HEX Final Decision 2023-17HEX NO. 2023-17
HEARING EXAMINER DECISION
DATE OF HEARING.
May 11, 2023
PETITION.
Petition No. BD-PL20220006502 -72 Southport Cove - Hobbs Dock - Request for an 18-foot
boat dock extension from the maximum permitted protrusion of 20 feet allowed by Section
5.03.06.E.1 of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) for waterways greater than
100 feet in width, to allow a boat docking facility protruding a total of 38 feet into a waterway
that is 1334: feet wide. The subject property is located at 72 Southport Cove and is further
described as Lot 14, Southport on the Bay, Unit One, in Section 06, Township 48 South,
Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida.
GENERAL PURPOSE FOR THE PETITION.
The Petitioner desires to construct a new boat dock facility with two boat slips, each with a boat
lift, one for a 35-foot vessel and the other to be decked over for two personal watercraft.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION.
Approval with conditions.
FINDINGS.
The Hearing Examiner has jurisdiction over this Petitioner pursuant to Sec. 2-87(4) of the
Collier County of Ordinances, Sec. 8.10.00 of the Land Development Code, and Chapter 9 of
the County Administrative Code.
2. The public hearing for this Petition was properly noticed and conducted in accordance with all
County and state requirements.
3. The public hearing was conducted electronically and in -person in accordance with
Emergency/Executive Order 2020-04.
4. The Petitioner and/or Petitioner's representative executed the Hybrid Virtual Quasi -Judicial
Public Hearing Waiver related to conducting the public hearing electronically and in -person.
5. The County Staff presented the Petition followed by the Petitioner and/or Petitioner's
representative, public comment and then rebuttal by the Petitioner and/or Petitioner's
representative. There were no objections made at the public hearing.
Page 1 of 6
6. The County's Land Development Section 5.03.06.H. lists the criteria for dock facility
extensions. The Hearing Examiner may approve, approve with conditions, or deny a boat dock
extension request if it is determined that at least four (4) of the five (5) primary criteria, and at
least four (4) of the six (6) secondary criteria have been met.'
Primary Criteria:
Whether the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate in relation
to the waterfront length, location, upland land use and zoning of the subject property.
Consideration should be made of property on unbridged barrier islands, where vessels are
the primary means of transportation to and from the property. (The number should be
appropriate; typical single-family use should be no more than two slips; typical multi-
family use should be one slip per dwelling unit; in the case of unbridged barrier island
docks, additional slips may be appropriate.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the criterion HAS
BEEN MET. The subject property is improved with a single-family residence within a
residential component of a PUD. The petitioner desires to construct a dock facility with
two boat slips, each with a boat lift, one for a 35 foot vessel and the other to be decked
over for the keeping of two personal watercraft (PWC).
2. Whether the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the general
length, type and draft as that described in the petitioner's application is unable to launch or
moor at mean low tide (MLT). (The petitioner's application and survey should establish
that the water depth is too shallow to allow launching and mooring of the vessel(s)
described without an extension.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the criterion HAS
BEENMET. The subject property s shoreline consists of a natural mangrove rip -rap bank
that is located within a platted conservation easement (CE) that cannot be impacted by
anything other than a 4-foot-wide access walkway to the proposed dock. The dock must
extend out past the mangroves to avoid impacts and to reach water depths sufficient to
accommodate both boatlifts. As demonstrated by the provided Cross -Section (plans sheet
05 of 10) and the provided Boundary and Topographic Survey, there is insufficient water
depth to allow for the launching and mooring of the proposed 35 foot vessel at MLT
without the requested extension.
3. Whether the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation within an
adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. (The facility should not intrude into any
marked or charted navigable channel thus impeding vessel traffic in the channel.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the criterion HAS
BEEN MET. The proposed dock facility does not intrude into any marked or charted
navigable channel and is near the terminus end of the bay with little navigation other than
for neighboring properties. There are other choke points along this section of the waterway
'The Hearing Examiner's findings are italicized.
Page 2 of 6
that are more restrictive than this portion of the bay once the proposed dock has been
constructed.
4. Whether the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25 percent of the width of the
waterway, and whether a minimum of 50 percent of the waterway width between dock
facilities on either side is maintained for navigability. (The facility should maintain the
required percentages.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the criterion HAS
NOT BEENMET. The subject waterway is approximately 133 feet wide as measured from
MHWL to MHWL and the requested protrusion is 38 feet; therefore, the proposed dock
facility will occupy 28.57 percent of the width of the waterway. The width between dock
facilities on either shore is 64 feet; therefore, only 48.12 percent of the total waterway
width is maintained for navigation. The subject dock facility is to be located near the end
of a waterway which limits the amount of boating activity. Additionally, the applicant has
presented a less desirable dock configuration, which reduces the dock width to 4 feet on
each side of the vessel; this reduction would reduce the total protrusion by two feet to 36
feet which would result in the dock occupying 27.07 percent of the waterway with 49.62
percent remaining open for navigation.
5. Whether the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the facility would
not interfere with the use of neighboring docks. (The facility should not interfere with the
use of legally permitted neighboring docks.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the criterion HAS
BEEN MET The proposed dockfacility will exceed the required side/riparian setback of
15 feet by providing 27 and 33 foot setbacks from each respective riparian line; said dock
has been designed not to interfere with neighboring dock facilities.
Secondary Criteria:
Whether there are special conditions not involving water depth, related to the subject
property or waterway, which justify the proposed dimensions and location of the proposed
dock facility. (There must be at least one special condition related to the property; these
may include type of shoreline reinforcement, shoreline configuration, mangrove growth,
or seagrass beds.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the criterion HAS
BEEN MET. The subject property has a natural mangrove shoreline that cannot be
impacted or removed due to it being recorded as a conservation easement (CE) which
requires the dock to be on the waterward side of the mangrove fringe; the dock has been
designed with a 4-foot-wide walkway to transverse the conservation easement.
2. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe access to the vessel for
loading/unloading and routine maintenance, without the use of excessive deck area not
directly related to these functions. (The facility should not use excessive deck area.)
Page 3 of 6
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the criterion HAS
BEEN MET. The proposed boat dock facility has been designed to moor a 35 foot vessel
and two PWCs. The preferred design is comprised of a 4-foot access walkway and a U-
shaped dock as well as a decked over lift; the U-shaped portion was designed with one side
being 4 feet wide and the other 6 feet. A second concept has also been reviewed for which
each of the U-shaped platforms is 4 feet in width. The latter is preferable as the wider
platform allows better access to the vessel for the purposes of loading/unloading and
routine maintenance. It is not found that either design has excessive decking and both
designs would be safe for their intended purpose.
3. For single-family dock facilities, whether the length of the vessel, or vessels in
combination, described by the petitioner, exceeds 50 percent of the subject property's
linear waterfront footage. (The applicable maximum percentage should be maintained.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the criterion HAS
BEENMET. The subject property has 117.6± feet of water frontage. The primary vessel
to be moored at this dock facility is 35 feet and each of the two PWCs is 12 feet; however,
as the PWCs will be side -by -side staff is only using one for this calculation. For the
purposes of this calculation, the combined vessel and PWC length are 47 feet which
equates to 39.97 percent of the linear waterfront.
4. Whether the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view of
neighboring property owners. (The facility should not have a major impact on the view of
a neighboring property owner.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the criterion HAS
BEEN MET. The proposed dock facility has been designed to be setback 27 feet and 33
feet from respective riparian lines. Additionally, this property as well as the adjoining
properties, are located on a 20 foot -wide conservation easement that is predominantly
comprised of a natural mangrove shoreline that serves as a visual buffer of the waterway.
5. Whether seagrass beds will be impacted by the proposed dock facility. (If seagrass beds
are present, compliance with subsection 5.03.06.J of the LDC must be demonstrated.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the criterion HAS
BEEN MET. The submerged resources survey provided indicates that no seagrass beds
exist within 200 feet of the proposed dock. No seagrass beds will be impacted by the
proposed dock facility.
6. Whether the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of
subsection 5.03.06(E)(11) of this Code. (If applicable, compliance with section
5.03.06(E)(11) must be demonstrated.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the criterion is
NOT APPLICABLE. The provisions of the Collier County Manatee Protection Plan do
Page 4 of 6
not apply to single-family dockfacilities exceptfor those within the seawalled basin ofport
of the Islands; the subject property is not located within Port of the Islands.
ANALYSIS.
Based on a review of the record including the Petition, application, exhibits, the County's staff
report, and hearing comments and testimony from the Petitioner and/or the Petitioner's
representative(s), County staff and any given by the public, the Hearing Examiner finds that there
is enough competent, substantial evidence as applied to the criteria set forth in Section 5.03.06.1-1
of the Land Development Code to approve/deny Petition. The Petition meets 4 out of 5 of the
primary criteria and 5 out of 6 secondary criteria, with one criterion being not applicable.
DECISION.
The Hearing Examiner hereby APPROVES Petition Number BD-PL20220006502, filed by Jeff
Rogers of Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc., representing Andrew and Jennifer Hobbs, with respect
to the property described as 72 Southport Cove and is legally described as Lot 14, Southport on
the Bay, Unit One, in Section 06, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, for
the following:
• An 18-foot boat dock extension from the maximum permitted protrusion of 20 feet allowed
by Section 5.03.06.E.1 of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) for
waterways greater than 100 feet in width, to allow a boat docking facility protruding a total
of 38 feet into a waterway that is 133± feet wide, for the benefit of the subject property.
Said changes are fully described in the Proposed Dock and Restoration Planting Plans attached as
Exhibit "A" and the Boundary, Topographic Survey attached as Exhibit `B", and Concept 2 Plan
attached as Exhibit "C" and are subject to the condition(s) set forth below.
ATTACHMENTS.
Exhibit A — Proposed Dock and Restoration Planting Plans
Exhibit B — Boundary and Topographic Survey
Exhibit C — Concept 2 Plan
LEGAL DESCRIPTION.
72 Southport Cove and is legally described as Lot 14, Southport on the Bay, Unit One, in Section
06, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida
CONDITIONS.
1. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the
development.
Page 5 of 6
2. The restoration plantings described within the Restoration Plan must be installed and
inspected by Collier County staff prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Completion for
the boat dock.
DISCLAIMER.
Pursuant to Section 125.022(5) F.S., issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any
way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency
and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant
fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or
undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law.
APPEALS.
This decision becomes effective on the date it is rendered. An appeal of this decision shall be done
in accordance with applicable ordinances, codes and law.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AND EXHIBITS: SEE CLERK OF COURT, MINUTES
AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. DECISIONS OF THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR
VARIANCES, CONDITIONAL USES, AND BOAT DOCK EXTENSIONS SHALL BE
NOTED ON THE ZONING MAP FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES.
Date
Andrew Dickman, Esq., AICP
Hearing Examiner
Page 6 of 6
EXHIBIT "A"
S-rPCFE OF FLC>1Z1E:>A
A -
SUBJECT
PROPER
-------------
SUBJECT _
PROPERTY Q -
TAMPA
7
NAPLES 8
FT.MYER
't 91 8: 9 APL S
MIAMI yPy
u.
MARCO 8 1 8'9 6
ISLAND
GULF OFMEY]CO EVERGLADES
CITY KEY WEST
COLLIER COUNTY VICINITY MAP
SITE ADDRESS:
<> 72 SOUTHPORT COVE <> LATITUDE: N 21
BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 <> LONGITUDE: W-E
NOTES:
<> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURP,
AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION t
COUNTY AERIAL
DESIGNED; IJR 1. RMJ 1 03-2&23 1 JR I REV. SHT 05, NEW SHT 10
Turrell I Hall & AssociatesCOVE
DRA
WN _IY� I-
R'TE. RMI
—7-7 Inc.'nc- 72 SC:)U-lF-HPC:)F;Z-lF 12-05-22 3.
Marine & Environmental Consulting
V 3584 Exchanue Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732 SHEET NO.; 101 OF 10
7 LOCATION MAP JOB NO.: 122035 a.
Email:Nna@thanaples.com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 RY NO. 5875 SECTION-6 TOWNSHIP-48S RANGE-25E
0
s
N
�i
EXISTING (
ADJACENT ,
DOCK I
Turrell, Hall &Associates, Inc.
Marine &Environmental Consulting
3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732
Email: tuna@thanaples.com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632
661
SITE ADDRESS:
72 SOUTHPORT COVE
BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134
i �'
a? _�`
PROPERTY
LINE
0 20 4a 80
so;4LE 9N =T
NOTES:
THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT
INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE
ALL WATER DEPTHS AND DREDGE ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO NAVD88
SURVEYCOURTESYOF: "ABB, INC."
SURVEY DATED: 0408.2022
••• APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF): 117,6'
• EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF): 0
WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX): 13T
TIDAL DATUM:
• MHW (NAVD)= +0,01'
MLW NAVD = -0158'
7 2 S O U T H P 0 RT COVE CREA EDY2-05-22 9: - -
JOB NO.: 22035 4.
EXISTING CONDITIONS SHEETNO.: 1020FIO 15, 1 _
!V N�.SA75 N I NFSECTION-6 TOWNSHIP-48S
RANGE- 25 E
EXISTING
ADJACENT
DOCK
MLWL = -0.58'
NAVD 88
20' C.E.
PROPERTY
LINE/MHWL =
+0.01' NAVD 88
RIPARIAN I
LINE
BOAT LIFT
PROPOSED
FIXED DOCK
I
RIPARIAN
SETBACK LINE
- Turrell, Hall &Associates, Inc.
Marine &Environmental Consulting
3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732
Email: tuna@thanaples.com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632
N
o to 20 qo
SMP Z9N7PE7
PROPERTY
LINE
- -- ---- ---
OF SLOPE
EXISTING
MANGROVES
05 _
DECKED
OVER JET -SKI \
LIFT
RIPARIAN
SETBACK LINE
LITTLE HICKORY BAY
RIPARIAN
LINE
NOTES:
THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSESO L AND ARE NOT
INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE
ALL WATER DEPTHS AND DREDGE ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO NAVD8B
SURVEY COURTESY OF: "ABB, INC."
• • SURVEY DATED: 04-08-2022
APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF): 117.6'
EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF): 0
WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX): 133'
TIDAL DATUM:
• MHW (NAVD)= +0.01'
•• MLW (NAVD)= -0.56'
PROPOSED OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF): 635
TOTAL OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF): 635
TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM MHWL: 38'
DESIGNED: JR
JOB NO.; 22039
72 S O U T H P O RT C Off/ E CREATEDY R2-65
PROPOSED DOCK WITH DEPTHS SHEETNO.: 030E
Y No. 5875 SECTION-6
3.
5.
TOWNSHIP-48S
RANGE-25E
PROPERTY
EXISTING LINE/MHWL =
+0.01' NAVD 88
ADJACENT -
DOCK
MLWL = -0.58'
NAVD 88
30
I A 14'.
w 1
m j
I
I �
33' �-
PROPOSED -
FIXED DOCK
RIPARIAN I
LINE
Turrell, Hall &Associates, Inc.
Marine &Environmental Consulting
3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732
Email: tuna@tllanaples.com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632
BOAT LIFT
41'
35
'
�I
33'
m
121 ?
DECKED
OVER JET -SKI
LIFT
LITTLE HICKORY BAY
o ro zo po
sag 9N�FEE7
PROPERTY
LINE
XISTING TOE
OF SLOPE
EXISTING
MANGROVES
RIPARIAN
LINE
NOTES:
THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT
INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE,
ALL WATER DEPTHS AND DREDGE ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO NAVD88
SURVEY COURTESY OF: "ABB, INC."
• SURVEY DATED: 04.08.2022
• APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF): 117,6'
EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF): 0
WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX): 133'
TIDAL DATUM:
• MHW (NAVD)= +0.01'
MLW (NAVD)= -0.58'
•• PROPOSED OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF): 635
TOTAL-OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF): 635
TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM MHWL: 38,
DESIGNED: JR
7 2 S O U T H P 0 RT C Off/ E CREATEDY R2
PROPOSED DOCK WITH DIMENSIONS
SECTION-6
TOWNSHIP-48S RANGE-25E
DESIGNED: JR
7 2 S O U T H P 0 RT C Off/ E CREATEDY R2
PROPOSED DOCK WITH DIMENSIONS
SECTION-6
TOWNSHIP-48S RANGE-25E
PROPOSED
FIXED DOCK
PROPERTY
LINE
I 1
O
200' Et
E
o T .2 60
I I I
SCF(LE 9NTZ.ZT
LITTLE HICKORY BAY
— — — _ (TYP)
'NO SEAGRASSES WERE
_ OBSERVED GROWING
,WITHIN 200 FT OF THE
PROPOSED PROJECT
0.0
Turrell Hall &Associates Inc. DESIGNED: JR ,. _
7 2 S O U T H P O RT COVE DRAWN BY RMJ 2. _ _ _ _
Marine &Environmental Consulting CREATED: 12-05-22 3. _
JOB NO.: 1 M35 4. 1 _ _ I _
3584ExchangeAve. Naples, FL34104-3732 SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY SHEETNO.: 1060F10 P. I_
Email: tuna@thanaples.com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 IRY NO. 5875 SECTION-6 TOWNSHIP-48S RANGE- 25E
r
o zo �o ao
SCAM 9N7:=
Alt
PROPERTY
LINE
o.o
LITTLE HICKORY BAY
THE DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE
AND ARE TAKEN FROM THE AERIAL IMAGE.
Terrell, Hall &Associates, Inc. 72 S O U T H P O RT C OV E
Marine &Environmental Consulting
3584ExchangeAve. Naples, FL34104-3732 WIDTH OF WATERWAY - SITE
Email: tuna@thanaples.com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 ,Vun t„t TMFgF„„,�,„0„A„FFOR ,F„M,m„,,,,,a,„GF,,,„,,,„„,„r„,,,, TF„DFnF„„r.r.
„„,„„n„„,,,F
DESIGNED: JR P. _
DRAWN BY: RMJ 2.
CREATED: 12-OS-22 3.
JOB NO.: 22035 4.
SHEET NO.: OB OF 10 5.
SECTION-6 TOWNSHIP-48S RANGE-25E
rqq� N
s
a go roo zoo
SCACCZ9N7:ZZT
.I.
i^rd
/�- PROPERTY
/ LINE
' + ti
-^
•�� �� 'i :1.: '7' •"�-.a..�y 1. .` ' :�'V Q '��
Y.
dill
...GAr11�.fiJ� t *14 +� fir, f Y
�, +I f, '
woo
lAft ..' f.. r
Is IF
• .• .. — —
y
EXIST,.�
ADJACENT
DOCK
l
N
fig'
s
20 40 80
sca1LE �N ��
lanced:
ificName
Plant
Sizes
planting
Locations
oba zm ra
5 gal.
15' OC
rpzzs erectus
3 gel.
15' OC
ra germinans
1 gal.
15' OC
Ine cubana
3 gal.
5' OC
hum aurezon
1 gaL
ina bakeri
1-3 gal.
�1014
41
~A` 1
NOTES:
THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT
INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.
ALL WATER DEPTHS AND DREDGE ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO NAVD88
SURVEY COURTESY OF: "ABB, INC."
• • SURVEY DATED: 04-08.2022
APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF): 117.6'
EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF): 0
WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX): 133'
TIDAL DATUM:
• MHW (NAVD)= +0.01'
MLW NAVD = .0,58'
Turrell Hall &Associates Inc. DESIGNED: JR
Marine &Environmental Consulting
7 2 S O U T H P O R T COVE CREA EDv 0&2f
JOD NO.: 2203:
3584ExchangeAve. Naples,FL34104-3732 PLANTING PLAN SHEETNO.: 001
Email• tuna@thanaples.com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 RY NO.5875 a v SECTION-6
TOWNSHIP-48S
RANGE- 25 E
EXHIBIT "B"
LEGAL DESCRI—
LOT It, SOUTHPORT ON TIE PAY. UNITY ONE. ACCORDING
W MAP OR PLAT iNEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOR
PACE 51, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA.
PLAT LOi AREA-11097t S0. FT.
LOT AREA TO M.N.W.L-10P062 SO.FT. 1III(111�1
'. FIRE NYCRANT I i
N - WA16t vALK 'T'
0 - CAIJ E N PISER
®_ ELECTRIC PANDNOLE N
(c)- FIELD AAS
(OF)- FIELD uEASUPRC
FOUND CON RCN RODUCAP
❑ -FOUND CONCNETE MONUMENT
SCALE,
OF
-
• AA a`nANWSvvnNC
nA a Awa. RaI No. a,UYn 8 rt�noll. R. 5. M. ro.a•�N a+w ��o
1. NOT
aonc nmm In[ o lni. cF lw IN— .1
McvAnora .a[ rsrAv[wm uvw aig(a�mATML Rwvs�w c�slsm)w�
m6fArx PIT ailm0 u
m-auAmnr !m tR In[ mar mm (no[pA 1 via NE—L
BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY
EXHIBIT "C"
11
II
PROPERTY
EXISTING LINE/MHWL =
+0.01' NAVD 88
ADJACENT
DOCK
MLWL = -0.58'
NAVD 88
30' —
I
RIPARIANI
20' C.E.
w
PROPOSED
FIXED DOCK
BOAT LIFT
ri,
N� 26
4' ,� \
2' T
7
DECKED
OVER JET -SKI'
LIFT
LITTLE HICKORY BAY
N
A.
s
0 r0 20 40
MMM—
SC?(CE 9N �i7
PROPERTY
LINE
— EXISTING TOE
OF SLOPE
EXISTING
MANGROVES
\ �RIPARIAN
LINE
NOTES:
• THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT
INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.
• ALL WATER DEPTHS AND DREDGE ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO NAVD88
• SURVEY COURTESY OF: "ABB, INC."
•• SURVEY DATED: 04-08.2022
• APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF): 117.6'
• EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF): 0
• WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX): 133'
• TIDAL DATUM:
•• MHW (NAVD)= +0.01'
• MLW (NAVD)= -0.58'
• • PROPOSED OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF): 567
• TOTAL OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF): 567
• TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM MHWL: 36'
DESIGNED: JR 1' • _ _ _
Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. 72 S O U T H P O RT COVE DRAWN
BY 0417-23 2. _
Marine & Environmental Consulting JOB NO.: 22035 a.
3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL34104-3732 CONCEPT PLAN 02 SHEET NO, 01OF02 5.
Email: tuna@thanaples.com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 RYNO. 5875 SECTION-6 TOWNSHIP-48S RANGE- 25E
36' PROTRUSION FROM MHWL
EXISTING
MANGROVES 4' 14' BOAT LIFT
Turrell, Hall &Associates, Inc.
Marine &Environmental Consulting
3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732
Email: tuna@thanaples.com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632
ALL PILES TO BE -
WRAPPED FROM 12"
ABOVE MHWL TO 6" ;
BELOW SUBSTRATE:
72 SOUTHPORT CO�/E
CONCEPT SECTION 02
0 3 5 fo
scartE�N ;��7
FIXED
DOCK
L MHW = +0.01' NAVD
DESIGNED: JR 7, _ _
DRAWN BY: RMJ 2.
CREATED: 04-17-23 3.
JOB NO.: 22035 4.
SHEET NO.: 02 OF 02 15.
SECTION-6 TOWNSHIP-48S RANGE-25E