HEX Final Decision 2023-36HEX NO. 2023-36
HEARING EXAMINER DECISION
DATE OF HEARING.
October 26, 2023
PETITION.
Petition No. BDE-PL20230006459 -178 Tahiti Circle (BDE)— Request for a 27-foot boat dock
extension, over the maximum 20 feet allowed by Section 5.03.06.E.1 of the Collier County
Land Development Code for waterways 100 feet or greater in width, to construct a new dock
facility that will protrude a total of 47 feet into a waterway that is 219f feet wide for the
benefit of property located at 178 Tahiti Circle, also known as Lot 155, Isles of Capri No. 2,
in Section 32, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida.
GENERAL PURPOSE FOR THE PETITION.
The petitioner seeks to construct a 2-slip dock facility perpendicular to the shoreline, with two
boatlifts; one to accommodate a 44-foot vessel and the other to be decked over to serve two
personal watercrafts (PWCs).
STAFF RECOMMENDATION.
Approval with conditions.
FINDINGS.
The Hearing Examiner has jurisdiction over this Petitioner pursuant to Sec. 2-87(4) of the
Collier County of Ordinances, Sec. 8.10.00 of the Land Development Code, and Chapter 9 of
the County Administrative Code.
2. The public hearing for this Petition was properly noticed and conducted in accordance with all
County and state requirements.
3. The public hearing was conducted electronically and in -person in accordance with
Emergency/Executive Order 2020-04.
4. The Petitioner and/or Petitioner's representative executed the Hybrid Virtual Quasi -Judicial
Public Hearing Waiver related to conducting the public hearing electronically and in -person.
5. The is a concurrent land use application, Building Permit Application No. PRFH2O220416412
that has been issued for a 3-story single-family dwelling, and construction has commenced;
the permit is currently in "inspect" status.
Page 1 of 7
6. The County Staff presented the Petition followed by the Petitioner and/or Petitioner's
representative, public comment and then rebuttal by the Petitioner and/or Petitioner's
representative. Sandra Clark and Jerry Clark owning property with Michael and Lynn Clark
at 194 Tahiti Circle appeared to voice their objections regarding the encroachment of their
views due to Petitioner's request for a dock facility protruding 47 feet into the waterway, if the
petition is approved. Robert Bucker, an attorney and property owner residing at 168 Tahiti
Circle appeared to voice his opinion that he did not believe that the secondary criteria No. 1
requiring the need for a special condition met the criterion. He stated that Petitioner is creating
a need or a issue in order to satisfy this criterion. He also spoke regarding the encroachment of
his view if the petition is approved.
7. The Petitioner unsuccessfully applied for a BDE for a larger vessel and dock facility that would
have been perpendicular to Petitioner's shoreline and would have significantly blocked their
neighbor's waterfront views. Petitioner owns a smaller vessel at their current home on Tahiti
Circle. They now wish to keep their current vessel and construct a dock facility for it at their
new home that will be at an angle to their shoreline — an improvement from the prior proposal
for the waterfront view of their abutting property owners on the east. Another waterfront view
improvement and to prevent mooring of another vessel on the east side of the proposed dock
facility would be to eliminate all decking on the east side of the boatlift — the 4' and 2' catwalks.
There is plenty of room and deck space on the west side of the boatlift to safely access the
vessel. It is not safe to walk on a 2' catwalk. Eliminating the 4' and 2' catwalk plus piles on
the east side of the boatlift is an improvement to the design.
8. The County's Land Development Section 5.03.06.H. lists the criteria for dock facility
extensions. The Hearing Examiner may approve, approve with conditions, or deny a boat dock
extension request if it is determined that at least four (4) of the five (5) primary criteria, and at
least four (4) of the six (6) secondary criteria have been met.'
Primary Criteria:
1. Whether the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate in relation
to the waterfront length, location, upland land use and zoning of the subject property.
Consideration should be made of property on unbridged barrier islands, where vessels are
the primary means of transportation to and from the property. (The number should be
appropriate; typical single-family use should be no more than two slips; typical multi-
family use should be one slip per dwelling unit; in the case of unbridged barrier island
docks, additional slips may be appropriate.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the criterion HAS
BEEN MET. The subject property comprises 0.18 acres located within an RSF-4 zoning
district upon which a single-family dwelling is presently being constructed by means of
Building Permit No. PRFH2O220416412 and the proposed project consists of a dock
'The Hearing Examiner's findings are italicized.
Page 2 of 7
facility with two boatlifts, one to accommodate a 44 foot vessel and the other to be decked
over for two personal watercrafts (PWO).
2. Whether the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the general
length, type and draft as that described in the petitioner's application is unable to launch or
moor at mean low tide (MLT). (The petitioner's application and survey should establish
that the water depth is too shallow to allow launching and mooring of the vessel(s)
described without an extension.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the criterion HAS
BEEN MET. The boat dock extension is necessary to accommodate the owners' vessels
due to the existing on -site water depths being too shallow within the allowed 20 feet. The
subject shoreline consists of a seawall with no rip -rap out in front. Still, the existing on -
site water depths indicated on the attached survey are too shallow for any vessel with a 3-
foot draft to be properly moored within the allowed 20 feet, as indicated on sheets 13 & 14
of 14.
The proposed 44 foot vessel is advertised as having a 3-foot draft with a boatlift and the
cross -support beams being at least 12 ". The overall depth of water needed to float this
vessel on and off the boatlift is at least 4. S feet. Based on those facts and the existing onsite
water depths, the BDE is needed to reach sufficient water depths, as shown in the attached
BDE exhibits. Also, with the adjacent dock and boathouse being within the applicant's
riparian area, which is considered grandfathered structures, and with no docking facility
on the east side, it was determined the best option was to angle the dock towards the west
to allow more flexibility for the owners or future owners to the east on a dock design if one
was ever proposed as well as be as lease impactful to their current view of the subject
waterway.
Additionally, on sheets 13 & 14 of 14, there are two exhibits to show the maximum sized
vessel being 40 feet that can fit within the required 1 S foot setbacks and 20 feet of
protrusion. The issue is the fact that the water depths are still too shallow for any vessel
with a 3-foot or greater draft to be moored within the allowable area, especially when a
boatlift is proposed.
3. Whether the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation within an
adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. (The facility should not intrude into any
marked or charted navigable channel thus impeding vessel traffic in the channel.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the criterion HAS
BEENMET. There are no marked channels within this section of Johnson Bay. Therefore,
the entire waterway provides safe navigation. It is further noted that there is a natural
shoal area to the NW as a vessel exits Marlin Bay out to Johnson Bay. However, it's a local
knowledge channel that one navigates parallel to the shoreline to reach the nearest marked
channel. As proposed, the dockfacility will also maintain the ingress/egress to neighboring
docks.
Page 3 of 7
4. Whether the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25 percent of the width of the
waterway, and whether a minimum of 50 percent of the waterway width between dock
facilities on either side is maintained for navigability. (The facility should maintain the
required percentages.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the criterion HAS
BEEN MET. The subject waterway is 219± feet wide at this point, and the proposed dock
protrusion is 47 feet or 21.46 percent of the waterway. The distance between dockfacilities
is 146 feet; 66.67 percent of the waterway remains clear for navigation.
5. Whether the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the facility would
not interfere with the use of neighboring docks. (The facility should not interfere with the
use of legally permitted neighboring docks.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the criterion HAS
BEEN MET. The proposed docking facility is consistent with the other docks within this
bay and the adjacent bay on the Isles of Capri. The dock design ensures that the vessel and
dock are all within the required setbacks, puts the stern of the vessel in the deeper water,
maintains access to the existing dock immediately adjacent to the west property line, and
ensures any future dock constructed on the eastern adjacent property will have
unobstructed access.
Secondary Criteria:
1. Whether there are special conditions not involving water depth, related to the subject
property or waterway, which justify the proposed dimensions and location of the proposed
dock facility. (There must be at least one special condition related to the property; these
may include type of shoreline reinforcement, shoreline configuration, mangrove growth,
or seagrass beds.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the criterion HAS
BEENMET. Riprap is not a factor as it was previously determined that there is no riprap
along the subject property shoreline. The one special condition that was taken into
consideration is the existing neighboring dock, which is partially within the applicant's
riparian area, with no setback provided. This was the most restrictive existing condition
design factor considered in that we could design the ingress/egress of our proposed slips
to avoid conflict. This was the driving factor behind putting our vessel ingress/egress to
come/cross over the western riparian line, as it is unknown what the adjacent property
with no existing dock could or would propose in the future. Additionally, the subject
property location on a wider waterway allows the proposed dock to protrude further out
into the waterway without impacting navigation.
2. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe access to the vessel for
loading/unloading and routine maintenance, without the use of excessive deck area not
directly related to these functions. (The facility should not use excessive deck area.)
Page 4 of 7
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the criterion HAS
BEENMET with the condition below that the east 4' and 2' catwalk and piles be removed.
With the removal of the eastside catwalks, the proposed dock facility has been minimized
to the fullest extent possible and provides deck area for routine maintenance, safe access,
recreational activities like fishing, and storage of kayaks and/or paddleboards.
3. For single-family dock facilities, whether the length of the vessel, or vessels in
combination, described by the petitioner, exceeds 50 percent of the subject property's
linear waterfront footage. (The applicable maximum percentage should be maintained.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the criterion HAS
NOT BEEN MET. The proposed dockfacility has been redesigned to accommodate a 44-
foot vessel and two personal watercrafts (PWCs), each approximately 12 feet long. The
subject shoreline is 70± feet long; therefore, the vessel size will exceed the 50% threshold.
The prior design, denied by HEX Decision No. 2022-42, was for a 50 foot vessel that also
reduces the requested protrusion.
4. Whether the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view of
neighboring property owners. (The facility should not have a major impact on the view of
a neighboring property owner.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that with the condition
that the east 4' and 2' catwalk and piles be remove the criterion HAS BEEN MET. As
proposed, the dock has been designed within the designated setbacks and is consistent with
the other previously approved BDE boat docks perpendicular to the shoreline. This allows
you to design within the allowed Riparian area and avoid ingress/egressing over either of
the shared riparian lines. Based on our analysis, as shown on the BDE exhibits, the overall
impacts to each adjacent property owner are indicated. The proposed dock will not have a
major impact on their views of the waterway. As indicated in the exhibit, at 20-Feet, the
eastern property owner's view would be open to 99-degrees, and the proposed dock would
be reduced to 93-degrees. Therefore, based on this analysis, their view is only slightly
obstructed and should not have a major impact on anyone's view. The Petitioner's prior
BDE proposal with a larger vessel, larger dock, and oriented perpendicular to the
shoreline had a major impact on the waterfront view. The new proposal with a smaller
vessel and arrangement at an angle to the shoreline is an improved design to accommodate
the waterfront view of the east neighbor. Eliminating the east 4' and 2' catwalk and piles
is also an improvement.
5. Whether seagrass beds will be impacted by the proposed dock facility. (If seagrass beds
are present, compliance with subsection 5.03.06.J of the LDC must be demonstrated.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the criterion HAS
BEENMET. No seagrass beds are present on the property nor the neighboring properties
within 200 feet of the existing dock structure.
Page 5 of 7
6. Whether the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of
subsection 5.03.06(E)(11) of this Code. (If applicable, compliance with section
5.03.06(E)(11) must be demonstrated.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the criterion is
NOT APPLICABLE. The provisions of the Collier County Manatee Protection Plan do
not apply to single-family dockfacilities exceptfor those within the seawalled basin of Port
of the Islands; the subject property is not located within Port of the Islands.
ANALYSIS.
Based on a review of the record including the Petition, application, exhibits, the County's staff
report, and hearing comments and testimony from the Petitioner and/or the Petitioner's
representative(s), County staff and any given by the public, the Hearing Examiner finds that there
is enough competent, substantial evidence as applied to the criteria set forth in Section 5.03.06.11
of the Land Development Code to approve Petition. The Petition meets 5 out of 5 of the primary
criteria and 4 out of 6 secondary criteria, with one criterion being not applicable.
DECISION.
The Hearing Examiner hereby APPROVES Petition Number BDE-PL20230006459, filed by Jeff
Rogers of Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. representing Kenneth J. and Kathleen A. Demaret, Co -
Trustees, Kenneth and Kathleen Demaret 2009 Family Trust, with respect to the property described
as 0.18± acres located at 178 Tahiti Circle and is legally described as Lot 155, Isles of Capri No.
2, in Section 32, Township 51 South, Range 26 East. Collier County, Florida, for the following:
• The petitioner requests a 27-foot boat dock extension, over the maximum 20 feet allowed
by Section 5.03.06.E.1 of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) for
waterways 100 feet or greater in width, to construct a new dock facility that will protrude
a total of 47 feet into a waterway that is 219± feet wide for the benefit of the subject
property.
Said changes are fully described in the Site and Dock Plans attached as Exhibit "A" and are subject
to the condition(s) set forth below.
ATTACHMENTS.
Exhibit A — Site and Dock Plans
LEGAL DESCRIPTION.
0.18± acres located at 178 Tahiti Circle and is legally described as Lot 155, Isles of Capri No. 2,
in Section 32, Township 51 South, Range 26 East. Collier County, Florida
Page 6 of 7
CONDITIONS.
1. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the
development.
2. A Certificate of Completion cannot be approved for the subject dock facility until such
time as a Certificate of Occupancy has been issued for the principal structure, to wit, a
single-family dwelling.
3. The east 4' and 2' catwalks and piles shall be eliminated from the design and plans.
DISCLAIMER.
Pursuant to Section 125.022(5) F.S., issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any
way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency
and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant
fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or
undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law.
APPEALS —
This decision becomes effective on the date it is rendered. An appeal of this decision shall be done
in accordance with applicable ordinances, codes and law.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AND EXHIBITS: SEE CLERK OF COURT, MINUTES
AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. DECISIONS OF THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR
VARIANCES, CONDITIONAL USES, AND BOAT DOCK EXTENSIONS SHALL BE
NOTED ON THE ZONING MAP FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES.
Date
Andrew Dickman, Esq., AICP
Hearing Examiner
Page 7 of 7
EXHIBIT "A"
S-1FA-T E O IF F L O R M DA
CV.
NAPLES
G
0
0 91
SUBJECT
PROPERTY MARCO
ISLAND
GULF OF MEXICO
b TAMPA
FT MYER
APL S M
P
RGLADES CITY KEY WEST
COLLIER COUNTY
SITE ADDRESS:
<> 178 TAHITI CIR <> LATITUDE: I
NAPLES, FL 34113 <> LONGITUDE: '
NOTES:
<> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PU
AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTIC
VICINITY MAP
COUNTY AERIAL
DESIGNED: JR 11. 1 RMJ 08-0423 JR SHTS 02-06,10,12-14
Turrell, Hall &Associates, Inc. —1 7 g TA H 1—T 1 C 1 R DRAWN BY RMJ 2
CREATED: 06-06-23 3.
Marine & EnvironmentalConsulting -
JOB NO, 21145 4.
t3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732 LOCATION MAP SHEET NO.: 01 OF 14 15.
Email: tuna c@turrell-associatesxom Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 �a.�N G,aF, p, a m ,,,,g„ Ft N SECTION-32 TOWNSHIP- 51 S RANGE- 26 E
�..
+� EXISTING ADJACENT
BOATHOUSE, ROOF
� AND WALKWAY
�. r
Terrell, Hall &Associates, Inc.
Marine &Environmental Consulting
3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732
Email: tuna@tuaell-associates,com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632
p �
70'
EXISTING
SEAWALL
.�.�,—
SUBJECT
PROPERTY
SITE ADDRESS:
178 TAHITI CIR
NAPLES, FL 34113
o T 30 6a
S'C.�tCE9N�'J°i7
MHW/MLW MOSTLY ABUTS
THE FACE OF THE SEAWALL
*'--
a .�.
'1 � g -TA H I T I C I R
EXISTING CONDITIONS
u
t
NOTES:
• THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND
ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.
• ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW
• SURVEY COURTESY OF: "COURT GREGORY SURVEYING, INC."
•• SURVEY DATED: 04-1&23
• APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF): 70'
• EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF): 0
• WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX): 219'
• TIDAL DATUM:
•• MHW (NAND)= +0.42'
•• MLW (NAND)= -1.63'
DESIGNED: I JR I �, j RM�&0423 I JR I REVISED NOTE BOX
SECTION-32 TOWNSHIP-5'IS RANGE-26E
m
0
C9
m
y
EXISTING ADJACENT
BOATHOUSE, ROOF
AND WALKWAY
t
M
i
f
N
A.
W x 4.7 Z
XZ IX-s.0 X 4.9 X 4.7 4.6 X4.7Q S
.0 D
X-4•s
X -4.7 X -4.5 X -4.5 Q
x-4.a o r� 30 60
a.3
X-4.5 X-4.3 X-42
X-4.3
.s X-4.5 X.4.3 X-4.1 X-3.3 I iC?{CE9N�EE7
X 4.0 X-4.0 X-4.0
X -3.5 X -3.5
X -3.5 X -3.5 X-3.5 X-3.5 X-3.5
X-3.0
X X -3.0 X-3.0 X-3.0
_
2.5 X-2.5 X-2.5 X-2.5 X-2.5
X-2.SX-2.5
X-2.4 X-_ 4 X-2.5
X X 25
2,0 -2.o
MHW/MLW MOSTLY ABUTS
* _ THE FACE OF THE SEAWALL
EXISTING
SEAWALL
x-s
x
X-a
SUBJECT
PROPERTY
SITE ADDRESS:
178 TAHITI CIR
NAPLES, FL 34113
jj
s
11.
Turrell, Hall &Associates, Inc. -1 � g TA H I T I C I R
Marine &Environmental Consulting
3584ExchangeAve. Naples, FL34104-3732 EXISTING CONDITIONS WITH DEPTHS
Email: tuna@tmrell-associates.com Phone: (239) 6434166 Fax: (239) 6434632
Cl
NOTES:
THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND
ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE
ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW
SURVEY COURTESY OF: "COURT GREGORY SURVEYING, INC.'
•• SURVEY DATED: 04A$43
• APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF): 70'
EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF): 0
WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX): 219'
TIDAL DATUM:
•• MHW (NAVD)= +0.42'
MLW NAVD = -1.63'
DESIGNED: JR 7. RMJ 08-0423 JR REVISED NOTE BOX
CREATED: 06-06.23 3. - -
JOB NO.: 21145 4,
SHEET NO.: 03 OF 14 5.
SECT
I0N-32 TOWNSHIP-51S RANGE-26E
1R
JOHNSON
BAY
x PROPOSED HAND
RAILING TO PREVENT
n ADDITIONAL MOORING
PROPOSED 12'X12.5'
DECKED OVER LIFT
FOR 2 PWC
EXISTING ADJACENT
BOATHOUSE, ROOF
AND WALKWAY
Turrell, Hall &Associates, Inc.
Marine &Environmental Consulting
3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732
Email: tuna@mrrell-associates.com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632
PROPOSED
FIXED DOCK
12.5' —
40'
EXISTING
SEAWALL
y4
SUBJECT
PROPERTY
N
�_-.A : .
'�wE
s
o To SC?{CE9N�EE7 �o
PROPOSED 16'X16'
BOAT LIFT WITH 44'
_ LOA VESSEL
MARLIN
BAY._
PROPOSED HAND
15' RAILING TO PREVENT
ADDITIONAL MOORING
MHW/MLW MOSTLY ABUTS
THE FACE OF THE SEAWALL
'1 �g TAH I T I C I R
PROPOSED DOCK -DIMENSIONS
NOTES:
• THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND
ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.
• ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW
• SURVEY COURTESY OF: "COURT GREGORY SURVEYING, INC:'
•• SURVEY DATED: 04-16.23
• APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF): 70'
• EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF): 0
• WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX): 219'
• TIDAL DATUM:
•• MHW (NAVD)= +0.42'
• MLW (NAVD)= -1.63'
• •PROPOSED OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF): 747
• TOTAL OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF): 747
• TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM PROPERTY LINE: 47'
DESIGNED: JR 1. RMJ 08-0423 JR REVISED NOTE BOX
-
CREATED:
JOB NO.: 21145 4.
SHEET NO.: 1 04 OF 14 1 15. 1 - I I-
SECTION-32
TOWNSHIP-5'IS RANGE-26E
i
I
JOHNSON '� PROPOSED
BAY � FIXED DOCK
w
Z + X -4.7
J
Z
Q
� X -4.7 X - .6
Qd ', X -4.9
X -5.0
-5.0
PROPOSED 12'X12.5' X _4.
DECKED OVER LIFT � X �'8 X -
'C -4.2
FOR 2 PWC 4
-- I X -4.5 -4.3 �, 3
X-4.0 � 3 5
X
-3.5 �,
X-.
-3.0 - _3. 3.0
.5 ;,
�' -2.0 X - ♦ -2.5
EXISTING ADJACENT _1 �
� BOATHOUSE, ROOF -- a�-� 4 s " ., ;i
AND WALKWAY
s ; � y -� • � EXISTING
e
,_ � �� SEAWALL
SUBJECT
J PROPERTY
r�
PROPOSED 16'X16'
BOAT LIFT WITH 44'
LOA VESSEL
i
X -4.7
X -4.5
X -4.3
X -4.0
X -3.5
X -3.0
X -2.5
X -4.5
a ro 2a yo
sc�rc��N��
MARLIN
BAY
i X -3+.5
�MHW/MLW MOSTLY ABUTS
� THE FACE OF THE SEAWALL
X -2.5
X -2.
�� X -1.5
w � �'
Terrell, Hall &Associates, Inc, -1 7 g T'A H I T I C I R
Marine &Environmental Consulting
3584ExchangeAve. Naples, FL34104-3732 PROPOSED DOCK -DEPTHS
Email: tuna@tulrell-associates.com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632,„�EoaA����,aE�q,EAM���.,,,A�,sEs„�,,.,u�.AE�,„�.�N�F�.�a�oNs,�„m�u��E
NOTES:
• THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND
ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE
• ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW
• SURVEY COURTESY OF: "COURT GREGORY SURVEYING, INC."
•• SURVEY DATED: 0416-23
• APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF): 70'
• EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF): 0
• WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX): 219'
• TIDAL DATUM:
•• MHW (NAND)= +0.42'
• MLW (NAND)= -1.63'
• •PROPOSED OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF): 747
• TOTAL OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF): 747
• TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM PROPERTY UNE: 4T
DESIGNED; JR 7. RMJ 08-04-23 JR REVISED NOTE BOX
DRAWN BY: RMJ 2. - - -
CREATED: O6A6.23 3. - -
JOB NO.: 21145 4.
SHEET NO.: OS OF 14 5.
SECTION-32 TOWNSHIP-51S RANGE-26E
N
>'
N
O
a
3
m
m
WRAPPED FROM 12"
ABOVE MHW TO 6"
BELOW SUBSTRATE
_ Turrell, Hall &Associates, Inc. —1 � g
Marine &Environmental Consulting
3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732
Email:tuna@turrell-associates.com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 _
J C l� I I V I V /'1-t1
—TA H 1 T� 1
CROSS SECTION AA
CI R
DESIGNED: I JR
SECTION- 32
0 3 6 r2
sc.�E�N��r
iT•TSkI
TOWNSHIP- 5'I S
RANGE- 26 E
PROPOSEDr
FIXED DOCK
N -
I #004
�
ad
LA
Nw--
,
44
es, jIIl
jolt me I
ee
r�
CZ
ell
lie r
--1 dFk i V % ? V I L k
14
�y
It
W/e-ell
' r� 1
r` =fd
`
el
We
23' L_ ry r I caY i' I %� 1�o 300 el e lie,
10,44 lie
rah"
-, .
t -.Id �5
+iiW� — . a m_
—s.
1�
NOTE: .
'33 Ile,
l + THE DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE frlc
WAND ARE TAKE_ N FR__OM THE AERIAL IMAG/E.
ell lira
e We
.v.
DESIGNED: JR 1
Turrell, Hall &Associates, Inc. I 7 g CREATED:
TA H 1 T 1 C 1 R DRAWN BY: RMJ 2. _
3 3.
Marine &Environmental Consulting - - - -
JOB NO.: 21145 21145 4.
3584ExchangeAve. Naples, FL34104-3732 ADJACENT DOCKS -NORTH SHEET NO.: 07OF14 5.
Email:tuna@tunell-asso6ates.com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 SECTION-32 TOWNSHIP- 5'I S RANGE- 26E
PROPOSED
FIXED DOCK
T—
wag
t , :All
N`
L
a roo 200 400 ��
41, SC�{PE9N�EE7 'fte Ilk
°Iva
TAN
NOTE:
THE DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE !
AND ARE TAKEN FROM THE•� �A�ERIAL IMAGE. 92 L
�e �.,! F N-ram �4
AL VIP
�.
DESIGNED: JR 1.v.
Turrell, Hall &Associates, Inc. —1 7 g TA 1-1 1 T 1 C 1 IR DRAWN RMJ
Marine & Environmental Consulting CREATEDD:: O6-0E 23 3.
JOB NO.: 2114 44. - -
h
Email:tuna@turrell-associates.com
3584
Exc angeAve. Naples, FL34104-3732
Phone:(239)643-0166 Fax: (239)
643-6632
ADJACENT
DOCKS -SOUTH
SHEETNO.:
080F14
5.
_
SECTION-32
TOWNSHIP-59S RANGE-26E
1
TYPICAL DIVE TRANSECT
FJ
V
0 20 40 80
SC?{CE9N�EE�
aj
— — — — — — TRANSECTS (TYP)
Turrell, Hall &Associates, Inc.
Marine &Environmental Consulting
3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732
Email: tuna�n turrell-associates.com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632
SUBJECT
PROPERTY
SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY
NO SEAGRASSES WERE
OBSERVED GROWING
WITHIN 200 FT OF THE
PROPOSED PROJECT
NOTES:
•
THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND
ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.
• SURVEY COURTESY OF: "COURT GREGORY SURVEYING, INC."
SURVEY DATED: 04-18-23
DESIGNED: IJR
SECTION-32
TOWNSHIP-5'IS RANGE-26E
I
a 2� ga +oo
SCP{C2.9N �'i'7
NOTE:
THE DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE
AND ARE TAKEN FROM THE AERIAL IMAGE,
PROPOSED
FIXED DOCK
Terrell, Hall &Associates, Inc.
Marine &Environmental Consulting
3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732
Email: tuna c&mrell-associates.com Phone: (239) 64M166 Fax: (239) 6434632
_m
N
I
'I�g TAH1�1
WIDTH OF WATERWAY
CIR
1�
DESIGNED:
SECTION- 32
MARLIN
BAY
TOWNSHIP-5'IS RANGE-26E
��
:��
��.�
s
0 25 ga 100
SC?{LE9N�EE7
JOHNSON
BAY
PROPOSED
FIXED DOCK
.f _ __
��
�i
-� .,,.�.
._
ST
OVERLAY
��
�` ��'
�.�
s'
-,
;� .
DESIGNED: JR
Turrell, Hall &Associates, Inc. —1 7 g —rA H 1—r 1 C 1 R CREATEDY� O6-0S-2
Marine &Environmental Consulting
JOB NO.: 21145
3584ExchangeAve. Naples, FL34104-3732 ST OVERLAY SHEETNO.: 110F1
MARLIN
BAY
_�
Email:tuna�ntuaell-assoclates.com Phone:(239)643-0166 Fax:(239)643-6632 ��a,�,N{�,a�nq�„M�,N�,,,q,��Es�H���,„EN�r,K,�N�E�,�q�,��,„„�,����E SECTION-32 TOWNSHIP-5'IS RANGE-26E
CURRENT
VIEW
IMPACTED
VIEW
ALLOWABLE000000000
FOOTPRINT
-
PROPERTY
BOUNDARY
Terrell, Hall &Associates, Inc.
Marine &Environmental Consulting
3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732
Email: rima@turrell-associates,com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632
0
N I ommppL
L'
VIEW EXHIBIT
IMPACTED
VIEW
N
s
o 20 40 80
SC�{CE7N�EE7
CURRENT
VIEW
'NOTE:
THE DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE
AND ARE TAKEN FROM THE AERIAL IMAGE, XMY 11A .r
^�+ DESIGNED: JR 1. RMJ 0&0423 JR ZOOMED IN FOR CLARITY
DRAWN BY: RMJ 2.
CREATED: 06-06-23 3
SHEET NO.: 120E 14 5.
SECTION-32 TOWNSHIP- 51S RANGE-26E
JOB NO.: 21146 4.
,u
0
0
Z
JOHNSON I - '"
BAY PROPOSED 16'X16'
BOAT LIFT WITH 40'
LOA VESSEL X4.7
w
Z15 X-.7 X -4.6
Z X -5.0 X -4.9
Q -5.0
Of X .4.7 X •5 X .4.5
d -4.8 >C 4.8 X 4.5 X 143
X -4.2
tiI X -4.5 X -4.5
i
X-4.0 X.
e ` X -3.5
-3.0
x -2.5x
-2.0 X
4110
Y Jew
EXISTING I PROPOSED
SEAWALL FIXED
DOCK
Turrell, Hall &Associates, Inc.
Marine &Environmental Consulting
3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732
Email: tuna@bTeEmassociates,com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643=6632
4.3
-X
BB
14 -3.
40'
40'
70�
SUBJECT
PROPERTY
X -3.5
X -3.0
X -2.5
a
X -2.0 ,
s
o ro 20 40
SC?(CE9N�E'Er
MARLI N
BAY
MHW/MLW MOSTLY ABUTS
THE FACE OF THE SEAWALL
X -2.5 a
DESIGNED: JR 1. RMJ 08.0423 JR ADDED SECTION SYMBOL
V -7�A H 1 T 1 V 1 ■ \ CRFANTEDvO6-0&23 3.
JOB NO.: 121145 4,
20 FT PROTRUSION DOCK SHEETNO.: 1130F14 5. 1 _I I I-
�E�F
QN1 Y AND .aN N USF SECTION-32 TOWNSHIP- 51S RANGE-26E
UP PILES
(TYP)
MHW = +0.42' NAVD 88
MLW = -1.63' NAVD 88
r
ALL PILINGS TO BE
WRAPPED FROM 12"
ABOVE MHW TO 6"
BELOW SUBSTRATE
Turrell, Hall &Associates, Inc.
Marine &Environmental Consulting
3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732
Email: tuna@lumell-associates.com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632
20' PROTRUSION FROM PROPERTY LINE
TO END OF DOCK PILE
16' BOAT LIFT
20' PROTRUSION DOCK
CROSS SECTION BB
0 3 g ro
S'CR.Cz 9NTZ ZT
DECKING
DEPTHS NOT
SUFFICIENT FOR LIFT
CI R
DESIGNED: JR 1, _ _ _
DRAWN BY: RMJ 2.
CREATED: OB-04-23 3.
J09 NO.: 21145 4.
SHEET NO.: 14 OF 14 5. _ _ _ _
ION- 32 SECT
TOWNSHIP-5'IS RANGE-26E