HEX Final Decision 2023-21HEX NO. 2023-21
HEARING EXAMINER DECISION
DATE OF HEARING.
June 22, 2023
PETITION.
Petition No. VA-PL20210001172 - Lots 165 and 166, Queens Park at Lago Verde Phase Two
- Request for a variance from the 20-foot minimum front yard setback for group housing as
depicted within the Queens Park Master Site Plan, pursuant to section 2.05.E of the Lago
Verde Planned Unit Development (PUD), Ordinance No. 84-81, as amended, to reduce the
minimum front yard to 10.42 feet, to allow for a garage addition that will project up to 10
feet, inclusive of a 1-foot roof overhang, into the required front yard of property located at
3631 Kent Drive and further described as Lots 165 and 166, Queens Park at Lago Verde
Phase Two, in Section 18, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida.
GENERAL PURPOSE FOR THE PETITION.
Petitioner seeks a Variance to allow for a 10-foot by 18.1-foot, inclusive of a one -foot roof
overhang, garage addition to encroach into the required 20-foot front yard setback; neither the
garage addition nor the incorporated roof overhang will encroach into the 10-foot utility easement
that is located within said front setback.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION.
Approval with conditions.
FINDINGS.
1. The Hearing Examiner has jurisdiction over this Petitioner pursuant to Sec. 2-87(2) of the
Collier County of Ordinances, Sec. 8.10.00 of the Land Development Code, and Chapter 9 of
the County Administrative Code.
2. The public hearing for this Petition was properly noticed and conducted in accordance with all
County and state requirements.
3. The public hearing was conducted electronically and in -person in accordance with
Emergency/Executive Order 2020-04.
4. The Petitioner and/or Petitioner's representative executed the Hybrid Virtual Quasi -Judicial
Public Hearing Waiver related to conducting the public hearing electronically and in -person.
5. The required Agent Letter was sent to all property owners located within 150 feet of the subject
property on or about May 15, 2023, as evidenced by an executed Affidavit of Compliance.
Notice of the Hearing Examiner meeting was provided by newspaper advertisement, mailed
Page 1 of 5
notice to owners within 500 feet of the site, and posting of a public notice sign on the site at
least 15 days prior to the hearing.
6. The County Staff presented the Petition followed by the Petitioner and/or Petitioner's
representative, public comment and then rebuttal by the Petitioner and/or Petitioner's
representative. Steve Friedman of 3615 Kent Drive was present and expressed that he has
lived in the neighborhood for thirty-two (32) years. Mr. Friedman expressed his objection to
the Petitioner's variance request and his concerns for the aesthetics of the neighborhood since
the garage addition would make Petitioner's driveway different than all the other driveways in
the neighborhood if the variance is approved. The petitioner has provided approval of their
proposed project by the HOA as well as four letters of no objection, which are included within
Exhibit D.
7. The County's Land Development Section 9.04.03 lists the criteria for variances. The Hearing
Examiner having the same authority as the Board of Zoning Appeals may grant, deny or modify
any request for a variance from the regulations or restrictions of the Collier County Land
Development Code.'
1. Are there special conditions and circumstances existing, which are peculiar to the location,
size and characteristics of the land, structure or building involved?
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the orientation of
the existing residence and the placement of mechanical equipment, a generator, and a
propane tank on the north side of the residence make it impractical to expand in any
direction other than to the west.
2. Are there special conditions and circumstances, which do not result from the action of the
applicant such as pre-existing conditions relative to the property, which are the subject of
the Variance request?
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the property fronts
on Kent Drive which comprises a 60 foot right-of-way easement. The actual roadway
occupies roughly 30 feet which results in a 15 foot± buffer on either side of the road. The
proposed garage addition would be extended up to a 10 foot utility easement which is then
25± feet from the roadway.
3. Will a literal interpretation of the provisions of this zoning code work unnecessary and
undue hardship on the applicant or create practical difficulties for the applicant?
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the applicant has
stated that provisions of this zoning would create either a hardship of irrelevant cost
increase of building to the North and/or not affording the cost increase and living with the
fact that the owners can 't fit (2) full-sized vehicles into the existing garage that are needed
for medical reasons from aging disabilities. A literal interpretation of this zoning code
'The Hearing Examiner's findings are italicized.
Page 2 of 5
presents practical difficulties for the property owner given the configuration of the existing
residence.
4. Will the Variance, if granted, be the minimum Variance that will make possible the
reasonable use of the land, building or structure and which promote standards of health,
safety, and welfare?
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the applicant's
agent contends the 10 foot garage addition, inclusive of a 1 foot roof overhang, is needed
for the property owner to have adequate space to park/store two full-size automobiles in
addition to handicap access equipment thus allowing a fully contained area.
5. Will granting the Variance confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by
these zoning regulations to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district?
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that by definition, a
Variance bestows some dimensional relief from the zoning regulations specific to a site.
LDC Section 9.04.02 allows relief through the Variance process for any dimensional
development standard. As such, other properties facing a similar hardship would be
entitled to make a similar request and would be conferred equal consideration on a case -
by -case basis.
6. Will granting the Variance be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of this Land
Development Code, and not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to
the public welfare?
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that The PUD provides
established setbacks for Single -Family and Multi -Family Residential components of the
PUD and further allows clustered buildings, with site plan approval, as per Section 2.05.E.
Said section further states property development regulations may be waived or reduced
provided a site plan is approved under this section. This development received such site
plan approval under the name of Queens Park; the most current, revised, site plan was
approved on 0813011989. The requested Variance will be in harmony with the general
intent and purpose of the PUD which has been deemed to be consistent with the Land
Development Code. However, the proposed garage addition will decrease the length of the
existing driveway which raises concerns; specifically concerning LSC Section 4.05.04.D,
which states: "Required off-street parking shall be located so that no automotive vehicle
when parked shall have any portion of such vehicle overhanging or encroaching on the
public right-of-way or the property of another. If necessary, wheel stops, or barriers may
be required in order to enforce this provision. "
7. Are there natural conditions or physically induced conditions that ameliorate the goals and
objectives of the regulation such as natural preserves, lakes, golf courses, etc.?
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the applicant's
agent has provided a letter of approval from the homeowner's association as well as
several letters of no objection from the immediate neighbors of the subject property.
Page 3 of 5
8. Will granting the Variance be consistent with the GMP?
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that approval of this
Variance will not affect or change the requirements of the GMP with respect to density,
intensity, compatibility, access/connectivity, or any other applicable provisions.
ANALYSIS.
The subject variance request for the reduction of the driveway area required for the garage addition
could perceivably pose a public safety concern with respect to off-street parking. The record
evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that if the variance is properly conditioned,
this hazard could be greatly reduced or eliminated. Furthermore, the applicant has offered a
sufficient argument to merit consideration. Said arguments include the actual distance of the
proposed structure from the paved roadway, the existing configuration of the subject residence,
the placement of mechanical equipment, a generator, and a fuel tank on the north side of the
residence, as well as the approval of the homeowner's association and letters of no objection from
neighboring property owners. The requested addition is to accommodate handicap access needs
that were unknown at the time the residence was initially constructed and that no part of the
addition, the structure or roof overhang, will encroach into the established 10-foot utility easement.
Based on a review of the record including the Petition, application, exhibits, the County's staff
report, and hearing comments and testimony from the Petitioner and/or the Petitioner's
representative(s), County staff and any given by the public, the Hearing Examiner finds that there
is enough competent, substantial evidence as applied to the criteria set forth in Section 9.04.03 of
the Land Development Code to approve the Petition with the conditions as referenced below.
DECISION.
The Hearing Examiner hereby APPROVES Petition No. VA-PL20210001172, filed by Michael
Bullard of A.C.G.C. Development Corp., representing Joseph M. and Cynthia A. Dayes, with
respect to the property described as 3631 Kent Drive and further described as Lots 165 and 166,
Queens Park at Lago Verde Phase Two, in Section 18, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier
County, Florida, for the following:
• A variance from the 20-foot minimum front yard setback for group housing as depicted
within the Queens Park Master Site Plan, pursuant to section 2.05.E of the Lago Verde
Planned Unit Development (PUD), Ordinance No. 84-81, as amended, to reduce the
minimum front yard to 10.42 feet, to allow for a garage addition that will project up to 10
feet, inclusive of a 1-foot roof overhang, into the required front yard.
Said changes are fully described in the Plot -Site Plan attached as Exhibit "A", Left Elevation -Roof
Overhang attached as Exhibit `B", and Map of Boundary Survey attached as Exhibit "C",
Evidence of HOA approval and letters of no objection attached as Exhibit "D", and are subject to
the condition(s) set forth below.
Page 4 of 5
ATTACHMENTS.
Exhibit A — Plot -Site Plan
Exhibit B — Left Elevation -Roof Overhang
Exhibit C — Map of Boundary Survey
Exhibit D —Evidence of HOA approval and letters of no objection.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION.
3631 Kent Drive and further described as Lots 165 and 166, Queens Park at Lago Verde Phase
Two, in Section 18, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida
CONDITIONS.
1. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the
development.
2. There shall be no outside parking or storage of automobiles, trucks, or other passenger type
motor vehicles within the driveway of the subject property.
DISCLAIMER.
Pursuant to Section 125.022(5) F.S., issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any
way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency
and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant
fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or
undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law.
APPEALS.
This decision becomes effective on the date it is rendered. An appeal of this decision shall be done
in accordance with applicable ordinances, codes and law.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AND EXHIBITS: SEE CLERK OF COURT, MINUTES
AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. DECISIONS OF THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR
VARIANCES, CONDITIONAL USES, AND BOAT DOCK EXTENSIONS SHALL BE
NOTED ON THE ZONING MAP FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES.
Date Andrew Dickman, Esq., AICP
Hearing Examiner
Page 5 of 5
EXHIBIT "A"
EDGE OF WATER -___
E
N FOUND"
P.C. Npp° 54' S9"�/ IRON PIPE � ti
_ CORNER 12®.PROPERY D1' NO ID. } ��to
_ - - 110' U nLITY
_ _ EASEMENT-----------------------�
POOL 4RON PIPE
j (NO ID.)
2.70' 2.30'
50.0
a z UMP
l �o Ac
Ise to I
.a tD m , �� -oo r"Lml mad
❑ a�1 zz rn oowrn--j cogo mt0
a ❑is to `I 4� r*tII N („2-'CZ7� N Nn� cc_:
�®
off N C1 � Rl ril z ❑ �!
r— LJ C7
rn C]
�1Ja O t3 I D 0 05j -0
j 11.8' 0
16.1' 22.1'
P.C. l 'I', �
FOUND �` ------ o_--
IRON PIPE
(Nth ID.)
90o° 54' 59"E
ji z 1 35.00'
Ncn �
,Qj.
�tn M d
PROPOSE .o
GARAGE iT
9' 1.
0
4 10' UTILITY
N EASEMENT
-
IRON PIPE
(NO ID.)
CA
0
" 60' DEDICATED RIGHT--OF-WAY
EXHIBIT "B"
FRONT F 9
SCALE: 1/4 = I 4' -
:�...3,�
• .0786.00MT
RIDGE
I h �� -
- , Mr.'cct� SittNGtES
FRONT
��' •_ -- - _ _� � - - --ram:-._ l
lie ROOF OVE-(Z4AN6
S'Cucco
_ - JAQME 1!
tr.tts•ret�tG PgvEt25
New MotAC)LI'CRte- I �VgiIO N
• L � �. { - - SLAB � MA'CCN E�tS't'tN6 F.32
EXt$l
GAM6F
rRePOS& D
&N-RAGE
jt e
$TAR,t OF UTILITY
EA9EMGN'T
EXHIBIT "C"
GRAPHIC SCALE
3015' 0 1
( IN FEET IN FEET )
1 INCH = 30 FT.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOTS 165 AND 165, OF "QUEENS PARK AT LAGO
VERDE. PHASE Trio", ACCORDING TO THE PLAT
THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 14, AT
PAGE 94 AND 95. OF THE PUSUC RECORDS OF
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PROPERTY ADDRESS:
FOLIO NO. 69002502107
3631 KENT DRIVE,
NAPLES, FL 34112 `q
R
AREA OF PROPERTY: 13,366 SQUARE FEET AND/OR
0.307 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
CERTIFIED TO:
TF95 BOUNDARY SURVEY HAS BEEN PREPARED FOR THE
EXCLUSIVE USE OF THE ENnTES NAME HEREON. THE
CERTIFICATIONS DO NOT EXTEND TO ANY UNNAMED
PARTIES
-DAYS, JOSEPH M& CYNTHIA A
T.) 1HE ASM CAPIICNED PROPERTY %'AS SURVEYED AND DESCRIBED BASED ON
ilE ABOVE LEGAL DESCRIPTONE PROMOM BY ❑DENT.
2) TINTS C671f.1CA7ICN IS ONLY FOR THE LANDS AS DESCRIBED, R IS NOT A
ffRTIRCATION OF m ZONING. EASEMENTS CR FREEDOM OF ENOLMDRANCES,
ABSTRACT NOT REEMEAEO.
3.) THERE MAY eE ADDITIONAL RESIPoCIIONS NOT 9-04N ON TINS BOUNDARY
9FiYE1' 17uT MAY BE FOUND N THE PLBUC RECORDS OF HIS COUNTY.
MMINATION CG ABSTRACT OF MILE VJLL HAVE TO BE MADE TO DETERMINE
RECORDED INSIRIASE1,175. IF MIT AFFECTING INS PROPERTY.
DSTAVCE
FEEL THE
1EVATTONS 94WN HEREON ARE BASED ON TO THE NORTH AMEICAN
)CAL DATUM OF ISM (N.AV.D20
ILL MEASUREMENTS ME M ANCE WTH THE UWED STATES
CARD U.S. FOOT
=TACT THE APPROPRIATE AUTHCF4TY PROR TO ANY DESIGN YORK ON
HEREIN DESCRIBED PARCEL FOR BOLDING AND ZONING INFORMATION.
UNDERGROUND UTUTI S ARE NOT DEPICTED HEREON. CONTACT THE
RCPRATE AUTHORITY PRIOR TO ANY DESIGN WORK OR CONSTRUCTION 04
PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED. SURVEYOR SHALL BE NOTIFIED AS TO ANY
AT CN FROM UMUTIES SIRDAN HEREON.
ENCLMBRANCES NOT S1OAN ON TFE PUT.
THE YANITTEN CONSENT OF LANDMARK 9 MYINC & ASSOCIATES, INC.
:AROUND FORT ONS ID' F0071M FWNDAMONS OR OTHER IMPRV,EMDJTS
NOT LOCAIED.
ONLY VSEE AND ABOVE CRCKND DNCROACTMNTS LOCATED.
VEAL TES ARE TO THE FACE OF THE WALL
FENCE OANENS IP NOT DETERMINED.
BASS OF BEARINGS REFERENCED TO UNE NOTED AS D.B.
BOIINOARRY SURVEY NUKE A DRAANC AND/OR GRAPHIC REPWS:NTAMCN
HE SUIM1 Y VODK PERSOWED IN 7 E BCD.
NO IDENTIFICATION FOUND ON PROPERTY CORKERS UNLESS NOTED
THE SOURCES OF DATA USED FOR TIE PREPARATION O INS BOUNDARY
EY IS 'QUEENS PARK AT LAW VER[ E, PNASE PHA- RECORDED IN PLAT
C 14. AT PACs 94 AND OS.
T/S MAP CIF SURVEY IS IN700M TO BE DIS'LANED AT A SCALE OF CNE
H OF BOUNDS g2,Yr 8 U I E�x
I
-I a
LOT 163 LOT 164 -1
P•B. 14 PO-95 P.B. 14 PG-95 j
1
I
I
t
10 D'- II O
„FKI��2 NB9. OS' 01AE
Q _ B5.00'
c 30
T^ rlt�j.1
OgN �p I Y 1�ba R' UNDER GROUNDTAN
-
O I~
OI S p.B.1495 I b
GENERATOR^1r I
ELEV.-B 22 I
�< I 4 p14 `I
<; I T1D T /_ p r
MEAN NIGH WA
ELEV.2.24 I DOPE STORY
(N.A.V.D.88IO2d ; I g RE♦f3S31� 13.0'ry �U f" ca
03-13-2022 /a _
N O ' 9 F.F.E. &38 a I Z l o x
EDGE OF WATER D N 13.0, )
ELEV..1.77
(N.A.V.DJ02 O - _ I ID 1
0...2.22 Z
TRACT"N-i" I DI Q❑
Z �) ND
TANUNDK ROPANE I D N
d I d I o"
LAKE L"p' I LOT 1 GIS I I1 I
N P.6. 14 PG•9 Di ..I
L--i-2—mT
-- - - -_J MANHOLE
6ITY- RIMS 5ENT
V KCz71 100.001 Ej 6g i I
6U1 ��I
LOT 167
f P.B. 14 PO-0Ei
LOCATION MAP
SOUTH, RANGE AST
SECTION 14 TOWNSHIP 50 25FAST
LYING AND BEING W NG IN COWER COUNTY FLORIDA
(NOT TO SCALE)
-
c�wvw��rrN�Nc =
- :•A
EB No. 7807
PROFE4a<AL SJM'IV S AND MAPPERS
1435 SA 871h A%OAX SU" "A-
''
MAC R. 33174
(
FlIG£ (305SY}-W02 FAIN (9a) 1^8-4=
YNxOSURLtYTNctu4
DAAL-RE045IRAS'OCW1COOM
ABBREVIATIONS AND LEGEND:
A/C -UNDIES AW CONDITONNC LINT
- - - S r. � C
_ C
D D.-DENOIES 8MI*CF BLAXINO3
<SPII.-DINDIES A�PXALT
-DDIOIES PROPLRtt LINE
D. DENOTE.-DNOTLS CONS BNCN IE O SNCCD
-CiiE LOM
MNC CIH[
CDNC. -DENOTES CONTE
LP-DNOTES LIGHT PDIE
-MNOTS CC GIDMEN
-ONDIES MCNUNNi MOPE
LY.G -DE ESTAKC h YA'NTENAXC
D.C. -DNOTES DRAWACE EAS WIT
fI
imsm NDo�'o D ,, PaC
N.L .0-5 IMMTY a 4_
P.B. -C[NOIOS PLAT DOCK
OENDiC A.
P.CP.-DENCIES PLRYANENT NNMIDL
P.O.D. -0 NE tES , OF wtmz A:C
TM-OENoTCS TMCAL
MN.W. -DENOTES NEAN Hid NATLR LINE
-.-- -moO YwD TT:NCE
•--DENOTFY — - FENCE
O-DNOTES IRON FENCE
-D.— FOUND WCN NE (NC 0.j
A-DNOIES FOUND NAi AND NSC
-DENOTIM ASPHALT PAD404T
"'xA .DWDTES EIEVATONS
-DENOTES DRICK
O .DENOTE✓ CONC!CiC PAD
ALL BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOT
HEREON ARE RECORD AND MEASURED
UNLESS OTI¢R'.MSE NOTED.
FLOOD ZONE:
AE
ELEVATION:
7.0 FEET
COMMUNITY:
120067
PANEL
12021CO601
DATE OF FIRM:
05-16-2012
y
SUFFIX:
H
�..
ORIGINAL FIELD
ai
WORKDAr VEY
03-15-2022
QBENCH
MARK:
N/A
jELEVATION:
N/A
O
SURVEYORS CER77FICA770N: I HEREBY CERTIFY TO m DATE 0 9YVAV SCALE
BEST OF NY IDNI AUM AND DELI - T THIS "MAP OF BOUNDARY SURVEY' IS
LE AND CORRECT" R'.PRESNT OF A PREPARED LNDER MT DIRECTION.
fIT MEETS THE STAND'�-'iRJACT4D; F. BY THE STATE OP 0}t}ZOZI J.FEE T'•30'
"DA BOARD OF PROF759 4w SY N,SRS"D. CHAPTER 5h17050 MROUCH O
7.C52 OF THE FLORIIMPIEVENIING LAA
,UAtT TO CHAPRR '- y a REVISION / UPDATE OF SURVEY
O) :. r.. _,. .. FOR THE FIN Q _ DATE I DESCRIP-ION
WTIRO7T AN I 1 2203.0112
BUILDING PHOTOGRAPHS OMB No. 1660-0008
ELEVATION CERTIFICATE See Instructions for Item A6, 2203,0112Ec Expiration Date: November 30, 2022
•'
FOR INSURANCE COMPANY
uilding Street Address (including Apt., Unit, Suite, and/or Bldg, No,) or -• Route and Box No.
Policy Number:
ity State ZIP Code
Company NAIC Number
APLES 34112
FLORIDA,
If using the Elevation Certificate to obtain NFIP flood insurance, affix at least 2 building photographs below according to the
instructions for Item A6. Identify all photographs with date taken; "Front View" and "Rear View"; and, if required, "Right Side View" and
"Left Side View," When applicable, photographs must show the foundation with representative examples of the flood openings or
vents, as indicated in Section AS, If submitting more photographs than will fit on this page, use the Continuation Page.
+r ,
1
log
- _-
Wig
_
l
ront View D. Date:
lot lg
elgo
leogg"L go
go
go
f
go
_
VMoog1 M
�ti
i 1
C
go
xg, go
Right Side View
Left Side View
FEMA Form 086-0-33 (12/19) Replaces all previous editions. Form Page 5 of 6
EXHIBIT
.1, CHANGM FORM
Queens Park Continnuil * v Services Associqfioa inc.
0VE S _�A `0 PROPFIRTY SERVICE-1;
I —'4q Tninlaini TrPill F., Suite 201
A S; FL. 347: 13
PHO, NE, 239-747-7?27 11-A.N. 2 31M.-19-317S
Nitrite kit'Applicant i'l-Ionjeowner Address in Queens Park: ...... . .....
Address of Applicant (ifidifferew) Date or Application: 0 27/2 2
Telephone Number - DayflineEvcniug ori\Aohil-_: 46-6 45.5.
E--1MailAdd1"2ss: andcd av s utii-) -i Com
Submit this form flor all proposed elevations (all vievvr) %:
site plans dimensions ii•otn property, lines to proposed structures. etc,) to addition, sobinissions %vill inclu
propcjsed colors. patterns. materials and all additional inibmiation necessary for ilic Board of Directors, and the COMCr COUlit'i- B'Uildi.:
Department (when involved) to ninike an informQd decision. if it][ required i;iforiwation is no, rttcei-vud with This compict.
application. the BOARD VI -ILL AUTO.MATICALL Y REJECT THL APPUCATION UNTIL ALL 1NFOiRNVTGN;
RECEIVED. All Nyork- must be cornpleved within 010, days fr(wa the approval af. the ARE' or the application !MUST
RE-SUBMITTEL., FOP,
DE-SCRiPTIONN-
I Would 1 JL.k-e +-o ex -tend: in., cia - -f, o ---o, t t i.-
p. 10 f t t w a 10 S re�. isi
nA_ iq
recen". t t 11 H t, C) ri , 1: v J=�
easements or neighbors.
The that thcv have read and understand thkappiiuvtion. Th.-% also understand that until it iitued apprOwd i
received. NO work is to be -,wrte,.!
Applicant's Signature
A
Applicant's Signature
C. ON D I I (j N S 0 F Ai Pr�. T .
1. A 11 required permits must be obui"ned and displayed by owner prior to work beginning.
2 1 lonicowner rer porisible for maintaining, and irimmingall landscaping approved by firiv ARB. Lzindscapinu m:i1,:ri:1k ma)
NOTcacrov; ch on neighboringprope�; or common arem,.
c rl:,
Antenna: NO AERIAL OR SATELUTY D13H ExCEEDING 18"sliall be pkiced or erected upon an\, lot or affixed in any
manner to the exittrior of any builclint), without \viuen approval (it- the AR13. Satellite dishes must be iiiiialled and properly
screened from street vivw.
PROPOSED STAR"" DAM unsure _at_.t,h_js -11-ime
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS:
ARB MrMBERS SIGNATCU Date 4lAPPROVLD REJECT-0 _17
AR13 MEMBERS SIG NIATU'RE E)ut,�[p, IP P, t Eli f I 1:1:.Jl,.C-M
ARB MEMBERS SIGNATURE. D_ I)ROVI-m RE.fEC-ra
50(1 A,P
April 6, 2021
C0111er County
4420 Mercantile Ave.
Naples, FL 4104
RE: Garage Construction 3631 Kent Drive
To whom it may concern:
I am Mr. Days' next door neighbor at 3635 Kent Drive and have discussed his
addition to the front of his garage. My family and I have no problems, objections, or concerns
with the construction of said addition.
You can reach me at the number listed below if you have any questions for me.
Yours truly,
r
Craig Forsyth , 239-707-2288
3635 Kent Drive
Naples, FL 34112
March 29, 2021
Collier County Government
4420 Mercantile Avenue
Naples, FL 34104
Re: Joe and Cindy Days -Renovation Consent
To Whom It May Concern:
This is to inform you that I give full consent to afl construction/renovation activities that
will occur ataG.-V Kent Drive, which is just opposite from me. The renovation of our neighbor's
garage will not affect me. I am fully aware that I might have to endure some dust and noise
issues for selected hours during the day.
!f you have any questions or concerns, you can reach me at the number listed below.
Yours truly,
E line Jeanpierre
3632 Kent Drive
Naples, FL 34112
PH: 239-272-0227
Email: ^ (=j'; cr:�.��•:��1i „ __ i
April 5, 202L
Collier County
4420 Mercantile Ave.
Naples, FL 4104
ro whom it may concern:
We reside next door, north side, to Joseph Days at 3631 Kent Drive.
VJe have discussed with Mr. Days his addition to the front of his
garage, and we have no objection to the construction.
If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at the number
below.
Yours truly,
Thomas Benjamin (239} 289-2500
Rebecca Benjamin
3629 Kent Drive
Naples, FL 34112
ti
April 4, 2021
Collier County Building Enforcement
4420 Mercantile Ave,
Naples, FL 4104
To whom it may concern:
I live at 3630 Kent Drive (directly across fhe street from 3631 Kent Qrive)0 Mr. Days has
explained to me about the extension that he would like to put on the front of his garage. • I have no
objection to the extension. It will not, in any way, shape, or form, affect or hinder me or my family.
Yours tr�(y,
Fritz iMeitelus
3630 Kent Drive
Naples, FL 34112