The URL can be used to link to this page

Agenda 06/13/2023 Item # 9B (Ordinance - To revise Immokalee Road)9.B 06/13/2023 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending the Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element and Rural Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map to revise the Immokalee Road - Estates Commercial Subdistrict to add 2.69f acres to the subdistrict; to allow 130,000 square feet of gross floor area of indoor self -storage; and to reduce commercial uses from 200,000 square feet to 100,000 square feet of gross floor area. The subject property consisting of 21.82f acres is located approximately one-half mile north of Randall Boulevard on the west side of Immokalee Road, in Section 22, Township 48 South, Range 27 East, Collier County Florida. (Companion to item 9A) [PL20220003426] OBJECTIVE: To have the Board of County Commissioners (Board) approve (adopt) the proposed small-scale amendment to the Growth Management Plan (GMP) and approve said amendment for transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. CONSIDERATIONS: The petition seeks to amend the Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP), specifically to expand the existing Immokalee Road -Estates Commercial Subdistrict by f2.69 acres (from f 19.13 acres to ±21.82 acres), by adding the parcel that fronts on Immokalee Road immediately to the north of the site, and to update the allowed commercial intensity to treat gross commercial floor area separate from the indoor self -storage floor area, decreasing the commercial area from 200,000 square feet to 100,000 square feet of commercial area and adding 130,000 square feet of indoor self -storage area. The result is a request to increase the commercial area by 30,000 square feet. The existing Immokalee Road - Estates Commercial Subdistrict (established by Ordinance 2021-19) comprises f 19.13 acres and is located between 4th Street NE and Immokalee Road, immediately west of Orange Tree Boulevard. The subject property lies within the Rural Estates Planning Community, in Section 22, Township 48 South, Range 27 East. Per Chapter 163.3187, Part II, Florida Statutes, limitations are in place for this type of small-scale amendment, as identified below, followed by staff comments [italicized in brackets]. Process for adoption of the small-scale comprehensive plan amendment. (1) A small-scale development amendment may be adopted under the following conditions: a) The proposed amendment involves a use of 50 acres or fewer. [The amendment pertains to a property consisting of f2.69 acres and the addition brings the existing subdistrict to a total of ±21.89 acres.] b) The proposed amendment does not involve a text change to the goals, policies, and objectives of the local government's comprehensive plan, but only proposes a land use change to the future land use map for a site -specific small-scale development activity. However, text changes that relate directly to, and are adopted simultaneously with the small-scale future land use map amendment shall be permissible under this section. [This is a site -specific text and map amendment] c) The property that is the subject of the proposed amendment is not located within an area of critical state concern unless the project subject to the proposed amendment involves the construction of affordable housing units meeting the criteria of § 420.0004 (3) and is located within an area of critical state concern designated by § 380.0552 or by the Administration Commission pursuant to § 380.05 (1). [The subject property is not within an Area of Critical State Concern.] d) Comprehensive plans may only be amended in such a way as to preserve the internal consistency of the plan pursuant to § 163.3177. [The amendment preserves the internal consistency between and among GMP elements.] FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: Based on a review of this petition, including the supporting data and analysis, staff makes the following findings and conclusions. Additional information and analysis are provided in Packet Pg. 142 9.B 06/13/2023 the Staff Report to the CCPC. • The Immokalee Road - Estates Commercial Subdistrict petition proposes a small-scale Growth Management Plan amendment to expand the subdistrict by ::L2.69 acres and to update the allowable commercial intensity to treat gross commercial floor area separate from the indoor self -storage floor area. The result increases the commercial area by 30,000 square feet. • Comprehensive Planning staff concurs with Zoning staff s finding that the 15-foot-wide Type B Landscape Buffer abutting Estates properties on 4th Avenue NE do not provide adequate separation between the existing residential properties and commercial uses. Suggested language regarding the enhanced buffer can be found in the Staff Recommendation section of this report. • There are no adverse environmental impacts as a result of this petition. • No historic or archaeological sites are affected by this amendment. • There are no transportation or public utility -related concerns as a result of this petition. • There are no concerns about impacts on other public infrastructure. • The expansion of the subdistrict has no impact on previously approved uses or commercial intensity of the site. FISCAL IMPACT: The County collects impact fees prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy to help offset the impacts of each new development on public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund projects identified in the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan as needed to maintain the adopted Level of Service (LOS) for public facilities. Other fees collected prior to the issuance of a building permit include building permit review fees. Please note that impact fees and taxes collected were not included in the criteria used by staff and the CCPC to analyze this petition. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Adoption of the proposed amendment by the Board and its transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity will commence the Department's (30) thirty -day challenge period for any affected person. Provided the small-scale amendment is not challenged, it becomes effective (31) thirty-one days after Board adoption. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This Growth Management Plan (GMP) amendment is authorized by, and subject to the procedures established in, Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes, The Community Planning Act, and by Collier County Resolution No. 12-234, as amended. The Board should consider the following criteria in making its decision: "plan amendments shall be based on relevant and appropriate data and an analysis by the local government that may include but not be limited to, surveys, studies, community goals and vision, and other data available at the time of adoption of the plan amendment. To be based on data means to react to it in an appropriate way and to the extent necessary indicated by the data available on that particular subject at the time of adoption of the plan or plan amendment at issue." § 163.3177(1)(f), F.S. In addition, § 163.3177(6)(a)2, F.S. provides that FLUE plan amendments shall be based on surveys, studies, and data regarding the area, as applicable including: a. The amount of land required to accommodate anticipated growth. b. The projected permanent and seasonal population of the area. c. The character of undeveloped land. d. The availability of water supplies, public facilities, and services. e. The need for redevelopment, including the renewal of blighted areas and the elimination of f. non -conforming uses which are inconsistent with the character of the community. g. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to or closely proximate to military installations. h. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to an airport as defined in § 330.35 and consistent with § 333.02. i. The need to modify land uses and development patterns with antiquated subdivisions. j. The discouragement of urban sprawl. k. The need for job creation, capital investment, and economic development that will strengthen and diversify the community's economy. This item is approved as to form and legality. It requires an affirmative vote of four for approval because this is an Packet Pg. 143 06/13/2023 9.B Adoption hearing of the GMP amendment. [HFAC] STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION: To forward petition PL20220003426 Immokalee Road - Estates Commercial Subdistrict GMPA to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation to approve and adopt and transmit to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity and other statutorily required agencies with the following recommended modification to the subdistrict text -to provide for an enhanced buffer along a portion of the western property line -as depicted below: "g. The Type B Landscape Buffer along a portion of the western property line shown on the PUD Master Plan shall be enhanced in accordance with the CPUD provisions." COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPC) RECOMMENDATION: The CCPC heard this petition at their May 4, 2023, meeting. There were two registered speakers in opposition to the project. One speaker suggested extending the enhanced buffer the entire length of the western property line. The Planning Commission voted 4/0 to forward the subject petition to the Board with a recommendation to approve for transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity and other statutorily required agencies, subject to staff's condition of approval regarding the enhanced buffer. RECOMMENDATION: To adopt and transmit petition PL20220001012 to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity and other statutorily required agencies, subject to staff's recommendation and as recommended by the CCPC. The attached Ordinance (Attachment A) includes the CCPC-recommended language regarding the enhanced buffer; however, the applicant has identified this as an "agree -to -disagree" item. Should the Board choose to adopt the Ordinance without the suggested language, said language will be removed from the subdistrict text. Prepared by: Rachel Hansen, Planner III, Zoning Division, GMCD ATTACHMENT(S) 1. CCPC Staff Report - Immokalee Rd Estates Commercial (PDF) 2. Attachment A - Ordinance 050823 (PDF) 3. Attachment B - NIM Materials (PDF) 4. [Linked] Attachment C - CCPC backup (PDF) 5. Attachment D - Sign Posting (PDF) 6. legal ad - agenda IDs 25462 & 25468 (PDF) Packet Pg. 144 9.B 06/13/2023 COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners Item Number: 9.B Doc ID: 25468 Item Summary: Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending the Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub - Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element and Rural Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map to revise the Immokalee Road - Estates Commercial Subdistrict to add 2.69f acres to the subdistrict; to allow 130,000 square feet of gross floor area of indoor self -storage; and to reduce commercial uses from 200,000 square feet to 100,000 square feet of gross floor area. The subject property consisting of 21.82f acres is located approximately one-half mile north of Randall Boulevard on the west side of Immokalee Road, in Section 22, Township 48 South, Range 27 East, Collier County Florida. (Companion to item 9A) [PL20220003426] Meeting Date: 06/13/2023 Prepared by: Title: — Zoning Name: Rachel Hansen 05/09/2023 4:18 PM Submitted by: Title: Zoning Director — Zoning Name: Mike Bost 05/09/2023 4:18 PM Approved By: Review: Zoning Mike Bosi Division Director Zoning James Sabo Additional Reviewer Growth Management and Community Development Department Diane Lynch Growth Management and Community Development Department James C French County Attorney's Office Heidi Ashton-Cicko Level 2 Attorney of Record Review Office of Management and Budget County Attorney's Office Office of Management and Budget County Manager's Office Board of County Commissioners Debra Windsor Level 3 OMB Gatekeeper Review Jeffrey A. Klatzkow Level 3 County Attorney's Office Review Laura Zautcke Additional Reviewer Amy Patterson Level 4 County Manager Review Geoffrey Willig Meeting Pending Completed 05/15/2023 11:30 AM Completed 05/15/2023 5:16 PM Growth Management DepartmentCompleted 05/17/2023 2:16 PM Growth Management Completed 05/26/2023 4:34 PM Completed 05/31/2023 10:04 AM Completed 05/31/2023 10:14 AM Completed 05/31/2023 1:54 PM Completed 06/04/2023 4:09 PM Completed 06/07/2023 11:41 AM 06/13/2023 9:00 AM Packet Pg. 145 9.B.1 PL20220003426 7�3e,- Coiii-t.ty STAFF REPORT COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT, ZONING DIVISION, COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING SECTION HEARING DATE: MAY 4, 2023 SUBJECT: PL20220003426 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT (GMPA); IMMOKALEE ROAD — ESTATES COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT (ADOPTION HEARING) COMPANION TO: PL20220003428 BCHD I COMMERCIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (CPUD) ELEMENTS: RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SUB -ELEMENT OF THE GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN (GGAMP) AGENT/APPLICANT: Agents: Christopher Scott, AICP Noel J. Davies, Attorney Peninsula Engineering, Inc. Davies Duke, PLLC 2600 Golden Gate Parkway 2375 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 306 Naples, FL 34105 Naples, FL 34103 Owner: BCHD Partners I, LLC 2600 Golden Gate Parkway Naples, FL 34105 GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The existing Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict (established by Ordinance 2021- 19) comprises ±19.13 acres and is located between 4th Street NE and Immokalee Road, immediately west of Orange Tree Boulevard. The proposed ±2.69-acre addition directly abuts the northern boundary of the existing subdistrict. The subject property lies within the Rural Estates Planning Community, in Section 22, Township 48 South, Range 27 East. Packet Pg. 146 Pr ti r volm � HCHD ICF'11ll� bje Property Ora yeuee BLVD IF RANDAL, CURVE MP EY" 1 ORANGETREE 1 � �✓_s� \r-71 (rrOVf'D(i IOU 9.B.1 PL20220003426 REQUESTED ACTION: The applicant proposes a small-scale Comprehensive Plan amendment to the Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP), specifically to expand the Immokalee Road -Estates Commercial Subdistrict by ±2.69 acres (from ±19.13 acres to ±21.82 acres), by adding the parcel that fronts on Immokalee Road immediately to the north of the site, and to update the allowed commercial intensity to treat gross commercial floor area separate from indoor self -storage floor area. The applicant also proposes to amend the Rural Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map (FLUM) and the Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict Map in the FLUM series of the GGAMP. The proposed Growth Management Plan (GMP) amendment is attached as Exhibit "A". PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: To expand the Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict by re -designating ±2.69 acres from the Residential Estates Subdistrict, and to revise the Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict text to update the acreage and allowed commercial intensity treating gross commercial floor area separate from indoor self -storage floor area, decreasing the commercial area from 200,000 square feet to 100,000 square feet of commercial area and adding 130,000 square feet of indoor self -storage area. A companion petition (PL20210003321) would rezone the ±2.69-acre Estates (E) zoned parcel and add it to the BCHD I Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD). EXISTING CONDITIONS: Subject Property: The Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict is an existing ±19.13-acre subdistrict within the Rural Sub -Element of the Golden Gate Area Master plan and is currently undeveloped. The subject ±2.69-acre addition is an undeveloped Estates zoned lot and designated Estates Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict as identified on the Rural Golden Gate Estates FLUM. Surroundina Lands: North: Future Land Use Designation; Residential Estates Subdistrict. Zoned; Estates. Land Use; undeveloped lot. East: Future Land Use Designation; Rural Settlement Area District. Zoned; Orange Tree PUD. Land Use; Single -Family Residential (across Immokalee Road). South: Future Land Use Designation; Immokalee Road/4t" Street NE Subdistrict. Zoned; Randall Curve MPUD. Land Use; undeveloped/currently under construction (maximum of 400 residential dwelling units and 150,000 square feet of commercial area). West: Future Land Use Designation; Residential Estates Subdistrict. Zoned; Estates. Land Use; Single -Family Residential. In summary, the existing land uses in the surrounding area are primarily residential, with a large- scale mixed -use development under construction within the Randall Curve MPUD. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS: Background and Considerations: The Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict and companion BCHD I CPUD were established by Ordinance 2021-19 and 2021-20, respectively. The purpose of the subdistrict is to provide a variety of commercial uses, including all permitted and conditional uses of the C-1 Packet Pg. 148 9.B.1 PL20220003426 through C-3 zoning districts, carwashes, medical and dental laboratories, nursing and professional care facilities, and air-conditioned mini- and self -storage. The proposed ±2.69-acre addition to the subdistrict is currently designated Estates Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict within the Rural Sub -Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP). This designation is characterized by low density, semi -rural residential lots with limited opportunities for other land uses. Locational criteria limiting commercial and conditional use development in the Estates designation were established with the adoption of the GGAMP in the Growth Management Plan in 1991. The recent GGAMP restudy was conducted at a high level, viewing large areas and major issues, and created the Rural, Urban, and Golden Gate City Sub -Elements of the GGAMP. Restudy -based GMP amendments were adopted in 2019 and did not change the future land use designation of the subject property. The primary purpose of the subdistrict expansion is to meet preserve requirements on the site and to allow for the reconfiguration of the site plan's commercial area. As shown on the proposed Master Plan (see companion PUDR petition for the full Master Plan), a majority of the additional acreage will be preserve area. Text changes to the existing subdistrict are limited to updating the total acreage and allowed commercial intensity treating gross commercial floor area separate from indoor self -storage floor area, decreasing the commercial area from 200,000 square feet to 100,000 square feet of commercial area and adding 130,000 square feet of indoor self -storage area. The change to commercial square footage has no effective impact on the overall commercial intensity of the subdistrict that was approved previously. Compatibility: The specific compatibility review is deferred to Zoning Services Section staff as part of the detailed review of the companion PUD rezone petition where specific compatibility measures are appropriately considered. However, Comprehensive Planning staff concurs with Zoning staff's finding that the 15-foot wide Type B Landscape Buffer abutting Estates properties on 41" Avenue NE does not provide adequate separation from the existing residential properties and commercial uses. Staff -suggested language regarding the enhanced buffer can be found in the Staff Recommendation section of this report. CRITERIA FOR GMP AMENDMENTS FLORIDA STATUTES: Data and analysis requirements for comprehensive plans and plan amendments are noted in Chapter 163, F.S., specifically as listed below. Section 163.3177(1)(f), Florida Statutes: (f) All mandatory and optional elements of the comprehensive plan and plan amendments shall be based upon relevant and appropriate data and an analysis by the local government that may include, but not be limited to, surveys, studies, community goals and vision, and other data available at the time of adoption of the comprehensive plan or plan amendment. To be based on data means to react to it in an appropriate way and to the extent necessary indicated by the data available on that particular subject at the time of adoption of the plan or plan amendment at issue. Surveys, studies, and data utilized in the preparation of the comprehensive plan may not be deemed a part of the comprehensive plan unless adopted as a part of it. Copies of such studies, surveys, data, and supporting documents for proposed plans and plan amendments shall be made available for public inspection, and copies of such plans shall be made available to the public upon payment of reasonable charges for reproduction. Support data or summaries are not subject to the compliance review process, but the comprehensive plan must be clearly based on appropriate data. Support data or summaries may be used to aid in the determination of compliance and consistency. 2. Data must be taken from professionally accepted sources. The application of a methodology utilized in data collection or whether a particular methodology is 4 Packet Pg. 149 9.B.1 PL20220003426 professionally accepted may be evaluated. However, the evaluation may not include whether one accepted methodology is better than another. Original data collection by local governments is not required. However, local governments may use original data so long as methodologies are professionally accepted. 3. The comprehensive plan shall be based upon permanent and seasonal population estimates and projections, which shall either be those published by the Office of Economic and Demographic Research or generated by the local government based upon a professionally acceptable methodology. The plan must be based on at least the minimum amount of land required to accommodate the medium projections as published by the Office of Economic and Demographic Research for at least a 10-year planning period unless otherwise limited under s. 380.05, including related rules of the Administration Commission. Absent physical limitations on population growth, population projections for each municipality, and the unincorporated area within a county must, at a minimum, be reflective of each area's proportional share of the total county population and the total county population growth. Section 163.3177(6)(a)2. Florida Statutes: 2. The future land use plan and plan amendments shall be based upon surveys, studies, and data regarding the area, as applicable, including: a. The amount of land required to accommodate anticipated growth. b. The projected permanent and seasonal population of the area. c. The character of undeveloped land. d. The availability of water supplies, public facilities, and services. e. The need for redevelopment, including the renewal of blighted areas and the elimination of nonconforming uses which are inconsistent with the character of the community. f. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to or closely proximate to military installations. g. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to an airport as defined in s. 330.35 and consistent with s. 333.02. h. The discouragement of urban sprawl. i. The need for job creation, capital investment, and economic development that will strengthen and diversify the community's economy. j. The need to modify land uses and development patterns within antiquated subdivisions. Section 163.3177(6)(a)8. Florida Statutes: (a) A future land use plan element designating proposed future general distribution, location, and extent of the uses of land for residential uses, commercial uses, industry, agriculture, recreation, conservation, education, public facilities, and other categories of the public and private uses of land. The approximate acreage and the general range of density or intensity of use shall be provided for the gross land area included in each existing land use category. The element shall establish the long-term end toward which land use programs and activities are ultimately directed. 8. Future land use map amendments shall be based upon the following analyses: a. An analysis of the availability of facilities and services. Packet Pg. 150 9.B.1 PL20220003426 b. An analysis of the suitability of the plan amendment for its proposed use considering the character of the undeveloped land, soils, topography, natural resources, and historic resources on site. c. An analysis of the minimum amount of land needed to achieve the goals and requirements of this section. The petitioner must provide appropriate and relevant data and analysis to address the statutory requirements for a Plan Amendment. For this petition, a narrative justification (Exhibit V.D.1 "Project Narrative, Criteria and Consistency") was provided by the applicant. Section 163.3187 Florida Statutes: Process for adoption of small scale comprehensive plan amendment. (1) A small scale development amendment may be adopted under the following conditions: (a) The proposed amendment involves a use of 50 acres or fewer. [The subject site comprises ±2.69 acres and the addition brings the existing subdistrict to a total of ±21.89 acres.] (b) The proposed amendment does not involve a text change to the goals, policies, and objectives of the local government's comprehensive plan, but only proposes a land use change to the future land use map for a site -specific small-scale development activity. However, text changes that relate directly to, and are adopted simultaneously with, the small- scale future land use map amendment shall be permissible under this section. [This amendment does include a text change to the Comprehensive Plan and those text changes are directly related to the proposed future land use map amendment.] (c) The property that is the subject of the proposed amendment is not located within an area of critical state concern, unless the project subject to the proposed amendment involves the construction of affordable housing units meeting the criteria of s. 420.0004(3), and is located within an area of critical state concern designated by s. 380.0552 or by the Administration Commission pursuant to s. 380.05(1). [The subject property is not located within an Area of Critical State Concern.] (4) Comprehensive plans may only be amended in such a way as to preserve the internal consistency of the plan pursuant to s. 163.3177. Corrections, updates, or modifications of current costs which were set out as part of the comprehensive plan shall not, for the purposes of this act, be deemed to be amendments. [This amendment preserves the internal consistency of the plan and is not a correction, update, or modification of current costs which were set out as part of the comprehensive plan.] NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM) NOTES: The applicant conducted a NIM on January 26, 2023 at the OF/IFAS Extension located at 14700 Immokalee Road in Naples. The meeting commenced at approximately 5:30 p.m. and approximately 20 people were in attendance. Christopher Scott, AICP, the agent, gave a brief presentation in which he explained the request for the proposed rezone and the companion small scale Growth Management Plan amendment. The following comments/questions were raised by members of the public in attendance: suggestions to add additional buffering to the adjacent Estates lots, questions about the proposed self -storage facility (currently in SDP phase) and other future commercial development within the PUD, general comments about the traffic in the Immokalee/Randall area. The NIM summary, PowerPoint presentation, and sign -in sheet are included in the CCPC backup materials. Packet Pg. 151 9.B.1 PL20220003426 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: • The Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict petition proposes a small-scale Growth Management Plan amendment to expand the subdistrict by ±2.69 and to update the allowed commercial intensity to treat gross commercial floor area separate from indoor self -storage floor area. • There are no adverse environmental impacts as a result of this petition. • No historic or archaeological sites are affected by this amendment. • There are no public utility -related concerns as a result of this petition. • There are no concerns about impacts on other public infrastructure. • The expansion of the subdistrict has no impact on previously approved uses or commercial intensity of the site. Environmental Findings: Environmental review staff has found this project to be consistent with the Conservation & Coastal Management Element (CCME). The project site consists of approximately 21.70 acres of native vegetation. A minimum of 3.26 acres (15%) of native vegetation is required to be preserved. This project does not require Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. Environmental Services staff recommends approval of the proposed petition. LEGAL REVIEW: The County Attorney's office reviewed the staff report on April 5, 2023. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Collier County Planning Commission forward petition PL20220003426 Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict GMPA to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation to approve and adopt and transmit to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity and other statutorily required agencies with the following modifications —to provide for an enhanced buffer along a portion of the western property line —as depicted below: [Note: Words underlined are added, words StF Gk through are deleted — as proposed by petitioner; words double underlined are added, words are deleted — as proposed by staff.] 1. ESTATES DESIGNATION *** *** *** *** *** *** *** TEXT BREAK *** *** *** *** *** *** B. Estates — Commercial District *** *** *** *** *** *** *** TEXT BREAK *** *** *** *** *** *** 3. IMMOKALEE ROAD -ESTATES COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT [Page 22] This Subdistrict is approximately ± 21.82 acres in size and is located on the west side of Immokalee Road, north of Randall Boulevard and south of Oil Well Road, as depicted on the Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict Map. The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide a variety of commercial land uses. Development within the Subdistrict shall be subject to the following: Packet Pg. 152 9.B.1 PL20220003426 a. All development within this Subdistrict shall be rezoned to a Planned Unit Development (PUD). b. The rezone Ordinance must include standards for a common architectural theme as well as development standards and buffers to insure compatibility with surrounding properties. c. Allowable uses shall be limited to those: Uses permitted by right and by conditional use in the C-3, Commercial Intermediate zoning district, as listed in the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance No. 04-41. 2. Motor freight transportation and warehousing (SIC 4225, air-conditioned mini- and self -storage warehousing only); 3. Cawwashes provided that carwashes abutting residential zoning districts shall be subject to section 5.05.11 of this code, SIC 7542; 4. Medical and dental laboratories, SIC 8071, 8072; 5. Nursing and professional care facilities, SIC 8051, 8052, 8059; The rezone Ordinance shall limit these uses further to insure compatibility with surrounding properties. d. Development is limited to a maximum intensity of 200,000 100,000 square feet of gross floor area and 130,000 square feet of indoor self -storage floor area. e. The westerly portion of this subdistrict (a.k.a. north 180 ft. of Tract 116, GGE Unit 22), which is the single western parcel immediately abutting 4th Street NE (the "Western Parcel"), shall be utilized for native preservation, stormwater management or buffer areas only. It shall not be utilized for any type of access from 4th St. NE to/from the commercial uses within the CPUD; however, the adjacent single-family homeowner to the north (a.k.a. the south half of Tract 115, Golden Gate Estates Unit 22 subdivision) may establish a driveway for the sole benefit and exclusive use of that homeowner's residential property. f. Interconnection shall be provided with properties fronting Immokalee Road located immediately to the north and south. g. The Type B Landscape Buffer along the western property line shown on the PUD Master Plan shall be enhanced in accordance with the CPUD provisions. NOTE: This petition has been tentatively scheduled for the June 13, 2023 BCC meeting. Packet Pg. 153 9.B.2 ORDINANCE NO. 2023- AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO.89- 05, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SUB -ELEMENT OF THE GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN ELEMENT AND RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND MAP SERIES TO REVISE THE IMMOKALEE ROAD — ESTATES COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT TO ADD 2.69t ACRES TO THE SUBDISTRICT; TO ALLOW 130,000 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF INDOOR SELF STORAGE; AND TO REDUCE COMMERCIAL USES FROM 200,000 SQUARE FEET TO 100,000 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR AREA ON PROPERTY CONSISTING OF 21.82f ACRES; AND FURTHERMORE, DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE ADOPTED AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED APPROXIMATELY ONE-HALF MILE NORTH OF RANDALL BOULEVARD ON THE WEST SIDE OF IMMOKALEE ROAD, IN SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. [PL20220003426] WHEREAS, Collier County, pursuant to Section 163.3161, et. seq., Florida Statutes, the Florida Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, was required to prepare and adopt a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners adopted the Collier County Growth Management Plan on January 10, 1989; and WHEREAS, the Community Planning Act of 2011 provides authority for local governments to amend their respective comprehensive plans and outlines certain procedures to amend adopted comprehensive plans; and WHEREAS, BCHD Partners I, LLC, requested an amendment to the Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub -element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element and Urban Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map and Map Series to revise the Immokalee Road -Estates Commercial Subdistrict; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Subsection 163.3187(1), Florida Statutes, this amendment is considered a Small -Scale Amendment; and WHEREAS, the Subdistrict property is not located in an area of critical state concern or a rural area of opportunity; and [22-CMP-01135/1790560/1] 89 1 of Immokalee Road -Estates Commercial Subdistrict 5-8-23 Packet Pg. 154 WHEREAS, the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) on considered the proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan and recommended approval of said amendment to the Board of County Commissioners; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County did take action in the manner prescribed by law and held public hearings concerning the proposed adoption of the amendment to the Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub -element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element and Urban Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map and Map Series of the Growth Management Plan on ; and WHEREAS, all applicable substantive and procedural requirements of law have been met NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: ADOPTION OF AMENDMENT TO THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN The Board of County Commissioners hereby adopts this small-scale amendment to the Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub -element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element and Urban Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map and Map, in accordance with Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes. The text and map amendment are attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION TWO: SEVERABILITY. If any phrase or portion of this Ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion. SECTION THREE: EFFECTIVE DATE. The effective date of this plan amendment, if the amendment is not timely challenged, shall be 31 days after Board approval. If timely challenged, this amendment shall become effective on the date the state land planning agency or the Administration Commission enters a final order determining this adopted amendment to be in compliance. No development orders, development permits, or land uses dependent on this amendment may be issued before it has become effective. [22-CMP-01135/1790560/1] 89 2 of 3 Immokalee Road -Estates Commercial Subdistrict 5-8-23 Packet Pg. 155 9.B.2 PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida this day of , 2023. ATTEST: CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legality: Heidi Ashton-Cicko, Managing Assistant County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Rick LoCastro, Chairman Attachment: Exhibit A — Proposed Text Amendment & Map Amendment [22-CMP-0113 5/1790560/ 1189 Immokalee Road -Estates Commercial Subdistrict 5-8-23 Packet Pg. 156 May 8, 2023 9.B.2 PL20220003426 EXHIBIT A GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SUB -ELEMENT *** *** *** *** *** *** *** TEXT BREAK *** *** *** *** *** *** 1. ESTATES DESIGNATION *** *** *** *** *** *** *** TEXT BREAK *** *** *** *** *** *** B. Estates — Commercial District *** *** *** *** *** *** *** TEXT BREAK *** *** *** *** *** *** 3. IMMOKALEE ROAD -ESTATES COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT [Page 22] This Subdistrict is approximately 19.13* 21.82 acres in size and is located on the west side of Immokalee Road, north of Randall Boulevard and south of Oil Well Road, as depicted on the Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict Map. The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide a variety of commercial land uses. Development within the Subdistrict shall be subject to the following: a. All development within this Subdistrict shall be rezoned to a Planned Unit Development (PUD). b. The rezone Ordinance must include standards for a common architectural theme as well as development standards and buffers to insure compatibility with surrounding properties. c. Allowable uses shall be limited to those: 1. Uses permitted by right and by conditional use in the C-3, Commercial Intermediate zoning district, as listed in the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance No. 04-41. 2. Motor freight transportation and warehousing (SIC 4225, air-conditioned mini - and self -storage warehousing only); 3. Carwashes provided that carwashes abutting residential zoning districts shall be subject to section 5.05.11 of this code, SIC 7542; 4. Medical and dental laboratories, SIC 8071, 8072; 5. Nursing and professional care facilities, SIC 8051, 8052, 8059; The rezone Ordinance shall limit these uses further to insure compatibility with surrounding properties. d. Development is limited to a maximum intensity of 200,000 100,000 square feet of gross floor area and 130,000 square feet of indoor self -storage floor area. Page 1 of 4 Words underlined are added; words StFUGk threugI4 are deletions Packet Pg. 157 May 8, 2023 9.B.2 PL20220003426 e. The westerly portion of this subdistrict (a.k.a. north 180 ft. of Tract 116, GGE Unit 22), which is the single western parcel immediately abutting 4th Street NE (the "Western Parcel"), shall be utilized for native preservation, stormwater management or buffer areas only. It shall not be utilized for any type of access from 4th St. NE to/from the commercial uses within the CPUD; however, the adjacent single-family homeowner to the north (a.k.a. the south half of Tract 115, Golden Gate Estates Unit 22 subdivision) may establish a driveway for the sole benefit and exclusive use of that homeowner's residential property. f. Interconnection shall be provided with properties fronting Immokalee Road located immediately to the north and south. g. The Type B Landscape Buffer along a portion of the western property line shown on the PUD Master Plan shall be enhanced in accordance with the CPUD provisions. Words underlined are added; words stFuGk thmug4 are deletions Page 2 of 4 Packet Pg. 158 9.B.2 May 8, 2023 PL20220003426 EXHIBIT "A' PETITION PL20220003426 �nGR .�GL a E'� RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES QFUTURE LAND USE MAP c ' •-'+•.•vv-�.•'N•w.i IMMORALEE RD a — (n •ci d Immokalee Road -Estates Commercial Subdistrict E C U y � w OR WELL RO W N w � lJJ < m RANDALL BLVD E F IMMOKALEE RD o O O 0 4% VAND RBILT VAN E ILT BEACH RE y. Y 2 p Oa GOLDEN GATE BLVD GOLDEN GATE BLVD E m E rc ]RDRD, GE N Z� GREEN BLVD m P 0 Q 3 _ 4 N N Q. PNWV N J a INTERSTATE 76 INTERSTATE 75 Q Q DAVIS BLVD N SR, N 00 � RATTLE E MMOOK RD M N RURAL GOLDEN GATE/ FUTURE 11R0 USE O OPTEO BEPTEMtl � MOO �/ Q a 0 06 1 2 3 / r Miles/. i/7/ i /,:? i wm E R26E R27E R28E R29E r a� Q Page 3 of 4 Words underlined are added; words stFUsk through are deletions Packet Pg. 159 May 8, 2023 9.B.2 PL20220003426 DRAFT EXHIBIT A PL20220003421 Words underlined are added; words struck through are deletions Page 4 of 4 Packet Pg. 160 9.113.3 PENINSULAtj ENGINEERING Memorandum Date: February 3, 2023 To: Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA, CSM From: Christopher Scott, AICP RE: Immokalee Road -Estates Commercial Subdistrict GMPA/BCHD I PUDR (PL20220003426/PL20220003428) A Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) was conducted for the above referenced project on Thursday, January 26, 2023 at 5:30 pm at the OF/IFAS Extension, located at 14700 Immokalee Road. Approximately 20 individuals from the public attended the meeting (see attached sign -in sheet). The meeting was simultaneously conducted through Zoom. Individuals associated with the project team that were in attendance included the following: • Christopher Scott, Peninsula Engineering • Noel J. Davies, Davies Duke, PLLC • Eric Mallory, Metro Commercial Chris Scott opened the meeting at 5:38 pm and provided a PowerPoint presentation outlining the details of the proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment and Planned Unit Development Rezoning. Following the presentation, the meeting was opened to attendees for comments and questions. The following is a summary of the questions asked, and comments made, by the attendees and responses given by the project team. Question/Comment: (John Pelletier, 2961 4th St NE). It's great to see this many people here for this meeting; two years ago there were only three people. Couple things ... what was meant by "fewer trips?" Response: The original PUD was approved for 200,000 sf of commercial floor area. When a PUD application is submitted they are required to submit a traffic study to analyze how many trips would be created. The approved TIS with this PUD used 200,000 sf of a commercial shopping center to determine how many trips would be generated. We're now revising the PUD from 200,000 sf of total commercial floor area to specify 130,000 sf of indoor self -storage floor area, which is already a permitted use, and 100,000 sf of other commercial floor area. Since the storage use is such a low traffic generator, the proposed amendment will result in fewer trips than what was originally approved. We're not proposing to change the trip cap that was established as part of the approved PUD. PL20220003426/PL20220003428 BCHD I PUDR NIM Summary Page 1 2600 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, Florida, 34105 Office 239.403.6700 Fax 239.261.1797 Fla Engineer CA 28275 Fla Landscape CA LC26000632 Fla Surveyor/Mapper LB8479 packet Pg. 161 9.B.3 PENINSULAt� ENGINEERING My only request, is that if you have to redo this Master Concept Plan, is that you provide more buffering where it is adjacent to the Estates lot. I know it says Type B, but I would recommend adding some three palms between the trees and hedge that are required. The 47-acres has four-story apartment buildings going in and I just wanted something so I wasn't looking directly at them. There is a Site Development Plan application already in for the self -storage. We are not proposing any changes to the buffers as part of this application. The Collier County LDC requires a Type B buffer, which is one of the more intense buffers in this location. This buffer is 15-feet wide and includes a five foot hedge with trees spaced 25 feet on center. For clarification, the four-story apartments are part of the development to the south known as Randall Curve MPUD. Question/Comment: (Freddie Brantley, 3357 Mystic River Dr) Are the four-story apartments three stories over parking or four living floors? Response: (Chris Scott) My understanding is that is four living floors, but that is a separate project. Question/Comment: (Chad Everett) I have a couple questions. I know you say this is two separate developments, but we consider this all one project. First of all, are there two storage facilities planned or just one? This extra land, we call it "creep." It keeps creeping north. What is that road that goes to the north? Are you going to provide another road coming in and off of Immokalee Road? Response: (Chris Scott) I'm only aware of the self -storage facility within this (BCHD) development. In regards to the arrow on the Master Concept Plan, that points to the north. Collier County's Growth Management Plan required interconnection to adjacent properties, even if they aren't developed just to minimize the number of curb cuts going onto arterial roadways. This amendment continues to allow for that interconnection; it won't be made unless something to the north develops and wants to connect. Question/Comment: (Chad Everett) What is so important about adding these 2 additional acres? What are you going to do if you don't get approved? Response: The purpose of this addition is to allow the commercial area north of the entrance at Orangetree to allow for a more developable lot. The existing commercial site has preserve on the west side and is required to provide access through the lot to adjacent properties to the north. The additional land will allow for the commercial lot to be reconfigured to make it more developable. If the Amendment does not get approved, then development would need to meet the current development standards and fit within the approved commercial area. It is a net increase of 0.12-acres of commercial based on the acreages shown on the approved MCP. (Chad Everett) When does this commercial expansion stop? We need to stop this creep. I'm personally against this and will do everything I can to stop it. PL20220003426/PL20220003428 BCHD I PUDR NIM Summary Page 2 Packet Pg. 162 9.B.3 PENINSULAt� ENGINEERING Question/Comment: (Ty Vigil, 180 33rd Ave NE) As a commercial realtor, I'm in favor of development but it needs to be smart. The County just approved a transitional use plan and there should be appropriate flow from commercial to residential. We love the rural attributes of the Estates. Since these properties have been cleared, we're experiencing more wildlife in our areas. I'm for development just against this type. It should be developed but there's too much traffic and the apartments aren't even here yet. There are already crosses on the road and now more people will need to cross Immokalee to get to school. It doesn't meet the county resolution on transitional uses; it doesn't flow right ... it goes commercial to residential. So, I don't really have a question, but I just have that statement to be recorded. Response: (Chris Scott) I will note that the location of the preserve and stormwater ponds are intended to provide a transition from the commercial development to the adjacent Estates properties. (Ty Vigil) There is damage to trees from where the property has been cleared and who replaces that. And someone will need to inspect and remove invasives. In this current form, I'm not against development, but I'm against this. Question/Comment: (Judy Womelsdorf, 3214 Brookeview Court) How much of the land is wetlands? Response: (Chris Scott) I don't have that information in front of me. The application includes environmental analysis and the preserve area being added has a considerable amount of wetlands. Any development that occurs, in regards to wetlands impacts, will need state and/or federal approval. (Judy Womelsdorf, 3214 Brookeview Court) Any wetland credits that are purchased for impacts go to the center of the state and don't help the local wildlife, flora and fauna. That's one concern I have with the request. I think the whole area was wetlands and I don't think they should be destroyed. Questions/Comment: (Dick Brewer, 2871 4t" St NE) What type of buffer is provided on the southwest corner of the property between the commercial area and the adjacent Estates property. Right now from my front yard I can see all the way to Immokalee Road so I would like to some buffer so I don't see commercial buildings. Response: (Chris Scott) There is a 15-foot wide Type B buffer, as required by County Code, on the western boundary. That buffer includes trees spaced 25-feet on center and a five-foot tall hedge. The southern boundary is also a Type B buffer where it abuts residential uses and a 10-foot wide Type A buffer where it abuts other commercial uses. Question/Comment: (Name not provided) Have you cleared out all of the trees up to the boundary already? There are no trees on your side there currently where it backs up to a red barn. Response: (Chris Scott) The development has to meet stormwater requirements and get an Environmental Resource Permit approval from South Florida Water Management PL20220003426/PL20220003428 BCHD I PUDR NIM Summary Page 3 Packet Pg. 163 9.B.3 PENINSULAt� ENGINEERING District. In order to construct the required perimeter berms to make sure that stormwater remains on site, that area has been cleared. That buffer area will be planted in the future. Will there be a wall? (Chris Scott) I'm not sure about the specifics for the storage development; the LDC does not require a wall at this location and it was not a requirement of the PUD. (Eric Mallory) There is not a wall proposed with the storage building. Question/Comment: (Dan Brett, 6920 241" Ave NE) Have they submitted for a traffic light at the entrance. (Chris Scott) There is an existing traffic signal at the main entrance from Immokalee Road at Orangetree Boulevard. That is the only access to the site. It was already approved and there is no request to change that with this application. There is no access to 4t" Street. The development will provide the required interconnection to the north and the south. Question/Comment: (Name not provided) It looks like they are doing some type of changes in there on Immokalee Road further south of the Orangetree Boulevard. (Chris Scott) Those improvements are associated with the adjacent PUD and I do not have details. You could check with Collier County to verify what improvements and access are required and approved for that development. Question/Comment: (Ty Vigil) Modify my comments a little bit in regards to C-1 through C-3 is a broad term of uses. Nursing and professional care and medical could help with the area. When we see carwashes and laboratories and self -storage and warehousing it leaves us a little uncomfortable. Not opposed to development, just do it smart. Jobs would make sense as commercial would help make self-sustaining communities as we head east. If there are jobs in medical, then that would make sense. Some uses are an emphatic no. Response: (Chris Scott) This amendment is primarily to reconfigure the commercial areas. It is not proposing to change any of the permitted uses that have already been approved for the development. Question/Comment: (Chad Everett) Can't you remove uses with this amendment? Since the developer wants more, why don't you make some concessions. Self -storage isn't needed. Bill told me this was going to be a medical place and now I hear about storage uses. Response: (Eric Mallory) I'll tell you where we're at. We have a range of uses, but its not done; people are still in their due -diligence period. With price increases, things can change. The property along Immokalee (bottom right) is actually two outparcels which will include a potential McDonalds at the intersection and then a larger outparcel below that is planned to be a medial office building. The southwest commercial area is proposed to be a self -storage; and there is only one self -storage between this PL20220003426/PL20220003428 BCHD I PUDR NIM Summary Page 4 Packet Pg. 164 9.B.3 PENINSULAt� ENGINEERING development and the adjacent PUD. North of the storage is another medical office building. There are two medical office buildings planned here. The northern C is why we are amending the PUD. We want to square up that lot and want to do a small shopping center. The deviation will allow parking up front. That is really all we are asking for. Our project is relatively small and discreet. Question/Comment: (No name provided) There was supposed to be a shopping center on Randall on the west side for a Publix and CVS. Why are we going to build another one here? Response: (Eric Mallory) I don't know anything about the shopping center you're talking about. This is a relatively small center. For example, a Publix is approximately 55,000 sf; the total square footage we're talking about here is 35,000 sf at most. It is a community shopping center that is likely to be anchored by a hardware store and a small one at that. A Home Depot or Lowes is approximately 100,000 sf. This is not that scale. This is to serve the community and we don't have any other retail proposed. Question/Comment: (No name provided) And no one seems to know anything about this 450 apartments. A couple years ago it was supposed to be a retirement community. Now we don't know if they're low rent apartment, cheaper or whatever. Is there any way to know what is going on? Response: (Eric Mallory) That developer is the Davis Group and it is a different developer. Question/Comment: (Ty Vigil) As you are explaining this, it is growing on me a smidge. I would just say we don't want nightlife. We are ok with hardware ... we just don't want that restaurant that is open until 2 am? Response: (Chris Scott) In looking at the Zoom chat, the only question is how to obtain a copy of the presentation. My contact information was on the letter and feel free to reach out to me and I'll send you a copy. Question/Comment: (Woody Brula, 2393 Orchard St) Are you the group that I got a draft of a lawsuit regarding the lot line? From what I'm reading is when they laid down the lots they put it in the wrong place. Response: (Eric Mallory) That is not this law firm, but it is from this developer. The monuments were in the wrong place. So from 4t" Street to Immokalee there is 30' missing. (Chris Scott) That affects all lots between 4t" Street and Immokalee. There was a surveying error when they were first putting down those roads from the original Golden Gate plat. The canal that is to the west is 30' larger than it should be and the land between 4tn and Immokalee is 30' smaller. That is a separate matter that isn't a part of this application. Question/Comment: (Judy Womelsdorf, 3214 Brookeview Ct) My biggest concern is the traffic. Getting out is difficult and if there was an emergency. What you have to go through just to get to Publix is awful. I don't see anyone ever addressing traffic. PL20220003426/PL20220003428 BCHD I PUDR NIM Summary Page 5 Packet Pg. 165 9.B.3 PENINSULAxi ENGINEERING (Chad Everett) I made this point last time and no one cares. The commissioners don't care about traffic; they don't live out here. We want this to stop; we don't want it to reach Oil Well. My goal is to stop this. The bears that live in this area; we now have four bear families living in our area. I understand what you're trying to do, but we need to stop it. Question/Comment: (No name given) Between Valencia Trail and Shadowlawn; its Peninsula and it's called N- Square or Immokalee Square. It's another apartment project — hundreds of apartments. Response: (Chris Scott) That is a separate project. If there are no more questions regarding this application, then we will adjourn the meeting. The meeting is adjourned. PL20220003426/PL20220003428 BCHD I PUDR NIM Summary Page 6 Packet Pg. 166 - peob aale3louaual 9ZV£OOOZZOZId : 89V9Z) slel-IOWNl WIN - 8 4uauayoe4lV :}uawgOL'jjV d T m LJ fa �U E E 0 U Ln a) a--+ Ln LU I m aC N 0 E E m CD z w w z O Q OC O LL z 0 0 O NO O 2 w z - peob aalelouaual 9Z17£OOOZZOZId 89V9Z) slel-IOWNl WIN - 8 }uauayoe;;d :}uawgoe;;d 00 omi \ J ur Ci) a Jzfy Y �W a W Z Z_(D c Zz W w .O +� a Q �, CT O W � + o a E 4-1 � v � (1) V) E °' o � O U _ O hA � O � � � O Q N Q 0 CT_O Q O cn O `n -_ - 0 0 N - peob aalelouaual 9ZV£OOOZZOZId : 89V9Z) slel-IOWNl WIN - 8 4uauayoe4lV :}uawgoelIv BIZ N Z O U0 O oc z F.RAd ZI w 2 U J W I w sell Ln W 1 a� w m m U w - peob aalelouaual 9Z17£000ZZOZId : 89V9Z) slel-IOWNl WIN - 8 4uauayoe4lV :}uawgoelIv 0 \J Ci) ur a Jz CD 1 a a a z 0 a U O - peob aaleIowwl 9Zb£OOOZZOZId : 89bSZ) Sleua;eW WIN - 8 }uawyoe;;d :}uawyoe;;d 1T BIZ z 0 Q oc O LL U w mmn oc a -7 W V u 0 E U vi c�6 p , •� p U Q) 0O U) U N = —i w N _ N 0 m 0 v N +� CDw N Ln � � �� .v U .� O 4- ' +� p O Z3 O Q� O 1 1 .i / 0 V) .O E � u U) X 0 N �6 O O OU O V// /� Q) /L.- � V QD N O U V) N U O +, U Q � Q (4r) C� Q) 0 Zj 13) a m Y V R a - peob aale310Luual 9Zti£000ZZOZId 10:4741( N N Ln Ln cn J— W W W W W U lD z g DC w H Q Z F- X LU c-I 99b5Z) slelJa;eW WIN - 84uawLIOe4;d :4uawy3e4lV L U 1p 00 m r1 ca +� O Q v O E Q = .. to -j �, LU> cc z i N N *' n N Ln 4 W C6 E � N a' O > c� c/f H i a fib= o� oy ❑ Y ff � � ry e 'A.O O~[w��9 II W U1� LL I Wdw f U1 wah ' lI a" 13 Iu�nnal�+�EE Rao - --�� r-- - V�i U w w uai O x w wz L ' m a W 02 wgo 7 y' F. ❑ 2 0. LU �W w n a � m ul �7 W -z w '# r in 3 L m �w a wa a ffip 1 II 4¢�w�l,t ¢ ui❑wm46 i, 0 a t> 4z , Lu F w � N w m z d o II: [K W W n w n- wIn u a 2 I w 0 CCa 11 Lu LL V] 'm o z¢ 1-� 4TH gTPFET N.E. 0. 0 Z LLJ {7 LLJ L [p C CD 6) Cfi 12 LU H - peob aalelOLUMI 9Z17£OOOZZOZId : 89V9Z) slel-IOWNl WIN - 8 }uauayoe;;d :}uawgoe;;d Of ` Qcn cn cn cn +n _Z J +n iJ v iJ uJ u U U U U �Z _ ? N 111 N r -I lD N q lD Lq -I � i Z N rI z g rl U Z O U DC W H a 0 w O a O oc a Q 'v tCC7A CC C UJ CL fD +j - 4J Z > i G N C/) a + i n E N Ln 4 W � a' O + > c6 I- �y Oa ax ��CMoti�nerW �o — omx33mnwwi �, N W (D Q U 0 w cn O a O ac a - peob aale310wual 9Zti£000ZZOZId : 99b5Z) SIelJa;eW WIN - 84uawy3041V :;uawy3e4;d c U L- Q) i + + ' + + MID wI � rq 0 m qqr 0 CL IL �r,4Ln�co rn CLL,T -� 00 �DChr-4 u rq 0rq�T-1cm H c :p M y w a) u m V) w LU Cp C L ro c >ru Q aj u tin L L V1 E L u R;r C J - peob aalelouaual 9Z17£000ZZOZId : 89V9Z) slel-IOWNl WIN - 8 4uauayoe4lV :}uawgoelIv Of �` m ! -. N W z Q U w O a O oc a C6 LlJ Q) E O N Q) U 0 U U U) cn O V) Q) I N c O N El s m Q m 2 t) Q 01 • N Q) I, 0 • H m U Q) E E O O tl0 O O O O O N E O 4-1 .Ln Q� 4- 0 4- Ln CD O 0 O a--j U O U C6 E Un 4-1 - Q) E E E O U a--j N O Q) O U O 11 O N LA Q� m Q �0 C6 Q O E O O 0 0 Q Q) z - peoa OGIBIOwwl 9Zti£OOOZZOZId : 99tiSZ) SIeIJa;SW WIN - 8 ;uaw43BUV :;uaw43BU y 1T Z J— w cn O a O oc a = O w O O c O N N c O N +� j > +� N O N O N L N 4--1 � N ---j cn c6 -0 � C10 L 4- N v 1 N O LnN p O Q� tZ0 Ln N Q v Q 4-' N OZ � O � Q Nu- OU v U N U OU 4—+ Q M �' O J O O p O O � � � 0O a--, c� oC CU c6 E Q � cn _ cu 4 O N cn O J tZ0 a- c� N a--� O +, N Q - - +� Q E zc°'E°-0mE.-�0-N - peob aalelouaual 9Z17£000ZZOZId : 89V9Z) slel-IOWNl WIN - 8 4uauayoe4lV :}uawgoelIv h \J Ci) ur a Jz CD 1 a N Z O on so4e4sa 4- a) a) a) E E 0 cn a) 4-a (n ui C\l00 6 CIO cu C) co 0 00 o c ry C) CN ap a) ici C\l m -TO E cu CN L- -�e -J 0 0 a. W- E— c4 E 0 �'c: 0 D 0 co :3 CL 0 0 (D r CY) a) co z :u:-) PBON 88le5lOwwl 9ZVCOOOZZOZ'ld 89'PGZ) Slel-TOWN WIN El 4uGwLl3e44V:;U8W143e4jv 00 1-Z 7-- 113 �Nl <j 04, , 9 CL cc Nj 7 C, 01 CL CIS 41 NJ J C 0 to [,I —N z so4e4sa Ci Im 0; E W E 0 cn 4" CU , 0) w 00 �p w CV0 - 6 'A - (51) 2 cu o T 0 0 C) o C) 01) (D N = V) a) clq cu E m O L- 0 cN) CN-�e 0 4— E E cc :t D o ch CL 0 (D cu �+- (-) L— Cl) 0 --,) X w m U) -C -C 0) LL< m z :L DL PBON 88le5lOwwl 9ZVCOOOZZOZ'ld 89'PGZ) Slel-IOWN WIN El 4uGwLl3e44V:;U8wt43e4jv rn ti a. to I ui r\ t r 01 i 0 U U) zl W I C\l 'IT c1r) C) 0 0 C\l N 0 04 —i n 4-0 Cl) CO so4e4sa 4- (D a) a) -C E U) E C 0 1 C: 0) a)VJ 4-CD U) CO w N a) 4;4 6 - a) or) C) C') m 0 0 o cj� 0 0 C) a) N Lo (N cu S? 0 E co Coll cu C\l L- -2 -1 0 C'� 0 '1- E c 0cN E'a i >-' ZE 0 CU =) a)CL 0 C: C: a) " 0 -cIo x -W C>U' 3: -0 C: a) z Z)LL PBON 88le5lOwwl 9ZVCOOOZZOZ'ld 89'PGZ) Slel-TOWN WIN El 4uGwLl3e44V:;U8wt43e4jv CD 00 m a. ui N 1Q, 0 r z 9.B.3 N ttu aptrs 43a* NTtws PART OF THE USA TODAY NETWORK Published Daily Naples, FL 34110 PENINSULA ENGINEERING 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY NAPLES, FL 34105 ATTN Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WISCONSIN COUNTY OF BROWN Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, personally appeared who on oath says that they serve as legal clerk of the Naples Daily News, a daily newspaper published at Naples, in Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida; that the attached copy of the advertising was published in said newspaper on dates listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples, in said Collier County, Florida , for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. 1 /11 /2023 Subscribed and sworn to before on January 11th, 2023 Notary, State of WI, County of Brown My commission expires: " PUBLICATION COST: $302.40 KA:ate EEN ALLEN AD No: GC11000123 ary Public CUSTOMER NO: 585101 Stf Wisconsin PO#: PUBLIC NOTICE AD SIZE: DISPLAY AD 2X4.5 Packet Pg. 181 9.B.3 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING ADVERNSEMENT Newspaper Advertisement Layout: Project Location Map must be minimum of 2 inches by 3 inches: NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING The public is invited to attend a neighborhood information meeting hosted by Chris Scott of Peninsula Engineering and Noel Davies of Davies Duke, PLLC on Thursday, January 26, 2023, at 5:30 p.m. at the UFIIFAS Extension Collier County, 147001mmokalee Road, Naples, FL 34120. BCHD Partners I, LLC is seeking approval of a GMPA and PUDZ to add a 2.69-acre Estates zoned parcel that fronts on Immokalee Road to the existing 19.13-acre Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict (Ord 2021-19) and BCHD I CPUD (Ord 2021-20), The applications increase the size of the Subdistrict and CPUD to 21.82-acres, revise the allowed commercial intensity from 200,000 s.f. of gross commercial floor area to 100,000 s.f. of commercial floor area and 130,000 s.f of indoor -storage warehouse, including a deviation to parking lot design standards and providing other minor edits. The subject property consists of 21.82 acres, located on the west side of Immokalee Road opposite Orangetree Boulevard, in Section 22, Township 48 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. [PL20220003246 and PL202200032442791. ttt SUBJECT �< ai WolfRD GoDR T PROPERTY ' J¢�D cyt'`� taw ten, A f i t � 7 29h AVE HE 2MAVE NE Business and property owners, residents, and visitors are welcome to attend the presentation and discuss the project. If you are unable to attend this meeting in person, but have questions or comments or wish to attend simultaneously through Zoom, please contact: Chris Scott, Planning Manager, Peninsula Engineering, 2600 Golden Gale Parkway, Naples, FL 34105 cscott@pen-eng.com (239) 403-6727. No-CCHN0123-01 O d d M Y O E E W N le M O O O N N O N J a O RO N r+ ii m r C d E t 0 cc -W y+ a CD E V M a Packet Pg. 182 j 9.B.3 s� PENINSULAt� ENGINEERING 4 January 10, 2023 Dear Property Owner: The public is invited to attend a Neighborhood Information Meeting to discuss the following planning and zoning applications that have been formally submitted to the Collier County Growth Management Department: ➢ Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA, PL20220003426) to expand the Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict ➢ Planned Unit Development Zoning (PUDZ, PL20220003428) to expand and amend the BCHD I Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) Thursday, January 26, 2023, at 5:30 pm OF/IFAS Extension Collier County 14700 Immokalee Road Naples, FL 34120 BCHD Partners I, LLC is seeking approval of a GMPA and PUDZ to add a 2.69-acre Estates zoned parcel that fronts on Immokalee Road to the existing 19.13-acre Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict (Ord 2021-19) and BCHD I CPUD (Ord 2021-20). The applications increase the size of the Subdistrict and CPUD to 21.82-acres, revise the allowed commercial intensity from 200,000 s.f. of gross commercial floor area to 100,000 s.£ of commercial floor area and 130,000 s.f. of indoor -storage warehouse, including a deviation to parking lot design standards and providing other minor edits. The subject property consists of 21.82 acres, located on the west side of Immokalee Road opposite Orangetree Boulevard, in Section 22, Township 48 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. MAVENE SulJECT OII WNf 1t OF PROPERTY §I .�"ofe g a Z i % �V1 29h AVE FC 2R.AvENE girtlls Ma The Neighborhood Information Meeting is for informational purposes; it is not a public hearing. On-line participation in the meeting will be available via Zoom. If you have questions related to the project or would like to participate virtually, please contact the individual listed below. Christopher Scott, AICP Peninsula Engineering Phone: 239.403.6727; Email: cscott@pen-eng.com 2600 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, Florida, 34105 Ottice 239.403.6700 Fax 239.261.1797 Fla Engineer CA 28275 Fla Landscape CA LC26000632 Fla Surveyor/Mapper LB8479 Packet Pg. 183 9.B.5 (CHAPTER 8, COLLIER COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT) A zoning sign(s) must be posted by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent on the parcel for a minimum of fifteen (15) calendar days in advance of the first public hearing and said sign(s) must be maintained by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent through the Board of County Commissioners Hearing. Below are general guidelines for signs, however these guidelines should not be construed to supersede any requirement of the LDC. For specific sign requirements, please refer to the Administrative Code, Chapter 8 E. The sign(s) must be erected in full view of the public, not more than five (5) feet from the nearest street right-of-way or easement. The sign(s) must be securely affixed by nails, staples, or other means to a wood frame or to a wood panel and then fastened securely to a post, or other structure. The sign may not be affixed to a tree or other foliage. The petitioner or the petitioner's agent must maintain the sign(s) in place, and readable condition until the requested action has been heard and a final decision rendered. If the sign(s) is destroyed, lost, or rendered unreadable, the petitioner or the petitioner's agent must replace the sign(s) NOTE: AFTER THE SIGN HAS BEEN POSTED, THIS AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE SHOULD BE RETURNED NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORKING DAYS BEFORE THE FIRST HEARING DATE TO THE ASSIGNED PLANNER. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTINGNOTICE STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER BEFORE THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, PERSONALLY APPEARED Christopher O. Scott WHO ON OATH SAYS THAT HE/SHE HAS POSTED PROPER NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 10.03.00OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE ON THE PARCEL COVERED IN PETITION NUMBER AIGKATUREOF APPLICA T OR AGENT Christopher O. Scott NAME (TYPED OR PRINTED) STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER 2600 Golden Gate Parkway STREET OR P.O. BOX Naples, FL 34105 CITY, STATE ZIP The foregoing instrument was sworn to and subscribed before me this [9T1w day 1-PP-1'- of zo23 , by Christopher O. Scott ,who is personally known to me and who did take anoath. 4ai SMINA HARDY MY COMMISSION # HH 3430 -,,.�.....oP; EXPIRES: January 14, 2027 My Commission Expires: (Stamp with serial number) Signature of NotaryPublic Printed Name of Notary Public Packet Pg. 184 9.113.5 PENINSULA`S ENGINEERING 4 Immokalee Road -Estates Commercial Subdistrict GMPA, PL20220003426 BCHD I PUDR, PL20220003428 Collier County Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners Public Hearing Sign Posting —April 18, 2023 Packet Pg. 185 aS4�a Y ag46�s 11" 1 WEDNESDAY, MAY 24, 2023 1 NAPLES DAILY NEWS 9.B.6 ..NOTICE OF PURL C ."EARING NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCES Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) at 9:00 A.M. on June 13, 2023, in the Board of -County Commissioners meeting room, third floor, Collier Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Naples FL to consider: AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO.89-05, AS AMENDED, THE OOLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORI DA, SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE RU- RAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SUB -ELEMENT OF THE GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN ELEMENT AND RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES FUTURE LAND DE MAP AND MAP SERIES TO REVISE THE IMMOKALEE ROAD — ESTATES COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT TO ADD 2.69s ACRES TO THE SUBDISTRICT; ALLOW 130,000 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF INDOOR SELF STORAGE; AND TO REDUCE COMMERCIAL USES FROM 200,000 SQUARE FEET TO 100,000 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR AREA ON PROPERTY CONSISTING OF 21.62m ACRES; AND FUTHERMORE, DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE ADOPTED AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED APPROXIMATELY ONE-HALF MILE NORTH OF RANDALL BOULEVARD ON THE WEST SIDE OF IMMOKALEE ROAD, IN SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA, [PL20220003426] AND AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2021-20, THE BCHD 1 COMMERCIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, BY ADDING ACREAGE AND USES; BY AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLAS- SIFICATION OF AN ADDITIONAL 2.691 ACRES OF LAND ZONED ESTATES (E) TO THE BCHD 1 COMMERCIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (CPUD); BY ADDING 130,000 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF INDOOR SELF -STORAGE; BY REDUCING COMMERCIAL USES FROM 200,000 SQUARE FEET TO 100,000 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR AREA; BY AMENDING THE MASTER PLAN; BY AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION; BY ADDING A DEVIATION TO OFF-STREET PARKING DESIGN; BY UPDATING DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED APPROXIMATELY ONE-HALF MILE NORTH OF RANDALL BOULEVARD ON THE WEST SIDE OF IMMOKALEE ROAD, IN SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, WITH THE ENTIRE PUD CONSISTING OF 21.82m ACRES. [PL20220003428) -_._.._.__.._ Project Location .-- ................ / oil Welt RD LL I ti[ _---- ---- _..._0..... R Randall BLVD t immokalee ........ - ---- _ —..._ - --- - I Copies of the proposed Ordinances are on file with the Clerk to the Board and are available for inspection. All interested parties are invited to attend and be heard. All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County Manager prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to three (3) minutes on any item. The selection of any individual to speak on babel of an organization or group is encouraged. It recognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted ten (10) minutes to speak on an item. Written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. All materials used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. As part of an ongoing initiative to encourage public involvement, the public will have the opportunity to provide public comments remotely, as well as in person, during this proceeding. Individuals who would like to. participate remotely should register through the link provided within the specific event/meeting entry on the Calendar of Events on the County website at www.colliercountyfl.gov/our-county/visirors/calertdar-of-events after the agenda is posted on the County well Registration should be done in advance of the public mee8rg, or any deadline specified within the public meeting notice. Individuals who register will receive an.email in advance of the public hearing detailing how .they can participate remotely in this meeting. Remote participation is provided as a courtesy and is at the user's risk. The County is not responsible for technical issues. For additional information abort the meeting, please call Geoffrey Willig at 252-8369 or email o Geoffrey.Willig@colliercountyfl.gov. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are emitted, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance, Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management'Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 25278380, at least two (2) days prior to the meeting:. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA RICK LOCASTRO, CHAIRMAN CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT & COMPTROLLER By: Jennifer Hansen, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) Packet Pg. 186 1 PENINSULAjv.,SL ENGINEERING September 15, 2022 Collier County Growth Management Department Planning & Zoning 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 RE: Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict GMP Amendment — PL20220003426 1' Review To Whom It May Concern, The following have been included for your review and approval: 1. Cover Letter 2. Completed Addressing Checklist 3. Pre -Application Meeting Notes 4. GMPA Application 5. Recorded Warranty Deed 6. Affidavit of Authorization 7. Exhibit II: Property Ownership Disclosure Forms 8. Exhibit III.B: Boundary Survey and Legal Description 9. Exhibit IV.B: Proposed Subdistrict Text 10. Exhibit IV.D.1: Proposed Rural Golden Gate Estates FLUM 11. Exhibit IV.D.2: Proposed Immokalee Road -Estates Commercial Subdistrict Inset Map 12. Exhibit V.A.1: Location Map 13. Exhibit V.A.2: Aerial Map 14. Exhibit V.A.3: Existing Zoning and Land Use Map 15. Exhibit V.B: Existing Future Land Use Map 16. Exhibit V.C: Environmental Data 17. Exhibit V.D: Narrative, Criteria and Consistency 18. Exhibit V.E.3: Public Facilities 19. Exhibit V.F.1: FIRM Map 20. Exhibit V.F.2: Wellfield Map 21. Companion BCHD I PUDA (PL20220003428) Please feel free to contact me at (239) 403-6727 or by email at cscott@pen-eng.com should you have any questions or require additional information. Sincer ly, Ch istopher O. Scott, AICP Planning Manager 2600 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, Florida, 34105 Office 239.403.6700 Fax 239.261.1797 Fla Engineer CA 28275 Fla Landscape CA LC26000632 Fla Surveyor/Mapper LB8479 Cori-ier County Growth Management Department ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following and email to GMD_Addressing@colliercountyfl.gov or submit in person to the Addressing Section at the address listed below. This form must be signed by Addressing personnel prior to the pre -application meeting. Please allow 3 business days for processing. Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Section. PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below. Complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type). ❑ BL (Blasting Permit) ❑ SDP (Site Development Plan) ❑ BD (Boat Dock Extension) ❑ SDPA (SDP Amendment) ❑ Carnival/Circus Permit ❑ SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP) ❑ CU (Conditional Use Permit) ❑ SIP (Site Improvement Plan) ❑ EXP (Excavation Permit) ❑ SIN (Insubstantial Change to SIP) ❑ FP (Final Plat) ❑ SNR (Street Name Change) ❑ LLA (Lot Line Adjustment) ❑ SNC (Street Name Change — Unplatted) ❑ PNC (Project Name Change) ❑ TDR (Transfer of Development Rights) ❑ PPL (Plans & Plat Review) ❑ VA (Variance) ❑ PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) ❑ VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit) ❑ PUD Rezone ❑ VRSFP (Vegetation Removal & Site Fill Permit) ❑ RZ (Standard Rezone) ❑✓ OTHER GMPA LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be attached) T48, R27, S22 FOLIO (Property ID) Number(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) 37698580002 STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned) • LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right-of-way • SURVEY (copy — only needed for unplatted properties) CURRENT PROJECT NAME (if applicable) PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable) PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existing projects/sites only) SDP or AR or PL # Addressing Checklist (Rev 12/2021) Page 1 of 2 Operations & Regulatory Management Division • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 • 239-252-2400 www.coll iercountyfl.gov Co yer County Growth Management Department Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if application, indicate whether proposed or existing) Please Return Approved Checklist By: DEmail Applicant Name: Kim Davidson Phone: (239) 403-6807 ❑Personally picked up Email: kdavidson(@r)en-ene.com Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Division. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number 37698580002 Approved by: f �+ Date: Updated by: Date: 4/27/2022 IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR A NEW FORM SUBMITTED. Addressing Checklist (Rev 12/2021) Page 2 of 2 Operations & Regulatory Management Division • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 • 239-252-2400 www.coll iercountyfl.gov Print� [ Tax Bills Change of Address Property Summary 11 Property Detail 11 Sketches Trim Notices Parcel No 37698580002 Site Address *Disclaimer Site City NAPLES Site Zone *Note 34120 ■ Name / Address ' HERRERA, LAZARO A=& ELIZABETH 9661 SW 102ND AVENUE RD City I MIAMI I State I FL I Zip 1 33176-2734 1 Map No. Strap No. Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3C22 332500 121 13C22 22 48 27 2.73 Legal GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 S 165 FT OF TR 121 LESS THAT PORTION FOR R/W AS DESC IN IOR 3111 PG 485. Millage Area O 285 Sub./Condo 332500 - GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT Use Code O 0 - VACANT RESIDENTIAL Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Millage Rates 0 *Calculations 22 School Other Total 4.889 8.7793 13.6683 2021 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Date Book -Page Amount Land Value 01/27/97 2276-560 $ 7,500+� Improved Value (_) Market Value $ 62,790 $0 1W MAP 5r2E SMALL IYE61VYI UHkGE 40 Introduction Search for Parcels by Search Results Layers Legend +> Print Aerial Photography: January - 2022 Urban [61N] - 2022 Rural [21FT] - 2022 Rural [10FT] - 2022 Rural [50FT] Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.coliiercountyfl.gov (239) 252-2400 Pre -Application Meeting Notes Petition Type: PUDA with GMPA Companion DateandTime: Tuesday 6/7/22 - 9:00 AM - ZOOM Mtg. GMPA - Rachel Hansen Assigned Planner: PUDA - Nancy Gundlach Engineering Manager jfor PPL's and FP'sj: Project Information PL20220003428-BCHD37698520004,37698580002(PUDA) Project NamePL20220003426-Immokalee Rd Estates Commercial Subdist. (GMPA) PL #: see above aciciin a Propertyll3#: 37598580002-New Current Zoning: HCHD I CPUD -New Es�ates Parcel Project Address: City: Na les State; FL Zip: 34120 Applicant: Kim Davidson, Peninsula Engineering Agent Name: Christo her Scott,AICP Phone: 239-403-6700 Agent/Firm Address: 2600 Golden Gate PKWYCity.Naples State: FL Zip: 39105 Property Owner: Herrera, Lazaro A. & Elizabeth Please provide the following, if applicable: I. Total Acreage: 2 .73 ii. Proposed # of Residential Units: iii. Proposed Commercial Square Footage: r ' Y�11 Qi1� y LdJ iv. For Amendments, indicate the original petition number: ~'J V. if there is an ordinance or Resolution associated with this project, please indicate the type and number; 2 J L I vi. If the project is within a Plat, provide the name and AR#/PL#: Updated 1/12/2021 Page 1 1 of 5 Coder County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 wwwxoiliercountyfl.>~o►t (239) 252-2400 Meeting Notes As of 10/16/2017 all Zoning applications have revised applications, and your associated Application is included in your notes, additionally a *new Property Ownership Disclosure Form is required for all applications. A copy of this new form is included in your pre-app 414 ZLl L L I ' -e- r If Site is within the City of Naples Water Service Area please send to Naples Utilities and Planning Departments. Then, if the petition is submitted, we are to send it (by email) to the four persons below in their Utilities and Planning Depts. - along with a request that they send us a letter or email of "no objection" to the petition. Bob Middleton RMiddleton(a),naplesgoy.com Allyson Holland AMHollandC7a, napiesgoy.com Robin Singer RSinger@naplesgov.com Erica Martin emartinCa�naplesgov.com Disclaimer., Information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application: Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required data. Updated 1/12/2021 Page 1 2 of 5 Coder Count COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliercountVfl.goy (239) 252-2400 Meeting Notes C0177P 1IIL+r+1-r' L1411Z NLI I 5 - '-e /}71".e Ft CM r4 10-- :� — ►v c� C' 0 'K U'a:v TS — b e �' 1) . elh�ed,IlL,.fis — 3EP1 ._ 3.1 `8_ 5 t b try--+•� �. � i �e r C L C1 r'+.-i� � L �S .�' -,y ► rt�-T L��; r2, � s2 5 i r r:: r.5 �L1 �� LrL �-1 �� l..r f l � 5 — � ��vrt1 �►�-e.� D`*'. t�Pri w� �L�.s-�-� C_' �•.rr f� i Other required documentation for submittal (not listed on application): Disclaimer.- Information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Cade and LDC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required data. Updated 1/12/2021 Page 1 3 of 5 ThomasClarkeVEN From: AshtonHeidi Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2022 9:19 AM To: ThomasClarkeVEN Cc: GundlachNancy Subject: Pre-App h for PUDA to BCHD 37698520004,37698580002 (PUDA) - PL20220003428 bt'i eS Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed Thomas, Please add this to the pre-app notes: Please label the offsite access easement to the south on the master plan with OR Book and Page reference. Thank you! F-Kdr .4slhtovwCi.eleo MA vL O LVtZ3 Assl sta v t= Cokvwtd AttorKtd o f f ce of the Couwto ,4ttOWw 29,00 North F- orseshoe DrWe, 5u6te 301 Naples, FL 34104 (239) 2,.52-g 73 Under Florida Law. e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. c'V_ 3,A-- ThomasClarkeVEN From: KlopfParker Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2022 10:19 AM To: ThomasClarkeVEN Cc: SaboJames Subject: RE: Pre-App Research for PUDA to BCH❑ 37698520004,37698580002 (PUDA) - PL20220003428 & Companion (GMPA)-Immokalee Rd Estates Commercial Subdist.(GMPA) PL20220003426 Comp Planning. Notes: According the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) the subject property that is proposed to be added to the existing Immokalee Road Estates Commercial subdistrict is located within the Residential Estates. The applicant has proposed a reconfiguration of the existing master plan subdistrict to increase the size of the existing commercial tracts with no increase in the intensity of the uses allowed to permit. Since the identified parcel was outside of the existing subdistrict a GMPA will be required to include it. Please address the following objective 5 and policies 7.1,7.3, & 7.6 Parker Klopf C:oWer C.c)u " cY Collier County Growth Management Department Senior Planner 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Direct line: (239) 252-2471 Parker.klopf@colliercountvfl.gov Visit our Webiste ot: WWW.COL LIERCQUNTYFL.GOV Tell us how ive are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at http:Ait. lylCoIIierZoning. Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request. do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Information contained in this email is subject to verification by the Zoning Manager and/or Planning Director; if this information is being used as a basis for the purchase/lease of a property or as a guide for the design of a project, it is recommended that a Zoning Verification Letter or Zoning Certificate Application is submitted to zoning services. Applications for a Zoning Verification Letter can be found here: https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/home/showdocument?id=69624 Zoning Certificate applications can be found here: htt s: www.colliercount fl. ov our- overnment divisions-f- r ❑ erations-re ulator -mana ement zonin -or-land-use-a lication zonin -other-land-use-a lications . From: ThomasClarkeVEN <Thomas.Clarke@ col Iiercountyfl.gov> Sent: Friday, June 3, 2022 1:08 PM To: Ashton Heidi rHeidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov>; Beard Laurie <Laurie.Beard@coliiercountyfl.gov>; BrownCraig Craig.Brown@colliercountyfl.gova; CookJaime <Jaime.Cook@colliercountyfl.gov>; CrotteauKathynell <Kathynell.Crotteau@cot Iiercountyfl.gov>; PerryDerek < Derek. Perry@ coIIiercountyfl.gov>; 0rtmanEric Eric.Ortman@colliercountyfl.gov>; Faulkner5ue Sue.Faulkner@colliercountyfl.gov>; CastroGabrieia Pdt('.e '� .�3 ThomasClarkeVEN From: SawyerM ichael Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2022 9:27 AM To: ThomasClarkeVEN; GundlachNancy; HansenRachel; Klop€Parker Subject: BCHD PUDA and GMPA pre app meeting Thomas, Please provide the following pre app meeting notes: For this petition request please provide a letter of no impact TI5 Waiver; separate letter on letterhead requesting the waiver based on no additional transportation impacts. Please include a brief outline of proposed changes, confirm no additional development impacts and the current trip cap will be retained. Please let us know of any questions -concerns. Respectfully, Michael Sawyer Project Manager • Transportation Management Services Department Transportation Planning 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Suite 103 Naples, Florida 34104 239-252-2926 m ichael.sawyerCrvcollierco untytl.goy Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead. contact this office by telephone or in writing. ThomasClarkeVEN From: Beard Laurie Sent- Tuesday, June 07, 2022 9:00 AM To: GundiachNancy Cc: ThomasGarkeVEN Subject: Pre-Appi!cation Meeting PL20220003428 - PUDA to BCHD 37698520004, 37698580002 (PUDA) Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed I have nothing for this one. Laurie Beard Project Manager Please note new address: PUD Monitoring, GMD 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Ft_ 34104 Laurie. Beard@CollierCountvFL.gov Phone:(239)-252-5782 r rouo�rsel�c''' �,�oULLOM Vr y Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. I ThomasClarkeVEN From: BrownCraig Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2022 2:19 PM To: ThomasClarkeVEN Subject: BCHD PUDA GMPA Immokalee RD Estates Attachments: PUDZ-PUDA checklist FOR REVIEWERS 2-2017.doc; Environmental data Checklist updated December 2016.doc Thomas, Here are the revised notes for this one... Thanks! Please provide Environmental Data: Please provide FLUCFCS aerial map of the subject property please include the invasive exotic plant percentage amounts and indicate which FLUCFCS are being considered Native Vegetation. Identify on a current aerial the acreage, location, and community types of all upland and wetland habitats on the project site, according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS), and provide a legend for each of the FLUCFCS Codes identified. Aerials and overlay information must be legible at the scale provided. Provide calculations for the acreage of native vegetation required to be retained on -site. In a separate report, demonstrate how the preserve selection criteria pursuant to 3.05.07 have been met. Where applicable, include in this report an aerial showing the project boundaries along with any undeveloped land. preserves, natural flowways or other natural land features, located on abutting properties. Please provide a current Listed species survey, which should include listed plants for the subject property. Provide supporting exhibits (i.e. Panther zones ect.) be sure to include Black Bear, and Florida Bonneted Bat as part of the evaluation. Provide a wildlife survey for the nests of bald eagle and for listed species known to inhabit biological communities similar to those existing on -site. The survey shall be conducted in accordance with the guidelines or recommendations of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Provide a survey for listed plants identified in 3.04.03. 4. Provide calculations on -site plan showing the appropriate acreage of native vegetation to be retained, the max. amount and ratios permitted to be created on -site or mitigated off -site. Exclude vegetation located within utility and drainage easements from the preserve calculations (LDC 3.05.07.13-D; 3.05.07.F; 3.05.07,H.1.d-e). Please clarify that the GMP will still be requesting 15% preservation versus the required 25% preservation. (ISM preservation .) If required, based on FLUCFCS and historical activities. Please provide environmental data to show suonort for the new area of preservation. The new areservation area must be equal or greater ecological value versus the existing approved selected preservation area . 5. Please address how the proposed project is consistent with Conservation Coastal Management Element (CCME) Policy 6.1 and Objective 7.1. 6. Explain how the project meets or exceeds the native vegetation requirements and minimizes impacts to listed species as required in the CCME. 7. Indicate how the project design minimizes impacts to listed species. Describe the measures that are proposed as mitigation for impacts to listed species. (if found onsite). S. Indicate wetlands to be impacted and the effects of the impact to their functions and how the project's design compensates for wetland impacts., if applicable. 9. The property is located in the Well Field Protection zone please address compliance with LDC Section 3.06.00. Please Check off $2500 Environmental Data Fee. Craig Brown Principal Environmental Specialist Development Review Division (239)252-2548. How are we doing? Please CLICK HERE to fill out a Customer Survey. We appreciate your Feedback! Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead. contact this office by telephone or in writing. Environmental PllDZ-PUTDA Checklist (non-RFMU) ProjectName PteM Ta �CNb PGZGzzoa��SczYa 6,pA G QCFi l] �LZiZ�. G 3�i 7-4a 1. Is the project is in compliance with the overlays, districts and/or zoning on the subject site and/or the surrounding properties? (CON, ST, PUD, RLSA, RFMU, etc.) (LDC 2.03.05-2.03.08; 4.08.00) Not in CV Library 2. Submit a current aerial photograph (available from the Property Appraiser's office) and clearly delineate the subject site boundary lines. If the site is vegetated, provide FLUCFCS overlay and vegetation inventory identifying upland, wetland and exotic vegetation (Admin. Code Ch. 3 G.1. Application Contents #24). FLUCFCS Overlay -P627 3. Clearly identify the location of all preserves and label each as "Preserve" on all plans. (LDC 3.05.07.H.1). Preserve Label- P546 4. Provide calculations on site plan showing the appropriate acreage of native vegetation to be retained, the max. amount and ratios permitted to be created on -site or mitigated off -site. Exclude vegetation located within utility and drainage easements from the preserve calculations (LDC 3.05.07.B-D; 3.05.07.F; 3.05.07.H. Ld-e). Preserve Calculation - P547 5. Created and retained preserve areas shall meet the minimum width requirements per LDC 3.05.07.H.1.b. Preserve Width - P603 6. Retained preservation areas shall be selected based on the criteria defined in LDC 3.05.07.A.3, include all 3 strata, be in the largest contiguous area possible and shall be interconnected within the site and to adjoining off -site preservation areas or wildlife corridors. (LDC 3.05.07.A.1-4) Preserve Selection- P550 7. Principle structures shall be located a minimum of 25' from the boundary of the preserve boundary. No accessory structures and other site alterations, fill placement, grading, plant alteration or removal, or similar activity shall be permitted within 10' of the boundary unless it can be shown that it will not affect the integrity of the preserve (i.e. stem wall or berm around wetland preserve). Provide cross -sections for each preserve boundary identifying all site alterations within 25'. (LDC 3.05.07.H.3; 6.01.02.C.) Preserve Setback — New 8. Wildlife survey required for sites where an EIS is not required, when so warranted. (LDC 10.02.02.A.2.f) Listed Species - P522 9. Provide Environmental Data identifying author credentials, consistency determination with the GMPs, off -site preserves, seasonal and historic high water levels, and analysis of water quality. For land previously used for farm fields or golf course, provide soil sampling/groundwater monitoring reports identifying any site contamination. (LDC 3.08.00) Environmental Data Required — P 522 10. PUD Document and Master Plan shall state the minimum acreage required to be preserved. (LDC 10.02.13.A.2 ) Master Plan Contents-P626 11. If the PUD includes a Preserve Tract section UP FOR DISCUSSION — DISCUSS WITH CAO When listing preserve uses, the following is suggested: A. Principal Use: Preserve; B. Accessory Uses: All other uses (list as applicable or refer to the LDC — see 1-3 below as typical uses listed by agents) (ensure Cite text states "subject to LDC section related to Allowable uses within County required preserves" Alternate format: A. Uses subject to LDC section Allowable uses within County required preserves: 1. Nature trails that do not reduce the amount of required preserve. 2. Passive Recreation uses, as per LDC requirements. 3. Stormwater only when in accordance with the LDC. �� 3,E.3, PUD Commitments and Site Plan notes Where preserves occur adjacent to development off site and will be used in lieu of landscape buffers, include the following condition in the environmental commitments section of the PUD document or master plan: Preserves may be used to satisfy the landscape buffer requirements after exotic vegetation removal in accordance with LDC sections 4.06.02 and 4.06.05.E,1. Supplemental plantings with native plant materials shall be in accordance with LDC section 3.05.07. 12. PUD Document shall identify any listed species found on site and/or describe any unique vegetative features that will be preserved on the site. (LDC 10.02.13.A.2.) Unique Features- P628 Example: A management plan for the entire project shall be submitted in accordance with the requirements and procedures of the LDC for listed species including but not Iimited to Black Bear, Gopher Tortoise and listed birds. The management plan shall be submitted prior to development of the first phase of the project. 13. Review cross -sections if provided; they are not required with the PUD. However, sometimes they are provided. Is there any fill proposed in the preserve? Additional Comments: ?A-(- e 3 • E. L4t Environmental Data Checklist Project Name -ro P°-tk0 The Environmental Data requirements can be found in LDC Section 3.08.00 Provide the EIS fee if PUD or CU. WHO AND WHAT COMPANY PREPARED THE ENVIRONMENTAL DATA REPORT? Preparation of Environmental Data. Environmental Data Submittal Requirements shall be prepared by an individual with academic credentials and experience in the area of environmental sciences or natural resource management. Academic credentials and experience shall be a bachelor's or higher degree in one of the biological sciences with at least two years of ecological or biological professional experience in the State of Florida. Please include revision dates on resubmittals. Identify on a current aerial, the location and acreage of all SFWMD jurisdictional wetlands according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS) and include this information on the SDP or final plat construction plans. Wetlands must be verified by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) or Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) prior to SDP or final plat construction plans approval. For sites in the RFMU district, provide an assessment in accordance with 3.05.07 F and identify on the FLUCFCS map the location of all high quality wetlands (wetlands having functionality scores of at least 0.65 WRAP or 0.7 UMAM) and their location within the proposed development plan. Sites with high quality wetlands must have their functionality scores verified by the SFWMD or DEP prior to first development order approval. Where functionality scores have not been verified by either the SFWMD or DEP, scores must be reviewed and accepted by County staff, consistent with State regulation. 4. SDP or final plat construction plans with impacts to five (5) or more acres of wetlands shall provide an analysis of potential water quality impacts of the project by evaluating water quality loadings expected from the project (post development conditions considering the proposed land uses and stormwater management controls) compared with water quality loadings of the protect area as it exists in its pre -development conditions. The analysis shall be performed using methodologies approved by Federal and State water quality agencies, and must demonstrate no increase in nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorous) loadings in the post development scenario. Where treated stormwater is allowed to be directed into preserves, show how the criteria in 3.05.07 H have been met. 6. Where native vegetation is retained on site, provide a topographic map to a half foot and, where possible, provide elevations within each of the FLUCFCS Codes identified on site. For SDP or final plat construction plans, include this information on the site plans. Provide a wildlife survey for the nests of bald eagle and for listed species known to inhabit biological communities similar to those existing on site. The survey shall be conducted in accordance with the guidelines or recommendations of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Survey times may be reduced or waived where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low, as determined by the FFWCC and USFWS. Where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low, the survey time may be reduced or waived by the County Manager or designee, when the project is not reviewed or technical assistance not provided by the FFWCC and USFWS. Additional survey time may be required if listed species are discovered Provide a survey for listed plants identified in 3,04.03 9. Wildlife habitat management and monitoring plans in accordance with 3.04.00 shall be required where listed species are utilizing the site or where wildlife habitat management and monitoring plans are required by the FFWCC or USFWS. These plans shall describe how the project directs incompatible land uses away from listed species and their habitats. Identify the location of listed species nests, burrows, dens, foraging areas, and the location of any bald eagle nests or nest protection zones on the native vegetation aerial with FLUCFCS overlay for the site. Wildlife habitat management plans shall be included on the SDP or final plat construction plans. Bald eagle management plans are required for sites containing bald eagle nests or nest protection zones, copies of which shall be included on the SDP or final plat construction plans. 10. For sites or portions of sites cleared of native vegetation or in agricultural operation, provide documentation that the parcel(s) were issued a pen -nit to be cleared and are in compliance with the 25 year rezone limitation pursuant to section 10.02.06. For sites permitted to be cleared prior to July 2003, provide documentation that the parcels) are in compliance with the 10 year rezone limitation previously identified in the GM-P. Criteria defining native vegetation and determining the legality, process and criteria for clearing are found in 3.05.05, 3.05.07 and 10.02.06. 11. Identify on a current aerial the acreage, location and community types of all upland and wetland habitats on the project site, according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS), and provide a legend for each of the FLUCFCS Codes identified. Aerials and overlay information must be legible at the scale provided. Provide calculations for the acreage of native vegetation required to be retained on -site. Include the above referenced calculations and aerials on the SDP or final plat construction plans. In a separate report, demonstrate how the preserve selection criteria pursuant to 3.05,07 have been met. Where applicable, include in this report an aerial showing the project boundaries along with any undeveloped land, preserves, natural flowways or other natural land features, located on abutting properties. 12. Include on a separate site plan, the project boundary and the land use designations and overlays for the RLSA, RFMU, ST and ACSC-ST districts. Include this information on the SDP or final plat construction plans. 13. Where off -site preservation of native vegetation is proposed in lieu of on -site, demonstrate that the criteria in section 3.05.07 have been met and provide a note on the SDP or final plat construction plans indicating the type of donation (monetary payment or land donation) identified to satisfy the requirement. Include on the SDP or final plat construction plans, a location map(s) and property identification number(s) of the off -site parcel(s) if off -site donation of land is to occur. 14. Provide the results of any Environmental Assessments and/or Audits of the property, along with a narrative of the measures needed to remediate if required by FDEP. 15. Soil and/or ground water sampling shall be required at the time of first development order submittal for sites that occupy farm fields (crop fields, cattle dipping ponds, chemical mixing areas), golf courses, landfill or junkyards or for sites where hazardous products exceeding 250 gallons of liquid or 1,000 pounds of solids were stored or processed or where hazardous wastes in excess of 220 pounds per month or 1 10 gallons at any point in time were generated or stored. The amount of sampling and testing shall be determined by a registered professional with experience in the field of Environmental Site Assessment and shall at a minimum test for organochlorine pesticides (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 8081) and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) 8 metals using Florida department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) soil sampling Standard Operating Procedure (SDP) FS 3000, in areas suspected of being used for mixing and at discharge point of water management system. Sampling should occur randomly if no points of contamination are obvious. Include a background soil analysis from an undeveloped location hydraulically upgradient of the potentially contaminated site. Soil sampling should occur just below the root zone, about 6 to 12 inches below ground surface or as otherwise agreed upon with the registered professional with experience in the field of Environmental Site Assessment. Include in or with the Environmental Site Assessment, the acceptable State and Federal pollutant levels for the types of contamination found on site and indicate in the Assessment, when the contaminants are over these levels. If this analysis has been done as part of an Environmental Audit then the report shall be submitted. The County shall coordinate with the FDEP where contamination exceeding applicable FDEP standards is identified on site or where an Environmental Audit or Environmental Assessment has been submitted. 16. Shoreline development must provide an analysis demonstrating that the project will remain fully functional for its intended use after a six-inch rise in sea level. ,�G-e- 3�,P_.6. 17. Provide justification for deviations from environmental LDC provisions pursuant to GMP CCME Policy 6.1.1 (13), if requested. 18. Where applicable, provide evidence of the issuance of all applicable federal and/or state oil and gas permits for proposed oil and gas activities in Collier County. Include all state permits that comply with the requirements of Chapter 62C-25 through 62C-30, F.A.C., as those rules existed on January 13, 2005. 19. Identify any Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones (WRM-ST) within the project area and provide an analysis for how the project design avoids the most intensive land uses within the most sensitive WRM-STs and will comply with the WRM-ST pursuant to 3.06.00. Include the location of the Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones on the SDP or final plat construction plans. For land use applications such as standard and PUD rezones and CUs, provide a separate site plan or zoning map with the project boundary and Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones identified. 20. Demonstrate that the design of the proposed stormwater management system and analysis of water quality and quantity impacts fully incorporate the requirements of the Watershed Management regulations of 3.07.00. 21. For sites located in the Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern -Special Treatment overlay district (ACSC- ST), show how the project is consistent with the development standards and regulations in 4.02.14. 22. For multi -slip docking facilities with ten slips or more, and for all marina facilities, show how the project is consistent with 5.05.02. Refer to the Manatee Protection Plan for site specific requirements of the Manatee Protection Plan not included in 5.05.02. 23. For development orders within RFMU sending lands, show how the project is consistent with each of the applicable Objectives and Policies of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the GMP. 24. The County Manager or designee may require additional data or information necessary to evaluate the project's compliance with LDC and GMP requirements. (LDC 10.02.02.A.3 f) The following to be determined at preapplication meeting: (Choose those that apply) a. Provide overall description of project with respect to environmental and water management issues. b. ExpIain how project is consistent with each of the applicable objectives and policies in the CCME of the GMP. c. ExpIain how the project meets or exceeds the native vegetation preservation requirement in the CCME and LDC. d. Indicate wetlands to be impacted and the effects of the impact to their functions and how the project's design compensates for wetland impacts. e. Indicate how the project design minimizes impacts to listed species. Describe the measures that are proposed as mitigation for impacts to listed species. 25. PUD zoning and CU petitions. For PUD rezones and CU petitions, applicants shall collate and package applicable Environmental Data Submittal Requirements into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) document, prior to public hearings and after all applicable staff reviews are complete. Copies of the EIS shall be provided to the County Manager or designee prior to public hearings. 26_ Is EAC Review {by CCPC) required? 27. PUD master plan or PPLISDP site plan notes: Where preserves occur adjacent to development off site and will be used in lieu of landscape buffers, include the following condition in the environmental commitments section of the PUD document. Preserves may be used to satisfy the landscape buffer requirements after exotic vegetation removal in accordance with LDC sections 4.06.02 and 4.06.05.E.1. Supplemental plantings with native plant materials shall be in accordance with LDC section 3.05.07. 28. Additional comments 29. Stipulations for approval (Conditions) Coder County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliercountyff.gov (239) 252-2400 Pre -Application Meeting Sign -In Sheet PL# PL20220003428 - PUDA PL20220003426 - GMPA Collier County Contact Information: Name Review Discipline Phone Email Maggie Acevedo North Collier Fire 252-2309 macevedo@northcollierfire.com _l Steve Baluch Transportation Planning 252-2361 stephen.baluch@colliercount I. ov r Shar A.Beddow MSM/Deputy Fire Marshal - Greater Naples Fire 241-1422 sbeddow@gnfire.org _ Ray Bellows Zoning, Planning Manager 252-2463 raymond.bellows@colliercountyfl.gov Er Laurie Beard PU❑ Monitoring 252-5782 laurie.beard@colliercountyfl.gov Fd_�'Craig Brown Environmental Specialist 252-2548 craig.brown@colliercountyfl.gov H idi Ashton Cicko Managing Asst. County Attorney 252-8773 heidi.ashton@colliercountyfl.gov Thomas Clarke Zoning Operations Analyst 252-2584 thomas.clarke@colliercountyfl.gov Jamie Cook Development Review Director 252-6290 Jaime.cook@colliercountyfl.gov G Gabriela Castro Zoning Principal Planner 252-4211 gabriela.castro@colliercountyfl.gov I —I Maggie DeMeo North Collier Fire 252-2308 pdemeo@northcollierfire.com L'v r then 11 Utility Planning 252- �� c A(pe i @c0 �iercountyfl,gov rl Tim Finn, AICP Zoning Principal Planner 252-4312 timothy.finn@colliercountyfl.gov Sue Faulkner GMP - Comprehensive Planning 252-5715 sue.faulkner@colliercountyfl.gov LI Michael Gibbons Structural/Residential Plan Review 252-2426 michael.gibbons@col liercount I. ❑v L.1 Storm Gewirtz, P.E. Engineering Stormwater 252-2434 storm.gewirtz@colliercountyfl.gov L1 Cormac Giblin, AICP Development Review -Planning Manager 252-5095 Cormac.giblin@colliercountyfl.gov V Nancy Gundlach, AICP Zoning Principal Planner 252-2484 nancy.gundlach@colliercountyfi.gov 1_I Rachel Hansen GMP— Corn prehensive Planning 252-1142 Rachel. hansen@col Iiercoun fLgov 11 Richard Henderlong Zoning Principal Planner 252-2464 rich ard.hen derlong@colliercountyfl. ov El John Houldsworth Engineering Subdivision 252-5757 john.houidsworth@colliercountyfl.gov Alicia Humphries Right -Of -Way Permitting 252-2326 alicia.humphries@colliercountyfi.gov Anita Jenkins Planning & Zoning Director 252-5095 Anita.jenkins@colliercountyfl.gov I i Jo n Kelly Zoning Senior Planner 252-5719 john.kelly@colliercountyfl.gov 144arker Klopf GMP— Comprehensive Planning 252-2471 Parker.kiopf@colliercountyfl.gov Troy Komarowski North Collier Fire 252-2521 tkomarowski@northcoliierfire.com _I Sean Lintz North Collier Fire 597-9227 slintz@northcollierfire.com Diane Lynch Operations Analyst 252-8243 j diane.lynch @colIiercountyfLgov Thomas Mastroberto Greater Naples Fire 252-7348 thomas.mastroberto@coiliercountyfl.gov Jack McKenna, P.E. Engineering Services 252-2911 jack.mckenna@colliercountyfl.gov Updated 1/12/2021 Page 1 4 of 5 Coder Count COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliercountyfl.aov (239) 252-2400 Matt McLean, P.E. Division Director - IF, CPP & PM 252-8279 matthew.mclean@colliercountyfl.gov Michele Mosca, AICP Capital Project Planning 252-2466 michele.mosca@colliercountyfl.gov LI Richard Orth Stormwater Planning 252-S092 richard.orth@colliercountyfl.gov LJ Eric Ortman Zoning Principal Planner 252-1032 Eric. Ortrna n @ col I iercountyf Lgov u Derek Perry Assistant County Attorney 252-8066 Derek.perry@colliercountyfl.gov Brandi Pollard Utility Impart fees 252-6237 brandi.pollard@colIiercountyfl.gov IJ Todd Riggall North Collier Fire 597-9227 triggall@northcollierfire.com El Brett Rosenblum, P.E. Development Review Principal Project Manager 252-2905 brett.rosenblum@colliercountyfl.gov James Sabo, AICP GMP, Comp Planning Manager 252-2708 Michael Sawyer Transportation Planning 252-2925 _Lames.sabo@colhercountyfl.gov I Corby Schmidt, AICP Comprehensive Planning 252-2944 -michael.sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov corby.schmidt@colliercountyfl.gov LJ Linda Simmons North Collier Fire 252-2311 Linda.Simmons@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Peter Shawinsky Architectural Review 252-8523 peter.shawinsky@coliiercountyfl.gov -1 Mark Templeton Landscape Review 252-2475 mark.templeton@colliercountyfi.gov Connie Thomas Client Services Supervisor 252-6369 Consuela.thomas@coiliercountyfl.gov Jessica Velasco Client Services 252-2584 jessica.velasco@colliercountyfl.gov 1-1 Ion Walsh, P.E. Building Review 252-2962 ionathan.walsh@colliercountyfl.gov Kirsten Wilkie Environmental Review Manager 252-5518 kirsten-wilkie@colliercountyfl.gov 1 Christine Willoughby Development Review - Zoning 252-5748 christine.willoughby@colliercountyfi.gov Daniel 2unzunegui North Collier Fire 252-2310 Daniel.Zunzunegui@colliercountyfl. ov Additional Attendee Contact Information: Name Representing Phone Email r( .T -Pia �a4i� FavG 26Q- z�c �n5u,c. -'�cA) -IFW ks a✓ �w CLx""Ory CVu.,q.J ' M'Vt'L T44-FFi c P Mug Updated 1/12/2021 Page 1 5 of 5 Co,e a Participants (17) -, Find a participant thomas clarke (Host, me) Chris Scott 7-o 2--Z - 39 CorbySchmidt. MCP. Principal Planner Nancy Gundlach Principal Planner Austin Hoy,%;ell BLayman MCraig 6roa+,n a Dan Daniel7unzunegui ® Eric Mallory © EricOrtman Heidi Cicko James Sabo, Comp Planning Manager Parker Klopf. Senior Planner Ray Bellows. Zoning Manager sawyermichael aD'Naters CO ter county Growth Management Department Zoning Division Applicant/Agent may also send site plans or conceptuai plans for review in advance if desired. PL20220003428— BCHD 37698520004 37698580002 PLIDA — Nancy Gundlach PL20220003426 — Immokalee Rd Estates Commercial Subdist. GMPA - Rachel Hansen STAFF FORM FOR SUPPLEMENTAL PRE -APPLICATION MEETING INFORMATION ■ Name and Number of who submitted pre-app request Kim Davidson, Peninsula Engineering. 239-403-6700 • Agent to list for PL# Christopher Scott, AICP, Peninsula Engineering ■ Owner of property (all owners for all parcels) BCHD Partners I, LLC — Owner/Contract Purchaser of parcels 37698440003, 37698480005, 37698360002, 3769852-0004and 37698580002 John W ThemeI — Owner of parcel 37698360109 • Confirm Purpose of Pre-App: (Rezone, etc.) GMP Amendment and PUD Amendment • Please list the density request of the project if applicable and number of homes/units/offices/docks (any that apply): No changes to existing PUD entitlement of 200,000 sf of gross commercial floor area (Ord. 2021-20). • Details about Project: GMPA/PUDA to add +2.73-acre parcel (37698580002) to north of existing P U D Boundary and update the Master Concept Plan in order to reconfigure developable footprint and preserve areas. REQUIRED Supplemental information provided by: Name: Kim Davidson Title: Project Permit Coordinator Email: kdavidson@pen-eng.com Phone: 239-403-6807 Cancellation/Reschedule Requests: Contact Danny Condomina-Client Services Supervisor dann .condomina colliercount I Phone: 239-252-6866 Zoning DPAsion • 28W North Hotses hoe Drive - Naples; F"a 34104. 230-252-2400-www.cdlergw.net Coder county COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: ❑ PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code [Amendment to PUD- Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code 2900 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with an up-to-date application. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. A Model PUD Document is available online at httr).-/Iwww.colliercountvfl.gov/Hc)me/ShowDocument?id=76983. REQUIREMENTS COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Cover Letter with Narrative Statement including a detailed description of why amendment is necessary 1 ,�/ ❑ Completed Application with required attachments (download latestversion) 1 Pre -application meeting notes 1 ❑ Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 1 1 Property OwnershiP Disclosure Form Notarized and completed Covenant of Unified Control 1 Completed Addressing Checklist 1 Warranty Deed(s) 1EZ ❑ List Identifying Owner and all parties of corporation 1 ❑ Signed and sealed Boundary Survey 1 ❑ Architectural Rendering of proposed structures 1 ❑ Current Aerial Photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLU CFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. 1 [ ❑ Statement of Utility Provisions 1 ❑ Environmental Data Requirements pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 1 [� ❑ Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) packet at time of public hearings. Coordinate with project planner at time of public hearings. ❑ [] Listed or Protected Species survey, less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys. 1 ❑ Traffic Impact Study r � u. Q �� Q.� �, r No it4A T Historical Survey 1 School Impact Analysis Application, if applicable Electronic copy of all required documents 1Eff ❑ Completed Exhibits A-F (see below for additional information)' ❑ ❑ List of requested deviations from the LD�,with justificption for each (this document is separate from Exhibit E) -j ❑ ❑ U' � Otg �. Checklis"nt esnext Pag March 4, 2020 Page 9 of 11 Cofer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www. co I I i erco a nty. gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Revised Conceptual Master Site Plan 24" x 36"and One 8 %" x 11" copy ❑ ED ❑ Original PUD document/ordinance, and Master Plan 24" x 36" - Only if Amending the PUD ❑ lam' ❑ Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru & underlined 1 ❑ Copy of Official Interpretation and/or Zoning Verification 1 ❑ If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement 'The following exhibits are to be completed on a separate document and attached to the application packet: Exhibit A: List of Permitted Uses _ Exhibit B: Development Standards Exhibit C: Master Plan- See Chapter 3 E. 1. of the Administrative Code Exhibit D: Legal Description Exhibit E: List of Requested LDC Deviations and justification for each Exhibit F: List of Development Commitments If located in RFMU [Rural Fringe Mixed Use] Receiving Land Areas Pursuant to LDC Subsection 2.03.08.A.2.a.2.(b.)i.c., the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239- 690-3500 for information regarding "Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan." PLANNERS- INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart ❑ Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Johnson Utilities Engineering: E6c_F4W Parks and Recreation: Barry Williams (Director) Emergency Management: Dan Summers Immokalee water/Sewer District: ❑ City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director N I Other; �,k,,4w:7 i >~-�- - ,�,Gl� U�i►�-7 City of Naples Utilities 01 Other; 1 ASSOCIATED FEES FOR APPLICATION I Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 PA-41 PUD Rezone: $10,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre PUD to PUD Rezone: $8,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre AND Amendment: $6,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre t��mprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $2,250.00 Environmental Data Requirements -EIS Packet (submittal determined at pre -application meeting): $2,500.00 Listed or Protected Species Review (when an EIS is not required): $1,000.00 Transportation Review Fees: N� - — �.x 1 rr.� aF M`` �"'`�" T Tl s t /AL/,e t- o Methodology Review: $500.00 *Additional fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting. a Minor Study Review: $750.00 o Major Study Review $1,500.00 March 4, 2020 Page 10 of 11 Co*ier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.coliiercou nty.go� Legal Advertising Fees: ;�CIPC: $1,125.00 BCC: $500.00 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 qKSchool Concurrency Fee, if applicable: - o Mitigation Fees, if application, to he determined by the School District in coordination with the County Fire Code Plans review Fees are not listen but are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The toad Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. All checks payable to. Board of County Commissioners. As the authorized agent/appiicant for this petition, I attest that al! of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. *Additional fee for the 5' and subsequent re -submittal will be accessed at 20% of the original fee. Signature of Petitioner or Agent Printed named of signing party Date March 4, 2020 Page 11 of 11 INSTR 6281289 OR 6151 PG CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT DOC@.70 $2,522.80 REC $18 CONS $360,360.00 1982 RECORDED 7/12/2022 10:58 AM PAGES 2 AND COMPTROLLER, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA 50 .:, THIS INSTRUMENT PREPARED BY George A Alvarez, Esq Law Office of George A. Alvarez 10281 Sunset Drive, Suite 102B Miami, Florida 33173 O 305 270 1000 RETURN TO Collier Insurance Agency LLC 2600 Golden Gate Ay" Naples, FL 34105 Property Appraisers Parcel Jde. (Folio) Number 37698580002 ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDING DA WAMUNTY DEED THIS WARRANTY DEED, made e flay of July !'2022, by Lazaro A. Herrera and Elizabeth Herrera, husband and wife, whose post office addiess is661 SW 102 Avenue Road, Miami, Florida 33176, herein called the Grantors, to , BCHD Partners I, LLC, a Florida limited Parkway, Naples, Florida 34105, hereinafter (Wherever used herein the terms "Grantor" and "Gr legal representatives and assigns of individuals, and W I T N E S S E T H: That the Grantor(s), for and in v Dollars and other valuable considerations, receipt where aliens, remises, releases, conveys and confirms unto the of Florida Legal Description ny, whose post office address is 2600 Golden Gate all the parties to this instrument and the heirs, and assigns of corporations) ton: of the sum of TEN AND 00/100'S ($10 00) ibfa knowledged, hereby grants, bargains, sells, alilhiat,certam land situate in Collier County, State The South 1/2 of Tract 121, less the East 49 feet thereof, Golden Ga plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 7, pages 83 and 84, of the Public Physical Address Vacant Land, Naples, Florida 34120 All Grantors warrant that at the time of this conveyance, the subject proper Homestead within the meaning set forth in the constitution of the state of Fl part of homestead property. Grantors' residence and homestead address is: Miami, Florida 33176. TOGETHER, with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto appertaining TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the same in fee simple forever Unit No. 22, according to the nr;Collier County, Florida. Grantors' contiguous to or a Avenue Road, anywise AND, All Grantors hereby covenant with said Grantee that the Grantors are lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that Grantors have good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land, and hereby warrant the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever, and that said land is free of all encumbrances, except taxes accruing subsequent to December 31, 2021. *** OR 6151 PG 1983 *** IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Grantors have signed and sealed these presents the day and year fast above written Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of Witness 91 S C.�-- Witness #2 Signature State of Florida County of Miami -Dade both grantors) The foregoing instrument was acknow _&H-day of July, 2022, by Lazaro A [ 4are personally known to me or [ 1 [Notary Sea]] C4 - &-t5 zaro 50Herrera, Grantor �,rL Eli beth Herrera, Grantor ✓ physical presence or 11l Printed CEORGEAALVAREZNotary Public - State of Florida My Col R Commission # GG 953312 My Comm Expires Apr 5, 2024ded through National Notary Assn 9 f online presence this AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PL20220003426 and PL20220003428 1, Bradley A. Boaz, CFO of Barron Collier Mngmt, Lt_C (print name), as Authorized Agent of Creekside West, Inc., Manager (title, if applicable) of gCHD Partners I. LLC (company, if applicable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner0 applicant contract purchaserand that: 1. 1 have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. lllteh authorize Noel J. Davies. Davies Duke, PLLC and Christopher Scull, Peninsula Englneedng to act as ourlmy representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. 'Notes: ■ if the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the Corp, pres. or v. pros. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L. L. C.) or Limited Company (L.C. ), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. ■ If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner" of the named partnership. ■ If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee" • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts stated in it are true. 9I?��a�� Signatdre Date STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was acknowleged before me by means of hysical resence or ❑ online notarization this -'day of 'ice r , Zoe Z by (printed name of owner or qualifier} C le, h� �() A7_ Sucon(s) Notary Public must check applicable box: ® h pe , Are personally known to me 'a�Y ° ''• KIM D. DAVIDSON 0 Has produced a current drivers license Notary Puhll[ • State of Florida ` Commission # HH 201826 ❑ Has produced as identification. aFs� i Mk.Comm. Expires Feb 14, 2026 (�. Bonded through National Notary Assn. Notary Signatu(e, Yr �_`.-,E.iZti`� �� It r- CP108-COA-1) 0 11 5/ 155 RE1' 3/4/2020 Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 !NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the Lei C ercentaee or sucn interest: I - Name and Address I % of Ownership I If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the iercentage or stocrc ownea uy eacri: Name and Address % of Ownershie If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the ercentaee or interest: I Name and Address I % of OwnershiD I Created 9/28/2017 Page 1 of 3 Coder CouMty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.collieneov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners: Name and Address % of ownership BCHD Partners I, LLC 100% Mngr: Creekside West, Inc. 50% Gen Partner: Immokalee Retail, LLC 50olo (see attached Ownership Detail) e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners: I Name and Address I % of Ownership Date of Contract: f. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or of- g. Date subject property acquired , ui a u5L. Name and Address ❑ Leased: Term of lease years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Created 9/29/2017 Page 2 of 3 Co2 er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net Date of option: Date option terminates: Anticipated closing date: 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Any petition required to have property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form. Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest -holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition's final public hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand thatfailureto include all necessary submittal information mayresult in the delay of processing this petition. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 9/7 ,wzZ_ Agent/Owner S�t re Date Bradley A. Boaz, of Barron C�ier nagement, LLC, Authorized Agent of Creekside West, Inc., Manager of BCHD Partners I LLC, Agent/Owner Name (please print) Created 9/28/2017 Page 3 of 3 NAME BCHD Partners I, LLC OWNERSHIP DETAIL Manager: Creekside West Inc. 1998 Barron Collier III Irrevocable R Child ren's Trust Blakeslee Gable M. Wells Gable Juliet C. Sproul Family Inheritance Trust Christopher Villere Lamar Villere Mathilde V. Currence Phyllis G. Alden JenniferS. Sullivan Juliet A. Sproul Katherine G. Sproul Juliet C. Sproul General Partner: Immokalee Retail, LLC Daniel Plughes and Beth Hughes Thomas Londres Stephen Niggeman Paul Runley Daniel Brickner Joseph Dougherty o� 100.0000% 50.0000% 17.5661% 15.9049% 15.9049% 14.3830% 8.9042% 8.9042% 8.9042% 6.3452% 0.9465% 0.9465% 0.9465% 0.3435% 50.0000% 35.126% 15.905% 20.500% 20.500% 8.974% 5.000% BENEFICIARY OF TRUST Barron G. Collier 1II's descendants Juliet C. Sproul and lineal descendants °w`A LOl15-HON l llOOlO'OtlSglES VLS0lO1ldO'tl2tl'9lA'd'9'4ZLZ lOOtlNtlI1INdN0S1381tltld1 S3 ,JNR33NIJN3 31tlJN3010OLUiOtlisMZLlOVl '011'Sd3NiNVd OHDS 1%1:nSNINSd 64 si A3nans ),HVaNno9 30 dVW Z.o g� €wad &p m aka° off$ 3 o ro 5 IT o8foam°� m a�NUo- €sao p =w r�Q 'o "aoLL Prci°pwz°�- "g um3,oi ¢ =m��ww 3 $_<a„�=Est p s��°who wa „8 LL8 $Qas a pro=g y e �=p�"s se=' pb �ys�oasc`m�sp'zt m_ 3s sod :p s a r �� esper; -$p s ,_gig =�?i� g i "■ o�sama©os ,Qo�.. €.J o� ��°.opm.oH5� �/ Z. e38�o�amN`drc..€��W•"_^Woaa��ffw°o:orc?am'-amo r Lo a°u-iumWw Z.p°�:pmLL�m u 1MM )KAEEE ROAD 5-846- .. \�\womm.ewo •� (1?�.R.O.NPPER PIA'If - _ - - - - -_ _---- `-:mow �• 2 _ _ , � � Ys a 6'< orrnrcm� d° °as xsiii an°Esw ---- w Ao sn NG I- o.n_ 9t11 P32°19'23°E 330.1] - su+cEs �e3-°ao[ao a iuc a acci1ea-oR-01 rua P su. - 6o ac. nss 32°1]'42'E 603.851N�)Poa� aos.<ssas� 2 742T5.en<,1 ® S2°i]'42"E 330.28(M) 62°1]'42'E 16516 (MI S2°19'23'E 33017(PI-- _--_---------------------- } 52°19'23"E 166.09 (P)------------------- T—i------T— a.ffi - E# E" mi3 E E ?U =U '——9.6Z°ON 96, M.99.6Z°ON L �a ----------------� ------ - - (W) B9'6ZE --- f - 3N 133NIS H14 �„ �d :. H �o a _ ':'R r r �wo r � om� 3oF- w U H (d)00096 M.99.6Z°ON PENINSULA�� ENGINEERING 4 IMMOKALEE ROAD - ESTATES COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT SMALL-SCALE GMPA (PL20220003246) EXHIBIT IV.B PROPOSED SUBDISTRICT TEXT GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SUB -ELEMENT B. LAND USE DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION SECTION [Page 9] *** Text Break *** 1. ESTATES DESIGNATION *** Text Break *** B. Estates — Commercial District [Page 17] *** Text Break *** 3. Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict [Page 22] This Subdistrict is approximately 19 A 2* 21.82 acres in size and is located on the west side of Immokalee Road, north of Randall Boulevard and south of Oil Well Road, as depicted on the Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict Map. The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide a variety of commercial land uses. Development within the Subdistrict shall be subject to the following: a. All development within this Subdistrict shall be rezoned to a Planned Unit Development (PUD). b. The rezone Ordinance must include standards for a common architectural theme as well as development standards and buffers to insure compatibility with surrounding properties. c. Allowable uses shall be limited to those: Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict Page 1 1 G M PA — PL20220003246 Revised — February 15, 2023 /buu uoiaen Gate Parkway, Naples, Florida, 34105 Office 239.403.6700 Fax 239.261.1797 Fla Engineer CA 28275 Fla Landscape CA LC26000632 Fla Surveyor/Mapper LB8479 PENINSULA ENGINEERING 1. Uses permitted by right and by conditional use in the C-3, Commercial Intermediate zoning district, as listed in the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance No. 04-41. 2. Motor freight transportation and warehousing (SIC 4225, indoor air-conditioned mini- and self -storage warehousing only); 3. Carwashes provided that carwashes abutting residential zoning districts shall be subject to section 5.05.11 of this code, SIC 7542; 4. Medical and dental laboratories, SIC 8071, 8072; 5. Nursing and professional care facilities, SIC 8051, 8052, 8059. The rezone Ordinance shall limit these uses further to insure compatibility with surrounding properties. d. Development is limited to a maximum intensity of 200,099 100,000 square feet of gross commercial floor area and 130,000 square feet of indoor self -storage floor area. e. The westerly portion of this subdistrict (a.k.a. north 180 ft. of Tract 116, GGE Unit 22), which is the single western parcel immediately abutting 4th Street NE (the "Western Parcel"), shall be utilized for native preservation, stormwater management or buffer areas only. It shall not be utilized for any type of access from 4th St. NE to/from the commercial uses within the CPUD; however, the adjacent single-family homeowner to the north (a.k.a. the south half of Tract 115, Golden Gate Estates Unit 22 subdivision) may establish a driveway for the sole benefit and exclusive use of that homeowner's residential property. f. Interconnection shall be provided with properties fronting Immokalee Road located immediately to the north and south. Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict Page 1 2 G M PA — P L20220003246 Revised February 15, 2023 2600 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, Florida, 34105 Office 239.403.6700 Fax 239.261.1797 Fla Engineer CA 28275 Fla Landscape CA LC26000632 Fla Surveyor/Mapper LB8479 r N 0 F cmala,. a,e, o-n.Ar,e e.�w. a.n.xu imcanre�lu�a ww.�P�L>,4„at LEE COUNTY LINE VAND RBILT VANOERBILT x I BEACH RD -� 8 GOLDEN GATE 6LN7 U PINE R Or Ro GREEN BLVD J G PHWY 5 dNd U .91 AKE! Io A10001c Jib INTERSiM1TE 7E III111AL OGLLQI GATE N wLAND Ulm YAP n00PT[0-l9�1lN0iR )I. 1019 AM9N0E0 •,SPRIL ti, i011 11'¢ NiI 10a I.1Y1 xMm.w fie mpen. irn 1n,¢ no. x0a1�11 Avt•Notm - xl�een y iF21 te,e A.. aoalast RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES FUTURE LAND USE MAP IMu1OKALEE RD SUBJECT SITE: IMMOKALEE ROAD -ESTATES COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT 21.82-ACRES ej wL yvLLL eu LBLVD z GOLDEN GATE RLVD �pn j O W IN RSTATE70 o 0 0,6 S 2 3 »—� Mlies too R VRF R27F R7RF R•7AF PROJECT: IMMOKALEE ROAD -ESTATES COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT PENINSULA W F N G I N I LOCATION: 0.5-MILE NORTH OF RANDALL BLVD, 2600 Golden Gate Parkway WEST OF IMMOKALEE RD Na les FL 341005 CLIENT: EXHIBIT DESC: BCHD PARTNERS, LLC RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES FLUM - EXHIBIT IV.D.1 NOTES: Data obtained from Collier County Date Saved'. 9/fi/2922 P'.-ti. P.1e ts-BGHD-994\ 2 B-D-1-PUDA GMPkD.a ,, a-GIS�2 22-99-9fi GG FLl1M.mx 0 33rd AVE NE c"eekdh cT � Oil Well R IMMOKALEE ROAD - ESTATES �� = 1>1 m Grove DR COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT eti °h5 �D Sr 41 z Sapling iv � coq, s DR G� tt o o� ,Mu cor DR Orange Tree BLVD Valencia Lakes UJI z CIR z � Vf ~ c N 47 o Inlet �O 0 Cove Grove OR LN E oO �� c� 0 oav 25th e 0?C2 P 25th AVE NE AVE NE 0 Bergamot Y V j Randall BLVD 1 W z � Legend N 00 IMMOKALEE RD ESTATES COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT. 21.82-ACRES 0 500 1,000 Fee PROJECT: CLIENT: EXHIBIT DESC: P E IV I fV S U LA i,,,, IMMOKALEE RD ESTATES BCHD PARTNERS, LLC EXHIBIT IV.D.2-INSET MAP NOTES: ENGINEERING ': COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT 2600 Golden Gate Parkway Na �e5. FL 341006 P:Wctiv Data savae: srsrzazz Pro'ects\P-BCH D-000\002 BCHD-1-PUDA GMPA\D-1 s-GIs�2022-0830—disMc[Inse[Ma .m of LLI 't4_ O LL m F a o co ur , W:. ' m 0O LU ui K _ s ¢ ui ui Y ! .€•jam y,,`�•�1 + fi M1 / Q m ,., ►. u, o af.%12� w m OA 4�� .� _ .� � F a W Z V VI w�- z 3N 1S4�V--me V Ir F `FiP k I m d 1.1 Ea' O V 7-7 O O v Z O 3 0 CY F C • �j Z J z C I a w o Z 0 0 3 v~i pa-aalelowwl � o 3N 1S PUZ I I I n I I' z V� F n uos i N P 19 uosl,M 5 �, N P 19- LM ¢< z c ° o� a z x J Z- ar aO-i w a•OC ��` � � w a f6 W,i Z z N 0 J Z LH E _ a O, Z t0¢7 Z W' (� ' N 0 a CD LL o W f m J - _ •ems /(�, 1 L�/ra Of LU cn w CD W W J � t a 60 li4A 1 - i Ez m W N Z I i 1 cc . AY' 10-A Fl- rV, ' - Ircl k . Ar - 33b = u v u m J Z r� CW CLC m > N O W a Q 0' N p^19 u0SIIM -, N-p^I9 uosllM o Q z z z � O o J u ,� O F w ^7 L a r1 ,NY Q� a PaZ Z 3 O m N - w Y w W a W Z C z vl Z Z MN-1S 43b Q n w �- D w o W N w N E - a N w N y O =L O ' U n! � H (n 3 � a 00 C (n N W a Q O Q O C) N W W O U W U W W 0 ' ' (n W W C7 a O s 0 tY CC z C Q a w LL1 Q a 0 LL 7 m O z � o O N CO• X W Z W z W c.� Q W D ---------� oc m a ~ � J _ ILLIz W C7 a Q o c = I g a m I p J ? W I I Q w= u CO ' � u � a m v a V G J CW C co Q Q N W Q W O Y N W z O W O Z _ H N H Y O p p U N W O u W 0 3 Z_ U cn W a 1�° O- o w 3 4ilt. tF,#•G .r �! 3..'.C+ Z J Qa ti _4, Al o o ,•.PCs-=-z ..�!M.t s,r'x w�firIl _ o a a) / !: LU LU - _04 ��ana 2 N / baA CD CD _ \ \�)[ \ - - ! < LY (of mo) ( o \ \ \ \ \ \ \ r _ 0 _ _ QP k / u I I E ) #,_Q \ WAY tCu F" ^ °3 » N 34e, > ƒ� -IOA9 g _ ,>w�e4L%5�o asea-j 10) ■ k % 2 &b § Co �# $�0 % \ } 3NIS, u u Co =z % Ln§ B MIS@z 4 Q z » ■ Co \ N \ § zS K \) { j k Namsuosm [ 2 k 2 \ ) q §2 e�® ) 2k ()( ) � MN IS @z t 2 § e r k z / §§ R ) u a7 2 z !g / 2 / /| MN34 § w . 0. PEN INS UTA7 , ENGINEERING I M M O KALE E ROAD - ESTATES COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT GMPA EXHIBIT V.C: LISTED SPECIES SURVEY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA PREPARED BY: PENINSULA ENGINEERING 2600 GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY NAPLES, FL 34105 MAY 2020 REVISED OCTOBER 2020 REVISED SEPTEMBER 2022 BRUCE LAYMAN, SPWS PENINSULA{- ENGINEERING BCHD1 CPUD AMENDMENT LISTED SPECIES SURVEY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................................... 3 2. PROJECT METHODOLOGY.....................................................................................................................3 2.1. Listed Wildlife Survey....................................................................................................................3 2.2. Listed Plant Survey........................................................................................................................4 2.3. Habitat/Wetland Mapping............................................................................................................4 3. SURVEY RESULTS...................................................................................................................................5 3.1. Listed Wildlife Species Observed/Identified On Site..................................................................... 5 3.2. Listed Wildlife Species Not Observed On -Site But With Potential to Occur On Site .................... 5 3.3. Listed Plant Species Observed On Site..........................................................................................7 3.4. Habitat/Wetland Mapping —Native Preserve............................................................................... 7 4. SUMMARY.............................................................................................................................................8 5. REFERENCES CITED................................................................................................................................ 9 TABLES Table 1 - Listed Species and Vegetation Survey Details ................................................... Table 2 - Listed Plant and Wildlife Species Observed...................................................... Table 3 - Non -listed Wildlife Species Observed............................................................... Table 4 - Estimated Probability of Occurrence of Non -Observed Listed Faunal Species Table 5 - Estimated Probability of Occurrence of Non -Observed Listed Floral Species.. Table 6A - Existing Vegetative Associations and Land Uses Within CPUD ...................... Table 6B - Existing Vegetative Associations and Land Uses Within Addition .................. APPENDICES Appendix A - Existing Vegetation Association & Land Use Descriptions FIGURES Figure 1— Existing Conditions Figure 2 — Bear Incident Location Map 10 10 11 11 12 12 12 2 P:\Active_P roj ects\P-BCH D-004\002_BCH D-1-PU DA_G M PA\Su bm itta Is\Co u my PENINSULA+, ENGINEERING 13CHD1 CPUD AMENDMENT LISTED SPECIES SURVEY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA 1. INTRODUCTION Peninsula Engineering (PE) entered into an agreement with BCHD Partners I LLC (BCHD) to provide environmental services associated with a 19.13-acre parcel known as BCHD1 CPUD (f.k.a. Immokalee Road —Estates Commercial Subdistrict). The rezoning effort resulted in Ordinance 2021-20 which was adopted on April 27, 2021. Subsequently, BCHD expanded the subject property by acquiring the adjacent 2.69-acre parcel to the north (i.e., the Addition). This Environmental Data report includes the data supporting the 19.13-acre property that resulted in Ordinance 2021-20, as well as the data associated with the addition of the 2.69 acres and the associated land plan, as revised. Data associated with the Addition will be so notes in the report. The Environmental Data author credentials include full-time employment as an Environmental Consultant/Ecologist in Lee and Collier Counties since 1992. The Addition is located in Section 22; Township 48 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. The parcel is bordered on the north by undeveloped land, on the east Immokalee Road and high -density residential development, on the west by estate -style residential development, and on the south by approved BCHD1 CPUD. The Addition parcel is entirely forested, contains low to moderate exotic vegetation coverage. Historical hydrology has been adversely affected by regional development. The protected species surveys were conducted, and the results summarized herein, to support local, state, and federal environmental permitting. 2. PROJECT METHODOLOGY Bruce Layman, Ecologist with PE, conducted listed species surveys consistent Collier County Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) Objective 7.1 and its implementing policies and with Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission standards on the CUPID property during September 2018. The dates, times and weather conditions are summarized in Table 1. Due to the passage of 12 months, the survey on the CPUD property was updated in September 2019, and again in September 2021, to determine whether site conditions remained consistent with those observed in September 2018. A similar listed species survey was conducted on the Addition parcel during August 2022. The following information describes the methodologies employed: 2.1. Listed Wildlife Survey Prior to conducting the listed species surveys, color aerial imagery and FLUCCS mapping from prior environmental reconnaissance were reviewed to anticipate which habitats may be present. Various publications and databases were also reviewed to identify listed plant and wildlife species that are regionally present and that could occur and those habitat types. Based on the habitat types identified on site, a preliminary list of state and federal listed flora and fauna that could occur on the project site was generated to help focus survey effort. FWC's Florida's Endangered and Threatened Species (FWC, 2016) was used to determine the "listed" state and federal status designation of wildlife species. The 2018, 2019, 2021 and 2022 field surveys consisted of one ecologist performing east/west parallel meandering pedestrian transects spaced approximately 50 to 120 feet on center based on habitat type and visibility limits. These transects are illustrated on Figure 1 entitled Existing Conditions. Additional wandering transects were conducted on successive days, and during the species survey updates, to augment survey coverage and increase the opportunity to observe wildlife. Wandering transects are not shown. The field observer was equipped with a compass, 3 P:\Active_P roj ects\P-BCH D-004\002_BCH D-1-PU DA_G M PA\Su bm itta Is\Co u my PENINSULA+, ENGINEERING BCHD1 CPUD AMENDMENT LISTED SPECIES SURVEY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA GPS, color aerial, wildlife and plant identification books, binoculars, and a field notebook. During pedestrian transects, the ecologist periodically stopped, looked for wildlife, signs of wildlife, and listened for wildlife vocalizations. Due to habitats present and likelihood of occurrence (not to the exclusion of other potential listed species), the ecologist specifically surveyed for the potential presence of the Eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon corais couperi), gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus), Big Cypress fox squirrel (Sciurus niger avicennia), and trees containing cavities that could have been potentially created by the red -cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis) or could be used by the Florida bonneted bat (Eumops floridanus; FBB) for roosting. Given the nature of the parcel, the ecologist is anticipated to have directly observed greater than 70% of the parcel. If observed, the approximate location of observed listed wildlife species and their numbers were mapped on an aerial and recorded in a field notebook. The locations of fixed resources, such as gopher tortoise burrows or cavity trees were recorded using hand-held GPS and flagged with high -visibility survey ribbon. Non -listed wildlife species were recorded daily. 2.2. Listed Plant Survey Over the course of conducting surveys for listed wildlife, the PE ecologist searched for plants listed by the Florida Department of Agriculture (FDA) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS). These agencies have categorized the various plant species based upon their relative abundance in natural communities. Those categorizations include "Endangered", "Threatened", and "Commercially Exploited". The protection afforded plants listed solely by FDA entails restrictions on harvesting or destroying plants found on private lands of another, or public lands, without permission and/or a permit from FDA. Unless the sale of plants is involved, there are no state restrictions for landowners to impact such plants. These provisions are found in Section 581.185, FDA under State law. The Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) Section 3.04.03 — Requirements for Protected Plants identifies 5 specific plant species as "rare" and 5 additional epiphytic plant species as "less rare". The named plants are required to be protected in accordance with Section 3.04.03 conditions. 2.3. Habitat/Wetland Mapping The habitat and wetland survey included the preparation of a Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCCS) map delineating the major vegetation communities and land uses present on the project site. A FLUCCS Map for the BCHD1 project site and the Addition is provided as Figure 1 entitled Existing Conditions. The methods and class descriptions found in the FLUCCS manual (FDOT, 1999) were followed when delineating and assigning areas to an appropriate FLUCCS category (class) or "codes". Preliminary wetland limits were mapped using the standard state and federal wetland delineation methodologies and direct field observations and aerial photo interpretation. Color aerial photos were plotted at 1" = 50' scale and were used in the field to map the vegetative communities on the site. 4 P:\Active_P roj ects\P-BCH D-004\002_BCH D-1-PU DA_G M PA\Su bm itta Is\Co u my PENINSULA+, ENGINEERING BCHD1 CPUD AMENDMENT LISTED SPECIES SURVEY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA An important factor in mapping vegetative associations and local habitats is the invasion by the exotic plant species, such as melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenervia), Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius), and earleaf acacia (Acacia auriculiformis). Four levels of exotic density are typically recognized. Code modifiers may be appended to the base FLUCCS code to indicate the approximate density of exotic vegetation in the canopy or understory, as follows: EO = Exotics <10% E1 = Exotics 10-24% E2 = Exotics 25-49% E3 = Exotics 50-75% E4 = Exotics 75<% Wet season high water (WSHW) elevation was estimated in the BCHD1 CPUD wetland using hydrobiological indicators including stain lines and moss collars. Triplicate WSHW elevations were marked in the field, and they were surveyed, and the average WSHW elevation was 13.41' NAVD. 3. SURVEYRESULTS 3.1. Listed Wildlife Species Observed/Identified On Site No state -listed or federally listed wildlife species were observed on site during the 2018 listed species survey on the BCHD1 CPUD property. Observations made during the September 2019 and 2021 listed species survey updates reflect that site conditions had not changed from those observed in 2018. Similarly, no state -listed or federally listed wildlife species were observed on the Addition property during the 2022 listed species survey. With no listed species observed during these surveys, the proposed PUD Amendment is consistent with CCME Policy 7.1. Neither parcel contained US Fish and Wildlife Service -designated listed species critical habitat. All non -listed wildlife species, either directly observed or audibly detected on site during any of the surveys, are listed in Table 3. Signs observed in the field (scat, clawed trees), regional bear incident data from FWC (Figure 2), photographic eyewitness accounts of an adult bear on adjacent property from neighbors, and direct on -site observation of a juvenile bear, confirm that bears (Ursus americanus floridanus) occasionally occur on site. Though the black bear is no longer listed as protected, the FWC is likely to suggest conservation measures, during the state Environmental Resource Permitting Process, to protect the species. 3.2. Listed Wildlife Species Not Observed But With Potential to Occur On Site The following is a discussion of listed wildlife species that were not observed during either survey, but which are considered to have potential to occur due to the presence of suitable habitat, confirmed sightings in the region, or the parcel's being located within the consultation area for a given species. Species with greater than zero potential to occur on site are summarized in Table 4. Both parcels fall within the consultation areas of both the Florida scrub jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens coerulescens) and the snail kite (Rostrhamus sociabilis). Since neither parcel contains habitat that is reasonably suitable for use by either species, these are not considered potential users of the site. P:\Active_P roj ects\P-BCH D-004\002_BCH D-1-PU DA_G M PA\Su bm itta Is\Co u my PEN INSUJLA ENGINEERINGA BCHD1 CPUD AMENDMENT LISTED SPECIES SURVEY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA The gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) is listed as Threatened by the FWC and it is not listed by FWS. Given the presence of pine flatwoods on site, this species was considered to be potentially present. No signs of the species (i.e., burrows, scat) were observed on either parcel during the listed species surveys and they are no longer considered a candidate to occur on site. The Big Cypress fox squirrel (Sciurus niger avicennia; BCFS) is listed as Threatened by FWC and its distribution is believed to be limited to an area south of the Caloosahatchee River and west to the Everglades. The BUS is usually associated with FLUCCS codes 411, 621, and 624 and prefers habitats with open park -like mid -story and groundcover strata. Such areas on site are small and isolated. Since site conditions are not conducive to use by this species and no evidence of the BUS (i.e., direct sightings, nests, day beds, etc.) was observed on site during any of the surveys, it is anticipated that the potential for this species to occur on either parcel is near zero. Due to the presence of on -site wetlands, a suite of listed wading birds could potentially use the site to forage. It includes the wood stork (Mycteria americana), roseate spoonbill (Platalea ajaja), and reddish egret (Egretta rufescens). These species could opportunistically forage in the wetland; however, the existing density of midstory and groundcover vegetation make it less likely. No wading bird rookeries were observed on either site, nor are any known to be on adjacent properties. The site falls within the core foraging area (18.6 miles) of at least three (3) wood stork colonies. The red -cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis; RCW) is listed as Endangered by FWS and both parcels are located on the periphery of the FWS consultation area for this species. No RCW cavity trees were observed on either site during the listed species surveys, nor were any RCW vocalizations detected. Though the slash pine trees could be used for foraging if an RCW clan was regionally present, RCW clans typically require hundreds of contiguous acres of pine forest for foraging and nesting. With the nearest RCW occurrence record being 7 — 9 miles southwest of the project site in proximity to City Gate (per the FWC RCW occurrence data base), it appears that there is little reasonable potential for the RCW to use the pine flatwood habitat present on either site. The Florida panther (Fells concolor coryi) is listed as Endangered by FWS and both parcels fall within Secondary panther habitat. Per the FWC data base, a single panther telemetry point was located 0.2 miles north of the project site in 2014. It was associated with a 2.5-year-old male that subsequently died that year several miles to the south of unknown causes. Later, in 2018, cat #251 recorded eight (8) points over a two -month period ranging between 0.51 and 0.98 miles to the south of the project in the residential estate properties. The developed nature of the region and the general lack of regular use of the region by collared cats suggests that the project site is not likely part of a panther travel corridor or an active home range for collared panthers. The Florida bonneted bat (Eumops floridanus; FBB) is listed as Endangered by FWS and the site falls within the FWS consultation area for this species. There is relatively little known about the life -history needs of the species; however, it has been suggested in the literature that roosts may be a limiting resource for this bat. As such, the ecologist specifically searched for trees with cavities that could potentially be used for roosting by the FBB. In 2018, the site contained numerous pines that had recently died, presumably due to stress resulting from Hurricane Irma and subsequent beetle infestation. However, few contained woodpecker cavities and the cavities that were present were either shallow or of small diameter. None exhibited signs of use by bats such as smudging, audible chatter, or the presence of guano. Many of the dead pined observed in 2018 had fallen by September 2021. P:\Active_P roj ects\P-BCH D-004\002_BCH D-1-PU DA_G M PA\Su bm itta Is\Co u my PEN INSUJLA ENGINEERINGA BCHD1 CPUD AMENDMENT LISTED SPECIES SURVEY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA A tree cavity survey was conducted on the CPUD parcel in October 2021. Seven trees with cavities were documented and their contents were observed via wireless video camera. No bats were observed occupying the cavities. Those cavities that remained intact in August 29022 were viewed, again, using a wireless video camera. Again, no bats were observed roosting in the cavities. Additionally, a cavity tree survey was conducted in August 2022 in the Addition parcel. No trees with cavities were observed. Given the results of the multiple surveys on both properties, it appears unlikely that bonneted bats roost on either parcel. Given that the FBB is known to travel great distances to forage, and given the proximity of the site to large forested areas to the north that may contain natural roosts, it is assumed that FBB's roosting regionally would have the potential to commute or forage over the parcel. The Eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon corais couperi) is listed as Endangered by FWS. Indigo snakes inhabit pine forests, hardwood hammocks, scrub and other uplands. They also rely heavily on a variety of wetland habitats for feeding and temperature regulation needs. Though none were observed on site, it is typically assumed by FWS that there is potential for this species to be present. Adhering to the FWS standard Eastern Indigo Snake Protection Precautions may be proposed during State 404 permitting as a means to sufficiently protect the species. Though the bald eagle (Holiaeetus leucocephalus) is not state or federally listed, it is protected by the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. No eagle nest was observed on either site. Per the FWC Eagle Nest Locator website, https://public.myfwc.com/FWRI/EagleNests/ nestlocator.aspx), the nearest known eagle nest (nest C0103) is located approximately 4.0 miles east-northeast of the parcels. The site is located well beyond the protection zones of that nest. 3.3. Listed Plant Species Observed On Site Three (3) species of listed plants (per the FDA list) were observed on site during the CPUD field survey. The species observed were the stiff -leafed wild pine (Tillandsia fasciculata), Northern needleleaf (Tillandsia balbisiana), and the butterfly orchid (Encyclia tampensis). Both Tillandsia species were also observed within the Addition parcel. All three are listed as "less rare" by Collier County and all three are represented in the proposed on -site preserve. The Tillandsia species were relatively abundant; however, the butterfly orchid was limited to a few small plants. They were typically located on pine and cypress trees. No plant species listed by FWS were observed during the field surveys. The listed plant species observed, and their state and federal listing status, are provided in Table 2. 3.4. Habitat/Wetland Mapping — Native Preserve Natural areas of the project site are comprised primarily of pine flatwood, cypress, and pine - cypress -cabbage palm communities. All three communities on site fit Collier County's definition of native habitat. Based upon the proposed commercial use of the property, a minimum of 15% of the existing native vegetation (i.e., 3.26 acres) would need to be preserved to be consistent with CCME Policy 6.1.1 and Collier County Land Development Code requirement. The location and composition of the preserve associated with the approved CPUD was established per hierarchy criterion 3.05.07(A)(4)(a) given the potential use of the cypress wetland by listed species. Since the CPUDA is adding land of the same habitat composition and function, reconfiguration of the previously -approved preserve is consistent with the LDCs preserve hierarchy criteria. Per the Master Plan provided in support of the proposed County CPUDA, a minimum of 3.26 acres of native habitat are proposed to be preserved on site and the project is consistent with CCME Policy 6.1.1. The FLUCCS code for each community along with a brief description and acreage are P:\Active_P roj ects\P-BCH D-004\002_BCH D-1-PU DA_G M PA\Su bm itta Is\Co u my PENINSULA+, ENGINEERING BCHD1 CPUD AMENDMENT LISTED SPECIES SURVEY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA provided in Tables 6A and 6B and a detailed description of each FLUCCS code is provided in AppendixA. Historic on -site hydrology appears to be adversely affected as a result of surrounding development. Based upon current field conditions, and application of state wetland delineation methodologies, there are 3.85 acres of jurisdictional wetlands on the CPUD parcel, and it is estimated that there are 1.21 acres on the Addition parcel. The 1.21-acre area, mapped as FLUCCS 621-Cypress on the Existing Conditions figure, has not been verified by either the South Florida Water Management District or the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. Verification will take place during state and federal environmental permit review. Based upon hydrobiological indicators, WSHW elevation was determined to be 13.41' NAVD. 4. SUMMARY Results of the surveys on both the CPUD and the Addition parcels reflect a lack of state or federally listed wildlife and a lack of federally listed plant species. The protection afforded by the state for the FDA -listed stiff -leaved wild pine, Northern needleleaf, and butterfly orchid observed on site entails restrictions on harvesting or destroying plants found on private lands of another, or public lands, without permission and/or a permit from FDA. There are no state restrictions for landowners unless the sale of plants is involved. Collier County identifies these three species as "less rare" and has requirements for their protection. However, since all three are represented within the on -site preserve, relocation of specimens out of harm's way is not required. It will likely be assumed by FWS during the federal permitting process that there is potential for the Eastern indigo snake to occur on both parcels. Similarly, based upon current FWS procedure, it will also likely be assumed by FWS that the project may affect the bonneted bat since the project is over 5 acres in size and more than one acre of bonneted bat habitat will be adversely affected. Adhering to the FWS standard Eastern Indigo Snake Protection Precautions and providing project -specific data documenting the lack of on -site bonneted bat roosting activity are likely to sufficiently address FWS's concerns in order to sufficiently protect both species. Though not listed by either FWC or FWS, the black bear may come up as a point of discussion during the state Environmental Resource Permitting process. Measures to educate the end user of the land, and protection of the bear during and after construction, are likely to be addressed at that time. The current assessment of the Addition parcel anticipates that there are approximately 1.21 acres of state and federal jurisdictional wetlands within its 2.69 acres. The wetlands will be addressed during the state and federal environmental permitting processes. Based upon a proposed commercial land use and its required 15% preservation of native vegetation, a minimum of 3.26 acres of native preserve will need to be identified and preserved as part of the CPUDA during Collier County development review. 8 P:\Active_P roj ects\P-BCH D-004\002_BCH D-1-PU DA_G M PA\Su bm itta Is\Co u my PENINSULA+, ENGINEERING BCHD1 CPUD AMENDMENT LISTED SPECIES SURVEY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA 5. REFERENCESCITED Florida Department of Transportation. 1999. Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System. Procedure No. 550-010-001-a. Third Edition. Tallahassee, Florida. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. 2013. Florida's Endangered and Threatened Species, Official List. Tallahassee, Florida. Weaver, R.E. and P.J. Anderson. 2010. Notes on Florida's Endangered and Threatened Plants, Contribution No. 38, 5th edition. 9 P:\Active_P roj ects\P-BCH D-004\002_BCH D-1-PU DA_G M PA\Su bm itta Is\Co u my PENINSULA7 FNGINFFRING BCHD1 CPUD AMENDMENT LISTED SPECIES SURVEY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA TABLES P:\Active_P roj ects\P-BCH D-004\002_BCH D-1-PU DA_G M PA\Su bm itta Is\Co u my PENINSULA -. ENGINEERING"+,. BCHD1 CPUD AMENDMENT LISTED SPECIES SURVEY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA Table 1: Listed Species and Vegetation Survey Details Ecologist Date Time of Day Weather Field Hours Bruce Layman 9/12/18 7:45 a.m. -1:30 p.m. 76°, partly cloudy, wind 0 mph 5.75 Bruce Layman 9/13/18 7:15 a.m. -10:00 a.m. 78% partly cloudy, wind 0 mph 2.75 Bruce Layman 9/14/18 7:15 a.m. - 10:00 a.m. 74°, partly cloudy, wind 0 mph 2.75 Bruce Layman 9/17/18 4:00 p.m. - 6:30 p.m. 94°, partly cloudy, wind 0 mph 2.50 Bruce Layman 9/19/18 6:00 p.m. - 8:00 p.m. 92°, clear, wind 0 mph 2.00 Bruce Layman 9/05/19 8:00 a.m. — 2:30 p.m. 77°, clear, wind 0 mph 6.50 Bruce Layman 9/17/21 9:30 a.m. —4:00 p.m. 82% partly cloudy, south wind 5 mph 6.5 Bruce Layman 8/17/22 9:00 a.m. —11:00 a.m. 81% partly cloudy, calm 2.0 Total Hours 30.75 Table 2: Listed Plant and Wildlife Species Observed Common Name Scientific Name Habitat Where Observed By FLUCCS FWC status FWS Status FDA Status PLANTS Stiff -leaved wild -pine Tillandsia fasciculata 411, 624D, 621 N/A NL E Butterfly orchid Encyclia tamepensis 411 N/A NL CE Northern needleleaf Tillandsia balbisiono 624D N/A NL T WILDLIFE Florida black bear* Ursus americanus floridanus 411, 624D, 621 NL NL N/A FDA = Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services FWC = Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission FWS = United States Fish &Wildlife Service CE = Commercially Exploited T = Threatened E = Endangered NL = Not Listed N/A = Not Applicable * = Not listed by FWC or FWS, but protection measures typical 10 P:\Active_P rojects\P-BCH D-004\002_BCH D-1-PU DA_G M PA\Su bmitta Is\Cou my PENINSULA -. ENGINEERING"+,. BCHD1 CPUD AMENDMENT LISTED SPECIES SURVEY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA Table 3: Non -listed Wildlife Species Observed Common Name Scientific Name BIRDS Northern cardinal Cardinalis cardinalis Blue -gray gnatcatcher Polioptila caerulea Red -bellied woodpecker Centurus carolinus Blue jay Cyanocitta cristata Mourning dove Zenaida macroura Barred owl Strix varia Pileated woodpecker Dryocopus pileatus AMPHIBIANS & REPTILES Cuban anole Anolis s. sagrei Southern black racer Coluber constrictor Water moccasin Agkistrodon piscivorus MAMMALS Nine -banded armadillo* Dasypus novemcinctus Eastern gray squirrel Sciurus carolinensis Florida black bear* Ursus americanus floridanus Eastern cottontail Sylvilagus floridanus * Species not directly observed. Signs of species presence observed (e.g., burrow, tracks, scat, remains, etc.) Table 4: Estimated Probability of Occurrence of Non -Observed Listed Faunal Species StatEstimated Occurrence* us Common Name Scientific Name (FWC/FWS) Probable Possible Unlikely Listed wading birds Red -cockaded woodpecker Florida panther Big Cypress fox squirrel Florida bonneted bat Eastern indigo snake various Picoides borealis Felis concolor coryi Sciurus niger avicennia Eumops floridanus corais cou FWC = Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission FWS = United States Fish and Wildlife Service FDA = Food and Drug Administration SSC = Species of Special Concern T =Threatened E = Endangered C = Commercially Exploited NL = Not listed BIRDS E/E MAMMALS E/E T/NL E/E REPTILES T/T Probable Occurrence = >50% estimated chance of occurrence on site. Possible Occurrence = <50% estimated chance of occurrence on site. Unlikely Occurrence = <5% estimated chance of occurrence on site. X X X X X X Habitat by FLUCCS 621 411 411, 621, 624D 411, 621, 624D 411, 621, 624D 411, 621, 624D 11 P:\Active_P rojects\P-BCH D-004\002_BCH D-1-PU DA_G M PA\Su bmitta Is\Cou my PENINSULA -. ENGINEERING"+,. BCHD1 CPUD AMENDMENT LISTED SPECIES SURVEY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA Table 5: Estimated Probability of Occurrence of Non -Observed Listed Floral Species Status Estimated Occurrence* Common Name Scientific Name (FDA/FWS) Probable Possible Unlikely Giant wild pine Tillandsia utriculata E/NL X FWC = Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission FWS = United States Fish and Wildlife Service FDA = Food and Drug Administration SSC = Species of Special Concern T =Threatened E = Endangered C = Commercially Exploited NL = Not listed * Probable Occurrence = >50% estimated chance of occurrence on site. Possible Occurrence = <50% estimated chance of occurrence on site. Unlikely Occurrence = <5% estimated chance of occurrence on site. ** There is potential for an eagle to construct a nest on site at a later date, though the probability is low. Table 6A: Existing Vegetative Associations and Land Uses Within CPUD FLUCCS CODE FLUCCS DESCRIPTION East Parcel Acres 411 Pine Flatwoods, Palmetto understory 8.84 621 Cypress 3.85 624D Pine -Cypress -Cabbage Palm, Drained 6.32 814 Roads and Highways 0.12 TOTAL 19.13 Table 613: Existing Vegetative Associations and Land Uses Within Addition East Parcel FLUCCS CODE FLUCCS DESCRIPTION Acres 411 Pine Flatwoods, Palmetto understory 0.98 621 Cypress 1.21 624D Pine -Cypress -Cabbage Palm, Drained 0.50 nTAI 2.69 abitat by FLUCCS 621, 624D 12 P:\Active_P rojects\P-BCH D-004\002_BCH D-1-PU DA_G M PA\Su bmitta Is\Cou my PENINSULA7 FNGINFFRING BCHD1 CPUD AMENDMENT LISTED SPECIES SURVEY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA APPENDIX A Existing Vegetative Association & Land Use Descriptions 13 P:\Active_P roj ects\P-BCH D-004\002_BCH D-1-PU DA_G M PA\Su bm itta Is\Co u my PENINSULA ENGINEERING BCHD1 CPUD AMENDMENT LISTED SPECIES SURVEY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA Existing Vegetative Association & Land Use Detailed Descriptions Pine Flatwoods — Palmetto Understory (FLUCCS 411) — This community is dominated in the canopy by slash pine (Pinus elliotti), with a minor component of cabbage palm (Saba) palmetto) and cypress (Taxodium distichum). The midstory includes live oak (Quercus virginiana), dahoon holly (Ilex cassine), and stunted cypress. Saw palmetto (Serenoa repens) is scattered and represents a dominant species in the groundcover. Other species include beautyberry (Callicarpa americana), Caesarweed (Urena lobata), love vine (Cassytha filiformis), and bracken fern (Pteridium aquilinum). Vines are locally abundant and include muscadine grape (Vitis rotundifolia), poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans), and cat briar (Smilax rotundifolia). Cypress (FLUCCS 621) - This community is dominated in the canopy by cypress, with red maple (Acer rubrum), cabbage palms, and melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenervia) as subdominants. The midstory is relatively open and includes red maple, cocoplum (Chrysobalanus icaco), strangler fig (Ficus aurea), max myrtle (Morelia cerifera), and dahoon holly. Groundcover is dominated by locally abundant swamp fern (Blechnum serrulatum) with pockets of maidencane (Panicum hemitomon) and beak -rush (Rhynchospora microcarpa). Pine — Cypress — Cabbage Palm - Drained (FLUCCS 624D) - This community is dominated in the canopy by slash pine, cabbage palm, ear -leaf acacia (Acacia auriculiformis), and minor cypress. The midstory ranges from relatively open to dense with slash pine, earleaf acacia, cocoplum, cypress, and laurel oak (Quercus laurifolia) dominating. Groundcover includes Caesarweed, cocoplum, beautyberry, swamp fern and chain fern (Woodwardia spp.). Vines are locally abundant and include muscadine grape and cat briar. Roads and Highways (FLUCCS 814) — This represents the right of way of 4th Street NE including driving surface and maintained shoulders. 14 P:\Active_P roj ects\P-BCH D-004\002_BCH D-1-PU DA_G M PA\Su bm itta Is\Co u my PENINSULA ENGINEERING BCHD1 CPUD AMENDMENT LISTED SPECIES SURVEY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA FIGURE 1 Existing Conditions 15 P:\Active_P roj ects\P-BCH D-004\002_BCH D-1-PU DA_G M PA\Su bm itta Is\Co u my PENINSULA ENGINEERING BCHD1 CPUD AMENDMENT LISTED SPECIES SURVEY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA t ME -- - - - - - - rr-r-rLrrw_-r•r+� 11 627 624D r-------- -------------------- - ....... 1 N rr r__wr _`� - ...._—. as -r .�� y ■ r r r r r ----- --. 11 621 Imo- - rr - -•--- �� I r .--r w-----w•tiYrr- — -.--. .' --- 1 \ a � r •----rr—r---.......... --- ------- --i i e i-r _-r-----------------r------r - w—r ---e pp ll PROJECT w I _ BOUNDARY (TYP) - 1 � 624D i --------------r-----arrr �.--rr----rrr'�-1• t r { L 1 � r � r � r � r � � I ---r--------r - +- .-.n --- rrrrf LEGEND BCHD1 CPVD BO17#1DARY T� T� BCH01 CPUD AMENDIA ENT BOUNDARY FLUCC3 LIMITS ----. MEAKDF;RVC; PEDESTRIAN TRASECT 4APPROK.I PRElW,rNARY WETLANDS (NOT AGENCY REVIEWED OR APPROVED) AGENCY APPROVED WETLAND LIMES FLUCC5 ARCODE DESCRIPTION EA 411' PINE FLATWDODS 9 64 82t' CYPRESS 3 BS B240`' PFNE-�:YPRESS-CADRAGE PALM. 6 32 DISTURBEID 814 ROADS AND HIGHWAYS 0.12 SUBTOTAL SCHOI CPLID 19.13 'NATIVE RABITAT PER COWER COUNTY FLUCC AREA DESCRIPTION CODE (AC) 411' PINE FLATWOODS 0.06 621' CYPRESS t.21 624D' PINE-CYPRESSC-A9BAGE PALM. 050 DISTURRED 5LIEITCITALBCHDI CPIJDAMENDIVENT 2.69 'NATVE I"ITATPER COILJER COIJNT MRO&C'T TITLE ovWNMw LfENTIG0N9l1LTmr: SEC IMMOKALEE I E}CISTING ENGJNEERLNG ROAD - .::. ESTATES COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT CONDITIONS - BCHD PARTNERS WETLAND AND 1, L.C. FLUCCS C-1 01 03 or 1 16 P:\Active_P rojects\P-BCH D-004\002_BCH D-1-PU DA_G M PA\Su bmitta Is\Cou my PENINSULA ENGINEERING BCHD1 CPUD AMENDMENT LISTED SPECIES SURVEY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA FIGURE 2 Bear Incident Location Map 17 P:\Active_P roj ects\P-BCH D-004\002_BCH D-1-PU DA_G M PA\Su bm itta Is\Co u my t r. I.v ' a A b 6 n 6 4 a 6 a• ?._. �_ ... •r # 4 � # R tr '�#;.' sr 'art •_ F ¢ 4 E. ,'I �Lr ��'i � •�{.ti:} �. �--:. -- t; '�r�"� t+ 4 :'�i' � Mbar .q � tr - _, 4,�. ;'�x�, t�� }�• a "',•r - .pk� � b' • ._. r tr �J �.,��. f` J1� t a; 4J• •: a`t, .i' "��t -� - • r, .f ..4.. Legend ��••- is +!+- p 1 0 Black Bear I ' rl [ • ], Flraperl� Boundary ��d # i } ♦ f ;uJca_:_sh-'I_�r,?oj=_,� x�>-fia°aJra¢' 9�a '• r.{� �.! •t ' '---I's _�Jy-i ��: �..-ll!J-: _�v Js�rfi'l .,.`�' :�![�i 8CHD1 CPUD Amendment Bear Incident Locations Through August 2022 PEN INSULAJ,,�� ENGINEERING IMMOKALEE ROAD - ESTATES COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT SMALL-SCALE GMPA (PL20220003246) EXHIBIT V.D PROJECT NARRATIVE, CRITERIA AND CONSISTENCY Protect Information The Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict was approved by Ordinance 2021-019 and is an existing 19.13-acre commercial subdistrict located on the west side of Immokalee Road, approximately one-half mile north of Randall Boulevard, in Section 22, Township 48 South, Range 27 East. The property to the south is currently under development, is designated as Immokalee Road/41" Street NE Mixed Use Subdistrict and is zoned Randall Curve MPUD. The west and north are designated Residential Estates Subdistrict and are currently zoned Estates. The adjacent properties fronting on Immokalee Road to the north of the subject site are undeveloped; properties fronting on 4tn St NE include a mix of vacant and large lot single-family dwellings typical to the Estates. The Orange Tree MPUD is located on the east side of Immokalee Road and is designated as a Rural Settlement Area District. The subject property is zoned BCHD I CPUD (Ordinance 2021-020) and is approved for up to 200,000 sf of commercial uses. Consistent with subsection e. of the Subdistrict and Special Condition 6.h. of the CPUD, the westernmost 361 feet of the property (Parcel ID 37698360109) has been acquired by the adjacent property owner (Themel) and can only be utilized as open space and a driveway for the adjacent residential use. The remaining 19.1-acres is owned by BCHD Partners I, LLC and has received staff approval for a Construction Plan and Plat (PL20210002267, Winchester). Details of Request The purpose of this GMPA is to expand the Immokalee Road -Estates Commercial Subdistrict by approximately 2.69-acres, by adding the parcel that fronts on Immokalee Road immediately to the north of the site. This property was acquired by BCHD Partners I, LLC and is currently vacant. The proposed GMPA seeks to update the Rural Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map and the Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict Map. Text changes to the Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element are limited to revising the acreage and updating the allowed commercial intensity treating gross commercial Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict Page 1 1 GMPA — P L20220003246 Revised — December 20, 2022 2600 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, Florida, 34105 Office 239.403.6700 Fax 239.261.1797 Fla Engineer CA 28275 Fla Landscape CA LC26000632 Fla Surveyor/Mapper LB8479 PENINSULA�� ENGINEERING 4 floor area separate from indoor self -storage floor area. The GMPA does not propose any additional changes. A companion PUDA application (PL20220003248) has been submitted to update the Master Concept Plan (MCP) of the BCHD I MPUD. The additional acreage will primarily be used to meet the County's preserve requirement and allow for the commercial area within the existing MPUD boundaries to be reconfigured. A copy of the proposed PUDA application is included with this application and the existing and proposed MCP is shown below. Existing MCP (Ord 2021-20) Proposed MCP r w��u'h�el�JFuy��pv�'�rnF�r �� l•, r'._�+ I - � W9EGFFFu rca l �.-: IismV.1W C..,q...�a�. EMMtFR P R - g ` ANMRfiENENT�' 4 � EMEN S onanc LEGEND - 1 % DEVIATION warm l[R �.. rwE OF aa. c COMMERCIAL ersn.Es SEE EA41813 P. ITEM g.g. d9.R wgcxigaEg mRgwcm uRuoRwirow:ssol s , • I 1 � � 11 3 C C CONSISTENCY WITH FLORIDA STATUTES AND THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN FS Section 163.3177(6)(a)(2) — Required and Optional Elements of a Comprehensive Plan The future land use plan and plan amendments shall be based upon surveys, studies, and data regarding the area, as applicable, including: a. The amount of land required to accommodate anticipated growth. b. The projected permanent and seasonal population of the area. c. The character of undeveloped land. d. The availability of water supplies, public facilities, and services. e. The need for redevelopment, including the renewal of blighted areas and the elimination of nonconforming uses which are inconsistent with the character of the community. f. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to or closely proximate to military installations. g. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to an airport as defined in s. 330.35 and consistent with s. 333.02. h. The discouragement of urban sprawl. Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict Page 1 2 G M PA — P L20220003246 Revised — December 20, 2022 2600 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, Florida, 34105 Office 239.403.6700 Fax 239.261.1797 Fla Engineer CA 28275 Fla Landscape CA LC26000632 Fla Surveyor/Mapper LB8479 PENINSULA~� ENGINEERING i. The need for job creation, capital investment, and economic development that will strengthen and diversify the community's economy. j. The need to modify land uses and development patterns within antiquated subdivisions. Response: The Subdistrict was previously found to be consistent with Florida Statues and supported by data and analysis by Ordinance 2021-019. The minor expansion of the Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict is proposed to reconfigure preservation areas; the area of expansion will consist of new preservation area and will allow for the interconnections to the north. An Environmental assessment is included as Exhibit V.0 and demonstrates that the area being added to the subdistrict consists of similar classifications which support the reconfiguration of the preserve area. All of the commercial intensity currently permitted by the Subdistrict, as approved by Ordinance 2021-019, will be located within the existing subdistrict boundaries. The property is located adjacent to six -lane arterial roadway and has available water and sewer service and is proximate to public facilities and services. There are no adjacent or proximate military installations or airports. Incorporating the additional 2.69-acre parcel into the Subdistrict will help to modify land uses and development patterns within the Golden Gate Estates antiquated subdivision and eliminate the potential for an additional residential driveway onto Immokalee Road. FS Section 163.3177 (8) Future Land Use Map Amendments 8. Future Land use map amendments shall be based upon the following analyses: a. An analysis of the availability of facilities and services b. An analysis of the suitability of the plan amendment for its proposed use considering the character of the undeveloped land, soils, topography, natural resources, and historic resources on site. c. An analysis of the minimum amount of land needed to achieve the goals and requirements of this section. Response: The property is suitable for the proposed commercial uses given availability of utilities, the proximity to a 6-lane arterial roadway, access to a traffic signal, and the potential to capture vehicle trips already on the high volume roadway. The undeveloped 2.69-acres being added to the Subdistrict has similar soils, topography and natural resource characteristics as the existing Subdistrict and will be used primarily as preservation land. The additional land is the minimum amount of land needed to update the commercial area within the site to accommodate the commercial intensity established in Ordinance 2021- 019. FS Section 163.3187(1) — Process for Adoption of Small -Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment 1. A small-scale development amendment maybe adopted under the following conditions: The proposed amendment involves a use of 50 acres or fewer and: b. The proposed amendment does not involve a text change to the goals, policies, and objectives of the local government's comprehensive plan, but only proposes a land use change to the future land Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict Page 1 3 G M PA — P L20220003246 Revised — December 20, 2022 2600 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, Florida, 34105 Office 239.403.6700 Fax 239.261.1797 Fla Engineer CA 28275 Fla Landscape CA LC26000632 Fla Surveyor/Mapper LB8479 PENINSULA~� ENGINEERING use map for a site -specific small scale development activity. However, text changes that relate directly to, and are adopted simultaneously with, the small-scale future land use map amendment shall be permissible under this section. C. The property that is the subject of the proposed amendment is not located within an area of critical state concern, unless the project subject to the proposed amendment involves the construction of affordable housing units meeting the criteria of S. 420.0004(3), and is located within an area of critical state concern designated by S. 380.0552 or by the Administration Commission pursuant to S. 380.05(1). Response: The Subdistrict with the proposed 2.69-acre addition totals 21.82-acres. The amendment does not involve text amendment to the goals, policies and objectives of the Collier County Growth Management Plan and is located outside of the Area of Critical State Concern. GMP Future Land Use Element: OBJECTIVE 5: Implement land use policies that promote sound planning, protect environmentally sensitive lands and habitat for listed species while protecting private property rights, ensure compatibility of land uses and further the implementation of the Future Land Use Element. Response: The proposed GMPA and PUDA utilize sound planning practices to protect environmentally sensitive lands while protecting private property rights of adjacent land owners. The application allows for additional land to be placed into a conservation easement and the project has been designed to minimize impacts to adjacent residences. Policy 5.6: New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code (Ordinance 04-41, adopted June 22, 2004 and effective October 18, 2004, as amended). Response: The expanded Subdistrict and associated PUD is designed to be compatible with adjacent properties. The additional acreage will primarily be utilized as native preserve, providing a significant buffer to adjacent residential uses. The commercial area is slightly enlarged, but is oriented toward Immokalee Road, a six -lane divided arterial road. The development provides sufficient buffers to adjacent uses and is required to provide dark -sky compliant parking lot lighting to minimize potential impacts to adjacent properties. Policy 5.7: Encourage the use of land presently designated for urban intensity uses before designating other areas for urban intensity uses. This shall occur by planning for the expansion of County owned and operated public facilities and services to the existing lands designated for urban intensity uses, the Rural Settlement District (formerly known as North Golden Gate), and the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, before servicing new areas. Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict Page 14 G M PA — PL20220003246 Revised — December 20, 2022 2600 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, Florida, 34105 Office 239.403.6700 Fax 239.261.1797 Fla Engineer CA 28275 Fla Landscape CA LC26000632 Fla Surveyor/Mapper LB8479 PENINSULA~� ENGINEERING Response: The proposed amendment seeks to add approximately 2.69-acres into the existing Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict. The property is located at a signalized intersection on Immokalee Road in an area with public facilities. The additional acreage will be utilized primarily as native preservation area and allow for the commercial area to be slightly expanded within the existing Subdistrict boundaries. Policy 7.1: The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. Response: The Subdistrict and PUD has direct access onto Immokalee Road at the existing traffic signal opposite Orangetree Boulevard. There is no direct access to or from the commercial area to 4th Street NE. Access locations are not changing as part of this application. Policy 7.3: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and their interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. Response: Vehicular and pedestrian interconnection is provided from the site to properties to the north and the south. Transportation Element: Policy 5.1: The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume,- b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and c. For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict Page 15 G M PA — P L20220003246 Revised — December 20, 2022 2600 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, Florida, 34105 Office 239.403.6700 Fax 239.261.1797 Fla Engineer CA 28275 Fla Landscape CA LC26000632 Fla Surveyor/Mapper LB8479 PENINSULA~� ENGINEERING Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project's significant impacts on all roadways. Response: The existing Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict and the companion BCHD 1 CPUD limits commercial development to a maximum intensity of 200,000 square feet of gross floor area and also allows for air-conditioned mini- and self -storage warehousing (SIC 4225). Because self -storage facilities typically encompass larger floor areas while generating significantly fewer vehicle trips, the GMPA and PUDA seek to clarify that self -storage uses are to be treated separately from other commercial floor area and that for every two (2) square feet of self -storage area approved, the available commercial area shall be reduced by one (1) square foot. This change does not increase the commercial intensity of the development and therefore has no impacts to the adjacent roadways. Conservation and Coastal Management Element: Objectives 6.1: Protect native vegetative communities through the application of minimum preservation requirements. Objective 6.2: Protect and conserve wetlands and the natural functions of wetlands pursuant to the appropriate policies under Goal 6. Response: The development meets the minimum preservation requirements of the Land Development Code. Per LDC Section 3.05.07 B.1., commercial projects greater than 5-acres are required to provide 15% of the existing native vegetation as preserve area. The 21.82-acre project includes 21.70-acres of native vegetation and will retain 3.26 acres of preserve. Objective 7.1: Direct incompatible land uses away from listed animal species and their habitats. (The County relies on the listing process of State and Federal agencies to identify species that require special protection because of their endangered, threatened, or species of special concern status. Listed animal species are those species that the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission has designated as endangered, threatened, or species of special concern, in accordance with Rules 68A-27.003, 68A-27.004, and 68A-27.005, F.A.C. and those species designated by various federal agencies as Endangered and Threatened species published in 50 CFR 17.) Response: No state or federally listed species were observed on site during observations made in 2018, 2019 or 2022 and the property does not contain US Fish and Wildlife Service -designated listed species critical habitat. Although no listed species were observed, the property does have potential to have listed species due to the presence of suitable habitat, confirmed sightings in the region or because the property is located within the consultation area for given species. The development will preserve 15% of the existing native vegetation (3.26-acres) as required by the Collier County LDC and all development will maintain required setbacks from the preserve to help ensure incompatible uses are directed away from listed species and their habitats. Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict Page 1 6 GMPA — P L20220003246 Revised — December 20, 2022 2600 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, Florida, 34105 Office 239.403.6700 Fax 239.261.1797 Fla Engineer CA 28275 Fla Landscape CA LC26000632 Fla Surveyor/Mapper LB8479 ,] t| 2 » a ! ! § cm Me_s { \ / ( { \ / - Mew e A3 _ 2� J ♦ _ \/ ca % § ! § ®e � % X � # — . I �� ! ! n�ejo wI ■ � ■ � | � j � � I ■ § 3 I I ! 1 % ! % ) % - 2 ) I % Co � ° �� ♦ - --- _ __� %%% 2 6 � ♦ § ---------- \ § /S / } i , 2 02 \ z§ - \ \ ■ \\ .) }k (k/ E § §)) o ] , " ■ \ 2 ) r� e ) / k % § ! _ mew P, B u % ) \ cc \ �5 j \ _ \ :9:�� a. _ 0 2 � /& D S❑ 1 f ) W . , 0. 'Dp O 0 v r+ 0 Q Nb011 y Q@ IV « N C E= Q Qco RT N CL O-C T 2 Z C O N 0 O w b011i 0 "- 0 w Qa ° ¢ l6 W ao3 c O O O O O v jE N a3 o O_ Q m O 0 �a� O N3Q p ai scam oo�Ea LL > O 0� O N LL C O X a N O 'O S LL O N c o O p J = O N•O D y E 0 -a O 0 ¢ W '. >. « y 0 0 c m o 9 li Y N •O O 'O 0 3 'B rl C i y N O 0 p. ai @ U y R T LL 'O « T « 0 O \ O t 3 c c C N N N N LL O O r y 9 '4) Lb 16 al > - Q y N FT, N 4 N U T c ., as N Q ai � E 0 y C >• E R O / LL y O U U C M ai O S L '6 O O ai G> N LL O NULj 0 > T O 0 0 O 0 li 0 C > r w O 0 0� 'O 0 Q 2 •O N� 3 G E 0� E-0 c w y� O li at ai « NU> ca 3 N 0 Z O L O it LL C O N 'O > O y C U O W .O Lb O 3 = - (.> 0 t O Q O ai O c 0 Q O r Ia N .0 'O W LL 'O C L1 0 i� 0 '- U> -- O ai U j ai U £ p Z m Q O i= W O 0 N c C 0 LL r J C O U Y - U 0 O O F In H INa Q N y •O T Q 0 c N aS r O N Q E> a O O r0+ Co O Q ai 0 p 3 m f6 c= w Q 0 O ate+ fn U U 3 3 y O O C 0 0 a5 li O V m ai y UO O r 'y0 Q O- 4 0 •p > N N .O 3 0 Q •O N�n«« O 0 0 N D 0 ca Z O «_ « '00 o L N ' Q ai d 0 w ca aS a> ai ai w at 0 0 00 N M •O R 0 N O ._ .a r p ai E Q 0 � Q> N �a C 0 Co L N O E c 0 m c N 0 S rl N 0 0 O O D ai d> �> p .0 y LL U Q J Q d Q W d Q > L 0 U J o as U �i O N E U 00 J o O T U L1 S ;nn O O Z c O ."0_' y _N W Q c N 0 C N o E' 0 U01 0 « n 0 '� w W 1 W o I N OI O N _ I I I I Q C ai t0c c E r N O + U 3' c 0) E N N V C E 4\ 0 w T w c) '0 LL `� '0 D Q 9 OQns O J \ ` N = �Qas N�3U, OQOD cJ\aso� ' QE�EU, X _ m m 1 Qa> U>•00 M 'OLL O 0 t0/0 O�OQ E.6 Q ¢ O ON O Q LLD O S N Q Jtn Q W �N W W to J E E Qc O, ai .0+ NZ•a mS 0 ai > ) c LL O- ns c_0 c c E O - 0 0. W O W N Q u+ w S S W Z Q O E> O R O t 0 N Q N y C N i r 0 LJL Q = Q W U ~ Q a E 4 C O N U~ E E 0 O' R R W �% a� ap W cs� L a a5 :E t��awEa"i tdm�En'n N L-n� c c3�«n L-a J dQ =0 p U) S 1- LL O C6 N m O _O H O m Z m Q co i y p yr O 1 O m m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ln C) Ln N m- �ks L §) 2 ) 2 Am�nRD�� m � : ^ 0102® § \ § \ § k mP avo �s#,I ~ § \ , A»q § ` \ iN / £ p# 7�ees® 2 ) B k SIM2 � 2 k v )� 2 ° �fv �af�# _- -- �� 2A � �\ �& ��°«�v �■ � o� �m �z a � � \ k _ G00 \ \ cc D k LU WQ,Ae_l � § LU 0 2 2k § § 2 m co _ m $ § § � ti MIN �s4#, ) z 0 2k §)) ) 0 J � \ % k \ m, 3 q, 0 B tr Q e Z § LU � § 7 § = 8 L a) c ° § \ ( § MIN IS 4 2 \ k� Q \ w wz w � J U (MIS Saftaulml A �e 0 � � PENINSULAJ,,,,�L ENGINEERING Memorandum Date: February 3, 2023 To: Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA, CSM From: Christopher Scott, AICP RE: Immokalee Road -Estates Commercial Subdistrict GMPA/BCHD I PUDR (PL20220003426/PL20220003428) A Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) was conducted for the above referenced project on Thursday, January 26, 2023 at 5:30 pm at the OF/IFAS Extension, located at 14700 Immokalee Road. Approximately 20 individuals from the public attended the meeting (see attached sign -in sheet). The meeting was simultaneously conducted through Zoom. Individuals associated with the project team that were in attendance included the following: • Christopher Scott, Peninsula Engineering • Noel J. Davies, Davies Duke, PLLC • Eric Mallory, Metro Commercial Chris Scott opened the meeting at 5:38 pm and provided a PowerPoint presentation outlining the details of the proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment and Planned Unit Development Rezoning. Following the presentation, the meeting was opened to attendees for comments and questions. The following is a summary of the questions asked, and comments made, by the attendees and responses given by the project team. Question/Comment: (John Pelletier, 2961 4th St NE). It's great to see this many people here for this meeting; two years ago there were only three people. Couple things ... what was meant by "fewer trips?" Response: The original PUD was approved for 200,000 sf of commercial floor area. When a PUD application is submitted they are required to submit a traffic study to analyze how many trips would be created. The approved TIS with this PUD used 200,000 sf of a commercial shopping center to determine how many trips would be generated. We're now revising the PUD from 200,000 sf of total commercial floor area to specify 130,000 sf of indoor self -storage floor area, which is already a permitted use, and 100,000 sf of other commercial floor area. Since the storage use is such a low traffic generator, the proposed amendment will result in fewer trips than what was originally approved. We're not proposing to change the trip cap that was established as part of the approved PUD. PL20220003426/PL20220003428 BCHD I PUDR NIM Summary Page 1 2600 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, Florida, 34105 Office 239.403.6700 Fax 239.261.1797 Fla Engineer CA 28275 Fla Landscape CA LC26000632 Fla Surveyor/Mapper LB8479 PENINSULA~� ENGINEERING 4 My only request, is that if you have to redo this Master Concept Plan, is that you provide more buffering where it is adjacent to the Estates lot. I know it says Type B, but I would recommend adding some three palms between the trees and hedge that are required. The 47-acres has four-story apartment buildings going in and I just wanted something so I wasn't looking directly at them. There is a Site Development Plan application already in for the self -storage. We are not proposing any changes to the buffers as part of this application. The Collier County LDC requires a Type B buffer, which is one of the more intense buffers in this location. This buffer is 15-feet wide and includes a five foot hedge with trees spaced 25 feet on center. For clarification, the four-story apartments are part of the development to the south known as Randall Curve MPUD. Question/Comment: (Freddie Brantley, 3357 Mystic River Dr) Are the four-story apartments three stories over parking or four living floors? Response: (Chris Scott) My understanding is that is four living floors, but that is a separate project. Question/Comment: (Chad Everett) I have a couple questions. I know you say this is two separate developments, but we consider this all one project. First of all, are there two storage facilities planned or just one? This extra land, we call it "creep." It keeps creeping north. What is that road that goes to the north? Are you going to provide another road coming in and off of Immokalee Road? Response: (Chris Scott) I'm only aware of the self -storage facility within this (BCHD) development. In regards to the arrow on the Master Concept Plan, that points to the north. Collier County's Growth Management Plan required interconnection to adjacent properties, even if they aren't developed just to minimize the number of curb cuts going onto arterial roadways. This amendment continues to allow for that interconnection; it won't be made unless something to the north develops and wants to connect. Question/Comment: (Chad Everett) What is so important about adding these 2 additional acres? What are you going to do if you don't get approved? Response: The purpose of this addition is to allow the commercial area north of the entrance at Orangetree to allow for a more developable lot. The existing commercial site has preserve on the west side and is required to provide access through the lot to adjacent properties to the north. The additional land will allow for the commercial lot to be reconfigured to make it more developable. If the Amendment does not get approved, then development would need to meet the current development standards and fit within the approved commercial area. It is a net increase of 0.12-acres of commercial based on the acreages shown on the approved MCP. (Chad Everett) When does this commercial expansion stop? We need to stop this creep. I'm personally against this and will do everything I can to stop it. PL20220003426/PL20220003428 BCHD I PUDR NIM Summary Page 2 PENINSULA~� ENGINEERING 4 Question/Comment: (Ty Vigil, 180 33rd Ave NE) As a commercial realtor, I'm in favor of development but it needs to be smart. The County just approved a transitional use plan and there should be appropriate flow from commercial to residential. We love the rural attributes of the Estates. Since these properties have been cleared, we're experiencing more wildlife in our areas. I'm for development just against this type. It should be developed but there's too much traffic and the apartments aren't even here yet. There are already crosses on the road and now more people will need to cross Immokalee to get to school. It doesn't meet the county resolution on transitional uses; it doesn't flow right ... it goes commercial to residential. So, I don't really have a question, but I just have that statement to be recorded. Response: (Chris Scott) I will note that the location of the preserve and stormwater ponds are intended to provide a transition from the commercial development to the adjacent Estates properties. (Ty Vigil) There is damage to trees from where the property has been cleared and who replaces that. And someone will need to inspect and remove invasives. In this current form, I'm not against development, but I'm against this. Question/Comment: (Judy Womelsdorf, 3214 Brookeview Court) How much of the land is wetlands? Response: (Chris Scott) I don't have that information in front of me. The application includes environmental analysis and the preserve area being added has a considerable amount of wetlands. Any development that occurs, in regards to wetlands impacts, will need state and/or federal approval. (Judy Womelsdorf, 3214 Brookeview Court) Any wetland credits that are purchased for impacts go to the center of the state and don't help the local wildlife, flora and fauna. That's one concern I have with the request. I think the whole area was wetlands and I don't think they should be destroyed. Questions/Comment: (Dick Brewer, 2871 4t" St NE) What type of buffer is provided on the southwest corner of the property between the commercial area and the adjacent Estates property. Right now from my front yard I can see all the way to Immokalee Road so I would like to some buffer so I don't see commercial buildings. Response: (Chris Scott) There is a 15-foot wide Type B buffer, as required by County Code, on the western boundary. That buffer includes trees spaced 25-feet on center and a five-foot tall hedge. The southern boundary is also a Type B buffer where it abuts residential uses and a 10-foot wide Type A buffer where it abuts other commercial uses. Question/Comment: (Name not provided) Have you cleared out all of the trees up to the boundary already? There are no trees on your side there currently where it backs up to a red barn. Response: (Chris Scott) The development has to meet stormwater requirements and get an Environmental Resource Permit approval from South Florida Water Management PL20220003426/PL20220003428 BCHD I PUDR NIM Summary Page 3 PENINSULA~� ENGINEERING 4 District. In order to construct the required perimeter berms to make sure that stormwater remains on site, that area has been cleared. That buffer area will be planted in the future. Will there be a wall? (Chris Scott) I'm not sure about the specifics for the storage development; the LDC does not require a wall at this location and it was not a requirement of the PUD. (Eric Mallory) There is not a wall proposed with the storage building. Question/Comment: (Dan Brett, 6920 241" Ave NE) Have they submitted for a traffic light at the entrance. (Chris Scott) There is an existing traffic signal at the main entrance from Immokalee Road at Orangetree Boulevard. That is the only access to the site. It was already approved and there is no request to change that with this application. There is no access to 4t" Street. The development will provide the required interconnection to the north and the south. Question/Comment: (Name not provided) It looks like they are doing some type of changes in there on Immokalee Road further south of the Orangetree Boulevard. (Chris Scott) Those improvements are associated with the adjacent PUD and I do not have details. You could check with Collier County to verify what improvements and access are required and approved for that development. Question/Comment: (Ty Vigil) Modify my comments a little bit in regards to C-1 through C-3 is a broad term of uses. Nursing and professional care and medical could help with the area. When we see carwashes and laboratories and self -storage and warehousing it leaves us a little uncomfortable. Not opposed to development, just do it smart. Jobs would make sense as commercial would help make self-sustaining communities as we head east. If there are jobs in medical, then that would make sense. Some uses are an emphatic no. Response: (Chris Scott) This amendment is primarily to reconfigure the commercial areas. It is not proposing to change any of the permitted uses that have already been approved for the development. Question/Comment: (Chad Everett) Can't you remove uses with this amendment? Since the developer wants more, why don't you make some concessions. Self -storage isn't needed. Bill told me this was going to be a medical place and now I hear about storage uses. Response: (Eric Mallory) I'll tell you where we're at. We have a range of uses, but its not done; people are still in their due -diligence period. With price increases, things can change. The property along Immokalee (bottom right) is actually two outparcels which will include a potential McDonalds at the intersection and then a larger outparcel below that is planned to be a medial office building. The southwest commercial area is proposed to be a self -storage; and there is only one self -storage between this PL20220003426/PL20220003428 BCHD I PUDR NIM Summary Page 4 PENINSULA~� ENGINEERING 4 development and the adjacent PUD. North of the storage is another medical office building. There are two medical office buildings planned here. The northern C is why we are amending the PUD. We want to square up that lot and want to do a small shopping center. The deviation will allow parking up front. That is really all we are asking for. Our project is relatively small and discreet. Question/Comment: (No name provided) There was supposed to be a shopping center on Randall on the west side for a Publix and CVS. Why are we going to build another one here? Response: (Eric Mallory) I don't know anything about the shopping center you're talking about. This is a relatively small center. For example, a Publix is approximately 55,000 sf; the total square footage we're talking about here is 35,000 sf at most. It is a community shopping center that is likely to be anchored by a hardware store and a small one at that. A Home Depot or Lowes is approximately 100,000 sf. This is not that scale. This is to serve the community and we don't have any other retail proposed. Question/Comment: (No name provided) And no one seems to know anything about this 450 apartments. A couple years ago it was supposed to be a retirement community. Now we don't know if they're low rent apartment, cheaper or whatever. Is there any way to know what is going on? Response: (Eric Mallory) That developer is the Davis Group and it is a different developer. Question/Comment: (Ty Vigil) As you are explaining this, it is growing on me a smidge. I would just say we don't want nightlife. We are ok with hardware ... we just don't want that restaurant that is open until 2 am? Response: (Chris Scott) In looking at the Zoom chat, the only question is how to obtain a copy of the presentation. My contact information was on the letter and feel free to reach out to me and I'll send you a copy. Question/Comment: (Woody Brula, 2393 Orchard St) Are you the group that I got a draft of a lawsuit regarding the lot line? From what I'm reading is when they laid down the lots they put it in the wrong place. Response: (Eric Mallory) That is not this law firm, but it is from this developer. The monuments were in the wrong place. So from 4t" Street to Immokalee there is 30' missing. (Chris Scott) That affects all lots between 4t" Street and Immokalee. There was a surveying error when they were first putting down those roads from the original Golden Gate plat. The canal that is to the west is 30' larger than it should be and the land between 4tn and Immokalee is 30' smaller. That is a separate matter that isn't a part of this application. Question/Comment: (Judy Womelsdorf, 3214 Brookeview Ct) My biggest concern is the traffic. Getting out is difficult and if there was an emergency. What you have to go through just to get to Publix is awful. I don't see anyone ever addressing traffic. PL20220003426/PL20220003428 BCHD I PUDR NIM Summary Page 5 PENINSULA~) ENGINEERING '1 (Chad Everett) I made this point last time and no one cares. The commissioners don't care about traffic; they don't live out here. We want this to stop; we don't want it to reach Oil Well. My goal is to stop this. The bears that live in this area; we now have four bear families living in our area. I understand what you're trying to do, but we need to stop it. Question/Comment: (No name given) Between Valencia Trail and Shadowlawn; its Peninsula and it's called N- Square or Immokalee Square. It's another apartment project — hundreds of apartments. Response: (Chris Scott) That is a separate project. If there are no more questions regarding this application, then we will adjourn the meeting. The meeting is adjourned. PL20220003426/PL20220003428 BCHD I PUDR NIM Summary Page 6 T m I fa �U E E O U Ln a) a--+ Ln w I O DC N O E E co c� N rn 0 O N O N CD z w w z O a OC O U— z 0 O O re O m w z rn N O cV a D z a A-4 jz v.Z Z( Z Z W w .0 +� a Q �, CT O o � + +-j a E � v � (1) V) E °' o a) � O U CT O � N N tw Q � 00 A-4 jz N Z O UH O oc z ON w 2 U J W w W 1 a� w m m U w A-4 jz a a z 0 a U 0 A-4 jz z 0 Q oc O LL U w O oc a r f -7 W V u 0 E U vi c�6 p , •� p U Q) 0O U) U N i - m W N N 0 m 0 v N U .� O ' 4-1 p O Z3 O O kr 1 1 .i ) N _ u X 0 N �6 O O OU C6 O A-4 jz z g CL DC w H Q z F- X LU LnLn2 '00 � u U U U U U m U m T T T T r rl N Ln I�, 00 'j Lr) r-I 00 1'0 Ol O N c-I c-I Ql N c-I c-I t v • � Q a v o +' O E--, a b.0 aJ E i U N N 4- W aj Hai 0 � " co H U a c/f ❑ O� a NY J ii W IUD m uJ Wdw f 5C �� w ah a� " LU a� u�esc r�V3 W�Y �Y13 m IMMOKALEE ROAD _ — ---— — --- rm r LLw z a ac t" LU LU 0 wz LL r$QJ o C n LLI ,go - - �w aw . ..a.;. �Qw o: wa .ba+a�z Lut Ll a� u�law wnILL ..........,?,sgmmy V w rcF �z z a al e� ? z a� ¢ c { q¢ w LU in❑j 0a9 w t.A G 0a ❑ t awoOUa a Wm D 7z �aw V- Wo s �� a ❑Vi �Z a ❑ a G a wW FLL[ ANi u�i W , W d W 'j❑n wII: W ILC) * � m u a Z n I U a 11 LL ¢ P C aTH sTPFer N.E. Jj g 0 a a a �2 aw wa �o a_ LU a w W z m [p C [6 LU H LL Q H z�m Qom= 0 ¢ 2 w LLJ LD a�Lu LUU --JI NO k A-4 jz z g rN U Z O U DC W H a 0 w O a O oc a NNn00� uU m u m U T U T U T U T N 00 L1 lD N r--1 lD fV q lD Lq -I " r j N c-I QC v O E \ Q 'v = .. tCC7ACL CC C UJ a fD +� z G N C/) Ea + N N �n 1 4-1 W ro N cc I- �y Oa ax ��CMoti�nerW �o — omx33mnwwi �, ❑ 8 Ha �F_ i I Yo w� I z 8 I w� smN f 96 Lw a + � W s a m 4O z 'v n '3N 133WJ H19 Nail [L o- / IP NJ. N W (D Q U 0 w cn O a O ac a U (3) D J c U L- Q) 0 T-4 m � m 0 + + + + tto Ln N �D Ln N CL CLwT-1wT-1 V) 0 CL 0 CL �r,4Ln�m CLL,�WM� u ��v-1 CM c :p M y w 0 u m V) Ck- c 73W LU Cp C L ro c .0 au >ra 0 aj tin L Lu V1 E u R;r C J N W z Q U w O a O oc a m � m S- m O O w O O _0 U i4— Q) m Q — ,M • — O � u O N Q) Q E Q) m O O 00 CD UQ) �U M Ln m L 0O 0 m N �p Lt:: m U O M U CO � N v Ul) L.- M m O Q) L O O 4--, U O O O .� O 4- - � 0- CL N M E U O m E O 4-1 O cn Q Q cn U N U M � M _ O 4 U Q) � O L4- N � O N m DC � -0 Q) O M Q) V) O •j rl Q N O Q Q Cf:� 46 • H O T 4- a--j U O U a� C6 E UO i--1 C- Q) E E E O O a--J Q) O U O 11 O LA A-4 jz Q w 0 w cn O a O oc a 4 z � = O w O QJ c O N N c O a -j a-- O LL: � N '� v 1 N O Ln O O Q� tZ0 Ln N Q v Q cn = — +-, � O � OZ Q N O O uLn - OU v n3 U N U OU 4—+ Q M �' O Q� Q 4-' N ` — J O O p O O � � � 0O a--, c� oC c6 E Q � cn _ � O N cn O J tZ0 +- c� N a--J , O +N Q — — D +� c:)E E 0 O �, A-4 jz N Z O w on 4- a) a) a) E E 0 cn a) ui ui C\l a) 6 co '44- a) � cu 0co 0 00 o c ry C) CN ap a) ici C\l m -TO E cu CN L- -�e -J 0 0 E— (D 04 E 0 �'c: 0 :t D a) CL 0 -1�, () L- cn 0 X (D r co z 113 <j Gj JVI Dr, C-4 -7� CL CIS 41 Ll 2�1 z ".-I -J p E E 0 U cn a) 4" cu w -6 cu 0 (D m Y 0 E E cn a) -C OE m z OC14 LWI Lld z WMm (11), z W"! ui gal 1 E 1 0 i U U) QN Z C\l 'IT c1r) C) 0 0 C\l N 0 04 —i n 4-0 Cl) CO a) E E 0 U cn a) 4- U) w -6 m 0 ct a) S? cu Y 0 E E E a) -f- co a) !ls- :D Ul) z I 00 N "T c1r) 0 0 0 0 C\l D C0 L 3: C) 00 z mwnl CC., UJ z (D -C U) C: I c 0) '5 0) a) 2 C: 0 cu E L- 0 4-- C "0 0 0 0 VI O O LO co O CN lti 1Q, I rI z L-..- N ttu aptrs 43a* NTtws PART OF THE USA TODAY NETWORK Published Daily Naples, FL 34110 PENINSULA ENGINEERING 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY NAPLES, FL 34105 ATTN Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WISCONSIN COUNTY OF BROWN Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, personally appeared who on oath says that they serve as legal clerk of the Naples Daily News, a daily newspaper published at Naples, in Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida; that the attached copy of the advertising was published in said newspaper on dates listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples, in said Collier County, Florida , for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. 1 /11 /2023 Subscribed and sworn to before on January 11th, 2023 Notary, State of WI, County of Brown My commission expires: " PUBLICATION COST: $302.40 KA:ate EEN ALLEN AD No: GC11000123 ary Public CUSTOMER NO: 585101 Stf Wisconsin PO#: PUBLIC NOTICE AD SIZE: DISPLAY AD 2X4.5 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING ADVERNSEMENT Newspaper Advertisement Layout: Project Location Map must be minimum of 2 inches by 3 inches: NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING The public is invited to attend a neighborhood information meeting hosted by Chris Scott of Peninsula Engineering and Noel Davies of Davies Duke, PLLC on Thursday, January 26, 2023, at 5:30 p.m. at the UFIIFAS Extension Collier County, 147001mmokalee Road, Naples, FL 34120. BCHD Partners I, LLC is seeking approval of a GMPA and PUDZ to add a 2.69-acre Estates zoned parcel that fronts on Immokalee Road to the existing 19.13-acre Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict (Ord 2021-19) and BCHD I CPUD (Ord 2021-20), The applications increase the size of the Subdistrict and CPUD to 21.82-acres, revise the allowed commercial intensity from 200,000 s.f. of gross commercial floor area to 100,000 s.f. of commercial floor area and 130,000 s.f of indoor -storage warehouse, including a deviation to parking lot design standards and providing other minor edits. The subject property consists of 21.82 acres, located on the west side of Immokalee Road opposite Orangetree Boulevard, in Section 22, Township 48 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. [PL20220003246 and PL202200032442791. < ttt SUBJECT ai WdlfRD GoDRT PROPERTY ggg ff¢�D Sl t � 7 1, C ° 01 29h AVE HE 2MAVE NE Business and property owners, residents, and visitors are welcome to attend the presentation and discuss the project. If you are unable to attend this meeting in person, but have questions or comments or wish to attend simultaneously through Zoom, please contact: Chris Scott, Planning Manager, Peninsula Engineering, 2600 Golden Gale Parkway, Naples, FL 34105 cscott@pen-eng.com (239) 403-6727. No-CCHN0123-01 Alk PENINSULAt� ENGINEERING ;6 January 10, 2023 Dear Property Owner: The public is invited to attend a Neighborhood Information Meeting to discuss the following planning and zoning applications that have been formally submitted to the Collier County Growth Management Department: ➢ Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA, PL20220003426) to expand the Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict ➢ Planned Unit Development Zoning (PUDZ, PL20220003428) to expand and amend the BCHD I Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) Thursday, January 26, 2023, at 5:30 pm OF/IFAS Extension Collier County 14700 Immokalee Road Naples, FL 34120 BCHD Partners I, LLC is seeking approval of a GMPA and PUDZ to add a 2.69-acre Estates zoned parcel that fronts on Immokalee Road to the existing 19.13-acre Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict (Ord 2021-19) and BCHD I CPUD (Ord 2021-20). The applications increase the size of the Subdistrict and CPUD to 21.82-acres, revise the allowed commercial intensity from 200,000 s.f. of gross commercial floor area to 100,000 s.£ of commercial floor area and 130,000 s.f. of indoor -storage warehouse, including a deviation to parking lot design standards and providing other minor edits. The subject property consists of 21.82 acres, located on the west side of Immokalee Road opposite Orangetree Boulevard, in Section 22, Township 48 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. MAV%E SulJECT OII WNf 1t OF PROPERTY §I .�"ofe g a Z i % �V1 29h AVE FC 2R.AvENE girtlls Ma The Neighborhood Information Meeting is for informational purposes; it is not a public hearing. On-line participation in the meeting will be available via Zoom. If you have questions related to the project or would like to participate virtually, please contact the individual listed below. Christopher Scott, AICP Peninsula Engineering Phone: 239.403.6727; Email: cscott@pen-eng.com 2600 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, Florida, 34105 Ottice 239.403.6700 Fax 239.261.1797 Fla Engineer CA 28275 Fla Landscape CA LC26000632 Fla Surveyor/Mapper LB8479