Loading...
HEX Final Decision 2023-26HEX NO. 2023-26 HEARING EXAMINER DECISION DATE OF HEARING. August 10, 2023. PETITION. Petition No. DR-PL20220006120 - Chokoloskee Church of God - A request for approval of a site plan with deviations from (1) LDC section 4.02.02 to allow a reduction in the minimum lot size requirement from 1.0 acres to f0.847 acres; (2) from LDC section 4.06.02.0 to allow for the buffer on the northern property line to be eliminated for ±67 feet from the western property line, and to allow the buffer on the northern property line to be reduced from 10 feet to 7.9 feet where there is an existing building and to allow two existing air conditioning pads to remain within the buffer; and (3) from LDC section 5.03.02.H to eliminate the requirement for a wall on the eastern border of the property where it abuts a residential use for the redevelopment of the Chokoloskee Church of God, consisting of f0.847 acres and located at 1236, 1244, and 1250 Demere Lane, Chokoloskee, in Section 31, Township 53 South, Range 29 East, Collier County, Florida. GENERAL PURPOSE FOR THE PETITION. The Petitioner desires to build a new church building where the multi -purpose building was and convert the existing church to its multi -purpose building. The proposed church, with 3,116 square feet under air, will be 232 square feet (8%) larger than the existing church, which has 2,884 square feet under air. The number of seats will remain the same. Deviation #1 is required to allow the +0.847-acre parcel to suffice for the minimum one -acre requirement. The applicant seeks two other deviations, one for a wall requirement and one for buffers. STAFF RECOMMENDATION. Approval with conditions. FINDINGS. 1. The Hearing Examiner has jurisdiction over this Petitioner pursuant to Sec. 2-87 of the Collier County of Ordinances, Sec. 8.10.00 of the Land Development Code, and Chapter 9 of the County Administrative Code. 2. The public hearing for this Petition was properly noticed and conducted in accordance with all County and state requirements. 3. The public hearing was conducted electronically and in -person in accordance with Emergency/Executive Order 2020-04. Page 1 of 8 4. The Petitioner and/or Petitioner's representative executed the Hybrid Virtual Quasi - Judicial Public Hearing Waiver related to conducting the public hearing electronically and in - person. 5. The notice for the August 10, 2023, Hearing Examiner hearing was provided by newspaper advertisement and mailed notice to owners within 500 feet of the site. 6. At the public hearing, the County Staff presented the Petition followed by the Petitioner and/or Petitioner's representative, public comments and then rebuttal by the Petitioner and/or Petitioner's representative. There were no objections made at the public hearing. ANAT.V.gM The petitioner is seeking three (3) deviations from the LDC requirements.) Primary Deviations Proposed Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.02.02 to allow a reduction in the minimum lot size from 1.0 acre to ±0.847 acres. The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the site has been developed as a church since the early 1900s and is a designated Collier County Historical site. The intent is to build the new sanctuary building in the location of a previous multi purpose building that was demolished due to significant hurricane damage in 2017. The number of seats within the church is not increasing. The site's redevelopment will allow the new sanctuary building to be constructed to current Florida Building Code (FBC) requirements and be designed with onsite parking and sidewalks to accommodate pedestrians. The church has existed and has been used for over 100 years. The proposed project will build a new, slightly larger church (232 sq. ft.) built to current FBC requirements. The number of seats in the church is not changing. As a by-product of building a new church, the congregation will be able to replace the multi purpose building it lost during Hurricane Irma by repurposing the current church. With the number of seats remaining unchanged and ample unused space on the property, the slightly smaller parcel size will have no negative impacts on surrounding property owners. There will not be a detrimental impact to the surrounding area. Proposed Deviation #2 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.H to eliminate the wall requirement between residential and non-residential development. The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the church has existed since 1913; there has never been a wall separating the church from the surrounding residences or road right-of-ways. The church was constructed before most, if not all, of the surrounding houses. A wall surrounding the church would give an unwelcoming feel to the church. Three sides of the church are separated from residences by right-of-ways. A 15 foot Type B buffer is being proposed 'The Hearing Examiner's findings are italicized. Page 2 of 8 on the fourth side where there is a residence. There is vegetation between the church and the house and one mature tree. The church is a long-standing institution in Chokoloskee, built over 100 years ago. Aside from minor improvements (chain link fence, basketball court, and small playground) and removing the accessory building badly damaged by Hurricane Irma in 2017, little has changed on the church property. Searching the records found a single code case (closed in 2003) for a sign. There have been zero complaints regarding the project. In this case, a wall would not lend aesthetic appeal nor provide a welcoming vista. The church abuts a public right-of-way on three sides; there will be buffers on each of these three sides. On the fourth side, where the wall would go, the Petitioner proposes installing a 1 S foot Type B buffer with 10 foot trees and a row of shrubs four feet on -center and five feet tall when planted. There will not be a detrimental impact to the surrounding area. Proposed Deviation #3 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02.C. to reduce the landscape buffer and eliminate the 10-foot Type D buffer along the northern property line where there is an existing drain field in the northwest corner of the property (±67 feet) and to reduce the buffer from 10 feet to 7.9 where there is an existing building, and to allow two existing air conditioning pads for the structure to remain within the buffer. The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the required buffer cannot be provided when there is an existing drain field within the northwest corner of the site. The current sanctuary building also prevents the ability to provide a 10' buffer along the northern property line; therefore, a reduction in the width of the required buffer is being sought in the location of the existing building. Two air conditioner pads for the existing building also exist within the proposed northern buffer; these pads cannot be relocated. The required Type D buffer will be provided along the remainder of the north property line. The eastern edge of the drain field is approximately 67 feet from the western property line. Trees in Type D buffers are required to be spaced no more than 30' on center. Type D buffers also require a double -row hedge adjacent to vehicular use areas like parking lots. This deviation will result in 2 fewer trees in the North buffer. Due to the location of the parking lot, most of the required hedges will not be installed. This deviation is supported due to the damage to drainfields that can result from digging and root intrusion. Final decisions on the exact plantings and spacing will be determined during SDP. Where the existing church building is within 7.9 to 9.0 feet from the property, it is not possible to fully comply with the required 10 foot Type D buffer. The same number of trees, or an equivalent planting, will be planted in this buffer section with a reduced width. Final decisions on the actual plantings will occur during the SDP process. There will not be a detrimental impact to the surrounding area. Section 10.02.03.F.7 Criteria The County's LDC Sections 10.02.03.F.7 lists the ten (10) criteria for a Site Plan with Deviations. The Hearing Examiner may approve, approve with conditions, or deny the request upon review and evaluation of the criteria in the Collier County Land Development Code. 1. Land uses and densities within the development shall be consistent with the permitted and approved conditional uses in the zoning district. Page 3 of 8 The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the proposed church and the existing church, proposed to be converted to a multi purpose building, are permitted conditional uses. No population density is associated with a church; the setbacks of the zoning district control development density. Setbacks for the proposed church are more than double what the code requires. The church has existed for more than 100 years; the size of the congregation has not significantly increased in recent years. With 100 years of history, the church has become an institution of Chokoloskee and a complement to the surrounding lands' uses and intensities. 2. The proposed development is consistent with the Growth Management Plan. The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the church was built circa 1913, the existing church is a permitted conditional use as it was constructed prior to Collier County being established as a county which occurred on May 8, 1923. A multi purpose building is considered an accessory use to a church and a permitted conditional use. Since the use is permitted, it must also be consistent with the Growth Management Plan. 3. The development shall have a beneficial effect both upon the area in which it is proposed to be established and upon the unincorporated area as a whole. The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that not including a new church built to current FBC standards, the net effect of the proposed project is the addition of a multi- purpose building that may increase opportunities as a meeting place for island residents. The proposed project is replacing like with like and will continue to complement the surrounding land uses and the whole island. Therefore, the church will remain consistent with the GMP, specifically Objective 5, whose purpose is to implement land use policies that promote sound planning, protect environmentally sensitive lands and habitat for listed species while protecting private property rights, ensure compatibility of land uses and further the implementation of the Future Land Use Element. 4. The total land area within the development and the area devoted to each functional portion of the development shall be adequate to serve its intended purpose. The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the concrete slab for the former multi purpose building and a basketball court, both of which are to be removed. A playground, which is to remain. Parking will be provided to the left of the current church building with handicapped parking below the proposed new church. The space for the new church is roughly a repurposing of the land formerly devoted to the basketball court and multi purpose building. There is ample room for the project without infringing on the rights of surrounding property owners. 5. Streets, utilities, drainage facilities, recreation areas, sizes and yards, architectural features, vehicular parking and loading facilities, sight distances, landscaping and buffers shall be appropriate for the particular use involved. The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that there will be no change to the streets surrounding the proposed project. Any utility or drainage work will occur either within the property or the roadway right-of-way. No change is proposed to the current playground Page 4 of 8 area. The new building's actual setbacks (yards) are twice what the LDC requires. Architectural features are not required as part of this petition and will be determined during SDP. Any potential impact on sight distances from the required buffering will be resolved during SDP. Landscape buffers will be new to the property, and allowing the two requested deviations to be accepted will meet code requirements. 6. Visual character of the project shall be equal or better in quality than that required by the development standards for the zoning district. The visual character of the project shall be better in quality than the existing project before redevelopment and after it was first permitted. The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the proposed new church, which will be similar in its overall appearance to the existing church. The new structure will be at least equal, and likely better, than the existing surrounding structures and will enhance the overall visual appearance of the area. 7. Areas proposed for common ownership shall be subject to a reliable and continuing maintenance guarantee. The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that at the time of Site Development Plan Amendment and Building Permit processing, the proposed development improvement is subject to reliable and continuing maintenance requirements and standard confirmation and authorization of common ownership. 8. Deviations shall be clearly delineated in the petition and shall be the minimum required to achieve the goals of the project and comply with these standards. The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the deviations are delineated. The first deviation, minimum lot size, is the minimum deviation possible as the parcel size cannot change. The third deviation, the modified buffer on the northern property line, is also the minimum deviation possible as the drain field cannot be planted on, and the existing building cannot be moved. The second deviation, to eliminate the wall requirement, may not be the minimum deviation possible, but from an effective and aesthetic viewpoint may be the most logical. As previously mentioned, there has never been a wall around the church property, which may be viewed as an uninviting vista. Secondly, a 1 S foot Type B buffer is being proposed in place of the wall, providing a more aesthetically pleasing landscape. 9. The petitioner has provided enhancements to the development. The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the project will include landscaped buffers surrounding the property where currently there is scant landscaping. The project will also add handicapped parking, sidewalks, and a multipurpose building that may also be used for some community events. 10. Approval of the deviation will not have an adverse effect on adjacent properties. The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the deviation to allow the new church to be built on the ±0.847-acre property is the smallest possible deviation as the parcel size cannot be changed. The buffer deviations are the smallest possible given the restrictions due Page 5 of 8 to the current development on the property built. Adjacent properties will benefit by having landscaping (buffers) where formerly there was none. Approval of the third deviation, substituting a landscape buffer to eliminate the wall requirement, will provide a more aesthetically appealing view from the neighboring property. Landscape Review The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the applicant requests a deviation related to a portion of the North buffer. The remainder of the North buffer and the buffers along the other perimeters labeled on the site plan (sheet 4) and the landscape plan are consistent with the LDC. A full review of the landscape plan will occur at the time of SDP submittal. Environmental Review The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the Environmental Planning staff has reviewed this petition. The request is to construct a new church sanctuary damaged by Hurricane Irma. The property was initially developed in 1913. A preservation area is not required since the property has been cleared and does not contain native vegetation or listed species. This project does not require Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project did not meet the EA scope of land development project reviews identified in Section 2- 1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. Conservation and Coastal Management Element (COME) The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that Environmental Planning staff has reviewed this petition. The request is to construct a new church sanctuary damaged by Hurricane Irma. The property was initially developed in 1913. A preservation area is not required since the property has been cleared and does not contain native vegetation or listed species. This project does not require Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews identified in Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. Conclusion Based on a review of the record including the Petition, application, exhibits, the County's staff report, and hearing comments and testimony from the Petitioner and/or the Petitioner's representative(s), County staff and any given by the public, the Hearing Examiner finds that there is enough competent, substantial evidence as applied to the criteria set forth in Section 10.02.03.F.7. of the LDC to approve the Petition. DECISION_ The Hearing Examiner hereby APPROVES Petition No, DR-PL20220006120, filed by Jessica Harrelson, AICP of Peninsula Engineering, representing the applicant, Chokoloskee Church of God, and described as 1236, 1244, and 1250 Demere Lane on Chokoloskee Island (commonly known as Chokoloskee) and consists of four contiguous parcels totaling f0.847 acres. Demere Lane is about one -quarter of a mile south of the island's northern terminus and abuts Smallwood Drive, the island's main road. Chokoloskee is connected to the mainland via a causeway and lies Page 6 of 8 approximately 2.5 miles southeast of Everglades City. The four parcels that comprise the subject property are in Section 36, Township 53 South, Range 29 East of Collier County, Florida, for the following: • An application for approval of a site plan with deviations for the Redevelopment (DR) petition to construct a new church building for the Chokoloskee Church of God. To facilitate this redevelopment project, the petitioner requests approval of a site plan with deviations pursuant to LDC 10.02.03.F. and seeks three deviations. Deviation #1, from LDC section 4.02.02, seeks to allow a reduction in the minimum lot size requirement from 1.0 acres to ±0.847 acres. Deviation #2, from LDC 5.03.02.H, requests eliminating the requirement for a wall along the eastern property line where the church (non-residential) abuts a residential use. Deviation #3, from LDC 4.02.06.C, seeks to allow for the buffer on the northern property line to be eliminated for ±67 feet from the western property line and to allow the buffer on the north property line to be reduced from 10 feet to 7.9 feet where there is an existing building, and to allow two existing air conditioning pads to remain within the buffer. Said changes are fully described in the proposed Site Development Plans attached as Exhibit "A" and enhanced Landscape Plan attached as Exhibit `B" and are subject to the condition(s) set forth below. ATTACHMENTS. Exhibit A — Site Development Plan Exhibit B — Landscape Plan LEGAL DESCRIPTION. 1236, 1244, and 1250 Demere Lane on Chokoloskee Island (commonly known as Chokoloskee) and consists of four contiguous parcels totaling ±0.847 acres. Demere Lane is about one -quarter of a mile south of the island's northern terminus and abuts Smallwood Drive, the island's main road. Chokoloskee is connected to the mainland via a causeway and lies approximately 2.5 miles southeast of Everglades City. The four parcels that comprise the subject property are in Section 36, Township 53 South, Range 29 East of Collier County, Florida CONDITIONS. 1. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development. 2. The deviations are limited to what is depicted on the Site Development Plans with deviations titled "Site Development Plans for the Chokoloskee Church of God" digitally signed on July 7, 2023, by Kevin McVicker, Professional Engineer License 51436. Landscape Plan for Chokoloskee Church of God, Project #CHCH-00 1 -00 1, digitally signed February 16, 2023, by Steve Sammons, Registered Landscape Architect, License #LA0001394 Page 7 of 8 DISCLAIMER. Pursuant to Section 125.022(5) F.S., issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. APPF, AI N. This decision becomes effective on the date it is rendered. An appeal of this decision shall be done in accordance with applicable ordinances, codes and law. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AND EXHIBITS: SEE CLERK OF COURT, MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. DECISIONS OF THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR VARIANCES, CONDITIONAL USES, AND BOAT DOCK EXTENSIONS SHALL BE NOTED ON THE ZONING MAP FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES. Date Andrew Dickman, Esq., AICP Hearing Examiner Page 8 of 8 EXHIBIT "A" PROPERTY OMER GIOXOLOSI(EEE CNUtCNOF GOO PO B0X301 GIJROLOSRE� F� �l�Je SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR THE CHOKOLOSKEE CHURCH OF GOD LOCATED IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 53 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST -r7J.4 it 110.xI.\.� N.T.S. Kevin Digitally signedby KevinMCVicke McVickerDate:2023.07.07 Floo r 13:51:16-04'00' 0 6 U we p o z :) ¢ gcg �I2 � O INDEX OF SHEETS 1. COVER SHEET R INDEX OF SHEETS 2. GENERALNOTES 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS d AERIAL PLAN 4. MASTER SIGNAGE 8 STRIPING SITE PLAN 5. MASTER DRAINAGE & GRADING PLAN 6. MASTER UTILITY PLAN 7. GENERAL DETAILS S. EROSION CONTROL & SWPPP 6 0 L7 L LL � ' o U o� = dU L U •gym W OU 3 0 z _ O 0 U CO RSNEET 9 no MADIXIIII TO JMUOWO IT it Naow� . c 14 17, i P VPTOS[PwnOTDVMMRvasrtu•,O.u,mrt dM flm1[.0 IT ISME aw eenwae<o�,�eanr..c.�O..cauridpu� w.cro,uu uT�..`�wro'.��.+�m Me weer«°d,.„uas u,wu.axo.rs.uPu,":oer.. unan w mutt ANO sERNCEs aREcmRr ��saitn miss 04APPLAIS as mile in m��wE� must TAKE nattiness TOP answer cartmurr ��ws ow DMIMMOrm nwm WAS Missile ROADWAY PANN3 ANO RESTORATION NOTES CtEARINO NOTE F' o eonepu..°.m n usro n mue unutt NOTE RECYCNNO NOTE cuATUNULL nu�wByIQ0.ipfIA1GT '.rise .....I �wa��u.u..w. Me I t� I rYSTb b�+F•a�+.ewv�Yr.reIANIA ••:jma�E�, a �� to oIs vig J � K ? O15g Zile a, i�is tax (7 < O t� I`OL U o? 9 U = t U Me •b W lU � Y z O Y 0 O u U }} s 3 °B06gtd 6EEPWI OENERAI NOTES I I I I ! I t's`q rel I rni �, /PRI qTE RR.p Iy \ T _ man_ I WI />tin maim #1 I FAATom, v �v ;� ; Law SAM ir FLA IF C \ pEhIERE Sam/Fol UP &, -�Rp �/ W w .ti / I I 77Y / I /f to / anava USr ` z\ ... VY \ \ \ I \ d f= a rc� U3 °a z d 1 �gR o o pcw U a ZA l�L iij! at is €;it O 2 �6 Y U z O ° O _ o O S U n � ,I i E 068 SEE FW! EX CQ4DITms ANO AEfl�IFL PUN „ EEII� aEss .. ...-1 \� `ME RESIOEI ZOIIIII41G'"It lob, ZOINNONR ..u.ol�Y - P/RA�R� tee®� j za<ta.m tee / It '/ do-' � „� 6Rno REwsilw 33 l Sap /VIE%: / as, ele tee 33 KFUCHURCH IF 14111 tee. ADII / GEA'EREtAYE \ tee �' FER s /' If tee— / ME, REYR K ZCf tee tee za.ro.vR FIJI Fee 011 REK�QREMER�TS aTv�gIPWG, IAMkIHG,AHOrt �`GN E%OIIC VEOvE VA HOTErtrwrt ryAT RE RJW IIWMAY ROTE GRASS PAMW ROTES FlRE ROW GLCUTATION wnR ''•�ay.ef'•�r a oo� ono N < g n lL 4 SlffSjiii�.ii. !'i @ili: j';Elee O (U9 a a A U c0 2 z O o Q o 0 u Q U ��I Y ¢ � i � o g 7 S Bf]BRI Ei SEE RAN MASTEfl SK3NAGE b STRIPING SITE PIAN zo,ra.vR CROSS-SECTION A -A ONROI CROSS-SECTION D-D N.T.S. MAW vR ` \i °N�Rct EX /FFE 7W tAVD O REWANU °EdlEgf /P°RS/c�R4W u \ USE RE�"L \ \ CROSS-SECTION 1.. ,.. --..-.r----- CROSS-SECTION B-B w,w.. o,.� CROSS-SECTION E-E N.T.S. C-C ROW RESTORATION CROSS-SECTION F-F N.T.S. IEGERD �9�e�Rna G• e.s.w. w.a. 0 a 0 O S �^R B a^ � o aLL °ER z L] O Uy��n Zj �o s �Si 'illl�I�if( ll• 0 o .. O LL LL U _ o0 �U o W oo 3 Y > o N y Z O o Q u U m � y �Ii 3 is � o y 3 �e©000 SEE PIM! 9NTER DI1W NM3 d GRNDIRO PlAll CROSS-SECTION G-G N.T.S. u r L e l � .xo�� r um REVK)E�t r=rueroleu.,.�ueuwamu p. / _ [/'I•• // d r .1 Joe �::• `:.—o�El«o bW /. / � rrEICm rII v/ ROAEUM) o cem®® gym: rre= f 0 �EMEREL\yE. \ Its \ /um ` :Mla vn \ \ [ ZC n M um IN.L p .aamawoe.r.a a z �rc LL � r�iv lL Q v m U o �• c U = o .0 W •2`w 00 3 Y N [p lv u u Z Q u 0 o ¢ O o i� � s L y S 4 a©ao© SEE PINT MASTER UTRRY PIAN� sJ NOTES: •~�•-R� TYPICAL ONSITEr4' CONCRETE SIDEWALK DETAIL Ans ro.. all �11 TYPICAL PUBLIC ROADWAY ROW PAVEMENT SECTION ME wk mow TYPICAL ONSITE PAVEMENT SECTION 1-1 iP ywuu.nT,aW %-w 14[RPERpI - r. mP, aw..P:7rRm� � y � umawrs TYPICAL PRECAST CONCRETE WHEEL STOP sroNaGE �EGENG IR ,, 8 TNflOUOM lNlE MPOW NOTE 13 DETECTABLE WARNINGS AND SIDEWALK CURB RAMP DETAIL REFERENCE STANDARD CROSSWALK DETAIL REFERENCE CURB DETAILS RARE "RE END TYPICAL GRASS PARKING SECTION COONS If ` AMA= myroffilm TYPICAL PARIONG DETAIL HANDICAP PARKING DETAIL REFERENCE: INFORM r , WAR . ff Jim ItAroo" TOO? M"Arm WFA s t.vRa�R Puvi I CI.(Af9U FLUME IALBT IIPfmJ IOIf orL O.. a 00 N n A K D lL fp O LL .pS W J U 'g 11 gl� F gS E �BDBO© SEEPWI GENEflALDETNLS I \ ( use neuoezuuL I J A�4 � I zaun-va ( 11E:aEsoEMrz� 3/o°� \\ '' ° lP ��R ckw / \ \ OfM1IFRElN! E \ (P(,&fc5o'gOw t USE REVCCIMAI orloetmm°.ur.v GRAVEL OR PAVED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE DETAIL (RUBBLE STRIP) Nit INLET PROTECTION DETAIL li starlit QYl a �D tll= Yam$ O zn Uy r11t / tip i;j J!?:Il.liil [i11 fi i• .M1iu. tt: LL O LL U = u0 - U •moo oo Z _ Q 0Nt a O � U tt �i i E °000�v SEEPWI HtOADfICUItaOLL B SNPPP EXHIBIT "B" SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR CHOKOLOSKEE CHURCH OF GOD PART OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 53 SOUTH, RANGE 23 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA VIrINITY MAD I nf-AT1nN MAP OWNER/DEVELOPER GHOKOLOSKEE CHURCH OF GOD 1230 DEMERE LN CHOKOLOSKEE, FL 34138 nlwnv��a en Iwo �Il e�,i�e�. aan nerore vo�ala�o Sunshine a .com PENINSULA ENGINEERING CIVIL ENGINEERING - LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING LAND PLANNING SITE PLANNING CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT OWNER REPRESENTATIVE CHOKOLOSKEE CHURCH OF GOD CODE MINIMUM PLANS COVER SHEETINDEX PENINSULA ENGINEERING HOKOLOSKE CHURCH OF GOD ].9'-,o'wiPE rrrc'o'suvFEa GN' Iurvo5cnPiwwNol nN. 82 Bourvo _ CHR wG ssmc FlB Ec iE MU FA55)E) CTow Y G-/� EOIBE naEGF soGF 79 ek", CODE MINIMUM s.��z LANDSCAPE PLAN cE � - vaovEaTv Bou . ' '. 30 � sourvoAar urvEG 1 N CHURCH Ce eB I o roa y gaFP �5 BUILDING CHR --/ / \ +B e( 5 CHR CE CHOKOLOSKEE CHURCH OF GOD ' ScrvE<aEn 32 I �- B - - ' 37 GNE d / _ CHR � \ -- Fourvonnory a RED EVELOPED CHU rvG E 1E —E True s BUFFER TEa`rf 1y n 1E b b �\ iE wGaes El E 49 E BUILOINC Zy/05r7 BE 31 MUC MUC rvG— ___ _ a aGOEarceourvoa¢r —Ea . eG rvGAar 0 C EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RE5IDEW —TING ASPnuTnaEh ALGrvG OEnEaE IArvE •Oa CE EkISnQERE \ROW (PUBVn NE-50 \ c acme. BUFFER D �B IBIVrcnYn SUE CHCH-001-001 P-CHCH-001-001-Li L-2 02 04 1��IIIIII �y Ir alb ',xp-R La II ,Dilly_. �Lp ��� ��� Hn'IT SHRUB AND GROUNDCOVER T6;111, MI im 10'M1t/1-3/4'r11113'ab—g.d.,prminlmum 10' M / 1-V4' 111(13" above grade) / 4'spr mi—. s vat. xerlreus pptl M1t/1-3/41 llP abovegratlel/4'zprminimum 3 SP Sabal palmetto Sabal Palm 10,13,14 Rdumrof3 Y �t 80 MUC MUM1lenber&a opillaris MUM1N Grasses 1gal./36"Oc r MbalYnep SOD r idhia xopeareaz puuitlezM1rub bWs MulA (al prppoxetl plane betlx) SII—d eural1.1 P,—.d equal "ratlius of np raper river roA arountl — vartl hII,d lowtetl in mulA beds (g appliwbk). note: See buiN ngbuntlation lantlzwpe wlrulafions forexisfingeM1urA below-atltl allowance foratltlNonal plan0ngs as neMN. BUFFER REQUIREMENTS (4.06.02) Narn, duffer Gemmerclal M existing 5. Lopez Iare 10wide (7.63' wide where noted per deviation) Type D bAw wiA trees 30' CC 205 LF / 30 a 7lrees required, 7 prwidd 5— buffer Commercial fo existing single family residential 1.5 wide Type B buffer wi+h free¢ 25' CC and single row 5' high hedge It CC 130 LF / 25 e 5 bees required, 5 tees provided 130 LF / 4 - 32 shrubs requird, 32 providd South b,FFo, Commercial +o exlsHng Demers Lcne 10' wide Type D buffer wkh tree¢ 30' CC 200 LF / 3010 trees required, 6 provided Double hdgerow where parking is visible from Demere Lane West buff - Commercial fo exieling Lopez Lane 10' wide Type D buffer wkh frees 30' CC and double raw hedge where odjacent ro parking 125 LF / 30 - 4 Hess requird, 4 provided BUILDING FOUNDATION (4.06.05.C) Prapased Church BuildIV (+/- 2,970 5F) 435+435+815+81.5 -250 LF 250 x 0.25 a 625 x 10 a 625 5F fpundol- planMng required 628 SF providd 625 SF / 300 - 2 Hess requird, 2 provided Enenryg Church Bdld'og (N-33305F) 70. 70. 60. BO e 300 LF 300 x 0.25 = 75 x 10 = 75O SF foundation pluming required 750+ 5F praNdd 750 SF / 300 e 2 frees required 2 provided CAIh. shown an Alan's 750 SF of bu Id ng foundation area - provide h,n mum 750 SF native planhngs of shrubs/groundcovers (examples Include C—plum, Dw. Yaupon Holl, Muhl, G-a.) VEHICULAR USE AREA 5,571 SF VUA (west) + 1,701 SF (east) - 7,272 SF VUA 7,= SF VUA x 10%-7r SF VUA landscape requlrcd 75G SF provided 727 5F / 250 e 3 frees required, 6 presided NAT REQUIREMENTS (4.06.05.D.1) 32 trees x 100%-ui native frees re100% 32 id a - 100% of shrubs required is be vtive, 100% previdd REQUIRED SPECIES MIX (4.06.03.D5) Tana) frees required - 32 Minimum number IF free species required e 4 PENINSULA ENGINEERING HOKOLOSKE CHURCH OF GOD CODE MINIMUM NOTES AND DETAILS CHOKOLOSKEE CHURCH OF GOD CHCH-001-001 P-CHCH-001-001-1-3 L-3 �. ��wi��Loca.�so'�c�aRECOcrN,ROLLEa Ea E. RM=. R ©® OR EOUAL oAUTOMATIC CONTROLLER "o ■ll— II�4PP''II�1 0 ■NE • _`7 OR EOUaL /1POP UP SPRAY HEAD U PENINSULA ENGINEERING HOKOLOSKE CHURCH OF GOD CODE MINIMUM IRRIGATION PLAN CHOKOLOSKEE CHURCH OF GOD CHCH-001-001 P-CHCH-001-001-I1R1 L-4