accurate. I did have the conversation with Mr. Yovanovich on -- late Thursday. We did receive it on Friday. We were closed. It was forwarded to the Planning Commission from -- and from that perspective, staff does appreciate the ability to have the time to get all the documents correct as agreed to, and then -- so what you'll be hearing when you hear this item, whenever that date would be, you know, it's going to be what's contained within the ordinance, within the GMP and within the PUD. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Any members of the public here who came in order to speak on this matter, please raise your hand. There's one. All right -- two, three. Okay. What we're going to do is we're going to give the public speakers an opportunity to speak now if they wish or to come back on the day that this is rescheduled to but not both. If you want to speak, you can take your choice. My recommendation is is that if you can come back, you do so, because it would be more fresh in our minds what your comments were. But we'll find out about that after we have a discussion up here. And so I'll open it up for discussion. And first to Commissioner Vernon. COMMISSIONER VERNON: Yeah. I just want to give a historical perspective. In my recollection of how this rule came about is because we became frustrated. We were reading hundreds of pages. Members of the public were showing up. And I think it came to a head. I don't think it was Rich; it was another land-use attorney kind of gave a last-minute request for continuance and then didn't show up just assuming it was going to be continued, which is fair on their part because there was no rule. So I think that Paul's pointed out, the rules probably need some adjustment, and that's fairly typical. You know, you make a rule, and then you see, well, it's not quite working, so we probably need to adjust the rule. But my recollection is I'm the one who pushed for a rule because, you know, if we're in a courtroom and there's rules, then everybody knows what to follow. And the problem was we just didn't have much consistency. We'd kind of gripe about it and then let it happen. And I think the rule is big progress. I did sort of -- in my mind, I noted that we -- I got an email a few days before. Candidly, I didn't get a chance to look at it because I was working. But I said, wow, the rule's kind of working, you know. It's -- so I feel like we're making progress. I think we need to make a little more progress. And the land-use community is so small that everybody who works in this county should be aware of it. You know, folks who -- like Rich, as long as they know 5.B.a Packet Pg. 58 Attachment: 11-16-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27365 : 11/16/2023 CCPC Meeting minutes) November 16, 2023 Page 6 of 31 what the rule is, I think they can comply with it. And, frankly, if you're coming in from out of town, it's your duty to learn the rules. And if you don't know them, that's your problem. And I think once we get the rule kind of just the way we want it, we just enforce it. And we always have the discretion to change our minds, but I don't think we should feel bad about enforcing the rules once it's settled on what it is and once, you know, people get used to it. So that's my thought. I don't have any problem with continuing it today, although it bothers me that members of the public showed up. That's -- and that's one thing that frustrated us. It wasn't fair for them to take off work and then have to come back. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Well, if we do continue this, it will be my recommendation that we allow the members of the public to speak either today or when this is rescheduled, but not both times. And if they do want to speak today, we could ask that the transcript of their comments be included in the staff report when it comes to us next time, presumably in February. We can talk about all of that. All right. Commissioner Shea. COMMISSIONER SHEA: I don't have a problem, but I'm going to -- with Rich's proposal. I do have a process problem, the same one that Chris is talking about. And it's not going to go away, and I don't know if there's a legal -- I mean, it just makes absolutely no sense that we can't -- everybody has to show up in anticipation of maybe we will or maybe we won't continue it. Process-wise, it makes no sense. We should have some way of knowing or allowing a granting of a continuance ahead of time; otherwise, you kind of defeat the whole purpose, and you create more chaos than if we just proceeded with it sometimes. To me, it's not a good process that everybody has to show up and wait for this group to decide when probably most of the time it wouldn't come to us unless it probably met the criteria. I mean, Mr. Bosi wouldn't put it forward as a request if he didn't think it met our criteria but, yet, still they don't have a definite yes or no until they come here. And I think -- I don't know what we can do about it, but it makes no process sense to me at all. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Well, I have a suggestion, but I'm going to hold onto it until we act upon this request. Commissioner Vernon. COMMISSIONER VERNON: Yeah. And I don't know whether we want to or need to solve it today. I definitely would like to have it on the agenda if we don't solve it today. But just brainstorming, I don't know that this can be delegated to the staff and -- or delegated to the staff and the Chair to make the decision so that you don't have really expensive experts and lawyers showing up just to say, hey, I wrote you about the continuance. Can we have the continuance? I don't know that that's legal, but, if so -- you know, and I would say that the -- I don't know how you deal with the discretion, but once we get the rule settled on, the default should be that it's denied unless there really is good cause or it's due to a mistake by the county as opposed to the applicant. I don't know -- I don't know whether that's even legal, but that may solve Paul's problem. MS. ASHTON-CICKO: Yeah. I mean, staff's going to administer this however you'd like it to be administered. I can tell you that Mr. Yovanovich did give me a call, I 5.B.a Packet Pg. 59 Attachment: 11-16-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27365 : 11/16/2023 CCPC Meeting minutes) November 16, 2023 Page 7 of 31 think it was last week, about the omission of the text regarding the open space in the GMP, and he told me that he was going to request a continuance. And I forgot about the issue being the omission, Mr. Fryer, when we spoke yesterday. So I agreed with Rich that I thought that was the best way for the record to be clear. COMMISSIONER VERNON: And it sounds like that is -- the rule is working the way it's supposed to with respect to this particular applicant. And the only problem that Paul raised is, well, the applicant still doesn't know, and they have to show up; the public has to show up. How do we fix that? COMMISSIONER SHEA: We have to show up. COMMISSIONER VERNON: And the closest thing I can think is to delegate it to the staff to make that decision. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yes, it happens -- COMMISSIONER SHEA: Exactly. CHAIRMAN FRYER: -- that was -- that was what I was going to propose. COMMISSIONER VERNON: Oh, okay. CHAIRMAN FRYER: But let's -- in fairness to this applicant, let's act on this request and perhaps take up the potential amendment of our resolution under new business if we want to talk more about it today. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Sounds good. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Does that make sense? Okay. That's what we'll do. All right. Any further discussion on the request for continuance? COMMISSIONER SHEA: This is for 9A1 and 9A2? CHAIRMAN FRYER: 9A1 and 9A2, yeah. And, again, let me clarify with staff so that I haven't -- I'm not making a mistake. Am I correct that the first convenient date that's not jammed up is February 1? MR. BOSI: Mike Bosi, Planning and Zoning director, again. On the 4th of January, we have the three Fiddler Creek petitions. We anticipate that to be a pretty demanding day. CHAIRMAN FRYER: No doubt. MR. BOSI: And then we have -- on the 18th we have five individual petitions. We have -- right now we have -- we have zero petitions on the 20 -- or February 1st. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Now -- all right. So unless there are further questions or comments, I'm going to go ahead and make a motion, if I may, and that is to grant the continuance to February -- well, first to establish a finding of good cause as required under the resolution and, based upon that finding, to grant a continuance of both of these matters, the GMP and the PUD, to February 1. Is that -- would that be satisfactory, Mr. Yovanovich, to your client? MR. YOVANOVICH: I'm going to -- the answer is -- can I ask you to just say to the next available date, which currently now is February 1st? During my discussions with Mr. Bosi about this continuance, he enlightened me about some comments that are coming my way on the Fiddler's Creek matter, which I haven't discussed with my client yet, and I would hate to end up continuing that while we're still talking, and then all of a sudden that date became an available date for the hearing. So that's my only -- I'll do whatever you request. I just wanted to kind of give you a heads-up. It may be a sooner date based upon what Mike just said as far as 5.B.a Packet Pg. 60 Attachment: 11-16-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27365 : 11/16/2023 CCPC Meeting minutes) November 16, 2023 Page 8 of 31 scheduled hearings. CHAIRMAN FRYER: We're not trying to preclude that if that makes the most sense for everybody, but at the present time it doesn't look like it's going to. But, certainly, if it turns out that it is and you can get the advertising out -- Mr. Bosi. MR. BOSI: I was going to say, we have until -- for the -- the 4th, the advertising deadline is today. MR. YOVANOVICH: For the 4th? CHAIRMAN FRYER: For February? MR. YOVANOVICH: For January? MR. BOSI: Oh, I'm sorry. It's December. I'm sorry. It's December 5th is the advertising deadline. So we've got two weeks -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: Well, as long as there's an understanding and an acceptance on the part of the applicant that the probability is this is going to go on February 1st unless all other factors align in a way that makes it convenient for all concerned. MR. YOVANOVICH: We understand that it may -- it may not happen until February 1st. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yeah. And, in fact, it may not happen February 1st. Probably will. MR. YOVANOVICH: If you guys take the day off. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Well, I mean, what if we don't get a quorum? MR. YOVANOVICH: I know. I understand. CHAIRMAN FRYER: It may not; it probably will. That's as much as I can say. All right. Any other comments before we vote? I made a motion. Is there a second? COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: Second. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Any further discussion? COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Mr. Chairman? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yes. Go ahead, Commissioner Klucik. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Yes. I would just like to say I realize, you know, the problem that's posed, and I realize there's probably not a great solution, but I just want to make note that, you know, ultimately, it's the residents or citizens in the community that have a stake, that are neighbors or -- somehow will be affected. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Well, your point -- COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: -- (unintelligible) by whatever petition is requesting the continuance. They're the ones -- they're the ones that are harmed regardless of how we proceed, because if we're reasonable -- I mean, the reason we wanted everybody to show up, in case we say no, is to make sure, you know, that we're in charge as a commission and that we get to actually have a meaningful decision -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: Exactly. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: -- and whether to grant the continuance. Ultimately, this system is -- you know, it just -- it's not -- I think we need to make sure that we're just as lenient to -- you know, to the people in community who want, you know, to participate in the hearings. And I don't know as, you know, there's a way to improve that, but it seems like they're the ones getting the shaft. And, obviously, I think it rubs us all the wrong -- 5.B.a Packet Pg. 61 Attachment: 11-16-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27365 : 11/16/2023 CCPC Meeting minutes) November 16, 2023 Page 9 of 31 CHAIRMAN FRYER: Commissioner, unfortunately, you're cutting out. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: And I just want to emphasize that. You know what, I'll switch -- that's fine. I'll switch to a different audio. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Thank you. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Don't worry about it for this. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Thank you very much. I think I need to amend my own motion or request an amendment of my own motion to include that we give the members of the public who are here to speak on this their choice of either speaking on it today or speaking on it when this matter is resumed. May I have a second to my proposal to amend my own motion? COMMISSIONER SHEA: Second. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Further discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. All those in favor -- now, this is just of amending the motion -- please say aye. COMMISSIONER VERNON: Aye. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Aye. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: Aye. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: (No verbal response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: All right. It's been amended. And again, Mr. Yovanovich, I take it you don't object to what we're doing so far? MR. YOVANOVICH: Right. If it's -- if it's the possibility of it being sooner than February 1st, that would be great. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yeah, understood. Okay. So now a vote on the main motion, which is to continue with the other caveats that I put in. All those in favor, please say aye. COMMISSIONER VERNON: Aye. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Aye. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: Aye. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: (No verbal response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: The matter's been continued. Thank you, applicant. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Aye, aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Very important thing; I didn't ask. The members of the public, who would -- who would like to -- who would like to speak today? We have one person -- two. Oh, yeah. Two people would like to speak today. All right. Well, this was clumsy on my part, and I apologize to all. Without objection from the applicant, without objection from the Planning Commission, we will -- well, I guess that the continuance can still stand because we've provided for hearing the people who want to be heard today, so that's what we'll do. All right. So have the two of you registered? All right. You probably haven't 5.B.a Packet Pg. 62 Attachment: 11-16-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27365 : 11/16/2023 CCPC Meeting minutes) November 16, 2023 Page 10 of 31 been sworn in yet. So let's ask you to rise and be sworn in by the court reporter. THE COURT REPORTER: Do you swear or affirm the testimony you will give will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth? (The speakers were duly sworn and indicated in the affirmative.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Disclosures starting with Ms. Lockhart, please. MS. LOCKHART: Text materials only. COMMISSIONER VERNON: No disclosures. COMMISSIONER SHEA: No disclosures. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. I have had conversations with applicant's representatives and with the staff and matters of public record. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: Text materials and email correspondence with residents surrounding the property. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. All right. So the way this is going to -- I'm sorry, Court Reporter. THE COURT REPORTER: Robb? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Oh, yeah, thank you. Commissioner Klucik, disclosures, please, sir. (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: We'll catch him when he comes back. All right. So I think the way this is going to go down in history, or should, is that we will begin hearing this today, but no one -- no one from the applicant's side or the staff are required to present any part of their case. If they want to reply to something that a member of the public says, I think they can, but they're not -- they don't have to put all their cards on the table today. When this comes back, they can start afresh, and if we have three speakers today, we'll probably be attaching the transcript of their comments to the staff report so everybody has it. All right. Who's the first registered speaker, please? MR. SABO: Mr. Chairman, these two speakers are State Road 846. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. So they're -- all right. Well, we haven't called that one yet. I thought I was clear. Maybe I wasn't. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Mr. Chairman? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yes, sir. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: I'm back with -- is this audio better? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yes, much, so far. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Okay. And I have no disclosures. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Thank you. Anyone here wanting to speak on JLM, please raise your hand. MR. SABO: Mr. Chairman, we have one Zoom speaker. We're going to try to contact them. UNIDENTIFIED SPEAKER: That's me, and I'll defer to the 1st. CHAIRMAN FRYER: You'll defer to the 1st? UNIDENTIFIED SPEAKER: Yes. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. So we're not going to have any public speakers today on JLM. That matter's been continued, and we will call the next matter. MR. BELLOWS: ***Okay. The next item for continuance is 9A4, which is PL20220006213. It's the SR846 Land Trust Earth Mine. 5.B.a Packet Pg. 63 Attachment: 11-16-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27365 : 11/16/2023 CCPC Meeting minutes) November 16, 2023 Page 11 of 31 COMMISSIONER VERNON: Mr. Chairman? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yes, Commissioner Vernon. COMMISSIONER SHEA: If I could bring up one procedural matter. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Please. COMMISSIONER VERNON: I usually turn off my phone before we start, and then I can't check my calendar. And I purposely left it on so that we could chat about the next meeting and availability. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. COMMISSIONER VERNON: So do you want to do that before I turn off my phone so we see if we have a quorum? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Sure, yeah. Our next -- let me get back to my cheat sheet here. COMMISSIONER VERNON: You don't need to. I just -- I know you usually do it, so... CHAIRMAN FRYER: No, thank you. Okay. So this -- our next meeting is going to be on December 7; is that correct? Yeah, December 7th, Pearl Harbor Day. Anyone know -- COMMISSIONER SHEA: That's a double meeting, isn't it, a 3 and a 5? MR. BOSI: Correct. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yes. Does anyone know if he or she cannot be at that meeting? COMMISSIONER SHEA: I've already put in a request. I'm not going to be here. I'll be out of town. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. COMMISSIONER VERNON: It's -- there's a 5 o'clock, second meeting? COMMISSIONER SHEA: There's a 3 -- well, on my notes it's to start at 3 and then 5 for the after-5 content. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yeah, we've got an evening meeting. COMMISSIONER VERNON: Yeah, I don't know whether I can make it. CHAIRMAN FRYER: You can be an "I don't know" for now. COMMISSIONER VERNON: I don't know. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Anybody else? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Commissioner Klucik, you okay on that date, December 7? COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Yes. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Good. And then just for your calendars, our December 21, 2023, meeting has been canceled, so that will take us into January, and we'll poll on that on December 7. All right. So back to Mr. Bellows. MR. BELLOWS: That was Agenda Item 9A4. I read the petition number. Do you want the full title? CHAIRMAN FRYER: No. No, that's fine. I'm not going to give the same introduction, because it applies exactly, unless the Planning Commission wants to hear it again. But I think -- I think we're all primed now to know what we need to do, and so I'll ask -- it's Mr. Arnold or another representative who's going to come up and make the case 5.B.a Packet Pg. 64 Attachment: 11-16-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27365 : 11/16/2023 CCPC Meeting minutes) November 16, 2023 Page 12 of 31 of good cause. MR. ARNOLD: Thank you. Good morning. Wayne Arnold here, for the record, with Grady Minor & Associates. So we had -- we represent the applicant for the 846 mine. Staff is recommending approval; however, on Monday of this week we received an email from your Transportation Planning staff asking us to agree to a new commitment to show a road reservation across this property. And we've had some dialogue back and forth with Mr. Sawyer and Ms. Lantz regarding that project. And then, in fact, last night we received another request to modify and add additional language. And in conferring with Mr. Yovanovich, our counsel, and our client, they're not comfortable agreeing to that until we can sit down and talk to staff regarding this new request. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Thank you. MR. ARNOLD: Yes, sir. CHAIRMAN FRYER: And you heard -- you were here, of course, when the other applicant was at the dais. And I just want to be sure that your client understands that he could have gone forward today. I understand your reason, and we'll talk about good cause in a moment. But yours is also probably going to go to February 1. MR. ARNOLD: We understand, yes, sir. CHAIRMAN FRYER: And I want to be sure that you understand and you agree to that. MR. ARNOLD: Yes, sir. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Thank you very much. All right. The subject -- Mr. Bosi. MR. BOSI: Yeah, I did want to -- Mike Bosi, Planning and Zoning director. I wanted to put on the record for the 9A1, 9A2, and 9A4, the ones that are requesting the continuance, whether they fall upon the January 4th meeting or whether it be the February 1st meeting, new public notices will have to be provided, and the items will have to be readvertised as well. So I just wanted to put that on the record. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yeah. And there are costs, as the applicants, I'm sure, know. I think it's $500. And also additional costs of advertising and related costs. Okay, thank you. So where does that take us? COMMISSIONER SHEA: We have to vote on that. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Oh, yeah, we do. Discussion of this request? Mr. Bosi. MR. BOSI: And just to remind the Chair, I do believe we had two individuals that did want to speak to this today if you do grant the continuance. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you very much for reminding. Any other -- any comments on good cause? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. I would -- I'm prepared to accept the explanation as good cause. Having said that now, we know that we do have two members of the public who are to be given the choice of either speaking now or waiting until the matter comes up again, presumably February 1st. Members of the public, if you want to speak today, please raise your hand. Okay. They both are raising their hands, and so we will hear from them. And I'll call the matter. 5.B.a Packet Pg. 65 Attachment: 11-16-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27365 : 11/16/2023 CCPC Meeting minutes) November 16, 2023 Page 13 of 31 And you do understand that you will not be invited to speak again a second time, so this is -- this will be it for you. And also applicant understands that we're not waiving. We don't -- we don't consider this to be a waiver of any part of your case; that you would start from the beginning. All right. So let me -- okay. This is PL20220006213. It is a PUDZ -- oh, no, it's a CUA, excuse me. And so we're going to ask that the witnesses first be sworn in. Please rise to be sworn in by the court reporter. THE COURT REPORTER: Do you swear or affirm the testimony you will give will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth? (The speakers were duly sworn and indicated in the affirmative.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Disclosures starting with Ms. Lockhart. MS. LOCKHART: Staff materials only. COMMISSIONER VERNON: No disclosures. COMMISSIONER SHEA: No disclosures. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Staff materials, matters of public record, meeting with staff, meeting -- or conversations with the applicant's agent. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: Staff materials, email with staff. That was it. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Commissioner Klucik? COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: No, nothing to disclose. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Good. I guess we did need to have a vote on the continuance subject to these speakers. So I'd entertain a motion to continue to the first available date, presumably April -- February 1st. Is there a -- COMMISSIONER SHEA: So moved. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Second? COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: Second. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Further discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: And, of course, it's subject to us hearing these two speakers today. All those in favor, please say aye. COMMISSIONER VERNON: Aye. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Aye. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: Aye. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. It passes unanimously. Call the speakers, please. MR. SABO: Mr. Chairman, we have two speakers in person. We have one online. Mr. Carlos Garcia and Robert Dixon. There's two podiums, if you could both walk up there, please, and then we'll get to the online speaker. CHAIRMAN FRYER: And we'll ask you first to state your name. Which one is going first? MR. DIXON: That will be me, sir. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Good. State your name, and then you've got three 5.B.a Packet Pg. 66 Attachment: 11-16-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27365 : 11/16/2023 CCPC Meeting minutes) November 16, 2023 Page 14 of 31 minutes. MR. DIXON: All right, sir. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Correction, five minutes. MR. DIXON: I appreciate it. Thank you. Robert Dixon. Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. So I prepared pretty much a statement, because I know we're on a time frame here. I usually like to just ad lib, but -- so we're talking about the land trust mine. The State of Florida's allowable blast limit peak particle velocity, which is abbreviated PPV -- and you'll see that in a bit -- as I've been told, is a value of 1. Collier County set their PPV limit at .5, which is half of what State of Florida allows. That's great. The recordings in the recent blasts, I have been told by the blasting company, the PPV has been well below even the allowable .5. COMMISSIONER VERNON: I'm so sorry to interrupt. I must be screwed up here. I thought we were talking about Union Road, the 109 units. CHAIRMAN FRYER: No. COMMISSIONER SHEA: No, no. This is the second continuance. CHAIRMAN FRYER: We're going to hear that in its entirety. COMMISSIONER VERNON: My apologies for interrupting. MR. DIXON: No, no problem. So at this point everything looks great on paper. Quality Enterprises is the company that's in charge of blasting, is following Collier County code, but the reality is that homeowners are experiencing structural damage to their homes specifically on the blast that took place on 9/14/23 at 1:02 p.m. So if the state gives allowable limit of 1, county adopted .5, they're blasting well below the Collier County adopted limit, everything looks great on paper, but the reality is is we are suffering damages to our houses. I've got over 12 to 15 cracks in my house from the September 14th blast. So moving on. Barry Blankenship, he's the representative for Quality insurance, came out on 9/29/23 to some of the homeowners' residences to evaluate the damage that was caused by the 9/14 blast. My house -- excuse me. My house alone sustained over a dozen cracks by itself. Barry Blankenship came out to my house. He acknowledged the damage and stated, future blasts, he's going to reconfigure the blast and use smaller amounts to prevent any further damage to our houses, which he did follow through with on the 9/29/23 blast and the most recent one as of yesterday, which made a big difference. QE blasted with less explosives and blasted from the direction south to north, first north to south, which was done on the 9/14/23 blast. So it's a long sequence of blasts that has to start in one direction, ends in another direction, and the 9/14 blast, they started from north, and they shot it south where all the houses are. Everything north, there's no houses. So that was probably a really big mistake on their part for the 9/14 blast. Barry stated not to fix any of the existing damage and see if it gets any worse after he continues to reconfigure the blast and the amount of explosives. Barry stated to my neighbor, Harold Hoosman (phonetic), which actually -- excuse me -- which is here, and I that once we establish that no more damage will be incurred from the future blasts, that he will arrange restitution on how the damage will be corrected. 5.B.a Packet Pg. 67 Attachment: 11-16-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27365 : 11/16/2023 CCPC Meeting minutes) November 16, 2023 Page 15 of 31 Barry also installed a seismic monitor on my neighbor's property, Harold's, next door to monitor future blasts. Barry was very sincere, and he seemed committed to do his best to prevent any further damage from taking place in the future, which was great news, and he has to date. But I want to emphasize that Barry also stated that he's doing this on a voluntary basis only and that QE is operating under Collier County code. Barry also stated that they incur a minimum charge per blast, meaning QE is paying for a minimum of 200 blast holes even if they only blast 100 holes. So the fear is although Barry's good faith seems to be sincere, you know, money talks; they are a business. The previous approved allowable .5 PPV limit is way too high, and the allowable limit needs to be significantly reduced and made to code. We are already experiencing damage to structures now, and we're not even close to the .5 PPV. We cannot and should not rely solely on blasting companies to just practice under a voluntary basis. What happens if they decide that it's no longer convenient or cost effective to work under a voluntary basis, or another company comes in or the representative no longer works for that company, and now we're starting all over again? If QE were to blast anywhere near the .5 PPV, it would destroy thousands of structures, making them unsafe and inhabitable, displacing thousands of Collier County residents. We are already facing a housing crisis here in Collier County, and this would be catastrophic. My closing comments is it's imperative that Collier County Commissioners and staff recognize the potential disaster of future blasts if these blast protocols are not reevaluated and allowed to go unchecked. So we ask to please help and protect us and put more stringent rules in place to prevent any further damage. You know, if they go to their .5 and they've, like, gone even less than half that at times -- I -- literally, I've already sent pictures in to Eric Ortman. He's seen everything. Barry's come out; he's acknowledged the damage. It's clearly from the blast. He said he's going to fix it, which is great. I'm hoping they're all superficial. He said he's going to keep moving in the right direction, which he's been doing. Yesterday's blast, it was regular rumble; no problem. The blast they did on 9/29, which he said he was going to reevaluate, was the regular rumble. But that 9/14 specific blast, our house felt like a pirate ship out on the open sea. I mean, it rocked like there was no tomorrow. CHAIRMAN FRYER: All right, sir. Thank you. Commissioner Shea has a question or comment. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Just -- sir, just to understand better, do they have the PP -- peak particle velocity measurement device near your house running continuously or just occasionally they do a test? MR. DIXON: Well, I'm not -- he set it up permanently. He never had one in our direction. It was always in every other direction but ours. COMMISSIONER SHEA: But is it by your house? MR. DIXON: It's literally on Harold's property. COMMISSIONER SHEA: So it's by your house, yeah. MR. DIXON: Now, he installed that -- COMMISSIONER SHEA: And he monitors continuously? MR. DIXON: As far as I know. I don't know exactly how it works, but it's there 5.B.a Packet Pg. 68 Attachment: 11-16-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27365 : 11/16/2023 CCPC Meeting minutes) November 16, 2023 Page 16 of 31 24/7 with a solar panel, and I'm assuming it's taking readings. And the big problem with the readings is is they're well under, but I don't know if we're on a fault line or if there's -- there's definitely something wrong, which it caused damage to the house without a doubt. And if it was to continue, it would make the structures unsound and inhabitable. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Thank you, sir. Next speaker. MR. GARCIA: Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. My name is Carlos Garcia. I'm here to reinforce everything Mr. Dixon just talked about. I've lived at this address for 21 years. Mr. Dixon owns two properties on the street, and I own five on the same street. I have gone through this entire scenario before the other neighbors have. They've actually set up a seismic monitor on my property for one blast, and I never heard a response back from the company. My house has difficulties opening windows because of the angle of the window. We have tenting on the tiles, on the floor tiles. We have significant cracks in the stucco and the CBS block. And I want to back up a little bit and give you a little bit of history on who I am and what I know. I'm 100 percent familiar with Dyno Nobel. Dyno Nobel provides the explosive emulsifier for these blasts when the holes are dug, okay. In my chosen career path as an explosive expert with the military, I understand how it works. I've actually done, to say, a field trip, per se, at Dyno Nobel with my profession. We've experienced exactly how they work and how everything happens. These companies are out here exploding or imploding land and dirt for a fee. Like Mr. Dixon said earlier, it's about money. Unfortunately, many of us have been there many years, and we're sustaining damage to our homes as well, okay. I don't think it's fair. I've already spoken, before we've even got to this far, with Mr. Dixon and the other neighbors where now the neighborhood is more inhabited. There's a lot more homes going up now, and there's a lot more people complaining. I'm not here to ask them to stop their operation. I'm not asking that. I understand they have to do business, but what's on paper makes no sense with what's actually happening on the ground. One thing is what you put on a piece of paper and feel that that's an allowable limit, and another thing is reality, what's really happening and what we're really experiencing and feeling. It's not normal for a house that's built with the South Florida building code to experience that kind of shaking and rattling. We're talking about significant movement and shifting. We're talking about damage to our homes. I actually had people come over -- from these companies come over and evaluate the damage. They took pictures of the tile. They saw it. They're aware of it. They know it. This is our second runaround. This is my second runaround with this -- this issue. I'm requesting -- I'm here to request that we examine or evaluate the amount of allowable limits and the direction of the blast. When they changed the direction of the blast, we had almost no recognition of what was going on. It didn't even -- we didn't even feel it. It wasn't bad. But the last blast that they did that Mr. Dixon was talking about, it violently shook our home, and that's not common of concrete and rebar. It shouldn't be happening. 5.B.a Packet Pg. 69 Attachment: 11-16-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27365 : 11/16/2023 CCPC Meeting minutes) November 16, 2023 Page 17 of 31 So we're not new to the neighborhood. We're not new people. We're, like I said, 21 years in this county. I understand how things work. We're here full time. We're full-time residents and voters in this county. I don't think it's right, and I'm here to reinforce everything that was being said here and just take -- you know, with a grain of salt, just understand that there are the way things are and the way things should be. One thing is what you see on paper, and it looks very good and scientific and perfect, but that's not the reality. Reality is in a whole 'nother ballpark. So if we can please, to reiterate what I just said earlier, I encourage you to go out there; take a look at it. I don't know if you guys get field time. Go out there and take a look and see what's going on. Go out there during the blast and see how high that rock flies out there. I mean, this is a big operation. And, you know, that's -- I just want you to be aware of it. Maybe you're not aware of what's going on. But it's our homes; it's our property. It's a lot of money of property. It's not just one house. It's several properties. Okay. Thank you for your time. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you, sir. Commissioner Shea. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Question, sir. MR. GARCIA: Yes. COMMISSIONER SHEA: I just wanted to make sure I understood. MR. GARCIA: Yes. COMMISSIONER SHEA: When they changed the direction, were they below the .5? MR. GARCIA: When they changed the direction -- COMMISSIONER SHEA: When they changed the direction of the blast away from the residence. MR. GARCIA: That's a great question. COMMISSIONER SHEA: They met the .5? MR. GARCIA: That's a great question. COMMISSIONER SHEA: You don't know? MR. GARCIA: Now, for me as a -- you're right. For me as a constituent, how would I know? I wouldn't -- I wouldn't know. And then there is no seismic machine on my property, and I'm at -- so it's important to note that I am at the very end of the property [sic]. Our house is at the very end of the street, the last property. So, you know, as a constituent, we don't know. We take their word for it, and then when we called the county and said, hey, you know, what's going on? They're blasting again. The gentleman that answers the phone is like, well, we didn't know nothing about this. So now it's just a big runaround, like a big circle. So it feels to us like they have a liaison, and we don't have anyone. So we're here because we're hoping that you can help us, because nobody else is. CHAIRMAN FRYER: All right, sir. Thank you very much. MR. GARCIA: Thank you. Have a good day. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Mr. Arnold, do you want to say anything, you or Mr. Yovanovich, at this time? You don't have to. MR. ARNOLD: No, sir. I think we're fine. The comments were understood, and as he indicated, we've had folks on site, and we're looking into the matter. 5.B.a Packet Pg. 70 Attachment: 11-16-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27365 : 11/16/2023 CCPC Meeting minutes) November 16, 2023 Page 18 of 31 CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Did you signal again? COMMISSIONER SHEA: Yes. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Go ahead, Commissioner Shea. COMMISSIONER SHEA: This is for Mike Bosi. When this comes up, I would like to have somebody from the county here that can talk to the questions that this gentleman had about measurements and county regulations. We really need to hear that at this level, what the process normally is. It's only a comment. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Commissioner Schumacher. MS. ASHTON-CICKO: I'll -- if I may, I'll address that for Mr. Bosi. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Go ahead. MS. ASHTON-CICKO: The Florida Fire Marshal has exclusive jurisdiction over the blasting activities. The county does, I believe, monitor it. I do not believe he has delegated the authority for the regulation and enforcement to the county, but I'll verify that before it comes back. COMMISSIONER SHEA: We have a different standard than the state, so how do we enforce ours if we -- MS. ASHTON-CICKO: I'm not sure what that's about because Section 552.30 does give that jurisdiction, and the county's preempted -- COMMISSIONER SHEA: I'd like -- MS. ASHTON-CICKO: -- unless it's been delegated. COMMISSIONER SHEA: -- something clear -- explained before we go through -- when we get to the next hearing, hopefully ahead of time, how the structure of the regulatory part of it works, and what do citizens do -- what is their recourse? Who do they call? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Mr. Bosi's nodding in the affirmative, so I assume that that will be in the staff materials when -- COMMISSIONER SHEA: Yeah. I don't need a discussion on it now, but I will ask it later. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Commissioner Schumacher. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: I'm sorry. I didn't follow that. Did you say it was the county fire marshal that has jurisdiction, or state? MS. ASHTON-CICKO: State. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: So the state fire marshal has that, because I believe the DEP is also involved when it comes to blasting permits. It requires time of day, weather conditions, so on and so forth, correct? MR. BOSI: I believe so. And we will have someone from the -- from our engineering department who will be able to answer these questions when we hold -- when we hear the matter. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: Because the limited research I did online with the DEP states that they have to make neighboring properties aware of what they're doing and when they're going to do it. So if somebody could be here to clarify that -- because I agree with Mr. Garcia that, you know, they need an advocate on the county's side. But if the county doesn't have jurisdiction and it goes through the state fire marshal, it's just layers upon layers of bureaucracy, and we need to figure out a way to clean this up. CHAIRMAN FRYER: True. Just as a reminder to ourselves, there are going to 5.B.a Packet Pg. 71 Attachment: 11-16-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27365 : 11/16/2023 CCPC Meeting minutes) November 16, 2023 Page 19 of 31 be 37, 38 conditions, somewhere in that range, where we're going to have proactive input into how the mining and blasting operations are conducted. So we'll -- that -- you know, we'll have some involvement there. Commissioner Vernon. COMMISSIONER VERNON: I think -- I'm not sure, you may have just answered my thought/question, Mr. Chairman. But I guess I'm just wondering -- I feel like I'm a little out of my element. I ask the staff/legal if the -- it sounds like -- it sounds like to me the applicant's trying to be a good neighbor. And so my nightmare scenario, thinking down the road, what if the good neighbor applicant sells the property, and the new owner feels very differently about being a good neighbor. So I'm just wondering if the applicant and the neighbors get together and sort of -- this is probably the wrong word -- codify or agree to what it sounds like the applicant's already willing to do, and that becomes part of the application, and then that's the -- that's the protocol, whether he sells it or not. So I'm sure I'm using a lot of the wrong language, but do you -- Mike and you guys, do you understand what I'm asking? MS. ASHTON-CICKO: Yes, but Mr. Perry, who worked on this petition, did advise me there is a condition about the vibration that occurs at the -- where is it. The ground -- yeah. The ground vibration shall be allowed up to a not to exceed a calendar monthly average of .20-inch per second. So that is a condition that currently exists. If they're not complying with that, then it could be a code enforcement issue if a complaint is filed. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Is that a county code issue, then? MS. ASHTON-CICKO: Yes, as to -- because that's a current condition in the conditional use. COMMISSIONER SHEA: You said .2 PPV? MS. ASHTON-CICKO: Yeah, .2. What did I say? COMMISSIONER SHEA: I'm getting confused with 1, .5, and .2. MS. ASHTON-CICKO: No, it wasn't PPV, sorry. What was it? I lost the page. MR. PERRY: It's how much the ground can shake, essentially, on a monthly average. I don't know -- there's -- COMMISSIONER SHEA: Well, it's measured as PPV, the particle. It's got to be -- MS. ASHTON-CICKO: I don't think so. CHAIRMAN FRYER: I'd like to suggest, if I may, that we -- that we defer further discussion on this because we haven't even heard the applicant's initial report and request. And it's good that they had the opportunity to hear what some of our concerns are, but let's not try to play out the whole thing on the merits yet. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Agreed. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yeah. Mr. Arnold. MR. ARNOLD: Mr. Chairman, I concur. When we have the full hearing, we'll have our blasting expert here, seismologist here, as well as the mine operator. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Thank you. Anything further from the Planning Commission on this? COMMISSIONER VERNON: Sorry to -- I just feel -- you know, I'm not opposed to enforcing our code. I just feel like -- that you've got an applicant trying to be a good 5.B.a Packet Pg. 72 Attachment: 11-16-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27365 : 11/16/2023 CCPC Meeting minutes) November 16, 2023 Page 20 of 31 neighbor on the practical side as opposed to a bunch of numbers, as Mr. Garcia said. And thank you for your service, sir. That I'd rather see something that the neighbors think is good and the applicant think is good rather than a bunch of numbers which are different than what's boots on the ground, what's going on. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. I think we've well signaled the concerns we have at this point, this very preliminary point, to both staff and the applicant, and we'll expect to hear back -- Mr. Perry, did you want to say something? MR. PERRY: There will be an opportunity when it comes back for a -- if the applicant and staff choose, to have an amended document. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yeah, okay. Good. All right. Then that matter stands continued. ***And it's 9:53. Let's see how well -- how quickly we can dispose of the first and only matter now on our calendar is PL20220004175. This is the 1,200 -- 12425 Union Road RPUDZ. All those wishing to testify in this matter, please rise to be sworn in by the court reporter. THE COURT REPORTER: Do you swear or affirm the testimony you will give will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth? (The speakers were duly sworn and indicated in the affirmative.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Disclosures starting with Ms. Lockhart, please. MS. LOCKHART: Staff materials only. COMMISSIONER VERNON: No disclosures. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Staff materials only. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Public materials, discussions with staff, and a conversation with applicant's agent. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: Staff materials only. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Commissioner Klucik? COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Nothing to disclose. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Thank you. With that, the Chair recognizes Ms. Passidomo. MS. PASSIDOMO: Thank you. Good morning, Planning Commission. Francesca Passidomo for the record. I'm just pulling up the presentation. Again, Francesca Passidomo, 4001 Tamiami Trail, on behalf of the applicant, who is here with me today, Lindsay J. Case. Sitting here with me is the owner of the property, and his limited liability company is the applicant for today's petition. Wayne Arnold is the planner for the project, also with me today; Rich Yovanovich, obviously, you all are very familiar with Rich, land-use attorney; Mike Delate from Grady Minor; and traffic -- I'm sorry. Jim Banks on behalf of the traffic planning. I'm sorry. I'm a little bit frazzled, so bear with me. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Well, while you're unfrazzling, let me slightly amend -- COMMISSIONER VERNON: I do it all the time, so... CHAIRMAN FRYER: Slightly amend my disclosure. I have -- I have been by this site many, many times, but not particularly recently, because I'm a customer of the gun club. Okay. Go ahead. MS. PASSIDOMO: Thank you for the amendment. 5.B.a Packet Pg. 73 Attachment: 11-16-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27365 : 11/16/2023 CCPC Meeting minutes) November 16, 2023 Page 21 of 31 That's the introduction. Thank you, Mr. Fryer. This property is located in Port of the Islands. It's approximately one mile north of U.S. 41. You can see the location here on your screen. To the north is the gun club, which is zoned conservation. To the west is also zoned conservation protected lands. To the south is a residential development known as Orchid Cove, and the project itself bisects a road known as Union Road, which is a road owned by Port of the Islands. It's an independent special district that operates utilities specific to this location of Collier County. And to the west is also conservation and a canal. The total project acreage is approximately 51 acres, again, bisected by Union Road. The future land-use designation is urban mixed-use, and the current zoning is RT residential. A small portion is also zoned conservation. Importantly, and as noted in the staff report, the project, as a matter of right today, allows for 16 dwelling units per acre in the RT zoned area, which equates to over 630 units of density. This represents, as you can see by the proposed PUD zoning, which is a downzone to single-family, approximately one-sixth of the acreage that's permitted as a matter of right. There's also a significant reduction in -- minimization, rather, in the development standards, as you can see, as height, increase in buffers and, from the perspective of the residents who we've been working with significantly through the course of this project, compatibility of use by eliminating uses like hotel and transient lodging to just single-family residential uses. This is a depiction of the master plan. Again, bisecting Union Road. There is one amenity tract within the project that's on the east side of Union Road. It's specifically designated on the master plan and would have typical amenity uses that would be complementary to the residential property; clubhouse, et cetera. The PUD, as typical through a PUD, designates us permitted uses as to each tract, the residential and amenity tract. The proposed development standards are typical for single-family and -- both attached and detached, as well as typical amenity area standards. The height for the amenity area is the same as the height for the residential. So, again, that's a significant reduction in zoned height. We provide here a few conceptual building elevations just to give you a sense of how the project would look. We don't have a -- obviously, a fully developed concept yet as to elevations, so this is conceptual. The only -- excuse me. The only deviation which has received staff report is for minimum roadway width within the project, and this is to -- this is very customary for residential projects, and it's to facilitate a more compact development. The deviation is from a 60 feet minimum width to 50 feet minimum width. In conclusion, the project has received a recommendation of staff approval. The traffic study and TIS -- sorry -- submitted with this application shows that the number of trips would be approximately 108. That is obviously a substantial reduction to what the number of trips would be under the current permitted zoning. In addition, the TIS demonstrated that the adjacent roadway links have sufficient capacity to support this project. That's a quick summary of our presentation, and I open it up to any questions you may have for me or any of the professionals. 5.B.a Packet Pg. 74 Attachment: 11-16-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27365 : 11/16/2023 CCPC Meeting minutes) November 16, 2023 Page 22 of 31 CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. No one is signaling quite yet. I've just got a couple of questions or comments. First of all, with respect to the TIS, there is an imperiled road segment, and that's 95.3 of the East Trail. It's at F with minus 113 capacity left. But since this is a downzoning, the result is is that there will be fewer automobiles and other motor vehicles on the roads than there would have under the current zoning, so... MS. PASSIDOMO: And I also believe that that -- that was based on a trip count that will be -- the staff report notes that's based on a trip count that will be more properly reflected in updates. So it's obviously a state road, so we'd be working with -- the county would be working with Florida Department of Transportation to make sure that that grading of that roadway segment is correctly reflected in the future. But, of course, this is a significant downzoning as well. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Then a question, and that is, how will notice be brought home to the purchasing residents that there is a gun club north of there? MS. PASSIDOMO: As a matter of fact, with the closing with the Port of the Islands development, we worked with the gun club to ensure their access was retained. So we actually granted the gun club a specific access easement through the property. And in conjunction with that access easement, we provided, at the gun club's request but also prudency for our own end-users to your point, we provide notice specific in the document. So it will be a matter of record that this project abuts a gun club to the north. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Is the plan that that notice will find its way into a deed? MS. PASSIDOMO: Well, it is a matter of title, so it's reflected in public record. When we're crafting the homeowners association documents, that's -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. MS. PASSIDOMO: -- some time from now, but perhaps we incorporate it. That would be -- that would be in our interest, too. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. So the HOA documents, which are filed for record, that's how it gets to be a matter of public record? MS. PASSIDOMO: Well, it already at this time is. But if you're asking whether it would be incorporated into some other future documents -- so it's already a matter of record at this point in time. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yeah. That's all I need to know. Thank you. Commissioner Vernon. COMMISSIONER VERNON: Aren't there two gun clubs there? MS. PASSIDOMO: There's a gun club to the north, excuse me, and that is all I'm personally aware of. So just right there north of the yellow line, that's the gun club which I believe Mr. Fryer was speaking to. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yeah. I can elaborate a little bit. I'm not sure whether there are two ownerships, but there is a clay pigeon shotgun course with, you know, a high house and a low house, and then there's a long-distance rifle and the short distance pistol course a little farther north. COMMISSIONER VERNON: In the back? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yeah, farther north of the -- COMMISSIONER VERNON: Are those common ownership? CHAIRMAN FRYER: I don't know. MS. PASSIDOMO: We only worked with one owner of the gun club in the access 5.B.a Packet Pg. 75 Attachment: 11-16-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27365 : 11/16/2023 CCPC Meeting minutes) November 16, 2023 Page 23 of 31 easement, so my presumption would be there's a single entity owner. COMMISSIONER VERNON: Okay. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Any other questions or comments? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Is that all you have right now? MS. PASSIDOMO: It is, and I apologize for the start, but I appreciate your patience. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Oh, you recovered nicely. COMMISSIONER VERNON: You did great. Anybody objecting to this? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Well, we'll find out. MS. PASSIDOMO: Not in the -- not based on the record in front of you -- COMMISSIONER VERNON: So you're not aware of -- MS. PASSIDOMO: -- or in the correspondence. COMMISSIONER VERNON: You're not aware of any? MS. PASSIDOMO: I personally can speak to that we've worked extensively with the district through this process. So it would be my expectation that we're all holding hands at this point. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Well, since Commissioner Vernon's asking the question, let me take the initiative to ask, if there's anyone in the audience who wishes to be heard in this matter as a member of the public, please raise your hand. (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Seeing no hands, I think that's -- COMMISSIONER SHEA: Staff. MR. SABO: Mr. Chairman. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yeah, go ahead, Commissioner [sic]. MR. SABO: We have a speaker on Zoom. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Oh, okay. So we're going to hear from somebody. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Don't we hear from Mike first? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Oh, yeah, yeah. But I just was -- he asked, you know, whether there would be public comment, and so I wanted to get an answer to him. But we're -- yeah, we're ready to go. Assuming the applicant's finished, we'll now turn to staff and have staff's report. Go ahead, sir. MR. BOSI: Mike Bosi, Planning and Zoning director. As indicated within the staff report, from our analysis of the Growth Management Plan and the Land Development Code and the Concurrency Management System, staff is recommending approval. I do believe that we have received one comment not of support of the proposal. The person who provided it lives on the south side of Port of the Islands, and they indicated that they moved there for its rural character and low density, and they wanted to keep it that way. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Thank you. Commissioner Shea. COMMISSIONER SHEA: More of an educational question. I probably should know the answer, but it seems like everything around it is zoned conservation. What does that mean? 5.B.a Packet Pg. 76 Attachment: 11-16-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27365 : 11/16/2023 CCPC Meeting minutes) November 16, 2023 Page 24 of 31 MR. BOSI: It means there is no development scheduled or permitted within that area. COMMISSIONER SHEA: So why -- why was this approved in the middle of a conservation area? This is a historical thing. I'm not -- it has nothing to do with the application, so... MR. BOSI: This is a settlement that dates back well before my time with the county back, I believe, to the '80s. The future land-use designation carves out this area that's being rezoned as urban residential. All the rest is conservation. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Okay. MR. BOSI: It's an exception. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Anything further from staff? MR. BOSI: Nothing from staff. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. We have -- oh, Commissioner Vernon. COMMISSIONER VERNON: Yeah. What -- the old burned-out hotel, the county owns that? MR. BOSI: Yes. COMMISSIONER VERNON: Do we have any plans to do something with it? MR. BOSI: Not that I'm aware of. CHAIRMAN FRYER: We have our retreat there. COMMISSIONER VERNON: It's like a camp-out. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Future commission meetings. COMMISSIONER VERNON: No, nothing on the books? MR. BOSI: (Shakes head.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. All right. No one else is signaling, so we'll go to our registered -- our speaker on Zoom, please. MR. SABO: Chairman Fryer, it is Kathryn Kehlmeier on Zoom. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Ms. Kehlmeier, are you there? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Kathryn Kehlmeier. MS. KEHLMEIER: I'm here. Can you hear me? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yes, ma'am, now we can. MS. KEHLMEIER: Thank you so very much. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yes. You have five minutes. MS. KEHLMEIER: Thank you so very much for hearing me. I would just like to show my support for Mr. Case's plan for the 109 single-family homes on what the CID calls as Parcel 13 and what you used to be the old dormitory. I think the single-family homes will be a better fit for the new construction that has been going on the south side of 41 and also, if it was to remain RT, when the property was up for sale, we had numerous interest in putting in a motorcoach resort, which would bring 300 pads, possibly, to that 50 acres back there. So in my opinion -- and I would appreciate the Commission going ahead and approving the zoning change to the residential; better fit for Port of the Islands, better use of the land, and that's all I have to say, and thank you so very much for the time. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you, ma'am. Commissioner Shea. COMMISSIONER SHEA: This is really for Mike, not for the speaker. 5.B.a Packet Pg. 77 Attachment: 11-16-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27365 : 11/16/2023 CCPC Meeting minutes) November 16, 2023 Page 25 of 31 CHAIRMAN FRYER: Oh, okay, yeah. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Just confirming, this site is not on septic; it has a public wastewater facility that goes -- that's built into the project, or are they all on septics and wells? MR. BOSI: I believe the proposal will be for an eventual connection to the existing utility that the Port of the Island provides. COMMISSIONER SHEA: That's what I thought I read. Okay. Thank you. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Any other public comment registered? If not, any -- Commissioner Vernon. COMMISSIONER VERNON: No. I just wanted to wrap up by saying I really, Ms. Passidomo, appreciate the conciseness of your presentation and your preparation and ability to answer the questions, and it's nice to see a new face rather than the same old guys. So thank you. Look forward to seeing you again soon. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Thank you. CHAIRMAN FRYER: I agree completely with that. Thank you. MS. PASSIDOMO: No slight. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Let's see. So we'll close -- no. Anybody else in the room want to be heard on this? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Seeing no hands up, we'll close the public comment segment of this hearing, and the matter falls to us to deliberate. There is no EAC vote because the property's already been cleared. So what do I hear? Commissioner Schumacher. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: Thank you, Chair. Ms. Passidomo, thank you for your presentation. I think as you pointed out, you're going to 2.1 dwelling units per acre, which it could be at 630. So I think -- I think it's a no-brainer. I think it's -- I'll make the motion to approve as presented. COMMISSIONER VERNON: I'll second. CHAIRMAN FRYER: All right. Is there any further discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: I didn't ask you if you had any rebuttal, but I don't think you do, do you? MS. PASSIDOMO: I don't. I just -- I just respectfully request your recommendation of approval. And just factually, to Mr. Bosi's point, we have worked with the POI to reserve utility hookup. So it will be on -- eventually on actual sewer and water. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. So this is an RPUDZ, and it's been moved and seconded to approve for recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners. Any further discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: If not, all those in favor, please say aye. COMMISSIONER VERNON: Aye. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Aye. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: Aye. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: (No verbal response.) 5.B.a Packet Pg. 78 Attachment: 11-16-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27365 : 11/16/2023 CCPC Meeting minutes) November 16, 2023 Page 26 of 31 CHAIRMAN FRYER: Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: It passes unanimously. Many thanks to Ms. Passidomo, applicant team, staff. Mr. Bosi. MR. BOSI: It just came to my attention -- Mr. Bellows reminded -- I don't believe that we approved the minutes that were before you at the beginning. CHAIRMAN FRYER: We sure didn't. Thank you. MR. BOSI: As well as -- and I wanted to know if -- does the Planning Commission, after your approval of minutes, do you want to talk a little bit about potential modifications to the continuance policy under new business? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yes. Thank you for reminding me on that as well. I appreciate that. THE COURT REPORTER: Chair, I didn't hear Mr. Klucik vote, if you could just ask him. CHAIRMAN FRYER: You didn't hear Mr. Bosi? THE COURT REPORTER: Mr. Klucik. COMMISSIONER SHEA: No, Mr. Klucik vote. THE COURT REPORTER: I didn't hear his vote. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Oh, we haven't -- COMMISSIONER SHEA: No, his previous vote. COMMISSIONER VERNON: Previous vote. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Oh, his vote was a yes. THE COURT REPORTER: I didn't hear him. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Oh, Commissioner Klucik, can you revote, please? COMMISSIONER VERNON: Robb? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Well, we will -- COMMISSIONER SHEA: I thought I heard him, too. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yeah, but she's got to hear him. COMMISSIONER SHEA: She's got better ears. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yeah. You might want to put "inaudible" in. It's not going to matter. Yeah. Okay. We have two sets of minutes before us this morning for action. First for the October 5 meeting and then the October 19 meeting. Is there any need to vote on these separately? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: If not, I'd entertain a motion to approve both sets of minutes. Is there such a motion? COMMISSIONER SHEA: So moved. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: Second. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Any further discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: If not, all those in favor of approving the minutes of the two meetings, October 5 and October 19, please say aye. COMMISSIONER VERNON: Aye. 5.B.a Packet Pg. 79 Attachment: 11-16-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27365 : 11/16/2023 CCPC Meeting minutes) November 16, 2023 Page 27 of 31 COMMISSIONER SHEA: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Aye. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: Aye. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: It passes unanimously. Thank you. COMMISSIONER SHEA: He said "aye." CHAIRMAN FRYER: Commissioner Klucik, are you -- you're able to hear us, sir? COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Yeah. I voted yes on both of the last two votes. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Oh, okay. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: And the one -- well, those two votes plus the prior one. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay, good. We've got -- it will show that, then. Thank you. ***All right. So that concludes our hearings for today, and it takes us to old business. And, you know, I guess we could call this old business. It really doesn't matter, but the question is, is do we want to polish up our Resolution 2023-01? And one of the -- one of the thoughts I had would be that we would be authorized or we could delegate to staff with specific criteria, and the specific criteria we might want to make more clear and more detailed than the ones we have here, to grant the continuance on our behalf with or without consulting with me. It was mentioned that that would be one approach. That's fine if you think it's necessary. It doesn't matter to me one way or the other. But that way we would -- and, certainly, if a matter is continued without our action, we would want to know that immediately so that we don't have to spend time on the matter. So it -- it would behoove the applicant, if they're really wanting to see a continuance, to get that request in soon enough so that we can prevent people from having to work the weekend before our Thursday meeting on a matter that's not going to be heard. So do we want to have -- Commissioner Schumacher. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: I think that it would be appropriate for Mike to, in essence, make that decision and bring it to you and say, these are the reasons for the continuance, and you as the Chair say, yes, I think that's appropriate. I think that at that time if there's a discord and you don't -- and you disagree with the staff's recommendation for a continuance, I think that's the only time it should come before us. But I think nine out of 10 times Mr. Bosi's going to be, like, there's a reason for a continuance, it's a correct reason. It's not like they just aren't ready to go. It's -- there's something factual there, and we should -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yeah. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: -- move forward in that manner. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. We could -- I'd entertain a motion for staff, working with the County Attorney's Office, to revise our resolution to incorporate the comments that would involve staff making the decision. And we want you -- we want you to draft more explicit criteria for you to follow than the ones that are in here. There 5.B.a Packet Pg. 80 Attachment: 11-16-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27365 : 11/16/2023 CCPC Meeting minutes) November 16, 2023 Page 28 of 31 are three different ones. But think it through and see if you can tighten it up a little bit to squeeze the subjectivity as much as possible out of it, and then I believe it's the consensus of the Planning Commission that you and I would then consult over that. And if we agree, then it would be considered a continuance. Mr. Bosi. MR. BOSI: And not -- and I agree that would be an improvement, and staff will definitely take that action and bring you back something that follows that accord. The one thing that we will not be able to address, and I just don't know how to do it, our advertising is 20 days before our hearing, so that's -- that horse is out of the barn 20 days, and most times we don't get -- if we get a continuance request prior to 20 days, we pull the ad. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yeah. MR. BOSI: So once it's advertised, I have no idea how that we can -- when I get -- when I get it a week before -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: You can't. You can't. MR. BOSI: -- I don't know what I can do to notify the public because -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: We can't. But the fail-safe, the stopgap here for the public is that if we have people show up and want to be heard on the day in question, we'll hear them. And we're going to incorporate those comments into the transcript. So that's, I think, about as much as we can do. COMMISSIONER SHEA: But you publish the agenda package on the web page. You could update it. At least go there the day before, check and see if the agenda's been revised. MR. BOSI: We did update -- we did update this agenda to give a note that these items were being continued. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Okay. MR. BOSI: Yes. It was only -- COMMISSIONER SHEA: That's probably the best that you can do. MR. BOSI: Yeah. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yeah, I think so. MR. BOSI: Okay. CHAIRMAN FRYER: All right. So it's been moved. Was there a second? I don't recall. Oh, Commissioner Vernon, did you want to be heard first? COMMISSIONER VERNON: Yeah, yeah. I just -- I guess my thought -- and it's never going to be perfect, and I don't think it needs to be perfect. We're just trying to deter this careless last-minute throw at, hey, we're not going to be there. So it seems to me, however we tighten the rule up and pull the subjectivity out of it, as the Chairman suggested, I think that if they don't follow the rules, the staff should deny it. And then if it's legal, then -- if it's denied, allow the Chairman to exercise his discretion without communicating with us to override that. Because if it's -- if every time somebody asks for a continuance they find a way to say, come on, Mike, and you grant it, it's not going to have any teeth. So I want it to sort of -- I want people to actually be a little worried; if they don't follow the rules, it's actually going to be enforced. MR. BOSI: And as I understand your motion, whether I make a decision to grant a continuance or not grant a continuance, that's only after consulting with the Chair. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Maybe we need to even put another tooth in there that the 5.B.a Packet Pg. 81 Attachment: 11-16-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27365 : 11/16/2023 CCPC Meeting minutes) November 16, 2023 Page 29 of 31 Chair needs to concur. MR. BOSI: Yes. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Would that work? COMMISSIONER VERNON: Oh, yeah. Like I said, I don't think there's a perfect, so whatever you think works. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. COMMISSIONER VERNON: And then the other thing is, you know -- and Robb brought this up as well, and so did Paul. The concern is -- the second big concern is the public, and they take a day off work, come, it's very frustrating. Would it be appropriate to let them speak twice if they want to? I mean, if they show up twice, they can speak twice. I mean, it's three extra minutes or five extra minutes. CHAIRMAN FRYER: I kind of did that on the fly. Based upon how we have previously done it, the people get one shot at it, but that's more my view of what -- how we have historically done it rather than how we're required to do it. And so I think if it's the wish of the Planning Commission, we can allow people to speak again, you know. COMMISSIONER VERNON: And we can suggest to them, if you're just going to say the same thing over, we heard it the first time. But we're trying to sort of put some teeth into it to sort of deter these willy-nilly continuances at the last minute. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Well, how about this, that we will allow a member of the public who's already spoken to provide new material. And we're going to have the transcript of what they say in front of us. So if we -- if they're talking and we're reading along the transcript, and we'll say, hold on now; you've already made that point. COMMISSIONER VERNON: I think that works for me. COMMISSIONER SHEA: I'm okay if they make the same point again. I mean, if they hadn't come today, we wouldn't have realized we needed more information to make sure we get the right experts at the next one, and I think they should have the right to say the same thing next time. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: I agree. COMMISSIONER VERNON: I'm okay with that. I mean, I'm not -- you know, none of these are hills to die on. I'm just throwing out ideas. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Mr. Bosi. MR. BOSI: And I want to clarify. That -- we have no -- there's no provision in the continuance policy to addresses this issue. That's a procedural issue that you guys are making the determination in terms of how -- if you want them to be able to speak at both hearings. That's -- each case will be up to -- will be up to you, and I think you're just kind of arriving upon a consensus of what you think of how your policy should move forward. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yes. I'm thinking, though, we'd like to squeeze some discretion out from us as well. And if we're going to allow some public speakers to speak twice, we probably ought to say they all can, within the framework of the three- or five-minute time limit each time. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: I agree with the Chair. And I think, as you said, if it's new information, it's appreciated, if it's the same thing they had already stated. The other concern I would have is if, like, for example, Mr. Dixon and Mr. Garcia show up, and then they give their time to somebody else and they had already spoken -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: That's a good question. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: -- so there's no reason for them to give up 5.B.a Packet Pg. 82 Attachment: 11-16-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27365 : 11/16/2023 CCPC Meeting minutes) November 16, 2023 Page 30 of 31 their time so somebody else has an extra 10 minutes to present your case. COMMISSIONER SHEA: I would agree. I would make that caveat that if you've already spoken, you have to use that time if you want to speak again. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: Exactly. COMMISSIONER SHEA: But I like hearing it again because I'm old, and my memory -- I thought they were both very good, and I'd like to hear it again in six weeks when they -- but -- COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: I'm with you. According to my wife, I don't listen at all. So I will gladly hear that a second time over. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. COMMISSIONER SHEA: And if it becomes cumbersome, we can change it, since it's a process, a procedure. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: Correct. CHAIRMAN FRYER: So are we asking staff to put all of that additional stuff into the resolution? COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: What do you think, Mr. Bosi? Do you think it should be procedural at that point in time? MS. ASHTON-CICKO: Let's just put the continuance information in that you requested to delegate the authority to Mr. Bosi to grant a continuance with the Chair's approval. CHAIRMAN FRYER: What about, though, allowing people to speak on both days? Because if we do put it in there, it takes some discretion away from us, which I think is advisable. But what do you think? MS. ASHTON-CICKO: Well, I personally think that you should have the discretion at the hearing as to whether you want to hear a second time. There are also some Florida Statute considerations regarding the right of speakers to speak. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. We'll leave that out. MS. ASHTON-CICKO: Yeah. CHAIRMAN FRYER: That's fine. Thank you. Mr. Bosi, is that okay with you? MR. BOSI: (Nods head.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: All right. So we're going to see a redraft of this resolution and -- probably at our next meeting, but maybe not. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: Just for clarity, Mr. Bosi, those could -- if -- according to Mr. Yovanovich, if his client pulls the Fiddler's Creek, the next available would be -- I'm sorry, what was that? The -- MR. BOSI: January 4th. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: January 4th, and then if Fiddler Creek still is on the agenda, then it would be pushed to February 1st? MR. BOSI: Correct. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: Okay. Thank you. CHAIRMAN FRYER: That's the current plan. All right. Any other old business? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: So we'll be seeing a draft coming back on what we just talked about. 5.B.a Packet Pg. 83 Attachment: 11-16-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27365 : 11/16/2023 CCPC Meeting minutes) November 16, 2023 Page 31 of 31 Any new business to come before us? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Any public comment? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: I don't see any members of the public, so I assume there is not. And, therefore, without objection, we're adjourned. ******* There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair at 10:22 a.m. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION _____________________________________ EDWIN FRYER, CHAIRMAN These minutes approved by the Board on __________, as presented ______ or as corrected ______. TRANSCRIPT PREPARED ON BEHALF OF FORT MYERS COURT REPORTING BY TERRI L. LEWIS, RPR, FPR-C, COURT REPORTER AND NOTARY PUBLIC. 5.B.a Packet Pg. 84 Attachment: 11-16-2023 CCPC Meeting Minutes (27365 : 11/16/2023 CCPC Meeting minutes) 12/07/2023 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Planning Commission Item Number: 9.A.1 Doc ID: 27093 Item Summary: PL20220001010 - GMPA - Mattson at Vanderbilt - An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners amending Ordinance 89-05, as amended, the Collier County Growth Management Plan, specifically amending the Future Land Use Element and Map Series by changing the land use designation of property from Urban, Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict to Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict, to allow a maximum density of 150 multifamily rental units with affordable housing, and furthermore directing transmittal of the adopted amendment to the Florida Department of Commerce. The subject property is located on the north side of Vanderbilt Beach Road, approximately 828 feet from the intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Livingston Road, in Section 31, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 5.88± acres. [Coordinator: Kathy Eastley, AICP, Planner III] (Companion Item PUDZ PL20220001011) Meeting Date: 12/07/2023 Prepared by: Title: – Zoning Name: Katherine Eastley 11/09/2023 1:51 PM Submitted by: Title: Zoning Director – Zoning Name: Mike Bosi 11/09/2023 1:51 PM Approved By: Review: Planning Commission Diane Lynch Review item Completed 11/13/2023 5:43 PM Operations & Regulatory Management Donna Guitard Review Item Completed 11/16/2023 12:27 PM Zoning James Sabo Review Item Completed 11/21/2023 9:55 AM Zoning Ray Bellows Review Item Completed 11/21/2023 11:20 AM Zoning Mike Bosi Division Director Completed 11/21/2023 1:37 PM Growth Management Community Development Department James C French GMD Deputy Dept Head Completed 11/27/2023 4:22 PM Planning Commission Ray Bellows Meeting Pending 12/07/2023 3:00 PM 9.A.1 Packet Pg. 85 PL20230001010 1 STAFF REPORT COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT, ZONING DIVISION, COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING SECTION HEARING DATE: DECEMBER 7, 2023 SUBJECT: PL20220001010 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT (GMPA); MATTSON AT VANDERBILT SUBDISTRICT (ADOPTION HEARING) COMPANION TO: PL20220001011 MATTSON AT VANDERBILT RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) ELEMENTS: FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT (FLUE) AGENT/APPLICANT: Agents: D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, FL 34134 Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 Naples, FL 34103 Owner/Applicant: 3333/3375 VBR, LLC 3838 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 402 Naples, FL 34103 GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The 5.88± acre property is on the north side of Vanderbilt Beach Road, approximately 825 feet east of the intersection of Livingston Road. The property has approximately 490 feet of frontage on Vanderbilt Beach Road and is within the Urban Estates Planning Community in Section 31, Township 48 South, Range 26 East. The site is comprised of two parcels: a 1.93± acre parcel that is developed with Naples Safari Animal Hospital & Pet Resort and a 3.91± acre parcel with an equestrian facility. 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 86 Attachment: Mattson at Vanderbilt CCPC Staff Report (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) PL20230001010 2 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 87 Attachment: Mattson at Vanderbilt CCPC Staff Report (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) PL20230001010 3 REQUESTED ACTION: The applicant proposes a Small-Scale Comprehensive Plan amendment (a/k/a GMPA) to the Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP) Future Land Use Element (FLUE) to amend the existing designation of Urban, Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict to create a new subdistrict entitled Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict. The petition proposes to amend the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) to create a new map (Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict) in the FLUM series to identify the subdistrict. The proposed GMP Amendment is attached as Ordinance Exhibit “A.” PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Proposal To create the Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict to allow a maximum of 150 multi- family rental units on the 5.88-acre property, the property (or site) is comprised of 2 parcels resulting in a density of 25.5 dwelling units per acre (DU/A). The purpose of the proposed subdistrict is to allow greater density than can be achieved through the GMP Density Rating System. The proposal includes a commitment that 22.6% of the units will be income-restricted and rent- restricted for affordable housing, with half of these units (17 units) to be income-restricted and rent-restricted for those making up to 80% of the Area Median Income (AMI) and the remaining half (17 units) to be income-restricted and rent-restricted for those making up to 100% of AMI. The affordable housing commitment is for 30 years. In addition to the increased density, the subdistrict proposes reducing the LDC-required minimum useable open space from 60% to 40%. A companion petition (PL20230001010) proposes to rezone the 2 parcels from Rural Agricultural District (A) to Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD). EXISTING CONDITIONS: Subject Property: The 5.88-acre proposed Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict is comprised of 2 parcels: •A 1.93± acre parcel is located on the western end of the subdistrict and is currently developed with a veterinarian office and kennels. This property is currently zoned Rural Agricultural (A) and has a Future Land Use Designation of Urban Residential Subdistrict. •A 3.91± acre parcel is located on the eastern end of the subdistrict and contains the now-closed Bobbin Hollow Equestrian Center. This parcel is also zoned Rural Agricultural (A) and has a Future Land Use Designation of Urban Residential Subdistrict. Surrounding Lands: North: Future Land Use Designation: Urban Residential Subdistrict. Zoned: Pelican Marsh PUD. Land Use: Golf Course, then residential. East: Future Land Use Designation: Urban Residential Subdistrict. Zoned: The Vanderbilt Trust CFPUD. Land Use: Sandalwood Village Independent and Assisted Living Facility (ALF). South: (across Vanderbilt Beach Road) Future Land Use Designation: Urban Residential Subdistrict. Zoned: Vineyards PUD. Land Use: Residential uses. West: Future Land Use Designation: Urban Residential Subdistrict. Zoned: Bradford Square MPUD. Land Use: Independent and Assisted Living Facility (ALF). 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 88 Attachment: Mattson at Vanderbilt CCPC Staff Report (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) PL20230001010 4 In summary, the existing land uses in the larger surrounding area consist of low-density residential use and Independent and Assisted Living Facilities, categorized as institutional use. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS: Density The existing Future Land Use Element (FLUE), Future Land Use Map (FLUM), and Map Series of the Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP) designate the subject property as Urban, Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict. The Urban Residential Subdistrict allows a wide variety of non-residential uses, including childcare centers, churches, and public schools, which include charter schools, private schools, essential services, safety service facilities, utility and communication facilities, agricultural uses, parks, open space, and recreational uses. All these uses are allowed under the existing “A” zoning, either by conditional use or permitted by right. The Urban Residential Subdistrict provides for higher-density residential uses, with density determined by the Density Rating System; however, in no case shall the maximum density exceed 16 dwelling units per acre in the Urban Residential Subdistrict. Staff calculation of the maximum allowable (eligible) density, based upon the existing FLUE designation and applicable Density Rating System criteria, is 59 dwelling units, or 10 DU/A (see table below). 4 DU/A Base Density +3 DU/A Residential In-fill density bonus +3 DU/A TCMA-Transportation Concurrency Management Areas density bonus 10 DU/A Maximum eligible density for market-rate development only +6 DU/A Affordable Housing Density Bonus per LDC Sec. 2.06.00 16 DU/A Maximum eligible density if it includes affordable housing per LDC Note: eligible density is not an entitlement, as stated in the Density Rating System The rezoning proposal is for 150 multi-family rental units on 5.88 acres, resulting in a density of 25.5 DU/A. This is 15.5 dwelling units above the maximum density of 10 DU/A that can be achieved through the Density Rating System for market-rate development and greater than the maximum 16 DU/A maximum allowed in the Urban Residential Subdistrict. The proposed density cannot be achieved through the Density Rating System; therefore, the proposal is inconsistent with the FLUE. To achieve the proposed density of 25.5 DU/A, a GMP Amendment (GMPA) is required. Any comprehensive plan amendment to increase residential density within the Mixed Use District shall only provide for that density increase via utilization of the transfer of development right (TDR) program, except TDR credits shall not be required for projects determined by the Board of County Commissioners to have a reasonably sufficient public benefit. Staff review includes a comparative analysis of land use and density/intensity of proximate development. The proposed Mattson at Vanderbilt Subdistrict is flanked on the east and west by Independent and Assisted Living communities, which are classified as institutional uses that utilize Floor Area Ratio (FAR) to determine the intensity of use rather than density associated with residential dwelling units per acre. Surrounding residential communities include Pelican Marsh 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 89 Attachment: Mattson at Vanderbilt CCPC Staff Report (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) PL20230001010 5 PUD to the north (and west of the adjacent ALF), Vineyards PUD to the south across Vanderbilt Beach Road, and Wilshire Lakes PUD east of the adjacent ALF. These communities are low- density residential uses with less than four DU/A; the highest density in the vicinity is the Vineyards at 3.62 DU/A. The Bermuda Islands Apartments are located south-southwest of the project area within the Vineyards PUD and consist of 360 multi-family dwelling units on 23.26 acres for a site density of 15.48 DU/A. The overall PUD density of the Vineyards is 3.62 DU/A. The two ALF developments, Bradford Square PUD, on the west, and The Vanderbilt Trust PUD a/k/a Sandalwood Village, on the east, are part of one GMP Subdistrict, the Vanderbilt Beach Road Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict, which restricts residential density to 16 DU/A. That subdistrict also allows most uses in the C-1 through C-3 commercial zoning districts – 100,000 square feet on the westerly parcel (Bradford Square MPUD, also approved to include those commercial uses) and 80,000 square feet on the easterly parcel (The Vanderbilt Trust CFPUD, approved for group housing only – ALF, nursing home, etc.). Notwithstanding the commercial uses allowed by the subdistrict, staff believes it unlikely those two PUDs would be redeveloped with commercial uses given that both were developed within the last seven years, and each has an “improved value” in excess of $20 million. Based on the surrounding neighborhood, the proposed density is exponentially greater than the surrounding residential communities. Typical retail and commercial service uses are located approximately one mile west of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Airport Road North, but the area generally comprises low-density residential PUDs. Prior petitions for a GMPA have achieved density increases through the provision of affordable housing or other public benefit; however, at 25.5 DU/A, the proposed Mattson at Vanderbilt density is among the highest of recently approved residential projects, even those with an affordable housing component. The ‘standard’ affordable housing provision of 22.6% of the units would result in a maximum of 34 affordable units; 50% would be provided to those earning up to 80% of Annual Median Income (AMI) and 50% up to 100 % AMI. 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 90 Attachment: Mattson at Vanderbilt CCPC Staff Report (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) PL20230001010 6 Adequate justification for the 25.5 DU/A cannot be found based upon 1) the low-density residential character of the surrounding community and 2) the provision of only 22.6% affordable housing units. Staff recommends a reduction in the proposed density to 16 DU/A consistent with the Vanderbilt Beach Road Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict; however, if the Planning Commission recommends the GMPA for approval, staff urges consideration of requiring additional commensurate public benefit, which may be in the form of additional affordable housing units for this subdistrict to be granted the requested increase in density to 25.5 DU/A. At a minimum, staff recommends considering requiring 30% of the proposed units to be income-restricted and rent- restricted. The additional units derived from the increased percentage should be income- restricted and rent-restricted for those making up to 100% AMI. The following chart shows the recent GMPA and PUD approvals to increase density and the required affordable housing: FLUE Subdistrict Number of Units Acres DU per acre Affordable Housing Units Vanderbilt Beach Road Residential (Ascend) 208 17.5 11.9 34% / 71 Airport Carlisle 336 27.78 12.1 22.6% / 76 Amerisite 303 18.95 16 22.6% / 69 Carman Dr 212 15.4 13.77 22.6% / 48 Immokalee Rd Interchange (Blue Coral) 234 9.35 25 30% / 70 Mattson at Vanderbilt 150 5.88 25.5 22.6% / 34 Development Standards In addition to the use and density/intensity of surrounding properties, the physical character of the adjacent communities is reviewed for uniformity and compatibility; however, development standards are administered by the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) and include setbacks and buffers, building height, and open space. Adjacent properties are developed with building heights of three to four-story structures; Sandalwood Village on the east is three stories atop one level of structured parking, with a maximum actual height of 62-feet, and Bradford Square on the west is a three-story structure with a maximum actual building height of 53-feet. Minimum buffers are provided in each of these developments and are generally consistent with those proposed for Mattson at Vanderbilt. Setbacks from Vanderbilt Beach Road are increased to 50-feet for Mattson at Vanderbilt, whereas the adjacent Bradford Square has a setback of 35-feet, and The Vanderbilt Trust PUD a/k/a Sandalwood Village setback is 25-feet. Side setbacks vary, with a high of 75-feet proposed on Mattson at Vanderbilt and decreasing to a minimum of 15-feet on the western boundary of Sandalwood Village. Open Space is a requirement of all Planned Unit Developments (PUDs), and those composed entirely of residential dwelling units require a minimum of 60% useable open space pursuant to Section 4.07.02.G.1 of the LDC. The LDC defines usable open space as: Open space, usable: Active or passive recreation areas such as parks, playgrounds, tennis courts, golf courses, beach frontage, waterways, lakes, 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 91 Attachment: Mattson at Vanderbilt CCPC Staff Report (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) PL20230001010 7 lagoons, floodplains, nature trails , and other similar open spaces. Usable open space areas shall also include those portions of areas set aside for preservation of native vegetation, required yards (setbacks), and landscaped areas, which are accessible to and usable by residents of an individual lot, the development, or the general public. Open wat er area beyond the perimeter of the site, street rights -of- way, driveways, off-street parking and loading areas, shall not be counted towards required Usable Open Space. The proposed Mattson at Vanderbilt subdistrict language proposes 40% usable open space for the overall site area. The applicant's justification for this reduction to be located in the subdistrict language is that it is a developer commitment and provides further justification for the reduction: •The project is “…redevelopment and an infill residential project on 5.9 +/- acres.” •The project is centrally located within the site. •The intent is to maintain comparable building heights with the adjacent ALFs. •The provision of an enhanced buffer on the northern property line adjacent to the Pelican Marsh Golf Course “…to ensure compatibility and increase effective open space for the site.” Staff does not support the relief from zoning standards located within the GMP subdistrict. There is an appropriate process to request a deviation in the companion PUD. The justification for this reduction in the GMP subdistrict due to the request being a developer commitment is not factual since the request is a developer reduction of an LDC requirement. Staff has historically requested standards required by the GMP to be included in the subdistrict language or when developer commitments exceed the LDC minimum in providing greater assurance of completion (since a PUD Amendment could be utilized to remove the commitment in the zoning). The GMP does not include requirements for open space within the Urban, Mixed Use District, or Urban Residential Subdistrict; therefore, the open space requirement is solely an LDC issue. Zoning and Comprehensive Planning staff agree that this reduction should be requested through the companion zoning petition. The LDC requires that residential-only PUDs provide a minimum of 60% useable open space, and this should not be waived simply by adding a lesser standard in the GMP subdistrict. In addition to the requirement being removed from the GMP, staff does not support the reduction in useable open space for a dense, urban-style apartment complex. The density of 25.5 DU/A cannot meet required standards, such as the useable open space minimum and parking, for which a deviation is sought in the companion PUD petition. The justification provided for the reduction is not adequate. The inability to comply with LDC standards for required useable open space and parking appears to be a self-created circumstance caused by requesting such a high-density development. Should the Planning Commission choose to recommend approval of the reduction via the PUD petition, staff would suggest that additional public benefit be required to offset the loss of open space. This could be in the form of additional affordable housing. Residential Needs Analysis Staff, developers, and the public have well documented the need for affordable housing in Collier County. However, the need may vary by geographic area within the county and income affordability level. Further, if the need is established, the proposed site is evaluated to determine if it is the appropriate location to fulfill that need. 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 92 Attachment: Mattson at Vanderbilt CCPC Staff Report (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) PL20230001010 8 The applicant provided the 2017 Urban Land Use Institute report to support the plan amendment; however, no specifics were provided regarding the report, nor was a locational analysis provided to analyze the appropriateness of this use at this site. The appropriateness of the site for residential use and the requested density must be justified, and the provision of affordable housing units should be discussed in terms of proximity to employment, goods and services, access, and transit availability. When additional information was requested, the agent responded, "The applicant is of the opinion that the demand for affordable housing units in Collier County is well-documented, and no further data is necessary to support the proposed request." A GMPA must, according to state statute, provide sufficient data and analysis to justify the proposed amendment. Staff has not found this standard to be satisfied. Compatibility: Given the area's residential character, staff finds that the requested residential use is compatible with the surrounding area. However, staff does not support the proposed density of 25.5 DU/A, which is significantly higher than, and out of character with, the surrounding community and potentially incompatible. Environmental Review: The property is located in an Urban Mix Use district. The property is zoned Ag, with 2 parcels totaling 5.88 acres. The request is to create an Urban Mixed Use district Urban Residential Subdistrict. CCME Policy 6.1.1 and Obj 7.1 have been addressed; the property has been developed and mostly impacted. A tree survey will be required to determine tree preservation amounts if needed. No EAC is required. Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) Review: Environmental review staff has found this project consistent with the Conservation & Coastal Management Element (CCME). The project site has been cleared; no preservation is required. The project site is 5.88 acres and consists of 12 native trees meeting the preservation standards. Transportation Planning Review: Based on the TIS, State Statues, the 2021, and the 2022 AUIR, the subject PUD can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan. The Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) indicates that the adjacent roadway network has sufficient capacity to accommodate this project within the 5-year planning period. Public Utilities Review: The project lies within the regional potable water service area and the North County Water Reclamation Facility’s wastewater service area of the Collier County Water-Sewer District (CCWSD). Water and wastewater services are available via existing infrastructure within the adjacent right-of-way. Sufficient water and wastewater treatment capacities are available. Any improvements to the CCWSD’s water or wastewater systems necessary to provide sufficient capacity to serve the project will be the responsibility of the owner/developer and will be conveyed to the CCWSD at no cost to the County at the time of utility acceptance. CRITERIA FOR GMP AMENDMENTS FLORIDA STATUTES: Data and analysis requirements for comprehensive plans and plan amendments are noted in Chapter 163, F.S., specifically listed below. 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 93 Attachment: Mattson at Vanderbilt CCPC Staff Report (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) PL20230001010 9 Section 163.3177(1)(f), Florida Statutes: (f)All mandatory and optional elements of the comprehensive plan and plan amendments shall be based upon relevant and appropriate data and an analysis by the local government that may include, but not be limited to, surveys, studies, community goals and vision, and other data available at the time of adoption of the comprehensive plan or plan amendment. To be based on data means to react to it in an appropriate way and to the extent necessary, indicated by the data available on that particular subject at the time of adoption of the plan or plan amendment at issue. 1.Surveys, studies, and data utilized in the preparation of the comprehensive plan may not be deemed a part of the comprehensive plan unless adopted as a part of it. Copies of such studies, surveys, data, and supporting documents for proposed plans and plan amendments shall be made available for public inspection, and copies of such plans shall be made available to the public upon payment of reasonable charges for reproduction. Support data or summaries are not subject to the compliance review process, but the comprehensive plan must be based on appropriate data. Support data or summaries may be used to aid in the determination of compliance and consistency. 2.Data must be taken from professionally accepted sources. The application of a methodology utilized in data collection or whether a particular methodology is professionally accepted may be evaluated. However, the evaluation may not include whether one accepted methodology is better than another. Original data collection by local governments is not required. However, local governments may use original data so long as methodologies are professionally accepted. 3.The comprehensive plan shall be based upon permanent and seasonal population estimates and projections, which shall either be those published by the Office of Economic and Demographic Research or generated by the local government based upon a professionally acceptable methodology. The plan must be based on at least the minimum amount of land required to accommodate the medium projections published by the Office of Economic and Demographic Research for at least a 10-year planning period unless otherwise limited under s. 380.05, including related rules of the Administration Commission. Absent physical limitations on population growth, population projections for each municipality and the unincorporated area within a county must, at a minimum, be reflective of each area’s proportional share of the total county population and the total county population growth. Section 163.3177(6)(a)2. Florida Statutes: 2.The future land use plan and plan amendments shall be based upon surveys, studies, and data regarding the area, as applicable, including: a.The amount of land required to accommodate anticipated growth. b.The projected permanent and seasonal population of the area. c.The character of undeveloped land. d.The availability of water supplies, public facilities, and services. e.The need for redevelopment, including the renewal of blighted areas and the elimination of nonconforming uses inconsistent with the community's character. f.The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to or closely proximate to military installations. 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 94 Attachment: Mattson at Vanderbilt CCPC Staff Report (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) PL20230001010 10 g.The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to an airport as defined in s. 330.35 and consistent with s. 333.02. h.The discouragement of urban sprawl. i.The need for job creation, capital investment, and economic development that will strengthen and diversify the community’s economy. j.The need to modify land uses and development patterns within antiquated subdivisions. Section 163.3177(6)(a)8. Florida Statutes: (a)A future land use plan element designating proposed future general distribution, location, and extent of the uses of land for residential uses, commercial uses, industry, agriculture, recreation, conservation, education, public facilities, and other categories of the public and private uses of land. The approximate acreage and the general range of density or intensity of use shall be provided for the gross land area included in each existing land use category. The element shall establish the long-term end toward which land use programs and activities are ultimately directed. 8.Future land use map amendments shall be based upon the following analyses: a.An analysis of the availability of facilities and services. b.An analysis of the suitability of the plan amendment for its proposed use considering the character of the undeveloped land, soils, topography, natural resources, and historic resources on site. c.An analysis of the minimum amount of land needed to achieve the goals and requirements of this section. The petitioner must provide appropriate and relevant data and analysis to address the statutory requirements for a Plan Amendment. For this petition, a narrative justification was provided in Exhibit V.D. “Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict (PL20220001010) Growth Management” as well as in response letters regarding staff concerns relative to the lack of needs assessment/market analysis and the proposed reduction of open space. Section 163.3187 Florida Statutes: [qualifications to follow the small-scale GMPA process] Process for adoption of small-scale comprehensive plan amendment. (1) A small-scale development amendment may be adopted under the following conditions: (a) The proposed amendment involves a use of 50 acres or fewer. [The subject site comprises 5.88± acres.] (b) The proposed amendment does not involve a text change to the goals, policies, and objectives of the local government’s comprehensive plan but only proposes a land use change to the future land use map for a site-specific small-scale development activity. However, text changes that relate directly to and are adopted simultaneously with the small-scale future land use map amendment shall be permissible under this section. [This amendment does include a text change to the Comprehensive Plan and those text changes are directly related to the proposed future land use map amendment.] (c) The property that is the subject of the proposed amendment is not located within an area of critical state concern unless the project subject to the proposed amendment involves the construction of affordable housing units meeting the criteria of s. 420.0004(3) and is located within an area of critical state concern designated by s. 380.0552 or by the Administration 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 95 Attachment: Mattson at Vanderbilt CCPC Staff Report (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) PL20230001010 11 Commission pursuant to s. 380.05(1). [The subject property is not located within an Area of Critical State Concern.] (4) Comprehensive plans may only be amended in such a way as to preserve the internal consistency of the plan pursuant to s. 163.3177. Corrections, updates, or modifications of current costs which were set out as part of the comprehensive plan shall not, for the purposes of this act, be deemed to be amendments. [This amendment preserves the internal consistency of the plan and is not a correction, update, or modification of current costs that were set out as part of the comprehensive plan.] NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM) NOTES: The applicant conducted a NIM on May 24, 2023, at the Collier County Headquarters Library, Sugden Theater, located at 2385 Orange Blossom Drive in Naples. The meeting commenced at approximately 5:30 p.m. and ended at approximately 5:40 p.m. There were no in-person attendees other than the applicant’s team and county staff, and two people from the general public attended via Zoom. D. Wayne Arnold, AICP, the agent, gave a brief presentation explaining the NIM process for approval and providing an overview of the proposed project. The only question was regarding where to find project information online. The NIM transcript and PowerPoint presentation are included in the CCPC backup materials. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: •There are no adverse environmental impacts as a result of this petition. •There are no known historic or archaeological resources on the subject site. •There are no transportation or public utility-related concerns as a result of this petition. •There are no concerns about impacts on other public infrastructure. •This project may create impacts on the surrounding area due to the proposed density, which is not in character with the surrounding low-density residential development. However, this can be made more acceptable by increasing the public benefit provided by this petition and providing the LDC-required amount of useable open space. •Staff does not support including a useable open space requirement in the proposed Subdistrict text; rather, it supports deferring to the LDC. Further, staff does not support a reduction of that useable open space requirement below the LDC-required 60%. •The petitioner is proposing 22.6% (34 DUs) of the total requested 150 DUs as affordable units as a “public benefit” to satisfy the requirement that all GMPAs that request a density increase in the Urban Mixed Use District must utilize Transfer of Development Rights credits OR the petition must provide “a reasonably sufficient public benefit.” •Considering the density increase requested, the number of affordable housing units is inadequate. •Data and analysis submitted by the petitioner do not justify approval of this GMPA as submitted. 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 96 Attachment: Mattson at Vanderbilt CCPC Staff Report (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) PL20230001010 12 Staff cannot support the petition as submitted. If the Planning Commission seeks to recommend approval, staff would urge the requirement for additional public benefit to offset the 25.5 DU/A and the reduction in Open Space. LEGAL REVIEW: The County Attorney’s Office reviewed this Staff Report on November 7, 2023. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends denial of the petition as submitted. Staff cannot support the requested density at this location; staff does not support including the usable open space standard in the GMP Subdistrict language; and staff does not support the proposed reduction of usable open space from 60% to 40% in a dense urban rental apartment community. However, IF the Collier County Planning Commission chooses to recommend approval of this GMPA petition, THEN, as an alternative, staff recommends the CCPC consider the following: 1.A reduction in the project density to 16 DU/A based on the subject location and inability to meet development standards and/or, 2.An increase in the public benefit in the form of additional affordable housing for the significant increase in density to a minimum of 30% based upon recent approvals and, 3.Removal of the GMPA subdistrict language related to usable open space (with disapproval of a reduction of usable open space in the companion PUD). Staff acknowledges that maintaining the 60% usable open space requirement may necessitate a density reduction and/or a building height increase. Approving a reduction in usable open space should be offset by the petition providing increased public benefit in the form of additional affordable housing units at 34%. NOTE: This petition has been tentatively scheduled for the BCC meeting on January 23, 2023. 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 97 Attachment: Mattson at Vanderbilt CCPC Staff Report (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) [23-CMP-01166/1822005/1]41 18-CMP-01000 PL20220001010 3375/3333 VBR SSGMPA 4/ 10/16/23_REV Words underlined are additions; Words struck through are deletions. *** *** *** *** are a break in text 1 of 3 ORDINANCE NO. 2023- _______ AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AMENDING ORDINANCE 89-05, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT AND MAP SERIES BY CHANGING THE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF PROPERTY FROM URBAN, MIXED USE DISTRICT, URBAN RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT TO MATTSON AT VANDERBILT RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT, TO ALLOW A MAXIMUM DENSITY OF 150 MULTIFAMILY RENTAL UNITS WITH AFFORDABLE HOUSING, AND FURTHERMORE DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE ADOPTED AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 828 FEET FROM THE INTERSECTION OF VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD AND LIVINGSTON ROAD, IN SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 5.88± ACRES. [PL20220001010] WHEREAS, Collier County, pursuant to Section 163.3161, et. seq., Florida Statutes, the Community Planning Act, formerly the Florida Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, was required to prepare and adopt a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners adopted the Collier County Growth Management Plan on January 10, 1989; and WHEREAS, the Community Planning Act of 2011 provides authority for local governments to amend their respective comprehensive plans and outlines certain procedures to amend adopted comprehensive plans; and WHEREAS, 3333/3375 VBR, LLC, requested an amendment to the Future Land Use Element and Map Series; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Subsection 163.3187(1), Florida Statutes, this amendment is considered a Small-Scale Amendment; and WHEREAS, the Subdistrict property is not located in an area of critical state concern or a rural area of opportunity; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) on ________________, considered the proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan and recommended approval of said amendment to the Board of County Commissioners; and 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 98 Attachment: Attachment A - Ordinance (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) [23-CMP-01166/1822005/1]41 18-CMP-01000 PL20220001010 3375/3333 VBR SSGMPA 4/ 10/16/23_REV Words underlined are additions; Words struck through are deletions. *** *** *** *** are a break in text 2 of 3 WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County did take action in the manner prescribed by law and held public hearings concerning the proposed adoption of the amendment to the Future Land Use Element and Map Series of the Growth Management Plan on __________________ 2023; and WHEREAS, all applicable substantive and procedural requirements of the law have been met. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: SECTION ONE: ADOPTION OF AMENDMENTS TO THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN The amendments to the Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Map and Map Series attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by reference, are hereby adopted in accordance with Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes, and shall be transmitted to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. SECTION TWO: SEVERABILITY. If any phrase or portion of this Ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion. SECTION THREE: EFFECTIVE DATE. The effective date of this plan amendment, if the amendment is not timely challenged, shall be 31 days after the state land planning agency notifies the local government that the plan amendment package is complete. If timely challenged, this amendment shall become effective on the date the state land planning agency or the Administration Commission enters a final order determining this adopted amendment to be in compliance. No development orders, development permits, or land uses dependent on this amendment may be issued or commenced before it has become effective. 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 99 Attachment: Attachment A - Ordinance (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) [23-CMP-01166/1822005/1]41 18-CMP-01000 PL20220001010 3375/3333 VBR SSGMPA 4/ 10/16/23_REV Words underlined are additions; Words struck through are deletions. *** *** *** *** are a break in text 3 of 3 PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida this _____ day of _______________________ 2023. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA __________________________ BY: ______________________________ Deputy Clerk Rick LoCastro, Chairman Approved as to form and legality: ________________________________ Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney Attachment: Exhibit A – Text and Map 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 100 Attachment: Attachment A - Ordinance (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Exhibit A PL20220001010 Page 1 of 5 Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted. 10/12/2023 EXHIBIT A * FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES 140 *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** *** * Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict SECTION II: Amend “II. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY”, Policy 1.5 beginning on page 9 as follows: *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 1.5: The URBAN Future Land Use Designation shall include Future Land Use Districts and Subdistricts for: A. URBAN - MIXED USE DISTRICT 1. Urban Residential Subdistrict 2. Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict 3. Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict 4. Business Park Subdistrict 5. Office and Infill Commercial Subdistrict 6. PUD Neighborhood Village Center Subdistrict 7. Residential Mixed Use Neighborhood Subdistrict 8. Orange Blossom Mixed-Use Subdistrict 9. Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict 10. Henderson Creek Mixed-Use Subdistrict 11. Research and Technology Park Subdistrict 12. Buckley Mixed-Use Subdistrict 13. Commercial Mixed Use Subdistrict 14. Livingston/Radio Road Commercial Infill Subdistrict 15. Vanderbilt Beach Road Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict 16. Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict 17. Hibiscus Residential Infill Subdistrict 18. Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict 19. Mini Triangle Mixed Use Subdistrict 20. Goodlette/Pine Ridge Mixed Use Subdistrict 21. Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard East Residential Subdistrict 22. Meridian Village Mixed-Use Subdistrict 23. Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed Use Subdistrict Map 24. Immokalee Road Interchange Residential Infill Subdistrict 25. Creekside Commerce Park East Mixed Use Subdistrict 26. Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict SECTION III: Amend “I. URBAN DESIGNATION”, beginning on page 26 as follows: *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** *** 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 101 Attachment: Attachment A - Ordinance (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Exhibit A PL20220001010 Page 2 of 5 Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted. 10/12/2023 A. Urban Mixed Use District *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** *** 26. Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict [beginning Page 55] The 5.88-acre subdistrict, as depicted on the Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict map, is located approximately 1,100 feet east of Livingston Road on the north side of Vanderbilt Beach Road. The intent of this subdistrict is to allow for a maximum of 150 multi-family dwelling units to promote affordable and workforce housing in an urban area with transit, employment centers, and public infrastructure. The development of this subdistrict will be governed by the following criteria: a. Development shall be in the form of a PUD. b. The dwelling units are limited to rental units. c. The maximum number of dwelling units permitted within the subdistrict is 150 dwelling units. d. Usable open space shall be 40% of the overall site area. e. Affordable Housing Commitment: 1. Of the total units constructed, the project shall comply with the following: 11.3% of the units will be rented to households whose incomes are up to and including 80% of the Area Median Income (AMI) for Collier County and 11.3% of the units will be rented to households whose incomes are up to and including 100% of the AMI for Collier County and the corresponding rent limits. At time of each SDP, no less than 22.6% of the dwelling units will be identified as affordable and shown on the SDP with the AMI required ranges and fractional numbers will be rounded up to the nearest whole unit. These units will be committed for a period of 30 years from the date of issuance of certificate of occupancy of the first unit. Income and rent limits may be adjusted annually based on combined income and rent limit table published by the Florida Housing Finance Corporation or as otherwise provided by Collier County. 2. As part of the annual PUD monitoring report, the developer will include an annual report that provides the progress and monitoring of occupancy of the income restricted units, including rent data for rented units, in a format approved by Collier County Community and Human Services Division. Developer agrees to annual on-site monitoring by the County. f. The Density Rating System is not applicable to this Subdistrict. SECTION IV: Amend “FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES”, beginning page 159 as follows: 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 102 Attachment: Attachment A - Ordinance (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Exhibit A PL20220001010 Page 3 of 5 Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted. 10/12/2023 *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** *** Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict [page 160] 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 103 Attachment: Attachment A - Ordinance (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Exhibit A PL20220001010 Page 4 of 5 Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted. 10/12/2023 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 104 Attachment: Attachment A - Ordinance (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Exhibit A PL20220001010 Page 5 of 5 Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted. 10/12/2023 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 105 Attachment: Attachment A - Ordinance (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134  239-947-1144  engineering@gradyminor.com  www.gradyminor.com Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict PL20220001010 CCPC Hearing Backup Application and Supporting Documents 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 106 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. Ph. 239-947-1144  Fax. 239-947-0375 3800 Via Del Rey EB 0005151  LB 0005151  LC 26000266 Bonita Springs, FL 34134 www.gradyminor.com March 14, 2023 Amended April 27, 2023 Ms. Katherine Eastley Collier County Growth Management Department Comprehensive Planning Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 RE: Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict (PL20220001010), Submittal 1 Dear Ms. Eastley: Enclosed, please find the application for a proposed small-scale comprehensive plan amendment for a 5.88± acre project located at 3375 and 3333 Vanderbilt Beach Road. The GMPA proposes to modify the FLUE map to add a new subdistrict to allow a multi-family rental development with a maximum of 150 multi-family rental dwelling units. A companion PUD Rezone application (Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD rezone application (PL20220001011) has been filed along with this petition. Documents filed with submittal 1 include the following: 1. Cover letter 2. Expedited Review Certification 3. Application 4. Exhibit I.D Consultants 5. Exhibit IV.B Revised Text 6. Exhibit IV.C Proposed FLU Map 7. Exhibit IV.E Proposed Inset Map 8. Exhibit V.A Land Use 9. Exhibit V.B Existing FLU Map 10. Exhibit V.C Environmental Data 11. Exhibit V.D Growth Management 12. Exhibit V.D1 Market Analysis 13. Exhibit V.E Public Facilities 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 107 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Ms. Katherine Eastley RE: Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict (PL20220001010), Submittal 1 March 14, 2023 Page 2 of 2 14. Exhibit V.E1 Traffic Impact Statement 15. Warranty Deeds 16. Affidavit of Authorization 17. Addressing Checklist 18. Pre-app Notes Please feel free to contact me should you have any questions. Sincerely, D. Wayne Arnold, AICP c: 3333/3375 VBR, LLC Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. GradyMinor File (VBRRZ-22) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 108 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 109 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 1 APPLICATION NUMBER: PL20220001010 DATE RECEIVED: ______________________________ PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE DATE: This application, with all required supplemental data and information, must be completed and accompanied by the appropriate fee, and returned to the Growth Management Department 239-252- 2400, Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104. The application is to be reviewed by staff for sufficiency within 30 calendar days following the filing deadline. The applicant will be notified, in writing, of the sufficiency determination. If insufficient, the applicant will have 30 days to remedy the deficiencies. For additional information on the processing of the application, see Resolution 12-234. If you have any questions, please contact the Comprehensive Planning Section at 239-252-2400. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS I. GENERAL INFORMATION A. Name of Applicant: David J. Stevens Company: 3333/3375 VBR LLC Address: 3838 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 402 City Naples State Florida Zip Code 34103 Phone Number: 239.261.3400 Fax Number: ____________________________ Email Address: David@ipcnaples.com B. Name of Agent* _ D. Wayne Arnold, AICP _ • THIS WILL BE THE PERSON CONTACTED FOR ALL BUSINESS RELATED TO THE PETITION. Company: Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. Address: 3800 Via Del Rey City Bonita Springs State Florida Zip Code 34134 Phone Number: 239-947-1144 Fax Number: ___________________________ Email Address: warnold@gradyminor.com B.1 Name of Agent* _ Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. • THIS WILL BE THE PERSON CONTACTED FOR ALL BUSINESS RELATED TO THE PETITION. Company: Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. Address: 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 City Naples State Florida Zip Code 34103 Phone Number: 239-435-3535 Fax Number: ______________________ Email Address: ryovanovich@cyklawfirm.com C. Name of Owner (s) of Record: 3333/3375 VBR LLC Address: 3838 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 402 City Naples State Florida Zip Code 34103 Phone Number: 239.261.3400 Fax Number: _____________________________ Email Address: David@ipcnaples.com 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 110 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 2 D. Name, Company, Address and Qualifications of all consultants and other professionals providing information contained in this application, as well as Qualifications of the Agent identified above. See Exhibit I.D II. Disclosure of Interest Information: a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: Name and Address % of Ownership N.A. b. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address % of Ownership 3333/3375 VBR LLC, 3838 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 402, Naples FL 34103 David J. Stevens (Chairman, Director, President, Treasurer) - Ownership Interest Clinton L. Sherwood (Director, Vice President, Secretary) - Ownership Interest 100 c. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest: Name and Address % of Ownership N.A. d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners: Name and Address % of Ownership N.A. e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners: Name and Address % of Ownership Roers Acquisitions LLC, Two Carlson Parkway, Suite 400, Plymouth, MN 55447 Brian Roers – 50% owner Kent Roers – 50% owner 100 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 111 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 3 Date of Contract: February 3, 2023 f. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust: Name and Address N.A. g. Date subject property acquired 2022 Leased: Term of lease years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Date of option: December 31, 2023 Date option terminates: N.A. , or Anticipated closing date: N.A. NOTE: Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. III. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: A. PARCEL I.D. NUMBER: 00200240000 and 00202280000 B. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, LESS THE SOUTH 150.00 FEET FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN S. 89°56'12" E., ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 31, FOR A DISTANCE OF 991.18 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 31; THENCE RUN N 02°11'42" W., ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 31, FOR A DISTANCE OF 150.12 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD. A 150 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY AS SHOWN ON FDOT RIGHT-OF-WAY MAP SECTION 03512-2601, DATED 11-21-78, SAID POINT LYING 150.00 FEET NORTH OF, AS MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 31 AND ALSO BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL OF LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE CONTINUE N. 02°11'42" W., ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 31, FOR A DISTANCE OF 517.35 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 31; THENCE RUN S. 89°56'42' 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 112 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 4 E., ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 31, FOR A DISTANCE OF 330.09 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 31. THENCE RUN S. 02°13'16" E. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 31, FOR A DISTANCE OF 517.41 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH RIGHT- OF-WAY LINE OF SAID VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD; THENCE RUN N. 89°56'12" W. PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 31 AND ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT- OF-WAY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 330.33 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. AND THE EAST 1/2 OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4, LESS THE SOUTH 150 FEET OF SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA CONTAINING 5.88 ACRES, MORE OR LESS C. GENERAL LOCATION: North side of Vanderbilt Beach Road approximately 0.75 miles east of Livingston Road. D. Section: 31 Township: 48 Range: 26 E. PLANNING COMMUNITY: Urban Estates F. TAZ: 2335 G. SIZE IN ACRES: 5.88± H. ZONING: A, Agricultural I. FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION(S): Urban Designation, Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict J. SURROUNDING LAND USE PATTERN: Residential, golf course and assisted living – Exhibit V.A and V.B IV. TYPE OF REQUEST: A. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN ELEMENT (S) TO BE AMENDED: ______ Housing Element ______ Recreation/Open Space ______ Traffic Circulation Sub-Element ______ Mass Transit Sub-Element ______ Aviation Sub-Element ______ Potable Water Sub-Element ______ Sanitary Sewer Sub-Element ______ NGWAR Sub-Element ______ Solid Waste Sub-Element ______ Drainage Sub-Element ______ Capital Improvement Element ______ CCME Element X Future Land Use Element ______ Golden Gate Master Plan ______ Immokalee Master Plan 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 113 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 5 B. AMEND PAGE (S): v, 9, 55 and 160 OF THE: Future Land Use Element AS FOLLOWS: (Use Strike- through to identify language to be deleted; Use Underline to identify language to be added). Attach additional pages if necessary: See Exhibit IV.B C. AMEND FUTURE LAND USE MAP(S) DESIGNATION FROM Urban Designation, Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict TO Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict – See Exhibit IV.C D. AMEND OTHER MAP(S) AND EXHIBITS AS FOLLOWS: (Name & Page #) N.A. E. DESCRIBE ADDITIONAL CHANGES REQUESTED: Create new subdistrict map – Exhibit IV.E V. REQUIRED INFORMATION: NOTE: ALL AERIALS MUST BE AT A SCALE OF NO SMALLER THAN I” = 400’. At least one copy reduced to 8- 1/2 x 11 shall be provided of all aerials and/or maps. A. LAND USE Exhibit V.A Provide general location map showing surrounding developments (PUD, DRI’s, existing zoning) with subject property outlined. Exhibit V.A Provide most recent aerial of site showing subject boundaries, source, and date. Exhibit V.A Provide a map and summary table of existing land use and zoning within a radius of 300 feet from boundaries of subject property. B. FUTURE LAND USE AND DESIGNATION Exhibit V.B Provide map of existing Future Land Use Designation(s) of subject property and adjacent lands, with acreage totals for each land use designation on the subject property. C. ENVIRONMENTAL Exhibit V.C Provide most recent aerial and summary table of acreage of native habitats and soils occurring on site. HABITAT IDENTIFICATION MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH THE FDOT-FLORIDA LAND USE, COVER AND FORMS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (FLUCCS CODE). NOTE: THIS MAY BE INDICATED ON SAME AERIAL AS THE LAND USE AERIAL IN “A” ABOVE. Exhibit V.C Provide a summary table of Federal (US Fish & Wildlife Service) and State (Florida Game & Freshwater Fish Commission) listed plant and animal species known to occur on the site and/or known to inhabit biological communities similar to the site (e.g. panther or black bear range, avian rookery, bird migratory route, etc.) Identify historic and/or archaeological sites on the subject property. D. GROWTH MANAGEMENT Reference , F.A.C. and Collier County’s Capital Improvements Element Policy 1.1.2 (Copies attached). 1. INSERT “Y” FOR YES OR “N” FOR NO IN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING: N Is the proposed amendment located in an Area of Critical State Concern? (Reference , F.A.C.). IF so, identify area 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 114 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 6 located in ACSC. N Is the proposed amendment directly related to a proposed Development of Regional Impact pursuant to Chapter 380 F.S.? (Reference , F.A.C.) Y/N – Exhibit V.D Is the proposed amendment directly related to a proposed Small Scale Development Activity pursuant to Subsection 163.3187 (1)(c), F.S.? Does the proposed amendment create a significant impact in population which is defined as a potential increase in County-wide population by more than 5% of population projections? (Reference Capital Improvement Element Policy 1.1.2). If yes, indicate mitigation measures being proposed in conjunction with the proposed amendment. Y/Y – Exhibit V.D1 Does the proposed land use cause an increase in density and/or intensity to the uses permitted in a specific land use designation and district identified (commercial, industrial, etc.) or is the proposed land use a new land use designation or district? (Reference F.A.C.). If so, provide data and analysis to support the suitability of land for the proposed use, and of environmentally sensitive land, ground water and natural resources. (Reference , F.A.C.) E. PUBLIC FACILITIES 1. Provide the existing Level of Service Standard (LOS) and document the impact the proposed change will have on the following public facilities: Exhibit V.E Potable Water Exhibit V.E Sanitary Sewer Exhibit V.E1 Arterial & Collector Roads; Name specific road and LOS - Vanderbilt Beach Road Exhibit V.E Drainage Exhibit V.E Solid Waste Exhibit V.E Parks: Community and Regional If the proposed amendment involves an increase in residential density, or an increase in intensity for commercial and/or industrial development that would cause the LOS for public facilities to fall below the adopted LOS, indicate mitigation measures being proposed in conjunction with the proposed amendment. (Reference Capital Improvement Element Objective 1 and Policies) 2. Exhibit V.E Provide a map showing the location of existing services and public facilities that will serve the subject property (i.e. water, sewer, fire protection, police protection, schools and emergency medical services. 3. Exhibit V.E Document proposed services and public facilities, identify provider, and describe the effect the proposed change will have on schools, fire protection and emergency medical services. F. OTHER Identify the following areas relating to the subject property: 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 115 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 7 Zoned AH – 10’, X and X500 Flood zone based on Flood Insurance Rate Map data (FIRM). N.A. Location of wellfields and cones of influence, if applicable. (Identified on Collier County Zoning Maps) N.A. Coastal High Hazard Area, if applicable N.A. High Noise Contours (65 LDN or higher) surrounding the Naples Airport, if applicable (identified on Collier County Zoning Maps). G. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION $16,700.00 non-refundable filing fee made payable to the Board of County Commissioners due at time of submittal. (Plus, proportionate share of advertising costs) Provided $9,000.00 non-refundable filing fee for a Small-Scale Amendment made payable to the Board of County Commissioners due at time of submittal. (Plus, proportionate share of advertising costs) Provided Proof of ownership (copy of deed) Provided Notarized Letter of Authorization if Agent is not the Owner (See attached form) Provided Addressing Checklist Provided Preapplication Meeting Notes * If you have held a pre-application meeting within 9 months prior to submitted date and paid the pre-application fee of $500.00 at the meeting, deduct that amount from the above application fee amount when submitting your application. All pre-application fees are included in the total application submittal fee if petition submitted within 9 months of pre-application meeting date. Otherwise the overage will be applied to future proportionate share advertising costs. * Maps shall include: North arrow, name and location of principal roadways and shall be at a scale of 1”=400’ or at a scale as determined during the pre-application meeting. *All attachments should be consistently referenced as attachments or exhibits, and should be labelled to correlate to the application form, e.g. “Exhibit I.D.” * Planning Community, TAZ map, Traffic Analysis Zone map, Zoning maps, and Future Land Use Maps. Some maps are available on the Zoning Division website depicting information herein: Zoning Services Section: _________________ Comprehensive Planning Section: _______________________ THIS HAS CHANGED SINCE DCA BECAME DEO. SEE GMP PAGE 2011 UPDATES: https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/your-government/divisions-s-z/zoning-division/zoning-services- section/land-use-commission-district-maps 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 116 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) May 4, 2023 Page 1 of 1 Exhibit ID Consultants-r1.docx Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134  239-947-1144  engineering@gradyminor.com  www.gradyminor.com Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict (PL20220001010) Exhibit I.D Professional Consultants Planner/Project Management: D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, FL 34134 239.947.1144 warnold@gradyminor.com Land Use Attorney: Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq Coleman, Yovanovich and Koester, P.A. 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 Naples, FL 34103 239.435.3535 ryovanovich@cyklawfirm.com Environmental Consultant: Marco Espinar, Biologist Collier Environmental Consultants, Inc. 3211 68th Street SW Naples, FL 34105 239-263-2687 marcoe@prodigy.net Traffic Engineer: James M. Banks, P.E., President JMB Transportation Engineering, Inc. 4711 7th Avenue SW Naples, FL 34119 239.919.2767 jmbswte@msn.com 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 117 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Andorra CT Villa ge Walk CIR Vanderbilt Beach RD Bermuda Isle CIRSandalwood CIRSource: Esri, Maxar, Earthstar Geographics, and the GIS User Community Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict Exhibit IV.C - Proposed Future Land Use Designation Urban Designation, Mixed Use District, Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict . 230 0 230115 Feet Legend Subject Property - 5.88+/- Acres Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict Vanderbilt Beach Rd Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict Urban Residential Subdistrict 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 118 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Livingston RDVillage Walk CIR Vanderbilt Beach RD Cerrito CT Benicia CT Andorra CT Donoso CTMarsala WAYWilshire Lakes BLVDBermuda Isle CIRVia Palma Fieldstone BLVD Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict Exhibit IV.E - Proposed New Inset Map . 570 0 570285 Feet Legend Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 119 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) ZONED: VINEYARDS DRI/PUD USE: RESIDENTIAL ZONED: THE VANDERBILT TRUST CFPUDUSE: ASSISTED LIVING FACILITYZONED: BRADFORD SQUARE MPUDUSE: ASSISTED LIVING FACILITYZONED: PELICAN MARSH DRI/PUD USE: GOLF COURSE, RESIDENTIAL VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD SUBJECT PROPERTY - 5.88± ACRES EXISTING FLUE: URBAN DESIGNATION, MIXED USE DISTRICT, URBAN RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT EXISTING ZONING: A, AGRICULTURAL ADJ. PROPERTY ZONING LAND USE NORTH PELICAN MARSH DRI/PUD GOLF COURSE, RESIDENTIAL EAST THE VANDERBILT TRUST CFPUD ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY SOUTH VINEYARDS DRI/PUD ROW AND RESIDENTIAL WEST BRADFORD SQUARE MPUD ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY 0 300'150'SCALE: 1" = 300' GradyMinor Civil Engineers ●Land Surveyors ●Planners ●Landscape Architects Cert. of Auth. EB 0005151 Cert. of Auth. LB 0005151 Business LC 26000266 Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 Bonita Springs: 239.947.1144 ZZZ.GradyMinor.coP Fort Myers: 239.690.4380 WHEN PLOTTED @ 8.5" X 11" 300 FOOT RADIUS SUBJECT PROPERTY 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 120 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Andorra CT Villa ge Walk CIR Vanderbilt Beach RD Bermuda Isle CIRSandalwood CIRSource: Esri, Maxar, Earthstar Geographics, and the GIS User Community Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict Exhibit V.B - Existing Future Land Use Designation Urban Designation, Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict . 230 0 230115 Feet Legend Subject Property - 5.88+/- Acres Vanderbilt Beach Rd Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict Urban Residential Subdistrict 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 121 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 122 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 123 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 124 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 125 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 126 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 127 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 128 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 129 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 130 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 131 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 132 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 133 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 134 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 135 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 136 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 137 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 138 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 139 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.cPacket Pg. 140Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at 9.A.1.cPacket Pg. 141Attachment: Attachments B - 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 142 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.cPacket Pg. 143 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 144 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 145 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 146 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 147 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.cPacket Pg. 148 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 149 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.cPacket Pg. 150Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at 9.A.1.cPacket Pg. 151Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at 9.A.1.cPacket Pg. 152Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at 9.A.1.cPacket Pg. 153Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 154 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 155 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 156 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 157 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 158 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 159 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 160 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 161 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 162 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 163 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 164 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 165 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 166 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.cPacket Pg. 167Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at 9.A.1.cPacket Pg. 168Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at 9.A.1.cPacket Pg. 169Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at 9.A.1.cPacket Pg. 170Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at 9.A.1.cPacket Pg. 171Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict (PL20220001010) Exhibit V.D Growth Management June 7, 2023 Page 1 of 4 Exhibit VD Growth Management-r1.docx Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134  239-947-1144  engineering@gradyminor.com  www.gradyminor.com The small-scale growth management plan amendment proposes to establish a new infill subdistrict which would permit up to 150 multi-family rental dwelling units on the 5.88+/- acre property. The applicant has committed that 11.3% of the dwelling units constructed will be income restricted and rented to individuals or families earning less than 80% of the Collier County AMI and 11.3% of the dwelling units constructed will be income restricted and rented to individuals or families earning less than 100% of the Collier County AMI. The small-scale amendment is necessary in order to develop the property at a density that provides an economic incentive to the developer to provide 22.6% of the units constructed as affordable rental units. Under, Chapter 163 of the Florida Statutes, local governments may adopt small-scale amendments to their Growth Management Plans if the amendment impacts fewer than 50 acres. The proposed new sub-district consists of approximately 5.88+/- acres and is; therefore, eligible to seek the proposed small-scale amendment. A companion PUD rezoning application has been filed with Collier County. Chapter 163.3167 Scope of act.— (9) Each local government shall address in its comprehensive plan, as enumerated in this chapter, the water supply sources necessary to meet and achieve the existing and projected water use demand for the established planning period, considering the applicable plan developed pursuant to s. 373.709. The project will be provided potable water and sewer service by Collier County Water Sewer District. No capacity issues exist or are anticipated in the service area. Chapter 163.3177 (6) (a) 2. The future land use plan and plan amendments shall be based upon surveys, studies, and data regarding the area, as applicable, including: a. The amount of land required to accommodate anticipated growth. b. The projected permanent and seasonal population of the area. c. The character of undeveloped land. d. The availability of water supplies, public facilities, and services. e. The need for redevelopment, including the renewal of blighted areas and the elimination of nonconforming uses which are inconsistent with the character of the community. f. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to or closely proximate to military installations. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 172 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) June 7, 2023 Page 2 of 4 Exhibit VD Growth Management-r1.docx g. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to an airport as defined in s. 330.35 and consistent with s. 333.02. h. The discouragement of urban sprawl. i. The need for job creation, capital investment, and economic development that will strengthen and diversify the community’s economy. j. The need to modify land uses and development patterns within antiquated subdivisions. Chapter 163.3177 8. Future land use map amendments shall be based upon the following analyses: a. An analysis of the availability of facilities and services. b. An analysis of the suitability of the plan amendment for its proposed use considering the character of the undeveloped land, soils, topography, natural resources, and historic resources on site. c. An analysis of the minimum amount of land needed to achieve the goals and requirements of this section. The Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict is consistent with Chapter 163.3177, F.S. The subdistrict includes all available land of a size adequate to support a residential project. 163.3184 Process for adoption of comprehensive plan or plan amendment. The proposed amendment is consistent with Chapter 163.3184, F.S which establishes the criteria for small-scale comprehensive plan amendments to a growth management plan. 163.3187 Process for adoption of small scale comprehensive plan amendment.— (1) A small scale development amendment may be adopted under the following conditions: (a) The proposed amendment involves a use of 50 acres or fewer and: (b) The proposed amendment does not involve a text change to the goals, policies, and objectives of the local government’s comprehensive plan, but only proposes a land use change to the future land use map for a site-specific small scale development activity. However, text changes that relate directly to, and are adopted simultaneously with, the small scale future land use map amendment shall be permissible under this section. (c) The property that is the subject of the proposed amendment is not located within an area of critical state concern, unless the project subject to the proposed amendment involves the construction of affordable housing units meeting the criteria of s. 420.0004(3), and is located within an area of critical state concern designated by s. 380.0552 or by the Administration Commission pursuant to s. 380.05(1). The proposed amendment involves the use of less than 50 acres, the proposed amendment includes a map amendment and associated text relating directly to the map amendment, and the property is not located within an area of critical state concern. No State or regional impacts are associated with the proposed amendment. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 173 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) June 7, 2023 Page 3 of 4 Exhibit VD Growth Management-r1.docx Project Justification Future Land Use Element: The 5.88± acre project is designated Urban Designation, Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict on the Future Land Use Map. The small-scale growth management plan amendment proposes to establish a new infill subdistrict which would permit up to 150 multi-family rental dwelling units on the 5.88+/- acre property. The applicant has committed that 11.3% of the dwelling units constructed will be income restricted and rented to individuals or families earning less than 80% of the Collier County AMI and 11.3% of the dwelling units constructed will be income restricted and rented to individuals or families earning less than 100% of the Collier County AMI. The small-scale amendment is necessary in order to develop the property at a density that provides an economic incentive to the developer to provide 30% of the units constructed as affordable rental units. Both Collier County and the Urban Land Institute have conducted analyses of the demand for additional affordable housing in Collier County. The studies have concluded that additional housing meeting affordable housing guidelines are needed in Collier County. Policy 5.9: Encourage recognition of identifiable communities within the urbanized area of western Collier County. Presentation of economic and demographic data shall be based on Planning Communities and commonly recognized neighborhoods. Transportation Element: Policy 5.1 requires that all projects are evaluated to determine their effect on the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR. The TIS prepared in support of this small-scale amendment application concludes that no level of service issues will arise from development of the proposed 150 rental units. Public Facilities Element: The property is served by potable water and sanitary sewer services. Water and sewer service will be provided by Collier County Water Sewer District. No capacity issues have been identified or are anticipated in the future. Conservation and Coastal Management Element: Policy 6.1.2 requires that developments in the Urban area must retain a minimum of 25% of existing native vegetation on-site. The site has been largely cleared in support of the former 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 174 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) June 7, 2023 Page 4 of 4 Exhibit VD Growth Management-r1.docx equestrian training facility and existing animal hospital and only scattered native trees remain on-site. Some tree clusters exist and 25% of the trees to be retained will be identified as part of the companion PUD application. Objective 6.2 and implementing policies protect and conserve wetlands and natural functions of wetlands. The vegetative mapping provided in the Environmental Assessment identifies no wetlands on the site. Objective 7.1: Direct incompatible land uses away from listed animal species and their habitats. The availability of suitable habitat for any vertebrate is quite limited. The parcel is cleared and does not provide potential for any denning, habitation and /or foraging. The parcel is also surrounded by development. The parcel was traversed and examined. Potential species for such a small parcel would be fox squirrels and/or gopher tortoises. At the time of inspection, no burrows and/or small animals were encountered. The project site does provide some foraging for traversing birds. A Black Bear management plan may be required at the time of SDP. Please also refer to the listed species management and indigenous preservation plans prepared by Collier Environmental Consultants, Inc. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 175 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict (PL20220001010) July 20, 2023 Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134  239-947-1144  engineering@gradyminor.com  www.gradyminor.com Exhibit V.D1 Needs Analysis and Market Study Summary of Market Rates: 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 176 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 177 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 178 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 179 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 180 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 181 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 182 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 183 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 184 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 185 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 186 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 187 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 188 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 189 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 190 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 191 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 192 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 193 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 194 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 195 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 196 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 197 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 198 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 199 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 200 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 201 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 202 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 203 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 204 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 205 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 206 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 207 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 208 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 209 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 210 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 211 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 212 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 213 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 214 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 215 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 216 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 217 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 218 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 219 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 220 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 221 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 222 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 223 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 224 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 225 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 2021-2025 Prepared By: Blulynx Solutions 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 226 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 1 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Table of Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 4 ES-05 Executive Summary - 24 CFR 91.200(c), 91.220(b) ......................................................................... 4 The Process ................................................................................................................................................. 15 PR-05 Lead & Responsible Agencies 24 CFR 91.200(b) ........................................................................... 15 PR-10 Consultation – 91.100, 91.110, 91.200(b), 91.300(b), 91.215(I) and 91.315(I) ............................ 17 PR-15 Citizen Participation – 91.105, 91.115, 91.200(c) and 91.300(c) ................................................. 33 Needs Assessment ...................................................................................................................................... 42 NA-05 Overview ...................................................................................................................................... 42 NA-10 Housing Needs Assessment - 24 CFR 91.205 (a,b,c) .................................................................... 42 NA-15 Disproportionately Greater Need: Housing Problems – 91.205 (b)(2) ........................................ 54 NA-20 Disproportionately Greater Need: Severe Housing Problems – 91.205 (b)(2) ............................ 59 NA-25 Disproportionately Greater Need: Housing Cost Burdens – 91.205 (b)(2) .................................. 64 NA-30 Disproportionately Greater Need: Discussion – 91.205(b)(2) ..................................................... 66 NA-35 Public Housing – 91.205(b) .......................................................................................................... 69 NA-40 Homeless Needs Assessment – 91.205(c)Introduction: .............................................................. 75 A variety of housing and shelter models are available within the community including emergency shelter (ES), transitional housing (TH), permanent supportive housing (PSH), rapid re-housing (RRH).: ................................................................................................................................................................ 75 NA-45 Non-Homeless Special Needs Assessment - 91.205 (b, d) ........................................................... 78 NA-50 Non-Housing Community Development Needs – 91.215 (f) ....................................................... 80 Housing Market Analysis ............................................................................................................................. 82 MA-05 Overview ..................................................................................................................................... 82 MA-10 Number of Housing Units – 91.210(a)&(b)(2) ............................................................................. 82 MA-15 Housing Market Analysis: Cost of Housing - 91.210(a) ............................................................... 85 MA-20 Housing Market Analysis: Condition of Housing – 91.210(a)...................................................... 88 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 227 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 2 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) MA-25 Public and Assisted Housing – 91.210(b) .................................................................................... 92 MA-30 Homeless Facilities and Services – 91.210(c) .............................................................................. 95 MA-35 Special Needs Facilities and Services – 91.210(d) ....................................................................... 97 MA-40 Barriers to Affordable Housing – 91.210(e) .............................................................................. 100 MA-45 Non-Housing Community Development Assets – 91.215 (f) .................................................... 102 MA-50 Needs and Market Analysis Discussion ..................................................................................... 108 MA-60 Broadband Needs of Housing occupied by Low- and Moderate-Income Households - 91.210(a)(4), 91.310(a)(2) ..................................................................................................................... 113 MA-65 Hazard Mitigation - 91.210(a)(5), 91.310(a)(3) ......................................................................... 115 Strategic Plan ............................................................................................................................................ 116 SP-05 Overview ..................................................................................................................................... 116 SP-10 Geographic Priorities – 91.215 (a)(1) .......................................................................................... 119 SP-25 Priority Needs - 91.215(a)(2)....................................................................................................... 122 SP-30 Influence of Market Conditions – 91.215 (b) .............................................................................. 130 SP-35 Anticipated Resources - 91.215(a)(4), 91.220(c)(1,2) ................................................................. 131 SP-40 Institutional Delivery Structure – 91.215(k) ............................................................................... 135 SP-45 Goals Summary – 91.215(a)(4) ................................................................................................... 141 SP-50 Public Housing Accessibility and Involvement – 91.215(c) ......................................................... 145 SP-55 Barriers to affordable housing – 91.215(h) ................................................................................. 145 SP-60 Homelessness Strategy – 91.215(d) ............................................................................................ 146 SP-65 Lead based paint Hazards – 91.215(i)y ....................................................................................... 148 SP-70 Anti-Poverty Strategy – 91.215(j) ............................................................................................... 149 SP-80 Monitoring – 91.230 ................................................................................................................... 149 Expected Resources .................................................................................................................................. 151 AP-15 Expected Resources – 91.220(c)(1,2) ......................................................................................... 151 Annual Goals and Objectives ..................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 228 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 3 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) AP-20 Annual Goals and Objectives ...................................................................................................... 155 Projects ................................................................................................................................................. 158 AP-35 Projects – 91.220(d) ................................................................................................................... 158 AP-38 Project Summary ........................................................................................................................ 161 AP-50 Geographic Distribution – 91.220(f) ........................................................................................... 171 Affordable Housing ............................................................................................................................... 172 AP-55 Affordable Housing – 91.220(g) ................................................................................................. 172 AP-60 Public Housing – 91.220(h) ......................................................................................................... 173 AP-65 Homeless and Other Special Needs Activities – 91.220(i) .......................................................... 175 AP-75 Barriers to affordable housing – 91.220(j) ................................................................................. 177 AP-85 Other Actions – 91.220(k) .......................................................................................................... 177 Program Specific Requirements ............................................................................................................ 181 AP-90 Program Specific Requirements – 91.220(l)(1,2,4) .................................................................... 181 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 229 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 4 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Executive Summary ES-05 Executive Summary - 24 CFR 91.200(c), 91.220(b) 1. Introduction The 2021-2025 Consolidated Plan for Housing and Community Development provides the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) with information on Collier County’s intended uses of funds HUD's Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME), and Emergency Solutions Grants (ESG) programs. The County allocates the annual funding from these programs to public, private, or non-profit parties consistent with HUD program goals and requirements. Below is a list of each of the grant program objectives:  CDBG Program: Provide decent housing, creating suitable living environments, and expanding economic opportunities principally for low- and moderate-income persons.  HOME Program: Provides funding for a wide range of activities including building, buying, and/or rehabilitating affordable housing for rent or homeownership or providing direct rental assistance to low-income people.  ESG Program: ESG funds improve the number and quality of emergency shelters for homeless individuals and families, help operate shelters, provide essential services to shelter residents, rapidly rehouse homeless individuals and families, and prevent families and individuals from becoming homeless. The County submits the Consolidated Plan to HUD every five years and has a program year beginning October 1 and ending September 30. The County’s Annual Action provide a concise summary of the actions, activities, and specific federal and nonfederal resources that will be used each year to address the priority needs and goals identified in the Consolidated Plan. The County has identified the following Goals to be addressed over the 2021-2025 Consolidated Plan period and during the 2021 Annual Action Plan: Goal # Goal Name 1 Housing Affordability 2 Homelessness & Homelessness Prevention 3 Public Facilities 4 Public Infrastructure Improvements 5 Public Services 6 Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Choice 7 Program Administration and Planning 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 230 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 5 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Community Profile and Needs The Collier County Consolidated Plan relies upon multiple forms of qualitative and quantitative data as well as community input in order to identify housing, homelessness, and community development needs and trends. This picture of need is the basis of the proposed objectives and outcomes for the 2021 Consolidated Plan. In addition to the US Census, updated American Community Survey (ACS) data and community surveys that provides the foundation for development of the document, the Cities of Naples, Everglades, and Marco Island built on the work of several active committees and recent studies that addressed housing, homeless and community development. The assessment was also informed by additional consultations with city officials and other important stakeholders such as the Affordable Housing Advisory Committee, United Way of Collier County, and the Collier County Homeless Coalition. In 2020, the County’s economy has continued to diversify and improve, while at the same time leaving many in the community still struggling to find jobs with wages to cover increasing housing costs. There is a significant number of households who cannot meet the basic needs for food, shelter, medical care, and transportation. In addition, there are a growing number of seniors, persons with disabilities, and others who are unable to work. These factors, combined with a very tight housing market, have resulted in many households paying more than they can afford, and a growing number of persons experiencing homelessness. It is important to note that the impacts of the COVID-19 are too recent to be reflected in the 2020 and 2019 ACS data used for the analysis provided below. Population Growth As noted in the 2019 Census American Community Survey, Collier County, Florida had a total population of 384,902 of which 195,189 or 50.7% are female and 189,713 or 49.2% are males when compared to 2010, County’s population was 322,472 with 162,493 or 50.3% of females and 159,979 or 49.6% of males. Therefore, reflecting a 19.3% population increase in the Collier County. Population grew to 21,812 in Naples, 7.32% increase since 2010. The population also increased in Marco Island to 17,834, a 5.14% increase since 2010. Last, Everglades City’s population decreased to 190, a 41.89% decrease since 2010. Accounting for population growth over the last 10 years, Collier County is expected to continue to grow over time. Age Distribution The population of Collier County is aging. According to ACS, in 2010 there were 70,289 people aged 60 to 75 and this grew to 87,042 in 2019. For the same period, there were 193,930 people under the age of 55 in 2010, which has also risen to 205,929 in 2019. Racial and Ethnic Composition Collier County is becoming increasingly racially and ethnically diverse. Latino residents are the fastest growing population, representing 28.6% of the population in the County in 2019. While 11.5% of the population is non-white comprised of 28,704 African Americans, 6,961 Asians, 1,768 American Indian and Alaska Natives, and 6,414 multi-racial persons. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 231 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 6 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Household Composition As of 2019, Collier County has a total of 140,578 households. There were 10,797 households in Naples, 8,379 in Marco Island, and 101 in Everglades City. In Collier County, of the 140,578 total household there were 10,194 single female-headed households and 4,417 single male-headed households. There has also been a significant increase in nonfamily households 43,299 which now make up 30.8% of all households as compared to 2010 which had 37,996 or 32.12%. The largest growth in household type is non-family households which increased 13.95% between 2010 and 2019. In 2019, the average household size is 2.71 in Collier County. Multigenerational living is defined as residing in a home with three or more generations. According to Generations United, the past ten years have seen a remarkably large leap in multigenerational living, from 7% of Americans 2011 to 26% of Americans in 2021. As noted in the 2010 Census, Collier County had a total of 118,258 households of which 2.6% (3,022)% were living in multigenerational households. This data is collected during the decennial census every ten years and this data is the most recent data available. MULTIGENERATIONAL HOUSEHOLDS Label Estimate Percent Multigenerational Households 3,022 2.6% Other Households 115,236 97.4% TOTAL 118,258 100% Source: 2010 American Community Survey, 2010: ACS 1-Year Estimates Detailed Tables Income and Poverty According to 2019 ACS, the median income of households in Collier County, Florida was $76,025. An estimated 4.8% of households had income below $10,000 a year and 13.1% had income over $200,000 or more. The Median Household Income for Collier County is higher than the US ($65,712) and our northern county, Lee County ($57,832). While income has risen slightly there remain many low wage jobs and data has shown this contributes to financial instability as evidenced by other indicators: 6.5% or 9,164 residents receive food stamp benefits (SNAP), 61% of students are eligible for free and reduced lunch. In 2019, 48,825 individuals in Collier County had incomes below 125 % of the poverty levels as indicated in the chart below. % 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 232 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 7 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Source: https://dch.georgia.gov/document/document/2019-federal-poverty-guidelines/download 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 233 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 8 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Persons with Disabilities According to the 2019 ACS, of the total Collier County population of 384,902 there were 47,569 people, or 12.3%, living with one or more disabilities. The highest reported disabilities include ambulatory at 6.3%, cognitive at 3.9%, and difficulty with independent living 5.2%. Persons Experiencing Homelessness The 2021 Point-in-Time Count (PIT) identified 568 people in Collier County experiencing homelessness, a 5.8% decrease from 2020. Over 25% of this population, or 144 individuals, met HUD’s definition of unsheltered. As a disclaimer, these numbers may be under reported due to COVID. The 2021 PIT count also found that 169 persons experiencing homelessness were seriously mentally ill, 198 reported substance abuse, 34 were veterans, 49 were seniors, and 49 were families with comprised of adults and 109 children. For FY 2021, Collier County reported that 568 unduplicated individuals who were homeless received human services from one or more agencies. During the 2020-2021 school year, the Collier County public school reported 805 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 234 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 9 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) homeless youth, includes students who are staying with friends or family. The reported number includes 183 homeless youth (16 and older) who were unaccompanied. Persons with Special Needs who are not Homeless. Limited new data exists specific to non-homeless special needs populations in Collier County. There are numerous sub-populations in this community. Of those, there are some that have both enough and unique housing and service needs that warrant identification. Those include the following: families with children, seniors, ex-offenders, people with HIV/AIDS, victims of domestic violence, people with drug and alcohol addictions, people who are evicted or foreclosed, people with physical and mental disabilities, veterans, youth and young adults, and youth aging out of foster care. Employment and Economy Economic conditions in Collier County have recovered significantly in the past decade, and the County has emerged as a more diversified economy than it was before the Great Recession. The number of jobs has grown steadily during the decade, and unemployment rates have remained relatively low during recent years (below 3%). Wages have slightly risen 1.9% in the County as reflected in the household earnings chart below: Household Earnings 2017-2019 Collier County, Florida 2017 2018 2019 $40,622.00 $40,892.00 $41,415.00 Source: Census, ACS Estimates 2017-2019, data.census.gov As of 2019, there were 166,353 (50.7%) persons in the labor force 16 years and older and 161,557 (49.3%) not in the labor force. According to 2019 ACS estimates, 4,929 or 1.5% of the total population was unemployed. While there have been recent and significant job losses as a result of COVID-19, it is unclear how sustained these job losses will be as social distancing measures diminish. It is apparent however that many people with limited incomes are experiencing financial instability as a result of recent events. Housing Units and Tenure According to 2019 ACS estimates, the County had a total of 222,289 housing units. The majority of the housing units are single family 1-unit detached unit structures at 90,552 (40.7%) of the total units. The remainder consisting of 1-unit, attached at 15,145 (6.8%), 2-9 multi-family units at 44,174 (20.1%), 10-20 multi-family units at 59,697 (26.9%) and a small share of mobile/manufactured homes at 12,499 (5.6%) of the housing units. Housing Cost Burden 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 235 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 10 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) While wages and incomes have continued to rise in recent years, they have not kept pace with the cost of both owner and rental housing in Collier County. From 2010 to 2019, Median Household Income increased 44% from 2010 at $52,730 to 2019 at $76,025. Housing costs in the county area have risen more sharply since 2010, especially in recent years. According to 2019 ACS estimates, the County’s median home prices have increased by 44.8% between 2010 and 2019, reaching $370,000. The County’s median gross rental rates have also increased substantially faster than incomes and the home values. Between 2010 and 2019, the median rental rate rose to 48.3% from $942 in 2010 to $1,397 in 2019. As a result, many households pay more for housing than is affordable, or are unable to afford any housing. Households paying more than 30% of household income are considered to have a ‘housing cost burden’. According to 2019 ACS, a total of 19,977 of renters in Collier County have cost burdens greater than 30% of their income, while a total of 14,910 of homeowners have cost burdens greater than 30% but less than 50% of their income. HUD Comprehensive Housing Affordable Strategy (CHAS) (2011-2015) data estimates the County had a total of 13,977 renter households and 14,154 of owner households spent more than 30% of their income on housing costs. Housing Conditions and Lead Based Paint The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Report on the National Survey of Lead-Based Paint in Housing released in 1995 found that 83% of the nation’s privately owned housing units built before 1980 had lead-based paint somewhere in the building. The study suggests that older homes are more likely to have lead-based paint than newer homes. According to the 2019 ACS, approximately 17% (37,852) of the total housing units were built prior to 1980 may be at risk of containing lead-based paint. Lead-based paint numbers are estimated since census data is not broken out annually. Since lead-based paint was outlawed in 1978 and census data is not available annually, all housing built after 1980 was excluded from the potential pool of housing potentially contaminated with lead-based paint. Despite the age of the housing stock, the physical condition of the housing in Collier County is generally good, as there are relatively few housing units (1,715) in the area that are considered substandard according to HUD. Based on input received during provider and public consultations, units available to low-income residents tend to have more significant issues, and because of the scarcity of affordable low-income housing, residents are reluctant to raise their concerns for fear of losing the housing. 2. Summary of the objectives and outcomes identified in the Plan Needs Assessment Overview During the development of the Consolidated Plan, seven priority needs were identified. The priority needs and associated goals for 2021-2025 are summarized below: 1. Housing Affordability • New Construction, Rehabilitation, or Acquisition of Housing for Homeownership • New Construction, Rehabilitation, or Acquisition of Housing for Rental Housing 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 236 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 11 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) • Homebuyer Assistance • CHDO Set-Aside • Tenant Based Rental Assistance 2. Homelessness & Homelessness Prevention • Support Emergency Housing and Services for the Homeless • HMIS Support • Provide Rapid Re-Housing and Homelessness Prevention 3. Public Facilities • Improve Public Facilities • Improve Other Facilities 4. Public Infrastructure Improvements • Public Infrastructure Improvements 5. Public Services • Provide Public Service 6. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Choice • Provide assistance and education to homebuyers. 7. Program Administration and Planning • Program Administration 3. Evaluation of past performance Each year, Collier County reports its progress in meeting the five-year and annual goals in the Consolidated Annual Performance Evaluation Report (CAPER). Listed below are some of the goals and accomplishments in the County’s Fiscal Year (FY) 2019 CAPER. The County successfully utilized CDBG, HOME, and ESG funds by increasing housing assistance for low- and moderate-income persons and allocating funds to public infrastructure and facility improvements, public services to local non-profit organizations to provide essential social services for the homeless, LMI persons, and non-homeless special needs population, affordable housing initiative and at-risk of homelessness activities. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 237 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 12 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) For FY2020, the fourth year of the Consolidated Plan period, Collier County made significant strides in meeting the strategic plan objectives. Collier County expended an estimated $2,669,701.85 in CDBG, HOME, and ESG funding on activities meeting its strategic plan goals and assisted approximately 391 persons through public services, land acquisition to benefit 51 households with future affordable housing, public facilities and infrastructure projects also had an area wide benefit of over 24,587 low-moderate persons in the County. 4. Summary of citizen participation process and consultation process During the preparation of Collier County’s FY2021-2025 Consolidated Plan and FY2021 Action Plan, a Public Hearing was held on May 3, 2021 to obtain the specific housing and related services needs for the County. All comments received have been included in this Consolidated Plan. The following methods were used to obtain public and private input: • Two needs assessment meetings were held on February 17, 2021 to obtain the specific housing and related services needs for the County. • A 30-day comment period was held from April 30, 2021 through May 31, 2021 for the public to review and provide comments on the Annual Action Plan. The plan was available for review in hard copy at the County’s Community and Human Services Division and on the County’s website at https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/your-government/divisions-a- e/community-and-human-services 5. Summary of public comments Below are the summary comments received during the needs assessment meeting. Question 1. What do you believe are the greatest community development needs in the area? Where are these needs most acute? Responses: • Affordable Housing is a large need • There is a deferred maintenance of affordable housing due to past Hurricane Irma • High need for affordable housing in Immokalee • Habitat for Humanity is a proponent affordable housing • There is a high need for senior housing and workforce housing • Access to affordable housing across the spectrum • There are no county incentives for affordable housing • Rural neighborhoods have a high need for rental for low-income households • Land development cost are extraordinarily high • Habitat builds 90-100 per year but still have a waiting list • Other needs include food deserts, low access to transportation, emergency beds and transitional shelters, and not enough housing 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 238 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 13 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) • Bulk of the economy is in the coastal areas in Collier. • Rural areas have several low wages jobs • Majority of income for Collier County residents earn less than $35,000 a year. • 2-bedroom rent is about $1,500 per month • Median home prices in Collier are $550,000 • There is a high influx of out of state persons using up affordable rental property. Question 2 What do you believe are the greatest fair and affordable housing needs in the area? Where is this housing most needed? • The greatest need is access to housing under $400,000. • Lots of development of Condo’s that are under $300,000 with HOAs which makes it unaffordable. • Strong coalition of nonprofit network • Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance is currently building 128 affordable units. Question 3. Do area residents of similar incomes generally have the same range of housing options? No, there are not good housing options for low wage earners. Low wage earners may have to rent a room or substandard units. Question 4. Are there any barriers other than income/savings that might limit housing choices? Primary barrier is affordability, clients have to decide where to live. Question 5. Are public resources (e.g., parks, schools, roads, police & fire services, etc.) invested evenly throughout all neighborhoods? • County has put in sufficient efforts to ensuring equal resources like parks in all areas. • There is a greater focus on public resources available throughout the County. • 80% of Collier is restricted by wetlands. • Rural Neighborhood, a nonprofit organization, has acquired affordable rental housing and will build 400-unit apartment complex. Other Comments: 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 239 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 14 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) The issue of persons who are not legal remains with any funds appropriated from Collier County since there was an Executive Summary passed by the BCC for housing programs back in 2016 that stated in Collier funds would be used for U.S. citizens and registered aliens. 6. Summary of comments or views not accepted and the reasons for not accepting them. All comments were accepted. 7. Summary In summary, the Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plan have been developed with community input and reflect the needs of the County. Many components of the Consolidated Plan were built on prior plans and strategies generated by local input. During the next Five-year Consolidated Plan period the County will continue to utilize CDBG, HOME and ESG funding to address the priority needs of low-income households. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 240 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 15 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) The Process The Consolidated Plan was developed through extensive consultation with partner organizations and other stakeholders, as well as broad input from community members. Several intergovernmental and advisory committees—representing the affordable housing provider, advocates, and other key community stakeholders—played an integral role. The Consolidated Plan also incorporated valuable data and analysis from several recently published reports on demographic, housing, community, and economic development conditions and needs. Service providers also shared their insights through an online survey. Extensive public outreach was conducted to allow other community members to share their insights during the planning process through public hearings, and online surveys. This section summarizes the extensive consultation and citizen outreach conducted. PR-05 Lead & Responsible Agencies 24 CFR 91.200(b) 1. Describe agency/entity responsible for preparing the Consolidated Plan and those responsible for administration of each grant program and funding source The following are the agencies/entities responsible for preparing the Consolidated Plan and those responsible for administration of each grant program and funding source. Agency Role Name Department/Agency CDBG Administrator Collier County Community & Human Services Division HOME Administrator Collier County Community & Human Services Division ESG Administrator Collier County Community & Human Services Division Table 1 – Responsible Agencies Narrative The Collier County Community & Human Services Division is the lead agency responsible for the development, administration, and review of the 2021-2025 Consolidated Plan and the 2021 Annual Action Plan. The Division administers Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME), and Emergency Solutions Grants (ESG) funds received from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), and coordinates execution of projects related to the priorities and goals identified in the Consolidated Plan. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 241 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 16 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Consolidated Plan Public Contact Information Kristi Sonntag, Director Community and Human Services Division 3339 East Tamiami Trail Health and Public Services Building H, Room 213 Naples, Florida 34112 Phone: (239) 252-2486 Fax: (239) 252-2638 Email: Kristi.Sonntag@colliercountyfl.gov Website: http://www.colliergov.net/your-government/divisions-a-e/community-and-human- services 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 242 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 17 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) PR-10 Consultation – 91.100, 91.110, 91.200(b), 91.300(b), 91.215(I) and 91.315(I) 1. Introduction The County developed an outreach effort to maximize input from a large cross-section of stakeholders. This outreach effort included public meetings, neighborhood meetings, published meeting notices, and a web survey conducted in both English and Spanish. Consultation with the community and affected service providers is a fundamental component of the Consolidated Plan and Action Plan process. Collier County conducted significant consultation with citizens, municipal officials, non-profit agencies, public housing agencies, governmental agencies, and the Continuum of Care in preparing this Plan. The last piece of the stakeholder outreach component involved surveying local broadband and hazard mitigation agencies. Additionally, a total of 536 stakeholders completed surveys inquiring about the community and housing needs throughout the County. The County held two virtual public meetings on February 17, 2021 at 11:00am and 3:00pm through its public participation process prior to the development of the plan and one public meeting to review the draft priorities. These meetings are summarized in the Citizen Participation Section of this plan. Drafts of the plans have been posted on the County webpage. Notices of public meetings and hearings were published in the local newspaper. Stakeholder Focus Groups and Interviews: From February 2021 through April 2021, a series of stakeholder meetings and interviews was conducted to discuss issues and opportunities related to housing and community development needs as well as fair housing issues. Individuals representing government and policy makers, nonprofit organizations, affordable housing providers, and other interested parties were invited to participate to ensure that as many points of view as possible were heard. Over the course of one-on-one interviews and small focus group meetings, approximately five local nonprofit organizations provided their feedback in person. Several meetings were held with the local committees and in other settings. Public presentations of the findings and recommendations from the Needs Assessment, Market Analysis, and Priority and Needs sections were shared at multiple community meetings in February. Community and Agency Surveys: Separate online surveys were developed to gather information about current community conditions and needs. A total of 536 representatives from community agencies and the public responded to the online survey. This survey sought input from housing community development stakeholders and community members for the purposes of identifying priority needs, reviewing, and providing feedback on the County’s current priorities, and providing feedback on the housing and community development conditions in Collier County. The agency survey received responses from a range of organizations including city agencies, housing providers, and social service providers and advocate groups. The participating agencies provide social services support to low-income and near-homeless populations to maintain housing and secure available public and private resources. Agencies providing temporary and 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 243 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 18 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) transitional housing to at-risk populations like single mothers, victims of domestic abuse, elderly, people with disabilities and/or mental illnesses, etc. were identified and reached out to for information through the survey as well as in-depth interviews. Consolidated Plan Advisory Committee: The Affordable Housing Advisory Committee provided input and feedback during several meetings on current housing and community development conditions, needs, and strategies. Provide a concise summary of the jurisdiction’s activities to enhance coordination between public and assisted housing providers and private and governmental health, mental health, and service agencies (91.215(I)). During the development of the Consolidated Plan, the County sought to encourage a high level of public communication and agency consultation in an effort to demonstrate its commitment to identifying priority needs and engaging the participation of citizens, public agencies, and nonprofit organizations in a positive and collaborative manner. A list of stakeholders and affordable housing providers was developed and included public agencies and private nonprofit organizations whose missions included the provision of affordable housing and human services to LMI households and persons. These stakeholders were invited to participate in needs assessment meetings held for the purpose of developing the Consolidated Plan. The list of stakeholders is included in the Citizen Participation Comments section. Based on the public meetings, a set of priorities was established by the County for the next five years as shown in SP- 25 of this document. Describe coordination with the Continuum of Care and efforts to address the needs of homeless persons (particularly chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans, and unaccompanied youth) and persons at risk of homelessness. Collier County staff attends bi-monthly meetings with the Hunger & Homeless Coalition of Collier County and area service providers to enhance the community's comprehensive Continuum of Care system to end homelessness. This dynamic partnership includes collaborative efforts of a variety of community groups, government agencies. The Hunger & Homeless Coalition of Collier County serves as the Lead Agency and has been designated by the CoC as the Collaborative Applicant to apply for the HUD CoC grant on behalf of Collier County’s Continuum of Care. The County enhances coordination of public, private, and non-profit housing providers, human service agencies, and social service providers through the following actions:  Continues to work with other jurisdictions and the Collier County Housing Authority to prioritize housing needs, provide services, and maximize the use of federal, state, and local funds for affordable housing, community development, and related services.  Continues to participate in coordinated efforts for shelter and services assisting homeless individuals and families. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 244 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 19 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)  County staff participates in many of the committees that provide direction for 10-year plan to end homelessness. Describe consultation with the Continuum(s) of Care that serves the jurisdiction's area in determining how to allocate ESG funds, develop performance standards and evaluate outcomes, and develop funding, policies, and procedures for the administration of HMIS. The Collier County Hunger and Homeless Coalition (CCHHC) serves as the lead agency for Collier County’s Continuum of Care. Members of the Continuum of Care provided input during stakeholder interviews and in the project selection process. The CoC is responsible for designating a Homeless Management Information System (HMIS) and a Lead Agency responsible for its management and has primary responsibility for ensuring that Homeless Management Information System (HMIS) is fully funded with appropriate policies and procedures, which were last updated in 2020. The CoC also works closely Collier County (ESG recipient) to allocate funds and monitor outcomes. 2. Describe Agencies, groups, organizations, and others who participated in the process and describe the jurisdictions consultations with housing, social service agencies and other entities. Individual consultations with members of public and non-profit organizations took place throughout the development of the Consolidated Plan. Additionally, a survey was conducted. Input from these meetings and survey information assisted with the identification of community needs, market conditions, priority needs and the resulting strategic plan. 1 Agency/Group/Organization Able Academy Agency/Group/Organization Type Children Services What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Other – Non-Housing Community Development Needs How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation or areas for improved coordination? The organization was consulted through a virtual Needs Assessment Meeting 2 Agency/Group/Organization Boys & Girls Club of Collier County Agency/Group/Organization Type Youth services 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 245 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 20 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Other – Non-Housing Community Development Needs How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation or areas for improved coordination? The organization was consulted through a virtual Needs Assessment Meeting 3 Agency/Group/Organization Children's Advocacy Center of Collier County Agency/Group/Organization Type Youth services What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Other – Non-Housing Community Development Needs How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation or areas for improved coordination? The organization was consulted through a virtual Needs Assessment Meeting 4 Agency/Group/Organization Collier County Housing Authority Agency/Group/Organization Type Housing What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Housing Need Assessment How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation or areas for improved coordination? The organization was consulted through a virtual Needs Assessment Meeting 5 Agency/Group/Organization Collier County Hunger and Homeless Coalition Agency/Group/Organization Type Homeless Services 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 246 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 21 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Other – Non-Housing Community Development Needs How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation or areas for improved coordination? The organization was consulted through a virtual Needs Assessment Meeting 6 Agency/Group/Organization Collier Resource Center, Inc. Agency/Group/Organization Type Supportive Services What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Other – Non-Housing Community Development Needs How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation or areas for improved coordination? The organization was consulted through a virtual Needs Assessment Meeting 7 Agency/Group/Organization Collier Senior Resources Agency/Group/Organization Type Senior Services What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Other – Non-Housing Community Development Needs How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation or areas for improved coordination? The organization was consulted through a virtual Needs Assessment Meeting 8 Agency/Group/Organization David Lawrence Centers for Behavioral Health Agency/Group/Organization Type Special Needs Services 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 247 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 22 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Other – Non-Housing Community Development Needs How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation or areas for improved coordination? The organization was consulted through a virtual Needs Assessment Meeting 9 Agency/Group/Organization Drug Free Collier Agency/Group/Organization Type Special Needs Services What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Other – Non-Housing Community Development Needs How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation or areas for improved coordination? The organization was consulted through a virtual Needs Assessment Meeting 10 Agency/Group/Organization Empty Bowls Naples, Inc Agency/Group/Organization Type Supportive Services What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Other – Non-Housing Community Development Needs How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation or areas for improved coordination? The organization was consulted through a virtual Needs Assessment Meeting 11 Agency/Group/Organization Grace Place for Children and Families Agency/Group/Organization Type Youth services 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 248 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 23 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Other – Non-Housing Community Development Needs How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation or areas for improved coordination? The organization was consulted through a virtual Needs Assessment Meeting 12 Agency/Group/Organization Habitat for Humanity of Collier County Agency/Group/Organization Type Housing What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Housing Need Assessment How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation or areas for improved coordination? The organization was consulted through a virtual Needs Assessment Meeting 13 Agency/Group/Organization Harry Chapin Food Bank Agency/Group/Organization Type Community Services What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Other – Non-Housing Community Development Needs How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation or areas for improved coordination? The organization was consulted through a virtual Needs Assessment Meeting 14 Agency/Group/Organization Hope for Families Ministry Agency/Group/Organization Type Community Services 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 249 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 24 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Other – Non-Housing Community Development Needs How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation or areas for improved coordination? The organization was consulted through a virtual Needs Assessment Meeting 15 Agency/Group/Organization Immokalee CRA Agency/Group/Organization Type Neighborhood Organization What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Other – Non-Housing Community Development Needs How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation or areas for improved coordination? The organization was consulted through a virtual Needs Assessment Meeting 16 Agency/Group/Organization Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance Agency/Group/Organization Type Fair Housing What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Services - Barriers to Fair Housing How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation or areas for improved coordination? The organization was consulted through a virtual Needs Assessment Meeting 17 Agency/Group/Organization Legal Aid Service of Collier County Agency/Group/Organization Type Legal Services 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 250 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 25 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Other – Non-Housing Community Development Needs How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation or areas for improved coordination? The organization was consulted through a virtual Needs Assessment Meeting 18 Agency/Group/Organization Lighthouse of Collier Agency/Group/Organization Type Special Needs Services What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Other – Non-Housing Community Development Needs How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation or areas for improved coordination? The organization was consulted through a virtual Needs Assessment Meeting 19 Agency/Group/Organization Meals of Hope Agency/Group/Organization Type Supportive Services What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Other – Non-Housing Community Development Needs How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation or areas for improved coordination? The organization was consulted through a virtual Needs Assessment Meeting 20 Agency/Group/Organization NAMI Collier County Agency/Group/Organization Type Supportive Services 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 251 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 26 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Other – Non-Housing Community Development Needs How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation or areas for improved coordination? The organization was consulted through a virtual Needs Assessment Meeting 21 Agency/Group/Organization Naples Senior Center at JFCS Agency/Group/Organization Type Senior Services What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Other – Non-Housing Community Development Needs How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation or areas for improved coordination? The organization was consulted through a virtual Needs Assessment Meeting 22 Agency/Group/Organization Our Daily Bread Food Pantry Incorporated Agency/Group/Organization Type Community Services What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Other – Non-Housing Community Development Needs How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation or areas for improved coordination? The organization was consulted through a virtual Needs Assessment Meeting 23 Agency/Group/Organization Residential Options of Florida (ROOF) Agency/Group/Organization Type Homeless Services 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 252 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 27 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Services – Homeless How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation or areas for improved coordination? The organization was consulted through a virtual Needs Assessment Meeting 24 Agency/Group/Organization St. Matthews House Agency/Group/Organization Type Homeless Services What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Services – Homeless How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation or areas for improved coordination? The organization was consulted through a virtual Needs Assessment Meeting 25 Agency/Group/Organization St. Vincent de Paul Society, Naples Agency/Group/Organization Type Community Services What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Other – Non-Housing Community Development Needs How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation or areas for improved coordination? The organization was consulted through a virtual Needs Assessment Meeting 26 Agency/Group/Organization STARability Foundation Agency/Group/Organization Type Special Needs Services 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 253 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 28 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Other – Non-Housing Community Development Needs How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation or areas for improved coordination? The organization was consulted through a virtual Needs Assessment Meeting 27 Agency/Group/Organization The Immokalee Foundation Agency/Group/Organization Type Supportive Services What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Other – Non-Housing Community Development Needs How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation or areas for improved coordination? The organization was consulted through a virtual Needs Assessment Meeting 28 Agency/Group/Organization The Salvation Army Naples Agency/Group/Organization Type Community Services What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Other – Non-Housing Community Development Needs How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation or areas for improved coordination? The organization was consulted through a virtual Needs Assessment Meeting 29 Agency/Group/Organization The Shelter for Abused Women & Children Agency/Group/Organization Type Special Needs Services 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 254 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 29 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Other – Non-Housing Community Development Needs How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation or areas for improved coordination? The organization was consulted through a virtual Needs Assessment Meeting 30 Agency/Group/Organization United Way of Collier and the Keys Agency/Group/Organization Type Supportive Services What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Other – Non-Housing Community Development Needs How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation or areas for improved coordination? The organization was consulted through a virtual Needs Assessment Meeting 31 Agency/Group/Organization Wounded Warriors of Collier Agency/Group/Organization Type Veterans Services What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Other – Non-Housing Community Development Needs How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation or areas for improved coordination? The organization was consulted through a virtual Needs Assessment Meeting 32 Agency/Group/Organization Youth Haven, Inc. Agency/Group/Organization Type Youth services 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 255 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 30 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Other – Non-Housing Community Development Needs How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation or areas for improved coordination? The organization was consulted through a virtual Needs Assessment Meeting Table 2 – Other local / regional / federal planning efforts 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 256 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 31 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Identify any Agency Types not consulted and provide rationale for not consulting. All entities were considered for consultation. Other local/regional/state/federal planning efforts considered when preparing the Plan Name of Plan Lead Organization How do the goals of your Strategic Plan overlap with the goals of each plan? Continuum of Care Hunger & Homeless Coalition of Collier County Affordable housing, services, and economic development 10 Year Plan to Prevent Hunger and End Homelessness Hunger & Homeless Coalition of Collier County The Strategic Plan's goals to address homelessness align with Continuum of Care's goals and strategies. Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice, 2021 Collier County Barriers to affordable housing opportunities from the Analysis of Impediments were included in this Consolidated Plan. Collier County MHSA Strategic Plan 2019 Collier County The MHSA, adopted in 2019, coordinates assistance for those with mental health and substance abuse in the area. Urban Land Institute Advisory Services Report Collier County The ULI Report defines how the county will expand affordable housing. Table 2 – Other local / regional / federal planning efforts Describe cooperation and coordination with other public entities, including the State and any adjacent units of general local government, in the implementation of the Consolidated Plan (91.215(l)) In accordance with 24 CFR 91.100(4), the County notified adjacent units of local government of the non-housing community development needs included in its Consolidated Plan. The County will continue to interact with public entities at all levels to ensure coordination and cooperation in the implementation of the Consolidated Plan and thereby maximizing the benefits of the County’s housing and community development activities for the residents being served. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 257 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 32 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Coordination with private industry, businesses, developers, and social service agencies included Individual consultations were conducted with affordable housing developers and the social service agencies. The input received during these consultations informed the development of priority needs and recommended strategies. For example, through consultations with developers, it was determined that there remains insufficient access to affordable housing. Likewise, developers have a difficult time finding developable land for affordable housing. The Collier County staff that coordinated the development of the 2021 Consolidated Plan used the Citizen Participation Plan as a guide for consultations. Consultations were conducted with public and non-profit organizations. There were also several public advisory committees that were consulted. Input received from the consultations informed the Needs Assessment, Market Analysis, and Strategic Plan Narrative (optional): Combined, these agencies provide housing and supportive services to the community's special needs populations, including persons with disabilities, homeless families and individuals, chronic homeless persons, persons with HIV/AIDS, and the elderly. In addition to many of the agencies listed above many of the groups and agencies that were consulted provided information during the development of the plan. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 258 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 33 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) PR-15 Citizen Participation – 91.105, 91.115, 91.200(c) and 91.300(c) 1. Summary of citizen participation process/Efforts made to broaden citizen participation. Summarize citizen participation process and how it impacted goal setting. Collier County staff worked with the community in developing goals and objectives. The developed goals are a result of feedback from the community regarding issues to be resolved and projects in need of funding. Collier County has an adopted Citizen Participation Plan to ensure consistent outreach efforts. A community needs survey in English and Spanish was available to residents, housing service providers. The survey ran from January 12, 2021 through February 5, 2021 and was advertised along with the community, meetings through a newspaper advertisement and English and Spanish. A total of 536 surveys were collected. The community survey was released online and promoted through the County’s Community and Human Services’ web-based resources. The survey respondents ranked helping families with children, providing mortgage and ongoing rental assistance, increasing emergency shelter space/permanent supportive housing, creating jobs in low-income neighborhoods, creating additional rental housing, assisting human service agencies with facilities acquisition or improvements, and housing services as high priorities and needs for the Collier County community. All municipalities were encouraged to have active participation in preparation of the Consolidated Plan by all residents who are affected by Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME), and Emergency Solutions Grants (ESG) funds. The Citizen Participation Plan outlines local responsibilities to provide opportunities for resident involvement. In addition to the survey, residents were invited to participate in an open house to learn about needs identified and strategies being considered to address those needs. Participants were able to provide direct feedback. This feedback informed the selection of priority needs and strategies for the Consolidated Plan, the identification of impediments to fair housing, and the identification of regulatory barriers. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 259 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 34 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Citizen Participation Outreach 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 260 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 35 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Sort Order Mode of Outreach Target of Outreach Summary of Response /attendance Summary of Comments re ceived Summary of comments not accepted and reasons URL (If applicable) 1 Internet Outreach Non-targeted broad community 536 See Survey Results in Citizen Participation Comments. None https://www.surveymonkey.com/ r/CollierCountyNeeds https://www.surveymonkey.com/ r/ColliernecesitaEspanol 2 Virtual Public Needs Assessment Meetings Housing, community development, and social service organizations Five local organizations attended the Needs Assessment Meeting. Affordable Housing, lack of shelters, need for housing rehabilitation None meet.google.com/ikw-qtfk-jbz 3 Public Hearing Non- targeted/broad community The public was notified of the public meetings via a newspaper ad The County did not receive any comments during the public hearing. All comments were accepted 4 Direct Contact Community Stakeholders, Nonprofits, 27 Community stakeholder interviews were held to assess needs in the County. Consolidated Plan 2020-2025 priority needs were established from comments. N/A N/A 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 261 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 36 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Sort Order Mode of Outreach Target of Outreach Summary of Response /attendance Summary of Comments re ceived Summary of comments not accepted and reasons URL (If applicable) 5 Newspaper Ad Non-English Speaking - Specify other language: Spanish Nontargeted/ broad community A public notice published in the Naples Daily News on advertised the availability of a draft version of the plan. This draft was accessible online at the Collier County Community and Human Services' website beginning on and ending on during which time public comment could be submitted There were no comments received All comments are accepted, and none rejected Table 3 – Citizen Participation Outreach 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 262 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 37 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Community Profile and Needs The Collier County Consolidated Plan relies upon multiple forms of qualitative and quantitative data as well as community input in order to identify housing, homelessness, and community development needs and trends. This picture of need is the basis of the proposed objectives and outcomes for the 2021 Consolidated Plan. In addition to the US Census, updated American Community Survey (ACS) data and community surveys that provides the foundation for development of the document, the Cities of Naples, Everglades, and Marco Island built on the work of several active committees and recent studies that addressed housing, homeless and community development. The assessment was also informed by additional consultations with city officials and other important stakeholders such as the Affordable Housing Advisory Committee, United Way of Collier County, and the Collier County Homeless Coalition. In 2020, the County’s economy has continued to diversify and improve, while at the same time leaving many in the community still struggling to find jobs with wages to cover increasing housing costs. There is a significant number of households who cannot meet the basic needs for food, shelter, medical care, and transportation. In addition, there are a growing number of seniors, persons with disabilities, and others who are unable to work. These factors, combined with a very tight housing market, have resulted in many households paying more than they can afford, and a growing number of persons experiencing homelessness. It is important to note that the impacts of the COVID-19 are too recent to be reflected in the data used for the analysis provided below. Population Growth As noted in the 2019 Census American Community Survey, Collier County, Florida had a total population of 384,902 of which 195,189 or 50.7% are female and 189,713 or 49.2% are males when compared to 2010, County’s population was 322,472 with 162,493 or 50.3% of females and 159,979 or 49.6% of males. Therefore, reflecting a 19.3% population increase in the Collier County. Population grew to 21,812 in Naples, 7.32% increase since 2010. The population also increased in Marco Island to 17,834, a 5.14% increase since 2010. Last, Everglades City’s population decreased to 190, a 41.89% decrease since 2010. Age Distribution The population of Collier County is aging. In 2010, there were 70,289 people aged 60 to 75 and this grew to 87,043 in 2020. For the same period, there were 136,079 people under age 45 in 2010, which has also risen to 162,534 in 2020. Racial and Ethnic Composition Collier County is becoming increasingly racially and ethnically diverse. Latino residents are the fastest growing population, representing 28.6% of the population in the County in 2019. While 11.5% of the population is non-white comprised of 28,704 African Americans, 6,961 Asians, 1,768 American Indian and Alaska Natives, and 6,414 multi-racial persons. %%% Household Composition 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 263 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 38 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) As of 2020, family households still make up the largest percentage of households with 69.19% (6,441 in Naples, 5,714 in Marco Island, and 57 in Everglades City) and of those, 10,194 of households are single female- headed households. There has also been a significant increase in single person households which now make up 30.80% of all households. The largest growth in household type is non-family households which increased 12.24% between 2010 and 2020. Average household size is 2.71 in Collier County. Multigenerational living is defined as residing in a home with three or more generations. According to Generations United, the past ten years have seen a remarkably large leap in multigenerational living, from 7% of Americans 2011 to 26% of Americans in 2021. As noted in the 2010 Census, Collier County had a total of 118,258 households of which 2.6% (3,022) were living in multigenerational households. This data is collected during the decennial census every ten years and this data is the most recent data available. MULTIGENERATIONAL HOUSEHOLDS Label Estimate Percent Multigenerational Households 3,022 2.6% Other Households 115,236 97.4% TOTAL 118,258 100% Source: 2010 American Community Survey, 2010: ACS 1-Year Estimates Detailed Tables Income and Poverty According to 2019 ACS, the median income of households in Collier County, Florida was $76,025. An estimated 4.8% of households had income below $10,000 a year and 13.1% had income over $200,000 or more. Although growing, the Median Household Income for Collier County is higher than the US ($65,712) and our northern county, Lee County ($57,832). Further, there are many residents in Collier County that are struggling, as evidenced by other indicators: 6.5% or 9,164 residents receive food stamp benefits (SNAP), 61% of students are eligible for free and reduced lunch. Low wages also contribute to financial instability. In 2019, 48,825 individuals in Collier County had incomes below 125%%of the poverty levels as indicated in the chart below. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 264 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 39 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Source: https://dch.georgia.gov/document/document/2019-federal-poverty-guidelines/download 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 265 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 40 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Persons with Disabilities According to the 2019 ACS, of the total population of 384,902 there were 47,569 people, or 12.3%, live with one or more disabilities. The highest reported disabilities include ambulatory at 6.3%, cognitive at 3.9%, and difficulty with independent living 5.2%. Persons Experiencing Homelessness The 2021 Point-in-Time Count (PIT) identified 568 people in Collier County experiencing homelessness, a 5.8% decrease from 2020. Over 25% of this population, or 144 individuals, met HUD’s definition of unsheltered. As a disclaimer, these numbers may be under reported due to COVID. The 2021 PIT count also found that 169 persons experiencing homelessness were seriously mentally ill, 198 reported substance abuse, 34 were veterans, 49 were seniors, and 49 were families with comprised of adults and 109 children. For FY 2021, Collier County reported that 568 unduplicated individuals who were homeless received human services from one or more agencies. During the 2020-2021 school year, the Collier County public school reported 805 homeless youth, includes students who are staying with friends or family. The reported number includes 183 homeless youth (16 and older) who were unaccompanied. Persons with Special Needs who are not Homeless Limited new data exists specific to non-homeless special needs populations in Collier County. There are numerous sub-populations in this community. Of those, there are some that have both enough and unique housing and service needs that warrant identification. Those include the following: families with children, seniors, ex-offenders, people with HIV/AIDS, victims of domestic violence, people with drug and alcohol addictions, people who are evicted or foreclosed, people with physical and mental disabilities, veterans, youth and young adults, and youth aging out of foster care. Employment and Economy Economic conditions in Collier County have recovered significantly in the past decade, and the County has emerged as a more diversified economy than it was before the Great Recession. The number of jobs has grown steadily during the decade, and unemployment rates have remained relatively low during recent years (below 3%). Wages have slightly risen 1.9% in the County as reflected in the household earnings chart below: Household Earnings 2017-2019 Collier County, Florida 2017 2018 2019 $40,622.00 $40,892.00 $41,415.00 Source: Census, ACS Estimates 2017-2019, data.census.gov As of 2019, there were 166,353 (50.7%) persons in the labor force 16 years and older and 161,557 (49.3%) not in the labor force. According to 2019 ACS estimates, 4,929 or 1.5% of the total population was unemployed. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 266 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 41 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) While there have been recent and significant job losses as a result of COVID-19, it is unclear how sustained these job losses will be as social distancing measures diminish. It is apparent however that many people with limited incomes are experiencing financial instability as a result of recent events. Housing Units and Tenure According to 2019 ACS estimates, the County had a total of 222,289 housing units. The majority of the housing units are single family 1-unit detached unit structures at 90,552 (40.7%) of the total units. The remainder consisting of 1-unit, attached at 15,145 (6.8%), 2-9 multi-family units at 44,174 (20.1%), 10-20 multi-family units at 59,697 (26.9%) and a small share of mobile/manufactured homes at 12,499 (5.6%) of the housing units. Housing Cost Burden While wages and incomes have continued to rise in recent years, they have not kept pace with the cost of both owner and rental housing in Collier County. From 2010 to 2019, Median Household Income increased 44% from 2010 at $52,730 to 2019 at $76,025. Housing costs in the county area have risen more sharply since 2010, especially in recent years. According to 2019 ACS estimates, the County’s median home prices have increased by 44.8% between 2010 and 2019, reaching $370,000. The County’s median gross rental rates have also increased substantially faster than incomes and the home values. Between 2010 and 2019, the median rental rate rose to 48.3% from $942 in 2010 to $1,397 in 2019. As a result, many households pay more for housing than is affordable, or are unable to afford any housing. Households paying more than 30% of household income are considered to have a ‘housing cost burden’. A total of 9,545 of renters in Collier County have cost burdens greater than 30% but less than 50% of the Area Median Income, while a total of 14,685 of homeowners have cost burdens greater than 30% but less than 50% of the Area Median Income. Housing Conditions and Lead Based Paint Approximately 17% (37,852) of the total housing units were built prior to 1980 and may contain lead-based paint. Approximately 37,852 homes pose potential lead-based paint hazards in Collier County. Despite the age of the housing stock, the physical condition of the housing in Collier County is generally good, as there are relatively few housing units (1,715) in the area that are considered substandard according to HUD. Based on input received during provider and public consultations, units available to low-income residents tend to have more significant issues, and because of the scarcity of affordable low-income housing, residents are reluctant to raise their concerns for fear of losing the housing. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 267 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 42 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Needs Assessment The Needs Assessment examines needs related to affordable housing, special needs housing, community development and homelessness. With input from data and market analysis, as well as community outreach and stakeholder consultation, the Needs Assessment identifies needs that form the basis for the Strategic Plan section and future programs and projects to implement the strategic plan. NA-05 Overview Needs Assessment Overview Based on HUD provided figures, the following data indicates the number and percentage of renters and homeowners who may be subject to housing problems, based on income level. The current economic recession has substantially increased the number of households experiencing housing problems and cost burdens. HUD receives a “special tabulation” of data from the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS) that is largely not available through standard Census products. These “special tabulation” data provide counts of the numbers of households that fit certain combinations of HUD-specified criteria such as housing needs, HUD-defined income limits (primarily 30, 50, and 80% of area median income) and household types of particular interest to planners and policymakers. This data, known as the Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) data, is used by local governments for housing planning and as part of the Consolidated Planning process. Assessing the specific housing needs of Collier County is critical to creating a realistic and responsive affordable housing strategy. As such, an assessment of the County’s affordable rental and single-family homes was conducted based on available demographic, economic and housing data for Collier County utilizing HUD’s new eCon Planning Suite downloaded in the Integrated Disbursement and Information System (IDIS). The eCon Planning Suite pre-populates the most up-to-date housing and economic data available to assist jurisdictions identify funding priorities in the Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plan. Highlights of this assessment are provided in this section. NA-10 Housing Needs Assessment - 24 CFR 91.205 (a,b,c) Summary of Housing Needs According to the 2019 American Community Survey, Collier County is home to 384,902 residents. As indicated below by the ACS data, there were 321,520 residents living in 118,289 households in 2010, as shown in Table 4. As noted in the 2019 ACS, Collier County had a total of 140,578 households. By comparison in 2010, the population and number of households had increased by 19.7%. Likewise, the number of households in 2019 (140,578) also increased by 18.8% since 2010. Compared to the 2019 State of Florida and national figures of $59,227.00 and $65,712.00 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 268 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 43 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) respectively, Collier County has a higher median income of $76,025.00 compared to the state and the national median household income. HOUSING TENURE Estimate Percent Owner-Occupied Housing Units 104,357 74.2% Renter-Occupied Housing Units 36,221 25.8% TOTAL UNITS 140,578 100.0% 2019 ACS (Most Recent Year) Demographics Base Year: 2010 Most Recent Year: 2019 % Change Population 321,520 384,902 19.7% Households 118,289 140,578 18.8% Median Income $52,730 $76,025 44.1% Table 4 - Housing Needs Assessment Demographics Data Source: 2010 ACS (Base Year), 2019 ACS (Most Recent Year) Number of Households Table Table 5 - Total Households Table Data Source: 2011-2015 CHAS 0-30% HAMFI >30-50% HAMFI >50-80% HAMFI >80- 100% HAMFI >100% HAMFI Total Households 11,000 13,090 20,790 11,710 54,545 Small Family Households 3,474 4,470 5,800 4,630 18,420 Large Family Households 870 1,430 2,084 710 2,724 Household contains at least one person 62-74 years of age 2,484 3,125 5,380 3,154 18,700 Household contains at least one-person age 75 or older 2,418 3,040 5,169 2,140 10,934 Households with one or more children 6 years old or younger 1,804 2,849 2,868 1,378 4,076 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 269 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 44 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Housing Needs Summary Tables 1. Housing Problems (Households with one of the listed needs) Renter Owner 0-30% AMI >30- 50% AMI >50- 80% AMI >80- 100% AMI Total 0-30% AMI >30- 50% AMI >50- 80% AMI >80- 100% AMI Total NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS Substandard Housing - Lacking complete plumbing or kitchen facilities 60 190 105 120 475 35 34 145 85 299 Severely Overcrowded - With >1.51 people per room (and complete kitchen and plumbing) 205 340 105 4 654 80 8 30 55 173 Overcrowded - With 1.01-1.5 people per room (and none of the above problems) 555 855 534 160 2,104 169 270 430 195 1,064 Housing cost burden greater than 50% of income (and none of the above problems) 3,180 2,120 860 90 6,250 3,325 2,300 2,175 935 8,735 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 270 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 45 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Renter Owner 0-30% AMI >30- 50% AMI >50- 80% AMI >80- 100% AMI Total 0-30% AMI >30- 50% AMI >50- 80% AMI >80- 100% AMI Total Housing cost burden greater than 30% of income (and none of the above problems) 235 1,985 3,440 1,025 6,685 645 1,865 3,205 1,760 7,475 Zero/negative Income (and none of the above problems) 495 0 0 0 495 959 0 0 0 959 Table 6 – Housing Problems Table Data Source: 2011-2015 CHAS The following tables identify housing needs by both income bracket and renter/owner. The housing problems are identified as follows: 1. Substandard housing; unit lacking complete kitchen facilities. 2. Substandard housing; unit lacking complete bathroom facilities. 3. Cost burden of more than 30% of the household income (for renters, housing costs include rent paid by the tenant plus utilities; for owners, housing costs include mortgage payments, taxes, insurance, and utilities) 4. Overcrowding: more than one (1) person per room, not including bathrooms, porches, foyers, halls, or half-rooms Severe housing problems are: 1. Substandard housing; unit lacking complete kitchen facilities. 2. Substandard housing; unit lacking complete bathroom facilities. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 271 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 46 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) 3. Severe cost burden of more than 50% of the household income (for renters, housing costs include rent paid by the tenant plus utilities; for owners, housing costs include mortgage payments, taxes, insurance, and utilities 4. Severe overcrowding more than 1.5 persons per room, not including bathrooms, porches, foyers, halls, or half-rooms 2. Housing Problems 2 (Households with one or more Severe Housing Problems: Lacks kitchen or complete plumbing, severe overcrowding, severe cost burden) Renter Owner 0-30% AMI >30- 50% AMI >50- 80% AMI >80- 100% AMI Total 0-30% AMI >30- 50% AMI >50- 80% AMI >80- 100% AMI Total NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS Having 1 or more of four housing problems 3,995 3,500 1,604 380 9,479 3,600 2,605 2,785 1,265 10,255 Having none of four housing problems 685 2,850 6,005 3,709 13,249 1,270 4,125 10,380 6,340 22,115 Household has negative income, but none of the other housing problems 495 0 0 0 495 959 0 0 0 959 Table 7 – Housing Problems 2 Data Source: 2011-2015 CHAS 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 272 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 47 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) 3. Cost Burden > 30% Renter Owner 0-30% AMI >30-50% AMI >50-80% AMI Total 0-30% AMI >30-50% AMI >50-80% AMI Total NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS Small Related 2,044 2,725 1,850 6,619 974 990 1,440 3,404 Large Related 575 730 245 1,550 225 304 600 1,129 Elderly 804 849 1,133 2,786 2,334 2,539 2,975 7,848 Other 765 900 1,357 3,022 630 493 650 1,773 Total need by income 4,188 5,204 4,585 13,977 4,163 4,326 5,665 14,154 Table 8 – Cost Burden > 30% Data Source: 2011-2015 CHAS 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 273 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 48 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) 4. Cost Burden > 50% Renter Owner 0-30% AMI >30-50% AMI >50-80% AMI Total 0-30% AMI >30-50% AMI >50-80% AMI Total NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS Small Related 1,950 1,015 305 3,270 749 635 455 1,839 Large Related 435 85 10 530 130 79 105 314 Elderly 674 740 390 1,804 2,054 1,369 1,395 4,818 Other 715 515 179 1,409 510 268 230 1,008 Total need by income 3,774 2,355 884 7,013 3,443 2,351 2,185 7,979 Table 9 – Cost Burden > 50% Data Source: 2011-2015 CHAS In Collier County, the majority of those households experiencing a housing problem are cost burdened or severely cost burdened. Households defined as “other” experience cost burden and severe cost burden at the highest rate. “Other” is a single person or a nonfamily household, meaning several non-related individuals sharing a household. Those small family households (2-4 family members) and those “other” households experience cost burden and severe cost burden at similar rates. Within the 50-80% AMI bracket, nearly half of those households experiencing severe cost burden are elderly households. This is most indicative of elderly homeowners that are living on a fixed income. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 274 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 49 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) 5. Crowding (More than one person per room) Renter Owner 0-30% AMI >30- 50% AMI >50- 80% AMI >80- 100% AMI Total 0-30% AMI >30- 50% AMI >50- 80% AMI >80- 100% AMI Total NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS Single family households 695 945 589 144 2,373 209 209 375 160 953 Multiple, unrelated family households 65 210 44 10 329 29 69 99 90 287 Other, non-family households 10 50 10 10 80 4 0 0 0 4 Total need by income 770 1,205 643 164 2,782 242 278 474 250 1,244 Table 10 – Crowding Information – 1/2 Data Source: 2011-2015 CHAS 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 275 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 50 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Renter Owner 0-30% AMI >30- 50% AMI >50- 80% AMI Total 0-30% AMI >30- 50% AMI >50- 80% AMI Total Households with Children Present 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Table 11 – Crowding Information – 2/2 Describe the number and type of single person households in need of housing assistance. Estimates of the number of single person households in need of housing assistance are not available for Collier County. In Tables 8 and 9 above, non-elderly single person households are included in the “other” households category, along with non-family households, such as roommates or non-married partner households. Table 8 shows that there are an estimated 3,022 “other” renter households and 1,773 “other” owner households with low or moderate incomes who spend more than 30% of their income on housing. Of these, 48% of renter households and 73% of owner households are also severely cost burdened, meaning that they spend over 50% of their income on housing and may be in the need of housing assistance. Estimate the number and type of families in need of housing assistance who are disabled or victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking. According to the 2015-2019 5-Year American Community Survey, there are an estimated 42,528 disabled persons in Collier County, comprising about 11.5% of its population. While housing need is not estimated for the disabled population, the ACS does provide poverty rates by disability status, which can serve as an indicator of potential need, given that households with lower incomes are more likely to have a housing problem. For persons aged 18 to 64, 25% of the disabled population (11,670 persons) is impoverished, compared to 13% of the non-disabled population. For seniors, the poverty rate of disabled persons is 9% (1,983 persons) compared to 6% for those without a disability. Thus, poverty rates suggest that disabled adults in Collier County would be more likely to have difficulty affording housing than their non-disabled counterparts. Additionally, a limited supply of accessible housing, the cost of making needed modifications, and the limited availability of supportive housing for persons with developmental or substance abuse disabilities represent housing needs for the County’s disabled population. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 276 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 51 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) According to the 2021 Point in Time Count, the County served 122 victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, or stalking who were in need of housing assistance. Input from housing and homeless services providers, however, indicates a continued need for housing for domestic violence victims in Collier County. The Shelter for Abused Women & Children operates two 60-bed emergency shelters in Naples and Immokalee as well as nine transitional living cottages in Naples. According to their 2019-2020 Impact Report, there were 1,686 Collier County domestic violence calls to 911 in 2019. As evidence of the continuing need for housing for domestic violence victims, in its last fiscal year, The Shelter provided over 1,500 nights of housing to women and their children, over 14,689 hours of counseling, and education regarding domestic abuse to more than 20,000 professionals and community members. What are the most common housing problems? By far the most common housing problems in Collier County for both owners and renters are cost burdening and severe cost burdening. Table 8 reveals that 13,977 low- and moderate-income renter households spend more than 30% of their income on housing, as do 14,154 low- and moderate-income owner households. Taken together, there are 28,131 cost burdened households with incomes below 80% AMI. Of these, 14,992 households have a severe cost burden (7,013 renters and 7,979 owners), comprising 31% of total low- and moderate-income households, as Table 9 displays. The high rates of cost burden indicate that many households in the County are not able to adequately save for unexpected events and occasionally even planned expenses. It is important to consider that cost burden impacts households across all income brackets. During stakeholder engagements, community members consistently brought up the issue of limited housing options as a concern. This goes past just affordability, but includes accessibility, proximity to household needs, and size. Households may often choose to be cost burdened in lieu of choosing a housing unit that costs less than 30% of their income. This circumstance impacts low- and moderate-income households most often, and more specifically renter households. Crowding (more than one person per room) affects 2,618 renters and 994 owners with low and moderate incomes, or 9% of all households in that income group (Table 10), a considerably lower share than are affected by cost burdens or severe cost burdens. Substandard housing (lacking complete plumbing or kitchen facilities) affects the smallest number of low- and moderate-income households in Collier County: 355 renters and 214 owners, or 2% of all households with incomes under 80% AMI, according to Table 7. Staff opinion, consultation, and citizen participation demonstrated that the most common housing problems were deferred maintenance, lack of income/savings for down payments, and poor credit scores. These are all consistent with the needs of cost burdened households, and strategies such as housing rehabilitation and down payment assistance were identified as solutions to these problems. Are any populations/household types more affected than others by these problems? 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 277 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 52 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Households with incomes lower than 80% AMI are more affected by housing cost burdens and thus, have the greatest needs. The data in Table 8 reveals that 13,977 low- and moderate-income renter households spend more than 30% of their income on housing, as do 14,154 low- and moderate-income owner households. Over 31% of low-income households are severely cost burdened. Describe the characteristics and needs of Low-income individuals and families with children (especially extremely low-income) who are currently housed but are at imminent risk of either residing in shelters or becoming unsheltered 91.205(c)/91.305(c)). Also discuss the needs of formerly homeless families and individuals who are receiving rapid re-housing assistance and are nearing the termination of that assistance. Individuals with an imminent risk of residing in shelters or becoming unsheltered typically have a combination of financial factors present in their lives: lack of living wage job, rent consuming more than 30% of their income, and high childcare, medical, or transportation costs. In addition to these factors, individuals at risk of homelessness will often have additional issues present such as family conflicts, domestic violence, doubling up with family members, recent crisis, housing with code or safety violations, family members with disabilities, criminal histories, history of mental health or chemical dependency, difficulty navigating systems to access public benefits or community-based services, and prior experience with homelessness. For formerly homeless families and individuals receiving rapid re-housing assistance but nearing the termination of that assistance, key needs include access to Social Security disability and other benefits; stable employment or access to mainstream job training, employment, and education programs; linkages to health and mental health services; convenient access to affordable childcare and transportation; and continued case management and supportive services. If a jurisdiction provides estimates of the at-risk population(s), it should also include a description of the operational definition of the at-risk group and the methodology used to generate the estimates: Collier County does not prepare estimates of its at-risk population. The Collier County Continuum of Care (CoC) uses HMIS to collect and track data on housing and services to persons experiencing homelessness and who are at-risk of homelessness. The CoC utilizes HUD’s official definition of at-risk for homelessness released in January 2012. There are three categories to the definition: Individuals and Families; Unaccompanied Children and Youth, and Families with Children and Youth. The Collier County Hunger and Homeless Coalition’s 2021 Point-in-Time Count of homeless persons identified 568 persons who are experiencing homelessness. Including people staying temporarily with family or friends, in a hotel or motel, or sharing a home on a more or less permanent basis with another family, often living in crowded or inadequate conditions, this number increases to 1,373 persons experiencing homelessness. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 278 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 53 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Specify particular housing characteristics that have been linked with instability and an increased risk of homelessness. The characteristic most closely linked to housing instability is a household’s financial circumstance. Cost burden places households in a situation where unexpected expenses or sheer time of deficit spending may cause a household to become homeless. The United Way Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) Report found that 30% of Collier County households earn the ALICE survival budget or less. The ALICE Report looks at working families and their ability to afford basic needs for the households such as food, clothing, healthcare, transportation, housing, taxes, etc. As cost of housing is a single variable, there are others, too, that may place a household in a vulnerable financial position and increase the chance of becoming homeless. A household that incurs childcare costs that ultimately earns less than 80% of the area median income is at-risk. Additionally, the frequent moves of families who are homeless or at risk of homelessness has placed additional barriers to educational attainment for children. The high housing costs puts household at risk of homelessness at any given time, it is impossible to know which of those households will experience domestic violence, the loss of a job, a death, a health event, or another adverse circumstance that can trigger homelessness. It is extremely difficult to predict the next homeless cases among those who are currently housed. Low incomes and high housing cost burdens are two housing characteristics linked with instability and an increased risk of homelessness. Renters with incomes under 30% AMI and housing costs burdens over 50% are at risk of homelessness, especially if they experience a destabilizing event such as a job loss, reduction in hours, or medical emergency/condition. Additionally, families or individuals doubling up with other, unrelated households are at an increased risk of homelessness. In Collier County, there are 3,774 extremely low-income renter households (under 30% AMI) spending more than 50% of their income on housing. Collier County also has 770 households comprised of multiple, unrelated families living together in overcrowded conditions. Households with members that are elderly, have a disability, or require regular supportive services are also at greater risk. These households, no matter the income bracket, often spend more financial resources on care for these individuals. The care may require time away from work by a family member or require hired help or fee-for-service. In any case, these households are more financially vulnerable; if these households are also earning less than 80% of the area median income, the data shows that this household is likely also cost burdened. These types of households are at increased risk of homelessness. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 279 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 54 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) NA-15 Disproportionately Greater Need: Housing Problems – 91.205 (b)(2) Assess the need of any racial or ethnic group that has disproportionately greater need in comparison to the needs of that category of need as a whole. Introduction HUD defines a disproportionately greater number of housing problems by a racial or ethnic group as when a group experiences housing problem at a rate more than 10% greater than the income group as a whole. The data summarizes the percentage of each minority group experiencing any of the four housing problems: cost burden (paying more than 30% of income for housing); overcrowding (more than one person per room); and lacking complete kitchen facilities or complete plumbing facilities (substandard housing). Income classifications are defined as: extremely low-income (under 30% of HAMFI); low-income (between 30 and 50%); moderate-income (between 50 and 80%); and middle-income (between 80 and 100%). The 2011-2015 CHAS data provided in the tables below include households with or more of the following housing problems:  lack of complete kitchen facilities  lack of complete plumbing facilities  overcrowding (i.e., more than one person per room)  cost burden greater than 30% (i.e., spending more than 30% of income on housing-related costs). 0%-30% of Area Median Income 77% of households in Collier County , at extremely low incomes, have one or more housing problems (8,480 as shown in Table 12). Whites and American Indian, Alaska Native are somewhat less likely to experience a housing need (72% and 50%, respectively), while African Americans, Asians, and Hispanics are more so (84-92%). At 0-30% of Area Median Income, Asians (92%) have a disproportionately greater need than the jurisdiction as a whole. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 280 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 55 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Housing Problems Has one or more of four housing problems Has none of the four housing problems Household has no/negative income, but none of the other housing problems Jurisdiction as a whole 8,480 1,070 1,454 White 4,700 755 1,114 Black / African American 1,010 60 130 Asian 44 0 4 American Indian, Alaska Native 8 4 4 Pacific Islander 0 0 0 Hispanic 2,675 240 200 Other 43 11 2 Table 12 - Disproportionally Greater Need 0 - 30% AMI Data Source: 2011-2015 CHAS *The four housing problems are: 1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities, 2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities, 3. More than one person per room, 4. Cost Burden greater than 30% 30%-50% of Area Median Income Over three-quarters of households with incomes from 30% to 50% AMI have one or more housing problems (76% or 9,960 households). Asians and Whites face housing problems at a somewhat lower rate (55% and 69%, respectively), while other racial/ethnic groups face needs at a higher rate than the jurisdiction as a whole. Two groups have a disproportionately greater rate of housing problems: 88% of African American and 71% of the 14 American Indians/Alaska Natives households have one or more housing needs. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 281 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 56 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Housing Problems Has one or more of four housing problems Has none of the four housing problems Household has no/negative income, but none of the other housing problems Jurisdiction as a whole 9,960 3,135 0 White 5,100 2,305 0 Black / African American 1,130 148 0 Asian 30 25 0 American Indian, Alaska Native 10 4 0 Pacific Islander 0 0 0 Other 51 19 0 Hispanic 3,639 634 0 Table 13 - Disproportionally Greater Need 30 - 50% AMI Data Source: 2011-2015 CHAS *The four housing problems are: 1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities, 2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities, 3. More than one person per room, 4. Cost Burden greater than 30% 50%-80% of Area Median Income Of the 20,795 Collier County households with low incomes, 53% have at least one housing problem. As in other income groups, moderate income Whites face housing needs at a somewhat lower proportion than the county overall (51%), while African Americans and Hispanics have higher rate of housing problems (67% and 55%, respectively). Asians have a disproportionately higher incidence of housing need 86% or 189 households. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 282 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 57 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Housing Problems Has one or more of four housing problems Has none of the four housing problems Household has no/negative income, but none of the other housing problems Jurisdiction as a whole 11,045 9,750 0 White 7,370 7,079 0 Black / African American 709 343 0 Asian 189 30 0 American Indian, Alaska Native 0 19 0 Pacific Islander 0 0 0 Other 52 79 0 Hispanic 2,725 2,200 0 Table 14 - Disproportionally Greater Need 50 - 80% AMI Data Source: 2011-2015 CHAS *The four housing problems are: 1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities, 2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities, 3. More than one person per room, 4. Cost Burden greater than 30% 80%-100% of Area Median Income Of the middle-income households in Collier County, 38% or 4,425 have at least one housing problem. No group has a disproportionately greater need than the jurisdiction as a whole. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 283 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 58 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Housing Problems Has one or more of four housing problems Has none of the four housing problems Household has no/negative income, but none of the other housing problems Jurisdiction as a whole 4,425 7,259 0 White 3,170 4,909 0 Black / African American 255 490 0 Asian 49 44 0 American Indian, Alaska Native 8 55 0 Pacific Islander 0 0 0 Other 10 76 0 Hispanic 933 1,685 0 Table 15 - Disproportionally Greater Need 80 - 100% AMI Data Source: 2011-2015 CHAS *The four housing problems are: 1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities, 2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities, 3. More than one person per room, 4. Cost Burden greater than 30% Discussion Overall, 2011-2015 CHAS data regarding housing problems by income level and race/ethnicity show that need is more common at low incomes households face one or more housing problems. Six groups experience a disproportionately greater incidence of housing needs than the county as a whole. They include low income (30-50% AMI) African American households (of whom 84% face a housing problem) and Asian households (92%) compared to 77% of the jurisdiction as a whole. At moderate incomes (50-80% AMI), African 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 284 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 59 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Americans and Asians face a disproportionate need (67% and 86%, respectively, compared to 53% for the jurisdiction as a whole. Finally, at middle incomes, no group has a disproportionately greater need than the jurisdiction as a whole. NA-20 Disproportionately Greater Need: Severe Housing Problems – 91.205 (b)(2) Assess the need of any racial or ethnic group that has disproportionately greater need in comparison to the needs of that category of need as a whole. Introduction HUD defines a disproportionately greater housing need when a racial or ethnic group experiences housing problems at a rate over 10percentage points than that of the corresponding income level as a whole. The data table below summarizes the percentage of each racial/ethnic group experiencing housing problems by HUD Adjusted Median Family Income (HAMFI) levels. Where the HUD tables below report AMI, they refer to HAMFI. Housing problems include: • Lacks complete kitchen facilities. • Lacks complete plumbing facilities. • More than 1.5 persons per room • Cost Burden over 50% 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 285 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 60 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) 0%-30% of Area Median Income At extremely low incomes, 69% of households in Collier County experience a severe housing problem (7,595 households). About two- thirds of Whites have a severe housing need (65%), as do 76% of African Americans and 74% of Hispanics. Asian households face severe housing problems at a disproportionately greater rate (92% or 44 households). Severe Housing Problems* Has one or more of four housing problems Has none of the four housing problems Household has no/negative income, but none of the other housing problems Jurisdiction as a whole 7,595 1,955 1,454 White 4,270 1,180 1,114 Black / African American 915 154 130 Asian 44 0 4 American Indian, Alaska Native 8 4 4 Pacific Islander 0 0 0 Other 48 17 2 Hispanic 2,310 600 200 Table 16 – Severe Housing Problems 0 - 30% AMI Data Source: 2011-2015 CHAS *The four severe housing problems are: 1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities, 2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities, 3. More than 1.5 persons per room, 4. Cost Burden over 50% 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 286 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 61 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) 30%-50% of Area Median Income At very low incomes (30-50% AMI), 46% or 6,105 Collier County households have a severe housing problem. Whites (44%) and Hispanics (49%) face severe housing problems at rates relatively close to that of the County. African Americans have a disproportionately high rate of severe housing needs – 58% of the 1,285 households have one or more severe housing needs. Severe Housing Problems* Has one or more of four housing problems Has none of the four housing problems Household has no/negative income, but none of the other housing problems Jurisdiction as a whole 6,105 6,975 0 White 3,230 4,185 0 Black / African American 740 545 0 Asian 0 55 0 American Indian, Alaska Native 0 14 0 Pacific Islander 0 0 0 Other 36 1 0 Hispanic 2,099 2,175 0 Table 17 – Severe Housing Problems 30 - 50% AMI Data Source: 2011-2015 CHAS *The four severe housing problems are: 1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities, 2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities, 3. More than 1.5 persons per room, 4. Cost Burden over 50% 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 287 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 62 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) 50%-80% of Area Median Income At 50-80% AMI, 21% of low-income households have one or more severe housing needs (4,389 households). At this income level, two racial/ethnic groups have disproportionately high rates of severe housing needs: African Americans (39% or 409 households) and Asians (77% or 1,060 households). Severe Housing Problems* Has one or more of four housing problems Has none of the four housing problems Household has no/negative income, but none of the other housing problems Jurisdiction as a whole 4,389 16,385 0 White 2,720 11,719 0 Black / African American 409 639 0 Asian 174 50 0 American Indian, Alaska Native 0 19 0 Pacific Islander 0 0 0 Other 26 93 0 Hispanic 1,060 3,865 0 Table 18 – Severe Housing Problems 50 - 80% AMI Data Source: 2011-2015 CHAS *The four severe housing problems are: 1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities, 2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities, 3. More than 1.5 persons per room, 4. Cost Burden over 50% 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 288 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 63 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) 80%-100% of Area Median Income At middle incomes, 14% or 1,645 households have a severe housing problem. African Americans have a disproportionately high rate of severe housing needs (23% or 1,080 households). Severe Housing Problems* Has one or more of four housing problems Has none of the four housing problems Household has no/negative income, but none of the other housing problems Jurisdiction as a whole 1,645 10,049 0 White 1,080 6,999 0 Black / African American 169 575 0 Asian 4 90 0 American Indian, Alaska Native 4 59 0 Pacific Islander 0 0 0 Other 3 91 0 Hispanic 385 2,235 0 Table 19 – Severe Housing Problems 80 - 100% AMI Data Source: 2011-2015 CHAS *The four severe housing problems are: 1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities, 2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities, 3. More than 1.5 persons per room, 4. Cost Burden over 50% 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 289 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 64 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Discussion Overall, severe housing problems are most acute at lower income levels. A little over two-thirds (69%) of Collier County households with incomes below 30% AMI face a severe need, as do 69% in the 30-50% AMI income range. As incomes increase, rates of severe housing problems lessen, dropping to 21% at the 50-80% AMI income level and 14% at the 80-100% AMI level. African American households face disproportionately high rate of severe housing needs at three income levels: low, moderate, and middle incomes. Asians are disproportionately affected by severe housing needs at the very low and moderate level incomes. NA-25 Disproportionately Greater Need: Housing Cost Burdens – 91.205 (b)(2) Assess the need of any racial or ethnic group that has disproportionately greater need in comparison to the needs of that category of need as a whole. Introduction: Per HUD definitions, a “disproportionate need” exists when any group has a housing need that is 10% or higher than the jurisdiction as a whole. A household is considered cost burdened when they are paying more than 30% of their income towards housing costs, including utilities. This section analyzes the extent of cost burden and identifies populations that are disproportionately affected. Housing Cost Burden Housing Cost Burden <=30% 30-50% >50% No / negative income (not computed) Jurisdiction as a whole 71,165 21,060 17,399 1,485 White 57,740 13,975 11,925 1,130 Black / African American 2,209 1,345 1,299 130 Asian 545 165 214 4 American Indian, Alaska Native 145 14 8 4 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 290 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 65 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Housing Cost Burden <=30% 30-50% >50% No / negative income (not computed) Pacific Islander 0 0 0 0 Other 552 71 114 2 Hispanic 9,974 5,490 3,839 215 Table 20 – Greater Need: Housing Cost Burdens AMI Data Source: 2011-2015 CHAS Discussion: According to Table 20, 19% of households in Collier County spend 30-50% of their income on housing-related costs. African American and Latino households are more likely to spend within this range when compared to the jurisdiction overall (26% and 28%, respectively). No racial or ethnic group is disproportionately likely to fall within this category. Severely cost burdened households (i.e., households spending more than 50% of their income on housing) account for 16% of Collier County households, an estimated 17,399 households county wide. Rates of severe cost burdening by race and ethnicity range from 18% for Whites to 30% for African Americans, not including Pacific Islander households, of whom zero face severe cost burdens. African Americans are the only group to face a disproportionately high rate of severe cost burdening (30% versus 16% for the jurisdiction as a whole). Combining the 30-50% and over 50% cost ranges shows that there is a total of 48,049 cost burdened households in Collier County, which constitutes 35% of the county’s total households. By race and ethnicity, rates of cost burdening range from 13% for American Indians/Alaska Natives to 53% for African Americans. Two groups are disproportionately likely to be cost burdened: African Americans (53% or 2,644 households) and Hispanics (48% or 9,329 households). 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 291 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 66 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) NA-30 Disproportionately Greater Need: Discussion – 91.205(b)(2) Are there any Income categories in which a racial or ethnic group has disproportionately greater need than the needs of that income category as a whole? The data in the Disproportionately Greater Need section of this document (NA-15 through NA-25) reflects that there are certain races and/or ethnicities that experience housing problems and cost burden at disproportionately higher rates as compared to all households within their same income bracket. This does not imply that explicit/overt policies or actions are being taken to create a market where minorities are not able to afford a quality home or a home at all. What the data in sections Needs Assessment -15 and -20 above more so reflect is the discrepancy in household income of minority populations as compared to the city as a whole. This discrepancy could be caused by a wide range of variables, but in any case, the end result is that a large number of minority households across all income brackets experience housing problems and/or cost burden at rates higher than their non-minority neighbors. Tables 12 through 20 identify several instances of disproportionately greater need, which are summarized below: 1. Housing Problems - At moderate incomes (50-80% AMI), African Americans and Asians face a disproportionate need (67% and 86%, respectively, compared to 53% for the jurisdiction as a whole. Finally, at middle incomes, no group has a disproportionately greater need than the jurisdiction as a whole. 2. Severe Housing Problems – African American households face disproportionately high rate of severe housing needs at three income levels: low, moderate, and middle incomes. Asians are disproportionately affected by severe housing needs at the very low and moderate level incomes. 3. Housing Cost Burdens - Two groups are disproportionately likely to be cost burdened: African Americans (53% or 2,644 households) and Hispanics (48% or 9,329 households). If they have needs not identified above, what are those needs? There is a need for greater distribution of affordable housing across all areas of the County. The primary housing-related needs are identified above and are reflected through the high number of households experiencing cost burden. An extremely low vacancy rate allows landlords, understanding that rental units will not stay vacant long, greater control. This very tight housing market disproportionately impacts low- and moderate-income households as a tight market has contributed to an increasingly expensive one. As rates increase, the portion of housing units on the market for low- and moderate-income residents becomes smaller and smaller. Compounding this, as noted above, minority households often earn less than white households. As minority households earn less and 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 292 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 67 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) have fewer options for rental units, these low- and moderate-income minority populations are vulnerable to landlord-tenant disputes or discrimination in searching for a unit to rent or purchase. Are any of those racial or ethnic groups located in specific areas or neighborhoods in your community? According to the 2010 Census, Collier County’s minority population (including African American, Latino, Asian, Pacific Islander, and Native American/Alaska Native residents) is most heavily concentrated in five census tracts in the Immokalee area, where minority residents constitute over 90% of the population. The majority of the residents in these tracts are Latino, and the second largest share are African American. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 293 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 68 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Ethnicity by Low-Income Census Tracts https://egis.hud.gov/cpdmaps/ Six other tracts have minority population shares above 50%. They include four tracts in Golden Gate, one in Naples Manor, and one in Naples near the Gordon River Apartments. In the census tract that includes the Gordon River Apartments, the majority of residents are African American; in the remaining tracts, Latinos make up the largest share. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 294 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 69 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) In summary, the African American and Latino Census Block maps display unique challenges faced by the segregated living patterns in Immokalee and Golden Gate and Naples Manor, that are also in transition. The unique challenges should be considered in examining strategies to invest and preserve neighborhoods, while also fostering more inclusive choices of housing county wide. NA-35 Public Housing – 91.205(b) Introduction The Collier County Housing Authority (CCHA) is an independent authority established under state law and is separate from the general control of the County. The mission of the CCHA is to offer a choice of decent safe and diverse affordable housing, with opportunity for low- income households to achieve economic independence in living environments free from discrimination. The Authority fulfills this mission by offering a variety of subsidized housing options to low-income residents of Collier County. The CCHA owns and manages four public housing developments: 276 units of low-income housing in Farm Worker Village, 315 units of farm labor housing also in Farm Worker Village, 30 units of farm labor housing known as Collier Village and a 192-bed dormitory known as Horizon Village. In addition, the Authority serves an estimated 3100 plus people through the administration of the Section 8 rental assistance program and Family Self Sufficiency Program to provide support services targeted to low, elderly, disabled and homeless that live in Collier County. The Housing Authority also administers approximately 4 Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers. Unlike most public housing authorities, CCHA has no HUD-funded public housing units. Their primary funding is from The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 295 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 70 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Totals in Use Program Type Certificate Mod- Rehab Public Housing Vouchers Total Project - based Tenant - based Special Purpose Voucher Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing Family Unification Program Disabled * # of units vouchers in use 0 0 0 440 0 438 1 1 0 Table 21 - Public Housing by Program Type *includes Non-Elderly Disabled, Mainstream One-Year, Mainstream Five-year, and Nursing Home Transition Data Source: PIC (PIH Information Center) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 296 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 71 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Characteristics of Residents Program Type Certificate Mod- Rehab Public Housing Vouchers Total Project - based Tenant - based Special Purpose Voucher Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing Family Unification Program Average Annual Income 0 0 0 12,798 0 12,791 17,509 11,088 Average length of stay 0 0 0 6 0 6 1 8 Average Household size 0 0 0 2 0 2 3 1 # Homeless at admission 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 # of Elderly Program Participants (>62) 0 0 0 161 0 160 0 1 # of Disabled Families 0 0 0 105 0 104 1 0 # of Families requesting accessibility features 0 0 0 440 0 438 1 1 # of HIV/AIDS program participants 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 # of DV victims 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 297 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 72 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Table 22 – Characteristics of Public Housing Residents by Program Type Data Source: PIC (PIH Information Center) Race of Residents Program Type Race Certificate Mod- Rehab Public Housing Vouchers Total Project - based Tenant - based Special Purpose Voucher Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing Family Unification Program Disabled * White 0 0 0 276 0 274 1 1 0 Black/African American 0 0 0 162 0 162 0 0 0 Asian 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 American Indian/Alaska Native 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 Pacific Islander 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 *includes Non-Elderly Disabled, Mainstream One-Year, Mainstream Five-year, and Nursing Home Transition Table 23 – Race of Public Housing Residents by Program Type 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 298 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 73 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Data Source: PIC (PIH Information Center) Ethnicity of Residents Program Type Ethnicity Certificate Mod- Rehab Public Housing Vouchers Total Project - based Tenant - based Special Purpose Voucher Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing Family Unification Program Disabled * Hispanic 0 0 0 176 0 176 0 0 0 Not Hispanic 0 0 0 264 0 262 1 1 0 *includes Non-Elderly Disabled, Mainstream One-Year, Mainstream Five-year, and Nursing Home Transition Table 24 – Ethnicity of Public Housing Residents by Program Type Data Source: PIC (PIH Information Center) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 299 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 74 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Section 504 Needs Assessment: Describe the needs of public housing tenants and applicants on the waiting list for accessible units: Of the CCHA’s 440 Housing Choice Voucher holders, 105 (24%) were disabled and 161 (37%) were over the age of 62 according to the HUD PIC data displayed in the tables above. These resident characteristics indicate a significant need for accessible housing units. When interviewed for input related to this plan, CCHA staff underscored this need, characterizing the existing housing stock in the County as having very few accessible units. Another need of people with disabilities who may be CCHA residents or on the waiting list is transportation. Enhanced paratransit and regular bus service would assist these residents in being better able to access services. Most immediate needs of residents of Public Housing and Housing Choice voucher holders The most immediate needs of CCHA’s clients are for more affordable housing options, transportation, and childcare. Despite the Housing Choice Vouchers and farmworker housing available through CCHA, there are approximately 1,000 applicants on the voucher waiting list and the list is closed. Rents in the private market are increasing and vouchers cannot keep pace, causing even those with vouchers to have difficulty finding affordable housing. Transportation, both paratransit and regular bus service is an additional need. Routes and hours are limited, making it difficult for voucher holders to access or maintain employment. There are a few programs in the area that provide assistance with the cost of childcare, which is necessary for parents of young children who need to work or look for work. These existing programs work well but cannot meet the high level of need. How do these needs compare to the housing needs of the population at large? The needs of public housing residents and housing choice voucher holders are largely consistent with the needs of the low- and moderate-income population at large. In the general population, tenants are concerned about the quality and affordability of their existing housing. Without the housing subsidies and other supports provided by CCHA, some of the affordability issues faced by the general population are even more acute. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 300 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 75 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) NA-40 Homeless Needs Assessment – 91.205(c)Introduction: A variety of housing and shelter models are available within the community including emergency shelter (ES), transitional housing (TH), permanent supportive housing (PSH), rapid re-housing (RRH).: This section provides an assessment of Collier County’s homeless population and their needs. Data is provided by the Hunger and Homeless Coalition’s 2021 Point in Time Counts (PITC) of sheltered and unsheltered homeless persons in Collier County. If data is not available for the categories "number of persons becoming and exiting homelessness each year," and "number of days that persons experience homelessness," describe these categories for each homeless population type (including chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth): The Collier County Hunger and Homeless Coalition conducts an annual Point-in-Time Count of homeless persons in Collier County in January of each year. Volunteers for the count included members of the civic and business community, homeless and formerly homeless individuals, and CoC member agency staff. Volunteers attended a training session prior to the count. The table that follows provides the results of the Hunger and Homeless Coalition’s 2021 Point-in-Time Count. As shown, there were 568 homeless persons counted in 2021. In 2021, veterans constituted 5.6% (34 persons), up slightly (29 persons) from the prior year. As of 2021, the largest share of homeless persons was either persons with chronic substance abuse issues (34.85%), individuals with serious mental illness (29.75%), victims of domestic violence (21.47%), and seniors made up 8.6% of the homeless population. These numbers are indicative of a need for housing with supportive services for both persons with disabilities and persons with substance abuse issues. Youth made up a significant share of Collier County’s homeless population. According to the 2021 point-in-time count, on the night of the count, 19.19% or 48 households with 109 children were homeless. Of these 109 children, 53 were in emergency shelter, 44 were in transitional shelter and 12 were unsheltered., which was 21% in 2020. In addition to the Point-in-Time Counts, homeless youth are also counted by the public schools’ liaison for homeless education, who reported serving 805 homeless students. In addition to children who met HUD’s definition of homeless, this count also includes children in families doubling-up with another household, unaccompanied youth staying with friends or family, and children awaiting foster care placement. A person is considered “chronically homeless” when they experience homelessness for a period of 12 consecutive months, or experience four episodes of homelessness within the past three years that total 12 or more months and have a long-term disability. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 301 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 76 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Patterns of homelessness reflect those who are unable to self-resolve their homelessness, are experiencing chronic homelessness, and who are not being adequately served by existing homeless system resources and capacity. Data was not available for 2021, but prior year data was used to draw comparisons of chronic homelessness and to portray a snapshot of this issue within the County. The number of chronically homeless people decreased from 88 in 2019 to 80 in 2020. As a share of the total homeless population, chronically homeless persons decreased from previous years in which the share fluctuated from increased. Address coordinated assessment Coordinated Entry is a streamlined system designed to efficiently match people experiencing homelessness or those at-risk of homelessness to available housing, shelter, and services. It prioritizes those who are most in need of assistance and provides crucial information that helps the Continuum of Care strategically allocate resources. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 302 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 77 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Nature and Extent of Homelessness 2020 Point-in-Time Count 2021 Point-in-Time Count Number Counted Share of Total Number Counted Share of Total Total 603 100% 568 100% HOMELESS STATUS Emergency Shelter 252 42% 245 43.13% Transitional Housing 183 30% 179 31.54% Unsheltered 168 28% 144 25.35% SUBPOPULATIONS Veterans 29 5% 34 5.98% Seniors (over 62) 47 8% 49 8.62% Chronically Homeless 80 13% Data Not Available Data Not Available Serious Mental Illness 127 21% 169 29.75% Chronic Substance Abuse 155 26% 198 34.85% HIV/AIDS 2 0% Data Not Available Data Not Available Victims of Domestic Violence 95 16% 122 21.47% CHILDREN AND YOUTH Children in Families 121 20% 109 19.19% Unaccompanied Youth 7 1% 183 32.21% Homeless Students 1039 N/A 805 N/A Data Source: Hunger & Homeless Coalition of Collier County; Point-in-Time Count 2020 and Point-in-Time Count 2021 Estimate the number and type of families in need of housing assistance for families with children and the families of veterans. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 303 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 78 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) While the Point-in-Time Counts did not include the number of families with children in need of housing assistance, the 2021 count did record the number of children living in homeless families. According to the 2021 Point-in-Time Count, 109 children (under 18) were homeless, which represents 19.19% of the total homeless population counted. There were 34 or 5.98% of homeless veterans were counted. Describe the Nature and Extent of Homelessness by Racial and Ethnic Group. Race and Ethnicity data was not available for the most recent point-in-time count conducted in 2021. The most recent data available on race and ethnicity was reported in the in the 2020 CoC Homeless Assistance Programs Homeless Populations and Subpopulations Report. The report shows that in 2020 there was a total of 603 homeless persons of which 475 were White, 85 were black, 23 were Multi-racial, 6 were Asian, and 14 were American Indian or Alaska Native. The data also revealed that there were 54 Hispanic/Latino persons who were homeless. Describe the Nature and Extent of Unsheltered and Sheltered Homelessness. As of the 2021 count, a large majority of Collier County’s homeless population was sheltered (74.67%), with 25.35% unsheltered. Of the sheltered population, most (43.13%) were in an emergency shelter. These percentages were increases from the 2021 point-in-count numbers for shelter and unsheltered individuals. NA-45 Non-Homeless Special Needs Assessment - 91.205 (b, d) Introduction: Non-homeless special needs characteristics describe the various subpopulations of Collier County who are not homeless but may require supportive services, including. • elderly, • frail elderly, • persons with disabilities (mental, physical, developmental), • persons with HIV/AIDS, • persons with alcohol or drug addiction, • victims of domestic violence, • persons with a criminal record, • those who have limited English proficiency, • and those who are transportation disadvantaged. Persons belonging to this population may have additional needs before, during, and after an incident in functional areas including but not limited to maintaining independence, communication, transportation, supervision, and medical care. The section below will describe why identifying the characteristics and needs of these sub-populations is essential to the planning process for these federal dollars. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 304 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 79 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Describe the characteristics of special needs populations in your community: Both the elderly and persons with disabilities have difficulties in finding accessible and affordable housing. In addition to housing, these populations are challenged to find transportation and other supportive services. Persons with alcohol and other drug addiction problems often have difficulty finding resources and treatment facilities including the lack of a central point reference for persons seeking assistance. Persons living with HIV/AIDS are more likely to have income instability because of their medical condition and this can lead to the increased likelihood of homelessness. The needs of victims of domestic violence can vary to include shelter, transitional, and long-term housing, medical, counseling, and legal services. What are the housing and supportive service needs of these populations and how are these needs determined? The primary housing and supportive needs of these subpopulations (the elderly, frail elderly, persons with disabilities, persons with HIV/AIDS and their families, persons with alcohol or drug addiction, victims of domestic violence, and persons with a criminal record and their families) were determined by input from both service providers and the public through the survey, public meetings, and stakeholder interviews. These needs include affordable, safe housing opportunities in areas with access to transportation and paratransit, commercial and job centers, and social services including counseling, case management, and subsidies for childcare, and for education regarding fair housing rights and actions that can be taken in the event those rights are violated. Persons with disabilities often require accessible features and ground floor housing units and use of supportive/therapeutic animals. Victims of domestic violence need safe housing, removal of barriers to relocation, and protection from perpetrators. Persons with criminal records and their families may be disqualified from public housing or Section 8 rental assistance, and accordingly, assistance with housing for low-income members of this subpopulation must be provided by other nongovernmental organizations. Interviews with stakeholders and residents indicated that residents with alcohol and substance abuse histories, as well as victims of domestic violence may have criminal records. While the scope of supportive services varies based upon an individual’s characteristics, the following is a list of services commonly needed by non-homeless people with special needs. These services may be provided either on- or off-site: Accessible Housing Crisis Hotline Health Care Advocacy, referral, information Education Legal Assistance Case Management Employment Training Childcare Family & Caregiver Support 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 305 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 80 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Counseling Financial assistance Discuss the size and characteristics of the population with HIV/AIDS and their families within the Eligible Metropolitan Statistical Area: Knowing how many people diagnosed with HIV infection each year, and their stage of disease at diagnosis, is important for planning and resource allocation and for monitoring trends and disparities between groups. Similarly, monitoring HIV incidence is critical for allocating resources and evaluating the effectiveness of HIV testing and other prevention programs. Improved surveillance methods allow resources to be better directed for programs and resources to the populations most affected. According to the Florida Department of Health, there were 263 persons with HIV (PWH) compared to the state of Florida at 548.6 for all modes of exposure and age groups. The rate of diagnosis for the County was 9.8 compared to 21.6 for the state of Florida for all modes of exposure and age groups. NA-50 Non-Housing Community Development Needs – 91.215 (f) Describe the jurisdiction’s need for Public Facilities: The top needs for public facilities in Collier County include the need for: • drainage improvements, • sewer improvements, • street improvements, • and water system improvements, • as senior centers, • youth centers • libraries Residents described that Collier County has put in sufficient efforts to ensure that there are equal resources like parks, public safety facilities, and recreational facilities throughout the County. The Needs Assessment included public facilities and improvements that are eligible for CDBG grant funding: facilities that principally serve low- and moderate-income residents or are located in low- and moderate-income neighborhoods. Although not limited to these needs, the following were identified as needs in the jurisdictions through focus groups and community and agency surveys: • Improving facilities for human service agencies • Increasing development of childcare facilities • Improving substandard or deteriorated properties • Making improvements to public infrastructure (streets, curbs, sewer, and stormwater systems) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 306 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 81 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Both the resident survey and the open house survey identified the need to support the acquisition and improvement of human service agency facilities as the highest priority need. This priority was also supported during stakeholder meetings. How were these needs determined? Public facilities needs were identified through a community assessment survey distributed to the public and a virtual public needs assessment meeting held during a virtual public meeting. Other resources consulted were prior plans and progress reports from Collier County. Describe the jurisdiction’s need for Public Improvements: Demolition or redevelopment of blighted properties was seen by Collier County residents as an important need. Additionally, the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) has undertaken several subarea studies of bicycle and pedestrian mobility in communities throughout the County. Though only a few individual communities have been studied to date, the MPO reports have indicated significant needs for sidewalks, bike lanes, and pedestrian safety improvements. For example, in Naples Manor, the MPO report graded the community with an overall level of service of D. of 31 streets in the community, only one had sidewalks on both sides of the road. The proximity of Lely High School and Parkside Elementary School to the area heighten the need for public improvements. Improved street lighting and the addition of street furniture, such as benches and signs, was often a frequent recommendation as well. Similar findings were contained in a separate MPO report on the Immokalee area. How were these needs determined? Public improvement needs were identified through a community assessment survey distributed to the public and a virtual public needs assessment meeting held during a virtual public meeting. Other resources consulted were prior plans and progress reports from Collier County. Describe the jurisdiction’s need for Public Services: Survey respondents identified the following public services as high needs: need for social services for low-income seniors, youth, mentally and physically disabled persons. a) Rental Assistance - Tenant subsidies exclusively for rental payments for eligible clients. These services could financial assistance to pay rent or utilities. b) Senior Services – Services that are exclusively provided for elderly persons with or without disabilities provided it is intended primarily to serve elderly. These services could include case management for staff working primarily with the elderly. c) Youth Services - Services that are exclusively provided for young people aged 13 to 19. For example, recreational services limited to teenagers and teen counseling programs. d) Childcare Services - Services that will benefit children (generally under age 13), including parenting skills classes. e) Services for Mentally Ill - Services addressing the mental health needs of residents of the community. These services could include case management for staff working primarily with the persons with mental illness. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 307 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 82 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) f) Services for Physically Disabled - Services for the persons with disabilities, regardless of age. These services could include case management for staff working primarily with the persons with physical disabilities. How were these needs determined? Public services needs were identified through a community assessment survey distributed to the public and a virtual public needs assessment meeting held during a virtual public meeting. Other resources consulted were prior plans and progress reports from Collier County. Housing Market Analysis MA-05 Overview Housing Market Analysis Overview: The housing market analysis contained in this report was developed by using primarily using data from the American Community Survey, CHAS, and other sources noted in the tables. The following information is based on the Census' American Community Survey 2011-2015. Numbers shown represent the Collier County. The total number of housing structures shown in the "All Residential Properties by Number of Units" table includes mobile homes and recreational vehicles, some of which may not be considered housing units by HUD. Of the 163,293 units in the County, 46% consist of two or more bedrooms. One-bedroom units are the smallest category of housing units. The rest is divided into single unit attached structures and multiple unit apartment buildings. While housing opportunities can be limited by household income and purchasing power, the lack of affordable housing options can result in a significant hardship for low-income households, preventing them from meeting other basic needs. Low-income residents often have fewer financial resources available for making monthly rent or mortgage payments. Those low-income residents who do choose to purchase a home must keep even more funds available for taxes, insurance, homeowners association fees, and home maintenance and repairs. Because home ownership requires significant investment for most residents, many low- and moderate-income households choose to rent their homes as opposed to purchasing one. Under most residential property leases, this option calls for less responsibility and less investment from the home occupant than if they were to purchase a home. MA-10 Number of Housing Units – 91.210(a)&(b)(2) Introduction This section explores the number and types of housing units in Collier County and whether or not the number of available units is sufficient to meet housing demand for the County. Data provided by the 2011-2015 ACS, as shown in Table 26, reveals 48% of the County’s housing stock was of single-family configuration with attached and detached unit structures. Of the 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 308 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 83 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) 163,293 units in the County, 46% consist of two or more bedrooms. One-bedroom units are the smallest category of housing units. All residential properties by number of units Property Type Number % 1-unit detached structure 68,315 42% 1-unit, attached structure 9,645 6% 2-4 units 19,295 12% 5-19 units 35,720 22% 20 or more units 19,648 12% Mobile Home, boat, RV, van, etc 10,670 7% Total 163,293 100% Table 25 – Residential Properties by Unit Number Data Source: 2011-2015 ACS Unit Size by Tenure Owners Renters Number % Number % No bedroom 170 0% 820 2% 1 bedroom 1,360 2% 4,425 13% 2 bedrooms 25,750 33% 15,680 48% 3 or more bedrooms 50,923 65% 12,022 37% Total 78,203 100% 32,947 100% Table 26 – Unit Size by Tenure Data Source: 2011-2015 ACS 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 309 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 84 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Describe the number and targeting (income level/type of family served) of units assisted with federal, state, and local programs. The County administers a variety of housing programs to assist low- and moderate-income residents to afford and maintain housing. These are funded primarily through federal Community Development Block Grant and the HOME Investment Partnerships programs, through which the County utilizes public funds to address the priority needs and specific objectives identified in the Consolidated Plan. The lack of affordable housing in the County is a major obstacle for residents. This lack of affordable housing particularly affects low- and moderate-income households, seniors, people with disabilities, single head of households, and young adults. To foster the development of affordable housing, the County utilizes HOME resources to expand housing opportunities. Provide an assessment of units expected to be lost from the affordable housing inventory for any reason, such as expiration of Section 8 contracts. There are no anticipated losses of affordable housing inventory. Some affordable housing units have been lost due to the vast changes in the housing market. Homes lost to foreclosure or those that are short sold may be acquired by a bank or investor. Many times, these are resold with no homebuyer assistance or for rental properties, so the owner-occupied market has changed as a result. This makes affordable homeowner units a scarcity. At this time, none of the publicly funded and assisted units are anticipated to be lost during the 5-year Consolidated Plan period extending through 2021. Does the availability of housing units meet the needs of the population? Consultations with housing service providers and community meetings revealed that there remains a need for one-bedroom units for individuals exiting homelessness as well as two- and three-bedroom apartments for very low and extremely low-income families. Describe the need for specific types of housing: There is a need for safe, sanitary, accessible, and affordable housing throughout the County. Specifically, there is a strong need for housing affordable to households earning less than 50% of the median income, and practical options are needed to ensure the availability of accessible units for the elderly and people with physical disabilities. The type of housing that is needed, includes varied options, whether those be single family detached or multifamily units, are needed to meet the demands of the population as well as to address the forecasted growth. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 310 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 85 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) MA-15 Housing Market Analysis: Cost of Housing - 91.210(a) Introduction The following tables reflect the cost of both owner and renter-occupied housing in Collier County. These tables use 2011-2015 ACS data from HUD’s eCon Software. There have been significant changes in housing prices in recent years which are not fully captured in this data and will be discussed at the end of this section. In Collier, the 2020 Fair Market Rent (FMR) for a two-bedroom apartment was $1,381. In order to afford this level of rent and utilities, without paying more than 30% of income on housing, a household must earn $4,603 monthly or $55,240 annually. Assuming a 40-hour work week, 52 weeks per year, a resident must work at least 124 hours per week at minimum wage to afford a two-bedroom unit. The monthly rent affordable at minimum wage for a 40-hour work week in the County is $406, less than half of the actual Fair Market Rent. The table reflecting the amount of rent paid by residents of the County demonstrates that 49.7% of rental units rent for between $500 and $999 per month, while 14.1% of rental units rent for less than $500 per month. The Housing Affordability table also shows that there were 1,275 units available to households earning below 30% of the county’s HUD Area Median Family Income (HAMFI). Cost of Housing Base 2015 2019 % Change Median Home Value $315,000 $370,800 17.7% Median Contract Rent $1,177 $1,397 18.6% Table 27 – Cost of Housing Data Source: 2005-2009 ACS (Base Year), 2015-2019 ACS (Most Recent Year) 2019 Rent Paid Number % Less than $500 1,576 4.5% $500-999 5,085 14.4% $1,000-1,499 14,317 40.5% $1,500-1,999 9,694 27.4% $2,000 or more 4,692 13.2 Total 33,788 100% 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 311 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 86 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Table 28 - Rent Paid Data Source: 2015-2019 ACS Housing Affordability % Units affordable to Households earning Renter Owner 30% HAMFI 1,275 No Data 50% HAMFI 4,455 5,350 80% HAMFI 18,220 15,901 100% HAMFI No Data 23,541 Total 23,950 44,792 Table 29 – Housing Affordability Data Source: 2011-2015 CHAS Monthly Rent Monthly Rent ($) Efficiency (no bedroom) 1 Bedroom 2 Bedroom 3 Bedroom 4 Bedroom Fair Market Rent 900 1,126 1,381 1,812 2,026 High HOME Rent 900 983 1,182 1,357 1,495 Low HOME Rent 721 772 926 1,070 1,193 Table 30 – Monthly Rent Data Source: HUD FMR and HOME Rents, 2020 Is there sufficient housing for households at all income levels? There is not a sufficient supply for low- and moderate-income households in Collier County. This is evident through cost burden data that considers median household income as compared to median rental rates and home values. A significant lack of affordable housing exists particularly for the approximately one in four households that are at the low or very-low-income levels. The 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 312 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 87 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) table above shows that there is insufficient housing for extremely low- and low-income households in the County. Based on 2019 ACS data there are an estimated 6,273 very-low- income households in Collier, but only 1,275 affordable rental units at 30% HAMFI. Collier County conducts an apartment study quarterly to look at pricing trends and needs. Additionally, the County also produces a housing demand model annually to keep a pulse on the number of units needs within the County. Below is a snapshot of the report. How is affordability of housing likely to change considering changes to home values and/or rents? Affordability in Collier County has decreased because the cost of housing continues to increase and the availability of land decreases. According to Zillow (2021), the typical home value of homes in Collier County is $381,207. This value is seasonally adjusted and only includes the middle price tier of homes. When compared to the 2019 ACS estimates, the County’s median value was $370,800, which is a 2.8% increase. According to the National Low Income Housing Coalition’s 2020 Out of Reach Report, the County’s Fair Market Rent for a two-bedroom was $1,381 when compared to the 2019 ACS estimates the median rent was $1,397, which is a slight decrease of 1.14%. Another compounding factor adversely affecting affordability is unit vacancy rate. According to the 2019 ACS, the rental unit vacancy rate for Collier County was 7.1% while the owner-occupied unit vacancy rate was 3.5%. It should be noted that production of new units became available in the high-end rental market which could cause the vacancy rate to trend higher than normal overall, but the vacancy rate in the low-income rental market is less 3% according to the Quarterly Apartment Survey, conducted by Community and Human Services staff. How do HOME rents / Fair Market Rent compare to Area Median Rent? How might this impact your strategy to produce or preserve affordable housing? As actual rental rates have continued to rise, they are outpacing the HUD-established fair market rents (FMRs). The FMR and HOME high rents are substantially below the 2019 median rental 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 313 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 88 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) rates as reported by Zillow. As reflected in the following charts, the 2020 High HOME rents and Fair Market Rents for efficiencies, one-, two-, and three-bedroom units in the Naples-Immokalee- Marco Island, Florida MSA are the similar as the Area Median Rent, and comparable for four- bedroom units. However, as detailed above, housing costs in the County are increasing at higher rates than incomes. As housing construction and rehabilitation costs rise, it will be increasingly difficult to produce much needed affordable housing. Rent Reasonableness allows Collier County to provide housing for units up to 10% over the Fair Market Rent rate. HOME Rent Limits Discussion As housing costs continue to rise, so does the demand for housing that is affordable to low- income households, particularly rental housing for the very low and extremely low-income households. The County will need to consider new and innovative ways to meet this demand. MA-20 Housing Market Analysis: Condition of Housing – 91.210(a) Introduction The age and condition of a county’s housing stock are important variables in assessing the overall characteristics of the local housing market. This section will review important data about the county’s housing stock. The older housing stock, particularly older rental housing often has code and deferred maintenance issues that can impact the longevity of the housing structure which in turn impacts the housing supply in terms of accessibility and affordability. Definitions 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 314 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 89 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Standard Condition: No major structural defects; adequate plumbing and kitchen facilities; appearance which does not create a blighting influence; and the house meets additional, more stringent, local standards and building codes, including lead-based paint clearance. Such units may be eligible for housing rehabilitation funding if interior conditions are such that the HUD Section 8 Housing Quality Standards or other standards are not met. Examples of ways in which the interiors of such homes might be rehabilitated include the replacement of heating systems, electrical system repairs or upgrades, plumbing system repairs or upgrades, energy efficiency improvements, and accessibility improvements. Substandard Condition but Suitable for Rehabilitation: This category describes dwelling units that do not meet standard conditions but that are both financially and structurally feasible for rehabilitation. Such units may be lacking complete plumbing or kitchen facilities and/or may have exterior elements in need of repair (e.g., a roof in need of replacement, siding in need of repair or replacement, or a missing/failing foundation), and the unit value must exceed the cost of the repairs or upgrades required to bring it to standard condition. Substandard Condition but Suitable for Rehabilitation: The nature of the substandard condition makes rehabilitation both financially and structurally feasible. Such units will typically have an improvement value that is less than the cost of addressing the habitability and exterior elements that cause its classification as “substandard,” or will be considered to be unoccupiable for reasons of safety by the county’s building official. Housing Conditions: Condition of units is assessed using the same criteria as in the Needs Assessment. This includes: 1) lacks complete plumbing facilities, 2) lacks complete kitchen facilities, 3) more than one person per room, 4) cost burden (amount of income allocated to housing) is greater than 30%, and 5) complies with applicable building code standards. Condition of Units Condition of Units Owner-Occupied Renter-Occupied Number % Number % With one selected Condition 22,585 29% 15,530 47% With two selected Conditions 839 1% 2,210 7% With three selected Conditions 25 0% 50 0% With four selected Conditions 0 0% 0 0% No selected Conditions 54,760 70% 15,135 46% Total 78,209 100% 32,925 100% Table 31 - Condition of Units 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 315 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 90 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Data Source: 2011-2015 ACS Year Unit Built Year Unit Built Owner-Occupied Renter-Occupied Number % Number % 2000 or later 25,049 32% 9,025 27% 1980-1999 40,975 52% 16,525 50% 1950-1979 11,674 15% 7,093 22% Before 1950 509 1% 277 1% Total 78,207 100% 32,920 100% Table 32 – Year Unit Built Data Source: 2011-2015 CHAS Risk of Lead-Based Paint Hazard Risk of Lead-Based Paint Hazard Owner-Occupied Renter-Occupied Number % Number % Total Number of Units Built Before 1980 12,183 16% 7,370 22% Housing Units build before 1980 with children present 10,416 13% 4,893 15% Table 33 – Risk of Lead-Based Paint Data Source: 2011-2015 ACS (Total Units) 2011-2015 CHAS (Units with Children present) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 316 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 91 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Vacant Units Suitable for Rehabilitation Not Suitable for Rehabilitation Total Vacant Units 0 0 81,711 Abandoned Vacant Units 0 0 0 REO Properties 0 0 0 Abandoned REO Properties 0 0 0 Table 34 - Vacant Units Need for Owner and Rental Rehabilitation The age of the housing stock in Collier County will continue to have a significant impact on general housing conditions in the area. The 2019 ACS data shows that only 16.73% of the county’s housing stock was built prior to 1970. Owner and renter households, especially those located in low-income target neighborhoods will be in need of rehabilitation assistance to maintain their homes. As housing ages, maintenance costs rise, which can present significant costs for low- and moderate- income homeowners. This also poses a threat to low- and moderate- income tenants who are not able to maintain close communications with their landlords or property managers who may be out of state when repairs are needed. Estimated Number of Housing Units Occupied by Low- or Moderate-Income Families with LBP Hazards Exposure to lead-based paint represents one of the most significant environmental threats from a housing perspective. Lead is a highly toxic metal that may cause a range of health problems for adults, and especially for children. The major source of lead exposure comes from lead- contaminated dust found in deteriorating buildings. Many residential properties built before 1978 contain lead-based paint. Unfortunately, measuring the exact number of housing units with lead-based paint hazards is difficult. HUD regulations regarding lead-based paint apply to all federally assisted housing. Low-income households that earn between 0-50% Median Family Income (MFI) are least able to afford well maintained housing and, therefore, are often at greater risk of lead poisoning. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 317 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 92 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) MA-25 Public and Assisted Housing – 91.210(b) Introduction Collier County Housing Authority (CCHA) provides housing assistance to low-income residents through the management of the areas Housing Choice Voucher Program - Section 8. This program is income based and the eligibility requirements are set by HUD. The CCHA has been committed to providing safe, decent, and affordable housing to low-income residents in Collier County since 1966. The CCHA administers a number of programs, such as the Far Worker Housing, the Housing Choice Voucher Program, and the Family Self-Sufficiency Program, to promote self-sufficiency and economic opportunity for local residents. The data tables presented in this section were pre-populated by the HUD eCon Planning Suite. In many instances, the data is either incorrect or out of date; however, no changes can be made. Where data were available, supplemental tables are provided. Totals Number of Units Program Type Certificate Mod- Rehab Public Housing Vouchers Total Project -based Tenant - based. Special Purpose Voucher Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing Family Unification Program Disabled * # of units vouchers available 0 0 0 440 0 0 0 0 0 # of accessible units 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 *includes Non-Elderly Disabled, Mainstream One-Year, Mainstream Five-year, and Nursing Home Transition Table 35 – Total Number of Units by Program Type Data Source: PIC (PIH Information Center) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 318 Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 93 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Describe the supply of public housing developments: The CCHA owns and manages four public housing developments: 276 units of low-income housing in Farm Worker Village, 315 units of farm labor housing also in Farm Worker Village, 30 units of farm labor housing known as Collier Village and a 192-bed dormitory known as Horizon Village. In addition, CCHA serves an over 3,100 persons through the administration of the Section 8 rental assistance program and Family Self Sufficiency Program to provide support services to low, elderly, disabled, and homeless persons living in Collier County. Describe the number and physical condition of public housing units in the jurisdiction, including those that are participating in an approved Public Housing Agency Plan: HUD's Real Estate Assessment Center conducts physical inspections of properties that are owned, insured, or subsidized by HUD, including public housing and multifamily assisted housing. However, because the public housing units in Collier County are funded by USDA and not HUD, they are neither inspected by the Real Estate Assessment Center nor are they covered by a Public Housing Agency Plan. The Housing Choice Vouchers are tenant-based and the properties at which the vouchers are used vary significantly in physical condition. Public Housing Condition Public Housing Development Average Inspection Score n/a n/a Table 36 - Public Housing Condition Describe the restoration and revitalization needs of public housing units in the jurisdiction: The CCHA was awarded a SHIP Rental Acquisition grant to buy properties in Naples to rent to low-income families. This project will be financed in part by the State Housing Initiative Program (SHIP) and the Collier County Community and Human Services Division. The CCHA has also applied for rehabilitation grant through the Collier County Community and Human Services Division to rehab older units. Additionally, the Housing Authority also receive money from the HOME and CDBG program to add HVAC units in Immokalee. Describe the public housing agency's strategy for improving the living environment of low- and moderate-income families residing in public housing: The CCHA also sponsors and supports self-sufficiency programs focused at helping their residents improve their economic situation and quality of living. The programs, ROSS and FSS, are voluntary self-sufficiency programs that provide participating families the opportunity to identify needs, improve skill sets, and work towards life goals, economic independence, and housing self- sufficiency programs provide families with: • A plan specifically tailored to their family or individual goals. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 319 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 94 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) • A link to community organizations geared towards education, job training and placement programs, computer and financial literacy, and increased self-sufficiency. • An advocate and supporter to help residents work through barriers preventing self- sufficiency. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 320 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 95 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) MA-30 Homeless Facilities and Services – 91.210(c) Introduction Collier County partners with the Hunger & Homeless Coalition of Collier County to address the needs of the homeless individuals and families or at risk of homelessness. There are multiple organizations providing services in Collier County, such as homeless assistance providers, victim service providers, nonprofit organizations, public housing agencies, mental health agencies and government-based organizations. The Hunger & Homeless Coalition of Collier Coalition is a working group whose mission is to “support the planning, delivery and coordination of high- quality services to the hungry, homeless, and those at risk of homelessness in our community.” The group also works to provide programs and services related to housing, mental and physical health, nutrition, clothing, and education. Data for the HUD-formatted table below was taken from the available information from the CoC that follows. Facilities and Housing Targeted to Homeless Households Emergency Shelter Beds Transitional Housing Beds Permanent Supportive Housing Beds Year- Round Beds (Current & New) Voucher / Seasonal / Overflow Beds Current & New Current & New Under Development Households with Adult(s) and Child(ren) 92 0 54 0 0 Households with Only Adults 140 0 132 30 0 Chronically Homeless Households 0 0 0 0 0 Veterans 0 0 0 0 0 Unaccompanied Youth 23 0 8 0 0 Table 37 - Facilities and Housing Targeted to Homeless Households Describe mainstream services, such as health, mental health, and employment services to the extent those services are used to complement services targeted to homeless persons 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 321 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 96 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Many social service agencies in Collier County provide benefits to homeless individuals and families to address homelessness. These services are essential to facilitate the process and serve the needs of those who have already become homeless. These organizations provide many services to their clientele, including but not limited to counseling, case management, life skills training, financial literacy classes, and victim advocacy, all of which help residents to develop the skills and knowledge to transition into permanent housing or independent living and to maintain steady employment. The goal of providing supportive services is self-sufficiency. While case management services do exist within programs, some stakeholders noted that tenancy supports are underfunded and are not available on the scale needed to serve people in PSH and RRH. Robust tenancy supports would improve housing-related outcomes across the system. Discussions are also ongoing regarding hiring FTE staff including case managers, licensed mental health case managers, peer specialist and licensed substance abuse case managers to coordinate services or provide onsite services. List and describe services and facilities that meet the needs of homeless persons, particularly chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth. If the services and facilities are listed on screen SP-40 Institutional Delivery Structure or screen MA-35 Special Needs Facilities and Services, describe how these facilities and services specifically address the needs of these populations. Collier County has a broad network of homeless providers offering emergency shelter, transitional housing, employment services, legal services, food, veteran’s services, medical services, financial assistance, eviction prevention services, and assistance with alcohol and drug dependency. The following agencies listed provide services specifically for homeless people: The Shelter for Abused Women and Children in Naples is the only domestic violence center in Naples. It includes emergency shelter (where stays average 29 days) and a transitional housing program (where residents can live for up to 2 years). Other services include a confidential hotline, safety planning, counseling and support groups in English and Spanish, court advocacy and assistance with daily needs such as food, clothing, toiletries, and household items. St. Matthew’s House operates several facilities in Collier County, including emergency and transitional housing in Naples, an emergency shelter in Immokalee (Immokalee Friendship House), and transitional supportive apartments for persons with substance abuse or mental health needs. Other services include a food pantry, thrift store, counseling and case management, and access to referrals for medical, mental health, and substance abuse needs through partnerships with other organizations in Collier County. The Salvation Army and St. Vincent De Paul provides financial assistance for food, shelter, and other aid to Collier County residents who meet certain income criteria. Youth Haven is a 24-hour residential shelter for children removed from their homes due to abuse, neglect, or abandonment. In addition to a 23-bed emergency shelter, Youth Haven offers a child 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 322 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 97 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) and family counseling center, in-home parenting classes, case management, and a teen drop-in center with showers, laundry facilities, and meals. Typical length of stays range from 45 to 60 days until children are placed in foster care or with a relative. Providence House provides a faith-based, transitional housing and self-sufficiency program for motivated women with young children who are homeless or at risk of being homeless. These women lack the long-term support necessary to acquire the assets foundational to re- establishing their families. The two-year accountability program not only encourages the development of self-efficacy, but it also provides women and their children with resources that they need to become independent. Providence House also offers case management, life skills training, and counseling referrals. Wounded Warriors assists with the needs of Veterans and their families, with the focus on education, housing, and mental health. The Hunger and Homeless Coalition of Collier County estimates that there are 80-90 homeless Veterans in Collier County. Wounded Warriors of Collier County is dedicated to ending Veteran homelessness in Collier County by employing various housing models. MA-35 Special Needs Facilities and Services – 91.210(d) Introduction This section describes the housing and social service needs of Collier County’s special populations including: • Elderly, • frail elderly, • domestic violence victims, • residents with diagnosis of HIV/AIDS, • residents with substance abuse, mental health, or disability diagnosis. The special needs population includes individuals having mobility impairments, disabilities, or that require supportive services. Typically, this population has a severe or persistent mental illness, development, and physical disabilities. Several organizations provide facilities and services for special needs populations in Collier County. Including the elderly, frail elderly, persons with disabilities (mental, physical, developmental), persons with alcohol or other drug addictions, persons with HIV/AIDS and their families, public housing residents and any other categories the jurisdiction may specify, and describe their supportive housing needs The supportive housing needs of Collier County’s special needs sub-populations (the elderly, frail elderly, persons with disabilities, persons with HIV/AIDS and their families, persons with alcohol 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 323 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 98 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) or drug addiction, victims of domestic violence, and persons with a criminal record and their families) mirrors the housing needs of the general population. Their needs include affordable and accessible housing opportunities, job centers, access to transportation, and most importantly to these subpopulations is social and supportive services to assist them in accessing programs available to them. Services for these populations include counseling, case management, ADL support, and education regarding fair housing rights and actions that can be taken in the event those rights are violated. Elderly and Frail Elderly - Much of the elderly population in Collier County need a range of community-based services, i.e., social, physical, mental health, case management, chronic disease management, supportive housing, and other services that assist people to remain living in the community. Community-based long term care services include in-home supportive services; home health care; adult day services; paratransit services; home-delivered meals; supportive services in a hotel; care in residential care facilities, including board and care and assisted living; and other health and social services. Long term care and supportive services can be provided in home and community-based settings, as well as in institutional settings, depending on need and choice. Collier County also has a comprehensive meals program that provides congregate, and home delivered meals. The case management services for seniors program also allows seniors to participate in the EHEAP for the elderly to help with electric services. Persons with Disabilities - Persons with disabilities often require accessible features and ground floor housing units and support animals. Available housing for this subpopulation is limited within Collier County, thus limiting housing choice. Units are available for this population; however, there is greater demand for units for people with chronic mental illness for units for people with physical or developmental disabilities. Funding from the State Housing Incentive Partnership (SHIP) programs allows Community Assisted & Supported Living (CASL) and ROOF Collier County to create supported living homes for adults with disabilities. Persons with Drug Addiction and Criminal Records may be disqualified from housing opportunities public housing or Section 8 rental assistance, and accordingly, assistance with housing for low-income members of this subpopulation must be provided by other nongovernmental organizations. Survivors of Domestic Violence need safe housing, removal of barriers to relocation, and protection from perpetrators. Housing providers need to be aware of and adhere to protocols outlined in the Violence Against Women’s Act. Persons with HIV/AIDS and their families supportive housing needs include housing developed with HOPWA funding and other dedicated resources. Persons living with HIV/AIDS often have medical concerns that can severely impact their ability to earn wages sufficient to maintain adequate housing. HOPWA funding is not received directly in Collier County. Public Housing Residents need supportive social services to aid families in becoming self- sufficient. These services include financial counseling, housing counseling, credit counseling, down-payment assistance programs, job training and placement, and access to transportation. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 324 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 99 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Describe programs for ensuring that persons returning from mental and physical health institutions receive appropriate supportive housing Public systems or institutions (i.e., jails, prisons, hospitals, child welfare, mental health facilities, etc.) often release individuals directly into homelessness. Supportive housing has been identified as one of the greatest needs for special needs subpopulations after being discharged from mental and physical health institutions. In Collier County, housing referrals are often made to the David Lawrence Center a nonprofit that owns and operates treatment programs and supportive housing for people with mental health and substance abuse disorders. Community members reported a need for community-living, group home type housing for those transitioning from inpatient care to more independent living situations. One such agency providing that service is Community Assisted & Supported Living (CASL). Specify the activities that the jurisdiction plans to undertake during the next year to address the housing and supportive services needs identified in accordance with 91.215(e) with respect to persons who are not homeless but have other special needs. Link to one-year goals. 91.315(e) Collier County will prioritize increasing the supply of affordable housing that includes supportive services for special needs subpopulations which include families with children, seniors, ex- offenders, people with HIV/AIDS, victims of domestic violence, people with drug and alcohol addictions, people who are evicted or foreclosed, people with physical and mental disabilities, veterans, youth and young adults, and youth aging out of foster care. The county will give preference to projects that are rich in amenities and opportunity to include proximity to grocery stores, public transportation, and job centers. Additionally, Collier County will continue to support programs that provide rental subsidies to low-income housing households to make existing units affordable; providing down payment assistance to eligible low and moderate- income homebuyers; and supporting community efforts to fund the affordable housing trust fund. However, there is not a consistent revenue stream to support funding the trust fund. Collier County also will focus on increasing the supply of accessible units for persons with disabilities. To address special housing and supportive needs, Collier County has identified the following one- year goals and plans to fund Tenant-Based Rental Assistance, supporting new construction of rental and homeowner housing, and providing assistance to homebuyers. HOME funds will be directed to projects that address the needs of persons who have an identified special need. HOME and CDBG funds have been utilized to support a range of developments to support special needs populations. For entitlement/consortia grantees: Specify the activities that the jurisdiction plans to undertake during the next year to address the housing and supportive services needs identified in accordance with 91.215(e) with respect to persons who are not homeless but have other special needs. Link to one-year goals. (91.220(2)) Collier County will prioritize increasing the supply of affordable housing that includes supportive services for special needs subpopulations. The county will give preference to projects that are rich in amenities and opportunity to include proximity to grocery stores, public transportation, 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 325 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 100 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) and job centers. Since many services available to special needs populations are offered through nonprofit agencies within the community, there is a need for these agencies to strengthen collaboration among service providers across the region to ensure appropriate delivery of services. To address special housing and supportive needs, Collier County has identified the following one-year goals and plans to fund Tenant-Based Rental Assistance, supporting new construction of rental and homeowner housing, and providing assistance to homebuyers. As it relates to housing, Collier County has allocated HOME funds for future development of affordable housing. Projects will be solicited through an application process and are strongly encouraged to include a set-aside for special needs populations. Collier County will continue our SHIP home repair programs that are frequently used by elderly persons, persons with disabilities, veterans, and families with children. As it relates to supportive services, the County will continue to provide CDBG funds for human services related to food assistance, social services, and assistance for victims of domestic violence and children at risk of child abuse. MA-40 Barriers to Affordable Housing – 91.210(e) Negative Effects of Public Policies on Affordable Housing and Residential Investment The Collier County Land Development Code, as amended through November 20, 2020, and the Naples Land Development Code, as amended through December 16, 2020, were each reviewed and evaluated against a list of common fair housing issues. The zoning regulations are permissive and allow for flexibility as to the most common fair housing issues. Neither jurisdiction received a high-risk score on any of the fair housing issues evaluated. However, the County and Naples received medium risk scores on certain issues where the zoning regulations still have the potential to negatively impact fair and affordable housing, and where improvements to the rules and policies could be made to protect the fair housing rights of the County’s residents more fully. On paper, the residential zoning criteria for the jurisdictions surveyed are not inherently prohibitive, and yet there is general consensus among residents, planning officials, housing advocates, and other stakeholders that Collier County and Naples suffer from an affordability gap for both affordable and workforce housing. This problem will only grow as rent and home prices are expected to continue to trend upward. Based on 2015 projections provided by the University of Florida’s Shimberg Center for Housing Studies, the County’s Affordable Housing Advisory Committee estimates that 43% of Collier households pay more than 30% of their income (the limit considered financially healthy) on housing related expenses, and 22% of households spend more than half of their income on housing. There are some development costs that local governments simply cannot control, such as materials and labor costs. However, there are other costs which government regulations directly impact: for example, raw land costs (via minimum lot size requirements), permitting costs, and impact fees. By reducing these costs, the hope is that there would be a trickle-down effect which would in turn make development of affordable housing more feasible. In the context of the area’s already costly rental and housing market, development standards may be a barrier to obtaining workforce and affordable housing for low to moderate income families and should be evaluated and tailored to the area’s estimation of affordability, that is the extent to which enough housing 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 326 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 101 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) units of different costs can be developed to provide each household with a unit it can afford (based on HUD’s 30%-of-income standard). 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 327 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 102 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) MA-45 Non-Housing Community Development Assets – 91.215 (f) Introduction In determining priorities for the allocation of federal funds, the Collier County has recognized the need to foster a competitive local economy that expands economic opportunities for present and future residents. A unique economic development trend in Collier County is the high number of seasonal residents who own property in the area. This phenomenon can cause data to trend in ways that do not truly reflect the economy year-round. This section describes the local workforce, the nature of current employment, and activities that coordinate economic development activities across local and regional agencies. Economic Development Market Analysis Business Activity Business by Sector Number of Workers Number of Jobs Share of Workers % Share of Jobs % Jobs less workers % Agriculture, Mining, Oil & Gas Extraction 3,969 4,573 3 4 1 Arts, Entertainment, Accommodations 24,234 24,862 21 22 1 Construction 10,554 11,915 9 10 1 Education and Health Care Services 17,850 19,482 16 17 1 Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate 6,972 6,368 6 6 -1 Information 1,522 1,382 1 1 0 Manufacturing 3,326 3,164 3 3 0 Other Services 5,299 5,613 5 5 0 Professional, Scientific, Management Services 7,525 6,333 7 6 -1 Public Administration 0 0 0 0 0 Retail Trade 17,653 16,551 16 15 -1 Transportation and Warehousing 1,866 1,284 2 1 -1 Wholesale Trade 3,817 3,696 3 3 0 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 328 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 103 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Business by Sector Number of Workers Number of Jobs Share of Workers % Share of Jobs % Jobs less workers % Total 104,587 105,223 -- -- -- Table 38 - Business Activity Data Source: 2011-2015 ACS (Workers), 2015 Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (Jobs) Labor Force Total Population in the Civilian Labor Force 146,855 Civilian Employed Population 16 years and over 135,345 Unemployment Rate 7.85 Unemployment Rate for Ages 16-24 20.22 Unemployment Rate for Ages 25-65 5.21 Table 39 - Labor Force Data Source: 2011-2015 ACS Occupations by Sector Number of People Management, business and financial 27,350 Farming, fisheries, and forestry occupations 6,120 Service 18,358 Sales and office 34,130 Construction, extraction, maintenance, and repair 16,960 Production, transportation, and material moving 5,985 Table 40 – Occupations by Sector Data Source: 2011-2015 ACS 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 329 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 104 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Travel Time Travel Time Number Percentage < 30 Minutes 82,289 67% 30-59 Minutes 34,824 28% 60 or More Minutes 6,520 5% Total 123,633 100% Table 41 - Travel Time Data Source: 2011-2015 ACS Education: Educational Attainment by Employment Status (Population 16 and Older) Educational Attainment In Labor Force Civilian Employed Unemployed Not in Labor Force Less than high school graduate 16,669 2,084 6,458 High school graduate (includes equivalency) 30,610 2,064 10,135 Some college or Associate's degree 28,220 2,264 8,455 Bachelor's degree or higher 31,780 1,404 9,355 Table 42 - Educational Attainment by Employment Status Data Source: 2011-2015 ACS 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 330 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 105 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Educational Attainment by Age Age 18–24 yrs 25–34 yrs 35–44 yrs 45–65 yrs 65+ yrs Less than 9th grade 678 3,615 3,605 6,625 5,299 9th to 12th grade, no diploma 3,765 3,503 3,552 4,269 4,114 High school graduate, GED, or alternative 8,899 9,663 9,969 23,170 22,075 Some college, no degree 6,984 5,179 4,975 15,770 17,695 Associate's degree 1,268 3,017 3,087 6,923 5,385 Bachelor's degree 1,331 6,110 5,975 15,235 18,920 Graduate or professional degree 14 1,874 3,135 10,195 16,160 Table 43 - Educational Attainment by Age Data Source: 2011-2015 ACS Educational Attainment – Median Earnings in the Past 12 Months Educational Attainment Median Earnings in the Past 12 Months Less than high school graduate $22,483 High school graduate (includes equivalency) $31,255 Some college or Associate's degree $37,184 Bachelor's degree $51,407 Graduate or professional degree $64,551 Table 44 – Median Earnings in the Past 12 Months Data Source: 2011-2015 ACS 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 331 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 106 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Based on the Business Activity table above, what are the major employment sectors within your jurisdiction? Collier County’s largest employment sectors are: • Sales and Office (34,130) • Management, Business, and Finance (27,350) • Service (18,358) Describe the workforce and infrastructure needs of the business community: Collier County’s workforce needs is heavily dependent on the hospitality industry with more than 20% of the County’s workforce employed in that industry. Education and healthcare represent the second largest sector of jobs in Collier County. The local economy will depend on a strong labor pool skilled in these industries. The County should continue job training and employment services and seek to increase community college attendance among residents in poorer areas including Immokalee, Bayshore residents, and residents residing in the RCAP/ECAP region. Describe any major changes that may have an economic impact, such as planned local or regional public or private sector investments or initiatives that have affected or may affect job and business growth opportunities during the planning period. Describe any needs for workforce development, business support or infrastructure these changes may create. The County’s travel and tourism industry was hard hit with the effects of the Coronavirus Pandemic. Prior to the pandemic the County had a strong business climate with many successful CEOs, low property tax rates, wealthier citizens with high median incomes, and the state of Florida has high ranking for a strong business environment. Residents will need skills in business development and management and job training and skills in various service industries including health care, education. While the arts, entertainment, tourism, and food services industries were the hardest hit during the pandemic, additional job training in new fields will become apparent as the County continues to recover from mandatory closures. How do the skills and education of the current workforce correspond to employment opportunities in the jurisdiction? A skillful and well-educated workforce is essential to attracting and retaining employers and growing the County’s economy. Residents with a bachelor’s degree or higher were less likely to be unemployed or not in the labor force than residents with less educational attainment. It is also important to note that while educational attainment shows that most county residents have educational attainment above a high school diploma, but most jobs are in sectors that do not require degrees. It will be important for the county to strengthen its ability to attract companies to open, relocate, or expand in Collier County. Describe any current workforce training initiatives, including those supported by Workforce Investment Boards, community colleges and other organizations. Describe how these efforts will support the jurisdiction's Consolidated Plan. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 332 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 107 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Career Source Southwest Florida provides individuals with career development resources in an effort to provide skilled workforce for businesses. The organization offers various assessments, workshops, and services to equip job seekers with the necessary skills to achieve self-sufficient employment. The work of Career Source Southwest Florida supports the Consolidated Plan by increasing job readiness and job opportunities in priority neighborhoods, encouraging microenterprise, and offering job skills and work programs to youth. Does your jurisdiction participate in a Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS)? The Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council prepares a CEDS (the current CEDS is 2018- 2022) to document economic development goals and priorities of the Southwest Florida region. If so, what economic development initiatives are you undertaking that may be coordinated with the Consolidated Plan? If not, describe other local/regional plans or initiatives that impact economic growth. Major program goals for the 2017-2022 goals are divided into six key areas: talent supply and education, quality of life & quality places, infrastructure and growth leadership, civic and governing systems, business climate & competitiveness, and innovation & economic development. CEDS goals include, but are not limited to: • Collier County has instituted a one cent sales tax to construct a high-tech center. • Provide sufficient funding and encourage flexibility to allow regional stakeholders to address local needs in education, training, and workforce development. • Ensure educational systems and workforce training that support innovation and creativity. • Protect natural resources to support quality environment and eco-tourism. • Develop projects that improve the region’s quality of life. • Increase the supply of workforce housing in the region. • Expand arts and cultural identity. • Develop transportation systems to support a prosperous, globally competitive economy while minimizing impacts to the natural environment. • Promote available ready-sites and buildings. • Improve public/private/civic cooperation, collaboration, and communication of the Region’s economic strategies. • Improve regional coordination of economic development, land use, infrastructure, water, and natural resource decision making. • Support the region’s growing elderly population. • Develop projects and programs that support existing and new business. • Increase investment in business development and placement in the Region. • Monitor CEDS Performance Measures. • Provide funding for ongoing economic development activities. • Provide technical assistance and use new technology to promote job growth. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 333 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 108 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) • Build seamless information technology infrastructure. • Encourage alternative energy production and green product industries. • Brand the region as a hub to attract and retain entrepreneurs. MA-50 Needs and Market Analysis Discussion Are there areas where households with multiple housing problems are concentrated? (include a definition of "concentration") As show in the map, the highest concentrations of low-income households (greater than 80%) with severe problems are Immokalee, and there are two targeted CRAs in the Bayshore-Gateway Triangle Area and Immokalee. There are significantly higher percentages of low-income households located in census tracts 0104.05, 0104.18, and 0104.20 within Collier County. Collier County -% of LI Households with Any of 4 Severe Housing Problems Source: HUD CPD Maps, https://egis.hud.gov/cpdmaps/ 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 334 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 109 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Collier County Census Tracts Source : www.geomap.ffiec.gov 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 335 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 110 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Are there any areas in the jurisdiction where racial or ethnic minorities or low-income families are concentrated? (include a definition of "concentration") An area of racial or ethnic concentration is defined as one in which the minority population share is 20% higher than the group’s Countywide average. There are a significant higher percentage of White residents throughout the County. White Population Concentration Source: HUD CPD Maps, https://egis.hud.gov/cpdmaps/ 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 336 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 111 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) What are the characteristics of the market in these areas/neighborhoods? Collier County targets resources in low-moderate income census block groups to meet regulatory requirements for CDBG grant funds and to target areas with the highest level of needs. These areas are considered “target areas” for use of HUD grant funds for area improvements, such as public infrastructure or facility improvements. HUD funds may also be spent outside of these targeted areas, as long as they provide services, improvements, affordable housing, or other benefits for low- and moderate-income households or special needs populations. Collier County - Median Home Value Source: HUD CPD Maps, https://egis.hud.gov/cpdmaps/ Are there any community assets in these areas/neighborhoods? The Collier Resource Center exists solely to help families and adults obtain assistance to navigate the maze of health and human service organizations. They provide information and referrals in many areas and make every effort to match residents with the most appropriate and adequate resources by providing personalized case management. There are resources for fundamental 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 337 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 112 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) necessities, medical and mental health services, services for people with disabilities, elderly and assistance for children, youth, and families. Are there other strategic opportunities in any of these areas? The Strategic Plan provided below identifies priority needs and geographic focus areas for community development and housing efforts in Collier County over the next five years. These priorities are based on findings from the need’s assessment and market analysis, along with public input received through a variety of engagement methods. The County will continue to concentrate CDBG, ESG, and HOME spending on public safety activities, housing initiatives, and public service activities. Projects and programs funded using CDBG, ESG, and HOME funds will meet program eligibility requirements, generate long term improvements for low- and moderate-income residents and communities, and help address federal, state, and local priorities, such as expanding fair housing choice and sustainability. This Strategic Plan also identifies market conditions which may influence the use of HUD grant funds, the resources expected to be available to meet community needs, and the structure in place for delivering services. Strategies for addressing public housing, homelessness, lead-based paint hazards, and poverty are summarized. Finally, the Plan outlines barriers to housing affordability in Collier County and will provide a plan to monitor performance and compliance for the CDBG, ESG, and HOME programs. The Strategic Plan will guide the use of CDBG and HOME in Collier County over the next five years and is guided by HUD’s three overarching goals that are applied according to the County’s needs. These goals are: • To provide decent housing by preserving the affordable housing stock, increasing the availability of affordable housing, reducing discriminatory barriers, increasing the supply of supportive housing for those with special needs, and transitioning homeless persons and families into housing. • To provide a suitable living environment through safer, more livable neighborhoods, greater integration of low- and moderate-income residents throughout the County, increased housing opportunities, and reinvestment in deteriorating neighborhoods. • To expand economic opportunities through more jobs paying self-sufficient wages, homeownership opportunities, development activities that promote long-term community viability, and the empowerment of low- and moderate-income persons to achieve self- sufficiency. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 338 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 113 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) MA-60 Broadband Needs of Housing occupied by Low- and Moderate-Income Households - 91.210(a)(4), 91.310(a)(2) Describe the need for broadband wiring and connections for households, including low- and moderate-income households and neighborhoods. For many Americans, access to computers and high-speed Internet connections in an integral part of their everyday lives. As most of information, services, and resources have transitioned to online access, digital inequality has a direct impact on low-income household’s social inequality. According to HUD’s Office of Policy Development, in the Digital Inequality and Low-Income Households Report, the disparate access to broadband can correlate with the inequality of income, education, race, and ethnicity. As part of the 2008 Broadband Data Improvement Act, the U.S. Census Bureau began asking about computer and Internet use in the 2018 American Community Survey (ACS). Federal agencies use these statistics to measure and monitor the nationwide development of broadband networks and to allocate resources intended to increase access to broadband technologies, particularly among groups with traditionally low levels of access. No longer a luxury, high speed internet access is relied upon for residents to fully engage in an expanding array of employment, education, training, financial and healthcare services. Internet access is relatively high but not universal for all households in Immokalee. Computer and Internet Use in the Collier County 2017 2018 2019 Estimate % Estimate % Estimate % Total: 144,354 (x) 144,172 (x) 140,578 (x) Has a computer: 133,979 92.8% 134,294 93.1% 134,309 95.5% With dial-up Internet subscription alone 124,560 86.3% 125,339 86.9% 125,181 89% With a broadband Internet subscription 123,909 85.8% 125,151 86.8% 124,786 88.8% Without an Internet subscription 19,794 13.7% 18,833 13.1% 15,397 11% No computer 10,375 7.2% 9,878 6.9% 3,269 4.5% Source: American Community Survey Reports, U.S. Census Bureau, www.data.census.gov 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 339 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 114 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Describe the need for increased competition by having more than one broadband Internet service provider serve the jurisdiction. Throughout the United States, there is a significant digital divide; a gap between those who have ready access to the internet and computers and those who do not. The divide is perpetuated by limitations that are geographical as well as financial, where persons cannot afford to pay a monthly service fee for Broadband service (an internet connection fast enough to stream a video). Nationwide, less than half of households living on or under $20,000 are connected. This lack of internet access in communities supports a deficit in opportunity, education, and other prospects.1 The figure below shows the number of fixed broadband providers. While the figure shows the number of providers available, it does not reflect the household level usage of broadband. From a fair housing perspective, ensuring that residential broadband is available to housing projects both within and in the outskirts of the county will support community viability and improve the quality of life for residents. 1 Vick, Karl. March 2017. The Digital Divide: A Quarter of the Nation is Without Broadband. Time. Available at: https://time.com/4718032/the-digital-divide/ 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 340 Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 115 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Fixed Broadband Deployment, 2021, https://broadbandmap.fcc.gov/ There are multiple broadband providers in Collier, including Orlando Telephone Company, Comcast, Century Link, Inc, Viasat, and Hughes Network. MA-65 Hazard Mitigation - 91.210(a)(5), 91.310(a)(3) Describe the jurisdiction’s increased natural hazard risks associated with climate change. According to the County’s 2020 Multi-Jurisdictional Local Mitigation Strategy, Collier County is threatened by several different types of natural, technological, and manmade hazards. These hazards endanger the health and safety of the people of the county, jeopardize its economic vitality, and imperil the quality of the natural environment. All lands bordering the Gulf Coast are susceptible to tidal effects and flooding. Due to the relative flatness of Collier County’s topography, historical water flow has always been shallow overland sheet flow during the wet season. Hurricanes and tropical storms can occur anywhere within the Collier County planning area. While coastal areas are most vulnerable to hurricanes, their wind and rain impacts can be felt hundreds of miles inland. All of Collier County is vulnerable to hurricane and tropical storm surge, but to varying degrees, with areas closer to the coast and water bodies that drain into the coast facing greater risk. Describe the vulnerability to these risks of housing occupied by low- and moderate-income households based on an analysis of data, findings, and methods. Over 95% of Collier County falls within the Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA). By definition of the 100-year flood event, SFHAs are defined as those areas that will be inundated by the flood event having a 1-percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year. Low-income properties located in these areas have a 26% chance of flooding over the life of a 30-year mortgage. According to NCEI, 35 recorded flood events affected the Collier County area from 2000 to 2019 causing an estimated $6,534,500 in property damage, with no fatalities, injuries, or crop damage. Debris also poses a risk both during and after a flood to all residents including low-income households. During a flood, debris carried by floodwaters can cause physical injury from impact. The second type of health problem arises after most of the water has gone. Stagnant pools can become breeding grounds for mosquitoes, and wet areas of a building that have not been properly cleaned breed 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 341 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 116 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) mold and mildew. A building that is not thoroughly cleaned becomes a health hazard, especially for small children and the elderly. Much of the housing that is affordable to lower income households is naturally occurring – meaning older and less desirable housing. Many of these older units, built to less stringent standards, may be at increased risk to natural hazards. The County has identified housing-related vulnerabilities of low- and moderate-income residents: • Most residents lack the savings and/or insurance required to weather significant economic challenges. • Economic shocks due to natural hazards, unexpected health expenses, or national economic conditions can very quickly translate into housing instability and foreclosure. • There is currently very little, if any, excess housing stock in the Collier County area. Lower income households are also more likely to lack rental insurance to recover from a disaster and will have greater difficulty affording the cost of installing and operating cooling systems if temperatures continue to rise. Strategic Plan SP-05 Overview Strategic Plan Overview The Strategic Plan provided below identifies priority needs and geographic focus areas for community development and housing efforts in the Collier County for the next five years. This Plan will identify the County’s anti-poverty initiatives, market conditions, available resources, and the plan to monitor performance and compliance for each HUD program for which it receives funds. The priorities identified are based on the information received from needs assessment surveys, market analysis, stakeholder meetings, and public comments. Collier County is anticipating over $18 million in federal funds over this 5-year Consolidated Plan period. Collier County Community & Human Service Division will administer these grant funds. The Community and Human Services Division will partner with county departments, nonprofit partners, developers, community housing development organizations, and the local housing authority to expend these funds on eligible activities that address the strategic priorities listed in this Plan. CDBG, HOME, and ESG allocations will be leveraged to generate long term improvements for low and moderate-income residents and communities while helping to address various federal, state, and local priorities, such as affordable housing, fair housing choice, economic development, homelessness, and lead-based paint hazards. The county will concentrate CDBG, HOME, and ESG spending on community facilities, infrastructure projects, and public service activities. HOME funds will be utilized on the development or rehabilitation of single and multi-family housing units, tenant-based rental assistance activities, and homebuyer activities. Additionally, the County will focus on rapid re- 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 342 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 117 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) housing, homelessness prevention, emergency shelter, and essential services for the homeless with the ESG grant. The County currently has 97 Census Block groups that are classified as low/moderate income. These tracts were defined by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) as low/moderate-income and are shown on the map below and table below. FY 2020 ACS 5-Year 2011-2015 Low- and Moderate-Income Summary Data Tract Blckgrp Low Lowmod Lmmi Lowmoduniv Lowmod_pct 010510 2 385 480 645 940 51.06% 010412 3 100 1065 1470 2065 51.57% 010506 1 555 670 955 1290 51.94% 010105 1 85 550 815 1045 52.63% 010505 2 635 1445 1905 2730 52.93% 010601 1 445 500 580 940 53.19% 010108 2 145 415 505 775 53.55% 010300 2 180 615 865 1135 54.19% 010701 4 295 510 880 925 55.14% 010419 2 675 985 1395 1730 56.94% 010411 3 1185 1770 2240 3030 58.42% 010605 1 160 555 810 950 58.42% 010506 3 1540 1690 2150 2880 58.68% 010507 1 1650 2055 2655 3475 59.14% 011301 3 505 870 1100 1455 59.79% 010110 4 360 860 975 1435 59.93% 010411 1 1425 2150 2720 3535 60.82% 010803 1 480 1055 1300 1730 60.98% 011102 3 510 640 785 1045 61.24% 010701 2 350 500 670 815 61.35% 010701 1 545 980 1380 1585 61.83% 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 343 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 118 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) 011400 1 780 1070 1440 1730 61.85% 010417 3 155 630 715 1015 62.07% 010509 2 350 690 900 1105 62.44% 010211 1 230 535 700 840 63.69% 011105 2 630 735 800 1130 65.04% 011302 3 1475 2045 2915 3115 65.65% 011400 3 1090 1115 1460 1675 66.57% 010803 3 530 965 1175 1430 67.48% 010110 3 370 865 940 1260 68.65% 010419 1 875 1520 1820 2205 68.93% 010702 1 780 1120 1385 1620 69.14% 010420 2 1255 2270 2695 3260 69.63% 011301 2 2045 2990 3665 4180 71.53% 010508 1 1125 2415 2760 3375 71.56% 010701 3 175 330 370 450 73.33% 011204 1 575 855 1150 1150 74.35% 010410 2 815 1390 1775 1835 75.75% 011102 2 835 860 940 1135 75.77% 010604 3 290 975 1205 1260 77.38% 010605 3 570 960 1035 1240 77.42% 010601 2 935 1140 1370 1470 77.55% 010410 1 1995 3195 3805 4075 78.40% 000700 1 865 1125 1280 1425 78.95% 010420 3 755 1270 1310 1600 79.38% 011103 2 880 1135 1325 1395 81.36% 011205 1 715 965 1080 1165 82.83% 010410 3 2135 3550 3860 4180 84.93% 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 344 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 119 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) 010420 1 1050 1725 1900 2015 85.61% 011302 1 890 1690 1830 1955 86.45% 010802 4 870 1075 1225 1225 87.76% 010802 3 1170 1940 2120 2145 90.44% 011400 2 580 1085 1140 1195 90.79% 011204 2 1795 1900 2045 2045 92.91% 011302 2 1275 1650 1765 1765 93.48% 011205 2 1185 1275 1290 1340 95.15% 011204 3 715 775 775 810 95.68% 011301 1 590 850 850 880 96.59% SP-10 Geographic Priorities – 91.215 (a)(1) Geographic Area Collier County is an urban area that relies on widely accepted data such as American Community Survey (ACS), HUD low and moderate-income summary data, and Federal Financial Institutions Examinations Council (FFIEC) data to determine areas throughout the community with concentrations of low and moderate-income communities. Program resources are allocated county-wide based on low-mod areas, which often coincide with areas of minority concentration. Over the next five years, the County intends to utilize CDBG, HOME, and ESG funds in areas where 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 345 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 120 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) 51% or more of residents have low or moderate household incomes) are shown in the map below: Collier County and the City of Naples participate together in the Urban County CDBG Program. Marco Island, an incorporated city within the County, opted out of participation in 2012. Table 45 - Geographic Priority Areas General Allocation Priorities Describe the basis for allocating investments geographically within the jurisdiction (or within the EMSA for HOPWA) Collier County receives a direct entitlement of CDBG, HOME, and ESG funds from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development to address the needs in the community. The needs identified during the Needs Assessment process were not exclusive to any specific geographic area within the County. Collier County has opted to undertake projects that will benefit income-eligible households throughout the County rather than identifying a target area. Program Target Area Description Target Area Name: Countywide Target Area Type: Countywide 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 346 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 121 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) resources are allocated countywide based on low-mod areas, which often coincide with areas of minority concentration. The following map depict the low- and moderate-income block groups within Collier County. The low-income block groups identified in the map below will generally be prioritized for allocation of Consolidated Plan resources, however, individual low- and moderate-income persons residing anywhere in Collier County may be eligible beneficiaries of CDBG funds. Source: HUD CPD Mapping Tool, https://egis.hud.gov/cpdmaps/ 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 347 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 122 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) SP-25 Priority Needs - 91.215(a)(2) Priority Needs Through the Consolidated Planning process, the County has evaluated needs and assessed the market to determine gaps in services and needs in the community. Through the evaluation and findings of other studies focused on community development along with the needs and concerns established throughout the public participation process, a set of seven (7) priority needs have been identified to guide the use of community development funds throughout the next five years. 1 Priority Need Name Housing Affordability Priority Level High Population Extremely Low Income Low-Income Moderate Income Geographic Areas Affected Countywide – Collier County, FL Associated Goals - New Construction, Rehabilitation, or Acquisition of Housing for Homeownership - New Construction, Rehabilitation, or Acquisition of Housing for Homeownership Rental Housing - Homebuyer Assistance - CHDO Set-Aside - Tenant Based Rental Assistance 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 348 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 123 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Description - Provide down-payment assistance (principal reduction and closing cost reduction) to eligible low- and moderate-income homebuyers. - Provide rental subsidies (TBRA) to low-income households to make existing units affordable for elderly, frail elderly, disabled persons, and veterans. - Support the development of affordable rental and owned housing, including projects located near job centers that will be affordable to service employees and other low-wage members of the workforce. - Support homeownership opportunities for households through down payment or closing cost assistance. Basis for Relative Priority The need for affordable housing for target populations was shown to be in great need in the Housing Market Analysis, and Community Needs Survey. As demonstrated in the Housing Needs Assessment many families suffer from substandard conditions, overcrowding, and have a severe housing cost burden. 2 Priority Need Name Homelessness & Homelessness Prevention Priority Level High Population Extremely Low-Income Low-Income Moderate-Income Disabled (Physical, Mental, Behavioral Health) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 349 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 124 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Elderly and Frail Elderly Children and Youth Homeless and At-Risk Populations Geographic Areas Affected Countywide – Collier County, FL Associated Goals - Support Emergency Housing and Services for the Homeless - HMIS Support - Provide Rapid Re-Housing and Homelessness Prevention Description - Assist persons who are homeless through emergency, transitional, and permanent housing, and supportive services. - Assist households at risk of homelessness with short-term rental payment and other assistance. - Assist agencies in tracking homelessness services through a homeless management information system. Basis for Relative Priority As demonstrated in the Homeless Needs Assessment section of this plan and the Community Needs Survey, the homeless population in the Collier County continues to grow without the increase of services to meet their needs. Interviews with community stakeholders, public meeting comments, and survey data reveled through our strategic planning process that this is a high priority, 3 Priority Need Name Public Facilities Priority Level High Population Extremely Low-Income 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 350 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 125 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Low-Income Moderate-Income Disabled (Physical, Mental, Behavioral Health) Elderly and Frail Elderly Children and Youth Homeless and At-Risk Populations Geographic Areas Affected Countywide – Collier County, FL Associated Goals - Improve Public Facilities - Improve Other Facilities Description - Support public facility improvements that benefit low/moderate income households and persons, and persons with special needs to include community centers, health care facilities, parks, and public safety stations/offices, as well as other allowable public facility projects. - Improve existing deteriorated public facilities and infrastructure in low- and moderate- income areas. Basis for Relative Priority The need for facilities is shown through the continued expressed need from the Community Needs Survey. 4 Priority Need Name Public Infrastructure Improvements Priority Level High 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 351 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 126 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Population Extremely Low-Income Low-Income Moderate-Income Disabled (Physical, Mental, Behavioral Health) Elderly and Frail Elderly Children and Youth Homeless and At-Risk Populations Geographic Areas Affected Countywide – Collier County, FL Associated Goals - Public Infrastructure Improvements Description - Support public infrastructure improvements that benefit low/moderate income households that eliminate blight, improve safety, and provide new affordable housing to include demolition and redevelopment, sidewalk construction and repair, street improvements, streetscaping, street lighting, crosswalks and pedestrian signaling systems, stormwater improvements, and other allowable infrastructure improvements not listed here. - Improve existing deteriorated infrastructure in low- and moderate-income areas. Basis for Relative Priority The need for infrastructure is shown through the continued demand for assistance from the various programs and the expressed need from the Community Need Survey, interviews with key community stakeholders, consultation with County staff, survey data, prior studies conducted by the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 352 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 127 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) 5 Priority Need Name Public Services Priority Level High Population Extremely Low-Income Low-Income Moderate-Income Disabled (Physical, Mental, Behavioral Health) Elderly and Frail Elderly Children and Youth Homeless and At-Risk Populations Geographic Areas Affected Countywide – Collier County, FL Associated Goals - Provide Public Service Description Fund projects that provide supportive services to low- and moderate-income households as well as persons with special needs, specifically including but not limited to medical and dental services, mental health and substance abuse services, services to persons with disabilities, senior services, youth services, housing counseling, legal services, services for victims of domestic violence, employment training, and other allowable public services not listed here. Basis for Relative Priority Through the Community Needs Survey and interviews with key community stakeholders, public meeting input, survey data. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 353 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 128 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) 6 Priority Need Name Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Choice Priority Level High Population All Geographic Areas Affected Countywide – Collier County, FL Associated Goals Provide public services Provide assistance and education to homebuyers Description Support targeted fair housing activities such as fair housing education, complaint handling services, and enforcement. Basis for Relative Priority Impediment identified in AI 7 Priority Need Name Program Administration and Planning Priority Level High Population All Geographic Areas Affected Countywide – Collier County, FL Associated Goals - Program Administration 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 354 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 129 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Description Performance of administrative and planning requirements of CDBG, HOME, and ESG programs. Basis for Relative Priority Consultation with County staff Table 46 – Priority Needs Summary 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 355 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 130 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) SP-30 Influence of Market Conditions – 91.215 (b) Influence of Market Conditions Table 47 – Influence of Market Conditions Affordable Housing Type Market Characteristics that will influence the use of funds available for housing type Tenant Based Rental Assistance (TBRA) TBRA is an important tool for families to maintain affordable housing. Severe cost burden is the greatest predictor of homelessness risk, with populations paying more than 50% of their income towards housing costs or having incomes at or below 50% AMI at greatest risk of becoming homeless TBRA for Non- Homeless Special Needs Lack of units with supportive services influences this program. Based upon consultations with homeless housing and social service agencies, a need for supportive housing has been identified as a priority. The special needs households include those with disabilities, persons with mental illness, elderly, frail elderly, veterans, as well as dysfunctional households facing a variety of issues. Market characteristics impacting this priority relate to the shortage of privately-owned housing units which are available to provide supportive housing programs. This problem is intensified by the lack of public funds. New Unit Production Rents will not financially support the cost of new unit production. A shortage of affordable, decent housing units is an identified need. The market characteristics influencing this priority include the age and condition of the existing housing stock without the rent levels to support rehabilitation. New construction faces the same market conditions. The HOME program can provide some resources to address this issue. Rehabilitation Rents will not financially support the cost of major rehabilitation projects similar to the new unit production priority discussed above, the achievable rents and income levels in the County often result in rehabilitation in the private marketplace to be financially infeasible. This issue is intensified by the age and condition of the housing stock. Acquisition, including preservation Lack of funding available to finance projects. There are opportunities to improve the conditions and affordability of housing by the acquisition of vacant, deteriorating structures. These structures are for the most part multi-unit in nature or previously nonresidential buildings appropriate for conversion. The cost and complexity of acquisition and rehabilitation of these structures usually requires implementations by an experienced housing development entity and financial assistance. When structures are of historic or architectural value, the cost can be increased. Similar to the new unit production, the HOME program can provide the resources for this type of development. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 356 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 131 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) SP-35 Anticipated Resources - 91.215(a)(4), 91.220(c)(1,2) Introduction Collier County Entitlement grant resources totaling $4,567,555.47 are anticipated for the 2021 program year to meet underserved needs, foster decent affordable housing, develop institutional structure, and enhance coordination between public and private housing and social service agencies. Along with the County’s 2021 annual CDBG, HOME, and ESG allocations, this figure includes $134,787.17 in prior year CDBG funds and $666,127.30 in prior year HOME funds that will be reprogrammed for use this year. Additionally, this figure includes an estimated $20,000 in program income, which the County anticipates receiving from its CDBG program for use in 2021. Anticipated Resources • Bond Financing: For multi-family affordable housing and single-family projects. A portion of the bonds issued by a state, local government, or housing development agency may be considered as HOME match. • Collier County Housing Trust Fund: Administered by the County eligible activities include predevelopment, acquisition, construction, and rehabilitation costs associated with low- income housing development. The full amount of Collier Housing Trust Fund grants/loans invested into the project is eligible as HOME match. • Florida Affordable Housing Tax Credit Program: Administered by the State of Florida, this program provides below-market interest rates for low-income housing projects. The maximum interest rate reduction is approximately 4% below market, for a maximum term of 20 years. HOME match is calculated by applying the present discounted cash value to the total yield foregone by the lender. • Affordable Housing Surtax: Passed by the voters in 2018 Property Tax Exemptions: Not for profit developers may receive an exemption from property taxes have been awarded on a project-by-project basis to low-income housing developments. Generally based on the benefits provided to the community and the duration of the low-income housing commitment. • Volunteer Labor: Area non-profit housing developers have been successful in utilizing volunteer labor in their developments. Architects, attorneys, and other professionals have also contributed their services to non-profit housing developments in Collier. Volunteer labor is eligible as HOME match. • Private Contributions: Cash and materials have been contributed to the past by private businesses, lenders, corporations, and foundations to assist in the development of low- income housing in the County. It is expected that future contributions from private sources will continue to provide needed assistance. Private contributions are eligible as HOME match. • Other Federal Resources Used at the Local Level: Federal Low-income Housing Tax Credits are allocated by the State of Florida and are used to subsidize rental housing developments that are affordable to persons with incomes below 60% AMI. Area projects have typically applied for the 9% tax credits in order to serve a lower-income population. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 357 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 132 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) The 9% tax credits are more desirable but statewide demand greatly exceeds available funding. • Publicly owned land: The County has a history of utilizing public property for affordable housing. Currently one property is under development for low-income affordable housing in the County. The County does own land itself that could be put toward affordable housing, but is looking at what it has, as well as land owned by other public agencies, to determine whether certain properties are well suited for affordable housing. • State Housing Initiatives Partnership program (SHIP): Provides funds to local governments as an incentive to create partnerships that produce and preserve affordable homeownership and multifamily housing. The program was designed to serve very low, low- and moderate-income families. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 358 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 133 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Program Source of Funds Uses of Funds Expected Amount Available Year 1 Expected Amount Available Remainder of Con Plan $ Narrative Description Annual Allocation: $ Program Income: $ Prior Year Resources: $ Total: $ CDBG Public – Federal - Public services - Infrastructure and facility improvements - Housing - Economic Development - Administration - Fair Housing $2,774,274 $20,000 $134,787.17 $2,899,061.17 $11,596,244.68 Anticipated Year 1 funding will include entitlement grant funds, program income, and prior year unallocated funds HOME Public – Federal - Homebuyer assistance - Acquisition - Rental or homeowner rehab - Rental or homeownership new construction - Tenant-based rental assistance - Administration $753,000 $31,571 $666,127.30 $1,450,698.30 $5,802,793.20 Anticipated Year 1 funding will include entitlement grant funds, program income, and prior year unallocated funds ESG Public – Federal - Shelter Operations - Rapid Re-Housing - Homelessness Prevention - HMIS - Administration $217,796 $0 $0 $217,796 $871,184.00 Anticipated Year 1 funding will include entitlement grant funds Table 48 - Anticipated Resources 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 359 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 134 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Explain how federal funds will leverage those additional resources (private, state, and local funds), including a description of how matching requirements will be satisfied. Collier County leverages a combination of public and private funding to conduct activities identified in this plan. During this Consolidated Plan period, the County will research opportunities to apply for additional funding streams that are consistent with the goals of the Consolidated Plan. Infrastructure improvements projects capitalize on the ongoing revitalization efforts in the Bayshore Gateway Triangle and the Immokalee CRA. These areas were designated by the Collier County Board of Commissioners to boost the local economy and uplift surrounding communities. Additionally, the County works with several nonprofit organizations by granting funding for facility improvements and services. These grant funds are leveraged by private donations and other resources to provide services to clients or residents of Collier County. The HOME program requires a 25% match of the total amount of funds drawn down during the federal fiscal year. Collier County HOME subrecipients are required to submit a match log that identifies the sources of match funds for each fiscal year. Match funds can be derived from various sources to include: the value of sponsorships from local businesses; waived County fees; donated land or improvements; volunteer hours; donated materials; or by other eligible methods as provided in the HOME regulations. When necessary, the County also uses its SHIP funding to match HOME funds. Historically, match amounts for HOME subrecipients have far exceeded the 25% annual contribution requirements stipulated by HOME program regulations. The ESG program requires a 100% match for the total amount of funds drawn down during the federal fiscal year. Collier County requires all ESG subrecipients to provide a dollar-for-dollar match by calculating the value of volunteer hours, private donations, and salary not covered by ESG, other grant funding, in-kind donations, or by other eligible methods as provided in the ESG regulations. The County also provides match support for the ESG program from general funds. If appropriate, describe publicly owned land or property located within the jurisdiction that may be used to address the needs identified in the plan County owned land will be used in in the development of 82 housing units at the Bembridge property in partnership with McDowell Housing partners. There is no HUD funding in this development. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 360 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 135 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) SP-40 Institutional Delivery Structure – 91.215(k) Explain the institutional structure through which the jurisdiction will carry out its consolidated plan including private industry, nonprofit organizations, and public institutions. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 361 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 136 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Responsible Entity Responsible Entity Type Role Geographic Area Served Collier County Government CDBG, HOME, and ESG Program Administration Collier County Able Academy Nonprofit Organization Public Service Collier County Boys & Girls Club of Collier County Nonprofit Organization Public Service Collier County Children's Advocacy Center of Collier County Nonprofit Organization Public Service Collier County Collier County Housing Authority Housing Authority Homeownership/ Affordable Housing Collier County Collier County Hunger and Homeless Coalition Nonprofit Organization Homeownership/ Affordable Housing Collier County Collier Resource Center, Inc. Nonprofit Organization Public Service Collier County Collier Senior Resources Nonprofit Organization Public Service Collier County David Lawrence Centers for Behavioral Health Nonprofit Organization Public Service Collier County Drug Free Collier Nonprofit Organization Public Service Collier County Empty Bowls Naples, Inc Nonprofit Organization Public Service Collier County Grace Place for Children and Families Nonprofit Organization Public Service Collier County Habitat for Humanity of Collier County Nonprofit Organization Homeownership/ Affordable Housing Collier County Harry Chapin Food Bank Nonprofit Organization Public Service Collier County 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 362 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 137 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Hope for Families Ministry Nonprofit Organization Public Service Collier County Immokalee CRA Nonprofit Organization Public Service Collier County Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance Nonprofit Organization Homeownership/ Affordable Housing Collier County Legal Aid Service of Collier County Nonprofit Organization Public Service Collier County Lighthouse of Collier Nonprofit Organization Public Service Collier County Meals of Hope Nonprofit Organization Public Service Collier County NAMI Collier County Nonprofit Organization Public Service Collier County Naples Senior Center at JFCS Nonprofit Organization Public Service Collier County Our Daily Bread Food Pantry Incorporated Nonprofit Organization Public Service Collier County Residential Options of Florida (ROOF) Nonprofit Organization Public Service Collier County St. Matthews House Nonprofit Organization Public Service Collier County St. Vincent de Paul Society, Naples Nonprofit Organization Public Service Collier County STARability Foundation Nonprofit Organization Public Service Collier County The Immokalee Foundation Nonprofit Organization Public Service Collier County The Salvation Army Naples Nonprofit Organization Public Service Collier County The Shelter for Abused Women & Children Nonprofit Organization Public Service Collier County 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 363 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 138 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) United Way of Collier and the Keys Nonprofit Organization Public Service Collier County Wounded Warriors of Collier Nonprofit Organization Public Service Collier County Youth Haven, Inc. Nonprofit Organization Public Service Collier County Table 49 - Institutional Delivery Structure Assess of Strengths and Gaps in the Institutional Delivery System Collier County has a comprehensive network of service providers that is made up of nonprofits, private sector developers, community-based development organizations, local housing authorities, and coalitions. Additionally, Collier County has enough staff capacity to dedicate one staff member per grant program that is administers. This allows both the staff and the service providers to become subject matter experts in their grant programs. This expertise maximizes both the efficiency and effectiveness of the programs administration and minimizes mistakes. One of the greatest gaps in the Institutional Delivery System is the financial capacity of the nonprofit partners. The funding Collier County provides is intended to be supplemental to the operation of programs. For many of the nonprofits the County’s funding represents the majority of the money expended for a program and limits the reach of the program beyond the amount allocated by HUD. An additional gap has been identified since the release of the revised HOME Final Rule. The final rule eliminated the ability of local housing authorities to serve as Community Housing Development Organizations (CHDOs). While a new CHDO has been identified to take the place of this housing authority some local institutional knowledge has been lost in the transition. Availability of services targeted to homeless persons and persons with HIV and mainstream services. Homelessness Prevention Services Available in the Community Targeted to Homeless Targeted to People with HIV Homelessness Prevention Services Counseling/Advocacy X X X Legal Assistance X X X Mortgage Assistance X Rental Assistance X X Utilities Assistance X X 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 364 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 139 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Street Outreach Services Law Enforcement X Mobile Clinics Other Street Outreach Services X Supportive Services Alcohol & Drug Abuse X X X Child Care X X X Education X Employment and Employment Training X Healthcare X X X HIV/AIDS X X X Life Skills X X Mental Health Counseling X X X Transportation X Other Other Table 50 - Homeless Prevention Services Summary Describe how the service delivery system including, but not limited to, the services listed above meet the needs of homeless persons (particularly chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth) Collier County has a comprehensive network of service providers that is made up of nonprofits, private sector developers, community-based development organizations, local housing authorities, and coalitions. Additionally, Collier County has enough staff capacity to dedicate one staff member per grant program that is administers. This allows both the staff and the service providers to become subject matter experts in their grant programs. This expertise maximizes both the efficiency and effectiveness of the programs administration and minimizes mistakes. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 365 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 140 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) One of the greatest gaps in the Institutional Delivery System is the financial capacity of the nonprofit partners. The funding Collier County provides is intended to be supplemental to the operation of programs. For many of the nonprofits the County’s funding represents most of the money expended for a program and limits the reach of the program beyond the amount allocated by HUD. An additional gap has been identified since the release of the revised HOME Final Rule. The final rule eliminated the ability of local housing authorities to serve as Community Housing Development Organizations (CHDOs). While a new CHDO has been identified to take the place of this housing authority some local institutional knowledge has been lost in the transition. Describe the strengths and gaps of the service delivery system for special needs population and persons experiencing homelessness, including, but not limited to, the services listed above The County has been successful at partnering with several agencies serving persons with special needs via entitlement funding, and also has provided services and programs to persons with special needs via the SHIP program, which aids in the production and preservation of affordable homeownership and multifamily housing for very low, low, and moderate-income households. Although the County has been successful at working with many of the non-profit organizations in the community, gaps in service delivery include supportive services for homeless individuals, persons with special needs, and supportive housing and transitional housing for residents with substance and alcohol abuse issues. Provide a summary of the strategy for overcoming gaps in the institutional structure and service delivery system for carrying out a strategy to address priority needs. The most significant gap in the service delivery system is identifying sufficient funding to meet the needs identified. Collier County typically receives requests for four to five times the funding available on an annual basis. Consequently, funding is allocated to as many high priorities needs, and projects as is practicable. Given the limited HUD funding available to completely overcome the gaps in the institutional structure, the County collaborates with various partners to ensure that priority needs are addressed. For example, the County operates as the lead agency for the Area Agency on Aging, which provides case management and other services for seniors and oversees a daily nutritional program for seniors in the community. Also, the County seeks and has been successful in receiving many other awards to address priority needs. These grants include a SHIP award to assist with homeowner and rental opportunities and a state of Florida Criminal Justice, Mental Health and Substance Abuse grant through which the County partners with the Sheriff’s office and a local mental health facility to improve outcomes for persons in the criminal justice system who have mental health issues. The development of social service collaborations across the region to coordinate the work of social service organizations, disseminate news and information, and spearhead community-wide solutions to local needs is necessary to assist the community in overcoming gaps in services for the homeless and residents with substance abuse issues. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 366 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 141 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) SP-45 Goals Summary – 91.215(a)(4) Goal Descriptions • Provide Assistance and Education to Homebuyers - Funds will be used to assist low-income, first-time homebuyers with down-payment assistance to purchase a home. • Support New Construction, Rehabilitation, or Acquisition of Affordable Housing for Homeownership – Funds will be used to support new construction, rehabilitation, or acquisition of affordable housing for homeownership. • Support New Construction, Rehabilitation, or Acquisition of Affordable Rental Housing – Funds will be used to support new construction, rehabilitation, or acquisition of affordable housing for rental housing. • CHDO Set-Aside – Funds will be used to support new construction, rehabilitation, or acquisition of affordable housing for housing developed by a CHDO. • Tenant Based Rental Assistance – Funds will be used to provide rental subsidies to low-income persons, persons with mental illness, elderly, frail elderly, disabled, and veterans. • Support Emergency Shelter and Services for the Homeless – Funds will be used to provide emergency shelter services and permanent housing for homeless persons. • HMIS Support – Funds will be used to collect client-level data and data on the provision of housing and services to homeless individuals and families and persons at risk of homelessness. • Provide Homelessness Prevention - Funds will be used to provide permanent housing to prevent persons from becoming homeless. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 367 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 142 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Sort Order Goal Name Start Year End Year Category Geographic Area Priority Needs Addressed Funding Goal Outcome Indicator 1 Administration & Planning 2021 2025 Other Countywide Provide Administration & Planning CDBG: $2,773,270 ESG: $81,678.50 HOME: $392,123.70 Other: Planning & Administration: CDBG: 5; HOME: 5; ESG: 5 2 Support New Construction or Rehabilitation or Acquisition of Affordable Rental Housing 2021 2025 Affordable Housing Countywide Housing Affordability CDBG: $2,500,000 Rental Units Constructed: 400 2 Improve Public Infrastructure 2021 2025 Non-Housing Community Development Countywide Public Infrastructure Improvement CDBG: $918,380 Public facility or infrastructure activities other than low/moderate-income housing benefit: 5,625 3 Improve Public and Other Facilities 2021 2025 Non- Housing Community Development Countywide Public Facilities CDBG: $672,751.32 Public facility or infrastructure activities other than low/moderate-income housing benefit: 900 4 Support New Construction, Rehabilitation, or Acquisition of Affordable Rental Housing 2021 2025 Affordable Housing Countywide Housing Affordability CDBG: $5,395,000.00 HOME: $2,000,000.00 Rental Units Rehabilitated Assisted: 260 Rental Units Acquired: 5 5 Provide Public Services 2021 2025 -Community Development Countywide Public Services CDBG: $1,741,755.85 Number of persons assisted: 1100 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 368 Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 143 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) 6 Support New Construction, Rehabilitation, or Acquisition of Affordable Housing for Homeownership 2021 2025 Affordable Housing Countywide Housing Affordability HOME: $1,245,058.60 Other: Rental Units Acquired: 5 7 CHDO 2022 2025 Affordable Housing Countywide Housing Affordability CHDO Set-aside: $451,800 Rental Units Constructed: 20 8 Support Emergency Housing and Services for the Homeless 2021 2025 Homeless Countywide Homelessness & Homelessness Prevention ESG: $500,000.00 Homeless Person Overnight Shelter: 600 9 HMIS Support 2021 2025 Other Countywide Homelessness & Homelessness Prevention ESG: $200,000.00 Other: HMIS Support 10 Homeless Prevention & Rapid Rehousing 2021 2025 Homeless Countywide Homelessness & Homelessness Prevention ESG: $307,306.50 Homelessness Prevention: 25 persons 11 Tenant Based Rental Assistance 2021 2025 Homeless Countywide Homelessness & Homelessness Prevention HOME: $500,000 Tenant-based Rental Assistance/ Rapid Rehousing: 20 Table 51 – Goals Summary 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 369 Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 144 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Estimate the number of extremely low-income, low-income, and moderate-income families to whom the jurisdiction will provide affordable housing as defined by HOME 91.315(b)(2) Over the next five years, Collier County anticipates providing affordable housing for an estimated 25 extremely low-income, low- income, or moderate-income families through CHDO activities, and support for new construction, rehabilitation, or acquisition of affordable rental or for-sale housing using HOME funds. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 370 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 145 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) SP-50 Public Housing Accessibility and Involvement – 91.215(c) Need to Increase the Number of Accessible Units (if Required by a Section 504 Voluntary Compliance Agreement) The Collier County Housing Authority (CCHA) is an independent authority established under state law, is separate from the general control of the County, and operates no HUD-funded public housing units. The Collier County Housing Authority is not required by a Section 504 Voluntary Compliance Agreement to increase the number of accessible units. Activities to Increase Resident Involvements The Collier County Housing Authority undertakes a variety of initiatives to increase resident involvement which include established programs that represent all residents living in Housing Authority developments. The Collier County Housing Authority coordinates programs, activities, and services offered to residents, including: Family Self Sufficiency Program - designed to assist residents with achieving self- sufficiency. This effort is accomplished through goal setting, intervention, advocacy, and community collaboration. When entering the program, the residents meet with a Family Self Sufficiency (FSS) Program Coordinator to discuss their needs and to set goals. Residents can receive assistance with seeking employment, job training, and educational opportunities. Is the public housing agency designated as troubled under 24 CFR part 902? The Collier County Housing Authority is not designated as troubled and is considered a high performer. Plan to remove the ‘troubled’ designation Not applicable SP-55 Barriers to affordable housing – 91.215(h) Barriers to Affordable Housing The inventory of affordable housing in Collier County is not sufficient to meet the demand for affordable units. One of the primary challenges to creating and preserving affordable housing in Collier County is that household income is failing to keep up with rising housing costs. The local economy is focused on retail, hospitality, services, and agriculture; however, high housing costs have priced out much of the workforce needed for the county to function. Strategy to Remove or Ameliorate the Barriers to Affordable Housing 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 371 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 146 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Collier County faces a burgeoning issue in trying to identify, quantify and qualify new and existing affordable housing units. With a wider range of housing options, Collier County would be better equipped to tackle the affordable housing problem. The effort requires comprehensive strategies and a variety of tools that can be used alone or in combination to reduce costs and increase availability. During this consolidated plan period, Collier County will continue to Review and Revise the Land Development Code which, if done well will make it easier to implement necessary changes to encourage housing affordability. The current Land Development Code (LDC) does not consistently support and encourage growth in already existing urbanized areas of the county (those areas generally west of Collier Parkway). Many of the LDC’s ordinances are geared toward large-scale, planned-unit developments (PUDs) on greenfield sites. Conversely, smaller-scale redevelopment and infill sites in already developed areas of the county are challenging to consolidate, may need to address adjacent uses and neighborhood concerns, and often require additional density to make them financially feasible. Collier County can also consider reducing parking standards to achieve affordability, permitting guest houses as accessory dwelling rental unit, encouraging smart-site infrastructure, and identify strategic opportunity sites. SP-60 Homelessness Strategy – 91.215(d) Reaching out to homeless persons (especially unsheltered persons) and assessing their individual needs Collier County, through its nonprofit partners, provides services for the homeless by allocating ESG funding. The network of services providers refers clients to one another for assistance on an ad hoc basis. They work to build trusting relationships with homeless persons living on the streets and in shelters as well as at-risk populations to remain stably housed. The subrecipients perform assessments for homeless persons and those at risk of homelessness to link them to shelter and other supportive services that are appropriate to meet their needs. All subrecipients funded through the County’s ESG will participate in coordinated entry. Additionally, the County also continues to provide funding for salaries and operating costs to shelters in the community including the Shelter for Abused Women and Children. The County also supports facility improvements at local emergency shelter locations. Collier County also participates in the Point in Time Count to identify the number of homeless persons in the County and to appropriately allocate funding to address homelessness and human trafficking victims. Addressing the emergency and transitional housing needs of homeless persons Collier County currently awards its ESG entitlement funds to subrecipients for the operation of emergency shelters, provision of hotel/motel vouchers, financial assistance through rapid re- housing to become stably housed and homeless prevention programs to serve individuals and families. Some emergency shelters and homeless prevention programs are designed to focus their services to the needs of specific populations such as families, victims of domestic violence, persons being evicted, and persons with severe mental health disorders or substance abuse histories. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 372 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 147 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) In response to the HEARTH Act and 24 CFR part 576, Collier County, in collaboration with its subrecipients are working together to prevent homelessness by helping families remain within their communities and retain their current permanent housing or diverting people to permanent housing solutions. The first step in this process was to streamline the intake of homeless families seeking emergency shelter. The improved coordination will result in more families being diverted away from homelessness and more families exiting homelessness and being rapidly re-housed in permanent housing. Helping homeless persons (especially chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth) make the transition to permanent housing and independent living, including shortening the period of time that individuals and families experience homelessness, facilitating access for homeless individuals and families to affordable housing units, and preventing individuals and families who were recently homeless from becoming homeless again. The County will continue to administer the Emergency Solutions Grants (ESG) and oversee activities for homeless individuals and families. The County has identified rapid re-housing as a priority during the next Consolidated Plan period. Obtaining permanent housing for homeless individuals and families will shorten the length of time spent in emergency and transitional shelters. Collier County encourages collaboration with organizations to transition as many people as possible into permanent housing as quickly as possible. The County also supports the implementation of coordinated entry process to assess and direct the homeless and people with mental illness to appropriate housing and services. Some families or individuals may require only limited assistance for a short period of time, such as emergency food and shelter -- until a first paycheck is received or a medical emergency has passed. Others will require more comprehensive and long-term assistance, such as transitional housing with supportive services and job training. Due to limited resources, it is important for agencies to eliminate duplication of effort by local agencies, both in assessment procedures and in subsequent housing and supportive services. The Homeless Management Information System (HMIS) can be improved with common intake forms, shared data, effective assessment instruments and procedures, and on-going coordination of assistance among community organizations. Help low-income individuals and families avoid becoming homeless, especially extremely low- income individuals and families who are likely to become homeless after being discharged from a publicly funded institution or system of care, or who are receiving assistance from public and private agencies that address housing, health, social services, employment, education, or youth needs Diversion to housing and services outside of the traditional homeless services system is an integral part of helping families to avoid becoming homeless. Through a coordinated system, service providers will work with families to identify other housing options available for the household rather than accessing shelter through the homeless system. For example, family or friends that the client may be able to stay with while stabilizing their housing situation, which 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 373 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 148 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) may be more beneficial for the household and simultaneously reserves homeless shelter resources for those with no other options. SP-65 Lead based paint Hazards – 91.215(i)y Actions to address LBP hazards and increase access to housing without LBP hazards Collier County will continue to implement countermeasures to reduce lead-based paint hazards by abating or removing lead-based paint hazards found in existing housing built prior to 1978. Collier County educates the public on the hazards of lead-based paint and educates parents about protecting their children. In response to lead-based paint hazards and the limited resources available, the County will plan a steady, long-term response in accordance with Federal lead- based paint standards, other applicable federal regulations, and local property standards. The County will identify houses with lead-based paint through the various housing programs undertaken by the County and will abate or remove lead hazards in high priority units. Government assisted housing rehabilitation projects will include the completion of a lead-based paint inspection according to HUD and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) guidelines. Policies and procedures for abatement of lead hazards have been established in Collier County, which include determining cost effectiveness for abatement and procedures for assessing, contracting, and inspecting post-abatement work. The policies and procedures also include preparing work write-ups and costs estimates for all income eligible persons in Collier County with identified lead-based paint hazards. How are the actions listed above related to the extent of lead poisoning and hazards? Lead poisoning is the leading environmental hazard to children, creating devastating and irreversible health problems. The leading cause of lead-based poisoning is exposure to dust from deteriorating paint in homes constructed before 1978. This is due to the high lead content used in paint during that period, and particularly in homes built before 1950. Pre-1978 housing occupied by lower income households with children offers particularly high risks of lead exposure due to the generally lower levels of home maintenance among lower income households. This is an important factor since it is not the lead paint itself that causes the hazards, but rather the deterioration of the paint that releases lead-contaminated dust and allows children to peel and eat lead-contaminated flakes. How are the actions listed above integrated into housing policies and procedures? Collier County policies and procedures call for full compliance with the lead-based paint regulations at 24 CFR Part 35. Contractors, subrecipients, and other community partners are advised of the lead-based paint regulations and the County works with them to ensure inspection, testing, and abatement of lead hazards wherever necessary. Additionally, the County distributes information and literature on lead hazards to households who may be at risk of exposure. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 374 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 149 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) SP-70 Anti-Poverty Strategy – 91.215(j) Jurisdiction Goals, Programs and Policies for reducing the number of Poverty-Level Families Collier County has a Business and Economic Division that provides help with business relocation and expansion. This Division has partnered with several local economic development agencies, including the Small Business Development Center, which helps with small business start-ups, Career Source of Southwest Florida to help with job training and employment services, and Naples Chamber of Commerce. The local community college provides additional classes and training related to small business development and implementation and job training programs. Life skills, employment, and job training activities are offered in areas with high concentrations of low-income residents including Immokalee, and there are two targeted CRAs in the Bayshore- Gateway Triangle Area and Immokalee. How are the Jurisdiction poverty reducing goals, programs, and policies coordinated with this affordable housing plan Some of the jurisdiction’s poverty reduction programs and the affordable housing programs detailed in this plan are managed by Collier County, allowing for strong coordination of program offerings, performance goals, and policies. SP-80 Monitoring – 91.230 Describe the standards and procedures that the jurisdiction will use to monitor activities carried out in furtherance of the plan and will use to ensure long-term compliance with requirements of the programs involved, including minority business outreach and the comprehensive planning requirements Subrecipients will receive information on federal and local regulations relating to their specific activity, along with an explanation as to how they apply to the project. Specific performance objectives will be outlined within each subrecipient agreement, giving measurable objectives for the eligible activity to be carried out. Each project is monitored on an ongoing basis and all preconstruction conferences are attended by division staff. Prior to any contracting, CHS staff reviews program requirements with prospective subrecipients, including emphasis on conflict of interest and special requirements for each subrecipient’s specific agreement. This process ensures subrecipients are fully aware of program requirements. Documentation submitted with reimbursement requests is reviewed for compliance with applicable regulations and measurable objectives prior to issuing funds. On-site monitoring of selected subrecipients is scheduled by the County and conducted by the CHS Grant Monitoring Team using an enhanced monitoring checklist. The Monitoring Team is typically composed of the Compliance Supervisor, the Project Grant Coordinator, the Monitoring Operations Analyst, and a Senior Accountant. This team is charged with providing a progress monitoring visit and evaluation and a second visit at final project closeout (the timing of which 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 375 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 150 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) are subject to change based on current divisional policies). The specific number of monitoring visits each funded entity receives is based on a risk evaluation, but every project will have a closeout monitoring. Projects still under construction for more than a year are also monitored until the project is complete. Projects are reviewed to ensure all aspects of the activity are carried out in accordance with applicable regulations. After a monitoring visit, CHS sends a follow-up letter to the subrecipient stating the outcome of the monitoring. Where required by the monitoring outcome, Corrective Action Plans are developed and the subrecipient’s compliance with the Corrective Action Plan is reviewed until the plan is satisfied. After the Corrective Action Plan is satisfied and all monitoring findings are cleared, CHS closes out the monitoring with a letter to the subrecipient identifying future compliance requirements and reporting responsibilities. In addition to the above, any subrecipient determined to be in need of and/or requesting additional training on how to meet grantee and federal requirements receives technical assistance (TA) in the form deemed most appropriate to the circumstances. The County has developed written policies and procedures that are in place for all federal grant programs. CHS continues to monitor and assist subrecipients to become aware of and knowledgeable about all grant requirements. Additionally, CHS provides TA to achieve compliance with all federal requirements and holds a quarterly partnership meeting with each subrecipient to ensure successful project completion. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 376 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 151 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Expected Resources AP-15 Expected Resources – 91.220(c)(1,2) Introduction Collier County Entitlement grant resources totaling $4,567,555.47 are anticipated for the FY2021 to meet underserved needs, foster decent affordable housing, develop institutional structure, and enhance coordination between public and private housing and social service agencies. Along with the County’s 2021 annual CDBG, HOME, and ESG allocations, this figure includes $134,787.17 in prior year CDBG funds and $666,127.30 in prior year HOME funds that will be reprogrammed for use this year. Additionally, this figure includes an estimated $29,000 in CDBG program income and $31,571 in HOME program income. In the prior program year, the County received CDBG-CV and ESG-CV funds to assist eligible individuals and families facing hardships due to the COVID-19 pandemic. CDBG-CV funds were allocated towards economic development activities such as small business loans to assist businesses that have been negatively affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. CDBG-CV funds were also allocated to the purchase of medical equipment such as personal protective equipment and testing. ESG-CV funds were utilized for expanded rapid re-housing and homeless prevention activities. The County continues to assess the effectiveness of these allocated funds and will work to ensure that the funds are utilized to optimal efficiency. Additional resources available to Collier County in this program year include State Housing Initiative Partnership (SHIP) funding of approximately $2,500,000 which is used for a wide range of rehabilitation, rental housing, and homeownership assistance. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 377 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 152 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Anticipated Resources Program Source of Funds Uses of Funds Expected Amount Available Year 1 Expected Amount Available Remainder of Con Plan $ Narrative Description Annual Allocation: $ Program Income: $ Prior Year Resources: $ Total: $ CDBG Public – Federal - Public services - Infrastructure and facility improvements - Housing - Economic Development - Administration - Fair Housing $2,744,274 $29,000 $134,787.17 $2,908,061.17 $11,093,096 Anticipated Year 1 funding will include entitlement grant funds, program income, and prior year unallocated funds HOME Public – Federal - Homebuyer assistance - Rental or homeowner rehab - Rental or homeownership new construction - Acquisition - Tenant-based rental assistance - Administration $753,000 $31,571 $666,127.30 $1,450,698.30 $3,138,284 Anticipated Year 1 funding will include entitlement grant funds, program income, and prior year unallocated funds ESG Public – Federal - Shelter Operations - Rapid Re-Housing - Homelessness Prevention - HMIS - Administration $217,796 $0 $0 $217,796.00 $871,184.00 Anticipated Year 1 funding will include entitlement grant funds Table 52 - Expected Resources – Priority Table 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 378 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 153 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Explain how federal funds will leverage those additional resources (private, state, and local funds), including a description of how matching requirements will be satisfied. Projects selected for funding by Collier County leverage additional community resources, including public and private agency funds. Although the CDBG program does not require a match from non-federal sources, monies dedicated to infrastructure improvements capitalize on ongoing revitalization efforts by the Bayshore and Immokalee Community Redevelopment Agencies (CRAs). Facility improvements for nonprofit organizations enhance their ability to provide services to their clients or residents. Public service funds are granted to agencies with additional public and/or private funding streams that provide a variety of services in addition to those supported by CDBG funds. For example, several nonprofits receive state funds through the Department of Children and Families to support CDBG-funded programs. In recent years, subrecipients also had large private donors who made cash donations. Both the HOME and ESG programs have matching funds requirements. The HOME program match will be provided from organizations that receive HOME funding during FY2021 in in-kind contributions and other non-federal sources to fund the operations supporting the HOME funded program. The County may also satisfy the HOME match through the State Housing Initiative Program (SHIP). The ESG program requires the County provide a 1:1 match. The County plans to fund the Shelter for Abused Women and Children and the subrecipient will provide match through payment of costs associated with shelter operations such as program staff salaries. NAMI’s rapid re-housing and the HMIS activity will also provide required match. Additionally, the County pays the salaries of County staff to contribute to match requirements form HUD. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 379 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 154 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) If appropriate, describe publicly owned land or property located within the jurisdiction that may be used to address the needs identified in the plan Florida Statues Section 125.379, Disposition of County property for affordable housing, requires that counties create an inventory of real property with fee simple title appropriate for affordable housing. Collier County maintains the inventory of County-owned surplus land through its Real Property Division. Locally, the disposition of surplus land is governed by Resolution 2007-172 and Resolution 2010-123, which direct the County to sell the land and use the proceeds to increase financial resources set-aside for affordable housing. The County identified two publicly owned parcels suitable for new housing construction and released an RFP for their sale and development in fall 2018. One parcel, known as Bembridge, released an Invitation to Negotiate for the development of affordable housing in spring 2019. The Bembridge property developer will receive Florida Housing Finance Authority funding to construct 82 new rental units in 2021. The project has completed all zoning activities required for construction to begin. The project is expected to commence in late 2021. In 2019, the County acquired 60+ acres in Golden Gate City. As part of this acquisition the County has obligated 40ac to affordable housing. In 2020 the County released an RFP, and a nonprofit developer was selected. This project includes a 10M private donation to support the project. The County will contribute the land to project. In addition, the County Board of Commissioners recently adopted Resolution 2018-39, which encourages the co-location of housing and public facilities when the County acquires future property. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 380 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 155 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) AP-20 Annual Goals and Objectives Goal Descriptions • Support New Construction, Rehabilitation, or Acquisition of Affordable Housing for Homeownership – Funds will be used to support new construction, rehabilitation, or acquisition of affordable housing for homeownership. • Support New Construction, Rehabilitation, or Acquisition of Affordable Rental Housing – Funds will be used to support new construction, rehabilitation, or acquisition of affordable housing for rental housing. • Tenant Based Rental Assistance – Funds will be used to provide rental subsidies to low-income persons, elderly, frail elderly, disabled, and veterans. • Support Emergency Shelter and Services for the Homeless – Funds will be used to provide emergency shelter services and permanent housing for homeless persons. • HMIS Support – Funds will be used to collect client-level data and data on the provision of housing and services to homeless individuals and families and persons at risk of homelessness. • Provide Homelessness Prevention - Funds will be used to provide permanent housing to prevent persons from becoming homeless. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 381 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 156 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Goals Summary Information Sort Order Goal Name Start Year End Year Category Geographic Area Needs Addressed Funding Goal Outcome Indicator 1 CDBG Administration & Planning 2021 2022 Other Countywide Provide Administration & Planning CDBG: $554,654 ESG: $16,334.70 HOME: $78,295.30 Other: Planning & Administration: CDBG: 1; HOME: 1; ESG: 1 2 Support New Construction, Rehabilitation, or Acquisition of Affordable Rental Housing 2021 2022 Affordable Housing Countywide Housing Affordability CDBG: $500,000 Rental Units constructed: 80 3 Improve Public Infrastructure 2021 2022 Non-Housing Community Development Countywide Public Infrastructure Improvements CDBG: $183,676 Public facility or infrastructure activities other than low/moderate- income housing benefit: 1,125 4 Improve Public and Other Facilities 2021 2022 Non- Housing Community Development Countywide Public Facilities CDBG: $248,380.00 Public facility or infrastructure activities other than low/moderate- income housing benefit: 180 5 Support New Construction, Rehabilitation, or Acquisition of Affordable Rental Housing 2021 2022 Affordable Housing Countywide Housing Affordability CDBG: $1,079,000.00 HOME: $400,000.00 Rental Units Rehabilitated: 52 Rental Units Acquired: 1 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 382 Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 157 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) 6 Provide Public Services 2021 2022 Community Development Countywide Public Services CDBG: $348,351.17 Public service activities for other than Low/Moderate Income Housing Benefit: 260 7 Support New Construction, Rehabilitation, or Acquisition of Affordable Housing for Homeownership 2021 2022 Affordable Housing Countywide Housing Affordability HOME: $872,403 Homeowner Housing Added: 8 8 Support Emergency Shelter and Services for the Homeless 2021 2022 Homeless Countywide Homelessness & Homelessness Prevention ESG: $100,000.00 Homeless Person Overnight Shelter: 120 9 HMIS Support 2021 2022 Other Countywide Homelessness & Homelessness Prevention ESG: $40,000 Other: HMIS support 3 10 Provide Homelessness Prevention 2021 2022 Homeless Special Needs Countywide Homelessness & Homelessness Prevention ESG: $61,461.30 Homelessness Prevention: TBD 11 Tenant Based Rental Assistance 2021 2022 Affordable Housing Countywide Homelessness & Homelessness Prevention HOME $100,000 Tenant-based Rental Assistance/ Rapid Rehousing: 4 Table 53 – Goals Summary 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 383 Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 158 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Projects AP-35 Projects – 91.220(d) Introduction For FY 2021-2022, Collier County will fund a total of 12 projects under the CDBG, HOME, and ESG programs, identified below with additional details provided in Section AP-38. Please note that funding levels and goal outcome indicators are estimates for planning purposes. Payments to subrecipients for individual projects and/or activities are not contingent on meeting annual outcome indicators shown below. Subrecipient award amounts may not match those in the applications submitted to the County, as not all projects were funded at requested levels. Recommended activities are eventually finalized in a legal agreement approved by the Board of County Commissioners and the subrecipients. The agreement is considered to contain the final activity description including funding levels, scope elements, deliverables and beneficiaries and supersedes any prior information such as the application or this action plan. CDBG projects include public services, public facility, and public infrastructure improvements. Under the HOME program, the County will fund, acquisition, and/or rehabilitation of affordable housing and a tenant-based rental assistance program. ESG activities include emergency shelter operations support and administration. The administrative costs of the CDBG, HOME, and ESG projects are also included as projects and represent 20%, 10%, and 7.5% of annual allocations, respectively. In the event that any of the activities identified in the project list and descriptions do not perform as anticipated and grant funds are returned, or in the event that additional funds become available, the County reserves the right to reprogram those funds for use in a TBRA, Down Payment and Closing Cost Assistance program for low- and moderate-income households. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 384 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 159 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Projects # Project Name 1 CDBG Collier County CDBG Administration & Planning 2 CDBG Casa San Juan Diego - National Development 3 CDBG Sunrise Group 4 CDBG Collier County Housing Authority – HVAC Installation 5 CDBG Collier County Housing Authority – Rental Acquisition 6 CDBG Shelter for Abused Women & Children 7 CDBG City of Naples 8 CDBG Sunrise Group 9 CDBG Legal Aid 10 CDBG Project HELP 11 HOME Habitat for Humanity 12 HOME Collier County HOME Administration & Planning 13 HOME Wounded Warrior Project 14 ESG Shelter for Abused Women 15 ESG Collier County ESG Administration & Planning Table 54 – Project Information Describe the reasons for allocation priorities and any obstacles to addressing underserved needs. The County has pursued a variety of strategies to impact the identified needs of the community, the primary obstacle to meeting the underserved needs is the lack of sufficient financial resources. Annually several project proposals may be unfunded or receive only partial funding due to lack of available resources. Allocation priorities for the FY 2021-2022 Action Plan are consistent with those outlined in the Strategic Plan portion of the County’s 2021-2025 Consolidated Plan. The priorities were identified through a review of market conditions as well as a needs assessment that analyzed affordable housing, special need housing, homeless, and non-housing community development needs in Collier County. Substantial participation by residents, local and regional organizations, and other stakeholders also informed these priorities. The Consolidated Plan and the Needs Assessment conducted as part of the Consolidated Planning process identified affordable for-sale and rental housing as a top need in Collier County. Housing affordability was the most common issue identified by interviewees and community meeting participants throughout the county, including in Naples and Immokalee. Further, according to Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) data, about 19% of all households in the county spend more than 30% of their income on housing. For low- and moderate-income households, about 75% of renters and 65% of owners spend over 30% of income on housing. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 385 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 160 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) The County made its funding decisions for this Action Plan based on need, geographic priorities, and opportunities to work with subrecipients and other partners that contribute additional resources to leverage federal funds. The main obstacle to addressing underserved needs is the shortage of financial resources to address Collier County’s priorities. In the event of natural disasters, pandemics, and other worldwide crisis events (natural or manmade), the County may substantially amend the projects in this Plan to meet the immediate needs of the community. It is the responsibility of the County to plan ahead and be disaster prepared. For example, in the event of hurricanes the County may reprioritize from normal activities to focus on infrastructure and facilities improvements, or increase public services, where allowable, in the case of a pandemic or other natural disaster. Under the State SHIP program, the county has an existing Disaster Assistance Strategy that goes into effect when a disaster declaration has been declared by the President or the Governor. Collier County will also take advantage of federal waivers that may be issued from time to time in the event of declared disasters. In April 2020, the County identified HUD CDBG, ESG and HOME waivers that it was electing to use in addressing the Coronavirus pandemic. Collier County will continue to take advantage of all appropriate CDBG, ESG and HOME waivers as they become available 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 386 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 161 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) AP-38 Project Summary Project Summary Information No. Project Goals Supported Geographic Areas Needs Addressed Funding 1 Collier County CDBG Administration & Planning CDBG Planning and Administration Countywide CDBG Planning & Administration CDBG: $548,854.00 Description CDBG Program Administration & Planning Target Date for Completion 9/30/2022 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities (additional information for this discussion may be available on the AP-36 Project Detail screen) 1 Location Description activities (additional information for this discussion may be available on the AP- 36 Project Detail screen) County Wide Planned Activities (additional information for this discussion may be available on the AP-36 Project Detail screen) CDBG funds will be used for administrative and planning activities. 2 Casa San Juan Diego - National Development Support New Construction, Rehabilitation, or Acquisition of Affordable Rental Housing Countywide Housing Affordability CDBG: $500,000.00 Description Subrecipient will utilize CDBG funds to support the development of 80 affordable housing rental units in Immokalee Target Date for Completion 9/30/2022 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 387 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 162 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities 80 low-mod households (additional information for this discussion may be available on the AP- 36 Project Detail screen) Location Description activities (additional information for this discussion may be available on the AP- 36 Project Detail screen) County Wide Planned Activities (additional information for this discussion may be available on the AP-36 Project Detail screen) Phase 1: Preliminary engineering, architectural design & permitting. 3 Sunrise Group Public Facility Improvement Countywide Public Facility Improvement CDBG: $56,369.76 Description Subrecipient will utilize CDBG funds for facility improvements. The County will allocate prior year CDBG funding. Target Date for Completion 9/30/2022 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities 60 individuals with disabilities (additional information for this discussion may be available on the AP- 36 Project Detail screen) Location Description (additional information for this discussion may be available on the AP-36 Project Detail screen) Countywide Planned Activities (additional information for this discussion may be available on the AP-36 Project Detail screen) Public Facility Improvements 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 388 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 163 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) 4 Collier County Housing Authority Affordable Housing: HVAC Installation Countywide Housing Affordability CDBG: $500,000.00 Description Subrecipient will utilize CDBG funds for public facility improvements: HVAC Installation Target Date for Completion 9/30/2022 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities (additional information for this discussion may be available on the AP-36 Project Detail screen) 50 households Location Description (additional information for this discussion may be available on the AP-36 Project Detail screen) Countywide Planned Activities (additional information for this discussion may be available on the AP-36 Project Detail screen) Subrecipient will utilize CDBG funds for support affordable housing: HVAC Installation 5 Collier County Housing Authority Rental Acquisition Countywide Affordable Housing CDBG: $579,000.00 Description Subrecipient will utilize CDBG funds for rental acquisition for low-income households Target Date for Completion 9/30/2022 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities (additional information for this discussion may be available on the AP-36 Project Detail screen) 2 households Location Description (additional information for this discussion may be Countywide 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 389 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 164 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) available on the AP-36 Project Detail screen) Planned Activities (additional information for this discussion may be available on the AP-36 Project Detail screen) Subrecipient will utilize CDBG funds for rental acquisition for low-income households 6 Shelter for Abused Women & Children Public Facility Improvement Countywide Public Facility Improvement CDBG: $51,223.07 Description Subrecipient will utilize CDBG funds for security enhancement. The County will allocate prior year funding. Target Date for Completion 9/30/2022 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities (additional information for this discussion may be available on the AP-36 Project Detail screen) 120 victims of domestic violence (additional information for this discussion may be available on the AP- 36 Project Detail screen) Location Description (additional information for this discussion may be available on the AP-36 Project Detail screen) Countywide Planned Activities (additional information for this discussion may be available on the AP-36 Project Detail screen) Security Enhancement 7 City of Naples Infrastructure & Improvement Countywide Public Facility CDBG: $183,676.00 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 390 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 165 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Description Subrecipient will utilize CDBG funds for streetlight replacement in Census Tract 0007.00. The County will allocate prior year funding. Target Date for Completion 9/30/2022 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities (additional information for this discussion may be available on the AP-36 Project Detail screen) 1125 low-mod income persons. Location Description (additional information for this discussion may be available on the AP-36 Project Detail screen) City of Naples Planned Activities (additional information for this discussion may be available on the AP-36 Project Detail screen) Subrecipient will utilize CDBG funds for streetlight replacement in low-income areas 8 Sunrise Group Public Services Countywide Public Services CDBG: $98,000.00 Description Subrecipient will utilize CDBG funds for transportation. Target Date for Completion 9/30/2022 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities 60 persons with disabilities Location Description (additional information for this discussion may be available on the AP-36 Project Detail screen) Countywide Planned Activities (additional information for this discussion may be available on the AP-36 Project Detail screen) Subrecipient will utilize CDBG funds for transportation of disabled persons. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 391 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 166 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) 9 Legal Aid Public Services Countywide Public Services CDBG: $158,351.17 Description Subrecipient will utilize CDBG funds for services to victims Target Date for Completion 9/30/2022 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities 100 Victims Served (additional information for this discussion may be available on the AP- 36 Project Detail screen) Location Description Countywide (additional information for this discussion may be available on the AP- 36 Project Detail screen) Planned Activities Subrecipient will utilize CDBG funds for legal services to victims. (additional information for this discussion may be available on the AP- 36 Project Detail screen) 10 Project HELP Public Services Countywide Public Services CDBG: $92,000.00 Description Subrecipient will utilize CDBG funds for a mobile forensic unit. Target Date for Completion 9/30/2022 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities 80 Persons Served (additional information for this discussion may be available on the AP- 36 Project Detail screen) Location Description Countywide (additional information for this discussion may be available on the AP- 36 Project Detail screen) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 392 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 167 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Planned Activities Subrecipient will utilize CDBG funds for a mobile forensic unit for victims of violence and trafficking (additional information for this discussion may be available on the AP- 36 Project Detail screen) 11 Habitat for Humanity Affordable Housing Countywide Affordable Housing HOME: $306,275.70 Description Subrecipient will utilize HOME funds to acquire scattered sites for new construction. The County will allocate $566,127.30 in 2019 and 2020 prior year funding. Target Date for Completion 9/30/2022 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities 8 units (additional information for this discussion may be available on the AP- 36 Project Detail screen) Location Description Countywide (additional information for this discussion may be available on the AP- 36 Project Detail screen) Planned Activities Subrecipient will utilize HOME funds to acquire scattered sites for new construction. (additional information for this discussion may be available on the AP- 36 Project Detail screen) (additional information for this discussion may be available on the AP- 36 Project Detail screen) 13 Wounded Warriors Affordable Housing Countywide Affordable Housing HOME: $400,000.00 Description Subrecipient will utilize HOME funds to fund veteran housing. Target Date for Completion 9/30/2022 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities 1 household 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 393 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 168 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) (additional information for this discussion may be available on the AP- 36 Project Detail screen) Location Description Countywide (additional information for this discussion may be available on the AP- 36 Project Detail screen) Planned Activities Subrecipient will utilize HOME funds to acquire rental housing (additional information for this discussion may be available on the AP- 36 Project Detail screen) 14 Collier County HOME Administration & Planning HOME Planning and Administration Countywide HOME Planning and Administration HOME: $46,724.30 Description HOME Planning and Administration Target Date for Completion 9/30/2022 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities 1 (additional information for this discussion may be available on the AP- 36 Project Detail screen) Location Description Countywide (additional information for this discussion may be available on the AP- 36 Project Detail screen) Planned Activities HOME Planning and Administration (additional information for this discussion may be available on the AP- 36 Project Detail screen) 15 Shelter for Abused Women Emergency Shelter Countywide Emergency Shelter ESG: $100,000.00 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 394 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 169 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Description Subrecipient will utilize ESG funds for emergency shelter operations Target Date for Completion 9/30/2022 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities 120 victims of domestic violence (additional information for this discussion may be available on the AP- 36 Project Detail screen) Location Description Countywide (additional information for this discussion may be available on the AP- 36 Project Detail screen) Planned Activities Subrecipient will utilize ESG funds for emergency operations (additional information for this discussion may be available on the AP- 36 Project Detail screen) 16 Collier County ESG Administration & Planning ESG Administration & Planning Countywide ESG Administration & Planning ESG: $16,335.70 Description ESG Administration & Planning Target Date for Completion 9/30/2022 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities 1 (additional information for this discussion may be available on the AP- 36 Project Detail screen) Location Description Countywide (additional information for this discussion may be available on the AP- 36 Project Detail screen) Planned Activities ESG Administration & Planning 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 395 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 170 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) (additional information for this discussion may be available on the AP- 36 Project Detail screen) 17 ESG Uncommitted HMIS/Homeless Prevention and Rapid Re-housing Countywide HMIS/Homeless Prevention and Rapid Re- housing ESG: $101,460.30 Description HMIS/Homeless Prevention and Rapid Re-housing Target Date for Completion 9/30/2022 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities TBD (additional information for this discussion may be available on the AP- 36 Project Detail screen) Location Description Countywide (additional information for this discussion may be available on the AP- 36 Project Detail screen) Planned Activities HMIS/Homeless Prevention and Rapid Re-housing (additional information for this discussion may be available on the AP- 36 Project Detail screen) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 396 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 171 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) AP-50 Geographic Distribution – 91.220(f) Description of the geographic areas of the entitlement (including areas of low-income and minority concentration) where assistance will be directed. Collier County is an urban county that relies on widely accepted data such as American Community Survey (ACS), HUD low and moderate-income summary data, and Federal Financial Institutions Examinations Council (FFIEC) data to determine areas throughout the community with concentrations of low and moderate-income communities. Program resources are allocated County-wide based on low-mod areas which often coincide with areas of minority concentration. Over the next year, the County intends to utilize CDBG, HOME, and ESG funds in unincorporated parts of the County and the City of Naples. Marco Island, an incorporated city within the County, opted out of participation in 2012. Over the next program year, the County anticipates spending 96% of its CDBG funds and in Immokalee HVAC improvements to rental housing and infrastructure development and 4% in Naples undertaking , street light replacement, Countywide project include rental acquisitions, shelter security enhancements, transportation services, victim services, acquisition of affordable housing and veteran housing. Geographic Distribution Target Area Percentage of Funds City of Naples 4% Immokalee 18% Collier County- Countywide 78% Table 55 - Geographic Distribution Rationale for the priorities for allocating investments geographically. Collier County targets resources in low-moderate income census block groups to meet regulatory requirements for CDBG grant funds and to target areas with the highest level of needs. Maps provided show Collier County block groups where 51% or more of the population have incomes at or below 80% of the area median income. These areas are considered “target areas” for use of HUD grant funds for area improvements, such as public infrastructure or facility improvements. HUD funds may also be spent outside of these targeted areas, as long as they provide services, improvements, affordable housing, or other benefits for low- and moderate-income households or special needs populations. The following map depict the low- and moderate-income block groups within Collier County. The low-income block groups identified in the map below will generally be prioritized for allocation of Consolidated Plan resources, however, individual low- and moderate-income persons residing anywhere in Collier County may be eligible beneficiaries of CDBG funds. The 2017 Tax Cut and Jobs Act established the Opportunity Zone program. Opportunity zones are low- income census tracts nominated by the Governor of the state to spur private investment for economic 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 397 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 172 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) development and job creation in the designated tracts. Collier County has five census tracts that are certified by the State as Opportunity Zones (census tracts 104.11, 108.02, 112.05, 113.01, and 114). HUD encouraged grantees to consider using their CDBG, HOME, and ESG funds for eligible activities in Opportunity Zones in CPD-19-01: Guidance on Submitting Consolidated Plans and Annual Action Plans. The County's Opportunity Zones overlap with census tracts within two of the CDBG target areas. For FY 2020-2021, the County anticipates funding two public facility projects in these census tract target areas. As the Opportunity Zone program regulations are finalized, the County will explore how the CPD funds can be used to leverage Opportunity Zone funding to these areas. Source: HUD CPD Mapping Tool, https://egis.hud.gov/cpdmaps/ Affordable Housing AP-55 Affordable Housing – 91.220(g) Introduction Collier County partners with the Collier County Housing Authority (CCHA) and several non-profit agencies to assist in projects designed to provide affordable rental and homeowner housing, 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 398 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 173 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) including assistance to people with disabilities and homeless individuals and families. The special needs population will be served through grants to local service providers. The homeless population will be served through assistance grants to local service providers. To address these needs, the County will use HOME, ESG, and CDBG funds to support the development of new affordable units and the rehabilitation of existing units. One Year Goals for the Number of Households to be Supported Homeless 120 Non-Homeless 25 Special-Needs 3 Total 150 Table 56 - One Year Goals for Affordable Housing by Support Requirement One Year Goals for the Number of Households Supported Through Rental Assistance 0 The Production of New Units 4 Rehab of Existing Units 50 Acquisition of Existing Units 3 Total 57 Table 57 - One Year Goals for Affordable Housing by Support Type Discussion: Rent Reasonableness allows Collier County to provide housing for units up to 10% over the Fair Market Rent rate. AP-60 Public Housing – 91.220(h) Introduction The Collier County Housing Authority (CCHA) is an independent authority established under state law, is separate from the general control of the County, and operates no HUD-funded public housing units. The Collier County Housing Authority is not required by a Section 504 Voluntary Compliance Agreement to increase the number of accessible units. The CCHA owns and manages 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 399 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 174 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) public housing developments, including low-income and farm labor housing at Farm Worker Village, farm labor housing at Collier Village, a 192-bed dormitory called Horizon Village, and some scattered site housing. Farm Worker Village is a multi-family low-income and farm labor housing development in Immokalee built under the USDA 514/516 Program. The development includes 176 total acres with 591 housing units, ranging from single-family homes to duplexes and quadraplexes. Farm Worker Village has a main office, convenience store, laundromat, community center, playground, and two daycare centers. Horizon Village offers 192 beds for unaccompanied migrants and seasonal farmworkers in dormitory- style efficiency units, each with space for 8 people, a common kitchen area with appliances, and two bathrooms. A meeting room is available to provide social and educational programs. The Housing Authority also administers approximately 440 Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers. Unlike most public housing authorities, CCHA has no HUD-funded public housing units. Their primary funding is from USDA. Actions planned during the next year to address the needs to public housing. The CCHA has also applied for rehabilitation grant through the Collier County Community and Human Services Division to rehab older units located at Farmworker Village. This project will provide HVAC to 50 units. In 2019-2020, CCHA received a HOME grant to rehabilitate 52 units at Farm Worker village. In addition, CCHA has been awarded funds for the acquisition of rental property to support 2 households during this grant cycle. Actions to encourage public housing residents to become more involved in management and participate in homeownership. The CCHA also sponsors and supports self-sufficiency programs focused at helping their residents improve their economic situation and quality of living. The programs, ROSS and FSS, are voluntary self-sufficiency programs that provide participating families the opportunity to identify needs, improve skill sets, and work towards life goals, economic independence, and housing self- sufficiency programs provide families with: • A plan specifically tailored to their family or individual goals. • A link to community organizations geared towards education, job training and placement programs, computer and financial literacy, and increased self-sufficiency. • An advocate and supporter to help residents work through barriers preventing self- sufficiency. If the PHA is designated as troubled, describe the manner in which financial assistance will be provided or other assistance. The Collier County Housing Authority is not designated as troubled and is considered a high performer. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 400 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 175 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) AP-65 Homeless and Other Special Needs Activities – 91.220(i) Introduction Collier County’s 2021-2025 Consolidated Plan identifies increasing housing options for homeless and at risk of homelessness as a strategic priority. Long-term objectives include supporting emergency housing and supportive services, and the implementation of a coordinated entry system. The 2021 ESG allocation will fund emergency shelter and prevention services that are projected to assist homeless and at-risk of homeless beneficiaries. The identified projects target homeless individuals and families who lack the resources to independently regain stable housing. Programs are designed to connect clients with the services necessary to ensure they move from emergency shelter to transitional or permanent housing. Describe the jurisdictions one-year goals and actions for reducing and ending homelessness including Collier County will utilize Emergency Solutions Grants funding for Emergency Shelter, Homelessness Prevention, Rapid Re-Housing, HMIS administration, and ESG program administration. Funding for these programs is projected to benefit homeless persons and those at risk of homelessness. Projects selected for funding are designed to help shorten the period the client experiences homelessness, improve their ability to secure stable housing, and prevent recurrent homeless episodes. Reaching out to homeless persons (especially unsheltered persons) and assessing their individual needs Collier County funds subrecipients that administer homelessness projects under the ESG program. They work to build trusting relationships with homeless persons living on the streets and in shelters as well as at-risk populations to remain stably housed. The subrecipients perform assessments for homeless persons and those at risk of homelessness to link them to shelter and other supportive services that are appropriate to meet their needs. All subrecipients funded through Collier County ESG will participate in coordinated entry. These organizations provide emergency shelter, rental and utility assistance, food and clothing, and other homeless services to individuals, families with children, veterans, unaccompanied youth, and including persons with HIV. Addressing the emergency shelter and transitional housing needs of homeless persons Collier County currently awards its ESG entitlement funds to subrecipients for the operation of emergency shelters, financial assistance through rapid re-housing to become stably housed, and homeless prevention programs to serve individuals and families. Some emergency shelters and homeless prevention programs are designed to focus their services to the needs of specific populations such as families, victims of domestic violence, human trafficking victims, persons 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 401 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 176 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) being evicted, and persons with severe mental health disorders or substance abuse histories. In response to the HEARTH Act and 24 CFR part 576, Collier County, in collaboration with its subrecipients are working together to prevent homelessness by helping families remain within their communities and retain their current permanent housing or diverting people to permanent housing solutions. The first step in this process was to streamline the intake of homeless families seeking emergency shelter. The improved coordination will result in more families being diverted away from homelessness and more families exiting homelessness and being rapidly re-housed in permanent housing. Other than the funds available through this process, emergency shelter and transitional housing needs may be addressed through grant funding opportunities, such as the competitive Continuum of Care process, or through other state or local funding streams. Helping homeless persons (especially chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth) make the transition to permanent housing and independent living, including shortening the period of time that individuals and families experience homelessness, facilitating access for homeless individuals and families to affordable housing units, and preventing individuals and families who were recently homeless from becoming homeless again The County will continue to administer the Emergency Solutions Grants Program and oversee activities for homeless individuals and families. The County has identified rapid re-housing as a priority during the next Consolidated Plan period. Obtaining permanent housing for homeless individuals and families will shorten the length of time spent in emergency and transitional shelters. Collier County encourages collaboration with organizations to transition as many people as possible into permanent housing as quickly as possible. Some families or individuals may require only limited assistance for a short period of time, such as emergency food and shelter -- until a first paycheck is received or a medical emergency has passed. Others, however, will require more comprehensive and long-term assistance, such as transitional housing with supportive services and job training. Due to limited resources, it is important for agencies to eliminate duplication of effort by local agencies, both in intake and assessment procedures, and in subsequent housing and supportive services. The Homeless Management Information System (HMIS) can be improved with common intake forms, shared data, effective assessment instruments and procedures, and on-going coordination of assistance among community organizations. Helping low-income individuals and families avoid becoming homeless, especially extremely low-income individuals and families and those who are: being discharged from publicly funded institutions and systems of care (such as health care facilities, mental health facilities, foster care and other youth facilities, and corrections programs and institutions); or, receiving assistance from public or private agencies that address housing, health, social services, employment, education, or youth needs Collier County will continue to operate its rental assistance program in 2021-2022 to assist families and individuals to avoid becoming homeless. This program seeks to prevent 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 402 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 177 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) homelessness by providing up to a year of short-term rental assistance (including up to 6 months of rental arrearage), rental security deposits and last month’s rent, and/or costs such as rental application fees and utilities. AP-75 Barriers to affordable housing – 91.220(j) Introduction: The inventory of affordable housing in Collier County is not sufficient to meet the demand for affordable units. One of the primary challenges to creating and preserving affordable housing in Collier County is that household income is failing to keep up with rising housing costs. The local economy is focused on retail, hospitality, services, and agriculture; however, high housing costs have priced out much of the workforce needed for the county to function. Actions it planned to remove or ameliorate the negative effects of public policies that serve as barriers to affordable housing such as land use controls, tax policies affecting land, zoning ordinances, building codes, fees and charges, growth limitations, and policies affecting the return on residential investment Collier County faces a burgeoning issue in trying to identify, quantify and qualify new and existing affordable housing units. With a wider range of housing options, Collier County would be better equipped to tackle the affordable housing problem. The effort requires comprehensive strategies and a variety of tools that can be used alone or in combination to reduce costs and increase availability. During this consolidated plan period, Collier County will continue to Review and Revise the Land Development Code which, if done well will make it easier to implement necessary changes to encourage housing affordability. The current Land Development Code (LDC) does not consistently support and encourage growth in already existing urbanized areas of the county (those areas generally west of Collier Parkway). Many of the LDC’s ordinances are geared toward large-scale, planned-unit developments (PUDs) on greenfield sites. Conversely, smaller-scale redevelopment and infill sites in already developed areas of the county are challenging to consolidate, may need to address adjacent uses and neighborhood concerns, and often require additional density to make them financially feasible. Collier County can also consider reducing parking standards to achieve affordability, permitting guest houses as accessory dwelling rental unit, encouraging smart-site infrastructure, and identify strategic opportunity sites. AP-85 Other Actions – 91.220(k) Introduction: In addition to the programs and activities described on the prior sections of this plan, the County and its subrecipients intend to undertake a number of other actions to address housing needs and problems in Collier County. These include efforts to reduce the hazards of lead-based paint in housing; efforts to improve the physical condition and management of public housing, promote greater resident involvement in public housing management and create opportunities 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 403 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 178 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) for homeownership by public housing residents; and modify or mitigate the impact of any public policies which act as barriers to public housing, improvements to the institutional delivery structure to address any gaps or weaknesses identified in the Consolidated Plan. Actions planned to address obstacles to meeting underserved needs Collier County will collaborate with community leaders, stakeholders, and local non-profit agencies to help remove obstacles to better meet the needs of the underserved population and improve service delivery. The County will coordinate the work of non The County relies on agencies on nonprofit agencies to provide social services, disseminate news and information, and spearhead community-wide solutions to local needs. Collier County will also support the expansion of HMIS technology beyond homeless service providers as a way to link the various categories of services provided by our partner non-profit organizations and standardize performance measures. The County will also review and analyze the work of its various departments and divisions to find opportunities for collaboration between similar programs. Program staff will also ensure that all fair housing education materials are current and compliant with the Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Final Rule. Actions planned to foster and maintain affordable housing. Collier County will actively work to address the need for more decent and affordable housing by continuing to prioritize the investment of funds into all its housing programs. In the interest of preserving affordable housing, the County will continue to support the use of HOME program funds for activities such as: down-payment assistance, land acquisition, TBRA, and single/multifamily acquisitions and rehabilitation. Additionally, the County will continue to utilize CDBG program funds to rehabilitate owner-occupied homes. To promote fair housing choice, the County will encourage and support fair housing rights for all and provide program funds to conduct outreach and education regarding the Fair Housing Law act of 1968. Actions planned to reduce lead-based paint hazards. Collier County will continue to implement countermeasures to reduce lead-based paint hazards by abating or removing lead-based paint hazards found in existing housing built prior to 1978. Individuals who reside in properties built prior to 1978 and receive assistance through CDBG, ESG, or HOME grant programs are required to be inspected for lead-based paint hazards. These inspections are completed by a HUD Certified Inspector in accordance with HUD and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) guidelines. Collier County educates the public on the hazards of lead-based paint and how to protect children and the elderly. In response to lead- based paint hazards and the limited resources available, the County has planned a steady, long- term response in accordance with Federal lead-based paint standards, other applicable federal regulations, and local property standards. Policies and procedures for abatement of lead hazards have been established in Collier County, which include determining cost effectiveness for abatement and procedures for assessing, contracting, and inspecting post-abatement work. The policies and procedures also include preparing work write-ups and costs estimates for all income eligible persons in Collier County with identified lead-based paint hazards. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 404 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 179 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Actions planned to reduce the number of poverty-level families Collier County will continue to increase its efforts to implement anti-poverty strategies for the citizens of Collier. The County will strive to increase its efforts in assisting homeowners and renters with housing rehabilitation and renovation of affordable housing to decrease the financial burden on low-to-moderate-income persons. The County will employ the following strategies to reduce the number of poverty-level families: 1. Support the collaborative efforts of the service providers in Collier County to attract new business and industry to Collier. 2. Support the efforts of the Chamber of Commerce to target certain segments of the economy for business development/job creation. 3. Encourage nonprofit organizations to expand housing development programs to incorporate job-training opportunities as a part of their operations. 4. Promote the use of referral services for the existing Human Service Centers which involves a partnership with many human service agencies, including job referrals. 5. Provide assistance to the County’s CHDO to acquire and construct affordable rental housing for low/moderate income persons. 6. Participate in the development of a regional social service collaborative to coordinate the work of social service organizations, disseminate news and information, eliminate duplication of efforts, and spearhead community-wide solutions to local needs. 7. Use enhanced accomplishment data as a criterion in the evaluation of applications for ESG funding. 8. Support any expansion of local transit service and/or for express transit service. Through the initiatives described above, and in cooperation with the agencies and nonprofit organizations noted, the Community and Human Services Department will continue to assist low and moderate-income persons of Collier County over the next five years. Actions planned to develop institutional structure The Community and Human Services Department administers, plans, and manages all facets of the HUD grants for Collier County to ensure that all aspects of the grant programs perform in a concerted manner. The department will work as the housing and community development liaison between the county, local public housing, participating cities, state agencies, and non-profit and community-based organizations. Collier County recognizes the need to maintain a high level of coordination on projects involving other departments and/or non-profit organizations. This collaboration guarantees an efficient use of resources with maximum output in the form of accomplishments. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 405 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 180 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Actions planned to enhance coordination between public and private housing and social service agencies The County will work to foster collaboration through dissemination of services, news, and information across social service organizations, subcontractors, and public and private entities. One way the County will accomplish this is through subrecipient meetings that bring together affordable housing developers and social service agencies. Additionally, the countywide Affordable Housing Plan over the next year will require input from and coordination of both housing providers and social service agencies. The County will encourage community-based solutions and regional partnerships and will continue to support and participate in the CoC, whose membership includes both affordable housing and social service agencies. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 406 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 181 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Program Specific Requirements AP-90 Program Specific Requirements – 91.220(l)(1,2,4) Introduction: Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG) Reference 24 CFR 91.220(l)(1) Projects planned with all CDBG funds expected to be available during the year are identified in the Projects Table. The following identifies program income that is available for use that is included in projects to be carried out. 1. The total amount of program income that will have been received before the start of the next program year and that has not yet been reprogrammed. $29,000 2. The amount of proceeds from section 108 loan guarantees that will be used during the year to address the priority needs and specific objectives identified in the grantee's strategic plan $0 3. The amount of surplus funds from urban renewal settlements $0 4. The amount of any grant funds returned to the line of credit for which the planned use has not been included in a prior statement or plan. $0 5. The amount of income from float-funded activities $0 Total Program Income $0 Other CDBG Requirements 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 407 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 182 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) 1. The amount of urgent need activities $0 2. The estimated percentage of CDBG funds that will be used for activities that benefit persons of low and moderate income. Overall Benefit - A consecutive period of one, two or three years may be used to determine that a minimum overall benefit of 70% of CDBG funds is used to benefit persons of low and moderate income. Specify the years covered that include this Annual Action Plan. 80% HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME) Reference 24 CFR 91.220(l)(2) 1. A description of other forms of investment being used beyond those identified in Section 92.205 is as follows: Collier County does not use other forms of investment. 2. A description of the guidelines that will be used for resale or recapture of HOME funds when used for homebuyer activities as required in 92.254, is as follows: The County’s Recapture Provisions permit the original homebuyer to sell the property to any willing buyer, at any price the market will bear, during the period of affordability while the County is able to recapture all, or a portion of the HOME-assistance provided to the original homebuyer. Collier County utilizes a recapture policy in compliance of 24 CFR 92.254. The affordability period is determined based upon the amount of HOME Investment Partnerships Program funds invested into an individual project. HOME Regulations set three minimum tiers of affordability periods. When a homeowner chooses to sell or use the property for non-eligible HOME Program activities during the Period of Affordability, the full amount of the HOME Program Direct Subsidy shall be recaptured and repaid to Collier County provided that net proceeds are sufficient. If net proceeds are insufficient to repay the total HOME investment due, only the actual net proceeds will be recaptured. In the event that net proceeds are zero (as is usually the case with foreclosure), the recapture provision still applies. Recaptured funds shall be returned to the Collier County to reinvest in other affordable housing projects for low- to 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 408 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 183 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) moderate-income persons. The County’s Resale Provisions shall ensure that, when a HOME-assisted homebuyer sells or otherwise transfers his or her property, either voluntarily or involuntarily, during the affordability period: 1) The property is sold to another low-income homebuyer who will use the property as his or her principal residence. 2) The original homebuyer receives a fair return on investment, (i.e., the homebuyer’s down payment plus capital improvements made to the house); and 3) The property is sold at a price that is “affordable for a reasonable range of low-income buyers.” The County’s Recapture and Resale Provisions are included in full in the Appendix. 3. A description of the guidelines for resale or recapture that ensures the affordability of units acquired with HOME funds? See 24 CFR 92.254(a)(4) are as follows: Development Subsidy – a development subsidy is defined as financial assistance provided by the County to offset the difference between the total cost of producing a housing unit and the fair market value of the unit. When provided independently and absent any additional subsidy that could be classified a direct subsidy, development subsidy triggers resale. Direct Subsidy – a direct subsidy is defined as financial assistance provided by the County that reduces the purchase price for a homebuyer below market value or otherwise subsidizes the homebuyer [i.e., down-payment loan, purchase financing, assistance to CHDO to develop and sell unit below market or closing cost assistance]. A direct subsidy triggers recapture. Net Proceeds – the sales price minus superior loan repayment (other than HOME funds) and any closing costs. The County’s Recapture and Resale Provisions are included in full in the Appendix. 4. Plans for using HOME funds to refinance existing debt secured by multifamily housing that is rehabilitated with HOME funds along with a description of the refinancing guidelines required that will be used under 24 CFR 92.206(b), are as follows: Not applicable. Collier County has no plans to use HOME funds to refinance existing debt 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 409 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 184 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) secured by multifamily housing rehabilitated with HOME funds. Emergency Solutions Grants (ESG) Reference 91.220(l)(4) a) Include written standards for providing ESG assistance (may include as attachment) Collier County’s ESG Policy and Procedures Manual is attached as an appendix to this Plan. b) If the Continuum of Care has established centralized or coordinated assessment system that meets HUD requirements, describe that centralized or coordinated assessment system. Coordinated Entry is a streamlined system designed to efficiently match people experiencing homelessness or those at-risk of homelessness to available housing, shelter, and services. It prioritizes those who are most in need of assistance and provides crucial information that helps the Continuum of Care strategically allocate resources. Anyone seeking homelessness or homelessness prevention services in Collier County will complete a coordinated entry assessment which is subsequently evaluated for services. c) Identify the process for making sub-awards and describe how the ESG allocation available to private nonprofit organizations (including community and faith-based organizations). The County provides a competitive process for awarding all entitlement funding. This is widely advertised formally, via email, and at partnership meetings. A review and ranking committee reviews applications for merit and compliance. The CoC is provided an opportunity to support or not support an application. Eventually, the recommended awardees are noted in the Annual Action Plan. All public comment requirements are followed. The Annual Action Plan is presented to the Board of County Commissioners for approval, and then to HUD. The process is as follows: 1. Identification of community development issues, needs, and concerns through community meetings and citizen input. 2. Formulation of community development goals and preliminary strategies, i.e., staff and citizens. 3. Dissemination of Grant Funds information to agencies and individuals 4. Submission of Project applications; and 5. Project Selection: Review of project applications by review committee ii. Present recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners, Public Hearing and Final Selection sent to HUD d) If the jurisdiction is unable to meet the homeless participation requirement in 24 CFR 576.405(a), the jurisdiction must specify its plan for reaching out to and consulting with homeless or formerly homeless individuals in considering policies and funding decisions regarding facilities and services funded under ESG. Collier County meets the homeless participation requirement found in 24 CFR 576.405(a) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 410 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 185 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) through the Continuum of Care, which is led by the Collier County Hunger and Homeless Coalition. The CoC comments on funding applications and considers policies regarding homeless facilities and services. Other organizations representing the homeless provided input for the Consolidated Planning process, and a focus group was held at the Shelter for Abused Women and Children to gather input about housing and community development priorities. The County will continue to secure consultation with homeless or formerly homeless individuals, along with local organizations that represent and provide services to the homeless. e) Describe performance standards for evaluating ESG. Performance standards provide a measure for Collier County to evaluate the effectiveness of each ESG service provider in the areas of: (a) Targeting those who need assistance most; (b) Reducing the number of people living on the streets or in emergency shelters; (c) Reducing the time people spend homeless; and (d) Reducing clients’ housing barriers or housing stability risks. In addition, the County evaluates the success of ESG programs by reviewing Homeless Management Information System (HMIS) data . Sub recipients are required to submit regular reports which are reviewed by staff. These reports are used to ensure ESG compliance with regulations and local written standards as well as confirming that program goals are being met. ESG programs are also subjected to “on-site monitoring.” The County has a Monitoring Group to monitor the ESG programs. This group has participated in over 100 federal grant evaluation designs, evaluation projects, and implementation of evaluation plans. The basis for monitoring is to address findings and provides recommendations for program improvements Collier County will also evaluate each ESG service provider’s performance based on the following standards: a) Subrecipients will develop and adhere to priorities for service delivery by need. b) Subrecipients will assist clients in rapid movement to permanent housing from shelters or from the street. c) Subrecipients will ensure that clients have easy access to services. d) Subrecipients will provide comprehensive case management to address a spectrum of needs for each client. Appendix - Alternate/Local Data Sources 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 411 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 186 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) 1 Data Source Name 2010-2014 ACS List the name of the organization or individual who originated the data set. U.S. Census Bureau Provide a brief summary of the data set. The American Community Survey is an ongoing statistical survey that samples a small percentage of the U.S. population every year, thus providing communities with more current population and housing data throughout the 10 years between censuses. ACS data is compiled from an annual sample of approximately 3 million addresses rather than an actual count. What was the purpose for developing this data set? This dataset is more current than Census 2010 data and available for more geographic areas than the ACS 1-Year Estimates. How comprehensive is the coverage of this administrative data? Is data collection concentrated in one geographic area or among a certain population? National What time period (provide the year, and optionally month, or month and day) is covered by this data set? 2010-2014 ACS 5-year estimates are based on data collected from January 1, 2010 to December 21, 2014. What is the status of the data set (complete, in progress, or planned)? Complete 2 Data Source Name 2010 Census, 2015 & 2019 American Community Survey List the name of the organization or individual who originated the data set. U.S. Census Bureau 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 412 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 187 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Provide a brief summary of the data set. This dataset contains what is known as “100% data,” meaning that it contains the data collected from every household that participated in the 2010 Census and is not based on a representative sample of the population. What was the purpose for developing this data set? This data provides basic characteristics such as age, sex, and race for a variety of geographic levels with most data obtainable down to the census tract or block group level. How comprehensive is the coverage of this administrative data? Is data collection concentrated in one geographic area or among a certain population? National What time period (provide the year, and optionally month, or month and day) is covered by this data set? Data was collected in April 2000. What is the status of the data set (complete, in progress, or planned)? Complete 3 Data Source Name 2011-2015 CHAS List the name of the organization or individual who originated the data set. U.S. Census Bureau Provide a brief summary of the data set. To assess housing need, HUD receives a special tabulation of data from the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey that is largely not available through standard Census products. This data, known as the Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) data, counts the number of households that fit certain combinations of HUD- specified criteria, such as housing needs by income level, race, and ethnicity. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 413 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 188 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) What was the purpose for developing this data set? To assess housing need based on HUD-specified criteria such as income level, race, ethnicity, and household type. How comprehensive is the coverage of this administrative data? Is data collection concentrated in one geographic area or among a certain population? National What time period (provide the year, and optionally month, or month and day) is covered by this data set? The 2011-2015 CHAS data is based on American Community Survey data collected from January 1, 2011 to December 21, 2015. What is the status of the data set (complete, in progress, or planned)? Complete 4 Data Source Name 2013 Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics List the name of the organization or individual who originated the data set. U.S. Census Bureau Provide a brief summary of the data set. The Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (LEHD) data provides statistics on employment, earnings, and job flows by geography and industry for different demographic groups. What was the purpose for developing this data set? This dataset describes demographic characteristics and commute patterns of workers and jobs to help state and local authorities make informed economic decisions. How comprehensive is the coverage of this administrative data? Is data collection concentrated in one geographic area or among a certain population? National 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 414 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Consolidated Plan COLLIER COUNTY 189 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) What time period (provide the year, and optionally month, or month and day) is covered by this data set? 2013 What is the status of the data set (complete, in progress, or planned)? Complete 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 415 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict (PL20220001010) Exhibit V.E Public Facilities Level of Service Analysis June 23, 2023 Page 1 of 4 Exhibit VE Public Facilities-r1.docx Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134  239-947-1144  engineering@gradyminor.com  www.gradyminor.com Provide the existing Level of Service Standard (LOS) and document the impact the proposed change will have on the following public facilities: The subject 5.88± acre property proposes to create a new subdistrict to allow a maximum of 150 residential dwelling units. The public facilities analysis evaluates the project impacts on Class A public facilities including potable water, wastewater, drainage, parks, schools, roadways, fire/EMS and solid waste. The source for the LOS information is the Collier County 2021 AUIR, unless otherwise noted. Potable Water The property is located within the Collier County Water Sewer District’s regional potable water service area. Residential multi-family: 150 dwelling units x 2.5 pph x 130 gpcd = 48,750 gpd Peak: 48,750 gpd x 1.3 = 63,375 gpd Collier County LOS: 130 gpcd There are no existing or anticipated capacity issues; therefore, there are no LOS issues. Data Source: Collier County 2022 AUIR The proposed additional dwelling units will not create any LOS issues related to potable water. Sanitary Sewer The property is located within the Collier County Water Sewer District’s North County Water Reclamation Facility's service area. The LOS for wastewater is based on residential population generating 90 gpcd; therefore, the proposed project will not cause any LOS issues. Residential multi-family: 150 dwelling units x 2.5 pph x 90 gpcd = 33,750 gpd Peak: 33,750 gpd x 1.21 = 40,834.5 gpd There are no existing or anticipated capacity issues; therefore, there are no LOS issues. Data Source: Collier County 2022 AUIR The proposed additional dwelling units will not create any LOS issues related to sanitary sewer. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 416 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) June 23, 2023 Page 2 of 4 Exhibit VE Public Facilities-r1.docx Arterial and Collector Roads Please refer to the Traffic Impact Statement for discussion of the project’s impact on the LOS for arterial and collector roadways within the project’s radius of development influence. Drainage The County has adopted a LOS standard for private developments which requires development to occur consistent with water quantity and quality standards established in Ordinances 74-50, 90-10, 2001-2 and LDC Ordinance 2004-41, as may be amended. The property will be issued an Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), which has established requirements for water quality treatment, storm water runoff attenuation and controlled off-site discharge of storm water runoff. The proposed development is consistent with Collier County LOS standards. Solid Waste The proposed project is estimated to generate the following amounts of solid waste. LOS: 2 years of constructed lined cell capacity 555,384 Tons Available cell capacity 3,935,561 Tons Solid waste generation per year: Residential multi-family: 150 x 0.64 x 2.5 = 240 tons/year Total Solid Waste Generated Per Year = 240 tons The project is consistent with Collier County LOS standards and will nave no negative impact to the LOS standard. Data Source: Collier County 2022 AUIR Parks: Community and Regional The increased residential units will pay impact fees. No adverse impacts to Community or Regional Parks result from this new overlay as the project will pay impact fees. Schools The increased residential units will pay school impact fees. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 417 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) June 23, 2023 Page 3 of 4 Exhibit VE Public Facilities-r1.docx No adverse impacts to schools result from this new overlay as the project will pay impact fees. Fire Control, Sheriff and EMS The proposed project lies within the North Collier Fire and Rescue District. The North Collier Fire Control and Rescue District - Station #44, located at 8970 Hammock Oak Dr, and Station #46, 3410 Pine Ridge Road, which is approximately 3.8 miles and 2.6 miles from the property at Orange Blossom Drive and Airport Road. No significant impacts to Fire Control level of service are anticipated due to the proposed project. Estimated impact fees for EMS and fire would be determined at time of SDP based on the size or type of development. Sheriff, Fire Protection and EMS Services location/address of facilities intended to serve the project are; North Collier Fire Control and Rescue District - Station #44 8970 Hammock Oak Dr., Naples, FL 34108 North Collier Fire Control and Rescue District - Station #46 3410 Pine Ridge Road, Naples, FL 34105 Collier County Sheriff's Office - District 1 776 Vanderbilt Beach Rd, Naples, FL 34108 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 418 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) June 23, 2023 Page 4 of 4 Exhibit VE Public Facilities-r1.docx Existing Services and Public Facilities Map: 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 419 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 420 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 421 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 422 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 423 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 424 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.cPacket Pg. 425Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 426 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 427 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 428 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 429 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.cPacket Pg. 430 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 431 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.cPacket Pg. 432Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.cPacket Pg. 433 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 434 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 435 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 436 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 437 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 438 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 439 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 440 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 441 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.cPacket Pg. 442 9.A.1.cPacket Pg. 443Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.cPacket Pg. 444 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 445 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 446 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 447 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 448 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 449 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS($) _P_L2_02_2_00_01_0_1o_a_nd_P_L2_02_2_00_01_0_11 _________________ _ I, David J . Stevens (print name), as President (title, if applicable) of 333313375 vsR LLc (company, l~licable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner[ZJapplicantOcontract purchaserL_Jand that: *Notes: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. I have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. We/I authorize Q . Grady Minor & Associates , P.A. and Coleman , Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres. or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner" of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee". • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. erjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that ' 'oate STATE OF FLOR DA COUN OF CO LIER The foregoing instrument was acknowleged before me by means of ~ical presence or [Jon line notarization this ~ day of Ma,vc.h , 20~, by (printed name of owner or qualifier) David J. Stevens as President . Suc_,!YPerson(s) Notary Public must check applicable box: rsr'Are personally known to me □ Has produced a current drivers license ______ _ □ Has produced~-==.--------as identification . n ,ffi Notary Signature : ___;':::>=-'...;....:~:..i.::..t~~------------- CP\08-COA-00115\155 REV 3/4/2020 Notary Seal _.-:.:_-,:,,~ •i:,;_ .. _ STEP HANIE HOLLY LITTLE _ tf ~"F:\ Nou ry Pub lic • St at e of Flonda \~~Jtft Co mmis sion# HH 0 19619 \~')' OF f'-f .-' My Comm. Expi res Jul 9, 2024 • ...... ·So nded th ro u~h Nii tion il l Notuy •ssn . 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 450 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Addressing Checklist (Rev 9/2022)Page 1 of 1 Operations & Regulatory Management Division Ɣ1RUWK+RUVHVKRH'ULYHƔ1DSOHV)/Ɣ-- www.colliercountyfl.gov ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following and upload via the CityView Portal with your submittal. Items ŵĂƌŬĞĚǁŝƚŚ;ΎͿare required for every application, other items are optional and may not apply to every project. Forms are valid for 6 months following their submittal; an updated form will be required for a new submittal after that timeframe and any time the properties within the project boundary are modified. Additional documents may be attached to this form and can include: -ΎLOCATION MAP and/or SURVEY showing the proposed project boundary. - List of additional folio numbers and associated legal descriptions. - E-mail from Addressing Official for any pre-approved project and/or street names. LOCATION INFORMATION ΎFOLIO (Property ID) Number(s)of subject property or properties. [Attach list if necessary] ΎLEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties. [Attach list if necessary] STREET ADDRESS(ES)where applicable, if already assigned. PROJECT INFORMATION Acceptance of this form does not constitute project and/or street name approval and is subject to further review by the Addressing Official. Pre-Approval may be requested by contacting us at GMD_Addressing@colliercountyfl.gov or 239-252-2482 prior to your submittal. ΎPETITION TYPE (choose from the drop-down list below). A unique checklist must be created for each application. CURRENT PROJECT NAME PROPOSED PROJECT NAME PROPOSED STREET NAME(s) LATEST APPROVED PROJECT NUMBER [e.g., SDP-94-##, PPL-2002-AR-####, PL2017000####] 00200240000 and 00202280000 S31/T48/R26 3375 and 3333 Vanderbilt Beach Road GMPA (Growth Management Plan Amendment Adoption) N.A. 3375 and 3333 VBR Residential Subdistrict N.A. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 451 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Aerial Parcel No 00200240000 SiteAddress*Disclaimer 3375VANDERBILTBEACH RD Site City NAPLES Site Zone*Note 34109 Open GIS in a New Window with More Features. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 452 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Aerial Parcel No 00202280000 SiteAddress*Disclaimer 3333VANDERBILTBEACH RD Site City NAPLES Site Zone*Note 34109 Open GIS in a New Window with More Features. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 453 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 454 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 455 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 456 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 457 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 458 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 459 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 460 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 461 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 462 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 463 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.cPacket Pg. 464Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A.Ph. 239-947-1144  Fax. 239-947-0375 3800 Via Del Rey EB 0005151  LB 0005151  LC 26000266 Bonita Springs, FL 34134 www.gradyminor.com Project Location Map NOTICE OF NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING PETITIONS: PL20220001010 – Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict; and PL20220001011 – Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Planned Unit Development In compliance with the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) requirements, a neighborhood Information meeting (NIM) hosted by D. Wayne Arnold, AICP, of Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. (GradyMinor) and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq., of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A., representing 3333/3375 VBR LLC (Applicant) will be held May 24, 2023, 5:30 pm at the Collier County Headquarters Library, Sugden Theater (2385 Orange Blossom Dr., Naples, FL 34109). 3333/3375 VBR LLC has submitted formal applications to Collier County, seeking approval of a Small-Scale Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) establishing the Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict and a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) Rezone from the A, Agricultural Zoning District to Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD to allow a maximum of 150 residential dwelling units with a percentage required to be designated for affordable housing. The subject property is comprised of 5.88± acres and is located at 3375 and 3333 Vanderbilt Beach Road in Section 31, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. If you have questions, please contact Sharon Umpenhour with GradyMinor by email: sumpenhour@gradyminor.com or phone: 239-947-1144. For project information or to register to participate remotely* go to, gradyminor.com/Planning. Any information provided is subject to change until final approval by the governing authority. The NIM is an informational meeting, not a public hearing. *Remote participation is provided as a courtesy and is at the user’s risk. The applicant and GradyMinor are not responsible for technical issues. The Collier County Public Library does not sponsor or endorse this program. PROJECT INFORMATION GRADYMINOR.COM/PLANNING 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 465 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 1NAME1NAME2NAME3NAME4 NAME5NAME6LEGAL1LEGAL2LEGAL3LEGAL4FOLIO ADDRESSTYPE3333/3375 VBR LLC3838 TAMIAMI TR N STE #402NAPLES, FL 34103---3586 31 48 26 COMM AT SW CNR SEC 31 ,S89DEG E 991.18FT, N02DEG W 150.12FT TO POB, N02DEG W 517. 35FT, S89DEG E 330.09FT, S02 00200240000 U3333/3375 VBR LLC3838 TAMIAMI TRAIL N #402NAPLES, FL 34103---031 48 26 E1/2 OF W1/2 OF E1/2 OF S1/2 OF SW1/4 OF SW1/4, LESS S 150FT00202280000 UBRADFORD SQUARE RETIREMENT COMMUNITY LLC7101 S 82ND STLINCOLN, NE 68516---0 31 48 26 S1/2 OF SW1/4 OF SW 1/4 LESS S 150FT LESS E 495FT +-LESS R W DESC IN OR 3022 PG 1128& LESS RW DESC IN OR 3599 00203042108 UBURGO, SANDRA L1131 BROOKSHIRE DRNEW CASTLE, PA 16101---0 MARSALA AT TIBURON LOT 3459810000788 UDININO, JOHN M & SUSAN R14455 MARSALA WAYNAPLES, FL 34109---3233 MARSALA AT TIBURON LOT 4159810000924 UHAPPY MONEY TRUST14435 MARSALA WAYNAPLES, FL 34109---0MARSALA AT TIBURON LOT 3659810000827 UMARSALA AT TIBURON HOMEOWNERS ASSN INCC/O BUS MGMT SERV OF THE GULFCOAST PO BOX 10189 NAPLES, FL 34101---0MARSALA AT TIBURON TRACT A59810000021 UPAUL D MORTELL TRUSTJANE H MORTELL TRUST14451 MARSALA WAYNAPLES, FL 34109---0MARSALA AT TIBURON LOT 4059810000908 UPR NAPLES ACTIVE ADULT LLC C/O PGIM REAL ESTATE7 GIRALDA FARMSMADISON, NJ 07940---0 31 48 26 W1/2 OF S1/2 OFSE1/4 OF SW1/4, LESS S 150FT R/W00201000003 USANDWITH TR, JEFFREY SPERPETUAL ASSET SHIELD TRUST 205 BETSY LNRICHMOND, KY 40475---8555 MARSALA AT TIBURON LOT 3559810000801 USOUTH WAVERLEY FLORIDA LTD 14447 MARSALA WAYNAPLES, FL 34109---0MARSALA AT TIBURON LOT 3959810000885 UTGM BERMUDA ISLAND INC1 N LASALLE ST #2100CHICAGO, IL 60602---3918 06 49 26 COM NW CNR VILLAGE WALK PH ONE, S 7DEG 11'31"W 403.11FT, S 4'1"W 380FT,THENCE 408.41FT ALONG ARC OF CURVE 00282520007 UTIBURON GOLF VENTURES L P % RYAN LLCPO BOX 4900SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85261---0 31 48 26 SW1/4 OF NW1/4,NW1/4 OF SE1/4 OF NW1/4, N1/2 OF SW1/4 OF SW1/4, NW1/4 OF SW1/4, N1/2 OF 00199320002 UTIITF /ST OF FL3900 COMMONWEALTH BLVDTALLAHASSEE, FL 32399---3000 31 48 26 PAR 68 I-75 R/W00202520003 UTURNER, DAVID P & RACHELLE L 14439 MARSALA WAYNAPLES, FL 34109---0MARSALA AT TIBURON LOT 3759810000843 UVILLAGE WALK HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION OF NAPLES INC 3200 VILLAGE WALK CIR STE 100NAPLES, FL 34109---1316 VILLAGE WALK PHASE ONE TRACT A (R/W)80400000109 UVILLAGE WALK HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION OF NAPLES INC 3200 VILLAGE WALK CIR STE 100NAPLES, FL 34109---1316 VILLAGE WALK PHASE ONE TRACT B (LAKE/DE), LESS THAT PORTION DESC IN OR 2300 PG 254280400000358 UVILLAGE WALK HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION OF NAPLES INC 3200 VILLAGE WALK CIR STE 100NAPLES, FL 34109---1316 VILLAGE WALK PHASE ONE TRACT D (COMMON AREA)LESS OR 3526 PG 383680400000950 UWOZNIAK, GLENN G & MEI N14443 MARSALA WAYNAPLES, FL 34109---0MARSALA AT TIBURON LOT 3859810000869 UNotice: This data belongs to the Collier County Property Appraiser's Office (CCPA). Therefore, the recipient agrees not to represent this data to anyone as other than CCPA provided data. The recipient may not transfer this data to others without consent from the CCPA.Petition: PL20220001011 & PL20220001010 | Buffer: 500' | Date: 3/31/23 | Site Location: 00200240000 & OthersPOList_500.xls9.A.1.cPacket Pg. 466Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at 9.A.1.cPacket Pg. 467Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.cPacket Pg. 468Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 9.A.1.cPacket Pg. 469Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) Zoom Registration ‐ May 24, 2023 NIM PL20220001010 and PL20220001011 First Name Last Name Email Bobby Ruiz bruiz@tgmcommunities.com Robert Campbell rcampbell@tgmcommunities.com Mary Waller mew4naples@aol.com 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 470 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) PL20220001010 – MATTSON AT VANDERBILT RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT; AND PL20220001011 – MATTSON AT VANDERBILT RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT May 24, 2023, NIM Transcript Page 1 of 4 Sharon Umpenhour: 00:01 Okay, we're recording. Wayne Arnold: 00:01 All right. Wayne Arnold: 00:03 Well good evening everybody. I'm Wayne Arnold with GradyMinor & Associates and we're here tonight to talk about two applications that are pending with Collier County Government. We don't have any audience attendees other than staff and the development team, but we do have a couple of folks on Zoom. So I hope you all can hear us fine and can see the video. I'll make some project introductions, but we're here for a project that is located just east of the intersection of Livingston Road and on the north side of Vanderbilt Beach Road. It's about 5.8 acres and it's currently the home of a pet resort and a defunct equestrian facility. And we're proposing a conference of plan amendment and a PD rezoning application in order to develop up to 150 multifamily rental dwelling units on the property of which we have proposed 22.6% of those to be affordable units, income restricted. 01:04 So introduce the team. We have Andy Bollig who's here as a development partner with Roers Acquisitions. Rich Yovanovich is our land use counsel. I'm Wayne Arnold. Mike Delate, our civil engineer with GradyMinor & Associates. Jim Bank is our traffic engineer and we have a biologist who's not in attendance, but Marco Espinar did the environmental assessment for the site. 01:27 The project is highlighted here on the screen in yellow and you can see the existing structures. Those are all set to be raised assuming this project is approved. And again, the property's about 5.8 acres and located just east of Livingston Road. To our west is a project called Bradford Square, which is a age restricted senior housing project and to the east of us, is a project called Sandalwood Village, which also is an age restricted independent living facility. And to our north is the Tiburon Golf Club. 02:04 This is a project information sheet that lets you know that we are modifying the future land use map. We're creating a new subdistrict to establish the property to be allowed to have 150 multi-family rental units on that. And again, we're proposing that 22.6% of those would be income restricted homes. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 471 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) PL20220001010 – MATTSON AT VANDERBILT RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT; AND PL20220001011 – MATTSON AT VANDERBILT RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT May 24, 2023, NIM Transcript Page 2 of 4 Sharon Umpenhour: 02:27 Just a correction on that Future land use designation, the proposed, it's incorrect. Wayne Arnold: 02:33 Okay. We are proposing the new subdistrict and it'll be the Matson Vanderbilt Beach Road, subdistrict. We have to create a series of maps for the county as part of our small scale plan amendment. And this is a map that identifies the location for the mixed use subdistrict that will be for the subject property. Again, this is another series of maps with some of our sub- district language, and here it highlights, in paragraph C, the total units that are constructed, 22.6% of those would be income restricted, half of that number at the 80% or less and the others up to 100%. 03:18 Here's a conceptual master plan that we developed for the zoning application that identifies a central access point on Vanderbilt Beach Road, and then it's an 'H" shaped building with an interior courtyard amenity area with parking surrounding the building, some of which will probably have carport covered structures on it. This is a color version, just adds a little more clarity to where the green space, buffers, water management and the amenity areas will be located. 03:51 We propose to enhance the buffer adjacent to the Tiburon Golf Club with a series of clustered sable palm trees. Similar to what was prepared for the Sable, or excuse me, the Sandalwood Village project to our east. We have to propose development standards for the project highlighted here. Maximum building height. We establish a zone height of 50 feet and we're proposing an actual height that the maximum building height for any part of the structure would be 60 feet. 04:22 These are some images from other Roers projects. The building that's shown there is not a four-story building, but we're proposing in the 50-foot zone height to have a four-story apartment building. But you can see the quality of the finish that Roers intends to provide here with some of their outdoor amenity areas and just the architectural details. 04:45 So in the process we're required to hold a neighborhood informational meeting, which we're conducting tonight. Our next step will be to go to the Collier County Planning Commission, which we do not have a hearing date established yet. Separate mail notices will be provided to surrounding property owners once that date is established. And then after the planning commission, they will make a recommendation to 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 472 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) PL20220001010 – MATTSON AT VANDERBILT RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT; AND PL20220001011 – MATTSON AT VANDERBILT RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT May 24, 2023, NIM Transcript Page 3 of 4 the Board of County Commissioners. And that meeting has not yet been set, but those are our next steps and the County Commission will hold one final hearing and make a decision to approve, approve with conditions, or deny the application. 05:19 This is an informational sheet. Sharon Umpenhour, who's in charge of our audio system here tonight, is also our contact in our office for any of the information. So we upload on our website this presentation as well as other project information that is submitted to Collier County for the project and we continue to update it as we provide any updates to Collier County staff. So we will continue on through what's known as our Sufficiency Process until we get to our first planning commission hearing. And again, signs will be posted on the site when that hearing's established as well as mail notice is going out to surround the property members. 05:56 So that's our quick presentation. I'm happy to take any questions you may have from those attendees on Zoom. If you'd unmute if you have a question, that would be great. Robert Campbell: 06:11 The only question I have... Hello. My name's Robert Campbell. I'm with TGM Communities. We actually own TG and Bermuda Island directly across the Vanderbilt Road from the proposed site. I just had a question. Did you say that the document that you're sharing now will be uploaded onto the gradyminor.com planning website? Sharon Umpenhour: 06:35 It's already there. Wayne Arnold: 06:35 Yes, sir. It's there now. It'll be shared- Robert Campbell: 06:36 Oh, this version is already there, correct? Wayne Arnold: 06:37 It is. We uploaded that late this afternoon. Robert Campbell: 06:39 Okay. Much appreciated. It looks exciting. Wayne Arnold: 06:46 Thank you. Any other comments or questions? I know there's another attendee on the Zoom. Robert Campbell: 06:54 He's actually a colleague of mine. Wayne Arnold: 06:55 Oh, okay. Great. Sharon Umpenhour: 06:56 Mr. Ruiz, is that your colleague? 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 473 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) PL20220001010 – MATTSON AT VANDERBILT RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT; AND PL20220001011 – MATTSON AT VANDERBILT RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT May 24, 2023, NIM Transcript Page 4 of 4 Robert Campbell: 06:59 It is, correct. Wayne Arnold: 07:01 Okay. Sharon Umpenhour: 07:01 Oh, okay. Thank you. Wayne Arnold: 07:01 Great. Well, we're happy to answer any questions you may have as we go through the process or if you all think of anything else, we're glad to get information to you. We appreciate you. Robert Campbell: 07:10 No, I think everything looks great. I appreciate the presentation. Looking forward to seeing how it all plays out. Wayne Arnold: 07:17 Okay, well great. Thank you so much. Well, with that, I guess we'll adjourn. Thanks for participating and look forward to hearing from you. Thanks. Robert Campbell: 07:24 All right, have a great day. Robert Ruiz: 07:26 Thank you all. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 474 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) PETITIONS:PL20220001010 -MATTSON AT VANDERBILT RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT (GMPA); ANDPL20220001011 -MATTSON AT VANDERBILT RPUD May 24, 2023, Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) Project information and a copy of this presentation can be found on our website: GRADYMINOR.COM/PLANNING/ 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 475 PROJECT TEAM: •3333/3375 VBR, LLC – Applicant •Andy Bollig, Development Partner –Roers Acquisitions LLC •Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq., Land Use Attorney –Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. •D. Wayne Arnold, AICP, Professional Planner –Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. •Michael Delate, P.E., Civil Engineer –Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. •James M. Banks, PE, Traffic Engineer –JMB Transportation Engineering, Inc. •Marco A. Espinar, Environmental Planning/Biologist –Collier Environmental Consultants, Inc. *Please note, all information provided is subject to change until final approval by the governing authority. 2 INTRODUCTION 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 476 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA 3 LOCATION MAP 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 477 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA FUTURE LAND USE (FLU)DESIGNATION: Existing:Urban Designation,Mixed Use District,Urban Residential Subdistrict Proposed:Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict ZONING: Existing:A, Agricultural Proposed:Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD PROPOSED REQUEST: •Modify the FLU map to add The Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict •Rezone from the A, Agricultural,Zoning District to the Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential PUD •To allow a maximum of 150 multi-family rental units. PROJECT INFORMATION 4 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 478 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA 5 FUTURE LANDUSE MAP -EXISTING 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 479 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA 6 FUTURE LANDUSE MAP -PROPOSED Proposed Subdistrict Language: 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 480 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA 7 PROPOSED MASTER PLAN 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 481 8 CONCEPTUAL SITE RENDERING 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 482 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA 9 CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE RENDERING 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 483 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA 10 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 484 11 CONCEPTUAL RENDERINGS 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 485 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA NEXT STEPS •File resubmittal •Hearing Notices mailed to adjacent property owners within 500 feet of the subject property. •Hearing sign posted on property advertising hearing dates. •HEARING DATES: •CCPC –TBD, 9:00 a.m., Collier County Government Center, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, 3rd floor BCC Chamber, Naples, FL, 34112 •BCC –TBD, 9:00 a.m., Collier County Government Center, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, 3rd floor BCC Chamber, Naples, FL, 34112 12 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 486 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Project information and a copy of this presentation can be found online: WWW.GRADYMINOR.COM/PLANNING Collier County Growth Management Department (GMD) Public Portal: CVPORTAL.COLLIERCOUNTYFL.GOV/CITYVIEWWeb CONTACTS: •Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A.:Sharon Umpenhour, Senior Planning Technician; sumpenhour@gradyminor.com or 239.947.1144 •Collier County Staff:Timothy Finn; Timothy.Finn@colliercountyfl.gov, 239)252-4312 Katherine Eastley; Katherine.Eastley@colliercountyfl.gov, (239) 252-2834 PROJECT DOCUMENTS AND INFORMATION 13 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 487 Attachment: Attachments B - Backup Materials (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA SIGN POSTING INSTRUCTIONS (CHAPTER 8, COLLIER COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT) A zoning sign(s) must be posted by the petitioner or the petitioner’s agent on the parcel for a minimum of fifteen (15) calendar days in advance of the first public hearing and said sign(s) must be maintained by the petitioner or the petitioner’s agent through the Board of County Commissioners Hearing. Below are general guidelines for signs, however these guidelines should not be construed to supersede any requirement of the LDC. For specific sign requirements, please refer to the Administrative Code, Chapter 8 E. 1.The sign(s) must be erected in full view of the public, not more than five (5) feet from the nearest street right-of-way or easement. 2.The sign(s) must be securely affixed by nails, staples, or other means to a wood frame or to a wood panel and then fastened securely to a post, or other structure. The sign may not be affixed to a tree or other foliage. 3.The petitioner or the petitioner’s agent must maintain the sign(s) in place, and readable condition until the requested action has been heard and a final decision rendered. If the sign(s) is destroyed, lost, or rendered unreadable, the petitioner or the petitioner’s agent must replace the sign(s) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER BEFORE THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, PERSONALLY APPEARED SHARON UMPENHOUR WHO ON OATH SAYS THAT HE/SHE HAS POSTED PROPER NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 10.03.00 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE ON THE PARCEL COVERED IN PETITION NUMBER(S) PL20220001010 and PL20220001011. 3800 Via Del Rey SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT OR AGENT STREET OR P.O. BOX Sharon Umpenhour as Senior Planning Technician for Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. Bonita Springs, Florida 34110 NAME (TYPED OR PRINTED) CITY, STATE ZIP STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF LEE The foregoing instrument was sworn to and subscribed before me this 17 day of November , 2023, by Sharon Umpenhour as Senior Planning Technician for Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A., personally known to me or who produced as identification and who did/did not take an oath. Signature of Notary Public Carin J. Dwyer Printed Name of Notary Public My Commission Expires: (Stamp with serial number) Rev. 3/4/2015 NOTE: AFTER THE SIGN HAS BEEN POSTED, THIS AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE SHOULD BE RETURNED NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORKING DAYS BEFORE THE FIRST HEARING DATE TO THE ASSIGNED PLANNER. 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 488 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 489 Attachment: Affidavit of Sign Posting 2023-11-17 (27093 : PL20220001010 GMPA Amendment Mattson at Vanderbilt) 12/07/2023 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Planning Commission Item Number: 9.A.2 Doc ID: 27094 Item Summary: PL20220001011 – (PUDZ) Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD - An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, amending Ordinance number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from a Rural Agricultural (A) Zoning District to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) Zoning District for the project to be known as Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD, to allow construction of up to 150 multi-family rental units with affordable housing on property located on the north side of Vanderbilt Beach Road, approximately 828 feet from the intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Livingston Road, in Section 31, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, consisting of 5.88± acres; and by providing an effective date. [Coordinator: Timothy Finn, AICP, Planner III] (Companion item PL20220001010) Meeting Date: 12/07/2023 Prepared by: Title: – Zoning Name: Tim Finn 11/09/2023 1:45 PM Submitted by: Title: Zoning Director – Zoning Name: Mike Bosi 11/09/2023 1:45 PM Approved By: Review: Planning Commission Diane Lynch Review item Completed 11/14/2023 5:14 PM Operations & Regulatory Management Donna Guitard Review Item Completed 11/16/2023 3:11 PM Zoning Ray Bellows Review Item Completed 11/20/2023 5:13 PM Zoning James Sabo Review Item Completed 11/21/2023 11:43 AM Zoning Mike Bosi Review Item Completed 11/22/2023 10:32 AM Growth Management Community Development Department James C French GMD Deputy Dept Head Completed 11/27/2023 3:56 PM Planning Commission Ray Bellows Meeting Pending 12/07/2023 3:00 PM 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 490 PUDZ-PL20220001011 Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD Page 1 of 16 Revised: November 8, 2023 STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ZONING DIVISION – ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: DECEMBER 7, 2023 SUBJECT: PUDZ-PL20220001011; MATTSON AT VANDERBILT RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) COMPANION ITEM: PL20220001010; MATTSON AT VANDERBILT RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT (GMPA) ______________________________________________________________________________ PROPERTY OWNER/AGENTS: Owner/Applicant: Agents: 3333/3375 VBR LLC D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. 3838 Tamiami Trail North Q. Grady Minor & Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. Suite 402 Associates, P.A. 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 Naples, FL 34103 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, FL 34134 Naples, FL 34103 REQUESTED ACTION: The petitioner is requesting that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider an application to rezone the property from a Rural Agricultural (A) Zoning District to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) Zoning District for the project to be known as Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD, to allow construction of up to 150 multi-family rental units with affordable housing. The subject property is comprised of two parcels owned by 3333/3375 VBR LLC. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is located on the north side of Vanderbilt Beach Road, approximately 828 feet from the intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Livingston Road, in Section 31, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 5.88+/- acres (see location map on page 2). 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 491 Attachment: Staff Report - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) PUDZ-PL20220001011 Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD Page 2 of 16 Revised: November 8, 2023 PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This petition seeks to rezone the property to RPUD to allow for the development of up to 150 multi- family rental units with affordable housing at 25.5 (DU/AC) for a project to be known as Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD. 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 492 PUDZ-PL20220001011 Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD Page 3 of 16 Revised: November 8, 2023 SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: This section of the staff report identifies the land uses, zoning classifications, and maximum approved densities for properties surrounding the boundaries of Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD: North: Developed with a golf course with a driving range, with a current zoning designation of Pelican Marsh DRI/PUD (2.13 DU/AC), which is approved for single-family and multi-family residential units, golf course, clubhouse with recreational facilities, community facilities, and activity center East: Developed with senior living apartments called Sandalwood Village, with a current zoning designation of Vanderbilt Trust 1989 CFPUD, which is approved for independent and assisted living facilities, continuing care retirement facilities, and nursing homes South: Vanderbilt Beach Road, a six-lane arterial roadway, then developed with single-family units, with a current zoning designation of Vineyards PUD (2.9 DU/AC), which is approved for residential, commercial, recreation, open space, institutional, and civic uses. West: Developed with an independent living retirement community called Bradford Square Retirement Community, with a current zoning designation of Bradford Square MPUD, which is approved for commercial and residential Source: Grady Minor 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 493 Attachment: Staff Report - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) PUDZ-PL20220001011 Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD Page 4 of 16 Revised: November 8, 2023 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: Future Land Use Element (FLUE): The existing Future Land Use Element (FLUE), Future Land Use Map (FLUM) and Map Series of the Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP) designates the subject property as Urban, Mixed-Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict. The Urban Residential Subdistrict provides for higher-density residential uses, with the maximum density determined by the Density Rating System; however, in no case shall the maximum density exceed 16 dwelling units per acre in the Urban Residential Subdistrict. Staff calculation of the maximum allowable density, based upon the existing FLUE designation and applicable Density Rating System criteria, is 59 dwelling units, or 10 dwelling units per acre (DU/A) for market rate DUs. This is derived by adding the eligible base density of four (4) DU/A to the two (2) eligible density bonuses of Residential In-fill three (3) DU/A and TCMA - Transportation Concurrency Management Areas three (3) DU/A. If the project included affordable housing per LDC Section 2.06.00, then the project could be eligible for a density bonus of up to six (6) DU/A to achieve the maximum 16 DU/A allowed by the Density Rating System. The rezoning proposal is for 150 multi-family rental units on 5.88 acres, resulting in a density of 25.5 DU/A (15.5 dwelling units above the maximum density of 10 DU/A that can be achieved through the Density Rating System for market-rate development). The proposed density cannot be achieved through the Density Rating System and exceeds the maximum allowable density within the Urban Residential Subdistrict. Therefore, the proposal is inconsistent with the FLUE. To achieve the proposed density of 25.5 DU/A, a GMP Amendment (GMPA) is required. The GMPA petition, in addition to the increase in density, proposes a reduction in Open Space from that required by Section 4.07.02.G.1 of the LDC, which states, “Within PUD Districts composed entirely of residential dwelling units, at least 60 percent of the gross area shall be devoted to usable open space.” The GMPA Subdistrict language proposes reducing open space from 60 percent to 40 percent. Comprehensive Planning and Zoning Planning staff agree that a residential project's proposed open space reduction is appropriately requested through the zoning deviation process rather than through the proposed GMP text since the open space is an LDC regulation. Staff has several concerns with the proposed petition. The increase in density to 25.5 DU/A is not consistent with the surrounding residential densities, and the reduction in open space is not supported by staff. If the Planning Commission approves the GMPA and PUD petitions, staff recommends the provision of commensurate public benefit in the form of additional affordable housing units. The provision of 30 percent affordable units, rather than the 22.6 percent standard generally utilized in petitions, should be considered for the increase in density to 25.5 DU/A. The commensurate public benefit to offset the reduction in open space would increase the provision of affordable units to 34 percent. The increase to 30 percent affordable housing would result in 45 affordable units, 11 additional affordable housing units over the number of units achieved by the 22.6 percent provision. The public benefit of the 11 additional affordable units could support the increase in density. The increase to 34 percent affordable housing would result in 51 affordable units, six additional affordable housing units over the number of units achieved by the provision of 30 percent. This could support the reduction in useable open space that would benefit the residents of a dense urban rental project. Instead, a public benefit to the County, in the form of additional affordable housing units, may be acceptable. 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 494 Attachment: Staff Report - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) PUDZ-PL20220001011 Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD Page 5 of 16 Revised: November 8, 2023 Transportation Element: In evaluating this project, staff reviewed the August 8, 2023 (revised), Traffic Impact Statement for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) using the current 2022 Annual Update and Inventory Reports (AUIR). Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP states; “The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a.For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b.For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and c.For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project’s significant impacts on all roadways.” Staff finding: According to the TIS provided with this petition, the proposed development will generate a projected total of +/- 85 PM peak hour, 2-way trips on the adjacent roadway segments of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Livingston Road. The trips generated by this development will occur on the following roadway link: Link/Roadway Link Current Peak Hour Peak Direction Volume/Peak Direction Projected P.M. Peak Hour/Peak Direction Project Trips (1) 2021 AUIR LOS/ Remaining Capacity 2022 AUIR LOS/ Remaining Capacity 111.2/Vanderbilt Beach Road Livingston Rd to Logan Blvd 3,000/East 43/East D/ 474 (2) D/ 294 (2) 111.1/Vanderbilt Beach Road Livingston Rd to Airport Pulling Rd 3,000/East 18/East C/ 956 (2) D/ 156 (2) 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 495 Attachment: Staff Report - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) PUDZ-PL20220001011 Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD Page 6 of 16 Revised: November 8, 2023 110.2/Vanderbilt Beach Road Airport Pulling Rd to Goodlette Frank Rd 2,500/East 7/East C/ 849 C/ 579 52.0/Livingston Road Vanderbilt Beach Rd to Immokalee Rd 3,100/North 14/South C/ 1,328 C/ 1,078 53.0/Livingston Road Vanderbilt Beach Rd to Pine Ridge Rd 3,100/North 11/North B/ 1,610 B/ 1,570 54.0/Livingston Road Pine Ridge Rd to Golden Gate Pkwy 3,100/North 7/North B/ 1,714 B/ 1,684 67.2/Pine Ridge Road Livingston Rd to I-75 3,900/East 5/West C/ 1,166 C/ 1,014 42.1/Immokalee Road Livingston Rd to Airport Pulling Rd 3,100/East 2/East C/ 989 D/ 266 (2) 42.2/Immokalee Road Livingston Rd to I-75 3,500/East 7/West D/ 360 (2) D/ 310 (2) 1.0/Airport Pulling Road Vanderbilt Beach Rd to Immokalee Rd 2,200/North 2/South C/ 621 C/ 680 2.1/Airport Pulling Road Vanderbilt Beach Rd to Orange Blossom Rd 3,000/North 9/North C/ 857 D/ 707 •(1) Source for P.M. Peak Hour/Peak Direction Project Traffic is from the petitioner's August 8, 2023 Traffic Impact Statement. •(2) Expected deficient by trip bank; see State Statute 169.3180 below. Section 163.3180 of the Florida Statutes requires a local government to satisfy transportation concurrency requirements if the applicant enters into a binding agreement to pay or construct their proportionate share. The Statutes further state that any facility determined to be transportation deficient with existing, committed, and vested trips, plus additional projected background trips from any source other than the development project under review and trips that are forecast by established traffic standards, including traffic modeling, consistent with the University of Florida’s Bureau of Economic and Business Research medium population projections, without the project traffic under review, the costs of correcting that deficiency shall be removed from the project’s proportionate-share calculation and the necessary transportation improvements to correct that deficiency shall be considered to be in place for purposes of the proportionate-share calculation. The improvement necessary to correct the transportation deficiency is the funding responsibility of the entity that has maintenance responsibility for the 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 496 Attachment: Staff Report - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) PUDZ-PL20220001011 Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD Page 7 of 16 Revised: November 8, 2023 facility. The development’s proportionate share shall be calculated only for the needed transportation improvements that are greater than the identified deficiency. In addition, per the Statute, the applicant is eligible for a dollar-for-dollar credit for the road impact fees anticipated for the development. Based on the TIS, State Statues, the 2021, and the 2022 AUIR, the subject PUD can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan. The Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) indicates that the adjacent roadway network has sufficient capacity to accommodate this project within the 5-year planning period. Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental review staff has found this project to be consistent with the Conservation & Coastal Management Element (CCME). The project site has been cleared; no preservation is required. The project site is 5.88 acres and consists of 12 native trees meeting the preservation standards. GMP Conclusion: The proposed PUD is inconsistent with the GMP unless the Board approves the companion GMPA first or concurrently with the PUD and the uses and intensities align. STAFF ANALYSIS: Applications to rezone to or to amend RPUDs shall be in the form of a RPUD Master Plan of development, along with a list of permitted and accessory uses and a development standards table. The RPUD application shall also include a list of developer commitments and any proposed deviations from the LDC. Staff has completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition, including the criteria upon which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5, Planning Commission Recommendation (commonly referred to as the “PUD Findings”), and Section 10.02.08.F, Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission Report (referred to as “Rezone Findings”), which establish the legal basis to support the CCPC’s recommendation. The CCPC uses the aforementioned criteria as the basis for its recommendation to the Board, who in turn use the criteria to support their action on the rezoning or amendment request. An evaluation relative to these subsections is discussed below under the heading “Zoning Services Analysis.” In addition, staff offers the following analyses: Environmental Review: Environmental Services staff has reviewed the petition to address environmental concerns. The property has been developed and maintained clear of native vegetation required to be preserved. The Master Plan does not show a preserve since no minimum preservation is required. The site does contain 12 native trees that meet the preservation standards of LDC Section 3.05.07, which will require two (2) trees to be preserved (12 Existing Trees x 15%). No listed animal species were observed on the property; however, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) wildlife data indicate the presence of a Black Bear (Ursus americanus floridanus) in the area. A black bear management plan will need to be included in the PPL or SDP review. Transportation Review: The Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petition for compliance with the GMP and the LDC. Transportation Planning Staff recommends approval of the proposed Mattson at Vanderbilt PUDZ. 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 497 Attachment: Staff Report - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) PUDZ-PL20220001011 Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD Page 8 of 16 Revised: November 8, 2023 Utility Review: The project lies within the regional potable water service area and the North County Water Reclamation Facility’s wastewater service area of the Collier County Water-Sewer District (CCWSD). Water and wastewater services are available via existing infrastructure within the adjacent right-of-way. Sufficient water and wastewater treatment capacities are available. Any improvements to the CCWSD’s water or wastewater systems necessary to provide sufficient capacity to serve the project will be the responsibility of the owner/developer and will be conveyed to the CCWSD at no cost to the County at the time of utility acceptance. Landscape Review: The applicant is not seeking any deviations related to landscaping. The buffers labeled on the Master Plan meet or exceed the requirements of the LDC. Stormwater Review: Stormwater Management Section staff has reviewed the petition for compliance with the GMP and the LDC and recommends approval of this project. Zoning Services Review: This request is a rezone from a Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) Zoning District to allow construction of up to 150 multi-family dwelling units up to a maximum density of 25.5 dwelling units per acre (DU/A). Within the proposed Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD boundaries, the minimum PUD front yard setback is 50 feet, and the minimum PUD setback is 75 feet along the north, east, and west boundaries. The proposed heights have a zoned height of 50 feet and an actual building height of 60 feet. To the north is the Golf Course, Recreation, and Open Space (GCO) District, with a maximum height of 50 feet within the Pelican Marsh DRI/PUD. To the south is the Residential (R) District with a maximum height of 50 feet with the Vineyards PUD. To the west is the Bradford Square MPUD, with a zoned height of 43 feet and an actual height of 53 feet for group housing. To the east is the Vanderbilt Trust 1989 CFPUD, with a zoned height of 50 feet and a zoned height of 62 feet for principal structures. As such, the proposed heights within Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD are compatible with the immediate neighborhoods. As illustrated in the PUD Master Plan, a 15- foot-wide Type D Buffer is proposed along Vanderbilt Beach Road, a 10-foot Type A buffer is proposed along the eastern and western perimeters, and an enhanced 15-foot-wide Type B buffer is proposed along the northern perimeter. As such, the landscaping buffers will provide natural transitions around and within the RPUD. The development standards will provide adequate setbacks, limitations on height, and buffers to ensure compatibility with adjacent land uses. Companion item to this petition (GMPA-PL20220001010; Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict) will seek to allow for a maximum of 150 multi-family rental dwelling units, 40 percent usable open space, and affordable housing commitment of 22.6% of the dwelling units identified as affordable. Regarding the allowance of the 40 percent open space, it should be noted that per LDC 4.07.02.G.1, PUD Districts composed entirely of residential dwelling units and accessory uses, at least 60 percent of the gross area shall be devoted to open space. The agent has provided a rationale as to the reasoning behind the request for the 40% open space requirement in the Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict; see the italicized excerpt below. The Mattson at Vanderbilt project represents redevelopment and an infill residential project on 5.9+/- acres. The project proposes constructing 22.6% of the dwelling units as income-restricted 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 498 Attachment: Staff Report - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) PUDZ-PL20220001011 Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD Page 9 of 16 Revised: November 8, 2023 affordable housing, for which demand is well-documented. The applicant is proposing a project with comparable building heights to the adjacent independent rental apartments for seniors and has proposed locating the 4-story apartment building central to the site. Due to the size of the infill parcel, meeting the 60% usable open space standard would render the site unusable for buildings at the proposed 4-story height. A taller building, having less lot coverage, would be necessary to meet the 60% open space requirement. The proposed building height is in keeping with the two adjacent senior housing projects and other nearby development. The applicant has proposed an enhanced project buffer adjacent to the Tiburon Golf Course to ensure compatibility and increase the effective open space for the site. Staff cannot support this petition as submitted; if the Planning Commission recommends approval, then staff recommends that 30% affordable housing be required as a public benefit for the requested 25.5 (DU/AC) and a total of 34% affordable housing if a deviation is granted for the open space reduction. CONCURRENT PETITION AT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY On July 25, 2023, the agent submitted Mattson at Vanderbilt - (SDP) PL20230007212 for a proposed multi-family apartment complex consisting of 150 residential units in a 4-story building. The project will include an attached amenity area with a pool, pickleball court, outdoor rec areas, dog run, trash compactor and dumpster, water management areas, and utility infrastructure. PUD FINDINGS: LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5 states that, “In support of its recommendation, the CCPC shall make findings as to the PUD Master Plan’s compliance with the following criteria in addition to the findings in LDC Section 10.02.08”: 1.The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to the physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. Water and wastewater mains are available along Vanderbilt Beach Road. There are adequate water and wastewater treatment capacities to serve the project. Any improvements to the CCWSD’s water or wastewater systems necessary to provide sufficient capacity to serve the project will be the responsibility of the owner/developer and will be conveyed to the CCWSD at no cost to the County at the time of utility acceptance. Moreover, stormwater management details will be addressed at the time of SFWMD Environmental Resource Permitting (ERP) and County Site Development Permit (SDP)/Plans and Plat Permit (PPL) permitting. 2.Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contracts, or other instruments or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 499 Attachment: Staff Report - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) PUDZ-PL20220001011 Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD Page 10 of 16 Revised: November 8, 2023 at public expense. Documents submitted with the application, which the County Attorney’s Office reviewed, demonstrate unified property control. 3.Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). County staff has reviewed this petition and offered an analysis of conformity with the GMP's relevant goals, objectives, and policies within the GMP Consistency portion of this staff report. 4.The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. As described in the Staff Analysis section of this staff report subsection Landscape Review, staff is of the opinion that the proposed project will be compatible with the surrounding area. The buffers proposed in the Master Plan meet or exceed LDC requirements. 5.The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. The RPUD is required to provide at least 60% of the gross area for usable open space. No deviation from the open space requirement is requested; however, 40% open space is requested within the companion petition - Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict. Staff recommends removing the GMPA language regarding open space and requesting a deviation through the zoning petition. Staff does not support the reduction of open space in a dense urban apartment community. If the Planning Commission approves the reduction in open space, then Staff recommends that commensurate public benefit be required by provision of additional affordable housing. 6.The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of ensuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. The roadway infrastructure has sufficient to serve the proposed project, as noted in the Transportation Element consistency review. Operational impacts will be addressed at the first development order (SDP or Plat) when a new TIS will be required to demonstrate turning movements for all site access points. Finally, the project’s development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals, including but not limited to any plats and or site development plans, are sought. Water and wastewater mains are available along Vanderbilt Beach Road. There are adequate water and wastewater treatment capacities to serve the project. 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 500 Attachment: Staff Report - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) PUDZ-PL20220001011 Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD Page 11 of 16 Revised: November 8, 2023 Any improvements to the CCWSD’s water or wastewater systems necessary to provide sufficient capacity to serve the project will be the responsibility of the owner/developer and will be conveyed to the CCWSD at no cost to the County at the time of utility acceptance. 7.The ability of the subject property and surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. Water and wastewater mains are available along Vanderbilt Beach Road. There are adequate water and wastewater treatment capacities to serve the project. Any improvements to the CCWSD’s water or wastewater systems necessary to provide sufficient capacity to serve the project will be the responsibility of the owner/developer and will be conveyed to the CCWSD at no cost to the County at the time of utility acceptance. 8.Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on a determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to the literal application of such regulations. One deviation is proposed in connection with this request to rezone to RPUD. See the deviations section of the staff report beginning on page 14. Rezone Findings: LDC Subsection 10.02.08.F states, “When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations to the planning commission to the Board of County Commissioners…shall show that the planning commission has studied and considered a proposed change in relation to the following when applicable”: 1.Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Future Land Use Map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan. The proposed PUD is inconsistent with the GMP unless the Board approves the companion GMPA first or concurrently with the PUD and the uses and intensities align. 2.The existing land use pattern. This staff report's Surrounding Land Use and Zoning section describes the existing land use pattern (of the abutting properties). The proposed use is compatible; however, the requested density is not compatible. 3.The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. The properties that abut the project to the east, north, south, and west allow for residential uses. Therefore, the proposed petition would not create an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts; however, the requested density is not consistent with the nearby residential communities. 4.Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 501 Attachment: Staff Report - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) PUDZ-PL20220001011 Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD Page 12 of 16 Revised: November 8, 2023 As shown on the zoning map included at the beginning of this report, the existing district boundaries are logically drawn. The proposed PUD zoning boundaries follow the property ownership boundaries. The zoning map on page 2 of the staff report illustrates the perimeter of the outer boundary of the subject parcel. 5.Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed rezoning necessary. The proposed rezoning is not necessary, but it is being requested in compliance with the LDC provisions to seek such changes. It should be noted that the proposed uses are not allowed under the current zoning classification. 6.Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. The proposed RPUD is not consistent with the density in the neighborhood. 7.Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. The roadway infrastructure has adequate capacity to serve the proposed project at this time and as outlined above, i.e., GMP consistent at the time of rezoning as evaluated as part of the GMP Transportation Element consistency review. Operational impacts will be addressed at the time of the first development order (SDP or Plat). Additionally, the project’s development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought. The Project will also provide a 5-foot by 25-foot easement for a future Collier Area Transit (CAT) bus stop on Vanderbilt Beach Road in lieu of the required turn lane compensating ROW. 8.Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. The proposed RPUD request is not anticipated to create a stormwater management problem in the area, provided an environmental resource permit that adequately addresses stormwater best management practices, stormwater pollution prevention, urban stormwater management, on-site stormwater treatment, attenuation storage, flood plain compensation, and maintenance is obtained from the South Florida Water Management District. County staff will evaluate the project’s stormwater management system, calculations, and design criteria at the time of SDP and/or plat review. 9.Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. It is not anticipated this RPUD would reduce light or air to the adjacent areas. 10.Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent areas. 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 502 Attachment: Staff Report - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) PUDZ-PL20220001011 Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD Page 13 of 16 Revised: November 8, 2023 This is a subjective determination based upon anticipated results, which may be internal or external to the subject property. Property valuation is affected by a host of factors, including zoning; however, zoning by itself may or may not affect values since value determination is driven by market value. 11.Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. Properties to the east, north, south, and west are developed. The basic premise underlying all the development standards in the LDC is that sound application, when combined with the site development plan approval process and/or subdivision process, gives reasonable assurance that a change in zoning will not result in deterrence to improvement or development of adjacent property. Therefore, the proposed zoning change should not be a deterrent to the improvement of adjacent properties. 12.Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner, contrasting with the public welfare. The proposed development is inconsistent with the GMP, so the zoning petition cannot be supported. 13.Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. According to the existing classification, the proposed uses and development standards are not permitted. 14.Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the neighborhood's or the County's needs. The proposed project density is out of scale with the surrounding community; however, the additional density and reduction in open space may be supported if additional affordable housing is provided above the 22.6% proposed. 15.Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. The petition was reviewed for compliance with the GMP and the LDC, and staff does not specifically review other sites in conjunction with a specific petition. 16.The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of p otential uses under the proposed zoning classification. Any development anticipated by the PUD Document would require considerable site alteration, and this project will undergo extensive evaluation relative to all federal, state, 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 503 Attachment: Staff Report - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) PUDZ-PL20220001011 Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD Page 14 of 16 Revised: November 8, 2023 and local development regulations during the SDP and/or platting processes and again later as part of the building permit process. 17.The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services is consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, as amended. The development will have to meet all applicable criteria set forth in the LDC regarding Adequate Public Facilities. The project must also be consistent with all applicable goals and objectives of the GMP regarding adequate public facilities. This petition has been reviewed by county staff responsible for jurisdictional elements of the GMP as part of the rezoning process, and staff has concluded that the developer has provided appropriate commitments so that the impacts to the Level of Service (LOS) will be minimized. 18.Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in protecting public health, safety, and welfare. To be determined by the Board during its advertised public hearing. DEVIATION DISCUSSION: The petitioner is seeking one deviation from the requirements of the LDC. The deviation is directly extracted from PUD Exhibit E. The petitioner’s rationale and staff analysis/recommendation are outlined below. Proposed Deviation #1: (Parking Spaces) “Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.05.04, Table 17, Parking Space requirements for multifamily dwellings, which requires: All units shall have 1 parking space per unit plus visitor parking computed at 0.5 per efficiency unit, 0.75 per 1-bedroom unit, and 1 per 2-bedroom or larger unit. Office/administrative buildings shall have parking provided at 50 percent of normal requirements. Where small-scale recreation facilities are accessory to a single-family or multifamily project and intended only for the residents of that project, exclusive of golf courses/clubhouses, the recreation facilities may be computed at 50 percent of normal requirements where the majority of the dwelling units are not within 300 feet of the recreation facilities and at 25 percent of normal requirements where the majority of the dwelling units are within 300 feet of the recreation facilities. However, any recreation facility shall have a minimum of 2 spaces exclusive of parking spaces for dwelling units. Instead, allow parking to be provided at a ratio of 1.6 parking spaces per unit, with no requirement to provide additional parking for the recreation facilities. Petitioner’s Justification: The developer has extensive experience in creating successful multi- family dwelling units throughout the United States. Typically, they average 1.5 parking spaces per unit across their portfolio. Four (4) project examples have been submitted with similar site 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 504 Attachment: Staff Report - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) PUDZ-PL20220001011 Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD Page 15 of 16 Revised: November 8, 2023 characteristics as this site (location, density, size, etc.). Based on the proposed unit breakdown for this project, 40% of the units are proposed to be 1-bdrm. This is relatively high percentage of 1- bdrm units which only require 1.75 space per LDC 4.05.03. Further, the site has been designed in a manner that places all units in close proximity to the project amenity area. The master plan identifies the area where the amenities for the project will be located, and they will be located within a courtyard immediately adjacent to the building. No unit will be farther than 250’+/- from the project’s amenity area. At this distance, there is no need for any resident to walk to the parking lot and then drive a distance that may exceed the distance to walk to the pool or outdoor courts. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff does not support the PUDZ petition; however, if the Planning Commission recommends approval of this deviation, a finding that the requested deviation is in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has demonstrated that “the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety, and welfare of the community,” and LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h, the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is “justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations.” NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): The applicant conducted a NIM on May 24, 2023, at Collier County Headquarters Library, Sugden Theater Meeting Room, located at 2385 Orange Blossom Drive, Naples, FL. The meeting commenced at approximately 5:32 p.m. and ended at 5:39 p.m. Two public attendees were via Zoom. Wayne Arnold, the agent, conducted the meeting with introductions of the consultant team and staff and gave a PowerPoint. The presentation consisted of an overview of the proposed RPUD rezoning application. Following the agent’s presentation, the meeting was open to attendees to make comments and ask the consultant team questions regarding the proposed development. There was an inquiry as to where the PowerPoint is available. Wayne responded it’s on the Grady Minor website. One commitment was made within the PowerPoint presentation that illustrated an enhanced 15-foot wide type “B” landscape buffer. This enhanced buffer was added to the master plan in a subsequent submittal. A copy of the NIM Summary, sign-in sheet, and NIM PowerPoint presentation are included in Attachment C. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) REVIEW: This project does not require an Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews identified in Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney’s Office reviewed this staff report on October 30, 2023. 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 505 Attachment: Staff Report - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) PUDZ-PL20220001011 Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD Page 16 of 16 Revised: November 8, 2023 RECOMMENDATION: The companion GMPA is recommended for denial; therefore, Staff recommends denial of the PUDZ petition as submitted. Staff cannot support the requested density at this location; staff does not support including the usable open space standard in the GMP Subdistrict language and instead, a zoning deviation should be requested, and staff does not support the proposed deviation to reduce the usable open space from 60% to 40% in a dense urban rental apartment community. However, IF the Collier County Planning Commission chooses to recommend approval of this PUDZ petition, THEN, as an alternative, staff recommends the CCPC consider the following: •A reduction in the project density to 16 DU/A based on the subject location and inability to meet development standards and/or, •An increase in the public benefit in the form of additional affordable housing for the significant increase in density to a minimum of 30% based upon recent approvals and, •Staff acknowledges that maintaining the 60% usable open space requirement may necessitate a density reduction and/or a building height increase. Approving a reduction in usable open space could be offset by the petition providing increased public benefit in the form of additional affordable housing units at 34%. This would require the following changes in the PUD document: o Exhibit E, List of Deviations: ▪Regarding the GMPA, add a deviation to the PUD, reducing the open space from 60% to 40%. o Exhibit F, Affordable Housing: ▪Increase the affordable housing requirement from 22.6% to 34% Attachments: A)Proposed Ordinance B)FLUE Consistency Memo C)Application/Backup Materials 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 506 Attachment: Staff Report - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) [23-CPS-02327/1824670/1]73 Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD-PL20220001011 10/27/23 1 of 2 ORDINANCE NO. 2023 -_____ AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM A RURAL AGRICULTURAL (A) ZONING DISTRICT TO A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) ZONING DISTRICT FOR THE PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS MATTSON AT VANDERBILT RPUD, TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF UP TO 150 MULTI-FAMILY RENTAL UNITS WITH AFFORDABLE HOUSING ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 828 FEET FROM THE INTERSECTION OF VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD AND LIVINGSTON ROAD, IN SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, CONSISTING OF 5.88± ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PL20220001011] WHEREAS, D. Wayne Arnold, AICP, of Q. Grady Minor & Associates and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A., representing 3333/3375 VBR, LLC, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, to change the zoning classification of the herein described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: The zoning classification of the herein described real property located in Section 31, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from Rural Agricultural (A) Zoning District to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) for a 5.88± acre project to be known as Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD, to allow construction of a maximum of 150 multi- family dwelling units, in accordance with Exhibits A through F attached hereto and 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 507 Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Ordinance (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) [23-CPS-02327/1824670/1]73 Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD-PL20220001011 10/27/23 2 of 2 incorporated by reference herein. The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps, as described in Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, is/are hereby amended accordingly. SECTION TWO: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State and on the date that the Growth Management Plan Amendment in Ordinance No. _________ becomes effective. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super-majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this _______ day of ________________ 2023. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: _____________________________ By: ___________________________________ , Deputy Clerk Rick LoCastro, Chairman Approved as to form and legality: Heidi F. Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney Exhibit A: List of Permitted Uses Exhibit B: Development and Design Standards Exhibit C: Master Concept Plan Exhibit D: Legal Description Exhibit E: Deviations Exhibit F: Development Commitments 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 508 Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Ordinance (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD PL20220001011 September 6, 2023 Page 1 of 10 EXHIBIT A LIST OF PERMITTED USES Regulations for development of this PUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this document and all applicable sections of the Growth Management Plan (GMP), the Land Development Code (LDC), and the Administrative Code in effect at the time of approval of the Site Development Plan (SDP) or plat. Where the PUD ordinance does not provide development standards, then the provision of the specific sections of the LDC that are otherwise applicable shall apply. PERMITTED USES: A maximum of 150 multi-family rental dwelling units (at a density of 25.5+/- units per acre) shall be permitted within the PUD. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: RESIDENTIAL: A. Principal Uses: 1. Dwelling Units: Multi-family rental units Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) or the Hearing Examiner by the process outlined in the LDC. B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: 1. Carports and garages; and 2. Clubhouses, to serve residents and guests; and 3. Community administrative facilities and recreational facilities intended to serve residents and guests; and 4. Construction offices (during active construction only); and 5. Leasing offices; and 6. Open space uses and structures such as, but not limited to, boardwalks, nature trails, gazebos and picnic areas; and 7. Screen enclosures; and 8. Swimming pools and spas for residents and their guests; and 9. Water management facilities to serve the project such as lakes. 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 509 Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Ordinance (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD PL20220001011 September 6, 2023 Page 2 of 10 EXHIBIT B LIST OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The standards for land uses within the development shall be as stated in these development standard tables. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or subdivision plat. TABLE I PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES *2 MULTI-FAMILY Minimum Floor Area per unit 650 SF Minimum Lot Area N/A Minimum Lot Width N/A Minimum Lot Depth N/A Minimum Setbacks Front Yard 50 feet PUD Boundary (North, East & West) 75 feet Minimum Distance Between Buildings 20 feet Maximum Building Height Zoned Actual 50 feet 60 feet ACCESSORY STRUCTURES *2 Minimum Setbacks Front Yard 35 feet *4 PUD Boundary (East & West) *1 10 feet PUD Boundary (North) *1 15 feet Minimum Distance Between Buildings *3 10 feet Maximum Building Height Zoned Actual 25 feet 30 feet SPS – Same as Principal Structure *1 – Does not apply to passive recreational uses such as trails/pathways. *2 – Community structures such as guardhouses, gatehouses, fences, walls, columns, decorative architectural features, streetscape, passive parks and access control structures shall have no required internal setback, except as listed below, and are permitted throughout the PUD; however such structures shall be located such that they do not cause vehicular stacking into the road right-of-way or create site distance issues for motorists and pedestrians. *3 – Zero feet if attached. *4 – Lakes and open space and water management facilities may be reduced to 15 feet. 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 510 Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Ordinance (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD PL20220001011 September 6, 2023 Page 3 of 10 Maximum Height for Guardhouses/Gatehouses: Zoned: 25’ Actual: 30’ Note: nothing in this RPUD Document shall be deemed to approve a deviation from the LDC unless it is expressly stated in a list of deviations. 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 511 Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Ordinance (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD ZONED: THE VANDERBILT TRUST 1989 CFPUD USE: SENIOR LIVING APARTMENTS ZONED: BRADFORD SQUARE MPUD USE: RETIREMENT COMMUNITY ZONED: PELICAN MARSH DRI/PUD USE: GOLF COURSE / RESIDENTIAL ENHANCED 15' WIDE TYPE 'B' LANDSCAPE BUFFER (SEE SHEET 3) 15' WIDE TYPE 'D'10' WIDE TYPE 'A' LANDSCAPE BUFFER10' WIDE TYPE 'A' LANDSCAPE BUFFERPOTENTIAL VEHICULAR/PEDESTRIAN INTERCONNECTION LANDSCAPE BUFFER RESIDENTIAL BUILDING POOL FUTURE CAT BUS STOP SHELTER EASEMENT (APPROXIMATE LOCATION) GradyMinor Civil Engineers ●Land Surveyors ●Planners ●Landscape Architects Cert. of Auth. EB 0005151 Cert. of Auth. LB 0005151 Business LC 26000266 Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 Bonita Springs: 239.947.1144 ZZZ.GradyMinor.coP Fort Myers: 239.690.4380 0 100'50' SCALE: 1" = 100' WHEN PLOTTED @ 8.5" X 11" R RESIDENTIAL # DEVIATION 1 1 1 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 512 GradyMinorCivil Engineers●Land Surveyors●Planners●Landscape ArchitectsCert. of Auth. EB 0005151 Cert. of Auth. LB 0005151Business LC 26000266Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A.3800 Via Del ReyBonita Springs, Florida 34134 Bonita Springs: 239.947.1144ZZZ.GradyMinor.coP Fort Myers: 239.690.4380NOTES1. THIS PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND IS SUBJECT TO MINOR MODIFICATION DUE TOAGENCY PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS.DEVIATIONS (SEE EXHIBIT E)1. RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 4.05.04, TABLE 17, PARKING SPACE REQUIREMENTS FORMULTI-FAMILY DWELLINGSSITE SUMMARYTOTAL SITE AREA: 5.88± ACRESRESIDENTIAL:5.48± ACRES (93%)BUFFERS:0.40± ACRES (7%)RESIDENTIAL: MAXIMUM 150 MULTI-FAMILY RENTAL DWELLING UNITSOPEN SPACE:REQUIRED: 40% (PER MATTSON AT VANDERBILT RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT)PROVIDED: 40%PRESERVE:REQUIRED: 0± ACRES (0 ACRES NATIVE VEGETATION X 25%)PROVIDED: 0± ACRESTREE PRESERVATION:REQUIRED: 1.8 TREES (12 EXISTING TREES X 15%)PROVIDED: 2 TREES9.A.2.bPacket Pg. 513Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Ordinance (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD PL20220001011 September 6, 2023 Page 6 of 10 EXHIBIT D LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, LESS THE SOUTH 150.00 FEET FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN S. 89°56'12" E., ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 31, FOR A DISTANCE OF 991.18 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 31; THENCE RUN N 02°11'42" W., ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 31, FOR A DISTANCE OF 150.12 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD. A 150 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY AS SHOWN ON FDOT RIGHT-OF-WAY MAP SECTION 03512-2601, DATED 11-21-78, SAID POINT LYING 150.00 FEET NORTH OF, AS MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 31 AND ALSO BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL OF LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE CONTINUE N. 02°11'42" W., ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 31, FOR A DISTANCE OF 517.35 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 31; THENCE RUN S. 89°56'42' E., ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 31, FOR A DISTANCE OF 330.09 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 31. THENCE RUN S. 02°13'16" E. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 31, FOR A DISTANCE OF 517.41 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD; THENCE RUN N. 89°56'12" W. PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 31 AND ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 330.33 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. AND THE EAST 1/2 OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4, LESS THE SOUTH 150 FEET OF SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA CONTAINING 5.88 ACRES, MORE OR LESS 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 514 Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Ordinance (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD PL20220001011 September 6, 2023 Page 7 of 10 EXHIBIT E LIST OF DEVIATIONS Deviation #1: Relief from LDC Section 4.05.04, Table 17, Parking Space requirements for multi- family dwellings, which requires: All units shall have 1 parking space per unit plus visitor parking computed at 0.5 per efficiency unit, 0.75 per 1-bedroom unit, and 1 per 2-bedroom or larger unit. Office/administrative buildings shall have parking provided at 50 percent of normal requirements. Where small-scale recreation facilities are accessory to a single-family or multifamily project and intended only for the residents of that project, exclusive of golf courses/clubhouses, the recreation facilities may be computed at 50 percent of normal requirements where the majority of the dwelling units are not within 300 feet of the recreation facilities and at 25 percent of normal requirements where the majority of the dwelling units are within 300 feet of the recreation facilities. However, any recreation facility shall have a minimum of 2 spaces exclusive of parking spaces for dwelling units. To instead allow parking to be provided at a ratio of 1.6 parking spaces per unit, with no requirement to provide additional parking for the recreation facilities. 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 515 Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Ordinance (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD PL20220001011 September 6, 2023 Page 8 of 10 EXHIBIT F LIST OF DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS PURPOSE: The purposed of this Section is to set forth the development commitments for the development of this project. GENERAL: A. One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close- out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close- out of the PUD. At the time of this PUD approval, the Managing Entity is 3333/3375 VBR LLC, 3838 Tamiami Trail N, Suite 402, Naples, FL 34103. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD by the new owner and the new owner’s agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed-out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments. B. Issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law.” (Section 125.022, FS) C. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development. TRANSPORTATION: A. The maximum total daily trip generation shall not exceed 85 two-way PM peak hour net trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval. B. In lieu of providing compensatory right-of-way for the required turn lane, the owner at the time of SDP shall convey to County, at no cost to County and free and clear of all liens and encumbrances, a 5 foot by 25 foot easement adjacent to the turn lane for use as a future CAT bus stop shelter. The perimeter landscape buffer will be located outside of this easement. ENVIRONMENTAL: A. No native preservation area is required as there is no native vegetative community on the property. Twelve native trees exist on-site, and 15%, or 2 trees will be retained or replanted consistent with LDC Section 3.05.07.A.2. The retained or replanted trees will be shown on the Site Development 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 516 Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Ordinance (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD PL20220001011 September 6, 2023 Page 9 of 10 Plan. B. The required Type B buffer along the northern property boundary shall be enhanced to include additional tree plantings consisting of Sabal Palms planted at a staggered heights ranging from 14’ to 22’ at time of planting, planted in clusters of 3 trees 10’ on center, with clusters spaced no greater than 50’ on center and Areca Palms (or similar) ranging from 8’ to 10’ at time of planting, planted at 50’ on center. See Exhibit F1, Enhanced Buffer. AFFORDABLE HOUSING: A. Of the total units constructed, the project shall comply with the following: 11.3% of the units will be rented to households whose incomes are up to and including 80% of the Area Median Income (AMI) for Collier County and 11.3% of the units will be rented to households whose incomes are up to and including 100% of the AMI for Collier County and the corresponding rent limits. At time of each SDP, no less than 22.6% of the dwelling units will be identified as affordable and shown on the SDP with the required AMI ranges and fractional numbers will be rounded up to the nearest whole unit. These units will be committed for a period of 30 years from the date of issuance of certificate of occupancy of the first unit. Income and rent limits may be adjusted annually based on combined income and rent limit table published by the Florida Housing Finance Corporation or as otherwise provided by Collier County. B. As part of the annual PUD monitoring report, the developer will include an annual report that provides the progress and monitoring of occupancy of the income restricted units, including rent data for rented units, in a format approved by Collier County Community and Human Services Division. Developer agrees to annual on-site monitoring by the County. 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 517 Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Ordinance (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) GradyMinor Civil Engineers ●Land Surveyors ●Planners ●Landscape Architects Cert. of Auth. EB 0005151 Cert. of Auth. LB 0005151 Business LC 26000266 Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 Bonita Springs: 239.947.1144 ZZZ.GradyMinor.coP Fort Myers: 239.690.4380 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 518 Growth Management Community Development Department Zoning Division C O N S I S T E N C Y R E V I E W M E M O R A N D U M To: Timothy Finn, AICP, Planner III, Zoning Services Section From: Kathy Eastley, Planner III, Comprehensive Planning Section Date: November 7, 2023 Subject: Future Land Use Element Consistency Review PETITION NUMBER: PUDZ-PL20220001011 PETITION NAME: Mattson at Vanderbilt PUD Rezone REQUEST: Rezone the subject property (+5.88 acres) from Rural Agricultural (A) to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) to permit up to 150 multi-family rental dwelling units. LOCATION: The subject site is located on the north side of Vanderbilt Beach Road, approximately 825 feet east of Livingston Road, in Section 31, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMENTS: The existing Future Land Use Element (FLUE), Future Land Use Map (FLUM) and Map Series of the Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP) designates the subject property as Urban, Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict. The Urban Residential Subdistrict provides for higher density residential uses, with the maximum density determined by the Density Rating System; however, in no case shall the maximum density exceed 16 dwelling units per acre in the Urban Residential Subdistrict. Staff calculation of the maximum allowable density, based upon the existing FLUE designation and applicable Density Rating System criteria, is 59 dwelling units, or 10 dwelling units per acre (DU/A) for market rate DUs. This is derived by adding the eligible base density of 4 DU/A to the two eligible density bonuses of Residential In-fill (3 DU/A) and TCMA - Transportation Concurrency Management Areas (3 DU/A). If the project included affordable housing per LDC Section 2.06.00, then the project could be eligible for a density bonus of up to 6 DU/A to achieve the m aximum 16 DU/A allowed by the Density Rating System. The rezoning proposal is for 150 multi-family rental units on 5.88 acres, resulting in a density of 25.5 DU/A (15.5 dwelling units above the maximum density of 10 DU/A that can be achieved through the Density Rating System for market rate development). The proposed density cannot be achieved through the Density Rating System and exceeds the maximum allowable density within the Urban Residential Subdistrict. Therefore, the proposal is inconsistent with the FLUE. To achieve the proposed density of 25.5 DU/A a GMP Amendment (GMPA) is required. 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 519 Attachment: Attachment B - FLUE Consistency Memo (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) Mattson at Vanderbilt Consistency Review Memo 11/7/2023 2 The GMPA petition, in addition to the increase in density, proposes a reduction in Open Space from that required by Section 4.07.02.G.1 of the LDC which states “Within PUD Districts composed entirely of residential dwelling units, at least 60 percent of the gross area shall be devoted to usable open space.” The GMPA Subdistrict language proposes to reduce the open space from 60 percent to 40 percent. Comprehensive Planning staff and Zoning Planning staff agree that the proposed open space reduction for a residential project is appropriately requested through the zoning deviation process rather than through the proposed GMP text since the open space is an LDC regulation. Staff has several concerns with the proposed petition. The increase in density to 25.5 DU/A is not consistent with the surrounding residential densities, and the reduction in open space is not supported by staff. If the Planning Commission approves the GMPA and PUD petitions staff recommends the provision of commensurate public benefit in the form of additional affordable housing units. The provision of 30 percent affordable units, rather than the 22.6 percent standard generally utilized in petitions should be considered for the increase in density to 25.5 DU/A. The commensurate public benefit to offset the reduction in open space would increase the provision of affordable units to 34 percent. The increase to 30 percent affordable housing would result in 45 affordable units, 11 additional affordable housing units over the number of units achieved by the 22.6 percent provision. The public benefit of the 11 additional affordable units could support the increase in density. The increase to 34 percent affordable housing would result in 51 affordable units, 6 additional affordable housing units over the number of units achieved by the provision of 30 percent. This could support the reduction in useable open space that would benefit the residents of a dense urban rental project. Instead, a public benefit to the County, in the form of additional affordable housing units, may be acceptable. In reviewing for compliance with Policy 5.6 and Policies 7.1 - 7.4 (shown below) of the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) staff provides the following analysis in [bracketed bold text.] Policy 5.6: New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code (Ordinance 04-41, adopted June 22, 2004 and effective October 18, 2004, as amended). [Comprehensive Planning staff leaves this determination to Zoning staff as part of their review of the petition in its entirety. However, staff would note that in reviewing the appropriateness of the requested uses/intensities on the subject site, the compatibility analysis might include a review of both the subject proposal and surrounding or nearby properties as to allowed use intensities and densities, development standards (building heights, setbacks, landscape buffers, etc.), building mass, building location, traffic generation/attraction, etc.] Policy 7.1: The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. [The subject site will have one access point on Vanderbilt Beach Road, a major collector road as identified in the Transportation Element, as depicted on the RPUD Master Plan.] Policy 7.2: The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals. [One access point on Vanderbilt Beach Road is proposed. The project is served by an internal loop road.] 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 520 Attachment: Attachment B - FLUE Consistency Memo (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) Mattson at Vanderbilt Consistency Review Memo 11/7/2023 3 Policy 7.3: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and their interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. [The PUD Master Plan locates a “Potential Vehicular/Pedestrian Interconnection” at the east end of the project that could provide interconnection to the adjacent property. To the west is a developed project with buildings, water management area and preserve abutting the subject site; therefore, interconnection is not feasible. To the north is a golf course; there are no streets with which to connect. Sidewalks within the project will be required to connect with the on-street sidewalk and bicycle lane system along Vanderbilt Beach Road.] Policy 7.4: The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities, and a range of housing prices and types. [The proposed development will provide up to 150 multi-family rental units, with a percentage of those units proposed for affordable housing, thus providing a range of housing prices. The PUD Master Plan locates a “Potential Vehicular/Pedestrian Interconnection” at the east end of the project that could provide interconnection to the adjacent property, and project sidewalks will connect with the on-street sidewalk and bicycle lane system along Vanderbilt Beach Road . Open space and internal sidewalks must be provided as may be required by the LDC. Civic uses are not proposed; however, the clubhouses and other common building areas can potentially be used for civic purposes, e.g. neighborhood association meetings, NIMs, polling places, etc.] CONCLUSION: The rezoning petition is not consistent with the GMP. A companion Small Scale GMPA petition (PL20220001010) proposes to create a new Subdistrict within the Urban Mixed Use District of the FLUE to allow the proposed density of 25.5 DU/A and to reduce the Open Space. Staff is recommending denial of the petition due to inconsistent density with the surrounding residential communities, and reduction in open space. If the Planning Commission recommends approval of the petition, staff recommends that commensurate public benefit of 30 percent affordable housing be provided for the density of 25.5 DU/A; staff recommends that the reduction in open space be removed from the GMPA and more appropriately requested through the zoning deviation process in the PUD. If the Planning Commission recommends to approve the reduction in the open space requirement, staff recommends an increase in the provision of additional affordable housing, to 34 percent of the dwelling units constructed in the project for added public benefit to offset the open space reduction. Approval of this PUDZ petition is contingent upon the companion GMPA petition being approved and becoming effective. PETITION ON CITYVIEW 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 521 Attachment: Attachment B - FLUE Consistency Memo (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134  239-947-1144  engineering@gradyminor.com  www.gradyminor.com Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD PL20220001011 CCPC Hearing Backup Application and Supporting Documents 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 522 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. Ph. 239-947-1144  Fax. 239-947-0375 3800 Via Del Rey EB 0005151  LB 0005151  LC 26000266 Bonita Springs, FL 34134 www.gradyminor.com March 14, 2023 Amended April 27, 2023 Mr. Timothy Finn, AICP Collier County Growth Management Department Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 RE: Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD Rezone (PL20220001011), Submittal 1 Dear Mr. Finn: An application for Public Hearing for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) rezone for property located at 3375 and 3333 Vanderbilt Beach Road. The PUD rezone proposes to rezone the 5.88± acre property from the A Zoning District to the Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential PUD to allow a multi-family rental development with a maximum of 150 units. A companion Growth Management Plan amendment (Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict PL20220001010) has been filed to authorize the proposed multi-family dwelling units. Documents filed with submittal 1 include the following: 1. Cover Letter 2. Expedited Review Certification 3. Application for PUD Rezone 4. Evaluation Criteria 5. Pre-Application meeting notes 6. Affidavit of Authorization 7. Property Ownership Disclosure Form 8. Covenant of Unified Control 9. Addressing Checklist 10. Warranty Deed(s) 11. Boundary Survey 12. Environmental Data 13. Traffic Impact Study 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 523 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) Mr. Timothy Finn, AICP RE: Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD Rezone (PL20220001011), Submittal 1 March 14, 2023 (amended April 27, 2023) Page 2 of 2 14. School Concurrency 15. PUD Exhibits A-F 16. FLUE Amendment Language Please feel free to contact Rich Yovanovich at 435-3535 or me should you have any questions. Sincerely, D. Wayne Arnold, AICP c: 3333/3375 VBR, LLC Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. GradyMinor File (VBRRZ-22) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 524 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 525 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 526 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 527 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 528 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 529 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 530 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 531 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 532 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 533 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 534 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 535 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 536 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 537 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PL20220001011) Evaluation Criteria June 2, 2023 Evaluation Criteria-r1.docx Page 1 of 8 Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134  239-947-1144  engineering@gradyminor.com  www.gradyminor.com Pursuant to LDC subsections 10.02.13 B, 10.02.08 F and Chapter 3 G. of the Administrative Code, staff’s analysis and recommendation to the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission’s recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners shall be based upon consideration of the applicable criteria. Provide a narrative statement describing the rezone request with specific reference to the criteria below. Include any backup materials and documentation in support of the request. The applicant is proposing to rezone the 5.88+/- acre property from A, Agriculture to a Residential PUD to permit up to 150 multi-family rental dwelling units. The applicant has committed in the PUD that 22.6% of the constructed dwelling units will be income restricted. a. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. The site is well-suited for development and is currently developed with a veterinary clinic and pet resort, and an equine boarding/riding facility. The site has been altered in support of the existing facilities and has existing access directly onto 6-lane Vanderbilt Beach Road. Water and sewer services are available to the property. Drainage will be permitted through South Florida Water Management District. b. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the county attorney. The applicant is the contract purchaser of the RPUD. All other properties surrounding the site are developed. c. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. (This is to include identifying what Sub-district, policy or other provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that Sub-district, policy or other provision.) A companion small-scale growth management plan amendment has been filed which establishes a new subdistrict which is tailored to this specific property and establishes the proposed intensity of a maximum of 150 rental dwelling units and includes an income restriction for 22.6% of the units constructed. 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 538 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) June 2, 2023 Evaluation Criteria-r1.docx Page 2 of 8 Future Land Use Element Policy 5.4 requires that all applications must be consistent with the Growth Management Plan as determined by the Board of County Commissioners. A companion small-scale growth management plan amendment has been filed which creates a new subdistrict providing for development of the proposed 150 rental units. Upon approval of the Subdistrict, the project may be deemed consistent with the Growth Management Plan. Policies 5.5 and 5.7 discourage unacceptable levels of urban sprawl by utilizing urban areas for development before redesignating new property for urban intensity. The proposed development is located within the Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict. The site represents infill redevelopment and does not result in sprawl. Policy 5.6 requires that new projects will be compatible with and complementary to the surrounding land uses. The proposed project will consist of 4-story rental apartments. The property is located between two 3-story senior housing apartment facilities. The senior housing projects were approved to provide for 130 group housing units for seniors within Bradford Square PUD and 200 group housing units for seniors within the Vanderbilt Trust PUD. The proposed 150-unit rental apartments with up to 22.6% of the constructed units having income restrictions is of comparable use and density as the immediately adjacent property. To the north is the Tiburon Golf Course and to the south across the 6-lane arterial Vanderbilt Beach Road is TGM Bermuda Island apartment complex and the Village Walk residential community. Policy 5.8 encourages clustered development and the use of PUD techniques to conserve open space and environmentally sensitive areas. The site has been largely cleared of native vegetation and only scattered native trees exist on the site. The PUD contains a commitment regarding the preservation or replacement of 15% of the native trees. Objective 7, and implementing Policies 7.1-7.7, promote smart growth policies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and to adhere to the development character of the County. The proposed project cannot be interconnected to the adjoining senior housing community to the west due to the presence of water management facilities on that site. The Sandalwood Village senior housing facility to the east was constructed with a potential interconnect to this property; therefore, a potential interconnect to Sandalwood Village is shown on the PUD master plan. The site will provide a sidewalk connection to the existing sidewalk located within the Vanderbilt Beach Road ROW. Transportation Element Please see the Traffic Impact Analysis prepared which demonstrates compliance with the Level of Service Standards for arterial roadways. 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 539 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) June 2, 2023 Evaluation Criteria-r1.docx Page 3 of 8 Conservation and Coastal Management Element Policy 6.1.1 requires preservation of 15% of the existing native vegetation on sites ranging in size from 5 acres to 20 acres. The property has been largely cleared in support of the existing equine facility and pet hospital. No native vegetative communities exist on the property. Policy 6.2.5 is directed at reducing impacts to wetlands. There are no wetlands on the subject property. Objective 7.1: Direct incompatible land uses away from listed animal species and their habitats. The availability of suitable habitat for any vertebrate is quite limited. The parcel is cleared and does not provide potential for any denning, habitation and /or foraging. The parcel is also surrounded by development. The parcel was traversed and examined. Potential species for such a small parcel would be fox squirrels and/or gopher tortoises. At the time of inspection, no burrows and/or small animals were encountered. The project site does provide some foraging for traversing birds. A Black Bear management plan may be required at the time of SDP. Please also refer to the listed species management and indigenous preservation plans prepared by Collier Environmental Consultants, Inc. Housing Element Objectives 1 and 2 promote the creation of affordable housing units in the County that address the needs for various income levels. The proposed PUD requires that 22.6% of the rental units constructed with meet income levels between 80% and 100% of the Area Median Income and is consistent with the objectives of the Housing Element. d. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. The project as proposed is compatible both internally and externally. The proposed infill development of rental units is located between two rental communities targeted at seniors. The use is comparable, and it will be compatible with these neighboring uses given the proposed development standards and buffering provided within the PUD. e. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. The rental community will provide common open space which will consist of recreational amenity areas, buffers and water management areas. f. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 540 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) June 2, 2023 Evaluation Criteria-r1.docx Page 4 of 8 Adequate infrastructure must be in place to support future development on the site. There are no known infrastructure capacity issues that will impact this project. The residential project will be developed in a single phase. g. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. The RPUD is surrounded by zoned and developed land. Expansion of the PUD boundary is not proposed or feasible. h. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. The project as proposed is consistent with the LDC and meets all criteria for approval of a PUD. 10.02.08 - Requirements for Amendments to the Official Zoning Atlas F. Nature of requirements of Planning Commission report. When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations of the Planning Commission to the Board of County Commissioners required in LDC section 10.02.08 E shall show that the Planning Commission has studied and considered the proposed change in relation to the following findings, when applicable: 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan. Future Land Use Element Policy 5.4 requires that all applications must be consistent with the Growth Management Plan as determined by the Board of County Commissioners. A companion small-scale growth management plan amendment has been filed which creates a new subdistrict providing for development of the proposed 150 rental units. Upon approval of the Subdistrict, the project may be deemed consistent with the Growth Management Plan. Policies 5.5 and 5.7 discourage unacceptable levels of urban sprawl by utilizing urban areas for development before redesignating new property for urban intensity. The proposed development is located within the Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict. The site represents infill redevelopment and does not result in sprawl. Policy 5.6 requires that new projects will be compatible with and complementary to the surrounding land uses. The proposed project will consist of 4-story rental apartments. The property is located between two 3-story senior housing apartment facilities. The senior housing projects were approved to provide for 130 group housing units for seniors within Bradford Square PUD and 200 group housing units for seniors within the Vanderbilt Trust PUD. 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 541 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) June 2, 2023 Evaluation Criteria-r1.docx Page 5 of 8 The proposed 150-unit rental apartments with up to 22.6% of the constructed units having income restrictions is of comparable use and density as the immediately adjacent property. To the north is the Tiburon Golf Course and to the south across the 6-lane arterial Vanderbilt Beach Road is TGM Bermuda Island apartment complex and the Village Walk residential community. Policy 5.8 encourages clustered development and the use of PUD techniques to conserve open space and environmentally sensitive areas. The site has been largely cleared of native vegetation and only scattered native trees exist on the site. The PUD contains a commitment regarding the preservation or replacement of 15% of the native trees. Objective 7, and implementing Policies 7.1-7.7, promote smart growth policies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and to adhere to the development character of the County. The proposed project cannot be interconnected to the adjoining senior housing community to the west due to the presence of water management facilities on that site. The Sandalwood Village senior housing facility to the east was constructed with a potential interconnect to this property; therefore, a potential interconnect to Sandalwood Village is shown on the PUD master plan. The site will provide a sidewalk connection to the existing sidewalk located within the Vanderbilt Beach Road ROW. Transportation Element Please see the Traffic Impact Analysis prepared which demonstrates compliance with the Level of Service Standards for arterial roadways. Conservation and Coastal Management Element Policy 6.1.1 requires preservation of 15% of the existing native vegetation on sites ranging in size from 5 acres to 20 acres. The property has been largely cleared in support of the existing equine facility and pet hospital. No native vegetative communities exist on the property. Policy 6.2.5 is directed at reducing impacts to wetlands. There are no wetlands on the subject property. Objective 7.1: Direct incompatible land uses away from listed animal species and their habitats. The availability of suitable habitat for any vertebrate is quite limited. The parcel is cleared and does not provide potential for any denning, habitation and /or foraging. The parcel is also surrounded by development. The parcel was traversed and examined. Potential species for such a small parcel would be fox squirrels and/or gopher tortoises. At the time of inspection, no burrows and/or small animals were encountered. The project site does provide some foraging for traversing birds. A Black Bear management plan may be required at the time of SDP. Please also refer to the listed species management and indigenous preservation plans prepared by Collier Environmental Consultants, Inc. 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 542 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) June 2, 2023 Evaluation Criteria-r1.docx Page 6 of 8 Housing Element Objectives 1 and 2 promote the creation of affordable housing units in the County that address the needs for various income levels. The proposed PUD requires that 22.6% of the rental units constructed with meet income levels between 80% and 100% of the Area Median Income and is consistent with the objectives of the Housing Element. 2. The existing land use pattern. To the immediate east and west of the site are group housing for seniors rental communities. To the south across Vanderbilt Beach Road is an existing rental community and a for sale residential community. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. The PUD boundary is not proposed to be changed; therefore, no isolated district is created by this zoning action. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. The PUD boundary represents a logical boundary. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary. The existing uses are not consistent with the growth management plan in that the property is located in the Urban area of Collier County and the existing agricultural related uses are not consistent with the anticipated future residential development at this location. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. The proposed rezone will not adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. The proposed master plan and development standards will assure compatibility. The proposed use is similar in use and intensity to the projects located immediately adjacent to the property. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 543 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) June 2, 2023 Evaluation Criteria-r1.docx Page 7 of 8 The proposed 150-unit rental community will not create or excessively increase traffic congestion. The TIS prepared for the PUD rezoning application concludes that the project will not adversely impact the surrounding road network or cause any roadways to operate below their adopted level of service. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. The project will obtain a SFWMD permit for the surface water management system and will have no impact on surrounding development. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. The proposed rezone will have no impact on light and air to adjacent areas. 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent area. The proposed rezone should have no impact on property values in the adjacent area. The project will consist of both market rate and income restricted units which will be undiscernible. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. The proposed rezone should enhance surrounding properties and will not deter improvement or development of nearby properties. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. Any property owner may propose zoning changes subject to the requirements of the LDC. No special privilege results from the PUD Amendment. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. The proposed PUD provides for an increase in the number of dwelling units above that authorized by the current zoning. The current zoning is A, Agriculture and does not permit the proposed multi-family dwelling units. The rezoning is necessary to support the proposed use. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county. The scale of the project is in scale with the needs of the community. 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 544 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) June 2, 2023 Evaluation Criteria-r1.docx Page 8 of 8 15. Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. It is not impossible to find other sites in the County; however, this infill property has development surrounding it and it is served by a 6-lane arterial roadway and has water and wastewater services available to it. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. The property has been previously cleared and filled in support of the existing land uses. Minimal additional site clearing will be required to support the proposed apartment use. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code ch. 106, art. II], as amended. There are adequate roadways and utilities available at the site. There are no public facilities deficiencies at the present time, and none will occur as a result of this project. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. The project is consistent with the proposed Growth Management Plan amendment, and it is compatible with surrounding development. 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 545 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 546 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 547 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 548 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 549 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 550 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 551 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 552 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 553 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 554 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 555 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 556 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 557 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 558 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 559 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 560 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 561 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 562 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 563 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS($) _P_L2_02_2_00_01_0_1o_a_nd_P_L2_02_2_00_01_0_11 _________________ _ I, David J . Stevens (print name), as President (title, if applicable) of 333313375 vsR LLc (company, l~licable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner[ZJapplicantOcontract purchaserL_Jand that: *Notes: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. I have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. We/I authorize Q . Grady Minor & Associates , P.A. and Coleman , Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres. or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner" of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee". • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. erjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that ' 'oate STATE OF FLOR DA COUN OF CO LIER The foregoing instrument was acknowleged before me by means of ~ical presence or [Jon line notarization this ~ day of Ma,vc.h , 20~, by (printed name of owner or qualifier) David J. Stevens as President . Suc_,!YPerson(s) Notary Public must check applicable box: rsr'Are personally known to me □ Has produced a current drivers license ______ _ □ Has produced~-==.--------as identification . n ,ffi Notary Signature : ___;':::>=-'...;....:~:..i.::..t~~------------- CP\08-COA-00115\155 REV 3/4/2020 Notary Seal _.-:.:_-,:,,~ •i:,;_ .. _ STEP HANIE HOLLY LITTLE _ tf ~"F:\ Nou ry Pub lic • St at e of Flonda \~~Jtft Co mmis sion# HH 0 19619 \~')' OF f'-f .-' My Comm. Expi res Jul 9, 2024 • ...... ·So nded th ro u~h Nii tion il l Notuy •ssn . 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 564 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1036 | Email: GMDClientServices@colliercountyfl.gov www.colliercountyfl.gov 01/2023 Page 1 of 3 This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: Name and Address % of Ownership N.A. b. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address % of Ownership 3333/3375 VBR LLC, 3838 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 402, Naples FL 34103 David J. Stevens (Chairman, Director, President, Treasurer) - Ownership Interest Clinton L. Sherwood (Director, Vice President, Secretary) - Ownership Interest 100 c. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest: Name and Address % of Ownership N.A. PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 565 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1036 | Email: GMDClientServices@colliercountyfl.gov www.colliercountyfl.gov 01/2023 Page 2 of 3 d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners: Name and Address % of Ownership N.A. e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners: Name and Address % of Ownership Roers Acquisitions LLC, Two Carlson Parkway, Suite 400, Plymouth, MN 55447 Brian Roers – 50% owner Kent Roers – 50% owner 100 Date of Contract: February 3, 2023 f. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust: Name and Address N.A. g. Date subject property acquired 2022 Leased: Term of lease years /months 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 566 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1036 | Email: GMDClientServices@colliercountyfl.gov www.colliercountyfl.gov 01/2023 Page 3 of 3 If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Date of option: December 31, 2023 Date option terminates: N.A. , or Anticipated closing date: N.A. Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form. Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest-holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition’s final public hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. *The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Community Development Department | GMD Portal: https://cvportal.colliercountyfl.gov/cityviewweb Questions? Email: GMDclientservices@colliercountyfl.gov February 14, 2023 Agent/Owner Signature Date D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Agent/Owner Name (please print) AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 567 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 568 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) Addressing Checklist (Rev 9/2022)Page 1 of 1 Operations & Regulatory Management Division Ɣ1RUWK+RUVHVKRH'ULYHƔ1DSOHV)/Ɣ-- www.colliercountyfl.gov ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following and upload via the CityView Portal with your submittal. Items ŵĂƌŬĞĚǁŝƚŚ;ΎͿare required for every application, other items are optional and may not apply to every project. Forms are valid for 6 months following their submittal; an updated form will be required for a new submittal after that timeframe and any time the properties within the project boundary are modified. Additional documents may be attached to this form and can include: -ΎLOCATION MAP and/or SURVEY showing the proposed project boundary. - List of additional folio numbers and associated legal descriptions. - E-mail from Addressing Official for any pre-approved project and/or street names. LOCATION INFORMATION ΎFOLIO (Property ID) Number(s)of subject property or properties. [Attach list if necessary] ΎLEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties. [Attach list if necessary] STREET ADDRESS(ES)where applicable, if already assigned. PROJECT INFORMATION Acceptance of this form does not constitute project and/or street name approval and is subject to further review by the Addressing Official. Pre-Approval may be requested by contacting us at GMD_Addressing@colliercountyfl.gov or 239-252-2482 prior to your submittal. ΎPETITION TYPE (choose from the drop-down list below). A unique checklist must be created for each application. CURRENT PROJECT NAME PROPOSED PROJECT NAME PROPOSED STREET NAME(s) LATEST APPROVED PROJECT NUMBER [e.g., SDP-94-##, PPL-2002-AR-####, PL2017000####] 00200240000 and 00202280000 S31/T48/R26 3375 and 3333 Vanderbilt Beach Road PUDZ (Planned Unit Development Rezone) N.A. 3375 VBR RPUD N.A. 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 569 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Aerial Parcel No 00200240000 SiteAddress*Disclaimer 3375VANDERBILTBEACH RD Site City NAPLES Site Zone*Note 34109 Open GIS in a New Window with More Features. 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 570 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Aerial Parcel No 00202280000 SiteAddress*Disclaimer 3333VANDERBILTBEACH RD Site City NAPLES Site Zone*Note 34109 Open GIS in a New Window with More Features. 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 571 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 572 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 573 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 574 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 575 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 576 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.dPacket Pg. 577Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) Livingston RDVillage Walk CIR Vanderbilt Beach RD M a r sal a W A Y Wilshire Lakes BLVDCerrito CT Benicia CT Andorra CT Donoso CT Montalvo CTLos Altos CTGroves RD Bermuda Isle CIREl Verdado CT Deepwater CTSandpiper WAYSource: Esri, Maxar, Earthstar Geographics, and the GIS User Community Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD Location Map . 750 0 750375 Feet Legend PUD BOUNDARY Document Path: G:\Planning\PROJ - PLANNING\VBRRZ-22 Mattson at Vanderbilt\Drawings\GIS\GeneralLocationMap-r1.mxd9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 578 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 579 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 580 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 581 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 582 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 583 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 584 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 585 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 586 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 587 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 588 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 589 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 590 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 591 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 592 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 593 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 594 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 595 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 596 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 597 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 598 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 599 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 600 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 601 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 602 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 603 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 604 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 605 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 606 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 607 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 608 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 609 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 610 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 611 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 612 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 613 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 614 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 615 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 616 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 617 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 618 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 619 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 620 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 621 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 622 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 623 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 624 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 625 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 626 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 627 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 628 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 629 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 630 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 631 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 632 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 633 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 634 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 635 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 636 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 637 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 638 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 639 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 640 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 641 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 642 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 643 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 644 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 645 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 646 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 647 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 648 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 649 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 650 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 651 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 652 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 653 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) Collier County School District School Impact Analysis Application Instructions: Submit one copy of completed application and location map for each new residential project requiring a determination of school impact to the Planning Department of the applicable local government. This application will not be deemed complete until all applicable submittal requirements have been submitted. Please be advised that additional documentation/information may be requested during the review process. For information regarding this application process, please contact the Facilities Management Department at 239-377-0267. Please check [¥] type of application request (one only): [ ] School Capacity Review [ ] Exemption Letter [ ] Concurrency Determination [ ] Concurrency Determination Amendment For descriptions of the types of review please see page 3, _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ I. Project Information: Project Name:___________________________________________ Municipality:_________________________________ Parcel ID#: (attach separate sheet for multiple parcels): _______________________________________________________ Location/Address of subject property: ____________________________________________________ (Attach location map) Closest Major Intersection: _______________________________________________________________________________ II. Ownership/Agent Information: Owner/Contract Purchaser Name(s): _____________________________________________________________________ Agent/Contact Person: ________________________________________________________________________________ (Please note that if agent or contact information is completed the District will forward all information to that person) Mailing address: _____________________________________________________________________________________ Telephone#: _____________________________ Fax: _________________________Email_________________________ I hereby certify the statements and/or information contained in this application with any attachments submitted herewith are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. _____________________________________________________ _____________________________ Owner or Authorized Agent Signature Date _________________________________________________________________________________________ III.Development Information Project Data (Unit Types defined on page 2 of application) Current Land Use Designation:Proposed Land Use Designation: Current Zoning:Proposed Zoning: Project Acreage: Unit Type:SF MF MH C G Total Units Currently Allowed by Type: Total Units Proposed by Type: Is this a phased project: Yes or No If yes, please complete page 2 of this application. Date/time stamp:___________________________ orrect to the best of my y y yyyyyy yyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy yyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy knowledge. __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ gent Signature No 3375 and 3333 VBR RPUD Collier County 00200240000 and 00202280000 3375 and 3333 Vanderbilt Beach Road Vanderbilt Beach Road and Livingston Road Investment Properties Corporation of Naples D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A., 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134 239.947.1144 warnold@gradyminor.com October 5, 2022 Urban Residential Subdistrict A Residential Planned Unit Development 5.88+/- 0 150 ✔ 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 654 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) Worksheet is required to be completed by the Applicant only if the project is to be phased:Unit Type Yr1 Yr2 Yr3 Yr4 Yr5 Yr6 Yr7 Yr8 Yr9 Yr10 Yr 11-20 20+ YearsSFMFMHCGTotals by YrGrand TotalGrand TotalInsert totals by unit type by years.Unit Types:SF = Single FamilyMF = Multi-Family/Apartments MH = Mobile HomesC = Condo/Co-OpG = GovernmentEXAMPLE:Unit Type Yr1 Yr2 Yr3 Yr4 Yr5 Yr6 Yr7 Yr8 Yr9 Yr10 Yr 11-20 20+ YearsSF25 25 25 25 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --MF50 0 0 0 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --MHN/ACN/AGN/ATotals by Yr75 25 25 25 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Grand Total 150.29.A.2.dPacket Pg. 655Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt Types of Reviews: School Impact Analysis: This review should be divided into two categories: -School Capacity Review (land use and rezonings), and; -Concurrency Determinations (site plans and subdivisions). School Capacity Review is the review of a project in the land use and rezoning stage of development. It is a review of the impact of the development on school capacity and is considered long range planning. This may be a review resulting in mitigation being required. In situations where the applicant may be required to mitigate, capacity may be reserved dependent on the type of mitigation. Concurrency Determination is the review of residential site plans and subdivisions to determine whether there is available capacity. When capacity is determined to be available a School Capacity Determination Letter (SCADL) will be issued verifying available capacity to the applicant and the local government. If a project exceeds the adopted level of service standards, the applicant is afforded the option of a negotiation period that may or may not result in an executed/recorded mitigation agreement Mitigation at this stage is expressed as a Proportionate Share Mitigation Agreement. For those residential developments that may have an impact but are otherwise exempt from concurrency, an exemption letter will be prepared for the applicant upon request. For those residential developments that are determined to not have an impact, a letter of no impact will be prepared for the applicant upon request. Exemption Letter: An applicant may request an Exemption Letter as documentation for the local government. These are projects that would be exempt from school concurrency review or projects that do not impact the public schools. Exemptions from school concurrency are limited to existing single family or mobile home lots of record; amendments to previously approved site plans or plats that do not increase the number of dwelling units or change the dwelling unit type; age restricted communities with no permanent residents under the age of 18; or residential site plans or plats or amendments to site plans or plats that generate less than one student; or are authorized as a Development of Regional Impact (Chapter 380, F.S.) as of July 1, 2005. Concurrency Determination Amendment: An applicant may request an amendment to a previously issued School Concurrency Determination or to an application being processed. This review may require additional staff time beyond the initial concurrency determination review and results in a modified determination being issued. An amendment could result in a negotiation period and/or a mitigation agreement being issued or a previously approved determination being modified and reissued. 3 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 656 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Aerial Parcel No 00200240000 SiteAddress*Disclaimer 3375VANDERBILTBEACH RD Site City NAPLES Site Zone*Note 34109 Open GIS in a New Window with More Features. 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 657 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Aerial Parcel No 00202280000 SiteAddress*Disclaimer 3333VANDERBILTBEACH RD Site City NAPLES Site Zone*Note 34109 Open GIS in a New Window with More Features. 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 658 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict (PL20220001010) EXHIBIT IV.B Future Land Use Element Amendment Language July 17, 2023 Page 1 of 3 Exhibit IVB Proposed Language-r2.docx Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134  239-947-1144  engineering@gradyminor.com  www.gradyminor.com Proposed amendment to the Collier County Future Land Use Element (FLUE) and Future Land Use Map (FLUM) to establish the 5.88± Acre Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict. Words underlined are additions; words struck through are deletions. SECTION I: Amend Future Land Use Map Series, beginning on page v as follows: * FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES 140 *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** *** * Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict SECTION II: Amend “II. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY”, Policy 1.5 beginning on page 9 as follows: *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 1.5: The URBAN Future Land Use Designation shall include Future Land Use Districts and Subdistricts for: A. URBAN - MIXED USE DISTRICT 1. Urban Residential Subdistrict 2. Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict 3. Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict 4. Business Park Subdistrict 5. Office and Infill Commercial Subdistrict 6. PUD Neighborhood Village Center Subdistrict 7. Residential Mixed Use Neighborhood Subdistrict 8. Orange Blossom Mixed-Use Subdistrict 9. Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict 10. Henderson Creek Mixed-Use Subdistrict 11. Research and Technology Park Subdistrict 12. Buckley Mixed-Use Subdistrict 13. Commercial Mixed Use Subdistrict 14. Livingston/Radio Road Commercial Infill Subdistrict 15. Vanderbilt Beach Road Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict 16. Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict 17. Hibiscus Residential Infill Subdistrict 18. Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict 19. Mini Triangle Mixed Use Subdistrict 20. Goodlette/Pine Ridge Mixed Use Subdistrict 21. Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard East Residential Subdistrict 22. Meridian Village Mixed-Use Subdistrict 23. Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed Use Subdistrict Map 24. Immokalee Road Interchange Residential Infill Subdistrict 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 659 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) July 17, 2023 Page 2 of 3 Exhibit IVB Proposed Language-r2.docx 25. Creekside Commerce Park East Mixed Use Subdistrict 26. Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict SECTION III: Amend “I. URBAN DESIGNATION”, beginning on page 26 as follows: *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** *** A. Urban Mixed Use District *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** *** 26. Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict [beginning Page 55] The 5.88-acre subdistrict, as depicted on the Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict map, is located approximately 1,100 feet east of Livingston Road on the north side of Vanderbilt Beach Road. The intent of this subdistrict is to allow for a maximum of 150 multi-family dwelling units to promote affordable and workforce housing in an urban area with transit, employment centers, and public infrastructure. The development of this subdistrict will be governed by the following criteria: a. Development shall be in the form of a PUD. b. The dwelling units are limited to rental units. c. The maximum number of dwelling units permitted within the subdistrict is 150 dwelling units. d. Usable open space shall be 40% of the overall site area. e. Affordable Housing Commitment: 1. Of the total units constructed the project shall comply with the following: 11.3% of the units will be rented to households whose incomes are up to and including 80% of the Area Median Income (AMI) for Collier County and 11.3% of the units will be rented to households whose incomes are up to and including 100% of the AMI for Collier County and the corresponding rent limits. At time of each SDP, no less than 22.6% of the dwelling units will be identified as affordable and shown on the SDP with the AMI ranges and fractional numbers will be rounded up to the nearest whole unit. These units will be committed for a period of 30 years from the date of issuance of certificate of occupancy of the first unit. Income and rent limits may be adjusted annually based on combined income and rent limit table published by the Florida Housing Finance Corporation or as otherwise provided by Collier County. 2. As part of the annual PUD monitoring report, the developer will include an annual report that provides the progress and monitoring of occupancy of the income restricted units, including rent data for rented units, in a format approved by Collier County Community and Human Services Division. Developer agrees to annual on-site monitoring by the County. 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 660 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) July 17, 2023 Page 3 of 3 Exhibit IVB Proposed Language-r2.docx f. The Density Rating System is not applicable to this Subdistrict. SECTION IV: Amend “FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES”, beginning page 159 as follows: *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** *** Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict [page 160] 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 661 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PL20220001011) Deviation Justification June 8, 2023 Page 1 of 1 Deviation Justification-r1.docx Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134  239-947-1144  engineering@gradyminor.com  www.gradyminor.com 1. Deviation #1 requests relief from LDC Section 4.05.04, Table 17, Parking Space requirements for multi-family dwellings, which requires: All units shall have 1 per unit plus visitor parking computed at 0.5 per efficiency unit, 0.75 per 1-bedroom unit, and 1 per 2-bedroom or larger unit. Office/administrative buildings shall have parking provided at 50 percent of normal requirements. Where small-scale recreation facilities are accessory to a single-family or multifamily project and intended only for the residents of that project, exclusive of golf courses/clubhouses, the recreation facilities may be computed at 50 percent of normal requirements where the majority of the dwelling units are not within 300 feet of the recreation facilities and at 25 percent of normal requirements where the majority of the dwelling units are within 300 feet of the recreation facilities. To instead allow parking to be provided at a ratio of 1.6 parking spaces per unit, with no requirement to provide additional parking for the recreation facilities. Justification: The developer has extensive experience in creating successful multi-family dwelling units throughout the United States. Typically, they average 1.5 parking spaces per unit across their portfolio. Four (4) project examples have been submitted with similar site characteristics as this site (location, density, size, etc.). Based on the proposed unit breakdown for this project, 40% of the units are proposed to be 1-bdrm. This is relatively high percentage of 1-bdrm units which only require 1.75 space per LDC 4.05.03. Further, the site has been designed in a manner that places all units in close proximity to the project amenity area. The master plan identifies the area where the amenities for the project will be located, and they will be located within a courtyard immediately adjacent to the building. No unit will be farther than 250’+/- from the project’s amenity area. At this distance there is no need for any resident to walk to the parking lot and then drive a distance that may exceed the distance to walk to the pool or outdoor courts. 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 662 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) November 8, 2022 Page 4 of 4 Exhibit VE Public Facilities.docx Existing Services and Public Facilities Map: 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 663 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.dPacket Pg. 664Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. Ph. 239-947-1144  Fax. 239-947-0375 3800 Via Del Rey EB 0005151  LB 0005151  LC 26000266 Bonita Springs, FL 34134 www.gradyminor.com Project Location Map NOTICE OF NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING PETITIONS: PL20220001010 – Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict; and PL20220001011 – Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Planned Unit Development In compliance with the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) requirements, a neighborhood Information meeting (NIM) hosted by D. Wayne Arnold, AICP, of Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. (GradyMinor) and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq., of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A., representing 3333/3375 VBR LLC (Applicant) will be held May 24, 2023, 5:30 pm at the Collier County Headquarters Library, Sugden Theater (2385 Orange Blossom Dr., Naples, FL 34109). 3333/3375 VBR LLC has submitted formal applications to Collier County, seeking approval of a Small-Scale Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) establishing the Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict and a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) Rezone from the A, Agricultural Zoning District to Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD to allow a maximum of 150 residential dwelling units with a percentage required to be designated for affordable housing. The subject property is comprised of 5.88± acres and is located at 3375 and 3333 Vanderbilt Beach Road in Section 31, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. If you have questions, please contact Sharon Umpenhour with GradyMinor by email: sumpenhour@gradyminor.com or phone: 239-947-1144. For project information or to register to participate remotely* go to, gradyminor.com/Planning. Any information provided is subject to change until final approval by the governing authority. The NIM is an informational meeting, not a public hearing. *Remote participation is provided as a courtesy and is at the user’s risk. The applicant and GradyMinor are not responsible for technical issues. The Collier County Public Library does not sponsor or endorse this program. PROJECT INFORMATION GRADYMINOR.COM/PLANNING 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 665 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 1NAME1NAME2NAME3NAME4 NAME5NAME6LEGAL1LEGAL2LEGAL3LEGAL4FOLIO ADDRESSTYPE3333/3375 VBR LLC3838 TAMIAMI TR N STE #402NAPLES, FL 34103---3586 31 48 26 COMM AT SW CNR SEC 31 ,S89DEG E 991.18FT, N02DEG W 150.12FT TO POB, N02DEG W 517. 35FT, S89DEG E 330.09FT, S02 00200240000 U3333/3375 VBR LLC3838 TAMIAMI TRAIL N #402NAPLES, FL 34103---031 48 26 E1/2 OF W1/2 OF E1/2 OF S1/2 OF SW1/4 OF SW1/4, LESS S 150FT00202280000 UBRADFORD SQUARE RETIREMENT COMMUNITY LLC7101 S 82ND STLINCOLN, NE 68516---0 31 48 26 S1/2 OF SW1/4 OF SW 1/4 LESS S 150FT LESS E 495FT +-LESS R W DESC IN OR 3022 PG 1128& LESS RW DESC IN OR 3599 00203042108 UBURGO, SANDRA L1131 BROOKSHIRE DRNEW CASTLE, PA 16101---0 MARSALA AT TIBURON LOT 3459810000788 UDININO, JOHN M & SUSAN R14455 MARSALA WAYNAPLES, FL 34109---3233 MARSALA AT TIBURON LOT 4159810000924 UHAPPY MONEY TRUST14435 MARSALA WAYNAPLES, FL 34109---0MARSALA AT TIBURON LOT 3659810000827 UMARSALA AT TIBURON HOMEOWNERS ASSN INCC/O BUS MGMT SERV OF THE GULFCOAST PO BOX 10189 NAPLES, FL 34101---0MARSALA AT TIBURON TRACT A59810000021 UPAUL D MORTELL TRUSTJANE H MORTELL TRUST14451 MARSALA WAYNAPLES, FL 34109---0MARSALA AT TIBURON LOT 4059810000908 UPR NAPLES ACTIVE ADULT LLC C/O PGIM REAL ESTATE7 GIRALDA FARMSMADISON, NJ 07940---0 31 48 26 W1/2 OF S1/2 OFSE1/4 OF SW1/4, LESS S 150FT R/W00201000003 USANDWITH TR, JEFFREY SPERPETUAL ASSET SHIELD TRUST 205 BETSY LNRICHMOND, KY 40475---8555 MARSALA AT TIBURON LOT 3559810000801 USOUTH WAVERLEY FLORIDA LTD 14447 MARSALA WAYNAPLES, FL 34109---0MARSALA AT TIBURON LOT 3959810000885 UTGM BERMUDA ISLAND INC1 N LASALLE ST #2100CHICAGO, IL 60602---3918 06 49 26 COM NW CNR VILLAGE WALK PH ONE, S 7DEG 11'31"W 403.11FT, S 4'1"W 380FT,THENCE 408.41FT ALONG ARC OF CURVE 00282520007 UTIBURON GOLF VENTURES L P % RYAN LLCPO BOX 4900SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85261---0 31 48 26 SW1/4 OF NW1/4,NW1/4 OF SE1/4 OF NW1/4, N1/2 OF SW1/4 OF SW1/4, NW1/4 OF SW1/4, N1/2 OF 00199320002 UTIITF /ST OF FL3900 COMMONWEALTH BLVDTALLAHASSEE, FL 32399---3000 31 48 26 PAR 68 I-75 R/W00202520003 UTURNER, DAVID P & RACHELLE L 14439 MARSALA WAYNAPLES, FL 34109---0MARSALA AT TIBURON LOT 3759810000843 UVILLAGE WALK HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION OF NAPLES INC 3200 VILLAGE WALK CIR STE 100NAPLES, FL 34109---1316 VILLAGE WALK PHASE ONE TRACT A (R/W)80400000109 UVILLAGE WALK HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION OF NAPLES INC 3200 VILLAGE WALK CIR STE 100NAPLES, FL 34109---1316 VILLAGE WALK PHASE ONE TRACT B (LAKE/DE), LESS THAT PORTION DESC IN OR 2300 PG 254280400000358 UVILLAGE WALK HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION OF NAPLES INC 3200 VILLAGE WALK CIR STE 100NAPLES, FL 34109---1316 VILLAGE WALK PHASE ONE TRACT D (COMMON AREA)LESS OR 3526 PG 383680400000950 UWOZNIAK, GLENN G & MEI N14443 MARSALA WAYNAPLES, FL 34109---0MARSALA AT TIBURON LOT 3859810000869 UNotice: This data belongs to the Collier County Property Appraiser's Office (CCPA). Therefore, the recipient agrees not to represent this data to anyone as other than CCPA provided data. The recipient may not transfer this data to others without consent from the CCPA.Petition: PL20220001011 & PL20220001010 | Buffer: 500' | Date: 3/31/23 | Site Location: 00200240000 & OthersPOList_500.xls9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 666 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.dPacket Pg. 667Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.dPacket Pg. 668Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.dPacket Pg. 669Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) Zoom Registration ‐ May 24, 2023 NIM PL20220001010 and PL20220001011 First Name Last Name Email Bobby Ruiz bruiz@tgmcommunities.com Robert Campbell rcampbell@tgmcommunities.com Mary Waller mew4naples@aol.com 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 670 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) PL20220001010 – MATTSON AT VANDERBILT RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT; AND PL20220001011 – MATTSON AT VANDERBILT RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT May 24, 2023, NIM Transcript Page 1 of 4 Sharon Umpenhour: 00:01 Okay, we're recording. Wayne Arnold: 00:01 All right. Wayne Arnold: 00:03 Well good evening everybody. I'm Wayne Arnold with GradyMinor & Associates and we're here tonight to talk about two applications that are pending with Collier County Government. We don't have any audience attendees other than staff and the development team, but we do have a couple of folks on Zoom. So I hope you all can hear us fine and can see the video. I'll make some project introductions, but we're here for a project that is located just east of the intersection of Livingston Road and on the north side of Vanderbilt Beach Road. It's about 5.8 acres and it's currently the home of a pet resort and a defunct equestrian facility. And we're proposing a conference of plan amendment and a PD rezoning application in order to develop up to 150 multifamily rental dwelling units on the property of which we have proposed 22.6% of those to be affordable units, income restricted. 01:04 So introduce the team. We have Andy Bollig who's here as a development partner with Roers Acquisitions. Rich Yovanovich is our land use counsel. I'm Wayne Arnold. Mike Delate, our civil engineer with GradyMinor & Associates. Jim Bank is our traffic engineer and we have a biologist who's not in attendance, but Marco Espinar did the environmental assessment for the site. 01:27 The project is highlighted here on the screen in yellow and you can see the existing structures. Those are all set to be raised assuming this project is approved. And again, the property's about 5.8 acres and located just east of Livingston Road. To our west is a project called Bradford Square, which is a age restricted senior housing project and to the east of us, is a project called Sandalwood Village, which also is an age restricted independent living facility. And to our north is the Tiburon Golf Club. 02:04 This is a project information sheet that lets you know that we are modifying the future land use map. We're creating a new subdistrict to establish the property to be allowed to have 150 multi-family rental units on that. And again, we're proposing that 22.6% of those would be income restricted homes. 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 671 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) PL20220001010 – MATTSON AT VANDERBILT RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT; AND PL20220001011 – MATTSON AT VANDERBILT RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT May 24, 2023, NIM Transcript Page 2 of 4 Sharon Umpenhour: 02:27 Just a correction on that Future land use designation, the proposed, it's incorrect. Wayne Arnold: 02:33 Okay. We are proposing the new subdistrict and it'll be the Matson Vanderbilt Beach Road, subdistrict. We have to create a series of maps for the county as part of our small scale plan amendment. And this is a map that identifies the location for the mixed use subdistrict that will be for the subject property. Again, this is another series of maps with some of our sub- district language, and here it highlights, in paragraph C, the total units that are constructed, 22.6% of those would be income restricted, half of that number at the 80% or less and the others up to 100%. 03:18 Here's a conceptual master plan that we developed for the zoning application that identifies a central access point on Vanderbilt Beach Road, and then it's an 'H" shaped building with an interior courtyard amenity area with parking surrounding the building, some of which will probably have carport covered structures on it. This is a color version, just adds a little more clarity to where the green space, buffers, water management and the amenity areas will be located. 03:51 We propose to enhance the buffer adjacent to the Tiburon Golf Club with a series of clustered sable palm trees. Similar to what was prepared for the Sable, or excuse me, the Sandalwood Village project to our east. We have to propose development standards for the project highlighted here. Maximum building height. We establish a zone height of 50 feet and we're proposing an actual height that the maximum building height for any part of the structure would be 60 feet. 04:22 These are some images from other Roers projects. The building that's shown there is not a four-story building, but we're proposing in the 50-foot zone height to have a four-story apartment building. But you can see the quality of the finish that Roers intends to provide here with some of their outdoor amenity areas and just the architectural details. 04:45 So in the process we're required to hold a neighborhood informational meeting, which we're conducting tonight. Our next step will be to go to the Collier County Planning Commission, which we do not have a hearing date established yet. Separate mail notices will be provided to surrounding property owners once that date is established. And then after the planning commission, they will make a recommendation to 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 672 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) PL20220001010 – MATTSON AT VANDERBILT RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT; AND PL20220001011 – MATTSON AT VANDERBILT RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT May 24, 2023, NIM Transcript Page 3 of 4 the Board of County Commissioners. And that meeting has not yet been set, but those are our next steps and the County Commission will hold one final hearing and make a decision to approve, approve with conditions, or deny the application. 05:19 This is an informational sheet. Sharon Umpenhour, who's in charge of our audio system here tonight, is also our contact in our office for any of the information. So we upload on our website this presentation as well as other project information that is submitted to Collier County for the project and we continue to update it as we provide any updates to Collier County staff. So we will continue on through what's known as our Sufficiency Process until we get to our first planning commission hearing. And again, signs will be posted on the site when that hearing's established as well as mail notice is going out to surround the property members. 05:56 So that's our quick presentation. I'm happy to take any questions you may have from those attendees on Zoom. If you'd unmute if you have a question, that would be great. Robert Campbell: 06:11 The only question I have... Hello. My name's Robert Campbell. I'm with TGM Communities. We actually own TG and Bermuda Island directly across the Vanderbilt Road from the proposed site. I just had a question. Did you say that the document that you're sharing now will be uploaded onto the gradyminor.com planning website? Sharon Umpenhour: 06:35 It's already there. Wayne Arnold: 06:35 Yes, sir. It's there now. It'll be shared- Robert Campbell: 06:36 Oh, this version is already there, correct? Wayne Arnold: 06:37 It is. We uploaded that late this afternoon. Robert Campbell: 06:39 Okay. Much appreciated. It looks exciting. Wayne Arnold: 06:46 Thank you. Any other comments or questions? I know there's another attendee on the Zoom. Robert Campbell: 06:54 He's actually a colleague of mine. Wayne Arnold: 06:55 Oh, okay. Great. Sharon Umpenhour: 06:56 Mr. Ruiz, is that your colleague? 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 673 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) PL20220001010 – MATTSON AT VANDERBILT RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT; AND PL20220001011 – MATTSON AT VANDERBILT RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT May 24, 2023, NIM Transcript Page 4 of 4 Robert Campbell: 06:59 It is, correct. Wayne Arnold: 07:01 Okay. Sharon Umpenhour: 07:01 Oh, okay. Thank you. Wayne Arnold: 07:01 Great. Well, we're happy to answer any questions you may have as we go through the process or if you all think of anything else, we're glad to get information to you. We appreciate you. Robert Campbell: 07:10 No, I think everything looks great. I appreciate the presentation. Looking forward to seeing how it all plays out. Wayne Arnold: 07:17 Okay, well great. Thank you so much. Well, with that, I guess we'll adjourn. Thanks for participating and look forward to hearing from you. Thanks. Robert Campbell: 07:24 All right, have a great day. Robert Ruiz: 07:26 Thank you all. 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 674 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) PETITIONS:PL20220001010 -MATTSON AT VANDERBILT RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT (GMPA); ANDPL20220001011 -MATTSON AT VANDERBILT RPUD May 24, 2023, Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) Project information and a copy of this presentation can be found on our website: GRADYMINOR.COM/PLANNING/ 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 675 PROJECT TEAM: •3333/3375 VBR, LLC – Applicant •Andy Bollig, Development Partner –Roers Acquisitions LLC •Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq., Land Use Attorney –Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. •D. Wayne Arnold, AICP, Professional Planner –Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. •Michael Delate, P.E., Civil Engineer –Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. •James M. Banks, PE, Traffic Engineer –JMB Transportation Engineering, Inc. •Marco A. Espinar, Environmental Planning/Biologist –Collier Environmental Consultants, Inc. *Please note, all information provided is subject to change until final approval by the governing authority. 2 INTRODUCTION 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 676 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - 3 LOCATION MAP 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 677 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - FUTURE LAND USE (FLU)DESIGNATION: Existing:Urban Designation,Mixed Use District,Urban Residential Subdistrict Proposed:Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict ZONING: Existing:A, Agricultural Proposed:Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD PROPOSED REQUEST: •Modify the FLU map to add The Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential Subdistrict •Rezone from the A, Agricultural,Zoning District to the Mattson at Vanderbilt Residential PUD •To allow a maximum of 150 multi-family rental units. PROJECT INFORMATION 4 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 678 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - 5 FUTURE LANDUSE MAP -EXISTING 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 679 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - 6 FUTURE LANDUSE MAP -PROPOSED Proposed Subdistrict Language: 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 680 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - 7 PROPOSED MASTER PLAN 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 681 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - 8 CONCEPTUAL SITE RENDERING 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 682 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - 9 CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE RENDERING 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 683 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - 10 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 684 11 CONCEPTUAL RENDERINGS 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 685 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - NEXT STEPS •File resubmittal •Hearing Notices mailed to adjacent property owners within 500 feet of the subject property. •Hearing sign posted on property advertising hearing dates. •HEARING DATES: •CCPC –T BD, 9:00 a.m., Collier County Government Center, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, 3rd floor BCC Chamber, Naples, FL, 34112 •BCC –TBD, 9:00 a.m., Collier County Government Center, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, 3rd floor BCC Chamber, Naples, FL, 34112 12 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 686 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - Project information and a copy of this presentation can be found online: WWW.GRADYMINOR.COM/PLANNING Collier County Growth Management Department (GMD) Public Portal: CVPORTAL.COLLIERCOUNTYFL.GOV/CITYVIEWWeb CONTACTS: •Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A.: Sharon Umpenhour, Senior Planning Technician; sumpenhour@gradyminor.com or 239.947.1144 •Collier County Staff:T imothy Finn; Timothy.Finn@colliercountyfl.gov, 239)252-4312 Katherine Eastley; Katherine.Eastley@colliercountyfl.gov, (239) 252-2834 PROJECT DOCUMENTS AND INFORMATION 13 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 687 Attachment: Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials (27094 : PL20220001011 - SIGN POSTING INSTRUCTIONS (CHAPTER 8, COLLIER COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT) A zoning sign(s) must be posted by the petitioner or the petitioner’s agent on the parcel for a minimum of fifteen (15) calendar days in advance of the first public hearing and said sign(s) must be maintained by the petitioner or the petitioner’s agent through the Board of County Commissioners Hearing. Below are general guidelines for signs, however these guidelines should not be construed to supersede any requirement of the LDC. For specific sign requirements, please refer to the Administrative Code, Chapter 8 E. 1. The sign(s) must be erected in full view of the public, not more than five (5) feet from the nearest street right-of-way or easement. 2. The sign(s) must be securely affixed by nails, staples, or other means to a wood frame or to a wood panel and then fastened securely to a post, or other structure. The sign may not be affixed to a tree or other foliage. 3. The petitioner or the petitioner’s agent must maintain the sign(s) in place, and readable condition until the requested action has been heard and a final decision rendered. If the sign(s) is destroyed, lost, or rendered unreadable, the petitioner or the petitioner’s agent must replace the sign(s) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER BEFORE THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, PERSONALLY APPEARED SHARON UMPENHOUR WHO ON OATH SAYS THAT HE/SHE HAS POSTED PROPER NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 10.03.00 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE ON THE PARCEL COVERED IN PETITION NUMBER(S) PL20220001010 and PL20220001011. 3800 Via Del Rey SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT OR AGENT STREET OR P.O. BOX Sharon Umpenhour as Senior Planning Technician for Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. Bonita Springs, Florida 34110 NAME (TYPED OR PRINTED) CITY, STATE ZIP STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF LEE The foregoing instrument was sworn to and subscribed before me this 17 day of November , 2023, by Sharon Umpenhour as Senior Planning Technician for Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A., personally known to me or who produced as identification and who did/did not take an oath. Signature of Notary Public Carin J. Dwyer Printed Name of Notary Public My Commission Expires: (Stamp with serial number) Rev. 3/4/2015 NOTE: AFTER THE SIGN HAS BEEN POSTED, THIS AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE SHOULD BE RETURNED NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORKING DAYS BEFORE THE FIRST HEARING DATE TO THE ASSIGNED PLANNER. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 688 Attachment: Attachment D - Hearing Advertising Sign (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 689 Attachment: Attachment D - Hearing Advertising Sign (27094 : PL20220001011 - Mattson at Vanderbilt RPUD (PUDZ))